&EPA
                            United States
                            Environmental Protection
                            Agency
                                 Robert S. Kerr Environmental
                                 Research Laboratory
                                 Ada, OK 74820
                            Research and Development
                                 EPA/60Q/M-91/QQ9  Mar. 1991
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH   BRIEF
                  Solubility, Sorption and Transport of Hydrophobic
                        Organic Chemicals in Complex Mixtures


                               P.S.C. Rao1, LS. Lee1 and A.L Wood8
Introduction

Environmental contamination problems commonly involve
wastes consisting of complex mixtures of chemicals. The
behavior of these mixtures has not been well understood
because the primary chemodvnamlc properties (e.g.,
solubility, sorptlon, transport) of organic chemicals have
usually been characterized in aqueous solutions which are
simple in composition relative to many waste mixtures fpynd
at or near disposal/spill sites. Typically, laboratory studies
have focused on ertemodynamtcs of single solutes in water or
In dilute electrolyte solutions.

The research summarized in this report focuses on the
effects which organic cosolvents have on the sorption and
mobility of organic contaminants. This work was initiated in
an effort to improve our understanding of the environmental
consequences associated with complex mixtures and to
enhance our ability to deal with these consequences in a
technically responsible manner,

Specific objectives of the project were to:

(1) measyre solubility and sorption for selected organic
   chemicals in complex solvent mixtures consisting of
   mixtures of  organic cosolvents and water; and

(2) utilize isocratte- and gradient-elution techniques to
   characterize the Impacts of organic cosoivents on the
   transport of hydrophobia organic chemicals In soils and
   aquifer media,

The results of this work have application to the definition,
prediction and remediation of sol and groundwater conta-
mination problems. Since an increase in the concentration of
organic cosoivents is reflected in decreased sorption, organic
contaminants at waste disposal/spill sites are liKely to be
present at higher concentrations In pore water. Decreased
sorption, In turn, will lead to organic contaminants being
transported further than predicted from aqueous-based

'Soil Sd. Dept.. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; *R.S. Kerr
Env. Res. Lab., U.S. EPA, Ada, OK 7482Q
                      transport data.  While this manifestation of cosolvency can
                      exacerbate environmental problems, judicious application of
                      the principles of cosolvancy can assist in alleviating existing
                      problems. For example, removal of contaminated soils from
                      a disposal/spill site and extraction with solvent mixtures (so-
                      called "solvent washing*) is one remediation technique that is
                      receiving considerable attention. The results presented here
                      should be of direct use in selection of the appropriate solvent
                      mixtures to extract the otganic contaminants of interest,

                      Background

                      We define here complex mixtures as those systems having
                      multiple solutes and multiple solvents. The solute mixtures of
                      interest might consist of various combinations of nonpolar,
                      hydraphobic organic chemicals (HOCs); hydrophoblc,
                      tonizable organic chemicals (HIOCs); and Ionic organic
                      chemicals (IOCS). The solvent may be a mixture of water
                      and one or mors organic cosolvents. Cosolvents that are
                      soluble in water in all proportions will be referred to as
                      eomptetely-misetble organic solvents (CMQSs),  Other
                      solvents which have only a finite solubility in water will be
                      referred to as partially-miscible organic solvents (PMGSs),
                      Two types of solvent mixtures are of interest: (I) solvents
                      consisting of water and eosofvents in a single, homogeneous
                      tfqyid phase; and (II) solvents containing water and
                      cosolvents that form at least two distinct liquid phases. In
                      this report, the first type will be referred to as mixed solv&nts,
                      while the second type wilt be designated as muKiphasic
                      solvents,

                      In recent years, several researchers  have recognized the
                      need to study the ehemodynamlcs of complex mixtures; and
                      coordinated efforts were Initiated to develop theoretical
                      approaches and    bases. This work has    funded
                      primarily by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
                      the U.S. Department of Energy {DOE), and the U.S. Air
                      Force (USAF),  Research funded by DOE, conducted
                      primarily at Battelle PNL, has focused on competitive sorption
                      by soils and clays from  HIOC mixtures found In energy
                      wastes (Felice et al., 1985; Zachara et a!., 1987), With
                      funding from EPA, researchers at the University of Florida
                      hava also studied the sorptlon from mixtures of HOCs and
                                                                               Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
HIOCs (selected to represent the so-called Appendix VIII
compounds) that are commonly found at hazardous-waste
land-treatment facilities (Rao et al,, 1986), EPA has also
funded much of the work completed to date on the effects of
cosolvents on chemodynarnics of organic contaminants
(Yalkowsky, 1985, 1987; Rao et al., 1985; Rao and Lee,
1987; Nkedi-Kizza et at, 1985,1987,1989; Woodbum et
Guissepi-EIIle, 1988; Walters et al., 1989). Sorptlon of jet
fuel constituents from liquid and vapor phases has been
examined with funding from the U.S. Air Force (Mclntyre and
deFur, 1985; Raoet al., 1988),

The log-linear cosolvency model and the UNIFAC model are
among the theoretical approaches that have been used to
examine cosolvent effects on solubility and sorption. The log-
linear cosolvency model (Yalkowsky and Roseman, 1981) is
based on the central assumption that the logarithm of the
solute solubility in a mixed solvent is given by the weighted-
average of the logarithms of solubilities in the component
solvents in the mixture; the weighting coefficient is taken to
be the volume fraction of each solvent component. Thus,
        tog Sm = £ f,  log S,
(1)
where S is solubility (mg/L), f Is volume fraction of the
solvent, and the subscript m denotes mixed solvent while i
denotes a specific solvent component. Note that averaging
the logarithms of solubilities is equivalent to averaging the
free energies of solution in different solvents in the mixture.
The UNIFAC model (Fredenslund et al., 1975) Is a group-
contribution scheme for calculation of the activity coefficients.
This model Is based on the UNIQUAC model {Abrams and
Prausnitz, 1975) and the so!ution-of-group concept (Wilson
and Deal, 1982),  In this model, a mixture of different
chemicals is treated as a mixture of the functional groups
constituting the components in solution.

In many cases, the UNIFAC model may be preferred over the
log-linear model because: (i) it has a more sound theoretical
basis, (ii) activity coefficients In mixtures can be calculated
given only pure component data,  and  (Hi) all possible
interactions among the components in the mixture are
explicitly considered. A limitation of the UNIFAC model,
however, is that although the group interaction parameters
required to estimate the solute activity coefficients are
continuously reviewed and updated, their values are not
available for a number of systems of interest hare.

