Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
NOTICE
v>EPA
This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or
positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data
that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to
facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of
technical developments.
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
ERGNo. 0133.18.007.001
KANSAS CITY PM CHARACTERIZATION STUDY
FINAL REPORT
EPA Contract #GS 10F-0036K
Prepared for:
Greg Janssen, Project Officer
Carl Fulper, Alternate Project Officer, Work Assignment Officer
Carl Scarbro, Alternate Work Assignment Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2000 Traverwood Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Project Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared by:
Sandeep Kishan Wiliam Crews MiaZmud EricFujita
Andrew Burnette Richard Snow Rob Santos Dave Campbell
Scott Fincher Stacey Bricka Pat Arnott
Michael Sabisch
Eastern Research Group, Inc. BKI NuStats DRI
5608 Parkcrest Drive Suite 100
Austin, TX 78731
October 27, 2006
-------
Acknowledgments
ERG appreciates having had the opportunity to work on this complex, exciting, and
important project for the EPA. Many people were responsible for completing this large, multi-
year field study. EPA, NREL and the CRC were responsible for the vision of this work. We
must thank EPA management Gene Tierney, Carl Fulper, Carl Scarbro, Rich Baldauf, Kitty
Walsh, Greg Janssen, Jim Warila, and Bruce Cantrell for their continual support throughout the
study. Several other EPA personnel also provided valuable project support such as Thien Bui
(EPA Region 7) for use of a NOx analyzer for the study, David Plagge for his contractual
support and Ed Nam, David Brzezinski, Arvon Mitcham, Ed Glover, John Koupal, Matt Spears
and Bob Giannelli for their technical support. Many individuals within the CRC also provided
useful contributions throughout the project including Doug Lawson, Steve Cadle, Brent Bailey,
Albert Hochhauser, Mani Natarajan, Kevin Black, and Chris Tennant. In addition, Todd Ashby
and several staff persons at MARC also provided assistance during the project.
The ERG team management owes a ton of gratitude to all its subcontractors, including:
• BKI - Oreste Bevilacqua, William Crews, Richard Snow, Jerry Faircloth, Jason
Mills, Keri Cook, Kevin Hicks, and James Faircloth.
• DRI - Eric Fujita, Dave Campbell, Pat Arnott, and John Walker.
• NuStats - Mia Zmud, Ramon Dickerson, Rob Santos, and Stacey Bricka
• Sensors - Atul Shah, Carl Ensfield, David Booker, Holly Haig-Ramage, and
Andrew Reading
• ESP - Casey Biedring and Judith Zwicker
Many folks within ERG also assisted throughout this project, including John Dietel, for
his patience and perseverance in identifying a suitable testing facility in KC and managing
contracts with various local vendors, and Craig Pilon and Paul Develis, for helping to manage
project accounting issues. Lori Snook and Bill Franklin in ERG's local Kansas City office
provided immense support throughout the project. Many other personnel from multiple ERG
offices deserve thanks for their assistance with the project, in particular Rodney Williams and
Carl Young, for their tireless fieldwork, and Boonsiri Limsakul, who assisted with SAS
programming and data analysis support. Andrew Burnette was responsible for managing the
implementation of fieldwork, and his ingenuity during this period and throughout the study
proved invaluable. The final core team for the field work was led by Michael Sabisch, whose
dedication, along with Scott Fincher and Andrew Burnette, helped make this project a success.
The special care and creativity needed in the field to work in a safe environment, to make sure all
the project goals were continuously monitored, and to be responsive to the participating public
required much dedication from all our field personnel. In addition, Scott Fincher worked
tirelessly in preparing study data for the final MSOD data submission and also in preparation of
this report, along with Michael Sabisch and Anita White.
The ERG team has worked hard to exceed expectations on this project, and we are
pleased to have had the opportunity to work closely with the EPA and sponsors to make a study
of this magnitude a success.
Sandeep Kishan
-------
Table of Contents
Acronyms xvi
Executive Summary 1
Overview of Study Objectives 1
Overview of Test Program Results 1
Overview of Sample Selection and Recruiting 1
Testing Performed in Kansas City 8
Summary of Results and Conclusions 10
Review of PM Emissions Trends 12
RSD Data Collection 17
Round 1 Summer Regulated Pollutants 20
Round 2 Winter Regulated Pollutants 22
Summer vs. Winter Comparison of Regulated Pollutants 24
Analysis of In-Round Duplicate Testing Results 26
Dynamometer vs. PEMS Emission Measurement Comparison 28
Continuous PM Emission Measurement Results 32
Comparison of QCM Versus Time-Inegrated Gravimetric Mass Measurements34
Particulate-Phase Emissions Speciation from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles ...41
Gaseous-Phase Emissions Speciation from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles 48
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Study outline 3
1.2.2 Round 1 Testing 7
1.2.3 Round 2 Testing 8
1.2.4 Round 1 to Round 2 Retest Vehicles 8
1.3 Report Presentation 9
2.0 Site Select!on and Project Setup 1
2.1 QAPP 1
2.2 Dynamometer Setup 1
2.3 Maintenance and Calibration of CVS, Dynamometer and Regulated Emissions
Instrumentation 3
2.3.1 Setup and Calibration of Instruments and Samplers 5
2.3.2 Additional Support Equipment 16
2.4 PEMS Setup 17
2.4.1 Changes from Round 1 17
2.4.2 Procedural changes between Rounds 1 and 2 19
3.0 Vehicle Recruitment 1
3.1 Recruitment Process 1
3.2 Cohort / Vehicle Frame Analysis 5
3.3 Cohort Respondent / Nonrespondent Analysis 7
3.4 Cohort Recruitment Analysis 9
3.5 Vehicle Recruitment Sample Plan 18
3.6 Round 1 Recruitment - Goals and Recruitment Statistics 33
3.7 Round 2 Recruitment - Goals and Recruitment Statistics 36
3.8 Tested Vehicles 39
-------
3.8.1 Round 1 39
3.8.2 Round 2 40
3.8.3 Round 1 to Round 2 Retest Vehicles 42
4.0 Vehicle Emission Testing 1
4.1 Typical Testing Day 1
4.2 Collection and Validation of Data from the Chassis Dynamometer 5
4.3 PEMS Test Procedures 26
4.3.1 PEMS Installation and Testing 26
4.3.1.1 Installation 26
4.3.1.2 Onsite Quality Assurance 26
4.3.1.3 PEMS Test Issues 27
4.3.1.4 Conditioning Testing 28
4.3.1.5 Drive-Away Testing 30
4.3.1.6 PEMS Testing Concurrent with Dynamometer Testing 31
4.4 Regulated Emissions Measurement Results 33
4.4.1 Summary of Round 1 Regulated Emissions Measurements 33
4.4.2 Summary of Round 2 Regulated Emissions Measurements 61
4.4.3 Control vehicle results 95
4.4.3.1 Round 1 Control Vehicle Test Results 95
4.4.3.2 Round 2 Control Vehicle Test Results 98
4.4.4 Comparison of Emissions from Vehicles Measured in Both Rounds of the
Study 103
4.4.5 Review of In-Round Duplicate Test Results Ill
4.4.5.1 Round 1 Duplicate Testing Ill
4.4.5.2 Round 2 Duplicate Testing 117
4.4.6 Review of Miscellaneous Regulated Pollutant Emission Trends 124
4.5 Evaluation of Exhaust PM2.5 Mass Measurements 158
4.5.1 Introduction 158
4.5.2 Measurement Methods 158
4.5.2.1 Gravimetric Mass Measurements 159
4.5.2.2 Continuous PM Measurements 159
4.5.3 Results 168
4.5.3.1 Evaluation of Gravimetric Mass Measurements 168
4.5.3.2 Evaluation of QCM Mass Measurements 175
4.5.3.3 Comparison of QCM Versus Time-Integrated Gravimetric Mass
Measurements 179
4.5.3.4 Average QCM-measured concentrations relative to vehicle speed
emissions 181
4.5.3.5 Evaluation of Continuous Optical Mass Measurements 193
4.5.3.6 Average BC and PM concentrations in each stratum as related to
vehicle speed 198
4.5.4 Conclusions 208
4.6 Speciated Emissions of Particulate Matter 209
4.6.1 Background 209
4.6.2 Experimental Methods 210
4.6.2.1 Sampling Methods 213
11
-------
4.6.2.2 Sample Selection for Chemical Analyses 215
4.6.2.3 Analytical Methods 216
4.6.2.4 Field Blank Subtraction 220
4.6.2.5 Calculation of Composite Speciated Profiles 221
4.6.3 Results and Conclusions 222
4.7 Speciated VOC Emissions and Gas-Phase Mobile Source Air Toxics 251
4.7.1 Background 251
4.7.2 Experimental Methods 251
4.7.2.1 Sampling Methods for Speciated VOC 252
4.7.2.2 Analysis Methods 258
4.7.3 Results and Conclusions 261
4.8 RSD Data Collection Process and Data Summary 273
4.8.1 Site Selection 273
4.8.2 Summary of RSD Data from Rounds 1 and 2 274
4.8.3 Comparison of RSD Observations with PEMS Data 282
4.9 PAMS testing 290
5.0 MSOD1
6.0 References 1
Index of Appendices 1
The numerous Appendices cited in this document have been provided separately in electronic
format. An index of these appendix files is provided on page A-l.
in
-------
List of Tables
Table OS-1. Demographic Comparison of MARC RDD Survey of Households and
Census 2000 Distributions OS-3
Table OS-2. Comparison of MARC RDD Survey and Census 2000 Geographic
Distributions OS-4
Table OS-3. MARC Household Survey Non-Respondents and Respondents by County of
Residence OS-4
Table OS-4. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by County of Residence OS-5
Table OS-5. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Income Level OS-5
Table OS-6. MARC Household Characteristics Compared to Census OS-6
Table OS-7. MARC Person Characteristics Compared To Census OS-8
Table OS-8. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 1 OS-10
Table OS-9. Round 1 Tests Conducted OS-11
Table OS-10. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 2 (excluding Round 1
Retest Vehicles) OS-11
Table OS-11. Round 2 Tests Conducted OS-11
Table OS-12. Round 1 Average Emission Data for Each Vehicle Bin including
Individual Phase and Composite Test OS-21
Table OS-13. Round 2 Average Emission Data for Each Vehicle Bin including
Individual Phase and Composite Test OS-23
Table OS-14. Paired t-test Results on In-Round Duplicate Tests OS-27
Table OS-15. Emission rates in mg/mile for phase 1 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks OS-33
Table OS-16. Emission rates in mg/mile for phase 2 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks OS-33
Table OS-17. Emission rates in mg/mile for phase 3 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks OS-34
Table OS-18. Average Emission Rates in mg/mile Derived from QCM and Gravimetric
Filter Measurements for all Test Phases OS-35
Table OS-19. Average Emission Rates for Round 2 in mg/mile Derived from QCM and
Gravimetric Filter Measurements for all Test Phases OS-35
Table OS-18. Summary of PM data for Round 1 composite exhaust samples1 OS-42
Table OS-19. Summary of PM data for Round 2 composite exhaust samples1 OS-43
Table 1-1. Round 1 Tests Conducted 1-8
Table 1-2. Round 2 Tests Conducted 1-8
Table 2-1. Dynamometer Torque Cell- Dead Weight Calibrations 2-4
Table 2-2. Round 1 Sampler Calibration and Audit Results 2-15
Table 2-3. Round 2 Sampler Calibration and Audit Results 2-16
Table 2-4. Sampling Support Equipment Rented or Purchased by ERG, On-Site 2-17
Table 3-1. Summary of Incentives for the KC Study 3-4
Table 3-2. Demographic Comparison of MARC RDD Survey of Households and
Census 2000 Distributions 3-6
Table 3-3. Comparison of MARC RDD Survey and Census 2000 Geographic Distributions 3-7
Table 3-4. MARC Household Survey Non-Respondents and Respondents by County of
Residence 3-8
IV
-------
Table 3-5. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by County of Residence 3-8
Table 3-6. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Income Level 3-8
Table 3-7. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Vehicle Type 3-9
Table 3-8. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Vehicle Year 3-9
Table 3-9. MARC Household Characteristics Compared to Census 3-10
Table 3-10. MARC Household Characteristics for Round 1 Retests in Round 2 3-12
Table 3-11. MARC Person Characteristics Compared To Census 3-13
Table 3-12. Mode to Work Comparison 3-14
Table 3-13. Summary of Data Used for Development of Sample Sizes for the KC Study... 3-18
Table 3-14. Mean PMs for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative Cutpoints for the Oldest
Vehicles 3-19
Table 3-15. Standard Deviations of PMs for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative Cutpoints for
the Oldest Vehicles 3-19
Table 3-16. Mean PMs for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative Cutpoints for the Middle-Aged
Vehicles 3-20
Table 3-17. PM Standard Deviations for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative Cutpoints for the
Middle-Aged Vehicles 3-20
Table 3-18. Neymann (Optimal) Allocation Using PM per Vehicle-Mile 3-21
Table 3-19. Neymann (Optimal) Allocation Using Annual PM Emissions 3-23
Table 3-20. Sample Allocation for Proportionate Design Based on Annual Percentage PM
Emissions Across Strata 3-24
Table 3-21. Optimal Allocation Design Based on Annual Percentage PM Emissions Across
Strata 3-25
Table 3-22. An Ad Hoc Weighting Strategy 3-26
Table 3-23. Optimal Designs, a Proportionate Design, and Two Alternatives 3-27
Table 3-24. Using Round 1 Annualized PM Volume to Compare Original & Revised Optimal
Allocations with the Current Sample Design 3-31
Table 3-25. Sample Allocation for Three Designs and Impact of Final Design on Round 2
Testing 3-33
Table 3-26. Vehicle Recruitment Goals for Round 1 3-34
Table 3-27. Vehicle Recruitment Sample Flow by Class, Round 1 3-36
Table 3-28. Vehicle Recruitment Goals For Round 2 3-37
Table 3-29. Round 2 Vehicle Recruitment Sample Flow by Class 3-39
Table 3-30. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 1 3-40
Table 3-31. Round 1 Tests Conducted 3-40
Table 3-32. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 2 (excluding Round 1
Retest Vehicles) 3-40
Table 3-33. Round 2 Tests Conducted 3-42
Table 3-34. Round 2 Dynamometer Tests of Vehicles Originally Tested During Round 1... 3-42
Table 4-1. Dynamometer Modal File Data Fields 4-5
Table 4-2. Null Data Removed From Figures 4-4 through 4-6 4-10
Table 4-3. HC Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2 4-11
Table 4-4. NOx Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2 4-12
Table 4-5. CO Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2 4-13
Table 4-6. CO2 Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2 4-14
Table 4-7. Fuel Economy for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2 4-15
v
-------
Table 4-8. By-Test Comparison of Round 1 PEMS vs. Dynamometer Composite
Results 4-34
Table 4-9. Round 1 Conditioning Run Test Results 4-46
Table 4-10. Round 1 Driveaway Test Results 4-55
Table 4-11. Fuel Analysis Results from Round 1 Vehicle Samples 4-59
Table 4-12. By-Test Comparison of Round 2 PEMS vs. Dynamometer Composite Results 4-62
Table 4-13. Round 2 Conditioning Run Test Results 4-75
Table 4-14. Round 2 Driveaway Test Results 4-89
Table 4-15. Fuel Analysis Results from Round 2 Vehicle Samples 4-93
Table 4-16. Emissions Summary for Ann Arbor Control Vehicle Testing 4-95
Table 4-17. Round 1 by Phase Emissions Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in
Kansas City 4-96
Table 4-18. Round 1 Composite Emission Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in
Kansas City 4-98
Table 4-19. Round 2 by Phase Emissions Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in
Kansas City 4-99
Table 4-20. Round 2 Composite Emission Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in
Kansas City 4-102
Table 4-21. Round I/Round 2 Retest Composite Emissions 4-104
Table 4-22. Round 1 Duplicate Testing Composite Emissions 4-112
Table 4-23. Round 2 Duplicate Testing Composite Emissions 4-118
Table 4-24. Paired t-test Results for In-Round Duplicates 4-123
Table 4-25. Round 1 Vehicle Distribution by Vehicle Type and Model Year Group 4-157
Table 4-26. Round 2 Vehicle Distribution by Vehicle Type and Model Year Group 4-157
Table 4-27. Parameters Recorded by the QCM System Computer Control/Data Acquisition
System During Round 1 Tests 4-163
Table 4-28. Parameters Recorded by the QCM System Computer Control/Data Acquisition
System During Round 2 Tests 4-164
Table 4-29. Results of second gravimetric mass measurement interlaboratory comparison.4-174
Table 4-30. Summary of Integral Parameters Reported for Each Test in both Round 1 and
Round 2 4-176
Table 4-31. Summary of Reduced Data Reported for Each Test in Both Round 1 and
Round 2 4-176
Tables 4-32. A Summary of QC Codes Used in the Integral Summary File 4-177
Table 4-33. Average Emission Rates for Round 1 in mg/mile Derived from QCM and
Gravimetric Filter Measurements for all Test Phases 4-179
Table 4-34. Average Emission Rates for Round 2 in mg/mile Derived from QCM and
Gravimetric Filter Measurements for all Test Phases 4-180
Table 4-35. Emission rates in mg/mile for Phase 1 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks 4-207
Table 4-36. Emission rates in mg/mile for Phase 2 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks 4-207
Table 4-37. Emission rates in mg/mile for Phase 3 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks 4-208
Table 4-38. Summary of sample selection for chemical analysis during Round 1 4-211
Table 4-39. Summary of sample selection for chemical analysis during Round 2 4-212
VI
-------
Table 4-40. Vehicle test samples selected for chemical analysis in Round 1 and composite
identification 4-217
Table 4-41. Vehicle test samples selected for chemical analysis in Round 2 and composite
identification 4-218
Table 4-42. Chemical speciation composites of dilution blanks 4-219
Table 4-43. Summary of PM data for Round 1 composite exhaust samples1 4-224
Table 4-44. Summary of PM data for Round 2 composite exhaust samples1 4-225
Table 4-45. Simulated loss rate of 1,3-butadiene with varying levels of 1,3-butadiene,
NOandNO2 4-253
Table 4-46. Summary of RSD vs. PEMS results at RSD Site 21 4-287
Table 4-47. PAMS Vehicle Summary 4-290
vn
-------
List of Figures
Figure OS-1. Round 1 PM2.5 Emissions by Class-Year Bin OS-13
Figure OS-2. Round 1 % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.5 OS-14
Figure OS-3. Round 2 PM2.5 Emissions by Class-Year Bin OS-15
Figure OS-4. Round 2 % Proj ected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.5 OS-16
Figure OS-5. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison OS-18
Figure OS-6. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison OS-19
Figure OS-7. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison OS-19
Figure OS-8. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison OS-20
Figure OS-9. Winter vs. Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5 OS-24
Figure OS-10. Winter vs. Summer NOx OS-25
Figure OS-11. Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Average Temperature OS-25
Figure OS-12. Results from Dynamometer vs. PEMS Emission Measurements Conducted
During Round 1 (Summer Study) OS-29
Figure OS-13. Results from Dynamometer vs. PEMS Emission Measurements Conducted
During Round 2 (Winter Study) OS-30
Figure OS-14. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel
Economy for Round 1 OS-31
Figure OS-15. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel
Economy for Round 2 OS-32
Figure OS-16 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 1 Cars OS-37
Figure OS-17 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
3 Cars OS-38
Figure OS-18 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
1 Cars OS-39
Figure OS-19 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
3 Cars OS-40
Figure OS-20. Gravimetric mass versus total carbon by TOR OS-44
Figure OS-21. Elemental Carbon by TOR versus average BC by photoacoustic
method OS-44
Figure OS-22. Gravimetric mass versus sum of XRF elements and total carbon by TOR. OS-45
Figure OS-23. Sulfur by XRF versus Sulfate by 1C for all exhaust composites OS-46
Figure OS-24. Total organic carbon by TOR versus indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)pyrelene
and coronene in mg/mile OS-47
Figure OS-25. Total organic carbon by TOR versus sum of hopanes and steranes for exhaust
composites OS-47
Figure OS-26. Correlation plot of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRINMHC (ppmC) for
Round 1 OS-49
Figure OS-27. Correlation plots of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRI NMHC (ppmC) for
Round 2 OS-50
Figure OS-28. Ratios of the TNMHC measured by DRI to BKI during Round 2 shown
chronologically OS-50
Figure OS-29. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 1 OS-51
Vlll
-------
Figure OS-30. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 2 OS-51
Figure OS-31. Emission rates (mg/mile) of formaldehyde for individual/composite samples from
Round 1 OS-52
Figure OS-32. Emission rates (mg/mile) of formaldehyde for individual/composite samples from
Round 2 OS-52
Figure OS-33. Fraction of BTEX for individual/composite samples from Round 1 OS-53
Figure OS-34. Fraction of BTEX for valid individual/composite samples from Round 2.. OS-53
Figure OS-35. Correlation plots of related VOC species for all exhaust composites OS-54
Figure 1-1. Example Plot of PM Data from Light-Duty Gasoline Cars and Trucks, Model
Year 1994 and Older 1-3
Figure 2-1. Control Chart for Daily PDF Speeds 2-6
Figure 2-2. Control Chart for Daily Dynamometer Coastdown Times 2-6
Figure 2-3. Control Chart for Daily Dynamometer Speeds 2-6
Figure 2-4. Schematic of Sampling Train with Flow Rates. (Heated Tubing is Shown as
Double Lines, all heated components are maintained at 47± 2 °C) 2-7
Figure 2-5. Components of the QCM Cart System 2-10
Figure 2-6. Onsite Sampling Train 2-11
Figure 2-7. KC Facility Instrumentation 2-12
Figure 3-1. Kansas City Metropolitan Area 3-2
Figure 3-2. Worker Comparison 3-14
Figure 3-3. Travel Time Comparison 3-15
Figure 3-4. Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Sample Flow Summary 3-16
Figure 3-5. KS and MO Vehicle Registration Database Sample Flow Summary 3-17
Figure 3-6. Household Sample Flow Summary 3-35
Figure 3-7. Sample Flow Summary for Round 2 3-38
Figure 4-1. CVS Sampling System Schematic 4-2
Figure 4-2. Kansas City Exhaust Measurement Flowchart 4-3
Figure 4-3. Daily Testing Flowchart 4-4
Figure 4-4. Modal to Bag Ratios for CO2, CO, NOx, and THC 4-8
Figure 4-5. By-Phase Modal to Bag CO Ratios vs. Modal CO Concentration, both
Rounds 4-17
Figure 4-6. By-Phase Modal to Bag HC Ratios vs. Modal HC Concentration, both
Rounds 4-19
Figure 4-7. Rounds 1 and 2 Test Temperatures and Barometric Pressure 4-22
Figure 4-8. Rounds 1 and 2 Dilution Tunnel Temperatures 4-23
Figure 4-9. Rounds 1 and 2 Tunnel HC Levels With Engine Off Between Phase 2 and
Phase3 4-24
Figure 4-10. Sample Speed Trace for a Dynamometer Conditioning Run 4-29
Figure 4-11. Sample Speed-Acceleration Distribution for A Dynamometer Conditioning
Run 4-30
Figure 4-12. Plots of Round 1 Dyno vs. PEMS Measurements 4-43
Figure 4-13. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel
Economy for Round 1 4-56
Figure 4-14. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel Economy
for Round 1 4-57
IX
-------
Figure 4-15. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Conditioning Run Fuel Economy for
Round 1 4-57
Figure 4-16. Plots of Round 2 Dynamometer vs. PEMS Measurements 4-73
Figure 4-17. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel
Economy for Round 2 4-91
Figure 4-18. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel Economy
for Round 2 4-92
Figure 4-19. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Conditioning Run Fuel Economy for
Round 2 4-92
Figure 4-20. Winter vs. Summer Gravimetric PM25 - Linear 4-105
Figure 4-21. Winter vs. Summer Gravimetric PM2.5 - Logarithmic 4-105
Figure 4-22. Winter vs. Summer HC - Linear 4-106
Figure 4-23. Winter vs. Summer HC - Logarithmic 4-106
Figure 4-24. Winter vs. Summer CO - Linear 4-107
Figure 4-25. Winter vs. Summer CO - Logarithmic 4-107
Figure 4-26. Winter vs. Summer NOx -Linear 4-108
Figure 4-27. Winter vs. Summer NOx - Logarithmic 4-108
Figure 4-28. Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Average Temperature 4-109
Figure 4-29. HC vs. Average Temperature 4-109
Figure 4-30. CO vs. Average Temperature 4-110
Figure 4-31. NOx vs. Average Temperature 4-110
Figure 4-32. First vs. Second Round 1 Gravimetric PM25 Tests - Linear 4-113
Figure 4-33. First vs. Second Round 1 Gravimetric PM2.5 Tests - Logarithmic 4-113
Figure 4-34. First vs. Second Round 1 HC Tests - Linear 4-114
Figure 4-35. First vs. Second Round 1 HC Tests - Logarithmic 4-114
Figure 4-36. First vs. Second Round 1 CO Tests - Linear 4-115
Figure 4-37. First vs. Second Round 1 CO Tests - Logarithmic 4-115
Figure 4-38. First vs. Second Round 1 NOx Tests - Linear 4-116
Figure 4-39. First vs. Second Round 1 NOx Tests - Logarithmic 4-116
Figure 4-40. First vs. Second Round 2 Gravimetric PM2.5 Tests - Linear 4-119
Figure 4-41. First vs. Second Round 2 Gravimetric PM2.5 Tests - Logarithmic 4-119
Figure 4-42. First vs. Second Round 2 HC Tests - Linear 4-120
Figure 4-43. First vs. Second Round 2 HC Tests - Logarithmic 4-120
Figure 4-44. First vs. Second Round 2 CO Tests - Linear 4-121
Figure 4-45. First vs. Second Round 2 CO Tests - Logarithmic 4-121
Figure 4-46. First vs. Second Round 2 NOx Tests - Linear 4-122
Figure 4-47. First vs. Second Round 2 NOx Tests -Logarithmic 4-122
Figure 4-48. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.5 Emissions by Class-Year Bin 4-125
Figure 4-49. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Class-Year Bin 4-126
Figure 4-50. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Class-Year Bin 4-127
Figure 4-51. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Class- Year Bin 4-128
Figure 4-52. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.5 Emissions by Class-Year Bin 4-129
Figure 4-53. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Class-Year Bin 4-130
Figure 4-54. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Class-Year Bin 4-131
Figure 4-55. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Class-Year Bin 4-132
Figure 4-56. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.5 vs. NOx by Vehicle Type-Year 4-133
-------
Figure 4-57. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.5 vs. NOX by Vehicle Type-Year 4-134
Figure 4-58. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.5 vs. NOX by Vehicle Type-Year 4-135
Figure 4-59. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.5 vs. NOX by Vehicle Type-Year 4-136
Figure 4-60. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM25 Emissions by Model Year 4-137
Figure 4-61. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2s Emissions by Model Year 4-138
Figure 4-62. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM25 Emissions by Model Year 4-139
Figure 4-63. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Model Year 4-140
Figure 4-64. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM25 Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-141
Figure 4-65. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-142
Figure 4-66. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-143
Figure 4-67. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-144
Figure 4-68. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM25 Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-145
Figure 4-69. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-146
Figure 4-70. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-147
Figure 4-71. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Odometer Mileage 4-148
Figure 4-72. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.5 4-149
Figure 4-73. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite HC 4-150
Figure 4-74. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite CO 4-151
Figure 4-75. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite NOX 4-152
Figure 4-76. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.5 4-153
Figure 4-77. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite HC 4-154
Figure 4-78. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite CO 4-155
Figure 4-79. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite NOX 4-156
Figure 4-80. Schematic of the QCM 4-160
Figure 4-81. Example mass trace from the QCM analyzer 4-162
Figure 4-82. Theoretical mass scattering efficiency for a perfect nephelometer 4-165
Figure 4-83. Schematic of the photoacoustic instrument 4-167
Figure 4-84. Field blanks for gravimetric mass during Round 1 of the Kansas City
Study in jig/filter 4-169
Figure 4-85. Round 1 Media Blanks 4-170
Figure 4-86. Histogram of uncorrected gravimetric mass for Phase 3 filter samples
from Round 1 4-171
Figure 4-87. Round 2 Media Blanks 4-172
Figure 4-88. Gravimetric Mass Comparison 4-173
Figure 4-89. Results of second gravimetric mass measurement interlaboratory
comparison 4-174
Figure 4-90. Example of Reduced Data for Round 1 4-178
Figure 4-91. Example of Reduced Data for Round 2 4-178
Figure 4-92 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
1 Trucks 4-181
Figure 4-93 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
3 Trucks 4-182
Figure 4-94 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
2 Trucks 4-183
Figure 4-95 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
1 Cars 4-184
XI
-------
Figure 4-96 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase 3
Cars 4-185
Figure 4-97. Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase 2
Cars 4-186
Figure 4-98 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase 1
Trucks 4-187
Figure 4-99 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase 3
Trucks 4-188
Figure 4-100 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase 2
Trucks 4-189
Figure 4-101 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
1 Cars 4-190
Figure 4-102 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
3 Cars 4-191
Figure 4-103 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM Phase
2 Cars 4-192
Figure 4-104. PM data from the DustTrak and DataRAM4 for a) low and b) high range... 4-193
Figure 4-105. Scatter plots of gravimetric mass and nephelometer mass for the DustTrak
andDataRAM4 4-194
Figure 4-106. Histograms of optical PM obtained with the TSI DustTrak and DataRAM
nephelometers 4-195
Figure 4-107. Histogram of BC mass emission rate obtained with the DRI photoacoustic
instrument 4-197
Figure 4-108. Histograms of the ratio BC to total PM 4-197
Figure 4-109. Stratum averaged BC emission for passenger cars as it relates to
vehicle speed 4-199
Figure 4-110. Stratum averaged BC emission for trucks as it relates to vehicle speed 4-200
Figure 4-111. BC emissions during Phase 2 of the unified cycle for passenger cars 4-201
Figure 4-112. BC emissions during Phase 2 of the unified cycle for trucks 4-202
Figure 4-113. Stratum averaged DustTrak PM emission for passenger cars as it relates to
vehicle speed 4-203
Figure 4-114. Stratum averaged DustTrak PM emission for trucks as it relates to vehicle
speed 4-204
Figure 4-115. DustTrak PM emissions during Phase 2 of the unified cycle for passenger
cars 4-205
Figure 4-116. DustTrak PM emissions during Phase 2 of the unified cycle for trucks 4-206
Figure 4-117. Schematic of sampling train with flow rates 4-214
Figure 4-118. Gravimetric mass versus total carbon by TOR 4-226
Figure 4-119. Elemental Carbon by TOR versus average BC by photoacoustic method 4-227
Figure 4-120. Gravimetric mass versus sum of XRF elements and total carbon by TOR ... 4-228
Figure 4-121. Sulfur by XRF *3 versus Sulfate by 1C for all exhaust composites 4-229
Figure 4-122. Total organic carbon by TOR versus indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene
and coronene in mg/mile 4-230
Figure 4-123. Total organic carbon by TOR versus sum of hopanes and steranes for exhaust
composites 4-230
xn
-------
Figure 4-124. Abundances of elements and ions from XRF and 1C analysis of all exhaust and
dilution blank composites during Round 1 4-231
Figure 4-125. Abundances of elements and ions from XRF and 1C analysis of all exhaust and
dilution blank composites during Round 2 4-232
Figure 4-126. Abundances of carbon fractions from IMPROVE-TOR analysis of all exhaust
and dilution blank composites during Round 1 4-233
Figure 4-127. Abundance of carbon fractions from IMPROVE-TOR analysis of all exhaust
and dilution blank composites during Round 2 4-234
Figure 4-128. Abundances of benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno[123-cd]pyrene, coronene and sum of
26 other particulate PAH for exhaust and dilution blank composites during
Round 1 4-235
Figure 4-129. Abundances of benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno[123-cd]pyrene, coronene and sum of
26 other particulate PAH for exhaust and dilution blank composites during
Round 2 4-236
Figure 4-130. Abundances of particulate PAHs for exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 1 4-237
Figure 4-131. Abundances of particulate PAHs for exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 2 4-238
Figure 4-132. Abundances of naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnapthalene for
exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1 in comparison to other volatile,
semi-volatile and particulate PAHs 4-239
Figure 4-133. Abundances of naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnapthalene for
exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 2 in comparison to other volatile,
semi-volatile and particulate PAHs 4-240
Figure 4-134. Abundances of hopanes for exhaust and dilution blank composites during
Round 1 4-241
Figure 4-135. Abundances of hopanes for exhaust and dilution blank composites during
Round 2 4-242
Figure 4-136. Abundances of steranes for exhaust and dilution blank composites during
Round 1 4-243
Figure 4-137. Abundances of steranes for exhaust and dilution blank composites during
Round 2 4-244
Figure 4-138. Abundances of polar compounds for exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 1 4-245
Figure 4-139. Abundances of polar compounds for exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 2 4-246
Figure 4-140. Abundances of nitro-PAHs for exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 1 4-247
Figure 4-141. Abundances of nitro-PAHs for exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 2 4-248
Figure 4-142. Relative abundance of alkanes in exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 1 4-249
Figure 4-143. Relative abundance of alkanes in exhaust and dilution blank composites
during Round 2 4-250
Figure 4-144. Stability of 1,3-butadiene in canister samples 4-254
Xlll
-------
Figure 4-145. Time-series plot of the dilution tunnel versus denuded NOx concentrations
for each test during Round 1 4-256
Figure 4-146. Correlations of 1,3-butadiene with propene and benzene 4-257
Figure 4-147. Correlations of 1,3-butadiene and propene 4-260
Figure 4-148. Correlation plot of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRINMHC (ppmC)
for Round 1 4-263
Figure 4-149. Correlation plots of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRI NMHC (ppmC)
for Round 2 4-263
Figure 4-150. Ratios of the TNMHC measured by DRI to BKI during Round 2 shown
chronologically 4-264
Figure 4-151. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 1 4-264
Figure 4-152. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 2 4-265
Figure 4-153. Emission rates (mg/mile) of formaldehyde for individual/composite
samples from Round 1 4-265
Figure 4-154. Emission rates (mg/mile) of formaldehyde for individual/composite
samples from Round 2 4-266
Figure 4-155. Fraction of BTEX for individual/composite samples from Round 1 4-266
Figure 4-156. Fraction of BTEX for valid individual/composite samples from Round 2.... 4-267
Figure 4-157. Correlation plots of related VOC species for all exhaust composites 4-268
Figure 4-158. Emission rates (mg/mile) of 1,3-butadiene (measured) for individual/
composite samples from Round 1 4-270
Figure 4-159. Emission rates (mg/mile) of 1,3-butadiene (measured) for individual/
composite samples from Round 2 4-270
Figure 4-160. Emission rates (mg/mile) of 1,3-butadiene (measured) for individual/
composite samples from Round 1 and estimated from regression with propene 4-271
Figure 4-161. Emission rates (mg/mile) of 1,3-butadiene (measured) for individual/
composite samples from Round 2 and estimated from regression with propene 4-271
Figure 4-162. Emission rates (mg/mile) of acrolein for individual/composite samples from
Round 1 4-272
Figure 4-163. Emission rates (mg/mile) of acrolein for individual/composite samples from
Round 2. Lighter bars are upper bound estimates 4-272
Figure 4-164. RSD Sites Chosen in the Kansas City Area 4-274
Figure 4-165. RSD-4000 Data Counts at each Round-1 Site 4-276
Figure 4-166. RSD-4000 Data Counts at each Round-2 Site 4-276
Figure 4-167. Round 1 RSD-4000 Vehicle Counts, by Model Year 4-277
Figure 4-168. Round 2 RSD-4000 Vehicle Counts, by Model Year 4-277
Figure 4-169. RSD-4000 Average Vehicle Speed, by Model Year, of Round-1 Data 4-278
Figure 4-170. RSD-4000 Average Vehicle Speed, by Model Year, of Round-2 Data 4-278
Figure 4-171. RSD-4000 Average CO Percentage, by Model Year, of Round-1 Data 4-279
Figure 4-172. RSD-4000 Average CO Percentage, by Model Year, of Round-2 Data 4-279
Figure 4-173. RSD-4000 Average HC Concentration, by Model Year, of Round-1 Data.. 4-280
Figure 4-174. RSD-4000 Average HC Concentration, by Model Year, of Round-2 Data.. 4-280
Figure 4-175. RSD-4000 Average NO Concentration, by Model Year, of Round-1 Data.. 4-281
Figure 4-176. RSD-4000 Average NO Concentration, by Model Year, of Round-2 Data.. 4-281
xiv
-------
Figure 4-177. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison 4-283
Figure 4-178. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison 4-283
Figure 4-179. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer NOX Comparison 4-284
Figure 4-180. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison 4-284
Figure 4-181. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison 4-285
Figure 4-182. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer NOX Comparison 4-285
Figure 4-183. RSD vs. PEMS HC readings at RSD Site 21 4-288
Figure 4-184. RSD vs. PEMS CO readings RSD Site 21 4-288
Figure 4-185. RSD vs. PEMS CO2 readings RSD Site 21 4-289
Figure 4-186. RSD vs. PEMS NOX readings RSD Site 21 4-289
Figure 5-1. Data Flow During First (Raw Data) Import Phase 5-4
Figure 5-2. Data Flow During Review and Conversion Phase 5-7
xv
-------
Acronyms
ALAPCO
AMBHC
BC
BKI
BTEX
CEM
CFR
CMB
CO
C02
COVs
CPU
CRC
CSV
CVS
DAC
DMV
DNPH
DOE
DOT
DP
DR
DRI
DT
DTC
EC
EPA
ERG
ESP
FHWA
FID
GC/MS
GC-FID
GDPMS
GPS
HAP
HC
HH
HPLC
HPLC-UV
1C
ICP-MS
I/M
KCMSA
Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials
Ambient (background) Hydrocarbon
BC
Bevilacqua Knight Incorporated
Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes
Continuous Emissions Monitor
Code of Federal Regulations
Chemical Mass Balance
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon Dioxide
Coefficients of Variation
Central Processing Unit
Coordinating Research Council, Inc.
Comma-separated Variables
Constant Volume Sampler
Data Acquisition and Control
Department of Motor Vehicles
Dinitropehenylhydrazine
Department of Energy
Department of Transportation
Dew Point
DataRAM
Desert Research Institute
DustTrak
Diagnostic Trouble Code
Elemental Carbon
Environmental Protection Agency
Eastern Research Group
Environmental Systems Products
Federal Highway Administration
Flame lonization Detector
Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry
Gas Chromatography - Flame lonization Detector
Gas/Diesel PM Split Study
Global Positioning System
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Hydrocarbon
Household
High Performance Liquid Chromatography
High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography with UV Detector
Ion Chromatography
Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry
Inspection and Maintenance
Kansas City Metropolitan Statistical Area
xvi
-------
KCRHTS
KS
LDGV
LED
MARC
MDL
MO
MSA
MSAT
MSOD
NIST
NMHC
NO
NO2
NOX
NREL
OBDII
OC
ORD
PAH
PAMS
PDF
PEMS
PM
PM2.5
QA
QAPP
QC
QCM
ROD
RFP
RH
RSD
SBS
SCFM
SI
SMT
STAPPA
STN
svoc
TC
TEOM
THC
TIGF
TNMHC
TOR
Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey
State of Kansas
Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles
Light Emitting Diode
Mid-America Regional Council
Method Detection Limit
State of Missouri
Metropolitan Statistical Area
Mobile Source Air Toxic
Mobile Source Observation Database
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Non-Methane Hydrocarbon
Nitric Oxide
Nitrogen Dioxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
On-Board Diagnostics II (vehicle diagnostic system)
Organic Carbon
Office of Research and Development (EPA)
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Portable Activity Measurement System
Positive Displacement Pump
Portable Emissions Measurement System
Particulate Matter
Particulate Matter (less than 2.5 microns in diameter)
Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Quality Control
Quartz Crystal Microbalance
Random Digit Dialing
Request for Proposals
Relative Humidity
Remote Sensing Data
Second-by-Second
Standard Cubic Feet per Minute
Spark Iginition
SEMTECH
State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators
Speciation Trends Network
Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds
Total Carbon
Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance
Total Hydrocarbon
Teflon Impregnated Glass Fiber
Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbon
Thermal Optical Reflectance
xvn
-------
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
UV-VIS Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy
VI Vehicle Interface
VIN Vehicle Identification Number
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
VSP Vehicle Specific Power
XML extensible Markup Language
XRF X-Ray Fluorescence
xvin
-------
Executive Summary
Overview of Study Objectives
This program evaluates exhaust emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs)
which includes measuring particulate matter (PM) and other components of exhaust emissions
from approximately 480 randomly selected LDGVs in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. Data
obtained from this program will be used to evaluate and update existing and future mobile source
emission models (MOBILE6 and MOVES).
In an effort to understand the emissions of a fleet comprised of both new and older
vehicles, EPA has conducted numerous studies to measure emissions from a sample of vehicles
and then projected them to the population as a whole. Gaseous emissions have been studied
extensively through the last few decades, both through special studies and through analysis of
vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program data. However, particulate matter (PM)
emissions from gasoline-powered motor vehicles are less understood. Through this study EPA
has conducted a "watershed" research experiment to characterize PM emissions from a very
carefully selected random sample of vehicles in a major metropolitan area.
It should be first noted that PM is a dynamic pollutant that is constantly being influenced
by its environment therefore its formation is constantly changing both in the exhaust stream and
in the ambient air. Our tests are a snapshot using specific measurements under specific
laboratory and thermodynamic conditions. Real-world PM may differ significantly.
Many studies have tried to characterize the distribution of PM for a vehicle fleet.
However, study designs have been lacking in their focus to develop random sampling techniques
with careful attention to non-responsive behavior. For this research, the Project Sponsors have
developed the following goals:
• Characterize PM emissions distributions of a carefully selected random sample of
gasoline vehicles in Kansas City.
• Characterize gaseous and PM toxics exhaust emissions.
• Characterize the fraction of high emitters in the fleet.
In addition, there were a number of secondary goals for the study, including:
• Demonstrate the use of a cohort, and a sampling plan to select candidate vehicles;
• Test vehicles in an ambient environment close to their operating area, gather data
in summer and winter conditions;
• Refine the use of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS)
configurations for large scale implementation;
• Compare results of laboratory grade measurement devices with PEMS;
• Develop useful continuous PM measurement techniques compared to traditional
gravimetric measurement;
• Develop inventory of speciated HC constituents of vehicle exhaust in PM and
gaseous modes;
ES-1
-------
• Gather emissions and activity data on vehicles driven by their owners in real
world conditions; and
• Gather information to relate second by second vehicle driving and resulting PM
emissions for developing input data for emissions models.
Another key feature of this study was intended to identify how real-world on-board
portable emission measurement devices (PEMS) could be used to collect mass-based vehicle
emissions data. These devices were put on all vehicles tested in this project. Additionally, a
PEMS device was connected to every vehicle while it was simultaneously measured with
laboratory grade instruments on a dynamometer. EPA intends to use the results of this program
to evaluate whether PEMS devices can be a primary method to collect vehicle emissions data
around the country for use in the development of fleet emissions inventories.
The KC study was conducted in three distinct Phases. In the Pilot phase the test facility
in Kansas City was prepared and all equipment, staff, and logistics were mobilized. The team
also tested three EPA-provided "correlation" vehicles to compare EPA Ann Arbor dynamometer
laboratory measurements with those obtained using the EPA portable Clayton dynamometer at
the KC test facility. The main study was started in June 2004 and was called Round 1 testing.
During this round, approximately 250 vehicles were tested under summer conditions at the
facility. In the final testing round, Round 2, approximately 250 additional vehicles were tested
under winter conditions. Approximately 40 vehicles tested during Round 1 were re-tested in
Round 2 to compare exhaust emissions changes due to seasonal changes.
Summary of Contractor's Major Findings
This report represents the first steps in an ongoing review process that are being
presented to EPA by its contractor, ERG, on its testing procedures, observations and data
gathered under this contract. The contractor was also responsible for providing technical
assessments following standard operating procedures, review of technical assessment and to
identify any data quality issues as outlined in the statement of work and as described in the
quality assurance project plan (QAPP).
The following paragraphs state some of the contractor's major findings:
Sampling Methodology Area
One of the research goals was to carefully select a random sample of gasoline vehicles
from the Kansas City Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). This was accomplished in Round 1
by using the Mid-American Regional Council (MARC) travel survey study that was completed
in 2004 as our starting point for analysis. By comparing the MARC study to Census 2000 data
on many demographic and geographic characteristics and found it represented the Kansas City
MSA population. Within the MARC survey, 2,887 household had at least one vehicle that could
be tested in Round 1 but only 1,236 were contacted. Of those households, 221 agreed to
participate in the emission test program; 360 refused to participate; 497 could not be contact after
ES-2
-------
multiple attempts and 106 no longer had valid phone numbers. The overall response rate was
21%.
Another research question dealt with whether nonrespondents were different from
respondents. A total of 51 households were able to be converted after initially refusing to
participate in the emission test program. The contractor found little difference between
participants and refusers when looking at geographic and demographic characteristics. This
effort to recruit vehicles that had initially refused participation was only conducted during Round
1 testing.
The Round 1 households were larger and owned more vehicles (again, given that vehicle
ownership was a requirement for participation in the study, this finding was not surprising). The
Round 1 households show a good geographic dispersion and tend to reflect more moderate
income households. The Round 2 study design was similar to Round 1 and many of the
household characteristics remained relatively constant and different from the MARC and Census
data. Round 2 households were larger, owned more vehicles, reflected more moderate income
levels and most tended to own single-family residences. In contrast to Round 1, Round 2
households' geographic dispersion was less urban.
EPA will be continuing it investigation into the characteristics of the KC vehicle fleet to
hopefully get a better understanding of possible influences that might better understand factors
that we help characterize fleet emissions.
Emission Results
A major goal of the vehicle test program was to gather gaseous and parti culate matter
emissions from a randomly selected stratified vehicle sample. The contractor has presented
some of their analysis in this report. As expected, preliminary findings show that older vehicles
have higher gaseous and parti culate matter emission than newer vehicles. A major finding was
the role that temperature plays in the formation of parti culate matter. When comparing forty -
three vehicles that were tested in both Rounds but at different temperatures their particulate
matter emissions increased for all vehicle bins in Round 2. EPA will be further investigating
both the gaseous and particulate matter to determine if other parameters might also be
contributing to these emission increases and how these relate to the general vehicle fleet
population.
Dyno vs PEMS Evaluation
Another secondary goal was to investigate the capabilities of portable emission
measurement system (PEMS) to be able to measure gaseous emission accurately on wide variety
of vehicles and compare it to laboratory dynamometers. The contractor reported in their overall
summary that the PEMS device compared very favorable to the Clayton portable dynamometer
and analyzers on all gaseous measurements. EPA will be conducting further analyze between
each of the test cycle's three Phases (cold start, stabilizing and warm start) and also comparing
ES-3
-------
all vehicle tests performed between each Round. A special note needs to be made that
improvements to the PEMS software and instrumentation were made between Round 1 and
Round 2 which needs to be factored into these analysis.
RSD Data Compared to Vehicle Sample Methodology
On-road data were collected using Remote Sensing Devices (RSD) during both Rounds
of the study. The purpose of these deployments was to document the on-road fleet in the Kansas
City area and to measure on-road emissions. The contractor presented preliminary results that
compared RSD to PEMS second-by-second data connected to the dynamometer. The graphs
presented in this report indicates that there might be no major differences or offsets in the
gaseous measurements conducted between the general fleet and the fleet randomly selected for
this study. EPA will be conducting its own investigation on the data gathered during this test
program and will be releasing its conclusions in the near future.
Continuous PM Measurements Results
During this study, different types of analytical equipment were used to measure black
carbon and total particle mass on a second-by-second basis. Particle mass was obtained using a
DustTrak nephelometer, DataRAM4, and a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). The contractor
was able to provide some preliminary findings on these devices.
The contractor found that the black carbon rates generally decreased from older to newer
vehicles. The black carbon rates and the DustTrak were generally higher for cars during the
LA92's first Phase when compared to the other two Phases. The contractor noticed that the
DataRAM4 PM emission rates were in great excess of those obtained with the DustTrak except
for those cases where vehicles had low emission rates. The contractor concluded that the
DataRAM4 might have a problem with high concentrations where the optics measurement
probably gets dirty, and adds to a scattered signal that gets interpreted erroneously as PM.
The contractor also compared the QCM to PM emission rates and noted that with
the exception of Pre-1981 Cars, the QCM reports a higher emission rate than the gravimetric
filter. Also the emission rate for the Pre-1981 Trucks was also shown to be less than the Pre-
1981 gravimetric filters. Improvements to the QCM equipment occurred between the two
Rounds which was not been taken into consideration in this contractor's report. EPA will be
conducting its own investigation on the data gathered during this test program and will be
releasing its conclusions in the near future.
Particulate-Phase Emissions Speciation from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles
Full chemical speciation was determined for 26 individual/composite samples and 6
composite dilution tunnel blank samples in each test Round. The contractor's summary analysis
can be found in this report which shows that emissions levels from individual/composite vehicle
ES-4
-------
testing were well above the ranges of values for dilution tunnel blanks with the exception of
hopanes and steranes emissions for the newer model-year strata. The contractor found that three
PAHs could be potential markers for gasoline exhaust are indeno[123-cd]pyrene,
benzo(ghi)perylene and coronene.
The contractor used the comparison of co-pollutants for assessing the overall accuracy
and validity of the measurements. The contractor found that PM mass and total carbon (TC) are
strongly correlated for the Phase 1 samples and poorly correlated for the lightly loaded Phase 3
samples. Similar results were obtained for elemental carbon (EC) measured by Thermal Optical
Reflectance (TOR) versus average black carbon (BC) by the photoacoustic instrument. The
contractor also noted when comparing to previous studies (e.g., Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study)
for highly loaded samples, PM mass is typically well correlated with TC and EC obtained by
IMPROVE-TOR or STN-TOT agree with photoacoustic BC. That is not the case at lower sample
loading where sampling artifacts associated with adsorbed organic compounds on the quartz
filter may be relatively more important. The correlations of the sum of elements by X-Ray
Fluorescence (XRF) analysis show the similar correlations to PM mass as TC, which again
reflects the lower mass loadings for the Phase 3 samples. The contractor found that sulfur by
XRF analysis is strongly correlated to sulfate by ion chromatography. It was shown that
benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno[123-cd]pyrene and coronene all correlate well with TC emissions
and that the sum of hopanes and steranes also correlated well with TC.
The contractor found abundances of various chemical species in the dilution blank and
composite exhaust samples during each round of testing. Organic carbon (OC) and EC are the
most abundant species in motor vehicle exhaust, accounting for over 95% of the total PM mass.
For spark ignition (SI) vehicles, BC and PM emission rates can be several times larger during the
cold start phase than during hot stabilized operation. Relatively clean SI vehicles produce BC
emissions during the more aggressive portions of the driving cycle and during cold starts.
Therefore, the emission profiles for clean SI vehicles from dynamometer tests may contain
higher fractions of EC than would be produced in congested urban driving conditions. PM
emissions from SI high-emitter contain predominantly OC. Variability of emissions from a
vehicle may be as great as the difference between vehicles, particularly for the high emitters.
The contractor found an abundances of individual organic species relative to total mass or carbon
are generally consistent from profile to profile for organic and elemental carbon, PAH, hopanes
& steranes, and nitroPAH. Alkanes and polars appear too variable to be useful for receptor
modeling. Gasoline vehicles, whether low or high emitters, emit higher proportions of high
molecular-weight particulate PAHs (e.g., benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene,
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, and coronene). Hopanes and steranes are markers for lubricating oil
from internal combustion engines, and their emission rates were higher for high emitting
vehicles. EPA will be conducting its own investigation on the data gathered during this test
program and will be releasing its conclusions in the near future.
Gaseous-Phase Emissions Speciation from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles
Volatile organic compounds (VOC) chemical speciation was determined for the
individual/composite samples and composite dilution tunnel blank samples. The contractor field-
blank corrected all data and reported all their findings in this report. The contractor performed a
validity check by comparing the total nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) values from the DRI
ES-5
-------
VOC speciation samples to the corresponding data obtained by Bevilacqua Knight Incorporated
(BKI). With the exception of two obvious outliers (SI-2 and S5-4), were shown to have good
agreement for the uncomposited samples from Round 1. However, the contractor found that
there was not agreement with Round 2. Further investigation, revealed a sampling train was
disconnected from the main sampling line and capped off during some temperature experiments
conducted between the Rounds.
The contractor developed a methodology for reconstructing the missing VOC speciation
data by first calculating the ratios of reported concentration of each hydrocarbon compound to
the total HC reported for each run. These ratios were then averaged for all valid canister samples
and the resulting average and standard deviation of the ratios were used to estimate the
hydrocarbon speciation for the invalid samples based on the total HC from BKI's bag samples.
The contractor included this data in a separate table for its review.
The contractor found that that the distributions in emission rates for BTEX and
formaldehyde show that newer model year vehicles are generally clean and that emissions of
older vehicles are highly variable with some vehicles emitting BTEX and formaldehyde at rates
exceeding that of normal emitters by more than two orders of magnitude. The contractor found
an abundance of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes are similar among the samples and
between Rounds 1 and 2. There also seems to be a strong correlation among related aromatic
hydrocarbon species for all exhaust composites. EPA will be expanding its review of this data
and will be conducting further analysis to make a better determination on all of these preliminary
findings.
Next Steps in EPA's Data Review and Analysis
This contractor's report did not directly answer the main objectives of the study but the
contractor provided EPA with enough quality assurances and checks for EPA to start address
them. EPA will take this contractor's report and will be reviewing its data and conducting its
own comprehensive review and evaluation on the observations and data gathered during the
study. EPA will release this report and data to the general public after receiving approval from
our sponsors. EPA will also be comparing this data with other know emission test programs
conducted by other testing organizations and by ourselves as part of its comprehensive review
and will be releasing its findings in subsequent reports in its efforts better understand and address
its use in the development of our models and regulations.
ES-6
-------
ES-7
-------
Overview of Test Program Results
Overview of Sample Selection and Recruiting
The recruitment process required deriving a targeted (stratified) sample of vehicles from
a cohort of 2000 households generated through random sampling in the Kansas City
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The Mid-American Regional Council (MARC) completed
a comprehensive travel survey of Kansas City regional households in spring of 2004. l That
study's resulting dataset was reviewed for use as the initial cohort of households.
The use of the MARC 2004 Household Travel Study (MARC Study) as the cohort from
which to recruit vehicles allowed vehicle recruitment to begin earlier than planned in Round 1.
It also provided, inherent in the data set, household data elements including year, make, model,
body type, and fuel type for each household vehicle, home address and preferred method for
contacting them. One of the challenges of Round 1 testing was that there were fewer than
expected older vehicles available for recruitment. In fact, by the end of Round 1 testing, the
available vehicle pool for recruiting the oldest vehicles (Pre-1981 and 1981-1990 trucks and
cars) had been virtually exhausted. This posed a challenge for Round 2 testing. Fortunately, the
Kansas and Missouri Vehicle Registration database provided a large pool of vehicles that can be
sampled and recruited for testing. That database was used to draw representative stratified
random samples for recruiting as many vehicles as necessary to achieve the desired sampling
targets.
Meeting the study goals required deriving a targeted (stratified) sample of vehicles from a
cohort of 2000 households generated through random sampling in the KCMSA. The
methodology for generating the sample originally called for conducting a Random Digit Dialing
(RDD) telephone survey of households (HH) in the KCMSA. This methodology relied on two
key underlying assumptions:
• An RDD sample of HHs will generate a representative sample of the population
in the Kansas City MSA, and
• The cohort of HHs participating in the RDD survey will provide a representative
sample of vehicles for emissions testing.
Because ERG team member NuStats had recently completed the 2004 Kansas City Travel
Behavior Survey for MARC, the use of the survey data (conducted in Spring 2004 using an RDD
sample design) was recommended. NuStats conducted a comparison of the MARC data with
Census 2000 data at the household and person levels using a number of demographic and
geographic characteristics. As evidenced in Tables OS-1 and OS-2, using the MARC RDD
sample to create a cohort of households satisfactorily represented the Kansas City MSA
population on a number of demographic / geographic characteristics. 2
1 Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, http://www.marc.org/transportation/pdf/travelsurvev2003.pdf
The MARC survey distributions are unweighted (or raw), allowing for more informed assessment of the product of RDD
sampling. It should be noted that survey data are typically weighted to correct for discrepancies between known Census
population distributions (for selected demographic variables) and the unweighted survey results. But a comparison of weighted
survey data and the Census distributions would mask any real differences between survey and Census distributions for those
OS-1
-------
In the process of conducting the MARC household travel survey (which forms the
foundation of the cohort for the EPA Emissions Testing Project), NuStats randomly sampled and
contacted 5,500 regional households. Of these, 4,001 agreed to provide their information and
3,049 ultimately completed all aspects of the survey. Non-respondents are those 1,500
households that were contacted and firmly refused to participate.
A discussion of the characteristics of those 1,500 households that chose not to participate
is very limited. Most refusals took place during the introduction to the study, prior to the
interviewer obtaining any demographic information about the household. The only item that can
be reviewed is the geographic distribution of refusers, since all sampled telephone numbers were
initially flagged with the anticipated county of residence. This distribution is shown in Table
OS-3, and the proportion of refusals matched the proportion of participants by county of
residence.
Of those 4,001 households that agreed to participate in the MARC survey, 2,887 with at
least one vehicle comprised the Round 1 sample. Of those, a total of 1,236 were contacted about
participation in this Round 1 emissions testing effort. Of these households, 221 ultimately
agreed to participate in the survey. The remainder either refused to participate (360), could not
be contacted after multiple attempts (497), or their phone numbers were no longer valid (106).
On average, each household was attempted 2.8 times. The overall response rate for the study
was 21%.
demographic variables that were used in generating the weighting adjustments. Thus, the survey data used in the comparison
were not weighted.
