&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste
an Emergency Response
(5104)
EPA 550-B-04-002
March 2004
vwvw.epa.gov/emergencies
          RMP*Submit 2004™
          User's Manual

-------
                               What's New for 2004

RMPs must be fully updated and re-submitted at least once every five years. Most RMPs were
submitted by the initial deadline of June 21, 1999, so they must be updated and re-submitted by
June 21, 2004, unless they were updated and re-submitted previously. EPA is releasing
RMP* Submit 2004 to facilitate RMP re-submissions in calendar year 2004.

Importing your old data:     RMP* Submit 2004 can import your older versions of RMPs.
                          When RMP* Submit imports these older versions, it will check the
                          NAICS code, the county name, the DUNS number, and the lat/long
                          and display any errors found.

Improved features:         'New NAICS selector to help you select your NAICS code;
                          •Enhanced user interface, including larger screen size and larger
                          fonts;
                          •indicators for critical and mandatory fields;
                          •improved data validation;
                          •Updated county name listing; and
                          •improved accessibility features and support for Windows High
                          Contrast modes.

                             Changes to RMP*Submit

In 2004, EPA revised the Agency's Chemical Accident Prevention Rule (Risk Management
Program) to include several new data elements in Risk Management Plans (RMPs) and to change
several requirements regarding the filing of RMPs.

RMP*Submit 2004 incorporates the new data elements:
       a. An e-mail address for the emergency contact person (if an email address exists).
       b.Name, address, and telephone number of the consultant/contractor who prepared RMP,
       if any.
       c.The purpose and type of any submission that revises or otherwise affects previously
       filed RMPs.

RMP*Submit 2004 also reflects the fact that the revised rule eliminates the requirement to
include a brief description of your facility's off-site consequence analysis in the RMP Executive
Summary.

Other rule changes do not affect RMP*Submit 2004, but you should be aware that the revised
rule requires the five-year accident history portion of RMPs (section 6) to be revised within six
months of any accident that meets the accident history reporting requirements. Emergency
contact information also must be corrected within one month of a change.

-------
                             WHERE TO GO FOR HELP

RMP Reporting Materials:

Visit our website for updates and information about RMP*Submit, for guidance documents,
industry-specific model plans, Off-Site Consequence Analysis specific guidance and calculator,
Frequently Asked Questions, Fact Sheets and other information:
http://yosemite.epa. gov/oswer/ceppoweb .nsf/content/RMPS .htm

RMP Contacts:

Under the Clean Air Act section 112, States can choose to take delegation of the RMP Program.
If they do, they become the Implementing Agency for that State. In delegated States, you may
contact your State Implementing Agency for assistance. In all other States,  your EPA regional
office is the implementing agency and you may contact them for assistance.  We maintain
current phone numbers for State and regional contacts on our website:
http://yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/content/112r-sts.htm

RMP Regulatory Questions:

If you have a question about an RMP reporting requirement, you can also call the toll free
RCRA, Superfund & EPCRA Call Center at:
Phone:       (800) 424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 [Washington, DC area callers please use this
             number]
TTY:        (800) 553-7672 or (703) 412-3323 [Washington, DC area callers please use this
             number]
When:       Monday - Friday, 9:00 am - 5:00 pm Eastern Time
             Closed Federal Holidays
Internet:      www. epa. gov/epaoswer/hotline
Email:       epacallcenter@bah.com

RMP*Submit Software Support:

For software questions or installation problems, contact the RMP Reporting Center at:
Phone:       (301) 429-5018
When:       Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 4:30pm Eastern Time
             Closed Federal Holidays
Email:       userrmp.usersupport@epcra.org

-------
                                Table of Contents

Chapter 1     Getting Started	  Ch. 1 Pg. 1
       A. Introduction	  Ch. 1 Pg. 1
       B. Before You Start	  Ch. 1 Pg. 1
       C. Hardware and Software Requirements	  Ch. 1 Pg. 3
       D. Installation Instructions	  Ch. 1 Pg. 3
       E. Importing Data	  Ch. 1 Pg. 3
       F. Using RMP*Submit	  Ch. 1 Pg. 4
       G. Welcome and Main Menu Screens	  Ch. 1 Pg. 8

Chapter 2     Entering Data	  Ch. 2 Pg. 1
       Section 1: Registration  	  Ch. 2 Pg. 1
       Section 2: Toxics: Worst-Case	 Ch. 2Pg. 17
       Section 3: Toxics: Alternative releases	 Ch. 2 Pg. 22
       Section 4: Flammables: Worst-Case 	 Ch. 2 Pg. 26
       Section 5: Flammables: Alternative Releases	 Ch. 2 Pg. 29
       Section 6: Five-year accident history	 Ch. 2 Pg. 32
       Section 7: Prevention Program for Program 3 Processes	 Ch. 2 Pg. 43
       Section 8: Prevention Program for Program 2 Processes	 Ch. 2 Pg. 54
       Section 9: Emergency Response Program  	 Ch. 2 Pg. 59
       Executive Summary	 Ch. 2 Pg. 62

Chapter 3     How to Assemble and Submit Your RMP	  Ch. 3 Pg. 1
       Completeness Check 	  Ch. 3 Pg. 1
       Certification Letter	  Ch. 3 Pg. 3
       Where to send completed RMP Reports 	  Ch. 3 Pg. 5
       Record Keeping	  Ch. 3 Pg. 6

Chapter 4     Submitting CBI and Trade Secrets  	  Ch. 4 Pg. 1

Chapter 5     What to Expect After You Submit	  Ch. 5 Pg. 1

Chapter 6     Corrections to Your RMP  	  Ch. 6 Pg. 1

Chapter 7     Updating and Certifying All 9 Sections of Your RMP: Re-submission
               	  Ch. 7 Pg. 1

Chapter 8      Notifying EPA that Your Facility is No Longer Covered by RMP:
                   De-registration
	  Ch. 8 Pg. 1

-------
Appendices

A     Ri sk Management PI an F orm
B     Paper Submission Cover Form
C     Sample Certification Letters
D     CBI Substantiation Form
E     CBI Unsanitized Data Element Form
F      How to Report your Facility Latitude and Longitude
G     Keyboard Commands for RMP*Submit

List of Exhibits

Exhibit 1.  Welcome screen
Exhibit 2.  Main Menu screen
Exhibit 3.  List of Risk Management Plans screen
Exhibit 4.  Latitude and Longitude Values for Specific Cities
Exhibit 5.  Example Calculation of Full-Time Equivalent Employees
Exhibit 6.  Program Eligibility Criteria
Exhibit 7.  Atmospheric Stability Classes
Exhibit 8.  RMP*Submit Keyboard Equivalents
                                                                              Ch. 1 Pg. 1

-------
CHAPTER 1      GETTING STARTED

A. Introduction

The RMP*Submit User Manual provides assistance in preparing and submitting Risk
Management Plans (RMPs).  RMP*Submit software is the free tool EPA developed to facilitate
electronic submission and is designed to significantly reduce errors in submission through
"checks " for each data element.  If you are unable to submit your RMP electronically, submit
your RMP on the Risk Management Plan Form (see Chapter 3).

The RMP*Submit User Manual includes:
       -Technical help on using RMP*Submit;
       -Instructions on how to complete each data element;
       -Details on how to submit your RMP; and
       -What to expect after you submit.

RMP*Submit has four functions:

••     Data Entry - Allows you to add new or edit existing RMPs (first-time submissions,
       corrections, and re-submissions); check your RMP for completeness; and create the
       submission file.
       Edit Certification Letters - Allows you to edit the template for the certification letter to
       accompany your submission (for Program 1, for Program 2 or 3, and for a corrected
       RMP).
••     Import - Allows you to import RMPs from previous versions of RMP*Submit. Also, if
       you used your own software to create your RMP, you can import the data and use
       RMP* Submit to verify the "completeness" of your RMP.
       Edit De-registration Letter- Generates a de-registration letter.

This RMP* Submit Manual provides instructions for entering all sections of the RMP. It also
includes a copy of the RMP paper form (Appendix A) for those who need to submit their RMP on
paper.  In addition, Appendices C and D include the necessary forms for claiming Confidential
Business Information (CBI), since these forms may not be submitted electronically.

B. Before You Start

-Are you subject to the RMP reporting requirements?   Check the requirements, and for
updates and re-submissions check your 5-year anniversary date if you already have an RMP in the
system.

-What is your EPA Facility ID? If you already have an RMP in the system, you have an EPA
Facility ID. It is essential that we match your new RMP to any earlier versions. Your EPA
Facility ID appears in a letter sent by the EPA Reporting Center after your first-time submission.
The number has twelve digits. Call the EPA Reporting Center if you need help at (301) 429-5018.

                                                                             Ch. 1 Pg. 2

-------
First-time submissions should leave the EPA Facility ID blank.

-What category are your processes in: Program 1, 2 or 3? Each process at your facility
having more than a specified amount ("threshold quantity") of a covered chemical ("regulated
substance") will be in one of these categories. The category determines some of your reporting
requirements and governs how you enter the data.

C. Hardware and Software Requirements

RMP is designed to run on Microsoft Windows versions 98, NT 4.0, 2000, ME,  and XP.  To
install and run RMP*Submit, you will need 165 MB of available hard disk space.  You will also
need a minimum of 16 MB RAM for Windows 98 or a minimum of 32 MB RAM for Windows
NT 4.0, 2000, ME, and XP. Listed below are the minimum computer hardware and software
requirements for installing and running RMP*Submit:
      Personal Computer:   Pentium II or newer
      Printer:              Standard inkjet or laser printer
      Mouse:              Standard (note: mouse wheel is not supported)

D. Installation Instructions

RMP*Submit can be installed by downloading the program files from the EPA website:
http ://yosemite. epa. gov/oswer/ceppoweb .nsf/content/ap-rmsb .htm

To install RMP*Submit from Internet download:

1.     Using a Web browser, navigate to the EPA Web site and locate and click upon the link to
      install RMP*Submit (rmpsubmit.exe).

2.     When prompted by the Web browser whether to Open or Save the file, select to Open it.

3.     Follow the ensuing system prompts. You will be able to save RMP* Submit to a directory
      of your choice. The default is: C:\Program FilesVRMP Submit V3.

The installation program will inform you  if the installation was successful. If you encounter
problems during installation, follow the instructions provided by the installation program.

Notes for users with dial-up connections

••     Downloading RMP*Submit 2004  can take as long as three hours. The progress bar
      advances as it downloads each installation section from the Web server.  Sections that are
      considerably larger than the others may result in the progress bar not moving for an
      extended period of time.  Please be patient;  the progress bar will advance again, once the
      downloading is complete. If your connection to the Internet is interrupted, the installation
      will resume where it left off after the connection has been reestablished.

                                                                              Ch. 1 Pg. 3

-------
       Dial-up users may wish to download the application over several sessions. In order to do
       this, perform the following steps:

       1.  Click on the Progress Meter Cancel button during the installation.

       2.  You will be asked if you would like to Exit or Resume the application. Select Exit.

       3.  If you are prompted to Abort or Retry the installation, select Abort.

       4.  Next, you will be asked if you would like to roll back the installation. Select No.

       5.  When you are ready to  continue the installation, using a Web browser, navigate to the
       EPA Web site and locate and click upon the link to install RMP*Submit (rmpsubmit.exe).
       Downloading will resume  where it was last aborted.

E. Importing Data

You may have RMP data from a previous version of RMP* Submit or another source that you
want to import into RMP*Submit 2004. When RMP*Submit 2004 imports older versions, it will
check the NAICS code, the county name, the DUNS number, and the lat/long and display any
errors found.

*   *   Tip   If you plan to import old RMPs, do not erase your copy of the previous version of
             RMP*Submit until you have successfully imported the data into RMP*Submit
             2004.

To import data from a previous version of RMP* Submit, you will need a copy of your RMP
submission file called "rmp.txt." You may have copied this file to either a diskette or your hard
drive.

If you don't have a copy of the submission  file, but do have a copy of a previous version of
RMP*Submit, you can generate the  submission file using the previous version.

To create a copy of your submission file, open the earlier version of RMP* Submit and:

1.      Select an RMP from the List of Risk Management Plans Screen and click the Submit
       button.

2.      Next, RMP*Submit prompts  you to enter an output drive letter.

3.      Enter the drive where you  want to save your RMP. The RMP filename will be rmp.txt.

If you need an electronic copy of your RMP submission file, you may call the RMP Reporting

                                                                               Ch. 1 Pg. 4

-------
Center at (301 429-5018), or contact your State Implementing Agency. Because of security
concerns pertaining to the off-site consequence analysis portions of RMPs, you will be asked to
provide documentation of your position at the facility before EPA or another agency provides you
with the electronic copy of the facility's RMP.

If you are importing data from another source (for example, a commercial software package), the
data must be in an ASCII file formatted in accordance with the Risk Management Plan ASCII File
Format.  See EPA's website at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/content/RMPS.htm.

To import data:

1.      Click the Import button from the Main Menu screen. The Select Import File Dialog Box
       appears.
2.      Select the drive, folder, and specific file name of the RMP to  import into RMP*Submit.
       Click in the Open button.
3.      If errors are detected in importing your text file, you will receive an error message.
4.      Click OK to display the error message log for your RMP. The RMP Import Error Log
       Screen will display.  Select File, Print function to view or print the RMP Import Error
       Log.

F. Using RMP*Submit

Some points before you begin entering data:

• •    RMP*Submit automatically saves the information you enter.

• •    RMP*Submit provides "Help." Use the Help button or, to get context-specific help, place
       cursor in field and press .

• •    Drop down lists are provided to ensure that users select appropriate choices for RMP data
       elements where applicable.

• •    Date fields can be entered in several different formats, including:

                    8/16/03             8/16/2002           August 16,2003
                    August-16-2003      aug-16-2003         aug-16-98
                    Aug 16 03           16 aug 2003          aug-16 (inserts current year)

             No matter how you enter the date, it will be displayed as 08/16/2003.

• •    Check boxes are yes/no fields. The default is "no." A check  indicates a response of
       "yes." Clicking inside the boxes or pressing the space bar toggles the check mark (X) on
       and off.
                                                                               Ch. 1 Pg. 5

-------
       Similar to Windows, RMP*Submit has a function to reverse the last change. The
       Edit/Undo function will restore one data field. Pressing  twice will restore an
       entire page.

       The status bar, located in the lower left-hand corner of the RMP*Submit window, displays
       helpful formatting information and brief instructions about selected fields, command
       buttons, or menu items.

       It is important that you create backup copies of your RMP* Submit data, to avoid having to
       re-enter the information after a system malfunction.

       To help ensure that your RMP is complete and accurate, RMP*Submit checks many (but
       not all) data fields as you enter data.
Navigating RMP'Submit

Most users will navigate within RMP*Submit using a mouse. Information about navigating with
the keyboard is found in Appendix K of this manual. You can access functions from the menu
bar or the command buttons on each screen.
Creating Backup Copies of Your Data

It is important that you create backup copies of your RMP* Submit data, to avoid having to
re-enter the information after a system malfunction.  There are several circumstances that can
result in the loss of your data:

• •    A hard drive failure may require you to re-format or to replace your drive.

• •    If your computer is turned off while the system is updating the RMP database, the
       database can become corrupt and unusable.

• •    If, for any reason, you re-install the RMP*Submit application, the RMP database will be
       overwritten with a new, empty database file.

To backup your RMP data, simply copy the file SRMPDATA2002.MDB to an alternate location.
SRMPDATA2002.MDB can be found in the directory or folder to which you installed the
RMP*Submit application, usually C:\Program FilesVRMP Submit V3. It is recommended that
you copy this file to a diskette (the A drive), CD, or to some other removable media (such as a zip
drive).  You may also choose to copy the file to a network file server drive.  The important point
is that the file be copied to a drive that is different from the one you are using to run
RMP*Submit.  You should exit the RMP*Submit application before making the backup copy.
The frequency of backup depends on how much time you spend entering data. Making a backup
after each hour of data entry means that you will have, at most, one hour of data re-entry after

                                                                              Ch. 1 Pg. 6

-------
restoring from the backup copy.
Restoring Your Data from a Backup Copy

To restore your data, copy the file SRMPDATA2002.MDB from the backup location into the
directory of folder to which you installed the RMP* Submit application, usually C:\Program
FilesVRMP Submit V3 overwriting if necessary the SRMPDATA2002.MDB file that may already
be there.  In case of re-installation of RMP* Submit, perform the re-installation before copying the
SRMPDATA2002.MDB backup copy.
Checking Your Entry for Completeness

To help ensure that your RMP is complete and accurate, RMP*Submit checks many (but not all)
data fields as you enter data.

• •     If you skip an essential field, RMP*Submit prompts you to enter data before proceeding.

• •     If you enter a value outside the acceptable range of values, RMP*Submit prompts you to
       enter an acceptable value before proceeding.

• •     If you attempt to leave a record that contains blanks in required fields, RMP*Submit asks
       if you  want to identify the required fields in the form that have not been filled in.

• •     RMP*Submit has an extensive validation function that checks an entire RMP and allows
       you to create a report of all errors.

To have RMP*Submit check your RMP data for errors:

1.      Select an RMP and click the Check button from the List of Risk Management Plans
       Screen. If RMP*Submit finds any errors it will prompt you to view the error report.

2.      The validation function will also be executed automatically each time you Create
       Submission File, as described in the next section of this manual.
Printing Your RMP Data

RMP*Submit provides the capability to print an entire RMP or selected parts of an RMP from
within any section of the current RMP.

1.      Click Print from the List of Risk Management Plans Screen or select  from
       the Menu bar. The RMP Report Options Dialog Box will appear.
                                                                               Ch. 1 Pg. 7

-------
2.      Click Entire RMP or select a section or subsection of the RMP to print.

3.      Click the Preview button to view your RMP before printing. When you preview an RMP,
       each section is displayed as a separate report. You may print or close each report as
       appropriate.

4.      Click the Print button to send the RMP directly to the printer without previewing it.

5.      Click the Cancel button to return to the previous Data Entry screen.


Create Submission File

Once you have completed entering your RMP data, you can create a disk for submitting your
RMP to EPA.

1.      Select an RMP from the List of Risk Management Plans Screen and click the Create
       Submission File button.

2.      A message box will display, asking if this is your first submission, a correction or a re-
       submission. If you answer "Correction" or "Resubmission," RMP*Submit will check to
       make sure that you have entered your RMP Facility Identifier.  See Chapters 6 and 7 for
       more information about submitting.

3.      Next, RMP*Submit prompts you as to whether you wish to output this RMP to a floppy
       diskette.  If so, insert a formatted diskette into the appropriate drive.

4.      Enter the drive where you want to save your RMP (Drive A: is the default), and click OK.
       For example, if your 3.5-inch disk drive is drive B:, you would enter "b".  Next, another
       message box will display that says, "RMP will be output to  file a:\rmp.txt.  Is diskette in
       Drive?" (A: represents the output drive  you have chosen). Make sure that your disk is in
       the correct drive and click OK. Your RMP is output (saved) to your submission disk with
       the filename rmp.txt. The Create Submission File function will automatically validate
       the selected RMP.  If there are no critical errors, the RMP will be exported to a text file.
       You will  also be asked if you would like to preview the error report described in Section
       4.3.2. If critical errors are found during validation, this operation will be terminated.
       View the error report to see where errors exist in your RMP.
                                                                                 Ch. 1 Pg. 8

-------
G. Welcome and Main Menu Screens

Welcome to RMP'Submit Screen

When you start RMP*Submit, the Welcome to RMP*Submit screen appears. The Welcome
Screen (Exhibit 1) summarizes the steps for entering and submitting RMP data.  Click the Print
button to print this screen.  Click the Close button to close the Welcome screen and go to the
Main Menu. To disable the Welcome screen so that it does not display again, click the "Don't
display this message again" box at the bottom of the Welcome screen. To re-enable the display
of this dialog box, select Edit -> Options - > User Settings from the menu bar of the Main
Menu.
                I RMP'Submit
                  Welcome to RMP*Submit
                 J/Velcome to RMP*Submit - a system developed by the U.S. Environmental
                 Protection Agency (EPA) to assist you in documenting and submitting Risk
                 Management Plans (RMPs) required under the Clean Air Act Section 112(r).
                 RMP*Submit allows you to:

                 -- Capture your RMP information and put it on a diskette in the proper format;
                 -- Receive on-line help to assist you in completing your RMP; and
                   Check your data to identify errors in your RMP prior to submission.

