United States
     Environmental Protection
     Agency
                                                    RESEARCH PROJECT
                                            National Risk Management Research Laboratoi
                                                   Water Supply and Water Resources Division
                                                    Treatment Technology Evaluation Branch
THE ROLE OF MICROBIAL PROCESSES IN THE OXIDATION AND REMOVAL OF ARSENIC
FROM DRINKING WATER
         '    '-
                                                                IMPACT STATEMENT
                                                   The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently
                                                   reduced  the drinking water  standard  for  arsenic  (As)
                                                   in  water  from  0.05  to  0.01  milligrams  (mg)/Liter (L)
                                                   (10 micrograms (|ig) /L).  This reduction was prompted by
                                                   new health effects research, which concluded that extended
                                                   human exposure  to this element can cause severe illnesses
                                                   (including  various types of cancers) at much lower levels
                                                   than previously believed. The recent revision to the arsenic
                                                   standard has required many new water treatment systems
                                                   to apply treatment processes. Findings from this study will
                                                   further enable EPA to provide subject matter expertise and
                                                   guidance on best available technologies for the removal of
                                                   arsenic from drinking water.

                                                   BACKGROUND:
The oxidation state of arsenic, As(lll) or As(V), is very important in water treatment, the latter can be removed more
easily. Source waters that contain As(lll) generally require the use of a  strong oxidant  such as free chlorine or
permanganate to oxidize the arsenic early in the treatment process. Oxygen is not an effective As(lll) oxidant, but it is
however, effective at oxidizing Fe(ll). Aeration is  commonly incorporated into iron removal processes  particularly in the
Midwest. For such systems that also contain As(lll) in their source water, they may need to  add a stronger oxidant
before aeration to achieve the desired arsenic removal efficiency. The oxidation of As(lll) by bacteria is well known, but
never reported to be important in drinking water treatment systems. In water treatment, the application of microbial
processes is not a widely accepted practice in the United States. The lack of acceptance is due largely to the negative
perception of using bacteria to clean water when at the same time  a  goal of water treatment is to remove and kill
bacteria. Secondly, the concern that  pathogenic bacteria could be harbored in the filters and regularly shed  to the
finished water always exists.
One iron removal treatment plant (oxidation and filtration) in  Ohio has observed effective iron (2.3 mg/L) and arsenic
(46 |ig/L) removal, and regularly meets the  new arsenic standard. The majority of arsenic in the raw water is in the
reduced  As (III) form  (37 |ig/L). The interesting observation is that arsenic is removed without the addition of a strong
chemical oxidant such as free chlorine to convert As (III) to the more easily removable As (V) form. Aeration is used to
oxidize iron in the source water. Preliminary investigations suggested that oxidation of As (III) takes place within the
filters by microorganisms which could explain the greater than expected  arsenic removal. If microbiological oxidation of
As (III) does occur within the filters, taking advantage of the natural microbiological population in the source water can
avoid the need, costs, and possible complications associated with adding a strong oxidant to the water.
      National Risk Management Research Laboratory
      Water Supply and Water Resources Division

-------
DESCRIPTION:

The objectives of this study were to 1) document the removal of arsenic in a full-scale water treatment plant, 2) conduct
bench-scale studies to identify the mechanism(s) responsible for arsenic removal, 3) identify the role of bacteria, if any,
on arsenic removal, and 4) conduct pilot-scale studies to  identify the  most effective and rapid  method to regain
microbial activity within the filters.

EPA GOAL: Goal #2 - Clean & Safe Water; Objective 2.1.1- Water Safe to Drink
ORD MULTI YEAR PLAN: Drinking Water (DW), Long Term Goal - DW-2 Control, Manage, and Mitigate Health Risks

EXPECTED OUTCOMES AND IMPACTS:

Water utilities, states and engineers will better understand nitrification problems and approaches to reduce nitrification in
distribution systems.

OUTPUTS:

Current and future outputs  of the project will consist of published papers, peer-reviewed journal articles.

RESOURCES:

EPA Arsenic Research: http://www.epa.Rov/nrmrl/wswrd/dw/arsenic/
NRMRL Drinking Water Research: http://www.epa.Rov/ORD/NRMRL/wswrd/dw/index.html
NRMRL Treatment Technology Evaluation Branch: http://www.epa.ROv/ORD/NRMRL/wswrd/tteb.htm

CONTACTS:
Darren Lytle, Principal Investigator - (513) 569-7432 or lytle.darren@epa. gov
Steven Doub, MediaRelations - (513) 569-7503 ordoub.steven@epa.gov
Michelle Latham, Communications - (513) 569-7601 orlatham.michelle@epa.gov
      National Risk Management Research Laboratory
      Water Supply and Water Resources Division
                                                             www.epa.gov/nrmrl
EPA/600/F-10/008
February 2010

-------