BASELINE ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SMELTING & REFINING SITE
TOOELE COUNTY, UTAH
January 3, 2005
Prepared for the:
USEPA, Region VIII
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202
Prepared by:
Syracuse Research Corporation
Environmental Science Center - Denver
999 18th Street, Suite 1975
Denver, CO 80202
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Purpose 1
1.2 Methods 1
1.3 Organization 1
2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION 3
2.1 Site Location 3_
2.2 Site History 3
2.3 Environmental Setting 4
2.3.7 Aquatic Environment 4
2.3.2 Terrestrial Environment 5.
2.3.3 Wildlife 6
2.4 Basis for Concern 7
3 DATA SUMMARY AND EVALUATION 8
3.1 Data Classification and Grouping £
3.7.7 Work Areas (WAs) 8
3.7.2 Areas of Concern (AOCs) £
3.2 Data Used in the SLERA 9
3.3 Data Collected in Support of the Baseline ERA 9
3.4 Summary Statistics for Environmental Media 9
4 PROBLEM FORMULATION 10
4.1 Summary of the Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLERA) K)
4.2 Site Conceptual Model for the Baseline ERA 11
¥.2.7 Aquatic Receptors 12
¥.2.2 Plants and Soil Organisms 13.
¥.2.3 Birds and Mammals 13.
4.2.4 Amphibians and Reptiles 13
4.3 Ecological Management Goals 14
4.4 Assessment and Measurement Endpoints 15.
4.4.1 Hazard Quotients \6_
4.4.2 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests j/7
¥.¥.3 Population and Community Demographic Observations j_8
¥.¥.¥ Weight of Evidence Evaluation j_8
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
5 RISK EVALUATION FOR AQUATIC RECEPTORS 19
5.1 Direct Contact with Surface Water 19
5.2 Direct Contact with Sediment 20
5.2.7 HQ Evaluation Based on Bulk Sediment Benchmarks 20
5.2.2 SEM/AVS Evaluation 21
5.2.3 Sediment Porewater Evaluation 22
5.3 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests 24
5.4 Population and Community Demographic Observations 24
5.5 Weight of Evidence Summary 25.
6 RISK EVALUATION FOR TERRESTRIAL RECEPTORS 27
6.1 Predictive Approach 27
6.7.7 HQ Evaluation Based on Bulk Soil Benchmarks 27
6.7.2 Other Predictive Models 27
6.2 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests 28
6.3 Population and Community Demographic Observations 2J5
6.3.1 Terrestrial Plants in Non-AOC Locations 2J5
6.3.2 Terrestrial Plants in AOC Locations 32
6.3.3 Terrestrial Invertebrates and Soil Organisms 33.
6.4 Weight of Evidence Summary 33.
7 RISK EVALUATION FOR WILDLIFE RECEPTORS 35
7.1 HQ Approach 35
7.7.7 Basic Equation 35.
7.1.2 Exposure Assessment 3J5
7.7.3 Toxicity Assessment 4J_
7.1.4 Risk Characterization for Non-AOCs 43.
7.7.5 Risk Characterization for AOCs 46
7.2 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests 46
7.3 Population and Community Demographic Observations 46
7.4 Weight of Evidence Summary 46
8 UNCERTAINTIES 49
8.1 Uncertainties in Nature and Extent of Contamination 49
8.1.1 Representativeness of Samples Collected 49
5.7.2 Accuracy of Analytical Measurements 49
8.2 Uncertainties in Exposure Assessment 50
8.2.1 Pathways Not Evaluated 50
5.2.2 Chemicals Not Detected 5J_
5.2.3 Exposure Area Concentration Values 5J_
8.2.4 Wildlife Exposure Factors 52
January 3, 2005 ii
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
5.2.5 Absorption From Ingested Doses 52
8.3 Uncertainties in Toxicity Assessment 53.
8.3.1 Representativeness of Receptors Evaluated 53.
8.3.2 Absence of Toxicity Data for Some Chemicals 53.
8.3.3 Extrapolation of Toxicity Data Between Receptors 53.
8.3.4 Extrapolation of Toxicity Data Across Dose or Duration 54
8.3.5 Extrapolation of Toxicity Data from Laboratory to Field Conditions . . 54
8.4 Uncertainties in Risk Characterization 54
8.4.1 Interactions Among Chemicals 54
8.4.2 Estimation of Population-Level Impacts 55.
8.5 Summary of Uncertainties 55.
REFERENCES 56
APPENDICES
A Results of the 2003 Field Investigation to Support Ecological Risk Assessment
B Summary Statistics for Environmental Media by Work Area
C Selection of Toxicity Benchmarks and Wildlife Toxicity Reference Values
D Detailed Plant Community Data
E Plant Community Correlations with Bulk Soil and Nutrient Concentrations
F Wildlife Exposure Factors
G Measured Tissue Correlations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
H Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations for Environmental Media in Non-AOC and AOC
Locations
I Detailed Wildlife Risk Calculations for Non-AOC Locations (HQ Types A, B, C, and D)
J Detailed Wildlife Risk Calculations for AOC Locations (HQ Types A, B, C, and D)
January 3, 2005 iii
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
LIST OF FIGURES
1-1 Site Location Map
1-2 Eight Step Process for Ecological Risk Assessment at Superfund Sites
2-1 Site Location and Features Map
2-2 Terrestrial Vegetation Zones Within the IS&R Site Boundaries
3-1 Boundaries of Site Work Areas (WAs)
3-2 2003 Field Investigation Sampling Locations
4-1 Site Conceptual Model for Ecological Exposure
4-2 Conceptual Approach for Characterizing Population-Level Risks
5-1 Schematic Maps of Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Locations in Pine Creek and
at the Run-Off Ponds
6-1 Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations of Arsenic
6-2 Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations of Iron
7-1 Exposure Pathways Contributing Most to Predicted Risks for the Deer Mouse in
Non-AOCs
January 3, 2005 iv
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
LIST OF TABLES
2-1 Timeline of Mining, Reclamation, and Regulatory Activities
2-2 Wildlife Species Identified or Expected to Occur at the IS&R Site
2-3 Avian Endangered, Threatened, or Utah Species of Concern
3-1 Data Collected During the Ecological Risk Sampling
4-1 Risk Characterization Results, Data Gaps, and Potential Future Studies Identified in the
Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment
4-2 Summary of Assessment and Measurement Endpoints
5-1 HQs for Aquatic Receptors from Direct Contact with Surface Water in Pine Creek and
the Run-Off Ponds
5-2 HQs for Benthic Invertebrates from Direct Contact with Surface Water in Pine Creek and
the Run-Off Ponds
5-3 Results of the SEM/AVS Analysis in Pine Creek Sediments
5-4 Comparison of Sediment Porewater Concentrations to Aqueous Toxicity Benchmarks
5-5 Sediment Toxicity Test Results for Pine Creek
5-6 Summary of Lines of Evidence for Aquatic Receptors in Pine Creek (WA7)
5-7 Summary of Lines of Evidence for Aquatic Receptors in the Run-off Ponds (WA3/WA4)
6-1 Summary of Predictive Model Results for Terrestrial Receptors from Direct Contact with
Soils
6-2 Summary of Plant Community Metrics
6-3 Comparison of Plant Community Zones to Native Range Conditions and Reference
6-4 Comparison of Bulk Metals Concentrations to Plant Community Metrics
6-5 Summary of Plant Community Metric Correlations
6-6 Comparison of Measured Soil Nutrient Levels to Optimal Ranges for Plant Growth and
Plant Community Metrics
6-7 Summary of Lines of Evidence for Terrestrial Plants in Non-AOC Locations
6-8 Summary of Lines of Evidence for Terrestrial Plants in AOC Locations
7-1 Approach for Calculating HQs Accounting for Uncertainty and Variability
7-2 Average (CTE) Factors for Representative Wildlife Species
7-3 High End (RME) Factors for Representative Wildlife Species
7-4 Summary of Selected Wildlife Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs)
7-5a Total HQs for the Red-tailed Hawk for Non-AOC Locations
7-5b Total HQs for the Mule Deer for Non-AOC Locations
7-5c Total HQs for the Red Fox for Non-AOC Locations
7-5d Total HQs for the Cliff Swallow for Non-AOC Locations
7-5e Total HQs for the Mourning Dove for Non-AOC Locations
7-5f Total HQs for the Mallard for Non-AOC Locations
7-5g Total HQs for the Big Brown Bat for Non-AOC Locations
7-5h Total HQs for the Northern Flicker for Non-AOC Locations
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
LIST OF TABLES (cont.)
7-5i Total HQs for the American Robin for Non-AOC Locations
7-5j Total HQs for the Masked Shrew for Non-AOC Locations
7-5k Total HQs for the Deer Mouse for Non-AOC Locations
7-6 Estimated HQs for Non-AOCs (Across All WAs) from All Exposure Pathways
7-7 Metals of Potential Concern Based the Range of Wildlife Total HQ Estimates for
Non-AOCs
7-8 Exposure Pathways Contributing Most to Predicted Risks for the Deer Mouse in
Non-AOCs
7-9 Estimated HQs for AOCs (Across All WAs) from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
7-10 Summary of Lines of Evidence for Wildlife Receptors with Large Home Ranges
7-11 Summary of Lines of Evidence for Wildlife Receptors with Small/Medium Home Ranges
8-1 Summary of COPCs Assigned to the Qualitative Evaluation Category
8-2 Summary of Uncertainties in the Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment
January 3, 2005 vi
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AECI Anderson Engineering Company, Inc.
AOC Area of Concern
ARCO Atlantic Richfield Company
AVS Acid Volatile Sulfide
BAF Bioaccumulation Factor
BLM Bureau of Land Management
COPC Chemical of Potential Concern
CTE Central Tendency Exposure
df Dietary Fraction
DTPA Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (extraction method)
DSR Data Summary Report
ERA Ecological Risk Assessment
HQ Hazard Quotient
IS&R International Smelting & Refining Site
LOAEL Lowest Observed Adverse Effects Level
NOAEL No Observed Adverse Effects Level
Non-AOC Not an Area of Concern
RBA Relative Bioavailability
RI Remedial Investigation
RME Reasonable Maximum Exposure
RWMA Reclamation and Wildlife Management Area
SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan
SEM Simultaneously Extractable Metals
SLERA Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment
SSD Species Sensitivity Distribution
TRV Toxicity Reference Value
UCL Upper Confidence Limit
UDWR Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
WA Work Area
January 3, 2005
vn
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
This document is a Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for the International Smelting
and Refining (IS&R) Site located in Tooele County, Utah. The purpose of the Baseline ERA is
to describe the likelihood, nature, and extent of adverse effects to ecological receptors resulting
from exposure to contaminants released to the environment as a result of past or present site
activities. This information, along with other relevant information, is used by risk managers to
decide whether remedial actions are needed to protect the environment from site-related releases.
SITE CHARACTERIZATION
Site Location and History
The IS&R site occupies about 1,200 acres of land located approximately two miles northeast of
Tooele in Tooele County, Utah. The site occupies the lower portion of Pine Canyon on the west
flank of the Oquirrh Mountains (Figure ES-1). Copper, lead, and zinc smelting and refining
activities were conducted at the site between 1910 and 1972. The site underwent extensive
reclamation activities from 1986 to 1987, including drainage modifications, soil capping, and
revegetation. Since 1994, the site has been managed by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
for the purposes of wildlife habitat and conservation.
Basis for Ecological Concern
Tailings and other wastes released to the environment from refining and smelting operations
generally contain metals that can, depending on the concentration and level of exposure, be toxic
to ecological receptors. A Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLERA) was
performed in June 2003 to provide a preliminary evaluation of the potential for adverse effects to
ecological receptors (aquatic, terrestrial, wildlife) at the site. Based on the best data that were
available at the time, the SLERA concluded that risks from site-related contaminants could not
be excluded for any of these classes of ecological receptor.
January 3, 2005 ES-1
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
DATA SUMMARY AND EVALUATION
Classification and Groupings
The IS&R site has been divided into eleven Work Areas (WAs) based on previous site activities
and natural land features. These WAs include:
WAI - Property north of Pine Creek
WA2 - The slag pile
WAS - The former smelter site
WA4 - Dry Creek Canyon
WAS - Property south of Dry Creek Canyon
WA6 - Between the smelter area and the tailings pond
WA7 - Pine Creek drainage area
WAS - The tailings impoundment, containing the IS&R and Carr Fork tailings
WA9 - West and south of the tailings within the ARCO property
WA10 - Town of Pine Canyon (formerly Lincoln)
WAI 1 - Waste isolation cell
As part of the RI, a walkover inspection was performed within each WA to identify potential
Areas of Concern (AOCs). An area was identified as an AOC if it contained exposed tailings,
erosional gullies, stressed or absent vegetation, or debris associated with mining and smelting
activities. A total of 450 AOCs were identified at the site, ranging in size from one to several
thousand square feet and comprising approximately 2% of the total site area.
Data Collected in Support of the Baseline ERA
Following completion of the SLERA in June 2003, additional data were collected at the IS&R
site to address some of the data gaps identified in the SLERA and to support a more detailed and
thorough evaluation of ecological impacts at the site. The 2003 ecological field investigation
included collection of additional abiotic and biotic samples, gathering plant community
demographic information, and performing site-specific sediment toxicity testing.
PROBLEM FORMULATION
Site Conceptual Model
Figure ES-2 presents the ecological site conceptual model (SCM) for the Baseline ERA.
Because only a few pathways could be excluded as a result of the SLERA, this site model is very
January 3, 2005 ES-2
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
similar to the site model that was developed for the SLERA.
As indicated in the SCM, there are a number of complete exposure pathways by which
ecological receptors may be exposed at the site. However, not all of these exposure pathways
are likely to be of equal concern. For the purposes of this risk assessment, each complete
exposure pathway was classified as follows:
The pathway is considered to be of potential concern, and sufficient data exist to support
a quantitative risk evaluation. These cases are indicated by boxes containing a solid
circle ( • ). These pathways are the primary focus of this risk assessment.
The pathway is considered to be of potential concern, but available data are too limited to
support a reliable quantitative risk evaluation. These cases are shown by boxes with an
open circle ( O ).
The risk posed by the pathway is likely to be minor, either on an absolute basis and/or in
comparison to other exposure pathways that affect the same receptor. These cases are
indicated by boxes with an "X".
Ecological Management Goals
Management goals are descriptions of the basic objectives which the risk manager at a site
wishes to achieve. The overall management goal identified for ecological health at the IS&R site
is as follows:
Ensure adequate protection of ecological systems within the impacted areas of the IS&R
site by protecting them from the deleterious effects of acute and chronic exposures to
site-related contaminants of potential concern.
"Adequate protection" is generally defined as protection of growth, reproduction, and survival of
local populations. That is, the focus is on ensuring sustainability of the local population, rather
than on protection of every individual in the population. The ecological systems identified for
adequate protection include terrestrial soil organisms and plant communities, aquatic life in the
Pine Creek and the run-off ponds, aquatic and terrestrial mammal and bird populations, and any
threatened and endangered species (including candidate species) and species of special concern.
Since 1994, the IS&R site has been managed by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. The
overall goals for the Carr Fork Reclamation and Wildlife Management Area include increasing
January 3, 2005 ES-3
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
the species diversity in both the plant and wildlife communities as well as increasing the carrying
capacity of the site for upland and big game.
Assessment and Measurement Endpoints
Assessment endpoints are the characteristics of the ecological system that are to be protected in
order to achieve management goals. Assessment endpoints are either measured directly or are
evaluated through indirect measures. Measurement endpoints represent quantifiable ecological
characteristics that can be measured, interpreted, and related to the valued ecological
components chosen as the assessment endpoints. Table ES-1 presents the assessment and
measurement endpoints used to interpret potential ecological risks for the IS&R Site that were
evaluated in the Baseline ERA. As seen, the measurement endpoints can be divided into three
basic categories, as follows:
• Hazard Quotients (HQs) (ratio of estimated exposure to safe exposure)
• Site-specific toxicity tests
• Observations of population and community demographics
Because each of the measurement endpoints has both advantages and limitations, conclusions
based on only one method of evaluation may be misleading. Therefore, the best approach for
deriving reliable conclusions is to combine the findings across all of the methods for which data
are available, taking the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method into account.
RISK EVALUATION FOR AQUATIC RECEPTORS
Aquatic habitat at the IS&R site is limited. Pine Creek (WA7) flows westward along the north
edge of the canyon, and generally contains water year round. Several run-off ponds near the
former smelter area (WAS and WA4) form in the spring and retain water for a time, but are
usually dry by mid- to late summer. Benthic invertebrates living in Pine Creek and the run-off
ponds may be exposed to site-related contaminants through several exposure pathways. In this
Baseline ERA, risks to aquatic receptors from direct contact with surface water and sediment
were evaluated quantitatively.
Pine Creek
Several lines of evidence were available which provide information on potential risks to aquatic
receptors in Pine Creek. HQ values based on surface water suggest that Pine Creek is not likely
to have either acute or chronic impacts on aquatic receptors. HQ values based on bulk sediment
January 3, 2005 ES-4
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
benchmarks suggest that sediments in Pine Creek could adversely impact benthic invertebrates,
but this conclusion is not supported by several other lines of evidence. More specifically, results
from the SEM/AVS evaluation, sediment porewater HQs, and the sediment toxicity tests all
suggest that benthic invertebrates exposed to sediments in Pine Creek are not likely to
experience either acute or chronic adverse effects on growth or survival. Toxicity testing of
sediments from the marshy areas near Pine Creek suggests that growth may be decreased in
sensitive invertebrate species such as Hyalella azteca, but it is unlikely that growth impacts to
sensitive organisms would result insignificant population-level effects on density or diversity of
aquatic receptors in Pine Creek. Based on the weight of evidence, it is concluded that risks of
population-level effects to benthic organisms in Pine Creek are minimal. Because multiple lines
of evidence are available, confidence in this conclusion for aquatic receptors in Pine Creek is
moderate to high.
Run-OffPonds
Two lines of evidence were available which provide information on potential risks to aquatic
receptors in the run-off ponds. Surface water HQs indicate that concentrations of several metals
in surface water at the run-off ponds are likely to be acutely toxic to aquatic receptors. Bulk
sediment HQs indicate that metals in sediments from the run-off ponds may also adversely
impact sediment-dwelling benthic invertebrates. These lines of evidence both support
conclusion that the run-off ponds are likely to be toxic to benthic invertebrates. However, HQs
for surface water and sediment are based on limited data collected during a single sampling
event. In addition, predicted risks from sediment are based on bulk toxicity benchmarks which,
at this site, have been demonstrated to be generally overprotective, although the degree to which
these benchmarks are overprotective is unknown. Therefore, confidence in this conclusion is
low to moderate.
RISK EVALUATION FOR TERRESTRIAL RECEPTORS
The structure and function of the plant and terrestrial invertebrate community is important
because it provides a significant portion of the energy, organic matter, and nutrient inputs for
terrestrial systems as well as providing habitat and forage for a variety of wildlife species.
Because plants and terrestrial invertebrates reside directly in the soil and are generally not
mobile, direct contact with soil is the exposure pathway of chief concern. In this Baseline ERA,
risks to terrestrial receptors were evaluated separately for Non-AOC and AOC locations.
January 3, 2005 ES-5
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Plant Communities in Non-AOC Locations
Six individual lines of evidence were available to evaluate impacts to terrestrial plants in
Non-AOC areas at the IS&R site. Predictive estimates of risk (HQ and predictive phytotoxicity
models, as presented in the SLERA) suggest that plant communities may be slightly impacted at
most of the site due to metals in soil. This prediction is consistent with a comparison of
site-specific plant community metrics to an off-site reference area, which indicates that species
diversity, coverage, and biomass are lower than reference in several of the on-site zones. Plant
community metrics do not show an observable correlation with measured bulk soil
concentrations of metals. Although this is not strong evidence that metals, alone or in
combination with other variables (e.g., pH), are unimportant, it does suggest that the contribution
of metals is not the primary factor contributing to variations in plant community health at the
IS&R site. Data do not allow a direct comparison of nutrient levels in site soils and the reference
area, it seems likely that limitations in nutrient levels are not a major contributor to the apparent
decrease in plant community status. Thus, the weight of evidence suggests that metals in soils
from Non-AOCs are likely contributing to a decrease in plant community health at the site, but
the magnitude of the effect compared to other factors that influence plant community status is
likely to be relatively low. Because multiple lines of evidence are generally consistent,
confidence in this conclusion is moderate. If further evaluation is required, laboratory-based
comparisons of plant growth in site soil and an appropriate reference soil would provide valuable
information on the potential role of metals in the observed decreases plant community health at
the IS&R site.
Plant Communities in AOC Locations
Two individual lines of evidence were evaluated for terrestrial plants in AOC areas at the IS&R
site. Predictive risk estimates (HQs and predictive toxicity models, as presented in the SLERA)
suggest that metals in soils from AOC locations are likely to be severely toxic to plants. This
line of evidence is supported by the observations of the AOC site walkover which indicated that
many AOCs are associated with absent or sparse vegetation, often in association with the
presence of exposed tailings. However, quantitative measurements of plant community metrics
in AOC locations were not available, and a more rigorous evaluation of correlation between soil
concentrations of metals and plant community health could not be performed. Although the data
for AOCs are limited, both lines of evidence support the conclusion that metals in soils from
AOCs are severely impacting plants in these locations. Therefore, confidence in this conclusion
is moderate.
January 3, 2005 ES-6
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Terrestrial Invertebrates and Soil Organisms in Non-AOC andAOC Locations
Only one line of evidence was available to characterize potential risks to terrestrial invertebrates
and soil organisms at the IS&R site. Predictive estimates of risk initially presented in the
SLERA suggested that terrestrial invertebrates and soil organism communities may be slightly
impacted in Non-AOCs and severely impacted in AOCs due to metals in soil. Because there are
no other lines of evidence available to support this conclusion, the confidence in the conclusion
is low. In order to better assess the accuracy of these risk predictions, other lines of evidence,
such as site-specific toxicity assessments or community surveys, would be needed.
RISK EVALUATION FOR WILDLIFE RECEPTORS
Wildlife receptors (birds and mammals) that reside and/or feed at the IS&R site may be exposed
to site-related contaminants through several ingestion exposure pathways, including ingestion of
surface water, sediment/soil, and food web items. Because it is not feasible to evaluate risks for
each bird and mammal species potentially present at the site, several surrogate species were
selected to serve as representatives of several different feeding guilds with varying home range
sizes.
Large Home Range Receptors
Only one line of evidence (the HQ approach) was available to evaluate risks to wildlife receptors
with large home ranges (e.g., deer) from contaminants in environmental media at the IS&R site.
HQs for large home range receptors from ingestion of surface water, soil, and terrestrial food
items from Non-AOC locations are generally below a level of concern for all chemicals. For
AOCs, soil HQs indicate that there is the potential for slight impacts due to elevated levels of
metals, if RME receptors were to preferentially feed in these areas. However, given the small
spatial extent of AOCs relative to the total home range size, this exposure scenario is unlikely.
Based on this one line of evidence, it is concluded that populations of large home range wildlife
receptors are not likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion of metals in contaminated media at
the IS&R site. While risks based on the HQ approach are uncertain due to limitations in the
assessment of exposure and toxicity, predicted risks tend to be conservative and are more likely
to overestimate, rather than underestimate, potential risks. Because risks to large home range
receptors are predicted to be below a level of concern, there is moderate confidence in this risk
conclusion.
January 3, 2005 ES-7
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Small/Medium Home Range Receptors
Only one line of evidence (the HQ approach) was available to evaluate risks to wildlife receptors
with small/medium home ranges (e.g., mouse) from contaminants in environmental media at the
IS&R site. Surface water HQs for all receptors were below a level of concern. However, based
on the estimated HQs for Non-AOCs, concentrations of several metals in sediment, soil, plants,
and terrestrial invertebrates were above a level of concern for wildlife receptors with small to
medium home ranges. In addition, soil ingestion HQs for AOCs indicate that if a receptor were
to reside and feed primarily in these areas, elevated levels of multiple metals may cause
significant adverse effects. Because the likelihood that a home range could include all or part of
an AOC is higher for small/medium home range receptors than for large home range receptors,
the contribution of AOC locations to the overall risk also could be high for small home range
receptors.
Based on this one line of evidence, it is concluded that populations of small/medium home range
wildlife receptors are likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion of metals in contaminated
media from both Non-AOCs and AOCs at the IS&R site. As stated previously, estimated risks
based on the HQ approach are uncertain due to limitations in both the exposure and toxicity
assessments and are likely to be biased high. Although it is likely that estimated risks are lower
than predicted, the magnitude of this overestimation is unknown. Because there are no other
lines of evidence available to support the conclusion that populations of small/medium home
range receptors are adversely impacted at the site, there is low confidence in this risk conclusion.
In order to better assess the accuracy of these risk predictions, other lines of evidence, such as
site-specific toxicity assessments or community surveys, would be needed.
UNCERTAINTIES
Quantitative evaluation of ecological risks is generally limited by uncertainty regarding a
number of important data. This lack of knowledge is usually circumvented by making estimates
based on whatever limited data are available, or by making assumptions based on professional
judgement when no reliable data are available. Because of these assumptions and estimates, the
results of the risk calculations are themselves uncertain, and it is important for risk managers and
the public to keep this in mind when interpreting the results of a risk assessment.
Table ES-2 summarizes the various sources of uncertainty in this Baseline ERA, along with a
qualitative estimate of the direction and magnitude of the likely errors attributable to the
uncertainty. Based on all of these considerations, the HQ and Total HQ values calculated and
presented in this Baseline ERA should be viewed as having substantial uncertainty. Because of
January 3, 2005 ES-8
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
the inherent conservatism in the derivation of many of the exposure estimates and toxicity
benchmarks, these HQ and Total HQ values should generally be viewed as being more likely to
be high than low, and results and conclusions should be interpreted accordingly.
OVERALL CONCLUSIONS
Table ES-3 summarizes the overall risk conclusions for aquatic receptors, terrestrial plants,
terrestrial invertebrates and soil organisms, and wildlife receptors that may be exposed to
contaminants at the IS&R site. It is anticipated that these weight of evidence conclusions for
ecological receptors will be used to by risk managers to determine whether remedial actions are
needed to protect the environment from site-related releases.
January 3, 2005 ES-9
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Figure ES-1 Site Location and Features Map
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
T J
r<
• ..
Lincoln '••':.• «„.
f—-»-' . •'
I- '
: -
Map Source: AECI Work Area Data Summary Reports 2001-2002
-------
Figure ES-2
Site Conceptual Model for Ecological Exposure
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting and Refining Site
Source
Smelting and
Refining Operations
LEG
Primary Release
Mechanism
EN]
X
o
•
Historic Stack
Emissions
Solid Waste Disposal
(tailings, slag, waste
rock, etc.)
0
Potentially Impacted Environmental Media Exposure Route
/
* Surface Soil,
1 — ^- Tailings
\
Groundwater
a
* Surface Water
k c- i- /a
* Sediment
Aquatic
Receptors
Benthics
Terrestrial Receptors
(Plants & Invert.)
Plants
Soil
Organisms
Wildlife Receptors (Birds
& Mammals)
Riparian
Upland
Amphibians
& Reptiles
Inhalation
/^ Direct Contact
X
X
X
X
Ingestion
Direct Contact
NV Terrestrial Food Items
(Plants, Mammals, H Ingestion
Invertebrates)
Ingestion
Direct Contact
•
•
•
X
•
X
O
0
•
•
O
• /Xe
Xd
X
Xd
X
O
0
^ (Benthic Invertebrates & *] Ingestion
O
•
o
-^ Plants)
Ingestion
Direct Contact
0
•
•b
X
0
0
Pathway is not complete; no evaluation required
Pathway is complete, but is judged to be minor compared to other exposure pathways; qualitative evaluation
Pathway is complete and might be significant; but insufficient data are available for quantitative evaluation
Pathway is complete and might be significant; sufficient data are available for quantitative evaluation
Notes:
a Exposure locations include Pine Creek and run-off ponds.
b Due to the temporal nature of the run-off ponds, sediments at these locations will also be evaluated as soils.
c Aquatic habitats (Pine Creek, run-off ponds) at the IS&R site are not expected to support fish.
d Based on the results of the SLERA, exposures from ingestion of surface water were below a level of concern.
e Based on the results of the SLERA, exposures from direct contact with surface water were below a level of concern for Pine Creek but above a level of concern for the run-off ponds.
Fig ES-2 IS&R Eco SCM.xls
-------
Table ES-1
Summary of Assessment and Measurement Endpoints
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Receptor
Aquatic
Terrestrial
Wildlife
Assessment Endpoint
Protection of aquatic invertebrates from
adverse effects related to exposure to
chemicals in surface water.
Protection of aquatic invertebrates from
adverse effects related to exposure to
chemicals in sediment.
Protection of terrestrial plants and soil
organisms from adverse effects related to
exposure to chemicals in surface soil.
Protection of wildlife from adverse effects
to growth, reproduction, or survival related
to exposure to chemicals in surface water,
sediment, soil, and dietary items.
Measurement Endpoint
HO Approach: Comparison of measured contaminant concentrations in surface water to
screening level toxicity benchmarks for the aquatic community.
HO Approach: Comparison of measured contaminant concentrations in bulk sediment to
screening level toxicity benchmarks for benthic invertebrates.
HO Approach: Comparison of measured simultaneously extractable metals (SEM) to acid
volatile sulfide (AVS) concentrations in sediment.
HO Approach: Comparison of measured contaminant concentrations in sediment porewate
to screening level toxicity benchmarks for the aquatic community.
Site Toxicitv Testing: Comparison of measured survival and growth endpoints in site
sediment toxicity tests (Hyalella azteca and Chironomus tentans ) to reference/control
sediments.
r
Community Demographics: n/a
HO Approach: Comparison of contaminant concentrations in soil to screening level toxicitv
benchmarks for terrestrial plants and soil organisms.
Site Toxicitv Testing: n/a
Community Demographics: Comparison of plant community metrics for site locations to
applicable reference locations.
Comparison of the contaminant doses estimated from contaminant concentrations in surface
water, sediment, soil, and dietary items to toxicity reference values (TRVs) for wildlife.
Site Toxicitv Testing: n/a
Community Demographics: n/a
n/a = data are not available to assess risks using this type of measurement endpoint
Table ES-1 A&M Endpoints.xls
6/18/2004
-------
Table ES-2
Summary of Uncertainties in the Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Assessment
Component
Nature and Extent
of Contamination
Exposure
Assessment
Toxicity
Assessment
Uncertainty Description
Samples collected may not be fully representative of variability in
space or time, especially if the number of samples is small.
Analytical results may be imprecise.
Some exposure pathways were not evaluated.
Some chemicals were not evaluated because chemical was never
detected, but detection limit was too high to detect the chemical if it
were present at a level of concern.
Exposure point concentrations for wildlife receptors are based on a
limited measured dataset.
Exposure parameters for wildlife receptors are based on studies at
other sites.
Absorption from site media is assumed to be the same as in laboratory
studies.
Wildlife receptors selected as representative species may not capture
the full range of sensitivities in site receptors.
Aquatic toxicity benchmarks are based on a wide range of species,
some of which do not occur at this site.
Many chemicals lack reliable toxicity benchmarks for some receptors
for some media; these chemicals are not evaluated.
Available toxicity benchmarks are often based on limited data, and
values must be extrapolated across species.
Likely Direction
of Error
Unknown
Unknown
Underestimate of risk
Underestimate of risk
Use of UCL or max detect
is likely to overestimate
risk
Unknown
Overestimate of risks
Unknown
Likely to overestimate risk
Underestimation of risk
Unknown
Likely Magnitude
of Error
Probably small
Probably small
Unknown, could be significant
Usually small
Variable (depends on number
of data points and magnitude of
variability); can be evaluated
by comparing best estimate to
upper bound estimate
Probably small
Possibly significant
Probably small
Probably small
Probably small in most cases
Unknown, could be significant
Table ES-2 Uncertainty Summary.wpd
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table ES-2
Summary of Uncertainties in the Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Assessment
Component
Toxicity
Assessment (cont.)
Risk
Characterization
Uncertainty Description
Available toxicity benchmarks are often based on limited data, and
values are often adjusted with uncertainty factors to account for
extrapolation across dose (LOAEL to NOAEL) or duration (acute to
chronic).
Dose-response curves and toxicity benchmarks based on laboratory
studies are assumed to be applicable to free-living populations in the
field.
Interactions between chemicals are difficult to account for; effects of
one chemical may increase, decrease, or have no effect on other
chemicals.
Estimation of population-level effects from HQ calculations is
difficult and subject to professional judgement.
Likely Direction
of Error
Likely to overestimate in
most cases
Unknown; variability
maybe higher in wild
populations than
laboratory animals, hence
high end risks may tend to
be underestimated
Unknown
Unknown
Likely Magnitude
of Error
Unknown, could be significant
Unknown, probably minor
Unknown, but probably small
Unknown, probably small in
most cases
Table ES-2 Uncertainty Summary.wpd
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table ES-3
Weight of Evidence Summary for Ecological Receptors at the IS&R Site
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Receptor
Weight of Evidence Conclusion
Confidence in
Conclusion
Aquatic Receptors
Risks of population-level effects to benthic organisms
in Pine Creek are minimal.
Moderate to high
Run-off ponds are likely to be toxic to benthic
invertebrates, but impacts from the ponds are not
expected to alter the overall aquatic community health
when evaluated on a site-wide basis.
Low to Moderate
Terrestrial Plants
Metals in soils from Non-AOCs are likely
contributing to a decrease in plant community health
at the site. However, the magnitude of the effect
compared to other factors that influence plant
community status is likely to be relatively low.
Metals in soils are severely impacting plants in many
AOC locations.
Moderate
Moderate
Terrestrial
Invertebrates &
Soil Organisms
Communities may be slightly impacted in Non-AOCs
and severely impacted in AOCs due to metals in soil.
Low
Wildlife with
Large Home
Ranges
Wildlife populations with large home ranges are not
likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion of metals
in contaminated media at the IS&R site.
Moderate
Wildlife with
Small/Medium
Home Ranges
Wildlife populations with small/medium home ranges
are likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion of
metals in sediment/soil and terrestrial food web items
both from Non-AOCs and AOCs.
Low
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
This document is a Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for the International Smelting
and Refining (IS&R) Site located in Tooele County, Utah (Figure 1-1). The purpose of the
Baseline ERA is to describe the likelihood, nature, and extent of adverse effects to ecological
receptors resulting from exposure to contaminants released to the environment as a result of past
or present site activities. This information, along with other relevant information, is used by risk
managers to decide whether remedial actions are needed to protect the environment from site-
related releases.
1.2 Methods
This Baseline ERA was performed in accordance with current United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) guidance for ecological risk assessments (USEPA, 1992; 1997;
1998). The general sequence of steps used to carry out an ecological risk assessment at a
Superfund site is illustrated in Figure 1-2 (USEPA, 1997). It is important to realize that the eight
steps shown in Figure 1-2 are not intended to represent a linear sequence of mandatory tasks.
Rather, some tasks may proceed in parallel, some tasks may be performed in a phased or
iterative fashion, and some tasks may be judged to be unnecessary at certain sites.
1.3 Organization
In addition to this introduction, this Baseline ERA report is organized into the following main
sections.
Section 2 - This section details the location, description, environmental setting, and
history of the IS&R Site.
Section 3 - This section summarizes the data used to perform the risk assessment.
Section 4 - This section presents the ecological problem formulation, including a
summary of the preliminary findings and conclusions, the site conceptual model, the
assessment and measurement endpoints, and a description of the basic methods used in
the assessment.
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Section 5 - This section presents the ecological risk characterization for the aquatic
receptors of concern.
Section 6 - This section presents the ecological risk characterization for terrestrial
receptors of concern, including plants and soil organisms.
Section 7 - This section presents the ecological risk characterization for wildlife receptors
of concern, including birds and mammals.
Section 8 - This section provides a summary of the main uncertainties that limit
confidence in the risk characterization for each of the exposure areas and classes of
ecological receptors evaluated at the site.
Section 9 - This section provides citations for all data, methods, studies, and reports
utilized in the Baseline ERA.
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
Detailed information on the International Smelting & Refining Site, including a history of
mining and smelting operations, site reclamation activities, and regulatory actions for the site is
provided in a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) prepared for the site Remedial Investigation
(RI) (AECI, 2001). A description the regional characteristics and ecological setting for the site
is provided in AECI (2003a). Information from these documents that is useful in the ecological
risk assessment is summarized below.
2.1 Site Location
The IS&R site occupies about 1,200 acres of land located approximately two miles northeast of
Tooele in Tooele County, Utah. Figure 2-1 provides a map of the site location and key site
features.
The site is located in Pine Canyon, on the west flank of the Oquirrh Mountains. The site
includes the former smelter area (125 acres), a slag pile (just under 30 acres), tailings from both
the Carr Fork and IS&R operations (about 326 acres), Pine Canyon landfill, Carr Fork landfill, a
waste isolation cell, Elton tunnel waste rock, and adjacent parcels of buffer land. The site is
drained primarily by Pine Creek, which flows westward out of the canyon along the northern site
boundary and infiltrates into the unsaturated alluvium prior to reaching the property line. Pine
Creek upstream of the IS&R site receives water from other mining facilities (Kennecott Utah
Copper) in upper Pine Canyon. The southern portion of the site is drained by Dry Creek, an
ephemeral stream that flows in response to rainfall and snowmelt.
2.2 Site History
Copper, lead, and zinc smelting and refining activities were conducted at the site between 1910
and 1972 by the Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), formerly known as Anaconda. The site
underwent extensive reclamation activities from 1986 to 1987. Reclamation activities included
drainage modifications, soil capping, and revegetation. Since 1994, the IS&R site has been
managed by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) for the purposes of wildlife
habitat and conservation.
Table 2-1 provides a timeline of historic site activities including information on mining
operations, reclamation efforts, and key regulatory actions. Additional details on the mining
operation, reclamation and regulatory history of the IS&R site are provided in the SAP for the RI
(AECI, 2001).
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
2.3 Environmental Setting
The Oquirrh mountains in the region of the site are characterized by hot, dry summers and cold
winters with an average precipitation of about 10 inches per year. In winter months, the site is
often covered by snow (AECI, 2003a).
2.3.1 Aquatic Environment
Pine Creek. Pine Creek is a small stream that originates in the mountains east of the site and
flows westerly across the northern portion of the site, terminating in a small marshy area near the
Elton Tunnel waste rock area. Due to its limited flow in the summer, Pine Creek does not
sustain fish but does contain benthic invertebrates (AECI, 2001; 2003a). An aquatic invertebrate
survey at one sampling location in Pine Creek was completed in October of 2002. Aquatic
invertebrates that were identified at this sampling location included: Oligochaeta (worms),
Coleoptera (beetles), Diptera (flies), Chironomidae (midge), Gastropoda (snails), Odonata,
Anisoptera (damselflies), Colembola (spring tails), and Hydracarina (water mite) (AECI,
2003a).
Run-off Ponds. There are several small run-off ponds located in or near the former smelter area.
These ponds are present in the spring for approximately one to three months each year. These
ponds do not support fish, but might support some aquatic invertebrates, and may also provide a
temporary source of drinking watering for a variety of birds and mammals.
Dry Creek. Dry Creek is an ephemeral stream that passes through the central portion of the site
and across the former smelter area. It flows during spring run-off periods and after precipitation
events. The tailings dams have been constructed to allow Dry Creek flow to pass through the
dams and terminate in the floodplains beyond the tailings impoundment. Because of its
ephemeral flow, Dry Creek contains minimal aquatic habitat and is not expected to support fish
or benthic invertebrates (AECI, 2001; 2003a).
A few other ephemeral streams are located within the IS&R site boundary (Spring Creek,
Swensons Creek, other unnamed drainages) however these streams are expected to contain water
only during spring run-off periods, contain minimal aquatic habitat, and are not expected to
support fish or benthic invertebrates.
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
2.3.2 Terrestrial Environment
The terrestrial vegetation habitats at the IS&R site can be classified into three general categories:
1) submontane shrub; 2) reclaimed rangeland; and 3) riparian. Each of these habitat types are
described in more detail below.
Submontane Shrub Vegetative Association. This vegetative association is also known as
Rocky Mountain Brushland and represents an ecotone (transition area) between lower
desert shrub and grassland areas and higher elevation submontane woodland. At the
IS&R site, the vegetative association is dominated by Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii),
curl-leaf mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius), bitterbush (Purshia tridentata),
and cliffrose (Cowania mexicana). This habitat is found along the slopes of both the
northern and southern boundaries of the site (AECI, 2003a).
Reclaimed Areas Vegetation Association. This vegetative association occurs in areas
that were formerly impacted by wastes from mining and smelter operations that have
subsequently been reclaimed. This includes the slag, former tailing impoundments,
tailing dams, and other former operational areas. Revegetation of the reclaimed areas has
taken place with mixtures of grasses, forbs and woody vegetation. Representative
grasses and forbs include cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), yellow sweet clover (Melilotus
officinalis), tall wheatgrass (Elymus elongatus), and western ragweed (Ambrosia
psilostrachya). Woody vegetation includes rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus
nauseosus), bitterbrush and sandbar willow (Salix exigua) (AECI, 2003a).
Riparian Vegetation Association. This vegetation association occurs along the Pine
Creek drainage. Representative vegetation includes Russian olive (Elaeagnus
angustifolia Z.), sandbar willow, box elder maple (Acer negundo L.) and narrowleaf
cottonwood (Populus angustifolia). The small marshlands in the lower section of Pine
Creek are characterized by emergent cattail (Typha spp.) and bulrush (Scirpus spp.).
Although the riparian area is small in acreage, it provides some of the best wildlife
habitat at the IS&R site (AECI, 2003a). Historically, this area was adversely impacted
by livestock grazing. With the cessation of grazing, a recovery of the vegetative
community has been observed and is expected to continue to improve (AECI, 2003a).
As discussed in the RI, these three terrestrial vegetation habitats may be further classified into
five zones that represent similar vegetation and soil conditions, as determined by visual surveys
of plant canopy cover and quantitative vegetation inventories at the site (AECI, 2003a). The five
zones are shown in Figure 2-2 and are described as follows:
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone 1: Mountain Shrub without Disturbances. The vegetation within this zone is the
same as that described for the submontaine shrub vegetative association. This zone is
described as a sagebrush terrace with no physical mining disturbance that is composed
primarily of upland gravelly loam with a Gambels oak and sagebrush vegetation group
(AECI, 2003a).
Zone 2: Mountain Shrub with Disturbances. This zone is described as a sagebrush
terrace that had been physically disturbed where former mining and milling operations
occurred. Most of these areas are reported to be covered and revegetated (AECI, 2003a).
Vegetation within this zone is also described as the reclaimed areas vegetation
association.
Zone 3: Sagebrush-Grass Steppe with Revegetated Tailings Facilities. This
vegetation group is found on the tailings impoundment areas that have been covered and
revegetated. The zone is classified as an upland gravelly loam, mountain big sagebrush
vegetation group. Vegetation within this zone is also described as the reclaimed areas
vegetation association.
Zone 4: Pine Creek Canyon Riparian Area. This zone is described as the riparian
vegetation area in the Pine Creek Canyon and has had some physical mining
disturbances. Vegetation within this zone is also described as the riparian vegetation
association (AECI, 2003a).
Zone 5: Sagebrush-Grass Steppe without Disturbances. The sagebrush-grass steppe
association is dominated by sagebrush, rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidifloms),
bitterbrush and a variety of forbs and grasses. This zone encompasses areas with
sagebrush-grass steppe vegetation with no physical mining or milling operation
disturbances and no revegetation. This zone is made up primarily of upland gravelly loam
vegetation such as mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata). In alluvial fan areas,
the zone is loamy-bottomed and vegetated primarily with Great Basin wild rye (Leymus
cinereus) (AECI, 2003a).
2.3.3 Wildlife
Table 2-2 lists wildlife species that have been observed at the site or that are expected to occur at
the site (AECI, 2003a).
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Approximately 126 species of birds are expected to use the IS&R site during the year. Most
species are considered residents or summer breeders. Among the most common species are the
western meadowlark (Sturnella neglectd), horned lark (Eremophila alpestris\ house finch
(Carpodacus mexicanus), spotted towhee (Pipilo maculatus\ western scrub jay (Amphelocoma
coerulescens) and common raven (Corvus cor ax). Common birds of prey include the red-tailed
hawk (Buteo sparverius), Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii\ and the American kestrel (Falco
sparverius). Breeding summer species include the mourning dove (Zenaida macrourd), common
nighthawk (Chordeiles minor), broad-tailed hummingbird (Selasphorusplatycercus)., dusky
flycatcher (Epidonax oberholseri\ western kingbird (Tyrannus verticalis\ warbling vireo (Vireo
givus\ yellow warbler (Spizella breweri\ black-headed grosbeak (Pheucticus melanocephalus)
and Bullock's oriole (Icterus bullockii) (AECI, 2003a).
Approximately 64 species of mammals are expected to inhabit the IS&R site including three
insectivores, three bats, 11 carnivores, 27 rodents, three rabbits and two large herbivores (elk and
mule deer) (Table 2-2). Also expected to occur at the IS&R site are three species of amphibians
and 20 species of reptiles (Table 2-2) (AECI, 2003a).
Several bird species listed as either endangered, threatened or species of concern by the Utah
Division of Wildlife Resources may occur seasonally at the IS&R site. Table 2-3 provides a
listing and description of the status and potential occurrence of each of these species (AECI,
2003a).
2.4 Basis for Concern
Tailings and other wastes released to the environment from refining and smelting operations
generally contain metals that can, depending on the concentration and level of exposure, be toxic
to ecological receptors. In accord with the eight-step process recommended by USEPA for
evaluating ecological risks (see Figure 1-2), the ecological risk assessment process at this site
was initiated by performing a Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLERA) (USEPA,
2003a). The SLERA was performed to provide a preliminary evaluation of the potential for
adverse effects to ecological receptors (aquatic, terrestrial, wildlife) at the site. Because a
SLERA normally uses a number of simplifying assumptions and approaches and is intentionally
conservative, the SLERA was not intended to support any final quantitative conclusions about
the magnitude of the potential ecological risks. Based on the best data that were available at the
time, the SLERA concluded that risks from site-related contaminants could not be excluded for
any of these classes of ecological receptor, and identified a number of data items that would be
needed to support a more detailed ecological risk evaluation.
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
3 DATA SUMMARY AND EVALUATION
3.1 Data Classification and Grouping
3.7.7 Work Areas (WAs)
The IS&R site has been divided into eleven Work Areas (WAs) based on previous site activities
and natural land features. Data Summary Reports (DSRs) for each WA summarize the site
history, reclamation activities, land use, field sampling objectives, samples collected during the
RI, analytical results, and quality control (AECI, 2002a). These WAs are shown in Figure 3-1
and include:
WAI - Property north of Pine Creek
WA2 - The slag pile
WA3 - The former smelter site; segregated into two parts. 3N - the area east of the paved
road, located north of Dry Creek up to the eastern property boundary. 3S -
located south of Dry Creek.
WA4 - Dry Creek Canyon
WAS - Property south of Dry Creek Canyon
WA6 - Between the smelter area and the tailings pond
WA7 - Pine Creek drainage area
WAS - The tailings impoundment, containing the IS&R and Carr Fork tailings
WA9 - West and south of the tailings within the ARCO property
WA10 - Town of Pine Canyon (formerly Lincoln)
WAI 1 - Waste isolation cell
3.7.2 Areas of Concern (AOCs)
As part of the RI, a walkover inspection was performed within each WA to identify potential
Areas of Concern (AOCs). An area was identified as an AOC if it contained exposed tailings,
erosional gullies, stressed or absent vegetation, or debris associated with mining and smelting
activities (AECI, 2002b). A total of 450 AOCs were identified at the site, ranging in size from
one to several thousand square feet. Approximately 20% of the AOCs (79 locations) were
randomly selected and a surface (0-2") soil composite was collected from each location (AECI,
2002b). Samples generated in these impacted areas are referred to as "AOC" samples.
As part of a site-wide sampling of all WAs, additional surficial and subsurface soil samples were
collected from each WA at locations both within and outside of the 1986 reclamation cap. It is
January 3, 2005 8
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
important to note that this site-wide sampling effort generally avoided visually impacted areas.
Samples generated as part of this sampling effort are therefore referred to as "Non-AOC"
samples.
3.2 Data Used in the SLERA
The SLERA (USEPA, 2003 a) provided a detailed description of the data which were used to
perform the initial screening-level characterization of risks to ecological receptors at the site. In
brief, each of the investigations performed at the IS&R site were reviewed for the availability of
analytical data that could be used for the ecological risk assessment. Historic studies performed
before or during the restoration activities in 1986-1987 were not selected for use in the SLERA
because they do not represent current site conditions. Of the studies that collected data after
restoration activities were completed, greatest confidence was placed in data generated from
2001 to 2002 in support of the RI (AECI, 2002a).
3.3 Data Collected in Support of the Baseline ERA
Following completion of the SLERA in June 2003, additional data were collected at the IS&R
site to address some of the data gaps identified in the SLERA and to support a more detailed and
thorough evaluation of ecological impacts at the site. This field investigation included collection
of additional abiotic and biotic samples, gathering plant community demographic information,
and performing site-specific sediment toxicity testing (AECI, 2003b). Figure 3-2 provides a
map of the stations sampled and types of media collected from each station during this
investigation. Table 3-1 summarizes the number and types of data collected and Appendix A
provides the detailed analytical results from this field investigation.
3.4 Summary Statistics for Environmental Media
The data provided in the WA-specific DSRs (AECI, 2002a), the AOC evaluation (AECI, 2002b),
and the 2003 ecological risk sampling DSR (AECI, 2003b) were assembled into an electronic
database (Microsoft Access®). This database is available upon request from USEPA Region 8.
Appendix B provides summary statistics (detection frequency, average, standard deviation,
minimum, maximum) for each analyte in each medium for each WA. Summary statistics for
soils were stratified into AOC and Non-AOC locations.
January 3, 2005
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
4 PROBLEM FORMULATION
Problem formulation is a systematic planning step that identifies the major concerns and issues
to be considered in the Baseline ERA, and a description of the basic approach that will be used
to characterize the potential risks that may exist. As discussed in USEPA guidance (USEPA,
1997), problem formulation is an iterative process, undergoing refinement as new information
and findings become available. In accordance with this guidance, problem formulation for this
ecological risk assessment began with a screening-level ecological risk assessment (SLERA).
This screening-level assessment was completed for the site in June 2003 (USEPA, 2003a).
Section 4.1 summarizes the main findings of the SLERA, which in turn helped refine the
problem formulation for the Baseline ERA (Sections 4.2 to 4.4).
4.1 Summary of the Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLERA)
Ecological Receptors of Potential Concern
Ecological receptors evaluated in the SLERA included aquatic receptors (benthic invertebrates)
in the Pine Creek (WA7) and the run-off ponds (WAS), terrestrial receptors (plants, soil
invertebrates) in contact with surface soils in Non-AOC and AOC locations across all WAs, and
wildlife receptors that reside at the site.
Exposure Pathways Evaluated
Exposure pathways that were quantitatively evaluated in the SLERA included:
Direct contact of benthic invertebrates with surface water and sediment
Direct contact of terrestrial plants and soil invertebrates with soil and tailings
Ingestion of surface water, sediment, and soil by birds and mammals
Ingestion of food items (invertebrates1, plants, and small mammals) by birds and
mammals
Summary of Screening-Level Risk Findings
Table 4-1 provides a summary of the screening level risk findings presented in the SLERA.
Based on the preliminary risk characterization in the SLERA, further evaluation was
recommended for almost all quantitative exposure pathways. No further evaluation of aquatic
1 Included aquatic invertebrates, flying insects, and terrestrial and soil-dwelling invertebrates.
lanuary 3, 2005 10
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
receptors from direct contact with surface water in Pine Creek, wildlife exposures from ingestion
of surface water, and large home range receptor (fox, hawk, deer) exposures from ingestion
pathways was recommended because predicted risks were likely to be below a level of concern.
Summary of Data Gaps
The SLERA identified a number of data areas where additional information was needed to help
improve the reliability and accuracy of the risk assessment. The right side of Table 4-1 provides
a summary of these data gaps and potential data collection activities. These data gaps were
considered in the development of the 2003 ecological field investigation sampling plan to collect
additional data to support ecological risk assessment at the site (AECI, 2003b).
4.2 Site Conceptual Model for the Baseline ERA
Figure 4-1 presents the ecological site conceptual model (SCM) for the Baseline ERA. Because
only a few pathways could be excluded as a result of the SLERA, this site model is very similar
to the site model that was developed for the SLERA.
As indicated in the SCM, ecological receptors that may be exposed at the site include aquatic
receptors (benthic macroinvertebrates), terrestrial receptors (plants and soil invertebrates),
wildlife receptors (birds and mammals), and amphibians and reptiles. Each receptor class may
be exposed to chemical contamination via contact with one or more environmental media,
including surface water, sediment, soil/tailings, aquatic food items, and terrestrial food items.
However, not all of these exposure pathways are likely to be of equal concern. For the purposes
of this risk assessment, each complete exposure pathway was classified as follows:
The pathway is considered to be of potential concern, and sufficient data exist to support
a quantitative risk evaluation. These cases are indicated by boxes containing a solid
circle ( • ). These pathways are the primary focus of this risk assessment.
The pathway is considered to be of potential concern, but available data are too limited to
support a reliable quantitative risk evaluation. These cases are shown by boxes with an
open circle ( O ) and are discussed qualitatively in the Uncertainties section (Section 8).
The risk posed by the pathway is likely to be minor, either on an absolute basis and/or in
comparison to other exposure pathways that affect the same receptor. These cases are
indicated by boxes with an "X".
January 3, 2005 11
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
The pathway is considered to be incomplete (i.e., not thought to occur). These cases are
shown as open boxes.
The following sections provide a more detailed discussion of the exposure pathways selected for
quantitative evaluation in the Baseline ERA.
4.2.1 A quatic Receptors
Of the aquatic environments described in Section 2.4.1, only Pine Creek and the run-off ponds
are expected to support aquatic life. The remaining environments are ephemeral and dry most of
the year and are not expected to provide adequate aquatic habitat. As noted earlier, Pine Creek
and the run-off ponds do not support fish, so only benthic invertebrates are of potential concern.
• One of the main pathways of exposure for benthic invertebrates is direct contact with
surface water. Based on the results of the SLERA, exposures from direct contact with
surface water were below a level of concern for Pine Creek, so this pathway was not re-
evaluated in this Baseline ERA. The SLERA predicted risks from surface water in the
run-off ponds, but no new data have been collected from these locations (because they
were dry at the time of the 2003 field investigation), so risks could not be analyzed
further in this Baseline ERA.
• The other main pathway of exposure for benthic invertebrates is direct contact with
sediment. Based on the results of the SLERA, exposures from direct contact with
sediment were predicted to be above a level of potential concern in both Pine Creek and
the run-off ponds. No new sediment data were collected after the SLERA from the run-
off ponds, so further risk characterization could not be performed in this Baseline ERA.
However, new data are available for sediments from Pine Creek, so this exposure
pathway was re-evaluated in this Baseline ERA.
• Ingestion of aquatic food web items is a pathway of potential concern for benthic
invertebrates. Likewise, incidental ingestion of sediment by these receptors might occur
in some cases. For benthic invertebrates, sediment effect concentration benchmarks and
sediment toxicity studies are likely to capture exposure both by contact with the sediment
and ingestion of detritus and sediment particles, so oral exposure of invertebrates was not
considered separately from direct contact with sediment.
January 3, 2005 12
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
4.2.2 Plants and Soil Organisms
• The primary exposure pathway for both terrestrial plants and soil invertebrates is direct
contact with contaminated soils. Based on the results of the SLERA, widespread toxicity
to both plants and invertebrates was predicted at the IS&R site. Although no new soil
data were collected since the SLERA, new information on plant community metrics is
available. These community data were used in this Baseline ERA to further characterize
potential risks to the plant community.
• For terrestrial plants, exposure may also occur due to deposition of dust on foliar (leaf)
surfaces, but this pathway is believed to be small compared to root exposures, and was
not evaluated in this assessment.
4.2.3 Birds and Mammals
As shown in the conceptual site model, wildlife (birds and mammals) may be exposed via
several ingestion pathways, including ingestion of surface water, sediment, soil, and dietary
items. All of these exposure pathways were re-evaluated quantitatively in this Baseline ERA for
the following reasons:
• to take advantage of new data on measured concentrations in plants and soil
invertebrates;
• to provide better characterization of variability and uncertainty in risk estimates; and
• to segregate predicted risks into Non-AOC and AOC locations.
While direct contact (i.e., dermal exposure) of birds and mammals to soils, sediments, and
surface water and inhalation exposure to airborne dusts may occur, these exposures are judged to
be minor in comparison to exposures from ingestion (USEPA, 2003b). Therefore, these
exposure pathways were not evaluated quantitatively in this Baseline ERA.
4.2.4 Amphibians and Reptiles
Amphibians and reptiles may be exposed to site-related contaminants in surface water,
sediment, soil, and the diet. Although these exposure pathways could be significant, data
on exposure and toxicity needed to perform a quantitative evaluation for each potential
exposure pathway are very limited and risks were not evaluated quantitatively.
January 3, 2005 13
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
4.3 Ecol ogi cal Management Goal s
Management goals are descriptions of the basic objectives which the risk manager at a site
wishes to achieve. The overall management goal identified for ecological health at the IS&R site
as first provided in the SLERA (USEPA 2003a) is as follows:
Ensure adequate protection of ecological systems within the impacted areas of the IS&R
site by protecting them from the deleterious effects of acute and chronic exposures to
site-related contaminants of potential concern.
In order to provide greater specificity regarding this general goal and to identify specific
measurable ecological values to be protected, the following list of sub-goals were derived
(USEPA, 2003a):
Ensure adequate protection of aquatic life in site surface waters from the deleterious
effects of acute and chronic exposures to site-related contaminants of potential concern.
Ensure adequate protection of terrestrial plant and soil organism communities, including
native plant communities, by protecting them from the deleterious effects of acute and
chronic exposures to site-related contaminants of potential concern.
Ensure adequate protection of mammal and bird populations by protecting them from the
deleterious effects of acute and chronic exposures to site-related contaminants of
potential concern.
Ensure adequate protection of threatened and endangered species (including candidate
species) and species of special concern and their habitat by protecting them from the
deleterious effects of acute and chronic exposures to site-related contaminants of
potential concern.
"Adequate protection" is generally defined as protection of growth, reproduction, and survival of
local populations. That is, the focus is on ensuring sustainability of the local population, rather
than on protection of every individual in the population.
Since 1994, the IS&R site has been managed by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
(UDWR). The overall goals for the Carr Fork Reclamation and Wildlife Management Area
(RWMA), as established in the Management Plan Summary, include the following (UDWR,
2002):
January 3, 2005 14
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Increase species diversity through protection and enhancement of wetland and riparian
areas, restoration of sagebrush-grass communities on benchlands, introduction of upland
game species, planning and implementation of habitat enhancement projects, and control
of livestock trespass.
Increase carrying capacity of the RWMA for upland game by increasing availability and
continuity of winter cover and food resources, protection and enhancement of habitat,
and possible use of Pine Creek water for on-site irrigation of food and cover plots.
Increase carrying capacity of the RWMA for big game by enhancement of rangelands
within and adjacent to the RWMA, minimizing disturbance to wintering animals,
reducing risk of human-caused range fires, and monitoring impacts of human recreational
activities on wildlife.
The USEPA's risk management goals for the IS&R site include the goals provided in the UDWR
wildlife management plan.
4.4 Assessment and Measurement Endpoints
Assessment endpoints are the characteristics of the ecological system that are to be protected in
order to achieve management goals. Assessment endpoints are either measured directly or are
evaluated through indirect measures. Measurement endpoints represent quantifiable ecological
characteristics that can be measured, interpreted, and related to the valued ecological
components chosen as the assessment endpoints (USEPA, 1992; 1997).
Table 4-2 presents the assessment and measurement endpoints used to interpret potential
ecological risks for the IS&R Site that were evaluated in the Baseline ERA. As seen, the
measurement endpoints can be divided into three basic categories, as follows:
Hazard Quotients (HQs)
Site-specific toxicity tests
Observations of population and community demographics
These three basic types of measurement endpoint are described in more detail below.
January 3, 2005 15
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
4.4.1 Hazard Quotients
A Hazard Quotient (HQ) is the ratio of the estimated exposure of a receptor at the site to a
"benchmark" exposure that is believed to be without significant risk of unacceptable adverse
effect:
HQ = Exposure / Benchmark
Exposure may be expressed in a variety of ways, including:
• Concentration in an environmental medium (water, sediment, soil, diet)
• Concentration in the tissues of an exposed receptor
• Amount of chemical ingested by a receptor
Concentration values in environmental media such as soil, sediment and water are usually
measured directly, while concentrations in dietary items and tissues of exposed receptors may be
measured directly or predicted using mathematical uptake models. In nearly all cases, the
amount of chemical ingested is calculated from measures of concentration in ingested media. In
all cases, the benchmark toxicity value must be of the same type as the exposure estimate.
When a receptor is exposed by more than one pathway (e.g, birds and mammals), HQs for each
exposure pathway are added across pathways resulting in a "Total HQ" for each chemical. In
accordance with USEPA guidance, HQs for different chemicals are not added unless reliable
data are available to indicate that the two (or more) chemicals act on the same target tissue by the
same mode of action. At this site, HQ values for each chemical were not added across different
chemicals.
If the value of an HQ is less than or equal to 1, risk of unacceptable adverse effects in the
exposed individual is judged to be acceptable. If the HQ exceeds 1, the risk of adverse effect in
the exposed individual is of potential concern, with the probability and/or severity of effect
tending to increase as the value of the HQ increases.
When interpreting HQ results for ecological receptors, it is important to remember that the
assessment endpoint is usually based on the sustainability of exposed populations, and risks to
some individuals in a population may be acceptable if the population is expected to remain
healthy and stable. In these cases, population risk is best characterized by quantifying the
fraction of all individuals that have HQ values greater than 1, and by the magnitude of the
exceedences.
January 3, 2005 16
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
The fraction of the population that must have HQ values below a value of 1 in order for the
population to remain stable depends on the species being evaluated and on the toxicological
endpoint underlying the toxicity benchmark, and reliable characterization of the impact of a
chemical stressor on an exposed population risks requires knowledge of population size, birth
rates, and death rates, as well as immigration and emigration rates. Because this type of detailed
knowledge of population dynamics is generally not available on a site-specific basis,
extrapolation from a distribution of individual risks to a characterization of population-level
risks is generally uncertain. However, if all or nearly all of the HQs for individuals in a
population of receptors are below 1, it is very unlikely that unacceptable population-level effects
will occur in the exposed population. Conversely, if many or all of the individual receptors have
HQs that are above 1, then unacceptable effects on the exposed population are likely, especially
if the HQ values are large. If only a small portion of the exposed population has HQ values that
exceed 1, some individuals may be impacted, but population-level effects are not likely to occur.
As the fraction of the population with HQ values above 1 increases, and as the magnitude of the
exceedences increases, risk that a population-level effect will occur also increases. This concept
is illustrated schematically in Figure 4-2.
In interpreting HQ values and distributions of HQ values, it is always important to bear in mind
that the values are predictions, and are subject to the uncertainties that are inherent in both the
estimates of exposure and the estimates of toxicity benchmarks. Therefore, HQ values should be
interpreted as estimates rather than highly precise values, and should be viewed as part of the
weight-of-evidence along with the results of site-specific toxicity testing and direct observations
on the structure and function of the receptor community (see below).
4.4.2 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests
Site-specific toxicity tests measure the response of receptors that are exposed to site media. This
may be done either in the field or in the laboratory using media collected on the site. The chief
advantage of this approach is that site-specific conditions which can influence toxicity are
usually accounted for. A potential disadvantage is that, if toxic effects are observed to occur
when test organisms are exposed to a site medium, it is usually not possible to specify which
chemical or combination of chemicals is responsible for the effect. Rather, the results of the
toxicity testing reflect the combined effect of the mixture of chemicals present in the site
medium. In addition, it is often difficult to test the full range of environmental conditions which
may occur at the site across time and space, either in the field or in the laboratory, so these
studies are not always adequate to identify the boundary between exposures that are acceptable
and those that are not.
January 3, 2005 17
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
4.4.3 Population and Community Demographic Observations
A third approach for evaluating impacts of environmental contamination on ecological receptors
is to make direct observations on the receptors in the field, seeking to determine whether any
receptor population has unusual numbers of individuals (either lower or higher than expected), or
whether the diversity (number of different species) of a particular category of receptors (e.g.,
plants, benthic organisms, small mammals, birds) is different than expected. The chief
advantage of this approach is that direct observation of community status does not require
making the numerous assumptions and estimates needed in the HQ approach. However, there
are also a number of important limitations to this approach. The most important of these is that
both the abundance and diversity of an ecological population depend on many site-specific
factors (habitat suitability, availability of food, predator pressure, natural population cycles,
meteorological conditions, etc.), and it is often difficult to know what the expected
(non-impacted) abundance and diversity of an ecological population should be in a particular
area. This problem is generally approached by seeking an appropriate "reference area" (either the
site itself before the impact occurred, or some similar site that has not been impacted), and
comparing the observed abundance and diversity in the reference area to that for the site.
However, it is sometimes quite difficult to locate reference areas that are truly a good match for
all of the important habitat variables at the site, so comparisons based on this approach do not
always establish firm cause-and-effect conclusions regarding the impact of environmental
contamination on a receptor population.
4.4.4 Weight of Evidence Evaluation
As noted above, each of the measurement endpoints has advantages but also has limitations. For
this reason, conclusions based on only one method of evaluation may be misleading. Therefore,
the best approach for deriving reliable conclusions is to combine the findings across all of the
methods for which data are available, taking the relative strengths and weaknesses of each
method into account. If the methods all yield similar conclusions, confidence in the conclusion
is greatly increased. If different methods yield different conclusions, then a careful review must
be performed to identify the basis of the discrepancy, and to decide which approach provides the
most reliable information.
January 3, 2005 18
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
5 RISK EVALUATION FOR AQUATIC RECEPTORS
As discussed in Section 4, site-related contaminants may be of concern to aquatic receptors
(benthic macroinvertebrates) in Pine Creek (WA7) and at several run-off ponds near the former
smelter area (WAS and WA4). Benthic invertebrates living in Pine Creek and the run-off ponds
may be exposed to site-related contaminants through several potential pathways. As shown in
the site conceptual model (Figure 4-1), the following exposure pathways were selected for
quantitative evaluation.
Direct contact with chemicals dissolved or suspended in surface water. This pathway is
most applicable to benthic organisms that reside in the uppermost portion of the sediment
substrate or the water column.
• Direct contact with chemicals in sediment that have dissolved into the interstitial water
(porewater) occupying the spaces between sediment particles. This pathway is most
applicable to benthic invertebrate species that live buried within the sediment substrate.
5.1 Direct Contact with Surface Water
In the SLERA (USEPA, 2003a), chemical concentrations in surface water were compared to
screening-level toxicity benchmarks for aquatic receptors for both acute and chronic exposures
using a Hazard Quotient (HQ) approach. This comparison helped to identify the chemicals in
surface water that were of potential concern (COPCs) and required further evaluation.
Chemicals and water quality parameters that were selected as COPCs in the SLERA are
presented below.
Pine Creek
Beryllium
Cadmium
Nitrite
TDS
Run-off Ponds
Alkalinity
Aluminum
Manganese
Cadmium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Table 5-1 provides a summary of the surface water HQs as calculated in the SLERA. Figure 5-1
provides a schematic map of surface water sampling locations in Pine Creek and the run-off
ponds that were included in this evaluation.
For Pine Creek, HQs were below a level of concern for most samples for most COPCs.
Concentrations of beryllium and nitrite were slightly above the chronic toxicity benchmark in
lanuary 3, 2005
19
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
two samples, but exceedences did not appear to be spatially or temporally correlated. Overall,
risk estimates indicated that surface water in Pine Creek was not likely to have either acute or
chronic effects on benthic invertebrates.
For the run-off ponds, estimated risks to benthic invertebrates were above a level of concern for
several COPCs based on both the acute and chronic toxicity benchmarks. Concentrations of
aluminum, cadmium, copper, lead, silver, and zinc were above the acute benchmark at one or
more ponds. Risk estimates indicated that surface water in the run-off ponds may be acutely
toxic to benthic invertebrates. It is important to note that the surface water toxicity benchmarks
used in the SLERA were intended to be protective of a variety of aquatic species, some of which
may not be present at the run-off ponds.
No additional surface water samples have been collected since the SLERA, so further
characterization of potential risks to benthic invertebrates from direct contact with surface water
using the HQ approach was not possible.
5.2 Direct Contact with Sediment
5.2.1 HQ Evaluation Based on Bulk Sediment Benchmarks
In the SLERA (USEPA, 2003a), chemical concentrations in bulk sediment were compared to
screening-level toxicity benchmarks for benthic invertebrates using an HQ approach. This
comparison helped to identify COPCs in sediment which required further evaluation.
Chemicals that were selected as COPCs for sediment in the SLERA are presented below.
Pine Creek
Antimony Lead
Arsenic Mercury
Cadmium Silver
Copper Zinc
Run-off Ponds
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Table 5-2 provides a summary of the bulk sediment HQs as calculated in the SLERA. Figure 5-
1 provides a schematic map of sediment sampling locations in Pine Creek and the run-off ponds
that were included in this evaluation.
For Pine Creek, estimated risks were above a level of concern for all COPCs in one or more
sediment samples. In general, risks tended to increase with increasing distance downstream in
Pine Creek and were highest in the marshy areas. For the run-off ponds, with the exception of
January 3, 2005
20
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
aluminum, manganese, and nickel, estimated risks were above a level of concern for all COPCs
in one or more samples. The risk estimates presented in the SLERA indicated that sediments in
Pine Creek and the run-off ponds may be toxic to benthic invertebrates.
As discussed previously in the SLERA, estimated risks based on bulk sediment concentrations
were uncertain because the toxicity benchmarks used to calculate HQs did not account for site-
specific factors that may influence bioavailablility. In order to better characterize risks to
benthic invertebrates from sediment, new data were collected to provide better information on
site-specific bioavailability and toxicity of metals in sediment at the IS&R site. These data are
described in the following sections.
5.2.2 SEM/AVS Evaluation
For sediment-dwelling benthic invertebrates, the primary risk driver for metals in sediment is the
concentration of dissolved metals in the sediment porewater rather than the bulk sediment
concentration. Studies by a number of researchers have found that the tendency of metals in
sediment to dissolve into the porewater is determined in large part by the amount of sulfide
present in the sediment (Hansen et al., 1996; Ankley, 1996; Ankley et al., 1996). This is because
divalent cations of heavy metals such as cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, nickel, and mercury form
highly insoluble complexes with sulfides. Thus, if the sediment contains sufficient sulfide to
complex the metals, then dissolution into porewater and resultant toxicity to benthic organisms is
not expected.
Based on these considerations, one way to evaluate the risk to benthic organisms from metals in
sediments is to measure the amount of acid-extractable cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, nickel, and
mercury (these are referred to as Simultaneously Extractable Metals, or SEM) and compare this
to the level of Acid Volatile Sulfide (AVS). If the measured level of SEM (umol/g) is the same
or less than AVS (umol/g), then it is expected that porewater concentrations of metals will be
low and that toxicity to benthic organisms will not be of concern. If the concentration of SEM
exceeds the concentration of AVS, then toxicity may occur. However, there are other materials
in sediment (e.g., organic carbon) which also tend to bind metals (Mahony et al., 1996; Hansen
et al., 1996), so an exceedence of AVS by SEM is not proof that toxicity will definitely occur,
especially if the exceedence is fairly small (e.g., less than about 5 umol/g).
Table 5-3 presents the SEM and AVS results for two bulk surficial sediment samples which were
collected from Pine Creek at two locations just below the WA2 slag pile during the 2003
ecological field investigation. As seen, SEM slightly exceeds AVS at both locations. However,
this excess is sufficiently small (less than 2 umol/g) such that other binding agents may attenuate
January 3,2005 21
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
exposures from any metals that may leach into sediment porewater. Based on these results,
metals in sediments at these locations are not expected have significant adverse impacts on
sediment-dwelling benthic invertebrates.
SEM and AVS were not measured for sediments from the Pine Creek marshy areas or the run-off
ponds because these locations were dry at the time of sample collection (fall of 2003).
5.2.3 Sediment Porewater Evaluation
As noted previously, adverse effects from direct contact with sediment are likely to be mediated
primarily by chemicals that have dissolved into sediment porewater from the bulk sediment.
Thus, another more direct approach for evaluating toxicity from chemicals in sediment is to
measure the concentrations in the sediment porewater and compare those concentrations to
water-based toxicity values. For porewater, the HQ is the ratio of the measured porewater
concentration to an appropriate water toxicity benchmark, as follows:
HQ = Exposure Concpw / Benchmark^
where:
Concpw = chemical concentration in sediment porewater (ug/L)
Benchmark^ = chemical toxicity benchmark for water (ug/L)
The following sections describe the inputs used to calculate HQs and summarize the predicted
risks to benthic invertebrates from sediment porewater.
5.2.3.1 Exposure Assessment
Since there may be both spatial and temporal variability in sediment porewater concentrations at
any specific sampling station, exposure to benthic macroinvertebrates is usually best
characterized as a distribution of concentration values at a specific location. However, at this
site, there is only one measurement of porewater available at each of two sampling locations, so
exposure was based on the single concentration value at each station. The two stations sampled
(01 SED and 02 SED) were located in Pine Creek just below the WA2 slag pile. As noted
above, because toxicity to aquatic receptors from water exposure is dominated by the level of
dissolved chemicals, exposures to inorganics in sediment porewater were evaluated using
dissolved concentrations.
January 3, 2005 22
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Sediment porewater samples were not collected from the Pine Creek marshy areas or the run-off
ponds because these locations were dry at the time of sample collection (fall of 2003).
5.2.3.2 Toxicity Assessment
Toxicity benchmarks specifically for the protection of benthic invertebrates from contaminants
in surface are not generally available, so benchmarks for the protection of aquatic communities
(including fish, benthic invertebrates, aquatic plants, etc.) from direct contact with chemicals in
surface water were used. Appendix C provides detailed information on the sources and selection
procedure for these surface water toxicity benchmarks.
Two different types of toxicity benchmark were selected. The acute toxicity benchmark is
intended to protect against short-term (48-96 hour) lethality, while the chronic toxicity
benchmark is intended to protect against long-term effects on growth, reproduction, and survival.
For some metals, water hardness can affect metal toxicity (higher hardness tends to decrease
bioavilability and hence toxicity). Because hardness was not measured in the sediment
porewater, hardness-dependant benchmarks were calculated assuming the sediment porewater
hardness was similar to that measured in the overlying water for Pine Creek (200 mg/L). If
actual sediment porewater hardness is lower than 200 mg/L, toxicity benchmarks will be lower
and estimated risks will be higher than predicted.
5.2.3.3 Risk Characterization
Table 5-4 summarizes the aqueous toxicity benchmarks, the measured sediment porewater
concentrations, and the estimated HQs for each metal analyzed. As seen, HQs were below a
level of concern for all COPCs except aluminum. For aluminum, concentrations were slightly
above the chronic toxicity benchmark for both samples.
In order to further evaluate the significance of the chronic HQ values for aluminum, the toxicity
data used to derive this benchmark were reviewed. The Ambient Water Quality Criteria report
for aluminum (USEPA, 1988) states that the Final Chronic Value was lowered from 748 ug/L
(based on Daphnia magna) to 87 ug/L to protect brook trout and striped bass. Because brook
trout and striped bass are not present at this site, a chronic value of 748 ug/L is likely to be more
appropriate. Based on this benchmark, porewater concentrations of aluminum were below a
level of concern.
January 3, 2005 23
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
5.3 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests
One way to help reduce the uncertainty associated with risk predictions based on the HQ
approach is to perform direct toxicity testing using site-specific media. Tests of this type have
been performed to investigate the toxicity of site sediments on benthic organisms, using
sediment samples collected from four locations on Pine Creek. Two stations (01 SED and 02
SED) were located just below the WA2 slag pile and two stations were located in the marshy
areas (03 SED and 04 SED). For each sampling station, a 10-day subchronic survival and
growth toxicity test using the amphipod (Hyalella azteca) and chironomid (Chironomus tentans)
was conducted in accord with standard protocols. The toxicity test results are summarized in
Table 5-5.
As seen, no significant decreases in survival were seen for any of the Pine Creek sediment
samples in either the Hyalella azteca test or the Chironomus tentans test. Statistically significant
decreases in growth were seen for sediment samples from the marshy areas (03 SED and 04
SED) in the Hyalella azteca test compared to the sand control. Sediment toxicity tests were not
performed for the run-off ponds.
These findings support the conclusion that sediments in Pine Creek are not likely to be causing
significant adverse effects on survival of benthic receptors. However, chronic exposure to
sediments in the marshy areas may have adverse impacts on growth in some sensitive
invertebrate species.
5.4 Population and Community Demographic Observations
Information on the benthic invertebrate community in Pine Creek is limited to one sample
collected from the marshy area located downstream of the slag pile in October 2002. This
sample found representatives of the following taxa: Oligochaeta (worms), Plecoptera (stone
flies), Trichoptera (caddisflies), Coleoptera (beetles), Diptera (flies), Chironomidae (midge
flies), Gastropoda (snails), Odonata, Anisoptera (damselflies), Colembola (spring tails), and
Hydracarina (water mites) (AECI, 2003a).
Because this study was restricted to a single sample (representing only one location in Pine
Creek at one point in time), and because benthic community data from a suitable reference area
were not available, it is not possible to draw conclusions from this survey as to whether the
diversity and/or density of invertebrates are similar to what is expected. However, the fact that a
number of different benthic taxa were observed suggests the sediment from Pine Creek is
suitable for at least some species of invertebrates.
January 3, 2005 24
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
No survey data are available on the types of aquatic organisms (if any) that occur in the run-off
ponds. At the time of the ecological field investigation in the fall of 2003, the ponds were dry.
5.5 Weight of Evidence Summary
As described in Section 4, the best approach for deriving reliable conclusions regarding risk to a
group of ecological receptors is to combine the findings across all of the evaluation methods for
which data are available, taking the relative strengths and weaknesses of each method into
account. This approach is referred to as a weight of evidence evaluation. The individual lines of
evidence which were evaluated for aquatic receptors in Pine Creek and the run-off ponds are
summarized in Tables 5-6 and 5-7, respectively. The overall conclusions based on this weight of
evidence evaluation are summarized below.
Pine Creek
As seen in Table 5-6, several lines of evidence were available which provide information on
potential risks to aquatic receptors in Pine Creek. HQ values based on surface water suggest that
Pine Creek is not likely to have either acute or chronic impacts on aquatic receptors. HQ values
based on the bulk sediment benchmarks suggest that sediments in Pine Creek could adversely
impact benthic invertebrates, but this conclusion is not supported by several other lines of
evidence. More specifically, results from the SEM/AVS evaluation, sediment porewater HQs,
and the sediment toxicity tests all suggest that benthic invertebrates exposed to sediments in Pine
Creek are not likely to experience either acute or chronic adverse effects on growth or survival.
Toxicity testing of sediments from the marshy areas near Pine Creek suggests that growth may
be decreased in sensitive invertebrate species such as Hyalella azteca, but it is unlikely that
growth impacts to sensitive organisms would result insignificant population-level effects on
density or diversity of aquatic receptors in Pine Creek. Based on the weight of evidence, it is
concluded that risks of population-level effects to benthic organisms in Pine Creek are minimal.
Because multiple lines of evidence are available, confidence in this conclusion for aquatic
receptors in Pine Creek is moderate to high.
Run-Off Ponds
As seen in Table 5-7, two lines of evidence were available which provide information on
potential risks to aquatic receptors in the run-off ponds. Surface water HQs indicate that
concentrations of several metals in surface water at the run-off ponds are likely to be acutely
toxic to aquatic receptors. Bulk sediment HQs indicate that metals in sediments from the run-off
ponds may also adversely impact sediment-dwelling benthic invertebrates. These lines of
January 3, 2005 25
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
evidence both support conclusion that the run-off ponds are likely to be toxic to benthic
invertebrates. However, HQs for surface water and sediment are based on limited data collected
during a single sampling event. In addition, predicted risks from sediment are based on bulk
toxicity benchmarks which, at this site, have been demonstrated to be generally overprotective,
although the degree to which these benchmarks are overprotective is unknown. Therefore,
confidence in this conclusion is low to moderate.
However, even assuming that the run-off ponds are acutely toxic to aquatic receptors, it is
unlikely that impacts to biota in the run-off ponds will alter the overall aquatic community health
when evaluated on a site-wide basis. This is because these ponds are currently intermittent in
nature (expected to exist only a few weeks to months each year), and hence they are unlikely to
constitute a critical part of the aquatic ecosystem at the site.
January 3, 2005 26
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
6 RISK EVALUATION FOR TERRESTRIAL RECEPTORS
The structure and function of the plant and terrestrial invertebrate community is important
because it provides a significant portion of the energy, organic matter, and nutrient inputs for
terrestrial systems as well as providing habitat and forage for a variety of wildlife species. As
noted previously, because plants and terrestrial invertebrates reside directly in the soil and are
generally not mobile, direct contact with soil is the exposure pathway of chief concern.
6.1 Predictive Approach
6.1.1 HQ Evaluation Based on Bulk Soil Benchmarks
In the SLERA (USEPA, 2003a), chemical concentrations in bulk soils were compared to
screening-level toxicity benchmarks for plants and soil organisms. As discussed in the SLERA,
widespread and potentially severe phytotoxicity and soil organism toxicity were predicted for
most metals for every WA at the IS&R site at both Non-AOC and AOC locations. However, as
discussed in the SLERA, these results are not considered reliable because toxicity benchmarks
for many metals were below typical Utah background ranges. Because toxicity is not expected
to occur in un-impacted soils, it seems likely that the toxicity benchmarks used to calculate HQ
values for most of the chemicals do not account for site-specific soil conditions (bioavailability,
pH, organic carbon, etc.) and are likely to be overprotective at this site.
6.1.2 Other Predictive Models
Because of the low confidence in the screening-level HQ values, several alternative predictive
toxicity models were investigated in the SLERA (USEPA, 2003a). These models attempt to
provide increased predictive power by considering more than the total bulk soil concentrations.
The three different predictive models were utilized to provide better estimates of risks for plants
and soil invertebrates at the IS&R site. The SLERA provided detailed descriptions of each
model. A brief summary of each model is provided below.
Suave et al. (2000) developed regression equations using the measured bulk copper and
lead concentrations in soil and soil pH to estimate the free metal concentrations in the
soil solution. The free metal activity was then used to predict the expected percent
inhibition of the plant and soil organism communities and microbial processes.
PTI (1994) investigated the quantitative relationship between the level of mine tailings
contamination in soil from riparian areas along the Clark Fork River in Montana and
January 3, 2005 27
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
measurement endpoints of plant biomass and species richness. A bivariate model based
on "total metal" content (i.e., the sum of the concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper,
lead and zinc) and soil pH was used to compare predicted site measurement endpoint
values to plant biomass and species richness at a control site.
Kapustka et al. (1995) conducted several plant toxicity tests using soils from the
Anaconda Superfund site in Montana and three different agricultural crops (alfalfa,
lettuce, and wheat). Based on a plot of the bivariate relation between pH, total metal
levels (the sum of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc), a phytotoxic threshold was
established.
Table 6-1 provides a summary of the results from each predictive model, as presented in the
SLERA, stratified into Non-AOC and AOC locations. As seen, conclusions differed somewhat
between models, but in general, these models suggested that plant and soil organism
communities may be adversely impacted in some Non-AOC locations and that metals in soils
were likely to have adverse effects, severe in some cases, on terrestrial receptors in AOC
locations.
6.2 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests
No tests have been conducted to evaluate the effects of exposures of plant or terrestrial
invertebrate species to soils from the IS&R Site.
6.3 Population and Community Demographic Observations
6.3.1 Terrestrial Plants in Non-A OC Locations
As described previously in Section 2, the IS&R site was divided into five zones based on plant
community types, physical disturbances due to mining activities, and reclamation history (see
Figure 2-2) as follows:
Zone 1: Mountain Shrub without Disturbances (includes WAs 1 and 5)
Zone 2: Mountain Shrub with Disturbances (includes WAs 2, 3, 4 and 6)
Zone 3: Sagebrush-Grass Steppe with Revegetated Tailings Facilities (includes WAs 8 and 11)
Zone 4: Pine Creek Canyon Riparian Area (includes WA7)
Zone 5: Sagebrush-Grass Steppe without Disturbances (includes WAs 9 and 10)
Within each of these five vegetative zones, several of the Non-AOC soil sampling locations were
selected for the purposes of quantifying plant canopy cover, relative species coverage, and
January 3,2005 28
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
biomass. Plant community metrics were collected from 23 stations in December 2002 and 12
stations in July 2003 (AECI, 2004b). The December inventory was representative of flora in the
winter, and the July inventory was representative of flora during the growing season. In addition
to the five on-site zones, a reference area was also sampled. This reference area was located on
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands north of the IS&R site, and is expected to be
representative of a plant community that is similar in habitat to the IS&R site but that has not
been impacted by mining-related activities.
Plant species inventory, coverage determinations, and composition estimates are detailed in
Appendix D and summarized in Table 6-2. In order to judge whether the plant community has
been impacted by mining activities at the IS&R site, several alternate approaches were evaluated
which provided information on the nature of plant communities and the soil conditions at the
site. Each of these evaluations are summarized below.
6.3.1.1 Plant Community Metric Comparison to Native Conditions
The plant community composition observed within each of the five on-site zones was compared
to pre-settlement natural plant communities using the Range Condition Method (Holechek,
2001). The habitat type for most of the IS&R site is characterized as Mountain Big Sagebrush
(USDA, 2000). For this rangeland cover type, the most abundant native shrub is mountain big
sagebrush and the understory is comprised of a variety of perennial grasses and forbs. The
average annual production of this native habitat type varies from 1,000 to 2,500 pounds per acre
depending upon site quality (Tisdale, 1994).
The observed plant community composition and biomass estimates for each on-site zone were
compared to the expected pre-settlement conditions for Mountain Big Sagebrush range type
habitat (AECI, 2003a). Each area was assigned a rating based on a comparison of the observed
site community composition to that of the expected native community composition as follows:
% of Native Composition
Range Condition Score
< 26%
Poor
26% - 50%
Fair
51% -75%
Good
> 75%
Excellent
Table 6-3 Panel A summarizes the results of the Range Condition Method evaluation. In
interpreting these data, it is important to recall that large portions of WAs 2, 3, 4 and 6 in Zone 2
and WAs 8 and 11 in Zone 3 have been remediated (WAs are shown in Figure 3-1). The soils in
these remediated areas were covered with borrow material and seeded with perennial grasses,
forbs and shrubs.
January 3,2005 29
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
As seen, the range condition scores were generally highest in Zone 2 and Zone 3 both based on
species composition as a function of coverage and biomass contribution. These scores suggest
that where revegetation of the physically impacted areas has occurred, the plant communities are
more similar to the expected native community than in untreated areas. While the perennial
grasses in Zones 2 and 3 have established well, shrub species have yet to establish in many areas.
It is anticipated that range condition scores for these remediated areas will improve as the shrubs
become better established. For those zones that have not been revegetated, range condition
scores were generally "poor" to "fair", which is not unexpected due to historic grazing pressures.
Because of livestock overgrazing, many of the once dominant perennial grasses, forbs and shrubs
have been replaced by low serai and exotic plant species (AECI, 2003a).
One limitation of the Range Condition Method is that scores are based only on plant species
composition estimates, and may not reflect adverse impacts to plant coverage or production. For
example, consider the case where the expected native community is characterized as 75% of
species "A" and 25% of species "B" with a typical coverage of 45% and production yield of
1,000 Ib/acre. A site with composition estimates of 75% of species "A" and 25% of species "B"
with only 10% coverage and production yield of 100 Ib/acre would receive a high score, even
though the other metrics suggest the site is adversely impacted. Similarly, a site with
composition estimates of 5% of species "A" and 95% of species "B" with 56% coverage and
production yield of 1,200 Ib/acre would receive a lower score.
6.3.1.2 Comparison to Reference Area
In order to account for possible changes in the plant community that may not be accounted for in
the Range Condition Method, site-specific measures of diversity, coverage, and biomass were
compared to measured values from the off-site BLM reference area. This reference area did not
include a representative riparian area, so site plant community metrics from Pine Canyon (Zone
4) were not included in this comparison.
Table 6-3 Panel B provides a summary of the number of plant species (diversity), coverage, and
living biomass estimates for both the BLM reference area and the site zones. In the December
2002 evaluation, estimates of diversity and coverage in most IS&R site zones were lower than
the BLM reference area. In the July 2003 evaluation, species diversity in Zone 1 (WAS) and
Zone 5 were significantly lower than the BLM reference. In addition, coverage estimates for
Zone 2 (15.4%) and Zone 3 (5.4%) were significantly lower than the BLM reference. Because
living biomass measurements were usually only available for one sublocation per sampling
station, a rigorous statistical comparison could not be performed. However, it appears that
biomass estimates for Zone 3 (399 Ib/acre) are both lower than the BLM reference and lower
January 3,2005 30
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
than expected yields for a typical Mountain Big Sagebrush habitat (1,000 to 2,500 Ib/acre).
The plant community data from the IS&R site suggest that the plants on site may be adversely
impacted, especially in Zones 2 and 3 (the former smelter area and impoundment), compared to
the BLM reference area. It is important to recognize that a comparison of site to reference is
limited by the fact that the reference area, while similar to the IS&R site, may not account for all
of the important habitat variables that can influence plant community metrics. As such,
comparisons to reference do not always establish firm cause-and-effect conclusions regarding
the impact of soil contamination on the plant community. Because plant community metrics are
only available from two sampling events, it is not possible to rule out the effects of each of the
potential variables (e.g: soil contamination, soil nutrient levels, annual precipitation, grazing
effects, etc.) or to establish plant community trends and expected variability over time.
6.3.1.3 Correlation of Plant Community Metrics to Measured Soil Concentrations
One possible reason for the apparent decreases in species diversity, cover, and biomass
compared to the reference area is that elevated levels of contaminants in soils are causing
phytotoxicity. In order to test the hypothesis that soil contamination is responsible for the effects
on the plant community, measured bulk metal concentrations in soil were compared to plant
community metrics. Table 6-4 presents the measured soil concentrations of bulk metals across
several depth intervals for the stations evaluated as part of the plant inventory. The depth-
weighted average soil concentration for each chemical was plotted graphically as a function of
each plant community metric. Figure 6-1 presents an example of these graphs for arsenic.
Appendix E provides figures for each of the 23 bulk metals analyzed in soil and pH.
Table 6-5 Panel A presents a count of the number of correlation analyses (across chemicals and
across locations) that were statistically (p <0.05) less than zero (i.e., as concentration increased,
the plant metric tended to decrease). As seen, in a majority of all cases, there was no
statistically significant correlation between plant community metrics and measured bulk soil
concentrations of most metals. Although a few significant correlations were seen, there was no
consistent pattern across sampling events or across plant metrics. This lack of apparent
correlation between bulk metal concentrations in soil and plant community metrics supports the
view that variability in bulk metal concentrations is not the primary determinant of plant
community status, but does not exclude metals as a potential contributor to phytotoxicity. For
example, it is possible that a correlation may exist between phytotoxicity and soluble metals in
soil porewater, or between phytotoxicity and metals, pH, and organic carbon levels, etc.
January 3,2005 31
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
6.3.1.4 Evaluation of Soil Nutrient Levels
Another factor that might contribute to an apparent decrease in plant community status on-site
compared to the reference area is that on-site soils may be limiting for plant growth due to
poorer soil nutrient levels than in the reference area. Nutrient levels were measured in site soils
from plant community sampling locations using a DTPA extraction method, which provides
biologically available concentrations of several metals required for optimal plant growth. Table
6-6 presents the measured nutrient levels in soils from several on-site locations. Unfortunately,
no comparable data were obtained in the reference area, so a direct test of the hypothesis that the
on-site soils have poor nutrient levels compared to the reference area is not possible.
One potential method for evaluating the importance of soil nutrients is to compare observed on-
site nutrient levels to levels that are generally considered optimal. However, it is expected that
soils in arid areas of Utah may tend to be partially deficient in some nutrients (e.g., organic
matter), so this comparison is not considered to be diagnostic.
A second approach for assessing the importance of soil nutrients on plant growth is to determine
whether there is an observable correlation between plant nutrients in on-site soils and the plant
community metrics. If nutrients are growth limiting, then there should be a tendency for plant
metrics to improve in locations where nutrients are higher than average. The soil nutrient levels
were plotted graphically as a function of each plant community metric. Figure 6-2 presents an
example of these graphs for extractable iron. Appendix E provides figures for each of the 10 soil
nutrient parameters.
Table 6-5 Panel B presents a count of the number of correlation analyses (across chemicals and
across locations) that were statistically (p <0.05) greater than zero (i.e., as concentration
increased, the plant metric also tended to increase). As seen, plant metrics measured in
December 2002 or July 2003 do not appear to correlate with most soil nutrient parameters. This
lack of correlation between soil nutrient levels and plant community metrics suggests that
inadequate soil nutrient levels are not likely to be the primary factor responsible for limitations
in plant community health.
6.3.2 Terrestrial Plants inAOC Locations
A total of 450 areas of concern (AOCs), together comprising approximately 2% of the total site
area, were identified as part of the IS&R site walkover (AECI, 2002b). While many AOCs
simply designate the presence of mining debris or erosional gullies, several AOCs identify areas
with visually stressed or absent vegetation, some of which are associated with the presence of
January 3, 2005 32
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
exposed tailings. Approximately 20% of the 450 AOCs (79 stations) were selected for
supplemental soil sampling. Based on the visual observations recorded for each of these 79
AOC locations, approximately 35% of these AOCs where characterized as having absent,
visually stressed, or sparse vegetation, or areas of bare soil. Assuming that observations of
exposed soil and/or tailings were also indicative of stressed vegetation, about 72% of all AOCs
represent locations where the plant community is adversely impacted. Because measurements of
plant community metrics were not available for AOC locations, quantitative correlations with
measurements of bulk soil concentrations could not be performed. However, these observations
are consistent with the predictive model results in Section 6.1.2 which indicated severe toxicity
to plants in AOCs.
6.3.3 Terrestrial Invertebrates and Soil Organisms
No information has been collected for either Non-AOCs or AOCs on the terrestrial invertebrate
community, soil organism community, or condition of soil microbial processes at the IS&R site.
6.4 Weight of Evidence Summary
Plant Communities in Non-AOC Locations
Table 6-7 summarizes the six individual lines of evidence that were available to evaluate impacts
to terrestrial plants in Non-AOC areas at the IS&R site. As seen, predictive estimates of risk
(HQ and predictive phytotoxicity models, as presented in the SLERA) suggest that plant
communities may be slightly impacted at most of the site due to metals in soil. This prediction is
consistent with a comparison of site-specific plant community metrics to an off-site reference
area, which indicates that species diversity, coverage, and biomass are lower than reference in
several of the on-site zones. Plant community metrics do not show an observable correlation
with measured bulk soil concentrations of metals. Although this is not strong evidence that
metals, alone or in combination with other variables (e.g., pH), are unimportant, it does suggest
that the contribution of metals is not the primary factor contributing to variations in plant
community health at the IS&R site. Data do not allow a direct comparison of nutrient levels in
site soils and the reference area, it seems likely that limitations in nutrient levels are not a major
contributor to the apparent decrease in plant community status. Thus, the weight of evidence
suggests that metals in soils from Non-AOCs are likely contributing to a decrease in plant
community health at the site, but the magnitude of the effect compared to other factors that
influence plant community status is likely to be relatively low. Because multiple lines of
evidence are generally consistent, confidence in this conclusion is moderate. If further
evaluation is required, laboratory-based comparisons of plant growth in site soil and an
January 3, 2005 33
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
appropriate reference soil would provide valuable information on the potential role of metals in
the observed decreases plant community health at the IS&R site.
Plant Communities in AOC Locations
Table 6-8 summarizes the two individual lines of evidence which were evaluated for terrestrial
plants in AOC areas at the IS&R site. As seen, predictive risk estimates (HQs and predictive
toxicity models, as presented in the SLERA) suggest that metals in soils from AOC locations are
likely to be severely toxic to plants. This line of evidence is supported by the observations of the
AOC site walkover which indicated that many AOCs are associated with absent or sparse
vegetation, often in association with the presence of exposed tailings. However, quantitative
measurements of plant community metrics in AOC locations were not available, and a more
rigorous evaluation of correlation between soil concentrations of metals and plant community
health could not be performed. Although the data for AOCs are limited, both lines of evidence
support the conclusion that metals in soils from AOCs are severely impacting plants in these
locations. Therefore, confidence in this conclusion is moderate.
Terrestrial Invertebrates and Soil Organisms in Non-AOC and AOC Locations
Only one line of evidence was available to characterize potential risks to terrestrial invertebrates
and soil organisms at the IS&R site. Predictive estimates of risk initially presented in the
SLERA suggested that terrestrial invertebrates and soil organism communities may be slightly
impacted in Non-AOCs and severely impacted in AOCs due to metals in soil. Because there are
no other lines of evidence available to support this conclusion, the confidence in the conclusion
is low. In order to better assess the accuracy of these risk predictions, other lines of evidence,
such as site-specific toxicity assessments or community surveys, would be needed.
January 3, 2005 34
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
7 RISK EVALUATION FOR WILDLIFE RECEPTORS
As discussed previously in Section 4, the SLERA evaluated risks to terrestrial and
aquatic/semi-aquatic wildlife and concluded that ingestion exposures from most media were
potentially above a level of concern for several ingestion exposure pathways. This section
presents a re-evaluation of risks to wildlife based on new data that were collected on the
concentration of site-related chemicals in terrestrial food web items (plants and terrestrial
invertebrates). Although no new data were collected on contaminant levels in surface water, soil
or sediment, risks to wildlife from these media were also re-evaluated in this Baseline ERA to
provide a more detailed assessment of the degree of variability and uncertainty in the predicted
risks.
7.1 HQ Approach
7.1.1 Basic Equation
The basic equation used for calculation of an HQ value for exposure of a wildlife receptor to a
chemical by ingestion of an environmental medium is:
TT_ Cona, j x (IRj,r/BWr)x DFj,r
HUi, i,r =
TRVi,r
where:
HQijr = HQ for exposure of receptor "r" to chemical "i" in medium "j"
Cy = Concentration of chemical "i" in medium "j" (e.g., mg/kg wet weight)
IRj r = Intake rate of medium "j" by receptor "r" (e.g., kg wet weight/day)
BWr = Body weight of receptor "r" (kg)
DFjr = Dietary fraction of medium "j" by receptor "r" derived from site
TRVir = Oral toxicity reference value for chemical "i" in receptor "r" (mg/kg-d)
Because all wildlife receptors are exposed to more than one environmental medium, the total
Hazard Quotient (Total HQ) to a receptor from a specific chemical is calculated as the sum of
HQs across all media:
Total HQi,r =
January 3, 2005 35
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Accounting for Variability in HQ Estimates
Variability refers to heterogeneity or diversity that occurs within a population (USEPA, 2001).
Wildlife exposures, and hence predicted risks, will vary among different individuals within the
same population for two main reasons:
• Differences in behavior between different individuals. For example, some individuals
may eat more soil, or may ingest more of a particular type of food item than other
individuals.
• Differences in the concentration of contaminant encountered in the environment and food
web. Note that this source of variation is applicable only to receptors that are immobile
or have relatively small home ranges compared to the size of the exposure area, and not
to receptors that move at random across the exposure area.
Thus, there is normally a wide range of exposures between different members of an exposed
population. Because of this, exposure calculations must specify what part of the range of doses
is being estimated. Typically, attention is focused on two different parts of the exposure
distribution:
Average or "Central Tendency" Exposure (CTE) is representative of the typical
exposure.
Upper-Bound or "Reasonable Maximum" Exposure (RME) is the highest exposure
that is reasonably expected to occur at a site. The intent of the RME is to estimate a
conservative exposure case that is still within the range of possible exposures.
The CTE dose is calculated using the average or median values for all of the exposure
parameters. The RME dose is calculated by setting one or more exposure parameters to "high
end" values such that the resulting daily dose is representative of a reasonable upper-bound dose.
In general, the exposure parameter(s) set at high end value(s) are for those variable(s) that
explain the greatest variation between individuals.
Accounting for Uncertainty in HQ Estimates
Risk estimates are also uncertain because the quality, quantity, and representativeness of
available data on environmental concentrations and exposure parameters are usually inadequate
to define the "true" value (USEPA, 2001). Uncertainty in exposure parameters (e.g., food
January 3,2005 36
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
ingestion rate, body weight, dietary fraction) for CTE and RME receptors is usually addressed
qualitatively. Uncertainty in the concentration term can be addressed quantitatively by
calculating an Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) on the estimate of the statistic of interest (e.g., the
95% UCL on the mean concentration).
Range ofHQ Values
Because of the variability and uncertainty in the calculation of exposure and risk, there is no
single HQ value that can be identified to represent the risks to a population of receptors. Rather,
risk is better thought of as a range of values that spans both variability and uncertainty. In this
Baseline ERA, four different types of HQ were calculated:
Variability
Average (CTE) receptor
High end (RME) receptor
Uncertainty
Best Estimate
HQ Type A
HQ Type B
Upper Bound
HQ Type C
HQ Type D
Selection of Input Parameters for Each HQ Type
In this Baseline ERA, the approach used for addressing variability and uncertainty varied based
on the relative size of the receptor home range. This is because in cases of receptors with small
home ranges (e.g., deer mouse), variation in concentration in site media (soil, plants, etc.) is
likely to be the largest contributor to variation in exposure and variation due to behavior can
often be ignored. This means that for a small home range receptor, the RME receptor is
represented by an individual that lives at a location representative of an upper-bound soil
concentration. In contrast, for a large home range receptor, variation in environmental
concentration is not a source of variation (because exposure is averaged over the whole site), so
the RME receptor is represented by an individual that has high end intake rates.
Determining which intake rate should be set to an RME value depends upon which exposure
pathway tends to contribute most to predicted risks and is chemical-specific. In cases where a
receptor ingests only one type of dietary item (e.g., 100% plants), the soil ingestion will tend to
contribute most to predicted risks.
The statistic of interest for exposure concentrations in environmental media varies depending
upon the HQ Type. Although it is unlikely that concentrations in every medium are all
simultaneously at the high end of their uncertainty distributions, upper-bound estimates of
January 3, 2005
37
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
concentration in all dietary items were evaluated at the UCL on the statistic of interest for the
purposes of simplifying risk calculations. As a result, total dose values are likely to be
overestimated.
Table 7-1 summarizes the approach used in this Baseline ERA for calculating each type of HQ
for both large and small home range receptors.
7.1.2 Exposure Assessment
Selection of Representative Wildlife Species
It is not feasible to evaluate exposures and risks for each bird and mammal species potentially
present at the IS&R Site. For this reason, several species were selected to serve as representative
species (surrogates) of several different feeding guilds. Selection criteria for representative
wildlife species include trophic level, feeding habits, and the availability of life history
information. Representative wildlife receptors selected for the IS&R Site include:
Feeding Guild
Aerial
Insectivore
Aquatic
Insectivore
Terrestrial
Omnivore
Terrestrial
Insectivore
Herbivore
Carnivore
Representative Species
Mammal: Big Brown Bat
Bird: Cliff Swallow
Bird: Mallard
Mammal: Masked Shrew, Deer Mouse
Bird: American Robin
Bird: Northern Flicker
Bird: Mourning Dove
Mammal: Mule Deer
Bird: Red-tailed Hawk
Mammal: Red Fox
Exposure Pathways
Ingestion of sediment, emerging aquatic
invertebrates, and flying insects
Ingestion of sediment, aquatic plants and
aquatic invertebrates
Ingestion of soil, plants, terrestrial
insects, and soil invertebrates
Ingestion of soil, terrestrial insects, and
soil invertebrates
Ingestion of soil and plants
Ingestion of soil and small mammals
Wildlife Exposure Factors
Exposure parameters and dietary intake factors for each surrogate wildlife receptor were derived
from the Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook (USEPA, 1993b), as well as a variety of other
sources. Wildlife exposure factors were selected to represent average year-round adult
lanuary 3, 2005
38
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
exposures. When possible, exposure information was limited to receptor data from Utah or a
representative western state. In some cases, no quantitative data could be located, so
professional judgement was used in selecting exposure parameters. The dietary fraction (df)
estimates were based on the average across all seasons. In the Baseline ERA, it was assumed
that all of the receptor home range was located within the IS&R Site boundary and 100% of the
total dietary intake came from within the site.
