United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
EPA/540/R-00/504
December 2000
The Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program
Annual Report to Congress
FY 1999
-------
EPA/540/R-00/504
December 2000
The Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program
Annual Report to Congress
FY1999
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
-------
Notice
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development
partially funded and collaborated in the research described here under contract 68-C5-003 7 to Tetra Tech
EMI and 68-C5-0036 to Science Applications International Corporation. It has been subjected to the
Agency' s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for
use.
-------
Foreword
TheU.S. Environmental Protection Agency is chargedby Congress with protecting the Nation's
land, air, and water resources.iii Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency strives to
formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability
of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's research program is providing
data and technical support for solving environmental problems today and building a science knowledge
base necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our health,
and prevent or reduce environmental risks in the future.
The National RiskManagementResearchLaboratory is the Agency's center for investigation of
technological and management approaches for reducing risks from threats to human health and the
environment. The focus of the Laboratory's research program is on methods for the prevention and
control of pollution to air, land, water and subsurface resources; protection of water quality in public water
systems; remediation of contaminated sites and ground water; and prevention and control of indoor air
pollution. The goal of this research effort is to catalyze development and implementation of innovative,
cost-effective environmental technologies; develop scientific and engineering information needed by EPA
to support regulatory and policy decisions; and provide technical support and information transfer to
ensure effective implementation of environmental regulations and strategies.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory' s strategic long-term research plan.
It is published and made available by EPA's Office of Research and Development to assist the user
community and to link researchers with their clients.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
in
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
IV
-------
Contents
Foreword iii
Executive Summary vii
SITE Program Description 1
Introduction 1
Program Design 2
Program Implementation 2
Program Principles 2
FY 99 SITE Program Cost Savings and Vendor Benefits 7
Promotion of Innovative Technologies 7
Historical Program Cost Savings and Vendor Contracting 7
Innovative Technology Highlights 13
SITE Program Case Studies 13
Case Study 1: Sandia National Laboratory 13
Case Study 2: ITT Night Vision 14
Case Study 3: Duke Engineering and Services, Inc 14
Case Study 4: MMT Program - Sediment Sampling Technologies 15
FY 99 Progress and Accomplishments 17
Demonstration Program 17
Emerging Technology Program 18
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies (MMT) Program 18
Future Direction 24
Introduction 24
Demonstration Program Areas of Interest 24
MMT Program Areas of Interest 26
Partnerships for Success 27
Information Transfer 28
Appendices
Appendix A - SITE Projects (Alphabetically by Developer State)
Appendix B - SITE Technology Demonstration Sites (Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
Appendix C - Publications - Information Transfer Product Descriptions
Appendix D - Electronic Technical Information Resources
v
-------
Figures
Figure Page
1 Location of SITE Demonstration and MMT Projects 1
2 Treatment technologies for source control chosen in Records of Decision (RODs) 8
3 Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type 9
4 Number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation 10
5 Total number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation 11
6 Share of 3,229 total contracts awarded to SITE vendors by technology type 12
7 Distribution of in situ and ex situ SITE Demonstration projects at the end of FY 99 18
8 DNAPL testing site roadmap: media 25
Tables
Table Page
1 SITE Demonstration projects completed in FY 99 19
2 SITE Demonstration ongoing projects in FY 99 20
3 SITE MMT Program demonstrations completed in FY 99 23
4 SITE future emphasis areas 2000-2004 26
5 SITE Program projects in FY 00 26
VI
-------
Executive Summary
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program has successfully promoted the
development, commercialization and implementation of innovative hazardous waste treatmenttechnologies
for more than 14 years. SITE offers a mechanism for conducting joint technology demonstration and
evaluation proj ects at hazardous waste sites involving the private sector, EPA, and other federal and state
agencies. The program provides environmental decision-makers with relevant data on new, viable
remediation technologies that may have performance or cost advantages compared to conventional
treatmenttechnologies. Since the initiation of the SITE Program in 1986, cleanup of contaminated sites
through the use of innovative technologies has resulted in a total inflated cost savings of over 2.1 billion
dollars.
During fiscal year (FY) 96, the SITE Program reviewed its approach to doing business and
determined that operational shifts in the program were necessary to identify and assist in the development
of the most sought-aftertechnology types and treatment methods. Building on the strengths ofthe existing
program, such as demonstration design, quality assurance, and technology transfer, the SITE Program has
established a remediation problem focus that is driven by the needs ofthe hazardous waste remediation
community. The SITE Program has the following four operating functions: (1) program planning, (2)
matching priority sites with innovative cleanup solutions, (3) technology field demonstrations, and (4)
information dissemination. The SITE Program's vision is to remain the premiere organization in
enhancing the credibility and implementation of effective innovative remediation options.
The SITE Program continues to earn increased recognition as a leader in advancing innovative
technology development and commercialization. The program is participating with 128 remediation
technology vendors. ThroughFY99, the SITE Program has successfully demonstrated 108 technologies,
seven of which were demonstrated during FY 99. Emphasis formerly placed on technologies requiring
the removal of soil or groundwater (ex situ) is gravitating to in situ technologies that treat contamination
in place. The SITE Program recognized this change and has emphasized the development of in situ
technologies. Ofthe 22 ongoing or planned demonstrations, 13 are in situ, while 9 are ex situ. SITE'S
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies (MMT) Program has completed 3 8 proj ects to date, with 9
more in the planning stages.
To ensure that the program continues to meet the needs ofthe remediation community, the SITE
Program established a remediation stakeholder group. This group, which is composed of such agencies
as the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy, reviews innovative technology applications
and develops an environmental emphasis area list, which ensures that the most pressing issues are
prioritized and addressed. An example of multi-agency cooperation is the Cape Canaveral Demonstration
Project. This project will evaluate the effectiveness of three in situ remediation technologies for
remediation of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) in the subsurface. SITE'S MMT Program is also
addressing issues in the remediation community, and has identified a need for more effective methods to
vii
-------
evaluate sediment and soil contamination. In response to this need, the MMT Program conducted
demonstrations of two innovative sediment sampling technologies inFY99. The MMT Program is now
addressing a similarly difficultproblem in evaluating the performance of fieldtotal petroleum hydrocarbon
(TPH)analysistechnologies. Through such relationships with other interested parties, the SITE Program
continually pursues opportunities to conduct cooperative technology demonstrations, thereby reducing
expenditures and further promoting innovative technologies. These factors assist the SITE Program in
attaining its primary goal - the expedited cleanup of the nation's most contaminated sites.
Vlll
-------
SITE Program Description
Introduction
The Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program has successfully
promoted the development, commercialization, and
implementation of innovative hazardous waste site
remediation and characterization technologies for
more than 14 years. The SITE Program is
currently composed of a Demonstration Program,
a Monitoring and Measurement Technology
(MMT) Program, and information transfer. Figure
1 below shows the locations of completed SITE
projects for both the Demonstration and MMT
Programs. The SITE Program formerly supported
an Emerging Technologies (ET) Program, but this
role has been taken over by other government
programs such as the Small Business Innovation
Research (SBIR) Program. SITE offers a
mechanism for conducting joint technology
demonstration and evaluation proj ects at hazardous
waste sites through the involvement of the private
sector, EPA, and other federal and state agencies.
Commercialization of innovative technologies is
assisted by providing potential users with high
quality, unbiased, defendable performance and
cost data. SITE promotes commercial application
of innovative technologies through an extensive
technology transfer program. This section will
describe each component of SITE, and the overall
program principles used for planning and guidance
of the Program.
Figure 1 Location of all completed SITE Demonstration () and MMT ( ) Projects (EPA Regions
shown in circles).
1
-------
Program Design
The SITE Program is currently comprised
of the following key elements:
Demonstration Program
Evaluates and verifies cost and performance
of promising innovative technologies at
selected hazardous waste sites to provide
reliable performance, cost, and applicability
information for site cleanup decision-
making
Monitoring and Measurement
Technology Program
Evaluates technologies that detect, monitor,
and measure hazardous and toxic
substances to provide more cost-effective
and accurate methods for producing real-
time data during site characterization and
remediation
Information Transfer Activities
Disseminates technical information,
including engineering, performance, and
cost data, to assist in removing barriers for
use of innovative and alternative
technologies
Program Implementation
SITE is a partnership between the public
and private sectors, where the costs and
responsibilities are shared by EPA, hazardous
waste site owners, and technology developers.
EPA enters into cooperative arrangements with site
owners and technology developers, under which
innovative technologies are demonstrated at
selected hazardous waste sites. EPA evaluates the
new technologies based on the demonstration
results, and compiles and publishes rigorous
engineering, performance, and cost data intended
to aid in decisions regarding the use of the
technologies at other hazardous waste sites. The
program generates credible and unbiased
technology cost and performance data needed by
remedial project managers, consultants, and other
environmental decision makers. EPA promotes
Monitoring and
Measurement
Program
SITE PROGRAM
easy and rapid access to this information, allowing
project managers to make timely decisions in
selecting cleanup remedies.
Historically, one of the greatest factors
inhibiting the development and use of innovative
cleanup technologies has been the lack of credible
cost and performance data during technology
development at the commercial scale.
Understandably, many site owners are unwilling to
risk the use of innovative technologies without
assurance of success. By addressing this need,
SITE has aided in the first-time field use of many
technologies, contributing to wider acceptance of
a particular technology. Providing this credible,
unbiased cost and performance data remains the
foundation of SITE.
The foundation of the SITE Program is
providing credible cost and performance
data.
Program Principles
To reduce expenditures and to remain at
the forefront of innovative technology
development, the SITE Program reviewed its
approach to doing business in fiscal year (FY)
1996. The review indicated that operational shifts
in the program were necessary to more efficiently
identify and assist in the development of the most
sought after technology types and treatment
methods. Building on the strengths of the existing
-------
program, such as demonstration design, quality
assurance, and technology transfer, the SITE
Program shifted in FY 97 from a technology-
driven focus to a remediation problem focus,
driven by the needs of the hazardous waste
remediation community. EPA's vision of the SITE
Program is to remain the premiere program for
enhancing the credibility and implementation of
effective innovative remediation options.
In FY 99, the program continued to focus
on cost-effective solutions to common remediation
problems. The success of the program's focus is
illustrated in the strong response to solicitations for
technologies, and the great interest in resource
leveraging with the SITE Program from federal
and state agencies, such as the Department of
Defense (DOD), Department of Energy (DOE),
and State Environmental Protection Agencies.
The SITE Program is defined by the
following four operating principles: (1) program
planning, (2) matching priority sites with
innovative cleanup solutions, (3) technology field
demonstrations, and (4) information dissemination.
Demonstration Program
In the Demonstration Program, innovative
cleanup technologies are field tested on hazardous
waste materials. SITE demonstrations are
conducted at hazardous waste sites, such as those
on the National Priorities List (NPL); Brownfields
at non-NPL sites; or under simulated hazardous
waste site conditions at developer or federal test
and evaluation facilities. Engineering,
performance, and cost data are gathered on
innovative technologies. The data are then
reviewed by potential users to evaluate
applicability to similar waste sites or to compare
effectiveness and costs to other alternatives. Data
collected during each field demonstration are used
to assess the performance of the technology, the
potential need for pre- or post-processing of the
waste, applicable types of wastes and contaminated
media (for example, soil, sludge, water, sediment),
potential operating problems, limitations, and
approximate capital, operating, and maintenance
costs.
The SITE Program annually solicits
applications for participation in the Demonstration
Program from interested private firms and federal
and state agencies with responsibility for cleanup
operations at hazardous waste sites. Cooperative
arrangements or Memoranda of Understanding
form the relationship between the SITE Program
and the parties responsible for the host site. No
contractual agreement is arranged and no funds are
given to the site as part of this arrangement. SITE
provides in-kind service in the form of project
planning, testing, sampling/analytical services,
evaluation data analysis, and report writing.
Host site owners (see Appendix B for sites
categorized by state and location) are responsible
for providing necessary data related to the
hydrogeology and other site conditions, results of
feasibility studies, and results of waste analyses.
The owner is responsible for all logistical
requirements for the demonstration, such as
availability of utilities, access to land area at the
site large enough for equipment setup, elimination
or restriction of geographical or geological
hindrances, security provisions, and personnel
safety provisions. Technology developers whose
systems are demonstrated are responsible for
transporting equipment to the selected site,
operating their systems, and removing equipment
from the site upon completion of the
demonstration. EPA is financially and
technically responsible for project planning,
sampling and analysis, quality assurance and
quality control, preparing evaluation reports, and
disseminating cost and performance information to
environmental managers. EPA also prepares
evaluation reports, bulletins, project summaries,
and videotapes to document demonstration
activities. These reports and videotapes evaluate
available information on the technology and
analyze its overall applicability to other site
characteristics, waste types, and waste matrices.
Reports also include rigorous testing procedures
and the quality assurance and quality control
standards.
As of September 30, 1999, the
Demonstration Program included 132 accepted,
ongoing, and completed demonstrations. These
technologies are presented alphabetically in
-------
Appendix A, according to the state in which the
developer's business is located.
Monitoring and Measurement Technology
Program
The MMT Program provides developers of
innovative hazardous waste measurement and
monitoring technologies with an opportunity to
demonstrate a technology's performance under
actual field conditions. Following the
demonstration, EPA compiles the results and
prepares a report summarizing the findings.
Distribution of technical reports enhances market
acceptance and can define new applications for the
technology.
The purpose of the MMT Program is to
accelerate the acceptance and use of effective
innovative measurement and monitoring
technologies in the field. These technologies
include new or modified technologies that can
detect, monitor, and measure hazardous and toxic
substances in the subsurface, soil, sediment, waste
materials, and surface waters. Technologies tested
in the program include chemical sensors for in situ
measurements, groundwater sampling devices, soil
and core sampling devices, soil gas or fluid
samplers, laboratory and field-portable analytical
equipment, and other systems that support field
sampling or data acquisition and analysis. The
primary objectives of this portion of the SITE
program are to:
Test field analytical technologies that
enhance monitoring and site
characterization capabilities
Identify performance attributes of new
technologies addressing field
characterization and monitoring problems
more cost-effectively and efficiently
Prepare protocols, guidelines, and methods
that enhance the acceptance of these
technologies for routine use
MMT Program technologies can be used
to accurately assess the degree of contamination at
a site, provide data to evaluate potential effects on
human health and the environment, supply data to
assist in selecting the most appropriate cleanup
action, and monitor the effectiveness of a
remediation technology. The selection process
places high priority on technologies that provide
more cost-effective, faster, and safer methods than
conventional technologies for producing real-time
or near-real-time data. Innovative technologies are
demonstrated under field conditions and results are
compiled, evaluated, published, and disseminated
by the Office of Research and Development
(ORD).
Evaluations or demonstrations have now
been completed for 38 technologies in the MMT
Program. The MMT Program is administered by
ORD'S National Exposure Research Laboratory
at the Environmental Sciences Division in Las
Vegas, Nevada. Technologies demonstrated
under the MMT Program are listed in Appendix
A.
Emerging Technology Program (ETP)
Support of the ETP ended in FY 98, after
completion of all committed projects in the
program. The purpose of ETP was to foster
research and development of innovative
technologies for remediation of Superfund and
other hazardous waste sites. Technologies entered
the program at the bench- or pilot-scale stage of
development. EPA provided developers the
opportunity to advance a technology from bench-
and pilot-scale testing to demonstration.
Addition of new projects within ETP was
discontinued in 1996 due to reductions in funding
to the Superfund research and development
budget, and recognition of overlap with other
initiatives such as the SBIR Program. Upon
completion of the ETP, technologies were
considered for the SITE Demonstration Program,
although many vendors chose to fully
commercialize theirtechnologies after participating
in the program.
Program Planning
To ensure that the SITE Program continues
to focus on validating the most sought- after
remediation technologies, overall program
direction and strategies are now evaluated each
-------
year based on input from the user community and
other private- and public-sector stakeholders. As
part of the overall program planning process, the
SITE Program is developing and will implement a
quality management plan based on American
National Standard Institute, Specifications and
Guidelines for Quality Assistance for
Environmental Data Collection and Environmental
Technology Programs (ANSI/ASQC E4). This
plan will enable the program to focus more clearly
on long-term quality assurance and planning issues
that impact overall program performance.
Matching Priority Sites with Innovative Cleanup
Solutions
The SITE Program solicits and prioritizes
hazardous waste sites, and then seeks appropriate
technologies for demonstration at these sites.
Priority sites are selected based on feedback from
the user community, including federal and state
agencies. Matching a site with a technology is a
flexible process, and a site owner has the option of
evaluating multiple technologies. If no specific
technology or vendor is identified by a site,
technologies and vendors are matched by the SITE
Program and other interested parties, which may
include state and federal regulators and other
public representatives.
The selection of sites for the program is
based on the research needs of EPA, as well
as federal and state agencies.
An important aspect of technology
selection is that more than one technology may
be introduced for review and demonstration. This
aspect allows for matching the most appropriate
and feasible technology to a particular site.
General technology needs of the user community
are identified by soliciting input from working
groups, forums, personal communication, and
hazardous waste publications. With this
continuous input, the SITE Program will continue
to focus on the needs of the remediation
community and the more pressing problems at
contaminated sites.
Technology Field Demonstrations
Field demonstrations are conducted to
provide quality data to evaluate technology
performance. Project planning is an integral part
of the demonstration process, and ensures that
quality assurance/control and statistical analysis
issues have been addressed in advance of initiating
a demonstration. The resulting data and reports
are intended for use by the site owners and state
and federal decision-makers in evaluating
remediation options and for adding credibility to
technology vendors promoting their processes.
SITE Program technology demonstrations
are increasingly conducted in partnership with
other EPA offices, other federal agencies, states,
private industry, and universities. These
partnerships not only reduce the overall costs of
demonstrations to EPA, but accelerate remediation
of some of the most problematic sites at federal
and state facilities. One example of interagency
partnerships is the DNAPL Consortium, consisting
of DOE, DOD, EPA, the Air Force (USAF), and
the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA). This group is currently
working on a demonstration evaluating three
technologies used to remediate DNAPL at the
Cape Canaveral Air Station.
Information Dissemination
As part of its continuing improvement
process, the SITE Program recognized the need
for expediting the progression of demonstration
data from the program to the user community. The
expansion of its electronic information sources was
identified by the SITE Program as the most
effective means for accomplishing this task. As a
result, the amount of information on innovative
technologies available through electronic sources
is growing rapidly, with the World Wide Web as
the primary conduit.
Electronic documents are accessible
through the World Wide Web at the
Environmental Technologies Verification (ETV)
Web site (http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE) and a
site supported by the EPA Office of Solid Waste
-------
and Emergency Response Technology Innovation
Office (TIO) (http://clu-in.org). Several
technology databases summarize information about
innovative treatment technologies and associated
vendors. These databases may serve as tools in
identifying potential technology demonstration
candidates or serve as directories for technology
vendors. Examples of these databases include, but
are not limited to, Remediation and
Characterization Innovative Technologies
(REACHIT) online system (http://epareachit.org),
and the Bioremediation in the Field Search System
(BFSS, http://www.epa.gov). Descriptions of the
databases and publication ordering information are
provided in Appendix D.
The development of technical documents
within the SITE Program is a dynamic process,
with a continual drive towards presenting data in
its most usable form. The primary products of
these efforts are information documents on a
variety of technologies or applications for a
specific area of interest. For example, SITE is
currently developing a summary documentation
and cost model for innovative remediation
technology performance and cost information for
wood preserving sites. This information allows the
user community to compare the technical
capabilities of these technologies, expected cost for
the application, and the compliance of the
technology with regulatory guidelines.
The SITE Program aggressively pursues
opportunities for direct interaction with the user
community and technology developers to
anticipate needs and emphasis areas for
development of future innovative technologies.
Meetings and conferences continue to be an
important factor in the dissemination of technical
information generated by the SITE Program and
were utilized to their full potential during FY 99.