OS-2
-------
Table OS-1. Demographic Comparison of MARC ROD Survey of Households and
Census 2000 Distributions
Demographic Characteristic
Household size
1
2
3
4+
total
HH Vehicles
0
1
2
3+
total
HH Income
<15k
15k - < 25k
25k - < 50k
50k - < 100k
100k +
(refusal)
total
Residency Type
single family
all other
total
Race
White
Black/ African American
Other
total
Respondent Age
<20
20-24
25-54
55-64
65 +
refusal
total
ROD Survey (n=4,001)
26.8%
33.3%
16.0%
23.9%
100.0%
5.8%
32.9%
42.7%
18.6%
100.0%
9.9%
10.2%
30.2%
35.9%
13.8%
(5.9%)
100.0%
76.8%
23.2%
100.0%
81.3%
10.7%
8.0%
100.0%
29.6%
4.3%
43.3%
9.9%
12.8%
(1.2%)
100%
Census 2000
27.4%
33.0%
16.2%
23.4%
100.0%
7.4%
33.9%
41.7%
17.0%
100.0%
12.2%
11.3%
30.1%
33.6%
12.8%
—
100.0%
69.0%
31.0%
100.0%
81.6%
14.1%
4.3%
100.0%
29.1%
6.1%
45.3%
8.2%
11.3%
—
100.0%
OS-3
-------
Table OS-2. Comparison of MARC ROD Survey and Census 2000 Geographic
Distributions
County, State:
Cass County, MO
Clay County, MO
Jackson County, MO
Platte County, MO
Johnson County, KS
Leavenworth County, KS
Wyandotte County, KS
total
Census 2000
4.6%
11.1%
40.6%
4.5%
26.6%
3.5%
9.1%
100%
ROD Survey (N = 4,001)
4.9%
12.3%
39.9%
4.6%
26.1%
3.3%
8.9%
100%
Table OS-3. MARC Household Survey Non-Respondents and Respondents by
County of Residence
County
Johnson County, KS
Leavenworth County, KS
Wyandotte County, KS
Clay County, MO
Cass County, MO
Jackson County, MO
Platte County, MO
Non-Responders
29.7%
3.6%
7.8%
5.5%
12.5%
37.5%
3.5%
Respondents
26.4%
3.1%
8.6%
4.8%
12.3%
40.4%
4.5%
Source: Non-Respondents based on Sample File for the Kansas City Regional
Household Travel Survey (KCRHTS), unweighted. Includes all households that
refused to participate in the study. Respondent proportion reflects the weighted
distribution of households participating in the survey.
Of the 221 households that ultimately had their vehicles tested, 23 had initially refused to
participate during the recruitment call but were converted after another focused attempt. An
additional 29 households cancelled their initial scheduled testing, but agreed again to have the
vehicle tested later during Round 1. Tables OS-4 and OS-5 compare the Round 1 participants vs.
those that refused testing in terms of the county of residence, income, and vehicles owned. In
terms of county of residence, the refusers were most likely to come from Jackson County,
Johnson County, or Cass County. However, there was very little difference in the proportions of
refusers and regular participants by county of residence. This effort to recruit vehicles that had
initially refused participation was designed to be only a part of Round 1 testing.
OS-4
-------
Table OS-4. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by County of Residence
County
Johnson County, KS
Leavenworth County, KS
Wyandotte County, KS
Clay County, MO
Cass County, MO
Jackson County, MO
Platte County, MO
Refusers
22.2%
2.2%
9.5%
6.0%
14.0%
43.2%
2.9%
Regular Participants
25.6%
6.4%
10.4%
4.8%
9.6%
40.0%
3.2%
Source: Non-Respondents based on unweighted KCRHTS data for
refusers and regular participants in Round 1 of the study.
The refusers were more likely to report a lower income than that reported by regular
participants (22% compared to 16%, respectively).
Table OS-5. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Income Level
Income
<15,000
15,000 -< 25,000
25,000 - <50,000
50,000 - < 75,000
75,000-<100,000
100,000+
Refusers
8.8%
13.5%
35.5%
18.9%
14.5%
8.8%
Regular Participants
4.9%
10.6%
37.4%
20.3%
17.9%
8.9%
Source: Non-Respondents based on unweighted KCRHTS
data for refusers and regular participants in Round 1 of
the study.
Section 3.2 of the main body of the report defines the study cohort as being derived from
the MARC 2004 household travel study sample, and demonstrates that the MARC sample
represented the KCMSA. In evaluating below the MARC sample with the Rounds 1 and 2
participant characteristics and the 2000 Census data for the study area, the first comparison is on
key household characteristics, including household size, vehicles, household workers, household
income, residence type, and home ownership as shown in Table OS-6. This table shows the raw
and weighted MARC sample characteristics, the raw Rounds 1 and 2 participant characteristics,
and the 2000 Census data for the study area.
OS-5
-------
Table OS-6. MARC Household Characteristics Compared to Census
Characteristic
MARC
Raw Data
MARC
Weighted Data
EPA
Round
IData
EPA
Round 2
MARC
Data Only
Round 1
& Round
2
Census
Data
Household Size
1
2
3
4+
28.40%
34.00%
15.80%
21.80%
27.50%
32.90%
16.20%
23.50%
16.80%
32.80%
14.40%
36.00%
7.06%
36.47%
20.00%
36.47%
10.84%
34.94%
18.07%
36.14%
27.40%
32.90%
16.20%
23.50%
Household Vehicles
0
1
2
3+
5.30%
32.00%
44.20%
18.50%
Household Vehicles
1
2
3+
33.79%
46.67%
19.54%
7.40%
33.90%
41.70%
17.00%
0.00%
12.80%
44.80%
42.40%
0.00%
10.59%
54.12%
35.29%
0.00%
12.05%
49.40%
38.55%
7.40%
33.90%
41.70%
17.00%
(Reweighted from above to include households with 1-3+
vehicles)
36.61%
45.03%
18.36%
12.80%
44.80%
42.40%
10.59%
54.12%
35.29%
12.05%
49.40%
38.55%
36.61%
45.03%
18.36%
Geography
Urban
Suburban 1st Ring
Remainder
18.50%
26.20%
55.20%
20.60%
26.00%
53.40%
23.20%
28.80%
48.00%
12.94%
25.88%
61.18%
16.87%
29.52%
53.61%
20.60%
26.00%
53.40%
Household Income
<$15k
$15k-<$25k
$25k- < $50k
$50k-<$100k
$100k +
Income refusals
8.90%
9.50%
29.70%
37.60%
14.40%
5.50%
9.60%
9.70%
29.80%
36.10%
13.70%
5.50%
4.80%
10.40%
36.80%
37.60%
8.80%
1.60%
3. 53%
7.06%
31.76%
40.00%
12.94%
4.71%
4.22%
7.83%
34.34%
40.36%
10.84%
2.41%
12.20%
11.30%
30.10%
33.60%
12.80%
~
Residence Type
Single family
All other types
78.40%
21.60%
76.90%
23.10%
87.20%
12.80%
91.76%
8.24%
87.95%
12.05%
69.00%
31.00%
Source: 2000 Census and Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey (KCRHTS), weighted. As documented in the Kansas
City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, the data were weighted by household size, household vehicles, and
geography (home location). Round 1 & Round 2 participants are summarized using raw KCRHTS data as the EPA surveys
didn't obtain demographic information.
OS-6
-------
• MARC Sample: For the most part, the weighted data compare favorably with the
census data, indicating that the survey data set is representative of the regional
population. The difference in the distribution of respondents based on residence
type can be explained somewhat based on the proportion of sample types used in
the study. Listed telephone numbers (those with complete address information for
the household) are typically associated with households of longer tenure, which is
correlated with living in a single-family dwelling and home ownership. Renters,
who are considered to be more transient and living in housing types not
characterized as single-family dwellings, may change telephone numbers more
often and are typically more likely to have a number that is incomplete or not
included in the listed telephone number database. The proportion of listed to not
listed sample used in this study was 50/50, meaning that of the 40,000 pieces of
sample used, 20,000 were associated with listed numbers and 20,000 were not.
An effort more focused on renters would have required the use of more unlisted
than listed numbers, which was not possible within the project's budget. Thus,
the desire to achieve a good mix of residence type was balanced with the project
budget and as a result, residence type came within 10% of the census parameters,
but not within 5% like the other variables.
• Round 1 Participants. The Round 1 study design called for testing a specific
combination of vehicles based on type (car vs. truck) and age. The testing goals
were disproportionate to survey universe parameters, with a higher focus on older
vehicles. In addition, only MARC households that owned vehicles could be
considered for inclusion in the study. For comparison purposes, we have
excluded households with 0 vehicles in one of the comparisons presented in Table
OS-6. As a result of these various study parameters, the characteristics of the
Round 1 households differs somewhat from those of the MARC and Census data.
The Round 1 households were larger and owned more vehicles (again, given that
vehicle ownership was a requirement for participation in the study, this finding
was not surprising). The Round 1 households show a good geographic dispersion
and tend to reflect more moderate income households. In terms of home
ownership, there is a significantly higher proportion living in single-family
residences. However, as with the main MARC survey, home ownership is a
secondary variable of interest so this is not of great concern.
• Round 2 Participants. The Round 2 study design was similar to Round 1 and
many of the household characteristics remained relatively constant and different
from the MARC and Census data. Round 2 households were larger, owned more
vehicles, reflected more moderate income levels and most tended to own single-
family residences. In contrast to Round 1, Round 2 households' geographic
dispersion was less urban.
Table OS-7 shows that the key person characteristics of MARC age and ethnicity also
track the census fairly well. The higher proportion of "other" ethnicities reflects Hispanic
respondents who identified themselves as such in answer to this question. With regard to the
Rounds 1 and 2 data, the participants tend to be younger, on average. In terms of ethnicity, the
Rounds 1 and 2 participants mirror the census extremely well.
OS-7
-------
Table OS-7. MARC Person Characteristics Compared To Census
Characteristic
MARC
Raw
Data
MARC
Weighted
Data
EPA
Round 1
Data
EPA
Round 2
MARC
Data
Only
Round 1
& Round 2
Census
Data
Respondent Age
<20
20-24
25-54
55-64
65+
Respondent Ethnicity
White
Black/African American
Other
28.70%
3.60%
42.30%
10.60%
14.80%
84.80%
9.10%
6.10%
30.30%
3.60%
41.70%
9.80%
14.60%
83.40%
10.20%
6.40%
55.94%
6.64%
74.48%
15.38%
10.14%
79.20%
12.80%
8.00%
53.94%
5.45%
70.91%
20.61%
8.48%
84.71%
10.59%
4.71%
53.90%
5.84%
72.08%
18.51%
9.42%
82.53%
11.45%
6.02%
29.10%
6.10%
45.30%
8.20%
11.30%
81.60%
14.10%
4.30%
Source: 2000 Census and Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey (KCRHTS), weighted. As documented
in the Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, the data were weighted by household size,
household vehicles, and geography (home location). Round 1 participants are summarized using raw KCRHTS data
as the EPA surveys didn't obtain demographic information.
In addition to this MARC census comparison, ERG performed a comparison of the
sample fleet with the KC fleet based on remote sensing measurements, in order to evaluate
sample fleet and emissions relative to the KC fleet. The results of this analysis are provided later
in this executive summary.
Testing Performed in Kansas City
The vehicle emissions tests were conducted in Kansas City using a LA-92 test cycle
which consists of a cold start Phase 1 (first 310 seconds), a stabilized Phase 2 (311-1427 second),
a 600-second engine off soak, and a warm start Phase 3 (repeat of Phase 1 of the LA92).
Concentration and mass-based THC (total hydrocarbon), CO, CC>2, and NOx emissions
measurements were gathered for study vehicles using EPA's Clayton Model CTE-50-0 portable
CVS chassis dynamometer. In addition to the regulated gas pollutants measured via CVS,
continuous measurements of PM mass were taken using an EPA-supplied Booker Systems
Model RPM-101 Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and Thermo-MIE Inc. DataRAM 4000
Nephelometer. BC was measured continuously with a DRI photoacoustic instrument and
integrated samples were collected and analyzed by DRI for PM gravimetric mass, elements,
elemental and organic carbon, ions, particulate and semi-volatile organic compounds, and
volatile organic air toxics. The samples were extracted from the dilution tunnel through a low
particulate loss 2.5 |j,m cutpoint pre-classifier.
A major goal of the vehicle test program in Kansas City was to obtain up-to-date exhaust
composition profiles of gasoline-powered vehicles for application in developing speciated
OS-8
-------
emissions inventories and ambient source apportionment studies. An important issue in the
general applicability of these vehicle exhaust composition provides as measured in Kansas City
is determining whether gas-particle partitioning of certain organic compounds with the high-
volume source sampling used in Kansas City differs substantially from the low-flow, ambient
sampling techniques used in some source apportionment studies. To address this issue, organic
samples were also collected during a portion of the second round of the study using ambient,
low-flow samplers to compare with high-volume organic samples collected in the study.
Laboratory and on-road measurements of THC, CO, CO2, andNOx emission
concentrations and mass rates, along with OBD datastream information (when available) and
vehicle activity data (via GPS) were gathered using eight portable emissions measurement
systems (PEMS) provided by the USEPA. These systems, the SEMTECH-G manufactured by
Sensors, Inc. were used to measure vehicle emissions concurrently with the dynamometer as the
vehicle was receiving its LA-92 test.
The day prior to receiving the LA-92 dynamometer test, each study vehicle was driven on
a pre-established "conditioning" route (similar in speed, acceleration, and distance to the LA-92
test). This conditioning drive allowed all vehicles to be similarly conditioned prior to
dynamometer testing. PEMS instruments were used to measure THC, CO, CO2, and NOx
emissions information and activity data on all study vehicles as they were driven on their
conditioning routes. Occasionally, study vehicles were unsuitable for dynamometer testing
(generally vehicles that were too long or wide for the dynamometer of vehicles equipped with
all-time all-wheel-drive). These "conditioning route" drives were also performed on these
vehicles equipped with PEMS devices which allowed emissions information to be gathered on
all study vehicles, regardless of dynamometer test eligibility.
In addition to PEMS measurements made during conditioning runs and dynamometer
testing, over 60 program participants also participated in "driveaway" testing. This involved
installing a PEMS unit on the participant's vehicle, driving the vehicle on the conditioning run,
and then releasing the vehicle to the participant. The participant was encouraged to drive the
vehicle as much as possible (i.e., by running their weekly errands), and to operate the vehicle as
they normally would. This allowed activity, emissions, and fuel economy information to be
gathered under "real-world" on-road driving conditions. The PEMS units continued to operate
until the battery supply was depleted, typically 6 to 8 hours of operation.
In addition to the on-road activity data measured using PEMS instruments, activity
dataloggers manufactured by Ease, Inc. were also used to gather activity data over a period of
approximately one week on several study vehicles. However, these dataloggers weren't
available until late during the second round of the study, limiting the amount of activity-only
data gathered.
During both Rounds of the study, on-road data were collected using Environmental
Systems Products (ESP)-supplied RSD equipment and personnel from the Saint Louis Clean
Screen program. Two versions of RSD equipment were utilized for this study, the RSD 3000
(which is used in the St. Louis Clean Screen program), and the newer generation RSD 4000.
OS-9
-------
Fuel samples and oil samples were also gathered from all study vehicles, and sent to the
USEPA NVFEL laboratory for analysis.
Summary of Results and Conclusions
It should be first noted that PM is a dynamic pollutant that is constantly being influenced
by its environment therefore its formation is constantly changing both in the exhaust stream and
in the ambient air. Our tests are a snapshot using specific measurements under specific
laboratory and thermodynamic conditions. Real-world PM may differ significantly.
As mentioned above, all vehicles tested during the KC project were subjected to many on
road and dynamometer tests. Measurements made during these tests are detailed in Section 4 of
the main report. A summary is provided below. For brevity, only a summary of primarily the
PM data is presented in this executive summary; all other pollutants are discussed in Section 4.
Round 1 vehicle testing targets and actual vehicles tested on the dynamometer are shown
in Table OS-8. Although the total number of vehicles dynamometer tested exceeded project
goals, several strata targets were not achieved (most notable in bins 1 and 5). The MARC
vehicle database was solely used for vehicle recruitment (via random digit dialing, or ROD) for
Round 1 recruiting. This database was supplemented with the Kansas City registration database
after Round 1 to help recover these shortfalls during Round 2 recruiting.
Table OS-8. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 1
Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vehicle
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
Group
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Total
Round 1
Goal
16
26
26
39
16
51
34
42
250
Round 1
Tested
2
21
18
39
6
49
39
87
261
%of
Goal
13%
81%
69%
100%
38%
96%
115%
207%
104%
Table OS-9 lists the various tests conducted during Round 1, in comparison with project
goals. PEMS testing on conditioning runs was performed on all vehicles, regardless of
dynamometer eligibility.
OS-10
-------
Table OS-9. Round 1 Tests Conducted
Test Type
PEMS Conditioning Test
Replicate PEMS Conditioning Test
PEMS Driveaway Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test Replicate
Dynamometer/PEMS Control Vehicle Test
Round 1 Goal
All
1 per week
N/A
250
1 per week
1 per week
Round 1 Tested
284
17
13
261
15
12
In order to better achieve strata-specific test targets during Round 2 testing, the MARC
database used for Round 1 recruiting was supplemented with the KC registration database for
Round 2 recruiting of Bins, 1, 2, 5, and 6. As can be seen in Table OS-10, this significantly
improved recruiting efforts.
Table OS-11 lists the various tests conducted during Round 2, in comparison with project
goals. Regardless of dynamometer test eligibility, PEMS tests (on the conditioning run) were
performed on all vehicles (excluding vehicles whose interiors would not accommodate a PEMS
device).
Table OS-10. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 2
(excluding Round 1 Retest Vehicles)
Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vehicle
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
Group
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Total
Round 2
Goal
10
37
30
47
15
34
36
27
236
Round 2
Tested
9
29
31
50
14
36
37
29
235
%of
Goal
90
78
103
106
93
106
103
107
100
Table OS-11. Round 2 Tests Conducted
Test Type
PEMS Conditioning Test (excluding replicates)
Replicate PEMS Conditioning Test
PEMS Driveaway Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test (excluding replicates)
Dynamometer/PEMS Test (Round IRetests)
Dynamometer/PEMS Test Replicate
Dynamometer/PEMS Control Vehicle Test
PAMS Driveaway Test
Round 2 Goal
All
1 per week
50
236
25
1 per week
1 per week
N/A
Round 2 Tested
324
19
51
235
42
11
12
8
OS-11
-------
Review of PM Emissions Trends
Figures OS-1 and OS-3 present composite PM2.5 dynamometer measurements from
Rounds land 2, respectively, classified by vehicle type and model year. Plots for all other criteria
pollutants are presented in Section 4. As expected, newer vehicles have lower PM2.5 emissions,
and vehicle age appears to have a stronger influence on PM2 5 emissions than vehicle type. The
variability of emissions for vehicles in the same selection bin is also demonstrated by the plot.
Figures OS-2 and OS-4 present overlay plots of the percent projected-fleet distribution of
composite PM2.5 emissions from Rounds 1 and 2. Using both the Kansas City fleet distribution
data complied for each vehicle testing stratum (vehicles taken from Kansas City vehicle
registration list) and actual Rounds land 2 vehicle tested stratum distribution (actual vehicle
recruited into the dynamometer testing program) we can project a simulated fleet distribution. A
solid line represents cumulative percent projected-fleet distribution, while a dashed line
represents percent projected-fleet distribution. The horizontal dashed line is a reference line that
represents the maximum PM value (80 mg/mile) for Tier 1 vehicles tested under the Federal Test
Procedure (approximately between model years 1996 - 2003). The PM2 5 distribution shows
that more than 95 percent of the fleet has PM2.5 emission rates lower than 80 mg/mile. This
simulation is applied here for QA/QC purposes only and not for modeling purposes. It provides
some insight to the effectiveness of the recruitment process to acquire vehicles that emit high PM
emissions.
OS-12
-------
Composite (Log Scale)
S3
D>
3
G
C
o
O
A.Truck— Pre 1981 B.Truok—1981—1990 CXlruck—1991-1996 D.Truok—1996—Newer ECar—Pre 1981 ECar—1981—199O GLCar-1991—1996 KCar—1996—Newer
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
/proJMCui
RouidlAidDFII—BKLsas 26JUL06 1621
Figure OS-1. Round 1 - PM2.s Emissions by Class-Year Bin
OS-13
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
16
14
13
12
n
10
Log Gravimetric PM2.5 Emission (mg/mile)
/prcfl/ICmaCWAn^MRouidttdDRI-BKUas 26JUUD6 1621
Figure OS-2. Round 1 - Percent Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.s
OS-14
-------
100OO
MX
1
«
D_
O
w
o
3
Composite (Log Scale)
o
O
o
0
G
Figure OS-3. Round 2 - PM2.s Emissions by Class-Year Bin
C
A.1hiok-Pie 1981 B.lhnk-1981-1990 C.Huok-1991-1996 D.ltuok-1996-NewEr ECar-Pie19BI F.Car-1981-1990 OCar-1991-1996 H.Car-1996-Newer
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
I2BAXD61K26
OS-15
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log Gravimetric PM2.5 Emission (mg/mile)
HDRI-BKUa 26JUU6 W26
Figure OS-4. Round 2 - Percent Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.s
OS-16
-------
RSD Data Collection
On-road data were collected using Remote Sensing Devices (RSD) during both Rounds
of the study. The purpose of these deployments was to document the on-road fleet in the Kansas
City area and to measure on-road emissions. ERG subcontracted with Environmental Systems
Products (ESP) to collect RSD data for this project. ESP used RSD equipment and personnel
from the Saint Louis Clean Screen program. They also deployed a newer generation of RSD
equipment (RSD 4000, as opposed to the older generation RSD 3000) in parallel to the
equipment from their St. Louis program, so side-by-side data were collected using both
generations of equipment. Note that for Round 2, only RSD 4000 equipment was used.
During Round 1 of the study, RSD sampling was conducted at eight sites. The ESP team
collected data during 5-consecutive days in each of July, August, and September 2004. During
Round 2, the ESP team collected RSD data at 5 sites during 5-consecutive days in each of
January, February, and March of 2005.
Fleet model year distributions are presented in Section 4. The RSD measurements
provided an opportunity to compare the vehicles which were tested in the KC project with the
general Kansas City fleet. Even though different vehicles were contained in the two groups, the
following analysis compares the individual vehicles of the same vintage in approximately similar
driving conditions. ERG performed a comparison of RSD data collected in the Kansas City area
with second-by-second (SBS) observations from the PEMS unit connected to the dynamometer.
Thousands of RSD observations yielded VINs, speed, acceleration, and concentrations of
HC, CO, and NOx for a wide variety of vehicles in the Kansas City fleet. This data, along with
measured RSD site grades and vehicle weights from the ERG VIN Decoder, were used to
calculate vehicle specific power (VSP) for each instantaneous observation. The calculation was
based on equations used by EPA in MOVES2004, using SAS code provided by Jim Warila.
The same calculations were performed on second-by-second observations obtained from
a PEMS unit on the dynamometer. Having determined VSP for each instantaneous observation,
the data was segregated by model year VSP bins for further analysis. Since the valid VSP range
for RSD is 5 to 20 kW/tonne, only those measurements were retained. The VSP bins were
created using ranges of 6 - 9, 9 - 12, and 12-18 kW/tonne. All dynamometer test cycle's Phase
data gathered during Round 1 was used except data gathered during Phase 1 of the LA92 test
were dropped, since these would represent cold-start emissions, a scenario unlikely at the RSD
sites selected for this study.
For each model year -VSP bin combination, the mean and variance of HC, CO, and NOx
were calculated for both RSD and SBS data sets. For the SBS data, for a given bin, a test
vehicle's measurements were averaged first, then the average of the averages were calculated to
produce the cell average.
Graphs of pollutant concentrations of RSD versus Dyno SBS for CO, and CO2 for
Rounds 1 and 2 are provided in Figures OS-5 through OS-8.
OS-17
-------
3,0- '
i.5-
Round 1 — CO Comparison between RSD and DYN
(Tar tap bins H-9, 9-12, 12-1B)
8
a.D-l
Mann QTTJ
Figure OS-5. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison
OS-18
-------
Round 1 - CU2 Comparison between RSD and
(Tar tap bins B-9, 9-12, !2-1fl>
o
3
S.
is-l
• • -X" -X
>r , •*<•*
Mean DYN parcCO2
Figure OS-6. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison
Round Z - CO Comparison between RSD and DYN
(Tnr uip bins B-3,.9—12, !2-1fl>
J.O-
i.5-
8
Ef
Wean DYN percCO
Figure OS-7. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison
OS-19
-------
Round 2 - CD2 Comparison between RSD and
far tap bins 6-9,9-12, 12-1B}
o
3
B.
Mean DYN percCCZ
Figure OS-8. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison
Round 1 Summer Regulated Pollutants
Two hundred eighty-one vehicles were tested during Round 1. Their emissions results are
summarized below in Table OS-12. This data has been aggregated together from the second-by-
second files gathered from the BKI's laboratory analyzers for each individual vehicle's test
phase and composite. Each vehicle's data was then average together within other vehicle data in
each bin. This data has not been corrected for possible different ambient temperatures that the
vehicle was conditioned and tested at.
OS-20
-------
Table OS-12. Round 1 Average Emission Data for Each Vehicle Bin including
Individual Phase and Composite Test
Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vehicle
Type
Truck
Pre-1981
Truck
1981-1990
Truck
1991-1995
Truck
1996+
Car
Pre-1981
Car
1981-1990
Car
1991-1995
Car
1996+
Phase
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
THC
g/mile
17.04
6.06
8.54
1.89
8.69
2.58
5.06
0.94
4.30
0.47
1.33
0.31
2.05
0.11
0.31
0.12
17.66
7.45
11.85
2.20
5.70
1.25
2.62
0.53
3.37
0.34
0.94
0.24
2.00
0.08
0.20
0.11
CO
g/mile
203.52
64.94
68.45
19.81
80.01
41.25
51.87
10.70
34.66
6.62
11.96
2.88
14.10
2.12
3.55
1.04
250.41
113.63
137.86
30.18
43.34
15.72
21.62
4.76
25.78
8.53
10.01
2.58
12.76
2.81
2.78
1.00
CO2
g/mile
859.57
594.34
647.32
136.89
684.90
408.36
528.49
100.75
770.23
476.13
636.71
118.96
815.98
480.59
648.30
121.88
676.00
407.01
515.28
100.38
647.44
388.74
527.28
98.69
634.01
377.44
510.75
95.67
634.13
366.91
492.57
93.51
NOx
g/mile
2.84
2.92
2.9
0.6
4.02
2.29
2.65
0.56
4.19
1.89
2.54
0.52
1.99
0.51
0.79
0.18
2.61
2.72
2.87
0.56
4.20
2.61
3.33
0.64
2.92
1.16
1.61
0.34
1.87
0.42
0.60
0.16
PM
mg/mile
87.80
45.05
9.14
44.80
93.80
37.85
51.05
48.70
14.48
11.13
14.41
12.37
9.58
4.01
2.33
4.21
160.77
73.09
63.73
77.09
35.02
18.94
8.79
19.24
11.43
7.54
5.08
8.22
7.40
2.48
1.80
2.86
OS-21
-------
Round 2 Winter Regulated Pollutants
Two hundred ninety-seven vehicles were tested during Round 2. Their emissions results are
summarized below in Table OS-13. This data has been aggregated together from the second-by-
second files gathered from the BKI's laboratory analyzers for each individual vehicle's test
phase and composite. Each vehicle's data was then average together within other vehicle data in
each bin. This data has not been corrected for possible different ambient temperatures that the
vehicle was conditioned and tested at.
OS-22
-------
Table OS-13. Round 2 Average Emission Data for Each Vehicle Bin including
Individual Phase and Composite Test
Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vehicle
Type
Truck
Pre-1981
Truck
1981-1990
Truck
1991-1995
Truck
1996+
Car
Pre-1981
Car
1981-1990
Car
1991-1995
Car
1996+
Phase
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Composite
THC
g/mile
14.14
4.46
7.17
1.47
12.25
1.78
3.67
0.92
5.92
0.49
1.18
0.37
3.76
0.14
0.30
0.19
16.82
3.00
4.73
1.30
8.83
1.61
2.81
0.71
6.37
0.46
1.00
0.38
4.11
0.08
0.12
0.19
CO
g/mile
216.01
51.12
57..96
17.82
156.37
23.64
20.91
10.39
79.06
7.48
10.54
4.78
35.75
2.89
3.48
2.04
251.28
48.03
57.55
16.90
113.86
21.60
26.61
8.68
89.09
9.37
10.32
5.41
39.35
2.24
2.00
2.06
CO2
g/mile
800.09
530.98
618.29
123.74
699.87
456.72
566.51
108.71
776.50
465.33
587.15
114.33
834.76
468.84
609.72
118.81
767.71
492.37
609.40
117.49
652.62
386.61
493.37
95.86
701.82
399.91
525.36
101.08
700.27
379.66
494.48
97.47
NOx
g/mile
2.80
2.94
2.93
0.59
3.37
2.4
2.93
0.55
3.56
1.6
2.03
0.43
2.30
0.64
0.75
0.21
2.39
2.89
3.12
0.57
3.49
2.26
2.79
0.54
2.77
1.03
1.41
0.31
1.79
0.38
0.45
0.14
PM
mg/mile
281.33
101.70
28.12
106.13
210.94
31.43
22.16
39.69
40.05
19.13
5.22
20.65
40.84
6.02
3.26
7.92
361.73
42.34
14.31
57.47
114.81
23.86
13.68
28.17
55.06
16.25
6.70
18.51
46.88
6.2
4.21
8.23
OS-23
-------
Summer vs. Winter Comparison of Regulated Pollutants
Forty-two vehicles were tested in both Rounds 1 and 2 of the study, for the purpose of
comparing summer and winter vehicle emissions. Four of these vehicles were tested twice, for a
total of forty-six retest pairs across Rounds 1 and 2. Figures OS-9 and OS-10 below present
logarithmic plots comparing composite gravimetric PM2.5 and NOx across the two Rounds of
testing, with a 1:1 line provided for reference. Figure OS-11 shows the PM2 5 measurements as a
function of temperature for the two Rounds. The winter data show higher emissions and a larger
variability in emissions.
Scatter Plot of Winter Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Summer Gravimetric PM 25 - Composite (Logarithmic)
1000
AAA A
W 10X1 100.0
Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5 Emissions (mg/mile)
/pmtl/KansasOty/RoundZ/ratBote^as 24JULD6 1324
1000.0
Figure OS-9. Winter vs. Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5
OS-24
-------
Scatter Plot of Winter NOx vs. Summer NOx - Composite (Logarithmic)
10.0 H
1.0
0.01 0.10 1.00
Summer NQx Emissions (g/mlle)
/pro|1/Kansa8Cly/Fkxjnd2/reteete£as 24JULD6 1324
Figure OS-10. Winter vs. Summer NOx
10.00
160
160
140
130
120
HO
100
90
80
oi TO
I •
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Average Temperature - Composite (Linear)
3
O
§ O ° 0° O C
D Q D
D D
D
10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80
Average Temperature (degrees F)
go 100
Figure OS-11. Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Average Temperature
OS-25
-------
Analysis of In-Round Duplicate Testing Results
Sixteen vehicles were given duplicate tests during Round 1 of the study, while ten
vehicles were given duplicate tests during Round 2. Table OS-14 shows a statistical analysis
using a paired t-test on the duplicate measurements conducted during both Rounds of the study.
A paired t-test is a sensitive test for evaluating repeat measurements. The table shows that
random duplicate measurements were not significantly different. The relative humidity
measurements were significantly different in Round 1 for the duplicates, but this does not appear
to influence the NOx or other measurements in any meaningful way. We have also included the
largest mean difference in the measurements in the far right column of the table. This column
shows the threshold value for the mean difference beyond which the value would be called
significant at the 95% confidence level for the number of paired measurements made. As shown,
all mean values for all the emissions and temperatures are well below this threshold. Even the
relative humidity in Round 2 was below this value and hence not significantly different.
OS-26
-------
Table OS-14. Paired t-test Results on In-Round Duplicate Tests
Round 1
Variable
PMdiff
HCdiff
COdiff
NXdiff
tempdiff
rhdiff
Round 2
Variable
PMdiff
HCdiff
COdiff
NXdiff
tempdiff
rhdiff
Units
mg/mi
g/mi
g/mi
g/mi
cleg. F
%
Units
mg/mi
g/mi
g/mi
g/mi
cleg. F
%
N
15
18
18
17
18
18
N
9
10
10
10
10
10
Mean
0.03
0.01
0.26
0.02
-0.76
8.24
Mean
-38.16
0.00
1.66
0.01
-3.22
5.40
Std
Error
0.66
0.01
0.33
0.03
0.85
2.86
Std
Error
23.12
0.04
2.01
0.03
3.03
6.05
t
Value
0.05
0.50
0.80
0.70
-0.88
2.88
t
Value
-1.65
-0.04
0.82
0.32
-1.06
0.89
Pr>W
0.96
0.62
0.43
0.49
0.39
0.01
Pr>\t\
0.14
0.97
0.43
0.76
0.31
0.40
t for 95%
conf
2.15
2.11
2.11
2.12
2.11
2.11
t for 95%
conf
2.31
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
Mean value needed
for 95 % conf in
diff
1.41
0.03
0.69
0.06
1.80
6.03
Mean value needed
for 95 % conf in
diff
53.32
0.09
4.55
0.06
6.84
13.68
OS-27
-------
Dynamometer vs. PEMS Emission Measurement Comparison
Figure OS-12 provides a comparison of tandem testing conducted during Round 1 (the
summer portion of the study). All test results shown in Figure OS-12 are cold-start LA92 tests
conducted on EPA's portable Clayton dynamometer. Results show dynamometer CC>2 and NOX
measurements made using both the dynamometer real-time (modal) bench in comparison with
PEMS measurements. PEMS mass emission rates are derived from exhaust mass flow
measurements made using an exhaust flowmeter assembly provided by EPA (as part of the
PEMS package). Figure OS-13 shows the same information for Round 2 (the winter portion of
the study). Comparison of phase-specific and total composite emission rates in the data shows a
relatively good correlation between the PEMS and dynamometer methods of measurement.
OS-28
-------
Scatter Plot of Compoate NQx fg/nOe]
1 4
I
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0:
234567
SBKTECH NQx (g/Me)
/f»o]1/KanBaaC^//^alyaWFlound1/SumBKI_SEMja8 25JUL06 1519
Scatter Plot of Compoate CQ2 Ig/nOs]
0 100200300400500600700800900 1000 HOO 1200 1300 1400 1500
SEMIBCH CQ2 (g/Me)
/pio]1/KanBaaC^//^alyBlB/Round1/SumBKI_SEMjaB 25JUL06 1519
Figure OS-12. Results from Dynamometer vs. PEMS Emission Measurements
Conducted During Round 1 (Summer Study)
OS-29
-------
Scatter Plot of Composte NQx Ig/mte)
I 4
1600
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0:
234667
SEMTECH NOx (g/rnfe)
/picip/KanBaiClly/ArdyiWRouidl/SunBKI.SEMjas 25JUL06 1519
Scatter Plot of Composte CQ2 (g/rrtte)
0 100200300400600600700800900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
SEMTECH CQ2 (gAnfe)
A^/KanBaiClly/AralyiWRoiiid1/SunBKI_SEMjas 25JUL06 1519
Figure OS-13. Results from Dynamometer vs. PEMS Emission Measurements
Conducted During Round 2 (Winter Study)
OS-30
-------
Comparisons between fuel economy measured by the PEMS units during conditioning
runs and PEMS unit measurements during the LA92 drive cycle are shown in Figures OS-14
(Round 1) and OS-15 (Round 2). These figures tend to reveal lower fuel economy
determinations as measured by the PEMS in comparison with dynamometer measurements. This
difference could be attributed to testing discrepancies such as how closely the laboratory LA92
drive cycle approximates the driving pattern and loads encountered with real-word driving. The
difference could also be in part due to measurement discrepancies between the two systems, such
as errors or bias in determining the true exhaust mass flow rate or errors or bias in the exhaust
gas concentration measurements. Examination of results of tests comparing similar
measurement systems but different driving patterns (such as shown in Figure OS-14 and OS-15)
helps illustrate the influence of test conditions and testing variations (such as different vehicle
speeds and loads), and comparison of results of tests using identical driving patterns but different
measurement systems (such as shown in Figures OS-12 and OS-13) helps illustrate the
measurement differences of two different systems (PEMS vs. dynamometer analytical bench).
Scatter Plot of Average Fuel Economy (mles/gallon)
50
10
• •
20 30 40
SEMTECH CondlBoring Teal Fuel Economy (mpg)
/pro)1/KansaBCI»//^aly«h/Ftound1/SimFred_[V'o«" 2SJULD6 1MB
50
Figure OS-14. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer
Testing Fuel Economy for Round 1
OS-31
-------
Scatter Plot of Average Fuel Economy (miles/gallon) Round2=SbS Calculation
60
50
40
30
20 •
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
SEMTECH Conditioning Test Fuel Economy (mpg)
/proJ1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2/SumPred_Dyno_Diive.8a8 25JUL06 10:57
Figure OS-15. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer
Testing Fuel Economy for Round 2
Continuous PM Emission Measurement Results
Emission rates for each phase of the unified cycle, for each stratum of vehicle model year
ranges, measured continuously for BC and total particle mass (PM), are given in Tables OS-15
through OS-17. PM obtained from the DustTrak nephelometer are indicated by "DT" and those
from the DataRAM4 are indicated as "DR". Note that BC emission rates generally decrease
from older to newer vehicles, though because the class of older trucks (pre-1980) was only
represented by 2 vehicles, the averages are highly uncertain. Note that BC and DT PM emission
rates were highest (for cars) during Phase 1, though Phases 2 and 3 values were similar. Also
note that emission rates computed from the DataRAM4 (DR) are usually in great excess of those
obtained with the DustTrak, except for those cases of low emission rates. The DataRAM4 might
have a problem with high concentrations where the optics measurement get dirty, and adds to a
scattered signal that gets interpreted erroneously as PM.
OS-32
-------
Table OS-15. Emission rates in mg/mile for Phase 1 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks.
Phase 1
Model Year
Round 1
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
Round 2
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
TableOS-16.
Phase 2
Model Year
Round 1
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
Round 2
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
BC
63.9
18.1
4.4
3.6
168.4
35.6
20.4
12.8
Emission
BC
25.5
4.9
0.7
0.3
20.0
3.1
1.2
0.4
Car
DustTrak
249.2
112.7
26.1
27.2
630.9
207.2
103.8
89.1
DataRam
396.7
781.8
73.4
167.5
2285.7
1026.5
259.5
137.3
rates in mg/mile for Phase
and trucks.
Car
DustTrak
138.4
33.2
11.8
3.8
50.8
31.3
20.8
2.5
DataRam
677.8
213.7
70.6
32.0
82.4
186.0
111.3
2.9
BC
72.5
19.7
3.4
4.1
57.3
68.1
15.6
12.6
2 of the
BC
0.9
4.8
0.5
0.5
3.2
10.4
0.6
0.3
Truck
DustTrak
171.5
324.8
33.1
14.9
422.0
364.3
67.5
54.9
DataRam
194.2
4557.9
171.1
14.0
2401.7
1771.7
165.4
58.7
unified cycle for cars
Truck
DustTrak
9.2
214.2
10.9
3.2
41.8
39.4
15.2
1.5
DataRam
69.6
3800.6
78.4
2.8
129.8
91.3
32.8
2.0
OS-33
-------
Table OS-17. Emission rates in mg/mile for Phase 3 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks.
Phase 3
Model Year
Round 1
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
Round 2
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
BC
37.5
3.8
0.8
0.3
28.7
1.7
0.7
0.1
Car
DustTrak
92.1
22.2
7.2
2.3
52.4
15.2
4.2
0.5
DataRam
105.6
142.7
13.3
3.8
93.6
131.8
7.6
0.5
BC
1.9
7.3
0.8
0.4
3.0
3.0
0.5
0.2
Truck
DustTrak
4.8
192.0
18.9
1.8
22.9
19.1
2.7
0.8
DataRam
4.7
2086.8
78.7
2.1
21.2
92.9
4.7
0.9
Comparison of QCM Versus Time-lnegrated Gravimetric Mass Measurements
Table OS-18 and OS-19 provide a summary of emission rates for each Phase of the
Unified Test Cycle for both the QCM and the Gravimetric Filter results for Round 1 and Round
2, respectively. The table also lists the composite emission rate from the same calculation as that
used for the FTP Cycle. It should be noted that, with the exception of Pre-1981 Cars, the QCM
reports a higher emission rate than the gravimetric filter. Also the emission rate for the Pre-1981
Trucks are also shown to be less than the Pre-1981 Cars.
OS-34
-------
Table OS-18. Average Emission Rates in mg/mile Derived from QCM and
Gravimetric Filter Measurements for all Test Phases.
Vehicle
Year
TRUCKS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
CARS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
QCM Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1
62.03
44.23
18.92
13.20
202.96
32.95
16.28
14.98
Phase 2
50.65
16.74
8.09
4.53
15.16
23.87
6.94
3.29
Phase 3
22.58
17.20
11.89
3.44
33.18
18.18
7.02
2.96
Grav Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1
87.80
93.80
14.48
9.58
160.77
35.02
11.43
7.40
Phase 2
45.05
37.65
11.13
4.01
73.09
18.94
7.54
2.48
Phase 3
9.14
51.05
14.41
2.33
63.73
8.79
5.08
1.80
Table OS-19. Average Emission Rates for Round 2 in mg/mile Derived from QCM
and Gravimetric Filter Measurements for all Test Phases.
Vehicle
Year
TRUCKS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
CARS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
QCM Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1
139.04
104.91
38.25
33.33
74.95
71.68
42.20
29.67
Phase 2
39.79
20.83
16.28
8.38
9.71
16.01
16.00
9.31
Phase 3
22.27
21.37
10.95
7.51
9.52
14.07
7.67
3.92
Grav Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1
281.33
210.94
40.05
40.84
361.73
114.81
55.06
46.88
Phase 2
101.70
31.43
19.13
6.02
42.34
23.86
16.25
6.20
Phase 3
28.12
22.16
5.22
3.26
14.31
13.68
6.70
4.21
OS-35
-------
Figures OS-16 and OS-17 display the average continuous Round 1 CVS concentrations
measured using the QCM for four categories (BINS) each of Cars tested for Phases 1 and 3 of
the test cycle. Figures OS-18 and OS-19 present the same information for Round 2 vehicles.
Comparisons of Phases 1 and 3 within each round of the study reveal continuous PM mass
emission rate variations between cold start (Phase 1) and hot start (Phase 3) testing during an
equivalent drive trace for the same vehicle. Comparison of equivalent Phases between both
Rounds of the study may reveal seasonal continuous PM mass emission rate variation (Round 1
testing took place in the summer, while Round 2 testing occurred during the winter).
A nominal dynamometer speed trace is included in each figure for reference. Only
vehicle tests for which no void or partial void was noted during reduction of the data were
included in the averages. Consequently, these results should be considered as censured. It will
be noted in these figures that the QCM consistently reports negative concentrations during parts
of the various test cycle components. This should not be considered a flaw in the instrument but
rather an indication that volatile components of particulate collected during accelerations and
high-speed portions of the test cycle are desorbing from the collected parti culate. This is a
phenomena that is common to collected vehicle emissions particulate but not accounted for in
integral filter measurements.
OS-36
-------
3300
-200
•Pre1981 Cars
•1981-1990 Cars
Time, sec.
1991-1995 Cars
•1996-1005 Cars
•Speed (MPH)
100
Figure OS-16 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 1 Cars.
OS-37
-------
750
-150
Q.
W
100
Time, sec.
-Pre 1981 Cars —1981-1990 Cars —1991-1995 Cars —1996-2005 Cars —Speed (MPH)
Figure OS-17 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 3 Cars.
OS-38
-------
1170
-230
•Pre 1981 Cars
•1981-1990 Cars
Time, sec.
•1991-1995 Cars
•1996-2005 Cars
•Speed (MPH)
Figure OS-18 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 1 Cars.
OS-39
-------
500
-200
70
80
90
100
Time, sec.
-Pre 1981 Cars ^1981-1990 Cars ^1991-1995 Cars ^1996-2005 Cars —Speed (MPH)
Figure OS-19 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 3 Cars.
OS-40
-------
Particulate-Phase Emissions Speciation from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles
Full chemical speciation was determined for 26 individual/composite samples and 6
composite dilution tunnel blank samples in each test round. The summaries of the PM data for
composite exhaust and dilution blank samples in Tables OS-18 and OS-19 for Rounds 1 and 2,
respectively, show that emissions levels are well above the ranges of values for dilution tunnel
blanks with the exception of hopanes and steranes emissions for the newer model-year strata.
Summary data include gravimetric mass, OC, and EC (in mg/mile) and PAH, hopanes, and
steranes (in ug/mile). The three PAHs that are potential markers for gasoline exhaust are
indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene and coronene.
Comparisons of co-pollutants can provide validation checks for assessing the overall
accuracy and validity of the measurements. Species emitted from the same source type should
correlate and exhibit average ratios of species that reflect the nature of the source. Figure OS-20
shows gravimetric mass versus total carbon by EVIPROVE-TOR in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust for
Round 1 dynamometer test filters by test Phase. PM mass and TC are strongly correlated for the
phase 1 samples and poorly correlated for the lightly loaded phase 3 samples. Similar results are
shown in Figure OS-21 for the correlation of EC by TOR versus average BC by the
photoacoustic instrument. As we have seen in prior studies (e.g., Gasoline/Diesel PM Split
Study) for highly loaded samples, PM mass is typically well correlated with TC and EC obtained
by EVIPROVE-TOR or STN-TOT agree with photoacoustic BC. That is not the case at lower
sample loading where sampling artifacts associated with adsorbed organic compounds on the
quartz filter may be relatively more important. The correlations of the sum of elements by XRF
analysis (Figure OS-22) show the similar correlations to PM mass as TC, which again reflects
the lower mass loadings for the phase 3 samples. Figure OS-23 shows that sulfur by XRF
analysis is strongly correlated to sulfate by ion chromatography. Figure OS-24 shows that
benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno[123-cd]pyrene and coronene all correlate well with TC emissions
and Figure OS-25 shows that the sum of hopanes and steranes also correlated well with TC.
The abundances of various chemical species in the dilution blank and composite exhaust
samples during each round of testing are presented in Section 4. OC and EC are the most
abundant species in motor vehicle exhaust, accounting for over 95% of the total PM mass. For
spark ignition (SI) vehicles, BC and PM emission rates can be several times larger during the
cold start phase than during hot stabilized operation. Relatively clean SI vehicles produce BC
emissions during the more aggressive portions of the driving cycle and during cold starts.
Therefore, the emission profiles for clean SI vehicles from dynamometer tests may contain
higher fractions of EC than would be produced in congested urban driving conditions. PM
emissions from SI high-emitter contain predominantly OC. Variability of emissions from a
vehicle may be as great as the difference between vehicles, particularly for the high emitters. The
abundances of individual organic species relative to total mass or carbon are generally consistent
from profile to profile for organic and elemental carbon, PAH, hopanes & steranes, and
nitroPAH. Alkanes and polars appear too variable to be useful for receptor modeling. Gasoline
vehicles, whether low or high emitters, emit higher proportions of high molecular-weight
particulate PAHs (e.g., benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene,
and coronene). Hopanes and steranes are markers for lubricating oil from internal combustion
engines, and their emission rates were higher for high emitting vehicles.
OS-41
-------
Table OS-18. Summary of PM data for Round 1 composite exhaust samples1.
Composites
PM
Mass
OC
EC
EC/TC
PAH gas
markers
Sum of
Hopanes
Sum of
Steranes
Dilution Tunnel Blanks
SO-1
SO-2
SO-3
SO-4
SO-5
SO-6
Trucks
Sl-1
Sl-2
S2-1
S2-2
S2-3
S2-4
S3-1
S3-2
S4-1
S4-2
Cars
S5-1
S5-2
S5-3
S5-4
S5-5
S6-1
S6-2
S6-3
S6-4
S7-1
S7-2
S7-3
S7-4
S8-1
S8-2
S8-3
0.39
0.53
0.19
0.24
0.95
0.70
9.13
81.73
73.07
20.11
22.02
76.16
3.76
22.36
3.31
2.12
18.14
60.91
9.46
207.43
99.63
41.62
49.04
10.10
22.84
7.66
8.81
4.12
4.78
1.81
2.08
3.48
0.256
0.129
0.268
0.293
0.940
0.588
2.204
26.070
59.132
11.332
16.212
28.193
1.097
8.186
1.438
1.801
9.029
46.521
7.177
101.649
33.934
35.609
9.079
3.738
13.998
3.856
5.258
1.666
1.155
0.983
1.488
2.346
0.154
0.020
0.031
0.030
0.235
0.142
1.516
17.884
4.510
6.588
4.030
25.780
0.933
5.641
0.582
1.178
9.929
9.412
2.549
77.566
50.871
0.639
36.603
4.739
2.682
2.316
1.808
0.994
1.537
0.544
0.906
1.339
0.38
0.13
0.10
0.09
0.20
0.19
0.41
0.41
0.07
0.37
0.20
0.48
0.46
0.41
0.29
0.40
0.52
0.17
0.26
0.43
0.60
0.02
0.80
0.56
0.16
0.38
0.26
0.37
0.57
0.36
0.38
0.36
0.00
0.16
0.04
0.00
0.19
0.18
12.07
373.42
13.09
113.03
30.93
254.90
1.43
39.02
1.15
2.28
128.83
263.07
4.62
1031.44
480.44
4.01
345.07
19.03
24.25
8.04
13.08
11.97
7.54
0.34
2 22
2.27
0.73
0.73
1.17
0.73
2.16
2.42
1.56
31.36
164.02
8.32
59.78
36.02
0.91
22.74
1.30
2.82
120.60
292.58
29.35
405.41
175.76
52.49
16.52
5.24
26.04
10.84
25.45
11.46
7.80
1.01
3.52
3.45
0.45
0.48
0.48
0.35
1.09
1.90
0.03
5.79
44.50
3.52
48.31
14.42
0.76
6.07
0.48
1.73
0.00
63.74
5.18
63.62
46.40
12.35
6.04
0.67
8.70
7.25
8.62
0.45
0.36
0.57
1.19
1.29
Gravimetric mass, OC, and EC are in mg/mile and PAH, hopanes, and steranes are in ug/mile. The
three PAHs that are potential markers for gasoline exhaust are indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene
and coronene.
OS-42
-------
Table OS-19. Summary of PM data for Round 2 composite exhaust samples1.
Composites
PM2.5
Mass
Organic Elemental
Carbon Carbon
EC/TC
ratio
PAH gas
markers
Sum of Sum of
Hopanes Steranes
Dilution Tunnel Blanks
WO-1
WO-2
WO-3
WO-4
WO-5
WO-6
Trucks
Wl-1
Wl-2
Wl-3
W2-1
W2-2
W3-1
W3-2
W3-3
W4-1
W2-3
W4-2
W4-3
Cars
W5-1
W5-2
W5-3
W6-1
W6-2
W6-3
W6-4
W7-1
W7-2
W7-3
W7-4
W8-1
W8-2
W8-3
0.85
0.27
0.50
0.39
0.90
0.45
113.12
43.21
59.60
52.30
15.30
5.98
29.38
23.57
15.21
6.89
6.02
11.65
16.82
47.47
45.26
56.31
17.14
9.97
73.13
5.08
12.44
3.45
4.65
4.21
8.46
27.78
0.68
0.66
0.65
0.71
0.90
0.70
74.96
31.26
34.09
25.69
4.79
2.50
10.21
7.94
5.11
2.09
2.56
5.30
8.54
16.45
15.57
32.13
7.33
5.00
49.20
2.70
6.68
2.69
2.58
2.60
2.95
2.52
0.14
0.03
0.16
0.08
0.17
0.10
14.09
10.01
11.59
22.84
3.58
2.66
16.25
9.00
4.23
3.35
3.07
5.24
7.39
28.13
15.66
20.39
9.59
3.22
4.27
2.82
3.84
1.29
1.49
1.50
4.53
3.34
0.17
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.16
0.13
0.16
0.24
0.25
0.47
0.43
0.52
0.61
0.53
0.45
0.62
0.55
0.50
0.46
0.63
0.50
0.39
0.57
0.39
0.08
0.51
0.36
0.32
0.37
0.37
0.61
0.57
0.31
0.00
0.09
0.13
0.07
0.09
364.44
87.72
251.27
319.34
7.14
128.18
71.84
21.35
16.23
9.79
19.08
26.19
14.78
170.79
252.19
206.65
24.79
18.07
51.57
10.43
34.37
8.52
11.31
9.40
14.39
18.11
0.97
0.29
0.44
0.49
0.65
0.48
290.43
93.86
66.64
173.27
15.00
23.96
12.80
12.01
3.01
1.98
1.90
7.96
6.85
12.92
18.94
170.82
5.72
7.69
216.55
1.17
6.43
3.05
0.75
2.06
2.13
2.06
0.31
0.20
0.13
0.18
0.13
0.25
80.48
5.61
8.49
15.77
2.74
1.63
2.54
1.29
0.13
0.71
0.92
0.87
0.57
1.84
11.78
50.03
3.35
4.02
98.98
0.34
2.23
1.75
0.46
1.08
1.47
0.52
1 Gravimetric mass, OC, and EC are in mg/mile and PAH, hopanes, and steranes are in ug/mile. The three PAHs that
are potential markers for gasoline exhaust are indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene and coronene.
OS-43
-------
7000
y = 0.93x + 23.02
R2 = 0.98
ra
'o
y = 0.65x + 33.48
R2 = 0.84
y = 0.34x + 71.37
R2 = 0.35
• PHASE 1
• PHASE 2
A PHASE 3
Linear (PHASE 1)
• - -Linear (PHASE 2)
• — Linear (PHASE 3)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
gravimetric mass
Figure OS-20. Gravimetric mass versus total carbon by TOR
For all dynamometer test filters, separated by test phase. Concentrations are in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust.
5000
y = 1.05X-25.42
R2 = 0.97
» PHASE 1
• PHASE 2
A PHASES
Linear (PHASE 1)
— - -Linear (PHASE 2)
Linear (PHASE 3)
1000 2000 3000
EC by TOR
4000
5000
Figure OS-21. Elemental Carbon by TOR versus average BC by photoacoustic
method
For all dynamometer tests, separated by test phase. Concentrations are in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust.
OS-44
-------
7000
y = 0.95x - 9.36
R2 = 0.98
y = 0.79x + 6.28
R2 = 0.93
• PHASE 1
• PHASE 2
A PHASE 3
Linear (PHASE 1)
• - -Linear (PHASE 2)
• — Linear (PHASE 3)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
gravimetric mass
Figure OS-22. Gravimetric mass versus sum of XRF elements and total carbon by
TOR
For all dynamometer tests, separated by test phase. Concentrations are in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust.
OS-45
-------
50 100 150 200 250
S04 by 1C (ug/m3)
300
350
Figure OS-23. Sulfur by XRF *3 versus Sulfate by 1C for all exhaust composites.
The inset shows the data without the significant outlier at SO4=330 ug/m3.
Concentrations are in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust.
OS-46
-------
E
700
600
500
400
< 300
Q.
o corone
n bghipe
A in123pyr
Linear (bghipe)
Linear (corone)
Linear (in123pyr)
y = 3.18x
R2 = 0.85
50 100 150
total carbon by TOR (mg/mi)
200
Figure OS-24. Total organic carbon by TOR versus indeno[123-cd]pyrene,
benzo(ghi)pyrelene and coronene in mg/mile.
su
m
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
total organic carbon
Figure OS-25. Total organic carbon by TOR versus sum of hopanes and steranes
for exhaust composites.
Concentrations are in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust.
OS-47
-------
Gaseous-Phase Emissions Speciation from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles
VOC chemical speciation was determined for the individual/composite samples and
composite dilution tunnel blank samples. All data are field-blank corrected. The chemical
composition data for dilution tunnel blanks and exhaust samples are presented in Appendix B.
The total nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) values from the DRI VOC speciation
samples were compared to corresponding data obtained by BKI. With the exception of two
obvious outliers (SI-2 and S5-4), Figure OS-26 shows good agreement for the uncomposited
samples from Round 1. However, Figure OS-27 shows that there are two distinct groups of data
in Round 2; one with better agreement between DRI and BKI and a second group with DRI
values consistently near zero compared to widely varying values for BKI. A chronological plot
of the ratios of DRI to BKI TNMHC values for Round 2 shows that DRI consistently obtained
low values during the second half of Round 2. Sampling for VOC speciation was suspended for
two weeks in mid-February during the NREL experiments on the effects of sampling
temperature on measured PM emission rates. The appearance of consistently low DRI/BKI ratios
for TNMHC coincides with the resumption of VOC sampling on February 22, 2005. The
aldehyde data also show a similar chronological pattern with consistently lower values in the
second half of Round 2, though not as sharply lower as the hydrocarbon data. The aldehyde
sampler was connected to the same branch of the sampling train as the canister sampler. This
branch of the sampling train was disconnected from the main sampling line and capped off
during the temperature experiments. A leak somewhere in this part of the sampling train, which
allowed room air to mix with vehicle exhaust, is the most probable explanation for the near-zero
ratios after the mid point in Round 2. Accordingly, the data for VOC and carbonyl compounds
for the second half of Round 2 must be considered invalid. Figure OS-28 presents a
chronological figure of the ratio of TMNHC measured by DKI and BKI. Of the 57 canisters
collected and analyzed for VOC speciation in Round 2, 32 were affected.
The distributions in emission rates in Figures OS-29 through OS-32 for BTEX and
formaldehyde show that newer model year vehicles are generally clean and that emissions of
older vehicles are highly variable with some vehicles emitting BTEX and formaldehyde at rates
exceeding that of normal emitters by more than two orders of magnitude. The figures also
illustrate the sampling problems that occurred during the second half of Round 2. Although
unfortunate, the partial loss of VOC speciation data should be viewed in context of the two main
project objectives, which are to establish the distribution of emissions for the in-use vehicles in
Kansas City and chemical profiles for VOC and PM emissions. Even without the partial loss of
data, the speciated emissions data alone would have not been sufficient to fully characterize the
distribution of emissions of specific VOC or volatile MSAT. Rather it is the bulk hydrocarbons
and PM emissions data for the larger set of test vehicles that provide the emissions distributions
of the in-use vehicle fleet. The speciation profiles, averaged by appropriate factors such as
season, region, or high versus normal emitters, provide the means for disaggregating total
emissions to specific species.
The missing VOC speciation data were reconstructed by first calculating the ratios of
reported concentration of each hydrocarbon compound to the total HC reported for each run.
These ratios were then averaged for all valid canister samples and the resulting average and
standard deviation of the ratios were used to estimate the hydrocarbon speciation for the invalid
OS-48
-------
samples based on the total HC from BKI's bag samples. These reconstructed data are included
with the data set for completeness in a separate table. The previous plots for BTEX emissions are
shown in Figures OS-33 and OS-34 as fractions of individual species to the sum of BTEX. The
abundances of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes are similar among the samples and
between Rounds 1 and 2. Figure OS-35 shows the strong correlations among related aromatic
hydrocarbon species for all exhaust composites.
800
200
400
DRI canister
600
800
Figure OS-26. Correlation plot of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRI NMHC (ppmC)
for Round 1.
OS-49
-------
E
S
5
m
400
300 -
200 ;.
100(|
100
200
DRI tnmhc
300
400
Figure OS-27. Correlation plots of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRI NMHC
(ppmC) for Round 2.
(0
o
DRI/BKI Rati
1.75 -
1.50
1.25
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
n nn
•
»
•*.'/'
ft+6* ft* **A ft* *** A A
T- CM CM CO CO
sample date
Figure OS-28. Ratios of the TNMHC measured by DRI to BKI during Round 2
shown chronologically.
