NATIONAL
 ESTUARY
 PROGRAM
COMMUNITY SUPPORT  FOR A  REAL  ESTATE  TRANSFER TAX
Since 1 993, the Peconic Estuary Program has conducted extensive public involvement and outreach initiatives in its watershed. The outcome of this work
has been strong partnerships with organizations and individuals in their community. Community-based support on Long Island's East End, including the Pe-
conic Estuary System watershed, was crucial to establishing a two percent (2%) real estate transfer tax to support land conservation and related purposes,
including historic preservation. Fortunately, the Peconic Estuary community has had a long history of public involvement and partnership building - essential
to the success of the transfer tax program. Real estate transfer taxes are assessments made by states (or local governments) on real estate transfers based
on the sale price of the property and, on the East End, paid by the buyer of the property.
THE NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM IN ACTION
                                                                                Peconic  Estuary Program

                                                                              Implementing the real estate
                                                                              transfer tax required three major
                                                                              steps:

                                                                              • The New York Legislature had
                                                                              to pass  enabling  legislation,
                                                                              though some interests at the
                                                                              state and national levels effec-
                                                                              tively delayed  passage of the
                                                                              enabling  legislation  for more
                                                                              than a decade.

                                                                              •  A  Community  Preservation
                                                                              Plan was  required from each
                                                                              participating town, identifying
                                                                              priority parcels  for acquisition
                                                                              and easements.
                                                                                        • Each town needed to pass a
                                                                                        local referendum to authorize
                                                                                        the tax—again, some interests
                                                                                        spent an estimated $300,000 to
                                                                                        fight passage.

                                                                                        In 1998, the New York Legisla-
                                                                                        ture voted to allow Long Island's
                                                                                        five East End towns to hold ref-
                                                                                        erenda on  establishing a  real
                                                                                        estate transfer tax. Despite lob-
                                                                                        byist efforts to defeat the refer-
                                                                                        enda, all of the towns gained
                                                                                        voter approval, passing with at
                                                                                        least a 60% majority.

                                                                                        The  success was secured by
                                                                                        strategic public outreach, with
                                                                                        messages supported by research
 EFFECTIVE
                   EFFICIENT
ADAPTIVE
COLLABORATIVE

-------
                                provided by the Peconic Estuary
                                Program (PEP) and other stake-
                                holders.  A  large  community-
                                based coalition including  the
                                Committee for  the  East  End
                                Community  Preservation  Fund,
                                the five  East  End  towns,  local
                                businesses, realtors,  builders,
                                and  citizens presented a com-
                                pelling case to voters that pre-
                                serving open space would pro-
                                tect     estuarine    resources,
                                groundwater   quality, and  the
                                character of Long  Island's East
                                End. Studies funded or contract-
                                ed by the PEP that helped sup-
                                port the need for increased pro-
                                tection  included an  economic
                                valuation of the Estuary and its
                                impact  on the local economy,
                                detailed  information  on current
                                land  use,  and  projections of
                                development   and   population
                                trends. The 2% real estate trans-
                                fer  Tax has raised  more  than
                                $526 million through  September
                                2008 and is the most successful
land protection program on Long
Island. The sunset date for col-
lecting the transfer tax has been
extended and  is now in place
through 2030.

While many critical  landscapes
have been protected with funds
from the 2% real estate transfer
tax and other  sources, current
land acquisition  funding  is  not
sufficient to keep up with devel-
opment rates. Fortunately, large
amounts of land can be protect-
ed  through  means  other than
land acquisition; for  example:
clearing restrictions, clustering
requirements, rezoning, overlay
districts,  easements,  purchase
of development rights, and over-
all better land use practices.  It is
estimated  that the implementa-
tion of clearing restrictions and
clustering  requirements  would
protect an additional 3,491 acres
in the  Peconic  watershed;  ac-
quiring an equivalent amount of
land would  cost an  estimated
$382 million.

Visit www.peconicestuary.org
to learn  more  about  this and
other PEP efforts.

EPA's  National Estuary Program
(NEP) is a unique and successful
coastal watershed-based program
established in  1987  under the
Clean  Water Act Amendments.
The NEP involves the public and
collaborates with partners to pro-
tect, restore, and maintain the wa-
ter quality and ecological integrity
of 28 estuaries of national signifi-
cance located in  18 coastal states
and Puerto Rico.

For more information about the
NEP go to  www.epa.gov/owow/
estuaries.
The NEP: Implementing the Clean Water Act in ways that are Effective, Efficient, Adaptive, and Collaborative.
                                                                            EPA-842F09001

-------