Great
 Lakes
 National
 Program
On the Web at:
www.epa.gov/greatlakes
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO)
Significant Activities Report

      January 2005
 IN THIS ISSUE:
 • Great Lakes Regional Collabora-
  tion Rolls Ahead
 • Caribbean Mercury Workshop
 • Burn-it-Smart
 • Conserving Bald Eagle Habitat
 • Sediment Cleanup Planning
 .   Waukegan Harbor AOC
 .   Ash tabula River AOC
 .   Maumee River AOC
 .   Muskegon Lake AOC
Great Lakes Regional Collabora-
tion Rolls Ahead
As mentioned in the previous issue of the
Significant Activities Report, the
"Northbound Train" is rolling! The Great
Lakes Regional Collaboration Conveners
met in Chicago on December 3rd, 2004 in
Chicago, Illinois. At that meeting, the Con-
veners signed the "Great Lakes Declara-
tion" and "Framework" documents affirm-
ing the commitment to the Great Lakes Re-
gional Collaboration process and the devel-
opment of a comprehensive strategy to fur-
ther protect and restore the Great Lakes.

The "Framework" document established
eight Issue Area Strategy Teams comprised
of government, quasi-government, regional
stakeholders, and other interested parties, as
the working bodies responsible for drafting
action plans that will be used for the devel-
opment of the Great Lakes Strategy. The
eight Strategy Teams include:
                Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich speaks at Great
               Lakes Regional Collaboration Conveners Meeting in
                      Chicago on December 3, 2004.

              •  Habitat/Species
              •  Indicators and Information
              •  Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxics Re-
                 duction
              •  Invasive Species
              •  Sustainable Development
              •  Coastal Health
              •  Non-point Source
              •  Areas of Concern Restoration/
                 Remediation

              The Teams quickly swung into action imme-
              diately following the Conveners Meeting and
              have been working hard on drafting Strategy
              pieces for their particular issue area through
              extensive use of conference calls, email, and
              specially-established collaboration Web
              Sites. A face-to-face working meeting of the
              Executive Committee's subcommittee and
              the Strategy Teams was held February 22nd
              and 23rd in Toledo, Ohio. The completed

-------
January 2005
                   Significant Activities Report
         draft strategy document is scheduled for
         presentation to the members of the Great
         Lakes Regional Collaboration, and ready
         for public review and comment, at Summit
         I, scheduled for July 7th and 8th in Duluth,
         Minnesota.

         For more information about the Great Lakes
         Regional Collaboration, visit: http://www.
         epa.gov/greatlakes/collaboration/index.html

         (Contact: Vicki Thomas, 312-886-6942,
         thomas.vicki@epa.gov)

         Caribbean Mercury Workshop
         On January 18th to 21st, Alexis Cain at-
         tended a United Nations Environment Pro-
         gram (UNEP) Mercury Awareness-Raising
         Workshop in Port of Spain, Trinidad and
         Tobago. This meeting was for the non-
         Spanish-speaking Caribbean countries, at-
         tended by approximately 50 staff of local
         governments. Other participants included
         representatives of USEPA's Office of Wa-
         ter, the Commission for Environmental Co-
         operation (U.S./Canada/Mexico) and the
         Mercury Policy Project/Ban Mercury Work-
         ing Group, as well as UNEP staff and stu-
         dents from the University of the West Indes.
         Alexis gave four presentations at the work-
         shop:
         •  Mercury sources and emissions
         •  Mercury in products
         •  Measures to limit mercury releases from
            wastes
         •  Measures to reduce releases from chlor-
            alkali plants
         With respect to mercury, the countries of
         the region can be divided into 3 groups:

         1.  Guyana and Suriname: These countries
            have more in  common with South
            America than they do with the Carib-
            bean island countries, because their pri-
            mary mercury problems result from ar-
 Bauxite ore (pictured) contains small amounts of mer-
 cury which can be released into the environment dur-
            ing mining and refining
            Photo courtesy of USGS

    tisanal gold mining. In both cases, min-
    ing takes place in the interior of the
    country, and is conducted primarily by
    people who live in the coastal areas of
    the country, but who set up camp tem-
    porarily in the interior to mine, causing
    mercury accumulation that affects the
    indigenous populations of the interior.
    In addition, both countries have bauxite
    mining.
 2.  Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Barba-
    dos:  These countries do not have ar-
    tisanal mining, but do have some heavy
    industry. All three have cement produc-
    tion.  Jamaica mines bauxite and pro-
    duces alumina, and Trinidad and To-
    bago produces oil and gas.
 3.  Members of the Organization of Eastern
    Caribbean States, the Bahamas, Belize:
    These countries have little industry and
    mining.  Mercury problems are associ-
    ated  primarily with imported products,
    and with disposal of municipal and hos-
    pital  waste.

