U.S. EPA REGION 6 EFFLUENT TOXICITY TESTING
PROGRAM: EVALUATION OF RESULTS
Philip A. Crocker1, Terry A. Hollister2, Abel Euresti2
and David Neleigh1
1Technical Section
Water Quality Management Branch
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
2Inorganics Section
Houston Branch
Environmental Services Division
6608 Hornwood Drive
Houston, TX 77074
November 1989
-------
Table of Contents
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION 1
Background 1
Purpose and Objectives 2
METHODS AND MATERIALS 2
Selection of Facilities 2
Sample Collection, Shipping and Storage 2
Toxicity Testing Procedures 3
Data Compilation and Evaluation 5
Quality Assurance 7
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION,
Spreadsheet of Effluent Toxicity Results 8
Comparative Sensitivity of Test Methods 8
Comparative Toxicity of Industrial and Municipal Discharges... 9
Potential Effects of Discharges on Receiving Waters 10
CONCLUSIONS 11
RECOMMENDATIONS 12
LITERATURE CITED 14
FIGURES 15
TABLES 22
APPENDICES 27
-------
FIGURES
Figure 1. Relative Sensitivity of Daphnia, Fathead minnow and
Algal Tests 16
Figure 2. Relative Sensitivity of Daphnia and Fathead Minnow
Tests 17
Figure 3. Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities
to Daphnia pulex 18
Figure 4. Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities
to the Fathead Minnow 19
Figure 5. Relative Toxicity of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants
to Daphnia, Fathead Minnow and Alga 20
Figure 6. Percentage of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant
Effluents Tested Where Substances Other than Chlorine
May be Influencing Toxicity 21
TABLES
Table 1. List of Water Bodies in Region 6 Which Have the
For Instream Toxicity 23
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: U.S. EPA Region 6 Effluent Toxicity Data 26
APPENDIX B: Relative Sensitivity of Effluent Toxicity Tests 67
B.I: 48 h Daphnia pulex, 8 d Fathead minnow and 96 h algal
Tests 68
B. 2: 48 h Daphnia pulex and 8 d Fathead Minnow Tests 69
APPENDIX C: Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Municipal
Discharges 70
C.I
C.2
C.3
C.4
C.5
C.6
Plastics Materials and Resins (SIC Code 2821) 71
Industrial Organic Chemicals (SIC Code 2869) 72
Petroleum Refining (SIC Code 2911) 73
Plating and Polishing (SIC Code 3471) 74
Municipal Sevage treatment Plants (SIC Code 4952) 75
Federal Facilities (SIC Code 9711) 76
-------
Acknowledgements
The assistance of Delia Oteiza, of the Environmental Services Division
(ESD), Facilities Compliance Section, whom coordinated inspections, is
much appreciated. We are grateful to James Olander, of the Enforcement
Branch, whom developed inspection lists and included the facilities
which we considered to be of high priority. We thank the ESD Facilities
Compliance and Field Activities staff who collected samples during
inspections. The efforts of Carl Young, of the ESD Environmental
Analysis Section, and Glen Bingham, of the Permits Branch, in retrieving
and interpreting STORET and PCS data, respectively, were appreciated.
We thank Scott Wilson and Jane Watson of the Permits Branch who provided
stream flow data received from the states. We are grateful to Barbara
Schrodt of the Construction Grants Branch for producing the pie charts
and the report cover. Additionally, we acknowledge the valuable reviews
of this report by Robert Vickery, Robert Elliott, Michael Bastian,
Willie Lane, and Bill Peltier (ESD, Region 4).
111
-------
INTRODUCTION
Background
Although the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (EPA)
Laboratory has had an effluent toxicity testing program for over 10
years, the emphasis was increased in Fiscal Year (FY) 1984 with regard
to both types and numbers of tests conducted. Initially, acute testing
with Daphnia and mysid shrimp served to complement the EPA "second
round" permitting approach effective during FY 1982-87, at which time
effluent toxicity screening with those species was required for most
major industrial permittees. This initiated permittees on the whole
effluent toxicity testing concept, and familiarized them with the
methodology and data interpretation. Along with the self-monitoring
data, the EPA Region 6 Laboratory results served to establish an
effluent toxicity database. Many data were also entered into EPA's
national database, the Complex Effluent Toxicity Testing Information
System (CETIS). As the capability of the Regional Laboratory improved
and testing methods became more sophisticated, the purposes of the
program diversified. Starting FY 1985-86, standard short-term chronic
tests were conducted in conjunction with Daphnia tests to address inter-
species differences in sensitivity. The chronic methods included 8 d
fathead minnow, and to a limited extent, 7 d Ceriodaphnia, and 96 h
alga (Selenastrum capricornutum) tests. Also, during this period, an
important purpose of the testing was to screen facilities to determine
the need for water quality based control measures.
In FY 1987, the Region developed a "third round" permitting policy to
be implemented during FY 1988-93, which included toxicity testing
requirements for all major NPDES permittees. Since initiation of this
policy, the need for the Region to screen facilities prior to permit
renewal has diminished. However, the need to assess the sensitivity and
compare the newly developed fresh and salt water testing methodologies
was considered important. The tests were utilized in an effluent
testing program and in numerous water quality-related special studies.
Additionally, there was a continued need to establish an effluent
toxicity database for discharges in the Region, particularly those which
could adversely affect receiving waters. Data were provided to the
states and, through inspection reports, the permittees also became aware
of the toxicity of their discharges.
An ancillary function, not initially envisioned, developed from the
Clean Water Act amendments of 1987. Under Section 304(1), the states
and/or EPA are required to list water bodies which are known to be, or
are suspected of being, impaired by toxic pollutants. As part of this
process, the states are required to evaluate available water quality as
well as effluent chemical and toxicity data. The Section 304(1)
activities are viewed as an agency priority, and the needs of the states
will play an important role in the future of the effluent testing
program, particularly with regard to identifying toxic discharges and
shifting more to special studies to evaluate toxicity of water bodies,
instead of effluents alone.
-------
-2-
Purpose and Objectives
The purpose of this report was to compile and evaluate whole effluent
toxicity testing data generated by the EPA Regional Laboratory. The
specific objectives are identified as follows:
1. Compile and present all effluent toxicity data collected from FY 1984
through mid-FY 1988. A spreadsheet was developed which includes
toxicity data, plus additional information and data on the facilities,
receiving waters and effluent chemical characteristics.
2. Compare relative sensitivity of several standard test organisms and
methods, including 24-48 h Daphnia pulex acute test, 8 d fathead minnow
(Pimephales promelas) embryo/larval survival and teratogenicity
(chronic) test and the 96 h algal (Selenastrum capricornutum) chronic
growth test.
3. Evaluate and compare effluent toxicity for various facility types
(Standard Industrial Classifications=SIC Codes), including: municipal
sewage treatment plants (SIC Code 4952); Plastics Materials and Resins
(2821) ; Industrial Organic Chemicals (2869) ; Petroleum Refining (2911) ;
Plating and Polishing (3471); and Federal Facilities (9711).
4. Evaluate where receiving waters could be affected by whole effluent
toxicity, based on available instream dilution.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Selection of Facilities
An average of about 80 facilities were selected per year for effluent
toxicity testing during the period FY 1984-88. About two-thirds of the
facilities were selected by the Water Quality Management Branch. These
facilities were selected primarily on the basis of having the potential
to affect the receiving waters (dilution ratio <. 100:1) , or because they
discharged to water bodies with known or suspected water quality
problems. The Permits Branch selected the remaining one-third of the
facilities. They were selected on the basis of having expiring NPDES
permits, such that toxicity data could be considered prior to permit
reissuance.
Sample Collection. Shipping and Storage
Single grab samples were collected from process wastewater discharges
by compliance inspectors during facility inspections. Samples were
placed in coolers, iced, and shipped to the Regional Laboratory through
an overnight courier service. Standard chain of custody procedures
(U.S. EPA 1978) were followed in processing of samples. Samples were
stored in a refrigerator at 4 C until test initiation. Testing was
initiated within 36 h of sample collection.
The decision to collect grab samples was based on resource contraints.
Grab samples provide a measure of instantaneous toxicity and spikes are
not masked by dilution. They may yield representative results if the
-------
-3-
wastewater treatment system has a long (>14 d) retention time.
Composite samples integrate toxicity spikes and may be more
representative of average conditions, and may provide more
representative results when the retention time is short (<14 d) (U.S.
EPA 1985a). From this rationale, it may be more appropriate to consider
the data as screening results which are most representative for
facilities haveing longer retention times.
Toxicity Testing Procedures
Culture of all test organsims and toxicity testing was conducted at
the Regional Laboratory, Houston, Texas. Culture and testing
methodology is presented in U.S. EPA 1985a; 1985b; and 1988. The test
procedures are summarized below.
Species
Test Type
(Duration)
Test
Endpoints
Test Container
(Test Volume)
Freshwater
Daphnia pulex
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Acute (48h)
Chronic (7d)
Fathead minnow Chronic (8d)
(Pimephales promelas)
Alga Chronic (96h)
(Selenastrum capricornuturo)
Saltwater
Mysid Shrimp Acute (48h)
(Mysidopsis bahia or
M. almyra)
Sheepshead Minnow Chronic (8d)
(Cyprinodon variegatus)
Survival
Survival;
Reproduct ion
50 ml glass
(50 ml)
50 ml glass
(15 ml)
Survival; 400 ml plastic
Teratogenicity (250 ml)
Cell Growth
Survival
20x150 mm glass
(25 ml)
400 ml plastic
(250 ml)
Survival; 400 ml plastic
Teratogenicity (250 ml)
During FY 1984-85, in the majority of cases, single species tests were
run on effluent samples. Testing with multiple (two or three species)
was initiated during FY 1986 and continued through 1988, for the purpose
of reducing uncertainty related to species sensitivity. The high level
of resources required for culturing mysids and testing Ceriodaphnia
resulted in limited use of those test organisms during FY 1986-88.
Generally because of resource limitations only single test species were
used in testing marine effluents. Usually these consisted of the mysid
acute test (through FY 1985) or the sheepshead minnow chronic (FY 1986-
88) .
-------
-4-
To better evaluate potential toxicity due to total residual chlorine
(TRC), chlorinated effluent samples were tested "as is" as well as
following dechlorination with sodium thiosulfate. The dechlorination
procedure consisted of addition of 1.0 ml of a 100 mg/1 sodium
thiosulfate (Na2S2O3 - 5H2O) solution per liter of sample. This procedure
is recommended for dechlorination of wastewater samples prior to BOD
analysis (APHA 1980). Following this procedure, samples were reanalyzed
to verify that TRC was nondetectable.
For the most part, a dilution factor of 0.5 was used in diluting
effluent samples for testing, which resulted in effluent concentrations
of 100%, 50%, 25%, 12% and 6%. This scheme was occasionally modified
to accommodate highly toxic efflents. In all tests, except for the
algal test, culture water was used as the performance control, and as
the diluent. The culture water consisted of dechlorinated, carbon
filtered City of Houston tap water. Marine tests incorporated the same
water, supplemented with sea salts (Hawaiian Marine Mix ) . The chemical
makeup of the freshwater most closely resembled moderately hard water
(described in U.S. EPA 1985a), although alkalinity was slightly lower.
The algal culture medium did not include the complexing agent EDTA.
The approximate composition of the control/dilution water is presented
below.
pH Alkalinity Hardness Conductivity Salinity
mg/1 as CaCO3 UMHO/cm o/oo
Freshwater 8.0 45 85 400 0
Algal Culture 7.3 4 14 100 0
Medium (Freshwater)
Saltwater 8.3 37,000 20
A primary advantage in using a standard water source, as was done in
this study, is that it makes results more comparable for different
effluents, categories of facilities, and collection times. A
disadvantage is that this does not take into account the site-specific
chemical characteristics of receiving waters, which could influence
instream effects. Resources were not available to collect ambient water
samples above the discharge, for use as control/dilution water.
In all cases the type of test species used—fresh or salt water—was
dictated by the effluent salinity, i.e., for effluents <5 o/oo,
freshwater organisms were used, and at >. 5 o/oo, saltwater organisms
were used. For brackish samples with salinities of 3-5 o/oo, "salinity
controls" were included to determine the effects of salinity on the test
organisms. This treatment involved exposing test organisms to culture
water to which sea salts had been added, to achieve the same salinity
as the effluent sample. The approach to select the test organisms based
-------
-5-
on effluent rather than receiving water salinity is adequate for
screening, as well as for consistency and quality control. It should
be noted that preliminary information, from EPA Region 4 and the
Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, suggests that freshwater test
organisms serve as viable surrogates to marine species and therefore can
be used in assessing impacts to marine receiving waters (Bill Peltier,
Personal Communication).
For the majority of tests, conductivity, salinity, hardness,
alkalinity, pH, DO, and temperature were measured initially. If
mortality occurred during the test, then DO was measured every 24 h
thereafter. Test temperatures were maintained at 24+1 C. During FY
1984-86, if no significant mortality (i.e., > 10% mortality in 100%
effluent) occurred in acute tests during the first 24 h, the test was
terminated. Because it was recognized that acute effects could occur
after longer exposures, starting in FY 1986 acute tests were continued
to 48 h, regardless of effect. Mortality as well as non-lethal
endpoints (if applicable) were monitored every 24 h. Acute LC50 and
chronic EC50 values were calculated using either trimmed Spearman-Karber
(pre-April 1987) or Probit (April 1987-88) procedures (U.S. EPA 1985a) .
Significance of survival or reproduction in given treatments was
analyzed using Dunnett's Test and ANOVA at P=0.95 (U.S. EPA 1985b) .
Ninety-five percent confidence intervals around the LC/EC50 values were
calculated if possible.
Data Compilation and Evaluation
All data generated from FY 1984 through mid-1988 were compiled in a
LOTUS 1-2-3 spreadsheet. Effluent toxicity and other data and
information entered into the spreadsheet included: NPDES number, outfall
number, SIC code, location, receiving water name, stream flows,
discharge flows, instream waste concentration, sample collection date,
effluent physical/chemical characteristics, test organism, test length,
LC50, mortality in 100% effluent, Lowest Observed/No Observed Effect
Concentrations (LOEC/NOEC), comments, and potential for instream
effects. A description of the elements, and the spreadsheet are
contained in Appendix A.
Relative toxicity comparisons were made using several test methods for
the following municipal and industrial facility types: Municipal Sewage
Treatment Plants (SIC Code 4952) ; Plastics Materials and Resins (2821) ;
Industrial Organic Chemicals (2869) ; Petroleum Refining (2911) ; Plating
and Polishing (3471); and Federal Facilities (9711).
Relative toxicity was defined in terms of the commonly applied 0.5
dilution factor, as shown on the following page.
-------
-6-
Terra Definition
Nontoxic No significant effect in 100% effluent
Low Toxicity Significant mortality in 100% effluent;
LC50 or EC50=100% to 50% effluent
Medium Toxicity LC50 or EC50=50% to 25% effluent
High Toxicity LC50 < 25% effluent
These are not standard measures of toxicity, however, they are useful
for purposes of grouping and assessing data. The measures may not have
a direct bearing on potential water quality effects and are used only
for comparisons between SIC categories. Additional "side-by-side"
comparisons of the sensitivity of Daphnia. fathead minnow and algal
tests were also made, primarily using LC50 or EC50 as the basis for
ranking.
Potential for receiving water effects was evaluated by considering
instream waste concentration (IWC), along with the degree of toxicity.
IWC is the estimated percent effluent dilution in the receiving water
after mixing, calculated using the following equation:
Qe x 100
IWC(%) = Qe + Qs,
where Qe and Qs are average pipe flow and critical stream flow rates,
respectively. The following decision criteria, from the Technical
Support Document (U.S. EPA 1985c), and from the states' implementation
procedures or policy, were used to assess potential receiving water
effects:
-Potential for instream acute effects if IWC>LC1, where LC1=0.3 x
LC50.
-Potential for instream chronic effects if IWC>NOEL.
-The state of Texas draft water quality standards implementation
procedures incorporated the following assumptions:
-Estuaries have a 61 m (200 ft.) mixing zone with an IWC of
8% effluent at which chronic toxicity is evaluated;
-Lakes have a 30 m (100 ft.) mixing zone with an IWC of 16%
effluent at which chronic toxicity is evaluated; and
-The Houston Ship Channel has an IWC of 30% effluent at which
acute toxicity is evaluated.
-------
-7-
-The state of Louisiana has requested that a low flow value of
111,000 cfs be used for the Mississippi River.
-In some cases best professional judgement was used in assessing
potential effects in "no flow" situations (e.g., lakes), or where
stream and/or pipe flow data or mixing zone procedures were not
available.
Flow data were obtained primarily from the Permits Branch and
consisted of either 7Q2 or 7Q10, depending on the applicable state water
quality standards. These data were received from the states for
expiring NPDES permits. Stream flow data for other (non-expiring)
permittees was developed by Permits Branch using available information
including published reports containing low flows, USGS data, from
consultation with the states, and through the STORET Industrial
Facilities Discharge (IFD) File. The IFD file incorporates industrial
and municipal facility names, NPDES numbers, receiving water reach
numbers, reach names, locations, and Gage File data. The STORET Gage
File calculates stream flow for receiving waters of interest using the
Velz-Gumbel Graphical Technique (W.E. Gates & Associates, Inc. 1982).
Quality Assurance
This study followed QA/QC procedures and data quality objectives
presented in "FY 1987 Effluent Toxicity Testing Project Plan," developed
by the Water Quality Management Branch. In addition, a QA/QC plan
outlining calibration and standardization of instrumentation, test
procedures, and test organism maintenance is on file with the Houston
Laboratory's Quality Assurance Office. The Regional Laboratory followed
standard operating procedures (SOP's) adapted from acute and chronic
testing manuals. These SOP's were consistently followed by the same two
laboratory personnel throughout the study period.
SOP's included reference toxicant tests conducted monthly for each
test organism using copper sulfate (CuSO4) . Control charts were
maintained for each reference toxicant-organism combination and
successive toxicity values (i.e., LC50 or EC50) were plotted to
determine any variation in sensitivity of the test organisms.
Once test results were received by the Regional Office, a review was
performed by the Water Quality Management Branch to ensure all necessary
data and calculations were provided. Any corrections or modifications
of the test results were made through communication with the lab. All
data presented met the requirements of acceptability pertaining to the
standard methods used. In all cases, control survival of fish and
daphnids was >^90% The data entry procedure consisted of logging data
in a standard format; checking data; data entry into an IBM PC/AT;
retrieval and checking entered data; followed by final check and
correction. This protocol minimized errors in lab reports and during
transcription.
-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spreadsheet of Effluent Toxicity Results
All whole effluent toxicity data, plus other related data and
information on the facility, effluent chemistry, and receiving waters
are presented in Appendix A. This database contains results for a total
of 520 effluent tests. Most of the data were collected under the
effluent testing program, although some were collected during special
projects (e.g., U.S. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, TX; Tinker Air
Force Base, Midwest City, OK; Tyler Pipe, Swan, TX) . Only data
collected by the Regional Laboratory were evaluated below.
Comparative Sensitivity of Test Methods
Fig. 1 summarizes results for 38 effluents where side-by-side testing
with the 96 h algal test and either 24-48 h Daphnia, 8 d fathead minnow
tests, or both, were conducted during FY 1987-88 (see also, Appendix
B.I). Sensitivity was evaluated by directly comparing EC/LC50 values
in terms of percent effluent. This evaluation included a wide variety
of facility types and potential pollutants. In 31 cases when all three
tests were conducted on the same samples, the algal test was most
sensitive in 16 (52%) of the cases; the Daphnia test in 5 (16%) of the
cases; and the minnow test was most sensitive in two (6%) cases. On
eight occasions (26%) the alga was equally sensitive to the Daphnia or
minnow tests, or both. In some respects this comparison may be biased
since the endpoint in the algal test reflects cell numbers, expressed
as EC50, compared to lethality of Daphnia and minnow, which is expressed
as LC50. Also, because the tests differed in duration, it is important
to realize that test sensitivity, rather than species sensitivity, is
being compared.
A total of 96 effluents from a variety of facility types were
concurrently tested with 24-48 h Daphnia and 8 d fathead minnow tests
(Fig. 2; Appendix B.2). Overall, the Daphnia test was more sensitive
in 40 (42%) of the cases, while the fathead minnow test was most
sensitive in 31 (32%) of the cases. The response was similar in 25
(26%) of the effluents tested. In situations where unionized ammonia
was considered to be the primary toxic agent, based on chemical
measurement of the effluent sample, the minnow was more sensitive than
the Daphnia. The opposite was true when Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
was the suspected primary toxic agent. These findings are consistent
with the published literature on the toxicity of these substances to
aquatic life, which is summarized on the following page (U.S. EPA 1985d;
1985e).
-------
-9-
Toxicant
Daphnia
Fathead Minnow
Total Residual Chlorine
Acute Value (LC50)
Chronic Value (ChV)
Un-Ionized Ammonia
Acute Value
Chronic Value
27.7 ug/1
3.7 ug/1
1.91 mg/1
0.53 mg/1
105.2 ug/1
11.2 ug/1
2.07 mg/1
0.22 mg/1
It is interesting that the Daphnia pulex acute test was generally
more sensitive than than the fathead minnow tests, in spite of the much
shorter test duration. This may be reflective of the relative
intolerance of Daphnia pulex to metals, TRC and/or chloramines.
The findings here give further weight to the multiple species testing
approach to account for ranges of tolerance of different species to
particular toxic agents. While the algal test was more sensitive to
effluents than either Daphnia or fathead minnow tests, it has generally
not been considered in EPA or state permitting programs. The test is
relevant in all discharge situations where aquatic plants are
ecologically important and/or where chronic tests more sensitive than
the daphnid/fathead minnow tests may be necessary to adequately protect
water quality.
One possible reason why the algal test has not been considered in
toxicity testing programs is the presumption that stimulatory effects
could complicate the procedure. In this investigation stimulation was
not a problem. Of the 38 Selenastrum tests conducted, only six (16%)
were stimulatory at one or more effluent concentrations (see Appendix
A). In one situation a dechlorinated municipal effluent was
stimulatory. In several cases, when stimulation was found at low
effluent concentrations, toxicity ocurred at higher concentrations,
which indicates the presence of ammonia. In the few cases where
stimulation was demonstrated, we do not view this to be a problem which
would hinder assessment of toxicity: stimulatory effects show that the
effluent is nontoxic to the alga. However, this may indicate the
potential for eutrophication problems.
Comparison of Toxicity of Industrial
and Municipal Discharges
Results of toxicity tests on various industrial facility types are
summarized in Figs. 3 and 4, and Appendix C. Of the five industrial
categories evaluated, Industrial Organic Chemicals (SIC Code=2869) was
the most toxic to Daphnia, and least toxic to the fathead minnow.
Although the number of tests was limited (see Appendix C.5), federal
facilities (9711) ranked high with regard to the incidence and degree
-------
-10-
of effluent -toxicity, particularly to the minnow, where all tests showed
an effect. The incidence of toxicity was lower for Daphnia (46% of tests
toxic), but the percent of tests exhibiting high toxicity was greater.
At least half of the samples tested from these federal facilities may
have been toxic due to TRC based on a comparison of measured effluent
-values and generally accepted chronic values for TRC. The percentage
of samples from federal facilities with high effluent toxicity was
greater than other industrial categories, which suggests that this group
may deserve priority consideration with regard to toxics control.
Eesults were very similar for the plating and polishing facilities,
which ranked high in terms of incidence of toxicity to the fathead
minnow, and degree of effect to the Daphnia. Plastics Materials and
Eesins (2821) and Petroleum Refining (2911) categories ranked
intermediately, with the fathead minnow test exhibiting a considerably
higher incidence of toxicity than the Daphnia. Overall, 100% effluent
from the five industrial categories investigated exhibited acute
toxicity to Daphnia about 30% to 55% of the time, while chronic toxicity
to the fathead minnow was found 45% to 100% of the time.
Fig. 5. summarizes the data for municipal sewage treatment plants.
The occurrence and degree of toxicity was relatively high for all three
types of tests, with 70%-90% of the effluents showing toxic effects,
depending on the species. Of those effluents exhibiting significant
toxicity, an extraordinarily high percentage were highly toxic to
Daphnia (55%) and alga (58%), compared to the fathead minnow (15%) . The
findings were probably most reflective of the intolerance of these
species to TRC. However, it is clear from the data summarized in Fig.
6, that toxicity was not being caused by TRC exclusively. This figure
demonstrates that toxicity occurs in Daphnia. minnow and algal tests,
even when the effluent TRC was nondetectable, or after samples were
dechlorinated. It is plausible that TRC could have been present in some
of these samples at concentrations below the detection limit. However,
other substances may also be toxic, including ammonia. Toxic effects
considered not to be due to TRC were more apparent in minnow and algal
tests (>50% of effluents tested) compared to the Daphnia test (10%).
Overall, municipal effluents were more toxic than the industrial
categories investigated, which was probably influenced by, but not
limited to, the presence of TRC. These findings support the Region's
initiative to require dechlorination of major municipal discharges, and
Toxicity Reduction Evaluations (TRE's), which serve to identify and
control toxic pollutants, and are required under the present permitting
policy.
Potential Effects of Discharges
on Receiving Waters
Table 1 lists 109 discharges in EPA Region 6 which, based on
calculated instream dilution, could potentially result in toxic effects
to receiving waters. The list was developed using both acute and
chronic test results, and the critical stream flow. The general policy
of EPA and inany states, is to prohibit acute toxicity in the mixing
zone. In all cases, the state water quality standards allow for a
percentage of the stream flow or width for a zone of passage. This
study did not include an evaluation of potential toxic effects within
-------
-11-
mixing zones. Doing so would have increased the number of facilities
listed, since the degree of dilution would be lower for the mixing zone
"than the entire stream flow.
In the majority of cases, only very limited chemical analyses were
performed on the samples, therefore, determination of toxic agents was
problematic. In many cases, it appears that TRC and ammonia were
significant pollutants. Ammonia was prevalent at toxic levels in
numerous municipal and industrial discharges.
Overall, there are concerns regarding the potential impacts of dis-
chargers on waters in the Region. In these situations, more definitive
effluent testing, toxicity testing of receiving waters, and biological
surveys may be appropriate to elucidate and resolve water quality
concerns. These water bodies should also be evaluated to determine the
need for listing under Section 304(1).
CONCLUSIONS
The purpose of this study was to compile and evaluate whole effluent
toxicity data generated by the EPA Region 6 Laboratory during FY 1984-
88. A LOTUS l-2-3R spreadsheet was developed to present toxicity data,
as well as pertinent information on the facilities, effluent chemical
characteristics, and receiving water. The database contains results for
520 tests. The testing procedures included the 24-48 h daphnid acute,
8 d fathead minnow chronic, and 96 h algal (Selenastrum capricornutum)
chronic methods for freshwater effluents, and 8 d sheepshead minnow
chronic test for saltwater situations. When all three freshwater tests
were conducted side by side on a variety of effluents, the algal test
was most sensitive (52% of the time), followed by Paphnja and fathead
minnow tests (most sensitive 16% and 6% of the time, respectively).
However, because these tests have different durations and endpoints,
caution should be used in gauging sensitivity. The findings support
EPA's recommendations concerning the importance of multiple species
testing to address differences in species sensitivity.
Effluent toxicity results for several industrial categorties and
municipal sewage treatment plants were evaluated and compared. For the
industrial categories evaluated, the daphnid test was most sensitive to
Industrial Organic Chemical facilities (SIC Code=2869) and Federal
Facilities (9711), followed by the Plating and Polishing category
(3471). The Plastics Materials and Resins (2821) and Petroleum Refining
(2911) effluents affected Daphnia less than other industrial categories
investigated. Federal Facilities and Plating and Polishing facilities
had the greatest effect in the fathead minnow test, with all effuents
showing significant toxicity in 100% effluent. These were followed by
petroleum refining (with about 65% of effluents significantly toxic),
Plastics Materials and Resins (50% toxic) and Industrial Organic
Chemicals (about 45% toxic). Overall, the industrial categories
evaluated demonstrated acute toxicity to Daphnia in about 30%-55% of the
cases, while chronic toxicity to fathead minnow was exhibited in 45%-
100% of the cases, depending on the category examined.
-------
-12-
Municipal effluents were generally more toxic than the industrial
categories investigated, which was probably most influenced by total
residual chlorine, although toxicity also resulted from other toxic
agents. Overall, significant toxic effects were demonstrated in
Daphnia, fathead minnow and algal tests in 69%, 74% and 92%, respective-
ly, of the municipal effuents evaluated.
Finally, an assessment of the potential for receiving water toxic
effects was conducted, which incorporated the degree of effluent
"toxicity and instream dilution. A total of 109 dischargers in EPA
Region 6 were found to have the potential for causing receiving water
effects. In these situations, more definitive effluent testing,
toxicity testing of receiving waters, and biological surveys may be
appropriate to elucidate and resolve water quality concerns. These
water bodies should also be evaluated to determine the need for listing
under Section 304(1).
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. To the extent possible, the algal (Selenastrum capricornutum) chronic
test should be integrated with other standard short-term chronic tests,
as in most situations the aquatic plant community warrants protection.
Applications could include effluent testing under the NPDES program, and
in special water quality studies to define the effects of effuent
discharges.
2. Continued effluent screening should be conducted to further expand
the present database. The testing conducted to date has provided
insight into the occurrence and magnitude of effluent toxicity in the
Region. Based on the differences in species sensitivity, the multiple
species testing approach should be maintained. The Regional effluent
testing program should be reevaluated with regard to emphasis, direction
and methodology, on an annual basis. If possible, the direction should
be shifted to include site-specific testing of effluents and receiving
waters which need consideration under CWA Section 304(1). Also, while
it is understood that resources at the Regional Lab are limited, an
effort should be made to incorporate Regional Permitting Policy sampling
and testing procedures, if resources allow.
3. To the extent possible, the Regional Laboratory should further
develop its marine chronic testing capability, which would allow for
multiple species testing of effluents which dicharge to marine and
estuarine environments.
4. The states should evaluate the testing results contained herein.
They should use their discretion in further investigating discharges
•which could result in instream toxicity. Such investigations could
include receiving water and effluent toxicity testing, chemical analyses
and biosurveys.
-------
-13-
5. The Permits Branch should utilize the data contained in this report
(Appendix A) when establishing requirements for reissued permits. The
data could be useful with regard to establishing monitoring frequency;
to evaluate the need for whole effluent toxicity testing and permit
limitations; to supplement self monitoring data; and to target and
prioritize facilites for special emphasis.
6. Based on the likelihood of instream toxicity resulting from total
residual chlorine and ammonia present in both industrial and municipal
discharges, the states should develop numeric water quality standards
for these parameters as a measure to better protect aquatic life related
beneficial uses.
-------
-14-
LITERATURE CITED
APHA. 1980. Standard Methods for the Evaluation of Water and Was-
tewater (15th Edition). American Public Health Association, Washington,
B.C.
U.S. EPA. 1985a. Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents
to Freshwater and Marine Organisms. Edited by Peltier, W.H. and C.I.
Weber. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, Office of Research and Develop-
ment. EPA/600/4-85/013.