OS-50
-------
3500
3000 - -
2500 - -
2000 - -
1500 --
1000 --
500 --
CNI CO ^T LO CD
_ O CD CD O CD
ro ro ro ro ro ro
Tunnel blanks
v^- CN| CN| CN| CN| CO CO
COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO
Trucks
LOLOLOLOLOCDCDCDCDN-N-N-N-COCO--
rorororororororororororororororo
Cars
Figure OS-29. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 1.
(Data for SI-2, S5-4 and S5-5 are suspect.)
2000
1500 --
• 1000 f
E
500 --
Tunnel blanks
a H
Trucks
Cars
D o-xylene
I m/p-xylene
aEtBenzene
D Toluene
D Benzene
Figure OS-30. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 2.
(Samples collected after mid-February 2005 are invalid and are not shown in the figures.)
OS-51
-------
50
40
30
,_
0
yj
-------
m
•5
C
O
1.0 T,
0.8 -I
0.6
0.4 -
0.2 -
0.0
T^- CNI CO ^ LO CD
CD CD CD CD CD CD
ro ro ro ro ro ro
Tunnel blanks
V ^ V
T^- -r- CN CN CN CO
CO CO CO CO CO CO
Trucks
D o-xylene
I m/p-xylene
H EtBenzene
D Toluene
D Benzene
Cars
Figure OS-33. Fraction of BTEX for individual/composite samples from Round 1.
(Data for SI-2, S5-4 and S5-5 are suspect.)
m
'o
0.0
Figure OS-34. Fraction of BTEX for valid individual/composite samples from
Round 2.
OS-53
-------
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000
BENZENE
5000 10000
EthylBenzene
5000 10000 15000 20000
propene
25000
5000 10000
15000 20000
BENZENE
25000 30000 35000
Figure OS-35. Correlation plots of related VOC species for all exhaust
composites.
Concentrations shown are ppbC of diluted exhaust.
The lack of correlation and the low 1,3-butadiene/propene ratios shown in Figure OS-35
indicate that a substantial fraction of the 1,3-butadiene had been lost in most of the samples due
to reaction with NOx. As previously mentioned, the true values are estimated by multiplying the
propene values by the 1,3-butadiene/propene ratio from the DOE/NREL Gasoline/Diesel PM
Split Study.
Acrolein is known to rearrange on DNPH cartridges to an unknown degradation product
(acrolein-X) (Tejada, 1986). This rearrangement is sufficiently rapid that most of the acrolein
may convert to acrolein-X, unless the sample is analyzed within a few hours. The problem is
compounded by the fact that acrolein-X co-elutes in the HPLC analysis with butyraldehyde. A
procedure was developed in a separate project conducted by the DRI for the Health Effects
Institute (Fujita et al., 2006) and applied after the initial analyses to more accurately quantify
acrolein and butyraldehyde.
OS-54
-------
In summary, the VOC profiles are very consistent across all categories for major air
toxics (BTEX). Emission rates were highly variable, but higher for strata 1, 2, 5, and 6. Tunnel
blanks showed very low concentrations relative to exhaust samples.
OS-55
-------
1.0 Introduction
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Coordinating Research Council
(CRC), the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL), the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), and the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators/Association of
Local Air Pollution Control Officials (STAPPA/ALAPCO) sponsored a program to evaluate
exhaust emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles (LDGVs). The program measured
particulate matter (PM) and other components of exhaust emissions from approximately 480
randomly selected, LDGVs in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. Data obtained from this
program will be used to evaluate and update existing and future mobile source emission models
(MOBILE6 and MOVES).
In the Summer of 2004, EPA established a contract with Eastern Research Group, Inc.
(ERG) to conduct a program in Kansas City to evaluate exhaust emissions from light-duty
gasoline vehicles. The study was conducted in Kansas City in three parts:
Part 1: Pilot Study (June 2004)
Part 2: Round I Testing (July-September 2004)
Part 3: Round II Testing (January-April 2005)
1.1 Background
Mobile sources significantly contribute to ambient concentrations of air contaminants,
including PM. Recent source apportionment studies for PMio and PM2 5 indicate that mobile
sources can be responsible for over half of the ambient PM measured in an urban area
(Motallebi, 1999; Magliano, 1998; Dzubay et al., 1988). Some of these source apportionment
studies have attempted to differentiate between contributions from gasoline and diesel
combustion. Studies conducted in Denver and Phoenix indicated that gasoline combustion from
mobile sources contributed more to ambient PM than diesel combustion (Lawson and Smith,
1998; Ramadan, 2000). However, studies conducted in Los Angeles and the San Joaquin Valley
in California indicate that diesel combustion contributed more than gasoline combustion to
ambient PM (Schauer et al., 1996; Schauer and Cass, 2000). Existing emission inventories
developed by the EPA also suggest diesel vehicles contribute more than gasoline vehicles to
ambient PM concentrations.
Exhaust emissions of particulate matter from gasoline-powered motor vehicles have
changed significantly over the past 30 years (Cadle et al., 1999). These changes have resulted
from reformulation of fuels, the wide application of exhaust gas treatment, and changes in engine
design and operation. Because of these evolving tailpipe emissions, along with the wide
variability of emissions between vehicles of the same class (Hildemann et al., 1991; Cadle et al.,
1997; Sagebiel et al., 1997; Yanowitz et al., 2000), well-defined average emissions profiles for
the major classes of motor vehicles have not been established.
The majority of exhaust PM emitted by motor vehicles is in the PM2.5 size range.
Kleeman et al. (2000) have shown that gasoline and diesel fueled vehicles produce particles that
are mostly less than 2.0 um in diameter. Cadle et al. (1999) found that 91% of PM emitted by
1-1
-------
in-use gasoline vehicles in the Denver area was in the PM2.5 size range, which increased to 97%
for "smokers" (i.e., light-duty vehicles with visible smoke emitted from their tailpipes). Durbin
et al. (1999) found that 92% of the PM was smaller than 2.5 um for smokers. The mass median
diameter of the PM emitted by the gasoline vehicles sampled by Cadle et al. (1999) was about
0.12 um, which increased to 0.18 urn for smokers. Corresponding average emissions rates of
PM2.5 were 38 mg/mi for normal emitting gasoline vehicles and 222 mg/mi for gasoline smokers.
The research by Cadleet al. (1999) and Norbeck et al. (1998) estimated the incidence of
vehicles with visible smoke plumes using roadside surveys. Cadle used both remote sensing and
visual surveys in Denver, Colorado and Norbeck used the visual method in Southern California.
Their results were somewhat different, but the fleet average incidence was found to be about 1%.
Emissions from smokers are comparable to those from diesel vehicles. Thus, older and
poorly maintained gasoline vehicles could be significant sources of PM2.5 (Sagebiel et al., 1997;
Lawson and Smith, 1998). Durbin et al. (1999) point out that although smokers constitute only
1.1 to 1.7% of the light-duty fleet in the South Coast Air Quality Management District in
California, they contribute roughly 20% of the total PM emissions from the light-duty fleet.
Motor vehicles that are high emitters of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide can be high emitters
of PM (Sagebiel et al., 1997; Cadle et al., 1997). National distributions of smokers and high
emitting vehicles for PM have not been evaluated.
ERG has estimated the incidence of smoking vehicles in the Phoenix fleet by analyzing
data from the Maricopa County Smoking Vehicle Hotline. Data from the Maricopa County
Smoking Vehicle Hotline indicates that the incidence of smoking vehicles that are new is up to
100-times lower than the fleet average, and the incidence of older smoking vehicles is up to 4-
times higher than the average, indicating a strong age dependence for smokers.
Many studies have tried to characterize the distribution of PM for a vehicle fleet. One
example of a PM emission distribution is shown in Figure 1-1. We see that there is an age
dependence in the data but also that there is a large variance among vehicles. As an example,
10-year-old vehicles can have PM emissions from 1-2 mg/mi to 1,000 mg/mi.
1-2
-------
10000
t
S.
0.01
*__•__• . « . !
New Vehicle Standard = 200 mg/mi»
n ? , |
t Ml
* • *
* 1 • 1
* »
•
•
i
t
•
«
i
!
1
*
»
1
$
t
!
i
•
•
*
^
-• —
A
i
*
i !
^ 4
t
! ' I
j
i
i
i i
K ^ 4
>
:
>
i
•
i
i
i •
> •
>
«
•
A
•
1
i
!
»
•
-*
«
i
t
*
ii * i J
...•...^...^ ,
1 ! • * t
! : ! 5 .
. 1 * *
g . *
i 5 * I '
• » •
012345
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Age (years)
Figure 1-1. Example Plot of PM Data from Light-Duty Gasoline Cars and Trucks,
Model Year 1994 and Older
Source: Burnette, A.D.; Kishan, S., "PART5-TX1: Update of the PARTS Model For Use In Texas." Final report by
ERG for the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (now named Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality). Austin, Texas, July 14, 2000. Note: The data are from in-use vehicles recruited from private owners. The
database was compiled from various research sources.
A major obstacle in previous emissions testing studies has been the recruitment of
vehicles. Most studies have not incorporated random sampling in the study design due to the
high non-participation rate and the high incentive costs associated with random sampling of
vehicles. Therefore, few studies, and no studies evaluating light-duty PM emissions, can be used
to represent the distribution of vehicle emissions in a large population.
1.2 Study outline
One of EPA's key missions has been to understand, evaluate, and reduce exhaust
emissions from motor vehicles. Since the late 1960's, EPA has been focused on this mission and
has implemented many regulations to achieve this goal. One primary mechanism to reduce
emissions has been the promulgation of new emissions standards for pollutants from motor
vehicles that require vehicle manufacturers to reduce emissions from new vehicles. However,
even if a new vehicle has low emission levels, as that vehicle ages, its emissions will increase as
its engine wears and its emissions control components deteriorate.
In an effort to understand the emissions of a fleet comprised of both new and older
vehicles, EPA has conducted studies to measure emissions from a random sample of vehicles
and then projected it to the population as a whole. Gaseous emissions have been studied
extensively through the last few decades, both through special studies and through analysis of
vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program data. However, particulate matter (PM)
1-3
-------
emissions from gasoline-powered motor vehicles are less understood. Through this study EPA
has conducted a "watershed" research experiment to characterize PM emissions from a very
carefully selected random sample of vehicles in a major metropolitan area.
The metropolitan area chosen by EPA was Kansas City, MO/KS. The primary reason for
this choice was that KC is the largest US metro area without an I/M program. In an I/M
program area vehicles are regularly required to be tested and repaired to meet local emissions
standards. Since I/M programs affect a vehicle's deterioration rate (by requiring repairs and
maintenance that otherwise might not be performed), conducting a study on vehicles not
subjected to an I/M program allows evaluation of vehicles under "natural" deterioration rates.
The Kansas City fleet sample tested in this study was not influenced by any I/M program. In
addition, PM emissions can be influenced by ambient temperature and this study was conducted
throughout a wide range of summer and winter temperatures.
EPA envisioned this study to be a landmark study in which special attention was given to
selecting a participating sample chosen from the general population in a scientific manner. In
addition, all vehicle testing procedures were specified in a QA document approved by EPA.
Calibration tests, replicate tests, laboratory correlation, non-response analysis, seasonal effects,
and emissions test variability were all considered and included in the program design. EPA
monitored the field testing closely, and ERG established a secure web site and an FTP site to
report project status on a daily basis to EPA.
Another key feature of this study was intended to identify how real-world on board
measurement devices (PEMS) could be used to collect mass-based vehicle emissions exhaust
data. These devices were put on all vehicles tested in this project. Additionally, a PEMS device
was connected to every vehicle while it was simultaneously measured with laboratory grade
instruments on a dynamometer. This information may be used to assess the use of PEMS devices
as a primary method for collecting on-road vehicle emissions data.
Data was closely managed on-site and then posted for further integrity and QA checks
and analysis at other ERG offices. The data was delivered to EPA in raw and QA'd form.
Quality-assured data was also put into the EPA MSOD format and delivered to EPA.
The ERG team used a prior transportation study conducted by Mid-America Regional
Council as a starting point for recruiting vehicles for this project. The MARC 2004 Household
study (Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, 2003) participants were
used as a cohort for recruiting vehicles. ERG's subcontractor NuStats conducted this study for
MARC.
The KC study was conducted in three distinct Phases. In the Pilot phase the KC facility
was set up and all equipment, staff, and logistics were mobilized. The team also tested 3 EPA-
provided "correlation" vehicles to compare EPA Ann Arbor dynamometer laboratory
measurements with those obtained using the EPA portable Clayton dynamometer at the KC test
facility. The Pilot Study is included in Appendix BB. The main study was started in June 2004
and was called Round 1 testing. During this round, approximately 250 vehicles were tested
under summer conditions at the facility. In the final testing round, Round 2, approximately 250
additional vehicles were tested under winter conditions. Approximately 40 vehicles tested
1-4
-------
during Round 1 were re-tested in Round 2 to compare exhaust emissions changes due to seasonal
changes.
During the course of testing, about 4 to 6 cars were usually tested each day. A typical
scenario for testing of a vehicle was as follows. Mailouts describing the test program were
initially sent to prospective vehicle owners. These vehicle owners were then recruited by ERG
team personnel in call centers for participation in the study, and an incentive was established as a
participation reward for each participant. An appointment for delivery of the vehicle to the
testing site was established. A day before the scheduled appointment, the vehicle owner was
contacted as a reminder. Once the vehicle arrived at the testing site, ERG's personnel evaluated
the vehicle's condition and took several photographs to establish its general status. The test
program and condition of the vehicle were discussed with the vehicle's owner, and several kinds
of information were collected about the driver and the vehicle. Fuel and lubricating oil samples
were extracted from each vehicle and stored for future analysis. Once the vehicle was accepted
for testing, a portable emissions measurement system (PEMS) was installed on the vehicle and a
conditioning test was conducted. This required that the vehicle be driven on a predetermined
route for about 30 minutes to prepare it for dynamometer testing in a manner consistent with all
other test vehicles. After the conditioning test, the PEMS was removed from the vehicle, and the
vehicle was stored at the test site for testing the next day. On the following test day, the vehicle
was pushed on to the dynamometer and the vehicle emissions testing components were attached
to the vehicle. These included both the connection from the vehicle tailpipe to the dilution
tunnel of the lab-grade testing equipment, and installation of PEMS device on the vehicle for
simultaneous measurement. The vehicle was then driven through the three Phases of the LA-92
driving cycle, and its exhaust emissions were measured and recorded on a second by second
basis. The following vehicle measurements were conducted during the testing:
Measurements via the dilution tunnel:
• THC via FID
• CO & CO2 via NDIR
• NOx via Chemiluminescence
• Gravimetric mass and elemental analysis through Teflon membrane collection
• EC/OC and Ion analysis though Quartz membrane collection
• PM and SVOC via TIGF/XAD
• Canister Sampling for 1-3 butadiene with NOx Denuder
• Carbonyls through DNPH Cartridges
• Continuous PM measurements via a Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and
verified using DustTrak and DataRAM nephelometers
Measurements via PEMS devices:
• THC via FID
• CO via NDIR
• CO2 via NDIR
• O2 via Electrochemical Sensor
• NO via NDUV
1-5
-------
• Vehicle parameters via OBDII connector (if available)
• Temperature and relative humidity via portable weather probe
• Location, velocity, altitude via GPS
In addition, all ambient and dilution tunnel conditions including temperature, humidity,
and ambient THC levels were independently measured and recorded on a continuous basis. At
the end of the dynamometer testing, equipment was removed from each vehicle, the vehicle was
taken off the dynamometer and checked for any damage, and was then stored for customer
pickup. Participants were given their incentives during vehicle pickup. Some vehicles were
selected for additional instrumentation with PEMS devices before their release, and the
participants were requested to drive the vehicle in their usual way. No route or duration was
specified (although the drivers were encouraged to perform as much of their regular driving as
possible with the PEMS device installed). Drivers then returned to the testing facility the next
day for the removal of the PEMS equipment.
Another component of the testing program included the RSD testing of the general KC
fleet during Round 1 and Round 2. Over the 3-4 months of in-field testing, RSD vans were
conducting tests for about one week each month. This information was used to compare the KC
fleet with the sample tested at the KC testing facility.
After the testing was completed, emissions data from each aspect of the testing program
was put through several iterations of QA/QC. The ERG team then converted all the data into
EPA's MSOD format and delivered all the information to EPA. All raw files and final MSOD
data set have undergone a thorough EPA review.
Summary of Goals
Data obtained from this program will be used to evaluate and update existing and future
mobile source emission models. This project will also provide a benchmark to establish various
vehicle recruitment, testing, data collection, and vehicle exhaust emissions analysis protocols
which EPA may use in future data collection efforts. The study itself was conducted in three
parts: a Pilot Study, Round 1, and Round 2.
Initially, the Pilot Study was used to set up the testing facility in Kansas City, finalize all
testing and data handling procedures, and test 3 vehicles at the EPA Ann Arbor facility and the
Kansas City facility to establish the baseline relationship between the two facilities. Testing was
conducted in two Rounds in the Summer of 2004 (Round 1), and the Winter of 2004/2005
(Round 2). Vehicles were recruited and then tested with Portable Emissions Measurement
Systems (PEMS) and on conventional dynamometers with laboratory grade emissions
measurement systems. The following sections provide an overview of the numbers of vehicles
tested in both Rounds.
The KC testing program was designed by EPA to collect vehicle exhaust measurements
from a randomly selected set of vehicles so that the following primary goals could be met:
• Characterize PM emissions distribution in the Kansas City fleet;
• Identify the high emitter percentage in that fleet;
1-6
-------
• Collect exhaust emissions (both gaseous and PM toxics) for vehicles in the fleet.
In addition, there were a number of secondary goals for the study, including:
• Demonstrate the use of a cohort, and a sampling plan to select candidate vehicles;
• Test vehicles in an ambient environment close to their operating area, and gather
data in summer and winter conditions;
• Refine the use of PEMS configurations for large scale implementation;
• Compare results of laboratory grade measurement devices with PEMS;
• Develop useful continuous PM measurement techniques compared to traditional
gravimetric measurement;
• Develop inventory of speciated HC constituents of vehicle exhaust in PM and
gaseous modes;
• Gather emissions and activity data on vehicles driven by their owners in real
world conditions; and
• Gather information to relate second by second vehicle driving and resulting PM
emissions for developing input data for emissions models;
Pilot Testing
The first field testing phase was Pilot Testing. Details of the Pilot Testing are available
in a separate report (provided in Appendix BB). The primary goals of this phase were:
• Set up a testing facility in Kansas City that will be used for the entire study;
• Finalize all testing methodologies, testing procedures, and data handling
procedures; and
• Test three vehicles in Ann Arbor and Kansas City to establish the relationship
between the emission results from the two facilities.
Setting up the testing facility was an intense task. A warehouse was selected in KC to
serve as the testing facility. EPA's portable dynamometer was transported to this facility and
was set up for emissions testing. All testing equipment for gaseous and PM emissions
measurement were arranged and detailed handling procedures for handling vehicles, equipment,
and data were established. In addition, three EPA provided vehicles were tested in Ann Arbor
and at this facility to compare results between the two laboratories.
1.2.2 Round 1 Testing
The main study in Kansas City started in July of 2004. This period was designated as
Round 1. Vehicles were tested in typical Midwest summer conditions. Although the total
number of vehicles dynamometer tested exceeded project goals, several strata targets were not
achieved (most notably in bins 1 and 5). The MARC vehicle database was solely used for
vehicle recruitment (via random digit dialing, or RDD) for Round 1 recruiting.
1-7
-------
Table 1-1 lists the various tests conducted during Round 1, in comparison with project
goals. PEMS testing on conditioning runs was performed on all vehicles, regardless of
dynamometer eligibility.
Table 1-1. Round 1 Tests Conducted
Test Type
PEMS Conditioning Test
Replicate PEMS Conditioning Test
PEMS Driveaway Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test Replicate
Dynamometer/PEMS Control Vehicle Test
Round 1 Goal
All
1 per week
N/A
250
1 per week
1 per week
Round 1 Tested
284
17
13
261
15
12
1.2.3 Round 2 Testing
The goals of the Round 2 testing were similar to those of Round 1 testing. One important
additional goal of Round 2 testing was to test the vehicles in colder weather where PM formation
mechanisms may be different than those in warmer weather. In order to better achieve strata-
specific test targets during Round 2 testing, the MARC database used for Round 1 recruiting was
supplemented with the KC registration database for Round 2 recruiting of Bins, 1, 2, 5, and 6.
This significantly improved recruiting efforts. This additional database for recruiting older
vehicles provided an additional pool of the older, less populated vehicle group. Due to the
sampling methodology developed, more older vehicles were recruited as a fraction of their
population due to the higher likelihood of high emitters as well as high emissions variability
within this group.
Table 1-2 lists the various tests conducted during Round 2, in comparison with project
goals. Regardless of dynamometer test eligibility, PEMS tests (during the conditioning run)
were performed on all vehicles (excluding vehicles whose interior would not accommodate a
PEMS device).
Table 1-2. Round 2 Tests Conducted
Test Type
PEMS Conditioning Test (excluding replicates)
Replicate PEMS Conditioning Test
PEMS Driveaway Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test (excluding replicates)
Dynamometer/PEMS Test Replicate
Dynamometer/PEMS Control Vehicle Test
PAMS Driveaway Test
Round 2 Goal
All
1 per week
50
261
1 per week
1 per week
N/A
Round 2 Tested
324
19
51
279
12
12
8
1.2.4 Round 1 to Round 2 Retest Vehicles
Selected vehicles were originally tested during Round 1 and were then retested at the start
of Round 2 in order to provide summer/winter correlation data. Forty-two of these Round 1
1-8
-------
retest vehicles were tested (exceeding the retest target of 25 vehicles) in order to ensure all strata
were filled.
1.3 Report Presentation
This report summarizes the results of the testing conducted in Kansas City, KS in July
2004 through April 2005. Section 2 presents information on facility site selection and project
setup, including calibration of the instrumentation used during testing. Section 3 discusses
vehicle recruitment and sampling methodologies. Section 4 presents a discussion of the testing
process, as well as data summaries and test conclusions.
The report appendices contain extensive supplementary data, plots, and charts referenced
in this document. A detailed index of the contents in the appendices is provided at the end of this
document. The ERG team performed many levels of QA/QC on data obtained during the course
of the study, and the final datasets were provided to EPA in a format suitable for loading into the
Mobile Source Observation Database. As EPA uses these data for input into MOVES, further
data editing may be necessary before the data are released to the public.
1-9
-------
2.0 Site Selection and Project Setup
In March 2004, ERG conducted a pilot study to establish a testing facility in Kansas City,
finalize all testing methodologies, testing procedures, and data handling procedures, and test
three vehicles in Ann Arbor and Kansas City to establish the relationship between the emission
results from the two facilities. At the conclusion of the study in June 2004, ERG prepared and
submitted a report on its outcome.
The site chosen to conduct testing was located at 6636 Berger Avenue, Kansas City, KS.
This property had about 7,000 sq ft total floor space, with about 1,000 sq ft office and 2
restrooms. With four 14' x 14' bay doors plus two wall vent fans, this site provided adequate
ventilation and easy access. The facility lacked an overhead water sprinkler system, which meant
it could be used at sub-freezing temperatures. About 5,000 sq ft of main floor space was
available for the test area and vehicle soaking, with another 900 sq ft of area for working on and
inspecting vehicles. The site also included three offices plus a common area. The front entrance
and parking was ideal to greet vehicle owners. The site had ample outdoors parking and storage,
and the building was ready to occupy after minor clean up.
2.1 QAPP
A final Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) was prepared and submitted in August
2004, in accordance with Section 4.0 of the original EPA task order for this project. The plan,
developed in consultation with the EPA's project officer and sponsors, specifies the details
required to collect and analyze the source samples in a manner consistent with the objectives of
the study.
The QAPP covered aspects of the test program as outlined in the EPA task order,
including the following areas:
• Contractual support in maintaining, calibrating, and operating mobile source
emissions measurement equipment used in the field. The necessary support
includes analyzing the collected samples, data processing, and report writing.
• Pilot programs (including a report on all sample data analyzed)
• Vehicle recruitment
• Vehicle testing
• Speciation
• Quality assurance/quality control
• Data management and integration
• Data analysis
• Oral and written reports
• A methodology for regularly transferring and reviewing all data streams within
this project
2.2 Dynamometer Setup
Vehicle driving simulation was conducted using EPA-ORD's transportable
dynamometer, a Clayton Model CTE-50-0 chassis dynamometer mounted within a towable
2-1
-------
Fruehauf trailer. The dynamometer is a vintage 1975 model and has been in service routinely
over the last 15 years on similar field studies. The dynamometer is capable of simulating a
continuous spectrum of loads from 3 to 50 Hp @ 50 mph and inertias from 1750 to 3000 pounds
in 250 pound increments and 3000 to 5500 pounds in 500 pound increments. Cooling fluid for
the dynamometer's water brake power absorption unit consists of a 50/50 mixture of water and
glycol. The fluid is recirculated and cooled by a self-contained pumping and cooling system.
For this study, the dynamometer was set up in one quadrant of a large building. Large
(14' x 14') bay doors on either end of the building were opened and provided natural ventilation
to ambient conditions. Power for the dynamometer and associated utilities was obtained from the
building's power grid. The dynamometer, as mounted on the Fruehauf trailer, is elevated
approximately 3 feet above ground level. Ramps and an electric winching system were installed
to bring the test vehicles onto the dynamometer for cold start emissions testing.
The dynamometer and associated equipment was originally set up on site for the pilot
study, and remained in place for the duration of both Rounds 1 and 2. One modification was
made to the dynamometer before beginning Round 1, as suggested after reviewing results from
the pilot study. The change involved switching the speed signal from the front, coupled roll, to
the rear, uncoupled roll. To accomplish this, a speed encoder was installed on the rear roll, wired
to the driver's aid, and calibrated.
A Positive Displacement Pump-Constant Volume Sampler (PDP-CVS) system was used
to quantitatively dilute exhaust gas from the vehicle operating on the dynamometer. The PDP-
CVS system employed an 8-inch diameter stainless steel dilution tunnel with paniculate filtered
inlet air and a SutorBilt PDF operating at -540 SCFM. The outside of the dilution tunnel was
insulated with Insulwrap and the temperature of the diluted exhaust and dilution tunnel was
maintained at a constant temperature of 46°C using a 27.3 kW, electric dilution air heater
(Unique Products model number 507-574) whose feedback control thermocouple had been
moved to a location near the PDF inlet. The dilution air was also treated to reduce humidity
levels by placing a re-generative desiccant-type dryer (TempAir model TD400) at the dilution
tunnel inlet. The dryer was used only during Round 1, treating the humid air typical of Kansas
City in the summer time. Both the heater and the dryer were powered with a portable, diesel-
fueled 50kW generator located outside and adjacent to the facility. Diluted exhaust exiting the
CVS-PDP system was routed through 8-inch diameter ducting to an existing, wall-mounted
exhaust fan to remove diluted exhaust from the building.
The transportable dynamometer system has used modal emissions analysis for the
determination of regulated emissions in previous field studies. A bag sampling system was
constructed and installed for this study to give dual modal/bag analysis capabilities. Total
Hydrocarbons (THC) were analyzed with a Horiba Model FIA-236 Flame lonization Detector.
Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) were analyzed with a Horiba Model CLA-220 Chemiluminescence
instrument. Carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) were analyzed with Horiba Model
AIA-210 infrared instruments. A Horiba Model AIA-23 infrared instrument was used to analyze
low level CO concentrations. All instruments were rack mounted and plumbed for introduction
of zero, span, and sample gases through the use of solenoid valves and pushbutton controls.
Regulated emission analytical instrumentation remained powered on 24 hours per day. Sample
delay times (8-12 seconds) were measured during the Pilot Study in order to time align modal
2-2
-------
gaseous data with the vehicle speed trace. The sample line lengths were not the same lengths.
The THC analyzer had a dedicated heated sample line, and the CO, CO2, and NOx instruments
used a second common sample line and water trap (chiller) to remove moisture from the sample
stream. Time alignment was performed for each analyzer during post processing of the data.
2.3 Maintenance and Calibration of CVS, Dynamometer and Regulated
Emissions Instrumentation
Constant Volume Sampler (CVS)
As specified in Section 4.2.1 of the QAPP, and in accordance with 86.119-78 paragraph
(c) of 40 CFR July 1, 1983, monthly propane injections were conducted on the CVS-PDP system
to verify CVS flow. Results of the propane injections, conducted on July 25, August 30, and
September 30 of 2004, and January 10, February 24, and March 29 of 2005 are given in
Appendix E. Injections were conducted in triplicate on each date, with the dilution tunnel heated
to its normal operating temperature of 46°C ± 3°C, and results were calculated for both bag and
modal (real time) HC analysis. Propane mass injected was determined gravimetrically by
recording before and after weights of the propane cylinder on a digital balance. Propane mass
recovered was calculated using analyzed HC concentrations and a previously determined PDF
VO of 0.306 cubic feet/revolution. Agreement between propane injected and propane recovered
was within the CFR guidelines of ± 2%, except for the bag calculated values in August 2004 and
modal calculated values in January 2005. No explanation could be found (or at least verified) for
the rather large percent differences (>4%) found in these two cases. No corrective actions were
performed in either the August 2004 or the January 2005 cases and in each case, the next
scheduled injection was within the 2% CFR guidelines.
Regulated Emissions Instrumentation
Per Section 4.2.1 of the QAPP, all analyzers used in the measurement of HC, CO, NOx,
and CO2 were calibrated in accordance with requirements 86.121-82, 86.122-78, 86.123-78, and
86.124-78, respectively, all of which can be found in 40 CFR July 1, 1983. Instrumentation used
to measure regulated emissions (THC, NOx, CO, CO2) associated with chassis dynamometer
operation were checked for linearity prior to study startup and on a monthly basis during the
study itself. Linearity checks were performed 5 times during the study, twice during Round 1 and
three times during Round 2. Linearity checks were performed via multipoint calibrations.
Appendix E presents results of the multipoint calibration checks. Known, down-scale standard
concentrations (Concstd) were generated with a capillary type 10-point gas divider using zero gas
and a known concentration of the gas of interest. Instrument response to the down-scale standard
concentrations was measured and recorded as Concmeas. Linear regression was performed on the
pairs of standard and measured concentrations to determine the slope, intercept, and correlation
coefficient (R2) of the best-fit first order curve. Slope and intercepts of the regression curve were
applied to the measured concentrations to produce regression concentrations Concreg. The
difference between Concstd and Concreg are given as a percent in the last column, and in general,
are less than ± 2 %, as required for certification testing. Based on the results of the monthly
multipoint calibrations, the instruments were found to remain within linearity specifications and
no adjustments were required.
2-3
-------
Working span gases for the NOx, HC, CO, and CC>2 instrumentation were obtained from
Scott Specialty Gases as Continuous Emissions Monitor (CEM)-l daily standards with a vendor
provided analytical accuracy of ± 1 %. Zero airs and FID fuels were obtained both from a local
vendor (Kirk Gases) and from Scott Specialty Gases. Nominal NO span gas concentrations were
90 ppm. Both a high range and low range multigas was used for the CO, CO2, and HC
instruments. Nominal high range gas concentrations were 900 ppm CO, 2.5% CO2, and 900
ppmC HC, while nominal low range concentrations were 90 ppm CO, 0.9% CO2, and 90 ppmC
HC.
Dynamometer
Dead weight calibrations were performed on the dynamometer's torque cell throughout
the course of Rounds 1 and 2, as indicated in Table 2-1. Results remained consistent throughout
the study. In addition, a daily, single point dead weight check was performed starting mid-way
through Round 1 to ensure the integrity and proper adjustment of the real time torque
measurement system. The daily check was initiated in response to an intermittent short
occurring in the torque recording system early in Round 1, which was subsequently traced to a
rusted rivet connection and corrected.
Table 2-1. Dynamometer Torque Cell- Dead Weight Calibrations
Wt Applied
Ibs
50
40
15
5
0
Equivalent
Hp(a),50mph
18.5
14.8
5.55
1.85
0
Measured
Hp(a),50mph
07/25/2004
18.6
14.9
5.6
2
0.1
Measured
Hp^SOmph
10/04/2004
18.6
14.9
5.5
1.8
0
Measured
Hpf&SOmph
1/11/05
18.5
14.8
5.5
1.8
0
Measured
Hp(a),50mph
1/25/05
18.6
14.9
5.5
1.8
0
Measured
Hp^SOmph
2/26/05
18.5
14.7
5.3
1.6
0
Measured
Hpf&SOmph
4/7/05
18.6
14.9
5.5
1.8
0
Other daily performance checks included PDF speed, dynamometer speed, and
dynamometer coastdowns. Coastdowns were conducted as set out in Section 4.2.1 of the QAPP,
and as outlined in 40 CFR part 86. Results of the daily performance checks are presented in
Appendix E. Measured PDF speeds ranged from 1772 rpm to 1765 rpm (excepting one day with
a measured speed of 1748 rpm), or about 0.5%, over the course of Round 1, and from 1768 to
1780 over the course of Round 2, indicating excellent control over tunnel flows. Measured
dynamometer roll speeds were within 1% of actual measured roll speeds during both Rounds
excepting two days when there was a difference of- 1.4 %. A slight adjustment was made to the
dynamometer speed measuring system midway through Round 2 which can be seen in the
control chart given in Figure 2-1. This adjustment was made after replacing the dynamometer's
reflective tape strip, which was used to make the daily QA speed measurement. Replacement of
the reflective tape resulted in greater accuracy and less variability in the QA roll speed
measurements and a speed adjustment of <0.5% was necessary.
All daily dynamometer coastdowns were performed with an inertia of 3500 pounds and a
load setting of 6.0 Hp @ 50 mph (indicated). Daily dynamometer coastdown times and speeds
are presented in Figures 2-2 and 2-3, respectively. During Round 1, daily measured coastdown
2-4
-------
times ranged from 22.38 to 24.62 seconds, but remained between 23 and 24 seconds for the
majority of test days, with no trends toward increasing or decreasing times. This is a good
indicator that no problems were developing in the dynamometer that would affect frictional
losses or vehicle loading; i.e., the dynamometer was functioning consistently throughout Round
1. During Round 2, coastdown times were shorter than in Round 1 and ranged from 20.5 to 23.09
seconds. As Round 2 progressed, coastdown times generally increased and by the end of Round
2, coastdown times were approximately the same as found in Round 1. The faster coastdown
times found in the beginning of Round 2 appear to coincide with the colder test days, in which
dynamometer frictional (bearing) losses were presumably greater. A dynamometer roller bearing
began to deteriorate on January 23, 2005 and was replaced the next day, January 24, 2005.
Coastdown times measured prior to and after the bearing replacement indicate that there was no
measurable change in frictional losses.
2.3.1 Setup and Calibration of Instruments and Samplers
DRI installed and operated a suite of instruments to provide continuous PM analysis and
to collect batch samples of particle and gaseous exhaust components for later analysis in
accordance with the methods and procedures specified in the project QAPP. These instruments
collected sample air from the dynamometer dilution system via two isokinetic probes, provided
by Bevilacqua-Knight Inc (BKI) and EPA, were inserted within 5 cm of the center line of the
CVS dilution tunnel prior to a 90-degree bend in the dilution tunnel. Figure 2-4 illustrates the
sample train as it was installed during Rounds 1 and 2, and Figures 2-5 and 2-6 present
photographs of some of the instrumentation used. Heated conductive lines (47°C) carried air
from the probes to the continuous instruments. Approximately 2.3 meters of heated (47°C),
insulated 3/8" ID copper tubing was used to carry sample air to the time-integrated samplers3. As
shown in the Figure 2-4 schematic, a small 2 liter stainless steel chamber containing a PM2.5 size
cut cyclone (Bendix 240) was included in the sampling lines just before they entered the filter
samplers. Both the cyclone chambers and sampler plenum or diffuser were heated to 47C and
insulated.
! Transport times were calculated to be 12 msec in the heated lines, and less than 1 second for the cyclone chambers.
2-5
-------
^
Q_
cr
1750
Control Chart for POP Speeds
A A -r-v
DuDDDV%V^X ^5^ ^SV=^^^
1
Day*
— •— Round 1— *— Round 2
Figure 2-1. Control Chart for Daily POP Speeds
Coastdown Times
@3500# and 6.0 Hp Indicated
Day*
Round 1 —*— Round 2
Figure 2-2. Control Chart for Daily Dynamometer Coastdown Times
ndicated Speed
3
^
&
(f)
"ro
<
b
1
1 .02
1 .01 5
1 .01
1 .005
1
0.995
0.99
Control Chart for Dynamometer Speed
n ; i
A
^jKk^^t^N^^ R /V D A
*rW^\lhJ^j^^
- \\ ° "^--^Wx^ 2
1 ^
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Day*
—•—Round 1^ • Round 2
Figure 2-3. Control Chart for Daily Dynamometer Speeds
2-6
-------
PM2.5
CYCLONE
•TIGF FILTER
XAD
CARTRIDGE
CVS 10cm, 5 1pm
, 5 1pm
MER
[ROL
i
i
i
i
HEATE
CONTRC
1m, 4.5 1pm
QCM CART SYSTEM
(mass)
•PM2.5IMPACTORS
s2m, 4.5 1pm
DataRAM
(light
scattering)
PHOTOACOUSTIC
(black carbon)
DusTrak
(light
scattering)
Figure 2-4. Schematic of Sampling Train with Flow Rates.
(Heated Tubing is Shown as Double Lines, all heated components are maintained at 47± 2 °C)
2-7
-------
The following instruments were operated continuously during all tests:
A Photoacoustic instrument was designed and built at DRI. It continuously measures the
concentration of light-absorbing material (primarily BC) in the airstream by the photoacoustic
principle, in which the absorption of modulated light by particles results in thermal-acoustic
pulses that can be detected by a highly-sensitive transducer and phase-locked amplifier. The
measurement does not depend on flow rate, but flow was maintained at about 1 1pm with heated
(47°C) sample lines.
The Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) Cart System. This system was developed by
Booker Systems specifically for the Kansas City (KC) project and is now being manufactured by
SENSORS, Inc. The system, an integration of five separate components, is illustrated in Figure
2-5 and pictured in Figure 2-6. Sample air from the CVS dilution tunnel is passed through a 2.5
micron particulate pre-classifier to a micro proportional sampler (MPS) where it is either diluted
or bypassed and directed to a valve unit in the flow controller system (FCS). The MPS is a
clean-air dilution system used to reduce the dynamic range of the source aerosol concentration
(Brockmann, 1984). The FCS, under control of a computer, will pass diluted, undiluted, or
filtered ambient air to the QCM at a rate of 1 1pm depending on the expected concentration of the
particulate emissions. There the QCM monitors the accumulated mass of particles on a quartz
surface in real-time (Dickens and Booker, 1998). The MPS, FCS, and QCM operate at a
controlled temperature of 47 + 2 °C. The cart in which they are mounted is also temperature
controlled at 47 ±2 °C. After passing through the QCM, the sample air dew point (DP) is
measured continuously using a dew point (DP) monitor (Vaisala, model M170). The computer
acts as both a system control and data acquisition system for the MPS, FCS, QCM and DP
monitor.
The QCM cart system was used during Part 1 of the Kansas City study as described
above. The only change made for Part 2 of the KC study was the incorporation of the DP
measurement into the QCM. The DP monitor was used during Part 2 as a quality assurance
backup measurement. Quality Assurance for the QCM Cart System consisted of activities in
three periods associated with the tests; immediately before the tests, during the tests, and during
the reduction of data collected during the tests. These activities are summarized below:
o Immediately before the tests - All parameters on the QCM Cart are calibrated and
adjusted by the manufacturer. Critical flow quantities are calibrated using both a
Gilibrator (Gillian, Inc.) and a TSI model 4043 flow monitor (TSI Inc.). Both of these
are transfer standards traceable to NIST standards. Pressure sensors are adjusted
accordingly. Temperatures are calibrated using a platinum resistance thermometer. The
sample transport flow heated lines are adjusted using K type thermocouples. These are
then used to control the heated lines in use. Crystal frequency differences are checked
using known mass loadings determined using an analytical gravimetric balance. Sample
transport flow is determined using SKC flow controlled pumps (Model 2000). The
calibration of these is tested using the TSI model 4043 and Biometrics model 2000 flow
standards. The Biometrics flow monitor qualifies as a secondary standard traceable to
NIST. In addition to these measures, the QCM's response to changes in sample air
humidity is determined using the Vaisala, model M170 dew-point monitor.
2-8
-------
o Procedures Followed During the Tests - Quality assurance during the tests consists of
providing operational logs of instrument operation. This is done in two parts: first, the
instrument operator keeps a personal log noting all conditions that might affect the
quality of the QCM data. This includes general test conditions such as dynamometer
operation and test weather conditions. Since the control computer displays all QCM
parameters in real time, crystal frequency and resulting mass collection, sample flow,
temperatures, and operational pressures, the operator can also assess failures in QCM
operation. An example of this is failure of the quartz crystal frequency during periods
when it overloads. Secondly, in addition to the operators log, the control computer
creates a primary operation log for the QCM by logging all internal parameters for the
instrument. This, in addition to the operator's log, represents the primary QA record for
the QCM. Parameters logged by the QCM are listed in Table 4-30 of Section 4. During
the test, sample transport flow is checked weekly using the TSI 4043 flow monitor.
Dilution flow is also checked and the TSI flow monitor is then used to provide a
continuous monitor of QCM sample flow. Periodic checks of this monitor's output are
recorded in the operator's log.
o Post Test Reduction of Data - Reduction of the QCM mass data provides an opportunity
to bring to bear all of the QA records created before and during the tests. As the data are
reduced, the operator's log and the primary QA record are used to assess the validity of
the results and generate QA indicators for voided data and data that should be treated as
questionable pending further investigation. These indicators are listed in Table 4-32.
The Nephelometer - DataRAM is another commercially available portable monitor for
particulate matter, which operates on the same principle as the DustTrak but uses two
wavelengths for more uniform response to varying particle sizes. The measurement does not
depend on flow rate, but flow was maintained at 2 1pm with heated (47°C) sample lines.
The DustTrak is a commercially available portable monitor for particulate matter. The
TSI DustTrak estimates the concentration of particulate mass by measuring the intensity of light
scattered perpendicular to a laser beam directed through the airflow stream. The measurement
does not depend on flow rate, but flow was maintained at about 1.5 1pm with heated (47°C)
sample lines.
Time-integrated samples for laboratory analysis were collected during each unified cycle
test and a 60-minute tunnel blank each day as follows using specially adapted samplers designed
and constructed at DRI:
2-9
-------
Ambient
AIR
SAMPLE
DILUTED
SAMPLE
COMPUTER
CONTROL
DATA
ACQUISITION
Figure 2-5. Components of the QCM Cart System
2-10
-------
Teflon & Quartz filter sampler
Heated lines attached to probes into CVS tunnel
QCM (blue case on left) and photoacoustic instrument (right side)
Figure 2-6. Onsite Sampling Train
2-11
-------
Figure 2-7. KC Facility Instrumentation
2-12
-------
Filter samples were collected during each phase of the unified cycle tests using
procedures and sampler design based on the widely used DRI Sequential Filter Sampler. A
similar sampler was used in the Gasoline Diesel PM Split Study (Lawson et al, 2006) and was
shown to collect equivalent PM mass to direct sampling from the CVS dilution tunnel. These
tests were conducted to verify that no significant particle losses or adsorption artifacts occurred
in the sampling train even with a much longer residence time and without temperature control.
See Figure S-l in Appendix MM (2006 Gasoline Diesel PM Split Study) for more information.
Pre-weighed Gelman polymethylpentane ringed, 2.0 mm pore size, 47 mm diameter
PTFE Teflon-membrane Teflo filters (No. RPJ047) collected particles for measurement of
gravimetric mass and elements. Pallflex 47 mm diameter pre-fired quartz-fiber filters (#2500
QAT-UP) were used for water-soluble chloride, nitrate and sulfate and for organic and elemental
carbon measurements. Sample air was drawn from the CVS via %" heated copper tubing to a
small heated stainless steel chamber. The sample air exited via a PM2.5 cyclone contained in the
chamber to a heated diffusing chamber approximately 50 cm tall and 35 cm in diameter,
manufactured from anodized aluminum, containing a temperature and relative humidity (RH)
probe. From this chamber, which was necessary to allow the sample airstream to track from the
inlet line to the filter ports located radially around the base without any particle loss due to
impaction4, the sample air exited through two filter cartridges. Up to eight cartridges could be
installed in the base of the diffusing chamber, allowing four successive pairs of filters to sample
without changing cartridges. Airflow through the cartridges was switched by means of
microprocessor controlled relays and solenoid valves, that responded to TTL line digital signals
from the dynamometer control. A 30 second delay was included to account for transport time
thru the dynamometer and sampling system, based on empirical data collected with the
continuous instruments. Flow rates for each filter were set to 56 1pm by adjustable valves to give
a combined flow of approximately 113 1pm as required by the inlet cyclone, and monitored by
TSI flowmeters with serial data outputs. A single oil-less pump was used to draw air through the
sampler.
Samples were collected by a separate sampler for determination of particulate and semi-
volatile organic compounds on Pallflex TX40HI20-WW 102 mm diameter Teflon-impregnated
glass fiber (TIGF) filters followed by glass cartridges containing Aldrich Chemical Company,
Inc. 20-60 mesh Amberlite XAD-4 (polystyrene-divinylbenzene) adsorbent resins at a flow rate
of 112 1pm. The material collected on these media is removed by solvent extraction and analyzed
at DRI by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. A single filter and adsorbent pair were
collected for each unified cycle, combining Phases 1, 2 and 3. Sampling was suspended during
the 10-minute soak period by turning off the pump. Sample air was drawn from the
dynamometer CVS via V^" heated copper tubing to a small heated stainless steel chamber. The
sample air exited via a PM2.5 cyclone contained in the chamber to a heated diffusing chamber,
containing a thermistor temperature probe, 42 cm long and 9.5 cm in diameter. In this chamber
the sample air decelerates and expands sufficiently to deposit uniformly on the 100 cm diameter
filter face as it exits through the filter followed by the XAD cartridge. Flow rates were
4 Inspection of the interior of the sampler plenum/diffusing chamber after the completion of both Rounds of testing
showed no detectable particle deposits. The residence time in the chamber is difficult to estimate, since the sample
air is expected to track directly to the filters, but was observed to be <30 seconds in smoke tests conducted with a
DustTrak instrument connected to one of the sampler ports.
2-13
-------
approximately 113 1pm as required by the inlet cyclone, and were monitored by an in-line TSI
4000 mass-flow meter. A single oil-less pump, switched on and off by a relay linked to TTL line
signals from the dynamometer control, was used to draw air through the sampler.
Aldehydes were collected on 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) cartridges using a 6-
channel sampler with integrated pump and mass flow controller. Sample air was drawn from the
heated cyclone chamber via a Vi" diameter Teflon hose at 500 cc/min. A single cartridge was
exposed for the duration of the 3 Phases of the unified cycle. Sampling was suspended during the
10-minute soak by switching to an unused channel by a relay linked to TTL line signals from the
dynamometer control. As stated in Section 4.3 of the QAPP, for commercial 2,4-DNPH
cartridges (Waters Sep-Pak XpoSure Aldehyde Sampler), DRI analyzed 5% of the purchased
cartridges to ascertain the blank variability. Another 5% were analyzed if the initial data showed
that the blank variability was marginally acceptable (at or slightly higher than 1/3 of the desired
lower quantifiable limits (LQL)). This is necessary because unless cartridges are prepared in-
house there is no other indication of the quality of the product, such as reagent and blank
cartridge purity. In carbonyl measurements, the blank variability is the single most important
factor in determining the lower quantifiable limit of the measurement; other factors such as flow
rate, and analytical variability are secondary in importance.
VOC: Sample air was drawn from the heated cyclone chamber via a Vi" diameter Teflon
hose and passed through a Teflon filter and a cobalt oxide denuder coated to remove NOX before
being pumped into a Summa polished steel canister. A chemiluminescence real-time NOx
analyzer was installed downstream from the denuder to monitor its efficiency. Air flow for the
canister sampler was controlled by a needle valve to obtain the necessary flow rate to fill the
canisters to approximately 15"Hg positive pressure over the duration of the complete unified
cycle. Sampling was interrupted during the 10-minute soak by switching to a bypass channel.
The sampler draws a total flow of 2 1pm, but only about 300 cc/min of that was pumped into the
canisters. Sampling was suspended during the 10-minute soak by switching to an unused channel
by a relay linked to TTL (digital electronic) line signals from the dynamometer control.
Prior to the start of each round, all samplers were checked for leaks and the in-line flow
meters were cross-calibrated using reference flow measurement devices. Leak testing was
performed by capping the inlet lines leading to each sampler and turning on the pumps. If the
flow meter readings decreased to less than 10% of the nominal sampling flow rate in a
reasonably short time, the system was passed. If not, the source of the leak was identified and
fixed, then the test repeated. With the exception of the Teflon/Quartz filter sampler, all units
achieved near-zero flow rates during the leak test. Due to the friable nature of the pre-fired
quartz filters, it is not possible to obtain a perfect seal in the filter holders without damaging the
media, but the <10% criteria were still met for each filter individually and for the system as a
whole. In addition to the vacuum test, the sum of flows through each of the two filter cartridges
was compared to the total flow entering the inlet and found to agree within 5%.
All flowmeters were calibrated using either a Gillibrator electronic bubble meter (Gilian
Inc.) or a rotameter (Dwyer Instruments) that had been cross-calibrated with a Roots meter at
DRI. Calibration flows were measured at the inlet point of each sampler (or outlet for the
canister sampler) with appropriate sampling media installed. The resulting multi-point
calibrations were used to calculate the desired nominal flow rates, and these were marked on a
2-14
-------
label on each flowmeter so that the operator could observe any deviations during testing.
Variations in nominal flow rate due to sampler problems were recorded in a logbook. The
sampler flow calibrations are shown in Tables 2-2 and 2-3. Flows were audited periodically
using the same reference devices. If the deviation from the original calibration was 10% or more
the flowmeter would be re-calibrated, however, this did not prove necessary at any time. Since
the DNPH sampler used an electronic mass/flow controller, only a 1-point flow audit was
performed on that unit between Rounds.
Table 2-2. Round 1 Sampler Calibration and Audit Results
XAD
Teflon
Quartz
DNPH
rotameter
scfh
273
250
227
125
110
140
124
97
152
Qactual
slpm
128
117
106
58
51
65
57
45
71
0.534
0.555
0.508
0.531
flowmeter
slpm
121
112
100
54.7
47.6
61
54.7
41.8
67.4
0.498
0.519
0.473
0.499
ERR
-6%
-4%
-6%
-6%
-7%
-6%
-5%
-7%
-5%
-7%
-7%
-7%
-6%
regression stats
r2
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
m
1.03
1.06
1.01
1.02
b
2.87
0.40
2.14
0.02
target
flow
113
56.5
56.5
0.500
audit
reading
107
53
54
0.465
ERR
5%
6%
5%
8%
Qactual = flow rate determined by reference method
slpm = standard liters per minute (20C, 1 atm)
scfh = standard cubic feet per hour (20C, 1 atm)
ERR = (indicated or target flow - actual flow)/actual flow
Regression stats on the slope of the line: y = mx + b
2-15
-------
Table 2-3. Round 2 Sampler Calibration and Audit Results
XAD
Teflon
Quartz
DNPH
rotameter
scfh
255
230
187
133
114
98
140
119
99
Qactual
slpm
123
111
90
64
55
47
67
57
48
flowmeter
slpm
122.5
110
90
65
55
46
65
55
45
ERR
0%
-1%
0%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-4%
-6%
regression stats
r2
1.00
1.00
1.00
m
0.99
1.13
1.01
b
0.75
-7.04
-3.2
target
flow
113
56.5
56.5
495
audit
reading
113
57
54
485
ERR
0%
0%
4%
2%
For each integrated sample, the run number, start and stop time, elapsed time, initial and
final flow rate, and any exceptional occurrences were recorded on log sheets that were kept with
the media at all times. Bar coded stickers with unique media IDs were attached to all media and
their corresponding log sheets for tracking. Immediately after the conclusion of each test cycle,
the media were repacked with the log sheets and stored in a refrigerator, except for the canisters,
which were packed and shipped via 2-day express to DRI each day. All media were packed into
coolers with ice packs and shipped overnight back to DRI where they were logged in and placed
in cold storage until analysis. Media were shipped on a near weekly basis during Round 1.
Continuous data were backed up via the wireless network and processed at the end of each
sampling day to determine phase-averaged values. Run number, date, time, and vehicle license
plate number were attached to all files to identify the data.
2.3.2 Additional Support Equipment
efforts.
Table 2-4 lists equipment that was either rented or purchased to support the sampling
2-16
-------
Table 2-4. Sampling Support Equipment Rented or Purchased by ERG, On-Site
Name
Oil-less Air
Compressors
AC Electricity
Generator
CVS Dilution Air
Dryer
Refrigerator
Freezers
Purpose
To supply clean, dry
dilution air to the micro-
dilution system used with
the QCM.
To supply power for the
CVS dilution air heater.
To reduce CVS dilution air
humidity.
To store particulate filter
media.
To store fuel samples.
Notes
Purchased. Provides up to 5 SCFM at 100 psig. Has
a 25 gal. tank. Water trap and filtration provided by
EPA.
Rented from United Rentals. Wacker model G-50.
50-kilowatt capacity. Diesel fueled. Power umbilical
provided by BKI.
Rented from United Rentals. TempAir (Rupp
Industries) model TD 400. Dries up to 400 CFM.
Requires 230 V, 1 phase, 30 A, electric supply.
Portable desiccant-type dehumidifier. Alumina
silicate wheel continuously absorbs gas-phase water.
Heated slip-stream of dried air re-directed back to
used section of wheel to desorb water and regenerate
the wheel. These were used primarily during Round
1.
Purchased. 14 cubic feet, upright.
Purchased. 10 cubic feet and 24 cubic feet, chests.
2.4 PEMS Setup
The eight portable emissions monitoring systems (PEMS) and associated equipment EPA
provided for Round 1 of the study were also used for Round 2 testing. These systems, the
SEMTECH-G manufactured by Sensors, Inc. were used vehicle THC, CO, CO2, and NOX
emissions during each vehicle's preconditioning run, emissions during dynamometer testing (in
tandem with the dynamometer bench), and in some instances emissions from participants
vehicles after the vehicles were picked up from testing. Details on PEMS testing are provided in
Section 4.7. Differences between Round 1 and Round 2 PEMS testing are described in the
following section.
2.4.1 Changes from Round 1
Round 2 test procedures, equipment, and testing conditions differed somewhat from those
during Round 1. The most notable differences are discussed in an Appendix to the updated
QAPP, and are presented below:
Onsite PEMS repair support
Onsite PEMS repair support was available throughout the Round 2, and greatly reduced
equipment downtime and shortages. Most PEMS problems were minor issues such as stuck
solenoids, loose or dirty contacts and fittings, water in the system, or blown relays, and were able
to be repaired quickly. Most large repairs, such as system module and CPU board replacements,
could also be accomplished onsite (after receipt of necessary repair materials).
2-17
-------
Temperatures and ambient conditions
Round 2 testing was conducted during the winter, as opposed to the Round 1 summer
study. Since this portion of the study was to be conducted at ambient temperatures, an enclosed
and heated structure was erected in which to conduct PEMS installation activities. This
prevented operation of the units sub-freezing temperatures (beyond their specified operating
temperature range). Operation of the PEMS units below freezing temperatures was occasionally
necessary, and resulted in various operational problems, such water freezing in the FID exhaust
drain lines and internal filters, and freezing in the flowmeter pressure-differential measurement
tubes and exhaust sample lines. The signal transducer boxes used with the new pressure-
differential flowmeters occasionally would not warm up to operating temperature (as indicated
by the "warm-up" indicator LED), and some emissions measurement drift was seen during some
conditioning runs (as evidenced by pre-test and post-test audits). This drift may be due to
auditing the PEMS in the heated installation bay and then performing the conditioning test in a
vehicle's trunk or bed at ambient temperatures.
Flowmeter changes
Hot-wire anemometer-style flowmeters were used throughout the Round 1 summer
portion of the study. These were replaced with pressure-differential style flowmeters for Round
2 of the study. These new flowmeters transmitted pressure signals through flexible tubes to a
signal transducer box which converted the pressure-differential signal and exhaust temperature
measurement into an exhaust mass flow rate determination.
Flowmeter mounting changes
License plate brackets and suction cup clamp assemblies were primarily used to install
the flowmeters used during Round 1 of the study. This posed concerns associated with
participants or pedestrians burning themselves (particularly on driveaway testing) or the
assemblies falling off. Occasionally, flowmeters were hung underneath the rear of the vehicle,
which was generally laborious and exposed the flowmeter to water and possible dragging
damage. The new pressure-differential flowmeters were significantly larger and heavier, so
common bicycle racks were used for flowmeter installations during Round 2. Wire meshes were
secured to these racks to allow mounting of license plates and to protect against burns.
Software changes
Several PEMS software changes were implemented prior to or during Round 2. This new
software allowed use of the new pressure-differential flowmeters, and it also allowed activation
of auto-zero and automatic FID heater shut-down after a period of time (auto-zeros were
performed only on drive-away testing). Another software update involved adding a "session
manager" which "bundled" all the audits and second by second test information into one file.
The following software changes were implemented throughout the study (including both Rounds
1 and 2):
• Rollout beginning July 12, 2004: Software Version 9.03
• Rollout beginning August 17, 2004: Software Version 9.03 SP1
2-18
-------
• Rollout beginning November 23, 2004: Software Version 9.04
• Rollout beginning December 6, 2004: Software Version 9.05 SP1
• Rollout beginning December 16, 2004: Software Version 9.05 SP2
Testing was continued with Software Version 9.05 SP2 through the end of Round 2.
QCM changes
The QCM cart system used during Part 1 of the Kansas City study is described in Section
2.3.1. DP measurement was incorporated into the QCM for Part 2 of the KC study, in order to
provide a QA backup measurement. In addition, relative humidity (RH) and the relative
humidity temperature were added to the list of parameters recorded by the QCM System
Computer Control/Data Acquisition System, as described in Section 4.5.2.2.
2.4.2 Procedural changes between Rounds 1 and 2
The equipment downtime experienced during Round 1 was greatly reduced during Round
2 through the addition of an on-site PEMS repair and support person. Most repairs were minor,
such as stuck solenoids, loose or dirty contacts and fittings, water in the system, or blown relays,
and were able to be repaired quickly. Most large repairs, such as system module and CPU board
replacements, were also accomplished onsite (after necessary repair items were received onsite).
This increase in equipment up-time allowed significantly more driveaways to be conducted in
Round 2 than were possible during Round 1 of the study.