An extensive amount of data has shown that in binary mixed
solvents, HOC solubility increases and sorption decreases in
a log-linear manner as the volume fraction of the organic
cosolvent increases (Rao et al., 1985; Nkedi-Kizza et al.,
1985; 1987; Woodburn et al., 1988; Fu and Luthy, 1986a,
19865;  Rubino and Yalkowsky, 1985; 1987a, 1987b, 1987c).
These experimental findings are consistent with the
predictions of both the UNIFAC model and the log-linear
cosolvency model. The successful extension of the log-linear
model to describe solubility and sorption  in binary, ternary
and quinary mixed solvents has also been demonstrated
(Rao and Lee, 1987; Rubino et al.. 1984; Rubino and
Yalkowsky, 1985; Yalkowsky and Rubino, 1984),

In contrast to the large amount of data on solubility and
sorption of HOCs in mixed solvents with completeiy-mtscibie
organic cosolvents (e.g., alcohols), similar data for mixed
solvents Involving partially-misclble organic cosolvents were
essentially nonexistent prior to this study. Only limited data
for solubility and sorption of HIOCs in mixed solvents are
available (Fu and Luthy, 1986a; Zachara et al., 1988),
Cosolvent Impacts on kinetics of phase partitioning have
been examined, though mostly in a qualitative manner
(Freeman and Cheung, 1981; Nkedi-Kizza et al,, 1989;
Walters et al, 1989).

Laboratory studies were conducted during this project to
collect solubility data, and these      were used to evaluate
two theoretical approaches (the UNIFAC model and the log-
linear model).  Based on the solubility data collected,
modifications to the log-linear model ware proposed to
improve its predictive capabilities.  Batch equilibration and
column displacement techniques were used to characterize
equilibrium and nonequllibrium sorption of HOCs and HIOCs
from mixed solvents. These data were used to compare
cosolvent effects on solubility and sorption and to assess
cosolvent interactions with the sorbent which impact
equilibrium and kinetics of sorption. Partitioning of HOCs into
water from complex mixtures of liquids was examined In
order to provide data essential lor estimating solubilization
and release of aromatic constituents from fuels such as
gasoline, diesei, and jet fuel,  and from such wastes as coal
tar and creosote.  Retention of several HOCs from mixed
solvents by synthetic sorbents (reversed-phase
chromatography supports) and a surface soil was measured
at several temperatures to characterize the energetics of
HOC sorption and to better understand the sorptive
mechanisms.

in the following sections, a brief summary of our findings in
each of these areas is presented.  Details can be found In
several publications listed in Appendix A and Appendix B.

Cosolveney

The effects on solubility and sorption (hence, on transport) of
organic chemicals upon addition of one or more organic
cosoivents to an aqueous solution  are defined here as
cosolvency, The alterations in solubility might result from the
following interactions; solute-solute, solute-cosolvent,
cosolvent-cosolvent, and water-cosolvent. For nonpolar
solutes and at low concentrations of polar/ionizable solutes,
solute-solute interactions are likely to be negligible and are
not considered further.  The work presented here focuses on
the other interactions listed above.

Sorption  of organic solutes, especially HOCs,  is inversely
related to solubility.  Thus, an Increase in solubility resulting
from the addition of a cosolvent leads to a proportional
decrease in sorption. In addition to the interactions listed for
solubility, sorption is influenced by solute-sorbent, and
sorbent-cosolvent interactions. Both solute and cosolvent
interactions with the sorbent were investigated in this project,

A convenient measure  of cosoivency is the cosotvency
power, defined here on the basis of the inherent ability of a
cosolvent to produce an alteration  in the solubility or sorption
upon addition of a cosolvent.  Behavior In a pure (neat)
aqueous solution and a pure (neat) organic solvent will serve
as the basis for quantifying the cosolvency power.

-------
The eosolvency power (os c) of a cosolvent for a solute
(subscript s) may be defined as:
                                         (2)
where S is the solute solubility (mg/L) in neat cosolvent
(subscript c) or pure water {subscript w). Since HOC solubility
in organic solvents is larger than that in water, 0gc > 0.
Larger values of as c indicate a greater sofubilizinig power of
the solvent for a specific soiute,

1 may be expected that with decreasing polarity of the
cosolvent, o  e wlil increase for hydrophobia solutes.  Thus,
0   values stiould be inversely related to various indices of
sowent polarity (e.g., dielectric constant, Rohrschneider
polarity Index, ET(30), and others).  Rubins and Yalkowsky
(1987a, 1987b) have investigated such relationships for
soiubilization of pharmaceutical drugs. The inverse relation-
ship between os  and ET(30) for solubiiization of anthracene
In several solveras is shown In Figure 1, for a given solvent,
os e values should increase with increasing hydrophobteity of
the solute, Morris et al. (1988) have shown that a values are
indeed positively correlated with log K^ values.  Two
examples of such a relationship are shown in Figures 2A
and 2B, It is evident from the data in Figures 1 and 2 that
the cosoivency power (os c) values can be estimated given
specific properties of the solute and the solvent. Data
presently available for several solute-solvent systems can be
effectively utilized to estimate os e for other systems.
                                                            The measured HOC solubility profiles in binary solvent
                                                            mixtures generally deviate from the expected tog-linear plot,
                                                            primarily because of water-cosolvent interactions. The extent
                                                            of such deviations may then be taken as an index for the
                                                            magnitude of such interactions. The observed cosotvertcy
                                                            power in a binary mixed solvent is defined here for solubility
                                                            as,
                                                            and for sorption as,
                         °S,m « !°9fK8
                                                                                                    (3)
                                                                                                    (4)
                                                            where cs m is the exoerimentalfy-measured vaiue of
                                                            cQsolvency power, S is the measured HOC solubility {mg/L),
                                                            and K is the  measured sorption coefficient (mL/g), with the
                                                            subscripts m and w denoting a binary mixed solvent and
                                                            water, respectively.