The CTE exposure parameters selected for each representative wildlife receptor are detailed in
Appendix F and summarized in Table 7-2. As noted previously, CTE exposure parameters are
all intended to be average or median values.
Table 7-3 provides the RME exposure parameters selected for each representative wildlife
receptor. As seen, in the case of most medium to large home ranges, the soil/sediment ingestion
rate was set to an upper-bound estimate because the diet is comprised of only one type of food
item. For the red fox, three alternate RME scenarios were plausible (high soil ingestion, high
small mammal ingestion, high plant ingestion). Therefore, Total HQs for each alternate scenario
were calculated and the maximum HQ across the three scenarios was used as the RME. Recall
that for small home range receptors, the RME individual resides at a location with high-end
concentration and does not depend upon the selection of an upper-bound exposure parameter.
Site-Specific Bioaccumulation Models
As noted earlier, concentrations of several metals were measured in plants and in terrestrial
invertebrates as part of the Fall 2003 field investigation (AECI, 2003b). Because the purpose of
this tissue collection effort was to develop site-specific bioaccumulation models, sampling
locations were selected across multiple WAs which encompassed a wide range of soil
concentrations (as measured in during the 2001-2002 RI sampling efforts). Grasses, forbs and
shrubs from 27 locations and terrestrial invertebrates from 22 locations were collected and
analyzed for aluminum, antimony, arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury2, and selenium. Plant stems
and leaves were cut at ground level and were not rinsed prior to analysis (AECI, 2004a). The
terrestrial invertebrate samples consisted of small beetles, spiders, small bees and flies, and some
small grasshoppers (AECI, 2004a).
Bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) and uptake models are based on the assumption that the uptake
of a specified contaminant into tissues is directly related to the concentration of the contaminant
2 Mercury analysis could not be performed for terrestrial invertebrate tissue samples due to
insufficient sample mass.
January 3,2005 39
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
in soil. Hence, as concentrations in soil increases, concentrations in tissues are also expected to
increase. In order to characterize this relationship, measured tissue concentrations were plotted
as a function of the measured bulk surficial soil concentration for each sampling location.
Appendix G provides graphs for each tissue type for each metal analyzed. For each graph,
estimated tissue concentrations are also shown based on the default uptake models provided by
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (BJC, 1998 or Sample et al., 1998) and based on the uptake
factors presented in the northern Oquirrh Mountain ERA for the Kennecott Utah copper mine
(ep&t, 1996).
Inspection of the graphs in Appendix G reveals little, if any, correlation between the measured
concentrations in bulk soil and the measured concentrations in plants and invertebrates. In other
words, the tissue concentrations were generally similar across all locations, regardless of the
underlying soil concentrations. In addition, measured plant and terrestrial invertebrate
concentrations were not well characterized by either the default uptake models provided by Oak
Ridge National Laboratory or the uptake factors presented in the northern Oquirrh Mountain
ERA. These results indicate that, at the IS&R site, the bulk concentration of metals in soil is not
a reliable indicator of uptake into tissues. This is not unexpected, as it is well known that other
factors such as soil pH, total organic carbon content of the soil, cellular and microbial processes,
can greatly influence uptake of inorganic chemicals into plant and invertebrate tissues. As a
result, site-specific BAFs for uptake into plants and terrestrial invertebrates were not calculated.
Exposure Point Concentrations for Non-AOCs
Appendix H provides a summary by WA of chemical concentrations in surface water, sediment,
soil, and food items used in the Baseline ERA to estimate risks to wildlife from Non-AOC
locations. Exposure point concentrations were calculated for each individual WA and across all
WAs based on the consolidated site-wide Non-AOC dataset for each exposure medium.
As described in the above section, measured plant and terrestrial invertebrate tissue
concentrations were collected from Non-AOC locations in several WAs and were analyzed for a
subset of metals. As discussed above, the ability to predict tissue concentrations from bulk soil
values at the IS&R site is likely to be poor. Therefore, higher confidence is placed on measured
concentrations than estimated concentrations. Rather than combine across measured and
estimated data, food ingestion pathways were not evaluated for those chemicals that were not
measured. Because no measured data were available for aquatic food items and small mammals,
exposures from these food items were also not evaluated.
January 3, 2005 40
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Because measured plant and terrestrial invertebrate concentrations did not appear to correlate
strongly with soil concentrations, WA exposure point concentrations for these food items were
calculated based on data compiled across the entire site. In accord with USEPA guidance, non-
detects were evaluated at one-half the detection limit (USEPA, 1989).
Exposure Point Concentrations for AOCs
Recall that at the IS&R Site, each WA contains areas that can be classified as either Non-AOC
or AOC. Although the AOCs comprise only about 2% of the entire site area, they are still an
important source of exposure and were evaluated separately in this Baseline ERA (see Section
7.1.5). Because measured food item concentrations were not evaluated in AOCs, the only
exposure pathway that could be evaluated was incidental ingestion of soil. Appendix H provides
a summary by WA of chemical concentrations in soil used in the Baseline ERA to estimate risks
to wildlife from AOCs. Exposure point concentrations were calculated for each individual WA
and across all WAs based on the consolidated site-wide dataset for AOC soils.
7.1.3 Toxicity Assessment
Wildlife Toxicity Reference Values
A Toxicity Reference Value (TRV) for wildlife provides an estimate of the dose (in units of mg
of chemical per kg of body weight per day, mg/kg/day) associated with a known effect. Often,
two types of dose-based TRVs are identified. The first TRV is an estimate of the dose that is not
associated with any adverse effects, and is referred to as the no observed adverse effect level
(NOAEL) TRV. The second TRV is an estimation of the dose that causes an observable adverse
effect, and is referred to as the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) TRV. This range
of TRVs is one way to bracket the true threshold for adverse effects.
It is expected that the adverse effect threshold will vary from species to species within any
particular taxonomic group. If data are available of the effects thresholds for many different
species in a particular group, the data may be rank-ordered to define a species-sensitivity
distribution (SSD) for that group. In order to ensure that the HQs calculated for each
representative species are protective of most species within the group, a TRV which represents
the lower end of the SSD is preferred. Ideally, toxicity data would be sufficient to define the
SSD and support derivation of a TRV for each unique feeding guild selected for evaluation (e.g.,
avian omnivores, mammalian herbivores, etc.). Unfortunately, available toxicity data for birds
and mammals are generally not robust enough to develop SSDs for each feeding guild, so a
single bird TRV and mammal TRV were used to represent all bird and mammal species,
January 3,2005 41
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
respectively.
Because the purpose of the Baseline ERA is to evaluate wildlife exposures from ingestion of
contaminated media at the IS&R Site over the lifetime of the receptor, TRVs were derived from
studies in which the exposure route was oral (e.g., via ingestion in diet or water or via gavage),
and dosing occurred over a long period of time (chronic exposure) or during a critical lifestage
period. The wildlife TRVs were selected to represent relevant toxicity endpoints for population
sustainability (e.g., growth, reproduction, mortality).
TRVs for wildlife were compiled from three secondary sources (shown in order of preference):
USEPA (2003b), Engineering Field Activity West (1998), and Sample et al. (1996). Appendix C
provides a summary of the TRV derivation approach and the bird and mammal TRVs selected by
each secondary source. The TRVs provided in each of these sources are described briefly below.
In USEPA (2003b), a single bird TRV and mammal TRV was derived which represents the
highest no effect level below the level which effects are first observed across multiple species
and endpoints. Risk calculations in the Baseline ERA used this TRV without adjustment.
In Engineering Field Activity West (1998) and Sample et al. (1996), two types of TRV are
provided for both birds and mammals. Risk calculations in the Baseline ERA were based on the
geometric mean of the selected NOAEL (or Low TRV in Engineering Field Activity West, 1998)
and LOAEL (or High TRV). This geomean value was used as an estimate of the threshold dose
level where adverse effects first begin to occur in exposed organisms. If only a NOAEL was
available, this value was used to represent the effects threshold.
Table 7-4 summarizes the mammal and bird TRVs that were used to evaluate potential risks to
representative wildlife species.
Relative Bioavailability
TRVs from literature studies are generally expressed in units of ingested dose (mg of chemical
per kg of body weight per day, mg/kg/day). However, the toxicity of an ingested dose depends
on how much of the ingested dose is actually absorbed, which in turn depends on the properties
of both the chemical and the exposure medium. Ideally, toxicity studies would be available that
establish empiric TRVs for all site media of concern (water, food, soil, sediment). However,
most laboratory tests use either food or water as the exposure medium, and essentially no studies
use soil or sediment. Therefore, in cases where a TRV is based on a study in which the oral
absorption fraction is different that what would be expected for a site medium, it is desirable to
January 3, 2005 42
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
adjust the TRY to account for the difference in absorption whenever data permit.
The ratio of absorption from the study medium compared to absorption from site medium is
referred to as the relative bioavailability (RBA). The RBA is used to adjust the TRY as follows:
TRV(adjusted) = TRV(literature) / RBA
For the purposes of this Baseline ERA, it was assumed that chemicals are absorbed equally well
from all site media and the RBA was equal to 1.0 (100%). This approach is likely to be realistic
for contaminants in water and most food web items, but may tend to overestimate exposure and
risk from ingestion of soil or sediment. However, no site-specific information on RBA was
available which would provide a basis to modify this assumption.
7.1.4 Risk Characterization for Non-A OCs
Appendix I provides the detailed risk calculations of each of the four different types of HQ for
each wildlife receptor for each chemical of potential concern at each WA. Each table (one table
per receptor per HQ Type) shows the predicted Total HQ values for each chemical for each
exposure pathway for each WA. HQs were calculated for both Non-AOC and AOC locations
separately. This section focuses on predicted risks in Non-AOCs and the following section
(Section 7.1.5) presents the predicted risks from AOCs.
In addition to calculating HQs for the IS&R site, soil HQs were also calculated for Utah
background3. A comparison of predicted site risks relative to predicted reference risks helps to
identify cases where predicted risks are above a level of concern not only at the site but also at
the reference area. In this case, it is possible that the exposure and/or the toxicity assumptions
for the chemical are overly conservative, since risks are not expected to be of concern in
non-impacted reference areas.
Tables 7-5a to 7-5k (one table per wildlife receptor) provides a summary of the estimated risks
for each chemical of potential concern at each WA for Non-AOC locations. Table 7-6
summarizes the soil HQs for Non-AOCs for each chemical for each receptor across all WAs. In
these tables, the range of Total HQs from least conservative to most conservative (Type A to
Type D) are presented, and HQ values greater than 1 are shaded. Interpretation of wildlife HQs
depends upon the range of estimated risks across each of the HQ Types (A, B, C, and D). If
estimated risks are below a level of concern for all HQ Types, the chemical is not likely to
3 Reference soil HQs were based on data for Utah provided by Shacklette and Boerngen (1984).
January 3, 2005 43
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
adversely impact the represented wildlife receptor class. If estimated risks are above a level of
concern for all HQ Types, the chemical is likely to be adversely impacting the represented
wildlife receptor class. If estimated risks across HQ Types range from below 1 to above 1, risks
to the represented wildlife receptor class may be of potential concern but the results are more
difficult to interpret. If the HQ exceedence is small or if HQ exceedences occur only for the
most conservative exposure estimate (HQ Type D), some individuals may be impacted, but
population-level effects are not likely to occur. As the magnitude of the HQ exceedence
increases, the risk that a population-level effect will occur also increases.
Primary Contributors to Predicted Risks
Table 7-7 summarizes the metals of potential concern relative to Utah background for each
receptor in each WA from Non-AOC locations. Identification of the exposure pathway(s) that
contribute to predicted risks depends upon the chemical, the exposure area, and the HQ Type and
requires inspection of the detailed HQ calculations (as provided in Appendix I). For example, in
Table 7-7 selenium and lead are two of several metals identified as in a range of potential
concern for the deer mouse. Table 7-8 provides an example for the deer mouse of the detailed
exposure pathway HQ values for selenium and lead for each of the HQ Types (A, B, C, and D).
Figure 7-1 provides a graphical summary of estimated risks to the deer mouse from selenium and
lead by HQ Type across all site WAs.
As seen in Table 7-8 (Panel A), estimated risks to the deer mouse from ingestion of selenium in
soil and surface water were below a level of concern for all HQ Types across all WAs.
Estimated risks from ingestion of selenium in plant and invertebrate tissues were above a level of
concern for most HQ Types. Estimated site-wide risks indicate that small omnivorous mammals
at the IS&R site are likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion of selenium in the diet.
Estimated risks to the deer mouse from lead (Table 7-8 Panel B) in surface water, plants, and
terrestrial invertebrates were below a level of concern for HQ Types A, B, and C at all WAs.
Estimated risks from incidental ingestion of lead in soil were above a level of concern for several
WAs by HQ Types B, C, and D, but not by HQ Type A. Estimated site-wide risks indicate that
small omnivorous mammals at the IS&R site may be slightly impacted due to ingestion of lead.
However, if a receptor with higher than average exposure were to preferentially feed in WAs
with elevated lead levels, these individuals are more likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion
of lead in soil.
January 3, 2005 44
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
General Conclusions
The magnitude of the predicted risks to wildlife based on the HQ approach depend upon many
factors (e.g., species, chemical, exposure area, exposure pathway). However, the following
general conclusions regarding potential adverse impacts to wildlife were drawn based on a
review of the detailed HQs in Appendix I.
• Risks to birds and mammals from ingestion of surface water in Pine Creek and the run-
off ponds are below a level of concern for all wildlife receptors.
• Risks to carnivorous and herbivorous wildlife with larger home ranges (e.g., fox, hawk,
deer) were generally below a level of concern for all chemicals and exposure pathways
when evaluated across the entire IS&R site.
• Risks to waterfowl were above a level of concern for both the run-off ponds (WAS) and
Pine Creek (WA7). The primary contributor to predicted risks was incidental ingestion
of lead in sediment.
• Risks to insectivorous birds and mammals were above a level of concern in all WAs for
one or more chemicals. For medium home range receptors (e.g., swallow, bat, flicker),
the primary contributors to predicted risks were often cadmium and selenium in
terrestrial invertebrates and lead in soil. For small home range receptors (e.g., shrew,
robin), multiple metals in terrestrial invertebrates and soil contributed to predicted risks.
• Risks to herbivorous and omnivorous birds and mammals were above a level of concern
in all WAs. For these wildlife receptors (e.g., dove, mouse), exposure to selenium in
plants and lead in soil tended to contribute most to predicted risks.
It is important to remember that several exposure pathways and chemicals were not included in
these risk estimates (see footnotes in Table 7-5). For example, because small mammal
concentrations were not measured, risks to carnivorous wildlife from ingestion of small
mammals were not included in the Total HQ estimate. Measured tissue data were collected only
for those exposure pathways (ingestion of plants and invertebrates) and contaminants identified
in the SLERA as the primary contributors to predicted risks. This contaminant list included
many of the metals that are expected to bioaccumulate in the food web (e.g., cadmium,
selenium). However, exclusion of secondary exposure pathways and chemicals in the
calculation of Total HQs may tend to underestimate predicted risks.
January 3, 2005 45
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
7.7.5 Risk Characterization for A OCs
A total of 450 areas of concern (AOCs), which together comprise approximately 2% of the total
site area, were identified as part of the IS&R site walkover (AECI, 2002b). These AOCs were
designated based on the presence of mining debris, erosional gullies, visually stressed or absent
vegetation, and/or exposed tailings.
Appendix J provides the detailed risk calculations for each of the four different types of HQ
value for each wildlife receptor for each chemical of potential concern at each WA, based on the
(relatively unlikely) scenario that exposure occurs only at locations that are AOCs. Each table
(one table per receptor per HQ Type) shows the predicted soil HQ values for each chemical for
each exposure pathway for each WA. Because AOCs were only identified for terrestrial
habitats, risks to waterfowl were not included in the AOC evaluation.
Table 7-9 summarizes the soil HQs for AOCs for each chemical for each receptor across all
WAs. As seen, estimated risks to terrestrial wildlife from exposure to soils from AOC locations
were above a level of concern for most receptors due to elevated concentrations of several metals
in soil. Risks tended to be higher for receptors with small home ranges, and the highest
estimated risks were usually due to ingestion of lead. These predicted risks suggest that, if
preferential exposure of a receptor at AOCs were to occur, wildlife receptors may be adversely
impacted due to incidental ingestion of metals in soil.
7.2 Site-Specific Toxicity Tests
No site-specific toxicity tests were available which evaluate wildlife exposures to environmental
media from the IS&R Site.
7.3 Population and Community Demographic Observations
Quantitative measurements of wildlife populations and community metrics are not available for
the IS&R Site.
7.4 Weight of Evidence Summary
Only one line of evidence (the HQ approach) was available to evaluate risks to wildlife receptors
from contaminants in environmental media at the IS&R site.
January 3, 2005 46
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Large Home Range Receptors
Table 7-10 provides a summary of the HQ evaluation for each exposure pathway for birds and
mammals with large home ranges. As seen, HQs for large home range receptors from ingestion
of surface water, soil, and terrestrial food items from Non-AOC locations are generally below a
level of concern for all chemicals. For AOCs, soil HQs indicate that there is the potential for
slight impacts due to elevated levels of metals, if RME receptors were to preferentially feed in
these areas. However, given the small spatial extent of AOCs relative to the total home range
size, this exposure scenario is unlikely.
Based on this one line of evidence, it is concluded that populations of large home range wildlife
receptors are not likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion of metals in contaminated media at
the IS&R site. While risks based on the HQ approach are uncertain due to limitations in the
assessment of exposure and toxicity, predicted risks tend to be conservative and are more likely
to overestimate, rather than underestimate, potential risks. Because risks to large home range
receptors are predicted to be below a level of concern, there is moderate confidence in this risk
conclusion.
Small/Medium Home Range Receptors
Table 7-11 provides a summary of the HQ evaluation for each exposure pathway for birds and
mammals with small/medium home ranges. As seen, surface water HQs for all receptors were
below a level of concern. However, based on the estimated HQs for Non-AOCs, concentrations
of several metals in sediment, soil, plants, and terrestrial invertebrates were above a level of
concern for wildlife receptors with small to medium home ranges. In addition, soil ingestion
HQs for AOCs indicate that if a receptor were to reside and feed primarily in these areas,
elevated levels of multiple metals may cause significant adverse effects. Because the likelihood
that a home range could include all or part of an AOC is higher for small/medium home range
receptors than for large home range receptors, the contribution of AOC locations to the overall
risk also could be high for small home range receptors.
Based on this one line of evidence, it is concluded that populations of small/medium home range
wildlife receptors are likely to be adversely impacted by ingestion of metals in contaminated
media from both Non-AOCs and AOCs at the IS&R site. As stated previously, estimated risks
based on the HQ approach are uncertain due to limitations in both the exposure and toxicity
assessments and are likely to be biased high. Although it is likely that estimated risks are lower
than predicted, the magnitude of this overestimation is unknown. Because there are no other
lines of evidence available to support the conclusion that populations of small/medium home
January 3, 2005 47
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
range receptors are adversely impacted at the site, there is low confidence in this risk conclusion.
In order to better assess the accuracy of these risk predictions, other lines of evidence, such as
site-specific toxicity assessments or community surveys, would be needed.
January 3, 2005 48
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
8 UNCERTAINTIES
Quantitative evaluation of ecological risks is generally limited by uncertainty regarding a
number of important data. This lack of knowledge is usually circumvented by making estimates
based on whatever limited data are available, or by making assumptions based on professional
judgement when no reliable data are available. Because of these assumptions and estimates, the
results of the risk calculations are themselves uncertain, and it is important for risk managers and
the public to keep this in mind when interpreting the results of a risk assessment.
The following text summarizes the key sources of uncertainty influencing the results of this
Baseline ERA.
8.1 Uncertainties in Nature and Extent of Contamination
8.1.1 Representativeness of Samples Collected
Concentration levels of chemicals in environmental media are often quite variable as a function
of location, and may also vary significantly as a function of time. Thus, samples collected
during a field sampling program may or may not fully characterize the spatial and temporal
variability in actual concentration levels. At this site, field samples were collected in accord
with sampling and analysis plans that specifically sought to ensure that samples were
representative of the range of conditions across each exposure area. However, in some locations,
the number of samples collected was relatively small. Thus, without the collection of very large
numbers of samples over both space and time, some uncertainty remains as to whether the
samples collected provide an accurate representation of the distribution of concentration values
actually present.
8.1.2 Accuracy of Analytical Measurements
Laboratory analysis of environmental samples is subject to a number of technical difficulties,
and values reported by the laboratory may not always be exactly correct. The magnitude of
analytical error is usually small compared to other sources of uncertainty, although the relative
uncertainty increases for results that are near the detection limit.
January 3, 2005 49
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
8.2 Uncertainties in Exposure Assessment
8.2.1 Pathways Not Evaluated
Exposure pathways selected for quantitative evaluation in this Baseline ERA do not include all
potential exposure pathways for all ecological receptors. Exposure pathways that were not
evaluated include:
• Ingestion of sediments and prey items by benthic invertebrates
• Dermal exposures of wildlife to soil, sediment and surface water
• Inhalation of dust particles by wildlife
• Ingestion of benthic invertebrates and small mammals by wildlife
• Exposures by amphibians and reptiles
Omission of these pathways will tend to lead to an underestimation of total risk to the exposed
receptors. As discussed previously in Section 4, many of these exposure pathways (i.e., dermal
exposures of wildlife) are likely to be minor compared to other pathways that were evaluated,
and the magnitude of the underestimation is not likely to be significant in most cases. However,
the exclusion of some exposure pathways may tend to underestimate predicted risks in some
cases.
An example of this is ingestion of prey items by benthic invertebrates. Although the general
consensus is that uptake of inorganic contaminants from food is usually less than from direct
contact with water (Clements, 1991), available data are sufficient to indicate that the ingestion
pathway can be an important source of exposure to some aquatic receptors (Timmermans et al.,
1992), and that dietary exposures can be capable of limiting growth in at least some cases
(Duddridge and Wainwright, 1980). Thus, omission of the ingestion pathway for aquatic
receptors is likely to be a minor source of uncertainty in most cases, but could lead to an
underestimate in some cases.
The exclusion of wildlife exposures via ingestion of benthic invertebrates and mammals may
also lead to an underestimate of predicted risks in waterfowl and carnivorous wildlife. In
addition, risks to amphibians and reptiles were not evaluated quantitatively in this Baseline ERA.
The comparability of predicted risks for wildlife to those expected for amphibian and reptilian
receptors is uncertain.
January 3,2005 50
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
8.2.2 Chemicals Not Detected
Any chemical that was never detected in a site medium was not evaluated in exposures of
receptors to that medium. However, in some cases, the analytical detection limit was too high to
expect the chemical would have been detected even if it were present at the level of concern.
COPC were selected in the SLERA (USEPA 2003a) and chemicals in this category were
assigned as Type 2 Qualitative COPCs. Table 8-1 identifies the Type 2 Qualitative COPCs.
Omission of these chemicals is likely to result in an underestimation of risk. However, it is
suspected that the magnitude of the underestimation is likely to be low in most cases. This is
because, if the non-detected chemical were actually site-related and were present at a level of
substantial health concern, it likely would have occurred at levels above the detection limit at
least a few times. Thus, while the hazard from Type 2 Qualitative COPCs is unknown, it is
probably not large enough to cause a substantial underestimation of risk.
8.2.3 Exposure Area Concentration Values
In all exposure calculations, the desired input parameter is the true mean concentration of a
chemical within a medium, averaged over the area where random exposure occurs. However,
because the true mean cannot be calculated based on a limited set of measurements, the USEPA
(1989, 1992) recommends that the exposure estimate be based on the 95% upper confidence
limit (95UCL) of the statistic of interest. This approach is intended to ensure that exposure and
risk estimates are likely to be conservative (i.e., overestimate risk). When data are plentiful and
inter-sample variability is not large, the 95UCL may be only slightly higher than the statistic of
interest, and the degree of overestimation may be minor. However, when data are sparse or are
highly variable, the 95UCL may be far greater than the statistic of interest, and the degree of
uncertainty and the extent of overestimation may be substantial.
In the wildlife receptor risk characterization, the exposure area concentration value depends
upon the desired level of confidence (best estimate, upper bound) and the type of receptor
(average, high end). The use of the upper 95UCL on the mean or the 90th percentile of the
concentration distribution helps ensure that HQ estimates Types C and D are more likely to be
high than low, especially when data are sparse or highly variable. The difference between the
best estimate and the upper bound estimate of HQ for a CTE or RME receptor (HQ Type A vs.
B, Type C vs. D) is a good indication of the magnitude of the uncertainty associated with the
exposure area concentration value for each chemical of potential concern.
January 3,2005 51
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
8.2.4 Wildlife Exposure Factors
The intake (ingestion) rates for food, soil, and sediment used to estimate exposure of wildlife at
the site are derived from literature reports of intake rates, body weights, dietary compositions,
consumption rates, and metabolic rates in receptors at other locations or from measurements of
laboratory-raised organisms. These values may or may not serve as appropriate models for
site-specific intake rates of average (CTE) and upper-end (RME) wild receptors at this site.
Moreover, the actual dietary composition of an organism will vary daily and seasonally. In
addition, some wildlife receptor-specific intake rates are estimated by extrapolation from data on
a closely related species or by use of allometric scaling equations (scaling of intake rates based
on body weights). This introduces further uncertainty into the exposure and risk estimates.
These uncertainties could either under- or overestimate the actual exposures of wildlife to
chemicals in soil, sediment, and diet.
For this analysis, it was also assumed that wildlife exposures were continuous and that receptor
home ranges were located entirely within the IS&R site (i.e., all of the total dietary intake was
from the site). In the case of resident small-home range receptors, these assumptions are likely
to be fairly realistic. However, these assumptions may tend to overestimate exposures in
receptors that have a large home range and that may not be exposed on-site most of the time.
8.2.5 A bsorption From Ingested Doses
The toxicity of an ingested chemical depends on how much of the chemical is absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract into the body. However, the actual extent of chemical absorption from
ingested media (soil, sediment, food, and water) is usually not known. The hazard from an
ingested dose is estimated by comparing the dose to an ingested dose that is believed to be safe,
based on tests in a laboratory setting. Thus, if the absorption is the same in the laboratory test
and the exposure in the field, then the prediction of hazard will be accurate. However, if the
absorption of chemical from the site medium is different (usually lower) than occurred in the
laboratory study, then the hazard estimate will be incorrect (usually too high). In this
assessment, estimates of wildlife exposure assumed a relative bioavailability (KB A) of 100% for
all chemicals in all media. This assumption is expected to be reasonable for chemicals in surface
water and most dietary food items, but may tend to overestimate exposure for exposure to
chemicals in soil and sediment. This is because metals in soil and sediment may occur in
mineral phases that have low solubility, and this tends to reduce the amount of metal that is
absorbed when ingested.
January 3, 2005 52
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
8.3 Uncertainties in Toxicity Assessment
8.3.1 Representativeness of Receptors Evaluated
Risk characterizations for aquatic receptors were based toxicity values which included a
generalized set of species found in freshwater aquatic communities. However, not all of these
species (e.g., fish) are expected to occur in waters at the IS&R site. Thus, HQ values above 1
may reflect risks to species that are absent at the site, and risks to species that are actually
present at the site may be lower.
Risks to wildlife were assessed for a small subset of the species likely to be present at the IS&R
site. Although the representative wildlife receptors selected represent a range of taxonomic
groups and life history types of species likely to occur in the area, these species may not
represent the full range of sensitivities present. The species selected may be either more or less
sensitive to chemical exposures than typical species located within the area.
8.3.2 A bsence of Toxicity Data for Some Chemicals
For a number of chemicals that were detected in one or more samples of site media, no reliable
toxicity benchmark could be located for one or more receptor types. COPC were selected in the
SLERA (USEPA 2003a) and chemicals in this category were assigned as Type 1 Qualitative
COPCs. Table 8-1 identifies the Type 1 Qualitative COPCs. The inability to evaluate hazard
from these chemicals is expected to result in an underestimation of risk, but it is suspected that
the magnitude of the error is usually likely to be low. This is because the absence of a toxicity
benchmark for a chemical is most often because toxicological concern over that chemical is low.
That is, chemicals that lack benchmarks are often considered to be relatively less hazardous that
those for which benchmarks do exist. To the extent that this is true (even though there are likely
some exceptions to this rule), risks from Type 1 Qualitative COPCs are likely not to contribute
risks of the same magnitude as those predicted for chemicals that do have a benchmark value.
8.3.3 Extrapolation of Toxicity Data Between Receptors
Toxicity data are not available for all of the species of potential concern at the site. Thus, it is
sometimes necessary to estimate toxicity values for a receptor by extrapolating toxicity data
across similar species. At this site, this extrapolation was direct: that is, no uncertainty factor
was used to adjust a benchmark form one species when applied to another. This approach may
either overestimate or underestimate the risk to the actual receptor, depending on whether the
actual receptor is less sensitive or more sensitive that the species for which data are available,
January 3, 2005 53
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
and the magnitude of the error could be significant in some cases.
8.3.4 Extrapolation of Toxicity Data Across Dose or Duration
In some cases, TRV data are available only for high dose exposures, and extrapolation to low
doses (similar to those that actually occur at the site) is a source of uncertainty. Likewise, some
TRVs are based on relatively short-term exposures, and extrapolation to long-term exposures is
uncertain, especially for chemicals that tend to build up in the exposed organism. When such
extrapolations are necessary, it is customary to include one or more "uncertainty factors" in the
derivation of the benchmark to account for the extrapolation. In general, these "uncertainty
factors" are likely to be somewhat too large, so the benchmarks derived in this way are more
likely to overestimate than underestimate true risk.
8.3.5 Extrapolation of Toxicity Data from Laboratory to Field Conditions
Even when toxicity data are available for a receptor of concern at the site, the data are usually
generated under laboratory conditions, and extrapolation of those data to free-living receptors in
the field is uncertain. One factor is that laboratory organisms are more homogeneous that wild
populations. For example, laboratory test populations are usually all the same genetic strain,
age, and gender, and all are usually healthy. In contrast, wild populations are genetically
diverse, consist of individuals of different ages and genders, and health status may vary widely
between individuals. In addition, laboratory animals are generally free from the stresses
experienced by a wild population. Because of these factors, extrapolation of dose-response data
and toxicity factors from laboratory species to wild populations is uncertain.. The magnitude
and direction of error introduced by this extrapolation is unknown. However, greater variability
in response to a chemical toxicant in wild populations that laboratory species is expected to
result in an underestimation of risk to RME individuals in a population.
8.4 Uncertainties in Risk Characterization
8.4.1 Interactions Among Chemicals
Most toxicity benchmark values are derived from studies of the adverse effects of a single
contaminant. However, exposures to ecological receptors usually involve multiple
contaminants, raising the possibility that synergistic or antagonistic interactions might occur.
However, data are generally not adequate to permit any quantitative adjustment in toxicity values
or risk calculations based on inter-chemical interactions. In accordance with USEPA guidance,
effects from different chemicals are not added unless reliable data are available to indicate that
January 3, 2005 54
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
the two (or more) chemicals act on the same target tissue by the same mode of action. At this
site, HQ values for each chemical were not added across different chemicals. If any of the
chemicals of concern at the site act by a similar mode of action, total risks could be higher than
estimated. Conversely, if the chemicals of concern at the site act antagonistically, total risks
could be lower than estimated.
8.4.2 Estimation of Population-Level Impacts
Assessment endpoints for the receptors at this site are based on the sustainability of exposed
populations, and risks to some individuals in a population may be acceptable if the population is
expected to remain healthy and stable. However, even if it is possible to accurately characterize
the distribution of risks or effects across the members of the exposed population, estimating the
impact of those effects on the population is generally difficult and uncertain. The relationship
between adverse effects on individuals and effects on the population is complex, depending on
the demographic and life history characteristics of the receptor being considered as well as the
nature, magnitude and frequency of the chemical stresses and associated adverse effects. Thus,
the actual risks that will lead to population-level adverse effects will vary from receptor to
receptor.
8.5 Summary of Uncertainties
Table 8-2 summarizes the various sources of uncertainty in this Baseline ERA, along with a
qualitative estimate of the direction and magnitude of the likely errors attributable to the
uncertainty. Based on all of these considerations, the HQ and Total HQ values calculated and
presented in this Baseline ERA should be viewed as having substantial uncertainty. Because of
the inherent conservatism in the derivation of many of the exposure estimates and toxicity
benchmarks, these HQ and Total HQ values should generally be viewed as being more likely to
be high than low, and results and conclusions should be interpreted accordingly.
January 3, 2005 55
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
9 REFERENCES
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2001. IS&R/Carr Fork Remedial Investigation -
Sampling and Analysis Plan: Part 1 - Field Sampling Plan, Part 2 - Standard Operating
Procedures, Part 3 - Quality Assurance Protection Plan. Prepared for ARCO Environmental
Remediation, LLC. September 2001.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2002a. IS&R/Carr Fork Remedial Investigation
- Data Summary Reports for Work Areas 1 through 11. Prepared for ARCO Environmental
Remediation, LLC. Multiple reports - March to December 2002.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2002b. Memo: Area of Concern Meeting
Summary. Memo from AECI to Joshua Knight re: February 5, 2002 teleconference call on areas
of concern identification. March 13,2002.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2003a. Draft Remedial Investigation.
Preliminary Subsections on the Flora and Fauna Communities (as provided on 3/31/03 and
4/15/03 for review and comment}.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2003b. IS&R/Carr Fork Remedial Investigation
- Data Summary Report for Eco-Risk Sampling. Prepared for ARCO Environmental
Remediation, LLC. November 2003.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2004a. Email from Kevin Cosper (AECI) to
Joshua Knight (EPA, RPM) RE: "Eco Risk Responses with Revised Table 3-3". February 24,
2004.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2004b. Email from Kevin Cosper (AECI) to
Joshua Knight (EPA, RPM) RE: "Clarification on Plant Community Question". March 15,
2004.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2004c. Memo from Steve Anderson (AECI) to
Joshua Knight (EPA, RPM) RE: Response to EPA Comments on Ecological Data Summary
Report. January 7, 2004.
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2004d. Memo from Steve Anderson (AECI) to
Joshua Knight (EPA, RPM) RE: Response to EPA Comments on Ecological Data Summary
Report. February 10, 2004.
January 3,2005 56
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Anderson Engineering Company, Inc. (AECI). 2004e. Email from Kevin Cosper (AECI) to
Joshua Knight (EPA, RPM) RE: "Eco Risk Files". April 29, 2004.
Ankley, G.T. 1996. Evaluation of Metal/Acid-Volatile Sulfide Relationships in the Prediction
of Metal Bioaccumulation by Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
15:2138-2146.
Ankley, G.T., D.M. Di Toro, DJ. Hansen and WJ. Berry. 1996. Technical Basis and Proposal
for Deriving Sediment Quality Criteria for Metals. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15:2056-2066.
Bechtel Jacobs Company, LLC (BJC). 1998. Empirical Models for the Uptake of Inorganic
Chemicals from Soil by Plants. Prepared for the US Dept of Energy by Oak Ridge National
Laboratory. Report BJC/OR-133. September 1998. Data also provided in: Efroymson, R.A.,
B.E. Sample, andG.W. Suter. 2001. Uptake of inorganic chemicals from soil by plant leaves:
Regressions of field data. Environ Tox Chem 20:2561-2571.
Clements, W.H. 1991. Community Responses of Stream Organisms to Heavy Metals: A
review of Observational and Experimental Approaches. In: Newman MC., Mclntosh AW
(eds.). Metal Ecotoxicology, Concepts and Applications. Lewis Publishers, pp 363-389.
Duddridge, J.E., and M. Wainwright. 1980. Heavy Metal Accumulation by Aquatic Fungi and
Reduction in Viability of Gammarus pulex Fed Cd+2-Contaminated Mycelium. Water Res.
14:1605-1611.
Engineering Field Activity, West. 1998. Development of Toxicity Reference Values for
Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments at Naval Facilities in California, Interim Final. EFA
West, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, United States Navy. San Bruno, California.
ecological planning and toxicology (ep&t). 1996. Ecological Risk Assessment for the Northern
Oquirrh Mountains. Final Report for Kennecott Utah Copper, Salt Lake City, UT. October
1996.
Hansen DJ, Berry WJ, Mahoney JD, Boothman WS, Di Toro DM, Robson DL, Ankley GT, Ma
D, Yan Q, Pesch CE. 1996. Predicting the Toxicity of Metal-Contaminated Field Sediments
Using Interstitial Concentration of Metal and Acid-Volatile Sulfide Normalizations. Environ.
Toxicol. Chem. 15:2080-2094.
January 3,2005 57
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Holechek, Jerry L., Rex D. Pieper, and Carlton H. Herbel. 2001. Range Management Principles
and Practices, Fourth Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kapustka LA, Lipton J, Galbraith H, Cacela D, LeJune K. 1995. Metal and Arsenic Impacts to
Soils, Vegetation Communities and Wildlife Habitat in Southwest Montana Uplands
Contaminated by Smelter Emissions: II. Laboratory Phytotoxicity Studies. Environ. Tox. Chem.
14:1905-1912.
Mahony, J.D., D. M. Di Toro, A.M. Gonzales, M. Curto, M. Dilg, L.D. De Rosa, and L. A.
Sparrow. 1996. Partitioning of Metals to Sediment Organic Carbon.. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
15:2187-2197.
PTI. 1994. Regional Ecorisk Field Investigation. Report prepared for Atlantic Richfield
Company by PTI Environmental Services, Bellevue, WA. November 1994.
Sample, B. E., D. M. Opresko, and G. W. Suter II. 1996. Toxicological Benchmarks for
Wildlife: 1996 Revision. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental
Management by Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(ORNL). ES/ER/TM-86/R3, June 1996.
Sample, B.E., J.J. Beauchamp, R.A. Efroymson, G.W. Suter, II, and T.L. Ashwood. 1998.
Development and Validation of Bioaccumulation Models for Earthworms. Prepared for the US
Dept of Energy by Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Report ES/ER/TM-220. February 1998.
Data also provided in: Sample, B.E., G.W. Suter, J.J. Beauchamp, andR.A. Efroymson. 1999.
Literature-derived bioaccumulation models for earthworms: Development and validation.
Environ Tox Chem 18:2110-2120.
Shacklette, H.T., and J.G. Boerngen. 1984. Element Concentrations in Soils and Other Surficial
Materials of the Conterminous Unites States. USGS Professional Paper 1270.
Tisdale, EW. 1994. Mountain Big Sagebrush. In: Rangeland Cover Types of the United States.
Society for Range Management, TN Shiflet (editor).
Suave, S, A Dumestre, M McBride, and W Hendershot. 2000. Derivation of Soil Quality
Criteria Using Predicted Chemical Speciation of Pb2+ and Cu2+. Environ. Tox. Chem
17(8):1481-1489.
January 3,2005 58
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Timmermans, K.R., E. Spijkerman, M. Tonkes, and H. Govers. 1992. Cadmium and Zinc
Uptake by Two Species of Aquatic Invertebrate Predators from Dietary and Aqueous Sources.
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49:655-662.
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR). 2002. Carr Fork Reclamation and Wildlife
Management Area, Management Plan Summary. November 2002.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2000. Soil Survey of Tooele Area, Utah.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), National
Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS).
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1988. Ambient Water Quality
Criteria for Aluminum - 1988. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water
Regulations and Standards. EPA/440/5-86/008. August 1988.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund. Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992. Framework for Ecological
Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum. EPA/630/R-92/001.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1997. Ecological Risk Assessment
Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments.
Interim Final. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emergency Response. EPA/540/R-
97/006. June 1997.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1998. Guidelines for Ecological
Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. April, 1998.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund: Volume III, Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
December 2001. EPA 540-R-02-002.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002a. National Recommended Water Quality
Criteria: 2002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of
Science and Technology. November 2002. EPA-822-R-02-047.
January 3,2005 59
-------
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003a. Screening Ecological Risk
Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site, Tooele County, Utah. Prepared by
Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC) for USEPA, Region VIII. Internal Review Draft - June
2003.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003b. Guidance for Developing Ecological
Soil Screening Levels (Eco-SSLs). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. OSWER
Directive 92857-55. November 2003.
January 3, 2005 60
-------
Table 2-1
Timeline of Mining, Reclamation, and Regulatory Activities
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Time frame
1910
1915
1946
1968
1972
1974
1981
March 1984
August 1984
Summer 1985
September 1985
October 1985
March 1986
Fall 1986 -
Spring 1987
1987-1989
April 1990
1990
April 1994
September 1995 -
February 1996
February 1999
April 1999
Fall 1999
July & October 1999
July 2000
December 2000
September 2001
Description of Activities
IS&R began operations; copper and lead smelter and lead-zinc flotation mill.
Anaconda (currently the Atlantic Richfield Company, ARCO) purchased the IS&R subsidiary.
IS&R copper smelter closed.
IS&R lead-zinc flotation mill closed.
IS&R lead smelter closed and smelter facility demolished.
Carr Fork began mine and mill operations.
Carr Fork mine and mill closed and facilities demolished.
Utah Division of Environmental Health, Bureau of Solid and Hazardous Waste conducted a
Preliminary Assessment (PA).
Utah Division of Environmental Health, Bureau of Solid and Hazardous Waste conducted an initial
Site Investigation (SI).
USEPA Region 8 Field Investigation Team (FIT) conducted additional SI studies.
Hazard Ranking Score (HRS) report concluded the pre-reclamation total site score was 9.27.
Carr Fork operations properties sold to Kennecott.
ARCO prepared Final Reclamation/Stabilization Plan and submitted to Utah Division of Oil, Gas &
Mining, Utah Division of Environmental Health, and Tooele County Planning Office.
Reclamation activities conducted (removal of remaining buildings and structures, consolidation of
waste materials, construction of storm water controls, placement of cover soil and revegetation over
majority of site).
Post-reclamation monitoring performed.
Summary report on site monitoring submitted to Utah Division of Oil, Gas & Mining.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas & Mining releases ARCO from further mining reclamation liability.
ARCO enters into conservation easement with Utah Division of Wildlife Resources to manage site
creating the Carr Fork Reclamation and Wildlife Management Area.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division, under agreement with USEPA, conducted an
Expanded SI.
HRS report concluded the total site score was 58.3 1.
USEPA proposed to list IS&R site on the National Priorities List (NPL).
Post-remediation monitoring and maintenance (mostly erosion control).
ARCO submitted two rounds of comments opposing proposed listing.
Final listing of IS&R site on the NPL; USEPA issues response to opposing comments from ARCO.
ARCO submits site Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation (RI) to USEPA.
ARCO submits Final Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for the RI to USEPA.
Source: AECI (2001)
-------
Table 2-2
Wildlife Species Identified or Expected to Occur at the IS&R Site
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Common Name
Vertebrate Taxa
Amphibians
Anurans (Toads & Frogs)
Great Basin Spadefoot
Western Toad
Woodhouse Toad
Reptiles
Saurians (Lizards)
Collared Lizard
Leopard Lizard
Desert horned Lizard
Short-horned Lizard
Side-blotched Lizard
Sagebrush Lizard
Western fence Lizard
Western Skink
Western Whiptail
Serpentines (Snakes)
Western Yellow-bellied Racer
Striped Whipsnake
Long-nosed Snake
Milk Snake
Ringneck Snake
Gopher Snake
Night Snake
Common Garter Snake
Western Terrestrial Garter Snake
Western Rattlesnake
Birds
Falconiformes (Birds of Prey)
Turkey Vulture
Bald Eagle
Northern Harrier
Sharp-shinned Hawk
Cooper's Hawk
Swain son's Hawk
Red-tailed Hawk
Ferruginous Hawk
Rough-legged Hawk
Scientific Name
Scaphiopus intermontanus
bufo boreas
Bufo woodhousei
Crotaphytus collaris
Crotaphytus wislizeni
Phynosoma platyrhinos
Phynosome douglassii
Ufa stansburiana
Sceloporus graciosus
Sceloporus occidentalis
Eumeces skilltonianus
Cnimidophorus tigris
Coluber constrictor
asticophis taeniatus
Rhinocheilus lecontei
Lampropeltis triangulum
Diadolphis puntatus
Pituophis melanoleucus
Hypsiglena torquata
Thamnophis sirtalis
Thamnophis elegans
Crotalis viridis
Cathartes aura
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Circus cyaneus
Accipiter stiatus
Accipiter cooperii
Buteo swainsoni
Buteojamaicensis
Buteo regalis
Buteo lagopus
Seasonal
Status1
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
S
W
R
R
R
S
R
R
W
Habitat
Preference2
SmRvRz
SmRvRz
SmRvRz
SmRvRz
SmRz
SmRz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
SmRz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRv
Page 1 of 6
-------
Common Name
Golden Eagle
American Kestral
Merlin
Peregrin Falcon
Prairie Falcon
Galliformes (Pheasants & Grouse)
Chukar
Ring-necked Pheasant
Wild Turkey
California Quail
Charadriiformes (Gulls and Shorebirds)
Long-billed Curlew
California Gull
Ring-billed Gull
Columbiformes (Pigeons & Doves)
Rock Dove
Mourning Dove
Strigiformes (Owls)
Western Screech Owl
Great Horned Owl
Long-eared Owl
Short-eared Owl
Caprimulgiformes (Goatsuckers)
Common Nighthawk
Common Poorwill
Apodiformes (Hummingbirds)
Black-chinned hummingbird
Broad-tailed Hummingbird
Rufous Hummingbird
Picaformes (Woodpeckers)
Downy Woodpecker
Northern Flicker
Passeriformes (Perching Birds)
Western Wood-Pewee
Willow Flycatcher
Hammond's Flycatcher
Dusky Flycatcher
Gray Flycatcher
Cordilleran Flycatcher
Say's Phoebe
Ash-throated Flycatcher
Western Kingbird
Northern Shrike
Scientific Name
Aquila chrysaetos
Falco sparverius
Falco columbarius
Falco peregrinus
Ifalco mexicanus
Alectoris chukar
Phasianus colchicus
Meleagris gallopavo
Callipepla califomica
Numenius americanus
Larus califomicus
Lams delawarensis
Columba livie
Zenaida macroura
Otus kennicottii
Bubo virginianus
Asia otus
Asio flammeus
Chordeiles minor
Phalaenoptilus nuttallii
Archilochus alexandri
Selasphorus platycercus
Selasphorus rufus
Picoides pubescens
Colaptes auratus
Contopus sordidulus
Empidonax traillii
Empidonax Hammondii
Empidonax oberholseri
Empidonax wrightii
Empidonax occidentalis
Sayomis soya
Myiarchus cinerascens
Tyrannus verticalis
Lanius excubitor
Seasonal
Status1
R
R
W
R
R
R
R
R
R
M
R
W
R
S
R
R
R
R
S
S
S
S
M
R
R
S
S
M
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
Habitat
Preference2
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRz
Rz
SmRz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRz
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
Page 2 of 6
-------
Common Name
Loggerhead Shrike
Cassin's Vireo
Plumbeous Vireo
Warbling Vireo
Western Scrub- Jay
Pinyon Jay
Black-billed Magpie
American Crow
Common Raven
Horned Lark
Tree Swallow
Violet-green Swallow
Northern Rough-winged Swallow
Bank Swallow
Cliff Swallow
Barn Swallow
Black-capped Chickadee
Mountain Chickadee
Juniper Titmouse
Bushtit
Red-breasted Nuthatch
Brown Creeper
Rock Wren
Bewick's Wren
House Wren
Marsh Wren
Ruby-crowned Kinglet
Blue-gray Gnatcher
Mountain Bluebird
Townsen's Solitaire
Swainson's Thrush
Hermit Thrush
American Robin
Cray Catbird
Northern Mockingbird
Sage Thrasher
European Starling
American Pipit
Bohemian Waxwing
Cedar Waxwing
Tennessee Warbler
Orange-crowned Warbler
Nashville Warbler
Virginia's Warbler
Yellow Warbler
Scientific Name
Lanius Ludovicianus
Vireo cassinii
Vireo plumbeous
Vireo givus
Amphelocoma coerulescens
Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus
Pica pica
Corvus brachyrhynchos
Corvus corax
Eremophila alpestris
Tchycinata bicolor
Tachycinata thalassina
Stelgidopteryx serripennis
Riparia riparia
Hirundo pyrrhonota
Hirundo rustica
Parus atricapittus
Parus gambeli
Baeolophus griseus
Psaltriparus minimus
Sitta canadensis
Certhia americana
Salpinctes obsoletus
Thryomanes bewickii
Troglodytes sedon
Cistothorus platensis
Regulus calendula
Polioptila caerulea
Sialia currucoides
Myadestes townsendi
Catharus ustulata
Catharus guttatus
Turdus migratorius
Cumetella carolinensis
Mimus polyglottos
Oreoscoptes montanus
Stumus vulgaris
Anthus rubecens
Bombycilla garrulus
Bombycilla cedrorum
Vermivora peregrina
Vermivora celata
Vermivora ruficapilla
Vermivora virginiae
Dendroica petechia
Seasonal
Status1
R
M
S
S
R
R
R
R
R
R
S
S
S
S
S
S
R
w
R
R
M
W
S
S
S
R
R
S
S
R
S
S
R
S
S
S
R
M
W
R
M
S
M
S
S
Habitat
Preference2
SmRv
SmRz
SmRz
SmRz
Sm
Sm
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRv
Rv
Sm Rv Rz
RvRz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRz
Sm
SmRv
Rz
Rz
SmRv
SmRz
SmRz
Rz
Sm Rz
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRvRz
Rv
Rz
Rz
SmRz
SmRz
Sm Rz
SmRz
Rz
Page 3 of 6
-------
Common Name
Yellow-ramped Warbler
Black-throated Gray Warbler
Townsend's Warbler
MacGillivray's Warbler
Common Yellowthroat
Wilson's Warbler
Yellow-breasted Chat
Western Tanager
Green-tailed Towhee
Spotted Towhee
American Tree sparrow
Chipping sparrow
Brewer's Sparrow
Vesper Sparrow
Lark Sparrow
Black-throated Sparrow
Sage Sparrow
Savannah Sparrow
Song Sparrow
Lincoln's Sparrow
White-throated Sparrow
Harris's Sparrow
White-crowned Sparrow
Dark-eyed Junco
Black-headed Grosbeak
Lazuli Bunting
Red-winged Blackbird
Western Meadowlark
Brewer's Blackbird
Brown-headed Cowbird
Bullock's Oriole
Cassin's Finch
House Finch
Pine Siskin
American Goldfinch
Evening Grosbeak
House Sparrow
Mammals
Insectivores (Shrews)
Masked shrew
Merriam Shrew
Vagrant Shrew
Chiroptera (Bats)
Little Brown Myotis
Cave Myotis
Fringed Myotis
Scientific Name
Dendroica coronata
Dendroica nigrescens
Dendroica townsendi
Oporonis tolmiei
Geothylpis trichas
Wilsonia pusilla
Icteria virens
Piranga ludoviciana
Pipilo chlorurus
Pipilo maculatus
Spizella arborea
Spizella passerina
spizella breweri
Pocecetes gramineus
Chondestes grammacus
Amphispiza brlineata
Amphispiza belli
Passerculus sandwichensis
Melospiza melodia
Melospiza linclonii
Zonotrichia Albicollis
Sonotrichia querula
Zonotrichia leucophrys
Junco hyemalis
Pheucticus melanocephalus
Passeriana amoena
Agelaius phoeniceus
Stumella neglecta
Euphagus cyanocephalus
Molothrus ater
Icterus bullockii
Carpodacus cassinii
Carpodacus mexicanus
Carduelis pinus
Carduelis trists
Coccothraustes vespertinus
Passer domesticus
Sorex cinereus
Sorex merriami
Sorex vagrans
Myotis lucifugus
Myotis velifer
Myotis thysanodes
Seasonal
Status1
R
S
M
S
S
M
S
M
S
R
W
S
S
S
S
S
R
S
R
S
W
W
R
W
S
S
R
R
R
S
S
M
R
M
R
W
R
R
R
R
M
M
M
Habitat
Preference2
SmRz
Sm
SmRz
Rz
Rz
Rz
Rz
SmRz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
Rv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
Rz
Rz
Sm Rz
Rz
SmRz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Rv
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm
Sm Rv Rz
SmRz
SmRz
Rz
Rv
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Page 4 of 6
-------
Common Name
Long-eared Myotis
Long-legged Myotis
California Myotis
Small-footed Myotis
Yuma Myotis
Silver-haired Bat
Western Pipistrel
Big Brown Bat
Hoary Bat
Western Big-eared Bat
Spotted Bat
Pallid Bat
Mexican Freetail Bat
Carnivores
Racoon
Shorttail Weasel
Longtail Weasel
Badger
Spotted Skunk
Stripped Skunk
Coyote
Red Fox
Kit Fox
Mountain Lion
Bobcat
Rodents
Yellow-belly Marmot
Rock Squirrel
Townsend Ground Squirrel
Golden-mantled Squirrel
Whitetail Antelope Squirrel
Least Chipmunk
Cliff chipmunk
Botta's Pocket Gopher
Northern Pocket Gopher
Great Basin Pocket Mouse
Longtail Pocket Mouse
Dark Kangaroo Mouse
Ord Kangaroo Rat
Great Basin Kangaroo Rat
Western Harvest Mouse
Canyon Mouse
Deer Mouse
Brush Mouse
Pinyon Mouse
Northern Grasshopper Mouse
Desert Woodrat
Bushytail Woodrat
Scientific Name
Myotis evotis
Myotis volans
Myotis califomicus
Myotis leibii
Myotis yumanensis
Lasionycteris noctivagans
Pipistrellus hesperus
Eptesicusfuscus
Lasiutus cinereus
Plecotus townsendii
Eudema maculatum
Antrozous pallidus
Tadarida brasiliensis
Procyon lotor
Mustela erminea
Mustela frenata
Taxidea taxus
Spilogale putorius
Mephitis mephitis
Canis latrans
Vulpes vulpes
Vulpes macrotis
Felix concolor
Lynx rufus
Marmotaflaviventris
spermophilus varegatus
Spermophilus townsendi
Spermophilus lateralis
Ammospennophilus leucurus
Eutamias minimus
Eutamias dorsalis
Thomomys bottae
Thomomys talpoides
Perognathus parvus
Perognathusformosus
Microdipodops megacephalus
Dipodomys ordii
Dipodomys microps
Reithrodontomys megllotis
Peromyscus crintus
Peromyscus maniculatus
Peromyscus boylii
Peromyscus truei
Onychomys leucogaster
Neotoma lepida
Neotoma cinerea
Seasonal
Status1
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
Habitat
Preference2
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
SmRvRz
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
Sm
Sm Rv Rz
Sm
Sm
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
Rz
Page 5 of 6
-------
Common Name
Longtail Vole
Richardson Vole
House Mouse
Western Jumping Mouse
Porcupine
Lagomorpha
Blacktail Jackrabbit
Desert Cottontail
Mountain Cottontail
Artiodactyla
Elk
Mule Deer
Scientific Name
microtus longicaudus
Microtus richardsoni
Mus musculus
Zapus princeps
Erethizonflaviventris
lepus califomicus
Sylvilagus auduboni
Sylvilagus nuttali
Cervis elephus
Odocoileus heminus
Seasonal
Status1
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
W
R
Habitat
Preference2
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Rz
Sm Rv Rz
SmRv
Sm Rv Rz
SmRz
Sm Rv Rz
Sm Rv Rz
Source: Remedial Investigation (AECI, 2003a)
1 Seasonal Status
R = Resident
S = Summer
W = Winter
M = Migrant
2 Habitat Preference
Sm = Submontane Shrub/Brushland
Rv = Reclaimed/Revegetated Areas
Rz = Riparian Zone
Page 6 of 6
-------
Table 2-3
Avian Endangered, Threatened, or Utah Species of Concern
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Name
American Peregrine Falcon
(Falco peregrinus)
Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Ferruginous Hawk
(Buteo regalis)
Swainson's Hawk
(Buteo swainsoni)
Short-eared Owl
(Asia flammeus)
Long Billed Curlew
(Numnenius americanus)
Common Yellowthroat
(Geothlypis trichas)
Status
Utah - Endangered
Federal - Removed from the
Endangered Species List (1999)
Utah-
Federal - Threatened
Utah - Threatened
Federal -
Utah - Species of Concern
Federal -
Utah - Noted Decline
Utah - Species of Concern
Federal -
Utah - Species of Concern
Federal -
Occurrence
Does not nest in project area. May hunt over project
area.
No known nests or roosting in project area, primarily
wintering species in Utah. Often concentrate in western
Utah desert valley and around large water bodies. May
hunt over project area.
No known nests on the project area. Nests in open
desert valleys. May hunt over project area
No known nests on the project area. Nests in open
desert valleys. May hunt over project area.
No known nesting on project area, but can be found in
bench land and open areas such as those of the project
area. May hunt over project area.
No known nests on project area. This species does
forage open grassland bench areas of the type on the
site during migration.
No known nests on project area. May have adequate
marsh habitat on the lower Pine Creek riparian corridor
for nesting.
Source: Remedial Investigation (AECI2003a)
-------
Table 3-1
Data Collected During the Ecological Risk Sampling
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
TERRESTRIAL DATA COLLECTION
Station ID
WAI
LOCATION 2
LOCATION 4
WA3
LOCATION 21
LOCATION 22
LOCATION 23
LOCATION 24
LOCATION 27
WAS
LOCATION 47
LOCATION 50
WA6
LOCATION 56
LOCATION 63
WA7
LOCATION 66
LOCATION 67
LOCATION 68
LOCATION 69
LOCATION 70
LOCATION 71
LOCATION 72
LOCATION 73
LOCATION 74
WAS/ WAI 1
LOCATION 106
LOCATION 108
LOCATION 138
LOCATION 96
WA9
LOCATION 113
LOCATION 117
LOCATION 120
LOCATION 126
LOCATION 133
WA10
LOCATION 153
Plant Tissue
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Invertebrate
rr. 1
1 issue
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Soil Nutrient2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
AQUATIC DATA COLLECTION
Station ID
Pine Creek (WA7)
SED01
SED02
SED03
SED04
Sediment3
X
X
dry
dry
Run-Off Ponds (WA3)
No samples collected, ponds were dry.
Sediment
Porewater
X
X
dry
dry
Sediment
Toxicity Tests
X
X
X
X
SED 01 and 02 are shown as PI and P2 in Figure 3-2.
SED 03 and 04 are not shown in Figure 3-2, but were collected from the two
triangular-shaped "ponds" located immediately southwest of station 70. These
stations were dry at the time of sampling.
PLANT COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHICS
Location
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
ZONES
ZONE 4
ZONES
# of Species
X
X
X
X
X
% Coverage
X
X
X
X
X
Biomass
X
X
X
X
X
See Figure 2-2 for the location of these zones.
See Figure 3-2 for the location of these sampling stations.
Tissue samples were analyzed for aluminum, antimony, arsenic, cadmuim, lead, mercury, and selenium.
Soil samples were analyzed for copper, iron, manganese, potassium, and zinc using a DPTA extraction method.
3 Sediment samples were analyed for bulk metals, simultaneously extractable metals (SEM) and acid volatile sulfide (AVS).
Bulk metals analysis included arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc. SEM analysis included arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc.
4 Sediment porewater samples (dissolved fraction) were analyed for aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, silver, and zinc.
Sediment toxicity tests using amphipod (Hyalella azteca) and chronomid (Chironomus tentans) species.
Table 3-1 New 2003 Eco Data.xls, 5/18/2004
-------
Table 4-1
Risk Characterization Results, Data Gaps, and Potential Future Studies Identified in the Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment
Exposure
Pathway
Approach
AQUATIC RECEPTORS (BMI
Direct Contact
with Surface
Water
Direct Contact
with Sediment
Hazard
Quotient
Hazard
Quotient
COPCs
SLERA Risk Characterization Results
Further
Evaluation?
Data Gap
Potential Future Studies
Aquatic Plants)
Pine Creek: Be, Cd, Nitrite,
IDS
Ponds: Alk., Al, Cd, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Mn, Se, Ag, Zn
Pine Creek: Sb, As, Cd, Cu,
Pb, Hg, Ag, Zn
Ponds: Al, Sb, As, Cd, Cu,
Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, Ag, Zn
Be & Nitrite HQs of 2 (chronic), but no spatial or
temporal pattern.
Al, Cd, Cu, Pb, Ag, Zn HQs above 1 (acute), chronic
HQs range from <1 to 600 (Cd).
All COPC HQs above 1 (TEC), HQs range from <1 to
30 (Pb), highest HQs in marshy areas downstream.
Most COPC HQs above 1 (TEC), HQs range from <1
to 100 (Pb).
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
Habitat quality, temporal nature, &
receptor use is unknown.
Site-specific bioavailability of metals
in sediments is unknown.
Habitat quality, temporal nature, &
receptor use is unknown.
-
Collect data on habitat quality, nature, &
receptor use.1
Measure sediment SEM/AVS, collect
sediment porewater, perform sediment
toxicity testing using BMI species.
Collect data on habitat quality, nature, &
receptor use.
TERRESTRIAL RECEPTORS (Plants, Soil Invertebrates)
Direct Contact
with Soil
Hazard
Quotient
Predictive
Models
Community
Observations
Al, Sb, As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu,
Fe, Pb, Mn, Hg, Ni, Se, Ag,
Tl, V, Zn
Suave Model: Cu, Pb
PTI Model: T of As, Cd, Cu,
Pb,Zn
Kapustka Model: T of As,
Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn
n/a
Most COPC HQs above 1, widespread and severe
toxicity predicted for both Non-AOCs & AOCs.
Plant productivity, species competition, microbial
processes may be adversely impacted in Non-AOCs,
severely in AOCs.
Decreased in plant biomass & species richness
predicted, primarily at AOCs & in some Non-AOCs.
Plant germination & growth may be adversely impacted
for both Non-AOCs & AOCs.
Revegetation efforts have improved coverage and
desirable species, but areas of visually stressed/absent
vegetation occur on site.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Site-specific bioavailability of metals
in soils is unknown.
Site-specific bioavailability of metals
in soils is unknown.
Applicability of predictive models to
site-specific conditions & receptors is
unknown.
Correlation between plant community
metrics & soil concentrations is
unknown.
Perform soil toxicity testing using plant
and soil invertebrate species.
WILDLIFE RECEPTORS (Birds, Mammals)
Ingestion of
Surface Water
Ingestion of
Sediment, Soil, &
Food Items
Hazard
Quotient
Hazard
Quotient
Water: Al
Sediment/Soil/Diet: Al, Sb,
As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn,
Hg, Ni, Se, Tl, V, Z
Surface water HQs for all receptors < 1 for Pine Creek
& ponds.
Large HR receptors (fox, hawk, deer):
All COPC HQs < 1 for All WAs.
Med. HR aquatic receptor (mallard):
primary risk drivers = Pb in sediment; Hg, Al, Zn, Se
in food items (BMI)
Med. HR terrestrial receptors (swallow, bat, dove):
primary risk drivers = Pb, As in soil; As, Sb, Cd, Hg,
Pb, Se in food items (plants, invert.)
Small HR receptors (mouse, shrew, robin):
primary risk drivers in Non-AOCs = Pb, As, Cd, Sb in
soil; As, Sb, Cd, Hg, Pb, Se in food items (plants,
invert.)
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
-
Tissues concentrations estimated using
BAF, site-specific uptake is unknown.
Site-specific RBA from sediment/soil
is unknown.
Applicability of selected TRVs to site
conditions and representative
receptors is unknown.
-
Measure BMI, plant, invertebrate tissue
concentrations.
Develop site-specific RBAs for
soil/sediment.
Develop species & exposure route-
specific TRVs.
HR = Home Range
RBA = Relative Bioavailability
TRV = Toxicity Reference Value
WA = Work Area
AOC = Area of Concern
COPC = Chemicals of Potential Concern
BAF = Bioaccumulation Factor
BMI = Benthic macroinvertebrates
Notes:
Depending upon ecological management goals for the ponds, additional surface water, sediment/soil, sediment porewater, and/or toxicity tests may be needed.
Primary risk drivers presented are the top 5 COPCs relative to Utah background, other COPCs may also be above a level of concern and contribute to overall risks.
3 Includes flying insects, terrestrial and soil-dwelling invertebrates.
Table 4-1 SLERASummary.xls, 5/18/2004
-------
Table 4-2
Summary of Assessment and Measurement Endpoints
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Receptor
Aquatic
Terrestrial
Wildlife
Assessment Endpoint
Protection of aquatic invertebrates from
adverse effects related to exposure to
chemicals in surface water.
Protection of aquatic invertebrates from
adverse effects related to exposure to
chemicals in sediment.
Protection of terrestrial plants and soil
organisms from adverse effects related to
exposure to chemicals in surface soil.
Protection of wildlife from adverse effects
to growth, reproduction, or survival related
to exposure to chemicals in surface water,
sediment, soil, and dietary items.
Measurement Endpoint
HO Approach: Comparison of measured contaminant concentrations in surface water to
screening level toxicity benchmarks for the aquatic community.
HO Approach: Comparison of measured contaminant concentrations in bulk sediment to
screening level toxicity benchmarks for benthic invertebrates.
HO Approach: Comparison of measured simultaneously extractable metals (SEM) to acid
volatile sulfide (AVS) concentrations in sediment.
HO Approach: Comparison of measured contaminant concentrations in sediment porewate
to screening level toxicity benchmarks for the aquatic community.
Site Toxicitv Testing: Comparison of measured survival and growth endpoints in site
sediment toxicity tests (Hyalella azteca and Chironomus tentans ) to reference/control
sediments.
r
Community Demographics: n/a
HO Approach: Comparison of contaminant concentrations in soil to screening level toxicitv
benchmarks for terrestrial plants and soil organisms.
Site Toxicitv Testing: n/a
Community Demographics: Comparison of plant community metrics for site locations to
applicable reference locations.
Comparison of the contaminant doses estimated from contaminant concentrations in surface
water, sediment, soil, and dietary items to toxicity reference values (TRVs) for wildlife.
Site Toxicitv Testing: n/a
Community Demographics: n/a
n/a = data are not available to assess risks using this type of measurement endpoint
Table 4-2 A&M Endpoints.xls
5/18/2004
-------
Table 5-1
HQs for Aquatic Receptors from Direct Contact with Surface Water in Pine Creek and the Run-Off Ponds (a)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
PINE CREEK
Station
SW17; farthest
station upstream
SW18; above WA2
slag pile
SW15; above WA2
slag pile
SW5; at culvert
above WA2 slag
pile
SW12; below WA2
slag pile
ACSW5; below
WA2 slag pile
SW14; below WA2
slag pile
upstream
t
downstream
Sampling Date
Dec-01
Apr-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Dec-01
Apr-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Dec-01
Apr-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Dec-01
Apr-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Dec-01
Apr-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Dec-01
Apr-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Dec-01
Apr-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Acute
Beryllium
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Cadmium
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Nitrite
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
IDS
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Chronic
Beryllium
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Cadmium
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Nitrite
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2
IDS
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
RUN-OFF PONDS
Station
Pond #1
Pond #2
Pond #3
Pond #4
Pond #5
Sampling Date
Mar-02
Mar-02
Mar-02
Mar-02
Mar-02
Acute
Alkalinity
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Aluminum
2
<1
<1
<1
<1
Cadmium
8
100
<1
4
2
Copper
3
10
4
6
8
Iron
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Lead
2
3
<1
<1
3
Manganese
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Selenium
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Silver
<1
3
2
3
2
Zinc
<1
20
<1
<1
<1
Station
Pond #1
Pond #2
Pond #3
Pond #4
Pond #5
Sampling Date
Mar-02
Mar-02
Mar-02
Mar-02
Mar-02
Chronic
Alkalinity
<1
5
<1
<1
<1
Aluminum
20
2
2
3
6
Cadmium
60
600
8
20
9
Copper
5
10
5
8
10
Iron
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Lead
60
80
10
10
70
Manganese
<1
4
<1
<1
<1
Selenium
2
<1
<1
<1
<1
Silver
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Zinc
<1
20
<1
<1
<1
NC = Not Calculated, toxicity benchmark not available.
All HQs are shown to one significant figure.
See Figure 5-1 for a surface water sampling location schematic map.
(a) Data shown are from the SLERA (USEPA 2003a).
SLERA SW Aq HQ Summ.xls: SLERA SW HQ Table
5/18/2004
-------
Table 5-2
HQs for Benthic Invertebrates from Direct Contact with Surface Water in Pine Creek and the Run-Off Ponds (a)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
PINE CREEK
Station
Station 86
Station 85
Station 84
Station 83
Station 82
Station 81
Station 80
Station 79
Station 78
Station 77
Station 76
Station 75
upstream
(marshy
areas)
;
downstream
Based on Threshold Effect Concentration (TEC) Benchmarks
Antimony
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2
<1
2
<1
Arsenic
< 1
2
2
<1
2
2
2
3
4
2
8
3
Cadmium
<1
<1
2
<1
<1
3
3
6
6
2
20
3
Copper
5
<1
3
2
<1
4
2
5
7
4
20
5
Lead
<1
2
4
2
4
4
4
7
20
4
30
4
Mercury
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
4
<1
4
<1
Silver
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2
<1
2
<1
Zinc
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2
2
3
3
2
7
2
Station
Station 86
Station 85
Station 84
Station 83
Station 82
Station 81
Station 80
Station 79
Station 78
Station 77
Station 76
Station 75
upstream
(marshy
areas)
*
downstream
Based on Probable Effect Concentration (PEC) Benchmarks
Antimony
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Arsenic
< 1
<1
<1
< 1
< 1
<1
<1
< 1
< 1
<1
2
< 1
Cadmium
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
3
<1
Copper
< 1
<1
<1
< 1
< 1
<1
<1
< 1
2
<1
3
< 1
Lead
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2
6
<1
8
<1
Mercury
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
< 1
<1
<1
<1
Silver
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Zinc
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
< 1
<1
2
<1
RUN-OFF PONDS
Station
Pond#l
Pond #2
Pond #3
Pond #4
Pond #5
Based on Threshold Effect Concentration (TEC) Benchmarks
Aluminum
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Antimony
< 1
5
< 1
8
3
Arsenic
3
30
8
50
30
Cadmium
4
40
10
20
10
Copper
2
20
3
20
10
Lead
6
80
10
100
40
Manganese
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Mercury
<1
30
8
20
5
Nickel
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Silver
<1
9
<1
20
5
Zinc
2
9
< 1
10
3
Station
Pond#l
Pond #2
Pond #3
Pond #4
Pond #5
Based on Probable Effect Concentration (PEC) Benchmarks
Aluminum
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Antimony
< 1
< 1
<1
<1
< 1
Arsenic
<1
8
2
10
9
Cadmium
< 1
7
2
5
3
Copper
<1
4
<1
4
3
Lead
2
20
3
40
10
Manganese
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Mercury
< 1
4
<1
3
< 1
Nickel
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Silver
<1
2
<1
4
<1
Zinc
< 1
2
<1
3
< 1
NC = Not Calculated, toxicity benchmark not available.
All HQs are shown to one significant figure.
See Figure 5-1 for a sediment sampling location schematic map.
(a) Data shown are from the SLERA (USEPA 2003a).
SLERA Sed Aq HQ Summ.xls: Sed HQ Table
5/18/2004
-------
Table 5-3
Results of the SEM/AVS Analysis in Pine Creek Sediments
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Station ID
Pine Creek:
01 SED
Pine Creek:
02 SED
Analyte
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
Total
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
Total
Bulk
(mg/kg)
<0.93
89.5
94.9
0.038
278
SEM
(mg/kg) (umol/g)
0.799 0.007
18.8 0.296
64.1 0.309
0.0037 0.00002
1.54 0.026
96.8 1.48
2.12
2.27
119
184
0.109
446
1.89 0.017
43.4 0.683
105 0.507
0.0053 0.00003
4.22 0.072
146 2.23
3.51
AVS
(umol/g)
0.97
1.68
SEM-AVS
(umol/g)
1.15
1.83
SEM = Simultaneously Extractable Metals
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfide
Source: AECI (2004c)
IS&R SEM_AVS.xls, 6/3/2004
-------
Table 5-4
Comparison of Sediment Porewater Concentrations to Aqueous Toxicity Benchmarks
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium Copper Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Aqeuous Toxicity Benchmarks2 (ug/L)
Acute
Chronic
750
87
180
30
340
150
3.95
0.40
25.82 136.1
16.19 5.31
2300
120
1.2
0.65
841.7
93.48
11.37
1.14
210.8
212.5
Average Sediment Porewater Concentration in Field (ug/L)
01SED
02SED
162
147
n/a
n/a
4.8
5.1
0.09
0.09
5.8 3.0
3.8 1.7
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.5
0.5
15.6
10.0
Sediment Porewater HQs
01SED
Acute
Chronic
02SED
Acute
Chronic
<1
2
<1
2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
National Ambient Water Quality Criteria values not available, benchmarks based on the Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative Tier II values.
2 Hardness-dependent benchmarks based on a hardness of 200 mg/L. Assumes that porewater hardness is similar to hardness in Pine Creek overlying water.
3 Non-detects evaluated at one-half the detection limit. N = 2 samples for 01 SED; N = 5 samples for 02 SED.
Note: Pine Creek stations 03 and 04 and the run-off ponds were dry at the time of sampling, no samples were collected.
All HQs are shown to one significant figure.
n/a = not analyzed
SedPW_AWQC.xls, 5/19/2004
-------
Table 5-5
Sediment Toxicity Test Results for Pine Creek
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Hyalella azteca Sediment Toxicity Test Results
Sample ID
Sand Control
Lab Control
01 SED
02SED
03 SED
04 SED
% Survival
95 (7.6)
81 (13.6)
90 (12.0)
95 (9.3)
93 (7.1)
89 (9.9)
Weight
mg/org
0.103 (0.027)
0.065 (0.015)
0.099 (0.019)
0.115 (0.016)
0.069 (0.015) *
0.079 (0.014) *
Weight
mg/org surv.
0.108 (0.025)
0.08 (0.008)
0.11 (0.014)
0.122 (0.020)
0.074 (0.011) *
0.089 (0.012) *
Standard deviation shown in parentheses ().
* = significantly less than the sand control (a = 0.05)
Note: The sand control was used for statistical comparisons because survival
and growth in the lab control was significantly lower than the sand control
(a = 0.05).
Source: AECI (2003b)
Chironomus tentans Sediment Toxicity Test Results
Sample ID
Sand Control
Lab Control
01 SED
02 SED
03 SED
04 SED
% Survival
71 (29.5)
64
53 (24.4)
79 (14.6)
93 (10.4)
68 (23.8)
Weight
mg/org
0.964
1.031
1.538
1.418
1.472
1.072
Weight
mg/org surv.
1.400
1.721
2.969
1.824
1.596
1.563
Standard deviation shown in parentheses ().
~ = standard deviations not provided in laboratory report
Note: The sand control was used for statistical comparisons because survival
in the lab control (< 70%) was below acceptable levels.
Source: AECI (2004c)
IS&R Sed Tox Results.xls, 6/3/2004
-------
Table 5-6
Summary of Lines of Evidence for Aquatic Receptors in Pine Creek (WA7)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Line of Evidence
Findings
Interpretation
Exposure Pathway: Direct Contact with Surface Water
Estimated HQs from
measured surface water
concentrations
Cadmium and TDS HQs were below a level of concern in
all samples. Slight exceedances of the chronic benchmark
for beryllium and nitrite in two samples did not appear to be
spatially or temporally correlated.
Risk estimates indicate that surface water is not likely to have
either acute or chronic impacts on aquatic receptors.
Exposure Pathway: Direct Contact with Sediment
Estimated HQs from
measured bulk sediment
concentrations
Comparison of measured
SEM to AVS in bulk
sediment
Estimated HQs from
measured sediment
porewater concentrations
Sediment Toxicity Tests
Concentrations of antimony, arsenic, cadmium , copper,
lead, mercury, silver, and zinc were above the TEC in one
or more samples. Concentrations increased with distance
downstream and were highest in the marshy areas.
Concentrations of SEM slightly exceeded AVS in both
samples downstream of WA2 slag pile, but other binding
agents may attenuate exposures from any metals that may
leach into sediment porewater.
Concentrations of all metals measured in sediment
porewater were below a level of concern.
No significant decreases in survival were seen for any of the
Pine Creek sediment samples in either the H. azteca or the
C. tentans test. Significant decreases in growth were seen in
H. azteca when exposed to sediments from the marshy
areas.
Risk estimates indicate that several metals in sediment are
likely to be adversely impacting benthic invertebrates,
especially in the marshy areas.
SEM/AVS comparisons indicate that sediment is not likely to
have adverse impacts on benthic invertebrates.
Risk estimates indicate that sediment porewater is not likely to
have either acute or chronic impacts on benthic invertebrates.
Toxicity tests suggest that direct contact with sediments is not
likely to adversely impact benthic invertebrate survival.
However, chronic exposure to sediments may impact growth in
more sensitive invertebrate species.
All Exposure Pathways Combined
Aquatic community
evaluation
One sample collected from the marshy area found
representatives of several invertebrate taxa. Specific
population community metrics were not measured.
Several benthic invertebrate species reside in the marshy areas,
however, it is not possible to determine if population is similar
to that expected in an unimpacted community.
-------
Table 5-7
Summary of Lines of Evidence for Aquatic Receptors in the Run-off Ponds (WA3/WA4)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Line of Evidence
Findings
Interpretation
Exposure Pathway: Direct Contact with Surface Water
Estimated HQs from
measured surface water
concentrations
Concentrations of aluminum, cadmium, copper, lead, silver,
and zinc in the run-off ponds were above aquatic receptor
benchmarks for acute effects.
Risk estimates indicate that surface water is likely to have both
acute and chronic impacts on aquatic receptors.
Exposure Pathway: Direct Contact with Sediment
Estimated HQs from
measured bulk sediment
concentrations
Estimated HQs from
measured sediment
porewater concentrations
Comparison of measured
SEM to AVS in bulk
sediment
Sediment Toxicity Tests
Concentrations of antimony, arsenic, cadmium , copper,
lead, mercury, silver, and zinc were above the TEC in one
or more samples.
Not measured; ponds were dry at the time of the field
investigation.
Not measured; ponds were dry at the time of the field
investigation.
Toxicity tests not performed.
Risk estimates indicate that several metals in sediment are
likely to be adversely impacting benthic invertebrates.
—
~
~
All Exposure Pathways Combined
Aquatic community
evaluation
Not evaluated; ponds were dry at the time of the field
investigation.
~
-------
Table 6-1
Summary of Predictive Model Results for
Terrestrial Receptors from Direct Contact with Soils
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Predictive Model
Non-AOC Soils
AOC Soils1
Suave et al. (2000)
Copper
Lead
High Inhibition - 17%
Mod. Inhibition - 39%
Low Inhibition - 45%
High inhibition - 26%
Mod. Inhibition - 58%
Low Inhibition - 16%
High Inhibition - 78%
Mod. Inhibition - 18%
Low Inhibition - 5%
High inhibition -81%
Mod. Inhibition - 16%
Low Inhibition - 2%
PTI (1994)
Total Metals
(As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn)
Dec. Biomass, Species Richness - 9%
Dec. Species Richness - 13%
No Dec. Expected - 78%
Dec. Biomass, Species Richness - 61%
Dec. Species Richness - 15%
No Dec. Expected - 24%
Kapustka et al. (1995)
Total Metals
(As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn)
Phytotoxic Effect - 44%
No Phytotoxic Effect - 56%
Phytotoxic Effect - 89%
No Phytotoxic Effect - 1 1%
Approximately 2% of the entire IS&R Site is classified as an AOC.
Suave Equations:
pCu = 1.4 * pH - 1.7 * log(Total Cu) + 3.42
% Inhibition = -13.2 * pCu+ 151.2
pPb = 0.62 * pH - 0.84 * log(Total Pb) + 6.78
% Inhibition = -19.5 * pPb + 210.1
PTI Equations:
Biomass = (-0.0186 * total metals) + (78.2 * pH) - 208
# Species = (-0.0012 * total metals) + (5.61 * pH) - 18.0
Site values compared to reference biomass (135 g/m dw) and species richness (13.2).
Kapustka Equations:
Score = 520 * pH - 230 - total metals
Phytotoxicity not expected if score > 0.
SLERA Model Results.xls, 5/18/2004
-------
Table 6-2
Summary of Plant Community Metrics
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
BLM Reference
Station A
Station D
Station E
Zone 1
WAI: Station 1
WAI: Station 2
WAI: Station 7
WAS: Station 50
WAS: Station 51
WAS: Station 52
Zone 2
WAS: Station 23
WAS: Station 24
WAS: Station 27
WA6: Station 56
Zone 3
WA8: Station 106
WA8: Station 108
WAS: Station 138
Zone 4
WA7: Station 67
WA7: Station 68
WA7: Station 70
WA7: Station 71
WA7: Station 72
Zone 5
WA9: Station 114
WA9: Station 116
WA9: Station 117
WA9: Station 120
WA9: Station 127
December-02
Average # of
Plant Species
4.8
4.6
4.0
5.8
3.7
4.6
5.4
0.6
3.2
4.2
4.4
3.2
2.6
3.4
3.8
3.0
3.7
2.8
3.4
4.8
3.4
4.2
3.6
3.4
3.4
2.2
3.6
3.0
4.0
1.0
5.0
5.2
Average Canopy
Cover (%)
29.0%
35.3%
31.1%
20.7%
18.1%
30.4%
18.9%
2.6%
25.4%
15.2%
16.3%
12.2%
12.4%
15.5%
12.3%
8.6%
13.9%
11.2%
15.8%
14.7%
11.2%
14.9%
14.1%
7.0%
12.6%
7.4%
17.6%
8.1%
22.9%
9.8%
13.3%
33.8%
Zone
BLM Reference
Station A
Station D
Station E
Zone 1
WAI: Station 1
WAI: Station 2
WAI: Station 7
WAS: Station 50
WAS: Station 51
WAS: Station 52
Zone 2
WA3: Station 23
WA3: Station 24
WA3: Station 27
WA6: Station 56
Zone 3
WAS: Station 106
WAS: Station 108
WAS: Station 138
Zone 4
WA7: Station 67
WA7: Station 68
WA7: Station 70
WA7: Station 71
WA7: Station 72
Zone 5
WA9: Station 114
WA9: Station 116
WA9: Station 117
WA9: Station 120
WA9: Station 127
July-03
Average # of
Plant Species
3.1
3.4
2.8
3.0
3.3
Average Canopy
Cover (%)
23.4%
16.7%
40.1%
13.4%
29.7%
Average Living
Biomass (Ib/acre)
879
723
1,129
787
1,309
not evaluated in July 2003
4.6
15.1%
1,210
not evaluated in July 2003
2.0
44.3%
1,407
not evaluated in July 2003
not evaluated in July 2003
3.0
4.4
4.0
2.0
1.6
2.7
2.2
3.2
2.8
2.8
15.4%
13.8%
12.6%
26.6%
8.5%
5.4%
3.0%
4.5%
8.6%
26.2%
990
475
610
1,654
1,222
399
400
355
441
2,576
not evaluated in July 2003
not evaluated in July 2003
2.8
26.2%
2,576
not evaluated in July 2003
not evaluated in July 2003
2.1
31.7%
1,374
not evaluated in July 2003
not evaluated in July 2003
1.2
3.0
60.0%
3.3%
2,501
242
not evaluated in July 2003
Zones 2 and 3 represent remediated locations; Zones 1, 4, and 5 represent unremediated locations.
Detailed sampling information is provided in Appendix D.
Source: AECI (2003a,b; 2004o,d)
Plant Community Data.xls
11/18/2004
-------
Table 6-3
Comparison of Plant Community Zones to Native Range Conditions and Reference
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
PANEL A: Comparison to Native Range Conditions
Zone (WA)
BLM Reference
Zone 1 (WAI)
Zone 1 (WAS)
Zone 2 (WA3, WA6)
Zone 3 (WAS)
Zone 4 (WA7)
Zone 5 (WA9)
Based on Cover Composition Estimates
December-02
% of Native
Community
--
21%
26%
59%
38%
45%
39%
Range
Condition
-
Poor
Fan-
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair
July-03
% of Native
Community
20%
20%
15%
59%
51%
27%
35%
Range
Condition
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Based on Biomass Composition
Estimates
July-03
% of Native
Community
20%
20%
23%
58%
53%
36%
33%
Range Condition
Poor
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Fan-
Fair
— = Not Evaluated
Source: AECI (2003b; 2004e)
PANEL B: Comparison to Reference
Zone
BLM Reference
Zone 1 (WAI)
Zone 1 (WAS)
Zone 2 (WAS, WA6)
Zone 3 (WAS)
Zone 5 (WA9)
Average # of Plant Species
December-02
4.8
3.5
3.9 +
3.2 +
3.7 +
3.6 +
July-03
3.1
4.6
2.0 +
3.0
2.7
2.1 +
Average Canopy Cover (%)
December-02
29.0%
17.3% +
19.0% +
12.2% +
13.9% +
17.6% +
July-03
23.4%
15.1%
44.3%
15.4% +
5.4% +
31.7%
Average Living
Biomass
(lb/acre)a
July-03
879
1,210
1,407
990
399
1,374
+ Statistically lower than BLM Reference (p < 0.05)
a Due to low sample sizes of measured biomass, statistical significance could not be evaluated.
Zones 2 and 3 represent remediated locations; Zones 1, 4, and 5 represent unremediated locations.
Plant Community Data.xls
6/10/2004
-------
Table 6-4
Comparison of Bulk Metals Concentrations to Plant Community Metrics
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
ZONE1
ZONE 2
ZONES
ZONE 4
ZONES
Work
Area
WAI
WAS
WAS
WA6
WAS
WA7
WA9
Station
2
SO
23
24
27
56
106
108
138
70
117
120
Depth
(in)
0-2
0-2
0-2
2-6
12-18
0-2
2-6
12-18
0-2
2-6
12-18
0-2
2-6
0-2
2-6
0-2
2-6
0-2
2-6
0-2
2-6
0-2
0-2
PH
6.34
6.22
6.13
7.02
7.61
6.72
7.04
6.96
7.17
6.84
5.86
5.27
5.68
6.9
7.39
6.82
6.78
7.82
7.87
7.45
7.37
6.15
6.26
Bulk Soil Concentration (mg/kg)
Al
12,700
15,400
9,100
12,000
11,000
9,490
10,900
8,180
12,800
11,700
16,100
18,000
23,000
8,950
9,590
18,300
19,000
3,250
4,930
15,800
15,200
5,870
5,800
Sb
4.7
4
19
11
15
3.2
3.8
30
0.77
1.7
1.4
10
1.6
0.8
1.3
<0.36
<0.28
O.26
0.3
3.5
5.2
6.94
1.5
As
71
210
190
150
180
68
84
320
31
61
68
200
58
32
37
21
20
15
13
190
140
303
25
Ba
162
238
110
130
99
88.7
104
179
97.1
89.8
128
180
170
258
251
144
156
33.2
55.8
181
196
378
49
Be
0.628
0.772
0.45
0.62
0.5
0.519
0.57
0.395
0.55
0.545
0.634
0.93
1.1
0.416
0.47
0.806
0.916
0.214
0.308
0.9
0.881
0.224
0.28
Cd
19
18
22
34
29
5.7
5.8
18
6.4
10
13
34
22
2 2
2.3
1.5
0.92
1.1
0.9
22
24
1.85
1.1
Ca
3,950
3,220
1,700
2,200
8,700
2,020
2,130
5,590
3,340
2,020
1,820
1,900
2,400
2,330
3,870
3,510
3,130
8,840
9,650
15,700
10,400
2,140
1,000
Cr
15.9
17.7
10
12
11
11.4
11.7
11
14.5
13.6
18.8
19
22
12.2
13.2
18.8
19.5
5.85
7.17
23.5
19.2
8.62
7.2
Co
9.9
19.6
7.8
9.2
8
9.14
9.75
7.9
9.64
9.29
10.9
14
15
5.61
6.1
13.1
13.4
2.59
3.93
18.5
13.6
4.73
4
Cu
222
302
440
350
490
120
161
933
57.5
89.5
192
460
150
36.2
36
36.5
26.5
13.6
14.1
2290
1400
129
40
Fe
14,900
17,100
13,000
16,000
14,000
11,100
12,400
38,300
11,700
11,800
13,600
19,000
20,000
10,500
11,700
17,500
18,700
4,760
6,380
25,700
21,500
20,400
6,400
Pb
930
930
2,800
1,700
3,100
660
640
9,600
160
280
270
2,100
440
290
320
77
60
94
59
1,400
1,300
1,280
170
Mg
3,280
3,420
2,100
2,600
4,700
2,280
2,500
3,020
2,540
2,350
3,030
4,000
4,800
2,320
2,790
4,190
4,380
2,800
2,660
8,290
5,810
1,650
1,400
Mn
642
1400
460
480
440
346
402
315
405
410
503
730
720
465
515
563
603
211
257
1260
824
243
120
Hg
0.806
0.91
2.1
0.86
1.8
0.24
0.52
1.4
0.194
0.4
0.628
2.35
0.865
0.043
0.067
0.065
0.089
<0.0241
0.04
1.2
1.5
0.41
0.087
Ni
14.1
13.5
15
16
15
15.5
13.2
15.5
12.8
11.3
12.6
17
19
8.01
11.4
14.7
15.2
5.29
7.2
23.6
21.5
4.53
5.7
K
3,500
4,010
1,900
2,400
2,000
2,200
2,290
1,700
2,540
2,290
3,590
4,400
5,400
2,160
2,330
3,860
3,740
772
1,100
4,230
3,900
1,670
1,400
Se
0.73
1.1
3.6
2.5
3.9
0.64
1.0
6.7
<0.35
<0.33
0.41
3.2
1.1
<0.38
O.35
<0.48
<0.37
O.35
<0.35
2.9
1.7
1.99
<0.36
Ag
2.08
2.83
8
5.5
9.9
1.42
1.89
28.5
1.55
1.05
1.05
5.3
1.0
2.13
2.35
O.682
0.537
1.07
0.501
5.23
4.12
6.18
0.6
Na
104
184
80
79
96
57
58.4
122
80.6
60.2
130
110
120
66.1
56.7
86.7
85.3
33.1
31.8
128
123
123
58
Th
1.1
1.2
0.74
0.83
1.1
<0.62
<0.62
2.8
1.5
1.7
1.3
1.5
<0.66
<0.72
<0.65
0.91
<0.69
0.74
<0.67
2.6
1.4
2.11
<0.67
V
25.8
34.4
20
23
20
19
19.7
17
24.3
22.5
28.9
33
37
15.9
16.9
34.2
32.3
7.54
10.6
26.1
22.8
12.9
11
Zn
529
435
700
540
820
192
199
1,010
133
162
261
570
350
209
217
72
64
74
60
1,280
1,440
260
72
% cover
Dec-02
19%
25%
12%
16%
12%
11%
16%
15%
7%
10%
13%
Jul-03
15%
44%
14%
13%
27%
3%
5%
9%
26%
60%
3%
biomass
(Ib/acre)
M-03
1,210
1,407
475
610
1,654
400
355
441
2,576
2,501
242
# of species
Dec-02
7
4
5
7
6
4
4
7
8
2
8
M-03
7
4
11
9
6
4
8
4
7
2
5
Analysis resu]
Source: AECI (2004c)
i total recoverable metals (EPA Method 601 OB, 6010B trace, 7471A).
Soil Nutrient vs Bulk Conc.xls, Bulk vs Metrics
-------
Table 6-5
Summary of Plant Community Metric Correlations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting and Refining Site
PANEL A: Correlation with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Collection
Date
Dec-02
Jul-03
Plant
Metric
# of Species
% Coverage
# of Species
% Coverage
Biomass
# of chemicals
p value > 0.05
20
24
23
24
24
p value < 0.05
4 (As, Ba, Fe, Tl)
0
1 (Ba)
0
0
Bulk soils were analyzed for 23 metals and pH.
PANEL B: Correlation with Soil Nutrient Levels
Collection
Date
Dec-02
Jul-03
Plant
Metric
# of Species
% Coverage
# of Species
% Coverage
Biomass
# of parameters
p value > 0.05
10
9
10
9
9
p value < 0.05
0
1 (Mn)
0
1 (Fe)
l(Cu)
Soil nutrient levels were analyzed for 10 parameters.
See Appendix E for graphical presentations for each chemical.
Soil Nutrient vs Bulk Conc.xls, (correlation summ)
11/18/2004
-------
Table 6-6
Comparison of Measured Soil Nutrient Levels to Optimal Ranges for Plant Growth and Plant Community Metrics
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
ZONE1
ZONE 2
ZONES
ZONE 4
ZONES
Work
Area
WAI
WAS
WAS
WA6
WAS
WA7
WA9
Station
2
50
23
24
27
56
106
108
138
70
117
120
Soil Texture
Loam
Clay Loam
Loam
Loam
Loam
Clay Loam
Sandy Loam
Clay Loam
Sandy Loam
Loam
Sandy Loam
Sandy Loam
pH
6.8
6.1
6.6
6.7
6.4
6.6
7.7
6.9
7.8
6.9
5.2
6.0
Organic
Matter
(% of total)
4.0%
3.8%
2.2%
3.1%
2.2%
2.6%
1.8%
2.4%
2.3%
4.5%
2.2%
2.1%
Salinity -
Ece
(dS/m)
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.7
1.0
1.0
0.7
3.0
0.5
0.8
0.2
0.2
Copper
(mg/kg)
16.6
26.7
26.9
41.1
28.4
44.5
5
5.7
19.9
231
21.4
6.8
Iron
(mg/kg)
23.6
37.8
18.8
19.8
20.8
30.3
10.8
21.3
22.3
4.8
113
22.3
Manganese
(mg/kg)
20.9
22.7
10.8
10.1
10
14.8
7.4
12.3
7.3
4.2
17.6
12
Nitrate-
Nitrogen*
(mg/kg)
3.9
3.3
3.3
3.9
3
3.5
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.8
3.6
2.9
Potassium
(mg/kg)
276
350
175
184
144
274
105
268
109
287
138
136
Phos-
phorous
(mg/kg)
29
24
21
27
30
30
14.5
28
10.6
30
19.2
18.1
Sulfate-
Sulfur
(mg/kg)
6.1
6.1
5.7
7.4
55
5.5
24
129
21.2
20.6
20.8
4.4
Zinc
(mg/kg)
47.7
65.6
26.2
49.7
24.9
67.5
40.8
3.9
223
198
39.7
4.1
% cover
Dec-02
18.9%
25.4%
12.4%
15.5%
12.3%
12.2%
11.2%
15.8%
14.7%
7.0%
9.8%
13.3%
Jul-03
15.0%
44.0%
14.0%
13.0%
27.0%
9.0%
3.0%
5.0%
9.0%
26.0%
60.0%
3.0%
biomass
(Ib/acre)
Jul-03
1,210
1,407
475
610
1,654
1,222
400
355
441
2,576
2,501
242
# of species
Dec-02
7
4
5
7
6
5
4
4
7
8
2
8
Jul-03
7
4
11
9
6
5
4
8
4
7
2
5
Each sample represents a 5-point soil composite (0-12 inches) collected in December 2002.
* Differing nitrogen values may be observed at different times of the year due to the natural nitrogen cycle in the soil.
Analysis results based on DTPA extraction method, which represent extractable metals that are generally bioavailable to plants.
Source: AECI (2004c)
Soil Nutrient vs Bulk Conc.xls, 6/3/2004
-------
Table 6-7
Summary of Lines of Evidence for Terrestrial Plants in Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Line of Evidence
Findings
Predictive Approach
Estimated HQs from measured
bulk soil concentrations
Use of other predictive models
and measured concentrations
HQs for most COPCs were above one for every WA.
Predictions differed somewhat between models.
Fraction of samples classified as potentially toxic was
low to moderate.
Plant Community Observations
Comparison of site composition
to native composition
Comparison of site metrics to
reference metrics
Comparison of site metrics to
measured soil nutrient levels
Comparison of site metrics to
measured soil bulk metal
concentrations
Range condition scores were generally highest for the
remediated areas (Zone 2 and 3), and ranged from poor
to fair for other non-remediated areas.
Species diversity, coverage, and biomass for several site
zones were lower than reference. Coverage and
biomass estimates for the surface impoundment (Zone
3) were the lowest measured values in July 2003.
Plant community metrics did not appear to correlate
with most soil nutrient parameters.
Plant community metrics did not appear to correlate
with bulk soil concentrations of most metals.
Interpretation
Estimated HQs are not considered reliable because toxicity
benchmarks for many metals were below typical Utah
background ranges.
Models suggest plant communities may be slightly
impacted at most of the site due to metals in soil.
Plant community composition in remediated areas is more
similar to the expected native community than non-
remediated areas. However, scores only account for
relative composition estimates.
Plant community appears to be adversely impacted on-site
compared to the reference area. It is difficult to establish
clear causality because data are too limited to rule out
contribution from other potential factors.
Observed decreases in site plant community do not appear
to be due to soil nutrient levels.
Observed decreases in site plant community do not appear
to be well characterized by bulk metal soil concentrations.
Soluble fraction of toxic metals in soil is more important
than bulk, therefore metals cannot be excluded as a
potential contributor to phytotoxicity at the site.
Soil Toxicity Tests
Soil Toxicity Tests
No toxicity tests were performed.
~
-------
Table 6-8
Summary of Lines of Evidence for Terrestrial Plants in AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Line of Evidence
Findings
Predictive Approach
Estimated HQs from measured
bulk soil concentrations
Use of other predictive models
and measured concentrations
HQs for most COPCs were above one for all AOCs in
every WA.
Predictions differed somewhat between models.
Fraction of samples classified as potentially toxic was
moderate to severe.
Plant Community Observations
Plant Community Observations
Several areas on site were designated as AOCs due to
visually stressed or absent vegetation. No data on
community metrics were available.
Interpretation
Estimated HQs are not considered reliable because toxicity
benchmarks for many metals were below typical Utah
background ranges.
Models suggest plant communities may be adversely
impacted, severely in some cases, in most AOCs due to
metals in soil.
Observations indicate that plants are adversely impacted or
cannot survive in some AOCs, but correlations between
community metrics and bulk soil concentrations could not
be performed.
Soil Toxicity Tests
Soil Toxicity Tests
No toxicity tests were performed.
~
-------
Table 7-1
Approach for Calculating Wildlife HQs Accounting for Uncertainty and Variability
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Variability
Uncertainty
Best Estimate
Upper Bound
Average (CTE)
HQ Type A
Large & Small Home Range:
HQ Type C
Large & Small Home Range:
Cone. = Mean for EA
Exp. Parameter = Mean for all
Cone. = 95UCL of Mean for EA
Exp. Parameter = Mean for all
High End
(RME)
HQ Type B
Large Home Range:
Cone. = Mean for EA
Exp. Parameter = Upper-Bound for
primary exposure pathway, Mean for
other exposure pathways
Small Home Range:
Cone. = 90th Percentile for EA
Exp. Parameter = Mean for all
HQ Type D
Large Home Range:
Cone. = 95UCL of Mean for EA
Exp. Parameter = Upper-Bound for primary
exposure pathway, Mean for other exposure
pathways
Small Home Range:
Cone. = 95UCL of 90th Percentile for EA
Exp. Parameter = Mean for all
EA = Exposure Area
95UCL = 95% Upper Confidence Limit
HQ Type Matrix.xls
-------
Table 7-2
Average (CTE) Factors for Representative Wildlife Species
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Taxa
Mammalian
Feeding
Guild
Terrestrial
Omnivore
Terrestrial
Insectivore
Aerial
Insectivore
Herbivore
Carnivore
Aquatic
Omnivore
Herbivore
Carnivore
Terrestrial
Insectivore
Aerial
Insectivore
Terrestrial
Omnivore
Selected
Species
American Robin
Northern Flicker
Cliff Swallow
Mourning Dove
Red-tailed Hawk
Mallard
Mule Deer
Red Fox
Masked Shrew
Big Brown Bat
Deer Mouse
Food
Ingestion Rate
(kg ww/kg
BW/day)
1.21
0.58
0.54
0.23
0.10
0.31
0.041
0.069
0.97
0.44
0.27
Water
Ingestion
Rate
(L/kg
BW/day)
0.14
0.11
0.20
0.12
0.057
0.056
0.044
0.085
0.17
0.15
0.15
Sediment
Ingestion Rate
(kg dw/kg
BW/day)
na
na
na
na
na
0.0027
na
na
na
na
na
Soil Ingestion
Rate
(kg dw/kg
BW/day)
0.025
0.012
0.015
0.0049
0
na
0.00013
0.00052
0.040
0
0.0018
Home Range Size
(ha)
small: 0.48 ha
medium: 16-55 ha
medium: assumed
medium: assumed
large: 859 ha
medium: 1 1 1 ha
large: 286 ha
large: 1,038 ha
small: 0.39 ha
medium: assumed
small: 0.077 ha
Dietary
Fraction (DF)
50% plants;
50% terrestrial invertebrates
100% terrestrial invertebrates
100% terrestrial invertebrates
100% plants
100% small mammals
25% aquatic plants
75% benthic invertebrates
100% plants
75% small mammals;
25% plants
100% terrestrial invertebrates
100% terrestrial invertebrates
50% plants;
50% terrestrial invertebrates
See Appendix F for detailed information and sources.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: CTE
11/23/2004
-------
Table 7-3
High End (RME) Factors for Representative Wildlife Species
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Selected Representative
Species
Cliff Swallow
Northern Flicker
Mourning Dove
Red-tailed Hawk
Mule Deer
Big Brown Bat
Mallard
Red Fox (a)
Red Fox (b)
Red Fox (c)
Primary Pathway
Soil Ingestion
Soil Ingestion
Soil Ingestion
Soil Ingestion
Soil Ingestion
Soil Ingestion
Sediment Ingestion
Soil Ingestion
Plant Ingestion
Small Mammal Ingestion
High End (RME) Value
0.030 kg dw/kg BW/d
0.0185kgdw/kgBW/d
0.0097 kg dw/kg BW/d
0.00053 kg dw/kg BW/d
0.00037 kg dw/kg BW/d
0.0035 kg dw/kg BW/d
0.0073 kg dw/kg BW/d
0.00 15 kg dw/kg BW/d
100% plants
100% small mammals
Source
% of Soil in Diet =14%
(2x CTE value)
RME % of Soil in Diet = 16.0%
(assumption)
% of Soil in Diet = 8.0%
(2x CTE value)
% of Soil in Diet = 2.0%
(2x CTE value)
% of Soil in Diet =1.7%
(range max in Beyer et al., 1994)
% of Soil in Diet = 2.0%
(2x CTE value)
% of Sediment in Diet = 13.2%
(range max in Beyer et al., 1998)
% of Soil in Diet = 7. 8%
(range max in Beyer et al., 1994)
Note: For the red fox, the RME parameter could vary depending upon the driving pathway of exposure. Therefore, RME
calculations were performed for three scenarios as follows:
(a) Soil IR = High-end value (RME)
(b)DFplant=100%
(c) DFmammal = 100%, because measured small mammal concentrations were not available this scenario was not
evaluated.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: RME for text
11/23/2004
-------
Table 7-4
Summary of Selected Wildlife Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury, Inorg
Mercury, Org
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Toxicity Reference Values (mg/kg BW/day)
Mammals
NOAEL
1.9
0.32
3.3
2.7
14
1.4
0.25
0.13
0.05
0.48
0.21
10
LOAEL
19
4.7
13.1
632
159
6.9
4.0
32
1.21
1.43
2.1
411
TRVa
6.1
0.059
1.2
51.8
0.532
0.770
6.6
7.34
41
4.70
47
3.1
1.0
2.1
0.25
noTRV
0.83
0.66
63
Source
3
1
2
1
1
1
3b
1
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
Birds
NOAEL
110
5.5
21
1.0
2.3
78
0.45
0.039
1.4
0.23
11
17
LOAEL
—
22
42
5.0
52
776
0.90
0.180
56
0.93
--
172
TRVa
110
noTRV
11
29
noTRV
1.47
2.2
7.61
11
1.63
245
0.64
0.1
8.8
0.46
noTRV
noTRV
11
54
Source
3
2
3
1
3b
1
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
See Appendix C for details on the selected TRV.
a The TRV used to calculate HQs is equal to the Eco-SSL TRV or is the geometric mean of the NOAEL and LOAEL.