U.S. EPA. 1978. NEIC Policies and Procedures. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, National Enforcement Investigation Center, Denver,
CO. EPA/330/9-78-001-R (Revised 1983).
U.S. EPA. 1985b. Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic
Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms.
Edited by Horning, W.B. and C.I. Weber, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH,
Office of Research and Development. EPA/600/4-85/014.
U.S. EPA. 1985c. Technical Support Document for Water Quality-Based
Toxics Control. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water,
Washington, D.C. EPA/440/4-85-032.
U.S. EPA. 1985d. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chlorine-1984.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and
Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. 1985e. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia-1984. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and
Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. 1988. Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity
of Effluents and Receiving; Waters to Marine and Estuarine Organisms.
Edited by Weber, C.I. et a_l. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, Office
of Research and Development. EPA/600/4-87/028.
W.E. Gates & Associates, Inc. 1982. Estimation of Stream Flow for the
Reach File (Draft). June 1982.
-------
-15-
FIGUEES
-------
SIDE BY SIDE TESTING
RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF DAPHNID,
MINNOW AND ALGA TOXICITY TESTS
Alga Test
Most Sensitive
52%
Daphnid Test
Most Sensitive
16%
Minnow Test
Most Sensitive
6%
Fig. 1
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daphnia pulex, 8 d Fathead Minnow,
and/or 96 h Algal (Selenastrum capricornutum) Toxicity Tests
Conducted Concurrently for 38 Effluents.
Alga Response Similar
to Daphnid and/or
Minnow
26%
-------
SIDE BY SIDE TESTING
RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF DAPHNID AND
MINNOW TOXICITY TESTS
Daphnid Response
Similar to Minnow
26%
Daphnid Test
Most Sensitive
42%
Minnow Test
More Sensitive
Fig. 2
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daphnia pulex and 8 d Fathead Minnow
Toxicity Tests Conducted Concurrently for 96 Effluents.
/0
-------
-18-
INDUSTR1AL AND FEDERAL FACILITIES
ACUTE EFFECTS TO DAPHNIA PULEX
60
y
x
o
o
2
5
o
i
U)
2
Ld
D
z
LJ
O
dC
UJ
Q.
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
N=15
N = 26
N=13
N=12
2821
2869
291 1
SIC CODE
LOW
MEDIUM
3471
X///A HIGH TOX1CITY
971 1
Fig. 3.
Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities to Daphnia
pulex. Standard Industrial Classification Codes Investigated
include: 2821 (Plastics Materials and Resins); 2869 (Industrial
Organic Chemicals); 2911 (Petroleum Refining); 3471 (Plating and
Polishing); and 9711 (Federal Facilities).
-------
-19-
o
X
o
H
o
z
5
o
I
in
u.
G
INDUSTRIAL AND FEDERAL FAC LITIES
CHRONIC EFFECTS TO FATHEAD MINNOW
N=10
N=12
N=8
2869
291 1
S'C C'*~-DE
LOW
34-71
HIGH TOXIC1TY
971 1
Fig 4.
Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Federal Facilities to the
Fathead Minnow. Standard Industrial Classification Codes
Investigated include: 2821 (Plastics Materials and Resins); 2869
(Industrial Organic Chemicals); 2911 (Petroleum Refining); 3471
(Plating and Polishing); and 9711 (Federal Facilities).
-------
-20-
MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
EFFECTS TO DAPHNMA. MINNOW AND ALGA
o
X
o
o
z
o
5)
(/i
i-
u
D
u.
UJ
UJ
a
DAPH:
LOW
N=27
ALGA
TYPE OF TEST
HIGH TOX1CITY
Fig. 5.
Relative Toxicity of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants to Daphnia
Fathead Minnow and Alga fSelenastrum capricornut-.nm)
-------
-21-
z
ui
D
b.
o
(-
z
UJ
o
o:
ui
a
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS
TOXIC EFFECTS NOT DUE TO CHLORINE
N = 8 OF 82
DAPHMA
N=14 OF 27
MINNOW
TYPE OF TEST
N=8 OF 15
ALGA
/ ] CL2 NOT DETECTED
TOXIC AFTER OECL2
Fig. 6.
Percentage of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Effluents Tested
With, Daphnia pulex. Fathead Minnow and Alga (Selenastruro
capricornuturo) Where Chlorine was not Detected, or Which Were Toxic
After Samples were Dechlorinated.
-------
-22-
TMEES
-------
-23-
Table 1.
List of Water Bodies in Region 6 Which Have the Potential for
Instream Toxicity.
NPDES NUMBER
ARKANSAS
AR 0000523
AR 0000582
AR 0000680
AR 0001210
AR 0001236
AR 0003018
AR 0020338
AR 0021733
AR 0021750
AR 0021792
AR 0022624
AR 0033375
AR 0033766
AR 0034321
AR 0034380
AR 0035645
LOUISIANA
LA 0000493
LA 0002917
LA 0003824
LA 0004057
LA 0004090
LA 0005941
LA 0006131
LA 0008036
LA 0020044
LA 0020087
LA 0032417
LA 0034568
LA 0036366
LA 0038091
LA 0041751
LA 0046477
LA 0056502
NEW MEXICO
NM 0020737
KM 0028827
001
010
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
003
001
004
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
ALCOA
GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL
GEORGIA PACIFIC
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
TYSON FOODS
USAF-BLYTHEVILLE AFB
DEQUEEN
FORT SMITH-MASSARD CRK
BERRYVILLE
HOWMET (ALUMAX)
STERLING FAUCET
PARAGOULD
HARRISON
STUTTGART
GLENUOOD
REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
S.W. ELECTRIC POWER
FIRESTONE
GRANT CHEMICAL
ETHYL CORP.
CITCO CITIES SERVICE
TECHN I GRAPHICS
CLECO
PLAIN DEALING
OBERLIN
ATLAS PROCESSING
BERNICE
LAKE CHARLES PLT C
NEW ORLEANS-E. BANK
EUNICE
JONESBORO
MANY
GRANTS
LAS VEGAS
RECEIVING WATER
LAKE CATHERINE
HURRICANE CREEK
GUM CREEK
COFFEE CRK TO OUACHITA R.
BIG CRK TO FRANCOIS CRK
LITTLE R., ROLLING FK.
PEMISCOT BAYOU
BEAR CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
OSAGE CREEK
BIG CREEK
TOWN BRANCH/HURRICANE CRK
EIGHTMILE CREEK
CROOKED CREEK
KINGS BAYOU
CADDO RIVER
TRIB. TO CALCASIEU RIVER
CADDO LAKE
BAYOU d'INDE
DITCH TO BATON ROUGE BAYOU
MONTE SANO BAYOU
CALCASIEU RIVER
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL
LAKE ROOEMACHER
CYPRESS BAYOY
BLUE BAYOU
BRUSHY BAYOU
BAYOU D'ARBONNE
CALCASIEU RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BAYOU MALLET
DUGDEHONA CREEK
BAYOU LA NANA
RIO SAN JOSE
GALLINAS RIVER
POSSIBLE
TOXIC AGENTS
AMMONIA/ VANADIUM
METALS ?
?
?
AMMONIA
CHLORINE
?
?
CHLORINE
?
pH
METALS
AMMONIA
CHLORINE
AMMONIA
CHLORINE
UNKNOWN
AMMONIA
?
AMMONIA
?
AMMONIA
7
?
?
?
?
?
?
AND OTHER(S)
ORGAN I CS
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
?
AMMONIA
?
CHLORINE
7
AMMONIA/CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
-------
TABLE 1, Continued...
-24-
NPDES NUMBER
OKLAHOMA
-------
TABLE 1, Continued...
-25-
NPDES NUMBER
FACILITY NAME
RECEIVING WATER
POSSIBLE TOXIC AGENTS
TX 0024228 001 STEPHENV1LLE
TX 0024309 001 LUFKIN
TX 0024568 001 JASPER
TX 0024678 001 GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
TX 0024686 001 GARLAND-ROWLETT CREEK
TX 0025429 001 USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
TX 0026263 001 SPENCER ROAD MUD
TX 0026751 001 EL PASO-HASKELL
TX 0027537 001 WAXAHACH1E
TX 0046884 001 HOUSTON-NORTHSIDE
TX 0046957 001 AUSTIN-GOVALLE
TX 0046990 001 BEAUMONT
TX 0047058 001 CORPUS CHRIST I-OSO
TX 0047074 001 CORPUS CHRIST!-WEST SIDE
TX 0047104 001 C. CHRIST I-LACUNA MADRE
TX 0047295 001 FORT yORTH-VILLAGE CREEK
TX 0047309 001 GALVESTON-MAIN
TX 0047431 001 HTMWD-MESQUITE
TX 0047651 001 TEMPLE
TX 0047830 001 DALLAS-CENTRAL
TX 0047848 001 DALLAS-SOUTHSIOE
TX 0052761 001 SHELL DEVELOPMENT CO,
TX 0052892 001 LEWISVILLE
TX 0053023 001 CHAMPION PAPER CO.
TX 0055611 001 GREENVILLE
TX 0056111 001 USAF-LACKLAND AFB
TX 0056731 001 CORSICANA-PLANT «2
TX 0072982 001 HOLLY FARMS
TX 0084409 002 DENKA CHEMICAL
TX 0085570 001 FORMOSA PLASTICS
TX 0089125 001 EXXON CHEMICAL
N. BOSQUE RIVER
HURRICANE CREEK
SANDY CREEK
DUCK CREEK
ROULETT CREEK
PLUM C. TO WICHITA R.
HORSEPEN CREEK TO HSC
RIO GRANDE
N, PRONG CREEK
BUFFALO BAYOU
COLORADO RIVER
HILDEBRANDT BAYOU
OSO BAY
LA VOLLO CRK TO OSO CRK
LACUNA MADRE
U. FORK TRINITY RIVER
GALVESTON BAY
MESQUITE CREEK
LITTLE ELM CREEK
TRINITY RIVER
TRINITY RIVER
D. TO N. FORK BRAYS B.
ELM FK. TRINITY RIVER
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
COULEECH CREEK
TR1B. TO MED10 CREEK
RICHLAND CREEK
PRAIRIE CRK TO TENAHA CRK
SIMS BAYOU TO HSC
TRIB. TO COX CREEK
CEDAR BAYOU
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORI ME/ORGAN ICS
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE ?
CHLORINE
?
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE
METALS ?
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
AMMOM!A/CHLORINE
CHLORINE
CHLORINE
?
CHLORINE ?
CHLORINE
AMMONIA/CHLORINE
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
?
AMMONIA
CHLORINE/OTHERCS)
-------
-26-
APPENDICES
-------
-27-
APPENDIX A
U.S. EPA REGION VI EFFLUENT TOXICITY DATA
A description of the data, information, and evaluations
included in the spreadsheet are presented below.
J. - Numerical Order of Data.
NPDES # — Generally accepted NPDES number, taken from PCS or
permit.
Facility Name - Most current facility name, taken from PCS or
permit.
SIC Code - Standard Industrial Classification Code, taken from PCS.
Location — City where facility is located.
Receiving Water Name - Generally accepted receiving water name,
taken from the NPDES permit file.
Stream Flows (Mean and 7010) - Stream flow values (in CFS), were
obtained from the Permits Branch and consist of data from published
low flow values, USGS data, or from the STORET Gage File. For
states using 7Q2 as the critical low flow, 7Q2 values are presented
in place of 7Q10's, if data was available. Some stream flow values
from facilities which do not yet have "third round" permits should
be considered tentative.
Pipe Flow (Mean and Maximum) - Discharge flow values (in MGD) were
primarily taken from PCS. In some cases flow data were also taken
from discharge monitoring reports (DMR's). Mean flows were
calculated using 10-15 monthly average values? maxima are maximum
recorded values for the same period of record.
IWC - Instream Waste Concentration, estimated as the percent
effluent dilution in the receiving water after mixing, calculated
using the following equation:
Oe x 100
IWC(%) = Qe + Qs,
where Qe and Qs are average pipe flow and critical (7Q10) stream
flows, respectively, in CFS units. Because the stream flow values
are considered tentative, the IWC should also be considered as
such.
Sample Collection Date - Date when the facility was sampled.
Effluent Physical/Chemical Characteristics - Parameters measured
included salinity (o/oo); specific conductance (uMHO/cm); hardness
and alkalinity (mg/1 as CaC03) , pH, total residual chlorine (mg/1);
and unionized ammonia. These measurements were taken at test
initiation, and in some cases during tests. Minimum DO (mg/1 or
-------
-28-
% saturation) experienced during the course of the of the test is
also presented to determine whether low DO could have contributed
to mortality, if it occurred.
Test Species - The test organisms included daphnids Daphnia pulex
and Ceriodaphnia dubia; fathead minnow, Piraephales promelas; green
alga, Selenastrum capricornutum7 opposum shrimp, Mvsidopsis bahia
or M. almyra; sheepshead minnow, Cyprinodon variegatus; sea urchin,
Arbacia puntulata; and red macroalga, Champia parvula. The most
data are available for D. pulex (acute test), although a
considerable amount of chronic data were collected during FY 1986-
88 for fathead minnow, sheepshead minnow and alga. One special
study (U.S. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi), includes data for
sea urchin and red alga and in, one case, a MICROTOX test was
conducted.
Test Length - Duration of test in days, as follows:
1-3 d (24-96 h) Acute Tests
4-9 d (96-216 h) Chronic Tests
LC50 - Calculated LC50 or EC50 is presentd in percent effluent
where mortality is >. 50% in 100% effluent. The Trimmed Spearman-
Karber procedure was used prior to April, 1987, and the Probit
procedure was used thereafter. Where calculations have been made,
24 h, 48 h, and chronic LCSO's or EC50's are presented.
Mortality in 100% Effluent - Mortality (%) in undiluted effluent.
If effluents had detectable chlorine, results for 100%
dechlorinated effluent were also included.
NOEC/LOEC - Lowest observed and no observed effect concentrations
for chronic tests. Effects include mortality , combined with
teratogenicity, in fish tests, and mortality and reproduction in
Ceriodaphnia tests. Significance was evaluated using Dunnett's
Test and ANOVA at P=0.95.
Comments — Included here are: the 95% confidence interval (CI, in
percent effluent) around the LC50/EC50, the chronic value (ChV, in
percent effluent, and pertinent notes regarding effluent chemical
characteristics and toxicity. In many cases the CI's were not
calculable, thus, are not provided. The ChV was calculated as the
geometric mean of the LOEC and NOEC, and is equivalent to the
maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC).
Potential for Instream Effects - The potential for receiving water
toxic effects was assessed primarily with the following criteria
from EPA's Technical Support Document (U.S. EPA 1985c) and state
water quality standards implementation procedures or policy:
-Potential for instream acute effects if IWC>LC1,
where LC1=0.3 x LC50;
-Potential for instream chronic effects if IWC>NOEC;
-------
-29-
-For Texas estuaries, the IWC=8% effluent;
-For Texas Lakes, the IWC is 16% effluent;
-Houston Ship Channel Dischargers have an assumed IWC of
30% effluent, at which acute effects are evaluated;
-The state of Louisiana has requested that a low flow of
111,000 be used for the Mississippi River; and
-Some best professional judgement was used in assessing
potential effects in "no flow" situations (e.g., lakes),
or where stream or pipe flow data, and specific
implementation procedures were not available.
It should be realized that prediction of instream toxic effects is
contingent on whole effluent toxicity behaving conservatively in
the receiving water. This evaluation also assumes zero upstream
toxicity. In fact, these assumptions may not be valid in every
case.
-------
1
1 NPDES 1
1 AR 0000043
2 (W 0000523
3 AR 0000523
4 AR 0000523
5 AR 0000523
6 AR 0000523
7 OR 0000531
8 AR 0000582
9 AR 0000582
10 AR 0000582
11 AR 0000591
12 AR 0000591
13 AR 0000647
14 AR 0000663
IS AR 0000680
«_
rorii irwnFrF TUTtf^ UATFR IPfHRHfiTinN
1 " 1 HLlt-l i T / nCLttViHU MMICn imjHTXI Hjn
OUT-
FALL
t
001
001
002
002
001
001
002
009
009
010
001
001
001
002
FACILITY NAME
DARLINB STORE FIXTURES
STRATEGIC KIWWL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
REYNOLDS METALS
ALCOA
ALCOA
ALCOA
CROSS OIL
CROSS OIL
TOSCO CORP. REFINERY
BERRY PETROLEUM
GREAT LAKES OOlCflL
SIC
CODE
3471
1094
1094
1094
1094
1094
3334
3334
3334
3334
2911
an
2911
2911
2879
i ivfiTfm
LOCATION
(CITY)
PARAGOULD
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
HOT SPRINGS
ARKADaPHIA
BAUXITE
BAUXITE
BAUXITE
SmCXDVER
SMACKOVER
a DORADO
STEPHENS
a DORADO
RECEIVING WATER NAME
EIBKTHILE CREEK
LAKtOmCRM
LAKE CATHERINE
LAKE CATHERINE
LAKE CATHERINE
LAKE CATHERINE
OUACHITA RIVER
HURRICANE CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
SMACKOVER CREEK
SMACXOVER CREEK
BAYOU DE LOUTRE
TRIB. TO SMACKOVER CRX
GUM CREEK
STREAM ROM
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
133.88 0.12
120
120
120
120
120
2401 95
116 0
116 0
115 0
365 0.353
365 0.353
89 1.8
247 0.353
PIPE ROM
(NED)
MEAN MAX.
0.12 0.23
0.29 1.69
0.42 8.65
0.42 8.65
0.29 1.69
0.29 1.69
1.17 1.66
4.84 12,43
4.84 12.43
2.49 4.75
0.1 0.23
0.1 0.23
2.03 2.79
0.04 0.1
0.4 0.87
iur
1ML
(*>
61.21
0.37
0.83
0.83
0.37
0.37
1.87
60.78
60.78
100
19.69
19.69
63.64
9
SAMPLE
DATE
06-J*n-&6
07-M*r6S
25-Feb-86
25-Feb-86
25-Ftb-86
25-FeM6
24-Mir-86
21-Jan-85
21-Jin-«5
21-«ov-85
29-JuI-86
29-M-86
12-Mar-84
12-*ar-85
a-Stp-86
Fff\ ir»T OHYStCa /DFNICflt rHQROTTFUICTire
SflL-
TNTTY
li»l 1 1
(o/oo)
0
78
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CQKDUC-
TQNfT
IM1UC
(UHHO/CM)
2100
49000
800
BOO
1200
1200
140
700
700
850
1700
1700
3000
2350
650
HARDNESS
(MG/L ftS
C*C03)
92
204
204
373
373
29
92
92
509
102
102
70
130
39
ALKALINITY
(MR/I OK
CaCQ3>
182
17
17
42
42
29
19
19
4
54
54
101
136
a
(SU)
8.3
7.7
6.8
6.8
8.0
8.0
7.6
6.9
6.9
6.3
7.8
7.8
7.6
8.6
6.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
fur
Iff:
(M6/L)
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
(MS/L)
(0.2
(0.2
(0.2
0.7
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
MB/LI
Mtf
*
SAT.)
8.7
e.f,
90*
7.9
8.2
92*
8.2
8.4
8.4
9.3
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.8
8.3
1
1 NPDES 1
t AR
2 AR
3 AR
4 AD
5 AR
6 AR
7 AD
8 AR
9 AR
10 AR
11 AR
12 AR
13 AR
14 AR
IS AR
i
0000043
0000523
0000523
0000523
0000523
0000523
0000531
0000582
0000582
0000582
0000591
0000391
0000647
0000663
0000680
OUT-
FCLL
1
001
001
002
002
001
001
002
009
009
010
001
001
001
002
FACILITY NAME
DARLING STORE FIXTURES
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
STRATEGIC MINERAL CORP.
REYNOLDS METALS
ALCOA
ALCOA
ALCOA
CROSS OIL
CROSS OIL
TOSCO CORP. REFINERY
BERRY PETROLEUM
GREAT LAKES OENICfll
--,—-—
1
!
i
S
!
1 TEST SPECIES
! D.
I H.
I P.
1 D.
! D.
1 P.
: D.
t D.
! P.
: D.
: P.
! D.
1 D.
I p.
i D.
-I
PULEX
BAHIA
PRONELAS
PULEX
PULEX
PRONEU6
PULEX'
PULEX
PROMELAS
PULEX
PRONELAS
PULEX
PULEX
PROHELAS
PULEX
tj
TEST
LENGTH
iy
IN
DAYS 24H
1
2 3
7
2 100
2 7
7
2 68
2 72
(•(•LltMI IUIIUIIY
LC50 MORTALITY
t U t A/W
IH lUv*
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
0
3 100
15
44 95
4 100
53 100
68 100
0
0
80
0
5
0
0
67 100
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 1001 PERCENT
DECHLQR- EFRUENT
»HAW«
iNHftU
EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
100
90
100
50 25
100
0
0
90
20
NOTE: CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
_
ChV«CHRONlC VflLUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
SPEC. COND. FOR 50i EFFL. ; NOTE HIGH SALINITY
NO
CI:
CI:
CI:
CI:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
SIS. TORT. AFTER 7 DAYS
35-57 (48H)
5-10 (24W; 3-6 (48H)
45-63; ChV*35*
64-73 I2*H t 48H!
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTHEAN
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
ND (CUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES MUTE
I
u>
o
I
-------
r-fu«ri • •rufnrr'Vtiirun liivrrD turnOMlvrinu 1—
1 NPDES 1
16 AR 0000680
17 AN 0000752
18 RR 0001210
19 RR 0001236
20 RR 0001236
21 AR 0001236
22 RR 0001236
23 RR 0001449
24 RR 0001449
25 RR 0001449
26 RR 0001449
27 RR 0001678
28 RR 0001678
29 RR 0001678
30 RR 0001678
OUT-
FALL
t
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
002
002
002
FACILITY NAME
BREflT LAKES CHEMICAL
a DORADO CHEMICAL CO.
BEOR61A PACIFIC
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPEC1RLTY RESINS
A T 1 T TELETYPE
A T 1 T TELETYPE
A T t T TELETYPE
A T 1 T TELETYPE
USR-P1* BLUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
SIC
OK
2879
2873
2621
2821
2821
2821
2821
3661
3661
3661
3661
2892
2892
2892
2892
LOCATION
(CITY)
a DORADO
EL DORADO
CROSSETT
MALVERN
HALVEDN
MALVERN
NALVERN
LITTLE ROCK
LITTLE ROCK
LITTLE ROCK
LITTLE ROCK
PINE BLUFF
PINE BLUFF
PINE BLUFF
PIKE BLUFF
STREAM FLOU
(CFS) PIPE FLOU
(TENTATIVE) (HBO)
RECEIVING WATER NAME MEAN 7010 MEAN NRX.
BUM CREEK 0.4 0.87
TDIB. TO FLflT CREEK 58 1.14 1.18 3.45
COFFEE CRK TO OUACHITA 6113 10844.89 88.1
BIB C. TO FRflNCQIS C. 142.3 1.3S 0.31 0.41
BIG C. TO FRRNCOIS C. 142.3 1.35 0.31 0.41
BIB C. TO FRANCOIS C. 142.3 1.35 0.31 0.41
BIG C. TO FRANCOIS C. 142.3 1.35 0.31 0.41
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.13
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.15
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.15
FOURCHE CREEK 63 2.7 0.09 0.15
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
TRIB. TO ARKANSAS RIVER 41732 1387 0.27 0.75
IMC
(*)
38.38
39.19
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
3.41
3.41
3.41
3.41
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DflTE
23-Svp-S6
16-Apr-fi5
16-Jal-85
29-Oct-86
29-«ct-86
16-**-88
16-ftar-BB
29-Jul-86
20-*»y-87
20-H»y-87
20-May-fl7
13-«ov-B4
22-flpr-86
19-Ort-87
19-Oct-87
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
0
0
3
3
2
2
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
EFFLUPT Duviira tnrtnnt nHwarmii'mre
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMNO/CM)
650
993
2300
2300
2300
2800
2800
950
500
500
500
500
1325
850
850
HARNESS
(NG/L RS
CaC03)
39
9£
256
8
8
20
20
40
22
22
22
118
528
HLKflLllHTY
(MG/L AS
C«C03>
8
27
180
853
S53
835
835
IB
7
7
7
17
35
PH
(SU)
6.4
7.3
7.7
8.9
8.9
8.1
8.1
7.8
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.2
8.3
8.7
8,7
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
10. 1
(0.1
(0,1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MG/L)
(0.1
)4.7
)4.7
6.6
6.6
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
0.8
0.8
MINI-
MUM
DO
MG/L)
DO*
SAT.)
91*
8.4
9
69*
B
72*
81*
8.3
95*
8
8.6
8.2
91*
8
OUT-
r*M I
rHLJ.
1 NPDES 1 1
16 RR 0000680
17 AR 0000752 001
IB RR 0001210 001
19 RR 0001236 001
20 RR 0001236 001
21 AR 0001236 001
22 RR 0001236 001
23 AR 0001449 001
24 AR 0001449 001
25 AR 0001449 001
26 AR 0001449 001
27 RR 0001678 002
28 RR 0001678 002
29 RR 0001678 002
30 RR 0001671 002
,
FACILITY NAME
GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL
a DORADO CHEMICAL CO.
GEORGIA PACIFIC
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
BTL SPECIALTY RESINS
A T I T TELETYPE
AT i T TELETYPE
AT t T TELETYPE
A T 1 T TELETYPE
USA-PIC BLUFF ARSENAL
UBR-P1NE BLUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BUFF ARSENAL
USA-PINE BLUFF ARSENAL
— t
!
!
1
.
! TEST SPECIES
! t. PRONRAS
1 0. PULEX
! D. PULEI
t P. PRQHELAS
1 D. PULEI
! P. PRONELAS
1 D. PULEX
: D. PULEX
i P. PROMELAS
! SELENASTRUM
! D. PULEX
: D. PULEX
I D. PULEI
I P. PROMELAS
! D. PULEX
-l
TEST
LENGTH
III
IN
DAYS 2
7
1
2
8
1
8
2
1
8
8
2
1
2
8
2
LC50 MORTALITY
1U 1AM
|-ir:-i-.ii:-.ir-j_:.:ii. I Mill .:in mm n: 11 nil* |p| jyUJ
4H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
73 100
3
45
28 100
70 100
8 100
27 100
0
0
11
0
0
24 1 95
46 100
36 65
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT RS
IN 100* PERCENT
DECH.OR- EFFLUENT
iki/M>f-n
EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
75 50
0
30
1 (1
12 6
0
30 25
i ujrrcn i a
NOTE: CI»95> CONFIDENCE INTERVAL RROUND LC50
ChV*CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
CI. -64-84; ChV=61*
-
-
ChV(l) VERY HIGH NH3) MDRT. IN ALL 6 DILUTIONS
NOTE EXTREMELY HIGH NK3| ABBREVIATED TEST
DiV*8.5*: NOTE HIGH NH3 AND COD
Cl!22-34j VERY HIGH NH3 RND COD
-
-
NO S1G. EFFECT
-
-
Ch 7-81 (24H)
ChV*35*
CI 122-66
POTENTIAL
FOR
tMGTBTQM
inalncm
EFFECTS
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
I
U)
-------
n n rnrti TTY fDrrTTWTMn iiftTFff TtfTiPMttTtfTM ____._^ — — .1 ; ,_,., • ... ,. • ..
•— ^.. -.-... i .•—•• — ."•.. « —.111.1. • 1' HLiLI 1 T/TCwClYinU f**(tn iPirunrBMI 1U1 "
1 NPDES 1
31 AR 0003018
32 AR 0003W8
33 AR 0020338
34 AR 0020702
35 AR 0020702
36 AR 0021211
37 AR 0021733
38 AR 0021730
39 AR 0021750
40 AR 0021792
41 AR 0021806
42 At 0022624
43 RR 0033278
44 AR 0033278
43 OR 0033278
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NAME
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
001 USAF-BLYTHEVILLE flFB
001 BATESVILLE
001 BATESVILLE
002 MOUNTAIN HONE
001 DEQUEEN
001 FORT SMITH-MASSARD CRK
001 FORT SHIT1HWSSARD CRK
BERRYVILLE
001 LITTLE ROCK-ADAMS FIELD
001 HOWCT (H.K.H. RLUHAI)
001 FORT SNITH-P STREET
001 FORT SNITH-P STREET
001 FORT SNITH-P STREET
BIC
CODE
2016
£016
9711
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
495E
4952
4952
3354
4952
4952
4952
LOCATION
(CITY)
OWMIS
BRANX1S
BLYTHEVILLE
BATESVILLE
BATESVILLE
NOtMTAINHONE
DEOUEEN
FORT SMITH
FORT SMITH
BERRYVILLE
LITTLE ROCK
MAGNOLIA
FORT SMITH
FORT SMITH
FORT SMITH
RECEIVING URTER NAME
LITTLE R., ROLL1MB FK.
LITTLER., ROUWFR.
PENISCOT BAYOU
WHITE RIVER
WHITE RIVER
HICKS CREEK
BEAR CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
OSA6E CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
BIB CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
STREAM FLOW
ICFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7D10
122.55 0.12
I£?.H 0.12
6.05 0
11909 8%
11909 8%
43.16 14
114 0.12
30206 722
30206 722
204 0
40961 1355
115.3 0.1
29628 709
29628 709
29628 709
PIPE FLOW
(MGD)
MEM MAI.
0.2 0.38
0.8 0.38
0.5 1.1
2.81 5.38
2.81 5.38
1.4 3.97
1.43 2.77
6.7 17.1
6.7 17.1
1.4 2.62
27.88 74.46
0.16 0.41
8.3 17.1
8.3 17.1
8.3 17.1
I WC
(*)
60.78
60.78
100
0.48
0.48
10.66
94.87
1.42
1.42
100
3.09
71.43
1.78
1.78
1.78
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
22-FitHia
&-ftb-W
17-DDC-84
29-Har~88
29-*ir-88
3b-66
3l-Mqr«B
SOL-
IN1TY
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
• EFFLUE*^ owutra mrtnnt maaflrfFBTCTirg • — . - -
SPECIFIC
tfflWJC-
TflNCE
(UMHO/CM)
790
790
400
300
300
425
400
400
400
300
500
500
500
HARDNESS
ING/L AS
CdC03)
60
128
sea
194
44
60
60
38
12
65
65
66
ALKALINITY
(N6/L AS
CaCQ3)
90
106
106
151
76
48
48
29
307
184
184
109
pH
(SU)
7.9
7.9
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.6
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.3
9.4
7.0
7.0
6.9
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MB/L)
2
2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.8
1.4
1.4
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NK3
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
)3.6
)3.6
0.2
MINI-
MUM
DO
MG/L)
OR *
SAT.)
87*
91*
7.6
87*
97*
97*
8.1
6.7
86*
7.8
6.6
7.6
90*
91*
97*
1 NPDES t
31 AR 0003018
32 AR 0003018
33 AR 0020338
34 AR 0020702
35 AR 0020702
36 AR 0021211
37 AR 0021733
38 AR 0021750
39 AR 0021750
40 OR 0021792
41 AR 0021806
42 AR 0022624
43 AR 0033278
44 AR 0033278
45 AR 0033278
OUT-
FfU
1
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
USAF-BLYTHEVILLE AFB
BATESVILLE
BATESVILLE
MOUNTAIN HOME
DEDUEEN
FORT SXITM-MASSARD CRK
FORT SNITH-MPBSAHD CRK
BERRYVILLE
LITTLE ROCK-ADAMS FIELD
HDUHET (A.K.A. ALUNA!)