 There was general uncertainty about how
 important an issue mercury is for the region.
 None of the countries have done emissions
 inventories, and data on mercury exposures
Page 2
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office

-------
 Significant Activities Report
                                  January 2005
        or levels in biota and environmental media
        are very limited. The exception is that Guy-
        ana and Suriname both have collected sub-
        stantial amounts of information about the
        artisanal gold mining issue, and have found
        high levels of mercury in fish near mining
        sites, and high exposures to miners, their
        families, and nearby fish-eating popula-
        tions.

        (Contact: Alexis Cain, 312-886-7018, cain.
        alexis@epa.gov)

        Burn-it-Smart
        USEPA invited Environment Canada to de-
        liver a "Burn it Smart" wood heat workshop
        in Watertown, New York on January 24th.
        "Burn-it Smart" workshops provide impor-
        tant information on the proper use of wood
        stoves and fireplaces, including selection of
        high-efficiency wood stoves as well as
        proper burning practices to reduce emis-
        sions and to conserve energy. The workshop
        was held as part of a public education cam-
        paign on residential wood combustion and
        includes the use of an outdoor burn trailer.
        The trailer contains two woodstoves
        mounted to the floor of the trailer. One
        stove is an old technology stove and the
        second is a USEPA-certified, advanced
        technology appliance and the display is
        used to demonstrate the difference in wood
        smoke emissions from the two units. These
        workshops are an effective educational tool
        to help reduce fine paniculate and hazard-
        ous emissions from wood smoke.

        (Contact: Steve Rosenthal, 312-886-6052,
        rosenthal.steve@epa.gov)

        Conserving Bald  Eagle Habitat
        The U.S.-Canada Bald Eagle Working
        Group, a Lake Ontario Lake Wide Manage-
        ment Plan (LaMP) working group, has
        drafted "Conserving Lake Ontario and Up-
     Illustration of a high-efficiency wood stove
   Image courtesy of Natural Resources Canada

per St. Lawrence River Bald Eagle Habi-
tats." The group came together to prioritize
bald eagle habitat, develop improved LaMP
bald eagle restoration goals and objectives,
identify opportunities for increased bina-
tional cooperation, and prioritize activities
and conservation tools for future funding
and implementation. Three parameters that
can serve as predictors of high quality bald
eagle nesting and foraging habitat were in-
corporated into an ArcGIS model. Forty-
one sites were identified that met the re-
quirements. Based on the results, the group
has proposed three recommendations for
LaMP ecosystem protection and restoration
goals:
1.   At least five priority sites in each of the
    U.S. and Canada should be protected
    and ten  active nests established in these
    areas within ten years.
2.   At least 12,000 acres of bald eagle habi-
    tat should be protected within ten years.
3.   An average of 80 percent of nesting
    pairs should be successful at a produc-
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
                                          Page3

-------
January 2005
                  Significant Activities Report
                        Bald eagle
           Photo courtesy of U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service

            tivity of at least 1.0 young each year for
            existing and new nests. The group will
            develop a list of recommendations for
            resource and coordination needs at a
            summer 2005 meeting.

         (Contact: FredLuckey, 212-637-3853,
         luckey.frederick@epa.gov)

         Sediment Cleanup Planning
         Waukegan Harbor AOC
         From January 4th through January 12th
         GLNPO, USEPA Region 5 Superfund, and
         their contractor CH2M Hill collected 63
         sediment cores in Waukegan Harbor, Illi-
         nois. The purpose of the  GLNPO-funded
         sampling was to  more  fully delineate the
         horizontal and vertical extent of PCB con-
         tamination in harbor sediments, and to col-
 lect geotechnical and physical data to in-
 form remedial design work. USEPA's
 FIELDS group will utilize the PCB data to
 develop concentration contours for volume
 and cost estimation. GLNPO continues to
 coordinate with Illinois EPA, USEPA Re-
 gion 5 Superfund, the U.S. Army Corps of
 Engineers, and other state and local stake-
 holders to develop a plan and funding strat-
 egy for addressing the contaminated sedi-
 ments in Waukegan Harbor.

 (Contact: Scott Cieniawski; 312-353-9184,
 cieniawski.scott@epa.gov).

