\
at
/
Ocean Current and Wave Measurements at the
Canaveral Harbor Ocean Dredged Material
Disposal Site
January 2003 through February 2004
-------
EPA-904-R-05-001
January 2005
Ocean Current and Wave Measurements
at the
Canaveral Harbor Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site
January 2003 through February 2004
By:
Christopher J. McArthur, P.E.
Coastal Section
Water Management Division
&
Mel Parsons
Ecological Evaluation Section
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
with funding from:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Jacksonville District
Under Interagency Agreement #RW-96-94593601
MIPR #W32CS530026705
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4
Atlanta, Georgia
-------
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Methods 1
2.1 Study Area 1
2.2 Deployment Periods 2
2.3 Instrumentation 2
2.4 Data Analysis 3
3.0 Results 4
3.1 Currents 4
3.2 Waves 7
4.0 Summary and Conclusions 7
5.0 References 9
Tables
Table 1 Deployment periods 2
Table 2 ADCP Settings 3
Table 3 Principal Tidal Constituents at the Canaveral ODMDS 5
Table 4 Summary of Harmonic Analysis of Water Depth 6
Table 5 Summary of Harmonic Analysis of Currents 6
Table 6 Recommended STFATE ambient velocity parameters 8
Appendices
Appendix A Figures
Appendix B Data Files
Appendix C Complete Tidal Analysis Output from T_TIDE
-------
Ocean Current and Wave Measurements at the
Canaveral Harbor Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It is the responsibility of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) under the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) of 1972 to
manage and monitor each of the Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites (ODMDSs) designated by
the EPA pursuant to Section 102 of MPRSA. MPRSA, the Water Resources Development Act
(WRDA) of 1992, and a Memorandum of Agreement between EPA and COE require the joint
development of site management and monitoring plans (SMMP) to specifically address the disposal of
dredged material at ODMDSs. Additionally, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between
EPA Region 4 and the COE South Atlantic Division specifies that it is in the best interest of the EPA
and the COE to act in partnership concerning the management and monitoring of all ODMDSs.
Management of ODMDSs involves regulating the times, the quantity, and the physical/chemical
characteristics of dredged material that is dumped at the site; establishing disposal controls, conditions,
and requirements to avoid and minimize potential impacts to the marine environment; and monitoring the
site environs to verify that unanticipated or significant adverse effects are not occurring from past or
continued use of the site and that permit terms are met.
A SMMP was developed and finalized by the EPA and COE for the Canaveral ODMDS in October
2001. The SMMP outlines strategies for monitoring the ODMDS and provides as an appendix a
Long-Term Monitoring Strategy (LTMS) for the ODMDS. A study of the disposed material nearfield
fate and disposal site capacity was included as part of the Canaveral ODMDS SMMP and Long-Term
Monitoring Strategy (LTMS). As part of such a study, site specific data are needed. This includes
physical properties such as grain size, density, and erosive properties of disposed dredged material and
current and wave data at the ODMDS. The physical properties of the dredged material have been
characterized under a previous work effort (SNL, 2001).
In February 2003, EPA Region 4 and the COE Jacksonville District entered into a joint agreement to
jointly manage and monitor ODMDSs within the Jacksonville District. Task 1, subtask A of the
agreement was to characterize the current and wave climate at the Canaveral ODMDS over a year.
This report details the results of that study.
2.0 METHODS
2.1 Study Area
An area approximately 0.5 nautical miles west of the Canaveral ODMDS and 2.6 nautical miles east of
Cocoa Beach, Florida (28ฐ19.456' N, 80ฐ33.506' W) was selected for the instrument deployment.
-------
The instrument location is shown in figure 1. The location was selected based on an survey of the area
of bottom sediments with the highest bearing capacity (McArthur, 2002). The depth at the instrument
deployment was 15 meters (48 feet).
2.2 Deployment Periods
The base for the instrumentation was designed and built for EPA by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory in Miami, Florida.
The base was deployed in June, 2002. The instrument required four deployments each of 3 to 4
months beginning on January 22, 2003. The deployment periods are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Deployment Periods
Deployment Date-Time
1/22/2003 1:30PM
4/27/2003 1:30PM
7/11/2003 1:45PM
10/26/03 5: 00PM
Recovery Date-Time
4/26/2003 1:OOPM
7/1 1/2003 3: 15PM
10/26/03 1:15PM
2/22/04 1:45 AM1
Duration
93 days, 23.5 hrs
75 days, 1.75 hrs
106 days, 23.5 hrs
118 days, 8. 75 hrs
1 Instrument stopped recording due to power limits. Instrument recovered on 2/24/04.
2.3 Instrumentation
A 600 kHz Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler(ADCP) developed by RD Instruments was used to
measure wave parameters and currents. ADCPs work by transmitting sound along four separate
beams at a fixed frequency and listening to the echoes returned by sound scatterers, such as plankton
or small particles, in the water. By calculating the Doppler shift and time of travel of the echoes, the
ADCP can calculate velocities for various depths in the water. The calculations performed by the
instrument split the water column into equally sized depth cells or bins (in this case the bin size was set
at 0.5 m). In each bin, an average velocity vector is calculated. The raw data from the instrument is
reported as a velocity magnitude and direction for each bin.
To calculate wave parameters, the wave orbital velocities below the surface are measured by the
ADCP. To get a surface height spectrum the velocity spectrum is translated to surface displacement
using linear wave kinematics. The ADCP can also measure wave height spectra from its pressure
sensor and from echo ranging the surface. For directional spectrum, each depth cell of the ADCP can
be considered to be an independent sensor that makes a measurement of one component of the wave
field velocity. The ensemble of depth cells along the four beams constitutes an array of sensors from
which magnitude and directional information about the wave field can be determined. (Strong, 2000)
-2-
-------
In this study the velocity or current profile is sampled every 15 minutes and waves every three hours.
Instrument settings are summarized in table 2.
Table 2: ADCP Settings
Number of Bins
Bin Size
Pings per Ensemble- Currents
Interval - Currents (h:m:s)
Burst Duration - Waves (minutes)
Burst Interval - Waves (h:m:s)
Salinity (ppt)
Magnetic Variation (degrees)
Temperature (C)
First Bin Range (m)
Last Bin Range (m)
Battery Usage (Wh) / Maximum Deployment Duration (days)
Available Storage / Required Storage (MB)
Minimum Observable Wave Period for non-directional (sec)
Minimum Observable Wave Period for directional (sec)
Samples per Wave Burst
35
0.50m
360
00:15:00
20
03:00:00
35
-5.7
27.3
1.5
19.02
1310/121.5
192/183
2.04
3.05
2400
The ADCP was mounted in a concrete base with it's face oriented up at approximately 0.5 meters
above the bottom. Therefore, the first bin measurement is actually approximately two meters above the
bottom. The base appears to have subsided into the substrate over the course of the deployment as
evidenced by an increase in the average depth reading of approximately 0.4 meters and visual
observations.
2.4 Data Analysis
Raw binary data files from the instrument were converted utilizing the RD Instruments software
WaveMonฎ into binary waves data files and a binary current data files. Current data was further
extracted utilizing the RD Instruments software BBLISTฎ for further analysis. BBLISTฎ exports
-3-
-------
current velocities and directions for each bin (depth) over the entire time series. Wave data was
extracted utilizing the RD Instruments software Wave Viewฎ for further analysis. Output included
water depth, significant wave height (average of the 1/3 largest wave), dominant wave period, and
dominant wave direction.
Because the ADCP reports current data for bins beyond the surface, the bins beyond the surface need
to be removed from the record. The depth and surface bins were determined using the depths reported
in the Wave Viewฎ software from the pressure sensor and echo return intensity. The depth was
determined to vary from 13 to 15 meters above the ADCP corresponding to bins 24 to 28.
Additionally, the surface can provide scatterers in the water column that can overwhelm the side lobe
suppression of the transducers. Therefore, RD Instruments (1996) cautions that data from the upper
6% of the water column can be contaminated. Echo intensity and percent good values for each bin
were examined. Percent good values report percentages of 1) 3-beam transformations, 2)
transformations rejected, 3) more than one bad beam and 4) 4-beam transformations for each bin and
ensemble. These were examined and it was found that there was consistently a high percentage of 4
beam transformations in bins 1 through 21. Therefore, it was determined that bins 1 through 21 provide
reliable current data for this analysis. This correlates to 1.5 to 12 meters above the instrument face.
Surface, bottom and depth average currents were analyzed. Bin 20 (11.5 meters) and bin 2 (2.5
meters) were selected to represent surface and bottom currents respectively. To determine average
currents, the bins were averaged from bin 1 to 21. To average over the bins, each corresponding
magnitude and direction value were used to calculate a north and east component for that bin at the
specific time(ensemble). The north and east components were then averaged for each ensemble.