                 To prepare your Risk Management Program, which is the basis for your plan, you
                 will want to consult the following documents. All of these materials are available,
                 or will be posted as soon as they become available, electronically through EPA's
                 Accident Prevention and Risk Management  Program web page
                    Don't display this message again.
Print
          Close
                          Exhibit 1. Welcome to RMP*Submit screen
       Tip    When the Welcome to RMP*Submit screen first appears, clicking the vertical
               scroll bar may cause all the text to be highlighted (selected). If so, simply click
               inside the text box or press  to clear (unselect).
                                                                                       Ch. 1 Pg. 9

-------
Main Menu

When you close the Welcome screen, the Main Menu form (Exhibit 2) provides access to four
major functions: Data Entry; Edit Certification Letters; Import; and Create De-registration Letter.
1 File Edit Tools Help S


riji fD * p., /,.,.. v ™
lilrlJT tjUutnit

f *r j GEm-<*»
Systems for Risk Management Plans
Version: 3.0.11

Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office
(CEPPO)
1' " • '< 	


[Data Entry)
Edit Certification
Letters
Import
De Registration
Exit

    Edit existing (or add new) Risk Management Plan (RMP)
                               Exhibit 2. Main Menu screen
Description of the Major Functions:

Data Entry

The Data Entry function allows you to add new or edit existing RMPs (first-time submissions,
corrections, and re-submissions); delete RMPs; check your RMP for completeness; print; and
create the submission file.

The commands "New" and "Edit" allow you to enter the data elements for the Registration, Worst
Case, and Alternative Release Scenarios, Five-Year Accident History, Program Level 2 and
Program Level 3 Prevention Programs, and Emergency Response Plan, and Executive Summary
sections of the RMP.
                                                                               Ch. 1 Pg. 10

-------
When you select Data Entry, if you have not previously created an RMP or if there are no
existing RMPs, you will go directly to the Section 1 Registration Information Screen.  If you have
existing RMPs, the List of Risk Management Plans Screen will be displayed (Exhibit 3).  The List
of Risk Management Plans Screen displays a list of previously entered RMPs, by facility  name.
     i. »F RMP'Submit - [Data Entry]
     S File  Tools  Help
                  -.ID.IX
                    a x
       List of Risk Management Plans
        Form Approved: TBD
OMB Control Number: 2050-0144
                             Double click on a facility name to edit its RMP.

                   Facility Name                 Description (click here to change it)
                   yttyutyutyutyu
                New     Edit    Delete    Check     Print     Create Submission File    Close
      Double click on Facility bo view registration data.
                        Exhibit 3. List of Risk Management Plans screen
To edit an existing RMP:
       Double-click on the facility name to go directly to the "Section 1. Registration
       Information" screen.

To execute any of the RMP functions (Edit, Delete, Check, Print, Create Submission File) for an
existing RMP:
       Single-click on the facility name. This will highlight the name.  Then, click on the
       appropriate button to execute the following RMP functions:
                      New RMP - Add a new RMP facility plan
               ••      Edit the selected RMP - This will open "Section 1. Registration
                      Information" screen
               ••      Delete selected RMP - All records for the selected RMP will be deleted.
                                                                                     Ch. IPg. 11

-------
                    Check - The RMP will be checked for completeness.
                    Print - This function will print the RMP.
                    Create Submission File - This function will create the file for submission.
                    Close - Data Entry screen will be closed
Edit Certification Letter

Part 68 specifies that a signed certification statement must be sent with each RMP:
        68.185  Certification.
               (a) For Program 1 processes, the owner or operator shall submit in the RMP
               the certification statement provided in § 68.12(b)(4) of this part.

               (b) For all other covered processes, the owner or operator shall submit in the
               RMP a single certification that, to the best of the signer's knowledge,
               information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the information
               submitted is true, accurate, and complete.
This function will allow you to edit the template for the certification letter to accompany your
submission (for Program 1, for Program 2 or 3, and for a corrected RMP). You can cut and paste
this text into your own word processing package to finalize and print the letter. Sample
certification letters are provided in Appendix C.

The certification statement must be signed by the owner or operator or a senior official with
management responsibility for the person (or persons) completing the RMP.  The owner,
operator, or official must certify the accuracy and completeness of the RMP by signing and dating
the certification statement. The statement applies to all the information supplied in the RMP and
should be signed only after the form is complete.  The name and title of the person signing the
statement should be printed  or typed on the certification. The certification statement submitted
must bear the original signature of the person making the certification.
Import

You may have RMP data from a previous version of RMP* Submit or another source that you
want to import into RMP*Submit 2004.  When RMP*Submit 2004 imports older versions, it will
check the NAICS code, the county name, the DUNS number, and the lat/long and display any
errors found.

Additional information about the Import function is presented earlier in this chapter.
                                                                               Ch. 1 Pg. 12

-------
Create De-registration Letter

Changes may occur at your facility that make it no longer subject to part 68 (e.g., you replace the
regulated substances in your processes with unregulated substances). In that event, you must
submit a letter to the RMP Reporting Center within six months and include the effective date of
the de-registration (the date on which your facility was no longer covered by part 68) and the
reason for the de-registration.  The letter must be signed by the owner or operator and include
your EPA FACILITY ID as assigned by the RMP Reporting Center (also known as RMP ID)
number.

The Create De-registration Letter function will generate a letter for you. See Chapter 8 for
more details.
                                                                               Ch. 1 Pg. 13

-------
 CHAPTER 2     ENTERING DATA

When you create a new RMP for a facility, you must start with Section 1 Registration
Information.  The other sections of the RMP are only accessible while the Registration
Information Screen for the facility is open.

You cannot enter data for Sections 2 through 5, 7, and 8 until you have entered facility name and
process-specific information.

Section 1:  Registration

All covered facilities must complete the registration portion of the RMP even if you have only
Program 1 processes. The registration consists of facility identification information.

l.l.a. Facility Name. Provide the name of your facility. The name must be specific to the site; if
the site is part of a large corporation, the name may be the corporate name plus the location (for
example ABC Chemicals - Hightown Plant). Throughout the Risk Management Program, the
term "facility" means "any buildings, structures, equipment, installations or substance emitting
stationary activities  (i) which belong to the same industrial group, (ii) which are located on
one or more  contiguous properties, (iii) which are under  the control of the same person (or
persons under common control), and (iv)  from which an accidental release may occur."

l.l.b. Parent Company #1 Name. Your  parent company is the corporation or other business
entity that owns at least 50 percent of the voting stock of your company.  If you are owned by a
joint venture, enter the first of your two major owners here. If your company does not have a
parent company, leave this data element blank.

l.l.c. Parent Company #2 Name. If you  are owned by a joint venture, enter the name of the
second major owner here.

1.2 EPA Facility Identifier.  The EPA Facility ID # must be left blank for first-time
submissions.  Otherwise, use the  number that was assigned to your facility by the RMP Reporting
Center after your first submission. The RMP Reporting Center included this number in their
acknowledgment letter.  The EPA Facility ID # is  a unique, 12-digit number.  (If you don't have
your EPA Facility ID#, call the RMP Reporting Center at 301-429-5018.)

1.3. Other  EPA Systems Facility Identifier.  Enter one of the following Facility Identification
numbers, in order of preference:

       TRI (Toxic Release Inventory) Facility ID number (15 characters)

       Or

       Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) RCRIS Handler ID (12 characters)

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 1

-------
       (This Handler ID is the same as the RCRA Biennial Reporting System (BRS) ID.  Soon,
       BRS and RCRIS will be combined into the same system called RCRAInfo which will also
       use this ID.)

       Or

       Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
       CERCLIS Site ID (7 characters)

If you know you have a facility ID for reporting to one of the EPA programs above, but do not
know what it is, you can find it by doing a search of EnviroFacts'  Facility database on the Internet
at: http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/fii/fii_query_java.html  or calling the EPCRA Hotline at
800-424-9346.

If your facility does not have an ID Number as described above, leave this data element blank.

1.4.a. Facility Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS). A Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS)
is a nine-digit identification number that allows your facility to be cross-referenced to various
business information. If you have a DUNS number, it should be available from your treasurer or
financial officer.  You can also ascertain the number through Dun and Bradstreet (check their
website at www.dnb.com). If you don't have a DUNS number, leave this data element blank.

1.4.b-c. Parent Company Dun & Bradstreet Number(s) (DUNS)  Enter the DUNS number of
your parent company(ies), if applicable. If you are owned by a joint venture, enter the numbers
for your two major owners. If you do not have a parent company or your parent company does
not have a DUNS number, leave this item blank.

1.5.a-e. Facility Location Address. Enter your facility location address, including the street,
city, state, and zip code (including the 4 digit extension, if applicable) of your facility. This is the
location where regulated substances are present. The city should be the local legal jurisdiction,
for example, a township or village.  Use local street and road designations, not post office or
rural box numbers.  This location may not represent the mailing address. EPA will not
attempt to mail correspondence to this address.  All correspondence will be mailed to the
address provided at 1.6.c-h. If your location and mailing address are the same, then you will fill
in the same address at 1.6.c-h.

l.S.f. Facility County. Enter the county in which the facility is located.

1.5.g-h. Facility Latitude and Longitude.

Enter the latitudinal and longitudinal coordinates of your facility in decimal degrees. You can
enter decimal latitude or longitude values to six decimal points precision. For example, a facility
with latitude / longitude of:
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 2

-------
       39"!' 42", -76"42' 43" (degrees/minutes/seconds format)

would be entered as

       39.028333, -076.711944 (decimal degrees format)

The DMS Calculator button provides a function to convert from degrees/minutes/seconds to
decimal degrees.

Enter only numerical data. Do not preface numbers with letters  such as N or W to denote the
hemisphere. For most facilities using RMP*Submit, the hemispheres will be North or West,
which would correspond to a positive latitude and a negative longitude. You would therefore
enter no sign for latitude and a "-" sign as the first character for longitude.

It is important to provide accurate latitude and longitude values in your RMP.  RMP*Submit will
help you enter accurate  coordinates by letting you know if the value that you enter falls outside of
the range of values for the county in which your facility is located.


       *    *  Tip    Be careful not to reverse your latitude and longitude coordinates. Latitude
                      in the  48 contiguous states ranges from 25••to 49»»while longitude ranges
                      from-72"to-124v
                                      TRI Facility Siting Tool

           EPA has developed the TRI Facility Siting Tool to allow facilities that submit Toxic
           Release Inventory (TRI) reports to obtain their latitude and longitude. This tool may also be
           used by facilities submitting Risk Management Plans (RMP). The tool asks you to enter
           either a zip code or a city and state. It then provides a map that you can zoom into and pan
           sideways, to identify your location. Once you get to the maximum zoom-in level, it will
           show a satellite photo over the map, to further assist in pinpointing your exact location. The
           tool will then display the latitude and longitude in "degrees/minutes/seconds" format. You
           should use the DMS  Calulator button in RMP* Submit to convert to decimal degrees.

           The TRI Facility Siting Tool can be accessed at the following web address:
           http://www.epa.gov/tri/report/siting tool/index.htm

           If you use the TRI Facility Siting Tool to obtain your latitude and longitude, you should put
           the following values in the additional latitude/longitude fields:

                   i. Lat/Long Method:  12 - Interpolation-Photo
                   m. Source Map Scale Number: 24000
                   k. Horizontal accuracy  measure (m): 25
                   1. Horizontal Reference Datum Code: 002 - North American Datum of 1983

           For additional information about latitude and longitude, see Appendix F of this manual.
                                                                                        Ch. 2 Pg. 3

-------
1.5.1. Method for determining Latitude and Longitude  You also must indicate the method
that you used to determine your latitude and longitude data.

l.S.j. Description of location identified by Latitude and Longitude. You must also describe
the exact location your latitude and longitude values represent.  See Appendix F for the complete
lists of codes to be used for this element.  The most common Latitude and Longitude location
descriptions are PG (Plant Entrance - General) and CE (Center of Facility).

l.S.k. Horizontal Accuracy Measure. You must also provide the measure of the accuracy (in
meters) of the latitude and longitude coordinates.

1.5.1. Horizontal Reference Datum Code. You must provide the code that represents the
reference datum used in determining latitude and longitude coordinates you entered in l.S.g and
l.S.h, respectively. The range of permissible values is given in Appendix F.

l.S.m. Source Map Scale Number. The number that represents the proportional distance on the
ground for one unit of measure on a map or photo. This field must be supplied if you have chosen
a lat/Long Method of type "Interpolation - Map" (II) or "Interpolation - Photo" (12).

1.6.a. Owner or Operator Name. Enter the name of the legal owner or operator of the facility
(person, company, association, or government agency).

1.6.b. Owner or Operator Phone.  Enter the owner or operator's business phone number,
including area code.

1.6.c-h. Owner or Operator Mailing Address. EPA will mail all correspondence to this
address. It need not be the facility address. Enter the owner or operator's business mailing
address, including street or P.O. or rural box, city, state, and zip code (including 4 digit extension,
if applicable). The city should be the local legal jurisdiction, for example, a township or village.
In this instance, you should use post office and rural box numbers, if appropriate.

If your owner/operator mailing address is the same as your facility address, click the Copy
Facility button to automatically fill  in this information.

If your owner/operator address is a foreign address, click the Switch to Foreign Address button
and proceed.

1.7.a. Name of person responsible for RMP (part 68) implementation.
1.7.b. Title of person or position responsible for RMP (part 68) implementation.
Enter the name and title of the person or position with overall responsibility for the risk
management program at your site. Although the individual's name is not required, the title of the
person or the position that has this responsibility is required.

1.8. Emergency Contact.

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 4

-------
1.8.a-b. Name and Title. Enter the name plus the title or job classification of the person
designated as the emergency contact.  If you have more than one contact person, you may want
to list the others in your Executive Summary.
      Your emergency contact should be:
      • »An employee of or a contractor to your facility;
      • 'Knowledgeable about your site;
      • 'Aware of all emergency plans; and
      • 'Able to provide emergency response support or direct response personnel to
      provide support.
l.S.c. Phone Number. Enter the phone number, including area code, where the emergency
contact can be reached during normal business hours.  You most likely will enter the facility
phone number here. If your facility does not have a phone number, you may enter the business
phone number of the emergency contact, the phone number of a dispatcher, or the customer
service phone number.

1.8.d-e. 24-Hour Phone Number & Extension or Pin Number. Enter the phone number,
including area code, where the emergency contact can be reached during non-working hours.
You may enter the emergency contact's 24-hour "beeper" number. There is a space for an
extension or pin number, if applicable.

l.S.f. Emergency Contact E-mail address.  This is a new element in 2004. Provide an e-mail
address (if one exists) for the emergency contact.  Enter N/A if no email address exists.

1.9.a. Facility or Parent Company E-Mail Address (Optional). You may choose to provide an
e-mail address to which inquiries from the public  could be sent. The e-mail address could be for
the person who developed your RMP or your public liaison office.

1.9.b. Facility Public Contact Phone Number (Optional).  You may choose to provide a phone
number for public inquiries.  It could be the phone number of the person who developed your
RMP or of your public liaison office.

1.9.c. Facility or Parent Company WWW Homepage Address (Optional). You may choose to
provide an Internet address where the public can obtain more details on your accident prevention
program,  offsite consequence analysis,  or other facility or corporate information.

1.10. LEPC (Optional).  Enter the name of your Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC)
for your planning district. LEPCs were created to do local planning under the Emergency
Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986.  In RMP*Submit, you will select
your LEPC's name from a pick list based on the facility county and zip code information that you
have provided.  If you do not know  your LEPC's name, you can call your local fire department or
refer to the LEPC Database on the Internet at: http://www.epa.gov/swercepp/lepclist.htm. This
data element will help your LEPC find  the facilities in its jurisdiction.

                                                                             Ch. 2 Pg. 5

-------
1.11. Number of full-time equivalent employees on site.  Enter the number of full-time
equivalent employees who work at your facility. To determine the number of full-time equivalent
employees at your facility, add together the fractions of full-time work performed by part-time or
seasonal employees and round to the nearest whole number (see example below).  Do not include
contract employees.  If your facility is un-manned or is staffed only by part-time employees, you
should briefly explain these circumstances in the executive summary.

For example, suppose a facility has 10 regular full-time employees, two part-time employees that
each work 30 hours per week, and seven seasonal employees that each work 40 hours per week
for three months of the year. You should count the two part-time employees as 3/4 of an
employee each because they work 3/4 that of a full-time employee and the seven seasonal
employees as a 1/4 of a full-time employee each, for the same reason. As shown in the table
below you get 13.25, which you should round to the nearest whole number.  You should enter
"13" for the number of full-time employees.
Type of Employee
Full-time (40 Hours)
Part-Time (30 hours)
Seasonal (3
months/year)
Total
Number of Employees Times the
Fraction of a Full-Time
Employee
lOx 1
2x0.75
7x0.25

Full-Time Equivalent
Employees
10
1.5
1.75
13.25 (rounded to 13)
             Exhibit 5. Example Calculation of Full-Time Equivalent Employees
1.12.a. Covered by OSHA's Process Safety Management (PSM) of Highly Hazardous
Chemicals Standard (29 CFR 1910.110). This data element applies to your facility as a whole
and is not a process-by-process determination.  Therefore, if any process at your facility is subject
to the OSHA PSM standard, select this data element, even if the PSM process is not covered by
the RMP rule. For further information, about OSHA's PSM standard, see
www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/processsafetymanagement.gov.

1.12.b. Covered by EPCRA section 302.  Check this box if you have on site more than a
threshold planning quantity of a substance  that is an extremely hazardous substance (EHS)
defined in 40 CFR 355.  If you are subject to those requirements, check this element, regardless
of whether the EHS is an RMP regulated substance or is held in a process below the 112(r)
threshold quantity. Two quick hints:
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 6

-------
(1)    If you are subject to the RMP rule because you have more than a threshold quantity of a
       toxic substance listed under Section 112(r), you are subject to EPCRA section 302 and
       must select this data element.
(2)    If you are subject to the RMP rule only as a result of flammable substances, you are not
       subject to EPCRA section 302, and you can leave this data element blank.

1.12.C. CAA Title V Air Operating Permit ID. Title V of the Clean Air Act requires major
sources of air pollution to obtain permits. If your facility has been issued a Title V operating
permit by a federal, state,  or local permitting agency, check this element and enter your permit
number.

1.13. OSHA Star or Merit Ranking  (Optional). Check the box if your facility has received a
Star or Merit Ranking under OSHA's  Voluntary Protection Program.

1.14. Last Safety Inspection (by an External Agency) Date.
Record the date of your last safety inspection by an external agency.

1.15. Last Safety Inspection Performed by an External Agency (select one ).
Select the agency (or agencies) that performed the inspection.  If you select "Other," please
specify the agency. If your last safety inspection was a joint inspection, enter multiple agencies
by typing them into the field.

1.16. Will this RMP involve Predictive Filing?
Predictive Filing is an RMP filing option that allows your facility to submit an RMP which
includes regulated substances which may not actually be present at the facility at the time the
RMP is submitted.  This option is intended to assist facilities such as chemical warehouses,
chemical distributors, batch processors and the like whose operations involve highly variable
types and quantities of regulated substances but who are  able to forecast their inventory with
some degree of accuracy.  Under 40 CFR §68.190, a facility is required to update and re-submit its
RMP no later than the date on which a new regulated substance is first present in a covered
process above a threshold quantity. By using Predictive Filing, you will not be required to update
and re-submit your RMP when you receive a new regulated substance if that substance was
included in your latest RMP submission (as long as you receive it in a quantity that does not
trigger a revised offsite consequence analysis as provided in 40 CFR §68.36).

If you use Predictive Filing, you should implement your Risk Management Program and prepare
your RMP in  exactly the same way as if all of the substances included in the RMP were actually
present. This means that you must meet all rule requirements for each regulated substance for
which you file, whether or not that substance is actually present on site  at the time you submit
your RMP. Depending on the substances for which you file, this may require you  to perform
additional worst-case and alternative-case scenarios and to implement additional prevention
program elements. Note that if your facility  uses this option you must still update  and resubmit
your RMP if you receive a new regulated substance which was not included in your latest RMP.
Your facility must also continue to comply with the other update requirements stated in 40 CFR

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 7

-------
§68.190.

If your facility uses Predictive Filing, the RMP database for your facility will indicate that your
facility has filed a predictive RMP. This will inform users of the database that some of the
chemicals in your RMP may not actually be present on site, but will not indicate which specific
chemicals are on site at any given time.  Therefore, you may receive more frequent questions
from the public, local officials, or implementing agencies about your actual chemical inventory.
EPA encourages you to engage in more frequent dialogue with these parties, and in particular
with local emergency planners, emergency responders, and community officials to update them
on your current inventory of regulated substances.

1.17. Process-Specific Information

Click the  button located at the bottom of the last page of the Registration Data Entry
form. The number in parentheses indicates the number of processes that you have already
entered.

In this section of the registration, answer five questions for EACH covered process at your
facility. A few examples follow the descriptions of the data elements below.

The system generates a Process ID # automatically to track multiple processes as you fill out the
remaining sections of your RMP.

Process Description. This description is optional. It is provided to help you (if you need to)
track multiple processes as you fill out the remaining sections of your RMP. This description will
not be submitted to EPA with the RMP data.