The SITE Program provided a booth and
representation at 16 conferences in FY 99, with
staffing to provide information, documentation,
and guidance to conference participants interested
in the program. These forums offer face-to-face
discussion among the user community, technology
developers, and the SITE Program, serving to
generate ideas for future development and use of
innovative technologies. The following
mechanisms are used by the SITE Program to
disseminate information and increase interaction
with the user community:
Program-specific brochures and exhibits
Conferences, workshops, and technical
working groups
Publications and videotapes (see Appendix
C)
Electronic media, including the Internet
and electronic bulletin boards
Technical assistance to regions, states, and
remediation contractors
Technology seminars
-------
FY 99 SITE Program Cost Savings and Vendor Benefits
Promotion of Innovative Technologies
SITE is recognized by EPA as one of its
principal programs to advance innovative site
monitoring, characterization, and cleanup
technologies with the potential to treat hazardous
wastes more efficiently, less expensively, and
more safely than existing methods. SITE's mission
is to promote the development and application of
innovative technologies that reduce or eliminate
risks to human health and the environment due to
contamination. The goal of the program is to
interact with the technology user community,
understand its needs, integrate those needs with
EPA's research mission, and expeditiously address
those needs. Identifying and responding to the
technology needs of the remediation community is
the driving force behind today's SITE Program.
Responding to technology needs is the
driving force behind the SITE Program.
The need for credible and reliable data for
innovative technologies remains significant. For
example, of the 80 RODs signed in 1994 that
selected established technologies as the best
alternative, 16 (or 20 percent) considered an
innovative technology as an alternative for
remediation of the site. The majority of the RODs
indicated that innovative technologies were not
chosen due to a lack of verified performance and
implementability. The SITE Program serves to fill
this need for credible evaluations so that more
effective, cost-efficient methods can be used on
remediation problems.
During the first 10 years of the SITE
Program, an emphasis was placed on innovative
technologies for permanent treatment that usually
required the removal of soil or groundwater. Most
field demonstrations during this period in the
program's history involved ex situ
physical/chemical and thermal technologies that
could be field tested in a matter of days or weeks.
The need for innovative, in situ technologies that
are more cost-effective, result in less secondary
waste, and are less intrusive will continue to
increase. The SITE Program has recognized this
need and has emphasized the development of in
situ technologies.
Historical Program Cost Savings and Vendor
Contracting
Since its establishment in 1986, the SITE
Program has assisted in the development and use
of innovative technologies, resulting in substantial
cost savings for cleaning up contaminated sites.
The cost savings realized by federal facilities has
been estimated by analysis of RODs from 1993 -
1998; this analysis is described below. The SITE
Program has also assisted vendors in advancing
innovative technologies from the development
phase to full-
scale application, and has promoted greater
acceptance of these technologies. The following
subsections provide examples of the financial
success of the SITE Program in terms of federal
cost savings, and vendor successes.
-------
92 93 94 95 96 97
82
90 91
Fiscal Year
Figure 2 Treatment technologies for source control chosen in RODs. Sites selecting no further
action,
monitoring, institutional controls, and natural attenuation are not included in totals.
(Adapted from: U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Innovative Treatment Technologies
Annual Status Report, Eighth Edition (EPA/542/r-96/010) & Ninth Edition (S42-R-99-001).
SITE Program Accomplishments - Federal Cost
Savings from RODs Analysis
Figure 2 displays the number of innovative
and established treatment technologies selected in
RODs by year. This figure shows that interest in
innovative technologies as a sound remediation
action increased in the late 1980s. Since 1993, the
use of innovative technologies has outpaced that of
established technologies, resulting in dramatic cost
savings.
During 1996 and 1999, the SITE Program
collected information from signed RODs (dated
1993-1998) in all 10 EPA Regions that selected an
innovative technology as the remedy. These
technologies include thermal desorption,
bioremediation, phytoremediation, surfactant
flooding, and many other technologies that have
passed through the Program. The data compiled
by the SITE Program allowed environmental
managers to compare innovative technologies to
conventional technologies, especially with respect
to cost. This time period was selected for
evaluation because more innovative technologies
than conventional technologies were selected in
RODs signed in each of these years.
Documentation was obtained from updated data
on a total of 168 RODs that selected innovative
technologies for part or all of the remediation.
EPA guidance recommends that ROD estimates
assess remedial alternatives with an accuracy of
+50 percent to -30 percent. Of the 168 RODs that
selected innovative technologies, 84 had sufficient
information to make a cost comparison between
the selected technology and a conventional
technology. Cost savings realized by using
innovative technologies for the 84 RODs was
estimated at $2.3 billion in 1999 dollars, with an
average percent savings per site of over 70
percent. Only 11 of the 84 RODs reported that the
innovative technology was more expensive than or
equal to the established technology.
-------
To estimate SITE Program net benefits, the
FY 93-98 RODs and the SITE Program budget
were inflated to the end of 1999 using Consumer
Price Index (CPI) inflation figures. The total
inflated cost savings for RODs dated 1993-1998
was $2.3 billion, and the total inflated SITE
Program budget from 1986-1999 was $175
million. This comparison represents an estimated
inflated cost savings of over $2.1 billion for
various site cleanups.
Figure 3 shows a breakdown of savings by
technology type. Soil vapor extraction (SVE)
showed the highest savings of over $1.0 billion,
followed by $500 million for bioremediation.
SVE was one of the initial technologies accepted
into the SITE Program (in the late 1980s), and
large savings would therefore be expected from
this technology. Solvent extraction, thermal
desorption, and vitrification each accounted for
over $100 million in savings. Phytoremediation is
a newer technology that is beginning to be chosen
in RODs, with four sites having specified the use
of phytoremediation, with an associated cost
savings of $17 million dollars as compared to
conventional technologies. The number of sites
and associated costs savings for phytoremediation
and treatment barrier sites are expected to increase
rapidly in coming years.
Historical Vendor Benefits
Technology vendors are a central part of
the SITE Program, providing remediation services
for sites requiring clean-up solutions. Vendors
experience various benefits by participating in the
SITE Program, namely increased exposure,
market share, technical acceptance, and
recognition. Increased acceptance of innovative
technologies is demonstrated by the level of
commercial activity experienced by SITE Program
vendors. For example, 1999 information indicated
that since completing SITE demonstration
projects, vendors received 1,921 remediation
contracts, and 1,308 treatability studies (Figure 4).
As part of a SITE Program evaluation in 1999, 43
Treatment Barrier
4 sites ($57)
Solvent Extraction -
2 sites ($123)
Vitrification -
2 sites ($161)
Air Sparging -
6 sites ($17)
Phytoremediation
4 sites ($17)
Others -
sites ($259)
Soil Vapor Extraction -
30 sites ($1,012)
Thermal Desorption -
14 sites ($149)
Bioremediation -
24 sites ($500)
Figure 3 Cost savings estimated from RODs analysis by technology type (millions of 1999
dollars). Savings estimated based on comparison of innovative to conventional
technologies for FY 93-98.
-------
0
(J
0
Treatability Studies
Remediation Jobs
International Contracts
Figure 4 Number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation
(Source: 1999 vendor information)
Demonstration Program vendors provided
information regarding company revenues after
completion of their demonstration. Following
participation in the SITE Program, 58 percent of
vendors were awarded commercial remediation
jobs using technologies demonstrated in the SITE
Program. Thirty-three percent of the vendors were
awarded more than 10 contracts each. Over 35
percent of the SITE vendors reported one or more
international contracts, identifying 37 countries
where jobs were contracted. Figure 5 provides a
historical perspective of growth in the number of
contracts awarded to SITE vendors since 1990.
The 1999 Demonstration Program vendor
information has been broken down by technology
type to ascertain which technologies demonstrated
the greatest commercial success. Figure 6 shows
the share by technology type of the 3,229
remediation and treatability contracts awarded to
vendors. It is clear from this chart that soil vapor
extraction and bioremediation technologies have
had the most commercial success. This trend from
the vendor information is consistent with the
RODs analysis results which are shown in Figure
2, providing two sources of data to confirm the
outstanding commercial success of these
technologies.
In addition to the 43 Demonstration
Program vendors, information was obtained in
1999 from 14 vendors that participated in the
MMT Program. This information clearly
demonstrated the benefits that vendors receive
from the program, indicating that 71 percent of the
vendors sold more than 25 units since their
demonstration in the SITE Program. Over 64
percent of the vendors indicated that their
technologies were used on international
remediation projects. In total, the MMT vendors
reported selling over 3,550 units on over 900 jobs,
including 48 international jobs.
Overall, vendor information shows that
SITE technology developers in the Demonstration
and MMT Programs are achieving commercial
success for demonstrated technologies. The
impact of the SITE Program continues to grow
over time, as illustrated by the consistent growth in
vendor contracts over the last decade (Figure 5).
10
-------
There is also a clear connection between the
commercial success of particular remediation
technology types (that is, SVE and
bioremediation) as measured from vendor
information (Figure 6), and the cost savings
determined from the RODs analysis (Figure 3).
Therefore, those technologies in the SITE
Program
that succeed commercially can be seen to provide
economic savings for federal facilities in terms of
cost saving from ROD estimates.
3500 .
3000 .
2500 .
Vi
It
< 2000 .
V
ft
*
^ 1500 .
~
e
h
1000 .
500 .
0 .
150
I h
December 1 990 Oc
225
1
410
I
3229
2874
1895
533
n
tober 1991 March 1992 June 1994 June 1996 June 1998 March 2000
Figure 5 Total number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation (Source:
1990 - 1999 vendor information)
11
-------
Soil Washing
2 /o
Vitrification I Other
Stabilization /
Solidification
Solvent
Extraction
Oxidation
Electro-chemical
1 %
Chemical
Treatm ent
1 0%
Thermal Desorption
2%
Soil Vapor
Extraction
2 9 %
iorem ediation
Figure 6 Share of 3,229 total contracts awarded to SITE Demonstration vendors by technology
type (Source: 1999 vendor information)
12
-------
Innovative Technology Highlights
SITE Program Case Studies
This section presents case studies of
innovative remediation technologies for vendors
that have participated in the SITE Program
through either the Demonstration Program (case
studies 1 through 3) or the MMT Program (case
study 4).
The case studies provide brief descriptions
on the use and status of various technologies and,
where available, general information on the cost of
applying each technology. These case studies
represent the SITE Program's approach to
promoting innovative technologies by identifying
user needs. In response to user needs, the
Demonstration Program assessed the performance
of an electrokinetic technology for chromium
extraction, a bioremediation technology for
chlorinated solvents, and a surfactant flood for
NAPL extraction (case studies 1 - 3). The
environmental community is also in need of low-
cost, accurate, and easy-to-use methods for
sediment sampling. The MMT Program has
addressed this issue by evaluating the performance
of two sediment sampling technologies (case study
4).
The technologies presented in these case
studies are typical of the SITE Program and
represent SITE'S remediation problem focus,
which is driven by the needs of the hazardous
waste community. These technologies represent
real or potential solutions to actual cleanup
problems faced by the environmental community.
Case Study 1: Sandia National Laboratory (In
Situ Electrokinetic Extraction)
The In Situ Electrokinetic Extraction
(ISEE) system, developed by Sandia National
Laboratory (SNL) is a treatment process that
facilitates extraction of metals from unsaturated
and saturated soil. The ISEE system consists of
three main units: an electrode assembly installed in
situ, a vacuum system, and a power supply.
Activation of the drive electrode causes
contaminants and other ions to be attracted to the
electrode casing. The water level control system
adds water to, and extracts water from the
electrodes. At the same time, water is
continuously pumped out from the electrode
casing at a constant rate. A metering pump
controlled by in-line pH meters regulates the
introduction of neutralization chemicals at each
electrode.
Waste Applicability
SNL has developed its electrokinetic
extraction system to treat anionic heavy metals
such as chromate in unsaturated soil. There is no
lower limit to the contaminant concentration that
can be treated; however, there may be a lower
limit on the ratio of contaminant ions to other ions
in the soil. Soils with high salinity content or sites
with buried metal debris would provide
exceedingly difficult technical challenges to this
technology. The technology can be expanded to
treat saturated soils.
Status
The ISEE technology was accepted into
the Demonstration Program in June 1994. The
demonstration was initiated in May 1996, at an
unlined chromic acid pit within a SNL RCRA
regulated landfill. The system was operated for a
total of'2,727 hours, and approximately 520 grams
of hexavalent chromium were removed during the
entire demonstration.
13
-------
Case Study 2: ITT Night Vision (In Situ
Enhanced Bioremediation of Groundwater)
ITT Night Vision is conducting in situ
enhanced aerobic bioremediation of contaminated
groundwater in fractured bedrock utilizing
technologies developed at the U. S. Department of
Energy Savannah River Site. This project
involves remediation of groundwater in the
vicinity of one contaminant source area as a pilot-
scale operation, with the possibility of applying the
technology elsewhere on site. Contaminants of
concern in on-site groundwater include chlorinated
solvents and their daughter products, plus acetone
and isopropanol. To accelerate the intrinsic
biodegradation observed at the site, the selected
remedy involves the subsurface injection of air,
gaseous-phase nutrients (triethyl phosphate and
nitrous oxide), and methane. The amendments are
being added to stimulate existing microbial
populations (particularly methanotrophs) so that
they can more aggressively break down the
contaminants of concern. Amendment delivery to
the subsurface is accomplished through an
injection well, and the injection zone of influence
is confirmed using surrounding groundwater
monitoring wells and soil vapor monitoring points.
The patented PHOSter process for
injection of triethyl phosphate in a gaseous phase
was licensed for use at this site as an integral
element of the enhanced bioremediation operation.
This technology maximizes the subsurface zone of
influence of nutrient injection as compared to
technologies injecting nutrients in liquid or slurry
form. Monitoring of contaminant (and breakdown
product) concentrations in groundwater and soil
vapor, measurement of microbiological population
density and diversity, and monitoring of nutrient
concentrations and groundwater geochemical
parameters provides feedback on system
effectiveness. This in turn allows adjustments to
be made in the sequencing and rate of delivery of
air, nutrients, and methane in response to change
in subsurface conditions.
Waste Applicability
This enhanced bioremediation technology
is capable of breaking down organic compounds
in groundwater. Compounds which are
amendable to intrinsic (natural) biodegradation can
be degraded more rapidly when the subsurface
microbial populations are stimulated through the
injection of air, gaseous-phase nutrients, and
methane. By providing an aerobic environment
for contaminant degradation, harmless breakdown
products are produced and toxic daughter products
of anaerobic degradation of chlorinated solvents
(such as vinyl chloride) can be broken down
completely. This in situ technology is especially
applicable in situations where subsurface
infrastructure (for example, networks of utilities)
limit or preclude excavation or extraction
technologies.
Status
The enhanced bioremediation system is
being used in the ongoing RCRA corrective action
interim measure at the ITT Night Vision facility.
It was accepted into the SITE Program in 1997,
with system start up occurring in March of 1998.
The technology had previously been approved by
EPA Region 3 as an Interim Measure part of the
facility's ongoing RCRA Corrective Action
Program.
Case Study 3: Duke Engineering and Services,
Inc. (Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer
Remediation of Nonaqueous Phase Liquids)
Surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation
(SEAR) technology greatly enhances the removal
of residual nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPL)
from the subsurface by increasing the solubility of
the NAPL and lowering the interfacial tension
between the NAPL and aqueous surfactant
solution. Increasing the solubility of the NAPL
with surfactants substantially enhances the removal
of the NAPL mass through pumping. Lowering
the interfacial tension between the NAPL and the
aqueous surfactant solution reduces the capillary
forces that trap the NAPL in the pore spaces of the
aquifer. Under certain conditions, the interfacial
tension can be lowered sufficiently to drain NAPL
from the pore
14
-------
spaces. This forms an oil bank in the subsurface,
which is then recovered at extraction wells.
Before SEAR technology can be
implemented, site specific characteristics must be
determined. Normal aquifer properties such as
stratigraphy, grain size distribution, mineralogy,
hydraulic conductivity, vertical and horizontal
gradients, and depth to groundwater must be
determined. In addition, a fundamental
understanding of the NAPL composition,
distribution, and quantity in the subsurface is
required. Knowledge of the quantity of NAPL
present prior to using SEAR prevents either under-
or over-designing the surfactant flood. Laboratory
experiments using soil core, contaminant,
groundwater, and source water from the site are
conducted to determine the optimum surfactant
solution mix. A geosystem model is then
developed which incorporates all the data
gathered. Simulations are run to determine
optimum injection and extraction well placement,
percent recoveries of the compounds injected,
contaminant concentration levels in the effluent,
percent removal of the contaminant mass, and all
other pertinent results of the surfactant flood.
Once the surfactant flood has been fully
designed, the surfactant solution is inj ected into the
contaminated zone in the subsurface through one
or more wells. The surfactant is drawn through
the subsurface by pumping at surrounding
extraction wells. As the surfactant moves through
the subsurface it solubilizes or mobilizes
(depending on the design) the NAPL for recovery
at the extraction wells. The recovered
groundwater and NAPL are then typically sent to
a phase separator. The recovered NAPL is either
disposed of or recycled, and the groundwater and
surfactant is treated. For large scale projects,
recovery and reuse of the surfactant from the
effluent stream can be economical.
Waste Applicability
SEAR technology is applicable for the
rapid removal of residual phase NAPL in the
subsurface. Although it does not directly
remediate the dissolved phase plume, removal of
the source zone contamination can greatly reduce
long term liability and risk. SEAR technology can
be effective for the removal of a broad range of
organic contaminants. This technology may not
be suitable for sites with low hydraulic
permeabilities (10"5 cm/sec or less) because of
increased difficulty in imposing the flood.
Status
SEAR technology was accepted into the
SITE Demonstration Program in 1997. The
technology completed field work on a
demonstration at Pearl Harbor in FY 99.
Case Study 4: MMT Program - Sediment
Sampling Technologies
The MMT Program demonstrated the
effectiveness of two sediment sampling
technologies to evaluate the ability of the samplers
to obtain a defined volume sediment sample at a
specific depth interval. The Demonstration also
investigated the ability of the samplers to collect
representative samples, ease of decontamination,
time between samples, and overall cost-
effectiveness of the technologies.
The technology demonstrations took place
at two sites in EPA Regions 1 and 5. One site
represented open-water conditions with low water
flow and a depth of approximately 10 feet, while
the other demonstration was a low lying wetland
with very slow moving water at a depth less than
2 feet. The Demonstration was conducted in April
and May 1999.
AMS Split Core Sampler for Submerged
Sediments (AMS Sampler)
The AMS Sampler is designed to collect
undisturbed samples in a variety of sediments at
depths up to 3 feet below the sediment surface.
The AMS Sampler has an inside diameter of 2
inches, and is designed to collect sample volumes
of 0.62, 1.24, and 1.86 liters using one to three
pairs of interlocking split core cups. The sampler
can be manually pushed, or hammered into
sediments depending on the desired application.
The design innovation incorporated into the AMS
Sampler is a ball check valve in the top cap to
allow water to escape as the sampler is deployed,
15
-------
while creating a vacuum to retain the sample
during retrieval.
The AMS Sampler showed performance
that was superior to conventional alternatives in
the reliability of sample recovery. It performed
with equivalent efficiency in collecting samples of
defined volumes at the specified depth intervals.
The AMS Sampler showed reductions in sampling
time requirements, and potential economic benefits
relative to conventional technologies. The sampler
provided more efficient sample recovery by using
an electric hammer to induce vibrations in the
sampler.
ARI Russian Peat Borer (ARI Borer)
The ARI Borer is a manual drive core
sampler designed to collect uncompressed samples
of bog and marsh sediments. The sampler
operates in water depths up to 15 feet, and can
operate at depth up to 65 feet below the sediment
surface. The ARI Borer can be used with 20 or 40
inch core tube lengths, with associated sample
volumes of 0.5 and 1.0 liters. The Borer
incorporates an innovate core head and bottom
point made of a thermoplastic polymer with
desirable mechanical properties.
The ARI Borer showed remarkable
superiority to the reference method by consistently
obtaining samples from depths below 4 feet where
the conventional technologies had difficulty. In
addition, the ARI Borer reduced sampling time by
16 to 77 percent, and collected samples with
minimal compression. However, the Borer
required more attempts to take samples, and
showed significantly lower sample recovery as
compared to the reference methods.