These average north and average east components were then used to calculate an average current
magnitude and direction for each ensemble. A C++ program, CurAvg.cpp, was written to perform
these calculations over the entire data set. Tidal components were examined after smoothing the data
over one hour periods utilizing both a low pass filter (Godin, 1972) and classical tidal harmonic analysis
using a set of MATLAB programs, T_Tide (Pawlowicz et. al., 2002). Harmonic analysis was
conducted for a 1 year data record beginning February 1, 2003.
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 Currents
A current rose for depth average currents for the entire deployment period is shown in figure 2.
Currents are predominately in the north and south direction and rarely exceed 25 cm/sec in magnitude.
Quarterly current roses for depth average currents are shown in figure 3. Seasonal differences due not
appear to be significant. However, the second quarter lacked a strong southerly component. In both
figures 2 and 3, it can be seen that northerly currents occur twice as frequently as southerly currents.
Figure 4 also shows the directional difference between the four quarters. The second quarter (May-
July) had the highest percentage of northerly directed currents, but in all quarters, northerly directed
-4-
-------
currents accounted for approximately 50 percentage of the measurements. Figure 5 compares the
magnitude of the currents for the four quarters. The highest percentage of measurements for each
quarter was between 2.5 and 5 cm/sec accounting for about 25 percent of the measurements and in all
quarters 75 percent of the measurement were below 10 cm/sec. The net direction of transport as
shown by a progressive vector diagram is to the north northeast (see figure 6).
The above discussions were for depth averaged currents. Near surface and near bottom currents were
also examined independently. Near surface currents are 1.5 to 3.5 meters below the surface depending
on tidal state. Near bottom currents are approximately 2.5 meters above the instrument face (3 meters
above the bottom). Both near surface and near bottom currents were dominated by north and south
currents with the predominate current direction to the north (see figure 7). Figure 7 also shows that
surface currents had more frequent easterly directed currents than westerly and bottom currents had
more frequent westerly directed currents than easterly currents. As is typically the case, surface
currents are stronger than near bottom currents (see figure 8). The median surface current was 10
cm/sec whereas the median bottom currents was 6 cm/sec. The depth average median current velocity
was 7 cm/sec. The net direction of transport (figure 6) is to the northeast for near surface currents and
to the northwest for near bottom currents.
A low pass filter was applied to data smoothed over one hour periods to analyze non-tidal variability.
Results for the north/south and east/west current components for August are shown in figures 9 and 10,
respectively. Harmonic analysis revealed that the principal tidal constituents are Kb Ob M2, N2 and S2
(see table 3) with M2 dominating. Peak north/south tidal currents were on the order of 2 to 5 cm/sec
and peak east/west tidal currents were on the order of 1 to 4 cm/sec. Corresponding tidal excursions
are 500 meters in the north/south direction and 250 meters in the east/west direction. Tables 4 and 5
provide a summary of the tidal constituent parameters for water depth and currents, respectively.
Appendix C provides the complete tidal analysis output from T_tide. Figure 11 shows the tidal cycle as
represented by water depth for both the actual data set and a synthesized data set utilizing the
calculated tidal constituents. Two distinct tides are seen per day.
Table 3: Principal Tidal Constituents at the Canaveral ODMDS
Symbol
Q!
K!
N2
M2
S2
Name
Principal lunar diurnal
Lunisolar diurnal
Lunar elliptic semidiurnal
Principal lunar semidiurnal
Principal solar semidiurnal
Frequency (cycles/hour)
0.0387
0.0418
0.0790
0.0805
0.0833
Period (hours)
25.84
23.92
12.66
12.42
12.00
-5-
-------
Table 4: Summary of Harmonic Analysis of Water Depth
Symbol
o,
K,
N2
M2
S2
Amplitude (meters)
0.0691
0.1251
0.1200
0.4815
0.0601
Phase (degrees)
146.06
129.83
225.97
241.13
239.79
Table 5: Summary of Harmonic Analysis of Currents
Symbol
Major Axis
(cm/s)
Minor Axis
(cm/s)
Inclination
(cc from east-degrees)
Phase
(degrees)
Surface Currents
o,
K,
N2
M2
S2
0.9272
0.6333
0.6849
2.2153
0.9283
0.0590
0.1823
0.1222
0.0227
-0.1942
54.50
157.89
152.92
155.2
169.01
303.23
10.41
126.18
149.14
140.7
Bottom Currents
o,
K,
N2
M2
S2
.04235
0.9214
0.375
1.8874
0.3538
0.2303
0.1702
0.1078
-0.0112
-0.1212
90.92
68.44
140.97
146.19
112.40
316.73
293.00
112.08
131.33
111.78
Depth Averaged Currents
o,
K,
N2
M2
S2
0.6614
1.0264
0.5299
2.0654
0.4097
0.1266
-0.1280
0.0274
-0.0252
0.0534
79.17
92.76
151.87
151.98
134.89
324.60
312.50
128.32
146.75
115.56
-6-
-------
3.2 Waves
A wave rose for the entire deployment period is shown in figure 12. Waves are predominately out of
the east and few exceed 2.5 meters in height. Figure 13 shows the wave roses for each quarter.
Figures 14 and 15 show box plots of the monthly significant wave heights and wave periods,
respectively. Monthly median significant wave heights ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 meters. The highest
median wave heights and waves occurred during hurricane season. Figure 16 shows the major
tropical storms for 2003. The peak wave height of greater than 3 meters occurred during the passage
of Hurricane Isabel on September 17th. Wave periods were typically in the 5 to 10 second range.
Histograms of significant wave height and wave period are shown in figures 17 and 18. The median
and mean wave height was 0.75 and 0.82 meters, respectively. The median and mean wave period
was 8.5 and 8.1 seconds, respectively.
Significant wave height values were compared to offshore values collected by the National Data
Bouy Center (NDBC). NDBC values are from station 41009, which is located twenty nautical miles
east of Cape Canaveral, FL at 28.50ฐ N and 80.18ฐ W. Box plots of wave height and wave period for
station 41009 are provided in figures 19 and 20. Figure 21 shows comparisons of wave height and
period measurements for portions of January, February, and March, 2003. Figure 22 shows a plot of
NDBC significant wave height versus the ADCP collected significant wave height. There appears to
be a linear relationship for these months with a R2 value of 0.54. Overall, the NDBC data seems to
trend well with the measured significant wave height considering the distance between the
measurements. The Canaveral ADCP wave heights are approximately one third of that measured at
the NDBC station.
4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Currents in the vicinity of the Canaveral ODMDS tend to the north northeast paralleling the coast.
There are no seasonal trends in the data, however, the highest depth averaged currents were
observed during the first deployment quarter (February - April 2003). Maximum surface currents
exceeded 40 cm/sec. The median surface current was 10 cm/sec whereas the median bottom current
was 6 cm/sec. The depth averaged median current was 7 cm/sec. Currents are not dominated by
tides although there exists a tidal component. Sandia National Labs (2001) determined that
velocities on the order of 16 cm/sec are needed to initiate erosion of Canaveral Harbor dredged
material. Near bottom currents of this magnitude or greater occur approximately 20 percent of the
time.
As expected, waves in the vicinity of the Canaveral ODMDS are out of the east. The highest
measured waves were in excess of 3 meters. The highest waves occurred during late hurricane
season through the winter months (August 2003 - February 2004). The median significant wave
height was 0.75 meters and the median wave period was 8.5 seconds. Wave periods are of sufficient
length to influence bottom velocities at the depths of the ODMDS.
Current data from this study will be used to update the STFATE model inputs for dredged material
evaluations. According to the data in this report, these should be revised in accordance with table 6:
-7-
-------
Table 6: Recommended STFATE ambient velocity parameters
Existing Velocities (fps)
Proposed Revised Velocities
Depth (ft)
average-logarithmic
Magnitude
0.33
Direction
0
Depth (ft)
8.2
37.7
Magnitude
0.33
0.2
Direction
15ฐ from North
348ฐ from North
Data will also be used to model the long-term fate of dredged material at the Canaveral ODMDS
utilizing MDFATE and LTFATE. Required MDFATE and LTFATE input parameters include: wave
height, wave period and wave direction at three hour intervals and the tidal harmonic constituents as
determined either from analysis of current and water depth measurements or from databases.
Sufficient site specific data now exists to conduct site capacity and disposed dredged material nearfield
fate studies for the Canaveral ODMDS. The MDFATE and LTFATE models that will be used for the
studies are currently under revision by the Corps of Engineers Engineering Research and Development
Center (ERDC). Once completed, modeling of the disposal site can commence.