1.17.a. Program Level. Each covered process must be assigned to a program level that reflects
the process' potential for public impacts and the level of effort needed to prevent accidents.  The
rule requirements the process must meet depend on the program level to which it is assigned.
Following is a brief description of the applicability criteria for each program level, but you should
consult the rule and Chapter 2 of the General Guidance for Risk Management Programs in
determining the program level applicable to your covered processes:
 Program 1
Program 2
Program 3 (unless eligible for
Program 1)
                                                                                 Ch. 2 Pg. 8

-------
 Process has experienced no
 accident in past 5 years that
 resulted in significant off-site
 impacts,

 No public receptors in
 worst-case circle, and

 Emergency response
 coordinated with local
 responders.
Process is not eligible for
Program  1 or subject to
Program  3.
Process is subject to OSHA
PSM, or

Process is in NAICS code
32211,32411,32511,325181,
325188,325192,325199,
325211, 325311, or 32532.
                          Exhibit 6. Program Eligibility Criteria

A process can qualify for Program 1 even if the process is already subject to OSHA PSM.  For
Program 1 processes, the implementing agency will inspect and enforce only with respect to the
minimal Program 1 requirements. If you assign a process to Program 2 or 3, the implementing
agency will inspect and enforce with respect to all the requirements of the higher program levels,
even though it may qualify for Program 1.  However, if you are already in compliance with the
prevention elements of Program 2 or Program 3, you may want to use the RMP to inform the
community of your prevention efforts.

KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER

        In determining program levels for your process(es), keep in mind the following:

        (1)    The program levels apply to individual processes  and generally indicate the
              risk management measures necessary to comply with this regulation for the
              process, not the facility as a whole. The eligibility of one process for a program
              level does not influence the eligibility of other covered processes for other
              program levels.

        (2)    Any process can be eligible for Program 1, even if it is subject to OSHA PSM
              or is in one of the NAICS codes subject to Program 3.

        (3)    Program 2 is the default program level  There are no "standard criteria" for
              Program 2. Any process that does not meet the eligibility criteria for either
              Programs 1 or 3 is subject to the requirements for Program 2.

 Refer to Chapter 2 of the General Guidance for Risk Management Programs for more
 information on determining the Program levels of your processes.  Once you determine the
 Program level, simply enter 1, 2, or 3 for this data element.
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 9

-------
       Tip   Note that you will not be allowed to enter NAICS codes or chemicals until you
             enter the program level for the process.  Also note that the program level that you
             enter relates to other sections of the RMP. Once you have entered the program
             level, the only way you can change it is by deleting the entire Process record and
             entering a new Process record.
1.17.b. NAICS Code(s). The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
categorizes businesses by fitting them into descriptive categories that correspond to five-digit or
six-digit codes. NAICS codes have replaced SIC codes, with which you may be familiar. For
example, pulp mills are NAICS code 32211, paper mills are 322121 or 322122, and metal platers
are 332813.  The first three digits of a five or six-digit code define a major business sector and
the last two or three digits indicate an establishment's specialty within the major sector.

For this data element you should provide the NAICS code that most closely corresponds to the
process; it will not necessarily be the same NAICS code for your facility as a whole.  For
example, if you manufacture chlorine, then process it to make cleaners, the chlorine
manufacturing is in NAICS code 325818 and the cleaner manufacturing is in NAICS code
325612.  If your chlorine manufacturing vessel is connected by pipes to, or co-located with, the
cleaner manufacturing vessel, they are considered one "process" by the RMP rule.  In such a
case, you should enter the NAICS code that describes the primary activity of the "process."  In
the example above, if the chlorine and cleaner vessels are interconnected, the primary activity of
the "process" is manufacturing cleaner, since that is the ultimate product of the "process." You
may also enter additional NAICS codes if you wish to identify other aspects of a process not
captured by the NAICS codes for the primary activity.  In the example above, you could also
enter NAICS code 325181  for chlorine manufacturing, if you so desire. If you do enter multiple
NAICS codes, be sure to enter your primary NAICS code first.

You should determine the NAICS codes for your processes based on your activities on site using
the 2002 North American Industry Classification System Manual. Appendix B of the General
Guidance for Risk Management Programs provides the NAICS codes for the industry sectors
most likely to be subject to 40 CFR Part 68. RMP*Submit also contains the full list.  You may
also access the full list online at www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html and a cross-walk
between SIC codes and NAICS codes at http:/Avww.census.gov/epcd/www/naicstab.htm.
In addition to these resources, note the availability of the NAICS Code Selector under the
NAICS Help button, available on the NAICS Codes screen.

Below is  the conversion from SIC codes to NAICS codes for the Program 3 NAICS codes. Note
there are 2 duplicates listed in the NAICS column because of the conversion. The 9 SIC codes
translate into a total of 10 NAICS codes.
SIC
2812
2821
NAICS
325181
325211
Sector
Alkalies and chlorine
Plastics and resins
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 10

-------
2873         325311      Nitrogen fertilizer
2879         32532       Pesticide and other agricultural chemicals
2911         32411       Petroleum refineries
2611         32211       Pulp mills only
2819         325188      All other basic inorganic chemical manufacturing
2865         32511       Aromatics have been combined with aliphatics from 2869 to form
                          the new petrochemical manufacturing
             325192      Other covers the cyclic crude and intermediate manufacturing
2869         32511       Aliphatics, joined with aromatics in petrochemical manufacturing;
             325188      Carbon bisulfide, moved to "All other basic inorganic chemical
                          manufacturing" (covered from old 2819);
             325199      Other, moved to "All other basic organic chemical manufacturing."

1.17.C.1. Chemical Name. For each covered process, select the names of all regulated
substances held above the threshold. Many regulated substances have synonyms; however, you
must enter the name of the regulated substance as it appears in 40 CFR § 68.130.  If you have a
NFPA-4 flammable mixture containing regulated flammables, you may list it as a "flammable
mixture." List all of the regulated substances contained in the mixture; however, only report the
quantity of the entire mixture, not the individual substances. RMP* Submit will automatically
enter the corresponding CAS number.

1.17.C.3. Quantity.  For each chemical reported in  1.17.C.1, estimate the maximum quantity (in
pounds) held in the covered process at any one time during the calendar year to two significant
digits.  For example:
       5,333 pounds       should be reported as...      5,300 pounds
       107,899 pounds     should be reported as...      110,000 pounds
       128,000 pounds     should be reported as...      130,000 pounds
                                                                             Ch. 2Pg. 11

-------
Can I use Maximum Quantity On-Site Data from my EPCRA Tier II Reports?

Not directly. EPCRA Tier II reports require maximum quantity on-site in specified ranges.  The RMP registration
asks for the maximum quantity in a process.  Therefore, if your facility has several covered processes containing
the same regulated substance above the threshold, estimate on a process-by-process basis the maximum quantity
of the regulated substance in each process.

You may be able to use raw Tier II data to estimate the quantity of a regulated substance in a process. It is likely
that in preparing your Tier II reports you estimated the quantity of a regulated substance in each process or
building and then added the quantities together to estimate the total maximum on-site. Therefore, you can take
the estimates you used to calculate your Tier II ranges for your RMP registration.

How do I Report Maximum Quantity in a Process for Mixtures or Trade Name Products?

Toxics.  If the regulated toxic substance present in a process is part of a mixture or trade name product, determine
the maximum quantity of the mixture or trade name product and then calculate the weight percent of the regulated
toxic substance to report for quantity.  Do not include the weight of the entire mixture or trade name product.

Flammables. For regulated flammable substances that are part of a mixture, and the mixture meets the criteria of
NFPA-4, report the weight of the mixture.
                                                                                             Ch. 2 Pg. 12

-------
                                    EXAMPLE 1
Suppose you have 21,365 pounds of ammonia in a covered process classified as other basic
inorganic chemicals (NAICS code 32518) and do not have ammonia in any other covered
processes. Report your ammonia maximum as:
Process Number:
Process Description:
1.17.a. Program Level:
1.17.b. NAICS Code(s):
1.17.C. Chemical
1
Basic Inorganic Chemicals
2
32518
1.17.C.1. Name: 1.17.C.2. CAi
Ammonia 7664-41-7
5 #: 1.17.C.3. Quantity (Ibs.):
21,000
Now suppose that in addition to the 21,365 pounds, you also have 25,600 pounds of ammonia in
another covered process classified as nitrogenous fertilizers (NAICS code 325311). In this case,
report a second process as:
Process Number:
Process Description:
1.17.a. Program Level:
1.17.b. NAICS Code(s):
1.17.C. Chemical
2
Nitrogenous fertilizer
2
325311
1.17.C.1. Name: 1.17.C.2. CAS #: 1.17.C.3. Quantity (Ibs.):
Ammonia 7664-41-7 26,000
                                                                            Ch. 2 Pg. 13

-------
                                     EXAMPLE 2
You received one shipment of a nitric acid solution last year that filled your 5,000-gallon storage
tank.  You know that the solution contains 95% nitric acid, which is a regulated chemical with a
threshold quantity of 5,000 pounds.

First, convert gallons to pounds:
The density of 95% nitric acid is about 12 pounds per gallon, so you calculate the total weight of
solution by multiplying 5,000 gallons by 12 to get 60,000 pounds.

Then, calculate the portion of the solution attributable to the regulated toxic substance:
To calculate the weight of nitric acid, you multiply 60,000 pounds by 0.95 to get 57,000 pounds.

Report the nitric acid in this process as follows:
Process Number:
Process Description:
1.17.a. Program Level:
1.17.b. NAICS Code(s):
1.17.C. Chemical
3
Storage - nitric acid
2
325311
1.17.C.1. Name: 1.17.C.2. CAS #: 1.17.C.3. Quantity (Ibs.):
Nitric Acid 7697-37-2 57,000
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 14

-------
l.lS.a. RMP Preparer Name. If an outside contractor or consultant prepared the RMP for the
facility, enter the name of the contractor or consultant.

l.lS.b. RMP Preparer Telephone. Enter the telephone number of the contractor or consultant
who prepared the RMP for the facility.

1.18.c-g. RMP Preparer Address. Enter the street address, city, state, and zip code of the
contractor or consultant who prepared the Risk Management Plan for the facility.
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 15

-------
Overview of Sections 2-5: Offsite Consequence Analysis

You must submit data on:
1.      Worst-case release scenario analysis of covered processes as follows:

       Report one worst-case release scenario for each Program 1 process.  Program 1 processes
       must have no public receptors within the distance to the endpoint in the worst-case
       analysis.

       If your facility has Program 2 or Program 3 processes, report one worst-case release
       scenario to represent all Program 2 and Program 3 processes having toxic regulated
       substances  present above the threshold quantity, and one worst-case release scenario to
       represent all Program 2 and Program 3 processes having flammable regulated substances
       present above the threshold quantity. If you have more than one Program 2 or 3 process,
       you will report the worst-case release scenario for the Program 2 or 3 process that would
       have the greatest potential impact on the public (i.e., the greatest distance to endpoint).
       You may also need to submit an additional worst-case scenario for either hazard class
       (i.e., toxic or flammable), if a worst-case release from elsewhere at your facility would
       potentially  affect a different set of public receptors than those affected by your initial
       worst-case  scenario(s).

2.      Alternative release scenario analysis of Program 2 and Program 3 processes as follows:

       Present one alternative release scenario for each regulated toxic substance held above the
       threshold quantity in a Program 2 or 3 process, including the substance considered in the
       worst-case  analysis.

       Present one alternative release scenario to represent.^// flammable substances held above
       the threshold  quantity in a Program 2 or 3 process.

       Note that alternative release scenarios should be those that will reach an endpoint offsite,
       unless no such scenario exists.

You may include one graphic (map or diagram) in electronic format for each release scenario
that you report, but it is not required.

Using a flammable mixture for your OCA: You may have registered a flammable mixture for
a process, even if the entire flammable mixture does not ever occur together in one vessel in the
process.  When reporting the OCA, choose the flammable mixture from the registration section,
but do the modeling based on the specific components of the flammable mixture that are
contained in the vessel that you are modeling for the OCA.

Refer to Chapter 4 of the General Guidance for Risk Management Programs for more details on
the requirements of the Offsite Consequence Analysis.

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 16

-------
Section 2: Toxics: Worst-Case

Complete this section for each toxic worst-case scenario you report.

2.1.a. Chemical name. Enter the name of the regulated toxic chemical you evaluated in the
worst-case scenario.

2.1.b. Percent weight of chemical (if in a mixture). If your worst-case scenario involves the
release of a mixture containing a regulated substance, enter the percentage weight of the
regulated substance in the mixture. Leave blank if it is not a mixture.

2.2. Physical state. Select the physical state of the chemical in the vessel that you are modeling.
       a. Gas.
       b. Liquid.
       c. Gas liquified by pressure.
       d. Gas liquified by refrigeration.

2.3. Model used (select one). Select the source of your results for your worst-case release
analysis or enter another model name in "Other":
       a. EPA's OCA  Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
       b. EPA's RMP Guidance for Ammonia Refrigeration Reference Tables or Equations
       d. EPA's RMP Guidance for Waste Water Treatment Plants Reference Tables or
       Equations
       e. EPA's RMP Guidance for Warehouses Reference Tables or Equations
       f. EPA's RMP  Guidance for Chemical Distributors Reference Tables or Equations
       g. EPA's RMP*Comp™
       h. Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres (ALOHA®)
       z. Other model (specify)

2.4. Scenario.  Select one of the following which describes your worst-case release scenario.
(Note: This list is set by the regulation.)
       a. Gas release. A release of the substance in a vapor state.
       b. Liquid spill and vaporization. A release of the substance in a liquid state with
       subsequent vaporization.

2.5. Quantity released (Ibs). Enter the quantity of toxic chemical you used for your worst-case
scenario analysis in pounds to 2 significant digits.  This is the total amount that would be lost
from a vessel or pipeline, even if the release location was inside a building or into other
containment. The "release rate" or the rate at which the chemical  actually gets into the outside
air for the downwind dispersion analysis, is reported in 2.6 below. See Chapter 2 on
Determining Worst-Case Scenarios in the RMP Of/site Consequence Analysis Guidance for
more details. Here's how to report the quantity to 2 significant digits:
         5,333 pounds             should be reported as...       5,300 pounds
       107,899 pounds             should be reported as...       110,000 pounds

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 17

-------
If you have less than 1 pound released, round up to 1 pound. You may want to clarify that in
your Executive Summary.

2.6. Release rate (Ibs/minute). Enter the rate of release to the outside air in pounds per minute
to 1 significant digit.  For example:

       4.3 pounds per minuteshould be reported as... 4 pounds per minute
       19 pounds per minute should be reported as... 20 pounds per minute

For gases, a gas liquefied by pressurization alone, or a gas liquefied by refrigeration where the
released refrigerated liquid forms a pool of 1 cm or less in depth, the release rate should be the
total quantity released divided by 10 minutes (this is a regulatory requirement) and multiplied by
the appropriate mitigation factor if a mitigated release.  See Chapter 4 of the General Guidance
for Risk Management Programs for more information.

The worst-case release scenario for liquid substances assumes that the liquid is instantaneously
spilled on the ground or other surface followed by volatilization into the air. For the release of a
liquid or a gas liquefied by refrigeration where the refrigerated liquid forms a pool deeper than 1
cm, the release rate to the air should be the rate of volatilization based on the properties of the
substance and size of the liquid pool formed by the released substance, multiplied by the
appropriate release mitigation factor if a mitigated release.

2.7. Release duration (minutes). Indicate the length of time in minutes to the nearest 10
minutes for the entire quantity released from the vessel, pipeline, or other source to be released
to the outside air.

For gases, a gas liquified by pressurization alone, or a gas liquified by refrigeration where the
released refrigerated liquid forms a pool of 1 cm or less in depth, you should assume that the
release duration is 10 minutes.

For a liquid or a gas liquified by refrigeration where the released refrigerated liquid forms a  pool
deeper than 1 cm, the release duration should be the time required for a pool formed by the
released substance to completely vaporize.

Although in some cases it may take  longer than 60 minutes for the pool to completely volatilize,
most dispersion models use the release rate and calculate the maximum downwind dispersion
distance within 60 minutes; therefore, you  may enter 60 minutes for your duration even if the
duration from your modeling is longer than 60 minutes. You can also enter the exact duration
from your modeling up to 9999 minutes.

2.8. Wind speed  (meters/second).  This value has been set by EPA at 1.5 meters per second.
unless you can demonstrate that local meteorological data applicable to your facility show a
higher minimum wind speed at all times during the last three years.  If you can demonstrate
higher minimums existed, these minimums may be used. Provide the wind  speed in meters per

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 18

-------
second.

2.9. Atmospheric Stability Class.  This value has been set by EPA at "F" stability class, unless
you can demonstrate that local meteorological data applicable to your facility show a less stable
atmosphere  at all times during the last three years. If you can demonstrate less stable conditions
existed, you may use the appropriate stability class.

2.10. Topography (select one). Indicate whether the local topography is urban or rural. Urban
means that there are many obstacles in the immediate area; obstacles include buildings or trees.
Rural means that the terrain is generally flat and unobstructed in the immediate area.

2.11. Distance to endpoint (miles). Indicate the distance to the endpoint in miles to 2
significant digits,  using the endpoint specified for the chemical in 40 CFR Part 68, Appendix A.
Convert your modeling results into miles by dividing the distance in feet by 5280 or yards by
1760.  Refer to the following to determine 2 significant digits:
          .397 miles        should be reported as...       .40 miles
         9.345 miles        should be reported as...      9.3 miles
        20.764 miles        should be reported as...      21 miles

2.12. Residential population within distance to endpoint. Estimate the population within the
circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius  determined by the distance to the
endpoint to two significant digits (e.g., 5,500 people rather than 5,483).  Population estimates
include only residential populations.  You should base your population estimates on the latest
Census data. Information on sources of Census data can be found on the website.

2.13. Public receptors within distance to endpoint. Public receptors must be identified within
the circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the distance to the
endpoint. Public receptor means locations where members of the public may be exposed to toxic
concentrations,  radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release. Public receptors include
locations within the facility's property boundary to which the public has routine and unrestricted
access during or outside business hours (e.g. a recreation field).  Locations inhabited or occupied
by the public at any time without restriction by the source (such as fences or security  guards) are
public receptors (see the  General Guidance for Risk Management Programs for more
information on identifying public receptors). You do not need to list specific locations or
estimate populations at these locations.   The presence of these receptors may be determined
using local street maps. Select all that apply.
       a. Schools. Public and private elementary, secondary, or post-secondary educational
       institutions (e.g., colleges).
       b. Residences
       c. Hospitals
       d. Prisons or Correctional facilities
       e. Recreation areas. Including stadiums, parks, and public pools.
       f. Major commercial, office, or industrial areas.  Including industrial parks, office
       buildings,  shopping malls, commercial areas, and commercial farms.

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 19

-------
       g. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.
2.14. Environmental receptors within distance to endpoint. Environmental receptors must be
identified within the circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the
distance to the endpoint. Environmental receptor means natural areas, such as national or state
parks, forests, or monuments; officially designated wildlife sanctuaries, preserves, refuges, or
areas; and federal wilderness areas, that could be exposed at any time to toxic concentrations,
radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release. Environmental receptors can be identified
on local U.S. Geological Survey maps, which can be found at many libraries. Select all that
apply.
       a. National or state parks, forests, or monuments
       b. Officially designated wildlife sanctuaries, preserves, or refuges
       c. Federal wilderness areas
       d. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.

2.15. Passive mitigation considered.  Mitigation means specific activities, technologies, or
equipment designed or deployed to capture or control substances that have been released to
minimize exposure of the public or the environment. Passive mitigation means equipment,
devices, or technologies that function without human, mechanical, or other energy input.  Select
all passive mitigation measures that were considered in defining the release quantity or rate to
the worst-case scenario.
       a. Dikes. A low wall that acts as a barrier to prevent a spill from spreading.
       b. Enclosures.  Physical containment of the release within a structure (e.g., a building).
       c. Berms. A mound or wall of earth at the top or bottom of a slope that prevents a spill
       from spreading.
       d. Drains. A channel that carries off surface water.
       e. Sumps. A pit or tank that catches liquid runoff for drainage or disposal.
       f. Other (specify)

2.16.  Graphics file name (Optional). You may submit  one graphic file to illustrate each
release scenario. Click to the button to the right of the Graphic File field (the button with three
dots). Locate the graphic file, and press "Open."

Graphics will be accepted in either GIF or JPEG file format. These are the most popular
graphics formats in use today on the Internet.  Most commercial drawing,  painting, or scanning
software supports these two graphics file formats.  You may want to search
www. shareware.com for a list of graphics programs that are available for download, either as
shareware or evaluation versions.

JPEG (pronounced "jay-peg") is a standardized image compression mechanism.  JPEG stands for
Joint Photographic Experts Group, the original name of the committee that wrote the standard.
JPEG is designed for compressing either full-color or gray-scale images of natural, real-world
scenes.  It works well on photographs, naturalistic artwork, and  similar material.

                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 20

-------
GIF (tm) is a standard for defining generalized color "raster" images.  This "Graphics
Interchange Format" allows high-quality, high-resolution graphics to be displayed on a variety of
graphics hardware and is intended as an exchange and display mechanism for graphics images.
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 21

-------
Section 3: Toxics: Alternative releases

Complete this section for each toxic regulated substance held above the threshold quantity in a
Program 2 or Program 3 process.

3.1.a. Chemical Name. Enter the name of the regulated toxic chemical you evaluated in the
alternative release scenario.