As mentioned in Section 2.4.1, the hot-wire anemometer-style flowmeters used
throughout the Round 1 summer portion of the study were replaced with pressure-differential
style flowmeters for Round 2 of the study. Measurements from the original hot-wire
anemometer flowmeters were adversely affected by heat radiation effects at low vehicle speeds
and idle. Since convective cooling minimized these effects when vehicles were in motion, low-
speed and idle flow measurements were biased low. This bias was eliminated with the use of
pressure-differential style flowmeters provided for Round 2 of the study. These flowmeters
relied on a bank of differential pressure sensors (as opposed to a hot-wire anemometer) in order
to determine corrected mass exhaust flowrates. However, the orifices in the differential pressure
sensors used in these new flowmeters were susceptible to particulate matter clogging and
moisture freezing. This condition was minimized as much as possible by thoroughly purging all
orifices with high-pressure dry compressed nitrogen prior to each use, and by maintaining the
flowmeters and tubing assemblies in above-freezing conditions.
Earlier in the study, problems were encountered with preventing moisture and exhaust
fumes from entering vehicles during testing. The new flowmeters required additional tubing to
be routed out of the trunk (generally requiring the trunk to be propped open wider). Standard
household pipe insulation purchased at a hardware store was found to fairly effectively seal
trunks. Carbon monoxide detectors were used to ensure vehicle exhaust was not entering the
passenger compartment.
As mentioned in Section 2.4.1, Round 2 testing was conducted during the winter, as
opposed to the Round 1 summer study. Operation of the PEMS units below freezing
2-19
-------
temperatures was occasionally necessary, and proved to be problematic because of water
freezing in system components and measurement drift. Battery life seemed greatly reduced
during Round 2 testing, perhaps due to battery cycle fatigue (these were the original batteries
used since the start of the study) and also possibly due to operation in the cold temperatures.
In order to prevent trunks from inadvertently popping open, as would occasionally
happen with the original vice-grip-devised trunk latches, heavy-duty zip-ties were used (with
metal rings installed in the trunk latch assembly) to secure trunks. These zip ties, which are
typically used for securing building ventilation and may be found at a typical hardware store,
also prevented motorists from tampering with the PEMS units installed in trunks during
driveaway tests.
Experience gained during Round 1 of the study helped streamline Round 2 testing. For
example, installation procedures and sequences were modified in order to minimize lost time in
the event of equipment malfunctions. Certain "tricks" and procedures for equipment software
helped expedite installations and minimize system resets. The incorporation of a session
manager into the host software also allowed consolidation of audit and test information into one
test file, thereby expediting equipment setup and reducing time needed for test processing and
analysis.
2-20
-------
3.0 Vehicle Recruitment
3.1 Recruitment Process
The recruitment process required deriving a targeted (stratified) sample of vehicles from
a cohort of 2000 households generated through random sampling in the Kansas City
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The Mid-American Regional Council (MARC) completed
a comprehensive travel survey of Kansas City regional households in spring of 2004.5 That
study's resulting dataset was reviewed for use as the initial cohort of households. As
demonstrated in more detail in the next section (3.2), the MARC data, when compared with
Census 2000 data at the household and person levels using a number of demographic and
geographic characteristics, created a cohort that represents the Kansas City MSA population. As
a result, there was no need to conduct a survey of households to develop the initial sample cohort
for this study. This dataset was the primary dataset for recruitment during Rounds 1 and 2 of the
study. Vehicles were recruited from the Kansas City Metropolitan Area (KCMA) (see Figure 3-
1). The Kansas City MSA counties included:
• Johnson County, KS
• Leavenworth County, KS
• Wyandotte County, KS
• Clay County, MO
• Cass County, MO
• Jackson County, MO
• Platte County, MO
' Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, http://www.marc.org/transportation/pdf/travelsurvev2003.pdf
3-1
-------
PLATTE
Prepared by MARC's Research Services Department
Figure 3-1. Kansas City Metropolitan Area
The use of the MARC 2004 Household Travel Study (MARC Study) as the cohort from
which to recruit vehicles allowed vehicle recruitment to begin earlier than planned in Round 1.
It also provided, inherent in the data set, household data elements including year, make, model,
body type, and fuel type for each household vehicle, home address and preferred method for
contacting owner. All participants in the MARC study were aged 21 or older.
One of the challenges of Round 1 testing was that there were fewer than expected older
vehicles available for recruitment. In fact, by the end of Round 1 testing, the available vehicle
pool for recruiting the oldest vehicles, i.e., Strata 1, 2, 5, 6 (Pre-1981 and 1981-1990 trucks and
cars) had been virtually exhausted. This posed a challenge for Round 2 testing.
Fortunately, the Kansas and Missouri Vehicle Registration database provided a large pool
of vehicles that can be sampled and recruited for testing. That database was used to draw
representative stratified random samples for recruiting as many vehicles as necessary to achieve
the desired sampling targets. Moreover, to ensure adequate participation, Round 2 recruitment
3-2
-------
activities commenced with the older vehicle samples, and then turned to the more prevalent
newer vehicles.
As a final note on sampling, the use of the vehicle registration files did not conflict with
the use of the MARC RDD sampling frame for Round 1 (and Round 2 of the more prevalent
vehicle strata). The use of DMV lists triggered the adoption of an efficient dual frame sample
design ("dual" because there are two sources of sample - and RDD household sample, and the
DMV list of vehicles). The adoption of a dual frame design in this case is good science because
(1) the DMV frame (like the RDD frame) is complete, with virtually 100% coverage of the
vehicle fleet population; and (2) the efficiency of identifying rare or low prevalence vehicles
(e.g., older trucks) from the DMV list is considerable relative to the alternative of large scale
screening of households.
Incentives Test
Prior to the start of testing in Round 1, an incentive survey was conducted to identify the
appropriate levels of incentives necessary to ensure sufficient regional vehicles would be
available for the emissions testing program. The survey was successful in identifying specific
levels of incentives and particular groups of respondents to help in identifying the appropriate
incentive packages to initially offer potential participants. It also provided some initial insight
into participation rates, especially on those who refused to participate in the study and the level
of incentives that would convert them to a prospective participant. The MARC study database
served as the sample for the survey.
Overall, the program description and discussion of incentives were sufficient to generate
interest in the program. Two-thirds of all incentives test respondents agreed to schedule their
vehicles for testing when the program would begin.
In terms of the incentives, the survey provided excellent guidance in terms of structure
and application. Most respondents indicated that a full-size rental car would be sufficient for the
24- to 48-hour period during which their vehicles would be at the testing facility. Variances in
acceptable cash levels led to the recommendation of offering $75 and staging incentives in $25
increments up to $200 for those who refused to participate.
Incentives were utilized in both Round 1 and Round 2 of the study. The following table
provides a summary of the total number of incentives offered and amount paid for each Round
and for the study as a whole. The average incentive amount needed for those that actually had
their vehicle tested was about $113.00.
A summary of the incentives offered during the study is shown in Table 3-1.
5-3
-------
Table 3-1. Summary of Incentives for the KC Study
Incentive Level
$0-$50
$50-$100
$100-$150
$150-$200
$200-$250
$250-$300
$300-$350
$350-$400
>$400
Totals
Round 1 Counts
10
81
166
45
9
3
1
1
2
318
Round 2 Counts
13
85
182
27
44
7
2
6
0
366
Total
23
166
348
72
53
10
3
7
2
684
Sampling
A questionnaire guided interviewers in screening households for vehicles that met the
project needs (see Appendices C and D for all recruitment-related materials). Some vehicle types
were excluded from the study, and the vehicle characteristics (e.g. body configuration) were
incorporated into the questionnaire. Those vehicles that qualified were flagged for possible
recruitment. Body configuration was used because certain size vehicles could not be
accommodated on the dynamometer.
The sampling process was very flexible which allowed for quick changes in scheduling
vehicles for testing. A vehicle file used for sampling was posted daily to the project website,
along with flags to indicate eligible vehicles, those sampled, and status of scheduling (waiting to
be scheduled, scheduled, tested, etc.).
Scheduling Calls
As vehicles were sampled, the households were re-contacted for scheduling (if not done
at the time of sampling). The following parameters guided the scheduling process:
1) Vehicles were scheduled for drop off and pick up daily except for Sundays. A
master scheduling list that showed valid scheduling dates was prepared.
2) In general, vehicles dropped off Monday through Friday were picked up Tuesday
through Saturday. Vehicles dropped off on Saturday were picked up on Monday.
Occasionally, vehicles were kept for more than 24-hour periods (depending on
drop-off times).
3) Participants were asked to drop off vehicles between 7 and 9 am, and to pick them
up between 4 and 6 pm the following day. Special times and pick-up options
were offered, depending on the importance of the vehicle to the testing process.
5-4
-------
A daily scheduling file that contains information on vehicles scheduled from the current
day onward was posted on an on-line Project site. Contained in this file was the vehicle make,
model, and year, along with owner name, home phone, and alternative number, as well as the
incentive package promised/expected.
Packets
Scheduled participants received via U.S. mail a thank you letter, a map to the testing site
(personalized from Yahoo.com), a general information brochure about the project, and contact
information. The packet also included a copy of a vehicle owner survey and a checklist
reminding participants to bring their driver's license and insurance card. The cover letter
referenced the agreed-upon incentive.
Reminder Call
The afternoon / evening prior to the scheduled test date, participants received a reminder
call regarding their appointment time for bringing the specific vehicle to the testing site.
Toll-free Hotline
A toll-free hotline was maintained for participants to use for questions and canceling or
rescheduling their testing appointment.
3.2 Cohort / Vehicle Frame Analysis
Meeting the study goals required deriving a targeted (stratified) sample of vehicles from a
cohort of 2000 households generated through random sampling in the KCMSA. The
methodology for generating the sample originally called for conducting a Random Digit Dialing
(RDD) telephone survey of households (HH) in the KCMSA. This methodology relied on two
key underlying assumptions:
• An RDD sample of HHs will generate a representative sample of the population
in the Kansas City MSA, and
• The cohort of HHs participating in the RDD survey will provide a representative
sample of vehicles for emissions testing.
Because NuStats had recently completed the 2004 Kansas City Travel Behavior Survey
for MARC, the use of the survey data (the survey was conducted in Spring 2004 using an RDD
sample design) was recommended. NuStats conducted a comparison of the MARC data with
Census 2000 data at the household and person levels using a number of demographic and
geographic characteristics. As evidenced in Tables 3-2 and 3-3, using the MARC RDD sample
to create a cohort of households satisfactorily represented the Kansas City MSA population on a
number of demographic / geographic characteristics.6 The only substantial difference appears in
6 The MARC survey distributions are unweighted (raw), allowing for more informed assessment of the product of RDD
sampling. It should be noted that survey data are typically weighted to correct for discrepancies between known Census
population distributions (for selected demographic variables) and the unweighted survey results. But a comparison of weighted
survey data and the Census distributions would mask any real differences between survey and Census distributions for those
3-5
-------
the non-white race comparisons, and this is easily explainable and not of concern for research
purposes. First, it is well known that the race/ethnicity questions were problematic in Census
2000, and the MARC RDD and Census white population percentages match up well. Secondly,
and perhaps more importantly, the income distributions of the RDD sample and Census align
well, suggesting that the RDD survey captured a representative sample of the population
according to income (which is associated with race).
Table 3-2. Demographic Comparison of MARC RDD Survey of Households and
Census 2000 Distributions
Demographic Characteristic
RDD Survey (n=4,001)|Census 2000
Household size
1
2
3
4+
total
26.8%
33.3%
16.0%
23.9%
100.0%
27.4%
33.0%
16.2%
23.4%
100.0%
HH Vehicles
0
1
2
3+
total
5.8%
32.9%
42.7%
18.6%
100.0%
7.4%
33.9%
41.7%
17.0%
100.0%
HH Income
<15k
15k -< 25k
25k - < 50k
50k -< 100k
100k +
(refusal)
total
9.9%
10.2%
30.2%
35.9%
13.8%
(5.9%)
100.0%
12.2%
11.3%
30.1%
33.6%
12.8%
—
100.0%
Residency Type
single family
all other
total
76.8%
23.2%
100.0%
69.0%
31.0%
100.0%
Race
White
Black/ African American
Other
total
81.3%
10.7%
8.0%
100.0%
81.6%
14.1%
4.3%
100.0%
Respondent Age
<20
20-24
25-54
55-64
29.6%
4.3%
43.3%
9.9%
29.1%
6.1%
45.3%
8.2%
demographic variables that were used in generating the weighting adjustments. Thus, the survey data used in the comparison
were not weighted.
3-6
-------
65 +
refusal
total
12.8%
(1.2%)
100%
11.3%
—
100.0%
Table 3-3. Comparison of MARC ROD Survey and Census 2000 Geographic
Distributions
County, State:
Cass County, MO
Clay County, MO
Jackson County, MO
Platte County, MO
Johnson County, KS
Leavenworth County, KS
Wyandotte County, KS
total
Census 2000
4.6%
11.1%
40.6%
4.5%
26.6%
3.5%
9.1%
100%
ROD Survey (N = 4,001)
4.9%
12.3%
39.9%
4.6%
26.1%
3.3%
8.9%
100%
Table 3-2 presents a number of (unweighted) comparisons of the household and person
level characteristics from the RDD MARC survey to that of the Census 2000.
Table 3-3 presents the distributions of the (unweighted) RDD MARC sample and the
Census 2000 on the County level.
3.3 Cohort Respondent / Nonrespondent Analysis
In the process of conducting the MARC household travel survey (which forms the
foundation of the cohort for the EPA Emissions Testing Project), NuStats randomly sampled and
contacted 5,500 regional households. Of these, 4,001 agreed to provide their information and
3,049 ultimately completed all aspects of the survey. Non-respondents are those 1,500
households that were contacted and firmly refused to participate.
A discussion of the characteristics for those 1,500 households that chose not to participate
is very limited. Most refusals took place during the introduction to the study, prior to the
interviewer obtaining any demographic information about the household. The only item that can
be reviewed is the geographic distribution of refusers, since all sampled telephone numbers were
initially flagged with the anticipated county of residence. This distribution is shown in Table 3-
4 and the proportion of refusals matched the proportion of participants by county of residence.
Of those 4,001 households that agreed to participate in the MARC survey, 2,887 with at
least one vehicle comprised the Round 1 sample. Of those, a total of 1,236 were contacted about
participation in this Round 1 emissions testing effort. Of these households, 221 ultimately
agreed to participate in the survey. The remainder either refused to participate (360), could not
be contacted after multiple attempts (497), or their phone numbers were no longer valid (106).
On average, each household was attempted 2.8 times. The overall response rate for the study
was 21%.
Of the 221 households that ultimately had their vehicles tested, 23 had initially refused to
participate during the recruitment call but were converted after another focused attempt. An
5-7
-------
additional 29 households cancelled their initial scheduled testing, but agreed again to have the
vehicle tested later during Round 1. Tables 3-5, 3-6, 3-7, and 3-8 compare the Round 1
participants vs. those that refused testing in terms of the county of residence, income, and
vehicles owned. The bin breakdown of these vehicles is presented in Section 3.6.
In terms of county of residence, the refusers were most likely to come from Jackson
County, Johnson County, or Cass County. However, there was very little difference in the
proportions of refusers and regular participants by county of residence.
Table 3-4. MARC Household Survey Non-Respondents and Respondents by
County of Residence
County
Johnson County, KS
Leavenworth County, KS
Wyandotte County, KS
Clay County, MO
Cass County, MO
Jackson County, MO
Platte County, MO
Non-Responders
29.7%
3.6%
7.8%
5.5%
12.5%
37.5%
3.5%
Respondents
26.4%
3.1%
8.6%
4.8%
12.3%
40.4%
4.5%
Source: Non-Respondents based on Sample File for the Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey (KCRHTS),
unweighted. Includes all households that refused to participate in the study. Respondent proportion reflects the
weighted distribution of households participating in the survey.
Table 3-5. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by County of Residence
County
Johnson County, KS
Leavenworth County, KS
Wyandotte County, KS
Clay County, MO
Cass County, MO
Jackson County, MO
Platte County, MO
Refusers
22.2%
2.2%
9.5%
6.0%
14.0%
43.2%
2.9%
Regular Participants
25.6%
6.4%
10.4%
4.8%
9.6%
40.0%
3.2%
Source: Non-Respondents based on unweighted KCRHTS data for refusers and regular participants in Round 1 of
the study.
The refusers were more likely to report a lower income than that reported by regular
participants (22% compared to 16%, respectively).
Table 3-6. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Income Level
Income
<15,000
15,000 -< 25,000
25,000 - <50,000
50,000 - < 75,000
75,000-<100,000
Refusers
8.8%
13.5%
35.5%
18.9%
14.5%
Regular Participants
4.9%
10.6%
37.4%
20.3%
17.9%
-------
||100,000+
8.9%
Source: Non-Respondents based on unweighted KCRHTS data for refusers and regular participants in Round 1 of
the study.
The refusers were more likely to own a truck. As a result, trucks were added as part of
the rental fleet in Round 2 (note that the mitigation of such refusals by adding trucks ultimately
was inconclusive.)
Table 3-7. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Vehicle Type
Vehicle Type
Car
Truck
Refusers
79.7%
20.3%
Regular Participants
84.2%
15.8%
Source: Non-Respondents based on unweighted KCRHTS data for refusers and regular participants in Round 1 of
the study.
As was anticipated, the refusers were somewhat more likely to own an older vehicle.
Table 3-8. Round 1 Refusers and Respondents by Vehicle Year
Vehicle Year
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1996+
Refusers
9.3%
35.2%
16.4%
39.1%
Regular Participants
5.9%
39.2%
18.1%
36.9%
Source: Non-Respondents based on unweighted KCRHTS data for refusers and regular participants in Round 1 of
the study.
3.4 Cohort Recruitment Analysis
Section 3.2 defined the study cohort as being derived from the MARC 2004 household
travel study sample and demonstrated that the MARC sample represented the KCMSA. This
section compares the MARC sample with the Rounds 1 and 2 participant characteristics and the
2000 Census data for the study area.
The first comparison is on key household characteristics, including household size,
vehicles, household workers, household income, residence type, and home ownership as shown
in Table 3-9. This table shows the raw and weighted MARC sample characteristics, the raw
Rounds 1 and 2 participant characteristics, and the 2000 Census data for the study area.
5-9
-------
Table 3-9. MARC Household Characteristics Compared to Census
Characteristic
MARC
Raw Data
MARC
Weighted Data
EPA
Round
IData
EPA
Round 2
MARC
Data Only
Round 1
& Round
2
Census
Data
Household Size
1
2
3
4+
28.40%
34.00%
15.80%
21.80%
27.50%
32.90%
16.20%
23.50%
16.80%
32.80%
14.40%
36.00%
7.06%
36.47%
20.00%
36.47%
10.84%
34.94%
18.07%
36.14%
27.40%
32.90%
16.20%
23.50%
Household Vehicles
0
1
2
3+
5.30%
32.00%
44.20%
18.50%
Household Vehicles
1
2
3+
33.79%
46.67%
19.54%
7.40%
33.90%
41.70%
17.00%
0.00%
12.80%
44.80%
42.40%
0.00%
10.59%
54.12%
35.29%
0.00%
12.05%
49.40%
38.55%
7.40%
33.90%
41.70%
17.00%
(Re weighted from above to include households with 1-3+
vehicles)
36.61%
45.03%
18.36%
12.80%
44.80%
42.40%
10.59%
54.12%
35.29%
12.05%
49.40%
38.55%
36.61%
45.03%
18.36%
Geography
Urban
Suburban 1st Ring
Remainder
18.50%
26.20%
55.20%
20.60%
26.00%
53.40%
23.20%
28.80%
48.00%
12.94%
25.88%
61.18%
16.87%
29.52%
53.61%
20.60%
26.00%
53.40%
Household Income
<$15k
$15k-<$25k
$25k- < $50k
$50k-<$100k
$100k +
Income refusals
8.90%
9.50%
29.70%
37.60%
14.40%
5.50%
9.60%
9.70%
29.80%
36.10%
13.70%
5.50%
4.80%
10.40%
36.80%
37.60%
8.80%
1.60%
3.53%
7.06%
31.76%
40.00%
12.94%
4.71%
4.22%
7.83%
34.34%
40.36%
10.84%
2.41%
12.20%
11.30%
30.10%
33.60%
12.80%
~
Residence Type
Single family
All other types
78.40%
21.60%
76.90%
23.10%
87.20%
12.80%
91.76%
8.24%
87.95%
12.05%
69.00%
31.00%
Source: 2000 Census and Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey (KCRHTS), weighted. As documented
in the Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, the data were weighted by household size,
household vehicles, and geography (home location). Round 1 & Round 2 participants are summarized using raw
KCRHTS data as the EPA surveys didn't obtain demographic information.
3-10
-------
MARC Sample For the most part, the weighted data compare favorably with the census
data, indicating that the survey data set is representative of the regional population. The
difference in the distribution of respondents based on residence type can be explained somewhat
based on the proportion of sample types used in the study. Listed telephone numbers (those with
complete address information for the household) are typically associated with households of
longer tenure, which is correlated with living in a single-family dwelling and home ownership.
Renters, who are considered to be more transient and living in housing types not characterized as
single-family dwellings, may change telephone numbers more often and are typically more likely
to have a number that is incomplete or not including in the listed telephone number database.
The proportion of listed to not listed samples used in this study was 50/50, meaning that of the
40,000 pieces of sample used, 20,000 were associated with listed numbers and 20,000 were not.
An effort more focused on renters would have required the use of more unlisted than listed
numbers, which was not possible within the project's budget. Thus, the desire to achieve a good
mix of residence type was balanced with the project budget and as a result, residence type came
within 10% of the census parameters, but not within 5% like the other variables.
Round 1 Participants. The Round 1 study design called for testing a specific
combination of vehicles based on type (car vs. truck) and age. The testing goals were
disproportionate to survey universe parameters, with a higher focus on older vehicles. In
addition, only MARC households that owned vehicles could be considered for inclusion in the
study. For comparison purposes, we have excluded households with 0 vehicles in one of the
comparisons presented in Table 3-9. As a result of these various study parameters, the
characteristics of the Round 1 households differs somewhat from those of the MARC and Census
data. The Round 1 households were larger and owned more vehicles (again, given that vehicle
ownership was a requirement for participation in the study, this finding was not surprising). The
Round 1 households show a good geographic dispersion and tend to reflect more moderate
income households. In terms of home ownership, there is a significantly higher proportion living
in single-family residences. However, as with the main MARC survey, home ownership is a
secondary variable of interest so this is not of great concern.
Round 2 Participants. The Round 2 study design was similar to Round 1 and many of
the household characteristics remained relatively constant and different from the MARC and
Census data. Round 2 households were larger, owned more vehicles, reflected more moderate
income levels and most tended to own single-family residences. In contrast to Round 1, Round 2
households' geographic dispersion was less urban.
Round 2 Retests. Table 3-10 shows distribution of the Round 1 vehicles that were
retested in Round 2, along with household characteristics. The study goals required 25 such tests
to be conducted, 43 vehicles were actually retested.
3-11
-------
Table 3-10. MARC Household Characteristics for Round 1 Retests in Round 2
Characteristics
Round 1 Retest Data (%)
Household Size
1
2
3
4+
Total
9.52%
35.71%
14.29%
40.48%
100.00%
Household Vehicles
1
2
3+
Total
19.05%
54.76%
26.19%
100.00%
Household Income
0-14,999
15,000-24,999
25,000-34,999
35,000-49,999
50,000-74,999
75,000+
DK
RF
Total
4.76%
4.76%
9.52%
9.52%
21.43%
28.57%
11.90%
9.52%
100.00%
County
Johnson
Clay
Platte
Wyandotte
Jackson
Leavenworth
Cass
Total
30.95%
9.52%
21.43%
14.29%
16.67%
4.76%
2.38%
100.00%
Table 3-11 shows that the key person characteristics of MARC age and ethnicity also
track the census fairly well. The higher proportion of "other" ethnicities reflects Hispanic
respondents who identified themselves as such in answer to this question. With regard to the
Rounds 1 and 2 data, the participants tend to be younger, on average. In terms of ethnicity, the
Rounds 1 and 2 participants mirror the census extremely well.
3-12
-------
Table 3-11. MARC Person Characteristics Compared To Census
Characteristic
MARC
Raw
Data
MARC
Weighted
Data
EPA
Round 1
Data
EPA
Round 2
MARC
Data
Only
Round 1
& Round 2
Census
Data
Respondent Age
<20
20-24
25-54
55-64
65+
Respondent Ethnicity
White
Black/African American
Other
28.70%
3.60%
42.30%
10.60%
14.80%
84.80%
9.10%
6.10%
30.30%
3.60%
41.70%
9.80%
14.60%
83.40%
10.20%
6.40%
55.94%
6.64%
74.48%
15.38%
10.14%
79.20%
12.80%
8.00%
53.94%
5.45%
70.91%
20.61%
8.48%
84.71%
10.59%
4.71%
53.90%
5.84%
72.08%
18.51%
9.42%
82.53%
11.45%
6.02%
29.10%
6.10%
45.30%
8.20%
11.30%
81.60%
14.10%
4.30%
Source: 2000 Census and Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey (KCRHTS), weighted. As documented
in the Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, the data were weighted by household size,
household vehicles, and geography (home location). Round 1 participants are summarized using raw KCRHTS data
as the EPA surveys didn't obtain demographic information.
The 2000 Census Transportation Planning Package Profile for the seven-county
metropolitan region was used to review the worker flow characteristics. As shown in Figure 3-2,
the commute trip characteristics of the participating MARC household members on the assigned
travel day tracks those reflected in the census fairly well. In terms of gender, the MARC survey
contains a slightly higher proportion of female workers compared to male workers, but still
within 5% of the census. The Round 1 participants tend to have more men then women while in
Round 2, participants were more likely to be women.
3-13
-------
fin n% T EE «<"
en no/.
4u.U%
on no/.
on no/.
1 n no/.
Ono/,
53.6%
48.4%
47.3% 47.3%
51.6%
44. 1°/
52.7%
Male Female
DCTPP
• MARC
D Round 1
D Round 2
Figure 3-2. Worker Comparison
As in the journey to work data, the majority of employed respondents in the MARC
survey reported driving or riding as an auto passenger to work (91%) on the assigned travel day.
The proportion of MARC workers telecommuting was higher than what was reported in the
census (6% compared to 3%), while the proportion of workers who commuted by walk or bike
was relatively the same. "Other" responses included taxi and paratransit modes (e.g., alternative
mode of flexible passenger transportation that does not follow fixed routes or schedules such as
minibuses and vans).
Round 1 and Round 2 participants virtually all drove to work. The difference was
expected, given the requirements of vehicle ownership and the need to drive a vehicle to the
testing facility in the morning hours. Table 3-12 shows the mode to work comparison for the
four datasets.
Table 3-12. Mode to Work Comparison
Mode
Auto
Transit
Bike/Walk
Other
Work at Home
CTPP
93.7%
1.3%
1.3%
0.6%
3.2%
MARC
91.1%
1.3%
1.4%
0.3%
5.9%
ROUND 1
99.6%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
ROUND 2
99.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
Source: 2000 Census and Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey (KCRHTS), weighted. As documented
in the Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Final Report, the data were weighted by household size,
household vehicles, and geography (home location). Round 1 participants are summarized using raw KCRHTS data
as the EPA study recruitment surveys did not obtain demographic information.
The MARC survey respondents reported the same work commute time as what was
captured in the census journey to work data (24 minutes for the survey and 23 minutes for the
3-14
-------
census). Figure 3-3 shows the travel time comparison for the four datasets. The largest
noticeable difference between the two data sources is in the 20 to 29 minute commutes, where
the census shows 26% of all trips taking this long, while in the survey data, only 20% were of
that length. This difference is somewhat attributable to the way the census question was worded
(how many minutes did it usually take this person to get to work last week) compared to how the
work trip travel time was computed (time it took to leave home and arrive at work on a specific
travel day, with the trip start and end times being reported by the respondent).
30.0% n
25.0% -
20.0% -
15.0% -
10.0% -
5.0% -
0.0%
< 5 min 5-9 min 10-14 15-19 20-29 30-44 45
min min min min min+
Figure 3-3. Travel Time Comparison
The Round 1 participants had shorter commutes, on average (22.5 minutes compared to
23.7 minutes overall). They reported considerably fewer commute trips of 20 to 29 minutes in
particular. Round 2 participants also had shorter commutes with considerably more reported,
however, in the 15 to 19 minute range than any of the other three datasets.
In general, with regard to both demographic and the journey to work information reported
by the participating households, the Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey is
representative of the study area population. The Round 1 and Round 2 participants represent the
vehicle-owning households in the region, and also reflect the testing goals. They are slightly
larger in size, tend towards middle income, and are slightly younger. Round 1 participants are
likely to be male, while Round 2 are more likely to be female.
Figure 3-4 illustrates the sample flow in deriving the 2,887 households for the emissions
study from the MARC Kansas City Household Travel Study Sample. Figure 3-5 illustrates the
sample flow in deriving the 4,081 households from the Vehicle Registration Database.
3-15
-------
Figure 3-4. Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey Sample Flow
Summary
STEPl: Sample Selection
7-County Study Area was divided into 3 density-based strata.
40,649 Sample Pieces (Telephone Numbers) randomly drawn across all three strata,
proportionate to population.
STEP 2: Household Recruitment Stage.
The 40,649 pieces of sample were dialed. As households were contacted, they were
offered the opportunity to participate in the study. Sample was classified into one of
three categories based on the call outcome.
INELIGIBLE SAMPLE
N =17593
(business, government,
disconnected, outside study
area, etc.)
ELIGIBLE SAMPLE
N = 5504
4,001 recruited for studj
1.503 refused the study.)
ELIGIBILITY UNKNOWN
N =17552
(unable to be classified as
eligible or ineligible after 8+
attempts)
STEP 3: Household Travel/Retrieval Stage.
The 4001 recruited households were assigned a 24-hour day to track their travel.
Within one week after travel, their data were retrieved.
SUCCESSFULLY
COMPLETE SURVEY
N = 3,049
Complete all tasks.
SAMPLED FOR KC
EPA STUDY
N = 2,887
All households with at least
one vehicle
DO NOT COMPLETE
Do not complete all tasks
3-16
-------
Figure 3-5. KS and MO Vehicle Registration Database Sample Flow Summary
STEPl: Sample Selection
8,168 vehicles were sampled from 2003 Missouri and Kansas vehicle registration data
files, screened by location and vehicle bin. Only vehicle bins 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 were
used.
STEP 2: Sample Match
The vehicle registration data did not include telephone data; only address fields. The
8,168 vehicle records were provided to Telematch to associate a possible phone
number to each vehicle.
MATCHED SAMPLE
N = 4,018
UNMATCHED SAMPLE
N = 4,151
COMPRESSED
SAMPLE
N = 3,953
COMPRESSED
SAMPLE
N = 128
Duplicates removed
Lexis/Nexis research
FINAL SAMPLE
All households with at least
3-17
-------
3.5 Vehicle Recruitment Sample Plan
This section documents the sample plan and stratification scheme derived for the study. It
is presented in two sections. First, the original sample plan derived for Round 1 is introduced.
Second, a final sample plan designed for Round 2 using Round 1 data is presented.
Original Round 1 Sample Plan
The RFP initially proposed a stratification scheme and a sample allocation based on
optimal allocation for obtaining the desired total of 480 tested vehicles across Rounds 1 and 2.
After reviewing the back-up materials, the project team agreed that the data used to design the
sample were subject to substantial uncertainty and that the project would benefit from re-visiting
the sample design using a larger data set. Accordingly, EPA and ERG provided PM emissions
data and DMV registration data for the development of an enhanced sample design. A summary
of the source of the PM data provided by EPA is shown in Table 3-13.
Table 3-13. Summary of Data Used for Development of Sample Sizes for the KC
Study
Study Number
CRC E-54
CRCE-24-1
CRC E-24-2
Grand Total
Study Description
Central Carolina Vehicle Participate
Emission Study
Cadle, S.H. et al (September 1999)
"Light-Duty Motor Vehicle
Partioculate Matter Measurement in
the Denver, Colorado Area, J. Air
Waste Manage. Assoc. 49 PM- 164- 174
Measurement of Primary Particulate
Matter Emissions from Light-duty
Motor Vehicles (Norbeck, et al.)
Number of IM240 Tests
CAR
158
56
212
426
TRUCK
77
17
110
204
Total Tests
235
73
322
630
The project team endorsed the recommendation to employ the MARC ROD data set as a
source of vehicles. This was significant because the substantial pool of vehicles that is
immediately available from the MARC sample involves virtually no screening effort. Therefore,
the stratified sample design strategy called Neymann allocation (which ignores screening costs
across vehicle class/age strata) was an appropriate starting point for designing an optimal
allocation sample design.
The sample design addressed two issues:
• Determination of attractive vehicle age cutpoints to form strata; and
• Development of optimal allocation of sample sizes to individual strata.
Developing Vehicle Age Cutpoints
3-18
-------
Eight strata for sampling vehicles are to be formed by crossing vehicle type (truck vs.
car) by Vehicle Year Made (4 age groupings). There is flexibility in designating the cutpoints of
the three oldest vehicle ages. The task was to use available PM data to determine appropriate
cutpoints. Our approach employs a sequential strategy - first determine the best cutpoint for the
oldest vehicle year make category, then address the newer age groupings.
Tables 3-14 and 3-15 present four scenarios for specifying the oldest age groupings. See
the "Pre X" and "(X+l) to 1989" rows. We varied the cutpoint for the "Pre X" stratum using
1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 (see column headings). In an ideal world we want a cutpoint to
maximize "between" stratum variance yet minimize "within" stratum variance. This means we
want to see divergent Mean Values across strata coupled with less divergent standard deviations
across strata. Tables 3-14 and 3-15 show that the ideal world clearly does not exist, but that
strata means diverge most (for cars) when X=1981 (i.e., using "Pre-1981" as the oldest make
category). This was our recommendation.
Table 3-14. Mean PMs for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative Cutpoints for the
Oldest Vehicles
Sampling Vehicles
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
PreX
(X+l) to 1989
1990 to 1995
1 996 & newer
PreX
(X+l) to 1989
1990 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
X=1980
Mean PM 1
40.46
18.30
6.55
5.28
39.68
17.01
5.90
3.12
X=1981
Mean PM 2
40.46
18.30
6.55
5.28
39.12
14.85
5.90
3.12
X=1982
Mean PM 3
37.07
18.88
6.55
5.28
36.86
14.31
5.90
3.12
X=1983
Mean PM 4
36.51
18.67
6.55
5.28
34.27
13.62
5.89
3.12
Table 3-15. Standard Deviations of PMs for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative
Cutpoints for the Oldest Vehicles
Sampling Vehicles
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
PreX
(X+l) to 1989
1990 to 1995
1 996 & newer
PreX
(X+l) to 1989
1990 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
X=1980
Stdev PM 1
39.34
20.50
6.89
5.09
28.63
23.67
7.47
3.49
X=1981
Stdev PM 2
39.35
20.50
6.89
5.09
31.54
20.64
7.47
3.49
X=1982
Stdev PM 3
38.47
20.93
6.89
5.09
31.56
19.94
7.47
3.49
X=1983
Stdev PM 4
37.53
21.21
6.89
5.09
29.97
20.16
7.47
3.49
Using the recommendation above, we then examined four alternative cutpoints for the
middle vehicle age strata. Tables 3-16 and 3-17 present the results of this analysis. We see in
3-19
-------
Table 3-15 that a significant reduction in PM variation for stratum 3 occurs when using 1990 as
the cutpoint to divide the range 1981-1995 into two strata. Thus, we recommended that age
categories 1981-1990 and 1991-1995 be adopted.
Table 3-16. Mean PMs for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative Outpoints for the
Middle-Aged Vehicles
Means by strata
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
Pre-1981
1981 to Z
(Z+l)to 1995
1 996 & newer
Pre-1981
1981 to Z
(Z+l)to 1995
1 996 & newer
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Z=1989
Mean PM 1
40.46
18.30
6.55
5.28
39.12
14.85
5.90
3.12
Z=1990
Mean PM 2
40.46
17.53
4.57
5.28
39.12
14.40
5.43
3.12
Z=1991
Mean PM 3
40.46
16.09
4.86
5.28
39.12
13.73
5.09
3.12
Z=1992
Mean PM 4
40.46
15.56
5.08
5.28
39.12
12.70
5.12
3.12
Table 3-17. PM Standard Deviations for Eight Strata Under Four Alternative
Outpoints for the Middle-Aged Vehicles
Sampling Vehicles
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
Pre-1981
1981 to Z
(Z+l)to 1995
1 996 & newer
Pre-1981
1981 to Z
(Z+l)to 1995
1 996 & newer
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Z=1989
Stdev PM 1
39.34
20.50
6.89
4.36*
31.54
20.64
7.47
4.36*
Z=1990
Stdev PM 2
39.35
19.07
3.95
4.36*
31.54
19.96
7.15
4.36*
Z=1991
Stdev PM 3
39.35
18.60
4.20
4.36*
31.54
19.32
6.52
4.36*
Z=1992
Stdev PM 4
39.35
18.42
4.31
4.36*
31.54
18.48
6.65
4.36*
The data supported our recommendation to employ the following year of make categories
for stratification purposes: Pre-1981; 1981-1990; 1991-1995 and 1996+. We used this in the
development of an optimal design, as described in the following section.
Optimal Allocation using PM Emission Rate
We used the PM emission rate data to assess the optimal allocation of test vehicles across
the eight sampling strata recommended above. Table 3-18 presents the results of this design
exercise. Column A exhibits the standard deviation of PM emission rate for each stratum. The
relative values across strata are used to establish differential sampling rates, shown as "Neymann
relative f' in Column B. Column C is not used in the optimal allocation design, but shows how
vehicles in the Kansas City area distribute naturally (proportionately) across strata. (Here we
used the MARC RDD percentage distribution of vehicles across strata because we verified that
3-20
-------
this was consistent with the distributions of vehicles obtained from DMV records in the counties
comprising the Kansas City MSA.)
Table 3-18. Neymann (Optimal) Allocation Using PM per Vehicle-Mile
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model
Year
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
§ S
•55 Q
S" -n
^^ 03
dn 05
39.35
19.07
3.95
4.36
31.54
19.96
7.15
4.36
B
+J
a
fi W3
C 4» a
" ^ ™3
a ••§ ft
S
1.1%
3.7%
7.2%
28.6%
1.3%
7.4%
13.4%
37.3%
100%
D
^
o
_o
___
o.
0
6.1%
9.9%
4.0%
17.5%
5.7%
20.7%
13.4%
22.8%
100%
E
-------
Optimal Allocation using Annual PM Emissions
Table 3-19 develops an optimal allocation design based on annual volume of PM
emissions. Column A exhibits the average mileage driven by vehicles per stratum, and Column
AA presents the stratum specific standard deviations formed by taking the product of PM
emission standard deviation and the average annual vehicle mileage. The resulting relative
sampling rates under Neymann allocation appear in Column B, and the resulting percentage
allocations of sample to strata appear in Column D. The optimal allocation distribution can be
contrasted with a proportionate allocation design by comparing the row entries of Columns C
(for a proportionate design) to the corresponding cell in Column D (under the optimal allocation
design). The optimal allocation of tests to strata under a design totaling N=480 is presented in
Column E. We see that the optimal design using Annual PM emissions does not differ much
from a proportionate design. This is primarily a function of the low prevalence of older, higher
emitting vehicles in the active fleet.
As a parting note to this section, the optimal allocation derivation relies on a statistical
estimation methodology that incorporates external auxiliary information - i.e., annual vehicle
mileage. As such, the optimal allocation derivation is conditional on the average mileage data
(in a formal mathematical statistical sense). The conditional approach is invoked in Column AA
by using:
Std dev(annual emissions) = Ave mileage x Std dev(PM rate).
That is, we assume that the estimate of annual PM emissions will be developed using
average mileage data obtained from a source outside this study (rather than taking a
measurement for each vehicle being tested). If actual vehicle mileage of each tested vehicle is to
be used in the annual PM estimation process, then an additional source of variation (i.e.,
sampling error from annual mileage) will have to be taken into account. (Also, the estimation
process will need to be explicitly specified.) However, this was not recommended because the
resulting estimates are subject to very large sampling errors.
3-22
-------
Table 3-19. Neymann (Optimal) Allocation Using Annual PM Emissions
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
•a
4*
•^
e
K
S
w
S 4>
PH Q
39.35
19.07
3.95
4.36
31.54
19.96
7.15
4.36
A'
^
w
la
*•*"
s
= oi)
4> 4*
r* S
C 4i
< Q
88,925
90,991
35,685
68,182
123,490
114,766
59,798
53599
AA = A x A'
B
dj
* R
= 0/J
= _=
S ft
« es
Z i»
2.49
2.55
1.00
1.91
3.46
3.22
1.68
1.50
Totals
C
u
PH
^
^?
O/j
s
^
O)
•Jo
4* M
> s
1.1%
3.7%
7.2%
28.6%
1.3%
7.4%
13.4%
37.3%
100%
D
w
_o
•<
>p_
a
O
1.5%
5.2%
4.0%
30.2%
2.5%
13.2%
12.4%
31.0%
100%
E
»^r
—
"a
S
O5
___
a
O
7
25
19
145
12
63
60
149
480
F
O/j
s
W5
—
IS
4>
•iu
^ —
O">
5-23
-------
Proportionate Allocation using Annual PM Emissions.
An alternative design is one that allocates sample to strata proportionately to the
percentage contribution of PM emissions from the collection of vehicles in each stratum. Table
3-20 presents this design.
Table 3-20. Sample Allocation for Proportionate Design Based on Annual
Percentage PM Emissions Across Strata
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model
Year
Pre-1981
1981-
1990
1991-
1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-
1990
1991-
1995
1996+
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
OK
i
s
a
a
OJ)
2,260
4,771
9,034
15624
3,915
5,750
8,363
12282
B
V)
'a
0.
OK
40.46
17.53
4.57
5.28
39.12
14.4
5.43
3.12
C*
Mean Annual PM
Volume Per Vehicle
91434
83643
41286
82494
153168
82797
45413
38321
*C = AxB
D
S/j
s
5 Q
^ °
73 u
1.1%
3.7%
7.2%
28.6%
1.3%
7.4%
13.4%
37.3%
100%
E
-^
o
H
£ .
'-B -22
Jw
vo S
o^ CH
1.7%
5.2%
5.0%
39.9%
3.4%
10.4%
10.3%
24.2%
100%
F
Annual Volume PM
Propor N
8
25
24
192
16
50
49
116
480
G
Avail Vehicles
Using MARC
71
295
514
2048
84
571
982
2636
7201
H
o
0 "S,
'i« s
8.7
11.7
21.3
10.7
5.2
11.5
19.9
22.7
Column A of Table 3-20 presents the average annual mileage of vehicles in a given
stratum (defined by the rows). Column B shows the average PM emission rate for vehicles in
each stratum. The mean annual PM emissions per vehicle in each stratum is furnished in Column
C by taking the product of corresponding cell values in Columns A and B.
Column E reflects the stratum percentage contribution to total PM emissions. It is
calculated using the product of the mean annual PM volume per vehicle (Col. C) and the
percentage of vehicles associated with each stratum (Col. D). For instance pre-1981 cars (stratum
5) represent 1.3% of vehicles in Kansas City, but account for 3.4% of annual vehicle emissions.
A proportionate allocation of sample to strata based on total annual vehicle emissions is
presented in Column F.
3-24
-------
Optimal Allocation Using Annual PM Emissions
Table 3-21 provides the analogue to Table 3-20 but using the percentage distribution of
annual emissions (Column E) rather than the percentage distribution of vehicles (as shown in
Table 3-19, Column C).
Table 3-21. Optimal Allocation Design Based on Annual Percentage PM
Emissions Across Strata
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model
Year
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
Q
•o
%
3
0.
39.35
19.07
3.95
4.36
31.54
19.96
7.15
4.36
B
S/j
«
'a
s
a
a
>
<
2,260
4,771
9,034
15624
3,915
5,750
8,363
12,282
C
•o
-*j
s
V)
'a
Q-
"sS
3
g £
< 0
88,925
90,991
35,685
68,182
123,490
114,766
59,798
53,599
D
Relative
Rates
s o/j
s s
« —
t> §
Z B3
2.49
2.55
1.00
1.91
3.46
3.22
1.68
1.50
Totals
E
suted to
Emission
..— ' '
§ PH
^^ C^
iN °
Ov -4^
1.7%
5.2%
5.0%
39.9%
3.4%
10.4%
10.3%
24.2%
100%
F
^
Jlocation
•«q
«
S
o.
O
2.1%
6.8%
2.5%
38.6%
5.9%
16.9%
8.7%
18.4%
100%
G
Z
—
"a,
es
O5
«
S
a
O
10
32
12
185
28
81
42
88
480
H
U
05
a>
1
*
^
71
295
514
2,048
84
571
982
2,636
7,201
I
z
o
-4^
—
2
—
>•
o
-^
Qi
6.9
9.1
42.0
11.0
3.0
7.0
23.4
29.9
Allocation Using an Ad Hoc Weighting Strategy.
The optimal allocations above were designed to maximize the statistical precision of a
specific estimate (e.g., annual PM emissions). However, a competing research objective is to
account for the rare but higher emitting vehicles making up the older fleet. As an ad hoc way of
addressing this issue, we adjusted the optimization parameters that appear in Table 3-21 by
including average PM emission rate. Table 3-22 presents the results of this approach. This
design shows substantial increased allocations to the pre-1981 strata, so much so that there may
not be sufficient vehicles available from the MARC sample to achieve the targets.
Comparison of Designs.
Table 3-23 presents a comparison of designs presented above. The designs were derived
from optimizing PM emission rates, optimizing annual PM emissions using vehicle distributions,
and optimizing annual PM emissions using PM emission distributions, and appear as Columns
A, B and D, respectively. Column C shows the allocation under the proportionate design —
proportionate to annual PM emissions.
3-25
-------
Table 3-22. An Ad Hoc Weighting Strategy
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model
Year
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
Q
•o
0.
39.35
19.07
3.95
4.36
31.54
19.96
7.15
4.36
A'
qj
I?
3
a
QJ
^
2,260
4,771
9,034
15624
3,915
5,750
8,363
12282
A"
u
'a
§
S/j
•^
40.46
17.53
4.57
5.28
39.12
14.4
5.43
3.12
AA
o
o
to
S/j
_c
£
w
o
o
ffi
•o
3,597,921
1,595,077
163,081
359,999
4,830,914
1,652,624
324,702
167,229
AA=AxA'xA"
B
tf
_c
"a,
S
CS
f*3
a>
-4^
—
«
22.06
9.78
1.00
2.21
29.62
10.13
1.99
1.03
Totals
C
^
Q
Q
Qi
U
05
^H
^
1.1%
3.7%
7.2%
28.6%
1.3%
7.4%
13.4%
37.3%
100%
D
o
_o
^
5
7.8%
11.7%
2.3%
20.4%
12.5%
24.3%
8.6%
12.4%
100%
E
Z
0)
"a,
1
vi
o
ffi
•o
•<3
38
56
11
98
60
116
41
59
480
F
U
Qi
2
—
es
"e3
>•
71
295
514
2,048
84
571
982
2,636
7201
G
Z
o
_0j
'«
o
«
1.9
5.3
46.0
20.9
1.4
4.9
23.7
44.4
5-26
-------
Table 3-23. Optimal Designs, a Proportionate Design, and Two Alternatives
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model
Year
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
•_
55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
TABLE 3-18.
Opt Alloc
PM Emission Rate
29
47
19
84
28
99
64
109
B
TABLE 3-19
Opt Alloc PM
Annual Volume
& Vehicle Percent
7
25
19
145
12
63
60
149
480
C
TABLE 3-20
Annual Volume
PMPropor N
8
25
24
192
16
50
49
116
480
D
TABLE 3-21.
Opt Alloc PM
Annual Volume
& Percent Distn
10
32
12
185
28
81
42
88
480
E
TABLE 3-22
Ad Hoc Design
38
56
11
98
60
116
41
59
F
(New) Alternative Design
30
50
50
75
30
100
65
80
480
G
Available Vehicles
71
295
514
2,048
84
571
982
2,636
7,201
480
5-27
-------
The optimization of the average PM emission rate (Column A) presents the largest
oversampling of early-make vehicles (see rows 1-2, and 5-6). Optimizing annual emissions
(Columns B and D) tends to only slightly oversample vehicles relative to a design (Column C)
that proportionately allocates sample based on annual PM emissions for all vehicles in a stratum.
It is not the case that a proportionate design based on annual PM emissions calls for large
samples from early-make vehicle strata. In fact, the proportionate design calls for samples of
only 8 Pre-1981 trucks and 16 Pre-1981 cars.
Column E presents the Ad Hoc design that weights the allocation of sample to strata by
all three factors - PM rate, PM emissions and mileage. Finally, for the purposes of discussion,
we have added Column F, a new "alternative design." Column F was formed by establishing a
minimum target representation of N=30 tests. The minimum would be invoked for three strata:
(stratum 1) Pre-1981 trucks; (stratum 3) 1991-1995 trucks; and (stratum 5) Pre-1981 cars. To
compensate for the increase in sample size in these strata, the sample sizes of the two largest
strata (1996+ trucks and cars) were drawn down roughly proportionately.
Final Sample and Stratification
After considering the various designs, we recommended our Alternative Design (Column
F, Table 3-23) for Round 1 of the study. We believed this to be a robust design because it
offered protection against surprises in the data (e.g., higher than expected variability in the older
fleet, and higher than expected variability in 1991-1995 trucks), yet aligns fairly closely with the
original optimal allocation strategy to estimate mean PM rates.
In preparing the Round 2 sample design, the ultimate performance of the sample plan was
analyzed. These considerations are discussed in full in the next section.
Final Round 2 Sample Plan
With Round 1 completed, the PM data from those tests were used to revisit the sample
design for Round 2. The objective of this effort was to develop a more optimal sample for
Round 2 given actual PM data from KS vehicles. Such an approach optimizes the estimate of
overall (annualized) OM emissions by the KC vehicle fleet. However, the design must also take
into account a competing research goal - that of measuring PM emissions in warm (summer) and
cold (winter) temperature environments. This section documents the process used to develop the
Round 2 sample design.
PM Distributions from Round 1 Testing
Using results from Round 1 tested vehicles, PM distribution of the overall sample was
examined. It appears as Chart 1. The distribution of PMs was highly skewed: median PM is
3.10 mg/mile, the mean is 11.85, and the PM range is 0.09 to 287.15 mg/mile- large by any
standard. Moreover, the 90th percentile value is about 25.7 mg/mile. In fact, the mean value lies
near the 85th percentile.
3-28
-------
Q. 0.8
E
ra
vt °-6
£ 0.4
o
• Total Sample
PMs(mg/mile)
Chart 1. Distribution of Total PMs for Round 1 tested Vehicles for the Total
Sample
Chart 2 presents the spread of PMs by Stratum (Bin). One can see the monotonic
increase in dispersion of PMs as you go from newer vehicles to older vehicles. (1 to 4 for trucks
and 5 to 9 for cars) It is also clear that the distributions of PM vary substantially across strata. It
is important to note that when the goal is to develop a good statistical estimate of the PM
emissions for the KC fleet, the level of emissions within each stratum is not as important as the
standard deviation of PM distributions within strata.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
PMs (mg/mile)
Chart 2. Comparative Distributions of Round 1 Tested Vehicle PMs by Strata/Bin
Another aspect of PM production is observed in older vehicles. Older vehicles tend to be
driven less than newer ones, and this serves to dampen the older vehicle contribution to total
annual vehicle PM emissions in the KC vehicle fleet. The lower use of older vehicles is
illustrated in Chart 3. On average, older vehicles are driven far fewer miles annually than newer
vehicles. For this initial evaluation model year average miles driven data from the MOBILE6
was used.
3-29
-------
a, 20,000
Chart 3. Average Annual Mileage Per Vehicle by Stratum
Chart 4 compares the percentage distributions across strata for three measures:
• annual PM volume,
• vehicles in the KC fleet, and
• total miles driven by KC fleet vehicles.
% of Annual PM Volume
% of Vehicles in Fleet
% of Total Miles Driven
0.0%
Chart 4. Percentages of Annual PM Volume, Vehicles in Fleet and Total Miles
Driven Relative to Total by Stratum
The oldest vehicles not only comprise the smallest portion of the fleet, but they also
account for a small fraction of all vehicle miles driven. For instance, roughly 80% of annual
vehicle miles are driven by 1996+ cars and trucks, while under 1% of total vehicle miles are
driven by Pre-1981 cars and trucks combined. Similarly, Pre-1981 cars and trucks account for
about 7% of total annual PM volume, while 1996+ vehicles account for roughly 45% of PM
volume. Even if the emissions rates of older vehicles are very high, their low usage in terms of
vehicle-miles relative to the rest of the fleet results in a relatively small percentage contribution
total PMs.
3-30
-------
Revised Optimal Allocation Using the Round 1 PM Emissions Rate
The PM emission rate data from Round 1 vehicle testing to assess the optimal allocation
of test vehicles across the eight sampling strata that cross-classify vehicle type (truck vs. car) and
year of make (Pre-1981, 1981-1990, 1991-1995; 1996+). Table 3-24 presents the results of this
design exercise and compares this to the original optimal sample design and the hybrid design
currently being used. Column A exhibits the standard deviation of PM emission rate for each
stratum based on actual Round 1 vehicle testing. (The standard deviation measures the
variability of PM emission rates within a stratum.) Column B presents the standard deviation of
annualized PM emissions using the revised PM emissions data from Round 1 testing and EPA
data on annual usage (available previously).
Table 3-24. Using Round 1 Annualized PM Volume to Compare Original &
Revised Optimal Allocations with the Current Sample Design
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
0.
Q
W >
Vl u
£«
w ~s
& £
44.76
39.35
8.20
4.23
89.23
21.47
8.17
2.64
B
13 Q
3 ™-«
s 3
C VI
§K
H*H flj
vi a
fe" S
> .5
W "o
05 >
101148
187734
74097
66123
349380
123453
68291
32442
Totals
C
"sS
.1
O.
0
-J
< z
Z ^
& e
w s
8
50
38
135
32
65
65
86
480
E
Ml
-------
More striking is the similarity of the revised optimal allocation design (Col. D) and our
Current Design (Col. E). This is illustrated in Column F, showing the difference between the
revised optimal design and our current design (F = D-E) for each stratum. Half of the strata (i.e.,
Strata 2, 5, 7, 8) are within a few tests of the actual "optimal". The largest discrepancies are with
Pre-1981 trucks (which was explicitly planned to be an oversample), 1996+ trucks, and 1981-
1990 cars.
The suggested reduction of sample size from Pre-1981 cars is consistent with the original
optimal allocation. The low prevalence of these vehicles in the population does not warrant the
oversampling of this stratum for the purpose of estimating overall PM emissions from the KC
fleet. Relative to the smaller optimal sample size of 1996+ cars (n=86), the larger optimal sample
size of 1996+ trucks (n=145) is easy to understand. There is 60% higher variation in PM
standard deviation of 1996+ trucks (relative to 1996+ cars, i.e., 4.23/2.64 = 1.60) because they
include large gas-guzzlers (e.g., heavy duty pick-ups) as well as smaller more fuel efficient
trucks (e.g., compact pick-ups and car-based SUVs). This represents a wide variation in vehicle
emitting capacity (much wider than what exists for newer cars). All such trucks enjoy
popularity and this wide variation needs to be picked up in the sample, meaning a larger sample
of tests from 1996+ trucks. Having said this, we recognize and need to adapt our final design to
reflect the fact that some newer, larger trucks cannot be tested with present equipment. This
should be taken into account when setting the final sample sizes.
Other issues that need to be taken into account and would draw the design away from a
strict optimal allocation design are the need to test cars and trucks more heavily in the middle
strata that feature vehicles built between 1981-1995. Finally, there is the goal of measuring cold
temperature vehicle emissions. The final design must balance these competing needs and
objectives.
Final Sample Design
Table 3-25 presents final design, along with its impact on Round 2 recruiting given
Round 1 performance. Column A shows the current design, Column B presents the revised
optimal design (based on Round 1 PM tests), and Column F exhibits the final design (which was
the result of extensive dialogue with EPA and stakeholders reviewing the material in this memo
and other research data).
3-32
-------
Table 3-25. Sample Allocation for Three Designs and Impact of Final Design on
Round 2 Testing
Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A
W>
O
-------
Table 3-26. Vehicle Recruitment Goals for Round 1
CLASS
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Year
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Goal
30
50
50
75
30
100
65
80
480
Scheduled
4
26
24
59
7
63
52
106
341
•o
(/3
H
•o
e
3
o
2
21
18
39
6
49
39
87
261
,
c3
o
O
o
•o
H
7%
38%
36%
49%
20%
50%
58%
106%
53%
O
•o
e
a
o
16
26
26
39
16
51
34
42
250
•o
e
g
o
tf
o
•o
gj .2
•*"> 53
(U °
H O
13%
73%
69%
95%
38%
98%
112%
202%
102%
The sample flow can be viewed in two perspectives: household sample flow and vehicle
recruitment sample flow. The household sample flow during the recruitment process is
illustrated in Figure 3-6. A total of 341 vehicles were recruited and scheduled for testing during
Round 1. Seventy-six percent (76%) of those were tested (261). Some vehicles were not tested
(20 vehicles did not qualify for dynamometer testing; 16 of those participated in PEMS testing
only). Because not all cars scheduled were tested, progress in meeting the Round 1 goals can
best be measured in viewing the "Tested % of Round 1" column. Two classes of vehicles, Class
7 and Class 8, met 100% of their Round 1 goals. Class 4 and class 6 were slightly below their
Round 1 goal. The remaining classes were under tested due to eligibility and sampling
constraints.
3-34
-------
Sample Flow Summary
STEPl: Sample Selection
All MARC Households with at least one vehicle were flagged and
identified as potential sources of test vehicles. (N=2,887)
STEP 2: Household Recruitment Stage.
A total of 1,236 pieces of sample were dialed. Of those, 106 were no
longer valid. As households were contacted, they were offered the
opportunity to participate in the study.
CONVERTED INTO
PARTICIPANTS
N = 52
STEP 3: Vehicles are Tested.
N=221 Households
Figure 3-6. Household Sample Flow Summary
3-35
-------
One of the challenges of Round 1 testing was that there were fewer than expected older
vehicles available for recruitment. In fact, by the end of Round 1 testing, our available vehicle
pool for recruiting the oldest vehicles, i.e., Strata 1, 2, 5, 6 (Pre-1981 and 1981-1990 trucks and
cars) had been virtually exhausted. The impact of this is observed in the total percentages that
were tested for Classes 1, 2, 5, and 6 (13%, 73%, 38% and 98%, respectively) in Table 3-26. The
sample flow for vehicle recruitment is summarized in Table 3-27.
Table 3-27. Vehicle Recruitment Sample Flow by Class, Round 1
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Year
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1 996 & newer
o.
H
^s
•o
o
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Total
__
o
O
"5
QJ
'Q^
•
0.