16
-------
FY 99 Progress and Accomplishments
Demonstration Program
The objective of the Demonstration
Program is to conduct field demonstrations and
high-quality performance verifications of viable
remediation technologies at sites that pose high
risks to human health and/or the environment, are
common throughout a region or the nation, or
where existing remediation methods are
inadequate, unsafe, or too costly. The SITE
Program solicits applications annually from those
responsible for cleanup operations at hazardous
waste sites. A panel of SITE Program scientists,
engineers, and associated environmental experts
reviews the applications to identify those
technologies that best represent solutions for the
most pressing environmental problems. The
resulting data and reports are intended for use by
decision-makers in selecting remediation options
and for increasing credibility in innovative
applications.
Over the past 14 years, SITE has earned
increased recognition as a leader in advancing
innovative technology development and
commercialization and has participated
cooperatively with more than 128 technology
developers. Through FY 99, the SITE Program
has successfully demonstrated 108 technologies, 7
of which were demonstrated during FY 99. These
demonstrations have provided a tremendous
amount of information on the performance, costs,
and applicability of innovative cleanup
technologies, which greatly assists managers of
environmental remediation projects in developing
appropriate and effective cleanup solutions. SITE
has been responsive to the user community during
this time, and has recently focused on the need for
in situ
UNPROVEN
TECHNOLOGY
remediation technologies to more cost effectively
remediate sites. As shown in Figure 7, 67
completed SITE projects have been ex situ and 41
in situ. Of the 22 ongoing or planned
demonstrations, 13 are in situ, while 9 are ex situ.
The types and numbers of innovative
technologies selected for remediation at Superfund
sites increased significantly after the passage of
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA). While rarely used during the early
1980s, innovative technologies comprised
approximately one-quarter of the total number of
technologies selected for Superfund remediation
projects between FY 86 and FY 87. Since then,
the number has continued to rise, indicating
increased credibility and confidence in a number
of innovative treatment technologies. Figure 2
shows that more innovative technologies than
conventional technologies were selected in
Records of Decisions (RODsofficial records
documenting selection of Superfund site cleanup
methods) signed during FY 93 through FY 98.
17
-------
Planned
Completed
13
D
67
20
30
40
50
60
70
lln Situ DEx Situ
Figure 7 Distribution of in situ and ex situ SITE Demonstration projects at the end of FY 99.
Although SITE is only one contributing factor in
increasing innovative technology selection, the
program has played a significant role in this
activity.
Field demonstration and evaluation of in
situ technologies may require several months or
years of data collection. Based on the SITE
Program's increased emphasis on in situ
technologies, the number of ongoing
demonstrations will likely increase, with fewer
moving from ongoing to completed status each
year than in the past. It is estimated that six
field demonstrations will be completed each
year.
During FY 99, seven new innovative
technologies were evaluated in the field.
Completed demonstration projects are listed in
Table 1, and ongoing projects are provided in
Table 2. All completed and ongoing projects in
the Demonstration Program, ETP, and MMT
Program are listed in Appendices A and B.
Emerging Technology Program
Nine solicitations were issued from
November 1987 (E01 Solicitation) to July 1995
(E09 Solicitation). A total of 77 technology
development projects were initiated under the
ETP, and 66 proj ects were successfully completed.
Eighteen of the former ETP projects entered into
the Demonstration Program.
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
Program
The MMT Program has leveraged its
resources with EPA's Environmental Technology
Verification Program. These two programs,
known collectively as the Consortium for Site
Characterization Technologies, have developed a
partnership with the DOE. Resources from the
SITE Program are used solely for those
technologies addressing hazardous waste. This
partnership will help to address the demands on
the MMT Program and reduce the backlog of
applications submitted by developers of innovative
technologies.
To further advance the MMT Program, a
stakeholder group was formed to assist in outreach
activities and in the selection of technologies. An
advocates program involving the EPA Regional
offices was also established to assist in the MMT
demonstration process and to ensure that the
products of the demonstrations address issues
18
-------
relevant to EPA.
Table 1. SITE Demonstration Projects Completed in FY 99
Developer
Location
Developer
Technology
Site Location
TX
Duke
Engineering
Surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR) technology
greatly enhances the removal of residual NAPLs. The
technology works by increasing the solubility of the NAPL,
thereby allowing the removal of contaminants by pumping.
Pearl Harbor, HA
VA
ITT
Nightvision
The ITT Night Vision technology uses in situ enhanced
aerobic bioremediation in fractured bedrock. The process
accelerates intrinsic bioremedation by injection of nutrients,
electron donors, and electron acceptors.
Roanoke, VA
MA
KSE, Inc.
The KSE Adsorption-Integrated-Reaction (AIR) Process
combines adsorption and chemical reaction to treat air streams
contaminated with VOCs. The AIR Process was demonstrated
to treat chlorinated organic laden gases from a soil vapor
extraction system at a contamination Superfund site in Rhode
Island.
N. Smithfield, RI
PA
MACTEC
The No VOCs in-well stripping technology combines air-lift
pumping with in-well vapor stripping to remove VOCs from
contaminated groundwater.
San Diego, CA
UT
Phytokinetics,
Inc.
The technology uses plants to reduce concentrations of
petroleum hydrocarbons in near-surface soils and the saturated
zone. The demonstration investigated the use of alfalfa and
fescue to treat soil, and poplar and juniper trees to treat the
saturated groundwater zone.
Ogden, UT
NJ
Phytotech
The phytoremediation technology uses specially selected and
engineered plants to treat soil and sediment contaminated with
toxic metals and radionuclides. The technology is being
demonstrated at a former metal-plating facility.
Trenton, NJ
NM
Sandia
National
Laboratory
The In Situ Electrokinetic Extraction (ISEE) Technology uses
electrokinetic technology to remediate metals and ionic
contaminants in soil. The technology is being demonstrated at
a chromic acid disposal pit at Sandia National Laboratory.
Sandia, NM
19
-------
Table 2. SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects in FY 99
Developer
Location Developer Technology Site Location
NM
CA
LA
NJ
Ontario,
Canada
CA
VT
LD
CO
CO
Commodore
Advanced
Sciences, Inc.
Eco Mat, Inc.
Electrokinetics
Envirogen, Inc.
EnviroMetal
Technologies,
Inc.
Geokinetics
International,
Inc.
Green
Mountain
Laboratories
Idaho National
Environment
and
Engineering
Laboratory
Pintail
Systems, Inc.
Pintail
Systems, Inc.
Solvated Electron Technology(SET) remediation system
chemically reduces toxic contaminants. The solvating system
uses a solution of ammonia and an "active" metal to create a
powerful reducing agent that can clean up contaminated soils,
sediments and liquids.
This technology uses denitryfing bacteria to convert nitrogen
compounds to harmless byproducts. The process uses
common bacteria that live on a sponge-like medium inside a
reactor. The reactor circulates these materials with
contaminated water to enhance biodegradation rates.
Electrokinetic's soil process extracts and remediates heavy
metal or organic contamination in soils. Electrodes are placed
in situ, and a current is applied to mobilize ions and remove
contamination.
The Envirogen demonstration involves the use of solvent
extraction and bioremediation for PCBs at the Lower
Colorado River Authority Electrical Substation.
The In Situ Reactive Barrier uses zero-valent iron to reduce
oxidized metals and to induce reductive dechlorination of
chlorinated VOCs. In addition, this technology can
immobilize some metals by reduction and sorption.
This thermal technology applies AC current to the soil matrix
in order to produce heat. This process reduces LNAPL
viscosity, causes DNAPL to float to the top of the saturated
zone, reduces the size of the smear zone, and can increase the
biological activity in the heated zone.
A study is being performed on the applicability of enhanced
biodegradation of PCBs in contaminated soil at the Beede
Waste Oil Site.
Surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation at neutral buoyancy
allows for increased solubilization of DNAPLs to allow for
removal from the subsurface. The technology incorporates a
cosolvent to provide neutral buoyancy of treatment water to
provide vertical migration of contamination in the subsurface.
The technology involves growing and augmenting
indigenous bacteria in culture to reduce the leaching of lead
at contaminated sites. The cultures are grown in a laboratory
setting, and applied in situ to biostabilize lead contamination
in soil.
Isolated indigenous organisms capable of remineralizing
arsenic are grown and augmented in lab cultures. These
organisms are being used to remineralize arsenic at the
Argonaut Mine site.
Pearl Harbor, HI
Bendena, KS
Fort Polk, LA
Goldthwaite, TX
Rocky Flats, CO
Pearl Harbor, HI
Plaistow, NH
Milford, NH
Crooksville,
OH; Aurora, CO
Jackson, CA;
Aurora, CO
20
-------
Table 2 (continued). SITE Demonstration Ongoing Projects in F Y 99
Developer
Location
Developer
Technology
Site Location
LD
Process
Technologies,
Inc.
The Photolytic Destruction Technology is a method of
photochemically oxidizing gaseous organic compounds
within a reaction chamber. The technology uses ultraviolet
light to break apart chemical bonds of VOC molecules.
Sacramento, CA
IN
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
The MAECTITEฎ chemical treatment process can be applied
to soils, waste and other materials containing lead and other
heavy metals. The technology uses reagents and processing
equipment to stimulate the nucleation of crystals by chemical
bonding.
Sparta, WI
OH
U.S. EPA,
NRMRL
Alternate Cover Assessment Program (ACAP) - The ACAP is a
cooperative partnership of industry, government, and research
institutions that will evaluate evapotranspiration and break
cover systems. The program is expected to provide cost-
effective alternative cover designs, and assist in the
development of designs at other sites.
10 sites around
the nation
Technology Verification Process
The technology verification process is
designed to generate high-quality data that can be
used by EPA to confirm technology
performance. Four key steps are inherent in the
process:
Needs identification and technology
selection
Demonstration planning and
implementation
Report preparation
Information distribution
Needs Identification and Technology Selection
The first aspect of the technology verification
process is to determine the most important
technology needs of EPA and the regulated
community. EPA, the Department of Defense,
DOE, the private sector, and state agencies are
asked to identify technology needs and interest in
a technology area. Once a consensus is
established on a characterization or analysis
need, a search is conducted to identify suitable
technologies that will address the need. The
technology search and identification process
consists of reviewing responses to Commerce
Business Daily announcements, searches of
industry and trade publications, attendance at
related conferences, and leads from technology
developers. MMTs are evaluated against the
following criteria:
Meets regulatory or user needs
May be used in the field or in a mobile
laboratory
Applicable to a wide variety of
environmentally impacted sites
High potential for resolving problems
for which current methods are
unsatisfactory
Costs are competitive with current
methods
Performance is better than current
methods in areas such as data quality,
sample preparation, or analytical
turnaround time
Uses techniques that are easier and
safer than current methods
Is a commercially available, field-ready
technology
21
-------
Demonstration Planning and Implementation
After a technology has been selected, EPA, the
support contractor, and the technology developer
agree to responsibilities for conducting the
demonstration and evaluating the technology.
The following issues are addressed at this time:
Identifying demonstration sites that will
provide the appropriate physical or
chemical attributes, in the desired
environmental media
Identifying and defining the roles of
demonstration participants, observers,
and reviewers
Determining logistical and support
requirements (such as field equipment,
power and water sources, mobile
laboratory, or communications
network)
Arranging analytical and sampling
support
Preparing and implementing a
demonstration plan that addresses the
experimental design, sampling design,
quality assurance/quality control
(QA/QC), health and safety
considerations, scheduling of field and
laboratory operations, data analysis
procedures, and reporting requirements.
Report Preparation
Innovative technologies are evaluated
independently and, when possible, against
reference technologies. The field technologies
are operated by the developers in the presence of
independent technology observers. Technology
observers are provided by EPA or a third party
group. Demonstration data are used to evaluate
the capabilities, limitations, and field applications
of each technology. Following the
demonstration, all raw and reduced data used to
evaluate each technology are compiled into a
technology evaluation report, which is mandated
by EPA as a record of the demonstration. A data
summary and performance evaluation of each
technology are published in an Environmental
Technology Verification Report (ETVR).
Demonstrations in FY99
During FY 99, field demonstrations
were completed on two sediment sampling
technologies (Table 3). The technologies were
demonstrated at sites with different sediment
characteristics in Massachusetts and Wisconsin.
A brief description of the technologies and the
field demonstrations is given in the Innovative
Technology Highlights section of this report.
Ongoing Demonstrations
The MMT Program has identified TPH
analytical technologies for a demonstration to be
conducted during FY 00. Because TPH
analysis is one of the most commonly used
methods, improvements in the technology can
have a broad impact across the industry. The
science and practice of TPH analysis is of
considerable interest to the private sector, as well
as EPA Regional and Program Offices. This
MMT project will test nine innovative analysis
technologies that may prove to be more efficient
or cost-effective than current technologies. The
performance of each technology will be
compared to commonly used conventional
procedures. The demonstration will also collect
information describing the ease of operation,
cost and other relevant performance
characteristics of these devices. The
demonstration results will assist EPA and others
in considering the applicability of these
technologies, so they can be used with a
complete understandings of the strengths and
limitations of the technique.
22
-------
Table 3. SITE MMT Program Demonstrations Completed in F Y 99
Developer
Location Developer Technology Site Location
LD
WI
Aquatic
Research
Instruments
Art's
Manufacturing
and Supply
The ARI Russian Peat Borer can collect sediment samples under
field operating conditions.
The AMS Split Core Sampler can be used to collect and return
sediment samples in various conditions.
MA,WI
23
-------
Future Direction
Introduction
During FY 99, the SITE Demonstration
Program began its third year operating under a
market driven approach. This approach continues
to emphasize the importance of first selecting a site
and, secondly, evaluating one or more appropriate
innovative technologies. The selection of these
sites and technologies is important in meeting the
needs of those responsible for selecting and
implementing hazardous waste cleanup.
Three sites were selected under the first
host site solicitation. A wide range of
representation ensures that the most pressing issues
are prioritized and addressed. These sites were
selected by a review group comprised of
representatives from the following organizations:
DOD Environmental Security and Technology
Certification Program (ESTCP)
DOE Office of Science and Technology
EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response
EPA Regional Offices
Interstate Technology and Regulatory
Cooperation (ITRC) Workgroup
One of the selected sites completed an evaluation
of two technologies during FY 98. The two
additional sites are continuing evaluation of
technologies through FY 00.
In response to stakeholders demand, the
MMT Program initiated a series of demonstrations
designed to evaluate innovative sampling and
analysis technologies. In FY 98, soil and soil gas
sampling technologies were evaluated. In F Y 99,
a field demonstration of sediment sampling
technologies was conducted. In FY 00, the
program will investigate the applicability of nine
TPH measurement devices. These projects are
designed to address ongoing difficulties in
obtaining representative samples at defined depths,
or obtaining accurate analytical results using less
expensive and less complex equipment.
Demonstration Program Areas of Interest
The areas of primary interest remain an
important part of appropriate site selection.
Stakeholder groups, like those used in selecting the
sites and technologies, identify these areas with
technical staff within ORD. This helps ensure that
the most pressing needs are met.
In FY 99 the SITE Program continued to
emphasize the need for technologies capable of in
situ remediation of dense non-aqueous phase
liquids (DNAPLs) in difficult geological
formations. This continues to be a theme through
the remediation community as a whole. This also
parallels the theme set in the 1997 National
Research Council (NRC) report titled Innovation
in Groundwater and Soil Cleanup
(www.NAP.EDV/readingroom ISBN #0309-
06358-2). As the complexity of the geological
formation increases so does the need for innovative
technologies to treat or detect DNAPL. The
search for effective remediation technologies for
metals in soils, treatment of recalcitrant
compounds, and the general need for in situ
treatment remain high on the priority list.
Because of technical difficulties related to
sediment remediation, this is another area where
the remediation community would benefit from
new processes, approaches or less expensive
methods for treatment. In situ treatment, sampling,
24
-------
and containment are technology areas of interest to
be addressed by both the MMT and
Demonstration Programs. An increase of projects
in these areas is expected in the future.
Redevelopment of sites contaminated with
environmentally toxic or hazardous materials is a
global concern that requires an integrated
approach to mitigate the risks to human health and
the environment. Many of these sites can be
redeveloped under Brownfields initiatives that are
active all over the world. There are currently
many regulatory, liability, remediation, and
financial obstacles that hinderthese redevelopment
efforts. The SITE Program will play an important
and leading role in the areas of innovative
More Difficult
technology and technical assistance . The goal of
this support would be to reduce barriers to
redevelopment while protecting public health and
the environment. The SITE Program has taken the
first step in this process on an international scale
by participating in the US/German Bilateral
Working Group. The Bilateral Working Group
will initiate technology demonstrations that are
designed to support commercialization of
remediation and characterization technologies that
can be used in redevelopment efforts. Table 4
outlines the areas of interest of the SITE Program,
and Table 5 describes the planned demonstrations
for FY 00.
More Needs
s
u
S
=
4*
+J
ซ
4*
H
Clay / complex (includes fractured bedrock)
Heterogeneous (saturated)
Heterogeneous (unsaturated)
Fine (saturated)
Coarse / medium (saturated) - e.g. Cape Canaveral
Fine (unsaturated)
Coarse/medium (unsaturated)
H
re
n
o
era
re
re
a
Less Difficult
Less Needs
Figure 8. DNAPL Testing Site Roadmap: Media (Based on NRC Report, 1997)
Table 4. SITE Future Emphasis Areas 2001 - 2004
GROUNDWATER/SOILS
SEDIMENTS
25
-------
Mining Issues/Acid Mine Drainage
Manufactured Gas Plants
Wood Treating
Pesticide Manufacturers/Formulators
Brownfields
Chlorinated Oxygenates
In-situ Treatment
Ex-situ Dredged Material Treatment
- Confined Disposal Facilities (CDF)
TableS. SITE Program Projects FY 00
Site Name/
Location
Offutt Air Force
Base, Omaha, NE
Beede Waste
Oil/Cash Energy
Plainstow, NH
Cape Canaveral
Cocoa Beach, FL
Loring AFB
Aroostook, ME
Two sites in EPA
Regions 1 and 5
Technology
Electrokinetics
In situ bioremedation under
consideration
In situ thermal and in situ
oxidative technology
ongoing, in situ thermal
planned
4 in situ technologies under
consideration by the site
Evaluation of 9 TPH
measurement devices
Project Description
Electrokinetic extraction of
TCE from soil and
groundwater
Surface soils contaminated
with chlorinated VOCs, lead,
PAHsandPCBs
Groundwater and soils
contaminated with TCE
Groundwater contaminated
with VOCs, BTEX and TPH
TPH technologies will be
tested at two sites
Proposed Schedule
Treatability studies FY
98, Technology
demonstration FY 00
Treatability tests FY 98;
Demonstration FY 00
Technology selection
FY 98, technology
demonstration FY 99-01
Demonstration FY 00
Technology
demonstrations FY 00
MMT Program Areas of Interest
Emerging field analytical areas which
will be included in the MMT Program include in
situ monitoring technologies, especially for
ground water. In addition to the FY 00 TPH
testing, the MMT Program is interested in testing
non-invasive techniques for site characterization,
including a variety of geophysical techniques
which claim to be able to map a DNAPL plume
without the need for drilling wells. Evaluation of
geophysical technologies will be very complex
and will likely be conducted at controlled spill
facilities.
Because of the importance of effective water
quality monitoring to human and environmental
health, the MMT Program is planning a
demonstration to evaluate the performance of
water quality monitoring equipment. This
demonstration will evaluate a number of new and
portable devices that have been proposed to
measure various chemical indicators more
accurately and inexpensively.
There are a number of biological tests for
toxicity in soils and water that are relevant to
ecological risk assessment, and that may be
useful in waste and drinking water treatment
facilities. A demonstration is planned for FY 01
in order to evaluate the effectiveness of new
biological assessment techniques that may be
highly sensitive and inexpensive test methods.
Since the program has matured, a number
of developers in the area of X-ray fluorescence
and gas chromatography / mass spectrometry
26
-------
have made significant improvements in their
technology and will be candidates for
abbreviated demonstrations which will evaluate
the improvements.