3.1.b. Percent weight of chemical (if in a mixture). If your alternative scenario involves the
release of a mixture containing a regulated substance, enter the percentage weight of the
regulated substance in the mixture. Leave blank if it is not a mixture.

3.2. Physical state. Select the physical state of the chemical in the vessel that you are modeling.
       a. Gas.
       b. Liquid.
       c. Gas liquified by pressure.
       d. Gas liquified by refrigeration

3.3. Model used (select one).  Select the source of your results for your alternative release
analysis or enter another model name in "Other."
       a. EPA's OCA  Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
       b. EPA's RMP Guidance for Ammonia Refrigeration Reference Tables or Equations
       d. EPA's RMP Guidance for Waste Water Treatment Plants Reference Tables or
       Equations
       e. EPA's RMP Guidance for Warehouses Reference Tables or Equations
       f. EPA's RMP  Guidance for Chemical Distributors Reference Tables or Equations
       g. EPA's RMP*Comp™
       h. Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres (ALOHA®)
       z. Other model (specify)

3.4. Scenario.  Select one of the following which describes your alternative release scenario or
enter another scenario in Other.  (Note: This list is set by the regulation):
       a. Transfer Hose Failure. Failure of the connection between two or more vessels.
       b. Pipe Leak.  Release through a rupture in a pipe.
       c. Vessel Leak. Release through a rupture in a vessel.
       d. Overfilling.  Release due to filling a pipe, vessel, or other container past its capacity.
       e. Rupture Disk/Relief Valve.  Release due to failure of a rupture disk/relief valve to
       function properly. A rupture disk/relief valve is a valve that relieves pressure beyond a
       specified limit; a relief valve closes upon return to normal operating conditions.
       f. Excess Flow Valve Failure. Release caused by the failure of excess flow device to
       function properly and prevent surges from reaching downstream equipment.
       g. Other (specify)

3.5. Quantity released (Ibs). Enter the quantity of toxic chemical you used for your alternative

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 22

-------
 scenario analysis in pounds to 2 significant digits.  If you have less than 1 pound released, round
 up to 1 pound.  You may want to clarify that in your Executive Summary.

 3.6. Release rate (Ibs/minute). Enter the rate of release to the outside air in pounds per minute
 to 1 significant digit. For example:
       4.3 pounds per minuteshould be reported as... 4 pounds per minute
       19 pounds per minute should be reported as... 20 pounds per minute

 For gases, a gas liquefied by pressurization alone, or a gas liquefied by refrigeration where the
 released refrigerated liquid forms a pool of 1 cm or less in depth, the release rate should be the
 total quantity released divided by 10 minutes (this is a regulatory requirement) and multiplied by
 the appropriate mitigation factor if a mitigated release.   See Chapter 4 of the General Guidance
for Risk Management Programs for more information.

 3.7. Release duration (minutes). Indicate the length of time in minutes to the nearest minute
 for the released quantity to be released to the outside air (from the time the release starts to the
 time it is mitigated or stopped).  See Chapter 4 of the General Guidance for Risk Management
 Programs  for more information.

 3.8. Wind speed (meters/second).  If you used the OCA Guidance or one of EPA's model
 program guidance documents, indicate 3 meters per second. If you modeled your scenario
 separately, indicate the wind speed used.

 3.9. Atmospheric Stability Class. If you used the OCA Guidance or one of EPA's model
 program guidance documents, list "D" stability. If you modeled your scenario separately,
 indicate the stability class used.

 3.10. Topography (select one).  Indicate whether the local topography is urban or rural.  Urban
 means that there are many obstacles in the immediate area; obstacles include buildings or trees.
 Rural means that the terrain is generally flat and unobstructed in the immediate area.

 3.11. Distance to endpoint (miles). Indicate the distance to the endpoint in miles to 2
 significant digits, using the endpoint specified for the chemical in 40 CFR Part 68, Appendix A.
 Convert your modeling results into miles by dividing the distance in feet by 5280 or yards by
 1760.  Refer to the following to determine 2 significant digits:
           .397 miles        should be reported as...        .40 miles
         9.345 miles        should be reported as...       9.3 miles
        20.764 miles        should be reported as...       21 miles

 3.12. Residential population within distance to endpoint. Estimate the population within the
 circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius  determined by the distance to the
 endpoint to two significant digits (e.g., 5,500 people rather than 5,483). Population estimates
 include only residential populations.
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 23

-------
3.13. Public receptors within distance to endpoint. Public receptors must be identified within
the circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the distance to the
endpoint.  Public receptor means locations where members of the public may be exposed to toxic
concentrations, radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release. Public receptors include
locations within the facility's property boundary to which the public has routine and unrestricted
access during or outside business hours (e.g. a recreation field). Locations inhabited or occupied
by the public at any time without restriction by the source (such as fences or security guards) are
public receptors (see the General Guidance for Risk Management Programs for more
information on identifying public receptors). You do not need to list specific locations or
estimate populations at these locations. The presence of these receptors may be determined
using local street maps.  Select all that apply.
       a. Schools. Public and private elementary, secondary, or post-secondary educational
       institutions (e.g., colleges).
       b. Residences
       c. Hospitals
       d. Prisons or  Correctional facilities
       e. Recreation areas. Including stadiums, parks, and public pools.
       f. Commercial, office, or industrial areas.  Including industrial parks, office buildings,
       shopping malls, commercial areas,  and commercial  farms.
       g. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.

3.14. Environmental receptors within distance to endpoint.  Environmental receptors must be
identified within the circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the
distance to the endpoint.  Environmental receptor means natural areas,  such as national or state
parks, forests,  or monuments; officially designated wildlife sanctuaries, preserves, refuges, or
areas; and federal wilderness areas, that could be exposed at any time to toxic concentrations,
radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release.  Environmental receptors can be identified
on local U.S. Geological Survey maps, which can be found at many libraries. Select all that
apply.
       a. National or state parks, forests, or monuments
       b. Officially designated wildlife sanctuaries,  preserves, or refuges
       c. Federal wilderness areas
       d. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.

3.15. Passive mitigation considered. Select all passive mitigation measures that were
considered in defining the release quantity or rate of the alternative release scenario.
       a. Dikes. A low wall that acts as a barrier to prevent a spill from spreading.
       b. Enclosures. Physical containment of the release within a structure (e.g., a building).
       c. Berms.  A mound or wall of earth at the top or bottom of a slope that prevents a spill
       from spreading.
       d. Drains.  A channel that carries off surface water.
       e. Sumps.  A pit or tank that catches liquid runoff for drainage or disposal.
       f. Other (specify). List a type other than what is listed above.
                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 24

-------
3.16. Active mitigation considered. Active mitigation means equipment, devices, or
technologies that need human, mechanical, or other energy input to function.  By regulation,
active mitigation can be considered in determining the alternative scenario, but not in
determining the worst case scenario. Select all that were considered in defining the release
quantity or rate of the alternative release scenario.

       a. Sprinkler systems. A system for protecting a building against fire by means of
       overhead pipes which convey an extinguishing fluid through heat activated outlets.
       b. Deluge systems.  A system to overflow an area of a release with water or other
       extinguishing fluid.
       c. Water curtain. A spray of water from a horizontal pipe through nozzles; the curtain
       may be activated manually or automatically.
       d. Neutralization.  Making a toxic chemical harmless through chemical reaction.
       e. Excess flow valve. A device in the outlet of a vessel at a hose connection that stops
       the flow of liquid or gas if the piping or hoses downstream fail and a predetermined
       excess flow rate is reached.
       f. Flares. A device for disposing of combustible gases from a chemical process by
       burning them in the open.
       g. Scrubbers. A pre-release protection measure that uses water or aqueous mixtures
       containing scrubbing reagents to remove discharging liquids and possibly also treating
       the discharging chemical.
       h. Emergency shutdown systems. Controls that are triggered when process limits are
       exceeded and that shut down that process.
       i. Other (specify)

3.17. Graphics file name (Optional).  You may submit one graphic file to illustrate each release
scenario. Click to the button to the right of the Graphic File field (the  button with three dots).
Locate the graphic file, and press "Open."

Graphics will be accepted in either GIF  or JPEG file format. See 2.23 for an explanation of GIF
and JPEG.
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 25

-------
Section 4     Flammables:  Worst-Case
Complete this section for each flammable worst-case scenario you report.

4.1. Chemical.  Enter the name of the regulated flammable chemical you evaluated in the worst-
case scenario.

4.2. Model used (select one).   Select the source of your results for your worst-case release
analysis or enter another model name in "Other."
       a. EPA's OCA Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
       c. EPA's RMP Guidance for Propane Storage Facilities Reference Tables or Equations
       d. EPA's RMP Guidance for Waste Water Treatment Plants Reference Tables or
       Equations
       e. EPA's RMP Guidance for Warehouses Reference Tables or Equations
       f. EPA's RMP Guidance for Chemical Distributors Reference Tables or Equations
       g. EPA's RMP*Comp™
       z. Other model (specify)

4.3. Scenario.  This data element is fixed. By regulation, for flammables, the worst case
assumes an instantaneous release and a vapor cloud explosion, which is an explosion of a cloud
containing a flammable vapor or gas and air.

4.4. Quantity released (Ibs). Enter the quantity of flammable substance you used for your
worst-case scenario analysis in pounds to 2 significant digits.  This is the total amount that would
be lost from a vessel or pipeline used in the calculation of distance to 1 psi reported in 4.6.  See
Chapter 2 on Determining Worst-Case Scenarios in the RMP Offsite  Consequence Analysis
Guidance for more details. Here's how to report the quantity to 2 significant digits:
         5,333 pounds              should be reported as...      5,300 pounds
       107,899 pounds              should be reported as...      110,000 pounds

If you have less than 1 pound released, round up to 1 pound. You may want to clarify that in
your Executive  Summary.

4.5. Endpoint used. This data element is fixed. Because the scenario is fixed by regulation as
vapor cloud explosions, the endpoint which  applies to vapor cloud explosions is fixed at 1 psi
overpressure.

4.6. Distance to endpoint (miles). Indicate the distance to the endpoint in miles to 2 significant
digits, using the endpoint specified for the chemical in 40 CFR Part 68, Appendix A. Convert
your modeling results into miles by dividing the distance  in feet by 5280 or yards by 1760.
Refer to the following to determine 2 significant digits:
          .397 miles        should be reported as...        .40 miles
         9.345 miles        should be reported as...       9.3 miles
        20.764 miles        should be reported as...       21 miles
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 26

-------
4.7. Residential population within distance to endpoint. Estimate the population within the
circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the distance to the
endpoint to two significant digits (e.g., 5,500 people rather than 5,483). Population estimates
include only residential populations.

4.8. Public receptors within distance to endpoint.  Public receptors must be identified within
the circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the distance to the
endpoint. Public receptor means locations where members of the public may be exposed to toxic
concentrations, radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release. Public receptors include
locations within the facility's property boundary to which the public has routine and unrestricted
access during or outside business hours (e.g. a recreation field). Locations inhabited or occupied
by the public at any time without restriction by the source (such as fences or security guards) are
public receptors (see the  General Guidance for Risk Management Programs for more
information on identifying public receptors). You do not need to list specific locations or
estimate populations at these locations. The presence of these receptors may be determined
using local street maps.  Select all that apply.
       a. Schools. Public and private elementary, secondary, or post-secondary educational
       institutions (e.g., colleges).
       b. Residences
       c. Hospitals
       d. Prisons or Correctional facilities
       e. Recreation areas. Including stadiums, parks, and public pools.
       f. Commercial, office, or industrial areas.  Including industrial parks, office buildings,
       shopping malls, commercial areas, and commercial farms.
       g. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.

4.9. Environmental receptors within distance to endpoint. Environmental receptors must be
identified within the circle with a center at the point  of the release and a radius determined by the
distance to the endpoint.  Environmental receptor means natural areas, such as national or state
parks, forests,  or monuments; officially designated wildlife sanctuaries, preserves, refuges, or
areas; and federal wilderness areas, that could be exposed at any time to toxic concentrations,
radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release.  Environmental receptors can be identified
on local U.S. Geological Survey maps, which can be found at many libraries. Select all that
apply.
       a. National or state parks, forests, or monuments
       b. Officially designated wildlife sanctuaries,  preserves, or refuges
       c. Federal wilderness areas
       d. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.

4.10. Passive mitigation considered.  Select all passive mitigation measures that were
considered in defining the release quantity or rate for the worst-case scenario.
       a. Blast Walls. A heavy wall used to isolate buildings or areas that contain highly
       combustible or explosive materials.
       b. Other (specify)

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 27

-------
4.11.  Graphics file name (Optional). You may submit one graphic file to illustrate each
release scenario. Click to the button to the right of the Graphic File field (the button with three
dots). Locate the graphic  file, and press "Open."

Graphics will be accepted in either GIF or JPEG file format. See 2.16 of this manual for an
explanation of GIF and JPEG.
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 28

-------
Section 5: Flammables: Alternative Releases

Complete this section for each flammable alternative release scenario you report.

5.1. Chemical.  Enter the name of the regulated flammable chemical you evaluated in the
alternative release scenario.

5.2. Model used (select one).   Select the source of your results for your alternative release
analysis or enter another model name in "Other."
       a. EPA's OCA Guidance Reference Tables or Equations
       c. EPA's RMP Guidance for Propane Storage Facilities Reference Tables or Equations
       d. EPA's RMP Guidance for Waste Water Treatment Plants Reference Tables or
       Equations
       e. EPA's RMP Guidance for Warehouses Reference Tables or Equations
       f. EPA's RMP Guidance for Chemical Distributors Reference Tables or Equations
       g. EPA's RMP*Comp™
       z. Other model (specify)

5.3. Scenario.  Select one of the following or enter another scenario in Other:
       a. Vapor Cloud Explosion. An explosion of a cloud containing a flammable vapor or
       gas and air.
       b. Fireball. The atmospheric burning of a fuel-air cloud in which the energy is mostly
       emitted in the form of radiant heat. As the buoyancy forces of the hot gases begin to
       dominate, the burning cloud rises and becomes spherical in shape.  Often caused by the
       ignition  of a vapor cloud of a flammable substance.
       c. BLEVE. Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion (BLEVE) is used to describe the
       sudden rupture of a vessel/system containing liquefied flammable gas under pressure due
       to radiant heat flux.  The pressure burst and the flashing of the liquid to vapor creates a
       blast wall and potential missile damage, and immediate ignition of the expanding fuel-air
       mixture  leads to an intense combustion creating a fireball.
       d. Pool Fire. The combustion of material evaporating from a layer of liquid at the base
       of the fire.
       e. Jet Fire. Gas or liquid discharging or venting from a rupture will form a jet that
       "blows"  into the atmosphere in the direction the hole is facing, all the while entraining
       and mixing with air.  If the jet is flammable and encounters an ignition source, a flame jet
       may form.
       f. Vapor Cloud Fire. A flash fire results from the ignition of a released flammable cloud
       in which there is essentially no increase in the combustion rate.
       g. Other (specify)

5.4. Quantity released (Ibs).  Enter the quantity of the flammable substance you used for your
alternative scenario analysis in pounds to 2 significant digits. If you have less than 1 pound
released, round  up to 1 pound. You may want to clarify that in your Executive Summary.
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 29

-------
5.5. Endpoint used. For vapor cloud explosions, the endpoint is 1 psi overpressure; for a
fireball the endpoint is 5 kW/m2 for 40 seconds; for vapor cloud fires or jet fires, a lower
flammability limit (expressed as a percentage) may be listed as  specified in NFPA documents or
other generally recognized sources.  These are listed in the OCA Guidance.

5.6. Distance to endpoint (miles). Indicate the distance to the  endpoint in miles to 2 significant
digits, using the endpoint specified for the chemical in 40 CFR Part 68, Appendix A.  Convert
your modeling results into miles by dividing the distance in feet by 5280 or yards by 1760.
Refer to the following to determine 2 significant digits:
           .397 miles        should be reported as...       .40 miles
         9.345 miles        should be reported as...      9.3  miles
        20.764 miles        should be reported as...      21 miles

5.7. Residential population within distance to endpoint. Estimate the population within the
circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius  determined by the distance to the
endpoint to two significant digits (e.g., 5,500 people rather than 5,483). Population estimates
include only residential populations.

5.8. Public receptors within distance to endpoint.  Public receptors must be identified within
the circle with a center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the distance to the
endpoint. Public receptor means locations where members of the public may be exposed to toxic
concentrations, radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release.  Public receptors include
locations within the facility's property boundary to which the public has routine and unrestricted
access during or outside business hours (e.g. a recreation field). Locations inhabited or occupied
by the public at any time without restriction by the source (such as fences or security guards) are
public receptors (see the General Guidance for Risk Management Programs for more
information on identifying public receptors).  You do not need to list specific locations or
estimate populations at these locations. The presence of these receptors may be determined
using local street maps.  Select all that apply.
       a. Schools. Public and private elementary, secondary, or post-secondary educational
       institutions (e.g., colleges).
       b. Residences
       c. Hospitals
       d. Prisons or  Correctional facilities
       e. Recreation areas. Including stadiums, parks, and public pools.
       f. Commercial, office, or industrial areas.  Including industrial parks, office buildings,
       shopping malls, commercial areas, and commercial farms.
       g. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.

5.9. Environmental receptors within distance to endpoint. Environmental receptors must be
identified within the circle with a center at the point  of the release and a radius determined by the
distance to the endpoint.  Environmental receptor means natural areas, such as national or state
parks, forests, or monuments; officially designated wildlife sanctuaries, preserves, refuges, or
areas; and federal wilderness areas, that could be exposed at any time to toxic concentrations,

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 30

-------
radiant heat, or overpressure as a result of the release. Environmental receptors can be identified
on local U.S. Geological Survey maps, which can be found at many libraries. Select all that
apply.
       a. National or state parks, forests, or monuments
       b. Officially designated wildlife sanctuaries, preserves, or refuges
       c. Federal wilderness areas
       d. Other (Specify). Include any other additional information here.

5.10. Passive mitigation considered. Select all passive mitigation measures that were
considered in defining the release quantity or rate for the alternative scenario.
       a. Dikes. A low wall that acts as a barrier to prevent a spill from spreading.
       b. Fire Walls. A wall constructed to prevent the spread of fire.
       c. Blast Walls.  A heavy wall used to isolate buildings or areas that contain highly
       combustible or explosive materials.
       d. Enclosures.  Physical containment of the release within a structure (e.g., a building).
       f. Other (specify)

5.11. Active mitigation considered. Active mitigation means equipment, devices, or
technologies that need human, mechanical, or other energy input to function. Select all that were
considered in defining the release quantity or rate of the alternative release scenario.
       a. Sprinkler Systems. A system for protecting a building against fire by means of
       overhead pipes which convey an extinguishing fluid through heat activated outlets.
       b. Deluge Systems. A system to overflow an area of a release with water or other
       extinguishing fluid.
       c. Water Curtain. A spray of water from a horizontal pipe through nozzles, the curtain
       may be activated manually or automatically.
       d. Excess Flow Valve. A system for diverting overflow.
       e. Other (specify)

5.12.  Graphics file name (Optional). You may submit one graphic file to illustrate each
release scenario. Click to the button to the right of the Graphic File field (the button with three
dots). Locate the graphic file, and press "Open."

Graphics will be accepted in either GIF or JPEG file format. See 2.16 of this manual for an
explanation of GIF and JPEG.
                                                                                Ch. 2Pg. 31

-------
Section 6:    Five-year accident history

Although much of the RMP is a summary of the risk management program at your facility, this
portion of the RMP includes all of the five-year accident history information required under 40
CFR § 68.42. Therefore, for this section of the RMP you can simply insert the data you
compiled for § 68.42. Only report accidents involving listed substances.

A reportable accident involves a part 68 regulated substance in a covered process if the release
resulted in deaths, injuries, property damage onsite, or known offsite deaths, injuries, property
damage, or environmental damage, evacuations, or sheltering-in-place.

Did your facility have any reportable accidents in the last 5 years?  If your facility did not
have any reportable accidents in the last five years, then check no to confirm and leave the rest
of this section blank.  If your facility did have reportable accidents in the last five years, then fill
in this section for each accident.

6.1. Date of accident. Indicate the date on which the accident occurred.

6.2. Time accident began.  Indicate the time the release began.

6.3. NAICS Code of process involved. Enter the NAICS code that most closely corresponds to
the process; it will not necessarily be the same NAICS code for your facility as a whole. As
described in Registration, the NAICS code system classifies businesses by fitting them into
descriptive categories that correspond to five-digit or six-digit codes. Appendix B of the
General Guidance for Risk Management Programs provides the NAICS codes for the industry
sectors most likely to subject to 40 CFR Part 68.  You may also access the full list on-line at
http://www. census.gov/epcd/www/naics. html.

Although you are only required to report accidents on covered processes, you may choose to
report other accidents as well.  Therefore, RMP*Submit provides the full list of NAICS codes to
choose from.