-8-
-------
5.0 REFERENCES
Coastal Engineering Research Center (1984). Shore Protection Manual. Department of the Army
Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS.
Godin, Gabriel (1972). The Analysis of Tides. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 264pp.
McArthur, Christopher (2002). Survey Report: Canaveral ODMDS Current Meter
Reconnaissance Survey and Miami ODMDS Monioting Study-Equipment Deployment and
Calibration (111). U.S. EPA Region 4. May 2002.
Pawlowicz, R., B. Beardsley, and S. Lentz, (2002) Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error
estimates inMATLAB using T TIDE, Computers and Geosciences 28 (2002), pp. 929-937.
RD Instruments (1996) Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler: Principles of Operation, A Practical Primer.
January 1996, San Diego.
Strong, Brandon (2000). Workhorse ADCP Multi-Directional Wave Gauge Primer. RD
Instruments. Oct. 2000.
Sandia National Laboratories (2001). Canaveral ODMDS Dredged Material Erosion Rate Analysis.
Carlsbad, N.M.May, 2001.
-9-
-------
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
-------
List of Figures
Figure 1 Instrument location
Figure 2 Depth averaged current rose
Figure 3 Quarterly depth averaged current roses
Figure 4 Quarterly current direction histograms
Figure 5 Quarterly current magnitude histograms
Figure 6 Progressive vector diagram
Figure 7 Current direction histogram for depth average, bottom and surface currents
Figure 8 Current magnitude histogram for depth average, bottom and surface currents
Figure 9 Filtered currents (north component) for August, 2003
Figure 10 Filtered currents (east component) for August, 2003
Figure 11 August 2003 measured and synthesized water depth.
Figure 12 Wave height rose
Figure 13 Quarterly wave roses
Figure 14 Box Plot of significant wave height
Figure 15 Box plot of peak wave period
Figure 16 National Hurricane Center 2003 storm track chart
Figure 17 Significant wave height histogram
Figure 18 Dominant wave period histogram
Figure 19 Box plot of significant wave height at the National Buoy Center station 41009
Figure 20 Box plot of dominant wave period at the National Buoy Center station 41009
Figure 21 Comparison of National Data Buoy Center station 41009 and EPA ADCP significant
wave height and dominant wave period measurements for portions of January,
February and March, 2003.
Figure 22 Regression analysis of National Data Buoy Center station 41009 and EPA ADCP
significant wave height measurements for portions of January, February, and March of
2003
-------
Figure 1: Instrument Location
-------
North
0
315
45
270
Current Speed
(cm/sec)
I >5- 10
ED>10- 15
I l>15-20
>20 - 25
225
135
180
Figure 2: Depth averaged current rose.
-------
North
0
315
45
270
90
225
135
180
North
0
315
45
270
90
225
135
180
North
0
315
45
270
270
Noyember 03
-/January '04
225
135
180
Figure 3: Quarterly depth averaged current roses.
-------
60%
Depth Average
Near Bottom
Surface
0%
North
East South
Current Direction
West
Figure 4: Quarterly current direction histograms.
-------
50%
0%
- 80%
- 60%
Depth Average
Near Bottom
Surface
Depth Average
O- Near Bottom
w Surface
100%
- 40%
o
CD
c
cr
CD
CD
In
D
E
D
O
- 20%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Current Speed (cm/sec)
Figure 5: Quarterly current magnitude histograms.
-------
1600
1400-
1200-
1000 -
_^:
8 soo H
o
W
600 -
400 -
200 -
0-
-200
Feb '04
Surface Currents
Feb '04
Bottom
Currents
Jan '03
-200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
East/West Distance (km)
Figure 6: Progressive vector diagram.
-------
60%
Depth Average
Near Bottom
Surface
0%
North
East South
Current Direction
West
Figure 7: Current direction histogram for depth average, bottom and surface currents.
-------
c;nn/ '
ou /o
40% -
>> 30% -
c
(U
LL 20% -
10% -
OOA 4)
-r/-
j
II
r
ii
ii
,^>^
V
\ '
V
ii
X
_^
ir
^ ฃ^ /-\ ฃ*. A A -irvrvn/
^ *
f" *"""""
r
r "
r
Depth Average
I I Near Bottom
I Surface
Depth Average
-O- Near Bottom
T Surface
ill .1
II n _
W 1 WW /U
- 80%
- 70%
o
CD
- 60% &
- 50% CD
"co
- 40% 1
- 30% ฐ
- 20%
- 10%
no/
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Current Speed (cm/sec)
Figure 8: Current magnitude histograms for depth average, bottom, and surface currents.
-------
20
en
E
o
o
_0
-------
o
_o
-------
14.8
12.8
8/1/03
Mean
8/8/03
8/15/03
8/22/03
8/29/03
8/8/03
8/15/03
8/22/03
8/29/03
Figure 11: August 2003 measured and synthesized water depth. Synthesized water depth from
harmonic constituents.
-------
North
0
315
45
270
225
90
30%
135
180
Wave Height
(meters)
<=0.5
>1 - 1.5
>1.5-2
>2-2.5
>2.5
Figure 12: Wave height rose.
-------
315
270
225
315
270
225
North
0
45
0% 10% 20% 30%
Frequency
90
135
180
North
0
45
0% 10% 20% 30%
Frequency
90
135
180
315
270
225
315
270
225
North
0
45
90
135
180
North
0
45
November '03
January '04
Wave Height
(meters)
0.5 - 1
1 - 1.5
EZl>1.5-2
F"\>2 -2.5
I |>2.5
90
20% 30%
ncy
135
180
Figure 13: Quarterly wave roses.
-------
0 ^
3.0 -
2.5 -
to 2.0 -
CD
*-
CD
^^
^ 1.5 -
1.0 -
0.5 -
n n -
1
4
4
i
!
1
I
J
L
c
I
+
<
n
-
1
1
+
1
4.
-1-
ซ
1
ซ
ซ
1
<
t
-,
-
! : _i
i
i
i
t
Wt
1
1
1
i
i
ซ
-1
U
, i -t- : ! =j= i
<
ฃ
r
T
i
ฃ>
^
d)
/
1 /
^>
,5 -3
5
1
^7-
s
^r
1
i
ฃ
1
r
1
&
i
r
1.
1
2003 # ^
o <ง
f ^> '
m ฃ
C
(7
Q
)
P
J
i
*
^
7
- 10
-6 "0
0
1 1
- 4
- 2
n
u.
Figure 14: Box plot of significant wave height. The boundary of the box closest to zero indicates the 25th percentile, the line
within the box marks the median, and the boundary of the box farthest from zero indicates the 75th percentile. Whiskers
above and below the box indicate the 90th and 10th percentiles. Dots represents outliers. * indicates partial month.
-------
30
25 -
20 -
T3
ง 15H
-------
120" 115" 110- 105"- 100
45"
40"
35'-
30"
25"
20"
1 $"
10*
5^
N
O
t
0
S
o
j
t
h
**
*C
1- NATIONAL
:I1 +
> "t
95- 90" 85" 80- 75" TO" 65- 60" 55" 50- 45" 40' ฃ& 30" \ 25ฐ 20' 15' 10' S'West 0"East 5'
sfCljf
HURRICANE CENTER
J vl^^ t mป^WซF~ _jf^ 09 - ' "' C ''"' "
F" ; ^" HN _..-'" X* ^ -v~*; .,.**" '
= ' -f *.-"" 4.'"' M- i^"'
< ' ATLANTIC GULF OF MEXICO HURRICANE TRACK CHART =.'ฃ'?. ~" -'' ซ>"
i ซ.,..,...,...............,...,............[[[
Z003
DUMBER TYPE NSME DATE
1 T ANA 20 -24 Apr.
2 T BILL 29 J-tin. - 02 Jul.
3 H CLAUDETTE OS - 17 Jul.
1 H 16 -21 M.
S H 14 -17 Aug.
6 H 2? Aug. - 08 Sep.
7 T GRACE 30 Ayj. - 02 Sep.
8 T 03 -OS Sep.
9 H ISABEl 04-ปSep,
10 H JUAtl 24-Z9Sep.
11 H 26 Sep. - 0? Oct.
12 T LAiRY 01 - 04 Oct.
13 T MMOY 10 14 Oct.
14 1 NICHOLAS 13-2300.
IS T ODETTE 04-070ee.
16 T 07 -11 tec
!3'.-j>' --.-- "--K_ '7 ~""v/
\ *...--- " '"--.'
\ ?x**^>^
-s '..J 50 -
y " /*-/'V"'
X ' -' I0 if ' "-
Sป- - *
----- " ' - ;0-%"l--12- rf.**!1
""----- - 96 ------ f7 *'
\ . -. -^.
