-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
TABLE 4-3
Unit 1 Baseline Study
Copeland Compressor Test Summary-All Temperatures
EER at ARI Conditions 9.4 BTU/W-h
Condensing unit CFM 3000 CFM (Listed)
Capacity at ARI 4.96 tons
Coil Area 15 sq-ft
Predicted EER = 7.40
Test Date
ApriM2-C
April 14-C
AprN12-C
July 8-C
April 28-C
July 8-C1
April 10-C1
April 28-C2
June 2-C3
July 8 C4
April 9-C1
April 28-C2
July 8-C3
May 08-C
May 08-C
May 08-C
May 08-C
POSTADSIL
August 21 -C
August 20-C
August 23-C
August 20-C
August 20-C
August 20-C
August 10-C
August 21 -C
August 10-C
August 6-C
August 6-C
August 1 8-C
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
64
66
71
82
83
83
84
84
84
84
85
85
85
88
90
90
92
OAT
73
81
82
83
85
85
85
86
87
89
91
90
EWB
57
56
57
58
55
53
57
55
56
55
57
59
56
58
55
59
59
EWB
59
59
63
60
60
65
57
59
58
60
60
65
El
79%
103%
79%
81%
80%
80%
83%
81%
86%
84%
81%
83%
83%
83%
83%
85%
84%
83.4%
El
83%
84%
88%
84%
89%
89%
88%
85%
92%
92%
96%
92%
88.5%
Cl
72%
103%
71%
75%
72%
73%
76%
73%
78%
77%
72%
76%
78%
77%
77%
81%
78%
77.0%
Cl
74%
76%
84%
78%
81%
81%
79%
78%
82%
87%
91%
88%
81.6%
EER
9.8
12.5
9.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.5
8.3
7.9
8.2
8.1
7.9
7.6
8.0
7.9
EER
9.4
8.7
9.2
8.5
8.8
9.2
8.6
8.3
9.0
8.9
9.1
8.5
kW
4.6
5.0
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
5.5
4.7
5.5
4.7
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.8
4.7
kW
4.6
4.6
4.8
4.7
4.7
5.6
5.5
4.6
5.5
5.8
5.8
5.8
Change 6.1% 6.0%
Physical Power and Capacity Measurements
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
66
66
71
85
83
85
84
84
84
82
85
85
86
86
90
90
95
inlet
72
79
82
83
84
82
84
85
82
89
89
90
83.42
exhaust
89
88
96
107
105
106
107
107
106
106
108
108
109
108
111
116
115
exhaust
96
102
106
107
107
108
107
108
105
114
115
115
107.50
Cond Air
DT(K)
12.8
12.2
13.9
12.2
12.2
11.7
12.8
12.8
12.2
13.3
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.2
11.7
14.4
11.1
12.6
DT(K)
13.3
12.8
13.3
13.3
12.8
14.4
12.8
12.8
12.8
13.9
14.4
13.9
13.38
kW
4.8
4.6
4.8
5.3
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.6
5.4
kW
4.8
5.1
5.3
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.2
5.3
5.2
5.5
5.6
5.6
5.29
(kg/sec)
1.06
1.76
1.06
2.16
1.42
2.10
1.06
1.81
1.08
2.10
1.06
1.81
2.04
2.19
2.30
2.22
2.47
1.7
(kg/sec)
2.96
2.94
2.92
2.99
2.92
2.98
3.01
2.98
3.06
2.93
3.02
2.99
2.97
tons
3.87
6.16
4.21
7.55
4.98
7.00
3.87
6.61
3.79
8.0
3.87
6.62
7.5
7.66
7.68
9.17
7.86
tons
11.31
10.74
11.12
11.39
10.66
12.32
11.01
10.88
11.17
11.62
12.49
11.87
11.38
EER
9.68
16.06
10.52
17.10
11.72
16.16
8.76
15.26
8.75
18.52
8.93
15.29
16.87
17.03
17.07
19.65
17.46
14.4
EER
28.27
25.28
25.18
26.29
24.14
27.38
25.41
24.63
25.77
25.35
26.77
25.43
25.83
6.3% 70.1% 79.3%
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil PrqjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
4-12
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Table 4-3. Unit 1 Baseline Study, Copeland Compressor Test Summary-All Temperatures (continued)
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions | Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
OAT
64-C
66-C
71 -C
82-C
83-C
83-C1
84-C1
84-C2
84-C3
84-C3
85-C1
85-C2
85-C3
88-C
90-C
90-C1
92-C
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
4.6
3.61
9.8
5.0
5.12
12.5
4.6
3.45
9.0
4.7
3.50
8.2
4.7
3.26
8.0
4.7
3.30
8.0
4.7
3.48
8.23
4.6
3.29
7.97
5.5
3.54
8.46
4.7
3.47
8.26
5.5
3.28
7.94
4.7
3.52
8.20
4.8
3.53
8.11
4.7
3.49
7.91
4.7
3.38
7.65
4.8
3.66
7.95
4.7
3.49
7.91
CU
4.800
3.87
9.68
4.600
6.16
16.06
4.8
4.21
10.52
5.3
7.55
17.10
5.1
4.98
11.72
5.2
7.00
16.16
5.3
3.87
8.76
5.2
6.61
15.26
5.2
3.79
8.75
5.2
8.02
18.52
5.2
3.87
8.93
5.2
6.62
15.29
5.3
7.45
16.87
5.4
7.66
17.03
5.4
7.68
17.07
5.6
9.17
19.65
5.4
7.66
17.03
Lit
4.85
5.01
12.40
4.92
4.97
12.12
5.09
4.86
11.45
5.50
4.66
10.17
5.46
4.52
9.94
5.46
4.52
9.94
5.54
4.58
9.91
5.50
4.50
9.83
5.52
4.54
9.83
5.50
4.50
9.83
5.58
4.56
9.81
5.63
4.63
9.88
5.56
4.52
9.77
5.70
4.53
9.53
5.71
4.39
9.22
5.79
4.52
9.35
5.76
4.54
9.46
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
95%
72%
79%
102%
103%
103%
90%
71%
79%
85%
75%
81%
86%
72%
80%
86%
73%
80%
85%
76%
83%
84%
73%
81%
100%
78%
86%
86%
77%
84%
99%
72%
81%
84%
76%
83%
86%
78%
83%
82%
77%
83%
82%
77%
83%
83%
81%
85%
82%
77%
84%
CU/Lit
99%
77%
78%
93%
124%
133%
94%
87%
92%
96%
162%
168%
93%
110%
118%
95%
155%
163%
96%
85%
88%
95%
147%
155%
94%
83%
89%
95%
178%
188%
93%
85%
91%
92%
143%
155%
95%
165%
173%
95%
169%
179%
95%
175%
185%
97%
203%
210%
94%
169%
180%
SA/CU
96%
93%
101%
109%
83%
78%
96%
82%
86%
89%
46%
48%
92%
65%
68%
90%
47%
49%
89%
90%
94%
88%
50%
52%
106%
93%
97%
90%
43%
45%
106%
85%
89%
90%
53%
54%
91%
47%
48%
87%
46%
46%
87%
44%
45%
86%
40%
40%
87%
46%
46%
Test Data
SA
6.0
3.6
7.4
6.4
5.1
9.7
5.7
3.5
7.4
5.4
3.7
7.6
5.4
3.6
7.5
5.4
3.6
7.5
5.4
3.8
7.8
5.3
3.6
7.6
6.3
3.9
8.1
5.4
3.8
7.9
6.2
3.6
7.6
5.3
3.8
7.8
5.5
3.9
7.8
5.2
3.8
7.8
5.2
3.8
7.8
5.2
4.0
8.0
5.2
3.8
7.9
CU
6.2
3.8
7.4
5.9
6.1
12.5
6.0
4.3
8.7
6.1
8.0
15.8
5.9
5.5
11.1
6.0
7.7
15.3
6.0
4.2
8.3
6.0
7.3
14.6
6.0
4.1
8.4
6.0
8.8
17.7
5.9
4.2
8.6
5.8
7.1
14.6
6.0
8.2
16.3
6.0
8.4
16.8
6.0
8.7
17.4
6.1
10.1
19.8
5.9
8.4
17.0
Literature
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
95%
72%
79%
102%
103%
103%
90%
71%
79%
85%
75%
81%
86%
72%
80%
86%
73%
80%
85%
76%
83%
84%
73%
81%
100%
78%
86%
86%
77%
84%
99%
72%
81%
84%
76%
83%
86%
78%
83%
82%
77%
83%
82%
77%
83%
83%
81%
85%
82%
77%
84%
CU/Lit
99%
77%
78%
93%
124%
133%
94%
87%
92%
96%
162%
168%
93%
110%
118%
95%
155%
163%
96%
85%
88%
95%
147%
155%
94%
83%
89%
95%
178%
188%
93%
85%
91%
92%
143%
155%
95%
165%
173%
95%
169%
179%
95%
175%
185%
97%
203%
210%
94%
169%
180%
SA/CU
96%
93%
101%
109%
83%
78%
96%
82%
86%
89%
46%
48%
92%
65%
68%
90%
47%
49%
89%
90%
94%
88%
50%
52%
106%
93%
97%
90%
43%
45%
106%
85%
89%
90%
53%
54%
91%
47%
48%
87%
46%
46%
87%
44%
45%
86%
40%
40%
87%
46%
46%
Predicted/SA
-
-
99%
-
-
76%
-
-
99%
-
-
97%
-
-
98%
-
-
98%
-
-
95%
-
-
97%
-
-
91%
-
-
94%
-
-
97%
-
-
95%
-
-
95%
-
-
95%
-
-
95%
-
-
92%
-
-
94%
Predicted/CU
-
-
101%
-
-
59%
-
-
86%
-
-
47%
-
-
67%
-
-
48%
-
-
89%
-
-
51%
-
-
88%
-
-
42%
-
-
86%
-
-
51%
-
-
45%
-
-
44%
-
-
42%
-
-
37%
-
-
44%
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil PrqjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
4-13
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Table 4-3. Unit 1 Baseline Study, Copeland Compressor Test Summary-All Temperatures (continued)
73-C
81 -C
82-C
83-C
85-C
85-C1
85-C2
86-C
87-C
89-C
91 -C
90-C Clean
Evap
POST ADSIL
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
4.6
3.64
9.37
4.6
3.59
8.68
4.8
4.14
9.20
4.7
3.68
8.52
4.7
3.78
8.83
5.6
4.09
9.19
5.5
3.60
8.63
4.6
3.60
8.31
5.5
3.74
9.02
5.8
3.96
8.86
5.8
4.16
9.11
5.8
3.98
8.54
4.8
11.31
28.27
5.1
10.74
25.28
5.3
11.12
25.18
5.2
11.39
26.29
5.3
10.66
24.14
5.4
12.32
27.38
5.2
11.01
25.41
5.3
10.88
24.63
5.2
11.17
25.77
5.5
11.62
25.35
5.6
12.49
26.77
5.6
11.87
25.43
5.23
4.92
11.29
5.49
4.73
10.33
5.66
4.93
10.45
5.58
4.72
10.14
5.65
4.67
9.92
5.87
5.05
10.33
5.58
4.56
9.81
5.66
4.61
9.77
5.58
4.56
9.81
5.67
4.55
9.63
5.78
4.57
9.49
5.85
4.52
9.28
88%
74%
83%
84%
76%
84%
85%
84%
88%
84%
78%
84%
83%
81%
89%
95%
81%
89%
99%
79%
88%
81%
78%
85%
99%
82%
92%
102%
87%
92%
100%
91%
96%
99%
88%
92%
92%
230%
250%
93%
227%
245%
94%
226%
241%
93%
241%
259%
94%
228%
243%
92%
244%
265%
93%
242%
259%
94%
236%
252%
93%
245%
263%
97%
255%
263%
97%
273%
282%
96%
262%
274%
96%
32%
33%
90%
33%
34%
91%
37%
37%
90%
32%
32%
89%
35%
37%
104%
33%
34%
106%
33%
34%
87%
33%
34%
106%
33%
35%
105%
34%
35%
104%
33%
34%
104%
34%
34%
5.6
3.7
7.8
5.3
3.8
7.9
5.4
4.2
8.3
5.3
3.9
7.9
5.3
4.0
8.4
6.0
4.0
8.4
6.2
3.9
8.3
5.1
3.9
8.0
6.2
4.1
8.7
6.5
4.3
8.7
6.3
4.5
9.0
6.3
4.4
8.7
5.8
11.4
23.6
5.9
11.3
23.1
5.9
11.2
22.7
5.9
12.0
24.4
5.9
11.3
22.9
5.8
12.1
25.0
5.9
12.0
24.4
5.9
11.7
23.7
5.9
12.1
24.8
6.1
12.7
24.8
6.1
13.5
26.6
6.1
13.0
25.8
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
6.32
4.96
9.42
88%
74%
83%
84%
76%
84%
85%
84%
88%
84%
78%
84%
83%
81%
89%
95%
81%
89%
99%
79%
88%
81%
78%
85%
99%
82%
92%
102%
87%
92%
100%
91%
96%
99%
88%
92%
92%
230%
250%
93%
227%
245%
94%
226%
241%
93%
241%
259%
94%
228%
243%
92%
244%
265%
93%
242%
259%
94%
236%
252%
93%
245%
263%
97%
255%
263%
97%
273%
282%
96%
262%
274%
96%
32%
33%
90%
33%
34%
91%
37%
37%
90%
32%
32%
89%
35%
37%
104%
33%
34%
106%
33%
34%
87%
33%
34%
106%
33%
35%
105%
34%
35%
104%
33%
34%
104%
34%
34%
-
-
95%
-
-
94%
-
-
89%
-
-
94%
-
-
88%
-
-
88%
-
-
89%
-
-
92%
-
-
85%
-
-
85%
-
-
82%
-
-
85%
-
-
31%
-
-
32%
-
-
33%
-
-
30%
-
-
32%
-
-
30%
-
-
30%
-
-
31%
-
-
30%
-
-
30%
-
-
28%
-
-
29%
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil PrqjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
4-14
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
TABLE 4-4
Unit 1 Baseline Study
Copeland Compressor Test Summary at Ambient of 85 Degrees or Higher
(Maximum of 1 Test Per Temperature)
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
9.4 BTU/W-h
3000 CFM (Listed)
4.96 tons
15 sq-ft
7.40
Test Date
April 9-C1
May 08-C
May 08-C
May 08-C
POSTADSIL
August 20-C
August 20-C
August 21-C
August 10-C
August 6-C
August 6-C
August 18-C
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
85
88
90
92
OAT
85
85
86
87
89
91
90
EWB
57
58
55
59
EWB
60
65
59
58
60
60
65
El
81%
83%
83%
84%
82.8%
El
89%
89%
85%
92%
92%
96%
92%
90.7%
Cl
72%
77%
77%
78%
76.0%
Cl
81%
81%
78%
82%
87%
91%
88%
84.0%
EER
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EER
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
kW
5.5
4.7
4.7
4.7
kW
4.7
5.6
4.6
5.5
5.8
5.8
5.8
Physical Power and Capacity Measurements
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
85
86
90
95
inlet
84
82
85
82
89
89
90
85.86
exhaust
108
108
111
115
exhaust
107
108
108
105
114
115
115
110.29
Cond Air
DT(K)
12.8
12.2
11.7
11.1
DT(K)
12.8
14.4
12.8
12.8
13.9
14.4
13.9
13.57
kW
5.2
5.4
5.4
5.4
kW
5.3
5.4
5.3
5.2
5.5
5.6
5.6
5.41
(kg/sec)
1.06
2.19
2.30
2.47
(kg/sec)
2.92
2.98
2.98
3.06
2.93
3.02
2.99
2.98
tons
3.87
7.66
7.68
7.86
tons
10.66
12.32
10.88
11.17
11.62
12.49
11.87
11.57
EER
8.93
17.03
17.07
17.46
EER
24.14
27.38
24.63
25.77
25.35
26.77
25.43
25.64
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_ Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil PrqjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
4-15
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 4-12 shows the variability in measuring the efficiency index of the unit pre-treatment over the
temperature range of 73 degrees to 92 degrees. Figure 4-13 shows the same indices for the post-
treatment unit. Results of this inspection show more uniform results after Adsil treatment. Figure 4-14
shows the indices for temperatures of 85 degrees or higher. Inspection of these graphs indicate that the
efficiency index, a measure of the actual efficiency divided by the benchmark efficiency of the unit when
new, increases with increasing temperatures. This increase is observed to be more pronounced after the
Adsil application.
Unit 2 Protocol
This unit was evaluated eight times prior to the Adsil application. The ambient temperature ranged from
83 degrees to 92 degrees F and the return air wet bulb temperature varied from 54 degrees to 57 degrees
F during the testing period from May 2004 through August 2004. The blower air flow was held constant
and the average condenser air flow was observed to increase after Adsil treatment. The complete test
results are presented in Appendix C. Figure 4-15 provides the initial assessment of the unit prior to
Adsil treatment.
Two testing procedures were used in each of the eight evaluations. The first procedure was the
condenser test measurement described in Section 3.2. The second test was the generic compressor
Service Assistant test. The generic test uses a generic compressor curve to determine the operating
efficiency of a condenser based on the measurements described in Section 3.3.
This unit was not cleaned prior to initiation of pre-Adsil testing. After completion of pre-testing, the unit
was cleaned and coated per Adsil protocol on August 3, 2004. Post-Adsil testing began at this time and
continued through August 31, 2004. Seven tests were conducted post-treatment and comparisons were
made to the pre-test process.
Condenser Heat Rejection and Power Measurement
The protocol for this procedure is described in Section 3.2 of this report. Per this procedure the power
consumption was observed to increase as temperature increased, as shown in Figure 4-16 and Table 4-5.
It may also be seen in these two figures that the slope of the post-Adsil treatment curve is less than the
pre-treatment curve suggesting that power consumption on this tested unit decreased after treatment.
The intercept for this phenomenon occurs at approximately 84 degrees F.
A comparison of the measured EER using this procedure shows great variation prior to and after Adsil
application. EER values ranged from 7.6 to 11.2 for all temperature ranges before application and from
9.7 to 13.9 after application. This variation is due primarily to very inconsistent fan flow measurements
as may be seen in Table 4-5. The average pre-application flow rate was measured to be 3.91 kg/sec with
a range of 3.33 kg/sec to 4.63 kg/sec. Post-treatment the fan flow rate averaged 4.47 kg/sec with a range
between 4.07 kg/sec and 4.92 kg/sec.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-16 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 4-12 Unit 1 Baseline Study
Efficiency Index (El) vs OAT for Pre-ADSIL Tests, All Temperatures
<\
\
OQC
OQ
.y
DJ 0.85
00
.0
Oyc
07
A * * *
mm mmmm—~mmm^L^E' ^
*
*pre generic
pre copeland
. / i
70 80 90 100
OAT (F)
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: _CDM_
Figure 4-13 Unit 1 Baseline Study
Efficiency Index (El) vs OAT for Post-Adsil Tests, All Temperatures
-i
i
OOC:
.yo
On
.y
77", n KC,
Ul U.OO
00
.0
07£
. / 0
07
^^£5^
^^
• post generic
x post copeland
70 80 90 100
OAT (F)
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by :_TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-17
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 4-14 Unit 1 Baseline Study
Efficiency Index (El) vs OAT For Pre- & Post-Adsil Tests, Temps Above 85 F
0.95
w 0.9
0.85
85
90
OAT (F)
95
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-18
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 4-15 Unit 2 Baseline Study
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation at ARI Conditions
Manufacturer: Carrier Published EER: 67.0
Model Number: 38YCC060 Calculated EER: 9.2
Serial Number Nominal Capacity: 4.64
Equipment Type: SS Heat pump Age 3
Year Manufactured: 2001 Coil Conditon 3%
Location MACTEC Hendrickson Present Condition EER 9.0
Tag HP-7 kW/ton 1.33
Compressor Data
Running load Amps: 17.0 Amps Power supply: 3-phase
Nameplate Voltage: 230 Volts Phase adjustment: 1.73
Power factor: 0.86 Compressor quantity: 1
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps: 1.40 Amps Power supply: 1-Phase
Nameplate Voltage: 230 Volts Phase adjustment: 1
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70 Fan quantity: 1
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40 Amps Power supply: 1-Phase
Nameplate Voltage: 230 Volts Phase adjustment: 1
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11 Fan quantity: 1
Calculated compressor load: 5.8 kW
Calculated condensing fan load: 0.23 kW
Calculated evaporator fan load 0.13 kW
Total calculated load for equipment: 6.04 kW - Condensing side only
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment 3.2% Performance Degradation
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average X
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean 0.9
Dirty 0.1
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New 1
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough 0.5
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New x
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu x
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CUOnly)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by :_TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEGVEnergy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-19
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 4-16 Unit 2 Baseline Study
Power Consumption vs OAT, All Temperatures
A Q
A £
A 7
A R
5 4=i -
> 4.5
4.4
A ^
4 9
A 1
•1
Pre Adsil \ ^^
J^, —
* *^.--J^^.- — *
^
*^l*fS^+ ^^~~~ Post Adsil
^— • t**'
*Pre-Adsil Fluke kW
• Post- Adsil Fluke kW
80 85 90 95
OAT (F)
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-20
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
The average EER gain using this methodology was determined to be 17% for all tested
temperatures as shown in Table 4-5. The variations of the flow rates tend to invalidate the results
of this protocol for this unit. Figure 4-17 shows the trend of the EER to increase post-treatment
with increasing ambient temperatures.
Service Assistant Test Description for Generic Compressor Model
The results for this procedure are summarized in Table 4-5. The Service Assistant test for Unit 2
showed an average operating efficiency of 96% for tests conducted prior to Adsil application.
For these tests the efficiency index (El) ranged from 95% to 98% and tended to increase with
increasing ambient temperature. After application, Unit 2 had an average operating El of 97%.
The post-treatment range varied from 94% to 99% and tended to increase with increasing ambient
temperature. The EER for Unit 2 had an average increase of 1% over the range of ambient
conditions tested. Figure 4-18 shows the linear profile of the EER over this range and suggests
that the unit performance (for pre- and post-Adsil applications) tends to converge around 83 F.
The average Service Assistant capacity for pre- and post-Adsil™ applications decreased from
4.18 to 4.16 tons of cooling over the range of tested ambient conditions. The capacity measured
tends to converge with increasing ambient temperature and has an average difference of negative
0.54%. The Service Assistant capacity measurement results are presented in Table 4-5.
Summary of Test Results for Unit 2
Both test procedures showed a measurable increase in EER for Unit 2. Figure 4-19 presents the
results of tests at all temperatures. The results show an increase in EER % change for the Service
Assistant test with increasing ambient temperature, and a decrease in % EER change for the
condenser test with increasing ambient temperatures.
Figure 4-20 shows the variability in measuring the efficiency index of the unit for pre- and post-
treatment over the tested temperature ranges. Inspection of these graphs indicate that the
efficiency index, a measure of the actual efficiency divided by the benchmark efficiency of the
unit when new, increases with increasing temperatures. This increase is observed to be more
pronounced after the Adsil application.
Conclusions-Units 1 and 2
Test results at temperatures of 85 degrees or greater are considered to be more accurate and viable
for the process. The Service Assistant methodology was determined to be the most accurate
method for measuring the EER of FfVAC equipment.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-21 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 4-17 Unit 2 Baseline Study
Condenser EER Test vs OAT, All Temperatures
• Pre-Adsil Condenser EER
• Post Adsil Condenser EER
OAT (F)
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: _CDM_
Figure 4-18 Unit 2 Baseline Study
Generic Compressor EER vs OAT, All Temperatures
10
;= 9.5
a:
8.5
Post-Adsil
Pre-Adsil
80
85
90
OAT (F)
95
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-22
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 4-19 Unit 2 Baseline Study
Change in EER after Adsil Treatment
All Temperatures
0.25
0.23
0.21
0.19
0.17
0.15
0.13
0.11
0.09
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.01
-0.01
85
90
95
OAT (F)
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
Figure 4-20 Unit 2 Baseline Study
Efficiency Index (El) vs OAT for Pre-ADSIL Tests, All Temperatures
n QQ
n Qft
n QT
n QR
n QA
n Q^
n CM
OQ
• ^-'**
Post-Adsil v .^'^
\. j^^ ^
^ — ^ * \Pre-Adsil
^^
»Pre-Adsil El
• Post-Adsil El
80 85 90 95
OAT (F)
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-23
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Comparison with Data Logger Evaluation
Traditional measurements of HVAC efficiency have been conducted by collecting data over an
extended period of time. This method is believed to be the most accurate for measuring true
operating efficiency of HVAC equipment, if the equipment is instrumented properly and sensors
are accurate. Ideally, actual air flow and enthalpy changes across the evaporator will be collected
and compared to the true power required to produce this cold air flow. Actual power
measurements require that the voltage, amperage, and power factor be measured.
In the comparison test performed at a commercial property in Clearwater near the Florida west
coast, a Carrier 12-1/2-ton, dual-compressor package unit was chosen. Instrumentation of this
unit was performed by a third party and the analysis of the data was also performed by a third
party. This report is included as Appendix D in this report. The third party testing began on
April 27, 2004 with the unit, RTU-2, being instrumented. On May 5, 2004 the unit was cleaned
and coated per standard operating procedures of the owner. On May 19, 2004, the unit was
cleaned and coated per the Adsil process.
Data collection was conducted from April 27 through May 31, 2004. Unfortunately, the actual
power was not measured, only the amperage; constant values of 0.85 for power factor and 208
volts for the voltage were assumed and used to estimate the power. Capacity measurements were
not made although the data could be used to determine capacity if compressor curves and tables
were incorporated in the calculation procedure. The unit had dual compressors which further
complicated the measurement process since the cycling of the second compressor had significant
impacts to both the power consumption and the condenser efficiency.
Refrigerant temperature drop across the condenser, ambient temperature, and refrigerant low and
high side pressures were recorded; however, capacity measurements of the condenser were not
provided by the third party study. Consequently, EER values were not determined by this third
party study complicating the comparison process. The study did provide a multiple linear
regression model to determine the daily energy variation with ambient temperature for the unit
pre-and post-treatment. Based on the results of this comparison, the energy savings resulting
from the treatment process were 3.9%.
MACTEC performed our standard Service Assistant and condenser efficiency determinations for
this same unit. By using jumper cables on the panel board we manually controlled the
compressor operation to energize both the first and second stage during our testing. We did pre-
treatment testing on May 13 (ambient temperature of 78 degrees) and post-treatment testing on
July 21 (ambient temperature of 88 degrees). The data and results of this test may be seen in
Appendix D. The Service Assistant test showed a 20.6% increase in EER and the condenser test
showed a -5.9% change in efficiency.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-24 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Conclusions
The low ambient temperature pre-test (78 degrees) during MACTEC's pre-treatment test has been
shown to have the potential to skew test data (see the Unit 1 Baseline Study in Section 4 of this
report). For this reason MACTEC believes that the results of our Service Assistant test are not
reliable for this site. The condenser test was conducted on a roof where there were measurable
breezes present, compromising the integrity of the flow measurements. The third party
evaluation predicted a 3.9% savings in energy consumption but used assumptions which, in
MACTEC's experience could skew the range of predicted savings by as much as 150%, giving a
potential range of between -2% and 10% as the bounds on savings.
MACTEC does not think that conclusive results regarding this comparison were obtained.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
4-25 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
TABLE 4-5
Unit 2 Baseline Study
Generic Compressor Test Summary-All Temperatures
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unitCFM
Capacity at ARI
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
9.27 BTU/W-h
3300 CFM (Listed)
4.67 tons
22 sq-ft
9.07 BTU/W-h
Test Date
PRE
POST
24-May
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1 6-Aug
1 6-Aug
11-Auq
11-Aug
31-Aug
31-Aug
31-Aua
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
92
89
88
88
87
86
84
b3
Averages
91
89
89
85
82
88
bb
EWB
57
55
55
54
54
56
54
bb
57
54
59
59
57
54
b/
El
98%
96%
97%
95%
96%
97%
95%
9b%
96%
99%
99%
98%
96%
94%
97%
9/%
Cl
98%
95%
97%
93%
94%
96%
93%
92%
95%
98%
96%
94%
95%
90%
93%
93%
EER
8.83
9.01
9.24
9.04
9.27
9.52
9.58
9./3
9.05
9.28
9.24
9.60
9.80
9.23
9.26
Cap
4.24
4.16
4.26
4.08
4.14
4.26
4.15
4.13
4.18
4.26
4.20
4.13
4.25
4.07
4.08
4.1U
kW
5.60
5.60
5.60
5.51
5.51
5.51
5.51
b.42
5.51
5.51
5.42
5.51
5.80
5.80
b.bU
Averages 97% 94% 4.16
Change 1.1% -0.64% -0.54%
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
94
90
87
88
87
86
86
82
90
87
87
86
84
90
b9
exhaust
110
105
103
102
103
100
100
99
105
103
105
101
99
105
1U4
Cond Air
Ul (K.)
8.9
8.3
8.9
7.8
8.9
7.8
7.8
9.4
8.47
8.3
8.9
10.0
8.3
8.3
8.3
b.3
kW
4.81
4.64
4.66
4.60
4.64
4.42
4.44
4.33
4.61
4.65
4.62
4.46
4.3
4.57
4.b/
(kg/sec)
4.63
4.20
3.90
3.75
3.94
3.33
3.70
3.b1
3.91
4.53
4.40
4.92
4.48
4.24
4.61
4.U/
tons
11.76
10.01
9.92
8.35
10.02
7.40
8.23
1U.29
10.81
11.20
14.09
10.67
10.10
10.98
9. /U
EER
29.35
25.89
25.55
21.78
25.90
20.09
22.23
28.52
24.92
28.13
28.90
36.59
28.72
28.18
28.84
ZD.4/
cfm adj
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
U.3b
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
U.3b
8.65 4.47 29.26 0.38
2.11% 14.29% 17.45%
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - vldi
4-26
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
5. Measurements in EER
The majority of the units evaluated in this study were under preventive maintenance programs.
As part of these programs, coils are reported to be regularly cleaned. No specific cleaning of the
coils was performed by MACTEC or Adsil prior to commencement of pre-treatment testing.
Many of the units were graded out to be very clean according to MACTEC's site inspection,
supporting the claims for regular coil cleanings. The impact of cleaning alone on the
performance of these units is not addressed in this report.
In previous sections of this report it was determined that the Service Assistant testing
methodology was the most accurate and reliable form of instantaneous efficiency measurement
procedure. This section of the report will address the results of EER measurement in the SEQL
area. Unless otherwise specified, results recorded here are based on the Service Assistant
methodology.
Initially there were 150 units included in the proposed SEQL area sample. In calendar year
2003, prior to MACTEC's involvement, 75 of these units were coated with Adsil, effectively
eliminating them from the subject population. MACTEC inspected each of the remaining 75
units and successfully completed testing on 45 of these units. The reasons for not testing the
other 30 units included the size (either too large or too small for the instruments we were using);
lack of electrical power disconnect at the unit; and inability to get the unit(s) to operate.
Many of these units contained a single compressor and circuit. These units were the most
straight-forward to test and data was collected and analyzed as described in the baseline tests.
Other variations included multiple compressors with a common condenser, evaporator and power
source; dual compressors in a single package unit with each compressor having a dedicated
condenser but sharing the same evaporator circuit and power; and dual compressors sharing a
common condenser, evaporator, and power disconnect. A description of how each of these types
of equipment was analyzed is presented below.
Multiple Compressors. Common Condenser Circuit
Many of the package Trane units encountered at York Technical College possessed this
configuration. Two or more compressors discharged into a common manifold which went into a
single condenser coil. When only one stage was energized, the efficiency of this type of unit is
higher than when both compressors are energized. All power measurements were made at the
local disconnect and included all operating compressors and condenser fans as well as the blower.
In most cases all compressors were energized during both pre- and post-treatment testing. The
recorded tonnage was equal to the tonnage of the active compressors. All pre- and post-treatment
tests were conducted with the same compressor configuration operating. If conditions could not
P:\EEG\Energy\EPAAdsilProject\FinalReport\EPAAdsilFinalReportwithedits -v2.doc 5~ 1 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
be replicated in the post-treatment test, the data was marked invalid and was not used in this
report.
Dual Compressors. Dedicated Condenser
Many of the York package units encountered at the Monroe Aquatic Center possessed this
configuration. A single package unit contained two independent circuits housed in separate
compartments with individual condenser fans and condenser housings with an intertwined
evaporator circuit. These units shared a single power source. In some cases both compressors
were energized and both circuits were independently measured and analyzed. In other cases only
one circuit was energized. Pre- and post-treatment tests were conducted on the same number of
circuits so as to ensure reliability of test measurements. Recorded tonnage was the nameplate
value of the unit. In most cases both circuits were energized.
Multiple Compressors. Shared Condenser
Some of the units, including those at the York Technical College Library, had this configuration.
In the event that only one stage is energized the condenser may work more efficiently than if both
compressors are energized since the rejected heat from one circuit is not partially absorbed by the
2nd circuit as when both are energized. Pre- and post-treatment tests were conducted identically
and in most cases both circuits were energized.
Results-All Tests
A total of 395 tons of HVAC equipment was tested in this sample of 45 units over a temperatures
range of 70 to 96 degrees. The average increase in EER is presented in Table 5-1. The most
significant number presented in the table is the increase in EER for the ton-weighted average.
This value is seen to be 9.9% with a standard error of 1.5%.
Results-Valid Tests at All Temperatures
The validity of 15 of the tests was questionable due to several changes in conditions which were
considered to be significant. These included nine (9) units with low refrigerant charge; one (1)
unit which had refrigerant added after the first test; and five (5) tests with differing condenser and
compressor operation. After eliminating these conditions, 30 tests were deemed valid
representing a total of 287 tons of HVAC equipment tested over a temperatures range of 70 to 96
degrees. Table 5-2 summarizes the results of these 30 tests. The ton-weighted average EER
improvement was determined to be 11.3% with a standard error of 1.8%.
Results-Valid Tests at Literature Temperatures
The validity of 15 of the tests was questionable due to tests being conducted at temperatures
below those published in the performance data for the HVAC equipment. Different
manufacturers rate their equipment over different temperature ranges with data being available
for all of the units at temperatures of 85 degrees and above. Data was available at temperatures
above 75 degrees on only three of the units and at temperatures above 80 degrees on only four of
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc 5 ~2 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
the units. The most rigorous presentation of results requires that the results of these tests be
eliminated since the determination of efficiency below the supplied data requires assumptions and
extrapolations which may or may not be accurate. Additionally, test results in our baseline
testing indicate that results are more significant when ambient temperatures exceed 85 degrees.