30
50
50
75
30
100
65
80
480
•o
•o
JS
Vl
•o
e
a
o
4
26
24
59
7
63
52
106
341
•o
£
<2
H
V)
—
"o
jS
•o
e
a
o
2
21
18
39
6
49
39
87
261
X
es
O
•o
s
a
o
16
26
26
39
16
51
34
42
250
^
-Q
•o
o
e
o
U
T"> 4>
-= 0
> dH
73
268
178
487
90
561
311
669
2637
•o
•o
o>
JS
VI
•S a3
W M
c «
es -2"
—" >P«
ctf
to dn
23
94
43
151
38
175
82
177
783
o
e
> "5
— ^
5 S3
to U
24
90
59
123
26
192
91
208
813
3.7 Round 2 Recruitment - Goals and Recruitment Statistics
This section reviews the Round 2 vehicle recruitment goals and documents efforts in
meeting these goals. Table 3-28 details the overall study recruitment goals and Round 2 goals by
Vehicle year, type (truck or car) and demonstrates the progress made in reaching those goals.
3-36
-------
Table 3-28. Vehicle Recruitment Goals For Round 2
Strata
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Year
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Btype
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
o
O
-4^
O
0>
o°
0.
30
50
50
75
30
100
65
80
480
•o
•o
js
o
VI
•o
a
s
o
&
13
61
53
82
19
52
49
41
370
•o
V)
H
•o
e
s
o
&
9
29
31
50
14
36
37
29
235
o
O
o
•o
to
H
30%
58%
62%
67%
47%
36%
57%
36%
49%
X
o
O
•o
e
s
o
&
10
37
30
47
15
34
36
27
236
o
O
•o
j3
S
O
&
O
•o
to
-------
STEP 1: Sample Selection
All MARC Households with at least one vehicle and Vehicle Registration
Households were flagged and identified as potential sources of test vehicles.
(N=7,375)
STEP 2: Household Recruitment Stage.
A total of 4,986 pieces of sample were dialed. 813 were no longer valid
numbers. As households were contacted, they were offered the
opportunity to participate in the study.
STEP 3: Vehicles are Tested.
N=203 Households
Figure 3-7. Sample Flow Summary for Round 2
3-38
-------
Table 3-29. Round 2 Vehicle Recruitment Sample Flow by Class
Class
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Year
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1 996 & newer
Pre-1981
1981 to 1990
1991 to 1995
1996 & newer
4*
a
H1
^^
•o
o
CQ
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
o
w
4*
p
0-
30
50
50
75
30
100
65
80
480
•a
— i*
s
•o
a>
JS
-a
53
S
O
rt
13
61
53
82
19
52
49
41
370
•a
4>
H
•a
53
S
O
<£
9
29
31
50
14
36
37
29
235
S
o
O
•a
53
S
O
rt
10
37
30
47
15
34
36
27
236
•a
•^
w
•2
=
o
U
W5
—
> «
S §
S a-
3
z ^
479
986
796
1232
767
910
543
1121
6834
•Q
dJ
J
^
»
."S -2
t>. ^"
•M *PH
« -M
^b ^^
153
424
200
358
307
274
131
312
2159
•a
w
w
=
o
U
o
Z
•J
>
^M
«
fi
t
65
149
395
558
75
269
219
504
2234
3.8 Tested Vehicles
3.8.1 Round 1
Round 1 Vehicle testing targets and actual vehicles dynamometer tested are shown in
Table 3-30. Although the total number of vehicles dynamometer tested conducted exceeded
project goals, several strata targets were not achieved (most notable in bins 1 and 5). The
MARC vehicle database was solely used for vehicle recruitment (via random digit dialing, or
RDD) for Round 1 recruiting. This database was supplemented with the Kansas City registration
database after Round 1 to help recover these shortfalls during Round 2 recruiting.
3-39
-------
Table 3-30. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 1
Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vehicle Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year Group
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Total
Round 1 Goal
16
26
26
39
16
51
34
42
250
Round 1 Tested
2
21
18
39
6
49
39
87
261
% of Goal
13%
81%
69%
100%
38%
96%
115%
207%
104%
Table 3-31 lists the various tests conducted during Round 1, in comparison with project
goals. PEMS testing on conditioning runs was performed on all vehicles, regardless of
dynamometer eligibility.
Table 3-31. Round 1 Tests Conducted
Test Type
PEMS Conditioning Test
Replicate PEMS Conditioning Test
PEMS Driveaway Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test Replicate
Dynamometer/PEMS Control Vehicle Test
Round 1 Goal
All
1 per week
N/A
250
1 per week
1 per week
Round 1 Tested
284
17
13
261
15
12
3.8.2 Round 2
In order to better achieve strata-specific test targets during Round 2 testing, the MARC
database used for Round 1 recruiting was supplemented with the KC registration database for
Round 2 recruiting of Bins, 1, 2, 5, and 6. As can be seen in Table 3-32, this significantly
improved recruiting efforts.
Table 3-32. Number of Vehicles Dynamometer Tested During Round 2 (excluding
Round 1 Retest Vehicles)
Bin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vehicle Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year Group
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Total
Round 2 Goal
10
37
30
47
15
34
36
27
236
Round 2 Tested
9
29
31
50
14
36
37
29
235
% of Goal
90
78
103
106
93
106
103
107
100
3-40
-------
Despite addition of the KC registration database, recruitment and testing of "older"
vehicles (Bins 1, 2, 4, and 5) was challenging for several reasons:
• Overall, fewer older vehicles were available in the MARC and registration
databases (relative to newer vehicles).
• A large percentage of the registration database households listed with a 1981 or
older truck no longer had access to that vehicle.
• Unwillingness or inability of a vehicle owner to participate and a high number of
incorrect owner contact information were other factors which hampered efforts
for older bin recruiting.
All possible efforts, such as increasing incentives for vehicles in these bins and offering
special vehicle pick-up and drop-off services, were made to encourage program participation,
especially in these hard to fill bins. In addition, the records with VINs that were matched to
households with incorrect contact information were researched to obtain current owner contact
information.
In addition to recruitment challenges, testing older vehicles was problematic because
these vehicles were often in such a state of disrepair that they would be unsafe to test on the
dynamometer. Repairs were performed on all possible vehicles in order to maximize test
percentages (i.e., replacement of brakes, tires, motor mounts, fuel pumps, etc.). Vehicles were
only rejected from dynamometer testing if repairs were too extensive (such as a vehicle that
would require a new clutch or transmission to test) or if the vehicle would be unsafe to test (and
repairs to render the vehicle safe were again too extensive).
Other issues that hindered dynamometer testing included the recruitment of vehicles that
could not be tested due to dimensions (too long or wide for the dyne), vehicles with all-time all-
wheel drive, or vehicles with traction control that could not be disengaged. Air-cooled vehicles
also were rejected from dynamometer testing in order to avoid engine damage from overheating.
In order to minimize the number of untestable vehicles recruited, feedback is provided to
recruitment staff on all vehicles that cannot be tested because of the above reasons. In addition,
recruiting targets were adjusted (increased) during Round 2 in order to better achieve goals for
bins 1, 2, 5, and 6. As can be seen from Table 3-32, based on all the efforts exerted to meet the
goals for testing vehicles in each bin, we were quite successful in meeting most of the targets.
Table 3-33 lists the various tests conducted during Round 2, in comparison with project
goals. Regardless of dynamometer test eligibility, PEMS tests (on the conditioning run) were
performed on all vehicles (excluding vehicles whose interior would not accommodate a PEMS
device).
3-41
-------
Table 3-33. Round 2 Tests Conducted
Test Type
PEMS Conditioning Test (excluding replicates)
Replicate PEMS Conditioning Test
PEMS Driveaway Test
Dynamometer/PEMS Test (excluding replicates)
Dynamometer/PEMS Test (Round IRetests)
Dynamometer/PEMS Test Replicate
Dynamometer/PEMS Control Vehicle Test
PAMS Driveaway Test
Round 2 Goal
All
1 per week
50
236
25
1 per week
1 per week
N/A
Round 2 Tested
324
19
51
235
43
11
12
8
3.8.3 Round 1 to Round 2 Retest Vehicles
Table 3-34 shows recruiting and testing statistics for vehicles which were originally
tested during Round 1 and were then retested at the start of Round 2 in order to provide
summer/winter correlation data. Forty-two of these Round 1 retest vehicles were tested
(exceeding the retest target of 25 vehicles) in order to ensure all strata were filled. Results of the
Round 1 to Round 2 retest vehicle testing are presented in Section 4.
Table 3-34. Round 2 Dynamometer Tests of Vehicles Originally Tested During
Round 1
BIN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Vehicle Type
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Model Year Group
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Total
Retest Goal
1
4
2
5
2
4
4
3
25
Actual Retested
1
4
2
9
3
4
7
12
42
% of Goal
100%
100%
100%
200%
150%
100%
175%
400%
172%
3-42
-------
4.0 Vehicle Emission Testing
4.1 Typical Testing Day
Vehicles arrived at the test facility at an appointed time determined via the NuStats
scheduling process. Upon arrival, each vehicle first received a unique identification code for
documentation tracking purposes, and was then inspected for test worthiness. Specific vehicle
information, in the form of digital photographs, interview questionnaires, checklists, and hard
copy data forms, was recorded for later input into the MSOD data table EQUIP_IN.dbf
During the inspection process, each test vehicle was evaluated for recently performed
repairs, as well as potential repairs which might be necessary. This served primarily to ensure
that the vehicle could safely be operated on the road and dynamometer. If repairs were required,
the vehicle owner was notified and his/her permission was obtained before repairs were
performed. If the repairs could not be performed on-site, the vehicle was taken to a local repair
shop. Records of the repair, along with a brief narrative, were maintained. Following repair, the
vehicle was outfitted in the normal fashion, conditioned, and cued for testing.
A SEMTECH PEMS unit was then installed on the vehicle to monitor emissions. The
PEMS unit used for the conditioning drive underwent a complete warm-up, zero and audit
sequence to verify CO, CC>2, NOX, and THC measurement accuracy. Calibrations were
performed as necessary to bring the PEMS into proper calibration. At this point, each test
vehicle was prepped using a predetermined route that included high speed accelerations, driving
at freeway speeds, and driving at stop and go traffic patterns. This route is described in detail in
Appendix K. This vehicle preparation was conducted for about 45 minutes, at which point the
PEMS was uninstalled and the vehicle was soaked overnight at ambient temperatures for testing
the next day.
The following day, the vehicle was mounted on the dynamometer, and a PEMS unit was
installed on the vehicle to monitor undiluted emissions, in tandem with the emissions
measurements to be performed by the dynamometer bench. A Positive Displacement Pump-
Constant Volume Sampling (PDP-CVS) system was used to dilute and transport the vehicle
tailpipe exhaust to analyzers during the dynamometer test (shown in Figure 4-1).
In addition to the regulated gas pollutants measured via CVS, continuous measurements
of PM mass were taken using an EPA-supplied Booker Systems Model RPM-101 Quartz Crystal
Microbalance (QCM) manufactured by Sensor's, Inc. and a Thermo-MIE Inc. DataRAM 4000
Nephelometer. BC was measured continuously with a DRI photoacoustic instrument and
integrated samples were collected and analyzed by DRI for PM gravimetric mass, elements,
elemental and OC, ions, particulate and semi-volatile organic compounds, and volatile organic
air toxics. The samples were extracted from the dilution tunnel through a low particulate loss 2.5
|j,m cutpoint pre-classifier. Figure 4-2 presents a schematic of the sampling instrumentation.
It should be first noted that PM is a dynamic pollutant that is constantly being influenced
by its environment therefore its formation is constantly changing both in the exhaust stream and
in the ambient air. Our tests are a snapshot using specific measurements under specific
laboratory and thermodynamic conditions. Real-world PM may differ significantly.
4-1
-------
Diluted exhaust to aldehyde sample aldehyde
dilution air
filter
at46C flow controller t
from vehicle
tailpipe
!
^
to particle sample •
flow controller i
r particle f liter ^^ JL
cart
jf
i heated
sample
line
*LT
t
vent
LJ
V
Dessicator
V
dilution air
heater (46 C)
background
sample line
LJ
Backgrd HC analyzer
V
Air Conditioner
vent
water
trap •
pump
filter
flow
measurement
and control
flow
measurement
and control
Positive
Displacement
Pump (POP)
Heated
HC analyzer
Dilute exhaust
collection bags
high CO T
analyzer
low CO
analyzer
I
NOx analyzer
C02 analyzer
Figure 4-1. CVS Sampling System Schematic
4-2
-------
TEFLON MEMBRANE -
gravimetric ma&s and
J*Sa«iMS!rt)SBJA1M.
OJARff FIlfER - EC^OC
and tons {Alb)
TIGF«AD - PM a'nd SVOC
CANISfERS'wflJO"
DENUDER - UOC
nK4f nqn.i»9D
DNPM CARTRfbCES -
carbonylb fA3b)
1
V
Diluted Exhaust
Constant Volume Sampler
(CVS)
Side A
, PHOTOACOUSTIC - BC
NEPHELOMETER- PMJ 5
IB3)
SideB
Figure 4-2. Kansas City Exhaust Measurement Flowchart
4-3
-------
Figure 4-3. Daily Testing Flowchart
Begin Vehicle Testing - DAY 1
Vehicle
Recruitment
Task
Vehicle Schedulin
Receive Vehicle
- is it Suitable?
Take Picture of
Vehicle - Major
Repair Needed?
Accept Vehicle From
Owner - Swap with
Rental Car
Perform Minor Repairs if
Necessary
Install PEMS for
Conditioning Run
Monitor Exhaust
For Visual Smoke
Perform
Cond. Run -
Acceptable?
Classify Vehicle as Low,
Medium, or High Smoke
Emitter
Soak Vehicle in
Preparation for
Day 2
/^ Go to Vehicle
( Testing Day 2
4-4
Begin Vehicle Testing - DAY 2
Perform Instrument
Blanking Procedure
Mount and Secure
Vehicle on
Dynamometer
Perform 3 Bag
Cycle
Attach Existing PEMS Unit
(with Dilution Tunnel
Intake)
Measure Real Time Mass &
Elemental Carbon (QCM,
Nephelometer, EC)
Integrated Sample Collection for PM Gravimetric
Analysis (Elemental Analysis, EC/OC, Ions, SVOC,
Gaseous Air Toxics-Summa + DNPH Sample)
Disconnect Vehicle
From Instruments
Install PEMS/PAMS Unit
if Selected
Drive Vehicle Off
Dynamometer
At End of Day, Cycle
Heated Air Through
System
-------
At the conclusion of vehicle testing, the vehicle was unloaded, disconnected from the
PEMS and dynamometer sampling systems and removed from the dynamometer. Figure 4-3
presents a flowchart of daily vehicle testing activities.
4.2 Collection and Validation of Data from the Chassis Dynamometer
Round 1 and Round 2 regulated emission results for the participants' vehicles, along with
detailed calculation methods, are presented in Appendices G and H. In addition, much more
comprehensive data files, containing additional emissions and test data, have been transmitted to
EPA. Summaries and graphs of the regulated emission results can be found elsewhere in this
report. The following sub-sections describe the data file structures, data validation, and known
data quality issues associated with the chassis dynamometer regulated emission data collected in
the Kansas City study.
Dynamometer/Regulated Emission Modal Data
In addition to the calculated emission data described above, modal data that were
collected from the dynamometer and regulated emissions bench were uploaded to the project
FTP site. The modal data for each test were collected at a rate of 1 sample-per-second and were
archived as a tab-delimited text file, named with its test number and a PRN extension. A total of
14 data fields are archived in the modal files, as listed in Table 4-1. Four of the data fields,
AmbHC, PAU TEM, Torque, and Fit Spd, are not used in our emission rate calculations and
were collected for QA/QC purposes. Unusual conditions that could have an influence on
emissions measurements are discussed in the subsequent data validation section.
Table 4-1. Dynamometer Modal File Data Fields
Field Name
PDPTEMP
Hi CO
HotHC
NOx
C02
AMBTEMP
RELHUM
LoCO
AmbHC
RrSpd
PBAR
PAU TEM
Torque
FrtSpd
Units
Centigrade
ppm
ppmC
ppm
Percent
Centigrade
Percent
ppm
ppmC
MPH
mmHg
Centigrade
Ft-Lbs
MPH
Description
Temperature of PDP inlet
Diluted exhaust CO concentration from the high range CO analyzer
Diluted exhaust HC concentration from the Heated FID
Diluted exhaust NOx concentration from the NOx analyzer
Diluted exhaust CO2 concentration from the high range CO2 analyzer
Ambient temperature (measured at the test cell)
Ambient relative humidity (measured at the test cell)
Diluted exhaust CO concentration from the low range CO analyzer
Ambient HC concentration from the ambient HC analyzer
Dynamometer rear roll speed
Barometric Pressure (measured at the test cell)
Temperature of the dynamometer's water-cooled Power Absorption Unit
Instantaneous torque measured by the Dynamometer's torque cell
Dynamometer front roll speed
4-5
-------
Gaseous data contained in these files have been time aligned to account for sample
transport delay times. Real time data acquisition and control (DAC) for the dynamometer was
started manually via keyboard stroke. Once started, the DAC sent a start signal to the driver's aid
to begin the driver's trace, and simultaneously began second-by-second data acquisition. The
same signal that started the driver's aid was also sent to peripheral PM sampling equipment
operated by DRI. Hence, all real time data and the start of peripheral sampling equipment were
initially automatically aligned to the start of the driving trace. Real-time data from those sensors
that have essentially instantaneous response, such as speed, torque, temperatures, and pressures,
required no further time alignment. However, to account for normal sample transport time and
instrument response times, real time gas data was time aligned with the vehicle speed. This was
accomplished during post-processing of the collected real time data file. As described in Section
2.2, sample delays were measured for each analyzer during the pilot study.
There are two considerations to be given to the time alignment of gaseous data. The first
is simply a delay time for sample transport; that is, the time it takes the leading edge of an
emission spike leaving the engine to reach the analyzer. Transport of the sample through the
dilution tunnel and sample lines is constant. However, travel time through the vehicle's exhaust
system is variable due to the transient nature of exhaust flows and exhaust system configuration
differences between manufacturers. So, the total sample transport delay time is somewhat
variable from vehicle to vehicle, and from within different portions of the transient driving cycle.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to account for this variability (which amounts to probably up to
3 seconds) during the time alignment process. Therefore, an average delay time (8-12 seconds)
as measured during the pilot study was used to time align data from each gas analyzer.
Secondly, resolution of emission spikes is lost in the sampling and analysis process. For
instance, what may be a 0.5 second engine out emission event may show up as a 5-10 second
spike in the real time data. The loss of resolution is due to sample dilution and diffusion, as well
as instrument response times (analyzer cell flushing). There is no way to regain resolution
through data manipulation, so, although data are sampled and reported at a rate of 1 sample per
second, the "real" resolution is actually on the order of 5-10 seconds. A choice must be made
when time aligning this data: whether to align to the leading edge of an emission spike, or to the
emission spike's maximum value, or somewhere in between. In determining the average delay
times above, the leading edge of the emission spike was chosen. Specifically, the leading edge of
the emission spike from the vehicle's first acceleration in Phase 1 was used as the alignment
guide. The delay times for 10 different tests were determined in this manner, an average for these
10 tests was taken, and these average delay times were used for all of the remaining tests. Spot
checks of a number of additional tests indicated that this process worked well.
Dynamometer load settings for 2000-2005 model year vehicles were found in the
Certified Vehicle Test Result Report (http://www.epa. gov/otaq/crttst.htm). For 1999 and older
vehicles, the Lookup Table Data for Inspection/Maintenance
http://epa.gov/otaq/epg/techguid.htm) was used to determine dynamometer load settings.
Inertias were_generally rounded down in order to prevent overloading participant vehicles.
Edits were also made to several fields of the raw, real-time data for selected tests in order
to correct known errors. A description of these edits is given in the following section.
4-6
-------
Data Validation and Data Quality Issues for Dynamometer Generated Data
Data Validation
The contractor was responsible for gathering and conducting a review on the data as it
pertains to data validation and to identify any data quality issues. The contractor has not
conducted a full review and analysis of the data. EPA plans to conduct further analysis on the
data to better determine its validity and its use in our modeling efforts.
At the conclusion of the study, all dynamometer and associated regulated emissions data
were imported into summary spreadsheets. Numerical elements within each data field were then
compared and checked, using control charts and graphs, for completeness and correctness. Text
data elements were checked manually.
In the case of data input via keyboard by a technician, i.e., bag concentration values or
vehicle and test information, errors that were detected during the data validation process were
reconciled, whenever possible, with input bag concentration values, vehicle and test values
entered on the handwritten test data form.
Collection of the modal data was automated through the use of a data acquisition system.
In this case, data could be compromised due to a fault in the measurement system or with the
measuring sensor itself. If possible, compromised modal data was corrected. This was possible in
only a couple of cases, when it was known that inappropriate conversion factors were applied as
a result of instrument range changes.
The data were also examined to determine if problems existed in the methodology. For
instance, modal gaseous data were compared to bag gaseous data, and any differences found
were cause for closer examination. For each test phase of each test, the ratio of modal-to-bag
concentrations was computed and plotted. Figure 4-4 shows these plots for CO2, CO, NOx, and
HC concentrations for both rounds of the study (Round 1 data is to the left of the vertical line in
each plot). Ratios that varied significantly from 1.0 were investigated. These plots were used
initially to check for gross errors in keyboard input of the bag data, and the plots shown here
have all keyboard errors corrected. For clarity, some invalid values resulting from test issues on
several runs were removed from the plots shown in Figure 4-4, as listed in Table 4-2 below.
Additional information on suspect dynamometer test data was investigated and is discussed in
the following section and in Appendices S and V. In general, data was not eliminated or
modified unless explicitly stated in this section or Appendices S or V.
4-7
-------
CO2 Ratio
Round 1
Round 2
-•-Phase 1
-»- Phase 2
-*- Phase 3
O)
(0
DO
"<5
(0
a:
CO Ratio
Round 1
Round 2
•*- Phase 1
« Phase 2
-*- Phase 3
Figure 4-4. Modal to Bag Ratios for CO2, CO, NOx, and THC
4-8
-------
NOx Ratio
Round 1
O!
re
Round 2
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Round 1
THC Ratio
Round 2
Phase 1
Phase2
Phase3
Figure 4-4. Modal to Bag Ratios for CO2, CO, NOx, and THC (continued)
4-9
-------
Table 4-2. Null Data Removed From Figures 4-4 through 4-6
Run#
Issue
84032
No Phase 3 bag NOX data
84039
No Phase 3 bag NOX data
84047
No Phase 3 bag NOX data
84093
No Phase 1 bag NOX data
84127
Bags were being evacuated for the first 30 seconds of Phase 1, Round 1 bag data voided
No Phase 3 bag NOX data
84140
84149
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84156
No bag data for Phases 1 or 2
84192
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84201
No bag data for Phases 1 and 2
84235
Bag did not fill during Phase 1
84265
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84278
No bag data available for test
84297
No modal (real-time second-by-second) NOX data for Phase 3
84334
No Phase 1 bag CO data
84343
No modal NOX data for test
84349
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84393
Bags not fully evacuated prior to start of test, no bag data for any pollutant or phase
84408
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84409
Bags not fully evacuated prior to start of test, no bag data for any pollutant or phase
84414
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84430
Bags not fully evacuated prior to start of test, no bag data for any pollutant or phase
84438
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84444
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84464
No Phase 3 bag NOX data
84536
Bags inadvertently evacuated during Phases 1 and 2, Phase 3 bag data is only phase available
No bag CO2 data for Phase 3
84624
84766
No Phase 3 bag CO data
84773
No bag CO data for Phase 3
84777
Bags not fully evacuated prior to start of test, no bag data for any pollutant or phase
Known Data Quality Issues
The following section describes issues associated with the Kansas City data, along with
corrective actions applied. Affected test numbers described in the following sections are
summarized in the list of known test issues included in Appendices S and V.
Measurements:
While both modal and bag measurements were made for the regulated emissions, our
intent was to provide the modal analysis as the primary source of emissions data, with the bag
data to serve as a back-up and cross-check to the modal data. As shown in Tables 4-3 through 4-
7, there generally was good agreement between the modal and bag data. The primary quality
issue associated with the modal measurements is under-reporting of HC and CO emission rates
for very high emitters due to concentrations higher than the instruments designed measuring
range.
4-10
-------
Table 4-3. HC Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2.
Test#
Rndl
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
Rnd2
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
Odometer
Miles
13139
13158
13170
13189
13208
13239
13250
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
13729
13748
13768
13788
13809
13828
13871
13936
14013
14033
14052
14072
Date
07/26/2004
8/02/2004
08/07/2004
08/14/2004
08/18/2004
08/25/2004
09/08/2004
09/14/2004
09/24/2004
09/27/2004
09/29/2004
10/01/2004
Average
Standard Deviation
CoeffofVar
01/22/2005
01/26/2005
01/31/2005
02/05/2005
02/11/2005
02/14/2005
02/22/2005
03/03/2005
03/08/2005
03/14/2005
03/22/2005
03/31/2005
Average
Standard Deviation
CoeffofVar
Amb. Temp
F
76.4
93.5
81.5
74.1
77.4
81.0
72.0
87.7
79.6
77.6
73.7
72.0
78.873
24.9
43.9
40.2
58.9
51.7
54.0
43.8
51.9
44.6
46.1
42.6
53.9
46.354
Phi Bag
gm/mile
5.362
5.367
6.561
5.351
5.356
5.451
6.180
5.222
5.208
5.448
5.475
5.932
5.576
0.403
7.233
13.345
7.749
8.217
6.805
7.937
7.707
7.475
9.369
8.379
9.600
8.255
7.940
8.565
1.615
18.854
Ph2 Bag
gm/mile
2.104
2.208
2.083
2.082
2.137
2.263
2.181
2.160
2.055
2.059
2.042
2.173
2.129
0.066
3.112
2.438
2.230
2.351
2.179
2.336
2.297
2.340
2.273
2.166
2.305
2.416
2.401
2.311
0.084
3.644
Ph3 Bag
gm/mile
3.567
4.040
3.561
3.602
3.523
3.813
3.552
3.499
3.424
3.534
3.417
3.501
3.586
0.167
4.668
3.629
3.397
3.659
3.434
3.602
3.669
3.760
3.587
3.262
3.668
3.925
3.710
3. 608
0.168
4.663
Wtd Bag
gm/mile
2.372
2.495
2.417
2.355
2.401
2.534
2.481
2.411
2.311
2.338
2.313
2.463
2.407
0.070
2.916
3.095
2.601
2.745
2.509
2.720
2.679
2.708
2.730
2.565
2.775
2.829
2.783
2.728
0.143
5.227
Phi Modal
gm/mile
4.740
4.824
5.754
4.529
4.524
4.682
5.462
5.607
4.764
4.798
5.211
5.414
5.026
0.419
8.328
12.585
7.192
7.546
6.261
7.078
6.697
8.661
7.793
8.911
7.684
7.197
7.964
1.637
20.560
Ph2 Modal
gm/mile
1.877
2.009
1.816
1.711
1.743
2.074
1.908
1.938
1.885
1.855
1.900
1.989
1.892
0.100
5.307
2.272
2.020
2.072
1.915
2.106
2.073
2.046
1.939
2.096
2.148
2.149
2.076
0.095
4.565
Ph3 Modal
gm/mile
3.342
3.618
3.265
3.159
3.130
3.619
3.336
3.370
3.276
3.316
3.356
3.341
3.344
0.142
4.257
3.562
3.233
3.602
3.286
3.424
3.473
3.292
3.181
3.487
3.599
3.400
3.413
0.141
4.133
Wtd Modal
gm/mile
2.124
2.263
2.120
1.955
1.983
2.314
2.189
2.227
2.129
2.110
2.170
2.262
2.154
0.104
4.818
2.905
2.376
2.461
2.239
2.461
2.413
2.474
2.330
2.544
2.541
2.501
2.477
0.161
6.505
4-11
-------
Table 4-4. NOx Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2.
Test#
Rndl
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
Rnd2
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
Odometer
Miles
13139
13158
13170
13189
13208
13239
13250
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
13729
13748
13768
13788
13809
13828
13871
13936
14013
14033
14052
14072
Date
07/26/2004
8/02/2004
08/07/2004
08/14/2004
08/18/2004
08/25/2004
09/08/2004
09/14/2004
09/24/2004
09/27/2004
09/29/2004
10/01/2004
Average
Standard Dev
CoeffofVar
01/22/2005
01/26/2005
01/31/2005
02/05/2005
02/11/2005
02/14/2005
02/22/2005
03/03/2005
03/08/2005
03/14/2005
03/22/2005
03/31/2005
Average
Standard Dev
CoeffofVar
Amb. Temp
F
76.4
93.5
81.5
74.1
77.4
81.0
72.0
87.7
79.6
77.6
73.7
72.0
78.873
24.9
43.9
40.2
58.9
51.7
54.0
43.8
51.9
44.6
46.1
42.6
53.9
46.354
Phi Bag
gm/mile
6.900
8.199
7.543
7.062
7.543
7.595
7.745
7.027
7.152
7.922
6.872
5.862
7.285
0.589
8.080
5.039
5.928
6.183
5.959
5.391
5.918
6.208
5.668
4.715
5.496
5.998
5.727
5.686
0.437
7.683
Ph2 Bag
gm/mile
5.623
6.808
5.755
5.352
6.351
6.129
5.918
5.993
5.498
6.259
5.470
4.607
5.814
0.543
9.348
4.695
4.958
5.216
4.993
4.611
5.006
4.999
4.845
4.301
4.521
4.799
4.767
4.809
0.240
4.997
Ph3 Bag
gm/mile
6.962
8.555
6.973
6.689
8.092
8.032
7.173
7.276
6.832
8.050
6.841
5.580
7.255
0.779
10.732
6.314
6.030
6.731
6.289
5.231
6.451
5.909
5.974
5.640
5.676
5.914
5.981
6.012
0.383
6.375
Wtd Bag
gm/mile
5.780
6.998
5.931
5.532
6.533
6.335
6.098
6.135
5.675
6.470
5.637
4.741
5.989
0.558
9.316
4.828
5.084
5.369
5.134
4.696
5.155
5.126
4.966
4.416
4.651
4.940
4.902
4.939
0.251
5.079
Phi Modal
gm/mile
3.704
4.824
4.044
3.535
3.776
6.808
5.481
5.358
5.246
5.933
4.594
4.071
4.781
0.970
20.282
3.549
4.160
4.005
4.201
3.856
3.953
3.431
2.844
3.093
3.671
3.189
3.632
0.432
11.887
Ph2 Modal
gm/mile
2.490
3.359
2.674
2.291
2.634
4.910
3.704
4.048
3.457
3.995
3.045
2.687
3.274
0.751
22.940
2.853
3.149
3.132
3.238
2.935
2.838
2.474
2.139
2.173
2.726
2.235
2.777
0.385
14.179
Ph3 Modal
gm/mile
5.824
7.548
6.152
5.451
5.079
7.632
6.316
6.565
6.207
7.381
5.441
4.731
6.194
0.918
14.816
5.804
5.764
5.586
5.782
5.934
5.508
5.085
4.848
5.098
5.711
5.069
5.472
0.359
6.560
Wtd Modal
gm/mile
2.778
3.719
2.985
2.572
2.862
5.195
3.974
4.291
3.739
4.332
3.290
2.902
3.553
0.761
21.405
3.100
3.385
3.345
3.467
3.192
3.082
2.706
2.366
2.423
2.985
2.484
2.958
0.382
12.913
4-12
-------
Table 4-5. CO Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2.
Test*
Rndl
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
Rnd2
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
Odometer
Miles
13139
13158
13170
13189
13208
13239
13250
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
13729
13748
13768
13788
13809
13828
13871
13936
14013
14033
14052
14072
Date
07/26/2004
8/02/2004
08/07/2004
08/14/2004
08/18/2004
08/25/2004
09/08/2004
09/14/2004
09/24/2004
09/27/2004
09/29/2004
10/01/2004
Average
Standard
Dev
CoeffofVar
01/22/2005
01/26/2005
01/31/2005
02/05/2005
02/11/2005
02/14/2005
02/22/2005
03/03/2005
03/08/2005
03/14/2005
03/22/2005
03/31/2005
Average
Standard
Dev
CoeffofVar
Amb. Temp
F
76.4
93.5
81.5
74.1
77.4
81.0
72.0
87.7
79.6
77.6
73.7
72.0
78.873
24.9
43.9
40.2
58.9
51.7
54.0
43.8
51.9
44.6
46.1
42.6
53.9
46.354
Phi Bag
gm/mile
34.977
27.959
32.694
32.244
31.351
27.324
38.321
29.708
31.081
31.475
32.212
36.440
32.149
3.080
9.581
126.810
69.908
76.089
55.299
69.732
64.861
66.274
79.561
88.814
83.019
73.603
62.267
76.35.3
17.617
23.073
Ph2 Bag
gm/mile
13.353
14.581
13.242
13.546
15.365
13.648
13.538
13.170
12.899
12.983
13.858
12.967
13.596
0.695
5.114
22.085
15.115
17.209
13.618
15.236
15.664
15.972
16.556
17.962
17.171
17.594
15.879
16.672
2.006
12.034
Ph3 Bag
gm/mile
20.406
24.411
20.255
21.736
20.090
20.142
21.472
19.738
20.405
21.085
20.318
19.895
20.830
1.230
5.905
25.226
20.550
20.899
20.626
21.025
23.548
21.851
21.995
22.438
23.222
24.529
21.838
22.312
1.470
6.586
Wtd Bag
gm/mile
14.950
15.936
14.734
15.070
16.526
14.798
15.358
14.481
14.348
14.509
15.245
14.677
15.053
0.614
4.076
27.803
18.372
20.523
16.293
18.521
18.818
19.023
20.180
21.948
20.985
21.024
18.726
20.185
2.726
13.504
Phi Modal
gm/mile
34.747
27.801
32.347
30.533
29.486
26.567
36.865
29.612
31.314
31.479
32.493
36.483
31.644
3.058
9.664
130.208
75.064
118.858
56.276
67.155
70.433
82.804
92.296
85.587
75.408
65.368
83.587
21.655
25.907
Ph2 Modal
gm/mile
13.245
14.452
13.122
12.646
14.030
13.109
12.916
12.970
12.846
12.859
13.682
12.863
13.228
0.524
3.959
21.423
14.980
16.828
13.385
15.508
15.730
16.164
17.599
16.885
17.236
15.743
16.498
1.919
11.632
Ph3 Modal
gm/mile
21.056
24.464
20.911
20.815
19.173
20.147
20.854
19.644
20.663
21.134
20.880
20.008
20.812
1.248
5.994
25.934
21.365
22.039
21.347
24.013
22.697
22.657
23.072
24.229
25.317
22.918
23.235
1.429
6.149
Wtd Modal
gm/mile
14.887
15.818
14.655
14.128
15.191
14.286
14.694
14.293
14.331
14.404
15.143
14.596
14. 702
0.468
3.180
27.452
18.581
22.491
16.191
18.834
19.087
20.049
21.854
20.936
20.859
18.846
20.471
2.770
13.531
4-13
-------
Table 4-6. CO2 Emissions for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2.
Test*
Rndl
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
Rnd2
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
Odometer
Miles
13139
13158
13170
13189
13208
13239
13250
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
13729
13748
13768
13788
13809
13828
13871
13936
14013
14033
14052
14072
Date
07/26/2004
8/02/2004
08/07/2004
08/14/2004
08/18/2004
08/25/2004
09/08/2004
09/14/2004
09/24/2004
09/27/2004
09/29/2004
10/01/2004
Average
Standard
Dev
CoeffofVar
01/22/2005
01/26/2005
01/31/2005
02/05/2005
02/11/2005
02/14/2005
02/22/2005
03/03/2005
03/08/2005
03/14/2005
03/22/2005
03/31/2005
Average
Standard
Dev
CoeffofVar
Amb. Temp
F
76.4
93.5
81.5
74.1
77.4
81.0
72.0
87.7
79.6
77.6
73.7
72.0
78.873
24.9
43.9
40.2
58.9
51.7
54.0
43.8
51.9
44.6
46.1
42.6
53.9
46.354
Phi Bag
gm/mile
655.596
701.022
698.986
668.594
662.173
671.201
686.038
641.921
664.857
660.165
676.372
666.596
671.127
16.534
2.464
714.152
656.205
720.258
647.458
690.058
661.944
681.418
681.971
640.040
694.395
673.616
631.061
674.381
26.935
3.994
Ph2 Bag
gm/mile
386.177
401.557
394.152
385.104
407.598
400.773
394.461
382.460
385.410
383.192
393.683
386.881
391.787
7.875
2.010
400.129
383.396
410.801
379.259
393.408
390.467
394.107
392.582
374.459
390.042
393.320
386.203
390.681
9.088
2.326
Ph3 Bag
gm/mile
546.714
573.925
561.646
537.781
576.557
582.138
522.006
535.629
540.777
540.884
554.462
533.293
550.484
18.396
3.342
539.755
512.578
551.668
518.918
517.852
535.082
529.037
512.840
506.561
516.104
518.953
513.754
522. 759
12. 777
2.444
Wtd Bag
gm/mile
410.991
428.644
421.490
410.177
432.517
427.151
418.218
406.503
410.449
408.592
419.272
411.738
417.145
8.367
2.006
426.560
406.759
436.486
403.106
417.783
414.876
418.546
415.889
397.494
414.465
416.850
408.001
414. 735
9.932
2.395
Phi Modal
gm/mile
660.250
702.250
699.583
633.353
626.736
660.720
662.598
637.310
669.062
658.169
685.317
670.909
663. 855
23.018
3.467
736.229
671.182
740.207
668.852
684.845
703.068
716.592
669.567
727.570
694.603
665.312
698.003
27.168
3.892
Ph2 Modal
gm/mile
383.352
399.921
391.552
358.689
380.095
385.876
374.387
387.625
380.866
378.604
394.606
385.451
383.419
10.105
2.636
399.200
380.906
408.635
378.133
389.656
393.037
389.410
373.870
386.607
391.273
387.348
388.916
9.207
2.367
Ph3 Modal
gm/mile
566.654
593.783
575.821
518.947
551.493
584.863
515.336
540.899
556.551
544.969
610.149
549.878
559.112
27.412
4.903
560.667
532.453
573.823
538.290
547.342
548.544
533.069
-
541.654
550.234
540.866
546.694
12.108
2.215
Wtd Modal
gm/mile
410.095
428.619
420.211
383.831
404.767
413.690
398.889
411.169
407.760
404.744
424.383
411.871
410.002
11.345
2.767
428.396
406.752
437.125
404.597
416.227
420.095
416.298
-
414.925
418.348
412.708
417.547
9.088
2.177
4-14
-------
Table 4-7. Fuel Economy for the EPA975 Control Vehicle during Rounds 1 and 2.
Test*
Rndl
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
Rnd2
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
Odometer
Miles
13139
13158
13170
13189
13208
13239
13250
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
13729
13748
13768
13788
13809
13828
13871
13936
14013
14033
14052
14072
Date
07/26/2004
8/02/2004
08/07/2004
08/14/2004
08/18/2004
08/25/2004
09/08/2004
09/14/2004
09/24/2004
09/27/2004
09/29/2004
10/01/2004
Average
Standard Dev
CoeffofVar
01/22/2005
01/26/2005
01/31/2005
02/05/2005
02/11/2005
02/14/2005
02/22/2005
03/03/2005
03/08/2005
03/14/2005
03/22/2005
03/31/2005
Average
Standard Dev
CoeffofVar
Amb. Temp
F
76.4
93.5
81.5
74.1
77.4
81.0
72.0
87.7
79.6
77.6
73.7
72.0
78.873
24.9
43.9
40.2
58.9
51.7
54.0
43.8
51.9
44.6
46.1
42.6
53.9
46.354
Phi Bag
mpg
11.83
11.30
11.16
11.69
11.82
11.77
11.24
12.21
11.79
11.84
11.56
11.59
11.650
0.286
2.459
9.02
10.90
9.95
11.40
10.45
10.93
10.65
10.30
10.69
10.08
10.57
11.43
10.528
0.631
5.993
Ph2 Bag
mpg
20.80
19.95
20.42
20.84
19.63
20.05
20.37
20.99
20.88
20.99
20.40
20.78
20.509
0.430
2.096
19.46
20.79
19.34
21.13
20.28
20.39
20.19
20.23
21.03
20.30
20.09
20.57
20.316
0.519
2.552
Ph3 Bag
mpg
14.59
13.77
14.23
14.76
13.90
13.75
15.18
14.90
14.75
14.71
14.41
14.95
14.492
0.460
3.171
14.58
15.50
14.45
15.32
15.32
14.76
14.97
15.41
15.60
15.27
15.11
15.39
15.139
0.357
2.357
Wtd Bag
mpg
19.47
18.65
19.03
19.50
18.47
18.78
19.12
19.70
19.55
19.62
19.10
19.45
19.203
0.392
2.040
17.94
19.40
18.04
19.72
18.91
19.02
18.85
18.88
19.57
18.88
18.77
19.30
18.939
0.518
2.733
Phi Modal
mpg
11.793
11.308
11.198
12.373
12.522
12.000
11.666
12.268
11.737
11.908
11.433
11.548
11.813
0.402
3.406
8.788
10.611
9.059
11.085
10.599
10.317
9.856
10.265
9.678
10.288
10.894
10.131
0.691
6.821
Ph2 Modal
mpg
20.989
20.065
20.596
22.417
21.115
20.840
21.480
20.784
21.148
21.270
20.391
20.894
20.999
0.566
2.693
19.570
20.961
19.499
21.251
20.471
20.296
20.442
21.124
20.515
20.256
20.559
20.450
0.532
2.602
Ph3 Modal
mpg
14.103
13.372
13.905
15.325
14.551
13.707
15.407
14.778
14.361
14.622
13.170
14.542
14.320
0.672
4.691
14.057
14.945
13.894
14.792
14.452
14.470
14.872
-
14.579
14.321
14.656
14.504
0.324
2.235
Wtd Modal
Mpg
19.553
18.686
19.130
20.881
19.791
19.410
20.069
19.533
19.696
19.831
18.916
19.476
19.581
0.543
2.773
17.916
19.420
17.932
19.701
18.986
18.815
18.902
-
18.892
18.756
19.128
18.845
0.536
2.845
4-15
-------
1.) COi: COi ratios, shown in Figure 4-4, which includes both Round 1 and Round 2
data, typically showed the most consistency of all the regulated gaseous emissions
and remained around 1.0. The primary exceptions are issues listed above (which
have been removed from Figure 4-4).
2) CO: In the graph of modal :bag ratios for CO shown in Figure 4-4, quite a few
more excursions away from a ratio of 1.0 are found. These excursions are
primarily found at concentration levels below 10 ppm, as the minimum detectable
limit of 0.5% of full scale (5 ppm) as specified by Horiba Instruments is
approached. This can be seen in Figure 4-5, which shows the modal:bag ratios
plotted as a function of concentration. Ratios also start to decrease as measured
concentrations increase, in two cases markedly. This is the result of transient CO
spikes occurring in the real time which are beyond the analytical capability of the
analyzer (i.e., off-scale real time data). The more off-scale points occurring
during a phase, the larger the decrease in the real time to bag ratio. Due to the use
of two different CO analyzers covering different ranges (0-1,000 ppm and 0-
10,000 ppm), this problem is minimized for CO measurement and only occurred
in two instances as can be seen in Figure 4-5 Phase 1 data. Appendices S and V
provide information on tests where instrument "pegging" may have occurred.
4-16
-------
o> 1.3
?! LI
n
"§ 0.9
^0.7
gO.5
0.3
1
CO-Phase 1
Modal vs Bag
° ^SftbflJ
D
. D
D
SPto^B^&D
D
D
10 100 1000 10000
Modal Concentration, ppm
CO-Phase 2
Modal vs Bag
o> 1.3
£ 1-1
d
"§ 0.9
* 07
o
n 0.5
0.3
S
mm m °£an
a _n°fl
u n ° ^rP tiT
*n
n
D
D
a
" & an na
a
•
a
D
a
a aa|1-M-p J3-1 °%a no
u
1 10 100 1000 10000
Modal Concentration, ppm
2.2
ra 2
m 1.8
3 1-6
| 1.4
A 1-2
1 1
^ 0.8
0.6
1
CO-Phase 3
Modal vs Bag
D
S
m
a
D D
•
• D ° D
_. ff e °-D^
n
D
n
n ,-,
-jm^fefe&feertfeiHe
D n'
^B^d? BQ.B QD
10 100 1000 10000
Modal Concentration, ppm
Figure 4-5. By-Phase Modal to Bag CO Ratios vs. Modal CO Concentration, both
Rounds
4-17
-------
3.) HC: As with CO measurements, agreement between the modal and bag HC
measurements drops off for very low and very high HC concentrations. In Figure
4-6, the HC modal to bag ratios are plotted against HC concentration. For higher
emitting vehicles, the modal data contains a larger number of off-scale data
points (i.e., >1,250 ppmC), resulting in the modal data under-reporting HC. A
couple of factors influenced the disagreement between modal and bag HC
measurements on the lower end. First, bag HC measurements were recorded to ±
1 ppm, while modal HC measurements were recorded to ± 0.001 ppm. Secondly,
CVS bags were not purged between the last (and dirtiest) test of one day and the
first (and cleanest) test of the next day. HC desorbtion from the bag surfaces
from an extremely high HC emitter could elevate HC bag concentrations from a
lower emitter. Conversely, at higher concentration measurements, some HC
could adsorb onto the bag surface, thereby decreasing the measured HC
concentration. No correction was applied to the HC bag data to account for the
potential absorption/adsorption in the bag. Likewise no correction was
performed to the modal data to account for underreporting of HC data due to off-
scale measurements. Since vehicles were generally tested from the "cleanest" to
the "dirtiest" on a daily basis, Figure 4-6 compares the first test of the day
(lowest emitting vehicle) to the last test of the day (highest emitting vehicle).
This could help illustrate bag desorbtion influences on the modal to bag ratio
results for the first test of the day.
AMBHC- An FID was dedicated to measuring the building background HC
concentrations. These measurements are not used in the emission rate calculations, but were
recorded to document building background HC levels. This instrument was functional only
during portions of Round 1, and not at all during Round 2. During the last half of Round 1, the
instrument was operated on the 0-1000 ppmC range instead of the 0-100 ppmC range. This
resulted in a scaling factor error of 10. AMBHC measurements on all affected runs were edited
by dividing by 10 to reflect true concentrations. In addition, the sampling valve for the AMBHC
instrument was turned to the wrong position at the start of one run (84079), resulting in diluted
exhaust, instead of building background air, being sampled during the first 630 seconds of this
test. AMBHC for the first 630 seconds of this run are therefore void, as indicated in the edited
PRN file for this run. This and other test issues, as well as data corrections performed, are listed
in Appendices S and V.
4) NOx: NOx converter efficiency, affecting NOx bag measurements, is the culprit
in the bad agreement between NOx modal and bag measurements, as seen in
Figure 4-4. Due to the large differences seen, all NOx bag data for Rounds 1 and
2 have been invalidated, and should not be used. With the exception of the NOx
bag data shown here in comparison with modal data, all dynamometer "by phase"
results are based on real-time modal measurements, not bag measurements.
Modal NOX was lost on two runs (84343 and 84297) due to the instrument's
ozonator air running out or being turned off. NOX for the entire 84343 test was
lost, while only Phase 2 and Phase 3 of 84297 were lost.
4-18
-------
HC-Phase 1
Modal vs Bag
10 100 1000
Modal Concentration, ppm
10000
D)
m 1,
05
0.8
o!4
0.2
0
HC-Phase 2
Modal vs Bag
10 100 1000
Modal Concentration, ppm
10000
DQ '
E 0.8
^ 0.6
° 0.4
0.2
HC-Phase 3
Modal vs Bag
10 100 1000
Modal Concentration, ppm
10000
Figure 4-6. By-Phase Modal to Bag HC Ratios vs. Modal HC Concentration, both
Rounds
4-19
-------
One final note on the modal data, although it was collected and is being reported at the
rate of 1 hertz (1 sample per second), the smallest mode that can be realistically resolved is
probably on the order of 10 seconds. This is due to the effects of sample transport from the
vehicle's exhaust system to the analyzer and inherent analyzer response times. The problem is
twofold. First, transient engine-out emissions (spikes) may only last a half second or so. But once
diluted and transported to the analyzer, the same emission spike will be recorded by the analyzer
as a 5-10 second event. Secondly, exhaust transport times through the vehicle's exhaust system
and transfer tube will be changing continuously due to the transient nature of the driving cycles.
These effects must be considered when using the data for second-by-second analysis or
emissions models. Both true bag and true modal data were collected during this study and are
being provided to the EPA for a final determination regarding how the data should be used.
Dynamometer Measurements:
Torque- Zero offset in the torque measurement system was a noticeable, intermittent
problem on ~ 25 runs during the first portion of Round 1 testing. The cause of the zero offsets
was traced to a faulty connection on an in-line fuse holder within the torque measurement circuit.
The fuse holder was replaced and no further problems were encountered. The torque zero offset
was calculated for each run in Round 1 as the average torque signal obtained during the engine
off portion of the test (T = 1500 to 2000 seconds). Corrections for zero offset were determined
and applied only to the Round 1 torque data, as the Round 2 torque data were unaffected by the
offset.
Torque data for one run (84141) was lost due to the extremely large offset (177ft-lbs.).
The next 24 most affected runs had offsets ranging from 5.54 to 0.10 ft Ibs, all of which were
satisfactorily corrected. The remaining tests had zero offsets of less than 0.10 ft-lbs. On four runs
(84073, 84109, 84214, 84215) only Phase 3 was baseline corrected as the baseline drift
apparently began during the hot soak. Torque data from another run (84051) were voided due to
negative baseline drift. In addition, the torque board became dislodged during Phase 2 of one test
(84279), so only Phase 1 torque data are good for this run.
Torque measurement for another 25 runs in Round 1 was affected when a gain
potentiometer was inadvertently adjusted. This affected the real time torque measurement only,
not the dynamometer loading circuit nor the readout meter used to set load and display
coastdown values. The tests affected by this were conducted from July 20 through July 24 (runs
84051-84076). The potentiometer was readjusted late on July 24, 2004 and from that point
forward, was checked on a daily basis during the mid-day blank collection. No further
adjustment was required for the remainder of the summer phase. Affected real time data were
corrected by applying a correction factor to the second by second data. A correction factor was
determined by noting that, on average, the dynamometer set point loading (Hp@ 50 mph) was
89% of the average torque measured during Phase 2 for unaffected runs, while only 55% on
affected runs. The correction factor 89/55 = 1.62 was applied to torque for the affected runs.
Torque measurement on one test in Round 2 was affected as a result of the torque board
dislodging during the test. The affected test was 84614. For this test, no valid torque
measurement was made; however, the torque control system remained functional, maintaining
the proper vehicle loading.
4-20
-------
The affected runs described in this section are included in the list of known test issues
provided in Appendices S and V. In addition, Appendix BB provides results from the pilot
study, which shows a good correlation between EPA's dynamometer laboratory in Ann Arbor,
Michigan and EPA's portable Clayton dynamometer used for this study.
Relative humidity measurements- On a few occasions, the relative humidity sensor was
operated on a dead 9 vdc battery, which resulted in invalid relative humidity measurements. The
affected Round 2 tests include 84532-84534 on 2/11/05 and 84681-84687 on 3/19/05. The
affected Round 1 test is 84258 on 9/8/04. In order to provide humidity/temperature corrected
NOx values, the invalid relative humidity data for these tests was supplemented with relative
humidity data from the KC airport. Details for all affected tests are provided in Appendices S
andV.
Other Chassis Dynamometer Test Conditions
Round 1 and Round 2 test temperatures and barometric pressures are shown in Figure 4-
7.
Dilution Tunnel Temperatures: As seen in Figure 4-8, dilution tunnel temperatures, as
measured at the PDF inlet, remained fairly constant throughout Round 1 and Round 2 testing.
Phase 1 and Phase 3 PDF inlet temperatures remained around 46°C except for a couple of
occasions during Round 1 (the dilution heater was not turned on) and also during Round 2 (the
heater contactor failed) when temperatures remained near ambient. Phase 2 PDF inlet
temperatures were also maintained around 46°C, except for the larger vehicles, where dilution
factors were low and raw exhaust temperatures were high, particularly during high vehicle speed
and acceleration operation. On twenty of the larger vehicles, Phase 2 tunnel temperatures
averaged over 50°C. Tunnel air temperatures should not significantly affect gaseous regulated
emission measurements. Temperature effects on paniculate measurements are unknown. All
tests where the average dilution tunnel temperatures exceeded 50C during any phase are included
in the list of known test issues provided in Appendices S and V.
Driving violations- Numerous driving violations (as defined in the CFR for certification
testing) were known to occur during the course of testing. Driving violations occurred mostly
due to trouble stopping or slowing the test vehicles while following the aggressive deceleration
rates of the LA92 driving cycle on the Clayton dynamometer. A few of the older, rear wheel
drive vehicles had weak rear brakes to start off with which became weaker as they heated as the
cycle proceeded. Many of the newer test vehicles would lose traction on the dynamometer's
rolls while braking resulting in "skidding" of the stopped tires on the still moving dynamometer
rolls. On the other hand, many of the older test vehicles ran poorly and had trouble maintaining
the acceleration rates and higher speeds of the LA92 driving cycle. Driving violations were not
quantified, although field notes indicate when obvious trace violations occurred. This
information is provided in the list of known test issues provided in Appendices S and V.
However, the modal data files contain the actual vehicle speed versus time trace for each test, so
driving violations can be analyzed at a later date by comparing target vehicle speed for the LA92
test to that provided in the modal data. In the current presentation of the emissions data, no tests
were invalidated due to driving violations.
4-21
-------
770
GO
120
Round 1
Round 1
Barometric Pressure
Test#
Test Cell Temperatures
Test*
Round 2
Round 2
Figure 4-7. Rounds 1 and 2 Test Temperatures and Barometric Pressure
4-22
-------
Dilution Tunnel Temperatures
Round 1 Round 2
o
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Test#
Figure 4-8. Rounds 1 and 2 Dilution Tunnel Temperatures.
HC Background Concentrations: Hydrocarbon background concentrations were
measured through the dilution tunnel during the 10-minute engine-off period between Phase 2
and Phase 3. Background concentrations were low, indicating good ventilation through the test
area. Average measured concentrations were over 10 ppmC on 4 occasions, as seen in Figure 4-
9. These four incidents occurred while testing extremely high HC emitters with known exhaust
leaks; however, the HC background could also be elevated due to other vehicles being operated
in the area. The HC background as measured through the dilution tunnel during the 10 minute
soak was used to perform HC bag/modal reading corrections for all tests, including those in
which the background exceeded 10 ppmC. As no limits had been established for background
levels, no tests were invalidated due to elevated background levels.
4-23
-------
HC Background Concentration
Round 1 Round 2
25
o
E
Q.
Q.
O"
20
15
10
Test#
Figure 4-9. Rounds 1 and 2 Tunnel HC Levels With Engine Off Between Phase 2
and Phase 3.
Control Vehicle Tests
Several steps were taken to ensure precise and accurate emission test results were
gathered during the Kansas City Study. As described in Appendix BB, a pilot study was
conducted using vehicles tested both at EPA's dynamometer laboratory in Ann Arbor, Michigan
and at the Kansas City test facility using EPA's portable Clayton dynamometer. After the pilot
study was concluded, one of EPA's test vehicles (a 1988 Ford Taurus) was retained to use
throughout the Kansas City study to use as a control test vehicle. This section presents regulated
emission results from the Round 1 and Round 2 dynamometer testing conducted on the EPA
provided control vehicle (EPA975). Additional details on the control vehicle testing, including
PEMS results and results from dynamometer testing in Ann Arbor, can be found in Section 4.4.3,
Control Vehicle Results. A total of 24 chassis dynamometer tests were conducted on the control
vehicle in Kansas City using the transportable dynamometer. This included twelve tests in Round
1 and twelve tests in Round 2. Tests were conducted over the cold-start LA92 driving cycle. The
control vehicle was fueled using an Indolene fuel provided by EPA. Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3,
and weighted regulated emission rates and fuel economy results for these tests, along with
average emission rates, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation (COV) are presented in
Tables 4-3 (HC bag and modal results), 4-4 (NOxbag and modal results), 4-5 (CO bag and modal
results), 4-6 (CC>2 bag and modal results) and 4-7 (Fuel economy bag and modal results).
Differences in emission rates and coefficients of variation can be seen from Round 1 to Round 2,
particularly in Phase 1 HC and CO emission rates. These differences are more than likely due to
ambient temperature effects. Average test temperatures for the control vehicle during Rounds 1
and 2 were 78.9°F and 46.4°F, respectively. The lowest test temperature encountered for the
control vehicle during Round 2 was ~ 25 F. This test resulted in extremely high HC emissions
for Phase 1 and high CO emission during all three Phases, which skewed Round 2 COVs upward
for these compounds, as can be seen in Tables 4-3 and 4-5. Without results from this test
included, COVs for Rounds 1 and 2 would be very similar. With the exception of NOX (to which
4-24
-------
a humidity correction factor was applied), bag and modal results have not been corrected for
temperature, barometric pressure or relative humidity.
With the exceptions noted above, Rounds 1 and 2 COVs for HC, CO, CC>2, and fuel
economy were generally less than about 5% for the stabilized Phase 2 and warm-start transient
Phase 3. Somewhat higher COVs occurred for the cold-start Phase 1 HC and CO emissions,
again presumably the result of cold start ambient temperature conditions. Precision for NOX was
not as good, with the COV at just under 10 % for the humidity corrected NOX emission rates.
Although not shown in the table, the precision for the uncorrected NOX was somewhat better,
with a COV of 5.7 %. This suggests that applying the NOX correction factor, with such diverse
humidity and temperature conditions, is at least partially responsible for the decay in precision
for the corrected NOX emission rates. The NOX correction factor used for both the PEMS and
dynamometer systems is that defined in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, part 86.1342-
90. For gasoline combustion, this correction factor is specified as:
K,=
l-0.0047(H-75)
where H is the absolute humidity in grains of water per pound of dry air. Since this correction
factor is based on a relatively small study conducted on pre-catalyst vehicles under limited
conditions, it's applicability to extreme temperature and humidity conditions seen in Kansas City
may be limited. Future analysis of NOX emissions using a revised correction factor applicable to
a wider temperature/humidity range may be of benefit.
Bag data were also collected on a routine basis as a backup and verification of modal
results. Precision for bag HC, CO, CO2, and fuel economy was similar to the modal results, with
coefficients of variation in general less than 5 %. Excellent agreement was also found between
modal and bag CO and CO2 emissions, indicating that no flow/leak problems existed. Bag HC
emissions were slightly less than modal HC emissions, probably as a result of some HC
absorption on the unheated surfaces of the bag analysis system.