'"-'"",' ' " '--. --
--:"-.. . __r-."i
"""--: ^ *
^^^A * &... x ^
*J :
_ 4ฉ'AN "
~ "" :
:
, _w_ ! _ - -
f% - :
ซ*._i * : n * ' !-'''
*. -. " ซ
:,* 21 * It ;
95* 90" 85' 8
' - '--Y-'
I
":'-'' "~\
'-. 'ii.'
' 'V"'r
"'" " -V5 *****'. !
. - &" ^ a'
'" "^ -, ' ; _ "^
-~"-,.f *- ;' ^ff
f^*' 'f "^3^ =!- \ J'^ ::
" "" " \?) ' - '^'" )
.;--... '* + _/" " """" ""'
' -. 4* - ^ -3 ""-" " ' .' ; /*f^
4 " -j|- ' '" - ,. . ~""'(
f' \9 ซJMJ
s"' '""- / ";" ?'=-T- ~ y' *-
\ ,.- vCX
= - - ,- ._L"i0 \H*
." -'c" -.. -3|-
V-'''' 08 '
'^'- '-- f ^ .' '
^"",. '!;--ป'. -1"*
*.- * I"* 1 ' "l?" ~ ; ฃ
'' -^' ':) -ป*L :' *
;_^K;1-f^;'j 12l*t,;3fe.
^"^"N^ c^\* is *;;
- -^ ._ ^^^^ -/ *^" u'
" '" *"": 7'i-<.i,-..-: 'rf .0?"
"10 = --- ^ , ^ v ' *m:&_
""*
:iฅM*"ฐS
-.----- ' -*' '-- ' {-
.,->^ ---
40*W _.__.--- ^;ฃ
" " . .a--** ''. '
.^^--jT
"25 ._.-- "
. JL *-: s
[[[ ::: T' - - " "-f- ' --" '*(,^(wซ,5
^' -,, .^ .* ^9tft^~~- -; _ JH -j, _ ...-._ - .
\_ ^*^L J" ' -! . ^ ....
Cy. ' | . J- '.-*" ,.--"' ' " <*-""' **
*5 """ 'Ti ' * , - ,-""' - " '"""
., _ - ^_^^, , ,^ _ ^_ __ _ .. -- _ ._ ^/*"
jFf '/* ,-""""" '" *% , = !
^..- >*.*** ^*r f /ป>ซ. ftg -." ', . %*' .'
^'.,J.. - .-;. ; jf *M^> . ' ' .,.---"" "
".,_ =v.-^ : '*' %': - , --"*'
;' ^y;,i ^ ^ ".."-"' " ^.-^"'v./ ^
L^- ?ป"- ^jjip; : __ ..-.-" , ' . ... - "
**"%' ^^^""^ : * ' ..,-"'
'%#ซ'" ; !" : ' ป -""*
'ป ; ; _;_v--: 2Bi _ ;-'"_ ' - ' '- . '
: :- . : " 19 , - M a , - - -~-
: B7, ---: _ - 4 ' - ----- :
; .: -.---* . - .------ -/. :
: rsa i .,.'ป - -" - - '
' : L:-*' '' - - .,'.
" T tr i \F:"T '- ซ * - so
; ^ .51-^ , is '- - - ... ' ' - ..''"
-ซ*. ^ *^wMป^f' ' :-^* --""'* u: - .'-"'" i
jii zs; #*4^ป*-=t-^:*---"--*--.' 25 w:" " ;
^*---- M*2g%+__ i--^- >r '-. ^ '. **-------"'- ' - *i|
'-. M . i*!'*4' ฃ"'"'' '.-- " ป f - - -
jfe::^_ i ; ' ^ _*"' __.....--""'
i DJ-. ----.. ;=.%J *::...ป J*,-. '-2? ' ' ~, ' '"" ' '' V'
___:.___ *-:,: . .. .i- ---:.".-:._. - ** .,ซ!' ' v,
"x~ * . i *'""*" ji""'~7*'-"--i%'1' J8"-'-*- 2S -ป-"";
,"fT~ r >* * '.:--"*" -
*ซ:-?: * 1S 14 ll
/ i ซ M. .ปป-.,; - - -----
: ".-.' ' '* : ' * 3 ป-ป-"""-" ' ^* ff - ,- -n
-....-"-"" vr^; ; _ _ , ---ป-- - -- - -~ ; _ ' T^tJs^jTs
Hx : \__... ... 22,2; "
.;.,.. ' '-.------""" !:ซir-:ปซ '.Mป..-I,li:iv;;-,i,--,c _
.f "---* -'....__ . - - -- -, S^ITOtealSto-miST:
.. . __ ....-" -* . ",- '. ป ;. , -(1 lt-t ,jj.-
- . \ ----- ' ,. - .------" ..- '-.-..- ,-...ICปcK,c.*N,..T.t-.,r
i ... r..- :- -----j- :-,... -= --= : ' -. } - - ' *
-'{_ - --'- ---: ^-" J
45"
40'
35*
30'
25'
20'
15--
10"
5^
N
o
h
o-'
S
o
u
-------
20% -i
18% -
16% -
14% -
>- 12% -
o
c
3 10% -
O"
0
LL 8% -
6% -
4% -
2% -
Oo/
ru
70 ~| 1 1 1
0.0
j
-i
/
/
I
1
/
/
rn
I
I
'
/
/
0.5 1.0
/
x
s
X
x-
r-i
r- 100%
^ '
mean=0.82 meters
median=0.75 meters
PI l~~l i i n i 11 i _^i i _, _
- 90%
- 80%
- 70%
c
- 60% ง
D"
- 50% g>
>
"-i
CD
- 40% |
d
- 30%
- 20%
- 10%
no/
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T^ | 'l ' T1 1 1 | T 1 1 1 r U70
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Significant Wave Height (m)
Figure 17: Significant wave height histogram.
-------
o/rn/
ฃ.\J /O
20% -
^ 15% -
c
0)
D"
0)
s_
LJ- 10% -
5% -
Oo/
-
rV
70
0
/"
ft
X
'
5
/
'
/
ii
/
1
1
1
1
\
I
I
I
f
^1
f
/
i
10
/
-
/
/
-
/
/-
^^^
1 1 r~ 1
15
mean = 8.1 seconds
median = 8.5 seconds
20 25
*r\r\
1 \J\J
- 90
- 80
~T r\
- 70 >,
o
c
CD
-60 g.
CD
LJ_
- 50 CD
'^
CO
- 40 3
E
-30 d
- 20
- 10
n
30
Dominant Wave Period (seconds)
Figure 18: Dominant wave period histogram.
-------
10
9
8
ST
cc
LLJ -,
i- 7
LU
ฃ.
1 i-'*
i- b"
CD
LU
LU ^
|
ฃ 4
<
O
U_
2 3
CD
00
2|
1
1ji
0^
JA
41009 SIGNIFICANT WAVE
: i
i 4>
I *
> ฎ
9 : :
HEIGHT ( METERS) 8/1988 - 12/2001
: : ^
; ,5
S
: 3?
i I
I t
?
y :
J f
i i
j I
15
5 ซ
iS
-: f
! i
; 1
b 1
5
5
i i
5
| ]
i
j:
> {
^
f.
1
!!
*
<
T
1
; <
j
fi
I:
f
1
ซ
j
J
iN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Month
Figure 19: Box plot of significant wave height at the National Data Buoy Center station 41009.
-------
20
18
16
fn
Q
0
LLJ
CO
: 12
Q
O
cr I
i 3(
1 t
H 61
O
Q
4
ซ
2
0
41009 DOMINANT WAVE PERIOD ( SECONDS) 8/1988 - 12/2001
ฃ2>, jffi<, fS-, /2X ^"\
5 : /.
1
] I
i t
1 f:
1 1
i i;
i
fr t.
J ซ
>
1
i
i,
s
> {!
5 ซ
1
t"
1
hi t
j %
<
y ;
| !
\ ^
,;
ii 1
1 1
} {S
&
I
l
&
1 i
"
I 1 f
i i
i i
i
,
ซ
1
1
> IS
<
f
, i
F
In
5 <
X 1
5
I
5
^N FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Month
Figure 20: Box plot of dominant wave period at the National Data Buoy Center station 41009.
-------
4.0
3.5 -
3.0 -
o>
0 2.5 -
2.0 H
0
0 1 c
> i.
