Evaluation of Emissions from Paving Asphalts Final Report

-------
                                            EPA-600/B-94-135
                                            August 1994
                       FINAL REPORT

EVALUATION OF EMISSIONS FROM PAVING ASPHALTS
                          Prepared by:

       Christopher C, Lutes, Raymond J, Thomas, and Renee Burnetie
                  Acurex Environmental Corporation
                       4915 Prospectus Drive
                         P.O. Box  13109
                  Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
                   EPA Contract No.6S-D2-0063
                Work Assignment 0/003, i/041, 1/049
                EPA Project Officer:  Bobby E. Daniel

                U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Ait and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
                 Research Triangle Park, NC 277! t
                         Prepared for:

                U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Office of Research and Development
                     Washington, D.C.  20460

-------
                                                -•.
"  *^
-------
                                          ABSTRACT

        This work provides data from pilot-scale measurements of the emissions of specific air
pollutants from paving asphalt both with and without recycled crumb rubber additives.  The methods
used in this work measured emissions from a static  layer of asphalt maintained  for a period of several
hours near the highest temperature likely to be encountered in a real paving operation (176 °C,
350 °F).- Although concentration levels observed for-most species were in most cases near the
detection limits of the analytical methods applied, statistically significant emissions of a  variety of
pollutant species were observed.  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analyses  showed significant
amounts of benzene emitted from both types of asphalt studied. An analysis targeting 16 polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) species of primary interest revealed significant emissions of seven of
the 16 species when the AGIO asphalt without  rubber tests were compared to the faciiity blank tests.
The emissions of five of 16 PAH species were significantly higher in the AGIO thin layer with rubber
tests than in the facility  blank tests. The concentration  observed, though significant, were close to the
limit of detection.  Statistically significant emissions of both total  particulates and PM,0 were  found
from both types of asphalt hot-mix material tested.
-------
                                           PREFACE

       The Control Technology Center (CTC) was established by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA's) Office of Research and Development (ORD) and Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (OAQPS) to provide technical assistance to state and local air pollution control
agencies. Three levels of assistance can.be  accessed through the CTC.  First, a CTC HOTLINE has
been established to provide telephone assistance on mailers relating to air pollution control technology.
Second, more in-depth engineering assistance can be provided when appropriate. Third, the CTC can
provide technical guidance through publication of technical guidance documents, development of
personal computer software, and presentation of workshops on control technotogy matters.

       The technical guidance projects, such as this one, focus on topics of national or regional
interest that are identified through  contact with state and local agencies.
-------
                                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

        The authors gratefully acknowledge ihat this project would not have been successful wiihoul
 the contributions of many individuals. The  Project Officer, Bobby Daniel of EPA's Air and Energy
 Engineering Research Laboratory (AEERL) provided steadfast support and guidance and secured
 asphalt materials,for testing. Gary Foureman of JEPA's Environmental Criteria and Assessment  Office
 (ECAO) provided additional technical guidance and helped secure samples for testing.  C.W, Lee of
 EPA/AEERL arranged for the use of a real-time PAH analyzer for this project. Mack Wilkins of
 EPA's Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory (AREAL) loaned an SO, analyzer
 for project use.

        The assistance of several asphalt companies in providing lest  materials and data on the
 composition of test materials is gratefully acknowledged. Samples were  provided by Scott
 Montgomery of BJythe Industries and Roy Hamlin of Asphalt Rubber Systems, Rick Dingus of the
 C.C. Mangum Corporation generously provided the services of its laboratory as well as a supply of
 aggregate to prepare  a hot-mix from the asphalt provided by Asphalt  Rubber Systems.

        A large number of Acurex Environmental Corporation employees contributed to this project.
 Jeff Ryan provided ongoing technical guidance and review.  Bryant Harrison, Chris Pressiey, and Bill
 Mitchell had important roles in conducting  the pilot-scale tests.  Tony Lombardo,  Jeff Quimo, Lonnie
 Phipps, Buck Gormlcy, and Jeff Johnson were essential in the engineering, design, and  construction of
 the asphalt healing vessel and in customizing the emissions testing facility for use in this project. Lisa
 Florer, Frank Mack, Terry McKee, and Karen Smith of Acurex Environmental helped produce this
 document.  Ron Harris of Acurex Environmental conducted analyses of PAHs  and provided technical
 advice in mass  spectrometry.  Mitchell Howell and Roy  Gorman  conducted the VOC analyses.  Mark
 Bero played a key role in the identification  of tentatively identified organic species.  Rob Martz
 provided additional technical review  services.

       Semivolatile organic analytical services were provided by Air Toxics Ltd,  under the direction
of Linda Freeman, Bob Freeman, and Alexis Meredith.  Lead analyses were provided by IEA  Inc.
under the direction of Linda Mitchell and Sue Stutts. Elemental  analyses were provided by Gailbrailh
Laboratories under the direction of Gail  R.  Hutchens.
                                              IV
-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
 Section                                "                                  PjJS£

 ABSTRACT	ii
 PREFACE	 Hi
 -ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	. ,	,	. ,	  iv
 LIST OF TABLES		vii
 LIST OF FIGURES	 .  x

 1.0   INTRODUCTION  .............		,	  I

 2.0   OBJECTIVES		...,,...,,..	  5

 3.0   APPROACH	, .  5
      3,1   SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH		  5
      3,2  ASPHALT MATERIALS		  6
      3.3  ANALYSIS OF ASPHALT MATERIAL BEFORE TESTING	  7
      3.4  ASPHALT HEATING VESSEL'		  9
      3.5  TEST METHODOLOGY  .	   II
      3.6  TEST FACILITY	,	   13
      3.7  SAMPLE SHED	   13
      3.8   HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS MOBILE LABORATORY (HAPML)  	   16
      3.9  SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODS	   17
          3.9.1    Particulate/SemivolatHe Organic Sampling	   17
          3.9.2    Paniculate and Semivolatile Organic Analysis	   19
          3.9.3    Paniculate Metals Sampling and Analysis	  20
          3.9.4    Volatile  Organic Compounds Sampling and Analysis	  21
          3.9.5    Hydrogen Sulfide Analysis	  21
          3.9.6    Continuous Emission Monitors  .	 22

4,0   DATA, RESULTS, AND DISCUSSION	  23
     4.!    MATERIALS COMPOSITION	  24
     4.2   ASPHALT HEATING TEMPERATURES  .		  24
     4.3   TARGETED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS	.	  24
     4.4   TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS	  26

                                 (continued)
-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS (concluded)
' Section                                  "                           Page

     4.5   TARGETED SEM1VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS COLLECTED ON
          XAD-2	.. ~.."..........'."..' 26
     4.6   TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
          COLLECTED ON XAD-2 ....		 .	,	  28
     4,7   ORGANIC PARTICULATE-BOUND TARGETED
          COMPOUNDS—CONTRACTED LABORATORY FULL SCAN MASS
          SPECTROMETRY ANALYSES	  29
     4.8   TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED PARTICULATE-BOUND ORGANIC
          COMPOUNDS—CONTRACTED LABORATORY FULL SCAN MASS
          SPECTROMETRY ANALYSES  ....	......,,,....,,	  31
     4.9   ORGANIC PARTICULATE-BOUND TARGETED COMPOUNDS—ACUREX
          ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTED ION MONITORING MS ANALYSES ........  31
     4.10  CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR RESULTS	  35
     4,11   LEAD	  35
     4.12  HYDROGEN SULFIDE	  36
     4.13  TOTAL PARTICULATES AND PM,0	 .  36

 5.0  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS	  71

 6.0  REFERENCES  ...			...  76

 APPENDIX A—QUALITY CONTROL EVALUATION REPORT .	A-1
 APPENDIX B—SUPPORTING TABLES AND FIGURES		B-!
 APPENDIX C—ADDITIONAL QUALITY CONTROL DATA	 C-1
 APPENDIX D—TOTAL ION CHROMATOGRAMS		D-1
 APPENDIX E—STANDARDS ADDITION ANALYSIS		E-1
                                  VI
-------
                             LIST OF TABLES
 Table                             _               '                   Page

 I.   COMPOSITION OF ASPHALT MATERIALS	7
 2.   TEST MATRIX WITH AVERAGE, MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM TEMPERATURES , .   38
 3,   VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO THIN AND THICK
     ESTIMATED EMISSIONS .	,	   39
 4,   VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO WITH RUBBER
     ESTIMATED EMISSIONS .......				   42
 5.   VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—FACILITY BLANKS ESTIMATED
     EMISSIONS	,	.,  45
 6.   VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND T-TEST STATISTICS   	....,,,,,...   48
 7.   ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN, SEMIVOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUND ESTIMATED
     EMISSIONS 	,	.,...;   49
 8.   ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN, TARGETED COMPOUND T-TEST STATISTICS  ........   53
 9.   VAPOR PHASE, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS -
     ESTIMATED EMISSIONS	   54
 10.   ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN, SEMIVOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUNDS
     ESTIMATED EMISSIONS	,		   57
 11.   ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN T-TEST STATISTICS*		   60
 12.   PARTICULATE-BOUND, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED,  SEMIVOLATILE
     COMPOUNDS—ESTIMATED EMISSIONS	   61
 13.   ORGANIC PARTICULATE TRAIN, SEMIVOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUND
     ESTIMATED EMISSIONS—ACUREX ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES		   63
 14.   ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN T-TEST STATISTICS—ACUREX ENVIRONMENTAL
     ANALYSES*	   64
 15.   ESTIMATED EMISSIONS FROM SIMULATED ASPHALT PAVING	   65
 16.   LEAD ANALYSIS OF PM10 PARTICULATE LEAD SAMPLES	   66
 17.   MISCELLANEOUS T-TEST STATISTICS*	   67
 IS.   HYDROGEN SULFIDE MEASUREMENTS BY DRAGER TUBE	,	   67
 19.   TOTAL AND PMIO PARTICULATE MEASUREMENTS	   68
20.   LIST OF COMPOUNDS WITH STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS  	72
21.   SUMMARY OF LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE AND ESTIMATED EMISSION
     VALUES		73

                               (continued)
-------
                         LIST OF TABLES (continued)
Table            '                               _                    Page

A-l.  DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES FOR CRITICAL MEASUREMENTS ....		A-6
A-2.  ASPHALT PROJECT VOLATILES QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS		A-7
A-3.  VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND SURROGATE RECOVERIES	,	A-8
A-4.  COMPARISON OF SPIKED VALUES. FULL SCAN DATA AND SELECTED ION
     MONITORING DATA FOR PARTICULATE-BOUND SEMIVOLATILES .		A-9
A-5.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN SEMIVOLATILE SURROGATE RECOVERIES	 A-M
A-6.  ORGANIC PARTICULATE TRAIN SEMIVOLATILE SURROGATE RECOVERIES  . . A-11
A-7.  COMPARISON OF FULL SCAN AND SELECTED ION MONITORING ANALYSES
     OF PARTICULATE PHASE SAMPLES	A-12
A-8.  CONTINUOUS EMISSION  MONITOR CALIBRATIONS	A-14

B-1.  TARGETED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AC 10 THIN AND
     THICK AIR CONCENTRATIONS	 . . . B-2
B-2.  TARGETED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO WITH RUBBER
     AIR CONCENTRATIONS		B-5
B-3.  TARGETED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—FACILITY BLANKS
     AIR CONCENTRATIONS 	B-S
B-4.  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS—AGIO THIN AIR
     CONCENTRATIONS .		 B-i!
B-5.  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS—AC 10 THIN WITH RUBBER
     AIR CONCENTRATIONS ,	 B-13
B-6.  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS—FACILITY BLANK AIR
     CONCENTRATIONS	 B-15
B-7   TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS—AGIO THIN ESTIMATED
     EMISSIONS	,	 B-17
B-S,  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS—AC 10 THIN WITH RUBBER
     ESTIMATED EMISSIONS	 B-I9
B-9.  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS—FACILITY BLANK
     ESTIMATED EMISSIONS	 B-2!
B-IO  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN TARGETED SEMIVOLATILE MASSES	 B-23
B-] I.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN TARGETED SEMIVOLATILE AIR CONCENTRATIONS  . B-26

                               (continued)
                                  vin
-------
                         LIST OF TABLES (concluded)
Table                                                         _       Page

B-12. VAPOR PHASE, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS -
     AMOUNTS/SAMPLE	, ,	 B-29
B-13. VAPOR PHASE, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS -
     AIR CONCENTRATIONS .	 B-32
B-14. ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN TARGETED SEMIVOLATILE MASSES	 B-35
B-15. ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN TARGETED SEMIVOLATILE AIR
     CONCENTRATIONS	,	 B-38
B-16. PARTICULATE-BOUND, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE
     COMPOUNDS - MASSES		 B-4!
B-17. PARTICULATE-BOUND, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE
     COMPOUNDS - AIR CONCENTRATIONS			 B-43
B-18. TARGETED ORGANIC PARTICULATE TRAIN SEMIVOLATILE MASSES--
     ACUREX ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES	 B-45
B-19. ORGANIC PARTICULATE TRAIN SEMIVOLATILE AIR CONCENTRATIONS-
     ACUREX ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES			 B-46
B-20. SEMIVOLATILE BLANK MASSES		.	...... B-48

C-l.  SVOC RECOVERIES FROM FILTERS	 ,	 C-2
C-2.  SVOC RECOVERIES FROM XAD-2 MODULES  	C-7
C-3.  SVOC FILTER RPDS (%)		 ,	 . C-12
C-4.  XAD-2 MODULE RPDS (%)	C-14
C-5.  LEAD RECOVERIES AND PERCENT BIAS	C-16
C-6.  LEAD PRECISION AND PERCENT RPD	 C-!6

E-L  STANDARDS ADDITIONS RESULTS	'.	. . E-3
                                   IX
-------
                             LIST OF FIGURES
 Figure                                                              Page

 1.   VIEWS OF THE HEATING VESSEL. ._.,..........,...-	  10
 2.   AERIAL VIEW OF THE PRODUCTS QMNCQMPLETE COMBUSTION FACILITY. , ,   14
, 3.   DIAGRAM OF THE BURN HUT AS CONFIGURED FOR THE ASPHALT HEATING
     TESTS. . . . .	,	   15
 4,   PMIO MEDIUM VOLUME SAMPLER; PARTICULATE METALS TRAIN SHOWN.  ...   18

 B-l.  1/28/93 - ACIO ASPHALT TEST, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS.
     SURFACE TEMPERATURE				B-51
 B-2.  2/4/93 - ACIO TEST, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS. SURFACE
     TEMPERATURE		....	. B-52
 B-3.  2/1S/93 - HUT BLANK, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS.
     SURFACE TEMPERATURE		,	B-53
 B-4.  2/IS/93 - ACIO THIN TEST, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS.
     SURFACE TEMPERATURE 			. . B-54
 B-5.  2/25/93 - ACIO THIN TEST, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS.
     SURFACE TEMPERATURE	,		B-55
 B-6.  4/7/93 - CRUMB RUBBER TEST, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION
     VS. SURFACE TEMPERATURE		 B-50
 B-7.  4/14/93 - HUT BLANK, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS.
     SURFACE TEMPERATURE ....	, . . . .		 B-57
 B-3.  4/27/93 - AGIO/RUBBER THIN TEST, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION
     VS. SURFACE TEMPERATURE	 B-5S
 B-9.  5/7/93 - HUT BLANK, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS. SURFACE
     TEMPERATURE	B-59
 B-10. 5/24/93 - ACIO/RUBBER THIN TEST, TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION
     VS. SURFACE TEMPERATURE	,	B-6G
 B-i 1. 1/28/93 - ACIO ASPHALT TEST, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	 . B-61
B-12. 2/4/93 - AGIO TEST, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	 B-62
B-13. 2/11/93 - HUT BLANK TEST. TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME .....!..	B-63
                               (continued)
-------
                        LIST OF FIGURES (concluded)
Figure                                                               Pngc

B-14. 2/18/93 - AGIO THIN TEST, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	,	 B-64
B-15, 2/25/93 - AGIO THIN TEST, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	, .		, B-65
B-I6. 4/7/93 - CRUMB RUBBER TEST, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	 B-66
B-17. 4/14/93 - HUT BLANK, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	 B-67
B-18. 4/27/93 - AGIO/RUBBER THIN TEST, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL
     HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	 B-68
B-19. 5/7/93 - HUT BLANK, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON
     CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	 B-69
B-20. 5/24/93 - AGIO/RUBBER THIN TEST, TEMPERATURE AND TOTAL
     HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION VS. TIME	 B-70

E-l. COMPARISON OF SIM STANDARDS ADDITION (AND SIM ISOTOPE DILUTION
    SAMPLE TF5)	 E-4
-------
                                           SECTION I



                                        INTRODUCTION








        Paving asphalt is a widely used product with incompletely characterized emissions to the



 atmosphere. Approximately 20 million metric tons of asphalt were sold in I976,1 Asphalt is



 primarily composed of "very high molecular weight hydrocarbons."1  The vast majority of asphalt used



 in road pavmg applications is derived from petroleum refining, although asphalt can also be obtained



 from natural deposits.1  Asphalt is most often used in paving applications as a "hot-mix" of petroleum-


                                                            *?
 derived asphalt and aggregate material (crushed stone or gravel).*"



        Typical elemental analyses of asphalt show the following approximate weight percentages:



 carbon, 80-90 percent; hydrogen,  5-11  percent; sulfur, 0,4-7.3 percent; nitrogen, 0.4-0.9 percent; and



 Oxygen, 0.0-2.0 percent.'  Among the compounds identified in a soxhlet extract of an asphalt sample



 were dibenzothiophene, methyldibenzothiophene, phenanthrene,  pyrene, and fluoranthene.3



        A previous study attempted to measure pollutant levels in  the emissions, known as "blue



 smoke," from an asphalt hot-mix facility using a temporary enclosure to aid sampling."



 Concentrations measured (in ppm, vol) were carbon monoxide (3-6 ppmv), C>*Cg hydrocarbons (< I



 ppmv), hydrogen sulfide (< 0.2-1.5 ppmv), methane (2-3 ppmv), nitrogen dioxide (0.05-0,08 ppmv),



 and sulfur dioxide  (< 2 ppmv).  Concentrations were also reported for the following organic species



(pg/1,000 rn3):  pyrene (44-240), benzo(a)anthracene (5-38), benzo(a)pyrene (3-22), benzo(e)pyrene



(non-detectable - 40), perylene (5-16).  The paniculate matter (PM) was determined to be composed of



aromatics (26 percent), cycloparaffins (40 percent), paraffins (28 percent), and  sulfur aromatics




                                                I
-------
(6 percent).'  Asphalt emissions were also discussed in a recent EPA report to Congress.4  An




evaluation of available literature shows a lack of emissions data for specific pollutants measured in




such a way that emissions from asphalt paving could be estimated. Thus, the steering committee of




the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Control Technology Center (CTC) sponsored a




research project examining emissions from paving asphalt.  This study was performed under contract




to the EPA's Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory (AEERL) by Acurex Environmental




Corporation, The work was conducted  through the guidance of an EPA-approved Quality Assurance




(QA) Test Plan (AEERL QA Category  III);
-------
                                           SECTION 2




                                          OBJECTIVES









        The objective of this work was to provide quantitative data on the emissions of specific




 pollutants from paving asphalt.  In addition, because paving asphalts with recycled crumb rubber




 additives are now beginning to be used, as required by the Imermodal  Surface Transportation




 Efficiency Act.5  This project also compared the emissions of asphalt with and without this additive.




 Crumb rubber is  defined as "scrap tire rubber that has been processed to particle sizes usually less than




 9.5 mm."  The acquired data are intended lo provide insight into the possible health effects of human




 exposure to asphalt emissions as we!) as to assess the contribution of asphalt emissions to ozone




 non-attainment.  This report will also provide baseline data to which the emissions from other




 modified asphalt  products can be compared.




        This work was performed at EPA's Environmental Research Center (ERC) in Research




 Triangle Park, NC, by Acurex Environmental.  Samples of paving asphalts provided were heated in a




 specially designed vessel,  described in Section 3, within the Open Burning Simulation Test Facility.




 Testing included two types of asphalt—an AC10 grade asphalt hot-mix, and an AGIO grade asphalt




 hot-mix with a crumb rubber additive. The engineering properties of the asphalt grades are wed




defined in the literature.1  Sampling was performed for a wide  range of volatile and semivolatife




organics, total PM, NO, SO,, CO, 02, CO2, and parttculate-phase lead.  A list of specific PAH species




were specifically targeted due to their demonstrated carcinogenicily in animals.
-------
        The concentration data for all analytes were convened LO emission rates expressed on a per




time and per surface area basis. These  rates were calculated from the volumes sampled by each train,




the volumes of air flowing imo the test  facility, the measured mass or concentration of analyte, the




surface area of the asphalt heating vessel, and the duration of the sampling period as follows:




        Emission rate = (m x  f x t x u)/(v x s x t)




        where:




            m = mass of analyte




          - f  =  flow rate into facility




            t = time period of sampling




            u  = unit conversion factor, as appropriate




            v  = volume of air sampled




            s  = surface area of vessel




Alternately,




        Emission rate = (c x f x t x  u)/(s x t)




        where;




           c  = measured concentration  of analyte




           f = flow rate into facility




           t = time period of sampling




           u = unit conversion factor, as appropriate




           s = surface area of vessel
-------
                                           SECTION 3




                                           APPROACH









 3.1  SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH




        The project consisted of a replicate study to collect and qualitatively and quantitatively




 characterize organic and inorganic emissions From a pilot-scale simulation of the asphalt paving




 processes. Although it was recognized that  asphalt experiences a variety of temperature conditions




 during a paving process, the EPA and Acurex Environmental investigators believed that il was




 impractical to simulate  this  temperature profile in an experimental situation. Simulation of the




 physical agitation undergone by an asphalt hot-mix material during the course of its application  by




 automated road construction equipment was  also judged to be well beyond  the resources available for




 this  pilot-scale project.  Therefore, it was decided that a measurement of emissions from a static layer




 of asphalt, maintained for a period of several hours near the highest temperature likely  to be




 encountered in a  real paving operation, would provide a realistic basis for the estimation of emissions




 from an asphalt process.  A thin layer of asphalt was heated in a stainless steel vessel  within a test




 facility specifically designed to simulate emissions from area sources. Sampling was conducted within




 the facility through medium volume PM)0 heads for semivolatile organics and particulate-phase lead.




 Air samples  of volatile organic  compounds (VOCs) were removed directly from the facility and




collected in Tedlar bags. A portion of the air within the facility was diverted to an adjacent sampling




facility via an  induced draft  duct.  A  portion of the sample from the induced draft duct  was also




monitored for C02, CO, NO, 0-,, SOT, particulate-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),





                                                5
-------
 and total hydrocarbons (THCs) by a series of continuous emission monitors (CEMs), The organic




 constituents were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively using a gas chromatograph/mass




 spectrometer (GC/MS).  The lead was quantified using a graphite furnace atomic absorption method




 (GFAA).  Hydrogen sulfide was measured using colorimetric Dra'ger tube method.  Measured




 concentrations for all analytes were related to dilution air volumes and the surface area of asphalt to




 derive emission rates.  The EPA's Open Burning Simulation Facility used in this study is described




 more fully below,




 3.2  ASPHALT MATERIALS                                 ~    -




        Asphalt cement and the Hot-mix asphalt were supplied by commercial vendors.  Blythe




 Industries of Haw River, NC, supplied the AGIO Hoi-mix material used in the tests of non-rubber




 containing asphalt.  Data obtained from Blythe Industries indicated that this Hot-mix contained 5.6




 percent total asphalt by weight, of which,  4.3 percent was new asphalt cement and 1.3 percent was the




 asphalt cement fraction of the recycled asphalt product (RAP) included in the aggregate.  Data




 obtained from the manufacturer indicated that this asphalt also contained 0.50 percent of a "non-strip




 additive," supplied by Westavaco of Mulberry FL, known as Indulin AS-1.  The asphalt test  material




 was obtained from a standard production run of a full-scale Hot-mix plant by Acurex Environmental




 personnel acting under EPA direction.




        The asphalt Hot-mix  used in the rubber containing materials  tests was prepared in several




 steps.  Asphalt Rubber Systems Corporation, of Riverside, RI, supplied samples of an AGIO  asphalt




 cement  containing crumb rubber in tightly  sealed metal containers similar in appearance to paint cans.




The  manufacturer reported that this  material  consisted of 79 percent AGIO asphalt, 3 percent extender




oil, and a total of 18 percent  rubber (of which 15 percent was derived from auto tires and 3 percent




was  described as "high-nitre tennis ball scrap").   Personnel of the C.C. Mangum Corporation of




Raleigh, NC, familiar with the formulation of asphalt, prepared bench-scale mixtures of the rubber




containing Asphalt Cement, supplied by Asphalt Rubber Systems, with aggregate chosen from C.C.
-------
 Mangum's supply so as to duplicate as closely as possible that used at Blythe Industries.  This bench-




 scale Hot-mix was prepared with a  total asphalt cement content of 5.3 percent including 4,6 percent




 new asphali cement and 0,7 percent from the asphalt fraction of the RAP used in the aggregate.  The




 preparation of this bench-scale Hot-mix was witnessed by EPA and Acurex Environmental personnel,




 A portion of Table I summarizes the composition of the aggregates used in these Hot-mixes,




       To minimize oFf-gassing, all asphalt Hot-mixes were held in lightly sealed stainless steel




 vessels at room temperature, from the time  they were obtained  from a production run or were mixed




 on a bench-scale until the time of testing.  Samples of the asphalt materials were submitted to a




 commercial  laboratory for "ultimate" analyses.




 3,3  ANALYSIS OF ASPHALT MATERIAL BEFORE TESTING




       An ultimate analysis of the  asphalts was performed before testing by a subcontracted




 laboratory using methodologies best summarized by ASTM methods 3576 and 3172.7 The primary




 purpose of this analysts was to-determine the elemental composition of ihe asphalt cements used




(carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur) so that the similarity of the two asphalts could be




assessed.   The data from this analysis, as presented in a portion of Table I, indicate that the




compositions of the two AGIO asphalts were quite similar, as might be expected.




                    TABLE  1.  COMPOSITION OF ASPHALT MATERIALS
Ultimate Analysis of Asphalts wilhou! Aggregate (all data in % as received)
Blythe Industries ; Asphalt Rubber -, Asphati Rubber
AC-IO Systems AC- 10 , Systems AC- 10
1 ; With Rubber ' No Rubber Included
Water (Kari Fisher)
Carbon '•
Hydrogen ;
Nitrogen fKjeldahl)
Total Halogen (as C!) '
Sulfur
Ash
Oxygen (by difference)
0,009!
84.43
10,33
0.52
<0,004
3.77
0.24
0.95
0.16
S2.94
9,74
0.11
i 0.010
• 4.00
1.78
1,50
' o.oto
S3.76
1027
0.42
0.0044
4.74
<0,09
0.81
                                          (continued)
-------
              TABLE 1.  COMPOSITION OF ASPHALT MATERIALS (concluded)
Composition of Blythc Industries Aggregate:
Aggregate Type
Aggregate Source
Percentage of Total Aggregate Mix
Specific Gravity
% Passing Sieve 3/4 in (1.9 cm)
% Passing Sieve 1/2 in {1.3 cm)
% Passing-SicvB 3/g-iri (0,95 cm)
% Passing Sieve #4
% Passing Sieve #8
% Passing Sieve #40
% Passing Sieve #80
% Passing Sieve #200 1
Composition of C,C, Man gum Aggregate:
Aggregate Type i
Aggregate Source i
Percentage of Total Aggregate Mix
Specific Gravity
% Passing Sieve 3/4 in (1.9 cm)
% Passing Sieve 1/2 in (1.3 cm)
% Passing Sieve 3/8 in (0.95 cm) j
% Passing Sieve #4
% Passing Sieve #8
% Passing Sieve #16
% Passing Sieve #40
% Passing Sieve #80
% Passing Sieve #200

Recycled Asphalt
Product (RAP)
Biyihe Stockpile
24.1
2.83
100 -
98
-—94
72
55
31
15
7,6

RAP
C.C. Mangum
24.1
2.701
100
96
92
76
60
48
32
29
12.1

#78M
Martin
Marietta
', 33
2.65
100
100
; 99
: 33
• 5.8
' 2.6
i 1.2
i 0.4

j #78M
i
1 Martin
: Marietta
31
' 2.723
t
100
; 95
33
4
T
2
2
i
! 1.5

SCRCS.
Martin
Marietta
31
2.88
100
100
; loo"
1 97.2
71
25.6
i 15.3
\ 8.3

j SCRGS.
, Martin
Marietta
33
2.741
i
1
t
100
99
81
53
31
18
: 8.5

Sand
Blythc-
Kclly Pil
11.9
2.66
UK)
100
" 100
100
100
41
8.3
2

Sand
C.C.
Man cum
11.9
A
f
t
100
95
89
50 '
32
4
1.5
* Data
t Data
were not provided.
were not provided since 100% of the material passed a finer sieve.
-------
 3.4 ASPHALT HEATING VESSEL




        An open-topped, square, asphalt heating vessel was custom designed and built by Acurex




 Environmental.  All portions of the vessel that contacted the asphalt material were constructed of




 welded stainless steel sheet.  Between the inner shell of the stainless steel sheet and the outer steel




 case, a series of electrical resistance heaters (14 heaters of 240 V each, 500 W, offset terminal type,




 3.8 cm wide and 60.3 cm long, part no. SGA1J23NO6, Atlantic  Electric Systems Inc., Charlotte, NC)




 were mounted and insulated with kaolinite wod so as to heat the inner shell as uniformly as possible.




 The dimensions of the vessel are indicated  in Figure 1.  The vessel was equipped with a removable




 grid, constructed from a stainless steel flat bar 0,47 cm thick and 5 cm wide.  The grid was included




 in  the  vessel after preliminary experiments indicated the need to  improve heat distribution throughout




 the material in the vessel.  The vessel was equipped with a temperature controller (proportioning type,




 range of 0-200 °C (32-392 °F), pan no, 49-J-0-200C, Omega Engineering, Stamford, CT) designed to




 maintain adequate temperature control between  157 and 162 °C (314-323 °F) with an absolute




 maximum temperature of  177 °C (350 °F).  The temperature controller was  attached to a Type-J, rod




 shaped "utility" thermocouple (Omega Engineering, Stamford, CT) that was  located near the center of




 the asphalt mixture  during each experiment (see Figure 1). Actual temperatures achieved in various




 experiments are discussed in Section 4 of this document. Temperature uniformity was monitored by




 measurements taken periodically during the emissions testing in three different locations within the




asphalt layer (see Figure  1) using Type-K, rod shaped "utility" thermocouple probes (Omega




Engineering, Stamford, CT). The thermocouples in the asphalt layer shown  in Figure I were initially




located at the following heights above the bottom of the inner surface of the asphalt healing  vessel:




Tl  and control thermocouple, 1.6 cm; T4, 0.5 cm; and T8, 2,5 cm.  Before the first thin layer asphalt




test vvas conducted on February 4, 1993, the thermocouple heights were readjusted  to the  following




values;  Tl  and control thermocouple, 1.1 cm; T4, 0.3 cm; and T8,  1.4 cm.  Before the February 18,




1993 experiment,  thermocouple T8 was replaced with a Type-K thermocouple weld pad probe thai was
-------
              TOP VIEW
ou.s

45.6





30.4


15.2




0
.
,7,6
19 05 j

t
Control

i T








1905 Thermocouple,
1905 ' "T
« T*l


t.
fS|


)


3, 	 '__.„_ ._ Hcac dixpcfhion grid


- ' :
'
,


i

i
2J.6
t
,
i
{
•

0 15.2










r^
i



! i
- ; : •"•
i i
f
i
ITS ! !
J !
( i
t i
1 I
: t



\

%
__
-i.
<
a
3
/






30.4 45.6 60.8
(all dimensions in cm)
             SIDE VIEW
                                Depression Depth
                                  of 15.2cm
          (all dimensions in cm)
Figure I.  Views of the heating vessel.
                 10
-------
 placed directly in contact with the surface of the asphalt material for each experiment (Omega




 Engineering, Stamford, CT).




 3.5 TEST METHODOLOGY




          For a period.of 16 to 24 h before the initiation of each test, the sealed container of asphalt




 Hot-mix to be used in that test was preheated to just below the design temperature range in an




 electrical resistance oven.  This procedure was necessary because the asphalt Hot-mix has a  high heat




 capacity and therefore could not be brought to its design temperature quickly. This situation is




 reflective of the field situation where asphalt is held for long periods of time at elevated temperatures




 (>I21 °C, >250 °F).8  Before the start of each lest., the heating control thermocouple of the asphalt




 heating vessel was located on its heated surface thus allowing the surface of the vessel to be preheated




 to the design temperature.




        Before and after each test, or before and after each change of sample media (if this occurred




 more frequently), all sampling trains were leak-checked.  Before the beginning of each test day, at




 least 10 min of background data were acquired from the CEMs and thermocouples.  The asphalt




 Hot-mix in the experiment conducted on January  28, 1993 was poured  and lightly compacted with




 hand implements to an approximate depth of 3,8 cm (a depth that is within the range used in actual




 paving operations),  (This experiment is referred to  in da
-------
 initiated as soon as the asphalt Hot-mix material had achieved a temperature near the design range




 previously discussed. The temperature was reached between 10 and 70 tnin after the asphalt pouring




 was completed.




        For facility blank experiments (also referred to as hut blank experiments), the procedures




 discussed above were modified. Although the asphalt Hoi-mix  material was preheated as in an actual




 experiment, no attempt was made to heat the heating vessel.  The preheating of the hot-mix material




 was conducted to evaluate whether the preheating process biased the actual test results. The asphalt




 heating vessel was not preheated because ail traces of asphalt Hot-mix  from previous experiments




 could not be removed despite the rigorous vessel cleaning procedures described in the following




 paragraph.  Warmed air was supplied to the facility as in all experiments.  No asphalt Hot-mix was




 placed in the heating vessel for these experiments.  However, personnel did enter and occupy the




 facility  for a period similar to the time  required in the facility for pouring and compacting the asphalt




 in an actual experiment.  The onset of sampling was then delayed for a period similar to the delay




 required in actual experiments to approach design asphalt Hot-mix temperatures.




        Belween each experiment, the facility was cleaned thoroughly.  The asphalt Hot-mix material




 was warmed and removed with hand lools. The heating vessel was  then rinsed with several aliquots




 cyclohexane to remove residual material. The floor of the facility was then swept with hand tools to




 remove spilled asphalt Hot-mix material. All personnel entering the facility wore Tyvek boot covers




at all times to avoid contaminating the facility.
                                               12
-------
 3.6 TEST FACILITY




         The test facility (Figures 2 and 3) is an outbuilding with a 2.7 by 3.4 m (S.9  by I I.I ft) floor




 area and a sloping roof with a minimum height of 1.9 m (6.3 ft) and a maximum height of 2.2 m




 (7.3 ft), which had been previously modified for small-scale, open-combustion simulation experiments.




 This facility was further modified to adapt it for the low emission levels expected from asphalt.




         The building was  fitted with a warmed air handling system.(based  on a 20S V electric  utility




 heater, part no. 3E081, W.W. Grainger) (hat delivered approximately 4.21 m3/min (148 ft'Vmin) of




 warmed ambient air to the facility.  This flow rate was sufficient to  maintain a positive pressure within




 the facility as indicated by a static pressure gauge in all wind and pressure conditions experienced




 during testing.  Therefore, it could be assumed thai  the outflow rate  from the facility was equal to  the




 inflow rate. At this flow rate, the effective air exchange rate of the test facility is 0.22 air




 exchanges/mtn,




        A pyramidical aluminum deflector shield was located over the asphalt heating vessel to




 enhance air mixing. The sample transport duct, 17-cm (6.6-in) OD pipe, was located  directly over the




 rear portion of the deflector shield.  This duct  transported a representative portion of the test facility




 environment to the sampling shed located adjacent to  the test facility (Figure 2). To minimize heat




 loss and condensation  of organics, the duct was insulated outside the test facility.  The inner walls  and




 ceiling of the test facility were covered with 1.6 mm (1/16  in) of aluminum sheeting.  To provide a




 highly clean, inert surface  within the test facility for this project, all surfaces within the facility  were




 completely  wrapped with Tedlar sheet material (approximately 0,06 mm thick) sealed  with aluminum




 faced tape (part no. 6A062, W.W. Grainger) as shown in Figure  3.




 3.7  SAMPLE SHED




        The sample shed (Figure 2) contained the majority of the required sampling equipment:  dry




gas meters,  control units and pumps for the PM(Q paniculate sampling trains used for collecting




organic PM and lead, three Tedlar bag trains, and the train used to collect organics on XAD-2 resin.






                                                13
-------
Htaled Sample Line
                              Insulated
                               Sample
                                                 Tedlar
                                                 gaitj
Sample Sh«l
Sampling Comro
Paniculate PAH An
r
Is
alyzer
1

i

'



2$-
Organic!
Ttdljr Dagi Train fnltli +
SciiinoljiilryX AD-2 Train Intel
Asphalt
Healing
Vessel 4-
Plaiform
Bum Hut

                                                  CEMs
                                                       r	••   r - - - *
                                                       i THC  i   i SOj  i
                                                                                   Hazardous Air

                                                                                  Poliuiants Mobile

                                                                                    Laboratory
                                       ' COi  »   I  NO  i  T CO  I
                                       	-_ I	I  ..___!
;Dala Acquisition
:   SyiScm
I
                  Figure 2.  Aerial view of the products of incomplete combustion facility.
-------
       Sample Duct
 Hcmer
                                           Stack (Sealed)
                                               Tedlnr Liner
                                                 Aluminum
                                                 Tedlnr Wrapping
Air Inlet

J.

i
3
I
1
60.3 cm
3 	 — .- 	 ' 	 £
Platform

= Air Inlet i
ri- (Sciltid 4-
Inopcrablc)


j
Figure 3,  Diagr.nn of ihc bum Inn as configured for die nsphnlt hcnting tests;
             sonic sampling equipment not sfio\vn for clarify.
-------
 The sample shed also contained the paniculate removal device for the CEMs.  A real-time




 photoelectric  analyzer (manufactured by Ecochem Technologies), designed to quantify total PAKs on




 submicron  PM, was also operated using a sample stream withdrawn from the sample transport duct.




        Real-time PAH and CEM samples were extracted from a sampling manifold within the duct.




 The manifold consisted of 9,5-mm (3/S-in) OD stainless steel probes positioned in the sample transport




 duct so that the probe orifice faced the direction  of sample flow and so that all samples were collected




 at the same axial and radial location.  The sample stream was pulled from ihe test facility into the




 sample shed by a slight vacuum generated by'an induced draft (ID) fan located downstream of the




 sample manifold.




 3.8  HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS MOBILE LABORATORY (HAPML)




        The Hazardous Air Pollutants Mobile Laboratory (HAPML), shown in Figure 2, was used for




 the continuous monitoring of the fixed combustion gases. A heated (121  °C), particulate-free




 (conditioned by a low pressure drop heated spun  glass filter) gaseous sample was extracted from the




 sample manifold and routed to individual analyzers for continuous measurement.  A  portion of the




 heated sample was routed to the THC analyzer and the SO-, analyzer.  The remaining ponion of the




 sample stream was further conditioned for moisture removal by a refrigeration condenser and silica gel




 before being routed to the CO, CO2, and O2 analyzers. The gas stream for NO was obtained from a




 location between the refrigeration condenser and  desiccant.  The analog output of the individual




 analyiers was recorded using a computerized data acquisition system that recorded all readings at 30-s




 intervals. This data acquisition system was also used to record temperatures  from the series of eight




thermocouples located in the asphalt Hot-mix layer, within the test facility, in the air input  duct,  and in




the' sample  transport duct.
                                              16
-------
 3,9 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODS




 3.9,1  Pjrticulaie/Semivolaiile Organic Sampling




        Because very low concentrations of semivolattle and particulaie-bound organics (including




 PAHs) were anticipated, the following method was adopted for use in sampling these species. The




 PM]0 medium volume samplers used (shown in Figure 4) have been described by McFarJand.