FORT SNITH-P STREET
FORT SNITH-P STREET
FORT SMITH-P STREET
_(. —
!
!
!
1
!
! TEST SPECIES
I
*
1 D.
1 P.
1 D.
1 P.
t D.
1 D.
: D.
! D.
! C.
! D.
! D.
I D.
1 P.
! C.
i P.
PULE!
PRONELAS
PULE!
PROCLAS
PULE!.
PULE!
PULE!
PULE!
AFFINIS
PULE!
PULE!
PULE!
PRONELAS
AFFINIS
PROMELAS
TEST
LENGTH
IN •
— -WLUUll
LC50
IUIILIIT
MORTALITY
Tb Irtfrt
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
2
7
2
a
2
2
2
2
7
2
2
3
7
7
8
18
16 9
8 8
5 4
1.9 1.6
17 14
11
100
56 100
100
93 60
20
10
100
100
16 100
100
100
too
100
a loo
76 70
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
INATED
EFFLUENT
10
5
100
20
0
0
0
eo
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
100 50
100 50
23 10
10 5
10 3
100 50
UJWtHIb
NOTE: CI«93* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
CMKHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
CI: 15-22
CbV»71*
Cl: 12-E5 <24H>t 6-12 (48H>{ CHLOR.{ SOME IND.
ChV*?l*
NO SIS. NDRT.
NO SIB. NORT.
CI: 6-12 (24 i 46H)
Cl: 3-6 (24 t 48H); NOTE NORT. IN DECMLOR.
ChV=16*5 PECHL. 50* EFFL. TESTEDj 6SAPH. INTER.
CI: 1.7-2.1 I24H)| 1.5-1.8 I48H)
CI: 15-20 (24H); 13-15 (48H!; DECHL. NOT TESTED
LC50 IS ft TEH VALUEj NOTE HIGH pH
CW-7*| 30* NORT. IN 10* EFFL.
DiV*7*i GRAPHICALLY INTERPOLATED
ChV*71*
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAN
EFFECTS
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
I
U)
K)
I
-------
| _____ — fM.iLllf/KU_:JVllW NHltn 1-TUIgHUU-
1 NPDESI
46 AR 0033.78
47 (HI 0033375
48 AR 0033373
49 AR 0033375
50 AR 0033373
51 AR 0033373
52 RR 0033375
53 AR 0033375
54 AR 0033353
33 AR 0033766
36 AR 0033766
37 AR 0033766
58 AR 0034321
39 RR 0034321
60 RR 0034321
OUT-
FALL
1
001
00!
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY W*C
FORT SMITH-* STREET
STEEIM FflUTT
STEUJNfl FfttET
STERLING FAUCET
STEHINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
STERLINB FAUCET
ROGERS
PARflfiOUJ
PARAGOULD
PARAGQUU)
HARRISON
HARRISON
HARRISON
SIC
OK
4938
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
3471
4952
4952
4932
4952
4952
4952
4952
LOCATION
(CITY)
FORT S«TH
SHEBIKIN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
SHERIDAN
ROGERS
PARA80ULD
PARAGOULD
PARASOULD
HRRRISON
HARRISON
HARRISON
STREW ROW
(CFS)
(TENTRTIVE)
RECEIVINB HATER NM WW 7010
ARKANSAS RIVER 29628 709
TOM BffiffiH/HljRRlCM C 254 0
TOUN BRflNCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRflNCH/HURRlCae C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICRNE C 254 0
TOM BROCK/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
TOUN BRANCH/HURRICANE C 254 0
OSA6E CREEK 152 12.43
EIGHTNILE CREEK 134 0.1
EI8HTMLE CREEK 134 0. 1
EIBHTNILE CREEK 134 0.1
CROOKED CR£EK 132.12 44
CROOKED CREEK 132.12 44
CROOKED CREEK 132. 12 44
PIPE FLOW
(W»
NEON MAX.
8.3 17.1
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.3 0.4
4.15
1.32 3.65
1.32 3.65
1.32 3.65
1.08 2.05
1.08 2.05
1.08 2.05
IUC
!*>
1.78
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
34.09
95.34
95.34
95.34
3.67
3.67
3.67
SIMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
31-*_r«>
22-Jul-ftS
22-Jul-8S
21-Rpr-86
21-Apr-86
oe-Oct-66
08-Ort-86
25-Jul-87
ll-Sep-84
17-Sep-8S
09-Sep-87
09-Sep-87
05-Hay-B7
05-*-y-B7
05-Nay-87
SAL-
INITY
io/oo)
0
8
2
0
0
2
2
8
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
crruuc
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/00
500
1750
1750
1700
1700
4000
4000
6000
650
600
600
600
850
850
850
jfi rni3iu<
HAf-tCSS
(KG/I AS
C-C03)
66
422
422
560
560
410
410
114
39
107
107
107
L71TCTUUHL
flLKPLINITY
(H6/L AS
CaC03)
109
70
70
53
53
95
95
128
162
134
134
134
.SMfM.
PH
(SU)
6.9
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.7
7.7
7.4
7.1
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.3
7.3
7.3
ItfllDill
TOTAL
RES1D.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/U
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
1.8
1.8
1.8
o "
UN1CN-
UE.
NH3
(«6/L!
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
MN1-
HJN
DO
HB/L)
OR %
SAT.J
87>
9.4
9
7.6
82*
7
88*
81X
7.2
6.6
91 %
7.6
a
93*
!
I
1 NPOES 1
46 AR
47 RR
48 RR
49 RR
SOAR
31 AR
32 RR
S3RR
34 RR
33 RR
56 AR
57 AR
58 HR
39 AR
60 AR
0033278
0033373
0033373
0033375
0033375
0033375
0033373
0033373
0033553
0033766
0033766
0033766
0034321
0034321
0034321
OUT-
rra i
rHu.
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NWC
FORT SNITH-P STREET
STERLING FAUCET
STERL1NB FBUCET
STERLING FAUCET
STERLING FHJCO
STERLING FAUCET
STERLING FAUCET
STERLING FAUCET
R06ERS
PRRAGOULD
POttWJULD
PARAGOULO
HARRISON
HARRISON
HARRISON
I
1
!
I
j
i
! TEST SPECIES
l
! D.
! 9.
1 D.
: D.
I P.
! D.
! P.
1 C.
! D.
! D.
I P.
! D.
POEJ
praams
PULEI
PULEI
PRONELAS
PULEI
PROKLAS
VRRIEBATUS
PULEI
PULEI
PROCLAS
PULEI
! BELENASTIUI
1 D.
1 P.
_— .t __
PULE!
PROMELAS
TEST
LENGTH
TM
DAYS 24H
2
a
2
1
7
1
a
9
1
1
8
2
4
1 (6
8
trrutNi IUIIUIY
LC50 HOUTALITY
tu |iVvf
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
83 75
36 100
20
10
45
5
83 60
54 100
0
0
45
0
(6 95
100
61 100
NORTALITY
IN !00t
DECHLOR-
Tuoirn
irWttv
EFaUENT
0
0
81
0
100
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
SO 25
SO 10
73 50
100 50
100 50
6 (6
50 25
UJifcNIS
NOTE! CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC30
CMWHRON1C VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
Cl:64-100
CI:49-63; OV«35*
BTENTION OF TEST TO 8D-NO SIS. MORTALITY
-
ChV-22*
-
CI 147-100; OiV«61*
OiV«71*; NOTE HIGH SALINITY
-
-
ChV«71<
-
ChV(6*i NOTE EFFECT IN DECHU EFFL.
100* «RT. IN 6-10W EFFL. AFTER 24H
ChV=35*i BRRPHICflLLY ITERPOLATEDj WRT. IN DECH.
POTENTIAL
FOR
TMCTSTflll
ifoincw
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
VES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
I
u>
U)
I
-------
rnfit trwforrvtmur! uftTtro TurnDmATTnu .. — .. „...—,,—.... — - — .„
OUT-
FALL
1 NPDESI * FACILITY NAME
61 AR 0034380 001 STUTT8ART
KW 003*380 001 STUTTWRT
63 AR 0034452 001 UGfi-FORT CHAFFS
64 AR 0034432 001 USA-FORT CHAFFEE
65 AR 0034452 001 USA-FORT CHAFFS
66 AR 0034851 001 PIPER INDUSTRIES
67 AR 0033386 002 ARKANSAS EASTMAN
68 AR 0033645 001 6LENUOOD
69 AR 0035645 001 ELENUOOD
70 AR 0033643 001 6LENUOOD
71 RR 0036412 002 VERTAC
72 AR 0036332 001 BEKflERT STEEL HIRE
73 RR 0036532 001 BEKflERT STEa HIRE
74 AR 0037770 002 CPS CHEMICAL
75 AR 0037770 002 CPS CHEMICAL
CfP
SIC
CODE
4952
43K
9711
9711
9711
34%
2869
4932
4952
4952
2819
3313
3313
2869
2869
i fvoTtnu
LULHTiVt
(CITY)
STUTTGART
STUTTWT
FORT CHAFFEE
FORT CHAFFEE
FORT CHAFFEE
CLARENDON
BATEBV1LLE
GLENUOOD
GLENUOOD
BLENUOOD
UEST HELENA
VAN BUREN
VANBUREN
UEST MEMPHIS
UEST MEMPHIS
STREAM aOM
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
RECEIVING UATER NAME MEAN 7010
KINGS BAYOU
KINGS wraj
LITTLE VHCHE ESASSE
LITTLE VACHE SRASSE
LITTLE VACHE GRASSE
UNITE RIVER
UHITE RIVER
CADDQ RIVER
CADOO RIVER
CADDQ RIVER
BEAR C. TO MISS. R.
ARKANSAS RIVER
ARKANSAS RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
257.22 0.72
S7.2 0.7E
CTK 178.5 20.37
CRK 178.5 20.37
CRK 178.5 20.37
30267 4829
12600 90S
5 0
5 0
5 0
484387 103334
30206 616.7
30206 816.7
470057 69646
470057 69646
PIPE am
(NSD)
ICAN MAI.
1.71 4.69
1.71 4.69
1.26 2.63
1.26 2.63
1.06 2.83
0.013 0.025
1.2 1.9
0.22 0.3
0.22 0.5
0.22 0.5
0.04 0.07
0.074 0.252
0.074 0.252
0.037 0.067
0.037 0.067
jyp
IM*
!*)
78.64
78.64
8.74
8.74
8.74
0.0004
0.21
100
100
100
0.0006
0.014
0.014
0.0001
0.0001
SAMPLE
DATE
!9-Oct-87
19-Oct-87
27-Att5~85
31-Hay-68
31-Miy-68
29-Jul-«6
20-A»g-86
2!-Jul-«7
21-Jnl-87
2i-Jul-87
05-NOV-85
22-AUJ-84
21-May-€5
27-Mar-84
18~Dec-84
froiFwr DHWira /rwmra nj«MrTF»T
-------
t NPDESI
76 AR 0037770
77 flR 0037800
78 OR 0038512
79 AR 0041203
BO AR 0041211
61 AR 0041220
!
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY MR*
002 CPSOOICAL
009 EJGCQ
001 VERTfC
009 REYNOLDS HETRLS
001 REYNOLDS NETALS
007 REYNOLDS METALS
SIC
era
2869
286.3
2BE5
1091
1051
1091
(CITY)
ICST MEMPHIS
RDOfflOO
JflCXSONVILLE
BAUXITE
BBUIITE
BAUXITE
RECEiVlNB MATER NAME
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
TR1B, TO BOGGY CREEK
ROCKY BRANCH CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
COLD SPR1N6 BRANCH
FOURCHE BAYOU
STREIWROW
(CFsi PIPE aw
(TCNTfiTIVE) (H3»
MEAN 7Q10 KAN MAI.
470057 69646 0.037 0.067
58.1 1.14 0.24 4.6?
0 0.13 0.61
0 E.9 3.1
0.03
SWIPU-
!*) DATE
0.0001 09-Dec-BE
24.5 I7-«pr-84
100 S8-N0V-84
19-Nov-gS
100 19-NW85
19-NOV-65
EFFLUENT PHYSICS' ""Wfxtraf ruoBflrrFBHrrin!
SflL-
(0/00 I
10
0
0
SPECIFIC
CON0UC-
(iwo/cm
laooo
450
1500
1400
700
HARDNESS
CaCtB!
52
95
299
190
161
ALKflLINITY
CaC03; (SU)
7.9
K B.1
110 6.3
a 7.3
27 7.6
H 6.9
TOTPJL
RESID. UN10N-
CW.OR- I ZED
(ME/L) (MBA)
!0. 1 0.7
HINI-
PU1
DO
M6/L)
25*
3
8.3
8. 2
fi.2
8.9
1
!
[
!
I
.
: i WOES i
1 76 flS
! 77 flR
! 78 OR
! 79 flR
1 80 RR
t 81 AR
0037770
0037600
0038318
0041303
0041811
0041220
OUT-
1
002
009
001
009
001
007
RCILITY
NMC
cpsocnca
DSCO
VERTflC
REYNOJS
REYNOLDS
REYNOLDS
ICTMJ
ICTflLS
lETOLS
!
i
1
I
I TEST SPECIES
1 C.
! D.
I 0.
! D.
! D.
: D.
VRRIEEATUS
PULEX
van
PULEI
PULEX
PULEX
U-HUtNI IHIUHY
TEST
LENGTH LCSO MQRTPLITY
DAYS 24H 46H CHRONIC EFFU£NT
8 2 100
1 5
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
WRTftUTY
IN 100*
DECH.DR-
EFFLUENT
10
0
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LQEC NQEC
1 (1
OTPENTS
MOTE: C1=9H CONFIDENCE INTERVOL (SOUND LCSO
ChV*CHRONIC VflUIE IN PERCENT EFRIENT
ChVd; HIGHLY TOXIC (AERATED AND UNAERATED)
-
-
-
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
HO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
I
GO
tn
-------
OUT-
FOU.
1 NPDES 1 1 FflClLlTf IWC
1 LA 0000183 001 HEYWLD6 ICTMJ
2 Lfl 000019! Ml t*IW CflWIK
3 LA 0000191 001 1*1* CflfffllK
* LA 0000191 001 UNION CSffllDE
5 LA 0000881 001 KKDBI DOHCH.
6 LA 0000493 001 ffilCHHDLD OOIOL
7 LA 0000493 001 REIDMO OO-1CPL
B LA 0000493 001 DEtOMU) CHEWCM.
9 LA 0000604 001 COLOMflL SL6BR
10 LA 0000604 00? OL0HAL SUB*
it LA ooooTX ooi uMKjm. 00101. ea.
12 LA 0000732 001 l*!TOrflL OCXIOl. CO.
13 LA 0000752 001 UNIDBWL OCMCSL CO.
14 LA 0000761 OOI PP6
IS LA 0000761 001 PP6
SIC
ODE
am
*i
£969
2869
2B69
8861
2861
2861
3062
«f£
282
2822
2822
2812
asi2
UEHTION
term
BPTON KUJBE
HMWILLE
NRHWILU
HfHWILLE
6EISWR
OflKBU
OflKOfU
OflKWLE
8S*CCY
E»wen
6E1SNIW
6EISKW
SEISNRR
LAX OttfLES
LAKE CHSIES
RECEiVIl* MKBI MM
TO. TO BATON ROUGE ».
MSSISIWI Bra
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI iIWi
PlISSISSIPPI RIVER
CPLCflSIEU RIVER
CflLCflSIfU RIVER
oicasiaj RIVCT
S»W TP OLONld CflWL
SUWP TP QLQNlflL 0)Mt
•ISSISSIPP! f)!VEI
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BCYOI D' INK
BAYOU D'INK
S7BEPK ROW
(CFS)
(TamrrivE)
tew mo
31 6
*MOOO 1!1'»5
460000 H1000
460000 111000
460000 111000
518 27
918 27
9!8 47
84 JO
B4 10
460000 111000
4MOM 111000
4600&0 111000
0
0
PIPE FUJM
(ffiD!
icm MU.
1.S4 3.SS
1.63 L54
1.63 £.54
1.63 &S4
1.63 Z.S4
0,13 0.3
0.13 0.3
0.15 0.3
8,97 10,5
0.07 0.11
0.53 1.04
0.53 1.04
0.53 1.04
200 300
£00 300
INC
W
32.22
0.0«3
0.0(^3
0.0023
O.OC23
0.85
0.85
0.§5
47
1.67
0.0007
6.0007
0.0007
100
100
SW.E
OUJECT1W
MTC
??-Oct-«5
SWw-54
19-J«n-«4
05-to~ft5
18-»tor-86
09-flpr-86
C&-Dee-66
05-D«c-66
!8-«br-«6
It-lbr-K
ll-flif-87
i!-ft«|~§7
U-fl«J-fl7
^9-Fe&-84
29-f«b-84
FFH irtn BHWICH /D*KICHL
SflL-
INITT
(8/00)
0
4
4
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
1
SPECIFIC
CtJWMJC-
TflMI
(UM/cm
500
4700
«7M
SOO
14SO
1700
700
7M
9M
500
WO
590
390
4100
4100
WMHCSS
(ISA. flS
MU3)
4?
60
60
78
233
WO
36
36
15!
132
&4
64
64
19*
194
CHRffiDERISTICS
OUWUNITY
(N5/L flS
CaflB)
93
)600
)600
>600
114
158
203
203
123
62
0
0
0
72
72
f«
ISU)
7.8
7.6
7.6
7.7
7.6
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.3
7
4.3
4.3
4.3
7.1
7.1
TOTSl
RES1C.
CHLUt-
II*
(M6/U
<0.1
(0.1
(0.1
W.1
«L1
(0.1
UNION-
IZCO
tta
(KfU
0.1
J0.1
(0.1
2.1
«.J
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
HM1-
)W
00
(HB/L
m %
SST.)
a.4
4.Z
6.3
6.2
8.9
2.S
6.2
7»
7. a
4.8
87*
7.7
7.8
9.6
OUT-
rfli i
r»*-L
« NPDES 1 1 FACILITY MHC
1 LA 0000163 001 REYNOLDS ICTUS
2 LA 0000191 001 UNION CflRSIDE
3 LA 0000191 001 WltM OWE IDE
4 LA 0000191 001 WION CARBIDE
5 LA 0000281 001 BGRKN OCtlCd
6 LA 0000493 001 IC10MU OOlCflL
7 LA 0000493 001 RElDfCLD DO1CH.
8 LA 0000493 001 REIOML& OCHICa
9 LA 0000604 001 COLONIAL SU8W
10 LA 0000604 002 OLSMlfL SUGM
11 LA 0000752 001 LKlBCTflL OO1CBL CO.
12 LA 0000752 001 IMIROm OO!CflL CO.
13 LA 0000752 001 IMMnML DtHlCflL CO.
14 LA 0000761 001 PPG
15 LA 0000761 001 PPS
—~!
;
1
I
|
1
1 TEST SPECIES
[
t D. PULEI
! P. PRKUS
: o. fan
! D. PULEI
! D. (UJEI
: D. PULB
: D. PUL£I
! P. PROCLAS
! D. PJUI
I D. PULO
! P. PSOCLAS
i sRBnsnuK
; D. PULO
t B. PULEX
; p. PUCLAS
TEST
LENGTH
DAYS <
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
8
1
2
8
4
2
1
1
^JTlUCm lUill-tlT
CHRONIC
WRTflUTY EFTECT flS
IN 100X PERCENT
LC50 WRTBLITY DEOtOR- EFaUEKT
24H 48H DWNIC EFaLCKT EFaLENT LOEC NOEC
5 0
100
16 12 100
18 10 100 100
0 0
31 (1 100
73 80
13 100 25 10
5
43 43 100
(K 100 «25 <25
!& 100 C6 (6
33 5 !00
0
5
NOTES: C1=9S* CWiDEICE INTERVAL (WOUND LC50
CMKHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
-
LC50 NOT CfiLCULABLEi 100« KHT. IN 10* EFR.
SALINITY OWKt NOT MM
C!: 9-11(24 1 40H!; NCTE HIGH CWD./flLX.
-
CI: 38-38 K4H){ TOT. IN 0ILUTIf»S U/ SfiTISFflCTORY DO
Cli64-83
ov=m
-
Cl: 37-51(24 1 48H)j OiOKIIC WT »Baj«B
ChVC5»; NOTE LO* (H
DiV<6Xj NOTE LOM oH
HISW.Y TOISC; «JTE LOM pM
-
-
POTENTIW.
FOR
IbjCTOCm
llOlnUn
EFFECTS
NO DCUTE
NO flCUTE
NO fiOfTE
NO flCUTE
NO flCUTE
YB (CUTE
NO CmONlC
NO CW»!C
NO fiCUTE
W OWE
NO CHfiONIC
W D.WH1C
NO IOJTE
* (CUTE
ND
I
u>
CTl
I
-------
1
1 NPOES 1
16 LA 0000841
17 Lfl 0000941
IB Lfl 0000641
19 LA 0000641
HO LA 0000868
21 LA 0000876
22 Lfl 0000676
23 LA 0000914
24 LA 0001333
25 LA 0002771
86 LA 0008780
27 LA 0002909
28 LA 0002917
29 LA 0002933
30 LA 0008933
__ ~— — — —
FACILITY/RECEIVING MATER INFORMRTIGN
DUT-
FAU.
1
001
001
001
001
001
002
002
001
001
008
001
007
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
EXXON CORP.
mm ow.
EXXON CORP.
EXXON CORP.
leSTVACO
KAISER ALUMINUM
KAISER AUMNUH
COPOLYMER t CHEMICAL
H. R. BRACE ( CO.
E. I. DUPONT
E. I. DUPONT
KAISER ALUMINUM
S.U. ELECTRIC POWER
VULCAN MATERIALS
VULCAN MATERIALS
SIC
CODE
8881
2821
2621
2821
2661
3334
3334
2822
2819
2819
2819
2819
4911
2869
8869
LOCATION
(CITY)
BATON ROUSE
BflTON ROUGE
BATON ROUGE
BATON ROUSE
DERIDDER
CHALNETTE
DfUCTTE
BATON ROUSE
LAKE CHARLES
BURNSIDE
P1NEVILLE
BATON ROUGE
MOORINBSPORT
6EISMAR
6EISMAR
RECEIVING URTER NAME
CYPRESS BAYOU
CYPRESS BflYOU
CYPRESS BAYOU
CYPRESS BAYOU
PALMETTO CREEK
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MONTE SAND BAYOU
CAICASIEU RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
TR. TO FLASON BAYOU
MONTE SAND BAYOU
CADDO LAKE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE ROW
(TENTATIVE) (MED! SAMPLE
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX. (*> DATE
556 46 0.2 0.28 0.67 05-H»i-85
SX 46 0.2 0.28 0.67 03- Doc- 66
556 46 0.2 0.88 0.67 03-Dec-86
556 46 0.2 0.28 0.67 03-Dec-86
371 21 0.91 3.86 6.e9 05-Feb-85
460000 1 11000 3.01 18.77 0.0042 26-feb-86
460000 111000 3.01 18.77 0.0042 26-f»b-86
34 4 2.43 3.57 48.52 OS-Jun-BS
4416 259 1.95 3.56 1.15 08-Apr-86
460000111000 0.05 0.170.00007 29-Apr-86
00 100 ll-Sep-85
34 4 0.01 1.56 0.4 19-*ar-B5
124.3 268.4 25-fet>-86
460000 111000 1.13 2.11 0.0016 2S-Oet-83
460000 111000 1.13 2.11 0.0016 23-Af>r-65
— EFFLUEKT PHY.S1CAL/QCMICJ3L
SAL-
INITY
lo/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
4
0
0
58
74
SPECIFIC
COBUC-
TflNCE
(UMHO/Cm
500
450
450
450
350
2600
2600
400
8000
590
135
76000
76000
HfiRW£SS
(H6/L AS
CaC03)
24
44
44
44
28
397
397
40
124
37
16
CHfSOCTEIHSnCG -
ALKALINITY
(W/L BS
CaC03)
119
76
76
76
34
384
324
51
54
34
14
PH
(SU)
8.3
8.5
8.5
8.5
6.9
7.7
7.7
7.5
7.3
8.1
a
6.4
7.2
7.6
7.6
TOTBL
RESIO. UN1DN-
CH,QR- I ZED
INC M13
(MB/I) (M6/L)
(0.1 0.8
(0.1 0.8
(0.1 0.8
(0. 1 (0. 1
2
NINI-
«*i
DO
(W/L
OR *
SAT.)
B.4
eft
75*
7
S.6
90*
8.2
8.4
92*
8.4
8.2
8.6
8
7.9
I
U)
!
OUT-
Era i
rwj.
1 NPOES 1 I FACILITY NAME
16 LA 0000641 001 EXXON CORP.
17 LA 0000641 001 EXXON CORP.
18 LA 0000641 001 EXXON CORP.
19 LA 0000641 001 EXXON CORP.
20 LA 0000666 001 tCSTVACO
21 LA 0000876 002 KAISER AUJNINUM
22 LA 0000876 002 KAISER ALUMINUM
23 LA 0000914 001 COPOLYNER 1 CHEMICAL
24 LA 0001333 001 W. R. BRACE 1 CO.
25 LA 0002771 002 E. I. DUPONT
36 LA 0002780 001 E.I DUPONT
27 LA 0008909 007 KAISER ALUMINUM
28 LA 0002917 001 S.U. ELECTRIC POUER
a LA 0002933 001 VULCAN MATERIALS
30 LA 0008333 001 VULCflN MATERIALS
; O-hLUtNl IUJ1LIIY
CHRONIC
! MORTH.ITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
' LENBTH LC50 MDRTdlTY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEX 2 86 26 100 100
P. PROCLRS 8 60 70 30 25
CEfUOOAPHNlA 7 10
D. PULEX 2 81 47 100
D. PULEX .1 00
P. PROMELAS 7 0
D. PULEX 1 0 5
D. PULE! 1 0 0
C. VRRIEBATUS 8 100 SO 10
D. PULEX 2 50 28 100
D. PULEX 1 0 0
D. PULEI 1 0 0
D. PULEI 2 89 88 60 30
N. BAHIA 25 100
N. BAHIA z it 7 too
uwtNre
NOTES: C1«9S* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
CMMMBNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
-
ChV-35*; CU41-93
NOS1G. EFFECT
Cl:69-94(24H)j 39-57I48H)
-
-
-
-
ChV»22*j NO SIB. WRT. IN SALINITY CONTROL
CI:39-64(84H)| 20-39(48H)i HORT. IN SflLINlTY CNTRL
-
-
CI: 71-100 (24H>i 80-100 (48H)
SflLINlTY CONTROL NOT RUN
C!:4-i2(4aW! 100* NORT. IN 46 1 74 o/oo CONTROLS
POTENTIAi
FOR
furnxrnM
JPQInOW
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
M> CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
ND ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO (CUTE
YES SCUTE
NO BOJTE
NO flCUTE
-------
* NPDESI
31 LA 0003026
32 LA 0003026
33 LA 0003271
34 LA 0003271
35 LA 0003301
36 LA 0003301
37 LA 0003301
38 LA 0003301
39 LA 0003301
40 LA 0003301
41 LA 0003301
42 LA 0003301
43 LA 0003301
44 LA 0003301
45 LA 0003301
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NAME
001 COOCO REFINERY
001 CONOCO REFINERY
001 MORTON THIOKOL
001 NORTON THIOKOL
521 DOU CHEMICAL
321 DOM CHEMICAL
521 DOU CHEMICAL
511 DOU CHEMICAL
511 DOU CHEMICAL
001 DOU CHEMICAL
001 DOU CHEMICAL
001 DOU CHEMICAL
321 DOU CHEMICAL
2001 DOU CHEMICAL
511 DOU CHEMICAL
— — — — — H*.1LI IT/KtLtlVlHj (WICK 1WUWWIIUB-
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVINB UATER NAME
atl LAKE CHARLES BAYOU VERDINE
2911 LAKE CHARLES BAYOU VERDINE
2819 WEEKS ISLAND GULF INTRACOASTAL UU
2819 WEEKS ISLAND GULF INTRACOASTAL UU
2869 PLAOUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAOUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAQUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAQUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAOUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAOUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLABUEN!* MISSISSIPPI RIVED
2869 PLAOUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAOUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAQUEMINE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
2869 PLAOUEMIttE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
STREAM ROW
(D-S) PIPE FLOW
(TENTATIVE) (MED)
MEAN 7Q10 NEON MAX.
0 1.83 3.44
0 1.83 3.44
994 108 4.98 23.1
994 108 4.97 8.39
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 11:000
460000 111000 1.62 107
460000 111000 1.62 3.07
460000 111000 1.62 3.07
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
SAMPLE
TUT Pfll 1 FTTTfU
Im* UULL&L 1 1VJ1
«) DATE
100 a-Feb-84
100 29-feb-84
6.67 06-flflr-85
6.66 !4-fluS-86
15-Jul-87
15-Jul-«7
15-JuI-87
!5-Jul-87
15-Jgl-87
0.0023 15-Jul-87
0.0023 15-Jal-87
0.0023 15-Jul-B7
15-Jul-87
15-JuI-87
15-Jul-87
— -""•'"—""""""" " """c/Tk.UEHi rnTa,it*»./i*nci1ui-»». LTtinMLicnisi iwo
sa-
TNfTV
ini 1 1
(o/oo)
0
0
4
q
4
2
4
2
2
3
2
2
2
65
2
SPECIFIC
raaxjc-
TflNfTT
IHHLlL
(UMHO/CM)
£700
2700
7500
12000
6000
2600
6000
1700
1700
3700
3700
3700
2600
1700
HARDNESS
fMR/l IX
InW/L Ha
£20
220
90
440
90
100
100
210
210
210
440
100
ALKALINITY
CaC03)
156
156
738
67
738
90
90
97
97
97
67
90
(SU)
7,£
7.2
8.2
7.7
9.1
7.8
9.1
10.4
10.4
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.8
a
10.4
TOTflL
RESID.
CH.OR-
(M6/L)
(0.1
1
(0.1
1
(0.1
SO. I
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
UNION- DO
I ZED (MG/L
ULTt fJQ *
ntto UM P
(MB/U SflT. J
6.6
S.8
B.b
(0. 93X
(0.
(0. 8
(0. 7
(0.
(0. 91*
(0. 8.1
(0.