03
1.0 -
0.5 -
0.0
1/20/03
18
CO
_
CD
CD
03
16 -
14 -
12 -
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0
1/20/03
NDBCBuoy#41009
EPA Canaveral ADCP
2/3/03
2/17/03
3/3/03
3/17/03
NDBCBuoy#41009
EPA Canaveral ADCP
2/3/03
2/17/03
3/3/03
3/17/03
Figure 21: Comparison of National Data Buoy Center station 41009 and EPA ADCP significant wave
height and dominant wave period measurements for portions of January, February and March, 2003.
-------
1.8
1.6 -
1.4 -
I
CO
Q_
O
Q
1.0 -
0.8 -
ฃ ฐ-61
CO
O
<
Q_
LJJ
0.4 -
0.2
y=0.28+0.34x r2=0.54
1 2 3
NDBC Buoy #49001 Wave Height (meters)
Figure 22: Regression analysis of National Data Buoy Center station 41009 and EPA ADCP significant wave height
measurement for portions of January, February, and March of 2003.
-------
APPENDIX B
DATA FILES
-------
Processed Data
Canaveral_ODMDS_Current_Wave_Study.pdf Study Report
Canaveral_Bottom_Currents.xls Bottom currents listed by month.
Canaveral_Surface_Currents.xls Surface currents listed by month.
Canaveral_depth_avg_currents.xls Depth averaged currents listed by month.
Canaveral_waves.xls Wave height, period, direction and water depth by month.
lyr_bottom_currents.csv Bottom current series from 2/1/03 to 1/31/04
lyr_surface_currents.csv Surface current series from 2/1/03 to 1/31/04
lyr_depth_average.csv Depth average current series from 2/1/03 to 1/31/04
Binary Current Data
CanaveralO l_CurrentsData.OOO
CanaveralO 1 _CurrentsData. 001
CanaveralO l_CurrentsData.002
CanaveralO l_CurrentsData. 003 Deployment 1 binary ADCP current data
Canaveral02_CurrentsData. 000
Canaveral02_CurrentsData. 001
Canaveral02_CurrentsData. 002
Canaveral02_CurrentsData.003 Deployment 2 binary ADCP current data
Canaveral03_CurrentsData. 000
Canaveral03_CurrentsData. 001
Canaveral03_CurrentsData. 002
Canaveral03_CurrentsData. 003
Canaveral03_CurrentsData.004 Deployment 3 binary ADCP current data
Canaveral04_CurrentsData. 000
Canaveral04_CurrentsData. 001
Canaveral04_CurrentsData. 002
Canaveral04_CurrentsData. 003
Canaveral04_CurrentsData.004 Deployment 4 binary ADCP current data
Binary Wave Data
Canaveral01_ProcWvsData_OOO.wvs
CanaveralO!_ProcWvsData_001.wvs Deployment 1 binary wave data
Canaveral 02_ProcWvsData_000. wvs
Canaveral02_ProcWvsData_001.wvs Deployment 2 binary wave data
Canaveral03_ProcWvsData_000 .wvs
Canaveral03_ProcWvsData_001.wvs Deployment 3 binary wave data
-------
Canaveral 04_ProcWvsData_000. wvs
Canaveral 04_ProcWvsData_001 .wvs
Canaveral04_ProcWvsData_002.wvs Deployment 4 binary wave data
-------
APPENDIX C
COMPLETE TIDAL ANALYSIS OUTPUT
PROMT TIDE
T_TIDE output includes the following columns:
tide: tidal constituent
freq: frequency (cycles/hour)
Currents
major: major axis of tidal ellipse (mm/sec)
emaj: error estimate (95% confidence limit) for major axis (mm/sec)
minor: minor axis of tidal ellipse (mm/sec)
emin: error estimate (95% confidence limit) for minor axis (mm/sec)
inc: inclination of major axis (counter clockwise from east in degrees)
einc: error estimate (95% confidence limit) for inclination (degrees)
Water Depth
amp: amplitude (meters)
amp_err: error estimate (95% confidence limit) for amplitude (meters)
phase: constituent phases (degrees relative to Greenwich)
epha: error estimate (95% confidence limit) of phase (degrees)
snr: signal to noise ratio
-------
Bottom Currents
file name: bottom_vel
date: 21-Jan-2005
nobs = 8760, ngood = 8707, record length (days) = 365.00
start time: Ol-Feb-2003
rayleigh criterion = 1.0
Greenwich phase computed with nodal corrections applied to amplitude \n and phase
relative to center time
xO= -4.19, x trend= 0
var(x)= 856.7993 var(xp)= 136.6313 var(xres)= 719.1858
percent var predicted/var original= 15.9 %
yO= 21.1, x trend= 0
var(y)= 3892.6318 var(yp)= 133.4274 var(yres)= 3757.5217
percent var predicted/var original= 3.4 %
ellipse parameters with 95%% CI estimates
tide
SSA
MSM
MM
MSF
MF
ALP1
2Q1
SIG1
Ql
RH01
*01
TAU1
BET1
*N01
CHI1
*P1
*K1
PHI1
THE1
Jl
SOI
001
UPS1
OQ2
EPS2
2N2
MU2
*N2
NU2
*M2
MKS2
LDA2
L2
*S2
freg
0.0002282
0.0013098
0.0015122
0.0028219
0.0030501
0.0343966
0.0357064
0.0359087
0.0372185
0.0374209
0.0387307
0.0389588
0.0400404
0.0402686
0.0404710
0.0415526
0.0417807
0.0420089
0.0430905
0.0432929
0.0446027
0.0448308
0.0463430
0.0759749
0.0761773
0.0774871
0.0776895
0.0789992
0.0792016
0.0805114
0.0807396
0.0818212
0.0820236
0.0833333
major
3,
5,
6,
16,
3,
1,
1,
2,
1,
1,
4,
1,
1,
3,
1,
4,
9,
2,
1,
2,
1,
1,
0,
1,
0,
1,
0,
3,
1,
18,
1,
1,
1,
3,
.304
.906
.241
.083
.315
.493
.259
.487
.916
.645
.235
.233
.237
.978
.981
.336
.214
.939
.887
.608
.755
.559
.381
.639
.994
.804
.707
.750
.362
.874
.504
.881
.433
.538
emaj
8.129
11.653
10.504
11.888
8.990
2.079
2.103
2.005
2.038
1.818
2.428
2.501
1.809
2.319
2.125
2.903
3.013
2.931
2.153
2.280
2.173
1.588
1.321
1.608
1.397
1.627
1.231
1.839
1.493
1.574
1.252
1.576
1.403
1.795
minor
0,
0,
0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-1,
0,
-0,
2,
0,
-0,
-0,
-1,
-0,
1,
-2,
-1,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
1,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-1,
.569
.124
.832
.373
.369
.556
.609
.385
.199
.987
.303
.213
.164
.136
.092
.857
.702
.612
.388
.149
.080
.402
.005
.068
.011
.454
.465
.078
.276
.112
.858
.377
.034
.212
emin
5.73
3.55
4.19
3.66
4.16
1.79
2.04
2.39
2.21
2.09
2.21
2.40
1.98
2.17
2.01
2.70
2.61
2.91
2.16
2.30
2.25
1.69
1.31
1.77
1.40
1.67
1.33
1.74
1.47
1.71
1.23
1.56
1.29
1.57
inc
170,
96,
97,
81,
109,
108,
54,
40,
49,
148,
90,
123,
51,
66,
70,
81,
68,
69,
13,
57,
90,
25,
71,
96,
15,
65,
81,
140,
146,
146,
175,
7,
116,
112,
.84
.36
.08
.81
.03
.94
.83
.08
.14
.56
.92
.74
.75
.06
.53
.33
.44
.96
.99
.47
.88
.93
.06
.00
.32
.92
.52
.97
.42
.19
.70
.63
.36
.40
einc
56.39
26.52
31.55
14.62
33.53
105.49
97.59
87.62
76.42
109.00
56.27
109.70
94.61
34.58
91.57
43.28
19.63
124.26
114.11
62.57
89.14
91.19
121.27
80.16
107.41
73.63
123.67
34.93
92.39
5.18
96.07
60.68
72.02
34.88
pha
206,
211,
282,
219,
38,
114,
103,
270,
229,
43,
316,
95,
346,
340,
281,
326,
293,
76,
18,
321,
3,
60,
234,
340,
193,
43,
221,
112,
112,
131,
336,
5,
4,
111,
.83
.93
.04
.64
.93
.06
.71
.04
.96
.07
.73
.72
.03
.07
.66
.00
.00
.58
.50
.35
.28
.47
.62
.57
.29
.33
.04
.08
.79
.33
.31
.39
.57
.78
epha
172.40
124.77
113.82
52.31
168.42
126.57
140.25
95.96
93.70
135.12
67.76
168.19
125.96
35.09
102.62
48.79
20.25
128.81
112.08
74.67
109.29
79.18
241.52
91.12
128.48
72.09
161.44
27.88
86.87
6.06
94.36
61.40
74.91
37.94
snr
0.17
0.26
0.35
1.8
0.14
0.52
0.36
1.5
0.88
0.82
3
0.24
0.47
2.9
0.87
2.2
9.3
1
0.77
1.3
0.65
0.96
0.083
1
0.51
1.2
0.33
4.2
0.83
1.4e+002
1.4
1.4
1
3.9
-------
K2 0
MSN2 0
ETA2 0
M03 0
M3 0
303 0
MK3 0
SK3 0
MN4 0
M4 0
SN4 0
MS4 0
MK4 0
S4 0
SK4 0
2MK5 0
2SK5 0
2MN6 0
M6 0
2MS6 0
2MK6 0
2SM6 0
MSK6 0
3MK7 0
M8 0
.0835615
.0848455
.0850736
.1192421
.1207671
.1220640
.1222921
.1251141
.1595106
.1610228
.1623326
.1638447
.1640729
.1666667
.1668948
.2028035
.2084474
.2400221
.2415342
.2443561
.2445843
.2471781
.2474062
.2833149
.3220456
1.