'X
As can be seen in Table 4-4, Bag NOX values were only -50-80 % of the modal NOX
values. This is attributable to a known issue with the bag analysis, where older NOX converters
were used. Actually, two different NOX converters were used over the course of the study.
However, neither one maintained its converter efficiency for very long. The second converter,
installed in the bag analysis system after the fifth test on the control vehicle, was considerably
better than the first for a short period. Phase 1 NOX values were most affected due to the longer
time available for NO conversion to NO2 (all bags were read at the end of the test). Agreement
between Phase 3 modal and bag NOX values were quite good regardless of the NOX converter
issues, which indicates that most of the NOX was originally emitted as NO. Again, however, the
primary intent of collecting bag data was to provide a back-up and cross-check to the modal data.
Modal data was collected as the primary source of emissions data, and all "by phase" emissions
presented in the report for this study are based on modal data. The cumulative by-phase MSOD
data submitted for this project is based on actual tedlar bag samples, as described in Section 5.
4-25
-------
4.3 PEMS Test Procedures
PEMS testing was conducted on all vehicles entering the program. The general PEMS
installation procedures used during the study are described in the following sections. The
various types of PEMS testing conducted during the study are described in Sections 4.3.1.4
through 4.3.1.6.
4.3.1 PEMS Installation and Testing
4.3.1.1 Installation
Prior to the installation of the PEMS, OBDII scans were performed using a handheld scan
tool, and readiness status along with pending and confirmed codes were recorded. Detailed
information about each vehicle was also collected for future reference to be used in Mobile
Source Observation Database (MSOD) table population, including vehicle make, model, model
year, odometer, vehicle identification number (VEST), engine displacement, number of cylinders,
engine and evaporative family identification numbers, transmission details, and emission control
system information. Fuel and oil samples were collected for study vehicles (unless unavailable
because of anti-siphon devices).
Once vehicle information was gathered, a warmed-up PEMS unit was installed, along
with batteries in the trunk or truck bed of the test vehicle. Two batteries were used for all
installations, to prevent system shutdown during conditioning runs and to maximize acquisition
time during the driveaway. Flame ionization detector (FID) fuel pressure was checked, and the
FID fuel bottle was replaced if under 200 PSI would be available for the conditioning run. A
new (full) fuel bottle was always installed for all driveaways. FID exhaust and drainage tubes
were connected to the PEMS unit and routed outside the vehicle. Various instruments and
sensors were then connected to the PEMS unit, including a vehicle interface (VI) cable, a
weather probe, an auxiliary thermocouple, and a Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna. A
flowmeter and matching control box were also connected to the PEMS, purged with dry
compressed nitrogen gas (flowmeter only), and powered on (all flowmeter boxes remained
powered up throughout the day to minimize warm-up time). This flowmeter was attached to the
rear of the vehicle using a common bicycle rack which had been slightly modified for use in this
study. Vehicle exhaust was routed from the tailpipe to the flowmeter through a silicon tube with
stainless-steel unions. A connection from a laptop computer to the PEMS was used to set system
parameters and configuration settings, perform audits and calibrations, and control data
acquisition.
4.3.1.2 Onsite Quality Assurance
Once the PEMS was physically installed in the test vehicle, several steps were taken to
ensure that the PEMS was in proper working order and to ensure that complete accurate test
results would be obtained. Prior to each use of the equipment, leak tests were performed for the
FID fuel and PEMS systems, internal PEMS pressures and ambient conditions were recorded,
and analyzer sample rates were verified. Once initial system checks were complete, and after full
system warm-up, the vehicle was started (for conditioning runs only). The vehicle was turned
on, allowed to slightly warm up, and the hydrocarbon reading from the road test screen was
4-26
-------
noted. This reading was used to determine the appropriate calibration range for the vehicle being
tested. The unit was recalibrated, if needed and a zero and gas audit were performed. Spans and
re-audits were performed if necessary. Additional checks were made to ensure that the
equipment was collecting data for VI, GPS, flow, emissions, and other parameters - and that
these parameters seemed reasonable upon inspection. The voltages of the two fully-charged
batteries were verified. A test session was begun after successful completion of initial system
checks, zeros, and audits. Copies of the installation checklists and data collection sheets are
included in Appendix J for reference. Complete installation guidelines (details which
supplement the installation checklists) are provided in Appendix I.
Once PEMS installation and setup was completed, a person other than the installer
(generally the onsite manager) performed a review of the installation, to verify system
parameters and confirm proper installation. A copy of this installation review checklist, along
with other onsite data quality checks that were performed, is provided in Appendix N.
After every conditioning run, vehicle emissions and fuel economy values measured
during the conditioning run were reviewed. If any suspect values were identified, the PEMS
system and installation were reviewed to try to determine the source of the problem. If the
problem was found, it was corrected (if possible), and the vehicle was given another conditioning
run. If a problem was not found, or not correctable, the suspect or faulty equipment was taken
out of service for repair. The vehicle was then outfitted with new equipment and another
conditioning run was performed.
After onsite checks of the data were performed, the raw (XML) and processed (.csv) files
were uploaded daily to the project FTP site for perusal by other project team members.
Additional checks on the data were later performed by Austin ERG staff using SAS scripting,
including confirmation of the presence of VI and flow data, verification of transport delays, test
duration, vehicle speed, and test distance, analysis of audit and calibration data, and evidence of
any system faults or warnings.
Further detail on specific PEMS QA procedures can be found in Appendix M: Off-site
data quality and results analysis queries, and Appendix N: Onsite installation and data quality
checks
4.3.1.3 PEMS Test Issues
The equipment downtime experienced during Round 1 was greatly reduced during Round
2 through the addition of an on-site PEMS repair and support person. Most repairs were minor,
such as stuck solenoids, loose or dirty contacts and fittings, water in the system, or blown relays,
and were able to be repaired quickly. Most larger repairs, such as system module and CPU
board replacements, were also accomplished onsite (after necessary repair items were received
onsite). This increase in equipment up-time allowed significantly more driveaways to be
conducted in Round 2 than were possible during Round 1 of the study.
As mentioned in Section 2.4.1 (changes from Round 1), the hot-wire anemometer-style
flowmeters used throughout the Round 1 summer portion of the study were replaced with
pressure-differential style flowmeters for Round 2 of the study. Measurements from the original
4-27
-------
hot-wire anemometer flowmeters were adversely affected by heat radiation effects at low vehicle
speeds and idle. Since convective cooling minimized these effects when vehicles were in
motion, low-speed and idle flow measurements were biased low. This bias was eliminated with
the use of pressure-differential style flowmeters provided for Round 2 of the study. These
flowmeters relied on a bank of differential pressure sensors (as opposed to a hot-wire
anemometer) in order to determine corrected mass exhaust flowrates. However, the orifices in
the differential pressure sensors used in these new flowmeters were susceptible to PM clogging
and moisture freezing. This condition was minimized as much as possible by thoroughly
purging all orifices with high-pressure dry compressed nitrogen prior to each use, and by
maintaining the flowmeters and tubing assemblies in above-freezing conditions.
Earlier in the study, problems were encountered with preventing moisture and exhaust
fumes from entering vehicles during testing. The new flowmeters required additional tubing to
be routed out of the trunk (generally requiring the trunk to be propped open wider). Standard
household pipe insulation purchased at a hardware store was found to fairly effectively seal
trunks. Carbon monoxide detectors were used to ensure vehicle exhaust was not entering the
passenger compartment.
As mentioned in Section 2.4.1, Round 2 testing was conducted during the winter, as
opposed to the Round 1 summer study. Operation of the PEMS units below freezing
temperatures was occasionally necessary, and proved to be problematic because of water
freezing in system components and measurement drift. Battery life seemed greatly reduced
during Round 2 testing, perhaps due to battery cycle fatigue (these were the original batteries
used since the start of the study) and also possibly due to operation in the cold temperatures.
In order to prevent trunks from inadvertently popping open, as would occasionally
happen with the original vice-grip-devised trunk latches, heavy-duty zip-ties were used (with
metal rings installed in the trunk latch assembly) to secure trunks. These zip ties, which are
typically used for securing building ventilation and may be found at a typical hardware store,
also prevented motorists from tampering with the PEMS units installed in trunks during
driveaway tests.
Experience gained during Round 1 of the study helped streamline Round 2 testing. For
example, installation procedures and sequences were modified in order to minimize lost time in
the event of equipment malfunctions. Certain "tricks" and procedures for equipment software
helped expedite installations and minimize system resets. The incorporation of a session
manager into the host software also allowed consolidation of audit and test information into one
test file, thereby expediting equipment setup and reducing time needed for test processing and
analysis.
4.3.1.4 Conditioning Testing
PEMS units were installed to determine emissions and fuel economy on conditioning
runs performed prior to dynamometer testing. After the installation and QC procedures were
completed, the flowmeter installation was photographed, and the vehicle was driven on a
"conditioning" route (similar in speed, acceleration, and distance to the LA-92 test). This
conditioning drive allowed emissions and mileage data to be gathered on all vehicles driven in a
4-28
-------
consistent manner, and it also allowed all vehicles to be similarly conditioned prior to
dynamometer testing. After the conditioning run was completed, a host laptop was connected to
the PEMS and the vehicle's fuel economy over the conditioning drive was calculated by using
cumulative grams/mile emissions estimates derived from the conditioning run segment of the test
record. If the fuel economy estimate from the conditioning run seemed reasonable, the test was
stopped, and a post-test audit and zero were performed to help gather information on instrument
drift that may have occurred during the conditioning drive. If the fuel economy and/or emissions
determined from the conditioning run were not reasonable, the problem was investigated and
corrected as described in Section 4.3.1.2.
The overall travel distance for the standard conditioning run was approximately 8 miles
over approximately 1300 seconds. Figure 4-10 shows a sample speed and acceleration plot for a
typical conditioning run. The speed and acceleration profile for the drive is shown in Figure 4-
11.
Speed - Acceleration DUrlbukn
Example OoncHonhg Cycle
o/n
0.20
26 30 35 40
Speed (mph)
r / // 0.02
V////////A OJSO
005
1.00
0.10
ZOO
/pfcjMOTH!«Clty/AnalyBlB/FknjndVSimPred_Dyno«a 26JUL06 1MB
Figure 4-10. Sample Speed Trace for a Dynamometer Conditioning Run
4-29
-------
Speed-Dace
Beunpte OondHonhg Cycle
100
95
90
65
BO
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
26
20
15
10
6
0
15
10
5
0
-6
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
100200300400500600700
900 1000 HOO 1200 1300
Time (sees)
Figure 4-11. Sample Speed-Acceleration Distribution for A Dynamometer
Conditioning Run
On occasion, some vehicles could not be tested on the dynamometer for various reasons.
Some examples of untestable vehicles include those with four-wheel drive, certain exhaust leaks,
rough running/stalling, tailpipe rust, transmission problems, or vehicles that were too large for
the dynamometer to handle. For these vehicles, conditioning runs were still performed, but an
extended conditioning route (approximately 18 miles) was used for the run. Details of the
"standard" 8 mile conditioning route and also of this "extended" conditioning route are provided
in Appendix K. Details pertaining to all conditioning runs are provided in Appendix K.
4. 3. 1. 5 Drive-Away Testing
In addition to conditioning and dynamometer testing, some program participants were
solicited for "driveaway" testing. This involved installing a PEMS unit on the participant's
vehicle, driving the vehicle on the conditioning run, and then releasing the vehicle to the
participant (after conditioning run fuel economy and emissions were reviewed, and the setup was
independently verified). This conditioning drive allowed emissions and mileage data to be
gathered on all vehicles driven in a consistent manner, and it also allowed all vehicles to be
similarly conditioned prior to release to the owners. In order to maximize battery life, power
supplies were connected to the PEMS units and batteries during troubleshooting and while
waiting for motorists to return to pick up their driveaway test vehicles. Immediately before
releasing the vehicle to the motorist for the driveaway test, the vehicle's trunk or hatch was
sealed with standard household pipe insulation to prevent vehicle exhaust or moisture from
entering the vehicle.
Prior to vehicle release, the participant was encouraged to drive the vehicle as much as
possible (i.e., by running their weekly errands), and to drive the vehicle as they normally would.
This allowed activity, emissions, and fuel economy information to be gathered under "real-
world" on-road driving conditions. The PEMS unit continued to operate until the battery supply
4-30
-------
was depleted, typically 6 to 8 hours of operation. The flame ionization detector used for total
hydrocarbon (THC) measurements continued to operate until the PEMS shut down or until FID
fuel was depleted, resulting in a loss of THC measurements. Although a THC measurement loss
could result in a slight error in fuel economy and THC emission values, this was generally not
the case since FID shutdown usually occurred long after the vehicle was parked for the day.
Participants were generally scheduled to return the following day in order to have the
PEMS unit removed. Upon their return, they were interviewed about their driving experience
and also provided information on passenger pick-ups and drop-offs and any other significant
driving events that occurred during testing. Vehicle miles traveled for driveaway runs varied
from 13 miles to 66 miles, and the total number of recorded seconds also ranged from 576
seconds to 38,000 seconds.
Although eight PEMS units were provided for Round 1 of the study, equipment
malfunctions generally prevented concurrent use of all eight units. This reduced the number of
drive-away tests that could be performed during Round 1. Onsite PEMS repair and maintenance
support provided during Round 2 greatly reduced equipment downtime, and allowed a
significantly higher number of driveaway tests to be conducted.
4.3.1.6 PEMS Testing Concurrent with Dynamometer Testing
PEMS testing was performed in tandem with dynamometer testing, to provide
dynamometer vs. PEMS comparative results. Some notable differences between use of the
PEMS for dynamometer testing vs. in-vehicle testing (such as conditioning run and driveaway
testing) include:
• Rather than exhausting to the environment, the PEMS' flowmeter/sample line
assembly was attached directly to the vehicle's exhaust, after which the vehicle's
exhaust was routed through the dynamometer's transfer tube to the CVS tunnel.
The exhaust sample was drawn from the PEMS's sample port and flow meter tube
into the transition tube feeding the dynamometer's CVS.
• Since the vehicle was stationary on the dynamometer, no GPS signal was
collected
• An analog voltage signal proportional to dynamometer roller speed (ratio of 0.1
volt = 1 mph) was acquired through external analog input 3. For certain Round 1
tests, speed from external analog input 3 needed to be adjusted by a factor of 10
(tests 84242 - 84392). For still other Round 1 tests, the external analog input 3
was not usable because the voltage signal was found to be erratic during data
analysis; in these cases (tests 84153 - 84241) the actual dynamometer speed as
recorded by BKI was used. For the remainder of the Round 1 tests, as well as all
tests in Round 2, the external analog input 3 signal was found to be accurate.
Adjustment of speeds was performed during post-processing and QA of the data
using SAS.
• An external event marker switch was used to indicate the start of a run, and also
to distinguish between test Phases. However, for accuracy purposes, test-phase
delineation was based on test timing rather than manually inserted markers during
data analysis.
4-31
-------
Full quality control procedures, as described above in 4.3.1.2, were performed
during PEMS/dynamometer testing, including leak checks, zeros, audits, and
spans/reaudits as necessary. Emission readings derived from the conditioning
testing previously performed were used to determine which concentration
calibration gas should be used to calibrate the PEMS unit prior to vehicle testing.
4-32
-------
4.4 Regulated Emissions Measurement Results
PEMS sampling was performed concurrently with all dynamometer testing. By-phase
and total composite emission rates as measured using each system (PEMS / dynamometer) were
then calculated and are presented in the following section. These results are based on time-
aligned test data to which the necessary corrections (humidity, dilution, and flow) have been
applied.
For each system, phase-specific grams/mile emission rates were calculated by dividing
the total phase emissions by the distance the vehicle traveled during that phase. For all
calculations, mileage was that as measured by the rear dynamometer rollers. Composite
emission rates for the entire run were calculated using the following formula:
C = 0.43
P oil + Poll
DI + D2
-0.57
Pol2 + Pol3
D2 + D3
Where:
C = Composite emission rate for the run (grams/mile)
Poll = Total pollutant (HC, CO, CO2, NOX or PM2 5) emissions for phase 1 (grams/mg)
Pol2 = Total pollutant (HC, CO, CO2, NOX or PM2.5) emissions for phase 2 (grams/mg)
Pol3 = Total pollutant (HC, CO, CO2, NOX, or PM2.5) emissions for phase 3 (grams/mg)
Dl = Phase 1 distance traveled (miles)
D2 = Phase 2 distance traveled (miles)
D3 = Phase 3 distance traveled (miles)
4.4.1 Summary of Round 1 Regulated Emissions Measurements
288 dynamometer tests were conducted from July 12, 2004 through October 2, 2004. 47
tests were performed using the new pitot-tube flowmeter, and 241 tests were performed with the
hot-wire anemometer flowmeter. Table 4-8 provides a side-by-side comparison of Round 1
PEMS vs. dynamometer composite results aggregated from second-by-second (SBS) data. The
PEMS data was obtained using the hot-wire anemometer. Control vehicle test results are not
included in Table 4-8. The dynamometer test results are based on speed and emissions time-
aligned second-by-second data, integrated for each phase. The PEMS test results were
calculated by using speed and emissions time-alignment methodology developed by Sensors,
Inc. Although EPA staff identified some incorrect flow rate readings as measured by the PEMS
hot-wire anemometer flowmeters, the data presented in Table 4-8 are based on emission rate
calculations corrected for these flow inaccuracies.
4-33
-------
Table 4-8. By-Test Comparison of Round 1 PEMS vs. Dynamometer Composite Results
RunID
84032
84034
84035
84036
84037
84039
84042
84043
84047
84048
84050
84051
84052
84054
84055
84056
84057
84058
84060
84061
84062
84063
84064
84066
£
1
H
82.3
84.1
85.6
80.5
83.2
79.5
76.0
77.5
79.9
83.2
82.0
84.0
89.1
94.1
95.8
85.4
85.9
87.3
90.3
91.5
83.9
85.3
84.7
87.4
g
55.9
59.4
58.1
65.7
58.5
79.7
75.6
70.5
66.2
63.9
80.3
71.8
60.0
47.5
50.1
70.3
69.2
65.2
63.8
57.7
80.3
72.5
72.3
66.1
Composite HC (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
0.05
0.1
0.26
0.2
2.18
0.17
0.32
0.63
0.12
0.95
0.07
0.17
0.48
0.19
1.1
0.1
0.51
0.12
0.1
0.59
0.07
0.13
0.27
1.12
0
>>
P
0.12
0.12
0.29
0.2
1.55
0.22
0.31
0.57
0.14
1.1
0.08
0.18
0.47
0.21
1.06
0.1
0.51
0.13
0.1
0.53
0.07
0.13
0.28
0.46
te
P
S
62.14
15.75
11.34
2.59
40.93
22.77
2.08
11.74
16.4
13.26
7.8
4.48
3.12
7.45
3.37
0.79
1.8
10.7
0.5
10.71
5.39
0.83
2
142.77
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
0.49
3.12
4.84
7.48
54
2.42
5.54
12.34
1
9.77
3.35
5.25
6.28
3.16
11.62
3.86
16.55
0.97
1.11
5.9
0.71
0.71
4.1
27.96
0
^»
0
0.43
2.15
3.47
6.64
32.34
2.05
4.74
10.41
0.87
9.04
2.88
5.15
5.22
2.83
9.7
3.43
16.17
0.92
1
4.87
0.64
0.78
3.36
15.44
te
P
S
12.9
45.04
39.47
12.7
66.98
17.72
17.02
18.57
15.61
8.1
16.55
1.92
20.17
11.69
19.79
12.43
2.34
5.39
10.46
21.29
11.19
9.57
22.28
81.07
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
0.09
0.54
0.58
1.64
1.86
0.23
0.67
2.43
0.07
3.36
0.07
0.83
2.13
1.17
5
0.31
0.1
0.29
0.96
1.11
0.86
0.54
1.23
0.59
0
>3
P
0.1
0.46
0.51
1.63
1.25
0.18
0.63
2.31
0.07
3.41
0.06
0.86
2.1
1.1
4.13
0.3
0.09
0.33
0.93
1.06
0.92
0.55
1.27
0.37
te
b
S
8.1
17.11
12.41
1.07
48.88
31.51
6.23
5.14
0.31
1.35
30.9
3.59
1.38
5.74
20.92
5.07
6.16
10.84
3.1
4.17
6.37
1.53
2.51
58.1
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
358.89
553.22
829.64
343.57
999.49
687.53
322.05
328.11
426.67
404.66
422.82
340.36
496.24
520.38
598.08
532.78
274.9
453.18
454.28
408.73
442.69
310.08
426.96
672.38
0
^»
0
359.64
502.92
697.48
347.55
659.41
668.97
318.2
288.37
437.27
419.55
365.13
359.84
457.68
507.74
504.1
531.17
280.47
459.34
472.34
350.69
479.74
340.02
441.66
434.73
te
b
S
0.21
10
18.95
1.15
51.57
2.77
1.21
13.78
2.42
3.55
15.8
5.42
8.42
2.49
18.64
0.3
1.99
1.34
3.82
16.55
7.72
8.8
3.33
54.66
1
IT)
fS
%
a.
2.667
2.735
5.943
1.861
9.205
2.705
2.717
3.551
1.735
60.070
1.589
0.580
5.563
2.641
4.883
1.468
1.213
1.123
1.080
1.573
2.144
6.465
PEMS DATASuspect
X
X
X
Dyno DATASuspect
X
4-34
-------
RunID
84067
84068
84069
84071
84072
84073
84074
84076
84077
84078
84079
84082
84083
84084
84086
84087
84088
84090
84091
84092
84093
84094
84096
84097
84098
84099
§
8.
1
87.8
76.7
76.8
77.2
64.7
62.4
60.2
61.1
66.6
70.4
74.1
71.9
76.1
78.0
73.7
77.4
80.1
83.1
82.9
73.9
75.7
78.0
78.6
69.9
70.8
73.4
g
65.0
88.6
84.1
84.5
92.0
84.5
88.5
92.3
85.0
70.3
61.9
53.0
42.5
38.4
49.4
44.1
40.8
40.5
43.9
58.1
51.1
47.1
45.7
65.0
63.5
57.6
Composite HC (g/mi)
>
P
0.44
0.11
0.21
2.23
0.1
0.39
0.36
4.7
0.07
0.12
1.86
0.06
0.09
0.12
0.1
0.11
0.23
0.13
0.28
0.07
0.19
0.3
1.04
0.08
0.16
0.32
te
p
S
9.02
12.8
8.53
18.02
22.2
2.49
44.49
5.03
10.87
3.12
39.81
9.09
1.94
9.68
1.81
7.06
7.24
15.49
8.13
19.16
21.33
6.74
8.92
20.46
1.04
5.93
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
5.99
2.42
1.56
14.42
0.63
5.93
18.22
66.23
3.24
2.27
101.49
0.55
2.89
1.07
1.36
1.26
2.23
1.31
5.61
0.54
1.54
9.66
10.44
0.31
1.61
1.85
o
=
^»
0
5.51
1.97
1.44
11.21
0.54
6.07
12.17
67.86
3.17
2.75
63.78
0.44
3.12
1.02
1.33
1.11
2.32
1.21
5.52
0.5
1.5
8.4
10.25
0.2
1.38
1.74
la
p
S
8.74
22.77
8.32
28.6
15.42
2.31
49.77
2.4
2.26
17.45
59.11
23.56
7.35
4.93
2.29
13.23
3.99
8.47
1.59
6.86
2.46
14.93
1.87
57.76
16.51
6.45
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
1.48
0.29
0.63
3.68
0.19
1.42
6.12
3.87
0.19
0.31
1.64
0.11
0.2
0.74
0.1
0.4
1.35
0.36
0.84
0.97
0.68
2.47
1.89
0.09
0.41
0.42
o
=
^»
0
1.58
0.32
0.68
5.29
0.19
1.44
4.52
3.34
0.2
0.31
0.98
0.11
0.18
0.65
0.11
0.35
0.53
0.35
0.72
0.88
0.6
1.89
1.62
0.09
0.36
0.38
la
p
S
6.15
10.11
6.85
30.48
0.17
1.1
35.26
15.68
7.11
0.81
67.65
0.15
12.17
14.28
7.94
13
152.28
3.65
17.69
10.15
14.23
31.06
16.79
0.47
13.31
10.93
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
425.97
440.7
408.86
410.91
494.59
439.84
512.97
515.34
252.5
353.85
675.47
446.18
365.09
396.86
535.43
382.21
413
458.94
521.32
285.43
334.93
522.59
507.19
429.7
468.78
376.14
o
=
^»
0
443.94
463.2
444.44
340
512.39
455.74
388.82
474.27
263.19
380.25
368.01
456.78
366.75
413.29
505.9
394.33
446.05
467.92
519.31
313.93
366.35
510.49
486.87
435.3
483.86
411.83
la
p
S
4.05
4.86
8
20.86
3.47
3.49
31.93
8.66
4.06
6.94
83.55
2.32
0.45
3.98
5.84
3.07
7.41
1.92
0.39
9.08
8.58
2.37
4.17
1.29
3.12
8.67
1
"1
r4
s
a.
1.944
0.404
0.566
38.519
1.614
3.083
6.481
16.155
0.905
0.554
32.506
1.068
0.850
0.711
2.760
1.757
1.304
0.693
1.053
1.452
1.327
2.055
5.146
0.809
0.603
3.350
PEMS DATASuspect
X
Dyno DATASuspect
X
4-35
-------
RunID
84101
84102
84103
84104
84105
84107
84108
84109
84110
84111
84115
84116
84119
84121
84122
84123
84126
84128
84129
84131
84132
84133
84134
84135
84137
84140
§
8.
1
77.4
80.8
74.6
78.1
81.1
86.0
87.6
83.0
84.7
88.4
84.0
87.6
91.9
82.9
83.3
85.1
80.5
73.5
75.4
79.4
80.3
68.8
72.9
75.2
76.9
75.1
g
49.9
44.5
60.7
55.7
51.7
39.4
38.7
59.1
56.8
51.6
57.1
49.5
44.5
60.0
57.5
56.2
61.7
47.6
45.2
38.8
38.3
53.0
43.6
38.3
34.9
44.9
Composite HC (g/mi)
>
P
0.55
0.19
0.17
0.18
0.32
0.27
0.64
0.17
0.19
0.17
0.23
0.2
1.83
0.08
0.17
0.91
0.84
0.24
0.24
0.15
1.08
0.15
0.28
0.43
1.04
0.09
te
p
S
1.79
4.99
7.42
3.6
2.72
6.89
5.63
6.63
4.23
4.52
6.39
5.12
14.18
20.56
13.89
6.5
7.51
2.22
11.63
7.94
8.73
2.19
12.29
7.05
61.57
13.19
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
26.29
7.23
1.08
2.16
4.77
4.06
14.14
2.07
5.31
2.57
7.84
2.94
13.25
0.5
1.25
26.57
10.08
2.74
3.12
4.41
12.24
1.25
9.34
4.7
4.17
1.02
o
=
^»
0
22.72
7.13
1
2.16
4.36
3.78
12.21
1.96
5.04
2.33
5.92
2.43
13.96
0.39
1.31
25.94
11.56
3.03
3.27
3.73
11.43
1.25
8.29
5.02
10.16
1.01
la
p
S
15.69
1.4
7.8
0.01
9.47
7.31
15.81
5.52
5.19
10.15
32.56
21.27
5.12
27.73
4.69
2.42
12.88
9.81
4.73
18.33
7.08
0.42
12.66
6.4
58.92
1.01
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
2.58
0.67
0.56
0.86
0.59
0.86
3.15
0.88
0.63
1.06
0.58
0.77
5.67
0.06
0.35
1.02
1.53
0.41
0.38
0.55
2.3
0.3
1.66
0.59
0.58
0.23
o
=
^»
0
2.16
0.59
0.48
0.71
0.54
0.73
2.65
0.75
0.58
0.91
0.7
0.91
5.7
0.08
0.34
1.04
1.73
0.45
0.43
0.59
2.47
0.35
1.61
0.57
2.37
0.21
la
p
S
19.71
13.13
16.35
20.27
8.46
17.14
18.8
18.46
7.96
16.6
17.92
15.94
0.67
15.37
3.1
1.93
11.35
9.4
12.78
7.26
6.87
12.62
2.72
4.34
75.53
6.14
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
380.55
246.24
423.43
470.87
286.23
454.52
349.93
468.47
346.26
449.39
361.49
464.24
504.9
453.09
469.83
264.32
505.74
399.38
368.91
361.6
460.73
438.83
525.48
352.89
176.3
460.13
o
=
^»
0
381.24
252.93
424.34
490.8
300.67
451.4
323.96
475.23
349
464.32
362.39
465.33
506.36
454.15
470.91
264.99
507.19
400.4
369.72
362.3
461.58
439.81
519.88
386.86
463.33
505.35
la
p
S
0.18
2.64
0.22
4.06
4.8
0.69
8.01
1.42
0.78
3.22
0.25
0.24
0.29
0.23
0.23
0.25
0.29
0.25
0.22
0.19
0.18
0.22
1.08
8.78
61.95
8.95
1
"1
r4
s
a.
10.186
0.717
0.459
1.640
1.264
3.963
10.088
4.147
0.718
1.847
2.971
4.448
2.529
2.209
4.399
0.901
2.051
2.257
PEMS DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dyno DATASuspect
X
X
4-36
-------
RunID
84145
84146
84148
84149
84150
84151
84153
84154
84156
84157
84160
84161
84162
84164
84165
84166
84168
84169
84171
84172
84173
84174
84175
84178
84179
84180
§
8.
1
79.2
82.4
83.8
69.6
68.3
69.4
76.0
78.4
65.4
65.9
62.0
65.4
67.3
70.8
71.6
71.5
70.1
70.7
70.8
73.0
65.2
66.9
70.1
68.7
72.9
74.6
g
49.2
46.6
43.5
49.4
48.5
46.8
38.1
33.7
59.4
54.5
56.0
52.9
41.7
36.6
37.5
39.2
46.7
44.0
44.8
39.6
57.5
54.6
47.8
54.4
43.5
44.4
Composite HC (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
1.12
1.51
1.91
0.07
0.16
0.08
0.11
23.02
0.11
0.49
0.13
0.23
0.65
0.18
3.57
0.36
0.12
0.26
2.77
0.39
0.45
0.36
1.31
0.22
0.48
1.32
o
>>
P
1.15
1.18
1.16
0.08
0.16
0.09
0.12
12.04
0.11
0.46
0.12
0.25
0.47
0.19
3.39
0.34
0.14
0.27
1.18
0.45
0.47
0.37
1.26
0.23
0.49
1.33
te
p
S
2.78
28.04
64.14
15.79
1.45
11.95
5.19
91.22
3.82
6.23
0.77
4.17
38.08
3.14
5.25
5.63
14.74
4.8
134.28
13.06
4.29
2.69
4.34
2.79
1.71
1.24
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
14.79
12.94
17.53
0.71
4.6
1.92
0.83
177.32
4.96
6.19
2.29
0.99
27.86
1.54
14.02
7.82
2.11
6.02
29.06
6.75
5.38
2.16
8.27
2.96
7.4
10.27
o
=
^»
0
13.71
9.78
7.67
0.71
4.44
3.32
0.66
112.41
4.64
5.64
2.07
0.98
23.98
1.46
12.96
7.07
1.97
4.8
14.79
5.72
5.18
1.65
7.75
2.67
6.67
9.09
la
p
S
7.86
32.24
128.7
0.26
3.59
42.29
25.32
57.75
6.91
9.86
10.72
0.43
16.2
5.88
8.11
10.63
6.92
25.56
96.46
18.14
3.74
31.23
6.76
10.79
10.93
12.97
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
2.39
1.97
4.42
0.07
0.38
0.21
0.49
6.65
0.24
0.8
0.39
0.75
1.34
0.27
4.75
1.35
0.76
1.1
2.09
0.78
1.16
1.54
2.05
0.65
1.57
2.34
o
=
^»
0
2.07
1.62
3.43
0.09
0.37
0.21
0.4
4.58
0.22
0.82
0.35
0.78
0.81
0.26
4.4
1.24
0.78
1.28
1.37
0.93
1.12
1.29
1.71
0.61
1.28
2
la
p
S
15.48
21.4
28.97
19.64
2.67
1.84
22.15
45.36
9.73
3.29
14.23
4.59
65.95
1.46
7.82
8.26
2.48
14.48
52.59
16.32
3.38
19.17
19.83
7.03
23.06
17.34
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
281.88
453.86
533.7
293.88
511.06
373.98
573.64
932.19
361.58
281.97
394.08
478.11
711.57
408.6
323.41
431.62
445.32
424.72
451.7
472.75
357.56
538.76
460.86
363.72
509.54
461.23
o
=
^»
0
279.58
376.33
429.21
341.68
511.43
399.82
569.86
563.62
393.14
297.23
382.2
479.84
422.92
454.16
313.81
435.04
446.85
426.15
277.37
428.61
376.71
532
446.42
396.68
498.51
465.02
la
p
S
0.82
20.6
24.35
13.99
0.07
6.46
0.66
65.39
8.03
5.13
3.11
0.36
68.25
10.03
3.06
0.78
0.34
0.33
62.85
10.3
5.08
1.27
3.23
8.31
2.21
0.82
1
"1
r4
s
a.
1.344
46.326
0.959
4.786
6.948
80.266
2.989
0.669
6.567
25.586
19.417
0.690
40.870
13.510
3.696
1.165
1.972
9.349
PEMS DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dyno DATASuspect
X
X
4-37
-------
RunID
84182
84183
84184
84185
84188
84189
84191
84192
84193
84195
84196
84197
84198
84200
84201
84205
84206
84208
84209
84210
84211
84213
84214
84215
84242
84244
§
8.
1
76.7
74.8
77.6
80.5
80.2
84.4
68.4
68.7
68.9
70.2
68.0
64.3
65.8
65.2
65.0
75.1
75.2
75.7
71.7
71.3
71.9
75.7
78.6
79.8
79.2
80.8
g
45.1
58.9
53.1
50.6
45.7
41.4
45.9
45.6
45.0
44.1
51.4
66.6
63.2
68.8
67.6
68.8
67.1
66.8
71.1
69.7
69.1
54.3
61.5
58.5
10.4
45.4
Composite HC (g/mi)
>
P
0.47
0.14
0.15
0.36
4.67
18.42
0.22
0.07
0.1
0.13
2.06
0.35
0.42
0.48
5.66
0.14
0.8
2.21
0.52
0.82
0.46
0.59
0.15
0.19
0.25
1.56
te
p
S
53.35
5.73
7.12
3.75
42.96
87.79
46.45
35.64
13.08
36.08
40.51
9.46
2.91
3.51
5.24
4.07
8.76
1.11
6.43
14.17
3.6
14.07
67.84
48.08
38.71
38.78
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
20.37
1.89
8.19
5.31
86.71
252.9
2.32
1.1
3.52
1.1
15.75
6.51
4.07
5.45
72.76
4.38
13.89
31.08
11.52
12.51
11.18
31.47
2.09
2.46
1.37
23.32
o
=
^»
0
12.04
1.54
7.05
4.85
65.36
198.38
2.11
1.09
2.97
1
14.98
6.51
4.92
6.26
78.19
3.49
13.02
28.44
12.33
11.52
9.59
23.22
1.92
2.03
1.34
20.15
la
p
S
69.1
22.3
16.2
9.42
32.66
27.48
9.72
1.34
18.87
10.13
5.15
0.04
17.18
12.82
6.94
25.59
6.65
9.28
6.55
8.56
16.52
35.57
8.58
21.23
2.3
15.7
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
2.55
0.57
0.13
0.78
2.69
1.98
0.38
0.21
0.56
0.51
3.5
2.09
0.58
0.67
3.97
0.77
0.89
4.68
4.41
3.24
1.22
1.25
0.85
0.84
0.62
3.09
o
=
^»
0
1.4
0.59
0.11
0.68
2.1
1.51
0.38
0.19
0.56
0.4
3.03
2.07
0.58
0.66
3.47
0.56
0.65
3.9
3.77
2.87
1.04
0.97
0.63
0.63
0.43
2.98
la
p
S
82.37
3.95
23.91
15.72
27.66
31.4
1.28
7.05
0.21
28.1
15.73
1
1.46
1.89
14.3
38.59
37.54
20.15
17.09
12.82
17.35
28.56
34.34
33.49
44.75
3.82
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
900.91
297.19
303.94
299.76
626.1
429.35
351.62
460.46
405.09
407.91
485.34
360.07
289.04
294.91
433.29
610.43
576.25
513
401.39
340.46
431.67
564.77
479.04
440.71
425.81
365.96
o
=
^»
0
562.68
332.35
320.72
309.48
499.83
347.12
379.88
502.92
434.16
448.15
475.38
420.63
346.82
355.58
413.92
601.46
574.84
500.58
404.63
338.87
416.66
551.42
490.94
450.1
452.08
327.95
la
p
S
60.11
10.58
5.23
3.14
25.26
23.69
7.44
8.44
6.7
8.98
2.09
14.4
16.66
17.06
4.68
1.49
0.25
2.48
0.8
0.47
3.6
2.42
2.42
2.09
5.81
11.59
1
"1
r4
s
a.
12.074
1.944
3.319
40.325
287.856
2.254
5.243
5.842
0.572
8.027
0.969
2.165
12.512
8.527
1.392
54.502
12.448
31.956
6.098
6.799
3.811
22.176
PEMS DATASuspect
X
Dyno DATASuspect
X
X
4-38
-------
RunID
84245
84246
84250
84252
84253
84256
84257
84258
84261
84262
84263
84265
84266
84267
84268
84270
84271
84272
84274
84276
84277
84278
84279
84280
84281
84283
§
8.
1
81.8
74.7
81.1
75.1
77.7
81.7
82.1
70.8
66.0
71.8
74.5
78.4
72.3
74.3
76.7
79.6
81.5
72.3
74.4
78.7
79.3
79.9
77.1
78.9
80.5
82.8
g
24.3
49.7
46.2
34.4
35.8
36.9
37.1
1.5
65.7
50.2
41.8
37.2
54.8
47.5
39.8
30.6
30.2
65.2
49.6
33.8
30.4
33.7
47.2
44.4
38.7
37.2
Composite HC (g/mi)
>
P
2.97
0.73
2.93
0.16
0.21
0.42
0.55
0.29
1.22
0.44
1.2
11.11
0.09
0.34
0.72
0.94
1.28
0.08
0.5
0.21
14.49
0.57
0.11
0.08
0.47
5.75
te
p
S
61.82
20.6
67.72
24.56
33.92
45.76
27.24
9.59
29
35.04
28.65
91.69
37.52
27.99
31.29
25.05
32.45
1.08
7.01
0.92
34.62
7.23
18.12
3
4.09
35.46
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
26.69
12.84
33.67
1.33
5.88
9.99
6.47
3.96
11.1
9.32
52.41
57.84
0.4
5.95
3.31
12.16
13.26
1.03
8.24
2.67
304.96
11.29
5.48
3.34
12.69
106.71
o
=
^»
0
18.05
10.54
27.26
1.24
5.04
8.86
5.69
4.23
11.69
8.32
42.59
132.78
0.3
5.56
2.72
11.1
11.8
1.14
7.29
2.48
149.22
10.73
4.02
2.93
11.12
78.62
la
p
S
47.81
21.79
23.51
7.77
16.59
12.77
13.76
6.46
4.99
11.97
23.04
56.43
34.39
6.85
21.6
9.56
12.31
9.7
13.03
7.48
104.37
5.18
36.29
13.81
14.12
35.74
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
3.44
1.68
2.68
0.11
1.08
1.54
2.56
2.04
1.93
1.8
2.68
0.73
0.13
1.28
4.59
1.89
9.17
0.08
2.14
1.38
1.19
0.74
0.2
0.7
1.56
2.41
o
=
^»
0
2.13
1.21
2.57
0.06
0.92
1.44
2.19
1.49
2
1.57
2.58
1.23
0.14
1.19
3.81
1.71
7.51
0.08
1.87
1.12
1.02
0.63
0.18
0.65
1.22
1.65
la
p
S
61.27
38.9
4.44
88.23
17.17
7.5
17.01
36.95
3.6
14.46
3.75
40.73
7.02
7.27
20.52
10.38
22.18
2.01
14.07
22.71
16.46
18.02
12.26
7.68
28.34
46.12
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
576.97
505.35
342.18
462.3
451.6
432.05
476.04
458.31
154.42
463.88
387.27
320.45
320.85
367.62
629.69
504.6
540.77
409.29
292.09
474.2
507.06
440.4
443.29
305.53
713.07
663.41
o
=
^»
0
382.58
493.75
316.52
467.93
444.32
445.46
464.02
483.61
170.06
486.53
396.37
515.74
359.95
374.95
586.28
497.67
505.67
424.22
305.88
465.55
265.49
424.36
467.22
314.33
653.66
429.87
la
p
S
50.81
2.35
8.11
1.2
1.64
3.01
2.59
5.23
9.19
4.66
2.3
37.87
10.86
1.96
7.41
1.39
6.94
3.52
4.51
1.86
90.99
3.78
5.12
2.8
9.09
54.33
1
"1
r4
s
a.
48.725
23.560
10.171
6.269
4.880
9.607
19.701
153.506
2.271
3.600
25.712
24.542
5.753
1.957
5.607
1.967
260.854
11.551
4.789
1.076
9.896
73.083
PEMS DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
Dyno DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
4-39
-------
RunID
84284
84285
84286
84287
84289
84291
84292
84293
84295
84296
84297
84298
84300
84301
84302
84303
84304
84305
84307
84308
84309
84310
84311
84312
84314
84315
§
8.
1
83.9
79.2
80.7
83.5
86.7
80.4
80.8
79.7
79.5
68.1
70.9
74.0
77.1
78.1
79.1
65.1
71.2
74.2
76.8
77.4
78.2
73.6
74.0
74.3
80.6
83.4
g
35.6
56.1
53.0
49.8
41.2
56.4
56.9
61.8
59.8
64.6
50.9
44.2
33.1
31.3
32.1
63.6
47.3
42.5
41.1
42.3
42.1
63.3
62.2
61.1
48.3
46.4
Composite HC (g/mi)
>
P
1.31
0.13
0.23
0.64
4.96
0.28
0.28
1.1
4
0.09
0.36
0.23
0.18
3.35
0.53
0.07
0.05
0.13
0.22
0.27
9.21
0.07
0.39
0.22
0.69
0.99
te
p
S
12.04
11.01
11.64
87.61
14.21
23.67
4.11
12.43
102.05
16.5
2.48
10.94
5.17
52.57
6.83
21.51
25.73
5.26
8.96
6.61
29.91
27.48
9.02
4.73
13.99
11.19
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
40.52
5.94
5.43
12.12
79.72
3.54
10.1
11.93
50.87
3.64
9.17
10.17
1.96
58.69
6.81
0.88
1.17
1.72
3.81
8.39
234.68
1.05
11.17
7.96
23.95
7.13
o
=
^»
0
29.33
5.7
5.15
7.57
69.04
4.34
7.53
10.07
44.74
3.66
8.5
7.55
1.88
31.8
6.14
0.75
1.07
1.7
3.6
8.04
173.08
0.82
11.45
7.76
18.81
6.7
la
p
S
38.13
4.24
5.41
60.15
15.46
18.47
34.16
18.53
13.71
0.37
7.9
34.72
4.32
84.53
10.94
16.98
8.75
1.1
5.71
4.39
35.59
27.29
2.46
2.63
27.31
6.41
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
5.71
0.12
2.72
2.67
5.56
0.35
0.95
3.11
3.34
0.07
0.86
1.15
0.42
2.7
2.16
0.32
0.15
0.58
0.6
2.32
2.44
0.3
1.13
2.32
2.88
2.21
o
=
^»
0
4.58
0.14
2.21
1.55
4.96
0.36
0.76
2.55
2.54
0.08
0.86
0.39
1.66
1.9
0.25
0.15
0.52
0.6
2.04
2.14
0.22
1.13
2
2.38
1.93
la
p
S
24.63
11.81
23.1
72.17
12.17
1.1
24.53
22.24
31.42
3.26
33.52
7.68
62.71
13.65
30.28
3.37
10.08
0.31
13.88
14.08
34.41
0.58
16.06
21.11
14.38
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
556.28
295.44
547.65
721.21
514.29
228.46
432.66
475.82
562.93
257.72
410.81
900.28
456.95
822.24
573.72
581.99
311.6
403.45
385.04
405.69
690.72
636.26
277.29
402.17
385.99
357.28
o
=
^»
0
516.67
337.93
531.74
488.37
456.03
283.81
411.99
408.26
498.48
276.26
387.82
694.88
459.54
467.13
535.35
516.09
328.26
409.78
392.86
409.38
502.38
530.59
331.19
404.4
360.73
369.35
la
p
S
7.67
12.57
2.99
47.68
12.77
19.5
5.02
16.55
12.93
6.71
5.93
29.56
0.56
76.02
7.17
12.77
5.08
1.55
1.99
0.9
37.49
19.92
16.27
0.55
7
3.27
1
"1
r4
s
a.
72.460
2.000
2.888
48.349
163.729
5.454
11.424
6.235
58.905
3.077
1.762
27.060
1.305
9.748
7.079
2.529
2.158
1.305
1.710
4.001
43.598
5.962
9.175
3.767
60.851
PEMS DATASuspect
X
X
X
Dyno DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
4-40
-------
RunID
84316
84318
84319
84321
84322
84324
84325
84327
84328
84329
84355
84356
84357
84359
Average*
§
8.
1
84.6
75.3
77.5
80.5
81.4
75.4
77.6
80.8
82.0
83.2
65.4
69.1
72.4
76.0
g
46.3
36.7
35.3
33.3
31.5
45.1
43.7
41.5
40.7
38.3
55.0
54.6
51.9
51.8
Composite HC (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
0.83
0.21
0.21
0.19
0.3
0.25
0.38
0.12
0.21
0.23
0.05
0.17
0.96
0.24
o
>>
P
0.86
0.28
0.21
0.2
0.3
0.25
0.41
0.12
0.21
0.2
0.07
0.19
1.06
0.2
te
a
S
2.62
26.15
1.06
1.78
1.49
3.45
6.72
0.84
1.98
12.65
25.03
10.65
9.69
18.58
17.95
Composite CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
9.04
2.95
2.99
1.14
8.67
5.57
2.12
2.17
1.14
3.49
0.92
4.85
41.62
3.75
o
=
^»
0
7.9
3.83
2.58
0.97
7.44
4.86
2.14
1.85
0.94
2.19
1.05
5.07
44.14
3.13
la
a
S
14.41
22.89
15.97
17.9
16.44
14.64
0.99
16.82
21.26
58.98
12.95
4.35
5.71
19.82
18.06
Composite NOX (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
0.92
0.96
0.66
0.5
1.5
0.46
0.42
0.31
0.68
0.44
0.25
1.34
0.55
1.11
o
=
^»
0
0.76
1.08
0.62
0.48
1.28
0.47
0.41
0.26
0.47
0.27
0.23
1.36
0.56
1.1
la
a
S
20.16
11.24
6.2
4.48
16.88
1.07
2.52
17.08
45.11
61.91
6.55
1.24
2.45
0.79
17.6
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
367.52
264.34
398.4
433.83
365.19
405.25
396.19
445.01
429.3
694.82
414.86
355.85
302.17
422.94
o
=
^»
0
347.47
339.2
387.87
430.66
313.03
403.8
404.01
441.46
425.13
505.63
450.2
370.06
302.85
337.8
la
a
S
5.77
22.07
2.71
0.74
16.66
0.36
1.94
0.81
0.98
37.42
7.85
3.84
0.22
25.2
10.37
1
"1
r4
s
a.
49.626
3.564
4.143
1.449
9.987
3.141
3.101
0.610
1.136
3.879
8.001
PEMS DATASuspect
X
Dyno DATASuspect
*The average percentage difference shown here is the average of the absolute value of the percentage difference for each run
4-41
-------
In Table 4-8, percentage difference of gaseous emissions results between the PEMS and
dynamometer two systems is shown for each run, and results with overall differences greater
than 100% are indicated with bold font. Out of 220 tests, only six show a difference greater than
100% for a pollutant. Overall average percent differences are in the range of 10-18 percent for
HC, CO, NOX and CO2. Comparison of phase-specific and total composite emission rates in the
data shows a relatively good correlation between the PEMS and dynamometer methods of
measurement. Complete (by-phase) results are provided in Appendices G and H. Analysis of
results from the "Measurement Allowance for In-Use Testing" study being conducted in 2006 at
Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas and also analysis of the dynamometer
correlation results between the EPA dynamometer in Ann Arbor and the EPA portable Clayton
dynamometer gathered during the Kansas City Pilot Study may provide insight into any possible
bias issues between the two types of measurements systems. Results from DRI's
gravimetrically-collected PM2.5 measurements are also shown in Table 4-8 for reference.
Additional information and results from particulate matter measurements are provided in Section
4.5.
The last two columns of Table 4-8 indicate dyno and PEMS records which may have
suspicious regulated gaseous pollutant results, based on review of test data. For the
dynamometer data, an "x" in the "dyno data suspect" column indicates either a test anomaly was
noted in the onsite test log, or some issue was identified with the dynamometer data during
subsequent data analysis, which could influence the overall test result. Some examples of data
issues that would be noted include tests for which part or all of the real-time data was improperly
collected or voided, tests where incorrect dynamometer loading was applied, tests where real-
time sensors were saturated (pegged at maximum value), tests with equipment failures that
would affect overall results, or tests where significant drive trace violations occurred. This
review was only applied to dynamometer measurements collected during the study. Detailed
notes pertaining to QC review of all dynamometer measurements are provided in Appendices S
andV.
In addition to the dynamometer data review, all PEMS data was analyzed to identify
missing information and indicators of potentially invalid results. This analysis involved
performing a comparison of exhaust mass flow rates for each test with those of other vehicles
with a similar engine displacement, comparison of exhaust temperatures of each tests with the
exhaust temperatures of other vehicles of similar engine displacement, review of exhaust dilution
levels (percentage CO + CO2 in exhaust), review of ambient temperature measured during testing
and review of test durations, distances, and measured fuel economy. PEMS tests with highly
suspicious results are indicated with an "x" in the "PEMS data suspect" in Table 4-8, and
detailed notes collected during review of Round 1 dyno PEMS tests are provided in Appendix O.
Figure 4-12 provides the same Round 1 PEMS vs. dyno comparison information
graphically with a 1:1 line for reference. HC, CO, NOx, and CO2 are depicted using dots,
squares, triangles, and circle-crosses, respectively. Additional scatter plots of dynamometer
results vs. the PEMS for each particular phase can be located in Appendices G and H. Results
listed as "suspect" in Table 4-8 are not included in Figure 4-12.
4-42
-------
Scatter Plot of Compoate HC (g/mle)
25
10 16
SEMIECH HC (g/Mte)
Scatter Plot of Composite CO (g/rrite)
300
250
200
0 50100150200250300350400
SEMTECH CO (g/mle)
/pfojI/KansaaClty/AriiyBla/RoimdiyBiMiiB^SEMias 25JUL06 1519
Figure 4-12. Plots of Round 1 Dyno vs. PEMS Measurements
4-43
-------
Scatter Plot of Compoate NQx fg/nOe]
1 4
I
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0:
234567
SBKTECH NQx (g/Me)
/f»o]1/KanBaaC^//^alyaWFlound1/SumBKI_SEMja8 25JUL06 1519
Scatter Plot of Compoate CQ2 Ig/nOs]
0 100200300400500600700800900 1000 HOO 1200 1300 1400 1500
SEMIBCH CQ2 (g/Me)
/pio]1/KanBaaC^//^alyBlB/Round1/SumBKI_SEMjaB 25JUL06 1519
Figure 4-12 (Continued). Plots of Round 1 Dyno vs. PEMS Measurements
4-44
-------
Table 4-9 provides results of all conditioning run tests conducted during Round 1, and
Table 4-10 provides results of all driveaway tests conducted during Round 1. As with the PEMS
data collected on the dynamometer, all conditioning run and driveaway results were reviewed to
identify missing information and indicators of potentially invalid results, including an evaluation
of exhaust mass flow rates, exhaust temperatures, dilution levels, ambient temperature
measurements, test duration and distance and measured fuel economy. PEMS tests with highly
suspicious results are indicated with an "x" in the "PEMS data suspect" column in Tables 4-9
and 4-10, and detailed notes collected during review of all Round 1 conditioning run and
driveaway PEMS tests are provided in Appendices Q and R.
4-45
-------
Table 4-9. Round 1 Conditioning Run Test Results
CTR TST ID
C KS1 002 1
C KS1 003 1
C KS1 004 1
C KS1 004 2
C KS1 005 1
C KS1 006 1
C KS1 007 1
C KS1 009 1
C KS1 010 1
C KS1 Oil 1
C KS1 013 1
C KS1 017 1
C KS1 018 1
C KS1 020 1
C KS1 021 1
C KS1 022 1
C KS1 023 1
C KS1 024 1
C KS1 024 2
C KS1 025 1
C KS1 026 1
C KS1 027 1
C KS1 028 1
C KS1 028 2
C KS1 028 3
C KS1 030 1
C KS1 032 1
C KS1 033 1
C KS1 035 1
C KS1 036 1
C KS1 037 1
C KS1 040 1
C KS1 041 1
C KS1 043 1
C KS1 044 1
Make
FORD
DODGE
ISUZU
ISUZU
GMC
FORD
FORD
TOYOTA
DODGE
FORD
HONDA
MAZDA
DODGE
CHEVROLET
HONDA
GMC
OLDSMOBILE
JEEP
JEEP
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
GMC
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
NISSAN
SATURN
DODGE
MERCURY
JEEP
GMC
TOYOTA
DODGE
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
Model
F150
RAM250
TROOPER
TROOPER
YUKON XL
ESCORT LX
F-250
RAV4
SPIRIT
F-150XLT
CIVIC
626
CARAVAN SE
CORSICA
CIVIC SI
JIMMY
CUTLASS CIERA
CHEROKEE SPORT
CHEROKEE SPORT
CAVALIER
300
SATURN
LESABRE
LESABRE
LESABRE
FRONTIER
SATURN
CARAVAN
VILLAGER LS
WRANGLER
PONTIAC GRAND AM
SOLARA SLE
GRAND CARAVAN
SPORT
BLAZER
S-10
Model
Year
1979
1994
1999
1999
2001
1995
1979
2000
1990
2001
1996
2001
1989
1996
2002
1995
1988
1998
1998
1990
1999
2001
1998
1998
1998
2002
1996
1995
1994
1995
1989
2001
1997
1995
2003
Disp
2.3
5.2
3.5
3.5
5.3
1.9
5.7
2.2
2.5
5.4
1.6
2.5
3
2.2
2
4.2
3.8
4
4
2.2
3.5
1.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.3
1.9
3.3
2.5
2.5
2.3
3
3.3
4.3
4.3
Test Date
8/9/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/14/2004
7/14/2004
7/14/2004
7/15/2004
7/15/2004
7/16/2004
7/17/2004
7/17/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/21/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
23
22
0
21
22
21
52
23
25
22
21
23
23
23
18
21
28
0
20
24
21
20
19
22
1
21
21
21
23
19
19
21
20
22
22
Test Distance
(miles)
7.8
0.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.6
8.1
7.8
8.0
8.0
8.0
6.8
8.4
7.7
8.1
7.5
8.1
0.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.7
6.3
7.7
7.7
8.0
6.5
7.7
Fuel Used (gal)
1.39
0.84
0.00
0.46
0.76
0.30
0.76
0.39
0.34
0.65
0.26
0.34
0.40
0.32
0.31
0.57
0.33
0.00
0.48
0.41
0.41
0.23
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.56
0.41
0.53
0.50
0.45
0.39
0.41
0.52
0.44
0.50
Test FE (mpg)
N/A
9.3
N/A
17.3
10.5
26.5
10.6
20.4
23.9
12.3
30.4
25.5
20.3
24.5
26.1
14.0
24.2
N/A
14.3
20.6
18.8
34.5
18.2
19.5
N/A
14.5
19.7
15.0
15.5
14.0
19.7
18.7
15.4
14.7
15.5
Composite CO2
(gpm)
N/A
929.9
N/A
506.7
845.4
327.3
728.4
427.9
360.1
713.5
269.5
348.2
423.1
352.7
336.7
623.5
357.0
N/A
592.5
422.9
468.1
257.2
487.3
460.6
N/A
608.5
447.9
577.5
567.2
617.8
419.0
471.1
573.6
595.2
570.7
Composite CO
(gpm)
N/A
14.47
N/A
3.05
2.66
5.75
74.79
5.40
7.50
6.29
14.14
0.67
7.69
5.68
3.12
5.78
5.94
N/A
14.02
4.58
2.83
0.71
0.65
0.34
N/A
2.96
1.26
7.38
2.46
9.87
16.07
1.98
1.35
5.50
1.27
Composite
NOx (gpm)
N/A
3.22
N/A
0.85
0.47
0.91
1.00
0.69
1.41
0.38
0.67
0.07
3.37
0.84
0.04
1.48
1.05
N/A
4.28
1.02
0.41
0.24
1.30
0.66
N/A
0.37
0.66
2.21
1.58
0.68
6.88
0.33
1.31
1.68
0.84
Composite
THC (gpm)
N/A
0.84
N/A
0.19
0.18
0.20
1.73
0.26
0.49
0.32
0.59
0.09
1.62
0.36
0.07
0.34
0.55
N/A
2.39
0.58
0.40
0.04
0.13
0.10
N/A
0.07
0.20
0.64
0.43
0.47
2.54
0.16
0.16
0.25
0.18
05
OS
o
1
VI
9
CO
X
X
X
X
4-46
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 049 1
C KS1 050 1
C KS1 051 1
C KS1 052 1
C KS1 056 1
C KS1 056 2
C KS1 057 1
C KS1 057 2
C KS1 058 1
C KS1 061 1
C KS1 062 1
C KS1 063 1
C KS1 064 1
C KS1 065 1
C KS1 066 1
C KS1 067 1
C KS1 067 2
C KS1 068 1
C KS1 069 1
C KS1 071 1
C KS1 072 1
C KS1 073 1
C KS1 074 1
C KS1 075 1
C KS1 076 1
C KS1 076 2
C KS1 077 1
C KS1 078 1
C KS1 078 2
C KS1 080 1
C KS1 081 1
C KS1 082 1
C KS1 083 1
C KS1 085 1
C KS1 086 1
C KS1 088 1
C KS1 090 1
C KS1 092 1
C KS1 093 1
Make
LINCOLN
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
HONDA
NISSAN
CHEVROLET
FORD
HYUNDAI
CADILLAC
SATURN
SATURN
FORD
ISUZU
TOYOTA
NISSAN
FORD
MERCURY
TOYOTA
HONDA
HONDA
TOYOTA
HONDA
HONDA
JEEP
DODGE
TOYOTA
NISSAN
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
PONTIAC
FORD
CHEVROLET
Model
TOWNCAR
CIVIC EX
ACCORD
ACCORD LX
ACCORD EX
ACCORD EX
TAURUS SES
TAURUS SES
MALIBU LS
ODYSSEY
PATHFINDER LE
LUMINA
MUSTANG
TIBURON
SEVILLE
SL1
SL1
EXPLORER
RODEO SL
RAV4
SENTRA GXE
RANGER
SABLE LS
CAMRY
CIVIC
CIVIC
AVALON
CIVIC DX
CIVIC DX
GRAND CHEROKEE
RAMLE
COROLLA
MAXIMA
F-150
CONTOUR
S-10
GRAND PRIX
EXPLORER
SILVERADO
Model
Year
1990
1999
1997
1989
2000
2000
2003
2003
1998
2004
2003
1998
1999
2000
1991
1999
1999
1993
1999
2000
1997
1999
2002
1994
1984
1984
1999
1991
1991
1995
1991
1997
2000
1995
1995
1996
1993
2000
2002
Disp
5
1.6
2.2
2
2.2
2.2
3
3
3.1
3.5
3.5
3.1
4.6
2
4.9
1.9
1.9
4
3.2
2
1.6
3
3
2.2
1.5
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
4
5.2
1.6
3
5
2
4.3
3.1
4
5.3
Test Date
7/26/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
8/3/2004
7/29/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
20
21
23
20
22
4
20
6
19
20
18
21
19
20
21
26
1
42
21
22
19
23
22
21
24
0
21
23
0
23
22
21
20
21
21
21
22
19
33
Test Distance
(miles)
8.0
8.0
7.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.5
7.7
7.7
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.0
7.8
8.6
8.0
8.0
7.4
8.0
7.8
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
9.4
Fuel Used (gal)
0.55
0.20
0.32
0.47
0.43
0.00
0.36
0.00
0.38
0.48
0.51
0.38
0.30
0.31
0.55
0.36
0.00
0.56
0.46
0.43
0.37
0.47
0.33
0.43
0.23
0.27
0.31
0.40
0.00
0.19
0.56
0.28
0.38
0.47
0.34
0.32
0.38
0.30
0.45
Test FE (mpg)
14.7
N/A
25.3
16.3
18.8
N/A
21.9
N/A
21.0
16.6
N/A
22.2
26.2
24.9
14.5
22.5
N/A
14.4
17.4
18.4
21.4
17.0
24.1
18.4
37.3
0.0
25.7
19.9
N/A
38.6
14.4
28.3
21.3
17.2
23.4
25.1
20.9
26.6
20.6
Composite CO2
(gpm)
560.5
N/A
352.3
420.7
471.9
N/A
408.7
N/A
424.4
538.0
N/A
399.7
334.5
408.7
602.0
392.0
N/A
608.5
501.5
478.4
414.5
521.7
370.5
456.7
217.0
N/A
344.9
429.5
N/A
217.1
585.1
311.7
416.4
507.4
372.7
351.1
413.3
332.4
429.2
Composite CO
(gpm)
23.42
N/A
1.23
80.42
2.14
N/A
0.10
N/A
1.02
1.14
N/A
1.11
4.25
1.32
8.63
3.03
N/A
8.47
6.92
3.78
1.06
0.87
0.20
17.73
12.52
N/A
1.19
11.05
N/A
6.61
17.71
1.92
1.03
6.55
4.91
2.48
7.11
1.14
0.78
Composite
NOx (gpm)
2.11
N/A
0.37
1.08
0.39
N/A
0.07
N/A
0.68
0.12
N/A
0.55
0.38
0.33
0.85
1.49
N/A
2.76
1.67
0.82
1.12
0.24
0.09
2.99
1.19
N/A
0.46
2.87
N/A
3.86
3.36
0.68
0.89
1.41
0.45
0.50
1.82
0.28
0.36
Composite
THC (gpm)
4.62
N/A
0.09
2.31
0.09
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.18
0.18
N/A
0.18
0.17
0.06
0.53
0.20
N/A
0.33
0.70
0.41
0.14
0.06
0.02
0.41
0.48
N/A
0.23
1.03
N/A
0.85
1.31
0.32
0.20
0.27
0.23
0.18
0.66
0.02
0.11
a
1
1
e.
