&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
                BOSC Review (Dec. 2007) of
                Computational Toxicology
                Research Program
                Summary of Review Comments and ORD Response
               OO 0 I 1 <
                1 000 U
               00 00
                 oo
                0110
               DO 001
                   STATES EN VI RON MEN
                   . -  -    . ,
  TECTiON AGENCY
    • • o o •oo • o
1 0 1 l  0 0 0 0 I I O O I I
 iQll
 ' 00
 0 00011 OMOO
 1000110 1110111
.00  OO 00 100 00

COMPUTATIONAL

  TOXICOLOGY
  Office of Research and Development
  National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
FPA
                               Subcommittee
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
  Dr. George Daston (Chair)
  Dr. James Clark
  Dr. Richard DiGiulio
  Dr. Muiz Mumtaz
  Dr. John Quackenbush
  Dr. Cynthia Stokes
Office of Research and Development
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                           Goals of the Review
  To provide NCCT with advice on the progress the Center has made, in the
  past year, in fulfilling its mission and strategic goals.
  Particularly, the Subcommittee addressed six charge questions for five
  NCCT activities (ToxCast, Informatics Technology/Information
  Management (IT/IM) activities, Virtual  Liver, Developmental Systems
  Biology, and Arsenic BBDR).
Office of Research and Development
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                   Summary of Charge Questions
  Does the scope and involvement of expertise in the project reflect activities
  consistent with the function of a Center?
  Are the goals and milestones suitably described, ambitious, and
  innovative?
  Are there significant gaps in the approach that can be pointed out at this
  point in the evolution of the project?
  Does the work offer to significantly improve environmental health impacts
  and is the path toward regulatory acceptance and utilization apparent?
  Have appropriate data management and analysis tools been incorporated
  into the project?
  How would you assess the outreach to other groups in executing the
  projects?
Office of Research and Development
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
FPA
cm                        Overall Finding
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
       "The Subcommittee was very pleased with the progress that the Center
       has made towards its goals. NCCT first became operational in February
       2005; during the 2.5 years between its establishment and this review,
       NCCT has made substantial  progress in establishing priorities and goals;
       making connections within and outside EPA to leverage the staffs
       considerable modeling expertise; expanding its capabilities in informatics;
       and making significant contribu-tions to research and decision-making
       throughout the Agency. We are pleased to see that informatics tools
       developed by the Center already are being used by program offices, and
       that the program offices are taking advantage of the expertise of the
       Center in developing critical elements for risk assessment..."
Office of Research and Development
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
&EPA
                Summary of Specific Recommendations
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
               Stakeholder identification and involvement
               Discussions with risk assessment practitioners
               Develop effective ways of dealing with wealth of data
               Look for relevance of ToxCast™ beyond toxicity
               prioritization including exposure paths and ecology
               Detailed milestones and time table
               Detailed project plans for v-tissues
   Office of Research and Development
   National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                       Summary of Responses
  Stakeholders, risk assessment practitioners, and outreach
   - Identify and invite key stakeholders to next BOSC review
   - Regular discussions with NCEA and others are underway
   - Expansion of Communities of Practice
   - Project team for v-Liver project includes risk assessors
   - v-tissues workshop with European Union in April 2009 at EPA
   -ToxCast™ data summit in May 2009 at EPA
     • Provide forum for external scientists to discuss with EPA alternatives
       for deriving predictive signatures from ToxCast™
Office of Research and Development
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
v>EPA
                        Responses Continued
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
     Effective ways for dealing with data
      - Extensive suite of interactive databases is under development and
        prioritization of data input is in consultation with program offices and
        others
         • ACToR, (   ; : ;       ,;         ) is the global repository of data
          that is relevant to environmental chemicals
         • ToxRefDB, in vivo toxicology data on chemicals in the ToxCast™
          program
         • ToxMiner, a compilation of statistical tools capable of analyzing
          relationships between ToxCast™ and ToxRefDB data, and
          performing predictive signatures
         • the ToxCast™ chemical registry, used to track nominations for
          ToxCastTM screening, to track sample identity and sample QC, and
          fto link actual samples to ToxCast™ data
         • DSSTox, chemical structure layer added to the  data sets
   Office of Research and Development
   National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                     Responses Continued
  Relevance of ToxCast™ beyond toxicity prioritization including exposure
  paths and ecology
   - Expanded workgroups to address exposure pathways through
    "ExpoCast" - exposure relevance to toxicity signature predictions
   - Partnering with NHEERL and NERL for HTS for ecological species
    other than human
   -Testing of Pharmaceuticals in Phase II of ToxCast™ to compare results
    to known human toxicities
Office of Research and Development
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                       Responses Continued
  Detailed milestones for projects and more detailed project plans for v-
  tissues
   -Milestones have been put in place for ToxCast™-v-tissues, and IT/IM
    and are included in an appendix to response memo
   - Short-term and long-term goals for v-Liver have been identified and are
    in response memo
   - Detailed project plan for v-embryo developed and in memo.
   - Milestones for BBDR for Arsenic have not been developed due to
    significant change in the plans for this work which has been described
    in memo
      • The lead and partner laboratory, NHEERL after considerable peer
       review and consultation with program office no longer are
       concentrating on this project
      • NCCT efforts being redirected to v-tissues and related projects
Office of Research and Development                                                  + «
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------

United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                                Next Steps
  NCCT is developing the next ORD Computational Toxicology Research
  Implementation Plan
   -Will cover 2009-2012
   -Will reflect recommendation from most recent BOSC review
   -Will be presented to BOSC Computational Sub-committee for review in
    2009 (exact date TBD)
   -Milestones and plans developed as result of these recommendations
    will be incorporated
Office of Research and Development                                                  + A
National Center for Computational Toxicology

-------