After eliminating these conditions, 15 tests were deemed valid representing a total of 107 tons of
HVAC equipment tested over a temperatures range of 85 to 94 degrees. A summary of these test
results is provided in Table 5-3.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
5-3 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
TABLE 5-1
Summary of All Tests at All Temperatures
Site
Concord Admin
Concord City Hall
Granite Quarry
Iredell Health Center
Locust City Hall
Monroe Aquatic Center
Monroe Aquatic Center
YTC Bid D
YTC- Hood Center
YTC - Library
YTC - Library
YTC Student Center
YTC Student Services
YTC Truck School
Unit
RTU-5
RTU-7
RTU-1
RTU-2
RTU-3
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
RTU-1
RTU-1 3
RTU-1 4
RTU-3
SS-1
SS-2
RTU-2
RTU-2
RTU-4
RTU-5
RTU-6
RTU-8
RTU-9
RTU-1 0
RTU-1 3
RTU-1 5
RTU-1 6
RTU-1
RTU-1 0
RTU-5
RTU-6
RTU-7
RTU-8
RTU-9
HP-1
HP-2
Unit 1
Unit 2
Ground
RTU-25
HP-1
SS-1
Age
6
6
5
5
5
2
5
2
11
7
13
9
3
12
12
12
12
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
2
2
4
13
12
13
13
13
12
4
12
13
13
Un10
13
13
15
Per Unit
Ton-Weighted
Pre-test Post-test
OAT OAT
93 93
92 93
81 87
86 89
86 88
85 88
87 92
91 89
93 89
88 87
79 95
77 94
77 92
87 79
87 80
88 80
83 79
93 87
94 89
88 91
85 88
90 85
93 84
95 88
97 85
88 87
85 89
92 93
94 79
96 80
88 85
77 NA
80 77
84 78
70 85
76 78
76 90
79 82
77 74
75 85
77 88
81 84
84 86
74 83
85 86
Service Assistant
Tons
tested
8
9
5
5
5
5
6
4
2
3
5
5
5
3
5
6
3
3
3
7
7
5
5
5
21
12
8
21
7
5
4
24
24
29
24
18
23
3
5
17
17
24
5
7
9
Pre-Adsil
EER
11.76
10.19
11.76
11.76
11.88
11.30
9.45
10.67
7.61
9.06
8.47
7.95
9.11
9.70
9.20
NA
9.70
12.55
11.87
11.14
10.58
8.58
7.82
11.19
8.96
7.91
10.71
9.07
10.52
8.11
7.09
6.35
9.62
9.99
7.65
11.63
9.18
9.84
7.03
8.53
9.25
7.84
7.89
10.14
10.44
Post Adsil
EER
11.76
10.78
12.00
12.48
12.48
12.13
9.97
10.01
7.69
8.34
8.66
9.79
NA
10.17
9.79
10.76
9.89
12.98
12.51
11.03
11.14
9.23
8.91
10.75
10.24
9.12
11.87
11.63
10.92
8.57
9.55
NA
9.72
9.89
10.56
12.41
10.36
10.78
8.22
9.45
8.53
8.89
8.40
12.15
11.40
% Change
0.0%
5.8%
2.0%
6.1%
5.1%
7.3%
5.6%
-6.3%
1.1%
-7.9%
2.2%
23.2%
NA
4.9%
6.4%
NA
2.0%
3.4%
5.4%
-1.0%
5.3%
7.6%
13.9%
-3.9%
14.3%
15.3%
10.9%
28.2%
3.8%
5.6%
34.7%
NA
1.0%
-1 .0%
38.0%
6.7%
12.8%
9.5%
16.9%
10.7%
-7.7%
13.5%
6.6%
19.8%
9.2%
Ton
weighted
avg.
0.0%
54.1%
10.7%
32.0%
26.4%
40.0%
31 .7%
-23.9%
2.5%
-21 .8%
10.5%
115.9%
NA
14.5%
33.1%
NA
5.8%
10.2%
16.1%
-7.5%
39.4%
39.9%
73.0%
-20.4%
295.9%
182.2%
83.0%
584.8%
28.3%
29.3%
138.7%
NA
24.0%
-27.9%
922.9%
122.7%
291 .2%
27.1%
81 .4%
185.2%
-133.0%
325.9%
34.1%
146.4%
84.4%
Condensing
Tons
tested
8.41
9.31
5.23
5.23
5.23
5.48
5.71
3.83
2.35
2.75
4.78
5.00
5.00
2.97
5.19
6.30
2.97
3.00
3.00
7.49
7.49
5.25
5.25
5.25
20.71
11.88
7.63
20.71
7.44
5.21
4.00
23.98
23.98
28.74
24.30
18.41
22.67
2.84
4.82
17.29
17.29
24.17
5.19
7.40
9.19
Pre-Adsil
EER
17.45
47.97
NA
NA
NA
14.79
15.61
22.24
18.70
NA
NA
NA
NA
19.79
17.58
18.59
22.41
NA
NA
24.54
16.44
14.03
16.59
19.36
8.09
18.84
19.25
15.57
26.63
22.06
NA
11.72
21.13
NA
NA
19.76
13.15
15.47
NA
7.42
6.00
NA
NA
NA
10.91
Post Adsil
EER
36.04
56.62
NA
NA
NA
27.07
27.88
21.75
19.83
NA
NA
NA
NA
32.96
21.62
17.54
20.42
NA
NA
22.68
24.28
20.07
16.34
24.02
20.18
17.47
22.05
23.30
23.52
21.93
NA
9.32
16.08
NA
NA
17.04
24.74
25.34
NA
15.81
15.15
NA
NA
NA
14.82
% Change
106.6%
18.0%
NA
NA
NA
83.0%
78.6%
-2.2%
6.1%
NA
NA
NA
NA
66.6%
23.0%
-5.7%
-8.9%
NA
NA
-7.6%
47.6%
43.1%
-1.5%
24.0%
149.5%
-7.3%
14.5%
49.7%
-1 1 .6%
-0.6%
NA
-20.5%
-23.9%
NA
NA
-13.7%
88.1%
63.8%
NA
113.2%
152.3%
NA
NA
NA
35.9%
Ton
weighted
avg.
896.6%
167.9%
NA
NA
NA
455.2%
448.9%
-8.4%
14.3%
NA
NA
NA
NA
197.5%
119.1%
-35.7%
-26.3%
NA
NA
0.6%
18.8%
17.2%
-1.1%
-4.9%
442.3%
-13.2%
12.1%
290.4%
-3.3%
-0.2%
NA
-491.1%
-573.3%
NA
NA
-253.1%
1997.4%
181.2%
NA
1956.7%
2633.7%
NA
NA
NA
329.4%
Spreadshee
Pre-Adsil
EER
10.50
11.32
11.65
11.19
11.14
11.35
9.84
10.77
7.05
7.43
NA
NA
NA
8.00
8.51
9.18
8.06
11.65
11.65
10.74
10.74
10.39
10.17
10.17
9.35
9.39
10.70
9.98
10.19
9.25
8.04
8.59
8.85
7.96
8.08
7.81
9.21
8.93
8.76
8.82
9.08
7.19
9.10
9.57
9.13
Post Adsil
EER
11.08
11.62
11.88
11.88
11.88
12.01
10.39
11.32
7.49
8.70
NA
NA
NA
8.80
9.06
9.96
8.80
11.88
11.88
10.81
10.83
10.56
10.56
10.56
10.19
10.22
10.77
10.44
10.21
9.26
9.45
8.82
8.85
8.89
8.93
8.86
9.53
9.37
9.16
9.32
9.32
8.23
9.51
10.23
9.60
35.28 (tons not counted)
395.01 8.02%
standard deviation 9.7%
count 42
standard error 1.5%
9.90%
137.83 (tons not counted)
292.46 36.6%
standard deviation 43.5%
count 29
standard error 8.1%
30.0%
standard deviation
count
standard error
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_ Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil PrqjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
5-4
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Table 5-2
Summary of Valid Tests at All Temperatures
Site
Concord Admin
Concord City Hall
Iredell Health Center
Locust City Hall
Monroe Aquatic Center
Monroe Aquatic Center
YTC Bid D
YTC- Hood Center
YTC - Library
YTC Student Center
YTC Student Services
YTC Truck School
Unit
RTU-7
RTU-2
RTU-3
SS-1
SS-2
SS-4
SS-5
RTU-1
RTU-13
RTU-3
SS-2
RTU-1
RTU-2
RTU-9
RTU-1 0
RTU-13
RTU-1 5
RTU-1 6
RTU-1
RTU-5
RTU-6
RTU-7
RTU-8
RTU-9
HP-1
HP-2
Unitl
RTU-25
HP-1
SS-1
Age
6
5
5
2
5
11
7
12
12
12
7
7
7
7
7
7
2
2
4
12
13
13
13
12
4
12
13
13
13
15
P re-test
OAT
92
86
86
85
87
93
88
87
87
83
94
94
85
88
85
92
94
96
88
80
84
70
76
76
79
77
75
84
74
85
Per Unit
Ton-Weighted
Post-test
OAT
93
89
88
88
92
89
87
79
80
79
89
91
88
87
89
93
79
80
85
77
78
85
78
90
82
74
85
86
83
86
Service Assistant
Tons
tested
9
5
5
5
6
2
3
3
5
3
3
7
7
12
8
21
7
5
4
24
29
24
18
23
3
5
17
5
7
9
Pre-Adsil
EER
10.19
11.76
11.88
11.30
9.45
7.61
9.06
9.70
9.20
9.70
11.87
10.58
10.58
7.91
10.71
9.07
10.52
8.11
7.09
9.62
9.99
7.65
11.63
9.18
9.84
7.03
8.53
7.89
10.14
10.44
Post Adsil
EER
10.78
12.48
12.48
12.13
9.97
7.69
8.34
10.17
9.79
9.89
12.51
11.03
11.14
9.12
11.87
11.63
10.92
8.57
9.55
9.72
9.89
10.56
12.41
10.36
10.78
8.22
9.45
8.40
12.15
11.40
%
Change
5.8%
6.1%
5.1%
7.3%
5.6%
1.1%
-7.9%
4.9%
6.4%
2.0%
5.4%
4.2%
5.3%
15.3%
10.9%
28.2%
3.8%
5.6%
34.7%
1 .0%
-1 .0%
38.0%
6.7%
12.8%
9.5%
16.9%
10.7%
6.6%
19.8%
9.2%
Ton
weighted
avg.
54.1%
32.0%
26.4%
40.0%
31 .7%
2.5%
-21 .8%
14.5%
33.1%
5.8%
16.1%
31 .5%
39.4%
182.2%
83.0%
584.8%
28.3%
29.3%
138.7%
24.0%
-27.9%
922.9%
122.7%
291.2%
27.1%
81 .4%
185.2%
34.1%
146.4%
84.4%
Condensing
Tons
tested
9.31
5.23
5.23
5.48
5.71
2.35
2.75
2.97
5.19
2.97
3.00
7.49
7.49
11.88
7.63
20.71
7.44
5.21
4.00
23.98
28.74
24.30
18.41
22.67
2.84
4.82
17.29
5.19
7.40
9.19
Pre-Adsil
EER
47.97
NA
NA
14.79
15.61
18.70
NA
19.79
17.58
22.41
NA
17.50
16.44
18.84
19.25
15.57
26.63
22.06
NA
21.13
NA
NA
19.76
13.15
15.47
NA
7.42
NA
NA
10.91
Post Adsil
EER
56.62
NA
NA
27.07
27.88
19.83
NA
32.96
21.62
20.42
NA
22.68
24.28
17.47
22.05
23.30
23.52
21.93
NA
16.08
NA
NA
17.04
24.74
25.34
NA
15.81
NA
NA
14.82
%
Change
18.0%
NA
NA
83.0%
78.6%
6.1%
NA
66.6%
23.0%
-8.9%
NA
29.6%
47.6%
-7.3%
14.5%
49.7%
-1 1 .6%
-0.6%
NA
-23.9%
NA
NA
-13.7%
88.1%
63.8%
NA
113.2%
NA
NA
35.9%
Ton
weighted
avg.
167.9%
NA
NA
455.2%
448.9%
14.3%
NA
197.5%
119.1%
-26.3%
NA
9.3%
18.8%
-13.2%
12.1%
290.4%
-3.3%
-0.2%
NA
-573.3%
NA
NA
-253.1%
1997.4%
181.2%
NA
1956.7%
NA
NA
329.4%
Spreadshee
Pre-Adsil
EER
11.32
11.19
11.14
11.35
9.84
7.05
7.43
8.00
8.51
8.06
11.65
10.74
10.74
9.39
10.70
9.98
10.19
9.25
8.04
8.85
7.96
8.08
7.81
9.21
8.93
8.76
8.82
9.10
9.57
9.13
Post Adsil
EER
11.62
11.88
11.88
12.01
10.39
7.49
8.70
8.80
9.06
8.80
11.88
10.81
10.83
10.22
10.77
10.44
10.21
9.26
9.45
8.85
8.89
8.93
8.86
9.53
9.37
9.16
9.32
9.51
10.23
9.60
0.00 (tons not counted)
286.83 9.33%
standard deviation 9.7%
count 30
standard error 1.8%
11.31%
90.65 (tons not counted)
196.18 32.6%
standard deviation 35.1%
count 20
standard error 7.9%
27.2%
standard deviation
count
standard error
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_ Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil PrqjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
5-5
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Table 5-3
Summary of Valid Tests at Literature Temperatures
P re-test
Site Unit Age OAT
Concord Admin RTU-7 6 92
Concord City Hall RTU-2 5 86
RTU-3 5 86
SS-1 2 85
SS-2 5 87
SS-4 11 93
SS-5 7 88
Locust City Hall SS-2 7 94
Monroe Aquatic Center RTU-1 7 94
RTU-2 7 85
RTU-9 7 88
RTU-10 7 85
RTU-13 7 92
YTC Bid D RTU-1 4 88
YTC Truck School SS-1 15 85
Per Unit
Ton-Weighted
Post-test
OAT
93
89
88
88
92
89
87
89
91
88
87
89
93
85
86
Service Assistant
Tons
tested
9
5
5
5
6
2
3
3
7
7
12
8
21
4
9
Pre-Adsil
EER
10.19
11.76
11.88
11.30
9.45
7.61
9.06
11.87
10.58
10.58
7.91
10.71
9.07
7.09
10.44
Post Adsil
EER
10.78
12.48
12.48
12.13
9.97
7.69
8.34
12.51
11.03
11.14
9.12
11.87
11.63
9.55
11.40
%
Change
5.8%
6.1%
5.1%
7.3%
5.6%
1.1%
-7.9%
5.4%
4.2%
5.3%
15.3%
10.9%
28.2%
34.7%
9.2%
Ton
weighted
avg.
54.1%
32.0%
26.4%
40.0%
31 .7%
2.5%
-21 .8%
16.1%
31 .5%
39.4%
182.2%
83.0%
584.8%
138.7%
84.4%
Condensing
Tons
tested
9.31
5.23
5.23
5.48
5.71
2.35
2.75
3.00
7.49
7.49
11.88
7.63
20.71
4.00
9.19
Pre-Adsil
EER
47.97
NA
NA
14.79
15.61
18.70
NA
NA
17.50
16.44
18.84
19.25
15.57
NA
10.91
Post Adsil
EER
56.62
NA
NA
27.07
27.88
19.83
NA
NA
22.68
24.28
17.47
22.05
23.30
NA
14.82
%
Change
18.0%
NA
NA
83.0%
78.6%
6.1%
NA
NA
29.6%
47.6%
-7.3%
14.5%
49.7%
NA
35.9%
Ton
weighted
avg.
167.9%
NA
NA
455.2%
448.9%
14.3%
NA
NA
9.3%
18.8%
-13.2%
12.1%
290.4%
NA
329.4%
Spreadshee
Pre-Adsil
EER
11.32
11.19
11.14
11.35
9.84
7.05
7.43
11.65
10.74
10.74
9.39
10.70
9.98
8.04
9.13
Post Adsil
EER
11.62
11.88
11.88
12.01
10.39
7.49
8.70
11.88
10.81
10.83
10.22
10.77
10.44
9.45
9.60
0.00 (tons not counted)
107.44 9.07%
standard deviation 10.1%
count 15
standard error 2.6%
12.33%
20.20 (tons not counted)
87.24 35.6%
standard deviation 28.5%
count 10
standard error 9.0%
19.9%
standard deviation
count
standard error
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_ Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil PrqjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
5-6
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
The increase in EER varied from a low of 9.9% in the Service Assistant test for all units to a high
of 30% using the condenser test methodology on the same sample. It is MACTEC's opinion that
the test results from the Service Assistant tests conducted within the range of manufacturer's
published EER values provide the most reliable prediction of energy savings. The increase in
efficiency of the units in this study is therefore estimated to be 12.3%. Complete results are
provided in Appendix F. Figure 5-1 graphically depicts the change in EER based on the Service
Assistant measurements on this sample.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
5-7 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
Figure 5-1
Service Assistant, Valid Tests at Literature Temperatures
RTU-7 RTU-2
Source: MACTEC,2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
5-S
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
6. Projected Energy Savings
A total of 150 units in the SEQL area were cleaned and coated with Adsil representing a total of
2,545 tons of HVAC equipment. Based on MACTEC's measurement of the change in EER, an
improvement in efficiency of 12.3% is expected in this population. Appendix G contains the
calculation details and assumptions but for convenience the key elements are repeated. The
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) lists the cooling degree days (CDD)
for the Charlotte area at 1,648. This number represents the amount of time that the temperatures
are above 65 degrees with each degree above 65 being weighted heavier than the one before.
Twenty-four hours of a 66-degree temperature represent one CDD; conversely, one hour of 89
degree temperature also represents one CDD. The American Society of Heating, Refrigeration,
and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) suggests that the number of Full Load Equivalent
Operating Hours (FLEOH) of apiece of equipment is roughly equal to 80% of the CDDs.
Using these inputs and others detailed in Appendix G, MACETC estimates that the application of
Adsil to this population will result in an annual energy savings of 461,400 kilowatt-hours (kWh)
and an annual cost savings in excess of $37,000. These energy savings result in lowered
production from power plants and should, consequently, result in decreased emissions. However,
because of the complexities of the power transfers over the power grid, it is difficult to verify or
quantify pollution benefits and to do so is beyond the scope of this project.
A tool for projecting energy savings at an individual facility or group of facilities is provided in
Figure 6-1. Required inputs are highlighted in yellow. Providing data to these fields will
automatically estimate annual energy and cost savings for a facility or facility group.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
6-1 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
FIGURE 6-1 ENERGY SAVINGS PROJECTION TOOL
Facility: Your Facility Name
Capacity of HVAC Units
ECP Savings: 371.67 Electric Demand kW
$36,915 Electric Energy Cost Savings
Total ECP Savings: $36,915 Total Annual Cost Savings
ECP Cost: $165,425
Payback: 4.48 yrs (excluding maint savings)
461,440 Electric Energy kWh
1,574 Electric Energy MMBtu
1,574 Total Annual MMBtu Savings
Calculations
Assumptions: This recommendation is applied in the following instances:
1) New equipment
2) Existing equipment with evidence of minor environmental damage
3) Equipment with five years of useful life remaining
The protective corrosion inhibitor is MicroGuard (TM) product from Adsil (TM)
Charlotte area has 1644 cooling degree days (CDD) per NOAA
Full-load equivalent operating hours = FLEOH= 0.8*CDD
Decrease in EER is assumed to be both an increase in power consumption
and capacity degradation
Savings to heat pumps during the heating season are not included
Average EER=9.0
Average EER gain =12.3%
Nominal capacity is total tonnage at facility. Available from equipment nameplate data.
May be estimated by taking total facility square footage and dividing by 400.
CDD from website http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd/nrmcdd.html
1644
1,315
$0.000
$0.08000
0.003412
12.3%
CDD use website to get CDD for your city
FLEOH
Demand Cost per kW
Energy Cost per kWh
MMBtu/kWh
EER gain use default of 12.3% or value from degradation tool
use blended electric rate
HVAC System Data
Condensing Unit Data from:
Condensing Unit Consumption:
Calculated EER:
EER after coil application
kW/ton after coil application
Demand Consumption
SEQL Area
3393.33 kW
10.1 Btu/W-hr
10.11
1.19
3021.67
Nominal Capacity:
Present Condition EER:
kW/ton=
2545.0 tons
9.0 Btu/W-hr
1.33
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by :_TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportXEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
6-2
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
FIGURE 6-1 ENERGY SAVINGS PROJECTION TOOL (continued)
Facility: Your Facility Name
Capacity of HVAC Units
Current Run-time Adjustment Factors
Night Setback: 1.000 Note 1
FLEOH Conversion: 0.800
Proposed Run-time Adjustment Factors
Night Setback: 1.000
FLEOH Conversion: 0.800
Excess Capacity:
Weekend Setback:
Cooling Set Point:
Excess Capacity:
Weekend Setback:
Cooling Set Point:
Run-time Estimates
Current condensing unit:
Proposed condensing unit:
1,242 hours - annually
1,242 hours - annually
kW
Current 3393.333
Proposed 3021.668
Savings
kWh
4,212,989
3,751,548
461,440
Installation Costs
Nominal capacity:
Cost associated to install coating (parts & labor):
Total project cost:
1.000
1.000 Note 2
72.00 Degrees F
1.000
1.000
72.00 Degrees F
2,545 tons
$65 per ton (total installed cost)
(vendor quotation)
$165,425
Note 1: Use a night setback value of .95 if HAVC equipment does not run at night after 6:00 P.M. Use 1 if no
setback is used.
Note 2: Use a weekend setback value of .75 is HVAC is turned off for the weekend. Use .875 if it is turned off
for one day during the weekend.
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
6-3
MACTEC
-------
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
7. Estimated Degradation in HVAC Performance
The estimation of air conditioning condensing unit performance degradation was based on a
combination of objective input factors. The development of degradation prediction equations was
based on empirical data we collected from testing in this program. MACTEC has previously
found that degradation of HVAC equipment is influenced by many factors, including compressor
wear, evaporator coil fouling and deterioration (resulting primarily in increased equipment run
time and decreased capacity) and condenser coil degradation (resulting in a decrease in efficiency
and an increase in power consumption). It is inherently difficult to predict equipment degradation
over time. This is due in part to the difficulty in conducting a statistically significant study that
controls or measures the large number of variables involved (compressor type, age and condition;
condenser coil coating and condition; evaporator coil condition; indoor temperature and humidity
conditions; under/overcharge of refrigerant; ambient weather conditions; and quality of
equipment installation to name a few).
To begin the process, nameplate data for each of 45 units being tested was field-collected and the
efficiency of the unit when new was determined from manufacturer's literature at a range of
ambient conditions. MACTEC then measured the efficiency of each HVAC unit and determined
the degradation in EER, compared with published data at the same conditions (ambient
temperature and entering wet-bulb temperature) when new.
A spreadsheet was developed which weighted various condenser conditions, including age, coil
cleanliness, fin condition, fin-tube attachment, and corrosion. These categories are objectively
graded by algorithms contained in this degradation prediction tool, shown in Figure 7-1. The
results of the spreadsheet EER degradation prediction model was compared with the results of the
Service Assistant measurements for the two sample groups: Valid Test Results, and Valid Test
Results at Literature Temperatures.
The spreadsheet model predicted an EER degradation of 11.49% compared with a Service
Assistant degradation of 11.50% (ton-weighted average) and 10.31% (unit average). These
results are presented in Appendix H. A second comparison was made with the results compiled
from the summary tests of the population of units contained in the tests performed within the
realm of literature published temperatures. In this case, the spreadsheet model predicted an EER
degradation of 10.45%. The Service Assistant measurements resulted in an EER degradation of
13.14% (ton-weighted average) and 11.00% (unit average). These results are also presented in
Appendix H.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
7-1 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
FIGURE 7-1 Degradation Prediction Tool
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Brand X
Big Guy 60
123456
Split-System
1999
ACME Warehouse
SS-2
18.0 Amps
208 Volts
0.80
1.40 Amps
208 Volts
0.70
Published EER: 10.2
Calculated EER: 10.8
Nominal Capacity: 5.00
Age 5
Coil Conditon 12%
Present Condition E 9.6
kW/ton 1.25
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Power supply: 3-phase
Phase adjustment: 1.73
Compressor quantity: 1
Power supply: 3-phase
Phase adjustment: 1.73
Fan quantity: 1
(=1.0 if single phase)
(=1.0 if single phase)
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: NA Amps
Nameplate Voltage: NA Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
1 or 3-phase
1 or 1.73
NA
5.2 kW
0.35 kW
#VALUE! kW
5.53 kW - Condensing side only
Condenser Coil Assessment
Age of Unit
New
2-9 years
10-14 years
15 or more
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
0.7
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.9
12.3% Performance Degradation
Put a "1" in the approf
correspond with the ai
Put a "1" if unit is currently coated
Place a percentage (.01-1) to represent
percentage of the fins that are considered
to be clean, dirty, clogged, or plugged. These
must sum to 100%
Percentage in "like new" condition
Percentage "bent"
Percentage "smashed"
Percentage "dull/rough, corroded, pitted,
& flaking" plus percentage "like new",
must equal 100%.
Place a"1" in the appropriate cell
Place a"1" in the appropriate cell
Source: MACTEC, 2004.
Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
7-2
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
The impact of various factors on the degradation of the unit are included in Appendix H. It is of
interest to note that the age of the unit had little impact on the degradation of the coil (see
Figure 7-2). Figure 7-3 graphically depicts the comparison of spreadsheet predicted EER
degradation with actual measured degradation. This must be differentiated from the degradation
of the unit as a whole because the scope of this project was confined to the recoverable portion of
the EER due to Adsil treatment and did not address other contributing factors (compressor wear,
evaporator degradation, refrigerant charge, etc.) which would not be impacted by condenser coil
restoration. The fin condition and the dirt factor were observed to have the greatest impact on the
decrease in performance, as shown in Figure 7-4 and Figure 7-5. Corrosion was observed to have
a negative impact on the degradation of these units (see Figure 7-6); however, this may be
misleading due to the almost complete lack of corrosion present in this population. Because the
corrosion was minimal, other contributing factors controlled the degradation resulting in an
apparent increase in EER when compared with corrosion factor as a stand-alone attribute. In
aggressive environments or corroded coil units, this attribute would be expected to contribute to
the decrease in performance. A comparison was also done to compare the EER Degradation vs
capacity. Figure 7-7 shows that the larger units had greater degradation. This has a measurable
impact on the comparison of the unit average degradation as compared with the weighted-average
degradation. Further discussion on this issue will be presented in Section 8.
There is a large variance in the data which is shown by low correlation coefficients for each of
these comparisons. This may result in a potentially large error when a single HVAC unit is
evaluated using this spreadsheet. However, this error should be normalized when used in larger
populations resulting in a more accurate prediction of population EER degradation. This position
is supported by the close correlation in EER population degradations (Spreadsheet vs Service
Assistant methodologies) as discussed earlier.
The accuracy of this tool has not been tested in significantly different climactic areas and there
may be additional attributes which need to be considered in these cases.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
7-3 MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
ro
T3
ro
D)
tu
T3
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Figure 7-2 Degradation of Units Compared with Age
Weighted Average, Literature Valid Tests
10
12
14
16
Age of Unit
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
Figure 7-3
Visual vs Service Assistant Degradation, Literature Valid Tests
RTU-7 RTU-2 RTU-3
Concord Concord City
Admin Hall
SS-2
Locust City
Hall
RTU-1
Monroe
Aquatic
Center
Unit
RTU-10 RTU-13 RTU-1 SS-1
YTC Bid D YTC Truck
School
Average
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
7-4
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
g
(D
05
'E
Z>
Figure 7-4 Degradation of Unit vs Fin Condition
Weighted Average, All Literature Valid Tests
0.35 -i
0.3 -
0.25 -
0.2 -
0.15 J
0.1 -
0.05 -
o -
» Fin Condition Factor vs
Degradation
^^^
^^^^
^^^^
^^^^
.^^^^
^
^~^^ +
' * •
1
•
iii
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Fin Structural Condition Factor
1.2
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
adation
0)
Figure 7-5 Degradation of Unit vs Dirt Factor
0.35 -i
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1 -
0.05 ;
0
C
Weighted Average, Literature Valid Tests
„
* Degrad
I
^^^^^
^ — r
^ » I
^^^^^
K »** •» I
• I
) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Dirt Factor
Factor vs
ation
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_ Checked by: _CDM_
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
7-5
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
0.35 T
Figure 7-6 Degradation of Unit vs Corrosion
Weighted Average, Literature Valid Tests
0.2
0.4
0.6
Corrosion Factor
0.8
1.2
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
0.35 1
0.3
0.25
io
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
Figure 7-7 Degradation of Unit vs Capacity
Weighted Average, All Literature Valid Tests
10
15 20
Capacity of Unit
25
30
35
Source: MACTEC, 2004. Prepared by: _TBL_
Checked by: CDM
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil ProjectVFinal ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.di
7-6
MACTEC
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
8. Statistical Significance
The results of the SEQL area testing were evaluated to determine the statistical significance of the
study. This statistical testing was based on individual unit results; however, the EER
improvements realized for the ton-weighted average were greater than for the unit average. A
clearly defensible statistical method for evaluating units on a ton-weighted average was not easily
discerned so it was decided to measure the significance based on a unit average and apply the
results to the ton-weighted average approach.
For each unit with both pre- and post-Adsil treatment EER results, the % difference in efficiency
{100 x (EER, post-treatment - EER, pre-treatment)/EER, pre-treatment} was tabulated. Thus a
positive change indicates an efficiency improvement. This data set (% Change in EER) was tested
to determine if it exhibited a normal distribution. Statistical tests were performed in SYSTAT 10
(SPSS, Inc. 2000), and the test for normality was Lilliefors and the level of significance selected
was 0.05 (indicating 95% confidence that the data were drawn from a normal population). If the
data passed the test of normality, then the 't' test was used to determine whether the average
improvement was significantly greater than zero. This procedure is equivalent to performing a
paired 't' test on the two (pre- and post-) data sets. The significance was evaluated at a level of
0.05. In fact all data sets exhibited significant improvement with significance less than 0.01,
indicating 99% confidence that Adsil treatment resulted in an improvement in efficiency.
If the % Change in EER data sets did not follow a normal distribution, then the nonparametric
equivalent of a paired 't' test, the Wilcoxon signed rank test, was used to determine the effect of
Adsil treatment.
All data sets showed an improvement in EER post-Adsil treatment, when compared with
pre-treatment EER. The model results are presented in Appendix I.
The relationship between EER improvement and unit capacity (tons) was demonstrated in
Section 7 and shown in Figure 7-7; therefore ton-weighted averages are expected to exhibit
similar improvement as the results obtained from individual unit comparisons, and ton-weighted
improvements are also expected to be statistically significant.
After determining that each data set exhibited significant improvement, the average and standard
error for each data set was determined, as well as the upper and lower confidence intervals of the
average improvement. These results indicate typical improvements that may be expected in
various populations, as well as the range in potential improvements.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
8-1 MACTEC
-------
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
9. Summary of Results and Conclusions
MACTEC evaluated the impact ofAdsil application to 45 HVAC units in the SEQL area and to
three units outside the SEQL area. The results of this evaluation show that the Adsil treatment
can be expected to improve the efficiency of existing HVAC units by approximately 12% based
on the ton-weighted average method used in this project. The data was statistically evaluated and
determined to be significant at the 99% confidence level.
Utility bill analysis was determined to be an inappropriate measurement tool for EER changes
and therefore actual efficiency measurements for each HVAC unit were performed. Three tests
were used including a calculation method, a power and capacity measurement, and a refrigerant-
based measurement using the Service Assistant as available from Honeywell Controls.
Two baseline studies were conducted to establish the accuracy of each testing protocol and which
involved repeated tests on two units. Repeatability in measurements was demonstrated in these
tests and it was determined that the Service Assistant instrument provided the most repeatable and
accurate measurements of HVAC EER. The generic compressor curve used for many of the
SEQL area tests was found to underestimate the actual savings demonstrated in the pilot baseline
study tests. The condenser test methodology was generally less accurate but showed greater
increases in EER as a result of the Adsil treatment.
A degradation prediction tool for HVAC units was created in this pilot program. This
spreadsheet-based tool was calibrated against actual EER measurements and was found to be very
accurate in predicting the EER degradation of a population of HVAC units in the SEQL area.
An energy savings projection tool was also created based on the results of this study. This tool
can be easily adapted by facility owners and operators to estimate their energy savings, dollar
savings, and possibly avoided pollution emissions as a result of the application ofAdsil to air-
cooled HVAC equipment. This tool estimates that annual dollar savings for the 150 units coated
in the SEQL area will exceed $37,000 based on a blended electric rate of $0.08 per kWh.
MACTEC believes that this product demonstrated significant savings for air-cooled HVAC
equipment.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
9-1 MACTEC
-------
-------
Application ofAdsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
10. Recommendations
MACTEC recommends that the units in this study be evaluated for EER improvements on an
annual basis. The instantaneous results form the Adsil treatment indicated that the EER improved
12%. There is no data currently available to support or refute that these improvements will be
maintained. It would be very valuable to conclusively identify the long-term impact of the
product on HVAC efficiency.