(0, 93*
(0. 90*
(0. 81*
(0. 8.2
I
U)
oo
I
OUT-
Ctt 1
rflLL
1 NPDB • 1 FACILITY NAME
31 LA 0003026 00! CONDCO REFINERY
32 LA 0003026 001 CONOCO REFINERY
33 LA 0003271 001 MORTON TH10KDL
34 LA 0003271 001 NORTON THIOKO.
35 LA 0003301 521 DOU OCMICflL
36 LA 0003301 32! DOU DCMICAL
37 LA 0003301 521 DOU DOICflL
38 LA 0003301 Sll DOU DCMICAL
39 LA 0003301 Sll DOU CHEMICAL
40 LA 0003301 001 DGU CHEMICAL
41 LA 0003301 001 DON CHEMICAL
42 LA 0003301 001 DOM CHEMICAL
43 LA 0003301 321 DOM CHEMICAL
44 LA 0003301 2001 DOU CHEMICAL
45 LA 0003301 Sll DOU CHEMICAL
U-FLUtNT lOIlCITY
CHRONIC
MORALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFRUENT
Witt t/VW IMflTTtt m .in- in i . _
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFRUENT ET FLUENT LOEC NOEC
P. PROMEIAS 1 5
D. PUL0 1 0
D. PUB 2 66 59 100 100
C. VORIE6ATUS 7 5
SELENRSTRUM 4 48 18 (12 (12
D. PULE) 2 5
D. PULEX 1 (12 100 100
SaENASTRUM 4 34 100 50
P. PRMLftS 8 20
D. PULO 2 10
SELENRSTRUM 4 12 100 50
P. PROMELAS S 20
P. PRONELAS 8 IS
C. VBRIESATUS 9 33 100 50 25
D. PULEI 2 5
Owens
NOTES: CI<95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
OiVKHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
-
-
C1:60~72(24M»; 52-68(48H>j 100* lORT. IN 4 o/oo
-
ChV(12*; CELL NO. SIS. LOWER IN DECHL EFR.
-
HIGHLY TOXIC; NOTE MORT. IN DECHU EFFL.
ChV-71*
NO SIB. EFFECT
-
QiV-71*; SLIBHT EFfECT
NO SIB. EFFECT
NO SIC. EFFECT
CHv*35*; ADEQUATE SURVIVAL IN 65 o/oo CONTROL
-
POTENTia
FOR
TUCTDC2W
InalKcW
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO flCUTE
NO flCUTE
NO CHROMIC
NO CHRONIC
NO flCUTE
NO CHOTNIC
NO CHRWIIC
NO CHR»1C
NO CHRONIC
NO (CUTE
-------
._ PRLlLIIY/KtlilVlNb WHIM IWUmHIlUI
OUT-
FALL
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
46 LA 0003301 321 DOU CHEMICAL
47100003301 311 D» 0€WOL
48 LA 0003476 091 VISTA CHEMICAL
49 LA 0003582 001 SHELL OIL CO.
50 LA 0003549 002 USA-LOU. ARMY AMMO, PLT
51 LA 0003549 002 USA-LOU. ARMY AWUN, PLT
52 Lfl 0003549 005 USA-LOU. HRflY AMMO. PLT
53 Lfl 0003549 005 USft-LOU. ARMY (WO. PLT
54 Lfl 0003654 002 ZAPATA HBYN1E
55 Lfl 0003689 001 H1MONT-HERCULES
56 Lfl 0003689 001 HIMONT-HESCULES
57 Lfl 0003735 007 LAKE CHARLES CftRKJN
58 Lfi 0003733 007 LAKE CHARLES CARBON
59 Lfl 0003824 001 FIRESTONE
60 Lfl 0003824 001 FIRESTONE
SIC
CODE
2869
2869
2869
2911
3483
3483
3483
3483
2077
2821
2821
3334
3334
2822
2822
LOCATION
(CITY)
PLAOUENINE
nuoonc
NESTLAKE
NORCO
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
CAMERON
CflMER»
CANERON
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
RECEIVIN6 MATER NAK
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
K1SSISSIPPI BMR
DITCH TO BfiYOU VERDI*
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BOONE CREEK
800NE CREEK
BOONE CREEK
BOOK CREEK
COLCftSIEU SHIP CHANNEL
CALCflSIEU SHIP CHANNEL
CALCaSIHJ SHIP CHANNEL
CALCflSIEU RIVER
CflLCASIEU RIVER
BflYOU d'INDE
BAYOU d1 INDE
STREAM FLDU
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7310
460000 111000
4WOOO 11 1000
0
460000 111000
1132 1.06
1132 1
1132 1.06
1132 1.06
5346 262
4341 260
4581 260
4416 259
4416 259
300 0
300 0
PIPE aow
(MED)
MEAN MAX.
0.71 1.33
0.13 0.35
0.04 0.07
0.04 0.07
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01
0.1
1.56 ?. 71
1.56 2.71
0.3 1.01
0.3 1.01
0.8 2.2
0.8 2.2
IMC
(*)
100
0.00018
5.53
5. 84
1.4
1.4
0.059
0.92
0.92
0.18
0.18
100
100
SfiNPLE
COLLECTION
DflTE
15-Jul-87
15-Jul-fl7
ffi-Jan-86
30-flpr-85
05-Nov-84
14-Kay-fi6
29-Feb-88
ffl-feb-88
15-ftpr-«6
04-«ar-B6
04-*ar-86
21-flpr-66
21-flpr-86
16-Feb-BB
16-feb-B8
'""•
SflL-
1NITY
!o/oo!
2
SO
0
2
4
0
0
5
3
3
0
0
0
0
Lmucni KmDiurc./Lno'uu**.
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UWO/CM)
2600
2350
1300
2900
6900
750
750
10000
600
600
600
600
990
990
HARWESS
(KG/L flS
CaOB!
440
794
188
728
1260
1636
69
69
146
14S
HJWLINITy
(ME/L AS
CaC03)
67
115
104
24
137
270
743
743
146
146
PH
(SU)
7.8
8.9
7.2
7.7
7.7
6.7
7.5
7.5
8.8
8.4
8.4
7.9
7.9
7.5
7.5
TOTSL
RESID.
CH.GR-
if€
(ten.}
!0.1
(0.1
<0.1
(0.1
<0.1
0.1
e.4
8.4
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
WO
(MB/U
(0.1
<0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
1.4
1.4
0.2
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
«N$-
NUM
DO
(HS/L
OR %
SAT.)
9»
87*
7.2
8.8
7.8
66%
98K
m
9W
7.4
7.6
93*
94*
94*
« NPDES 1
46 Lfl 0003301
47 LA 0003301
48 LA 0003476
49 Lfl 0003522
50 Lfl 0003549
51 Lfl 0003549
52 Lfl 0003549
53 Lfl 0003549
54 LA 0003654
55 LA 0003689
56 Lfl 0003689
57 Lfl 0003733
56 Lfl 0003733
59 LA 0003824
60 LA 0003824
OUT-
__. .
1
321
311
001
001
002
002
005
005
002
001
001
007
007
001
001
FACILITY NAME
DOU CHEMICAL
DOU CHEMICAL
VISTA CHEMICAL
SHELL OIL CO.
USA-LOU. ARMY MM.
USA-LOU. ARMY ANNUM.
USA-LOU. RRMY AMMO.
USA-LOU. ARMY AMMO.
ZAPATA HAVNIE
HIMONT-HERCULES
HIMONT-HERCULES
LAKE CHARLES CARBON
LAKE CHARLES CARSON
FIRESTONE
FIRESTONE
1
!
i
I
I
I TEST SPECIES
! SELENASrajN
! C. VARIEBATUS
1 P. PROMELAS
! 0. PULEI
PLT 1 0. PULEI
PLT ! D. PULEI
PLT ! P. PROMELAS
PLT ! D. PULEI
! P. PROMELAS
! P. PROMELAS
! D. PULEI
! D. PULEI
t P. PRONELAS
! D. PULEX
, P. PRW1OAS
U
TEST
LEN6TH
Til
in — — .
DAYS 24H
4
9
7
1
1
1 45
8
2
7
7
1 71
1
7
2
a
-KLUtWI 1UIIUIT
LC50 MORTALITY
f 11 I A/tW
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
45
66 100
10
0
0
95
23 100
15
40
87 55
100
5
10
30
10
CHRONIC
WRTflLITY EFFECT flS
IN 100* PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
1 itATfn
EFRUENT LDEC NOEC
(12 (12
100 50
0
25 12
100 50
100 50
90
NOTES: CI=95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
CMMHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
CWU2*
ChV«71*
NO SIGNIFICANT MORTALITY
-
-
COMPLETE MORTALITY IN 4o/oo CONTROL
ChV*17*; NOTE DIFFERENCE FROM DflPHNIA RESPONSE
NOTE DIFFERENCE UITH FATHEAD M1NNOU RESPONSE
ChV=71»; ftDEGUATE SURVIVAL IN SALINITY CONTROL
ChV=71*; SflLlNITY CONTROL flND OECHL NOT TESTED
SALINITY CONTROL AND DECRORINflTEB NOT TESTED
-
MOOT. IN 50* ETFL, PROB. DUE TO INFERT. EGGS
SI5. MORT. IN 100* EFFL.
NO SIG. EFFECT
POTENTIAL
FOR
TU£TOCT)U
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO SCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
I
U!
-------
-THLILllT/KCLe
Vil«l l«ltR IPfUWUHlW
STREAM RDU
1 NPDES t
61 LA 0004057
62 Lfl 000*090
63 Lfl 0004154
64 LA 0004154
65 LA 0004464
66 LA 0004847
67 LA 0005258
66 Lfl 0005258
69 LA 0005266
70 LA 0005347
71 Lfl 0005355
72 LA 0005461
73 LA 0005487
74 LA 0005941
75 LA 0005941
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NAME
001 BRANT CHEMICAL
001 PTHYLCORP.
001 COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
001 COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
001 SCHUYKILL METALS
001 FREEPORT CHEMICAL
001 BEOR6IA PACIFIC
001 KOREJfl PACIFIC
001 MONSANTO
ooi aw co.
001 EXXON
001 6ENERAL ELECTRIC
001 CIBA-GEISY
003 CITCO CITIES SERVICE
003 CITCO CITIES SERVICE
SIC
CODE
2869
8869
2833
2895
3332
£874
2611
2611
2869
2869
2821
3612
2879
2911
2911
1 WftTTflV
LOUfTItn
(CITY)
LAKE CHARLES
BflTON ROUGE
FRANKLIN
FWNKLIN
E. BATON ROUSE
UNCLE SAM
ZACHAHY
ZACHRRY
LLJLING
LAKE CHARLES
BATON ROUSE
SHREVEPQRT
SAINT BflBRia
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
(CFS)
PIPE ROU
(TENTflTIVE) (MED)
ntr*
RECEIV1NB WTER NAM£
DITCH TO BATON ROUGE B.
WNTE SMI BflYOU
INTRACOASTAL HATESWSY
INTRACOASTAL WTERUAY
BATON ROUGE BflYOU
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
FORTUNE BAYOU
BOGGY BAYOU
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
MEAN
51
316
50.9
460000
460000
460000
460000
4416
15
46
460000
4416
4416
7010 MEAN MAI.
6.62 17.7 27.1
4.1 7.76 14.4
1.4 1.8
1.4 1.8
0 0.27 2.08
111000 144 192
11100024.65 44.2
111000 24.65 44.2
111000 0.12 0.36
259 2.16 3.81
2 1.13 2.95
0
111000 3.3 11.9
259 38 150
259 38 150
im*
!*)
82.05
80. 55
100
0.2
0.034
0.034
0.00017
1.28
46.67
0.005
18.53
18.53
SAMPLE
DATE
18-M*-86
17-Sep-85
27-flii9-87
27-fiug~87
20-flu9-85
15-flpr-B4
ll-ftuj-a?
l!-ftug-87
Ol-Nov-83
18-Jtm-K
OB-Jul-85
08-Atig-B4
02-Feb-88
04-Har-a6
OWtar-86
SAL-
TMfTV
1WI f I
(o/oo)
4
2
2
0
3
3
6
0
15
£
2
nrrmc
spEcrric
CONDUC-
(UW/CN)
9000
750
4200
4200
4000
900
2750
2750
750
390
6500
6500
ni pmsiUM
HARDNESS
CaC03>
112
73
214
214
126
144
400
400
40
64
ice
102
L/ircmurft. i
ALKALINITY
IMC /I QC
Inb/L Mb
DitXB)
203
111
104
104
124
(40
198
198
180
25
95
95
.mam.
1SU)
7.8
7,6
7.5
7.5
9
2.9
7.5
7.5
7.4
8.2
6.7
6.9
7.7
7.7
ttuauua
TOTAL
RES ID.
CHLOR-
(MB/LI
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
tiyj
FtrtS
(HG/L)
2.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
(0.1
0.3
13.6
)3.6
MINI-
MUM
DO
IWS/L
no <
UH *
SOT.)
5.1
7.4
92*
8.4
8.2
8.2
62*
7.4
67*
6.2
6.6
90*
87*
7.8
I
OUT-
cot i
rnUL.
1 NPOES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
61 LA 0004057 001 BRANT CHEMICAL
62 LA 0004090 001 ETHYL COUP.
63 LA 0004154 001 COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
64 LA 0004154 001 COLUMBIAN CHEMICAL
65 LA 0004464 001 SCHUYKILL METALS
66 LA 0004647 001 FREEPORT CHEMICAL
67 LA 0005258 001 GEORGIA PACIFIC
68 LA 0005256 001 BEDR6IB PACIFIC
69 LA 0005266 001 MONSANTO
70 LA 0005347 001 OL1N CO.
71 LA 0005353 001 EXXON
72 LA 0005461 001 GENERAL ELECTRIC
73 Lfl 0005487 001 CI8A-6E16Y
74 LA 0005941 003 CITCO CITIES SERVICE
75 LA 0005941 003 CITCO CITIES SERVICE
. , , .I n I,,
• "• - UTlUtHI IWUUIT —
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFRUENT
TW , _,.,•,»,. TU IrtfW fUDTTH
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFRUENT EFRUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEI 2 71 71
D. PULEI 1 100 SO 20
P. PROMELAS 8 5
D. PULEI 2 15
D. PULEI 1 0 0
D. PULEI 2 13 10 100 100
P. PROHELAS 4 57 100 100 50
D. PULEI 2 5
D. PULEI 2 0
C. VAR1E6ATU5 6 25 100 75
D. PULEI 2 00
D. PULEI 1 0
C. VfiRIEGATUS 9 54 100 100 50
P. PROMELAS 7 25 25 SO
D. PULEI 1 81 65 80
-uroitn i a
NOTESi Ci«95X CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
OiV-CHRDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
COMPLETE MORTALITY IN 4 o/oo SALINITY CONTROL
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
-
-
CI: 12-16I24W; 7-12(48H)i NOTE LOW pH
D»V=71«; NOTE HIGH TOTAL AND UNIONIZED NH3
NOTE HISH TOTAL WiD UNIONIZED NH3
-
ChV*fl7*; NO MORT. IN SAL. CONTROL! IMC DVERfST,
-
-
ChV=71>
ChV*16«; Cl:17-36( NOTE H1BH W3
Cl: 65-100; NOTE HISH NH3
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
ThlCTOCAM
EFFECTS
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
ND ACUTE
m ACUTE
NO ACUTE
H3 CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO fCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO BCUTE
NO fiCUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
« flCUTE
o
I
-------
f-iv»ti fTw/nrrcfutkic unitra tucnOMOTtrmi : : ™— __~™, — — — _ — .
™™» , . — -n. • ••-.'••'."...I ' " -f HLiLl ' T/fiLi»clv*po l*lit« inruwwi mi-""1™
t NPDES 1
76 Lfl 0005983
77 LA 0005963
78 Lfl 0005991
79 Lfl 0005991
80 Lfl 0006041
81 Lfl 000604 1
8? Lfl 0006131
83 LA 0006131
84 Lfl 0006131
85 LA 0006131
SS Lfl 000683!
87 LA 0006831
38 Lfl 0006831
89 LA 0006963
90 Lfl 0007129
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NMC
001 OCCIDENTAL DOICflL
001 OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL
001 KAISER (LIKINIM
001 WISE* ALUMINUM
001 TEXACO
001 TEXACO
001 TECHNISRAPMCS
001 TECHNIBHAPMICS
001 TECHNI6RAPHICS
001 TECHNI6RAPHICS
001 BELLE CHASSE HATER WORKS
001 BELLE CHASSE HATER WORKS
001 BEUE CHASSE WATER WORKS
105 COWL REFINERY
102 BEORGlfl 8ULF
SIC
CODE
2812
2612
2819
2819
2911
2911
2621
£621
2621
2621
4941
4941
494!
£911
2869
LOCATION
(CITY)
TAFT
TAfT
GRAWKY
GR8CRCY
CONVENT
CONVENT
LQCKPORT
LOCKPORT
LOCK PORT
LOCKPORT
BELLE CHASSE
BELLE CHASSE
BELLE CHASSE
CHURCH POINT
PLAQUEN1NE
STREAM ROW
(CFS!
(TENTATIVE)
RECEIVING UATER NAME (CAN 7010
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
ST JANES CANAL 84 10
ST JAKES CANAL 84 10
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL 0
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL 0
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CflNAL 0
DITCH TO 40 ARPENT CANAL 0
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
TR. TO BAYOU PLAQUEMNE 155 7
MISSISSIPPI RIVER 460000 111000
PIPE FUJI
(MGD)
KAN MM.
2.47 5.52
2.47 5.58
38.2 75
38.2 75
1.72 7.1
1.72 7.1
2.17 8.2
2.97 8.2
2.97 8.2
2.97 8.2
0.19 0.3
0.19 0.3
0.19 0.3
0.01 0.02
1.84 3.67
TUP
IKLr
(*>
0.0034
0.0034
0.053
0.053
21.08
100
100
100
100
0.0003
0.0003
0.0003
0.23
0.0026
SAMPLE
pfn i FrrifiN
HJLi-Cv t i U"
MTE
07-Fefr-84
30-ftpr-85
14-Sep~87
14-Sep-87
ll-feb-86
ll-feb-86
15-flpr-86
04-Aug-67
04-flu5-87
04-flug-87
22-Jtil-87
22-Jul-«7
22-Jul-fl7
04-Jurr-85
12-«ir86
EFFLUENT PHYSICf* /nmtnt
SAL-
IMTTY
ini 1 1
(0/00)
18
38
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TRICE
(IMC/DO
50000
1500
1500
2100
2100
900
6000
6000
6000
1190
1190
1190
790
HARDNESS
(MS/L AS
C*CQ3)
122
122
226
226
186
126
126
126
294
294
294
248
CHARflCTFRISTinS
ALKALINITY
(MS/L AS ""
CaC03>
94
94
145
145
202
104
104
104
171
171
171
290
r*
(SUi
7.6
8.9
8.9
7.3
7.3
7.7
7.3
7.3
7.3
8
8
a
7.9
8
TOTH.
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
t«6/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
<0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
19*3
(H6/LI
0.4
0.4
(0.1
(O.I
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
MINI-
MUM
DO
(HS/L
OR %
SAT.)
8
95*
8.1
7.6
77*
77*
8.1
68*
8
90*
6
84*
1 NPDES 1
76 Lfl
77 LA
78 Lfl
79 LA
80 LA
81 LA
82 Lfl
83 LA
84 LA
85 LA
86 Lfl
87 LA
88 Lfl
89 LA
90 Lfl
i
0005983
0005983
0005991
0005991
0006041
0006041
0006131
0006131
0006131
0006131
0006831
0006831
0006831
0006963
0007129
OUT-
r« t
rM_i.
i
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
105
toe
FACILITY NAME
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL
KAISER AUJIINUM
KAISER ALUMINUM
TBACO
TEXACO
TEWM6RAPHICS
TECHNIBRAPHICS
TECHN16RAPHICS
TECHNIBRAPHICS
BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
BELLE CHASSE HATER WORKS
BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
CANAL REFINERY
BEOH6IA BULF
-1
!
i
!
I
! TEST SPECIES
I M. BAHIA
1 N. BAHIA
I P. PROMELAB
I D. PULEI
1 D. PULEI
! P. PRQNELAS
1 P. PROMELAS
i D. PULEI
I SELENflSTRUM
i P. PROMELAS
1 D. PULEI
! P. PRONELAS
! 8ELENASTRUN
! D. PULEI
1 C. VARIEBOTUS
t
TEST
LENGTH
IN
U-HJJtXl IUI1UIY
U30 MORTALITY
TU .A/W
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFRUENT
2
2
8
2
1
7
7
2
4
7
2
8
4
2
8
19 100
33 100
52 100
44 75
5
91 60
0
15
46
10
15
10
24 92
51 4 100
100
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
iwctm
iNHIcU
EFRUENT
100
0
100
1 UIWUS
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFRUENT
LOEC NOEC
50 25
75 50
(6 (6
(12 (12
100 50
NOtESt CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV»CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
STRESS OBSERVED IN 100* EFR. AFTER 15 HIM,
NO MORTALITY IN 38 o/oo SALINITY CONTROL
ChV-35*; ADEQUATE SURVIVAL IN SALINITY CONTROL
20* MORT. IN 3 o/oo SALINITY CONTROL
ChV»61*i C! 178-100) DECHLORINATED NOT TESTED
-
-
ChV(6X
-
-
-
ChV(12»! CI 120-28
Ci:27-%(24H); 2-7I48H)
OiV«71*
POTENTIAL
FOR
1MCTL
•x-rm
IPralHcj*!
EFFECTS
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
-------
i, i • rHCIUIT/KCUtlVlNb MHIcn INrUwtlllUB
1
OUT-
FALL
1 NPDES t 1 FACILITY NAME
91 LA 0007129 002 GEORGIA GULF
98 Lfl 0007129 003 KBR6IA GULF
93 LA 0007129 102 GEORGIA GULF
94 LA 0007129 002 GEORGIA GULF
95 LA 0007129 003 GEORGIA BJLf
% LA 0007129 102 GEORGIA GULF
97 LA 0007501 001 CHEMICAL BOND CORP.
98 LA 0007579 005 LOU. POKED 1 LIGHT
99 LA 0007579 005 LOU. PQ*R I LIGHT
100 LA 0007684 001 STONE CONTAINED CORP.
101 LA 0007684 001 STONE CONTAINER CORP.
102 LA 0007854 001 IMC CHEMICAL GROUP
103 LA 0007854 001 IMC CHEMICAL GROUP
104 LA 0007854 001 INC CHEMICAL GROUP
105 Lfl 0007927 001 BOISE SOUTHERN
;
SIC
CODE
0*9
2869
2869
2869
£869
2869
2869
4911
4911
2621
2621
2869
2869
2869
2621
LOCATION
(CITY)
PUOUEHINE
PUOEMINE
PUOJENINE
PLAQUEMINE
PLAQUEMIttE
PLAQUENINE
DODSON
STEHINBTON
STERLING™
HODGE
HQD6E
STERLIN6TON
STERLIM3TON
STERLINGTQN
DERIDDER
RECEIVING WATER NANE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
DITCH TO BRUSHY CREEK
OUACHITA RIVER
OUPCHITA RIVER
DUEDENONA RIVER
DUGOEMONA RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
OUOCH1TA RIVER
DITCH TO CYPRESS CREEK
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE FLOH
(TENTATIVE) (NBD)
HERN 7010 NEAN NAX.
460000 111000 3.84 8.72
460000 li:000 0.87 7.62
460000 111000 1.84 3.67
460000 111000 3.84 8.72
460000 111000 0.87 7.62
460000 111000 1.84 3.67
0.7 00.0360.112
6314 273.74 65 65
6314 273.74 65 65
325 1.205 11.42
325 1.205 11.42
6314 273.74 2.59 3.42
6314 273.74 2.59 3.42
6314 273.74 2.59 3.42
500 24 23.98 61.5
SAMPLE
IMC COLLECTION
(*) DATE
0.0054 12-*jy-86
0.0012 12-*iy-86
0.0026 12-*ar86
0.0054 12-*«r86
0.0012 12-*ay-86
0.0026 02-feb-88
100 05-Har-85
26.9 23-Jun-B6
26.9 23-Jun-86
61.24 16-Jul-86
61.24 16-Jul-fl6
1.45 19-Nay-87
!.45 19-«iy-87
1.45 19-May-67
37.79 05-Feb-85
EFFLUENT PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
20
12
14
20
12
IS
1
0
0
2
2
4
4
4
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHQ/Cff)
2800
1200
1200
1300
1300
3400
3400
3400
2000
HARDNESS
(M6/L AS
CaC03)
52
200
200
72
72
102
102
102
138
ALKALINITY
(N6/L AS
CaC03>
367
85
85
533
533
95
95
95
74
PH
(SU)
8.3
8.7
8
a
8.8
8.4
8.3
6.6
6.6
8.3
8.3
8.6
8.6
8.6
7.3
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
1M6/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MG/L)
0.3
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.6
2.5
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
3.4
3.4
3.4
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MG/L
OR *
SAT.)
5.8
8.1
7.9
91*
83*
90*
8.6
9.1
87*
8.4
80*
6.8
88*
8.8
1 NPDES 1
91 LA 0007129
92 LA 0007129
93 LA 0007129
94 LA 0007129
95 Ifl 0007129
% LA 0007129
97 Lfl 0007501
98 LA 0007579
99 LA 0007579
100 LA 0007684
101 LA 0007684
102 LA 0007854
103 LA 0007854
104 LA 00078S4
105 LA 0007«7
OUT-
TEH I
rHLL
i
002
003
102
002
003
102
001
005
005
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAMI
GEORGIA GULF
GEORGIA GULF
GEORGIA GULF
GEORGIA GULF
GEORGIA GULF
GEORGIA GULF
CHEMICAL BOND CORP.
LOU. POMER t LIGHT
LOU. POtCR i LIGHT
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
STONE CONTAINER CORP.
INC CHEMICAL GROUP
INC CHEMICAL GROUP
IMC CHEMICAL GROUP
BOISE 90UTHB*
— .
!
!
!
i
,
i TEST SPECIES
! C. VARIEGATUS
1 C. VARIEBATUS
! C. VARIEGATUS
! C. MARIEBATUS
t C. VARIEGATUS
1 C. VARIEGATUS
i 0. PULEI
1 D. PULEI
! P. PROMELAS
! D. PULEI
! P. PROMELAS
i D. PULEK
: P. PRONELAS
! SELENASTRUM
! D. PULEX
— i
TEST
LENGTH
ry
— trrLUtHi lunuir
LC50 MORTALITY
*U . AA-
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
2
1
1
8
8
9
1
1
7
1
7
2
8
4
i
100 50
5
0
100
100
54 100
0
0
0
0
5
16 16 90*
8 100
91
0
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
DeCHLOR- EFFLUENT
TMflTm
EFRUENT LOEC NDEC
100 50
100 50
100 50
0
12 6
50 25
0
NOTES) CI-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
CMKJfflONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO HORTfUTY IN 50* EFFLUENT
-
-
ChV?l<
ChV«71*
ChV«7I*
-
-
-
-
-
•MORTALITY DATA FOR 50* EFFL.
OtV-9*
CfiV»35*j STIMULATORY IN 6* AND 12* EFa.
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
IUCT
WNM
Ir&lhuwi
EFFECTS
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
10
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
CHRONIC
ACUTE
CHRONIC
ACUTE
CHRONIC
CHRONIC
(CUTE
to
I
-------
;. — - ••tn;iuiT/rfcmviiu UNISK IWUWWIIUK
,
,
•
i
! 1 NPDEB 1
1
!106 Lfl 0008036
1107 Lfl 0020044
aOB LA 0020087
a09 LA 0080067
aiO Lfl 0080087
ail LA 0089769
ai2 LA 0029769
! 113 Lfl 0089769
ai4 LA 0029769
: 115 Lfl 0089963
!116 LA 0032221
! 117 Lfl 0038881
aiB LA 0038881
a 19 LA 0032417
1120 LA 0038417
OUT-
FAU
1 FACILITY NAME
004 CLECO
001 PLAIN KHL1IC
001 OBERLIN
001 OBERLIN
001 OBERLIN
001 ASRICO CHEMICAL
001 ASRICO CHEMICAL
001 ABRICO CHEMICAL
001 ASRICO OCMICAL
001 8ULF OIL CHEMICAL
004A USA-f ORT POLK
001A USA-FORT POLK
001A USA-FORT POLK
001 ATLAS PRQCESSINB
001 ATLAS PROCESSING
SIC
CODE
4911
4952
4958
4952
495E
£873
2873
2873
8873
2863
9711
9711
9711
8911
8911
LOCATION
(CITY)
BOYCE
PLfllN DBLIN6
OBERLIN
OKRLIN
OBERLIN
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
DONALDSON
ST. JRMES
FORT POLK
FORT POLK
FORT POLK
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPQCT
RECEIVING MATER NAME
LAKE ROOEflACHER
CYPRESS BflYOU
BAYOU BLUE
BflYOU BLUE
BAYOU BLUE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BUNDICK CREEK
DRAKES CREEK
DRAKES CREEK
BRUSHY BAYOU
BRUSHY BAYOU
STREAM RW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
234 3
124 0.08
119.8 7.02
119.8 7.08
119.8 7.08
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
460000 111000
371 27
371 27
371 87
80 0.3
20 0.3
PIPE FLOW
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
1.45 7.66
0.17 0.35
0.85 0.7
0.85 0.7
0.85 0.7
5.09 11.8
5.09 11.8
5.04 11.8
5.04 11.8
0.8 0.38
0.79 3.08
1.1 3.3
1.1 3.3
1.36 8.48
1.36 8. 48
IUC
(*)
48.86
76.47
5.83
5.83
5.83
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.00088
4.33
5.94
5.94
87.54
87.54
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
27-thr~84
06-flug~83
21-Jul-87
81-JuI-67
21-Jul-87
86-Aug-67
86-Aug-87
08-Feb-88
08-Fe!>-88
06-JW-85
05-ftug-86
15-Stp-67
15-Sep-87
86-Jun-84
17-NOV-87
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
8
1
0
0
0
crr(_^.
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
180
1000
4900
4900
*900
1400
1400
1850
1250
28000
400
390
390
1700
690
JVI W1I3ILW
HARDNESS
(MS/L AS
CiC03)
86
38
37
37
37
376
376
30
56
56
270
i/trcmu*. i
ALKALINITY
(NBA AS
C*CG3!
S£
403
K
88
88
58
58
97
95
95
61
JVKHU
P«
(SU)
6.4
8.5
7.1
7.1
7.1
7
7
6.9
6.9
8.4
10
9.5
9.5
8
7.4
tniDUUJ
TOTAL
RES1D.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(NB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
(0.1
KIN!- t
MUM !
DO :
(MB/t !
n * :
SAT.! !
8.4 \
7.8 !
87* ;
i
8.8 !
8.2 I
94* !
!
100* !
8.8 !
8.4 !
91* I
7.8 '.
6.8 :
64* !
I
*»
U)
!
i
! OUT-
* cot i
t rnJL
! 1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
1106 LA 0008036 004 CLECO
1107 LA 0080044 001 PLAIN DEALINB
:i08 LA 0020087 001 OBERLIN
! 109 LA 0080087 001 OBERLIN
1 110 LA 0080087 001 OBERLIN
1111 Lfl 0089769 001 A6RICO CHEMICAL
il 12 LA 0029769 001 ABRICO OCM1CAL
ai3 LA 0089769 001 (BRICO CHEMICAL
a 14 LA 0089769 001 A6RICO CHEMICAL
a 15 LA 0089963 001 BULF OIL CHEMICAL
1116 Lfl 0032221 004A USA-FORT POLK
1117 Lfl 0038881 001A USA-fORT POLK
1118 LA 0038221 001A USA-FORT POLK
a 19 LA 0038417 001 flTLftS PROCESSING
:i80 LA 0032417 001 ATLAS P80CESSINE
i
!