6.4. Release duration.  Indicate the approximate length of time of the release in hours and
minutes. (Format: HHHMM)

6.5.a.i. Chemical name. Indicate the regulated substance(s) released. Use the name of the
substance as listed in Section 68.130 rather than a synonym. If the release was a NFPA-4
flammable mixture containing regulated flammables, you may list it as a "flammable mixture"
and list all of the regulated substances contained in the mixture.  For the quantity released, you
only report the quantity of the entire mixture, not the individual substances.  Only report
chemicals that are listed  substances.

6.5.a.ii. CAS number.  Provide the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number for each
chemical name in 6.5.a.i. above. CAS numbers are listed in 40 CFR § 68.130 and in EPA's

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 32

-------
General Guidance for Risk Management Programs . RMP*Submit will automatically generate
the CAS # based on the chemical name chosen.  For flammable mixtures, because there is no
CAS #, leave this field blank.  RMP*Submit will assign a "dummy" CAS number of all zeros for
flammable mixtures.

6.5.b. Quantity released.  Estimate the amount of each substance released in pounds. The
amount should be estimated to two significant digits, or as close to that as possible. For
example, if you estimate that the release was between 850 and 900 pounds, provide a best guess.
We realize that you may not know precise quantities.

For toxics in a mixture, determine the maximum quantity of the mixture and then multiply the
weight of the regulated toxic substance to determine the quantity; do not report the weight of
the entire mixture. For example, if you have a 100,000 pound mixture of ammonia at 20%
concentration, then you would multiply the weight percent (20%) by the total quantity (100,000
pounds) to determine the quantity released of ammonia was 20,000 pounds.

For flammables in a mixture that meets the criteria of NFPA-4, report the entire quantity of the
mixture, rather than that of the individual regulated substances.

6.5.c. Percent weight of toxic chemical in mixture.  If a toxic substance was in  a mixture when
released, indicate the percentage weight of the regulated substance in the mixture.

6.6. Release event. Indicate which of the following release events best describes your accident.
Select at least one:
       a. Gas Release.  A gas release is a release of the substance as a gas (rather than
       vaporized from a liquid).  If you hold a gas liquefied under refrigeration, report the
       release as a liquid spill.
       b. Liquid Spill/Evaporation. A liquid spill/ evaporation is a release of the substance in
       a liquid state with subsequent vaporization.
       c. Fire.  A fire is a combustion producing light, flames, and heat.
       d. Explosion. An explosion is a rapid chemical reaction with the production of noise,
       heat, and violent expansion of gases.
       e. Uncontrolled /runaway  reaction. A release event caused by an uncontrolled
       chemical reaction that  generates excessive heat, pressure, or harmful reaction products.
       Such events may involve highly exothermic chemical reactions, self-reactive substances
       (e.g., substances that undergo polymerization), unstable, explosive, or spontaneously
       combustible substances, substances that react strongly with water or other contaminants,
       oxidizers, peroxide-forming substances,  or other types of chemical reactions that generate
       harmful products or byproducts. This category of release event may  often occur in
       conjunction with one of the previous  categories. In such cases, be sure to check this
       category in addition to any other applicable release event category (e.g., explosion).  The
       burning of ordinary flammable substances is not typically included in this category.

6.7. Release source.  Indicate all that apply.

                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 33

-------
       a. Storage Vessel.  A storage vessel is a container used only to store or hold (as opposed
       to react, mix, or move) a regulated substance. Storage vessels include transportation
       containers (e.g., railcars or tank trucks) being used for on-site storage.
       b. Piping. Piping refers to a system of pipes used to carry a fluid (gas, liquid or solid
       solution, etc.).
       c. Process Vessel.  A process vessel is a container in which regulated substances under
       certain conditions (eg. Temperature, pressure) participate in a process (substances are
       manufactured, blended to forma mixture, reacted to convert them into some other final
       product or form, or heated to purify).
       d. Transfer Hose.  A transfer hose is a flexible tube used to connect, often temporarily,
       two or more vessels.
       e. Valve. A valve is a device used to regulate the flow in piping systems or machinery.
       Relief valves open to release pressure in vessels.
       f. Pump. A pump is a device that raises, transfers, or compresses fluids or that attenuates
       gases by suction or pressure or both.
       g. Joint. The surface at which two or more mechanical components are united.
       h. Other.  Specify other source of the release.

6.8. Weather conditions at time of event (if known). This information is important to those
concerned with modeling the effects of accidents.  Reliable information from those involved in
the incident or from an on-site weather station is ideal. However, the rule does not require your
facility to have an on-site weather station. If you do not  have an on-site weather station, use
information from your local weather station, airport, or other source of meteorological data.
Historical wind speed and temperature data (but not stability  data) can be obtained from the
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) at (828) 271-4800; NCDC staff can also provide
information on the nearest weather station. To the extent possible, complete the following:

       a.i. Wind speed. Wind speed is an estimate of how fast the wind is traveling.

       a.ii. Wind speed units. Indicate the units in which the speed is expressed as either miles
       per hour, meters per second, or knots.

       a.iii. Wind direction. Wind direction is the direction from which  the wind comes. For
       example, a wind that blows from east to west would be described as having an eastern
       wind direction. Describe wind direction as one of the  16 standard compass readings [N,
       S, E, W, NE, SE, NW, SW, NNE, ENE, ESE, SSE, SSW, WSW, WNW, NNW], using
       the abbreviation. For example, wind direction must be reported as  S for South, NE for
       Northeast, or SSW for South-Southwest.

       b. Temperature. The ambient temperature at the scene of the accident in degrees
       Fahrenheit. If you did not keep a record, you can use the high (for  daytime releases) or
       low (nighttime releases) for the day. Local newspapers publish these data.

       c. Atmospheric Stability Class.  Depending on the amount of incoming solar radiation

                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 34

-------
       as well as other factors, the atmosphere may be more or less turbulent at any given time.
       Meteorologists have defined six atmospheric stability classes, each representing a
       different degree of turbulence in the atmosphere.  When moderate to strong incoming
       solar radiation heats air near the ground, causing it to rise and generating large eddies, the
       atmosphere is considered unstable, or relatively turbulent. Unstable conditions are
       associated with  stability classes A and B.  When solar radiation is relatively weak, air
       near the surface has less of a tendency to rise and less turbulence develops.  In this case,
       the atmosphere is considered stable or less turbulent with weak winds; the stability class
       is E or F. Stability classes D and C represent conditions of more neutral stability, or
       moderate turbulence. Neutral conditions are associated with relatively strong wind
       speeds and moderate solar radiation. Enter either A, B, C, D, E, or F.

                          Exhibit 7. Atmospheric Stability Classes
SURFACE WIND SPEED
AT 10 METERS
ABOVE GROUND

Meters per
second
<2
2-3
3-5
5-6
>6

Miles per
hour
<4.5
4.5-7
7-11
11-13
>13
DAY


Incoming Solar Radiation

Strong**
A
A-B
B
C
C
Moderate
A-B
B
B-C
C-D
D
Slight***
B
C
C
D
D
NIGHT*


Thinly
Overcast
or • '4/8
low cloud

E
D
D
D
••3/8
Cloud


F
E
D
D
*Night refers to one hour before sunset to one hour after dawn.
** Sun high in the sky with no clouds.
*** Sun low in the sky with no clouds.

       d. Precipitation present.  Precipitation may take the form of hail, mist, rain, sleet, or
       snow. Check the box to indicate there was precipitation at the time of the accident.

       e. Unknown weather conditions. If you have no record for any of the weather data,
       indicate "unknown." We realize that you may not have weather data for accidents that
       have occurred prior to June 1996.  You must, however, collect these data during future
       accident investigations.

6.9. On-site impacts. Complete each of the following about on-site effects.  Enter a number for
each entry; if there were no impacts, enter 0.
                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 35

-------
       a. Deaths.  Indicate the number of on-site deaths that are attributable to the accident or
       mitigation activities. On-site deaths include anyone (employees, contractors, responders,
       or others) who was killed by direct exposure to toxic concentrations, radiant heat, or
       overpressures from the accidental release or from indirect consequences of a vapor cloud
       explosion from an accidental release (e.g., flying glass debris or other projectiles).  If
       there were no on-site deaths, enter 0.  Specify the deaths as:
              a.i.  Employees & contract employees
              a.ii. Public responders (example, fire department personnel)
              a.iii. Public (example, visitors)

       b. Injuries. An injury is any effect that results either from direct exposure to toxic
       concentrations, radiant heat, or overpressures from the accidental release or from indirect
       consequences of a vapor cloud explosion from an accidental release (e.g., a window
       shattering after an explosion) and that requires medical treatment or hospitalization.
       Medical treatment means treatment, other than first aid, administered by a physician or
       registered professional personnel under standing orders from a physician (OSHA Oil
       Log, 1904.12). Your OSHA occupational injury and illness log will help complete these
       items for employees. If there were no on-site injuries,  enter 0.  Specify the injuries as:
              a.i.  Employees & contract employees
              a.ii. Public responders (example, fire department personnel)
              a.iii. Public (example, visitors)

       c. Property damage.  Estimate the value of the equipment or business  structures at your
       facility that were damaged by the accident or mitigation activities.  Record the value in
       American dollars. Insurance claims may provide this information.  Do  not include any
       losses that you may have incurred as a result of business interruption. If there was no on-
       site property damage or  no known damage, enter 0.

6.10. Known off-site impacts.  These are impacts that you should be aware of (e.g., from media
reports) or that were reported to your facility. You are not required to  conduct an additional
investigation to determine off-site impacts. Enter a number for each entry; if there were no
impacts, enter 0.

       a. Deaths.  Indicate the number of off-site deaths that are attributable to the accident or
       mitigation activities. Off-site deaths include anyone who was killed by direct exposure to
       toxic concentrations, radiant heat, or overpressures from the accidental  release or from
       indirect consequences of a vapor cloud  explosion from an accidental release (e.g., a
       window shattering after  an explosion).  Responders killed while on site responding to the
       release are  considered on-site deaths and should not be reported here (See 6.9. On-Site
       Impacts). If there were no known off-site deaths, enter 0.

       b. Hospitalizations. Indicate the number of people requiring hospitalization.
       Hospitalization means any effect that results either from direct exposure to toxic
       concentrations, radiant heat, or overpressures from accidental releases or from indirect

                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 36

-------
       consequences of a vapor cloud explosion from an accidental release (e.g., a window
       shattering after an explosion) and that requires hospitalization (i.e., admittance to the
       hospital). If there were no known off-site hospitalizations, enter 0.

       c. Other medical treatment. Indicate the number of people requiring medical treatment.
       Medical treatment means any effect that results either from direct exposure to toxic
       concentrations, radiant heat, or overpressures from accidental releases or from indirect
       consequences of a vapor cloud explosion from an accidental release (e.g., a window
       shattering after an explosion) and that requires medical treatment.  If there was no known
       medical treatment, enter 0.

       d. Evacuated. Estimate the number of people who were evacuated to prevent exposure
       that might have resulted from the accident. A total count of the number of people
       evacuated is preferable to the number of houses evacuated.   People who were ordered to
       move simply to improve access to the site for emergency vehicles are not considered to
       have been evacuated, but people who normally-occupy a building or area and who are
       prevented from entering or returning (i.e., blockaded) in order to prevent potentially
       harmful exposure should be  considered to have been evacuated. If there were no
       evacuations, enter 0.

       e. Sheltered-in-place. Estimate the number of people who were sheltered-in-place
       during the accident.  Sheltering-in-place occurs when the incident commander orders
       residents to remain inside their home or place of work until the emergency has ended to
       prevent exposure to the substance.  Usually these are associated with an emergency
       broadcast or similar method of mass notification by response agencies.  If no one
       sheltered in place, enter 0.

       f. Property damage. Estimate the value of the equipment or structures offsite that were
       damaged by the accident or mitigation activities.  Record the value in American dollars.
       Insurance claims may provide this information. Any level of offsite property damage
       triggers reporting. There is no lower limit below which you would not have to report.  If
       there was no property damage, enter 0.

       g. Environmental damage. Indicate whether any environmental damage occurred and
       specify the type.  The damage is  not limited to environmental receptors listed in the rule.
       Any damage to the environment  (e.g., dead or injured animals, defoliation, water
       contamination) must be reported. Select all that apply.
              g. 1.    Fish or animal kills.
              g.2.    Tree, lawn, shrub, or crop damage
              g.4.    Water contamination
              g.4.    Soil contamination
              g.5.    Other (specify)

6.11. Initiating event.  Select the one initiating event that best describes the immediate cause of

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 37

-------
the accident.
       a. Equipment Failure. A device or piece of equipment failed or did not function as
       designed.  For example, the vessel wall corroded or cracked.
       b. Human Error.  An operator performed a task improperly, either by failing to take the
       necessary  steps or by taking the wrong steps.
       c. Natural (weather conditions, earthquake). Weather conditions, such as lightning,
       hail, ice storms, tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or high winds, caused the
       accident.
       d. Unknown.

6.12. Contributing factors. These are factors that contributed to the accident occurring, but
were not the initiating event. If you conducted an investigation of the release, you should have
identified factors that led to the initiating event.  Select all that apply.

       a. Equipment failure.  A device or piece of equipment failed to contain substance or did
       not function as designed, thereby allowing a substance to be released.

       b. Human error. A person performed an operation improperly or made a mistake which
       resulted in an accident.

       c. Improper procedures.  The procedure did not reflect the proper method of operation,
       the procedure omitted steps that affected the accident, or the procedure was written in a
       manner that allowed for misinterpretation of the instructions.

       d. Overpressurization.  The process was operated at pressures exceeding the design
       working pressure.

       e. Upset condition. Release was caused by incorrect process conditions (e.g., increased
       tpmnpratiirp r\r nrpeeiirp^
    •
temperature or pressure).
       f. By-pass condition.  The failure occurred in a pipe, channel, or valve that diverts fluid
       flow from the main pathway when design process or storage conditions are exceeded
       (e.g., overpressure). By-pass conditions may be designed to release the substance to
       restore acceptable process or storage conditions and prevent more severe consequences
       (e.g., explosion).

       g. Maintenance activity or inactivity.  The failure occurred because of maintenance
       activity or inactivity. An example of maintenance activity is putting the wrong gasket on
       a tank fitting. An example of maintenance inactivity is storage racks that remained
       unpainted for so long that corrosion caused the metal to fail.

       h. Process design failure. The failure resulted from an inherent flaw in the design of the
       process (e.g., pressure needed to make product exceeds the design pressure of the vessel).
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 38

-------
       i. Unsuitable equipment. The equipment used was incorrect for the process.  For
       example, the forklift was too large for the corridors.

       j. Unusual weather conditions.  Weather conditions, such as lightning, hail, ice storms,
       tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, or high winds caused the accident.

       k. Management error. The failure occurred due to any management error or
       management system error not included in categories a through] above.  Such factors may
       include inadequate training,  inadequate oversight, inadequate hazard analysis,  or other
       management-related factors.

       1. Other (specify)

6.13. Off-site responders notified (select one).  Indicate whether response agencies (e.g.,
police, fire, medical services) were notified. Check one of the following choices:
       a. Notified Only
       b. Notified and Responded
       c. No, not notified
       d. Unknown.

6.14. Changes introduced as a result of the accident  Indicate any measures that you have
taken at the facility to prevent recurrence of the accident.  Select at least one.
       a. Improved/upgraded equipment. A device or piece of equipment that did not
       function as designed was repaired or replaced.
       b. Revised maintenance. Maintenance procedures were clarified or changed to ensure
       appropriate and timely maintenance including inspection and testing (i.e., increasing the
       frequency of inspection or adding a testing method).
       c. Revised training. Training programs were clarified or changed to ensure that
       employees and contract employees are aware of and are practicing correct safety and
       administrative procedures.
       d. Revised operating procedures.  Operating procedures were clarified or changed to
       ensure that employees  and contract employees are trained on appropriate operating
       procedures.
       e. New process controls. New process designs and controls were installed to correct
       problems and prevent recurrence of an accidental release.
       f. New mitigation systems.  New mitigation systems were initiated to limit the severity
       of accidental releases.
       g. Revised emergency response plan.  The emergency response plan was revised.
       h. Changed process. Process was altered to reduce the risk (e.g., process chemistry was
       changed).
       i. Reduced  inventory. Inventory was reduced at the facility to reduce the potential
       release quantities and the magnitude of the hazard.
       j. None. No changes initiated at facility as a result of the accident (i.e., none were
       necessary or technically feasible). There may be some accidents that could not have been

                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 39

-------
prevented because they were caused by events that are too rare to merit additional steps.
For example, if a tornado hit your facility and you are located in an area where tornados
are very rare, it may not be reasonable to design a "tornado-proof process even if it is
technically feasible.
k. Other (specify).
                                                                         Ch. 2 Pg. 40

-------
Overview of Prevention Program (Sections 7-8)

How Must Prevention Program Data Be Reported?

Prevention program data must be reported on a process-by-process basis. In other words, you
must fill out the prevention program section of the RMP for each Program 2 or Program 3
process you have that is subject to the RMP rule.

How to report the prevention program for a process depends on how many units the process
contains and whether the prevention program applies different safeguards to different units in the
process. The RMP rule broadly defines "process" to include interconnected or co-located
production and storage units. Under the definition, multiple units and, in some cases, whole
sources may be a single "process" for purposes of the RMP rule.  For multiple unit processes,
EPA recognizes that prevention program implementation may involve different safeguards for
different units in the process. For example, different production units may have different
operating procedures. At the same time, some safeguards, such as management of change
procedures, may apply to all the units in the process. To accommodate these circumstances,
RMP*Submit includes two features which make it easier to indicate how a prevention program
applies to a multiple-unit process.

If your process consists of two or more units and different safeguards apply to different units in
that process, you can report the prevention program for that process in one of the two following
ways. You must, however, use one of the two ways to report your program.

       Use the description field in the prevention program to describe in narrative form how
       your prevention program is implemented with respect to the different units in the process.
       You could start by listing the common prevention program elements you implement for
       all  of the units (e.g., use of an alarm system or standard management of change
       procedures). You would then indicate what additional prevention program elements you
       employ for specified units (e.g., use of a dike for certain process units).

       Report your prevention program for the process on a unit-by-unit basis by filling out the
       prevention program portion of the RMP for every unit in the process, rather than for the
       process as a whole.  That way, the differences in the program as  it relates to each unit
       will be clear from the report. However, as noted above, some aspects of a prevention
       program may be common to all units. To simplify the reporting  of common elements,
       RMP*Submit has an autocopy feature that allows you to enter data elements only once.
       This feature works by entering the common elements into RMP*Submit and then hitting
       the COPY function at the bottom of the screen to copy that information to another
       prevention program "record."  (If you are submitting on paper, you can achieve the  same
       effect by filling in the common data elements first and then copying the pages containing
       the common data elements.) To complete the prevention program record for each unit,
       enter the remaining data which is unique to each.
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 41

-------
If your process consists of only one unit or you apply every element of your prevention program
to all the units in the process, you are not required to complete the description section of this
portion of the RMP or report on a unit-by-unit basis. However, you may use the description
field to elaborate on your prevention program.

Many prevention program data elements ask you to enter the date for the most recent "review or
revision" of a prevention program element required by part 68. For your first RMP submission,
if you are subject to prevention program requirements only under the RMP rule (as opposed to
other federal or state laws),  you should enter the date by which you completed the prevention
program element being addressed.  For instance, for data element number 7.5, "Date of most
recent review or revision of operating procedures," you should enter the date by which you met
the operating procedures requirements of section 68.69(a) of the RMP rule (if applicable to you).
 Since this requirement must be met by the time your first RMP is due, you may enter the date
you complete or submit your first RMP.  In the case of data element number 7.3 ("Date on
which safety information was last reviewed or revised")., you should enter the date you met the
requirement of section 68.65(a) (if applicable to you), since section 68.65(a) requires you to
meet the requirement before you conduct the process hazard analysis for the process.

If you are subject to prevention program requirements under other federal or state laws, you may
be in compliance with RMP prevention program requirements as a result of complying with the
other laws.  Sources subject to OSHA PSM, for example, may already meet RMP prevention
program requirements for Program 3 processes, since those requirements are nearly identical to
OSHA PSM prevention program requirements. For your first RMP submission, if you have
fulfilled RMP prevention program requirements in complying with other federal or state laws,
you should enter the date you complied with the requirement or the date you last reviewed or
revised the  relevant aspect of your program, whichever is later. For example, OSHA PSM and
the RMP rule both require covered sources to compile and update (under specified
circumstances) process safety information. If you previously compiled the information for
purposes of complying with OSHA PSM and you have not updated it since, you should enter the
date you compiled it for OSHA in your RMP.  If you have updated the information since
compiling it, you should enter the date of the update.

For subsequent RMP submissions, you should enter the date by which you completed any review
or revision  of a prevention program element.  Several prevention program elements must be
reviewed and, if necessary, revised following a change affecting the process (see, e.g.,
requirement to update safety information in section 68.75(d)). Under the compliance audit
requirement of sections 68.58 or 68.79 of the RMP Program, all  prevention program elements
must be reviewed and, if appropriate, revised every three years.  When you re-submit your next
RMP (due every 5 years or sooner based on the requirements in section 68.190), you are required
to fully update and certify all nine sections of the RMP.  If, by the time you re-submit, you have
reviewed or revised one or more prevention program elements as a result of a change or an audit,
you must enter the date of your review or revision.
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 42

-------
Section 7:    Prevention Program for Program 3 Processes

Complete this section for each prevention program you report for a Program 3 process.

