Section 319
NONPOINT SOURCF PROE1AM SUCCESS STORY
Conservation Tillage Reduces Surface Erosion from Agriculture Activities
\A/citprhnH\/ Imnrnx/prl Excess sediment from unpaved road surfaces and agriculture
'"""• ' r '"'""" and construction activities impaired Days Creek. As a
result, an 11-mile reach of Days Creek was added to the state's 2006 Clean Water Act
(CWA) section 303(d) list of impaired waters for siltation. The Arkansas Natural Resources
Commission (ANRC) took action to address siltation caused by erosion of agricultural
fields during storm events. Landowners and the Conservation District responded by
implementing several agricultural best management practices (BMPs) that reduced siltation
and restored water quality. Days Creek now supports its aquatic life designated use, and
the 11-mile reach of the creek was removed from the state's CWA section 303(d) list of
impaired waters in 2008.
Problem
Days Creek, a tributary to the Sulphur River, flows
through Miller County in southwestern Arkansas.
Monitoring data collected from 2001 to 2005 show
elevated turbidity levels. An Arkansas Department
of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) assessment found
that an 11-mile segment of Days Creek did not
support its aquatic life designated use because of
siltation/turbidity from surface erosion. Therefore,
in 2006 Days Creek was added to the state's CWA
section 303(d) list of impaired waters for siltation/
turbidity.
The state standard requires that "suspended solids
added to surface waters by artificial sources shall
not interfere with the behavior, reproduction, physi-
cal habitat or other factor related to the survival and
propagation of aquatic or semi-aquatic or terrestrial
wildlife." ADEQ found that a number of sources
contribute to siltation problems in the Days Creek
watershed, including in-stream erosion and erosion
from unpaved road surfaces and agriculture and
construction activities (Figure 1).
Project Highlights
In 2004 the Miller County Conservation District,
with funding assistance from ANRC, purchased
a no-till drill, which allows farmers to plant seeds
directly into the previous year's crop residue
without tilling the soil (Figure 2). The crop residue
protects the soil and lessens the opportunity for
erosion. Many farmers took advantage of the oppor-
tunity to use the no-till drill-by June 2008 it had Figure ZA ™-tlN drlllcan be used to reduce SO1' eroslon
from agriculture activities.
Figure 1. As seen in this photo, conventional tillage leaves
soil unprotected, often leading to erosion during storm
events.
-------
been rented 64 times. In addition to incorporating
no-till into their farming practices, multiple land-
owners implemented other BMPs on 1,464 acres,
including conservation cover and cover crops.
Results
ANRC successfully addressed erosion from agri-
cultural sources through cost effective targeting
of CWA section 319 funds. Thanks to landowners'
efforts to conserve topsoil and prevent erosion
by using BMPs, Days Creek meets its aquatic life
designated use. Specifically, the landowners' use
of the no-till drill contributed greatly to restoring the
water quality.
Monitoring data show a 42 percent decrease in
turbidity between 2004 and 2007 (Figure 3). On the
basis of these data, the 11-mile segment of Days
Creek was removed from the state's CWA section
303(d) list of impaired waters in 2008.
Partners and Funding
The following groups helped to restore Days Creek:
landowners living in the Miller County Conservation
District, Miller County Conservation District staff,
Arkansas Natural Resources Commission and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The Miller County Conservation District used
$12,120 in CWA section 319 funds (made available
through the ANRC) to purchase the no-till drill for
BMP implementation. Local landowners provided
approximately $25,250 of in-kind match for using
the drill.
5-year Trend for Turbidity in Days Creek (RED0004a)
?nn
180
160
i An
i9n
I — 100
an
fin
40
20
»
•
• * •
•
*
•
•
*
*
*
* '* * **• •• ** * *••*•* •» *••»• *«
------- |