1
!
I
1
i
1 TEST SPECIES
|
! D. PUB
! D. PULO
! P. PWNELAS
! SELEXflSTRt*
! D. PULE1
1 D. PULO
> P. PROMELAS
! SELENASTRUM
1 D. PULO
! N. BfiMlR
! B. PULO
1 P. PROMELAS
! D. PULEI
! D. PULEX
! P. PRONELAS
, .. ..:- 1
TEST
LENGT
TU
in
DAYS
8
8
8
4
2
2
8
4
1
1
8
8
8
1
7
urujmi luiiuir
4 LC50 MORTALITY
til t (Vff
-._-™,™, .,„,- -„..::, v: vi „.,-... i: ILL JRj J^^
84H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUEKT
75
78 100
15
(18 94
5
5
15
54
5
0
20
65 100
0
0
47 100
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
&ECHLOR- EFFLUENT
t kirti-t-n
EFFLUENT LDEC NOEC
100
(18 (12
100 50
0
100 SO
50 25
j COWBITS
NOTES: CI<95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LOO
CMWHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
4C TE«P. BIFF. BETWEEN CONTROL AND 100* EFFL
CI: 67-77
NO SI3IIF1CANT EFFECT
ChV(12*
-
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
DiV=7l*; STIMULATORY IN 50* AND LESS EFFL.
-
-
MOTE HIGH pH 110.3)
ChV=71X
-
-
ChV=35X; Cl:39-58
, !
POTENTIflL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
„! ,t „ _ . .,,...._._„„..„, ,„ ,„ „
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO (CUTE
NO fiCUT£
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO SCUTE
NO BCUTE
NO ftQJT£
NO CHKMC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
-------
I
!
{
1
1
: i NPOES i
1121 LA 0038417
! 122 U) 0032417
I1E3 LA 00345M
!124 Lfl 0036340
1125 LA 0036366
1126 LA 0038091
!127 LA 0038091
1128 LA 0038091
!129 LA 0038741
1130 LA 0039390
1131 LA 0041025
1132 Lfl 0041394
U33 LA 0041 718
1134 Lfl 0041751
1135 LA 0046477
— — FflCILITY/KtCtlVINB MHItK iW-UKfWI 1UH _____
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
ATLAS PROCESSINB
HTLOS PROCESSHi
BERNICE
LAKE CHARLES PLT A
LAKE CHARLES PLT C
NEU ORLEANS-C. BANK
NEU ORLEANS-C BANK
NEU QRLEANS-E. BANK
MONROE
PLACID REFININB
CERTAIN TEED
SHREVEPCKT
KAISER ALUMINUM
EUNICE
JONESBORO
Off*
BIC
CODE
2911
2911
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
2911
2821
4952
2819
4952
4952
i nmrffiu
LJULHI 1UB
(CITY)
SHREVEPORT
GHflEVEPORT
BERNICE
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE OODLES
MEM ORLEANS
HEW ORLEANS
NEU ORLEANS
MONROE
PORT ALLEN
LAKE CHARLES
SHREVEPORT
BATON ROUGE
EUNICE
JBNES80RO
RECEIVING HATER NAME
BRUSHY BAYOU
BPUBHYBflYOU
BAYOU D'ARBONNE
CflLCASlEU RIVER
CALCASIEU RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
OUACHITA RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
PPG CANAL/BAYOU D' INK
RED RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
BAYOU MALLET
DUBDEWNA CREEK
STREAM FLOW
(CFS) PIPE aw
(TENTATIVE) (MED)
(CAN 7010 (CAN MAI.
20 0.3 1.36 8.48
20 0.3 1.3£ 8.49
214 0 0.25 0.38
4416 259 4.56 15.84
4416 259 3.15 6.7
460000 111000 86.2 106.2
460000 111000 96.2 106.2
460000 111000 86.2 106.2
1694 720 8.87 33.87
460000 111000 0.52 0.72
500 300 0.72 1.0*
24210 1150 26.82 57.89
460000 111000 0.69 1.04
154 7.2 1.19 2
56.52 0.02 0.4
(*)
87.54
87.54
100
2.66
1.65
0.12
0.12
0.12
1.81
0.0007
0.37
3.49
0.001
30.1
%,8
SAMPLE
r*rm t CPTtflJ
lAM-LcL 1 lUn
DATE
17-Nw-87
17-Nov-87
06-Nar-B5
09-Oct-B*
09-Oct-84
Ofl-Oee-B7
08-Dec-87
OS-Dec-87
23-Jun-86
01-Nov-B3
10-Feb-fl6
14-«ay-86
l9-ttar-B5
26-Frt-85
23-Jun-87
SAL-
TMTTV
lilj 1 T
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
crru*
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
Towrc
IHNUC
(UMHO/CM)
690
690
390
900
700
1000
1000
1000
700
925
700
29000
600
550
j»i rmaiuii
HARDNESS
(MR/I OC
Irw/t Ho
C«CQ3>
JO
96
66
BE
86
lie
26
126
55
L/LTCFULHL t
ALKALINITY
fMT/1 OC
Inb/L. TO
CaCQ3>
60
157
242
38
74
68
)800
158
128
rfVffWU
r^J
PH
(SW
7.4
7.4
7.1
7.4
7.2
7
7
7
6.1
7.3
7.4
8.9
7.2
7.2
CK13I1U3
TOTAL
RESIO.
CMLQ8-
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
2.8
2.8
2.8
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
(1W/U
(0.1
(0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(MS/L
fin «
UH *
SOT.)
7.1
7.4
8.7
8.7
8.6
91*
8.8
8.6
8.3
8
a. s
1
!
!
'
! t NPDES 1
1121 LA 0032*17
! 122 LA 0032*17
1123 LA 0034568
1124 Lfl 0036340
U25 LA 0036366
1 126 LA 0038091
1127 LA 0038091
,'128 LA 0038091
U29 LA 00387*1
1130 Lfl 0039390
;i31 U) 0041023
!132 LA 0041394
1133 LA 0041718
1134 Lfl 0041751
1135 LA 0046477
OUT-
fBi 1
rHU.
i
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
ATLAS PROCESSING
ATLAS PROCESSINB
BERNICE
LAKE CHARLES PLT A
LAKE CHARLES PLT C
NEU ORLEANS-E. BANK
NEU ORLEANS-E. BANK
NEU ORLBWS-E. BANK
MONROE
PLACID REFININB
CERTAIN TEED
SHREVEPORT
KAISER ALUMINUM
EUNICE
JONESBORO
;
!
I
1
*
i
1 TEST SPECIES
»
4
! SELENASTRUM
! D. POO
1 D. PULEI
! D. PULEI
! D. PULEI
! SELENASTRUM
t D. PULE!
i P. PROHELAS
! D. PULEI
; D. PULO
! P. PRDCLAS
! P. PR0MELAS
; M. ALMYRA
; D. PULEJ
i SELENASmH
, y
TEST
LENGTH
IN
DAYS 24H
4
1
2 77
2 17
2 4
4
1 (6
7
1
2
1
1
2 12
2 4
*
•i-LufcNi Tummr
LC50 MORTALITY
WHY**
48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
4
40
74 80
17 100
4 100
(3 94«
100
27 100
5
0
0
0
3 100
4 100
11 63
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 10W PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFRUENT
EFFLUENT LOEC WEC
0
0
0
(3 (3
5
20 50 25
0
100
0
12 6
NOTES: C!«95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO SIB. EFFECT
-
-
-
-
ChV<3*; »DAIA FOR 50< EFFUj DECHL. EFFL. STIM.
-
ChV=35*
-
6REEN ALGAE PRESENT IN SAMPLE
INSTREAM DILUTION FROM PPS'S DISCHARGE
-
CI: 10-16<2*H); 2-4I48H)
-
ChV=9)i
POTENTIAL
FOR
fUCTOCQil
iffj I ntHW
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
YES ftOJTE
VES mm
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES flCUTE
YES CHRONIC
-------
t ______ FHCILIIY/NtLUVlHi WliH INMimHIHJN
,
',
.
1
i
! I NPDES 1
j
1136 LA 0046477
1137 U 00*6*77
U3fl Lfl 0051993
1139 LA 0051993
1140 LA 0052370
!141 Lfl 0052370
1142 LA 0053716
!143 LA 0056502
1144 LA 0056651
: 145 LA 0056651
!I46 LA 0059153
1147 LA 0059153
!148 LA 0099153
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
JONESHX)
joraoso
OflRK OIL
CLARK OIL
CflLCASlEU REFINING
CALCASIEU REFINING
BOSSIER CITY
MANY
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
SIC
CODE
4952
4952
an
an
2911
2911
4952
4952
2631
2631
2833
2833
2833
LOCUTION
(CITY)
JONESSOfiO
JDNC80IB
NT. AIRY
NT. AIRY
LAKE CHARLES
LAKE CHARLES
BOSSIER CITY
MANY
DE SOTO P.
DE SOTO P.
LIVINGSTON
LIVINGSTON
LIVINGSTON
RECEIVING WATER NAME
DU6DENONR CREEK
OCDCMONO CKEK
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
CflLCASlEU RIVER
CflLCASlEU RIVER
RED RIVER
BAYOU LA NANA
RED RIVER
RED RIVER
POOLEY BR, TO ANITE R.
POO£Y BR. TO ANITE R.
POOLEY BR. TO ANITE R.
STREAM FLOW
(CFS1
(TENTATIVE!
MEAN 7010
56.52 0.02
S.B 0.02
460000 149370
460000 149370
4581 £60
4581 260
19203 972
101.15 0.69
22353 1016
22353 1016
306.5
306.5
306.5
PIPE FLOW
(NOD)
MEAN MAX.
0.4
0.4
0.05 0.12
0.05 0.12
0.03 0.06
0.03 0.06
5.5 12.7
0.36 1.72
5.9 13.8
5.9 13.8
2.9 17.2
2.9 17.2
2.9 17.2
IMC
(*)
96.8
96.8
0.00006
0.00006
0.018
0.018
0.87
44.71
0.89
0.89
1.45
1.45
1.45
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DOTE
23-Jim-S7
23-Juft-§7
09-Hpr-84
09-flpr-84
n-Feb-88
17-Feb-88
03-«ov-87
IO-Seo-85
OS-Nov-87
Oe-Nov-8?
20-Oct-B6
20-Oct-66
20-0ct-a6
- — —" "-trr LAJLPI i rnfS.UHL/unt-niL**. uwtMUicniDi ii_a
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
2
2
2
SPECIFIC
CfflCHJC-
TftNCE
(LKHQ/DO
550
550
2500
2600
6000
6000
1200
700
3200
3200
350
350
350
HARDNESS
IKS/LAS
DCD3)
55
55
367
367
49
53
53
53
ALKALINITY
(NBA. AS
CaC03)
128
128
130
130
64
60
60
60
PH
(SU)
7.2
7.2
7.9
7.9
8.4
8.4
6.9
7.1
8.4
8.4
8.2
8.2
8.2
TOTflL
RESI0.
CHLOR-
INE
(MB/L)
(0.1
!0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
"•"'"•" '•'""•'"""""'• •••-'••—-———
MINI-
MUM
UNION- DO
I ZED (MB/L
NH3 OR *
(MB/L) SAT. )
0.1 83<
0.1 7.7
7.6
6.4
0.2 93*
0.2 93*
(0.1
8.4
4.8
4.8 71*
(0.1 93*
(0.1 8.2
(0.1 92*
j
;
1
! OUT-
i CQt I
i rHJL
! 1 NPDES 1 1
1136 LA 0046477 001
1 13? LA 0046477 001
1138 LA 0051993 001
!139 Lfl 0051993 001
1140 Lfl 0052370 001
1141 LA 0052370 001
!142 Lfl 0053716 001
! 143 LA 0056502 001
1144 LA 0056651 001
! 145 LA 0056651 001
,'146 LA 0059153 001
!147 LA 0059153 001
J148 LA 0059153 00!
FACILITY NAME
JONESKMO
JQNES80RO
CLARK OIL
CLARK OIL
CALCASIEU REFINING
CflLCASIEU REFINING
BOSSIER CITY
MANY
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
J
1
1
1
I
1
! TEST SPECIES
! P. PROMELAS
! D. PULEI
I D. PULO
1 P. PRQMEUfi
! D. PULO
I P. PROCLAS
! SELENRSTRUH
: D. PULO
,' SELENASTRUN
1 P. PROMELAS
! CERIOOflPHNIfl
i D. PLUEI
1 P. PROHEUB
crrmcm luaiL
TEST
LENGTH U30
TU
DAYS 24H 43H CHRONIC
7 87
2
1
1
2 79
8
4 74
2 15 15
4
7 36
7
2
8
IT "
MORTALITY
IU t/VVK
in iw»
EFRUENT
55
0
0
0
75
30
56
100
41
90
0
5
10
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT OS
IN 100* PERCENT
DECHLOR- EFRUENT
T MOTTO
EFaUENT LOEC NOEC
25 12
100 50
25 12
0
12 6
50 25
UJBBtN i y •
NOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL RRQUNB LC50
OiWNRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
DiV=17*
-
-
-
C!:66-36
ChV*7I*
ChV=17*; CI:59-99
CI: 12-17 (24 1 48H)
ChV=9*; NOTE HIGH NH3
ChV=35*j CI:27-48i NOTE HI6H NH3
ND SI6. EFFECT
-
ND SIS. EFFECT
POTENTIAL
FOB
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
YES CHRONIC
NO BCUTE
NO SCUTE
NO BCUTE
NQ (SCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NQ CHRONIC
YES flCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO flCUTE
NO CHRONIC
-------
1
OUT-
FALL
1 NPOES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
1 NM 0000159 006 GBERAL ELECTRIC
EM 0020737 001 6RWTS
3 m 0028100 001 aOLf MINERAL RESOURCES
4 W 0028353 050 U50E-10S ALAMOS NTL LAB
5 NN 0028827 001 LAS VEBAS
6 NN 0028827 001 LAS VESAS
1-HULilT/KlUlViNU "HltN lITUIOTHUUn
SIC
CODE
3724
WK
1094
4612
4952
4952
LOCATION
(CITY)
ALBUQUERQUE
BRflNTS
SAN MATED
LOS ALAMOS
LAS VESAS
LAS VEGflS
RECEIVING WATER NAME
SAN JOSE 0R./RI06RANDE
RIO SW JOSE
TRIE. TO SAN NIOEL CR.
TRIB. TO RIO SRANDE
B1LLINAS RIVER
BILLINBS RIVER
STREAM aOU
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
1021 0
6.73 0.99
0
m
0.1
0.1
PIPE aw
(NGD)
MEAN MX.
0.8
1.04 1.56
6.28 7.1
0.015 0.042
1.57 2.4
1.57 2.4
IHC
IX)
100
100
100
0.014
%.05
96.05
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
21-*ar87
lWov-85
lQ-flfir-84
U-ta-8&
15-Ser-fl6
28-Dec-87
—«*' '"• •""• 'fcrriaffiJIi >^1I311-«L/WiKniV*Mi, i^f»»i««.iC:ni3[ iu
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
0
2
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UWD/CM>
660
2200
2600
650
950
HARDNESS
(MBA. AS
CaC03)
250
SSfl
195
307
ALKALINITY
(NS/L AS
CaC03)
106
2O
428
15B
PH
(SU)
7.2
7.7
8.8
fl.3
7.6
7.4
TOTAL
RESID.
CM.OR-
INE
IMS/L!
(0.1
(0.1
1.3
1.5
3""- •
MINI-
MUM
UNION- 00
I ZED (NBA.
NK3 CR X
(K3/L) SflT. )
(0.1 7.6
6
)3.6 5.4
(0.1 7.4
0.5 94*
OUT-
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
1 W 0000159 006 BENERflL ELECTRIC
2 MX 0020737 001 BRANTS
3 NH 0086100 001 GULF MINERAL RESOURCES
4 m 002B355 050 USDE-tOS AUMOS NTL LAB
5 Ml 0028827 001 LAS VEGAS
6 m oo2aae7 ooi LAS VEQAS
__________^
CHRONIC
HORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST LCSO IN 100* PERCENT
LEN8TH (XffFLUEHT) MOHTSLITY DECH.OR- EFaUENT
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFRUENT EFFLUENT LQEC NOEC
D. PULE! 2 0
D. PUUI 13 100 0
0. PULEI 1 0
D. PULEX 2 78 52 BO
D. PULE! 233 100 50
D. PULEX 1 (6 100 5
NOTES: CI=95X CONFIDENCE INTERVflL AROUND LCSO
CW=€HRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFTLUENT
NO WRT.j VARIflftf DISOWRGE; STORMUATER/COOLINB
CI: 2-5 (24H)
CIi 65-93 !24H)i 39-70 (48H)
CI: NOT CALCULABLEi NOTE TOX. IN DECHL TEST
NOTE HIGH NH3 ITDT. NH3»36 MB/L)
POTEHTia
FOR
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
YES PCUTE
NO «JTE
NO KinE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
en
i
-------
rwfi TTu/nerrtnTup UATTD ttrnoifvnnu _ — — — —
...j_i.-i. J-IT: -T- ... - - • - ••""—- - rHLlLl 1 I/ KtUtlVlrW MMICn IHTUIWMI fUrT - -
OUT-
FALL
t NPOES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
1 OK 0000159 003 MCOONJ€U.-tt)UBU8
?« 0000153 003 IGOefLL-DMUIS
3 W 0000191 001 SEBUOYHH FUEL
1 OK 0000191 001 SEOUQYflH FUa
5 CK 0000191 001 SEOUOYBH FUEL
6 OK 0000256 002 CDNOCO
7 IK 0000256 001 CQNQCO
8 OK 0000256 001 CONOCO
9 OK 0000272 001 PRYDR 1ND. CO6ERV.
10 DK 0000531 001 ALLIED MATERIALS
n a< 0000031 ooi GLUED MATERIALS
12 OK 0000744 001 tCYEDWVSER
13 OK 0000744 001 NEYERHHUSER
14 OK 0000795 001 TYSCM HODS
IS OX 0000795 001 TYSON FOODS
SIC
CODE
3471
3*71
2819
2819
2819
2911
2911
2911
CORP. 4953
8911
2911
2621
2&21
2016
2016
LOCATION
(CITY)
TULSA
TULSO
GORE
BOS
GORE
PONCA CITY
PONCACITY
PONCA CITY
PRYDR
STROUD
STRDUD
VBLLIANT
VALLIflKT
NORMAN
NORNRN
RECEIVING UATER NAME
TRIE. TO M1N60 CREEK
TRIE. TO MINED C8EEX
ILLINOIS RIVER
ILLINOIS RIVER
ILLINOIS RIVER
OMAHA CREEK
DNRHA CREEK
ONflHA CREEK
SRflNB NEOSHO RIVER
SflLT CREEK
SflLT CREEK
GARLAND CREEK
GARLAND CREEK
LITTLE RIVER
LITTLE RIVER
STROM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
16.14 0.11
16.14 0.11
1537 75.76
1537 75.78
1537 75. 7B
1234 0
1234 0
1234 0
£971 146.54
7.3 0.01
7.3 0.01
0
0
1851 i.77
1851 1.77
PIPE aow
(MGD)
MEAN MAX.
0.75 9.02
0.75 9.08
2.16 2.69
£.16 2.89
2.16 2.89
1.79 3.5
0.06 0.5
0.06 0.5
18.46 29.7
18.46 29.7
0.68 0.98
0.68 0.98
IHC
W
91.36
91.36
4.23
4.23
4.23
100
100
100
1.86
90.29
90.29
100
100
37.32
37.32
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DOTE
09-J«l-64
OHee-85
ll-fltH-87
Il-flur87
ii-fiug-87
30-flor-B5
30-flpr-8S
10-Miy-BB
02-fipr-«5
20-Jun-68
20-J
-------
'-
s
j1
,' 1 NPDES 1
: 16 OK 0000795
1 17 OK 0000795
! 11 OK 0000793
! 19 OK 0000609
1 20 OH 0000609
! 21 OK 0000609
: 22 OK 0000009
! 23 OK 0000609
; 2* OX 0000609
I 25 OK 0000609
; 26 OK 0000625
I 27 OK 0000825
1 a OX 0001031
! 29 OK 0001031
! 30 OK 0001031
1
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
00*
t
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NANE
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
TYSON FOODS
USAF-TINKER AFB
UGAF-TINKER AFB
USAF-TINKER AFB
USAF-TIIKER AFB
USAF-TINKER AFB
USAF-TIIKER AFB
USAF-TINKER AFB
KERR-NC6EE
KERR-McSEE
VISTA POLYMERS
VISTA POLYMERS
VISTA POLYMERS
SIC
CODE
£0)6
SOU
2016
3*71
3*71
3*71
3*7i
3*71
3*71
3*71
2911
2911
2821
2821
2821
fflPfl tTV fOCTC I Ul W" U&TTQ TUCnQMtVf f DM
—rHLlL,* i Y/nUJtJVINU MHifcH I W*UnnHl lUP*
LOCATION
(CITY) RECEIVING UATER NANE
NORMAN LITTLE RIVER
NORNAN LITTLE RIVER
NORMAN LITTLE RIVER
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY CRUTCH) CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
NIDUEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
MIDWEST CITY SOLDIER CREEK
UYNNEUOOD TURKEY SANDY CR.
UYNNEUOOD TURKEY SANDY CR.
OKLAHOMA CITY CRUTCH) CREEK
OKLAHOMA CITY CRUTCHD CREEK
OKLAHOMA CITY CRUTDfl CREEK
-tea irtn DnvKiroun*»iirj!L CHOSSOCTEOISTICS • — •
STREAK ROM
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
PIPE aow
(MED)
MEAN 7Q10 MEAN MAX.
1851 1.
1851 1.
1851 1.
37.2
83*. 2
83*. 2
37.18
37.18
37.18
77 0.68 0.98
77 0.68 0.96
77 0.68 0.98
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.07S
0
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.58 1.07
0 0.67 0.95
0 0.67 0.95
0 0.58 52.*3
0 0.58 52.*3
0 0.58 S2.*3
IUC
(*)
37.32
37.32
37.32
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
19-NW-86
23-Fet>-88
23-Feb-88
29-Oct-8*
29-Oct-8*
29-0ct-8*
30-Jul-B6
30-Jol-86
17-Auj-87
17-AUJ-87
27-Kar-B4
l*-to~88
10-Feb-B3
10-Fefr-88
!0-Feb-88
SAL-
INITY
(a/oo)
1
0
0
2
0
0
Z
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHQ/DI)
1000
1000
1000
1800
AOO
500
1100
1100
1300
1300
1380
1800
900
900
900
HARDNESS
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
36
87*
168
170
556
5*
*80
*80
276
ALKALINITY
-------
1
1 NPDES 1
31 OK 0001261
32 OK 0001261
33 K 0001261
34 OK 0001295
35 OX 0001309
36 OX 0021024
37 OK 0022616
38 OK 0022616
39 0X0022624
400X0022861
41 0X0026000
42 OK 0026221
43 OK 0026221
44 OK 0026701
45 OK 0026701
— — ^ — — — — -- i — _ TMLJLII l/nuxjvjra MMicn jnrunmuun — *—— ~- — :
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NPJC
001 EABLE-PIDCR INDUSTRIES
001 EPOf-PICHER INDUSTRIES
001 Efiai-WOe INDUSTRIES
001 TOTAL PETROLEUM
003 SINCLAIR OIL
001 FARMLAND INDUSTRIES
001 SUYNQN-SWFT PLANT
001 6UYWN-SM1FT PLANT
eUYMON-NORTH PLANT
HARTSHMN
001 SAPULA
002 TULSA NDRTHSIDE
002 TULSA NDRTHSIDE
001 CUSHIN&-SOJTH STP
001 CUSHINS-SOUTH STP
Off*
611.
CODE
3339
3339
3339
2911
2911
2873
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
4952
I IWTIdH
UUUHi lUPf
(CITY)
OUAPAU
BUAPAU
HUftPflW
ARDMORE
TULSA
ENID
BUfflQN
GUYMON
GUYMON
HARTSHORN
SAPULA
TULSA
TULSA
CUSHINB
CU5HIN6
RECEIVING HATER NAME
SPRING RIVER
SPRING RIVER
mm RIVER
SAND CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
SKELETON CREEK
BEAVER RIVER
BEAVER RIVER
BEAVER RIVER
BRUSHY CREEK
ROCK CREEK
BIRD CREEK
BIRD CREEK
COTTONMOOD CREEK
COTTONHOOD CREEK
STREAM FLW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
HEflN 7010
2058 235.4
2058 235.4
£058 235.4
182.1 0
2720 619
42.4 3.31
34.59 0
34.59 0
24.95 0
130 76
39.8 0.618
16.14 0.11
16.14 0.11
1240 0
1240 0
PIPE aou
(NG0)
MEAN MAI.
0.93 26.14
0.93 26.14
0.93 &. 14
0.088 0.151
1.03
0.98 1.42
1.05 1.09
1.05 1.09
0.53 0.65
0.17 l.l
1.44
6 30
6 30
0.98 2.09
0.98 2.09
»itf»
IWL
!*)
0.61
0.61
0.61
100
0.26
30.8
100
100
100
0.35
76.18
98.63
98.83
100
100
SAMPLE
m t trf"Ttrw
wJU-tLUUN
DflTE
09-Jun-B7
09-Jtin~B7
09-Jim-87
06-Aug-66
23-Jul-S4
03-Jtm-6&
27-Oct-87
27-Oct-87
l?-Oc»-85
2&-«ar-e5
23-Sep-85
26-*ar-85
26-*ar-65
20-Jun-88
20-Jun-88
— — — — trrLUtfll WITBlLHL/LfttmU*. UWKMUI tKlbllLS
SAL-
f yf TV
IN1TT
(0/00)
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
SPECIFIC
CCSfflUC-
ISLw
180
180
ISO
5250
1100
5000
750
750
1300
550
600
700
700
700
700
HARDNESS
(JS/L AS
CaC03)
126
126
126
208
256
1122
271
108
130
218
218
83
83
ALKALINITY
(BG/L AS
C*C03)
58
58
a
212
40
92
3%
62
85
203
203
166
1&6
pH
(SU)
7
7
7
7.8
7.2
7.2
8
8
8.6
7.3
7.3
7.8
7.8
7.3
7.3
TOTAL
RES1D.
CHLOR-
INE
(M6/L)
7.2
7.2
7.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(NG/U
(0.1
(0.1
«n
0.2
0.2
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
H6/1)
OR *
SOT.)
8.4
94*
7.8
7.2
90*
91*
8.9
9.2
7.5
8
8.4
89*
65*
1
OUT-
r/jj |
rHLL
I NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
31 OK 0001261 001 EAGLE-PICKER INDUSTRIES
32 OK 0001261 001 EflBLE-PIDCR INDUSTRIES
33 OK 0001261 001 EAGLE-PIDCR INDUSTRIES
34 OK 0001295 001 TOTAL PETROLEUM
35 OK 0001309 003 SINCLAIR OIL
36 OK 0021024 001 FARMLAND INDUSTRIES
37 OK 0022616 001 6UYHQN-SMIFT PLANT
38 OK 0022616 001 6UYKQN-SMIFT PLANT
39 OK 0022624 BUYWN-NORTH PUKT
40 OK 0022861 HARTSHORN
41 OK 0026000 001 SAPULA
42 OK 0026221 002 TULSA NORTHS IDE
43 OK 0026221 002 TULSA NORTHSIDE
44 OK 0026701 001 CUSHINB-SQUTH STP
45 OK 0026701 001 OJSHIN6-SOUTH STP
, crruucm IUAU.IIT
CUSOMC
WRTflUTY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENBTH LCSO MORTALITY DECW.OR- EFFluWT
IM , . TIJ (AfW IWOTFn
in ^^ in iuv* iiw i tu «•«»».•.»•••— ™
TEST SPECIES DflYS 24H 48H CfflONIC EFaUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PUB 2 (6 (6 100 0
SELENASmM 4 (3 99 49 (3 (3
P. PRQMELA5 8 10.5 100 5 12 6
D. PULEX 1 45
D. PULEX 1 0
P. PRONELAS 7 0
SELENASTRUM 4 53 % 50 25
P. PROHELAS & 64 70 IOC 50
D, PULIU 1 50
D. PULEX 1 0 0
D. PULEI 1 0 0
P. PROKRAS 1 100 0
D. PULEI 288 100 0
D. PULEX 2 30
P. PROMELAS 8 IS
ujwitn 1 3
NOTE: Cl«95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND 030
ChV-CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFaUENT
NOTE EXTREMELY HIBH CH.QR1*
ChV(3*i NOTE EXTREMELY MI6H CHLORI*
ChV*8.5»; NOTE EXTRDB.Y HIW D1DR1NE
-
-
-
CHV-35*
CI:50-e7; DhV»71*
-
-
-
LCSO NOT CALCULATED! MORT. OCCURRED AFTER 2.5H
-
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTDCQH
i no i nc,Hn
EFFECTS
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHSONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
* KM
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES SCUTE
YES BOJTE
NO CHSONIC
-------
OUT-
FALL
1 NPBES 1 1
46 OK 0026841
47 OK 0026841
48 OK 0026841 001
49 OK 0026841 001
50 OK 0026859 001
51 OK 0026859 001
52 OK 0027553 001
53 OK 0027553 001
54 OK 0027553 001
55 OK 002793! 001
56 OK 0027931 001
57 OK 0028134 001
58 OK 0029131 001
59 OK 0029131 001
60 OK 0030295 001
FACILITY NAME
MIDWEST CITY NDRTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY NORTHSIDE
HIDWEST CITY NOHTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY NORTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY SOUTHSIDE
MIDWEST CITY SOUTHSIDE
OKLA. CITY-CHISHOLM CSK
OKLA. CITY-CHISHQLM CRK
OKLA. CITY-CHISHOLM CRK
MOORE
MOORE
OKMULGEE
HUSK OGEE
HUSXOGEE
USfl-FORT SILL
FACILITY/RECEIVING HATER IWTOMflTION-
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING HATER NAfC
4952 MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
4952 MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHD CREEK
4952 MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
4952 MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHD CREEK
4952 MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
4952 MIDWEST CITY CRUTCHO CREEK
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY CHISHOLM CREEK
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY CHISHOLH CREEK
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY CHISHOLM CREEK
4952 HOORE LITTLE RIVER
4952 HOORE LITTLE RIVER
4952 OKMULEEE CANADIAN R., DEEP FORK
4952 MUSXOGEE ARKANSAS RIVER
4952 NUSK06EE ARKANSAS RIVER
9711 FORT SILL E. CACHE CREEK
STREAM FLOW
!CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7Q10
37.3 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
37.2 6.8
8.44 0
8.44 0
238 14. 17
21762 21%
21762 21%
49.95 0
PIPE FLOW
IHGD)
MEAN MAX.
5.59 6.28
5.59 6.28
5.59 6.28
5.59 6.28
1.6
1.6
4.66 11.3
4.66 11.3
4.66 11.3
4.22 11.09
4.22 11.09
2.17 4.47
6.21 9.1
6.21 9.1
2. 14 4. 1
« ,_ , .