1.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
.025
.023
.653
.753
.332
.540
.305
.779
.481
.734
.294
.775
.159
.805
.288
.391
.399
.633
.667
.617
.133
.361
.381
.279
.305
1.071
1.384
1.062
0.864
0.635
0.687
0.628
0.765
0.523
0.533
0.606
0.596
0.346
0.698
0.404
0.401
0.439
0.498
0.477
0.488
0.267
0.435
0.344
0.324
0.313
-0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
-0,
0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
.553
.046
.042
.113
.149
.131
.167
.162
.081
.537
.209
.657
.085
.156
.117
.073
.044
.114
.082
.083
.033
.051
.089
.174
.077
1.21
1.40
0.93
0.63
0.74
0.56
0.63
0.71
0.52
0.63
0.51
0.59
0.41
0.61
0.45
0.44
0.38
0.42
0.42
0.46
0.27
0.39
0.37
0.34
0.32
171.
4,
45,
143,
142,
165,
76,
37,
86,
130,
102,
7,
144,
3,
50,
99,
147,
179,
167,
150,
114,
52,
106,
132,
18,
.40
.82
.37
.27
.63
.96
.57
.12
.25
.80
.08
.22
.43
.35
.29
.12
.74
.36
.31
.16
.38
.56
.34
.22
.78
98.07
98.04
110.81
66.83
109.72
84.56
131.68
70.33
93.37
95.39
132.25
104.08
114.17
55.08
116.52
94.24
71.97
50.28
46.34
44.70
121.72
83.56
80.20
117.89
85.90
89,
14,
33,
175,
160,
147,
311,
264,
88,
109,
277,
244,
219,
352,
291,
246,
149,
112,
159,
204,
74,
82,
81,
36,
244,
.78
.14
.56
.45
.42
.10
.07
.66
.68
.47
.94
.57
.30
.55
.36
.28
.92
.28
.90
.05
.01
.69
.51
.57
.03
108.24
104.61
129.70
72.96
174.74
132.16
169.69
70.82
99.29
102.40
152.35
115.87
160.82
55.13
123.54
86.09
89.54
51.60
50.74
56.16
176.42
77.05
71.59
126.54
93.21
0.92
0.55
0.38
0.76
0.27
0.62
0.24
1
0.85
1.9
0.24
1.7
0.21
1.3
0.51
0.95
0.82
1.6
1.9
1.6
0.25
0.69
1.2
0.74
0.95
total var= 4749.4311 pred var= 270.0586
percent total var predicted/var original= 5.7
-------
Surface Currents
file name: surf_vel
date: 21-Jan-2005
nobs = 8760, ngood = 8707, record length (days) = 365.00
start time: Ol-Feb-2003
rayleigh criterion = 1.0
Greenwich phase computed with nodal corrections applied to amplitude \n and phase
relative to center time
xO= 14.5, x trend= 0
var(x)= 3294.5787 var(xp)= 271.5265 var(xres)= 3023.6051
percent var predicted/var original= 8.2 %
yO= 49.1, x trend= 0
var(y)= 9107.6782 var(yp)= 86.1805 var(yres)= 9020.7478
percent var predicted/var original= 0.9 %
ellipse parameters with 95%% CI estimates
tide
SSA 0
MSM 0
MM 0
MSF 0
MF 0
ALP1 0
2Q1 0
SIG1 0
Ql 0
RH01 0
*01 0
TAU1 0
BET1 0
N01 0
CHI1 0
PI 0
Kl 0
PHI1 0
THE1 0
Jl 0
SOI 0
001 0
UPS1 0
OQ2 0
EPS2 0
2N2 0
MU2 0
*N2 0
NU2 0
*M2 0
MKS2 0
LDA2 0
L2 0
*S2 0
freg
.0002282
.0013098
.0015122
.0028219
.0030501
.0343966
.0357064
.0359087
.0372185
.0374209
.0387307
.0389588
.0400404
.0402686
.0404710
.0415526
.0417807
.0420089
.0430905
.0432929
.0446027
.0448308
.0463430
.0759749
.0761773
.0774871
.0776895
.0789992
.0792016
.0805114
.0807396
.0818212
.0820236
.0833333
major
16,
11,
14,
15,
3,
2,
0,
3,
3,
1,
9,
2,
2,
2,
3,
4,
6,
1,
2,
4,
5,
4,
1,
1,
0,
1,
2,
6,
2,
22,
1,
3,
2,
9,
.755
.708
.171
.467
.599
.146
.996
.320
.201
.898
.272
.357
.573
.421
.706
.483
.333
.731
.856
.486
.468
.286
.669
.386
.808
.301
.453
.849
.071
.153
.881
.202
.411
.283
emaj
23.123
17.506
19.217
21.016
17.239
4.390
4.121
4.700
3.824
4.275
5.764
5.326
4.280
3.804
4.623
4.607
5.223
4.567
4.194
4.591
4.999
3.656
3.257
3.239
2.730
2.522
2.559
3.833
2.950
3.934
2.154
3.090
3.281
3.513
minor
0,
0,
0,
-0,
1,
0,
-0,
-1,
-1,
-1,
0,
0,
0,
-0,
-0,
0,
1,
-0,
0,
-0,
-2,
-2,
-0,
0,
-0,
0,
-1,
1,
-0,
0,
0,
-1,
-0,
-1,
.957
.342
.203
.147
.100
.294
.675
.369
.824
.292
.590
.180
.665
.646
.903
.680
.823
.382
.927
.964
.886
.211
.137
.304
.126
.067
.509
.222
.093
.227
.257
.974
.188
.942
emin
12.62
13.34
10.55
13.44
10.77
4.01
3.72
3.76
4.31
3.61
4.94
5.01
3.92
3.63
4.57
4.90
5.37
4.18
3.82
4.15
5.01
3.68
2.94
2.68
2.49
2.80
3.27
3.29
2.40
3.76
2.43
3.26
2.76
3.22
inc
78,
53,
89,
65,
94,
88,
115,
33,
53,
59,
54,
46,
170,
157,
88,
110,
157,
127,
16,
75,
22,
75,
14,
23,
119,
138,
15,
152,
62,
155,
146,
11,
161,
169,
.67
.04
.31
.05
.05
.99
.03
.95
.40
.39
.50
.34
.02
.48
.24
.80
.89
.43
.55
.79
.32
.65
.60
.25
.55
.28
.42
.92
.69
.20
.71
.36
.67
.01
einc
35.89
59.73
43.60
49.20
57.67
113.53
119.58
103.26
113.12
119.16
35.85
124.35
135.22
115.91
84.55
73.48
79.09
114.55
107.29
74.34
87.13
83.24
103.62
122.57
132.60
126.41
103.55
32.00
118.76
8.24
90.78
85.40
83.59
25.35
pha
260,
204,
282,
240,
339,
99,
87,
104,
294,
19,
303,
352,
129,
334,
118,
222,
10,
156,
250,
126,
319,
204,
54,
350,
330,
88,
236,
126,
138,
149,
9,
161,
117,
140,
.20
.76
.72
.20
.94
.12
.60
.76
.67
.90
.23
.85
.01
.66
.98
.07
.41
.51
.49
.84
.55
.76
.37
.72
.69
.86
.48
.18
.24
.14
.19
.35
.50
.70
epha
91.32
121.83
110.87
88.59
221.43
167.10
209.34
121.02
125.38
181.99
38.56
149.45
158.54
129.93
106.26
84.33
74.05
165.59
129.17
79.00
84.54
89.13
146.11
168.89
182.30
152.64
117.55
31.28
113.40
9.55
110.44
111.73
92.10
22.99
snr
0.53
0.45
0.54
0.54
0.044
0.24
0.058
0.5
0.7
0.2
2.6
0.2
0.36
0.4
0.64
0.95
1.5
0.14
0.46
0.96
1.2
1.4
0.26
0.18
0.088
0.27
0.92
3.2
0.49
32
0.76
1.1
0.54
7
-------
K2 0
MSN2 0
ETA2 0
M03 0
M3 0
303 0
MK3 0
SK3 0
MN4 0
M4 0
SN4 0
MS4 0
MK4 0
S4 0
SK4 0
2MK5 0
*2SK5 0
2MN6 0
M6 0
2MS6 0
2MK6 0
2SM6 0
MSK6 0
3MK7 0
M8 0
.0835615
.0848455
.0850736
.1192421
.1207671
.1220640
.1222921
.1251141
.1595106
.1610228
.1623326
.1638447
.1640729
.1666667
.1668948
.2028035
.2084474
.2400221
.2415342
.2443561
.2445843
.2471781
.2474062
.2833149
.3220456
2,
2,
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2,
0,
1.