 Sampling procedures modeled after those described in Method TO-13 (substituting the medium volume




 sampler for the high volume sampler described in Method TO-13) were used for particuiate-bound




 organic sampling.   This sampler provides a cutpoint at a diameter of 10 um  and at a flow rate of




 O.I 13 m /min (4 cfm).  The cutpoint is defined as the diameter at which 50 percent of the paniculate




 is removed; smaller paniculate  will generally pass through the  sampler, larger  paniculate wilt generally




 be removed.  Each  of these two sampling trains included  a filter of 142 mm in diameter (a Pallflex




 Teflon-impregnated glass fiber Filter, part no.  T60A2Q or TXI4QHI2QWW) in  a Teflon-lined filter




 holder, followed by a dry gas meter and dual  vacuum pumps.  Sampling periods of  130 to 165 min




 were used.  The filters were desiccated for at  least 24 h and weighed on an analytical balance both




 before and after sampling in order to determine total  PM(Q paniculate. Additional measurements to




 confirm the completeness of drying were not made in order to rapidly complete analytical work and




 due to limitations on project resources. After the gravimetric data were obtained,  the organic  PM^




 samples were stored under refrigeration until analysis. An acetone and a methylene  chloride rinse of




 the upper portion of the filter holder  was collected when the organic paniculate sampling  train was




 recovered, stored under refrigeration, and combined with the filter extract for analysis.




       A flow rate of 0.113 m3/min (4 cfm} cannoi be maintained through the PM[0 sampler when it




 is backed  with an XAD-2 resin  module because of the large pressure drop  caused by the module;




 therefore,  a separate sampling train was used to collect paniculate-bound and semivolatile organics,




The semivolatile organics were collected in a train that consisted of a 0.95 cm  (3/8 in) ID stainless




steel inlet  followed by a Teflon-coated filter holder containing a Pallflex Teflon-impregnated glass





                                              17
-------
  Air Flow
                                            142-mm
                                          Filter Holder
                              To Sample Shed
                              (Vacuum Pump and Dry Gas Meter)
Figure 4.  PMj0 medium volume sampler; paniculate rnetals train shown.
          (Semivolalile particulate organic [rain is similar,)
                              18
-------
  fiber filter (part no. T6QA20 or TX14QH12QWW) and then followed by a water-cooled XAD-2 resin




  module.  This train was operated at approximately I cfm for a period of 130 so 165 min. The filter




  sample collected in the train operated at 0.028314 m3/min {I cfm) was not to be analyzed but was




  used for a gravimetric determination of total particulars (as described above).  An acetone and




'  methylene chloride rinse of the portion of the sampling train from the lower half of the filter holder




  through the entrance to the XAD-2 module  was collected when the organic  semivolatile sampling irain




  was recovered. The rinse  and  resin module were kept under refrigeration until analysis.  This rinse




  was combined with the XAD-2 resin extract for analysis.




  3.9.2 Paniculate and Semivolatile Organic  Analysis




        The organic PM and XAD-2 samples were analyzed separately by a contracted laboratory.




  Analysis followed  Method 8270 for both semivolatile and particulate-bound organics."  Briefly,




  samples were soxhlet extracted in dichloromethane and concentrated to a known volume. The samples




  were then analyzed by high resolution  gas chromatography/low resolution mass speciromeiry




  (HRGC/LRMS), referred to as  (OC/MS) in the full scan mode. Compound identification was based on




  retention time  and  the agreement of the mass spectra of the unknown to mass spectra of known




 standards. A  multipoint calibration was performed before analysis for a targeted group of analytes to




 establish relative response  factors (RRFs), Quantification was then based on an internal standard




 method utilizing these RRFs and the integrated responses of ions specific to each identified compound.




 Identification of tentatively identified species was  based on  automated searches of mass spectral




 libraries confirmed  by the judgement of an experienced mass  spectroscopist. Approximate




 quantification  of tentatively identified species was based on response  factor (RF) assumptions as




 suggested by the method.




        Because some concerns were raised about  the chromatographic resolution, possible




 interferences, and sensitivity obtainable in these analyses, the  extracts of these samples were returned




 under refrigeration lo the EPA's ERC where they were reanalyzed by Acurex Environmental





                                               19
-------
 personnel. These analyses were performed on the paniculate organic samples only, and targeted a set




 of PAHs,  These analyses were performed by GC/MS using a modified temperature program, derived




 from that in Method 8270 (injection port = 300 °C» initial oven temperature = 40 °C, held for 4 min




 then ramped at  JO °C/min to 250 °C, "held for 5 min then ramped to 275 °C at 2 "Cfm'm and held for




 5 min then ramped to 300 °C at 4 DC/min and held for 8 min) designed to improve chromatographic




 resolution in the region of interest. These analyses were performed in the selected  ion monitoring




 mode to enhance sensitivity.  A  multipoint calibration was performed before analysis for a targeted




 group of analytes to establish RRFs.  Quantification was then based on an internal  standard 'method




 utilizing these RRFs and the integrated responses of ions specific to each identified compound.




 Identification was based on retention time and  ihe simultaneous detection of the quantification ion and




 at least two confirming ions for each targeted compound. The results for performance evaluation




 samples analyzed by Method 8270 and this method are discussed in Appendix A, This method is




 broadly similar to the HRGC/LRMS analysis of Method TO-13.  Our work differed from TO-13




 primarily in the  areas of column (we used a J&W DB-5MS, 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 urn  film thickness,




 30 rn length), temperature program (see above), MS tuning standard (our work used Perflurotributyl




 amine (PFTBA) and carrier gas flow (our flow was 35 cm3/s). We also did no? attempt to calculate
 surrogate recoveries.
 3,9.3 Paniculate Metals Sampling and Analysis




        Paniculate-phase lead was a targeted anaiyte in this study.  A PM|0 medium volume sampler




 as described by McFarland was used For particulate-bound metals sampling.9 This sampler provides a




 cut point at a diameter of  JO pm.  The sampling train included a quartz filter in a Teflon-coated filter




 holder (Pallflex. quartz filter, part no. 2500-QATUP), a dry gas meter, and a pump.




        Metals were analyzed by a contracted laboratory using the standardized GFAA method,'"  In




summary, the filter samples for metals were prepared by digestion and reflux in acid.  Lead was then




analyzed by the GFAA method, which involves monitoring the adsorption of light at specific






                                              20
-------
 wavelengths in the UV-V1S range by Ihe metal analyte after it is atomized under high  temperature




 conditions.




        The metals samples were also used for PM10 total paniculate analysis.  Therefore, they were




 desiccated and weighed on an analytical balance before and after sampling.




 3.9.4  Volatile Organic Compounds Sampling and Analysis




          VOCs were collected in Tedlar bags as described in Method I8t3 and analyzed according 10




 Method TO-1414 (except  lhat the TO-14 target analyte list was not used in its entirety). The Tedlar




 bags were freshly prepared for each experiment.  Multiple Tedlar bag samples were obtained from




 three locations within the test facility during each experiment through three independent sampling




 trains.  A field blank was prepared during each sampling day by filling a Tedlar bag with zero-grade




 nitrogen at the sampling she. Trip blanks were occasionally prepared by filling a Tedlar bag wild




 zero-grade nitrogen when the bags were prepared prior to sampling.  The instructions of Method TO-




 14 for capillary column GC/MS in the scan mode were used for this study. Method TO-14 also




 contains provisions for other analytical methods that will not be used in this study. Compound




 identification for targeted analyses was based on retention time  and the agreement of the mass spectra




 of the unknown to the mass spectra of known standards. A multipoint calibration was performed




 before analysis for the targeted group of analytes to establish  RRFs.  Quantification was then based on




 an internal standard method using these RRFs and the integrated responses for each identified




 compound.  Identification  of tentatively identified  species was based on automated searches of mass




 spectral libraries confirmed by the judgement of an experienced mass spectrometrist.  Approximate




 quantification of tentatively identified  species was based on response factor assumptions as suggested




 in the method.




 3.9.5  Hydrogen Sulfide Analysis




        Hydrogen sulfide was semiquanlitatively assayed using colorimetric Drager tubes operated




according  to manufacturers' instructions.  The sample was collected  from a location within the test





                                              21
-------
 facility (near the location of the organics PM(0 head in Figure 2) over (he course of a [20- 10 190-min




 sampling period,




 3.9,6 Continuous Emission Monitors




       CEMs were used for CO, CO,,  NO, O2< SO2, and THC. The sampling system for the CEMs




 has been described in Section 3.8.  At the beginning of each test day, the CEMs were calibrated and




 their linearity verified.  A  10-min period of background data was obtained with these analyzers before




 the introduction of heated asphalt. This background sample consisted of facility air sampled through




 the normal CEM sampiing.system=during-a period of time when the heating vessel was being




 preheated. Data were validated by the introduction of at least one gas standard and a zero gas at ihe




 end of sampling for each day.  Readings from the CEMs were obtained by  the computerized data




acquisition system at 5-s intervals throughout the tests.  Averages of more than 30-s blocks were




electronically recorded.
                                             22
-------
                                           SECTION 4




                              DATA, RESULTS, AND DISCUSSION









        Because of the large data set generated by this project, the figures and tables that were




 considered of greatest interest to the reader are presented in the main body of the text.  Section 4




 tables, however, are located at the end of this section. Supporting figures and tables are presented in




 Appendix B.  Also, for Section 4 tables, double lines were used around analytical detectable values in




 large data sets containing many analytically non-detectable values.




        Semivolatile/particulate-bound species are discyssed in three ways. These species were




 analyzed by a contracted laboratory by full scan HRGC/LRMS in  the XAD-2 resin extracts  and in the




 Teflon-impregnated filter extracts. The Teflon-impregnated filter extracts were also analyzed by




 Acurex Environmental by a selected ion  monitoring method.  Material collected on XAD-2 resin




 following a filter are generally considered to represent material distributed to the vapor phase in  the




 atmosphere.  Material collected on filters is generally considered to be distributed to the particulate-




 phase in the atmosphere.




        Data  from  samples collected in a facility blank experiment conducted on March  18,  1993 were




not reported because clear evidence was found soon after the test that filter sample designations for




this test had been confused and because contamination was present in the instrument used for VOC




analysis on the day the volatile organic samples from this test day were analyzed.
                                               23
-------
 4.1  MATERIALS COMPOSITION




        The composition of the materials tested has been discussed in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 and is also




 summarized in Table J.




 4,2  ASPHALT HEATING TEMPERATURES




        Despite extensive efforts, detailed in Section 3. the asphalt test material could not be uniformly




 heated,  The material was warmest near the bottom of the vessel and coolest near the surface, as




 would be expected (this is shown in Table 2 and Figures B-l I through B-20).  Additionally, the




 temperature of the material tended to fluctuate over time in a generally periodic manner, This




 fluctuation was attributable to the natural cycles of the asphalt heating vessel temperature controllers




 and  the temperature controllers  for ihe input air of the test facility as well as the influence of manual




 changes in temperature controller setpoint made to control fluctuations in the asphalt temperature. The




 achieved temperatures tended to be slightly  higher during the AGIO without rubber tests  than during




 the AGIO with rubber tests.  This difference in temperature, though small, may influence emission




 rates and should be kept in mind when comparing the emission rates between the AGIO and AGIO




 with rubber tests.




 4.3  TARGETED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS




        Estimated emissions for targeted VOCs are summarized in Tables 3  through 5.  Facility air




 concentrations for these compounds are summarized in Tables B-l through B-3. Data were not




 reported for several targeted  volatile compounds because of an inability to consistently  prepare Tedlar




 bags devoid of these compounds.  These compounds were hexane, methylene chloride,  acetone,




 phenol,  and 2-butanone. The reported data set includes results for 56 compounds measured in




 approximately 30 samples.  Air concentrations and estimated emissions  were calculated for non-




detectable compounds based  on  minimum detection limits.




        Among all  of  the  samples analyzed,  only six of these 56 targeted compounds were ever




detected: benzene, ethyl benzene, m,p-xylene, o-xylene, toluene, and vinyl acetate.  Similarly, among





                                              24
-------
 all of the blanks analyzed, only five of these 56 targeted compounds were ever detected:  benzene,




 toluene, ethyl benzene, m/p-xy!ene, and o-xylene.




        The results for all of the detected compounds were near the  detection limit.  Two separate




 approaches were taken.to determine the significance of the data set.  In the first approach, the air




 concentrations measured  were compared  to field and facility blank concentrations.  Footnotes were




 then  used to mark  those results that did not exceed  three times the applicable  blank concentrations (see




 Tables 3 through 5 and B-I  through B-3). These data are not corrected for blank concentrations.  In




 the second approach, a two-sided  t-test of the differences between means of estimated emissions values




 was performed.'5   This statistical  evaluation, based  on the mean and variance  of each data set,




 provides a more rigorous means of determining the  statistical significance of differences between the




 AGIO without rubber, AGIO with rubber  and  facility blank samples.  Pair-wise comparisons were




 made between the  facility blanks and AGIO thin layer without rubber samples, between the facility




 blanks and the AGIO with rubber samples, and between the AGIO thin layer samples with and without




 rubber. The results of these statistical analyses are presented in Table 6, In Table 6, the value of the




 calculated t-statistic is presented along with the  level of significance, defined as the probability of




 making a type 1 error (i.e., falsely rejecting the tested hypothesis; in this case,  the tested hypothesis is




 that the means are  equal}.55'15 Levels of  significance greater then O.I were reported as not significant




 (NS).  A positive t-statistic indicates that  the first of the two means being compared is greater.  A




 negative t-staiislic  indicates that the  second of the two means being compared is greater.




        Using the first method of analysis, only  the  vinyl acetate results from one test day of  AC 10




 with rubber and  six of nine benzene  results from the tests of AGIO with rubber appear to be different




from the blanks.




        The statistical method of analysis  indicates that the benzene emissions  in the AGIO without




rubber tests and  the AGIO with rubber tests are significantly  higher than the facility blank emissions,




Additionally, the benzene  emissions  in the AGIO with  rubber tests are significantly higher than the






                                               25
-------
 AGIO without rubber emissions.  This statistical  method also indicates that the emissions of m.p-




 xylene were significantly higher in the AGIO with rubber tests than in the AGIO without rubber tests.




 The significance of this result is unclear because neither the AGIO with rubber nor without rubber




 were significantly  different from the facility blanks.




 4.4 TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS




        Tables B-4 through B-9 in Appendix B present the air concentration and estimated emission




 results for VOCs tentatively identified from the Tedlar bag samples discussed in  Section 4.3. Samples




 forwhich data were  presented for targeted VOCs only did not contain any tentatively identified




 volatile compounds at concentrations above the practical quantitation limit.  As for the targeted




 volatiles, the air concentrations measured were compared to field and facility blank concentrations.




 Footnotes were used to mark those results that did not exceed  three times the applicable blank




 concentrations.  Statistical t-tests were not used for the tentatively identified species because of




 limitations of project scope and because  data on tentatively identified compounds has inherent




 limitations on its quality.  In the AC 10 without rubber samples, the tentatively identified compounds




 with concentrations in excess of three times the applicable blank concentrations were in the alkane,




 cycloalkane/alkene, aldehyde, and ketone compound classes. In the AGIO with rubber  samples, the




 tentatively  identified compounds with concentrations in excess  of three times the  applicable blank




 concentrations were predominantly in the alkane,  aldehyde, ketone, and carboxylic acid compound




 classes.  Because relatively little consistency existed among the tentatively identified VOCs found in




 groups of replicate samples, these identifications should be viewed  as very preliminary.




 4,5 TARGETED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS COLLECTED ON XAD-2




        The masses of various semivolatile species collected on XAD-2 resin are  summarized in




Table B-10 in Appendix B, The facility  air concentrations derived  from these amounts are




summarized in Table B-ll.  The estimated emission rates for these compounds are presented in




Table 7. Air concentrations and estimated emission values were  calculated based on the laboratories'





                                              26
-------
 practical quantitation limits when a compound was reported as non-detectable.  Contaminants in XAD-


 2 resin (primarily aikyl substituted aromatics) have been reported by many authors.  The comparisons


 between actual samples and blanks presented below allow judgements to be made about the impact of


 such problems on the results reported in this work.


        The results for all detected compounds were near the detection limit.  Two separate approaches


 were taken to determine the significance of the data set.  In the first approach, the amounts and facility


 air concentrations measured were compared to  field and facility blank amounts and facility air


 concentrations.  Footnotes were then used to mark those results that did not exceed three times the


 applicable blank results (see Tables 7, B-1Q, and B-l 1). These data are not corrected for blank and


 concentration.  In the second approach, a two-sided t-test of the differences between means of


 estimated emissions values was performed.   This statistical evaluation, based on the mean and


 variance of each data set, provides a more rigorous means of determining the significance of


 differences between the AGIO  without rubber, AGIO with rubber, and facility  blank samples.


 Pair-wise comparisons were made between the  facility blanks and the AGIO thin layer without rubber


 samples, between  the facility blanks and the A.CIO with rubber samples, and between the AGIO thin


 layer samples with and without rubber.  The results of these statistical analyses are presented  in Table
                                                        \

 8. Table 8 shows the value of the calculated t-statistic along with the level of significance, defined as


 the probability of making a type I  error (i.e., falsely rejecting the tested hypothesis; in this case, the


 tested hypothesis  is that the means are equal).      Levels of significance greater than O.I  were


 reported as  not significant (NS). A positive l-statistic indicates thai the first of the two means being


compared is greater. A negative t-statistic indicates that the second of the two means being compared


is greater.


        Using the first method of data analysis, phenol was detected at three times the blank


concentration in the AGIO without rubber thick layer experiment, in two of three tests of AGIO


without rubber in thin layers and in one of three tests of AGIO with rubber.  Also, according to this


                                               27
-------
 method of analysts, dieihyl phthalate was detected in the AGIO svithoul rubber, thick layer experiment.

 Butyl benzyl phihalate was detected in one of three tests of AGIO without rubber, thin layer, and one

 of three of AC 10 with rubber in a thin layer.

        The second statistical method of data analysis shows that 2-methyl phenol is significantly

 higher in  the AC 10 with rubber experiments than in either the AGIO without rubber or the facility

 blank experiments.  This method of data analysis also shows that diethyl phthalate was emitted at

 significant concentrations by both the AGIO wi'th and without  rubber,

  -  -   The discordant results produced^by these two methods of data analysis may, in part, be

 attributable to an artifact that affects the statistical analysis  of ihe means of estimated emissions when

 many of the samples are at or near the analytical detection limit.  When a given compound in a given

 sample was not detectable,  the estimated emission rate was calculated using the detection limit.

 Because this detection limit was constant for all samples, but the facility air volumes sampled were not

 constant, the inverse of the facility air volume sampled strongly influenced the calculated estimated

 emission value (see Section I for more detail on the calculation method).  To give some impression of

 the potential magnitude of this effect, a t-test of the inverse of the volumes sampled is presented in

 Table 8, In this case, the bias would tend to make the AC 10 with rubber estimated emissions higher

 than those for the AGIO thin. It would also tend to make the facility blank estimated emissions appear

 higher than those for AGIO without rubber and the facility blank concentrations appear somewhat

 lower than those for the AGIO with rubber.

 4.6  TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS COLLECTED
     ON XAD-2

       Estimated emissions for tentatively identified semivolatile organic compounds present in the

 vapor phase are reported in  Table 9. The air concentrations and sample masses from which these

estimated emissions were derived are reported in Tables  B-12 and B-13, The reader is cautioned that
                                              28
-------
 these data represent, in most cases, only the 10 tentatively identified compounds found in highest

 concentration in the samples (because of the reporting policies of the contracted laboratory).

        The masses and air concentrations of the measured targeted semivolatile organic? were

 compared to field and facility blank amounts and concentrations. Footnotes were used to mark those

 results that did not exceed three times the  applicable blank amounts and concentrations. Statistical

 t-tests were not used for the tentatively identified species.  The tentatively identified compounds with

 concentrations in excess of three times the applicable blank concentrations were in the carboxylic acid

 ester, aJkene/eycloalkane,  alkyl substituted benzene, and aldehyde compound classes.

 4.7  ORGANIC PARTICULATE-BOUND TARGETED COMPOUNDS—CONTRACTED
     LABORATORY FULL SCAN MASS SPECTROMETRY ANALYSES

        The masses of various paniculate-bound species collected on Teflon-impregnated filters are

 summarized in Table B-14, The facility air concentrations derived from these amounts are

 summarized in Table B-15. The estimated emission rates for these compounds are presented in

 Table 10. Air concentrations and estimated emission values were calculated based on the laboratories'

 practical quamitation limits when a compound was reported as non-detectable.

        The results for all  of the detected compounds were near the detection limit. Two separate

 approaches were taken to determine the significance of the data set.  In the first approach, the amounts

 and facility air concentrations measured were compared to  field and facility blank  amounts and facility

 blank air concentrations. Footnotes were then used to mark those results that did not exceed three

 times the applicable blank  results (see Tables 10, B-14, and B-15), Data are not corrected for blank

 concentrations. In the second approach, a two-sided t-test of the differences  between means  of

 estimated emissions values  was performed,L  This statistical evaluation, based on  the mean and

variance of each data set, provides  a more rigorous means of determining  the significance of

differences between the  AGIO without rubber, AGIO with  rubber, and facility blank samples.  Pair-

wise comparisons  were made between the facility blanks and the AC 10 thin layer without rubber
                                              29
-------
 samples, between the facility blanks and the AGIO with rubber samples, and between the AGIO thin




 samples with and without rubber.  The results of these statistical analyses are presented in Table  11.




 In Table 11, the value of the calculated t-statistic is presented along with the level of significance,




 defined as the probability of making a type I error (Le., falsely rejecting the tested hypothesis; in this




 case, the tested hypothesis is that the means are equal).15'16  Levels of significance greater then 0.1




 were reported  as not significant (NS).  A positive t-statistic indicates that the first of the two means




 being compared is greater. A negative t-statistic indicates that the second of the two means being




 compared is greater.




        Using  the first method of data analysis, emissions of phenanthrene and bis(2-




 eihylhexyljphthalate were found at a significant concentration in one of three AC-IO without rubber,




 thin layer tests, Fluoramhene and pyrene were found in significant concentration in two of three




 AGIO with rubber tests.-  Butylbenzyiphthalate was  found at significant concentrations in one of three




 tests without rubber and two of two with rubber,  Benzo(a)anthracene was found in significant




 concentration in one of three tests of each type of thin layer.




        Using  the second statistical method of data analysis, the only comparison that  achieved




 significance was the comparison of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate emissions from AGIO with rubber to the




 facility blank emissions.  The discordant results produced by  these two methods of data analysis are




 attributable, in  part,  to an artifact  that affects the statistical analysis of the means of estimated




 emissions when many of the samples are at or near  the analytical detection  limit.  When a given




 compound in a given sample was  not delectable, the estimated emission rate was calculated using the




 detection limit.  Because this detection limit was constant for all samples but the facility air volumes




 sampled were not constant, the inverse of the facility air volume sampled strongly influenced the




calculated estimated  emission value (see Section  1 for more detail on the calculation method). To give




some impression of the potential magnitude of this effect, a t-test of the inverse of the volumes




sampled is presented in Table 11,  In this case, the effect of this bias would make the AGIO with






                                                30
-------
 rubber emissions appear slightly higher than the AGIO without rubber emissions.  It would also make

 it appear that the facility blank emissions were higher than either the AGIO with or without rubber.

 4,8  TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED PARTICULATE-BOUND ORGANIC COMPOUNDS-
     CONTRACTED LABORATORY FULL SCAN MASS SPECTROMETRY ANALYSES

        The estimated emissions of particulate-bound semivolatile species are reported in Table 12.

 The facility air concentrations and sample amounts from which these estimated emissions  were derived

 are presented in Tables B-16 and B-17.  The reader is cautioned thai this data set represents, in most

 cases, only the  10 tentatively identified compounds found in highest concentration in the samples (due

 to the reporting policies of the contracted laboratory).  Air concentrations and estimated emission

 values were calculated based on the laboratories' practical  quantitation limits when  a compound was

 reported as non-detectable.

        The amounts and air concentrations of the  measured  targeted semivolatiles were compared to

 field and facility blank amounts and concentrations. Footnotes were used to mark those results that

 did not exceed three times the applicable blank amounts and concentrations.  Statistical t-tesis were not

 used for the tentatively identified species. The tentatively identified compounds with concentrations in

 excess of three times the applicable blank concentrations were in the carboxylic acid and acid ester

 compound classes.  It is likely that because of the poor chromatographic separation  achieved with

 these samples, many semivolatile compounds present went unidentified.

 4.9 ORGANIC PARTICULATE-BOUND TARGETED COMPOUNDS—ACUREX
    ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTED ION MONITORING  MS ANALYSES

       Because the concentrations of the semivolatile  species collected were so  near the detection

 limit of the analyses and because there was some concern that analytical interferences  could be

 affecting the results, the semivolatile particulate-bound samples were reanalyzed  by  a more sensitive

 selective ion monitoring method for 16 PAH species that were among the 65  targeted semivolatile

species (see Section 3.9.2 for a detailed description of the method).  The concern over interferences in

these analyses arose because of the poor chromatographic resolution evident in the total ion


                                            31
-------
 chromatograms of the particulate-bound organic samples (See Appendix D). The chromatograms are




 marked with the sample name, date of sampling and an abbreviated type of sample corresponding to




 those shown in Tables 7 to 13, These total ion chromatograms showed  a large region of increased ion




 abundance with widths equal to nearly half the length of the chromatographic run. When the mass




 spectra of portions of this large, unresolved region were examined, it appeared to consist primarily of




 alkanes and alkenes. Because asphalt is produced as a part of the petroleum refining process, and the




 heating volatilization and extraction processes that took place in this study are  generally nonselective,




ithe^presence of high=concentrations of substituted and normal long chain alkanes and alkenes would




 not be unexpected,2  Thus, this region of increased ion abundance is interpreted as the product of




 incomplete chromatographic resolution of a series of high concentration  alkanes and alkenes.




        It was conceivable that this unresolved peak could interfere with the full scan mass




 spectrometry analysis of targeted species of interest in four ways.   First, it could alter the retention




 times of the species of interest causing their signals to not be reported since they could fall outside of




 the usual retention time "window."  However, an examination of the retention times of internal




 standard compounds suggested these retention times were unaffected.  Second,  the interfering




 compounds could contribute ions at masses used as quantitation and/or confirming ions.  This could




 alter the ratio of the quanlitation and confirming ions and cause the signal from a compound of




 interest to not be reported because the expected ratio was not observed.  Third, high concentrations of




 ions from the interfering compounds could reach the detector of the mass spectrometer temporarily




 increasing the level of detector noise (this is sometimes called "ringing the detector" by mass




spectrometrists). Fourth, large concentrations of interfering compounds could "overload" the ion




source of the mass spectrometer decreasing the efficiency of ionization.




       The use of cleanup or preparative chromatography was judged to be beyond  the resources




available to the project.  It was also felt that the implementation of a selected ion monitoring method




would be required to obtain additional sensitivity. Therefore, a selected  ion monitoring method was





                                               32
-------
 implemented along with a modified temperature program intended to improve  the resolution in the




 region where the interferences were observed (see section 3.9.2).




        An examination of ion chromatograms produced during the course of the selected ion




 monitoring analysis showed that these alkanes and alkenes did not appear to produce significant




 interferences at the relatively  high masses monitored during the PAH analyses. It would, however,




 still be possible that this iarge, unresolved peak could interfere with these analyses indirectly by




 decreasing the efficiency of ionization in the source of the mass spectrometer.




        The results of selected ion monitoring analysis are presented in Tables B-I9 (air




 concentrations), B-18 (amount), and 13 (estimated emissions).  Two separate approaches were  taken to




 determine the significance of  this data set. In the first approach, the amounts and facility air




 concentrations measured were compared to field and facility blank amounts and facility air




 concentrations.  Footnotes  were then used to mark results that did not exceed three times  the




 applicable blank results (see Tables  13, B-17, and B-18).   In the second approach, a two-sided  t-test of




 the differences between means of estimated emissions values was performed.    This statistical




 evaluation, based on the mean and variance of each  data set, provides a more rigorous means of




 determining the significance of differences between  the AGIO without rubber, AGIO with rubber, and




 facility blank samples.  Pair-wise comparisons  were  made between the facility  blanks and the AGIO




 thin layer without  rubber samples, between the facility blanks and the AGIO with rubber samples, and




 between the AGIO thin samples with and without rubber.  The results of these  statistical analyses are




 presented  in Table 14. Table  14 shows the value of the calculated t-statistic along with the level of




 significance, defined as the probability of making a type I error (i.e., falsely rejecting the tested




 hypothesis; in this case, the tested hypothesis is that  the means are equal).15'    Levels of significance




greater then 0.1  were reported as not significant (NS). A positive t-statistic indicates that  the first of




the two means being compared is greater. A negative t-statistic indicates  that the second of the two




means being compared is greater,





                                               33
-------
         Using the first method of analysis, significant results were found in at least some of the




 samples for 13 of the 16 PAH species targeted.  Note especially that phenanthrene was found in




 significant concentration in the AGIO without rubber thick layer test, in three of three AGIO without




 rubber thin layer tests, and in two of three of AGIO with rubber tests.  Pyrene and fluoranthene were




 found in significant concentrations in all of the  paniculate samples taken during AGIO with rubber and




 AGIO without rubber testing. Chrysene was found in a significant concentrations in all of the




 paniculate samples obtained from thin layer tests both with and without rubber additives,




 :Benzo(a)pyrene and-benzo(k)fluoranthene~were  found in significant concentration in three" of three




 AGIO without rubber tests, thin layer and i.n two of three AGIO with rubber in a thin layer tests.




        Using the statistical method of analysis, the estimated emissions of seven of the  16 species was




 shown to be significantly higher  in the AGIO thin layer without rubber tests than in the facility blank




 tests.  It is interesting to note that emissions of two of these seven species, pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene,




 have been previously reported from an asphalt Hot-mix  facility.2  The estimated emission of five of 16




 species was shown to be significantly higher in  the AGIO thin layer with rubber tests than in the




 facility blank tests.  The emission of two species was significantly higher in the tests without the




 rubber additive than  in the tests with the additive.  None of these  species had  significantly higher




 emissions with the rubber additive than without.




        Notably, the  significant results using both forms of analysis  come primarily from a middle




 group of the PAH species, from fluoranthene to benzo(a)pyrene, when they are listed in order of




 retention time (retention time  for homologous species corresponds roughly to boiling point). This is a




 quite reasonable and  perhaps predictable result for three  reasons.   First, lighter semivolatile species are




 known to partition primarily to the vapor phase.   Second, asphalt is produced as a part of the




petroleum refining process which includes a fractional distillation,1'   Third, the temperatures to




which  the asphalt material was heated in this experiment may not  have been hot enough to cause




significant volatilization of the heaviest PAH species,





                                               34
-------
        The two methods of data analysis applied are in reasonably good agreement for the selected




 ion monitoring analyses of the particufate-bound species.  This could be expected because there are




 significantly less results at the detection limit in this data set than in the full scan mass spectrometry




 data set, because of the lower detection limits achievable using selected ion monitoring.




 4.10 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR RESULTS




        Table 15 reports estimated emissions for gaseous species monitored with CEMs,  CO, CO2,




 NO, and SO2 monitors did not reveal any evidence  that emissions of these compounds had been




 detected.  A careful examination of the data sets obtained  by the O2 monitor did not reveal any




 evidence of a change in O2 concentration  brought about by the presence of the heated asphalt.  The




 concentrations of all these species remained essentially at background values throughout the




 experiments.  The operation of the real-time PAH analyzer was optimized for sensitivity during the




 course of these experiments.  Thus, the higher PAH levels in the February 4, 1993 experiment shown




 in Table 15 are an artifact of instrument sensitivity.  The analyzer was not used in experiments after




 April 14,  1993 because of the requirements of other studies.  The PAH plots produced did not show




 any clear and convincing evidence of emission of PAHs from the healed asphalt materials.  Thus, plots




 of the concentrations of these  species vs. time were  not presented in the interest of brevity.




        Plots of THCs vs. time did indicate a trend (see Figures B-ll through B-20). THC




 concentrations appeared to increase over background levels and increased and decreased in response K>




 the slight variations of asphalt temperature discussed in Section 4.2,  This sensitivity of THC




 emissions  to variation in asphalt temperature is further evidenced in Figures B-l through B-1Q.




 Hydrocarbon emissions appear to  increase  nearly exponentially with  increasing temperature beyond a




 temperature at which little or no emissions are seen.




4.11 LEAD




       The results of the paniculate-phase lead  analyses are reflected in Table  16.  As with  the




organic analyses,  two methods of  data analysis were applied  to this data set.  In the  first approach, the





                                              35
-------
 amounts and facility air concentrations measured were compared to field and facility blank amounts




 and facility air concentrations. Footnotes were then used to mark those results that did not exceed




 three times the applicable blank results (see Table 16).  In the second approach, a two-sided t-test of




 the differences between means of estimated emissions values was performed.15  This statistical




 evaluation, based on the mean and  variance of each data set, provides a more rigorous means of




 determining the significance of differences between the AGIO without rubber, AGIO with rubber, and




 facility blank samples.  The results of these statistical analyses are presented in Table 17,




      _ Using the first  method of data analysis only one irrthree of the"AGIO with rubber tests showed




 a lead concentration greater than three times the blank concentrations.  No other samples showed




 significant concentrations.   Using the second statistical method of data analysis,  the AGIO without




 rubber, thin layer appeared  to be in higher concentration than the facility blank.  Since in both




 analyses the significant results are dominated by the results of one sample, no definitive conclusions




 should be drawn from these lead emissions results.




 4,12  HYDROGEN SULFIDE




        The results of hydrogen sulfide analyses are presented in Table 18,  No detectable




 concentrations of hydrogen  sulfide were ever observed; therefore, no statistically significant differences




 in estimated emissions of hydrogen sulfide were observed (Table 17),




4,13  TOTAL PARTICIPATES  AND PM1Q  •




       Estimated emissions, air concentration, and amount results for total particulates and PM|0




derived from three separate  sampling  trains are presented in Table 19.  As in the organic  analyses, a




statistical analysis of the differences between estimated emission means was conducted and is reported




in Table  17,  Reasonably good agreement was  observed in the PM10  measurements made with the




paniculate organic and paniculate metals train.  The metals train results tended to be slightly higher.




This could  indicate  that the  filters used for metals analysis are slightly more effective in capturing fine




particulates or that there are slight variations in particulate concentration in different areas of the





                                               36
-------
 facility.  A comparison of the total participates and PM(0 results indicates that the vast majority of the.




 PM produced is less then 10 |jm in diameter,  Particulate  emissions were slightly higher  in the tests of




 AGIO without rubber than in the tests of AGIO with rubber.  This result, however, was not statistically




 significant.