Partnerships for Success
Federal to Federal Interface
The SITE Program recognizes the
importance of cooperation between federal
agencies to find common areas of need and
interest. Federal to federal interface is an
important aspect to enhancing the benefits of
technology demonstrations. It allows for
leveraging resources, expedited cost and
performance information exchange and cross
fertilization of technical expertise between
agencies. In common environmental areas of
interest this type of joint research is of great
benefit to all parties involved. One example of
this type of approach is the Interagency DNAPL
Consortium (IDC).
Federal Interface: Cape Canaveral Air Station
SITE Demonstration
The IDC at the Cape Canaveral site is
comprised of EPA, DOE, DOD, and NASA.
The objective of the group is to conduct side-by-
side demonstrations of 3 innovative technologies
for DNAPL remediation. The demonstration is
being conducted at Cape Canaveral Air Station
Launch Complex 34. The SITE Program will
provide the independent cost and performance
evaluation. The Air Force and DOE are
combining resources to contract the technology
vendors to complete demonstrations. NASA is
providing the site and in-kind services for the
completion of the demonstrations. NASA plans
to use successful demonstration results as a basis
for selecting the appropriate technology for
remediating Launch Complex 34. The
geological formation at the NASA Cape
Canaveral site is in what is considered a less
difficult to treat formation (Figure 8). In FY 00-
01, the IDC is interested in performing work at
more difficult to treat geological formations such
as heterogeneous saturated and unsaturated
zones, fractured bedrock and complex clays. It
is expected that different types of technologies
may be needed to treat varying complex
formations. These j oint proj ects could potentially
identify several innovative options or approaches
to solving environmental problems where
currently there are no solutions.
Federal to State Interface
Where there are common environmental
areas of interest, it is equally important to have
federal to state interactions as it is federal to
federal cooperation. The ITRC provides a
mechanism to interact with multiple state
regulatory agencies and state specific verification
programs. Direct interaction with multiple state
agencies provides many benefits. State
regulatory agencies are also faced with the
difficult problems associated with hazardous
waste clean-up, and the variation of regulations
between states. Interaction among multiple states
on SITE projects can result in multiple technical
issues being addressed in one field
demonstration. This reduces duplication of field
demonstrations to answer one or more state
specific regulatory questions.
The ITRC currently has several
workgroups that crosscut the SITE Program's
environmental priority areas of interest. The
various groups are as follows: 1) Passive Barrier
Workgroup, 2) DNAPL Workgroup, 3)
Phytoremediation Workgroup. These groups are
invited to participate in SITE Program
demonstration projects. Groups choose to
participate at a level required by the objectives of
the workgroup. Involvement of the workgroups
allows for better planning and exchange of
technical requirements early in the project
planning.
State Interface: Phytoremediation Workgroup
An example of multistate and SITE
participation is the ITRC Phytoremediation Work
Group. Phytoremediation technology uses plants
to remediate or stabilize contaminants in various
media, and has gained considerable interest from
regulators, environmental advocacy groups, site
27
-------
stakeholders, consultants, and the general public.
Phytoremediation has great promise to provide
an alternative remediation choice that can be
more cost-effective, safer, and more acceptable
to the public. However, like any other
technology, phytoremediation has inherent
limitations in the types of sites and contaminants
where it can be used for successful remediation
to desired concentration levels. The
Phytoremediation Work Group is working to
better understand and clarify many of the
following phytoremediation issues:
Provide a better understanding of
fundamental concepts of
phytoremediation technology
The types of sites and contaminants that
are appropriate for the technology
Evaluate contaminant mobilization and
by-product toxicity concerns
Consider issues related of disposal of
harvested plants or falling leaves
Continue to evaluate seasonal and
climate effects on remediation
Evaluate the effectiveness of the
technology on sorbed and highly
concentrated contaminants
Another important workgroup within the
ITRC is the verification team. This team worked
with 11 different verification programs including
SITE in evaluating and documenting technical
and cost parameters that are important to the
different states. The document produced by the
team will be a useful tool in determining and
meeting the technical information needs of the
state regulatory agencies. The report includes a
variety of elements to be included in verification
program reports. The states participating in the
ITRC were encouraged by the willingness of the
programs to accommodate states' needs. This
type of cooperation will enhance states'
confidence in the results of verification and allow
them to make more informed decisions regarding
use of innovative remediation technologies.
Information Transfer
Information transfer is accomplished
through a number of mechanisms. While the
internet information distribution is an effective
mechanism, published documentation, meetings,
and conferences remain an essential part of
technical information dissemination.
Coordination with existing remediation
workgroups and programs is also essential. The
SITE Program continues to work cooperatively
with numerous programs, such as DOD's
ESTCP Program, the Environmental Council of
States (ECOS) sponsored ITRC, and as stated
previously plans a much stronger technical
relationship with the DOE's Office of Science
and Technology.
Internet service allows for quick and
easily accessible information, and saves time and
costs in publication. In FY 98, SITE converted
all earlier publications to electronic format and
has made those documents accessible through the
SITE homepage. General program information
is available as well as quarterly reports, most
recent documents, program highlights and the
technology profiles of the vendors participating
in the program. As a result of the homepage, the
number of documents printed has been reduced
by 75%. According to Web Server Statistics, the
monthly average number of hits for electronic
information solicited from the SITE homepage
over the last year was 724. Numerous requests
come from outside the US, reflecting an
increased global interest in the SITE Program.
The program will continue pursuing and
supporting the development of document
summaries in areas where data exists on a variety
of technologies or applications. The information
is useful in providing the user community with
comparative technical information and costs
within an area. Documentation will continue for
some time since many of the technologies are in
situ and highly complex. In situ technology
evaluations are tested over varying lengths of
time, with a minimum time of 3-6 months. Most
are evaluated for one year. In the case of
phytoremediation, growing seasons span 2-3
years. The summaries will need updating as the
technologies mature and information becomes
28
-------
available.
http://www.epa.gov/ORD/SITE
29
-------
Appendix A
SITE PROJECTS
(Alphabetically by Developer State)
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
State
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
California
Developer
CMS Research
Corporation
Birmingham, AL
Arctic Foundations
Anchorage, AK
Brice Environmental
Service Corp.
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Arizona State
University
Tempe, AZ
STC Omega
(formerly Silicate
Technology
Corporation)
Scottsdale, AZ
Analytical and
Remedial
Technology, Inc.,
Milpitas, CA
Berkeley
Environmental
Restoration Center
(formerly Udell
Technologies, Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Binax Corp., Antox
Division
Sunnyville, CA
COGNIS, Inc.
Santa Rosa, CA
Eco Mat, Inc.
Hayward, CA
Technology
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Freeze Barrier
Soil Washing
Plant
Photo catalytic
Oxidation and
Air Stripping
Solidification and
Stabilization
Treatment
Automated
Sampling and
Analytical
Platform
In situ Enhanced
Extraction
Imunoassay for
PCB in Soil
Biological/
Chemical
Treatment
Biological
Denitrification
Contact
H. Ashley Page
205-773-6911
Ed Yarmak
907-562-2741
Craig Jones
907-452-2512
Gregory Raupp
606-965-2828
Elliot Berman
352-867-1320
Stephen Pelger
Scott Larsen
602-948-7100
Gary Hopkins
408-263-8931
Kent Udell
510-642-2928
Steve Collins
510-643-1300
Richard Lankow
408-752-1353
Steve Rock
U.S. EPA
513-569-7149
KimHalley
510-783-5885
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1992
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1999
Completed
1990
Completed
1991
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Ongoing
A-2
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
California
Developer
Energy and
Environmental
Research
Corporation
Irvine, CA
Energy and
Environmental
Research
Corporation
Irvine, CA
Environmental
Biotechnologies
Montara, CA
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
General Atomics
(formerly Ogden
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Geokinetics
Geokinetics & Duke
Engineering
GIS\Solutions, Inc.
Concord, CA
Technology
Hybrid Fluidized
Bed System
Reactor Filter
System
Microbial
Composting
Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge
De watering
Circulating Bed
Combuster
Acoustic Barrier
Separator
Electrokinetics
Electrokinetic
Heating &
Surfactant
Flushing
GISVKey
Environmental
Data
Management
Software
Contact
Richard Koppang
714-859-8851
Neil Widmer
714-859-8851
Douglas
Munnecke
415-596-1020
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
Anthony
Gattuso
619-455-2910
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1999
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1989
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Completed
1999
Completed
1993
A-3
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
California
Developer
Ground-water
Technology
Government
Services, Inc.
Concord, CA
Hughes
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Manhattan Beach,
CA
Lockheed Martin
Missiles & Space
Co., Inc.
Palo Alto, CA
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Membrane
Technology and
Research, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
North American
Technologies
Aprotek
San Ramon, CA
NOVATERRA, Inc.
(formerly Toxic
Treatments USA,
Inc.)
Los Angeles, CA
Praxis Environmental
Services
Burlingame, CA
Pulse Sciences,
San Leandro, CA
Technology
Biological
Composting
Steam Enhanced
Recovery
Process
Electrokinetic
Remediation
CAV-OX
Process
VaporSep
Membrane
Process
Oleofilter
In-situ and Air
Stripping
In-situ Steam
Enhanced
Extraction
X-Ray
Treatment
(Aqueous)
X-Ray
Treatment
(Soils)
Contact
Ronald Hicks
510-671-2387
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
Steven H.
Schwartzkopf
415-424-3176
Dale Cox
310-322-4143
Jack Simser
310-640-7000
Marc Jacobs
Doug
Gottschlich
415-328-2228
Cathryn
Wimberly
916-366-6185
Philip LaMori
310-328-9433
Lloyd Stewart
415-641-9044
Vemon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
Vemon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
Completed
1989
Completed
1997
Completed
1994
Ongoing
A-4
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
California
Developer
Radian Corporation
(formerly AWD
Technologies, Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
Retech, Inc.
UMah, CA
Rochem Separation
Systems, Inc.
Torrance, CA
Roy F. Weston
Sherman Oaks, CA
Simulprobe
Technologies, Inc.
SIVE Services
Dixon, CA
SRI Instruments
Torrance, CA
Terra-Kleen
Response Group,
Inc.
Del Mar, CA
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
Thermatrix, Inc.
(Formerly Purus,
Inc.)
San Jose, CA
U.S. EPA Region IX
San Francisco, CA
Technology
Integrated Vapor
Extraction and
Steam Vacuum
Stripping
Plasma Arc
Vitrification
Rochem Disc
Tube Module
System
In well Air
Stripping
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Steam Injection
and Vacuum
Extraction
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Solvent
Extraction
Entrained-Bed
Gasification
Photolytic
Oxidation
Excavation and
Foam
Suppression of
Volatiles
Contact
David Bluestein
415-227-0822
Ronald Womack
Leroy B. Leland
707-462-6522
David LaMonica
310-370-3160
JeffBannon
818-971-4900
Eric Klingel
704-660-1673
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Douglas Dieter
916-678-8358
Douglas
Gavilanes
310-214-5092
Alan Cash
619-558-8762
John Winter
310-908-7387
Steve McAdams
408-453-0490
John Blevins
415-744-2400
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1990
Completed
1991
Completed
1994
Completed
1994
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1997
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Completed
1990
A-5
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Colorado
Colorado
Developer
U.S. Filter
(formerly Ultrox)
Santa Ana, CA
Xon Tech, Inc.
VanNuys, CA
CF Systems
Corporation
Arvada, CO
Colorado Dept. of
Health
Denver, CO
Colorado School of
Mines, Golden, CO
and Colorado
Department of
Health
Denver, CO
General
Environmental
Corporation
Englewood, CO
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Region 8 and State of
Colorado
Technology
Ultraviolet
Radiation and
Oxidation
Xon Tech Sector
Sampler
Solvent
Extraction
Batch Organics
Extraction Unit
Wetland-Based
Treatment for
Mineral Mine
Drainage
Wetlands-Based
Treatment
Electrocoagulatio
n
Biodegradation of
Cyanide
Biostabilization
of Lead
Biostabilization
of Mercury
Mining Wastes
Biological
Stabilization of
Arsenic in Soils
Multiple
Innovative
Passive mine
Drainage
Technologies
Contact
John Lowry
412-722-1247
Matt Young
818-787-7380
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
Jim Lewis
303-692-3390
Thomas
Wildeman
303-273-3642
Carl Dalrymple
303-761-6960
Caren Caldwell
303-367-8443
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Victor
Kettellapper
303-312-6578
Program
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1989
Completed
1991
Completed
1988
Ongoing
Completed
1999
Completed
Completed
1995
Completed
1998
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
A-6
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Connecticut
Delaware
Delaware
Florida
Developer
Rocky Mountain
Remediation Services
Golden, CO
Smith Environmental
Technologies
Corporation
(formerly Canonie
Environmental
Services Corp.)
Englewood, CO
Dexsil Corporation
Hamden, CT
4 demonstrations
E.I. DuPont de
Nemours and Co.
and Oberlin Filter
Co.
Newark, DE and
Waukesha, WI
Hewlett-Packard
(formerly MTI
Analytical
Instruments)
Wilmington, DE
Strategic Diagnostics
Inc. (formerly Ensys,
Inc.)
Newark, DE
Funderburk and
Associates
Apollo Beach, FL
Technology
Environmental
Soil Amendment
(Stabilization)
Low
Temperature
Thermal Aeration
Anaerobic
Thermal
Processor
Environmental
Test Kits (PCB)
Chlor-N-Soil
L2000
PCB/Chloride
Analyzer
Membrane
Microfiltration
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Immunoassay for
PCP
Dechlorination
and
Immobilization
Contact
Jim Barthel
303-215-6620
Joseph Hutton
303-790-1747
Joseph Hutton
303-790-1747
Jack Mahon
203-288-3509
Ernest Mayer
302-774-2277
Hewlett-Packard
800-227-9770
Bob Belair
302-633-8487
Tim Lawruk
800-544-8881
302-456-6782
Ray Funderburk
800-723-8847
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Status
Completed
Completed
1992
Completed
1991
Completed
1993
Completed
1990
Completed
1992
Completed
1993
Completed
1997
A-7
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Georgia
Idaho
Developer
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications,
Inc./Florida
International
University and
University of Miami
Miami, FL
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications, Inc.
Miami, FL
PCP, Inc.
West Palm Beach,
FL
American
Combustion, Inc.
Norcross, GA
ETC., Inc.
Norcross, GA
Sonotech, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Williams
Environmental
Services, Inc.
(Formerly Harmon
Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Stone Mountain, GA
Aquatic Research
Instruments
Aquatic Research
Instruments
Argonne National
Laboratory West
Idaho Fall, ID
Technology
High-Energy
Electron
Irradiation
(Aqueous)
High Energy
Electronic Beam
(Solids)
Ion Mobility
Spectrometry
PYRETRON
Thermal
Destruction
Long-Path
Fourier
Transform
Infrared
Spectrometer
Frequency
Tunable Pulse
Combustion
System
Soil Washing
Sediment Core
Sampler
Russian Peat
Borer
Phytoremediatio
nof
Radionuclides
Contact
William Cooper
910-962-3450
William Cooper
305-593-5330
Martin Cohen
407-683-0507
Gregory Gitman
404-564-4180
Orman Simpson
404-242-0977
BenZinn
404-894-3033
S. Jackson
Hubbard
(U.S. EPA)
513-569-7507
Will Young
208-768-2222
Will Young
208-768-2222
Scott Lee
208-533-7829
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
Completed
1991
Completed
1988
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Exited 1992
Completed
Completed
Ongoing
A-8
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Illinois
Illinois
Developer
Art's Manufacturing
and Supply
J.R. Simplot Co.
Pocatello, ID
Morrison Knudsen
Corp./STG
Technologies
Boise, ID
Process
Technologies, Inc.
Boise, ID
U.S. DOE/ Duke
Engineering
Lockheed, ID
Allied Signal
Corporation
Des Plains, IL
Institute of Gas
Technology
Institute of Gas
Technology
Technology
AMS Dual-
Tube Liner Soil
Sampler
AMS Split
Core Sampler
Anaerobic
Biological
Process
Anaerobic
Biological
Process
Grouting
Technique
Photolytic
Destruction of
SVE off-gases
Surfactant
Enhanced
Acquifer
Remediation
Submerged
Aerobic Fixed
Film Reactor
Chemical and
Biological
Treatment
Fluid Extraction-
Biological
Degradation
Process
Fluidized-Bed
Cyclonic
Agglomerating
Incinerator
Superficial
Extraction/Liquid
Phase Oxidation
of Waste
Contact
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Russell Kaake
208-235-5620
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Kathryn Levihn
Rick Raymondi
208-386-6115
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Michael Shook
208-526-6945
Steve Lupton
708-391-3500
Robert Kelley
847-768-0722
Albert Paterek
847-768-0720
Mike Mensinger
847-768-0602
Amir Rehmat
847-768-0588
Mike Mensinger
847-768-0602
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
Completed
1999
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
A-9
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Developer
OHM Environmental
(formerly RUST
Remedial Services,
Inc.)
Lombard, IL
Recycling Sciences,
Inc.
Chicago, IL
Wheelabrator Clean
Air Systems
(formerly Chemical
Waste Management)
Schaumburg, IL
Bio-Rem, Inc.
Butler, IN
Geoprobe
Salina, KS
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Munster, IN
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Munster, IN
Soil Tech, ATP
Systems Inc
Porter, IN
Clements Associates,
Inc.
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Microsensor System,
Inc.
Bowling Green, KY
Technology
X-TRAX
Thermal
Desorption
Desorption and
Vapor Extraction
System
Evaporation and
Chemical
Oxidation
Augmented In-
situ Subsurface
Bioremediation
Process
Soil, Water,
Vapor
Sampling Cone
Penetrometer
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
MAECTITEฎ
Treatment
Process
Thermal
Desorption
JMC
Environmentalist's
Subsoil Probe
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Contact
Dick Ayen
803-646-2413
William Meenan
312-663-4269
Bob Hernquist
708-706-6900
David Mann
219-868-5823
800-428-4626
Wes McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
Chuck
McPheeters
219-836-0116
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Norman Davis
502-752-1353
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurements
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurements
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed
1992
Ongoing
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
Completed
1995
A-10
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Developer
Advanced
Remediation Mixing,
Inc. (Formerly
Chemfix
Technologies, Inc.)
Kenner, LA
Electrokinetics, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
SBP Technologies,
Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Quadrel Services,
Inc.
W. L. Gore and
Associates, Inc.
ABB Environmental
Services, Inc.
Wakefield, MA
Harding Lawson
Associates (formally
ABB Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Wakefield, MA
Bruker Instruments
Billerica, MA
HNU Systems, Inc.
Newtown, MA
HNU Systems, Inc.
Newtown, MA
Technology
Solidification and
Stabilization
Electrokinetic
Remediation
Electro-Klean
Electrokinetic
Soil Remediation
Membrane
Separation and
Bioremediation
Emfluxฎ Soil-
Gas Survey
System
Gore-Scrubberฎ
Passive Soil Gas
Sampler
Anaerobic/
Aerobic
Sequential
Bioremediation
Two-Zone Plume
Interception In-
situ Treatment
Strategy
Bruker Mobile
Environmental
Monitor
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Contact
Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466
ElifAcar
504-388-3992
ElifAcar
504-753-8004
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
Ray
Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
Jaret Johnson
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
Dr. Brian
Abraham
508-667-9580
Jack Driscoll
800-724-6690
617-964-6690
Jack Driscoll
800-724-6690
617-964-6690
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed
1989
Completed
1989
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
Completed
Completed
1998
Completed
Completed
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
A-ll
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Developer
KSE, Inc.
Amherst, MA
Maxymillian
Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Clean
Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
Millipore
Corporation
Bedford, MA
Niton Corporation
Bedford, MA
Ohmicron
Corporation
Newton, MA
PSI Technology Co.
Andover, MA
UV Technologies,
Inc.
(formerly Energy and
Environmental
Engineering, Inc.)