0,
1.
1.
2,
1.
0,
2,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
.443
.752
.961
.481
.153
.974
.264
.255
.638
.291
.707
.070
.014
.027
.179
.387
.399
.451
.820
.658
.480
.520
.381
.534
.451
2.604
3.156
2.292
1.645
1.649
1.725
1.514
1.888
1.093
1.565
1.292
1.220
1.079
1.616
1.131
0.867
1.268
0.760
0.906
0.767
0.660
0.781
0.649
0.612
0.498
-0,
-1.
-0,
-0,
-0,
-1.
-0,
0,
0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
0,
0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
.275
.748
.611
.739
.527
.079
.403
.132
.180
.316
.141
.541
.669
.532
.217
.150
.071
.031
.162
.090
.180
.234
.222
.073
.114
2.35
2.81
2.51
1.57
1.68
1.83
1.60
1.83
1.01
1.37
1.11
1.31
1.17
1.40
1.01
0.91
1.03
0.71
0.84
0.69
0.62
0.73
0.64
0.53
0.53
135,
31.
43,
111,
86,
120,
169,
138,
74,
42,
150,
169,
163,
5,
0,
81,
155,
135,
3,
178,
61,
2,
154,
142,
135,
.50
.05
.19
.29
.65
.03
.37
.33
.02
.55
.95
.78
.17
.35
.89
.26
.27
.62
.79
.52
.37
.95
.29
.31
.86
76.71
111.19
94.02
105.62
129.59
93.89
92.30
66.62
128.60
76.81
106.68
94.09
101.22
44.81
62.41
157.82
26.94
114.01
72.83
90.08
94.70
88.69
118.77
83.12
89.66
299,
183,
104,
265,
102,
133,
160,
314,
34,
50,
174,
190,
76,
90,
310,
339,
121,
130,
355,
233,
349,
131,
282,
80,
299,
.50
.89
.09
.55
.12
.23
.17
.33
.06
.84
.58
.06
.88
.27
.15
.98
.06
.76
.63
.80
.69
.66
.17
.50
.72
79.89
115.25
96.27
96.87
113.51
84.71
106.34
55.68
137.56
83.30
144.88
162.45
135.21
52.43
81.85
160.40
33.61
132.63
94.18
94.52
113.84
110.64
138.72
94.77
96.72
0.88
0.76
0.73
0.81
0.49
1.3
0.7
1.4
0.34
0.68
0.3
0.77
0.88
1.6
1.1
0.2
3.6
0.35
0.82
0.74
0.53
0.44
0.34
0.76
0.82
total var= 12402.257 pred var= 357.707
percent total var predicted/var original= 2.9
-------
Depth Averaged Currents
file name: avg_vel
date: 19-Jan-2005
nobs = 8760, ngood = 8707, record length (days) = 365.00
start time: Ol-Feb-2003
rayleigh criterion = 1.0
Greenwich phase computed with nodal corrections applied to amplitude \n and phase
relative to center time
xO= 7.26, x trend= 0
var(x)= 828.4887 var(xp)= 184.8524 var(xres)= 643.2663
percent var predicted/var original= 22.3 %
yO= 33, x trend= 0
var(y)= 5279.1252 var(yp)= 169.85 var(yres)= 5109.4204
percent var predicted/var original= 3.2 %
ellipse parameters with 95%% CI estimates
tide
SSA
MSM
MM
MSF
MF
ALP1
2Q1
SIG1
Ql
RH01
*01
TAU1
BET1
*N01
CHI1
*P1
*K1
PHI1
THE1
Jl
SOI
001
UPS1
*OQ2
EPS2
2N2
MU2
*N2
NU2
*M2
*MKS2
LDA2
*L2
*S2
freg
0.0002282
0.0013098
0.0015122
0.0028219
0.0030501
0.0343966
0.0357064
0.0359087
0.0372185
0.0374209
0.0387307
0.0389588
0.0400404
0.0402686
0.0404710
0.0415526
0.0417807
0.0420089
0.0430905
0.0432929
0.0446027
0.0448308
0.0463430
0.0759749
0.0761773
0.0774871
0.0776895
0.0789992
0.0792016
0.0805114
0.0807396
0.0818212
0.0820236
0.0833333
major
5,
9,
8,
17,
3,
1,
0,
2,
1,
1,
6,
1,
1,
3,
1,
6,
10,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
5,
1,
20,
1,
0,
1,
4,
.442
.550
.391
.887
.687
.590
.602
.025
.403
.126
.614
.058
.823
.576
.592
.468
.264
.885
.255
.589
.227
.646
.785
.652
.258
.962
.762
.299
.242
.654
.421
.675
.596
.097
emaj
11.472
11.915
14.345
16.007
11.936
1.931
1.533
1.899
2.009
1.392
2.737
2.196
1.900
2.123
1.800
2.818
2.908
2.078
1.810
1.609
1.860
1.208
1.459
1.104
0.829
1.060
0.824
1.122
0.981
1.232
0.844
1.028
1.107
1.118
minor
-3,
-0,
1,
-1,
1,
-0,
-0,
-1,
0,
-0,
1,
0,
-0,
-0,
-1,
-2,
-1,
-1,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
0,
0,
.587
.555
.170
.534
.252
.217
.593
.157
.400
.197
.266
.012
.777
.942
.025
.938
.280
.046
.231
.816
.177
.274
.018
.547
.012
.068
.475
.274
.105
.252
.394
.373
.376
.534
emin
7.12
6.43
5.16
6.62
4.65
1.60
1.69
1.81
1.71
1.81
1.94
1.79
1.71
1.44
1.83
2.16
1.91
2.22
1.55
1.76
1.49
1.09
1.04
1.11
0.83
0.99
0.95
1.08
1.08
1.19
0.93
0.83
1.12
1.17
inc
131,
65,
97,
74,
85,
95,
83,
113,
100,
2,
79,
97,
125,
83,
100,
85,
92,
31,
99,
169,
90,
116,
63,
53,
174,
116,
18,
151,
126,
151,
149,
170,
135,
134,
.98
.96
.38
.01
.66
.82
.74
.32
.68
.21
.17
.65
.44
.33
.39
.65
.76
.54
.83
.58
.85
.85
.27
.35
.81
.57
.94
.87
.18
.98
.85
.42
.30
.89
einc
59.59
30.78
24.44
19.60
29.28
64.64
105.00
86.22
74.12
138.90
17.83
86.20
87.13
31.31
92.59
27.56
10.50
100.53
75.88
124.68
69.26
100.12
90.80
60.99
121.10
83.91
107.85
11.54
60.66
3.31
47.51
116.11
50.41
16.73
pha
246,
214,
288,
231,
339,
77,
74,
238,
282,
207,
324,
39,
95,
337,
171,
291,
312,
323,
1,
182,
358,
290,
108,
351,
74,
156,
301,
128,
131,
146,
32,
283,
60,
115,
.07
.30
.43
.35
.48
.19
.90
.36
.74
.76
.60
.48
.94
.94
.66
.53
.50
.29
.05
.14
.75
.99
.56
.52
.04
.71
.68
.32
.40
.75
.58
.54
.57
.56
epha
161.03
103.16
120.05
53.45
194.18
104.16
200.33
96.42
119.68
111.57
23.18
163.16
110.19
42.42
133.88
37.33
15.65
97.65
117.88
88.78
125.25
172.20
129.18
47.68
192.56
91.32
112.56
13.33
63.36
3.30
49.73
134.99
44.94
16.25
snr
0.23
0.64
0.34
1.2
0.095
0.68
0.15
1.1
0.49
0.65
5.8
0.23
0.92
2.8
0.78
5.3
12
0.82
0.48
0.98
0.44
0.29
0.29
2.2
0.097
0.82
0.86
22
1.6
2.8e+002
2.8
0.43
2.1
13
-------
K2
MSN2
ETA2
M03
M3
303
MK3
*SK3
MN4
*M4
SN4
MS 4
MK4
*S4
SK4
2MK5
*2SK5
2MN6
*M6
*2MS6
2MK6
2SM6
MSK6
3MK7
M8
0.0835615
0.0848455
0.0850736
0.1192421
0.1207671
0.1220640
0.1222921
0.1251141
0.1595106
0.1610228
0.1623326
0.1638447
0.1640729
0.1666667
0.1668948
0.2028035