VI
9
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-47
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 094 1
C KS1 094 2
C KS1 095 1
C KS1 096 1
C KS1 097 1
C KS1 098 1
C KS1 099 1
C KS1 100 1
C KS1 1012 1
C KS1 102 1
C KS1 103 1
C KS1 104 1
C KS1 105 1
C KS1 105 2
C KS1 107 1
C KS1 108 1
C KS1 109 1
C KS1 110 1
C KS1 110 2
C KS1 112 1
C KS1 113 1
C KS1 114 1
C KS1 116 1
C KS1 117 1
C KS1 118 1
C KS1 120 1
C KS1 121 1
C KS1 123 1
C KS1 124 1
C KS1 126 1
C KS1 127 1
C KS1 128 1
C KS1 129 1
C KS1 132 1
C KS1 133 1
C KS1 134 1
C KS1 134 2
C KS1 138 1
C KS1 139 1
Make
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
BUICK
SUBARU
FORD
FORD
VOLVO
MAZDA
NISSAN
DODGE
CHRYSLER
TOYOTA
JEEP
JEEP
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
MERCURY
BUICK
BUICK
FORD
FORD
CHRYSLER
FORD
CHEVROLET
LINCOLN
HONDA
DODGE
JEEP
FORD
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
HONDA
FORD
FORD
HONDA
NISSAN
NISSAN
CHRYSLER
VOLVO
Model
VOYAGER
VOYAGER
LESABRE
OUTBACK LEGACY
THUNDERBIRD
EXPLORER XLT
S80
PROTEGE
MAXIMA
GRAND CARAVAN SE
TOWN & COUNTRY
CELICA
CHEROKEE SPORT
CHEROKEE SPORT
CAMRY LE
CAVALIER
GRAND MARQUIS GS
CENTURY LIMITED
CENTURY LIMITED
PROBE
BRONCO
CONCORD
ESCORT ZX2
BLAZER LS
TOWNCAR
ACCORD
DYNASTY
CHEROKEE
ESCORT
VOYAGER
ODYSSEY
ACCORD
F150
RANGER XLT
ACCORD LX
SENTRA
SENTRA
LEBARON
850
Model
Year
1998
1998
1989
1996
1988
1995
2001
1991
1992
1999
2000
1999
1993
1993
2000
1997
1997
1998
1998
1993
1995
2000
1999
2002
1987
1990
1988
1990
2002
1993
2000
2000
2000
1988
2001
1994
1994
1983
1997
Disp
3.3
3.3
3.8
2.2
3.8
4
2.9
1.8
3
3.3
3.3
2.2
4
4
2.2
2.2
4.6
3.1
3.1
2.5
5.8
2.7
2
4.3
4.3
2.2
3.3
4
2
3
3.5
2.3
4.2
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.6
2.6
2.4
Test Date
8/3/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/29/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/11/2004
8/24/2004
8/3/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/6/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/7/2004
8/7/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004
8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004
8/10/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
21
22
19
21
47
21
18
29
22
20
21
20
23
31
21
21
22
22
0
23
17
20
27
22
22
20
21
21
22
21
21
20
22
24
24
30
24
30
20
Test Distance
(miles)
8.0
7.9
8.1
8.5
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.8
8.6
7.9
8.0
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.5
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
7.9
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.6
8.0
7.7
7.8
8.1
7.8
Fuel Used (gal)
0.46
0.40
0.41
0.43
0.55
0.56
0.30
0.34
0.00
0.30
0.46
0.35
0.48
0.32
0.27
0.24
0.35
0.25
0.00
0.43
0.56
0.39
0.32
0.48
0.53
0.31
0.22
0.26
0.36
0.31
0.46
0.31
0.41
0.55
0.44
0.00
0.26
0.62
0.31
Test FE (mpg)
N/A
20.1
19.2
18.9
15.5
14.5
26.4
23.8
N/A
26.3
17.4
22.7
16.2
26.4
29.1
33.1
22.6
30.5
N/A
18.5
13.5
20.4
25.3
16.6
15.0
25.6
36.1
31.6
22.2
N/A
17.3
25.9
18.9
13.8
18.3
N/A
30.4
13.0
25.3
Composite CO2
(gpm)
N/A
441.3
459.9
453.9
542.5
603.6
335.0
343.9
0.0
335.0
509.4
1023.5
531.9
321.6
298.9
264.4
386.2
288.9
N/A
458.3
644.1
433.8
342.4
537.6
567.8
328.7
237.0
272.6
401.7
N/A
510.6
339.6
462.2
607.5
488.6
0.0
281.7
646.8
352.7
Composite CO
(gpm)
N/A
1.60
2.08
11.09
18.36
6.07
0.74
14.04
0.00
1.21
1.17
2.71
11.73
7.84
3.75
2.46
6.01
3.01
N/A
15.39
12.05
2.56
7.43
1.12
15.95
12.17
4.86
5.61
0.43
N/A
3.27
3.09
6.28
21.17
0.67
0.00
8.25
24.88
0.52
Composite
NOx (gpm)
N/A
0.63
0.87
1.12
1.91
2.85
0.22
3.75
0.00
0.45
0.59
0.04
2.89
2.03
0.41
0.49
0.76
0.26
N/A
0.94
2.47
0.94
0.73
0.33
4.96
1.04
1.68
2.62
0.06
N/A
0.47
0.28
0.33
2.31
0.10
0.00
0.65
1.83
0.38
Composite
THC (gpm)
N/A
0.17
0.30
0.48
1.43
0.25
0.10
3.77
0.00
0.15
0.11
0.17
1.41
0.90
0.14
0.11
0.13
0.19
N/A
1.06
0.44
0.39
0.16
0.14
1.35
0.80
0.96
0.63
0.05
N/A
0.19
0.10
0.35
2.46
0.03
0.00
0.36
0.68
0.16
a
1
1
e.
VI
9
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-48
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 140 1
C KS1 140 2
C KS1 141 1
C KS1 142 1
C KS1 147 1
C KS1 148 1
C KS1 149 1
C KS1 150 1
C KS1 151 1
C KS1 152 1
C KS1 153 1
C KS1 154 1
C KS1 159 1
C KS1 160 1
C KS1 164 1
C KS1 165 1
C KS1 166 1
C KS1 167 1
C KS1 167 2
C KS1 171 1
C KS1 171 2
C KS1 173 1
C KS1 175 1
C KS1 178 1
C KS1 179 1
C KS1 180 1
C KS1 180 2
C KS1 181 1
C KS1 182 1
C KS1 187 1
C KS1 189 1
C KS1 193 1
C KS1 194 1
C KS1 195 1
C KS1 196 1
C KS1 197 1
C KS1 199 1
C KS1 201 1
C KS1 203 1
Make
MERCURY
MERCURY
FORD
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
BUICK
CADILLAC
FORD
PONTIAC
MERCURY
MERCURY
JEEP
FORD
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
HONDA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
SUBARU
SUBARU
CHEVROLET
HYUNDAI
CHEVROLET
GMC
GMC
GMC
SATURN
BUICK
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
LINCOLN
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
DODGE
MAZDA
OLDSMOBILE
Model
TOPAZ GS
TOPAZ GS
FOCUS SE
VOYAGER
CIVIC DX
REGAL
CIMMARON
RANGER
BONNEVILLE
TOPAZ
SABLE
CHEROKEE
THUNDERBIRD LX
CAMRY
COROLLA
CIVIC
CAMRY
COROLLA
COROLLA
OUTBACK
OUTBACK
MONTE CARLO
SANTA FE
LUMINA
SAFARI
SONOMA SLS
SONOMA SLS
SL1
REGAL
ASTRO VAN
S- 10 TRUCK
ECONOLINE
TOWNCAR
F150 TRUCK
WINDSTAR
C 1500
STRATUS ES
MX-6
NINETY EIGHT
Model
Year
1994
1994
2001
1999
1988
1996
1986
1999
1988
1994
1996
1998
1995
1997
1996
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
1977
2001
1999
1993
2001
2001
1994
1990
1991
1985
1983
1989
1998
1999
1994
1996
1988
1985
Disp
2.3
2.3
2
3.3
1.5
3.8
2.8
3
3.8
2.3
3
4
4.6
2.2
1.8
1.6
2.2
1.8
1.8
2.5
2.5
5
2.4
2.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
3.1
3.1
4.3
2.8
5.8
5
4.2
4.2
5.7
2.4
2.2
3.8
Test Date
8/13/2004
8/11/2004
8/1 1/2004
8/11/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/14/2004
8/13/2004
8/13/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/16/2004
8/16/2004
8/18/2004
8/16/2004
8/16/2004
8/17/2004
8/17/2004
8/17/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
21
21
20
24
22
23
25
20
29
34
29
34
48
59
66
33
25
20
17
32
2
20
21
22
34
0
26
23
0
59
23
33
30
24
21
40
25
42
35
Test Distance
(miles)
6.8
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
7.8
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.6
0.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.6
8.0
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
Fuel Used (gal)
0.30
0.24
0.28
0.49
0.33
0.30
0.37
0.32
0.31
0.45
0.11
0.42
0.15
0.29
0.22
0.26
0.33
0.29
0.00
0.88
0.00
0.48
0.47
0.48
0.34
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.31
1.12
0.49
0.33
0.39
0.48
0.37
0.59
0.40
0.36
0.58
Test FE (mpg)
22.4
33.9
28.0
16.5
24.4
26.7
21.5
25.2
N/A
18.0
75.6
19.1
52.0
27.5
35.4
30.8
24.2
27.7
N/A
21.1
N/A
17.1
17.0
16.7
23.6
N/A
23.7
23.3
0.0
16.6
16.3
55.9
20.4
16.8
21.9
13.5
20.2
22.6
13.7
Composite CO2
(gpm)
394.1
258.5
315.4
540.9
336.1
333.5
405.0
348.3
N/A
493.3
115.5
461.5
165.6
322.3
251.0
287.2
366.9
320.7
N/A
418.5
N/A
444.2
521.4
533.3
360.2
N/A
375.8
365.4
N/A
513.3
415.3
116.0
397.2
529.1
404.6
637.3
421.8
374.4
587.1
Composite CO
(gpm)
3.37
3.09
3.33
0.91
17.24
1.05
5.94
3.43
N/A
1.72
1.76
4.10
4.20
2.05
2.15
1.88
1.58
1.25
N/A
2.38
N/A
43.08
1.93
3.97
8.22
N/A
0.16
11.24
N/A
17.66
79.13
26.67
24.38
1.10
1.78
15.08
10.72
10.92
42.08
Composite
NOx (gpm)
0.61
0.58
0.17
0.36
1.32
0.47
0.69
0.63
N/A
0.59
0.29
1.41
0.44
0.53
0.52
0.11
0.45
0.51
N/A
0.07
N/A
11.58
0.63
0.52
0.91
N/A
0.11
0.85
N/A
1.24
1.64
1.11
2.59
0.44
0.40
0.60
5.63
3.34
1.09
Composite
THC (gpm)
0.28
0.19
0.08
0.17
1.61
0.10
0.88
0.48
N/A
0.35
0.12
0.47
0.20
0.18
0.23
0.05
0.15
0.12
N/A
0.05
N/A
3.85
0.08
0.11
2.00
N/A
0.02
0.48
N/A
1.01
5.37
1.21
0.96
0.15
0.05
0.61
0.48
0.71
0.68
a
1
1
e.
VI
9
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-49
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 204 1
C KS1 207 1
C KS1 208 1
C KS1 210 1
C KS1 212 1
C KS1 212 2
C KS1 213 1
C KS1 215 1
C KS1 219 1
C KS1 221 1
C KS1 222 1
C KS1 223 1
C KS1 225 1
C KS1 226 1
C KS1 226 2
C KS1 228 1
C KS1 233 1
C KS1 233 2
C KS1 234 1
C KS1 235 1
C KS1 236 1
C KS1 236 2
C KS1 237 1
C KS1 239 1
C KS1 240 1
C KS1 241 1
C KS1 243 1
C KS1 244 1
C KS1 245 1
C KS1 246 1
C KS1 247 1
C KS1 248 1
C KS1 249 1
C KS1 250 1
C KS1 253 1
C KS1 254 1
C KS1 255 1
C KS1 259 1
Make
LINCOLN
PONTIAC
FORD
FORD
CHRYSLER
CHRYSLER
OLDSMOBILE
FORD
HONDA
BUICK
PONTIAC
DODGE
TOYOTA
NISSAN
NISSAN
OLDSMOBILE
FORD
FORD
FORD
PONTIAC
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
GEO
FORD
FORD
CADILLAC
HONDA
INFINITI
PLYMOUTH
EAGLE
FORD
VOLVO
CHEVROLET
FORD
BUICK
MERCURY
FORD
PLYMOUTH
Model
REGENCY
TOWNCAR
BONNEVILLE
F150
TAURUS
CONCORD
CONCORD
EIGHTY-EIGHT
CROWN VICTORIA
CIVIC
CENTURY
GRAND AM
GRAND CARAVAN
COROLLA
SENTRA
SENTRA
SILHOUETTE
TAURUS
TAURUS
F1504X2
6000
ACHIEVA
ACHIEVA
PRISM
ESCORT
CONTOUR
SEDAN DE VILLE
ACCORD
130
VOYAGER
TALON
RANGER
240 GL
S-10
ESCORT
REGAL
SABLE
TAURUS
ACCLAIM
Model
Year
1987
1994
1990
2002
1994
1994
1994
1985
2000
1997
1992
2005
1989
1993
1993
2000
1987
1987
1987
1988
1992
1992
1990
1993
1998
1993
1987
1998
1997
1994
1987
1983
1989
1987
1992
1997
2001
1990
Disp
5
3.8
4.9
3
3.5
3.5
3.8
5
1.6
3.1
2.3
3.8
1.6
1.3
1.3
3.4
3
3
4.9
2.8
2.3
1.9
1.6
1.8
2.5
4.9
2
3
3.3
1.8
2.9
2.3
4.3
1.9
3.8
3
3
2.5
Test Date
8/23/2004
8/25/2004
8/25/2004
8/26/2004
8/25/2004
8/25/2004
8/27/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
25
20
22
48
21
21
30
20
30
22
25
46
23
21
0
49
8
20
32
23
27
0
22
20
23
21
20
19
18
24
22
23
20
17
22
24
20
41
Test Distance
(miles)
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
5.2
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.7
Fuel Used (gal)
0.07
0.34
0.00
0.47
0.30
0.30
0.37
0.70
0.27
0.00
0.32
0.42
0.34
0.26
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.37
1.31
0.28
0.45
0.33
0.19
0.08
0.34
0.45
0.40
0.15
0.30
0.23
0.51
0.30
0.41
0.15
0.44
0.18
0.40
0.34
Test FE (mpg)
116.3
23.5
N/A
17.1
26.3
26.3
21.4
11.4
29.7
N/A
25.2
19.2
23.9
30.4
N/A
24.3
4.3
21.7
14.2
28.9
17.8
0.0
41.1
98.4
23.4
17.7
20.1
52.0
26.4
34.1
15.8
26.6
19.7
35.6
18.2
45.5
20.1
55.5
Composite CO2
(gpm)
73.5
374.6
0.0
518.1
324.1
324.1
411.7
686.8
292.0
0.0
321.6
459.7
334.2
275.5
N/A
363.4
378.4
402.6
502.3
298.4
489.8
N/A
200.4
75.1
351.6
460.5
408.4
171.1
336.5
259.7
541.4
329.8
440.2
178.7
479.7
192.7
443.5
94.4
Composite CO
(gpm)
1.21
1.93
0.00
0.29
6.77
6.77
1.98
56.07
4.33
0.00
19.60
0.83
24.47
10.41
N/A
0.90
12.97
5.35
68.81
4.89
6.54
N/A
7.26
9.28
18.41
26.00
21.92
0.29
1.14
0.88
11.63
3.34
6.66
44.12
5.40
1.88
0.55
40.45
Composite
NOx (gpm)
0.27
0.47
0.00
0.26
2.38
2.38
0.51
1.38
0.09
0.00
5.32
0.17
1.42
0.20
N/A
0.49
0.00
1.48
6.03
1.36
3.02
N/A
3.19
0.72
0.35
2.12
3.11
0.19
0.82
1.05
2.26
1.46
1.22
1.05
2.67
0.42
0.03
0.58
Composite
THC (gpm)
0.38
0.18
0.00
0.12
0.70
0.70
0.14
1.31
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.07
0.54
0.28
N/A
0.10
0.00
0.20
7.19
0.69
0.45
N/A
1.79
0.58
0.68
1.05
0.72
0.07
0.18
0.24
1.63
0.33
0.39
3.20
0.39
0.10
0.05
2.47
a
1
1
e.
VI
9
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-50
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 282 1
C KS1 290 1
C KS1 294 1
C KS1 297 1
C KS1 298 1
C KS1 299 1
C KS1 300 1
C KS1 301 1
C KS1 302 1
C KS1 304 1
C KS1 305 1
C KS1 306 1
C KS1 307 1
C KS1 308 1
C KS1 309 1
C KS1 312 1
C KS1 314 1
C KS1 316 1
C KS1 317 1
C KS1 318 1
C KS1 319 1
C KS1 321 1
C KS1 322 1
C KS1 323 1
C KS1 324 1
C KS1 325 1
C KS1 326 1
C KS1 327 1
C KS1 328 1
C KS1 329 1
C KS1 329 2
C KS1 330 1
C KS1 331 1
C KS1 332 1
C KS1 333 1
C KS1 335 1
C KS1 336 1
C KS1 337 1
Make
OLDSMOBILE
DODGE
BUICK
KIA
CHEVROLET
BUICK
FORD
MERCURY
BUICK
FORD
HONDA
JEEP
GMC
MG
OLDSMOBILE
HONDA
GMC
HONDA
OLDSMOBILE
VOLVO
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
PONTIAC
BUICK
DODGE
TOYOTA
DODGE
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
PONTIAC
CHEVROLET
OLDSMOBILE
M.BENZ
CHEVROLET
FORD
Model
DELTA 88
RAM 50
CENTURY
SEPHIA
CAVALIER
LESABRE
F150
GRAND MARQUIS
ELECTRA PARK AVE
ASPIRE
ACCORD
GRAND CHEROKEE
JIMMY
MG
SILHOUETTE
CIVIC
SIERRA
CIVIC
CUSTOM CRUISER
STATI
GL
CAPRICE
RAM
F150
GRAND PRIX
LESABRE
STRATUS
CAMRY
DURANGO
CIVIC
CIVIC
CIVIC
ACCORD
GRAND AM
MALIBU
SILHOUETTE
280 SE
G-20
F150
Model
Year
1991
1989
1984
2000
1989
1979
1994
1986
1989
1995
2001
1995
1990
1978
1997
2000
1995
1997
1984
1984
1987
1997
1993
1989
1990
1996
1997
1999
1998
2001
2001
1992
1994
1999
2002
1973
1993
1997
Disp
3.8
2.3
3
1.8
2
4.9
5
5
3.8
1.3
3.8
4
4.3
1.8
3.4
1.6
4.3
1.6
5
2.3
5
5.9
4.9
3.1
3.8
2.4
2.5
5.9
1.6
1.7
1.7
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.4
4.5
5.7
4.6
Test Date
9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/1 1/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/14/2004
9/13/2004
9/14/2004
9/13/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/20/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
19
20
22
23
18
19
19
23
22
21
23
33
31
35
0
24
21
20
18
21
22
35
25
20
20
21
20
22
22
34
34
25
29
27
23
23
45
31
Test Distance
(miles)
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.7
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.6
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
14.1
18.6
Fuel Used (gal)
0.35
0.32
0.75
0.19
0.14
0.45
0.58
0.46
0.42
0.31
0.47
1.11
0.41
0.66
0.52
0.29
0.68
0.33
0.57
0.41
0.60
1.66
0.52
0.62
0.48
0.42
0.37
0.82
0.25
0.55
0.55
0.43
0.37
0.40
0.51
0.77
0.43
1.21
Test FE (mpg)
23.3
24.5
10.7
42.0
58.9
17.6
13.8
17.5
19.0
26.2
17.0
16.7
19.4
12.3
0.0
27.2
11.8
24.4
14.1
19.7
13.4
11.2
15.3
12.9
16.7
19.3
21.4
9.8
32.2
33.9
33.9
18.6
21.9
20.2
15.7
10.4
32.6
15.4
Composite CO2
(gpm)
377.8
356.4
623.4
212.9
149.3
492.6
645.4
492.8
465.2
330.0
525.1
525.9
450.0
363.6
N/A
322.3
683.7
332.7
518.6
432.3
519.4
780.5
569.1
604.7
531.6
448.2
409.2
904.5
270.1
260.0
260.0
476.4
397.2
443.0
568.7
564.1
197.2
566.4
Composite CO
(gpm)
4.19
5.01
118.30
0.28
1.44
5.37
2.41
10.37
2.97
6.29
1.41
4.57
7.01
230.00
N/A
2.68
39.96
20.20
60.87
10.52
88.36
10.80
7.45
38.84
1.08
7.32
3.96
4.62
3.72
2.01
2.01
2.88
7.18
0.85
0.87
180.28
42.55
10.16
Composite
NOx (gpm)
1.19
3.88
0.96
0.07
0.39
8.08
4.53
1.26
0.63
1.77
0.20
2.82
0.62
1.14
N/A
0.34
2.33
0.61
5.89
3.69
2.32
3.32
1.62
1.85
0.95
0.86
0.89
1.03
0.11
0.17
0.17
0.64
1.93
0.48
0.26
1.45
0.38
0.52
Composite
THC (gpm)
0.29
0.52
12.33
0.01
0.18
2.11
0.74
1.25
0.33
0.64
0.14
0.44
0.43
16.16
N/A
0.17
4.45
0.66
7.79
1.19
4.89
0.29
0.81
8.45
0.15
0.41
0.24
0.06
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.32
0.44
0.07
0.01
10.18
3.22
0.24
a
1
1
e.
03
9
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-51
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 338 1
C KS1 339 1
C KS1 341 1
C KS1 343 1
C KS1 344 1
C KS1 346 1
C KS1 347 1
C KS1 348 1
C KS1 349 1
C KS1 350 1
C KS1 350 2
C KS1 351 1
C KS1 352 1
C KS1 354 1
C KS1 355 1
C KS1 356 1
C KS1 358 1
C KS1 359 1
C KS1 360 1
C KS1 361 1
C KS1 363 1
C KS1 363 2
C KS1 364 1
C KS1 364 2
C KS1 367 1
C KS1 368 1
C KS1 369 1
C KS1 369 2
C KS1 372 1
C KS1 373 1
C KS1 373 2
C KS1 374 1
C KS1 377 1
C KS1 379 1
C KS1 381 1
C KS1 381 2
C KS1 383 1
C KS1 383 2
C KS1 384 1
Make
CHEVROLET
PLYMOUTH
DODGE
TOYOTA
NISSAN
TOYOTA
NISSAN
PLYMOUTH
FORD
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
NISSAN
TOYOTA
FORD
JEEP
KIA
CHEVROLET
MERCURY
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
PONTIAC
PONTIAC
SATURN
SATURN
PLYMOUTH
TOYOTA
FORD
FORD
KIA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
SATURN
Model
VENTURE
VOYAGER
AVENGER
COROLLA
SENTRA
CAMRY
ALTIMA
SUNDANCE
WINDSTAR
AVALON
AVALON
MAXIMA
CAMRY
TAURUS
WRANGLER
RIO
CAPRICE-ESTATE
GRAND MARQUIS
PICKUP
CAVALIER
GRAND AM SE
GRAND AM SE
SEDAN
SEDAN
VOYAGER
CAMRY
RANGER
RANGER
SEDONA
COROLLA
COROLLA
SIENNA
CUTLASS
LUMINA
CONTOUR
CONTOUR
F150
F150
WAGON
Model
Year
2003
1991
1996
1989
1997
1990
2000
1989
2001
1996
1996
1997
1999
1998
1997
2004
1990
1988
1987
2004
1997
1997
2001
2001
1999
1994
2003
2003
2004
1995
1995
2000
1987
1997
1996
1996
1989
1989
1993
Disp
3.4
3
2
1.6
3
2
2.4
2.3
3.8
3
3
3
2.2
3
4
1.6
5
5
2.4
2.2
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
3.8
3
4
4
3.5
1.6
1.6
3
2.5
3.1
2
2
4.9
4.9
1.9
Test Date
9/17/2004
9/17/2004
9/17/2004
9/17/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/17/2004
9/29/2004
9/18/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
20
23
16
20
14
21
25
21
22
19
18
20
20
22
21
19
22
22
25
18
21
23
20
23
22
21
19
21
20
21
23
21
25
22
23
22
20
25
37
Test Distance
(miles)
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
5.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.7
8.0
8.0
8.1
9.4
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.5
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
22.1
Fuel Used (gal)
0.42
0.36
0.26
0.28
0.19
0.29
0.47
0.41
0.42
0.38
0.40
0.33
0.37
0.42
0.49
0.25
0.52
0.13
0.44
0.36
0.37
0.37
0.36
0.32
0.48
0.31
0.47
0.46
0.49
0.27
0.27
0.46
0.74
0.47
0.27
0.27
0.54
0.57
0.72
Test FE (mpg)
19.1
22.3
31.0
28.7
29.6
27.7
17.0
19.6
19.1
21.1
20.1
24.7
21.8
19.3
16.3
31.8
15.1
63.8
18.3
22.3
20.9
21.6
22.0
25.4
19.7
25.8
16.9
17.3
16.2
29.2
29.6
16.2
10.8
17.0
29.4
29.2
14.9
14.1
30.7
Composite CO2
(gpm)
468.7
385.2
263.5
305.7
293.5
296.6
512.2
436.4
470.5
416.6
443.5
359.9
406.6
456.3
540.0
281.0
530.1
135.8
485.7
399.5
419.9
403.1
404.9
337.1
451.1
337.9
527.2
513.6
547.3
302.2
292.0
545.3
699.5
513.0
295.8
297.6
580.9
612.4
270.7
Composite CO
(gpm)
0.61
7.40
14.83
3.18
4.44
14.58
7.61
12.70
0.56
2.43
1.24
1.77
2.85
4.61
5.97
0.38
34.66
1.87
2.04
0.77
4.90
6.52
0.49
9.29
1.80
5.23
0.77
2.98
3.38
2.18
5.50
2.14
58.28
9.89
5.83
5.37
8.89
10.78
12.36
Composite
NOx (gpm)
0.19
1.91
0.78
1.18
0.71
0.98
1.30
1.56
0.11
0.94
0.70
0.29
0.48
0.21
0.37
0.08
1.32
0.26
4.57
0.04
0.88
0.79
0.22
0.30
0.56
0.31
0.22
0.20
0.00
0.86
0.75
0.86
5.92
0.80
0.27
0.20
6.34
5.55
0.82
Composite
THC (gpm)
0.09
1.30
1.00
0.35
0.22
0.83
0.14
0.62
0.04
0.35
0.25
0.36
0.17
0.05
0.24
0.04
3.28
0.51
0.77
0.04
0.15
0.19
0.02
0.18
0.13
0.33
0.05
0.06
0.02
0.21
0.38
0.43
12.94
0.25
0.20
0.26
2.05
3.12
0.87
a
1
1
e.
VI
9
CO
X
X
X
X
4-52
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 385 1
C KS1 386 1
C KS1 386 2
C KS1 387 1
C KS1 388 1
C KS1 389 1
C KS1 390 1
C KS1 394 1
C KS1 394 2
C KS1 395 1
C KS1 398 1
C KS1 399 1
C KS1 416 1
C KS1 417 1
C KS1 419 1
C KS1 420 1
C KS1 420 2
C KS1 421 1
C KS1 424 1
C KS1 424 2
C KS1 425 1
C KS1 425 2
C KS1 426 1
C KS1 427 1
C KS1 428 1
C KS1 429 1
C KS1 429 2
C KS1 430 1
C KS1 432 1
C KS1 433 1
C KS1 434 1
C KS1 436 1
C KS1 437 1
C KS1 437 2
C KS1 438 1
C KS1 439 1
C KS1 440 1
Make
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
TOYOTA
DODGE
CHEVROLET
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
PONTIAC
MERCURY
CHEVROLET
FORD
TOYOTA
NISSAN
M.BENZ
M.BENZ
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
VOLVO
VOLVO
TOYOTA
SATURN
FORD
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
HONDA
LINCOLN
FORD
MERCURY
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
GEO
FORD
Model
TRACKER
CAPRICE CLASSIC
WAGO
CAPRICE CLASSIC
WAGO
ESCORT
CAMRY
RAM
SUBURBAN
COROLLA
COROLLA
GRAND AM
TRACER
LUMINA
TAURUS SE
COROLLA
MAXIMA
SEL
SEL
TAURUS
ASTRO
ASTRO
850 TURBO
850 TURBO
CAMRY
SL1
TAURUS
CUTLASS WAGON
CUTLASS WAGON
ODYSSEY
CONTINENTAL
F-150
MARQUIS
GRAND AM GT
CAMRY
CAMRY
AVALANCHE
PRISM
BRONCO
Model
Year
2003
1987
1987
1999
2001
1986
1995
1992
1992
1997
1995
2001
1998
1996
2002
1980
1980
1993
1990
1990
1996
1996
1994
1997
1995
1989
1989
2000
1995
1989
1994
1998
1996
1996
2002
1996
1990
Disp
2.5
5
5
2
3
3.7
5.7
1.6
1.6
2.4
1.9
3.1
3
1.8
3.5
4.5
4.5
3.8
4.3
4.3
2.3
2.3
3
1.9
3
3.3
3.3
3.5
4.6
4.9
4.6
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.6
5
Test Date
9/24/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
Test Duration
(minutes)
19
17
19
19
20
19
20
24
21
22
22
23
22
20
21
21
20
22
38
25
24
24
22
21
19
19
23
24
19
34
21
27
22
8
34
22
36
Test Distance
(miles)
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.7
8.0
8.0
7.7
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.6
8.0
8.1
8.0
18.6
8.0
18.5
Fuel Used (gal)
0.40
0.45
0.56
0.32
0.40
0.48
0.75
0.37
0.36
0.28
0.19
0.33
0.44
0.28
0.35
0.80
0.73
0.48
0.68
0.68
0.20
0.21
0.32
0.24
0.36
0.46
0.52
0.44
0.37
1.12
0.43
0.29
0.26
0.00
1.42
0.26
1.12
Test FE (mpg)
20.2
17.8
14.2
25.0
20.0
16.6
10.7
21.8
21.2
28.7
43.1
23.3
18.3
28.8
22.9
10.0
10.9
14.7
11.8
11.8
39.2
38.2
25.3
33.0
21.1
17.2
15.2
18.2
21.5
16.5
18.7
27.4
30.7
N/A
13.1
30.6
16.6
Composite CO2
(gpm)
442.0
455.1
563.5
351.2
443.8
396.3
806.3
404.6
413.2
306.6
200.6
382.9
486.8
301.8
389.6
392.8
376.3
597.2
633.5
579.6
225.7
231.2
338.3
266.7
420.1
503.1
564.7
482.7
410.0
487.6
464.4
320.0
291.0
N/A
680.9
281.3
504.0
Composite CO
(gpm)
0.98
29.95
39.83
4.03
2.90
79.53
18.40
3.78
5.41
3.16
4.18
0.90
1.86
5.27
0.94
331.04
294.59
6.86
73.24
107.72
1.61
1.85
10.78
2.40
2.19
11.31
14.11
6.07
4.55
30.52
8.24
4.69
0.69
N/A
1.74
6.55
20.91
Composite
NOx (gpm)
0.23
5.03
5.99
0.93
0.13
2.15
1.66
1.13
0.92
1.12
0.94
0.21
0.29
1.73
0.21
0.03
0.18
0.94
1.50
1.47
0.67
0.77
0.24
0.36
0.89
0.85
1.26
0.81
1.26
2.24
0.97
0.63
0.22
N/A
0.46
0.91
1.87
Composite
THC (gpm)
0.14
1.15
1.68
0.07
0.07
7.92
0.51
0.26
0.39
0.18
0.14
0.16
0.15
0.50
0.12
17.80
15.19
0.56
6.18
6.84
0.06
0.12
0.39
0.28
0.23
0.36
0.86
0.59
0.65
2.95
1.04
0.19
0.03
N/A
0.12
0.66
1.37
a
1
1
e.
VI
9
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-53
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS1 441 1
C KS1 442 1
C KS1 443 1
C KS1 982 1
Make
HONDA
NISSAN
VW
TOYOTA
Model
ACCORD
MAXIMA
CABRIO
CAMRY
Model
Year
1997
1990
1999
1998
Disp
2.1
3
2
2.2
Test Date
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/18/2004
O
O |
J^J g
c£ "g
H >_-
23
21
20
23
U
£ 1
H &
8.0
8.0
7.7
8.0
&
^~*
a
2
^
3
0.32
0.30
0.25
0.47
e.
g
a
.j
£
H
25.2
26.4
30.9
16.9
O
O
-S
s
e.
-------
Table 4-10. Round 1 Driveaway Test Results
CTR TST ID
D KS1 036 1
D KS1 095 1
D KS1 096 1
D KS1 097 1
D KS1 124 1
D KS1 134 1
D KS1 138 1
D KS1 149 1
D KS1 200 1
D KS1 203 1
D KS1 254 1
D KS1 282 1
D KS1 317 1
D KS1 386 1
D KS1 1012 1
Make
JEEP
BUICK
SUBARU
FORD
FORD
NISSAN
CHRYSLER
CADILLAC
FORD
OLDSMOBILE
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
NISSAN
Model
WRANGLER
LESABRE
OUTBACK LEGACY
THUNDERBIRD
ESCORT
SENTRA
LEBARON
CIMMARON
TEMPO
NINETY EIGHT REGENCY
SABLE
DELTA 88
CUSTOM CRUISER STATI
CAPRICE CLASSIC WAGO
MAXIMA
Model
Year
1995
1989
1996
1988
2002
1994
1983
1986
1986
1985
1997
1991
1984
1987
1992
Disp
2.5
3.8
2.2
3.8
2
1.6
2.6
2.8
2.3
3.8
3
3.8
5
5
3
Test Date
7/23/2004
8/2/2004
7/29/2004
8/5/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
8/12/2004
8/13/2004
8/24/2004
8/24/2004
9/2/2004
9/10/2004
9/15/2004
9/14/2004
8/25/2004
"3
_e
1
1
556
550
421
371
523
347
362
366
426
150
298
229
492
602
449
Test Distance (miles)
64.5
17.8
23.8
35.8
42.4
30.4
13.5
59.4
28.3
29.6
66.8
41.3
23.0
26.8
33.5
Fuel Used (gal)
3.70
0.86
0.77
1.05
1.58
0.85
0.80
2.21
1.32
0.39
3.13
1.39
1.44
1.49
0.02
Test FE (mpg)
17.5
20.7
30.7
34.2
26.9
35.8
16.9
26.9
21.5
75.1
21.3
29.7
16.0
18.0
2009.8
Composite CO2 (gpm)
503.02
416.51
275.02
253.07
326.00
245.41
491.50
326.98
393.78
116.41
408.45
296.47
478.21
449.92
2.20
ex
o"
U
QJ
1
8
O
4.25
7.66
9.44
4.95
4.43
3.13
23.78
2.74
13.22
1.14
6.59
2.49
38.73
26.56
0.02
Composite NOx (gpm)
0.40
1.09
0.91
0.84
0.15
0.17
1.51
0.74
1.19
0.38
1.19
1.17
5.48
7.85
0.00
Composite THC (gpm)
0.15
0.54
0.24
0.42
0.05
0.14
0.49
0.40
0.35
0.06
0.19
0.21
6.21
1.64
0.00
O
1
1
CO
X
X
X
4-55
-------
A fuel economy comparison of Round 1 conditioning runs and LA92 drive cycle tests
performed on the dynamometer is presented in Figure 4-13 (with a 1:1 line shown for reference).
Appendices F and L provides formulas for calculating fuel economy from both the dynamometer
and the PEMS. Results identified as "suspicious" in Tables 4-8 and 4-9 are excluded from
Figure 4-13.
Scatter Plot of Average Fuel Economy (mfea/galton)
60
30
50
0 10 20 30 40
SEMTECH CondlUonhfl Test Fuel Economy (mpg)
/preJ1/KanBaBC«y//^alyBia/Round1/SumPied_DynoaaB 25JUL06 1018
Figure 4-13. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer
Testing Fuel Economy for Round 1
A fuel economy comparison of the driveaway tests and the LA92 dynamometer tests
performed during Round 1 is shown in Figure 4-14, and Figure 4-15 provides a by-vehicle
comparison of Round 1 condition run vs. driveaway test fuel economy. Again, 1:1 lines are
provided for reference, and all "suspect" results are excluded from these figures. These figures
tend to reveal lower fuel economy determinations as measured by the PEMS in comparison with
dynamometer measurements. This difference could be attributed to testing discrepancies such as
how closely the laboratory LA92 drive cycle approximates the driving pattern and loads
encountered with real-word driving. The difference could also be in part due to measurement
discrepancies between the two systems, such as errors or bias in determining the true exhaust
mass flow rate or errors or bias in the exhaust gas concentration measurements. Examination of
comparison of results of tests using similar measurement systems but different driving patterns
(such as shown in Figure 4-15) helps illustrate the influence of testing variations, and
examination of comparison of results of tests using identical driving patterns but different
measurement systems (such as shown in Figures 4-12 and 4-16) helps illustrate the difference in
results as measured by two different systems (PEMS vs. dynamometer).
4-56
-------
Scatter Plot of Average Rial Economy (mlesfeallon)
10
20 30 40
SEMTECH DrtreAway Fuel Economy (mpg)
A^/KamaiClly/^aly>l^oiMioVSum[)rl/Sw_Dynojas 25JUL06 1021
Figure 4-14. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel
Economy for Round 1
Scatter Plot of Average Fuel Economy (mlesfeallon)
10
V
20 30 40
SEMTECH DrtveAway Fuel Economy (mpg)
/piDj1/Kar«a«Clly/^aly>l^oiMioVSim[)rl/s««_Dynojas 25JUL06 1021
Figure 4-15. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Conditioning Run Fuel
Economy for Round 1
4-57
-------
As previously indicated, an attempt was made to collect fuel and oil samples from all
study vehicles. Occasionally, anti-siphon devices prevented collection of fuel samples from
certain study vehicles. All fuel and oil samples were sent to the USEPA's National Vehicle and
Fuel Emissions Laboratory for analysis. No oil samples were analyzed during the study
(subsequent analysis is expected). Results of all fuel analysis performed prior to April 2006
were included in the MSOD data submission for this study and are shown in Table 4-11. Results
of fuels analysis performed after April 2006 were not included in the MSOD submission (and are
not shown in Table 4-11) but are included in Appendix FF (KC_fuels_analysis_complete.pdf)
for reference.
4-58
-------
Table 4-11. Fuel Analysis Results from Round 1 Vehicle Samples
Laboratory Fuel
Batch ID
13619
13620
13621
13622
13623
13624
13625
13626
13627
13632
13633
13634
13636
13649
13652
13653
13654
13655
13656
13657
13658
13659
13661
13662
Vehicle ID
KS1 181
KS1 068
KS1 003
KS1 330
KS1 148
KS1 044
KS1 151
KS1 082
KS1 189
KS1 132
KS1 432
KS1 439
KS1 051
KS1 160
KS1 121
KS1 369
KS1 355
KS1 024
KS1 430
KS1 108
KS1 297
KS1 389
KS1 335
KS1 399
a.
^o.
•_
.3
Ul
175
73
210
75
150
199
166
107
94
79
83
130
215
159
73
138
23
112
38
159
106
174
67
153
-4^
a
'3
0.
01]
a
'3
PQ
."s
-4^
'S £"
HH ^^
102
100
94
101
102
100
99
100
102
95
92
102
99
102
104
103
100
101
102
100
103
97
10% Distillation Point
(F)
138
127
148
143
133
143
141
142
129
123
145
138
145
145
161
142
146
146
142
141
129
50% Distillation Point
(F)
228
218
206
225
223
222
222
223
223
217
221
226
223
231
227
228
224
223
225
224
222
212
90% Distillation Point
(F)
329
341
333
346
334
332
340
339
338
343
341
329
331
355
332
318
338
337
347
330
342
329
£
-*j
a
'3
0.
•o
a
^
419
431
431
435
424
416
445
422
426
426
429
413
414
427
419
399
424
442
451
423
435
426
Specific Gravity at 60
F
0.7588
0.7504
0.7381
0.7566
0.7578
0.7541
0.7506
0.7621
0.7576
0.7574
0.7491
0.7507
0.7581
0.7541
0.7653
0.7599
0.7496
0.7542
0.7485
0.7524
0.7573
0.7566
0.7539
0.7421
to
o
VO
-fcj
«
HH
0.
<
V)
I
OK
OK
>>
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.47
0
0.2
0
11.47
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
->
H
o>
•4-^
«
a
o>
OK
>>
M
0
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
ETHANOL
NONE
NONE
NONE
ETHANOL
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
Total Recovery (mL)
97.8
98.2
97.7
97.9
98.1
97.7
97.8
97.7
97.5
97.3
97.3
97.7
97.6
97.9
97.8
97.5
97.7
97.8
97.7
97.9
97.5
98.1
3
£
0
7.6
12.7
8.3
10
9.5
8
9.7
8
8.7
6.9
9.3
9.1
8.3
8.4
10.4
8.1
2.4
10.1
3.7
10.3
10
8
10.7
9.4
Saturates (Vol %)
56.9
57.2
65
57.6
55.6
58.6
60.8
56
57.4
74
60.3
58.6
57.7
59.6
52.9
56
69.6
58.5
63.3
59.5
57.3
58.1
57.1
62.6
Aromatics (Vol %)
35.5
30.1
26.7
32.4
34.9
33.4
29.5
36
33.9
19.1
30.4
32.3
34
32
36.7
35.9
28
31.4
33
30.2
32.7
33.9
32.2
28
4-59
-------
Laboratory Fuel
Batch ID
13663
13726
13727
13728
13729
13730
13731
13732
13733
13734
13738
13823
13824
13825
13826
13839
13840
13841
13842
14277
14284
14289
Vehicle ID
KS1 139
KS1 083
KS1 123
KS1 005
KS1 306
KS1 109
KS1 107
KS1 153
KS1 033
KS1 384
KS1 419
KS1 173
KS1 169
KS1 367
KS1 002
KS1 358
KS1 308
KS1 317
KS1 319
KS1 299
KS1 007
KS1 004
a.
^o.
•_
.3
Ul
115
43
313
70
154
117
146
133
106
134
41
170
166
141
179
149
174
98
48
13
55
321
+J
_c
'3
0.
OK
a
'3
pa
."s
-4^
'5 £"
HH **-s
102
98
94
102
101
104
102
102
102
96
93
101
99
98
106
102
99
105
103
99
98
103
10% Distillation Point
(F)
140
151
131
141
144
148
145
142
141
134
139
147
143
132
148
141
146
144
140
155
144
147
50% Distillation Point
(F)
224
227
213
225
226
225
222
224
225
219
226
226
225
221
226
225
227
230
223
227
232
227
90% Distillation Point
(F)
343
322
334
348
330
335
332
336
340
331
318
342
340
341
332
334
331
350
350
319
339
334
S
-*j
_c
'3
0.
•o
w
412
406
411
428
415
432
426
423
438
416
406
433
453
433
422
418
418
420
437
402
428
422
Specific Gravity at 60
F
0.75
0.7468
0.7348
0.7518
0.761
0.7536
0.7552
0.7584
0.7554
0.7505
0.7416
0.7585
0.7526
0.7543
0.7575
0.7555
0.7603
0.7708
0.7538
0.745
0.7614
0.7506
to
s
-fcj
«
HH
0.
<
VI
•_
OK
->
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
->
H
o>
-^
«
it
OK
>->
3
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
ETHANOL
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
Total Recovery (mL)
97.9
98
97.6
97.8
98.2
98.2
98.1
98.1
97.8
97.9
97.5
98
97.7
98.2
98.2
98
97.6
98.1
98.2
97.5
97.5
97.5
3
£
it
s
3
'vi
&
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.9
1
1
3
£
VI
VI
O
-J
1.3
1.1
1.5
1.3
1
0.9
1
1
.4
.3
.7
.2
.5
1
1
1.1
1.6
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.5
1.5
•o ^
'3 ^
«a
6.6
7
8.6
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.5
6.9
6.7
8.2
8.2
6.3
6.6
7.3
6.5
7.2
6.2
6.4
6.8
6.4
6.5
6.4
^
"3
>
VI
a
it
0
7.6
2.3
10
12.1
9.7
8.6
8.6
8.3
9.6
8
2.1
9.5
9.5
9.4
7.8
8.9
7.7
10.6
11.7
2.1
10.5
8.7
Saturates (Vol %)
62.6
69.8
68.8
58.5
55.1
61.4
59.6
56.4
59.4
61.5
71.6
57.4
61
58.4
57.9
58.1
56.6
48.6
58
70.7
54.1
63.4
Aromatics (Vol %)
29.8
27.9
21.2
29.5
35.2
30
31.8
35.3
31.1
30.5
26.3
33.1
29.5
32.2
34.3
33
35.7
40.8
30.3
27.2
35.5
27.9
4-60
-------
4.4.2 Summary of Round 2 Regulated Emissions Measurements
As with the Round 1 data, regulated pollutant measurements from the dynamometer are
based on speed and emissions time-aligned second-by-second data, integrated for each phase.
The PEMS test results were calculated by using speed and emissions time-alignment
methodology developed by Sensors, Inc. Table 4-12 provides a side-by-side comparison of
Round 2 PEMS vs. dynamometer composite results for each test (excluding control runs).
Percentage difference between the two systems is shown for each run, and results with overall
differences greater than 100% are indicated with bold-faced font. Out of 279 tests, six report a
difference greater than 100% for at least one pollutant. Results from DRI's gravimetrically-
collected PM2 5 measurements are also shown in Table 4-12 for reference. Additional
information and results from particulate matter measurements are provided in Section 4.5
Comparison of phase-specific and total composite emission rates in the data shows a
relatively good correlation between the PEMS and dynamometer methods of measurement. A
composite emission comparison is provided in this section, and complete (by-phase) results are
provided in Appendices G and H for both Rounds 1 and 2 of the study. As with the Round 1
PEMS vs. dynamometer comparison data shown in Table 4-8, analysis of results of future
studies, such as the "Measurement Allowance for In-Use Testing" study being conducted in 2006
at Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, may help illustrate any discrepancies
between results measured using these two systems.
As with the Round 1 data, the last two columns of Table 4-12 indicate dyno and PEMS
records which may have suspicious regulated gaseous pollutant results, based on review of test
data. For the dynamometer data, an "x" in the "dyno data suspect" column indicates either a test
anomaly was noted in the onsite test log, or some issue was identified with the dynamometer
data during subsequent data analysis, which could influence the overall test result. Some
examples of data issues that would be noted include tests for which part or all of the real-time
data was improperly collected or voided, tests where incorrect dynamometer loading was
applied, tests where real-time sensors were saturated (pegged at maximum value), tests with
equipment failures that would affect overall results, or tests where significant drive trace
violations occurred. This review was only applied to dynamometer measurements collected
during the study. Detailed notes pertaining to QC review of all dynamometer measurements are
provided in Appendices S and V.
All Round 2 PEMS data was also analyzed to identify missing information and indicators
of potentially invalid results. This analysis involved performing a comparison of exhaust mass
flow rates for each test with those of other vehicles with a similar engine displacement,
comparison of exhaust temperatures of each tests with the exhaust temperatures of other vehicles
of similar engine displacement, review of exhaust dilution levels (percentage CO + CO2 in
exhaust), review of ambient temperature measured during testing and review of test durations,
distances, and measured fuel economy. PEMS tests with highly suspicious results are indicated
with an "x" in the "PEMS data suspect" in Table 4-12, and detailed notes collected during
review of all Round 2 dyno PEMS tests are provided in Appendix P.
4-61
-------
Table 4-12. By-Test Comparison of Round 2 PEMS vs. Dynamometer Composite Results
RunID
84393
84394
84396
84397
84398
84399
84401
84402
84403
84407
84409
84411
84412
84413
84414
84415
84416
84419
84420
84421
84422
84424
84425
84426
84427
84428
84430
£
a.
1
37.9
39.2
39.1
39.3
32.8
32.7
30.1
29.4
12.2
23.9
17.9
18.4
17.8
18.4
27.2
28.4
28.2
34.1
30.4
34.9
37.4
41.3
43.9
39.4
45.2
46.3
46.7
g
70.6
69.1
65.5
65.8
45.7
43.4
41.3
39.2
41.7
32.5
43.5
43.9
44.8
47.0
40.1
33.7
36.0
30.8
39.4
36.4
38.5
41.5
39.3
61.8
58.3
56.5
56.0
HC (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
0.58
0.51
0.27
8.56
0.38
0.46
0.59
1.12
1.90
1.27
0.61
0.52
0.28
0.09
0.29
0.19
0.44
0.19
0.23
1.69
0.27
2.40
0.20
0.10
0.35
0.80
0
>>
0
0.34
0.31
0.30
4.94
0.20
0.25
0.34
1.02
0.60
2.90
0.50
0.53
0.56
1.87
0.12
0.33
0.19
0.44
0.25
0.24
1.50
0.24
2.21
0.22
0.11
0.38
0.63
%
b
S
41.85
39.74
-9.58
42.28
47.50
46.16
42.21
9.08
68.17
-128.74
18.80
-1.01
-100.49
N/A
-22.41
-13.68
-3.82
-0.92
-31.96
-5.06
11.37
9.70
7.81
-9.28
-14.50
-9.34
21.14
CO (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
6.07
9.95
9.56
123.99
5.30
12.26
8.18
20.92
9.31
39.00
7.85
2.42
6.64
1.48
7.68
7.44
6.61
5.40
2.45
19.07
4.69
18.67
6.68
0.92
5.61
20.97
0
>>
Q
3.17
5.26
8.69
73.51
3.11
6.68
4.57
17.36
5.20
24.18
8.41
5.39
9.57
33.86
1.59
8.11
6.63
6.88
5.15
2.28
16.83
4.02
16.01
6.48
0.86
5.57
16.13
%
b
S
47.69
47.13
9.11
40.71
41.34
45.54
44.13
17.01
44.18
38.01
-7.24
-122.96
-44.23
N/A
-7.25
-5.65
10.81
-4.12
4.66
7.00
11.73
14.20
14.26
3.04
6.70
0.78
23.09
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
0.33
0.47
1.34
4.28
0.27
0.49
1.39
2.85
0.45
5.20
0.94
0.54
0.21
0.20
1.47
0.10
0.60
0.39
0.43
5.74
2.43
6.07
0.11
0.14
0.80
1.78
0
>i
Q
0.30
0.30
1.38
3.54
0.16
0.29
0.95
2.61
0.33
4.58
1.15
0.84
0.47
1.40
0.11
1.62
0.08
0.52
0.35
0.41
5.25
2.37
5.47
0.10
0.13
0.71
1.74
%
b
S
8.13
36.07
-3.43
17.35
42.16
40.47
31.21
8.24
26.27
11.91
-22.43
-55.84
-123.70
N/A
45.32
-10.27
16.95
12.90
10.31
5.54
8.63
2.62
9.85
15.51
6.31
11.21
1.94
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
%
W
a.
768.10
855.25
371.92
808.69
717.85
720.62
811.75
379.47
789.19
557.01
434.76
166.12
171.91
452.20
696.66
321.06
470.93
469.59
394.82
547.06
597.83
574.97
346.19
378.39
429.14
449.98
0
>>
Q
449.54
530.00
385.82
559.58
402.69
399.66
495.01
337.87
474.11
367.97
432.62
384.08
305.99
700.36
449.79
713.39
281.73
442.39
379.66
363.08
522.20
579.49
532.63
306.34
353.87
418.70
390.15
%
b
S
41.47
38.03
-3.74
30.80
43.90
44.54
39.02
10.96
39.93
33.94
0.49
-131.21
-78.00
N/A
0.53
-2.40
12.25
6.06
19.15
8.04
4.54
3.07
7.36
11.51
6.48
2.43
13.30
1
>ri
ei
%
0.
2.48
21.09
10.49
80.42
5.41
2.82
4.75
20.31
7.52
151.32
4.54
83.29
3.09
140.91
2.56
27.03
3.84
4.29
17.05
4.21
18.68
13.91
28.28
6.91
1.45
17.01
23.64
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
4-62
-------
RunID
84431
84432
84433
84436
84437
84438
84439
84442
84443
84444
84445
84446
84448
84449
84450
84452
84453
84455
84456
84457
84458
84459
84462
84463
84464
84465
84467
84468
84469
fe
a.
1
47.1
44.7
48.3
56.3
60.1
40.3
40.6
40.7
41.5
25.0
24.1
23.6
24.7
25.8
24.9
46.3
50.1
54.9
55.4
42.2
45.0
45.4
42.9
34.7
37.2
37.9
37.2
36.6
37.6
i
54.9
60.5
57.4
50.5
47.0
60.9
60.1
59.6
61.0
32.6
33.4
35.8
38.9
39.0
41.1
49.6
47.8
42.7
44.1
59.8
52.6
51.6
50.9
62.5
61.2
56.0
55.0
46.3
43.0
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
0.86
0.41
0.30
0.38
0.27
0.11
0.37
0.28
0.59
0.27
0.26
0.80
0.44
0.44
3.30
0.28
0.46
0.23
2.36
0.49
0.71
0.45
3.56
0.25
0.61
0.21
2.11
0.22
1.44
0
>>
Q
1.15
0.41
0.28
0.36
0.30
0.11
0.39
0.30
0.60
0.31
0.24
0.76
0.44
0.44
3.09
0.27
0.53
0.24
1.46
0.49
0.68
0.43
3.32
0.25
0.61
0.23
1.61
0.23
1.38
te
S
S
-34.14
-0.90
8.12
4.63
-11.63
-6.65
-5.50
-7.82
-1.63
-16.88
7.93
5.05
-0.74
-1.09
6.52
1.54
-14.69
-5.82
37.99
0.82
3.84
5.22
6.67
-2.61
-0.08
-6.50
23.58
-6.20
3.90
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
10.00
3.05
4.68
10.11
2.61
2.10
6.03
2.61
6.72
1.21
2.37
5.09
5.98
8.05
30.51
6.99
3.80
5.13
41.02
10.07
17.01
9.34
99.70
9.23
6.11
3.35
21.89
3.57
17.70
0
>>
Q
12.64
2.91
3.58
9.28
2.58
2.13
5.65
2.62
6.60
1.19
2.18
5.17
6.21
7.91
27.69
6.26
4.07
4.62
25.46
6.93
16.79
8.73
99.11
7.51
5.93
3.32
17.60
3.54
15.24
la
Q
S
-26.42
4.60
23.62
8.18
1.23
-1.58
6.25
-0.41
1.78
1.52
8.06
-1.45
-3.83
1.77
9.24
10.43
-7.28
9.90
37.94
31.18
1.34
6.54
0.59
18.65
2.89
0.89
19.61
0.69
13.89
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
1.25
0.32
0.35
0.77
0.35
0.13
1.71
0.38
2.15
0.19
0.11
0.73
0.44
1.15
5.37
1.04
0.95
0.45
1.57
1.68
1.38
2.01
1.19
0.66
0.84
0.88
1.83
0.73
2.62
0
>i
Q
1.36
0.29
0.32
0.64
0.34
0.10
1.63
0.35
1.93
0.20
0.24
0.62
0.41
1.13
4.81
1.09
1.07
0.44
1.53
2.02
1.30
1.84
1.15
0.77
0.88
0.92
1.81
0.78
2.58
la
Q
S
-8.23
11.88
9.64
16.89
2.37
24.91
4.60
5.88
10.21
-7.26
-114.00
14.44
7.77
2.12
10.33
-4.82
-12.76
1.86
2.49
-20.25
6.03
8.16
3.20
-17.10
-4.78
-3.81
0.88
-6.68
1.46
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
487.00
337.72
537.00
540.07
431.28
469.97
479.21
451.12
348.42
439.68
252.55
537.87
535.31
493.77
454.71
472.58
382.63
439.62
598.07
494.92
511.47
500.59
393.09
378.72
470.42
506.96
408.71
485.25
454.60
0
^s
0
510.38
300.92
486.68
491.97
430.76
439.08
463.43
471.80
331.88
449.71
424.38
509.89
522.17
473.77
424.96
459.17
429.73
427.58
487.81
492.17
489.03
468.54
391.90
366.52
445.46
523.56
360.11
498.02
441.30
IS
0
S
-4.80
10.90
9.37
8.91
0.12
6.57
3.29
-4.59
4.75
-2.28
-68.03
5.20
2.45
4.05
6.54
2.84
-12.31
2.74
18.44
0.56
4.39
6.40
0.30
3.22
5.31
-3.28
11.89
-2.63
2.93
"Sfc
>ri
r*
s
a.