The mammalian TRV is based on Cr + (the lower of the Cr + and Cr + values). The avian TRV is based on Cr +
(insufficient toxicity data in birds to derive a TRV for Cr6+).
Source:
1 - USEPA Eco-SSL (2003b)
2 - Engineering Field Activity West (1998)
3 - Sample etal. (1996)
IS&R BERA TRVs.xls: Summary
5/19/2004
-------
Table 7-5a
Total HQs for the Red-tailed Hawk for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
HQType
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J
Nickel Selenium t Thallium Vanadium
All Work
Areas
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
5/19/2004
-------
Table 7-5b
Total HQs for the Mule Deer for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
HQType
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J
Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium
1.6
1.1
2.5
All Work
Areas
2.8
1.2
3.3
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
5/19/2004
-------
Table 7-5c
Total HQs for the Red Fox for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
HQType
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J
Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium
1.1
2.8
1.6
4
2
5.2
3.3
8.6
1.3
3.4
1.5
3.8
1.3
3.3
1.6
3.9
1.5
3.9
1.7
4.4
1
2.7
1.5
3.8
2.3
1.3
3.2
2.1
1.2
2.8
1.9
1.2
2.8
1
2.7
1.2
3
All Work
Areas
1.1
2.8
1.3
3.1
3.9
11
4.7
13
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
5/19/2004
-------
Table 7-5d
Total HQs for the Cliff Swallow for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WA5
WAS
WA7
WA8/WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium Zinc
1.8 NC < < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 11 < 1 < 1 <
3.4 NC < <1 1 <1 <1 21 <1 <1 <
2.5 NC < <1 1.2 <1 <1 24 <1 <1 <
4.6 NC < <1 1.5 <1 1.4 46 <1 <1 <
3.2 NC < <1 <1 <1 <1 6.3 <1 <1 <
6.1 NC < <1 <1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
5.1 NC < <1 1.1 <1 <1 10 <1 <1 <
10 NC < <1 1.3 <1 <1 18 <1 <1 <
2.1 NC < <1 <1 <1 <1 17 <1 <1 <
4 NC < <1 1 <1 <1 32 <1 <1 <
2.4 NC < <1 1.1 <1 <1 30 <1 <1 <
4.4 NC < <1 1.4 <1 1.2 57 <1 <1 <
2.1 NC < <1 <1 <1 <1 18 <1 <1 <
3.9 NC 1.1 <1 1 <1 <1 35 <1 <1 <
2.4 NC 1.2 <1 1.2 <1 <1 40 <1 <1 <
4.6 NC 2.2 <1 1.5 <1 1.4 77 <1 <1 <
2.4 NC <
4.6 NC <
2.7 NC <
5.1 NC 1.
1.7 NC <
3.2 NC <
2.4 NC <
4.4 NC <
1.5 NC <
2.7 NC <
2 NC <
3.8 NC <
1.4 NC <
2.5 NC <
1.8 NC <
3.2 NC <
1.3 NC <
2.3 NC <
1.7 NC <
3.2 NC <
1.7 NC <
3.2 NC <
1.9 NC <
3.5 NC <
1.8 NC <
3.3 NC <
1.9 NC <
3.6 NC <
6.3 NC <
13 NC <
7.5 NC <
15 NC <
<1 <1 <1 <1 18 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 1.3 35 <1 <1 <
<1 1.3 <1 1.1 39 <1 <1 <
<1 1.7 <1 2.2 75 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 20 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 <1 27 <1 <1 <
<1 1.4 <1 1 52 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 7.8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 1.4 14 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 2.5 19 <1 <1 <
<1 1.3 <1 5.1 36 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 9.4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.1 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 10 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 20 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 12 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 10 <1 <1 <
<1 1 <1 <1 17 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 10 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 18 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 13 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 <1 23 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 1.1 <1 <1 <
2.2 NC < 1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
3.3 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.3 NC <1 <
3.5 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.5 NC <1 <
3.8 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 1.
3.7 NC <1 2.
2.2 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.3 NC <1 <
3.5 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
3.3 NC <1 1.
2.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
3.1 NC <1 <
3.1 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
3.1 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
3.1 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
2.2 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
3.2 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
5/19/2004
-------
Table 7-5e
Total HQs for the Mourning Dove for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WA5
WAS
WA7
WA8/WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium Zinc
<1 NC <
1.1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.5 NC <
1 NC <
2 NC <
1.7 NC <
3.2 NC <
<1 NC <
1.3 NC <
<1 NC <
1.4 NC <
<1 NC <
1.3 NC <
<1 NC <
1.5 NC <
<1 NC <
1.5 NC <
<1 NC <
1.7 NC <
<1 NC <
1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.4 NC <
<1 NC <
<1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.2 NC <
<1 NC <
<1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.1 NC <
<1 NC <
<1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.1 NC <
<1 NC <
1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.1 NC <
<1 NC <
1.2 NC <
2 NC <
4.1 NC <
2.4 NC <
4.9 NC <
< 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 3.9 < 1 < 1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 7.1 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 15 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.3 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 5.9 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 5.7 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 10 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 19 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.2 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 13 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 25 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.2 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 13 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 24 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 8.9 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 17 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 4.7 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 1.6 12 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 1.6 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.3 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.1 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.2 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.2 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.6 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.7 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 4.1 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.3 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 5.6 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.5 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.1 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 4.3 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 7.6 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
1.3 NC < 1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.4 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.9 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.4 NC <1 <
1.9 NC <1 <
2 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.4 NC <1 <
1.9 NC <1 <
2 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.9 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.9 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.3 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
1.8 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
5/19/2004
-------
Table 7-5f
Total HQs for the Mallard for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WA5
WAS
WA7
WA8/WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic |
Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium Zinc
< 1 NC < 1
1.1 NC < 1
< 1 NC < 1
2.1 NC < 1
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 8.6 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 7.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 20 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
< 1 NC < 1
< 1 NC < 1
< 1 NC < 1
< 1 NC < 1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC < 1 < 1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 1.8 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
< 1 NC < 1
< 1 NC < 1
< 1 NC < 1
1 NC <1
1.1 NC < 1
3 NC <1
1.3 NC < 1
3.6 NC < 1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC < 1 < 1
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.7 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 2.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.7 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
< 1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC < 1 < 1
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 NC <1 <1
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
6/11/2004
-------
Table 7-5g
Total HQs for the Big Brown Bat for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WA4
WA8/WA11
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum |
3.4
10
4.3
13
3.4
16
4.3
24
3.4
11
4.3
13
3.4
11
4.3
13
3.4
13
4.3
14
3.4
10
4.3
13
3.4
8.7
4.3
12
3.4
8.2
4.3
10
3.4
7.7
4.3
10
3.4
10
4.3
11
3.4
10
4.3
11
NC
26
NC
32
Antimony |
<}
-------
Table 7-5h
Total HQs for the Northern Flicker for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WA5
WAS
WA7
WA8/WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic | Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium Zinc
1.5 NC <
2.2 NC <
2 NC <
2.9 NC <
2.6 NC <
3.8 NC <
4.1 NC <
6.2 NC <
1.7 NC <
2.5 NC <
2 NC <
2.8 NC <
1.7 NC <
2.5 NC <
2 NC <
2.9 NC 1.
2 NC <
2.9 NC <
2.2 NC <
3.2 NC <
1.4 NC <
2 NC <
1.9 NC <
2.8 NC <
1.2 NC <
1.8 NC <
1.7 NC <
2.4 NC <
1.2 NC <
1.6 NC <
1.5 NC <
2.1 NC <
1.1 NC <
1.5 NC <
1.5 NC <
2.1 NC <
1.4 NC <
2 NC <
1.6 NC <
2.3 NC <
1.5 NC <
2.1 NC <
1.6 NC <
2.3 NC <
5 NC <
7.7 NC <
6 NC <
9.2 NC <
<1 <1 <1 <1 10 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 14 <1 <1 <
<1 1.2 <1 <1 20 <1 <1 <
<1 1.3 <1 <1 29 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 5.5 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 7.4 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 <1 8.9 <1 <1 <
<1 1.2 <1 <1 12 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 14 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 20 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 <1 24 <1 <1 <
<1 1.2 <1 <1 36 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 15 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 22 <1 <1 <
<1 1.2 <1 <1 32 <1 <1 <
<1 1.3 <1 <1 48 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 15 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 22 <1 <1 <
<1 1.4 <1 1.3 47 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 9.2 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 13 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 <1 22 <1 <1 <
<1 1.3 <1 <1 33 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.7 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 9.2 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 2 16 <1 <1 <
<1 1.2 <1 3.1 23 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 3.7 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 4.7 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 5.5 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 6.9 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 5.3 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 7.2 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 10 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 13 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 5.8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 8 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 8.4 <1 <1 <
<1 1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 8.4 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 12 <1 <1 <
<1 1 <1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 <1 <1 15 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 NC <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
2.3 NC < 1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
3.5 NC <1 <
3.5 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
3.6 NC <1 <
3.8 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
3.6 NC <1 <
3.7 NC <1 1.
2.3 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
3.5 NC <1 <
3.6 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
3.5 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.3 NC <1 <
3.3 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
3.3 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
2.3 NC <1 <
2.4 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
3.4 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
t
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
11/18/2004
-------
Table 7-51
Total HQs for the American Robin for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WA5
WAS
WA7
WA8/WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum |
3.1
4.5
4.2
7.7
5.4
7.7
8.6
48
3.6
4.8
4
5.9
3.6
5.5
4.1
6.9
4.1
4.9
4.6
6.1
2.9
3.9
4
7.7
2.6
4.2
3.5
6.7
2.4
4.9
3
5.9
2.2
3.9
3
5.9
2.9
4.3
3.2
5.1
3
4.8
3.3
5.8
10
16
12
24
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
Antimony | Arsenic | Barium Cadmium |
NC < < 1 2.1
NC < <1 3.9
NC < <1 3
NC 1.1 <1 6.6
NC < <1 2.1
NC < <1 3.8
NC < <1 2.8
NC 1 <1 19
NC <1 <1 2.1
NC 1.2 <1 4
NC <1 <1 2.9
NC 1.8 <1 6.2
NC <1 <1 2.1
NC 1.6 <1 4.1
NC 2 <1 3
NC 4.3 <1 6.5
NC <1 <1 2.2
NC 1.1 <1 4.3
NC 1.1 <1 3.1
NC 2.3 <1 6.9
NC <1 <1 2
NC <1 <1 3.9
NC <1 <1 2.9
NC 1.2 <1 6.3
NC <1 <1 2
NC <1 <1 3.8
NC <1 <1 2.8
NC 1.2 <1 6.5
NC <1 <1 1.9
NC <1 <1 3.5
NC <1 <1 2.5
NC <1 <1 5.4
NC <1 <1 1.9
NC <1 <1 3.5
NC <1 <1 2.5
NC 1.2 <1 5.4
NC <1 <1 1.9
NC <1 <1 3.6
NC <1 <1 2.6
NC <1 <1 5.6
NC <1 <1 2
NC 1 <1 3.8
NC <1 <1 2.7
NC 1.1 <1 5.8
NC <1 <1 NC
NC <1 <1 NC
NC <1 <1 NC
NC <1 <1 NC
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium Zinc
< 1 < 1 20 < 1 < 1 <
<1 <1 33 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 41 <1 <1 <
<1 2.8 100 <1 1 <
<1 <1 12 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 19 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 18 <1 <1 <
1.2 2.6 270 <1 1.1 <
<1 <1 29 <1 <1 <
<1 1.4 57 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 51 <1 <1 <
<1 2.2 110 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 31 <1 <1 <
<1 1.2 67 <1 <1 <
<1 1.2 67 <1 <1 <
<1 2.8 150 <1 1.1 <
<1 1.1 31 <1 <1 <
<1 2.3 60 <1 <1 <
<1 1.8 65 <1 <1 <
<1 4.2 170 <1 1.7 <
<1 <1 19 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 47 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 46 <1 <1 <
<1 1.1 14 <1 <1 <
<1 3.2 27 <1 <1 <
<1 4.2 33 <1 <1 <
<1 11 77 <1 1.1 <
<1 <1 7.9 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 17 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 24 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 11 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 26 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 19 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 44 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 12 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 24 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 17 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 36 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 18 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 35 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 22 <1 <1 <
<1 1.3 49 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <
1.1 <1 1.1 <1 <1 <
5.9 NC < 1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.2 NC <1 <
17 NC <1 <
5.8 NC <1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.2 NC <1 <
20 NC 1 ^H
5.9 NC < 1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.4 NC <1 <
17 NC <1 <
5.9 NC < 1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.7 NC <1 <
18 NC <1 <
«
6 NC < 1 <
15 NC <1 1
18 NC <1 4.1
5.9 NC < 1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.4 NC <1 <
17 NC <1 <
5.9 NC < 1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.3 NC <1 1.
17 NC <1 3.
5.8 NC <1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.1 NC <1 <
17 NC <1 <
5.8 NC <1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.2 NC <1 <
17 NC <1 <
5.8 NC <1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.2 NC <1 <
17 NC <1 <
5.9 NC < 1 <
15 NC <1 <
8.2 NC <1 <
17 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
<1 NC <1 <
NC = Not Calculated, TRY not available or concentration data not available
"|" For these chemicals, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants and terrestrial invertebrates
| For mercury, site Total HQs include food ingestion based on measured tissue concentrations in plants
For all other chemicals, site Total HQs based only on ingestion of surface water and incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
For Utah bkg, Total HQs based only on incidental ingestion of soil/sediment.
Total HQ Summ_AII Types.xls, HQ summ_ALL
11/18/2004
-------
Table 7-5j
Total HQs for the Masked Shrew for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WA5
WAS
WA7
WA8/WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum | Antimony | Arsenic |
83 3.8 4
120 8.2 6.1
110 7.9 6.2
210 19 13
150 2.7 2.6
210 4.7 4.2
240 4.8 3.6
1400 67 12
100 6.8 7.2
130 12 15
110 11 11
160 27 23
100 7 13
150 16 21
110 26 27
190 45 60
110 7.7 8.9
130 14 14
120 16 14
170 43 31
78 4 3.8
100 9.4 7.8
110 10 6.4
210 23 14
68 3.6 3.9
110 6.7 7.4
92 7 6.8
180 17 15
62 1.5 2.8
130 3.5 5.5
80 2.7 3.8
160 6.4 7.7
57 2.7 3.9
100 5.8 7.7
79 4.8 6.5
160 11 15
78 2.6 3.3
120 5.3 6.8
86 4.4 4.1
140 10 8.3
80 3.9 5.3
130 8.5 12
89 5.8 6.6
160 13 13
300 < 1 < 1
460 < 1 < 1
360 < 1 < 1
680 < 1 < 1
Barium Cadmium | Chromium Copper Lead | Manganese Mercury J Nickel Selenium | Thallium Vanadium Zinc
< 1 3.1 < 1 < 1 10 < 1 < 1 <
<1 4.9 <1 <1 16 <1 <1 <
<1 4.7 <1 <1 22 <1 <1 <
<1 10 <1 1.2 51 <1 <1 <
<1 3 <1 <1 5.3 <1 <1 <
<1 4.7 <1 <1 8.5 <1 <1 <
<1 4.1 <1 <1 8.7 <1 <1 <
<1 49 <1 1.1 150 <1 <1 <
<1 3.2 <1 <1 15 <1 <1 <
<1 5.2 <1 <1 30 <1 <1 <
<1 4.2 <1 <1 27 <1 <1 <
<1 8.6 <1 <1 61 <1 <1 <
<1 3.2 <1 <1 16 <1 <1 <
<1 5.6 <1 <1 35 <1 <1 <
<1 4.5 <1 <1 36 <1 <1 <
<1 9.4 <1 1.2 81 1.2 <1 <
<1 3.5 <1 <1 16 <1 <1 <
<1 6.1 <1 1 31 1.3 <1 <
<1 5.1 <1 <1 35 1.1 <1 <
|
-------
Table 7-5k
Total HQs for the Deer Mouse for Non-AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WA5
WAS
WA7
WA8/WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Utah Bkg
HQType
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Aluminum |
5.3
7.9
7.1
13
8.2
12
13
64
6
8.4
6.9
10
6
9.2
7
12
6.7
8.5
7.6
11
5.1
7.2
6.9
13
4.7
7.6
6.2
11
4.4
8.4
5.6
10
4.2
7.2
5.6
10
5.1
7.7
5.9
9.4
5.2
8.3
6
10
13
20
16
30
Antimony |
<
<
1.8
<
<
<
3.8
< 1
1.1
2.1
< 1
1.3
1.5
2.9
< 1
1.2
1.1
2.8
< 1
< 1
<1
1.9
< 1
< 1
<1
1.6
< 1
<}
1.2
< 1
< 1
<1
< 1
< 1
<1
1.4
< 1
<1
<1
1.5
< 1
< |
<1
<1
Arsenic |
<}
-------
Table 7-6
Estimated HQs for Non-AOCs (Across All WAs) from All Exposure Pathways
Baseline Ecological Rish Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Chemical
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
HQ Type
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Small Home Range
American
Robin
3
4.8
3.3
5.8
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
1
<1
1.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2
3.8
2.7
5.8
<1
<
<
<
<
<
<
1.3
18
35
22
49
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
5.9
15
8.2
17
NC
NC
NC
NC
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Masked
Shrew
80
130
89
160
3.9
8.5
5.8
13
5.3
12
6.6
13
<1
<1
<1
<1
2.8
4.6
3.6
7.3
<1
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
8.7
17
11
25
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
7.5
16
11
23
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.2
1.9
1.3
2.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Deer Mouse
5.2
8.3
6
10
<1
<1
<1
1.5
<1
1.1
<1
1.2
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.5
1.1
2.3
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.3
<1
1.8
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2.4
6.3
3.4
7
<1
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Medium Home Range
Cliff Swallow
1.8
3.3
1.9
3.6
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.1
<1
<1
<1
<
<
<
<
<
10
18
13
23
<1
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
2.2
2.2
3.2
3.2
NC
NC
NC
NC
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Mourning
Dove
<1
1.1
<1
1.2
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
3.5
6.1
4.3
7.6
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.8
NC
NC
NC
NC
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Big Brown
Bat
3.4
10
4.3
11
<1
<1
<1
1.2
<1
<1
<1
1.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1
1.1
1.3
1.4
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.2
<1
1.6
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
3.3
3.3
4.8
4.8
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Northern
Flicker
1.5
2.1
1.6
2.3
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1
1.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
8.4
12
11
15
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2.3
2.4
3.4
3.4
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Mallard
<1
<1
<1
1
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
2.7
2.5
6.7
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Large Home Range
Mule Deer
<1
<1
<1
1.
<
<
<
<
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Red Fox
1.1
2.8
1.3
3.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<
<
<
1
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<1
<1
<1
<1
Red-tailed
Hawk
<1
<1
<1
<1
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
HQ Type A:
HQ Type B:
HQ Type C:
HQ Type D:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
-------
Table 7-7
Metals of Potential Concern Based the Range of Wildlife Total HQ Estimates for Non-AOCs
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WA3
WA4
WAS
WA6
WA7
WAS/
WA11
WA9
WA10
All Work
Areas
Small Home Range
American Robin
Cd, Pb, Se,
(As), (Cu)
Cd, Pb, Se,
(Cu), (Hg), (Zn)
Cd, Pb, Se,
(As), (Cu)
Cd, Pb, Se,
(As), (Cu), (Hg)
Cd, Cu, Pb, Se,
(As), (Cu), (Hg), (Zn)
Cd, Pb, Se,
(As), (Cu)
Cd, Pb, Se,
(As), (Cu), (Hg), (Zn)
Cd, Pb, Se
Cd, Pb, Se,
(As)
Cd, Pb, Se
Cd, Pb, Se,
(As), (Cu)
Masked Shrew
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se,
(Cu), (Zn)
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se,
(Cu), (Tl), (Zn)
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se,
(Zn)
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se,
(Cu), (Mn), (Zn)
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se,
(Cu), (Mn), (Zn)
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se,
(Cu), (Mn), (Zn)
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se
Sb, As, Cd, Pb, Se
Deer Mouse
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb), (Tl)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Medium Home Range
Cliff Swallow
Pb, Se,
(Cd), (Cu)
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Pb, Se,
(Cd), (Cu)
Pb, Se,
(As), (Cd), (Cu)
Pb, Se,
(As), (Cd), (Cu), (Zn)
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Pb, Se,
(Cd), (Cu), (Zn)
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Mourning Dove
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se,
(Cu)
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Big Brown Bat
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Cd)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Se,
(Sb), (As), (Cd), (Pb)
Northern Flicker
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Pb, Se,
(As), (Cd)
Pb, Se,
(Cd), (Cu), (Zn)
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Pb, Se,
(Cd), (Cu)
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se
Pb, Se,
(Cd)
Mallard
--
-
Pb
--
--
--
(Pb)
--
--
--
(Pb)
Large Home Range
Mule Deer
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
Red Fox
none
none
none
(Pb)
(Pb)
none
none
none
none
none
none
Red-tailed
Hawk
none
none
none
(Pb)
(Pb)
none
none
none
none
none
none
The range of estimated risks (Type A to Type D) from COPCs shown in parentheses cross an HQ of 1 and interpretation is uncertain.
HQ Drivers.xls, metals
11/23/2004
-------
Table 7-8
Exposure Pathways Contributing Most to Predicted Risks for the Deer Mouse in Non-AOCs
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
SELENIUM
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WAS
WA6
WA7
WAS/
WA11
WA9
WA10
All WAs
Utah
Bkgc
HQ TYPE A (CTE, Best Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water"
Plants'1
Invertebrates
Total HQ
0.009
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.43
0.004
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.43
0.019
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.44
0.021
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.44
0.022
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.45
0.011
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.43
0.010
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.43
0.002
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.42
0.004
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.43
0.005
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.43
0.010
0.0016
1.42
1.00
2.43
0.002
-
HQ TYPE B (RME, Best Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water
Plants
Invertebrates
Total HQ
0.013
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.31
0.007
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.30
0.046
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.34
0.050
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.34
0.051
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.34
0.034
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.33
0.022
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.32
0.003
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.30
0.010
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.30
0.011
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.30
0.025
0.0027
4.18
2.11
6.32
0.003
-
HQ TYPE C (CTE, Upper-Bound Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water
Plants
Invertebrates
Total HQ
0.019
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.41
0.009
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.40
0.039
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.43
0.081
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.48
0.064
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.46
0.045
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.44
0.025
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.42
0.003
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.40
0.007
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.40
0.007
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.40
0.012
0.0025
1.94
1.45
3.41
0.003
-
HQ TYPE D (RME, Upper-Bound Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water
Plants
Invertebrates
Total HQ
0.046
0.0056
3.81
3.14
7.00
0.513
0.0056
3.81
3.14
7.47
0.090
0.0056
3.81
3.14
7.04
0.158
0.0056
3.81
3.14
7.11
0.160
0.0056
3.81
3.14
7.11
0.102
0.0056
3.81
3.14
7.06
0.065
0.0056
3.81
3.14
7.02
0.005
0.0056
3.81
3.14
6.96
0.016
0.0056
3.81
3.14
6.97
0.014
0.0056
3.81
3.14
6.97
0.026
0.0056
3.81
3.14
6.98
0.005
-
LEAD
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
WAS
WA6
WA7
WAS/
WA11
WA9
WA10
All WAs
Utah
Bkgc
HQ TYPE A (CTE, Best Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water"
Plants'1
Invertebrates'1
Total HQ
0.39
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.71
0.18
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.50
0.61
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.93
0.67
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.98
0.67
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.98
0.37
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.69
0.25
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.56
0.09
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.41
0.18
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.49
0.20
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.52
0.33
0.0018
0.16
0.15
0.65
0.013
0.013
HQ TYPE B (RME, Best Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water
Plants
Invertebrates
Total HQ
0.63
0.0058
0.33
0.25
1.22
0.29
0.0058
0.33
0.25
0.87
1.22
0.0058
0.33
0.25
1.81
1.46
0.0058
0.33
0.25
2.04
1.29
0.0058
0.33
0.25
1.87
0.96
0.0058
0.33
0.25
1.55
0.49
0.0058
0.33
0.25
1.07
0.24
0.0058
0.33
0.25
0.83
0.45
0.0058
0.33
0.25
1.03
0.39
0.0058
0.33
0.25
0.98
0.68
0.0058
0.33
0.25
1.27
0.014
0.014
HQ TYPE C (CTE, Upper-Bound Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water
Plants
Invertebrates
Total HQ
0.88
0.0094
0.20
0.23
1.31
0.31
0.0094
0.20
0.23
0.74
1.11
0.0094
0.20
0.23
1.54
1.51
0.0094
0.20
0.23
1.94
1.46
0.0094
0.20
0.23
1.90
0.99
0.0094
0.20
0.23
1.43
0.68
0.0094
0.20
0.23
1.11
0.14
0.0094
0.20
0.23
0.57
0.34
0.0094
0.20
0.23
0.78
0.29
0.0094
0.20
0.23
0.72
0.41
0.0094
0.20
0.23
0.85
0.023
0.023
HQ TYPE D (RME, Upper-Bound Estimate)
Soil
Surface Water
Plants
Invertebrates
Total HQ
2.06
0.012
0.37
0.50
2.94
6.33
0.012
0.37
0.50
7.20
2.53
0.012
0.37
0.50
3.40
3.39
0.012
0.37
0.50
4.26
3.78
0.012
0.37
0.50
4.66
2.40
0.012
0.37
0.50
3.27
1.61
0.012
0.37
0.50
2.48
0.31
0.012
0.37
0.50
1.19
0.80
0.012
0.37
0.50
1.67
0.62
0.012
0.37
0.50
1.49
0.93
0.012
0.37
0.50
1.80
0.03
0.03
" Surface water exposures can only occur in WA3 (run-off ponds) and WA7 (Pine Creek). However, for the purposes of estimating risks from surface water, exposure point
concentrations for each WA were set equal to the highest exposure point concentration value of WA3 or WA7.
b Plant and invertebrate tissue concentrations were measured for selenium and lead at several WAs. Because measured tissue concentrations did not appear to correlate
with soil concentration, exposure point concentrations for each WA were based on the consolidated dataset for the entire IS&R site.
0 Measured food item and surface water concentrations not available for Utah bkg; Total HQ based on incidential soil ingestion only.
Deer Mouse HQ example.xls, 6/11/2004
-------
Table 7-9
Estimated HQs for AOCs (Across All WAs) from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Chemical
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
HQ Type
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Small Home Range
American
Robin
2
3.2
2.3
4.2
NC
NC
NC
NC
2.7
4.9
4.1
7
<1
<1
<1
<1
5.8
1.1
14
3.7
<1
<1
<1
<1
4
3.2
8.3
5.9
82
240
140
300
2.3
1.3
<1
2.2
2.5
NC
NC
NC
NC
1.2
<1
1.9
Masked
Shrew
57
94
65
120
27
74
73
110
39
71
59
100
<1
<1
<1
<1
18
3.3
44
12
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.7
1.4
3.6
2.5
46
130
78
170
<1
1.1
<1
1.5
3.9
2.7
6.8
7.6
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.2
1.9
1.3
2.2
<1
1.7
1.3
2.7
Deer Mouse
2.5
4.1
2.9
5.3
1.2
3.2
3.2
4.9
1.7
3.1
2.6
4.5
1.9
2
5.8
3.4
7.3
Medium Home Range
Cliff Swallow
1.2
2.4
1.4
2.7
NC
NC
NC
NC
1.6
3.3
2.5
4.9
<1
<1
<1
<1
3.5
7.1
8.6
17
<1
<1
<1
<1
2.4
4.8
5
10
50
100
84
170
1.1
1.4
2.7
1.5
1.3
2.7
NC
NC
NC
NC
1.1
Mourning
Dove
<1
<1
<1
<1
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
1.1
<1
1.6
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.1
2.3
2.8
5.6
1.5
1.6
3.2
16
32
27
55
NC
NC
NC
NC
Big Brown
Bat
NC
5
NC
5.7
NC
2.4
NC
6.3
NC
3.4
NC
5.2
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
1.6
NC
3.8
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
4
NC
6.8
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
Northern
Flicker
<1
1.4
1.1
1.7
NC
NC
NC
NC
1.3
2
2
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
2.8
4.3
6.8
11
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.9
2.9
4
6.1
39
61
67
100
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.1
1.7
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.1
1.6
NC
NC
NC
NC
Large Home Range
Mule Deer
Red Fox
<1
2
<1
2.3
<1
<1
<1
2.6
<1
1.4
<1
2.1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.6
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
1.7
1
2.8
Red-tailed
Hawk
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
1.7
NC
3
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
NC
<1
HQ Type A:
HQTypeB:
HQ Type C:
HQTypeD:
CTE Receptor, Best Estimate
RME Receptor, Best Estimate
CTE Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
RME Receptor, Upper-Bound Estimate
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
-------
Table 7-10
Summary of Lines of Evidence for Wildlife Receptors with Large Home Ranges
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Line of Evidence
Findings
Interpretation
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Surface Water
Estimated HQs from measured
surface water concentrations
HQs for all chemicals for all
receptors were below a level of
concern (less than 1).
Risk estimates indicate that ingestion of surface water is not likely to have
adverse impacts on wildlife receptors.
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Sediment/Soil in Non-AOCs
Estimated HQs from measured
bulk sediment/soil concentrations
[See Appendix I for detailed HQ
calculations]
Risks estimates indicate that large home range receptors are not likely to
adversely impacted by ingestion of soil from Non-AOC locations.
be
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Soil in AOCs
Estimated HQs from measured
bulk sediment/soil concentrations
HQs for soil were low or below a
level of concern for most
chemicals. HQs are only above 1
for an RME receptor.
Risk estimates indicate that if a large home range receptor were to
preferentially feed in AOC locations, may be slightly impacted due to
elevated levels of metals in soil. However, given the small spatial extent
AOCs relative to the total home range size, this exposure scenario is
unlikely.
of
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Food Items
Estimated HQs from measured
food item concentrations
[See Appendix I for detailed HQ
calculations]
Risks estimates indicate that large home range receptors are not likely to
adversely impacted by ingestion of food items from Non-AOC locations.
be
All Exposure Pathways Combined
Site-Specific Toxicity Tests
Wildlife Community Surveys
Site-specific toxicity assessments
not performed.
Not evaluated.
~
~
-------
Table 7-11
Summary of Lines of Evidence for Wildlife Receptors with Small/Medium Home Ranges
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Line of Evidence
Findings
Interpretation
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Surface Water
Estimated HQs from measured
surface water concentrations
HQs for all chemicals for all
receptors were below a level of
concern (less than 1).
Risk estimates indicate that ingestion of surface water is not likely to have
adverse impacts on wildlife receptors.
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Sediment/Soil in Non-AOCs
Estimated HQs from measured
bulk sediment/soil concentrations
[See Appendix I for detailed HQ
calculations]
Risk estimates for medium/small home range receptors indicate the primary
metal of concern for incidental ingestion of sediment/soil is lead. Other
metals are also in a range of concern for small insectivorous receptors.
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Soil in AOCs
Estimated HQs from measured
bulk sediment/soil concentrations
HQs for several chemicals were
above a level of concern for all
receptors, even when based on the
least conservative exposure
scenarios (HQ Type A).
Risk estimates indicate that adverse effects are likely due to multiple metals
in AOC soils. Because there is the potential for a home range to include an
AOC location, the likelihood that a small/medium home range receptor will
feed from these areas is high even though the spatial extent of AOCs is low.
Exposure Pathway: Ingestion of Food Items
Estimated HQs from measured
food item concentrations
[See Appendix I for detailed HQ
calculations]
Primary contributors to predicted food web risks for medium/small home
range receptors were cadmium and selenium in plants and terrestrial
invertebrate tissues. Food ingestion HQs were calculated using only
measured data, actual risks may be higher than HQ estimates.
All Exposure Pathways Combined
Site-Specific Toxicity Tests
Wildlife Community Surveys
Site-specific toxicity assessments
not performed.
Not evaluated.
~
~
-------
Table 8-1
Summary of COPCs Assigned to the Qualitative Evaluation Category
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Receptor:
Pathway:
Qual COPC -
Type 1
(no toxicity
benchmark)
Qual COPC -
Type 2
(inadequate
detection limit)
Aquatic Receptors (Benthics)
Direct Contact w/
Surface Water
Acidity
Nitrate
Sulfate
TSS
Silver
Direct Contact w/
Sediment
Beryllium
Calcium
Cobalt
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
Thallium
none
Terrestrial Receptors
(Plants, Soil Organisms)
Direct Contact w/
Surface Soil
Calcium
Chloride
Iron
Magnesium
Nitrite
Potassium
Sodium
Thallium
none
Wildlife Receptors
(Mammals & Birds)
Ingestionof Food, Soil, Sediment,
and Surface Water
Mammal:
Chloride
Cobalt
Nitrite
Silver
none
Bird:
Antimony
Beryllium
Chloride
Nitrite
Silver
Thallium
none
Table 8-1 Qual Chem Lists.xls
5/19/2004
-------
Table 8-2
Summary of Uncertainties in the Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Assessment
Component
Nature and Extent
of Contamination
Exposure
Assessment
Toxicity
Assessment
Uncertainty Description
Samples collected may not be fully representative of variability in
space or time, especially if the number of samples is small.
Analytical results may be imprecise.
Some exposure pathways were not evaluated.
Some chemicals were not evaluated because chemical was never
detected, but detection limit was too high to detect the chemical if it
were present at a level of concern.
Exposure point concentrations for wildlife receptors are based on a
limited measured dataset.
Exposure parameters for wildlife receptors are based on studies at
other sites.
Absorption from site media is assumed to be the same as in laboratory
studies.
Wildlife receptors selected as representative species may not capture
the full range of sensitivities in site receptors.
Aquatic toxicity benchmarks are based on a wide range of species,
some of which do not occur at this site.
Many chemicals lack reliable toxicity benchmarks for some receptors
for some media; these chemicals are not evaluated.
Available toxicity benchmarks are often based on limited data, and
values must be extrapolated across species.
Likely Direction
of Error
Unknown
Unknown
Underestimate of risk
Underestimate of risk
Use of UCL or max detect
is likely to overestimate
risk
Unknown
Overestimate of risks
Unknown
Likely to overestimate risk
Underestimation of risk
Unknown
Likely Magnitude
of Error
Probably small
Probably small
Unknown, could be significant
Usually small
Variable (depends on number
of data points and magnitude of
variability); can be evaluated
by comparing best estimate to
upper bound estimate
Probably small
Possibly significant
Probably small
Probably small
Probably small in most cases
Unknown, could be significant
Table 8-2 Uncertainty Summary.wpd
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table 8-2
Summary of Uncertainties in the Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Assessment
Component
Toxicity
Assessment (cont.)
Risk
Characterization
Uncertainty Description
Available toxicity benchmarks are often based on limited data, and
values are often adjusted with uncertainty factors to account for
extrapolation across dose (LOAEL to NOAEL) or duration (acute to
chronic).
Dose-response curves and toxicity benchmarks based on laboratory
studies are assumed to be applicable to free-living populations in the
field.
Interactions between chemicals are difficult to account for; effects of
one chemical may increase, decrease, or have no effect on other
chemicals.
Estimation of population-level effects from HQ calculations is
difficult and subject to professional judgement.
Likely Direction
of Error
Likely to overestimate in
most cases
Unknown; variability
maybe higher in wild
populations than
laboratory animals, hence
high end risks may tend to
be underestimated
Unknown
Unknown
Likely Magnitude
of Error
Unknown, could be significant
Unknown, probably minor
Unknown, but probably small
Unknown, probably small in
most cases
Table 8-2 Uncertainty Summary.wpd
Page 2 of 2
-------
r. r
.., -' •'"
N
A
Figure 1-1 Site Location Map
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
'•3 a
.2 o
X '-M
Wo3
H
o
a
o
• i-H
+J
O
o
O
03
to
Q
STEP1: SCREENING LEVEL
• Site Visit
• Problem Formulation
• Toxicity Evaluation
STEP 2: SCREENING LEVEL
• Exposure Estimate
• Risk Characterization
STEP 3: PROBLEM FORMULATION
Toxicity Evaluation
Assessment
Endpoints
Conceptual Model
Exposure Pathways
Questions/Hypotheses
STEP 4: STUDY DESIGN AND DQO
PROCESS
• Lines of Evidence
• Measurement Endpoints
Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
STEP 5: VERIFICATION OF FIELD
SAMPLING DESIGN
STEP 6: SITE INVESTIGATION AND
DATA ANALYSIS
STEP 7: RISK CHARACTERIZATION
Steps 1 & 2 - Tier 1 (Screening-Level Assessment)
Steps 3 to 7 - Tier 2 (Baseline Assessment)
Source: USEPA 1997
Risk Assessor
and Risk
Manager
Agreement
SMDP
SMDP
SMDP
SMDP
SMDP
STEP 8:
RISK MANAGEMENT
t
SMDP
SMDP = Scientific/Management Decision Point
Figure 1-2 Eight Step Process for Ecological
Risk Assessment at Superfund Sites
Fig 1-2 ERAGs.doc
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Figure 2-1 Site Location and Features Map
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
T J
r<
• ..
Lincoln '••':.• «„.
f—-»-' . •'
I- '
: -
Map Source: AECI Work Area Data Summary Reports 2001-2002
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Figure 2-2
Terrestrial Vegetation Zones Within the IS&R Site Boundaries
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone 1: Mountain Shrub without Disturbances
Zone 2: Mountain Shrub with Disturbances
Zone 3: Sagebrush-Grass Steppe with Revegetated
Tailings Facilities
Zone 4: Pine Creek Canyon Riparian Area
Zone 5: Sagebrush-Grass Steppe without Disturbances
fro
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Figure 3-1
Boundaries of Site Work Areas (WAs)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Figure 3-2 2003 Field Investigation Sampling Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
trie
Map Source: AECI IS&R/Carr Fork Remedial Investigation - Data Summary Report for Eco-Risk Sampling (AECI, 2003b)
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Figure 4-1
Site Conceptual Model for Ecological Exposure
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting and Refining Site
Source
Smelting and
Refining Operations
LEG
Primary Release
Mechanism
EN]
X
o
•
Historic Stack
Emissions
Solid Waste Disposal
(tailings, slag, waste
rock, etc.)
0
Potentially Impacted Environmental Media Exposure Route
/
* Surface Soil,
1 — ^- Tailings
\
Groundwater
a
* Surface Water
k c- i- /a
* Sediment
Aquatic
Receptors
Benthics
Terrestrial Receptors
(Plants & Invert.)
Plants
Soil
Organisms
Wildlife Receptors (Birds
& Mammals)
Riparian
Upland
Amphibians
& Reptiles
Inhalation
/^ Direct Contact
X
X
X
X
Ingestion
Direct Contact
NV Terrestrial Food Items
(Plants, Mammals, H Ingestion
Invertebrates)
Ingestion
Direct Contact
•
•
•
X
•
X
O
0
•
•
O
• /Xe
Xd
X
Xd
X
O
0
^ (Benthic Invertebrates & *] Ingestion
O
•
o
-^ Plants)
Ingestion
Direct Contact
0
•
•b
X
0
0
Pathway is not complete; no evaluation required
Pathway is complete, but is judged to be minor compared to other exposure pathways; qualitative evaluation
Pathway is complete and might be significant; but insufficient data are available for quantitative evaluation
Pathway is complete and might be significant; sufficient data are available for quantitative evaluation
Notes:
a Exposure locations include Pine Creek and run-off ponds.
b Due to the temporal nature of the run-off ponds, sediments at these locations will also be evaluated as soils.
c Aquatic habitats (Pine Creek, run-off ponds) at the IS&R site are not expected to support fish.
d Based on the results of the SLERA, exposures from ingestion of surface water were below a level of concern.
e Based on the results of the SLERA, exposures from direct contact with surface water were below a level of concern for Pine Creek but above a level of concern for the run-off ponds.
Fig 4-1 IS&R Eco SCM.xls
-------
Figure 4-2
Conceptual Approach for Characterizing Population-Level Risks
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
100
•
0.01
V
None Minimal Moderate High Severe
Qualitative Level of Concern for Population Effects
Fig 4-2 HQ Approach.xls
-------
Figure 5-1
Schematic Maps of Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Locations
in Pine Creek and at the Run-Off Ponds
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
. Sed: 75
historical
dump
Sampling Stations for Pine Creek (WA 7)
Note: Surface water station SW17 not shown,
located further upstream
vj Sediment Station
\^J Surface Water Station
Sed: 82
SW: ACSW5 Sed: 83
SW12 WA2Slag
'Pile
PINE CREEK
Sed: 85
N
I
Flow
Direction
Sediment Stations 78, 79, 81, and 82 are located close to stations sampled during the 2003 field
investigation (stations 03 SED, 04 SED, 01 SED, and 02 SED, respectively).
Sampling Stations ',
for Run-Off Ponds j Pond # 1X^"V)
(WA3/WA4) / f )
WA6
t
WA3N
FORMER
SMELTER
SITE
Pond #4 S^
Pond #5 ^---.,
/^. WA4 ->...__
Dry Creek Channel * ~ > ,
Pond #2
id #3 N
> t
— — — WA boundary
^ Sediment Station
CH Surface Water Station
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
Figure 6-1
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations of Arsenic
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
5.0
S 4'5
8. 4-°
£ 3.5
* 3.0
SP
-) c
OJ
•§ 2.0
y = -0.0027x + 3.1171
R2 = 0.0505
100 150 200 250
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
300 350
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 5.7032x + 452.75
R2 = 0.4017 *
100 150 200 250
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
300 350
I 4 "i
!3
<
1 9
-------
Figure 6-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations of Iron
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
8 4.5 -
g, 4.0 -
? 3.5-
* 3.0 -
g 2.5-
<: 2.0 -
8 1.5 -
o
S-L0~
>? 0.5 -
40 60 80
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
3000 -
1
I 2500 -
3
bO
• S 2000 -
3 'S1
QJ fi
g> Jo 1500 -
« S-
1" 1000 -
° 500 -
y = 14.047x + 686.64
R2 = 0.2257
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
20 40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
6.0 -t
4.0 -
<
c4 2.1
y = -0.0258x+4.2259
R2 = 0.3626
40 60 80
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
100
-5-
40 60 80
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-2.0E-02
0.048
% cover
4.9E-03
0.002
biomass
1.4E+01
0.059
Dec-02
# species
-2.6E-02
0.019
% cover
-7.5E-05
0.448
Soil Nutrient vs Bulk Conc.xls (Fig 6-1_6-2)
6/10/2004
-------
Figure 7-1
Exposure Pathways Contributing Most to Predicted Risks for the Deer Mouse in Non-AOCs
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
Selenium HQs (All WAs)
o nn _,
7 nn
/.uu
/~v f, nn
+^ 5 00
.«
o A nn
— 4-.UU
o-
"® "3 nn
OS
a
a 2.00 -
i nn
Onn
7.0
1.0
1.4
0.3
2.1
4.2
3 A
1.5
...... 1Q ......
3.1
3.8
—
TypeAHQ Type B HQ Type C HQ Type D HQ
D Invertebrates
D Plants
D Surface Water
DSoil
Lead HQs (All WAs)
9 00 -i
2^: i «n
Hazard Quotient (HC
D
-------
This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing.
-------
APPENDIX A
Results of the 2003 Field Investigation to Support Ecological Risk Assessment
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
A-l Bulk Sediment and Sediment Porewater Concentrations
A-2 Terrestrial Vegetation Tissue Concentrations (including co-located surface soil concentrations)
A-3 Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations (including co-located surface soil concentrations)
See table provided in main text
5-3 SEM/AVS Results
5-5 Sediment Toxicity Results
6-2 Plant Community Metrics (station- and species-specific details in Appendix D)
6-3 Range Condition Method Results
6-6 Soil Nutrient Levels
A_CoverPage.xls
-------
Table A-1
Sediment Data Summary
ISR Ecological Sampling
(Results given in ppm dry weight)
1 of 1
Field Data Results
Field Sample ID
Media
% Solids
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Results in mg/kg (dry weight)
*01 SEDCHEM
*02 SEDCHEM
-01 SEDCHEM
-02 SEDCHEM
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
77.2%
45.4%
77.2%
45.4%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
13.0
17.4
3.3
3.9
<0.93
2.3
0.80
1.9
89.5
119
18.8
43.4
94.9
184
64.1
105
0.038
0.11
0.0037
0.0053
N/A
N/A
1.5
4.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
278
446
96.8
146
Results in ug/L
+01 SEDPEEPA
+01 SED PEEP E
+02 SED PEEP A
+02 SED PEEP B
+02 SED PEEP C
+02 SED PEEP D
+02 SED PEEP E
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
129
195
134
168
140
124
168
4.9
4.7
4.5
6.4
5.3
4.4
4.7
<0.10
0.13
<0.10
<0.10
0.19
<0.10
0.13
4.6
7.0
3.7
2.4
4.2
3.6
5.2
1.3
4.6
1.0
1.0
2.2
0.87
3.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
6.2
24.9
5.4
18.8
10.4
4.6
10.9
NOTE: (*) Metals in Soils Analysis (~) Simultaneously Extractable Metals in Soils Analysis (+) Dissolved Metals Analysis (N/A) Not Analyzed
Field sample results as originally provided in the Eco-Risk Sampling Data Summary Report (AECI 2003b) and subsequently revised in AECI (2004d).
A-1_Sediment Sample Results.xls
6/10/2004, 1:47 PM
-------
Table A-2
Vegetation Data Summary
ISR Ecological Sampling
(Results given in ppm dry weight)
1 of 2
Field Data Vegetation Results
Field Data Surface Soil (0-2 inches) Results
Field Sample ID
LOCATION 2 FORB
LOCATION 2 GRASS
LOCATION 2 SHRUB
LOCATION 4 FORB
LOCATION 4 GRASS
LOCATION 4 SHRUB
LOCATION 21 FORB
LOCATION 21 GRASS
LOCATION 21 SHRUB
LOCATION 22 FORB
LOCATION 22 GRASS
LOCATION 22 SHRUB
LOCATION 23 FORB
LOCATION 23 GRASS
LOCATION 23 SHRUB
LOCATION 24 FORB
LOCATION 24 GRASS
LOCATION 24 SHRUB
LOCATION 47 FORB
LOCATION 47 GRASS
LOCATION 47 SHRUB
LOCATION 50 FORB
LOCATION 50 GRASS
LOCATION 50 SHRUB
LOCATION 56 FORB
LOCATION 56 GRASS
LOCATION 56 SHRUB
LOCATION 63 FORB
LOCATION 63 GRASS
LOCATION 63 SHRUB
LOCATION 66 FORB
LOCATION 66 GRASS
LOCATION 66 SHRUB
LOCATION 67 FORB
LOCATION 67 GRASS
LOCATION 67 SHRUB
LOCATION 68 FORB
LOCATION 68 GRASS
LOCATION 68 SHRUB
LOCATION 69 FORB
LOCATION 69 GRASS
LOCATION 69 SHRUB
LOCATION 70 FORB
LOCATION 70 GRASS
LOCATION 70 SHRUB
LOCATION 71 FORB
LOCATION 71 GRASS
LOCATION 71 SHRUB
LOCATION 72 FORB
LOCATION 72 GRASS
LOCATION 72 SHRUB
LOCATION 73 FORB
LOCATION 73 GRASS
LOCATION 73 SHRUB
LOCATION 74 FORB
LOCATION 74 GRASS
Percent Solids
93.0%
96.5%
94.5%
94.5%
95.5%
93.0%
93.8%
94.4%
95.5%
94.6%
95.2%
95.0%
93.2%
95.2%
95.0%
93.8%
95.2%
95.0%
94.0%
95.0%
95.0%
93.5%
95.5%
95.0%
95.0%
95.2%
93.8%
94.0%
95.0%
94.0%
93.5%
95.5%
92.5%
95.0%
96.0%
94.0%
94.0%
95.0%
94.0%
94.5%
96.5%
94.0%
95.0%
95.0%
93.5%
94.5%
96.0%
95.0%
96.0%
96.0%
94.0%
93.0%
94.5%
94.0%
94.5%
96.0%
Aluminum
52.2
34.7
28.2
44.7
37.9
31.7
33.6
35.4
74.3
42.8
23.0
58.6
78.3
31.0
31.0
43.2
223
41.7
44.4
55.6
41.7
35.6
44.1
44.4
33.0
29.2
55.0
30.3
29.2
29.1
35.2
25.9
28.3
20.4
36.9
63.5
68.6
58.3
48.6
70.8
54.0
39.6
20.3
33.5
24.3
51.2
39.7
44.5
16.0
94.2
31.9
43.6
42.6
28.3
35.6
38.7
Antimony
0.12
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
0.059
<0.048
0.18
<0.048
0.092
<0.048
<0.048
0.054
<0.048
<0.048
0.11
0.064
0.30
<0.048
0.15
0.089
0.101
0.42
0.17
0.19
<0.048
<0.048
0.20
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
0.074
0.059
<0.048
1.1
<0.048
0.078
<0.048
0.23
<0.048
0.096
0.24
<0.048
0.083
0.066
<0.048
0.10
0.060
0.051
0.11
0.23
<0.048
0.067
0.082
0.066
Arsenic
0.87
0.67
0.89
1.2
1.3
0.48
2.6
1.6
0.81
1.6
2.3
0.50
2.6
1.5
0.50
5.1
3.7
0.56
1.3
1.3
0.60
3.0
1.2
1.5
1.1
1.1
0.70
1.3
0.86
1.8
1.7
0.91
0.63
0.70
1.0
1.5
1.6
1.1
0.99
3.3
0.50
0.71
12.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.2
0.89
0.74
0.84
0.53
6.0
0.57
4.0
1.3
0.69
Cadmium
0.56
0.17
0.87
0.90
0.26
2.8
7.6
0.70
3.1
5.3
1.8
11.7
23.5
1.3
0.62
35.8
0.38
1.6
0.31
0.23
0.90
4.4
0.29
0.79
3.1
2.4
0.42
2.3
0.28
6.8
2.5
0.41
2.3
0.46
0.23
0.80
6.0
0.24
8.2
1.6
0.35
1.4
1.7
0.15
18.0
3.0
0.52
2.3
0.70
0.52
0.19
9.2
4.7
5.2
2.0
0.38
Lead
4.2
2.1
3.5
4.2
2.6
1.8
9.7
7.1
6.7
9.8
4.9
3.3
12.3
3.1
1.2
12.1
16.4
2.4
4.2
4.7
4.1
39.8
16.9
16.1
4.7
4.2
2.8
6.1
3.6
2.9
2.8
1.5
2.2
2.2
2.1
7.1
4.9
2.6
3.6
4.6
2.0
2.9
2.8
1.5
4.2
6.7
4.0
5.9
2.6
11.4
2.1
4.5
4.3
3.1
6.4
2.6
Mercury
<0.064
0.086
0.060
0.060
0.067
<0.064
0.071
0.072
<0.064
0.063
0.052
<0.064
0.062
0.056
<0.064
0.073
0.10
<0.064
<0.064
<0.064
<0.064
0.10
0.095
0.075
0.063
0.067
0.067
<0.032
0.043
0.062
0.087
0.13
<0.064
<0.064
<0.064
<0.064
0.11
<0.064
0.12
<0.064
0.12
<0.064
0.057
<0.064
0.059
<0.032
0.051
0.065
0.047
0.053
0.083
<0.064
<0.064
0.068
<0.064
<0.064
Selenium
0.96
0.36
1.3
2.1
1.1
0.88
11.0
2.8
1.2
1.5
1.6
0.65
10.5
1.6
0.50
23.0
1.2
1.2
1.7
0.32
0.43
0.43
0.23
0.40
1.7
1.4
0.25
6.9
1.7
5.2
5.9
0.77
2.5
0.84
0.44
0.51
1.3
0.61
1.2
0.92
0.14
0.41
35.5
2.0
8.2
1.6
0.77
0.83
2.6
1.6
0.87
18.7
9.8
12.6
10.7
4.3
Corresponding Soil ID
ISR0002WA1SS0302COMP
ISR0002WA1SS0302COMP
ISR0002WA1SS0302COMP
ISR0004WA1SS0302COMP
ISR0004WA1SS0302COMP
ISR0004WA1SS0302COMP
ISR0021WA3SS1101COMP
ISR0021WA3SS1101COMP
ISR0021WA3SS1101COMP
ISR0022WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0022WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0022WA3SS1 101 COMP
ISR0023WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0023WA3SS1 101 COMP
ISR0023WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0024WA3SS1 101 COMP
ISR0024WA3SS1 101 COMP
ISR0024WA3SS1 101 COMP
ISR0047WA5SS0302COMP
ISR0047WA5SS0302COMP
ISR0047WA5SS0302COMP
ISR0050WA5SS0302COMP
ISR0050WA5SS0302COMP
ISR0050WA5SS0302COMP
ISR0056WA6SS0102COMP
ISR0056WA6SS0102COMP
ISR0056WA6SS0102COMP
ISR0063WA6SED00020202
ISR0063WA6SED00020202
ISR0063WA6SED00020202
ISR0066WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0066WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0066WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0067WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0067WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0067WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0068WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0068WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0068WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0069WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0069WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0069WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0070WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0070WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0070WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0071WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0071WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0071WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0072WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0072WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0072WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0073WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0073WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0073WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0074WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0074WA7SS0302COMP
Date Collected
3/4/2002
3/4/2002
3/4/2002
3/4/2002
3/4/2002
3/4/2002
11/8/2001
11/8/2001
11/8/2001
11/21/2001
11/21/2001
11/21/2001
11/9/2001
11/9/2001
11/9/2001
11/27/2001
11/27/2001
11/27/2001
3/7/2002
3/7/2002
3/7/2002
3/8/2002
3/8/2002
3/8/2002
1/30/2002
1/30/2002
1/30/2002
2/1/2002
2/1/2002
2/1/2002
3/12/2002
3/12/2002
3/12/2002
3/13/2002
3/13/2002
3/13/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/27/2002
3/27/2002
3/27/2002
3/27/2002
3/27/2002
3/27/2002
3/28/2002
3/28/2002
3/28/2002
3/28/2002
3/28/2002
Aluminum
12700
12700
12700
9420
9420
9420
13000
13000
13000
11700
11700
11700
9100
9100
9100
9490
9490
9490
13800
13800
13800
15400
15400
15400
18000
18000
18000
6500
6500
6500
9670
9670
9670
12100
12100
12100
6500
6500
6500
6570
6570
6570
15800
15800
15800
6370
6370
6370
6060
6060
6060
6740
6740
6740
7700
7700
Antimony
4.7
4.7
4.7
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.3
6.3
6.3
5.7
5.7
5.7
19
19
19
3.2
3.2
3.2
13
13
13
4
4
4
10
10
10
5.4
5.4
5.4
0.9
0.9
0.9
7.8
7.8
7.8
0.81
0.81
0.81
0.8
0.8
0.8
3.5
3.5
3.5
8.9
8.9
8.9
8.2
8.2
8.2
1.4
1.4
1.4
7.2
7.2
Arsenic
71
71
71
84
84
84
93
93
93
110
110
110
190
190
190
68
68
68
290
290
290
210
210
210
200
200
200
74
74
74
26
26
26
98
98
98
16
16
16
19
19
19
190
190
190
170
170
170
110
110
110
25
25
25
120
120
Cadmium
19
19
19
19
19
19
6.1
6.1
6.1
21
21
21
22
22
22
5.7
5.7
5.7
54
54
54
18
18
18
34
34
34
12
12
12
3.3
3.3
3.3
17
17
17
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
22
22
22
27
27
27
12
12
12
5.4
5.4
5.4
21
21
Lead
930
930
930
1400
1400
1400
1100
1100
1100
1200
1200
1200
2800
2800
2800
660
660
660
2600
2600
2600
930
930
930
2100
2100
2100
1500
1500
1500
180
180
180
1400
1400
1400
120
120
120
130
130
130
1400
1400
1400
2500
2500
2500
1300
1300
1300
190
190
190
1100
1100
Mercury
0.806
0.806
0.806
1.27
1.27
1.27
0.76
0.76
0.76
0.94
0.94
0.94
2.1
2.1
2.1
0.24
0.24
0.24
21
21
21
0.91
0.91
0.91
2.35
2.35
2.35
0.385
0.385
0.385
0.3
0.3
0.3
1
1
1
0.068
0.068
0.068
0.088
0.088
0.088
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.08
0.08
0.08
1.3
1.3
Selenium
0.73
0.73
0.73
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.8
1.8
1.8
3.6
3.6
3.6
0.64
0.64
0.64
5.8
5.8
5.8
1.1
1.1
1.1
3.2
3.2
3.2
1.6
1.6
1.6
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.87
0.87
0.87
<0.34
<0.34
<0.34
<0.34
<0.34
<0.34
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.7
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.6
A-2_Vegetation Sample Results.xls
6/10/2004, 1:47 PM
-------
Table A-2
Vegetation Data Summary
ISR Ecological Sampling
(Results given in ppm dry weight)
2 of 2
Field Data Vegetation Results
Field Data Surface Soil (0-2 inches) Results
Field Sample ID
LOCATION 74 SHRUB
LOCATION 96 FORB
LOCATION 96 GRASS
LOCATION 96 SHRUB
LOCATION 106 FORB
LOCATION 106 GRASS
LOCATION 106 SHRUB
LOCATION 113 FORB
LOCATION 113 GRASS
LOCATION 113 SHRUB
LOCATION 117 FORB
LOCATION 117 GRASS
LOCATION 117 SHRUB
LOCATION 120 FORB
LOCATION 120 GRASS
LOCATION 120 SHRUB
LOCATION 126 FORB
LOCATION 126 GRASS
LOCATION 126 SHRUB
LOCATION 133 FORB
LOCATION 133 GRASS
LOCATION 133 SHRUB
LOCATION 138 FORB
LOCATION 138 GRASS
LOCATION 138 SHRUB
Percent Solids
93.5%
94.0%
95.5%
94.5%
93.5%
95.5%
94.0%
95.5%
96.0%
93.5%
93.0%
95.0%
92.0%
93.0%
96.0%
96.0%
95.0%
94.5%
92.0%
93.5%
95.5%
94.5%
93.5%
96.0%
91.0%
Aluminum
41.8
58.0
78.2
64.4
44.0
64.8
58.3
25.2
39.9
66.6
64.3
38.5
59.5
86.5
59.5
65.9
35.2
41.3
31.4
34.2
61.8
51.4
59.7
40.1
47.8
Antimony
0.12
0.16
0.30
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
0.14
0.15
0.19
0.10
0.14
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
0.12
<0.048
<0.048
<0.048
0.14
<0.048
<0.048
Arsenic
0.62
5.4
4.6
1.4
0.74
0.89
0.94
1.5
1.4
1.6
4.1
2.4
3.4
0.65
0.71
1.0
1.3
0.78
0.75
0.39
0.64
0.95
1.4
0.86
1.1
Cadmium
4.7
3.7
1.2
1.7
1.7
0.25
2.9
1.3
0.48
0.88
1.3
1.2
2.1
0.32
0.43
1.8
0.49
0.68
0.91
0.19
0.09
1.2
2.9
0.079
2.4
Lead
4.3
27.9
35.4
5.2
2.5
2.7
4.7
3.5
5.0
6.1
13.8
11.6
14.8
2.6
2.8
4.5
2.3
2.8
3.2
1.8
2.4
5.4
4.6
2.5
4.2
Mercury
<0.064
0.053
0.100
<0.064
0.085
<0.064
0.068
0.077
0.11
0.098
0.063
0.051
0.071
0.067
0.083
0.058
<0.064
<0.064
<0.064
<0.064
0.055
0.043
0.12
<0.064
<0.064
Selenium
4.0
0.68
0.33
0.41
0.16
0.19
0.26
0.55
0.43
1.0
0.47
0.62
0.43
0.30
0.36
0.54
0.31
0.19
0.44
0.25
0.45
0.43
0.53
0.30
0.33
Corresponding Soil ID
ISR0074WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0096WA8SS0202
ISR0096WA8SS0202
ISR0096WA8SS0202
ISR0106WA8SS0202
ISR0106WA8SS0202
ISR0106WA8SS0202
ISR01 1 3WA9SS1 201 COMP
ISR01 1 3WA9SS1 201 COMP
ISR0113WA9SS1201COMP
ISR0117WA9SS1201COMP
ISR01 1 7WA9SS1 201 COMP
ISR01 1 7WA9SS1 201 COMP
ISR0120WA9SS0102COMP
ISR0120WA9SS0102COMP
ISR0120WA9SS0102COMP
ISR0126WA9SS0102COMP
ISR0126WA9SS0102COMP
ISR0126WA9SS0102COMP
ISR0133WA9SED00020102
ISR0133WA9SED00020102
ISR0133WA9SED00020102
ISR0138WA8SS0202
ISR0138WA8SS0202
ISR0138WA8SS0202
Date Collected
3/28/2002
2/14/2002
2/14/2002
2/14/2002
2/15/2002
2/15/2002
2/15/2002
12/7/2001
12/7/2001
12/7/2001
12/6/2001
12/6/2001
12/6/2001
1/16/2002
1/16/2002
1/16/2002
1/11/2002
1/11/2002
1/11/2002
1/15/2002
1/15/2002
1/15/2002
2/20/2002
2/20/2002
2/20/2002
Aluminum
7700
3220
3220
3220
8950
8950
8950
8500
8500
8500
5870
5870
5870
5800
5800
5800
14000
14000
14000
6600
6600
6600
3250
3250
3250
Antimony
7.2
<0.28
<0.28
<0.28
0.8
0.8
0.8
5.9
5.9
5.9
6.94
6.94
6.94
1.5
1.5
1.5
4
4
4
1.8
1.8
1.8
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
Arsenic
120
270
270
270
32
32
32
110
110
110
303
303
303
25
25
25
88
88
88
78
78
78
15
15
15
Cadmium
21
15
15
15
2.2
2.2
2.2
10
10
10
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.1
1.1
1.1
9
9
9
2
2
2
1.1
1.1
1.1
Lead
1100
2100
2100
2100
290
290
290
1400
1400
1400
1280
1280
1280
170
170
170
690
690
690
410
410
410
94
94
94
Mercury
1.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.0425
0.0425
0.0425
0.97
0.97
0.97
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.72
0.72
0.72
<0.042
<0.042
<0.042
<0.0241
<0.0241
<0.0241
Selenium
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
<0.38
<0.38
<0.38
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.99
1.99
1.99
<0.36
<0.36
<0.36
0.87
0.87
0.87
0.41
0.41
0.41
<0.35
<0.35
<0.35
Field sample results as originally provided in the Eco-Risk Sampling Data Summary Report (AECI 2003b) and subsequently revised in AECI (2004c).
A-2_Vegetation Sample Results.xls
6/10/2004, 1:47 PM
-------
Table A-3
Invertebrate Data Summary
ISR Ecological Sampling
(Results given in ppm dry weight)
1 of 1
Field Data Terrestrial Invertebrate Results
Field Data Surface Soil (0-2 inches) Results)
Field Sample ID
LOCATION 21 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 22 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 23 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 24 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 47 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 56 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 63 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 66 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 68 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 69 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 70 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 71 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 72 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 73 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 74 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 96 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 106 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 113 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 120 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 126 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 133 INVERTEBRATE
LOCATION 138 INVERTEBRATE
Percent Solids
35.5%
35.4%
34.1%
35.9%
42.3%
37.3%
37.0%
39.9%
41 .6%
38.8%
52.2%
37.4%
35.0%
42.8%
40.4%
40.2%
40.9%
37.2%
39.3%
44.5%
37.4%
40.6%
Aluminum
132
128
144
82
76
141
113
237
84
89.7
81.1
40
236
201
126
71
80
153
163
54
146
101
Antimony
0.30
0.24
0.4
0.31
<0.032
0.034
0.30
<0.038
<0.037
0.11
0.030
0.11
0.28
<0.029
0.22
0.17
0.09
0.25
0.07
0.06
0.10
0.10
Arsenic
1.6
2.7
2.8
2.7
11.9
1.9
2.7
9.7
2.1
1.7
1.9
7.7
5.5
3.2
2.7
3.2
2.1
3.3
1.1
2.6
1.9
2.4
Cadmium
4.1
2.6
8.1
4.7
6.1
2.7
4.1
1.4
15.8
3.5
6.2
4.4
2.7
3.9
6.5
4.9
3.1
3.1
1.7
4.0
1.8
3.7
Lead
10.8
13.9
24.4
22.2
16.4
15.7
23.7
22.0
3.2
5.8
3.6
6.0
42.5
24.3
16.0
7.7
4.4
19.3
3.1
2.6
7.2
6.3
Selenium
4.8
3.3
10.9
6.4
3.8
2.7
12.0
1.1
9.3
3.3
6.2
8.8
4.8
9.1
4.6
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.6
2.1
Corresponding Soil ID
ISR0021 WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0022WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0023WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0024WA3SS1 1 01 COMP
ISR0047WA5SS0302COMP
ISR0056WA6SS01 02COMP
ISR0063WA6SED00020202
ISR0066WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0068WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0069WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0070WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0071 WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0072WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0073WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0074WA7SS0302COMP
ISR0096WA8SS0202
ISR0106WA8SS0202
ISR01 1 3WA9SS1 201 COMP
ISR01 20WA9SS01 02COMP
ISR01 26WA9SS01 02COMP
ISR01 33WA9SED000201 02
ISR0138WA8SS0202
Date Collected
11/8/2001
11/21/2001
11/9/2001
11/27/2001
3/7/2002
1/30/2002
2/1/2002
3/12/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/20/2002
3/27/2002
3/27/2002
3/28/2002
3/28/2002
2/14/2002
2/15/2002
12/7/2001
1/16/2002
1/11/2002
1/15/2002
2/20/2002
Aluminum
13000
11700
9100
9490
13800
18000
6500
9670
6500
6570
15800
6370
6060
6740
7700
3220
8950
8500
5800
14000
6600
3250
Antimony
6.3
5.7
19
3.2
13
10
5.4
0.9
0.81
0.8
3.5
8.9
8.2
1.4
7.2
<0.28
0.8
5.9
1.5
4
1.8
<0.26
Arsenic
93
110
190
68
290
200
74
26
16
19
190
170
110
25
120
270
32
110
25
88
78
15
Cadmium
6.1
21
22
5.7
54
34
12
3.3
1.6
1.8
22
27
12
5.4
21
15
2.2
10
1.1
9
2
1.1
Lead
1100
1200
2800
660
2600
2100
1500
180
120
130
1400
2500
1300
190
1100
2100
290
1400
170
690
410
94
Mercury
0.76
0.94
2.1
0.24
21
2.35
0.385
0.3
0.068
0.088
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.08
1.3
0.4
0.0425
0.97
0.087
0.72
<0.042
<0.0241
Selenium
1.4
1.8
3.6
0.64
5.8
3.2
1.6
0.47
<0.34
<0.34
2.9
2.7
1.4
1.8
1.6
1.8
<0.38
1.1
<0.36
0.87
0.41
<0.35
NOTE: Analysis for Mercury was not performed due to insufficient sample.
Field sample results as originally provided in the Eco-Risk Sampling Data Summary Report (AECI 2003b) and subsequently revised in AECI (2004d).
A-3_Terr Invertebrate Sample Results.xls
6/10/2004, 1:47 PM
-------
APPENDIX B
Summary Statistics for Environmental Media by Work Area
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
B-l Surface Water
B-2 Sediment
B-3 Non-AOC Surface Soil
B-4 AOC Surface Soil
B-5 Terrestrial Plant Tissue
B-6 Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue
B_CoverPage.xls
-------
APPENIDXB-1: Surface Water
Fraction
T3
u
O
%
3
fD
Total Recoverab
Water Quality
Parameters
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Acidity
Alkalinity
Chloride
Nitrate
Nitrite
Sulfate
TDS
TSS
Units
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Work Area 7; Pine Creek
(4 samples from each of 7 stations)
Sampling Dates: Dec 2001 - Sept 2002
Detection
Frequency
7/28
13/28
18/28
28/28
1/28
6/28
28/28
3/28
7/28
7/28
17/28
7/28
28/28
23/28
0/28
9/28
28/28
10/28
0/28
28/28
8/28
5/28
11/28
24/28
18/28
25/28
28/28
4/28
9/28
28/28
8/28
8/28
16/28
25/28
23/28
28/28
28/28
1/28
9/28
28/28
14/28
0/28
28/28
7/28
6/28
21/28
0/28
28/28
28/28
28/28
1/28
28/28
28/28
18/28
Avg
19
1.3
3.2
65
0.22
0.23
55,654
1.9
4.6
3.7
168
0.87
29,629
1.9
0.028
9.2
1,163
2.0
1.8
13,821
1.1
3.9
4.5
842
1.9
5.1
74
0.28
0.33
59,804
2.4
4.9
10
734
15
31,886
60
0.031
10
1,702
2.3
1.8
14,082
1.0
4.3
31
2.6
193
13
0.7
0.006
75
327
59
Stdev
10
0.72
2.4
20
0.15
0.13
2,783
1.4
4.2
1.0
216
0.29
2,548
1.1
0.008
5.0
285
1.0
1.0
1,829
0.92
2.1
2.4
773
1.2
3.0
24
0.31
0.23
4,334
1.3
4.0
6.7
679
16
2,898
69
0.015
5.8
779
1.2
1.0
1,737
0.47
1.6
28
1.4
14
4.3
0.4
0.017
12
20
94
Min
0.63
0.42
1.0
21
0.17
0.033
49,100
0.12
0.18
1.1
11
0.21
23,600
0.41
0.023
5.2
499
0.21
0.07
11,800
0.088
0.059
1.6
2.0
0.17
1.0
21
0.17
0.033
50,100
0.12
0.16
1.1
11
0.14
24,400
1.7
0.023
5.2
499
0.21
0.07
11,900
0.074
0.059
1.6
1.8
170
8.9
0.02
0.0008
58
280
2.2
Max
41
3.2
8.7
93
0.99
0.62
61,400
6.8
11
4.2
554
1.4
35,000
5.3
0.042
17
1,640
4.1
2.6
20,500
4.9
5.4
12
2,620
4.8
13
105
1.8
1.0
67,500
5.9
11
24
2,300
61
36,800
260
0.096
22
3,470
4.6
2.6
20,800
1.6
5.4
91
5.0
230
21
1.3
0.094
100
370
360
Work Area 3/4; Run-Off Ponds
( 1 sample from each of 5 ponds)
Sampling Date: Mar 2002
Detection
Frequency
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
0/5
5/5
5/5
3/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
4/5
5/5
5/5
4/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
3/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
5/5
2/5
5/5
5/5
3/5
2/5
5/5
5/5
3/5
Avg
508
6.2
39
30
0.24
11
9,942
0.37
0.66
24
430
36
1,772
97
0.17
2.1
2,580
4.4
0.54
1,824
0.25
1.0
105
4,460
6.5
78
73
0.72
19
10,660
3.1
1.7
84
3,340
306
2,620
193
1.1
5.7
5,194
4.5
1.7
1,698
0.85
5.4
317
4.0
24
2.0
0.2
0.006
17
162
11
Stdev
512
4.1
42
13
0.0
16
8,646
0.36
0.99
10
497
44
1,129
181
0.080
1.0
826
4.9
0.13
157
0.22
1.0
166
2,955
3.6
64
42
0.16
23
8,531
2.1
1.5
41
2,079
166
1,230
249
0.87
3.4
2,564
4.8
0.53
190
0.53
3.6
381
3.0
13
0.5
0.3
0.004
10
94
11
Min
200
2.4
5.5
21
0.24
0.72
4,100
0.12
0.086
14
130
4.3
860
5.0
0.057
1.2
1,510
0.21
0.39
1,690
0.034
0.19
14
1,500
2.5
12
32
0.53
1.1
4,260
0.91
0.28
22
1,200
61
1,200
15
0.094
2.1
2,190
0.21
0.92
1,520
0.27
1.6
57
1.8
3.9
1.4
0.0
0.0030
8.6
72
2.2
Max
1,400
13
110
52
0.24
39
25,100
1.0
2.4
35
1,300
110
3,700
420
0.27
3.7
3,770
12
0.73
2,000
0.59
2.7
400
8,900
12
180
140
0.86
58
25,600
6.0
4.1
120
6,300
480
4,200
630
2.5
11
8,660
12
2.4
1,950
1.7
10
990
7.5
39
2.6
0.7
0.012
34
270
29
Summary statistics evaluate non-detects at 1/2 the detection limit.
Data Stats_SW.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX B-2: Sediment
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
PH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 7; Pine Creek
(13 locations; 0-2" & 2-6" at all but one location)
Sampling Date Range: Nov 2001 - Sept 2002
Detection
Frequency
25/25
22/25
25/25
25/25
23/25
25/25
25/25
25/25
24/25
25/25
25/25
25/25
25/25
25/25
17/25
25/25
25/25
17/25
18/25
25/25
3/25
25/25
25/25
25/25
N Sampling
Locations f
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Avg
5,399
1.4
24
59
0.29
3.5
19,527
8.8
3.9
146
7,343
231
7,307
281
0.17
8.2
1,355
0.93
0.87
88
0.48
10
240
7.6
Stdev
4,225
1.3
19
39
0.22
4.2
16,981
4.1
2.6
123
3,998
283
2,680
113
0.25
4.7
1,116
1.2
0.66
57
0.24
6.0
199
0.35
Min
1,280
0.13
5.3
12
0.041
0.33
5,660
4.0
0.74
30
2,600
18
3,105
118
0.012
2.8
272
0.16
0.26
30
0.27
3.2
41
7.0
Max
17,350
4.4
79
176
0.88
16
73,200
20
12
513
18,550
966
11,000
581
0.78
21
4,330
4.8
2.4
249
1.2
26
804
8.2
Work Area 3/4; Run-off Ponds }
(1 location in each of 5 ponds; 0-2" & 2-6" at each location)
Sampling Date: Mar 2002
Detection
Frequency
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
9/10
10/10
10/10
6/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
N Sampling
Locations f
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Avg
17,250
6.7
229
147
0.8
17
2,766
18
10
354
18,350
1,919
3,781
520
2.1
16
3,511
3.4
6.2
119
1.9
28
608
6.0
Stdev
8,261
6.0
181
48
0.4
13
1,835
8.6
3.3
259
6,294
1,814
2,068
137
1.8
6.7
1,645
2.9
6.1
40
1.5
10
501
0.79
Min
8,400
1.1
32
88
0.4
4.0
1,550
9.0
5.3
69
10,500
230
2,000
405
0.19
10
1,750
0.25
1.0
68
0.30
13
170
5.0
Max
30,850
16
485
223
1.5
37
5,980
32
15
630
26,750
4,500
7,355
710
4.5
28
6,205
6.4
16
174
3.6
42
1,200
7.0
f At each sampling location, the two depth intervals (0-2" and 2-6") were averaged to represent the sampling location.
Non-detects were evaluated at 1/2 the detection limit prior to averaging across samples.
J For the run-off ponds several soil sampling locations were used to represent pond sediment samples.
Stations included: ISR0030, ISR0031, ISR0036, ISR0145, ISR0147 (AECI, 2003 personal communication).
Data Stats_Sed.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX B-3: Non-AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
pH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 1
Detection
Frequency
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
13/16
14/16
16/16
7/16
16/16
16/16
16/16
N Sampling
Locations f
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Avg
11,313
4.3
88
147
0.55
16.4
5,521
14.3
8.7
213
12,980
1,041
3,494
521
0.92
13.0
3,101
1.28
2.55
104
1.04
22
484
6.5
Stdev
4,122
3.3
65
44
0.18
9.1
3,973
3.9
3.2
147
3,620
726
980
149
0.65
3.5
1,115
1.0
1.67
36
0.74
6.7
281
0.73
Min
3,725
0.51
20.0
67
0.216
2.00
2,130
6.4
3.11
17
5,995
100
1,272
203
0.037
5.9
823
0.16
0.22
30
0.29
9.9
61
5.3
Max
18,000
11.0
270
220
0.81
34
13,550
20
15
551
16,700
2,800
4,810
743
2.20
17
4,540
4.1
6.2
151
2.2
32
1,150
7.8
Work Area 2
Detection
Frequency
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
2/7
6/7
7/7
5/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
N Sampling
Locations f
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Avg
21,225
2.6
47
143
0.9
14
2,975
21
13
111
17,575
489
4,131
547
0.5
17
4,354
0.5
1.5
112
0.9
35
285
7.0
Stdev
9,558
1.6
15
19
0.3
10
737
6.7
2.5
42
4,974
297
1,678
37
0.3
3.3
1,835
0.5
0.9
29
0.6
10
164
0.40
Min
12,750
1.1
30
119
0.6
6.0
2,045
15.1
9.9
59
12,550
225
2,845
512
0.28
13
2,935
0.17
0.6
84
0.10
23
132
6.6
Max
34,950
4
65
164
1.4
23
3,780
31
16
158
24,450
815
6,600
588
0.8
21
7,050
1.3
3
152
1.5
48
456
7.5
f For sampling locations with results for both the 0-2" and 2-6" depth interval, results were averaged to represent the sampling location.
Non-detects were evaluated at 1/2 the detection limit prior to averaging across samples.
Data Stats_Soil Non-AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 5
-------
APPENDIX B-3: Non-AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
pH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 3
Detection
Frequency
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
39/49
43/49
49/49
19/49
49/49
49/49
49/49
N Sampling
Locations f
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
Avg
13,424
8.5
180
126
0.6
17
2,532
14
10
285
16,160
1,602
2,912
462
1.6
14
2,734
2.6
4.8
97
1.1
26
545
6.1
Stdev
4,105
14.7
276
33
0.2
21
2,101
3.6
3.2
396
6,744
2,746
757
144
2.6
3.6
759
4.0
8.6
40
1.1
6
756
0.88
Min
8,400
0.9
24
83
0.4
3.2
1,054
9.0
5.3
49
10,500
135
2,000
235
0.15
9
1,750
0.17
0.3
58
0.30
13
91
4.4
Max
25,450
76
1,380
217
1.1
102
11,880
25
22
1,930
44,400
13,800
5,420
917
12.9
27
5,175
19.0
43
258
3.6
45
3,720
7.5
Work Area 4
Detection
Frequency
63/63
56/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
51/63
54/63
63/63
41/63
63/63
63/63
63/63
N Sampling
Locations f
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
Avg
13,434
8.9
358
324
0.8
18
2,871
16
10
319
19,244
1,777
3,238
664
2.0
15
3,008
2.9
9.4
114
1.6
24
578
6.1
Stdev
5,872
13.2
550
446
0.3
17
1,206
5.4
2.7
382
8,285
2,103
1,412
448
4.1
5.2
1,237
3.0
17.9
41
1.7
7
572
0.54
Min
5,400
0.1
17
61
0.3
1.3
1,104
7.5
4.8
30
7,700
71
1,200
277
0.05
7
1,300
0.09
0.2
50
0.09
10
72
4.7
Max
30,850
59
3,090
2,315
1.5
75
5,980
32
15
2,105
41,400
7,680
7,355
2,715
23.4
28
6,205
11.2
94
197
6.2
42
2,610
7.3
Data Stats_Soil Non-AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 2 of 5
-------
APPENDIX B-3: Non-AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
pH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 5
Detection
Frequency
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
8/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
N Sampling
Locations f
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Avg
15,856
9.9
235
221
0.7
23
5,226
19
14
478
19,311
1,777
3,716
906
3.5
15
4,350
3.1
4.0
180
2.0
30
1,244
6.2
Stdev
2,159
10.7
153
65
0.1
17
4,390
1.9
3.9
334
7,889
1,641
339
415
6.6
3.1
633
3.7
3.4
59
1.5
5
2,618
0.27
Min
12,000
2.5
96
140
0.6
8.8
2,890
16.1
9.8
208
14,900
500
3,350
430
0.61
11
3,310
0.72
1.5
137
0.35
23
216
5.8
Max
18,900
37
600
348
0.8
54
16,400
22
20
1,080
39,800
5,500
4,390
1,680
21.0
19
5,380
12.0
12
329
5.1
38
8,210
6.6
Work Area 6
Detection
Frequency
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
18/23
20/23
23/23
6/23
23/23
23/23
23/23
N Sampling
Locations f
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Avg
10,573
4.6
80
104
0.6
12
3,255
12
8
174
11,604
991
2,723
405
0.8
12
2,397
1.5
2.4
62
0.7
20
292
6.7
Stdev
4,543
4.3
59
41
0.2
10
2,312
4.3
3.1
150
3,992
1,131
1,176
133
0.8
3.6
1,090
2.0
2.8
29
0.9
7
240
0.62
Min
3,050
0.7
16
32
0.2
1.3
660
4.2
2.9
23
4,000
98
775
220
0.10
5
740
0.09
0.2
14
0.09
6
85
5.5
Max
20,500
14
195
175
1.0
29
9,150
21
15
550
19,500
3,800
4,690
725
3.0
18
4,900
6.3
10
115
3.2
35
850
7.8
Data Stats_Soil Non-AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 3 of 5
-------
APPENDIX B-3: Non-AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
pH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 7
Detection
Frequency
78/78
76/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
77/78
78/78
78/78
71/78
71/78
78/78
70/78
78/78
78/78
78/78
N Sampling
Locations f
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
Avg
12,670
3.2
95
135
0.8
12
15,897
17
11
1,063
18,148
691
7,468
737
0.6
19
3,044
1.7
2.7
107
1.5
20
1,152
7.3
Stdev
8,342
2.6
81
65
0.5
10
11,358
10.2
11.5
2,040
14,316
671
4,794
710
0.6
17.4
1,899
1.3
2.1
59
0.9
10
1,232
0.66
Min
2,960
0.2
9
38
0.2
0.5
820
6.8
3.0
11
5,380
39
1,208
183
0.01
6
714
0.09
0.2
37
0.09
7
43
5.3
Max
30,950
10
352
282
2.2
50
43,450
48
57
7,485
70,150
2,826
17,950
4,600
2.3
77
7,880
5.4
8
405
3.4
41
5,420
8.6
Work Area 8/Work Area 11
Detection
Frequency
64/64
41/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
48/64
64/64
64/64
8/64
41/64
64/64
16/64
64/64
64/64
64/64
N Sampling
Locations f
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
Avg
8,211
0.9
50
105
0.4
2
10,261
11
6
76
14,599
249
2,943
504
0.1
10
1,892
0.3
1.3
57
0.6
16
198
7.4
Stdev
5,619
1.1
70
65
0.3
3
20,985
5.4
4.4
173
21,071
339
1,083
380
0.3
4.1
1,324
0.4
1.6
31
0.6
9
238
0.58
Min
2,370
0.1
10
25
0.1
0.4
1,070
4.6
2.2
8
3,845
35
961
162
0.01
5
294
0.09
0.2
18
0.10
5
36
5.7
Max
19,600
5
311
255
0.9
14
124,000
22
22
937
126,000
1,440
5,065
1,940
1.5
19
4,795
2.1
7
126
3.5
33
946
8.1
Data Stats_Soil Non-AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 4 of 5
-------
APPENDIX B-3: Non-AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
pH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 9
Detection
Frequency
30/30
30/30
30/30
30/30
28/30
30/30
30/30
30/30
27/30
30/30
30/30
30/30
30/30
30/30
25/30
28/30
30/30
16/30
19/30
30/30
9/30
30/30
30/30
30/30
N Sampling
Locations f
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
Avg
7,437
2.7
86
134
0.3
o
5
4,513
9
6
84
11,264
468
2,261
309
0.2
8
1,896
0.6
2.0
74
0.6
14
188
6.4
Stdev
4,358
2.1
105
115
0.2
o
5
5,307
3.9
3.1
62
5,843
439
993
165
0.2
3.6
1,131
0.6
2.0
32
0.5
7
145
1.12
Min
1,070
0.3
9
20
0.0
0.3
730
2.5
1.0
6
2,420
40
1,000
110
0.01
2
212
0.14
0.3
11
0.27
4
28
4.0
Max
20,000
8
452
500
1.0
10
24,450
19
12
240
24,700
1,530
4,700
600
1.0
15
5,000
2.2
7
146
2.1
32
680
8.2
Work Area 10
Detection
Frequency
68/68
64/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
66/68
68/68
68/68
52/68
63/68
68/68
32/68
68/68
68/68
68/68
N Sampling
Locations f
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
Avg
9,963
2.8
76
134
0.5
7
6,630
12
7
154
12,741
580
3,395
461
0.4
12
2,908
0.8
1.9
108
0.5
16
424
6.8
Stdev
3,707
2.5
52
45
0.2
4
5,123
4.1
2.5
98
4,166
445
1,571
168
0.3
4.3
1,170
0.5
1.5
53
0.3
5
270
0.74
Min
4,400
0.2
20
58
0.2
1.5
1,020
5.9
3.4
34
5,600
130
1,200
175
0.08
5
1,200
0.15
0.2
45
0.23
9
83
3.9
Max
18,000
12
200
230
0.9
20
22,640
20
13
410
23,200
1,990
6,700
843
1.2
20
5,275
2.1
7
306
1.6
29
1,170
7.4
Data Stats_Soil Non-AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 5 of 5
-------
APPENDIX B-4: AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
PH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 1
Detection
Frequency
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
Avg
4,250
15.2
929
366
0.22
3.8
37,400
13.3
2.1
365
51,300
5,280
2,240
903
0.39
4.5
1,720
2.22
28.50
142
5.42
13
999
4.0
Stdev
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Min
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Max
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Work Area 2
Detection
Frequency
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
0/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
Avg
6,490
466
7,960
264
0.3
2,340
58,200
59
0.26
96,200
23,400
58,100
13,300
964
8.3
106
847
715.0
165.0
743
13.1
16
25,100
7.4
Stdev
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Min
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Max
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Work Area 3
Detection
Frequency
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
28/31
31/31
31/31
18/31
31/31
31/31
31/31
Avg
11,657
52
1,448
169
0.6
848
3,384
15
10
850
21,271
6,393
2,960
530
62.8
13
2,656
34.0
18.4
125
5.9
25
1,651
5.7
Stdev
3,502
139.9
4,945
104
0.2
4,483
3,645
4.0
3.2
1,175
12,282
11,185
1,040
255
304.3
4.4
796
96.6
32.7
71
10.9
7
2,776
1.29
Min
5,600
0.6
19
42
0.2
0.9
640
6.3
3.4
37
6,480
160
1,230
98
0.08
6
1,010
0.15
0.5
35
0.28
8
87
2.4
Max
18,200
760
27,700
613
0.9
25,000
18,100
28
17
5,200
70,800
45,800
7,220
1,280
1,700.0
23
3,960
500.0
145
380
44.0
36
12,300
7.8
Note: AOCs were not evaluated for Work Area 10 (residential areas).
Summary statistics evaluate non-detects at 1/2 the detection limit.
Data Stats_Soil AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX B-4: AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
PH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 4
Detection
Frequency
15/15
14/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
13/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
14/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
14/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
Avg
7,213
59.9
2,255
741
0.3
10
8,380
16
5
450
34,493
6,157
2,036
279
3.0
7
2,213
8.3
30.2
186
6.9
23
917
4.3
Stdev
4,137
75.6
3,017
916
0.2
9
14,103
13.5
2.9
307
16,606
6,913
846
168
3.6
3.8
723
5.8
33.0
97
13.0
10
1,246
0.80
Min
2,180
0.1
72
69
0.1
0.01
975
6.2
0.7
60
14,800
161
693
59
0.01
2
977
0.33
1.4
84
0.28
13
26
3.0
Max
14,100
230
9,770
2,980
0.7
27
53,300
60
10
1,300
72,500
22,000
3,210
617
14.6
14
3,530
18.0
104
379
53.0
53
4,640
6.0
Work Area 5
Detection
Frequency
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
Avg
3,140
46.3
759
187
0.1
5
3,030
3
5
511
66,200
7,280
542
43
5.1
4
3,070
16.8
57.8
739
1.9
10
884
2.1
Stdev
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Min
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Max
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Work Area 6
Detection
Frequency
10/10
9/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
7/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
Avg
10,021
21.9
533
448
0.5
20
20,828
14
11
786
52,240
5,011
2,852
917
4.5
11
2,504
5.6
17.2
134
4.6
22
1,162
4.9
Stdev
5,091
35.2
558
657
0.2
19
32,166
4.1
6.2
718
48,994
7,176
768
699
8.0
3.5
1,199
8.4
24.4
87
4.4
7
1,058
1.18
Min
3,370
0.1
190
125
0.2
1.3
1,160
6.7
2.2
197
13,400
1,200
1,530
157
0.48
5
291
0.71
4.3
50
0.29
14
358
2.6
Max
19,500
120
2,080
2,290
0.9
64
99,400
21
22
2,620
154,000
25,200
3,840
2,280
26.9
17
4,550
29.0
86
319
13.0
35
3,120
6.8
Data Stats_Soil AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX B-4: AOC Surface Soil
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
PH
Units
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
std
Work Area 7
Detection
Frequency
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
1/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
Avg
7,655
4.4
127
134
0.3
9
6,080
8
5
324
23,850
1,418
1,920
268
1.1
5
2,420
1.9
5.7
181
0.8
15
853
4.1
Stdev
5,438
3.5
72
87
0.3
13
4,794
5.3
4.5
23
14,496
767
1,287
333
1.3
3.7
891
0.2
0.3
39
0.2
6
1,156
2.55
Min
3,810
1.9
77
72
0.1
0.01
2,690
4.4
1.5
307
13,600
875
1,010
32
0.15
3
1,790
1.71
5.5
153
0.63
10
35
2.3
Max
11,500
7
178
195
0.5
19
9,470
12
8
340
34,100
1,960
2,830
504
2.0
8
3,050
2.0
6
208
0.9
19
1,670
5.9
Work Area 8/Work Area 1 1
Detection
Frequency
14/14
11/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
13/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
8/14
14/14
14/14
11/14
14/14
14/14
14/14
Avg
5,264
4.9
277
143
0.3
6
26,467
10
7
435
46,739
1,623
2,281
1,838
0.4
7
1,510
1.7
7.2
93
3.8
13
652
5.3
Stdev
2,628
5.3
314
91
0.2
6
31,180
3.1
5.9
603
44,436
1,627
1,298
4,754
0.5
3.6
589
2.3
6.8
61
6.6
4
603
1.67
Min
2,230
0.1
33
20
0.1
0.2
741
3.7
0.3
20
7,420
74
997
136
0.03
3
873
0.15
0.4
36
0.28
8
55
2.7
Max
11,900
20
1,140
314
0.7
22
91,100
16
19
1,920
136,000
5,480
4,920
18,300
2.0
15
3,040
8.8
24
269
25.0
23
2,030
7.5
Work Area 9
Detection
Frequency
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
Avg
4,273
8.4
453
345
0.2
3
4,163
9
3
180
29,925
2,210
1,981
436
0.3
5
1,496
1.5
13.3
135
2.5
11
479
4.4
Stdev
1,504
1.7
156
53
0.1
2
1,720
2.1
0.8
27
5,025
749
761
238
0.1
1.0
478
0.3
2.3
35
0.6
2
179
0.75
Min
2,470
6.8
240
284
0.2
1.7
2,890
6.2
1.9
140
24,600
1,200
905
243
0.22
4
853
1.15
10.6
95
1.77
8
281
3.4
Max
6,080
11
598
411
0.4
5
6,700
11
4
199
35,600
3,000
2,670
766
0.4
6
1,940
1.8
15
181
3.3
13
713
5.0
Data Stats_Soil AOC.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX B-5: Terrestrial Plant Tissue (Shrubs, Forbs, and Grasses Combined)
Analyte
% Solids
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Units
%
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
Work Area 1
Detection
Frequency
6/6
6/6
2/6
6/6
6/6
6/6
4/6
6/6
Avg
95%
38.2
0.046
0.89
0.93
3.1
0.056
1.1
Stdev
1.4%
8.9
0.040
0.30
0.97
1.0
0.021
0.6
Min
93%
28.2
0.024
0.48
0.17
1.8
0.032
0.36
Max
97%
52.2
0.12
1.3
2.8
4.2
0.086
2.1
Work Area 3
Detection
Frequency
12/12
12/12
6/12
12/12
12/12
12/12
8/12
12/12
Avg
95%
59.7
0.078
1.94
7.78
7.4
0.056
4.7
Stdev
0.7%
54.3
0.084
1.40
11.07
4.7
0.022
6.8
Min
93%
23.0
0.024
0.50
0.38
1.2
0.032
0.50
Max
96%
223.0
0.30
5.1
35.8
16.4
0.101
23.0
Work Area 5
Detection
Frequency
6/6
6/6
6/6
6/6
6/6
6/6
3/6
6/6
Avg
95%
44.3
0.184
1.47
1.15
14.3
0.061
0.6
Stdev
0.8%
6.5
0.119
0.81
1.60
13.8
0.033
0.5
Min
94%
35.6
0.089
0.60
0.23
4.1
0.032
0.23
Max
96%
55.6
0.42
3.0
4.4
39.8
0.101
1.7
Analyte
% Solids
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Units
%
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
Work Area 6
Detection
Frequency
6/6
6/6
1/6
6/6
6/6
6/6
5/6
6/6
Avg
95%
34.3
0.053
1.14
2.55
4.1
0.053
2.8
Stdev
0.6%
10.2
0.071
0.38
2.38
1.3
0.020
2.6
Min
94%
29.1
0.024
0.70
0.28
2.8
0.016
0.25
Max
95%
55.0
0.20
1.8
6.8
6.1
0.067
6.9
Work Area 7
Detection
Frequency
27/27
27/27
18/27
27/27
27/27
27/27
13/27
27/27
Avg
95%
42.1
0.114
1.77
2.87
3.9
0.054
4.8
Stdev
1.0%
17.7
0.199
2.39
3.92
2.2
0.032
7.7
Min
93%
16.0
0.024
0.50
0.15
1.5
0.016
0.14
Max
97%
94.2
1.06
12.1
18.0
11.4
0.125
35.5
Work Area 8/Work Area 11
Detection
Frequency
9/9
9/9
3/9
9/9
9/9
9/9
5/9
9/9
Avg
94%
57.3
0.083
1.92
1.87
10.0
0.061
0.4
Stdev
1.5%
11.8
0.098
1.77
1.23
12.5
0.033
0.2
Min
91%
40.1
0.024
0.74
0.08
2.5
0.032
0.16
Max
96%
78.2
0.30
5.4
3.7
35.4
0.118
0.7
Analyte
% Solids
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Units
%
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
Work Area 9
Detection
Frequency
15/15
15/15
6/15
15/15
15/15
15/15
11/15
15/15
Avg
94%
50.7
0.070
1.43
0.89
5.5
0.060
0.5
Stdev
1.4%
17.2
0.061
1.08
0.59
4.3
0.024
0.2
Min
92%
25.2
0.024
0.39
0.09
1.8
0.032
0.19
Max
96%
86.5
0.19
4.1
2.1
14.8
0.105
1.0
Summary statistics evaluate non-detects at 1/2 the detection limit.
Data Stats_Plants.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX B-6: Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue
Analyte
% Solids
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Selenium
Units
%
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
Work Area 3
Detection
Frequency
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
Avg
35%
121.3
0.298
2.45
4.91
17.8
6.3
Stdev
0.8%
27.1
0.045
0.58
2.33
6.5
3.3
Min
34%
81.8
0.239
1.59
2.64
10.8
3.30
Max
36%
143.4
0.35
2.8
8.1
24.4
10.9
Work Area 5
Detection
Frequency
1/1
1/1
0/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
Avg
42%
76.1
0.016
11.92
6.13
16.4
3.8
Stdev
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
Min
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
Max
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
Work Area 6
Detection
Frequency
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
Avg
37%
127.1
0.166
2.31
3.38
19.7
7.4
Stdev
0.2%
20.5
0.187
0.59
0.98
5.7
6.6
Min
37%
112.6
0.034
1.90
2.68
15.7
2.72
Max
37%
141.6
0.30
2.7
4.1
23.7
12.0
Analyte
% Solids
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Selenium
Units
%
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
mg/kg dw
Work Area 7
Detection
Frequency
8/8
8/8
5/8
8/8
8/8
8/0
to
8/0
to
Avg
41%
136.9
0.099
4.31
5.54
15.4
5.9
Stdev
5.1%
77.2
0.101
3.00
4.47
13.7
3.0
Min
35%
40.0
0.015
1.73
1.36
3.2
1.08
Max
52%
237.1
0.28
9.7
15.8
42.4
9.3
Work Area 8/Work Area 11
Detection
Frequency
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
Avg
41%
83.9
0.119
2.57
3.93
6.1
2.0
Stdev
0.4%
15.2
0.044
0.60
0.92
1.7
0.1
Min
40%
71.1
0.089
2.06
3.14
4.4
1.91
Max
41%
100.7
0.17
3.2
4.9
7.7
2.1
Work Area 9
Detection
Frequency
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
4/4
Avg
40%
129.0
0.119
2.20
2.64
8.0
1.6
Stdev
3.4%
50.6
0.089
0.95
1.11
7.8
0.2
Min
37%
53.8
0.060
1.06
1.67
2.5
1.41
Max
44%
162.8
0.25
3.3
4.0
19.3
1.8
Summary statistics evaluate non-detects at 1/2 the detection limit.
Data Stats_Inverts.xls: Summary Table
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX C
SELECTION OF TOXICITY BENCHMARKS
AND WILDLIFE TOXICITY REFERENCE VALUES
Overview
The hazard quotient approach to risk characterization is based on comparison of site-related
indices of exposure to appropriate benchmarks of toxicity. These benchmarks may be
concentration-based (e.g., the concentration in soil, sediment, surface water, or diet), or may be
dose-based. Each benchmark is contaminant-specific, receptor-specific and is usually medium-
specific.
For this Baseline ERA, all toxicity benchmarks are based on values developed by various
regulatory agencies and published in the literature. This appendix describes the various sources
of benchmark values reviewed for this risk assessment, and identifies the hierarchy used to
prioritize values when more than one value was available.
This appendix is organized into the following sections:
Aquatic Receptors (Fish & Benthic Macroinvertebrates)
C-l Benchmarks for Direct Contact With Surface Water
C-2 Benchmarks for Direct Contact with Sediment
Wildlife Receptors (Birds & Mammals)
C-3 Dose-Based Toxicity Reference Values
C-l
-------
Aquatic Receptors (Fish & Benthic Macroinvertebrates)
C-l Benchmarks for Direct Contact With Surface Water
Toxicity values for the protection aquatic life from contaminants in surface water are available
from several sources. Each of these sources is described briefly below.
National Ambient Water Quality Criteria
The USEPA has established acute and chronic National Ambient Water Quality Criteria
(NAWQC) values for surface waters for the protection of aquatic communities (USEPA
2002a). The acute NAWQC is intended to protect against short-term (48 to 96 hour)
lethality, while the chronic NAWQC is intended to protect against long-term effects on
growth, reproduction, and survival. The NAWQC values are not species-specific, but are
designed to protect 95% of the aquatic species for which toxicity data are available
(USEPA 1985).
Great Lake Water Quality Initiative Tier II Values
The approach used for the derivation of Great Lake Water Quality Initiative (GLWQI)
Tier II secondary acute values (SAVs) and secondary chronic values (SCVs) is similar to
that used to derive NAWQC. Data and detailed methods and are described in Appendix
B of Suter and Tsao (1996). In brief, a secondary acute value is derived by taking the
lowest genus mean acute value (GMAV) and dividing it by the Final Acute Value Factor
(FAVF). The FAVF is based on the number of studies and types of species used to
derive the FAV. Once an SAV is calculated, the geometric mean of each of the
secondary acute-chronic ratios (SACR) is found. The SCV is calculated by dividing the
SAV by the SACR.
USEPA Region 4 Screening Values
Screening level freshwater benchmarks for are also available from USEPA Region 4
(USEPA, 2002b). The Region 4 acute and chronic screening values are equal to the
lowest effect level (LEL) divided by 10 to protect for sensitive species. If no chronic
LEL is available, the chronic screening value is equal to the lowest acute LC50 or EC50
divided by 10.
Canadian Water Quality Guidelines
The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) have established water
quality guidelines (WQG) for the protection of aquatic life in Canadian waters (CCME,
1991, 2001). The protocol for deriving water quality guidelines is similar to the
NAWQC procedure. Protocol details are available on the CCME WQG website. In
brief, the guideline is equal to the most sensitive LOEL from a chronic exposure study
C-2
-------
divided by a safety factor of 10. If a chronic LOEL is not available, the WQG is equal to
the acute LC50 divided by the acute/chronic ratio (ACR). The CCME WQG is designed
to be protective of "100% of the aquatic life species, 100% of the time".
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Lowest Chronic Values andEC20 Values
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has compiled summary tables of the lowest
chronic values (LCVs) in surface water for fish, daphnids, non-daphnid invertebrates,
aquatic plants, and aquatic populations (Suter and Tsao, 1996). In some instances, the
LCVs were extrapolated from LC50 and EC50 data using fish and daphnid-specific
equations. ORNL also summarized EC20 data for fish, daphnids, sensitive species, and
aquatic populations. The EC20s are based on a level of biological effect and are intended
to be indices of population production (Suter and Tsao, 1996).
USEPA Region 5 Ecological Screening Levels
The USEPA Region 5 has derived ecological screening levels (ESLs) for RCRA
Appendix IX Hazardous Constituents in soil, surface water, sediment, and air (USEPA
1999). The surface water ESL is based on either an aquatic benchmark, which is
protective of direct contact exposures, or a wildlife receptor-specific benchmark, which is
protective of ingestion exposures in the mink and belted kingfisher. The surface water
ESL does not distinguish whether it is derived based on aquatic or wildlife exposure.
OSWER Ecotox Thresholds
The OSWER Ecotox Thresholds (ETs) were presented in a USEPA ECO Update Bulletin
(USEPA, 1996). The bulletin provided an overview of the development and use of
ecological benchmarks for surface water and sediment. For surface water, the ET is
based on either the chronic NAWQC or the GLWQI Tier II value.
Because the USEPA Region 5 ESLs do not make a distinction between surface water
benchmarks derived from aquatic data and wildlife data, these values are excluded from
consideration as a benchmark source. The OSWER ETs were also excluded because they are
based on primary sources (NAWQC, GLWQI Tier II) that had been previously reviewed. For
the remaining sources, selection of the surface water toxicity benchmarks for aquatic receptors
was based on the following hierarchy:
• National Ambient Water Quality Criteria
• Great Lake Water Quality Initiative Tier II Values
• USEPA Region 4 Screening Values
• Canadian Water Quality Guidelines
Oak Ridge National Laboratory LCVs and EC20s
C-
-------
The surface water benchmark values from these sources are shown in Table C-la, along with the
values selected for use in the risk assessment. For many metals and metalloids, the NAWQC
values are dependent on the hardness of the water, so the precise value of the acute and chronic
NAWQC that applies to a sample depends on the hardness of that sample. The equations and
parameters used to calculate the acute and chronic NAWQC values for these metals are
presented in Table C-lb.