Prevention program description. If different safeguards apply to different units in your
process, use this field to explain how the prevention program for the process relates to the
different units in the process. For example, "This process includes three interconnected
production units, A, B, and C. Everything in this prevention program applies to all three units,
with the following exceptions:
- The dates of the PHA, which are 01/02/97, 6/5/96 and 4/3/96 for units A, B and C, respectively.
- Production unit A uses only a scrubber as a process control, while units B and C have relief
valves and scrubbers.
- The water curtain indicated as a mitigation measure applies only to production unit C."

If you have so many "exceptions" that it gets too complicated to explain as above, but you still
have many common data elements, you can report your prevention program on a unit-by-unit
basis. To simplify such reporting, you can use the autocopy feature in RMP*Submit so that you
only have to enter the common data elements once. First, enter the common elements into
RMP* Submit (or the paper form, if you are submitting in paper), then hit the COPY function at
the bottom of the screen to copy that information to another prevention program "record" (if you
are submitting in paper, photocopy the pages). To complete the prevention program record for
each unit, enter the remaining data which is unique to each.

7.1. NAICS code for the process. Enter the NAICS code that most closely corresponds to the
process; it will not necessarily be the same NAICS code for your facility as a whole. The
NAICS code that you choose must be one that you've already entered in the Registration Section
for the covered process.  If you have two processes with the same NAICS code, explain in the
above description field which of the two processes this prevention program relates to.
RMP* Submit will produce a list of the NAICS codes that you have already entered for your
registered processes as a pick list for this data element. As described in the Registration section
of this manual, the NAICS code system classifies businesses by type using descriptive categories
that correspond to five-digit or six-digit codes.

7.2. Chemical name(s). For each prevention program, provide the names of all regulated
substances held above the threshold in the covered units.  If you have an NFPA-4 flammable
mixture containing regulated flammables, you may list it as a flammable mixture.  You do not
need to list the individual substances in the flammable mixture.

7.3. Date on which the safety information was last reviewed or revised.  The safety
information requirements for Program 3 processes can be found at 40 CFR §68.65.  For your
first RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the requirement of §68.65(a) (compile
safety information) for the process or the date you last reviewed or revised the safety
information, whichever is later. (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date you
enter may depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under other

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 43

-------
federal or state laws.) For subsequent RMPs, enter the date the safety information was most
recently reviewed or revised. Safety information may be reviewed or revised as a result of,
among other things, a change to the process (see §68.75(d)) or a periodic audit of the prevention
program (see §68.79(a)). If the safety information was not reviewed or revised since the
previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in the previous RMP.

7.4. Process Hazard Analysis (PHA).  The PHA requirements for Program 3 processes can be
found at 40 CFR §68.67. Provide the following information about the PHA you conducted for
the process.
       a. Date of last PHA or PHA update.  The date you completed or updated your most
       recent PHA.

       b. Technique used.  Check any of the following techniques that you used to evaluate the
       hazards of your process or part of the process (see Chapter 7, Appendix 7-A, of the
       General Guidance for Risk Management Programs for a description of these techniques).
       Select at least one:
             b.l.  What If
             b.2.  Checklist
             b.3.  What If/Checklist (combined)
             b.4.  HAZOP
             b.5.  Failure Mode & Effects Analysis
             b.6.  Fault Tree Analysis
             b.7.  Other (specify)

       7.4.c. Expected or actual date of completion of all changes resulting from last PHA
       or PHA update.  Enter the date you completed or expect to complete any changes
       resulting from the PHA. This may be blank if there were no changes.

       7.4.d. Major hazards identified (select at least one). Any major hazards that were
       identified for the process  or part of the process as a result of the PHA. Major hazards are
       described below.
  7.4.d. Major Hazard
                        Description
1. Toxic Release
If an accidental release occurred, a regulated toxic substance
could be released. For listed toxics, a toxic release will always be
a major hazard.
2. Fire
Process upsets, leaks, equipment failure, etc., could result in a fire.
For listed flammables, fire will always be a major hazard. Fire
may also be a hazard for some listed toxics, and in some processes
could cause a toxic release.
                                                                             Ch. 2 Pg. 44

-------
7.4.d. Major Hazard
3. Explosion
4. Runaway reaction
5. Polymerization
6. Overpressurization
7. Corrosion
8. Overfilling
9. Contamination
10. Equipment failure
11. Loss of cooling,
heating, electricity,
instrument air
12. Earthquake
13. Floods (Flood Plain)
14. Tornadoes
Description
Confined or unconfmed vapor cloud explosions. For listed
flammables, explosion will generally be a major hazard.
Explosion may also be a hazard for toxics, especially those
handled under extreme conditions.
An uncontrolled reaction that proceeds at an increasing rate.
A chemical reaction that produces the bonding of two or more
monomers.
Instantaneous energy release or detonation.
Corrosion could lead to destruction of equipment and release of a
regulated substance. Corrosion is likely to be a major hazard for
substances identified as corrosives on MSDSs unless the
equipment used limits the hazard.
Filling a tank or vessel beyond its maximum safe capacity.
A release could occur if inappropriate substances are introduced
into storage or process vessels. Contamination may be a major
hazard when controlling inappropriate substances (e.g., H 2O) is
difficult.
Equipment failure is likely to be a major hazard for most
processes, because such failure could lead to a release. Equipment
failure includes cracks, weld failures, disk failures, ruptures,
pump/gauge/control system failures, etc.
These losses could be major hazards if they could lead to a
release. For example, loss of cooling could lead to an increase in
pressure and failure of a vessel or pipe, and a loss of heating or
power could lead to unstable processes. These conditions are less
likely to be major hazards for substances handled at atmospheric
temperatures and pressures.
Report earthquakes as a major hazard only if there is a great
enough risk of their occurring at your site that you plan and design
for them.
Report floods as a major hazard only if there is a great enough risk
of their occurring at your site that you plan and design for them.
Report tornadoes as a major hazard only if there is a great enough
risk of their occurring at your site that you plan and design for
them.
Ch. 2 Pg. 45

-------
7.4.d. Major Hazard
15. Hurricanes
16. Other
Description
Report hurricanes as a major hazard only if there is a great enough
risk of their occurring at your site that you plan and design for
them.
Specify any other major hazards not listed above.
7.4.e. Process controls in use (select at least one).  All of the process controls used on
the process or part of the process. Process controls are equipment and associated
procedures used to prevent or limit releases and are described below.  If none are
applicable, check "none."
7.4.e. Process Controls
1. Vents
2. Relief valves
3. Check valves
4. Scrubbers
5. Flares
6. Manual shutoffs
7. Automatic shutoffs
8. Interlocks
9. Alarms and procedures
10. Keyed bypass
Description
An opening provided for the discharge of pressure or release
of pressure from tanks, vessels, or processing equipment.
A valve that relieves pressure beyond a specified limit and
recloses upon return to normal operating pressure.
A device for automatically limiting the flow in a piping system
to a single direction.
A pre-release protection measure that uses water or aqueous
mixtures containing scrubbing reagents to remove discharging
liquids and may treat the discharging chemical.
A pre-release protection measure used to burn waste gases and
vapors and discharge their combustion products into the
atmosphere.
Manual controls of the shutoff flow to a pipe or vessel.
Controls the shutoff flow to a pipe or vessel and are triggered
automatically when process conditions are exceeded.
A switch or other device that prevents activation of a piece of
equipment when a protective door is open or some other
hazard exists.
Systems that trigger a warning device after the occurrence of a
hazardous condition and procedures to activate an alarm
system.
A bypass system that is activated by a control signal.
                                                                          Ch. 2 Pg. 46

-------
7.4.e. Process Controls
11. Emergency air supply
12. Emergency power
13. Backup pump
14. Grounding equipment
and bonding
15. Inhibitor addition
16. Rupture disks
17. Excess flow device
18. Quench system
19. Purge system
20. None
21. Other
Description
A backup system to provide air to a process when the regular
air supply fails.
Backup power systems.
A secondary pump intended to serve the same function as the
primary pump if the primary pump fails.
Devices that ground and bond electrical equipment to avoid
explosions and to provide a good electrical path to the ground.
A substance that is added to a reaction that is capable of
stopping or retarding a chemical reaction.
A device that relieves pressure beyond a specified limit.
Flow-limiting equipment that protects downstream equipment
from surges.
A system that cools by removing excess heat or immersing
liquid into a cooling medium.
A system that replaces the atmosphere in a container with an
inert substance to prevent the formations of an explosive
mixture.
None are applicable.
Specify any other process controls that you may use on your
process and that are not specified above.
Ch. 2 Pg. 47

-------
      7.4.f. Mitigation systems in use (select at least one). All of the mitigation systems you
      have in place to control a release from the process or part of the process.  Mitigation
      systems are described below. If none are applicable, check "none."
7.4.f. Mitigation Systems
1. Sprinkler systems
2. Dikes
3. Fire walls
4. Blast walls
5. Deluge system
6. Water curtain
7. Enclosure
8. Neutralization
9. None
10. Other
Description
A system for protecting a building against a fire by means of
overhead pipes that release an extinguishing material through
heat activated outlets.
A low wall that acts as a barrier to prevent a spill from
spreading.
A wall constructed to prevent the spread of fire.
A heavy wall used to isolate buildings or areas that contain
highly combustible or explosive materials.
A system to overflow an area with a release of water or other
extinguishing fluid.
A spray of water from a horizontal pipe through nozzles. The
curtain may be activated manually or automatically.
Something that facilitates the physical containment of a
release within a structure (e.g., a building).
Controlling a release by neutralizing the released chemical.
None are applicable.
Specify any other mitigation systems you may have in place
on your process and that are not listed above.
      7.4.g. Monitoring/detection systems in use (select at least one).  All of the monitoring
      and detection systems you have installed to detect a release of a regulated substance from
      the process or part of the process. Monitoring and detection systems are described
      below.  If none are applicable, check "none."
    7.4.g. Monitoring &
    Detection Systems
                       Description
1. Process area detectors
Detection systems located on or close to process equipment.
Detection systems include indicator tubes, and
chromatographic, spectrometric, electrochemical, and
colorimetric gas analysis.
                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 48

-------
2. Perimeter monitors
3. None
4. Other
Integrated detection networks at the source boundary.
Detection systems can include fluorescent SO2 analyzers,
photoelectric tape sensors, or electrolytic chlorine detectors.
None are applicable.
Specify any other monitoring and detection systems you have
in place and that are not listed above.
7.4.h. Changes since last PHA or PHA update (select at least one). All of the changes
made to the process or part of the process since the last PHA.  If none are applicable,
check "none."
7.4.h. Changes Since Last
PHA or PHA Update
1. Reduction in chemical
inventory
2. Increase in chemical
inventory
3. Change in process
parameters
4. Installation of process
controls
5. Installation of process
detection systems
6. Installation of perimeter
monitoring systems
7. Installation of mitigation
systems
8. None recommended
9. None
10. Other
Description
A decrease in the quantity of regulated substances stored
site.
on-
An increase in the quantity of regulated substances stored on-
site.
Examples of changes in process parameters include an
increase or decrease in temperature, pressure, flow rates,
etc.
The addition of controls such as those described in 7.4.e.
The addition of systems such as those described in 7.4. g.
The addition of systems such as those described in 7.4. g.
The addition of systems such as those described in 7.4. f.
Select "none" if the PHA team did not recommend any
changes to the process.
None are applicable.
Specify any other changes made to the process since the
PHA that are not listed above.
last
                                                                       Ch. 2 Pg. 49

-------
7.5. Date of most recent review or revision of operating procedures  The operating
procedures requirements for Program 3 processes can be found at 40 CFR §68.69. For your first
RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the requirement of §68.69(a) (develop and
implement written procedures) for the process or the date you last reviewed or revised the
operating procedures, whichever is later.  (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date
you enter may depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under other
federal or  state laws.) For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most recent review or revision
of the operating procedures. Operating procedures may be reviewed or revised as a result of,
among other things, a change to the process (see §§68.69(c) and 68.75(e)), annual certification of
the operating procedures (see 68.69(c)), or a periodic audit of the prevention program (see
§68.79(a)).

7.6. Training.  The training requirements for Program 3 processes can be found at 40 CFR
§68.71.
       7.6.a. Date of most recent review or revision of training programs.  For your first
       RMP submission, enter the date you ensured that the training you provide the employees
       operating the process meets the requirements of §68.71(a), or the date you last reviewed
       or revised your training programs, whichever is later.  (As explained in the introduction
       to Section 7, the date you enter may depend on whether you are subject to the same or
       similar requirement under other federal or state laws.) For subsequent RMPs, enter the
       date of the most recent review or revision of the training you provide. Training programs
       may be reviewed or revised as  a result of, among other things, a change to the process
       (see § 68.75(c)) or a periodic audit of the prevention program (see §68.79(a)).  If the
       training was not reviewed or revised since the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the
       date provided in the previous RMP.

       7.6.b. Type of training provided (select at least one).
            1. Classroom
            2. On the job
            3. Other (specify)

       7.6.c. Type of competency testing used (select at least one). Identify how employees
       were tested to determine and evaluate comprehension of the training materials.
            1. Written test
            2. Oral test
            3. Demonstration
            4. Observation
            5. Other (specify)

7.7. Maintenance. The maintenance requirements for Program 3 processes can be found at 40
CFR §68.73.  Enter the following:

       7.7.a. The date that you most recently reviewed or revised the maintenance
       procedures. For your first RMP submission, enter the date  you complied with the

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 50

-------
       requirements of §68.73(b) (establish and implement written maintenance procedures) for
       the process, or the date you last reviewed or revised the maintenance procedures,
       whichever is later. (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date you enter may
       depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under other federal
       or state laws.)  For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most recent review or
       revision of the maintenance procedures. Maintenance procedures may be reviewed or
       revised as a result of, among other things, a change to the process (see § 68.75(c)) or a
       periodic audit of the prevention program (see §68.79(a)). If the procedures were not
       reviewed or revised since the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in
       the previous RMP.

       7.7.b. The date of the most recent equipment inspection or test

       7.7.c. The equipment that was inspected or tested (list equipment).

7.8. Management of change. The management of change requirements for Program 3 processes
can be found at 40 CFR §68.75.  Enter the following:

       7.8.a. The date of the most recent change (if any) that triggered the management of
       change procedure.

       7.8.b. The date that you most recently reviewed or revised the management of
       change procedures at your site. For your first RMP submission, enter the date you
       complied with the requirements of 68.75(a) (establish and implement written procedures)
       for the process, or the date you last reviewed or revised the management of change
       procedures, whichever is later.  (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date
       you enter may depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement
       under other federal or state laws.) For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most
       recent review or revision of the procedures. Management of change procedures may be
       reviewed or revised as a  result of, among other things, a periodic audit of the prevention
       program (see §68.79(a)). If the procedures were not reviewed or revised since the
       previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in the previous RMP.

7.9. Date of most recent pre-startup review.  The pre-startup review requirements for Program
3 processes can be found at 40 CFR §68.77. Enter the date of the most recent pre-startup review
(if any) for this process.

7.10. Compliance audits. The compliance audit requirements for Program 3 processes can be
found at 40 CFR §68.79. If you did not conduct a compliance audit prior to submitting your first
RMP (you are not required to do so), leave these fields blank.

       7.10.a. Date of most recent compliance  audit
       7.10.b. Expected or actual date of completion of all changes resulting from the
       compliance audit. This may be left blank if there were no changes.

                                                                             Ch. 2Pg. 51

-------
7.11. Incident investigation. The incident investigation requirements for Program 3 processes
can be found at 40 CFR §68.81. Enter the following:
       7.11.a. Date of your most recent incident investigation (if any).  If you have not had
       an incident investigation, leave this field blank.
       7.11.b. The expected or actual date of completion of all changes resulting from the
       incident investigation.  This may be blank if there were no changes.

7.12.  Date of most recent review or revision of employee participation plans. The employee
participation requirements for Program 3 processes can be found at 40 CFR §68.83.  For your
first RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the requirements of §68.83(a) (develop a
written plan) for the process,  or the date you last reviewed or revised the employee participation
plans, whichever is later. (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date you enter may
depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under other federal  or state
laws.) For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most recent review or revision of the plan.
Employee participation plans may be reviewed or revised as a result of,  among other things, a
periodic audit of the prevention program (see §68.79(a)). If the plan was not reviewed or  revised
since the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in the  previous RMP.

7.13.  Date of most recent review or revision of hot work permit procedures.  The hot work
permit requirements for Program 3 processes can be found at 40 CFR §68.85. For your first
RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the requirement of §68.85 for the process or
the date you last reviewed or  revised the hot work permit procedures, whichever is later.  (As
explained in the introduction  to Section 7, the date you enter may depend on whether you  are
subject to the same or similar requirement under other federal or state laws.) For subsequent
RMPs, enter the date  of the most recent review or revision of your hot work permit procedures.
Hot work permit procedures may be reviewed or revised as a result of, among other  things, a
periodic audit of the prevention program (see §68.79(a)). If the procedures were not reviewed or
revised since the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in the previous RMP.

7.14.  Date of most recent review or revision of contractor safety procedures. The contractor
safety requirements for Program 3 processes can be found at 40 CFR  §68.87.  Leave this field
blank if you do not have any contractors.  Otherwise, for your first RMP submission, enter the
date you complied with the requirements of §68.87(b)(4) (develop and implement safe work
practices for contractors) for the process, or the date you last reviewed or revised the contractor
safety procedures, whichever is later. (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date
you enter may depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under other
federal or state laws.) For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most recent review or revision
of the procedures. Contractor safety procedures may be reviewed or revised as a result of,
among other things, a change to the  process (see §68.75(c)) or a periodic audit of the prevention
program (see §68.79(a)). If the procedures were not reviewed or revised since the previous RMP
was submitted, reenter the date provided in the previous RMP.

7.15.  Date of most recent evaluation of contractor  safety performance. Leave this field
blank if you do not have any contractors or have not yet evaluated contractor performance.

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 52

-------
Otherwise, enter the date of your most recent evaluation of contractor safety performance.  If you
have more than one contractor involved in operating or maintaining the process, enter the date
you completed your evaluations of all the contractors.
                                                                                Ch. 2 Pg. 53

-------
Section 8:     Prevention Program for Program 2 Processes

Complete this section for each prevention program you report for a Program 2 process.

Prevention program description.  If different safeguards apply to different units in your
process, use this field to explain how the prevention program for the process relates to the
different units in the process. For example, "This process includes three interconnected
production units, A, B, and C. Everything in this prevention program applies to all three units,
with the following exceptions:
- The dates of the  hazard review, which are 01/02/97, 6/5/96 and 4/3/96 for units A, B and C,
respectively.
- Production unit A uses only a scrubber as a process control, while units B and C have relief
valves and scrubbers.
- The water curtain indicated as a mitigation measure applies only to production unit C."

If you have so many "exceptions" that it gets too complicated to explain as above, but you still
have many common data elements, you can report your prevention program on a unit-by-unit
basis. To simplify such reporting, you can use the autocopy feature in RMP*Submit so that you
only have to enter the common data elements once.  First, enter the common elements into
RMP* Submit (or the paper form, if you are submitting in paper), then hit the COPY function at
the bottom of the screen to copy that information to another prevention program "record" (if you
are submitting in paper, photocopy the pages). To complete the prevention program record for
each unit, enter the remaining data which is unique to each.

8.1. NAICS code for the process. Enter the NAICS code that most closely corresponds to the
process; it will not necessarily be the same NAICS code for your facility as a whole. The
NAICS code that you choose must be one that you've already entered in the Registration Section
for the covered process.  If you have two processes with the same NAICS code, explain in the
above description field which of the two processes this prevention program relates to.
RMP* Submit will produce a list of the NAICS codes that you have already entered for your
registered processes as a pick list for this  data element. As described in the Registration section
of this manual, the NAICS code system classifies businesses by type using descriptive categories
that correspond to five-digit or six-digit codes.

8.2. Chemical name(s). For each prevention program, provide the names of all regulated
substances held above the threshold in the covered units.  If you have an NFPA-4 flammable
mixture containing regulated flammables, you may list it as a "flammable mixture" and list all of
the regulated substances contained in the mixture.

8.3. Safety information.  The safety information requirements for Program 2 processes can be
found at 40 CFR §68.48. Enter the following:

8.3.a. The date that you most recently reviewed or revised the safety information.  For your
first RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the safety information requirements of

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 54

-------
§68.48(a) (compile safety information) for the process, or the date you last reviewed or revised
the safety information, whichever is later.  (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the
date you enter may depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under
other federal or state laws.)  For subsequent RMPs, enter the date the information was most
recently reviewed or revised. Safety information may be reviewed or revised as a result of,
among other things, a major change to the process (see §68.48(c)) or a periodic audit of the
prevention program (see §68.58(a)). If the safety information was not reviewed or revised since
the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in the previous RMP.