P:\EEG\Energy\EPA Adsil Project\Final ReportVEPA Adsil Final Report with edits - v2.doc
10-1 MACTEC
-------
-------
Appendix A
Preliminary Application List
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
Table A-1
Preliminary Application List
Building Tons
1 City of Concord Admin Building 83
2 City of Concord - City Hall 58.5
3 City of Monroe Rec Center 6
4 City of Monroe Arts Building 9
5 City of Monroe Recreation Buildings 183
6 Town of Stallings Govt Office 9.5
7 City of Salisbury - Rec Building 33
8 Rowan County Office Building 80
9 County of Anson Building "C" 20
10 Town of Granite Quarry Town Hall 15
11 Iredell County - Health Building 169
12 Char/ Meek Samuel Billings Center 125
13 Char/Meek Wallace Kuralt Center 550
14 Gaston County Mental Health Home 8
15 Town of Badin -Town Hall 9
16 City of Locust Town Hall & Rec Bldg 12
17 YTC Building "C" 80
18 YTC-Building "B" 120
19 YTC Building "D" 42.5
20 YTC-Building "F" 11
21 YTC - Maintenance Building 7
22 YTC Student Services 84
23 YTC Truck Driving School 7.5
24 YTC - Student Center 39
25 YTC - Library 80
26 YTC Building "A" 155
27 YTC - Science Building 270
28 YTC Hood Center 310.5
Totals 2576.5
-------
-------
Appendix B
Residential Split System Tests
-------
HVAC Datasheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
30.8 Amps
208 Volts
0.96
1.40 Amps
208 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.10 Amps
Nameplate Voltage: 122 Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.77
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
9.4
9.4
4.96
13
18%
7.4
1.62
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1
Calculated compressor load: 6.1
Calculated condensing fan load: 0.20
Calculated evaporator fan load 0.67
Total calculated load for equipment: 6.32
Assumptions
Present condition EER based on degradation of 2% per year after year 4
plus additional degradation of condenser coil
kW Published Total; System kW
kW Condensing Unit kWat ARI conditons
kW Capacity at ARI Conditions=
kW- Condensing side only
6.32
4.96
Condenser Coil Assessmei
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
18.2% Performance Degradation
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Ass
nput SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Listed Fan CFM
244
20.8 4.6 0.92
slant Measurement
10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
F
F
%
%
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
67 F 293 K
89 F 305 K
73.5 in
28 in
15.0sq-ft
1115
Air Mass Flow 0.63 kg/sec |
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
2.21 Tons
5.76 EER
2.08 kWfTon
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Appendix B
Page 1 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Blower Data April 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Average
2.7
3.5
3.3
3.9
3.7
3.5
3.5
3.1
3.3
3.1
3.7
3.5
3.5
2.7
2.9
2.9
2.5
2.5
3.1
3.9
4.1
3.281
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Average
Area=
CFM=
3.1
2.9
2.1
2.7
2.5
2.5
3.5
3.7
3.3
2.922
1
175.3333
Total Blower CFM=
Published=
Error=
ft/sec
sq ft
1061.19
2000
47%
Area= 4.5 sq ft
CFM= 885.8571
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Average
Area=
CFM=
4.1
4.1
4.1
3.9
3.7
2.9
3.7
3.9
4.3
4.3
3.9
3.9
4.3
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.3
4.7
4.9
5.3
4.129
Blower Data April 10
Total Blower CFM- 11 33.293
Published= 2000
Error= 43%
ft/sec
4.575 sq ft
1133.293
Appendix B
Page 2 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 90 Degrees
MayS, 2004 3:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
241
23.8
5.4
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
12
5
63
45
236
97
92
36
9
15
112
20
77
49
33%
85%
90%
90%
5
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
12
5
63
45
236
97
92
36
9
15
112
20
77
49
33%
85%
84%
78%
4.7
;ti mates
95 F 308
115 F 319
in
in
15.0sq-ft
4365
2.47 kg/sec
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
7.86 Tons
17.46 EER
0.69 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
5.9
5.3
5.1
4.7
4.1
4.1
5.3
4.3
4.1
4.1
4.7
4.1
4.6
6.6
6.2
5.7
4.3
4.1
4.850
Appendix B
Page 3 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 92 Degrees
MayS, 2004 2:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
241
23.8
5.4
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
63
45
236
97
92
36
9
15
112
20
77
49
33%
85%
90%
90%
5
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
;timates
95 F
115 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
4365
2.47 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
63
45
231
97
92
36
9
14
112
19
77
49
33
85
84%
78%
4.7
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
308 K
319 K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
7.86 Tons
17.46 EER
0.69 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
5.9
5.3
5.1
4.7
4.1
4.1
5.3
4.3
4.1
4.1
4.7
4.1
4.6
6.6
6.2
5.7
4.3
4.1
4.850
Appendix B
Page 4 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 90 Degrees
July 8 2004 1:45 PM
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
240
24.4
5.6
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
12
5
66
46
231
97
90
38
7
16
112
21
79
50
29%
85%
90%
92%
4.8
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
12
5
66
46
231
97
90
38
7
16
112
21
79
50
29%
85%
85%
81%
4.8
;ti mates
90 F 305
116F 320
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3920
2.22 kg/sec
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
9.17 Tons
19.65 EER
0.61 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
5.1
5.3
5.5
4.7
3.7
3.1
5.5
4.7
3.7
4.1
4.3
4.1
3.5
4.7
4.3
4.3
3.7
4.1
4.356
Appendix B
Page 5 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 90 Degrees
MayS, 2004 3:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
241
23.8
5.4
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
61
43
227
96
90
35
8
16
112
21
88
49
33%
85%
88%
88%
5
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
90 F
111 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
4065
2.30 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
62
43
234
97
91
36
7
16
112
21
88
49
33%
85%
83%
77%
4.7
305
317
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
7.68 Tons
17.07 EER
0.70 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
5.7
4.7
4.3
4.5
3.7
3.9
4.3
4.1
4.1
3.7
3.5
3.7
5.1
6.4
6.1
5.7
4.3
3.5
4.517
Appendix B
Page 6 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 88 Degrees
MayS, 2004 6:30 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
243
21.5
5.4
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
62
45
220
92
88
35
9
16
108
20
80
48
25%
85%
89%
88%
5
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
;timates
86 F
108 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3870
2.19 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
61
42
220
93
88
35
7
15
108
20
80
48
25%
85%
83%
77%
4.7
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
303 K
315 K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
7.66 Tons
17.03 EER
0.70 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
5.7
4.3
4.5
4.1
3.3
3.7
4.1
3.1
3.9
3.7
3.5
3.5
4.9
6.1
6.1
4.9
4.3
3.7
4.300
Appendix B
Page 7 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 85 Degrees
July 8 2004 2:40 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
241
23.4
5.3
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
62
41
214
91
85
35
6
16
107
22
76
48
26%
85%
86%
88%
4.9
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
86 F
109 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3600
2.04 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
62
41
214
91
85
35
6
16
107
22
76
48
0.26
0.85
83%
78%
4.8
303
316
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
7.45 Tons
16.87 EER
0.71 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
3.3
2.7
3.9
3.3
2.7
2.5
4.3
4.3
3.7
4.9
4.1
3.5
5.3
5.9
5.5
5.1
3.5
3.5
4.000
Appendix B
Page 8 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 85 Degrees
April 9, 2004 4:45 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
241
23.1
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
75
46
30
87
81%
72%
5.5
;ti mates
85 F 303
108 F 315
in
in
15.0sq-ft
1870
1.06 kg/sec
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
3.87 Tons
8.93 EER
1.34 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.7
2.7
4.7
4.9
3.1
0
4.5
3.5
2.5
2
1.8
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2.078
Not Updated
Appendix B
Page 9 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 85 Degrees
April 28, 2004 3:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
243
23.1
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
12
5
60
51
212
91
85
34
17
13
104
20
77
48
33%
85%
88%
84%
4.9
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
12
5
60
49
213
91
85
34
15
14
105
21
77
48
33
85
83%
76%
4.7
;ti mates
85 F 303
108 F 315
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3200
1.81 kg/sec
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
6.62 Tons
15.29 EER
0.79 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.5
3.9
2.7
4.1
4.9
3.1
3.9
3.3
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.7
3.9
4.5
2.9
5.3
3.5
2.1
3.556
Appendix B
Page 10 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 84 Degrees
June 2, 2004 at 10:25 AW
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
243
22.6
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
10
5
59
46
206
89
84
33
12
15
103
19
78
47
25%
85%
87%
84%
6.3
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
;timates
84 F
106 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
1915
1 .08 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
10
5
59
46
206
89
84
33
12
15
103
19
78
47
25%
85%
86%
78%
5.5
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
302 K
314 K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
3.79 Tons
8.75 EER
1.37 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
3.5
2.7
0
2
0
0
3.1
5.5
4.5
2.9
1.8
0
2.7
2.7
1.4
3.5
2
0
2.128
Appendix B
Page 11 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 84 Degrees
April 28, 2004 4:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
243
22.8
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
58
44
204
91
84
32
13
12
102
19
76
45
24%
85%
84%
80%
4.8
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
84 F
107 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3195
1.81 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
58
44
207
91
84
32
12
13
104
20
77
45
24
85
81%
73%
4.6
302
315
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
6.61 Tons
15.26 EER
0.79 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.5
3.9
3.1
4.1
3.9
3.1
3.7
3.3
2.7
1.8
1.8
2
4.9
5.3
3.3
5.7
4.5
2.3
3.550
Appendix B
Page 12 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 83 Degrees
July 8 2004 10:55 A.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
243
23
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
12
5
59
40
208
91
83
34
6
13
104
21
72
48
27%
85%
84%
82%
5.1
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
12
5
59
40
208
91
83
34
6
13
104
21
72
48
27%
85%
80%
73%
4.7
;ti mates
85 F 303
106 F 314
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3705
2.10 kg/sec
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
7.00 Tons
16.16 EER
0.74 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
2.3
4
4.7
3.9
3.7
3.5
5.1
4.7
4.7
4.3
2.7
2.9
4.7
6.1
5.5
4.9
3.5
2.9
4.117
Appendix B
Page 13 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 84 Degrees
April 10, 2004 5:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
243
23.3
5.3
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
60
49
214
90
84
34
15
16
106
21
75
46
30%
87%
86%
84%
5.2
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
;timates
84 F
107 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
1870
1 .06 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
60
50
209
90
84
34
16
16
105
22
75
46
30
87
83%
76%
4.7
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
302 K
315 K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
3.87 Tons
8.76 EER
1.37 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.7
2.7
4.7
4.9
3.1
0
4.5
3.5
2.5
2
1.8
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2.078
Appendix B
Page 14 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 83 Degrees
April 28, 2004 5:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
243
22.6
5.1
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
57
43
201
90
83
31
12
11
102
18
74
44
25%
85%
85%
80%
4.7
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
83 F
105 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
2515
1 .42 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
56
43
201
89
83
31
12
12
102
20
74
44
25
85
80%
72%
4.6
301
314
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
4.98 Tons
11.72 EER
1.02 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.1
3.5
2.5
3.1
2.9
2
2.5
2.3
2.1
1.8
2
0
4.9
5.1
2.1
5.3
4.1
0
2.794
Appendix B
Page 15 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 83 Degrees
July 8 2004 9:55 A.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
242
23.1
5.3
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
12
5
60
40
207
89
82
34
6
15
104
21
75
49
34%
85%
84%
83%
4.7
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
12
5
60
40
207
89
82
34
6
15
104
21
75
49
34%
85%
81%
75%
4.7
;ti mates
85 F 303
107 F 315
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3815
2.16 kg/sec
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
7.55 Tons
17.10 EER
0.70 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
3.1
3.7
3.3
3.9
3.7
3.7
5.5
5.1
4.7
4.7
3.3
3.5
3.9
6.2
5.7
5.3
3.3
3.7
4.239
Appendix B
Page 16 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 73 Degrees
April 8, 2004 5:00 P.M. Generic Compressor Curve
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
244
21.5
4.8
0.92
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
10
5
NA
NA
NA
NA
79%
73%
5.5
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
10
5
NA
NA
NA
NA
79
73
5.5
;ti mates
73 F
95 F
NA in
NA in
15.0sq-ft
1870
1.06 kg/sec
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
3.70 Tons
9.26 EER
1.30 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.7
2.7
4.7
4.9
3.1
0
4.5
3.5
2.5
2
1.8
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2.078
Appendix B
Page 17 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 71 Degrees
April 12, 2004 7:30 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
244
21.5
4.8
0.92
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
12
5
58
69
177
74
71
32
37
19
93
23
75
46
30
87
87%
82%
6.6
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
12
5
56
69
176
73
71
31
38
19
93
22
75
46
30
87
79%
71%
4.6
;ti mates
71 F
96 F
NA in
NA in
15.0sq-ft
1870
1.06 kg/sec
Low
High
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
4.21 Tons
10.52 EER
1.14 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.7
2.7
4.7
4.9
3.1
0
4.5
3.5
2.5
2
1.8
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2.078
Fan Not Measured-Used previous numbers
Appendix B
Page 18 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 66 Degrees
April 14, 2004 6:30 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
244
20.6
4.6
0.92
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
67
64
157
69
66
39
24
17
85
19
72
41
35
85
102%
102%
4.9
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
69
64
155
68
66
40
22
17
85
19
72
41
35
85
1 03%
1 03%
5
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
;timates
66 F
88 F
NA in
NA in
15.0sq-ft
3110
1 .76 kg/sec
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
6.16 Tons
16.06 EER
0.75 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
2.1
5.5
3.7
6.1
5.3
2.1
4.5
3.5
2.9
3.1
3.5
2.7
3.1
3.7
3.5
2.5
2.1
2.3
3.456
Appendix B
Page 19 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 64 Degrees
April 12, 2004 8:00 A.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
246
21.2
4.8
0.91
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
53
64
162
68
64
28
36
19
87
24
75
46
30
87
80%
73%
5.7
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
52
64
160
69
64
28
37
18
87
22
75
46
30
87
79%
72%
4.6
Low
High
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
;timates
66 F
89 F
NA in
NA in
15.0sq-ft
1870
1 .06 kg/sec
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
3.87 Tons
9.68 EER
1.24 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
4.7
2.7
4.7
4.9
3.1
0
4.5
3.5
2.5
2
1.8
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2.078
Fan Not Measured-Used previous numbers
Appendix B
Page 20 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 84 Degrees
Juto 2004 3:45 PM- Cleaned Coil with Hose
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
243
22.9
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
60
39
205
86
84
34
5
17
103
19
75
48
26%
85%
87%
86%
5.1
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
82 F
106 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
3715
2.10 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
60
39
205
86
84
34
5
17
103
19
75
48
0.26
0.85
84%
77%
4.7
301
314
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
8.02 Tons
18.52 EER
0.65 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
3.9
4.7
5.5
4.1
2.7
2.7
4.5
3.9
3.3
3.5
4.1
3.9
6.2
5.5
4.3
3.9
3.9
3.7
4.128
Appendix B
Page 21 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
TABLE 4-1
Unit 1 Baseline Study
Generic Compressor Test Summary-All Temperatures
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unitCFM
Capacity at ARI
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
9.4 BTU/W-h
3000 CFM (Listed)
4.96 tons
15 sq-ft
7.40
Test Date
April 12-G
April 14-G
April 12G
April 8G
July 8-G
April 28G
July 8-G
April 10G
April 28G
June 2-G3
July8G4
April 28G
July 8G
MaySG
MaySG
July 8G
MaySG
POST ADSIL
August 21-G
August 20-G
August 23-G
August 20-G
August 20-G
August 20-G
August 10-G
August 21-G
August 10-G1
August 6-G
August 6-G1
August 1 8-G
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
64
66
71
73
82
83
83
84
84
84
84
85
85
88
90
90
92
EWB
57
56
57
57
58
55
53
57
55
56
55
59
56
58
55
59
59
AVERAGES
OAT
73
81
82
83
85
85
85
86
87
89
91
90
EWB
59
59
63
60
60
65
57
59
58
60
60
65
AVERAGES
El
80%
102%
87%
79%
84%
85%
84%
86%
84%
87%
87%
88%
86%
89%
88%
90%
90%
86.8%
El
86%
87%
95%
88%
88%
88%
88%
88%
94%
93%
99%
94%
90.7%
Cl
73%
102%
82%
73%
83%
80%
82%
84%
80%
84%
86%
84%
88%
88%
88%
92%
90%
84.6%
Cl
81%
85%
95%
87%
85%
85%
85%
87%
90%
95%
97%
96%
89.0%
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
kW
5.7
4.9
6.6
5.5
4.7
4.7
5.1
5.2
4.8
6.3
5.1
4.9
4.9
5.0
5.0
4.8
5.0
kW
4.7
4.9
5.0
4.9
4.9
5.6
5.8
4.9
5.8
6.1
5.9
6.2
Physical Power and Capacity Measurements
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
66
66
71
73
85
83
85
84
84
84
82
85
86
86
90
90
95
inlet
72
79
82
83
84
82
84
85
82
89
89
90
exhaust
89
88
96
95
107
105
106
107
107
106
106
108
109
108
111
116
115
exhaust
96
102
106
107
107
108
107
108
105
114
115
115
Cond Air
DT(K)
12.8
12.2
13.9
12.2
12.2
12.2
11.7
12.8
12.8
12.2
13.3
12.8
12.8
12.2
11.7
14.4
11.1
12.55
DT(K)
13.3
12.8
13.3
13.3
12.8
14.4
12.8
12.8
12.8
13.9
14.4
13.9
13.38
kW
4.8
4.6
4.8
4.8
5.3
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.6
5.4
kW
4.8
5.1
5.3
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.2
5.3
5.2
5.5
5.6
5.6
(kg/sec)
1.06
1.76
1.06
1.06
2.16
1.42
2.10
1.06
1.81
1.08
2.10
1.81
2.04
2.19
2.30
2.22
2.47
1.75
(kg/sec)
2.96
2.94
2.92
2.99
2.92
2.98
3.01
2.98
3.06
2.93
3.02
2.99
2.97
tons
3.9
6.2
4.2
3.7
7.6
5.0
7.0
3.9
6.6
3.8
8.0
6.6
7.5
7.7
7.7
9.2
7.9
tons
11.31
10.74
11.12
11.39
10.66
12.32
11.01
10.88
11.17
11.62
12.49
11.87
EER
9.68
16.06
10.52
9.26
17.10
11.72
16.16
8.76
15.26
8.75
18.52
15.29
16.87
17.03
17.07
19.65
17.46
14.42
EER
28.27
25.28
25.18
26.29
24.14
27.38
25.41
24.63
25.77
25.35
26.77
25.43
25.83
cfm adj
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
cfm adj
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
EER, Adj
3.68
6.10
4.00
3.52
6.50
4.45
6.14
3.33
5.80
3.32
7.04
5.81
6.41
6.47
6.49
7.47
6.63
5.48
EER, Adj
10.74
9.61
9.57
9.99
9.17
10.40
9.66
9.36
9.79
9.63
10.17
9.66
9.81
kg/sec, adj
0.40
0.67
0.40
0.40
0.82
0.54
0.80
0.40
0.69
0.41
0.80
0.69
0.77
0.83
0.87
0.84
0.94
0.66
kg/sec, adj
1.13
1.12
1.11
1.14
1.11
1.13
1.14
1.13
1.16
1.11
1.15
1.14
1.13
Change 4.4%
5.1%
6.6%
70.1%
79.1%
0.0%
79.1%
70.1%
Appendix B
Page 22 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
64G
66G
71G
73G
82G
83G
83G1
84G1
84G2
84G3
84G4
85G
85G
88G
90G
90G1
92G
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
5.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
6.6
#REF!
#REF!
5.5
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
5.1
#REF!
#REF!
5.2
#REF!
#REF!
4.8
#REF!
#REF!
6.3
#REF!
#REF!
5.1
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
4.8
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
CU
4.8
3.87
9.68
4.6
6.16
16.06
4.8
4.21
10.52
4.8
3.70
9.26
5.3
7.55
17.10
5.1
4.98
11.72
5.2
7.00
16.16
5.3
3.87
8.76
5.2
6.61
15.26
5.2
3.79
8.75
5.2
8.02
18.52
5.2
6.62
15.29
5.3
7.45
16.87
5.4
7.66
17.03
5.4
7.68
17.07
5.6
9.17
19.65
5.4
7.66
17.03
Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
119%
#REF!
#REF!
107%
#REF!
#REF!
138%
#REF!
#REF!
115%
#REF!
#REF!
89%
#REF!
#REF!
92%
#REF!
#REF!
98%
#REF!
#REF!
98%
#REF!
#REF!
92%
#REF!
#REF!
121%
#REF!
#REF!
98%
#REF!
#REF!
94%
#REF!
#REF!
92%
#REF!
#REF!
93%
#REF!
#REF!
93%
#REF!
#REF!
86%
#REF!
#REF!
93%
#REF!
#REF!
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Literature
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Predicted/SA
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Predicted/CU
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
bstimatea
Degradation
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
-
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Appendix B
Page 23 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
73-G
81-G
82-G
83-G
85-G
85-G1
85-G2
86-G
87-G
89-G
91-G
90-G Clean
Evap
POSTADSIL
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
5.6
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
6.1
#REF!
#REF!
5.9
#REF!
#REF!
6.2
#REF!
#REF!
4.8
11.31
28.27
5.1
10.74
25.28
5.3
11.12
25.18
5.2
11.39
26.29
5.3
10.66
24.14
5.4
12.32
27.38
5.2
11.01
25.41
5.3
10.88
24.63
5.2
11.17
25.77
5.5
11.62
25.35
5.6
12.49
26.77
5.6
11.87
25.43
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
98%
#REF!
#REF!
96%
#REF!
#REF!
94%
#REF!
#REF!
94%
#REF!
#REF!
92%
#REF!
#REF!
104%
#REF!
#REF!
112%
#REF!
#REF!
92%
#REF!
#REF!
112%
#REF!
#REF!
111%
#REF!
#REF!
105%
#REF!
#REF!
111%
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Appendix B
Page 24 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
TABLE A-2
Generic Compressor Test Summary at Ambient 85 Degrees or Higher
(Maximum of 1 Test per Temperature)
9.4 BTU/W-h
3000 CFM (Listed)
4.96 tons
15 sq-ft
7.40
Test Date
July 8G
May 8G
May 8G
May 8G
POST ADSIL
August 10-G
August 21 -G
August 10-G1
August 6-G
August 6-G1
August 18-G
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
85
88
90
92
EWB
56
58
55
59
AVERAGES
OAT
85
86
87
89
91
90
EWB
57
59
58
60
60
65
AVERAGES
El
86%
89%
88%
90%
88.3%
El
88%
88%
94%
93%
99%
94%
92.7%
Cl
88%
88%
88%
90%
88.5%
Cl
85%
87%
90%
95%
97%
96%
91.7%
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
kW
4.9
5.0
5.0
5.0
kW
5.8
4.9
5.8
6.1
5.9
6.2
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
86
86
90
95
inlet
84
85
82
89
89
90
deg F
exhaust
109
108
111
115
exhaust
107
108
105
114
115
115
Cond Air
DT(K)
12.8
12.2
11.7
11.1
11.94
DT(K)
12.8
12.8
12.8
13.9
14.4
13.9
13.43
kW
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.4
kW
5.2
5.3
5.2
5.5
5.6
5.6
(kg/sec)
2.04
2.19
2.30
2.47
2.25
(kg/sec)
3.01
2.98
3.06
2.93
3.02
2.99
3.00
tons
7.5
7.7
7.7
7.9
tons
11.01
10.88
11.17
11.62
12.49
11.87
EER
16.87
17.03
17.07
17.46
17.11
EER
25.41
24.63
25.77
25.35
26.77
25.43
25.56
cfm adj
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
cfm adj
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
EER, adj
6.41
6.47
6.49
6.63
6.50
EER, adj
9.66
9.36
9.79
9.63
10.17
9.66
9.71
Change 5.0%
3.6%
12.4%
33.1%
49.4%
49.4%
Appendix B
Page 25 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
85G
88G
90G
92G
85-G2
86-G
87-G
89-G
91 -G
90-G Clean
Evap
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
POSTADSIL
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
4.9
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
6.1
#REF!
#REF!
5.9
#REF!
#REF!
6.2
#REF!
#REF!
CU
5.3
7.45
16.87
5.4
7.66
17.03
5.4
7.68
17.07
5.4
7.66
17.03
5.2
11.01
25.41
5.3
10.88
24.63
5.2
11.17
25.77
5.5
11.62
25.35
5.6
12.49
26.77
5.6
11.87
25.43
Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
92%
#REF!
#REF!
93%
#REF!
#REF!
93%
#REF!
#REF!
93%
#REF!
#REF!
112%
#REF!
#REF!
92%
#REF!
#REF!
112%
#REF!
#REF!
111%
#REF!
#REF!
105%
#REF!
#REF!
111%
#REF!
#REF!
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Literature
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Predicted/SA
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Predicted/CU
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Estimated
Degradation
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Appendix B
Page 26 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
TABLE B-1
Copeland Compressor Test Summary-All Temperatures
EERatARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
9.4 BTU/W-h
3000 CFM (Listed)
4.96 tons
15 sq-ft
7.40
Test Date
April 12-C
April 14-C
April 12-C
July 8-C
April 28-C
July 8-C1
April 10-C1
April 28-C2
June 2-C3
July8C4
April 9-C1
April 28-C2
July 8-C3
May 08-C
May 08-C
May 08-C
May 08-C
POSTADSIL
August 21-C
August 20-C
August 23-C
August 20-C
August 20-C
August 20-C
August 10-C
August 21-C
August 10-C
August 6-C
August 6-C
August 18-C
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
64
66
71
82
83
83
84
84
84
84
85
85
85
88
90
90
92
OAT
73
81
82
83
85
85
85
86
87
89
91
90
EWB
57
56
57
58
55
53
57
55
56
55
57
59
56
58
55
59
59
EWB
59
59
63
60
60
65
57
59
58
60
60
65
El
79%
103%
79%
81%
80%
80%
83%
81%
867o
84%
81%
83%
83%
83%
83%
85%
84%
83.4%
El
83%
84%
88%
84%
89%
89%
88%
85%
92%
92%
96%
92%
88.5%
Cl
72%
103%
71%
75%
72%
73%
76%
73%
787o
77%
72%
76%
78%
77%
77%
81%
78%
77.0%
Cl
74%
76%
84%
78%
81%
81%
79%
78%
82%
87%
91%
88%
81.6%
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
kW
4.6
5.0
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
5.5
4.7
5.5
4.7
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.8
4.7
kW
4.6
4.6
4.8
4.7
4.7
5.6
5.5
4.6
5.5
5.8
5.8
5.8
Physical Power and Capacity Measurements
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
66
66
71
85
83
85
84
84
84
82
85
85
86
86
90
90
95
inlet
72
79
82
83
84
82
84
85
82
89
89
90
83.42
exhaust
89
88
96
107
105
106
107
107
106
106
108
108
109
108
111
116
115
exhaust
96
102
106
107
107
108
107
108
105
114
115
115
107.50
Cond Air
DT(K)
12.8
12.2
13.9
12.2
12.2
11.7
12.8
12.8
12.2
13.3
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.2
11.7
14.4
11.1
12.6
DT(K)
13.3
12.8
13.3
13.3
12.8
14.4
12.8
12.8
12.8
13.9
14.4
13.9
13.38
kW
4.8
4.6
4.8
5.3
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.6
5.4
kW
4.8
5.1
5.3
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.2
5.3
5.2
5.5
5.6
5.6
5.29
(kg/sec)
1.06
1.76
1.06
2.16
1.42
2.10
.06
.81
.08
.10
.06
.81
2.04
2.19
2.30
2.22
2.47
1.7
(kg/sec)
2.96
2.94
2.92
2.99
2.92
2.98
3.01
2.98
3.06
2.93
3.02
2.99
2.97
tons
3.87
6.16
4.21
7.55
4.98
7.00
3.87
6.61
3.79
8.0
3.87
6.62
7.5
7.66
7.68
9.17
7.86
tons
11.31
10.74
11.12
11.39
10.66
12.32
11.01
10.88
11.17
11.62
12.49
11.87
11.38
EER
9.68
16.06
10.52
17.10
11.72
16.16
8.76
15.26
8.75
18.52
8.93
15.29
16.87
17.03
17.07
19.65
17.46
14.4
EER
28.27
25.28
25.18
26.29
24.14
27.38
25.41
24.63
25.77
25.35
26.77
25.43
25.83
Change 6.1%
6.0%
6.3%
70.1%
79.3%
Appendix B
Page 27 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions | Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
OAT
64-C
66-C
71 -C
82-C
83-C
83-C1
84-C1
84-C2
84-C3
84-C3
85-C1
85-C2
85-C3
88-C
90-C
90-C1
92-C
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
4.6
#REF!
#REF!
5.0
#REF!
#REF!
4.6
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.6
#REF!
#REF!
5.5
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
5.5
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.8
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.8
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
CU
4.800
3.87
9.68
4.600
6.16
16.06
4.8
4.21
10.52
5.3
7.55
17.10
5.1
4.98
11.72
5.2
7.00
16.16
5.3
3.87
8.76
5.2
6.61
15.26
5.2
3.79
8.75
5.2
8.02
18.52
5.2
3.87
8.93
5.2
6.62
15.29
5.3
7.45
16.87
5.4
7.66
17.03
5.4
7.68
17.07
5.6
9.17
19.65
5.4
7.66
17.03
Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
96%
#REF!
#REF!
109%
#REF!
#REF!
96%
#REF!
#REF!
89%
#REF!
#REF!
92%
#REF!
#REF!
90%
#REF!
#REF!
89%
#REF!
#REF!
88%
#REF!
#REF!
106%
#REF!
#REF!
90%
#REF!
#REF!
106%
#REF!
#REF!
90%
#REF!
#REF!
91%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
86%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
Test Data
SA
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Literature
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Predicted/SA
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Predicted/CU
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Estimated
Degradation
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Appendix B
Page 28 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
73-C
81 -C
82-C
83-C
85-C
85-C1
85-C2
86-C
87-C
89-C
91 -C
90-C Clean
Evap
POST ADSIL
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
4.6
#REF!
#REF!
4.6
#REF!
#REF!
4.8
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
5.6
#REF!
#REF!
5.5
#REF!
#REF!
4.6
#REF!
#REF!
5.5
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
4.8
11.31
28.27
5.1
10.74
25.28
5.3
11.12
25.18
5.2
11.39
26.29
5.3
10.66
24.14
5.4
12.32
27.38
5.2
11.01
25.41
5.3
10.88
24.63
5.2
11.17
25.77
5.5
11.62
25.35
5.6
12.49
26.77
5.6
11.87
25.43
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
96%
#REF!
#REF!
90%
#REF!
#REF!
91%
#REF!
#REF!
90%
#REF!
#REF!
89%
#REF!
#REF!
104%
#REF!
#REF!
106%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
106%
#REF!
#REF!
105%
#REF!
#REF!
104%
#REF!
#REF!
104%
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Appendix B
Page 29 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
TABLE B-2
Copeland Compressor Test Summary at Ambient of 85 Degrees or Higher
(Maximum of 1 Test Per Temperature)
EER at ARI Conditions 9.4 BTU/W-h
Condensing unit CFM 3000 CFM (Listed)
Capacity at ARI 4.96 tons
Coil Area 15 sq-ft
Predicted EER = 7.40
Test Date
April 9-C1
May 08-C
May 08-C
May 08-C
POSTADSIL
August 20-C
August 20-C
August 21-C
August 10-C
August 6-C
August 6-C
August 18-C
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
85
88
90
92
OAT
85
85
86
87
89
91
90
EWB
57
58
55
59
EWB
60
65
59
58
60
60
65
El
81%
83%
83%
84%
82.8%
El
89%
89%
85%
92%
92%
96%
92%
90.7%
Cl
72%
77%
77%
78%
76.0%
Cl
81%
81%
78%
82%
87%
91%
88%
84.0%
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
EER
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
kW
5.5
4.7
4.7
4.7
kW
4.7
5.6
4.6
5.5
5.8
5.8
5.8
Physical Power and Capacity Measurements
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
85
86
90
95
inlet
84
82
85
82
89
89
90
85.86
exhaust
108
108
111
115
exhaust
107
108
108
105
114
115
115
110.29
Cond Air
DT(K)
12.8
12.2
11.7
11.1
DT(K)
12.8
14.4
12.8
12.8
13.9
14.4
13.9
13.57
kW
5.2
5.4
5.4
5.4
kW
5.3
5.4
5.3
5.2
5.5
5.6
5.6
5.41
(kg/sec)
1.06
2.19
2.30
2.47
(kg/sec)
2.92
2.98
2.98
3.06
2.93
3.02
2.99
2.98
tons
3.87
7.66
7.68
7.86
tons
10.66
12.32
10.88
11.17
11.62
12.49
11.87
11.57
EER
8.93
17.03
17.07
17.46
EER
24.14
27.38
24.63
25.77
25.35
26.77
25.43
25.64
Appendix B
Page 30 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions | Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
OAT
85-C1
88-C
90-C
92-C
85-C
85-C1
86-C
87-C
89-C
91 -C
90-C Clean
Evap
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
POST ADSIL
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
5.5
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
4.7
#REF!
#REF!
5.6
#REF!
#REF!
4.6
#REF!
#REF!
5.5
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
5.8
#REF!
#REF!
CU
5.2
3.87
8.93
5.4
7.66
17.03
5.4
7.68
17.07
5.4
7.66
17.03
5.3
10.66
24.14
5.4
12.32
27.38
5.3
10.88
24.63
5.2
11.17
25.77
5.5
11.62
25.35
5.6
12.49
26.77
5.6
11.87
25.43
Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
106%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
89%
#REF!
#REF!
104%
#REF!
#REF!
87%
#REF!
#REF!
106%
#REF!
#REF!
105%
#REF!
#REF!
104%
#REF!
#REF!
104%
#REF!
#REF!
Test Data
SA
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Literature
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
CU/Lit
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
SA/CU
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
#REF!
Predicted/SA
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Predicted/CU
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Estimated
Degradation
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
.
.
#REF!
-
-
#REF!