References:
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 1991. Appendix IX- A Protocol for the
Derivation of Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. April 1991. In: Canadian
Water Quality Guidelines, CCME, 1987. Prepared by the Task Force on Water Quality Guidelines.
[Updated and reprinted with minor revisions and editorial changes in Canadian Environmental Quality
Guidelines, Chapter 4, CCME, 1999, Winnipeg.]
http://www.ec.gc.ca/ceqg-rcqe/English/Pdf/water_protocol-aquatic_life.htm
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2001. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines,
Summary Table - Updated. In: Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, 1999, CCME, Winnipeg.
http://www.ec.gc.ca/ceqg-rcqe/English/Pdf/water_summary _table-aquatic_life.htm
Suter II, GW and CL Tsao. 1996. Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Potential Contaminants of
Concern for Effects on Aquatic Biota: 1996 Revision. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Document #
ES/ER/TM-96/R2. June 1996.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1985. Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National
Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses. NTIS Document Number
PB85-227049. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1996. ECO Update: Ecotox Thresholds. Intermittent
Bulletin. Volume 3, Number 2, January 1996. EPA 540/F-95/038.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1999. Region 5 Ecological Screening Levels for RCRA
Appendix IXHazardous Constituents. Working Draft 1999. United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002a. National Recommended Water Quality
Criteria: 2002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Science and
Technology. November 2002. EPA-822-R-02-047.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002b. Region 4 Ecological Risk Assessment Bulletins
- Supplement to RAGS. Downloaded on July 15, 2002 from website:
http://www.epa.gov/region04/waste/ots/ecolbul.htm
C-4
-------
C-2 Benchmarks for Direct Contact with Sediment
Toxicity values for the protection benthic macroinvertebrates from contaminants in freshwater
sediment are available from several sources. Each of these sources is described briefly below.
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines
MacDonald et al. (2000) issued consensus-based sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) for
28 chemicals of concern, in an effort to focus on agreement among the various sediment
quality guidelines. For each chemical of concern, a threshold effect concentration (TEC)
and a probable effect concentration (PEC) were identified based on available sediment
toxicity literature. The consensus-based TECs were calculated by determining the
geometric mean of all threshold effect values from the literature. The consensus-based
PECs were calculated by determining the geometric mean of all probable effect values
from the literature. A summary of the types of sediment effect concentrations included in
the TEC and PEC calculations is provided in MacDonald et al. (2000).
The predictive reliability of these values were also evaluated. The predictive ability
analyses were focused on the ability of each SQG when applied alone to classify samples
as either toxic or non-toxic. Sediment toxicity should be observed only rarely below the
TEC and should be frequently observed above the PEC. Individual TECs were
considered reliable if more than 75% of the sediment samples were correctly predicted to
be non-toxic. Similarly, the individual PEC was considered reliable if greater than 75%
of the sediment samples were correctly predicted to be toxic. The SQGs were considered
to be reliable only if a minimum of 20 samples were included in the predictive ability
evaluation (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Because field collected sediments contain a mixture of chemicals, a second analysis was
completed to investigate whether the toxicity of a sediment could be predicted based on
the average of the PEC ratios for the sediment, using only the PEC values that were
found to be reliable. It was found that 92% of sediment samples with a mean PEC
quotient > 1.0 were toxic to one or more species of aquatic organisms. The mean PEC
quotient was found to be highly correlated with incidence of toxicity (R2 = 0.98)
(MacDonald et al. 2000).
ARCS Sediment Effect Concentrations
As part of the Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediment (ARCS) Project,
Ingersoll et al. (1996) compiled freshwater sediment toxicity data from nine different
sites in the United States and identified a series of sediment effect concentrations (SECs)
for a series of metals in sediment. The SECs are defined as the concentrations of
individual contaminants in sediment below which toxicity is rarely observed and above
which toxicity is frequently observed. The database was compiled to classify toxicity
data for Great Lakes sediment samples and is segregated into "effect" data and "no
C-5
-------
effect" data. Ingersoll et al.(1996) derived five different SECs; effect range low (ERL),
effect range median (ERM), threshold effect level (TEL), probable effect level (PEL) and
no effect concentration (NEC). The derivation of each of these SECs is presented below:
• effect range low (ERL) = 10* percentile of adverse effect data
effect range median (ERM) = 50th percentile (median) of adverse effect data
• no effect range median (NERM) = 5 0th percentile (median) of no effect data
no effect range high (NERH) = 85th percentile of no effect data
• threshold effect level (TEL) = geometric mean of ERL and NERM
• probable effect level (PEL) = geometric mean of ERM and NERH
• no effect concentration (NEC) = maximum of no effect data
The ERL is defined as the concentration below which adverse effects are unlikely to
occur. The ERM is defined as the concentration of a chemical above which effects are
frequently or always observed or predicted among most species. The NEC is the
maximum concentration of a chemical in sediment that does not significantly adversely
affect the particular response when compared to the control.
USEPA Region 5 Ecological Screening Levels
The USEPA Region 5 Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs) for sediment were developed
based on available federal freshwater sediment criteria and state-promulgated sediment
quality guidelines (USEPA 1999). If no freshwater guidelines were available, marine
criteria were used. For those chemicals for which no guidelines were available, an
interim ESL was developed using the equilibrium partitioning approach. These interim
guidelines were developed for both nonpolar and polar organic constituents. The
equilibrium partitioning method is generally only applied to nonpolar organics, however,
it was assumed to be a satisfactory method for organics for use on a screening level
approach (USEPA 1999). The ESL was derived from the lowest federal, state or interim
water quality guideline and assumes a total organic carbon content of 1%.
NOAA Sediment Effect Concentrations
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) compiled sediment data
from studies performed in both freshwater and saltwater (originally presented in NOS
OMA Technical Memo 52, Long and Morgan 1990).The NOAA ERL and ERM were
developed using the same procedures as outlined for the ARCS Project (Ingersoll et al.
1996). The NOAA ERL is defined as the concentration of a chemical in sediment below
which adverse effects are rarely observed or predicted among sensitive species. The
NOAA ERM is representative of concentrations above which effects frequently occur.
The original data set used by Long and Morgan (1990) has since been supplemented with
additional saltwater data, therefore these additional marine reports are not applicable (ie:
Longetal. 1995).
C-6
-------
USEPA Region 4 Screening Levels
The USEPA Region 4 Screening Levels are derived from three different sediment effects
data sets including NOAA freshwater and marine data from Long and Morgan (1990),
additional NOAA marine data from Long et al. (1995), and Florida State Department of
Environmental Protection marine data from MacDonald et al. (1996). The sediment
effect level is based on the reported ERL from each study. In instances when the USEPA
Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) practical quantitation limit (PQL) is above the effect
level, the screening value is equal to the CLP PQL (USEPA 2002).
CCME Sediment Quality Guidelines
The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) derived sediment
quality guidelines to support protection and management strategies for freshwater,
estuarine, and marine ecosystems (CCME 1995). Guideline derivation protocols are
detailed in CCME (1995) and are similar to the procedures described previously for the
ARCS Project (Ingersoll et al. 1996). Separate guidelines were derived for freshwater
and marine sediments (CCME 2001). The freshwater interim sediment quality guideline
(ISQG) was equal to the TEL and is representative of the concentration below which
adverse effects are not anticipated for aquatic life associated with bed sediments (CCME
1995). A PEL was also calculated to establish concentrations above which adverse
effects are likely to occur.
Ontario Sediment Effect Levels
Persaud et al. (1993) derived sediment effect levels for the protection of aquatic
organisms in Ontario, Canada. Three types of sediment quality guidelines were
developed; a No Effect Level (no toxic effects), a Low Effect Level (tolerable by benthic
species), and a Severe Effect Level (detrimental to most benthic species). A summary
and review of the available approaches to sediment guideline development and the
protocol for the derivation of the Ontario values is described in detail in Persaud et al.
(1993). Briefly, the No Effect Level is obtained through a chemical equilibrium
approach using water quality standards. Because the equilibrium partitioning approach is
only predictive for nonpolar organics, a No Effect Level is not derived for metals and
polar organics. The Low Effect Level and Severe Effect Level are based on the 5th and
95th percentiles of all effects data for bulk sediment analysis, respectively. For non-polar
organics these concentrations were normalized for total organic carbon.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Equilibrium Partitioning Guidelines
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has compiled summary tables of the lowest
chronic values (LCVs) in surface water for fish, daphnids, and non-daphnid invertebrates
for nonionic organics (see Section C-l). Using on these values, sediment equilibrium
partitioning (EqP) guidelines were calculated based on the chemical Koc and normalizing
C-7
-------
to 1% total organic carbon (Jones et al. 1997). Secondary chronic values (SCVs),
intended to be conservative predictors of effects, were also calculated using the same EqP
approach.
Of these sources, the following are excluded from use in this risk assessment due to inadequate
documentation of derivation methodology, use of site-specific assumptions, use of marine or
estuarine sediments, use of inappropriate receptors, or errors in benchmark derivation.
• USEPA Region 5 Screening Levels
• USEPA Region 4 Screening Levels
CCME Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG/PEL)
Ontario Sediment Effect Levels (Low/Severe)
ORNL EqP Guidelines
Of the remaining sources, a benchmark selection hierarchy is established as follows and a
summary of all selected sediment toxicity benchmarks is shown in Table C-2.
Consensus based TEC (MacDonald et al., 2000)
ARCs TEL (Ingersoll et al., 1996)
NOAA ERL (Long and Morgan, 1990)
References:
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 1995. Protocol for the Derivation of
Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. CCME EPC-98E. Prepared by
Environment Canada, Guidelines Division, Technical Secretariat of the CCME Task Group on Water
Quality Guidelines, Ottawa. [Reprinted in Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, Chapter 6,
CCME, 1999, Winnipeg.]
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2001. Canadian Sediment Quality
Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life: Summary Tables - Updated. In: Canadian Environmental
Quality Guidelines, CCME, 1999, Winnipeg.
Jones, DS, GW Suter II, RN Hull. 1997. Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of
Potential Concern for Effects on Sediment-Dwelling Biota: 1997 Revision. Oak Ridge National
Laboratory. Document # ES/ER/TM-95/R4.
Long, ER and LG Morgan. 1990. The Potential for Biological Effects of Sediment-Sorbed Contaminants
Tested in the National Status and Trends Program. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Publication. Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 52. March 1990.
Long, ER DD MacDonald, SL Smith, FD Calder. 1995. Incidence of Adverse Biological Effects Within
Ranges of Chemical Concentrations in Marine and Estuarine Sediments. Environmental Management
MacDonald, DD, RS Carr, FD Calder, ER Long, CG Ingersoll. 1996. Development and Evaluation of
C-8
-------
Sediment Quality Guidelines for Florida Coastal Waters. Ecotoxicology 5:253-278.
MacDonald, DD, CG Ingersoll and TA Berger. 2000. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based
Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems. Archives of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology 39:20-31.
Persaud, D, R Jaagumagi, H Hayton. 1993. Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic
Sediment Quality in Ontario. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Waster Resources Branch, Toronto.
August 1993. ISBN 0-7729-9248-7.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2002. Region 4 Ecological Risk Assessment Bulletins -
Supplement to RAGS. Downloaded on July 15, 2002 from website:
http://www.epa.gov/region04/waste/ots/ecolbul.htm
C-9
-------
Wildlife Receptors (Birds & Mammals)
C-3 Dose-Based Toxicity Reference Values
Numerous studies have been conducted that provide information on toxicity associated with
experimental exposures for a variety of birds and mammals. Because conducting an extensive
literature search and rigorous review of all experimental studies and developing site-specific
Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) for each wildlife receptor for each chemical is not feasible,
dose-based TRVs for birds and mammals were compiled from secondary sources.
Because the purpose of a wildlife risk assessment is to evaluate wildlife exposures from
ingestion of contaminated media from a site over the lifetime of the receptor, TRVs derived from
studies in which the exposure route was oral (eg: via ingestion in diet or water or via gavage),
and dosing occurred over a long period of time (chronic exposure) or during a critical lifestage
period are preferred. In addition, wildlife TRVs which represent relevant toxicity endpoints for
population sustainability (eg: growth, reproduction, mortality) are preferred over endpoints such
as tissue bioaccumulation or biochemical effects. Finally, because it is expected that the adverse
effect threshold will vary from species to species within any particular taxonomic group, TRVs
which are protective of the more sensitive species are preferred.
Three different secondary sources were identified which provided wildlife TRVs that were
derived taking each of the above factors into consideration. Each of these sources is described
briefly below.
USEPA (2003)
Wildlife TRVs for several chemicals have been derived for the calculation of USEPA
Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco-SSLs). One mammalian and one avian TRV
expressed as mg contaminant per kg body weight (mg/kg BW/d) were derived based on
specific standard operating procedures (SOPs) for performing literature searches, data
review and extraction, and TRV derivation (USEPA, 2003). After an extensive literature
search, relevant toxicity papers were "coded" into a web-based database. As part of the
coding process, a NOAEL and LOAEL TRV were selected for each toxicity endpoint
from each study. Each selected TRV was also assigned an overall score for ten
data/study quality criteria (highest score = 100). To ensure that low quality studies were
excluded from the TRV derivation process, the Eco-SSL TRV was derived from those
endpoints that had an overall score higher than 65.
The derived TRV was, in most cases, the geometric mean of all No Observed Adverse
Effect Levels (NOAELs) for growth and reproductive effects or the highest bounded
NOAEL below the lowest bounded Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) for
growth, reproduction or survival. A single bird TRV and mammal TRV was derived
which represents the highest no effect level below the level which effects are first
observed across multiple species and endpoints. Table C-3 provides the mammal and
C- 10
-------
bird Eco-SSL TRVs for inorganic chemicals.
Engineering Field Activity West (1998)
Engineering Field Activity West (1998) developed wildlife TRVs for the purposes of
conducting ecological risk assessments at Naval facilities in California. The Navy, in
consultation with the USEPA Region 9 Biological Technical Advisory Group (BTAG),
developed High and Low TRVs for birds and mammals. Data on ecological effects were
compiled after a comprehensive literature search process. Studies focusing on test
conditions similar to those expected in the field were preferred. Specific criteria
included: test species similar to those expected in the field, oral exposure routes, chronic
exposure durations, endpoints related to reproduction, growth, and development, study
designs that deemed to be of high quality.
The High TRV was selected from the middle of the range of all sublethal effect levels
across multiple studies for a particular chemical. The Low TRV was representative of a
chronic no effect level and incorporated results from multiple studies. In some cases, the
High and Low TRVs were derived using dose levels from the same study; in other cases,
these TRVs were derived from different studies. In addition, a relative confidence level
is given for each derived TRV. This confidence level provides information on whether
the toxicity dataset included sensitive lifestages, included chronic exposure durations,
and the number of species and receptor groups represented.
In some cases, only a High TRV could be established from the available toxicity data.
Engineering Field Activity West (1998) used an uncertainty factor (UF) of 10 to estimate
the Low TRV from the High TRV (ie: High/10 = Low). Although studies with chronic
exposure durations were preferred, some selected studies had exposure durations that
were subchronic. A UF of 10 was used to estimate the chronic TRV from a subchronic
TRV (ie: subchronic/10 = chronic). Table C-4 provides the mammal and bird LOAEL
and NOAEL TRVs for inorganic chemicals selected in Engineering Field Activity West
(1998).
Sample et al. (1996)
Sample et al. (1996) summarized available literature on the toxicity of contaminants in
avian and mammalian wildlife receptors in order to calculate screening-level risk-based
concentration values in water and the diet. From the toxicological literature, Sample et
al. selected a single toxicity study for birds and a single toxicity study mammals and
identified a LOAEL and NOAEL TRV (expressed as mg/kg BW/d). The selected study
was chosen based on an evaluation of the available toxicity data, emphasizing those
studies which provided information on reproductive and developmental endpoints,
multiple exposure levels, and statistical comparisons to controls. In cases where toxicity
data were available for multiple species, Sample et al. selected the study which provided
the most conservative estimate of the TRV.
C-ll
-------
In some cases, the selected study provided only a LOAEL TRV. Sample et al. used a UF
of 10 to estimate the NOAEL TRV (ie: LOAEL/10 = NOAEL). Although studies with
chronic exposure durations were preferred, some selected studies had exposure durations
that were subchronic. Sample et al. used a UF of 10 to estimate the chronic TRV from a
subchronic TRV (ie: subchronic/10 = chronic). Table C-5 provides the mammal and bird
LOAEL and NOAEL TRVs for inorganic chemicals selected by Sample et al.
For the purposes of calculating hazard quotients (HQs) for wildlife, the Eco-SSL TRVs for birds
and mammals were used preferentially. If an Eco-SSL TRV was not available for a specific
contaminant, then the geomean of the High TRV and Low TRV provided by Engineering Field
Activity West (1998) was used. If a TRV was not available from Engineering Field Activity
West (1998), the geomean of the LOAEL TRV and NOAEL TRV provided by Sample et al.
(1996) was used. The wildlife TRVs selected based on this hierarchy are presented in Table 7-4
(in the main Baseline ERA report).
References:
Engineering Field Activity West. 1998. Development of Toxicity Reference Values for Conducting
Ecological Risk Assessment at Naval Facilities in California, Interim Final. EFA West, Naval Facilities
Engineering Command. United States Navy. San Bruno, CA. September 1998.
Sample, BE, DM Opresko, GW Suter II. 1996. Toxicological Benchmarks for Wildlife: 1996 Revision.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Document Number ES/ER/TM-86/R3. lune 1996.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003. Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil
Screening Levels (Eco-SSLs). OSWER Directive 92857-55. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. November 2003.
C- 12
-------
Table C-la
Surface Water Toxicity Benchmarks for Aquatic Receptors
Analyte
Type
Inorganics
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Fluoride
Fluorine
Iron
Lead
Lithium
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Phosphorus
Potassium
Selenium
Silica
Silver
Sodium
Strontium
Sulfide
Sulfur
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
ACUTE
NAWQC - Acute
(ug/L)1
750 6
--
340 9, 10
50,000 8
--
2.0 4, 10
--
570 4, 10
16 10
13 4,10
22 12
--
--
65 4, 10
--
--
1.2
468 4, 10
--
--
3 4, 10
--
-
117 4,10
GLWQI
Tier II SAV
(ug/L)2
180
110
35
30
--
--
1,500
--
--
--
260
2,300
16,000
--
--
--
15,000
110
280
USEPA R4
Acute
(ug/L)2
750
1300
360
--
16
--
3.92
--
1,740
16
17.7
79
--
--
81.6
--
--
2.4
1420
--
20
4.06
--
140
117
Surface Water
Acute
Benchmark
(ug/L)
750
180
340
50,000
35
30
2.01
no benchmark
570
16
1,500
13
77
no benchmark
no benchmark
no benchmark
65
260
no benchmark
2,300
1.2
16,000
468
no benchmark
no benchmark
20
no benchmark
3
no benchmark
15,000
no benchmark
no benchmark
110
280
117
CHRONIC
NAWQC -
Chronic (ug/L) 1
87
--
150 9,10
5,000 3
--
0.25 4, 10
--
74 4, 10
10.6 10
8.96 4, 10
5.2 12
--
1,000
2.52 4, 10
--
--
0.65
52.0 4, 10
--
5.0 11
0.3 3
--
2.0
-
118.14 4,10
GLWQI
Tier II SCV
(ug/L)2
30
--
0.66
1.6
--
--
23
--
--
--
14
120
1.3
370
--
--
0.36
1,500
12
20
USEPA R4 -
Chronic
(ug/L)2
87
160
190
--
0.53
750
1.13
--
207
11
11.8
5.2
--
1,000
3.18
--
--
0.012
158
--
5
0.012
--
4
106
Other (ug/L)2
--
--
7,000 EC20 Daphnids
116,000 LCV Daphnids
--
--
5
1080 EC25 Bass Pop.
300 CCME WQO
--
82,000 LCV Daphnids
--
--
53,000 LCV Daphnids
--
--
680,000 LCV Daphnids
--
-
Surface Water
Chronic
Benchmark
(ug/L)
87
30
150
5,000
0.66
1.60
0.25
116000
74
11
23
9
5.2
1080
no benchmark
1,000
2.5
14
82,000
120
0.65
370
52
no benchmark
53,000
5.0
no benchmark
0.3
680,000
1,500
2.0
no benchmark
12
20
118
1 USEPA, 2002. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria: 2002. November 2002. EPA 822-R-02-047.
2 Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA) Database version 3.0 - Table "Ecological SW Benchmarks"
3 Only acute NAWQC available; chronic NAWQC is equal to acute / 10.
4 Metal toxicity is hardness-dependent; values shown are calculated based on a hardness of 100 mg/L.
5 National Irrigation Water Quality Program (1998)
6 Aluminum NAWQC apply to waters with pH of 6.5 - 9.0.
7 Alkalinity NAWQC is the minimum required value.
8 Based on USEPA Gold Book value.
9 NAWQC derived from data for As 3+, but is applied here to total arsenic (this implies that As 3+ and As 5+ are equally toxic and their toxicities are additive).
10 NAWQC expressed in terms of the dissolved fraction.
11 NAWQC expressed in terms of the total recoverable fraction.
12 NAWQC expressed in terms of free cyanide.
NAWQC = National Ambient Water Quality Criteria
GLQWI = Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative
SAV/SCV = Secondary Acute/Chronic Value
CCME = Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment
WQG = Water Quality Guidelines
LCV = Lowest Chronic Value
EC20 = Effect Concentration Causing Less Than 20% Reduction
SW Aquatic Benchmarks.xls: SW Bnchmrks
6/10/2004
-------
Table C-lb
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Metals that are Hardness-Dependent
and Freshwater Conversion Factors for the Calculation of Dissolved Fraction
Analyte
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium III
Chromium VI
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Hardness-Dependent Parameters
where:
A WQCtot = exp(a * ln(H) + b)
Acute
a
b
Chronic
a
b
Not Hardness Dependent
1.0166
0.819
-3.924
3.7256
0.7409
0.8190
-4.7190
0.6848
Not Hardness Dependent
0.9422
1.273
-1.7
-1.46
0.8545
1.2730
-1.7020
-4.7050
Not Hardness Dependent
0.846
1.72
0.8473
2.255
-6.52
0.884
0.8460
~
0.8473
0.0584
~
0.8840
AWQC based on
Total Recoverable
(ug/L)
Acute
340
2.1
1803
16
14
82
1.40
469
4.1
120
Chronic
150
0.27
86
11
9
3.2
0.77
52
0.41
120
Total/Dissolved Conversion Factors
where:
AWQCdiss =AWQCtot * [m-n*(ln(H)]
Acute
m
1.0000
1.1367
0.3160
0.9820
0.9600
1.4620
0.8500
0.9980
0.8500
0.9780
n
0.0000
0.0418
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1457
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Chronic
m
1.0000
1.1017
0.8600
0.9620
0.9600
1.4620
0.8500
0.9970
~
0.9860
n
0.0000
0.0418
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1457
0.0000
0.0000
~
0.0000
AWQC based on
Dissolved (ug/L)
Acute
340
2.0
570
16
13
65
1.2
468
3
117
Chronic
150
0.25
74
11
9
3
0.7
52
0.3
118
~ = not available
AWQCs are presented based on the hardness of 100 mg/L.
Sources:
USEPA, 2002. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria: 2002. US Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology. November 2002. EPA 822-R-02-047.
Notes:
Silver chronic AWQC is not available; chronic AWQC is equal to the acute criterion /10.
SW Aquatic Benchmarks.xls
6/10/2004
-------
Table C-2
Sediment Toxicity Benchmarks for Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Phosphorus
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Sulfide
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Threshold Effect Concentrations (TEC)1
Consensus-
Based TEC
(mg/kg) a
-
-
9.8
-
-
0.99
-
43
-
32
-
-
36
-
-
0.18
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
121
ARCS
TEL
(mg/kg) b
25,519
-
11
-
-
0.58
-
36
-
28
-
188,400
37
-
631
-
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
98
Other (mg/kg)
-
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
NOAA ERL c
NOAA ERL c
Sediment
Screening
Benchmark
(mg/kg)
25,519
2.0
9.8
no benchmark
no benchmark
1.0
no benchmark
43
no benchmark
32
no benchmark
188,400
36
no benchmark
631
0.18
23
no benchmark
no benchmark
no benchmark
1
no benchmark
no benchmark
no benchmark
no benchmark
121
Probable Effect Concentrations (PEC)2
Consensus-
Based PEC
(mg/kg) a
-
-
33.0
-
-
4.98
-
Ill
-
149
-
-
128
-
-
1.06
48.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
459
ARCS
PEL
(mg/kg) b
59,572
-
48.0
-
-
3.2
-
120
-
100
-
247,600
82.0
-
1,184
-
33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
540
Other (mg/kg)
-
25.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.7
-
-
-
-
-
NOAA ERM c
NOAA ERM c
Sediment
Screening
Benchmark
(mg/kg)
59,572
25.0
33.0
no benchmark
no benchmark
5.0
no benchmark
111
no benchmark
149
no benchmark
247,600
128
no benchmark
1184
1.06
49
no benchmark
no benchmark
no benchmark
4
no benchmark
no benchmark
no benchmark
no benchmark
459
Notes:
1 The TEC encompasses several types of sediment quality guidelines including the Lowest Effect Level (LEL), the Threshold Effect Level (TEL), the Effect Range
Low (ERL), the TEL for Hyalella azetca in 28 day tests (TEL-HA28), and the Minimum Effect Threshold (MET).
2 The PEC encompasses several types of sediment quality guidelines including the Severe Effect Level (SEL), the Probable Effect Level (TEL), the Effect Range
Median (ERM), the PEL for Hyalella azetca in 28 day tests (PEL-HA28), and the Toxic Effect Threshold (TET).
Sources Hierarchy:
a MacDonald et al. (2000); consensus-based threshold effect concentration (TEC) and probable effect concentration (PEC).
b Ingersoll, et al. (1996); Threshold Effect Level (TEL) and Probable Effect Level (PEL) for total extraction of sediment (BT) samples fromffyalella azteca 28-day
c Long and Morgan (1990); NOAA Effect Range Low (ERL) and Effect Range Median (ERM).
Sed Aquatic Benchmarks.xls: TECs & PECs
6/10/2004
-------
Table C-3
USEPA (2003)1 Eco-SSL Toxicity Reference Values for Wildlife
Contaminant
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (3+)
Chromium (6+)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Vanadium
Zinc
Mammal TRV 2
(mg/kg BW/d)
Bird TRV 2
(mg/kg BW/d)
Narrative Statement
0.059
Pending
51.8
0.532
0.770
Pending
Pending
7.34
Pending
Insufficient Data
Pending
Insufficient Data
Insufficient Data
1.47
Pending
Insufficient Data
7.61
Pending
Narrative Statement
4.70
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
1.63
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
Footnotes:
1 See USEPA (2003) for detailed information on the derived TRV.
TRV is repesentative of a high NOAEL, just below the effects threshold.
3 Aluminum is expected to be a contaminant of potential concern only when
soil pH is below 5.5.
Iron is an essential nutrient for wildlife, and is not expected to be a primary
contaminant of concern at most sites.
IS&R BERA TRVs.xls
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table C-4
Engineering Field Activity West (1998) Toxicity Reference Values for Wildlife
Contaminant
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Dose 2
Reference
Confidence 3
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Mammal TRY
(mg/kg BW/d)
High
4.7
Brown et al. (1976)
Low
0.32
Schroeder et al. (1968)
+s +c 2/2
No Mammal TRY:
Insufficient Data
No Mammal TRY:
Insufficient Data
2.64
Schroeder & Mitchener
(1971)
0.06
Webster (1988)
+s +c 2/2
20
Mollenhauer et al.
(1985)
1.2
Domingo et al. (1985)
+s +c 2/2
631.58
Hebertetal. (1993)
2.67 5'6
Pocinoetal. (1991)
-s +c 2/2
240.64
Wise (1981)
0.0015
Krasovskii et al. (1979)
+s +c 2/2
159.09
Gray & Laskey ( 1980)
13.7 l
Gray & Laskey (1980)
+s +c 2/2
4 - rodents
0.27 - Ig mammals
EPA-Great Lakes;
Fuyutaetal. (1978)
0.25 - rodents
0.027 - Ig mammals
EPA-Great Lakes; Khera
&Tabacova(1973)
n/a
No Mammal TRY:
Insufficient Data
Bird TRY
(mg/kg BW/d)
High Low
22.01 9
Stanley etal. (1994)
5.5
Stanley etal. (1994)
+s +c 1/1
No Bird TRY:
Insufficient Data
No Bird TRY:
Insufficient Data
10.43
Richardson et al.
(1974)
0.08 l
Cain etal. (1983)
+s +c 4/2
No Bird TRY:
Insufficient Data
52.26
Jensen & Maurice
(1978)
2.3
Norvell etal. (1975)
+s -c 3/2
8.75
Edens & Garlich
(1983)
0.014 l
Edens etal. (1976);
Edens & Garlich
(1983)
+s +c 8/4
776
Laskey & Edens
(1985)
77.6 l
Laskey & Edens
(1985)
+s -c 2/1
0.18
EPA-Great Lakes;
Heinz & Locke
(1976)
0.039 7
EPA-Great Lakes;
Heinz (1974, 1975,
1976,1979)
n/a
No Bird TRY:
Insufficient Data
IS&R BERA TRVs.xls
6/10/2004
Pagel of 2
-------
Engineering Field Activity West (1998) Toxicity Reference Values for Wildlife
Contaminant
Nickel
Silver
Selenium
Thallium
Zinc
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Dose
Reference
Confidence
Mammal TRY
(mg/kg BW/d)
High
31.6
Smith etal. (1993)
Low
0.133 l
Smith etal. (1993)
+s +c 2/2
No Mammal TRY:
Insufficient Data
1.21
Schroeder & Mitchener
(1971)
0.05
Harr etal. (1967)
-s +c 2/2
1.43
Downs etal. (1960)
0.48
Downs etal. (1960)
-s -c 1/1
411.43
Schlicker& Cox (1968)
9.6 l-6
Aughey etal. (1977)
+s +c 2/2
Bird TRY
(mg/kg BW/d)
High Low
56.26
Cain & Pafford
(1981)
1.38 5
Cain & Pafford
(1981)
+s -c 2/2
No Bird TRY:
Insufficient Data
0.93
Heinz etal. (1989)
0.23
Heinz etal. (1989)
+s +c 2/2
No Bird TRY:
Insufficient Data
172
Gasaway & Buss
(1972)
17.2 l
Gasaway & Buss
(1972)
+s +c 3/2
Footnotes:
Uncertainty factor of 10 for low-effect to no-effect level conversion applied to arrive at low TRV.
See Navy (1998) for detailed information and rationale for the selected TRV studies and full citations.
Confidence interpretation:
s - does dataset include a sensitive lifestage (+ = yes, - = no);
c - does dataset include a chronic exposure duration (+ = yes, - = no)
n/n- ratio of the number of species in dataset to the number of groups represented, see Section 3.4 in Navy
(1998) for a summary of groups.
Mercury TRVs were selected from data in Great Lakes summary tables. See Section 5.8.2.1 in Navy (1998) for rationale
behind the selection of these TRVs. Confidence ratings were not applied to these TRVs.
Uncertainty factor of 10 for subchronic to chronic conversion applied to arrive at low TRV.
Low TRV was adjusted for or is close to nutritional requirements.
7 EPA applied to the dose an uncertainty factor of 2 for low-effect to no-effect conversion.
The diversity of test organisms in the cadmium data was limited. The workgroup had high confidence in the TRV for
waterfowl, but lower confidence if the TRV is applied to other birds.
The workgroup considered this TRV to be very conservative for granivorous birds.
IS&R BERA TRVs.xls
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table C-5
Sample et al. (1996) Toxicity Reference Values for Wildlife
Contaminant
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Chromium (3+)
Chromium (6+)
Copper
Cyanide
Fluoride
Lead
Lithium
Manganese
Mercury,
inorganic
Mercury,
organic
Molybdenum
Dose1
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Mammal TRY
(mg/kg BW/d)
LOAEL
19.3
NOAEL
1.93 2
Ondreicka et al. (1966)
1.25
0.125 2
Schroeder et al. (1968b)
1.26
0.126 2
Schroeder & Mitchener (1971)
19.8 3
Borzelleca et al. (1988)
—
5.1
Perry et al. (1983)
0.66
Schroeder & Mitchener (1975)
93.6
28
Weir & Fisher (1972)
10
1
Sutouetal. (1980b)
—
2737
Ivankovic & Preussmann (1975)
13.14 3
Steven et al. (1976)
15.14
3.28
MacKenzie et al. (1958)
11.7
Aulerich et al. (1982)
—
68.7
Tewe&Maner(1981)
52.75
31.37
Aulerich et al. (1987)
80
8
Azaretal. (1973)
18.8
9.4
Marathe & Thomas (1986)
284
88
Laskeyetal. (1982)
—
1
Aulerich et al. (1974)
mink - 0.025
rat -0.16
mink - 0.015
rat - 0.032
mink - Wobeser et al. (1976)
rat - Verschuuren et al. (9176)
2.6
0.26 2
Schroeder & Mitchener (1971)
Bird TRY
(mg/kg BW/d)
LOAEL NOAEL
—
109.7
Carriere et al. (1986)
No Bird TRY: Insufficient Data
12.84
5.14
USFWS (1964)
41.7
20.8 3
Johnson et al. (1960)
No Bird TRY: Insufficient Data
100
28.8
Smith & Anders (1989)
20
1.45
White &Finley (1978)
5
1
Haseltine et al., unpubl. Data
No Bird TRY: Insufficient Data
61.7
47
Mehringetal. (1960)
No Bird TRY: Insufficient Data
32
7.8
Patteeetal. (1988)
11.3
1.13
Edensetal. (1976)
No Bird TRY: Insufficient Data
—
977
Laskey&Edens(1985)
0.9
0.45
Hill &Schaffner (1976)
0.064
0.0064 2
Heinz (1979)
35.3
3.5
Lepore& Miller (1965)
IS&R BERATRVs.xls
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 2
-------
Sample et al. (1996) Toxicity Reference Values for Wildlife
Contaminant
Nickel
Selenium,
inorganic
Selenium,
organic
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Dose
Reference
Mammal TRY
(mg/kg BW/d)
LOAEL
80
NOAEL
40
Ambrose et al. (1976)
No Mammal TRV: Insufficient Data
No Mammal TRV: Insufficient Data
0.074 3
0.0074 2'3
Formigli et al. (1986)
2.1
0.21 2
Domingo et al. (1986)
320
160
Schlicker& Cox (1968)
Bird TRV
(mg/kg BW/d)
LOAEL NOAEL
107
77.4
Cam &Pafford (1981)
1
0.5
Heinz etal. (1987)
0.8
0.4
Heinz et al. (1989) 4
No Bird TRV: Insufficient Data
—
11.4
White & Dieter (1978)
131
14.5
Stahl etal. (1990)
Footnotes:
See Sample et al. (1996) for detailed information on the selected TRV studies and full citations.
A NOAEL was estimated by dividing the LOAEL by a factor of 10.
A chronic TRV was estimated by dividing the subchronic TRV by a factor of 10.
Toxicity data for selenomethionine were provided for the mallard duck, screech owl, and black-crowned night heron.
Toxicity data for the most sensitive species (mallard duck) are presented in this table.
IS&R BERATRVs.xls
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 2
-------
APPENDIX D
Detailed Plant Community Data
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
D-l Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - December 2002
D-2 Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - July 2003
D-3 Plant Biomass Determination - July 2003
Plant Community Data Details.xls
-------
APPENDIX D-l
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - December 2002
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
1
1
1
1
1
1
Work
Area
WAI
WAI
WAI
WAS
WA5
WA5
Location
7e
le
2e
50e
51e
52e
Common Name
Dogbane
SUM
Bulbous bluegrass
Ragweed
Dalmation Toadflax
Red-stem Filaree
Big Sagebrush
Broom Snakeweed
Red three awn
Cheat grass
Curlycup Gumweed
SUM
Red-stem Filaree
Cheatgrass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Bulbous bluegrass
Red three awn
Babysbreath
SUM
Mule's Ear
Bulbous bluegrass
Perennial grass
Babysbreath
SUM
Bulbous bluegrass
Curlycup Gumweed
Red-stem Filaree
Sunflower
Mule's Ear
Perennial grass
SUM
Mule's Ear
Bulbous bluegrass
Curlycup Gumweed
Perennial Grasses
Ragweed
Dalmation Toad Flax
SUM
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
7.0%
7.0%
30.0%
1.0%
0.5%
2.0%
33.5%
13.0%
2.0%
0.5%
0.5%
4.0%
20.0%
6.0%
23.0%
1.0%
30.0%
10.0%
1.0%
0.5%
11.5%
4.0%
16.0%
0.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.5%
22.5%
Quadrat N
20.0%
1.0%
8.0%
2.0%
1.0%
32.0%
6.0%
2.0%
0.5%
1.0%
3.0%
12.5%
16.0%
12.0%
3.0%
31.0%
9.0%
0.5%
4.0%
0.5%
2.0%
16.0%
3.0%
10.0%
0.5%
13.5%
Quadrat E
13.0%
1.0%
1.0%
19.0%
34.0%
4.0%
1.0%
1.0%
10.0%
4.0%
20.0%
5.0%
24.0%
0.5%
29.5%
19.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
22.0%
4.0%
5.0%
0.5%
0.5%
10.0%
Quadrat S
2.0%
2.0%
19.0%
2.0%
2.0%
1.0%
1.0%
25.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.5%
1.0%
11.0%
16.0%
30.5%
5.0%
15.0%
0.5%
20.5%
10.0%
1.0%
0.5%
1.0%
0.5%
13.0%
9.0%
12.0%
1.0%
0.5%
1.0%
0.5%
24.0%
Quadrat W
4.0%
4.0%
14.0%
0.5%
2.0%
5.0%
6.0%
27.5%
1.0%
2.0%
1.0%
1.0%
6.0%
0.5%
11.5%
4.0%
11.0%
0.5%
0.5%
16.0%
10.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.5%
13.5%
4.0%
7.0%
0.5%
11.5%
% Com position
Quadrat 1
100.0%
89.6%
3.0%
1.5%
6.0%
65.0%
10.0%
2.5%
2.5%
20.0%
20.0%
76.7%
3.3%
87.0%
8.7%
4.3%
17.8%
71.1%
2.2%
4.4%
2.2%
2.2%
Quadrat N
62.5%
3.1%
25.0%
6.3%
3.1%
48.0%
16.0%
4.0%
8.0%
24.0%
51.6%
38.7%
9.7%
56.3%
3.1%
25.0%
3.1%
12.5%
22.2%
74.1%
3.7%
Quadrat E
38.2%
2.9%
2.9%
55.9%
20.0%
5.0%
5.0%
50.0%
20.0%
16.9%
81.4%
1.7%
86.4%
4.5%
4.5%
4.5%
40.0%
50.0%
5.0%
5.0%
Quadrat S
100.0%
76.0%
8.0%
8.0%
4.0%
4.0%
3.3%
3.3%
1.6%
3.3%
36.1%
52.5%
24.4%
73.2%
2.4%
76.9%
7.7%
3.8%
7.7%
3.8%
37.5%
50.0%
4.2%
2.1%
4.2%
2.1%
Quadrat W
100.0%
50.9%
1.8%
7.3%
18.2%
21.8%
8.7%
17.4%
8.7%
8.7%
52.2%
4.3%
25.0%
68.8%
3.1%
3.1%
74.1%
14.8%
7.4%
3.7%
34.8%
60.9%
4.3%
MEAN
% Cover
4.3%
2.6%
19.2%
1.1%
0.5%
1.6%
8.0%
3.5%
12.5%
1.0%
1.0%
30.4%
5.0%
1.6%
0.6%
0.9%
6.8%
10.0%
0.5%
18.9%
7.2%
17.0%
1.1%
0.5%
25.4%
11.6%
0.9%
1.6%
0.9%
2.0%
0.5%
15.2%
4.8%
10.0%
0.6%
0.8%
0.7%
0.5%
16.3%
% Comp
100.0%
63.4%
3.1%
0.3%
5.5%
5.0%
4.9%
15.5%
0.8%
1.4%
29.0%
10.3%
3.4%
5.5%
36.4%
14.5%
0.9%
27.6%
67.7%
4.1%
0.6%
76.1%
4.8%
10.5%
4.6%
2.5%
1.5%
30.5%
61.2%
3.9%
1.3%
2.3%
0.9%
ZONE 1 MEAN 18.1%
Page 1 of 6
-------
APPENDIX D-l
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - December 2002
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
Work
Area
Location
Common Name
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N | Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
% Com position
Quadrat 1 | Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
MEAN
% Cover | %Comp
2
2
2
2
WAS
WAS
WAS
WA6
23e
24e
27e
56e
Wheatgrass, Agropyron spp.
Bulbous bluegrass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Dalmation Toadflax
SUM
Wheatgrass, Agropyron spp.
Bulbous bluegrass
Perennial grass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Grayrabbitbrush
Cheat grass
SUM
Wheatgrass, Agropyron spp.
Bulbous bluegrass
Curlycup Gumweed
Babysbreath
Dalmation Toadflax
Cheat grass
SUM
Wheatgrass, Agropyron spp.
Dalmation Toadflax
Cheat grass
Annual Forb
Curlycup Gumweed
SUM
16.0%
16.0%
10.0%
4.0%
14.0%
5.0%
5.0%
1.0%
0.5%
11.5%
10.0%
1.0%
0.5%
11.5%
1.0%
4.0%
0.5%
0.5%
6.0%
11.0%
3.0%
2.0%
0.5%
16.5%
12.0%
1.0%
0.5%
13.5%
5.0%
0.5%
1.0%
0.5%
7.0%
9.0%
9.0%
11.0%
3.0%
1.0%
15.0%
5.0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
9.0%
1.0%
1.0%
11.0%
11.0%
3.0%
0.5%
2.0%
0.5%
17.0%
7.0%
9.0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
17.5%
6.0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
7.5%
18.0%
0.5%
1.0%
0.5%
20.0%
11.0%
3.0%
1.0%
15.0%
10.0%
2.0%
12.0%
9.0%
0.5%
0.5%
10.0%
100.0%
71.4%
28.6%
43.5%
43.5%
8.7%
4.3%
87.0%
8.7%
4.3%
16.7%
66.7%
8.3%
8.3%
66.7%
18.2%
12.1%
3.0%
88.9%
7.4%
3.7%
71.4%
7.1%
14.3%
7.1%
100.0%
73.3%
20.0%
6.7%
71.4%
7.1%
7.1%
7.1%
7.1%
100.0%
81.8%
9.1%
9.1%
64.7%
17.6%
2.9%
11.8%
2.9%
40.0%
51.4%
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
80.0%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
90.0%
2.5%
5.0%
2.5%
73.3%
20.0%
6.7%
83.3%
16.7%
90.0%
5.0%
5.0%
10.6%
1.8%
0.8%
0.8%
0.5%
12.4%
10.8%
3.2%
1.3%
0.5%
0.5%
2.0%
0.5%
15.5%
7.8%
4.1%
0.8%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
12.3%
7.4%
0.8%
0.5%
0.8%
0.5%
8.6%
77.7%
15.7%
2.7%
3.5%
0.5%
69.9%
20.9%
5.1%
0.6%
0.6%
2.4%
0.6%
65.4%
23.7%
4.6%
3.6%
2.0%
0.6%
85.7%
3.1%
4.6%
3.9%
2.8%
ZONE 2 MEAN 12.2%
Page 2 of 6
-------
APPENDIX D-l
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - December 2002
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
Work
Area
Location
Common Name
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N | Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
% Com position
Quadrat 1 | Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
MEAN
% Cover | %Comp
3
3
WAS
WAS
WAS
106e
108e
138
Bulbous bluegrass
Perennial Grass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
SUM
Bulbous bluegrass
Yellow Sweetclover
Perennial grass
Red-stem Filaree
SUM
Ragweed
Bulbous bluegrass
Curlycup Gumweed
Yellow Sweetclover
Crested Wheatgrass
Cheat grass
Red-stem Filaree
SUM
12.0%
2.0%
0.5%
14.5%
5.0%
3.0%
1.0%
3.0%
12.0%
1.0%
10.0%
0.5%
3.0%
4.0%
0.5%
19.0%
5.0%
3.0%
0.5%
8.5%
11.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
20.0%
0.5%
5.0%
11.0%
0.5%
0.5%
17.5%
9.0%
2.0%
11.0%
19.0%
1.0%
20.0%
0.5%
3.0%
3.0%
0.5%
7.0%
10.0%
1.0%
0.5%
11.5%
18.0%
0.5%
0.5%
2.0%
21.0%
1.0%
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
0.5%
16.5%
9.0%
1.0%
0.5%
10.5%
4.0%
1.0%
1.0%
6.0%
6.0%
4.0%
3.0%
0.5%
13.5%
82.8%
13.8%
3.4%
41.7%
25.0%
8.3%
25.0%
5.3%
52.6%
2.6%
15.8%
21.1%
2.6%
58.8%
35.3%
5.9%
55.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2.9%
28.6%
62.9%
2.9%
2.9%
81.8%
18.2%
95.0%
5.0%
7.1%
42.9%
42.9%
7.1%
87.0%
8.7%
4.3%
85.7%
2.4%
2.4%
9.5%
6.1%
36.4%
30.3%
24.2%
3.0%
85.7%
9.5%
4.8%
66.7%
16.7%
16.7%
44.4%
29.6%
22.2%
3.7%
9.0%
1.8%
0.5%
0.5%
11.2%
11.4%
1.6%
1.3%
3.0%
15.8%
0.8%
6.0%
0.5%
4.0%
5.0%
0.5%
0.5%
14.7%
79.2%
17.1%
2.0%
1.6%
68.8%
10.8%
9.5%
10.9%
4.3%
41.0%
0.5%
15.1%
34.6%
3.9%
0.6%
ZONE 3 MEAN 13.9%
Page 3 of 6
-------
APPENDIX D-l
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - December 2002
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
Work
Area
Location
Common Name
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N | Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
% Com position
Quadrat 1 | Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
MEAN
% Cover | %Comp
4
4
4
4
4
WA7
WA7
WA7
WA7
WA7
67e
68e
(There is scattered
Gray Rabbitbrush
in the area.)
70e
71e
(This area is on the
old railroad grade.)
72e
Common Rye
Ragweed
Dogbane
Cheat grass
Sunflower
Perennial grass
Red-stem filaree
Bulbous bluegrass
Dalmation Toadflax
Curlycup Gumweed
SUM
Bulbous bluegrass
Cheat grass
Curlycup Gumweed
Dalmation Toadflax
Crested Wheatgrass
Gray Rabbitbrush
Perennial grass
Red-stem Filaree
SUM
Cheat grass
Dalmation Toadflax
Dogbane
Perennial grass
Annual Forb
Curlycup gumweed
Hoary Cress
Willow
SUM
Ragweed
Cheat grass
Rye grass
Hoary Cress
Willow
Red three awn
Bulbous bluegrass
SUM
Red three awn
Dalmation Toadflax
Perennail grass
Bulbous bluegrass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Cheat grass
SUM
25.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.5%
27.5%
11.0%
1.0%
0.5%
12.5%
1.0%
1.0%
2.0%
4.0%
1.0%
1.0%
11.0%
13.0%
5.0%
1.0%
11.0%
3.0%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
22.0%
1.0%
0.5%
16.0%
1.0%
18.5%
12.0%
1.0%
13.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
4.0%
7.0%
1.0%
1.0%
7.0%
9.0%
1.0%
6.0%
2.0%
2.0%
11.0%
5.0%
6.0%
0.5%
2.0%
6.0%
19.5%
1.0%
2.0%
1.0%
3.0%
7.0%
10.0%
1.0%
1.0%
12.0%
1.0%
5.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
9.0%
1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
2.0%
2.0%
5.0%
9.0%
1.0%
1.0%
6.0%
1.0%
1.0%
10.0%
12.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
15.0%
2.0%
5.0%
0.5%
1.0%
8.5%
12.0%
1.0%
6.0%
1.0%
0.5%
20.5%
5.0%
2.0%
1.0%
8.0%
1.0%
16.0%
2.0%
19.0%
90.9%
3.6%
3.6%
1.8%
88.0%
8.0%
4.0%
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
7.7%
7.7%
84.6%
22.7%
4.5%
50.0%
13.6%
2.3%
2.3%
4.5%
5.4%
2.7%
86.5%
5.4%
92.3%
7.7%
14.3%
14.3%
14.3%
57.1%
11.1%
11.1%
77.8%
9.1%
54.5%
18.2%
18.2%
25.6%
30.8%
2.6%
10.3%
30.8%
14.3%
28.6%
14.3%
42.9%
83.3%
8.3%
8.3%
11.1%
55.6%
11.1%
11.1%
11.1%
20.0%
20.0%
60.0%
22.2%
22.2%
55.6%
10.0%
10.0%
60.0%
10.0%
10.0%
80.0%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
23.5%
58.8%
5.9%
11.8%
58.5%
4.9%
29.3%
4.9%
2.4%
62.5%
25.0%
12.5%
5.3%
84.2%
10.5%
25.0%
1.0%
1.3%
0.8%
0.5%
8.0%
1.1%
2.0%
1.0%
1.0%
14.9%
10.0%
1.0%
3.4%
0.5%
2.0%
6.0%
1.0%
1.8%
14.1%
1.3%
2.5%
1.7%
1.0%
4.0%
1.0%
3.0%
5.0%
7.0%
1.0%
1.0%
8.5%
1.0%
1.0%
16.0%
2.0%
12.6%
8.5%
1.0%
6.0%
2.0%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
7.4%
18.2%
0.7%
9.5%
1.4%
0.5%
51.1%
8.1%
3.6%
4.6%
2.2%
52.9%
6.6%
14.3%
0.5%
2.1%
6.2%
5.0%
12.5%
15.2%
27.7%
17.9%
5.4%
11.4%
2.9%
8.6%
11.1%
5.8%
6.8%
61.1%
3.7%
3.7%
16.8%
2.1%
51.4%
5.6%
28.3%
10.2%
1.1%
1.1%
2.3%
ZONE 4 MEAN 11.2%
Page 4 of 6
-------
APPENDIX D-l
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - December 2002
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
Work
Area
Location
Common Name
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N | Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
% Com position
Quadrat 1 | Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
MEAN
% Cover | %Comp
5
5
5
5
5
WA9
WA9
WA9
WA9
WA9
114e
116e
(Big Sage,
Bitterbrush, and
Yellow
Sweetclover are
scattered in the
area.)
117e
120e
127e
Bulbous bluegrass
Crested Wheatgrass
Cheat grass
Ragweed
SUM
Bulbous bluegrass
Crested Wheatgrass
Yellow Sweetclover
Cheat grass
Red-stem Filaree
SUM
Common Rye
Perennial grass
SUM
Bulbous bluegrass
Crested Wheatgrass
Ragweed
Red three awn
Cheat grass
Babysbreath
Curlycup Gumweed
Red-stem Filaree
SUM
Bulbous bluegrass
Red three awn
Ragweed
Red-stem Filaree
Curlycup Gumweed
Dalmation Toadflax
Plant (cotton-balls)
SUM
11.0%
2.0%
0.5%
0.5%
14.0%
12.0%
5.0%
4.0%
0.5%
1.0%
22.5%
18.0%
18.0%
9.0%
4.0%
1.0%
0.5%
14.5%
23.0%
21.0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
45.5%
11.0%
1.0%
12.0%
12.0%
3.0%
10.0%
0.5%
25.5%
10.0%
10.0%
5.0%
5.0%
1.0%
11.0%
22.0%
2.0%
2.0%
0.5%
0.5%
27.0%
3.0%
0.5%
3.5%
20.0%
8.0%
0.5%
28.5%
9.0%
9.0%
5.0%
5.0%
1.0%
0.5%
0.5%
12.0%
37.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.5%
0.5%
41.0%
2.0%
3.0%
0.5%
0.5%
6.0%
5.0%
3.0%
1.0%
3.0%
12.0%
4.0%
4.0%
10.0%
3.0%
0.5%
4.0%
0.5%
0.5%
18.5%
16.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.5%
2.0%
20.5%
4.0%
0.5%
0.5%
5.0%
15.0%
6.0%
4.0%
1.0%
26.0%
8.0%
8.0%
3.0%
3.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.0%
10.5%
22.0%
10.0%
1.0%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
35.0%
78.6%
14.3%
3.6%
3.6%
53.3%
22.2%
17.8%
2.2%
4.4%
100.0%
62.1%
27.6%
6.9%
3.4%
50.5%
46.2%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
91.7%
8.3%
47.1%
11.8%
39.2%
2.0%
100.0%
45.5%
45.5%
9.1%
81.5%
7.4%
7.4%
1.9%
1.9%
85.7%
14.3%
70.2%
28.1%
1.8%
100.0%
41.7%
41.7%
8.3%
4.2%
4.2%
90.2%
4.9%
2.4%
1.2%
1.2%
33.3%
50.0%
8.3%
8.3%
41.7%
25.0%
8.3%
25.0%
100.0%
54.1%
16.2%
2.7%
21.6%
2.7%
2.7%
78.0%
4.9%
4.9%
2.4%
9.8%
80.0%
10.0%
10.0%
57.7%
23.1%
15.4%
3.8%
100.0%
28.6%
28.6%
9.5%
9.5%
4.8%
9.5%
9.5%
62.9%
28.6%
2.9%
1.4%
1.4%
2.9%
7.0%
2.7%
0.6%
0.5%
8.1%
12.8%
4.3%
6.5%
0.7%
2.0%
22.9%
11.3%
4.0%
9.8%
6.4%
4.0%
0.9%
1.8%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
1.0%
13.3%
24.0%
8.8%
0.9%
0.9%
0.5%
0.5%
1.5%
33.8%
56.7%
30.0%
8.9%
4.4%
54.0%
16.4%
20.1%
3.6%
5.9%
80.0%
20.0%
46.4%
31.9%
7.3%
6.9%
1.4%
2.3%
1.9%
1.9%
72.6%
17.4%
2.3%
3.2%
1.4%
0.6%
2.5%
ZONE 5 MEAN 17.6%
Page 5 of 6
-------
APPENDIX D-l
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - December 2002
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
Work
Area
Location
Common Name
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N | Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
% Com position
Quadrat 1 | Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S | Quadrat W
MEAN
% Cover | %Comp
Ref
Ref
Ref
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM-A
BLM-D
BLM-E
Red three awn
Broom Snakeweed
Bulbous bluegrass
Bromus tectorum
Red-stem Filaree
Perennial Annual Forb
SUM
Red three awn
Dalmation Toadflax*
Curlycup Gumweed
Bulbous bluegrass
Red-stem Filaree
SUM
14.0%
5.0%
1.0%
1.0%
10.0%
31.0%
25.0%
9.0%
1.0%
5.0%
40.0%
10.0%
20.0%
25.0%
3.0%
58.0%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
0.5%
21.5%
15.0%
4.0%
11.0%
5.0%
35.0%
14.0%
3.0%
0.5%
8.0%
0.5%
26.0%
7.0%
4.0%
10.0%
1.0%
2.0%
0.5%
24.5%
24.0%
3.0%
8.0%
35.0%
6.0%
7.0%
13.0%
2.0%
28.0%
12.0%
5.0%
11.0%
5.0%
33.0%
45.2%
16.1%
3.2%
3.2%
32.3%
62.5%
22.5%
2.5%
12.5%
17.2%
34.5%
43.1%
5.2%
32.6%
32.6%
32.6%
2.3%
42.9%
11.4%
31.4%
14.3%
53.8%
11.5%
1.9%
30.8%
1.9%
28.6%
16.3%
40.8%
4.1%
8.2%
2.0%
68.6%
8.6%
22.9%
21.4%
25.0%
46.4%
7.1%
36.4%
15.2%
33.3%
15.2%
10.4%
8.0%
12.0%
1.0%
4.4%
0.5%
35.3%
16.4%
5.4%
0.8%
7.8%
2.0%
31.1%
31.1%
20.7%
33.0%
1.5%
13.4%
0.4%
50.8%
18.1%
0.9%
26.4%
3.9%
^Either toadflax or similar weedy species.
Red three awn
Ragweed
Bulbous bluegrass
Broom Snakeweed
Red-stem Filaree
Dalmation Toadflax
Curlycup Gumweed
Cheat grass
Sunflower
SUM
6.0%
1.0%
3.0%
4.0%
1.0%
2.0%
17.0%
10.0%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
6.0%
18.0%
17.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
4.0%
24.0%
2.0%
3.0%
9.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.5%
18.5%
10.0%
1.0%
12.0%
2.0%
1.0%
26.0%
35.3%
5.9%
17.6%
23.5%
5.9%
11.8%
55.6%
2.8%
2.8%
5.6%
33.3%
70.8%
4.2%
4.2%
4.2%
16.7%
10.8%
16.2%
48.6%
5.4%
5.4%
5.4%
5.4%
2.7%
38.5%
3.8%
46.2%
7.7%
3.8%
9.0%
1.3%
5.1%
4.0%
1.2%
2.8%
1.0%
1.0%
0.5%
20.7%
42.2%
6.6%
23.9%
4.7%
5.7%
14.2%
1.1%
1.1%
0.5%
REFERENCE BLM MEAN 29.0%
Page 6 of 6
-------
APPENDIX D-2
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - July 2003
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
1
1
Work
Area
WAI
WAS
Location
2e
50e
Common Name
Dalmation Toadflax
Cheatgrass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Poa bulbosa
Species I
Bindweed
SUM
Mule's Ear
Poa Bulbosa
Blue Bunch
Species D
SUM
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
T
3.0%
11.0%
1.0%
3.0%
18.0%
40.0%
1.0%
T
1.0%
42.0%
Quadrat N
4.0%
3.0%
1.5%
0.5%
T
9.0%
75.0%
T
75.0%
Quadrat E
T
4.0%
4.0%
2.0%
1.0%
11.0%
40.0%
2.0%
T
42.0%
Quadrat S
2.0%
3.5%
1.0%
5.0%
7.0%
18.5%
35.0%
0.5%
35.5%
Quadrat W
6.0%
1.0%
5.0%
1.0%
3.0%
3.0%
19.0%
25.0%
2.0%
27.0%
% Composition
Quadrat 1
T
16.7%
61.1%
5.6%
16.7%
95.2%
2.4%
T
2.4%
Quadrat N
44.4%
33.3%
16.7%
5.6%
T
100.0%
T
Quadrat E
T
36.4%
36.4%
18.2%
9.1%
95.2%
4.8%
T
Quadrat S
10.8%
18.9%
5.4%
27.0%
37.8%
98.6%
1.4%
Quadrat W
31.6%
5.3%
26.3%
5.3%
15.8%
15.8%
92.6%
7.4%
MEAN
% Cover
5.0%
2.3%
5.0%
0.8%
2.8%
3.3%
4.0%
15.1%
43.0%
1.4%
T
1.0%
44.3%
% Comp
19.0%
16.5%
31.9%
3.3%
18.6%
12.2%
9.4%
96.3%
4.0%
T
0.5%
ZONE 1 MEAN 29.7%
2
2
2
2
WA3
WA3
WA3
WA6
23 e
24e
27e
56e
Tall Wheatgrass
Poa bulbosa
Cheat grass
Crested Wheat
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Red stem filaree
Clover
Species B
Species C
Dalmation Toadflax
SUM
Tall Wheatgrass
Poa bulbosa
Bluebunch
Crested Wheat
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Species D
Cheat grass
SUM
Tall Wheatgrass
Poa bulbosa
Milkvetch
Dalmation Toadflax
Gambel Oak
Dogbane
SUM
Tall Wheatgrass
Dalmation Toadflax
Cheat grass
Forb
4.0%
1.0%
1.0%
4.0%
1.0%
11.0%
7.0%
2.0%
3.0%
12.0%
9.0%
1.0%
10.0%
11.0%
Bluebunch Wheatgrass
SUM
11.0%
11.0%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
1.0%
16.5%
6.0%
1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
2.0%
13.0%
11.0%
1.0%
T
12.0%
5.0%
T
T
5.0%
14.0%
0.5%
0.5%
15.0%
10.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
2.0%
15.0%
10.0%
1.0%
11.0%
12.5%
T
12.5%
8.0%
0.5%
1.0%
0.5%
10.0%
12.0%
1.0%
2.0%
15.0%
85.0%
85.0%
3.0%
1.0%
T
2.0%
6.0%
11.0%
0.5%
1.0%
3.0%
1.0%
16.5%
4.0%
0.5%
2.5%
1.0%
8.0%
T
1.0%
13.0%
1.0%
15.0%
6.0%
2.0%
8.0%
36.4%
9.1%
9.1%
36.4%
9.1%
58.3%
16.7%
25.0%
90.0%
10.0%
100.0%
66.7%
6.1%
9.1%
12.1%
6.1%
46.2%
7.7%
7.7%
23.1%
15.4%
91.7%
8.3%
T
100.0%
T
T
93.3%
3.3%
3.3%
66.7%
6.7%
6.7%
6.7%
13.3%
90.9%
9.1%
100.0%
T
80.0%
5.0%
10.0%
5.0%
80.0%
6.7%
13.3%
100.0%
50.0%
16.7%
T
33.3%
66.7%
3.0%
6.1%
18.2%
6.1%
50.0%
6.3%
31.3%
12.5%
T
6.7%
86.7%
6.7%
75.0%
25.0%
9.6%
0.7%
1.0%
1.0%
2.3%
1.0%
0.5%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
1.0%
13.8%
7.8%
1.1%
2.5%
1.0%
1.0%
1.3%
3.0%
2.0%
12.6%
10.0%
1.0%
85.0%
1.0%
13.0%
1.0%
26.6%
7.5%
1.0%
T
2.0%
2.0%
8.5%
68.6%
3.4%
3.0%
1.2%
7.9%
6.3%
1.0%
3.6%
2.4%
1.2%
1.2%
60.2%
8.8%
6.3%
1.3%
1.3%
6.7%
9.6%
5.7%
54.5%
6.9%
20.0%
1.7%
17.3%
1.3%
85.0%
5.6%
T
6.3%
6.7%
T = Trace
ZONE 2 MEAN 15.4%
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX D-2
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - July 2003
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
Work
Area
Location
Common Name
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S
Quadrat W
% Composition
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S
Quadrat W
MEAN
% Cover
% Comp
3
3
3
WAS
WAS
WAS
106e
108e
138
Poa bulbosa
Perennial Grass
Ragweed
Crested Wheat
SUM
Poa bulbosa
Perennial grass
Red-stem Filaree
Toadflax
Milkvetch
Species F (Forb)
Species G
SUM
Ragweed
Poa bulbosa
Crested Wheatgrass
Cheat grass
SUM
0.5%
1.0%
2.0%
3.5%
T
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
4.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
13.0%
0.5%
5.0%
5.5%
1.0%
1.0%
T
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
0.5%
4.0%
T
10.5%
0.5%
2.0%
T
2.5%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
4.0%
6.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
0.5%
2.0%
2.5%
T
2.0%
2.0%
4.0%
4.0%
0.5%
3.0%
7.5%
0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
0.5%
1.0%
3.0%
4.5%
4.0%
4.0%
1.0%
9.0%
14.3%
28.6%
57.1%
T
25.0%
25.0%
25.0%
25.0%
38.5%
38.5%
23.1%
9.1%
90.9%
25.0%
25.0%
T
50.0%
57.1%
4.8%
38.1%
T
20.0%
80.0%
T
8.3%
8.3%
16.7%
66.7%
33.3%
66.7%
20.0%
80.0%
T
50.0%
50.0%
53.3%
6.7%
40.0%
50.0%
50.0%
11.1%
22.2%
66.7%
44.4%
44.4%
11.1%
0.5%
2.1%
T
2.0%
3.0%
0.7%
1.1%
1.0%
T
2.0%
2.3%
2.0%
4.5%
4.8%
2.2%
2.6%
T
8.6%
22.7%
65.9%
T
1 1 .4%
14.8%
26.1%
8.3%
T
18.3%
28.3%
10.0%
38.7%
25.5%
35.8%
T
ZONE 3 MEAN 5.4%
4
WA7
70e
Cheat grass
Dalmation Toadflax
Dogbane
Perennial grass
Hoary Cress
Willow
Shrub
SUM
30.0%
3.0%
33.0%
6.0%
3.0%
30.0%
39.0%
11.0%
1.0%
12.0%
20.0%
2.0%
22.0%
2.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
10.0%
25.0%
90.9%
9.1%
15.4%
7.7%
76.9%
91.7%
8.3%
90.9%
9.1%
8.0%
20.0%
20.0%
12.0%
40.0%
6.0%
13.2%
5.0%
2.0%
17.5%
2.5%
10.0%
26.2%
3.1%
57.8%
4.0%
3.5%
19.4%
4- 7°/
8.0%
ZONE 4 MEAN 26.2%
5
5
WA9
WA9
117e
120e
Common Rye
Dalmation Toadflax
SUM
Poa bulbosa
Crested Wheatgrass
Ragweed
Thistle
Species J
SUM
75.0%
75.0%
1.0%
T
0.5%
1.0%
2.5%
60.0%
5.0%
65.0%
1.0%
0.5%
0.5%
2.0%
80.0%
80.0%
1.0%
4.0%
1.0%
6.0%
30.0%
30.0%
0.5%
2.0%
0.5%
3.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.5%
0.5%
2.0%
3.0%
100.0%
40.0%
T
20.0%
40.0%
92.3%
7.7%
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
100.0%
16.7%
66.7%
16.7%
100.0%
16.7%
66.7%
16.7%
100.0%
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
59.0%
5.0%
60.0%
0.8%
1.8%
1.0%
0.5%
1.0%
3.3%
98.5%
1.5%
28.0%
43.8%
24.0%
5.0%
8.0%
T = Trace
ZONE 5 MEAN 31.7%
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX D-2
Plant Inventory and Cover Determination - July 2003
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Zone
Work
Area
Location
Common Name
% Coverage
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S
Quadrat W
% Composition
Quadrat 1
Quadrat N
Quadrat E
Quadrat S
Quadrat W
MEAN
% Cover
% Comp
Ref
Ref
Ref
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM-A
BLM-D
BLM-E
Red three awn
Broom Snakeweed
Poa bulbosa
Bromus tectorum
Perennial Grass
SUM
Red three awn
Species I
Curlycup Gumweed
Poa bulbosa
Ragweed
SUM
Red three awn
Ragweed
Poa bulbosa
Species I
Perennial grass
SUM
4.0%
20.0%
1.0%
1.0%
26.0%
20.0%
40.0%
T
60.0%
5.0%
1.0%
T
10.0%
T
16.0%
10.0%
10.0%
1.0%
21.0%
8.0%
16.0%
1.0%
25.0%
5.0%
2.0%
14.0%
21.0%
7.0%
13.0%
1.0%
21.0%
5.0%
25.0%
0.5%
30.5%
7.0%
1.0%
2.0%
10.0%
1.0%
1.0%
2.0%
4.0%
30.0%
6.0%
T
1.0%
37.0%
6.0%
2.0%
2.0%
10.0%
8.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.5%
11.5%
17.0%
30.0%
T
1.0%
48.0%
6.0%
3.0%
1.0%
10.0%
15.4%
76.9%
3.8%
3.8%
33.3%
66.7%
T
31.3%
6.3%
T
62.5%
T
47.6%
47.6%
4.8%
32.0%
64.0%
4.0%
23.8%
9.5%
66.7%
33.3%
61.9%
4.8%
16.4%
82.0%
1.6%
70.0%
10.0%
20.0%
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
81.1%
16.2%
T
2.7%
60.0%
20.0%
20.0%
69.6%
17.4%
8.7%
4.3%
35.4%
62.5%
T
2.1%
60.0%
30.0%
10.0%
7.3%
9 2%
1.0%
2.0%
0.8%
16.7%
16.0%
23.4%
T
0.8%
1.0%
40.1%
5.8%
1.8%
T
5.8%
T
13.4%
33.2%
45.8%
9.4%
10.0%
1.6%
39.6%
58.3%
2.8%
0.4%
49.0%
15.2%
35.8%
T = Trace
REFERENCE BLM MEAN 23.4%
Page 3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX D-3
Plant Biomass Determination - July 2003
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Shaded values are based on measured values; other biomass values are estimated
Zone
Ref
Ref
Ref
Work
Area
BLM
BLM
BLM
Location
BLM-A
BLM-D
BLM-E
Common Name
Bulbous Bluegrass
Cheat Grass
Red Three-Awn
Perennial Grass
Broom Snakeweed
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Red three-awn
Species I
Curlycup Gumweed
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Red Three-awn
Cheat grass
Perennial grass
Species I
Ragweed
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Plant Biomass (g/m )
Quadrat 1
7
16
5
79
58
106
164
5
84
27
30
116
146
8
16
16
1
39
5
174
85
259
Quadrat N
7
29
58
30
94
124
7
16
88
36
111
146
5
29
58
3
391
94
486
Quadrat E
7
29
42
30
79
109
5
29
27
30
61
91
57
22
12
0
113
91
204
Quadrat S
13
32
3
55
48
103
7
111
27
0
169
145
314
16
70
3
3
175
91
266
Quadrat W
7
29
29
12
113
78
191
4
94
102
156
200
356
43
22
3
12
58
80
138
MEAN
8
32
26
17
39
57
81
138
6
67
54
0
84
127
211
9
43
20
1
23
4
182
88
270
BLM Living Mean 99
BLM Total Mean 206
1
1
WAI
WAS
2
50
Bulbous Bluegrass
Cheat grass
Species I
Ragweed
Bindweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Dalmation Toadflax
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Bluebunch Wheatgrass
Tall Wheatgrass
Mule's Ear
Annual Forb (D)
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
43
63
58
42
12
3
113
221
334
16
7
149
3
58
174
232
5
63
58
3
3
58
58
189
246
11
240
169
251
420
43
10
27
3
3
58
86
143
29
7
118
58
155
213
12
21
35
9
20
72
97
169
7
88
30
95
125
7
10
27
12
3
27
113
86
200
29
84
40
113
153
22
34
41
14
11
6
29
83
136
218
20
7
11
136
3
71
158
229
Zone 1 Living Mean 147
Zone 1 Total Mean 224
Plant Community Data Details.xls, Jul2003_Veg Biomass
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX D-3
Plant Biomass Determination - July 2003
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Shaded values are based on measured values; other biomass values are estimated
Zone
2
2
2
2
Work
Area
WAS
WAS
WAS
WA6
Location
23
24
27
56
Common Name
Tall Wheatgrass
Poa bulbosa
Crested Wheatgrass
Cheat grass
Bluebunch Wheatgrass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Clover
Red-stem Filaree
Species C (Forb)
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Tall Wheatgrass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Bluebunch Wheatgrass
Crested Wheatgrass
Cheat grass
Ragweed
Curlycup Gumweed
Red-stem Filaree
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Tall Wheatgrass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Bluebunch Wheatgrass
Milkvetch
Curlycup Gumweed
Dogbane
Gambel Oak
Dalmation Toadflax
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Tall Wheatgrass
Bluebunch Wheatgrass
D. Toadflax
Annual Forb (E)
Dogbane
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Plant Biomass (g/m )
Quadrat 1
28
4
4
4
5
1
30
46
76
45
14
1
11
38
71
109
32
5
43
37
80
70
30
70
100
Quadrat N
72
3
4
1
50
80
130
38
4
2
8
66
52
118
70
13
0
113
83
196
138
0
27
13
165
179
Quadrat E
43
1
1
35
45
80
63
4
2
7
78
76
154
47
13
5
169
65
234
138
3
225
141
366
Quadrat S
33
1
1
37
35
72
68
5
12
88
85
173
514
447
514
961
33
11
6
3
80
53
133
Quadrat W
45
5
8
2
41
60
101
32
5
20
1
119
58
177
7
9
210
3
113
229
342
252
3
169
255
424
MEAN
44
4
5
4
1
3
3
8
2
1
39
53
92
49
6
20
1
12
2
3
10
78
68
146
50
9
5
514
0
9
210
3
177
185
363
126
11
3
3
27
103
137
240
Zone 2 Living Mean 111
Zone 2 Total Mean 210
Plant Community Data Details.xls, Jul2003_Veg Biomass
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX D-3
Plant Biomass Determination - July 2003
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for International Smelting & Refining Site
Shaded values are based on measured values; other biomass values are estimated
Zone
3
3
3
Work
Area
WA8
WA8
WA8
Location
106
108
138
Common Name
Tall Wheatgrass
Bulbous Wheatgrass
Crested Wheatgrass
Ragweed
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Tall Wheatgrass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Red-stem Filaree
Annual Forb (F)
Annual Forb (G)
Dalmation Toadflax
Milkvetch
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Crested Wheatgrass
Cheat grass
Ragweed
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Plant Biomass (g/m )
Quadrat 1
57
4
19
108
80
188
11
7
0
0
58
18
76
43
24
15
58
82
139
Quadrat N
25
7
58
32
90
25
13
3
0
86
40
126
14
20
5
10
52
49
101
Quadrat E
25
7
0
58
32
89
26
7
2
16
62
51
113
13
9
58
22
80
Quadrat S
25
16
225
40
265
11
7
0
58
18
76
7
9
15
225
31
256
Quadrat W
25
16
113
40
154
20
7
0
0
42
3
86
72
158
43
6
15
58
63
121
MEAN
31
10
19
0
112
45
157
19
8
0
4
23
0
3
70
40
109
24
14
5
14
90
49
139
Zone 3 Living Mean 45
Zone 3 Total Mean 135
4
WA7
70
Bulbous Bluegrass
Cheat grass
Dalmation Toadflax
Willow
Dogbane
Perennial Shrub (H)
Hoary Cress
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
57
362
447
418
809
17
25
188
409
230
639
29
58
15
336
102
408
63
118
27
15
336
224
560
27
179
58
179
27
892
470
1362
43
40
118
103
58
179
61
484
289
756
Zone 4 Living Mean 289
Zone 4 Total Mean 756
5
5
WA9
WA9
117
120
Common Rye
Dalmation Toadflax
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
Crested Wheatgrass
Bulbous Bluegrass
Thistle
Ragweed
Annual Forb (J)
Litter
Living Biomass
Total Biomass
330
225
330
554
6
16
0
0
30
21
50
330
0
225
329
554
18
23
4
40
45
85
329
168
329
497
20
7
0
58
27
85
193
225
193
418
20
7
0
30
27
57
220
225
220
445
6
7
3
13
16
29
280
0
213
280
494
14
12
4
0
0
34
27
61
Zone 5 Living Mean 154
Zone 5 Total Mean 277
Plant Community Data Details.xls, Jul2003_Veg Biomass
6/10/2004
Page 3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX E
Plant Community Correlations with Bulk Soil and Nutrient Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
E-l Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
E-2 Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
E_CoverPage.xls
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Aluminum
C A
J.U
2 4-5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
OJ)
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
° 10-
3 0.5 -
A A
0
» y = -2E-05x + 3.037
^ R2 = 0.008
* « »
•
*
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
70% -
S3 60% -
o
" 50% -
OJ
|40%-
"
7 30% -
g
8 20% -
j»>
2 10% -
0% -
y =
0.0
«
^
-3E-06x + 0.2227
R2 = 0.0072 * *
~™~~~— — ^^^.^^^_^^^^^^^
* *^
* * *
5000.0 10000.0 15000.0 20000.0 25000.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000
o 2500 -
3
GO
| 2000 -
o> h;
S> .« 1500 -
g 0
"? 1000 -
g
o
™ 500 -
A
0
»
y = 0.0279x + 758.13
R2 = 0.0323 •
^
^» • "i
• '
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6 -j
'o ^ .
a
Dec 2002 - Average # of
O ^ to W 4^
» y = -2E-05x + 3.7089
4 • R2 = 0.0071
•
*~ t ' ;
) 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -i
g 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
GO
" 15% -
g 10% -
(N
& 5°'
o°/
it -
y = 2E-07x + 0.1347
R2 = 0.0006 *
*
^ » •
1 • * *
*
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0000
0.391
% cover
0.0000
0.396
biomass
0.0279
0.288
Dec-02
# species
0.0000
0.398
% cover
0.0000
0.470
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Antimony
2 4'5 "
a 4-0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
fi i «
o i--5
-i.o-
5 0.5 -
C
70% -
S3 60% -
g
" 50% -
|40%-
>
^ 30% -
§ 20% -
3 10% -
0
1 2
3
•5 2
1 § 1
S3 £
o
o
(N
* »
*•
^
0
500 -
000 -
500 -
000 -
500 -f ^
0
* y = 0.1018x + 2.3275 «
R2 = 0.2044 •
_^^-^
^. -— ^
»
»
*
5 10 15
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
^ y = 0.0062x + 0.1592
R2 = 0.0284
*
^
*
5.0 10.0 15.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
. y = 7.048x + 1057.3
R2 = 0.0017
•
»
5 10 15
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6 -j
'o ^ -
S,
o 4 .
Dec 2002 - Average
o ^ to w
* y = -0.0904x + 3.9175
» * R2 = 0.1353
•T-^-- _;
) 5 10 15
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -i
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
GO
•> 15% -
<;
g 10% -
(N
8 5°/
O0/
y = -0.0004x + 0.1391
R2 = 0.0012
• »
» •
* »
*
0 5 10 15
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.1018
0.070
% cover
0.0062
0.300
biomass
7.0480
0.449
Dec-02
# species
-0.0904
0.120
% cover
-0.0004
0.457
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Arsenic
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
y = -0.0027x +3.1171
R2 = 0.0505
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
20% -
10% -
o
y = 0.0016x + 0.0093
R2 = 0.6836
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0
y = 5.7032x + 452.75
R2 = 0.4017
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6 -i
•<
1 9
(N Z
I1"
A
• y = -0.0093x + 4.5295
»* R2 = 0.5144
^^"••in^^
* ^"^^-<* •
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^
•
U n i i i i i i
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
OJ
00
g 15% -
p
g 10% -
o
(N
O
Q 5%-
no/
y = -3E-06x + 0.1377
R2 = 3E-05 *
•
•*
' • *
•
•
»
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0027
0.241
% cover
0.0016
0.000
biomass
5.7032
0.013
Dec-02
# species
-0.0093
0.004
% cover
0.0000
0.493
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Barium
5.0
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
|! 2.5-
< 2.0
T) 1C
O i-J ~
8,1.0-
3 0.5-
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
20% -
10% -
0%
y = -0.0061x +3.8331
R2 = 0.2676
100 200 300 400
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 0.0013x - 0.0339
R2 = 0.4875
100.0 200.0 300.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
400.0
3000 -
o 2500 -
3
g>
| 2000 -
3 IT
u ^
g> ^ 1500 -
g £
^ 1000 -
8
° 500 -
0 -
= 5.3447x + 202.19
R2 = 0.3608 •
0
100 200 300
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
400
'^ 5 -
I1
"g 4 -
3 -
30% -
1 25% -
)
; 20% -
p
1 15% -
0%
= -0.0098x + 5.1178
R2 = 0.5816
100 200 300
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
400
y = -5E-05x +0.1452
R2 = 0.0077
100 200 300 400
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0061
0.043
% cover
0.0013
0.006
biomass
5.3447
0.019
Dec-02
# species
-0.0098
0.002
% cover
0.0000
0.393
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Beryllium
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
S3 2.5-
>
< 2.0 -
m i «
O A--5
|l.O-
5 0.5 -
0
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
g>40%-
g
7 30% -
§ 20% -
3 10% -
0
1 2
P5
1 2
July 2003 - Avera
(lb/£
4 y = -0.1234x + 2.8892
* R2 = 0.0009
»
* *
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = -O.OSOlx + 0.2358
R2 = 0.0144
•
» » »
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
500- * y = 610.82x + 732.23 .
R - 0.0388
000 -
500- .
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
g • y = -0.0966x + 3.5401
| 5 - J R2 = 0.0005
* 4 " •
2P w + w
c
O 1 - A
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -i 1
y = 0.0015x + 0.1366
| 25% - R2 = 6E-05 *
O
? 20% -
60
g 15% • * *
• **
g 10% - » *
O *
•3
QJ ro/
Q -1'0 "
On/ i
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
Jul-03 Dec-02
# species % cover biomass # species % cover
slope -0.1234 -0.0801 610.8242 -0.0966 0.0015
p value 0.463 0.355 0.270 0.474 0.490
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Cadmium
SO-,
J.U
$ 4.5 -
'o
ft 4.0 -
W
"g 3.5-
u 3.0 -
on
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
S 0.5 -
A A
u.u
c
S 60% -
o
" 50% -
§> Ana/
<3 40% -
"
7 30% -
o 20%
^ 10% -
0%
-
„
1 2
3
:L2
1 i i
^ §-
o
o
>,
3
y =
+
»
»
•. •
•
.
•
*»
3
AAA
UUU T
500 -
000 -
500 -
000 -
500 -
A
0
0.0268x + 2.4942 4
R2 = 0.0703 *
~
»
^
» »
*
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 0.0012x + 0.1748
R2 = 0.005
*
*
• ^
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 21.244x + 835.61
* R2 = 0.0779
*
*^
^-^^^^^^^^^^^^^ •
^__ •
^
»
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6 -i
'o 5 .
Average # of S
W 4^
Dec 2002 -
o ^ to
» y = -O.OOSx + 3.5792
J R2 = 0.0052
*
' .
•
) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30°/
g 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
OJ
GO
•> 15% -
g 10% -
(N
S ,„
Q 5/
O0/
y = -0.0002x + 0.1402
R2 = 0.0025 *
•
f
1 • •
V
*
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0268
0.202
% cover
0.0012
0.414
biomass
21.2435
0.190
Dec-02
# species
-0.0080
0.412
% cover
-0.0002
0.438
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Calcium
5.0 -|
4.5 -
4.0 -
3.5 -
3.0 -
2.5 -
2.0 -
1.5 -
1.0 -
0.5 -
0.0 -
y = 6E-05x + 2.5591
R2 = 0.0324
0
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
20% -
10% -
o%
= -2E-06x + 0.196
R2 = 0.001
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0
y = 0.0679x + 802.25
R2 = 0.072
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6
OJ
Is"
* 4 "
OD
|3-
r^ 2 -
Dec 200:
o K-
• y = 6E-05x + 3.233'
* * R2 = 0.0257
. —
* » #
*
) 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
§ 25% -
o
O
? 20% -
00
g 15% -
<;
g 10% -
(N
& 5°'
it -
y = -4E-0%x + 0.1523
R2 = 0.053
. «» ^
1
» *
*
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0001
0.288
% cover
0.0000
0.461
biomass
0.0679
0.200
Dec-02
# species
0.0001
0.309
% cover
0.0000
0.236
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Chromium
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
|40%-
•? 30% -
r*i
§ 20% -
^
3 10% -
o%
y = -0.0247x + 3.1628
R2 = 0.0133
10 15 20
Bulk Soil Cone (rag/kg)
25
y = 0.0003x +0.184
R2 = 9E-05
5 10 15 20 25
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000 --
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 --
y = 56.111x + 304.06
R2 = 0.1212
0 5 10 15 20
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
25
6
OJ
I5-
<+H
* 4
00
|3-
1 7 -
(N ^
O
O
(N
A
«
4* y = -0.0149x + 3.6921
R2 = 0.0041
•
•
»
*
0 5 10 15 20 25
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
§ 25% -
o
O
? 20% -
00
g 15% -
g 10% -
(N
8 w
Q -1'0 "
»
y = -lE-05x + 0.1376
R2 = 2E-06 •
^ • »
\ * • *
*
*
0 5 10 15 20 25
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0247
0.361
% cover
0.0003
0.488
biomass
56.1113
0.134
Dec-02
# species
-0.0149
0.422
% cover
0.0000
0.498
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
on
5.0 -,
2 4-5 -
! 4.0 -
•g 3.5 -
^ 3.0 -
2.5 -
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
|l.O-
5 0.5 -
0.0 -
0
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
20% -
10% -
o%
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Cobalt
y = -0.0225x + 3.0386
R2 = 0.0108
5 10 15 20
Bulk Soil Cone (rag/kg)
25
y = 0.0075x +0.1144
R2 = 0.046
5 10 15 20
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
25
3000 --
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 --
= 54.551x + 553.94
R2 = 0.1117
0 5 10 15 20
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
25
6 -j
OJ
I5-
Average # of
W 4^
Dec 2002 -
o ^ to
• y = -0.0224x + 3.7035
»* R2 = 0.0089
»
'
*
) 5 10 15 20 25
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -1
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
•> 15% -
g 10% -
(N
8 =o
Q 5/
y = 0.0031x + 0.1068
R2 = 0.1002 *
J^ *~~
. *
*
0 5 10 15 20 25
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0225
0.374
% cover
0.0075
0.252
biomass
54.5511
0.144
Dec-02
# species
-0.0224
0.385
% cover
0.0031
0.158
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Copper
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
y = 0.0003x + 2.7219
R2 = 0.0167
500 1000 1500
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
2000
70% - -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
40%-
20% -
10% -
o%
y = 7E-05x +0.1675
R2 = 0.032
500 1000 1500
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
2000
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0
y = 1.001x +779.84
R2 = 0.3176
500 1000 1500
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
2000
6 -j
OJ
I5-
* 4 "
OJ)
|3-
Dec 2002 - f
o ^ to
» y = -0.0002x + 3.5582
>* R2 = 0.0088
^
»*
»
) 500 1000 1500 2000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -1
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
•> 15% -
<;
g 10% -
(N
8 =o
Q 5/
y = -4E-05x + 0.1487
* R2 = 0.1158
^r — — -
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0003
0.344
% cover
0.0001
0.289
biomass
1.0010
0.028
Dec-02
# species
-0.0002
0.386
% cover
0.0000
0.140
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Iron
5.0 -|
4.5 -
4.0 -
3.5 -
3.0 -
2.5 -
2.0 -
1.5 -
1.0 -
0.5 -
0.0 -
0
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
40%-
20% -
10% -
0%
0
y = -lE-05x + 2.9907
R2 = 0.0034
3000
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 -
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = lE-OSx - 0.0102
R2 = 0.1711
5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (rag/kg)
y = 0.0813x-171.87
R2 = 0.3204
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
25000
6 -j
OJ
a5'
* 4
00
|3-
Dec 2002 -
o ^ to
«
£
>|>_i^
y = -O.OOOlx + 5.2562 -^ «*
R2 = 0.301 » ^~*^»-^._
• ^*»
*
) 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
•> 15% -
<;
g 10% -
(N
8 5°/
O0/
y = -lE-06x + 0.1573 *
R2 = 0.0219
** r . * -
* .
*
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0000
0.428
% cover
0.0000
0.091
biomass
0.0813
0.028
Dec-02
# species
-0.0001
0.032
% cover
0.0000
0.323
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Lead
5.0
2 4-5
I 4.0
w
"g 3.5
* 3.0
I 2.5
< 2.0
g 1.5
3 0.5 -I
70% -
S3 60% -
o
^ 50% -
OJ
§"40%-
g
7 30% -
§ 20% -
3 10% -
o%
y = 0.0004x +2.4011
R2 = 0.1809
1000
2000 3000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
4000
5000
y = 2E-05x +0.1714
R2 = 0.012
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000 -
o 2500 -
3
| 2000 -
I | 1500 -
S3 £
"? 1000 -
g
° 500 -
0
y = 0.0276x +1061.2
R2 = 0.0017
* •
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6
OJ
Is"
* 4 "
bo
|3-
r^ 2 -
o
o
(N
A
«
»* y = -0.0003x + 3.791
R2 = 0.0834
I 1 «
• ** T — —
•
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
OJ
00
g 15% -
g 10% -
(N
0
Q 5%-
»
y = -3E-07x + 0.1377
• R2 = 4E-05
» •
\ *
*
^
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0004
0.084
% cover
0.0000
0.368
biomass
0.0276
0.450
Dec-02
# species
-0.0003
0.181
% cover
0.0000
0.492
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Magnesium
5.0 -|
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
•g 3.5 -
* 3.0 -
on
S3 2.5-
>
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
8
£ i.o-
3 0.5-
A A
\
•
• •
•
0 1000 2000 3000
•
»
y = 6E-05x + 2.6242
R2 = 0.0057
4000 5000 6000 7000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
70% -
S3 60% -
r }
£ 50% -
OJ
g>40%-
"
7 30% -
m
§ 20% -
j»>
5 10% -
0% -
•
•
•
1
» %
•
• •
0 1000 2000 3000
y = -lE-OSx + 0.2229
R2 = 0.0068
•
^ ^_— ^^
•
•
4000 5000 6000 7000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
QAAA
o 2500 - •
3
| 2000 -
i— 1 ^
v $ *
g> J3 1500 -
o3 £
*? 1000 - ^ — "
m ^******^
o i***^
o *
- 500 - ,
a •
Q
y = 0.2061x + 417.34
R2 = 0.1239 *
^**>
^**
• ^^^"^
•---*****
^^^
»
^
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6 -i
QJ
I5'
* * "
u
00
|3-
r^ 2 -
Dec 200
o ^
• y = -2E-05x + 3.5326
• R2 = 0.0003
»
; ; "»
*
) 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -1
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
" 15% -
<;
g 10% -
(N
8 =o
Q 5/
y = -8E-06x + 0.1635
R2 = 0.051
*
. J^— ^
• * * '
*
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0001
0.408
% cover
0.0000
0.399
biomass
0.2061
0.131
Dec-02
# species
0.0000
0.478
% cover
0.0000
0.240
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
5.0
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
I 2.5-
< 2.0
T) 1C
O i-J ~
^i.o-
3 0.5-
70% -
50% -
OJ
|40%-
•? 30% -
r*i
§ 20% -
^
^ 10% -
0%
Chemical: Manganese
y = -0.0004x + 3.0466
R2 = 0.0178
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
y = 0.0002x +0.1038
R2 = 0.0925
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0
y = 0.8423x +621.67
R2 = 0.1311
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
6 -
s-
era
W
0%
y = -0.0003x + 3.6395
R2 = 0.0069
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
y = 6E-05x + 0.1052
R2 = 0.1699
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0004
0.339
% cover
0.0002
0.168
biomass
0.8423
0.124
Dec-02
# species
-0.0003
0.399
% cover
0.0001
0.091
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Mercury
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
M
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
T) 1C
o 1-3 "
|l.O-
5 0.5 -
A A
u.u
0
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
|40%-
"
^ 30% -
§ 20% -
>?
2 10% -
0%
0
•
1 2
3
1 2
,
g
:
»
^ ^
•
0
—
•
A
0
000
500 -
000 -
500 -
000 -
-.—
500 -^
»
A
0.0
* »
»
—
^^ •
• »
»
y = 0.3917x + 2.5589
R2 = 0.0393
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
* y = 0.0601x + 0.1492
R2 = 0.0351
«
• •
^^- '
*
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
* y = 588.03x + 704.19
R2 = 0.156
^ •
^^~^^
•m-"""^
^
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6 -i
OJ
I5"
=2 4
CJ)
o>
Dec 2002 - i
o ^ to
O 1 ! 1
^ * y = -0.4813x + 3.8001
* R2 = 0.0499
^
; ^r ^L.
*
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
•> 15% -
g 10% -
(N
8 =o
Q 5/
O0/
* y = -0.0134x + 0.1462
R2 = 0.0223
*
-*
*
1
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.3917
0.268
% cover
0.0601
0.280
biomass
588.0344
0.102
Dec-02
# species
-0.4813
0.243
% cover
-0.0134
0.322
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Nickel
5.0
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
I 2.5-
< 2.0
T) \ c
O i--5 "
^i.o-
3 0.5-
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
40%-
20% -
10% -
0%
0
y = 0.054x +2.1313
R2 = 0.067
5 10 15 20
Bulk Soil Cone (rag/kg)
25
3000 --
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 --
0
y = -0.0054x + 0.2575
R2 = 0.0256
5 10 15 20
Bulk Soil Cone (rag/kg)
25
y = 35.762x + 637.23 •
R2 = 0.0518
10 15
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
20
25
6 -j
OJ
I5-
* 4 "
oj
00
|3-
Dec 2002 - f
o ^ to
• y = -0.0024x + 3.514
* » R2 = 0.0001
»
* ~, *
»
) 5 10 15 20 25
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
g 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
•> 15% -
g 10% -
(N
8 =o
Q 5/
• y = -0.0012x + 0.1524
R2 = 0.0156
—^. **
• * *
*
0 5 10 15 20 25
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0540
0.208
% cover
-0.0054
0.310
biomass
35.7617
0.238
Dec-02
# species
-0.0024
0.487
% cover
-0.0012
0.349
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Potassium
5.0
S3 4.5 -
I 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
I 2.5-
< 2.0
T) 1C
O I--5 "
^i.o-
3 0.5-
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
20% -
10% -
0%
-0.0001x + 3.1761
R2 = 0.0217
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 6E-06x +0.1721
R2 = 0.0018
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 -
y = 0.2183x +477.55
» R2 = 0.1113 *
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6
i5-
<4H
o 4 _
00
S3-
1 2 -
o
o
(N
0 -
(
• *
•
^» *
y = -6E-05x + 3.638
* R2 = 0.0034
) 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -1
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
•> 15% -
g 10% -
(N
& 5°'
o°/
it -
y = 2E-06x + 0.1308
R2 = 0.0035 *
*
^ • »
— ^ • »
» *
*
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0001
0.324
% cover
0.0000
0.448
biomass
0.2183
0.145
Dec-02
# species
-0.0001
0.429
% cover
0.0000
0.427
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Selenium
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
a 4-0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
^ 1.0 -
3 0.5 -
0
70% -
S3 60% -
g
£ 50% -
OJ
§"40%-
>
^ 30% -
8 20% -
3 10% -
0
1 2
3
•5 2
II 1
g c-
July 2003
0
0
500
000
500
000
500
* »
•'— — - — — — "
* *
• y = 0.2678x + 2.4585
R2 = 0.0747
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
^ y = 0.036x + 0.1406
R2 = 0.0513
*
• .
' |
^
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 158.26x + 879.51
R2 = 0.046 • *
-
*
• _4 •
V
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6 -
Is
S3-
o 1 -
y = -0.5304x +4.1927
R2 = 0.2462
0.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3.0
30% -
25% -
20% -
15% -
10% -
O
;N
| 5%-
0%
y = -0.0102x +0.151
R2 = 0.0525
0.5
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3.0
3.5
3.5
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.2678
0.195
% cover
0.0360
0.240
biomass
158.2567
0.252
Dec-02
# species
-0.5304
0.050
% cover
-0.0102
0.237
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Silver
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
T) 1C
0 i-J ~
S 1.0-
3 0.5-
c
70% -
S3 60% -
1 50% -
|40%-
g
7 30% -
§ 20% -
3 10% -
1 2
«
1 2
u 2
bfl 9 1
July 2003 - Avera
(lb/£
•
»
•
• •
»
4
— •
•
*
3
500 -
000 -
000
500 -
(
•
•
•
_-^
•
•
* y = 0.0944x + 2.4742
* R2 = 0.0965
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 0.0111x + 0.1487
* R2 = 0.0502
•
-r^-: — .
•
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = 26.585x + 994.78
* R2 - 0 0135
•
• _
i *
) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
6
OJ •
Is" *
g 2"
o
(N
8 1 - * y = -0.1486x + 4.0223
Q R2 = 0.2009
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30%
y = -0.0013x + 0.142
| 25% - • R2 = 0.0083
O
? 20% -
CJ)
g 15% - 1 *
; *• » •
g 10% - »
o *
(N
8 w
Q -1'0 "
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
Jul-03 Dec-02
# species % cover biomass # species % cover
slope 0.0944 0.0111 26.5854 -0.1486 -0.0013
p value 0.163 0.242 0.360 0.072 0.389
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Sodium
5.0
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
|! 2.5-
< 2.0
fi i «
O L-J
|l.O-
5 0.5 -
0.0
y = -0.0084x + 3.6173
R2 = 0.0906
0
70% -
60% -
S3
§ 50%-
^ 40% -
g 30% -
m 20% -
2, 10% -
0% -
-10% -
50 100 150
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
200
y = 0.0032x-0.115
R2 = 0.4951
50
100
150 200
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 -
y = 13.453x -197.94
R2 = 0.4142
0
50 100 150
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
200
6 -
Is-
S3-
o 1 -
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
O
;N
5 5%
0%
y = -0.0116x +4.5918
R2 = 0.146
50 100 150
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
200
y = 0.0004x + 0.0988
R2 = 0.1028
50 100 150
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
200
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0084
0.171
% cover
0.0032
0.005
biomass
13.4527
0.012
Dec-02
# species
-0.0116
0.110
% cover
0.0004
0.155
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
5.0
S3 4.5 -
I 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
I 2.5-
< 2.0
T)
1.0 -
0.5 -
70% -
50% -
OJ
|40%-
•? 30% -
r*i
§ 20% -
^
^ 10% -
0%
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Thallium
y = -0.6467x +3.5637
R2 = 0.08
0.5
1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
2.5
y = 0.2995x-0.1572
R2 = 0.6511
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
2.5
3000
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 -
y = 1517.3x-661.51
R2 = 0.7762
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
2.5
6 -j
OJ
Is"
<4H
00
|3-
g 2"
o
(N
iS X"
0
30°/
§ 25°/
o
O
^ 20°/
00
g 15°/
IIOT
(N
8 so
Q 5/
0
6 -
6 -
6 -
6 -
0
* y = -1.2525x + 4.9302
* R2 = 0.2522
•^T^^-^
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
y = -0.0247x + 0.1659
R2 = 0.0566
»^~^__^_»^
* *
[
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.6467
0.187
% cover
0.2995
0.001
biomass
1517.2729
0.000
Dec-02
# species
-1 .2525
0.048
% cover
-0.0247
0.228
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Vanadium
5.0
2 4-5 -
I 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
I 2.5-
< 2.0
T) 1C
O i--5 "
^i.o-
3 0.5-
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
20% -
10% -
0%
y = -0.0088x + 3.0122
R2 = 0.0052
10 20 30
Bulk Soil Cone (rag/kg)
40
y = 0.0009x +0.1688
R2 = 0.0021
10 20 30 40
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
3000 --
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 --
y = 15.049x + 755.28
R2 = 0.0271
0
10 20 30
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
40
6 -j
OJ
I5-
Average # of £
W 4^
Dec 2002 -
o ^ to
«
• * y = -0.0096x + 3.6979J
R2 = 0.0053
. *•
»
) 10 20 30 40
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
§ 25% -
o
O
^ 20% -
00
•> 15% -
g 10% -
(N
8 =o
Q 5/
y = 0.0015x + 0.1032 *
R2 = 0.0776
• ^^_J •*—
1 *
*
0 10 20 30 40
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-0.0088
0.412
% cover
0.0009
0.444
biomass
15.0495
0.304
Dec-02
# species
-0.0096
0.411
% cover
0.0015
0.190
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: Zinc
5.0 -|
4.5 -
4.0 -
3.5 -
3.0 -
2.5 -
2.0 -
1.5 -
1.0 -
0.5 -
0.0 -
0.0007x + 2.5292
R2 = 0.0585
0
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
j 20% -
! 10% -
o%
y = 9E-05x +0.151
R2 = 0.0383
0
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
5 O
<; ^
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0
y = 1.2014x + 605.25
R2 = 0.2946
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
6 -
OJ
1
* 4"
00
S3-
y = -0.0004x + 3.6486
R2 = 0.0162
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
30% -
g 25% -
o
O
? 20% "
00
g 15% -
<;
g 10% -
y = -4E-05x +0.1519
R2 = 0.0719
500 1000
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
1500
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.0007
0.224
% cover
0.0001
0.271
biomass
1.2014
0.034
Dec-02
# species
-0.0004
0.347
% cover
0.0000
0.200
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-l
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Chemical: pH
5.0
8 4.5 -
I 4.0 -
w
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
I 2.5-
< 2.0
T) 1C
O !••> ~
^i.o-
3 0.5-
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
OJ
40%-
20% -
10% -
0%
0
3000 --
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 --
0
y = 0.5925x-1.1489
R2 = 0.1217
10
Bulk Soil Cone (rag/kg)
y = -0.0793x + 0.7196
R2 = 0.0828 »
» »
» • •
4 6
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
10
y = -297.95x +3085.5
R2 = 0.0542
4 6
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
10
6 -j
OJ
a5'
* 4 "
OJ)
|3-
Dec 2002 - f
o ^ to
•
y = 0.3052x+ 1.4404 *
R2 = 0.0271
*~t'
*
) 2 4 6 8 10
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
30% -
g 25% -
o
O
t 20% "
00
•> 15% -
g 10% -
(N
8 =o
Q 5/
y = -0.0081x + 0.1919
R2 = 0.0112 »
«» ^
* *•
*
0 2 4 6 8 10
Bulk Soil Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
0.5925
0.133
% cover
-0.0793
0.182
biomass
-297.9518
0.233
Dec-02
# species
0.3052
0.304
% cover
-0.0081
0.372
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (bulk correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
^ 3.5-
~ 3.0 -
2.5 -
2.0 -
1.5 -
1.0 -
0.5 -
on
70% -
S3 60% -
g
# 50% -
|40%-
I
; 30% -
r^
§ 20% -
>?
3 10% -
o%
Copper (mg/kg)
y = -0.0004x +2.8325
R2 = 0.0005
50
100 150 200
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
250
y = 0.0005x +0.1691
R2 = 0.0301
0 50 100 150 200
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
250
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0
y = 8.204 lx +767.13
R2 = 0.3791
0 50 100 150 200
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
250
1 5'° "
* 4'° "
|3.0-
N 2.0 -
8
(N
s i.o-
y = -0.0013x +3.5355
R2 = 0.0047
50
100 150
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
200
0%
y = -0.0004x +0.1512
R2 = 0.1907
50
100 150
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
200
250
250
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-4.0E-04
0.472
% cover
5.0E-04
0.295
biomass
8.2E+00
0.017
Dec-02
# species
-1.3E-03
0.416
% cover
-3.5E-04
0.078
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Iron (mg/kg)
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
y = -0.0197x + 3.3834
R2 = 0.2513
70% -
S3 60% -
g
* 50% -
|40%-
I
; 30% -
r*i
§ 20% -
>?
3 10% -
y = 0.0049x + 0.0487
R2 = 0.5826
20
40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0
y = 14.047x + 686.64
R2 = 0.2257
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
120
0 20 40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
120
* 4'° "
a
|! 3.0-
N 2.0 -
8
(N
s i.o-
y = -0.0258x + 4.2259
R2 = 0.3626
20
40 60 80
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
100
120
30% -
1 25% -
i
: 20% -
j>
: 15% -
! 10% -
i
; s%-
0%
y = -7E-05x +0.1396
R2 = 0.0018
20
40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
120
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-2.0E-02
0.048
% cover
4.9E-03
0.002
biomass
1.4E+01
0.059
Dec-02
# species
-2.6E-02
0.019
% cover
-7.5E-05
0.448
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Manganese (mg/kg)
5.0 -|
S3 4.5 -
a 4.0 -
"g 3.5-
* 3.0 -
on
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
^ 1.0 -
a 0.5 -
0.0 -
c
^ •
•
/
* » •
y = -0.0136x + 2.9874 •
R2 = 0.0049
5 10 15 20 25
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
70% -
S3 60% -
g
* 50% -
|40%-
>
^ 30% -
§ 20% -
a 10% -
0% -
y = 0.0146x + 0.0057 *
R2 = 0.2134
*
^^,
• • ^-**"****""""^
^^^^'^
**• — ** •
• +
3 5 10 15 20 25
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
3
1 2
3
500 - * »
y = 22.33x + 811.88
| 2000- R2 = 0.0231
>-J 'a?
| 1 150° " •
* 1000- . [
O
3, 500- ft ». |
a
f
0 5 10 15 20 25
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
* 4-°"
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Nitrate-Nitrogen (mg/kg)
5.0 -|
S3 4.5 -
I 4.0 -
^ 3.5-
* 3.0 -
1.0 -
0.5 -
0.0
0
70% -
50% -
40%-
I
7 30% -
20% -
?