                                                            For operational convenience, in calculating o values in eqs
                                                            (3) and (4) we use solubility or sorption values measured in
                                                            50% (v/v) solvent mixture for CMOS-water systems and
                                                            saturated solutions for PMOS-water systems. This choice
                                                            also precludes problems associated with mutual miscibiiity of
                                                            organic coslvents (e.g., methanol, acetone) with liquid solutes
                                                            (e.g., benzene, toluene).  When eosolverrf-water interactions
                                                            are significant, the predicted (eq 2)  and measured {eqs 3 or
                                                            4) eosolvency powers are not equivalent.  We may therefore
              5.6
              5.4
              5.2
          0)
          O    5
          CL

          O  4.8
          C
          0)

          |  4'6

          O
          a  4.4
              4.2


                4
                            ctloxane

                      trlchtoro»then»i

                         chlorobenzeno
                                                   m©thylena chloride
MTBE ^ nitrobenzene
      m 2-butanone
                  30
                                                               dlmBthylsuItoxIdo
                                                                          Isopropanol
                               35
  40
    45

ET(30)
50
55
60
Figure 1. Inverse relationship between cosolveney power (o$ c) and solvent polarily index E-^30).
        (1988).
                                                                                    for £^30) were taken from Reichardt

-------
                                                            K
Ftg«8 2,  Direct relationship       eosolvsncy      {0S c) and      octanol-wrator
        acetone-water mixtures.
                                                                                           nwthanol-waief, and (8)
define for solubility,
                 *.e
and for sorptiort,
             >apo,
                   9.C
                                       (6)
where the empirical constants a and $ account for water-
eosolvent and sortwnt-cosolvent interactions, respectively,
that     to deviations from the expected iog-Iinear behavior,
Note that p = l Implies the absence of water-cosoivsnt
interactions, and o <* 1  suggests that the sorber>t-cosol¥ent
interactions are negligible.  Work done during this project
aimed at examining the deviations from the tog-linear
cosolvency model, and to provide a prtanomenoiogfcai
for tf» empirical constants a and p.

             and

The solubilities of several HOCs were measured in binary
mixtures (water-CMOS, water-PMOS) and in ternary
mixtures (wale?-CMOS-PMOS). Severn! aromatic
hydrocarbons (al! solids)          in      studies in order
to minimize specie solute-solvent and scluts-solyta
interactions. The easoiverts      permitted measurement of
cosoivency over a            of solvent properties. The
          HOC solubiitzation profiles     compared with the
           of the log-linear      and the UNIFAC
[refs. 2r 12,          A; ref, 7,          3  }.
OUT       Indicate that PMOSs can       significantly
increase the solubility of HOCs, provided that the PMOS
concentration is about 1% (v/v) or Iarg«r, In an         or
predominantly aqueoys solvent, PMOSs such as o-crasol
and aniline which have strong polar functional groups (e.g.,
-OH, -NO4) would exhibit considerable cosolvency,  Nonpolar
PMOSs, such as trfchloroethylene (and other haloalkenes)
and toluene (and other aromatic hydrocarbons), are not
         to show            eosotveney {< 20% increase).
Only In the presence of a CMOS can the concentration of
      PMOSs be sufficientfy high to have a measurable
impact on HOC solubility.

Preliminary                  that the greater eosolvsney of
polar-PMOSs        to that of rwnpoiar-PMQS can be
attributed, in      part, to water-PMOS interactions arising
from the      moieties such as -OH and -NOr  The
presence of strong polar functional groups has a dua! effect:
(i)         solubility of the PMOS is higher,
relatively high cosoteenl concentrations can be
(fi} the likelihood of watsr-PMOS Interactions is

Modifications to the tog-linear                    to
account for             interactions  [mf.  I,          B J,
In        3A    38, the          solubility prairies for
anthracene in CMOS-water iacstone-water) and Irs PMOS-
waier {bulanone-water} mixtures are           with
         by the         iog-i-near        While
agreement between the         and          solubility
       is encouraging, further work to understand the

-------
                                        Anthracene Solubility

                                      Acetone/Water Mixtures
                                                               *   Observed

                                                               - - -  Loglinear

                                                                   Modified Log-!inear
                                  I Aqueous-rich
                                4 '-  Phase
Butanone/Water Mixtures        B

                          >
                                                           2 Phases
                                                                        ,,••''   Organic
                                                                                -rich
                                                                               Phase
                                                     C , - , i>  Observed

                                                     	  Loglinaaf

                                                     	  Modified Log-linear
                                            0.2        0,4        0.6        0,8         1

                                            Volume Fraction Cosolvent
figure 3. Predicted and measured solubility of anthracene in binary solvent mixtures: (A) acetone-water, and (B) butanone-water.  Note fiat
        butanona is misdble with water only up to fe • 0.25, while acetone Is misdbte with water in all proporttons.
specific nature of the cosofvent-water Interactions is
recommended.

Results similar to those for HOCs have been observed for
ionizable organic chemicals (Yalkowsky, 1985,1986;
Yalkowsky and Roseman, 1981; Fy and Luthy, 1i86a), As
solute polarity increased relative to the solvent, Yalkowsky
and Roseman (1981} observed that eosolvency curves
became increasingly more parabolic in shape until an inverse
relationship was actually Deserved (i.e., a decrease In
solubility with cosolvent additions). Sych behavior was
explained on the basis of the solute-solvent interactions.

HOC Partitioning from Complex Solvent Mixtures

An understanding of solubility (or partitioning) of HOCs from
complex liquids is essential for predicting contaminant
release from mixtures such as gasoline, coal tar, and
       creosote. The solubility of a given component In a mixture
       may be altered by other components that may act as
       cosolutes or cosolvents. We investigated partitioning of
       various aromatic compounds into water from several
       gasolines and from known mixtures of aromatic and aliphatic
       solvent mixtures [mf, 9, Appendix A J, The purposes of these
       studies wsre to assess: (!) the variability In gasoline-water
       partitioning of aromatic hydrocarbon constituents arising from
       variability in gasoline composition (source variations); (ii) the
       application of Raoulfs law for the partitioning of aromatic
       hydrocarbons from complex solvent mixtures; and (iii) the
       cosolvent affects from oxygenated additives (e.g., methanoi,
       ethanol, MTBE).

       Aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in water extracts of 31
       gasoline samples varied over an order of magnitude,
       reflecting the diversity in gasoline composition.  However, the
       fuel-water partition coefficients (K^) varied by less than 30%

-------
among these samples. HOC partitioning between water and
known mixtures of aromatic and aliphatic solvents was
measured and used to estimate the upper and lower bounds
of Kto values for more complex solvent mixtures such as
gasoline and diesal fuel.

Assuming that gasoline is an ideal mixture of solvents, the
following relationship can be derived:
log Kte = A - log S *

A = log [ 103 {6/MWJ J
                                       (7a)

                                       (7b)
where § and MW0 are the average liquid density (g/mL) and
molecular weight (g/mole), respectively, of the gasoline; and
S* Is the aqueous solubility (ug/mL) of a specific gasoline
component.  The observed inverse, log-log linear
dependence of K^ values on aqueous solubility (Figure 4)
could be well predicted by eq (7), These results suggest that
given the gasoline composition, reliable estimates of likely
concentrations in groundwater can be made.

CosoSvency and! Equilibrium Sorption

Satptlon of HOCs from Mlxod Solvents

Sorption of several  HOCs by two soils was measured from
mixed solvents containing CMOSs and/or PMOSs,  The utility
of the log-linear cosolvency model for predicting oosoivency
                                         was evaluated. The cosolvent effects on HOC solubility and
                                         sorption were compared In order to examine cosolvent-
                                         sorbeot interactions (I.e., estimation of 0 and P) [fofs, 1,3,
                                         Appendix A; mi 2, Appendix B ].