0.2084474
0.2400221
0.2415342
0.2443561
0.2445843
0.2471781
0.2474062
0.2833149
0.3220456
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
.746
.360
.457
.470
.504
.465
.378
.869
.492
.683
.188
.532
.350
.808
.463
.212
.236
.497
.730
.677
.173
.294
.094
.167
.194
0.790
0.765
0.733
0.542
0.555
0.498
0.566
0.559
0.413
0.463
0.327
0.393
0.347
0.457
0.431
0.371
0.479
0.423
0.364
0.382
0.283
0.354
0.271
0.224
0.248
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
0,
0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
-0,
.233
.141
.103
.008
.012
.091
.169
.492
.080
.396
.036
.077
.206
.154
.109
.032
.159
.067
.144
.186
.050
.226
.005
.095
.027
0.76
0.84
0.70
0.57
0.58
0.52
0.53
0.57
0.38
0.43
0.36
0.41
0.30
0.40
0.29
0.36
0.41
0.44
0.40
0.43
0.24
0.35
0.23
0.24
0.23
146,
148,
77,
134,
99,
121,
8,
116,
132,
171,
73,
135,
3,
173,
179,
99,
151,
168,
9,
176,
138,
0,
80,
117,
98,
.11
.11
.90
.26
.02
.57
.14
.97
.17
.22
.43
.61
.28
.64
.64
.50
.43
.01
.15
.00
.12
.10
.81
.69
.79
84.02
122.60
118.01
86.88
86.86
80.29
109.32
74.03
61.78
69.64
116.44
52.95
74.13
35.73
53.76
133.29
21.21
54.47
36.54
43.63
109.94
113.89
120.94
123.77
85.14
313,
278,
140,
205,
100,
158,
285,
295,
103,
153,
113,
115,
234,
257,
120,
328,
130,
128,
345,
210,
82,
121,
112,
59,
303,
.24
.00
.33
.48
.52
.56
.85
.80
.46
.91
.20
.70
.37
.09
.99
.64
.60
.35
.76
.23
.24
.44
.80
.31
.85
83.48
185.20
128.67
88.17
86.49
89.90
124.91
76.77
55.93
76.02
128.40
57.46
95.72
40.47
56.52
137.42
24.64
59.29
38.88
42.88
140.43
112.02
171.11
141.04
106.30
0.89
0.22
0.39
0.75
0.82
0.87
0.45
2.4
1.4
2.2
0.33
1.8
1
3.1
1.2
0.33
6.7
1.4
4
3.1
0.37
0.69
0.12
0.56
0.61
total var= 6107.6139 pred var= 354.7023
percent total var predicted/var original= 5.i
-------
Water Depth
file name: tide
date: 12-Jan-2005
nobs = 35040, ngood = 34744, record length (days) = 365.00
start time: Ol-Feb-2003
rayleigh criterion = 1.0
Greenwich phase computed with nodal corrections applied to amplitude \n and phase
relative to center time
xO= 13.6, x trend= 0
var(x)= 0.25378 var(xp)= 0.14498 var(xres)= 0.10869
percent var predicted/var original= 57.1 %
tidal amplitude and phase with 95% CI estimates
tide
*SSA
MSM
MM
MSF
MF
ALP1
2Q1
SIG1
Ql
RH01
*01
TAU1
BET1
N01
CHI1
*P1
*K1
PHI1
THE1
Jl
SOI
001
UPS1
OQ2
EPS2
2N2
MU2
*N2
NU2
*M2
*MKS2
LDA2
L2
*S2
*K2
MSN2
ETA2
M03
M3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
freg
.0002282
.0013098
.0015122
.0028219
.0030501
.0343966
.0357064
.0359087
.0372185
.0374209
.0387307
.0389588
.0400404
.0402686
.0404710
.0415526
.0417807
.0420089
.0430905
.0432929
.0446027
.0448308
.0463430
.0759749
.0761773
.0774871
.0776895
.0789992
.0792016
.0805114
.0807396
.0818212
.0820236
.0833333
.0835615
.0848455
.0850736
.1192421
.1207671
amp amp err
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
.1493
.0104
.0271
.0358
.0225
.0041
.0026
.0113
.0191
.0026
.0691
.0092
.0059
.0078
.0040
.0579
.1251
.0098
.0159
.0154
.0033
.0102
.0055
.0101
.0070
.0187
.0105
.1200
.0099
.4815
.0363
.0064
.0153
.0601
.0235
.0052
.0061
.0060
.0045
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
,092
,065
,077
,070
,077
,014
,015
,017
,019
,015
,023
,017
,014
,012
,016
,023
,023
,017
,018
,018
,015
,012
,012
,017
,016
,021
,017
,020
,018
,020
,016
,015
,017
,019
,014
,014
,012
,009
,008
pha
89.
207.
21.
105.
255.
13.
337.
54.
127.
68.
146.
224.
271.
102.
22.
105.
129.
27.
15.
165.
2.
138.
337.
229.
164.
204.
237.
225.
198.
241.
117.
253.
218.
239.
266.
227.
259.
53.
253.
pha err
54
64
19
20
20
24
90
94
70
23
06
58
21
65
11
29
83
36
38
71
70
91
80
68
20
67
62
97
44
13
76
02
52
79
76
29
81
60
61
38,
219,
140,
147,
198,
192,
221,
103,
57,
223,
17,
142,
170,
132,
182,
23,
10,
136,
75,
87,
207,
77,
157,
116,
137,
77,
100,
9,
123,
2,
24,
152,
73,
17,
40,
156,
136,
94,
137,
.41
.61
.57
.21
.84
.46
.06
.67
.77
.32
.20
.97
.37
.95
.67
.81
.84
.95
.20
.99
.40
.57
.28
.06
.49
.05
.52
.59
.60
.26
.98
.23
.99
.98
.80
.57
.31
.03
.26
snr
2.6
0.025
0.12
0.26
0.086
0.09
0.031
0.42
0.97
0.032
9
0.3
0.18
0.4
0.066
6.2
30
0.35
0.78
0.77
0.049
0.71
0.21
0.33
0.19
0.76
0.38
34
0.29
6e+002
4.8
0.18
0.79
9.8
2.8
0.14
0.24
0.5
0.35
-------
303
MK3
SK3
MN4
M4
SN4
MS 4
MK4
S4
SK4
2MK5
2SK5
2MN6
M6
2MS6
2MK6
2SM6
MSK6
3MK7
M8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.1220640
.1222921
.1251141
.1595106
.1610228
.1623326
.1638447
.1640729
.1666667
.1668948
.2028035
.2084474
.2400221
.2415342
.2443561
.2445843
.2471781
.2474062
.2833149
.3220456
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
.0043
.0029
.0065
.0005
.0026
.0007
.0054
.0039
.0017
.0038
.0048
.0066
.0015
.0068
.0062
.0051
.0014
.0042
.0024
.0013
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
,007
,007
,009
,006
,007
,005
,006
,007
,006
,005
,007
,007
,005
,007
,006
,005
,005
,006
,005
,004
20.
309.
74.
173.
330.
116.
179.
182.
147.
17.
109.
149.
224.
289.
297.
188.
119.
81.
192.
235.
26
87
78
20
39
70
33
01
58
31
13
28
12
43
48
92
58
58
25
17
118,
136,
84,
258,
162,
249,
92,
97,
193,
99,
98,
73,
188,
55,
67,
61.
199,
80,
117,
170,
.72
.15
.79
.97
.85
.17
.14
.87
.29
.41
.67
.21
.26
.06
.17
.04
.27
.49
.17
.68
0.38
0.17
0.53
0.0075
0.14
0.019
0.76
0.36
0.092
0.51
0.5
0.9
0.095
1
1.1
0.9
0.092
0.53
0.27
0.11
------- |