10% -
o%
0
y = 1.1257x- 1.0483
R2 = 0.1131
1234
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
y = 0.0937x-0.1329
R2 = 0.0297
1234
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
3000
2500
2000 -
1500
1000
500
0
y = 922.23x-2075.1
R2 = 0.1338
1234
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
6.0 -j
S3
1 5'° "
"8 4.0 -
8)
S3 3.0-
N 2.0 -
0
(N
8 1.0-
Q
0.0 -
0
* »
^
* *
y = -0.2514x + 4.3466
R2 = 0.0047
12345
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
30%
g 25%
^ 20%
M)
g 15%
g 10%
(N
& 5%
0%
y = -0.0023x + 0.1453 •
R2 = 0.0002
• * 1
**»*
*
012345
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
1.1E+00
0.143
% cover
9.4E-02
0.296
biomass
9.2E+02
0.121
Dec-02
# species
-2.5E-01
0.416
% cover
-2.3E-03
0.481
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Potassium (mg/kg)
5.0
S3 4.5
I 4.0
^ 3.5
* 3.0
1.0
0.5
70% -
50% -
40%-
I
7 30% -
20% -
?
10% -
o%
= 0.0011x + 2.59
R2 = 0.0071
100 200 300
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
400
y = 0.0004x +0.1044
R2 = 0.0373
100 200 300
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
400
g &
<
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
0 -
y = 3.047x +470.11
R2 = 0.0939
0
100 200 300
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
400
6.0 -,
S3
1 5'° "
* 4'° "
a
S3 3.0-
N 2.0 -
(N
8 1.0-
Q
0.0 -
0
*
V *
» y = O.OOOSx + 3.3144
R2 = 0.0033
100 200 300 400
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
30%
g 25%
? 20%
8>
g 15%
g 10%
O
(N
& 5%
0%
y = 0.0002x + 0.0878 »
R2 = 0.1655
•
*^^ * """"""
\
0 100 200 300 400
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
1.1E-03
0.397
% cover
4.1E-04
0.274
biomass
3.0E+00
0.166
Dec-02
# species
8.3E-04
0.430
% cover
2.4E-04
0.095
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Phosphorous (mg/kg)
5.0 -|
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
^ 3.5-
o 3.0 -
M
S3 2.5-
>
< 2.0 -
o 1-5 -
" 1.0 -
J^i
5 0.5 -
A A
u.u
c
7flQ/
/UTO ~
S3 60% -
r_)
^ 50% -
OJ
§>40%-
"
•? 30% -
m
§ 20% -
jS>
5 10% -
0%
',
1 2
3
1 2
i— J ^
o £
S-5 1
S3 -^
> O
": i
m
o
o
(N
>-.
3
—
3
000
500
000
500
000
500
A
u
•
•
•
•
* ^^-^^^•^^^^^^^^^
-
•
•
•
y = 0.0198x + 2.3529
R2 = 0.0147
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
•
y = 0.0027x + 0.1262
J •
R2 = 0.0102
•
•
1 » »
• •
» » »
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
» »
y = 50.198x- 85.954
R2 = 0.1668
•
-
* ^^nn**"
•»
^^^^^
^^^^^^
^^^^ *
* •
•
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
6.0 -,
S3
8 5.0 -
OH
* 4'° "
|3.0-
N 2.0 -
(N
8 1-0-
Q
0
g 25%
? 20%
Si
g 15%
g 10%
(N
S 5%
•
•
•
• y = 0.004x + 3.3893
R2 = 0.0005
5 10 15 20 25 30 3
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
»
y = -8E-05x + 0.1392
R2 = 0.0001 »
^ •»
* » •
*
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 3
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
5
5
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
2.0E-02
0.354
% cover
2.7E-03
0.378
biomass
5.0E+01
0.094
Dec-02
# species
4.0E-03
0.472
% cover
-7.7E-05
0.487
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Sulfate-Sulfur (mg/kg)
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
^ 3.5-
* 3.0 -
OJ)
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
o
>> 1.0 -
3 0.5 -
A A
J
• * *
• y = -0.0019x
• R2 = O.C
0 20 40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
+ 2.8656
039
120 140
70% -
S3 60% -
o
^ 50% -
OJ
|40%-
"
^ 30% -
g
8 20% -
3 10% -
0% -
,
^
y = -O.OOOSx +
0.2087
* * R2 = 0.0247 1
^ .
» »
0 20 40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
*
120 140
3000
o 2500 - t
3
| 2000 -
3 ^"^
a> | i5oo- * y = -3.0007x + 1167.7 |
§ £ * R2 =
"f 1000 -
g
o *
N 500 - • ^
A
0 20 40 60 80 100
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
0.017
-
»
120 140
6.0 -,
S3
1 5'° "
* 4'° "
8)
1 3.0-
Dec 2002 - A
o ^ to
o o o
•* #
•
* 4
y = -0.0019x + 3.5323
R2 = 0.0033
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
30%
g 25%
? 20%
8>
g 15%
o 10%
(N
& 5%
0%
•
y = 2E-06x + 0.1374
* R2 = 2E-06
« •
'* .*
*
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-1 .9E-03
0.423
% cover
-7.8E-04
0.313
biomass
-3.0E+00
0.343
Dec-02
# species
-1.9E-03
0.429
% cover
1.7E-06
0.498
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Zinc (mg/kg)
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
^ 3.5-
* 3.0 -
OJ)
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
o
^ L0 "
3 0.5 -
A A
* •
» * «
• y = -0.0012x + 2.8944
0
• R -0
50 100 150
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
0058
200 250
70% -
S3 60% -
o
^ 50% -
OJ
§"40%-
1
; 30% -
o 20%
3 10% -
0% -
,
^
y = O.OOOlx
+ 0.182
R2 = 0.0017 1
*
0
•
• *»
^
50 100 150
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
*
200 250
3000
o 2500
3
op
| 2000
3 •?
u ^;
g>-5 1500
g G-
"? 1000
g
o
^ 500
t
• y = 3.2713x+*75.53
R2 =
-
« ^
• *— • — ' —
• .
:
0 50 100 150
0.0793
, '
200 250
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
S3
1 5'° "
5 4.0 -
_ 3.0 -
s 2.0 -
N
s i.o-
0%
y = 0.0032x + 3.2706
R2 = 0.0368
50
100 150
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
200
250
y = -0.0001x +0.1458
R2 = 0.0327
50
100 150
Soil Nutrient Cone (mg/kg)
200
250
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
-1 .2E-03
0.407
% cover
l.OE-04
0.450
biomass
3.3E+00
0.188
Dec-02
# species
3.2E-03
0.275
% cover
-1 .3E-04
0.287
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Organic Matter (% of total)
s n -*-
J.U
8 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
w
^H ^ 5 -
O ^.D
*
o 3.0 -
00
S3 2.5-
>
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
° 10 -
>-. 1-u
3 0.5-
A A
y = 32.595x + 1.9149 » *
R2 = 0.0685 »
—
+ ^^^^^^^^^^
^^^"^^^^"^^ •
"
+
• »
»
•
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Organic Matter (% of total)
70% -
S3 60% -
1 50% -
OJ
§>40%-
"
•? 30% -
0
8 20% -
P*-i
3 10% -
An/
y = 5.3331x + 0.0412
R2 = 0.0696 *
•
* "*
^^^^^~^^
^^^0^^^^ A
^^ * •
• »
» • »
UTO ~i 1 1 1 1 1
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Organic Matter (% of total)
3000 -i
1 y = 46341x - 190.9
I 2500 - R2 = 0.2439 » *
3
op
•5 2000 -
'£'£ • ^^^
g> .8 1500 - ^^
i> c- »^^^^ »
"f 1000 - .^^
o ^^^^
o ^^ ^
^ 500 - • »»
^ * •
a •
A
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Organic Matter (% of total)
/: A
O.U T
S3
1 5'° "
0 4.0 -
M
1 3.0-
<
^ 2.0 -
(N
8 1-0 -
Q
A A
y = 32.911x + 2.5728 »
R2 = 0.0587 * »
-
^
^^^-i*"^^^^^* *
" * *
*
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Organic Matter (% of total)
30%
g 25%
3
°o 20%
Si
g 15%
<
8 10%
o
(N
o
Q 5%
0%
y = 1.6052x + 0.093
R2 = 0.0808
** • "~
t^
• ^
•
^
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%
Organic Matter (% of total)
Jul-03 Dec-02
# species % cover biomass # species % cover
slope 3.3E+01 5.3E+00 4.6E+04 3.3E+01 1.6E+00
p value 0.206 0.204 0.051 0.224 0.185
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX E-2
Correlation of Plant Community Metrics with Soil Nutrient Concentrations
Salinity - Ece (dS/m)
5.0 -,
S3 4.5 -
! 4.0 -
•g 3.5 -
* 3.0 -
00
1 2.5-
< 2.0 -
g 1.5 -
3 0.5 -
A A
»
.
0.0
.»
* y = 0.1225x + 2.7187
R2 = 0.0069
. *
» «
» * »
*
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Salinity - Ece (dS/m)
70% -
S3 60% -
o
^ 50% -
OJ
|40%-
"
^ 30% -
§ 20% -
>?
5 10% -
0% -
4
4
0.0
^
» • y = -0.0829x + 0.2551
' R2 = 0.1205
• ** ^^^^^^^
* * ^^^^^
» ?
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Salinity - Ece (dS/m)
3000
o 2500
3
| 2000
'^ IT
S-5 1500
§ o
^ 1000
g
° 500
A
u
* *
-
• y = -243. 54x + 1286
• R2 = 0.0483
^"~— — — —
• * * *
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Salinity - Ece (dS/m)
6.0 -,
S3
1 5'° "
* 4'° "
a
1 3.0-
N 2.0 -
(N
8 1.0-
Q
0.0 -
0.
* y = 0.0066x + 3.478
R2 = 2E-05
*• *" *
*
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Salinity - Ece (dS/m)
30%
g 25%
? 20%
Si
g 15%
g 10%
(N
& 5%
0%
C
•
y = 0.0006x + 0.137
* R2 = 7E-05
* • *
*
.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Salinity - Ece (dS/m)
slope
p value
Jul-03
# species
1.2E-01
0.398
% cover
-8.3E-02
0.134
biomass
-2.4E+02
0.246
Dec-02
# species
6.6E-03
0.495
% cover
5.6E-04
0.490
Soil NutrientvsBulkConc.xls (nutrient correlation figs)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX F
Wildlife Exposure Factors
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
F_Cover Page.xls
-------
American Robin
Turdus migratorius
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use
Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfood
IRwater
IRsoil
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
0.077 Mean (kg)- adults - Pennsylvania
0.086 Mean (kg)- adult male nonbreeders - New York
0.084 Mean (kg)- adult female nonbreeders - New York
0.077 Mean (kg)- adult female breeders -New York
0.081 Mean (kg)- adult male breeders - New York
0.89 Mean (g ww/g BW-day) - breeding free-living male & females - California
1 .52 Mean (g ww/g BW-day)- free-living adults - Kansas
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is
assumed to be equal to that of the American woodcock 0.104 (10.4%).
Assumes 20% dry matter in food (CF = 0.20 kg food dw / kg food ww).
Western United States:
Spring: fruit 17%; invertebrates 83%
Summer: fruit 29%; invertebrates 71%
Fall: fruit 63%; invertebrates 37%
Winter: fruit 70%; invertebrates 30%
Foraging home range from nests in summer:
0.15 Mean (ha) - adults with nestlings
0.81 Mean (ha) - adults with fledglings
Migratory in northern portion of range. Leave breeding grounds from
September to November returning from February to April.
Reference
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Beyer etal, 1994
Assumption
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
0.081
kg ww
Mean of reported means:
1.205
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR (L/day) = [0.059 *BW (kg ww) °"]/BW (kg)
0.135
L/kg BW/day
Based on fraction of soil in the diet:
IR ,011 = IRfood (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF
(dw/ww)
0.025
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFplant=50%
DFsurface invertebrate = 25%
DFsoil invertebrate = 25%
Average of reported means:
0.48
hectares
References:
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93/187a,b
Beyer, W.N, E.E. Conner, S. Gerould. 1994. Estimates of Soil Ingestion by Wildlife. J Wildl Manage 58(2):375-382.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: American Robin
6/10/2004
-------
Masked Shrew
Sorex cinereus
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfoocl
IRwater
IRsoil
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
5.1 Mean (g) of reported range 2.4-7.8 g
4.0 Mean(g) of reported range 3-5 g
5.5 Mean (g) of reported range 4-7 g
No measured values available; estimated from mammalian (rodent) allometri
equation for food ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
Assumes 32% dry matter in food (CF = 0.32 kg food dw / kg food ww).
No measured values available; estimated from mammalian allometric
equation for water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is assume
to be equal to that of the short-tailed shrew 0. 13 (13%).
Assumes 32% dry matter in food (CF = 0.32 kg food dw / kg food ww).
The masked shrew is primarily feeds on insects with beetles, flies, and ants
comprising most of their diet. Diet consists of butterflies, moths, beetle larva
slugs, snails, and spiders; seldom eat worms or vegetable matter.
0.39 Mean (ha) - Manitoba bog, males & females, short-tailed shrew
No information available.
Reference
Whitaker, 1980
Jones et al., 1985
Burt & Grossenheider,
1976
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
1 Talmage & Walton,
1993
Zeveloff, 1988
USEPA, 1993
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
0.0049
kg ww
Estimated from allometric equation (converted to ww):
IR(kgww/day) = [0.621*BW (g)0'564 ] / [CF (dw/ww) *BW
(kg) * 1000 (g/kg)]
0.97
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR(L/day) =[0.099 * BW (kg ww)0'90 ] / BW (kg)
0.17
L/kg BW/day
Based on assumed fraction of soil in the diet:
IR son = IRfood (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF
(dw/ww)
0.040
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFsurface invertebrates = 100%
Reported value:
0.39
hectares
References:
Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1976. Mammals (Peterson Field Guides) 3rd Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jones et al., 1985
Talmage, S. and B. Walton. 1993. Food chain transfer and potential renal toxicity to small mammals at a contaminated terrestrial field site. Ecotoxicology. 2:243-256.
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93/187a,b
Whitaker, J.O 1980. The Audobon Society Field Guide to North American Mammals. Published by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Chanticleer Press, Inc., New York.
Zeveloff, S.I. 1988. Mammals of the Intel-mountain West. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, Utah.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Masked Shrew
6/10/2004
-------
Deer Mouse
Peromyscus maniculatus
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Compositioi
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factoi
Symbol
BW
IRfood
IRwater
IRso.1
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
0.0220 Mean (kg) - adult males - North America
0.0200 Mean (kg) - adult females - North America
0.0157 Mean (kg) - adult males, austerus spp.
0.0148 Mean (kg) - adult females, austerus spp.
0.0223 Mean (kg) - adult males, blandus spp.
0.0211 Mean (kg) - adult females, blandus spp.
0.0196 Mean (kg) - both sexes - New Hampshire
0.0203 Mean (kg) - adult females, nonbreeding, borealus spp.
0.0315 Mean (kg) - adult females, gestation, borealus spp.
0.0245 Mean (kg) - adult females, lactation, borealus spp.
0.19 Mean (g/g BW-day) - adult females - Canada
0.18 Mean (g/g BW-day) - adult females - Canada
0.45 Mean (g/g BW-day) - lactating females - Canada
0.38 Mean (g/g BW-day) - lactating females - Canada
0.19 Mean (g/g BW-day) - nonbreeding females - Virginia lab
0.22 Mean (g/g BW-day) - nonbreeding males - Virginia lab
No measured values available; estimated from mammalian allometric equation for
water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is assumed to
be equal to that of the white-footed mouse 0.012 (1.2%).
Assumes 55% dry matter in food (CF = 0.55 kg food dw / kg food ww).
Colorado, short grass prairie:
Spring - plants/seeds 35.0%, invertebrates 58.6%
Summer - plants/seeds 39.9%, invertebrates 45.2%
Fall - plants/seeds 66.0%, invertebrates 21.7%
Winter - plants/seeds 77.1%, invertebrates 9.5%
The home range of female deer mice encompass both their foraging areas and their
nests. Male home ranges are larger and overlap those of the females.
0.039 Mean (ha) - adult males, summer, Utah subalpine meadow
0.027 Mean (ha) - adult females, summer, Utah subalpine meadow
0. 100 Mean (ha) - adult males, Oregon ponderosa pines
0.075 Mean (ha) - adult females, Oregon ponderosa pines
0. 128 Mean (ha) - adult males, Idaho desert
0.094 Mean (ha) - adult females, Idaho desert
Torpor reported in winter in northern parts of range.
Reference
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Beyer et al., 1994
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
0.021
kg ww
Average of reported means:
0.268
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR(LMay) = [0.099 * BW (kg ww) OM ] /BW (kg)
0.15
L/kg BW/day
Based on assumed fraction of soil in the diet:
IRsoii =IR food (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF
(dw/ww)
0.0018
kg dw/kg BW/day
Approximate average across all seasons:
DFplant = 50%
DFsuface invertebrates = 50%
Average of reported means:
0.077
hectares
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93/187a,b
Beyer, W.N, E.E. Conner, S. Gerould. 1994. Estimates of Soil Ingestion by Wildlife. J Wildl Manage 58(2):375-382.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Deer Mouse
6/10/2004
-------
Mule Deer
Odocoileus hemionus
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfoocl
I^water
lRsrai
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
1 10 Mean (kg) of reported range 70-150 for males
74.04 Mean (kg) Rocky Mountians, males
58.99 Mean (kg) Rocky Mountians, females
0.0219 Mean (kg dw/kg BW/day), Colorado, adults across all seasons
Assumes 53% dry matter in food (CF = 0.53 kg food dw / kg food ww).
0.0295 Mean (L/kg BW/day) of reported range 24-35, penned deer in winter
0.0585 Mean (L/kg BW/day) of reported range 47-70, penned deer in summer
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is 0.006
(0.6%).
Assumes 53% dry matter in food (CF = 0.53 kg food dw / kg food ww).
White-tailed deer are exclusively herbivores with a diverse diet dependant or
the availability of food. Major foods include buds and twigs of trees and
shrubs, grasses and forbs (summer), masts and fruits (fall).
285.3 Mean (ha) annual home range for mule deer
[similar home ranges reported seen in Utah, but no values presented]
Active year round and do not hibernate; often migrate from high mountainou
areas in the summer to lower elevations in the winter to avoid deep snow.
Reference
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample et al.,
1997
Beyer et al., 1994
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample & Suter,
' 1994
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means for both sexes:
81
kg ww
Reported value (converted to ww):
0.041
kg ww/kg BW/day
Average of reported means:
0.044
L/kg BW/day
Based on assumed fraction of soil in the diet:
IR soil = IRfood (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF
(dw/ww)
0.00013
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFplant = 100%
Reported value:
285.3
hectares
References:
Sample, B.E., M.S. Aplin, R.A. Efroymson, G.W. Suter II, C.J.E. Welsh. 1997. Methods and Tools for Estimation of the Exposure of Terrestrial Wildlife to Contaminants.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. October 1997. ORNL/TM-13391.
Beyer, W.N, E.E. Conner, S. Gerould. 1994. Estimates of Soil Ingestion by Wildlife. J Wildl Manage 58(2):375-382.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Mule Deer
6/10/2004
-------
Red Fox
Vulpes vulpes
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfood
IRwater
IRsoil
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
5.25 Mean (kg) - adult males in spring - Illinois
4. 13 Mean (kg) - adult females in spring - Illinois
4.82 Mean (kg) - adult males in fall - Iowa
3.92 Mean (kg) - adult females in fall - Iowa
0.069 Mean (g ww/g-day) - nonbreeding captive adults, North Dakota
No measured values available; estimated from mammalian allometric equatior
for water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is 0.028
(2.8%).
Assumes 27% dry matter in food (CF = 0.27 kg food dw / kg food ww).
Nebraska, winter:
mammals 77.4%, birds 19.6%, other 3.0%
Illinois, farm/woods (ranges across all seasons)
mammals 37.1% - 92.2%, birds 0.2% - 43.2%, plants 4.6% - 31.1%
Missouri (ranges across all seasons)
mammals 18.3% - 69.4%, birds 1 1.6% - 45.0%, plants 2. 1% - 6.9%
Maryland, fall & winter:
mammals 81.4%, birds 4.8%, plants 7.0%, other 6.8%
1611 Mean (ha) -adult both sexes - British Columbia
1967 Mean (ha) - adult male - British Columbia
1137 Mean (ha) - adult female - British Columbia
699 Mean (ha) - adult female - spring - Minnesota
717 Mean (ha) - adult male - Wisconsin
96 Mean (ha) - adult female - Wisconsin
No information available.
Reference
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Beyer et al., 1994
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
4.53
kg ww
Reported value:
0.069
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR(L/day) = [0.099 * BW (kg ww)a90 ] / BW (kg)
0.085
L//kg BW/day
Based on fraction of soil in the diet:
IR son = IRfood (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF (dw/ww)
0.0005
kg dw/kg BW/day
No measured data and cannot estimate concentrations in birds,
therefore mammal concentrations are used to estimate bird
concentrations.
DFmammal = 75%
DFplant = 25%
Average of reported values:
1,038
hectares
References:
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93/187a,b
Beyer, W.N, E.E. Conner, S. Gerould. 1994. Estimates of Soil Ingestion by Wildlife. J Wildl Manage 58(2):375-382.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Red Fox
6/10/2004
-------
Cliff Swallow
Petrochelidon pyrchonota
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfoocl
IRwater
IRsed
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
21.6 Mean (g) - adult males & females, California
23.9 Mean (g) - adult male during nesting, Nebraska
24. 1 5 Mean (g) - adult female during nesting, Nebraska
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
food ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
Assumes 40% dry matter in food (CF = 0.40 kg food dw / kg food ww).
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is assumed
to be 0.07 (7%) based on professional judgement. Assumption based on
burrowing behavior in the banks of rivers or streams while constructing nests
and intentional ingestion of grit to aid in digestion.
Assumes 40% dry matter in food (CF = 0.40 kg food dw / kg food ww).
Diet consists entirely of invertebrates, including flying insects, beetles,
grasshoppers, dragonflies, spiders, etc.
Most foraging will occur within a 1 . 5km to 6km radius around the population
colony.
Migatory, winters in southern US, Mexico and South America.
Reference
Sample et al.,
1997
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Assumption
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample et al.,
1997
Sample et al.,
1997
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
0.023
kg ww
Estimated from allometric equation:
IRfood (kgdw/day) = [0.0582*BW (kg)0'6" ] / [CF (dw/ww) *BW
(kz)l
0.54
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR (L/day) = [0.059 *BW(kg ww)a67 ' ] / BW (kg)
0.20
L/kg BW/day
Based on fraction of soil in the diet:
IR soil = IRfood (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF (dw/ww)
0.0151
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFaerial invertebrates = 75%
DFsurface invertebrates = 25%
no info
References:
Sample, B.E., M.S. Aplin, R.A. Efroymson, G.W. Suter II, C.J.E. Welsh. 1997. Methods and Tools for Estimation of the Exposure of Terrestrial Wildlife to Contaminants.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory. October 1997. ORNL/TM-13391.
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93/187a,b
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Cliff Swallow
6/10/2004
-------
Red-Tailed Hawk
Buteo jamaicensis
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfood
IRwater
IRsoil
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
1.224 Mean (kg) - adult male - Michigan, Pennsylvania
1.026 Mean (kg) - adult female - Michigan, Pennsylvania
1.154 Mean (kg) - adult male - SW Idaho
0.957 Mean (kg) - adult female - SW Idaho
1.235 Mean (kg) - adult male - Ohio
1 .204 Mean (kg) - adult female - Ohio
0.110 Mean (g/g BW-day) - adult female, winter, Michigan/captive outdoors
0. 100 Mean (g/g BW-day) - adult male, winter, Michigan/captive outdoors
0.086 Mean (g/g BW-day) - adult male, summer, Michigan/captive outdoors
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; assumed to be negligible.
Alberta, Canada (farm & woodlands, summer):
small mammals 73.7%, birds 26.6%
Oregon (pasture & wheat fields, spring):
small mammals 78.5%, birds 8.5%, reptiles 13.1%
California (foothills, summer):
small mammals 94.2%, birds 1.3%, reptiles 4.1%
110 Mean (ha) of reported range - adults, spring, California foothills
697 Mean (ha) - adults, winter, Michigan fields/woodlots
1770 Mean (ha) - adults, fall, Colorado upland prairie/piny on-juniper woodlands
Northerly populations are migratory while southerly populations (including thos
in Utah) are year-round residents.
Reference
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Sample and Suter,
1994
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
1.13
kg ww
Average of reported means:
0.099
kg ww/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR (L/day) = [0.059 *BW(kg ww)a67 ] / BW (kg )
0.057
L/day
Based on professional judgement:
0
kg dw/kg BW/day
No measured data and cannot estimate concentrations in birds o
reptiles, therefore diet assumed to be 100% mammals.
DFinammal = 100%
Average of reported means:
859
hectares
References:
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93/187a,b
Sample and Suter. 1994. Estimating exposure of terrestial wildlife to contaminants. ES/ER/TM-125. September 1994.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Red-Tailed Hawk
6/10/2004
-------
Big Brown Bat
Eptesicus fuscus
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfoocl
IRwater
IRsoil
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
22 Mean (g) of reported range (14-30g)
14 Mean (g) of reported range (ll-17g)
Females 5% larger than males
No measured values available; estimated from mammalian (rodent) allometri
equation for food ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
Assumes 40% dry matter in food (CF = 0.40 kg food dw / kg food ww).
No measured values available; estimated from mammalian allometric
equation for water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; as aerial insectivore assumed to be negligible.
Mostly flying insects, beetles, and infrequently moths
Estimated home range of 1 1 1 km2 (43 mi2)
Some migrate, some hibernate in Utah mines and caves.
Do not feed in winter, but depend on fat reserves for energy.
Reference
Animal Diversity website
Peterson, 1976
Collett and Zeveloff, 1988
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Sample and Suter, 1994
Collett and Zeveloff, 1988
Beer 1955
Collett and Zeveloff, 1988
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
0.018
kg ww
Estimated from allometric equation (converted to ww):
IR(g ww/day) = [0.621 *BW (g ww)a564 J / [CF (dw/ww) * BW
(kg)*1000(g/kg)l
0.44
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR(L/day) = [0.099 * BW (kg ww)a90 ] / BW (kg)
0.15
L/kg BW/day
Based on professional judgement:
0
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFaerial invertebrates = 100%
no info
References:
Animal Diversity website: http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/accounts/eptesicus/e._fuscus$narrative.html#physical_characteristics
Collett and Zeveloff, Mammals of the Intermountain West, 1988
Peterson Field Guides - Mammals 1976??
Beer, J. R. 1955. Survival and movements of banded big brown bats. J. Mammal. 36:242-248.
Sample and Suter. 1994. Estimating exposure of terrestial wildlife to contaminants. ES/ER/TM-125. September 1994.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Big Brown Bat
6/10/2004
-------
Mourning Dove
Zenaida Macroura
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfoocl
IKwater
lRsmi
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
130 Mean (g) for males
116 Mean (g) for males
123 Mean (g) for females
108 Mean (g) for females
123 Mean (g) for males, Illinois
115 Mean (g) for females, Illinois
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
food ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
Assumes 53% dry matter in food (CF = 0.53 kg food dw / kg food ww).
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is assume
to be 0.04 (4%) based on professional judgement. Assumption based on the
intentional ingestion of grit to aid in digestion.
Assumes 53% dry matter in food (CF = 0.53 kg food dw / kg food ww).
98% of adult food is seeds
No information available
Migrate south in winter
Reference
Mirarchi and
Baskett, 1994
Dunning, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Assumption
Terres, 1991
Ryser, 1985
Terres 1991
Terres 1991
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
0.119
kg ww
Estimated from allometric equation:
IRfood (kgdw/day) = [0.0582*BW (kg)0'651 ] / [CF (dw/ww)
*BW(kg)]
0.23
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR (L/day) = [0.059 *BW(kg ww)a67 ] / BW (kg )
0.12
L/day
Based on fraction of soil in the diet:
IR soii = IRfood (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF
(dw/ww)
0.0049
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFplant = 100%
no info
References:
Mirarchi, R. E. and T. S. Baskett. 1994. Mourning Dove. The Birds of North America, No. 117.
Dunning, J.B. 1993. CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Terres, 1991
Ryser, Birds of the Great Basin, 1985
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Mourning Dove
6/10/2004
-------
Mallard
Anas platyrhynchos
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Sediment
Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfoocl
IRwater
TT) soil/sed
IK
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
1.225 Mean (kg) - adult males, North America
1.043 Mean (kg) - adult females, North America
1.246 Mean (kg) - adult males in winter, Mississippi
1.095 Mean (kg) - adult females in winter, Mississippi
1.237 Mean (kg) - adult males in winter, Texas
1.088 Mean (kg) - adult females in winter, Texas
1. 197 Mean (kg) - adult females in spring, North Dakota
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
food ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
Assumes 18% dry matter in food (CF = 0.18 kg food dw / kg food ww).
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of sediment in the diet is
0.049 (4.9%).
Assumes 18% dry matter in food (CF = 0.18 kg food dw / kg food ww).
North Dakota, prairie potholes
75% total invertebrates: average in spring
25% total plants: average in spring
468 Mean (ha) - adult females, total - North Dakota, prairie potholes
111 Mean (ha) - adult females, laying - North Dakota, prairie potholes
Migratory in northern portion of range. Leave breeding grounds from
September to November returning in spring.
Reference
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Beyer et al., 1998
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
1.162
kg ww
Estimated from allometric equation:
IRfood (kgdw/day) = [0.0582*BW (kg)"'6" ] / [CF (dw/ww)
*BW(kg)]
0.31
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR (L/day) = [0.059 *BW(kg ww)°'67 ' ] / BW (kg )
0.056
L/kg BW/day
Based on fraction of sediment in the diet:
IRsoil = IR food (kg WWllkg BW/day) * sediment in diet * CF
(dw/ww)
0.0027
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFbenthics = 75%
DFplant = 25%
Average of reported means:
111
hectares
References:
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93,
Beyer, W.N, D.J. Audet, A. Morton, J.K. Campbell, and L. LeCaptain. 1998. Lead Exposure of Waterfowl Ingesting Coeur d'
/187a,b
Alene River Basin Sediments. J Environ Qual (27):1533-1538.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Mallard
6/10/2004
-------
Northern Flicker
Colaptes auratus
Parameter
Body Weight
Food Ingestion Rate
Water Ingestion Rate
Soil Ingestion Rate
Dietary Composition
(fraction wet volume)
Home Range Size
Seasonal Area Use
Factor
Symbol
BW
IRfood
IRwater
IRsoil
DF
HR
AUF
Reported Values
Adults weigh between 106g and 150g, with a mean of 140g
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
food ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated from avian allometric equation for
water ingestion provided in USEPA (1993).
No measured values available; estimated fraction of soil in the diet is assumed
to be equal to that of the American woodcock 0. 104 (10.4%).
Assumes 20% dry matter in food (CF = 0.20 kg food dw / kg food ww).
Reported home range values range from 48 to 101.
A territory size of 16 ha was reported.
Reference
Jacobs Smelter, USEPA
2003
USEPA, 1993
USEPA, 1993
Beyer et al., 1994
Assumption
Jacobs Smelter, USEPA
2003
Jacobs Smelter, USEPA
2003
Values Identified for SLERA
Average of reported means:
0.140
kg ww
Estimated from allometric equation:
IRfood (kgdw/day)=[0.0582*BW(kg)'l6"]/[CF
(dw/ww) * BW (kg)]
0.58
kg ww/kg BW/day
Estimated from allometric equation:
IR (L/day) = [0.059 *BW(kg ww)a6! ' ] / BW (kg ww)
0.113
L/kg BW/day
Based on fraction of soil in the diet:
IR son = IRfood (kg ww/kg BW/day) * soil in diet * CF
(dw/ww)
0.012
kg dw/kg BW/day
DFsurface invertebrate = 100%
Average of reported means:
16-55
hectares
References:
USEPA. 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. Office of Research and Development. December 1993. EPA/600/R-93/187a,b
Beyer, W.N, E.E. Conner, S. Gerould. 1994. Estimates of Soil Ingestion by Wildlife. J Wildl Manage 58(2):375-382.
USEPA. 2003. Jacobs Smelter Site Ecological Risk Assessment. Prepared by Lockheed Martin, 2003.
IS&R Exposure Factors.xls: Northern Flicker
11/23/2004
-------
APPENDIX G
Measured Tissue Correlations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
G-l Correlation of Measured Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
G-2 Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
G_Cover Page.xls
-------
APPENDIX G-l
Correlation of Measured Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
ALUMINUM
2 -
1 -
* measured
— ORNL predicted
- - -Kennecott predicted
6
In(soil)
10
12
slope
-0.04
int
6.03
R2
0.00
p value
0.863
Soil vs Invert Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-l
Correlation of Measured Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
ANTIMONY
4 -
3 -
2 -
i -
1
-4
-2
• measured
— ORNL predicted
- - 'Kennecott predicted
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0.5 1
In(soil)
1.5
2.5
3.5
slope
0.26
int
-1.67
R2
0.08
p value
0.194
Soil vs Invert Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-l
Correlation of Measured Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
ARSENIC
4.5 -
4 -
3.5 -
3 -
2.5 -
2 -
1.5 -
1 -
0.5 -
0
• measured
— ORNL predicted
- - 'Kennecott predicted
3
In(soil)
slope
int
R p value
0.20
1.14 0.10 0.156
Soil vs Invert Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-l
Correlation of Measured Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
CADMIUM
6
5
4
^ 3
i>
a
£ 2
1 -
-1
* measured
— ORNL predicted
- - -Kennecott predicted
0.5
1.5
2 2.5
In(soil)
3.5
4.5
slope int R p value
o.i;
2.03 0.08 0.198
Soil vs Invert Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-l
Correlation of Measured Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
LEAD
• measured
— ORNL predicted
- - 'Kennecott predicted
4 5
In(soil)
slope
mt
R
p value
0.29
1.35
0.14
0.082
Soil vs Invert Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-l
Correlation of Measured Terrestrial Invertebrate Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
SELENIUM
3 -
2 -
1 H
o -
-i -
-2
-1.5
• measured
— ORNL predicted
- - 'Kennecott predicted
-1
-0.5
0 0.5
In(soil)
1.5
slope int R p value
0.37 2.20 0.19 0.043
Soil vs Invert Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-2
Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
ALUMINUM
4.5
4
3.5
^ 3
"S
•IP
s
~ 2
1.5
1
0.5
• forb measured
ORNL predicted
— - Kennecott predicted
2 4
Forbs
k V
t«*
l£ZL
|r^^*
/"
A
/
6 8 10 12
In(soil)
6 -i —
5 -
4 -
"S
2 -
1 -
0 -
0
• grass measured
ORNL predicted
— • Kennecott predicted
2 4
•*i
6 8 10 12
In(soil)
Shrubs
4.5 -
4 -
3.5 -
3 -
"S
•f2.5 -
s
~ 2 -
1.5 -
1 -
0.5 -
0
A shrub measured
ORNL predicted i
^~ • Kennecott predicted . ^ f
f A
'
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
In(soil)
All Plant Types
6 -
5 -
4 -
"S
C3 -
a "
^
2 -
1 -
• all types measured
ORNL predicted *
^~ • Kennecott predicted
•Jl
0 -1 1 \ 1 1 i
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
In(soil)
Forb
Grass
Shrub
All
slope
-0.38
-0.32
-0.13
-0.28
int
7.19
6.68
4.94
6.27
R2
0.16
0.09
0.03
0.09
p value
0.036
0.123
0.385
0.007
Soil vs Plant Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-2
Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
ANTIMONY
0
-1
-2
Forbs
# forb measured
ORNL predicted
- - Kennecott predicted
-2
-1012
In(soil)
Grasses
grass measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
-2
1
In(soil)
Shrubs
A shrub measured
ORNL predicted
~ • Kennecott predicted
-2
0 1 2
In(soil)
1
0
-1
-2
I'3
j3*
-4
-5
-6
-7
All Plant Types
I all types measured
ORNL predicted
• Kennecott predicted
-2
In(soil)
Forb
Grass
Shrub
All
slope
-0.11
-0.07
0.29
0.04
int
-2.34
-2.64
-2.79
-2.59
R2
0.03
0.02
0.23
0.00
p value
0.374
0.473
0.012
0.575
Soil vs Plant Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-2
Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
ARSENIC
3.5 -n
Forbs
2.5
2
~0.5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
# forb measured
ORNL predicted
- - Kennecott predicted
In(soil)
3.5
2.5
2
fl.5
"Bn
0.5
o
-0.5
-1
Grasses
grass measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
234
In(soil)
3.5
3 -
2.5 -
2 -
0.5 -
0 -
-0.5 -
-1
Shrubs
A shrub measured
ORNL predicted
~ • Kennecott predicted
0
234
In(soil)
3.5
3
2.5
2
_ 1.5
3 1
SH 1
3 0.5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
All Plant Types
all types measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
, ...
In(soil)
Forb
Grass
Shrub
All
slope
0.16
0.31
0.00
0.15
int
-0.17
-1.24
-0.03
-0.48
R2
0.03
0.28
0.00
0.04
p value
0.352
0.005
0.969
0.065
Soil vs Plant Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-2
Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
CADMIUM
Forbs
-1
-2
• forb measured
ORNL predicted
- - Kennecott predicted
0 0.5 1 1.5
2 2.5
In(soil)
3.5
Grasses
2 -
1 -
-1 -
-2 -
-3
grass measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
0 0.5 1 1.5
2 2.5
In(soil)
3.5
4.5
4.5
4
3 -
2 -
f1-
"Bn
So -
-i
-2 -
Shrubs
A shrub measured
ORNL predicted
~ • Kennecott predicted
A
A
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
In(soil)
3.5
4.5
All Plant Types
2 -
J3
"Bn
£ 0 -
-1 -
-2 -
-3
all types measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
0 0.5 1 1.5
' 2'
'ln(soil)
3.5
4.5
Forb
Grass
Shrub
All
slope
0.05
0.19
-0.15
0.03
int
0.57
-1.22
0.95
0.10
R2
0.00
0.05
0.03
0.00
p value
0.817
0.253
0.408
0.811
Soil vs Plant Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-2
Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
LEAD
4.5
Forbs
4
i.5 -
S 2 -
1.5 -
1 -
0.5 -
0
• forb measured
ORNL predicted
- - Kennecott predicted
1 2
345
In(soil)
4.5
Grasses
f.5-
"Bn
£ 2
1.5
1
0.5
grass measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
• •• '
0 1
456
In(soil)
4.5 -
4 -
3.5 -
3 -
BH
3 2 -
1.5 -
1 -
0.5 -
0 -
Shrubs
A shrub measured
ORNL predicted
~ • Kennecott predicted
0
12
4 5
In(soil)
4.5
4
3.5
3
^2.5
J3
"Bn
£ 2
1.5
1
0.5
0
All Plant Types
all types measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
4. , ...5
In(soil)
Forb
Grass
Shrub
All
slope
0.24
0.28
0.03
0.18
int
0.09
-0.41
1.18
0.28
R2
0.10
0.13
0.00
0.07
p value
0.100
0.063
0.777
0.019
Soil vs Plant Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-2
Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
MERCURY
1
0.5
0
-0.5
^ -1
jl.5
s
~ -2
-2.5
Forbs
• forb measured
ORNL predicted
- - Kennecott predicted
-2-10
In(soil)
1 2
1
0.5 -
0 -
-0.5 -
"S -1 "
"Bn
31.5 -
-2 -
-2.5 -
-3 -
-3.5
Grasses
grass measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
-5 -4 -3 -2
-1 0
In(soil)
1 2
1
Shrubs
0.5 -
0 -
-0.5 -
f-1-
"Bn
31.5 -
-2 -
-2.5 -
-3.5
A shrub measured
ORNL predicted
~ • Kennecott predicted
-5
-3 -2
-1 0 1
In(soil)
1
0.5
0
-0.5
_ -1
1-1.5
"H*
~ -2
-2.5
-3.5
-4
All Plant Types
all types measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
-5 -4
-2 -1 0 1
In(soil)
Forb
Grass
Shrub
All
slope
-0.07
-0.02
0.01
-0.03
int
-2.78
-2.68
-2.70
-2.72
R2
0.14
0.01
0.00
0.03
p value
0.057
0.545
0.779
0.122
Soil vs Plant Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX G-2
Correlation of Measured Plant Tissue Concentrations with Bulk Soil Concentrations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
SELENIUM
Forbs
-1
-2
• forb measured
ORNL predicted
- - Kennecott predicted
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
In(soil)
2.5
Grasses
I grass measured
ORNL predicted
• Kennecott predicted
-1.5 -1
-0.5
0 0.5
In(soil)
1.5
3
2.5 -
2 -
1.5 -
1 -
fO-5-
t °-
-0.5 -
-1 -
-1.5 -
-2 -
-2.5
-1
Shrubs
A shrub measured
ORNL predicted
~ • Kennecott predicted
-1 -0.5
0 0.5
In(soil)
1.5
All Plant Types
2 -
J3
"Bn
£ 0 -
-1 -
-2 -
-3
all types measured
ORNL predicted
Kennecott predicted
.5 -1 -0.5 0 , , .„ 0.5
In(soil)
1 1.5
Forb
Grass
Shrub
All
slope
0.79
0.60
0.22
0.54
int
0.48
-0.37
-0.15
-0.02
R2
0.19
0.22
0.03
0.12
p value
0.025
0.013
0.378
0.002
Soil vs Plant Tissue.xls, 6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX H
Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations for Environmental Media
in Non-AOC and AOC Locations
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
H-l EPCs Based on the Arithmetic Mean
H-2 EPCs Based on the 95% UCL on the Arithmetic Mean
H-3 EPCs Based on the 90th Percentile
H-4 EPCs Based on the 95% UCL on the 90th Percentile
H_Cover Page.xls
-------
APPENDIX H-l
EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS FOR EVALUATING RISKS TO WILDLIFE RECEPTORS
EPCs Based on the Arithmetic Mean
-------
APPENDIX H-l
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (Mean)
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WA3
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (Mean)
Soil
mg/kg dw
11,312.92
4.30
87.71
147.32
16.45
14.32
213.03
1,041.25
521.42
0.92
13.05
1.28
1.04
21.72
483.99
21,225.00
2.64
46.88
142.63
14.26
21.19
111.41
488.75
547.00
0.53
16.53
0.52
0.89
34.88
285.25
13,565.40
8.62
184.90
127.08
16.89
14.49
289.88
1,631.50
465.88
1.63
13.69
2.65
1.09
25.88
552.59
13,434.38
8.90
357.55
324.03
17.97
16.12
319.40
1,776.75
663.78
1.98
15.45
2.95
1.60
24.20
578.40
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
17,250.00
6.72
228.80
147.10
17.43
17.85
354.09
1,919.00
519.90
2.07
16.37
3.38
1.86
28.45
608.10
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
Plants
mg/kg ww
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_Mean.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-l
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (Mean)
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (Mean)
Soil
mg/kg dw
15,855.56
9.90
235.11
221.00
22.53
18.70
477.56
1,776.67
906.33
3.49
14.69
3.11
2.03
29.94
1,244.00
10,573.08
4.60
80.38
104.08
11.86
11.90
174.43
991.48
404.77
0.80
11.60
1.54
0.65
19.55
291.71
9,033.46
3.88
83.38
123.17
10.15
13.50
497.43
652.08
645.77
0.59
13.55
1.44
1.09
15.34
929.22
8,210.61
0.88
50.12
104.81
2.32
10.97
75.58
249.11
504.06
0.12
9.69
0.29
0.58
15.52
197.79
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
5,398.92
1.41
20.19
58.69
3.01
8.75
127.66
202.73
280.70
0.14
7.46
0.93
0.48
10.09
240.11
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
Plants
mg/kg ww
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_Mean.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-l
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (Mean)
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah Bkg
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (Mean)
Soil
mg/kg dw
7,436.74
2.68
86.16
133.64
2.77
8.97
83.89
468.19
309.44
0.25
7.69
0.62
0.59
13.88
187.94
10,556.89
2.55
65.54
140.16
6.66
13.61
141.25
541.75
449.48
0.40
12.11
0.72
0.64
16.87
442.08
10,982.72
4.44
128.30
159.18
10.09
13.48
205.43
887.80
506.80
0.88
12.24
1.37
0.91
19.52
462.47
45,638.30
1.07
7.99
492.55
na
45.64
25.83
35.21
371.28
0.16
13.06
0.27
8.24
69.57
95.77
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
8,690.89
2.88
67.60
83.25
6.29
11.28
179.13
592.79
347.15
0.58
9.69
1.61
0.86
15.19
323.74
45,638.30
1.07
7.99
492.55
na
45.64
25.83
35.21
371.28
0.16
13.06
0.27
8.24
69.57
95.77
Surface
Water
mg/L
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.001
0.0044
0.074
1.4
0.0026
0.016
0.074
0.0031
0.0025
0.021
0.059
0.080
0.00020
0.010
0.0026
0.0010
0.0044
0.074
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Plants
mg/kg ww
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
44.69
0.09
1.53
na
2.65
na
na
5.76
na
0.05
na
2.60
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
47.27
0.05
1.39
na
1.80
na
na
5.20
na
na
na
1.84
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_Mean.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-l
AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (Mean) for Soil
Analytes
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Exposure Point Concentrations (EPCs) (mg/kg dw)
WAI
4,250
15.2
929
366
4
13
365
5,280
903
0.4
5
2.2
5.4
13
999
WA2
6,490
466.0
7,960
264
2,340
59
96,200
58,100
964
8.3
106
715.0
13.1
16
25,100
WA3
11,657
52.0
1,448
169
848
15
850
6,393
530
62.8
13
34.0
5.9
25
1,651
WA4
7,213
59.9
2,255
741
10
16
450
6,157
279
3.0
7
8.3
6.9
23
917
WA5
3,140
46.3
759
187
5
3
511
7,280
43
5.1
4
16.8
1.9
10
884
WA6
9,421
19.9
496
411
18
13
728
4,630
897
3.9
11
5.0
4.2
21
1,117
WA7
7,655
4.4
127
134
9
8
324
1,418
268
1.1
5
1.9
0.8
15
853
WA8/
WA11
5,623
4.4
237
145
5.1
10
376
1,412
1,574
0.4
8
1.4
3.1
14
627
WA9
4,273
8.4
453
345
2.8
9
180
2,210
436
0.3
5
1.5
2.5
11
479
WA10
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
All Work
Areas
8,589
40.0
1,184
310
343
14
1,730
5,340
752
24.2
11
23.6
5.0
20
1,414
ALL EPCs_Mean.xls (AOC for APP)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX H-2
EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS FOR EVALUATING RISKS TO WILDLIFE RECEPTORS
EPCs Based on the 95% UCL on the Arithmetic Mean
-------
APPENDIX H-2
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95TJCL on Mean or Max)
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on Mean or Max)
Soil
mg/kg dw
15,644.22
8.93
145.03
186.63
32.84
17.52
501.71
2,326.13
656.71
2.20
16.05
2.62
2.08
27.65
899.60
34,950.00
4.40
65.00
164.00
23.00
30.80
158.00
815.00
587.50
0.81
20.85
1.30
1.45
48.20
456.00
14,973.55
13.72
280.90
138.69
24.22
15.73
427.69
2,936.41
518.60
2.76
14.95
5.44
1.69
28.17
814.68
15,455.56
34.67
773.93
458.20
30.30
17.90
521.39
3,994.90
798.42
4.63
17.22
11.23
4.38
26.72
913.76
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
30,850.00
15.50
485.00
221.19
36.50
32.25
630.00
4,500.00
709.50
4.50
27.20
6.40
3.55
42.25
1,200.00
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
Plants
mg/kg ww
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_95UCLMean.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-2
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95TJCL on Mean or Max)
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on Mean or Max)
Soil
mg/kg dw
17,373.35
21.39
378.23
271.14
40.84
19.94
795.31
3,881.53
1,310.27
9.39
16.91
8.83
4.49
33.48
4,044.76
14,922.28
11.67
149.78
142.12
26.72
15.55
373.28
2,633.88
485.33
1.91
14.56
6.25
1.59
25.86
488.47
12,504.93
7.67
163.10
158.70
23.00
16.73
1,845.00
1,793.43
902.10
1.35
18.58
3.52
2.55
19.20
2,390.00
10,595.91
1.41
70.79
138.42
3.18
13.01
126.88
359.75
616.45
0.20
11.19
0.40
0.76
18.71
272.01
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
8,867.76
3.36
33.66
88.84
5.30
11.03
214.80
402.47
352.61
0.64
10.90
2.02
0.60
14.86
394.21
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
Plants
mg/kg ww
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_95UCLMean.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-2
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95TJCL on Mean or Max)
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
UtahBkg
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on Mean or Max)
Soil
mg/kg dw
10,507.32
4.41
153.89
205.35
4.57
11.05
159.16
905.67
406.73
0.60
9.60
0.99
0.75
17.19
266.50
11,537.32
3.76
81.40
153.13
8.70
14.69
177.02
757.87
492.49
0.58
13.20
0.93
0.73
18.03
594.74
11,945.06
5.79
155.94
179.64
13.14
14.27
247.03
1,095.69
539.40
1.16
12.97
1.62
1.02
20.78
537.88
54,645.57
1.12
10.26
579.38
na
52.97
30.24
59.80
437.81
0.37
14.96
0.35
9.81
81.63
165.51
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
14,977.77
6.95
139.27
125.71
13.55
14.41
300.51
1,492.17
436.18
4.50
14.03
3.81
1.28
22.96
515.51
54,645.57
1.12
10.26
579.38
na
52.97
30.24
59.80
437.81
0.37
14.96
0.35
9.81
81.63
165.51
Surface
Water
mg/L
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.001
0.0090
0.180
8.9
0.0037
0.026
0.089
0.0062
0.0039
0.035
0.305
0.226
0.00035
0.012
0.0042
0.0014
0.0090
0.180
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Plants
mg/kg ww
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
49.19
0.11
1.82
na
3.63
na
na
6.94
na
0.06
na
3.56
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
57.02
0.11
1.80
na
2.32
na
na
7.96
na
na
na
2.66
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_95UCLMean.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-2
AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on Mean or Max) for Soil
Analytes
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Exposure Point Concentrations (EPCs) (mg/kg dw)
WAI
4,250
15.2
929
366
4
13
365
5,280
903
0.4
5
2.2
5.4
13
999
WA2
6,490
466.0
7,960
264
2,340
59
96,200
58,100
964
8.3
106
715.0
13.1
16
25,100
WA3
13,059
139.8
2,958
201
2,217
16
1,662
19,064
667
155.7
14
133.8
17.0
28
3,066
WA4
10,796
230.0
9,770
2,055
27
22
826
22,000
441
14.6
11
18.0
17.7
28
3,423
WA5
3,140
46.3
759
187
5
3
511
7,280
43
5.1
4
16.8
1.9
10
884
WA6
13,561
120.0
762
723
64
16
1,366
8,038
2,060
9.2
14
10.0
13.0
25
2,128
WA7
11,500
6.9
178
195
19
12
340
1,960
504
2.0
8
2.0
0.9
19
1,670
WA8/
WA11
7,151
20.0
453
236
20.9
12
1,007
5,480
3,295
0.9
10
4.4
7.4
16
1,602
WA9
6,080
10.7
598
411
5.3
11
199
3,000
766
0.4
6
1.8
3.3
13
713
WA10
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
All Work
Areas
9,849
106.1
1,796
399
835
15
3,614
9,091
1,108
57.6
13
41.1
7.7
22
1,992
ALL EPCs_95UCLMean.xls (AOC for APP)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX H-3
EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS FOR EVALUATING RISKS TO WILDLIFE RECEPTORS
EPCs Based on the 90th Percentile
-------
APPENDIX H-3
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (90th Percentile)
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (90th Percentile)
Soil
mg/kg dw
16,190.00
9.33
119.00
190.50
26.50
18.97
361.90
1,680.00
666.30
1.57
15.97
1.87
2.15
29.31
711.90
30,105.00
4.15
60.80
159.80
22.70
27.49
149.45
770.00
582.25
0.78
19.62
1.04
1.42
44.18
437.40
17,700.00
15.30
386.00
166.20
33.10
19.10
598.00
3,250.00
647.00
3.54
17.50
6.32
2.67
31.70
1,230.00
20,660.00
21.00
569.65
527.00
39.28
22.74
529.05
3,864.50
1,097.50
3.10
21.92
6.95
3.96
33.27
1,167.45
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
25,110.00
13.16
408.20
193.50
30.90
25.95
598.00
3,880.00
673.70
4.00
22.99
6.32
3.17
37.55
1,160.00
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
Plants
mg/kg ww
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_90th.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-3
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (90th Percentile)
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (90th Percentile)
Soil
mg/kg dw
18,100.00
17.80
352.00
295.20
50.00
20.98
1,016.00
3,420.00
1,456.00
6.71
18.56
7.04
4.14
35.06
2,171.60
13,580.00
11.09
169.80
147.00
28.40
14.90
317.00
2,550.00
524.00
1.77
14.40
4.79
1.58
25.40
652.00
14,980.00
7.04
157.60
187.20
20.50
20.50
1,403.60
1,289.00
1,048.40
1.16
22.50
3.10
2.00
23.70
1,855.60
17,830.00
2.45
98.98
194.10
5.26
18.70
80.01
644.00
823.80
0.22
14.85
0.43
1.02
29.90
564.00
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
8,730.00
3.22
34.24
71.98
5.89
11.79
189.34
436.70
379.30
0.38
12.38
1.51
0.64
15.30
410.30
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
Plants
mg/kg ww
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_90th.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-3
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (90th Percentile)
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah Bkg
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (90th Percentile)
Soil
mg/kg dw
13,580.00
5.80
167.90
246.20
6.06
14.94
179.60
1,181.00
532.00
0.52
12.80
1.34
1.21
24.70
340.00
15,400.00
5.07
140.00
201.50
11.65
19.30
260.00
1,046.50
646.75
0.76
18.00
1.48
1.29
24.00
813.00
17,540.00
9.67
300.30
220.10
22.05
19.87
411.10
1,816.05
760.90
1.61
18.50
3.41
2.10
30.46
944.15
70,000.00
1.26
14.80
1,000.00
na
70.00
50.00
38.00
700.00
0.09
20.00
0.39
11.81
120.00
85.80
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
16,755.00
6.78
237.45
157.80
15.98
17.63
504.35
1,505.10
592.35
1.40
16.52
5.20
2.57
29.10
768.20
70,000.00
1.26
14.80
1,000.00
na
70.00
50.00
38.00
700.00
0.09
20.00
0.39
11.81
120.00
85.80
Surface
Water
mg/L
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.002
0.0054
0.130
2.5
0.0047
0.032
0.101
0.0042
0.0042
0.060
0.188
0.184
0.00069
0.017
0.0045
0.0016
0.0054
0.130
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Plants
mg/kg ww
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
63.26
0.18
3.16
na
5.62
na
na
11.46
na
0.09
na
7.67
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
80.91
0.11
2.77
na
2.76
na
na
8.80
na
na
na
3.87
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_90th.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-3
AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (90th Percentile) for Soil
Analytes
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Exposure Point Concentrations (EPCs) (mg/kg dw)
WAI
4,250
15.2
929
366
4
13
365
5,280
903
0.4
5
2.2
5.4
13
999
WA2
6,490
466.0
7,960
264
2,340
59
96,200
58,100
964
8.3
106
715.0
13.1
16
25,100
WA3
14,900
89.0
2,200
220
160
18
1,570
25,600
785
25.6
18
79.0
20.0
32
4,000
WA4
13,100
162.0
6,586
2,048
23
25
637
16,420
521
5.6
12
16.0
8.8
30
2,166
WA5
3,140
46.3
759
187
5
3
511
7,280
43
5.1
4
16.8
1.9
10
884
WA6
13,610
25.0
600
504
38
17
1,108
4,456
1,530
4.4
14
6.3
9.8
30
2,700
WA7
10,731
6.4
168
183
17
11
337
1,852
457
1.8
7
2.0
0.9
18
1,507
WA8/
WA11
9,429
7.6
605
267
11.3
14
1,204
3,413
1,390
0.8
14
2.8
6.6
21
1,443
WA9
5,648
10.0
579
395
4.4
11
197
2,823
672
0.3
6
1.7
3.1
12
646
WA10
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
All Work
Areas
14,100
107.6
2,152
567
62
18
1,402
15,520
1,264
10.6
16
16.5
13.1
30
2,590
ALL EPCs_90th.xls (AOC for APP)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX H-4
EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS FOR EVALUATING RISKS TO WILDLIFE RECEPTORS
EPCs Based on the 95% UCL on the 90th Percentile
-------
APPENDIX H-4
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95TJCL on 90th Percentile or Max)
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on 90th Percentile or Max)
Soil
mg/kg dw
29,626.00
21.88
321.81
318.36
76.52
28.78
1,205.69
5,471.79
1,105.63
7.94
26.63
6.37
5.02
47.61
2,123.42
205,292.07
91.05
281.29
304.01
819.30
108.00
1,147.99
16,787.78
800.23
9.65
48.68
71.27
714.44
190.77
8,287.48
21,606.72
32.89
625.55
194.11
54.31
21.61
978.80
6,706.83
766.16
6.26
20.50
12.52
3.97
38.92
1,800.69
25,692.09
59.79
1,741.11
909.47
69.99
27.03
1,204.70
8,986.72
1,365.02
9.48
26.33
21.96
9.01
39.31
2,068.99
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
97,273.35
350.46
11,985.16
514.90
371.45
97.12
14,990.57
187,996.43
1,378.70
178.92
67.18
575.33
153.93
146.12
15,960.46
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
Plants
mg/kg ww
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_95UCL90th.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-4
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95TJCL on 90th Percentile or Max)
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on 90th Percentile or Max)
Soil
mg/kg dw
22,513.48
55.94
840.06
441.21
97.02
24.02
1,858.30
10,035.29
2,624.95
25.01
24.46
22.23
11.30
45.02
8,827.84
29,381.81
27.50
343.60
266.88
64.00
28.23
876.81
6,361.85
778.51
4.45
24.60
14.13
3.81
47.94
1,117.58
24,976.90
18.12
380.22
284.80
70.29
28.17
4,700.44
4,266.90
1,780.36
9.30
36.54
9.07
6.08
32.93
6,868.09
21,461.46
3.32
150.23
282.43
6.89
23.10
205.87
826.52
1,192.86
0.42
18.84
0.64
1.40
34.71
613.27
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
19,681.17
7.72
75.32
187.38
12.25
19.29
484.51
927.67
605.66
1.11
22.92
4.65
1.05
30.35
862.18
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface
Water
mg/L
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
Plants
mg/kg ww
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_95UCL90th.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-4
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95TJCL on 90th Percentile or Max)
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah Bkg
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on 90th Percentile or Max)
Soil
mg/kg dw
21,454.11
9.89
359.77
458.13
10.47
19.50
360.95
2,120.71
790.25
1.33
17.48
2.24
1.45
30.87
567.29
17,975.12
8.34
167.00
236.38
17.99
22.06
361.44
1,644.04
769.11
1.29
20.38
1.96
1.35
25.99
1,274.59
21,119.58
13.07
306.92
307.53
29.45
22.73
559.97
2,464.02
920.90
2.52
20.91
3.63
2.18
34.00
1,150.18
102,921.56
1.34
19.60
1,101.04
na
95.32
56.48
74.35
818.65
0.22
26.39
0.64
15.85
153.42
166.98
Sediment
mg/kg dw
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
34,728.78
15.81
308.78
277.20
30.03
27.49
698.23
2,915.95
784.95
4.69
29.74
8.66
2.97
51.31
1,153.83
102,921.56
1.34
19.60
1,101.04
na
95.32
56.48
74.35
818.65
0.22
26.39
0.64
15.85
153.42
166.98
Surface
Water
mg/L
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.003
0.0208
0.356
14.5
0.0083
0.048
0.156
0.0065
0.0087
0.078
0.372
0.452
0.00047
0.023
0.0095
0.0029
0.0208
0.356
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Plants
mg/kg ww
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
76.47
0.23
3.30
na
8.30
na
na
12.84
na
0.10
na
6.98
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
mg/kg ww
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
mg/kg ww
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
98.82
0.25
3.50
na
4.53
na
na
17.36
na
na
na
5.76
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Benthics
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
Small
Mammals
mg/kg ww
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
ALL EPCs_95UCL90th.xls: EPC-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX H-4
AOC Wildlife Exposure Point Concentrations (95UCL on 90th Percentile or Max) for Soil
Analytes
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Exposure Point Concentrations (EPCs) (mg/kg dw)
WAI
4,250
15.2
929
366
4
13
365
5,280
903
0.4
5
2.2
5.4
13
999
WA2
6,490
466.0
7,960
264
2,340
59
96,200
58,100
964
8.3
106
715.0
13.1
16
25,100
WA3
19,958
230.5
4,621
356
668
24
3,742
32,789
1,252
100.8
22
149.3
28.3
42
6,909
WA4
23,230
1,833.1
20,669
4,473
520
45
1,921
73,697
956
43.7
23
51.6
38.8
45
7,446
WA5
3,140
46.3
759
187
5
3
511
7,280
43
5.1
4
16.8
1.9
10
884
WA6
27,862
336.0
1,541
1,567
164
25
3,234
17,697
4,998
22.9
24
24.5
59.4
38
5,111
WA7
11,500
6.9
178
195
19
12
340
1,960
504
2.0
8
2.0
0.9
19
1,670
WA8/
WA11
13,219
60.6
1,095
524
41.3
19
2,300
11,428
5,720
2.0
19
8.7
16.8
25
3,616
WA9
33,668
24.0
4,173
810
48.7
37
441
18,855
7,061
1.0
15
3.9
10.4
32
3,882
WA10
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
All Work
Areas
18,173
161.7
3,087
726
219
26
2,581
19,331
1,773
21.0
23
46.0
16.6
36
4,140
ALL EPCs_95UCL90th.xls (AOC for APP)
6/10/2004
-------
APPENDIX I
Detailed Wildlife Risk Calculations for Non-AOC Locations (HQ Types A, B, C, and D)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
HQ Type A: Tables A-l to A-l 1 (one table per receptor)
HQ Type B: Tables B-l to B-ll (one table per receptor)
HQ Type C: Tables C-l to C-ll (one table per receptor)
HQ Type D: Tables D-l to D-l 1 (one table per receptor)
l_Cover Page.xls
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-l
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WA3
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-l
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-l
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
7.2E-04
NC
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1. 7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
NC
2.2E-05
7. 7E-05
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-2
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WA3
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.4E-01
9.6E-03
9.4E-03
3.7E-04
2.8E-03
2.9E-04
6.8E-04
2.9E-02
1.5E-03
4.0E-05
8.4E-04
6.9E-04
1.6E-04
4.3E-03
l.OE-03
4.6E-01
5.9E-03
5.0E-03
3.6E-04
2.4E-03
4.2E-04
3.6E-04
1.4E-02
1.5E-03
2.3E-05
1.1E-03
2.8E-04
1.4E-04
6.9E-03
6.0E-04
2.9E-01
1.9E-02
2.0E-02
3.2E-04
2.9E-03
2.9E-04
9.3E-04
4.6E-02
1.3E-03
7.0E-05
8.8E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
5.1E-03
1.2E-03
2.9E-01
2.0E-02
3.8E-02
8.2E-04
3.1E-03
3.2E-04
l.OE-03
5.0E-02
1.9E-03
8.5E-05
9.9E-04
1.6E-03
2.5E-04
4.8E-03
1.2E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
Plants
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.6E-01
7.3E-02
6.1E-02
4.4E-04
1.5E-01
3.0E-04
7.0E-04
8.0E-02
1.5E-03
2.3E-03
l.OE-03
4.4E-01
2.2E-04
4.6E-03
LIE-OS
7. 7E-01
6.9E-02
5. 7E-02
4.2E-04
1.5E-01
4.4E-04
3.8E-04
6.5E-02
1.6E-03
2.3E-03
1.3E-03
4.4E-01
1.9E-04
7.2E-03
6.5E-04
6.0E-01
8.2E-02
7.2E-02
3.9E-04
1.5E-01
3.1E-04
9.5E-04
9. 7E-02
1.4E-03
2.3E-03
LIE-OS
4.4E-01
2.2E-04
5.4E-03
1.2E-03
6.0E-01
8.3E-02
9.0E-02
8.8E-04
1.5E-01
3.4E-04
l.OE-03
l.OE-01
1.9E-03
2.3E-03
1.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.1E-04
5.1E-03
1.3E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-2
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.4E-01
2.2E-02
2.5E-02
5.6E-04
3.8E-03
3.7E-04
1.5E-03
5.0E-02
2.6E-03
1.5E-04
9.4E-04
1.7E-03
3.2E-04
5.9E-03
2.6E-03
2.3E-01
l.OE-02
8.6E-03
2.6E-04
2.0E-03
2.4E-04
5.6E-04
2.8E-02
1.1E-03
3.4E-05
7.4E-04
8.2E-04
l.OE-04
3.9E-03
6.1E-04
1.9E-01
8.7E-03
8.9E-03
3.1E-04
1.7E-03
2.7E-04
1.6E-03
1.8E-02
1.8E-03
2.5E-05
8.7E-04
7.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.0E-03
1.9E-03
1.8E-01
2.0E-03
5.4E-03
2.7E-04
4.0E-04
2.2E-04
2.4E-04
7.0E-03
1.4E-03
5.3E-06
6.2E-04
1.6E-04
9.3E-05
3.1E-03
4.1E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
Plants
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
6.5E-01
8.5E-02
7. 7E-02
6.2E-04
1.5E-01
3.9E-04
1.6E-03
l.OE-01
2.6E-03
2.4E-03
1.2E-03
4.4E-01
3. 7E-04
6.2E-03
2. 7E-03
5.4E-01
7.4E-02
6.1E-02
3.3E-04
1.4E-01
2.5E-04
5.8E-04
7.9E-02
1.2E-03
2.3E-03
9.5E-04
4.4E-01
1.6E-04
4.2E-03
6.6E-04
5.1E-01
7.2E-02
6.1E-02
3.8E-04
1.4E-01
2.9E-04
1.6E-03
6.9E-02
1.9E-03
2.3E-03
1.1E-03
4.4E-01
2.2E-04
3.3E-03
2.0E-03
4.9E-01
6.5E-02
5. 7E-02
3.3E-04
1.4E-01
2.4E-04
2.6E-04
5.8E-02
1.5E-03
2.2E-03
8.3E-04
4.4E-01
1.4E-04
3.4E-03
4. 7E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-2
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.6E-01
6.0E-03
9.2E-03
3.4E-04
4.7E-04
1.8E-04
2.7E-04
1.3E-02
8.7E-04
1.1E-05
4.9E-04
3.3E-04
9.3E-05
2.7E-03
3.9E-04
2.3E-01
5.7E-03
7.0E-03
3.6E-04
1.1E-03
2.7E-04
4.5E-04
1.5E-02
1.3E-03
1.7E-05
7.8E-04
3.8E-04
l.OE-04
3.3E-03
9.2E-04
2.4E-01
9.9E-03
1.4E-02
4.0E-04
1.7E-03
2.7E-04
6.6E-04
2.5E-02
1.4E-03
3.8E-05
7.8E-04
7.3E-04
1.4E-04
3.9E-03
9.7E-04
9.8E-01
2.4E-03
8.6E-04
1.2E-03
9.1E-04
8.3E-05
9.8E-04
l.OE-03
7.0E-06
8.4E-04
1.4E-04
1.3E-03
1.4E-02
2.0E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
Plants
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4. 7E-01
6.9E-02
6.1E-02
4.0E-04
1.4E-01
2.0E-04
2.9E-04
6.4E-02
9.5E-04
2.2E-03
7.0E-04
4.4E-01
1.4E-04
3.0E-03
4.4E-04
5.4E-01
6.9E-02
5.9E-02
4.2E-04
1.4E-01
2.9E-04
4. 7E-04
6.6E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-03
9.9E-04
4.4E-01
1.5E-04
3.6E-03
9.8E-04
5.5E-01
7.3E-02
6.6E-02
4. 7E-04
1.4E-01
2.9E-04
6.8E-04
7.6E-02
1.5E-03
2.3E-03
9.9E-04
4.4E-01
2.0E-04
4.2E-03
l.OE-03
9.8E-01
2.4E-03
8.6E-04
1.2E-03
NC
9.1E-04
8.3E-05
9.8E-04
l.OE-03
7.0E-06
8.4E-04
1.4E-04
1.3E-03
1.4E-02
2.0E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-3
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: \_
Red Fox
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.7E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-02
1.5E-03
1.1E-02
1.1E-03
2.7E-03
1.2E-01
5.8E-03
1.6E-04
3.3E-03
2.7E-03
6.5E-04
1.7E-02
4.0E-03
1.8E+00
2.3E-02
2.0E-02
1.4E-03
9.7E-03
1.7E-03
1.4E-03
5.4E-02
6.1E-03
9.1E-05
4.2E-03
1.1E-03
5.6E-04
2.7E-02
2.4E-03
1.2E+00
7.6E-02
7.9E-02
1.3E-03
1.1E-02
1.2E-03
3.7E-03
1.8E-01
5.2E-03
2.8E-04
3.5E-03
5.6E-03
6.8E-04
2.0E-02
4.6E-03
1.1E+00
7.9E-02
1.5E-01
3.3E-03
1.2E-02
1.3E-03
4.1E-03
2.0E-01
7.4E-03
3.4E-04
3.9E-03
6.3E-03
l.OE-03
1.9E-02
4.8E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
Plants
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+00
6. 7E-02
6.0E-02
1.6E-03
7.1E-02
1.2E-03
2. 7E-03
1.4E-01
6.0E-03
1.1E-03
3. 7E-03
1.9E-01
7.5E-04
1.8E-02
4.1E-03
2.0E+00
5.3E-02
4.3E-02
1.6E-03
6.9E-02
1. 7E-03
1.5E-03
7.6E-02
6.3E-03
l.OE-03
4.6E-03
1.8E-01
6.6E-04
2.8E-02
2.5E-03
1.3E+00
1.1E-01
l.OE-01
1.4E-03
7.1E-02
1.2E-03
3. 7E-03
2.0E-01
5.4E-03
1.2E-03
3.9E-03
1.9E-01
7.9E-04
2.1E-02
4. 7E-03
1.3E+00
1.1E-01
1. 7E-01
3.4E-03
7.2E-02
1.3E-03
4.1E-03
2.2E-01
7.6E-03
1.3E-03
4.3E-03
1.9E-01
1.1E-03
2.0E-02
4.9E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-3
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: \_
Red Fox
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.4E+00
8.8E-02
l.OE-01
2.2E-03
1.5E-02
1.5E-03
6.1E-03
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
5.9E-04
3.7E-03
6.6E-03
1.3E-03
2.4E-02
l.OE-02
9.0E-01
4.1E-02
3.4E-02
l.OE-03
8.0E-03
9.5E-04
2.2E-03
1.1E-01
4.5E-03
1.4E-04
3.0E-03
3.3E-03
4.1E-04
1.5E-02
2.4E-03
7.7E-01
3.4E-02
3.5E-02
1.2E-03
6.9E-03
1.1E-03
6.3E-03
7.2E-02
7.2E-03
l.OE-04
3.4E-03
3.1E-03
6.8E-04
1.2E-02
7.7E-03
7.0E-01
7.7E-03
2.1E-02
1.1E-03
1.6E-03
8.7E-04
9.6E-04
2.8E-02
5.6E-03
2.1E-05
2.5E-03
6.2E-04
3.7E-04
1.2E-02
1.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
Plants
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E-01
2.3E-03
7.5E-02
1.5E-03
6.1E-03
2.2E-01
l.OE-02
1.5E-03
4.1E-03
1.9E-01
1.4E-03
2.4E-02
l.OE-02
l.OE+00
7.0E-02
5. 7E-02
1.2E-03
6.8E-02
9.8E-04
2.3E-03
1.3E-01
4. 7E-03
1.1E-03
3.4E-03
1.9E-01
5.1E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
9.2E-01
6.4E-02
5.8E-02
1.4E-03
6. 7E-02
LIE-OS
6.4E-03
9.5E-02
7.4E-03
l.OE-03
3.9E-03
1.9E-01
7.8E-04
1.3E-02
7.8E-03
8.5E-01
3. 7E-02
4.4E-02
1.2E-03
6.1E-02
9.0E-04
l.OE-03
5.0E-02
5.8E-03
9.6E-04
2.9E-03
1.8E-01
4. 7E-04
1.3E-02
1. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-3
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: \_
Red Fox
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.4E-01
2.4E-02
3.7E-02
1.3E-03
1.9E-03
7.1E-04
1.1E-03
5.2E-02
3.5E-03
4.2E-05
2.0E-03
1.3E-03
3.7E-04
1.1E-02
1.6E-03
9.0E-01
2.3E-02
2.8E-02
1.4E-03
4.5E-03
1.1E-03
1.8E-03
6.0E-02
5.0E-03
6.9E-05
3.1E-03
1.5E-03
4.0E-04
1.3E-02
3.7E-03
9.4E-01
3.9E-02
5.5E-02
1.6E-03
6.8E-03
1.1E-03
2.6E-03
9.9E-02
5.7E-03
1.5E-04
3.1E-03
2.9E-03
5.8E-04
1.5E-02
3.8E-03
3.9E+00
9.4E-03
3.4E-03
5.0E-03
3.6E-03
3.3E-04
3.9E-03
4.1E-03
2.8E-05
3.3E-03
5.7E-04
5.2E-03
5.5E-02
7.9E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
Plants
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.8E-01
5.3E-02
5.9E-02
1.5E-03
6.2E-02
7.4E-04
LIE-OS
7.4E-02
3.6E-03
9.8E-04
2.4E-03
1.8E-01
4. 7E-04
1.1E-02
1. 7E-03
l.OE+00
5.2E-02
5.0E-02
1.5E-03
6.4E-02
1.1E-03
1.8E-03
8.2E-02
5.2E-03
l.OE-03
3.5E-03
1.8E-01
5.0E-04
1.4E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E+00
6.9E-02
7. 7E-02
1. 7E-03
6. 7E-02
LIE-OS
2. 7E-03
1.2E-01
5.8E-03
LIE-OS
3.5E-03
1.9E-01
6.8E-04
1.6E-02
3.9E-03
3.9E+00
9.4E-03
3.4E-03
5.0E-03
NC
3.6E-03
3.3E-04
3.9E-03
4.1E-03
2.8E-05
3.3E-03
5. 7E-04
5.2E-03
5.5E-02
7.9E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-4
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.6E+00
1.2E-01
7.6E-02
1.7E-01
9.7E-02
2.9E-01
9.7E+00
3.2E-02
2.2E-02
2.2E-02
4.2E-02
2.9E-02
1.3E-01
2.9E+00
6.5E-02
7.3E-02
1.5E-01
1.4E-01
1.5E-01
4.5E+00
3.4E-02
1.3E-02
2.8E-02
1.7E-02
4.6E-02
7.9E-02
1.9E+00
2.5E-01
6.5E-02
1.7E-01
9.8E-02
4.0E-01
1.5E+01
2.9E-02
3.9E-02
2.4E-02
8.7E-02
3.4E-02
1.5E-01
1.9E+00
4.9E-01
1.7E-01
1.9E-01
1.1E-01
4.4E-01
1.7E+01
4.1E-02
4.7E-02
2.7E-02
9.7E-02
3.2E-02
1.6E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.8E+00
NC
1.9E-01
7.6E-02
8.3E-01
9. 7E-02
2.9E-01
1.1E+01
3.2E-02
2.2E-02
2.3E-02
2.2E+00
NC
2.9E-02
1.4E-01
3.2E+00
NC
1.3E-01
7.4E-02
8.1E-01
1.4E-01
1.5E-01
6.3E+00
3.4E-02
1.3E-02
2.9E-02
2.2E+00
NC
4. 7E-02
8.0E-02
2.1E+00
NC
3.2E-01
6.6E-02
8.4E-01
9.8E-02
4.0E-01
1.7E+01
2.9E-02
3.9E-02
2.4E-02
2.2E+00
NC
3.5E-02
1.5E-01
2.1E+00
NC
5.6E-01
1. 7E-01
8.5E-01
1.1E-01
4.4E-01
1.8E+01
4.1E-02
4. 7E-02
2. 7E-02
2.2E+00
NC
3.2E-02
1.6E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-4
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.2E+00
3.2E-01
1.1E-01
2.3E-01
1.3E-01
6.6E-01
1.7E+01
5.6E-02
8.3E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-01
4.0E-02
3.5E-01
1.5E+00
1.1E-01
5.4E-02
1.2E-01
8.1E-02
2.4E-01
9.2E+00
2.5E-02
1.9E-02
2.0E-02
5.0E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
1.2E+00
1.1E-01
6.3E-02
l.OE-01
9.1E-02
6.9E-01
6.1E+00
4.0E-02
1.4E-02
2.3E-02
4.7E-02
2.0E-02
2.6E-01
1.1E+00
6.9E-02
5.4E-02
2.4E-02
7.4E-02
l.OE-01
2.3E+00
3.1E-02
3.0E-03
1.7E-02
9.5E-03
2.1E-02
5.5E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.4E+00
NC
3.9E-01
1.1E-01
8.9E-01
1.3E-01
6.6E-01
1.8E+01
5.6E-02
8.3E-02
2.5E-02
2.3E+00
NC
4.0E-02
3.5E-01
1.7E+00
NC
1.8E-01
5.4E-02
7.8E-01
8.1E-02
2.4E-01
1.1E+01
2.5E-02
1.9E-02
2.0E-02
2.2E+00
NC
2.6E-02
8.2E-02
1.5E+00
NC
1.8E-01
6.4E-02
7. 7E-01
9.2E-02
6.9E-01
7.8E+00
4.0E-02
1.4E-02
2.4E-02
2.2E+00
NC
2.1E-02
2.6E-01
1.4E+00
NC
1.4E-01
5.4E-02
6.9E-01
7.5E-02
l.OE-01
4.0E+00
3.1E-02
3.0E-03
1. 7E-02
2.2E+00
NC
2.1E-02
5.5E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-4
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
6.9E-02
2.9E-02
6.1E-02
1.2E-01
4.4E+00
1.9E-02
5.8E-03
1.3E-02
2.0E-02
1.8E-02
5.2E-02
1.5E+00
9.0E-02
7.2E-02
6.9E-02
9.2E-02
2.0E-01
5.0E+00
2.8E-02
9.5E-03
2.1E-02
2.4E-02
2.2E-02
1.2E-01
1.5E+00
1.8E-01
8.2E-02
l.OE-01
9.1E-02
2.8E-01
8.3E+00
3.1E-02
2.1E-02
2.1E-02
4.5E-02
2.6E-02
1.3E-01
6.3E+00
1.1E-02
2.5E-01
3.1E-01
3.6E-02
3.3E-01
2.3E-02
3.9E-03
2.2E-02
8.8E-03
9.3E-02
2.7E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.3E+00
NC
1.9E-01
6.9E-02
6.9E-01
6.1E-02
1.2E-01
6.1E+00
1.9E-02
5.9E-03
1.3E-02
2.2E+00
NC
1.9E-02
5.3E-02
1.7E+00
NC
1.6E-01
7.3E-02
7.3E-01
9.2E-02
2.0E-01
6.8E+00
2.8E-02
9.6E-03
2.1E-02
2.2E+00
NC
2.3E-02
1.2E-01
1.8E+00
NC
2.5E-01
8.2E-02
7. 7E-01
9.2E-02
2.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.1E-02
2.1E-02
2.1E-02
2.2E+00
NC
2.6E-02
1.3E-01
6.3E+00
NC
1.1E-02
2.5E-01
NC
3.1E-01
3.6E-02
3.3E-01
2.3E-02
3.9E-03
2.2E-02
8.8E-03
NC
9.3E-02
2. 7E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-5
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
5.0E-01
3.9E-02
2.4E-02
5.5E-02
3.1E-02
9.5E-02
3.1E+00
l.OE-02
7.1E-03
7.2E-03
1.4E-02
9.3E-03
4.4E-02
9.5E-01
2.1E-02
2.4E-02
4.7E-02
4.6E-02
5.0E-02
1.5E+00
1.1E-02
4.1E-03
9.2E-03
5.5E-03
1.5E-02
2.6E-02
6.0E-01
8.2E-02
2.1E-02
5.6E-02
3.2E-02
1.3E-01
4.9E+00
9.3E-03
1.2E-02
7.6E-03
2.8E-02
1.1E-02
5.0E-02
6.0E-01
1.6E-01
5.4E-02
6.0E-02
3.5E-02
1.4E-01
5.3E+00
1.3E-02
1.5E-02
8.6E-03
3.1E-02
l.OE-02