SAMPLE
IHC COLLECTION
(*) DATE
56.02 QB-flpr-«5
56.02 Oa-Apr-85
56.03 12-ftpr-fl8
56.03 12-Apr-aa
26.72 Ofl-Apr-85
26.72 Oa-Apr-B5
09-Feb-SB
09-Feb-88
09-Feb-88
100 17-Aug-B7
100 17-Auj-B7
19. 19 2CHtar-84
0.64 20-Ocl-B7
0.64 20-Oct-87
100 26-Feb-B5
SAL-
INITY
(o/ool
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U-l-UJt
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(WHO/CM)
850
850
550
550
1000
1000
1500
1500
1500
900
900
510
700
700
600
jvi mrbjUH
L/uttmw*.
-WW*. ! CfU3 1 11.9
TOTAL
MINI-
MUM
RESID. UNION- DO
HARDNESS
JM6/L AS
CaC03!
204
204
227
227
208
208
180
180
112
46
ALKALINITY
(MB/L AS
CaC03)
£30
230
223
223
285
265
204
204
134
202
CHLOR- I ZED M6/L)
pH 1NE NH3
OR *
(SU) (MB/L) 1MG/L) SAT.)
7.7
7.7
B.1
8.3
6.9 0.2 (0.1 87%
6.9 0.2 (0.
7.7
7.7
7.5 (0.1 (0.
7.5 (0.1 (0.
7.5 (0.1 (0.
7.2 0.8 (0.
7.2 0.8 (0.
7.1
7 0.4 (0.
7 0.4 (0.
8.1
85*
6
6
85*
97)1
91*
7
a
87*
7.2
6.4
: .... , _x ....-.-- :„ .v .--m .,-. ,, ,
OUT-
era 1
rHU.
1 NPBES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
46 OK 0026841 MIDUEST CITY NORTHSIDE
47 OK 0026841 HI WEST CITY NORTHSIDE
48 OK 0026841 001 WDHEST CITY NORTHSIDE
49 OK 0026841 001 HIDUEST CITY NORTHSIDE
50 OK 0026859 001 WDHEST CITY SOUTHSIDE
51 OK 0026859 001 HIDHEST CITY SOUTHSIDE
52 OK 0027553 001 OKLA. CITY-CHISHOLN CRK
53 OK 0027553 001 OKLA. CITY-CHISHDUI CRK
54 OK 0027553 001 OKLA. CITY-CH1SHDLM CSK
55 OK 0027931 001 WQORE
56 OK 0027931 001 HOORE
57 OK 0028134 001 OKNULBEE
56 OK 0029131 001 MJSKQGEE
59 OK 0029131 001 HUSKOSEE
60 OK 0030895 001 USA-FORT SILL
U-hLUtNl IUIJUIY
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT flS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DEDCOR- EFFLUENT
TfJ i TW 1fW£ TWDTTTl
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFRUENT EFRUENT LOEC NOEC
P. PRWELfiS 2 0 10
D. PU.EX 1 0 0
P. PROMEUS 8 25 80 45 12 6
D. PULEX 2 27 100 0
D. PULEX 2 15 0
P. PROMELAS 2 71 71 100 10
5ELENA5TRUM 4 0
P. PROKELPS 8 15
D. PULEX 2 0
P. PROHELflS 8 56 100 5 100 50
D. PULEX 299 100 10
D. PULEX 1 5
P. PRQMELAS 8 36 100 100 50 25
D. PULEX 2 35 29 100 20
P. PROItLAS 255 100 0
UIRNIS
NOTE: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
.
-
CI: 14-43; Ct)V=8.5*; SIB. MORT. IN DECH. EFFL.
CI: 22-34
-
-
STIMULATORY AT 12, 50 AND 100* EFFL.
NO SIG. EFFECT
NOTE SIG. MOST. IN DECHL EFFL.
ChV=71*
CI:7-10
24H COMPOSITE SAMPLE
CW35X; NOTE SIE. EFFECT IN DECHL. EFFL.
CI-.27-44I24H); 23-35S4BH)
CI: 3.7-7.1 (24 I 46H>; TR!M€D SPEflRMAN KflRBER
POTENTIAL
FOR
TklCTDCflM
lnblnc>in
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES SCUTE
NO BCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
I
U1
o
I
-------
1 . „ .imiuiJMji-.iir-r T i
OUT-
FALL
I NPDES 1 1
6! OK 0030895 001
62 OK 0030295 001
&3 OK 0030895 001
(A OK 0030395 001
(5 OK 0030295 001
66 OK 0030333
67 OK 003456* 002
68 OK 0035246 001
69 OK 0035246 001
70 OK 003K«6 001
71 OK 0036978
72 OK 003697S
73 OK 0036978 001
_cnpn tTV/DCftlllliF1 UDTTB TlHlONQTtnN ,,--,„. -----
FACILITY NAME
USA-fORT Silt
USA-FORT SILL
USA-FORT SILL
USA-FORT SILL
USA-FORT SIU
BARTLESViaE
OK ORDINANCE UQRKS AUTH.
LAUTON
LAUTON
LRUTON
OKU). CITY-N. CANADIAN
OKLA. CITY-N. CANADIAN
OKLA. CITY-N. CANADIAN
CIP 1 lY^QTinu
oiL LU«HIIUn
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING HATER NAME
9711 FORT SILL E. CflOC CREEK
9711 FORT SILL E. C«3£ CREEK
9711 FORT SILL E. CflOC CREEK
9711 FORT Sia E. CACHE CREEK
9711 FORT SILL E. CACHE CREEK
4953 BARTLESVILLE CflNEY RIVER
4953 CHATEAU CHATEAU CREEK
4952 LAUTON E. CflOC CREEK
4952 LAUTON E. CACHE CREEK
4952 LAUTON E. CflCHE CREEK
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY NORTH CANADIAN RIVER
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY NORTH CANADIAN RIVER
4952 OKLAHOMA CITY NORTH CANADIAN RIVER
STREAM FLOU
(CFS> PIPE FLOy
(TENTATIVE) (MB))
KEAN 7D10 (CAN Wilt.
49.95 0 2.14 4.1
49.95 0 £.14 4.!
49.95 0 2.14 4.1
49.95 0 2.14 4.1
49.95 0 2.14 4.1
860 1.55 7.21 30
54.7 0.72 1.92 6
148.4 1.38 14.95 21.87
148.4 1.3814.9521.87
148.4 1.38 14.95 21.87
54.44 89.55
54.44 89.55
54.44 89.55
SAMPLE
tw mi i FPTT nu
iw. LULLC.LIILM
(*) DATE
100 22-Kay-86
100 M-Dec-86
100 04-Dec-86
100 29-to~88
100 29-«ar-B8
87. B2 29-Api-86
80.52 02-Apr-85
94.38 19-Sep-84
94.4 £9-fcu-88
94.4 29-Mir-B8
29-fipr-*6
29-ftpr-66
09-May-«8
OTLUDlt PttVlWJDCMCJV.
SAL-
INTTV
tni i T
(o/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TQWTT
i HNCC
(IWO/CM)
800
1000
looo
600
600
750
900
BOO
800
800
1100
1100
1000
HARDNESS
(MR/! OQ
inu/L Ma
CaOI3)
198
m
203
215
215
222
128
124
227
227
204
204
240
ALKALINITY
{MR/I IK
»nD/L rd
CaC03)
98
91
91
105
105
130
IE2
182
175
175
177
177
860
CHARACTERISTICS-
f44
P"
-------
__————— FACILITY/RtaiVlWi HHItK ISI-UNnHllUN
« NPDES 1
1 n 0000132
?n OOXH3?
3 TX 0000353
4 TX 0000353
5 H 0000353
6 TX 0000353
7 TX 0000353
8 TX 0000540
9 TX 0000671
10 TX 0000710
11 TX 0000892
12 TX 0000892
13 TX 0000892
14 n 0000892
15 TX 0000892
OUT-
FALL
1
003
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USA-RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT
USA-flED RIVER AMY DEPOT
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
S.U. ELECTRIC POWER CO.
USAFHfELLY AFB
AMERICAN NORIT
BE1L HaiCOPTEH
BELL HaiCOPTER
8EU. HaiCOPTER
BaL HaiCOPTER
BaLffiJCOPTER
CTP i (voTtriw
sit* LAWillU"
CODE (CITY)
3471 TEXARKANA
3*71 TEIflRKANfl
3721 FORT WORTH
3721 FORT WORTH
3721 FORT WORTH
3721 FORT WORTH
3721 FORT WORTH
4911 LON6VIEW
3471 SAN ANTONIO
2819 MARSHALL
3721 HURST
3721 HURST
3721 HURST
3721 HURST
3721 HURST
RECEIVING WATER NAME
PANTHER CSREK
E. mm ELLIOTT CKEX
LAKE NORTH
LAKE WORTH
LflKE WORTH
LAKE WORTH
LAKE WORTH
LAKE CHEROKEE
LEON CREEK
POTTERS CfSEK
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R.
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R.
TR1B./W. FK. TRINITY R.
TRIB./W. FK. TRINITY R.
T8IB./W. FK. TRINITY R.
STREAK FLOW
(CFS) PIPE ROW
(TENTATIVE) (W»
MEAN 7010 MEAN IWX.
0 0 0.49 1.09
o o o.a 1,9*
1.32 3.61
1.32 3.61
1.32 3.6!
1.32 3.61
1.32 3.61
1980 6.8 216 469
84 3 1.38 3.87
51 3.89 0.86 2.18
1230 4.550.0730.617
1230 4.55 0.073 0.617
1230 4.55 0.073 0.617
1230 4.55 0.073 0.617
1230 4.550.0730.617
TLK*
Jm.
(*)
100
100
16
16
16
16
16
16
41.62
25.52
2.42
2.42
2.42
2,42
2.42
SWPLE
rnj i rrTTflW
LAA.UCI* i i un
DATE
21-fiug-*4
2*-Jun-K
lO-Seo-86
10-Sep-86
13-JuI-87
13-Jul-87
13-Jul-87
23-torfl6
lo-Jui-es
iO-Seo-fifi
n-fhirB&
18-tiu;-86
la-fluj-ee
13-Jul-87
13-M-87
SflL-
tMTTY
jni 1 1
to/oo)
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UHHO/CN)
550
BO
500
500
400
400
400
375
1450
8000
200
240
240
230
230
HARDNESS
(MB/L AS
CaC03)
84
90
142
142
132
132
132
132
130
100
67
87
86
66
ALKALINITY
CaC03)
128
30
93
92
79
79
79
87
80
59
41
41
41
41
nH
P"
!SU)
7.1
6.E
8.4
8.4
8.3
8.3
8.3
7.9
7.4
8
7.8
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
TOTBL
R£S!0.
04.0R-
(HS/L)
2.1
1.5
1.5
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.9
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(NG/L)
(6.1
0.3
0.3
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
1.4
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
«N1-
nuH
DO
(MB/L
OS X
SAT.)
0.1
86*
8.4
8
89*
8.7
6.1
81*
8.2
8.4
92*
8
91* i
1
.
i NPOES t
i n
e n
3 n
4 n
5 n
6 TX
7 n
8 TX
9 TX
10 TX
11 TX
12 TX
13 TX
14 H
15 TX
0000132
0000132
0000353
0000353
0000353
0000353
0000353
0000540
0000671
0000710
0000892
0000892
0000892
0000892
0000692
OUT-
£0t i
rHLL
i
003
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USA-RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT
USft-RED RIVER MMY DEPOT
GENERAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
68CRAL DYNAMICS
GENERAL DYNAMICS
SENERftL DYNAMICS
S.H. ELECTRIC POWER CO.
USAF-KELLY AFB
AMERICAN NORIT
BELL HaiCOPTER
BELL HELICOPTER
BELL HELICOPTER
BBJL HaiCOPTER
BELL HaiCOPTER
-!
;
!
1
!
I TEST SPECIES
: D.
i f.
! P.
: D.
PULE!
PRONELftS
PRWELAS
PULEX
! SELENflSTRUM
! D.
i P.
1 D.
: D.
1 C.
: D.
: D.
: P.
1 D.
! P.
PULEI
PRCMLAS
POO
PULEX
VARIEGATUS
PULEI
PULEI
PRWELftS
PULEX
PRCMELAS
TEST
LENGTH
TM
— tl-t-LUtNl iUJUWIT
LC50 MORTALITY
tu IA/W
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
1
7
7
2
4
2
8
1
1
7
2
2
7
2
8
0
30 90
21 100
33 100
35
0
10
0
0
10
63 100
25 12 100
55
3 (1 100
31 100
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
TWflTFT)
iflHtLil
EFFLUENT
0
40
0
0
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT SS
PERCENT
EFRUENT
LOECNOEC
50 25
25 10
50 25
50 25
50 25
oiwjns 1
1
HOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
OiV-CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUENT
LOW DO IN 100* EFR. ; AERATED
IMPORTANT NOTE: NORT. DATA FOR 50* EFFU| ChV«3Sl
MORT. DATA FOR 50* EFR.; CI (LCSO) ! 14-33; ChV-16*
-
ChV=35<
-
NO Sia EFFECT
-
-
NO SIBNIFICANT EFFECT
CI:4-8(24H)
CI: 19-33 (24H); 8-17(48H)i SEE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
JUPORTflNT «JTE: MORT. DATfl FOR 50* EFFL. ; ChY«35*
CI:NOT CflLCULflttE; NOTE HIGH TOXICITY
ChV=35*
POTENTIAL
FOR
TVCTBCQH
InblncHn
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
ND CHRONIC
NO (CUTE
«3 CHRONIC
NO ftCUTE
NO ACUTE
ND CHRONIC
YES SCUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
ND CHRONIC
I
tn
NJ
I
-------
rflCI LI TV /RECEIVING MTVTER IHrPHtlflTlOM -*— - —— — — — - — — > — —
t NPDES 1
16 TX 0000892
17 H 0000949
18 TX 0001007
19 H 0001201
20 TX 0001*65
21 n 0001465
22 TX 0002844
23 TX 0002933
24 TX 0002968
25 TX 0003522
26 TX 0003522
27 H 000365*
28 TX 0003697
29 TX 0003875
30 TX 0003891
OUT-
FALL
1
001
003
002
003
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
BELL HELICOPTER
TORS EASTMAN
TUGCO
TEMPLE-EASTEX
TYLER PIPE, INC.
TYLER PIPE, INC.
UNION CARBIDE
DOU CHEMICAL CO.
FIRESTONE RUBBER
AMOCO OIL CO.
AMOCO OIL CO.
POLYSAR EULF COAST
MARATHON OIL CO.
MONSANTO
TEMPLE-EASTEX
SIC LOCATION
OK (CITY)
37Z1 HURST
2869LONSV1EH
4911 DALLAS
2661 DIBOLL
3321 SAN
3321 SUAN
2869SEADRIFT
2869 LAPORTE
2822 ORANGE
2911 TEXAS CITY
2911 TEXAS CITY
2822 ORANGE
2911 TEXAS CITY
2869 ALVIN
2621 SILSBEE
RECEIVING HATER NAME
TRIB./U. FK. TRINITY
SflBINE RIVER
MOUNTAIN CREEK LftKE
NHXES RIVER
LITTLE SALINE CREEK
LITTLE SALINE CREEK
VICTORIA 8AR6E CANAL
SAN J3CINTO BAY
COW BAYOU
LOWER 6ALVESTQN BAY
LOWER GALVESTQN BAY
COM BAYOU
STREAM ROW
(CFS) PIPE FLDH
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
(CAN 7010 KEAN MAX.
R. 1230 4,55 0.073 0.617
932 70.0! 4.26 7.81
0.81 2.35
1573 5.62 1.41 4.9
32.68 2.5 0.269 0.733
32.68 2.5 0.292 0.749
4.67 13.68
1.1 1.63
8.63 0.0*2 0.8
13 20.7
13 20.7
8.63 0.*2 1.6* 7.13
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL 1.3 2.03
CHOCOLATE BAYOU
NECKES RIVER
39* 1.18 *.12 9.*1
3823 995.* 50.** 63.33
IMC
«>
2,42
8.62
16
28
14.29
15.33
a
8
96.72
8
8
98.38
8
8*.*
7.28
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
13-Jul-B7
23-Sep-fi6
17-5ep-fl6
07-flpr-66
12-Jun-S*
12-Jun-84
08-Oec-«6
03-M-B4
15-Ort-8*
10-ftug-87
tft-Aug-87
06-Nov-S*
15-Jul-86
23-J«r85
22-Ort-86
FFFllENT PHYSICfl
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
£
0
0
0
0
28
1
*
L
0
2
0
1
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
230
400
2600
790
BOO
42000
1900
2*00
2*00
1300
1700
1500
2400
HARDNESS
(H6/L AS
CaC03)
86
120
52
102
64
*2
264
26*
**
290
12*
171
L/CHEMCM. CHftRaCTERISTICS
ALKALINITY
95» CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
ChV-CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
ChVMT*
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT; NOTE HIGH SALINITY
-
EFa. TESTED 40M AFTER COLLECTION
SPECIAL EPA/TIC STIW-SEE REPORT
SPECIAL EPA/TMC STUDY-SEE REPORT
SfiLTS ADDED) PPRT OF EPA SPECIAL STUDY
-
-
Chl6-24j ChV=17*j SAL. CNTtt. NOT RUN; HIGH NK3
CI: 30-43; HIBH W3; KURT. IN SALINITY CONTRa
-
CI:35-42(2*H); I9-32I48H)
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
lycmcflH
IribiRcHn
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES fiCUTE
NO SCUTE
I
Ul
OL)
I
-------
OUT-
r/u»ii t-rv /ocrr?
— — "TMUiLl 1 T/KtLtJ
VING UATER 1NFORMAT10N-
FOX SIC LOCATION
1 NPBES 1 1 FACILITY NAME CODE (CITY)
31 TX 0003891 001 TEWLE-EASTEX
3£TX 0003891 001 TmE-EflSTEI
33 TX 0003891 001 TEWLE-EASTEX
34 TX 0003891 001 TEHPLE-€ASTO
35 TX 0004201 003 AMERICAN PETROFIMP.
36 TI 0004669 001 DUPONT
37 TX 0004669 001 DUPONT
38 TI 0004715 004 ALCOA
39 TX 0004715 006 ALCOA
40 TI 0004821 001 AMOCO CHEMICAL CO.
41 TX 0004855 002 BULF CHEM.I METALLURGICAL
42 TI 0004855 002 GULF CHEM.I METALLUREICAL
43 TX 0004871 007 SHELL OIL CO.
44 TI 0004871 007 SHELL OIL CO.
45 TX 0004896 001 CAMERON IRON WORKS
2621 SILSBEE
2631 SILS8EE
2621 SILSBEE
2621 SILSBEE
2911 GROVES
2869 BEAUMONT
2869 BEAUMDNT
3334 POINT COMFORT
3334 POINT COMFORT
2821 ALVIN
3339 TEXAS CITY
3339 TEXAS CITY
2911 DEER PARK
2911 DEER PARK
3312 BUFFALO BAYOU
RECEIVINB UATER NAME
NECHES RIVER
NECHES RIVER
NEOCS RIVER
NECHES RIVO
NECHES RIVER
NECHES RIVER
NECHES RIVER
LAVACA BAY
LAVACA BAY
CHOCOLATE BAYOU
UPPER 6ALVESTON BAY
UPPER 6ALVESTQN BAY
HOUSTON SHIP CHflNHfl.
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
KATY
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
3823 995.4
3823 995. 4
3823 995.4
3823 995.4
3823 1060.5
3823 1060.5
3823 1060.5
30.71 1.89
275.5 22.65
PIPE aou
(MSD)
MEAN MAX.
50.44 53.33
50.44 63.33
50.44 63.33
50.44 63.33
1.191 2.9*
7 21.9
7 21.9
3.65 6.99
1.05 5
4.65 7.6
0.15 1.5
0.15 1.5
5.75 8.6
5.75 8.6
0.28 3.49
IMC
(*)
7.28
7.28
7.88
7.28
0.28
1.01
1.01
12
12
79.23
8
8
30
30
100
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
22-Cct~a6
ffi-Oct-86
26-Jan-B8
26-Jarr88
31-Jan-«5
29-Apr-87
29-Apr-87
!5-Jarr85
15-J*n-85
24-Jul-86
19-Au}-66
19-fiug-86
30-Jol-86
30-Jul-86
06-*jg-85
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
1
1
0
0
0
5
5
23
1
2
4
4
2
2
EFFLl*
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
IUMHO/CM)
2400
2400
1600
1600
2250
2900
2900
28000
BOO
2100
4000
4000
2900
2900
800
JUT PHYSICS
HARDNESS
(MB/L AS
CaCQ3>
171
171
110
1800
73
228
1625
1625
282
£82
78
L/CHEMICW.
ALKALINITY
(M6/L AS
CaC03)
212
212
47
110
104
81
33
33
255
255
278
3«RflC
PH
(SUI
7.6
7.6
7.5
7.5
6.6
7.9
7.9
8.2
5.9
8.2
7.9
7.9
8.1
8.1
8.1
TOHSTIt
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
V
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
0.4
0.4
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MI*
DO
(MB/L
OR *
SAT.)
81*
79*
6.4
92*
91*
8.6
8.4
91*
91*
8.4
87*
8.3
6.7
(
1
I
!
OUT- !
ffa I 1
rHU. i
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME ',
31 TX 0003891 001 TEMPLE-CASTEX I
32 H 0003891 001 TEMPLE-EASTEX 1
33 TX 0003891 001 TEMPLE-EASTEX !
34 TX 0003891 001 TEMPLE-iASTEX I
35 TX 000*201 003 AMERICAN PETROFINA !
36 TI 000*669 001 DUPONT i
37 TX 000*669 001 DUPONT !
38 TI 000*715 00* ALCOA !
39 TX 0004715 006 ALCOA !
40 TX 0004821 001 AMOCO CHEMICAL CO. !
41 TX 0004855 002 BULF CHEM.I NETfUUfBICAL!
42 TI 0004855 002 GULF CHEM.I MHALLURSICAL1
43 TX 000*87! 007 SHELL OIL CO. 1
*4 n 0004871 007 SHELL OIL CO. 1
45 TX 0004896 001 CAMERON IR» IORKS i
TEST SPECIES
tZRIODAPHNIA
P. PROMELAB
D. PULEX
BELENASTRM
D. PULEX
C. VARIE6ATU3
P. PROMELAS
M. BAHIA
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEI
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEX
0. PULEX
TEST
LENGTH
TU
DAYS 24
8
7
2
4
1
8
8
1
1
7
7
2
7
1
1
— crrLUCn i i UA IL.L 1 1~ ' " ~ """ •
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN 100* PERCENT
LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFFLUENT
W\ AAV i NQTrn - ii i» in mm
(H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
0
5
10
20
0 0
10
66 100 100 50
0
0
0
15
5
0
0
0 0
*
NOTES: CI«95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
CMWHONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFaUENT
NO SIB. EFFECT
NO SIB. EFFECT
NO SIG. MORT.
STIMULATORY! 6-50* EFFUj NO SIB EFFECT IN 100*
CHEMISTRY OF PERMIT PARAMETERS AVAILABLE
NO SIG. EFFECT
ChV*71*; NO SIG. NORT. IN 5 0/00 SALINITY CONTROL
-
-
NO SI6NIFICANT EFFECT
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
-
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
f fclCTQtflM
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
MO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
MO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO (CUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO flCUTE
1
I
t_n
-------
OUT-
FALL
1 NPOES I 1 FACILITY NAME
46 TX 0005061 001 90CDYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER
47 TI 0005096 101 KOPOCRS CO., INC.
46 TX 0005380 001 BOfflA-BSYPOTT (CENTRAL)
49 TX 0005835 Oil STAR ENTERPRISES
50 TX 0005835 001 STAR ENTERPRISES
51 TX 0005860 001 CHEMICAL EXCHANGE
52 TX 0006025 101 CELANESE CHEMICAL
53 TI 0006025 101 CELANESE CHEMICAL
54 TX 0006025 101 CELANESE CHEMICAL
55 n 0006025 001 CELANESE CHEMICAL
56 TX 0006025 101 CELANESE CHEMICAL
57 TX 0006025 001 CELANESE CHEMICAL
58 TX 0006025 001 CELANESE CHEMICAL
59 TI 0006025 001 CELANESE CHEMICAL
60 TX 0006033 003 SOLTEK POLYMER CORP.
t-MLlLI IY/K£U:
IVirfe WitH JWUIfiTtUUV-
STREAM FLU
(CFS)
)
PIPE aw
(TENTATIVE) (MBD)
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY)
£822 BEAUMONT
SteS HOUSTON
4353BAYPOrr
2911 PORT ARTHUR
2911 PORT ARTHUR
2865 6ALENA PARK
2869 BISHOP
2869 BISHOP
2869 BISHOP
£869 BISHOP
2869 BISHOP
2869 BISHOP
2869 BISHOP
2869 BISHOP
2821 DEER PARK
RECEIVING WATER NAME
KIDD BULLY/DINN B.
KJFf ALO 8AYOU
BAYPORT OUGALV. BAY
ALLIGATOR B. /TAYLOR B.
ALLIGATOR B. /TAYLOR B.
PANTHER CREEK TO HSC
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
SAN FERNANDO CREEK
PHILLIPS DITCH TO HSC
MEAN 7B10 (CAN MAX.
146
0.8 1.92 2.31
655 37.3 0.014 0.061
626
626
7.67 15
3.1 8.66 11.85
3.1 17.227.65
855 2.21 0.026 0.066
25.13
25.13
25.13
25.13
25.13
25.13
25.13
25.13
.02 0.41 0.67
.01 0.41 0.67
.02 0.41 0.67
.02 0.41 0.67
.02 0.41 0.67
.02 0.41 0.67
.02 0.41 0.67
.02 0.41 0.67
855 37.3
SAMPLE
1HC COLLECTION
(*) DATE
78.81 04-feb-85
30 30-Jul-65
8 30-Apr-eS
81.58 tO-Dee-84
89.58 l(M)ec-84
30 25-Jin-84
38.38 08-Jan-a5
38.38 02-Frt-87
38.38 02-fe!>-87
38.38 02-Fet>-87
38.38 02-Fel>-8?
38.38 21-Sep-87
38.38 21-Sep-87
38.38 21-S«r8?
8 23-Jul-85
— — ' — — — — " • — - -'tlf r- fJUKJN 1 imiami
SAL-
INITY
(o/oo)
2
4
0
1
2
3
3
3
3
1
1
*
1
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/Ot)
900
2300
2200
2600
1800
3800
5000
5000
5000
5000
500
500
500
3200
HARDNESS
(MS/L AS
CaCQ3>
144
840
328
748
104
122
384
384
384
384
320
320
320
212
&./ un&n * (»»«_ i_r»*KML* i en i =t t ti*a~:™™-~" i
I1NI-
ALKALINITY
(*S/L AS
CaC03»
140
68
244
33
144
MOOO
167
167
167
167
117
117
117
126
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
pH INE
(SU) (MB/L)
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.5
S
6.4 (0.1
8.4
7.9 (0.1
7.9 (0.1
7.9 (0.1
7.9 (0.1
7.9 (0.1
7.9 (0.1
7.9 (0.1
6.3
MUM
UNION- DO
1ZED (MB/L
M43 OR X
(N6/L» SAT. )
8.4
6.3
8.4
7
6.2
(0.1 8.4
(0.1 89*
(0.1
(0. 1 81%
0.1 7.9
0.1 9ftt
0.1
8.6
i
I
OUT-
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
46 TX 0005061 001 GOODYEAR TIRE AND HUB8EB
47 TX 00050% 101 HOPPERS CO., INC.
48 TX 0005380 001 6CWDA-BAYPORT (CENTRAL)
49 TI 0005835 Oil STAR ENTERPRISES
50 TX 0005635 001 STAR ENTERPRISES
51 TX 0005660 001 CHEMICAL EXCHANGE
52 TX 0006025 101 CELANESE D€MICAL
53 TX 0006025 101 CELANESE CHEMICAL
54 TX 0006025 101 CELANESE CHEMICAL
S3 TI 0006025 001 CELANESE OOlICflL
36 TX 0006023 101 CELANESE CHEMICAL
57 TI 0006025 001 COANESE CHEMICAL
58 TX 0006025 001 CELANESE CHEMICAL
59 TI 0006025 001 CELANESE CHEMICAL
60 TX 0006033 003 SQLTEI POLYMER CORP.
*
>,
',
•
I TEST SPECIES
! CERIdMPHNlA
1 D. PULEX
1 D. PULEX
: o. PULEX
! D. PULEX '
I D. PULEX
! D. PULEI
1 D. PULEX
I P. PROMELAS
1 ft. PUNCTULATA
i SELENASTRUM
! D. PULEX
! P. PRONELAS
1 SELENASTRUM
! D. PULEX
crn.ucm IUAIIJ
TEST
LENGTH LC50
Yll
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC
7
2 57 41
1
1
1
1
2 92 59
1 45
B
1.5H MO
4 (6
2
8
4 37
1
1 T
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
IN IOOX PERCENT
MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFRUENT
WIASW fiiAiTr-n
EFFLUENT EFRUENT LOEC HDEC
0
100
0
0
0
0
95 100
60
15
0
10
75 25 12
5 0
ujrrt.ii3 • —
NOTES: Cl-95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
DiVKHRDNIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT (SURVIVAL/REPRODUCTION)
Cl: 49-67 (24H); 33-51 (48H)
NO HORT. IN DILUTIONS » SALINITY CONTROL
-
INCOMPLETE EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY
CI:50-70(48H)
CI: 18-100} UPSTREAM MATER USED FOR DILUTION
tPSTREW HBTER USED FOR DILI/TICK
SALTS ADDED; PflttT OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
UPSTREAM HATER USED FOR DILUTION
-
NO SIS. EFFECT
CHVM7X
-
i
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTDCAM
INSTnEflH
EFFECTS
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
I
U1
-------
rnrTi tTV/RFrnutwr; ufiTTS INFflftNOTTflW— — — — • i — EFFLIJC
i " - - T'HLlLi i T/Ktwt 1 ViPiU HHlcn JHTUWnMt iiw<
t NPDES 1
61 n 0006033
62 TX 0006033
63 TI 0006068
64 TI 0006064
65 n 0006064
66 TX 0006297
67 H 0006297
68 n 0006327
69 TI 0006327
70 TI 0006327
71 H 0006483
72 TX 0007048
73 TX 0007048
74 TI 0007056
75 TX 0007056
OUT-
FALL
1 FACILITY NAME
001 SOLTEX POLYMER COOP.
Ml SOLTEX P01VMCS COW.