                                         As anticipated from the solubility studies, nonpolar- PMOSs
                                         (e.g., toluene, trichloroethytene) had small or no effect on
                                         HOC sorption. Sufficiently high concentrations of these
                                         PMOSs needed to measurably decrease HOC sorption could
                                         only be achieved when CMOS concentrations were high (ca.
                                         30% by volyme or larger). In contrast, the cosolvency of
                                         polar-pyOSs was sufficiently high to cause significant
                                         reduction in sorption in predominantly aqueous solutions;
                                         however, the measured cosolvency for sorption was different
                                         (usually higher) from that predicted from solubility data.  For
                                         example, sorption of anthracene by Eustis fine sand {organic
                                         carbon content of 0.39%) with increasing amounts of o-creso!
                                         was less than would be predicted based on measured
                                         solubilities  (i.e. a > 1) (Flgur® SA).  However, fluoranthene
                                         sorption measured in butanone-water mixtures (Figure SB)
                                         was greater than that predicted from solubility  measurements
                                         (i.e., a<1).

                                         A series of batch and column studies was performed to
                                         further Investigate the interactions of polar- PMOS (e.g., o-
                                         cresol, aniline, butanone, MTBE) with selected soils with a
                                         broad range of organic carbon contents [fdf, 2, Appendix B J.
                                         It was hypothesized that uptake of polar-PMGS by the
                                         sorbent organic matter decreased sorbent hydrophobiclty
       O
      o
       c
      •2
      S
      •c
      5,
      I
      7B
1,2,3'Trfmethylbenzene

      n-Propy/betizene

                Efftyflbenzene
                i
                !
        Xy/snes
                                      Toluene
                                              Benzene
  O  Measured Values

  ~  §5% Confidence Interval

 —  Ideal Line (eq, 7)

-3.5
                         -3
                    -2.5
                                           -2
-1,5
-1
-0.5
0
                                      Log                 Sw
 Figure 4.  Relationship between fuel-water partition coefficients (K^) and aqueous solubility ($*) for major gasoline constituents. The line shown is
         calculated assuming Raoulfs law to be applicable (eq 7).

-------
                                     Anthracene Sorption
                                   Cosolvency of o-Cresol
                                         Measured

                                         Reference
                                             0.04          0,08          0,12

                                                   Volume Fraction o-eresol
                                                    Flyorantnene Sorption
                                                   Cosoivency of Butanone
                            0,16
                                          0.05        0,1         0.15        0,2

                                                 Volume Fraction Butanone
                            0,25
Rgure 5. Cosolvency of (A) o-cresol on the solubility and sorpfcn of "C-anttracene in 50:50 dimeUTybutoxideWater mixtures, and (B) butanone
        on tie solubility and sorptton of 14C-antirae8ne.
resulting in reduced HOC sorptton by the soil. The
magnitude of such an effect would depend on the following
factors: (1) the polarity and functionality of the PMOS, which
determine the manner and the amount of sorption/yptake by
soil; (li) the hydrophobicfty of the solute,,as indicated by is
KM»> anc* W. ^9 hydrophobicfty of the sorbent, as indicated
by tts organic carbon content,

Energetics of HOC Sorptlon from Mixed Solvents

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) techniques
have been used to Investigate retention of hydrophobia
solutes In  soils and sediments (e.g., Veith et al, 1979; Swann
at al., 1981;  McCall et al., 1980; Szabo et a!., 199Qa, 1990b,
1990c). We conducted a series of RPLC studies to evaluate
the syitabllity of RPLC supports as experimental surrogates
for soils and sediments with high OG content. The retention
data collected at several temperatures during Isocratic,
Isothermal elution with binary mixtures of methanotAwater and
acetonitrile/water mobile phases ware used to assess
selected chromatographic models and to investigate the
mechanisms of hydrophobfc solute retention  in the presence
of mixed solvents [ret. 7, Appendix A; rets. 3,4,5,6,
Appendix B ],

Changes In chromatographlc retention factors (k) were
correlated with the following Indices of solute hydrophobiclty
and molecular topology:  oetarol-water partition coefficient

-------
(K  }, hydrophobia surface area |HSA), and first-order
molecular connectivity (1x); and with solvent Indices, sych as,
solvent surface tension (y) and dielectric constant index (I").
Also, the solvophoble model (Horvath et al, 1976) and the
entropy-enthalpy compensation model (Malander et al,,
1978)} were successfully applied to describe' the dependence
of solute retention on solvent composition and temperature,
Correlations obtained between solute retention factors and
various solute Indices, along with the thermodynamlc analysis
of the retention data using the entropy-enthalpy
compensation model showed that alkylbenzenes behaved
differently from the polyeycllc aromatic hydrocarbons and the
monofialobenzenes.  Such distinctive thermodynamlc
behavior ts Indicative of the differences in mechanisms of
retention of these compounds,

Sorptlon of four polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by Webster
sltty loam (OC = 3%) from a methanol-water mixture (30:70
vrv) at three temperatures was measured using batch
equilibration methods {/»/, 7, Appendix A ]. Results from a
thermodynarnic analysis of the sorptioo data were similar to
those obtained from the RPLC sypports.  This suggests that
mechanisms for sorption/retention of polycyclfc aromatic
hydrocarbons from methanol-water are similar for RPLC
supports and the Webster soil; however, comparable sorption
data for alkylbenzenes on soils have not been measured,

Sorptlon of HOCs from Multlphaslc Solvents

For HOC sorption in muftiphasic solvents distribution between
the three phases (soil, water, PMOS) can be described by
the soil-water and PMOS-water partition coefficients if HOC
sorptlon on soil Is assumed to occur only through the
aqueous phase (i.e., no direct solute transfer between the
PMOS and soil) and i the dissolved PMOS has a negligible
cosolvency effect, Sorption of the herbicide diuron (a
substituted urea) by Webster sirty loam and a  Eustis sand
was measured from aqueous electrolyte solutions (0.01 N
CaCy saturated with a PMOS, and from several biphasle
solvents. The PMOSs used were n-octanoi, toluene, p-
xytene, and TCE, which are considered nonpolar PMOSs [ref.
3, Appendix A ]. The sorptlon data are shown in Figure §,
These results suggest that even If present In a separate liquid
phase, nonpolar PMOSs did not Influence HOC sorption for
these soils. As previously discussed, nonpolar PMOSs had
little effect on HOC sorption due to their limited aqyeoys
solubilities,

CosoSveney and Transport

IsocratSc Button

Mlsctole displacement experiments were conducted to
measure the transport of three HOCs (naphthalene,
phenanthrene, anthracene), a substituted  urea herbicide
(diuron), and an lonizable compound (pentachlorophenot)
with methanol-water mixtures as the mobile phase {refs.
4,5,6,8,10, Appendix A  ],  The objectives  of these studies
were: (I) to utilize the eolumn-measyred retardation factors at
several cosolverrt contents to estimate equilibrium sorption
constants  (K, mL/g) lor aqueous systems, and (li) to
determine sorption rate  coefficients (kg, hr1} to        the
Impacts of cosolvents on sorptlon kinetics.