Appendix B
Page 31 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 91 Degrees
August 6, 2004 3:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
242
24.5
5.6
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
10
5
62
79
221
95
91
36
40
14
109
18
80
55
30%
85%
99%
97%
5.9
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
10
5
69
63
231
96
91
40
22
16
111
21
80
55
30%
85%
96%
91%
5.8
;ti mates
89 F 305
115 F 319
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5340
3.02 kg/sec
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
12.49 Tons
26.77 EER
0.45 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.7
6.7
6.1
5.9
5.5
5.5
6.1
6.3
6.6
5.9
5.3
5.7
5.1
5.3
5.7
5.9
5.5
7
5.933
Appendix B
Page 32 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 90 Degrees
August 18, 2004 3:50 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL, CLEAN EVAP
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
241
24.5
5.6
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
10
5
67
49
226
94
89
39
11
16
109
20
82
53
40%
85%
94%
96%
6.2
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
10
5
67
48
225
93
89
39
10
16
109
20
82
53
40%
85%
92%
88%
5.8
;ti mates
90 F 305
115 F 319
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5275
2.99 kg/sec
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
11.87 Tons
25.43 EER
0.47 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6
6
6.8
7.2
5.6
5.4
6.3
6.3
6.7
5.3
5
4.4
6.8
6.2
5.3
5.5
5.5
5.2
5.861
Appendix B
Page 33 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 89 Degrees
August 6, 2004 3:30 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
243
24
5.5
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic Copeland 6CRN5-0500-PFV-27C
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity Es
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
10
5
66
48
225
93
89
38
9
16
109
20
80
55
30%
85%
93%
95%
6.1
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
10
5
66
48
225
93
89
38
9
16
109
20
80
55
30%
85%
92%
87%
5.8
;ti mates
89 F 305
114 F 319
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5165
2.93 kg/sec
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
11.62 Tons
25.35 EER
0.47 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.5
5.9
4.5
5.4
5.6
6.1
5.6
5.6
5.8
6.5
4.8
5
6.1
6.2
6.8
5.5
5.6
5.8
5.739
Appendix B
Page 34 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 87 Degrees
August-ID, 2004 10:50 A.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
244
23
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
10
5
61
48
201
87
87
34
13
15
102
15
76
59
35%
85%
94%
90%
5.8
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
82 F
105 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5395
3.06 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
10
5
60
44
204
88
88
34
10
15
103
15
76
59
35%
85%
92%
82%
5.5
301
314
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
11.17 Tons
25.77 EER
0.47 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.6
6.8
5.5
6.1
5.5
5.5
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.7
5.3
5.1
6.8
6.6
7.2
6.2
5.5
5.3
5.994
Appendix B
Page 35 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 86 Degrees
August 21, 2004 11:40 A.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
241
23.4
5.3
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
61
42
208
91
86
35
7
14
105
19
74
48
40%
85%
88%
87%
4.9
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
85 F
108 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5255
2.98 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
61
42
208
91
86
35
7
14
105
19
74
48
40%
85%
85%
78%
4.6
303
315
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
10.88 Tons
24.63 EER
0.49 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.1
6.8
6
5.8
5.6
5.5
5.4
5.6
5.2
6.1
6.3
5.6
6.5
6.4
6.4
5.8
5.4
4.6
5.839
Appendix B
Page 36 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 85 Degrees
August-ID, 2004 11:15 A.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
244
22.9
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
10
5
60
41
201
88
85
33
8
14
102
18
75
60
30%
85%
88%
85%
5.8
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
84 F
107 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5320
3.01 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
10
5
60
41
201
88
85
33
8
14
102
18
75
60
30%
85%
88%
79%
5.5
302
315
Low
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
11.01 Tons
25.41 EER
0.47 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.8
7
5.7
5.9
5.9
6.1
5.7
5.9
6.1
6.2
4.9
5.1
6.8
6.4
4.9
5.3
5.5
6.2
5.911
Appendix B
Page 37 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 85 Degrees
August 20, 2004 3:15 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
242
23.5
5.4
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
59
70
200
91
85
34
36
11
102
18
83
53
37%
85%
88%
85%
5.6
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
82 F
108 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5265
2.98 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
63
69
207
90
85
36
32
14
104
19
83
53
37%
85%
89%
81%
5.6
301
315
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
12.32 Tons
27.38 EER
0.44 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
5.8
6.2
6.7
6.8
5.7
5.3
5.1
5.5
5.5
6.1
6.2
5.1
6.4
6.8
6.6
5.5
5.3
4.7
5.850
Appendix B
Page 38 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 85 Degrees
August 20, 2004 5:15 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
241
23.1
5.3
0.95
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
62
43
208
88
85
35
8
16
104
19
76
48
40%
85%
88%
85%
4.9
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
84 F
107 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5150
2.92 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
62
43
208
88
85
35
8
16
104
19
76
48
40%
85%
89%
81%
4.7
302
315
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
10.66 Tons
24.14 EER
0.50 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.4
6.2
5.7
5.5
5.7
5.7
5.2
6.2
5.5
6.1
5.1
5.1
6.2
6.4
6.6
5.1
5.5
4.8
5.722
Appendix B
Page 39 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 83 Degrees
August 20, 2004 5:30 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
242
22.9
5.2
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
61
42
206
88
83
35
8
15
103
20
76
48
40%
85%
88%
87%
4.9
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
83 F
107 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5275
2.99 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
61
42
206
88
83
35
8
15
103
20
76
48
40%
85%
84%
78%
4.7
301
315
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
11.39 Tons
26.29 EER
0.46 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.8
6.6
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.7
5.5
6
5.2
6.4
6.2
5.3
6.3
6.4
6.5
5.4
5.2
4.5
5.861
Appendix B
Page 40 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 82 Degrees
August 23, 2004 5:30 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
243
23.1
5.3
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
66
57
203
84
82
38
18
18
102
21
80
52
40%
85%
95%
95%
5
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
82 F
106 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5150
2.92 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
66
57
203
84
82
38
18
18
102
21
80
52
40%
85%
88%
84%
4.8
301
314
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
K
K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
11.12 Tons
25.18 EER
0.48 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.4
6.8
6.2
5.7
5.5
5.7
5.3
6.2
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.5
6.2
6.2
6.4
5.4
5.1
5.1
5.722
Appendix B
Page 41 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 81 Degrees
August 20, 2004 6:40 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
242
22.4
5.1
0.94
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
59
40
191
84
81
33
6
15
98
18
74
46
40%
85%
87%
85%
4.9
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
79 F
102 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5190
2.94 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
59
40
191
84
81
33
6
15
98
18
74
46
40%
85%
84%
76%
4.6
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
299 K
312 K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
10.74 Tons
25.28 EER
0.47 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.6
6.6
6.1
5.6
5.8
5.4
6.2
5.8
5.6
6
4.1
4.9
6.3
6.3
6.2
5.9
5.3
5.1
5.767
Appendix B
Page 42 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Test at 73 Degrees
August 21, 2004 3:00 P.M.
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
POSTADSIL
Carrier
38TH060300
Split system
1991
Gainesville
Toms Home unit
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
Input SEER
Input Cap
SP
ST
LP
LT
OAT
ET
SH
SC
CT
COA
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Predicted KW
CU Capacity E;
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
245
21.4
4.8
0.92
HVAC Service Assistant Measurement
Generic
12
5
56
47
170
76
73
31
16
15
91
18
74
46
40%
85%
86%
81%
4.7
Cope
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
timates
72 F
96 F
in
in
15.0sq-ft
5235
2.96 kg/sec
and 6CRN5-0500-PFV-270
12
5
56
47
170
76
73
31
16
15
91
18
74
46
40%
85%
83%
74%
4.6
F
F
%
%
%
%
kW
295 K
309 K
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
11.31 Tons
28.27 EER
0.42 kW/Ton
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Average
ft/sec
6.3
7.2
6
5.9
5.7
5.5
6.2
6.3
6.6
5.5
5.3
4.3
5.6
6.2
6
5.6
5.2
5.3
5.817
Appendix B
Page 43 of 43
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Residential Split System Tests
-------
Appendix C
Commercial 5-Ton Split-system Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.6
5.5
5.4
5.0
5.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
212.0
15.7 4
kW Difference
5 0.78
0.17
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
211
212
tMeasurment
10
76
56
25
85
95%
92%
5
83
5.80
15.4 3
12.9 1.
2 0.99
13 0.41
4.33
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
82 F
99 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
6727
3.81 kg/sec
10.29 Tons
28.52 EER
301 K
310 K
Appendix C
Pagel of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.4
5.9
5.2
4.4
5.0
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
212.0
15.9 4
kW Difference
6 0.78
0.16
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
212
212
tMeasurment
10
73
53
24
85
95%
93%
5
84
5.90
15.8 3
13.05 1.
3 0.99
14 0.41
4.44
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
86 F
100 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
6530
3.70 kg/sec
8.23 Tons
22.23 EER
303 K
311 K
Appendix C
Page 2 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.3
5.4
3.8
4.4
4.5
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
215.0
15.9 4
kW Difference
6 0.78
0.18
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
214
215
tMeasurment
10
73
53
30
85
97%
96%
5
86
5.90
15.5 3
13.23 1.
3 0.99
12 0.40
4.42
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
86 F
100 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
5873
3.33 kg/sec
7.40 Tons
20.09 EER
303 K
311 K
Appendix C
Page 3 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.8
5.8
4.8
4.8
5.3
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
212.0
13.5 4
kW Difference
0 0.82
0.61
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
212
212
tMeasurment
10
74
54
24
85
96%
94%
5
87
5.90
16.1 3
13.6 1.
4 0.99
24 0.43
4.64
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
103 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
6956
3.94 kg/sec
10.02 Tons
25.90 EER
304 K
313 K
Appendix C
Page 4 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.4
5.4
4.4
5.0
5.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
213.0
13.7 4
kW Difference
0 0.80
0.6
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
212
213
tMeasurment
10
73
53
24
85
95%
93%
5
88
5.90
16.3 3
13.7 1
4 0.99
2 0.41
4.60
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
88 F
102 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
6628
3.75 kg/sec
8.35 Tons
21. 78 EER
304 K
312 K
Appendix C
Page 5 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.4
6.0
4.6
5.0
5.3
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
213.0
13.8 4
kW Difference
1 0.82
0.54
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
213
213
tMeasurment
10
74
54
28
85
97%
97%
5
88
6.00
16.15 3
13.8 1.
4 0.99
26 0.43
4.66
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
103 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
6891
3.90 kg/sec
9.92 Tons
25.55 EER
304 K
313 K
Appendix C
Page 6 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.6
6.1
4.9
6.0
5.7
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
213.0
16.4 4
kW Difference
8 0.79
0.16
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
214
214
tMeasurment
10
74
54
26
85
96%
95%
5
89
6.00
16.1 3
13.8 1.
4 0.99
24 0.42
4.64
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90 F
105 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
7416
4.20 kg/sec
10.01 Tons
25.89 EER
305 K
314 K
Appendix C
Page 7 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
1
0.5
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
3.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.9
6.9
6.7
5.4
6.2
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
213.0
16.7 5
0 0.8
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
212
212
tMeasurment
10
76
56
25
85
98%
98%
5
92
6.00
16.5 3
14.1 1.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
94 F
110 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
8170
4.63 kg/sec
11. 76 Tons
29.35 EER
5 0.99
31 0.44
308 K
316 K
Appendix C
Page 8 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.8
7.3
7.0
5.4
6.6
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
213.0
16.0 4
kW Difference
8 0.81
0.18
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
212
213
tMeasurment
10
76
56
34
85
98%
94%
5
89
5.80
16.1 3
13.9 1.
4 0.99
22 0.41
4.62
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
105 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
8695
4.92 kg/sec
14.09 Tons
36.59 EER
304 K
314 K
Appendix C
Page 9 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.5
6.8
5.9
5.9
6.0
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
213.0
15.6 4
kW Difference
5 0.79
0.04
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
212
213
tMeasurment
10
74
54
40
85
96%
95%
5
85
5.90
15.6 3
13.3 1.
3 0.99
16 0.41
4.46
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
86 F
101 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
7908
4.48 kg/sec
10.67 Tons
28.72 EER
303 K
311 K
Appendix C
Page 10 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.5
6.8
5.9
5.5
5.9
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
212.0
16.1 4
kW Difference
8 0.81
0.15
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
211
212
tMeasurment
10
73
53
28
85
99%
96%
5
89
5.90
16.2 3
13.8 1.
4 0.99
25 0.43
4.65
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
103 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
7777
4.40 kg/sec
11. 20 Tons
28.90 EER
304 K
313 K
Appendix C
Page 11 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.8
6.4
5.4
5.2
5.7
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
214.0
16.4 4
kW Difference
9 0.80
0.6
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
211
213
tMeasurment
10
76
56
29
85
94%
90%
5
82
5.80
15.1 3
12.7 1
2 0.99
1 0.41
4.30
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
84 F
99 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
7481
4.24 kg/sec
10. 10 Tons
28. 18 EER
302 K
310 K
Appendix C
Page 12 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.2
7.1
6
5.1
6.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
214.0
16.4 4
kW Difference
9 0.80
0.29
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
213
214
tMeasurment
10
74
54
35
85
99%
98%
5
91
5.90
16.1 3
13.7 1.
4 0.99
21 0.41
4.61
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90 F
105 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
8006
4.53 kg/sec
10.81 Tons
28. 13 EER
305 K
314 K
Appendix C
Page 13 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.7
6.3
5.9
5.9
6.2
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
214.0
15.9 4
kW Difference
7 0.80
0.13
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
213
214
tMeasurment
10
76
56
21
85
97%
93%
5
88
5.80
15.9 3
13.22 1.
4 0.99
17 0.41
4.57
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90 F
105 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
8138
4.61 kg/sec
10.98 Tons
28.84 EER
305 K
314 K
Appendix C
Page 14 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC060
SS Heat pump
2001
MACTEC Hendrickson
HP-7
17.0 Amps
230 Volts
0.86
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
9.3
9.3
4.67
3
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.40
Nameplate Voltage: 230
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.11
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.8 kW
0.23 kW
0.13 kW
6.04 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.9
5.0
6.5
5.5
5.5
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
3-Phase
212.0
15.9 4
kW Difference
7 0.80
0.13
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
212
212
tMeasurment
10
76
56
29
85
97%
93%
5
88
5.80
16 3
13.28 1.
4 0.99
17 0.41
4.57
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
89 F
104 F
90 in
35 n
22 sq-ft
7186
4.07 kg/sec
9.70 Tons
25.47 EER
305 K
313 K
Appendix C
Page 15 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
TABLE 4-5
Unit 2 Baseline Study
Generic Compressor Test Summary-All Temperatures
EERatARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
9.27 BTU/W-h
3300 CFM (Listed)
4.67 tons
22 sq-ft
9.07 BTU/W-h
Test Date
PRE
POST
24-May
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1-Jul
1 6-Aug
1 6-Aug
11-Aug
11-Aug
31-Aug
31-Aug
31-Aug
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
92
89
88
88
87
86
84
83
Averages
91
89
89
85
82
88
88
EWB
57
55
55
54
54
56
54
55
57
54
59
59
57
54
57
El
98%
96%
97%
95%
96%
97%
95%
95%
96%
99%
99%
98%
96%
94%
97%
97%
Cl
98%
95%
97%
93%
94%
96%
93%
92%
95%
98%
96%
94%
95%
90%
93%
93%
EER
8.83
9.01
9.24
9.04
9.27
9.52
9.58
9.73
9.05
9.28
9.24
9.60
9.80
9.23
9.26
Cap
4.24
4.16
4.26
4.08
4.14
4.26
4.15
4.13
4.26
4.20
4.13
4.25
4.07
4.08
4.10
kW
5.60
5.60
5.60
5.51
5.51
5.51
5.51
5.42
5.51
5.51
5.42
5.51
5.80
5.80
5.80
Averages 97% 94%
Change 1.1% -0.64%
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
94
90
87
88
87
86
86
82
90
87
87
86
84
90
89
exhaust
110
105
103
102
103
100
100
99
105
103
105
101
99
105
104
Cond Air
fll (K.)
8.9
8.3
8.9
7.8
8.9
7.8
7.8
9.4
8.47
8.3
8.9
10.0
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
kW
4.81
4.64
4.66
4.60
4.64
4.42
4.44
4.33
4.61
4.65
4.62
4.46
4.3
4.57
4.57
(kg/sec)
4.63
4.20
3.90
3.75
3.94
3.33
3.70
3.81
3.91
4.53
4.40
4.92
4.48
4.24
4.61
4.07
tons
11.76
10.01
9.92
8.35
10.02
7.40
8.23
10.29
10.81
11.20
14.09
10.67
10.10
10.98
9.70
EER
29.35
25.89
25.55
21.78
25.90
20.09
22.23
28.52
24.92
28.13
28.90
36.59
28.72
28.18
28.84
25.47
cfm adj
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
EER Adj
11.15
9.84
9.71
8.28
9.84
7.63
8.45
10.84
9.47
10.69
10.98
13.90
10.91
10.71
10.96
9.68
8.65 4.47 29.26 0.38 11.12
2.11% 14.29% 17.45% 17.45%
Appendix C
Page 16 of 16
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Commercial 5-Ton System Tests
-------
-------
Appendix D
Eckerd's and MACTEC
-------
Eckerd Rooftop Units
Two rooftop units on an Eckerd drug store in Clearwater, Florida were instrumented by ADSIL, prior to a
routine condenser cleaning (per standard operating procedures), and followed later by cleaning and
coating using the Adsil treatment. The testing/cleaning schedule for the units was as follows:
Date
April 27, 2004
May 5, 2004
(8:00 AM -4: 00PM)
May 19, 2004
(9:30 AM- 2:00 PM)
May 3 1,2004
Event
Units instrumented and data collection
begins
Condensers cleaned using standard
methods (per SOP)
Condensers cleaned and coated using
ADSIL treatment
Data collection ends
Eight data points were collected at 10-minute intervals for each unit. Data collected included refrigerant
temperature entering and leaving the condenser, refrigerant suction and discharge pressures, ambient
temperature, and current for each of the three phases on the unit's main electrical service. The current
measurements were converted to power (assuming a constant power factor of 0.85) by:
Power (kW) =
208 x V3 x Avg(Ia,Ib,Ic) x 0.85
1000
Figure 1 displays the observed operating patterns of the two units during the monitoring period. The units
displayed two typical operating powers near 8 kW and 15 kW, corresponding to first and second stage
cooling operation. With the exception of a few hours where unit #2 operated the fan without any
cooling1, the units operated the first stage compressor nearly continuously. The second stage compressor
is observed to cycle on during the afternoon hours, coincident with the peak cooling load.
The bottom plots are shade plots of the unit power. On the shade plot each day is represented by a
vertical strip consisting of 144 10-minute data records. Periods of high power consumption are shown by
darker shades of grey. Periods of missing data (such as where the units were being cleaned and coated by
Adsil) are shown in bright white. The shade plot reveals that unit #2 operated in second stage cooling
more frequently than unit #1. Periods where unit #1 was observed to be off (May 4-7 and May 27-30,
midnight to noon) are readily observed.
1 In mid-May there were several hours with an operating power of 3 kW for this unit, a typical value for the supply
fan on this size unit.
CDH Energy Corp.
June 23, 2004
-------
Eckerd Unit #1 Power
Eckerd Unit #2 Power
20
15
10
o
Baseline
Adsil Coating
20
15
10
0
Std. Cleaning
Adsil Coating
26 3
April May
2004
10
17
24
31
26 3
April May
2004
10
17
24
31
Eckerd Unit#1 Operating Pattern
Eckerd Unit #2 Operating Pattern
2829301 2345678 910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
April May
Day (MAX/MN= 17.45/ 0.00 kW)
Figure 1. Rooftop Unit Operating Patterns
2829301 2345678 910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031
April May
Day (MAWMN= 16.95/ 0.00 kW)
The following figure displays the observed condenser performance across the three periods. The data
were averaged to hourly values to reduce the amount of scatter. No significant difference was observed
between any of the periods. Most significant is the lack of any impact on either the saturated discharge
temperature or liquid temperature leaving the condenser. These two parameters tend to have the largest
impact on any increase in efficiency from condenser treatment.
Also shown is the saturated suction temperature variation with ambient. Again, little change can be
observed between the three periods, indicating that no change would have occurred in the supply air
temperature.
CDH Energy Corp.
June 23, 2004
-------
100
95
E 9°
s>
3
2 85
a
E
0
I- 80
75
70 L_
50
Eckerd Unit#1
Refrigerant Temp Drop Across Condenser
60
70 80 90
Ambient Temperature (F)
1201
E
0
1- SO
100
60L
50
Refrigerant Leaving Condenser
60
70 80
Ambient Temperature (F)
90
100
135
130
E 125
I
1° 120
0
115
110
105L
50
Saturated Discharge Temperature
60
70 80 90
Ambient Temperature (F)
36
34
I
1° 32
30
28
100
50
60
Subcooling
70 80
Ambient Temperature (F)
90
100
50
45
0
H 40
0
Q.
E
35
30
50
Saturated Suction Temperature
A -
'V A ,
^ T v
60 70 80 90
Ambient Temperature (F)
100
+ Baseline (Apr 28 - May 04)
» Std Cleaning (May 06-May 18)
A Adsil Coating (May 20 - May 31)
Figure 2. Condenser Performance - Unit 1
CDH Energy Corp.
June 23, 2004
-------
80
£
5> 75
=3
2
a
I 70
65
60L
50
Eckerd Unit #2
Refrigerant Temp Drop Across Condenser
60
70 80 90
Ambient Temperature (F)
•\2or~"
100
I- 80
100
60L
50
Refrigerant Leaving Condenser
60 70 80 90
Ambient Temperature (F)
100
140
120
100
80^
50
Saturated Discharge Temperature
60 70 80 90
Ambient Temperature (F)
Subcooling
100
40
35
; 30
25
20
15
ioL_
50
60 70 80
Ambient Temperature (F)
90
100
Saturated Suction Temperature
50
45
£
o
£ 40
£
o
\—
35
30l i i i i
50 60 70 80 90 100
Ambient Temperature (F)
Figure 3. Condenser Performance - Unit 2
Baseline (Apr 28 - May 04)
Std Cleaning (May 06-May 18)
Adsil Coating (May 20 - May 31)
CDH Energy Corp.
June 23, 2004
-------
Figure 4 and Figure 5 displays the daily energy variation with ambient temperature for each unit. The
high degree of cycling operation between first and second stage cooling observed required summing the
power data collected to daily data for analysis purposes.
To assess the impact of the Adsil coating on the daily energy, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model
was developed. The model incorporated a dummy variable to describe the impact of the coating (dummy
= 1 for the Adsil period, dummy = 0 for the baseline period). Also shown on the plot are the t-ratios for
the regression coefficients. The t-ratio describes the statistical significance of each coefficient.
Coefficients with t-ratio with an absolute value greater than 2.0 indicate that the coefficients are
statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval.
Eckerd Unit #1
2000
1500
(0
T3
.*:
D)
1000
500
o
A
Baseline (Apr 29 - May 03)
Std Cleaning (May 07 - May 18)
Adsil Coating (May 20 - May 31)
kWh/day = 3239.5 + 59.8 * TAO - 35.6 * DUMMY
t-ratios:-8.5, 12.4,-1.5
70
75 80
Ambient Temperature (F)
85
90
Figure 4. Unit 1 Daily Energy Variation with Ambient
CDH Energy Corp.
June 23, 2004
-------
Eckerd Unit #2
2000
1500
(0
T3
.*:
D)
1000
500
o
A
Baseline (Apr 28 - May 04)
Std Cleaning (May 06 - May 18)
Adsil Coating (May 20 - May 31)
kWh/day = 2863.7 + 56.8 * TAO - 46.8 * DUMMY
t-ratios: -5.4, 8.4, -1.2
70
75 80
Ambient Temperature (F)
85
90
Figure 5. Unit 2 Daily Energy Variation with Ambient
The regression coefficients indicate that after the Adsil coating was applied, compared to the baseline, unit
#1 used 35.6 less kilowatt-hours per day and unit #2 used 46.8 less kilowatt-hours per day. Annual
savings were determined by applying the regression model to daily temperature data for Tampa, FL from
the Department of Energy typical meteorological year data set (TMY2). Savings calculations assume no
cooling operation when the average daily temperature is less than 50°F (15 days/year). Unfortunately, the
t-ratio for the dummy variable (the savings coefficient) was not greater than 2.0, indicating that the savings
were not statistically significant.
Table 1. Annual Impact From Adsil Coating
Unit
Unit#l
Unit #2
Baseline Energy
Use
(kWh/year)
384,402
439,142
Energy Use After
Adsil Coating
(kWh/year)
371,942
422,753
Savings
(kWh/vear / %)
12,460 / 3.2%
16,389 / 3.9%
Statistically
Significant
(t-ratio > 2.0)
No
No
A visual inspection of the daily energy data indicates that the standard cleaning had no impact on the
energy consumption of the units. In fact, for unit #2 energy consumption appears to have slightly
increased.
CDH Energy Corp.
June 23, 2004
-------
-------
Appendix E
Honeywell Service Assistant
-------
*•
iagnostics
ASHRAE s Most Innovative
Product of the Year 2003
HVAC Service Asistant
HVAC Service Provider
Multi-Unit Facility Manager
HVAC Service Assistant
Virtual Mechanic
Honeywell
i IVAC Service Assistant
Highlights
• 2003 AHR Expo Innovation Award Winner Use award winning technology to increase sales and improve productivity.
• First Efficiency Estimating Tool The Service Assistant's patented technology instantly displays the energy efficiency of a/c units. This revolutionary index identifies energy
savings opportunities and provides objective documentation of the benefits.
• Honeywell provides worldwide distribution The Service Assistant complements a family of Honeywell products designed to reduce HVAC operating costs through energy
savings in commercial buildings.
-------
Service Assistant Features
• Automated objective performance data collection
• Integrated fault detection (service needed? y/n) and diagnostics (what service?)
• Record and display the raw data and its interpretations on the PDA and its designated database
• Displays efficiency and capacity estimates with potential energy savings (more...)
• Estimates indoor air flow in cfm/ton
• Create customized task lists to standardize service procedures and field data collection
• Allows technicians to note required follow up work
• Technician can print for customer a UNIT REPORT CARD (see example) on site (optional printer required)
• Equipment applications include:
O Packaged equipment (including rooftop units)
O Split systems (including standard residential a/c units)
O Full diagnostics of cooling only and heat pumps operating in cooling mode
• ServiceAssistantOnline Web Service Communicate to clients, management, and end users recent service activity and resulting benefits (more...)
Features in Development
• Heat pump in heating mode diagnostics
• Diagnose units under cooler outdoor temperatures, helping to extend your cooling service/sales season
• Improve efficiency through sophisticated service recommendations when diagnostics indicates "No Faults Detected"
Accessories
Single and two stage sensor arrays expand the Service Assistant's measurement capabilities.
Product Demonstrations
• Download the Service Assistant Palm application running in an emulator on your PC (7MB) Run a full featured demonstration on your PC with demo data.
• Inquire about a live Service Assistant demonstration
O Visit our office for a demonstration of the Service Assistant directly for the development team!
O Print this
O Contact Field Diagnostic Services for help arranging for a product demonstration.
Free Downloads
• Download for FREE... SACalc - a refrigeration cycle analysis Palm Pilot application
O Easily enter pressure and temperature measurements ...like using a hand calculator.
O Performance indices are calculated including evaporating and condensing temperatures, condensing temperature over ambient, superheat and subcooling
based on integrated refrigerant property tables.
O Superheat for fixed orifice units is evaluated based on entered data.
-------
More Information
• Honeywell Catalog page for the Service Assistant See Honeywell's presentation of Service Assistant benefits and features. Download cut sheets and instructions that are
provided with the tool. Get list prices.
• American Express and Honeywell team up to provide leasing for the Service Assistant Easily achieve positive cash flow in the first month with the Service Assistant's
leasing option.
• Honeywell HVAC Service Assistant product cut sheet The cut sheet is a compact (2 sides of 1 page) full color description of the product.
• Refrigeration Cycle Diagnostics Overview This detailed document explains the technical underpinnings of how the Service Assistant analyzes data to provide diagnostics. It
includes a discussion of the more challenging aspects of data interpretation.
• Estimating Efficiency and Capacity
and capacity estimator technology.
• Technology Report - /
electric power demand and consumption. It is helpful for utility program managers and facility managers interested is applying the Service Assistant's patented technology
to cost effectively reduce utility bills.
• ServiceAssistantOnline web service helps all HVAC service stake holders better communicate.
• Before and After Report documents energy savings from strategically servicing units on a big box retail store.
• Service Assistant Wins 2003 AHR Expo Innovative Product Award The Service Assistant is the most innovative "Tool, Instrument, or Software" for 2003 in the HVAC
Industry.
• Field Diagnostic Services Inc. is a leading edge developer of HVAC equipment monitoring and diagnostic technology.
Purchasing the Service Assistant
• Contact your local Honeywell sales representative or distributor. Print this Honeywell cut sheet for a clear definition of the product and its Honeywell part numbers.
• Contact Field Diagnostic Services directly to learn how to purchase a Service Assistant.
-------
Appendix F
EER Test Data from Units in SEQL Area
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38AE-012-500
T890439
Split System
1989
YTC Truck School
SS-1
43.6 Amps
208 Volts
0.65
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
10.7
10.7
9.19
15
6%
9.1
1.31
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
0.50 Amps (Average of 2) Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
2
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
1
0.75
0.25
0.1
0.75
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
10.2 kW
0.15 kW
0.00 kW
10.34 kW-Condensing side only
5.7% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
4.3
4.1
3.9
4.3
3.7
4.9
4.2
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
208
208
t Measurment
10
77
57
33
85
98%
97%
10
85
11.80
24.0 6
30.4 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
89 F
104.5 F
133 in
31 in
28.6 sq-ft
7215
4.09 kg/sec
10.06 Tons
12.71 EER
0.94 kW/Ton
1 0.99
4 0.54
305 K
313 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Truck School SS-1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier Published EER:
38AE-012-500 Calculated EER:
T890439 Nominal Capacity:
Split System Age
1989 CoilConditon
YTC Truck School Present Condition EER
SS-1 kW/ton
43.6 Amps Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.65 Compressor quantity:
0.5 Amps Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
10.7
10.7
9.2
15
0%
9.6
1.25
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
10.2 kW
0.15 kW
0.00 kW
10.34 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
2
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
10.2
5.5
10.5
10.5
9.2
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
207
209
t Measurment
10
77
57
33
85
107%
1 03%
10
86
11.60
29.6 5
28.9 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
88 F
97 F
133 in
31 in
28.63 sq-ft
15762
8.93 kg/sec
12.77 Tons
17.21 EER
0.70 kW/Ton
7 0.99
2 0.56
304 K
309 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Truck School SS-1
-------
YTC Truck School
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-1 Summary
10.7 BTU/W-h
7215 CFM (Measured)
9.19 tons
10.00 tons
28.63 sq-ft
9.13 pre 9.60 post
Equipment age
15 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
85
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
86
ST-SH
42
43
El
98%
107%
Cl
97%
103%
EER
12.2
13.2
kW
10.84
10.66
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
89
88
exhaust
104.5
97
Cond Air
AT(K)
8.6
5.0
kW
9.5
8.9
(kg/sec)
4.09
8.93
tons
10.06
12.77
EER
12.71
17.21
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
10.84
9.88
12.2
10.66
10.62
13.2
CU
9.5
10.06
12.71
8.9
12.77
17.21
Lit
9.85
10.19
12.42
10.00
10.31
12.38
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
110%
97%
98%
107%
103%
107%
CU/Lit
96%
99%
102%
89%
124%
139%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
85%
100%
100%
90%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
11.4
8.9
10.5
11.0
9.5
11.4
CU
9.9
9.1
10.9
9.2
11.4
14.9
Literature
10.31
9.19
10.69
10.31
9.19
10.69
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
110%
97%
98%
107%
103%
107%
CU/Lit
96%
99%
102%
89%
1 24%
1 39%
SA/CU
114%
98%
96%
120%
83%
77%
Predicted/SA
87%
-
80%
Predicted/CU
83%
-
61%
Predicted/
Original
85%
-
90%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
12.2
13.2
10.4
11.4
9.2%
Condenser Test
12.71
17.21
10.91
14.82
35.9%
Spreadsheet
9.13
9.60
9.13
9.60
5.1%
Weighted Average 91.8
358.6%
51.4%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Truck School SS-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38ASQ008
1396G00194
Split Heat Pump
1991
YTC Student Services
HP-1
14.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.66
1.90 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.4 kW
0.61 kW
0.00 kW
8.02 kW-Condensing side only
11.1
11.1
7.40
13
7.5%
9.6
1.25
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition _
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
7.5% Performance Degradation
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
.
.
.
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps
1
2
3
kW PF
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP1
10
91%
82%
7.5
74
7.10
kW PF
F
F
Tons (Each)
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
F - K
F - K
in
in
sq-ft
(From Product Data)
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Services HP-1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38ASQ008
1396G00194
Split Heat Pump
1991
YTC Student Services
HP-1
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
11.1
11.1
7.40
13
0%
10.2
1.17
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
14.1 Amps Power supply:
460.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Compressor quantity:
1.9 Amps Power supply:
460.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.4 kW
0.61 kW
0.00 kW
8.02 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
-
-
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP 1
10
-
.