5.2E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
Plants
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
6.0E-01
NC
7.1E-02
2.5E-02
4. 7E-01
3.1E-02
9.5E-02
3.9E+00
l.OE-02
1.6E-01
7.4E-03
1.3E+00
NC
9.4E-03
4.4E-02
l.OE+00
NC
5.3E-02
2.4E-02
4.6E-01
4.6E-02
5.0E-02
2.3E+00
1.1E-02
1.5E-01
9.3E-03
1.3E+00
NC
1.5E-02
2.6E-02
7.0E-01
NC
1.1E-01
2.1E-02
4. 7E-01
3.2E-02
1.3E-01
5.7E+00
9.3E-03
1.6E-01
7. 7E-03
1.3E+00
NC
1.1E-02
5.0E-02
6.9E-01
NC
1.9E-01
5.4E-02
4.8E-01
3.5E-02
1.4E-01
6.2E+00
1.3E-02
1.6E-01
8. 7E-03
1.3E+00
NC
l.OE-02
5.2E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-5
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
7.1E-01
l.OE-01
3.7E-02
7.5E-02
4.1E-02
2.1E-01
5.3E+00
1.8E-02
2.7E-02
8.2E-03
3.3E-02
1.3E-02
1.1E-01
4.7E-01
3.6E-02
1.7E-02
3.9E-02
2.6E-02
7.8E-02
3.0E+00
8.1E-03
6.2E-03
6.4E-03
1.6E-02
8.4E-03
2.6E-02
4.0E-01
3.7E-02
2.0E-02
3.4E-02
3.0E-02
2.2E-01
2.0E+00
1.3E-02
4.5E-03
7.5E-03
1.5E-02
6.6E-03
8.4E-02
3.7E-01
2.2E-02
1.7E-02
7.7E-03
2.4E-02
3.4E-02
7.5E-01
l.OE-02
9.5E-04
5.4E-03
3.1E-03
6.7E-03
1.8E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
Plants
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
8.0E-01
NC
1.4E-01
3. 7E-02
4.9E-01
4.1E-02
2.1E-01
6.2E+00
1.8E-02
1.8E-01
8.3E-03
1.3E+00
NC
1.3E-02
1.1E-01
5. 7E-01
NC
6.8E-02
1.8E-02
4.6E-01
2.6E-02
7.8E-02
3.8E+00
8.1E-03
1.5E-01
6.6E-03
1.3E+00
NC
8.5E-03
2.6E-02
5.0E-01
NC
6.9E-02
2.1E-02
4.5E-01
3.0E-02
2.2E-01
2.8E+00
1.3E-02
1.5E-01
7. 7E-03
1.3E+00
NC
6.6E-03
8.4E-02
4.6E-01
NC
5.4E-02
1.8E-02
4.2E-01
2.4E-02
3.4E-02
1.6E+00
l.OE-02
1.5E-01
5.5E-03
1.3E+00
NC
6. 7E-03
1.8E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-5
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.3E-01
3.8E-02
2.2E-02
9.2E-03
2.0E-02
3.7E-02
1.4E+00
6.2E-03
1.9E-03
4.3E-03
6.5E-03
6.0E-03
1.7E-02
4.7E-01
2.9E-02
2.3E-02
2.2E-02
3.0E-02
6.3E-02
1.6E+00
9.0E-03
3.1E-03
6.7E-03
7.6E-03
7.3E-03
4.0E-02
4.9E-01
5.7E-02
2.6E-02
3.4E-02
2.9E-02
9.2E-02
2.7E+00
l.OE-02
6.8E-03
6.8E-03
1.5E-02
8.4E-03
4.2E-02
2.0E+00
3.6E-03
8.2E-02
l.OE-01
1.2E-02
1.1E-01
7.4E-03
1.3E-03
7.3E-03
2.8E-03
3.0E-02
8.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
Plants
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.3E-01
NC
7.0E-02
2.2E-02
4.3E-01
2.0E-02
3.8E-02
2.2E+00
6.2E-03
1.5E-01
4.4E-03
1.3E+00
NC
6.0E-03
1. 7E-02
5. 7E-01
NC
6.1E-02
2.4E-02
4.4E-01
3.0E-02
6.3E-02
2.4E+00
9.0E-03
1.5E-01
6.9E-03
1.3E+00
NC
7.3E-03
4.0E-02
5.9E-01
NC
8.9E-02
2. 7E-02
4.5E-01
3.0E-02
9.2E-02
3.5E+00
l.OE-02
1.6E-01
6.9E-03
1.3E+00
NC
8.4E-03
4.2E-02
2.0E+00
NC
3.6E-03
8.2E-02
NC
l.OE-01
1.2E-02
1.1E-01
7.4E-03
1.3E-03
7.3E-03
2.8E-03
NC
3.0E-02
8.6E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-6
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-6
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-6
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
3.4E+00
4.1E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-04
l.OE+00
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
4.9E-01
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
3.3E+00
1. 7E-04
9.9E-04
1. 7E-04
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-7
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mallard
Work Area
WAS
WA7
All Work Areas
Utah Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
4.3E-01
5.6E-02
1.4E-02
3.2E-02
2.2E-02
8.7E-02
3.2E+00
5.7E-03
8.7E-03
5.0E-03
2.0E-02
6.8E-03
3.0E-02
1.3E-01
5.0E-03
5.4E-03
5.5E-03
1.1E-02
3.2E-02
3.4E-01
3.1E-03
6.0E-04
2.3E-03
5.4E-03
2.4E-03
1.2E-02
2.1E-01
1.7E-02
7.7E-03
1.2E-02
1.4E-02
4.4E-02
9.8E-01
3.8E-03
2.4E-03
3.0E-03
9.4E-03
3.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.1E+00
2.0E-03
4.5E-02
5.5E-02
6.4E-03
5.8E-02
4.1E-03
6.9E-04
4.0E-03
1.6E-03
1.7E-02
4.8E-03
Surface
Water
7.1E-04
8.2E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.2E-05
1.1E-04
2.0E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.2E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.1E-04
8.2E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.2E-05
1.1E-04
2.0E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.2E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.1E-04
8.2E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.2E-05
1.1E-04
2.0E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.2E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surface/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.3E-01
NC
5.6E-02
1.4E-02
3.2E-02
2.2E-02
8.8E-02
3.2E+00
5.8E-03
8.8E-03
5.1E-03
2.0E-02
NC
6.8E-03
3.0E-02
1.3E-01
NC
5.0E-03
5.5E-03
5. 7E-03
1.1E-02
3.2E-02
3.4E-01
3.1E-03
6.1E-04
2.4E-03
5. 7E-03
NC
2.4E-03
1.2E-02
2.2E-01
NC
1. 7E-02
7.8E-03
1.2E-02
1.4E-02
4.4E-02
9.9E-01
3.8E-03
2.5E-03
3.0E-03
9. 7E-03
NC
3.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.1E+00
NC
2.0E-03
4.5E-02
NC
5.5E-02
6.4E-03
5.8E-02
4.1E-03
6.9E-04
4.0E-03
1.6E-03
NC
1. 7E-02
4.8E-03
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-8
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.2E+00
9.6E-02
6.0E-02
1.3E-01
7.7E-02
2.3E-01
7.7E+00
2.6E-02
1.7E-02
1.8E-02
3.3E-02
2.3E-02
1.1E-01
2.3E+00
5.1E-02
5.8E-02
1.2E-01
1.1E-01
1.2E-01
3.6E+00
2.7E-02
l.OE-02
2.3E-02
1.3E-02
3.7E-02
6.3E-02
1.5E+00
2.0E-01
5.2E-02
1.4E-01
7.8E-02
3.2E-01
1.2E+01
2.3E-02
3.1E-02
1.9E-02
6.9E-02
2.7E-02
1.2E-01
1.5E+00
3.9E-01
1.3E-01
1.5E-01
8.7E-02
3.5E-01
1.3E+01
3.3E-02
3.7E-02
2.1E-02
7.7E-02
2.6E-02
1.3E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
NC
1. 7E-01
6.0E-02
8.4E-01
7. 7E-02
2.3E-01
9.5E+00
2.6E-02
1. 7E-02
1.8E-02
2.3E+00
NC
2.3E-02
1.1E-01
2.6E+00
NC
1.2E-01
5.9E-02
8.2E-01
1.1E-01
1.2E-01
5.5E+00
2. 7E-02
l.OE-02
2.3E-02
2.3E+00
NC
3. 7E-02
6.3E-02
1.7E+00
NC
2. 7E-01
5.2E-02
8.5E-01
7.8E-02
3.2E-01
1.4E+01
2.3E-02
3.1E-02
1.9E-02
2.4E+00
NC
2. 7E-02
1.2E-01
1.7E+00
NC
4.6E-01
1.3E-01
8.5E-01
8. 7E-02
3.5E-01
1.5E+01
3.3E-02
3. 7E-02
2.1E-02
2.4E+00
NC
2.6E-02
1.3E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-8
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.7E+00
2.6E-01
9.0E-02
1.8E-01
l.OE-01
5.2E-01
1.3E+01
4.4E-02
6.6E-02
2.0E-02
8.1E-02
3.2E-02
2.7E-01
1.2E+00
8.8E-02
4.2E-02
9.7E-02
6.4E-02
1.9E-01
7.3E+00
2.0E-02
1.5E-02
1.6E-02
4.0E-02
2.1E-02
6.4E-02
9.9E-01
9.1E-02
5.0E-02
8.3E-02
7.3E-02
5.5E-01
4.8E+00
3.2E-02
1.1E-02
1.8E-02
3.7E-02
1.6E-02
2.1E-01
9.0E-01
5.5E-02
4.3E-02
1.9E-02
5.9E-02
8.3E-02
1.8E+00
2.5E-02
2.3E-03
1.3E-02
7.6E-03
1.6E-02
4.4E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.0E+00
NC
3.3E-01
9.0E-02
8.9E-01
l.OE-01
5.2E-01
1.5E+01
4.4E-02
6.6E-02
2.0E-02
2.4E+00
NC
3.2E-02
2.8E-01
1.4E+00
NC
1.6E-01
4.3E-02
8.0E-01
6.4E-02
1.9E-01
9.2E+00
2.0E-02
1.5E-02
1.6E-02
2.3E+00
NC
2.1E-02
6.5E-02
1.2E+00
NC
1.6E-01
5.1E-02
7.9E-01
7.3E-02
5.5E-01
6.7E+00
3.2E-02
1.1E-02
1.9E-02
2.3E+00
NC
1.6E-02
2.1E-01
1.2E+00
NC
1.3E-01
4.3E-02
7.3E-01
5.9E-02
8.3E-02
3.7E+00
2.5E-02
2.4E-03
1.3E-02
2.3E+00
NC
1.6E-02
4.4E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-8
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
8.1E-01
9.4E-02
5.5E-02
2.3E-02
4.8E-02
9.2E-02
3.5E+00
1.5E-02
4.6E-03
l.OE-02
1.6E-02
1.5E-02
4.2E-02
1.2E+00
7.2E-02
5.7E-02
5.4E-02
7.3E-02
1.5E-01
4.0E+00
2.2E-02
7.6E-03
1.7E-02
1.9E-02
1.8E-02
9.8E-02
1.2E+00
1.4E-01
6.5E-02
8.2E-02
7.2E-02
2.3E-01
6.5E+00
2.5E-02
1.7E-02
1.7E-02
3.6E-02
2.1E-02
l.OE-01
5.0E+00
8.7E-03
2.0E-01
2.5E-01
2.8E-02
2.6E-01
1.8E-02
3.1E-03
1.8E-02
7.0E-03
7.4E-02
2.1E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+00
NC
1. 7E-01
5.5E-02
7.3E-01
4.8E-02
9.2E-02
5.3E+00
1.5E-02
4. 7E-03
1.1E-02
2.3E+00
NC
1.5E-02
4.2E-02
1.4E+00
NC
1.4E-01
5. 7E-02
7.6E-01
7.3E-02
1.6E-01
5.8E+00
2.2E-02
7.6E-03
1. 7E-02
2.3E+00
NC
1.8E-02
9.8E-02
1.5E+00
NC
2.1E-01
6.5E-02
7.9E-01
7.3E-02
2.3E-01
8.4E+00
2.5E-02
1. 7E-02
1. 7E-02
2.3E+00
NC
2.1E-02
l.OE-01
5.0E+00
NC
8. 7E-03
2.0E-01
NC
2.5E-01
2.8E-02
2.6E-01
1.8E-02
3.1E-03
1.8E-02
7.0E-03
NC
7.4E-02
2.1E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-9
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.6E+00
2.0E-01
1.3E-01
2.8E-01
1.6E-01
4.9E-01
1.6E+01
5.3E-02
3.6E-02
3.7E-02
7.0E-02
4.8E-02
2.2E-01
4.8E+00
1.1E-01
1.2E-01
2.4E-01
2.4E-01
2.5E-01
7.5E+00
5.6E-02
2.1E-02
4.7E-02
2.8E-02
7.7E-02
1.3E-01
3.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.1E-01
2.9E-01
1.6E-01
6.6E-01
2.5E+01
4.8E-02
6.4E-02
3.9E-02
1.4E-01
5.7E-02
2.5E-01
3.1E+00
8.1E-01
2.8E-01
3.1E-01
1.8E-01
7.3E-01
2.7E+01
6.8E-02
7.8E-02
4.4E-02
1.6E-01
5.3E-02
2.7E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
Plants
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.1E+00
NC
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
2.1E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-01
2.0E+01
5.3E-02
4.2E-01
3. 7E-02
5.9E+00
NC
4.8E-02
2.2E-01
5.4E+00
NC
2. 7E-01
1.2E-01
2.1E+00
2.4E-01
2.5E-01
1.2E+01
5.6E-02
4.1E-01
4. 7E-02
5.8E+00
NC
7. 7E-02
1.3E-01
3.6E+00
NC
5.8E-01
1.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.6E-01
6.6E-01
2.9E+01
4.8E-02
4.5E-01
3.9E-02
5.9E+00
NC
5. 7E-02
2.5E-01
3.6E+00
NC
9. 7E-01
2.8E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E-01
7.3E-01
3.1E+01
6.8E-02
4. 7E-01
4.4E-02
5.9E+00
NC
5.3E-02
2. 7E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-9
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.6E+00
5.4E-01
1.9E-01
3.8E-01
2.1E-01
1.1E+00
2.7E+01
9.3E-02
1.4E-01
4.2E-02
1.7E-01
6.6E-02
5.7E-01
2.4E+00
1.8E-01
8.9E-02
2.0E-01
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
1.5E+01
4.1E-02
3.2E-02
3.3E-02
8.3E-02
4.3E-02
1.3E-01
2.1E+00
1.9E-01
l.OE-01
1.7E-01
1.5E-01
1.1E+00
l.OE+01
6.6E-02
2.3E-02
3.9E-02
7.8E-02
3.4E-02
4.3E-01
1.9E+00
1.1E-01
8.9E-02
4.0E-02
1.2E-01
1.7E-01
3.8E+00
5.1E-02
4.9E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-02
3.4E-02
9.1E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
Plants
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.1E+00
NC
7.0E-01
1.9E-01
2.2E+00
2.1E-01
1.1E+00
3.1E+01
9.3E-02
5.2E-01
4.2E-02
6.0E+00
NC
6.6E-02
5. 7E-01
2.9E+00
NC
3.4E-01
8.9E-02
2.0E+00
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
1.9E+01
4.1E-02
4.2E-01
3.3E-02
5.9E+00
NC
4.3E-02
1.3E-01
2.6E+00
NC
3.5E-01
1.1E-01
2.0E+00
1.5E-01
1.1E+00
1.4E+01
6.6E-02
4.1E-01
3.9E-02
5.9E+00
NC
3.4E-02
4.3E-01
2.4E+00
NC
2. 7E-01
9.0E-02
1.9E+00
1.2E-01
1. 7E-01
7.9E+00
5.2E-02
3.9E-01
2.8E-02
5.8E+00
NC
3.4E-02
9.1E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-9
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.7E+00
2.0E-01
1.1E-01
4.7E-02
l.OE-01
1.9E-01
7.2E+00
3.2E-02
9.7E-03
2.2E-02
3.3E-02
3.1E-02
8.7E-02
2.4E+00
1.5E-01
1.2E-01
1.1E-01
1.5E-01
3.2E-01
8.3E+00
4.6E-02
1.6E-02
3.4E-02
3.9E-02
3.7E-02
2.0E-01
2.5E+00
2.9E-01
1.4E-01
1.7E-01
1.5E-01
4.7E-01
1.4E+01
5.2E-02
3.5E-02
3.5E-02
7.5E-02
4.3E-02
2.1E-01
l.OE+01
1.8E-02
4.2E-01
5.1E-01
5.9E-02
5.4E-01
3.8E-02
6.4E-03
3.7E-02
1.5E-02
1.5E-01
4.4E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-03
2.0E-04
3.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
4.9E-03
4.4E-05
4.2E-05
1.5E-04
7.7E-04
5.3E-05
1.8E-04
Plants
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
2.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
3.4E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
3.7E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.2E+00
NC
3.6E-01
1.1E-01
1.9E+00
l.OE-01
1.9E-01
1.1E+01
3.2E-02
4.0E-01
2.2E-02
5.8E+00
NC
3.1E-02
8. 7E-02
2.9E+00
NC
3.1E-01
1.2E-01
1.9E+00
1.5E-01
3.2E-01
1.2E+01
4.6E-02
4.0E-01
3.5E-02
5.8E+00
NC
3. 7E-02
2.0E-01
3.0E+00
NC
4.5E-01
1.4E-01
2.0E+00
1.5E-01
4. 7E-01
1.8E+01
5.2E-02
4.2E-01
3.5E-02
5.9E+00
NC
4.3E-02
2.1E-01
l.OE+01
NC
1.8E-02
4.2E-01
NC
5.1E-01
5.9E-02
5.4E-01
3.8E-02
6.4E-03
3. 7E-02
1.5E-02
NC
1.5E-01
4.4E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-10
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
7.5E+01
3.0E+00
2.9E+00
1.2E-01
8.6E-01
8.8E-02
2.1E-01
9.0E+00
4.5E-01
1.2E-02
2.6E-01
2.1E-01
5.1E-02
1.3E+00
3.1E-01
1.4E+02
1.8E+00
1.5E+00
1.1E-01
7.5E-01
1.3E-01
1.1E-01
4.2E+00
4.7E-01
7.0E-03
3.3E-01
8.5E-02
4.3E-02
2.1E+00
1.8E-01
9.0E+01
5.9E+00
6.1E+00
9.9E-02
8.9E-01
8.9E-02
2.9E-01
1.4E+01
4.0E-01
2.1E-02
2.7E-01
4.4E-01
5.3E-02
1.6E+00
3.6E-01
8.9E+01
6.1E+00
1.2E+01
2.5E-01
9.4E-01
9.9E-02
3.1E-01
1.5E+01
5.8E-01
2.6E-02
3.1E-01
4.9E-01
7.8E-02
1.5E+00
3.7E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
LIE-OS
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
8.3E+01
3.8E+00
4.0E+00
1.2E-01
3.1E+00
8.8E-02
2.1E-01
l.OE+01
4.5E-01
1.2E-02
2.6E-01
7.5E+00
5.1E-02
1.3E+00
3.1E-01
1.5E+02
2.7E+00
2.6E+00
1.1E-01
3.0E+00
1.3E-01
1.1E-01
5.3E+00
4. 7E-01
7.0E-03
3.3E-01
7.4E+00
4.4E-02
2.1E+00
1.8E-01
9.8E+01
6.8E+00
7.2E+00
l.OE-01
3.2E+00
8.9E-02
2.9E-01
1.5E+01
4.0E-01
2.2E-02
2. 7E-01
7.7E+00
5.3E-02
1.6E+00
3.6E-01
9.7E+01
7.0E+00
1.3E+01
2.5E-01
3.2E+00
l.OE-01
3.2E-01
1.6E+01
5.8E-01
2.6E-02
3.1E-01
7.8E+00
7.9E-02
1.5E+00
3. 7E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-10
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.1E+02
6.8E+00
7.8E+00
1.7E-01
1.2E+00
1.2E-01
4.7E-01
1.5E+01
7.9E-01
4.6E-02
2.9E-01
5.1E-01
9.9E-02
1.8E+00
8.0E-01
7.0E+01
3.2E+00
2.7E+00
8.1E-02
6.2E-01
7.3E-02
1.7E-01
8.5E+00
3.5E-01
1.1E-02
2.3E-01
2.5E-01
3.2E-02
1.2E+00
1.9E-01
6.0E+01
2.7E+00
2.8E+00
9.6E-02
5.3E-01
8.3E-02
4.9E-01
5.6E+00
5.6E-01
7.8E-03
2.7E-01
2.4E-01
5.3E-02
9.4E-01
6.0E-01
5.4E+01
6.0E-01
1.7E+00
8.2E-02
1.2E-01
6.8E-02
7.5E-02
2.1E+00
4.4E-01
1.6E-03
1.9E-01
4.8E-02
2.9E-02
9.5E-01
1.3E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
LIE-OS
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+02
7.7E+00
8.9E+00
1. 7E-01
3.5E+00
1.2E-01
4. 7E-01
1.6E+01
7.9E-01
4.6E-02
2.9E-01
7.8E+00
9.9E-02
1.8E+00
8.0E-01
7.8E+01
4.0E+00
3.8E+00
8.2E-02
2.9E+00
7.3E-02
1. 7E-01
9.6E+00
3.5E-01
1.1E-02
2.3E-01
7.5E+00
3.2E-02
1.2E+00
1.9E-01
6.8E+01
3.6E+00
3.9E+00
9. 7E-02
2.8E+00
8.3E-02
4.9E-01
6.7E+00
5.6E-01
7.8E-03
2. 7E-01
7.5E+00
5.3E-02
9.4E-01
6.0E-01
6.2E+01
1.5E+00
2.8E+00
8.2E-02
2.4E+00
6.8E-02
7.5E-02
3.2E+00
4.4E-01
1. 7E-03
1.9E-01
7.3E+00
2.9E-02
9.5E-01
1.3E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-10
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.9E+01
1.8E+00
2.8E+00
l.OE-01
1.5E-01
5.5E-02
8.3E-02
4.0E+00
2.7E-01
3.3E-03
1.5E-01
l.OE-01
2.9E-02
8.5E-01
1.2E-01
7.0E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
1.1E-01
3.5E-01
8.4E-02
1.4E-01
4.7E+00
3.9E-01
5.3E-03
2.4E-01
1.2E-01
3.1E-02
l.OE+00
2.8E-01
7.3E+01
3.0E+00
4.2E+00
1.2E-01
5.3E-01
8.3E-02
2.0E-01
7.6E+00
4.4E-01
1.2E-02
2.4E-01
2.3E-01
4.5E-02
1.2E+00
3.0E-01
3.0E+02
7.3E-01
2.6E-01
3.9E-01
2.8E-01
2.5E-02
3.0E-01
3.2E-01
2.2E-03
2.6E-01
4.4E-02
4.0E-01
4.2E+00
6.2E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
3.8E-02
7.4E-03
2.2E-03
2.4E-04
6.8E-04
6.4E-05
8.7E-05
2.1E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-05
8.0E-04
1.8E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
2.0E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
7.5E+00
8.9E-01
1.1E+00
2.3E+00
1.1E+00
7.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.7E+01
2.7E+00
3.9E+00
l.OE-01
2.4E+00
5.5E-02
8.3E-02
5.1E+00
2. 7E-01
3.3E-03
1.5E-01
7.4E+00
2.9E-02
8.5E-01
1.2E-01
7.8E+01
2.6E+00
3.3E+00
1.1E-01
2.6E+00
8.4E-02
1.4E-01
5.7E+00
3.9E-01
5.3E-03
2.4E-01
7.4E+00
3.1E-02
l.OE+00
2.9E-01
8.0E+01
3.9E+00
5.3E+00
1.2E-01
2.8E+00
8.3E-02
2.0E-01
8.7E+00
4.4E-01
1.2E-02
2.4E-01
7.5E+00
4.5E-02
1.2E+00
3.0E-01
3.0E+02
7.3E-01
2.6E-01
3.9E-01
NC
2.8E-01
2.5E-02
3.0E-01
3.2E-01
2.2E-03
2.6E-01
4.4E-02
4.0E-01
4.2E+00
6.2E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-ll
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.3E+00
1.3E-01
1.3E-01
5.0E-03
3.8E-02
3.9E-03
9.2E-03
3.9E-01
2.0E-02
5.3E-04
1.1E-02
9.2E-03
2.2E-03
5.8E-02
1.4E-02
6.2E+00
7.9E-02
6.8E-02
4.9E-03
3.3E-02
5.7E-03
4.8E-03
1.8E-01
2.1E-02
3.1E-04
1.4E-02
3.7E-03
1.9E-03
9.3E-02
8.0E-03
3.9E+00
2.6E-01
2.7E-01
4.3E-03
3.9E-02
3.9E-03
1.3E-02
6.1E-01
1.8E-02
9.4E-04
1.2E-02
1.9E-02
2.3E-03
6.9E-02
1.6E-02
3.9E+00
2.7E-01
5.2E-01
1.1E-02
4.1E-02
4.3E-03
1.4E-02
6.7E-01
2.5E-02
1.1E-03
1.3E-02
2.1E-02
3.4E-03
6.5E-02
1.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.3E+00
4.6E-01
4.5E-01
5.2E-03
8.1E-01
3.9E-03
9.3E-03
7.1E-01
2.0E-02
7.8E-03
1.2E-02
2.4E+00
2.4E-03
5.9E-02
1.4E-02
8.2E+00
4.1E-01
3.9E-01
5.1E-03
8.1E-01
5.8E-03
4.9E-03
5.0E-01
2.1E-02
7.6E-03
1.5E-02
2.4E+00
2.1E-03
9.4E-02
8.2E-03
6.0E+00
5.9E-01
5.9E-01
4.6E-03
8.2E-01
4.0E-03
1.3E-02
9.3E-01
1.8E-02
8.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.4E+00
2.5E-03
7.0E-02
1.6E-02
6.0E+00
5.9E-01
8.4E-01
1.1E-02
8.2E-01
4.4E-03
1.4E-02
9.8E-01
2.5E-02
8.4E-03
1.4E-02
2.4E+00
3.6E-03
6.6E-02
1.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-ll
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.6E+00
3.0E-01
3.4E-01
7.6E-03
5.2E-02
5.0E-03
2.1E-02
6.7E-01
3.4E-02
2.0E-03
1.3E-02
2.2E-02
4.3E-03
8.0E-02
3.5E-02
3.1E+00
1.4E-01
1.2E-01
3.6E-03
2.7E-02
3.2E-03
7.5E-03
3.7E-01
1.5E-02
4.6E-04
l.OE-02
1.1E-02
1.4E-03
5.2E-02
8.2E-03
2.6E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E-01
4.2E-03
2.3E-02
3.6E-03
2.1E-02
2.5E-01
2.4E-02
3.4E-04
1.2E-02
l.OE-02
2.3E-03
4.1E-02
2.6E-02
2.4E+00
2.6E-02
7.2E-02
3.6E-03
5.3E-03
3.0E-03
3.3E-03
9.4E-02
1.9E-02
7.2E-05
8.4E-03
2.1E-03
1.2E-03
4.1E-02
5.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
6.7E+00
6.2E-01
6.6E-01
7.8E-03
8.3E-01
5.1E-03
2.1E-02
9.8E-01
3.5E-02
9.3E-03
1.3E-02
2.4E+00
4.5E-03
8.1E-02
3.5E-02
5.1E+00
4. 7E-01
4.4E-01
3.8E-03
8.0E-01
3.3E-03
7.6E-03
6.9E-01
1.6E-02
7. 7E-03
1.1E-02
2.4E+00
1.6E-03
5.3E-02
8.4E-03
4.7E+00
4.4E-01
4.4E-01
4.4E-03
8.0E-01
3. 7E-03
2.2E-02
5.6E-01
2.5E-02
7.6E-03
1.2E-02
2.4E+00
2.5E-03
4.2E-02
2.6E-02
4.4E+00
3.5E-01
3.9E-01
3.8E-03
7.8E-01
3.0E-03
3.3E-03
4.1E-01
1.9E-02
7.3E-03
9.1E-03
2.4E+00
1.4E-03
4.2E-02
5. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table A-ll
HQ TYPE A: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.2E+00
8.0E-02
1.2E-01
4.6E-03
6.4E-03
2.4E-03
3.6E-03
1.8E-01
1.2E-02
1.4E-04
6.6E-03
4.4E-03
1.3E-03
3.7E-02
5.3E-03
3.1E+00
7.7E-02
9.5E-02
4.8E-03
1.5E-02
3.7E-03
6.1E-03
2.0E-01
1.7E-02
2.3E-04
l.OE-02
5.2E-03
1.4E-03
4.5E-02
1.2E-02
3.2E+00
1.3E-01
1.9E-01
5.4E-03
2.3E-02
3.6E-03
8.9E-03
3.3E-01
1.9E-02
5.1E-04
1.1E-02
9.9E-03
2.0E-03
5.2E-02
1.3E-02
1.3E+01
3.2E-02
1.2E-02
1.7E-02
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
1.3E-02
1.4E-02
9.5E-05
1.1E-02
1.9E-03
1.8E-02
1.9E-01
2.7E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
3.3E-02
6.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.8E-04
5.5E-05
7.5E-05
1.8E-03
2.5E-04
9.3E-06
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.7E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
9.8E-01
2.0E-01
1.7E-01
4.6E-01
1.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.4E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.2E+00
4.1E-01
4.4E-01
4.8E-03
7.8E-01
2.5E-03
3. 7E-03
4.9E-01
1.2E-02
7.4E-03
7.3E-03
2.4E+00
1.4E-03
3.8E-02
5.5E-03
5.1E+00
4.0E-01
4.2E-01
5.0E-03
7.9E-01
3. 7E-03
6.2E-03
5.2E-01
1. 7E-02
7.5E-03
1.1E-02
2.4E+00
1.5E-03
4.6E-02
1.3E-02
5.2E+00
4.6E-01
5.1E-01
5.6E-03
8.0E-01
3. 7E-03
8.9E-03
6.5E-01
1.9E-02
7.8E-03
1.1E-02
2.4E+00
2.1E-03
5.3E-02
1.3E-02
1.3E+01
3.2E-02
1.2E-02
1. 7E-02
NC
1.2E-02
LIE-OS
1.3E-02
1.4E-02
9.5E-05
1.1E-02
1.9E-03
1.8E-02
1.9E-01
2. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type A.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-l
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WA3
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
5.5E-02
4.2E-03
2.7E-03
6.0E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE-02
3.4E-01
1.1E-03
7.7E-04
7.9E-04
1.5E-03
l.OE-03
4.7E-03
l.OE-01
2.3E-03
2.6E-03
5.2E-03
5.0E-03
5.4E-03
1.6E-01
1.2E-03
4.4E-04
l.OE-03
6.0E-04
1.6E-03
2.8E-03
6.6E-02
9.0E-03
2.3E-03
6.1E-03
3.5E-03
1.4E-02
5.3E-01
l.OE-03
1.4E-03
8.3E-04
3.1E-03
1.2E-03
5.4E-03
6.5E-02
1.7E-02
5.9E-03
6.5E-03
3.8E-03
1.6E-02
5.8E-01
1.4E-03
1.7E-03
9.3E-04
3.4E-03
1.1E-03
5.7E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.6E-02
NC
4.3E-03
2.8E-03
6.1E-03
3.5E-03
l.OE-02
3.4E-01
1.2E-03
7.9E-04
8.5E-04
1.8E-03
NC
l.OE-03
4.8E-03
l.OE-01
NC
2.4E-03
2. 7E-03
5.3E-03
5.1E-03
5.5E-03
1.6E-01
1.2E-03
4.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.2E-04
NC
1. 7E-03
2.9E-03
6. 7E-02
NC
9.0E-03
2.4E-03
6.2E-03
3.5E-03
1.4E-02
5.4E-01
l.OE-03
1.4E-03
8.9E-04
3.4E-03
NC
1.2E-03
5.5E-03
6.6E-02
NC
1. 7E-02
6.0E-03
6.6E-03
3.9E-03
1.6E-02
5.8E-01
1.5E-03
1. 7E-03
l.OE-03
3. 7E-03
NC
1.2E-03
5. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-l
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
7.7E-02
1.1E-02
4.0E-03
8.2E-03
4.5E-03
2.3E-02
5.8E-01
2.0E-03
2.9E-03
8.9E-04
3.6E-03
1.4E-03
1.2E-02
5.1E-02
3.9E-03
1.9E-03
4.3E-03
2.8E-03
8.5E-03
3.2E-01
8.8E-04
6.7E-04
7.0E-04
1.8E-03
9.2E-04
2.9E-03
4.4E-02
4.0E-03
2.2E-03
3.7E-03
3.2E-03
2.4E-02
2.1E-01
1.4E-03
4.9E-04
8.2E-04
1.7E-03
7.2E-04
9.1E-03
4.0E-02
2.4E-03
1.9E-03
8.4E-04
2.6E-03
3.7E-03
8.1E-02
1.1E-03
l.OE-04
5.9E-04
3.4E-04
7.3E-04
1.9E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.8E-02
NC
1.1E-02
4.1E-03
8.3E-03
4.5E-03
2.3E-02
5.8E-01
2.0E-03
2.9E-03
9.5E-04
3.9E-03
NC
1.4E-03
1.2E-02
5.2E-02
NC
4.0E-03
2.0E-03
4.4E-03
2.9E-03
8.6E-03
3.3E-01
9.0E-04
6.9E-04
7.6E-04
2.1E-03
NC
9.4E-04
2.9E-03
4.5E-02
NC
4.1E-03
2.4E-03
3.8E-03
3.3E-03
2.4E-02
2.2E-01
1.4E-03
5.1E-04
8.8E-04
2.0E-03
NC
7.4E-04
9.2E-03
4.1E-02
NC
2.5E-03
2.0E-03
9.6E-04
2. 7E-03
3.8E-03
8.3E-02
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
6.5E-04
6.6E-04
NC
7.5E-04
2.0E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-l
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.6E-02
4.2E-03
2.4E-03
l.OE-03
2.1E-03
4.1E-03
1.5E-01
6.7E-04
2.1E-04
4.6E-04
7.1E-04
6.5E-04
1.8E-03
5.1E-02
3.2E-03
2.5E-03
2.4E-03
3.2E-03
6.9E-03
1.8E-01
9.8E-04
3.4E-04
7.3E-04
8.3E-04
7.9E-04
4.3E-03
5.3E-02
6.2E-03
2.9E-03
3.7E-03
3.2E-03
l.OE-02
2.9E-01
1.1E-03
7.4E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-03
9.1E-04
4.5E-03
2.2E-01
3.9E-04
8.9E-03
1.1E-02
1.3E-03
1.2E-02
8.1E-04
1.4E-04
7.9E-04
3.1E-04
3.3E-03
9.4E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.2E-04
8.3E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.3E-05
1.1E-04
2.1E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.3E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3. 7E-02
NC
4.3E-03
2.6E-03
LIE-OS
2.2E-03
4.2E-03
1.6E-01
6.9E-04
2.2E-04
5.3E-04
l.OE-03
NC
6. 7E-04
1.9E-03
5.2E-02
NC
3.3E-03
2. 7E-03
2.5E-03
3.3E-03
7.0E-03
1.8E-01
9.9E-04
3.5E-04
8.0E-04
1.2E-03
NC
8.1E-04
4.4E-03
5.4E-02
NC
6.3E-03
3.0E-03
3.8E-03
3.3E-03
l.OE-02
2.9E-01
1.1E-03
7.5E-04
8.0E-04
1.9E-03
NC
9.4E-04
4.6E-03
2.2E-01
NC
3.9E-04
8.9E-03
NC
1.1E-02
1.3E-03
1.2E-02
8.1E-04
1.4E-04
7.9E-04
3.1E-04
NC
3.3E-03
9.4E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-2
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.9E-01
2.7E-02
2.7E-02
1.1E-03
8.0E-03
8.1E-04
1.9E-03
8.2E-02
4.2E-03
1.1E-04
2.4E-03
1.9E-03
4.7E-04
1.2E-02
2.9E-03
1.3E+00
1.7E-02
1.4E-02
l.OE-03
6.9E-03
1.2E-03
l.OE-03
3.9E-02
4.4E-03
6.5E-05
3.0E-03
7.9E-04
4.0E-04
2.0E-02
1.7E-03
8.3E-01
5.4E-02
5.6E-02
9.1E-04
8.2E-03
8.2E-04
2.6E-03
1.3E-01
3.7E-03
2.0E-04
2.5E-03
4.0E-03
4.9E-04
1.5E-02
3.3E-03
8.2E-01
5.6E-02
1.1E-01
2.3E-03
8.7E-03
9.1E-04
2.9E-03
1.4E-01
5.3E-03
2.4E-04
2.8E-03
4.5E-03
7.2E-04
1.4E-02
3.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
Plants
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+OO
9.0E-02
7.9E-02
1.1E-03
1.5E-01
8.3E-04
2.0E-03
1.3E-01
4.2E-03
2.3E-03
2.6E-03
4.4E-01
5.2E-04
1.2E-02
2.9E-03
1.6E+00
8.0E-02
6.6E-02
1.1E-03
1.5E-01
1.2E-03
l.OE-03
9.0E-02
4.4E-03
2.3E-03
3.2E-03
4.4E-01
4.5E-04
2.0E-02
1. 7E-03
1.1E+00
1.2E-01
1.1E-01
9.8E-04
1.5E-01
8.4E-04
2. 7E-03
1.8E-01
3.8E-03
2.4E-03
2. 7E-03
4.4E-01
5.4E-04
1.5E-02
3.3E-03
1.1E+00
1.2E-01
1.6E-01
2.4E-03
1.5E-01
9.3E-04
2.9E-03
1.9E-01
5.4E-03
2.5E-03
3.0E-03
4.4E-01
7. 7E-04
1.4E-02
3.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-2
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.7E-01
6.2E-02
7.1E-02
1.6E-03
1.1E-02
1.1E-03
4.3E-03
1.4E-01
7.2E-03
4.2E-04
2.7E-03
4.7E-03
9.1E-04
1.7E-02
7.4E-03
6.4E-01
2.9E-02
2.4E-02
7.5E-04
5.7E-03
6.7E-04
1.6E-03
7.9E-02
3.2E-03
9.8E-05
2.1E-03
2.3E-03
2.9E-04
1.1E-02
1.7E-03
5.5E-01
2.5E-02
2.5E-02
8.9E-04
4.9E-03
7.7E-04
4.5E-03
5.2E-02
5.1E-03
7.2E-05
2.5E-03
2.2E-03
4.9E-04
8.6E-03
5.5E-03
5.0E-01
5.5E-03
1.5E-02
7.5E-04
1.1E-03
6.2E-04
6.9E-04
2.0E-02
4.0E-03
1.5E-05
1.8E-03
4.4E-04
2.6E-04
8.7E-03
1.2E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
Plants
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.3E+00
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
1. 7E-03
1.5E-01
1.1E-03
4.4E-03
1.9E-01
7.3E-03
2. 7E-03
2.9E-03
4.4E-01
9.6E-04
1. 7E-02
7.4E-03
9.6E-01
9.2E-02
7.6E-02
8.1E-04
1.5E-01
6.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.3E-01
3.3E-03
2.3E-03
2.3E-03
4.4E-01
3.4E-04
1.1E-02
1.8E-03
8.6E-01
8.8E-02
7. 7E-02
9.5E-04
1.5E-01
7.8E-04
4.5E-03
l.OE-01
5.2E-03
2.3E-03
2. 7E-03
4.4E-01
5.4E-04
8.9E-03
5.6E-03
8.1E-01
6.9E-02
6. 7E-02
8.2E-04
1.4E-01
6.4E-04
7.1E-04
7.1E-02
4.1E-03
2.2E-03
2.0E-03
4.4E-01
3.1E-04
9.0E-03
1.2E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-2
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.5E-01
1.7E-02
2.6E-02
9.6E-04
1.3E-03
5.1E-04
7.6E-04
3.7E-02
2.5E-03
3.0E-05
1.4E-03
9.3E-04
2.6E-04
7.8E-03
1.1E-03
6.4E-01
1.6E-02
2.0E-02
l.OE-03
3.2E-03
7.7E-04
1.3E-03
4.3E-02
3.6E-03
4.9E-05
2.2E-03
1.1E-03
2.9E-04
9.5E-03
2.6E-03
6.7E-01
2.8E-02
3.9E-02
1.1E-03
4.9E-03
7.6E-04
1.9E-03
7.0E-02
4.0E-03
1.1E-04
2.2E-03
2.1E-03
4.1E-04
1.1E-02
2.7E-03
2.8E+00
6.7E-03
2.4E-03
3.5E-03
2.6E-03
2.3E-04
2.8E-03
3.0E-03
2.0E-05
2.4E-03
4.1E-04
3.7E-03
3.9E-02
5.7E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
6.3E-05
1.8E-04
1.7E-05
2.3E-05
5.6E-04
7.5E-05
2.8E-06
2.1E-04
4.7E-04
5.2E-05
2.9E-04
5.2E-05
Plants
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
3.0E-01
6.1E-02
5.1E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
2.2E-03
4.4E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7. 7E-01
8.0E-02
7.8E-02
l.OE-03
1.4E-01
5.3E-04
7.8E-04
8.8E-02
2.5E-03
2.3E-03
1.6E-03
4.4E-01
3.2E-04
8.1E-03
1.2E-03
9.6E-01
7.9E-02
7.2E-02
1.1E-03
1.5E-01
7.9E-04
1.3E-03
9.4E-02
3. 7E-03
2.3E-03
2.4E-03
4.4E-01
3.4E-04
9.8E-03
2. 7E-03
9.8E-01
9.1E-02
9.1E-02
1.2E-03
1.5E-01
7.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.2E-01
4.1E-03
2.3E-03
2.4E-03
4.4E-01
4.6E-04
1.1E-02
2.8E-03
2.8E+00
6. 7E-03
2.4E-03
3.5E-03
NC
2.6E-03
2.3E-04
2.8E-03
3.0E-03
2.0E-05
2.4E-03
4.1E-04
3. 7E-03
3.9E-02
5. 7E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.7E+00
1.1E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
3.1E-02
3.2E-03
7.5E-03
3.2E-01
1.6E-02
4.4E-04
9.2E-03
7.6E-03
1.8E-03
4.8E-02
1.1E-02
5.1E+00
6.5E-02
5.6E-02
4.0E-03
2.7E-02
4.7E-03
3.9E-03
1.5E-01
1.7E-02
2.5E-04
1.2E-02
3.1E-03
1.6E-03
7.6E-02
6.6E-03
3.2E+00
2.1E-01
2.2E-01
3.6E-03
3.2E-02
3.2E-03
l.OE-02
5.0E-01
1.5E-02
7.7E-04
9.7E-03
1.6E-02
1.9E-03
5.7E-02
1.3E-02
3.2E+00
2.2E-01
4.2E-01
9.1E-03
3.4E-02
3.6E-03
1.1E-02
5.5E-01
2.1E-02
9.4E-04
1.1E-02
1.7E-02
2.8E-03
5.3E-02
1.3E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
Plants
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.8E+00
1.4E-01
1.3E-01
4.3E-03
9.1E-02
3.2E-03
7.6E-03
3.4E-01
1.6E-02
1.4E-03
9. 7E-03
1.9E-01
1.9E-03
4.8E-02
1.1E-02
5.2E+00
9.4E-02
7.8E-02
4.1E-03
8. 7E-02
4. 7E-03
4.0E-03
1. 7E-01
1. 7E-02
1.2E-03
1.2E-02
1.9E-01
1. 7E-03
7. 7E-02
6. 7E-03
3.4E+00
2.4E-01
2.4E-01
3. 7E-03
9.2E-02
3.2E-03
l.OE-02
5.3E-01
1.5E-02
1. 7E-03
l.OE-02
2.0E-01
2.0E-03
5. 7E-02
1.3E-02
3.3E+00
2.5E-01
4.5E-01
9.2E-03
9.4E-02
3.6E-03
1.1E-02
5. 7E-01
2.1E-02
1.9E-03
1.1E-02
2.0E-01
2.9E-03
5.4E-02
1.3E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.8E+00
2.4E-01
2.8E-01
6.2E-03
4.3E-02
4.1E-03
1.7E-02
5.5E-01
2.8E-02
1.7E-03
l.OE-02
1.8E-02
3.6E-03
6.6E-02
2.9E-02
2.5E+00
1.1E-01
9.5E-02
2.9E-03
2.2E-02
2.6E-03
6.2E-03
3.1E-01
1.3E-02
3.8E-04
8.2E-03
9.1E-03
1.1E-03
4.3E-02
6.7E-03
2.2E+00
9.6E-02
9.9E-02
3.5E-03
1.9E-02
3.0E-03
1.8E-02
2.0E-01
2.0E-02
2.8E-04
9.6E-03
8.5E-03
1.9E-03
3.4E-02
2.1E-02
2.0E+00
2.2E-02
5.9E-02
2.9E-03
4.4E-03
2.4E-03
2.7E-03
7.7E-02
1.6E-02
5.9E-05
6.9E-03
1.7E-03
l.OE-03
3.4E-02
4.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
Plants
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.9E+00
2. 7E-01
3.0E-01
6.3E-03
l.OE-01
4.2E-03
1. 7E-02
5. 7E-01
2.8E-02
2.6E-03
1.1E-02
2.0E-01
3. 7E-03
6.6E-02
2.9E-02
2.7E+00
1.4E-01
1.2E-01
3.0E-03
8.2E-02
2. 7E-03
6.2E-03
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
1.3E-03
8.6E-03
1.9E-01
1.2E-03
4.3E-02
6.8E-03
2.3E+00
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
3.6E-03
7.9E-02
3.0E-03
1.8E-02
2.2E-01
2.0E-02
1.2E-03
l.OE-02
1.9E-01
2.0E-03
3.4E-02
2.2E-02
2.1E+00
5.1E-02
8.2E-02
3.1E-03
6.4E-02
2.5E-03
2. 7E-03
9.9E-02
1.6E-02
l.OE-03
7.3E-03
1.9E-01
LIE-OS
3.5E-02
4. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.8E+00
6.6E-02
l.OE-01
3.7E-03
5.2E-03
2.0E-03
3.0E-03
1.4E-01
9.6E-03
1.2E-04
5.4E-03
3.6E-03
l.OE-03
3.0E-02
4.3E-03
2.5E+00
6.3E-02
7.8E-02
3.9E-03
1.3E-02
3.0E-03
5.0E-03
1.7E-01
1.4E-02
1.9E-04
8.6E-03
4.3E-03
1.1E-03
3.7E-02
l.OE-02
2.6E+00
1.1E-01
1.5E-01
4.5E-03
1.9E-02
3.0E-03
7.3E-03
2.7E-01
1.6E-02
4.2E-04
8.7E-03
8.1E-03
1.6E-03
4.3E-02
1.1E-02
1.1E+01
2.6E-02
9.5E-03
1.4E-02
l.OE-02
9.1E-04
1.1E-02
1.2E-02
7.8E-05
9.3E-03
1.6E-03
1.4E-02
1.5E-01
2.2E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
1.9E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E-04
3.4E-04
3.2E-05
4.4E-05
1.1E-03
1.5E-04
5.5E-06
4.1E-04
9.1E-04
l.OE-04
5.7E-04
l.OE-04
Plants
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-02
2.1E-02
9.3E-04
1.8E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.9E+00
9.5E-02
1.2E-01
3.9E-03
6.5E-02
2.0E-03
3.0E-03
1. 7E-01
9.8E-03
LIE-OS
5.9E-03
1.9E-01
LIE-OS
3.1E-02
4.4E-03
2.7E+00
9.2E-02
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
7.2E-02
3.0E-03
5.0E-03
1.9E-01
1.4E-02
LIE-OS
9.0E-03
1.9E-01
1.2E-03
3. 7E-02
l.OE-02
2.8E+00
1.4E-01
1. 7E-01
4.6E-03
7.9E-02
3.0E-03
7.3E-03
3.0E-01
1.6E-02
1.4E-03
9.1E-03
1.9E-01
1. 7E-03
4.3E-02
1.1E-02
1.1E+01
2.6E-02_
9.5E-03
1.4E-02
NC
l.OE-02
9.1E-04
1.1E-02
1.2E-02
7.8E-05
9.3E-03
1.6E-03
1.4E-02
1.5E-01
2.2E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.3E+00
7.9E-02
6.2E-02
1.9E-03
2.2E-02
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
7.3E-03
3.7E-04
4.1E-03
5.6E-03
1.3E-03
2.2E-02
7.5E-03
3.0E+00
3.9E-02
2.8E-02
1.7E-03
1.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.0E-03
9.0E-02
6.6E-03
1.4E-04
5.3E-03
2.8E-03
9.1E-04
3.8E-02
3.8E-03
1.3E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E-01
1.4E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
5.4E-03
3.3E-01
5.8E-03
4.7E-04
3.8E-03
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
2.2E-02
6.8E-03
1.3E+00
3.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.6E-03
2.1E-02
1.4E-03
6.6E-03
4.4E-01
8.9E-03
7.9E-04
4.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.8E-03
2.1E-02
7.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.0E+00
2.1E-01
1. 7E-01
2.0E-03
3.5E-01
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
3. 7E-01
7. 7E-03
4.5E-03
4.6E-03
l.OE+00
1.5E-03
2.3E-02
7. 7E-03
3.7E+00
1. 7E-01
1.3E-01
1.8E-03
3.4E-01
2.5E-03
2.1E-03
2.0E-01
7.0E-03
4.3E-03
5.8E-03
l.OE+00
LIE-OS
3.9E-02
4.0E-03
2.0E+00
2.6E-01
2.2E-01
1.5E-03
3.4E-01
1.3E-03
5.5E-03
4.3E-01
6.2E-03
4.6E-03
4.3E-03
l.OE+00
1.2E-03
2.3E-02
7.0E-03
2.0E+00
4.4E-01
4.3E-01
4.8E-03
3.5E-01
1.5E-03
6. 7E-03
5.5E-01
9.3E-03
4.9E-03
4.9E-03
l.OE+00
2.9E-03
2.2E-02
7.8E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (b).xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.7E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.3E-01
1.5E-02
1.6E-03
4.3E-03
1.9E-02
2.8E-03
2.6E-02
3.4E-02
1.3E+00
l.OE-01
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
1.8E-02
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
2.9E-01
5.4E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-03
1.3E-02
l.OE-03
2.0E-02
4.1E-03
1.1E+00
6.8E-02
6.9E-02
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
2.3E-04
4.7E-03
7.5E-03
1.6E-03
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
9.1E-01
1.2E-02
3.0E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-03
l.OE-03
1.6E-03
4.0E-02
6.9E-03
3.4E-05
2.8E-03
8.5E-04
4.8E-04
1.5E-02
2.3E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.2E+00
3.2E-01
2. 7E-01
2.9E-03
3.5E-01
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
5.4E-01
1.5E-02
5. 7E-03
4.8E-03
l.OE+00
3.0E-03
2. 7E-02
3.4E-02
2.0E+00
2.4E-01
1. 7E-01
1.6E-03
3.4E-01
1.3E-03
4.8E-03
4.0E-01
5.8E-03
4.5E-03
4.2E-03
l.OE+00
LIE-OS
2.1E-02
4.3E-03
1.7E+00
2.0E-01
1. 7E-01
1. 7E-03
3.4E-01
1.4E-03
2.4E-02
3.1E-01
l.OE-02
4.4E-03
5.2E-03
l.OE+00
1. 7E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E-02
1.6E+00
1.5E-01
1.3E-01
1.5E-03
3.3E-01
1.1E-03
1. 7E-03
1.5E-01
7.3E-03
4.2E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE+00
6.2E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (b).xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.0E-01
3.9E-02
6.5E-02
2.1E-03
3.1E-03
8.8E-04
2.0E-03
l.OE-01
4.5E-03
l.OE-04
2.4E-03
2.1E-03
4.7E-04
1.3E-02
2.2E-03
9.9E-01
3.3E-02
3.5E-02
1.5E-03
5.9E-03
1.2E-03
2.2E-03
8.4E-02
5.5E-03
9.9E-05
3.4E-03
2.0E-03
4.6E-04
1.4E-02
4.9E-03
l.OE+00
5.1E-02
6.6E-02
1.8E-03
8.9E-03
1.1E-03
3.1E-03
1.2E-01
6.0E-03
2.0E-04
3.3E-03
3.4E-03
6.4E-04
1.6E-02
4.5E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
5.6E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
3.3E-01
l.OE-01
4.1E-03
l.OE+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.6E+00
1. 7E-01
1. 7E-01
2.2E-03
3.3E-01
9.3E-04
2.1E-03
2.1E-01
5.0E-03
4.2E-03
2.9E-03
l.OE+00
6.2E-04
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.7E+00
1. 7E-01
1.4E-01
1. 7E-03
3.3E-01
1.2E-03
2.3E-03
1.9E-01
5.9E-03
4.2E-03
3.9E-03
l.OE+00
6.0E-04
1.5E-02
5.2E-03
1.7E+00
1.9E-01
1. 7E-01
2.0E-03
3.3E-01
1.2E-03
3.2E-03
2.3E-01
6.4E-03
4.3E-03
3.8E-03
l.OE+00
7.9E-04
1. 7E-02
4. 7E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (b).xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.3E+00
7.9E-02
6.2E-02
1.9E-03
2.2E-02
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
7.3E-03
3.7E-04
4.1E-03
5.6E-03
1.3E-03
2.2E-02
7.5E-03
3.0E+00
3.9E-02
2.8E-02
1.7E-03
1.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.0E-03
9.0E-02
6.6E-03
1.4E-04
5.3E-03
2.8E-03
9.1E-04
3.8E-02
3.8E-03
1.3E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E-01
1.4E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
5.4E-03
3.3E-01
5.8E-03
4.7E-04
3.8E-03
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
2.2E-02
6.8E-03
1.3E+00
3.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.6E-03
2.1E-02
1.4E-03
6.6E-03
4.4E-01
8.9E-03
7.9E-04
4.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.8E-03
2.1E-02
7.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
8.4E-02
6.4E-02
2.0E-03
2.3E-02
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
7. 7E-03
3.8E-04
4.6E-03
7.0E-03
1.5E-03
2.3E-02
7. 7E-03
3.1E+00
4.4E-02
2.9E-02
1.8E-03
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
2.1E-03
9.6E-02
7.0E-03
1.5E-04
5.8E-03
4.2E-03
1.1E-03
3.9E-02
4.0E-03
1.4E+00
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
1.5E-03
1. 7E-02
1.3E-03
5.5E-03
3.3E-01
6.2E-03
4.8E-04
4.3E-03
1.3E-02
1.2E-03
2.3E-02
7.0E-03
1.4E+00
3.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.8E-03
2.1E-02
1.5E-03
6. 7E-03
4.5E-01
9.3E-03
8.0E-04
4.9E-03
2.5E-02
2.9E-03
2.2E-02
7.8E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (c).xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.7E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.3E-01
1.5E-02
1.6E-03
4.3E-03
1.9E-02
2.8E-03
2.6E-02
3.4E-02
1.3E+00
l.OE-01
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
1.8E-02
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
2.9E-01
5.4E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-03
1.3E-02
l.OE-03
2.0E-02
4.1E-03
1.1E+00
6.8E-02
6.9E-02
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
2.3E-04
4.7E-03
7.5E-03
1.6E-03
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
9.1E-01
1.2E-02
3.0E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-03
l.OE-03
1.6E-03
4.0E-02
6.9E-03
3.4E-05
2.8E-03
8.5E-04
4.8E-04
1.5E-02
2.3E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.6E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.9E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.4E-01
1.5E-02
1.6E-03
4.8E-03
2.0E-02
3.0E-03
2. 7E-02
3.4E-02
1.4E+00
1.1E-01
6.6E-02
1.6E-03
1.9E-02
1.3E-03
4.8E-03
3.0E-01
5.8E-03
3.3E-04
4.2E-03
1.5E-02
LIE-OS
2.1E-02
4.3E-03
1.2E+00
7.3E-02
7.1E-02
1. 7E-03
1.6E-02
1.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
2.4E-04
5.2E-03
8.9E-03
1. 7E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E-02
l.OE+00
1.8E-02
3.2E-02
1.5E-03
2.8E-03
1.1E-03
1. 7E-03
4.5E-02
7.3E-03
4.4E-05
3.4E-03
2.3E-03
6.2E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (c).xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.0E-01
3.9E-02
6.5E-02
2.1E-03
3.1E-03
8.8E-04
2.0E-03
l.OE-01
4.5E-03
l.OE-04
2.4E-03
2.1E-03
4.7E-04
1.3E-02
2.2E-03
9.9E-01
3.3E-02
3.5E-02
1.5E-03
5.9E-03
1.2E-03
2.2E-03
8.4E-02
5.5E-03
9.9E-05
3.4E-03
2.0E-03
4.6E-04
1.4E-02
4.9E-03
l.OE+00
5.1E-02
6.6E-02
1.8E-03
8.9E-03
1.1E-03
3.1E-03
1.2E-01
6.0E-03
2.0E-04
3.3E-03
3.4E-03
6.4E-04
1.6E-02
4.5E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+00
4.4E-02
6. 7E-02
2.2E-03
3.8E-03
9.3E-04
2.1E-03
1.1E-01
5.0E-03
1.1E-04
2.9E-03
3.6E-03
6.2E-04
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.1E+00
3.9E-02
3.6E-02
1. 7E-03
6.6E-03
1.2E-03
2.3E-03
9.0E-02
5.9E-03
1.1E-04
3.9E-03
3.4E-03
6.0E-04
1.5E-02
5.2E-03
1.1E+00
5. 7E-02
6.8E-02
2.0E-03
9.6E-03
1.2E-03
3.2E-03
1.3E-01
6.4E-03
2.1E-04
3.8E-03
4.9E-03
7.9E-04
1. 7E-02
4. 7E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (c).xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-4
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.1E+00
2.4E-01
1.5E-01
3.4E-01
1.9E-01
5.9E-01
1.9E+01
6.4E-02
4.4E-02
4.5E-02
8.4E-02
5.8E-02
2.7E-01
5.9E+00
1.3E-01
1.5E-01
2.9E-01
2.9E-01
3.1E-01
9.1E+00
6.8E-02
2.5E-02
5.7E-02
3.4E-02
9.3E-02
1.6E-01
3.7E+00
5.1E-01
1.3E-01
3.5E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-01
3.0E+01
5.8E-02
7.7E-02
4.7E-02
1.7E-01
6.9E-02
3.1E-01
3.7E+00
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
3.7E-01
2.2E-01
8.8E-01
3.3E+01
8.2E-02
9.4E-02
5.3E-02
1.9E-01
6.4E-02
3.2E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.4E+00
NC
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
l.OE+00
1.9E-01
5.9E-01
2.1E+01
6.4E-02
4.4E-02
4.5E-02
2.2E+00
NC
5.8E-02
2. 7E-01
6.1E+00
NC
2.0E-01
1.5E-01
9.6E-01
2.9E-01
3.1E-01
1.1E+01
6.8E-02
2.5E-02
5. 7E-02
2.2E+00
NC
9.3E-02
1.6E-01
4.0E+00
NC
5.8E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE+00
2.0E-01
8.0E-01
3.2E+01
5.8E-02_
7. 7E-02
4. 7E-02
2.3E+00
NC
6.9E-02
3.1E-01
3.9E+00
NC
1.1E+00
3.3E-01
l.OE+00
2.2E-01
8.8E-01
3.5E+01
8.2E-02
9.4E-02
5.3E-02
2.3E+00
NC
6.5E-02
3.2E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-4
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.4E+00
6.5E-01
2.3E-01
4.6E-01
2.5E-01
1.3E+00
3.3E+01
1.1E-01
1.7E-01
5.1E-02
2.0E-01
8.0E-02
6.9E-01
2.9E+00
2.2E-01
1.1E-01
2.4E-01
1.6E-01
4.8E-01
1.8E+01
5.0E-02
3.8E-02
4.0E-02
l.OE-01
5.2E-02
1.6E-01
2.5E+00
2.3E-01
1.3E-01
2.1E-01
1.8E-01
1.4E+00
1.2E+01
8.0E-02
2.8E-02
4.7E-02
9.4E-02
4.1E-02
5.2E-01
2.3E+00
1.4E-01
1.1E-01
4.8E-02
1.5E-01
2.1E-01
4.6E+00
6.2E-02
5.9E-03
3.3E-02
1.9E-02
4.1E-02
1.1E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.6E+00
NC
7.2E-01
2.3E-01
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
1.3E+00
3.5E+01
1.1E-01
1. 7E-01
5.1E-02
2.4E+00
NC
8.0E-02
6.9E-01
3.2E+00
NC
2.9E-01
1.1E-01
9.1E-01
1.6E-01
4.8E-01
2.0E+01
5.0E-02
3.8E-02
4.0E-02
2.3E+00
NC
5.2E-02
1.6E-01
2.7E+00
NC
3.0E-01
1.3E-01
8. 7E-01
1.8E-01
1.4E+00
1.4E+01
8.0E-02
2.8E-02
4. 7E-02
2.2E+00
NC
4.1E-02
5.2E-01
2.5E+00
NC
2.1E-01
1.1E-01
7.1E-01
1.5E-01
2.1E-01
6.4E+00
6.2E-02
6.0E-03
3.4E-02
2.2E+00
NC
4.1E-02
1.1E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-4
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.1E+00
2.4E-01
1.4E-01
5.7E-02
1.2E-01
2.3E-01
8.7E+00
3.8E-02
1.2E-02
2.6E-02
4.0E-02
3.7E-02
l.OE-01
2.9E+00
1.8E-01
1.4E-01
1.4E-01
1.8E-01
3.9E-01
l.OE+01
5.5E-02
1.9E-02
4.2E-02
4.7E-02
4.5E-02
2.5E-01
3.0E+00
3.5E-01
1.6E-01
2.1E-01
1.8E-01
5.7E-01
1.7E+01
6.3E-02
4.2E-02
4.2E-02
9.0E-02
5.2E-02
2.6E-01
1.3E+01
2.2E-02
5.1E-01
6.2E-01
7.1E-02
6.5E-01
4.6E-02
7.8E-03
4.5E-02
1.8E-02
1.9E-01
5.3E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
2.6E-03
3.0E-04
5.1E-04
4.3E-04
2.3E-04
3.9E-04
7.4E-03
6.7E-05
6.3E-05
2.3E-04
1.2E-03
8.0E-05
2.8E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.8E-02
6.6E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.3E+00
NC
3.1E-01
1.4E-01
7.2E-01
1.2E-01
2.3E-01
l.OE+01
3.8E-02
1.2E-02
2. 7E-02
2.2E+00
NC
3. 7E-02
l.OE-01
3.2E+00
NC
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
8.0E-01
1.8E-01
3.9E-01
1.2E+01
5.6E-02
1.9E-02
4.2E-02
2.2E+00
NC
4.5E-02
2.5E-01
3.3E+00
NC
4.2E-01
1.6E-01
8. 7E-01
1.8E-01
5. 7E-01
1.8E+01
6.3E-02
4.2E-02
4.2E-02
2.2E+00
NC
5.2E-02
2.6E-01
1.3E+01
NC
2.2E-02
5.1E-01
NC
6.2E-01
7.1E-02
6.5E-01
4.6E-02
7.8E-03
4.5E-02
1.8E-02
NC
1.9E-01
5.3E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-5
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
l.OE+00
7.8E-02
4.9E-02
1.1E-01
6.3E-02
1.9E-01
6.2E+00
2.1E-02
1.4E-02
1.4E-02
2.7E-02
1.9E-02
8.7E-02
1.9E+00
4.2E-02
4.7E-02
9.5E-02
9.3E-02
9.9E-02
2.9E+00
2.2E-02
8.1E-03
1.8E-02
1.1E-02
3.0E-02
5.1E-02
1.2E+00
1.6E-01
4.2E-02
1.1E-01
6.3E-02
2.6E-01
9.8E+00
1.9E-02
2.5E-02
1.5E-02
5.6E-02
2.2E-02
9.9E-02
1.2E+00
3.2E-01
1.1E-01
1.2E-01
7.1E-02
2.8E-01
1.1E+01
2.6E-02
3.0E-02
1.7E-02
6.2E-02
2.1E-02
l.OE-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
Plants
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+00
NC
1.1E-01
4.9E-02
5.3E-01
6.3E-02
1.9E-01
7.1E+00
2.1E-02
1.6E-01
1.5E-02
1.3E+00
NC
1.9E-02
8. 7E-02
2.0E+00
NC
7.4E-02
4.8E-02
5.1E-01
9.3E-02
l.OE-01
3.8E+00
2.2E-02
1.6E-01
1.8E-02
1.3E+00
NC
3.0E-02
5.1E-02
1.3E+00
NC
2.0E-01
4.3E-02
5.3E-01
6.4E-02
2.6E-01
1.1E+01
1.9E-02
1. 7E-01
1.5E-02
1.4E+00
NC
2.2E-02
l.OE-01
1.3E+00
NC
3.5E-01
1.1E-01
5.4E-01
7.1E-02
2.9E-01
1.1E+01
2.6E-02
1.8E-01
1. 7E-02
1.4E+00
NC
2.1E-02
l.OE-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-5
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.4E+00
2.1E-01
7.3E-02
1.5E-01
8.2E-02
4.3E-01
1.1E+01
3.6E-02
5.3E-02
1.6E-02
6.6E-02
2.6E-02
2.2E-01
9.4E-01
7.1E-02
3.5E-02
7.9E-02
5.2E-02
1.6E-01
6.0E+00
1.6E-02
1.2E-02
1.3E-02
3.2E-02
1.7E-02
5.2E-02
8.1E-01
7.4E-02
4.1E-02
6.8E-02
5.9E-02
4.4E-01
3.9E+00
2.6E-02
9.1E-03
1.5E-02
3.0E-02
1.3E-02
1.7E-01
7.3E-01
4.5E-02
3.5E-02
1.5E-02
4.8E-02
6.7E-02
1.5E+00
2.0E-02
1.9E-03
1.1E-02
6.2E-03
1.3E-02
3.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
Plants
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
NC
2.4E-01
7.4E-02
5. 7E-01
8.2E-02
4.3E-01
1.1E+01
3.6E-02
2.0E-01
1.6E-02
1.4E+00
NC
2.6E-02
2.2E-01
l.OE+00
NC
l.OE-01
3.5E-02
5.0E-01
5.2E-02
1.6E-01
6.8E+00
1.6E-02
1.6E-01
1.3E-02
1.3E+00
NC
1. 7E-02
5.3E-02
9.0E-01
NC
1.1E-01
4.1E-02
4.8E-01
5.9E-02
4.4E-01
4.7E+00
2.6E-02_
1.6E-01
1.5E-02
1.3E+00
NC
1.3E-02
1. 7E-01
8.3E-01
NC
7. 7E-02
3.5E-02
4.3E-01
4.8E-02
6.8E-02
2.3E+00
2.0E-02
1.5E-01
1.1E-02
1.3E+00
NC
1.3E-02
3.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-5
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.6E-01
7.7E-02
4.4E-02
1.8E-02
3.9E-02
7.5E-02
2.8E+00
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
8.5E-03
1.3E-02
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
9.4E-01
5.8E-02
4.7E-02
4.4E-02
6.0E-02
1.3E-01
3.3E+00
1.8E-02
6.2E-03
1.3E-02
1.5E-02
1.5E-02
8.0E-02
9.8E-01
1.1E-01
5.3E-02
6.7E-02
5.9E-02
1.8E-01
5.3E+00
2.0E-02
1.4E-02
1.4E-02
2.9E-02
1.7E-02
8.3E-02
4.1E+00
7.1E-03
1.6E-01
2.0E-01
2.3E-02
2.1E-01
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.5E-02
5.7E-03
6.0E-02
1.7E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-04
3.0E-04
2.5E-04
1.3E-04
2.3E-04
4.3E-03
3.9E-05
3.7E-05
1.3E-04
6.8E-04
4.7E-05
1.6E-04
Plants
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
9.4E-02
3.2E-02
4.2E-01
8.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.3E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.6E-01
NC
1.1E-01
4.5E-02
4.4E-01
3.9E-02
7.5E-02
3.6E+00
1.2E-02
1.5E-01
8. 7E-03
1.3E+00
NC
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
l.OE+00
NC
9.0E-02
4. 7E-02
4.6E-01
6.0E-02
1.3E-01
4.1E+00
1.8E-02
1.5E-01
1.4E-02
1.3E+00
NC
1.5E-02
8.0E-02
1.1E+00
NC
1.5E-01
5.3E-02
4.8E-01
5.9E-02
1.8E-01
6.1E+00
2.0E-02
1.6E-01
1.4E-02
1.3E+00
NC
1. 7E-02
8.3E-02
4.1E+00
NC
7.1E-03
1.6E-01
NC
2.0E-01
2.3E-02
2.1E-01
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.5E-02
5. 7E-03
NC
6.0E-02
1. 7E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-6
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.5E+00
2.6E-01
2.5E-01
l.OE-02
7.5E-02
7.7E-03
1.8E-02
7.8E-01
3.9E-02
LIE-OS
2.2E-02
1.8E-02
4.4E-03
1.2E-01
2.7E-02
1.2E+01
1.6E-01
1.3E-01
9.7E-03
6.5E-02
1.1E-02
9.6E-03
3.7E-01
4.1E-02
6.1E-04
2.8E-02
7.4E-03
3.8E-03
1.8E-01
1.6E-02
7.8E+00
5.1E-01
5.3E-01
8.6E-03
7.7E-02
7.8E-03
2.5E-02
1.2E+00
3.5E-02
1.9E-03
2.4E-02
3.8E-02
4.6E-03
1.4E-01
3.1E-02
7.8E+00
5.3E-01
l.OE+00
2.2E-02
8.2E-02
8.7E-03
2.7E-02
1.3E+00
5.0E-02
2.3E-03
2.7E-02
4.2E-02
6.8E-03
1.3E-01
3.2E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+01
6.6E-01
7.5E-01
l.OE-02
1.1E+00
7. 7E-03
1.8E-02
1.3E+00
4.0E-02
1.1E-03
2.3E-02
3.3E+00
4.6E-03
1.2E-01
2. 7E-02
1.6E+01
5.6E-01
6.3E-01
9.9E-03
1.1E+00
1.1E-02
9.6E-03
8.6E-01
4.2E-02
6.2E-04
2.9E-02
3.3E+00
3.9E-03
1.9E-01
1.6E-02
1.1E+01
9.2E-01
l.OE+00
8.9E-03
1.1E+00
7.8E-03
2.5E-02
1.7E+00
3.5E-02
1.9E-03
2.4E-02
3.3E+00
4.8E-03
1.4E-01
3.1E-02
1.1E+01
9.4E-01
1.5E+00
2.2E-02
1.1E+00
8. 7E-03
2. 7E-02
1.8E+00
5.0E-02
2.3E-03
2. 7E-02
3.3E+00
7.0E-03
1.3E-01
3.3E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-6
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.2E+00
5.9E-01
6.8E-01
1.5E-02
l.OE-01
l.OE-02
4.1E-02
1.3E+00
6.8E-02
4.0E-03
2.5E-02
4.5E-02
8.6E-03
1.6E-01
7.0E-02
6.1E+00
2.7E-01
2.3E-01
7.1E-03
5.4E-02
6.4E-03
1.5E-02
7.4E-01
3.1E-02
9.2E-04
2.0E-02
2.2E-02
2.8E-03
l.OE-01
1.6E-02
5.2E+00
2.3E-01
2.4E-01
8.4E-03
4.6E-02
7.2E-03
4.3E-02
4.9E-01
4.9E-02
6.8E-04
2.3E-02
2.1E-02
4.6E-03
8.1E-02
5.2E-02
4.7E+00
5.2E-02
1.4E-01
7.1E-03
1.1E-02
5.9E-03
6.5E-03
1.9E-01
3.8E-02
1.4E-04
1.7E-02
4.2E-03
2.5E-03
8.2E-02
1.1E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.3E+01
l.OE+00
1.2E+00
1.5E-02
1.1E+00
l.OE-02
4.1E-02
1.8E+00
6.9E-02
4.0E-03
2.6E-02
3.3E+00
8.8E-03
1.6E-01
7.0E-02
9.5E+00
6.8E-01
7.3E-01
7.3E-03
1.1E+00
6.4E-03
1.5E-02
1.2E+00
3.1E-02
9.3E-04
2.1E-02
3.3E+00
2.9E-03
l.OE-01
1. 7E-02
8.7E+00
6.4E-01
7.4E-01
8.6E-03
1.1E+00
7.3E-03
4.3E-02
9.8E-01
4.9E-02
6.9E-04
2.4E-02
3.3E+00
4.8E-03
8.2E-02
5.2E-02
8.2E+00
4.6E-01
6.4E-01
7.3E-03
l.OE+00
5.9E-03
6.6E-03
6.8E-01
3.8E-02
1.5E-04
1. 7E-02
3.3E+00
2. 7E-03
8.3E-02
1.1E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-6
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.3E+00
1.6E-01
2.5E-01
9.1E-03
1.3E-02
4.8E-03
7.2E-03
3.5E-01
2.3E-02
2.8E-04
1.3E-02
8.8E-03
2.5E-03
7.4E-02
1.1E-02
6.1E+00
1.5E-01
1.9E-01
9.5E-03
3.0E-02
7.3E-03
1.2E-02
4.1E-01
3.4E-02
4.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-02
2.7E-03
8.9E-02
2.5E-02
6.3E+00
2.6E-01
3.7E-01
1.1E-02
4.6E-02
7.2E-03
1.8E-02
6.7E-01
3.8E-02
l.OE-03
2.1E-02
2.0E-02
3.9E-03
l.OE-01
2.6E-02
2.6E+01
6.4E-02
2.3E-02
3.3E-02
2.4E-02
2.2E-03
2.6E-02
2.8E-02
1.9E-04
2.2E-02
3.9E-03
3.5E-02
3.7E-01
5.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
3.4E-02
6.5E-03
1.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.9E-04
5.6E-05
7.6E-05
1.9E-03
2.5E-04
9.5E-06
7.0E-04
1.6E-03
1.7E-04
9.9E-04
1.7E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
3.4E+00
4.0E-01
5.0E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E-01
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.7E+00
5. 7E-01
7.5E-01
9.3E-03
l.OE+00
4.9E-03
7.3E-03
8.4E-01
2.4E-02
2.9E-04
1.4E-02
3.3E+00
2. 7E-03
7.5E-02
1.1E-02
9.5E+00
5.6E-01
6.9E-01
9. 7E-03
1.1E+00
7.4E-03
1.2E-02
9.0E-01
3.4E-02
4. 7E-04
2.2E-02
3.3E+00
2.9E-03
9.0E-02
2.5E-02
9.8E+00
6. 7E-01
8. 7E-01
1.1E-02
1.1E+00
7.3E-03
1.8E-02
1.2E+00
3.8E-02
l.OE-03
2.2E-02
3.3E+00
4.1E-03
l.OE-01
2.6E-02
2.6E+01
6.4E-02
2.3E-02
3.3E-02
NC
2.4E-02
2.2E-03
2.6E-02
2.8E-02
1.9E-04
2.2E-02
3.9E-03
3.5E-02
3. 7E-01
5.4E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-7
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mallard |
Work Area
WAS
WA7
All Work Areas
Utah Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
1.1E+00
1.5E-01
3.6E-02
8.6E-02
5.8E-02
2.4E-01
8.6E+00
1.5E-02
2.4E-02
1.4E-02
5.3E-02
1.8E-02
8.2E-02
3.6E-01
1.3E-02
1.5E-02
1.5E-02
2.9E-02
8.5E-02
9.1E-01
8.3E-03
1.6E-03
6.2E-03
1.5E-02
6.5E-03
3.2E-02
5.8E-01
4.5E-02
2.1E-02
3.1E-02
3.7E-02
1.2E-01
2.7E+00
l.OE-02
6.6E-03
8.0E-03
2.5E-02
9.7E-03
4.3E-02
3.0E+00
5.3E-03
1.2E-01
1.5E-01
1.7E-02
1.6E-01
1.1E-02
1.9E-03
1.1E-02
4.2E-03
4.5E-02
1.3E-02
Surface
Water
7.1E-04
8.2E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.2E-05
1.1E-04
2.0E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.2E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.1E-04
8.2E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.2E-05
1.1E-04
2.0E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.2E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
7.1E-04
8.2E-05
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
6.2E-05
1.1E-04
2.0E-03
1.8E-05
1.7E-05
6.2E-05
3.2E-04
2.2E-05
7.7E-05
Plants
Surface/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+00
NC
1.5E-01
3. 7E-02
8. 7E-02
5.8E-02
2.4E-01
8.6E+00
1.5E-02
2.4E-02
1.4E-02
5.4E-02
NC
1.8E-02
8.2E-02
3.6E-01
NC
1.3E-02
1.5E-02
1.5E-02
2.9E-02
8.5E-02
9.1E-01
8.4E-03
1.6E-03
6.2E-03
1.5E-02
NC
6.5E-03
3.2E-02
5.8E-01
NC
4.5E-02
2.1E-02
3.1E-02
3. 7E-02
1.2E-01
2.7E+00
l.OE-02
6.6E-03
8.1E-03
2.6E-02
NC
9.8E-03
4.3E-02
3.0E+00
NC
5.3E-03
1.2E-01
NC
1.5E-01
1. 7E-02
1.6E-01
1.1E-02
1.9E-03
1.1E-02
4.2E-03
NC
4.5E-02
1.3E-02
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-8
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.9E+00
1.5E-01
9.3E-02
2.1E-01
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.2E+01
3.9E-02
2.7E-02
2.7E-02
5.1E-02
3.5E-02
1.6E-01
3.6E+00
7.9E-02
9.0E-02
1.8E-01
1.8E-01
1.9E-01
5.5E+00
4.1E-02
1.5E-02
3.5E-02
2.1E-02
5.7E-02
9.7E-02
2.3E+00
3.1E-01
8.0E-02
2.1E-01
1.2E-01
4.9E-01
1.9E+01
3.5E-02
4.7E-02
2.9E-02
1.1E-01
4.2E-02
1.9E-01
2.3E+00
6.0E-01
2.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.3E-01
5.4E-01
2.0E+01
5.0E-02
5.7E-02
3.2E-02
1.2E-01
3.9E-02
2.0E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.2E+00
NC
2.2E-01
9.3E-02
9.1E-01
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+01
3.9E-02
2. 7E-02
2.8E-02
2.3E+00
NC
3.5E-02
1.6E-01
3.8E+00
NC
1.5E-01
9.0E-02
8.9E-01
1.8E-01
1.9E-01
7.4E+00
4.1E-02
1.5E-02
3.5E-02
2.3E+00
NC
5. 7E-02
9. 7E-02
2.5E+00
NC
3.8E-01
8.0E-02
9.2E-01
1.2E-01
4.9E-01
2.0E+01
3.5E-02
4. 7E-02
2.9E-02
2.4E+00
NC
4.2E-02
1.9E-01
2.5E+00
NC
6. 7E-01
2.0E-01
9.3E-01
1.3E-01
5.4E-01
2.2E+01
5.0E-02
5. 7E-02
3.3E-02
2.4E+00
NC
3.9E-02
2.0E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-8
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.7E+00
4.0E-01
1.4E-01
2.8E-01
1.5E-01
8.1E-01
2.0E+01
6.8E-02
l.OE-01
3.1E-02
1.2E-01
4.9E-02
4.2E-01
1.8E+00
1.4E-01
6.5E-02
1.5E-01
9.8E-02
2.9E-01
1.1E+01
3.1E-02
2.3E-02
2.4E-02
6.1E-02
3.2E-02
9.9E-02
1.5E+00
1.4E-01
7.7E-02
1.3E-01
1.1E-01
8.4E-01
7.4E+00
4.9E-02
1.7E-02
2.8E-02
5.8E-02
2.5E-02
3.2E-01
1.4E+00
8.4E-02
6.6E-02
2.9E-02
9.1E-02
1.3E-01
2.8E+00
3.8E-02
3.6E-03
2.0E-02
1.2E-02
2.5E-02
6.7E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.9E+00
NC
4. 7E-01
1.4E-01
9.9E-01
1.5E-01
8.1E-01
2.2E+01
6.8E-02
l.OE-01
3.1E-02
2.4E+00
NC
4.9E-02
4.2E-01
2.0E+00
NC
2.1E-01
6.6E-02
8.6E-01
9.9E-02
2.9E-01
1.3E+01
3.1E-02
2.3E-02
2.4E-02
2.4E+00
NC
3.2E-02
9.9E-02
1.8E+00
NC
2.1E-01
7.8E-02
8.3E-01
1.1E-01
8.4E-01
9.2E+00
4.9E-02
1. 7E-02
2.9E-02
2.4E+00
NC
2.5E-02
3.2E-01
1.6E+00
NC
1.6E-01
6.6E-02
7.4E-01
9.1E-02
1.3E-01
4.7E+00
3.8E-02
3.6E-03
2.0E-02
2.3E+00
NC
2.5E-02
6. 7E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-8
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.3E+00
1.4E-01
8.4E-02
3.5E-02
7.4E-02
1.4E-01
5.3E+00
2.3E-02
7.1E-03
1.6E-02
2.5E-02
2.3E-02
6.4E-02
1.8E+00
1.1E-01
8.8E-02
8.4E-02
1.1E-01
2.4E-01
6.1E+00
3.4E-02
1.2E-02
2.5E-02
2.9E-02
2.7E-02
1.5E-01
1.9E+00
2.2E-01
l.OE-01
1.3E-01
1.1E-01
3.5E-01
l.OE+01
3.8E-02
2.6E-02
2.6E-02
5.5E-02
3.2E-02
1.6E-01
7.7E+00
1.3E-02
3.1E-01
3.8E-01
4.4E-02
4.0E-01
2.8E-02
4.7E-03
2.7E-02
1.1E-02
1.1E-01
3.3E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-04
2.8E-04
2.4E-04
1.3E-04
2.2E-04
4.1E-03
3.7E-05
3.5E-05
1.3E-04
6.4E-04
4.4E-05
1.5E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
2.5E-01
7.3E-02
7.1E-01
1.8E+00
2.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
NC
2.2E-01
8.4E-02
7.4E-01
7.4E-02
1.4E-01
7.2E+00
2.3E-02
7.2E-03
1.6E-02
2.3E+00
NC
2.3E-02
6.4E-02
2.0E+00
NC
1.8E-01
8.8E-02
7.9E-01
1.1E-01
2.4E-01
8.0E+00
3.4E-02
1.2E-02
2.6E-02
2.3E+00
NC
2. 7E-02
1.5E-01
2.1E+00
NC
2.9E-01
l.OE-01
8.3E-01
1.1E-01
3.5E-01
1.2E+01
3.8E-02
2.6E-02
2.6E-02
2.4E+00
NC
3.2E-02
1.6E-01
7.7E+00
NC
1.3E-02
3.1E-01
NC
3.8E-01
4.4E-02
4.0E-01
2.8E-02
4. 7E-03
2. 7E-02
1.1E-02
NC
1.1E-01
3.3E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-9
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.7E+00
2.7E-01
1.6E-01
4.5E-01
2.1E-01
8.3E-01
2.6E+01
6.8E-02
6.1E-02
4.5E-02
l.OE-01
6.5E-02
3.3E-01
6.9E+00
1.4E-01
1.4E-01
3.9E-01
3.1E-01
3.4E-01
1.2E+01
5.9E-02
3.1E-02
5.6E-02
5.6E-02
9.7E-02
2.0E-01
4.0E+00
8.8E-01
1.4E-01
5.6E-01
2.1E-01
1.4E+00
5.0E+01
6.6E-02
1.4E-01
5.0E-02
3.4E-01
7.0E-02
5.7E-01
4.7E+00
1.3E+00
4.5E-01
6.7E-01
2.5E-01
1.2E+00
5.9E+01
1.1E-01
1.2E-01
6.2E-02
3.8E-01
7.3E-02
5.4E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
Plants
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.5E+00
NC
6.0E-01
1.6E-01
3.9E+00
2.1E-01
8.3E-01
3.3E+01
6.8E-02
7.4E-01
4.6E-02
1.5E+01
NC
6.5E-02
3.3E-01
7.7E+00
NC
4.6E-01
1.4E-01
3.8E+00
3.1E-01
3.4E-01
1.9E+01
6.0E-02
7.1E-01
5.6E-02
1.5E+01
NC
9. 7E-02
2.0E-01
4.8E+00
NC
1.2E+00
1.4E-01
4.0E+00
2.1E-01
1.4E+00
5.7E+01
6.6E-02
8.2E-01
5.0E-02
1.5E+01
NC
7.0E-02
5. 7E-01
5.5E+00
NC
1.6E+00
4.5E-01
4.1E+00
2.6E-01
1.2E+00
6.7E+01
1.1E-01
8.0E-01
6.3E-02
1.5E+01
NC
7.3E-02
5.4E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-9
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
2.5E-01
8.5E-01
2.4E-01
2.3E+00
5.3E+01
1.5E-01
2.6E-01
5.3E-02
3.8E-01
7.7E-02
l.OE+00
3.1E+00
3.9E-01
1.3E-01
4.8E-01
1.7E-01
7.2E-01
3.9E+01
5.4E-02
6.9E-02
4.1E-02
2.6E-01
5.6E-02
3.0E-01
3.4E+00
3.6E-01
1.6E-01
3.5E-01
2.3E-01
3.2E+00
2.0E+01
1.1E-01
4.5E-02
6.4E-02
1.7E-01
5.2E-02
8.6E-01
4.1E+00
2.3E-01
1.7E-01
9.0E-02
2.1E-01
1.8E-01
9.9E+00
8.4E-02
8.5E-03
4.2E-02
2.3E-02
6.6E-02
2.6E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
Plants
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.9E+00
NC
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
4.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.3E+00
6.0E+01
1.5E-01
9.4E-01
5.3E-02
1.5E+01
NC
7. 7E-02
l.OE+00
3.9E+00
NC
7.1E-01
1.3E-01
3.9E+00
1. 7E-01
7.3E-01
4.7E+01
5.4E-02
7.5E-01
4.1E-02
1.5E+01
NC
5.6E-02
3.0E-01
4.2E+00
NC
6.8E-01
1.6E-01
3.8E+00
2.3E-01
3.2E+00
2.7E+01
1.1E-01
7.2E-01
6.4E-02
1.5E+01
NC
5.2E-02
8.6E-01
4.9E+00
NC
5.5E-01
1. 7E-01
3.5E+00
2.1E-01
1.8E-01
1.7E+01
8.4E-02
6.9E-01
4.3E-02
1.5E+01
NC
6.6E-02
2.6E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-9
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.1E+00
3.8E-01
2.1E-01
l.OE-01
1.7E-01
4.1E-01
1.8E+01
5.4E-02
2.1E-02
3.6E-02
7.3E-02
5.4E-02
1.6E-01
3.5E+00
3.2E-01
1.7E-01
2.0E-01
2.2E-01
5.9E-01
1.6E+01
6.6E-02
3.0E-02
5.1E-02
8.0E-02
5.3E-02
3.7E-01
4.0E+00
6.8E-01
1.9E-01
3.8E-01
2.2E-01
9.4E-01
2.8E+01
7.8E-02
6.3E-02
5.3E-02
1.8E-01
6.7E-02
4.4E-01
1.6E+01
3.4E-02
8.5E-01
7.8E-01
1.1E-01
5.8E-01
7.1E-02
3.5E-03
5.7E-02
2.1E-02
2.6E-01
4.0E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
3.1E-03
4.0E-04
4.6E-04
3.9E-04
2.5E-04
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
l.OE-04
1.5E-04
2.6E-04
1.3E-03
6.4E-05
3.2E-04
Plants
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
2.3E+00
4.2E+00
6.8E-01
l.OE+01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
2.2E-01
7.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.5E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.9E+00
NC
7.1E-01
2.1E-01
3.5E+00
1. 7E-01
4.1E-01
2.6E+01
5.4E-02
7.0E-01
3. 7E-02
1.5E+01
NC
5.4E-02
1.6E-01
4.3E+00
NC
6.4E-01
1. 7E-01
3.6E+00
2.2E-01
6.0E-01
2.4E+01
6.6E-02
7.1E-01
5.1E-02
1.5E+01
NC
5.3E-02
3. 7E-01
4.8E+00
NC
l.OE+00
1.9E-01
3.8E+00
2.2E-01
9.4E-01
3.5E+01
7.8E-02
7.4E-01
5.3E-02
1.5E+01
NC
6. 7E-02
4.4E-01
1.6E+01
NC
3.4E-02
8.5E-01
NC
7.8E-01
1.1E-01
5.8E-01
7.1E-02
3.5E-03
5. 7E-02
2.1E-02
NC
2.6E-01
4.0E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-10
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.1E+02
6.4E+00
3.9E+00
1.5E-01
1.4E+00
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+01
5.8E-01
2.1E-02
3.2E-01
3.1E-01
1.1E-01
1.8E+00
4.6E-01
2.0E+02
2.8E+00
2.0E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E+00
1.7E-01
1.5E-01
6.6E+00
5.1E-01
l.OE-02
3.9E-01
1.7E-01
6.9E-02
2.7E+00
2.8E-01
1.2E+02
1.1E+01
1.3E+01
1.3E-01
1.7E+00
1.2E-01
5.9E-01
2.8E+01
5.6E-01
4.7E-02
3.5E-01
l.OE+00
1.3E-01
1.9E+00
7.9E-01
1.4E+02
1.4E+01
1.9E+01
4.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.4E-01
5.2E-01
3.3E+01
9.5E-01
4.1E-02
4.3E-01
1.1E+00
1.9E-01
2.0E+00
7.5E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.2E+02
8.2E+00
6.1E+00
1.5E-01
4.9E+00
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.6E+01
5.8E-01
2.1E-02
3.2E-01
1.6E+01
1.1E-01
1.8E+00
4.6E-01
2.1E+02
4.7E+00
4.2E+00
1.3E-01
4.7E+00
1. 7E-01
1.5E-01
8.5E+00
5.1E-01
l.OE-02
3.9E-01
1.5E+01
7.0E-02
2.7E+00
2.8E-01
1.3E+02
1.2E+01
1.5E+01
1.3E-01
5.2E+00
1.2E-01
5.9E-01
3.0E+01
5.6E-01
4. 7E-02
3.5E-01
1.6E+01
1.3E-01
1.9E+00
7.9E-01
1.5E+02
1.6E+01
2.1E+01
4.1E-01
5.6E+00
1.4E-01
5.2E-01
3.5E+01
9.5E-01
4.1E-02
4.3E-01
1.6E+01
1.9E-01
2.0E+00
7.5E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-10
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.2E+02
1.2E+01
1.2E+01
2.3E-01
2.6E+00
1.3E-01
l.OE+00
2.9E+01
1.3E+00
8.9E-02
3.7E-01
1.2E+00
2.0E-01
2.1E+00
1.4E+00
9.0E+01
7.6E+00
5.6E+00
1.1E-01
1.5E+00
9.2E-02
3.1E-01
2.2E+01
4.5E-01
2.3E-02
2.8E-01
7.9E-01
7.7E-02
1.5E+00
4.2E-01
9.9E+01
4.8E+00
5.2E+00
1.5E-01
1.1E+00
1.3E-01
1.4E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E-01
1.5E-02
4.4E-01
5.1E-01
9.8E-02
1.4E+00
1.2E+00
1.2E+02
1.7E+00
3.3E+00
1.5E-01
2.8E-01
1.2E-01
7.9E-02
5.5E+00
7.1E-01
2.9E-03
2.9E-01
7.1E-02
5.0E-02
1.8E+00
3.6E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.3E+02
1.4E+01
1.4E+01
2.3E-01
6.1E+00
1.3E-01
l.OE+00
3.1E+01
1.3E+00
8.9E-02
3. 7E-01
1.6E+01
2.0E-01
2.1E+00
1.4E+00
l.OE+02
9.4E+00
7.8E+00
1.2E-01
5.0E+00
9.2E-02
3.1E-01
2.4E+01
4.6E-01
2.3E-02
2.9E-01
1.6E+01
7.8E-02
1.6E+00
4.2E-01
1.1E+02
6.7E+00
7.4E+00
1.5E-01
4.6E+00
1.3E-01
1.4E+00
1.3E+01
9.1E-01
1.5E-02
4.5E-01
1.6E+01
9.8E-02
1.4E+00
1.2E+00
1.3E+02
3.5E+00
5.5E+00
1.5E-01
3.8E+00
1.2E-01
7.9E-02
7.4E+00
7.2E-01
2.9E-03
2.9E-01
1.5E+01
5.0E-02
1.8E+00
3.6E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-10
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.0E+01
4.0E+00
5.5E+00
1.9E-01
3.2E-01
9.2E-02
1.8E-01
l.OE+01
4.6E-01
6.9E-03
2.5E-01
2.2E-01
5.9E-02
1.5E+00
2.2E-01
l.OE+02
3.5E+00
4.6E+00
1.6E-01
6.1E-01
1.2E-01
2.6E-01
9.0E+00
5.6E-01
l.OE-02
3.6E-01
2.4E-01
6.3E-02
1.5E+00
5.2E-01
1.2E+02
6.6E+00
9.9E+00
1.7E-01
1.2E+00
1.2E-01
4.1E-01
1.6E+01
6.6E-01
2.1E-02
3.7E-01
5.6E-01
l.OE-01
1.9E+00
6.1E-01
4.6E+02
8.7E-01
4.9E-01
7.8E-01
4.3E-01
4.9E-02
3.3E-01
6.1E-01
1.2E-03
4.0E-01
6.3E-02
5.8E-01
7.3E+00
5.5E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
7.0E-02
1.3E-02
4.4E-03
3.3E-04
9.2E-04
1.1E-04
2.5E-04
6.8E-03
6.6E-04
3.8E-05
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
3.5E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
2.2E+00
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+02
5.8E+00
7.7E+00
1.9E-01
3.8E+00
9.2E-02
1.8E-01
1.2E+01
4.6E-01
7.0E-03
2.5E-01
1.6E+01
5.9E-02
1.5E+00
2.2E-01
1.2E+02
5.3E+00
6.8E+00
1.6E-01
4.1E+00
1.2E-01
2.6E-01
1.1E+01
5.6E-01
l.OE-02
3.6E-01
1.6E+01
6.3E-02
1.5E+00
5.2E-01
1.3E+02
8.5E+00
1.2E+01
1. 7E-01
4.6E+00
1.2E-01
4.1E-01
1.7E+01
6.6E-01
2.1E-02
3. 7E-01
1.6E+01
l.OE-01
1.9E+00
6.1E-01
4.6E+02
8. 7E-01
4.9E-01
7.8E-01
NC
4.3E-01
4.9E-02
3.3E-01
6.1E-01
1.2E-03
4.0E-01
6.3E-02
5.8E-01
7.3E+00
5.5E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-ll
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.7E+00
2.8E-01
1.7E-01
6.5E-03
6.1E-02
5.1E-03
1.6E-02
6.3E-01
2.5E-02
9.1E-04
1.4E-02
1.3E-02
4.6E-03
7.8E-02
2.0E-02
8.7E+00
1.2E-01
8.8E-02
5.5E-03
5.2E-02
7.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.9E-01
2.2E-02
4.5E-04
1.7E-02
7.5E-03
3.0E-03
1.2E-01
1.2E-02
5.1E+00
4.6E-01
5.6E-01
5.7E-03
7.6E-02
5.2E-03
2.6E-02
1.2E+00
2.5E-02
2.0E-03
1.5E-02
4.6E-02
5.7E-03
8.5E-02
3.5E-02
6.0E+00
6.3E-01
8.2E-01
1.8E-02
9.0E-02
6.1E-03
2.3E-02
1.5E+00
4.2E-02
1.8E-03
1.9E-02
5.0E-02
8.5E-03
8.9E-02
3.3E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
Plants
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.9E+00
9.5E-01
8.2E-01
6.8E-03
1.5E+00
5.2E-03
1.6E-02
1.2E+00
2.6E-02
1.4E-02
1.5E-02
6.3E+00
4.9E-03
7.9E-02
2.0E-02
1.2E+01
7.9E-01
7.4E-01
5. 7E-03
1.5E+00
7.5E-03
6. 7E-03
8. 7E-01
2.3E-02
1.3E-02
1.8E-02
6.3E+00
3.3E-03
1.2E-01
1.3E-02
8.4E+00
1.1E+00
1.2E+00
6.0E-03
1.5E+00
5.2E-03
2.6E-02
1.8E+00
2.5E-02
1.5E-02
1.6E-02
6.3E+00
6.0E-03
8.6E-02
3.5E-02
9.2E+00
1.3E+00
1.5E+00
1.8E-02
1.6E+00
6.2E-03
2.3E-02
2.0E+00
4.2E-02
1.4E-02
2.0E-02
6.3E+00
8.8E-03
9.0E-02
3.3E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-ll
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
5.3E+00
5.3E-01
5.1E-01
l.OE-02
1.2E-01
5.7E-03
4.4E-02
1.3E+00
5.5E-02
3.9E-03
1.6E-02
5.1E-02
8.8E-03
9.3E-02
6.1E-02
3.9E+00
3.3E-01
2.5E-01
5.0E-03
6.5E-02
4.0E-03
1.4E-02
9.6E-01
2.0E-02
l.OE-03
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
3.4E-03
6.8E-02
1.8E-02
4.3E+00
2.1E-01
2.3E-01
6.4E-03
4.7E-02
5.5E-03
6.1E-02
4.9E-01
4.0E-02
6.7E-04
1.9E-02
2.2E-02
4.3E-03
6.3E-02
5.2E-02
5.2E+00
7.4E-02
1.4E-01
6.6E-03
1.2E-02
5.0E-03
3.5E-03
2.4E-01
3.1E-02
1.2E-04
1.3E-02
3.1E-03
2.2E-03
8.0E-02
1.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
Plants
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
8.5E+00
1.2E+00
1.2E+00
l.OE-02
1.6E+00
5.8E-03
4.4E-02
1.9E+00
5.6E-02
1. 7E-02
1. 7E-02
6.3E+00
9.1E-03
9.5E-02
6.1E-02
7.2E+00
l.OE+00
9.0E-01
5.3E-03
1.5E+00
4.1E-03
1.4E-02
1.5E+00
2.0E-02
1.4E-02
1.4E-02
6.3E+00
3. 7E-03
6.9E-02
1.9E-02
7.6E+00
8.8E-01
8.8E-01
6. 7E-03
1.5E+00
5.6E-03
6.1E-02
1.1E+00
4.0E-02
1.3E-02
2.1E-02
6.3E+00
4.6E-03
6.4E-02
5.3E-02
8.4E+00
7.4E-01
8.0E-01
6.9E-03
1.5E+00
5.1E-03
3. 7E-03
8.3E-01
3.2E-02
1.3E-02
1.4E-02
6.3E+00
2.5E-03
8.1E-02
1.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table B-ll
HQ TYPE B: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.9E+00
1.7E-01
2.4E-01
8.4E-03
1.4E-02
4.0E-03
7.7E-03
4.5E-01
2.0E-02
3.0E-04
1.1E-02
9.6E-03
2.6E-03
6.6E-02
9.6E-03
4.5E+00
1.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.9E-03
2.7E-02
5.2E-03
1.1E-02
3.9E-01
2.5E-02
4.4E-04
1.6E-02
1.1E-02
2.8E-03
6.4E-02
2.3E-02
5.1E+00
2.9E-01
4.3E-01
7.5E-03
5.1E-02
5.4E-03
1.8E-02
6.8E-01
2.9E-02
9.3E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-02
4.5E-03
8.1E-02
2.7E-02
2.0E+01
3.8E-02
2.1E-02
3.4E-02
1.9E-02
2.2E-03
1.4E-02
2.7E-02
5.2E-05
1.7E-02
2.8E-03
2.5E-02
3.2E-01
2.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
3.8E-03
2.8E-04
8.0E-04
9.3E-05
2.1E-04
5.8E-03
5.7E-04
3.3E-05
1.2E-03
2.7E-03
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.0E-04
Plants
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
1.4E+00
4.0E-01
3.5E-01
9.8E-01
3.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.2E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E-01
3.0E-01
4.8E-01
2.5E-01
2.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.2E+00
8.4E-01
9.0E-01
8. 7E-03
1.5E+00
4.1E-03
8.0E-03
l.OE+00
2.1E-02
1.3E-02
1.2E-02
6.3E+00
2.9E-03
6. 7E-02
9.9E-03
7.7E+00
8.2E-01
8.6E-01
7.2E-03
1.5E+00
5.3E-03
1.1E-02
9.8E-01
2.5E-02
1.3E-02
1. 7E-02
6.3E+00
3.0E-03
6.5E-02
2.3E-02
8.3E+00
9.6E-01
1.1E+00
7.8E-03
1.5E+00
5.5E-03
1.8E-02
1.3E+00
2.9E-02
1.4E-02
1. 7E-02
6.3E+00
4.8E-03
8.2E-02
2. 7E-02
2.0E+01
3.8E-02
2.1E-02
3.4E-02
NC
1.9E-02
2.2E-03
1.4E-02
2. 7E-02
5.2E-05
1. 7E-02
2.8E-03
2.5E-02
3.2E-01
2.4E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-l
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-l
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-l
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red-tailed Hawk 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
NC
1.4E-04
1. 7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
NC
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-2
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.4E-01
2.0E-02
1.6E-02
4.7E-04
5.6E-03
3.5E-04
1.6E-03
6.5E-02
1.8E-03
9.4E-05
l.OE-03
1.4E-03
3.3E-04
5.5E-03
1.9E-03
7.5E-01
9.8E-03
7.0E-03
4.2E-04
3.9E-03
6.2E-04
5.1E-04
2.3E-02
1.7E-03
3.5E-05
1.3E-03
6.9E-04
2.3E-04
9.5E-03
9.5E-04
3.2E-01
3.1E-02
3.0E-02
3.5E-04
4.1E-03
3.1E-04
1.4E-03
8.2E-02
1.5E-03
1.2E-04
9.6E-04
2.9E-03
2.7E-04
5.6E-03
1.7E-03
3.3E-01
7.7E-02
8.3E-02
1.2E-03
5.2E-03
3.6E-04
1.7E-03
1.1E-01
2.2E-03
2.0E-04
1.1E-03
6.0E-03
7.0E-04
5.3E-03
1.9E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
Plants
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.3E-01
l.OE-01
7.8E-02
5.5E-04
2.0E-01
3.8E-04
1.6E-03
1.3E-01
2.1E-03
2.6E-03
1.3E-03
6.0E-01
4.0E-04
6.1E-03
2.0E-03
1.1E+00
9.0E-02
6.9E-02
4.9E-04
2.0E-01
6.4E-04
5.4E-04
8. 7E-02
1.9E-03
2.5E-03
1.6E-03
6.0E-01
3.0E-04
l.OE-02
1.1E-03
7.2E-01
1.1E-01
9.2E-02
4.3E-04
2.0E-01
3.4E-04
1.4E-03
1.5E-01
1. 7E-03
2.6E-03
1.2E-03
6.0E-01
3.4E-04
6.2E-03
1.8E-03
7.3E-01
1.6E-01
1.5E-01
1.2E-03
2.0E-01
3.8E-04
1. 7E-03
1.8E-01
2.5E-03
2. 7E-03
1.4E-03
6.0E-01
7. 7E-04
5.9E-03
2.0E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-2
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.7E-01
4.8E-02
4.1E-02
6.9E-04
7.0E-03
4.0E-04
2.5E-03
1.1E-01
3.7E-03
4.0E-04
1.1E-03
4.7E-03
7.1E-04
6.6E-03
8.5E-03
3.2E-01
2.6E-02
1.6E-02
3.6E-04
4.6E-03
3.1E-04
1.2E-03
7.4E-02
1.4E-03
8.2E-05
9.3E-04
3.3E-03
2.5E-04
5.1E-03
l.OE-03
2.7E-01
1.7E-02
1.7E-02
4.0E-04
3.9E-03
3.3E-04
5.9E-03
5.0E-02
2.5E-03
5.8E-05
1.2E-03
1.9E-03
4.0E-04
3.8E-03
5.0E-03
2.3E-01
3.1E-03
7.6E-03
3.5E-04
5.4E-04
2.6E-04
4.1E-04
l.OE-02
1.7E-03
8.6E-06
7.2E-04
2.1E-04
1.2E-04
3.7E-03
5.7E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
Plants
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7. 7E-01
1.3E-01
l.OE-01
7.6E-04
2.0E-01
4.3E-04
2.6E-03
1. 7E-01
3.9E-03
2.9E-03
1.3E-03
6.0E-01
7.9E-04
7.2E-03
8.6E-03
7.2E-01
1.1E-01
7.8E-02
4.4E-04
2.0E-01
3.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.4E-01
1.6E-03
2.6E-03
1.2E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-04
5. 7E-03
LIE-OS
6. 7E-01
9.8E-02
8.0E-02
4.8E-04
2.0E-01
3.6E-04
5.9E-03
1.1E-01
2.8E-03
2.5E-03
1.5E-03
6.0E-01
4.8E-04
4.4E-03
5.1E-03
6.3E-01
8.4E-02
7.0E-02
4.3E-04
2.0E-01
2.9E-04
4.4E-04
7.4E-02
1.9E-03
2.5E-03
9.8E-04
6.0E-01
1.9E-04
4.3E-03
6.9E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-2
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mule Deer
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.3E-01
9.8E-03
1.6E-02
5.2E-04
7.8E-04
2.2E-04
5.1E-04
2.5E-02
1.1E-03
2.6E-05
6.2E-04
5.3E-04
1.2E-04
3.4E-03
5.6E-04
2.5E-01
8.4E-03
8.7E-03
3.9E-04
1.5E-03
2.9E-04
5.7E-04
2.1E-02
1.4E-03
2.5E-05
8.5E-04
5.0E-04
1.2E-04
3.6E-03
1.2E-03
2.6E-01
1.3E-02
1.7E-02
4.6E-04
2.2E-03
2.9E-04
7.9E-04
3.1E-02
1.5E-03
5.0E-05
8.3E-04
8.6E-04
1.6E-04
4.1E-03
1.1E-03
1.2E+00
2.5E-03
1.1E-03
1.5E-03
1.1E-03
9.7E-05
1.7E-03
1.2E-03
1.6E-05
9.6E-04
1.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
3.5E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
Plants
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
6.2E-01
9.0E-02
7.9E-02
6.0E-04
2.0E-01
2.5E-04
5.5E-04
8.9E-02
1.4E-03
2.5E-03
8.8E-04
6.0E-01
1.9E-04
4.0E-03
6.8E-04
6.5E-01
8.9E-02
7.1E-02
4.6E-04
2.0E-01
3.2E-04
6.0E-04
8.5E-02
1.6E-03
2.5E-03
LIE-OS
6.0E-01
1.9E-04
4.2E-03
1.4E-03
6.5E-01
9.3E-02
7.9E-02
5.3E-04
2.0E-01
3.1E-04
8.3E-04
9.4E-02
1. 7E-03
2.5E-03
1.1E-03
6.0E-01
2.4E-04
4. 7E-03
1.3E-03
1.2E+00
2.5E-03
LIE-OS
1.5E-03
NC
LIE-OS
9. 7E-05
1. 7E-03
1.2E-03
1.6E-05
9.6E-04
1.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
3.5E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-3
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: \_
Red Fox
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.3E+00
7.9E-02
6.2E-02
1.9E-03
2.2E-02
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
7.3E-03
3.7E-04
4.1E-03
5.6E-03
1.3E-03
2.2E-02
7.5E-03
3.0E+00
3.9E-02
2.8E-02
1.7E-03
1.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.0E-03
9.0E-02
6.6E-03
1.4E-04
5.3E-03
2.8E-03
9.1E-04
3.8E-02
3.8E-03
1.3E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E-01
1.4E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
5.4E-03
3.3E-01
5.8E-03
4.7E-04
3.8E-03
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
2.2E-02
6.8E-03
1.3E+00
3.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.6E-03
2.1E-02
1.4E-03
6.6E-03
4.4E-01
8.9E-03
7.9E-04
4.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.8E-03
2.1E-02
7.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.6E+00
1.2E-01
8.9E-02
2.0E-03
l.OE-01
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.9E-01
7. 7E-03
1.4E-03
4.6E-03
2.6E-01
1.5E-03
2.3E-02
7. 7E-03
3.3E+00
7. 7E-02
5.5E-02
1.8E-03
9.8E-02
2.5E-03
2.1E-03
1.2E-01
7.0E-03
1.2E-03
5.8E-03
2.5E-01
LIE-OS
3.9E-02
4.0E-03
1.5E+00
1.6E-01
1.5E-01
1.5E-03
9.8E-02
1.3E-03
5.5E-03
3.6E-01
6.2E-03
1.5E-03
4.3E-03
2.6E-01
1.2E-03
2.3E-02
7.0E-03
1.6E+00
3.4E-01
3.6E-01
4.8E-03
l.OE-01
1.5E-03
6. 7E-03
4. 7E-01
9.3E-03
1.8E-03
4.9E-03