        Because of operational difficulties, the PM10 total particulars measurements made in this




 study may have a particle size cutpoint somewhat different than the intended 10 urn.  The PM|0




 medium volume samplers used in this study were designed to be operated at a flow rate of 0.113




 m3/min (4 cfm).9  Because the authors have not stated the temperature and pressure conditions under




 which this design  valve was developed, we have assumed it applies to standard temperature and




 pressure.  The flow rates achieved (corrected to prevailing temperature and pressure) at the PM]0 head




 are listed in Table 19.  The effects of these non-optimal flow rates on particle size cutpoint can be




 estimated. Discussions with the developer of this sampler  indicate that although the sampler's cutpoint




 has not been  investigated in  this flow range—flow rate multiplied by the square of the cutpoint size




 should equal  a constant.   This statement can be substantiated from the well-known equations




 describing impaction processes  (collection of PM in a PM10 sampler is essentially an impaction




 process).20 This relationship would suggest  that at a flow rate of 0.155 m3/min (5.5 scfm), the particle




size cutpoint  would decrease to 8.5  urn.  At a flow rate of 0.084 m3/min (3 scfm), the panicle size




cutpoint would  increase to 1  L54 urn.  Thus, the alteration in panicle size cutpoint caused by this flow




rate problem  is  likely to be small.
                                              37
-------
TABLE 2. TEST MATRIX WITH AVERAGE. MAXIMUM, AND MINIMUM TEMPERATURES
Test
. Date
1/28
. 2/4
2/11 •
2/18
2/25
4/7
4/14
4/27
5/7
5/24
TesJ
Condition**
AC 10 Thick
AC 10 Thin
Hut Blank
AC 10 Thin .
AC 10 Thin
AC 10/Rubber Thin
Hut Blank
AC 10/Rubber Thin
Hut Blank
AC 10/Rubber Thin
Temperatures (°C) for thermocouples 1 and 4*
Avg Tl
162.1
162.1
25,7
164
152.3
134.4
35.1
141.7
30.5
147
Max Tl
MinTl
Avg T4
167 151 170.2
172
29
. '75
164
152
45
155
34
157
152 j 169.2
21 25.1
151
133 •
113
25
128
28
139
158
153.6
155.4
33.9
152.6
30
167.7
MaxT4
179
183
28
169
168
171
44
169
33
180
MinT4
160 .
155.
20
140
128
136
25
136
26
156

Average AC 10 Thin tests
Average AC 10/Rubber tests
159.5
141.0
168.7
154.7
145
126.7
160.6
158.6
172
176.7
142.7
142.7
* See text for thermocouple locations.
** See text for an explanation of the terms AGIO Thick, AGIO Thin, and AClO/Rubber Thin.
                                      38
-------
                             TABLE 3.   VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO THIN AND THICK ESTIMATED  EMISSIONS
UJ
NO
       Simple ID
       Simple Type
       Co!l«
-------
                 TABLE 3,  VOLATILE ORGANfC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO THIN AND THICK ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (continued)
 Simple ID
 Simpk Type
 Collection Due
 Compound
 l.i-DirMlM-3-lleiciM

 Heptane
* B Compoundt tie Intcil in ftltnitoft time order
Thick = ACID hot-mil without rubber, thick layer
Thin * AC IU hol-min without nibbei. thin layer
MUI. • Method detection limit
D « Air roncenuiiicM of Ihit compound in ihii llniplt it NOT g'rilcr thin Ihree limct (3X) itiil diy'i field blink concenvilion
E = Air concenuilion of Ihii compound in iljii sample ii NOT greater than ihr« (imei (3Xt the iverige fifiliiy blink lit conccnLrnion w JX
   the  iv^ngc H«ld bUnk comrenlratiofi, whichever is grtiter                                      i
G - Compound detected « 'tis thin i priclici) quinnulign lirnil Of 5 nfA.                           '
                                                                                                                                                                        (ctxilinued)
-------
                 TABLE 3.  VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO THIN AND THICK ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (concluded)
 Sample ID
 Sample Type
 Collection Uate
 Compound*
 o-Xylene
 Slyrene
 DrtHnofonn

 Cimieftc
 ! ,1 J.Z.Telnchloroeitune
1,2,3-TrichloropiDfiAne

1,4-DichlafO"2-t!uier»e

PenlachlcHoelhine
  1 .4 •Dklilocobenu ne
  1.5 Dichl«i*cnu?i«
                           MDL
                           nj/L

                          3.5
                            4 1
22

8 I

61

40

200

53

26
 43

 35

 70
                                    TO-IO
                                    Thin
                                   02AU/W
                                      <42
TO- II
 Thin
                                                    min)
                                                 <32
                                                 <5Z
 TD-I2
  Thin
OMI5/9J
                                                            <27
                                                             02D
                                            1D-2B
                                             Thin
                                            OI/I8AI.1
                                           jgfl nr " nttn )
                                                                        <7JD
TB-21
 TOn
                                                                                  <74DE
                                                                                    -------
                      TABLE 4.  VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO WITH RUBBER ESTIMATED EMISSIONS
Simple ID
Sample Type
Collection Djie
Cornflour*)'
DichltnoJi (luoronKthane
Chlorornethane
2'Mflhylprcpene
Viny! Chloride
Brwiiumeiha/ie
Oiloracthanc
Trichlororiuoroftkctlune
1 .1 -Qichlororthene
Cubon Disulfide
fodutncthanc
Acetoniinle
tfinS'l ,2-DicM0ioeih*ne
2-Melhyl-2-P[Opanrf
l.l-0>cMor« [hine
Vinyl Acetate
Cfilofofonn
I,l.l'Trii'hl«uelhliK
Cirbon TcttKhloride
Ocnzcne
1.2 DichloicdOiiiv
FluMobenurie
2-Ctiloro-l.Methylpiopine
MDL
n&t
SO
JO
1 0
2U
23
1 9
I.I
1 8
IS
1.7
IJI
OS
40
1.9
7.0
1.6
I.I
It
2.3
1.7
1.9
06
TB-34
Thin Rub
(WW7/9J
u£/m**min)
<97OE
<««
*
E
clS«
147
<11«
^J"
<7OE
TB32
Thin Hub
(M4/93
p£/m *riun)
^^
<49«
-------
                          TABLE 4,  VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO WITH RUBBER ESTIMATED  EMISSIONS (continued)
u>
          Sample JD
          Sample Type
          CoHection Djie
          Compound*
                          MDL
                          nj/L
lleptine

Trkhlwoethcne
           DibfOlnonielhane

           M-Dicmne
           Urouiodiu'rilofuroethjne
cij-t,3"DicM«opropeni

4-Melhyl-J-Penurt(BK

Toluene
uanj • I .J-DichforopTDprnc

1,1,3 Tni'hltxoetNuie
           TtlracMotoelhene
           2-Hcunone

           Dibroniochlofoiiieihane
           Chloiobenzenc

           1,1,1.5 Tf IritMorocihJ[K

           Ethyl Benune
                                        1,4
1.7

19
                             24

                             27
78

17

I 6

6.J
                                        4 i
                                        0.9
                                        20
                                        21
                                       200
                             196

                             22

                             2.7

                             32
                             20

                             19
rn.p-Xylene


Nonsne
                                        7.1
                                        TB -34
                                       1 hiii Rub
                                                   DE
                                                                   IJ
                                                                     *
                                                                      TB 31
                                                                    Tttm Rub
                                       (ig/m*"min)
                                                                                 <2J8D
 TB-4J
Thin Rub
W/27/V3
                                                        
-------
                  TABLE 4.  VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—AGIO WITH RUBBER ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (concluded)
Simple ID
Sample Type
Collection DJIC
| Compound*
o-Xylene
Slyrcne
Dfomof3UE
<74DE
<49°E
<243°E
<64M
«J2DE
<3J«

<-iO
e=27
«=98
<=7J
<=J9
<-2-l3
<=W
<*32
«:=51
<-42
<«85
ir 9 Compounds ue lilted m tct«nlion time order
Thin Rub = AGIO hot-mix with rubber, (bin layer
-. a Not dciccrcd ii i practical qiuniitttton limit of
  3 0 ng/L and sadsfrcs Ihc coniftiioni for footnote* 0 and E
MDL = Method dcifciion limn
D = Air conc«n.umion of ihu compound in this sample h NOT grcJtcr lltan thtec umei (3X) thit day'i ficfd blank concentration
E n Air cotK-cniraiion of (his compound in (hii umple ii NOT greater thin ihfee limet (3X) ihe ivcr^ge ficitujr fclonk *ir conccnuation or
   jX ihc ivciagc Held blank torKenuatiDn, ^hichcvef is gici^i
-------
                       TABLE 5,  VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—FACILITY BLANKS ESTIMATED  EMISSIONS
Sample lt>
Sample Type
CoJIcciion Due
CcmipoutuJ*
               thane
                         WOL
                         "S'L

                            80

                            4U
  2-MtlhylprojKfte

i  Vwiyl CM grille
CMw«ih»nt
].J DichlwocKwnc

Orbun DiiuifiJc

ludomelhine

Atetonitrile
 U-Dkhlotnethane
 Vinj-I Acclait
Chloiofoon
Cat t
 1.2-Uiihlototlhanc
                            1U

                           J£_

                            2J
1.9

I I

1 8

15

1-7
                            13.1
                            Ui
                             JO

                             19
                            10

                            16

                            I.I

                            IS

                            23
                             17
                             06
                                         TD-9
                                      Pxifity ntk
                                       U2/05WJ
                                       <24
                                          »
                                       <23
                                          «
                                                     TD-iS
                                                   Facility DIk
                                                    02/i 1/?J
                                                     <«
                                                     n of Ail rcmpwnd in this umpk it NOT greilcrtliin ihrM«nKi(]K)rihm antes IJX) ihe nengt firihiy blank «ir concentiaima or JX
                                              Ihc jv{»jg« n^fd fclJnfc coKcnKiia^fi, whti'hev fr i§ gfciler
                                           G • Cufn{murKj tkifcirU *\ ki» than a ptaciiijil quantiiarion Ihnil fit 5 tigA.
-------
                   TABLE 5.  VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS—FACILITY BLANKS  ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (continued)
f - Contpoundi ve luted in rricniiM linie order
Fifthly Dik = Fjcihly Dllnt
MDL > Mtlhod dclcilion linui
D =• Air cone Compound detected ?i ItM thin J pfWlkil quonliulioii limit of 5 nt/L
-------
                   TABLE 5,  VOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUND RESULTS—FACILITY  BLANKS ESTIMATED EMISSIONS  (concluded)
Simple ID
Suiiplc Type
Collection Date
Compound*

O'Xylenc
    Siyttne
Uiomofoms

Corner*

1,1.1,2-Tetnchtwxiiune
    1 ,1,3-TrichIofaptopjine
    1.4-Dichioio-2'Bui<:rie
    PentjcKlorocihane
    I.J-Dichlorobenicne

    1.4-Diciilorobcntcnc
I J-DkhlwotM nttrx

I j-Diinoiiio-3 Chlofi
                          MDt
                          nj/t

                            33
                                Bt
                             61

                             4,0

                            100

                             SJ
                             26

                             4 J

                             JJ
                                7U
                                            TB-9
                                         Ficitaf Dlk
                                          (IMJWJ
                                         UE/(m!*min)
  TB-IJ  '
FKlluf Bil
  02/IIWJ
PE/tm  niinj

  <42BE
                                                        J27°E
                                                            .HE
                                                          <98
                                                          <85OE
                                                                    TD-16
                                                                  fK'lttlf I'HV
                                                                   OZ/II/9I
                                                                        <49DE
 TB-39
iciliif 0lh
                                                                                    MgAnt  min)
  TB-JS
Pjctliij- Oik
 O4/I5W3
 /m *mn
                                                                                                     107
                                                                                                     <«
  TB-40
FKitilr Bit
 (W/I3S3
      min)
                                                                                                                   19**
                                                                                                                   <4Z
  TD-48
Facility  Dlt
 mtam
  TU-l6b
Facility Oit
                                                                                                                                                 n  nun
                                                          <42«

                                                        ,  <50°E
  TB-47
Facility U!t
 05AJ7/9J
   AVG
Facility OIL

PC/(m  min)

   «»44
                                                                                                                                                                             <»J4
t s CompounU) tie litlcd in retention lime order
Fxeihtr nit * r»-iiitr utank
MUI, » Method dcltclton limit
                                           I) = Air cofKtnlulion of Ihn CdnipoUMJ in (tiil tmtple i! NOT |reilcr thin (hrn linvi <3X) ihii iliy'i Held rflanlt concenuiiion
                                           L = Air corK«niriltiiii of Itin compound in Ihii uinplc h NOT £r«lcr (bin three linxt (IX) (lie «>eia[e f-nilny bUnL ail com-cnifition uc IX
                                             (he i»crjgc field Wjnk cunccnuiliun, ixhichevei 11 |ie»tci
-------
                    TABLE 6. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND T-TEST STATISTICS*
VOCs
Vinyl Acctale
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
m,p-Xylene
o-Xylene
ThiruThin Rubber Thin/Facility Blank ! Thin Rubber/Facility Blank
16 degrees of freedom
t-Stal LcveS of
Significance
-1.70408
-3,47471
0.689367
.Q.44144
-2.40363
.0.17015
NS
0.01
NS
NS
0,05
NS
16 degrees of freedom 1 16 degrees of freedom
t-Slat
0
4.196496
-0.38041
-1.4102
-0.56957
-0.6635
1
Level of , t-Siai Level of
Significance > j Significance
NS
Q.002
NS
NS
NS
NS
1.704085
5.593274
-0.63742
-1.3304
1.212698 _
-0.60719
NS
0,002
NS
NS
*.-.= ..NS= -=--
NS
  All tests are two-tailed difference of means, unlisted compounds were not statistically significant in any comparison
Thin/Thin Rubber - Comparison between AGIO Thin Asphalt and AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber; i statistics greater
than zero indicate a higher concentration of the compound in the AGIO Thin Asphalt
Thin/Facility Blank = Comparison between AGIO Thin Asphalt and the Facility Blanks; t statistics greater than zero
indicate a  higher concentration of the compound in the  AGIO Thin Asphalt
Thin Rubber/Facility Blank » Comparison between AClQThin Asphalt with Rubber and the Facility  Blanks; t statistics
greater than zero indicate a higher concentration of the  compound in the AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber
t-Stat = the student's t statistic to test a difference of means
NS = Not  statistically significant
                                                     48
-------
00



O

Wj

C/]
LU
r™


S

*-

1U

Q
S
o
o

Q
o
a:
O




1



2



|




Q


X

U

2


O


O


i--'

U


Q


i-
2  o
T.  i

!  1
E 1

I I
i I
S,l
2 « 3

fll
ill
J 3 »
                                                             I
!i!

IJI
H s f

i-s ?
,= -si
JT - .s
£,! -5
1 = 1 Si
, * i"2
•s
. I!
<• S -o
.2 ~ j J»

| s 5 -1
° t o *
•» S tj M
3 •£ . I

= t < i i
< B .
11*



W



^ll'
                                                             MMi
                                                             ifsti
                                                             < ^ ^ 5 Z

                                                             aili
                                49
-------
                          TABLE 7.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN, SEMIVOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUND ESTIMATED  EMISSIONS  (continued)
 Simple Name
 S«mpJ« Tfpt
 Qtlt of CoHecliSn

 Compound
MDL
 Niphlhafene
                            10
 XAD-J
  Tlw-V
 tas/9}
  ?&
(m *min)
                                   2IM7)C
 XAO-S
  Thin
 IMflJ
  j'S/
(m 'roinj
                    245413°
 XAO-9
  Thin
 Ultf)]
  vsf
(m4%miflj
                        1 10 922*
                                                       AVERAGE
                                                         Thin
                                                                                 <-IJ9JJJ
                                                                                  <*l HO
 XAO-16
DiinRi*
 vim
  flf
{m"mmj
                                                                                             10 1_4 JO*
XAD-27
Thin Rub
                                                                               (m*«mm)
XAO-I1
Thin Ry&
 S/24/93
  ^•^
(ra^'min)
                                                                      93790*8
                                                                                                                                XAD-I7D
                                                                                             
 {m *mm)
                                                                                                           U 171*
                                                                                                                                           phnioI
  10
                                                                                                      <1757*B
                                                                                                                                               fnary Mint, bictjioW lutviclion NOT jxl
                        * - Some vilible di.Tiijt lo f.lln fJgt
-------
                          TADLE 7,  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN, SEMIVOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUND ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (continued)
 Simple Name
 Simple Type
 Dllc of Collection
MDU
(I'S)
 Diclh^lphthilme
XAD-3
TMcl
                                    I4&441
                     XAD-6
                      Thin
                                               (m
                                               32 J?!*8
 XAD-9
  Thm
 Z/IM)
  I*
(m 'imn)
                       396IJ*9
XAO-II
 Him
                                                                      Cm mm)
                                            is oss**
AVERAGE
   THm

   f*'.
 (m**min)
XAD-I*
TJiin Rut
 4/7^3
  f"
Jm 'minj
XAD-J7
Then Rub
 tmm
  f**
(m *minj
                                               J09SI*
XAD-J!
Thin Ryb
 }/3
XAD-ZTD
Thin Rub
 4/27/9J
  f
(m •mm)
                                                          Jl 226**
AVERAGE
 Thin Rub

   ftf
 (m*'mm)
  XAD-I
Fic.l.ly Dll
  2/HAJ
   u^
 {of 'mid)
                                                                        « 191*
                                                                                                                                  r»cii,ir D k
                                                                                                                                    4rt/9J
                                                                                                                                     ft/
                                                                                                                                   (m "nun)
 XAD-JO
Ficiiu/ Olt<
                                                                                    19 795*
AVERAGE
/•tSMf Oik
                                                                                                                                                                                               (m  mm)
 Fluorine
                            10
                                   <2 2I8AS
                                                                                   <-l 510
                                                                                  <3 200'*
                                                                                                       <2 757*"
                                                                                                                                              <-3 435
                                                                                                            OOH*2
 4-Oilmophenyl-Phenyl Elher
                            10
                                                                       102
                                                                                               11 5U*
                                                                                  24 «J*
                                                                                                                                                          •cj. !«
                                                                                                                                                                *•
                                                                                                                                                                                                <-l lit
                             10
                                      2«l*"
                                                                                  •cJ.JQO**
                                                                                                                                <2 J4J**
                                               •C269I*8
                                   *J J7I*
                                                                                   <-l J70
                                                                                                       U04
                                                                                                                                            <30S3**
                                                                                                                          linul
              A ~ Ml*» &f 4hil compound Ml thil umple ii NOT fltltn Ifa* Ulr«c tlmct (3X) lh« •vefige f»ci!rty blank mftis or the imi&e field bUnk
                 whiehttcr it jicilei (ivnagowlll includi detectionfamitj U ippfapfjilt)
              0 • Air coAcrnlralioA of Ihl* compoynd HI gllii sample is NOT greater than three limei 43X) Ifee tvettgt fie:fi[y blank air concent; ihm
              F - The fnus fof lhi» compound in ^*il un^te exeeedt the instalment cafibralion range bul ii wilhm liffiM l4Age
              * « Some %iubtc dannge to filte» eJge
-------
                             TABLE 7.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN, SEMIVOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUND ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (concluded)
Simple Name
Simple Type
Date of Catleeliofl
MDL
Compound (fig)
tulU-EthylhesyDphihiliu
dt-n-OujTphifialate
D«iio
<-7 16]
<-2 S6J
<-2 »6J
<-2 16)
<-2 163
<"2 «6J
K)
     Ttiick - ACIO hoi mil wnl.oul rubber, (hide layer
     TVin • ACID htH'mi'C tviihou! fubbtr, thin layer
     Ttitn Rub - ACIO hot-mi* with rubber, thin layer
     Ficiltiy OIL > Facility blinV
     MUL - Mclhod 
-------
             TABLE 8.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN, TARGETED COMPOUND T-TEST  STATISTICS

Inverse of volumes
Phenol
2-Methylphcnol
4-Methylphenol
Benzole Acid
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Dibenzofuran
DitihylphthalaVe
Fluorene
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrcne
di-n-Butylphthalale
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphlhalale
b!s(2-Ethylhexyl}phthalaie
di-n-Octylphihalaie
Thin/Thin Rubber
t-Stat
-2.314
0.754
-2.878
0.775
• LOSS
1.096
-2.002
-1.915
-0.217
-1.784
-1.851
1.225
-0.930
-1.194
-0.476
-0.73 1
-1.028
Level of
Significance
0.10
NS
Q.05
NS
NS
NS
MS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Thin/Facility Blank
t-Stat
-1.038
1.209
0.095
0.918
-1.038
1.845
-0.807
-1.038
2.767
-1.038
0.571
2.064
0,343
-1.038
0.727
0.501
-1.015
Level of
Significance
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
'NS
0.10
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Thin Rubber/Facility Blank
t-Siat
0.303
1.425
3.228
1.107
1.033
1J89
1.975
0.555
2.225
1.055
1.908
1.062
1.100
0.953
0.982
1.425
0.087
Level of
Significance
NS
NS .
0.05
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.10
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
  All tests are two-tailed  difference of means with 4 degrees of freedom, compounds not listed have t statistics equal those
         of tht inverse of the volume
Thin/Triin Rubber => Comparison between AGIO Thin  Asphalt and AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber; t statistics greater
than zero indicate a higher concentration of the compound in the AGIO Thin  Asphalt
Thin/Facility Blank = Comparison between AC 10 Thin Asphalt and the Facility Blanks; t statistics greater than zero
indicate a higher  concentration of the compound in the AC10 Thin Asphalt
Thin Rubber/Facility Blank = Comparison between ACIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber and the Facility Blanks; t statistics
greater than zero  indicate a higher concentration of the compound in the ACIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber
t-Stat = the student's t statistic to lest a difference of means
NS = Not statistically significant
                                                    53
-------
LO

O
 Q
 UJ


 2
 H
 UJ
 I _-
 c/>
 Q


1
 O.


 8
d

I
UJ
oo
a"
LD
U
Q
UJ
>

I
UJ

ta
Vi
<
a,
&.
O
a.
u
                                                                           3   s
                                                                           i   'I
                                                                           5
                                                                           I   y
                                                                           I1   I
                                                                           «•  X
                                                                           !  !
                                                                           l.|i
                                                                           •• &• c
                                                                           m **" a,
                                                                          ill I
                                                                          5.E ?2
                                                                          -"S II
                                                                          *O 3 * /"
                                                                          II = :
                                                                          ill!

                                                                          Uil
                                                                          & 5 Je °
                                                                          S-.l
                                                                          ' ". t
                                      54
-------
           TABLE 9.  VAPOR PHASE,  TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS -  ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (confirmed)
Simple Nimc
Simple Type
Out of Collection
Compound*
Beniildeftyde
(kntothiiiolc
CM Acid Elkr
CH-C1J Alkint
CO-CIS Alkme
CD-CIS All.nc
C2 Bcnitne
Ci Phihiliic
Diem or Alcohol
Dicihylbcrucne homer
tiN>l E»ter-3-f>henyl-2-Proptnoic Acid
Elhyl EiEer-J-Phcnyl-3'Prcpenoic Acid
Doincilioic Acid. Uioclyl tiler
Hrpitnl)
Noninil
Oclinil
Poiiible AikyTcycIohenne
XAD-J
Thick
nu/n
jig/(m *min)
«4*MH
<46MN
c46Mfl
<46MN
<46MN
C46MM
<««»
MN
<4JWN
XAO-12
Thi.l
2/2SW3
Hg/fm''!!!!")
<7IMN
<7IMN
^,,MH
^,HN
<7IMN
<7|MN
^MM |
<7|MN
<7l"N
<7|MH
	
II»"N
<7l"»
<7IMN
«71«"
C7t"N
<7»""
<7l"N
XAD-16
Thin Rub
vrm
jjgy(ra *min)
MN
3I9M
-------
                 TABLE 9,  VAPOR PHASE, TENTATIVELY  IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS -  ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (concluded)
Stnrple Nune
Simple Type
Ditr of Colletiion
Compound*
Slyiene
Unknown
UnLnowii
Unlnowi
Unkngwn
Unknown wf>t Ovygcni
Unknown w/>4 Ov ygeni
Unknoun/Poifiblt Coclulion
n Mtlti>lbfnjjldehyiic
n-Methyl-n- Piopeny Ibcnirnc
CI4 Hextnedioic Acid Eiltr
Cl Phlnll.le
XAD-3
Thick
1/21/9}
lif/(m*'mtn)
45«MN
<46M"
<4«M"
<46MN
<44MN
^M"
<46MN
<46"M
<46MN
|j,MN
^fcHH
l/(m*'min)
4341
I3JMN
l»-1
JO
Ficilily Dli
3/7W3
lij/fm^min)
766
57
192
' 	 .1'" , . — —
-------
t/)

1
C/)
t/3

Q
2

O
c,

O
U
Q
U

w
O
oi


u
-j


<

O

y


tsi

o.

O

2
ci
O
OS ,"?
Si "I;6
< if ~
t^M
R 5 " 'E
1 1 S *•«
u«
^ S a ,f
^ | » *l
^IgJ
fc :S g *•!
«••
m
c i
= -5« =•
Q 3 of *=
» 'S %~ «
S 2 S Vf
1 1 S *j
„•§ « ,?
*? *° £ 'if
H|s*i
iJH
«i _^
O =
53 ^,E
" P -%;

« " >?
t^S ^e
«_
o . SS »
f -I S 1?

-«- |
ftPl^
1 1 1 1?

-s _.
D 3
S 5
!stmptt t^amc
S*j"njjt« TH*
Uir« of Ca1!c£5ioo
CornpcuM
a
a

s
o

t
•sfS
9
1
*"•


S
1

3
8
1
¥
3
3
?
1
s
?

3
O

3

°
9
<#t
O
¥
ID
g
O

O

r
-C
A.
O
O
"
1

V
1

1
f*
V

«
o
t
V
3
O
9
3,
9
3
Q
9"
S>
R
9
8
O

3_
O

3

V
3
3
3.
e

o

[J M!

5
'
1
O



o

f
3
V
3
S
9
S
g
9
a
s
t

3_
O

§
S
9
9
i
1.
a
O

O

e
m
JC.
I
s
1

3
0


*
1
o


_
^

3
»
S
9
9
S
9
9
S
f

3_
9
*
3
S
9
5
9
?,
O
9

o

1
M
i
o
o

3
9

1
*
I



-
O

3
s
0
V
3
MSI
9
3
g

9.
a
o
i

1
=>

3
W*
V
3
O
V
^
9

o

o
B
1

o

3


1.
?
1



_.
O

s
s
9
%
f
S
g
?
s
9
s
f

1
*
*
3
0-'
o
V
3
?
1
O

o

"5
1
o

t
f
g
f
1
•*"1
^
?
a
O

t.
s

1,

?
9,
?
S
o

0

fe
s
*5
H
B
I
1
a
o

3;
<*t


|

O
o


p
o

3
?
S
9
3
1
9
9^
O
t-*
O

3_
>o

3
S
?
9
O
V
1,
O
r*

O

|
I  1
I'  2


]  f
I  &
m.  m
   S
J*-

.i
 §«S M
 B.-S
•s ff _
« B- S
* £T S
* Ji


|1!


jjf


fl|
!li

111-



S » 5 4J
a « 57
o { I I

11*2
                                                                    HI
                                                                    si*
                                                                    f 3 *
                                                                    i .« s »
                                                                    f f * S
                                                                    I i - '*
                                                                    f Ji o ••
                                                                      <-g
-------
                     TABLE  10.  ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN, SEMIVQLAT1LE TARGETED COMPOUNDS ESTIMATED EMISSIONS ^continued)
Sampfe Ntme
Strn^ft Typ*
Owls at Coflcct

Compound
                          fclDl
                          IMS)
                                     TM
                                     Thick
(m *min)
             IF-S
             Tliin
           (m *fnra|
 TF^tj '
  Tliin
 1/ll/M
  I1?/
(m *min|
                       Thm
                      a^s^j
                     (m *En!«J
  Thin


(m'*mia)
 TM»
Thm Rub
 *nm
{m *min)
                                                        TF-JI
                                                       Thi8 Rub
  ?*
(m *min)
                                   TF-JJ
                                  Thin Rub
                      TF-II Dup
                       Thin Rub
                                                                                                                                        THm Rub
Iutne
                            10
                                   •=0 J02*6
                                                                                           ^0101*"
                                                                                                                                         1.-073I
                                                                                                                                                                                       **
                                                                                                                                                                                       <"0 HO
                            10
                                                                                 <"B 110
                                                                                                                              10703**
                                                                                                                                         «-OT3[
                                                                                                                  <0 750**
                                                                                                                                                                <0 J6I
                                                                                                                                                                                        <"0 7JO
  2,4-Dniiirophtiiol
                            to
                                   M(t liytr
Tfim {£ub - ACIO hdi-mix with lu&lxt, thtn l*>ef
facility Bilk - f'
A *" Man oufflitf compoofld in ifin sJunsMi ii NOT |itM«i lh»n itwrt iira#» |3X) Iht ik-rngc ficilirjr bilnk i«Miii Of ihe «*
   \*fitchcvfi ii g/» aief (ivirig^f «-iH atcluJe defteiion limil* ftt ippfopr MitJ
0 " An enn«n&i*Kmsf I&I compound m AIM Mrr^e ii NOT t*f «« AM Aitc limei (3X) iSe jvfrigt TiiTiliiy bJmt •«
MDL -
                                                                                                            e lj«lsl MluniV jinn.
-------
                           TABLE 10,  ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN, SEMIVOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUNDS  ESTIMATED EMISSIONS (concluded).
       Simple Name
       Stmpfe Type
       D«t erf CoHeetico
                                MDL
TF-4
Thick
                                            ff
                                         (m *min)
  TF-5
  Thin
  2/4/9J
  ff
lm  minf
TF-IO '
 Thin
TF-IJ
 Thin
                                                                                 .
                                                                            (m 'mm
AVERAGE
   Thin
                                                                                           rain}
 TF-IT
TKm Rut
                                                                                                   (ra *min)
 TF-2I
tlttfl Rub
 WWJ
 TF-3J
T1>m Rub
 M-WJI
  M'
(fli 'min)
TF-21 Byp
 Wm Hi*
AVERAGE
 ThiaRub
                                                                                                     (m'Ttrin)
 TF-7
icitiiy BIk
 2/1 \m
  fit
  '*
  TF-2S
F«ifity Btk
 TF-29
»citily BIk
AVERAGE
Ftolitx BIk
   fH
 (m "rninj
        Phcnlnshrent
                                  1,0
                                         <0 702*
          *"
                                                                                                                                                                                    •C0731
                                                                                                                                                                                                <'Q 750
                                   10
                                          <0 702"
                                                                                        <-O720
                                                                                                                                                                         <0 76I*
                                                                                                                                         <0733*J
                                                                                                                                                                                                «-0 750
                                   1 a
                                          <0 T02**
          <0»J3*B
                                                                                        •e-0 720
                                                          <0 70J*8
                                                        <0 7S6*8
                                                         I)X) iht »»nst ficilit; blank rruii a die iiotgc fitld bluik
              Uihichcicr ii gjnttr (i.fujcs wll include dtltcrion Imiu u ippicpiute)
            B * Air ctmctmixioK of dii> compound in ihii umpleii NOT giciitr ihin *»« BBKI (3XJ iht ittrtjt fKilhy Mint >ii CDncenviiioA
            C * Compound piexnl in litwi Jlory blinl. blck|t«und wbUKlion NOT pcrfarmd
-------
                         TABLE 11.  ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN T-TEST STATISTICS

Inverse of volumes
Phenanthrene
di-n-ButylphthaJale
Fluoranlhene
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalatc
Benzo(a)an thracene
bis(2-Elhylhexyl)phiha!ate
Benzo(b)fluora,nthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Thin/Thin Rubber
t-Stat
-0.192
0.503
-0.673
-1.364
-1.351
-0.502
0.251
-0.074
1.254
1.010
Level of
Significance
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Thin/Faciliiy Blank
t-Stat
-0.306
0.912
-0.181
1.038 '
1. 023
1.016
1.008
1.335
1.016
1.043
Level of
Significance
NS
NS
NS
- NS
NS
_,NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Thin Rubber/Facility Blank
t-Siat
-1.015
1.151
0.457
1.826
1.907
__ 2.007 .
0.982
2.683
-1.019
0.180
Level of
Significance
'NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.10
NS
NS
 All tests are two-tailed difference  of means with 4 degrees of freedom, compounds not listed have t statistics equal those of
the inverse of the  volume
Thin/Thin  Rubber =• Comparison between AGIO Thin Asphalt and AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber, I statistics greater than
zero indicate a higher concentration of the compound in the AGIO Thin Asphalt
Thin/Facility Blank «* Comparison  between AGIO Thin Asphalt ana*  the Facility Blanks; t statistics greater than zero indicate a
higher concentration of the compound in the AGIO Thin Asphalt
Thin Rubber/Facility Blank ** Comparison  between AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber and the Facility Blanks; I statistics
greater than zero indicate a higher  concentration of the compound in the AGIO Thin Asphalt with  Rubber
t-Slat = the student's t statistic to test a difference  of means
NS = Not statistically significant
                                                    60
-------
            TABLE  12.   PARTICULATE-BOUND, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS—ESTIMATED EMISSIONS
SJmple Nimc
Simple Type
D»ie of Collrelron
Compound"
2>4-Dim!tliyl-2'p«ni«nol
2,5, i,I I.M-Pcnuaitpcntulccinc
9,tO.An(tirutn:tfiiinc
>CI3 Acid
*C1J Ailwie
>CIJ AHuit
>CU Alluit
>CtS All«it
>CU Alt«M
>CU Aituit
>C1I Alluie
»Ctl AlUns
>C10 Acid
AJlincor CyclgilliTit
Bul)lcyclo-hcx)iphihil«lc
C4 Afty!c)ilo-tit«
^MW
^MN
cjMN
tfiM"
<6MN
^MX
<6MN
cfiMM
^MN
<6MN
TF-IJ
Thin Rub
*nm
Mg^m^min)
 »*mple U NOT gretfef ihin lhi« litnei (JX) Ihe ivrfig; f*cil«(y bl«nV conccnu*iion
(continued)
-------
            TABLE  12.  PARTICULATE-OOUND, TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLAT1LE COMPOUNDS^ESTIMATED-EMISSIONS (concluded)
       Toluene
       Sum pie Name
       Sunptt Type
       Due of Colltcifon
       Compound*
   Thick
  1/2 1/9 J
jjg/(mz* mini
   Thin
  M/93
Hi/(ra''inin)
TF-IO
 Ihin
I/ 11/93
   TF-17
 Thin Rub
   40/VJ
Hj/(in*"min)
 TF-U
Thin Rub
 4/J7WJ
     min}
 TF-JJ  '
Thin Rub .
 5/24/fl
   TF-7
Ficility Bit
  TF-J6
Ficility Bit
                                                                                                                                                                Wttlll *»!•)
  TF-29
FKilily UIV
  5/7/9J
                                                                                                                                                    <*
                                                                                                                                                                    •cS
                                                                                                                                                                                     d*!t in txciuic Ihe dill (i»ck«gt Uinimilltd by the coniticied tiboriloiy far thi> lunple «D incomplete
        •f regaidi ihc lenitiively identified compoundl,
     M - Mtii ol ihii compound in thii lunple it NOT (relict Ibui three (Imet ()X) ihe iverigc flcilily blink mut or Ihe ivelljc lield blank m»i,
        whichcvei it greilef (jvcrijti include minimum TIC irrounu u ippropriiie)          *                j
     N * Ait Goncenir«tian afthii compound in fhtf turnple is NOT |reiier Ihui three itrnei (JX) Ihe iveri|c ficilily blink concrniruion
-------
           TABLE 13.  ORGANIC PARTICIPATE TRAIN, SEMI VOLATILE TARGETED COMPOUND  ESTIMATED EMISSIONS—ACUREX ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES
Simple NWTK
Simple Type
Dile of Collcchon
Compound PQL

Niphlhilent
Aceniphthylcnc
Aceniphrhene
Fluortne
Phernnihrtn*
AiUhricrnc
Fluor inEhent
Pjicne
Ben*of>)jnihr«CEnc
Chrylcnc
Of n zO(b)n uorinlhrne
licnto(lt Jfluor Amhc ne
Bsniofijpyrene
Iradcnott.Z.J-c.dJpj.tent
CHbenro(i,h)*ntruicette
Berut»(8,h.i)ptrytene


005
005
OOi
005
005
009
0,05
0.05
0 05
005
005
0.05
005
005
OOi
005
TF-4
Thick
I/28«J
uCV

OHO
<0033AB
<0035AB
-<0,OJ5AB
0611
OMJAB
06JI
0,4 S6
0 0-19* B
OOS4AB
«0035*s
0 0»A°|
0056AB 1
OOHAB
DON*"8
002IAB
TF-5
TTiin
ZM/91
u&

0,092*°
<0042AB
<0 (M2AB
o.o4iAB
1440 [
0300 [
1011 j
,,„ |
1.437
6654
<0 042AB
^'.tJ
0625
0,201
0.2 6*
0100
TF.Ktf
Thin
I/II/93
yGI

0,153
0 175
TF-17
Thin Rub
4nm
u a/

0,096*B
O.OJ7**
0.022*8 1
	 -""
<0 037*8
04S3 ]
0051*"
I.J95
1.102
0.7 M
1,295
<0.017AB
0,519 [
0211
OOJS*8
0059*"
0,OIIA» ]
TF-21
Thin Rub
tmm
uG>

O.W9*B
0,OJIAB
O.OH**
0.02IAB
0,912
0.190 1
i.912 1
i.«7 1
1 OH 1
2112
0991 I
*J3 015AB
j 0.12J j
0 IOSAB 1
1 0077AB j
OH*
TF-M
Thin Rub
5/24/9J
uGl

0.041AB
c() OHAB
<0 OJIA"
<0,0]I*B
0.011**
0.015^
OI5T
O.J7I
0,134
0695
<0 OJIA*
0295
OOfilAi
OOJOAB
O.WH**
0033AB
AVO
Thin Rub
uO

<-0.06)
<-OOi2
<-0025
<-0034
<-fl.««6
<-OOIJ
<-l 171
<-l.*12
<-O6J3
<-l.9i7
<-«35l
<-OJOfr
<-0,204
<-0,04J
<«0 055
«>0 09*
TF-7
Fici!r!> Olt
I/I MM
iirr
Thin ' ACIO hoi-mix uiihoul rubber, (hrn liyrr
thin Rub - ACIO nol-mii with lubber, rhin liytr
Ficilily BIV » Ficiiity blink
AVG « Avenge
POL « Ptlclictl quinll'llion Itmii
A - Mm of (Mi compound in lM> iiraplr it HOT grcttcr thin ihrrc iimei (3X) the ivciigt fitiltry blink mui at tnt ivengE Tictd bluik mu>,
   whichever ii gtcjlrr (ivtcijti uill include dticciion Itmiii u ippropritic)
0 * Air concctittiMori of (hit compound in this itrftplt ii HOT t^ttct thtf) ihret iimei (3X) thr ivrri|t ftcility bfinfc iir conernintton
-------
    TABLE 14.  ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN T-TEST STATISTICS—AOJREX ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES*

Inverse of volumes
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthcne
Fluorenc
Phenanihrene
Anthracene
FJuoranthenc
Pyrcne
Benzo(a)anthraeene
Chry&ene
Benzo(b)fluoranlhcnc
Bcnzo(fc)fl uoranth ene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indcno( 1 ,2,3-c,d)py rene
Oibenzo(a,h)anihracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylcne
Thin/Thin Rubber
t-Stat
-0.192
1.262
0.664
1.497
0,410
0.914
0.745
0.536
-0.157
0.281
1.892
-1,004
3,285
2.258
1.805
1.491
1.151
Level Of
Significance
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
.NS, .
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.05
0.10
NS
NS
NS
Thin/Facility Blank
t-Slat
-0.506
2.589
-0.506
-0.506
-0.506
1.691
1.689
2.211
2.278
1813
3.890
-1.159
5.815
3J16
2.790
1.741
2.J15
Level of
Significance
NS
0,10
NS
NS
NS
._NS,..
NS
0.10
0.10
NS
0.02
NS
0.01
0,05
0,05
NS
NS
Thin Rubbet/Facithy Blank
t-Stat
-1.015
1.&09
•1.035
-1.841
-1.054
_= 	 l.875_
1,066
2.233
2.354
2.718
2.931
0.971
1.681
2.245
1. 131
0.907
1.925
Level of
Significance
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
— NS=~..
NS
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.05
NS
NS
0.10
NS
NS
NS
 All tests are two-iailed difference of means with 4 degrees of freedom, compounds not listed have t statistics equal those of
the inverse of the volume
Thin/Thin Rubber = Comparison between AGIO Thin Asphalt and AC10 Thin Asphalt with Rubber; t statistics greater than
zero indicate a higher concentration of the compound in the AGIO Thin Asphali
Thin/Facility Blank = Comparison between  AGIO Thin AsphaJt and  the Facility Blanks; t statistics greater than zero indicate a
higher concentration of the compound in the AClOThin Asphalt
Thin Rubber/Facility Blank = Comparison between  AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber and the Facility Blanks; t statistics greater
than zero indicate a higher concentration oFthe compound  in the AGIO Thin Asphali with Rubber
t-Stat = the student's t statistic to test a  difference of means
NS = Not statistically significant
                                                   64
-------
                                             TABLE 15,  ESTIMATED EMISSIONS FROM SIMULATED ASPHALT PAVING
Tel*
Dfte



M,
2/4/91
2/1 tm
»,»>
»*•>
4/7/93

„«,
4/27/91

J/7/93
VM/«







Test
Condition



AC IB
ACIO Thin
Hut yitnk
ACIO Thin
ACIO Thin
AC1W
Rubtwr TTiin
Itul Blink
ACIO/
Rubber Thin
llul Blurt
ACIO/
Rubb« Thin
A»( Hut
Blink
Av| ACIO
Tli in
Avj. ACIO/
Rubber
CO
Av8.
Cone.

(ppm)
-1
11
7
7
9
9

14
NA

»
tl

11

10

11

CO
Esiioiitcd
Emission
(mjCO/
rn /mm)
.,,
193
105
101
IJT
14]

211
NA

197
259

171

141

201

CO,
Avj
COM,


30
66
91
09
SI
3.5

22.4
154

44.9
JO &

J2.I

34

17.2

THC
Av(,
Cone.

(ppm)
6.3
NOP
NOP
9.9
II. I
11.4

'»
12.1

IJ.I
l«

14&

101

(4,4

THC
&tifflll:d
Emission
(m« TWO
m'/min)
«,
NOP
NOP
«..
«
99,1

1 11.0
104.5

IJ47
1694

I2U

n.i

1243

SO,
Avg
Cone.