East Cambridge, MA
BioTrol Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Technology
Air II
Photo catalytic
Technology for
Air Streams
High
Temperature
Thermal Process
EnviroGard PCB
Immunoassay
Test Kit
Immunoassay for
PCP (Soil,
Water)
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Immunoassay for
PCP in Soil
Immobilize and
Decontaminate
Metals in
Aggregate Solids
Laser-Induced
Photochemical
Oxidative
Destruction
Biotreatment of
Groundwater
Methanotropic
Bioreactor
System
Biological
Aqueous
Treatment
System
Contact
James Kittrell
413-549-5506
Jim
Maxymillian
413-499-3050
Alan Weiss
617-275-9200
Alan Weiss
617-275-9200
Don Sackett
781-275-9275
Mary Hayes
215-860-5115
Joseph Morency
508-689-0003
John Roll
James Porter
617-666-5500
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Durell Dobbins
612-942-8032
Durell Dobbins
612-942-8032
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1999
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
1993
Completed
1993
Completed
1989
Completed
1992
Completed
1989
A-12
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
Developer
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Membrane
Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
COGNIS
TERRAMET
Gross, MO
Montana College of
Mineral Science and
Technology
Butte, MT
University of
Nebraska
Lincoln, NE
U.S. EPA
Las Vegas, NV
Accutech Inc
Keyport, NJ and
New Jersey Institute
of Technology
Newark, NJ
ART International,
Inc.
(formerly Enviro
Sciences, Inc.)
Denville, NJ
Dehydro-Tech.
Corporation
Somerville, NJ
Technology
Soil Washing
System
Membrane Gas
Transfer in
Waste
Remediation
Removal of Lead
from Soils
Air-Sparged
Hydrocyclone
Campbell
Centrifugal Jig
Spray Irrigation
Field Analytical
Screening
Program
(FASP)
Pneumatic
Fracturing
Extraction and
Hot Gas
Injection
Low-Energy
Solvent
Extraction
Process
Carver-
Greenfield
Process for
Extraction of
Oily Waste
Contact
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Charles Gantzer
612-378-2160
Lou Magdits
573-626-3476
Theodore Jordan
406-496-4112
406-496-4193
Gordon Ziesing
406-496-1573
406-496-4193
Ray Spalding
402-483-3931
Howard Fribush
703-603-8831
Larry Jack
702-798-2373
John Liskowitz
908-739-6444
Werner Steiner
201-627-7601
Theodore
Trowbridge
908-904-1606
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1989
Discontinued
Completed
1994
Completed
1994
Ongoing
Completed
1996
Completed
1996
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1991
A-13
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
New Jersey
Developer
Geotech
Development
Corporation
Newark, NJ
Envirogen, Inc.
Lawrenceville, NJ
M.L. ENERGIA,
Inc.
Princeton, NJ
M.L. ENERGIA,
Inc.
Princeton, NJ
New Jersey Institute
of Technology,
Hazardous Substance
Management
Research Center
Newark, NJ
New Jersey Institute
of Technology
Newark, NJ and
GeoTech
Development
Corporation
King of Prussia, PA
New Jersey Institute
of Technology
Newark, NJ
Phytotech, Inc.
Monmouth, NJ
Sentex Sensing
Technology, Inc.
Ridgefield, NJ
Solucorp
Saddle Back, NJ
Technology
Cold Top
Vitrification
Microbial
Degradation/
Solvent
Extraction
Reductive Photo-
Dechlorination
Treatment
Reductive
Photo-Thermal
Oxidation
Processes for
Chlorocarbons
Pneumatic
Fracturing/
Bioremediation
Cold Top
Vitrification
GHEA
Associates
Process
Phytoextraction
of metal from soil
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Molecular
Bonding System
Contact
William Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Ronald Unterman
(609) 936-9300
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
John Schuring
201-596-5849
David Kosson
908-445-4346
William Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Itzhak Gottlieb
201-226-4642
Burt Ensley
908-438-0900
Amos Linenberg
201-945-3694
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1998
Completed
1992
ompleted
A-14
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
New Mexico
New Mexico
New York
Developer
Billings and
Associates, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Commodore
Advanced Sciences,
Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Resource
Management and
Recovery (formerly
Bio-Recovery
Systems, Inc.)
Las Graces, NM
Sandia National
Laboratories
Albuquerque, NM
Thermo Nutech
(formerly TMA
Eberline)
Albuquerque, NM
Photovac
International, Inc.
Deer Park, NY
SBP Technologies,
Inc.
White Plains, NY
RECRA
Environmental, Inc.
(formerly Electro-
Pure Systems, Inc.)
Amherst, NY
State University of
New York at
Oswego
Oswego, NY
Technology
Subsurface
Volatilization and
Ventilation
System
Set Process for
PCBs in soil
AlgaSorb
Biological
Sorption
Electrokinetic
Extraction in
Unsaturated Soils
Segmented Gate
System for
Radioactive
Materials
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
Bioventing, Air
Sparging,
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with
State of New
York)
Alternating
Current
Electrocoagula-
tion Technology
Photo catalytic
Treatment for
Sediments
Contact
Gale Billings
505-345-1116
Don Brenneman
713-676-5324
Mark Jones
505-872-6803
Mike Ho sea
505-382-9228
Eric Lindgren
505-844-3820
Earl Mattson
505-856-3311
Jeff Brown
423-481-0683
Mark Collins
516-254-4199
Richard
Desrosiers
914-694-2280
NickKolak
518-457-3372
Kenneth Kinecki
800-527-3272
Ronald Scrudato
Jeffrey
Shiarenzelli
315-341-3639
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1994
Ongoing
Completed
1990
Completed
1999
Completed
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
A-15
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Ohio
Ohio
Developer
Texaco Syngas, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Xerox Corporation
Webster, NY
ASC/EMR
Wright Patterson
AFB
Dayton, OH
Babock and Wilcox
Alliance Research
Center
Alliance, OH
Battelle Memorial
Institute
Columbus, OH
Commodore
Environmental
Columbus, Ohio
Ferro Corporation
Independence, OH
IT Corporation
Cincinnati, OH
IT Corporation
(formerly OHM
Remediation Services
Corp.)
Findlay, OH
Technology
Gasification
Process
Ground Water
Extraction
Phytoremedia-
tion of TCE in
Groundwater
Cyclone
Vitrification
In-situ
Electroacoustic
Soil
Decontamina-
tion
Solvated Electron
Treatment of
Chlorinated
Organics
Waste
Vitrification
Through Electric
Melting
Chelation/
Electro-
deposition of
Toxic Metals
from Soil
Oxygen
Microbubble
In-situ
Bioremediation
Contact
John Winter
316-251-4000
ext. 536
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
Phil Mook
916-643-5443
Greg Harvey
513-255-7716
Lawrence King
216-829-7576
Satya Chauhan
614-424-4812
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365
S.K. Muralidhar
216-641-8580
Radha Krishnan
513-782-4700
Douglas Jerger
423-690-3211
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1995
Completed
1998
Completed
1991
Completed
Completed
1996
Completed
Completed
Completed
1998
A-16
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Developer
Monsanto/ Dupont
Cincinnati, OH
University of
Dayton Research
Institute
Dayton, OH
US EPA Mobile
Volume Reduction
Unit
Cincinnati, Ohio
U.S. EPANRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPANRMRL
andETG
Environmental
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA Risk
Reduction
Engineering
Laboratory and IT
Corporation
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA Risk
Reduction
Engineering
Laboratory and
FRX, Inc.
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Geo-Microbial
Technologies,
Ochelata, OK
Metorex, Inc.
Bend, OR
Technology
In-situ
Electroosmosis
ofTCEinsoil/
Groundwaters
"Lasagna
Process"
Photothermal
Detoxification
Unit (PDU)
Soil Washing
Bioventing
Base-Catalyzed
Dechlorination
Process
Debris Washing
System
Hydraulic
Fracturing
Alternate Cover
Assessment
Program (ACAP)
Technology for
Metals Release
and Removal
from Wastes
Field Portable X-
Ray Fluorescence
(FPXRF)
Contact
Thomas
Holdsworth
513-569-7675
Berry Dellinger
John Graham
513-229-2846
Richard Griffith
908-321-6629
Paul McCauley
513-569-7444
George Huffman
513-569-7341
Yei-Shong Shieh
215-832-0700
Michael Taylor
513-782-4700
William Slack
513-469-6040
Steve Rock
513-569-7149
Donald Hitzman
918-535-2281
Jim Pasmore
800-229-9209
541-385-6748
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Status
Completed
1998
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Completed
1997
Completed
1993
Completed
1990
Completed
1992
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1995
A-17
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Developer
Aluminum Company
of America (formerly
Alcoa Separations
Technology, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation
Technologies
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Center for
Hazardous Materials
Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Center for
Hazardous Materials
Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Concurrent
Technologies
(formerly Center for
Hazardous Materials
Research)
Pittsburgh, PA
MacTec-SPB
Technologies
Company
Pittsburgh, PA
Geo-Con, Inc.
Monroeville, PA
2 Demonstrations
Horsehead Resource
Development Co.
Inc.
Monaca, PA
Lewis Environmental
Services, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Strategic Diagnostics,
Inc.
Newtown, PA
Technology
Bioscrubber
Perox-Pur
Chemical
Oxidation
Acid Extraction
Treatment
System
Organics
Destruction and
Metals
Stabilization
Lead Smelting
In Well Vapor
Stripping of
Ground Water
In-situ
Solidification/
Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Soil Leaching
Process
Immunoassay for
PCP
Contact
Paul Liu
412-826-3711
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
B Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
Brian Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Brian Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Mark
McGlathery
800-444-6221
Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810
Tom Lewis III
412-322-8100
Craig Kostyshyn
215-860-5115
ext. 634
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
1999
Completed
1988
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
1993
A-18
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
South Carolina
Tennessee
Developer
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
Pitsburgh, PA
R.E. Wright
Middletown, PA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Vortec Corp
Collegeville, PA
E&C Williams
Summerville, SC
University of South
Carolina
Columbia, SC
Bergmann USA
Gallatin, TN
Brown and Root
Environmental/
Illinois Institute of
Technology
Oak Ridge, TN
IT Corporation
Knoxville, TN
Technology
Slurry
Biodegradation
Bioventing, Air
Sparging,
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with state
of New York)
Thermal
Desorption
Steam
Regeneration
Adsorption
System
(Ambersorb)
Oxidation and
Vitrification
Process
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
In-situ
Mitigation of
Acid Water
Soil and Sediment
Washing
Technology
Radio Frequency
Heating
Batch Steam
Distillation and
Metal Extraction
Contact
David Nakles
412-826-3340
Richard Cronce
717-944-5501
Mike Cosmos
215-430-7423
John
Thoroughgood
610-701-3728
Deborah Plantz
215-537-4061
James Hnat
610-489-2255
Charlie Williams
843-821-4200
Frank Caruccio
803-777-4512
George Jones
615-230-2217
Clifton Blanchard
423-483-9900
Stuart Shealy
423-690-3211
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1991
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
A-19
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Texas
Texas
Developer
IT Corporation
Knoxville, TN
WASTECH, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Geokinetics and
Duke Engineering
EET, Inc.
Bellaire, TX
ENSR Consulting
Engineering and
Larson Engineering
Houston, TX
Filter Flow
Technology, Inc.
League City, TX
Fugro Geosciences,
Inc.
Houston, TX
Technology
Eimco Biolift
Slurry Reactor as
developed by
Tekno
Associates
Mixed Waste
Treatment
Process
Photocalytic and
Biological Soil
Detoxificaiton
Solidification/
Stabilization
Electrokinetic
Flushing &
Surfactant
Flushing
PCB/Metals
Extraction from
Porous Surfaces
Bioventing, Air
Sparging,
Biological
Treatment for
Ground Water
(multi-developer
project with the
State of New
York)
Colloid Polishing
Method
Laser
Fluorescence
PAH, BTEX
Screening Cone
Penetrometer
Contact
Kandi Brown
423-690-3211
Ed Alperin
615-690-3211
Duane Graves
423-690-3211
Terrence Lyons
U.S. EPA
513-569-7859
Harry
Linnemeyer
512-425-2000
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Tim Tarrillion
713-662-0727
David Ramsden
(ENSR)
713-520-6802
N. Sathi-yakumar
716-272-7310
Todd Johnson
713-334-6080
Andrew Taer
713-778-5580
Program
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
1999
Completed
1997
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1996
A-20
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Developer
Hanby
Environmental
Laboratory
Wimberly, TX
Hrubetz
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Solidtech, Inc.
Houston, TX
Star Organics
Dallas, TX
TN Spectrace
Round Rock, TX
University of
Houston
Houston, TX
Western Product
Recovery Group,
Inc.
Houston, TX
Phytokinetics, Inc.
North Logan, UT
Green Mountain
Laboratories
BioGenesis
Enterprises, Inc.
Fairfax Station, VA
Technology
PCP Test Kit
HRUBOUT
Process
Solidification and
Stabilization
Injection Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Spectrometer
Concentrated Salt
Extraction of
Lead
CCBA Physical
and Chemical
Treatment
Phytoremedia-
tion of Soils
Biodegradation of
PCBs in Soils
Soil Washing/
Biological
Treatment
Contact
John Hanby
512-847-1212
Barbara Hrubetz
Michael Hrubetz
214-363-7833
Bill Stall-worth
713-497-8558
Phil Clarke
214-522-0742
Peter Barry
512-388-9100
Dennis Clifford
713-743-4266
Donald Kelly
713-493-9321
Bert Elkins
619-749-8856
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
Adam Longee
802-223-1468
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1993
Completed
1993
Completed
1988
Completed
1999
Completed
1995
Completed
1999
Completed
1994
Completed
1999
Completed
1999
Ongoing
Completed
1992
A-21
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Developer
BWX Tech., Inc.
(Affiliate of Babcock
and Wilcox Co.
Lynchburg, VA
Dynaphore, Inc.
Richmond, VA
ITT Industries
Roanoke, VA
ECOVA Corporation
Redmond, WA
Geosafe Corporation
Richland, WA
Ionics/ Resources
Conservation Co.
Bellevue, WA
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
(ReTec) Seattle, WA
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
(ReTec) Seattle, WA
Scitec Corporation
Richland, WA
University of
Washington
Seattle, WA
Svedala Industries
(formerly Allis
Mineral Systems)
Oak Creek, WI
Technology
Cyclone Furnace
Removal of
Dissolved Heavy
Metals via
FORAGER
Sponge
Enhanced In-Situ
Bioremediation
of Chlorinated
Compounds
Bioslurry
Reactor
In-situ
Vitrification
BEST Solvent
Extraction
Methanotrophic
Biofilm Reactor
Liquid and Soils
Biological
Treatment
Field Portable X-
Ray Fluorescence
Asdorptive
Filtration
Pyrokiln Thermal
Encapsulation
Process
Contact
Evan Reynolds
804-522-6000
Norman Rainer
804-288-7109
Rosann
Kryczkowski
540-362-7356
Alan Jones
206-883-1900
James Hansen
Matthew Haass
509-375-0710
William Hines
206-828-2400
Hans Stroo
206-624-9349
Merv Cooper
206-624-9349
Steve Santy
800-466-5323
509-783-9850
Mark Benjamin
206-543-7645
JimKidd
414-798-6341
Glenn Heian
414-762-1190
Program
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1991
Completed
1994
Completed
1999
Completed
1991
Completed
1994
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1994
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1993
A-22
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Wyoming
Canada
Developer
USEPA/NRMRL
US-DA Forest
Products Lab
Madison
University of
Wisconsin,
Madison, WI
Western Research
Institute
Laramie, WY
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited
Chalk River, Ontario
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited
Chalk River, Ontario
Cone Tech
Investigations
Vancouver, British
Colombia
ELI Ecologic
International, Inc.
Rockwood, Ontario
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
2 Demonstrations
Technology
Fungus
Treatment
Technology
Photoelectro-
catalytic
Treatment of
Metals and
Organics in
Water
Contained
Recovery of Oily
Wastes (CROW)
Ultrasonic-Acid
Leachate
Treatment for
Mixed Wastes
Chemical
Treatment and
Ultrafiltration
Resistivity, pH,
Seismic,
Temperature,
Cone
Penetrometer
Thermal Gas
Phase Reduction
Process and
Thermal
Desorption
In Situ Reactive
Barrier
Metal Enhanced
Abiotic
Degradation
Contact
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Marc Anderson
608-262-2674
Charles Hill, Jr.
608-263-4593
James Speight
307-721-2011
Shiv Vijayan
613-583-3311
ext. 3220/6057
Leo Buckley
613-584-3311
Ward Phillips
604-327-4311
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
John Vogan
519-824-0432
William
Matulewicz
609-722-6700
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Emerging
Technology
Monitoring and
Measuring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ex- situ
In- situ
Status
Completed
1991
Completed
Completed
1991
Completed
1997
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
A-23
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Canada
England/United
Kingdom
Developer
Grace Dearborn, Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario
Matrix
Photo catalytic
Limited (formerly
Nutech
Environmental)
London, Ontario,
Canada
Matrix
Photo catalytic
Limited
Toronto Harbour
Comission
Toronto, Ontario
Wastewater
Technology Centre
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon
Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
AEA Technology
(formerly Warren
Spring Laboratory)
Oxfordshire, England
Technology
Daramend
Process
TiO2
Photo catalytic
Treatment of
Aqueous Waste
Streams
TiO2
Photo catalytic
Air Treatment
Soil Recycling
Cross-Flow
Pervaporation
System
Bioreactor
Integrated with
an Ultrafiltration
Membrane
System
Cross-Flow
Pervaporation
System
ZenoGem
Process
Physical and
Chemical
Treatment
Contact
Alan Seech
Paul Bucen
905-272-7480
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Dennis Lang
416-863-2047
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Lisa Ashton
905-639-6320
ext. 244
Phil Canning
Tony Tonelli
905-639-6320
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Steve Barber
011-44-1235-
463062
Program
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging
Technology
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1994
Completed
1995
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
Completed
1995
Completed
1994
A-24
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE (continued)
State
Italy
Puerto Rico
Developer
Graseby Ionics,
Limited
Waterford Herts,
England
Gruppo Italimpresse
(developed by Shirco
Infrared Systems,
Inc.) (formerly
ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
2 Demonstrations
Terra Vac, Inc.
San Juan, PR
Technology
Ion Mobility
Spectrometry
Infrared Thermal
Destruction
In- situ Vacuum
Extraction
Contact
John Brokenshire
011-44-1923-
816166
Martin Cohen
561-683-0507
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
James Malot
787-725-8750
Program
Measuring and
Monitoring
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1990
Completed
1987
Completed
A-25
-------
Appendix B
SITE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES
(Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
State
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Demonstration
Location
Fairbanks, AK
ABE
Superfund Site
(Region 10)
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Williams AFB
(Region 9)
Jefferson, AR
Incineration Research
Facility (IRF)
(Region 6)
Burbank, CA
Lockheed Site
(Region 9)
Technology
Soil Washing
Low Temperature
Thermal Aeration
Anaerobic
Thermal
Processor
In- situ
Subsurface
Bioremediation
Tunable-Pulse
Combustion
Pyreton Burner
(Thermal
Destruction)
Integrated In-situ
Vapor Extraction
and Steam
Vacuum
Stripping Process
Contact
Brice
Environmental
Services
Corporation
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Craig Jones
907-452-2515
Smith
Environmental
Services (formerly
Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Smith
Environmental
Services (formerly
Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Bio-Rem
Butler, IN
David O. Mann
219-868-5823
Sonotech, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Ben Zinn
404-894-3033
American
Combustion
Technologies
Norcross, GA
Gregory Gitman
404-564-4180
Radian
Corporation
(formerly AWD
Technologies, Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
David Bluestein
415-227-0822
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
1993
Completed
1995
Completed
1988
Completed
1990
B-2
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
Demonstration
Location
Clear Lake, CA
Clear Lake, CA
Clear Lake, CA
Edwards AFB, CA
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fullerton, CA
McColl Superfund
Site
(Region 9)
Huntington Beach, CA
Rainbow Disposal
(Region 9)
Technology
Biostabilization
of Mercury
Mining Wastes
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
CAV-OX
Oxidation
Process
Entrained-Bed
Gasfication
Silicate
Compounds by
Solidification/
Stabilizatioin
Excavation and
Foam
Suppression of
Volatiles
Steam Injection/
Vacuum
Extraction
(SIVE)
Contact
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Sevenson, W.C.