2. 7E-01
2.9E-03
2.2E-02
7.8E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-3
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: \_
Red Fox
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.7E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.3E-01
1.5E-02
1.6E-03
4.3E-03
1.9E-02
2.8E-03
2.6E-02
3.4E-02
1.3E+00
l.OE-01
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
1.8E-02
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
2.9E-01
5.4E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-03
1.3E-02
l.OE-03
2.0E-02
4.1E-03
1.1E+00
6.8E-02
6.9E-02
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
2.3E-04
4.7E-03
7.5E-03
1.6E-03
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
9.1E-01
1.2E-02
3.0E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-03
l.OE-03
1.6E-03
4.0E-02
6.9E-03
3.4E-05
2.8E-03
8.5E-04
4.8E-04
1.5E-02
2.3E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.7E+00
2.3E-01
1.9E-01
2.9E-03
1.1E-01
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.6E-01
1.5E-02
2.6E-03
4.8E-03
2. 7E-01
3.0E-03
2. 7E-02
3.4E-02
1.5E+00
1.4E-01
9.1E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-01
1.3E-03
4.8E-03
3.2E-01
5.8E-03
1.4E-03
4.2E-03
2.6E-01
1.1E-03
2.1E-02
4.3E-03
1.3E+00
1.1E-01
9. 7E-02
1. 7E-03
9.8E-02
1.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.3E-01
l.OE-02
1.3E-03
5.2E-03
2.6E-01
1. 7E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E-02
1.2E+00
5.0E-02
5.8E-02
1.5E-03
8.4E-02
1.1E-03
1. 7E-03
7.1E-02
7.3E-03
1.1E-03
3.4E-03
2.5E-01
6.2E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-3
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: \_
Red Fox
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.0E-01
3.9E-02
6.5E-02
2.1E-03
3.1E-03
8.8E-04
2.0E-03
l.OE-01
4.5E-03
l.OE-04
2.4E-03
2.1E-03
4.7E-04
1.3E-02
2.2E-03
9.9E-01
3.3E-02
3.5E-02
1.5E-03
5.9E-03
1.2E-03
2.2E-03
8.4E-02
5.5E-03
9.9E-05
3.4E-03
2.0E-03
4.6E-04
1.4E-02
4.9E-03
l.OE+00
5.1E-02
6.6E-02
1.8E-03
8.9E-03
1.1E-03
3.1E-03
1.2E-01
6.0E-03
2.0E-04
3.3E-03
3.4E-03
6.4E-04
1.6E-02
4.5E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.2E+00
7. 7E-02
9.3E-02
2.2E-03
8.5E-02
9.3E-04
2.1E-03
1.3E-01
5.0E-03
LIE-OS
2.9E-03
2.5E-01
6.2E-04
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.2E+00
7.1E-02
6.2E-02
1. 7E-03
8.8E-02
1.2E-03
2.3E-03
1.2E-01
5.9E-03
1.1E-03
3.9E-03
2.5E-01
6.0E-04
1.5E-02
5.2E-03
1.3E+00
8.9E-02
9.4E-02
2.0E-03
9.1E-02
1.2E-03
3.2E-03
1.5E-01
6.4E-03
1.2E-03
3.8E-03
2.5E-01
7.9E-04
1. 7E-02
4. 7E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-4
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.2E+00
2.0E-01
9.6E-02
3.4E-01
1.2E-01
6.9E-01
2.2E+01
4.1E-02
5.2E-02
2.8E-02
8.6E-02
3.7E-02
2.5E-01
4.8E+00
8.9E-02
8.4E-02
2.4E-01
2.1E-01
2.2E-01
7.6E+00
3.6E-02
1.9E-02
3.6E-02
4.3E-02
6.4E-02
1.3E-01
2.1E+00
3.9E-01
7.1E-02
2.5E-01
1.1E-01
5.9E-01
2.7E+01
3.2E-02
6.5E-02
2.6E-02
1.8E-01
3.8E-02
2.3E-01
2.1E+00
1.1E+00
2.4E-01
3.1E-01
1.2E-01
7.2E-01
3.7E+01
4.9E-02
1.1E-01
3.0E-02
3.7E-01
3.6E-02
2.5E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.5E+00
NC
2.9E-01
9. 7E-02
1.2E+00
1.2E-01
6.9E-01
2.4E+01
4.1E-02
5.2E-02
2.8E-02
3.2E+00
NC
3. 7E-02
2.5E-01
5.1E+00
NC
1.8E-01
8.5E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E-01
2.2E-01
l.OE+01
3.6E-02
1.9E-02
3.6E-02
3.2E+00
NC
6.4E-02
1.3E-01
2.4E+00
NC
4.8E-01
7.2E-02
1.1E+00
1.1E-01
5.9E-01
3.0E+01
3.2E-02
6.6E-02
2.6E-02
3.3E+00
NC
3.8E-02
2.3E-01
2.4E+00
NC
1.2E+00
2.4E-01
1.2E+00
1.2E-01
7.2E-01
4.0E+01
4.9E-02
1.1E-01
3.0E-02
3.5E+00
NC
3.6E-02
2.6E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-4
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.4E+00
5.2E-01
1.4E-01
4.2E-01
1.4E-01
1.1E+00
3.6E+01
8.1E-02
2.2E-01
2.9E-02
2.9E-01
4.5E-02
1.1E+00
2.1E+00
2.1E-01
7.3E-02
2.8E-01
1.1E-01
5.2E-01
2.4E+01
3.0E-02
4.5E-02
2.5E-02
2.0E-01
3.4E-02
1.4E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E-01
8.2E-02
2.4E-01
1.1E-01
2.5E+00
1.7E+01
5.6E-02
3.2E-02
3.2E-02
1.2E-01
2.6E-02
6.7E-01
1.5E+00
9.7E-02
7.1E-02
3.3E-02
8.8E-02
1.8E-01
3.3E+00
3.8E-02
4.7E-03
1.9E-02
1.3E-02
2.5E-02
7.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.7E+00
NC
6.1E-01
1.4E-01
1.3E+00
1.4E-01
1.1E+00
3.9E+01
8.1E-02
2.2E-01
2.9E-02
3.4E+00
NC
4.5E-02
1.1E+00
2.4E+00
NC
3.0E-01
7.4E-02
1.1E+00
1.1E-01
5.2E-01
2.7E+01
3.0E-02
4.5E-02
2.5E-02
3.3E+00
NC
3.5E-02
1.4E-01
2.0E+00
NC
3.1E-01
8.2E-02
1.1E+00
1.1E-01
2.5E+00
1.9E+01
5.6E-02
3.2E-02
3.2E-02
3.2E+00
NC
2.6E-02
6. 7E-01
1.8E+00
NC
1.9E-01
7.2E-02
8.9E-01
8.9E-02
1.8E-01
6.0E+00
3.8E-02
4.9E-03
2.0E-02
3.1E+00
NC
2.5E-02
7.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-4
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Cliff Swallow 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+00
2.1E-01
1.1E-01
4.7E-02
7.5E-02
2.2E-01
8.4E+00
2.5E-02
1.4E-02
1.6E-02
3.2E-02
2.3E-02
7.4E-02
1.6E+00
1.1E-01
7.9E-02
9.0E-02
l.OE-01
2.4E-01
7.0E+00
3.0E-02
1.4E-02
2.3E-02
3.0E-02
2.4E-02
1.7E-01
1.6E+00
2.1E-01
9.2E-02
1.4E-01
9.7E-02
3.4E-01
l.OE+01
3.3E-02
2.7E-02
2.2E-02
5.3E-02
2.8E-02
1.5E-01
7.5E+00
1.4E-02
3.0E-01
3.6E-01
4.2E-02
5.6E-01
2.7E-02
8.9E-03
2.6E-02
1.1E-02
1.1E-01
4.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.7E+00
NC
3.0E-01
1.1E-01
9.0E-01
7.5E-02
2.2E-01
1.1E+01
2.5E-02
1.4E-02
1. 7E-02
3.1E+00
NC
2.3E-02
7.5E-02
1.9E+00
NC
2.0E-01
7.9E-02
9.5E-01
l.OE-01
2.5E-01
9.7E+00
3.1E-02
1.4E-02
2.3E-02
3.1E+00
NC
2.4E-02
1. 7E-01
1.9E+00
NC
3.0E-01
9.3E-02
9.9E-01
9. 7E-02
3.4E-01
1.3E+01
3.3E-02
2.8E-02
2.3E-02
3.2E+00
NC
2.8E-02
1.5E-01
7.5E+00
NC
1.4E-02
3.0E-01
NC
3.6E-01
4.2E-02
5.6E-01
2. 7E-02
8.9E-03
2.6E-02
1.1E-02
NC
1.1E-01
4.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-5
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
7.0E-01
6.4E-02
3.1E-02
1.1E-01
3.8E-02
2.2E-01
7.0E+00
1.3E-02
1.7E-02
8.9E-03
2.8E-02
1.2E-02
8.1E-02
1.6E+00
2.9E-02
2.7E-02
7.7E-02
6.7E-02
7.0E-02
2.4E+00
1.2E-02
6.2E-03
1.2E-02
1.4E-02
2.1E-02
4.1E-02
6.7E-01
1.2E-01
2.3E-02
8.1E-02
3.4E-02
1.9E-01
8.8E+00
l.OE-02
2.1E-02
8.3E-03
5.8E-02
1.2E-02
7.3E-02
6.9E-01
3.4E-01
7.6E-02
l.OE-01
3.9E-02
2.3E-01
1.2E+01
1.6E-02
3.5E-02
9.6E-03
1.2E-01
1.1E-02
8.2E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
Plants
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
8.1E-01
NC
l.OE-01
3.1E-02
6.8E-01
3.9E-02
2.2E-01
8.0E+00
1.3E-02
1.8E-01
9.1E-03
1.8E+00
NC
1.2E-02
8.1E-02
1.7E+00
NC
6. 7E-02
2.8E-02
6.5E-01
6.8E-02
7.1E-02
3.4E+00
1.2E-02
1. 7E-01
1.2E-02
1.8E+00
NC
2.1E-02
4.1E-02
7.8E-01
NC
1.6E-01
2.3E-02
6.5E-01
3.5E-02
1.9E-01
9.8E+00
l.OE-02
1.9E-01
8.5E-03
1.8E+00
NC
1.2E-02
7.4E-02
8.0E-01
NC
3.8E-01
7.6E-02
6. 7E-01
3.9E-02
2.3E-01
1.3E+01
1.6E-02
2.0E-01
9. 7E-03
1.9E+00
NC
1.2E-02
8.3E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-5
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
7.7E-01
1.7E-01
4.5E-02
1.4E-01
4.4E-02
3.5E-01
1.2E+01
2.6E-02
7.2E-02
9.4E-03
9.3E-02
1.4E-02
3.6E-01
6.7E-01
6.7E-02
2.4E-02
8.9E-02
3.4E-02
1.7E-01
7.9E+00
9.7E-03
1.5E-02
8.1E-03
6.6E-02
1.1E-02
4.4E-02
5.6E-01
7.3E-02
2.6E-02
7.7E-02
3.7E-02
8.2E-01
5.4E+00
1.8E-02
l.OE-02
l.OE-02
3.7E-02
8.3E-03
2.1E-01
4.7E-01
3.1E-02
2.3E-02
1.1E-02
2.8E-02
5.7E-02
1.1E+00
1.2E-02
1.5E-03
6.2E-03
4.2E-03
8.0E-03
2.4E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
Plants
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
8.9E-01
NC
2.1E-01
4.5E-02
7.1E-01
4.4E-02
3.6E-01
1.3E+01
2.6E-02
2.4E-01
9.6E-03
1.9E+00
NC
1.4E-02
3.6E-01
7.8E-01
NC
1.1E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-01
3.4E-02
1. 7E-01
8.9E+00
9.8E-03
1.8E-01
8.2E-03
1.8E+00
NC
1.1E-02
4.4E-02
6. 7E-01
NC
1.1E-01
2. 7E-02
6.5E-01
3. 7E-02
8.2E-01
6.4E+00
1.8E-02
1.8E-01
l.OE-02
1.8E+00
NC
8.3E-03
2.2E-01
5.9E-01
NC
7.0E-02
2.3E-02
5.8E-01
2.9E-02
5. 7E-02
2.1E+00
1.2E-02
1. 7E-01
6.4E-03
1.8E+00
NC
8.1E-03
2.5E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-5
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.7E-01
6.8E-02
3.4E-02
1.5E-02
2.4E-02
7.1E-02
2.7E+00
8.1E-03
4.6E-03
5.3E-03
l.OE-02
7.4E-03
2.4E-02
5.1E-01
3.6E-02
2.5E-02
2.9E-02
3.2E-02
7.9E-02
2.3E+00
9.8E-03
4.5E-03
7.3E-03
9.8E-03
7.8E-03
5.3E-02
5.3E-01
6.9E-02
3.0E-02
4.4E-02
3.1E-02
1.1E-01
3.3E+00
1.1E-02
8.9E-03
7.2E-03
1.7E-02
8.9E-03
4.8E-02
2.4E+00
4.6E-03
9.6E-02
1.2E-01
1.3E-02
1.8E-01
8.7E-03
2.9E-03
8.3E-03
3.7E-03
3.5E-02
1.5E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
Plants
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.8E-01
NC
1.1E-01
3.4E-02
5.9E-01
2.4E-02
7.1E-02
3.7E+00
8.2E-03
1. 7E-01
5.5E-03
1.8E+00
NC
7.5E-03
2.4E-02
6.3E-01
NC
7.5E-02
2.6E-02
6.0E-01
3.2E-02
7.9E-02
3.3E+00
9.9E-03
1. 7E-01
7.5E-03
1.8E+00
NC
7.8E-03
5.4E-02
6.5E-01
NC
1.1E-01
3.0E-02
6.1E-01
3.1E-02
1.1E-01
4.3E+00
1.1E-02
1. 7E-01
7.4E-03
1.8E+00
NC
9.0E-03
4.9E-02
2.4E+00
NC
4.6E-03
9.6E-02
NC
1.2E-01
1.3E-02
1.8E-01
8. 7E-03
2.9E-03
8.3E-03
3. 7E-03
NC
3.5E-02
1.5E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-6
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-6
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-6
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
4.3E+00
8.1E-01
6.5E-01
2.5E-04
1.3E+00
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
7.6E-01
7.2E-04
1. 7E-05
8.8E-04
4.8E+00
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-7
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mallard
Work Area
WAS
WA7
All Work Areas
Utah Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
7.6E-01
1.2E-01
2.0E-02
6.7E-02
3.9E-02
1.6E-01
7.5E+00
7.8E-03
1.9E-02
8.4E-03
3.7E-02
l.OE-02
6.0E-02
2.2E-01
8.3E-03
8.2E-03
9.8E-03
1.3E-02
5.3E-02
6.7E-01
3.9E-03
2.7E-03
3.3E-03
1.2E-02
3.5E-03
2.0E-02
3.7E-01
3.4E-02
1.2E-02
2.5E-02
1.7E-02
7.4E-02
2.5E+00
4.8E-03
1.9E-02
4.3E-03
2.2E-02
5.5E-03
2.6E-02
1.3E+00
2.5E-03
5.3E-02
6.4E-02
7.5E-03
9.9E-02
4.8E-03
1.6E-03
4.6E-03
2.0E-03
1.9E-02
8.2E-03
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
9.9E-05
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.0E-05
7.8E-05
5.1E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
9.9E-05
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.0E-05
7.8E-05
5.1E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
9.9E-05
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.0E-05
7.8E-05
5.1E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surface/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.7E-01
NC
1.2E-01
2.0E-02
6.7E-02
3.9E-02
1.6E-01
7.5E+00
7.9E-03
1.9E-02
8.4E-03
3.8E-02
NC
l.OE-02
6.0E-02
2.2E-01
NC
8.4E-03
8.3E-03
l.OE-02
1.3E-02
5.3E-02
6.8E-01
3.9E-03
2.7E-03
3.4E-03
1.2E-02
NC
3.6E-03
2.0E-02
3.7E-01
NC
3.4E-02
1.2E-02
2.5E-02
1.8E-02
7.4E-02
2.5E+00
4.9E-03
1.9E-02
4.4E-03
2.3E-02
NC
5.5E-03
2.6E-02
1.3E+00
NC
2.5E-03
5.3E-02
NC
6.4E-02
7.5E-03
9.9E-02
4.8E-03
1.6E-03
4.6E-03
2.0E-03
NC
1.9E-02
8.2E-03
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-8
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
7.6E-02
2.7E-01
9.4E-02
5.5E-01
1.7E+01
3.2E-02
4.1E-02
2.2E-02
6.8E-02
2.9E-02
2.0E-01
3.8E+00
7.1E-02
6.7E-02
1.9E-01
1.7E-01
1.7E-01
6.0E+00
2.9E-02
1.5E-02
2.8E-02
3.4E-02
5.1E-02
l.OE-01
1.6E+00
3.1E-01
5.7E-02
2.0E-01
8.5E-02
4.7E-01
2.2E+01
2.5E-02
5.2E-02
2.0E-02
1.4E-01
3.0E-02
1.8E-01
1.7E+00
8.5E-01
1.9E-01
2.5E-01
9.6E-02
5.7E-01
2.9E+01
3.9E-02
8.7E-02
2.3E-02
2.9E-01
2.8E-02
2.0E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.0E+00
NC
2.5E-01
7. 7E-02
1.2E+00
9.4E-02
5.5E-01
2.0E+01
3.2E-02
4.1E-02
2.2E-02
3.4E+00
NC
2.9E-02
2.0E-01
4.1E+00
NC
1. 7E-01
6. 7E-02
1.1E+00
1. 7E-01
1. 7E-01
8.9E+00
2.9E-02
1.5E-02
2.9E-02
3.4E+00
NC
5.1E-02
l.OE-01
2.0E+00
NC
4.0E-01
5. 7E-02
1.1E+00
8.5E-02
4. 7E-01
2.4E+01
2.6E-02
5.2E-02
2.1E-02
3.5E+00
NC
3.0E-02
1.8E-01
2.0E+00
NC
9.4E-01
1.9E-01
1.2E+00
9.6E-02
5. 7E-01
3.2E+01
3.9E-02
8. 7E-02
2.4E-02
3.6E+00
NC
2.8E-02
2.0E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-8
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.9E+00
4.1E-01
1.1E-01
3.3E-01
1.1E-01
8.7E-01
2.9E+01
6.4E-02
1.8E-01
2.3E-02
2.3E-01
3.5E-02
8.9E-01
1.6E+00
1.6E-01
5.8E-02
2.2E-01
8.4E-02
4.1E-01
1.9E+01
2.4E-02
3.6E-02
2.0E-02
1.6E-01
2.7E-02
1.1E-01
1.4E+00
1.8E-01
6.5E-02
1.9E-01
9.0E-02
2.0E+00
1.3E+01
4.4E-02
2.5E-02
2.5E-02
9.1E-02
2.0E-02
5.3E-01
1.2E+00
7.7E-02
5.6E-02
2.6E-02
7.0E-02
1.4E-01
2.7E+00
3.0E-02
3.8E-03
1.5E-02
l.OE-02
2.0E-02
6.0E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.2E+00
NC
5.1E-01
1.1E-01
1.2E+00
1.1E-01
8. 7E-01
3.1E+01
6.4E-02
1.8E-01
2.3E-02
3.6E+00
NC
3.5E-02
8.9E-01
1.9E+00
NC
2.6E-01
5.8E-02
1.1E+00
8.4E-02
4.1E-01
2.2E+01
2.4E-02
3.6E-02
2.0E-02
3.5E+00
NC
2. 7E-02
1.1E-01
1.7E+00
NC
2. 7E-01
6.5E-02
1.1E+00
9.0E-02
2.0E+00
1.6E+01
4.4E-02
2.5E-02
2.5E-02
3.4E+00
NC
2.0E-02
5.3E-01
1.5E+00
NC
1. 7E-01
5. 7E-02
9.4E-01
7.0E-02
1.4E-01
5.5E+00
3.0E-02
3.8E-03
1.5E-02
3.3E+00
NC
2.0E-02
6.0E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-8
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.2E+00
1.7E-01
8.4E-02
3.7E-02
5.9E-02
1.7E-01
6.7E+00
2.0E-02
1.1E-02
1.3E-02
2.6E-02
1.8E-02
5.9E-02
1.3E+00
8.9E-02
6.3E-02
7.1E-02
7.9E-02
1.9E-01
5.6E+00
2.4E-02
1.1E-02
1.8E-02
2.4E-02
1.9E-02
1.3E-01
1.3E+00
1.7E-01
7.3E-02
1.1E-01
7.7E-02
2.7E-01
8.1E+00
2.6E-02
2.2E-02
1.8E-02
4.2E-02
2.2E-02
1.2E-01
6.0E+00
1.1E-02
2.4E-01
2.8E-01
3.3E-02
4.4E-01
2.1E-02
7.0E-03
2.0E-02
9.0E-03
8.6E-02
3.7E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
NC
2.6E-01
8.4E-02
9.5E-01
6.0E-02
1. 7E-01
9.5E+00
2.0E-02
1.1E-02
1.3E-02
3.4E+00
NC
1.8E-02
5.9E-02
1.6E+00
NC
1.8E-01
6.3E-02
9.9E-01
7.9E-02
1.9E-01
8.4E+00
2.4E-02
1.1E-02
1.8E-02
3.3E+00
NC
1.9E-02
1.3E-01
1.6E+00
NC
2. 7E-01
7.4E-02
l.OE+00
7. 7E-02
2. 7E-01
1.1E+01
2. 7E-02
2.2E-02
1.8E-02
3.4E+00
NC
2.2E-02
1.2E-01
6.0E+00
NC
1.1E-02
2.4E-01
NC
2.8E-01
3.3E-02
4.4E-01
2.1E-02
7.0E-03
2.0E-02
9.0E-03
NC
8.6E-02
3. 7E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-9
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.6E+00
3.3E-01
1.6E-01
5.6E-01
2.0E-01
1.1E+00
3.6E+01
6.7E-02
8.6E-02
4.6E-02
1.4E-01
6.1E-02
4.1E-01
8.0E+00
1.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.9E-01
3.5E-01
3.6E-01
1.3E+01
6.0E-02
3.2E-02
5.9E-02
7.0E-02
1.1E-01
2.1E-01
3.4E+00
6.4E-01
1.2E-01
4.1E-01
1.8E-01
9.8E-01
4.5E+01
5.3E-02
1.1E-01
4.3E-02
2.9E-01
6.2E-02
3.8E-01
3.5E+00
1.8E+00
3.9E-01
5.2E-01
2.0E-01
1.2E+00
6.1E+01
8.2E-02
1.8E-01
4.9E-02
6.1E-01
5.9E-02
4.2E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
Plants
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.2E+00
NC
5.3E-01
1.6E-01
3.0E+00
2.0E-01
1.1E+00
4.1E+01
6. 7E-02
5.2E-01
4.6E-02
8.2E+00
NC
6.1E-02
4.1E-01
8.6E+00
NC
3.5E-01
1.4E-01
2.8E+00
3.5E-01
3.6E-01
1.8E+01
6.0E-02
4.6E-01
5.9E-02
8.2E+00
NC
1.1E-01
2.1E-01
4.0E+00
NC
8.4E-01
1.2E-01
2.9E+00
1.8E-01
9.8E-01
5.1E+01
5.3E-02
5.4E-01
4.3E-02
8.4E+00
NC
6.2E-02
3.8E-01
4.1E+00
NC
2.0E+00
3.9E-01
3.0E+00
2.0E-01
1.2E+00
6.7E+01
8.2E-02
6.1E-01
4.9E-02
8.7E+00
NC
5.9E-02
4.2E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-9
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.0E+00
8.6E-01
2.3E-01
7.0E-01
2.2E-01
1.8E+00
6.0E+01
1.3E-01
3.7E-01
4.8E-02
4.8E-01
7.4E-02
1.9E+00
3.4E+00
3.4E-01
1.2E-01
4.6E-01
1.7E-01
8.5E-01
4.1E+01
5.0E-02
7.5E-02
4.1E-02
3.4E-01
5.7E-02
2.3E-01
2.9E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-01
3.9E-01
1.9E-01
4.2E+00
2.8E+01
9.2E-02
5.3E-02
5.3E-02
1.9E-01
4.2E-02
1.1E+00
2.4E+00
1.6E-01
1.2E-01
5.4E-02
1.5E-01
2.9E-01
5.5E+00
6.3E-02
7.8E-03
3.2E-02
2.2E-02
4.1E-02
1.3E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
Plants
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.6E+00
NC
1.1E+00
2.3E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E-01
1.8E+00
6.5E+01
1.3E-01
8.0E-01
4.8E-02
8.6E+00
NC
7.4E-02
1.9E+00
4.0E+00
NC
5.4E-01
1.2E-01
2.9E+00
1. 7E-01
8.5E-01
4.6E+01
5.0E-02
5.0E-01
4.2E-02
8.4E+00
NC
5. 7E-02
2.3E-01
3.5E+00
NC
5. 7E-01
1.4E-01
2.8E+00
1.9E-01
4.2E+00
3.3E+01
9.2E-02
4.8E-01
5.3E-02
8.3E+00
NC
4.2E-02
1.1E+00
3.0E+00
NC
3.6E-01
1.2E-01
2.5E+00
1.5E-01
2.9E-01
1.1E+01
6.3E-02
4.4E-01
3.2E-02
8.1E+00
NC
4.1E-02
1.3E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-9
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.4E+00
3.5E-01
1.7E-01
7.8E-02
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+01
4.2E-02
2.4E-02
2.7E-02
5.3E-02
3.8E-02
1.2E-01
2.6E+00
1.9E-01
1.3E-01
1.5E-01
1.6E-01
4.0E-01
1.2E+01
5.0E-02
2.3E-02
3.8E-02
5.0E-02
4.0E-02
2.7E-01
2.7E+00
3.6E-01
1.5E-01
2.2E-01
1.6E-01
5.6E-01
1.7E+01
5.5E-02
4.5E-02
3.7E-02
8.8E-02
4.6E-02
2.5E-01
1.2E+01
2.3E-02
4.9E-01
5.9E-01
6.9E-02
9.2E-01
4.5E-02
1.5E-02
4.3E-02
1.9E-02
1.8E-01
7.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
1.1E-02
3.3E-04
4.1E-04
5.7E-04
2.4E-04
4.3E-04
2.5E-02
1.2E-04
7.3E-05
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
1.1E-04
4.5E-04
Plants
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
1.5E+00
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
4.6E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
4.9E-02
4.8E-01
1.5E+00
1.7E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.0E+00
NC
5.5E-01
1.8E-01
2.5E+00
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.9E+01
4.2E-02
4.5E-01
2. 7E-02
8.2E+00
NC
3.8E-02
1.2E-01
3.2E+00
NC
3.8E-01
1.3E-01
2.6E+00
1.6E-01
4.1E-01
1.7E+01
5.0E-02
4.5E-01
3.8E-02
8.2E+00
NC
4.0E-02
2. 7E-01
3.3E+00
NC
5.5E-01
1.5E-01
2.7E+00
1.6E-01
5. 7E-01
2.2E+01
5.5E-02
4.8E-01
3. 7E-02
8.2E+00
NC
4.6E-02
2.5E-01
1.2E+01
NC
2.3E-02
4.9E-01
NC
5.9E-01
6.9E-02
9.2E-01
4.5E-02
1.5E-02
4.3E-02
1.9E-02
NC
1.8E-01
7.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-10
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
l.OE+02
6.1E+00
4.8E+00
1.5E-01
1.7E+00
1.1E-01
4.9E-01
2.0E+01
5.7E-01
2.9E-02
3.2E-01
4.3E-01
l.OE-01
1.7E+00
5.8E-01
2.3E+02
3.0E+00
2.1E+00
1.3E-01
1.2E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
7.0E+00
5.1E-01
1.1E-02
4.1E-01
2.1E-01
7.1E-02
2.9E+00
2.9E-01
9.9E+01
9.4E+00
9.3E+00
1.1E-01
1.3E+00
9.7E-02
4.2E-01
2.5E+01
4.5E-01
3.6E-02
3.0E-01
9.0E-01
8.2E-02
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
l.OE+02
2.4E+01
2.6E+01
3.6E-01
1.6E+00
1.1E-01
5.1E-01
3.4E+01
6.9E-01
6.1E-02
3.4E-01
1.8E+00
2.1E-01
1.6E+00
5.9E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+02
7.9E+00
6.2E+00
1.5E-01
4.7E+00
1.1E-01
4.9E-01
2.2E+01
5. 7E-01
2.9E-02
3.2E-01
1.1E+01
l.OE-01
1.7E+00
5.8E-01
2.4E+02
4.8E+00
3.6E+00
1.3E-01
4.1E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
8.7E+00
5.1E-01
1.1E-02
4.1E-01
1.1E+01
7.1E-02
2.9E+00
2.9E-01
1.1E+02
1.1E+01
1.1E+01
1.1E-01
4.2E+00
9. 7E-02
4.2E-01
2.7E+01
4.5E-01
3. 7E-02
3.0E-01
1.1E+01
8.3E-02
1.7E+00
5.3E-01
1.1E+02
2.6E+01
2.7E+01
3.6E-01
4.5E+00
1.1E-01
5.1E-01
3.6E+01
6.9E-01
6.1E-02
3.4E-01
1.2E+01
2.1E-01
1.6E+00
5.9E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-10
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.2E+02
1.5E+01
1.2E+01
2.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.2E-01
7.8E-01
3.3E+01
1.1E+00
1.2E-01
3.3E-01
1.5E+00
2.2E-01
2.0E+00
2.6E+00
9.9E+01
8.0E+00
4.9E+00
1.1E-01
1.4E+00
9.6E-02
3.7E-01
2.3E+01
4.2E-01
2.5E-02
2.9E-01
l.OE+00
7.8E-02
1.6E+00
3.1E-01
8.3E+01
5.3E+00
5.4E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E+00
l.OE-01
1.8E+00
1.5E+01
7.8E-01
1.8E-02
3.7E-01
5.8E-01
1.2E-01
1.2E+00
1.5E+00
7.0E+01
9.7E-01
2.3E+00
1.1E-01
1.7E-01
8.0E-02
1.3E-01
3.1E+00
5.3E-01
2.6E-03
2.2E-01
6.6E-02
3.7E-02
1.1E+00
1.8E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.2E+02
1.6E+01
1.4E+01
2.1E-01
5.1E+00
1.2E-01
7.8E-01
3.5E+01
1.1E+00
1.2E-01
3.4E-01
1.2E+01
2.2E-01
2.0E+00
2.6E+00
1.1E+02
9.8E+00
6.4E+00
1.1E-01
4.3E+00
9.6E-02
3. 7E-01
2.4E+01
4.2E-01
2.5E-02
2.9E-01
1.2E+01
7.8E-02
1.6E+00
3.2E-01
9.2E+01
7.0E+00
6.8E+00
1.2E-01
4.1E+00
l.OE-01
1.8E+00
1.7E+01
7.8E-01
1.8E-02
3. 7E-01
1.1E+01
1.2E-01
1.2E+00
1.5E+00
8.0E+01
2.7E+00
3.8E+00
1.1E-01
3.1E+00
8.0E-02
1.3E-01
4.8E+00
5.4E-01
2. 7E-03
2.2E-01
1.1E+01
3. 7E-02
1.1E+00
1.8E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-10
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
7.0E+01
3.0E+00
5.1E+00
1.6E-01
2.4E-01
6.8E-02
1.6E-01
7.8E+00
3.5E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
3.7E-02
l.OE+00
1.7E-01
7.7E+01
2.6E+00
2.7E+00
1.2E-01
4.6E-01
9.1E-02
1.7E-01
6.5E+00
4.3E-01
7.7E-03
2.6E-01
1.5E-01
3.6E-02
1.1E+00
3.8E-01
7.9E+01
4.0E+00
5.1E+00
1.4E-01
6.9E-01
8.8E-02
2.4E-01
9.4E+00
4.7E-01
1.5E-02
2.6E-01
2.7E-01
5.0E-02
1.3E+00
3.5E-01
3.6E+02
7.7E-01
3.4E-01
4.5E-01
3.3E-01
3.0E-02
5.2E-01
3.8E-01
4.9E-03
3.0E-01
5.7E-02
4.8E-01
5.0E+00
1.1E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
2.5E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
l.OE-04
1.4E-04
1.1E-02
8.2E-04
1.9E-05
l.OE-03
2.9E-03
2.8E-04
2.3E-03
4.8E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
9.1E+00
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
2.9E+00
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.9E+01
4.8E+00
6.5E+00
1.6E-01
3.2E+00
6.8E-02
1.6E-01
9.5E+00
3.5E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E-01
1.1E+01
3. 7E-02
1.1E+00
1. 7E-01
8.6E+01
4.4E+00
4.1E+00
1.2E-01
3.4E+00
9.1E-02
1. 7E-01
8.2E+00
4.3E-01
7. 7E-03
2.6E-01
1.1E+01
3.6E-02
1.1E+00
3.8E-01
8.9E+01
5.8E+00
6.6E+00
1.4E-01
3.6E+00
8.8E-02
2.4E-01
1.1E+01
4. 7E-01
1.5E-02
2.6E-01
1.1E+01
5.0E-02
1.3E+00
3.5E-01
3.6E+02
7. 7E-01
3.4E-01
4.5E-01
NC
3.3E-01
3.0E-02
5.2E-01
3.8E-01
4.9E-03
3.0E-01
5. 7E-02
4.8E-01
5.0E+00
1.1E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-ll
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.5E+00
2.7E-01
2.1E-01
6.4E-03
7.6E-02
4.7E-03
2.2E-02
8.8E-01
2.5E-02
1.3E-03
1.4E-02
1.9E-02
4.5E-03
7.4E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE+01
1.3E-01
9.4E-02
5.6E-03
5.3E-02
8.3E-03
6.8E-03
3.1E-01
2.2E-02
4.7E-04
1.8E-02
9.4E-03
3.1E-03
1.3E-01
1.3E-02
4.3E+00
4.1E-01
4.1E-01
4.7E-03
5.6E-02
4.2E-03
1.8E-02
1.1E+00
2.0E-02
1.6E-03
1.3E-02
3.9E-02
3.6E-03
7.5E-02
2.3E-02
4.5E+00
l.OE+00
1.1E+00
1.6E-02
7.0E-02
4.8E-03
2.2E-02
1.5E+00
3.0E-02
2.7E-03
1.5E-02
8.1E-02
9.4E-03
7.1E-02
2.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.1E+00
7. 7E-01
6.1E-01
6.6E-03
1.1E+00
4.8E-03
2.2E-02
1.3E+00
2.6E-02
9.3E-03
1.5E-02
3.4E+00
4. 7E-03
7.6E-02
2.6E-02
1.3E+01
6.4E-01
4.9E-01
5.9E-03
1.1E+00
8.4E-03
6.9E-03
7.4E-01
2.3E-02
8.5E-03
1.9E-02
3.4E+00
3.3E-03
1.3E-01
1.3E-02
6.9E+00
9.2E-01
8.0E-01
5.0E-03
1.1E+00
4.3E-03
1.9E-02
1.5E+00
2.0E-02
9.6E-03
1.4E-02
3.4E+00
3.8E-03
7. 7E-02
2.3E-02
7.0E+00
1.5E+00
1.5E+00
1.6E-02
1.1E+00
4.9E-03
2.3E-02
1.9E+00
3.1E-02
1.1E-02
1.6E-02
3.5E+00
9.6E-03
7.3E-02
2.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-ll
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
5.0E+00
6.4E-01
5.5E-01
9.3E-03
9.4E-02
5.4E-03
3.4E-02
1.5E+00
5.0E-02
5.4E-03
1.5E-02
6.4E-02
9.6E-03
8.9E-02
1.1E-01
4.3E+00
3.5E-01
2.2E-01
4.9E-03
6.1E-02
4.2E-03
1.6E-02
9.9E-01
1.8E-02
1.1E-03
1.3E-02
4.5E-02
3.4E-03
6.9E-02
1.4E-02
3.6E+00
2.3E-01
2.4E-01
5.4E-03
5.3E-02
4.5E-03
8.0E-02
6.8E-01
3.4E-02
7.8E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-02
5.4E-03
5.1E-02
6.7E-02
3.1E+00
4.2E-02
l.OE-01
4.7E-03
7.3E-03
3.5E-03
5.5E-03
1.4E-01
2.3E-02
1.2E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-03
1.6E-03
5.0E-02
7.7E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.6E+00
1.1E+00
9.5E-01
9.5E-03
1.1E+00
5.5E-03
3.4E-02
1.9E+00
5.0E-02
1.3E-02
1.5E-02
3.5E+00
9.8E-03
9.1E-02
1.1E-01
6.9E+00
8.6E-01
6.2E-01
5.1E-03
1.1E+00
4.3E-03
1.6E-02
1.4E+00
1.9E-02
9.1E-03
1.3E-02
3.4E+00
3.6E-03
7.1E-02
1.4E-02
6.2E+00
7.4E-01
6.3E-01
5. 7E-03
1.1E+00
4.6E-03
8.0E-02
1.1E+00
3.5E-02
8.8E-03
1. 7E-02
3.4E+00
5. 7E-03
5.3E-02
6.8E-02
5.6E+00
5.5E-01
5.0E-01
5.0E-03
l.OE+00
3.6E-03
5.6E-03
5. 7E-01
2.4E-02
8.2E-03
1.1E-02
3.4E+00
1.9E-03
5.2E-02
8.1E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table C-ll
HQ TYPE C: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.0E+00
1.3E-01
2.2E-01
7.0E-03
1.1E-02
3.0E-03
6.9E-03
3.4E-01
1.5E-02
3.5E-04
8.3E-03
7.1E-03
1.6E-03
4.6E-02
7.5E-03
3.3E+00
1.1E-01
1.2E-01
5.2E-03
2.0E-02
4.0E-03
7.6E-03
2.9E-01
1.9E-02
3.4E-04
1.1E-02
6.7E-03
1.6E-03
4.8E-02
1.7E-02
3.5E+00
1.7E-01
2.3E-01
6.1E-03
3.0E-02
3.8E-03
1.1E-02
4.1E-01
2.0E-02
6.7E-04
1.1E-02
1.2E-02
2.2E-03
5.5E-02
1.5E-02
1.6E+01
3.4E-02
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
1.4E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
1.7E-02
2.2E-04
1.3E-02
2.5E-03
2.1E-02
2.2E-01
4.7E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.1E-01
9.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.7E-05
1.2E-04
9.4E-03
7.0E-04
1.6E-05
8.6E-04
2.5E-03
2.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-01
2.0E-01
6.3E-01
2.0E-01
8.0E-03
1.9E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.4E-01
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
2.3E-01
1.5E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.6E+00
6.4E-01
6.2E-01
7.3E-03
l.OE+00
3.1E-03
7.0E-03
7.8E-01
1.6E-02
8.4E-03
9.2E-03
3.4E+00
1.9E-03
4.8E-02
7.9E-03
5.9E+00
6.2E-01
5.2E-01
5.5E-03
1.1E+00
4.1E-03
7.8E-03
7.2E-01
1.9E-02
8.4E-03
1.2E-02
3.4E+00
1.8E-03
5.0E-02
1. 7E-02
6.0E+00
6.8E-01
6.2E-01
6.4E-03
1.1E+00
3.9E-03
1.1E-02
8.5E-01
2.1E-02
8. 7E-03
1.2E-02
3.4E+00
2.4E-03
5. 7E-02
1.6E-02
1.6E+01
3.4E-02
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
NC
1.4E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
1. 7E-02
2.2E-04
1.3E-02
2.5E-03
2.1E-02
2.2E-01
4. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type C.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-l
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Red-tailed Hawk
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
7.6E-02
7.0E-03
3.4E-03
1.2E-02
4.2E-03
2.4E-02
7.6E-01
1.4E-03
1.8E-03
9.7E-04
3.0E-03
1.3E-03
8.8E-03
1.7E-01
3.1E-03
3.0E-03
8.3E-03
7.3E-03
7.7E-03
2.7E-01
1.3E-03
6.7E-04
1.3E-03
1.5E-03
2.3E-03
4.5E-03
7.3E-02
1.4E-02
2.5E-03
8.8E-03
3.7E-03
2.1E-02
9.6E-01
1.1E-03
2.3E-03
9.0E-04
6.3E-03
1.3E-03
8.0E-03
7.5E-02
3.7E-02
8.3E-03
1.1E-02
4.3E-03
2.5E-02
1.3E+00
1.7E-03
3.9E-03
l.OE-03
1.3E-02
1.3E-03
9.0E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
8.1E-02
NC
7.2E-03
3.5E-03
1.2E-02
4.3E-03
2.5E-02
7. 7E-01
1.5E-03
1.9E-03
l.OE-03
3.5E-03
NC
1.3E-03
9.0E-03
1. 7E-01
NC
3.3E-03
3.1E-03
8.6E-03
7.4E-03
7.9E-03
2.8E-01
1.3E-03
7.0E-04
1.3E-03
2.0E-03
NC
2.3E-03
4. 7E-03
7. 7E-02
NC
1.4E-02
2. 7E-03
9.0E-03
3.8E-03
2.1E-02
9. 7E-01
1.2E-03
2.3E-03
9.8E-04
6.8E-03
NC
1.4E-03
8.2E-03
8.0E-02
NC
3.8E-02
8.5E-03
1.1E-02
4.4E-03
2.6E-02
1.3E+00
1.8E-03
3.9E-03
LIE-OS
1.3E-02
NC
1.3E-03
9.1E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-l
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Red-tailed Hawk
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
8.4E-02
1.8E-02
4.9E-03
1.5E-02
4.8E-03
3.9E-02
1.3E+00
2.8E-03
7.8E-03
l.OE-03
l.OE-02
1.6E-03
4.0E-02
7.2E-02
7.3E-03
2.6E-03
9.7E-03
3.7E-03
1.8E-02
8.6E-01
1.1E-03
1.6E-03
8.8E-04
7.2E-03
1.2E-03
4.8E-03
6.1E-02
7.9E-03
2.9E-03
8.3E-03
4.0E-03
9.0E-02
5.9E-01
2.0E-03
1.1E-03
1.1E-03
4.1E-03
9.0E-04
2.3E-02
5.1E-02
3.4E-03
2.5E-03
1.2E-03
3.1E-03
6.2E-03
1.2E-01
1.3E-03
1.7E-04
6.8E-04
4.6E-04
8.8E-04
2.7E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
8.9E-02
NC
1.8E-02
5.1E-03
1.5E-02
4.9E-03
3.9E-02
1.3E+00
2.9E-03
7.9E-03
1.1E-03
1.1E-02
NC
1.6E-03
4.0E-02
7. 7E-02
NC
7.4E-03
2. 7E-03
9.9E-03
3.8E-03
1.8E-02
8. 7E-01
LIE-OS
1.6E-03
9.6E-04
7. 7E-03
NC
1.3E-03
5.0E-03
6.5E-02
NC
8.0E-03
3.0E-03
8.6E-03
4.1E-03
9.0E-02
6.0E-01
2.0E-03
1.2E-03
1.2E-03
4.6E-03
NC
9.4E-04
2.4E-02
5.6E-02
NC
3.6E-03
2. 7E-03
1.4E-03
3.2E-03
6.3E-03
1.3E-01
1.4E-03
2.0E-04
7.5E-04
9.8E-04
NC
9.2E-04
2.9E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-l
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Red-tailed Hawk
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
5.1E-02
7.5E-03
3.7E-03
1.7E-03
2.6E-03
7.7E-03
3.0E-01
8.8E-04
5.0E-04
5.8E-04
1.1E-03
8.0E-04
2.6E-03
5.6E-02
3.9E-03
2.8E-03
3.2E-03
3.5E-03
8.6E-03
2.5E-01
1.1E-03
4.9E-04
8.0E-04
1.1E-03
8.4E-04
5.8E-03
5.8E-02
7.6E-03
3.2E-03
4.8E-03
3.4E-03
1.2E-02
3.6E-01
1.2E-03
9.6E-04
7.8E-04
1.9E-03
9.7E-04
5.3E-03
2.7E-01
5.0E-04
l.OE-02
1.3E-02
1.5E-03
2.0E-02
9.5E-04
3.1E-04
9.0E-04
4.0E-04
3.8E-03
1.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
l.OE-04
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.1E-05
7.8E-05
5.2E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.6E-02
NC
7.6E-03
3.9E-03
1.9E-03
2. 7E-03
7.9E-03
3.1E-01
9.4E-04
5.3E-04
6.6E-04
1. 7E-03
NC
8.5E-04
2.8E-03
6.1E-02
NC
4.1E-03
2.9E-03
3.4E-03
3.6E-03
8.8E-03
2.6E-01
1.1E-03
5.2E-04
8.8E-04
1.6E-03
NC
8.9E-04
6.0E-03
6.3E-02
NC
7. 7E-03
3.4E-03
5.0E-03
3.5E-03
1.2E-02
3. 7E-01
1.2E-03
9.9E-04
8.6E-04
2.4E-03
NC
l.OE-03
5.5E-03
2. 7E-01
NC
5.0E-04
l.OE-02
NC
1.3E-02
1.5E-03
2.0E-02
9.5E-04
3.1E-04
9.0E-04
4.0E-04
NC
3.8E-03
1.6E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-2
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mule Deer
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.5E-01
5.6E-02
4.4E-02
1.3E-03
1.6E-02
9.9E-04
4.5E-03
1.8E-01
5.2E-03
2.7E-04
2.9E-03
4.0E-03
9.4E-04
1.6E-02
5.3E-03
2.1E+00
2.8E-02
2.0E-02
1.2E-03
1.1E-02
1.7E-03
1.4E-03
6.5E-02
4.7E-03
9.8E-05
3.8E-03
2.0E-03
6.5E-04
2.7E-02
2.7E-03
9.1E-01
8.7E-02
8.5E-02
l.OE-03
1.2E-02
8.9E-04
3.9E-03
2.3E-01
4.1E-03
3.4E-04
2.7E-03
8.2E-03
7.6E-04
1.6E-02
4.8E-03
9.4E-01
2.2E-01
2.3E-01
3.3E-03
1.5E-02
l.OE-03
4.7E-03
3.2E-01
6.4E-03
5.6E-04
3.1E-03
1.7E-02
2.0E-03
1.5E-02
5.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
Plants
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.4E+00
1.4E-01
1.1E-01
1.4E-03
2.1E-01
l.OE-03
4.6E-03
2.5E-01
5.5E-03
2. 7E-03
3.2E-03
6.0E-01
l.OE-03
1.6E-02
5.5E-03
2.5E+00
1.1E-01
8.2E-02
1.3E-03
2.1E-01
1.8E-03
1.5E-03
1.3E-01
4.9E-03
2.6E-03
4.0E-03
6.0E-01
7.3E-04
2.8E-02
2.8E-03
1.3E+00
1. 7E-01
1.5E-01
1.1E-03
2.1E-01
9.2E-04
3.9E-03
3.0E-01
4.3E-03
2.8E-03
3.0E-03
6.1E-01
8.3E-04
1.6E-02
5.0E-03
1.3E+00
3.0E-01
3.0E-01
3.4E-03
2.1E-01
l.OE-03
4.8E-03
3.8E-01
6.6E-03
3.0E-03
3.4E-03
6.2E-01
2.0E-03
1.6E-02
5.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-2
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mule Deer
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.1E+00
1.3E-01
1.1E-01
1.9E-03
2.0E-02
1.1E-03
7.2E-03
3.1E-01
l.OE-02
1.1E-03
3.1E-03
1.3E-02
2.0E-03
1.9E-02
2.4E-02
9.1E-01
7.4E-02
4.5E-02
l.OE-03
1.3E-02
8.8E-04
3.4E-03
2.1E-01
3.9E-03
2.3E-04
2.6E-03
9.5E-03
7.1E-04
1.4E-02
2.9E-03
7.6E-01
4.8E-02
5.0E-02
1.1E-03
1.1E-02
9.5E-04
1.7E-02
1.4E-01
7.2E-03
1.6E-04
3.4E-03
5.3E-03
1.1E-03
1.1E-02
1.4E-02
6.5E-01
8.9E-03
2.1E-02
9.9E-04
1.5E-03
7.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.8E-02
4.9E-03
2.4E-05
2.0E-03
6.1E-04
3.4E-04
l.OE-02
1.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
Plants
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
2.2E-01
1.8E-01
2.0E-03
2.1E-01
1.2E-03
7.2E-03
3. 7E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
3.3E-03
6.1E-01
2.1E-03
1.9E-02
2.4E-02
1.3E+00
1.5E-01
1.1E-01
1.1E-03
2.1E-01
9.1E-04
3.4E-03
2. 7E-01
4.1E-03
2. 7E-03
2.9E-03
6.1E-01
7.9E-04
1.5E-02
3.0E-03
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
1.1E-01
1.2E-03
2.1E-01
9.8E-04
1. 7E-02
2.1E-01
7.4E-03
2.6E-03
3.6E-03
6.0E-01
1.2E-03
1.1E-02
1.4E-02
l.OE+00
8.9E-02
8.4E-02
LIE-OS
2.0E-01
7.6E-04
1.2E-03
9.2E-02
5.1E-03
2.5E-03
2.3E-03
6.0E-01
4.2E-04
1.1E-02
1. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-2
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mule Deer
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.4E-01
2.8E-02
4.7E-02
1.5E-03
2.2E-03
6.3E-04
1.4E-03
7.2E-02
3.2E-03
7.3E-05
1.7E-03
1.5E-03
3.4E-04
9.6E-03
1.6E-03
7.0E-01
2.4E-02
2.5E-02
1.1E-03
4.2E-03
8.3E-04
1.6E-03
6.0E-02
3.9E-03
7.1E-05
2.4E-03
1.4E-03
3.3E-04
l.OE-02
3.5E-03
7.3E-01
3.7E-02
4.7E-02
1.3E-03
6.4E-03
8.1E-04
2.2E-03
8.7E-02
4.3E-03
1.4E-04
2.4E-03
2.4E-03
4.6E-04
1.2E-02
3.2E-03
3.3E+00
7.1E-03
3.1E-03
4.2E-03
3.0E-03
2.7E-04
4.7E-03
3.5E-03
4.5E-05
2.7E-03
5.3E-04
4.4E-03
4.6E-02
9.8E-04
Sediment
Surface
Water
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
6.4E-02
2.8E-03
9.5E-04
7.6E-05
3.6E-04
2.6E-05
3.8E-05
2.9E-03
2.1E-04
5.0E-06
2.6E-04
7.5E-04
7.4E-05
6.0E-04
1.3E-04
Plants
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
3.3E-01
7.8E-02
6.1E-02
1.9E-01
6.1E-02
2.5E-03
6.0E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+OO
1.1E-01
1.1E-01
1.6E-03
2.0E-01
6.5E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-01
3.5E-03
2.5E-03
2.0E-03
6.0E-01
4.1E-04
l.OE-02
1. 7E-03
1.1E+00
l.OE-01
8. 7E-02
1.2E-03
2.0E-01
8.6E-04
1.6E-03
1.2E-01
4.1E-03
2.5E-03
2. 7E-03
6.0E-01
4.0E-04
1.1E-02
3.6E-03
1.1E+00
1.2E-01
1.1E-01
1.4E-03
2.0E-01
8.4E-04
2.3E-03
1.5E-01
4.5E-03
2.6E-03
2.6E-03
6.0E-01
5.3E-04
1.2E-02
3.3E-03
3.3E+00
7.1E-03
3.1E-03
4.2E-03
NC
3.0E-03
2. 7E-04
4. 7E-03
3.5E-03
4.5E-05
2. 7E-03
5.3E-04
4.4E-03
4.6E-02
9.8E-04
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
3.7E+00
2.2E-01
1.7E-01
5.2E-03
6.2E-02
3.9E-03
1.8E-02
7.2E-01
2.0E-02
l.OE-03
1.1E-02
1.6E-02
3.7E-03
6.1E-02
2.1E-02
8.3E+00
1.1E-01
7.7E-02
4.6E-03
4.3E-02
6.8E-03
5.6E-03
2.5E-01
1.8E-02
3.8E-04
1.5E-02
7.7E-03
2.5E-03
1.1E-01
1.1E-02
3.6E+00
3.4E-01
3.3E-01
3.9E-03
4.6E-02
3.5E-03
1.5E-02
9.1E-01
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
1.1E-02
3.2E-02
3.0E-03
6.2E-02
1.9E-02
3.7E+00
8.5E-01
9.2E-01
1.3E-02
5.7E-02
4.0E-03
1.8E-02
1.2E+00
2.5E-02
2.2E-03
1.2E-02
6.6E-02
7.7E-03
5.8E-02
2.1E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.0E+00
2.6E-01
2.0E-01
5.4E-03
1.4E-01
3.9E-03
1.8E-02
7.5E-01
2.1E-02
2.1E-03
1.2E-02
2. 7E-01
3.8E-03
6.2E-02
2.1E-02
8.6E+00
1.5E-01
l.OE-01
4. 7E-03
1.3E-01
6.9E-03
5. 7E-03
2.8E-01
1.9E-02
1.4E-03
1.5E-02
2.6E-01
2. 7E-03
1.1E-01
1.1E-02
3.8E+00
3.8E-01
3.6E-01
4.0E-03
1.3E-01
3.5E-03
1.5E-02
9.4E-01
1. 7E-02
2.4E-03
1.1E-02
2.8E-01
3.1E-03
6.3E-02
1.9E-02
3.9E+00
8.9E-01
9.4E-01
1.3E-02
1.4E-01
4.0E-03
1.9E-02
1.3E+00
2.5E-02
3.2E-03
1.3E-02
3.2E-01
7.8E-03
6.0E-02
2.1E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.1E+00
5.3E-01
4.5E-01
7.6E-03
7.7E-02
4.4E-03
2.8E-02
1.2E+00
4.1E-02
4.5E-03
1.2E-02
5.2E-02
7.9E-03
7.3E-02
9.4E-02
3.6E+00
2.9E-01
1.8E-01
4.0E-03
5.0E-02
3.4E-03
1.3E-02
8.1E-01
1.5E-02
9.1E-04
l.OE-02
3.7E-02
2.8E-03
5.7E-02
1.1E-02
3.0E+00
1.9E-01
1.9E-01
4.5E-03
4.3E-02
3.7E-03
6.5E-02
5.5E-01
2.8E-02
6.4E-04
1.3E-02
2.1E-02
4.5E-03
4.2E-02
5.5E-02
2.5E+00
3.5E-02
8.4E-02
3.9E-03
6.0E-03
2.9E-03
4.5E-03
1.1E-01
1.9E-02
9.5E-05
7.9E-03
2.4E-03
1.3E-03
4.1E-02
6.3E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.4E+00
5.6E-01
4.8E-01
7.8E-03
1.6E-01
4.5E-03
2.8E-02
1.2E+00
4.1E-02
5.5E-03
1.2E-02
3.0E-01
8.0E-03
7.4E-02
9.4E-02
3.8E+00
3.3E-01
2.0E-01
4.1E-03
1.3E-01
3.5E-03
1.3E-02
8.5E-01
1.6E-02
1.9E-03
1.1E-02
2.9E-01
2.9E-03
5.8E-02
1.2E-02
3.2E+00
2.3E-01
2.2E-01
4.6E-03
1.3E-01
3.8E-03
6.5E-02
5.9E-01
2.8E-02
1. 7E-03
1.4E-02
2. 7E-01
4.6E-03
4.3E-02
5.6E-02
2.8E+00
7.3E-02
1.1E-01
4.0E-03
8.8E-02
2.9E-03
4.6E-03
1.4E-01
2.0E-02
1.1E-03
8.4E-03
2.5E-01
1.5E-03
4.2E-02
6.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.5E+00
1.1E-01
1.8E-01
5.8E-03
8.6E-03
2.4E-03
5.6E-03
2.8E-01
1.3E-02
2.9E-04
6.8E-03
5.8E-03
1.3E-03
3.8E-02
6.2E-03
2.7E+00
9.3E-02
9.6E-02
4.3E-03
1.6E-02
3.3E-03
6.3E-03
2.3E-01
1.5E-02
2.8E-04
9.4E-03
5.5E-03
1.3E-03
3.9E-02
1.4E-02
2.8E+00
1.4E-01
1.8E-01
5.0E-03
2.5E-02
3.2E-03
8.7E-03
3.4E-01
1.7E-02
5.5E-04
9.2E-03
9.6E-03
1.8E-03
4.5E-02
1.2E-02
1.3E+01
2.8E-02
1.2E-02
1.6E-02
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
1.8E-02
1.4E-02
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
2.1E-03
1.7E-02
1.8E-01
3.8E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.8E+00
1.5E-01
2.1E-01
5.9E-03
9.1E-02
2.5E-03
5. 7E-03
3.1E-01
1.3E-02
1.3E-03
7.3E-03
2.6E-01
1.5E-03
3.9E-02
6.4E-03
3.0E+00
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
4.4E-03
9.8E-02
3.3E-03
6.3E-03
2. 7E-01
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
9.9E-03
2.6E-01
1.4E-03
4.1E-02
1.4E-02
3.1E+00
1.8E-01
2.1E-01
5.2E-03
1.1E-01
3.2E-03
8.8E-03
3. 7E-01
1. 7E-02
1.6E-03
9. 7E-03
2.6E-01
1.9E-03
4. 7E-02
1.3E-02
1.3E+01
2.8E-02
1.2E-02
1.6E-02
NC
1.2E-02
LIE-OS
1.8E-02
1.4E-02
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
2.1E-03
1. 7E-02
1.8E-01
3.8E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.3E+00
7.9E-02
6.2E-02
1.9E-03
2.2E-02
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
7.3E-03
3.7E-04
4.1E-03
5.6E-03
1.3E-03
2.2E-02
7.5E-03
3.0E+00
3.9E-02
2.8E-02
1.7E-03
1.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.0E-03
9.0E-02
6.6E-03
1.4E-04
5.3E-03
2.8E-03
9.1E-04
3.8E-02
3.8E-03
1.3E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E-01
1.4E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
5.4E-03
3.3E-01
5.8E-03
4.7E-04
3.8E-03
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
2.2E-02
6.8E-03
1.3E+00
3.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.6E-03
2.1E-02
1.4E-03
6.6E-03
4.4E-01
8.9E-03
7.9E-04
4.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.8E-03
2.1E-02
7.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
8.4E-02
6.4E-02
2.0E-03
2.3E-02
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
7. 7E-03
3.8E-04
4.6E-03
7.0E-03
1.5E-03
2.3E-02
7. 7E-03
3.1E+00
4.4E-02
2.9E-02
1.8E-03
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
2.1E-03
9.6E-02
7.0E-03
1.5E-04
5.8E-03
4.2E-03
LIE-OS
3.9E-02
4.0E-03
1.4E+00
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
1.5E-03
1. 7E-02
1.3E-03
5.5E-03
3.3E-01
6.2E-03
4.8E-04
4.3E-03
1.3E-02
1.2E-03
2.3E-02
7.0E-03
1.4E+00
3.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.8E-03
2.1E-02
1.5E-03
6. 7E-03
4.5E-01
9.3E-03
8.0E-04
4.9E-03
2.5E-02
2.9E-03
2.2E-02
7.8E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (b).xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.7E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.3E-01
1.5E-02
1.6E-03
4.3E-03
1.9E-02
2.8E-03
2.6E-02
3.4E-02
1.3E+00
l.OE-01
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
1.8E-02
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
2.9E-01
5.4E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-03
1.3E-02
l.OE-03
2.0E-02
4.1E-03
1.1E+00
6.8E-02
6.9E-02
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
2.3E-04
4.7E-03
7.5E-03
1.6E-03
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
9.1E-01
1.2E-02
3.0E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-03
l.OE-03
1.6E-03
4.0E-02
6.9E-03
3.4E-05
2.8E-03
8.5E-04
4.8E-04
1.5E-02
2.3E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.6E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.9E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.4E-01
1.5E-02
1.6E-03
4.8E-03
2.0E-02
3.0E-03
2. 7E-02
3.4E-02
1.4E+00
1.1E-01
6.6E-02
1.6E-03
1.9E-02
1.3E-03
4.8E-03
3.0E-01
5.8E-03
3.3E-04
4.2E-03
1.5E-02
LIE-OS
2.1E-02
4.3E-03
1.2E+00
7.3E-02
7.1E-02
1. 7E-03
1.6E-02
1.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
2.4E-04
5.2E-03
8.9E-03
1. 7E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E-02
l.OE+00
1.8E-02
3.2E-02
1.5E-03
2.8E-03
1.1E-03
1. 7E-03
4.5E-02
7.3E-03
4.4E-05
3.4E-03
2.3E-03
6.2E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (b).xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.0E-01
3.9E-02
6.5E-02
2.1E-03
3.1E-03
8.8E-04
2.0E-03
l.OE-01
4.5E-03
l.OE-04
2.4E-03
2.1E-03
4.7E-04
1.3E-02
2.2E-03
9.9E-01
3.3E-02
3.5E-02
1.5E-03
5.9E-03
1.2E-03
2.2E-03
8.4E-02
5.5E-03
9.9E-05
3.4E-03
2.0E-03
4.6E-04
1.4E-02
4.9E-03
l.OE+00
5.1E-02
6.6E-02
1.8E-03
8.9E-03
1.1E-03
3.1E-03
1.2E-01
6.0E-03
2.0E-04
3.3E-03
3.4E-03
6.4E-04
1.6E-02
4.5E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+00
4.4E-02
6. 7E-02
2.2E-03
3.8E-03
9.3E-04
2.1E-03
1.1E-01
5.0E-03
1.1E-04
2.9E-03
3.6E-03
6.2E-04
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.1E+00
3.9E-02
3.6E-02
1. 7E-03
6.6E-03
1.2E-03
2.3E-03
9.0E-02
5.9E-03
1.1E-04
3.9E-03
3.4E-03
6.0E-04
1.5E-02
5.2E-03
1.1E+00
5. 7E-02
6.8E-02
2.0E-03
9.6E-03
1.2E-03
3.2E-03
1.3E-01
6.4E-03
2.1E-04
3.8E-03
4.9E-03
7.9E-04
1. 7E-02
4. 7E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (b).xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.3E+00
7.9E-02
6.2E-02
1.9E-03
2.2E-02
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
7.3E-03
3.7E-04
4.1E-03
5.6E-03
1.3E-03
2.2E-02
7.5E-03
3.0E+00
3.9E-02
2.8E-02
1.7E-03
1.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.0E-03
9.0E-02
6.6E-03
1.4E-04
5.3E-03
2.8E-03
9.1E-04
3.8E-02
3.8E-03
1.3E+00
1.2E-01
1.2E-01
1.4E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
5.4E-03
3.3E-01
5.8E-03
4.7E-04
3.8E-03
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
2.2E-02
6.8E-03
1.3E+00
3.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.6E-03
2.1E-02
1.4E-03
6.6E-03
4.4E-01
8.9E-03
7.9E-04
4.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.8E-03
2.1E-02
7.6E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.6E+00
1.2E-01
8.9E-02
2.0E-03
l.OE-01
1.4E-03
6.4E-03
2.9E-01
7. 7E-03
1.4E-03
4.6E-03
2.6E-01
1.5E-03
2.3E-02
7. 7E-03
3.3E+00
7. 7E-02
5.5E-02
1.8E-03
9.8E-02
2.5E-03
2.1E-03
1.2E-01
7.0E-03
1.2E-03
5.8E-03
2.5E-01
1.1E-03
3.9E-02
4.0E-03
1.5E+00
1.6E-01
1.5E-01
1.5E-03
9.8E-02
1.3E-03
5.5E-03
3.6E-01
6.2E-03
1.5E-03
4.3E-03
2.6E-01
1.2E-03
2.3E-02
7.0E-03
1.6E+00
3.4E-01
3.6E-01
4.8E-03
l.OE-01
1.5E-03
6. 7E-03
4. 7E-01
9.3E-03
1.8E-03
4.9E-03
2. 7E-01
2.9E-03
2.2E-02
7.8E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (c).xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+00
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.7E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.3E-01
1.5E-02
1.6E-03
4.3E-03
1.9E-02
2.8E-03
2.6E-02
3.4E-02
1.3E+00
l.OE-01
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
1.8E-02
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
2.9E-01
5.4E-03
3.3E-04
3.7E-03
1.3E-02
l.OE-03
2.0E-02
4.1E-03
1.1E+00
6.8E-02
6.9E-02
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
2.3E-04
4.7E-03
7.5E-03
1.6E-03
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
9.1E-01
1.2E-02
3.0E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-03
l.OE-03
1.6E-03
4.0E-02
6.9E-03
3.4E-05
2.8E-03
8.5E-04
4.8E-04
1.5E-02
2.3E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.7E+00
2.3E-01
1.9E-01
2.9E-03
1.1E-01
1.6E-03
l.OE-02
4.6E-01
1.5E-02
2.6E-03
4.8E-03
2. 7E-01
3.0E-03
2. 7E-02
3.4E-02
1.5E+00
1.4E-01
9.1E-02
1.6E-03
l.OE-01
1.3E-03
4.8E-03
3.2E-01
5.8E-03
1.4E-03
4.2E-03
2.6E-01
1.1E-03
2.1E-02
4.3E-03
1.3E+00
1.1E-01
9. 7E-02
1. 7E-03
9.8E-02
1.4E-03
2.4E-02
2.3E-01
l.OE-02
1.3E-03
5.2E-03
2.6E-01
1. 7E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E-02
1.2E+00
5.0E-02
5.8E-02
1.5E-03
8.4E-02
1.1E-03
1. 7E-03
7.1E-02
7.3E-03
1.1E-03
3.4E-03
2.5E-01
6.2E-04
1.6E-02
2.5E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (c).xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Red Fox 1
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.0E-01
3.9E-02
6.5E-02
2.1E-03
3.1E-03
8.8E-04
2.0E-03
l.OE-01
4.5E-03
l.OE-04
2.4E-03
2.1E-03
4.7E-04
1.3E-02
2.2E-03
9.9E-01
3.3E-02
3.5E-02
1.5E-03
5.9E-03
1.2E-03
2.2E-03
8.4E-02
5.5E-03
9.9E-05
3.4E-03
2.0E-03
4.6E-04
1.4E-02
4.9E-03
l.OE+00
5.1E-02
6.6E-02
1.8E-03
8.9E-03
1.1E-03
3.1E-03
1.2E-01
6.0E-03
2.0E-04
3.3E-03
3.4E-03
6.4E-04
1.6E-02
4.5E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.2E-01
5.4E-03
1.8E-03
1.5E-04
6.9E-04
5.1E-05
7.3E-05
5.5E-03
4.1E-04
9.6E-06
5.1E-04
1.5E-03
1.4E-04
1.2E-03
2.4E-04
Plants
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.2E-02
2.6E-02
8.1E-02
2.5E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-01
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.2E+00
7. 7E-02
9.3E-02
2.2E-03
8.5E-02
9.3E-04
2.1E-03
1.3E-01
5.0E-03
LIE-OS
2.9E-03
2.5E-01
6.2E-04
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.2E+00
7.1E-02
6.2E-02
1. 7E-03
8.8E-02
1.2E-03
2.3E-03
1.2E-01
5.9E-03
LIE-OS
3.9E-03
2.5E-01
6.0E-04
1.5E-02
5.2E-03
1.3E+00
8.9E-02
9.4E-02
2.0E-03
9.1E-02
1.2E-03
3.2E-03
1.5E-01
6.4E-03
1.2E-03
3.8E-03
2.5E-01
7.9E-04
1. 7E-02
4. 7E-03
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (c).xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-4
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Cliff Swallow
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.3E+00
4.0E-01
1.9E-01
6.8E-01
2.4E-01
1.4E+00
4.3E+01
8.1E-02
l.OE-01
5.5E-02
1.7E-01
7.4E-02
5.0E-01
9.7E+00
1.8E-01
1.7E-01
4.7E-01
4.2E-01
4.4E-01
1.5E+01
7.3E-02
3.8E-02
7.2E-02
8.5E-02
1.3E-01
2.5E-01
4.1E+00
7.7E-01
1.4E-01
5.0E-01
2.1E-01
1.2E+00
5.5E+01
6.4E-02
1.3E-01
5.1E-02
3.6E-01
7.5E-02
4.5E-01
4.3E+00
2.1E+00
4.7E-01
6.2E-01
2.4E-01
1.4E+00
7.4E+01
9.9E-02
2.2E-01
5.9E-02
7.4E-01
7.1E-02
5.1E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
4.6E+00
NC
4.9E-01
1.9E-01
1.5E+00
2.4E-01
1.4E+00
4.6E+01
8.1E-02
l.OE-01
5.5E-02
3.3E+00
NC
7.4E-02
5.0E-01
l.OE+01
NC
2. 7E-01
1. 7E-01
1.3E+00
4.2E-01
4.4E-01
1.8E+01
7.3E-02
3.8E-02
7.2E-02
3.2E+00
NC
1.3E-01
2.5E-01
4.4E+00
NC
8.6E-01
1.4E-01
1.4E+00
2.1E-01
1.2E+00
5.7E+01
6.4E-02
1.3E-01
5.2E-02
3.5E+00
NC
7.5E-02
4.5E-01
4.6E+00
NC
2.2E+00
4. 7E-01
1.5E+00
2.4E-01
1.4E+00
7.7E+01
9.9E-02
2.2E-01
6.0E-02
3.8E+00
NC
7.1E-02
5.1E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-4
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Cliff Swallow
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.8E+00
l.OE+00
2.8E-01
8.4E-01
2.7E-01
2.2E+00
7.2E+01
1.6E-01
4.4E-01
5.8E-02
5.8E-01
8.9E-02
2.3E+00
4.1E+00
4.1E-01
1.5E-01
5.5E-01
2.1E-01
l.OE+00
4.9E+01
6.0E-02
9.0E-02
5.0E-02
4.1E-01
6.9E-02
2.7E-01
3.5E+00
4.5E-01
1.6E-01
4.7E-01
2.3E-01
5.1E+00
3.3E+01
1.1E-01
6.4E-02
6.4E-02
2.3E-01
5.1E-02
1.3E+00
2.9E+00
1.9E-01
1.4E-01
6.6E-02
1.8E-01
3.5E-01
6.7E+00
7.6E-02
9.5E-03
3.8E-02
2.6E-02
5.0E-02
1.5E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.1E+00
NC
1.1E+00
2.8E-01
1.7E+00
2. 7E-01
2.2E+00
7.5E+01
1.6E-01
4.4E-01
5.8E-02
3.7E+00
NC
8.9E-02
2.3E+00
4.4E+00
NC
5.0E-01
1.5E-01
1.4E+00
2.1E-01
l.OE+00
5.2E+01
6.0E-02
9.1E-02
5.0E-02
3.5E+00
NC
6.9E-02
2. 7E-01
3.8E+00
NC
5.4E-01
1.6E-01
1.3E+00
2.3E-01
5.1E+00
3.6E+01
1.1E-01
6.4E-02
6.4E-02
3.3E+00
NC
5.1E-02
1.3E+00
3.2E+00
NC
2.8E-01
1.4E-01
9.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.5E-01
9.4E+00
7.6E-02
9.6E-03
3.9E-02
3.1E+00
NC
5.0E-02
1.5E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-4
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Cliff Swallow
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.9E+00
4.2E-01
2.1E-01
9.4E-02
1.5E-01
4.4E-01
1.7E+01
5.0E-02
2.9E-02
3.3E-02
6.5E-02
4.6E-02
1.5E-01
3.2E+00
2.2E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E-01
2.0E-01
4.9E-01
1.4E+01
6.1E-02
2.8E-02
4.5E-02
6.1E-02
4.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.3E+00
4.3E-01
1.8E-01
2.7E-01
1.9E-01
6.8E-01
2.0E+01
6.7E-02
5.5E-02
4.5E-02
1.1E-01
5.5E-02
3.0E-01
1.5E+01
2.8E-02
6.0E-01
7.2E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
5.4E-02
1.8E-02
5.1E-02
2.3E-02
2.2E-01
9.2E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
1.7E-02
4.9E-04
6.2E-04
8.7E-04
3.6E-04
6.6E-04
3.8E-02
1.9E-04
1.1E-04
2.8E-04
1.9E-03
1.6E-04
6.7E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
2.8E-01
8.9E-02
8.6E-01
2.6E+00
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.2E+00
NC
5.1E-01
2.1E-01
9.5E-01
1.5E-01
4.4E-01
2.0E+01
5.0E-02
2.9E-02
3.3E-02
3.2E+00
NC
4.6E-02
1.5E-01
3.5E+00
NC
3.1E-01
1.6E-01
l.OE+00
2.0E-01
4.9E-01
1.7E+01
6.1E-02
2.8E-02
4.6E-02
3.2E+00
NC
4.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.6E+00
NC
5.2E-01
1.9E-01
1.1E+00
1.9E-01
6.8E-01
2.3E+01
6. 7E-02
5.5E-02
4.5E-02
3.2E+00
NC
5.5E-02
3.0E-01
1.5E+01
NC
2.8E-02
6.0E-01
NC
7.2E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
5.4E-02
1.8E-02
5.1E-02
2.3E-02
NC
2.2E-01
9.2E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-5
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mourning Dove
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.4E+00
1.3E-01
6.2E-02
2.2E-01
7.7E-02
4.5E-01
1.4E+01
2.6E-02
3.4E-02
1.8E-02
5.6E-02
2.4E-02
1.6E-01
3.1E+00
5.8E-02
5.4E-02
1.5E-01
1.3E-01
1.4E-01
4.9E+00
2.3E-02
1.2E-02
2.3E-02
2.7E-02
4.1E-02
8.2E-02
1.3E+00
2.5E-01
4.6E-02
1.6E-01
6.9E-02
3.8E-01
1.8E+01
2.1E-02
4.2E-02
1.7E-02
1.2E-01
2.4E-02
1.5E-01
1.4E+00
6.9E-01
1.5E-01
2.0E-01
7.8E-02
4.7E-01
2.4E+01
3.2E-02
7.1E-02
1.9E-02
2.4E-01
2.3E-02
1.6E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
Plants
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.5E+00
NC
1. 7E-01
6.2E-02
7.9E-01
7. 7E-02
4.5E-01
1.5E+01
2.6E-02
2.0E-01
1.8E-02
1.8E+00
NC
2.4E-02
1.6E-01
3.2E+00
NC
9.6E-02
5.5E-02
7.2E-01
1.3E-01
1.4E-01
5.9E+00
2.4E-02
1.8E-01
2.3E-02
1.8E+00
NC
4.2E-02
8.2E-02
1.4E+00
NC
2.9E-01
4.6E-02
7.3E-01
6.9E-02
3.8E-01
1.9E+01
2.1E-02
2.1E-01
1. 7E-02
1.9E+00
NC
2.4E-02
1.5E-01
1.5E+00
NC
7.3E-01
1.5E-01
7. 7E-01
7.9E-02
4. 7E-01
2.5E+01
3.2E-02
2.4E-01
1.9E-02
2.0E+00
NC
2.3E-02
1.6E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-5
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mourning Dove
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+00
3.4E-01
9.0E-02
2.7E-01
8.7E-02
7.1E-01
2.3E+01
5.2E-02
1.4E-01
1.9E-02
1.9E-01
2.9E-02
7.3E-01
1.3E+00
1.3E-01
4.7E-02
1.8E-01
6.8E-02
3.3E-01
1.6E+01
1.9E-02
2.9E-02
1.6E-02
1.3E-01
2.2E-02
8.8E-02
1.1E+00
1.5E-01
5.3E-02
1.5E-01
7.3E-02
1.6E+00
1.1E+01
3.6E-02
2.1E-02
2.1E-02
7.4E-02
1.7E-02
4.3E-01
9.4E-01
6.3E-02
4.6E-02
2.1E-02
5.7E-02
1.1E-01
2.2E+00
2.5E-02
3.1E-03
1.2E-02
8.5E-03
1.6E-02
4.9E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
Plants
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.7E+00
NC
3. 7E-01
9.0E-02
8.4E-01
8. 7E-02
7.1E-01
2.4E+01
5.2E-02
3.1E-01
1.9E-02
2.0E+00
NC
2.9E-02
7.3E-01
1.4E+00
NC
1. 7E-01
4.8E-02
7.5E-01
6.8E-02
3.3E-01
1.7E+01
1.9E-02
1.9E-01
1.6E-02
1.9E+00
NC
2.2E-02
8.8E-02
1.2E+00
NC
1.8E-01
5.3E-02
7.2E-01
7.3E-02
1.6E+00
1.2E+01
3.6E-02
1.9E-01
2.1E-02
1.9E+00
NC
1. 7E-02
4.3E-01
1.1E+00
NC
l.OE-01
4.6E-02
5.9E-01
5. 7E-02
1.1E-01
3.2E+00
2.5E-02
1. 7E-01
1.3E-02
1.8E+00
NC
1.6E-02
4.9E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-5
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mourning Dove
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.4E-01
1.4E-01
6.8E-02
3.0E-02
4.8E-02
1.4E-01
5.4E+00
1.6E-02
9.2E-03
1.1E-02
2.1E-02
1.5E-02
4.8E-02
l.OE+00
7.2E-02
5.1E-02
5.8E-02
6.4E-02
1.6E-01
4.5E+00
2.0E-02
8.9E-03
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
1.6E-02
1.1E-01
1.1E+00
1.4E-01
6.0E-02
8.7E-02
6.2E-02
2.2E-01
6.6E+00
2.2E-02
1.8E-02
1.4E-02
3.4E-02
1.8E-02
9.7E-02
4.9E+00
9.1E-03
1.9E-01
2.3E-01
2.7E-02
3.6E-01
1.7E-02
5.7E-03
1.7E-02
7.4E-03
7.0E-02
3.0E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
9.7E-03
2.9E-04
3.6E-04
5.0E-04
2.1E-04
3.8E-04
2.2E-02
1.1E-04
6.4E-05
1.6E-04
1.1E-03
9.5E-05
3.9E-04
Plants
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-01
3.8E-02
5.7E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E-01
1.8E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+00
NC
1.8E-01
6.9E-02
6.0E-01
4.9E-02
1.4E-01
6.4E+00
1.6E-02
1. 7E-01
1.1E-02
1.8E+00
NC
1.5E-02
4.8E-02
1.1E+00
NC
1.1E-01
5.1E-02
6.3E-01
6.4E-02
1.6E-01
5.6E+00
2.0E-02
1. 7E-01
1.5E-02
1.8E+00
NC
1.6E-02
1.1E-01
1.2E+00
NC
1.8E-01
6.0E-02
6.6E-01
6.3E-02
2.2E-01
7.6E+00
2.2E-02
1.8E-01
1.5E-02
1.8E+00
NC
1.8E-02
9. 7E-02
4.9E+00
NC
9.1E-03
1.9E-01
NC
2.3E-01
2. 7E-02
3.6E-01
1. 7E-02
5. 7E-03
1. 7E-02
7.4E-03
NC
7.0E-02
3.0E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-6
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
9.0E+00
5.3E-01
4.2E-01
1.3E-02
1.5E-01
9.4E-03
4.3E-02
1.7E+00
5.0E-02
2.5E-03
2.8E-02
3.8E-02
8.9E-03
1.5E-01
5.0E-02
2.0E+01
2.6E-01
1.9E-01
1.1E-02
1.1E-01
1.7E-02
1.4E-02
6.1E-01
4.4E-02
9.3E-04
3.6E-02
1.9E-02
6.2E-03
2.6E-01
2.6E-02
8.6E+00
8.2E-01
8.1E-01
9.4E-03
1.1E-01
8.4E-03
3.7E-02
2.2E+00
3.9E-02
3.2E-03
2.6E-02
7.8E-02
7.2E-03
1.5E-01
4.6E-02
8.9E+00
2.1E+00
2.2E+00
3.1E-02
1.4E-01
9.6E-03
4.5E-02
3.0E+00
6.0E-02
5.3E-03
3.0E-02
1.6E-01
1.9E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.3E+01
1.3E+00
1.1E+00
1.3E-02
1.5E+00
9.5E-03
4.3E-02
2.5E+00
5.0E-02
2.5E-03
2.8E-02
4.8E+00
9.1E-03
1.5E-01
5.1E-02
2.4E+01
1.1E+00
8.4E-01
1.1E-02
1.4E+00
1. 7E-02
1.4E-02
1.4E+00
4.5E-02
9.5E-04
3. 7E-02
4.8E+00
6.4E-03
2.6E-01
2.6E-02
1.3E+01
1.6E+00
1.5E+00
9. 7E-03
1.4E+00
8.5E-03
3. 7E-02
3.0E+00
4.0E-02
3.2E-03
2. 7E-02
4.8E+00
7.4E-03
1.5E-01
4.6E-02
1.3E+01
2.9E+00
2.9E+00
3.1E-02
1.5E+00
9. 7E-03
4.5E-02
3.7E+00
6.1E-02
5.3E-03
3.0E-02
4.9E+00
1.9E-02
1.4E-01
5.2E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-6
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
l.OE+01
1.3E+00
1.1E+00
1.8E-02
1.9E-01
1.1E-02
6.8E-02
2.9E+00
9.9E-02
1.1E-02
2.9E-02
1.3E-01
1.9E-02
1.8E-01
2.3E-01
8.6E+00
7.0E-01
4.3E-01
9.7E-03
1.2E-01
8.3E-03
3.2E-02
2.0E+00
3.7E-02
2.2E-03
2.5E-02
9.0E-02
6.8E-03
1.4E-01
2.7E-02
7.2E+00
4.6E-01
4.7E-01
1.1E-02
1.1E-01
9.0E-03
1.6E-01
1.3E+00
6.8E-02
1.6E-03
3.2E-02
5.0E-02
1.1E-02
l.OE-01
1.3E-01
6.1E+00
8.4E-02
2.0E-01
9.4E-03
1.5E-02
7.0E-03
1.1E-02
2.7E-01
4.7E-02
2.3E-04
1.9E-02
5.7E-03
3.2E-03
9.9E-02
1.5E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.4E+01
2.1E+00
1.7E+00
1.9E-02
1.5E+00
1.1E-02
6.8E-02
3.7E+00
l.OE-01
1.1E-02
3.0E-02
4.9E+00
1.9E-02
1.8E-01
2.3E-01
1.3E+01
1.5E+00
1.1E+00
9.9E-03
1.5E+00
8.4E-03
3.2E-02
2.7E+00
3. 7E-02
2.2E-03
2.6E-02
4.9E+00
7.0E-03
1.4E-01
2.8E-02
1.2E+01
1.3E+00
1.1E+00
1.1E-02
1.4E+00
9.1E-03
1.6E-01
2.1E+00
6.9E-02
1.6E-03
3.3E-02
4.8E+00
1.1E-02
l.OE-01
1.3E-01
l.OE+01
8.9E-01
8.5E-01
9. 7E-03
1.3E+00
7.1E-03
1.1E-02
l.OE+00
4. 7E-02
2.5E-04
2.0E-02
4.8E+00
3.5E-03
l.OE-01
1.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-6
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Big Brown Bat
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.1E+00
2.6E-01
4.4E-01
1.4E-02
2.1E-02
5.9E-03
1.4E-02
6.8E-01
3.1E-02
6.9E-04
1.6E-02
1.4E-02
3.2E-03
9.1E-02
1.5E-02
6.7E+00
2.2E-01
2.3E-01
l.OE-02
4.0E-02
7.9E-03
1.5E-02
5.7E-01
3.7E-02
6.7E-04
2.3E-02
1.3E-02
3.1E-03
9.6E-02
3.3E-02
6.9E+00
3.5E-01
4.5E-01
1.2E-02
6.0E-02
7.7E-03
2.1E-02
8.2E-01
4.1E-02
1.3E-03
2.2E-02
2.3E-02
4.3E-03
1.1E-01
3.0E-02
3.2E+01
6.7E-02
2.9E-02
3.9E-02
2.8E-02
2.6E-03
4.5E-02
3.3E-02
4.3E-04
2.6E-02
5.0E-03
4.2E-02
4.3E-01
9.3E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
2.2E-01
9.4E-03
3.2E-03
2.5E-04
1.2E-03
8.9E-05
1.3E-04
9.6E-03
7.2E-04
1.7E-05
8.8E-04
2.5E-03
2.5E-04
2.0E-03
4.2E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
4.1E+00
8.0E-01
6.5E-01
1.3E+00
7.5E-01
4.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+01
1.1E+00
1.1E+00
1.4E-02
1.4E+00
6.0E-03
1.4E-02
1.4E+00
3.1E-02
7.1E-04
1. 7E-02
4.8E+00
3.4E-03
9.3E-02
1.5E-02
1.1E+01
l.OE+00
8.8E-01
1.1E-02
1.4E+00
8.0E-03
1.5E-02
1.3E+00
3.8E-02
6.9E-04
2.4E-02
4.8E+00
3.3E-03
9.8E-02
3.4E-02
1.1E+01
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
1.2E-02
1.4E+00
7. 7E-03
2.1E-02
1.6E+00
4.1E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
4.8E+00
4.6E-03
1.1E-01
3.1E-02
3.2E+01
6. 7E-02
2.9E-02
3.9E-02
NC
2.8E-02
2.6E-03
4.5E-02
3.3E-02
4.3E-04
2.6E-02
5.0E-03
4.2E-02
4.3E-01
9.3E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/10/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-7
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Mallard
Work Area
WAS
WA7
All Work Areas
Utah Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
Sediment
2.1E+00
3.2E-01
5.5E-02
1.8E-01
1.1E-01
4.2E-01
2.0E+01
2.1E-02
5.1E-02
2.3E-02
l.OE-01
2.7E-02
1.6E-01
5.9E-01
2.2E-02
2.2E-02
2.6E-02
3.6E-02
1.4E-01
1.8E+00
l.OE-02
7.3E-03
9.0E-03
3.2E-02
9.5E-03
5.3E-02
l.OE+00
9.2E-02
3.1E-02
6.7E-02
4.7E-02
2.0E-01
6.7E+00
1.3E-02
5.1E-02
1.2E-02
6.0E-02
1.5E-02
6.9E-02
3.6E+00
6.8E-03
1.4E-01
1.7E-01
2.0E-02
2.7E-01
1.3E-02
4.3E-03
1.2E-02
5.5E-03
5.2E-02
2.2E-02
Surface
Water
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
9.9E-05
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.0E-05
7.8E-05
5.1E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
9.9E-05
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.0E-05
7.8E-05
5.1E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
4.6E-03
1.4E-04
1.7E-04
2.4E-04
9.9E-05
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
5.2E-05
3.0E-05
7.8E-05
5.1E-04
4.5E-05
1.9E-04
Plants
Surface/ Aerial
Inverts
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.1E+00
NC
3.2E-01
5.5E-02
1.8E-01
1.1E-01
4.2E-01
2.0E+01
2.1E-02
5.1E-02
2.3E-02
l.OE-01
NC
2.7E-02
1.6E-01
5.9E-01
NC
2.2E-02
2.2E-02
2.7E-02
3.6E-02
1.4E-01
1.8E+00
1.1E-02
7.3E-03
9.1E-03
3.2E-02
NC
9.6E-03
5.3E-02
l.OE+00
NC
9.2E-02
3.1E-02
6.7E-02
4.7E-02
2.0E-01
6.7E+00
1.3E-02
5.1E-02
1.2E-02
6.1E-02
NC
1.5E-02
6.9E-02
3.6E+00
NC
6.8E-03
1.4E-01
NC
1.7E-01
2.0E-02
2.7E-01
1.3E-02
4.3E-03
1.2E-02
5.5E-03
NC
5.2E-02
2.2E-02
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-8
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Northern Flicker
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.6E+00
2.4E-01
1.2E-01
4.1E-01
1.4E-01
8.5E-01
2.6E+01
4.9E-02
6.4E-02
3.4E-02
l.OE-01
4.5E-02
3.1E-01
5.9E+00
1.1E-01
l.OE-01
2.9E-01
2.5E-01
2.7E-01
9.2E+00
4.4E-02
2.3E-02
4.4E-02
5.2E-02
7.8E-02
1.6E-01
2.5E+00
4.7E-01
8.7E-02
3.0E-01
1.3E-01
7.2E-01
3.3E+01
3.9E-02
8.0E-02
3.1E-02
2.2E-01
4.6E-02
2.8E-01
2.6E+00
1.3E+00
2.9E-01
3.8E-01
1.5E-01
8.8E-01
4.5E+01
6.0E-02
1.3E-01
3.6E-02
4.5E-01
4.3E-02
3.1E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
Plants
Surf ace/ Aerial
Inverts
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.9E+00
NC
3.4E-01
1.2E-01
1.3E+00
1.5E-01
8.5E-01
2.9E+01
5.0E-02
6.4E-02
3.4E-02
3.4E+00
NC
4.5E-02
3.1E-01
6.2E+00
NC
2.0E-01
l.OE-01
1.2E+00
2.5E-01
2. 7E-01
1.2E+01
4.4E-02
2.3E-02
4.4E-02
3.4E+00
NC
7.8E-02
1.6E-01
2.8E+00
NC
5. 7E-01
8. 7E-02
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
7.2E-01
3.6E+01
3.9E-02
8.0E-02
3.2E-02
3.5E+00
NC
4.6E-02
2.8E-01
2.9E+00
NC
1.4E+00
2.9E-01
1.3E+00
1.5E-01
8.8E-01
4.8E+01
6.0E-02
1.3E-01
3.6E-02
3.8E+00
NC
4.4E-02
3.1E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-8
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Northern Flicker
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.9E+00
6.4E-01
1.7E-01
5.1E-01
1.6E-01
1.3E+00
4.4E+01
9.9E-02
2.7E-01
3.5E-02
3.5E-01
5.4E-02
1.4E+00
2.5E+00
2.5E-01
8.9E-02
3.4E-01
1.3E-01
6.3E-01
3.0E+01
3.7E-02
5.5E-02
3.1E-02
2.5E-01
4.2E-02
1.7E-01
2.1E+00
2.7E-01
l.OE-01
2.9E-01
1.4E-01
3.1E+00
2.0E+01
6.8E-02
3.9E-02
3.9E-02
1.4E-01
3.1E-02
8.1E-01
1.8E+00
1.2E-01
8.7E-02
4.0E-02
1.1E-01
2.1E-01
4.1E+00
4.6E-02
5.8E-03
2.3E-02
1.6E-02
3.0E-02
9.2E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
3.2E+00
NC
7.3E-01
1. 7E-01
1.4E+00
1. 7E-01
1.3E+00
4.7E+01
9.9E-02
2. 7E-01
3.6E-02
3.7E+00
NC
5.5E-02
1.4E+00
2.8E+00
NC
3.5E-01
9.0E-02
1.3E+00
1.3E-01
6.3E-01
3.3E+01
3. 7E-02
5.5E-02
3.1E-02
3.6E+00
NC
4.2E-02
1. 7E-01
2.4E+00
NC
3. 7E-01
l.OE-01
1.2E+00
1.4E-01
3.1E+00
2.3E+01
6.8E-02
3.9E-02
3.9E-02
3.5E+00
NC
3.1E-02
8.1E-01
2.1E+00
NC
2.1E-01
8. 7E-02
9.5E-01
1.1E-01
2.1E-01
6.9E+00
4. 7E-02
5.8E-03
2.4E-02
3.3E+00
NC
3.1E-02
9.3E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-8
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR:
Northern Flicker
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.8E+00
2.6E-01
1.3E-01
5.7E-02
9.1E-02
2.7E-01
l.OE+01
3.1E-02
1.7E-02
2.0E-02
3.9E-02
2.8E-02
9.1E-02
1.9E+00
1.4E-01
9.6E-02
1.1E-01
1.2E-01
3.0E-01
8.6E+00
3.7E-02
1.7E-02
2.8E-02
3.7E-02
2.9E-02
2.0E-01
2.0E+00
2.6E-01
1.1E-01
1.7E-01
1.2E-01
4.2E-01
1.2E+01
4.1E-02
3.3E-02
2.7E-02
6.5E-02
3.4E-02
1.8E-01
9.2E+00
1.7E-02
3.6E-01
4.4E-01
5.1E-02
6.8E-01
3.3E-02
1.1E-02
3.1E-02
1.4E-02
1.3E-01
5.6E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
9.2E-03
2.7E-04
3.4E-04
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
3.6E-04
2.1E-02
l.OE-04
6.1E-05
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
9.0E-05
3.7E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
3.0E-01
9.5E-02
9.1E-01
2.8E+00
3.3E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.1E+00
NC
3.5E-01
1.3E-01
9. 7E-01
9.2E-02
2. 7E-01
1.3E+01
3.1E-02
1.8E-02
2.0E-02
3.4E+00
NC
2.8E-02
9.1E-02
2.3E+00
NC
2.3E-01
9. 7E-02
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
3.0E-01
1.1E+01
3. 7E-02
1. 7E-02
2.8E-02
3.4E+00
NC
2.9E-02
2.0E-01
2.3E+00
NC
3.6E-01
1.1E-01
1.1E+00
1.2E-01
4.2E-01
1.5E+01
4.1E-02
3.4E-02
2. 7E-02
3.4E+00
NC
3.4E-02
1.8E-01
9.2E+00
NC
1. 7E-02
3.6E-01
NC
4.4E-01
5.1E-02
6.8E-01
3.3E-02
1.1E-02
3.1E-02
1.4E-02
NC
1.3E-01
5.6E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-9
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.8E+00
7.3E-01
2.7E-01
1.3E+00
3.2E-01
2.8E+00
8.4E+01
1.1E-01
3.1E-01
7.6E-02
3.4E-01
l.OE-01
9.8E-01
4.7E+01
6.4E-01
2.6E-01
1.4E+01
1.2E+00
2.6E+00
2.6E+02
8.2E-02
3.8E-01
1.4E-01
3.9E+00
4.2E-01
3.8E+00
4.9E+00
1.4E+00
1.7E-01
9.3E-01
2.4E-01
2.2E+00
l.OE+02
7.8E-02
2.5E-01
5.8E-02
6.8E-01
8.6E-02
8.3E-01
5.9E+00
4.0E+00
7.7E-01
1.2E+00
3.0E-01
2.8E+00
1.4E+02
1.4E-01
3.7E-01
7.5E-02
1.2E+00
8.7E-02
9.5E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
Plants
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
7.7E+00
NC
1.1E+00
2. 7E-01
6.6E+00
3.2E-01
2.8E+00
9.5E+01
1.1E-01
l.OE+00
7.6E-02
1.7E+01
NC
1.1E-01
9.8E-01
4.8E+01
NC
l.OE+00
2.6E-01
1.9E+01
1.2E+00
2.6E+00
2.7E+02
8.2E-02
1.1E+00
1.4E-01
2.0E+01
NC
4.2E-01
3.8E+00
5.9E+00
NC
1.8E+00
1. 7E-01
6.2E+00
2.4E-01
2.2E+00
1.1E+02
7.9E-02
9.8E-01
5.9E-02
1.7E+01
NC
8.6E-02
8.3E-01
6.9E+00
NC
4.3E+00
7. 7E-01
6.5E+00
3.0E-01
2.8E+00
1.5E+02
1.4E-01
1.1E+00
7.5E-02
1.8E+01
NC
8. 7E-02
9.5E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-9
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
5.1E+00
1.9E+00
3.8E-01
1.7E+00
2.7E-01
4.2E+00
1.5E+02
2.7E-01
9.8E-01
7.0E-02
1.2E+00
9.9E-02
4.1E+00
6.7E+00
7.8E-01
2.3E-01
1.1E+00
3.2E-01
2.0E+00
9.8E+01
8.0E-02
1.7E-01
7.0E-02
7.7E-01
1.1E-01
5.1E-01
5.7E+00
8.7E-01
2.4E-01
1.2E+00
3.2E-01
1.1E+01
6.6E+01
1.8E-01
3.6E-01
l.OE-01
4.9E-01
7.3E-02
3.2E+00
4.9E+00
3.4E-01
2.4E-01
1.2E-01
2.6E-01
4.7E-01
1.3E+01
1.2E-01
1.6E-02
5.4E-02
3.5E-02
7.6E-02
2.8E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
Plants
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
6.1E+00
NC
2.3E+00
3.8E-01
6.9E+00
2. 7E-01
4.2E+00
1.7E+02
2. 7E-01
1.7E+00
7.0E-02
1.8E+01
NC
9.9E-02
4.1E+00
7.7E+00
NC
1.2E+00
2.3E-01
6.3E+00
3.2E-01
2.0E+00
1.1E+02
8.0E-02
9.1E-01
7.0E-02
1.7E+01
NC
1.1E-01
5.2E-01
6.7E+00
NC
1.2E+00
2.4E-01
6.5E+00
3.2E-01
1.1E+01
7.7E+01
1.8E-01
1.1E+00
l.OE-01
1.7E+01
NC
7.3E-02
3.2E+00
5.9E+00
NC
7.2E-01
2.4E-01
5.4E+00
2.6E-01
4. 7E-01
2.4E+01
1.2E-01
7.5E-01
5.4E-02
1.7E+01
NC
7. 7E-02
2.8E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-9
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | American Robin
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
4.9E+00
8.2E-01
3.9E-01
1.8E-01
2.2E-01
8.3E-01
3.3E+01
8.1E-02
5.2E-02
5.0E-02
1.2E-01
6.8E-02
2.6E-01
4.1E+00
3.8E-01
2.0E-01
3.1E-01
2.5E-01
8.3E-01
2.5E+01
7.9E-02
5.1E-02
5.8E-02
1.1E-01
5.7E-02
5.9E-01
4.8E+00
7.0E-01
2.6E-01
5.0E-01
2.5E-01
1.3E+00
3.8E+01
9.4E-02
9.9E-02
5.9E-02
2.0E-01
7.5E-02
5.3E-01
2.4E+01
4.5E-02
9.4E-01
1.1E+00
1.3E-01
1.1E+00
8.4E-02
8.8E-03
7.5E-02
3.5E-02
3.4E-01
7.7E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
1.8E-02
5.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.9E-04
5.3E-04
9.7E-04
3.1E-02
2.5E-04
9.8E-05
3.6E-04
2.8E-03
2.5E-04
8.9E-04
Plants
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
4.2E-01
1.8E-01
3.4E+00
4.7E+00
7.3E-01
9.1E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
2.7E-01
9.6E-02
9.3E-01
3.2E+00
3.8E+00
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
5.9E+00
NC
1.2E+00
3.9E-01
5.4E+00
2.2E-01
8.3E-01
4.4E+01
8.1E-02
7.9E-01
5.0E-02
1.7E+01
NC
6.8E-02
2.6E-01
5.1E+00
NC
7.5E-01
2.0E-01
5.6E+00
2.5E-01
8.3E-01
3.6E+01
7.9E-02
7.9E-01
5.8E-02
1.7E+01
NC
5.8E-02
5.9E-01
5.8E+00
NC
1.1E+00
2.6E-01
5.8E+00
2.6E-01
1.3E+00
4.9E+01
9.4E-02
8.3E-01
6.0E-02
1.7E+01
NC
7.5E-02
5.3E-01
2.4E+01
NC
4.5E-02
9.4E-01
NC
1.1E+00
1.3E-01
1.1E+00
8.4E-02
8.8E-03
7.5E-02
3.5E-02
NC
3.4E-01
7. 7E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-10
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
2.0E+02
1.5E+01
1.1E+01
2.5E-01
4.0E+00
1.8E-01
1.2E+00
4.7E+01
9.6E-01
1.1E-01
5.3E-01
l.OE+00
2.5E-01
2.9E+00
1.4E+00
1.4E+03
6.2E+01
9.3E+00
2.4E-01
4.3E+01
6.7E-01
1.1E+00
1.4E+02
6.9E-01
1.3E-01
9.6E-01
1.2E+01
3.5E+01
1.2E+01
5.3E+00
1.4E+02
2.3E+01
2.1E+01
1.5E-01
2.9E+00
1.3E-01
9.7E-01
5.8E+01
6.6E-01
8.3E-02
4.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.9E-01
2.4E+00
1.2E+00
1.7E+02
4.1E+01
5.7E+01
7.1E-01
3.7E+00
1.7E-01
1.2E+00
7.7E+01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
5.2E-01
3.6E+00
4.4E-01
2.4E+00
1.3E+00
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
2.1E+02
1.9E+01
1.3E+01
2.5E-01
9.8E+00
1.8E-01
1.2E+00
5.1E+01
9.6E-01
1.1E-01
5.3E-01
2.4E+01
2.5E-01
2.9E+00
1.4E+00
1.4E+03
6.7E+01
1.2E+01
2.4E-01
4.9E+01
6. 7E-01
1.1E+00
1.5E+02
7.0E-01
1.3E-01
9.6E-01
3.5E+01
3.5E+01
1.2E+01
5.3E+00
1.6E+02
2.7E+01
2.3E+01
1.5E-01
8.6E+00
1.3E-01
9. 7E-01
6.1E+01
6. 7E-01
8.3E-02
4.1E-01
2.5E+01
1.9E-01
2.4E+00
1.2E+00
1.9E+02
4.5E+01
6.0E+01
7.1E-01
9.4E+00
1. 7E-01
1.2E+00
8.1E+01
1.2E+00
1.3E-01
5.2E-01
2.6E+01
4.4E-01
2.4E+00
1.3E+00
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-10
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.5E+02
3.8E+01
2.8E+01
3.4E-01
5.1E+00
1.5E-01
1.8E+00
8.6E+01
2.3E+00
3.3E-01
4.8E-01
3.7E+00
5.5E-01
2.7E+00
5.7E+00
1.9E+02
1.9E+01
1.1E+01
2.1E-01
3.4E+00
1.7E-01
8.6E-01
5.5E+01
6.8E-01
5.9E-02
4.9E-01
2.3E+00
1.9E-01
2.9E+00
7.2E-01
1.7E+02
1.2E+01
1.3E+01
2.2E-01
3.7E+00
1.7E-01
4.6E+00
3.7E+01
1.5E+00
1.2E-01
7.2E-01
1.5E+00
3.0E-01
2.0E+00
4.4E+00
1.4E+02
2.3E+00
5.0E+00
2.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E-01
2.0E-01
7.1E+00
l.OE+00
5.5E-03
3.7E-01
1.1E-01
6.9E-02
2.1E+00
4.0E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.7E+02
4.3E+01
3.1E+01
3.5E-01
1.1E+01
1.5E-01
1.8E+00
9.0E+01
2.3E+00
3.3E-01
4.9E-01
2.6E+01
5.5E-01
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
2.1E+02
2.3E+01
1.4E+01
2.1E-01
9.1E+00
1. 7E-01
8.6E-01
5.8E+01
6.8E-01
5.9E-02
4.9E-01
2.5E+01
1.9E-01
2.9E+00
7.2E-01
1.8E+02
1.7E+01
1.5E+01
2.2E-01
9.4E+00
1. 7E-01
4.6E+00
4.0E+01
1.5E+00
1.2E-01
7.2E-01
2.4E+01
3.0E-01
2.0E+00
4.4E+00
1.6E+02
6.4E+00
7.7E+00
2.2E-01
6.1E+00
1.4E-01
2.0E-01
1.1E+01
l.OE+00
5.5E-03
3. 7E-01
2.3E+01
6.9E-02
2.1E+00
4.0E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-10
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Masked Shrew |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
1.4E+02
6.8E+00
1.2E+01
3.6E-01
5.5E-01
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.8E+01
6.9E-01
1.8E-02
3.5E-01
3.7E-01
7.1E-02
1.9E+00
3.7E-01
1.2E+02
5.7E+00
5.5E+00
1.8E-01
9.5E-01
1.4E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+01
6.7E-01
1.7E-02
4.0E-01
3.2E-01
6.6E-02
1.6E+00
8.2E-01
1.4E+02
9.0E+00
l.OE+01
2.4E-01
1.5E+00
1.4E-01
5.5E-01
2.1E+01
8.0E-01
3.3E-02
4.1E-01
6.0E-01
1.1E-01
2.1E+00
7.4E-01
6.8E+02
9.2E-01
6.5E-01
8.6E-01
5.9E-01
5.6E-02
6.4E-01
7.1E-01
3.0E-03
5.2E-01
1.1E-01
7.7E-01
9.4E+00
1.1E-01
Sediment
Surface
Water
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
6.6E-03
5.1E-04
1.4E-03
2.2E-04
3.2E-04
1.3E-02
1.6E-03
2.6E-05
1.9E-03
6.5E-03
5.9E-04
5.3E-03
9.6E-04
Plants
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
1.6E+01
4.1E+00
2.8E+00
5.7E+00
3.6E+00
2.3E+01
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.6E+02
1.1E+01
1.5E+01
3.6E-01
6.3E+00
1.2E-01
3.6E-01
2.2E+01
6.9E-01
1.8E-02
3.5E-01
2.3E+01
7.2E-02
1.9E+00
3. 7E-01
1.4E+02
9.9E+00
8.3E+00
1.9E-01
6.7E+00
1.4E-01
3.6E-01
1.8E+01
6. 7E-01
1. 7E-02
4.0E-01
2.3E+01
6. 7E-02
1.6E+00
8.2E-01
1.6E+02
1.3E+01
1.3E+01
2.4E-01
7.3E+00
1.4E-01
5.5E-01
2.5E+01
8.0E-01
3.3E-02
4.1E-01
2.3E+01
1.1E-01
2.1E+00
7.4E-01
6.8E+02
9.2E-01
6.5E-01
8.6E-01
NC
5.9E-01
5.6E-02
6.4E-01
7.1E-01
3.0E-03
5.2E-01
1.1E-01
7. 7E-01
9.4E+00
1.1E-01
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-ll
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse |
Work Area
WAI
WA2
WAS
WA4
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
8.6E+00
6.6E-01
4.6E-01
1.1E-02
1.8E-01
7.8E-03
5.2E-02
2.1E+00
4.2E-02
4.6E-03
2.3E-02
4.6E-02
1.1E-02
1.3E-01
6.0E-02
6.0E+01
2.7E+00
4.1E-01
l.OE-02
1.9E+00
2.9E-02
5.0E-02
6.3E+00
3.0E-02
5.6E-03
4.2E-02
5.1E-01
1.5E+00
5.1E-01
2.3E-01
6.3E+00
9.9E-01
9.0E-01
6.6E-03
1.2E-01
5.8E-03
4.2E-02
2.5E+00
2.9E-02
3.6E-03
1.8E-02
9.0E-02
8.5E-03
l.OE-01
5.1E-02
7.5E+00
1.8E+00
2.5E+00
3.1E-02
1.6E-01
7.3E-03
5.2E-02
3.4E+00
5.2E-02
5.5E-03
2.3E-02
1.6E-01
1.9E-02
l.OE-01
5.8E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
Plants
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.3E+01
1.8E+00
1.2E+00
1.1E-02
2.4E+00
8.0E-03
5.2E-02
2.9E+00
4.3E-02
1.8E-02
2.5E-02
7.0E+00
1.1E-02
1.3E-01
6.1E-02
6.4E+01
3.8E+00
1.2E+00
1.1E-02
4.1E+00
2.9E-02
5.0E-02
7.2E+00
3.2E-02
1.9E-02
4.4E-02
7.5E+00
1.5E+00
5.1E-01
2.3E-01
l.OE+01
2.1E+00
1.7E+00
7.1E-03
2.4E+00
6.0E-03
4.2E-02
3.4E+00
3.0E-02
1. 7E-02
1.9E-02
7.0E+00
9.0E-03
1.1E-01
5.2E-02
1.2E+01
2.9E+00
3.3E+00
3.2E-02
2.4E+00
7.5E-03
5.2E-02
4.3E+00
5.3E-02
1.9E-02
2.4E-02
7.1E+00
2.0E-02
1.1E-01
5.9E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-ll
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse |
Work Area
WA5
WA6
WA7
WAS/ WAI 1
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.5E+00
1.7E+00
1.2E+00
1.5E-02
2.2E-01
6.5E-03
8.0E-02
3.8E+00
l.OE-01
1.4E-02
2.1E-02
1.6E-01
2.4E-02
1.2E-01
2.5E-01
8.5E+00
8.3E-01
5.0E-01
9.1E-03
1.5E-01
7.6E-03
3.8E-02
2.4E+00
3.0E-02
2.6E-03
2.1E-02
l.OE-01
8.2E-03
1.3E-01
3.1E-02
7.2E+00
5.4E-01
5.5E-01
9.7E-03
1.6E-01
7.6E-03
2.0E-01
1.6E+00
6.8E-02
5.4E-03
3.2E-02
6.5E-02
1.3E-02
8.8E-02
1.9E-01
6.2E+00
l.OE-01
2.2E-01
9.7E-03
1.6E-02
6.2E-03
8.9E-03
3.1E-01
4.5E-02
2.4E-04
1.6E-02
4.6E-03
3.0E-03
9.3E-02
1.7E-02
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
Plants
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
1.1E+01
2.8E+00
2.0E+00
1.6E-02
2.5E+00
6. 7E-03
8.0E-02
4.7E+00
l.OE-01
2.8E-02
2.3E-02
7.1E+00
2.5E-02
1.2E-01
2.5E-01
1.3E+01
1.9E+00
1.2E+00
9.6E-03
2.4E+00
7.8E-03
3.8E-02
3.3E+00
3.1E-02
1.6E-02
2.3E-02
7.1E+00
8. 7E-03
1.3E-01
3.2E-02
1.1E+01
1.6E+00
1.3E+00
l.OE-02
2.4E+00
7.8E-03
2.0E-01
2.5E+00
6.9E-02
1.9E-02
3.3E-02
7.0E+00
1.4E-02
9.2E-02
1.9E-01
l.OE+01
1.2E+00
9. 7E-01
l.OE-02
2.3E+00
6.4E-03
9.2E-03
1.2E+00
4. 7E-02
1.4E-02
1.8E-02
7.0E+00
3.5E-03
9. 7E-02
1.8E-02
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page 2 of 3
-------
APPENDIX I: Table D-ll