8.3.b. Federal or state regulations or industry-specific design codes and standards used to
demonstrate compliance with the safety information requirement (select at least one). Are
you subject to any of the following Federal or state regulations? Do you use any of the
following industry-specific design codes and standards to demonstrate compliance with the
safety information requirement? If none are applicable, check "none."

       8.3.b.l. NFPA 58 (or state law based on NFPA  58). - NFPA stands for National Fire
       Protection Association; NFPA 58 is a propane (LP gas) handling code. Note that state
       propane laws are generally based on NFPA 58. Select "NFPA 58" if your process is
       subject to a state or local law based on NFPA 58 or if you follow NFPA 58 in any event.

       8.3.b.2. OSHA (29 CFR 1910.111) - OSHA's rule for operations handling anhydrous
       ammonia.  Select "29 CFR 1910.111" if your process is subject to this rule.

       8.3.b.3. ASTM Standards - Select this if you follow American Society of Testing
       Materials standards. ASTM establishes standards for materials, products, systems, test
       methods, specifications, classifications, definitions, and recommended practices.

       8.3.b.4. ANSI Standards - Select this if you follow American National Standards
       Institute standards. ANSI nationally coordinates voluntary standards. ANSI standards
       cover areas as definitions, terminology, symbols,  and abbreviations; materials,
       performance characteristics, procedure, and methods of rating; methods of testing and
       analysis; size, weight, and volume, safety, health, and building construction.

       8.3.b.5. ASME Standards - Select this if you follow American Society of Mechanical
       Engineers standards. ASME conducts research and develops boiler,  pressure vessel, and
       power test codes. It also develops safety codes and standards for equipment.

       8.3.b.6. None - If your facility does not apply to the Program 2 process any national
       standards such as those noted above, and is not subject to any federal or state rules or
       laws such as those noted above, select "none."

       8.3.b.7. Other (specify) - If you apply any other  standards to your process safety
       equipment,  select "other" and specify the standards you apply.  Some examples of other
       standards include the National Electrical Manufacturers Association  (NEMA) standards

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 55

-------
       and the American Petroleum Institute (API) standards. There may also be other codes
       that apply.

       8.3.b.8. Comments - In this section, please explain how federal, state or local
       regulations or industry-specific design codes and standards are being used to demonstrate
       compliance with the safety information requirement.

8.4. Hazard Review. The hazard review requirements for Program 2 processes can be found at
40 CFR §68.50. Enter the following:

       8.4.a. The date of completion of the most recent hazard review or update (must be
       within the five years prior to submission of the RMP).

       8.4.b. The expected or actual date of completion of all changes resulting from the
       hazard review. This may be blank if there were no changes.

       8.4.c. Major hazards identified (select at least one). All major hazards  that were
       identified for the Program 2 process or part of the process at your facility  as a result of
       the hazard review. Major hazards are described in 7.4.d.

       8.4.d. Process controls in use (select at least one).  All of the process controls used on
       the Program 2 process or part of the process. Process controls are equipment and
       procedures used to prevent or limit releases.  Process controls are described in 7.4.e. If
       none are applicable,  check  "none."

       8.4.e. Mitigation systems in use (select at least one). All of the mitigation systems you
       have in place to control a release should one occur from the Program 2 process or part of
       the process. Mitigation systems are described in 7.4.f. If none are applicable, check
       "none."

       8.4.f. Monitoring/detection systems in use (select at least one). All of the monitoring
       and detection systems installed to detect a release of a regulated substance from the
       Program 2 process or part of the process. Monitoring and detection  systems are
       described in 7.4.g. If none are applicable, check "none."

       8.4.g. Changes  since last hazard review or hazard review update  (select at least
       one). All of the changes made to the process or part of the Program 2 process since the
       last hazard review.  Hazard review changes are described in 7.4.h. If none are applicable,
       check "none."

8.5. Date of most recent review or revision of operating procedures  The operating
procedures requirements for Program 2 processes can be found in the RMP  regulation at 40 CFR
§68.52. For your first RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the requirements of
§68.52(a) (prepare written procedures) for the process, or the date you last reviewed or revised

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 56

-------
the operating procedures, whichever is later. (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the
date you enter may depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under
other federal or state laws.)  For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most recent review or
revision of the operating procedures. Operating procedures may be reviewed or revised as a
result of, among other things, a major change to the process (see §68.52(c)) or a periodic audit of
the prevention program (see §68.58(a)).   (See Chapter 7 of the General Guidance for Risk
Management Programs for a discussion of what constitutes a major change.) If the operating
procedures were not reviewed or revised since the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date
provided in the previous RMP.

8.6. Training. Training requirements for Program 2 processes can be found at 40 CFR §68.54.
Enter the following:

       8.6.a. Date of most recent review or revision of training programs. For your first
       RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the requirements of §68.54(a)
       (training) for the process, or the date you last reviewed or revised the training programs,
       whichever is later. (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date you enter may
       depend on whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under other federal
       or state laws.)  For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most recent review or
       revision of the training you provide. Training programs may be reviewed or revised as a
       result of, among other things, a major change to the process (see § 68.54(d)) or a periodic
       audit of the prevention program (see §68.58(a)).  If the training was not reviewed or
       revised since the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in the previous
       RMP.

       8.6.b. Type of training provided (select at least one).
            1. Classroom
            2. On the job
            3. Other (specify)

       8.6.c. Type of competency testing used (select at least one). Identify how employees
       were tested to determine and evaluate comprehension  of the training materials.
            1. Written test
            2. Oral test
            3. Demonstration
            4. Observation
            5. Other (specify)

8.7. Maintenance.  The maintenance requirements for Program 2 processes can be found at 40
CFR §68.56. Enter the following:

       8.7.a. The date that you most recently reviewed or revised  the maintenance
       procedures.  For your first RMP submission, enter the date you complied with the
       requirements of §68.56(a) (prepare and implement maintenance procedures) for the

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 57

-------
       process, or the date you last reviewed or revised the maintenance procedures, whichever
       is later. (As explained in the introduction to Section 7, the date you enter may depend on
       whether you are subject to the same or similar requirement under other federal or state
       laws.) For subsequent RMPs, enter the date of the most recent review or revision of the
       maintenance procedures.  Maintenance procedures may be reviewed or revised as a result
       of, among other things, a major change to the process (see §68.56(a)) or a periodic audit
       of the prevention program (see §68.58(a)).  If the procedures were not reviewed or
       revised since the previous RMP was submitted, reenter the date provided in the previous
       RMP.

       8.7.b. The date of the most recent equipment inspection or test

       8.7.c. The equipment that were inspected or tested (list equipment).

8.8. Compliance Audits.  The compliance audit requirements for Program 2 processes can be 40
CFR §68.58. If you did conduct a compliance audit prior to submitting your first RMP (you are
not required to do so), leave these fields blank.

       8.8.a. The date of your most recent compliance audit

       8.8.b. The expected or actual date of completion of all changes resulting from the
       compliance audit.  This may be blank if there were no changes.

8.9. Incident Investigation.  The incident investigation requirements for Program 2 processes
can be found at 40 CFR §68.60. Enter the following:

       8.9.a. The date of your most recent incident investigation (if any). If you have not
       had an incident investigation, leave this field blank.

       8.9.b. The expected or actual date of completion of all changes resulting from the
       incident investigation. This may be blank if there were no changes.

8.10.  Date of most recent change that triggered review or revision  Enter the date of the
most recent change that triggered a review or a revision of safety information, the hazard review,
operating or maintenance procedures, or training.
                                                                             Ch. 2 Pg. 58

-------
Section 9:    Emergency Response Program

Complete this section once for all covered processes.

The extent to which you need to fill out this portion of the RMP depends on whether your
employees will respond to releases of regulated substances at your facility. Under §68.90(b), if
your employees will not respond to releases, you are not required to comply with the
requirements for an emergency response program provided you meet the following criteria: (1) if
you hold one or more regulated toxic substances over threshold quantities, your facility must be
included in the community emergency response plan developed under the Emergency Planning
and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA); (2) if you hold only one or more regulated
flammable substances over threshold quantities, you must have coordinated response actions
with the local fire department; and (3) you must have appropriate mechanisms in place to notify
emergency responders when there is a need for a response.

If your employees will respond to releases of regulated substances at your facility, you are
subject to §68.95 and must fill out all the data items in this section of the RMP. If your
employees will  not respond to releases of regulated substances at your facility, you need only
respond to the first two (9.1 .a & 9.1 .b) and last three (9.7.a, 9.7.b, & 9.8) emergency response
data elements.

9.1.   Written emergency response (ER) plan

9.1.a. Is your facility included in the community emergency response plan? If your facility
is subject to part 68 because it has one or more regulated toxic substances above threshold
quantities, it is probably included in a local emergency response plan under the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). Under §303  of EPCRA, local
emergency planning committees  (LEPCs) must prepare an emergency  response plan for facilities
in their planning district having toxic substances listed under EPCRA  §302 in excess of the
threshold planning quantity established under that section.  Most of the toxic substances listed in
part 68 are also listed under EPCRA §302, and the EPCRA thresholds for those substances are
generally the same or lower than the part 68 thresholds for the same substances. Consequently,
part 68 facilities with toxic substances listed under both EPCRA and part 68 should be included
in community emergency response plans.

In addition, facilities subject to part 68 as a result of flammable substances may also be covered
by community  emergency response plans, since LEPCs can, and sometimes do, include other
hazardous substances, including flammables, in their plans. If you are not sure whether your
facility is included in your community's local emergency plan, check with your LEPC.

As noted above, if your employees are not going to respond to releases of regulated substances at
your facility and you have one or more part 68 regulated toxic substances over  threshold
quantities, your facility must be included in the local emergency response place under EPCRA.
                                                                             Ch. 2 Pg. 59

-------
Check this question if your facility is included in the community's emergency response plan.

9.1.b. Does your facility have its own written emergency response plan?  Check this question
if you have a response plan (not just an emergency action plan as required by OSHA under 29
CFR 1910.38).

9.2. Does your facility's ER plan include specific actions to be taken in response to
accidental releases of regulated substance(s)?

9.3. Does your facility's ER plan include procedures for informing the public and local
agencies responding to accidental releases?

9.4. Does your facility's ER plan include information on emergency health care?
These data elements (9.2, 9.3, 9.4) reflect the three mandatory components of the emergency
response plan required under §68.95(a)(l). For an emergency response plan to be in compliance
with this requirement, you must be able to answer "yes" to each of these questions.

9.5. Date of most recent review or update of your facility's ER plan.
Indicate the date on which you most recently reviewed or updated your plan. Section
68.95(a)(4) requires that ER plans be reviewed and updated "as appropriate" to reflect changes at
the facility and to ensure that employees are informed of changes.

9.6. Date of the most recent ER training for your facility's employees.
Indicate the date of the most recent emergency response training at your facility.  Emergency
response training includes drills involving your personnel with or without outside emergency
response agencies and tabletop exercises of your emergency response plan. Single purpose drills
(e.g., alarm system drills) may be listed, but exercises that test more aspects of the plan are
preferable.

Part 68 does not specify a schedule for conducting employee response training. You should
note, however, that other planning requirements (e.g., HAZWOPER) may establish a more
formal schedule for conducting training (e.g., eight hours of annual refresher training).

9.7.a-b. Local agency with which your facility's ER plan or response actions are
coordinated.  If you have an ER plan, indicate the name and phone number of the agency with
whom you have coordinated your plan.  Section 68.95(c) requires that a facility's ER plan be
coordinated with the community emergency response plan under EPCRA for the facility's
community.  The LEPC for the facility's community will typically be the agency  with which ER
plans are coordinated.

If you do not have an ER plan, indicate the agency with which you have coordinated response
activities. As noted above, §68.90(b) provides that if you have regulated toxic substances and
your employees will not be responding to releases of those substances,  your facility must be
included in the community  emergency response plan developed by the LEPC for your

                                                                              Ch. 2 Pg. 60

-------
community.  If that is the case for your facility, indicate the name and phone number of your
LEPC here.  If you have only regulated flammable substances and your employees will not be
responding to releases of those substances, you must have coordinated response actions with the
local fire department. If that is case for your facility, indicate the name and phone number of
your local  fire department here.

9.8. What other Federal or State emergency plan requirements is the facility subject to?
Indicate all of the federal and state emergency response regulations or statutes to which your
facility is subject.  Select at least one.  All RMP facilities are subject to OSHA emergency
planning requirements at either 29 CFR 1910.38 or 29 CFR 1910.120.

       a. OSHA Regulations at 29 CFR 1910.38. These are OSHA's Emergency Action Plan
       regulations. All RMP facilities are subject to either these OSHA regulations or OSHA
       regulations at 29 CFR 1910.120.

       b. OSHA Regulations at 29 CFR 1910.120. These are OSHA's Hazardous Waste
       Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Plan regulations. All RMP
       facilities are subject to either these OSHA regulations or OSHA regulations at 29 CFR
       1910.38.

       c. Clean Water Act Regulations at 40 CFR 112. These are EPA's Oil Spill Prevention
       Control and Countermeasures (SPCC)  regulations under the Clean Water Act.

       d. RCRA Regulations at 40 CFR 264, 265, and 279.52. These are EPA's permitting
       regulations for solid waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

       e. OPA 90  Regulations at 40 CFR 112, 33 CFR 154, 49 CFR 194, or 30 CFR 254.
       These are EPA, U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Transportation, and Department of the
       Interior facility response plan regulations under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90).

       f. State EPCRA Rules or Laws. These are state emergency planning and community
       right-to-know (EPCRA) laws.  Federal EPCRA does not require facility response plans,
       but some state laws may.

       g. Other. Specify any other emergency response regulations or laws to which your
       facility is subject.
                                                                            Ch. 2 Pg. 61

-------
Executive Summary

The executive summary must include a brief description of your facility's risk management
program. You determine the length; it may be as short as two or three pages or, if you have
many processes, it may need to be more lengthy. You should view the Executive Summary as an
opportunity to communicate in your own words the nature of the risks posed by your facility to
your community and to explain what you have done to minimize those risks. The summary can
be an excellent vehicle to display the effort and resources your facility has put into its accident
prevention program.

Your executive summary can not be claimed as CBI.  Do not include any CBI data in your
executive summary.

If your executive summary is short, it can be "cut" from the word processing program you are
using and "pasted" into the text box on the Executive  Summary screen.  Alternatively,  you may
type the executive summary straight into the text box. To expand the visual size of the text box,
press [shift-F2].
To report long executive summaries, you have 2 options:
       1) Attach your entire executive summary in a separate ASCII file:  While you are
       using your word processing program, save the executive summary as an ASCII Text file
       (most word processing program allow you to do this). Then, in RMP*Submit's
       Executive Summary screen, click on the box with the 3 dots (...) at the bottom of the
       screen to "browse" your system and locate the ASCII Text file. Select the ASCII Text
       file containing your executive summary, and RMP*Submit will store that filename.
       When you are ready to submit your RMP, choose "Create Submission File" from the
       "List of Risk Management Plans" screen, and the executive summary file will be
       automatically stored on the submittal disk along with the  rest of the RMP.

       2) Cut and paste part of the executive summary and attach the rest: Enter part of
       your executive summary into the text box on the Executive Summary page in
       RMP*Submit by either cutting and pasting text or typing  it in. Then, attach the rest of
       the executive summary in a separate ASCII Text file using the instructions in #1 above.
IMPORTANT - A summary of the off-site consequence analysis (OCA) for the worst-case
and alternative release scenario(s) is no longer required to be included in the executive
summary.  While the RMP rule originally required that the executive summary briefly describe
the OCA for worst-case and alternative release scenario(s), EPA amended the RMP rule in 2004
to remove this requirement because of security concerns.
                                                                             Ch. 2 Pg. 62

-------
The Executive Summary must briefly describe the following elements:

The accidental release prevention and emergency response policies at your facility
Describe your facility's overall approach to chemical safety. You may want to include any
corporate policies (if applicable) and an overview of senior management commitment to safety
and implementation of safe procedures.

Your facility and the regulated substances handled
Provide a description of your facility so that the public has a clear picture of the facility, its
processes, and products. Describe the primary activities at the facility (e.g., manufacturer of
polyethylene, pulp mill, etc.) and the regulated substances used. In addition, you may want to
mention the quantities of these substances handled  or stored at your facility.

The general accidental release prevention program and chemical-specific prevention steps
You may wish to mention the rules and regulations with which your facility complies, such as
the OSHA PSM rule. You  should also highlight practices that you believe are important to your
prevention program. The steps you list may be either technological (e.g., backup systems) or
procedural/managerial (e.g., improved maintenance or training).

The five-year accident history
Do not present accident history information in table form here;  more details will be provided in
the data elements. This should be a written summary; for example, "We have had five accidental
releases of chlorine in the past five years; the largest release was 1,500 pounds. No one offsite
was injured, but several houses were evacuated as a precautionary measure during the October
1995 and May 1996 releases."

The emergency response program
Briefly describe the elements of your response program such as coordination with local
emergency responders, training received by personnel, drills conducted by your facility, public
notification and alert systems, as appropriate.

Planned changes to improve safety
List any upcoming events such as training, installation of new mitigation or control equipment or
technology, organizational changes, etc., that will improve safety at your facility.
                                                                               Ch. 2 Pg. 63

-------
CHAPTER 3      How TO ASSEMBLE AND SUBMIT YOUR RMP

A complete RMP submission package includes at least two items:

             1. The RMP  in ASCII format, created by using either RMP* Submit or a
             commercial RMP software product, on a diskette or CD.  If you do not have the
             capability to  submit electronically, see the section on "Paper Submission" below.
             Include only  1 RMP on each diskette/CD or form.

             2. A certification statement for the entire RMP, signed (with an original signature)
             and dated.

       Submit only one RMP and accompanying certification statement per envelope to ensure
       that the certification  statement is applied to the appropriate RMP. If you are claiming
       CBI, additional  items are required ; see Chapter 4: Submitting CBI & Trade Secrets of
       this manual for more information.  Do not send other correspondence with your RMP.

Completeness Check

       One advantage of submitting electronically (using RMP*Submit or a commercial RMP
       software package) is that you will be able to check whether your RMP is "complete" in
       the sense that you have provided information for the RMP data elements that every
       facility must complete.

       Using RMP* Submit, you can run the Check function (from the List of Risk Management
       Plans screen) to verify the "completeness" of your RMP at any time.  Once you have
       completed entering your RMP data, you should execute the Check function to check for
       errors. The Check function is a button on the List of Risk Management Plans  screen
       (See Exhibit 3). The Check function is also executed automatically each time you
       execute the Create Submission File function.

       The CHECK function will  create an Error Report if your RMP is "incomplete." It is
       important to note, however, that the "completeness" check provided by RMP*Submit is
       not a compliance check.  It will not indicate whether your RMP meets all applicable part
       68 requirements; it will only indicate that you have  provided the right type of information
       for those data elements that every facility submitting an RMP must at a minimum
       complete. RMP* Submit cannot discern if you have provided correct information or if
       you should have completed data elements in addition to those required of every facility.
       Consequently, you should not rely on RMP*Submit's "completeness" check to determine
       whether your RMP fully complies with the requirements of part 68.

       If you used a commercial RMP software program, you can still use RMP* Submit to
       verify the "completeness" of your RMP.  RMP* Submit can import an RMP ASCII file.
       Once  a new ASCII file is imported, run the CHECK function to verify "completeness."

                                                                            Ch. 3  Pg. 1

-------
       RMP* Submit will produce an Error Report if it detects that the RMP is not "complete" or
       if it detects any of the following errors:

       1) You have omitted critical and mandatory data elements such as:
       —Facility name and address;
       —For each process (section 1): program level, chemical name, CAS # and NAICS code;
       —For each OCA section (sections 2-5): chemical name;
       —For each Accident History (section 6):  chemical name, CAS #, & date;
       —For each Prevention Program (sections 7-8): NAICS, chemical name, CAS #.

       2) You have entered data elements which do not meet specific "validation" criteria.
       All data elements required for an RMP to be "complete" must contain a response that is
       appropriate for the kind of information requested or RMP* Submit will generate an Error
       Report. For example, all date fields must contain a 2-digit month between 01 and 12, a
       2-digit day between 01  and 31, and a 4-digit year (MM/DD/YYYY). RMP*Submit will
       not indicate whether the date or other information provided is correct or meets regulatory
       requirements.

       3) You have entered data elements which are inconsistent across sections of the
       RMP. For example, for every toxic chemical reported in the registration section for
       Program 2 and 3 processes, there must be a toxic alternative release scenario reported.

Errors in #1 above make your RMP submission unprocessable and RMP*Submit cannot generate
an ASCII file.  Errors generated in #2 & #3 above will still generate the ASCII file for
submission.  Therefore, you can choose to submit an RMP that is "incomplete," meaning it
contains errors.  However, if you submit an "incomplete" RMP, you will not be in compliance
with the part 68 requirement to submit a RMP meeting all applicable regulatory requirements by
the applicable due date.

Creating the RMP Submission File on Diskette

When you are ready to submit your RMP, run the Create Submission File function (from the
RMP List screen) to create  an ASCII file for submission. RMP*Submit will once again run the
validation program to check for "completeness."