(ppm)
000
0,02
000
•001
•001
001

coo
coo

0.00
004

0.00

o.oo

0.02

so,
Eslirailcd
Emiition
{rug SQJ

007
U.
•416
-0,21
-0.27
0.2J

010
0.0»

009
11$

001

000

0J1

PAH
Avg
Cone,

C«|i'mJ)
NOP
13425
132
11 5
901
915

105
NA

NA
NA

379

50)6

915

PAH
Etlimifed
Cmillton
{n PAW
(m 'minj)
NOP
16)
10
10
(1
11

4
NA

NA
NA

7

£1

II

PAH
Avj
Rtw
Voillgc

NOP
OOJSt
o.oint
,«.»
00121
0.0122

000407
NA

NA
NA

0907715

0.9 1 967 7

00122

PAH
Avg
Cunrent
pA

NOP
3 SI
0.1272
02226
0242
0244

00114
NA

NA
NA

NC

NC

NC

PAH
Dilution
F«ior


1
0,1
OS
05
05
05

05
NA

NA
NA

NC

NC

NC

CO,
Avg
Cone


0015S
00,43.
00352
00311
00) S6
00424

0 050H
0014

00:29
0.045

0 03&J01

0 040K

00331

Ul
        NOP " Amtyier KOI opcHblt
        NA • Noi ifiil.blc
        NC E StMiinc] on these mcajurifi mere judged to be not felcfan! an4 were not cit&uliEed.
        N'ck  O>u Horn lens in which in insirunimi wit iguliy not opeuMe Kit been deluded from the nblc uvd the itreiigt viluci.
        Dm from diyj <*hcn posl leslt quiitty conKot chccU v<»c fulcd ii included for CO( uid NO (itf iht Outlily Conlrol  Evil union Rtpon)
-------
                 TABLE 16.  LEAD ANALYSIS OF PM,  PARTICULATE LEAD SAMPLES
Filter
QF1
QF2
QF3
QF4
QF5
QF6
-QFI2-
QFJ3
QF14
QF15
QF16»
QFI7








Test Conditions
Thick
Thin
Facility Blank
Field Blank
Thin
Thin
-Thin-Rubi":=1~~ ~~~ ~'~
Facility Blank
Thin Rub
Field Blank
Facility Blank
Thin Rub
Average
Thin Average
Thin Rub Average
Facility Blank Average
All Blanks Average
Thin Pop Std Dcv
Thin Rub Pop Std Dev
Facility" Blank Pop Sid Dev
Dale
Collected
1/28/93
2/4/93
2/1 1/93
2/18/93
2/18/93
2/2S/93
' "4/7/93~~
4/14/93
4/27/93
4/27/93
5/7/93
5/24/93








Mass
mg/sampic
0,0007AD
0.0006AO
0.0005AD
0.0003
O.OOOS^13
0.0007AB
~ aooo3AB
0.0005AB
0.0036
0.0017
0.0006AB
0.0004AB
0,0007
0.0007
0.0014
0.0005
0.0007
NC
NC
NC
Air
Concentration
(H£/m3)
0.040AB
0.045AB
0.029AB
0.000
0.05 1AD
Q,038AD
0.0 I8A°
0.032Afl
0.229
0.000
0.03 5 AB
0.025AB
0.0436
0.0447
0,0908
0.0322
0.0000
NC
NC
NC
Estimated Emissions
j^g/{m~*min)
0.49AD -
0.55AD
0.36AB
0.00
0,62AO
0.46AD
0.22AD
0.38AB
2.7g
0.00
0.43AD
0.30AB
0,5291
0.542S
1 1011
0.3902
0.0000
0.0683
1.1877
0,0304
Pop Std Dev = Population standard deviation
A = Mass of this compound in this sample is NOT greater than three limes (3X) the average facility blank  mass or the
         average field  blank mass, whichever is greater (averages will include detection limits as appropriate)
B = Air concentration of this  compound in this sample is NOT greater than three times (3X) the average facility blank
         air concentration
NC = Statistics on these measures were judged to be not relevant and were not calculated
* Some damage visible lo filter edge
                                                   66
-------
                           TABLE 17,  MISCELLANEOUS T-TEST STATISTICS"

Lead
Hydrogen Sulfide
Organic Train Paniculate (PM)0)
Organic XAD Train Total Paniculate
Metals Train Paniculate (PMto)
Thin/Thin Rubber
i-Siai
-0.664
1.838
1,615
1,613
1.293
Level of
Significance
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Thin/Facility Blank
t-Stat
2:886
0,597
3.444
3.205
3.164
Level of
Significance
0,05
NS
0.05
0.05
0.05
Thin Rubber/
Facility Blank
t-Stat
0.846
-2.014
3.053
2.925
2.375
Level of
Significance
NS
NS
0,05
0.05
0.10
  All tests are two-tailed difference of means with 4 degrees of freedom
 Thin/Thin Rubber «• Comparison between AGIO Thin Asphall and AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber; t statistics greater
 than zero indicate a higher concentration of the compound in the  AC 10 Thin Asphalt
 Thin/Facility Blank = Comparison  between AGIO Thin Asphah and the Facility Blanks; t statistics greater than zero
 indicate a higher concentration of the compound in ihe AC 10 Thin Asphalt
 Thin  Rubber/Facility Blank = Comparison between AGIO Thin Asphalt with Rubber and (he Facility Blanks; t statistics
 greater than zero indicate a higher concentration of the compound m the ACJO Thin Asphalt with Rubber
 t-Stat = the student's t statistic to test a difference of means
 NS = Noi statistically significant
                  TABLE II  HYDROGEN SULFIDE  MEASUREMENTS BY DRAGER TUBE
Test Material
AGIO Thick
AC 10 Thin
Hut Blank
AGIO Thin
AGIO Thin
AClO/Rubber Thin
Hut Blank
ACIO/RubberThin
Hut Blank;
AClQ/Rubber Thin
Field Blank
Test
Date
1/28/93
2/4/93
2/11/93
2/18/93
2/25/93
4/7/93
4/14/93
4/27/93
5/7/93
5/24/93
5/24/93
Time
Sampled
(min)
232
137
167
182
164
151
137
161
fOl
149
NA
Volume
Sampled
(cc)
2395
1389
1842
2031
4182
4530
3562
4453
2929
4172
NA
Average
Flow
Rate
(cc/tnm)
10.3
10.1
11.0
1 1,2
25.5
15.0
26.0
27.7
29,0
28.0
NA
Visual
Observation
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
No Color Change
Observed
Concentration
(ppiw H2S)
2.09
3.60
2.71
2.46
1.20
1. 10
t.40
1,12
1.71
1.20
0.00
Estimated
Emissions
|mg/
{nr*min))
<36.6
<63.1
<47.6
<43.2
<2I,0
<19.4
-------
                                                     TABLE  19.  TOTAL AND PM10 PARTICULATE MEASUREMENTS
Simple ID
Ten Cor Ji lion I
Dlte
Collected
Ncl G*in
Wr-jsht
(«)
Corrected
Volume
Sunpled
(ft'j
Coiretled
Volume
Sampled
(-n1)
Concetti
Flow
Kile
(«''".)
Contend
Flow
Rue
(itiVmin;
AjnVient Flow
Rut il
PM.e Held
(rtVmin)
Ambitnl Flow
' Rjte 11
PM.0Mcid
(m Imia)
Net
Weight
Glin
(MS"*'}
Nel
Weight
Glin
(Mg/m]J
Tc«lf
Pmiculite
Eitimiled
Emitiicmi
(mg/fmin'in1))
ORGANIC F-AR1ICULATE TRAIN (PM|DJ
TF-4
TF-5
TF-7
TF-iO
TF-II
TF-13
TF-17
TF-26
TF-21
TF-I9
TF-J2
TF-33





Thict
Thin
Ficilny blink
Thin
Field Blink
Thin
Thin Rub
Flcilirv Blink
Thin Rub
FKilily DI>nV
Ttiin Rub
Field Dltnk
Avenge
Thin Avenge
Thin Rub Averige
Ficilii) Dlmlc Avenge
All Blink I Avenge
I/2S/93
2AIA93
2/11/93
2J11/93
2/11/93
2/25;93
4/7/93
•4H4/9J
<«7/93
SAT/93
3/14/93
5/24/93





000235
0 CM 967
-OCOI3S
003497
0 CKW 10
002360
001129
OCMXMI
BOI7J9
0.00131
000700
000033
00276!
0,C3«OI
00176]
oooou
ooaon
610291
314334
J7I.279
61644
HA
67143
5IJ JJi
J5I 013
609,407
it 4 191
364.726
NA>
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
17,21
N !6
16 18
1746
NA
1911
16,49
1510
17.26
16 SJ
1605
NA
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
3.94
390
3.76
J«
NA
427
311
3.W
4.04
3.12
3,70
NA
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
0111
O.itO
0 106
Oil!
NA
0 (21
0 101
0,110
0 IN
0.101
O.I 05
NA
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
3.747
36IJ
3.534
3730
NA
4 019
JStO
3.660
3110
1605
3.321
NA
NC
NC
KC
NC
NC
0.1061
0 1021
. 0,10006
1 0.10561
NA
01 131
'• O.lOil
' O.IOJ6
0.1071
D.I 020
' 00991
NA
NC
1 NC
NC
NC
NC
313
9637
-2.41
5673
NA
34 79
31.41
073
43.J7
2.36
1135
NA
4791
61 69
2961
023
NA
1360
34.107.
•150
20034
NA
1721.3
1109.3
15.9
13911
13.4
4362
NA
16945
221* 0
IMS 1
II
NA
1 65
41,36
-1 03
2430
NA
1490
1346
OJI
19 J9
1 01
5.29
NA
2055
26*5
1271
0.10
NA
I
ORGANIC XAD TRAIN (TOTAL PART1CULATE)
TF-3/XAD-3
TF-6/XAD-6
Thick
Thrn
l«S/93
I/4/9J
000091
001641 "
117 196
131 711
5.30
4.50
I.JO
1 II
0034
0033
NA
NA
, NA
NA
J.24
103.33
1149
36497
224
44 J7
oo
     Thick • AC 10 hot-run oilhaul rubber, [hid Jiycr
     Th.m - AC Id hut-mil *>ittiDut niubcf, Ihtn liyn
     Thin Rub • AC 10 hot-mit uiih rubber, ihtn lajri
NA - Not iriilible
NC • Sdiitlici on iheie mcnurci were judged lo be noi rclcvui ind »eic not iilculned.
' Some dimige io Ihe filler edge miy hive in/luenced ihe puticuliEe reluff.
(CQMtinueJ)
-------
«J
.£
C
O
u
U
S
u
a:
D
to
u
<
D
U
ft,
 o
s"
a.
Q
Z.
IS
_II if
• a « •— C
o -K H » "E
i" e *S *i £
{jj uj uj &b

*|'J|
B I'i'?
iZ 3 5 "'e?
"H ** "" ^
J
ft "O
E s|.?
2 « T*C
4 ••"
•g •=•
B * S g
w
Ir >*^
K||J
O **
UK
5 > M
"S s-3
1 1 r£

e ^
If s
"5

c
2
1
o

9















TJ
=1
O
uT
rorAL PARTICUL
z
I
GANIC XAD
O
S

a
Oi

Z
Z
o
o
M
„

£

a
s
O

5
M
e
s

1-tJVX/t'd

GS

i
rt
r-*

*
*
QV
O
2
E

irt
**

aa
§
O

5

K
is
T-9/XAD-9

a

r-
T
s

z
2
o
o
0
_

110627

I

1

1
1
•~
a

s
iM
r*

Z
«
i
o
o
„

I47.7JJ

§
O

g
.a
1
i
•~
*3*

?
*-i

Z
3
o
o
0
^

a"

i


1
1
"F-IS/XAD-
II'

5

5
M
O

Z
5
g
o
M
C*
O
o

*»

M
I
a

£

«3
f
•-3T/XAD-27
H
5

o
r«

Z
«
o
O
•B
O
o

5

O

1
e
™
^
j
H
-

-
n

z
5
o
o
o
as

a

i
o

e
S

d
MI/XAD-I1
1-
T

R
5

Z
2
"
u
u
z

«

IM
HO
S
o






o
r-*

*»
fM
•O
3

Z
*
"
M
u

»

I
O
O


t
.£


IM

g
S

z
-
o
y
o

u
z

i
o


ub Avenge
E!
£


O
*M

«O
r*.
T

Z
5
tj
EJ
U
X

"

-00006


na
<
|
m
.s
iS


^

z
z

2
*
(J
o
S

*

8
o


1
3
«



















o_
2
•*
SO

w*
w
r^.
o
r-
f»
3
Cn
O

w>
•t
•43

GH
g

J5

u
u,
a

vo
CN
•rt

•8
•»
i
O
s
o
o"
^


4S9 OJ!

I
o

1

"Jc
r-
a

^


E
ft
O
4
P
S
O

O

§
Q

5
e
s
£
S

z

5
*

z
z
z
^
<

5

i
o'

s
c
2
Ik
o

s

5
P
R:
O
cf
s
O*
g
0

1

o

; 2/18/9

e
B
VI
If.
a

                                                                            I!
                                                                            T* M
                                                                            S >,
                                                                            E £
                                                                           < • S
                                                                           •< (j «
                                                                           Z Z .
                                                                           III
                                                                           Sis
                                                                           1 • Ctf
                                                                           1j B C
                                      69
-------
                                              TABLE 19.   TOTAL AND PM10 PARTICIPATE MEASUREMENTS (concluded)
Simple ID
Q16
METALS TRAIN
OK 12
QFtJ
QKI4
OF (5
QF16'
QFI7





Test Conditions
Thin
Due
Cotleclcd
2/2S/93
Net Giin
Weight
(g)
0 0303 1
(PM,() (conclude J)
Thin Rub
Kiciliiy Qlint
Thin Rub
Field Blink
Ficility Blut
Thin Rub
Avenge
Thin Avenge
Thin Rub Avenge
Facility Btuk Avenge
All Ul.nki Avenge
4/7/93
4/14/93
4/27/93
4/27/9]
5/7/9)
5/24/93





O.D2337
0 00314
0 G44J8
•0012!!
•0.02187
001057
003 140
004tl4
002&I1
-0 00497
-000466
Conecltd
Volume
Siniplcd
65664
Corrected
Volume
Sunpled
1859
Corrected
Flo*
Rite
(fl'/m)
4)6
Coitctttd
Flow
Rtlt
(nt /min)
0 lit
Tr r 	 ' 	 	
Ambient Flaw
Rite it
(ftVmin)
3915
Ambient Flow
Rile it
PM,0 Held
(m /min)
0 1 101

513271
557.34
554 656
NA
597614
565 739
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
.652
(5,71
15,71
NA
1692
1602
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
III
J.I7
J.47
NA
3-91
J.75
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
0.108
0110
0.09*
NA
0.111
0.105
NC
NC
NC
NC
KC
3,517
3656
3.27J
NA
36(7
1.521
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
; 01015
j 0 103)
0 09267
; NA
',' 0.1044
009970
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Net
Weight
Gun
(Mg/fl5)
46 16

4007
619
10.01
NA
0660
1868
6975
8104
4625
-8 17
NA
Net
Weight
Giin
16301

1414 9
243 J
21256
NA
-12924
6591
2463 J
3109 1
163] 5
-2««
NA
Tout
Piniculift
Estimated
Emmionl
19.77

17 Id
295
34.17
NA
• 1567
too
29(8
37.71
19.11
-1 50
NA
-J
o
Thicl * ACIO hot'iim without rubbci, ihiel li>ef
Thin - ACID hot-mil tvithaui rubber, thin Uycr
Thin Rub " ACID hot-mil wilh rubber, thin lljer
                                                               NA * Nut iviilible
                                                               KC • Stiintict on thrtt mttiuitf utrr judged to be not f(levant and «vrr« not
                                                               * Somv dmmagc to the filter rdgc miy tiavc influrnccd the pinfculitc teiull
-------
                                           SECTION 5




                                SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS









        These tests successfully obtained measurements of a wide variety of emissions from a




 simulated asphalt paving process  under controlled conditions.  Successful repiicate tests were




 conducted both of an AGIO asphalt hot-mix material and an AGIO asphalt hot-mix material with a




 rubber additive.  Though concentration levels were, in most cases, near the detection limits of the




 analytical methods applied, statistically significant emissions of a variety of pollutant species were




 observed (summaries are presented in Tables 20 and 21).




        VOC analyses showed statistically significant amounts of benzene emitted from both types of




 asphalt studied.  None of the other 55 volatile compounds targeted for quantitative analysis was




 observed in statistically significant concentrations.  A wide variety of volatile compounds, not




 specifically targeted  for quantitative analysis, was also  seen in various samples although no consistent




 set of compounds could be established.




       Analysis of vapor phase semivolatile species showed statistically significant concentrations of




 2-methyIphenol from the AC 10 with rubber tests and significant emissions of diethyl phthalate  from




 both hot-mix materials.  Observations of phthalate emissions should  be treated with extreme caution




 because phthalates are notorious as analytical  artifacts because they are present in a very wide variety




of plastic materials.  Additional doubt is cast  upon the phenol and phihalate results since these




compounds were occasionally found as false positives on spiked QA samples (see Appendix C).
                                               71
-------
     TABLE 20. LIST OF COMPOUNDS WITH STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS

Compounds for which AGIO without rubber emissions were significantly higher than the facility
blank emissions:
Benzene
Diethy) Phthalate
Naphthalene
Fiuoranthene
Pyrene
Chrysene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(,l ,2,3-cd)Pyrene
Lead
PMIO Paniculate (as measured on both trains)""
Total Paniculate           	

Compounds for which AGIO with rubber emissions were significantly higher than the facility
blank emissions:
Benzene
2-Methyl Phenol
Diethyl Phthalate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fiuoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(a)pyrene
PM10 Paniculate (as measured an both trains)
Total Participate

Compounds for which AC10 without rubber emissions were significantly higher than AC10 with
rubber emissions:
Benzo(lc)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrerie

Compounds for which AC10 with  rubber emissions were significantly higher than AC10 without
rubber emissions:
Benzene
m,p-Xylene
2-Methyl  Phenol
                                           72
-------
         TABLE 21.  SUMMARY OF LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE AND ESTIMATED EMISSION VALUES
Compound
.Benzene
2-Methyl Phenol
Dicthy! Phihalaie
bis(2-ethy Ihexy l)phthalaic
Naphthalene
Fluoranthene
Pyrenc
Benzo(a)anthracenc
Chrysene
Benzo(k)fluoranlhenc
Bcnzo(a)pyrcne
[ndeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrcne
Lead
PM|0 Paniculate (organic train)
Total Paniculate (organic XAD-2 train)
PM|0 Paniculate (metals train)
AC 10 Wiihoul Rubber vs.
Facility Blank
Level of
Significance*
0.002
NS
0,10
NS
0.10
0.10
0.10
NS
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Estimated
Emissions
fig/(m''min)
<=57
<=7.2
~<*32,7
<=5.l
<=O.I03
<= 1.648
<= 1.469
<=Q.7&6
<=4,420
<=1.I06
<-0.660
<=0,I4I
<=0,542
26,850
27,700
37,710
AGIO With Rubber vs.
Facility Blank .
Level of
Significance
0.002 '
0.05
0.10
0.10
NS
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.05
NS
0.10
NS
NS
0.05
0,05
0.10
Estimated
Emissions
Pg/(nr*min)
<«*IIO
<=23.7
<=34,37
<«*5.3
<=0.063
<=t.!78
<=1.612
<=0.653
<=t.957
<=0.306
<=0.204
<=0.065
<=1.10
12,710
12.950
19,810
  NS= Not statistically significant at >90% confidence level.
  • = Level of significance is defined as the probability  of making a type I error (i.e.,
  hypothesis, in this case the tested hypothesis is that the means are equal)
of fakely rejecting ihc tested
        None of the other semivolatile species targeted showed statistically significant emissions in the

vapor-phase analyses.

        Analysis of particulate-phase semivolatile species by full scan mass spectrometry showed

statistically significant concentrations of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.  To reiterate, observations of

phthalate emissions should be treated with extreme caution because phthalates are notorious as
                                                  73
-------
  analytical artifacts and are present in a very wide variety of plastic materials. None of the other


  sem[volatile species targeted showed statistically significant emissions in the PM analyses.


          Because some PAH species were observed at concentrations near the detection limit in the full

                                                                                                   *
  scan mass spectrometry analyses and analytical interferences from hydrocarbon coeluters were


  suspected, an additional analysis of semivolatile particulate-phase samples was conducted by a more


  sensitive selected ion  monitoring method. This  analysis targeted 16 PAH species of primary interest to


  the project and revealed statistically significant emissions of seven of the 16 species when  the AGIO


- -thin-without rubber tests were compared to the facility blank tests.  The emissions of five of 16 PAH


  Species were significantly higher in the AGIO thin with rubber tests than in  the facility blank tests.


  The emissions of two species were significantly  higher in the tests without the rubber additive than in


  the tests with the additive.


         No statistically significant emissions of hydrogen sulfide were  found in these tests.  A very


  low level of lead may have been emitted in the AGIO thin without rubber tests.  Statistically,


  significant emissions of both total particulates and PM)0 were found from both types of asphalt hot-


  mix material tested.


         The estimated emission values measured in this work could be combined  with appropriate fate


  and transport data to model the exposure of populations (either occupational or general) to pollutants


  generated in the asphalt  paving process.  To facilitate such a modeling effort, the emissions results


  have  been presented as a function of asphalt surface area so that emissions from the paving  of an area


  of road could be estimated based on the road  length and  width.  Modelers should, however, recall  the


  limitations of this pilot-scale study, especially those discussed in Section 3,1. The facility air


 concentrations reported in this  work should not  be used  directly to  evaluate risk to exposed


 populations because exposure scenarios will vary widely.


        Although some statistically significant differences were found between the emissions from  the


 asphalt materials tested with and without rubber,  these differences were not,  in general, dramatic.   In



                                                 74
-------
addition, although the emissions for some pollutants, such as benzene, were significantly higher in the




rubber containing asphalt, the emissions of other pollutants, such as benzo(k)fluoranthene, were higher




in the non-rubber containing asphalt.  Therefore, the data gathered  in these experiments indicate that




the addition of rubber to asphalt hot-mixes does not have a dramatic impact on the air emissions




generated in the paving process.




        As we discussed in section 3.!,  the results .presented in this report were obtained from




measurements of emissions from a static layer of asphalt maintained at a constant temperature.  We




believe  that experiments in which asphalt is disturbed, as  it is in the road building process, would




result in the measurement of higher levels of emissions.  The statistically significant emissions of




carcinogens, such as benzene, measured in this work are a cause for concern and merit a careful risk




assessment to determine if personnel exposed to  air emissions during road construction or asphalt




manufacturing processes are at risk.
                                               75
-------
                                        SECTION 6

                                       REFERENCES
 l.~  Kirk-Othm'er Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd Ed Vol 3, John Wiley and Sons, New
    York, pp 285-327,

2.,  "Asphalt Hot-mix Emission Study," Asphalt Institute Research Report75-1. NTIS Report
    PB-250-504, 1975.

3.  Takada, H.,  T. Onda and N, Ogura, "Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in
    Urban Street Dusts and their Source Materials by Capillary Gas Chromatography,"
    Environmental Science and Technology. 24. 1179-1186(1990),

4.  EPA Report to Congress, June, 1993,  Based on "Engineering and Environmental Aspects of
    Recycled materials  for Highway Construction," FHWA-RD-93-088, submitted to the Federal
    Highway Administration  by Marc Odin et al. Syracuse Research Corporation, Syracuse, NY,
    May 1993.

5.  Public Law  102-240, The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 18 December
    1991, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

6,  Personal communication from Roy Hamlin, Asphalt Rubber Systems Corporation, Riverside, RI,
    July 1993.

7,  American  Society for Testing and Materials, Annual J3ook oJiASTM Standards. 1990,

8,  The Asphalt Handbook. The Asphalt Institute Manual Series No. 4 (MS-4). 1989 edition,

9.  McFarland, A.R. and C,A. Ortiz, "A 10 ^m Cutpoint Ambient Aerosol Sampling Inlet,"
    Atmospheric Environment.  Vol 16, No.  12, pp 2959-65, 1982.

10.  Winberry, W.T. , NT. Murphy, R.M. Riggan, Compendmn^ofMethods for the
    Determination of Toxic Organic Cgrnpounds inj^mfaient Air. Method TO-13 "Determination
    of Benzo(a)pyrene and other Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air Using Gas
    Chromatographic and  High  Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis" Quality
    Assurance Division, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, EPA/600/4-89/017
    (NTIS PB90-127374),  June 1988.
-------
 11.  Method 8270 in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes. Vol. IB, Field Manual
     Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA SW-846 (NTIS PB88-239223), September 1986.

 12.  Method 7421 in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes. Vol. 1A, Field Manual
     Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA SW-846 (NTIS PB88-239223), September !986,

 13.  40 - Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 53-60, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 18, Revised as
     of July  1, 199!, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1991.

 14.  Wirtberry, W.T., N,T. Murphy, and R.M. Riggan, Compendium of .Methods for the
     Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, Method TO-14 "The
     Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air using Summa  Passivated
     Canister Sampling and Gas Chromatographic Analysis" Quality Assurance Division,
     Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, EPA/60G/4-89/017 (NTIS PB90-127374),
     June 1988.

 15.  Hays, William H., Statistics 3rd Ed, CBS College Publishing, New York,  1981.

 16.  Byrkit, Donald R., Elements of Statistics, An Introduction to Probability and Statistical Inference,
     3rd Ed.  D. Van Nostrand Co., New York, 1980.

 17.  Krieger, Mark S. and R. A. Hites "Diffusion Denuder for the Collection of Semi volatile Organic
     Compounds," Environmental Science and Technology, 26:1551-1555, 1992,

 18.  Wallace, H.A. and J.R. Martin, Asphalt Paying Engineering. McGraw Hill Books: New York,
     1967.

 19.  McFarland, Andrew, Carlos Ortiz, Texas A&M University. Personal communication to
     Chris Lutes, September  1992,

20.  Hesketh, H.E. Fine Particles in Gaseous Media, Lewis Publishers:  Chelsea, Ml, 1986,
     pp 109-118.
                                            77
-------
                                          APPENDIX A




                          QUALITY  CONTROL EVALUATION REPORT









      This (ask was conducted under the guidance of an EPA-approvcd QA Test Plan (AEERL




  Category Hi) and a Facility Manual for the test facility. This plan was used to establish data quality




  objectives suitable for this study.  The quality control measures employed during this study were used




  to ensure that the data collected would be suitable 10 measure air emissions resulting from  a simulated




  paving process,




      Table A-1  presents the data qualicy indicator (DQ!) summaries for accuracy, precision, and




 completeness achieved  during testing along \vjth (he  planned  DQI goals for each respective




 measurement or analysis performed. In general, (he  intended DQI goals were achieved.  In several




 instances, however, targeted DQI  goals were not achieved or could not be measured from the available




 data,




     The  accuracy of volatile organic measurements made for this project was intensively investigated




 by preparing five quality control evaluation samples.  These samples were prepared were as dilutions




 of a gas mixture produced and certified by Scotl Specialty Gases,  These samples contained five of ihe




 targeted volatile organics measured in this project  nnd a sixth  non-iargetcd species.  The dilutions




 were prepared by the Acurex  Environmental Task  Lend and submitted blind io the volatile:  analyst.




 Because (he gas  stock was purchased before the project began and because of limitations  in  the




dilution preparation equipment, we.were not able IQ prepare evaluation samples ni as low a




concentration as  was seen in the field samples.  However, over the range evaluated, there docs  not
-------
 appear 10 be a strong relationship between bias and concentration. The results of analyses of these




 samples are reported in Table A-2.  Nineteen of the 25 measurements came within the acceptable




 range of ±35 percent set in the QA  Test Plan, In genera!, ihs analytical concentrations observed were




 lower than the target concentrations.  The substantial variation observed in  the bins percentages for




 many of the samples would suggest that the inaccuracies observed do not stem from difficulties in the




 preparation of the dilutions.




      Table"A-3 presents data  on ihe recoveries of surrogates spiked imo the volatile* samples before




 analysis.  These recoveries are generallyexcellent regardless of sample typ£"(AC!0, ACID with




 rubber, or facility blank).




      The volaiiles analyses were also subject lo a QA audit.  The  auditor's report questions about




 procedure were fully addressed in an Acurex Environmental response.




      The EPA/AEERL QA Officer prepared blind semivolaules performance evaluation samples which




 were submitted 10 the contracted laboratory.  The results of this evaluation are contained  in data tobies




 in Appendix C and in Table A-4. The results of this evaluation were generally good except for low-




 boiling semivolavile compounds spiked onto Teflon-impregnated filters. These low-boiling compounds




 are known to be  distributed almost entirely to the paniculate phase.!S  In addition, gravimetric




 methods requiring filter desiccation were used lo determine paniculate loadings on these samples (see




 Section 2).  Thus, the assessment of recoveries from filters of low-boiiing semivohiiles could be




 viewed as  irrelevant.




     Tables A-5 and A-6 present data on the recoveries of surrogates,spiked  into thfc vapor phase and




 paniculate-bound semivolatile samples, AH  of these recoveries meet the compound-specific recovery




 criteria set by Method S27Q (listed in the first  column of Tables A-5 and A-6).  A  few of the recovery




 values do not meet ihe general criteria of 50-150  percent recovery  discussed  in the QA Test Plan but




do, however, meet Method 8270 performance criieria.
                                              A-2
-------
      Tables A-7 and A-4 present a comparison between results obtained using the (Method S270) full-




 scan mass spectrometry method used by ihe contracted laboratory and the results obtained using the




 selected  ion monitoring method used by Acurex Environmental personnel working in an EPA facility.




 Table A-7 makes this comparison for the actual field samples for  16 PAH species in  12 samples.  The




 results obtained for the four lowest boiling PAH species (from naphthalene to fluorene) arc nil non-




 deiccls in the contracted analyses. The results  for these species obtained by Aeurc.x  Environmental




 were non-detecls or results well below the detection limit of the contracted analyses.  The medium




 boiling PAH species (phenamhrenc to pyrene) show some agreement in trends, especially for those




 samples obtained after February 18,  1993.  Note also with the series .of samples (TF-4. TF-5, TF-10,




 and TF-13) that although the trends in total particulaie per sample (Table 14) are closely paralleled by




 the results of the selected ion monitoring analyses, they are poorly paralleled  by the results of the full-




 scan analyses.  It should be noted also that these samples were submitted 10 the contracted laboratory




 in  four batches.  Senior personnel of the contracted laboratory were made aware of the Acurex




 Environmental Task Lead's concerns about the chromatographic resolution and accuracy of the first set




 of  these analyses soon after ihe results of this first  set of analyses were reported. Contracted




 laboratory personnel were also aware lhat after Ihe  analysis of this first set of samples, sample extracts




 were being returned for further analysis by Acurex  Environmental personnel.  It is possible lhat this




 led to more vigilance in the analysis of later samples. Agreement for the later eluting PAH species




 (benzo(a)amhracene to ben2o(g.h.i)perylenc] is relatively poor. This may be attributable to




 interference with the full-scan mass spectromelry analyses and the fact lhat many of the analyses were




 apparently at concentrations below the detection limit of the fuil-scan analyses.




     The author of this report docs not intend to imply that the contracted laboratory did not perform




 up to ihe cxpeeiaiiotis of the  method.   Rather, il should be kept in mind thai there are advantages and




disadvantages in the use of standardized methods.  Method S270 wiihout modification or ihe use of
                                               A-3
-------
  cleanup chromatography is probably not well suited for delecting targeted species obscured by high




  concentrations of coeluting compounds.




      Table A-4 compares the PAH full scan and SIM results for spiked performance evaluation




  samples.  In general, these results are quite similar.




      DQIs for the continuous emission monitors (CEMs) are discussed in Tables A-S and A-1.  In




  general, the 0-,,  CO2, and SO, analyzers functioned quiie well.  The CO and THC analyzers




  functioned quite well in accuracy tests but did not generally meet the strict linearity test discussed in




  Table,A=S._The degree of-deviation-from linearity is discussed in ilid" footnotes in Tab!e~A-S  and, in




  almost all cases, was less then 5 percent of instrument  full scale, though frequently above Uie staled




  criteria of 2 percent of instrument full scale. The performance of the NO analyzer was rather poor,




  especially in later tests. However, when the analyzer was functional, -no indication of NO emission




 could be detected.  Thus, the  poor performance of the NO analyzer had a minimal impact on project




 goals.




     The EPA/AEERL  QA Officer prepared blind performance evaluation samples which were




 submitted  to the  contracted laboratory used for lead analyses. The results of these analyses are




 discussed in Appendix C and  Table A-l.  Reported concentrations were fairly precise but not very




 accurate (values reported were approximately 50 percent of spiked concentrations).  This result could




 be attributable to an actual analytical  inaccuracy or an artifact of the spiking  method.  This inaccuracy




 is of some concern.  However, nearly all of the lead results were in excess of the analytical detection




 limit, so that this poor recovery did not cause unjustified non-detecis.  In addition, the average lead




 estimated emissions were relatively low and were quite  similar for the AGIO  without rubber, AGIO




 with rubber, and facility  blank tests (Table 16), although the  AGIO without rubber value did achieve




statistical significance.
                                              A-4
-------
     The accuracy goal of ±25 percent for the flow rates of the PM,0 was achieved in all cases (see




 Tables A-l and 19).  The observed  variations in flow rate should noi have a dramatic impact on data




 quality (see the discussion of cutpoint and flow rate in Section 4.13),




     Facility,  field, and/or  laboratory blanks were collected routinely for aU  of the measurements




 performed during  this study.  The results of these blank analyses ore described in the respective data




 presentation sections  of this report.  The test data have not, been corrected for blank values.  Data




 have, however, been  footnoted in instances where analyte levels in blank samples were sufficient to




 cause concern about tlie  validity of the values reported.  Where feasible, blank levels have been




 presented along wkh  the actual test daia.




     Control of asphalt heating temperatures was vital for the success of this study, although no




 specific DQI goals were  set for this  parameter,  This control was adequately achieved, although not in




 as narrow a temperature  band as initially hoped (See Sections 3,5 and 4.2).




     In summary, the QA project objectives sel forth have been adequately met in most cases, and the




data collected  from this study are sufficient to meet project  objectives.
                                              A-5
-------







C/5
Is
u
2
oi
a
D
10
UJ
2
U
p
ci
U
^
O
t/1
H
U
til

a
O
t
^
D
O
1-
n
•7
i 	 j
a








V
T C
•iis
; I
o
"3 P
.r S e«
•c ^ —

^ e -^

< z. —




^
? * S
,S 3 =>

••
r ?
li
S I

r t
|.s£
a ^



.IMS
Hi
O c_ ~*


u kh •»•••
,i Jj 3
0 < -






C
V
s
3
9



5


o



™


—


D



z





o












0"




•^


g



_


O


a



5





o












d'
3



z


0



^


-


o



y.





o












O
U
5



•^


«



, 	 ,.


j;


a



Y,





O












U
S



2


5



	 -.


S


g



£





—












o
X,
3



z


-









=



2





—












2
S



0
ft


s



%





r-



w'.





rt









"e
£
o
*5
5



6


vi



-----


^


a


s
s





"





"n
w
b*
6
O
1
£_
"e
u
5
C
3



x


x









3



*^





"^








„
1=
3
e
^
-3
S



/,


*









o
r-



"'-





H








-
j;-
c
w
5
3





«
a









s



•f.





"












5
s






•*






s


5



7,





"






44
1"
D
^».

_.
*
O
                                          11

                                    < ft I/I 1*1 VI
A-6
-------
              TABLE A-2.  ASPHALT PROJECT VQLATILES QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
Compound
Molecular Weight (chtions}
Full Strength Manufacturers
Concentration (ppmv)
Full Strength Manufacturers
Concentration (ng/L)
Sample TB-29
Dilution Factor
Target Conccruriuton (ng/L)
Reported Conccmraiion (nc/L)
ft Bias
Sample TB-54
I ..Diluiion Factor
J Target Concentration (ns/L) "
| Reported Concentration (nc/L}
|_ % Bias
[Sample TB-S5
1 Dilution Factor
J Target Concentration (nc/L)
J Reported Concentration (nc/L)
To Bias
Sample T8-56
* Diluiion Factor
Target Concentration (ng/L)
Reported Conccmrmion (ng/L)
5n Bins
Sample TB-57
Dilytion Factor
Target Concenlrniion (»g''L)
Rcponcd Concenlrniion (nc/L)
% Bias
Benzene
7S,n
1,05
3661

0.3111
1S39
7C2
43.11

0.1790
655
1067
62.S2

0.03S2
140
160
14,30

0,0309
113
too
•11,50

0,0150
53
44
•19.99
Tohionc
92,14
1.03
4237

0,3111
I3IS
948
•2S.08

0.1790
75S
1 093,5
44,47

0.03S2
162
174
7.41

0.0309
131
103
-2 US

0.0150
«
47
-26.67
Chlorobciuciic
1 1 156
1.06
5327

0,3)11
1657 '
1177
•23.97

0.1790
953
IW2
9.30

0.03S2
204
ISO
-7.19

0.0309
I&4
120
-26.97

0.0150
SO
56
•30, -5 2
m-Dichlorobcn/ctii
1 47,00
0.849
5572

0.3 HI
1733
12QS
•26,85

0.1790
997
69S.5
.29.95

0.03S2
213
IGS.S
-20.90

0.0309
172
95
•44.71

0.0 ISO
S3
46
.43,4$
o-Xylciic
106.17
l.tfi
54 9S

0.3 III-
1711
1236
-27,74

0.1790
9S4
1217 .
23.67

0.03S2
210
204.5
-2.71

0.0309
170
IfO '
-35.16

0,0150
82
52
-36.70
NA = Not a targeted nn.llyic
                                          A-7
-------




t/1
•—
oi
til
O
( i
UJ
UJ
H
o
C£>
^>
v;
y

o

X
t-
o
U
D
2
O
a,
S
O
u
2
O
UJ
j
r—
_1
O
>
«n
n

a
l_


= H

ill"
Jri *""*
sii"

r 5 s
szl*
s.*s«
_
- _
g3@*
o

n\*

**
£ * c

** «: ^
H o
r, « §
O
•7 - S
e
£t « ^
i * = *
H o
_
~ 1 S_»
S » 5
2 e 5

O
z .5
o
a

u
ft*
Oi
S
21
U"l
3

„,

*

•O
"
3

3


2

§


c*
D

5
a

i-v

£

•in

a
e
*«
•£
1
1
i
^
2

™

^

0-
"
«

«


S.

^*


™*
S

S
c*

s

0

*ta

=
c
•£
r^j
ts
r-

s

C1

C"

g

8


S

z



*a

M
.

kM,
C"

-»

s>

•a

3
"j§
»J
S

S



„

Cr-

?


to

o



2

ft
o

5

0

"•

5
c
c
a
3
1
3




tn
tu
ei
O
u
UJ
UJ
H
O
S
£:
en
UJ
, _ §
Hi
•— •
£
o
O
a
z
c.
O
U
y
o
o
u
J


.
£>
n
UJ
a





s => 5
^ i S
^ 3 'C
*" if 3

So?
"if a
si*
"»"•.« <• ^

^f *^
£ 3
J3
MI*

T«S
= ,E C
-es
, -s a
i * S ^
= a c
s a
"a ^
"7 ac ^

9

s


*x

«
=

***
3

t-fl

=
_
*t

O-
i

_
•a


*»


•S
a
8
C



CN

5


T

3»
«•

a*
8

v*

«

_•

•w
*^
_

CJ
8


C*
-d


1
5



*»
e*

~


w

jj*
- s

-1
£

ti

^i
"
3

S
i

r*
C*
•n
c*.


S


?
s
15



•nf\

5


2

c*


r-i
3

z

2

w«t

1
1

s


3
S

y
c
I
i
3






"1
UJ
'r
O
o
a
LU
o
o
ci
ci


-J
O
r—

u
<
o
o
a.
2
o
u
u
z
o
5
iy

_j
O

f^i
<
tu
C3








*•"• o


III*
•i °
i -
= f 5 ""


o*3
h * a
«.
sis


•M
3 •!;«*
K ^ 3
""
'
; ^p"
^~ *3
*™
e- 5 5
e*|




o
s
Wl





_



S

-



m

Z


3

D

I**

z



c
1"!
If
i
5
5





x



e*

»



o-

5


KM

..