 Ashtabula River AOC
 GLNPO's Scott Cieniawski hosted an Ash-
 tabula River planning meeting on January
 25th to discuss remaining technical issues
 regarding the Ashtabula River Cleanup pro-
 ject that was submitted for potential Great
 Lakes Legacy Act funding under the
 FY2004  Request for Projects. Members of
 the Legacy Act technical review committee
 (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ad-
 ministration, USEPA Region 5  Superfund
 and Office of Regional Council, the U.S.
 Fish and Wildlife Service, and GLNPO)
 were joined by representatives from the U.
 S. Army Corps of Engineers - Buffalo Dis-
 trict, the Ashtabula River Cooperation
 Group II, the Ashtabula River Partnership,
 and the Ohio EPA. The general consensus
 of the group was that there are no insur-
 mountable technical hurdles,  although addi-
 tional work needs to be performed regard-
 ing a potential residual cover layer, site res-
 toration activities, and the vertical and hori-
 zontal extent of dredging. The group also
 discussed possible funding options and
 technical responsibilities for completing the
 additional work in order to prepare the site
 for potential GLLA funding in FY2006.

 (Contact: Scott Cieniawski, 312-353-9184,
Page 4
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office

-------
 Significant Activities Report
                                 January 2005
        cieniawski.scott@epa.gov)

        Maumee River AOC
        On January 19th, the Ottawa River Great
        Lakes Legacy Act sediment remediation
        project team convened via conference call
        to discuss the sampling plan GLNPO
        drafted for the delineation of the remedial
        target area boundaries and the investigation
        of possible continuing sources of contami-
        nation. The Ottawa River is part of the
        Maumee River Area of Concern. The City
        of Toledo submitted a Legacy Act project
        proposal to USEPA, and this sampling plan
        addresses the next steps that need to be
        taken before a remediation project can begin
        in the Ottawa River. Participants included
        representatives from GLNPO, the City of
        Toledo, Ohio EPA, the Toledo Metropolitan
        Council of Governments, Hull & Associ-
        ates, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife  Service.
        The outcome of the call is that GLNPO will
        further revise the sampling plan based on
        the group's comments.  The USEPA Super-
        fund FIELDS Team will conduct the bathy-
        metric and sediment thickness surveys in
        early April 2005 with the sediment sam-
        pling survey scheduled for late Spring.

        (Contact: Mary Beth G. Ross, 312-886-
        2253, ross.marybeth@epa.gov)

        Muskegon Lake AOC
        On January 20th and 21st, Marc Tuchman
        and Mary Beth G. Ross attended a meeting
        in Muskegon, Michigan for the Ruddiman
        Creek Legacy Act proj ect. Ruddiman
        Creek, part of the Muskegon Lake Area of
        Concern is an urban waterway heavily con-
        taminated with PCB, PAHs, and heavy met-
        als. The Michigan Department of Environ-
        mental Quality (DEQ) has submitted a Leg-
        acy Act project proposal to USEPA  for the
        remediation of contaminated sediments in
        Ruddiman Creek. The meeting was con-
  A tank farm on the shores of Muskegon Lake, Ml

vened to review the proposed design and
plans and specs as developed by the Michi-
gan DEQ's contractor. The group also
walked the site. Participants included repre-
sentatives from GLNPO, USEPA Super-
fund, MDEQ, Army Corp of Engineers,
City of Muskegon, Muskegon Lake Public
Advisory Council, Grand Valley State Uni-
versity, the County Drain Commissioner,
Earth Tech, and Environmental Quality
Management, Inc.
(Contact: Marc Tuchman, 312-353-1369,
tuchman.marc@epa.gov)
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
                                        PageS

-------
January 2005
                 Significant Activities Report
                                                         Upcoming Events
                                                 April 22

                                                 May 1711
                                                 May 23rd-27th
                                                 July 7th and 8t!
                  2005

               Earth Day

               Great Lakes Binational
               Toxics Strategy Stakeholder
               Forum, Toronto, ON Canada

               Conference on Great Lakes
               Research, Ann Arbor, MI

               Great Lakes Regional Col-
               laboration Summit I, Duluth,
               Minnesota
                                                 We welcome your questions, comments or
                                                 suggestions about this month's Significant
                                                 Activities Report. To be added to or re-
                                                 moved from the Email distribution of the
                                                 Significant Activities Report, please contact
                                                 Tony Kizlauskas, 312-353-8773,
                                                 kizlauskas.anthony@epa.gov.
Page 6
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office

-------