Graphics Files

In Sections 2 through 5, you may have included a graphics file name. If so, remember that you
must take the extra step of copying the file to the diskette or CD that contains your RMP
submission ASCII file, or an additional diskette or CD that contains just your graphics file.
Make sure the file name in the  scenario and the actual name of the file match exactly. Make sure
they are identified in the RMP  with a specific worst case or alternative release scenario.
                                                                              Ch. 3 Pg. 2

-------
How to Label Your Submission Diskette

You must attach a label to each diskette (not the diskette's jacket). The label must be typed or
legibly handwritten. A sample label with the necessary information is shown below.  While the
types of packaging and shipping to use for submitting diskettes are left to your discretion, be
sure to package them in a way to avoid damage.  Damaged diskettes or CDs are unprocessable.
RMP
Facility
Name
Date: 6/1/1999
Contact

DiskJ_of J_
RMP Contact Name &
Phone Number
Certification Letter
       A certification letter is required for all RMP submissions.
       68.185  Certification.
              (a) For Program 1 processes, the owner or operator shall submit in the RMP
              the certification statement provided in § 68.12(b)(4) of this part.

              (b) For all other covered processes, the owner or operator shall submit in the
              RMP a single certification that, to the best of the signer's knowledge,
              information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the information
              submitted is true, accurate, and complete.
       The certification statement submitted must bear the original signature of the person
       making the certification. Photocopied, faxed or otherwise duplicated signatures are not
       originals. Be sure to include the signed copy with your RMP submission.

       The certification statement must be signed by the person at the facility responsible for the
       Risk Management Program (the owner or operator or a senior official with management
       responsibility for the person (or persons) completing the RMP).  The owner, operator, or
       official must certify the accuracy and completeness of the RMP by signing and dating the
       certification statement.  The statement applies to all the information supplied in the RMP
       and should be signed only after the form is complete. The name and title of the person
       signing the statement should be printed or typed on the certification.
                                                                                Ch. 3 Pg. 3

-------
       Sample certification letters are provided in Appendix C. In addition, RMP* Submit
       contains the text of the sample letters under the "Main Menu," -> "Tools," -> "Edit
       Certification Letters."  You can cut and paste this text into your own word processing
       package to finalize and print the letter

Unprocessable and Incomplete RMPs

The Reporting Center will process all RMPs using the same Check function found in
RMP*Submit. If any of the fields needed for ASCII file generation are missing (error in #1
above), the Center will be unable to process your RMP and you will be so notified. If any other
errors (like those in #2 & #3 above) are detected, an Error Report will be generated and the RMP
will be marked as "incomplete."  Both "complete" and "incomplete" RMPs will be included in
the RMP database.  Error reports for those that are incomplete, as well as a list of RMPs that
cannot be processed, will also be included.  The RMP database is temporarily unavailable on the
Internet, but information from it is available to the public on request.  A copy of any Error
Report generated for your RMP will be mailed to you with your notification letter.

In addition to missing required fields (an error in #1 above), an RMP submitted on diskette will
be unable to be processed for the following reasons:

              —There is a virus on the diskette you submitted that could not be removed at our
             Reporting Center.

              —The submitted diskette, or the ASCII file on the diskette you submitted, is
             unreadable (for example, damaged diskette).

              —More than one Risk Management Plan was reported in a single submission.

In addition to inconsistencies in data elements (an error in #2  or #3  above), an RMP will be
considered incomplete if you do not include a certification letter with your submission or the
signature on the certification letter is not an original.

       Attention: If you  consider any of the information you are required to report to be
       confidential business information (CBI), please read the following:

             Before you submit your RMP, review the regulatory provisions (40 CFR §2.208)
             governing CBI claims and decide if the information you consider confidential
             meets the applicable criteria for CBI.  See Chapter 4 for instructions on how to
              claim CBI.

             DO NOT include the information you believe meets the criteria for CBI in
             your RMP (regardless of whether you use RMP* Submit or the paper RMP form).
             Because the Clean Air Act requires that RMPs be  available to the public, any
             information you include in your RMP CANNOT be  claimed CBI in the future.
                                                                               Ch. 3 Pg. 4

-------
Paper Submissions - Forms and Instructions
      If you are unable to submit your RMP on diskette, use the paper form provided in
      Appendix A.  Our Reporting Center can only process paper RMPs submitted using that
      form. If you submit on paper, you are asked to complete the Paper Submission Form
      (Appendix B) and send it with your RMP.

      Attention: If you consider any of the information you are required to report to be
      confidential business information (CBI), please read the following:

             Before you submit your RMP, review the regulatory provisions (40 CFR §2.208)
             governing CBI claims and decide if the information you consider confidential
             meets the applicable criteria for CBI.

             DO NOT include the information you believe meets the criteria for CBI in
             your RMP (regardless of whether you use RMP* Submit or the paper RMP form).
              Because the Clean Air Act requires RMPs to be available to the public,  any
             information you include in your RMP CANNOT be claimed CBI in the future.

             At the same time you submit your RMP, you must submit ON SEPARATE
             PAPER FORMS the information that you  are claiming CBI and your
             substantiation that the information meets the criteria for CBI.

             Refer to Chapter 4 of the User's Manual for complete instructions on how to
             submit CBI.

Where to send completed RMP Reports

      Send reports by regular mail to:
             Risk Management Plan (RMP) Reporting Center
             P.O. Box 1515
             Lanham-Seabrook, Maryland 20703-1515
             (301)4295018

      Send certified mail, overnight mail, and hand-delivered submissions only to:
             Risk Management Plan (RMP) Reporting Center
             c/o CSC
             Suite 300
             8400 Corporate Drive
             New Carrollton, MD 20785
             (301)4295018

Record Keeping
      You are required to maintain records that support what is reported in your RMP and your
      implementation of the Risk Management Program for five years (40 CFR §68.200).

                                                                            Ch. 3 Pg. 5

-------
Ch. 4 Pg. 1

-------
CHAPTER 4      SUBMITTING CBI AND TRADE SECRETS

On January 6,  1999, EPA published a final rule in the Federal Register specifying which RMP
data elements may not be claimed as confidential business information (CBI) or trade secret and
what procedures must be followed to claim information as CBI. The regulatory provisions, at
sections 68.151 and 68.152, provide that if you claim any RMP information as CBI, you must
submit to EPA a sanitized RMP (either on diskette or paper), a Substantiation Form (for
explaining why you believe the information meets the criteria for CBI), and an Unsanitized Data
Elements Form (on paper only) (see Appendices D & E for forms). The sanitized, or redacted,
RMP should  not include any CBI. Any CBI included in a sanitized RMP (either in diskette or
paper form) will be automatically loaded into RMP*Info and will be available to the public.
Report any information claimed as CBI only on the Unsanitized Data Elements Form.  The
Unsanitized Data Elements Form is only for those data elements that you are claiming as CBI,
not for the entire RMP.

For a data element that requires you to report information that you believe meets the applicable
criteria for CBI, you may claim the information as CBI in one of the following ways:

      If you  are submitting on diskette - Check the CBI box at the top of the screen where
      that data element appears and leave the field blank.

      If you  are submitting on the RMP Paper Form - Write "CBI" in the space provided for
      that data element on the sanitized RMP.

However, if you are claiming chemical name as CBI, you must report  one of the following
generic chemical categories. These will appear in the chemical pick lists in RMP*Submit once
you check the  CBI box at the top of the screen.
          CBI Acids
          CBI Amines, Ammonia, and Hydrazines
          CBI Arsenic and Phosphorus Compounds
          CBI Boron Compounds
          CBI Carbonyl Compounds
          CBI Cyanides and Nitriles
          CBI Esters, Alcohols, Aldehydes, and Furans
          CBI Halogenated Organic Compounds
          CBI Halogens and Halogen Oxides
          CBI Isocyanates and Isothiocyanates
          CBI Nitrogen Oxides and Organic Nitro Compounds
          CBI Organic Silanes
          CBI Oxiranes and Azirdines
          CBI Selenium and Sulfer Compounds
          CBI Flammable Substance
                                                                           Ch. 4 Pg. 2

-------
In summary, a complete RMP package with a CBI claim must include #1, #2, #4 & #5, and
possibly #3:

       1. A sanitized, complete RMP in which the data elements claimed CBI are left blank
       except for an indication that the information has been claimed as CBI (e.g., for RMPs on
       diskette, the "CBI" box has been checked). This should be submitted on diskette or on
       the paper RMP form.  This version of the RMP will be in RMP*Info, the publicly
       accessible database.

       2. Sanitized CBI Substantiation Form(s) (Appendix D). If your explanation of why
       information is CBI entails providing other information you believe is CBI, you must
       complete two versions of the CBI  Substantiation Form — a sanitized version and an
       unsanitized version.  The sanitized version should omit the information you claim is
       confidential and leave in its place the notation "information claimed confidential." The
       sanitized form should be submitted on paper  only. If you are claiming multiple data
       elements as CBI, you may need multiple substantiation forms. All pages of all forms
       must be  stapled together. Sanitized Substantiation Forms will be  available to the public
       on request.

       3. Unsanitized CBI Substantiation Form(s) (Appendix D). If your substantiation includes
       CBI, you must also include an unsanitized version of a completed CBI Substantiation
       Form that provides the information that you claim is CBI. This should be submitted on
       paper  only. If you are claiming multiple data elements, you will  need multiple
       substantiation forms.  All pages of all forms must be stapled together.

       4. An Unsanitized CBI Data Elements Form (Appendix E) that provides the RMP
       information that you claim is CBI. This should be submitted on paper only. Staple all
       pages together.

       5. Certification Letter - signed and dated.

An RMP submission that claims CBI and  does not contain the proper forms, will be considered
"incomplete."
                                                                               Ch. 4 Pg. 3

-------
CHAPTER 5      WHAT TO EXPECT AFTER You SUBMIT

Once your RMP is processed, you will be notified regarding the submission status of your RMP.
Notification can be expected within several weeks, although delays may occur during peak
submission times. The notification will contain the following information:

(1) Your EPA Facility Identification Number.
       A unique EPA Facility Identification Number (also referred to as the RMP Identification
Number) is assigned to a facility upon its first submission and always stays with a facility, even
when ownership changes. If this is your initial RMP submission, this notification provides you
this number.  Save the number.  You will need it for all subsequent RMP submissions,
corrections, and correspondence specific to that facility.

(2) Complete/Incomplete Status of your submitted RMP.
       Once your RMP is received at the RMP Reporting Center, it will be screened for the kind
       of errors described previously. If any such  errors are found, you will receive an Error
       Report. Please note that this Error Report will also be included with your RMP in
       RMP*Info1. Refer to  Chapter 6: Corrections to your RMP, for instructions on how to
       correct any errors you may have.

(3) The postmark date of your RMP.
       You must update your RMP at least every five years.  As a general rule, the five-year
       anniversary for updating the RMP is calculated based on the postmark date of your last
       RMP submission.  Since you may not know the exact postmark date, we will provide it to
       you for your records. For RMPs filed before the initial due date of June 21,  1999, the
       first five-year anniversary is June 21, 2004.  Note that 40 CRF §68.190(b) requires you
       to update your RMP under several different circumstances, some or all of which could
       occur before the fifth anniversary of your last RMP submission.

(4) If you submitted on paper, we will send you a paper copy of the printout of your RMP.
       Paper  submittals will be entered into RMP*Info manually by data entry staff. You will
       receive a print out of your RMP as it appears in RMP*Info.
       J* RMP*Info, the publicly accessible database of RMPs previously available on the
Internet, is temporarily unavailable.  However, information from RMP*Info is available to the
public on request.
                                                                              Ch. 5 Pg. 1

-------
Chapter 6 Corrections to Your RMP

EPA has established a "correction" procedure for making changes to your RMP that reflect
administrative or other minor changes at your facility that do not require an update of your entire
RMP. This procedure can be used to make corrections you are required to make to your RMP
(e.g., change in emergency contact information) as well as corrections that you may choose to
make (change in facility email address). Submitting a corrected RMP does not change the five-
year anniversary date for updating your entire RMP.

When to Correct Your RMP

You must correct your RMP if the changes specified in §68.195 (see box below) occur.  (Note:
"stationary source" is the term used by the regulations to refer to a facility).
  68.195  Required Corrections

  The owner or operator of a stationary source for which a RMP was submitted shall correct
  the RMP as follows:

         (1) New accident history information - For any accidental release meeting the five-
         year accident history reporting criteria of §68.42 and occurring after [insert
         publication date of rule], the owner or operator shall submit the data required under
         §68.168, §68.170(j), and §68.175(1) with respect to that accident within six months of
         the release or by the time the RMP is updated under §68.190, whichever is earlier.

         (2) Emergency contact information - Beginning June 21, 2004, within one month of
         any change in the emergency contact information required under §68.160  (b)(6), the
         owner or operator, shall submit a correction of that information.
Additionally, if you receive a notification from the RMP Reporting Center that informs you that
your RMP is "incomplete," provide the needed information as soon as possible using the
corrections procedure. You may also discover other errors on your own, may need to make a
change to reflect a change in ownership of the facility, or may need to make minor
administrative changes such as provide a new phone number or contact name. You can correct
your RMP to implement such administrative changes.  You may also correct your RMP to
remove OCA data from your Executive Summary.

How To Correct Your RMP

The process for making corrections or administrative changes to an electronically submitted
RMP requires that you change the original RMP as needed and  submit the corrected  RMP on
diskette or CD with an accompanying paper certification.
                                                                              Ch. 6 Pg. 1

-------
       Note: EPA is developing a new tool that will allow facilities to make certain corrections
       and other small changes to the administrative sections of the RMP on-line, eliminating
       the need to mail diskettes and certification letters for such corrections.  The internet-
       based tool for  correcting the administrative sections of the RMPs on-line (known as
       RMP Web Registration Correction) will be available in May 2004. Further information
       about this tool  will be on EPA's website at www.epa.gov/emergencies.

If you submitted an RMP on paper, make the changes in red ink on the printout of your RMP
submission (which the Reporting Center will mail back to you with your notification letter).
You must also submit  a new certification letter for these corrections. A  sample certification
letter for corrections/updates can be found in Appendix C.
                     Correction for New Accident History Information

   If you have a reportable accident, you must revise section 6 of your RMP to include
   information about the accident within six months of the accident's occurrence. If the
   accident involved a Program 2 or 3 process, you must also revise the incident investigation
   information for that process in the RMPs, reported as part of Prevention Program
   Information, section 7 or 8 of the RMP. Specifically, in section 7 or 8, you must revise: (1)
   the date of investigation (40 CFR 68.170(j)); and (2) the expected date of completion of any
   changes due to that accident investigation (40 CFR 68.175(1)).

   The criteria for determining which accidents must be included in the five-year accident
   history are found at 40 CFR 68.42. Guidance on the criteria and the reportable data elements
   for the five-year accident history are found  in the General Risk Management Program
   Guidance, available on our website at:
   (http://yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/content/EPAguidance.htm).
When you are ready to submit your corrected RMP, click on the button "Create Submission
File." RMP* Submit will prompt you for:
       Submission Type:
              O First-time RMP Submission
              O Correction to my current RMP
              o Re-Submission (all 9 sections are updated and certified)

Be sure to check the "correction" box. Also, select your reason for the correction from the pick
list.  The pick list choices are:

       C01    Clerical error corrected
       C02    Additional information supplied
       COS    Minor administrative change
       C04    Notification of facility ownership change

                                                                                Ch. 6 Pg. 2

-------
COS    New accident history information
C06    Change in emergency contact information
C07    New data element required by EPA
COS    Optional data element requested by EPA
C09    Removed OCA description from executive summary
                                                                    Ch. 6 Pg. 3

-------
CHAPTER 7
UPDATING AND CERTIFYING ALL 9 SECTIONS OF
YouRRMP: RE-SUBMISSION
In general, you must fully update your RMP no later than 5 years after the postmark date of your
last submission, or sooner if any of the changes specified in §68.190(b) (see box below) occur.
However, the five-year anniversary for facilities that submitted an RMP before the initial due
date of June 21, 1999, is June 21, 2004, not earlier. Note that the regulation uses the term
"stationary source" to refer to a facility.
          68.190  Updates
          (b)  The owner or operator of a stationary source shall revise and update the
          RMP submitted under § 68.150 as follows:
                 (1) Within five years of its initial submission or most recent update
                 required by paragraphs (b)(2)-(b)(7) of this section, whichever is later.
                 (2) No later than three years after a newly regulated substance is first
                 listed by EPA;
                 (3) No later than the date on which a new regulated substance is first
                 present in an already covered process above a threshold quantity;
                 (4) No later than the date on which a regulated substance is first
                 present above a threshold quantity in a new process;
                 (5) Within six months of a change that requires a revised PHA or
                 hazard review;
                 (6) Within six months of a change that requires a revised off site
                 consequence analysis as provided in §68.36; and
                 (7) Within six months of a change that alters the Program level  that
                 applied to any covered process.
To submit a "re-submission," you must update all nine sections of your RMP. If you submitted
electronically, revise your previous RMP as appropriate and submit the updated RMP on
diskette. You must also submit a new certification letter for the updated RMP that covers all the
information in the RMP.  A sample certification letter can be found in Appendix C. Re-
submissions will re-set the 5-year anniversary date by which you must next update your RMP at
the latest.

When you are ready to "Submit" your updated RMP, RMP*Submit will prompt you for:
       Submission Type:
             OFirst-time RMP Submission
             OCorrection to my current RMP
             ORe-submission (all 9 sections are updated and certified)
Be sure to check the "Re-submission" box. Also, select your reason for the re-submission from
                                                                            Ch. 7 Pg. 1

-------
the pick list. The pick list choices are:
             R01    Newly regulated substance listed by EPA (40 CFR 68.190(b)(2))
             R02    Newly regulated substance above TQ in already covered process (40 CFR
                    68.190(b)(3))
             R03    Regulated substance present above TQ in new (or previously not
                    covered) process (40 CFR 68.190(b)(4))
             R04    Revised PHA / Hazard Review due to process change (40 CFR
                    68.190(b)(5))
             R05    Revised OCA  due to change (40 CFR 68.190(b)(6))
             R06    Change in program level of covered process (40 CFR 68.190(b)(7))
             R07    5-year update (40 CFR 68.190(b)(l))
             R08    Process no longer covered (source has other processes that remain
                    covered) (40 CFR 68.190(b)(7))
             R09    Voluntary update (not described by any of the above reasons)
                                                                             Ch. 7 Pg. 2

-------
CHAPTER 8       NOTIFYING EPA THAT YOUR FACILITY is No
                   LONGER COVERED BY RMP:  DE-REGISTRATION

Changes may occur at your facility that make it no longer subject to the RMP regulations at 40
CFR Part 68 (e.g. you replace the regulated substances in your process with unregulated
substances.) If your facility is no longer covered by RMP, you must notify EPA as specified in
§68.190(c) (see box below). Note  that the regulation uses the term "stationary source" to refer to
a facility.
  68.190  Updates
  (c) If a stationary source is no longer subject to this part, the owner or operator shall submit a
  de-registration to EPA within six months indicating that the stationary source is no longer
  covered.
To de-register, you should submit a letter to the RMP Reporting Center within six months and
include the effective date of the de-registration (the date on which you facility was no longer
covered by part 68). The letter should be signed by the owner or operator and include your RMP
ID number (the 12-digit ID number assigned by EPA).

You can use RMP*Submit to generate the letter for you by running the de-register function
(from the Main Menu screen).

If your facility de-registers and later becomes subject to the RMP regulation again, you will need
to submit a new RMP. Submit the new RMP as a re-submission (see Chapter 7 of this manual)
using your previous EPA Facility ID #.

De-registered facilities will be noted as such in RMP*Info. De-registered RMPs will remain in
RMP*Info for 15 years.

Important Reminders

Remember to include the 12-digit EPA Facility Identification number (usually beginning with
1000) that was assigned to your facility. The EPA Facility ID was given to you in the
notification letter you received from the RMP Reporting Center regarding the submission status
of your RMP.
Current Mailing Address for RMP Reporting Center

                                                                           Ch. 8 Pg. 1

-------
Mail the signed letter to:

Risk Management Plan (RMP) Reporting Center
P.O. Box 1515
Lanham-Seabrook, Maryland 20703-1515

For courier and overnight delivery packages, the address is:

Risk Management Plan (RMP) Reporting Center
c/o CSC
Suite 300
8400 Corporate Drive
New Carrollton, MD 20785
                                                                             Ch. 8 Pg. 2

-------
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS & TERMS

CBI         Confidential Business Information
CPU        Central Processing Unit
DLL        Dynamic Link Library
EPA        Environmental Protection Agency
EPCRA      Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
GPF        General Protection Fault
MB         Megabyte(s)
NAICS      North American Industrial Classification System
OCA        Offsite Consequence Analysis
Pick List     A list of items to choose for an answer.
POTWs      Publicly Owner Treatment Works
RAM        Random Access Memory
RMP        Risk Management Plan
VGA        Video Graphics Adapter
                                                                       Ch. 9 Pg. 2

-------