001 BRCO POLYKK
001 ROM 1 HAAS
001 ROHM ( HAAS
STREAM F
(CFS)
LOW
PIPE aw
(TENTATIVE) (MGD)
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY)
2821 DEER PARK
SKI rees pftRK
2869 HOUSTON
2869 DEER PARK
£869 DEER PARK
001 NATL. DISTILLERS 1 CHEN. 2821 PORT ARTHUR
001 NATL. DISTILLERS i 0€M. 2821 PORT ARTHUR
208 DUPONT-SABINE RIVER
202 DUPONT-SABINE RIVER
202 DUPONT-SflBINE RIVER
001 DOW CHEMICAL
001 LUBRIZOL CORP.
001 LUBRIZOL CORP.
001 U.E. GYPSUM CO.
001 U.S. EYPBUM CO.
WORKS 8969 ORANGE
WORKS 2869 ORANGE
WORKS 2869 ORANGE
2869 FREE PORT
2869 HOUSTON
2869 HOUSTON
2631 GALENA PARK
2631 SALENA PARK
RECEIVING WATER NAME
PHILLIPS DITCH TO HSC
PXILLIPS DITCH TO HSC
TRIE. TO HOUSTON EC
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNa
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
SABINE RIVER
SABINE RIVER
SABINE RIVER
BRAZOS RIVER (TIDAL)
PATRICK BAYOU TO HSC
PATRICK BAYOU TO HSC
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNa
MEAN
548.7
855
460
1014
1014
626
626
8313
8313
8313
8061
1014
1014
1014
1014
7QIO MEAN MAX.
37.3 1
37.3 1
i.l 0.8460.313
37.3 3.81 9.82
37.3 3.81 9.82
3.1
3.1
889 9.22 13.94
B89 9.22 13.94
889 9.22 13.94
237 510 723
37.3 0.63 1.89
37.3 0.63 1.89
37.30.137 0.27
37.30.137 0.27
SAMPLE
IHC COLLECTION
(X) DATE
30 24-Jul-85
30 24-Jul-BS
30 S3-flpr-fl4
30 31-JM-84
30 31-Jan-84
8 03-Drc-64
8 03-D«-84
3 29-Apr-87
3 e9-Apr~S7
3 19-AUJ-87
100 !6-Sep~83
30 3Q-Bpr-84
30 a-Rpr-85
30 21-Jul-BS
30 21-Jui-K
SAL-
INITY
io/oo)
0
0
4
0
0
5
5
26
26
22
2
2
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UWO/CM)
1800
1800
6300
3000
2900
7900
7900
45000
40000
30000
1700
1700
NT HHYSICnL/OOHCflL OWWCTERISTICS
HARDNESS
(MG/L AS
CaCQ3)
172
172
ISO
360
230
240
240
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
135
135
13S
380
300
330
330
PH
(SU!
8
8
7.6
7.5
7.5
8.1
8.1
7.8
7.1
8.4
8.4
TOTAL
RES1D. UNION-
CHLOR- 1ZED
IKE NH3
(MG/L) (MG/L!
(0. 1 0. 8
(0.1 0.8
0.2 0.3
0.2 0.3
MINI-
MUM
DO
tMG/L
OR t
SAT.)
7.8
7.8
7.5
84*
83*
8.2
5.9
91*
8.6
en
i
OUT-
cat t
rnUL
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NPJC
61 TI 0006033 001 SOLTES POLYKR CORP.
62 TI 0006033 001 SOLTE1 POLYMER CORP.
63 TI 000606S 001 ARCO POLYHERS
64 n 0006084 001 ROW t HAAS
65 TI 0006084 001 ROHM 1 HAAS
66 n 0006297 001 NflTL DISTILLERS i CHE*.
67 TI 0006297 001 NATL, DISTILLERS 1 CHEN.
68 H 0006327 202 DUPQNT-SA8INE RIVER WORKS
69 TI 0006327 202 DUPONT-SABINE RIVER WORKS
70 TI 0006327 202 DUPQNT-5ABIN£ RIVER WORKS
71 TX 0006483 001 DOW CHEMICAL
72 TI 0007048 001 LUBRIZOL CORP.
73 TX 0007048 001 LUBRIZOL CORP.
74 TI 0007056 001 U.S. SYPSU) CO.
75 TX 0007056 001 U.S. SYPSW CO.
CHRWIC
MORTALITY EFFECT ftS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENGTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLOR- EFRUENT
TEST SPECIES BAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEI 1 0 0
CERIOOAPHMIA 7 0
D. PUS 2 79 75 95
P. PROMELAS 4 76
D. PULEX 2 41
D. POO 1 0
CERIDDAPHNIA 7 5 100 75
C. VARIEGATUS 8 10
P. PROMELAS 8 66 100 100 50
A. PUNCTULATA 1.5H 5.8
K. ALMVRA 1 0
H. BfiHIA 2 70 60 100
M. BflHIA 2 71 19 100 100
P. PRfflELAS 7 0
D. PULEI 1 0
NOTES: CI=95* CWflDEfCE IffTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFaUEKT
-
NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT (SURVIVAL/REPRODtCTION)
VALUES QUESTIONABLE (SALINITY CONTROL NOT RUN)
96H-LC50i NO EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY DATA
NO EFaUENT CHEMISTRY DATA
-
ChV»87*j REPRQ. IN 100* EFFL. LESS THAN CONTROL
NO SIS. EFFECT
ChV=71*
SflLTS AOSEDj PAST OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
-
-
C!.-!2-3'M48H>
NO SIBNIFICfiNT EFFECT
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
TUCTDCAM
INolnCMn
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
VES flCUTE
YES OCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
-------
It
1 NPDESI
76 H 0007293
77 TJ 0667353
78 TX 0007323
79 H 0007323
80 TI 0007323
81 H 0007421
82 TX 0007439
83 n 0007439
84 TX 0007552
85 n 0007689
66 TX 0007889
87 TX 0007889
88 TI 0007889
89 TX 0007889
90 TX 0007889
_
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
101
001
FACILITY NAME
DUPQNT
Sft
6AF CORP.
60F CORP.
Off CORP.
ARCO CHEMICAL
SDS BIOTECH 0X9.
SDS BIOTECH CORP.
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
USN-CORPUB CHRISTI NAS
_„ «»«*>•* if.v> iifwra itmOMftTtr
— ~ — —— '"fUC I L 1 TY /HfcQ: I " I NB HHTfcR IW-UW1HI JWr~
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING HATER NAME
2879 LAPORTE SAN JACINTO BAY
BUS TEXAS CITY MOSES LAKE
2869 TEXAS CITY MOSES LAKE
8869 TEXAS CITY POSES LAKE
2869 TEXAS CITY HDSES LflKE
2821 DEER PARK TRIB. TO PEBBY LAKE
2869 HOUSTON 6REENS BAYOU TO KSC
2869 HOUSTON GREEKS BAYOU TO KSC
2821 PASADENA HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
STREAM ROU
(CFS) PIPE ROM
(TENTATIVE) (MGO!
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
3.49 11.14
0.13 0.33
0.19 0.33
0.19 0.33
0.19 0.33
480 1.1 0.438 1.13
228 0.71 0.57 0.9
228 0.71 0.57 0.9
855 2.21 2.85 7
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
0.849 .543
IMC
<*)
8
16
16
16
16
30
55.44
55.44
30
a
8
8
8
8
8
.
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
19-fiug-85
17-JW-B4
24-Fett-87
24-f*b-87
E4-feb~fl7
23-M»y-84
29-Jtin-87
29-Jurr67
12-Dec~83
23-Jul-86
23-Ju!-86
17-Nar-a?
28-Aor-B7
28-Apr~87
28-A0I-87
SAL-
INITY
lo/oo)
4
2
2
z
0
2
2
a
4
2
— CFFXUENT PHVSICft
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/00
6000
2100
2100
2100
8000
8000
1200
1200
1000
1100
1000
HARNESS
(M6/L AS
CaC03)
1»3
300
300
300
145
145
190
190
L/OOHCM. CHBWCttRISrriCS
ALKALINITY
(MB/L AS
CiC03)
25
124
!24
124
37
37
122
122
pH
(SU)
6.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.5
7.5
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.5
7.6
TOTAL
RESIO.
CHLOR-
INE
(H6/L)
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
(0.
0.8
0.8
0.6
(0.1
0.6
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
(0.1
0.1
MINI-
MUM
DO
(NB/L
OR X
SflT. )
B.E
8.3
85*
8.3
90*
8.1
91*
7.2
91*
91*
I
U1
i
OUT-
£01 1
rHLL
1 NPCES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
76 TX 0007293 001 DUPOKT
77 H 0007323 001 BAF
78 TX 0007323 001 BAF CORP.
79 TX 0007323 001 BAF CORP.
80 TX 0007323 001 BAF CORP.
81 TX 0007421 001 ARCO CHEMICAL
82 TI 0007439 001 SDS BIOTECH CORP.
83 n 0007439 001 SDS BIOTECH CORP.
84 TX 0007552 001 PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
85 TI 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
86 TI 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
87 n 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
69 TX 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
89 n 0007889 101 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
90 TI 0007889 001 USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NAS
ErrLUCfll IIM1LI IT1 ' """•"" '" '" —
CHRONIC
MORTALITY EFFECT AS
TEST IN 100* PERCENT
LENBTH LC50 MORTALITY DECHLDR- EFRUENT
* M f u ifYVr TMQTTTl - . <«, .
TEST SPECIES DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFRUENT EFRUENT LOEC NOEC
D. PULEX 2 31 22 100 100
D. PULEX 1 0
D. PULEX 2 0
C. VARIE8ATUB 8 5
A. PUNCTULATA 1.5H MO
D. PULEX 1 0
P. PROMEUS 8 73 70 25 12
D. PULEX 2 93 55
D. PULEX 2 0
P. PROMEUS 7 85 85 10 100 75
D. PULEX 16 100 0
A. PUNCTULATA 1.5H 3.1
A, PUNCTULATA 1.5H 7.2
C. VARIEBATUS 8 5
C. VfiRIEBfiTUS 8 tt 100 100 50
uncn i &
NOTES! C!*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChVCHRONlC VALUE IN PERCENT EFRUEKT
CI:24-40(24H); 17-29<48H)j 4 o/oo CONTROL DIED
«) EFFL. CHEMISTRY
PART OF EPfl S=ECI«. STUDY
NO SIB. EFFECTj PflRT OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
SALTS ADDED; W3T OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
NO EFRUOiT CHEMISTRY DflTA
CHV=17*
PIPE FLOW FOR OUTFALL 101
NO EFRUENT CHEMISTRY
CI:76-%; CMM7*
CI:4-8(24H)
SALTS ADDED; PART OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
SflLTS ADDED! WRT OF SPECIAL STUDY
SALTS flDDED; PflRT OF SPECIAL STUDY
ChV=7U; SALTS ftDBED; POST OF SPECIfiL STUDY
POTENTIAL
FOR
, -Lff-m-nf-f^
EFFECTS
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES (CUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
-------
fflfTI TTV JfDT*Cf Hf Uf* UfiTTO f UCnQfctHT !flM.
•*' • •"" - -"'-?' Hi- ILi ' * /"CLclVINb MM 1C" JtWrUWRHt iUPr
STREW FLO«
(CFS) PIPE aow
1 NPDES 1
91 TX 0007889
9? TI 0007883
93 TX 0007889
94 n 0007889
95 TX 0007889
% TX 0007889
97 TX 0007869
98 n 0007889
99 H 0007889
100 TX 0007889
101 TX 0007889
102 TI 0007889
103 TX 0007889
104 TX 0007889
105 TX 0007897
OUT-
FflLL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
(TENTflTIVE) (H6D)
FACILITY NAME
USN-CORPUS CHRIST! MAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI MAS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI HAS
USN-CORPUS CHRIST! NflS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NftS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NftS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NftS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NftS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NftS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NflS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NftS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NRS
USN-CORPUS CHRIST! NRS
USN-CORPUS CHRISTI NftS
ALLIED CORP.
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING URTER NAME
374! CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRIST! CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRIST! CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
3741 CORPUS CHRISTI CORPUS CHRISTI BflY
2821 ORCHARD COU BflYQU
MEflN 7010 frW MAX.
0.849
0.849
0.849
0.849
O.B49
0.849
0.849
0.849
0.849
0.849
0.843
0.849
0.849
0.849
8.H 0.042 0.59
1.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
.543
3.77
SAKPLE
1HC COLLECTION
<« DflTE
8 aa-flpr-87
8 22-Jun-87
8 22-Jun-87
B 22-Jun-B7
8 £2-Jurr-87
B 22-Jun-B7
8 22-Jun-87
8 23-J32 )32
17.5 8.8
(2.2 <2.Z
7.5 5
HO HO
HO HO
5 2.5
HO HO
10 100 50
0
ujrv^n | a " !l
NOTES: CI"95!t CONFIDENCE INTERVflL BROUND LCSO
ChV-CHRONIC VftLUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
SALTS fiDDED; PflRT OF SPECIRL STUDY
SflLTS BODED; 30% HORT. IN 32» EFFL)ChV-5.6*
POST-CHLORINRTED (FINRL)j SRLTS RDDED; OiV=6.1lt
PQST-CHLORINflTe (FINAL) i ChV»3.5*| SflLTS PJ8ED
9X Km. IN 32* EFFUi NO SIS. EFFECT flT 3» fTFl
DECHLORINflTEDj ChV»12.4; SflLTS RDDED
PRECHtORINBTEB; CI:0-&2; SflLTS fiOOED
PtBT-CHLORIKflTED (FINHL! ; SflLTS fiDOE2| ChV«6. I*
PRECHLORINHTEC; SRLTS ft&DED; P3RT OF SPEC. STUDY
POST-CHLQHINflTE!) (FINflL) ;SflLTS MHO; SPEC. STUDY
PHEOtORINRTED; ChV=3.5; SPECIflL STU)Y
POST-CaORINflTED (FINflL); PflRT OF SPECIflL STUDY
DiV=71X
C!:ll-17(a*H); 7-15I48H)
NO SIS. FFECT IN REPRODUCTION
POTENTIfli
FOR
thJCTDCAH
iNSTtaflH
EFFECTS
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES DfflWIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHBON2C
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES BCUTE
NO CHRONIC
I
U1
CD
I
-------
I
"
(
,
,
; t NPDES I
!!06 n 0008907
1107 n 0006907
noa n oooe907
! 109 TX 0008907
1110 TX 0008907
1111 H 0009075
1112 TX 0009075
1113 H 0009073
1114 n 0009148
!115 n 0009146
1116 n 0009181
:U7 TX 0009181
il!8 TX 0022527
!119 TX 0022527
!120 TX 0022608
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
DUPOKT
DUPONT
DUPONT
DUPQNT
DUPONT
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
SID RICHARDSON CARBON
SID RICHARDSON CARBON
TRA-TEN MLE CREEK
TERRELL
USAF-LAUEHJN flFS
rtwt i TTV teff^i
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY)
£869 IIOESIDE
£869 INGLESIDE
2869 INGLESIDE
2869 INGLESIDE
2869 INGLESIDE
2911 BORGER
2911 BORSER
2911 BORSER
2911 BORBER
2911 BORSER
2822 BOR6EX
2822 BORSER
4952 FERRIS
4952 TERRELL
9711 VAL VERDE CO.
VIU5 UCTEfi IMRlflNRTIQW-
RECEIVING UATER NAME
CORPUS CHRISTI m
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
CORPUS CHRISTI BAY
7
?
7
E. DIION CREEK
E. DIXON CREEK
TRIB. TO CANADIAN R.
TRIB. TO CANADIAN R.
TEN MILE CREEK
TRIB. TO KINGS CREEK
TRIB. TO SACATOSA CRK
STREAM FLEW
(CFS!
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7Q10
1.46 0
1.46 0
1.46 0
0.27 0
0.27 0
0.1
0.1
52.25 0.4
17.25 0
PIPE aw
(NED)
MEAN MAX.
2,66 6.14
2.66 6.14
2.66 6.14
2.66 6.14
2.66 6.14
5,08 7.14
5.08 7.14
0.39
0.39
11.9 30.22
2.14 5.93
0.57 1
I WC
(*)
a
8
a
a
8
100
100
100
100
100
85
85
97.88
100
100
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
02-Sep-86
E8-Apr-87
£8-Apr-87
S8-flpr-87
16-Sep-87
02-Jun-87
02-Juft-87
02-Jun-87
14-Ort-87
14-Oct-87
14-Oct-87
14-Oct-87
26-Su5-8B
23-Sep-86
30-«ov-87
- •— SJT1JUEKT PHYSlCflL/CMEMICflL CWIWCTtMSTICS— • — '
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
6
6
6
10
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/00
7500
7500
7500
19000
1100
1100
1100
1700
1700
3000
3000
900
600
790
HARDNESS
(MG/L AS
CaC03)
325
325
325
92
110
ALKALINITY
(MG/L AS
CaCtB)
67
67
67
167
7
pH
(SU)
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.5
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.6
7.6
9.4
9.4
7.5
6.1
8.2
TOTAL
RESID.
CHLOR-
INE
(MG/L!
(0.1
(O.I
(0.1
(0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
3.2
1.5
(0.1
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
(0.1
(O.I
(0.1
(0.1
0.2
(0.1
1.8
MINI-
MUM
DO
(HG/L
OR *
SAT.)
92*
9W
87%
8.2
8.2
94*
8.2
89%
8.3
8.2
8
i i ' LTTLycni IUAIL1IT
!
!
!
!
I 1 NPDES 1
!106 n 0008907
!107 T« 0008907
!108 TI 0008907
! 109 TJ 0008907
1110 TX 0008907
1111 n 0009075
!112 TX 0009075
1113 TJ 0009075
1114 TI 0009148
1115 n 0009146
U16 TI 0009161
1117 TI 0009181
1118 n 002232?
1119 n 0022527
!120 TI 0022608
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
DUPONT
DUPONT
DUPONT
DUPONT
DUPQNT
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
SID RICHARDSON CARBON
SID RICHARDSON CARBON
TRft-TEN NILE CREEK
TERRELL
USAF-LAUH.1N ftFB
1
!
1
I
! TEST SPECIES
i A.
1 C.
! C.
! A,
1 C.
! P.
I D.
RJNCTULATA
PARVU-A
VARIEEATUS
PUNCTULATA
VARIEBATUS
PROMELAS
PULEX
1 SELENASTRUM
1 D.
I P.
! D.
t P.
! D.
t D.
I 0.
PULEX
PRONELAS
PULEX
PRQMQJS
PULEX
PULEX
PULEI
TEST
LENGTH
IN -
LC50
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC
J.5H
7
a
1.5H
9
8
2
4
2
8
2
8
2
2
2
5.9
8.7
!70
33
16 16
20
54
76
4 4
21 £0
MORTALITY
IN 100(
EFFLUENT
10
15
100
100
98
5
too
10
70
100
100
0
MORTALITY
IN 100X
0ECHLOR-
INflTED
EFFLUENT
100
0
9
100
10
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOEC NOEC
50 25
12 6
100 50
100 50
umncNis
NOTES! C!=9S< CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
CtiV*CHRQN!C VflLUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
SALTS ADDED; PART DF EM SPEC. STUDY
SALTS ADDEDj PART OF EPA SPECIAL STUDY
NO 516. EFFECT; PART OF EPA SPEC. STUDY
SSLTS BODED; PART OF EPA SPECIAL STUDY
NO SI6. EFFECT
PERMIT D1SCQNT. ; OiV«35<
PERMIT BISCWT.; a* APPARENTLY STORKMATER
PERMIT DISCONT.; ChV»9*
NO SIG. MOST.
ChV=71*
NO 516. MOST.
ChV*71*
NOTE MORT IN OECHL. EFFL
-
SEW1GE i UiPESM. PAINT-STRIPPING HfiSTESTREAKS
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO CHKW1C
NO CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES CHHWC
NO aCUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES (CUTE
YES ACUTE
NO (KIKE
I
tn
-------
*•«/*»» f Tw lOKrVI iff k*? UATCD . .*-^nmvr .p^i — „ n n
. i i I, i n. i 't HLiLi II fibril* I"' " wtltn JNTUnrwl 1 11*.
I
i
,'
:
: « NPOES i
M2I TX 0022608
1122 TI 0023001
1123 TX 0023001
J 12* TI 002309*
!125 TX 0023*18
i 126 TX 0023931
!127 n 0023931
1128 TX 002*228
1129 n 002*228
!130 TI 002*309
:131 TX 002*309
1132 n 002*325
1133 TX 0024368
1 134 n 002*368
1135 TX 002*678
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USAF-LAUBLIN fFB
VERMIN
VERNON
UVALDE
KINBSVILLE
NTMW-RICHARDBON
NTMMHIICHAROSON
STEPHENVILLE
STEPHEMVILLE
LUFKIN
LUFKIN
aHcnnnN
JASPER
JASPER
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
SIC LOCATION
OK (CITY!
9711 VOL VERDE CO.
49SVERMM
4952 VERNON
4952 UVALDE
4952 KINBSVILLE
4952 RICHARDSON
4952 RICHARDSON
*952 STEPHENVILLE
4952 STEPHENVILLE
*952 LUFKIN
4952 LUFKIN
4952 SHERMAN
4952 JASPER
4952 JASPER
4352 GARLAND
RECEIVING UATER NAME
TRI8. TO SACATOSA CRK
PEOSE RIVER
PEASE RIVER
COOKS SLOUGH/LEDNA R.
TRANQUITOS CREEK
FLOYD BRANCH
DUCK CREEK
N. BOSOUE RIVER
N. BOSOUE RIVER
HURRICANE CREEK
HURRICANE CREEK
CHQCTAW CREEK
SANDY CREEK
SANDY CREEK
DUCK CREEK
STREW FLOW
(CFS! PIPE ROW
(TENTATIVE! (MS))
MEAN 7B10 MEAN MBX.
0.57 1
107 0 1.45 2.82
107 0 1.45 £.82
2 1.45 0.02* 1
48.68 0.01 1.66 4.33
11.55 0.09 £.34 *.36
11.55 0.09 2.08 *.48
30.52 0 1.4* £.8
30.52 0 1.44 2.8
35.52 0.13 4.91 6.02
35.52 0.13 4.91 6.02
121.5 6.34 7.72 9.98
58.5 0 1.59 4
58.5 0 1.59 4
11.55 0.06 21.62 29.8
(*)
100
100
100
7.48
99.61
97.58
97.28
100
100
98.32
98.32
65.37
100
100
99.82
SAMPLE
pm i CTTTnw
L-ULLE&t t i\Jft
DATE
30Htov-87
14-Sep-fl7
14-Sep-87
£0-Fet>-85
22-Oct-B4
22-May-85
15-Hay-86
08-Dec-87
OB-Dec-87
29-J»l-85
15-Jan-B6
25-Seo-BS
02-Mar-6fl
Oe-Har-88
Q9-Sep-86
-rtnittn wYSicflt/tioiiCAL owiwrrtRtsTHx
SAL-
1 Kit TV
INi i f
io/oo)
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
c£Loo
790
1200
1200
850
2100
800
800
1300
1300
800
1000
2500
500
500
650
HARDNESS
t MR/t DQ
Irw/L Ha
304
304
254
142
224
40
51
39
12*
ALKALINITY
(N6/L ftS
CaCQ3>
216
216
300
321
95
251
209
m
95
ISJ>
8.2
8.1
8.1
7.7
7.9
6.6
6.4
7.9
7.9
7.4
7.7
7.8
6.7
6.7
7.2
TOTft
RESIO.
W.QR-
INS/L)
(0.1
0.8
0.8
0.2
0.5
0.5
3.8
0.2
0.2
0.5
UNION-
US)
IMB/U
1.8
(0.1
(0.1
(0,1
2.*
2.4
(0. !
(0.1
(0.1
MINI-
MUM
CO
(NE/L
W«
A
SAT.)
88*
B.2
95*
8.2
8.6
6.1
8.6
7.9
91*
8.4
7
6.6
92*
92*
8.2
j
i
j
:
I 1 NPDES 1
1121 TX 0022608
! 122 TI 0023001
1133 TX 0023001
112* n 002309*
1125 TX 0023418
1126 TX 0023931
1127 TX 0023931
! 128 TI 002*228
1129 TX 002*228
1130TX 002*309
!131 TX 0024309
( 132 TI 002*325
1133 TX 002*368
!13* TI 0024368
:i35 TX 0024678
! —
OUT-
rnj i
rHUL
i
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
USAF-LAUBHUN AFB
VERNON
VERNQN
UVALDE
KINBSVILLE
NTNUD-RICHARDSON
NTNWHIICHARDSON
STEPHBWILLE
STEPHENVILLE
LUFKIN
LUFKIN
SHERMAN
JASPER
JASPER
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
TEST SPECIES
P. PRKLAS
D. PULEX
P. PRDMELAS
D. PULEX
D. PULE!
D. PULEX
D. PULE!
D. PULEX
P. PROMELAS
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
D. PULEX
P. PRONELAS
D. PlfLEI
D. PULEX
TEST
LENGTH
TM
— crrmcni
LC50
IUA1U1 1 T
MORTALITY
Tit 1SUU
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC EFFLUENT
a
i
a
i
2
1
1
2
7
2
2
1
8
1
2
(12
6 5
34
8 7
3 3
3 2
69
16 16
52 100
100
30 100
0
100
0
100
100
26 100
100
100
0
8 100
95
100
MORTALITY
IN 100*
DECHLOR-
Tun-rrn
INHt tU
EFFLUENT
0
100
0
0
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
100
5
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFFLUENT
LOECNOEC
100 50
50 25
25 12
(12 (12
uwcn i a
NOTES: CI*95* CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LCSO
DiV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFFLUENT
0)V*71*; SEUASE t UNPERMITTED URSTESTREAMS
-
ChV=35*; NOTE NORT. IN DEOC TEST
FACILITY DQESNT ALUAYS DISCHARGE
CI:*-8(a*H); 4-7148H); MOVING AVB ANGLE METHOD
-
-
CI:6-9!24H); 5-8<48H)
NOTE MORT. IN DECHL. EFFL. (PROS. DUE TO NH3)
Ci: NOT RELIABLE! TRIMMED SPEARNAN-KARBER r£THOD
-
-
DiV(12( CI:3-19; NOTE HIGH TOX; TOX. ftFTEH DECHL
CI:54-98
CI: 15-18 (24H)
POTENTIAL
FOR
f WCT
Of" AM
InMncrm
EFFECTS
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
CHRONIC
ACUTE
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
ACUTE
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
BCUTE
CHRONIC
ACUTE
ACUTE
1
CTi
O
I
-------
I
(
»
I
i 1 NPDES 1
!136 TX 0024676
1137 TX 0024678
!138 TX 0024686
; 139 n 0024686
1140 TX 0024686
!141 H 0025429
!142 TX 0025429
!143 n 0025429
!144 TX 0025429
! 145 TX 0025429
!146 TX 0025429
1147 TX 0026263
!148 TX 0026751
! 149 TX 0026751
1150 TX 0027537
OUT-
FflLL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAffi
BflRLflMHJUOt CREEK
GARUWHWCK CHEEK
BmAND-RBiETT CREEK
fiARLAMHtOHLETT CREEK
BRRLAKD-RQULETT CHEEK
USflF-SHEPPARB AFB
USAF-SHEPPARO AFB
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
USfiF-SHEPPARD AFB
USflF-BHEPPARO flFB
USAF-9CPPARD flFB
SPENCER ROAD MUD
EL PBSO-HASKEU.
a PASO-HASKEU.
WAXfiHACHIE
rnpfi TTv/BFfTT
"-1— t HL>ll_i 1 T/ KC.LC1
BIC LOCflTION
CODE (CITY)
4952 EMLAND
4952 BORLAND
49526ARLAND
4952 GflRLflNO
4952 6ARLAKD
9711 WICHITA FBLLS
9711 UlCHITfl FALLS
9711 WICHITA FALLS
9711 WICHITfl FALLS
9711 WICHITA FBLLS
9711 WICHITA FALLS
4952 HOUSTON
4952 a PASO
4952 a PASO
4952 WAXAHACHIE
VING WRTER INFORMATIQN-
RECEIVHB UATER NAME
DUCK CREEK
DUCK CREEK
RDULETT CREEK
ROWLETT CREEK
RD*ETT CREEK
PLUM C. TO WICHITA R.
PLUM C. TO WICHITA R.
PLUM C, TO WICHITA R.
PLUM C. TO WICHITA R.
PLUM C. TO WICHITA R.
PLUM C. TO WICHITA R.
HORSEPEN CREEK TO HSC
RIO SRflNDE
RIO GRANDE
N, WONG CREEK
STREAM ROW
(CFS! PIPE FLOW
(TENTBTIVE) (MS!)
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
11.55 0.06 £1.62 29.8
11.55 0.06 21.62 H.8
20.25 10.07 12.16
20.25 10.07 12.16
20. a 10.07 12.16
274 26.86 1.79 3.28
274 26.86 1.79 3.28
274 26.86 1.79 3.2S
274 26.86 1.79 3.28
274 26.86 1.79 3.28
274 26.86 1.79 3.28
82 0.19 0.53 1.74
1547 42.8 20.7 23.82
1547 42.8 20.7 23.82
13.71 0. t 1.77 4.19
I WC
«)
99.82
99. S£
43.53
43.53
43.53
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.56
6.56
81.22
74.89
74.89
96.48
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
ll-Auj-87
a-Auj-a?
09-Sep-86
ll-flug-87
ll-Auj-87
13-J; 2-3I48H)
CMMSK; NOTE COHPLETE MORT. IN DECHL. EFFL
NOTE COMPUTE WRT. IN DECHL. EFR.
CU6-9; CRITICflL OIL. APPLIES TO ACUTE TEST
ChV=35*
-
ChV=fl»i CELL NOS. SIB. LOt£R IN DECHL. TEST
CI:35-50(24H); 31-43<48H>i NOTE NORT. IN DECHL.
ChV=71*j NOTE MORT. IN DECHL, EFR.
C!:3-&!24M>j3-5<48H)
-
-
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAN
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
VES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO flOUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES flCUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES flCUTE
I
CTl
-------
i
: • NPOE5 1
1151 TX 0033201
I15MK 0634062
:153 TX 0034738
JI54 Tl 0034738
:155 IX 0046884
;i56 TX 0046884
!!57 TX 0046957
;158 TX 00*6%!
.151 n 0046990
1 160 TX 0047058
IIS! TX 0047058
! !62 TX 0047058
:;63 TX 0047074
! 164 Tl 0047074
:i65 TX 0047082
OUT-
FALL
1
001
601
001
00!
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NWC
USfHUNBSVlLUE MAS
ftUCE-fiOUlHSlDE
GULF CHDU HETfUURBICia.
SULF QCN.I KTALLUR6ICAL
HDUSTON-NORTHSIOE
HOUSTON-NORTHSIDE
flUSTlN-SOVBLUE
AUSTIN-WALNUT CREEK
BEAUWNT
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-MEST SIDE
CORPUS OffilSTI-*EST SIDE
CORPUS CHRIST I-flLLISON
rnrtt TTV/EJTTTTUTW^ uflT^B TkrnflWVTTnN —
SIC LOCUTION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING MATER NA*
9711 XINGSVIUE CLEAR CREEK
49B ALICE LfiTTAS CRKK
3341 FREBTOTT DOM "fl" CfiNflL
3341 FREEPORT DOW *R* CANAL
4952 HOUSTON BUFFflLO BBYOU
4952 HOUSTON BUFFALO BflYOU
4952 AUSTIN COLORADO RIVER
4952 AUSTIN UAUUT CR./COLDRBOO R.
4952 BEAUMONT HILDEBRANDT B9YOU
4952 CORPUS CHR1ST1 OSO BAY
4952 CORPUS CHRIST! OSO BUY
4952 CORPUS CHRIST! OSO BflY
4952 CORPUS CHRIST1 Lfi VOLLQ CRK TO OSO CRK
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LA VOLLO CSK TO OSO CRK
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI NIECES RIVER
STREAK aw
(CFS) PIPE aOM
ITENTflTIVE) <«D>
IfPH 7910 MEflN HAX.