3

Z



1
a
5
~o





S



is

-S



-

a


a

«

(Ml

S





^
_
M



*

3



f

s



c*.

s


a

•%

a

m




|
1


c
3
S
m
* . —
'$




m*
>t
a
2

__,
3




M
C
^
1
3
J
i
r>
W
<
•
j
a
ac
*




w
c
'JE
1
I
*J
•a
c
5
a
•c
e
S
A-S
-------


/OLATIUC5

."?
m
Q
•2.
_)
O
P
*^
_l
0
f-
a:
^
a.
6
<
i-
<
n
JITOIUNG
g
*.
0
_.,
u
J
.—
ri
2
»£
*-•
f-
«^
2
•£
U
LO
j
_j
M"
5
_i
*^
>
D
S
^1
5
7:
O
to
as
<;
,*
o
u
-T
_J
a
•^
i-

DC
H i« *"*

*»* ^ 3 *
»- ^ ""
i
[ ' . "
Ji3j5

n -a | _
*".' ^ o •*
"• 2. 6 •£
£
^ "~ 1 ~
, f
£ 2 I £
tt
.s^ll
*~ <
esh
™ -3 c
7 !? 1 g
0 ^_
r— 	 "* 	 ' 	 "
fr-
K

[
*",* ^C Q M
p vi ^6 %-
§1h
H K % ~
i.1 1 Jr
S |||
a

o

o
5}


S


z
D
O
O
»
o
o



d
o
1
o

o

0



o


2
=
3
o
o
o

-,

-
s
1 Accnaphihvlfne
O

O

0
.,


8


*
0
a
=
=?

-,

o
o
l| Aceniphihene
P-I

2
„

_





X
o
3
o
0
•a'



-
0
V
c
i
a

o
M
„

„





<•
O
3
o
a
«



i
VI
c
1
5
i
0

5
o

^





.2
o
s
o
o
-



s
2
1
-,

o


3





*
O
5
o
o
i



r*
r*
O
w
c
•s
5
a
-

3
*







X
o
i
o
o
s



«,
n
|
-

-


=•





5
0
3
3
H!



3
2
I


3








^
O
0
a
O
«



0
•t
rt
r
c
^
6
3

-J


*•





?.
O
O
o
0
c*



*
s
>u>ijiircm«Ll(q>>Tu>fi ||
a

S


V





2
0
i
o
i



^
r
|
=

=








y.
o
o
a
a
•3



3
2
I
a

"'


»





$.
O
S
0
o
-



5
I
C
™
«
?
•3
^
-

3


^





2
=
3
=
«



rt
*
|
•cr

5


n





*
°
5
a
r-



^
S
c
u
__
L
c
                                                      a c !5
                                                      = -2  C
                                                        "
                                                      "_ -n /.
A-9
-------
1
u
c
O

•3
_.
,3
O
7
D
g
P
-j
D
O



O
<
0
z
n
t-
7
O
2
C
t


Z
c
7-

U
J
D
<
u}
Ci
>_' ^
O
O
8
7
£

*Br-
h» K "*
K



fr
2E-?
ac

*"* VI \ ""*
*•*• ^ b *



** 5

£ 5 I £

as|a
£ C. c *—
"*


fr
«i! 2 5 £
K

•i M 8 £

oc
., E n
li u 1 a
. **



**,'»- S w
t 5* * -^


™
w tt
5 ^ *
sill
4r| "1 Vi X!

O




O






**
- -53-



o
_



a






Q


S


S



£
«_*
dC
X

s




O

r-




ft
'• — Q"



8




e






Z


c-


£



<
•i
w

-




O







„"



O
~



•1






-


"


a



f



is ^
J*



2




3






«•


cs





e:
S
6
X,
4

2




•»

0
**"



-
s



D


	 r








*#


^,





G
E
4C
a

                                         S (8 v
                                         "2 S ?

                                         i'it
                                         — "S X
A-10
-------








TORIES
u
(J
a
fi£
a
<
O
O
ai

LJ
es










5 ^> ^
sis*
X _S "
S = _
a J-g t*
x | ".
M
*B 3 -»
Q >*C
< 2 — ^
X C Pi
III6"
3 -° ->
i". ae 5
O-jS1"
X P "*

Ml*
Xff -
" -5 ^
iil-
x f •»
T 1^
Ha**
0 rf -,
^" 2 *5 *
XC'
INI
d | S -,
5 S
c. «
$ w5 S (< *~ rl


S -5 ?
X H '"'
s.*i*
x *™ S
Q "
*. ,_
*C ~*



C
KM
O
a

S

0-

0


S


V


Ch

Q




5


O


a
—


o

try

r.
^



i
j.
3
A

•S

_




S


-•


r-

r-i




O


-


o



o



fW,
^




W*l
TI
"5
£

^

f*




-


«


*«

S




?»


~


S







o
i-*



1
c
1
'A

^

«

O


•


*r


=

5




7


-


~







=
6


^-
e
i
|
••'•

"

S




C


SJ


(nt.

VI




5


^


r-I





**%

I-.J
C-


C
w
S
^
•Q
rl

F-

m




=


If.


0

S




S


3


a



D

0

(Ml
*n



•5

I
«*
H*






CO
el
O
U
(U
LU
f~
<
o
C£
ci
3
uu
_1

<
O
5
7
f-
f-
_l
3
H-
fV
c.
U
2
O
O
UJ
CO









U
*!§,
^ il "f
U.
d!
a «->.
,7 ^ 5 -,
*"2a
^ § ^
ii 12 5 ^
UL *^

|i..
— * £; «i
'** li 5
H p
*
s M 5
fc •- 5 **
H *"
•«A ^

!?!•
= ^5,

= «g^

ill.
K E a

0 * S

i- K 5

^, x ^ **
1- V- ft
-IS-,
P f c
I-i






M
i1
**
£




a


C



D




*



*


0

~



3


S
o
-
2





I
f*
*




-

o
"**



-ft




••



a


=,

g



^


a
5
=
*^»





-3
i
™
-




^


^



^




•*



"


-

c



S


S
M
O
^




^
i
/.
S




S






M*



^
**



S


s

3



S


S
3
=
i




?
f
f.
3




^


•»



«




•o



I-
„

S

3



3


3
£
r!
f



C
^
Jr
J O-Tribioii
"
c




g


""





'






"


1m

=



Shi


S
S
F"»
r




^
4



































w u
i ** y
- j, _
i - j
2 J i
8 i *
. * •*
? i » -
a I - t
'15^3
•! - a S *
e "E £ 55 S
J j 2 n Si
S 3 < C ^
U r* i • £i
^ ^ j» ^^ S
*** K C 3 **
£ in. r- LT i-
A-11
-------
       TAQLE A-?.  COMPARISON OF FULL SCAN AND SELECTED ION MONITORING ANALYSES OF PARTICIPATE PHASE SAMPLES
Saftiftlc N'ime
Simple Tjf<
MctbuJ (rf Anil) vil
AiVlfjtcl
NsphUuftfl*
Atcnt
Ornic{l)nuofanthen<.
DtnfC<»}!>ffcnE
lrulrnc<}.?,j «,(Jj|!)ftftt
Di hen tcO.hJinihi seen*
Den( p<|,h,ijpcr|lcne
SIM
I-QL
l|'[!
00}
DOS
DOS
UUi
OU5
IKJJ
UOJ
005
1103
UOJ
UUi
DIM
UOS
Uili
not
COS
IS
IX3L
f!.I>
1
1
I
,
1
1
,
1
I
.
i
I
1
I
1
1
TF-J ,
Tdht
SIM
CM)
03
.-


001
DOT
0.91
OiJ
001
00]

dirt
001
001
00}
OUj
TF 4
lhk»
n
(l«f>








.,







TF.J
IMft
SIM
iwi
0,11

..
ous
].«
0.)6
J.J
3,«
I.Ti
),«

i.TI
O.JJ
0.2}
0 JJ
0.36
TF.J
tkid
rs
t«»
,.
„

..
1.1
..

«
-.

.-
-.
••


••
TF.IO
T1.i« '
SIM
«1-{I
0.11
..

„
0!
0.1] ,
1 Jl
1.11
»
J.W
..
I.)J
1,-H
U.IJ
01
U.I&
• TT.itf
Thi*
FS
Ij-tl |
.. I'
'
..
..

i
..
• „
«



-•

••

TF-M
l'J
„

-



..
-.

-

..

-.

-
tr-ii
l:i(U UIV
l!$
(nsl



..


..




-.

..
..

1I;.1J
Thin
SIM
 muiu
SfM  • Selctfftf idn niunHekifi| utufll
Thift « AClO hoi-mi* withoue rubber, thick l
Thin • ACIO hal'DHt teiihuut rulbcf. Eliin li^
Thtft Kub • AC'iU hiit'itwt x-ith iwbW*. il'*n
TirU 111! » 1'iciJ tl>"l
l\h, 1111 < I 1,,-iM, biic.t
      JjIf.lcJ i) !(>< I'OL
-------

•3
U
-3
a
u
O








:
J








o
o



o


1
c
1
c
V



•'













0






s
11 PlutMefte |



3
o






.
S
o


o

~
5

"""

o


o
3
e
c



—










O


3



o


o
| Anthf jccrve



S
a


2

1


5
3


O

w
s

"^

-


s
V
C
|
C



o


S

3


3


°

"
x

T

"


=
c
i.






!

•


'•


2


-



°


B
a



S
a



'•



-


s


"•



"


5
o
c
U



S
a













-






S
0
J



0
s



•'



:


6









S
o
|



=







:


S


•a






O
a
V
&
C



O







i


a


o



o


o
o
|| lnJtnc
-------
                                TABLE A-S.  CONTINUOUS  EMISSION  MONITOR CALIBRATIONS
Tea Dale
1/3 tni
yjrtj
xnm
\ I/! «/•>.!
IfZW*
*nm
j/urt)
tmm
mm
- - - w*,--
Tc\t Condition.*
AC 10
ACIOTKin
ilul Dlint
ACIQ Ttim
AC ID Thin
ACJQttuBhcr Thin
Hui Dlir.1
AOOHUfabcf Thin >
llui Dljnk
^ACiiVRubbcrTkin
0.
T-JV
m-
w
rvr
nr
r/r
rir
r/r
F/P>"
-«••''
CO
F/T1
i-vr4
r/r'
r/i*
r/i-
IVF':
nr
r/N.O."
!•/»•»
r/r
NO
i'.r-
r.r
IW
iV
r/i:'°
FIT"
W"
F/F"
P/T:JI
" M-*'
TMC
rvr1
x.o.
NO,
F/l-5.
M-"
M*
r/r11
F/i«u
cm-
r/i'3
CO,.
iw
r/r
r/r
ivi*
FIV
M>
r/i-
w
p/i*
)V|>
so.
)•/!•
I«/T
IVI'
M'
tvr
r/r
FIT
r/?
I'/T
M*
  N,0, » Inmmenl nw opcijbli
  QcToic
  Before nit, 11 Df iniuiinicnl full Kile on m'al'lnfe (li 
  Dcfo» on 0n< mutrjnjt [j| IK] lo» or /ull Kile '6" M the txNf
  Detail it, i. iniuuiixni >»il 1.15 of full Kjit IQM on both mirjunce jj«c».
  flc/ofc KM. iniinwivm 'ad 2.21  of full ictte low M one mii)i>n[e jyi inj (.JO- of full v^U l». CM iKe oiK
  Ucfott leu, inuiun l>i  of full irale lo- on flml/jnje jjt.
  U>clu>l >"jtui hi[h for one mid»u,jc £»>, IJ.J^- hud for the whtr nHilunf
 Inirntmtnf *»is i^iteticd  tc a narrower opcrjMnc linpe priqr lo caE>ttrtti*n,  Dcfoic «M, intir»eni i
 intirvment fejj 281> higher ln»n actual conccnir^lion for the  Ufl»e 5*.i.
 0>in£ different iniminieru (w ihii itii,  Otfoit >eil. iniirunienl reji) 11 of full vitr hick fo* am  midranee jjj inj II J1 hlt;^ for ine oihtr.
 On pmcii jtncjnty eheek. eme midran^e ifun [ai read ^ S'r af fuil tfalc:  iow. *»hde  IAC oiSer mt^r»nt;c e;ai fcaU 0t= Cu-
 Defott ««,  nummcnl reij J* of full Kile lo»  on one midranjt CM ind 0.7"! lo— on olhcr rn.dn.njc jn.
 U|.runuon h,fh on nvidranfs cj* Jnd 2^^ of
 KUul CtH^tntJIlion Wjn  (or Uf^ixt nnjt f »•
 Before ini,  in leeond, iiul naf((y tijull ii l»ie fonrmlraiion of J IhuJ jj».
 Before i»,i,  Iniu^n^ni reaif I,J* e>f full Kale hijh on O"< mUrinje jai «TU) OJ"*- hrch ew lh< other.
 Re/ore tell, iniimnir.ni reiJ 91 of  full wale Ki(h on mijfanjt jai  After leu. in»lrvrneni «ae)  I Ju* of jciual ton«nifjiii>n (ue; n for oiUuntt (}v jr.J j;"i of i,-nut
eoneentnuejn tvith Cw ufiper r»n(e  [i(,
 Defore le»l, miirvnieni (cad J* of full Kjlt hif h on one wiiirln^c c« anj S.!1* n.jlv ™ ennet  mSduBje  j»i
 Before ml, inllruniervl ,(aj ; SI of full Ulli  Injh on ani mijrjnft £ji jnj J.^5. n.th on the ollwr,
 Before UK. uiurunieni teaj J* sith on midtajife, jn, ,\t«» lew, iMinnncM reaJ llrt of xrual ron
-------
         APPENDIX B




SUPPORTING TABLES AND FIGURES
            B-l
-------
                              TABLE a-i, TARGETED VOLATILE ORAGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS-AGIO THIN AND THICK AIR CONCENTRATIONS
Simple !O
Simple T^pe
CyltcrUofl DJIC PQL
Cocnpowiscf* ng^t.
OicbfofGclilluorormlhue
CMarimKtfane
J-Mslhyfjiropent
Vinrl Chloride
BienxMTKthiiw
CHtooclhine
TficfelofOfiuorofnethafle
U DicMufGeihtfse
Carbon Duuirnlc
lodomelhjfle
Art loniinie
sjMj-l.2-DifhIar«{l*ne
2-MfAy!-J-flofMO\
U-DicMoiaclham
Vmj-l Arduit
Chloroform
l.l.l-Trichloioeiha/ic
Cuban TfincMoriJt
Dcfttfftc
12-DicMorKihut
f1ycw&b«fl£f ne
l-Oil«0.2-M
-------
      TADLE B-l.  TARGETED VOLATILE ORACANIC COMPOUND RESULTS-AGIO THIN AND THICK AIR CONCENTRATIONS (coniinued)
Simple ID
Sunple Type
CoUecHon Dale
Conipognj'
lJ.DmieibyI-3.!(«UDc
1 (rpune
Tiichloroethene
1 2-UicKlDiopfupuic
Ui^roiiMMnclhane
U-DioiiM
l)fOI»CiiHhlQm(f
„

"


„

,.
„
(JO1**1
16 I21*
TD-2J
Thin
OW»)
n|/L




-•
-.
-,
.,
,.
&«J"«
.-

..
-






I.W0*0
TQ-26
Thin
OM5/9J
nt/L
, «
..
..
«
..
„
..
,.
,.
1.I41*

..
•-
..
.,


-

I200"5
19UC*G
TD-27
Thin
OWW93
nt/L
..




..
.-
,.
,.
4.IU1*0
..
--
-.
-
••
»

,.

aou660
IJO1*0
TU-S
Thick
01/2 8J9J
HS/L
-.
,.

..
•-




Id US1
..
..

-

.,

,.


IJOo«
TB-6
Thick
mnim
nj/U
-.
..

--
-
-.
«
-.
..
&.VJE

..


'..
«
-



,_,u«c
TB-7
n.ifi
OI/7MJ
HS/L

-.


«
--
•-
-

69JE
.-


..



»
..

||UD«5
TU-13
nj uik
OUUH9J
«lfl.

..

-
-
..
..



..





..


.,

TO-2J
Rd Illl
OJ/IMJ
ng/U
..
-

~




.-
2Wt*c

.,


-.




I*/*0
6.K«*
TU-ZS
ru uik
OWJ/9J
n^L
-



..




3,lul>uu


.,








TU-8
nj nit
OI/1S/S)
ri^/U
..


-•

.,
..


2.10"^

..
..





.-


AVO
Thin
BgA.
-------
      TABLE B-l. TARGETED VOLATILE ORACANIC COMPOUND RESULTS--AC 10 THIN AND THICK AIR CONCENTRATIONS (concluded)
Simple ID
Simple Type
ColS«Lon Dait PQL
Compound* njA.
Nonine
o-X>lcnc
Siyicne
Dtcrmofonn
Cumciw
I.I,2.1-TcuacMof«ih«iW
1 ,2,3-TricMof opt opine
l.J Dkhlo(o-J Uuietit
PrnUirhloruc thine
1 .J-Dkhlorubc nicne
U-DirhluiabenjcM
U-Dichiofubcnunc
l,Z.Dib Compoundi Ire tuicil in icKniion limt aiikr
Thick « AGIO hex-mi* withoul nibber, thick li^er
Thin i AGIO hot-rnjl oiDioui mbbcr. Ihin Iijicr
nj Ulk < FiclJ bijflt
I^Qt • pT»*i^it qujntiution Imul
- • Not deiecud it the PQL and uihrVrs the conditponi for ftx?uiD(ei D and E
D • A'u conccnuiiion of ihij compouml in (hit ilmplc ii NOT {'tiifi thin Am lintel (JX) id it dip'i field blinl corvcncntion
E * Air conccnt/iiion of (hii compound in Mi ujnplt ii NOT ftoitr Hun [furr limei (3X) the t\eutc ruiliijr blink lir conccnuiiion
   JX itvr xcfi{r fit Id blint cunccnuiuon, •huluvtf ii (irltrr
G • CcxTipound ilcucicj 11 l
-------
                                     TAULE 13-2, TARGETED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS-ACIO WITH RUUUEH MR CONCENTRATIONS
Simple ID
Simple Type
Collwiion Date PQL
Compound" ng/L
DicMofcaliriiiQiCNtSG thane
Chtotamelhanc
2 Mclhytpfopeftc
Vinyl CWwiils
Uiom&n* shane
ChlorDdJiinc
TitchlwofluoronKihinc
1.1-DlchtwDtllicM
Cutwn Di.ulfidc
ItalcMlKlhuic
Amoniuile
tijni-tJ'Dkhlo*0ech«tt«
: Mcihyi 2 nufiuioi
l.hDichlorDcilunc
Vinjl ActUIc
Oiltvo/ain
IJ.I'Trichloroeihanc
(."ft/ban TcuacMuOtk
Denurw
1,2 Dichlorcteihine
nuarob*««en«
J.Oilwo-I'Mcihylprofune
5U
50
50
JO
50
50
5.0
SO
ill
50
JO
10
10
50
S.U
5.0
SO
SO
50
5.0
50
SO
TB-J4
Thin Hub
WOT/9)
"fA-



..






,.



7J1J



869



TD-J6
Thin Rub
(MiW/93
ng^L














)H) IJ

..
«
I3.JI



TO-35 '
Thin Rub
(W7SJ
n^/L



-

..
..




..
..
..
Ill J<.



11.10



TB-4]
Thin Rub
(W«7/?J
nfi/1
..



..
..
.-



..




-


">91


--
TD-JJ
Thin Rut)
IM/2TW
ntt



-.


-.



--
-




-

4|jD6


•-
TD.-IJ
Thin Rub
wmm
nj/L
„








--



-.




10.74
-
,.
..
TQ-5U
Thin Rub
QMJWJ
nE/L






«-

..



..
„


..
,.
i.if

..

TD-S1
Thin Rub
OSflJM)
nj/L




-





..
..
-
..
-
•-


UU8

..

TD-JJ
Thin Rub
mrum
niA,


-








-






J.I.E



TB.J7
Reid Hlk
CMBJffl)
n£/L

••
,.

.,

-






--
lUtl1*

-.


..

•-
TB-tti
ReU I) Ik
W/TWJ
nt/L


-


-.






-





..
.-


TB J]
Field Dfk
OS/14/V3
ng/L




,.
--












U7UE
..


AVERAGE
Thin Kub
ng/l.
<«800
<»400
«I(W
<*IUU
<«I JO
<*1.9O
<»t 10
<»t IU
<«I.5U
<»nu
c=IJ 10
<=O!(J
t = 4 (»l
tsl.WI
«.7I| W
•C'l W)
<«l 10
<«l W
 ih*t d*y*j fiitld b
£ * Ail concert if jiion of ihii toin(XXirvl in ihil uunjtlc it KOT |ieit*! ihin thite itrtiti ()X) the i^craje fiC!lit)f bl*jife ui rtxvf nUaiioA or
   JX the itrugc field bEjuni coocenlrjlicwi, twhicheter ri fieitci
-------
O
8

£
_
a
a

a:
O



I


a
CC
o
z

o
Z


o
livf

Q

u
<
-J
O


a
l£

fc
O
C£
a
ou
X c A
> 2 e
£\ 3 •& .j
e|p
33?.,
i a S >
^ *^
2a||
"If T t
_ i 5
sii*
III*
ill*
, i S
Mi*
-. » 5
Mi*
3 S ? «J

«i?
djp
sis
Ml*
^^
Siinpfe 10
5s«tpt«r Type
CellecitDfi Pale
Co
-------
O
8
X
u


i
a
K
Q
8
o

o
O


a
UJ
_)
ca
<
f! ^
<-
S5§ j
a 3 S f
•" - 3
• - 3
5 = e W
*- C 3
*iS*
K at ? _1
llli
a a? ,
•i at 5 
-------
                                      TA1JLK U-3.  TAUCCTED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS-FACILITY BLANKS Altt CONCENTRATIONS
Simple ID
Sample T^pc
Collrciiofl Due O99J)
Compound*
QurhUxoti^uofometiiane
OilorcxiKihvK
1 Mclhylpropcne
Vinyl Diloride
liiomonKlhjnc
Chlwoeihane
TmMoiortuwoitiethwe
l,|.D«M«orlht«e
Cubun DimlfiJe
foJcxrcihiJie
Ace ion krik
u ini - 1 .l-O'ichlof eertie ne
l-Mdh|ri-2-Pi0fian9t
t.i-DkhlaraeAue
Vmfl ActUlc
CMoeofomi
U.t-TrkhlixoeiJiine
Ci/tKm TtusrhlenJc
Dcnjrne
U-Oiehtaixihine
nuoroblp«>pjU7
=1^.







..
.-
-.
--
••
••
-
»

-.
~
166«
--
-

TO- Jib
W Ittk
D3AR
r»£/L
-
--



.,
.-
..
-.



.,

--



I.WOE

..

TU-4J
Fcl B!k
W«7
nj/L
-
-.


-•
--
-
.,
.-

••
--
•-
»
•:
-


IJJOE
„
••

TU-I9
Tup Ul
, UJ/ll
nt/L
i
^


!
1



1
r •-

--
-.
: "
--
,\ *.

't

-
«
i
--
• TD-it
JU Hit
Ul/11
Btft.
-
•-
..

-•




-

«


-.







TO.JI
I-U Oik
04/1 i ,
«SA-
.,
-•
-
..

--
..

.-



--
.-


-.




-•
TU.«
ild till
UJAT7
nfA-










..


,.








AVG
IV 1 Ulk
BJ/U
<;81X1
<^4UO
l 5D
•c«Z U
<«l TO
l dtlerlctl it ihc I'Ql. Itlil tatnfiet fl'C tMkJiettxil fw fuutnutcl D and t!
             D « Att ruiH.rnu*lj(Mi uf Uiii riMH|U«nJ in 0m lAttipfr ft NOT {rratei iftxA thir< iifi
             £ * Aii tokrtnuniori of ihi) comfHjvnd in Uih iimpte it NOT tinier  ihin thief iimcl (J.X) Uir n cnjc
                »»IH|e TtttJ blaik concenualiud. whichever ii jrtjltr
             G * C«n|VKinJ iMKKd 11 h» ihu I puctictl quunnjuon lirut tit S fi|A-
blut iif cocKenmnon or 3X ihc
-------
                          TABLE B-3,  TARGETED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS-FACILITY WLANKS AIR CONCENTRATIONS (continued)
Simple ID
Sample Type
Collcrtion Ditc UWJ) PQi
Compound" ngfL
35Om*lhyl-).|lfieoe
Heptane
tricnliwueihen*
1,2-DM.Mafapropjrw:
D'UiiMnmtcibinc
l.4"O»0»4/l«
DtamoJichloHMiKJune
cii-l.)-DicMocopfD(wne
4 Mcihyl 2 PrnunWK
Tuluene
irxjii- 1 .3-Dkhloiopcopcne
I.l.I-TrirnUnoeihiiK
TctrtchSixrxthene
DiomOJurcMne
2'l!c»»«*w«
DibfocitGChtotoiiKihjnt
UJ-Dibiomoeditnt
CltkMotwnicne
1, 1 .1 J'Tttm'tilMoeihan*
Eitijl Denunc
lit p Xjten£
Noninc
JU
5«
SU
so
50
51)
50
SO
i.O
50
50
30
51)
50
Jtl
JO
JO
5U
SO
10
SU
50
TU »
fcl Btk
oiAis
nfA.
..



-
,.
..
..
..
J|OKI:


«
„
,.




-
IW"1*

TD IS
Fcl Ulk
02/n
nj/L







..
.-
JIIM
..
--
--
..
.-



.-
-
]U)DO:
..
TU-14 '
I'd Dll
ozrii
nlrt.







..
..
ttu\*A
~

-







60JUE

TD-39
Pel Ulk
W/1J
ngA-


.-
-
-


.-
-.
4 t'J1*

,.
-

.-




--
17jM

TU.JB
Tel Ulk
ewu
njA.







'«""
--
61 20
.,







--
1J!DE
2S55

TO JO
Fcl Dlk
(M/tl
n|/L
„


-
..

,.
,.
•-
JI5ue
..
,.
-•


-•

.-

,.
J5»M
..
TB-JI
Fcl Oik
U5AJ1
nE/L
..
..

..

,.
-.
_
_
l.Wul
-.
..
••
..

--


-
•-
_

TD.-l&b
Ftl Ulk
USAJ7
d|A-




.,
..
..


i.w"E
-
..






•-

..
-
TD-41
RIBtk
us«?
n(/L
-

.-

..
~

..

,„«£
~
..
••
..
.,
..

••


,.
„
TB-19
Trip Bk
02/11
nj/l





-.



IU>>»*
-









17UB€C

TB-II
n Facility blank
HJ Dll « Field blink
Trip 01 * Trip dlink
•• * Not dtitckd ii ikt f'QL uvl iiihTiii ilu tcxuluiwii (or lootnoui 0 ind E
D • Air concenvilion «(ihil compound in (hit umple il NOT |ifiicr Ihw ihm UIT«I (IX) thu dajr'i field Mini conccnmtion
E a Au CDncrnvaticxi at (htl contpeund in U*n lljitplc il N'QT frcAlerthftA thlec Unwi OX) !>>« l»«n|C fwiiny bluik uf conccnuatioa of JX l
   ivcr](t Held blank ccHicnmuon. unkhcxi ii |>riict
G a Compound deirued ai icu ihin • pvaclical fjwaAtiLition limit cf S n|A«
-------
 2
 <
 8
•T
 Z

 -J
 fc
 3
 u
 O
 a:
 a
 O
 o
 z

 o
 5
 51!
 -t
 O

 i
 D
      i a •« 5
        f S § e^
           s
                                                B-10
                                                                                                  X

                                                                                                   S
                                                                                               II
                                                                                                 •* »*"i .j
                                                                                                 s si
,   J S 5
3 5,3 s o-
•5 -g2 o.'S

I**"5]

  sS i! £ u
                                                                                               IJ
                                                                                               ; i£^
-------
                                          TAHLE D-4.  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS-AGIO THIN AIK CONCENTRATIONS
Simple ID
Supple Type
Collection D«te P"QL
Conipouhd* "fi^L
€5 AlUnc
Cfi AlliBG
Cytfojflm* or branched illcne
Uutjuul
Cfi A 11 arc
Mlutenal
3-Methylfuran
J«0uien jE-oinc
CyclaslVt/w or branched alkcnr
Apparently UuUnaJI
CjnrlohMine
Unlnywn Chi or oc urban
PfnijniJ
LMIJto*n
>C4 AUrhj.lc
CB w 9 Allme
Acetic Acid
(Jnlrtywn
Net mil
5;|n*iw
Unlmjun
Unlno^n
s
3
i
}
3
i
5
5
J
5
S
j
J
5
t
5
5
3
I
5
]
]
TB-IO
Thin
02/US/9)
nJ/L

167
J69





..

„
..
H



..





TU.I!
Thin
OM»«)
nf/L
-.
133
J2I

..
..


..
..
-,

..
..





--


tlM!
Thin
OWJW3
nj/L

»

2">



..

..



..
••





-

TU.20
Thin
OKIWJ
n^A.



..

„




,.






,.




Ta.>!
Thin
U!/ib9J
nj/L
..
-•
U
_

-
-.

--
•-
-.
..
--
-,

.,

..
»L
..

-
TD.JI
TJiio
Ul/IE/9}
•.(A.

.-
Ill
-III


.-

,.
«

' .,
-.
..



--
-


-
TH 2J
TKin
02/1 JWJ
n^A.


.-



..










--

••


TH-26
Thin
OM5«J
10/1-
..
-
..
-.


..

,.
2O
,.


..


-.


»

..
TD-27
Thm
02/I5/9J
nt/L

-• ,







-.
-.

-•


..
-.


••


ru-ij
Rcli) Oil
UJ/IW)
"S/t,

,.






..

..











TB.JS
Field Oik
OM5WJ
KC/L
,.
W«L
5jiii.


..
..

-,



,.









AVt'dAGE
Thin
"fr^-
• <-JOO
<«17.«
«-95.78
JUU
<=5CO
<«50U
<»S»X)
<«667
«-JOO
<"1(W
<•=««
l
c.TUU
<«J(W

            i we Ifitcd in rtlrnliwn IMH« oiik-f
           ho* nil * **iihwi nibbef. iJhm by Air i"«ricenWaHIM of i^»* tiwiifpound in iliii i4JH[»]« ii KQT f»e*ter than ijuce time* (JXJ ihr i^\tt^g facihiy biinl ur cu«i:enwitiu*i m JX ihc iver
   HtSJ Llink conccnUjOun, ««hicHc^ci n gmtrr
-------
                                     TABLE B-4.  TENTATIVE VOLATiLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS-ACIO THIN AIR CONCENTRATIONS (concluded)
S«npt< ID
Simple Tj(x
Cc.llccuwi Ditc PQL
Compound* n|/L
K,N -dmietJ!} (aceumide
CHAIkue
Unlnown Keioftc
Ilenuldch^de
AppuenUf Trifncrtylbenirdf
O.Ur>ll
CIJ Altuc
Uninown
UnUiown
UftlftOwf*
Ct2or IJAIUrx
Unknown
Uii^nou>ft
tjftljwn
UBino*s
Triiktine
UnlflowfJ
TcinilcFuu
Unknown
S
J
5
J
3
i
J
5
i
i

s
5
J
J
5
i
5
5
TO- !0
TllMI
OMJMJ
njA.








..

-








TU-fl
TTiin
OMMSJ
ngA.
-,

-


--

..
..
•-

-.
--

..


•-

fD-IJ
Thin
02AJS/9J
mfL

-



-

..
..

..




-
-


TU-30
Thin
awvn
nf/\.
I7IL
,.


-
•-


,.

.-
..

--
.-

.-


TB.JI
Thin
OUitW
s^ft.
I47L
..



--
-

--
-•
~

JU
..
•-
-

•-

TU.I2
Thin
02/W9)
nt/L
(Hi1
..



-


-
-
-.

M
-


-
-
-
TB-1J
IMn
ovum
«{fl.










-
..

-
JIL
Jl"1-

-•
-•
TU 56
Thin i
02/1&9J ||
"t*- i;
',



.. •



'.
••
-
„
.-






TU.JJ
n>i»
OMJ*9)
r(A-
IH»L
.-
)7



-

-


11

..

an

u»

TU-J)
Fit lil Ulk
01/1 WJ
iitft.
JlltL


..

-



-•


•-
-.





TU IS
r,,u on
UMSWJ
"(A.
J4J111-


,-
-

••
.-
--
••
-




63«

IOJ"
49"
AVCKAGC
Ttim
«tn.
c.lJUJ-l
<>3UQ
«BS6
<=S(3U
<>SUU
<>jca
<-300
«-S,«J
<«5W
<>SUU
«S.OO
olUli
<•ll.il
•e-SOU
<.t J«
<-3I.JI
<=5UI
hirhc>(> U {tcilti
i n«ld bliM. conccnd^yon or live dctccucn !
{7 f»c!}i!y bitAk alt eEmc
-------
                                  TAULK U-5.  TKNTATIVIf VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS-AGIO THIN WITH RUUUliK AW CONC[£NTKAT1ONS
Simple ID
Sample Type
Cullfcuon I3jie PQL
n[rt.
C5 Alklnt
C6 All me
Cyrloalkinc or bunched ilkcne
Uutuial
C& Aillne
2 Buitnil
l-Mcthrlfurin
3 Dulcn 2 one
Cjclcuilint 01 brinchcj ilkciK
AppVCflLly BuLUllJ
Cjclohetine
UnLnomn Chlnccubon
PenuniJ
Unknown
>C-I Aldehyde
Ct or 9 Alkue
Acetic Acid
Unlno»n
Hciinil
Si^ov^nv
Untno^n
UnLnoon
5
5
5
J
5
S
S
}
1
3
5
1
5
J
5
J
J
J
5
5
5
J
TB-ll
Ihm Rub
(Wi77«3
"S'V-
-


..
-.
j,M
-


..
„

--

2J«
.-

-
27"

.
27"
TU-J4'
Thin Rub
W/27/iJJ
ng/L
-.


.

,jilL

il"






-



jjl.1.


••
1Q.J5
TMn Kub
wmm
fti\.







-.





..








TD-JU
Thin Rub
05/JJ/9J
nt/L

..
..
..
..
JJ
NltL
tl

-
4J
••

tl1"-
23L
..
-•

•I]
..
|4m.
•11
TD-Jl
Thin Rub
UtfHf)3
n^/l.

..

-
«
21
--
51
.-

..
J9


21

26

17
43

19
TU-5J
Thin Rub
OJ/2-WJ
nt/L




-

--
2ll
-.
•-
-.
••
»

I4)1L

,,10,

|(jJIL


,,HL
TU-J6J
fit Id LJIk
W/27/V3
nyV


-
-

Ijio,

31"
•-

•-



n"1-


|7IIL
23'"-


jjIQ.
TU-SJ
hcM Utk
OS/2Jfl3
n(A-




--


..

•-








.-
..


AVERAGE
1 hin Kub
filf\-
<=5UI
)UO
<>I7.17
«iSO
<»JJ 67
<>5UU
<-JUU
<«11 67
<-)067
<=Si»!
<=6I7
<>!« IT
967
eii(< hut blink. 111 conctnutuon « ]X ihc i«cii(t field
   bl^nk ecxvenuation. «hKhr%er it (rcAicr
                                                                                                                                                                                         fcununurd)
-------
                           TABLE B-5.  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS-AGIO THIN WITH RUBBER AIR CONCENTRATIONS (concluded)
Simple ID
Sample Type
Collection Dan PQL
»tA-
KN.diiiKlhj-lictumrilc
CII Afkut
Unknown Kelonc
iliauMehyde
Appweniljr TnnieihjFlberifcene
Ocunil
CI2 Allure
Unkno* n
UnlnooR
Unknown
C\l or H A IV me
UfAnown
Unlnown
Unlnow/i
Ui*lnu*n
Tridcc»ne
Unlno*n
Tc!?a
79
70
J'>L

TB-5J
Thin Rub >
UJ/2-IW
njfl.
iwJ-

7»R. ,
-.

t*1 r
,«i
!'
2^"-
JJ1
-.

-
20
,,!«.
,ML
,ill
J4«-

TU-J6t
FidJ Blk
W/27/9J
ngA.
MM1"-

)4I1L


20"L



jjtlL
..
-»

-.
ll"«-



_.5 '" •V."--^-"r- im5: : : : Crt :""L^-»--LL-"-
TB-$]
Field Blk
U5/3-IWJ
n(/L

--





-.
19*

.,
..




*

-•
AVERAGE
TWii Rut.
f!J/L
<.7}883
< = 500
^-11 17
<«9.I7
<»5.UO
<«:6«j
««J.4t
<*&))
<«I3U)
<=]J U
<«S(»
<«JOO
«JOU
<=U.8J
<»[-! (rJ
<>n w
<«I6J)
-; = !(8J
<»SU)
I % Ccxnpoafeh ut InuJ tn rfUniion tintf older
Thin Rub = ACIO hoi.mit wiih rubber, thin liycf
R Not ifeieciril n Lhq I'QL UK! iiiitflci iHe ronditioAi for foouioici II ml L
11 m Aw roncenunion of ihii cooipounj in ifcii tiniplc ii NOT (ceiirt AM !h»« limrj jJX) ihw Uj/'i field bUik coofrnujlion or UK dtwruon !m>H
L = Air cancrnuiiion of Ah contpovnJ in ihii umpk it NOT jirjicr ihin ihic* unnri (JXJ the Ktrjjc hui blucri|e
   blink emxtnumoK, wKicheter i« {inter
-------
                                 TABLE 0-6, TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC CQMPGUNDS.-FACiUTy BLANK AIR CONCENTRATIONS
Suliple 10
Sample Tyf*
Colin lion OJW 1-QL
Compound* ti£/L
CJ AH vie
C6 Alkjnt
CycIoilkxAC o< branched alkene
Uuunal
Ci Atklltt
1-UuituI
2-Methyl/urj/i
3-Oulen«3-oiw
Cjriwlkane or branched alkrne
ApfJJtnllf Uullfljl
C)ctohe««ne
Unknown CMnucaibun
Pcnunil
Unlf>0* fi
>CJ AUeMc
CJ W 9 Alluic
Arelie Acid
UnlnoiftR
ileXAJiil
SilOtlTK
UofcltO*R
Uninown
J
S
5
S
5
i
i
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
J
5
5
5
J
5
J
5
TB 15
t'wiliiy Ult
U2/1 1«J
«t/L

61
1)6




-






..

-.
-
--

--
-
TD-16 '
IV-ililr II Ik
uyiwj
»S/L







..


.-

--









TU-39
i-Kility U!k
UJ/tJflJ
ngA-



-

-


..


-




-



-•
-
TD.J8
ficlhtf Ulk
«J/)JiVJ
ajrt.
J5





.-
-.
.-



-
..

JJ
•-





TIMO
Fjcilil, Ulk
owu/vj
n{A.

-
-

••
-,
»
•*


--

-
"

--
..
..
••



TB«
r«cilily Ulk
oM)im
rt^/i.

--


-
..
-





•-




--




Til-Jab
I'xthly Utk
oswm
ng/L


..

-





«
-
••


•-




-

TB-47
I:K-iliiy Ulk
U3«M>J
nj/t-






-





••
--

•-•





••
TU-41
Tic Id Ulk
W/I5W
R{/L


..

•-

--
.-

•-


-.


-

--
.-



AVERAGE
r-Kililf Ulk
ngA.
<=II.IS
<=>I20U
«II,J»
<=!00
<=500
<.SOQ
<.5OJ
<-5«l
<»JOU
<>SCX)
«5UI
«5Ufl
«SU(I
<>5KJ
<=5UI
<:=9?J
olUU
 blink
 IdBU »ricUMint
- • NCH demteij tt ihc PQL anJ uiiifK) ihc condMioni Tor fcxxnoui II ind L
HQL < Prif licit ijuuiinnon tiinil
-------
                                     TABLE B-6.  TENTATIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS-FACILITY BLANK AIR CONCENTRATIONS (concluded)
Simple ID
5zinp!e Type
CoHcciioft DIM PQL
Compound* nffl.
N,N-dinKtlijIiceuniiiie
CIt AlUne
Unknown Kelone
[IcRx^Mchydc
AppJJcniljr TrinKS-hjIbcnune
Ck-cuii)
CI2 AlliiK
Unknown
Ufll«O*B
UnUiQwn
CI2 or IJ AHane
Ual/io« o
Unknown
Unknown
Ufll nown
Tl'Jecine
Unknown
Trlr«J«)«
Unbiows
1
5
5
5
3
S
5
5
i
5
5
5
5
5
j
S
5
5
3
1U 13
Fxiltty Qlk
U2/11SJ
of/t.