1 09%
101%
7.5
83
8.50
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
F - K
F - K
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Services HP-1
-------
YTC Student Services
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
HP-1 Summary
11.1 BTU/W-h
NA CFM (Measured)
7.40
7.50 tons
NA sq-ft
9.57 pre 10.23 post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
74
EWB
60
El
91%
Cl
82%
EER
12.2
kW
7.01
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
NA
deg F
exhaust
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
NA
kW
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
tons
NA
EER
NA
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
83
60
109%
101%
13.1
8.39
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
7.01
6.03
12.2
8.39
7.15
13.1
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
6.59
7.35
13.39
7.07
7.08
12.02
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
106%
82%
91%
1 1 9%
101%
1 09%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
101%
100%
86%
101%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
8.5
6.1
10.1
9.5
7.5
12.1
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
7.97
7.40
11.15
7.97
7.40
11.15
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
106%
82%
91%
1 1 9%
101%
1 09%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
94%
79%
Predicted/CU
NA
NA
Predicted/
Original
86%
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
12.2
13.1
10.1
12.1
19.8%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
9.57
10.23
9.57
10.23
6.9%
Weighted Average 148.4%
NA
51.6%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Services HP-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
48DJE006630
2891G07552
Package Cool
1991
YTC Student Center
RTU-25
7.8 Amps
460 Volts
0.87
1 .00
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.00
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.4 kW
0.56 kW
1.93 kW
5.96 kW-Condensing side only
10.4
10.4
5.19
13
5%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-Phase
1.73
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
3-Phase
1.73
2
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0.5
X
X
2.7% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
474
475
tMeasurment
COMP1
10
72
52
55
85
76%
82%
5
84
3.00
9 4
9 1
F
F
%
%
Tons
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
84 F
97 F
NAin
NAin
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NAEER
4 1
8 0.42
302 K
309 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Center RTU-25
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
48DJE006630
2891G07552
Package Cool
1991
YTC Student Center
RTU-25
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
10.4
10.4
5.19
13
0%
9.5
1.26
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
7.8 Amps Power supply:
460.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.9 Compressor quantity:
1.0 Amps Power supply:
460.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.00 Amps
Nameplate Voltage: 460.00 Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.4 kW
0.56 kW
1.93 kW
5.96 kW-Condensing side only
3-Phase
1.73
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
3-Phase
1.73
2.00
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0.01
X
X
0.1% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP 1
10
81%
88%
5
86
6.40
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
NA F NA K
NA F NA K
NA in
NA in
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Center RTU-25
-------
YTC Student Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-25 Summary
10.4 BTU/W-h
- CFM (Measured)
5.19
5.00 tons
- sq-ft
9.10 Pre 9.51 Post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
84
EWB
61
El
76%
Cl
82%
EER
8.4
kW
3.11
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
NA
deg F
exhaust
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
NA
kW
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
tons
NA
EER
NA
Post Adsil Measurements
86
61
81%
88%
8.7
6.64
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
3.11
4.02
8.4
6.64
4.27
8.7
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
5.34
4.90
11.02
5.41
4.85
10.77
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
58%
82%
76%
123%
88%
81%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
99%
100%
88%
99%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
3.5
4.3
7.9
7.4
4.6
8.4
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
6.00
5.19
10.38
6.00
5.19
10.38
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
58%
82%
76%
123%
88%
81%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
115%
108%
Predicted/CU
NA
NA
Predicted/
Original
88%
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
8.4
8.7
7.9
8.4
6.6%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
9.10
9.51
9.10
9.51
4.5%
Weighted Average 32.9%
NA
22.7%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Center RTU-25
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38AD028610
A494368
Split System
1994
YTC Student Center
Ground Unit
54.4 Amps
460 Volts
0.65
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
24.17
10
7.2
1.67
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3.00 Amps (Average of 2) Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
3-phase
1.73
1
3-Phase
1.73
3
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
1
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.25
0.65
0.1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
27.9 kW
5.01 kW
0.00 kW
32.94 kW-Condensing side only
16.5% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
NA
NA
t Measurment
10
74
56
40
85
89%
70%
30
81
30.20
NA N
NA N
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
A NA
A NA
CU Capacity Estimates
NA F
NA F
NA in
NA in
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
NA kW/Ton
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Center Ground Unit
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38AD028610
A494368
Split System
1994
YTC Student Center
Ground Unit
54.4 Amps
460 Volts
0.65
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
3 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
24.2
10
1%
8.2
1.46
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
27.9 kW
5.01 kW
0.00 kW
32.94 kW - Condensing side only
1.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
3-Phase
1.73
3
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.95
0.05
0.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
NA
NA
t Measurment
10
74
54
40
85
101%
91%
30
84
11.60
NA N
NA N
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
A NA
A NA
CU Capacity Estimates
NA F
NA F
NA in
NA in
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
NA kW/Ton
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Center Ground Unit
-------
YTC Student Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
Ground Unit
Summary
8.8 BTU/W-h
NA CFM (Measured)
24.17 tons
30.00 tons
NA sq-ft
7.19 pre 8.23 post
Equipment age
10 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
81
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
84
ST-SH
26
30
El
89%
101%
Cl
70%
91%
EER
7.9
9.0
kW
24.33
9.35
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
NA
NA
exhaust
NA
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
NA
NA
kW
NA
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
NA
tons
NA
NA
EER
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
24.33
14.40
7.9
9.35
19.83
9.0
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
27.92
20.57
8.84
29.49
21.79
8.87
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
87%
70%
89%
32%
91%
1 01 %
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
109%
120%
90%
109%
120%
103%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
26.4
14.1
7.1
9.6
18.4
8.1
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
30.25
20.18
8.01
30.25
20.18
8.01
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
87%
70%
89%
32%
91%
1 01 %
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
101%
-
89%
Predicted/CU
NA
-
NA
Predicted/
Original
90%
-
103%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
7.9
9.0
7.8
8.9
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
13.5% NA
Spreadsheet
7.19
8.23
7.19
8.23
14.5%
Weighted Average 404.5%
434.8%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Student Center Ground Unit
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Trane
YCH210B4
F1 4627920
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Library
Unit 2
14.5
460
0.74
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
3.00 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
10.2
10.2
17.29
13
3%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.60
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
0.95
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.2
1
1
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
17.1 kW
3.34 kW
2.45 kW
20.42 kW - Condensing side only
3.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
2.7
5.1
4.9
3.1
2.7
3.3
3.6
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
484
485
t Measurement
10
73
53
50
85
Circuit 1 (only)
91%
94%
10
77
12.40
22.2 1C
17.6 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
77 F
92 F
91 in
48 in
30.3 sq-ft
6613
3.74 kg/sec
8.93 Tons
7.54 EER
.7 1.0
5 0.41
298 K
306 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Library Unit 2
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Trane
YCH210B4
F1 4627920
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Library
Unit 2
14.5
460
0.74
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
3 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
10.2
10.2
17.29
13
0%
9.3
1.29
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.6
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
17.1 kW
3.34 kW
2.45 kW
20.42 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
1.2
6.1
6.4
5.2
4.73
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
481
483
t Measurement
10
73
53
50
85
Circuit 1 (only)
84%
96%
10
88
13.40
21 1C
18.9 4
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
88 F
112 F
91 in
48 in
30.3 sq-ft
8600
4.87 kg/sec
18.57 Tons
15.59 EER
.1 1.0
2 0.45
304 K
318 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Library Unit 2
-------
YTC - Library
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
Unit 2 Summary
10.2 BTU/W-h
6613 CFM (Measured)
17.29 tons
10.00 tons
30.33 sq-ft
9.08 pre 9.32 post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
77
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
88
EWB
61
61
El
91%
84%
Cl
94%
96%
EER
11.6
8.8
kW
10.72
11.58
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
77
88
exhaust
92
112
Cond Air
AT(K)
8.3
13.3
kW
14.2
14.3
(kg/sec)
3.74
4.87
tons
8.93
18.57
EER
7.54
15.59
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
10.72
8.27
11.6
11.58
7.86
8.8
CU
14.2
8.93
7.54
14.3
18.57
15.59
Lit
8.27
8.80
12.77
9.40
8.19
10.45
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
130%
94%
91%
123%
96%
84%
CU/Lit
172%
101%
59%
152%
227%
149%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
89%
100%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
13.2
8.1
9.2
12.6
8.3
8.5
CU
17.5
8.8
6.0
15.5
19.6
15.1
Literature
10.21
8.64
10.16
10.21
8.64
10.16
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
130%
94%
91%
123%
96%
84%
CU/Lit
172%
101%
59%
152%
227%
1 49%
SA/CU
75%
93%
154%
81%
42%
56%
Predicted/SA
98%
-
1 06%
Predicted/CU
151%
-
60%
Predicted/
Original
89%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.6
8.8
9.2
8.5
-7.7%
Condenser Test
7.54
15.59
6.00
15.15
152.3%
Spreadsheet
9.08
9.32
9.08
9.32
2.7%
Weighted Average -76.9%
1523.3%
27.1%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Library Unit 2
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCH210B4
F14627920
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Library
Unitl
14.5 Amps
460 Volts
0.74
3.00 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
10.2
10.2
17.29
13
1.36
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.60
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
1
0.9
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.5
1
1
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
17.1 kW
3.34 kW
2.45 kW
20.42 kW-Condensing side only
6.2% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Average
ft/sec
5.9
6.1
4.5
3.9
2.3
3.4
2.7
4.1
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
484
485
t Measurement
10
73
53
50
85
Circuit 1 (only)
84%
90%
10
75
12.70
22.2 1C
17.6 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
75 F
92 F
91 in
48 in
30.3 sq-ft
7488
4.24 kg/sec
11.46 Tons
9.68 EER
.7 1.0
5 0.41
297 K
306 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Library Unit 1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Trane
YCH210B4
F1 4627920
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Library
Unitl
14.5
460
0.74
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
3 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
10.2
10.2
17.29
13
0%
9.3
1.29
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.6
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
17.1 kW
3.34 kW
2.45 kW
20.42 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
12.7
12.9
11.4
11.5
12.13
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
480
484
t Measurement
10
73
53
50
85
Circuit 1 (only)
93%
85%
10
85
11.10
20.2 9
14.8 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
86 F
95 F
91 in
48 in
30.3 sq-ft
22068
12.50 kg/sec
16.88 Tons
17.17 EER
6 0.99
2 0.30
303 K
308 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Library Unit 1
-------
YTC - Library
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
Unit 1 Summary
10.2 BTU/W-h
7488 CFM (Measured)
17.29 tons
10.00 tons
30.33 sq-ft
8.82 pre 9.32 post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
75
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
85
EWB
61
61
El
84%
93%
Cl
90%
85%
EER
11.1
10.3
kW
10.98
9.60
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
75
86
exhaust
92
94.5
Cond Air
AT(K)
9.4
4.7
kW
14.2
11.8
(kg/sec)
4.24
12.50
tons
11.46
16.88
EER
9.68
17.17
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
10.98
8.02
11.1
9.60
7.10
10.3
cu
14.2
11.46
9.68
11.8
16.88
17.17
Lit
8.06
8.91
13.26
9.09
8.35
11.03
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
136%
90%
84%
106%
85%
93%
CU/Lit
176%
129%
73%
130%
202%
156%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
87%
100%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
13.9
7.8
8.5
10.8
7.3
9.4
CU
18.0
11.1
7.4
13.3
17.5
15.8
Literature
10.21
8.64
10.16
10.21
8.64
10.16
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
136%
90%
84%
106%
85%
93%
CU/Lit
176%
129%
73%
130%
202%
1 56%
SA/CU
77%
70%
115%
81%
42%
60%
Predicted/SA
103%
-
93%
Predicted/CU
119%
-
56%
Predicted/
Original
87%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.1
10.3
8.5
9.4
10.7%
Condenser Test
9.68
17.17
7.42
15.81
113.2%
Spreadsheet
8.82
9.32
8.82
9.32
5.7%
Weighted Average 107.1 %
1131.7%
56.9%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
Library Unit 1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
American Standard
TWA060A400A2
G06289343
Split-System
1992
YTC Hood Center
HP-2
9.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.77
0.90 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.6 kW
0.29 kW
0.00 kW
5.87 kW-Condensing side only
9.9
9.9
4.82
12
5%
8.8
1.37
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New '
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
NA Brush Colls
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP 1
10
77
55
43
85
71%
44%
5
77
4.20
F
F
%
%
Tons
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
F - K
F - K
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
HP-2
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
American Standard
TWA060A400A2
G06289343
Split-System
1992
YTC Hood Center
HP-2
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
9.9
9.9
4.82
12
0%
9.2
1.31
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
9.1 Amps Power supply:
460.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.8 Compressor quantity:
0.9 Amps Power supply:
460.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.6 kW
0.29 kW
0.00 kW
5.87 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP1
10
72
52
50
85
83%
79%
5
74
5.80
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
F - K
F - K
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
HP-2
-------
YTC Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
HP-2 Summary
9.9 BTU/W-h Equipment age
NA CFM (Measured)
4.82
5.00 tons
NA sq-ft
8.76 pre 9.16 post
12 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
77
EWB
62
El
71%
Cl
44%
EER
8.5
kW
4.05
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
NA
exhaust
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
NA
kW
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
tons
NA
EER
NA
Post Adsil Measurements
74
62
83%
79%
10.4
5.59
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
4.05
2.14
8.5
5.59
3.91
10.4
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
4.88
4.87
11.98
4.75
4.95
12.49
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
83%
44%
71%
118%
79%
83%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
101%
100%
89%
101%
100%
93%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
4.8
2.1
7.0
6.9
3.8
8.2
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
5.84
4.82
9.90
5.84
4.82
9.90
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
83%
44%
71%
118%
79%
83%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
125%
107%
Predicted/CU
Predicted/
Original
88%
93%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
8.5
10.4
7.0
8.2
16.9%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
8.76
9.16
8.76
9.16
4.6%
Weighted Average
84.5%
NA
23.1%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
HP-2
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC036
3200E19247
Split System cool
2000
YTC Hood Center
HP-1
11.1 Amps
230 Volts
0.77
1.40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.23 kW
0.11 kW
3.63 kW-Condensing side only
9.4
9.4
2.84
4
5%
8.9
1.34
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New '
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
5.0% Performance Degradation
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
202
205
t Measurment
COMP 1
10
72
55
50
85
105%
99%
3
79
3.50
9.4 1.92 1
8.23 0.75 0.43
F
F
%
%
Tons
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
79 F 299 K
87 F 304 K
90 in
23 in
14.4sq-ft
5,348
3.03 kg/sec
3.85 Tons
17.30 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
HP-1
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
38YCC036
3200E19247
Split System cool
2000
YTC Hood Center
HP-1
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
9.4
9.4
2.8
4
0%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
11.1 Amps Power supply:
230.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.77 Compressor quantity:
1.4 Amps Power supply:
230.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
3-Phase
1.7
1.0
1-Phase
1.0
1.0
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.23 kW
0.11 kW
3.63 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.2
6.4
7.6
7.0
6.8
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
205
203
t Measurment
COMP1
10
72
52
50
85
115%
117%
3
82
3.60
7.8 0.
9.2 1.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
76 F
87 F
90 in
23 in
14.4 sq-ft
5865
3.32 kg/sec
5.81 Tons
27.43 EER
58 0.44
36 1.00
298 K
304 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
HP-1
-------
YTC Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
HP-1 Summary
9.4 BTU/W-h
5,348 CFM (Measured)
2.84 tons
3.00 tons
14.38 sq-ft
8.93 pre 9.37 post
Equipment age
4 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
79
EWB
60
El
105%
Cl
99%
EER
11.0
kW
3.32
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
79
deg F
exhaust
87
Cond Air
AT(K)
4.4
kW
2.67
(kg/sec)
3.03
tons
3.85
EER
17.30
Post Adsil Measurements
13-Jun
82
60
115%
117%
11.7
3.41
76
87
6.1
2.54
3.32
5.81
27.43
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
3.32
2.76
11.0
3.41
3.22
11.7
CU
2.67
3.85
17.30
2.54
5.81
27.43
Lit
3.19
2.79
10.48
3.25
2.75
10.15
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
104%
99%
105%
105%
1 1 7%
1 1 5%
CU/Lit
84%
138%
165%
78%
211%
270%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
95%
100%
1 00%
1 00%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
3.8
2.8
9.8
3.8
3.3
10.8
CU
3.0
3.9
15.5
2.8
6.0
25.3
Literature
3.64
2.84
9.37
3.64
2.84
9.37
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
104%
99%
105%
105%
1 1 7%
1 1 5%
CU/Lit
84%
138%
165%
78%
21 1 %
270%
SA/CU
124%
72%
64%
134%
55%
43%
Predicted/SA
91%
-
83%
Predicted/CU
58%
-
35%
Predicted/
Original
95%
-
100%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.0
11.7
9.8
10.8
9.5%
Condenser Test
17.30
27.43
15.47
25.34
63.8%
Spreadsheet
8.93
9.37
8.93
9.37
5.0%
Weighted Average 28.6%
191.3%
15.0%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
HP-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCH300B4
G071427640
RTU-Gas
1992
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-9
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
10.3
10.3
22.67
12
4%
9.2
1.30
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
17.7 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.87 Compressor quantity:
3.00 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 11.00 Amps
Nameplate Voltage: 460 Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
24.5 kW
1.93 kW
3.54 kW
26.44 kW - Condensing side only
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
3.7% Performance Degradation
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
3.9
2.9
10.2
10.2
2.7
3.3
5.5
0.9
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.5
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Volts
486
485
t Measurement
10
70
50
50
85
Circuit 1
88%
90%
12.5
76
15.30
Amps kW PF
40.4 1£
37.6 8
F
F
%
%
Circ
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
73 F
108. 5 F
109 in
48 in
36.3 sq-ft
12063
6.83 kg/sec
38.54 Tons
16.40 EER
.6 1
6 0.47
uit2
91%
91%
12.5 Tons
76 F
5.10 kW
296 K
316 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-9
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCH300B4
G071 427640
RTU-Gas
1992
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-9
17.7 Amps
460 Volts
0.87
3 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 11
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
24.5 kW
1 .93 kW
3.54 kW
26.44 kW- Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
10.3
10.3
22.67
12
0%
9.5
1.26
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Average
Ft/Sec
16.0
6.8
15.8
13.9
12.2
15.6
17.0
13.1
13.8
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
483
484
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
Circuit 1
102%
103%
12.5
90
15.20
38.2 1E
16.3 8
F
F
%
%
Circ
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
85 F
105 F
109 in
48 n
36.3 sq-ft
30084
17.04 kg/sec
54. 15 Tons
24.25 EER
.5 1
3 0.48
uit2
00%
00%
12.5 Tons
88 F
14.90 kW
303 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-9
-------
YTC - Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-9 Summary
10.3 BTU/W-h
12063 CFM (Measured)
22.67 tons
25.00 tons
36.33 sq-ft
9.21 pre 9.53 post
Equipment age
12 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
76
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
90
EWB
60
60
El
90%
101%
Cl
91%
91%
EER
11.4
10.2
kW
27.56
27.29
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
73
85
exhaust
108.5
105
Cond Air
AT(K)
19.7
11.1
kW
28.2
26.8
(kg/sec)
6.83
17.04
tons
38.54
54.15
EER
16.40
24.25
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
27.56
21.63
11.4
27.29
19.98
10.2
CU
28.2
38.54
16.40
26.8
54.15
24.25
Lit
22.42
23.90
12.79
26.35
22.08
10.05
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
123%
91%
90%
1 04%
91%
1 01 %
CU/Lit
126%
161%
128%
102%
245%
241 %
SS/Lit
94%
95%
90%
94%
95%
93%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
34.5
21.7
9.2
29.0
21.7
10.4
CU
35.3
38.7
13.2
28.5
58.8
24.7
Literature
28.05
23.98
10.26
28.05
23.98
10.26
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
123%
91%
90%
104%
91%
101%
CU/Lit
126%
161%
128%
102%
245%
241 %
SA/CU
98%
56%
70%
102%
37%
42%
Predicted/SA
100%
-
89%
Predicted/CU
70%
-
37%
Predicted/
Original
90%
-
93%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.4
10.2
9.2
10.4
12.8%
Condenser Test
16.40
24.25
13.15
24.74
88.1%
Spreadsheet
9.21
9.53
9.21
9.53
3.4%
Weighted Average 321.2%
2203.0%
85.6%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-9
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCH300B4
G071427640
RTU-Gas
1992
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-5
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
9.6
9.6
23.98
12
0%
8.8
1.36
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
17.7 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.95 Compressor quantity:
3.00 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 11.00 Amps
Nameplate Voltage: 460 Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
26.8 kW
3.34 kW
3.54 kW
30.11 kW-Condensing side only
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
0.0% Performance Degradation
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
15.2
14.5
12.7
12.5
15.4
11.7
13.667
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
488
488
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
Circuit 1 (only)
1 00%
98%
15
80
17.80
22.7 1
18.9 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
80 F
91 F
109 in
48 in
36.3 sq-ft
29793
16.87 kg/sec
29.49 Tons
23.75 EER
1 1
9 0.42
300 K
306 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-5
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCH300B4
G071 427640
RTU-Gas
1992
YTC- Hood Center
RTU-5
17.7
460
0.95
3
460
0.7
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 11
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kWrton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
26.8 kW
3.34 kW
3.54 kW
30.11 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
9.6
9.6
23.98
12
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Average
ft/sec
15.4
12.7
14.6
13.9
12.9
11.1
15.2
10.7
13.31
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
488
488
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
Circuit 1 (only)
101%
103%
15
77
18.30
23.4 11.1 0.99
19.1 3.7 0.40
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
78 F 299 K
87 F 304 K
109 in
48 n
36.3 sq-ft
29021
16.44 kg/sec
23.51 Tons
19.06 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-5
-------
YTC - Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-5 Summary
9.6 BTU/W-h
29793 CFM (Measured)
23.98 tons
15.00 tons
36.33 sq-ft
8.85 pre 8.85 post
Equipment age
12 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
80
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
77
EWB
60
60
El
100%
101%
Cl
98%
103%
EER
10.8
11.5
kW
14.23
14.63
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
80
78
exhaust
91
87
Cond Air
AT(K)
6.1
5.0
kW
14.9
14.8
(kg/sec)
16.87
16.44
tons
29.49
23.51
EER
23.75
19.06
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
14.23
11.46
10.8
14.63
12.24
11.5
CU
14.9
29.49
23.75
14.8
23.51
19.06
Lit
12.97
11.69
10.82
12.50
11.88
11.41
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
110%
98%
100%
117%
103%
1 01 %
CU/Lit
115%
252%
220%
118%
198%
167%
SS/Lit
101%
100%
92%
101%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
16.4
11.7
9.6
17.5
12.3
9.7
CU
17.2
30.2
21.1
17.7
23.7
16.1
Literature
14.95
11.99
9.62
14.95
11.99
9.62
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
110%
98%
100%
117%
103%
101%
CU/Lit
115%
252%
220%
118%
198%
1 67%
SA/CU
95%
39%
46%
99%
52%
60%
Predicted/SA
92%
-
91%
Predicted/CU
42%
-
55%
Predicted/
Original
92%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
10.8
11.5
9.6
9.7
1 .0%
Condenser Test
23.75
19.06
21.13
16.08
-23.9%
Spreadsheet
8.85
8.85
8.85
8.85
0.0%
Weighted Average 15.0%
-358.7%
0.0%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-5
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
SFHD030
J97M72722
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-6
27.3 Amps
460 Volts
0.75
1.80
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 10.80
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
32.6 kW
3.01 kW
3.48 kW
35.60 kW-Condensing side only
12.7% Performance Degradation
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
9.7 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
9.7 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
28.74 tons
13 years
13% (% degraded)
8.0 Btu/W-hr
1.51
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
3
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.05
0.75
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
NA
NA
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
Circuit 1
103%
98%
30
84
34.50
NA N
NA N
F
F
%
%
A NA
A NA
Two comp. on one circuit
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
NA F NA K
NA F NA K
NA in
NA in
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical Center
RTU-6
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
SFHD030
J97M72722
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-6
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
9.7
9.7
28.74
13
0%
8.9
1.35
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
27.3 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.75 Compressor quantity:
1.8 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 10.8
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
32.6 kW
3.01 kW
3.48 kW
35.60 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
3
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurement
10
70
50
65
85
Circuit 1 (only)
102%
99%
30
78
35.00
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
NA F NA K
NA F NA K
NA in
NA in
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical Center
RTU-6
-------
YTC - Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-6 Summary
9.7 BTU/W-h
NA CFM (Measured)
28.74 tons
30.00 tons
NA sq-ft
7.96 pre 8.89 post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
84
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
78
EWB
60
59
El
103%
102%
Cl
98%
99%
EER
11.1
11.9
kW
33.05
33.53
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
NA
NA
exhaust
NA
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
NA
NA
kW
NA
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
NA
tons
NA
NA
EER
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
33.05
26.31
11.1
33.53
26.72
11.9
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
30.00
26.85
10.74
27.66
26.99
11.71
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
110%
98%
103%
121%
99%
102%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
100%
100%
82%
100%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
39.2
28.2
10.0
43.1
28.5
9.9
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
35.57
28.74
9.70
35.57
28.74
9.70
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
110%
98%
103%
121%
99%
102%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
80%
-
81%
Predicted/CU
NA
-
NA
Predicted/
Original
82%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.1
11.9
10.0
9.9
-1.0%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
7.96
8.89
7.96
8.89
11.7%
Weighted Average -29.1%
NA
349.5%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical Center
RTU-6
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
SFHCC25
J91M72724
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-7
27.3 Amps
460 Volts
0.62
1.80
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.30
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
26.9 kW
3.01 kW
2.35 kW
29.95 kW-Condensing side only
11.5% Performance Degradation
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
9.7 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
9.7 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
24.30 tons
13 years
11% (% degraded)
8.1 Btu/W-hr
1.48
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
3
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.5
0.5
0.75
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
NA
NA
t Measurement
10
70
50
55
85
Circuit 1
79%
82%
25
70
30.80
NA N
NA N
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
A NA
A NA
CU Capacity Estimates
NA F NA K
NA F NA K
NA in
NA in
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-7
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
SFHCC25
J91M72724
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-7
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
9.7
9.7
24.30
13
0%
8.9
1.34
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
27.3 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.62 Compressor quantity:
1.8 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.3
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
26.9 kW
3.01 kW
2.35 kW
29.95 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
3
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurement
10
70
50
65
85
Circuit 1 (only)
109%
1 08%
25
85
29.60
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
NA F NA K
NA F NA K
NA in
NA in
NA sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-7
-------
YTC - Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-7 Summary
9.7 BTU/W-h
NA CFM (Measured)
24.30 tons
25.00 tons
NA sq-ft
8.08 pre 8.93 post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
70
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
85
EWB
60
62
El
79%
109%
Cl
82%
108%
EER
10.2
11.4
kW
29.94
28.77
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
NA
NA
exhaust
NA
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
NA
NA
kW
NA
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
NA
tons
NA
NA
EER
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
29.94
19.54
10.2
28.77
25.21
11.4
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
22.25
23.83
12.85
26.83
23.34
10.44
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
135%
82%
79%
107%
108%
109%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
99%
100%
83%
99%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
40.5
19.9
7.7
32.3
26.2
10.6
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
30.11
24.30
9.69
30.11
24.30
9.69
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
135%
82%
79%
107%
108%
109%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
106%
-
77%
Predicted/CU
NA
-
NA
Predicted/
Original
83%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
10.2
11.4
7.7
10.6
38.0%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
8.08
8.93
8.08
8.93
10.5%
Weighted Average 949.4%
NA
262.6%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-7
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
SFHCC20
J91 M72723
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-8
18.2
460
0.72
1.80
460
0.70
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.30
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition _
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Published EER:* 9.7 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Calculated EER: 9.7 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Nominal Capacity: 18.41 tons
Age 13 years
Coil Conditon 15% (% degraded)
Present Condition EER 7.8 Btu/W-hr
kW/ton 1.54
Power supply: 3-phase
Phase adjustment: 1.73
Compressor quantity: 2
Power supply: 3-Phase
Phase adjustment: 1.73
Fan quantity: 2
Power supply: 3-Phase
Phase adjustment: 1.73
Fan quantity: 1
20.9 kW
2.01 kW
2.35 kW
22.86 kW-Condensing side only
14.8% Performance Degradation
Amps
Volts
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
0.25
0.75
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
12.3
10.9
10.9
12.1
10.9
9.6
11.1
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
490
490
t Measurement
10
70
50
60
85
Circuit 1
120%
116%
10
76
11.80
20.7 9
19.1 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
76 F
89 F
63 in
71 n
31.1 sq-ft
20719
11.73 kg/sec
24.24 Tons
24.24 EER
7 0.96
3 0.25
298 K
305 K
Note: * Published EER value from 25-ton Trane model YCH300B4. ARI efficiency data not available for this unit
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-8
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
SFHCC20
J91 M72723
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC - Hood Center
RTU-8
18.2
460
0.72
1.8
460
0.7
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.3
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
20.9 kW
2.01 kW
2.35 kW
22.86 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
9.7
9.7
18.41
13
1.35
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
Ft/Sec
12.3
12.5
12.5
12.3
12.9
13.1
12.6
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
488
488
t Measurement
10
70
50
65
85
Circuit 1 (only)
128%
129%
10
78
12.10
23.4 11
19.1 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
79 F
91 F
63 in
71 in
31.1 sq-ft
23483
13.30 kg/sec
25.36 Tons
20.56 EER
.1 0.99
7 0.40
299 K
306 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-8
-------
YTC - Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-8 Summary
9.7 BTU/W-h
20719 CFM (Measured)
18.41 tons
10.00 tons
31.06 sq-ft
7.81 pre 8.86 post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
76
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
78
EWB
61
62
El
120%
128%
Cl
116%
129%
EER
14.3
15.0
kW
10.86
11.14
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
76
79
exhaust
89
91
Cond Air
AT(K)
7.2
6.7
kW
12
14.8
(kg/sec)
11.73
13.30
tons
24.24
25.36
EER
24.24
20.56
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
10.86
10.47
14.3
11.14
11.75
15.0
CU
12
24.24
24.24
14.8
25.36
20.56
Lit
9.11
9.03
11.89
9.35
9.11
11.70
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
119%
116%
120%
119%
129%
128%
CU/Lit
132%
269%
204%
158%
278%
176%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
81%
100%
100%
91%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
13.6
10.7
11.6
13.6
11.9
12.4
CU
15.0
24.7
19.8
18.0
25.6
17.0
Literature
11.39
9.20
9.69
11.39
9.20
9.69
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
119%
116%
120%
119%
129%
128%
CU/Lit
132%
269%
204%
158%
278%
1 76%
SA/CU
91%
43%
59%
75%
46%
73%
Predicted/SA
67%
-
63%
Predicted/CU
40%
-
46%
Predicted/
Original
81%
-
91%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
14.3
15.0
11.6
12.4
6.7%
Condenser Test
24.24
20.56
19.76
17.04
-13.7%
Spreadsheet
7.81
8.86
7.81
8.86
13.5%
Weighted Average 66.7%
-137.5%
135.3%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-8
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCH240B4
F501 422580
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC- Hood Center
RTU-10
17.4
460
0.96
3.00
460
0.70
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 11.00 Amps
Nameplate Voltage: 460 Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition _
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
26.6 kW
3.34 kW
3.54 kW
29.93 kW-Condensing side only
3.0% Performance Degradation
23.98
13
3%
8.6
1.40
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Average
ft/sec
4.1
5.7
5.9
3.1
5.5
3.7
4.7
4.9
4.7
0.85
0.15
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
480
480
t Measurement
10
72
52
55
85
Circuit 1 (only)
66%
74%
10
77
13.20
38.8 9
40.6 1£
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
77 F
115 F
99 in
48 n
33.0 sq-ft
9306
5.27 kg/sec
31. 82 Tons
13.17 EER
4 0.51
.6 1.00
298 K
319 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-10
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCH240B4
F501 422580
RTU-Gas
1991
YTC- Hood Center
RTU-10
17.4
460
0.96
3
460
0.7
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 11
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kWrton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
26.6 kW
3.34 kW
3.54 kW
29.93 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
9.6
9.6
23.98
13
3-phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Average
Ft/Sec
15.2
12.5
15.2
14.8
14.6
12.5
13.3
12.3
13.80
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
485
483
t Measurement
Circuit 1 (only)
34.7 16.7 0.99
32.3 7.35 0.47
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
78 F 299 K
87 F 304 K
99 in
48 n
33.0 sq-ft
27324
15.47 kg/sec
22. 13 Tons
11.04 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-10
-------
YTC- Hood Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-10 Summary
9.6 BTU/W-h
9306 CFM (Measured)
23.98 tons
10.00 tons
33.00 sq-ft
8.59 pre 8.82 post
Equipment age
13 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
77
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
NA
EWB
60
El
66%
Cl
74%
EER
7.1
Could not douplicate pre-test conditions
NA
NA
NA
NA
kW
15.83
NA
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
77
78
exhaust
115
87
Cond Air
AT(K)
21.1
5.0
kW
29
24.05
(kg/sec)
5.27
15.47
tons
31.82
22.13
EER
13.17
11.04
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
15.83
8.65
7.1
NA
NA
NA
CU
29
31.82
13.17
24.05
22.13
11.04
Lit
12.97
11.69
10.82
12.50
11.88
11.41
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
122%
74%
66%
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
224%
272%
122%
192%
186%
97%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
89%
100%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
36.5
17.7
6.4
NA
NA
NA
CU
66.9
65.3
11.7
57.5
44.7
9.3
Literature
29.90
23.98
9.62
29.90
23.98
9.62
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
122%
74%
66%
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
224%
272%
122%
192%
186%
97%
SA/CU
55%
27%
54%
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
135%
-
NA
Predicted/CU
73%
-
92%
Predicted/
Original
89%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
7.1
NA
6.4
NA
NA
Condenser Test
13.17
11.04
11.72
9.32
-20.5%
Spreadsheet
8.59
8.82
8.59
8.82
2.7%
Weighted Average
NA
-204.8%
27.1%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-10
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
NA
558CPX048000
NA
RTU-Gas
2000
YTC Bid D
RTU-1
15.7 Ar
208 Vc
0.85
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps: 1.90
Nameplate Voltage: 208
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
4.8 kW
0.28 kW
0.00 kW
5.08 kW-Condensing side only
21.4% Performance Degradation
NA
9.5
4.00
4
21%
7.8
1.54
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
0.8
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
Average
ft/sec
-
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
206
203
t Measurment
10
75%
83%
4
88
5.10
17.1 3
18.7 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
5 0.98
1 0.56
CU Capacity Estimates
88 F
101 F
72 in
37 in
18.5sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NA EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
NA
558CPX048000
NA
RTU-Gas
2000
YTC Bid D
RTU-1
15.7
208
0.85
Ar
Vc
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.9
208
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
4.8 kW
0.28 kW
0.00 kW
5.08 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
NA
9.5
4.00
4
0%
9.5
1.27
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
Average
ft/sec
NA
NA
NA
NA
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
NA
NA
t Measurment
10
NA
NA
NA
NA
101%
90%
4
85
4.30
NA N
NA N
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
A NA
A NA
CU Capacity Estimates
NAF
NAF
72 in
37 in
18.5sq-ft
NA
NA kg/sec
NA Tons
NAEER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-1
-------
YTC Bid D RTU-1 Summary
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM NA
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
9.5 BTU/W-h
CFM (Measured)
4.00 tons
4.00 tons
18.50 sq-ft
7.79 pre 9.45 post
Equipment age
4 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
88
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
85
EWB
61
61
El
75%
101%
Cl
83%
90%
EER
7.1
9.5
kW
5.10
4.30
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
88
NA
deg F
exhaust
101
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
7.2
NA
kW
5.6
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
NA
tons
NA
NA
EER
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
5.10
NA
7.1
4.30
NA
9.5
CU
5.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
NA
NA
Predicted/CU
NA
NA
Predicted/
Original
NA
NA
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
7.1
9.5
7.1
9.5
34.7%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
7.79
9.45
7.79
9.45
21.4%
Weighted Average 138.7%
NA
85.6%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
York Technical College
RTU-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCS060A4EMAOXD
236101276L
RTU-Gas
2002
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-16
9.5 Amps
460 Volts
0.86
1.20 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.20
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kWrton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.5 kW
0.39 kW
1.03 kW
6.89 kW - Condensing side only
0.1% Performance Degradation
9.1
9.1
5.21
2
0%
9.3
1.30
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
10.7
10.9
10.8
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
480
480
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
89%
89%
5
96
6.00
11.8 5.6 0.99
8.6 1.5 0.37
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
92 F 306 K
114 F 319 K
47 in
28 n
9.1 sq-ft
5922
3.35 kg/sec
11. 72 Tons
19.82 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-16
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCS060A4EMAOXD
236101276L
RTU-Gas
2002
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-16
9.5 Amps
460 Volts
1.2
460
0.7
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.2
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.5 kW
0.39 kW
1.03 kW
6.89 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
9.1
9.1
5.21
2
0%
9.3
1.30
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
Average
Ft/Sec
10.7
11.1
12.7
11.5
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
487
485
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
94%
90%
5
80
5.80
10.5 4
7.2 0.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
78 F
100 F
47 in
28 in
9.1 sq-ft
6306
3.57 kg/sec
12. 48 Tons
25.74 EER
9 0.96
92 0.26
299 K
311 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-16
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-16 Summary
9.1 BTU/W-h
5922 CFM (Measured)
5.21 tons
5.00 tons
9.14 sq-ft
9.25 pre 9.26 post
Equipment age
2 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
96
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
80
EWB
60
60
El
89%
94%
Cl
89%
90%
EER
7.3
10.1
kW
6.25
6.04
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
92
78
exhaust
114
100
Cond Air
AT(K)
12.2
12.2
kW
7.1
5.82
(kg/sec)
3.35
3.57
tons
11.72
12.48
EER
19.82
25.74
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
6.25
4.21
7.3
6.04
4.68
10.1
CU
7.1
11.72
19.82
5.82
12.48
25.74
Lit
6.86
4.73
8.19
5.76
5.20
10.70
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
91%
89%
89%
105%
90%
94%
CU/Lit
1 04%
248%
242%
101%
240%
241 %
SS/Lit
100%
100%
101%
100%
100%
102%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
6.3
4.6
8.1
7.2
4.7
8.6
CU
7.1
12.9
22.1
6.9
12.5
21.9
Literature
6.86
5.21
9.11
6.86
5.21
9.11
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
91%
89%
89%
105%
90%
94%
CU/Lit
104%
248%
242%
101%
240%
241 %
SA/CU
88%
36%
37%
104%
37%
39%
Predicted/SA
114%
-
108%
Predicted/CU
42%
-
42%
Predicted/
Original
101%
-
102%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
7.3
10.1
8.1
8.6
5.6%
Condenser Test
19.82
25.74
22.06
21.93
-0.6%
Spreadsheet
9.25
9.26
9.25
9.26
0.1%
Weighted Average 28.1%
-3.0%
0.5%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-16
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCS090A4ELAO
236101222L
RTU-Gas
2002
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-15
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
13.6 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.75 Compressor quantity:
2.50 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
8.1 kW
0.81 kW
0.00 kW
8.92 kW-Condensing side only
0.1% Performance Degradation
10.0 Btu/W-hr (CUOnly)
10.0 Btu/W-hr (CUOnly)
7.44 tons
2 years
0% (% degraded)
10.2 Btu/W-hr
1.18
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
7.6
10.7
9.2
0.02
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
488
488
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
105%
103%
7.5
94
8.80
15.9 1.9 0.25
13.8 6.6 0.99
F
F
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
92 F 306 K
112 F 318 K
70 in
36 in
17.5 sq-ft
9608
5.44 kg/sec
17.29 Tons
24.41 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-15
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Trane
YCS090A4ELAO
236101222L
RTU-Gas
2002
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-15
13.6 Amps
460 Volts
0.75
2.5 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
8.1 kW
0.81 kW
0.00 kW
8.92 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
Amps
Volts
10.0 Btu/W-hr (CUOnly)
10.0 Btu/W-hr (CUOnly)
7.44 tons
2 years
0% (% degraded)
10.2 Btu/W-hr
1.18
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
Average
ft/sec
8.2
8.6
12.3
9.7
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
487
484
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
109%
104%
7.5
79
8.70
11.6 5
13.1 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
77 F
96 F
70 in
36 in
17.5sq-ft
10185
5.77 kg/sec
17.42 Tons
27.86 EER
2 0.93
3 0.36
298 K
309 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-15
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-15 Summary
10.0 BTU/W-h
9608 CFM (Measured)
7.44 tons
7.50 tons
17.50 sq-ft
10.19 pre 10.21 post
Equipment age
2 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
94
Post Adsil Measurements
14-Jun
79
EWB
60
60
El
105%
109%
Cl
103%
1 04%
EER
9.6
12.9
kW
8.72
8.63
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
92
77
exhaust
112
96
Cond Air
AT(K)
11.1
10.6
kW
8.5
7.5
(kg/sec)
5.44
5.77
tons
17.29
17.42
EER
24.41
27.86
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
8.72
6.98
9.6
8.63
7.69
12.9
CU
8.5
17.29
24.41
7.5
17.42
27.86
Lit
8.73
6.78
9.19
7.39
7.40
11.87
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
100%
103%
105%
117%
1 04%
109%
CU/Lit
97%
255%
266%
101%
235%
235%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
102%
100%
100%
102%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
8.9
7.7
10.5
10.4
7.7
10.9
CU
8.7
19.0
26.6
9.0
17.5
23.5
Literature
8.91
7.44
10.02
8.91
7.44
10.02
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
100%
103%
105%
117%
104%
109%
CU/Lit
97%
255%
266%
101%
235%
235%
SA/CU
103%
40%
40%
115%
44%
46%
Predicted/SA
97%
-
93%
Predicted/CU
38%
-
43%
Predicted/
Original
102%
-
102%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
9.6
12.9
10.5
10.9
3.8%
Condenser Test
24.41
27.86
26.63
23.52
-11.6%
Spreadsheet
10.19
10.21
10.19
10.21
0.1%
Weighted Average 28.6%
-87.3%
0.8%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-15
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D2CG240N24046FDE
SNFHM080298
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-13
9.6 Amps
460 Volts
0.68
2.10 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
X
0.7
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.5
0
0
0
X
X
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
6.1
6.2
4.1
7.6
5.3
4.3
5.6
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
20.8 kW
2.34 kW
0.00 kW
23.12 kW-Condensing side only
4.7% Performance Degradation
10.7
10.7
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
20.71 tons
7
5%
10.0
1.20
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
4
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Coil Number
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
486
484
t Measurement
10
72
52
50
85
85%
94%
20
92
30.00
39.3 19 1
39.6 8.2 0.43
Measured circuit 1
F (compressors 1 &2)
F All compressors were
% running during the
% test.
