Section 319
               NONPOINT SOORCE PROGRAM SUCCESS STORY
 Watershed Management Improves Lake Water Quality

\A/citprhnrl\/ Imnrnx/prl  Excessive nutrients from agricultural fields and residential
                          "'    activity resulted in eutrophication of Banner Creek Reservoir.
 The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) added the reservoir to the state's
 2002 Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters. In conjunction with local,
 state and federal agencies, the Jackson County Conservation District used  education and
 information efforts and cost share incentives to promote management practices to reduce
 loading of bacteria, nutrients and sediment. Subsequent monitoring in 2003 and 2007
 indicated that phosphorus and  chlorophyll in the lake had declined to acceptable  levels,
 allowing KDHE to remove the lake from Kansas' 2008 303(d) list of impaired waters.
 Problem
 Banner Creek Reservoir in northeast Kansas was
 constructed as a multipurpose, small lake serving
 as the water supply for the city of Holton and rural
 Jackson County. Banner Creek Reservoir encom-
 passes 535 acres and was built during 1994-1997
 to supply water to Holton and Jackson County, as
 well as to provide recreation opportunities for north-
 east Kansas. The 12,000-acre watershed draining
 to the reservoir is 88 percent grass and woodland
 with the balance being chiefly cropland. Livestock
 production, principally cattle, is prevalent over a
 third of the watershed.

 Sampling in 1998 and 1999 indicated that chlo-
 rophyll and phosphorus levels were above the
 state guidelines for Kansas water supply reser-
 voirs—12 parts per billion (ppb) for chlorophyll a
 and 22 ppb for phosphorus. Algae blooms, induced
 by excessive nutrients such as phosphorus from
 agricultural and residential lands, impair water sup-
 ply with taste and odor problems, degrade aquatic
 life integrity and hamper recreation use on the lake.
 Kansas added the lake to its 2002 CWA section
 303(d) list because of the 1998-1999 conditions.
 Project Highlights
 As part of its small lake program, Jackson County
 Conservation District developed and implemented
 a nonpoint source management plan for the
 Banner Creek watershed. The Conservation District
 promoted a diverse suite of practices applied in the
                                 Figure 1. Cattle at
                                 feeder bale in the
                                 foreground and an
                                 alternative water
                                 supply pond in the
                                 background.
           Figure 2.
       Snow-covered
     alternative water
     source pond and
    perimeter fencing
      in a tributary to
       Banner Creek
          Reservoir.
watershed from 1997 to 2007, relying on an aggres-
sive education and information program to increase
awareness of the impacts of agricultural and
residential activity on the quality of the lake. Failing
septic systems were repaired or replaced above the
lake, and livestock access to the streams flowing
to the reservoir was managed by providing alterna-
tive water supplies (ponds and tanks) (Figure 1),
cross-fencing (Figure 2), and a portable windbreak
to provide loafing areas for cattle away from riparian
areas.

-------
           Landowners developed nutrient management plans
           for 132 acres of grazing land and 37 acres of crop-
           land, and converted 36 acres of cropland to native
           grass. They restored additional acres of brome
           grassland through reseeding. Using CWA section
           319 funds, the project partners hired a water quality
           coordinator to  promote agricultural producers'
           participation in the available cost-share programs.
           Results
           Lake sampling in 2003 and 2007 showed lower
           chlorophyll levels. Average chlorophyll a con-
           centrations were below 12 ppb and near the
           newly proposed water quality standard of 10 ppb.
           Phosphorus levels in the lake also declined,  lending
           confidence that the initial watershed management
           efforts are reducing the phosphorus loadings that
           affect the trophic  state of the lake. The 2003-2007
           average total phosphorus concentration of 22 ppb
           lies below suggested guideline of 25-30 ppb for
           lakes in the Western Corn Belt ecoregion (Figure 3).
           Consequently, KDHE removed Banner Creek
           Reservoir from the 2008 CWA section 303(d) list,
           offsetting the need to develop a nutrient total maxi-
           mum daily load for the lake and  its watershed.
                  Banner Creek Lake Quality
                Chla
                                        TotalP
                           Parameter
                        1998-99 12003-07
Figure 3. Chlorophyll and phosphorus levels before and after
watershed management.
Partners and Funding
The Jackson County Conservation District part-
nered with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
(USDA's) Natural Resources Conservation Service,
KDHE, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Public
Wholesale Water Supply District #18, Northeast
Kansas Environmental Services and Kansas State
University, State Conservation Commission, Kansas
Corporation Commission, the city of Holton,
Jackson County Commissioners, and Glacial Hills
Resource Conservation and Development Program
to develop and implement this watershed manage-
ment plan. An initial CWA section 319 program
grant of $102,145 supported the water quality
coordinator position and outreach programs and
demonstration projects, such as the portable
windbreak.

A subsequent CWA section 319  grant of $48,362
further supported watershed plan implementation
efforts. These funds were matched with county
in-kind funds and cost-share funds from the Kansas
Water Plan Fund, totaling more than $155,000.
Additionally, USDA's Environmental Quality
Incentive Program funded implementation of best
management practices. Because only a fraction of
the watershed has been treated  and the lake is on
the threshold between good quality and deteriora-
tion, ongoing implementation will continue in order
to maintain the integrity of the lake. Five-year pro-
jections of implementation costs totaling $584,000
are needed to further reduce nutrient and sediment
loads.
\
                U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Office of Water
                Washington, DC

                EPA841-F-09-001D
                June 2009
For additional information contact:
Amanda Reed
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
785-296-7165
akreed@kdheks.gov

-------