Munster, IN
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
E&C Williams
Summerville, SC
Charlie Williams
84-821-4200
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Dale Cox
310-640-7000
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
John Winter
310-908-7387
STC Omega
(formerly Silicate
Technology
Corporation)
Scottsdale, AZ
Steve Pegler
602-948-7100
U.S. EPA
Region 9
San Francisco, CA
Jon Blevins
415-744-2400
Hughes
Environmental
Manhattan Beach,
CA
(No longer a
vendor for SIVE)
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
1990
Completed
1990
Completed
1993
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
Demonstration
Location
Jackson, CA
Pintail Systems, Inc.
(Region 9)
Livermore, CA
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
(LLNL)
(Region 9)
Livermore, CA
LLNL
(Region 9)
March AFB, CA
(Region 9)
Port Hueneme, CA
Naval Facilities
Engineering Service
Center
(Region 9)
Redding, CA
Iron Mountain
Superfund Site
Sacramento, CA
McClellan AFB
(Region 9)
Sacramento, CA
McClellan AFB
(Region 9)
Technology
Biological
Stabilization of
Arsenic in Soils
Chemical
Oxidation
Perox-Pure
In-situ Enhanced
Extraction
In well Air
Stripping
Solvated Electron
Treatment of
Chlorinated
Organics
Precipitation,
Microfiltration,
Sludge
De watering
Photolytic
Destruction for
SVE Off-gases
Groundwater
Extraction
Contact
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation
Technologies
(formerly
Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Berkley
Environmental
Restoration
(formerly Udell
Technologies, Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Kent Udell
510-653-9477
Roy Weston
Woodland Hills,
CA
JeffBannon
818-971-4900
Commodore
Environmental
Columbus, OH
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Process
Technologies, Inc.
Boise, ID
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Xerox Two Phase
Extraction
Webster, NY
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
1996
Completed
1993
Ongoing
Completed
1995
B-4
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
California
Demonstration
Location
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Naval Air Station
North Island (NASNI)
(Region 9)
San Diego, CA
NASNI Site 9
(Region 9)
San Francisco, CA
Westin Hotel
(Region 9)
San Jose, CA
Lorentz Barrel and
Drum Site
(Region 9)
San Pedro, CA
Annex Terminal
(Region 9)
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Marie Health
Care Services (UST
Site)
(Region 9)
Technology
Circulating Bed
Cumbuster
In Well Vapor
Stripping of
Ground Water
Cross-flow
Pervaporation
System for
Removal of
VOCs from
Groundwater
GIS/KEY
Software for HW
Site
Data
Management
Ultraviolet Ozone
Treatment for
Liquids
In-situ Steam/
Air Stripping
Soil Washing/
Geological
Treatment
Contact
General Atomics
(formerlt Ogden
Environmental
Services)
San Diego, CA
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
MACTEC
Environmental,
Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Mark McGlathery
800-444-6221
Zenon
Environmental,
Inc.
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada
Phil Canning
905-639-6320
GIS Solutions,
Inc.
Concord, CA
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
US Filter
(formerly Ultrox
International, Inc)
Santa Ana, CA
John Lowry
412-772-1247
Novaterra, Inc.
(formerly Toxic
Treatment, Inc.)
Torrance, CA
Phil La Mori
310-328-9433
BioGenesis
Enterprises
(formerly
BioVersal USA)
Fairfax Station,
VA
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiran
708-827-0024
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1989
Completed
1999
Completed
1995
Completed
1993
Completed
Completed
1989
Completed
1992
B-5
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Colorado
Demonstration
Location
South El Monte, CA
(Region 9)
Clear Creek, CO
Burleigh Tunnel
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
Rocky Flats
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
DOE Rocky Flats
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Technology
Gasification
Process
Wetland-Based
Treatment for
Mineral Mine
Drainage
Colloid Polishing
Method
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Dual Tube Liner
Soil Sampler
Electrocoa-
gulation
EMFLUX Soil
Gas Survey
System
Gore- Scrubber
Passive Soil Gas
Sampler
Contact
Texaco Syngas,
Inc.
White Plains, NY
John Winter
316-251-4000
ext. 536
Colorado
Department of
Health
Denver, CO
Jim Lewis
303-692-3390
Filter Flow
Technology
League City, TX
Tod Johnson
713-334-6080
Simulprobe
Technologies, Inc.
CA
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
American Falls, ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
General
Environmental Inc.
(formerly
Hydrologies, Inc.)
Englewood, CO
Carl Dalrymple
303-761-6960
Quadrel Services,
Inc.
MD
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
W. L. Gore and
Associates, Inc.
Elkton, MD
Ray Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1999
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
Completed
1995
Completed
Completed
B-6
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Colorado
Florida
Demonstration
Location
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Rocky Flats, CO
(Region 8)
Summitville, CO
(Region 8)
Brandon, FL
Peak Oil Superfund
Site
(Region 4)
Hialeah, FL
General Electric
Service Shop
Pensacola, FL
American Creosote
Works
(Region 4)
Pensacola, FL
Escanbia Wood
Preserving Site
(Region 4)
Technology
JMC
Environmentalist's
Subsoil Probe
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
In-situ Reactive
Barrier
Multiple
Innovative
Passive mine
Drainage
Technologies
Infrared
Incinerator
In-situ
Solidification/
Stabilization
Filtration
Soil Washing
Contact
Clements
Associates, Inc.
IA
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
John Vogan
519-824-0432
Region 8 and Sate
of Colorado
Victor Kettellapper
303-312-6578
Grupo Italimprese
(Ecova Europa)
(formerly
ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
Geo-Con, Inc.
Monroville, PA
Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700
SBP Technologies,
Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
U.S. EPA Mobile
Volume Reduction
Unit
Cincinnati, OH
Richard Griffith
908-321-6629
Program
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
Completed
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1987
Completed
1988
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
B-7
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Georgia
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Demonstration
Location
Petroleum Products
Corporation
Miami, FL
Chickamuga, GA and
Hopkinsville, GA
(Region 4)
Warner Robins, GA
Robins AFB
(Region 4)
Pearl Harbor, HI
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9
Aberjona River
INEEL Lab
Technology
Oleofilter
Debris Washing
System
Stabilization of
Organics
PCB/Metals
Extraction from
Porous Surfaces
Electrokinetics
Electrokinetic
Flushing &
Surfactant
Flushing
Set Process for
PCBs in Soil
Sediment Core
Sampler
Phytoremediation
Contact
North American
Technologies
Aprotek
San Ramon, CA
Cathryn Wmberly
916-366-6185
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Mike Taylor
512-782-4700
WASTECH, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Benjamin Peacock
615-483-6515
EET Inc.
Bellaire, TX
Tim Tarrillion
713-662-0727
Geokinetics
CA
Steven
Clark
510-704-2940
Geokinetics and
Duke Engineering
TX
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Harry Linnemeyer
512-425-2000
Commodore
Advanced
Sciences, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Mark Jones
505-872-6803
Aquatic Research
ID
Will Young
(208) 768-2222
Argonne National
Laboratory
West Idaho Fall,
ID
Scott Lee
(208) 533-7829
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurements
Demonstration
Status
Completed
Completed
1990
Completed
1991
Completed
1997
Ongoing
Completed
1999
Ongoing
Completed
Ongoing
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Demonstration
Location
Chicago, IL
(Region 4)
Waukegan Harbor, IL
(Region 5)
Gary, IN
Indiana Harbour
(Region 5)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Technology
Hydraulic
Fracturing
Thermal
Desorption
Solvent
Extraction
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Dual Tube Liner
Soil Sampler
EMFLUX Soil
Gas Survey
System
Gore- Scrubber
Passive Soil Gas
Sampler
JMC
Environmentalist's
Subsoil Probe
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
Contact
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
William Slack
513-469-6040
SoilTech,ATP
Systems Inc.
Porter, IN
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Ionics/Resources
Conservation, Co.
Bellevue, WA
Bill Hines
206-828-2400
Simulprobe
Technologies, Inc.
CA
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
American Falls, ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Quadrel Services,
Inc.
MD
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
W. L. Gore and
Associates, Inc.
Elkton, MD
Ray Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Clements
Associates, Inc.
IA
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
B-9
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Kansas
Kentucky
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Demonstration
Location
Bendena, KS
(Region 7)
Paducah, KY
Gaseous Diffustion
Plant
(Region 4)
DOE- Paducah, KY
Fort Polk, LA
(Region 6)
Lake Charles, LA
Boston, MA
(Region 1)
Boston, MA
(Region 1)
Groveland, MA
Groveland Wells
Superfund Site
Technology
Biological
Denitrification
In- situ
Electroosmosis of
TCE in Soil/
Groundwaters
"Lasagna"
Process
Oxidation and
Vitrification
Process
Electrokinetic
Extraction
Evaporation and
Chemical
Oxidation
AMS Split Core
Sampler
Russian Peat
Borer
In- situ Vacuum
Extraction
Contact
Eco Mat, Inc.
Hayward, CA
Kim Halley
510-783-5885
Monsanto/Dupont
OH
Thomas
Holdsworth
513-569-7675
Vortec
Corporation
Collegeville, PA
James Hnat
610-489-2255
Electrokinetics,
Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Elif Acar
504-388-3992
Wheelbrator Clean
Air Systems
(formerly
Chemical Waste
Management)
Schaumburg, IL
Bob Hernquist
708-706-6900
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Aquatic Research
Instruments
ID
Will Young
208-768-2222
Terra Vac, Inc.
San Juan, PR
James Malot
787-725-8750
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1998
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
B-10
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Massachusetts
Michigan
Demonstration
Location
New Bedford, MA
(Region 1)
New Bedford, MA
(Region 1)
North Dartsmouth,
MA
Resolve Superfund
Site
(Region 1)
Adrian, MI
Anderson
Development
(Region 5)
Bay City, MI
Bay City Municipal
Landfill
(Region 5)
Buchanan, MI
Electro- Voice
(Region 5)
Detroit, MI
(Region 5)
Essexville, MI
Saginaw Bay
Confined Disposal
Facility
(Region 5)
Technology
Batch Organics
Extraction Unit
Solvent
Extraction
Thermal
Desorption
Thermal
Desorption
(physical)
Thermal Gas
Phase Reduction
Process and
Thermal
Desorption
Subsurface
Volatilization and
Ventilation
System (SVVS)
Debris Washing
System
Sediment Soil
Washing
Contact
CF Systems
Corporation
Arvada, CO
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
CF Systems
Corporation
Arvada, CO
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
OHM
Environmental
(formerly
Chemical Waste
Management Inc.)
Lombarda, IL
Dick Ayen
803-846-2413
Roy F. Weston,
Inc.
West Chester, PA
Michael Cosmos
215-430-7423
ELI Eco Logic
International, Inc.
Rockwood,
Ontario,
Canada
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
Billings &
Associates, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Gale Billings
505-345-1116
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, Ohio
Donald Sanning
513-569-7444
Bergmann, USA
Gallatin, TN
George Jones
615-230-2217
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1988
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
Completed
1990
Completed
1992
B-ll
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Michigan
Minnesota
Demonstration
Location
Grand Ledge, MI
Parsons Chemical Site
(Region 5)
Rose Township, MI
(Region 5)
St. Joseph, MI
McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)
McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)
McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)
Minneapolis, MN
Private Oil Refining
Company
(Region 5)
New Brighton, MN
Twin Cities Army
Ammunition Plant
(TCAAP)
(Region 5)
Technology
In- situ
Vitrification
Infrared
Incinerator
Submerged
Aerobic Fixed
Film Reactor
Biotreatment of
Groundwater
Soil Washing
Biological
Aqueous
Treatment System
Soil Washing/
Biological
Treatment
Removal of Lead
from Soils
Contact
Geosafe
Corporation
Richland, WA
James Hansen
509-375-0710
Grupo Italimprese
(Ecova Europa)
(formerly
ECOVA)
Jon Cioffi
206-883-1900
Allied Signal
Corporation
Des Plains, IL
Steve Lupton
708-391-3500
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie,
MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie,
MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioGenesis
Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly
BioVersal USA)
Fairfax Station,
VA
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiran
708-827-0024
COGNIS
TARRAMET
Goss, MO
Lou Magdits
573-626-3476
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1994
Completed
1987
Completed
Completed
1989
Completed
1989
Completed
1989
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
B-12
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
Demonstration
Location
St. Louis Park, MN
(Region 5)
Brookhaven, MS
Brookhaven Wood
Preserving
(Region 4)
Butte, MT
Butte-Silverbow Site
(Region 8)
Mike Horse Mine, MT
(Region 8)
St. Louis, MT
Welldon Spring
(Region 7)
Hastings, NE
(Region 7)
Battle Mountain, NV
(Region 9)
Milford, NH
Savage Superfund Site
(Region 1)
Technology
Bioventing
(air-injection)
Fungus
Treatment
Technology
Plasma Heat
Grouting
Technique
Anaerobic
Biological
Destruction of
TNT in Soil
Spray Irrigation
Biodegradation of
Cyanide
Surfactant
Enanced Aquifer
Remediation
Contact
U.S.
EPA/NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Paul McCauley
513-569-7444
U.S.
EPA/NRMRL
USDA-Forest
Products Lab
Madison, WI
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Retech, Inc.
Ukiah, CA
R.C. Eschenback
707-462-6522
Morrison Knudsen
Corporation
Boise, ID
Kathryn Levihn
Rick Raymondi
208-386-6115
J.R. Simplot
Company
Pocatello, ID
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
University of
Nebraska-
Lincoln Hasting,
NE
Ray Spalding
402-783-3931
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Caren Caldwell
303-367-8443
U.S. DOE. Duke
Engineering
G. Michael Shook
208-526-6945
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1997
Completed
1991
Completed
1991
Completed
1996
Completed
1994
Completed
1996
Completed
1998
Ongoing
B-13
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
New Jersey
New Jersey
Demonstration
Location
Plaistow, NH
(Region 1)
Edison, NJ
EPA
(Region 2)
Hillsborough, NJ
(Region 2)
Millville, NJ
Nascoilte Site
(Region 2)
Millville, NJ
Nascoilte Site
(Region 2)
Morgan ville, NJ
Imperial Oil Co., Inc.
Site
(Region 3)
Pedricktown, NJ
National Lead
Industries
(Region 2)
Technology
Biodegradation of
PCB's in Soils
Solvent
Extraction
Carver-
Greenfield
Process
Pneumatic
Fracturing,
Extraction and
Hot Gas Injection
Bioreactor
Integrated with an
Ultrafiltration
Membrane
System
ZenoGem
Process
Solidification
Removal of
Dissolved Metals
Contact
Green Mountain
Laboratories
Montpelier, VT
Adam Longee
802-223-1468
Dehydro Tech
Corporation
East Hanover, NJ
Theodore
Trowbridge
908-904-1606
Accutech, Inc.
Keyport NJ &
New Jersey
Institute of
Technology,
Newark, NJ
John Liskowitz
908-739-6444
Zenon
Environmental,
Inc.
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada
Lisa Ashton
905-639-6320
ext. 244
Zenon
Environmental,
Inc.
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Solidtech, Inc.
Houston, TX
Bill Stallworth
713-497-8558
Dynaphore/
Forager Sponge
Richmond, VA
Norman Rainer
804-288-7109
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1991
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Completed
Completed
1988
Completed
1994
B-14
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
New Mexico
New York
Demonstration
Location
Trenton, NJ
(Region 2)
Wayne, NJ
(Region 2)
Albuquerque, NM
(Region 6)
Brant, NY
Wide Beach
(Region 2)
Brockport, NY
Sweden-3 Chapman
Site
(Region 2)
Niagara Falls, NY
(Region 2)
Technology
Phytoextraction
of Metal from
Soil
Ex-situ Metal-
enhanced Abiotic
Degredation
Electrokenitic
Extraction in
Unsaturated Soils
Thermal
Desorption
Dechlorination
Biovault,
Bioventing
and Groundwater
Circulation
Biological
Treatment
Process
(multi-developer
project)
Cold Top
Vitrification
Contact
Phytotech, Inc.
Monmouth, NJ
Burt Ensley
908-438-0900
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
William
Matulewicz
609-722-6700
Sandia National
Laboratories,
Albuquerque, NM
Eric Lindgren
505-844-3820
SoilTech,ATP
Systems, Inc.
Porter, IN
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
NY State
Bioremediation
and SBP
Technologies, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
New Jersey
Institute of
Technology
(NJIT)
Newark, NJ and
Geo Tech
Development
Corporation, King
of Prussia, PA
William Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1998
Completed
1995
Completed
1999
Completed
1992
Completed
1995
Ongoing
B-15
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
North Carolina
Ohio
Demonstration
Location
Upstate NY
(Region 2)
Utica, NY
(Region 2)
Utica, NY
Town Gas Site
(Region 2)
Morrisville, NC
Koppers Site
(Region 4)
Aliance, OH
Babcock & Wilcox
Alliance Research
Center
(Region 5)
Cincinnati, OH
EPA T&E Facility
(Region 5)
Crooksville, OH
Pintail Systems, Inc.
(Region 5)
Technology
In-situ Metal-
enhanced Abiotic
Degredation
High
Temperature
Thermal
Processor
Slurry
Biodegradation
Base-Catalyzed
Destruction
(Dehalogenation)
Cyclone
Vitrification
Bioslurry Reactor
Biostabilization
of Lead
Contact
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
John Vogan
519-824-0432
Maxymillian
Technologies, Inc.
(Formerly Clean
Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
Jim Maxymillian
413-499-3050
Remediation
Technologies Inc.
(ReTec) (formerly
Mo Tec Inc.)
Pitsburgh, PA
David Nakles
412-826-3340
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
George Huffman
513-569-7341
Environmental Inc.
Blue Bell, PA
Yei-Shong Shieh
215-832-0700
Babcock & Wilcox
Alliance Research
Center
Alliance, OH
Lawrence King
216-829-7576
ECOVA
Corporation
Redmond, WA
Alan Jones
206-883-1900
Pintail Systems,
Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
1993
Completed
1991
Completed
1991
Ongoing
B-16
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Demonstration
Location
Dayton, OH
(Region 5)
DOE Fernald Facility,
OH
(Region 5)
Roseville/ Crooksville,
OH
Roseville/ Crooksville,
OH
Clackamas, OR
Portable Equipment
Co. Site
(Region 10)
Douglassville, PA
(Region 3)
Monaca, PA
Technology
Hydraulic
Fracturing
Solvent
Extraction
Envirobond Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Injection Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Chemical
Fixation/
Stabilization
Solidification/
Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Contact
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
William Slack
513-469-6040
Terra Kleen
Corporation (name
changed back from
Sevenson
Extraction
Technology, Inc.)
Del Mar, CA
Alan Cash
619-558-8762
Rocky Mountain
Remedation
Services
Jim Barthel
303-215-6620
Star Organics
Phil Clarke
214-522-0742
Advanced
Remediation
Mixing, Inc.
(formerly Chemfix
Technologies, Inc.)
Metarie, LA
Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466
Hazcon and
Funderburk &
Associates)
Apollo Beach, FL
Ray Funderburk
813-645-9620
Horsehead
Resource
Development Co.,
Inc.
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1992
Completed
1997
Completed
Completed
Completed
1989
Completed
1987
Completed
B-17
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Tennessee
Demonstration
Location
Palmerton, PA
Palmerton Zinc Pile
(Region 3)
Stroudsburg, PA
(Region 3)
Central Landfill,
RI
(Region 1)
N. Smithfield, RI
(Region 1)
Savannah River Site,
SC
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
DOE Oak Ridge
Facility
(Region 4)
Technology
Membrane
Microfiltration
Contained
Recovery of Oil
Wastes
Reverse
Osmosis: Disc-
Tube Module
Technology
AIR II
Photocatalytic
Technology for
Air Streams
High Energy
Irradiation for
Destruction of
Organics in
Aqueous
Solutions and
Sludge
Photocatalytic
Aqueous Phase
Organics
Destruction
Matrix
Freeze Barrier
Contact
E.I. DuPont
DeNemours &
Company
Newark, DE
Oberlin Filter
Company
Waukesha, WI
Ernest Mayer
302-774-2277
Western Research
Institute
Laramie, WY
James Speight
307-721-2011
ROCHEM
Separations, Inc.