Solute retardation factors were determined from
breakthrough curves measured for HOC displacement with
metrtanol-water mixtures.  The column- and batch-measured
K values were generally in agreement at all cosoivent
contents, Indicating that cosolvency power can be estimated
using either technique,  Extrapolation of the mixed solvent
data to fe « 0 (I.e., aqueous solutions) yielded K values that
were generally equal to or larger (by a factor of ^ 2) than the
batch-measured aqueoys K values (Figure 7). It was
suggested that the extrapolated values were, In fact, more
                                                                           —  w/phase

                                                                              w/phase

                                                                              w/phase

                                                                              w/phase  j
                                                    4           6

                                              Solution Cone. (ug/mL)
 Figure 6, Equilibrium isotherms for sorptlon and diyron herbicide by Webster ami Eustis soils from biphasie solvents and from
         aqueous solutions saturated with several PMOS.

-------
                    1.5

                      1

                    as

                      o

                    -1
                 W
                 O
                    0,8

                    0,6'

                    0.4

                    0,2


                      °
                        ; -'- Mtttott Dt»p!«s*ff«»nt
                   "°-s;. KM,
                   -0,2 r
                   =0.4
•   1.51

    IT

  0,5 r

    0 '

| -0 S ;

   -1
                       0    0.1   0.2   0.3   0.4   0.5   0.6   0       0.2      0,4     0,8      0.8
                          Dluron
      , PentacMorop/mio/
    2 «-,
    1r
   -2 t-
                       [ y » -4.01 I * }

                          **• OJ3
                       0     0.1    0,2    0.3     0.4    0.5    0     0.2    0.4    0.8    0.8     1

                                             Volume Fraction
Figure 7, Com'p»8on of batch- and column-measured K      far       at          phenanttvene, Aufoo, and                as a
               of ¥Oltffne
                     maasursmenf of sorption for strongly
hydrophobte solutes     subject to several artifacts {ret. 5,
         A],

The validity of the log-linear model for describing the Impact
0} cosolvents on the mobility of organic solutes Is confirmed
by the batch and the column data. For transport, this model
can be written In terms of the commonly used retardation
factor (R) as follows:

         ln(Rm-1).1n(Rw-1)-aowfc     (8)

where the          m and w                      in
      solvents     water, respectively;    other
are as       previously.
The column                   to
        during HOC             with       soi¥ents [refs,
6,8,10, Appendix A  j.  The bieontinuum sorption model
     to the                       curves to
sorplion     constants fkg).  In this model, sorption Is
            as a two-step        initial
(Instantaneous) sorption is foitowacJ by a slower, diffusion-
                   towards equilibrium; k2 Is the rate
constant lor the                    et at,, 1990), A fog-
linear         in h_ was noted with increasing volume
fraction cosolvent p ) {Figure 8), Implying      sorption
kinatles In mixed solvents. This relationship was expected
      on the existence of a log-log, inverse relationship
between K and Kj and log-linear, inverse relationship
          K and fc. The                      for the
  measured log k- vs. fc     were In agreement with
  Independent estimates       on simple empirical eqyations.
  AJso, the measured kz values in aqueous solutions compared
  well with the estimates       on extrapolation of the mixed-
  solvents data, lending further support to the log-linear model
  ft     proposed that sorption kinetics are controlled by
  sorbate diffusion within the sorbent organic matter; the
          of a cosolvent        to after the conformation of
  the polymeric matrix of the organic matter, hence, the rate of
  solute diffusion [rets.  4,5.6,          A }.



                     wtih HOC transport in mixed
       used time-invariant                   (I.e.,
  elutton). From a        point of view, environmental
                        involving
         a constantly                 phase. Thus, 8 is
  importan? to           in* baftavtor of contaminants
            of        cosofvent composlfion. Therefor©, ws
            the utility of        §rad»nt-eiutlon
  chramatograpriy      Jar          HOC
       under such conditens [ret, 11, Appendix A },

          HOCs were         through laboratory soil
  columns ysing         isocratic- and gradisnt-slutlon
  chrornatography techniques.  The mobile phase consisted of
  binary mixtures of water and methane!  or acetonltrlle. First,
  Isoeratie elutlons were used to confirm the log-linear

-------
W
            1.8


            1.4


            1.3


            1.2


            1.1


              1


            0.9


            0.*



            0.4




            0.2
             Naphthalene
                                  logy- 1.67 x* 0.87

                                       r*-0.9S
                       0.1
                                  0.2
                                            0.3
           -0.2
           -0.4
           Phenanthrerts
                                         tog y-2.10 x- 1.20;
                                        !      r*« 0,97
                   0.4
                              O.S
                                         0.8
                                                    0.7
  0


-0.1


-0,2


-0.3


-0,4


-0,5


-O.g
                                                                       0.2
                                                                                           0,8
Diuron
                                                                                   logy 1.24 x-0.89

                                                                                        t'» 0.88
                                                                       0.1
                                                                                 O,2
                                                                                            8.3
                                                                                                      0.4
                                             Volume Fraction Methanol
Figure 8. Relationship between sorption rats coefficient (kg.hr"1} and volume fractal eosolvent for sorpfon of several HOCs by Eustts soil from
        malhanol-water mixtures.
functionality between solvent composition and the retention
(actor, k (equivalent to R-1).  Second, retention factors were
measured for elutlons with several linear solvent gradients.
Third, the following equation, adapted from gradtent-eluflon
theory, was used to predtet observed R values:
                                            (9)
                                 e
where R Is the retardation factor (dimensionless) measured
for a specified gradient elution, v is average pore-water
velocity (cm/mln), og c is the eosolveney power, b Is the slope
of the linear solvent gradient (mirr1){i.e., the constant rate at
which the fraction cosolvent content Is changed), L is the
column length (cm), p Is the soil bulk density fg/cm3), e is the
volumetric liquid content (cm'/cm*), and K, is the sorption
coefficient (mUg) value at the initial fraction cosolvent when
the gradient elution is initiated. The sorption and cosolveney
parameters for this model were measured independently
from batch or isocratfc elution data.

