NEW YORK: SUFFOLK COUNTY, LONG ISLAND

County and state legislature, and stakeholders

combine Transfer of Development Rights, general

obligation municipal bonds, sales tax revenue and real

estate transfer tax revenue to preserve land in core

preservation area.


Background

Located at the eastern two-thirds of Long Island, Suffolk County runs from population densities
of 4,000 persons per square mile on the west end near NYC to 200 per square mile in the
agricultural east end, still the number one farming county in the State for market revenue. In
between lies New York State's third largest preservation area: the 100,000 acre Central Pine
Barrens, under which lies the island's largest supply of fresh drinking water (120 trillion gallons).
The Suffolk County Water Authority (www.scwa.com) is the nation's second largest ground
water supplier; serving 1.2 million residents from this federally designated sole source aquifer.
Heavy development in the aquifer recharge area led to concern about damage to this sensitive
and unique ecosystem and the threat of nonpoint source pollution seeping into the ground
water.

In response to this concern, in 1987, voters overwhelmingly approved by referendum, the use of
one quarter of one percent of the sales tax to purchase critical watershed areas through a new
Drinking Water Protection Program. As part of this program, the county acquires lands in
mapped and designated Special Ground water Protection Areas (SGPA's) most likely to have
an impact on existing or future drinking water supplies. The continued availability of these sales
tax funds have attracted matching funds from the federal, state (including Clean Water
Revolving Funds), and local governments and allowed future revenue streams to be pledged for
debt service to amass larger qualities of money as needed over the years.

The Suffolk County Water Authority has received the 2006 Exemplary Source Water
Protection Award from the American Water Works Association (AWWA).

Primary Contamination Threat

The primary contamination threat is from heavy development and nonpoint source pollution.

Local Involvement  and Developing the Protection  Plan

Wearied and battered by protracted lawsuits pitting preservationists against developers, litigants
joined the Suffolk County  Water Authority (SCWA), the Regional Plan Association and regional
and state government in 1993 to plan a future for the 100,000-acre Central Pine Barrens.
Located 75 miles east of Manhattan, the "poor, scrubby land of indifferent quality", as George
Washington once described it, had, by the 1980's, become the last frontier for suburban sprawl,
stretching from 1950's Levittown east to Suffolk County, an area which today has a population
of 2.5 million people. The  real estate community viewed the Pine Barrens as the sorry-looking
Office of Water (4606M)                    816F10035                           January 2010

-------
void between a vital city/suburb and the world-class destinations of the Hamptons, Montauk and
Fire Island. Preservationists viewed it as the last untouched open space and forest preserve,
home to numerous endangered species of plants and animals, including a globally rare
ecosystem, known as the Dwarf Pine Plains. "Pushing and shoving" ensued through the 1980's
with plenty of posturing and fear mongering intended to win the hearts and minds of the citizenry
and the local governments who oversaw zoning, planning and development.

Finally, all the feuding parties agreed to plan and build on the 1987 Drinking Water Protection
Program. The 1993 planning principles adopted by the State Legislature in the Long Island Pine
Barrens Protection Act allowed for compact, orderly development in compatible growth areas,
and simultaneously designated a no-development zone mapped as a core preservation area.
The Central Pine Barrens Plan (Plan) was framed as the best way to preserve what, in fact, is a
watershed and drinking water preserve for present and future generations. The State mandated
goals, interim development standards, a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) procedure, and
a mapped no-development zone of 50,000 acres and told everyone they had two years to adopt
the Plan or else it was back to the battle of the lawyers.

Feverish work commenced which was guided by a professional watershed planning group on
loan from the SCWA. The labor was  divided and numerous working  committees were created to
flesh out the Plan, develop requirements for hardships, create a mechanism for transferring
development rights from the protection area to designated growth areas, and sort out
jurisdictional matters. The legal cement binding the towns to the Plan was the assumption of all
Plan-related liability by the State of New York, especially with respect to the strict prohibitions on
development in what has now become the third largest preserve in New York State behind the
Adirondacks and the Catskills.