,-
..



.-


--
..

-.
.-




-
T1I-I& '
rvitity Otk
mum
atfl-









--


-
.,
--

«


TU-JO
Fxilitr Ulk
04/1 SflJ
fifrt.
W211L



-



48IIL
4J1-






-

-
TU.JJ
T-xAaf B!k
04/Hfl)
nt/l
JW111
71
..

2J

11



30








i •• 	 in 	 •• — -.
TD-W
Pjciliiy Dlk
CM/ISA}
ng/L
1JI?"1-


..
--

-.

..
3T1-
»


-.
..

.-

--
TU-JI
Factliix Oik
OJA)J«1
ftpt
7651-
,.



,4IIL
••

I91-
1SL






.-

••
TD-4t!l
Fvihtr Oil
OJAJ7/91
B(/L
7Wl
..
;-
],
-';
utu.
-.
-'.
^
I31-
-
--



-.

«_

TU-J7
Ficiti!) Ult ,
(M/UWW
ng4-
IZJL

-.
.,




J4L
S*1









TU-Jt
KuM Llk
OWIWJ
Bjrt,
I!12ML
••

•-




J91«.






-.


••
AVERAGI-
r«.-iirir ait
nj/L
<«4)3 2i
<-u.2i
<«$(*>
N SU
<.JOO
<-!9,SJ
<«3tJS
<>l 1}
<-5UU
<=5UJ
<»500
<-i(W
<=5tW
<«5tW
<*suu
<»JOO
to
     t • Cunpoundt a/c lilted in rctcniiod litite order
     Fkrilup Oik » Ftcility blmt
     RrM Ulk » Ticld blink
     I'QL  s Pr^L'ticiJ qyvtltUEipn limit
.. . No) (Icttcitd II (he I'QL ind TJiiifin (he conjittcmi loi fooljiwtl II ind L
II » Air eoaccnlfatkxi of ihll compowftU i« shij ivupl* it NOT {rcjtvr thin fh/« unici f3X} ih*l dty't Ttrld bfuik conecnuauon ot ihc delff^n-n torut
L B Air corccntmign uf shit cori^xjunU m thn finipte i» KOT £t?3!rt fhlA thjfe Unvt t3X) 
-------
2
Si
a
u:

<
£
O

U
D
2

O


O
u
u
2

o
c:
O
u
d

£3
<
U! "f
0 "2
< 5
c"
i 1 l-l
*"• o g1
c
MB
°§
" j 3-?
c
2 ll-C
3k
•S C S '*
oiE^e
•" S £
0 5

1 * S't
°l
-,-S

°i
*" c
1 1 1'fe
H °l
e
r*l "S
° e ££ E
°5

S1!
i Simple ID
Simple Type
CoHcciacMi Ojt«
Coftipjund'
2
3
V

"3
9
v

2
V
.4
"3
3
V

"3
3

d
3
a

d
3
st
v

S


"3
V
d
9"
V


1
u
•T
V

~3
*

3
=3
V
_J
"3
3
V

~3
S

d
3
3


3
S
V
J
3
a




s



1 C6 Allwie 1
*•»
o
>o
V

~3
V

3
V
3
S
V

o*

i


3
S
V

3
a


s

Zi



|| Cj-cloaJkir** or branched ilLene 1
00
"O
i


3
V

3
s
v
d
3
S
¥

8
•D

d
3
3


3
S
V

M


"3
s
V
3
"


a
3
3


3
S
V

3
S

1

3
S

ri
3
3


3
a
«

3
2


3
a
v
"3
V


1
s


"3
s
V

3
S

s
V
_J
3
S

d
"3.


3
S

d
3
S


3
S
s
s!
"3
S
V


•a
c
a
ffi
3
3


3
3
V

3
3

"3
3
V

3
S

\
3'


3

_J
3
3

d
3
55
V
=3
S
V


a
S


3

d
3
S

"3
s
¥

3

3
5?


S

-4
3
S

5
S!
V
S
V


Hi*
e
a
o
2
3

-i
"3
S
V
J
3
3

id
=3
3
V

3
S

d
2
S


2
3

^
2
S

4
3
3

3



1
g
|
u
ao
3


3
3


*•*
-T

d
"3
V

3

"3
3


3
a

j
3
I'

rf
2
3

3



1
J
1

d
2
3

•i
3
3

d
3
s
V

3
S

2

J
2
5?

^
3
S

it
3
S

'3
S



5
i
"S.
u
3
3

^
3
S

-i
2
S

d
V
d
2
3
V

^
S

d
3

_,
3
s

_,
2
5?

%
S



|
1
e
J
o
D
f-
s

^
3

ri
3
3

_r
"z
3
V
_j
3
3
V

.J
3

rf
3
S

_j
3
S

w
3
S

2



II Pcniuial
3
S
it


3
S

J
2

d
3
3
V
_,
3
V

sT
"3
3

d
3
5

j
3
s

_,
3
S

"3
3



|| Unknown
3
5

_,
3
3

j
3
3

"3
3
V
r>
3
1

"3
I

j
3

w
3
3

^
3
S

S



|
3
3

_,
3
3

rf
2
S

3
3
V
d
3
V

~3
i;

d
3
3

rf
2
S

d
2
S

"3
S



•I
S
a
u
3
5

sJ
3

^
vi
3

si
~3
V
J
2
*

S3
3

d
3
3

j
3
S

j
3
3

=3
S
•


s
.s
3
3

r?
3




%
3
V
J
S
V

~z
3

d
3

_,
3

j
3
S

3
3



c
I
c
S

d
3
3

j
3
S

3
S
¥
d
S
V

*
•B
C-

d
3
3

j
S

j
2
S

j



(i llc.inj)
3
3

d
3
1

j
3
S

%
3
V
d
3

_J
"3
S
¥

d
3
3

j
S

j
2
3

*>
"3
3



|| S tic i me
3
3
u

.,
S

-
I

3
3
V
d
3
V

d
"3
I

S?
3
S

c-
s

d
3
S

Is
s



c
3
3
H

J
3

if
3

d
3
3
¥
d
3

d
3
1

j
3
1

d
s

d
3
3

3
'S



C
*
1
D
ag

d
*

„
S

"3
S
V
-4,
-r

S

•i.
•9

«,
1

j
2
S

"3
3



J
                                                                           411
                                                                           s |
                                                                           c S
                                                                           I if
                                                                           * D
                                                                           3 w
                                                                           E a

                                                                           Si
                                                                           'S '5

                                                                           K 8




                                                                           II
                                                                            W v
                                                                            If
                                                                            S a -
                                                                            - - a

                                                                            II i.
                                                                            •- .£ ,s
                                                                            •?"i't

                                                                            III
                                                                            S SI

                                                                            U i
                                                                            •So I
                                                                            I i S
                                                                            ill
                                                                            •3 I
                                                                            s ?

                                                                            II

                                                                            1 5
                                                                            = '•
                                                                             e
                                                                            111
                                                                            1!
                                    B-I?
-------
O
p
H

£

01
LJ

2

D
Z
O
u
o
_
<
9
5
w

P
<

g
u
u
1 	 T
irj e
S « 1
> *
e
« ,s I •
fj£||
?*l|
" „ I
W\
—
R e g fi
K
s .«= g f
* 2 ******
°"
1 _ ;; •§

' 3.
I
1 *?
2J c fill 1*
r = S "1
*
IS*
*-v "P

O s£

El?
Simple ID
Simple Type
Collection Dwt
Compound*
3
S


1
d
~3
S
V
rf
Z

~3

5?
V
«*
3
3


Z
S
V
i
S
V

3
a



|
U
I**.


•e
i
3
S
V
=1
3
3
V
_l
3
3
V


V

3
3

H1
3
3
V
3
S
V

3
i



Unknown Kimne
	
3


3
3
s!
~3
3
V
_.
3
V

3
1
si
"3
3

d
3

•
3
S
V
sf
3


3
3



1
3
3


3
3
V
ri
3
1
d
3
1

V

3
S

d
3
3

^
3
3
V
3
3


3
3



I A|n«icnll)» TfilwthjrlbtnMrn 1
3
S

ri
3
f
d
"a
s
V
^
?

1
e?
3
3

*
3

*J
3
1
c!
"3
3


"3



g
3
S


3
3
V
"i
i
ri
3
1

~3
8
V

3
3

ri
3
S

ri
3
V
1

r!
3
S



I
u
3
S

	 (
4
3
3
V
d
Z
S
V
_
3
S
V
^
3
i


3

•I
3
g
V
d
"3
S


3
S



| Untnown ;
3
3

,
3
V
5
1
V
a
1
.,
~3
§
V
_
3


3
S

J
3
1
i

d
3
S



i
3
i
3

_,
3
1
~3
3
d
3
3
•J
1
^
3
S

d
. 3
3

_l
3
*3

j
1



| UrAnu.n
3

*J
3
V
t
3
3
V
¥
3
rf
3
S
V

3
f

d
3
3

ri
3
S
V
S

d
3



35
o
o
K


4
3
f
j
3
V
si
3
S
V
__,
3
3

a
3
S

_,
3
1
1

j
3
S



BE
J
a

j
3
V
3
3
V
d
2
3

I

?

ri
2
f

_,
3
1
al
8

_,
3
S



C
e
c
3
3
&

j
3
3
V
3
S
V
d
3
¥
H
3
S
w
_,
3
3

e!
3
3

ml
3
3
V
3
S

d
3
S



1
o
f*
fN

S>
3
1
"3
-i,
F.
d
3
i
_,
3
S

ri
3

H
A
"3
3

rf
3
9



1
»*


g
3
S
V
j
f
j
3
3
sf
3
3

rf
3
1

»J
3
¥
"3
i

d
i



i!
3
1

_,
3
S
V
"3
3
V
j
3
3
¥
=!
3
S
V
_,
3
3

d
2
3

.1
3
S
V
~3
S

_,
3
3



Unknown


^
«b
,j
3
V
J
3
S
V
d
3
f
_,
3
S

d
2
1

.,
S
V
sf
"3
S

d
3
S



|
3
s

j
3
1
"3
1
ri
"3
3
V
s!
2,
3
_,
3
1

ri
3
1

_(
3
1
"3

s!
3
3



|
                                                                   il
                                                                   •s I
                                                                   a t.
                                                                   I'9
                                                                   If
                                                                    I
                                                                  i v
                                                                  jl
                                                                  li
                                                                  II
                                                                  mS "
                                                                  n,
                                                                  s «* w
                                                                  •sla,
                                                                  5 e *•
                                                                  |i'«

                                                                  IP
                                                                  I !l
                                                                  11 i
                                                                  »» 5

                                                                  III
                                                                  IP
                                                                  S *3
                                                                  -S ,!: 2
                                                                  ::«
                                                                  s ^
                                                                   II

                                                                   IJ
                                                                   s * a
                                B-18
-------
                                                                                                                     I

                                                                                                                     1
 o
 Q

 Ui
 c:
 ui
e

U
Q



O
U
y

z
«t
D
c:
o
O
LJ
aa

U

a
<
ll i
>* s
_
•"• 3 3 ?
* -, -I
-, at !j «~
5 -I S '-

c
f- *•* u
' A
r
tc
*" £ 3 ^
|

! *~ jj 3 ^

•s
*H|

||
tl.
o ,T § 1
111 1
I43u
s
V

"3
s
V

1


s
V

*3
a


"3
s
V
~l
"3
s
V


1
u
3
S

J
3
3
V

"3
S


s
tf

3
S

_J
3


"3
S
V



•M!
3


S
V
s$
3
S

d
"3
1

3,
S

si
3
S


s
V


u
w
•3
t
I
5
5
™
3
S


3
1
J
3
3

-1
"s
S
V

3
S


3
S


~3
S
V



1
ffl



s
V

3
8


2
i

3
S

T*
3


2
1



5
S

d
Z
s
V

I


i
j
4.


_
i






a
na
w


3
S
V

1

d
i

1


3
S


f


j
| 2-Mclb;
n


•f
P*»

g


*"*
S
si
3
8


*B


Z
1


tf
e
a
3
ffi
3
S

d
2
S
¥

I

d
2
ri
3

ri
3
s

d
3
I


"
tint or trtirichni jjkew
i
5
3
3

d
3
3

3
f

d
3
1

3


3


3
S
V


1
m

s
«r


3
1

2




3

si
3
S

si
3
f


I
K
*
U
R

rf
3



j
3
1
T«
3
i


3
S


3
S
V


1
1
c
3
3
S


2
3
V
rf
3
3
V

d
3
3-
V
fj
3
f

«t
3
3

wl
2
f



1
1
r-

rf
3
f
d
3
S
V

d
5

3
S
V

w
3
S

rf
3
S
V


e
o
•S
1
i

rf
i
§

3

^
I

1

5
S


Jl
M)


•S
1
A
S

™*
2
S
V
J
1

_,
3
S
V
d
3
I,


3
3

id
3
S
V


1
U
r-

_j
i



5?
3
S
¥

3
S
V

_,
3
S

d
3
3
V


'=
.a
£
3

^
S
V
H
3
S
V

.j
3,
d
3
S
V

r)
3
i

4
3
f


e
1
i--i

.,
*-t




5
t!
«

if
X


5'



1
*t

d
1

5

a)
Z
1
d
as
f

ri
3
S

«!
3



^0
irt


ri
3
V
d
3
S
V

ri
ri

3
S
V

rf
1

si
3
1



|


d
S

«*«


i
¥
s
V

X
3
S


S


c
i
o
I


^
i




•**
—
1

d
s

™
•?


"G
J
2
                                                         B-I9
-------
O
„


in
o
5
O
U
CJ

z

U
O
ill
> .- 5
Mi'|
—
E s i'i
a.
7
IJch
*~ S = o
~
1 1 |-I
"3
-------
O
tu

Q
UJ
a
X
2

O
CL
2
<
D
a:
O

u
O


UJ
u
f-
U!
_l

CD
u 3 'g
3 * -.

-«v
r- Q ^ "e
ifri
-=

                                           B-21
-------
I/)



O
Q


P
z
S-
CO
n




1


O
o

y



1
o
I
z
u - ,1
US ?
51 5
P = s'j
•£•
s m S j=
"- jj o g
« e
21 Q A E
£3g
- S
SM
£. ^
*Pi
* -> f

ael
„ u
^fli


sf$
ii.
a *• E "9
« ^ I i
1 1 U I§
S

"3
s
V

"3
s
V
d
~3
1
d
3
R
V

1

S
V

3
S


"3
3



U
sS
G
3
S

3
S
V

2
3
"3
f
3
S?


1
_J
1
d
3
S


3
S



|
*
e
3
f

"3

*3
1
d
"3
S
V
"3
s


a
V
d
3

"3
S


s
3
S




!


d
3

1
^
3
1
3
S


K

3
f

3
S


3
s



w
e
e
"A
U
1
r^

"3
3
V

4
^
S
=3


3
S
V
r1
3
f

3
S


3
S




t Ocunil
3
V
\
1

S
V
d
3
«
d
3


5

3
S
V
d
3
3


3
3




U
3
5

d
"3
3
V

3
=3
3
V
=!
3
a

fi»
3
3
V
^t
3
f
rf
3
3


3
3




II UltLnuwn
S
V
1
U

i
3

r>
3
S
V
_J
•o

3
S


3
S




O
•i
s
s

1

•0
3
«J
3
§
•i


3
3*
V

g
d
3
3


3
3




, UMnpwr
M

S
V
d
3
3
V
d
3
3
V
d
3


•o
3
!f
3
j
3
S'


3
S



,
s
C
3
3

~2
S
V
d
3
S
V
d
"3
d
3
?

r!
2
d
3
3
V
d
3
S


3




|
C
3
3

=3
1
d
3
-4
3
_J
"3

_,
3
1
j
3
3
V
If
3-
3


s




5
3
S

d
3
1
d
3
~3
d
3
S

rf
3
1
d
I
^
3
S


4




ffvOU^Uft 11
3
3

d
"3
3
V
d
3
3
V
=Z
d
3.


3
V
j
?
d
1


f




1
3
3

s!
3
3
V
d
3
d
3
S
V
~3
?

d
S
V
J
1
d
3
3


3
f




I
t-
3
f

~3
3
V
d
3
?
s!
3
d
3
3

d
3

3
i
d
3


3
1




1
3
3
rt

=3
d
3
Is
"3
S

s*
3
f
j
3
d
3


3
S
V



S
MPUIU 1
3
3

~3
I
d
3
V
\
d
3

d
3
t
d
3
3
V
_,
3


3
S
V




i
c
D
                                                                                        4f!
                                                                                        s S
                                                                                        2 '5
                                                                                        11

                                                                                        S B
                                                                                         0

                                                                                         g

                                                                                         £


                                                                                         1  !


                                                                                         •Ill
                                                                                         333

                                                                                         "t £ S
                                                                                         s'5 3-
                                           B-22
-------
                                                             TABLE D-10.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN TARGETED SEM1VOLAT1LE MASSES
Simple Nime
Sample Type
Diu of Collrclion MDL
Compound' (|jG>
Phtnol
bhU-CMotoeihrl) Elhcr
2'OiIoiof)h«nol
1,3-Dichlorohcnicnt
t.4-DichlWObcn«fte
1,2'DichIofobenwne
I'Mcthylphenol
bii!l-OilMpHOp»opH) EJitr
N-Nilro«M!i"ii-Piaf>»l»mine
J-Mclhjlphtitat
He lachlot oe thaiw
Nibobcft»nc
Isophwon*
2-Niffophenol
J.J'DiriKlhflplKnol
Utrifoic And
t>it(l-O>lixucJx>t)') Mcitiaiic
Z.l.nkhtorophrnol
1 J,4-TricMotob£he
10
i a
10
ID
1 0
1,0
I.O
ID
10
1.U
1.0
10
I.U
10
10
1,0
1 U
10
10
i a
10
ID
XAD-3
Thict
I/3WJ
. (PC)
1200




,.

••
«
••









95 if

,.
XAD S
TMfl
2/JW
(MG{





..


'

--


-

..



9ltf
-
,.
XAD.?1
Tdin
unm
IpC)
J10
••



..



..


"
..
..



..
«u*r


XAD-I2
Thin
WS/93
(liC)
IJO

„



*IAI>
•-
-•
4JA


--
-

••



260**
-
-
XAD 40
Field OIL
WW
W)


-


.,
7.<*»
--
«

..
-.
••
••


••
-

JUU*"


XAD-1&
Thin Rub
•WCM
(MO)
n.o
«

..

..
94*


•-
-
,.
..

•-
•-

••
..
jot*
.,
.,
XAD-27
Thin Rub
«WJ
(l-Gj
]JAI

.-
..
„

tOAI
«
~
IJAS
-
..

••
-
70*



1 00**

„
XAO-JI
Thin Rub
5fl4«3
(MG!
J3AB


.-
--

I7A
..


..







-•
JOU*"


XAD3TD
Thiit Rob
unm
IpC)
J8A"
-.
..

..

St**


1J*«





49*


..
9_JA|


XAD-41
Field Blk
J/2WJ
(pC»
7jA»


..

.,
i.1M


2.W**



--

39 0*'



67A»

-•
XAD-8
TKilitr Oik
I/1I«J
(pC)

-

-
--



..


-
•-


.,



JU«C


XAD-H"
Ficilirr Blk
4^4fl3
(jrG)
49*'

..









^






5, AH

--
XAD-JO
rxililf Dlk
3/J«3

     t A Ccrnpovndl t^c lifted in ft«nuoa iiine ordst
     Thkl a AGIO hoi mil without iub(*r, thkk liycr
     TTiin « ACtO hw-niii wiihaui niter, Ihin Ij^ff
     Thin Rub > ACIO hoi-nui »iih nibbe>. ihin tiyci
     IW Dlk • Field blink
     Ficilii)' Dlk • Fictlily blink
     MOL ' Mrihad licuxlion linul
-• = NDI dtlKled II tht MDL UK) uiiifiti the rondiiioni tot taowaut A ind D
A • Mul of ihil cwnpound in uVil limplt U NOT |rciicr ihwi ihlcc liinei i)X) uV i N'OT |r«i!e( thin iKire u'mci (]X) the i>cn(c firiiny blink lir ccncenuiu'on
C • Compound picKni in libotnar; blink: back|iaiind fubinriion NOT pcrfcmcd
* - Some oiitblt 
-------
P





O
a


S
o



z

<

I-
x

u

2


O
a:
O
LJ
Jt
s = « _
lf£*
'» I «
if1"
•f = g -
3sl —
s«s-
S15S*

Q u
Sodpptt Nunic
Sample Type
D»(e of Collection *
Compound* (





;

















o

|





1

*

0-


<
w


«





•»
-,

|| 2 MflVnjphihilrr* j




:
;

















o
•
I Hctichtorocxtlopenudienc




'


















3

S
pi





•

















o

1 2.-l,J-Trich1oiDphtnol





•










•






O

II l-Chtororupkhalene




•











'






0

j










I












a

|| Dinvthytphlhiljlc:




:
'•

s















8

t
c
b























s

fSI





!

















O

j




•
I

















0

Arenaphthcnc























o

j





;

















o

|| 4-Nmophfnol





;














>


q

j




:



3
™"






t






O

|| Dibcmofuran
X
J
a
p"
X
a
-b
a
^


a

ffi
—
a
-T
|
a
5-
_
a
-
a
"
=

s





B
a-




,

»



i






0

|
i
r-























0.

«
UJ























=>.

j





I




.








>,



o,

•B
c
|
•S
tl
A
1





|


^



^
•O


a
•e
I





O

j
                                                                                                             1
                                                                                                                      3
                                                                                                                      c



                                                                                                                      i



                                                                                                                     -•i



                                                                                                                      1

                                                                                                                      A

                                                                                                                      >.




                                                                                                                      I
                                                                                                                      W
                                                                                                                      *•
                                                                                                                      n

                                                                                                                      c
                                                           B-24
-------
                                                       TABLE B-10.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN TARGETED SEMtVOLATILE MASSES (concluded)
Sjmptc Nljne
Sample Type
Daw of Collection MDL
Cotnpwnd' (jiG)
J-Bromophtnyl-Phcnyl Eth"
IlciicMorobenicnc
PeniachloroptKaol
Phcnvurucne
Anthracene
Ji.n.Butylphlhilne
nucnnihenc
I'yirerW
Oulyltxnrytpritniliu
JJ'.Dichloiorjcluidint
Chfyw ne
DtnioCi)inUiriccne
bill 2 ElhylheiyDphlrulile
Di-o-Ouyiphtliililf
Bfniotbjfluorunhtne
IlrniiXkinuoiinirwne
llrpiiC)
..

,.
t.t*
-
too o*8



..

..
5.I*1
--



-•



XAD-9.
Thin
2/Urt)
nm
(\&)

-

I.JAB

Jt.0*'
.-
--
--

--
-
jjABC
--
-.
"





XAD.:?
Thin Rub
J/17A1J
(fOJ
..
•-
.-
-.
~
K».l/
-•
»
u«
»

--
JJ^







..
XADOI
Thin Rub
5/1W
liiG!
-.

.-

--
IOO*B

3JA§
5.7


-
90*"
9.4*'







XAD 2JD
Thin Hub
4/37/9)
(1.GI


„
..
-
200^
--
--
iV*
--


i.4A*






..

XAD-JI
Rtld UH
4^J7/93
IpC)
..


110*'
2.7*»
51 0«
37*"
]9AB
1.5A|

•-
••
4.J*"
7JAB





••
"
XAD-!
FKiIiiy Mlk
2/1 im
t^c»
..
..



JSO*'






j.1*"

-


..



XAD 18*
Facility Ult
J/U/V3
(pC|





16 O*8






4,A«:




•-



XAD-30
Fjctliiy Dlk
5WJ3
(HG)
,-



-
94 0*'


U*B



cr>[« (iciliiy blink nun or dtt ivrnjc firIJ blinl; mui,
   whichever ii |it>Ur (ivrrjjo will irwlujc dciccutm IMu u ippopriitc)
D • Air concenl/tllon of ihil compound in iriii tunplc it NOT |«>i»r AM three linici (IX) ilie i^rj£» ficihty bl»nl ui corKrnujtion
C « CompxxifiiJ pttwnl in laboijtory blink: bacliiourid mbmrlidn NOT perfooiicd
F * The rrvui for thil compound in Ihil tviiplc cic«Ji uSe inttrumcni ciltbnuon iinjf but U »nhir, lintu unf
• » Somt >iiiblc ifunife in filter rJ(c
-------








JTIt, \TIONS
D
o
u
*J
o
12
D
B
u
<
H

£
h-
rv
/*i
X
O
z
o
cr
O
^
LJ
<






•:::: :: - : —
U
2*al
yj S = u
1 > C *
si-
Q i* i "*«
7r • C O
x ijj "° *
L-
"•» 5 -^ *»
HIS
« * ' *
•o a -\
0 £§ f
t.
U ^
IB
lift
i-Ii
JjfS .
IJH
1 * I — 'g
ij|f4
s
ii i
> *
2 .E ?*Jf
X "
o> 2 "^.
5S5Q*
Q ,S ^ ,£
xf 5
r-
O
„
S
«.
«e>
V
5
„
=


•c
~
c


•5
C

»






fM'0»>


•'


„
~








,.

I'HI'J (I*MI»«
S
ff-' 	 '=
1






^1
V

;



n
*^*
1?










•s
r
5
5

1-4






V





fl
?








o

1
5


V




',
?'
V





~,
n








o

wobtnttnt
|
ssss







Fn
V
!




r^
c>








o

c
S
i
B
5

?

-




rg
a
V
•0
£
R
«

f
9

|






C

c
u
j:

^






p^
V





~
^








c

^
iZ!
j bii(J.Ch

5






V





~
Sf

!






O

1
5
z.
__
5



!


S
V
?,

c
E
O


«
?

te
0






O

e
i
•5
_
5






*^
V





~
-
-T
?
V
:

;


~
 1
"-,

O*


~





,



o


I] Dcnioic

?






V


:





|
•S
V
* *•
*n -s
Jl jr
-. **
> V
- y
i - ""
°g-II
1 r = ; s
:U!s
* K H g
lliil
| s g •• i

S £ | -5 t
5 " ^ | », ^
-3 •= . ~ \ 1
- 1 S- ! 1 1
i 1 1 ! i !
^ 1 5 . e E
I 1 S * s s
^ s §1 *•*
l?j!I!
• * * • •
' < a U •


-S t 5 J-
J! J .S *
-I 5, -s ;
'i t * e
.ilj'hl
•o '» 3 •= j «
ir * » £ j> o
ri-i i = l
S 3 |G^|
jl ;|J2
B-26
-------
                                              TABLE D-II.  ORGANIC XAD-2 TRAIN TARGETED SEMIVOLATILE AIR CONCENTRATIONS (continued)
Sample Nwne
St/itplc Type
Our of Collection
Compound*
Itf»xhlorocrclofKn«di.4.&.Trichlofophcnct
J.J.S'TtkhlwoptKnol
2"ChIOfOn»phl}i!i)*n«
2-NnfWJiiline
Din* thy IphtJuliic
Accnlphthylene
2.6'D(>hcnyt I'hrnyl Ijhcl
lUiKHIorobentetic
P«ni«h!«oph*no(
Phtnuiducnt
MDL
(uC)
1 0
to
1,0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
10
1,0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
10
10
IU
1 U
10
10
»0
1.0
1 0
1.0
XAD-3
Thkk
\ntnt
jiC/m1
--
•-

•-


--

••


..


• 12.07]

..


--



OII9At
XAD-fi
Thin
mm
pGMi1

--

-
»



..
~
..
-
«
..
2.669*"


-



,.
-
OW*
XAD-9
Thin
2/II/9J
pGftii1

..




••

-•
--
-•
..
••

J266**
..
-
•-


„
.,

047«AB
XAD-IJ
Thin
M5/53
(iG/m1
„









-•
..
,.
-•
M5IA>


..

O.B3*'



UJSI**
AVERAGE
Thin
liG/in1
00212
<=0,2i2
•c«0,JI!
<=O.J12

••



2UJ1A

-•
-•
,.
XAO-lTD
TTiin Kub
4/2 WJ
jiO/m1



..
"




--




I.75U*'









AVERAGE
Thin Hub
pC/m1
<*02JJ
<=O.IO
<4J2JJ
<=02IJ
<°0.2J]
01J)
«41.}J3
«424)
^MJ.W)
«»OJJ3
<«0,«J
<«:.»34
<=03«3
< =021.1
t"U!JJ
}41
ol.IW
<-O24)
<=O.J4)
<=tllJ1
c«
-J
     I e Compoundi tfe lined £n icicnlion lime order
     Thill - ACIO hot-mil without lubber, ihkl liyer
     Thin " ACIO hoi-mit *iihoui rubber, ihin Uycr
     Thin Rub <• ACIO hot-mil with rubber, thin liyer
     rxiliif Dlk > Ficiltir blink
     MDL > Mclhod dnrvlion Unlit
-, » Not dcircicij il tJic MDL and iilitnci the CHidilioni (at (tttAnout A ind D
A « Mill of thii conpound in ihii lunplt l< NOT |r«jtci thin thicc tiiixi OX) tht I'Cfitc (icilf.j blink mui at ite ixiije HdJ tlinl null,
   ohkhcvcr ii fieiicr (i«cn|CI will include JelKUon limiu  11 ippropriitcj
n « Air ccnccrtu-iUon of ihii compound in thii timplc il NOT ficilcr inin (him liniei |3X) tht iwrjf< firilii)> blink >ir CDitrrnmutM
-------
O
J-

UJ
(j



8
§


3
tn

Q
O
an


«•*

Q


X

O

z


D
a

ii:
j
ra
u
U ». -
list
> li. *.
S ° ••>••
u
•- 1 ~_
->•<
Q i-£ -1
X ' j S a
' S""|~^

Pi fx (t *"e
Q = gS
— * -1-
lilt
x (S "* a
5|--B
x (E "* a
1* 1
<
5ISJ
X « a


e
U
f

•




?







1







O

f n i o( b )ft i»of in the ««
a
5






i







5

:





q

rnnXDriuoruilhcie

v






•»




:
•

r*

:





o

1
a
f






f

••


:
.

1

:
';




0

«!cnx I .J,3-cdJpjrren«

o






5
V







M







a

j

1






; frro=>

:





ft

•





s

X
V
K.
JC
C
Q
V






V




:


«N







3

|
a
                                                          I ,
 -« *3

 I I

 JI  !
 i u  i
 tL S  -E

 ill
 •• K  5
                                                          I 111
                                                          — y E o
                                                         IS3lll
                                                         ^sls^1
                                                         < 6 &-S t "
                                                         * "3 « ^ O **
^ .= -§ 'I -.
If3'|l!
•5 5 = i * 3
s " '» I £• B

JSHli
ailjiE
                                                         q 8

                                                              U u.
                               B-28
-------
                                           TABtE H-12.  VAPOR  PHASE. TENATlVliLY IDENTIFED, SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS - AMOUNT/SAMPLE
Sunplt Nune
Simple Type
Due of Collection
Compound'
l.J-Dinicirljrl-I-Pcniinol
1.5 .8.1 1,1-l-Peniaompenudecine
I-(l-Mtlh(MjctrioCI5 Alline
>CI5 Alline
>CrS AllyliiHidt
>Cfi lltimcdiolt Acid Etttr
5.C20 All cue
>OO AILcne
>CI AriJ
>CI thftntftae AcM Ener
Add EJitr
AerJ (Uler
Acit) Eiler
AILenc u> Cycliultlne
AUcrx 0 CyclaalLiiK^ToelutJon
M1j{ Cxclapopifle
Hcnulitrhydi
Df 1n>l)).; tiolr
Cll Acid Euet
CI3 CI5 All>«
XAD-J
Thirl
1/2S/9J
Mt


j,MN




JyMN
6JMH












XAD &
TTlin
I/-I/91
Ml



39-M"
MMN


5,MN













xXo-s
TM»
^U^J
PI




jj«N


J7M-"


I9v.v










XAD 12
Thin
2/2 J«J
Mt



3, MX
«v«*

(20


J3M,y











XAD-4U
l-'iiU D!k
LCSrtJ
«





6U
J9








Jl





XAD-I&
Thin Rub
4f7/93
CC




65"

940







no



no"


XAD-27
Thin Rub
-I/J7V93
VI






I!UM














XADJ1
Thtn Hub
S/2J/93
CE
Jiu-^





5K)










IIOM
«l»


XAD--II
F.HJ Ulk
J/77/9J
Mt
no





130










IIU
16


XAD-I
r^il»x Bit
Z/11/9J
ME




!J


JS
2J












XAD-U
IVility Hll
J/H«3
«




n

77


I!











XAD. 30
IVitiif Ull
3/7/7J
MS
3W
21

















3J

TO
ro
     I t Cornpoundi uc liucd in rcicnlion lime o>dct
     TTiict * AC/0 hoc-nu't wigM>ur rubber, ifikt liycr
     Thin * ACIO hot-rru.l vilhoul rubber, thin lifei
     Thin Rub « ACID hoi-rnii »itb rubber, ihjis lifer
     FitlJ DIV a F.clJ bltnlk
ficitiij Dlk • Fniliiy Mml
M • Mm of Uiil cwnpouml in ihii iintplc it NOT itttur Ihui ihitt tinKi (IX) the Htujt fviliiy biiAl nun or the nciifc 'i'U blut mui.
   ^htcSever h greater {ateijfet include minimum TIC imounu 11 appropriate)
N » Air corvrrKruion of lAt) compoumJ in tWi wmpfe i! KOT |ie3Hr Ihin (Jure im*i (3XJ the iteri(e Ixilaj blink concenUiiioB
(continue,)}
-------
1
 u

UJ
-J
a.
2.



I"
in
Q
2
=>
U
_l


<

O



LU
•a

d

K
LU

>




U


u
C/}
<

o.
s
>
GO

U

a
J4
X XK
2 S *•>
o .s z 2
X .!* "*
O K 5 ••
^ "4 ww ^*
^ M
u.
< ? 5f *
X .T •»
I|I5
U|«
s!?2
Kf.-'
Hi-
p!"
Iis5
x k 5

a -J ft -
XP» a
S^l "



Simple Name
S«niple Type
Due of Coikcliofl
Compound*


























CIWTIS Alkine





a



c»
_^_-















1









»

1
S



1









[ C2 Ornune


























1 CI Phtfiilifc















S










Dime or Alcohol
8










R
S
2
3
£

f-V

Z
s


8

wm


g
|| DittSytbcracni 3 ID
*o


Tt


T





I"*


R
1
1




£
*o
£1

c
§
u










_












3
u
K
D
£

£
a.
S
u










-









S

g
s
»>.
s
O
ll fici.tnediotc Acid.

















K


»M

y
r*
*f



1




















8





1 N'oninal









*

\

s






•i.

a



1
s























S
•s
•in
—
O

3


S
W|


Wl

fc
1
§

«**
3
1




1



K
!•
•


•*%

s



•r

3
i'
X

•A
PD
z
J
•0








C
c
3


_

[7,



O*


i



X
M









11 Unlnown



IN








X



5K









c
I












a
r*













1
























c

O
I
E;
5
























c

O























S
s
i
u
1
O
O
c
s
A
                                                                                          i i i £
                                                                                          i s« e
                                                                                          s = * -s
                                                                                          ill"*
                                                                                          •3 '* I -g
                                                                                          £«*••"
                                                                                          "^ '1 -3 5 —
                                                                                          a a g o *

                                                                                          |sS
-------
                                     TABLE fl>J2.  VAPOR PHASE, TENATIVELY  IDENTIFED. SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS - AMOUNT/SAMPLE (concluded)
• • - ' - — 	
Simple HiiKt
Sawpl* Type
Dale of Cotltction
CompoonJ1
,,M,U,,tt«aW,V<
H-M^Lr,^,,,*™,*
CM Hexanedtoic Acid Eiicr
Ct PhUtaJjie
Minimum TIC Amouni Reported

XAD-3
Thick
I/JSJ9J
l>{

„«»


20

XAD6
Thin
mm
Ml

M«


31

X/*D-9
Thin
1/11/53
ft
Jl**
4J«,


' U

XAD-12
Ih'in
MSWJ
MI




JJ

XAD-JO
HelJ Ulk
MiWJ
ft

39

30
10

XAD-16
TWn Rub
J/7ffJ
a




51

XAD-37
Thin Rub
4Wf)}
n



««•
27

XAD-J i
TVm Rub
J/lj/VJ
CI



„«»
»

XAD-41
r«u on
JO7/9J
Nl




39
	 ^ 	 * 	
XADB
Fviliif Bit
J/ll/9)
Mt

21


10

XAU-ll
Fifilil; HIV
•UNA]
VJ
21


2U
IS
~~ — *— ~ 	 — ~
XAD JU
rv>i"r bu
3/7fl)
ME



44
II
ro
      I = Compoundl ire lined in telention lime aiicr
      Thick • ACtO hoi>mU kithoul nibfcrr. i^ifk hfcr
      Thin a AC!0 hoi-mil Hiihoul njbbtr. ihin liyjf
      Thin Rub * ACtO hot-nun ollh nibtwr. thin )Jfcf
      r.rW DtL . Fic
Facility Bit •> Pacilily blank
M r Mut i( i\ii compound in  (""pie <> ^'OT {rciur Oiui duct liincl (3X) the »vttJ|< firility blink mui or ihr
   whichever H |t
-------
 O

 P
 UJ
 u

 o
 u
 Q
 Z

 p
o
1-


5

u"
in
X
O
a

ta
" 5 3"e
H^
u.
S 5 -, -
«,
iJii
x -J A *
u_
Jilt
^ I 5"
* -I 5 ^
><[;">
l"'lt
I in
IgS'B
SJS*
I'^Ii
i»R
i»n
Iili


Simple Nuiw
Simple Type
Dili of Codec lido
Compounj*
?




s
o
K

"










| 2,-l-Diinelhyl }-Pcnluol
*!-,




^











=
K
jr
•T





_










5

"5
I













s_
a
»**

5
•t



j
y


HO
g






S


3
at
a
X.