In general, the agreement was good between measured and
predicted capacity factors (Flgor® 9). These results suggest
that gradient-elation techniques and theory developed from
                                                    reversed-phase chromatography are also ysefyl for
                                                    investigating eosolvent effects on HOG sorption and transport
                                                    in soils and aquifer media.

                                                    Practical Applications of Project Findings

                                                    Magnitude of Cosolvent Effects

                                                    A vartety of organic cosolvents may be expected at and near
                                                    waste disposal sites, especially If codlsposal of a number of
                                                    wastes had been practiced. However, protocols for site
                                                    Investigations usually do not call for monitoring of organic
                                                    eosolvents In groundwater. Ste-spectfic Information on
                                                    concentrations and types of cosolvents that may be present
                                                    can be surmised only ff waste composition Is known.  Thus,
                                                    estimating the magnitude of eosolvent Impacts in enhancing
                                                    solubility and decreasing sorption/retardation is often difficult.
                                                    Although direct field-scale evidence for cosolveney Is lacking,
                                                    anecdotal evidence Irani site investigations suggests thai
                                                    organic cosolvents are present and may have contributed to
                                                    facilitated transport of organic contaminants at waste
                                                    disposal facilities.

                                                    This study was aimed at developing the necessary data base
                                                    from laboratory studies and theoretical approaches that can
                                                    be used in evaluating the likely magnitude of cosolvent
                                                        10

-------
             2.4
             1.8
                  Borden Aquifer
                     * Dlurw
                     A Anthr»c»n»

                     O f"yr««*

                   Eusf is Soli
        TJ
         ©
        «»•*
         O
        ""5
         9
                     A Anthracene

                                             0,8                          1.8
                                                                   k
                                           2,4
                  of         and                                  (k) fee            of                       so!
        column with             mixtures.
effects,  Our     and model calculations suggest that
solubility enhancement for most organic contaminants Is
likely to be small (< 20% increase) as long as cosolvent
concentrations in pore water are < 2% by volume {or about
20,000 rog/L).  Thus,                   of champ-dynamic
         are to be          only in      proximity to a
        sits (La., the "near-f»W*              high
              of           are likely. With increasing
        from the site, cosolvent       should diminish in
proportion to decreasing cosofvent concentrations.

Partially-rritecto'e coso'vents (e.g., MTBE, o-creso!,
have greaser cosotvencv               to
                  (e.g., rnsthanc!, ethanol acetone} and as
a      they should be         to                 or
         retafdaiion to  the            a! much
concentrations. Usually equivalent         in retardation
may be noted with a partially-miscibte organic solvent at
concentrations 2 to 4 times     than that of a eomptetely-
mlscibte organic solvent Properties, such as high
solubily, of the polar-PMOS that       them to
cosoivaney      than nonpolar-PMOS also      them to ba
           and to ha» a grealw mobility in
aquifers. Tfim,                       of polar-PMOSs
     be         at                      from
                                                     as
alcohols, are generally not       by      and they can
readily teach with water, Htnce, cosolvent       of CMOSs
and polar-PMOSs may be of concern in the lar-flekf regions
as well,



Our                 Raoult's law can be     to
                erf                                in
            in        wrth mtiti-componsnt
            (NAPLs)     as                  fuel.
Even though           are               mixtures, the
                  from           with
is           sufficiently      to be          for most
                    Equilibrium or
of a fuel constituent in groundwater, Cwt (mg/L), cart 130
         as follows:

                C   «F C   / K  1                 l'10^

      C,, Is the             ieng/L} of the constituent in the
fuel and Iv, is the foei-wattr                       can
be          using eq {?),

For                                          as
         (a CMOS) or nrwtrtyl-tertiafy butyl      (a
                                                      11

-------
PMOS), solubility enhancement of aromatic hydrocarbons by
these eosolvents appears to be small. The concentrations of
the oxygenated additives in fuels on the market now Is
usually less than 10% by volume. Assuming that residual
NAPLs in the saturated zone do not occupy more than 20-
30% of the pore spaces, the likely concentrations of the
oxygenated additives in groundwater will be less than 1% by
volume. Our fuel-water partitioning data are consistent with
this expectation.

Altornatl¥6 Fo@te

Consideration is being given to wide-scale use of fuels that
have much greater quantities of oxygenates, especially
methanoi. For example, the often mentioned "alternative
fuel* M-85 is a 85:15 mixture of methanoi and gasoline. This
mixture will be completely misclble in water, and the aromatic
constituents  are likely to be transported with little or no
retardation as a result of cosolvency from high methanoi
concentrations.

Consider a hypothetical scenario of p-xylene transport in
groundwafer as a result of a continuous teak of gasoline
containing 10% methanoi contrasted to a leak of M-85 fuel.
The volume fraction of methanoi in groundwater would be
about 1 % in the first case and  about 80% in the latter case,
Assuming a  = 1 and 0e = 2.5, eq (8) would predict an 8-fold
increase in the mobility of p-xylene as a result of the
presence of methanoi from the M-85 fuel. For the case of  M-
10 fuel, the enhancement in p-xylene mobility woyld be too
small to be measurable and may be neglected for all pratcical
purposes,

In the foregoing analysis we have assumed that the methanoi
content would be constant alt along the flow path; this
assumption would be reasonable for a large fuel spill/leak.
For a smaller spill/teak, however, the methanoi content in
groundwater will decrease with increasing distance. For such
a case, the concepts developed for gradient-elation {eq 9)
could be used to provide an approximate estimate of the
likely reduction In retardation.

Accidental release of alternative fuels such as M-85 into
rivers or other surface water bodies  with contaminated
sediments might also result in  the release of highly-
hydrophobic organic contaminants (such as PCBs, PBBs,
dioxlns, etc.) Into the water column.  The environmental
consequences of release of such contaminants and their
transport further downstream ought  to be carefully evaluated.

Remediation of Contaminated Soils

The remediation of contaminated soils or sediments removed
from waste disposal/spill sites  by extraction with organic
solvents Is being evaluated at  present.  The data collected
during this project may be used in developing criteria for the
selection of solvents or solvent mixtures to achieve optimal
extraction of the contaminants of interest.  For example,
other factors being equal, it  may be  preferable to choose a
solvent with  greater cosoivency power so that the
contaminants can be extracted using less solvent,  tf
economic or other constraints prevent the use of pure
organic solvents and a mixture of water and cosolvents are to
be used, the log-linear cosolvency model might provide
reasonable estimates of the level of extraction achievable
with various combinations of cosolvents.  If a CMOS-water
mixture is to be used as the extracting solution, the
concentration of a CMOS needed may be decreased by
adding a small amount of a polar-PMOS (a better solvent).
Our data suggest that for a given addition of PMOS, the
reduction in the amount of CMOS is proportional to the ratios
of the cosolvency powers of the two solvents. If a mixture of
water and a polar-PMOS are to be used as trie extractant,
the addition of a small amount of a CMOS can increase the
maximum concentration of PMOS and still achieve the
level of extraction efficiency.