nput capacty and
power projections
multiplied by 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
92 F 306 K
128.5 F 327 K
74 in
29 in
2
29.8 sq-ft
10015
5.67 kg/sec
32.90 Tons
14.51 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-13
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D2CG240N24046FDE
SNFHM080298
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-13
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
10.7
10.7
20.71
7
0%
10.4
1.15
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
9.6 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.68 Compressor quantity:
2.1
460
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
20.8 kW
2.34 kW
0.00 kW
23.12 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
4
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
11.5
11.7
10.5
10
10.4
9
10.5
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
486 23.3
490 23.4
t Measurement
10
72 F
52 F
50%
85%
1 09%
1 06%
20 Tons
93 F
NAkW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
103 F
74 in
29 in
29.8 sq-ft
18807
10.65 kg/sec
27.08 Tons
21. 52 EER
kW PF
kW PF
3.9 0.37
11.2 0.98
Measured circuit 1
(compressors 1&2)
Compressors 38,4
shut off during
test.
I nput capacity and
power projections
multiplied by 2
304 K
313 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-13
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-13 Summary
10.7 BTU/W-h
10015 CFM (Measured)
20.71 tons
20.00 tons
29.81 sq-ft
9.98 pre 10.44 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
27-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
92
Post Adsil Measurements
17-Jun
93
EWB
60
60
El
85%
109%
Cl
94%
106%
EER
8.5
10.7
kW
31.07
NA
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
92
87
exhaust
128.5
103
Cond Air
AT(K)
20.3
8.9
kW
27.2
15.1
(kg/sec)
5.67
10.65
tons
32.90
27.08
EER
14.51
21.52
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
31.07
17.22
8.5
NA
19.34
10.7
CU
27.2
32.90
14.51
15.1
27.08
21.52
Lit
22.10
18.32
9.95
22.21
18.24
9.86
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
141%
94%
85%
NA
106%
109%
CU/Lit
123%
180%
146%
68%
148%
218%
SS/Lit
99%
100%
94%
99%
100%
98%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
32.7
19.5
9.1
NA
22.0
11.6
CU
28.7
37.2
15.6
15.8
30.7
23.3
Literature
23.29
20.71
10.67
23.29
20.71
10.67
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
141%
94%
85%
NA
106%
109%
CU/Lit
123%
180%
146%
68%
148%
218%
SA/CU
114%
52%
58%
NA
71%
50%
Predicted/SA
110%
-
86%
Predicted/CU
64%
-
43%
Predicted/
Original
94%
-
98%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
8.5
10.7
9.1
11.6
28.2%
Condenser Test
14.51
21.52
15.57
23.30
49.7%
Spreadsheet
9.98
10.44
9.98
10.44
4.6%
Weighted Average 564.7%
993.1%
91.3%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-13
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
York
D3CG090N1304GG
NGFM090088
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-10
7.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.66
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.30
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
0.9
0.1
1
0.9
0.1
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.4 kW
0.84 kW
0.00 kW
8.25 kW - Condensing side only
0.52% Performance Degradation
11.1
11.1
7.63
7
1%
10.7
1.12
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
6.2
5.3
8
11.7
11.5
11.7
9.1
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Volts
484
487
t Measurement
10
74
54
42
85
Circuit 1
90%
99%
3.5
85
4.50
Amps kW PF
16.2 3
14.2 6
F
F
%
%
1 0.4
6 0.94
Circuit 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
84.5 F
105. 5 F
41 in
29 in
16.5sq-ft
8984
5.09 kg/sec
16.98 Tons
21. 00 EER
03%
03%
3.5 Tons
86 F
4.20 kW
302 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-10
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D3CG090N1304GG
NGFM090088
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-10
7.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.656
1.3 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
X
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.4 kW
0.84 kW
0.00 kW
8.25 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
11.1
11.1
7.63
7
0%
10.8
1.11
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
11.1
11.1
9.6
12.5
12.5
12.5
11.6
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
481
485
t Measurement
10
74
54
42
85
Circuit 1
108%
110%
3.5
89
4.30
15.7
14 6.
F
F
%
%
3 0.4
35 0.93
Circuit 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
89 F
106 F
41 in
29 in
16.5 sq-ft
11444
6.48 kg/sec
17.51 Tons
22.47 EER
06%
08%
3.5 Tons
87 F
4.30 kW
305 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-10
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-10 Summary
11.1 BTU/W-h
8984 CFM (Measured)
7.63 tons
7.00 tons
16.51 sq-ft
10.72 pre 10.77 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
13-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
85
Post Adsil Measurements
17-Jun
89
EWB
59
59
El
97%
107%
Cl
101%
109%
EER
11.7
12.1
kW
9.48
9.37
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
84.5
89
exhaust
105.5
106
Cond Air
AT(K)
11.7
9.4
kW
9.7
9.35
(kg/sec)
5.09
6.48
tons
16.98
17.51
EER
21.00
22.47
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
9.48
7.32
11.7
9.37
7.72
12.1
CU
9.7
16.98
21.00
9.35
17.51
22.47
Lit
7.18
7.25
12.11
7.52
7.08
11.31
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
132%
101%
97%
125%
109%
107%
CU/Lit
135%
234%
173%
1 24%
247%
199%
SS/Lit
102%
102%
96%
102%
102%
97%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
10.7
7.6
10.7
10.1
8.2
11.9
CU
10.9
17.5
19.3
10.0
18.5
22.1
Literature
8.08
7.49
11.12
8.08
7.49
11.12
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
132%
101%
97%
125%
109%
107%
CU/Lit
135%
234%
173%
124%
247%
1 99%
SA/CU
98%
43%
56%
100%
44%
54%
Predicted/SA
100%
-
90%
Predicted/CU
56%
-
48%
Predicted/
Original
96%
-
97%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.7
12.1
10.7
11.9
10.9%
Condenser Test
21.00
22.47
19.25
22.05
14.5%
Spreadsheet
10.72
10.77
10.72
10.77
0.5%
Weighted Average 76.2%
3.5%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-10
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D4CG150N20046JSC
NBFM022912
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-9
460
0.78
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.50
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
11.9 kW
1.61 kW
2.42 kW
13.53 kW-Condensing side only
9.2% Performance Degradation
10.5
10.5
11.88
7
9%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Average
ft/sec
4.1
4.1
3.1
3.3
6.6
5.9
6.8
5.9
5.0
0.3
0.7
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
490
487
t Measurment
10
85
65
35
85
Circuit 1
73%
80%
6
88
7.70
26.9 1
27.8 4
F
F
%
%
3 1
6 0.34
Circuit 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
86 F
115 F
48 in
42 n
28.0 sq-ft
11424
6.47 kg/sec
29.81 Tons
20.33 EER
77%
80%
6 Tons
84 F
7.30 kW
303 K
319 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-9
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D4CG150N20046JSC
NBFM022912
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-9
460
0.78
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 7.5
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
11.9 kW
1.61 kW
2.42 kW
13.53 kW-Condensing side only
0.1% Performance Degradation
10.5
10.5
11.88
7
0%
10.2
1.17
Btu/W-hr
Btu/W-hr
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Average
ft/sec
10
9.8
8.4
8.8
9.8
9.2
8.8
6.8
9.0
0.98
0.02
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
482
484
t Measurment
10
87
67
45
85
Circuit 1
85%
78%
6
87
6.70
26.8 4
25.5 1;
F
F
%
%
6 0.35
.4 1.00
Circuit 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
110 F
48 in
42 n
28.0 sq-ft
15036
8.52 kg/sec
31. 12 Tons
21.97 EER
88%
84%
6 Tons
85 F
6.90 kW
304 K
316 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-9
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-9 Summary
10.5 BTU/W-h
11424 CFM (Measured)
11.88 tons
12.00 tons
28.00 sq-ft
9.39 pre 10.22 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
13-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
88
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
87
EWB
65
70
El
75%
87%
Cl
80%
81%
EER
8.5
11.5
kW
14.85
13.46
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
86
87
exhaust
115
110
Cond Air
AT(K)
16.1
12.8
kW
17.6
17
(kg/sec)
6.47
8.52
tons
29.81
31.12
EER
20.33
21.97
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
14.85
9.75
8.5
13.46
10.67
11.5
CU
17.6
29.81
20.33
17.0
31.12
21.97
Lit
12.85
12.19
11.38
13.09
13.17
13.26
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
116%
80%
75%
103%
81%
87%
CU/Lit
137%
245%
179%
130%
236%
166%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
89%
100%
100%
97%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
15.6
9.5
7.9
13.9
9.6
9.1
CU
18.5
29.1
18.8
17.6
28.1
17.5
Literature
13.52
11.88
10.54
13.52
11.88
10.54
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
116%
80%
75%
103%
81%
87%
CU/Lit
137%
245%
179%
130%
236%
1 66%
SA/CU
84%
33%
42%
79%
34%
52%
Predicted/SA
119%
-
103%
Predicted/CU
50%
-
54%
Predicted/
Original
89%
-
97%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
8.5
11.5
7.9
9.1
15.3%
Condenser Test
20.33
21.97
18.84
17.47
-7.3%
Spreadsheet
9.39
10.22
9.39
10.22
8.8%
Weighted Average 184.0%
-87.2%
105.9%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-9
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D2CG240N24046FDE
NGFM089948
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-8
9.6 Amps
460 Volts
0.68
2.10 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
X
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.1
0.75
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
20.8 kW
2.34 kW
0.00 kW
23.12 kW-Condensing side only
12.0% Performance Degradation
10.7
10.7
20.71
7
12%
9.4
1.28
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
4
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
3.9
3.3
4.5
4.1
3.3
2.1
3.5
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Coil Number
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
487
487
t Measurement
10
82
62
15
85
84%
96%
20
97
26.80
41.3 8.2 0.41
41.4 20 0.99
Measured circuit 2
F (compressors 3&4)
F All compressors were
% running during the
% test.
nput capacty and
power projections
multiplied by 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
98 F 310 K
128.5 F 327 K
74 in
29 in
2
29.8 sq-ft
6319
3.58 kg/sec
17.34 Tons
7.38 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-8
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D2CG240N24046FDE
NGFM089948
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-8
9.6 Amps
460 Volts
0.68
2.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0.25
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
20.8 kW
2.34 kW
0.00 kW
23.12 kW - Condensing side only
2.5% Performance Degradation
10.7
10.7
20.71
7
3%
10.2
1.18
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
4
3-Phase
1.73
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
9.2
9.8
12.3
10.8
9.2
9.4
10.1
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
483
485
t Measurement
10
82
62
15
85
96%
94%
10
85
23.60
36.7 6
37 1"
4 0.36
.8 0.98
Measured circuit 2
F (compressors 38,4)
F All compressors were
% running during the
% test.
I nput capacity and
power projections
multiplied by 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
85 F
110. 5 F
74 in
29 in
29.8 sq-ft
18092
10.25 kg/sec
41. 52 Tons
20.59 EER
303 K
317 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-8
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-8 Summary
10.7 BTU/W-h
6319 CFM (Measured)
20.71 tons
20.00 tons
29.81 sq-ft
9.35 pre 10.19 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
27-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
97
Post Adsil Measurements
17-Jun
85
EWB
55
55
El
84%
96%
Cl
96%
94%
EER
8.2
10.5
kW
27.75
24.44
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
98
85
exhaust
128.5
110.5
Cond Air
AT(K)
16.9
14.2
kW
28.2
24.2
(kg/sec)
3.58
10.25
tons
17.34
41.52
EER
7.38
20.59
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
27.75
17.22
8.2
24.44
17.72
10.5
CU
28.2
17.34
7.38
24.2
41.52
20.59
Lit
22.10
17.94
9.74
20.78
18.86
10.89
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
126%
96%
84%
118%
94%
96%
CU/Lit
128%
97%
76%
116%
220%
189%
SS/Lit
99%
100%
88%
99%
100%
95%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
29.2
19.9
9.0
27.4
19.5
10.2
CU
29.7
20.0
8.1
27.1
45.6
20.2
Literature
23.29
20.71
10.67
23.29
20.71
10.67
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
126%
96%
84%
118%
94%
96%
CU/Lit
128%
97%
76%
116%
220%
1 89%
SA/CU
98%
99%
111%
101%
43%
51%
Predicted/SA
104%
-
91%
Predicted/CU
116%
-
46%
Predicted/
Original
88%
-
95%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
8.2
10.5
9.0
10.2
14.3%
Condenser Test
7.38
20.59
8.09
20.18
149.5%
Spreadsheet
9.35
10.19
9.35
10.19
9.0%
Weighted Average 285.7%
2989.8%
179.1%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-8
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D7CG060N07946A
NGFM091009
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-6
8.0 Amps
460 Volts
0.87
0.80 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.30
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.5 kW
0.26 kW
1.06 kW
5.80 kW - Condensing side only
4.0% Performance Degradation
10.9
10.9
5.25
7
4%
10.2
1.18
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.4
6.2
5.7
6.2
6.1
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
485
485
t Measurement
10
75
55
35
85
1 03%
98%
5
95
NA
11.6 0
10.75 5
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
95 F
114 F
74 in
29 in
14.9sq-ft
5477
3.10 kg/sec
9.36 Tons
19.05 EER
7 0.13
2 1.00
308 K
319 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-6
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D7CG060N07946A
NGFM091009
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-6
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
10.9
10.9
5.25
7
0%
10.6
1.14
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
8 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.87 Compressor quantity:
0.8 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.3
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.5 kW
0.26 kW
1.06 kW
5.80 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
7.2
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.425
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
483
485
t Measurement
10
75
55
35
85
99%
98%
5
88
6.00
11 0
11.7 5
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
108 F
74 in
29 in
14.9sq-ft
6639
3.76 kg/sec
12.55 Tons
25.96 EER
6 0.11
2 1.00
304 K
315 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-6
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-6 Summary
10.9 BTU/W-h
5477 CFM (Measured)
5.25 tons
5.00 tons
14.90 sq-ft
10.17 pre 10.56 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
95
Post Adsil Measurements
15-Jun
88
EWB
58
58
El
103%
99%
Cl
98%
98%
EER
11.0
11.6
kW
NA
6.30
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
95
87
exhaust
114
108
Cond Air
AT(K)
10.6
11.7
kW
5.9
5.8
(kg/sec)
3.10
3.76
tons
9.36
12.55
EER
19.05
25.96
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
NA
5.15
11.0
6.30
5.42
11.6
CU
5.9
9.36
19.05
5.8
12.55
25.96
Lit
5.90
5.25
10.68
5.65
5.53
11.74
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
98%
103%
112%
98%
99%
CU/Lit
100%
178%
178%
103%
227%
221 %
SS/Lit
100%
100%
94%
100%
100%
97%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
NA
5.1
11.2
6.5
5.1
10.8
CU
5.8
9.4
19.4
6.0
11.9
24.0
Literature
5.80
5.25
10.86
5.80
5.25
10.86
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
98%
103%
112%
98%
99%
CU/Lit
100%
178%
178%
103%
227%
221%
SA/CU
NA
55%
58%
109%
43%
45%
Predicted/SA
91%
-
95%
Predicted/CU
53%
-
42%
Predicted/
Original
94%
-
97%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.0
11.6
11.2
10.8
-3.9%
Condenser Test
19.05
25.96
19.36
24.02
24.0%
Spreadsheet
10.17
10.56
10.17
10.56
3.8%
Weighted Average -19.4%
120.2%
19.2%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-6
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D7CG060N07946A
NGFM091011
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-5
8.0 Amps
460 Volts
0.87
0.80 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.30
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.25
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.5 kW
0.26 kW
1.06 kW
5.80 kW - Condensing side only
4.0% Performance Degradation
10.9
10.9
5.25
7
4%
10.2
1.18
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.5
5.3
4.5
3.1
4.4
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
480
483
t Measurement
10
75
55
25
85
72%
68%
5
93
5.80
11.25 0
10.7 5
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
91 F
115 F
74 in
29 in
14.9sq-ft
3890
2.20 kg/sec
8.40 Tons
16.53 EER
9 0.17
2 1.00
306 K
319 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-5
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D7CG060N07946A
NGFM091011
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Cenl
RTU-5
8 Amps
460 Volts
0.87
0.8 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.3
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kWrton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.5 kW
0.26 kW
1.06 kW
5.80 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
10.9
10.9
5.25
7
0%
10.6
1.14
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.1
6
5.7
6.1
6.0
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
485
489
t Measurement
10
68
48
50
85
82%
74%
5
84
5.50
10.5 0.3 0.07
10.3 5 1.00
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
84 F 302 K
101 F 311 K
74 in
29 n
14.9 sq-ft
5343
3.03 kg/sec
8. 17 Tons
18.51 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-5
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-5 Summary
10.9 BTU/W-h
3890 CFM (Measured)
5.25 tons
5.00 tons
14.90 sq-ft
10.17 pre 10.56 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
93
Post Adsil Measurements
15-Jun
84
EWB
55
57
El
72%
82%
Cl
68%
74%
EER
7.8
10.1
kW
6.09
6.09
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
91
84
exhaust
115
101
Cond Air
AT(K)
13.3
9.4
kW
6.1
5.3
(kg/sec)
2.20
3.03
tons
8.40
8.17
EER
16.53
18.51
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
6.09
3.62
7.8
6.09
4.21
10.1
CU
6.1
8.40
16.53
5.3
8.17
18.51
Lit
5.91
5.33
10.82
5.54
5.68
12.30
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
103%
68%
72%
110%
74%
82%
CU/Lit
103%
158%
153%
96%
1 44%
150%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
94%
100%
100%
97%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
6.0
3.6
7.8
6.4
3.9
8.9
CU
6.0
8.3
16.6
5.5
7.6
16.3
Literature
5.80
5.25
10.86
5.80
5.25
10.86
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
103%
68%
72%
110%
74%
82%
CU/Lit
103%
158%
153%
96%
1 44%
1 50%
SA/CU
100%
43%
47%
115%
51%
55%
Predicted/SA
130%
-
114%
Predicted/CU
61%
-
62%
Predicted/
Original
94%
-
97%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
7.8
10.1
7.8
8.9
13.9%
Condenser Test
16.53
18.51
16.59
16.34
-1.5%
Spreadsheet
10.17
10.56
10.17
10.56
3.8%
Weighted Average 69.4%
-7.5%
19.2%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-5
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D7CG060N07946A
NGFM091011
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-4
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
10.9
10.9
5.25
7
2%
10.4
1.16
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
8.0 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.87 Compressor quantity:
0.80 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.30
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
0.9
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.5 kW
0.26 kW
1.06 kW
5.80 kW - Condensing side only
1.7% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.9
6.8
5.5
5.5
5.675
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
480
480
t Measurment
10
68
48
50
85
79%
73%
5
90
5.70
10.5 5
10.8 0
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90 F
105 F
74 in
29 in
14.9sq-ft
5074
2.87 kg/sec
6.85 Tons
14.68 EER
1 1
5 0.09
305 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-4
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D7CG060N07946A
NGFM091011
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-4
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
10.9
10.9
5.25
7
0%
10.6
1.14
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
8 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.87 Compressor quantity:
0.8 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.3
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.5 kW
0.26 kW
1.06 kW
5.80 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.2
7.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
484
486
t Measurment
10
68
48
50
85
85%
78%
5
85
5.70
10.7 0
10.5 5
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
86 F
104 F
74 in
29 in
14.9sq-ft
6349
3.60 kg/sec
10.28 Tons
22.44 EER
4 0.07
1 1.00
303 K
313 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-4
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-4 Summary
10.9 BTU/W-h
5074 CFM (Measured)
5.25 tons
5.00 tons
14.90 sq-ft
10.39 pre 10.56 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
90
Post Adsil Measurements
15-Jun
85
EWB
57
57
El
79%
85%
Cl
73%
78%
EER
9.0
10.3
kW
5.99
5.99
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
90
86
exhaust
105
104
Cond Air
AT(K)
8.3
10.0
kW
5.6
5.5
(kg/sec)
2.87
3.60
tons
6.85
10.28
EER
14.68
22.44
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
5.99
3.98
9.0
5.99
4.40
10.3
CU
5.6
6.85
14.68
5.5
10.28
22.44
Lit
5.75
5.45
11.37
5.58
5.64
12.14
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
1 04%
73%
79%
107%
78%
85%
CU/Lit
97%
126%
129%
99%
182%
185%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
97%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
6.0
3.8
8.6
6.2
4.1
9.2
CU
5.7
6.6
14.0
5.7
9.6
20.1
Literature
5.80
5.25
10.86
5.80
5.25
10.86
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
104%
73%
79%
107%
78%
85%
CU/Lit
97%
126%
129%
99%
1 82%
1 85%
SA/CU
107%
58%
61%
109%
43%
46%
Predicted/SA
121%
-
113%
Predicted/CU
74%
-
52%
Predicted/
Original
96%
-
97%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
9.0
10.3
8.6
9.2
7.6%
Condenser Test
14.68
22.44
14.03
20.07
43.1%
Spreadsheet
10.39
10.56
10.39
10.56
1.7%
Weighted Average 38.0%
215.5%
8.3%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-4
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
York
D3CG090N1304GG
NGFM090091
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-2
7.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.64
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.30
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
0.9
0.1
1
0.1
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.2 kW
0.84 kW
0.00 kW
8.07 kW - Condensing side only
0.52% Performance Degradation
11.1
11.1
7.49
7
1%
10.8
1.12
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
FPM
7.2
8.2
5.3
4.9
7.8
5.5
6.483
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Volts
480
480
t Measurement
10
70
50
28
85
Circuit 1
92%
93%
3.5
85
4.20
Amps kW PF
15.5
13.4 5
F
F
%
%
3 0.41
8 0.92
Circuit 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
83 F
105 F
41 in
29 in
16.5sq-ft
6424
3.64 kg/sec
12.72 Tons
17.34 EER
98%
96%
3.5 Tons
86 F
4.10 kW
301 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-2
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
York
D3CG090N1304GG
NGFM090091
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-2
7.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.64
1.3 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kWrton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.2 kW
0.84 kW
0.00 kW
8.07 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
11.1
11.2
7.50
7
0%
10.8
1.11
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
Btu/W-hr (CD Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Average
FPM
11.5
11.7
11.9
12.5
11.5
11.5
14.3
13.9
11.1
14.6
13.5
13.5
12.625
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
480
485
t Measurement
10
70
50
30
85
Circuit 1
100%
99%
3.5
88
4.10
15.2 2
13.4
F
F
%
%
9 0.4
5 0.92
Circuit 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
88.5 F
104.5 F
41 in
29 in
16.5 sq-ft
12509
7.08 kg/sec
18.01 Tons
24.29 EER
00%
99%
3.5 Tons
89 F
4.20 kW
305 K
313 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-2
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-2 Summary
11.1 BTU/W-h
6424 CFM (Measured)
7.49 tons
7.00 tons
16.51 sq-ft
10.76 pre 10.83 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
85
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
88
EWB
53
53
El
95%
100%
Cl
95%
99%
EER
11.2
11.1
kW
8.88
8.88
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
83
88.5
exhaust
105
104.5
Cond Air
AT(K)
12.2
8.9
kW
8.8
8.9
(kg/sec)
3.64
7.08
tons
12.72
18.01
EER
17.34
24.29
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
8.88
6.70
11.2
8.88
6.91
11.1
CU
8.8
12.72
17.34
8.9
18.01
24.29
Lit
7.25
7.09
11.75
7.52
6.98
11.14
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
123%
95%
95%
118%
99%
100%
CU/Lit
121%
179%
148%
118%
258%
218%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
97%
100%
100%
97%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
9.9
7.1
10.6
9.5
7.4
11.1
CU
9.8
13.4
16.4
9.6
19.3
24.2
Literature
8.08
7.49
11.12
8.08
7.49
11.12
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
123%
95%
95%
118%
99%
100%
CU/Lit
121%
179%
148%
118%
258%
218%
SA/CU
101%
53%
64%
100%
38%
46%
Predicted/SA
102%
-
97%
Predicted/CU
66%
-
44%
Predicted/
Original
97%
-
97%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.2
11.1
10.6
11.1
5.3%
Condenser Test
17.34
24.29
16.44
24.28
47.6%
Spreadsheet
10.76
10.83
10.76
10.83
0.7%
Weighted Average 36.8%
333.4%
4.6%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-2
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
York
D3CG090N1304GG
NGFM090089
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-1
7.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.64
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.30
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
0.9
0.1
1
0.1
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.2 kW
0.84 kW
0.00 kW
8.07 kW - Condensing side only
0.52% Performance Degradation
11.1
11.1
7.49
7
1%
10.8
1.12
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.7
12.7
6.4
14.3
9.525
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Volts
477
481
t Measurement
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
95%
1 02%
3.5
94
4.40
Amps kW PF
16.5 3
14.5 6
F
F
%
%
5 0.46
8 0.95
Circuit 2
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
95 F
112. 5 F
41 in
29 in
16.5sq-ft
9438
5.34 kg/sec
14.86 Tons
17.32 EER
Tons
F
kW
308 K
318 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
York
D3CG090N1304GG
NGFM090089
RTU-Gas
1997
Monroe Aquatic Center
RTU-1
7.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.64
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1 .3
460
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
7.2 kW
0.84 kW
0.00 kW
8.07 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
11.1
11.1
7.49
7
0%
10.8
1.11
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Average
ft/sec
12.4
11.8
12.6
13.4
13.7
12.4
12.717
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
476
483
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
99%
101%
3.5
91
4.30
15.6 3
14.1 6
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90.5 F
106. 5 F
41 in
29 in
16.5sq-ft
12600
7.14 kg/sec
18. 14 Tons
22.44 EER
2 0.42
5 0.95
306 K
315 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-1
-------
Monroe Aquatic Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-1 Summary
11.1 BTU/W-h
9438 CFM (Measured)
7.49 tons
3.50 tons
16.51 sq-ft
10.76 pre 10.81 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
94
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
91
EWB
61
61
El
95%
99%
Cl
102%
101%
EER
10.5
10.9
kW
9.41
9.20
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
95
90.5
exhaust
112.5
106.5
Cond Air
AT(K)
9.7
8.9
kW
10.3
9.7
(kg/sec)
5.34
7.14
tons
14.86
18.14
EER
17.32
22.44
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
9.41
7.07
10.5
9.20
7.13
10.9
CU
10.3
14.86
17.32
9.7
18.14
22.44
Lit
7.93
6.93
10.49
7.68
7.06
11.02
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
119%
102%
100%
120%
1 01 %
99%
CU/Lit
130%
214%
165%
126%
257%
204%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
97%
100%
100%
97%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
9.6
7.6
11.1
9.7
7.6
11.0
CU
10.5
16.1
18.4
10.2
19.3
22.7
Literature
8.08
7.49
11.12
8.08
7.49
11.12
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
119%
102%
100%
120%
101%
99%
CU/Lit
130%
214%
165%
126%
257%
204%
SA/CU
91%
48%
60%
95%
39%
49%
Predicted/SA
97%
-
98%
Predicted/CU
59%
-
47%
Predicted/
Original
97%
-
97%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
10.5
10.9
10.6
11.0
4.2%
Condenser Test
17.32
22.44
18.38
22.68
23.4%
Spreadsheet
10.76
10.81
10.76
10.81
0.5%
Weighted Average 14.7%
82.0%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Monroe Aquatics Center
RTU-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Tempstar
CH9536VKB2
L970880635
Split Heat pump
1997
Locust City Hall
SS-2
16.0 An
208 Vc
0.96
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.30
208
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
1
0.1
0.05
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.2 kW
0.19 kW
0.00 kW
3.38 kW - Condensing side only
5.95% Performance Degradation
10.6
10.6
3.00
7
6%
9.8
1.23
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
4.7
5.5
2.7
6.4
4.825
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
120
120
t Measurment
112%
1 09%
3
94
3.50
10.78 1.
10.56 1.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
95 F
104 F
88 in
29 in
17.7sq-ft
5131
2.91 kg/sec
4. 16 Tons
21. 22 EER
17 0.91
18 0.93
308 K
313 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Locust, NC Police Department
HP-2
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Tempstar
CH9536VKB2
L970880635
Split Heat pump
1997
Locust City Hall
SS-2
16 An
208 Vc
0.96
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.3
208
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.2 kW
0.19 kW
0.00 kW
3.38 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
10.6
10.6
3.00
7
0%
10.3
1.16
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.5
6.8
6.6
6.4
6.325
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
118
118
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
118%
116%
3
89
3.60
10.48 1.