1
5











8
o






| >C15 AliylimiUc


eo


3
9
p.
^

o
S
-r
r*
E
O
i




.2;
1 >CIS riciincitioic AciJ E



-

— -








55
3i
i^


| >C20 Alfcrne



-r
-r












oe


>C3U Alktnc


~










-r





| >C8 Actd














*r



to
U >Ct Heiintdioic Acid C





-













w



















"C



















14
,J-










O
»•*








u
E
b
^
<











3







II AlVrnc or Crclcullanc/C





-













| Ally! Cyclopropane





3
o
*•












i
|
a





S
o.
"s
£


p>f








|| BrnicKhiuole
™


















u
."8
U



















CUCM AUinr
I
J)

s   I
^   M
w   b
r   s

s-  S
    u


i   i
                                                        B-32
-------
                                TABLE U-13.  VAPOK W1ASE. TENATIVKLY IDENTIFED, SBMIVOLATILE COMl'OUNDS - AIR CONCENTRATIONS (cominucd)
Simple Ninie
Simple Type
Due of CoHeciion
Compound1
CIJ-CIJ AlkMtt
CI3-C15 Alkine
C1 BcntCnt
C! PhlMlllt
Dime or Alcohol
Ditihylbcntinc homer
Elhyl El ter«3 "Phenyl-2-Propcnoie
Acid
Flhjl Eiicr-3-Phtnyl-l'Pronc'noit
AcM
Hcitnediaic Acid, Diociyl Eiur
llrpiinil
Noninil
Ocunil
Pouiblt Alkylcyclohoant
Slyitoc
UnVnown
Unknown
Unknown
Ufttnovm
Unknown w/sJ O«Jtei»
Unknown -/>J Oijjfni
XAO-J
. TNkk
1/28/9]
fg/">'





ifiO*1"
J.7IMM

37.7]
I.I7UH

6WM"

]7.7]»w






XAD-6
Thin
2/W1
Mt/m'





MM
7 1IMK

IS.9T
1114
22.1 -1
17.13"








XAb-9
Thin
2/1 MJ
pj/m'





1.93""
9.J«MN


,iWMW

UN

74 tMM>l
II7J""





XAD-ll
Thin
J/IV9J
ft'"'


,,,MH



9.7I«N






57JN
11.31"'-
7.J3M"
,5|W



.XAD.JO
RrlJ Elk
mm
Vffm1




000
oou
• QUO






DUU
OUU





XAD 16
Thin Rub
•1/7/93
li(/m'


II8S


ISOi""





|]J«M

3S« W
H.J4""
31 7!4"'




XAD-3J
Thin Rub
4/2 7«J
lit/in1


3637


6,|4MN
6.5?""






434U)
II.OS""
n.nu(<
14.IO*1-"
16.J9"


XAD.JI
Thin Rud
5/24«3
jij/m'


7.6S"N


IJ9J""





n.jcr11

I»43-MN
12 M1'--





XAD-4I
Reid Ulk
4mm
M/m1

000
000








ooo

UUJ
OUJ
oco




XAD-I
Kicility Oik
vnm
Pt/m1

t»3




1)1

11 -JO




mil!
•M42
71J




XAU-II
Fjciitly Ulk
4/4«J
uvm"






J.79






3S.J7
8,5()
378
52 S6



XAD-JU
Faciliry Ulk
S/7/9J
l/g/m1





11,15
684





S.27
H II
474
1580




U)
     N = Compound! uc lined in fcicnuon tinie ordrr
     Thick K AC 10 hcM^mit hithmil rubber. iMck tjiyer
     TTi'in * AC10 hex mii without rubber, thin lljtr
     Thin Rub < AGIO hol-mji with rubber, thin  liycf
     r.tlj Dlk • Field blink
link mui Of the ivcn|c fuld Mint: mui.
Facililr Oti o Pacif iy Mink
H a Mm of *i> conipouml in thn umplc it NOT frnwi ihin Uu« limci (3X) the ivcraf (
   »hkh«vtj it |»s«cr (i»er«jei include minimuni TIC tmounu u ippfoprinO
N * Air conccniniitin of Ihil cornpourxl in init Mmple i> NOT ptiifr thiui ihitt linxi OX) the >\cri|c fwiliir blvik cooccnintJon
-------
                          TABLE 0-13,  VAPOR PHASE, TENATJVELV IDENT1FED, SEMIVOLAT1LE COMPOUNDS • AIR CONCENTRATIONS (concluded)
Sttnpte Ntm«
Simple Type
Out of Collection
Compound'
Uislr*0wn/1*0nibk Caeluriofl
B-MelhflbenuUchjih
n-Mclh^-n-Piopcnylbcniine
CM lft«t»eJ»oie Acid Eiler
Cl Pnfoblc
Minimum TIC AfflWni RcjwrteJ
XAD-3
TMck
1/1143
lijAn'


ro(x/w


J.77
XAD-*
Thin
1/W3
lij/m'


N.«"


6.13
XAD-?
TWn
IflWJ
jri/m1

8.TJMN
»J*M(*


J.92
•,^ , .in.tUH.m'Sggl^rri 	 lil^S^
XAD-II
TMi
1/5WJ
U»*n'





6JS
•g*1!"^ — ' • j^- — :n 1-
XAD JO
r«w cfk
MJflJ
Mt/rn*


000

000
000
XAD-16
Thin Rub
mm
f»|ftnj





IMS
XAD-H
Thin Rub
mws
IJffai1




Ull^
6.M
XAD-JI
Thin Rub
SflW)
pj/rti*




11.91^
7.6J
j XAD-J(
' r«M Blk
« J«t»3
i (i|/i»'


1
i
I.
t

OOU
XAO-t
Ficihij DIk
MI/9J
«8/m*


409


1.93
XAO-I*
Ficilii^ blk
4W93
VS/rn1

J.5I


J01
3.11
x*o-m
Ficililf DIk
irttti
ff/mf




11.51
•1.14
• • Compoundl *f* litmf in meniian limt «(fer
Thick « ACtO hM-Riii »ilfK>ul rvMxt, iMii'l Ii^*r
Th!n o ACIO hm-n'ji without rubber, Oiin li)rt
Thin Rub « ACIO hoi-inii wi* rubber. tWn l»ye»
r«W Bit - Fwtd
Fici'iif Bit • Fxit'if blink
M » Win oC *ii nunrKmnil In Ah i»™p*« t» "OT i«««c> tfiw i*i««
   •hit ht*« 1] |w«ef (»enfcf t«ris* (tminmrn TIC imotiou U
H m Al» t
-------
                                                     TAULE H-I4   ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN TARCETBD SEMIVOLATrLE MASSES
Simple Niflw
Simple Type
Due of Collcciton
Compound*
Phenol
bittJ.Chloroethjl) Elhtr
2-CMwophtnol
IJ-D!thIo««bichtofob]j>ri«nol
ilcntoit Acid
bi«2.OilorocUlo«y) Median*
^•Divrtlnophenal
1 ,2,4-Trichlof obcnunc
Niphihifcnc
•I'OilwoJUiHinc
HritrhlcHobuiadtcnc
4 CMoi»0-M(lMpri
..
•-

.,


--
-•
-•



..
-.
-





•-


TP-5
T)iin
W/9)
up
Thin Kub
tntm
(MG)

.,
..
..
..

..
..
..


,.







,.
-

-
TF-JJ
1 icld II Ik
ffum
(siGi
.-
.-

..









-
„
-•


-
..
..

••
TF.J
!:«.-iln; Ulk
ttiwi
(pG)


..
..







..




..






TP-26
1 *,l,ly Hit
v\tm
IjjG)
..

..







-












TP.29
I'A-ilttf Ulk
3/W)
(nG»



















..
,.


• ir Compound! t/e lined in feitntion time order
Thkt « AGIO hcx-mii wtUiDui rubrx'. ihkk liycr
Thin « ACIU rtM'mii wiihout nibWr* Uiin Ijytr
Thin Rub • AGIO hoi-rni> »iih rubber, thin liyc»
Hit I)Ik .  Held blink
facility OH « fjciliiy blink
MDL • .Vtrdioi) dclcclion Imiil
.. * Noi OcirtlcJ il the MDt ami Ihc null of (hit rotniKxiru) in thii iirnplc ii NOT (tenet Ihui three lime) (JX) the itcn|r ftctlily blink nun
   or the »cti|e field Mint nun. »nkhc>cf ti I'cjirc (ivcutri »ill inclixlc diirction Imilu n in|Kopriiu) and the lii ronccntntitin of
   ihil  compounj in Ihil Itmple 11 NOT fejlti thin Ihtte Iii»i (JX) |J« l»tfi[t tKiliiy blmt til fCmceni/nion
-------
                                                     TABLE D-14. ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN TARGETED SEM1VOLATILE MASSES (conlinucd)
Simple Hunt
Simple Type
Date of Collection
Compound'
? McihvlnjpSiSjItnt
Hetichlorocyclopenudiene
2.1,6-TncWoiuphtnol
M.S TiicMotuphf no)
2"Cht«onjphi)iiI(nt
^-NiUDinilrnr
DiriKlliylpkllllllle
Acrniphlhjrltnt
l,&-Dinii/«olu«ne
]-N'iuoini!inc
Accniphihtnc
2,4-Diniuophcnol
4.N'iuopJKnat
2,4-DimlfWolufne
Ditvniotuiu
Dieihylphlhihie
n«oterw
4 Oilacfihfn)! Pficnyl Ethtf
4 Niuainilir*
4,


co
U)
     I * Compcxjctdi ut litlfd in tcicnlion limt »Jt(
     Thick » ACIO hm.rnji wilhoul rubber, thick \ijci
     Thin • ACtO hoi^mix without rvbbtr. thin layer
     Thin Rub • ACIO hot-mi* with rubber, ihin liyer
     Fid Blk * F»ld blink
Facility Oil * Fjcilily blink                                                                           ,
MDU i Mcihal dctcclion limit                                                                         (
- . Nal Jtiteuit ii (he MDI, anil ike null of Ml ronpound in thii iimple it NOT grtitcr ihvi ihict umci (3X1 ihe iitnjc fjcihif blink nuii
   or UK ivrnfc Field blink mi)i. ohkht'tr it (ftilti (iverifo "ill include detection limiu u ippropriilt) ami ih< tit concrnuiiion ol
   Mi cpoipound in tfii< ilmple il KOT fttittl (Jim thr« umtt OX) the i«trl(t flcitity blink lir conctnlruion
                                                                                                                                                                                                 (crunllnucdj
-------
                                                    TABLE B-14.  ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN TARGETED SEMIVOLATJLE MASSES (conclujcd)
Simple Nlmc
Sinipl; Type
Due of Colleclion
Compound'
PcnixMorOprienol
PheninthFtne
Anthracene
di-n-Buiylphihiliis
FluonntJiene
Pytene
8ul}ltKniylphiAi)ile
3 J" • DieMor obenildi ne
Chrywne
Gcmoit(l-F-ih?lheirl}prillill.ile
Di o Ocl)lphJiilliC
Benzo(b)nuorifl!hcne
(Jeniu(k$nuoruilhene
0ento(i)pyf
J.7
i.9
-
-
1.9
IUJC
•-
I.J*1
-
23*s


••
•-
TF-I7
Thtn Kub
J/7/9J
(HG!

!.!*•

).«*»
).l
<,9
J6


J.7
».S*'C
~
-

I.!*"



..
TF-28
Thin Rub
tmm
OiC)

20A"
..
IJ*»
4.1
7.0
J.»

--

flj'c
..
-

..


-•

TF-32
Thin Kub
SQWJ
(tiGl
.-

..
•-





-•
l.l*'c








TF-2S Dup
Thin Hub
4/23/9J
(MO

I.I*1
..
1.}*"
•1.1
66
3.J


--
96C





-•


TFOJ
Fitld Bll
snjflj
(pG)
-

..
28*B
--

-.



I.I*1*
--


•-




TF-7
Fxililr lilt
Z/tI/93
(uC)


..

--
-.



»
„»»







-
TF-26
rwtiiy Ulk
J/N/9)
yc>
     TKIn • ACIO!io(-mii wiifioul rubbrr. thin lijur
     Thin Hub - ACIO hoi-mii wii)i rvbbrr, dim liycr
     Hd Blk = Field blink
     IV-Mr Uit - Fioliiy blml
MDL > Method detection limit
-- • Not detected ir Ac MDL md iiliinct ihe :ondiiion$ for footnMti A uxl D
A • Mm of diii compound in Uiii imiplc it NOT |iciucr thin (hire limci (JX) ihc i«er>(c [xriliiy blink nun 01 the i»i>|c field bl»nl min.
   wnknevcr ii |ttllc( (iverlftl *HI include (ItOTlion limiu II ippfOprilltf
D ° Air conceniniion of (hit compound in iMi umpte is NOT (rfjicr ihm iKr«< timei (3X) the urnjt litilny btuiV lu conctniniion
C « Corpipound picunt in bbotilorr bfank, b*rlfioui>J lubuiclion KOT performed
-------
                                            TAULE U-IJ, ORGANIC PARTICLE TWAIN TARGETED SEMIVQLATILE AtR CONCENTRATIONS
Simple Nune
Sample Type
Due of Collection MDL
Compound' ((iG)
Phenol
biU7-CM»oeiliy») tiner
J-Chtwophenol -
I ,3-Dichlorobenifnt
1,-l-DitMoiobcnicne
1,1-DichlwobenieiK
7 Mrlhylphtnol
bUU-CMororiopiop^l) Giliet
N-NiUQio-di-n-rropyliJiunc
4 Meihjlfihenol
llcilchloroeihint
Niuobfnurw
Isophorone
2-Niuophtnol
J.-l-OinKuVyl phenol
Urntoic Acid
bMl Ohli»vti>H»rl Mcihux
1.' Dkhlorurthenol
1 .;,4"Trichl«abeni«ne
N'iphihllene
4-CWaroanilifle.
1 lei ichlwofcuix) it r«
4.Chtoro-3.McuVpn«ncl
10
1C
10
1,0
10
I.U
10
ID
10
10
10
1.0
1.0
1-0
10
10
1,0
10
10
1-fl
1 0
10
1 0
TF.4
Thick
I/7S/W
uG/m'
-•


..


-


_
»

,.
••
..

-.

..
..

..

TF-J
Thin
mm
)jC/m'

--
~
• ..

•-

..
-
--

~
..


..
•
..
_
-

.,

TF-IO
Thin
vtim
llC/m1


.-
-
••
~

••

..

..
..
..

..







TF-13
Thin
2/2W
vCtm1

-.


,.
•'
.„
-
.,
..
»




«



„

«
-
AVERAC3E
Thin
lOU]9
«;»0057
<-0059
«-C05»
<«0059

tmm
liCAn1




..
-.


.-

••
..


..








AVERAGE
Thin Rub
liG/m1
<«0060 '
<«006U il

«=OOW (
<*ooca }
«4)U6U
(HI06/J
<^0l>60
«=OOM)
tHIOOO s,
<-OOUJ
<>0060
<-(JU«J
coOlKVO
<°0060
<-«0«)
<4I06(I
<^)0«J
<«00«l
«OU6(]
<>OOCO
<=006C
TT-J
FK.IK, Bit
2NI/9J
(iG/in!


...
..


..
-

•-



••
••
--
--
••
-•




TF JS
Faciiiiy Llk
4«4/9J
(lO/m'
..
--
..
..

..

..
-





.,






••

TF-I9
IVitily Bit
5/7/93
pWm1

,.


-.
--




-•












AVERAGE
f'Kilily
[Ilk
fiG/m'
<«0062
««061
<«fl06I
<«006I
<=0061
<0),06I
<«*l.0«
 ACIU  htx-inii with rubber, thin liyti
      Bit: » Ftciliiy blink
MDL * Meihal dcimicM limit
-• • Not detected n IfK MUt. unJ the nun of ihii compound in thii iintplc ll NOT firiirr llian tfirre imwi (IX) the itf»|t liciliijr blink nun
   or the ivcn{e fidd blink mail, «hichc«ei il fteiur (iveripl will include dtieriion lirruli u ipp>Dpri>ic) u.ij |K< lir ronrenunion at
   ihit cnnpotind in Ml  tvnple il NOT |rt>icr iht/i three ilmti (IX) >l>c i>en(r TicUiiy btuit til eonccnuilion
                                                                                                                                                                                       (tOnlinucd)
-------
                                     TABLE B-15. ORGANIC PARTICLE TRAIN TARGETED SEMIVOLATILE AIR CONCENTRATIONS (cominuedj
Simple Ntmt
Simple Type
Due ot Collection HDL
Compound* (pG)
2 Melhylniphiniklw
tlttacMcfocyctopcniadtenc
J.J.5-TrichltKophtnot
J.-fJ-Triehlwophcnol
1-Chloconiphihitenc
2-NiiKajii!ine
DimtihylphOtiUte
Ae«fi*phthylene
l.&-DiniU«oli*n«
J-Milrivtniline
Acfn*phihene
I.J-DintUopJifnol
•I'Ninophenol
1.4-DinHrctoliKiK
OiVruo/uiin
Dwihylphihalite
HuiMcnc
lOlmophrnrl Phcuyl Elhcr
•f-NitroaniNnc
J.t tJimua-Z-Meihylpfwnol
N^NiuolodtprWnfta/ru'fte
J'Bfwmephtojl-Phcnj'* Elhrr
MeticMcxahciiWK
10
1.0
10
1.0
1,0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
I.U
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
ID
to
IU
10
10
to
to
1,0
i 0
TF--I
Thkk
IflWJ
MG/mJ

-

..
•-

,.
»


»







..




TF-J
TTiin
vm
(jG/mJ


..
.,
..
••-
..

«
-•
,.
.-
••


..


-•




TF-IO
TMn
m w
KC/m1


„
••


l L

..
•-
••
-
-




«





TF-U
Thin
M3«3
(iC/m*
••
•-





-
..
-
-
_
->
--
..
»
..
..
-


-

AVERAGE
TWn
tiOtm'
<«005?
<=5»
c^)OJ9
<»OOJ9
<^),ai«
<>U059
<«UU5?
<«{J,OJ9
<«O.O)9
<*0(JM
«0£0
««.OW
<=«CWJ
<=00«!
<=O060
«4WJ
<=ODU}
<=UM)
ocilUMI
<««0«J
«cOOM)
<=OU«J
<=0«pcf
Thin Rub » ACIO hoi-nui wilfi mbbtr, iMn Iiytr
      Bllr • Fwitify blink
MDL « MuhoJ dcuclion limit
-• • Not dtlftltd II Ihe MDL ami itic nun of iMi compound in lllit lunptr ii NOT |rc»ltr iHin ihic< unryi ()X) Ihc |vcn|e rictliiy blink mi»
   Of (he iveriic Held bluit mui. »Mcr«t«
-------
                                      TABLE 0-15, ORGANIC PARTICLE THA1N TARGETED SEMIVOLATILF. AIR CONCENTRATIONS (concluded)
Simple Hunt
Sunple Type
Due of Collection MDL
Compound* (pG)
PenljcMwophtnol
Phcnajiifirene
Anthracene
di-n-flttiylphltulau
riuorutthcnc
ffttnt
DutylbtniylpMhihic
JJ'-DicMwobeBHifin*
Chrywne
Denic{*)vifliraeriK
bil(2-Elfiy!heiyl)phtJilJ]tt
Di-n-Ocl/lphdiilile
Oenic(b;fluariMhene
DenioCkinuoraAihenc
! Dtn:oO.r96
<-OJH
<=OO}9
<°O061
<«00$5
<=O.OII
<=0«H
cKIUH

rr-rj
TWa Rub
J/7«J
jlG/IB*
„
U067**

0097*1
0111
0.1S7
0.111
-.

OJJ6
OSI6AiC
•.


006»**

-
-
--
TF-I8
Thin Rub
•W27/9J
liG/m*

0116**
.,
0075*'
0,271
04W
0.136
-


O.J«'C
..
-•




••

TF-JJ
Thin Rub
3/J-W)
(iG/m1

.-
„
-
-

..
..


0jij«C






-

TF-2! Dup
Thin Rob
•M17J9)
DG/m'

utw**

007S*»
0271
0.382
OJOJ


••
055iC
.-

-





AVERAGE
Thin Hirtp)
liC/m! '
<=00«) 1
<*U82 j.
<=OD60 'j
<=007»
<-O,l74 ,
f=0 255 'i|
<=0169
•5=0.060 ;•
<^)WjO §
<««.I5S '
<=0,060 j
«r»00«J
<=OOGD <
««b&2 t
07J
<>O061
<=C061
<=0.062
I
t = Compound! ut lilted In Kuntton time niti
Thick a AC10 koi*inii without rubber, iMck li]t
-------
                                     TABLE B-16,  PARTJCULATE-BOUN0, TENATIVELY IDENTIFIED, SEM1VQLAT1LE COMPOUNDS - MASSES
Simple N«n«
Simple Type
Djie at C#J!«rti0*
Compoosd*
2,l-Dintclhyl-2-PCi» AcW
>CU AftUK
>CU Alkuie
>CI3 Aftsne
>C1J AJluw
XTri Aftuw
iCIf AtkUK
>€IIAIUC30 Aeld
Atlcnr or Cyclojlkuif
Uyty(tftlDht«;l|th(hilii«
CJ All)t;fth>'w»ilK
itnul<^)ntiic Aeid
Ikxtncdtaic A«'w), Oin:i>l E«er
Tt^«cne
Unlno^n
TP-4
UK*
I/H/U
M8

jjMH















IJO


TF-J
TTiin
2/<«J
MS

jjMN


















"rp-to
Thin
1/IW3
PI
3»MS
1SMW
















,,MH

TF-II
F«W Dlk
2/1 W)
W


















11

TF-II
TTrMRiA
J»7«
H

„».«





,,MH








9?



TF-II
TTiin Rub
4mm
Vt
,„»«
,j«»

no
|MH
JtM
jjMN
4J«




4J







Tf.M
Thrfl Rub
Sfl-l^J
M
2»*W






1UMH
,,MH
jjMN
«»'
JJMfl





!!*"*


TF.JJ
Held BIk
SQJrtJ
I'S













1)

il




TM
Flcility Oik
1/IWJ
M!
M
6-1















tu


TP.2S
Fitilii? Oik
J/I*VJ
MS

Ji















8


TF-JW
IVIIi., Oik
J/TiVJ
ft
J50
»















11


> « Compoundt uc tliinf in retention time oidtr
Thick s ACIO hot-mil »«licui rubber, lltick (')•'r
Tlitn s ACI0 hoi>tni£ withfiul rubber, thin layei
rNi'n Kub » ACIO tic* nui vlh rubber, ikin liyct
Field Bit « Pwld blink
r«-il r, Dlk . FKiitif blink
Now Struct TF-13 wit euluded tr«m ihti dm Kri Wtint* &t dm |»(tit'
   Incomplete 11 crjuji lf>e Mnnivtiy Idt niiTird tompt.jndi,
M • Mui of Uiii entqKwixJ fn AU untpte li MOT f>«frr (Am AlK liniei
   •Mchtvtr i> lieiM (mriiet ineludt minimuffl TIC unaunu « »fi="^"'''')
N « Aif ranfmrlcJon of ihii sWBpswM In iMi simple n NOT |r*i«r UUA ihite yint« !3X( iht IMU|C ficiliiy Wwk
  iiifrf fcj ilw nnirichtf tibr»««y ft« ikb tunpk »w

» i»t njc fKilJty blink taut or the  ivrr>j< TicU Mink mail,
-------
                               TABLE B-!fi,  PARTJCl/LATE-BOUND. TENAT1VELY IDENTIFIED, SEMIVOLAT1LE COMPOUNDS - MASSES (concluded)
w
1
Simple Nttjie
Simple Tjp*
Out of Collection
Compound'
Ud»...
IM.~.
Unknown
Unknown
IMffHMtfrwiM.CMrt..
Uriknown/Poiiiblt Cocluiisn
Unlno»!s/Yauib1e Ccxtuucn
Unlfl^w-n/Foi lifefe Corltftloft
(MM.^.riM.CDtlrfM
MJniniBifi TfC Ainsunl Reported
TF-J
Thick
M









4]
TF.J
TOn
¥4/91
C(









JJ
'TF-IO
2/1 tfil
Cl









n
TF-il
2/11/9)
Ml









n
tF-II
TMnRub
MI









II
TF.JI
Thin Rub
Ml


««
Jl«





1
TF-3Z
Thin Rub
MWJ
Ml







„«»

• 0
Tf.JJ
BcU Dlk
Ml
11


i
1
\

•
2)''

(I
TT-T
Ficiliry Dlk
vnm









to
TF.36
Faci% Dlk
4H4/9J

1







t
TC-Z9
Fkciliiy Ulk






It
n
9
9
f « Compound t ut lined in Kienuon lime Older
Thick « ACIO btx-mi» *tihoui rubber, Jiirk llff
Thffi w ACIO hor*miii without rabbet, ihJn Itytr
Thk Rui» * ACIO fca(>mii ^icH rubber ilnn layev
Hfld Oik « Field btak
F«ct% Ott • Ftcifilf tlwl
Note; S»mp!; TT-tJ vu ticludcd Trom lliii 4ni «( bet»uic dx did pickitc inmmiitol by Ar cmDwiri liivjiMy for tftii iimplc wu
   jneon>(rt*l* M re|*rlc i« NOT i««" AM ll»« «imf» (JJCJ <*>e i%cra(c f«ciiii)i biaak conctnuwi«n
-------
                                  TABLE B-17.  PAKT1CULATE-UOUND, TENATIVELY IDENTtFtED, SEMIVOLATJLE COMI'OUNDS - All! CONCENTKATJONS
Simple Ntmc
Swnpl* Type
Due of Collection
Compound*
I,4-Dlnwih.y|.2.Pcr,Ujiol
I.! .1.1 1.1-1. Pcnuattpenudrciflt
9.10«Anihmm«diane
>CI3 Aciil
>CU Alkiht
»CI] AHcuw
>CU AlkWK
>CI5 AtlUK
>CfI Alltine
>C1I Alkiw
>CII Alkuw
>C1I AlklM
>C70 ACM)
AlkfM Of Cfdallttnc
UulykyiloheiylltlKliillilc
O Alk)lcycluSe.Mnc
HttuJeCinoic Acid
llrnncjiciif Acid. Oioctyl Eiier
Toluene
Uninown
TM
Thick
i/ij^a
MJ/m1

J(SOMN















let


TFJ
Thin
2/W)
l/Bftn'

U8"H


















TP-IO
Thin
I/UWJ
IH/m'
i.tow
i.«WN
















0»J*W

TF-fl
Pi<-W Ulk
yivH
Mt/m"


















ow

TF-17
TMn Rub
•01^1
lijAn1

j2JMN





1.03UN








ill



Tr-2!
Itiin Rub
w>m
Ml/tn1
J.5IMN
0 7J«M

4.37
0.46""
t.io"
1J3MN
1.J5*1




)6J







TF.J1
Him Rub
i^3JW
(•I'm1
I3,7!«M






0,62""
I.I!"-''
I.4JMN
J«M
1.S6""





1 74«s


TF1J
l:itld Ulk
MW)
Vt/m1













UWI

UUO




TF-7
Facilit)- Ulk
i/IWJ
MtA"'
IIS
3.«S















063


TF-I6
FKilhy U!k
4/N«3
Cl/m1

C.W















Oil


TF-39
Faciliir Ulk
S/7W3
MK/m'
1I.1S
J.36















019


CD
£>.
     I D Ccm^oonJl tit lillrd in rturnlioo lime order
     Thick • ACIO Km mil v'nKoul nibbcr, thklt tjjff
     TIlin « ACIO fin-mil without rvtbei. thin Ityti
     lliin Rub • ACIU hol'nux with rubbci. ilirn layer
     r»Id Ulk - Field Mint
     Firiti!)> Blk • Furilii)' blink
Note: Simple TM J wu ciclitdet) flam ih'i !> KI bccuvc ihc diU p^ckifr mnimiiitd by the ccnuicird labuiorj fur ihii imiplc »u
   iDcowplcic u re|udi die ttf>ati«flir Wemified compoumli
M • Mut of ihii eompoum) in ihii uniple » NOT |ie»l«r lh» Uiir* liinei OX) 0* «»«.£« fxiliijr WAnL null m IIK ivmjc Ftcld bl»nt null,
   wWiheyei i> tinier (ivcfi{« intfuJe nu'ntinum TIC innunu u ipptopritir)
W . Air ConctntiitiOT o/ 1)1 ii rofflpound in <*'' I^npfe if KOT frciter thin thm fliwi f JXJ ifit «vtn£c furiluc blink conccnuiiian
-------
                           TABLE B-17. PART1CULATE-DOUND, TENATJVELY IDENTIFIED. SEMIVOLATtlE COMPOUNDS - AIR CONCENTRATIONS (concluded)
SunpH Ninw
Simple Trpe
Date ct Collection
Compound*
Ufllrtown
Unknown
Unknown
IMbiowfi
Uaiio»ibU Cocluiioti
Untiwwn/t'tniiblc CocMion
Unbiown/PoMibfe Ccxlution
Untno«.n/Follibtf Cocluiion
Minimum TIC Amo«m Rtpenti
TF-t
TMck
WM»
Vl/nl'









J,60
TF-J
TWn
Mfll
«/"»'









IJIO
TV- 10
Thin
2,'fMJ
MJ/m»









06)0
TF-11
Field nik
J/IWJ
pB/m»









ODD
TF.H
TOnRub
4/7/W
dt'm'









1W
TF.2I
Thin jltib
iw( «(tfroui n6t«r, ikin (irer
     Thin Rub < ACIO hex-mil oilfc rubber, thin  Uycr
     r«M Bit * r*W 6f«ik
     Fici'ity Otk c Fictlilr blink
Nott: Swnph TF-U *u ochided ftom ifih dan KI txtiou (he d»u pxktfe nwunliwd fcjr *« cenirvtnt Iibwoty for *ii
   incomplea n rc|Ui)t iht wmlivrlj Utntifisrf compound!.
M  » Muiofttili compound In ihil IJmph »l NOT |rnur tfiw *IM Uimi (K> iht ivtrijc fKrilii)p Mink mui or the ivtrijt Md fcljnt m»s»,
   »h"«ln»ef ii t«i)er (n«rap« ineloje nunimom TIC imouBU M ippoptuw)
N « Air concenl/iriofl of ihii tompound in ihil ivnple ii NOT |ft«i« thui »lu« Hmti ()X) dit ivrrif t r*ilil]f blink tonttnintion
-------
                           TAULE 1MB,  TARGETED ORGANIC PARTICIPATE TRAIN SEMIVOLATILE MA5SES.-ACUREX ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES
Sample Ns/ne
Simple Type
Out of Cotlteilon PQL
Compound 1° (|iO>
NlpMlItne
AcmaphiJiyleiH
Aefft^phihene
Huoien*
Fhcnmihiene
AniJirxtfttf
11uofainhll«CR*U
0.21

..

• 010
0.11*
1.41
IJI

sm

i.j]
141
0.12*"
OIOAB
O.H*1
TF-II
FieU Oft
VIM)
(MCI



..
..
»



.,

..



„
TF-IJ
TTiin
MS«J
(M0>
0,10**



06J
0.1J«
1.31
U4
t.»
J,(6

i,«
0!6
021
OJ7*»
OH*
TF-IT
TMn Ryb
4nm
()/G)
O.U*1
0,Ui*"
001**

0*J
oin*»
1,76
24}
U.9T
311
-.
0.10
uio
uu**«
fJW**
OJI*»
TF-21
Thin Rub
«7J9J
tl E ACIO feo4 nvi withotii rabbcr. ihirk lift!
Tliin - ACIO hM-mii vilhoul rabber, ihln liyn
Thin Rub « ACIO hoi-miji with rvbkt, thin  lijrc'i
11J titt • Ficlii blink
> -.ilny Hit, • fir hly blank
[•QL. • PrKtical qujnuution Dmii
.- * K« Cltircicd II ftt MDL ami miificl (Jw conditioni fof fonwcKct A uid D
A » M*II oTthii compound in Ml funpte f> NOT f<»i(r ihu thirt limci OX] ihc Jvtrijt ficilily blank mui <(>{I firriiljt bllnl lit con»n[l»lton
-------
                              TABLE B-19. ORGANIC PART1CULATE TRAfN SEMIVOLATILE AIR CONCENTRATIONS--ACUREX ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES
Simple Hunt
Simple Tj.pt
Dilc Of Collection PQ1.
Compound!* (|iG)
Naphthalene
Accniph[}i}lcQe
Artniphlhcnc
HuwcM
Pheriinlluene
Anthracene
FluQiiflihene
Pyiene
Bcnp)'tent
Dlh ACIU Kuc-iiui oilhoul Albbcr. thick l
     Thin • ACIU Kl< i« NOT imut shin Am iin*> OX) At «vtnt« twtlilji MM* m«i or Iht ivtnjc field bluil mill.
   • Mchcvcr il frelUr (ivcnfd will includt ifcltcUon limiu M tppfOpriiH)
B « Aif eonccnunioo o( iJiii compound in thii iimplc Ii NOT |itiier inm i)i«« limei (3.X) ihe ivfrife fKiliiy Mml lit conrcnUition
-------
                        TAULE IM9,  ORGANIC PARTICULATE TRAIN SEMIVQLATILE AIR CONCENTRATIONS-ACURF.X l-NVmONMGNTAL ANALYSES (concluded)
Simple Minie
SjMipIe Type
Dak of Collection
Compound!*
Htphthalene
Aceniphibytcne
Aeenapbthfne
Pluorcne
Phenlnlhrcnt
Anthoctn*
Eluorinthenc
fyttnt
D*nio(iSinihracene
Ouyiene
Bento(b)nuoruilhene
DtnioI(n4
0.224
0,120
OS«
..
0112
0,051
0017
0(121
002J
TF-IO '
TMn
2/1 WJ
iKJ/m1
001}
..
--

0046
0007*
out]
0.075
..
0291
..
oin 6
008!
0,007*"
0,006*"
0(W9*9
TP-IJ
Thin
W3*»
tiG/in*
0005*"



0034
0006**
OtX.1
0065
OUT)
0.15J
•-
U077
0029
0.011
oow>*°
UOOT'
AVERAGE
Thin
liG/m'
•CeOSOt
<»OD01
<«O.OOJ
<4>OOJ
««0094
«-O.OI]
<-o.n&
«>O.I2I
<-006?
•ceCJM
<«0003
•ceOtni
<>OU54
c>OOU
<«OUI1
<=o.ON
TF-n
TTiin Rub
tnm
liGim1
0.008*"
000)*'
oral*8
,.
0031
0.0H*1
0.107
0,149
0059
011!
,.
0049
0,011
OOC5AI
OOUJ*"
OOU7*8
TF-Jg
Thin Rub
•W7/S)
pG/rn'
0004**
0002**
ooot*6
OM1AB
0078
0.016
016]
0119
001]
02J8
0,081

U027
0009**
0006A>
0012
TPOI
Thin Hub
S/I4/9J
uC/m3
0004*"


..
0007*°
0001*"
OLJ2I
00)1
0011
0037
..
OU24
OU06**
OUOZ*"
OOJ2*1
OtMJ*'
AVERAGE
Thin Kub
pG/ni1
<««oos
<=0(JOJ
<=OOU2
«000]
unM
000***








TF-29
(Vilii, (Jit
5/7/^J
pGAn1
OtHl**
-


OUOI*"
OOOIA"
UUMAB
0004AB

OOU4*"
OOOJ*"
9(JOJAB
' 0«)JA1
0004*8
UOWA*
OUO4A"
AVERAGE
I JtilJy tllk
pG/m'
«=U003
c=iiii)
D • Air conccnuiiion of ihil ronipovd tn ihii (intplt it NOT ficKer thin ikcre linicl (3X) iht titiift ttctKlf btud lit cooccnuiuon
-------
                                                                             TAULE 11-20,  SEMIVOLATJLE ULANK MASSES
Simple Name:
Simple Type:
Due of Colltt lion:
Compound*
PSenol
bill! Oilofoelhyl) EJicr
2-ChIoropnenol
1 J-Didilorobenrcne
M-DkhlODbcnune
U-D'ichlorobcnulK
2 Mtihripncnol
Vn(Z-ChIotoisi)p«opjO Eihei
N'Niuoia-di-n-Propylanune
•l-Meihylphcnol
M< * fccMoroethiflc
Niuobcnuix
Jiophorooe
I-Niuophenol
2.J Diitvthylphtnol
Denioie Acid
bii(2-Qitoioethoa]rJ Methane
7.-I DichlcfOfhcnol
1 2,t -TrirtlofobtnttiM
hfipli!n»Une
4-CMoioaniliiM
HcaacKlarobuUdienc
MDL
(pCJ
1,0
1.0
1.0
1,0
1.0
1.0
1,0
1,0
1.0
1.0
1.0
I.U
1.0
10
1 0
10
10
1.0
10
10
1.0
10
Lib llUnfc
Lib Ulk
NA
IfC)

..

..

.-

-

-•
-
-


--
-


-
MDAh
_

Lib DllnV '
Lib Ulk
NA


•-
..
-•
--
«
--
-•

•-
--

••

--

--
..
,.
..


tjb Uljfil
Lab 1311
NA
(nC)
-.
-•

--
--
--
--
--
.-
-

-
-
--
..
,.






SV11I.K6IO
Ell Dll
NA

En Nik
NA
(»C)

..

..
-•
..
.-

..

--

--

«

-•
-•
--
..
--

SVULX6M
EH Ull
NA
lnG)

.,



„


.,



--
--








w
A
oo
     I « Contpoundi ve lilted in rcKniiofl lime dcdcr
     Lib Dll " LibotKafj blink
     Hi; Dlk « Eitrviion bluik
     MUL * MciKod ilctmion linul
     • • > Not tkieruJ  it ihi MDi. tnd ittUHci llie
       
-------
                                                                     TAD^E  D-20.  SEM1VOLATILE BLANK MASSES (continued)
Sample Nwne;
Simple T/p«:
Din of Collection:
Compound'
4-Chlotc>-}-Mcihyiph(nol
2-MrUiylnaptiihaIenc
flexacMorocyelopentjdiene
lAft-TffcMwojAtnol
1,-U-TncMoioplienoI
I-ChlonxiiphlhjIcrw
I-Nilttunlline
DinwUiylphllulile
Actntphthylcnc
7,&-DiniUotpluenv
)-Niuri«nol
N-NitioJodiphcnytirtiine
J'B»oniapHfn)f|.ph{n»'l Ether
KciachlMOtKnicnc
MDL
CuO
1.0
1.0
to
I.U
1.0
1.0
JO
1.0
1.0
1,0
I.U
10
10
ID
to
I.U
Id
1.0
1.0
10
to
i.O
10
1.0
Ub Illa/ik
UbDIV
NA
OiG)
-
-


..


-
.,


.«

•-



„

„.
..
--
..
.,
UbDIuik '
LibOtk
NA
(MO
••
..


-•
.,
..

..
-
--



-




-•
-•



Lib Qhnt
Lib Dlk
NA
(vO)

-


...

-

..
,.

..
..
••
--
-
-




•.
..
.,
SVOLK&IO
E.I Bit
NA
0-G)
-
--
..
.-

,.
_
-
..
.,
.,
,.
-•
.,
„
••
..
»
..

..
-


SVDLK6IOD«p
E.l Dlk
NA
()«)



-
-•
..
..
--

..



-•
..
..
-

••
-•


,.
••
SVDLK61I
FM Hlk
NA
(|X3)




.-

..

..


-.

••




..

-.
..

..
I * Compoundi tit liilvd in fgi
Ub Dlk  * Libociiofy Wink
Eti Blk > Fjtruiiwi blink
MDL • Mtitiad dclrclton limil
                                                                                                                                                                                                   troniinu«lj
• - m Not delected n Ihe MDL ami ihc mill or Ihil compound in iJiil luiiple it NOT |»11C( thin Ihtra liirtei OX) the ivtn|< ricilii; blink irusi
   or the ivrrife field blank mill, whkHevtf it ffeairr flvcri|;CI Mrili include detecuoo limiu AI appropvim) MA«J tV tir riMvrcnvtiJon of
   ihii conipomirf in (hit tunplc ii NOT trciift than 1)tr» (imct (JX) the ivc'lie (acilitjr blink lii conceniniicn
-------
                                                                      TABLE B.20.  SEMIVOLATILE BLANK MASSES (concluded)
Simple None;
Svnpte Type:
Out of Collection: MDL
Compound1 (jiG)
Pcnuehforophenol
Phcnamlifene
AmhiJCenf
di-n DuiytphlKalalc
Fluwtnihtne
Pyrrne
DuiylktniytpMhililt
JJ'-Dichloiobciilidinc
ChfJKne
Oc nto(i Jutlhnccnc
bii(2.Ettiylhc»yI>phe
tlcruoUSpJrrtne
UJcnoC 1 ,1.3 -cd )pyieiv
OibetuCl,fi)anthrsc*i»e
Bcntc(f,h.!)pefylcne
BrnKXtJwx
10
t.O
1,0
IJD
10
10
1.0
1,0
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
10
1.0
19
10
10
Ub DLnk
Lib Ulk
NA
OiC)




•-

19.0*
«
.-
"


-


•-
..