Laboratory Protocols

Oyr results suggest that sorptlon data (for both equilibrium
and kinetics) collected using mixed solvents can be reliably
extrapolated to estimate HOC sorption from aqueous
solutions. This is an Important finding because mixed
solvents can be ysed to facilitate the experimental
measurement of sorption and transport behavior of strongly
hydrophobic organic solutes (log K   > 5). The use of mixed
solvents reduces the time needed to conduct the sorption
experiments and may also reduce various artifacts, Including
losses via volatilization, degradation, and sorption to
glassware. Our column studies with methanoi as the
cosolvent suggest that long-term exposore to this cosolvent
had little effect on sorptlve and transport properties of a
surface soil.  This result further fends support to our
recommendation that mixed solvents, in particular methanol-
water mixtures, be used for experimental facilitation.

References Cited

Abrams, D.S.; Prausnltz, J.M., AlChEJ., 1975, 21,116-128.

Brusseau, M.L; Jessup, R.E.; Rao, P.S.C., £nv. Scl,
Techno!.. 1990, 24, 727-735.

Felice, L.J.; Zachara, J.M.; Schmidt, R.L.; Resch, R.T., pp.
39-41, IN: Free. 2nd Intaml. Conf, on Groundwater Quality
Research, Tylsa, OK. 1985.

Fredensiund, A.; Jones, R.; Prausnltz, J.M, AlChEJ,, 1975,
21,1086-1099,

Freeman, D.H.; Cheung, L.S.. Science, 1981, 214, 790-792,

Fu, J.K.; Luthy, R.G.       J. Environ. Eng,, 1986a, 112,
328-345.

Fu, J.K.; Luthy, R.G. ASCEJ. Environ. Eng,, 1988b, 112,
346-366.

Horvath, C; Melander, W,; Molnar, I. J, Chromatogr., 1976,
125,129-156.

Melander, W; Campbell, D.E.; Horvath, C,, J. Cftromafogr,,
1978,158,215-225,

McCall, P.J.; Swann, R.L., Laskowski, D.A.; Ungen, S.M.;
Vrona, S.A.; Dishburger, H. So/I. Environ, Contain. ToxicoL,
1980,24,190.

Mctntyre, W.G.; deFur, P.O., Chemosphere, 1985,14,103-
112,
                                                       12

-------
Morris, K.R; Abramowitz, R,; Final, Ft; Davis, P.; Yalkowsky,
S.H. Chemosphere, 1988,17,285-288.

Nkedl-KIzza, P.; Rao, P.S.C.; Homsby, A.Q. Env. Scl,
Techno!., 1985,19, 975-979.

Nkedl-KIzza, P.; Rao, P.S.C,; Hamsby, A.G. Env, Scl.
Techno/,, 1987, 21,1107-1111.

Nkedi-Kizza, P.; Bmsseau, M.L.; Rao, P.S.C.; Homsby, A.Q.
Env, Sci. Techno!., 1989, 23, 814-820,

Rao, P.S.G.; Lee, LS. pp. 457-471, IN: Proc. 24th Hartford
Ufa Scl. Symp., DOE Symp. Series 62, Battelle PNL,
Richfand, WA, 1987,

Rao, P.S.C.; Nkedi-Kizza, P.; Davidson, J.M. pp, 63-72, IN:
Land Treatment: A Hazardous Waste Management
Alternative, Water Research Symp, Series 13, Austin, TX,
1986.

Rao, P.S.C.; Hornsby, A.G.; Kllerease, D.P.; Nkedt-Kizza, P.
J, Env. Qua/., 1985,14, 378-383,

Rao, P.S.C.; Rhue, R.D.; Johnston, C.T.; Ogwada, R.A.
Project Completion Report,  ESL-TR-S8-G2, ESL/AFESC,
USAF, Tyndall Air Force Base, FL 1988, 196 p.

Reichardt, C. Solvents and Solvent Effects In Organic
Chemistry, VCH Publishers, W&inhelm, Germany, 1988,

Rubino, J.T.; Yaikowsky, S.H, J. Paren. Sci, Techno!., 1985,
39,  106-111,

Rubino, J.T; Yalkowsky, S.H. Pharm, Res,, 1987a, 4, 220-
230,

Rybino, J.T.; Yalkowsky, S.H, Pharm. Res,, 1987b, 4, 231-
236.

Rubino, J.T,; Yalkowsky, S.H. J. Paren. Scl Tachnol,, 1987c,
41,  172-176.

Rubino, J.T,; Blanchard, J,; Yalkowsky, S.H, J,  Paren. Sci.
Techno!,, 1984, 38,215-221.

Swarm, R.L; McCall, P.J.; Laskowski, D.A.; Dlshburger, H.,
pp,  43-48, IN: Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Fourth
Conference, ASJM STP 737, Philadelphia, PA, 1981.

Szabo, Q.; Prosser, 8 L: Bufman, R.A. Chemosphere,
19903,21,495-506,

Szabo, G.; Prosser, S.L; Bulman, R.A, Chemosphere,
19906,21.729-740.

Szabo, G.; Prosser,, S.L.; Bulman, R.A. Ghamssphere,
1990c,21,777-787,

Veith, J.T.; Austin, N.M.; Morris, R.T., Water Res., 1979,13,
43-47.

Walters, R.; Guissepi-EIIie,  A, Env. ScL TechnoL, 1988, 22,
819-825.
Walters, R.; Ostazeskl, S.A.; Gutesepi-Ellie, A, Env, Sci.
Techno!,, 1989, 23,480-484,

Wilson, G.M.; Deal, C.H., InA Big. Chem. Fundam, 1962,1,
20-23,

Woodburn, K.W.; Rao, P.S.C.; Fuky!, M.; Nkedi-Kizza, P, J.
Confam. HydroL, 1986,1, 227-241,

Yaikowsky, S.H, Solubility of Organic Solutes In Mixed
Aqueous Solvents, CRf 811852-01, U.S. Env, Prot. Agency,
Ada, OK, 1985,

Yalkowsky, S.H. Solubility of Organic Solutes in Mixed
Aqueous Solvents, CR# 812581-01, U.S. Env, Prot. Agency,
Ada, OK, 1987.

Yalkowsky, S.H.; Hoseman, T. pp, 91-134, IN; Techniques of
Solubillzation of Drugs, Yalkowsky, S.H., Ed,; Marcel Dekker,
Inc., New York, 1981.