10.35 1.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
89 F
100 F
88 in
29 in
17.7sq-ft
6726
3.81 kg/sec
6.66 Tons
35.20 EER
15 0.91
12 0.91
305 K
311 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Locust, NC Police Department
HP-2
-------
Locust City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-2 Summary
10.6 BTU/W-h
5131 CFM (Measured)
3.00 tons
3.00 tons
17.72 sq-ft
9.76 pre 10.33 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
94
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
89
EWB
NA
NA
El
1 1 2%
1 1 8%
Cl
109%
116%
EER
11.9
12.5
kW
3.50
3.60
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
95
89
exhaust
104
100
Cond Air
AT(K)
5.0
6.1
kW
2.35
2.27
(kg/sec)
2.91
3.81
tons
4.16
6.66
EER
21.22
35.20
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
3.50
NA
11.9
3.60
NA
12.5
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
SS/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU
Literature
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
SA/CU
Predicted/SA
NA
NA
Predicted/CU
Predicted/
Original
NA
NA
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.9
12.5
11.9
12.5
5.4%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
11.7
11.9
11.7
11.9
1.9%
Weighted Average 16.1%
NA
5.8%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Locust, NC Police Department
HP-2
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Tempstar
CH9536VKB2
L970880635
Split Heat pump
1997
Locust City Hall
SS-1
16.0 An
208 Vc
0.96
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.30
208
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
1
0.8
0.2
0.05
0.2
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.2 kW
0.19 kW
0.00 kW
3.38 kW - Condensing side only
7.2% Performance Degradation
10.6
10.6
3.00
7
7%
9.7
1.24
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
FPM
6.6
7.6
4.7
5.5
6.100
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
120
120
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
118%
114%
3
93
3.50
12.7 1.
11.7 1
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
93 F
105 F
88 in
29 in
17.7sq-ft
6486
3.67 kg/sec
7.00 Tons
31. 02 EER
41 0.98
3 0.56
307 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Locust, NC City Hall
HP-1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Tempstar
CH9536VKB2
L970880635
Split Heat pump
1997
Locust City Hall
SS-1
16 An
208 Vc
0.96
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.3
208
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.2 kW
0.19 kW
0.00 kW
3.38 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
10.6
10.6
3.00
7
0%
10.3
1.16
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
FPM
7.2
8.2
8.6
6.6
7.650
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
120
120
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
122%
117%
3
87
3.50
11.5 1.
11.5 1.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
101 F
88 in
29 in
17.7sq-ft
8135
4.61 kg/sec
10.25 Tons
49.00 EER
25 0.91
26 0.91
304 K
311 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Locust, NC City Hall
HP-1
-------
Locust City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-1 Summary
10.6 BTU/W-h
6486 CFM (Measured)
3.00 tons
3.00 tons
17.72 sq-ft
9.65 pre 10.33 post
Equipment age
7 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
93
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
87
EWB
62
62
El
1 1 8%
122%
Cl
114%
117%
EER
12.6
13.0
kW
3.50
3.50
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
93
87
exhaust
105
101
Cond Air
AT(K)
6.7
7.8
kW
2.71
2.51
(kg/sec)
3.67
4.61
tons
7.00
10.25
EER
31.02
49.00
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
3.50
NA
12.6
3.50
NA
13.0
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
SS/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU
Literature
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
SA/CU
Predicted/SA
NA
NA
Predicted/CU
Predicted/
Original
NA
NA
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
12.6
13.0
12.6
13.0
3.4%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
11.7
11.9
11.7
11.9
1.9%
Weighted Average 10.2%
NA
5.8%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Locust, NC City Hall
HP-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
48DJE004630
0292G64683
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-3
6.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.71
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps: 1.00
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.50
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.32 kW
0.48 kW
3.74 kW-Condensing side only
10.0% Performance Degradation
9.5
9.5
2.97
12
10%
8.1
1.49
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
12.5
13.1
12.8
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.3
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
466
467
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
102%
99%
4
83
3.53
5.7 1.2 0.45
5.4 2.5 0.99
F
F
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
85 F 303 K
94 F 308 K
62 in
28 in
12.1 sq-ft
9259
5.24 kg/sec
7.50 Tons
24.32 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaulation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-3
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
48DJE004630
0292G64683
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-3
6.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.71
1 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.5
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.32 kW
0.48 kW
3.74 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
9.5
9.5
2.97
12
0%
8.8
1.36
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
FPM
13.9
13.9
13.9
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
467
469
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
104%
100%
3
79
3.50
5.8 1
5.7 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
77 F
85 F
62 in
28 in
12.1 sq-ft
10054
5.69 kg/sec
7.24 Tons
23.48 EER
2 0.46
5 1.00
298 K
303 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaulation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-3
-------
Iredell Health Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-3 Summary
9.5 BTU/W-h
9259 CFM (Measured)
2.97 tons
4.00 tons
12.06 sq-ft
8.06 pre 8.80 post
Equipment age
12 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
83
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
79
EWB
62
62
El
102%
104%
Cl
99%
100%
EER
10.5
11.4
kW
2.61
2.60
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
85
77
exhaust
94
85
Cond Air
AT(K)
5.0
4.4
kW
3.7
3.7
(kg/sec)
5.24
5.69
tons
7.50
7.24
EER
24.32
23.48
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
NA
2.87
10.5
NA
2.99
11.4
CU
3.7
7.50
24.32
3.7
7.24
23.48
Lit
3.37
2.90
10.32
3.28
2.99
10.93
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
99%
102%
NA
100%
1 04%
CU/Lit
110%
259%
236%
113%
242%
215%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
85%
100%
100%
93%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
NA
2.9
9.7
NA
3.0
9.9
CU
4.1
7.7
22.4
4.2
7.2
20.4
Literature
3.75
2.97
9.50
3.75
2.97
9.50
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
99%
102%
NA
100%
104%
CU/Lit
110%
259%
236%
113%
242%
215%
SA/CU
NA
38%
43%
NA
41%
48%
Predicted/SA
83%
-
82%
Predicted/CU
36%
-
39%
Predicted/
Original
85%
-
93%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
10.5
11.4
9.7
9.9
2.0%
Condenser Test
24.32
23.48
22.41
20.42
-8.9%
Spreadsheet
8.06
8.80
8.06
8.80
9.3%
Weighted Average 7.8%
-35.5%
37.0%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaulation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-3
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
48DJD007
5291G62648
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-14
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
10.8
10.8
6.30
12
9%
9.2
1.30
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
10.4 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.81 Compressor quantity:
1.00
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.80
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.7 kW
0.32 kW
0.58 kW
7.03 kW-Condensing side only
8.6% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
10.5
9.2
9.9
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.1
0.25
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
464
465
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
NA
NA
6
88
NA
12.8 2.
13.9 6.
F
F
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
88 F
109 F
62 in
28 in
12.1 sq-ft
7125
4.03 kg/sec
13.47 Tons
18.79 EER
25 0.39
35 0.98
304 K
316 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-14
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
48DJD007
5291G62648
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-14
10.4 Amps
460 Volts
0.81
1 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.8
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.7 kW
0.32 kW
0.58 kW
7.03 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
Amps
Volts
10.8 Btu/W-hr
10.8 Btu/W-hr
6.3 tons
12 years
0% (% degraded)
10.0 Btu/W-hr
1.20
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
(CU Only)
(CU Only)
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
12.1
11.1
11.6
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
465
466
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
100%
103%
5
80
6.10
12.3 1
13.5 6
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
79 F
96 F
62 in
28 in
12.1 sq-ft
8391
4.75 kg/sec
12. 84 Tons
19.50 EER
9 0.34
0 0.97
299 K
309 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-14
-------
Iredell Health Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-14 Summary
10.8 BTU/W-h
7125 CFM (Measured)
6.30 tons
6.00 tons
12.06 sq-ft
9.23 pre 9.96 post
Equipment age
12 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
88
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
80
EWB
62
62
El
NA
100%
Cl
NA
103%
EER
NA
12.0
kW
NA
6.41
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
88
79
exhaust
109
96
Cond Air
AT(K)
11.7
9.4
kW
8.6
7.9
(kg/sec)
4.03
4.75
tons
13.47
12.84
EER
18.79
19.50
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
NA
NA
NA
6.41
6.38
12.0
CU
8.6
13.47
18.79
7.9
12.84
19.50
Lit
6.53
5.92
10.87
6.21
6.19
11.96
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
103%
103%
100%
CU/Lit
132%
227%
173%
127%
207%
163%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
86%
100%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
NA
NA
NA
7.2
6.5
10.8
CU
9.2
14.3
18.6
8.9
13.1
17.6
Literature
7.02
6.30
10.78
7.02
6.30
10.78
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
103%
103%
100%
CU/Lit
132%
227%
173%
127%
207%
1 63%
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
81%
50%
61%
Predicted/SA
NA
-
86%
Predicted/CU
50%
-
53%
Predicted/
Original
86%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
NA
12.0
NA
10.8
NA
Condenser Test
18.79
19.50
18.59
17.54
-5.7%
Spreadsheet
9.23
9.96
9.23
9.96
8.0%
Weighted Average NA
-34.0%
47.8
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-14
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
48DJD006
0492G68975
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-13
9.6 Amps
460 Volts
0.79
1.00
460
0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.80
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.0 kW
0.32 kW
0.58 kW
6.36 kW-Condensing side only
6.35% Performance Degradation
9.8
9.8
5.19
12
6%
8.6
1.40
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.5
0.5
0.15
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
460
460
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
94%
97%
5
87
6.10
10 1.9 0.39
10.1 4.65 0.99
F
F
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
83 F 301 K
102 F 312 K
63 in
29 in
12.7 sq-ft
6090
3.45 kg/sec
10.41 Tons
19.08 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-13
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
48DJD006
0492G68975
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-13
9.6 Amps
460 Volts
0.79
1 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.8
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.0 kW
0.32 kW
0.58 kW
6.36 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
9.8
9.8
5.2
12
0%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
12.5
10.0
11.3
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
^l
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
465
465
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
100%
103%
5
80
6.10
9.8 1
9.9 4
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
77 F
93 F
63 in
29 in
12.7 sq-ft
8564
4.85 kg/sec
12.33 Tons
24.26 EER
6 0.35
5 0.98
298 K
307 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-13
-------
Iredell Health Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-13 Summary
9.8 BTU/W-h
6090 CFM (Measured)
5.19 tons
5.00 tons
12.69 sq-ft
8.56 pre 9.06 post
Equipment age
12 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
87
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
80
EWB
62
62
El
94%
100%
Cl
97%
103%
EER
10.0
11.0
kW
6.33
6.33
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
83
77
exhaust
102
93
Cond Air
AT(K)
10.6
8.9
kW
6.55
6.1
(kg/sec)
3.45
4.85
tons
10.41
12.33
EER
19.08
24.26
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
6.33
4.87
10.0
6.33
5.25
11.0
CU
6.55
10.41
19.08
6.1
12.33
24.26
Lit
5.67
5.02
10.62
5.57
5.09
10.98
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
112%
97%
94%
114%
103%
100%
CU/Lit
116%
207%
180%
110%
242%
221 %
SS/Lit
101%
100%
87%
101%
100%
92%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
7.1
5.0
9.3
7.2
5.3
9.8
CU
7.3
10.8
17.7
6.9
12.6
21.7
Literature
6.32
5.19
9.85
6.32
5.19
9.85
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
112%
97%
94%
1 1 4%
103%
100%
CU/Lit
116%
207%
180%
110%
242%
221%
SA/CU
97%
47%
52%
104%
43%
45%
Predicted/SA
92%
-
87%
Predicted/CU
48%
-
39%
Predicted/
Original
87%
-
92%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
10.0
11.0
9.2
9.8
6.4%
Condenser Test
19.08
24.26
17.58
21.62
23.0%
Spreadsheet
8.56
9.06
8.56
9.06
5.9%
Weighted Average 31.9%
114.9%
29.4%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-13
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
48DJE004630
0292G64667
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-1
6.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.71
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps: 1.00
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.50
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.32 kW
0.48 kW
3.74 kW-Condensing side only
10.8% Performance Degradation
9.5
9.5
2.97
12
11%
8.0
1.50
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
11.5
12.5
12.0
0.8
0.2
0.25
0.25
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
467
466
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
102%
97%
3
87
3.50
5.5 1.3 0.5
5.1 2.4 0.99
F
F
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
85 F 303 K
93 F 307 K
62 in
28 in
12.1 sq-ft
8680
4.92 kg/sec
6.25 Tons
20.27 EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Sheet 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
48DJE004630
0292G64667
RTU-Gas
1992
Iredell Health Center
RTU-1
6.1 Amps
460 Volts
0.705
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
1 Amps Power supply:
460 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
9.5
9.5
2.97
12
0%
8.8
1.36
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 1.5
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.32 kW
0.48 kW
3.74 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
Average
ft/sec
13.1
12.7
10.9
12.4
10.2
11.9
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
470
471
t Measurement
10
74
54
50
85
107%
1 04%
3
79
3.50
5.6 1
4.9 0
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
75 F
84 F
62 in
28 in
12.1 sq-ft
8579
4.86 kg/sec
6.95 Tons
37.90 EER
3 0.98
9 0.41
297 K
302 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Sheet 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-1
-------
Iredell Health Center
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-1 Summary
9.5 BTU/W-h
8680 CFM (Measured)
2.97 tons
3.00 tons
12.06 sq-ft
8.00 pre 8.80 post
Equipment age
12 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
87
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
79
EWB
62
62
El
102%
107%
Cl
97%
1 04%
EER
9.9
11.7
kW
3.46
3.46
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
85
75
exhaust
93
84
Cond Air
AT(K)
4.4
5.0
kW
3.7
2.2
(kg/sec)
4.92
4.86
tons
6.25
6.95
EER
20.27
37.90
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
3.46
2.72
9.9
3.46
3.11
11.7
CU
3.7
6.25
20.27
2.2
6.95
37.90
Lit
3.46
2.80
9.74
3.28
2.99
10.93
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
100%
97%
102%
105%
1 04%
107%
CU/Lit
107%
223%
208%
67%
232%
347%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
84%
100%
100%
93%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
3.8
2.9
9.7
3.9
3.1
10.2
CU
4.0
6.6
19.8
2.5
6.9
32.9
Literature
3.75
2.97
9.50
3.75
2.97
9.50
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
100%
97%
102%
105%
104%
107%
CU/Lit
107%
223%
208%
67%
232%
347%
SA/CU
94%
44%
49%
157%
45%
31%
Predicted/SA
83%
-
79%
Predicted/CU
40%
-
24%
Predicted/
Original
84%
-
93%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
9.9
11.7
9.7
10.2
4.9%
Condenser Test
20.27
37.90
19.79
32.96
66.6%
Spreadsheet
8.00
8.80
8.00
8.80
10.0%
Weighted Average 14.7%
199.7%
29.9%
HVAC Data Sheet
Sheet 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Iredell Health Center, NC
RTU-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Lennox
HS290609Y
S801M14822
SS
2001
Granite Quarry
SS-3
17.3 Al
208 V(
0.95
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.90
208
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
1
0.35
0.9
0.1
0.1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.9 kW
0.28 kW
0.00 kW
6.19 kW-Condensing side only
7.3% Performance Degradation
NA
9.7
5.00
3
7%
9.1
1.32
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
1.1
2.7
1.3
1.5
1.6
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
199
199
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
94%
87%
5
77
5.60
12.2 2
15.9 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
78 F
102 F
66 in
30 in
13.8sq-ft
1351
0.77 kg/sec
2.92 Tons
7.61 EER
4 0.99
2 0.70
299 K
312 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Granite Quarry, NC
SS-3
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Lennox
HS290609Y
S801M 14822
SS
2001
Granite Quarry
SS-3
17.3 Al
208 V(
0.95
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.9
208
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.9 kW
0.28 kW
0.00 kW
6.19 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
NA
9.7
5.00
3
0%
9.8
1.23
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.9
6.2
6.8
5.6
6.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
197
200
t Measurment
10
70
50
50
85
5
92
13.7 2
18.5 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
92 F
121 F
66 in
30 in
13.8sq-ft
5053
2.86 kg/sec
13. 19 Tons
30.43 EER
6 0.97
6 0.70
306 K
323 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Granite Quarry, NC
SS-3
-------
Granite Quarry
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-3 Summary
9.7 BTU/W-h
1351 CFM (Measured)
5.00 tons
5.00 tons
13.75 sq-ft
9.12 pre 9.79 post
Equipment age
3 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
77
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
92
EWB
61
61
El
94%
NA
Cl
87%
NA
EER
9.1
NA
kW
5.60
NA
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
78
92
exhaust
102
121
Cond Air
AT(K)
13.3
16.1
kW
4.6
5.2
(kg/sec)
0.77
2.86
tons
2.92
13.19
EER
7.61
30.43
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
5.60
4.35
9.1
NA
NA
NA
CU
4.6
2.92
7.61
5.2
13.19
30.43
Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
NA
NA
Predicted/CU
-
Predicted/
Original
NA
NA
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
9.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condenser Test
7.61
30.43
NA
NA
75.0%
Spreadsheet
9.1
9.8
NA
NA
6.8%
Weighted Average NA
374.9%
34.2%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Granite Quarry, NC
SS-3
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Lennox
HS29-653
5895D63302
SS
1995
Granite Qu;
SS-2
17.3
208
0.95
jrry
Ai
V(
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.90
208
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.05
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.9 kW
0.28 kW
0.00 kW
6.19 kW-Condensing side only
7.7% Performance Degradation
NA
9.7
5.00
9
1.40
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
0.9
1.0
2.0
2.4
1.6
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
202
201
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
82%
76%
5
77
5.70
14.9 3
14.1 1
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
78 F
98 F
66 in
30 in
13.8sq-ft
1299
0.74 kg/sec
2.34 Tons
6.24 EER
0 0.99
5 0.53
299 K
310 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Granite Quarry
SS-2
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Lennox
HS29-653
5895D63302
SS
1995
Granite Qu;
SS-2
17.3
208
0.95
jrry
Ai
V(
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.9
208
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.9 kW
0.28 kW
0.00 kW
6.19 kW-Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
NA
9.7
5.00
9
0%
9.2
1.30
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.7
6.1
7.7
7.5
6.8
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
198
200
t Measurment
10
70
50
50
85
101%
105%
5
94
6.20
17.1 3
17.6 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
94 F
120 F
66 in
30 in
13.8sq-ft
5569
3.15 kg/sec
13.03 Tons
28.96 EER
4 0.99
0 0.58
308 K
322 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Granite Quarry
SS-2
-------
Granite Quarry
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-2 Summary
9.7 BTU/W-h
1299 CFM (Measured)
5.00 tons
5.00 tons
13.75 sq-ft
8.60 pre 9.23 post
Equipment age
9 years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
77
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
94
EWB
61
61
El
82%
101%
Cl
76%
105%
EER
7.9
9.8
kW
5.70
6.20
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
78
94
exhaust
98
120
Cond Air
AT(K)
11.1
14.4
kW
4.5
5.4
(kg/sec)
0.74
3.15
tons
2.34
13.03
EER
6.24
28.96
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
5.70
3.80
7.9
6.20
5.25
9.8
CU
4.5
2.34
6.24
5.4
13.03
28.96
Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
-
Predicted/SA
NA
NA
Predicted/CU
-
Predicted/
Original
NA
NA
EER Changes (Ambient Condions)
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
7.9
9.8
7.9
9.8
18.8%
Condenser Test
6.24
28.96
NA
NA
78.5%
Spreadsheet
8.6
9.2
NA
NA
6.8%
Weighted Average 94.1%
392.3%
34.2%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Granite Quarry
SS-2
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Goodman
CPKE36-18
9712425279
SS
1997
Concord City Hall
SS-5
17.3 Am|
208 Volt
0.95
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1.80
208
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
0.8
0.2
1
0.7
0.3
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.26 kW
0.00 kW
3.68 kW-Condensing side only
16.9% Performance Degradation
9.0
9.0
2.75
7
17%
7.5
1.60
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.7
6.4
7.2
5.1
6.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
120
118
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
101%
93%
3
88
3.40
13.8 1.
14.1 1
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
89 F
101 F
86 in
23 in
13.7sq-ft
5027
2.85 kg/sec
5.43 Tons
23.44 EER
58 0.97
2 0.72
305 K
311 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-5
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Goodman
CPKE36-18
9712425279
SS
1997
Concord City Hall
SS-5
17.3 Am|
208 Volt
0.95
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1 .8
208
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.4 kW
0.26 kW
0.00 kW
3.68 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
9.0
9.0
2.75
7
0%
8.7
1.38
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
7.6
6.6
8.0
7.6
7.5
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
120
119
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
93%
88%
3
87
3.40
14.3 1.
14.4 1.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
99 F
86 in
23 in
13.7sq-ft
6140
3.48 kg/sec
6.63 Tons
27.72 EER
64 0.96
23 0.72
304 K
310 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-5
-------
Concord City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-5 Summary
9.0 BTU/W-h
5027 CFM (Measured)
2.75 tons
3.00 tons
13.74sq-ft
7.48 pre 8.70 post
Equipment age
7 Years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
88
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
87
EWB
61
61
El
101%
93%
Cl
93%
88%
EER
9.1
8.3
kW
3.12
3.12
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
89
87
exhaust
101
99
Cond Air
AT(K)
6.7
NA
kW
2.78
NA
(kg/sec)
2.85
3.48
tons
5.43
6.63
EER
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
3.12
2.56
9.1
3.12
2.42
8.3
CU
2.78
5.43
NA
NA
6.63
NA
Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
NA
NA
Predicted/CU
NA
NA
Predicted/
Original
NA
NA
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
9.1
8.3
9.1
8.3
-7.9%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
7.48
8.70
7.48
8.70
16.4%
Weighted Average -23.8%
NA
49.1%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-5
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38CK036
3993E06985
Split System
1993
Concord City Hall
SS-4
8.9 Ami
230 Volt
0.93
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1 .40
230
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.3 kW
0.23 kW
0.00 kW
3.52 kW - Condensing side only
6.7% Performance Degradation
8.0
8.0
2.35
11
7%
7.0
1.70
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.5
5.5
5.5
7.6
6.0
0.95
0.05
0.8
0.05
0.2
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
204
206
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
95%
82%
3
93
3.20
7.5 0.
8.35 1.
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90 F
102 F
62 in
26 in
11.2sq-ft
4047
2.29 kg/sec
4.37 Tons
19.86 EER
0.60 kW/Ton
89 0.58
75 1 .00
305 K
312 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-4
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38CK036
3993E06985
Split System
1993
Concord City Hall
SS-4
8.9 Ami
230 Volt
0.93
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
1.4 Amps Power supply:
230 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
8.0
8.0
2.35
11
0%
7.5
1.60
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.3 kW
0.23 kW
0.00 kW
3.52 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
7.5
8.2
8.2
9.0
8.2
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
206
208
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
96%
84%
3
89
3.30
7.5 0
8.1 1
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90 F
99 F
62 in
26 in
11.19sq-ft
5524
3.13 kg/sec
4.47 Tons
20.65 EER
0.58 kW/Ton
9 0.59
7 1.00
305 K
310 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-4
-------
Concord City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-4 Summary
8.0 BTU/W-h
4047 CFM (Measured)
2.35 tons
3.00 tons
11.19 sq-ft
7.05 pre 7.49 post
Equipment age
11 Years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
93
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
89
ST-SH
37
31
El
95%
96%
Cl
82%
84%
EER
8.1
8.0
kW
2.51
2.58
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
90
90
exhaust
102
99
Cond Air
AT(K)
6.7
5.0
kW
2.64
2.6
(kg/sec)
2.29
3.13
tons
4.37
4.47
EER
19.86
20.65
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
2.51
2.03
8.1
2.58
1.90
8.0
CU
2.64
4.37
19.86
2.6
4.47
20.65
Lit
3.49
2.48
8.51
3.25
2.26
8.34
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
72%
82%
95%
80%
84%
96%
CU/Lit
76%
177%
233%
80%
198%
248%
SS/Lit
97%
91%
82%
97%
91%
87%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
2.6
2.1
8.2
2.9
2.2
8.2
CU
2.7
4.6
20.0
2.9
5.1
21.2
Literature
3.61
2.58
8.58
3.61
2.58
8.58
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
72%
82%
95%
80%
84%
96%
CU/Lit
76%
177%
233%
80%
1 98%
248%
SA/CU
95%
46%
41%
99%
42%
39%
Predicted/SA
86%
-
86%
Predicted/CU
35%
-
33%
Predicted/
Original
82%
-
87%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
8.1
8.0
7.6
7.7
1.1%
Condenser Test
19.86
20.65
18.70
19.83
6.1%
Spreadsheet
7.05
7.49
7.05
7.49
6.3%
Weighted Average 3.2%
18.3%
18.8%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-4
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier Published EER:
38CKC048-56 Calculated EER:
2802E15220 Nominal Capacity:
Split System Age
2002 Coil Conditon
Concord City Hall Present Condition EER
SS-3 kW/ton
14.1 Amps Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.78 Compressor quantity:
1.40 Amps Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
11.1
11.1
3.83
2
5%
10.8
1.11
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Coil Cleanliness
Fin Condition
Average
Fair
Poor
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.4
6.8
6.1
5.7
6.250
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.9 kW
0.20 kW
1.00 kW (From Product Data)
4.14 kW - Condensing side only
5.0% Performance Degradation
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
207
208
t Measurment
10
96%
90%
4
91
4.60
11.1 1
12.6 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
91 F
109 F
61 in
25 in
10.6sq-ft
3971
2.25 kg/sec
6.43 Tons
21. 44 EER
1 0.48
5 1.00
306 K
316 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-3
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38CKC048-56
2802E15220
Split System
2002
Concord City Hall
SS-3
14.1 Ami
208 Volt
0.775
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
1 .4
208
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
0
0
0
0
0
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
3.9 kW
0.20 kW
1.00 kW (From Product Data)
4.14 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
11.1
11.1
3.83
2
0%
11.3
1.06
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.8
7.2
7.0
5.8
6.7
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
208
206
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
90%
79%
3
89
4.27
10.6
11.8 2
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
90 F
106 F
61 in
25 in
10.6sq-ft
4257
2.41 kg/sec
6.13 Tons
21. 64 EER
0.45
4 0.99
305 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-3
-------
Concord City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-3 Summary
11.12 BTU/W-h
3971 CFM (Measured)
3.83 tons
4.00 tons
10.59 sq-ft
10.77
Equipment age
2 Years
Test Date
24- May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
91
Post Adsil Measurements
15-Jun
89
EWB
57
57
El
96%
90%
Cl
90%
79%
EER
10.3
10.0
kW
4.40
4.08
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
91
90
exhaust
109
106
Cond Air
AT(K)
10.0
8.9
kW
3.6
3.4
(kg/sec)
2.25
2.41
tons
6.43
6.13
EER
21.44
21.64
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
4.40
3.07
10.3
4.08
2.72
10.0
cu
3.6
6.43
21.44
3.4
6.13
21.64
Lit
3.82
3.41
10.72
3.73
3.44
11.06
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
115%
90%
96%
109%
79%
90%
CU/Lit
94%
189%
200%
91%
178%
196%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
97%
100%
100%
102%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
4.8
3.4
10.7
4.5
3.0
10.0
CU
3.9
7.2
22.2
3.8
6.8
21.8
Literature
4.13
3.83
11.12
4.13
3.83
11.12
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
115%
90%
96%
109%
79%
90%
CU/Lit
94%
189%
200%
91%
178%
1 96%
SA/CU
122%
48%
48%
120%
44%
46%
Predicted/SA
101%
-
108%
Predicted/CU
48%
-
50%
Predicted/
Original
97%
-
102%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
10.29
9.95
10.67
10.01
-6.3%
Condenser Test
21.44
21.64
22.24
21.75
-2.2%
Spreadsheet
10.77
11.32
10.77
11.32
5.1%
Weighted Average -25.0%
20.4%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-3
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38AK007501
1099G00176
Split System
1999
Concord City Hall
SS-2
19.0 Am|
208 Volt
0.90
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
CoilConditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
2.80 Amps Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.70 Fan quantity:
10.5
10.5
5.71
5
6%
9.8
1.22
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.1 kW
0.41 kW
0.00 kW
6.53 kW - Condensing side only
5.7% Performance Degradation
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
5.0
5.0
5.7
5.7
5.35
0.9
0.1
0.95
0.05
0.05
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
205
207
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
90%
91%
6
87
7.30
17.8 2
18.9 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
89 F
112 F
64 in
28 in
12.4sq-ft
3995
2.26 kg/sec
8.27 Tons
17.11 EER
0.70 kW/Ton
0 0.55
8 0.99
305 K
318 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-2
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38AK007501
1099G00176
Split System
1999
Concord City Hall
SS-2
19 Ami
208 Volt
0.895
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
CoilConditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
2.8 Amps Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
10.5
10.5
5.71
5
0%
10.4
1.15
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
6.1 kW
0.41 kW
0.00 kW
6.53 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
Average
ft/sec
10.0
10.2
10.1
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
205
207
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
95%
90%
6
92
6.90
17.4 2
18.8 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
91 F
112 F
64 in
28 in
12.44sq-ft
7541
4.27 kg/sec
14.25 Tons
28.99 EER
0.41 kW/Ton
0 0.55
9 0.99
306 K
318 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-2
-------
Concord City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-2 Summary
10.5 BTU/W-h
3995 CFM (Measured)
5.71 tons
6.00 tons
12.44 sq-ft
9.84 pre 10.39 post
Equipment age
5 Years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
87
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
92
ST-SH
39
40
El
90%
95%
Cl
91%
90%
EER
10.4
10.4
kW
6.95
6.56
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
89
91
exhaust
112
112
Cond Air
AT(K)
12.8
11.7
kW
5.8
5.9
(kg/sec)
2.26
4.27
tons
8.27
14.25
EER
17.11
28.99
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
6.95
5.39
10.4
6.56
5.25
10.4
CU
5.8
8.27
17.11
5.9
14.25
28.99
Lit
6.17
5.92
11.50
6.42
5.83
10.91
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
112%
91%
90%
102%
90%
95%
CU/Lit
94%
140%
149%
92%
244%
266%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
94%
100%
100%
99%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
7.3
5.2
9.4
6.7
5.1
10.0
CU
6.1
8.0
15.6
6.0
13.9
27.8
Literature
6.53
5.71
10.48
6.53
5.71
10.48
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
112%
91%
90%
102%
90%
95%
CU/Lit
94%
140%
149%
92%
244%
266%
SA/CU
120%
65%
61%
111%
37%
36%
Predicted/SA
104%
-
99%
Predicted/CU
63%
-
35%
Predicted/
Original
94%
-
99%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
10.4
10.4
9.4
10.0
5.6%
Condenser Test
17.11
28.99
15.61
27.88
78.6%
Spreadsheet
9.84
10.39
9.84
10.39
5.6%
Weighted Average 33.3%
33.9%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-2
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38ARZ007-501
4302G30009
Split System
2002
Concord City Hall
SS-1
19.1 Ami
208 Volt
0.78
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
0.90 Amps
208 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
0.75
0.25
0.1
0.75
X
X
5.7%
0
1
5
12
25
0
25
50
100
0
25
50
25
35
45
60
0
10
25
50
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.3 kW
0.26 kW
0.00 kW
5.59 kW - Condensing side only
Performance Degradation
11.8
11.8
5.48
2
6%
11.4
1.06
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
2
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.1
3.7
4.1
4.9
4.700
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6.25
0
0
0
0
2.5
0
18.75
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
208
204
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
96%
92%
6
85
6.90
18.1 1
16.4 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
87 F
96.5 F
in
in
29.2 sq-ft
8234
4.66 kg/sec
7.04 Tons
16.25 EER
0.74 kW/Ton
9 0.51
3 1.00
304 K
309 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-1
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
38ARZ007-501
4302G30009
Split System
2002
Concord City Hall
SS-1
19.1 Ami
208 Volt
0.775
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
0.9 Amps Power supply:
208 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
11.8
11.8
5.48
2
0%
12.0
1.00
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 0
Nameplate Voltage: 0
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.3 kW
0.26 kW
0.00 kW
5.59 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
2
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
6.6
7.2
6.8
6.8
6.9
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Efficiency
209
206
t Measurment
10
74
54
50
85
103%
92%
6
88
6.50
17.3 1
15.5 3
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
89 F
100 F
0 in
0 in
29.20 sq-ft
12001
6.80 kg/sec
11. 88 Tons
29.09 EER
0.41 kW/Ton
7 0.48
2 1.00
305 K
311 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-1
-------
Concord City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
SS-1 Summary
11.8 BTU/W-h
8234 CFM (Measured)
5.48 tons
6.00 tons
29.20 sq-ft
1135 pre 12.01 post
Equipment age
2 Years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
85
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
88
ST-SH
35
37
El
96%
103%
Cl
92%
92%
EER
12.4
13.0
kW
6.31
5.94
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
87
89
exhaust
96.5
100
Cond Air
AT(K)
5.3
6.1
kW
5.2
4.9
(kg/sec)
4.66
6.80
tons
7.04
11.88
EER
16.25
29.09
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
6.31
4.86
12.4
5.94
4.96
13.0
CU
5.2
7.04
16.25
4.9
11.88
29.09
Lit
4.90
5.28
12.93
5.11
5.39
12.65
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
129%
92%
96%
116%
92%
103%
CU/Lit
106%
133%
126%
96%
220%
230%
SS/Lit
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
102%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
7.2
5.0
11.3
6.5
5.0
12.1
CU
5.9
7.3
14.8
5.4
12.1
27.1
Literature
5.59
5.49
11.77
5.59
5.49
11.77
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
129%
92%
96%
116%
92%
103%
CU/Lit
106%
133%
126%
96%
220%
230%
SA/CU
121%
69%
76%
121%
42%
45%
Predicted/SA
100%
-
94%
Predicted/CU
77%
-
42%
Predicted/
Original
96%
-
102%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
12.4
13.0
11.3
12.1
7.3%
Condenser Test
16.25
29.09
14.79
27.07
83.0%
Spreadsheet
11.35
12.01
11.35
12.01
5.8%
Weighted Average 43.8%
498.1%
34.9%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
SS-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
50TJQ006
1399G20943
Package Heat Pump
1999
Concord City Hall
RTU-3
15.4 Amps
230 Volts
0.81
1.50 Amps
230 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.90
Nameplate Voltage: 208
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.0 kW
0.24 kW
0.86 kW
5.20 kW-Condensing side only