••
Lib Dlutfc '
Lab Dlk
NA
(nG>
-





.

,.
-
1.7**
-

-

..
-.
-•
•-
Ijb UUnk
UbDll
NA
G)
..
..


-
--

..
-

.-



-.


-.
1.0*»
SVU1.K6II
Et! Oik
NA
((•C!
..
..


_

,.



1,0**

.-




-•

CO
LA
o
     1 = Compoundi we lilted in retention tune nder
     Ub Dli « Ubonrory Unk
     Cii LMk » Exiraiion bluik
     WDL 9 MithoJ drtKlion limit
     •• • Nw delnud n iff MDL ind iititnei the
        cendriiont for roouvytj A  ind B
A •> Mui of (Mi compound in ihii nmple it NOT inner thu Utiec lin-
   UX) UK iftfi|c f»cilhf bluik mu> w the t»n(r Held Win I mill.
   whichever it {rcltir (l«eril» will iKluch detcelicn linitl u Ippoprilit)
B • Air cone?nuauon "f ^'' compouml in Alt »>m|rf« h NOT ficiur ihin
   Ihiet UAH (3X) the ivcnfe f»cili!» blink
-------
   HC(ppm*10)
    100
CD
     90
     80
     70
     60
     50
     40
      30
        90
                                                         A
                                                         'A
                                                                     A
                                              A
A
                        A
      100
       110             120
T8-surface temperature (C)
130
140
                           Figure B-l. 1/28/93 - AC10 Asphalt Test, total hydrocarbon
                                  concentration vs. surface temperature.
-------
CD

in
JO
    THC (ppm)

    -0.28
    -0.38
      -0.4
     -0.42
     -0.3  -  /WV\ A AW\ /VWV\ AW\ /VWVVWV AW\
    -0.32
    -0.34
    -0.36
-    AA    AAAA     A
         80
             /yyvWAAWW                    A
          90
100        110        120         1301

  T8~surface temperature (C)
140
150
                               Figure B-2. 2/4/93 ACID Test, total hydrocarbon
                                    concentration vs, surface temperature.
-------
CD
   THC (ppm)
    40
    30
    20
    10
     0
       16
                 A   A
          A
                          A
                                              A
                                                  A
18
20        22       24        26
     T8-surface temperature (C)
28
30
32
                             Figure B-3, 2/11/93 Hut blank, tolal hydrocarbon
                                  concentration vs. surface temperature.
-------
CO
t
i/»
Ji.
THC(ppm*10)

 130




 120  -




 110  -




 100  -




  90  -




  80  -




  70  ~
     60
        60
                   80
       100            120

T8-surface temperature (C)
                           Figure B-4. 2/18/93 AClOThin test, total hydrocarbon

                                 concentralion vs. surface temperature.
-------
   THC (ppm)
    200
CD
    150
    100
     50
       0
        80
               A
90
          A
      A   A   A  A
                                            A
100       110       120       130       140
     T8-surface temperature (C)
150
160
                             Figure B-5. 2/25/93 AGIO Thin lest, total hydrocarbon
                                   concentration vs. surface temperature.
-------
   THC (ppm)
    14
    13
    12
    11
    10
co
     8
      40
                A
60
                                      A
     80          100          120

   T8-surface temperature (C)

Figure B-6. 4/7/93 Crumb rubber test, total hydrocarbon
      concentration vs. surface temperature.
140
160
-------
   THC(ppm*10)
   200
DJ
\S1
--J
180


160


140


120


100


 80


 60


 40
       20
                    A
                             A
                        A
   A
                                            A
AA
                                            A
                                               A
                                                                A
                                                   A

                              A
                                                             A
                                                             A
                                                      A
                25
   30          35          40

.T8-surface temperature (C)

Figure B-7. 4/14/93 Hut blank, total hydrocarbon
    concentration vs. surface temperature.
                             45
50
-------
   THC (ppm)

    160
    140
    120
DO
*
O*l

CO
    100
     80
       100
110
  120          130          140

,T8-surface temperature (C)
150
160
                          Figure B-8, 4/27/93 AClO/Rubber thin tesi, total hydrocarbon

                                   concentration vs. surface temperature.
-------
CT
   THC (ppm)
    38
    36
    34
    32
    30
    28
       0
             A
      A  A
50                100                150

    T8-surface temperature (C)

    Figure B-9. 5/7/93 Hut blank, tolal hydrocarbon
        concemraUon vs. surface temperature.
200
-------
   THC (ppm)

   28
CD

Ch
o
26  -




24  -




22




20




18




16



14




12
      40
                   A
                         A
                60
                                  A
                                A
          A
                                                A
                                                 A
                                                   A
                                             A
   80           100          120


 T8-surface temperature (C)


Figure B-10. 5/24/93 AClO/Rubber thin test, total
hydrocarbon concentration vs. surface temperature.
                                                                     A
140
160
-------
   Temperature (C) or HC (ppm*10)
    200
CO
    150
    100
     50
      0
       -50           0          50          100         150         200
                      Time (min.) Since Completion of Paving

              HC(ppm*10)  Tl-5/8" off bottom  T4-3/16" off bottom  T8-true surface
250
                         Figure B-l 1. 1/28/93- AGIO Asphall test, temperature and total
                                 hydrocarbon concentration vs. time.
-------
CO
i
o>
ro
    THC (ppm)

    200
    150  -
    100
     50
      0
     -50
       -50
0
200
                  50           100          150


              T8-surface temperature (C)


Tl-7/16" off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom  T8-true surface  THC (ppm)
250
                           Figure B-12. 2/4/93 AGIO lesl, temperature and loial

                                hydrocarbon concentratio .  •  ' 'e.
-------
temperatures (C) orTHG (ppm*10)
-50           0          50          100         150         200

                Time since completion of Paving (min)

      T1-7/16" off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom TS-true surface THC (ppnrMO)


                   Figure Brl3, 2/11/93 Hut Blank lest, temperature and total
                          hydrocarbon concentration vs. time.
                                                                           250
-------
   temperatures (C) or THC (ppm*10)
    180
CD
160


140


120


100


 80


 60

 40
                                                     V,
       0             50          .  100           150           200
                      Time since completion of Paving (min)

            T1-7/16" off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom  T8-true surface THC(ppm*10)
                                                                          250
                         Figure B-14. 2/18/93 AC 10 Thin test, temperature and total
                                 hydrocarbon concentration vs. time.
-------
   temperatures (C) or THC (ppm*10)
   180
CO
160

140

120

100

 80

 60

 40

 20
                                                              \
                                                               \
                                                                \
       0             50            100           150           200
                     Time (min) since completion of paving

             Tl-7/16" off bottom 2/16" off bottom  T8-surface temp  THC(ppm*10)
                                                                          250
                        Figure B-15. 2/25/93 AGIO Thin test, temperature and total
                                hydrocarbon concentration vs. time.
-------
   Temperature (C) or THC (ppm)
   200
CO
    150
    100
     50
      0
       -50           0          50          100          150         200
                       Time (min) since completion of paying

              T1-7/16" off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom T8-true surface THC (ppm)
250
                         Figure B-16. 4/7/93 Crumb rubber test, temperature and total
                                 hydrocarbon concentration vs. time.
-------
   Temperature (C) or THC (ppm)
   50
CD
   40
   30
   20
    10
    0
     -50
                  /
     0           50          100         150         200
         Time (min) since completion of paving

-Tl-7/16" off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom T8-true surface  THC (ppm)
250
                          Figure B-17. 4/14/93 Hut blank, lemperalure and total
                                hydrocarbon concentration vs. time.
-------
   Temperature (C) orTHC (ppm*10)
   150  -
   100  -
CD
    50
     0
      -50             0              50             100            150
                      Time (min) since completion of paving
            Tl-7/16" off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom  T8- true surface  THC(ppm*10)
200
                      Figure B-18. 4/27/93 AClO/Rubber thin test, temperature and total
                                hydrocarbon concenlralion vs. time.
-------
   Temperature (C) or THC (ppm)
   40
03
is
NO
    30
    20
    10
     0
      -50
                               \
              -^ — -*\
        0             50            100            150
        Time (min) from end of simulated paving
Tl-7/1611 off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom  T8-true surface  THC (ppm)
200
                           Figure B-I9. 5/7/93 Hut blank, temperature and total
                                hydrocarbon concentration vs. time.
-------
  Temperature (C) or THC (ppm *10)
   300
ro
i
^j
o
   250 -
   200
   150
   100
    50
     0
      -50           0          50          100         150         200

                     Time (min) since completion of paving
                                                              i
           Tl-7/16" off bottom T4-2/16" off bottom T8-true surface  THt(ppm*10)
250
                      Figure B-2Q. 5/24/93 AClO/Rubber ihin lest, temperature and total
                               hydrocarbon concentration vs. time,         -
-------
          APPENDIX C




ADDITIONAL QUALITY CONTROL DATA
             CM
-------
                  TABLE C-1.  SVOC RECOVERIES FROM FILTERS
                                 SAMPLE ID: TF-20
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Acennphiliylcnc
Accnaphthcnc
Fluorcnc
1 Phcnamhrenc
jf Anthracene
I Fluoranihcnc
Pyrcnc
| Chryscnc
II Dcnzo(a)anthniccnc
1 Bcnzo(b)fluoranihcnc
Dcnzo(k)riuonnihcnc
__ —
Bcnzo(n)pyrcnc
Indcno(l,2.3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibcnz(a,h)anthraccnc
Bciuo(g,h,i)perylenc
RTI
VALUE
(PS)
150
>_300— =
150
30
. 15
15
30
15
15
15
30
15
15
15
30
30
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(MS) •
0.0
.---. 1.4
1.5
7.9
13.0
13.0
31,0
18.0
17.0
17.0
29,0
16.0
15,0 '
11.0
26.0
22.0
PERCENT
RECOVERY
0.0
- -- - 0,5 --
1.0
26.3
S6.7
S6.7
103,3
120.0
113.3
113.3
96,7
106.7
100.0
73.3
S6.7
73.3
RECOVERY
DQO (%)
50-150
-—50-150' "
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
DQO
MET
No
No "
N'o
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ojhcr Compounds Detected
DicthylphtJiaJatc
dJ-n-Butyiphthalatc
bis(2-Ethyihcxy])phthalntc
0
0
0
2,6
4.5
2,1
                                                                      (cor)tmued)
                                      C-2
-------
             TABLE C-l. SVOC RECOVERIES FROM FILTERS (continued)
                                 SiVMPLE ID:  TF-21
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaphlhylcnc
Accnaphthcnc
Fluorcnc
PhcnanLhrcnc
Anthracene
Fluoranthcnc
Pyrcnc
Chryscnc
Bcnzo(a)nnihniccnc
Bcn7.o(b)fluoran!hcnc
Bcnzo(k)nuornml)cnc
Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
Indcno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibcni(n.h):inthrnccnc
Bcnzo(£.h.0pcrylcnc
RTI
VALUE
(MB)
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
' 0
0
0
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(MS)
o •
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
PERCENT
RECOVERY
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RECOVERY
' DQO (%)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DQO
MET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA '
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Qihcr Compounds Delected
Dicthylphtlialaic
dJ-n-Buiylphihalnlc
bis(2-Eihy]hcxy!)pluhalntc
0
0
0
2.3
3,2
1,7
                                                                       (coniinucd)
NA = Noi Applicable
                                        C-3
-------
            TABLE C-l. SVOC RECOVERIES FROM FILTERS (continued)
                                 SAMPLE ID;  TF-22
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaphihylcnc
Aecnnphthcnc
Fluorcne
Phcnanihrcnc
Anthracene
Fluoratuhcnc
I Pyrcnc
1 Chryscnc
Jj Bcnzo(a)nruhraccne
1 Bcnzo(b)fluoranthcnc
Bcnzo(k)nuonujihcnc
Bcnzo{a5pyrcnc
Jndcno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibcnz(a,h)am'iraccnc
Bcnzo(|,h,i)peryienc
RTI
VALUE
OPS)
60
120
60
12
6
6
12
6
6
6
12
6
6
6
12
12
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(P£)
0.0
0.0
0,0
2.3
4.2
3.9
10.0
5,9
5.2
5.3
$.4
4.S
4.2
2.1
6.9
6.7
PERCE.NT
RECOVERY
0.0
0-0 _
0.0
19.2
70.0
65.0
S3.3
9S.3
S6.7
SS.3
70.0
so.o
70.0
45.0
57.5
55.S
RECOVERY
DQO %
50-150
50-150 ,
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50050
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150 -
DQO
MET
No
._No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Other Compounds Dciccicd
DicihylphlhaSnic
di-n-Buiylpfuhalnic
bis(2-Eiliylhcxyl)phiha!aic
0
0
0
2=7
4.S
2,6
                                                                       (continued)
                                       C-4
-------
              TABLE C-l.  SVOC RECOVERIES  FROM FILTERS (continued)
                                  SAMPLE ID; TF-23
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaphlhylcnc '
Accnnpluhcac
Fluorcnc
Plicn.imhrcnc
Anthracene
Fluorruuhcnc
Pyrcnc
Chryscnc
[_Bcnzo(a)anthraccnc
BciuQ(b)riuonvmhc»c
Bcnzo(k)riuornmhctic
Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
IndcnoO^-ccOpyrcnc
Dibcnz(a,h)amhraccnc
Bcnzo(g,h(i)pcrylctic
RTI
VALUE
G'2)
60
120
60
12
6
6
12
6
6
6
12
6
6
6
12
12
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(PS)
0.0
1.2
1.1
3.6
5.2
53
12.0
6.S
6.5
6.3
11.0
7.0
5.5
3.6
S.S
S.5
PERCENT
RECOVERY
0.0
1.0
1.8
30.0
86.7
SS.3
100.0
113.3
10S.3
105.0
91.7
116.7
91.7
60,0
73.3
70.S
RECOVERY
DQO (%)
50-150
50-150
50-150
50- 1 50
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150 .
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
DQO
MET
No !
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes 1
Yes 1
Yes 1
Yes
Yes 1
Yes |
Yes
 Oilier ConVDou nds DC !cc(cd
 Dicthylphihalatc
 di-n-Butyjphdialaic
•bis(2-Ethylhcxyl)pluhab
-------
             TABLE C-l. SVOC RECOVERIES  FROM FILTERS (concluded)
                                  SAMPLE ID:  TF-2-1
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Acenaptuhylcnc
AccnapluJjcnc
Fluorcnc
Phenamhrcne
Anihmccnc.
Fhfornnihcne
Pyrc/ic
Chryscnc
Betuo(n)amhrncenc
Bcnzo(b)fluoramhcnc
Bcruo(k)fluoramhenc
Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
Indcnof 1 ,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibcnz(a,h)anihraccfic
Bcnio(g,h,i)pcr)')cnc
RTI
VALUE
a
-------
TABLE C-2. SVOC RECOVERIES FROM XAD-2 MODULES
            SAMPLE ID: XAD-50 RESULTS
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaphthylcnc
II Accn.iphihcnc
Fluorcnc
1 Phenamhrcnc
[Anthracene
JFluorantJicnc
Pyrcnc
IChryscnc
Bcnzo(a)amlirnccne
[jJ3cnzo(b)nuo.raiuhcnc
1 Bcnzo(k)ntioranthcnc
Bcnia(n)pyrcnc
]ndc"no(J,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibc!u(a,h)an(hrnccnc
Bcnzo(g,h,i)pcrylcnc
KTI
VALUE
(PS)
SO
160
SO
16
S
s
16
S
S
S
16
S
S
S
16
16 '
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(PS)
95,0
130,0
69.0
16.0
8.0
S.2
15.0
8.6
8.6
S.6
15.0
7S.5
7.6
5.9
13.0
12.0
PERCENT
RECOVERY
1SS.S
81.3
86.3
100.0
100.0
102.5
93.S
107.5
107.5
107.5
93.S '
106.3
95.0
73.S
SI.3
75.0
RECOVERY
DQO (%)
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150 .
50*150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
DQO
MET
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
.Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Other Compounds Detected
Phenol
2-Mcihylphcnol
4-McihyIphcnol
DimcLhylphtlulatc
DtcLhylpfuhaJaic
di'-n-Buiylphthalatc
BurylbcnzylphthaJntc
bis(2-Eihylhc.xy!)phihala(c

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

S.5
6.7
4.1
2.0
17.0
36.0
33.0
12.0
                                                 (coni.inued)
                       C-7
-------
TABLE C-2. SVOC RECOVERIES FROM XAD-2 MODULES (continued)
                    SAMPLE ID: XAD-51 RESULTS
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaphihylcnc
Accnnphthcnc
Fluorcnc
Pticnamhrcnc
Anthracene
Ruoraruhcnt
Pyrcnc
Chryscnc
Bcnzo(a)nmhrnccnc
Bcn2o(b)fluornn{hcnc
Bcnzo(k)fluoranihcnc
Bcnzo(a)pyrcne
!ndcno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibcnz(a,h)amhraccnc
Bcnzo(g,h(i)pcrylcnc
RTI
VALUE
(PS)
100
200
100
20
10
' 10
20
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
20
20
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(MS)
120.0
150.0
79,0
JS.O
9.2
9.6
1S.O
10.0
9.1
9.3
16.0
9.1
S.9
9.5
M.O
13,0
PERCENT
RECOVERY
120
75
79
90
92
96
90
!00
94
93
SO
91
S9
95
70
65
RECOVERY
DQO (%)
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50- 1 50
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
DQO
MET
Yes j
Yes
^Ycs 1
Yes I
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes I
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes I
Yes
Yes I
Other Compounds Detected
Phenol
2-McthyIphcnol
4-McthyI.phcnol
Dimcihylphthalatc
DicthylphUialnic
di-n-Buiylphthnlaic
bi5(2-Eihylhcxyt)pluha)aic
                             0
                             0
                             0
                             0
                             0
                             0
                             0
 6.6
 5.7
 3.4
 1.7
37.0
32.0
 7.6
                                                               (continued)
-------
        TABLE C-2.  SVOC RECOVERIES FROM XAD-2 MODULES (confmued)
                           SAMPLE ID;  XAD-52 RESULTS'
AiS'ALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaphthylcnc
Accnaphthcnc
Fluorcnc
Phcna/uhicnc
Aruluacene
Ruoranthcnc
Pyrcnc
Chryscnc
Bcfuo(a);\mhrnccnc
Bcruo(b)fluoramhcnc
Bcnzo(k)nuoramhcnc
Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
Indcno( 1 ,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibenz(a,h)an(hrncciic
Bcnzo(g,h,i)pcrylcnc
RTI
VALUE
(MS)
100
200
100
20
10
10
20
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
20
20
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(MS)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.2
3.5
16.0
9.3
10.0
11.0
1S.O
11.0
9.3
7.7
15,0
35.0
PERCENT
RECOVERY
0
0
0
0
32
35
SO
93
100
110
90
110
93
77
75
75
RECOVERY
DQO (%)
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150 .
50-150
50-150
50-150
DQO
MET
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Olhcr Compoiinds_Dclcctcd
DicLhylphthaJatc
dt-n-Dutylphihalatc
bis(2-E:hylhcxyl)phthaJa!c
0
0
0
 1.8
35.0
 9.3
                                                                       (continued)
   Rcponcd sample went 10 dryncss during the concentration stage.
                                       C-9
-------
TABLE C-2. SVOC RECOVERIES FROM XAD-2 MODULES (couuuucd)
                 SAMPLE ID: XAD-53 RESULTS
[
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnapluhylcnc
AccnaphOicnc
Fluorcnc
Phcnanthrcnc
Anthracene
Fluora/idicnc
Pyrcnc
Chryscnc
Bcnzo(n)nmhmccMc
Bcnio(b)fluor7mihcnc
Bcnzo(k)nuornnthcnc
Bcnzo(n)pyrcnc
Indaio(i,2,3.cd)pyrciic
Dibcri£(n,h)amh.raccnc
Bcnzo(gth,i)pcrylcnc
RTI
VALUE
(PS)
SO
160
so"
16
8
8
16
S
S
8
16
S
s •
8
16
16
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(MS)
110,0
140.0
72.0
16.0
7,3
7.6
14,0
8,5
8.1
8.9
16,0
6.9
7.6
9.6
14.0
.13.0
PERCENT
RECOVERY
137.5
87.5
90.0
1 00.0
91.3
95.0
87.5
106.3
101.3
111.3
100.0
S6.3
95.0
120.0
S7.5
S1.3
RECOVERY
OQO (%)
50-150
50-150
50- 1 50
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
DQO
MET
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Other Compounds Delected ,
Phenol
2-McLhylphcnol
4-Mcihylphcnol
DimcihyJpluhaJatc
DicthylphLhaJaic
di-n-Burylphihalatc
Buiylbcnzylplnhalaic
bis(2-EihyJlicxyl)phthalaic

0
0
,0
0
0
0
0
0

9.0
6.1
4.9
2.1
47.0
46.0
3.4
10.0
                                                      (continued)
                           C-lO
-------
        TABLE C-2.  SVOC RECOVERIES FROM XAD-2 MODULES (concluded)
                        SAMPLE ID; XAD-54 RESULTS (BLANK)
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
i Accnaphihylcnc
1 Accnaphihcnc
I Fluorcnc
—
Pbcnanih/cnc
Anihraccnc
I Fluonmihcnc
Pyrcnc
Chryscne
] Bcnto(a)anthraccnc
j| Bcnzx>(b}nuoranthcnc
Bcruo(k)fluoramhcnc
Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
Indcno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibcnz(a.h)an(hracenc
Bcnio(g,h,i)pcrylcnc
RTI
VALUE
(PS)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
AIR
TOXICS
VALUE
(PS)
61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PERCENT
RECOVERY
NA
HA
NA
•NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RECOVERY
OQO (%}
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DQO
MET
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Olher Compounds Dctccscd
Phenol
2-McihylphcriQl
4;Mcihylphc.not
Dimelhylphihalaic
di-n-Bulylphihala(c
BucytbcnzyiphthaJnie
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12.0
6.9
4.7
2.0
' N.O
53.0
6S.O
9.4
NA = Not Applicable
                                        C-ll
-------
TABLE C-3. SVOC FILTER RPDS (%)
ANALYTE
Jj Naphthalene
| Accnaphthylcnc
1 Accnaphthcnc
fl Fluorcnc
1 Phenanthrcne
1 AnihrDccnc
1 Fluorariihcnc
1 Pyrcnc
Jj Chryscne
^Bauo(a}amhraccne
: Bcnzo(b)nuoranihcnc
1 Bcnzo(k)nuonuuhcnc
Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
1 Indcno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcne
Dibcfli(a,ti)aniiirnccnc
Bcnzo(g,h(5)pcrylcnc
% RECOVERY
TF-22
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.2
70.0
65.0
" S3.3
9S.3
86.7
8S.3
70.0
SO.O
70.0
45.0
57.5
55.8
TF-23
0.0
1.0
1.8
"~30.6r'~
86.7
88.3
100.0
113.3
10S.3
J05.0
91.7
116.7
91.7
60.0
73.3
70. S

IPDs
(%)
NA
200.0
200.0
419"""
21.3
30.4
18.2
14.2
22.2
17.3
26.S
37.3
26.S
20.0
24.2
23.7
%RSD
DQO
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
DQO
MET
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
                                       (coniinued)
            C-12
-------
TABLE C-3. SVOC FILTER RPDS (%) (concluded)
1 ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaptuhylcnc
Acenaphthene
Fluorenc
1 Phcnomhrenc
Anthracene
Fluornruhcnc
Pyrenc
1 Chryscne
1 Bcnzo(n)amhrnccnc
jj Bcnzo(b)fkioramhenc
I Bcnzo(k)nuomiulicnc
| Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
jj Indcno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
1 Dibcnz(a,h)nnthrnccnc
Bcruo(g.h,i)pcrylcnc
% RECOVERY
TF-20
o.o
0.5
1.0
26.3
86.7
S6.7
103.3
120.0
113.3
113.3
96.7
106.7
. 100.0
73.3
S6.7
73.3
TF-24
0.0
0.6
1.2
28.0
86.7
86.7
1033
120.0
120,0
120.0
103.3
113.3
100.0
SO.O
S'6-7
S3.3

PDs
(%)
NA
1S.2
18.2
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.7
5.7
6.6
6.0
0.0
8.7
0.0
12.S
%RSD
DQO
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
DQO
MET
NA
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes ,
Yes
                  C-13
-------
TABLE C-4. XAD-2 MODULE RPDS (%)
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
I^Accnapluhylcnc
1 Accnaplnhcnc
rFluorcric^
1 Phcnamhrcnc
| Anthracene
Fiuoran'thcnc
Pyrcnc
| Chryscnc
| Bcnzo(a)nnthrnccnc
jj Bcnzo{b)fluonintlicnc
BctizQ(k)fUioramhcnc
Bcnzo(n)pyrcnc
I"dcno(l,2,3"Cd)pyrcnc
Diboiz(n,h)an(hraccnc
— 	 — 	
Bcnzo(g.h,i)pcrylcnc
% RECOVERY
XAD-50
118. S
SI. 3
S6.3
' 100,0 '
100.0
102.5
" 93. S
107.5
107.5
107.5
93.S
106,3
95.0 '
73.S
SI. 3
75.0
XAD-53
137.5
S7.5
90.0
100.0 ~
91.3
95.0
87.5
106.3
101.3
111. 3
100.0
S6.3
95.0
120.0
S7,5
81.3

RPDs
(%)
14,6
7.3
4,2
0.0
9.1
7.6
6.9
1.1
5.9
3.7
6.4
20.S
0.0
47.7
7.3
S.I
%RSD
DQO
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
DQO
MET
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
                                         (continued)
             CM 4
-------
TABLE C-4. XAD-2 MODULE RPDS (%) (concluded)
ANALYTE
Naphthalene
Accnaphthylcnc
Accnaphthenc
Fluorcnc
Phenanihrcne
Anthracene
Fluoranihcnc
Pyrcnc
Chryscnc
Bcnzo(a)anihn\ccnc
Bcnzo(b)nuoranthcnc
Bcn£o(k)fluonmilicnc
Bcnzo(3)pyrcnc
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrcne
Dibenz(a,h)amhmecnc
Bcntofg.h.ijpcrytcnc
% RECOVERY
TF-22
TF-23
120 0
75
79
90
92
96
90
100
94
93
SO
91
S9
95
70
65
0
0
0
32
35
80
93
100
110
' 90
110
93'
77
75
75

RPDs
(%)
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
96.8
93.1
n.s
7,3
6.2
16,7
n.s
IS. 9
4.4
20,9
6.9
14.2
%RSD
DQO
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
DQO
MET
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
                  C-15
-------
         TABLE C-5,  LEAD RECOVERIES AND PERCENT BIAS
SAMPL
E ID

QF7
QF8
QF9
QF 10
RTl
VALUE
(1115)
.060
.035
.060
.035
IEA VALUE
.015
.on
.019
.015
PGKCENT
RECOVERY'

41.7
-1S.6
31.7
•12.9
BIAS

-5S.3
-51. -f
-CS.3
, -57.1 .
D1AS
DQO
(%)
25
25
25
25 .
DQO
MET

No
No
No
. . No
              ICA conccmnhon -  known coiiccniahon
  ^Recovery -  	,—.—__	:	  >•
                      known coiJCcnirnuon
2 % Dias - Pcrccnl recovery  -  100
          TABLE C-6. LEAD PRECISION AND PERCENT RPD
DUPLICATE
ANALYSES
1
QF7
QP9
QF 8
QF 10
IEA
RECOVERIES

41.7
31.7
4S.6
42.9
RPD
i
(&)

27.2
12.5
RPD
DQO
(*>)

25
25
DQ
0
ME.
T
	 •" 	 	 	 	 .:
No
Yes
1   % RPD  =
    Dupiicnic  1  -  Duplicate 1

Mean of Duplicate 1  nnd Duplic.itc 2
                                                    ]QQ
                                C-16
-------
       APPENDIX D




TOTAL ION CHROMATOGRAMS
          D-l
-------
     Abundance
  SOOOOOO
 noooooo-
 I'oooooo
                10
                                    Rim BI03.-09 PMPST«nSirM«r OK. 1U53
                                     1
                                    20
                                        	i  	)  	i	r
    30

Time (mlnj
                        43
                                        TF4

                                       AGIO

                                      1/28/93
                                           50
                                           TIC oli03OCX»OICM'.'.
-------
                                           TIC«ISJ309l0010l0.d
                                   Run Hi 11 as TM PST on Tue Mir W, 1073
      Abundance
  •KTOOOOO
  :iOODOQ
 7000000
 icooooo
 •wooooo
:iooowo
ifOOOOOD
lootwoo-
             ll fl
             j v*J  v»
                 T
                 10
i	1	1	1
   20
                                                  Time (Kiln.)
                                  ll«m at I2.1Z AM PSr on Wed M.ir 10. 1993
                                                       TF7
                                                    Hut Blank
                                                     2/11/93
                                                                                       TF10
                                                                                    AC 10 Thin
                                                                                      2/18/93
                                                  Hint (mln.l
                                               D-3
-------
        Abundance




              AJi
             -—rt-Jss-K—.
                                Hun it OC.O3 PM PST on Tue Mar W. I3J3
                            .JLLJlU
                                20
                                                30
                                            lime JmlnJ
                                                                     TFII
                                                                  Field Blank
                                                                    2/18/93
               r—-^   ,_ ,      ,   j.  ,   ,   ,   ,   .,   ,   ,  r
                                                               to
                                                                              50
 •.'•
Sj.S-
     J  E
     X  a'
        1
     la

     -1
      !
r«JW»«J w
  i*>  is  «'»
                                                                            TFI3
                                                                         AGIO Thin
                                                                           2/25/93
                                                  <5  «  *
                                                                        M  «
                                                                                  «  «
                                       D-4
-------
                                                                         TF17

                                                                    AC10/RubbcrT7iin

                                                                         4/7/93
!.<•




I.I-
•-••  1  i
».»-
fi   ? s
a   s w
i   i"
11
£
5
I
i
*
i

Utei
»
•*


!

i.
s
I
f
Hut Blank

 4/14/93
   to  ii  15   11
                                       D-5
-------
                                                                      TF28
                                                                 AClO/RubberThin
                                                                     4/27/93
 » " w   i>  it  so  »  is   »  »»  a  »  »
i
«*
g"
i
•!
i
-8
«



li,
t
5
i
lf
\
i
*
~t
1 i
S r
] i
I i
•.
n





                                                                       TF29
                                                                     Hut Blank
                                                                       5/7/93
                                     D-6
-------
                                  TF32
                            AClO/RubbcrThin
                                 5/24/93
                                   TF33
                                 Field Blank
                                  5/24/93
D-7
-------
       Abunrtaner
   tlOOciOR
  7,OOc.OB
                                 Hun nt 0-W TM TST an S*« Mjr DC. 1373
                                                  30
                                               Ihne (mlr>J
   XAD3
ACJ07T,ick
   1/28/93
                                                        ;, ITO3
0,OOr.W
                                                                               XAD6
                                                                             AC 10 Thin
                                                                               2/4/93
                                         D-8
-------
                                   IICalSQ3«I0yO
                                            30
                                         Time (mtnj
                                                           10
                                                                       XADS
                                                                      Hut Blank
                                                                       2/11/93
                                                                     XAD9
                                                                   AC 10 Thin
                                                                    2/18/93
                             »t an.iM TM rsr on SBI M,V OR, tan
                                       Time (mln.)
                                   D-9
-------
 .1

 ..1

 i.l

 i.l;
 *•*!

 *•':
 *•*!

 j.ij
 15.
 J.j;

 i,i;
*•';
i.ij
i.jj
i.li
  UJiH
ilM
 »-J  fj
K 1
s: S
m S.J.M P
Jfil!^i!ii
                                                         XAD12
                                                       AC !0 Thin
                                                         2/25/93
                             v	L
                                Ka
                                     «  4i  w 17  si a  u  u u  a it  n
                                                        XAD16
                                                    AClO/RubbcrThin
                                                        4/7/93
                               "in
                            D-10
-------
                                                                        XAD1S
                                                                       Hut Blank
                                                                        4/N/93
                                   1
                                   I
 SO  11  15   1»  W  Tl  B  3»  JO  »  »  9   <»
	Hn
                                                                       XAD27
                                                                  ACIO/RubberThin
                                                                       4/27/93
                                                                 10  u  ts   u   »  n
                                   D-ll
-------
                                 XAD3I
                            ACHVRubbcrThin
                                 5/24/93
D-12
-------
                                          APPENDIX E




                              STANDARDS ADDITION ANALYSIS









 Introduction




        The method of standard additions is a well-known technique for counteracting interfering




 matrix effects (see for example'Skoog, D,A. "Principles of Instrumental Analysis", 3rd Ed.




 Philadelphia; Saunders  College Publishing, 1985 P2IO, and Bader, M "A Systematic Approach to




 Standard Addition Methods in Instrumental Analysis", Journal of Chemical Education, 57(10):703-6,




 1980), Because, as discussed in Section 4,9 of the text, concerns regarding interferences were not




 completely ameliorated by the use of the selected ion monitoring technique, il was decided to further




 investigate the possibility of interferences using a brief standards additions experiment.




 Methodology




      , Unfortunately, limited project resources constrained this experiment in scope to the reanalysis




 of one sample (TF5) selected because it appeared to have a typically severe chromatographic




 resolution problem in the full-scan data set.  The standards addition methodology was modeled after




 Bader's Case 5;  Variable Total Volume  with Continuous Variation of the Standard.  Multiple 50 uL




aliquots of sample TF5  wete withdrawn from the  final analytical volume of S mL, These aliquots




were then treated with 0, 1,2, 5, 25, 200 pL additions of a standard containing 5 ng/uL of the 16




PAH species listed in Table E-l,  The mixtures thus generated were then analyzed using  the selected




ion monitoring method described in Section 2.10,2,  Quantification in this instance was based not on




the isotope dilution  method (in which responses are quantified based on the ratio of the integrated area




                                              E-l
-------
  of the analyte to the integrated area of a isotopically labeled internal standard) but on the standards


  additions calculations as presented by Bader (using the integrated area counts  of [he analyte as the


  instrument response).  Using Barter's method the quantity (Vx + N *  Vs) *  Rn was ploued vs. N (Vx


  is the fixed unit volume of the  unknown, N is a integer denoting how many increments of standard
                         *

  have been added to the mixture, Vs is the  fixed unit volume of the standard and Rn is the instrument


  response.)  A linear regression was then performed and the  concentration of the analyie Cx was then


  determined from the equation Cx = b * Vs * Cs/(m *  Vx), (b is the intercept and m is the slope of the


  regressed line, and Cs  is  the stock concentration of the standard).  Unfortunately n computer failure


  resulted in  the loss of data from the 25 and 200 uL additions.


  Results and Discussion        • ••


        The results calculated using the remaining four points are shown in Table E-l, The quality of


 the regression fit obtained was highly variable (r = 0.412 - 0.99),  This variability could  in pan be


 attributed to the fact  that  the addition of small amounts of standard  had  little impact on the


 concentration  of compounds whose concentrations were high in sample TF5.  Under these conditions a


 regression of a function of instrument response versus  the number of increments of standard added


 would have a  shallow slope and thus would be subject to analytical variability.  The lost data, if


 available, would have made the standards additions analysis of some compounds less subject to this


 problem.  However this reasoning does not explain all  the nonlinear results observed since poor


 linearity is observed for some compounds (such as Anthracene) that appear to be in low concentration.


 The instances of non-linearity appear to be  clustered  in a elution order range from Phenanthrene to


 Chrysene (and especially from Phenanthrene to Pyrene) which corresponds to the middle of the


 unresolved peak seen on the sample chromatograms (see Appendix D).


        When values derived using this SIM -  standards additions approach are compared  to values


obtained using the SIM  - isotope dilution approach, generally good agreement is found in  the


"fingerprint" of the concentrations of the various PAH species (Table E-l and Figure E-l). Not



                                              E-2
-------
 surprisingly, the agreement of concentrations appears to be worse in compounds with poor linearity in




 the standards additions experiment.  The instances of poor agreement nlso appear to be clustered in a




 elmion order range from Phenamhrene to Chrysene which corresponds to the middle oF the unresolved




 peak seen on the sample chromatograms (see Appendix D),




                       TABLE E-l.  STANDARDS ADDITIONS RESULTS

Naphthalene
Accnaphihylcnc
Accnnphthcnc
Fluorcnc
Phenamhrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrcnc
Bcnzo(a)anthraccn<:
Chryscnc
Bcnzo(b)fluoranthcne
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bcnzo(a)pyrenc
indcno ( 1 ,2,3-cd)pyrcnc
Dibcnzo(a,h)onihraccnc
Bcn7.o(g,h,i)pcrylcnc
Constant
2373618
906506
803093
1213290
34491996
6480584
53833071
50571298
17110501
61153753
352080
18788542
6499156
2503304
2716415
3383863
X Coefficient
UI3101
1226751
866786
903425
2593430
931213
3865922
3538935
2926126
2894878
959287
1564003
977314
687436
600465
568627
Ri
0.84!
0.922
0.900
0.907
0.617
0.412
0.450
0.582
0.968
0.791
0.916
0.993
0.896
0.926
0.855
0.916
SIM • Standards
Additions Calculated
Concentration
(ug/santplc)
0.2)
0.07
0.09
0.13
1.33
0.70
1.44
1.43
0.5S
2.11
0.04
1.20
0.67
0.36
0.45
0.60
SIM (isotope dilution)
Calculated
Concentration
(uc/snmplc)
0.11
<0.05
<0.05
0.05
2.93
0.36
3.7
3.26
1.75
7.99
<0.05
1.77
Q.75
0.25
0.32
0.36
Conclusion




       This analysis would suggest that although the standards additions analysis generally supports




the results of the isotope dilution analysis the presence of these unresolved interfering compounds  may
                                             E-3
-------
still be causing inaccuracies in the quantitation of a subset of the PAHs of interest.  Some form of

cleanup or fractionation chromaiography may be necessary as n pan of the analysis for these species in

future work svtth paniculate derived from asphalt sources.
                           0
 o
 Q.

 O
 O
         ^Naphthalene
        Acenapnthytene
          Acenaphthene
               Fluorene
          Phenanfhrene
             Anthracene
           Fluoranthene
                Pyrene
    Benzo(a)artthraeene
              Chrysene
   Benzo(b)fiuoranthene
   Benzo(k)fluoranthene
        Ben2o(a)pyrene
 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Diben2o(a,h)anthracene
    Ben2o(g,h,i)perytene
                            r
                            i
                                             Amount (ug/sample)

                                                  4             6
                                   SIM - Standards Add
                                                          {£A$| SIM (Isotope Oil.)
                      Figure E-1.  Comparison of SIM standards addition
                          '(and  SIM isotope dilution sample TF5),
                                           E-4
-------
  " - •','




                             '        ~
                                                                                           "TSpSrvl



                               •
                             k*BfcD5fi£@?i
                                                                  m?'SSWISS3rSL*'K4'^»i ft%,  fiSS3?" ^"iMsJ (FSJSUJ©?" u©©0& tliSB" CiS Hi*? *M|r5i^aa^
.                     StS-It        gg
                                   ^-5      was         a^iit^^ti-
                     ^J^pSaMs^'  ,
                                                            -%n>1
!
         '


-------