UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON D.C. 20460
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD
May 5, 2009
EPA-SAB-09-013
The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson
Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Subject: Science Advisory Board (SAB) Comments on EPA's Immediate Science Needs
Dear Administrator Jackson:
It was a great honor to meet with you in February and to introduce you to the SAB. As
you know, the SAB is a multi-disciplinary, multi-sector board of experts that provides
independent objective scientific advice to you to assist and inform you in decision-making. We
are pleased to welcome you as the leader of the US Environmental Protection Agency and to
your role as the nation's chief environmental protection official. We thank you for your April
21, 2009 letter responding to the SAB's advisory report on EPA's strategic research vision. We
are pleased it reaffirms your commitment to science as the backbone of the Agency's practice as
well as to scientific integrity and the clear articulation of EPA's policy judgments and actions in
ways that account for knowledge gaps and scientific uncertainties. We look forward to working
with you in the coming years as the nation addresses its most critical environmental issues.
Since 1979, the SAB has provided independent advice to EPA Administrators on a wide
range of scientific and technical topics, especially key EPA scientific assessments, models,
guidelines, and research plans. It has become increasingly apparent that for EPA to respond
successfully to the changing nature of the nation's environmental problems, EPA should improve
its science program, including an emphasis on research that develops the knowledge and
methods to assess and manage environmental problems. The Office of Research and
Development (ORD) "transformation initiative" that you mention in your letter will be a key part
of gaining the knowledge that we now lack on many of the large, and as we are increasingly
learning, connected environmental problems faced by the nation and the world.
The issues identified in the following paragraphs highlight key observations that the SAB
has made during interactions with EPA over many years. At our recent SAB retreat we
highlighted some key issues, identified in the paragraphs below, that we felt you should consider
as early as possible as part of the EPA science program. It is very reassuring that some of these
-------
were mentioned in your April 21st letter. However, we state them again because the SAB
believes they are foundational to a transformed EPA research program that meets the needs of a
more complex view of human and environmental health. The ordering of these issues does not
imply any particular prioritization.
• EPA should increase its efforts to address issue evaluation and management in an
integrated manner that recognizes the complexity of the world in which the
problems occur.
As your letter recognizes, we now see more clearly than ever that human health and
environmental problems are interrelated, are often associated with multiple stressors, and
often involve exposures from more than one medium. Although such complexity makes
designing effective solutions ever more challenging, the SAB believes effective
integration of the science is the key to generating knowledge essential for credible
science-based decision-making. This message was certainly emphasized in the SAB
"Reducing Risk" report of 19901, the SAB's 2000 report "Toward Integrated
Environmental Decision Making11," as well as in a recent National Research Council
report, "Science and Decisions111," that addresses risk assessment in decision-making.
• EPA should support new research frameworks to overcome barriers that now limit
development of knowledge of integrated environmental problems and their
solutions
As you suggest, through its strategic planning process, EPA has already begun to design a
program to conduct integrated multidisciplinary research on complex environmental
issues. However, if integration is to be more than a slogan, EPA must expand its
investments in new interdisciplinary research fields that will require sustained financial
commitments in order to be successful. The SAB stands ready to provide the external
scientific perspectives and advice necessary to assist in this transformation.
• EPA should move to restore the budget for research and development in order to
maintain the U.S. as an international leader in environmental protection.
The SAB understands the challenges raised by the current state of the economy. EPA
must commit to establishing a research base that will make it possible for the nation to
acquire the knowledge needed to address the difficult environmental problems that we
now face and which will only grow in complexity and magnitude in the future. Examples
of such challenging issues include urban sustainability and the built environment; land
use, renewable energy, water resources and climate change; materials management and
human health; and the wise conservation of resources.
• EPA should develop more robust partnerships and innovative approaches to
supporting cutting-edge research and development, both domestically and
internationally.
-------
Your letter notes that EPA has long worked with other organizations on environmental
issues. Because of its unique role as an agency established to provide overarching
consideration and management of the nation's environmental problems, EPA should take
a leadership role in advocating for an even richer cooperative and collaborative approach
to learning about and solving complex environmental problems. Therefore EPA should
seek new and innovative opportunities to expand the ways in which it both supports R&D
and cooperates with government and other organizations, including those in the
international arena.
• Research and operational capacity in the social sciences should be augmented.
Decision, Behavioral and Social Sciences are critical to framing, designing and
implementing EPA decision processes and to the effective and credible resolution of
environmental problems. These sciences are key elements in effective problem
formulation, risk characterization, benefits evaluation, and to engaging with citizens and
stakeholders on needed actions on these problems.
• EPA should take the lead in assessing the environmental and health implications of
energy and climate change policies
Energy and climate change issues stand out in their importance to the nation's and the
world's well-being. The EPA should be the nation's lead agency in analyzing the human
health and environmental implications of energy and climate change policies and guiding
the country to optimal strategies.
Members of the SAB look forward to discussing our initial recommendations in this letter
with you at your earliest convenience. We plan to provide more specific advice regarding longer-
term science needs as the result of the study that I discussed with you recently aimed at
strengthening EPA's risk assessment practices in a more integrated way. We intend to report to
you on that study in 2010.
Sincerely,
/Signed/
Dr. Deborah L. Swackhamer
Chair
US EPA Science Advisory Board
-------
1 US EPA SAB (1990) Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection, SAB-EC-90-
021, September 1990. The SAB recommended that EPA target opportunities for the greatest risk reduction and that a
stove-pipe approach to environmental protection was no longer suited for use in addressing real world
environmental problems.
11 US EPA SAB (2000) Toward Integrated Environmental Decision-Making, EPA-SAB-EC-00-011, April 2000. In
this report, the SAB reinforced its call for a more integrated approach to environmental management noting that a
".. .focus on assessing and controlling chemical contaminants pollutant by pollutant in single media has resulted in a
regulatory system that is neither systematic nor comprehensive," and which ".. .can be inefficient both in reducing
the major burdens of environmental impacts on human health and ecosystems and in allocating society's resources
in the face of multiple demands on limited budgets."
111 National Research Council (2009) Science and Decisions Advancing Risk Assessment, Committee on Improving
Risk Analysis Approaches Used by the U.S. EPA., Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, reinforces the
call for integration in its framework for risk-based decision-making that imbeds risk assessment within a phased
process that links assessment to existing real-world conditions and the ultimate use of the assessment itself in
managing that risk.
------- |