HQ TYPE D: Detailed Calculations for Estimated Risks in Non-AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Ingestion Pathways
RECEPTOR: | Deer Mouse |
Work Area
WA9
WA10
All Work Areas
Utah
Background
COPC
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Non-AOC Hazard Quotient (HQ)
Soil
6.2E+00
3.0E-01
5.2E-01
1.6E-02
2.4E-02
5.3E-03
1.6E-02
8.0E-01
3.0E-02
7.7E-04
1.5E-02
1.6E-02
3.1E-03
8.2E-02
1.6E-02
5.2E+00
2.5E-01
2.4E-01
8.1E-03
4.1E-02
6.0E-03
1.6E-02
6.2E-01
2.9E-02
7.5E-04
1.8E-02
1.4E-02
2.9E-03
6.9E-02
3.6E-02
6.1E+00
3.9E-01
4.4E-01
1.1E-02
6.8E-02
6.1E-03
2.4E-02
9.3E-01
3.5E-02
1.5E-03
1.8E-02
2.6E-02
4.7E-03
9.1E-02
3.2E-02
3.0E+01
4.0E-02
2.8E-02
3.8E-02
2.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.8E-02
3.1E-02
1.3E-04
2.3E-02
4.6E-03
3.4E-02
4.1E-01
4.7E-03
Sediment
Surface
Water
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
3.5E-01
2.0E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-04
1.2E-03
1.9E-04
2.8E-04
1.2E-02
1.4E-03
2.2E-05
1.7E-03
5.6E-03
5.1E-04
4.6E-03
8.3E-04
Plants
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
1.7E+00
5.2E-01
3.6E-01
1.4E+00
3.7E-01
1.4E-02
3.8E+00
Surface/Aerial
Inverts
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
2.2E+00
5.7E-01
3.8E-01
7.9E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E+00
Soil Inverts/
Earthworms
Benthics
Small
Mammals
Total HQ =
ZHQ
l.OE+01
1.4E+00
1.3E+00
1.6E-02
2.3E+00
5.5E-03
1.6E-02
1.7E+00
3.1E-02
1.4E-02
1. 7E-02
7.0E+00
3.6E-03
8. 7E-02
1. 7E-02
9.4E+00
1.4E+00
9.9E-01
8.5E-03
2.3E+00
6.1E-03
1.6E-02
1.5E+00
3.1E-02
1.4E-02
1.9E-02
7.0E+00
3.4E-03
7.4E-02
3. 7E-02
l.OE+01
1.5E+00
1.2E+00
1.1E-02
2.3E+00
6.3E-03
2.4E-02
1.8E+00
3.6E-02
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
7.0E+00
5.2E-03
9.5E-02
3.3E-02
3.0E+01
4.0E-02
2.8E-02
3.8E-02
NC
2.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.8E-02
3.1E-02
1.3E-04
2.3E-02
4.6E-03
3.4E-02
4.1E-01
4. 7E-03
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-small HR.xls: HQ-NonAOC
11/18/2004
Page3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX J
Detailed Wildlife Risk Calculations for AOC Locations (HQ Types A, B, C, and D)
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the International Smelting & Refining Site
HQ Type A: Tables A-l to A-l 1 (one table per receptor)
HQ Type B: Tables B-l to B-ll (one table per receptor)
HQ Type C: Tables C-l to C-ll (one table per receptor)
HQ Type D: Tables D-l to D-l 1 (one table per receptor)
J_CoverPage.xls
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-l
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red-tailed Hawk
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-2
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mule Deer
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
9.2E-02
3.4E-02
l.OE-01
9.3E-04
6.6E-04
2.7E-04
1.2E-03
1.5E-01
2.5E-03
1.7E-05
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
8.6E-04
2.6E-03
2.1E-03
WA2
0.079%
1.4E-01
l.OE+00
8.5E-01
6.7E-04
4.0E-01
1.2E-03
3.1E-01
1.6E+00
2.7E-03
3.6E-04
6.8E-03
3.8E-01
2.1E-03
3.2E-03
5.2E-02
WA3
19%
2.5E-01
1.2E-01
1.6E-01
4.3E-04
1.4E-01
3.0E-04
2.7E-03
1.8E-01
1.5E-03
2.7E-03
8.2E-04
1.8E-02
9.4E-04
4.9E-03
3.5E-03
WA4
4.1%
1.6E-01
1.3E-01
2.4E-01
1.9E-03
1.7E-03
3.3E-04
1.4E-03
1.7E-01
7.8E-04
1.3E-04
4.5E-04
4.4E-03
1.1E-03
4.6E-03
1.9E-03
WAS
0.73%
6.8E-02
l.OE-01
8.1E-02
4.7E-04
9.3E-04
5.0E-05
1.6E-03
2.0E-01
1.2E-04
2.2E-04
2.7E-04
9.0E-03
3.0E-04
1.9E-03
1.8E-03
WA6
4.9%
2.0E-01
4.4E-02
5.3E-02
l.OE-03
3.1E-03
2.6E-04
2.3E-03
1.3E-01
2.5E-03
1.7E-04
6.8E-04
2.7E-03
6.7E-04
4.2E-03
2.3E-03
WA7
1.9%
1.6E-01
9.8E-03
1.4E-02
3.4E-04
1.6E-03
1.6E-04
l.OE-03
4.0E-02
7.5E-04
4.6E-05
3.3E-04
l.OE-03
1.2E-04
2.9E-03
1.8E-03
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.2E-01
9.8E-03
2.5E-02
3.7E-04
8.8E-04
1.9E-04
1.2E-03
3.9E-02
4.4E-03
1.5E-05
4.9E-04
7.2E-04
5.0E-04
2.7E-03
1.3E-03
WA9
0.46%
9.2E-02
1.9E-02
4.9E-02
8.8E-04
4.8E-04
1.8E-04
5.8E-04
6.2E-02
1.2E-03
1.1E-05
3.0E-04
7.9E-04
3.9E-04
2.1E-03
l.OE-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
1.8E-01
8.9E-02
1.3E-01
7.9E-04
5.9E-02
2.7E-04
5.5E-03
1.5E-01
2.1E-03
l.OE-03
6.8E-04
1.3E-02
7.9E-04
4.0E-03
3.0E-03
Utah
Bkg
9.8E-01
2.4E-03
8.6E-04
1.2E-03
NC
9.1E-04
8.3E-05
9.8E-04
l.OE-03
7.0E-06
8.4E-04
1.4E-04
1.3E-03
1.4E-02
2.0E-04
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-3
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
3.7E-03
2.6E-03
1.1E-03
4.6E-03
5.9E-01
l.OE-02
6.6E-05
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE-02
8.3E-03
WA2
0.079%
5.5E-01
4.1E+00
3.4E+00
2.7E-03
1.6E+00
4.7E-03
1.2E+00
6.4E+00
1.1E-02
1.4E-03
2.7E-02
1.5E+00
8.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.1E-01
WA3
19%
l.OE+00
4.6E-01
6.2E-01
1.7E-03
5.7E-01
1.2E-03
1.1E-02
7.1E-01
5.9E-03
1.1E-02
3.2E-03
7.2E-02
3.7E-03
1.9E-02
1.4E-02
WA4
4.1%
6.2E-01
5.3E-01
9.6E-01
7.5E-03
6.8E-03
1.3E-03
5.7E-03
6.8E-01
3.1E-03
5.1E-04
1.8E-03
1.8E-02
4.3E-03
1.8E-02
7.6E-03
WAS
0.73%
2.7E-01
4.1E-01
3.2E-01
1.9E-03
3.7E-03
2.0E-04
6.5E-03
8.1E-01
4.8E-04
8.7E-04
1.1E-03
3.6E-02
1.2E-03
7.6E-03
7.3E-03
WA6
4.9%
8.1E-01
1.8E-01
2.1E-01
4.1E-03
1.2E-02
l.OE-03
9.2E-03
5.1E-01
l.OE-02
6.7E-04
2.7E-03
1.1E-02
2.7E-03
1.7E-02
9.3E-03
WA7
1.9%
6.5E-01
3.9E-02
5.4E-02
1.3E-03
6.4E-03
6.5E-04
4.1E-03
1.6E-01
3.0E-03
1.8E-04
1.3E-03
4.0E-03
4.8E-04
1.1E-02
7.1E-03
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
4.8E-01
3.9E-02
l.OE-01
1.5E-03
3.5E-03
7.7E-04
4.8E-03
1.6E-01
1.8E-02
6.1E-05
2.0E-03
2.9E-03
2.0E-03
1.1E-02
5.2E-03
WA9
0.46%
3.7E-01
7.4E-02
1.9E-01
3.5E-03
1.9E-03
7.2E-04
2.3E-03
2.5E-01
4.9E-03
4.5E-05
1.2E-03
3.1E-03
1.6E-03
8.4E-03
4.0E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
7.3E-01
3.5E-01
5.0E-01
3.1E-03
2.3E-01
1.1E-03
2.2E-02
5.9E-01
8.4E-03
4.1E-03
2.7E-03
5.0E-02
3.2E-03
1.6E-02
1.2E-02
Utah
Bkg
3.9E+00
9.4E-03
3.4E-03
5.0E-03
NC
3.6E-03
3.3E-04
3.9E-03
4.1E-03
2.8E-05
3.3E-03
5.7E-04
5.2E-03
5.5E-02
7.9E-04
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-4
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Cliff Swallow
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
5.9E-01
NC
1.3E+00
1.9E-01
4.0E-02
9.0E-02
5.0E-01
4.9E+01
5.6E-02
9.2E-03
7.8E-03
7.3E-02
NC
1.7E-02
2.8E-01
WA2
0.079%
9.0E-01
NC
1.1E+01
1.4E-01
2.4E+01
4.0E-01
1.3E+02
5.4E+02
6.0E-02
2.0E-01
1.8E-01
2.3E+01
NC
2.1E-02
7.0E+00
WA3
19%
1.6E+00
NC
2.0E+00
8.7E-02
8.7E+00
l.OE-01
1.2E+00
5.9E+01
3.3E-02
1.5E+00
2.2E-02
1.1E+00
NC
3.3E-02
4.6E-01
WA4
4.1%
l.OE+00
NC
3.1E+00
3.8E-01
l.OE-01
1.1E-01
6.2E-01
5.7E+01
1.7E-02
7.1E-02
1.2E-02
2.7E-01
NC
3.1E-02
2.6E-01
WAS
0.73%
4.3E-01
NC
l.OE+00
9.6E-02
5.6E-02
1.7E-02
7.1E-01
6.8E+01
2.7E-03
1.2E-01
7.2E-03
5.5E-01
NC
1.3E-02
2.5E-01
WA6
4.9%
1.3E+00
NC
6.8E-01
2.1E-01
1.9E-01
8.9E-02
l.OE+00
4.3E+01
5.5E-02
9.3E-02
1.8E-02
1.6E-01
NC
2.8E-02
3.1E-01
WA7
1.9%
1.1E+00
NC
1.8E-01
6.9E-02
9.7E-02
5.5E-02
4.5E-01
1.3E+01
1.7E-02
2.5E-02
8.8E-03
6.1E-02
NC
1.9E-02
2.4E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
7.8E-01
NC
3.3E-01
7.5E-02
5.3E-02
6.6E-02
5.2E-01
1.3E+01
9.7E-02
8.5E-03
1.3E-02
4.4E-02
NC
1.8E-02
1.7E-01
WA9
0.46%
5.9E-01
NC
6.2E-01
1.8E-01
2.9E-02
6.2E-02
2.5E-01
2.1E+01
2.7E-02
6.2E-03
8.0E-03
4.8E-02
NC
1.4E-02
1.3E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
1.2E+00
NC
1.6E+00
1.6E-01
3.5E+00
9.3E-02
2.4E+00
5.0E+01
4.6E-02
5.7E-01
1.8E-02
7.7E-01
NC
2.7E-02
3.9E-01
Utah
Bkg
6.3E+00
NC
1.1E-02
2.5E-01
NC
3.1E-01
3.6E-02
3.3E-01
2.3E-02
3.9E-03
2.2E-02
8.8E-03
NC
9.3E-02
2.7E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-5
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.9E-01
NC
4.1E-01
6.1E-02
1.3E-02
2.9E-02
1.6E-01
1.6E+01
1.8E-02
3.0E-03
2.5E-03
2.3E-02
NC
5.5E-03
9.0E-02
WA2
0.079%
2.9E-01
NC
3.5E+00
4.4E-02
7.8E+00
1.3E-01
4.3E+01
1.7E+02
1.9E-02
6.4E-02
5.9E-02
7.6E+00
NC
6.9E-03
2.3E+00
WA3
19%
5.2E-01
NC
6.4E-01
2.8E-02
2.8E+00
3.3E-02
3.8E-01
1.9E+01
1.1E-02
4.8E-01
7.1E-03
3.6E-01
NC
1.1E-02
1.5E-01
WA4
4.1%
3.2E-01
NC
l.OE+00
1.2E-01
3.3E-02
3.6E-02
2.0E-01
1.8E+01
5.6E-03
2.3E-02
3.9E-03
8.7E-02
NC
l.OE-02
8.2E-02
WAS
0.73%
1.4E-01
NC
3.4E-01
3.1E-02
1.8E-02
5.5E-03
2.3E-01
2.2E+01
8.7E-04
3.9E-02
2.3E-03
1.8E-01
NC
4.2E-03
7.9E-02
WA6
4.9%
4.2E-01
NC
2.2E-01
6.8E-02
6.0E-02
2.9E-02
3.2E-01
1.4E+01
1.8E-02
3.0E-02
5.9E-03
5.3E-02
NC
9.0E-03
l.OE-01
WA7
1.9%
3.4E-01
NC
5.7E-02
2.2E-02
3.1E-02
1.8E-02
1.4E-01
4.3E+00
5.3E-03
8.2E-03
2.8E-03
2.0E-02
NC
6.3E-03
7.7E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
2.5E-01
NC
1.1E-01
2.4E-02
1.7E-02
2.1E-02
1.7E-01
4.2E+00
3.1E-02
2.7E-03
4.3E-03
1.4E-02
NC
5.8E-03
5.6E-02
WA9
0.46%
1.9E-01
NC
2.0E-01
5.7E-02
9.3E-03
2.0E-02
8.0E-02
6.6E+00
8.7E-03
2.0E-03
2.6E-03
1.6E-02
NC
4.6E-03
4.3E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
3.8E-01
NC
5.3E-01
5.1E-02
1.1E+00
3.0E-02
7.7E-01
1.6E+01
1.5E-02
1.9E-01
5.9E-03
2.5E-01
NC
8.7E-03
1.3E-01
Utah
Bkg
2.0E+00
NC
3.6E-03
8.2E-02
NC
l.OE-01
1.2E-02
1.1E-01
7.4E-03
1.3E-03
7.3E-03
2.8E-03
NC
3.0E-02
8.6E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-6
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-7
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mallard
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
1.1E+00
NC
2.0E-03
4.5E-02
NC
5.5E-02
6.4E-03
5.8E-02
4.1E-03
6.9E-04
4.0E-03
1.6E-03
NC
1.7E-02
4.8E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-8
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
4.7E-01
NC
l.OE+00
1.5E-01
3.1E-02
7.2E-02
4.0E-01
3.9E+01
4.4E-02
7.3E-03
6.2E-03
5.8E-02
NC
1.4E-02
2.2E-01
WA2
0.079%
7.1E-01
NC
8.7E+00
1.1E-01
1.9E+01
3.2E-01
1.1E+02
4.3E+02
4.7E-02
1.6E-01
1.4E-01
1.9E+01
NC
1.7E-02
5.5E+00
WA3
19%
1.3E+00
NC
1.6E+00
6.9E-02
6.9E+00
8.0E-02
9.3E-01
4.7E+01
2.6E-02
1.2E+00
1.7E-02
8.8E-01
NC
2.6E-02
3.6E-01
WA4
4.1%
7.9E-01
NC
2.5E+00
3.0E-01
8.2E-02
8.8E-02
4.9E-01
4.5E+01
1.4E-02
5.6E-02
9.5E-03
2.1E-01
NC
2.5E-02
2.0E-01
WAS
0.73%
3.4E-01
NC
8.3E-01
7.6E-02
4.5E-02
1.3E-02
5.6E-01
5.4E+01
2.1E-03
9.6E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-01
NC
l.OE-02
2.0E-01
WA6
4.9%
l.OE+00
NC
5.4E-01
1.7E-01
1.5E-01
7.1E-02
8.0E-01
3.4E+01
4.4E-02
7.4E-02
1.4E-02
1.3E-01
NC
2.2E-02
2.5E-01
WA7
1.9%
8.4E-01
NC
1.4E-01
5.4E-02
7.7E-02
4.4E-02
3.5E-01
l.OE+01
1.3E-02
2.0E-02
7.0E-03
4.9E-02
NC
1.5E-02
1.9E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.2E-01
NC
2.6E-01
5.9E-02
4.2E-02
5.2E-02
4.1E-01
l.OE+01
7.7E-02
6.7E-03
l.OE-02
3.5E-02
NC
1.4E-02
1.4E-01
WA9
0.46%
4.7E-01
NC
5.0E-01
1.4E-01
2.3E-02
4.9E-02
2.0E-01
1.6E+01
2.1E-02
4.9E-03
6.3E-03
3.8E-02
NC
1.1E-02
1.1E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
9.4E-01
NC
1.3E+00
1.3E-01
2.8E+00
7.4E-02
1.9E+00
3.9E+01
3.7E-02
4.6E-01
1.5E-02
6.1E-01
NC
2.1E-02
3.1E-01
Utah
Bkg
5.0E+00
NC
8.7E-03
2.0E-01
NC
2.5E-01
2.8E-02
2.6E-01
1.8E-02
3.1E-03
1.8E-02
7.0E-03
NC
7.4E-02
2.1E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-9
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
American Robin
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
9.7E-01
NC
2.1E+00
3.1E-01
6.5E-02
1.5E-01
8.3E-01
8.1E+01
9.2E-02
1.5E-02
1.3E-02
1.2E-01
NC
2.8E-02
4.6E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.5E+00
NC
1.8E+01
2.2E-01
4.0E+01
6.6E-01
2.2E+02
8.9E+02
9.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.0E-01
3.9E+01
NC
3.5E-02
1.2E+01
WA3
19%
2.7E+00
NC
3.3E+00
1.4E-01
1.4E+01
1.7E-01
1.9E+00
9.8E+01
5.4E-02
2.5E+00
3.6E-02
1.8E+00
NC
5.4E-02
7.6E-01
WA4
4.1%
1.6E+00
NC
5.1E+00
6.3E-01
1.7E-01
1.8E-01
l.OE+00
9.5E+01
2.8E-02
1.2E-01
2.0E-02
4.5E-01
NC
5.1E-02
4.2E-01
WAS
0.73%
7.2E-01
NC
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
9.3E-02
2.8E-02
1.2E+00
1.1E+02
4.4E-03
2.0E-01
1.2E-02
9.1E-01
NC
2.1E-02
4.1E-01
WA6
4.9%
2.2E+00
NC
1.1E+00
3.5E-01
3.1E-01
1.5E-01
1.7E+00
7.1E+01
9.2E-02
1.5E-01
3.0E-02
2.7E-01
NC
4.6E-02
5.1E-01
WA7
1.9%
1.7E+00
NC
2.9E-01
1.1E-01
1.6E-01
9.1E-02
7.4E-01
2.2E+01
2.7E-02
4.2E-02
1.5E-02
l.OE-01
NC
3.2E-02
3.9E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.3E+00
NC
5.4E-01
1.2E-01
8.8E-02
1.1E-01
8.6E-01
2.2E+01
1.6E-01
1.4E-02
2.2E-02
7.3E-02
NC
3.0E-02
2.9E-01
WA9
0.46%
9.8E-01
NC
l.OE+00
2.9E-01
4.8E-02
l.OE-01
4.1E-01
3.4E+01
4.5E-02
l.OE-02
1.3E-02
8.0E-02
NC
2.4E-02
2.2E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.0E+00
NC
2.7E+00
2.6E-01
5.8E+00
1.5E-01
4.0E+00
8.2E+01
7.7E-02
9.5E-01
3.0E-02
1.3E+00
NC
4.5E-02
6.5E-01
Utah
Bkg
l.OE+01
NC
1.8E-02
4.2E-01
NC
5.1E-01
5.9E-02
5.4E-01
3.8E-02
6.4E-03
3.7E-02
1.5E-02
NC
1.5E-01
4.4E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-10
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Masked Shrew
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.8E+01
l.OE+01
3.1E+01
2.9E-01
2.0E-01
8.2E-02
3.6E-01
4.5E+01
7.8E-01
5.2E-03
8.9E-02
3.7E-01
2.6E-01
7.9E-01
6.4E-01
WA2
0.079%
4.3E+01
3.2E+02
2.6E+02
2.1E-01
1.2E+02
3.6E-01
9.5E+01
5.0E+02
8.4E-01
1.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.2E+02
6.4E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E+01
WA3
19%
7.7E+01
3.6E+01
4.8E+01
1.3E-01
4.5E+01
9.2E-02
8.4E-01
5.5E+01
4.6E-01
8.3E-01
2.5E-01
5.6E+00
2.9E-01
1.5E+00
1.1E+00
WA4
4.1%
4.8E+01
4.1E+01
7.4E+01
5.8E-01
5.2E-01
l.OE-01
4.4E-01
5.3E+01
2.4E-01
3.9E-02
1.4E-01
1.4E+00
3.4E-01
1.4E+00
5.9E-01
WAS
0.73%
2.1E+01
3.2E+01
2.5E+01
1.5E-01
2.9E-01
1.5E-02
5.0E-01
6.3E+01
3.8E-02
6.7E-02
8.2E-02
2.8E+00
9.2E-02
5.9E-01
5.7E-01
WA6
4.9%
6.3E+01
1.4E+01
1.6E+01
3.2E-01
9.5E-01
8.1E-02
7.2E-01
4.0E+01
7.8E-01
5.2E-02
2.1E-01
8.3E-01
2.1E-01
1.3E+00
7.2E-01
WA7
1.9%
5.1E+01
3.0E+00
4.2E+00
l.OE-01
4.9E-01
5.0E-02
3.2E-01
1.2E+01
2.3E-01
1.4E-02
l.OE-01
3.1E-01
3.8E-02
8.9E-01
5.5E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
3.7E+01
3.0E+00
7.8E+00
1.1E-01
2.7E-01
6.0E-02
3.7E-01
1.2E+01
1.4E+00
4.7E-03
1.5E-01
2.2E-01
1.5E-01
8.3E-01
4.0E-01
WA9
0.46%
2.8E+01
5.8E+00
1.5E+01
2.7E-01
1.5E-01
5.6E-02
1.8E-01
1.9E+01
3.8E-01
3.5E-03
9.2E-02
2.4E-01
1.2E-01
6.6E-01
3.1E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
5.7E+01
2.7E+01
3.9E+01
2.4E-01
1.8E+01
8.5E-02
1.7E+00
4.6E+01
6.5E-01
3.2E-01
2.1E-01
3.9E+00
2.4E-01
1.2E+00
9.1E-01
Utah
Bkg
3.0E+02
7.3E-01
2.6E-01
3.9E-01
NC
2.8E-01
2.5E-02
3.0E-01
3.2E-01
2.2E-03
2.6E-01
4.4E-02
4.0E-01
4.2E+00
6.2E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table A-ll
HQ TYPE A: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Deer Mouse
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.2E+00
4.6E-01
1.3E+00
1.3E-02
8.8E-03
3.6E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E+00
3.4E-02
2.3E-04
3.9E-03
1.6E-02
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
2.8E-02
WA2
0.079%
1.9E+00
1.4E+01
1.1E+01
9.0E-03
5.4E+00
1.6E-02
4.1E+00
2.2E+01
3.7E-02
4.8E-03
9.2E-02
5.1E+00
2.8E-02
4.3E-02
7.1E-01
WA3
19%
3.4E+00
1.6E+00
2.1E+00
5.8E-03
2.0E+00
4.0E-03
3.7E-02
2.4E+00
2.0E-02
3.6E-02
1.1E-02
2.4E-01
1.3E-02
6.6E-02
4.7E-02
WA4
4.1%
2.1E+00
1.8E+00
3.3E+00
2.5E-02
2.3E-02
4.4E-03
1.9E-02
2.3E+00
1.1E-02
1.7E-03
6.0E-03
6.0E-02
1.5E-02
6.2E-02
2.6E-02
WAS
0.73%
9.1E-01
1.4E+00
1.1E+00
6.4E-03
1.3E-02
6.7E-04
2.2E-02
2.7E+00
1.6E-03
2.9E-03
3.6E-03
1.2E-01
4.0E-03
2.6E-02
2.5E-02
WA6
4.9%
2.7E+00
6.0E-01
7.2E-01
1.4E-02
4.2E-02
3.6E-03
3.1E-02
1.7E+00
3.4E-02
2.3E-03
9.1E-03
3.6E-02
9.1E-03
5.6E-02
3.1E-02
WA7
1.9%
2.2E+00
1.3E-01
1.8E-01
4.6E-03
2.2E-02
2.2E-03
1.4E-02
5.3E-01
l.OE-02
6.2E-04
4.4E-03
1.4E-02
1.6E-03
3.9E-02
2.4E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.6E+00
1.3E-01
3.4E-01
5.0E-03
1.2E-02
2.6E-03
1.6E-02
5.3E-01
6.0E-02
2.1E-04
6.6E-03
9.7E-03
6.7E-03
3.6E-02
1.8E-02
WA9
0.46%
1.2E+00
2.5E-01
6.5E-01
1.2E-02
6.4E-03
2.5E-03
7.8E-03
8.3E-01
1.7E-02
1.5E-04
4.0E-03
1.1E-02
5.3E-03
2.9E-02
1.4E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.5E+00
1.2E+00
1.7E+00
1.1E-02
7.9E-01
3.7E-03
7.5E-02
2.0E+00
2.9E-02
1.4E-02
9.2E-03
1.7E-01
1.1E-02
5.4E-02
4.0E-02
Utah
Bkg
1.3E+01
3.2E-02
1.2E-02
1.7E-02
NC
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
1.3E-02
1.4E-02
9.5E-05
1.1E-02
1.9E-03
1.8E-02
1.9E-01
2.7E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType A.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-l
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red-tailed Hawk
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.1E-02
NC
4.5E-02
6.6E-03
1.4E-03
3.2E-03
1.8E-02
1.7E+00
2.0E-03
3.3E-04
2.7E-04
2.6E-03
NC
6.0E-04
9.8E-03
WA2
0.079%
3.2E-02
NC
3.9E-01
4.8E-03
8.5E-01
1.4E-02
4.7E+00
1.9E+01
2.1E-03
6.9E-03
6.4E-03
8.2E-01
NC
7.5E-04
2.5E-01
WA3
19%
5.7E-02
NC
7.0E-02
3.1E-03
3.1E-01
3.6E-03
4.1E-02
2.1E+00
1.2E-03
5.2E-02
7.7E-04
3.9E-02
NC
1.2E-03
1.6E-02
WA4
4.1%
3.5E-02
NC
1.1E-01
1.3E-02
3.6E-03
3.9E-03
2.2E-02
2.0E+00
6.1E-04
2.5E-03
4.2E-04
9.5E-03
NC
1.1E-03
9.0E-03
WAS
0.73%
1.5E-02
NC
3.7E-02
3.4E-03
2.0E-03
6.0E-04
2.5E-02
2.4E+00
9.4E-05
4.3E-03
2.5E-04
1.9E-02
NC
4.6E-04
8.7E-03
WA6
4.9%
4.6E-02
NC
2.4E-02
7.4E-03
6.6E-03
3.1E-03
3.5E-02
1.5E+00
1.9E-03
3.3E-03
6.4E-04
5.8E-03
NC
9.9E-04
1.1E-02
WA7
1.9%
3.7E-02
NC
6.2E-03
2.4E-03
3.4E-03
1.9E-03
1.6E-02
4.6E-01
5.8E-04
8.9E-04
3.1E-04
2.2E-03
NC
6.8E-04
8.4E-03
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
2.7E-02
NC
1.2E-02
2.6E-03
1.9E-03
2.3E-03
1.8E-02
4.6E-01
3.4E-03
3.0E-04
4.6E-04
1.6E-03
NC
6.4E-04
6.1E-03
WA9
0.46%
2.1E-02
NC
2.2E-02
6.2E-03
l.OE-03
2.2E-03
8.7E-03
7.2E-01
9.5E-04
2.2E-04
2.8E-04
1.7E-03
NC
5.0E-04
4.7E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
4.2E-02
NC
5.7E-02
5.6E-03
1.2E-01
3.3E-03
8.4E-02
1.7E+00
1.6E-03
2.0E-02
6.5E-04
2.7E-02
NC
9.5E-04
1.4E-02
Utah
Bkg
2.2E-01
NC
3.9E-04
8.9E-03
NC
1.1E-02
1.3E-03
1.2E-02
8.1E-04
1.4E-04
7.9E-04
3.1E-04
NC
3.3E-03
9.4E-04
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-2
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mule Deer
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.6E-01
9.6E-02
2.8E-01
2.6E-03
1.9E-03
7.5E-04
3.3E-03
4.2E-01
7.2E-03
4.7E-05
8.2E-04
3.4E-03
2.4E-03
7.2E-03
5.9E-03
WA2
0.079%
4.0E-01
2.9E+00
2.4E+00
1.9E-03
1.1E+00
3.3E-03
8.7E-01
4.6E+00
7.7E-03
l.OE-03
1.9E-02
1.1E+00
5.9E-03
9.0E-03
1.5E-01
WA3
19%
7.1E-01
3.3E-01
4.4E-01
1.2E-03
4.1E-01
8.5E-04
7.7E-03
5.1E-01
4.2E-03
7.6E-03
2.3E-03
5.1E-02
2.7E-03
1.4E-02
9.8E-03
WA4
4.1%
4.4E-01
3.8E-01
6.8E-01
5.3E-03
4.8E-03
9.3E-04
4.1E-03
4.9E-01
2.2E-03
3.6E-04
1.3E-03
1.3E-02
3.1E-03
1.3E-02
5.4E-03
WAS
0.73%
1.9E-01
2.9E-01
2.3E-01
1.3E-03
2.6E-03
1.4E-04
4.6E-03
5.8E-01
3.5E-04
6.2E-04
7.6E-04
2.5E-02
8.5E-04
5.5E-03
5.2E-03
WA6
4.9%
5.7E-01
1.3E-01
1.5E-01
3.0E-03
8.8E-03
7.5E-04
6.6E-03
3.7E-01
7.2E-03
4.8E-04
1.9E-03
7.6E-03
1.9E-03
1.2E-02
6.6E-03
WA7
1.9%
4.7E-01
2.8E-02
3.9E-02
9.6E-04
4.5E-03
4.6E-04
2.9E-03
1.1E-01
2.1E-03
1.3E-04
9.3E-04
2.8E-03
3.5E-04
8.2E-03
5.1E-03
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
3.4E-01
2.8E-02
7.2E-02
l.OE-03
2.5E-03
5.5E-04
3.4E-03
1.1E-01
1.3E-02
4.4E-05
1.4E-03
2.0E-03
1.4E-03
7.6E-03
3.7E-03
WA9
0.46%
2.6E-01
5.3E-02
1.4E-01
2.5E-03
1.4E-03
5.2E-04
1.6E-03
1.8E-01
3.5E-03
3.2E-05
8.4E-04
2.2E-03
1.1E-03
6.0E-03
2.8E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
5.2E-01
2.5E-01
3.6E-01
2.2E-03
1.7E-01
7.8E-04
1.6E-02
4.2E-01
6.0E-03
2.9E-03
1.9E-03
3.6E-02
2.3E-03
1.1E-02
8.4E-03
Utah
Bkg
2.8E+00
6.7E-03
2.4E-03
3.5E-03
NC
2.6E-03
2.3E-04
2.8E-03
3.0E-03
2.0E-05
2.4E-03
4.1E-04
3.7E-03
3.9E-02
5.7E-04
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-3
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
l.OE+00
3.7E-01
1.1E+00
l.OE-02
7.2E-03
2.9E-03
1.3E-02
1.6E+00
2.8E-02
1.8E-04
3.2E-03
1.3E-02
9.5E-03
2.8E-02
2.3E-02
WA2
0.079%
1.5E+00
1.1E+01
9.4E+00
7.4E-03
4.4E+00
1.3E-02
3.4E+00
1.8E+01
3.0E-02
3.9E-03
7.5E-02
4.2E+00
2.3E-02
3.5E-02
5.8E-01
WA3
19%
2.8E+00
1.3E+00
1.7E+00
4.7E-03
1.6E+00
3.3E-03
3.0E-02
2.0E+00
1.6E-02
3.0E-02
9.0E-03
2.0E-01
l.OE-02
5.4E-02
3.8E-02
WA4
4.1%
1.7E+00
1.5E+00
2.7E+00
2.1E-02
1.9E-02
3.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.9E+00
8.7E-03
1.4E-03
4.9E-03
4.9E-02
1.2E-02
5.1E-02
2.1E-02
WAS
0.73%
7.5E-01
1.1E+00
9.0E-01
5.2E-03
l.OE-02
5.5E-04
1.8E-02
2.3E+00
1.4E-03
2.4E-03
3.0E-03
9.9E-02
3.3E-03
2.1E-02
2.0E-02
WA6
4.9%
2.2E+00
4.9E-01
5.9E-01
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
2.9E-03
2.6E-02
1.4E+00
2.8E-02
1.9E-03
7.5E-03
3.0E-02
7.4E-03
4.6E-02
2.6E-02
WA7
1.9%
1.8E+00
1.1E-01
1.5E-01
3.7E-03
1.8E-02
1.8E-03
1.1E-02
4.4E-01
8.3E-03
5.1E-04
3.6E-03
1.1E-02
1.3E-03
3.2E-02
2.0E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.3E+00
1.1E-01
2.8E-01
4.1E-03
9.7E-03
2.1E-03
1.3E-02
4.4E-01
4.9E-02
1.7E-04
5.4E-03
8.0E-03
5.5E-03
3.0E-02
1.4E-02
WA9
0.46%
l.OE+00
2.1E-01
5.4E-01
9.7E-03
5.3E-03
2.0E-03
6.4E-03
6.8E-01
1.4E-02
1.2E-04
3.3E-03
8.7E-03
4.3E-03
2.4E-02
1.1E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.0E+00
9.9E-01
1.4E+00
8.7E-03
6.5E-01
3.0E-03
6.1E-02
1.7E+00
2.3E-02
1.2E-02
7.6E-03
1.4E-01
8.8E-03
4.4E-02
3.3E-02
Utah
Bkg
1.1E+01
2.6E-02
9.5E-03
1.4E-02
NC
l.OE-02
9.1E-04
1.1E-02
1.2E-02
7.8E-05
9.3E-03
1.6E-03
1.4E-02
1.5E-01
2.2E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
3.7E-03
2.6E-03
1.1E-03
4.6E-03
5.9E-01
l.OE-02
6.6E-05
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE-02
8.3E-03
WA2
0.079%
5.5E-01
4.1E+00
3.4E+00
2.7E-03
1.6E+00
4.7E-03
1.2E+00
6.4E+00
1.1E-02
1.4E-03
2.7E-02
1.5E+00
8.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.1E-01
WA3
19%
1.1E+00
1.2E+00
1.3E+00
2.0E-03
1.5E+00
1.3E-03
2.1E-02
2.1E+00
7.5E-03
2.7E-02
3.6E-03
2.8E-01
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.5E-02
WA4
4.1%
9.2E-01
2.0E+00
4.2E+00
2.1E-02
1.8E-02
1.8E-03
l.OE-02
2.4E+00
4.9E-03
2.5E-03
2.8E-03
3.8E-02
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.8E-02
WAS
0.73%
2.7E-01
4.1E-01
3.2E-01
1.9E-03
3.7E-03
2.0E-04
6.5E-03
8.1E-01
4.8E-04
8.7E-04
1.1E-03
3.6E-02
1.2E-03
7.6E-03
7.3E-03
WA6
4.9%
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
3.2E-01
7.3E-03
4.3E-02
1.3E-03
1.7E-02
8.9E-01
2.3E-02
1.6E-03
3.4E-03
2.1E-02
8.2E-03
1.9E-02
1.8E-02
WA7
1.9%
9.8E-01
6.1E-02
7.6E-02
2.0E-03
1.3E-02
9.5E-04
4.3E-03
2.2E-01
5.6E-03
3.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.3E-03
5.7E-04
1.5E-02
1.4E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.1E-01
1.8E-01
1.9E-01
2.4E-03
1.4E-02
9.2E-04
1.3E-02
6.1E-01
3.7E-02
1.5E-04
2.5E-03
9.4E-03
4.6E-03
1.2E-02
1.3E-02
WA9
0.46%
5.2E-01
9.5E-02
2.5E-01
4.1E-03
3.6E-03
8.7E-04
2.5E-03
3.3E-01
8.6E-03
6.3E-05
1.5E-03
3.7E-03
2.1E-03
9.9E-03
5.9E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
8.4E-01
9.4E-01
7.6E-01
4.0E-03
5.7E-01
1.2E-03
4.6E-02
l.OE+00
1.2E-02
9.8E-03
3.2E-03
8.7E-02
4.8E-03
1.7E-02
1.7E-02
Utah
Bkg
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (b).xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
3.7E-03
2.6E-03
1.1E-03
4.6E-03
5.9E-01
l.OE-02
6.6E-05
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE-02
8.3E-03
WA2
0.079%
5.5E-01
4.1E+00
3.4E+00
2.7E-03
1.6E+00
4.7E-03
1.2E+00
6.4E+00
1.1E-02
1.4E-03
2.7E-02
1.5E+00
8.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.1E-01
WA3
19%
1.1E+00
1.2E+00
1.3E+00
2.0E-03
1.5E+00
1.3E-03
2.1E-02
2.1E+00
7.5E-03
2.7E-02
3.6E-03
2.8E-01
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.5E-02
WA4
4.1%
9.2E-01
2.0E+00
4.2E+00
2.1E-02
1.8E-02
1.8E-03
l.OE-02
2.4E+00
4.9E-03
2.5E-03
2.8E-03
3.8E-02
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.8E-02
WAS
0.73%
2.7E-01
4.1E-01
3.2E-01
1.9E-03
3.7E-03
2.0E-04
6.5E-03
8.1E-01
4.8E-04
8.7E-04
1.1E-03
3.6E-02
1.2E-03
7.6E-03
7.3E-03
WA6
4.9%
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
3.2E-01
7.3E-03
4.3E-02
1.3E-03
1.7E-02
8.9E-01
2.3E-02
1.6E-03
3.4E-03
2.1E-02
8.2E-03
1.9E-02
1.8E-02
WA7
1.9%
9.8E-01
6.1E-02
7.6E-02
2.0E-03
1.3E-02
9.5E-04
4.3E-03
2.2E-01
5.6E-03
3.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.3E-03
5.7E-04
1.5E-02
1.4E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.1E-01
1.8E-01
1.9E-01
2.4E-03
1.4E-02
9.2E-04
1.3E-02
6.1E-01
3.7E-02
1.5E-04
2.5E-03
9.4E-03
4.6E-03
1.2E-02
1.3E-02
WA9
0.46%
5.2E-01
9.5E-02
2.5E-01
4.1E-03
3.6E-03
8.7E-04
2.5E-03
3.3E-01
8.6E-03
6.3E-05
1.5E-03
3.7E-03
2.1E-03
9.9E-03
5.9E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
8.4E-01
9.4E-01
7.6E-01
4.0E-03
5.7E-01
1.2E-03
4.6E-02
l.OE+00
1.2E-02
9.8E-03
3.2E-03
8.7E-02
4.8E-03
1.7E-02
1.7E-02
Utah
Bkg
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-red fox (c).xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-4
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Cliff Swallow
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.2E+00
NC
2.6E+00
3.8E-01
7.9E-02
1.8E-01
l.OE+00
9.8E+01
1.1E-01
1.8E-02
1.6E-02
1.5E-01
NC
3.4E-02
5.6E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.8E+00
NC
2.2E+01
2.7E-01
4.8E+01
8.0E-01
2.7E+02
1.1E+03
1.2E-01
3.9E-01
3.6E-01
4.7E+01
NC
4.3E-02
1.4E+01
WA3
19%
3.2E+00
NC
4.0E+00
1.7E-01
1.7E+01
2.0E-01
2.3E+00
1.2E+02
6.5E-02
3.0E+00
4.4E-02
2.2E+00
NC
6.6E-02
9.2E-01
WA4
4.1%
2.0E+00
NC
6.2E+00
7.6E-01
2.1E-01
2.2E-01
1.2E+00
1.1E+02
3.4E-02
1.4E-01
2.4E-02
5.4E-01
NC
6.2E-02
5.1E-01
WAS
0.73%
8.7E-01
NC
2.1E+00
1.9E-01
1.1E-01
3.4E-02
1.4E+00
1.4E+02
5.4E-03
2.4E-01
1.4E-02
1.1E+00
NC
2.6E-02
4.9E-01
WA6
4.9%
2.6E+00
NC
1.4E+00
4.2E-01
3.7E-01
1.8E-01
2.0E+00
8.6E+01
1.1E-01
1.9E-01
3.6E-02
3.3E-01
NC
5.6E-02
6.2E-01
WA7
1.9%
2.1E+00
NC
3.5E-01
1.4E-01
1.9E-01
1.1E-01
8.9E-01
2.6E+01
3.3E-02
5.1E-02
1.8E-02
1.2E-01
NC
3.9E-02
4.7E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.6E+00
NC
6.5E-01
.5E-01
.1E-01
.3E-01
.OE+00
.6E+01
.9E-01
.7E-02
2.6E-02
8.8E-02
NC
3.6E-02
3.5E-01
WA9
0.46%
1.2E+00
NC
1.2E+00
3.5E-01
5.8E-02
1.2E-01
5.0E-01
4.1E+01
5.4E-02
1.2E-02
1.6E-02
9.7E-02
NC
2.9E-02
2.7E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.4E+00
NC
3.3E+00
3.2E-01
7.1E+00
1.9E-01
4.8E+00
9.9E+01
9.3E-02
1.1E+00
3.7E-02
1.5E+00
NC
5.4E-02
7.9E-01
Utah
Bkg
1.3E+01
NC
2.2E-02
5.1E-01
NC
6.2E-01
7.1E-02
6.5E-01
4.6E-02
7.8E-03
4.5E-02
1.8E-02
NC
1.9E-01
5.3E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-5
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.8E-01
NC
8.3E-01
1.2E-01
2.6E-02
5.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.2E+01
3.6E-02
6.0E-03
5.0E-03
4.7E-02
NC
1.1E-02
1.8E-01
WA2
0.079%
5.8E-01
NC
7.1E+00
8.8E-02
1.6E+01
2.6E-01
8.6E+01
3.5E+02
3.8E-02
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
1.5E+01
NC
1.4E-02
4.5E+00
WA3
19%
l.OE+00
NC
1.3E+00
5.6E-02
5.6E+00
6.5E-02
7.6E-01
3.8E+01
2.1E-02
9.6E-01
1.4E-02
7.2E-01
NC
2.1E-02
3.0E-01
WA4
4.1%
6.4E-01
NC
2.0E+00
2.5E-01
6.6E-02
7.1E-02
4.0E-01
3.7E+01
1.1E-02
4.6E-02
7.7E-03
1.7E-01
NC
2.0E-02
1.6E-01
WAS
0.73%
2.8E-01
NC
6.7E-01
6.2E-02
3.6E-02
1.1E-02
4.6E-01
4.4E+01
1.7E-03
7.8E-02
4.6E-03
3.6E-01
NC
8.4E-03
1.6E-01
WA6
4.9%
8.4E-01
NC
4.4E-01
1.4E-01
1.2E-01
5.8E-02
6.5E-01
2.8E+01
3.6E-02
6.0E-02
1.2E-02
1.1E-01
NC
1.8E-02
2.0E-01
WA7
1.9%
6.8E-01
NC
1.1E-01
4.4E-02
6.3E-02
3.6E-02
2.9E-01
8.5E+00
1.1E-02
1.6E-02
5.7E-03
4.0E-02
NC
1.3E-02
1.5E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
5.0E-01
NC
2.1E-01
4.8E-02
3.4E-02
4.2E-02
3.4E-01
8.5E+00
6.3E-02
5.5E-03
8.5E-03
2.9E-02
NC
1.2E-02
1.1E-01
WA9
0.46%
3.8E-01
NC
4.0E-01
1.1E-01
1.9E-02
4.0E-02
1.6E-01
1.3E+01
1.7E-02
4.0E-03
5.1E-03
3.1E-02
NC
9.2E-03
8.6E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
7.7E-01
NC
1.1E+00
l.OE-01
2.3E+00
6.0E-02
1.5E+00
3.2E+01
3.0E-02
3.7E-01
1.2E-02
5.0E-01
NC
1.7E-02
2.5E-01
Utah
Bkg
4.1E+00
NC
7.1E-03
1.6E-01
NC
2.0E-01
2.3E-02
2.1E-01
1.5E-02
2.5E-03
1.5E-02
5.7E-03
NC
6.0E-02
1.7E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-6
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.5E+00
9.1E-01
2.7E+00
2.5E-02
1.8E-02
7.1E-03
3.1E-02
4.0E+00
6.8E-02
4.5E-04
7.8E-03
3.2E-02
2.3E-02
6.8E-02
5.6E-02
WA2
0.079%
3.7E+00
2.8E+01
2.3E+01
1.8E-02
1.1E+01
3.2E-02
8.3E+00
4.4E+01
7.3E-02
9.6E-03
1.8E-01
l.OE+01
5.6E-02
8.5E-02
1.4E+00
WA3
19%
6.7E+00
3.1E+00
4.2E+00
1.1E-02
3.9E+00
8.0E-03
7.3E-02
4.8E+00
4.0E-02
7.2E-02
2.2E-02
4.9E-01
2.5E-02
1.3E-01
9.3E-02
WA4
4.1%
4.2E+00
3.6E+00
6.5E+00
5.0E-02
4.6E-02
8.8E-03
3.9E-02
4.6E+00
2.1E-02
3.4E-03
1.2E-02
1.2E-01
2.9E-02
1.2E-01
5.1E-02
WAS
0.73%
1.8E+00
2.8E+00
2.2E+00
1.3E-02
2.5E-02
1.3E-03
4.4E-02
5.5E+00
3.3E-03
5.9E-03
7.2E-03
2.4E-01
8.0E-03
5.2E-02
5.0E-02
WA6
4.9%
5.4E+00
1.2E+00
1.4E+00
2.8E-02
8.3E-02
7.1E-03
6.2E-02
3.5E+00
6.8E-02
4.5E-03
1.8E-02
7.2E-02
1.8E-02
1.1E-01
6.3E-02
WA7
1.9%
4.4E+00
2.6E-01
3.7E-01
9.1E-03
4.3E-02
4.4E-03
2.8E-02
1.1E+00
2.0E-02
1.2E-03
8.8E-03
2.7E-02
3.3E-03
7.7E-02
4.8E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
3.2E+00
2.6E-01
6.8E-01
9.9E-03
2.4E-02
5.2E-03
3.2E-02
1.1E+00
1.2E-01
4.1E-04
1.3E-02
1.9E-02
1.3E-02
7.2E-02
3.5E-02
WA9
0.46%
2.5E+00
5.0E-01
1.3E+00
2.3E-02
1.3E-02
4.9E-03
1.5E-02
1.7E+00
3.3E-02
3.0E-04
8.0E-03
2.1E-02
1.1E-02
5.7E-02
2.7E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
5.0E+00
2.4E+00
3.4E+00
2.1E-02
1.6E+00
7.4E-03
1.5E-01
4.0E+00
5.7E-02
2.8E-02
1.8E-02
3.4E-01
2.1E-02
1.1E-01
7.9E-02
Utah
Bkg
2.6E+01
6.4E-02
2.3E-02
3.3E-02
NC
2.4E-02
2.2E-03
2.6E-02
2.8E-02
1.9E-04
2.2E-02
3.9E-03
3.5E-02
3.7E-01
5.4E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-7
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mallard
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
3.0E+00
NC
5.3E-03
1.2E-01
NC
1.5E-01
1.7E-02
1.6E-01
1.1E-02
1.9E-03
1.1E-02
4.2E-03
NC
4.5E-02
1.3E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-8
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
7.2E-01
NC
1.6E+00
2.3E-01
4.8E-02
1.1E-01
6.2E-01
6.0E+01
6.8E-02
1.1E-02
9.5E-03
8.9E-02
NC
2.1E-02
3.4E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.1E+00
NC
1.3E+01
1.7E-01
2.9E+01
4.9E-01
1.6E+02
6.6E+02
7.3E-02
2.4E-01
2.2E-01
2.9E+01
NC
2.6E-02
8.5E+00
WA3
19%
2.0E+00
NC
2.4E+00
1.1E-01
1.1E+01
1.2E-01
1.4E+00
7.3E+01
4.0E-02
1.8E+00
2.7E-02
1.4E+00
NC
4.0E-02
5.6E-01
WA4
4.1%
1.2E+00
NC
3.8E+00
4.7E-01
1.3E-01
1.4E-01
7.6E-01
7.0E+01
2.1E-02
8.6E-02
1.5E-02
3.3E-01
NC
3.8E-02
3.1E-01
WAS
0.73%
5.3E-01
NC
1.3E+00
1.2E-01
6.9E-02
2.1E-02
8.6E-01
8.3E+01
3.3E-03
1.5E-01
8.8E-03
6.7E-01
NC
1.6E-02
3.0E-01
WA6
4.9%
1.6E+00
NC
8.3E-01
2.6E-01
2.3E-01
1.1E-01
1.2E+00
5.3E+01
6.8E-02
1.1E-01
2.2E-02
2.0E-01
NC
3.4E-02
3.8E-01
WA7
1.9%
1.3E+00
NC
2.1E-01
8.4E-02
1.2E-01
6.7E-02
5.5E-01
1.6E+01
2.0E-02
3.1E-02
1.1E-02
7.5E-02
NC
2.4E-02
2.9E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
9.5E-01
NC
4.0E-01
9.1E-02
6.5E-02
8.0E-02
6.4E-01
1.6E+01
1.2E-01
l.OE-02
1.6E-02
5.4E-02
NC
2.2E-02
2.1E-01
WA9
0.46%
7.2E-01
NC
7.6E-01
2.2E-01
3.5E-02
7.5E-02
3.0E-01
2.5E+01
3.3E-02
7.6E-03
9.7E-03
5.9E-02
NC
1.7E-02
1.6E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
1.4E+00
NC
2.0E+00
1.9E-01
4.3E+00
1.1E-01
2.9E+00
6.1E+01
5.7E-02
7.0E-01
2.2E-02
9.4E-01
NC
3.3E-02
4.8E-01
Utah
Bkg
7.7E+00
NC
1.3E-02
3.1E-01
NC
3.8E-01
4.4E-02
4.0E-01
2.8E-02
4.7E-03
2.7E-02
1.1E-02
NC
1.1E-01
3.3E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type B-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-9
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
American Robin
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
9.7E-01
NC
2.1E+00
3.1E-01
6.5E-02
1.5E-01
8.3E-01
8.1E+01
9.2E-02
1.5E-02
1.3E-02
1.2E-01
NC
2.8E-02
4.6E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.5E+00
NC
1.8E+01
2.2E-01
4.0E+01
6.6E-01
2.2E+02
8.9E+02
9.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.0E-01
3.9E+01
NC
3.5E-02
1.2E+01
WA3
19%
3.4E+00
NC
5.0E+00
1.9E-01
2.7E+00
2.1E-01
3.6E+00
3.9E+02
8.0E-02
l.OE+00
5.2E-02
4.3E+00
NC
7.1E-02
1.8E+00
WA4
4.1%
3.0E+00
NC
1.5E+01
1.7E+00
4.0E-01
2.8E-01
1.5E+00
2.5E+02
5.3E-02
2.2E-01
3.3E-02
8.7E-01
NC
6.6E-02
l.OE+00
WAS
0.73%
7.2E-01
NC
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
9.3E-02
2.8E-02
1.2E+00
1.1E+02
4.4E-03
2.0E-01
1.2E-02
9.1E-01
NC
2.1E-02
4.1E-01
WA6
4.9%
3.1E+00
NC
1.4E+00
4.3E-01
6.5E-01
2.0E-01
2.5E+00
6.9E+01
1.6E-01
1.7E-01
3.9E-02
3.4E-01
NC
6.5E-02
1.2E+00
WA7
1.9%
2.5E+00
NC
3.8E-01
1.6E-01
2.9E-01
1.2E-01
7.7E-01
2.8E+01
4.7E-02
7.0E-02
2.0E-02
1.1E-01
NC
4.0E-02
6.9E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
2.2E+00
NC
1.4E+00
2.3E-01
1.9E-01
1.6E-01
2.8E+00
5.2E+01
1.4E-01
3.0E-02
4.0E-02
1.5E-01
NC
4.7E-02
6.6E-01
WA9
0.46%
1.3E+00
NC
1.3E+00
3.4E-01
7.6E-02
1.2E-01
4.5E-01
4.3E+01
6.9E-02
1.3E-02
1.6E-02
9.1E-02
NC
2.7E-02
3.0E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
3.2E+00
NC
4.9E+00
4.8E-01
1.1E+00
2.0E-01
3.2E+00
2.4E+02
1.3E-01
4.2E-01
4.5E-02
8.9E-01
NC
6.7E-02
1.2E+00
Utah
Bkg
1.6E+01
NC
3.4E-02
8.5E-01
NC
7.8E-01
1.1E-01
5.8E-01
7.1E-02
3.5E-03
5.7E-02
2.1E-02
NC
2.6E-01
4.0E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType B-small HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-10
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Masked Shrew
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.8E+01
l.OE+01
3.1E+01
2.9E-01
2.0E-01
8.2E-02
3.6E-01
4.5E+01
7.8E-01
5.2E-03
8.9E-02
3.7E-01
2.6E-01
7.9E-01
6.4E-01
WA2
0.079%
4.3E+01
3.2E+02
2.6E+02
2.1E-01
1.2E+02
3.6E-01
9.5E+01
5.0E+02
8.4E-01
1.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.2E+02
6.4E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E+01
WA3
19%
9.9E+01
6.1E+01
7.3E+01
1.7E-01
8.4E+00
1.1E-01
1.5E+00
2.2E+02
6.8E-01
3.4E-01
3.6E-01
1.3E+01
9.8E-01
2.0E+00
2.6E+00
WA4
4.1%
8.7E+01
1.1E+02
2.2E+02
1.6E+00
1.2E+00
1.6E-01
6.3E-01
1.4E+02
4.5E-01
7.4E-02
2.3E-01
2.6E+00
4.3E-01
1.8E+00
1.4E+00
WAS
0.73%
2.1E+01
3.2E+01
2.5E+01
1.5E-01
2.9E-01
1.5E-02
5.0E-01
6.3E+01
3.8E-02
6.7E-02
8.2E-02
2.8E+00
9.2E-02
5.9E-01
5.7E-01
WA6
4.9%
9.0E+01
1.7E+01
2.0E+01
3.9E-01
2.0E+00
1.1E-01
1.1E+00
3.8E+01
1.3E+00
5.8E-02
2.7E-01
l.OE+00
4.8E-01
1.8E+00
1.7E+00
WA7
1.9%
7.1E+01
4.4E+00
5.5E+00
1.4E-01
8.9E-01
6.9E-02
3.3E-01
1.6E+01
4.0E-01
2.4E-02
1.4E-01
3.3E-01
4.3E-02
1.1E+00
9.7E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.3E+01
5.2E+00
2.0E+01
2.1E-01
5.9E-01
8.7E-02
1.2E+00
2.9E+01
1.2E+00
l.OE-02
2.8E-01
4.6E-01
3.2E-01
1.3E+00
9.3E-01
WA9
0.46%
3.7E+01
6.8E+00
1.9E+01
3.1E-01
2.3E-01
6.6E-02
1.9E-01
2.4E+01
5.8E-01
4.4E-03
1.1E-01
2.8E-01
1.5E-01
7.6E-01
4.2E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
9.4E+01
7.4E+01
7.1E+01
4.4E-01
3.3E+00
1.1E-01
1.4E+00
1.3E+02
1.1E+00
1.4E-01
3.1E-01
2.7E+00
6.4E-01
1.9E+00
1.7E+00
Utah
Bkg
4.6E+02
8.7E-01
4.9E-01
7.8E-01
NC
4.3E-01
4.9E-02
3.3E-01
6.1E-01
1.2E-03
4.0E-01
6.3E-02
5.8E-01
7.3E+00
5.5E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType B-small HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table B-11
HQ TYPE B: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Deer Mouse
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.2E+00
4.6E-01
1.3E+00
1.3E-02
8.8E-03
3.6E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E+00
3.4E-02
2.3E-04
3.9E-03
1.6E-02
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
2.8E-02
WA2
0.079%
1.9E+00
1.4E+01
1.1E+01
9.0E-03
5.4E+00
1.6E-02
4.1E+00
2.2E+01
3.7E-02
4.8E-03
9.2E-02
5.1E+00
2.8E-02
4.3E-02
7.1E-01
WA3
19%
4.3E+00
2.7E+00
3.2E+00
7.5E-03
3.7E-01
4.9E-03
6.8E-02
9.6E+00
3.0E-02
1.5E-02
1.6E-02
5.7E-01
4.3E-02
8.6E-02
1.1E-01
WA4
4.1%
3.8E+00
4.9E+00
9.5E+00
7.0E-02
5.4E-02
6.8E-03
2.7E-02
6.2E+00
2.0E-02
3.2E-03
l.OE-02
1.2E-01
1.9E-02
7.9E-02
6.1E-02
WAS
0.73%
9.1E-01
1.4E+00
1.1E+00
6.4E-03
1.3E-02
6.7E-04
2.2E-02
2.7E+00
1.6E-03
2.9E-03
3.6E-03
1.2E-01
4.0E-03
2.6E-02
2.5E-02
WA6
4.9%
3.9E+00
7.5E-01
8.7E-01
1.7E-02
8.8E-02
4.7E-03
4.8E-02
1.7E+00
5.8E-02
2.5E-03
1.2E-02
4.5E-02
2.1E-02
7.9E-02
7.6E-02
WA7
1.9%
3.1E+00
1.9E-01
2.4E-01
6.2E-03
3.9E-02
3.0E-03
1.5E-02
7.0E-01
1.7E-02
l.OE-03
6.2E-03
1.4E-02
1.9E-03
4.9E-02
4.2E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
2.7E+00
2.3E-01
8.7E-01
9.1E-03
2.6E-02
3.8E-03
5.2E-02
1.3E+00
5.3E-02
4.4E-04
1.2E-02
2.0E-02
1.4E-02
5.7E-02
4.1E-02
WA9
0.46%
1.6E+00
3.0E-01
8.4E-01
1.3E-02
l.OE-02
2.9E-03
8.5E-03
1.1E+00
2.5E-02
1.9E-04
4.9E-03
1.2E-02
6.6E-03
3.3E-02
1.8E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
4.1E+00
3.2E+00
3.1E+00
1.9E-02
1.4E-01
4.8E-03
6.0E-02
5.8E+00
4.8E-02
6.2E-03
1.4E-02
1.2E-01
2.8E-02
8.1E-02
7.3E-02
Utah
Bkg
2.0E+01
3.8E-02
2.1E-02
3.4E-02
NC
1.9E-02
2.2E-03
1.4E-02
2.7E-02
5.2E-05
1.7E-02
2.8E-03
2.5E-02
3.2E-01
2.4E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType B-small HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-l
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red-tailed Hawk
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-2
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mule Deer
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
9.2E-02
3.4E-02
l.OE-01
9.3E-04
6.6E-04
2.7E-04
1.2E-03
1.5E-01
2.5E-03
1.7E-05
2.9E-04
1.2E-03
8.6E-04
2.6E-03
2.1E-03
WA2
0.079%
1.4E-01
l.OE+00
8.5E-01
6.7E-04
4.0E-01
1.2E-03
3.1E-01
1.6E+00
2.7E-03
3.6E-04
6.8E-03
3.8E-01
2.1E-03
3.2E-03
5.2E-02
WA3
19%
2.8E-01
3.1E-01
3.2E-01
5.1E-04
3.8E-01
3.3E-04
5.3E-03
5.3E-01
1.9E-03
6.7E-03
9.2E-04
7.1E-02
2.7E-03
5.5E-03
6.4E-03
WA4
4.1%
2.3E-01
5.1E-01
l.OE+00
5.2E-03
4.6E-03
4.5E-04
2.6E-03
6.2E-01
1.2E-03
6.3E-04
7.0E-04
9.6E-03
2.8E-03
5.5E-03
7.2E-03
WAS
0.73%
6.8E-02
l.OE-01
8.1E-02
4.7E-04
9.3E-04
5.0E-05
1.6E-03
2.0E-01
1.2E-04
2.2E-04
2.7E-04
9.0E-03
3.0E-04
1.9E-03
1.8E-03
WA6
4.9%
2.9E-01
2.7E-01
8.2E-02
1.8E-03
1.1E-02
3.2E-04
4.4E-03
2.2E-01
5.8E-03
3.9E-04
8.7E-04
5.3E-03
2.1E-03
4.9E-03
4.4E-03
WA7
1.9%
2.5E-01
1.5E-02
1.9E-02
4.9E-04
3.2E-03
2.4E-04
1.1E-03
5.5E-02
1.4E-03
8.5E-05
4.9E-04
1.1E-03
1.4E-04
3.8E-03
3.5E-03
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.5E-01
4.5E-02
4.9E-02
6.0E-04
3.6E-03
2.3E-04
3.2E-03
1.5E-01
9.3E-03
3.7E-05
6.4E-04
2.4E-03
1.2E-03
3.1E-03
3.3E-03
WA9
0.46%
1.3E-01
2.4E-02
6.4E-02
l.OE-03
9.1E-04
2.2E-04
6.4E-04
8.4E-02
2.2E-03
1.6E-05
3.9E-04
9.4E-04
5.2E-04
2.5E-03
1.5E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.1E-01
2.4E-01
1.9E-01
l.OE-03
1.4E-01
3.1E-04
1.2E-02
2.5E-01
3.1E-03
2.5E-03
8.2E-04
2.2E-02
1.2E-03
4.4E-03
4.2E-03
Utah
Bkg
1.2E+00
2.5E-03
1.1E-03
1.5E-03
NC
1.1E-03
9.7E-05
1.7E-03
1.2E-03
1.6E-05
9.6E-04
1.9E-04
1.6E-03
1.6E-02
3.5E-04
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-3
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
3.7E-03
2.6E-03
1.1E-03
4.6E-03
5.9E-01
l.OE-02
6.6E-05
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE-02
8.3E-03
WA2
0.079%
5.5E-01
4.1E+00
3.4E+00
2.7E-03
1.6E+00
4.7E-03
1.2E+00
6.4E+00
1.1E-02
1.4E-03
2.7E-02
1.5E+00
8.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.1E-01
WA3
19%
1.1E+00
1.2E+00
1.3E+00
2.0E-03
1.5E+00
1.3E-03
2.1E-02
2.1E+00
7.5E-03
2.7E-02
3.6E-03
2.8E-01
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.5E-02
WA4
4.1%
9.2E-01
2.0E+00
4.2E+00
2.1E-02
1.8E-02
1.8E-03
l.OE-02
2.4E+00
4.9E-03
2.5E-03
2.8E-03
3.8E-02
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.8E-02
WAS
0.73%
2.7E-01
4.1E-01
3.2E-01
1.9E-03
3.7E-03
2.0E-04
6.5E-03
8.1E-01
4.8E-04
8.7E-04
1.1E-03
3.6E-02
1.2E-03
7.6E-03
7.3E-03
WA6
4.9%
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
3.2E-01
7.3E-03
4.3E-02
1.3E-03
1.7E-02
8.9E-01
2.3E-02
1.6E-03
3.4E-03
2.1E-02
8.2E-03
1.9E-02
1.8E-02
WA7
1.9%
9.8E-01
6.1E-02
7.6E-02
2.0E-03
1.3E-02
9.5E-04
4.3E-03
2.2E-01
5.6E-03
3.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.3E-03
5.7E-04
1.5E-02
1.4E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.1E-01
1.8E-01
1.9E-01
2.4E-03
1.4E-02
9.2E-04
1.3E-02
6.1E-01
3.7E-02
1.5E-04
2.5E-03
9.4E-03
4.6E-03
1.2E-02
1.3E-02
WA9
0.46%
5.2E-01
9.5E-02
2.5E-01
4.1E-03
3.6E-03
8.7E-04
2.5E-03
3.3E-01
8.6E-03
6.3E-05
1.5E-03
3.7E-03
2.1E-03
9.9E-03
5.9E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
8.4E-01
9.4E-01
7.6E-01
4.0E-03
5.7E-01
1.2E-03
4.6E-02
l.OE+00
1.2E-02
9.8E-03
3.2E-03
8.7E-02
4.8E-03
1.7E-02
1.7E-02
Utah
Bkg
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-4
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Cliff Swallow
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
5.9E-01
NC
1.3E+00
1.9E-01
4.0E-02
9.0E-02
5.0E-01
4.9E+01
5.6E-02
9.2E-03
7.8E-03
7.3E-02
NC
1.7E-02
2.8E-01
WA2
0.079%
9.0E-01
NC
1.1E+01
1.4E-01
2.4E+01
4.0E-01
1.3E+02
5.4E+02
6.0E-02
2.0E-01
1.8E-01
2.3E+01
NC
2.1E-02
7.0E+00
WA3
19%
1.8E+00
NC
4.1E+00
l.OE-01
2.3E+01
1.1E-01
2.3E+00
1.8E+02
4.1E-02
3.7E+00
2.5E-02
4.4E+00
NC
3.7E-02
8.5E-01
WA4
4.1%
1.5E+00
NC
1.3E+01
1.1E+00
2.8E-01
1.5E-01
1.1E+00
2.0E+02
2.7E-02
3.5E-01
1.9E-02
5.9E-01
NC
3.7E-02
9.5E-01
WAS
0.73%
4.3E-01
NC
l.OE+00
9.6E-02
5.6E-02
1.7E-02
7.1E-01
6.8E+01
2.7E-03
1.2E-01
7.2E-03
5.5E-01
NC
1.3E-02
2.5E-01
WA6
4.9%
1.9E+00
NC
l.OE+00
3.7E-01
6.6E-01
1.1E-01
1.9E+00
7.5E+01
1.3E-01
2.2E-01
2.3E-02
3.3E-01
NC
3.3E-02
5.9E-01
WA7
1.9%
1.6E+00
NC
2.5E-01
l.OE-01
1.9E-01
8.1E-02
4.7E-01
1.8E+01
3.1E-02
4.7E-02
1.3E-02
6.7E-02
NC
2.5E-02
4.7E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
9.9E-01
NC
6.2E-01
1.2E-01
2.2E-01
7.8E-02
1.4E+00
5.1E+01
2.0E-01
2.1E-02
1.7E-02
1.4E-01
NC
2.1E-02
4.5E-01
WA9
0.46%
8.4E-01
NC
8.2E-01
2.1E-01
5.5E-02
7.4E-02
2.7E-01
2.8E+01
4.7E-02
8.8E-03
l.OE-02
5.8E-02
NC
1.7E-02
2.0E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
1.4E+00
NC
2.5E+00
2.1E-01
8.6E+00
l.OE-01
5.0E+00
8.4E+01
6.8E-02
1.4E+00
2.2E-02
1.3E+00
NC
2.9E-02
5.5E-01
Utah
Bkg
7.5E+00
NC
1.4E-02
3.0E-01
NC
3.6E-01
4.2E-02
5.6E-01
2.7E-02
8.9E-03
2.6E-02
1.1E-02
NC
1.1E-01
4.6E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-5
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.9E-01
NC
4.1E-01
6.1E-02
1.3E-02
2.9E-02
1.6E-01
1.6E+01
1.8E-02
3.0E-03
2.5E-03
2.3E-02
NC
5.5E-03
9.0E-02
WA2
0.079%
2.9E-01
NC
3.5E+00
4.4E-02
7.8E+00
1.3E-01
4.3E+01
1.7E+02
1.9E-02
6.4E-02
5.9E-02
7.6E+00
NC
6.9E-03
2.3E+00
WA3
19%
5.8E-01
NC
1.3E+00
3.3E-02
7.4E+00
3.6E-02
7.4E-01
5.7E+01
1.3E-02
1.2E+00
7.9E-03
1.4E+00
NC
1.2E-02
2.8E-01
WA4
4.1%
4.8E-01
NC
4.3E+00
3.4E-01
9.0E-02
4.9E-02
3.7E-01
6.6E+01
8.8E-03
1.1E-01
6.0E-03
1.9E-01
NC
1.2E-02
3.1E-01
WAS
0.73%
1.4E-01
NC
3.4E-01
3.1E-02
1.8E-02
5.5E-03
2.3E-01
2.2E+01
8.7E-04
3.9E-02
2.3E-03
1.8E-01
NC
4.2E-03
7.9E-02
WA6
4.9%
6.0E-01
NC
3.4E-01
1.2E-01
2.1E-01
3.5E-02
6.1E-01
2.4E+01
4.1E-02
7.0E-02
7.5E-03
1.1E-01
NC
1.1E-02
1.9E-01
WA7
1.9%
5.1E-01
NC
7.9E-02
3.2E-02
6.3E-02
2.6E-02
1.5E-01
5.9E+00
l.OE-02
1.5E-02
4.3E-03
2.2E-02
NC
8.2E-03
1.5E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
3.2E-01
NC
2.0E-01
3.9E-02
6.9E-02
2.5E-02
4.5E-01
1.6E+01
6.6E-02
6.6E-03
5.5E-03
4.7E-02
NC
6.8E-03
1.4E-01
WA9
0.46%
2.7E-01
NC
2.7E-01
6.8E-02
1.8E-02
2.4E-02
8.9E-02
9.0E+00
1.5E-02
2.8E-03
3.3E-03
1.9E-02
NC
5.4E-03
6.4E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
4.4E-01
NC
8.0E-01
6.6E-02
2.8E+00
3.3E-02
1.6E+00
2.7E+01
2.2E-02
4.4E-01
7.1E-03
4.3E-01
NC
9.5E-03
1.8E-01
Utah
Bkg
2.4E+00
NC
4.6E-03
9.6E-02
NC
1.2E-01
1.3E-02
1.8E-01
8.7E-03
2.9E-03
8.3E-03
3.7E-03
NC
3.5E-02
1.5E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-6
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-7
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mallard
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
1.3E+00
NC
2.5E-03
5.3E-02
NC
6.4E-02
7.5E-03
9.9E-02
4.8E-03
1.6E-03
4.6E-03
2.0E-03
NC
1.9E-02
8.2E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-8
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
4.7E-01
NC
l.OE+00
1.5E-01
3.1E-02
7.2E-02
4.0E-01
3.9E+01
4.4E-02
7.3E-03
6.2E-03
5.8E-02
NC
1.4E-02
2.2E-01
WA2
0.079%
7.1E-01
NC
8.7E+00
1.1E-01
1.9E+01
3.2E-01
1.1E+02
4.3E+02
4.7E-02
1.6E-01
1.4E-01
1.9E+01
NC
1.7E-02
5.5E+00
WA3
19%
1.4E+00
NC
3.2E+00
8.2E-02
1.8E+01
8.8E-02
1.8E+00
1.4E+02
3.3E-02
2.9E+00
2.0E-02
3.5E+00
NC
2.9E-02
6.8E-01
WA4
4.1%
1.2E+00
NC
1.1E+01
8.4E-01
2.2E-01
1.2E-01
9.1E-01
1.6E+02
2.2E-02
2.7E-01
1.5E-02
4.7E-01
NC
2.9E-02
7.6E-01
WAS
0.73%
3.4E-01
NC
8.3E-01
7.6E-02
4.5E-02
1.3E-02
5.6E-01
5.4E+01
2.1E-03
9.6E-02
5.7E-03
4.4E-01
NC
l.OE-02
2.0E-01
WA6
4.9%
1.5E+00
NC
8.3E-01
3.0E-01
5.2E-01
8.5E-02
1.5E+00
5.9E+01
l.OE-01
1.7E-01
1.8E-02
2.6E-01
NC
2.6E-02
4.7E-01
WA7
1.9%
1.3E+00
NC
1.9E-01
8.0E-02
1.5E-01
6.4E-02
3.7E-01
1.4E+01
2.5E-02
3.7E-02
1.1E-02
5.3E-02
NC
2.0E-02
3.7E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
7.8E-01
NC
5.0E-01
9.6E-02
1.7E-01
6.2E-02
1.1E+00
4.0E+01
1.6E-01
1.6E-02
1.4E-02
1.1E-01
NC
1.7E-02
3.5E-01
WA9
0.46%
6.7E-01
NC
6.5E-01
1.7E-01
4.3E-02
5.9E-02
2.2E-01
2.2E+01
3.8E-02
7.0E-03
8.2E-03
4.6E-02
NC
1.3E-02
1.6E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
1.1E+00
NC
2.0E+00
1.6E-01
6.8E+00
8.2E-02
4.0E+00
6.7E+01
5.4E-02
1.1E+00
1.7E-02
1.1E+00
NC
2.3E-02
4.4E-01
Utah
Bkg
6.0E+00
NC
1.1E-02
2.4E-01
NC
2.8E-01
3.3E-02
4.4E-01
2.1E-02
7.0E-03
2.0E-02
9.0E-03
NC
8.6E-02
3.7E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-9
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
American Robin
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
9.7E-01
NC
2.1E+00
3.1E-01
6.5E-02
1.5E-01
8.3E-01
8.1E+01
9.2E-02
1.5E-02
1.3E-02
1.2E-01
NC
2.8E-02
4.6E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.5E+00
NC
1.8E+01
2.2E-01
4.0E+01
6.6E-01
2.2E+02
8.9E+02
9.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.0E-01
3.9E+01
NC
3.5E-02
1.2E+01
WA3
19%
3.0E+00
NC
6.7E+00
1.7E-01
3.8E+01
1.8E-01
3.8E+00
2.9E+02
6.8E-02
6.1E+00
4.1E-02
7.2E+00
NC
6.1E-02
1.4E+00
WA4
4.1%
2.5E+00
NC
2.2E+01
1.7E+00
4.6E-01
2.5E-01
1.9E+00
3.4E+02
4.5E-02
5.7E-01
3.1E-02
9.8E-01
NC
6.1E-02
1.6E+00
WAS
0.73%
7.2E-01
NC
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
9.3E-02
2.8E-02
1.2E+00
1.1E+02
4.4E-03
2.0E-01
1.2E-02
9.1E-01
NC
2.1E-02
4.1E-01
WA6
4.9%
3.1E+00
NC
1.7E+00
6.2E-01
1.1E+00
1.8E-01
3.1E+00
1.2E+02
2.1E-01
3.6E-01
3.9E-02
5.4E-01
NC
5.5E-02
9.8E-01
WA7
1.9%
2.6E+00
NC
4.1E-01
1.7E-01
3.2E-01
1.3E-01
7.8E-01
3.0E+01
5.1E-02
7.8E-02
2.2E-02
1.1E-01
NC
4.2E-02
7.7E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.6E+00
NC
l.OE+00
2.0E-01
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
2.3E+00
8.4E+01
3.4E-01
3.4E-02
2.8E-02
2.4E-01
NC
3.5E-02
7.4E-01
WA9
0.46%
1.4E+00
NC
1.4E+00
3.5E-01
9.1E-02
1.2E-01
4.5E-01
4.6E+01
7.8E-02
1.5E-02
1.7E-02
9.5E-02
NC
2.8E-02
3.3E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.3E+00
NC
4.1E+00
3.4E-01
1.4E+01
1.7E-01
8.3E+00
1.4E+02
1.1E-01
2.3E+00
3.6E-02
2.2E+00
NC
4.9E-02
9.2E-01
Utah
Bkg
1.2E+01
NC
2.3E-02
4.9E-01
NC
5.9E-01
6.9E-02
9.2E-01
4.5E-02
1.5E-02
4.3E-02
1.9E-02
NC
1.8E-01
7.6E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-10
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Masked Shrew
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.8E+01
l.OE+01
3.1E+01
2.9E-01
2.0E-01
8.2E-02
3.6E-01
4.5E+01
7.8E-01
5.2E-03
8.9E-02
3.7E-01
2.6E-01
7.9E-01
6.4E-01
WA2
0.079%
4.3E+01
3.2E+02
2.6E+02
2.1E-01
1.2E+02
3.6E-01
9.5E+01
5.0E+02
8.4E-01
1.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.2E+02
6.4E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E+01
WA3
19%
8.7E+01
9.6E+01
9.8E+01
1.6E-01
1.2E+02
l.OE-01
1.6E+00
1.6E+02
5.8E-01
2.1E+00
2.8E-01
2.2E+01
8.3E-01
1.7E+00
2.0E+00
WA4
4.1%
7.2E+01
1.6E+02
3.2E+02
1.6E+00
1.4E+00
1.4E-01
8.1E-01
1.9E+02
3.8E-01
1.9E-01
2.1E-01
3.0E+00
8.7E-01
1.7E+00
2.2E+00
WAS
0.73%
2.1E+01
3.2E+01
2.5E+01
1.5E-01
2.9E-01
1.5E-02
5.0E-01
6.3E+01
3.8E-02
6.7E-02
8.2E-02
2.8E+00
9.2E-02
5.9E-01
5.7E-01
WA6
4.9%
9.0E+01
8.2E+01
2.5E+01
5.7E-01
3.4E+00
9.8E-02
1.3E+00
6.9E+01
1.8E+00
1.2E-01
2.7E-01
1.6E+00
6.4E-01
1.5E+00
1.4E+00
WA7
1.9%
7.6E+01
4.7E+00
5.9E+00
1.5E-01
9.9E-01
7.3E-02
3.4E-01
1.7E+01
4.4E-01
2.6E-02
1.5E-01
3.4E-01
4.4E-02
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
4.7E+01
1.4E+01
1.5E+01
1.8E-01
1.1E+00
7.1E-02
9.9E-01
4.7E+01
2.9E+00
1.1E-02
2.0E-01
7.3E-01
3.6E-01
9.6E-01
l.OE+00
WA9
0.46%
4.0E+01
7.3E+00
2.0E+01
3.2E-01
2.8E-01
6.7E-02
2.0E-01
2.6E+01
6.6E-01
4.9E-03
1.2E-01
2.9E-01
1.6E-01
7.7E-01
4.6E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
6.5E+01
7.3E+01
5.9E+01
3.1E-01
4.4E+01
9.4E-02
3.6E+00
7.8E+01
9.6E-01
7.6E-01
2.5E-01
6.8E+00
3.8E-01
1.3E+00
1.3E+00
Utah
Bkg
3.6E+02
7.7E-01
3.4E-01
4.5E-01
NC
3.3E-01
3.0E-02
5.2E-01
3.8E-01
4.9E-03
3.0E-01
5.7E-02
4.8E-01
5.0E+00
1.1E-01
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table C-ll
HQ TYPE C: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Deer Mouse
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.2E+00
4.6E-01
1.3E+00
1.3E-02
8.8E-03
3.6E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E+00
3.4E-02
2.3E-04
3.9E-03
1.6E-02
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
2.8E-02
WA2
0.079%
1.9E+00
1.4E+01
1.1E+01
9.0E-03
5.4E+00
1.6E-02
4.1E+00
2.2E+01
3.7E-02
4.8E-03
9.2E-02
5.1E+00
2.8E-02
4.3E-02
7.1E-01
WA3
19%
3.8E+00
4.2E+00
4.3E+00
6.9E-03
5.1E+00
4.4E-03
7.2E-02
7.2E+00
2.5E-02
9.0E-02
1.2E-02
9.6E-01
3.6E-02
7.4E-02
8.6E-02
WA4
4.1%
3.1E+00
6.9E+00
1.4E+01
7.0E-02
6.2E-02
6.1E-03
3.6E-02
8.3E+00
1.7E-02
8.4E-03
9.4E-03
1.3E-01
3.8E-02
7.4E-02
9.6E-02
WAS
0.73%
9.1E-01
1.4E+00
1.1E+00
6.4E-03
1.3E-02
6.7E-04
2.2E-02
2.7E+00
1.6E-03
2.9E-03
3.6E-03
1.2E-01
4.0E-03
2.6E-02
2.5E-02
WA6
4.9%
3.9E+00
3.6E+00
1.1E+00
2.5E-02
1.5E-01
4.3E-03
5.9E-02
3.0E+00
7.8E-02
5.3E-03
1.2E-02
7.2E-02
2.8E-02
6.6E-02
6.0E-02
WA7
1.9%
3.3E+00
2.1E-01
2.6E-01
6.7E-03
4.3E-02
3.2E-03
1.5E-02
7.4E-01
1.9E-02
1.1E-03
6.7E-03
1.5E-02
1.9E-03
5.1E-02
4.7E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
2.1E+00
6.0E-01
6.5E-01
8.1E-03
4.8E-02
3.1E-03
4.3E-02
2.1E+00
1.2E-01
5.0E-04
8.6E-03
3.2E-02
1.6E-02
4.2E-02
4.5E-02
WA9
0.46%
1.8E+00
3.2E-01
8.6E-01
1.4E-02
1.2E-02
2.9E-03
8.6E-03
1.1E+00
2.9E-02
2.1E-04
5.2E-03
1.3E-02
7.0E-03
3.4E-02
2.0E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.9E+00
3.2E+00
2.6E+00
1.4E-02
1.9E+00
4.1E-03
1.6E-01
3.4E+00
4.2E-02
3.3E-02
1.1E-02
3.0E-01
1.6E-02
5.9E-02
5.6E-02
Utah
Bkg
1.6E+01
3.4E-02
1.5E-02
2.0E-02
NC
1.4E-02
1.3E-03
2.3E-02
1.7E-02
2.2E-04
1.3E-02
2.5E-03
2.1E-02
2.2E-01
4.7E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRY not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType C.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-l
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red-tailed Hawk
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.1E-02
NC
4.5E-02
6.6E-03
1.4E-03
3.2E-03
1.8E-02
1.7E+00
2.0E-03
3.3E-04
2.7E-04
2.6E-03
NC
6.0E-04
9.8E-03
WA2
0.079%
3.2E-02
NC
3.9E-01
4.8E-03
8.5E-01
1.4E-02
4.7E+00
1.9E+01
2.1E-03
6.9E-03
6.4E-03
8.2E-01
NC
7.5E-04
2.5E-01
WA3
19%
6.3E-02
NC
1.4E-01
3.6E-03
8.0E-01
3.9E-03
8.1E-02
6.2E+00
1.4E-03
1.3E-01
8.6E-04
1.5E-01
NC
1.3E-03
3.0E-02
WA4
4.1%
5.2E-02
NC
4.7E-01
3.7E-02
9.8E-03
5.4E-03
4.0E-02
7.2E+00
9.6E-04
1.2E-02
6.6E-04
2.1E-02
NC
1.3E-03
3.4E-02
WAS
0.73%
1.5E-02
NC
3.7E-02
3.4E-03
2.0E-03
6.0E-04
2.5E-02
2.4E+00
9.4E-05
4.3E-03
2.5E-04
1.9E-02
NC
4.6E-04
8.7E-03
WA6
4.9%
6.6E-02
NC
3.7E-02
1.3E-02
2.3E-02
3.8E-03
6.6E-02
2.6E+00
4.5E-03
7.7E-03
8.2E-04
1.1E-02
NC
1.2E-03
2.1E-02
WA7
1.9%
5.6E-02
NC
8.6E-03
3.5E-03
6.8E-03
2.8E-03
1.7E-02
6.4E-01
1.1E-03
1.7E-03
4.7E-04
2.4E-03
NC
8.9E-04
1.6E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
3.5E-02
NC
2.2E-02
4.3E-03
7.6E-03
2.8E-03
4.9E-02
1.8E+00
7.2E-03
7.2E-04
6.0E-04
5.1E-03
NC
7.4E-04
1.6E-02
WA9
0.46%
3.0E-02
NC
2.9E-02
7.4E-03
1.9E-03
2.6E-03
9.7E-03
9.8E-01
1.7E-03
3.1E-04
3.6E-04
2.0E-03
NC
5.9E-04
7.0E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
4.8E-02
NC
8.7E-02
7.2E-03
3.0E-01
3.6E-03
1.8E-01
3.0E+00
2.4E-03
4.8E-02
7.7E-04
4.7E-02
NC
l.OE-03
2.0E-02
Utah
Bkg
2.7E-01
NC
5.0E-04
l.OE-02
NC
1.3E-02
1.5E-03
2.0E-02
9.5E-04
3.1E-04
9.0E-04
4.0E-04
NC
3.8E-03
1.6E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-2
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mule Deer
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.6E-01
9.6E-02
2.8E-01
2.6E-03
1.9E-03
7.5E-04
3.3E-03
4.2E-01
7.2E-03
4.7E-05
8.2E-04
3.4E-03
2.4E-03
7.2E-03
5.9E-03
WA2
0.079%
4.0E-01
2.9E+00
2.4E+00
1.9E-03
1.1E+00
3.3E-03
8.7E-01
4.6E+00
7.7E-03
l.OE-03
1.9E-02
1.1E+00
5.9E-03
9.0E-03
1.5E-01
WA3
19%
8.0E-01
8.8E-01
9.0E-01
1.4E-03
1.1E+00
9.3E-04
1.5E-02
1.5E+00
5.3E-03
1.9E-02
2.6E-03
2.0E-01
7.6E-03
1.6E-02
1.8E-02
WA4
4.1%
6.6E-01
1.5E+00
3.0E+00
1.5E-02
1.3E-02
1.3E-03
7.5E-03
1.7E+00
3.5E-03
1.8E-03
2.0E-03
2.7E-02
8.0E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E-02
WAS
0.73%
1.9E-01
2.9E-01
2.3E-01
1.3E-03
2.6E-03
1.4E-04
4.6E-03
5.8E-01
3.5E-04
6.2E-04
7.6E-04
2.5E-02
8.5E-04
5.5E-03
5.2E-03
WA6
4.9%
8.3E-01
7.6E-01
2.3E-01
5.2E-03
3.1E-02
9.0E-04
1.2E-02
6.4E-01
1.6E-02
1.1E-03
2.5E-03
1.5E-02
5.8E-03
1.4E-02
1.3E-02
WA7
1.9%
7.0E-01
4.4E-02
5.4E-02
1.4E-03
9.1E-03
6.7E-04
3.1E-03
1.6E-01
4.0E-03
2.4E-04
1.4E-03
3.1E-03
4.1E-04
1.1E-02
9.9E-03
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
4.4E-01
1.3E-01
1.4E-01
1.7E-03
l.OE-02
6.5E-04
9.1E-03
4.3E-01
2.6E-02
1.1E-04
1.8E-03
6.7E-03
3.3E-03
8.8E-03
9.5E-03
WA9
0.46%
3.7E-01
6.8E-02
1.8E-01
3.0E-03
2.6E-03
6.2E-04
1.8E-03
2.4E-01
6.1E-03
4.5E-05
1.1E-03
2.7E-03
1.5E-03
7.1E-03
4.2E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
6.0E-01
6.7E-01
5.5E-01
2.9E-03
4.0E-01
8.7E-04
3.3E-02
7.2E-01
8.8E-03
7.0E-03
2.3E-03
6.2E-02
3.5E-03
1.2E-02
1.2E-02
Utah
Bkg
3.3E+00
7.1E-03
3.1E-03
4.2E-03
NC
3.0E-03
2.7E-04
4.7E-03
3.5E-03
4.5E-05
2.7E-03
5.3E-04
4.4E-03
4.6E-02
9.8E-04
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-3
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
l.OE+00
3.7E-01
1.1E+00
l.OE-02
7.2E-03
2.9E-03
1.3E-02
1.6E+00
2.8E-02
1.8E-04
3.2E-03
1.3E-02
9.5E-03
2.8E-02
2.3E-02
WA2
0.079%
1.5E+00
1.1E+01
9.4E+00
7.4E-03
4.4E+00
1.3E-02
3.4E+00
1.8E+01
3.0E-02
3.9E-03
7.5E-02
4.2E+00
2.3E-02
3.5E-02
5.8E-01
WA3
19%
3.1E+00
3.4E+00
3.5E+00
5.6E-03
4.2E+00
3.6E-03
5.9E-02
5.9E+00
2.1E-02
7.4E-02
l.OE-02
7.9E-01
3.0E-02
6.1E-02
7.1E-02
WA4
4.1%
2.6E+00
5.7E+00
1.2E+01
5.8E-02
5.1E-02
5.0E-03
2.9E-02
6.8E+00
1.4E-02
6.9E-03
7.7E-03
1.1E-01
3.1E-02
6.1E-02
7.9E-02
WAS
0.73%
7.5E-01
1.1E+00
9.0E-01
5.2E-03
l.OE-02
5.5E-04
1.8E-02
2.3E+00
1.4E-03
2.4E-03
3.0E-03
9.9E-02
3.3E-03
2.1E-02
2.0E-02
WA6
4.9%
3.2E+00
3.0E+00
9.0E-01
2.0E-02
1.2E-01
3.5E-03
4.8E-02
2.5E+00
6.4E-02
4.4E-03
9.6E-03
5.9E-02
2.3E-02
5.4E-02
4.9E-02
WA7
1.9%
2.7E+00
1.7E-01
2.1E-01
5.5E-03
3.5E-02
2.6E-03
1.2E-02
6.1E-01
1.6E-02
9.4E-04
5.5E-03
1.2E-02
1.6E-03
4.2E-02
3.9E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.7E+00
4.9E-01
5.4E-01
6.6E-03
3.9E-02
2.6E-03
3.6E-02
1.7E+00
l.OE-01
4.1E-04
7.1E-03
2.6E-02
1.3E-02
3.4E-02
3.7E-02
WA9
0.46%
1.4E+00
2.6E-01
7.1E-01
1.2E-02
l.OE-02
2.4E-03
7.0E-03
9.3E-01
2.4E-02
1.8E-04
4.3E-03
l.OE-02
5.7E-03
2.8E-02
1.6E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.3E+00
2.6E+00
2.1E+00
1.1E-02
1.6E+00
3.4E-03
1.3E-01
2.8E+00
3.5E-02
2.7E-02
9.0E-03
2.4E-01
1.4E-02
4.8E-02
4.6E-02
Utah
Bkg
1.3E+01
2.8E-02
1.2E-02
1.6E-02
NC
1.2E-02
1.1E-03
1.8E-02
1.4E-02
1.8E-04
1.1E-02
2.1E-03
1.7E-02
1.8E-01
3.8E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-3(b)
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
3.7E-03
2.6E-03
1.1E-03
4.6E-03
5.9E-01
l.OE-02
6.6E-05
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE-02
8.3E-03
WA2
0.079%
5.5E-01
4.1E+00
3.4E+00
2.7E-03
1.6E+00
4.7E-03
1.2E+00
6.4E+00
1.1E-02
1.4E-03
2.7E-02
1.5E+00
8.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.1E-01
WA3
19%
1.1E+00
1.2E+00
1.3E+00
2.0E-03
1.5E+00
1.3E-03
2.1E-02
2.1E+00
7.5E-03
2.7E-02
3.6E-03
2.8E-01
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.5E-02
WA4
4.1%
9.2E-01
2.0E+00
4.2E+00
2.1E-02
1.8E-02
1.8E-03
l.OE-02
2.4E+00
4.9E-03
2.5E-03
2.8E-03
3.8E-02
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.8E-02
WAS
0.73%
2.7E-01
4.1E-01
3.2E-01
1.9E-03
3.7E-03
2.0E-04
6.5E-03
8.1E-01
4.8E-04
8.7E-04
1.1E-03
3.6E-02
1.2E-03
7.6E-03
7.3E-03
WA6
4.9%
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
3.2E-01
7.3E-03
4.3E-02
1.3E-03
1.7E-02
8.9E-01
2.3E-02
1.6E-03
3.4E-03
2.1E-02
8.2E-03
1.9E-02
1.8E-02
WA7
1.9%
9.8E-01
6.1E-02
7.6E-02
2.0E-03
1.3E-02
9.5E-04
4.3E-03
2.2E-01
5.6E-03
3.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.3E-03
5.7E-04
1.5E-02
1.4E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.1E-01
1.8E-01
1.9E-01
2.4E-03
1.4E-02
9.2E-04
1.3E-02
6.1E-01
3.7E-02
1.5E-04
2.5E-03
9.4E-03
4.6E-03
1.2E-02
1.3E-02
WA9
0.46%
5.2E-01
9.5E-02
2.5E-01
4.1E-03
3.6E-03
8.7E-04
2.5E-03
3.3E-01
8.6E-03
6.3E-05
1.5E-03
3.7E-03
2.1E-03
9.9E-03
5.9E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
8.4E-01
9.4E-01
7.6E-01
4.0E-03
5.7E-01
1.2E-03
4.6E-02
l.OE+00
1.2E-02
9.8E-03
3.2E-03
8.7E-02
4.8E-03
1.7E-02
1.7E-02
Utah
Bkg
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (b).xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-3(c)
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Red Fox
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.6E-01
1.3E-01
4.0E-01
3.7E-03
2.6E-03
1.1E-03
4.6E-03
5.9E-01
l.OE-02
6.6E-05
1.2E-03
4.7E-03
3.4E-03
l.OE-02
8.3E-03
WA2
0.079%
5.5E-01
4.1E+00
3.4E+00
2.7E-03
1.6E+00
4.7E-03
1.2E+00
6.4E+00
1.1E-02
1.4E-03
2.7E-02
1.5E+00
8.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.1E-01
WA3
19%
1.1E+00
1.2E+00
1.3E+00
2.0E-03
1.5E+00
1.3E-03
2.1E-02
2.1E+00
7.5E-03
2.7E-02
3.6E-03
2.8E-01
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.5E-02
WA4
4.1%
9.2E-01
2.0E+00
4.2E+00
2.1E-02
1.8E-02
1.8E-03
l.OE-02
2.4E+00
4.9E-03
2.5E-03
2.8E-03
3.8E-02
1.1E-02
2.2E-02
2.8E-02
WAS
0.73%
2.7E-01
4.1E-01
3.2E-01
1.9E-03
3.7E-03
2.0E-04
6.5E-03
8.1E-01
4.8E-04
8.7E-04
1.1E-03
3.6E-02
1.2E-03
7.6E-03
7.3E-03
WA6
4.9%
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
3.2E-01
7.3E-03
4.3E-02
1.3E-03
1.7E-02
8.9E-01
2.3E-02
1.6E-03
3.4E-03
2.1E-02
8.2E-03
1.9E-02
1.8E-02
WA7
1.9%
9.8E-01
6.1E-02
7.6E-02
2.0E-03
1.3E-02
9.5E-04
4.3E-03
2.2E-01
5.6E-03
3.4E-04
2.0E-03
4.3E-03
5.7E-04
1.5E-02
1.4E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.1E-01
1.8E-01
1.9E-01
2.4E-03
1.4E-02
9.2E-04
1.3E-02
6.1E-01
3.7E-02
1.5E-04
2.5E-03
9.4E-03
4.6E-03
1.2E-02
1.3E-02
WA9
0.46%
5.2E-01
9.5E-02
2.5E-01
4.1E-03
3.6E-03
8.7E-04
2.5E-03
3.3E-01
8.6E-03
6.3E-05
1.5E-03
3.7E-03
2.1E-03
9.9E-03
5.9E-03
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
8.4E-01
9.4E-01
7.6E-01
4.0E-03
5.7E-01
1.2E-03
4.6E-02
l.OE+00
1.2E-02
9.8E-03
3.2E-03
8.7E-02
4.8E-03
1.7E-02
1.7E-02
Utah
Bkg
4.7E+00
9.9E-03
4.4E-03
5.8E-03
NC
4.2E-03
3.8E-04
6.6E-03
4.9E-03
6.4E-05
3.8E-03
7.4E-04
6.2E-03
6.4E-02
1.4E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-red fox (c).xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-4
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Cliff Swallow
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.2E+00
NC
2.6E+00
3.8E-01
7.9E-02
1.8E-01
l.OE+00
9.8E+01
1.1E-01
1.8E-02
1.6E-02
1.5E-01
NC
3.4E-02
5.6E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.8E+00
NC
2.2E+01
2.7E-01
4.8E+01
8.0E-01
2.7E+02
1.1E+03
1.2E-01
3.9E-01
3.6E-01
4.7E+01
NC
4.3E-02
1.4E+01
WA3
19%
3.6E+00
NC
8.1E+00
2.1E-01
4.6E+01
2.2E-01
4.6E+00
3.5E+02
8.2E-02
7.4E+00
4.9E-02
8.8E+00
NC
7.4E-02
1.7E+00
WA4
4.1%
3.0E+00
NC
2.7E+01
2.1E+00
5.6E-01
3.0E-01
2.3E+00
4.1E+02
5.4E-02
6.9E-01
3.7E-02
1.2E+00
NC
7.4E-02
1.9E+00
WAS
0.73%
8.7E-01
NC
2.1E+00
1.9E-01
1.1E-01
3.4E-02
1.4E+00
1.4E+02
5.4E-03
2.4E-01
1.4E-02
1.1E+00
NC
2.6E-02
4.9E-01
WA6
4.9%
3.7E+00
NC
2.1E+00
7.4E-01
1.3E+00
2.2E-01
3.8E+00
1.5E+02
2.5E-01
4.4E-01
4.7E-02
6.5E-01
NC
6.6E-02
1.2E+00
WA7
1.9%
3.2E+00
NC
4.9E-01
2.0E-01
3.9E-01
1.6E-01
9.4E-01
3.6E+01
6.2E-02
9.4E-02
2.6E-02
1.3E-01
NC
5.1E-02
9.3E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
2.0E+00
NC
1.2E+00
2.4E-01
4.3E-01
1.6E-01
2.8E+00
l.OE+02
4.1E-01
4.1E-02
3.4E-02
2.9E-01
NC
4.2E-02
8.9E-01
WA9
0.46%
1.7E+00
NC
1.6E+00
4.2E-01
1.1E-01
1.5E-01
5.5E-01
5.6E+01
9.5E-02
1.8E-02
2.1E-02
1.2E-01
NC
3.4E-02
4.0E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
2.7E+00
NC
4.9E+00
4.1E-01
1.7E+01
2.1E-01
l.OE+01
1.7E+02
1.4E-01
2.7E+00
4.4E-02
2.7E+00
NC
5.9E-02
1.1E+00
Utah
Bkg
1.5E+01
NC
2.8E-02
6.0E-01
NC
7.2E-01
8.4E-02
1.1E+00
5.4E-02
1.8E-02
5.1E-02
2.3E-02
NC
2.2E-01
9.2E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-5
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Mourning Dove |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
3.8E-01
NC
8.3E-01
1.2E-01
2.6E-02
5.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.2E+01
3.6E-02
6.0E-03
5.0E-03
4.7E-02
NC
1.1E-02
1.8E-01
WA2
0.079%
5.8E-01
NC
7.1E+00
8.8E-02
1.6E+01
2.6E-01
8.6E+01
3.5E+02
3.8E-02
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
1.5E+01
NC
1.4E-02
4.5E+00
WA3
19%
1.2E+00
NC
2.6E+00
6.7E-02
1.5E+01
7.2E-02
1.5E+00
1.1E+02
2.7E-02
2.4E+00
1.6E-02
2.8E+00
NC
2.4E-02
5.5E-01
WA4
4.1%
9.6E-01
NC
8.7E+00
6.8E-01
1.8E-01
9.8E-02
7.4E-01
1.3E+02
1.8E-02
2.2E-01
1.2E-02
3.8E-01
NC
2.4E-02
6.2E-01
WAS
0.73%
2.8E-01
NC
6.7E-01
6.2E-02
3.6E-02
1.1E-02
4.6E-01
4.4E+01
1.7E-03
7.8E-02
4.6E-03
3.6E-01
NC
8.4E-03
1.6E-01
WA6
4.9%
1.2E+00
NC
6.8E-01
2.4E-01
4.3E-01
7.0E-02
1.2E+00
4.8E+01
8.2E-02
1.4E-01
1.5E-02
2.1E-01
NC
2.1E-02
3.8E-01
WA7
1.9%
l.OE+00
NC
1.6E-01
6.5E-02
1.3E-01
5.2E-02
3.0E-01
1.2E+01
2.0E-02
3.0E-02
8.5E-03
4.3E-02
NC
1.6E-02
3.0E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
6.4E-01
NC
4.0E-01
7.8E-02
1.4E-01
5.1E-02
9.0E-01
3.3E+01
1.3E-01
1.3E-02
1.1E-02
9.3E-02
NC
1.4E-02
2.9E-01
WA9
0.46%
5.4E-01
NC
5.3E-01
1.4E-01
3.5E-02
4.8E-02
1.8E-01
1.8E+01
3.1E-02
5.7E-03
6.7E-03
3.7E-02
NC
1.1E-02
1.3E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
8.8E-01
NC
1.6E+00
1.3E-01
5.6E+00
6.7E-02
3.2E+00
5.5E+01
4.4E-02
8.8E-01
1.4E-02
8.7E-01
NC
1.9E-02
3.6E-01
Utah
Bkg
4.9E+00
NC
9.1E-03
1.9E-01
NC
2.3E-01
2.7E-02
3.6E-01
1.7E-02
5.7E-03
1.7E-02
7.4E-03
NC
7.0E-02
3.0E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-6
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Big Brown Bat
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.5E+00
9.1E-01
2.7E+00
2.5E-02
1.8E-02
7.1E-03
3.1E-02
4.0E+00
6.8E-02
4.5E-04
7.8E-03
3.2E-02
2.3E-02
6.8E-02
5.6E-02
WA2
0.079%
3.7E+00
2.8E+01
2.3E+01
1.8E-02
1.1E+01
3.2E-02
8.3E+00
4.4E+01
7.3E-02
9.6E-03
1.8E-01
l.OE+01
5.6E-02
8.5E-02
1.4E+00
WA3
19%
7.5E+00
8.3E+00
8.5E+00
1.4E-02
l.OE+01
8.8E-03
1.4E-01
1.4E+01
5.0E-02
1.8E-01
2.5E-02
1.9E+00
7.2E-02
1.5E-01
1.7E-01
WA4
4.1%
6.2E+00
1.4E+01
2.8E+01
1.4E-01
1.2E-01
1.2E-02
7.1E-02
1.6E+01
3.3E-02
1.7E-02
1.9E-02
2.6E-01
7.5E-02
1.5E-01
1.9E-01
WAS
0.73%
1.8E+00
2.8E+00
2.2E+00
1.3E-02
2.5E-02
1.3E-03
4.4E-02
5.5E+00
3.3E-03
5.9E-03
7.2E-03
2.4E-01
8.0E-03
5.2E-02
5.0E-02
WA6
4.9%
7.8E+00
7.2E+00
2.2E+00
4.9E-02
2.9E-01
8.5E-03
1.2E-01
6.0E+00
1.6E-01
1.1E-02
2.3E-02
1.4E-01
5.5E-02
1.3E-01
1.2E-01
WA7
1.9%
6.6E+00
4.1E-01
5.1E-01
1.3E-02
8.6E-02
6.4E-03
2.9E-02
1.5E+00
3.8E-02
2.3E-03
1.3E-02
2.9E-02
3.9E-03
l.OE-01
9.4E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
4.1E+00
1.2E+00
1.3E+00
1.6E-02
9.5E-02
6.2E-03
8.6E-02
4.1E+00
2.5E-01
l.OE-03
1.7E-02
6.3E-02
3.1E-02
8.3E-02
9.0E-02
WA9
0.46%
3.5E+00
6.4E-01
1.7E+00
2.8E-02
2.4E-02
5.8E-03
1.7E-02
2.2E+00
5.8E-02
4.3E-04
l.OE-02
2.5E-02
1.4E-02
6.7E-02
4.0E-02
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
5.7E+00
6.3E+00
5.2E+00
2.7E-02
3.8E+00
8.2E-03
3.1E-01
6.8E+00
8.4E-02
6.6E-02
2.2E-02
5.9E-01
3.3E-02
1.2E-01
1.1E-01
Utah
Bkg
3.2E+01
6.7E-02
2.9E-02
3.9E-02
NC
2.8E-02
2.6E-03
4.5E-02
3.3E-02
4.3E-04
2.6E-02
5.0E-03
4.2E-02
4.3E-01
9.3E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-7
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Mallard
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA2
0.079%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA3
19%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA4
4.1%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS
0.73%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA6
4.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA7
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA9
0.46%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
Utah
Bkg
3.6E+00
NC
6.8E-03
1.4E-01
NC
1.7E-01
2.0E-02
2.7E-01
1.3E-02
4.3E-03
1.2E-02
5.5E-03
NC
5.2E-02
2.2E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
6/11/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-8
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR: | Northern Flicker |
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
7.2E-01
NC
1.6E+00
2.3E-01
4.8E-02
1.1E-01
6.2E-01
6.0E+01
6.8E-02
1.1E-02
9.5E-03
8.9E-02
NC
2.1E-02
3.4E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.1E+00
NC
1.3E+01
1.7E-01
2.9E+01
4.9E-01
1.6E+02
6.6E+02
7.3E-02
2.4E-01
2.2E-01
2.9E+01
NC
2.6E-02
8.5E+00
WA3
19%
2.2E+00
NC
5.0E+00
1.3E-01
2.8E+01
1.4E-01
2.8E+00
2.2E+02
5.0E-02
4.5E+00
3.0E-02
5.3E+00
NC
4.5E-02
l.OE+00
WA4
4.1%
1.8E+00
NC
1.6E+01
1.3E+00
3.4E-01
1.9E-01
1.4E+00
2.5E+02
3.3E-02
4.2E-01
2.3E-02
7.2E-01
NC
4.5E-02
1.2E+00
WAS
0.73%
5.3E-01
NC
1.3E+00
1.2E-01
6.9E-02
2.1E-02
8.6E-01
8.3E+01
3.3E-03
1.5E-01
8.8E-03
6.7E-01
NC
1.6E-02
3.0E-01
WA6
4.9%
2.3E+00
NC
1.3E+00
4.5E-01
8.1E-01
1.3E-01
2.3E+00
9.1E+01
1.6E-01
2.7E-01
2.8E-02
4.0E-01
NC
4.0E-02
7.2E-01
WA7
1.9%
1.9E+00
NC
3.0E-01
1.2E-01
2.4E-01
9.8E-02
5.7E-01
2.2E+01
3.8E-02
5.7E-02
1.6E-02
8.2E-02
NC
3.1E-02
5.7E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
1.2E+00
NC
7.6E-01
1.5E-01
2.6E-01
9.5E-02
1.7E+00
6.2E+01
2.5E-01
2.5E-02
2.1E-02
1.8E-01
NC
2.6E-02
5.4E-01
WA9
0.46%
l.OE+00
NC
l.OE+00
2.6E-01
6.7E-02
9.0E-02
3.4E-01
3.4E+01
5.8E-02
1.1E-02
1.3E-02
7.0E-02
NC
2.0E-02
2.4E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
1.7E+00
NC
3.0E+00
2.5E-01
1.1E+01
1.3E-01
6.1E+00
l.OE+02
8.4E-02
1.7E+00
2.7E-02
1.6E+00
NC
3.6E-02
6.8E-01
Utah
Bkg
9.2E+00
NC
1.7E-02
3.6E-01
NC
4.4E-01
5.1E-02
6.8E-01
3.3E-02
1.1E-02
3.1E-02
1.4E-02
NC
1.3E-01
5.6E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk Calcs_Type D-large HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-9
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
American Robin
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
9.7E-01
NC
2.1E+00
3.1E-01
6.5E-02
1.5E-01
8.3E-01
8.1E+01
9.2E-02
1.5E-02
1.3E-02
1.2E-01
NC
2.8E-02
4.6E-01
WA2
0.079%
1.5E+00
NC
1.8E+01
2.2E-01
4.0E+01
6.6E-01
2.2E+02
8.9E+02
9.8E-02
3.3E-01
3.0E-01
3.9E+01
NC
3.5E-02
1.2E+01
WA3
19%
4.6E+00
NC
1.1E+01
3.0E-01
1.1E+01
2.7E-01
8.6E+00
5.0E+02
1.3E-01
4.0E+00
6.3E-02
8.1E+00
NC
9.3E-02
3.2E+00
WA4
4.1%
5.3E+00
NC
4.7E+01
3.8E+00
8.9E+00
5.1E-01
4.4E+00
1.1E+03
9.8E-02
1.7E+00
6.6E-02
2.8E+00
NC
l.OE-01
3.4E+00
WAS
0.73%
7.2E-01
NC
1.7E+00
1.6E-01
9.3E-02
2.8E-02
1.2E+00
1.1E+02
4.4E-03
2.0E-01
1.2E-02
9.1E-01
NC
2.1E-02
4.1E-01
WA6
4.9%
6.4E+00
NC
3.5E+00
1.3E+00
2.8E+00
2.9E-01
7.4E+00
2.7E+02
5.1E-01
9.0E-01
6.8E-02
1.3E+00
NC
8.4E-02
2.4E+00
WA7
1.9%
2.6E+00
NC
4.1E-01
1.7E-01
3.2E-01
1.3E-01
7.8E-01
3.0E+01
5.1E-02
7.8E-02
2.2E-02
1.1E-01
NC
4.2E-02
7.7E-01
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
3.0E+00
NC
2.5E+00
4.5E-01
7.0E-01
2.1E-01
5.3E+00
1.8E+02
5.8E-01
7.7E-02
5.5E-02
4.7E-01
NC
5.4E-02
1.7E+00
WA9
0.46%
7.7E+00
NC
9.5E+00
6.9E-01
8.3E-01
4.1E-01
l.OE+00
2.9E+02
7.2E-01
4.1E-02
4.3E-02
2.1E-01
NC
7.1E-02
1.8E+00
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
4.2E+00
NC
7.0E+00
6.2E-01
3.7E+00
2.9E-01
5.9E+00
3.0E+02
1.8E-01
8.2E-01
6.5E-02
2.5E+00
NC
7.8E-02
1.9E+00
Utah
Bkg
2.4E+01
NC
4.5E-02
9.4E-01
NC
1.1E+00
1.3E-01
1.1E+00
8.4E-02
8.8E-03
7.5E-02
3.5E-02
NC
3.4E-01
7.7E-02
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType D-small HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-10
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Masked Shrew
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
2.8E+01
l.OE+01
3.1E+01
2.9E-01
2.0E-01
8.2E-02
3.6E-01
4.5E+01
7.8E-01
5.2E-03
8.9E-02
3.7E-01
2.6E-01
7.9E-01
6.4E-01
WA2
0.079%
4.3E+01
3.2E+02
2.6E+02
2.1E-01
1.2E+02
3.6E-01
9.5E+01
5.0E+02
8.4E-01
1.1E-01
2.1E+00
1.2E+02
6.4E-01
9.8E-01
1.6E+01
WA3
19%
1.3E+02
1.6E+02
1.5E+02
2.8E-01
3.5E+01
1.5E-01
3.7E+00
2.8E+02
1.1E+00
1.3E+00
4.4E-01
2.5E+01
1.4E+00
2.6E+00
4.5E+00
WA4
4.1%
1.5E+02
1.3E+03
6.8E+02
3.5E+00
2.7E+01
2.8E-01
1.9E+00
6.3E+02
8.3E-01
5.8E-01
4.6E-01
8.5E+00
1.9E+00
2.8E+00
4.8E+00
WAS
0.73%
2.1E+01
3.2E+01
2.5E+01
1.5E-01
2.9E-01
1.5E-02
5.0E-01
6.3E+01
3.8E-02
6.7E-02
8.2E-02
2.8E+00
9.2E-02
5.9E-01
5.7E-01
WA6
4.9%
1.8E+02
2.3E+02
5.1E+01
1.2E+00
8.6E+00
1.6E-01
3.2E+00
1.5E+02
4.3E+00
3.0E-01
4.7E-01
4.0E+00
2.9E+00
2.3E+00
3.3E+00
WA7
1.9%
7.6E+01
4.7E+00
5.9E+00
1.5E-01
9.9E-01
7.3E-02
3.4E-01
1.7E+01
4.4E-01
2.6E-02
1.5E-01
3.4E-01
4.4E-02
1.2E+00
1.1E+00
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
8.8E+01
4.2E+01
3.6E+01
4.1E-01
2.2E+00
1.2E-01
2.3E+00
9.8E+01
5.0E+00
2.6E-02
3.8E-01
1.4E+00
8.2E-01
1.5E+00
2.3E+00
WA9
0.46%
2.2E+02
1.6E+01
1.4E+02
6.3E-01
2.6E+00
2.3E-01
4.4E-01
1.6E+02
6.1E+00
1.4E-02
3.0E-01
6.4E-01
5.1E-01
2.0E+00
2.5E+00
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
1.2E+02
1.1E+02
l.OE+02
5.7E-01
1.2E+01
1.6E-01
2.5E+00
1.7E+02
1.5E+00
2.8E-01
4.5E-01
7.6E+00
8.1E-01
2.2E+00
2.7E+00
Utah
Bkg
6.8E+02
9.2E-01
6.5E-01
8.6E-01
NC
5.9E-01
5.6E-02
6.4E-01
7.1E-01
3.0E-03
5.2E-01
1.1E-01
7.7E-01
9.4E+00
1.1E-01
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType D-small HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX J: Table D-ll
HQ TYPE D: Estimated Risks in AOCs to Wildlife Receptors from Incidental Ingestion of Soil
RECEPTOR:
Deer Mouse
Exposure Area
%ofWA =AOC:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
WAI
0.0052%
1.2E+00
4.6E-01
1.3E+00
1.3E-02
8.8E-03
3.6E-03
1.6E-02
2.0E+00
3.4E-02
2.3E-04
3.9E-03
1.6E-02
1.2E-02
3.4E-02
2.8E-02
WA2
0.079%
1.9E+00
1.4E+01
1.1E+01
9.0E-03
5.4E+00
1.6E-02
4.1E+00
2.2E+01
3.7E-02
4.8E-03
9.2E-02
5.1E+00
2.8E-02
4.3E-02
7.1E-01
WA3
19%
5.8E+00
6.9E+00
6.7E+00
1.2E-02
1.5E+00
6.4E-03
1.6E-01
1.2E+01
4.8E-02
5.8E-02
1.9E-02
1.1E+00
6.0E-02
1.1E-01
1.9E-01
WA4
4.1%
6.7E+00
5.5E+01
3.0E+01
1.5E-01
1.2E+00
1.2E-02
8.3E-02
2.8E+01
3.6E-02
2.5E-02
2.0E-02
3.7E-01
8.3E-02
1.2E-01
2.1E-01
WAS
0.73%
9.1E-01
1.4E+00
1.1E+00
6.4E-03
1.3E-02
6.7E-04
2.2E-02
2.7E+00
1.6E-03
2.9E-03
3.6E-03
1.2E-01
4.0E-03
2.6E-02
2.5E-02
WA6
4.9%
8.1E+00
l.OE+01
2.2E+00
5.4E-02
3.8E-01
6.9E-03
1.4E-01
6.7E+00
.9E-01
.3E-02
2.1E-02
.8E-01
.3E-01
.OE-01
.4E-01
WA7
1.9%
3.3E+00
2.1E-01
2.6E-01
6.7E-03
4.3E-02
3.2E-03
1.5E-02
7.4E-01
1.9E-02
1.1E-03
6.7E-03
1.5E-02
1.9E-03
5.1E-02
4.7E-02
WAS/
WA11
0.94%
3.8E+00
1.8E+00
1.6E+00
1.8E-02
9.5E-02
5.1E-03
9.9E-02
4.3E+00
2.2E-01
1.1E-03
1.7E-02
6.3E-02
3.6E-02
6.6E-02
l.OE-01
WA9
0.46%
9.8E+00
7.2E-01
6.0E+00
2.8E-02
1.1E-01
9.9E-03
1.9E-02
7.1E+00
2.7E-01
6.0E-04
1.3E-02
2.8E-02
2.2E-02
8.6E-02
1.1E-01
WA10
-
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
All Work
Areas
1.9%
5.3E+00
4.9E+00
4.5E+00
2.5E-02
5.0E-01
6.9E-03
1.1E-01
7.3E+00
6.7E-02
1.2E-02
2.0E-02
3.3E-01
3.6E-02
9.5E-02
1.2E-01
Utah
Bkg
3.0E+01
4.0E-02
2.8E-02
3.8E-02
NC
2.6E-02
2.4E-03
2.8E-02
3.1E-02
1.3E-04
2.3E-02
4.6E-03
3.4E-02
4.1E-01
4.7E-03
NC = Not Calculated; TRV not available, exposure pathway not evaluated, or concentration data not available
Wildlife Risk CalcsJType D-small HR.xls: HQ-AOC
11/18/2004
Page 1 of 1
------- |