12.0
12.0
5.23
5
7%
11.1
1.08
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
X
0.8
0.2
0.1
1
X
X
6.7% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
Average
ft/sec
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP1
10
74
54
50
85
99%
94%
5
86
5.80
F
F
%
%
Tons
kW
F
F
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-3
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
50TJQ006
1 399G20943
Package Heat Pump
1999
Concord City Hall
RTU-3
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
CoilConditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
12.00
12.0
5.2261
5
0%
11.9
1.01
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
15.4 Amps Power supply:
230 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.81 Compressor quantity:
1 .5
230
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.9
Nameplate Voltage: 208
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Amps Power supply:
Volts Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.0 kW
0.24 kW
0.86 kW
5.20 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
-
-
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP 1
10
74
54
50
85
104%
101%
5
88
5.60
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
F
F
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-3
-------
Concord City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-3 Summary
12.0 BTU/W-h
- CFM (Measured)
5.23
5.00 tons
- sq-ft
11.14
Equipment age
5 Years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
86
EWB
62
El
99%
Cl
94%
EER
13.0
kW
6.06
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
deg F
exhaust
Cond Air
AT(K)
kW
(kg/sec)
tons
EER
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
88
62
104%
101%
13.2
5.85
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
6.06
4.69
13.0
5.85
5.00
13.2
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
4.58
4.99
13.08
4.69
4.95
12.66
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
132%
94%
99%
125%
101%
1 04%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
100%
100%
93%
100%
100%
99%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
6.9
4.9
11.9
6.5
5.3
12.5
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
5.23
5.23
12.00
5.23
5.23
12.00
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
132%
94%
99%
125%
101%
1 04%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
94%
-
89%
Predicted/CU
-
Predicted/
Original
93%
-
99%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
13.0
13.2
11.9
12.5
5.1%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
11.1
11.9
11.14
11.88
6.6%
Weighted Average 25.3%
NA
33.2%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-3
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
50TJQ006
1399G20939
Package Heat Pump
1999
Concord City Hall
RTU-2
15.4 Amps
230 Volts
0.81
1.50 Amps
230 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.90
Nameplate Voltage: 208
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.0 kW
0.24 kW
0.86 kW
5.20 kW-Condensing side only
12.0
12.0
5.23
5
6%
11.2
1.07
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
it
X
0.7
0.3
0.5
0.5
X
X
6.2% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
Average
ft/sec
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP1
10
74
54
50
85
98%
91%
5
86
5.60
F
F
%
%
Tons
kW
F
F
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-2
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
50TJQ006
1399G20939
Package Heat Pump
1999
Concord City Hall
RTU-2
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
CoilConditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
12.0
12.0
5.23
5
0%
11.9
1.01
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
15.4 Amps Power supply:
230.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.8 Compressor quantity:
1.5 Amps Power supply:
230.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.9 Amps
Nameplate Voltage: 208.0 Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.0 kW
0.24 kW
0.86 kW
5.20 kW-Condensing side only
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
X
X
0.0% Performance Degradation
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
-
-
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP 1
10
74
54
50
85
104%
98%
5
89
5.80
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
F
F
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-2
-------
Concord City Hall
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-2 Summary
12.0 BTU/W-h
- CFM (Measured)
5.23
5.00 tons
- sq-ft
11.19
Equipment age
5 Years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
86
EWB
62
El
98%
Cl
91%
EER
12.8
kW
5.85
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
deg F
exhaust
Cond Air
AT(K)
kW
(kg/sec)
tons
EER
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
89
62
104%
98%
13.0
6.06
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
5.85
4.54
12.8
6.06
4.83
13.0
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
4.58
4.99
13.08
4.75
4.93
12.45
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
128%
91%
98%
128%
98%
1 04%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
100%
100%
93%
100%
100%
99%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
6.7
4.8
11.8
6.7
5.1
12.5
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
5.23
5.23
12.00
5.23
5.23
12.00
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
128%
91%
98%
128%
98%
1 04%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
95%
-
90%
Predicted/CU
-
Predicted/
Original
93%
-
99%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
12.8
13.0
11.8
12.5
6.1%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
11.2
11.9
11.2
11.9
6.1%
Weighted Average 30.6%
NA
30.7%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-2
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
50TJQ006
NA
Package Heat Pump
1999
Concord City Hall
RTU-1
15.4 Amps
208 Volts
0.90
1.50
208
0.70
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.90
Nameplate Voltage: 208
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Amps
Volts
Amps
Volts
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.0 kW
0.22 kW
0.86 kW
5.21 kW-Condensing side only
12.0
12.0
5.23
5
2%
11.7
1.03
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
3-Phase
1.73
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1
1
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
2.0% Performance Degradation
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Number
1
2
3
4
5
Average
ft/sec
-
-
0.9
0.35
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assistar
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP 1
10
74
54
50
85
98%
93%
5
81
5.80
F
F
Tons
kW
F
F
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-1
-------
Post-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
Carrier
50TJQ006
NA
Package Heat Pump
1999
Concord City Hall
RTU-1
15.4 Amps
208.0 Volts
0.9
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coll Condlton
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
1.5 Amps Power supply:
208.0 Volts Phase adjustment:
0.7 Fan quantity:
Evaporator fan data (If applicable)
Full load Amps: 5.9 Amps
Nameplate Voltage: 208.0 Volts
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coll Assessment
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
5.0 kW
0.22 kW
0.86 kW
5.21 kW - Condensing side only
12.0 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
12.0 Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
5.23 tons
5 years
0% (% degraded)
11.9 Btu/W-hr
1.01
3-Phase
1.7
1
1-Phase
1
1
1-Phase
1.0
1.0
0.0% Performance Degradation
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
-
-
-
FLUKE METER MEASURMENTS
Y-measurment
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
HVAC Service Assistan
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
Input Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Wdth
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
t Measurment
COMP1
10
74
54
50
85
100%
92%
5
87
5.60
F
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
F - K
F - K
in
in
sq-ft
kg/sec
Tons
EER
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-1
-------
Concord City Hall RTU-1 Summary
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Nominal Unit Capacity
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
12.0 BTU/W-h
- CFM (Measured)
5.23
5.00 tons
- sq-ft
11.65
Equipment age
5 Years
Test Date
24-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
81
EWB
62
El
98%
Cl
93%
EER
14.0
kW
6.06
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
NA
exhaust
NA
Cond Air
AT(K)
NA
kW
NA
(kg/sec)
NA
tons
NA
EER
NA
Post Adsil Measurements
16-Jun
87
62
100%
92%
12.9
5.85
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data® Field Conditions
SA
6.06
4.74
14.0
5.85
4.57
12.9
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Lit
4.30
5.10
14.25
4.64
4.97
12.87
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
141%
93%
98%
126%
92%
100%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SS/Lit
100%
100%
97%
100%
100%
99%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data @ARI
SA
7.4
4.9
11.8
6.6
4.8
12.0
CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Literature
5.23
5.23
12.00
5.23
5.23
12.00
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
1 41 %
93%
98%
126%
92%
100%
CU/Lit
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SA/CU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Predicted/SA
-
99%
-
97%
Predicted/CU
-
-
-
Predicted/
Original
-
97%
-
99%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
14.0
12.9
11.8
12.0
2.0%
Condenser Test
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Spreadsheet
11.7
11.9
11.7
11.9
1.9%
Weighted Average
10.2%
NA
9.7%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC City Hall
RTU-1
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
50TJQ009-601
4598G30510
Package HP
1998
Concord Admin
RTU-5
7.2 Al
460 V(
0.74
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
0.70 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 2.60
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
0.85
0.15
0.1
0.05
0.9
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
8.5 kW
0.45 kW
0.84 kW
8.93 kW - Condensing side only
5.7% Performance Degradation
11.3
11.3
8.41
6
6%
10.5
1.14
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
5
Average
ft/sec
9.4
9.8
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.8
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
495
495
t Measurement
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
104%
99%
3.5
93
4.00
13.6 3
12.9 6
1 0.46
4 1.00
4 compressors 2
F stages. All 4 on durring
F CU test; two on during
% SA test
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
96 F
103 F
72 in
36 in
36.0 sq-ft
21168
11. 99 kg/sec
13.33 Tons
16.84 EER
309 K
313 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC Admin Building
RTU-5
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
50TJQ009-601
4598G30510
Package HP
1998
Concord Admin
RTU-5
7.2 Al
460 V(
0.74
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
0.7 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 2.6
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
8.5 kW
0.45 kW
0.84 kW
8.93 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
11.3
11.3
8.41
6
0%
11.1
1.08
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
10.7
11.5
10.7
10.7
10.9
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
495
495
t Measurement
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
104%
96%
3.5
93
4.00
13.6 3
12.9 6
1 0.46
4 1.00
Both circuits on
F durring both tests
F
%
%
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
93 F
106 F
72 in
36 in
36.0 sq-ft
23544
13.33 kg/sec
27.54 Tons
34.79 EER
307 K
314 K
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC Admin Building
RTU-5
-------
Concord Admin RTU-5 Summary
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
11.3 BTU/W-h
21168 CFM (Measured)
8.41 tons
3.50 tons
36.00 sq-ft
10.50 pre 11.08 post
Equipment Age
6 Years
Test Date
13-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
93
Post Adsil Measurement
17-Jun
93
EWB
62
62
El
104%
104%
Cl
99%
96%
EER
11.4
11.4
kW
9.62
9.62
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air
inlet
96
93
deg F
exhaust
103
106
Cond Air
AT(K)
3.9
7.2
kW
9.5
9.5
(kg/sec)
11.99
13.33
tons
13.33
27.54
EER
16.84
34.79
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
9.62
7.46
11.4
9.62
7.24
11.4
CU
9.5
13.33
16.84
9.5
27.54
34.79
Lit
8.29
7.54
10.92
8.29
7.54
10.92
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
116%
99%
104%
116%
96%
1 04%
CU/Lit
115%
177%
154%
115%
365%
319%
SS/Lit
102%
102%
93%
102%
102%
98%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
10.2
8.2
11.7
10.2
7.9
11.7
CU
10.1
14.6
17.4
10.1
30.2
36.0
Literature
8.79
8.26
11.28
8.79
8.26
11.28
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
116%
99%
104%
116%
96%
104%
CU/Lit
1 1 5%
177%
154%
1 1 5%
365%
319%
SA/CU
101%
56%
67%
101%
26%
33%
Predicted/SA
89%
-
89%
Predicted/CU
60%
-
29%
Predicted/
Original
93%
-
98%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
11.4
11.4
11.8
11.8
0.0%
Condenser Test
16.84
34.79
17.45
36.04
106.6%
Spreadsheet
10.50
11.08
10.50
11.08
5.6%
Weighted Average
0.0%
373.0%
19.6%
HVAC Data Sheet
Page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC Admin Building
RTU-5
-------
Pre-Adsil HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
50TJQ01 2-601
4598G30510
Package HP
1998
Concord Admin
RTU-7
8.6 Al
460 V(
0.66
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
0.70 Amps
460 Volts
0.70
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.40
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.70
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
1
0.8
0.2
1
0.05
0.25
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
9.0 kW
0.45 kW
1.09 kW
9.43 kW - Condensing side only
2.7% Performance Degradation
10.6
11.8
9.31
6
3%
11.3
1.06
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
10.0
9.6
9.3
9.4
9.6
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Volts
493
493
t Measurement
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
82%
85%
5
92
6.20
Amps kW PF
19.4 2
18.4 8
0 0.21
9 0.98
4 compressors 2
F stages. All 4 on durring
F CU test; two on during
% SA test
%
Circu
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
92 F
112. 5 F
61 in
43 in
36.4 sq-ft
20929
11. 85 kg/sec
38.61 Tons
42.51 EER
t2
90%
89%
5 Tons
92 F
6.00 kW
306 K
318 K
HVAC Data Sheet
page 1 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC Admin Building
RTU-6
-------
Post-Ad si I HVAC Data Sheet and EER Calculation
Manufacturer:
Model Number:
Serial Number
Equipment Type:
Year Manufactured:
Location
Tag
Compressor Data
Running load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Power factor:
Carrier
50TJQ01 2-601
4598G30510
Package HP
1998
Concord Admin
RTU-7
8.6 Al
460 V(
0.656
Condensing Fan Data
Full load Amps:
Nameplate Voltage:
Adjust FLA to RLA:
0.7 Amps
460 Volts
0.7
Evaporator fan data (if applicable)
Full load Amps: 3.4
Nameplate Voltage: 460
Adjust FLA to RLA: 0.7
Calculated compressor load:
Calculated condensing fan load:
Calculated evaporator fan load
Total calculated load for equipment:
Assumptions
Condenser Coil Assessme
Overall Unit Condition
New
Average
Fair
Poor
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
Clean
Dirty
Clogged
Plugged
Fin Condition
Like New
Some Bent
Smashed
Dull/rough
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Fin-Tube Attachment
Like New
Corrosion
Some Loose
Many Loose
Tubes
Clean Cu
Corrosion
Pitting
Leaks
nt
X
1
1
X
X
Published EER:
Calculated EER:
Nominal Capacity:
Age
Coil Conditon
Present Condition EER
kW/ton
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Compressor quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
Power supply:
Phase adjustment:
Fan quantity:
9.0 kW
0.45 kW
1.09 kW
9.43 kW - Condensing side only
0.0% Performance Degradation
10.6
11.8
9.31
6
0%
11.6
1.03
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
Btu/W-hr (CU Only)
tons
years
(% degraded)
Btu/W-hr
Amps
Volts
3-phase
1.73
2
1-Phase
1
2
3-Phase
1.73
1
CU Fan CFM Calculation
Measurement
Number
1
2
3
4
Average
ft/sec
11.3
11.1
8.4
11.1
10.5
FLUKE METER MEASUREMENTS
Y-measurement
Phase Volts Amps kW PF
1
2
3
Delta Measurement
Phase
1 to 2
2 to 3
TOTAL
HVAC Service Assista
Input SEER
RAT
SAT
RAH
SAH
El
Cl
nput Cap
OAT
Predicted KW
Ambient
CU Exhaust
Coil Length
Coil Width
Area
Measured Fan CFM
Air Mass Flow
Capacity
Efficiency
Volts
495
495
t Measurement
10
74
54
50
85
Circuit 1
92%
92%
5
93
6.00
Amps kW PF
13.6 3
12.9 6
1 0.46
4 1.00
Both circuits on
F durring both tests
F
%
%
Circu
Tons
F
kW
CU Capacity Estimates
93 F
112 F
61 in
43 in
36.4 sq-ft
22897
12.97 kg/sec
39. 15 Tons
49.45 EER
t2
90%
89%
5 Tons
92 F
5.90 kW
307 K
318 K
HVAC Data Sheet
page 2 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC Admin Building
RTU-6
-------
Concord Admin
EER at ARI Conditions
Condensing unit CFM
Capacity at ARI
Capacity used for SA
Coil Area
Predicted EER =
RTU-7 Sumary
11.8 BTU/W-h
20929 CFM (Measured)
9.31 tons
10.00 tons
36.43 sq-ft
11.32 pre 11.62 post
Equipment Age
6 Years
Test Date
13-May
HVAC Service Assistant
OAT
92
Post Adsil Measurement
17-Jun
93
EWB
62
62
El
86%
91%
Cl
87%
91%
EER
9.0
9.4
kW
11.36
11.08
Physical Power and Capacity measurments
Cond Air, deg F
inlet
92
93
exhaust
112.5
112
Cond Air
AT(K)
11.4
10.6
kW
10.9
9.5
(kg/sec)
11.85
12.97
tons
38.61
39.15
EER
42.51
49.45
Condensing Unit Summary - Ambient Conditions
OAT
Pre-Adsil
Post-Adsil
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Power (kW)
Capacity (Tons)
EER
Test Data
SA
11.36
7.50
9.0
11.08
7.77
9.4
CU
10.9
38.61
42.51
9.5
39.15
49.45
Lit
9.85
8.62
10.50
9.95
8.58
10.35
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
115%
87%
86%
1 1 1 %
91%
91%
CU/Lit
111%
448%
405%
95%
456%
478%
SS/Lit
90%
100%
106%
90%
100%
109%
Condensing Unit Summary - ARI Conditions
Test Data
SA
12.1
8.1
9.1
11.7
8.4
9.7
CU
11.6
41.7
43.0
10.0
42.5
50.8
Literature
10.51
9.31
10.63
10.51
9.31
10.63
Percent Difference
SA/Lit
115%
87%
86%
1 1 1 %
91%
91%
CU/Lit
111%
448%
405%
95%
456%
478%
SA/CU
104%
19%
21%
117%
20%
19%
Predicted/SA
124%
-
-
117%
Predicted/CU
26%
-
-
22%
Predicted/
Original
106%
-
-
109%
EER Changes
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
ARI Adjusted
Pre-Adsil EER
Post Adsil EER
Change
Service Assistant
9.0
9.4
10.2
10.8
5.8%
Condenser Test
42.51
49.45
47.97
56.62
18.0%
Spreadsheet
11.32
11.62
11.32
11.62
2.6%
Weighted Average 58.1%
180.4%
26.5%
HVAC Data Sheet
page 3 of 3
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Concord, NC Admin Building
RTU-6
-------
-------
Appendix G
Energy Savings Calculations
-------
Appendix G- Energy Savings Calculations
Increase the Life and Performance of Condenser Coils
The outdoor environment can be harsh on heat transfer surfaces. The application of the Adsil
corrosion inhibitor will decrease the environmental damage to the condenser coils. As such, the life
and performance of the coils is increased. This protection is easily applied to equipment.
Facility: SEQLArea
150 Units
ECP Savings:
Total ECP Savings:
ECP Cost:
Payback:
371.67 Electric Demand kW
0.00 Equivalent Demand kW
Demand Cost Savings
Steam System Therms
Steam System Cost Savings
Other Fuels Therms
Water kgal
Wastewater kgal
Maintenance Cost Savings
$36,915
$165,425
4.48
Total Annual Cost Savings
yrs (including maint savings)
461,440
1,574
$36,915
Electric Energy kWh
Electric Energy MMBtu
Electric Energy Cost Savings
Steam System MMBtu
Other Fuels MMBtu
Other Fuels Cost Savings
Water kgal Cost Savings
Wastewater kgal Cost Savings
1,574 Total Annual MMBtu Savings
4.48 yrs (excluding maint savings)
Calculations
Assumptions: This recommendation is applied in the following instances:
1) New equipment
2) Existing equipment with evidence of minor environmental damage
3) Equipment with five years of useful life remaining
Use blended utility rate of $0.08 per kWh
The protective corrosion inhibitor is MicroGuard (TM) product from Adsil (TM)
Charlotte area has 1644 cooling degree days (CDD) per NOAA
Full-load equivalent operating hours = FLEOH= 0.8*CDD
Decrease in EER is assumed to be both an increase in power consumption
and capacity degradation
Savings to heat pumps during the heating season are not included
Average EER=9.0
Average EER gain =12.3%
1644
1,315
$0.000
$0.08000
0%
HVAC System Data
Condensing Unit Data from:
Condensing Unit Consumption:
Calculated EER:
CDD
FLEOH
Demand Cost per kW
Energy Cost per kWh
Demand Diversity
SEQL Area
3393.33 kW
10.1 Btu/W-hr
Nominal Capacity: 2545.0 tons
Present Condition EER: 9.0 Btu/W-hr
kW/ton= 1.33
EER after coil applications 10.11
kW/ton after coil applications 1.19
Demand Consumption= 3021.67
Appendix G
Page 1 of 2
-------
Facility:
SEQL Area
150 Units
Current Run-time Adjustment Factors
Night Setback: 1.000
FLEOH Conversion: 0.800
Proposed Run-time Adjustment Factors
Night Setback: 1.000
FLEOH Conversion: 0.800
Excess Capacity:
Weekend Setback:
Cooling Set Point:
Excess Capacity:
Weekend Setback:
Cooling Set Point:
1.000
1.000
72.00 Degrees F
1.000
1.000
72.00
Degrees F
Run-time Estimates
Current condensing unit:
Proposed condensing unit:
1,242
1,242
kW
Current 3393.333
Proposed 3021.668
Savings ^^7~
hours - annually
hours - annually
kWh
4,212,989
3,751,548
461,440
Installation Costs
Nominal capacity: 2,545
Cost associated to install coating (parts & labor): $65
Total project cost: $165,425
tons
per ton (total installed cost)
(vendor quotation)
Appendix G
Page 2 of 2
-------
-------
Appendix H
Spreadsheet EER Degradation
-------
TABLE H-1 SPREADSHEET EER DEGRADATION COMPARED WITH SERVICE ASSISTANT FOR ALL VALID TESTS
Site Unit Age
Concord Admin RTU-7 6
Concord City Hall RTU-2 5
RTU-3 5
SS-1 2
SS-2 5
SS-4 11
Iredell Health Center RTU-1 12
RTU-13 12
RTU-14 12
RTU-3 7
Locust City Hall SS-2 7
Monroe Aquatic Center RTU-1 7
RTU-2 7
RTU-9 7
RTU-10 7
RTU-13 2
RTU-15 2
RTU-16 4
YTC Bid D RTU-1 12
YTC-Hood Center
RTU-6 13
RTU-7 13
RTU-8 12
RTU-9 4
HP-1 12
YTC - Library Unit 1 13
YTC Student Center RTU-25 13
YTC Student Services HP-1 13
YTC Truck School SS-1 15
Average
Capacity
9
5
5
5
6
2
3
3
5
3
3
7
7
12
8
21
7
5
4
24
29
24
18
23
3
5
17
5
7
9
Overall Unit Condition
New
1-9 yrs
1
10-1 5 yrs
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
>15 yrs
Coil Cleanliness
Coated
0.7
0.9
1
1
1
Clean
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.75
0.95
0.8
1
0.9
0.9
1
1
1
0.7
1
1
0.9
0.9
1
1
0.75
Dirty
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.1
0.05
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
1
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.25
Clogged
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.75
Plugged
0.1
Fin Condition
Like New
1
0.5
0.95
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.5
1
0.9
1
Some Ben
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.02
0.02
0.8
0.05
0.1
0.4
0.5
1
0.1
Smashed
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.25
Dull/rough
0.25
0.5
1
0.75
0.05
0.2
1
1
1
1
0.1
0.5
0.75
0.75
1
0.5
0.5
0.75
Corroded
Pitted
Flaking
Overall Grade
7.00%
7.50%
9.00%
9.25%
9.60%
10.65%
15.25%
7.50%
1 1 .3%
9.00%
10.0%
4.00%
4.00%
21.70%
4.00%
9.50%
3.20%
3.20%
30.00%
24.00%
23.00%
24.75%
6.50%
9.00%
12.00%
9.00%
17.75%
10.25%
Service assistant
6% 0.541308
6% 32.0%
5% 26.4%
7% 40.0%
6% 31 .7%
1% 2.5%
0.0%
5% 14.5%
6% 33.1%
2% 5.8%
5% 16.1%
4% 31 .5%
5% 39.4%
15% 182.2%
11% 83.0%
28% 584.8%
4% 28.3%
6% 29.3%
35% 138.7%
1% 24.0%
0.0%
38% 922.9%
7% 122.7%
13% 291.2%
10% 27.1%
17% 81.4%
11% 185.2%
7% 34.1%
20% 146.4%
9% 84.4%
11.49% 10.31%
Appendix H
Page 1 of 2
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Spreadsheet EER Degradaion
-------
Visual vs Service Assistant Degradation Approximation (Valid Tests)
5.00% -- — —
Appendix H
Page 2 of 2
EPAAdsil Evaluation
Spreadsheet EER Degradaion
-------
TABLE
Overall Unit Condition
Coil Cleanliness
Site
Concord Admin
Concord City Hall
Locust City Hall
Monroe Aquatic Center
YTC Bid D
YTC Truck School
Average
Unit
RTU-7
RTU-2
RTU-3
SS-1
SS-2
SS-2
RTU-1
RTU-2
RTU-9
RTU-1 0
RTU-1 3
RTU-1
SS-1
Capacity
9
5
5
5
6
3
7
7
12
8
21
4
9
102
Age
6
5
5
2
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
4
15
New
1 -9 yrs
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10-1 5 yrs
>15 yrs
1
Coated
0.7
0.9
1
Clean
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.75
1
1
1
0.7
0.75
Dirty
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
1
0.25
Clogged
0.7
Plugged
Like New
1
0.5
0.95
0.9
0.9
0.5
Some Ben
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.8
0.1
Smashed
0.2
Dull/rough
0.25
0.5
1
0.75
0.05
0.1
0.5
0.75
Overall Grade
7.00%
7.50%
9.00%
9.25%
9.60%
10.0%
4.00%
4.00%
21.70%
4.00%
9.50%
29.00%
11.25%
10.45%
Service assistant
5.8%
6.1%
5.1%
7.3%
5.6%
5.4%
4.2%
5.3%
15.3%
10.9%
28.2%
34.7%
9.2%
11.00%
54%
32%
26%
40%
32%
16%
32%
39%
182%
83%
585%
139%
84%
13.14%
Appendix H
Page 1 of 2
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Spreadsheet EER Degradation
-------
Visual vs Serice Assistant Degradation (Literature Valid Tests)
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
o
'ra
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00% - -
0.00%
Unit
Appendix H
Page 2 of 2
EPA Adsil Evaluation
Spreadsheet EER Degradation
-------
-------
Appendix I
Statistical Model
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 42.000 0.160 0.009
IMPORT successfully completed.
42 cases and 2 variables processed and saved.
SYSTAT Rectangular file P:\EAT\TUCKER\small projects\lowrey\EER Change\allsaprepost.SYD,
created Fri Sep 03, 2004 at 10:05:18, contains variables:
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
SYSTAT Rectangular file P:\EAT\TUCKER\small projects\lowrey\EER Change\allsaprepost.SYD,
created Fri Sep 03, 2004 at 10:05:18, contains variables:
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 6
POSTADSILE _ 35 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 4 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre for Service Assistant results.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 1 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
42
0.079
0.380
0.060
0.080
0.111
0.049
0.015
0.099
IMPORT successfully completed.
All condensing data
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERIMPROVEM 29.000 0.150 0.096
Data are normal. Use t test.
One-sample t test of EERIMPROVEM with 29 cases; Ho: Mean = 0.000
Mean= 0.366 95.00% Cl = 0.173 to 0.558
SD= 0.505 t= 3.898
df= 28 Prob= 0.001
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 2 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
o
O
EERIMPROVEM
EERIMPROVEM
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
0.
3
0
6
8
3
4
5
29
239
1.52
0.23
0.36
0.55
0.17
0.09
0.50
IMPORT successfully completed.
All Spreadsheet results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 42.000 0.141 0.034
% Change results not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EXPORT successfully completed.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 3 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 0
POSTADSILE _ 41 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
42
0.000
0.176
0.051
0.058
0.072
0.044
0.007
0.044
Use valid data only. All temperatures. Service Assistant results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 30.000 0.215 0.001
Data are not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 4 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 2
POSTADSILE _ 28 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 4 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
30
0.079
0.380
0.063
0.093
0.130
0.056
0.018
0.099
Valid tests, all temperatures, condensing results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 20.000 0.098 1.000
Data are normal. Use t test.
One-sample t test of EERCHANGE with 20 cases; Ho: Mean = 0.000
Mean= 0.326 95.00% Cl = 0.140 to 0.512
SD= 0.397 t= 3.670
df= 19 Prob= 0.002
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 5 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
O
O
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
EERCHANGE
OOO O OO
OOIOOO OOP
1.5
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
20
0.239
1.132
0.263
0.326
0.512
0.140
0.089
0.397
Valid tests, all temperatures, Spreadsheet results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 30.000 0.165 0.036
Results not normally distributed. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 6 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
IMPORT successfully completed.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 0
POSTADSILE _ 29 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 4 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
30
0.000
0.176
0.057
0.061
0.078
0.043
0.009
0.047
Valid results, temperatures previously tested in the literature. Service Assistant results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 15.000 0.235 0.026
Data are not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 7 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 1
POSTADSILE _ 14 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 2 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ 1'
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
15
0.079
0.347
0.058
0.091
0.148
0.033
0.027
0.104
Valid results at temperatures previously tested in the literature. Condensing tests.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 10.000 0.126 1.000
% change data are normal. Use t test.
One-sample t test of EERCHANGE with 10 cases; Ho: Mean = 0.000
Mean= 0.356 95.00% Cl = 0.143 to 0.568
SD= 0.297 t= 3.788
df= 9 Prob= 0.004
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 8 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
O
O
5
4
1
0
-0.5
O
0.0 0.5
EERCHANGE
1.0
Post Adsil improvement is statistically significant.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
10
0.073
0.830
0.327
0.356
0.568
0.143
0.094
0.297
Valid results, temperatures previously tested in the literature. Spreadsheet results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 15.000 0.254 0.010
Data not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 9 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 0
POSTADSILE _ 15 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases .,-
I 0
Minimum QQQ7
Maximum _ „_„
u.i /D
Median Q Q56
Mean Q06Q
95% Cl Upper Q Q8g
95% Cl Lower Q Q31
Std. Error Q^
Standard Dev Q^2
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 10 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 42.000 0.160 0.009
IMPORT successfully completed.
42 cases and 2 variables processed and saved.
SYSTAT Rectangular file P:\EAT\TUCKER\small projects\lowrey\EER Change\allsaprepost.SYD,
created Fri Sep 03, 2004 at 10:05:18, contains variables:
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
SYSTAT Rectangular file P:\EAT\TUCKER\small projects\lowrey\EER Change\allsaprepost.SYD,
created Fri Sep 03, 2004 at 10:05:18, contains variables:
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 6
POSTADSILE _ 35 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 4 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre for Service Assistant results.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 1 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
42
0.079
0.380
0.060
0.080
0.111
0.049
0.015
0.099
IMPORT successfully completed.
All condensing data
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERIMPROVEM 29.000 0.150 0.096
Data are normal. Use t test.
One-sample t test of EERIMPROVEM with 29 cases; Ho: Mean = 0.000
Mean= 0.366 95.00% Cl = 0.173 to 0.558
SD= 0.505 t= 3.898
df= 28 Prob= 0.001
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 2 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
o
O
EERIMPROVEM
EERIMPROVEM
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
0.
3
0
6
8
3
4
5
29
239
1.52
0.23
0.36
0.55
0.17
0.09
0.50
IMPORT successfully completed.
All Spreadsheet results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 42.000 0.141 0.034
% Change results not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EXPORT successfully completed.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 3 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 0
POSTADSILE _ 41 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
42
0.000
0.176
0.051
0.058
0.072
0.044
0.007
0.044
Use valid data only. All temperatures. Service Assistant results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 30.000 0.215 0.001
Data are not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 4 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 2
POSTADSILE _ 28 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 4 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
30
0.079
0.380
0.063
0.093
0.130
0.056
0.018
0.099
Valid tests, all temperatures, condensing results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 20.000 0.098 1.000
Data are normal. Use t test.
One-sample t test of EERCHANGE with 20 cases; Ho: Mean = 0.000
Mean= 0.326 95.00% Cl = 0.140 to 0.512
SD= 0.397 t= 3.670
df= 19 Prob= 0.002
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 5 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
O
O
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
EERCHANGE
OOO O OO
OOIOOO OOP
1.5
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
20
0.239
1.132
0.263
0.326
0.512
0.140
0.089
0.397
Valid tests, all temperatures, Spreadsheet results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 30.000 0.165 0.036
Results not normally distributed. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 6 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
IMPORT successfully completed.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 0
POSTADSILE _ 29 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 4 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than Pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
30
0.000
0.176
0.057
0.061
0.078
0.043
0.009
0.047
Valid results, temperatures previously tested in the literature. Service Assistant results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 15.000 0.235 0.026
Data are not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 7 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 1
POSTADSILE _ 14 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE 2 °-
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ 1'
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
15
0.079
0.347
0.058
0.091
0.148
0.033
0.027
0.104
Valid results at temperatures previously tested in the literature. Condensing tests.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 10.000 0.126 1.000
% change data are normal. Use t test.
One-sample t test of EERCHANGE with 10 cases; Ho: Mean = 0.000
Mean= 0.356 95.00% Cl = 0.143 to 0.568
SD= 0.297 t= 3.788
df= 9 Prob= 0.004
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 8 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
O
O
5
4
1
0
-0.5
O
0.0 0.5
EERCHANGE
1.0
Post Adsil improvement is statistically significant.
EERCHANGE
N of cases
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Mean
95% Cl Upper
95% Cl Lower
Std. Error
Standard Dev
10
0.073
0.830
0.327
0.356
0.568
0.143
0.094
0.297
Valid results, temperatures previously tested in the literature. Spreadsheet results.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov One Sample Test using Normal(0.00,1.00) distribution
Variable N-of-Cases MaxDif Lilliefors Probability (2-tail)
EERCHANGE 15.000 0.254 0.010
Data not normal. Use nonparametric test.
IMPORT successfully completed.
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 9 of 10
-------
File: EER Change Stat Results.doc
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Results
Counts of differences (row variable greater than column)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE 0 0
POSTADSILE _ 15 _ 0_
Z = (Sum of signed ranks )/square root(sum of squared ranks)
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE OOQ °'
POSTADSILE
Two-sided probabilities using normal approximation
PREADSILEE POSTADSILE
PREADSILEE
POSTADSILE
Post Adsil EER significantly greater than pre.
IMPORT successfully completed.
EERCHANGE
N of cases .,-
I 0
Minimum QQQ7
Maximum _ „_„
u.i /D
Median Q Q56
Mean Q06Q
95% Cl Upper Q Q8g
95% Cl Lower Q Q31
Std. Error Q^
Standard Dev Q^2
Appendix I
Statistical Model
Page 10 of 10
-------
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-453/R-05-003
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Evaluation of Savings from the Application of
Adsil in the NC/SC Charlotte Area
5. REPORT DATE
Nov. 5, 2004
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Tom Lowery, PE Principal
Chris Melton, PE Senior Engineer
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Prepared for EPA by Mactec, 404 SW 140th Terrace, Newberry, FL
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT NO.
4D-6453-NTLX
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Technology evaluation
Nov. 2003 - Nov. 2004
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/200/04
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This report contains the results of a study in the Charlotte, NC/Rock Hill, SC region to evaluate the benefits of a new coating called
Adsil. It was conducted as part of the SEQL Project (Sustainable Environment for Quality of Life), an integrated environmental
improvement project in the 15-county NC/SC region surrounding Charlotte, NC. Previous studies have shown that, when Adsil is
applied to air conditioner units, it can bring the efficiency of that unit virtually back to that of a new unit, as well as prevent age-
related efficiency loss, saving electrical power and early replacement costs. The ability to model expected energy savings with
Adsil is beneficial and transferable to other communities. Energy savings reduce costs, limit the need for new generating capacity,
and could under certain circumstances benefit air quality. The report includes two tools:
1) A degradation prediction tool (spreadsheet-based) calibrated against actual EER measurements and found to be very accurate in
predicting the EER degradation of a population of HVAC units in the SEQL area.
2) An energy savings projection tool created based on the results of this study. This tool can be adapted by facility owners and
operators to estimate their energy savings, dollar savings, and potentially avoided pollution emissions as a result of the application
of Adsil to air-cooled HVAC equipment.
17.KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Technology evaluation of energy efficiency
technology
Energy efficiency
Air quality
Air conditioning
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
61
20. SECURITY CLASS (Page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division
Research Triangle Park, NC
Publication No. EPA-453/R-05-003
November 2004
Postal information in this section where appropriate.
-------