Yalkowsky, S.H.; Rubino, J.T, J, Pharmacoi. Sci, 74,1984,
416-421.

Zachara, J.A.; Ainsworth, C.C.; Schmidt, R.L; Reseh.C.T. J.
Contam. Hydroi, 1988,1, 343-364.

Zachara, J.A.; Ainsworth, C.C.; Cowan, C.E.; Thomas, B.L
Env. Scl, TechnoL, 1987, 21, 397-402.

Appendix-A (Published Papers)

(1) Sorption and Transport of Organic Pollutants at Waste
    Disposal Sites. 1989, P.S.C. Rao, L.S. Lee, P. Nkedi-
    Kizza, and S.H, Yalkowshy. pp. 176-192, IN: Toxic
    Organic Chemicals In Porous Mediat Z. Gerstl, Y. Chen,
    U. Mingelgrin, and 8. Yaron feds.), Springer-Verlag,
    Berlin, Germany.

(2) Cosolveney of Partlally-Misclble Organic Solvents on the
    Solubility of Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals, 1990,  R.
    Final, P.S.C. Rao, L.S. Lee, and P.V. Gline. Env. Sci,
     Techno!., 24:639-647,

(3) Cosolveney and Sorption of Hydrophobic Organic
    Chemicals. 1990,  P.S.C.Rao, L.S. Lee, and R, Pinai.
    Env. Scl. Techno!,, 24:647-654.

(4) Influence of Solvent and Sortwnt Characteristics on
    Distribution of Pentaohloro-phenol in Octanol-Water and
    Soil-Water Systems, 1990, L.S. Lee, P.S.C, Rao, P.
    Nkedi-Kizza, and J j. Delfino. Env. Scl,  TechnoL,
    24:654-661.

(5) Cosolvent Effects on Sorption and Mobility of Organic
    Contaminants In Soils. 1990. A.L Wood, D.C,
     Bouchard, M.L  Brusseau, and  P.S.C. Rao.
     Chemosphere, 21:575-587.

(6)  Nonequilibrium Sorption during Displacement of
     Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals and 4SCa through Soil
     Columns wtth Aqueous and Mixed Solvents. 1989.  P.
     Nkedi-Kizza, M.L, Brusseau, P.S.G. Rao and A.G.
     Hornsby,  Env. Scl TechnoL, 23; 814-820.
                                                      13

-------
(7)  Comparison of Sorption Energetics for Hydrophobia
    Organic Chemicals by Synthetic and Natural Sorbents
    from Methanol/Water Solvent Mixtures.  1989. K.B.
    Woodburn, LS. Lee, P.S.C. Rao, and J.J. Delfino. Env.
    Sci, Fecftf)0/.,23:407-413.

(8)  Nonequilibrium Sorption and Transport of Neutral and
    Ionized Chlorophenols, 1991. L.S. Lee, P.S.C. Rao, and
    M.L. Brusseau. Env. Sci. Techno!, (in press).

(9)  Partitioning of Aromatic Constituents into Water Irom
    Gasoline and Other Complex Solvent Mixtures, P.V,
    Cline, J.J. Delfino, and P.S.C. Rao,  1991. Env. Sci.
    Technol. (in press).

(1Q)The Influence o! Organic Cosolvents on the Sorption
    Kinetics of Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals. M.L.
    Brusseau, A.L.Wood, and P.S.C, Rao. Env, Sci.
    TechnoL (in press).

(11) Gradient-elution Techniques for Assessing Sorption of
    Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals in Solvent Mixtures.
    A.L. Wood and P.S.C. Rao, 1990, Agronomy Abstracts,
    p. 51.

{12) Solubility of Anthracene in Complex Solvent System.
    1989. B. Gupta. Thesis, Department of Pharmaceutical
    Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Appendlx-B (Manuscripts in Preparation)

(1)  Solubility of Hydrophobic Compounds in Solvent
    Mixtures. R. Final, P.S.C. Rao, and L.S. Lee.  (for
    Chemosphere).

(2}  Effects of Cosolvent-Sorbent Interactions on Organic
    Contaminant Sorption. P.S.C. Rao, A.P. Gamerdinger,
    L.S. Lee, and R. Pinal. (for Chsmosphara).

(3)  Retention of Hydrophobic Solutes on Reversed-phase
    Liquid Chromatography Supports: Correlation with Solute
    Topology and Hydraphobictty Indices. K.B. Woodburn,
    J.J. Delfino, and P.S.C. Rao. (for Chsmosphera).

(4)  Retention of Nonpolar Solutes by Reversed-phase Liquid
    Chromatography Sorbents: A Study of Homologous
    Series of Compounds Using  the Solvophobic Theory.
    K.B. Woodburn, P.S.C. Rao.» and J.J. Delfino.  (for J.
    Chromatography).

(5)  Energetics of Hydrophobic Solute Retention on
    Reversed-phase  Ghromatography Supports: Effects ol
    Solute, Solvent, and Sorbent Properties. K.B. Woodburn,
    P.S.C.  Rao., and J.J. Delfino.  (for Env.  Sci. Tachnol.).

(6)  Energetics of Hydrophobic Solute Retention on
    Reversed-phase  Chromatography Supports: Evaluation
    of Enthalpy-entropy Compensation  Model. K.B.
    Woodburn, J.J. Delfino, and P.S.C. Rao. (for Env. Sci,
    TechnoL).

(7)  Solubility of Anthracene in Complex Solvent System.
    1990. B. Gupta, D. Mishra, and S.H. Yalkowsky.  (for
    Pharmaceutical Research ).
Disclaimer

The information in this document has      funded wholly or
in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
under cooperative agreement CR-814512 with the University
of Florida. This document has been subjected to the
Agency's pear and administrative review and has been
approved for publication as an EPA document.



All research projects making conclusions or recom-
mendations based on environmentally       measurements
and funded by the Environmental Protection Agency are
required to participate in the Agency Quality Assurance (QA)
program. This  project     conducted under an approved QA
project plan.  Information on the plan and documentation of
the QA activities are available from the Principal Investigator
(P.S.C. Rao),
                                                      14

-------
United Slates
Environmental Proiectign
Agency
Center (or Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 4526i
 &        PAID
EPA
  No, G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use,  S300
                                                                PlBasd mjkft all rvtewssar^ changes on the above tab*!.
                                                                flc-Mih IH copy. J'i'i fi3i"'n lu tne addfess >n ihe upper
                                                                )( VOM d» n"i wish 10 i«c««ve (hes« fepotfs CHECK HERE u,
                                                                iteti«;H (a topy (hi!, tuvi-f .ind teturo to the address in the
                                                              EPA/000/y-91/009

-------