Torrence, CA
David LaMonica
310-370-3160
KSE, Inc.
Amhurst, MA
James Kittrell
413-549-5506
High Voltage
Environmental
Application, Inc.
Florida
and International
University Miami,
FL
William Cooper
910-962-3450
Matrix, Inc.
London, ON
Robert Henderson
519-660-8669
Arctic Foundations
Anchorage, AK
Ed Yarmak
907-562-2741
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1990
Completed
1997
Completed
1994
Completed
1999
Completed
1994
Completed
1995
Ongoing
B-18
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Texas
Utah
Demonstration
Location
Fort Worth, TX
Carswell AFB
(Region 6)
Goldthwaite, TX
Lower Colorado River
Authority Electrical
Substation
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
Hill AFB, UT
(Region 8)
Midvale Slag, UT
Ogden, UT
Chevron Transfer
Facility
(Region 8)
Technology
Phytoremediation
ofTCEin
Groundwater
Microbial
Degradation/
Solvant
Extraction
Hot Air Injection
Radio-
frequency
Heating
Radio-
frequency
Heating
Steam Injection/
Vacuum
Extraction
Molecular
Bonding System
Phytoremediation
of Petroleum in
Soil and
Groundwater
Contact
ASC/EMR
Wright Patterson
AFB
Dayton, Ohio
Greg Harvey
513-255-7716
Envirogen, Inc.
Lawrenceville, NJ
Ronald Unterman
609-936-9300
Hrubetz
Evironmental
Services, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Michael or Barbara
Hrubetz
214-363-7833
IITRI/NUS
IITRI-Chicago, IL
and Haliburton/
NUS
Oak Ridge, TN
Clifford Blanchard
615-483-9900
KAI/HNUS
Oak Ridge, TN
Cliff Blanchard
615-483-9900
Praxis
Environmental
Services
San Francisco, CA
Dr. Lloyd Steward
415-641-9044
Solucorp
Saddleback, NJ
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Phytokinetics, Inc.
Logan, UT
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1998
Ongoing
Completed
1993
Completed
1994
Completed
1994
Completed
1997
Completed
Completed
1999
B-19
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE (continued)
State
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Various locations
in U.S.
Canada
Demonstration
Location
Roanoke, VA
ITT Night Vision
Facility
(Region 3)
Ellensburg, WA
(Region 10)
Green Bay, WI
(Region 5)
Green Bay, WI
(Region 5)
Sparta, WI
U.S. DOD
Fort McCoy
(Region 5)
10 sites around the
nation
Toronto, Canada
Toronto Port Industrial
Division
Trenton, Ontario
Domtar Wood
Preserving Site
Technology
Enhanced In- situ
Bioremediation of
Chlorinated
Compounds
Anaerobic
Biological
Destruction of
Dinoseb in Soil
AMS Split Core
Sampler
Russian Peat
Borer
MAECTITEฎ
Treatment
Process
Alternate Cover
Assessment
Program (ACAP)
Treatment Train
for Contaminated
Soils
Bioremediation
Contact
ITT Industries
Roanoke, VA
Rosann
Kryczkowski
540-362-7356
J. R. Simplot
Company
Pocatello, ID
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Art's
Manufacturing and
Supply
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Aquatic Research
Instruments
ID
Will Young
208-768-2222
Sevenson
Environmental
Services, Inc.
Munster, IN
Chuck McPheeters
219-836-0116
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Toronto Harbor
Commissioners
Toronto, Canada
Dennis Lang
416-863-2047
GRACE
Bioremediation
Technologies
Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada
Alan Seech
905-272-7480
Program
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Status
Completed
1999
Completed
July
1993
Completed
1999
Completed
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed
1992
Completed
1994
B-20
-------
Appendix C
PUBLICATIONS - INFORMATION TRANSFER PRODUCT
DESCRIPTIONS
-------
Documents from the
US EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Land Remediation & Pollution Control Division
Measuring & Monitoring Program
General Publications
SITE Program: Annual Report to Congress 1997 (EPA/540/R-98/503), and
Annual Report to Congress 1998 (EPA/540/R-99/504)
SITE Profiles, Ninth Edition (EPA/540/R-97/502), and Tenth Edition (EPA/540/R-99/500a)
Survey of Materials Handling Technologies Used at Hazardous Waste
Sites (EPA/540/2-91/010) PB91-9212832
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: - Innovation Making a Difference
(EPA/540/F-94/505)
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: - Technology with an Impact
(EPA/540/F-93/500)
Interim Status Report U.S. and German Bilateral Agreement on Remediation of Hazardous
Waste Sites (EPA/540/R-94/500) PB94-1648112
SITE Innovation on the Move (EPA/540/F-97/500)
Land Remediation & Pollution Control Division; Science and Technology to Treat
Contaminated Soils, Sludge & Sediments (EPA/504/F-98/501) PB92-2222152
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/R-92/017B) PB92-2222232
Demonstration Project Results
Accutech Remedial Systems, Inc.Pneumatic
Fracturing Extraction and Hot Gas Injec., Phase 1
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/509)
PB93-2165962
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-
93/509)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/509)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/509)
PB94-1174392
American Combustion, Inc. - Oxygen Enhanced
Incineration
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-89/008)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/008)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/008)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/008)3
AWD Technologies, Inc. - Integrated Vapor
Extraction and Steam Vacuum Stripping
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/002)
PB92-2183792
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/002)3
Babcock & Wilcox Co-Cyclone Furnace Vitrification
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-92/017A)
PB92-2222152
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/R-92/017B)
PB92-2222232
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/017)
PB93-1223152
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/017)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/011)
Bergman USA - Soil and Sediment Washing System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/075)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/075)
Biogenesis Enterprises, Inc . - Soil and Sediment
Washing Processes
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/510)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-93/510)
SITE Technology Capsule (EPA/540/SR-93/510)
Bio-Rem, Inc. - Augmented In-Situ Subsurface Biorem
Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/527)3
BioTrol - Biological Aqueous Treatment System
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-2
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-91/001)
PB92-1100482
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/001)
PB91-2279832
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/001)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/001)3
- Soil Washing System (continued)
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-
91/003a) PB92-1153102
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 Part A
(EPA/540/5-9 l/003b) PB92-1153282
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 Part B
(EPA/540/5-9 l/003c) PB92-1153362
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/003)
PB92-1152452
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/003)
PB92-2243932
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/003)3
Brice Environmental Services Corporation - Bescorp
Soil Washing System Battery Enterprises Site
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/503)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/503)
PB95-1997412
Brown and Root Environmental - Subsurface
Volatilization and Ventilation System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/529)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/529a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/529)
Canonie Environmental Services Corporation - Low
Temperature Thermal Aeration (LTTA)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/504)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/504)
CF Systems Corporation - Liquified Gas Solvent
Extraction
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-90/002)
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-
90/002a) PB90-1865032
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/002)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/002)
Chemfix Technologies, Inc. (Now Advanced
Remediation Mixing, Inc.) - Chemical
Fix ation/Stabiliz ation
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5- 89/01 la)
PB91-1276962
Technology Evauation Vol.11 (EPA/540/5-89/0lib)
PB90-2741272
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/011)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/011)
PB91-9213732
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/011 )3
Chemical Waste Management, Inc. - X-TRAX Thermal
Desorption System (Now OHM Environmental)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/502)3
Cognis, Inc. Removal of Lead from Soils
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/535)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation - Carver - Greenfield
Process
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/002)
PB92-2174622
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/002)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/002)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/002)
Dupont/Oberlin - Membrane Microfiltration System
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-90/007)
PB92-1534102
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/007)
PB92-1190232
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/007)
PB92-224352
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-90/007)3
Dynaphore, Inc. - Forager Sponge Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/522)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/522a)
PB95-2132292
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/522)
PB95-2680412
ECOVA Corporation - Bioslurry Reactor [Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of Slurry-Phase Biological Reactor for
Creosote-Contaminated Wastewater]
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/009)
PB93-2055322
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/009)
PB94-1240392
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/009)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/009)3
ELI Eco Logic International, Inc.
- GasPhase Chemical Reduction
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/522)3
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-93/522a)
PB95-1002512
Technology Evaluation Appendices
(EPA/540/R-93/522b) PB95-1002512
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/522)
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/522)
- Thermal Desorption Unit
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/504)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-94/504)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-3
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc . - Metal-Enhanced
Abiotic Degradation Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/510)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-96/503a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Kept. (EPA/540/R-96/503)
EPOC Water, Inc. - Microflltration Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/513)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/513)
Filter Flow Technology, Inc. - Colloid Polishing
Filter Method
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/501)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/501a)
PB95-1227922
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/501)
GeoTech Development Corporation - Cold Top
Vitrification
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-97/506)
Geosafe Corporation - In-Situ Vitrification
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/520)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/520a)
PB95-1771012
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/520)
CIS/Solutions, Inc. - CIS/KEY Environmental Data
Management System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/505)3
Capsule (EPA/540/SR-94/505)3
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/505)
PB95-1383192
Grace Dearborn Bioremediation Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/536)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/536a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-95/536)
Gruppa Italimpresse (developed by Shirco Infrared
Systems, Inc.) - Infrared Incineration
Technology Evaluation - Peake Oil Vol. 1
(EPA/540/5-88/002a) PB89-1259912
Technology Evaluation Report - Peake Oil Vol. 11
(EPA/540/5-88/002b) PB89-1160242
Technology Evaluation - Rose Township
(EPA/540/5-89/007a) PB89-1679022
Technology Evaluation- Rose Township Vol. 11
(EPA/540/5-89/007b) PB89-1679102
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/010)
PB89-2334232
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/007)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-88/002)3
Hazcon, Inc. (now Funderburk and Assoc.) -
Solidification Process
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/001a)
PB89-1588102
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-89/001b)
PB89-1588282
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/001)
PB89-2060312
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S 5- 89/001 )3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/001)3
High Voltage Environmental Applications, Inc.
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-96/504)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-96/504)
Horsehead Resource Development Co., Inc. - Flame
Reactor
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/005)
PB92-2058552
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/005)
PB92-2132142
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/005)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/005)
Hrubetz Environmental Services, Inc. - HRUBOUT
Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/524)3
Hughes Environmental Systems, Inc. - Steam
Enhanced Recovery Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/510)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/51 Oa)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/510)
IT Research Institute (Brown and Root Environmental,
Inc.) - Radio Frequency Heating
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/527)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/527a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/527)
International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con, Inc . - In-
Situ Solidification and Stabilization Process
Technology Evaluation Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/004a)
PB90-1941612
Technology Evaluation Appendices
(EPA/540/R-93/522b) PB95-1002512
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-89/004b)
PB89-1941792
Technology Evaluation Vol. Ill
(EPA/540/5-89/004c) PB90-2690692
Technology Evaluation Vol. IV (EPA/540/5-89/004d)
PB90-2690772
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/004)
PB90-2690852
Technology Demo. Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/004)3
Technology Demo. Summary, Update Report
(EPA/540/S5-89/004a)3
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-4
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/004)3
KAI Technologies Inc./Brown and Root
Environmental Radio Frequency Heating
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/528)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/528a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/528)
Magnum Water Technology - CAV-OX Ultraviolet
Oxidation Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/520)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/520)
PB94-1894382
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/520)
PB95-1661612
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/520)3
Matrix Photocatalytic Ltd. - Photocatalytic Aqueous
Phase Organics Destruction Process
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-97/503)
Maxymillian Technologies (formerly Clean
Berkshires, Inc.) - Thermal Desorption System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/507)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/507a)
PB95-1228002
New Jersey Institute of Technology - Cold Top
Vitrification Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-97/506)
New York State Multi-Vendor Bioremediation:
- ENSR Consulting & Engineering/Larson
Engineers - Ex-Situ Biovault
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/524)
- R.E. Wright Environmental Inc. - In-Situ
Bioremediation System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/525)
North American Technologies Group, Inc. - SFC
Oleofiltration System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/525)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/525a)
PB95-1672272
Innovative Tech. Eval. Rept. (EPA/540/R-94/525)
Ogden Environmental Services, Inc. (now General
Atomics) - Ogden Circulating Bed Combustor
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/001)3
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/001)
PB92-2272892
Peroxidation Systems, Inc. (now Calgon Carbon
Oxidation Technologies) - Perox-Pure Chemical
Oxidation
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/501)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/501)
PB94-1303252
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/501) PB93-
2135282
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/501)3
Resources Conservation Company - The Basic
Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) - Solvent
Extraction
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/079)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/079)
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-92/079a)
PB93-2271222
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 1
(EPA/540/R-92/079b) PB93-2271302
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 2
(EPA/540/R-92/079c) PB93-2271482
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11, Part 3
(EPA/540/R-92/079d) PB93-2271552
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/079)
Retech, Inc. - Plasma Centrifugal Furnace (Plasma Arc
Vitrification)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-91/007)
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-91/007a)
PB92-2160352
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-91/007b)
PB92-2160432
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-91/007)
PB92-2187912
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/007)
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
- and IT Corporation - Debris Washing System
Technology Evaluation-Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-9l/006a)
PB91-2314562
TechnologyEvaluationVol.il (EPA/540/5-9l/006b)
PB91-2314642
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-91/006)3
- and University of Cincinnati-Hydraulic Fracturing of
Contaminated Soil
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/505)3
Technology Evaluation and Applications Analysis
Combined (EPA/540/R-93/505) PB94-1001612
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/505)3
-and USDA-Forest Products Technology - Fungal
Treatment Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/514)3
-Mobile Volume Reduction Unit at the Sand Creek
Superfund Site
Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/512)3
-Mobile Volume Reduction Unit at the Escambia
Superfund Site
Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/511 )3
-Volume Reduction Unit
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-5
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/508)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/508)
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/508)3
PB94-1362642
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/508)
Rochem Separations Systems, Inc. - Disc Tube
Modle Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-96/507)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-96/507a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-96/507)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
-and IEG Technologies-Unterdruck-Verdampfer-
Brunner Technology (UVB) Vacuum Vaporizing
Well
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/500)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/500a)
- Low Temperature Thermal Treatment (LT3)
System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/019)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/019)
Sandia National Labs - In Situ Electrokinetic
Extraction System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-97/509)
SBP Technologies, Inc. - Membrane Filtration and
Bioremediation
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/014)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/014)
Silicate Technology Corporation (Now STC Omega)
- Solidification/Stabilization of Organic/Inorganic
Contaminants
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/010)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/010)
PB93-1729482
Silicate Technology Corporation (Now STC Omega)
- Solidification/Stabilization of Organic/Inorganic
Contaminants (continued)
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/010) PB95-
2557092
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/010)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/514a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/514)
Simplot, J.R. - Ex Situ Anaerobic Bioremediation
Technology: TNT
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/529)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/529a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/529)
Simplot, J.R. - Ex-Situ Anaerobic Bioremediation
System (The SABRE Process)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/508)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/508a)
Soiltech ATP Systems, Inc.
-Aostra-SoilTech Anaerobic Thermal Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/008)
-SoilTech Anaerobic Thermal Processor
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/078)3
Soliditech, Inc. - Solidification and Stabilization
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/005a)
PB90-1917502
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/5-89/005b)
PB90-1917682
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/005)
PB91-1298172
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/005)3
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/005)3
Solucorp - Molecular Bonding System
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-97/507)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-94/508)
Sonotech, Inc. - Cello Pulse Combustion Burner System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/502)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/502a)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/502)
TerraKleen Response Group, Inc. - Solvent Extraction
Treatment System
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/521 )3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-94/521a) PB95-2136172
Terra Vac, Inc. - In Situ Vacuum Extraction
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/003)3
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/5-89/003a)
PB89-1920252
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-93/517) PB93-
2160672
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/517)
Texaco, Inc. - Entrained-Bed Gasification Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-94/514)
Thorneco, Inc. - Enzyme - Activated Cellulose
Technology
Treatability Study Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/018)3
TechnologyEvaluationVol.il (EPA/540/5-89/003b)
PB89-1920332
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/003)
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/003)3
Toronto Harbour Commission - Soil Recycling
Treatment Train
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-92/015)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/517)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-6
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Toxic Treatments USA, Inc. (Now NOVATERRA,
Inc.) - In-Situ Steam/Hot Air Stripping
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-90/003)
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-90/008)
Ultrox, a Division of Zimpro Environmental, Inc. -
UV Ozone Treatment for Liquids
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/M5-89/012)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/A5-89/012)
PB91-1297592
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/5-89/012)
PB90-1981772
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/S5-89/012)3
U.S. EPA - McColl Super fund Site - Demonstration
of a Trial Excavation
Technology Evaluation (EPA/540/R-92/015)
PB92-22644822
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-92/015)
PB93-1001212
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/015)
Wheelabrator Clean Air Systems, Inc. (formerly
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.) -
PO*WW*ER Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-93/506)3
Applications Analysis (EPA/540/AR-93/506)
Technology Evaluation -Vol. 1 (EPA/540/R-
93/506a) PB94-1606372
Technology Evaluation Vol. 11 (EPA/540/R-
93/506b) PB94-1606602
Technology Demo Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/506)
Zenon Environmental, Inc. - Zenon Cross-
FlowPervaporation Technology
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/511)
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/511 a)
Zenon Environmental Systems - Zenogem
Wastewater Treatment Process
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/503)3
Capsule (EPA/540/R-95/503a)3
Emerging Technologies Program Reports
General Publications
SITE Emerging Technology Program (Brochure) (EPA/540/F-95/502)
ABB Environmental Services, Inc. - Two Zone PCE
Bioremediation System
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/510)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-7
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Aluminum Company of America - Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emission from Soil,
Water, and Air Decontamination Process
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/507)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/521)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/521)
PB93-2270252
Journal Article AWMA Vol. 44, No. 3, March 1994
Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited - Chemical
Treatment and Ultrafiltration
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/002)3
Babcock & Wilcox Co. - Cyclone Furace (Soil
Vitrification)
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/010)
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/507)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/507)
PB93-1630382
Batelle Memorial Institute - In Situ Elecroacoustic
Soil Decontamination
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/S5-90/004)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/5-90/004)
PB90-2047282
Bio-Recovery Systems Inc. - Removal and Recovery
of Metal Ions from Groundwater (AlgaSORB)
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/003)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/S5-90/005)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/5-90/005a) PB90-
252S942
Emerging Tech. Report - Appendices
(EPA/540/5-90/005b) PB90-2526022
Biotrol, Inc. - Mehanotophic Bioreator System
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/506)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/505)3
Journal Article AWMA Vol. 45, No.l, Jan. 1995
Center for Hazardous Materials Research
-Acid Extraction Treatment System for Treatment
of Metal Contaminated Soils
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-94/513)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-94/513)
PB94-1881092
-Simulatanious Destruction of Organics and
Stabilization of Metals in Soils
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-98/500)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-98/500)
PB98-133150
-Reclamation of Lead from Superfund Waste
Material Using Secondary Lead Smelters
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/510)
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-95/504)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-95/504)
PB95-1990222
Colorado School of Mines - Constructed Wetlands-
Based Treatment
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/001)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/523)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-93/523)
PB93-2339142
University of Dayton Research Institute - Development
of a Photothermal Detoxification Unit
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/505)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-95/526)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-95/526)
PB95-2557332
Electro-Pure Systems, Inc. - Alternating Current
Electyrocoagulation Technology
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/011)3
Emerging Tech Summary (EPA/540/S-93/504)3
Journal Article AWMA Vol 43, No.5, May 1993
Electokinetics Inc. - Theoretical and Experimental
Modeling of Multispecies...Electrokinetic Soil Processing
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/504)
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/600/SR-97/054)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/600/R-97/054)
PB97-1930562
Energy and Environmental Engineering - Laser-
Induced Photochemical Oxidative Destruction
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/004)
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-92/080)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-92/080)
PB93-1314312
Energy and Environmental Research Corporation -
Hybrid Fluidized Bed System
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/508)
FERRO Corporation - Waste Vitrification Through
Electric Melting
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/503)
Florida International University (or Electron Beam
Research Facility)
-Electron Beam Treatment for Removal of Benzene and
Toluene from Aqueous Streams and Sludge
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/502)3
-Electron Beam Treatment for the Trichloroethylene
and Tetrachloroethylene from Aqueous Stream
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/009)3
-Removal of Phenol from Aqueous Solutions Using
High Energy Electron Beam Irradation
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/509)3
Institute of Gas Technology
-Chemical and Biological Treatment (CBT)
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/504)3
-Fluid Extraction-Biological Degradation Process
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/F-94/501)3
IT Corporation - Innovative Methods for Bioslurry
Treatment
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-96/505)
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-96/505)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/ R-96/505)
PB97-1768202
IT Corporation - Photolysis/Biodegradation of PCB
and PCDD/PCDF Contaminated Soils
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/502)
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-94/531)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-94/531)
PB95-1599922
IT Corporation - Process for the Treatment of
Volatile Organic Carbon & Heavy-Metal
Contaminated Soil
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/509)
J.R. Simplot - Anaerobic Destruction of
Nitroaromatics (the SABRE Process)
Journal Article App. Env. Micro, Vol.58, No. 5,
May 1992, pp. 1683-89
Matrix Photocatalitic, Inc. - Photocatalytic Water
Treatment
Published Paper (EPA/600/A-93/282)
PB94-1301842
New Jersey Institute of Technology - GHEA Associates
Process for Soil Washing and Wastewater Treatment
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/509)
PURUS, Inc. - Photolytic Oxidation Process
[Destruction of Organic Contaminants in Air Using
Advanced Ultraviolet Flashlamps]
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/501)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/516)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/ R-93/516)
PB93-2053832
Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Ambersorb 563 Adsorbent
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-95/500)
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-95/516)
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-95/516)
PB95-2641642
University of Washington - Metals Treatment at
Superfund Sites by Adsorptive Filtration
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-92/008)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-93/515)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/ R-93/515)
PB93-2311652
Vortec Corporation - Vitrification
Published Paper, Glass Production Technol International,
1994, p. 103 - 106
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/S-97/501)4
Wastewater Technology Centre - [A] Cross-Flow
Pervaporation System [for Removal of VOC's from
Contaminated Water]
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-93/503)3
Emerging Tech. Summary (EPA/540/SR-94/512)3
Emerging Tech. Report (EPA/540/R-94/512)
PB94-1702302
Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. - Volatile
Organic Compound Removal from Air Streams by
Membrane Separation
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/503)
M.L. Energia - Reductive Photo-Dechlorination
Process for Safe Conversion of Hazardous
Chlorocarbon Waste Streams
Emerging Tech. Bulletin (EPA/540/F-94/508)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-9
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Measuring and Monitoring Program Reports
Cone Penetrometers
Loral Rapid Optical Screening Tool (ROST)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/519)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/519)
Site Characterization Analysis Penetrometer System
(SCAPS)
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/520)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/R-95/520)
Field Portable X-Ray Fluorescence
HNU Systems SEFA-P Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/144)
Metorex X-Met 920P and 940 Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/146)
Metorex X-Met 920MP Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/151)
Niton XL Spectrum Field Portable X-ray Fluorescence
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/150)
SciTec MAP Spectrum Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/147)
TN Spectrace TN9000 and TN Pb Field Portable X-ray
Fluorescence Analyzers
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-97/145)
Portable Gas Chromatographs
Analytical & Remedial Technology Purge and Trap Gas
Chromatographic Manifod System (AVOS)
Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/R-93/109)
Bruker Mobiel Environmental Monitor
Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/X-91 /079)
Field Analytical Screening Program (FASP) Method
for PCP
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/R-95/528)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/MR-95/528)
Field Analytical Screening Program (FASP) Method
for PCB
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/R-95/521)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/MR-95/521)
HNU Portable Gas Chromatograph
Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
Photovac Portable Gas Chromatograph
Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
Sentex Portable Gas Chromatograph
Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
SRI Instruments Low Temperature Thermal
Desorption System
Results reported in the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA
Third International Field Screening Symposium
Volume 2, Pages 682-693 (1993)
Spectrometers
MDA Scientific Long-Path Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectrometer
Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/S3-91/071)
Xontech, Inc. Canister-based Sector Sample
Report (EPA/600/S3-91/071)
PCP/PCB Immunoassay Test Kits
Char-N-Soil PCB Test Kit - Dexel
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's
Center for Environmental Research Information
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695.