Management Measures

The Plan was adopted by all the governmental entities in 1995 and contains a variety of
management measures to control growth and development. Land uses in  the Core Preservation
Area (Core) are severely limited  and must be approved by the Central Pine Barrens Joint
Planning and Policy Commission (CPBJPPC) (www.pb.state.ny.us), made up of the affected
governmental entities (the State, Suffolk County, and three townships). Land uses in the
Compatible Growth Area (CGA)  must be in  accordance with the adopted Plan  and are
implemented locally through conforming zoning codes and planning ordinances. These local
laws must correspond to common development standards and best  management practices
(BMP's). More recently, the CPBJPPC has developed management guidelines for stewardship
for the purposes of managing the land and its ecosystems for the preservation of habitat on the
surface and the ground water beneath. Sources of management funding include first instance
funding by the SCWA of staff costs for the CPBJPPC with eventual reimbursement of most
costs by the State, and designation of portions of the Drinking Water Program  sales tax revenue
for County Parks Department management and stewardship. Numerous volunteer and oversight
efforts by the Long Island Pine Barrens Society (www.pinebarrens.org) and The Nature
Conservancy (www.tnc.org) help to complement the government-sponsored management
regulations.

The Plan creates both a Protected Lands Council, made up of the public landholders in the Core
Preservation Area, and a Law Enforcement_Council (LEG). The former coordinates the actions
of the natural resources and parks staff that have daily management responsibilities, while the
latter_oversees the continued security and protection of the habitat. Some of the LEG members
Office of Water (4606M)                        816F10035                             January 2010

-------
have enforcement powers, specifically granted by the State Legislature, to guard against illegal
dumping and waste disposal or other activities, which might be injurious to the drinking water
supply or sensitive habitats. Due to the large extent of the Central Pine Barrens, the area has
historically been prone to wildfire. Contingency plans include a Wildfire Task Force and
Management Plan, which involves all the local fire departments, and regional fire and
emergency services personnel. Annual training is provided at a Fire Academy. The Nature
Conservancy also sponsors "prescribed burning" to intentionally cut down on fuel loads on the
forest floor. The SCWA participates in many of these activities in order to protect and enhance
the drinking water supply for existing and future customers.

Contingency Planning
Measuring Program Effectiveness

In 2005, at the ten-year mark of the Plan's adoption, numerous aspects of the Plan were
revisited to gauge effectiveness. Was the requisite amount of land preserved in the Core over
the decade? Did development pan out as proposed in the Compatible Growth Area?  The key to
measuring effectiveness in the Central Pine Barrens does NOT lie with the government. These
entities are political by their very nature and are prone to overlook any problems with
enforcement, stewardship, or plan implementation. Rather, it has been private entities from the
civic, recreation, environmental, and scientific communities that have successfully monitored
Plan implementation,  land protection, acquisition, stewardship, and development. The SCWA
can readily compare raw water quality in the Pine Barrens with water quality elsewhere to show
the benefits of source water protection. The SCWA also funds continuing public education about
the effectiveness of the Pine Barrens Plan and the importance of the watershed and also funds
scientific research on  a variety of ground water issues. Local civic groups, recreation and open
space user groups have complemented the efforts to measure program effectiveness through
tireless monitoring, advocacy, media alerts, and sheer pestering. The structural source for
measuring program effectiveness is the collaborative technique used in the two- year
preparation of the Central  Pine Barrens Plan. Because of the "sunset provision" mandate  of the
State Legislature, the  Plan had to be created and adopted by all parties in two years time  or
else the legislation would "self-destruct". Over 350 people and the groups they represented
actively participated in the Plan preparation to get the job done on time and have remained to
this day to make sure  their work amounts to something real and satisfying.

For further information, contact:
Stephen M. Jones, CEO
Suffolk County Water  Authority
(631)563-0219
siones@scwa.com

Raymond Corwin, Executive Director
Central Pine Barrens Joint Planning and Policy Commission
(631)224-2604
rcorwin@pb. state, ny. us
Office of Water (4606M)                        816F10035                              January 2010

-------