715 0.16 0.2
172.3 0.04 0.87 3.37
694.26 539.27 0.682 0.17
694.26 539.87 0.082 0.17
£24 1.68 19.85 47.64
624 1.68 19. 85 47.64
1757 62.53 22.81 39.59
25,25 0.58 31.4 54.2
3823 995.4 19.9 90.9
11.87 Z3.6
11.87 23.6
11. 87 23.6
2.52 6.2
2.52 6.2
1077 23.42 2.04 4.3
TUT
tm,
{*)
65.%
97.12
0.24
0.24
94.82
94.82
36.12
98.8
16
8
8
8
11.9
SWPLE
m i CTiinu
WJLLcwl luN
DflTE
2£-Oct-84
2
-------
, _ . FACILITY/RECEIVING WATER IWTJWBTION — —
'
1
,' • NPSES 1
!166 TX 0047062
1167 TX 0047104
;i68 n 0047104
! 169 TX 0047104
1 170 TX 0047295
1171 TX 0047309
1172 TX 0047309
1173 TX 00*7431
117* TX 0047651
!1 75 TX 00476S1
!!76 TX 0047B30
1177 TX 0047830
i 178 TX 0047848
1179 TX 0052761
ilBO TX 0052825
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NMC
CORPUS CHRISTl-flLLISDN
C. CHRISTl-tfiGUNA MADRE
C. CHR1STI-LA6UNA MADRE
C. CHRJSTI-LASUNA MflDRE
FORT WORTH-VlLLASE CREEK
SALVESTON-MAIN
6ALVESTW-WHN
NTMWIHeSOUITE
TEMPLE
TEMPLE
DALLAS-CENTRHL
DALLAS-CENTRftL
DALLAS-SOUTH5IDE
SHELL DEVELOPMENT CO.
PENNUALT CORP.
61C LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVING WATER NAME
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI NIECES RIVER
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LABUffl MADRE
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LflGUNfl HADRE
4952 CORPUS CHRISTI LfiSUNA MADRE
4952 FORT WORTH H. FORK TRINITY RIVER
4952 6ALVESTON GALVESTON BAY
4952 6ALVESTQN GALVESTDN BAY
4952 MESQU1TE MESOUITE CREEK
4952 TEMPLE LITTLE ELM CREEK
4952 TEMPLE LITTLE ELM CREEX
4952 DALLAS TRINITY RIVER
4952 DALLAS TRINITY RIVER
4952 DALLAS TRINITY RIVER
7391 HOUSTON D. TO N. FORK BRAYS B.
2819 BEHJMONT OLD R. TO NECHES R.
STREAM FLOW
(CFS! PIPE aOH
(TENTATIVE) (MED)
MEAN 7010 MEAN MAX.
1077 23.42 2.04 4.3
1.45 E.66
1.45 2.66
1.45 2.66
1160 3.83 106 207
6.79 15.24
6.79 15.24
12.21 0.09 9.49 16.2
14.29 0.73 2.89 11.6
14.29 0.73 2.89 11.6
2122 213.56 162 254
2122 213.56 162 254
21% 430 33.9 49.7
0 0.36 0.54
8165 1060.5 0.004
1UC
«>
11.9
8
6
8
97.72
B
B
99.39
85.99
85.99
50.8
50.8
10.89
100
0.0006
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
25-flurB7
09-Jun-S7
09-Jun-B7
09-J
IN DECHL. EFFL.
!0-18(48H!
27-4Q(4BH)
POTENTIAL
FOR
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
YES CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
ND CHRONIC
U)
I
-------
. FACILITY/RECEIVING WRIER IW-UKIWTIUW — —
;
*
: QUT-
! FALL
! 1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY NAME
1— — —
IIBI TX 0052825 001 PENNMALT CORP.
!1BS TX 0652625 601 POtWALT CORP.
1163 TX 0052892 001 LEMISVILLE
! 184 H 0053023 001 CHAMPION PAPER CO.
1185 TX 0053023 001 CHAMPION PAPER CO.
!186 TX 0055611 001 BREENVILLE
:i87 TX 0056111 001 USAF-LflCKLAND flFB
! 188 TX 0056731 001 CORSICANft-PLANT 12
1169 TX 0057843 001 6CH8A-SUGARLAND
M90 TX 0059447 001 COU CHEMICAL
; 191 TX 0067695 001 NORTHSTAR STEEL
! 192 TX 0067695 001 NORTHSTAR STEEL
! 193 TX 0067695 001 NDRTHSTAR STEEL
! 194 TX 0068934 001 M08IL CHEMICAL
U95 TX 0068934 001 MOBIL CHEMICAL
i ,
SIC
OK
2819
2819
4952
2621
2621
4952
9711
4952
4953
£869
3312
3312
3312
2821
2821
LOCATION
(CITY)
BEAUMONT
BEAUMONT
LEH1SVILLE
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
BREENVILLE
SAN ANTONIO
CORSICANA
TEXAS CITY
FREEPORT
BEAUMNT
BEAUMONT
BEAUMONT
BEAUMONT
BEAUMONT
RECEIVING HATER NAttE
OLD R. TO NECHES R.
OLD R. TO NECHES R.
ELM FK. TRINITY RIVER
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL
COAEECH CREEK
TRIB. TO KEDIO CREEK
RICHLAND CREEK
8ALVESTON BAY
BRAZOS RIVER (TIDAL)
NEDCS RIVER
NECHES RIVER
NECHES RIVER
UILLOVI MARSH BAYOU
WILLOW MARSH BAYOU
STREAM FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
8165 1060.5
8165 1060.5
580 50.44
855 2.2
855 2.2
65. 16 0. 14
34.1 1.2
92 0.7
697.8 543.25
8165 1060.5
8165 1060.5
8165 1060.5
146 27
146 27
PIPE FLOW
(MED)
MEAN MAX.
0.004
0.004
4.35 8.58
15.7 20.4
15.7 20.4
2.98 5.54
0.27 0.7
2.59 8.4
7.59 13.35
0.92 4.4
0.66 2.6
0.66 2.6
0.66 2.6
0.45 0.79
0.45 0.79
:HC
(%)
0.0006
0.0006
100
30
30
97.06
25.86
85.15
8
0.26
0.095
0.0%
0.096
2.52
46.58
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
DATE
19-fiug-87
19-fiug-B7
17-Sw~86
30-Apr-SS
30-flpr-a5
23-Jul-85
23-Oct-B4
03-Sep-86
29-AW-65
27-May-fl7
19-Atig-87
19-flug-87
19-Aug-87
3(Htov-63
19-feb-85
SAL-
INITY
(0/00)
0
0
0
2
Z
0
2
37
0
o
0
1
fcf-myfc
SPECIFIC
CONDUC-
TANCE
(UMHO/CM)
550
550
825
2500
2500
600
1000
750
2500
45000
250
250
250
1200
ftl FHYiiJUH
HARDNESS
(N6/L AS
CaC03)
32
32
183
160
130
152
254
154
182
46
46
46
72
L_/U«LniU*». I
ALKALINITY
(MS/L AS
CaC03)
1
I
124
50
50
151
241
117
305
45
45
45
58
j+iTtm,
PH
(SU)
7.4
7.4
7.7
6.6
6.6
7.6
7.5
7.5
7.8
8.3
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
TOTflL
RESJD.
CHOR-
INE
(M6/L)
(0.1
(0.1
1.3
2.3
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
a ~
UNION-
IZED
NH3
(MB/L)
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
0.1
0.1
(0.1
(0.1
(0.1
-—1
MINI-
MUM
00
(RS/L
OR *
SAT.)
7.4
B.2
7.2
8.6
7.5
8.6
7.2
61%
8.1
93%
7.2
,'
!
!
! 1 NPCES 1
!1S1 TX 0052885
;i82 TX 0052825
1183 TX 0052892
! 184 TX 0053023
!185 TX 0053023
!186 TI 0055611
1187 TX 0056111
1186 TX 0056731
1189 TX 0057843
! 190 TX 0059447
;191 TX 0057695
1192 H 0067695
U93 TX 0067695
U94 TO 0068934
1195 TI 0068934
OUT-
Cfl) t
rHLL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
PENNHRLT CORP.
PENNHALT CORP.
LEUISVILLE
CHAMPION PAPER CO.
CHAMPION PAPER CO.
GREENVILLE
USAF-UCKLAND AFB
COfiSICONA-PLANT 12
GCMDA-SUGARLANO
DOM CHEMICAL
NORTHSTAR STEEL
NORTHSTAR STEEL
NODTHSTAR STEEL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
TEST SPECIES
D. PULEI
SELENASTRl*
D. PULEI
CERIODAPHNIA
D. PULEI
D. PULEI
D. PULEI
0. PULEX
D. PULEX
C. VAR1E6ATUS
D. PULEX
P. PRQMELAS
SELENASTRUM
D. PULEX
P. PRONELAS
crrLUdrtf lujuui
TEST
LENGTH LC50
DAYS 24H 48H CHRONIC
2 20
4 92
1 3
7
1
233
243
1 4
1
9 61
2
8
4 61
1
1
i
MORTALITY
TU t/VW
IN 10OT
EFFLUENT
100
57
100
100
0
100
100
100
0
100
10
15
56
0
0
MDRTM.1TY
IN 100%
DECHLOR-
EFFLUENT
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
CHRONIC
EFFECT AS
PERCENT
EFaUENT
LDEC NOEC
100 50
25 10
50 25
25 12
•wjrsnfc"" '**
NOTES: CI=f5% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL AROUND LC50
ChV=CHRONIC VALUE IN PERCENT EFaUENT
CI«16-25
ChV=71%i STIMULATION IN 25* AND 50% EFFLUENT
-
ChV*16%; NOEC/LOEC SAME FOR SURVIVAL 1 REPRO.
-
C!:3-4
C!:3-6(24H); 1-6I48N); BINOMIAL METHOD
I«RT. IN KCHL. TESTj ACUTE CHIT. B1L.=100%
-
ChV=35%
-
NO SIB. EFFECT
ChV=17*
W EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY
-
POTENTIAL
FOR
INSTREAM
EFFECTS
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
YES ACUTE
YES CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES ACUTE
YES (CUTE
NO flCUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO CHRONIC
NO CHRONIC
NO ACUTE
NO ACUTE
-------
;-
,
,
',
i
: t KPBES 1
1
!1% TX 0068934
i 197 TX 006893*
!l9i TX 0072982
: 199 TX 0072982
itOd TX 00769%
1201 H 00769%
1202 TX 008**09
1203 TX 0085570
:20* TI 0088170
1205 n 0088170
;206 TX 0088781
1207 TI 0088781
1208 TX 0089125
!209 TI 0089125
1210 TI 0089125
!
OUT-
FALL
1
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
00!
001
001
FACILITY NAME
MOBIL CHEMICAL
MOBIL CHEMICAL
HOLLY FARMS
HOLLY FARMS
CAIN CHEMICAL
CAIN CHEMICAL
DENKA CHEMICAL
FORMOSA PLASTICS
NEU BRAUNFELS
NEU BRAUNFELS
HI-TEK POLYMERS
HI-TEK POLYMERS
EXXON CHEMIDL
EXXON CHEMICAL
EXXON CHEMICAL
r"nr*1l f*\J /OCT^TlKkar Ltf\TtD IkiCnDMOTTnu—
1 HLiLi i If KfcUg IV IHtl NMItH lWUfw»*l ll*n
SIC LOCATION
CODE (CITY) RECEIVINB MATER NAME
2821 BEAUMONT WILLOW HARSH BAYOU
2821 BEAUMONT UILLOU MARSH BAYOU
2016 CENTER PRAIRIE O./TENAHA CH.
2016 CENTER PRAIRIE CR. /TEKAHA CR.
282* CORPUS CHRISTI C.C. INNER HARBOS
282* CORPUS CHRISTI C.C. INNER HBRBDR
2822 HOUSTON SIMS BAYOU TO NSC
2869 POINT COMFORT TRIE. TO OH CREEK
*952 NEU BRAUNFELS BUADflLUPE RIVER
495? NEU BRAUNFELS EUADALUPE RIVER
2833 VERMN PEASE R. TO RED R.
2833 VERNON PEASE R. TO RED R.
2821 WNT BaviEM CEDAR BAYOU
2821 MONT BELV1EU CEDAR BAYOU
2321 MONT BELVIEU CEDAR BAYOU
STREW FLOW
(CFS)
(TENTATIVE)
MEAN 7010
146 27
1*6 27
159.65 6.8
159.65 6.3
837 3*0.**
837 3*0. 44
102.15 0.2
102.15 0.2
0.27
O.Z7
0.27
PIPE aou
(N6D)
ICAN MAX.
0.45 0.79
0.45 0.79
0.62 1.06
0.62 1.06
1.3 2.48
1.3 2.48
1.37 1.98
2.07 5.74
2.07 5.7*
0.32 0.76
0.32 0.76
0.6* 0.38
0.6* 0.3B
0.64 0.38
TUT
1ML
(*>
46.58
46.58
12.36
12.36
8
a
30
15
0.38
0.38
71.26
71.26
78.61
76.61
78.61
i
SAMPLE
ffB 1 PTTTriJ
L-ULLo, 1 1 UN
DATE
30-Jun-87
30-Juit-87
10-feb-87
10-Feb-67
16-frt-BB
16-fet>-88
17-Oct-85
15-Aor-«7
12~Aur87
12-Aug-87
14-Sep-87
14-Sep-B7
02-J
-------
1 NPDES 1
211 TX 0089X7
212 TI 0089567
DUT-
FflU.
1 FACILITY NWC
001 U.R. BRACE
001 U.R. ERflCE
ODE
2899
2M9
(CITY)
HOUSTON
HOUSTON
RECEIVING W
HOUSTON SHIP
HUSTON SHIP
m tut
CHANNEL
owe.
STiCWI FL»
ICFS)
(TENTP.TIVE)
HERN 7010
30
30
PIPE FLOW
INBD! SAMPLE
MEAN WUt. (*) DATE
0.017 £6-flug-8£
0.017 26-ftuj-8£
SAL-
(0/00)
a
2
SPECIFIC
CQNDUC-
(UM}/Cfll
£300
£300
HARDNESS
C*C03)
60
60
PLKPLINm
CattB)
170
170
P"
csu)
7.8
7.8
TQTflL
RESID. IWION-
caos- IZED
(WB/L) (H6/L)
(0. 1 (0. 1
(0.1 (0.1
mm-
WN
DO
(M6/L
SAT.)
8. 4
87%
OUT-
1 NPDES 1 1 FACILITY Nfl*
Ell TX 0069X7 001 M.R. BRflCE
eia TX 0069567 001 y.R. 6«flCE
CHRONIC
MORTflLITV EFFECT ftS
TEST IM 100J PECEKT
UEN6TH U30 (OUTflLITY KW.OS- EFRlBiT
TEST SPECIES DftYS 34H »BH CHRWIC EFRUENT EFFLUENT LOEC NOEC
0. PULO 2 5
P. PTO.1ELPS 7 10
NOTES: CI«9St CONFIDENCE INTEAVflL AROUND LCSO
ChV
-------
-67-
APPENDIX B.
Relative Sensitivity of Effluent Toxicity Tests.
-------
-68-
APPENDIX B.I.
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daohnia pulex. 8 d
and 96 h Algal (Selenastrum capricornutum) Toxicity Tests Conduc
Concurrently for 38 Effluents.
SAMPLE DAPHNIA
NPDES it
AR
AR
AR
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
OK
OK
OK
OK
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
0001449
0034321
0035645
0000191
0000752
0003301
0003301
0003301
0003301
0006131
0006831
0007561
0007854
0007854
0020087
0029769
0032417
0038091
0046477
0056651
0001031
0001261
0022616
0027553
0000353
0000892
0003891
0006025
0006025
0009075
0025429
0026751
0047058
0047104
0047309
0052825
0067695
00891 25
001
001
001
001
001
001
321
511
521
001
001
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
101
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FACILITY NAME
AT&T TELETYPE
HARRISON
GLENWOOD
SEQUOYAH FUEL
UN1ROYAL CHEMICAL CO.
DOW CHEMICAL
DOW CHEMICAL
DOW CHEMICAL
DOW CHEMICAL
TECHNIGRAPHICS
BELLE CHASSE WATER WORKS
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
IMC
IMC
OBERLIN
AGR1CO
ATLAS PROCESSING
NEW ORLEANS
JONESBORO
INTERNATIONAL PAPER
VISTA POLYMER
EAGLE PICHER
GUYMON-SW1FT PLANT
OKLA. C1TY-CHISHOLM CRK
GENERAL DYNAMICS
BELL HELICOPTER
TEMPLE-EASTEX
CELANESE CHEMICAL
CELANESE CHEMICAL
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM
USAF-SHEPPARD AFB
EL PASO-HASKELL
CORPUS CHRIST I -OSO
CORPUS CHRISTI-LM
GALVESTQN-MAIN
PENNWALT CORP.
NORTHSTAR STEEL
EXXON CHEMICAL
DATE
20-May-87
05-Hay-87
21-Jul-87
11-Aug-87
11-AU9-87
15-Jul-87
15-Jut-87
15-Jut-87
15-Jul-87
04-Aug-87
22-Jul-87
19-May-87
19-«ay-87
19-May-87
21-Jul-87
02-Feb-88
17-Nov-87
08-Dec-87
23-Jun-87
02-Nov-87
10-Feb-88
09-Jun-87
27-Oct-87
09-Feb-88
13-Jul-87
13-Jut-87
26-Jan-88
02-Feb-87
21-Sep-87
02-4un-87
03-Aug-87
19-Jan-88
09-Jun-87
09-Jun-87
17-Apr-87
19-Aug-87
19-Aug-87
02-Jun-87
(48H)
NSE
<6
27
NSE
5
NSE
NSE
NSE
<12
NSE
NSE
NSE
16
36
NSE
NSE
*
<6
NSE
--
NSE
<6
--
NSE
NSE
<1
NSE
45
NSE
16
37
<6
17
9
--
20
NSE
NSE
LC/EC50
MINNOW
(80)
NSE
61
46
NSE
<25
NSE
NSE
NSE
--
NSE
NSE
36
8
4
NSE
--
47
27
87
36
NSE
11
64
NSE
NSE
31
--
NSE
NSE
33
-100
--
70
66
NSE
35
NSE
NSE
ALGA
(96H)
NSE
<6
31
36
<6
*
-100
*
-100
-100
24
11
46
<6
<12
94
NSE
<3
11
*
NSE
<3
53
NSE
*
28
NSE
<6
37
20
24
<6
6
14
*
92
61
*
SUSPECTED
TOXICANT(S)
NH3/CL2/OTHER
CL2/OTHER
?
pH/OTHER
?
?
pH
SALINITY/pH/CL2
SALINITY ?
?
ORGAN I CS ?
NH3
NH3
?
NH3
?
CL2/NH3
NH3
NH3
CL2
?
METALS ?
COPPER
NH3
ORGAN I CS ?
METALS ?
NH3/CL2
CL2/OTHER
NH3/CL2
NH3/CL2/OTHER
NH3/CL2/OTKER
CL2
7
?
CL2/OTHER
NSE=NO SIGNIFICANT TOXIC EFFECT
*=SIGNIFICANT TOXIC EFFECT IN 100% OR LOWER EFFLUENT DILUTION
--=NOT TESTED
-------
-69-
APPENDIX B.2.
Relative Sensitivity of 48 h Daphnia pulex and 8 d Fathead
Minnow Toxicity Tests Conducted Concurrently for 96
IC/EC50
NPOES *
AR OO00523
AD 0000680
Ml 0001256
AR 0001236
AR 0001678
AR 0003018
Alt 0020702
AR 0033278
AR 0033375
AR 0033375
AR 0033766
AR 0034380
AR 0034452
I A 0000493
IA 0000841
IA 000354?
I A 000368*
IA 0063735
IA 0003824
IA 0004154
IA 0005258
IA 0005941
IA 0005991
LA 0006041
IA 0007579
LA 0007684
U 0052370
IA 0059153
X 0000531
OK 0000744
OK 0000795
OK ooooa»
OK 0000809
0* 0025701
OK 0026841
OK 0027931
OK 0029131
OK 0030295
OK 0030295
OK 0035246
TX 0000353
IX 0000892
IX 0003522
IX 0004871
TX 0006025
IX 0007056
tx 0007439
IX 0007889
IX 0007889
IX 0009148
IX 0009181
IX 0022608
IX 0023001
TX 0024228
IX 0024368
IX 0024678
IX 0024686
IX 0047074
tx 0047082
IX 0068934
IX 0072982
IX 0076996
IX 0088170
IX 0088781
IX 0089567
002
001
001
002
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
005
001
007
001
001
001
003
001
001
005
005
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
007
101
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
FAClLtTf NAME
STRATEGIC MINERALS
68CAI LAKES CHEMICAL
tit SPECIALTY RESINS
ITL SPECIALTY RESINS
USA-PINE (LUFF ARSENAL
TYSON FOODS
BATESVILLE
FORT SMITH-P STREET
STERLING FAUCEI
STERLING FAUCEI
PARAGQULD
STUTTGART
USA-FO*! CKAFfEE
REICMNOIB CHEMICAL
EXXON CORP.
ySA-LOU. ARMY AMMO. PIT
HIMQWT-KERCULES
UKE CHARLES CARBON
FIRESTONE
COLUMBIA CHEMICAL
GEORGIA PACIFIC
CITGO CITIES SERVICE
KAISER ALUMINUM
TEXACO
LOU. POWER 4 LIGHT
STONE CONTAINER
CAICASIEU REFINING
CECOS INTERNATIONAL
AIDED MATERIALS
WEYERHAUSER
TYSON FOODS
USAF- TINKER AFB
USAF- TINKER AFB
CUSHING-SOUIH SIP
MIDUESt CITY-NOSTHSIOE
MOORE
MUSKOGEE
USA-FORT SILL
USA-FORT SILL
LAWTON
GENERAL DYNAMICS
SELL HELICOPTER
AMOCO OIL CO,
SMEll Oil CO.
CELANESE CHEMICAL
U.S. GYPSUM CO.
SOS BIOTECH
USN-COCPUS CHRIST! NAS
USN-CORPUS CHR1STI NAS
PHILLIPS 66 CO.
SIO RICHAROSON
USAF-LAUGHLIH AFB
VERNON
STEPHENVILU
JASPER
GARLAND-DUCK CREEK
GARIANO-ROUIETI CREEK
CORPUS CM1ST1-UESTSIDE
COSPUS CNR 1 SI 1 -ALLISON
MOB 11 CHEMICAL
HOIIT FAINS
CAIN CHEMICAL
NEW BRAUNFELS
CELANESE
U.R. GRACE
DATE
25-Feb"86
23-Sep-86
29-Oc«-86
i6-M«r-8s
19-Oct-87
22-Feb-BS
29-Mar-88
J1-M»y-88
22-Jul-BS
21-Apr-B6
09-Stp-87
19-Oet-87
31-M>y-88
OS-DK-86
03-DM-S6
29-Fet>-88
04-M.r-86
21-Apr-B*
16-Feto-B8
27-AU9-87
11-AU9-87
«-M«r-86
14-Sep-B7
1l-Feb-86
23-Jun-86
16-JUI-S6
17-Ftb-88
20-Oct-86
10-jm-aa
08-Feb-88
19-NOV-86
30-Jg(-86
17-Aug-87
20-Jir>-88
12-Apr-88
17-AUS-87
20-OCI-87
M-Dec-86
29-Mar-88
29-Mtr-88
10-Sep-86
18-Aug-86
IO-Aug-87
JO- Jut -86
02-Feb-87
21-Jut-86
29-Ju>-87
23-JUI-B6
15-Sep-87
U-Oct-87
H-Oct-87
JO-Noy-87
H-Sep-87
08-Oec-87
02-Mar-88
11-Sep-87
1t-S«p-87
25-AU9-87
25-AUB-87
SO-Juv-87
10-Ftb-87
16-Fct>-88
12-AU9-87
H-Sep-87
26-AU8-86
DAPNN1A
(48H)
U
67
70
27
36
18
USE
83
NSE
NSE
NSE
NSE
NSE
73
47
NSE
71
NSE
•
USE
NSE
81
44
NSE
NSE
NSE
79
NSE
NSE
79
68
32
<6
•
27
9
29
3
<3
21
3
12
36
NSE
45
NSE
93
6
12
NSE
USE
NSE
<12
7
69
NSE
9
<3
NSE
USE
22
40
12
NSE
USE
NiNNOU
<8D>
NSE
73
28
8
46
56
93
76
56
-100
-100
17
59
13
68
23
87
NSE
NSE
NSE
57
25
S2
91
NSE
NSE
•
NSE
500
47
4
37
30
NSE
25
56
36
28
17
NSE
21
72
20
NSE
USE
NSE
73
85
69
54
76
52
30
26
8
NSE
31
U
NSE
*
•
52
57
•
USE
SUSPECTED
TOXICANT(S)
VANA9IUM
ORGAN ICS ?
NN3
NM3
NN3
CL2
CL2
NH3
METALS
NEIALS
NH3
NH3
CL2/OTHERS
ORGAN ICS OR H2S
NH3
1
NH3/SALINITY
?
NH3
NH3
NH3
?
NN3/SALINITY
KH3/CL2
NH3
NH3
CL2/OTNE*
C12/OTKER
7
CL2/OTHERS
CL2
CL2/OTHERS
CL2/OTHERS
CL2
CL2
NH3/CL2
COPPER
NH3
METALS ?
" ?
CL2
CL2
ORGAN ICS ?
ORGAN ICS ?
NH3
CL2/OIHERS
NN3/CL2
CL2/OTHERS
NK3/CL2/OTHERS
CL2
7
CL2
NK3/CL2
CL2/OTHERS
7
MOST
ttNSlTIVE
BAMNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
MINNOW
OAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
MIHNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPNNIA
MINNOW
DAPHK1A
SANE
DAPHNIA
SAME
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
SAME
SAKE
DAPMNIA
SAME
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
OAPNNIA
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
SANE
BAPHNIA
SAME
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
MINNOW
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
OAPHNIA
MINNOW
SAME
OAPHNIA
DAPHNIA
SAMf
MINNOW
DAPHNIA
OAPHK1A
DAPHNIA
MINNOW
SAME
NSE*NO SIGNIFICANT TOXIC EFFECT
•'SIGNIFICANTANT TOXIC EFFECT IN 10CX OR LOWER EFFLUENT DILUTION
-------
-70-
APPENDIX C.
Relative Toxicity of Industrial and Municipal Discharges,
-------
APPENDIX C.I: PLASTICS MATERIALS AND RESINS (SIC CODE 2821)
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Ceriodaphnia
dubia 7d
Chronic
Selenastrum
capricornutum
96h chronic
PUT 4TT\?F
K,&LJ\i X V &
TOXICITY
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
AR LA OK TX NO.
1 1 8 10
11 2
12 3
1135
2 13
1 1
1 1
1 23
1 1
1 1
1 1
TOTALS
PERCENT
67 %
13 %
20 %
50 %
30 %
10 %
10 %
75 %
25 %
50 %
50 %
-------
-72-
APPENDIX C.2: INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS (SIC CODE 2869)
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
•cm ATTX.I? _____
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Selenas trum
capricornutum
96h chronic
Cyprinodon
variegatus
8d chronic
Mysidopsis
bahia or almyra
48h acute
TOXICITY AR
NONTOXIC 3
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH 2
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH 1
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
LA
6
2
4
4
1
4
1
6
1
2
OK TX
3
4
2
2
4
1
1
6
2
1
2
1
NO.
12
6
2
6
6
4
1
4
1
2
6
8
1
1
1
2
3
TOTALS
PERCENT
46 %
23 %
8 %
23 %
55 %
36 %
9 %
57 %
14 %
29 %
38 %
50 %
6 %
6 %
17 %
33 %
50 %
-------
-73-
APPENDIX C.3: PETROLEUM REFINING (SIC CODE 2911)
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Selenastrum
capricornutum
96h chronic
DPT ATTVF
TOXICITY AR
NONTOXIC 2
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC 2
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
LA
6
3
1
2
2
1
OK TX
6 5
2
2
1
1
• 1 1
1
1
1
NO.
19
5
2
1
4
4
3
1
TOTALS
PERCENT
72 %
19 %
7 %
3 %
33 %
33 %
25 %
8 %
50 %
50 %
-------
-74-
APPENDIX C.4: PLATING AND POLISHING (SIC CODE 3471)
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Cyprinodon
variegatus 8d
chronic
RFT ATTVF
TOXICITY AR
NONTOXIC 3
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW 3
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
LA OK TX
2 2
1
2 2
2
2 1
1
1
NO.
7
1
4
5
3
1
1
TOTALS
PERCENT
58 %
8 %
33 %
63 %
38 %
50 %
50 %
-------
-75-
APPENDIX C.5: MUNICIPAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS (SIC CODE 4952)
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
Ceriodaphnia
dubia 7d
chronic
Selenastrum
capricornutum
96h chronic
P I7T ATT\?IT
Ki!«L>/l 1 1 VE*
TOXICITY
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NUMBER 0!
AR LA
6 3
1 2
1
5 5
1
4 1
1 1
2
2
1
1
1 3
- SAMPLES
NM OK
9
1
2
3 6
3
2
2
1
1
TX
1
2
3
26
3
2
3
2
1
1
3
NO,
25
6
6
45
7
9
7
4
3
1
2
2
7
TOTALS*
PERCENT TAD
30 %
7 % 1
7 %
55 % 6
26 %
33 % 3
26 % 5
15 % 1
100 % 1
8 %
17 %
17 %
58 % 3
DNT CND
1 1
6
4
1 1
1
2
1
2
-,VTAD=NUMBER OF EFFLUENT SAMPLES TOXIC AFTER DECHLORINATION
DNT-NUMBER OF DECHLORINATED EFFLUENT SAMPLES NOT TESTED FOR TOXICITY
CND=NUMBER OF SAMPLES WHERE TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE WAS NOT DETECTED
-------
-76-
APPENDIX C.6: FEDERAL FACILITIES (SIC CODE 9711)
NUMBER OF SAMPLES
OCT ATTIJtr . . . . . .
TEST
Daphnia pulex
24-48h acute
Pimephales
promelas 8d
Chronic
TOXICITY AR LA OK
NONTOXIC 2 2
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
NONTOXIC
LOW 1 1
MEDIUM 1
HIGH 2
TX NO.
3 7
1 1
6
3 5
1
2
TOTALS*
PERCENT TAD DNT CND
50 %
7 % 1
43 % 1
63 % 2 1 2
13 % 1
25 % 1
*TAD=NUMBER OF EFFLUENT SAMPLES TOXIC AFTER DECHLORINATION
DNT-NUMBER OF DECHLORINATED EFFLUENT SAMPLES NOT TESTED FOR TOXICITY
CND=NUMBER OF SAMPLES WHERE TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE WAS NOT DETECTED
------- |