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and
must be ordered by that number at cost from:
C-10
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield VA 22161
Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
3 Out of stock
-------
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/518)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/518)
EnviroGard PCB Test Kit - Millipore Inc.
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/517)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/517)
Millipore Immunoasay Test Kit for PCB
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/517)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/517)
PCP Immunoassay Technologies: Ensys Inc. - PENTA
Rise: Ohmicron Corp., - Penta RaPid; Millipore Inc. -
Envirogard
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/515)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/514)
U-Hanby PCP Test Kit
Demonstration Bulletin (EPA/540/MR-95/515)
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/540/ R-95/515)
Westinghouse PCP Test Kit
Technology Evaluation Report (EPA/600/X-90/146)
Soil & Soil Gas Samples
Art's Manufacturing Soil Sampler
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/093)
Clements & Associates Soil Sampler
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/097)
Geoprobeฎ Soil Sampler
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/092)
Simulprobeฎ Soil Sampler
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/094)
Quandrel Soil Gas Sampler
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/096)
W.L. Gore & Associates Soil Gas Sampler
Innovative Tech. Eval. Report (EPA/600/R-98/095)
1 Order documents free of charge by calling EPA's National Technical Information Service
Center for Environmental Research Information 5285 Port Royal Road
(CERI) at 513-569-7562 or Fax 513-569-8695. Springfield VA 22161
2 Documents with a PB number are out of stock and Telephone 703-487-4650 or 1-800-553-6847
must be ordered by that number at cost from: 3 Out of stock
C-ll
-------
Appendix D
ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL INFORMATION RESOURCES
-------
EPA Sources of Information on
Innovative Remediation and Site Characterization Technologies
Listed below are U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sources of information on Innovative Remediation
and Site Characterization Technologies. Sources of information include: electronic information sources in the form of
databases or Internet sites, as well as programs, partnerships and organizations accessible on the Internet.
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Information Sources
Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center
(ATTIC). The Alternative Treatment Technology
Information Center (ATTIC) is a comprehensive computer
database system that provides up-to-date information
about innovative treatment technologies. The database
contains information about biological, chemical, and
physical treatment processes; solidification and
stabilization processes; and thermal treatment
technologies. The on-line automated bibliographic
reference integrates existing data on hazardous waste into
a unified searchable resource. The ATTIC system
provides users with access to several independent
databases, an electronic bulletin board system, a hotline,
and a repository of publications related to alternative and
innovative treatment technologies. The ATTIC database
can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Bioremediation in the Field Search System (BFSS)
Version 2.1. BFSS is a PC-based searchable database of
information about greater than 450 sites at which
bioremediation is being tested or implemented or at which
cleanup by bioremediation has been completed. The
database covers sites being addressed under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA), as well as those being addressed under the
Underground Storage Tank (UST) Program. Information is
available about location, media, contaminants,
technology, cost and performance. BFSS can be
downloaded free of charge from the ATTIC or the
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Internet
sites at .
Completed North American Innovative Remediation
Technology Demonstration Projects Database. The
searchable database contains information about more than
300 completed innovative technology field
demonstration projects in North America. The purpose of
the database is to consolidate key information from
innovative demonstration projects into a single source
and present that information in a format that enables the user
to easily identify innovative technologies that may be
appropriate to the user's particular site remediation needs.
The database, which is limited to completed demonstration
projects and a small number of full-scale cleanup efforts,
does not include emerging technologies or laboratory-scale
projects. The database can be downloaded free of charge
from the CLU-IN Internet site at .
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Home
Page. CLU-IN is a streamlined source of information about
innovative remediation and site characterization
technologies for hazardous waste cleanup professionals. It
provides access to information about programs,
organizations, publications, and other tools for EPA and
other Federal and State personnel, consulting engineers,
technology developers and venders, remediation
contractors, researchers, community groups, and individual
citizens. Access to various pools of information is presented
in the form of downloadable publications and databases.
Sources of additional information on the Internet also are
presented through a series of links. CLU-IN is sponsored by
EPA's Technology Innovation Office (TIO). For additional
information about the CLU-IN home page, call (301) 589-
5318. CLU-IN can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status
Report (Ninth Edition) This contains information about
remedies selected at contaminated waste sites. The sites
include Superfund remedial and removal sites and some
non-Superfund sites being remediated by the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Department of
Defense (DoD), or under the RCRA corrective action
program. The EPA REACHIT online system database
includes such site-specific data as contaminants and media
treated, project status, and site contact. If you have
questions or comments about the system, please call EPA's
TIO at (703) 589-5318. The database can be downloaded
free of charge from the CLU-IN Internet site at . To obtain a copy of the report, call EPA's National
Center for Environmental Publications and Information
(NCEPI) at (800) 490-9198 or (513) 489-8190.
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and
Reference Guide, Version 3.0. The Remediation
Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide,
D-3
-------
Version 3.0, prepared for federal agencies participating on
the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FRTR),
provides a "yellow pages" of remediation technologies
information. The guide is intended to assist remedial
project managers (RPM) to screen and evaluate candidate
cleanup technologies and select the best remedial
alternative(s) for contaminated installations, facilities, or
waste sites. The guide also assists environmental
professionals in gathering essential descriptive
information on the respective technologies. The guide
incorporates cost and performance data to the maximum
extent available and focuses primarily on demonstrated
technologies. However, information on emerging
technologies also is included in the guide. The guide can
be accessed through the Internet at .
TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIO, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies is available through this Internet
subscription service. Approximately once a month, the
service distributes by electronic mail a message describing
the availability of publications and announcements of
events. For publications, the message explains how to
obtain a hard copy or how to download an electronic
version from the Internet. For additional information
about TechDirect, contact Jeff Heimermann at (703) 603-
7191 or by E-mail aiheimerman.jeff@epamail.epa.gov.
TechDirect can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations
EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library's holdings. The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches
by author, title, or keyword. The EPA National Library
Network Program can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR).
FRTR is an interagency working group that provides a
forum for the exchange of information regarding the
development and demonstration of innovative
technologies for the remediation of hazardous waste sites.
The forum also synthesizes the technical knowledge that
Federal Agencies have compiled and provides a more
comprehensive record of performance and cost of the
technologies. Participating agencies include DoD, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air
Force, DOE, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and EPA.
FRTR can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis
Center (GWRTAC). GWRTAC was established through a
cooperative agreement between the National Environmental
Technology Applications Center (NETAC) of the Center for
Hazardous Materials Research (CHMR) and EPA. The goal
of GWRTAC is to compile, analyze, and disseminate
information about innovative ground-water remediation
technologies to industry, the research community,
contractors, government, investors, and the public. The
center currently is compiling information to be included in
databases of interactive case studies and vendor information
that will be available on the GWRTAC Internet site.
GWRTAC can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Office of Research and Development (ORD). ORD, under
the Assistant Administrator, Norine E. Noonan, Ph. D., is the
scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised of three
headquarters offices, three national research laboratories and
two national centers, ORD is organized around a basic
strategy of risk assessment and risk assessment management
to remediate environmental and human health problems.
ORD focuses on the advancement of basic peer-reviewed
scientific research and the implementation of cost-effective,
common sense technology. Fundamental to ORD's mission
is a partnership with the academic scientific community
through extramural research grants and fellowships to help
develop the sound environmental research necessary to
ensure effective policy and regulatory decisions. ORD also
implements such programs as the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on
treatment technologies and EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on
site characterization technologies. ORD can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF).
RTDF was established by EPA to foster public-private
partnerships that would conduct laboratory and applied
research to develop, test, and evaluate innovative
remediation technologies. RTDF's home page provides
access to information about various remediation
technologies currently being designed, developed and
evaluated through seven action teams of RTDF including:
the Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Consortium, the
LASAGNA Partnership, the Permeable Reactive Barriers
Action Team, the Sediments Remediation Action Team, the
In-Place Inactivation and Natural Ecological Restoration
Technologies (IINERT) Soil-Metals Action Team, the
Phytoremediation of Organics Action Team, and the In Situ
Flushing Action Team. RTDF can be accessed through the
Internet at .
D-4
-------
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for
the remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring
and measurement. Through the program, technologies are
field-tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering
and cost data are gathered on the innovative technology
so that potential users can assess the technology's
applicability to a particular site. Data collected during the
field demonstrations are used to assess the performance of
the technology, the potential need for pre- and post-
processing of the waste, applicable types of wastes and
waste matrices, potential operating problems, and
approximate capital and operating costs. The collected
information is then provided in a Innovative Technology
Evaluation Report, Technology Capsule, and
Demonstration Bulletin. These reports evaluate all
available information on the technology and analyze its
overall applicability to other site characteristics, waste
types, and waste matrices. Testing procedures,
performance and cost data, and quality assurance and
quality standards also are presented. The SITE
Demonstration program can be accessed through the
Internet at .
Technology Innovation Office (TIO). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIO was
created in 1990 to act as an advocate for new
technologies. TIO's mission is to increase the application
of innovative treatment technologies to contaminated
waste sites, soils, and groundwater. To meet that mission,
TIO has expanded its focus from treatment technologies to
include site characterization technologies in order to
improve the remediation process. TIO has encouraged and
relied on cooperative ventures with other partners to
accomplish many of its goals. This effort to effectively
use resources has led to numerous joint efforts that have
enhanced the state of both remediation and site
characterization. For additional information about TIO,
contact Jeff Heimerman of EPA's TIO at (703) 603-7191.
TIO can be accessed through the Internet at
.
SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Sources of Information
EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory -
Hazardous Waste Site Characterization (on CD-ROM)
(EPA 600-C-96-001). The Hazardous Waste Site
Characterization CD-ROM, developed by NERL's ESD-
L V, compiles guidance documents and related software to
aid environmental professionals in the complex,
multidisciplinary, characterizing of hazardous waste sites.
The CD-ROM is a compilation of computer programs related
to EPA's RCRA and Superfund programs that can be printed,
as well as searched by key words. Using the CD-ROM
requires a personal computer with DOS Version 3.0 or
higher, 640K of Ram, and 3 MB of hard disk space. A math
co-processor is recommended but not required. The CD-
ROM can be ordered on-line through the NTIS Internet site
at .
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix. The
Matrix, developed by participating agencies of the Federal
Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR), is a matrix
and reference guide that is intended to provide users with an
understanding of the site characterization technologies
available to them and the applicability of various
technologies to their particular problem(s). The Matrix
provides a general understanding of state-of-the-art
technologies for site characterization. The Matrix and
reference guide also enhances technology information
transfer and provides much needed comparison among
competing technologies. The Matrix can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-EN) Home
Page. CLU-IN is a streamlined source of information about
innovative remediation and site characterization
technologies for hazardous waste cleanup professionals. It
provides access to information about programs,
organizations, publications, and other tools for EPA and
other Federal and State personnel, consulting engineers,
technology developers and venders, remediation
contractors, researchers, community groups, and individual
citizens. Access to various tools of information is presented
in the form of downloadable publications and databases.
Sources of additional information on the Internet also are
presented through a series of links. CLU-IN is sponsored by
EPA's Technology Innovation Office (TIO). For additional
information about the CLU-IN home page, call (301) 589-
5318. CLU-IN can be accessed through the Internet at
.
TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIO, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies are available through this Internet subscription
service. Approximately once a month, the service
distributes by electronic mail a message describing the
availability of publications and announcements of events.
For publications, the message explains how to obtain a hard
copy or how to download an electronic version from the
Internet. For additional information about TechDirect,
contact Jeff Heimermann at (703) 603-7191 or by E-mail at
heimerman.jeff@epamail.epa.gov. TechDirect can be
accessed through the Internet at
D-5
-------
.
Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations
Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology
(CSCT). CSCT was established as one of 12 pilot projects
currently implemented by EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) Program. The CSCT is a
partnership program among the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Defense
(DoD), and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that is
responsible for evaluating and verifying the performance
of innovative site characterization technologies. The
CSCT provides support to technology developers,
evaluates and verifies data generated during
demonstrations, and develops and disseminates
information about the performance of site characterization
technologies. CSCT can be accessed through the Internet
at .
Environmental Technology Verification Program. The
ETV program seeks to provide credible performance data
on environmental technologies from independent third
parties under the auspices of EPA. It verifies the
performance of innovative technical solutions to problems
that threaten human health or the environment. Managed
by EPA's ORD, ETV was created to substantially
accelerate the entrance of new environmental technologies
into domestic and international marketplaces. It supplies
buyers of technologies, developers of those technologies,
consulting engineers, states, and EPA regions with high-
quality data on the performance of new technologies.
ETV expands on past verification efforts, such as those
conducted under the SITE program for remediation
technologies. ETV currently implements 10 pilot
projects, including the Consortium for Site
Characterization Technology (CSCT). The ETV program
can be accessed through the Internet at
.
EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library's holdings. The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches
by author, title, or keyword. The material on OLS is
updated every two weeks. The EPA National Library
Network Program can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Office of Research and Development (ORD). ORD, under
the Assistant Administrator, Norine E. Noonan, Ph. D., is
the scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised
of three headquarters offices, three national research
laboratories and two national centers, ORD is organized
around a basic strategy of risk assessment and risk
assessment management to remediate environmental and
human health problems. ORD focuses on the advancement
of basic peer-reviewed scientific research and the
implementation of cost-effective, common sense
technology. Fundamental to ORD's mission is a partnership
with the academic scientific community through extramural
research grants and fellowships to help develop the sound
environmental research necessary to ensure effective policy
and regulatory decisions. ORD also implements such
programs as the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on treatment
technologies and EPA's Environmental Technology
Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on site
characterization technologies. ORD can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for the
remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring and
measurement. Through the program, technologies are field-
tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering and
cost data are gathered on the innovative technology so that
potential users can assess the technology's applicability to a
particular site. Data collected during the field
demonstrations are used to assess the performance of the
technology, the potential need for pre- and post-processing
of the waste, applicable types of wastes and waste matrices,
potential operating problems, and approximate capital and
operating costs. The collected information is then provided
in a Innovative Technology Evaluation Report, Technology
Capsule, and Demonstration Bulletin. These reports evaluate
all available information on the technology and analyze its
overall applicability to other site characteristics, waste
types, and waste matrices. Testing procedures, performance
and cost data, and quality assurance and quality standards
also are presented. The SITE Demonstration program can be
accessed through the Internet at
.
Technology Innovation Office (TIO). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIO was created
in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies. TIO's
mission is to increase the application of innovative
treatment technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils,
and groundwater. To Meet that mission, TIO has expanded
its focus from treatment technologies to include site
characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process. TIO has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish
D-6
-------
many of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources of EPA's TIO at (703) 603-7191. TIO can be accessed
has led to numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the through the Internet at
state of both remediation and site characterization. For .
additional information about TIO, contact Jeff Heimerman
D-7
-------
CONTENTS
Section Page
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES D-3
Electronic Information Sources D-3
Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center (ATTIC) D-3
Bioremediation in the Field Search System (BFSS) Version 2.1 D-3
Completed North American Innovative Remediation Technology
Demonstration Projects Database D-3
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Home Page D-3
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Ninth Edition)
and REACHIT Online System D-3
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 3.0 D-4
TechDirect D-4
Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations D-4
EPA Library Network Program D-4
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR) D-4
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC) D-4
Office of Research and Development (ORD) D-4
Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) D-4
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program D-5
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) D-5
SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES D-5
Electronic Sources of Information D-5
EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory - Hazardous Waste
Site Characterization (on CD-ROM) (EPA 600-C-96-001) D-5
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix D-5
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Home Page D-5
TechDirect D-5
Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations D-6
Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology (CSCT) D-6
Environmental Technology Verification Program D-6
EPA Library Network Program D-6
Office of Research and Development (ORD) D-6
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program D-6
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) D-7
D-2
------- |