27.39
6.55
27.54
3.87
2.08
2.68
7.32
2.53
19.00
18.07
3.24
30.30
22.75
10.15
20.88
6.07
6.53
1.83
37.30
22.22
19.93
4.70
38.05
101.18
32.94
188.71
23.32
5.22
138.65
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
X
4-63
-------
RunID
84470
84472
84473
84474
84475
84477
84479
84482
84483
84484
84485
84487
84488
84489
84490
84492
84493
84494
84495
84497
84498
84499
84500
84503
84504
84505
84507
84508
84509
fe
a.
1
38.0
40.0
33.3
35.9
36.8
39.4
35.0
39.0
41.1
40.7
38.9
44.1
35.4
34.9
36.9
41.4
34.5
42.9
47.9
53.8
43.7
49.7
55.1
49.2
51.3
54.3
58.9
34.6
34.0
i
42.9
40.9
72.6
67.1
65.2
59.8
78.3
70.1
58.3
56.8
59.2
46.8
65.4
63.0
55.0
39.7
58.9
52.4
49.4
43.3
55.8
51.9
46.1
45.0
43.9
40.1
27.1
63.0
60.4
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
61.47
8.72
0.20
1.32
1.75
1.45
0.38
1.11
0.41
1.06
1.28
1.01
0.19
0.73
1.13
2.83
0.05
0.21
0.38
0.36
0.32
0.41
0.51
0.11
0.37
0.62
2.80
0.45
2.37
0
•?~.
Q
16.14
4.26
0.19
1.08
1.61
1.49
0.39
1.11
0.38
1.04
1.10
0.96
0.19
0.67
0.97
1.46
0.06
0.22
0.32
0.37
0.28
0.47
0.53
0.11
0.38
0.62
2.51
0.47
2.13
te
S
S
73.74
51.17
6.29
18.73
7.93
-2.81
-2.92
0.20
7.15
1.84
14.03
5.16
0.06
7.05
14.34
48.50
-21.26
-7.65
15.36
-1.41
11.39
-14.08
-4.52
-4.57
-2.73
0.45
10.61
-3.24
10.23
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
237.74
82.10
3.63
14.67
31.84
57.06
5.78
13.01
4.48
12.85
28.15
50.98
3.56
3.44
28.26
23.16
0.63
5.27
7.18
8.60
4.33
8.72
6.67
1.07
3.07
7.69
20.14
11.38
19.49
0
>>
Q
210.51
59.14
3.17
10.62
31.35
58.25
5.43
12.75
3.99
12.39
25.09
45.73
3.00
3.12
24.95
20.95
0.51
4.58
5.67
7.42
3.33
8.90
6.06
0.74
2.82
6.63
16.15
11.61
17.24
la
Q
S
11.46
27.96
12.64
27.61
1.54
-2.07
6.13
2.06
11.06
3.61
10.90
10.31
15.59
9.30
11.74
9.54
19.16
13.00
20.96
13.72
23.08
-1.98
9.13
30.79
8.40
13.74
19.79
-2.02
11.56
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
2.08
1.91
0.87
1.30
0.84
1.98
0.78
8.32
0.43
8.43
1.04
2.86
0.79
3.34
1.00
1.70
0.03
1.22
0.55
0.61
0.43
0.34
1.98
0.19
0.42
1.73
5.83
0.60
4.05
0
>i
Q
2.09
2.02
0.83
1.22
0.85
1.80
0.76
6.97
0.41
7.05
1.02
2.86
0.84
3.12
1.02
1.63
0.03
1.19
0.52
0.55
0.42
0.32
1.89
0.20
0.38
1.69
5.12
0.59
3.49
la
Q
S
-0.45
-5.95
4.29
5.99
-1.29
9.30
2.12
16.17
4.39
16.31
2.08
-0.07
-7.20
6.51
-1.61
4.18
-15.71
2.01
5.29
10.10
2.91
4.16
4.34
-5.28
10.24
2.18
12.15
0.72
13.71
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
571.61
544.44
590.07
322.60
408.81
439.23
499.39
520.14
386.15
511.04
624.86
432.14
482.94
414.93
609.41
581.85
473.60
398.22
390.95
593.97
491.62
349.35
401.17
477.64
442.28
465.15
443.27
263.38
586.33
0
^s
0
509.39
489.49
574.45
268.88
398.80
421.54
492.78
510.14
352.43
506.80
571.32
420.65
472.03
385.26
556.44
544.35
462.63
375.23
363.23
564.85
470.13
348.21
409.04
476.38
434.87
439.47
401.66
273.72
516.86
IS
0
S
10.88
10.09
2.65
16.65
2.45
4.03
1.32
1.92
8.73
0.83
8.57
2.66
2.26
7.15
8.69
6.44
2.32
5.77
7.09
4.90
4.37
0.32
-1.96
0.26
1.67
5.52
9.39
-3.93
11.85
"Sfc
>ri
fi
s
a.
332.68
91.37
13.22
63.87
43.59
74.32
7.99
14.10
5.01
8.66
20.05
22.53
2.58
15.40
3.84
52.72
1.09
2.75
2.08
24.40
10.10
4.66
4.82
2.80
2.46
8.63
2.44
2.69
14.08
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
X
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
4-64
-------
RunID
84510
84512
84514
84515
84517
84518
84519
84520
84521
84522
84524
84526
84527
84528
84529
84531
84532
84533
84534
84537
84538
84539
84541
84542
84543
84546
84547
84548
84550
fe
a.
1
34.9
31.0
27.0
28.2
27.7
28.7
29.6
26.8
28.2
29.3
33.8
35.7
24.3
31.4
35.2
40.3
34.9
39.8
44.1
40.9
45.6
47.9
49.8
44.6
49.5
47.0
48.6
50.5
53.3
i
55.5
57.6
56.1
58.1
62.7
62.8
61.7
52.3
85.1
103.1
94.9
86.6
35.3
24.0
20.7
17.3
2.4
1.3
5.1
63.8
58.5
57.4
68.3
61.3
52.5
63.1
59.8
53.6
42.2
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
3.04
72.24
0.29
0.41
0.40
0.60
1.41
0.13
0.24
0.32
0.41
0.77
0.80
0.63
1.41
0.88
0.21
0.34
0.59
0.30
0.14
0.63
0.79
0.73
0.24
0.44
0.34
0.45
2.54
0
•?~.
Q
2.74
17.97
0.21
0.33
0.40
0.58
1.13
0.13
0.25
0.29
0.41
0.79
0.65
0.61
1.10
0.73
0.21
0.31
0.58
0.30
0.14
0.61
0.70
0.74
0.24
0.37
0.38
0.47
2.50
te
S
S
10.01
75.13
27.96
18.12
1.17
3.37
19.81
2.15
-3.02
8.16
1.08
-2.02
18.63
3.21
21.71
17.71
2.88
7.48
2.46
0.41
1.19
3.38
11.03
-1.63
3.65
16.37
-11.72
-4.13
1.96
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
34.42
226.14
1.49
9.98
3.58
9.81
15.74
1.20
5.12
3.42
6.75
9.82
12.57
10.91
22.32
22.05
3.57
4.98
5.45
5.61
3.56
8.76
16.98
15.74
5.25
7.32
3.87
4.20
18.43
0
>>
Q
31.65
179.00
1.26
8.38
3.62
9.26
11.19
1.07
5.04
2.88
6.58
9.29
10.28
8.79
20.87
22.00
3.84
4.21
5.20
4.48
2.77
7.49
13.57
14.81
4.03
5.51
3.78
3.79
17.53
la
Q
S
8.03
20.84
15.78
16.04
-1.16
5.58
28.88
11.02
1.47
15.74
2.45
5.38
18.22
19.44
6.53
0.20
-7.34
15.51
4.59
20.10
22.15
14.54
20.10
5.91
23.30
24.78
2.40
9.87
4.88
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
4.06
0.68
0.26
0.80
0.70
0.74
3.67
0.18
0.47
0.41
1.22
1.08
0.67
1.50
1.55
1.70
0.28
1.15
0.73
0.82
1.11
0.82
1.29
1.06
0.85
0.74
0.42
0.63
2.07
0
>i
Q
3.75
0.70
0.21
0.71
0.65
0.75
3.19
0.18
0.48
0.41
1.27
1.20
0.55
1.58
1.46
1.71
0.26
1.07
0.71
0.73
1.10
0.75
1.05
1.08
0.75
0.72
0.42
0.63
2.07
la
Q
S
7.74
-3.27
20.71
11.55
6.72
-0.43
13.21
1.34
-1.58
-0.57
-4.58
-10.74
17.53
-5.22
5.80
-0.63
5.17
7.11
2.91
10.01
0.86
7.89
18.26
-2.29
11.28
3.25
0.45
-0.47
0.06
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
648.26
437.15
478.55
485.14
508.30
441.86
553.44
482.03
400.40
536.22
361.99
507.29
743.67
526.88
390.26
354.69
500.88
693.60
402.44
587.41
499.99
612.67
542.43
462.55
587.66
533.03
299.57
424.38
509.46
0
^s
0
625.32
374.06
470.46
403.43
511.52
435.76
465.20
474.17
404.90
505.22
351.43
506.58
650.11
526.18
386.18
351.92
507.07
670.09
412.17
533.31
509.84
589.85
467.28
478.70
534.29
500.90
305.26
427.29
524.94
IS
0
S
3.54
14.43
1.69
16.84
-0.63
1.38
15.95
1.63
-1.12
5.78
2.92
0.14
12.58
0.13
1.05
0.78
-1.24
3.39
-2.42
9.21
-1.97
3.73
13.85
-3.49
9.08
6.03
-1.90
-0.68
-3.04
"Sfc
>ri
r*
s
a.
22.33
181.76
3.85
5.43
21.76
2.69
23.01
2.68
2.60
5.74
4.26
52.17
15.39
133.10
56.52
18.61
5.81
6.46
28.13
3.18
1.07
3.95
6.33
4.91
3.98
2.72
17.67
2.84
22.27
PEMS
DATASuspect
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
X
4-65
-------
RunID
84551
84552
84554
84556
84557
84558
84560
84562
84563
84564
84566
84567
84568
84569
84570
84572
84573
84574
84575
84577
84580
84581
84582
84584
84587
84588
84589
84591
84592
fe
a.
1
37.9
39.5
44.3
35.8
40.7
43.5
48.8
33.3
38.5
40.1
44.8
46.6
45.0
45.1
45.4
46.6
36.5
37.7
39.0
42.0
45.3
45.5
47.2
42.5
43.9
48.3
52.6
41.4
45.5
i
56.4
51.8
38.0
54.9
42.4
36.3
36.1
47.8
39.6
36.7
32.7
30.4
61.8
62.4
64.5
65.6
71.8
67.3
65.5
62.2
45.8
45.8
40.4
53.9
45.7
40.6
36.0
51.6
46.2
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
0.23
0.16
0.76
0.27
0.20
0.96
0.32
0.11
0.17
0.25
0.50
12.49
0.74
0.32
0.46
0.39
0.22
0.34
0.92
0.21
0.47
2.09
0.32
0.68
2.35
0.12
0.36
11.23
0
>>
Q
0.25
0.17
0.67
0.27
0.21
0.65
0.24
0.10
0.17
0.26
0.51
12.44
0.61
0.30
0.33
0.42
0.22
0.35
0.89
0.22
0.19
0.40
2.07
0.31
0.64
1.78
0.14
0.36
5.76
te
S
S
-5.13
-4.75
12.19
0.01
-6.60
32.26
26.41
8.87
-1.58
-4.02
-3.48
0.40
17.42
5.85
28.04
-6.51
1.08
-1.62
2.90
-2.95
N/A
15.18
0.99
1.39
5.01
24.39
-14.05
-0.37
48.72
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
4.64
3.13
10.46
4.32
2.07
6.70
4.01
0.95
2.27
3.44
7.86
260.54
11.84
7.14
12.20
7.76
3.37
8.06
19.86
8.18
7.08
26.27
5.25
4.86
49.00
1.51
7.94
83.51
0
>>
Q
4.14
3.27
9.22
4.12
2.06
5.77
2.59
0.78
1.87
3.46
7.98
246.30
9.03
6.38
9.09
8.00
3.08
7.80
18.51
7.16
3.12
6.24
24.39
4.62
4.85
44.23
1.50
7.16
75.85
la
Q
S
10.93
-4.44
11.84
4.69
0.85
13.78
35.41
18.04
17.50
-0.66
-1.52
5.47
23.74
10.61
25.52
-3.08
8.58
3.24
6.79
12.48
N/A
11.87
7.16
11.96
0.08
9.74
0.90
9.78
9.18
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
0.25
0.24
1.44
0.83
0.36
0.40
0.45
0.12
0.14
0.71
0.47
0.25
1.43
0.88
0.54
1.07
1.04
0.91
1.55
2.10
0.79
1.44
0.36
1.04
1.51
0.18
1.74
2.31
0
>i
Q
0.24
0.20
1.44
0.83
0.34
0.37
0.31
0.10
0.14
0.67
0.49
0.40
1.39
0.88
0.49
1.10
1.01
0.89
1.54
1.67
0.61
0.78
1.37
0.32
1.12
1.53
0.17
1.63
1.89
la
Q
S
5.00
15.25
0.05
-0.83
5.28
8.26
31.46
18.30
-3.94
5.01
-5.61
-60.56
2.55
-0.74
9.15
-2.23
3.09
2.57
1.06
20.48
N/A
1.06
4.99
12.05
-7.43
-1.78
4.87
6.52
18.29
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
509.68
488.16
639.27
481.60
511.55
569.08
450.99
543.05
524.23
477.35
452.12
413.85
400.19
444.84
447.77
397.89
526.77
413.90
446.92
521.50
429.74
377.35
395.96
471.10
656.38
305.59
546.21
379.45
0
^s
0
520.95
483.63
609.71
493.01
503.02
547.54
316.54
503.15
527.05
483.15
466.10
400.09
391.76
430.50
392.10
408.23
519.34
416.33
439.91
503.33
510.78
414.46
377.87
390.46
486.39
634.10
305.68
549.47
344.28
IS
0
S
-2.21
0.93
4.62
-2.37
1.67
3.79
29.81
7.35
-0.54
-1.21
-3.09
3.32
2.11
3.22
12.43
-2.60
1.41
-0.59
1.57
3.48
N/A
3.56
-0.14
1.39
-3.25
3.39
-0.03
-0.60
9.27
"Sfc
>ri
fi
s
a.
5.64
2.04
13.76
4.63
2.70
36.01
6.10
4.39
0.92
5.44
36.75
44.26
4.11
3.37
1.00
3.64
5.03
1.05
5.78
5.97
8.98
1.09
15.57
5.82
12.14
19.30
32.80
21.79
79.12
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
4-66
-------
RunID
84593
84595
84597
84599
84600
84601
84603
84605
84609
84611
84612
84616
84617
84618
84620
84621
84622
84623
84626
84627
84628
84629
84630
84632
84633
84634
84635
84637
84638
fe
a.
1
49.5
36.7
38.4
29.1
32.3
35.8
39.4
45.9
48.8
59.2
42.1
52.9
53.1
50.6
51.8
52.8
37.4
41.1
46.2
47.0
37.9
38.9
40.4
45.0
47.8
51.9
56.5
59.7
42.5
i
43.0
43.7
40.9
43.9
37.6
31.4
42.0
44.8
65.2
41.0
55.2
47.8
46.5
47.7
42.1
35.1
45.9
39.1
35.5
34.9
44.0
38.6
36.1
30.4
46.9
43.8
33.1
23.7
36.3
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
0.14
0.15
0.87
0.58
0.44
5.73
3.78
2.69
5.69
0.40
0.03
0.13
0.35
0.95
5.25
0.56
0.83
1.66
1.21
36.53
0.46
0.40
1.28
40.53
1.42
1.10
1.67
4.13
1.39
0
•?~.
Q
0.13
0.15
0.87
0.57
0.42
4.53
2.85
1.70
3.64
0.43
0.14
0.15
0.34
0.66
2.76
0.51
0.47
0.82
1.20
14.84
0.41
0.40
1.14
15.16
1.29
1.06
1.51
3.78
1.29
te
S
S
5.29
-0.69
0.52
1.69
4.94
20.97
24.43
37.00
36.09
-8.39
-314.48
-14.61
3.65
30.44
47.46
8.09
43.58
50.60
1.14
59.37
11.27
-0.86
10.63
62.60
9.42
3.03
9.17
8.64
6.71
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
3.48
4.76
17.46
3.35
9.23
81.91
12.84
27.17
56.98
5.58
1.19
1.17
6.11
25.04
42.57
8.29
6.99
37.82
35.85
86.27
4.92
6.58
30.95
108.94
63.89
12.48
19.13
73.58
24.27
0
>>
Q
3.30
4.15
17.55
3.28
8.50
61.33
13.40
16.19
44.72
6.11
2.08
0.98
4.92
19.55
21.38
7.47
4.09
18.40
36.13
68.54
4.74
6.78
29.30
88.15
59.03
11.56
16.34
69.22
22.69
la
Q
S
5.05
12.90
-0.53
2.22
7.91
25.13
-4.30
40.41
21.52
-9.52
-75.15
16.13
19.46
21.93
49.77
9.90
41.50
51.36
-0.76
20.55
3.59
-2.98
5.34
19.09
7.59
7.40
14.58
5.92
6.52
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
0.16
1.14
0.46
0.28
1.29
2.89
3.13
2.38
3.05
1.57
0.23
0.25
1.15
3.70
2.00
1.12
0.61
3.75
1.89
3.75
0.32
0.19
0.50
3.73
1.29
3.77
1.45
4.08
1.27
0
>i
Q
0.16
1.13
0.46
0.28
1.24
2.79
3.33
2.57
2.92
1.54
0.55
0.25
1.07
4.04
3.09
1.14
0.43
3.43
1.69
3.72
0.31
0.17
0.51
3.63
1.23
3.14
1.53
3.89
1.34
la
Q
S
-2.91
0.18
0.15
-1.57
4.14
3.50
-6.20
-7.82
4.23
2.16
-140.82
-0.92
6.88
-9.00
-55.00
-1.67
30.43
8.55
10.64
0.70
5.04
12.66
-0.93
2.53
4.64
16.54
-5.37
4.81
-5.69
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
365.10
331.06
355.75
422.68
594.55
529.17
298.54
519.96
589.28
434.32
376.53
457.91
667.77
594.72
478.64
476.73
609.37
564.77
454.01
638.02
576.61
432.73
400.17
659.57
433.92
473.99
481.67
462.42
468.83
0
^s
0
369.05
339.68
354.16
427.98
570.58
478.50
309.04
498.77
488.40
446.87
488.62
466.89
617.99
447.57
416.35
451.38
395.53
357.33
429.85
547.12
582.37
421.14
371.43
567.58
392.32
464.05
469.67
465.32
471.90
IS
0
S
-1.08
-2.60
0.45
-1.25
4.03
9.58
-3.52
4.07
17.12
-2.89
-29.77
-1.96
7.45
24.74
13.01
5.32
35.09
36.73
5.32
14.25
-1.00
2.68
7.18
13.95
9.59
2.10
2.49
-0.63
-0.65
"Sfc
>ri
r*
s
a.
3.38
2.13
12.22
22.84
47.94
7.46
50.99
25.56
5.42
0.75
1.05
5.67
6.31
8.05
4.56
7.62
27.09
19.60
232.12
14.58
5.16
10.56
99.41
23.18
65.85
146.94
2.57
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
4-67
-------
RunID
84639
84640
84642
84643
84644
84645
84646
84648
84649
84650
84653
84655
84656
84658
84659
84660
84661
84662
84663
84665
84666
84667
84668
84669
84670
84672
84673
84674
84675
fe
a.
1
45.6
48.7
55.0
58.5
49.7
56.5
60.7
65.7
40.2
42.5
50.2
49.4
52.0
54.8
55.5
55.6
44.3
47.8
51.4
54.9
56.4
57.8
48.9
53.0
55.9
58.3
60.5
60.7
52.9
i
33.5
32.4
29.7
24.2
42.3
34.2
31.4
24.2
43.9
38.7
27.1
26.0
25.2
24.0
23.7
23.6
50.7
48.7
42.8
34.2
28.3
22.8
37.3
30.7
27.3
24.1
21.4
20.1
28.9
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
0.35
0.27
0.60
1.98
0.23
0.48
0.84
1.11
0.91
0.69
5.79
0.38
0.50
0.85
2.98
1.34
0.32
2.49
1.13
0.61
1.04
7.77
0.17
1.25
0.76
0.42
12.67
3.19
0.33
0
•?~.
Q
0.32
0.26
0.54
1.81
0.21
0.48
0.70
1.09
0.73
0.60
3.91
0.39
0.43
0.86
1.73
1.27
0.29
2.17
0.91
0.58
1.07
6.88
0.17
1.03
0.70
0.41
6.47
2.49
0.34
te
S
S
9.48
4.74
10.79
8.41
8.80
-0.24
16.37
1.27
19.74
12.45
32.47
-1.98
14.22
-1.59
41.88
5.39
11.31
12.94
19.30
5.18
-2.43
11.45
5.37
17.60
8.01
0.99
48.93
21.91
-3.81
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
6.37
9.53
22.01
33.33
3.30
5.28
19.91
21.77
9.82
13.19
89.24
4.75
10.14
12.34
36.83
8.20
4.71
45.92
16.97
12.99
12.48
69.05
2.26
23.53
15.52
7.05
305.06
48.33
5.00
0
>>
Q
5.41
7.92
19.15
29.75
3.17
4.82
15.70
22.08
7.07
11.24
71.68
4.79
7.96
11.18
31.08
7.09
3.67
41.43
12.60
12.07
12.56
65.68
1.92
20.32
14.10
5.91
213.11
42.38
4.86
la
Q
S
15.01
16.84
12.97
10.75
4.12
8.72
21.14
-1.42
28.05
14.73
19.68
-0.74
21.48
9.41
15.61
13.50
22.00
9.79
25.76
7.12
-0.68
4.88
15.33
13.62
9.15
16.20
30.14
12.30
2.74
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
0.71
1.30
1.55
2.78
0.38
0.46
1.42
1.84
0.81
1.51
5.81
1.28
1.28
3.00
2.99
2.85
1.31
5.32
1.57
2.86
2.85
3.27
1.46
2.56
1.22
0.88
2.63
2.56
1.88
0
>i
Q
0.75
1.32
1.49
2.63
0.36
0.48
1.41
1.71
0.71
1.55
5.10
1.28
1.31
2.85
2.72
3.00
1.34
5.01
1.60
2.79
2.89
3.29
1.36
2.70
1.25
0.91
0.65
2.70
1.99
la
Q
S
-5.27
-1.21
3.95
5.24
6.70
-5.01
0.61
7.14
11.96
-2.14
12.17
0.03
-2.76
4.92
9.13
-5.11
-2.20
5.98
-1.56
2.52
-1.38
-0.44
6.90
-5.53
-1.75
-2.93
75.22
-5.16
-5.81
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
357.61
531.04
426.25
368.63
539.31
448.69
437.79
530.95
562.10
481.95
737.72
484.11
452.44
401.29
437.14
466.47
448.87
558.34
441.54
544.58
590.71
632.92
487.41
426.87
428.30
294.79
703.78
545.13
400.47
0
^s
0
327.89
526.67
393.81
341.79
528.40
438.10
369.17
515.29
463.40
455.82
688.25
472.30
426.19
381.53
420.67
457.67
428.46
520.33
376.29
505.47
600.24
605.14
459.26
397.18
388.45
265.97
674.27
500.75
395.88
IS
0
S
8.31
0.82
7.61
7.28
2.02
2.36
15.67
2.95
17.56
5.42
6.71
2.44
5.80
4.92
3.77
1.89
4.55
6.81
14.78
7.18
-1.61
4.39
5.78
6.96
9.30
9.78
4.19
8.14
1.15
"Sfc
>ri
r*
s
a.
1.80
5.78
146.04
5.05
6.37
6.27
37.11
6.49
7.63
111.61
5.35
7.84
6.65
15.53
157.13
4.07
19.07
22.22
10.04
12.77
12.39
2.45
27.15
10.56
4.91
83.99
8.98
4.11
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-68
-------
RunID
84676
84677
84679
84680
84681
84682
84683
84685
84686
84687
84688
84689
84690
84692
84693
84694
84695
84696
84699
84700
84701
84702
84703
84705
84707
84708
84709
84710
84712
fe
a.
1
54.8
57.9
60.5
62.1
41.3
43.1
45.5
46.9
49.3
49.9
52.1
54.2
55.2
55.8
54.7
52.1
42.4
42.2
42.6
40.8
40.2
41.2
43.7
48.1
48.6
46.0
47.0
48.2
48.8
i
25.6
24.1
25.4
24.2
68.7
33.1
39.4
22.6
14.1
3.2
38.9
38.2
38.3
35.3
43.3
51.9
67.6
67.7
71.1
72.9
66.9
64.8
60.9
54.2
52.8
60.0
60.4
59.3
61.3
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
0.99
0.28
1.42
53.89
0.29
2.30
1.18
1.69
6.62
2.33
0.42
0.26
0.70
7.05
1.06
2.91
0.71
6.17
8.22
8.22
0.51
1.38
1.23
2.37
4.63
0.10
1.49
2.33
12.63
0
>>
Q
0.89
0.27
1.20
16.94
0.31
2.39
1.04
1.21
3.27
1.90
0.41
0.26
0.68
7.62
1.00
1.91
0.63
3.73
5.18
6.11
0.49
1.27
1.09
2.25
2.75
0.10
1.12
1.29
6.36
te
S
S
10.20
2.88
15.12
68.56
-4.74
-3.95
11.69
28.30
50.61
18.58
2.27
-3.14
2.68
-8.09
4.95
34.14
10.57
39.51
36.98
25.70
3.56
8.35
11.50
4.91
40.63
0.32
24.75
44.55
49.65
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
19.21
4.52
18.60
148.84
4.02
46.58
15.28
7.12
26.05
51.55
6.86
7.26
9.95
161.33
16.73
27.93
9.06
31.60
76.51
78.09
3.85
15.46
29.87
72.01
45.21
1.28
21.79
22.28
80.06
0
>>
Q
17.58
4.14
14.41
111.35
4.09
46.27
12.86
5.50
18.29
43.90
6.47
6.72
9.29
158.99
15.58
20.69
7.38
25.23
61.85
65.54
3.39
12.60
26.32
75.48
38.52
1.11
18.00
21.31
75.65
la
Q
S
8.51
8.52
22.55
25.19
-1.77
0.65
15.80
22.73
29.80
14.85
5.77
7.44
6.64
1.45
6.88
25.93
18.61
20.15
19.16
16.07
11.91
18.51
11.91
-4.81
14.81
13.36
17.39
4.33
5.51
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
2.16
0.64
1.31
1.82
1.88
0.90
2.74
1.83
4.61
1.65
1.30
0.67
1.05
0.22
1.83
5.11
1.00
3.35
2.03
3.31
2.07
1.61
5.69
0.76
1.95
0.55
1.32
0.62
1.79
0
>i
Q
2.29
0.60
1.36
2.34
2.15
0.90
2.87
1.90
3.90
1.58
1.28
0.67
1.26
0.26
1.91
4.43
1.20
3.60
2.48
3.38
2.21
1.69
5.33
0.78
2.10
0.51
1.33
0.66
2.09
la
Q
S
-5.93
5.61
-3.76
-28.55
-14.10
0.01
-4.53
-4.11
15.33
4.14
1.77
0.20
-20.81
-21.20
-4.70
13.28
-20.87
-7.49
-21.68
-1.90
-6.72
-4.46
6.36
-3.02
-7.36
5.63
-0.37
-5.45
-17.25
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
540.03
478.77
390.69
606.50
406.11
430.75
423.70
641.39
537.08
681.37
490.93
327.55
372.43
290.43
557.86
596.16
385.47
473.70
560.64
669.95
399.99
653.84
528.25
496.27
713.34
485.14
430.60
414.17
413.05
0
^s
0
513.65
448.88
341.77
527.49
401.57
436.33
404.59
603.75
439.63
622.69
459.18
308.20
378.31
284.65
543.17
492.64
390.72
391.13
514.41
613.09
394.25
587.59
505.96
486.48
669.72
460.99
365.17
412.37
396.93
IS
0
S
4.88
6.24
12.52
13.03
1.12
-1.29
4.51
5.87
18.15
8.61
6.47
5.91
-1.58
1.99
2.63
17.36
-1.36
17.43
8.25
8.49
1.44
10.13
4.22
1.97
6.11
4.98
15.20
0.43
3.90
"Sfc
>ri
fi
s
a.
8.78
2.03
7.87
417.10
20.09
9.18
66.01
27.30
32.52
10.36
2.43
2.00
19.12
5.66
26.68
2.12
51.72
158.21
68.99
11.59
8.53
11.19
27.23
78.06
11.19
3.37
39.89
30.98
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-69
-------
RunID
84713
84714
84715
84719
84720
84722
84723
84724
84726
84727
84728
84729
84730
84732
84733
84734
84737
84738
84739
84740
84743
84745
84747
84748
84749
84751
84752
84753
84754
fe
a.
1
44.1
43.2
43.2
42.7
43.6
50.5
54.7
58.8
64.4
66.5
62.5
64.6
66.6
70.6
63.4
63.0
59.5
58.2
50.1
51.6
52.4
50.2
63.6
66.1
68.0
72.3
74.1
66.0
67.0
i
74.1
71.4
72.6
62.0
59.9
47.4
43.2
35.3
29.1
26.5
43.4
41.5
39.6
37.1
42.7
42.9
49.5
50.7
52.1
48.7
42.3
38.5
36.9
36.9
37.3
35.9
33.5
59.6
58.3
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
0.41
0.35
2.46
0.43
2.05
0.21
2.40
0.76
0.73
0.80
0.16
0.18
1.40
4.86
0.28
0.65
0.25
5.53
0.51
0.68
0.72
0.08
0.10
0.15
0.16
0.41
0.14
0.08
0
>>
Q
0.36
0.34
2.08
0.32
1.81
0.18
1.95
0.52
0.59
0.77
0.14
0.18
1.04
3.75
0.25
0.58
0.26
4.62
0.53
0.57
0.20
0.66
0.03
0.10
0.13
0.16
0.45
0.13
0.08
te
S
S
12.60
2.79
15.41
25.36
11.68
14.42
19.09
30.67
18.40
3.16
9.01
2.58
25.55
22.91
10.90
9.42
-2.33
16.54
-3.58
15.80
N/A
8.26
60.96
3.55
12.28
4.56
-10.32
6.17
-0.09
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
7.34
4.99
39.40
8.49
19.36
2.50
18.95
8.91
18.88
13.76
0.95
3.09
13.25
84.37
2.39
8.48
10.72
159.32
7.99
9.94
15.11
1.27
2.49
2.43
6.72
2.80
1.36
0.78
0
>>
Q
6.16
5.23
37.92
6.92
17.63
2.15
14.48
6.40
15.75
13.98
0.67
2.86
9.79
69.27
2.20
7.86
10.58
145.23
7.71
8.11
5.39
12.51
-0.93
1.85
1.64
5.96
2.57
1.04
0.51
la
Q
S
16.09
-4.93
3.75
18.45
8.96
14.04
23.57
28.20
16.58
-1.54
29.19
7.50
26.06
17.90
7.81
7.28
1.38
8.84
3.56
18.39
N/A
17.23
173.07
25.75
32.55
11.34
8.29
23.14
35.11
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
0.57
0.22
1.61
1.09
2.95
1.69
3.33
1.48
1.49
1.11
0.09
0.29
0.59
4.02
0.67
1.58
0.93
1.81
0.68
0.85
2.00
0.49
0.73
0.25
1.14
1.56
0.22
0.36
0
>i
Q
0.60
0.27
1.76
1.12
2.97
1.45
3.71
1.51
1.42
1.14
0.14
0.29
0.58
4.59
0.64
1.61
0.89
2.17
0.78
0.86
1.09
1.97
0.48
0.75
0.25
1.31
1.52
0.20
0.34
la
Q
S
-6.30
-22.71
-9.56
-3.08
-0.59
13.97
-11.45
-1.76
4.68
-2.90
-63.59
1.90
1.38
-14.20
4.59
-1.71
3.68
-20.15
-15.28
-1.32
N/A
1.37
0.49
-2.59
1.00
-14.18
2.21
9.77
5.38
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
512.17
318.77
390.35
489.94
685.23
530.69
400.78
477.91
541.37
528.49
466.10
319.05
535.18
480.18
481.69
497.26
419.50
652.37
305.08
532.50
298.20
519.53
535.67
470.47
308.51
253.43
520.58
516.47
0
^s
0
508.62
302.51
361.07
434.34
614.65
498.32
353.94
408.42
453.30
511.19
443.83
387.32
479.25
440.96
449.98
457.62
378.23
614.61
350.72
488.72
295.12
277.54
382.85
489.93
429.24
332.03
246.05
485.51
481.02
IS
0
S
0.69
5.10
7.50
11.35
10.30
6.10
11.69
14.54
16.27
3.27
4.78
-21.40
10.45
8.17
6.58
7.97
9.84
5.79
-14.96
8.22
N/A
6.93
26.31
8.54
8.76
-7.62
2.91
6.74
6.86
"Sfc
>ri
r*
s
a.
2.45
10.46
59.26
1.24
9.57
2.87
11.05
4.31
2.86
34.79
5.89
2.13
6.57
7.78
1.44
3.61
10.10
15.24
22.84
6.71
1.19
16.61
1.62
1.13
2.92
6.38
6.15
3.38
PEMS
DATASuspect
X
X
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
4-70
-------
RunID
84755
84757
84758
84759
84760
84761
84763
84765
84766
84767
84768
84770
84771
84772
84773
84774
84775
84777
fe
a.
1
69.1
68.2
68.9
60.2
61.8
62.9
65.4
66.2
56.8
56.5
56.2
56.9
56.4
56.7
50.0
55.6
60.0
63.8
Average*
i
54.7
50.0
49.1
73.3
68.6
62.5
56.1
53.9
64.8
64.2
63.7
63.4
64.5
64.1
72.9
60.3
40.1
29.3
HC (g/mi)
in
s
w
a.
0.10
0.18
3.59
0.05
0.09
0.08
0.13
6.11
0.16
0.51
0.81
0.60
3.57
0.56
0.22
0.43
1.38
0.91
0
>>
Q
0.10
0.19
3.19
0.05
0.09
0.09
0.12
4.27
0.14
0.36
0.70
0.56
3.05
0.49
0.18
0.38
1.19
0.88
te
a
S
4.16
-4.18
11.24
-2.94
-6.08
-10.00
5.78
30.12
10.28
30.72
13.82
7.16
14.65
12.72
16.27
11.70
13.66
2.66
15.70
CO (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
2.45
1.98
54.92
1.21
1.23
1.23
2.04
113.55
1.78
14.16
3.34
5.90
27.01
8.13
2.09
5.07
14.56
16.56
0
>>
Q
2.40
1.52
53.57
1.02
1.03
1.03
1.74
103.26
1.49
9.77
3.20
5.69
22.49
6.79
1.65
3.55
12.12
15.58
la
a
S
2.20
23.33
2.45
16.05
15.83
16.63
14.75
9.06
16.34
31.05
4.29
3.56
16.73
16.46
21.33
29.92
16.75
5.91
14.76
NOx (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
0.14
0.49
1.38
0.03
0.05
0.08
0.13
1.27
0.33
2.31
1.30
2.17
2.66
2.48
0.57
0.87
2.67
3.38
0
>i
Q
0.12
0.46
1.53
0.03
0.06
0.07
0.14
1.52
0.35
2.09
1.37
2.26
2.92
2.50
0.59
0.29
2.58
3.48
la
a
S
13.63
4.98
-11.05
6.95
-12.22
8.14
-8.14
-19.74
-4.91
9.52
-5.62
-4.31
-9.57
-0.69
-3.32
66.48
3.32
-2.86
10.21
CO2 (g/mi)
!/5
s
w
a.
509.45
531.78
665.06
351.05
477.75
518.77
512.35
511.56
513.45
549.19
602.31
632.53
500.77
467.98
530.19
506.34
687.87
473.78
0
^s
0
501.79
498.01
624.18
357.69
454.34
529.55
511.31
465.69
488.72
408.99
577.16
605.50
467.51
470.37
477.23
454.49
616.25
462.83
IS
0
S
1.51
6.35
6.15
-1.89
4.90
-2.08
0.20
8.97
4.82
25.53
4.18
4.27
6.64
-0.51
9.99
10.24
10.41
2.31
8.27
"Sfc
>ri
fi
s
a.
2.88
2.02
16.66
0.79
1.46
2.51
3.51
101.74
1.76
3.03
7.08
23.63
45.02
6.41
1.55
3.95
3.76
3.65
PEMS
DATASuspect
Dyno
DATASuspect
*The average percentage difference shown here is the average of the absolute value of the percentage difference for each run
4-71
-------
Figure 4-16 provides a by-pollutant comparison of dynamometer vs. PEMS emissions
with a 1:1 reference line. HC, CO, NOx, and CO2 are depicted using dots, squares, triangles,
and circle-crosses, respectively. Additional scatter plots of dynamometer results vs. the PEMS
for each particular phase can be located in Appendices G and H. Results listed as "suspect" in
Table 4-12 are not included in Figure 4-16.
Table 4-13 provides results of all conditioning run tests conducted during Round 2, and
Table 4-14 provides results of all driveaway tests conducted during Round 2. All conditioning
run and driveaway results were reviewed to identify missing information and indicators of
potentially invalid results, including an evaluation of exhaust mass flow rates, exhaust
temperatures, dilution levels, ambient temperature measurements, test duration and distance and
measured fuel economy. PEMS tests with highly suspicious results are indicated with an "x" in
the "PEMS data suspect" column in Tables 4-13 and 4-14, and detailed notes collected during
review of all PEMS tests are provided in Appendices T and U.
4-72
-------
Scatter Plot of Composte HC (g/mte)
5 10 15
SEMIECH HC (a/Wte)
/prcfl/KanBaaC^//^alyaWFlound1/SumBKI_SEMja8 25JUL06 1519
Scatter Plot of Composite CO fa/rnlle)
20
350
25
0 50100150200250300350400
SEMTECH CO fe/mle)
/prcfl/KanBaaC^//^alyaWFtound1/SumBKI_SEMjaB 25JUL06 1519
Figure 4-16. Plots of Round 2 Dynamometer vs. PEMS Measurements
4-73
-------
Scatter Plot of Composte NQx Ig/mte)
I 4
1600
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0:
234667
SEMTECH NOx (g/rnfe)
/picip/KanBaiClly/ArdyiWRouidl/SunBKI.SEMjas 25JUL06 1519
Scatter Plot of Composte CQ2 (g/rrtte)
0 100200300400600600700800900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
SEMTECH CQ2 (gAnfe)
A^/KanBaiClly/AralyiWRoiiid1/SunBKI_SEMjas 25JUL06 1519
Figure 4-16 (Continued). Plots of Round 2 Dynamometer vs. PEMS
Measurements
4-74
-------
Table 4-13. Round 2 Conditioning Run Test Results
CTR TST ID
C KS2 453 1
C KS2 462 1
C KS2 484 1
C KS2 491 1
C KS2 495 1
C KS2 511 1
C KS2 518 1
C KS2 521 1
C KS2 530 1
C KS2 531 1
C KS2 532 1
C KS2 533 1
C KS2 534 1
C KS2 537 1
C KS2 538 1
C KS2 539 1
C KS2 540 1
C KS2 541 1
C KS2 542 1
C KS2 543 1
C KS2 544 1
C KS2 545 1
C KS2 546 1
C KS2 547 1
C KS2 548 1
Make
HONDA
KIA
CHRYSLER
HONDA
JEEP
TOYOTA
DODGE
MITSUBISHI
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
HONDA
HONDA
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
HONDA
TOYOTA
DODGE
PONTIAC
DODGE
MERCURY
FORD
CHEVROLET
HONDA
SATURN
Model
ODYSSEY
SEDONA
TOWN & COUNTRY
ODYSSEY
CHEROKEE 4X4
SIENNA LE
GRAND CARAVAN
MONTERO
ESCORT LX
SILVERADO
300M
ODYSSEY
ACCORD
VOYAGER
ACCORD
CIVIC
COROLLA
CARAVAN
GRAND AM
CARAVAN
SABLE
F250
MALIBU
CIVIC
NULL
i
>t
•5
1
2002
2004
2002
2003
2001
2001
2002
2003
1995
1976
1999
2000
1997
1998
2001
1991
1995
1997
1989
2000
2002
1979
1999
1996
1996
Disp
3.5
3.5
3.8
3.5
4
3
3.3
3.8
1.9
3.5
3.5
3.5
2.2
3.3
2.3
1.5
1.6
3.3
2.3
3
3
5.7
3.1
1.6
1.9
Test Date
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
2/22/2005
4/5/2005
4/4/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
2/7/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
20
22
22
29
24
26
42
63
25
31
29
36
27
24
37
30
51
27
32
26
34
31
49
31
46
Test Distance (miles)
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.3
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
FuelUsed (gal)
0.51
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.60
0.38
0.39
0.97
0.39
1.34
0.42
0.47
0.37
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.40
0.43
0.47
0.81
0.45
1.32
0.40
0.31
0.35
'ox
e.
^S,
a
•—
*&
QJ
15.6
18.9
19.0
19.5
13.3
21.0
20.3
8.6
20.4
6.0
18.9
17.3
21.8
18.3
19.3
19.1
20.3
18.9
17.0
9.8
17.7
6.1
20.0
26.1
22.8
Composite CO2 (gpm)
567.0
472.3
469.4
456.7
667.0
425.3
439.6
1038.1
425.6
1201.3
475.2
515.1
408.9
487.4
465.2
442.6
439.1
475.6
492.2
912.2
507.5
1268.6
439.7
331.7
390.5
Composite CO (gpm)
4.22
0.55
2.53
0.87
5.05
2.99
2.14
6.02
9.31
168.71
1.01
3.17
2.22
2.17
0.87
16.13
2.74
1.24
17.93
2.49
0.75
124.93
6.75
7.70
2.84
Composite NOx (gpm)
0.21
0.01
0.51
0.18
0.85
0.19
0.83
1.51
1.13
7.46
0.21
0.33
0.46
0.85
0.10
3.04
0.98
0.75
4.34
0.49
0.12
2.27
0.85
0.70
0.90
Composite THC (gpm)
0.05
0.02
0.07
0.03
0.23
0.07
0.10
0.21
0.35
12.88
0.12
0.30
0.14
0.22
0.10
1.29
0.41
0.14
3.37
0.57
0.06
9.81
0.68
0.50
0.32
a
1
Cj
8,
1/3
1
X
X
4-75
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 549 1
C KS2 550 1
C KS2 551 1
C KS2 552 1
C KS2 553 1
C KS2 555 1
C KS2 556 1
C KS2 557 1
C KS2 558 1
C KS2 559 1
C KS2 562 1
C KS2 563 1
C KS2 564 1
C KS2 565 1
C KS2 566 1
C KS2 567 1
C KS2 567 2
C KS2 567 3
C KS2 568 1
C KS2 569 1
C KS2 570 1
C KS2 571 1
C KS2 572 1
C KS2 574 1
C KS2 575 1
C KS2 576 1
C KS2 577 1
Make
CHEVROLET
PONTIAC
CHEVROLET
DODGE
HONDA
JEEP
HONDA
FORD
SATURN
JEEP
CHEVROLET
DODGE
SATURN
MITSUBISHI
MERCURY
JEEP
JEEP
JEEP
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
SATURN
BUICK
CHEVROLET
BUICK
FORD
GEO
PONTIAC
Model
LUMINA
GRAND AM
IMPALA
DURANGO
CIVIC
GRAND CHEROKEE
ACCORD
EXPLORER
LSI
CHEROKEE
MALIBU
SPIRIT
SC2
GALANT
GRAND MARQUIS
STATIC
WRANGLER
WRANGLER
WRANGLER
CAMRY
S-10
SEDAN
PARK AVENUE
SILVERADO
CENTURY
F150
PRIZM
BONNE VILLE
1
>f
"3
1
1998
1997
2003
1999
1998
1995
2000
1995
2000
1998
1998
1990
2001
2001
1991
1997
1997
1997
1994
1995
1999
1995
2002
2001
2001
1991
1995
Disp
3.1
2.4
3.8
5.9
1.6
4
2.3
4
2.2
4
3.1
2.5
1.9
2.4
5
4
4
4
3
4.3
1.9
3.8
5.3
3.1
4.6
1.6
3.8
Test Date
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/20/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
39
35
58
46
36
35
32
48
37
35
45
36
33
51
160
57
53
35
51
26
56
40
24
25
31
74
39
Test Distance (miles)
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.6
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.2
8.1
8.5
8.0
8.2
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
10.7
FuelUsed (gal)
0.36
0.38
0.39
1.20
0.25
0.95
0.35
0.89
0.33
0.85
0.36
0.45
0.30
0.36
0.82
0.85
0.80
0.70
0.34
0.78
0.29
0.71
0.73
0.40
0.81
0.35
1.05
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
22.5
20.8
20.4
6.7
32.5
8.5
22.8
9.0
24.6
9.5
22.5
17.8
28.3
22.3
9.9
9.4
10.2
11.5
25.3
10.2
28.5
11.4
11.0
20.1
9.9
23.1
10.2
Composite CO2 (gpm)
394.7
428.3
434.3
1304.4
267.8
1006.1
392.1
986.5
361.9
883.4
395.6
487.4
315.9
402.0
882.3
930.2
869.1
769.9
352.7
870.5
307.6
771.9
808.5
445.8
905.6
373.1
862.7
Composite CO (gpm)
2.76
2.82
4.28
26.02
5.71
28.26
2.44
9.56
2.33
36.42
3.11
11.76
1.38
0.59
13.34
15.62
7.20
6.66
1.18
6.56
4.25
8.57
6.49
1.16
3.13
8.26
9.01
Composite NOx (gpm)
0.51
0.88
0.09
1.13
0.11
7.25
0.31
3.14
0.40
7.77
0.89
1.66
0.12
0.18
2.31
0.87
0.68
0.60
0.36
1.50
0.34
0.93
0.47
0.10
0.52
2.14
2.04
Composite THC (gpm)
0.40
0.23
0.17
1.27
0.28
4.09
0.20
0.58
0.22
4.38
0.37
0.66
0.08
0.09
2.90
1.21
0.77
0.63
0.23
0.59
0.44
0.81
0.64
0.06
0.30
0.92
0.81
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
4-76
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 579 1
C KS2 580 1
C KS2 581 1
C KS2 582 1
C KS2 583 1
C KS2 583 2
C KS2 584 1
C KS2 585 1
C KS2 586 1
C KS2 593 1
C KS2 594 1
C KS2 595 1
C KS2 596 1
C KS2 597 1
C KS2 599 1
C KS2 599 2
C KS2 600 1
C KS2 602 1
C KS2 605 1
C KS2 606 1
C KS2 607 1
C KS2 608 1
C KS2 609 1
C KS2 611 1
C KS2 612 1
C KS2 614 1
C KS2 616 1
Make
TOYOTA
PLYMOUTH
SATURN
CHEVROLET
BUICK
BUICK
NISSAN
FORD
PONTIAC
FORD
PLYMOUTH
FORD
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
DODGE
DODGE
CHEVROLET
FORD
M.BENZ
CHEVROLET
FORD
DODGE
HONDA
JEEP
Model
SIENNA
VOYAGER
SEDAN
TRACKER
REGAL
REGAL
MAXIMA
TAURUS
GRAND PRIX LE
AEROSTAR
VOYAGER
RANGER
CROWN VICTORIA
AEROSTAR
LUMINA LS
LUMINA LS
CONTOUR
INTREPID
CARAVAN
SILVERADO 1500
TEMPO
280 SE
MONTE CARLO
EXPLORER
RAM
CIVIC
CHEROKEE
1
>f
"3
1
2000
1999
2001
2003
1994
1994
1995
1995
1993
1993
1989
1988
1995
1992
1994
1994
1995
1994
1989
1996
1986
1973
1977
1996
1989
1988
1998
Disp
3
3.8
2.2
2.5
3.1
3.1
3
3
3.1
3
3
2.3
4.6
3
3.8
3.8
2
3.3
3
5
2.3
4.5
5
4
2
1.5
4
Test Date
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/26/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/27/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/28/2005
1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/29/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
37
34
33
73
43
46
36
48
77
84
41
59
44
32
40
43
34
32
25
55
44
52
39
65
45
29
34
Test Distance (miles)
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.1
18.6
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
18.6
FuelUsed (gal)
0.83
0.74
0.42
0.39
0.73
0.76
0.36
0.41
1.02
0.44
0.78
0.48
0.88
0.46
0.73
0.43
0.33
0.69
0.37
1.60
0.50
1.13
0.67
0.90
0.39
0.39
1.60
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
9.7
11.0
19.0
20.8
11.0
10.6
22.0
19.7
8.1
18.6
10.4
16.7
9.1
17.6
11.0
18.8
24.3
11.6
21.7
11.6
16.2
7.2
11.9
8.9
21.0
20.6
11.6
Composite CO2 (gpm)
918.9
795.4
470.5
428.8
798.9
835.9
401.0
451.0
918.5
469.2
745.7
500.8
958.0
497.5
813.3
472.6
357.9
761.0
398.9
765.2
382.3
560.3
629.1
993.1
404.1
382.9
763.8
Composite CO (gpm)
3.36
12.02
2.12
1.36
9.23
7.52
3.58
4.28
116.66
7.32
79.40
17.32
16.52
8.32
1.87
3.27
6.96
9.32
7.81
5.44
112.27
313.91
71.09
7.28
14.14
29.94
7.17
Composite NOx (gpm)
1.20
0.89
0.32
0.21
2.09
1.34
0.82
0.91
1.57
1.32
2.49
1.45
2.13
2.07
0.84
0.43
0.59
1.66
2.16
1.08
1.98
1.75
2.73
1.51
2.66
1.76
1.22
Composite THC (gpm)
0.48
0.53
0.12
0.13
1.50
0.88
0.58
0.24
6.43
0.59
3.67
2.77
1.39
0.70
0.65
0.44
0.29
1.16
1.16
0.26
7.43
96.52
8.01
0.67
1.53
2.95
0.30
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
4-77
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 617 1
C KS2 618 1
C KS2 619 1
C KS2 622 1
C KS2 623 1
C KS2 623 2
C KS2 624 1
C KS2 624 2
C KS2 625 1
C KS2 626 1
C KS2 627 1
C KS2 627 2
C KS2 627 3
C KS2 628 1
C KS2 631 1
C KS2 632 1
C KS2 633 1
C KS2 634 1
C KS2 635 1
C KS2 638 1
C KS2 639 1
C KS2 640 1
C KS2 641 1
C KS2 642 1
C KS2 643 1
C KS2 644 1
C KS2 644 2
Make
DODGE
BUICK
DODGE
MAZDA
CADILLAC
CADILLAC
FORD
FORD
BUICK
TOYOTA
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
CHEVROLET
FORD
GMC
FORD
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
TOYOTA
ACURA
NISSAN
CHRYSLER
FORD
CHRYSLER
DODGE
DODGE
Model
NEON
LASABRE
CARAVAN
B2200
FLEETWOOD
FLEETWOOD
RANGER
RANGER
RAINER
TRUCK
LESABRE
LESABRE
LESABRE
CIO SILVERADO
RANGER XLT
SONOMA
FREESTAR SEL
4RUNNER SR5
SUBURBAN
SIENNA XLE
INTEGRA
FRONTIER
CONCORD
TAURUS
CONCORD LXI
INTREPID
INTREPID
1
>f
"3
1
1996
1979
1996
1992
1991
1991
1990
1990
2004
1987
1995
1995
1995
1984
1997
1996
2004
1995
1995
2001
1995
1998
1996
2002
2000
1993
1993
Disp
2
4.9
3.3
2.1
4.9
4.9
2.3
2.3
4.2
2.4
3.8
3.8
3.8
5
2.3
2.2
4.2
3
5.7
3
1.8
2.4
3.5
3
3.2
3.3
3.3
Test Date
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/31/2005
2/1/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/1/2005
2/1/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
55
36
29
26
31
26
26
26
51
46
53
37
24
27
32
25
25
88
45
53
79
27
25
27
37
33
35
Test Distance (miles)
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
FuelUsed (gal)
0.37
1.06
0.82
0.44
1.00
0.57
0.50
0.49
1.02
0.44
0.40
0.46
0.76
0.95
0.41
0.43
0.49
0.92
1.18
0.68
0.31
0.45
0.42
0.40
0.76
0.36
0.37
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
21.9
7.6
9.8
18.6
8.0
14.1
16.4
16.3
8.0
18.1
19.8
17.5
10.5
8.3
19.5
18.6
16.4
8.7
15.7
11.8
26.2
18.0
19.1
20.2
10.5
22.2
21.9
Composite CO2 (gpm)
402.8
1156.9
910.7
434.1
1077.0
609.9
489.2
465.5
1127.0
493.3
451.1
507.4
852.1
1021.0
451.4
474.6
550.8
993.0
554.3
759.2
331.8
489.2
467.4
444.0
845.5
395.0
401.0
Composite CO (gpm)
4.97
7.52
5.20
31.64
26.95
16.37
35.45
48.16
2.37
1.62
2.18
4.23
3.78
32.63
6.99
6.19
0.32
24.62
9.75
3.90
6.76
6.11
2.41
0.76
7.39
5.16
6.03
Composite NOx (gpm)
0.71
14.17
1.36
3.00
1.38
0.66
4.30
3.98
0.09
2.90
0.81
0.54
0.88
2.60
1.52
0.72
0.02
0.86
1.56
0.60
0.34
1.88
0.63
0.29
0.54
1.97
2.00
Composite THC (gpm)
0.35
8.16
0.83
0.65
1.20
1.31
1.52
3.82
0.38
1.32
0.10
0.14
0.27
4.03
0.25
0.30
0.04
1.61
1.06
0.14
0.52
0.71
0.13
0.03
0.55
0.76
0.12
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-78
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 645 1
C KS2 646 1
C KS2 647 1
C KS2 648 1
C KS2 649 1
C KS2 651 1
C KS2 653 1
C KS2 654 1
C KS2 655 1
C KS2 656 1
C KS2 660 1
C KS2 661 1
C KS2 662 1
C KS2 663 1
C KS2 664 1
C KS2 665 1
C KS2 667 1
C KS2 668 1
C KS2 670 1
C KS2 671 1
C KS2 674 1
C KS2 675 1
C KS2 676 1
C KS2 677 1
C KS2 677 2
C KS2 679 1
C KS2 680 1
Make
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
HONDA
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
BUICK
CHEVROLET
DODGE
DODGE
LINCOLN
ISUZU
FORD
HONDA
DODGE
CHEVROLET
DODGE
GEO
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
CHEVROLET
SUBARU
PONTIAC
PONTIAC
FORD
CHEVROLET
Model
F150
ASTROVAN
SUBURBAN
F150
CIVIC
CAPRICE
CONCORDE
SKYLARK
ASTRO VAN
CARAVAN
GRAND CARAVAN
TOWNCAR
PICKUP
TAURUS
ACCORD
GRAND CARAVAN
C1500
RAMPU
TRACKER
SUNDANCE
CRV
SUBURBAN
LEGACY WAGON
MONTANA
MONTANA
RANGER
TAHOE
1
>f
"3
1
1989
1992
1994
2001
1992
1982
2002
1994
1993
1992
1998
1991
1995
2001
1997
2003
1996
1995
1992
1992
1998
1999
1993
2003
2003
1998
1996
Disp
5
4.3
5.7
5.4
1.5
4.4
3.5
3.1
4.3
3
3.3
4.6
2.3
3
2.2
3
4.3
5.9
1.6
2.5
2
5.7
2.2
3.4
3.4
4
5.7
Test Date
2/4/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/6/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/8/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/10/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
4/2/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
36
39
27
44
30
28
41
33
51
40
123
30
35
37
26
22
30
31
30
37
42
28
49
24
29
29
78
Test Distance (miles)
18.6
8.0
8.0
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.8
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.0
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.3
FuelUsed (gal)
1.26
0.90
0.65
1.12
0.88
0.97
0.50
0.36
0.74
0.82
0.02
0.48
0.45
0.45
0.38
0.44
0.50
0.79
0.38
0.38
1.08
0.74
0.42
0.38
0.39
0.42
0.67
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
14.8
8.9
12.3
16.6
9.1
8.3
16.0
22.5
11.0
9.7
507.0
16.6
17.7
19.4
21.0
18.4
16.0
10.1
21.2
21.0
17.2
10.8
18.9
20.9
20.8
19.2
12.3
Composite CO2 (gpm)
594.6
968.3
679.2
540.1
947.2
483.8
555.6
354.4
749.9
888.3
4.1
511.4
493.5
462.0
423.2
489.4
561.3
862.2
387.8
409.7
513.6
819.3
463.6
427.4
431.5
465.2
710.5
Composite CO (gpm)
8.04
21.28
27.32
1.41
22.91
272.91
4.24
29.35
37.70
19.72
0.11
18.57
8.22
1.01
3.18
0.47
1.73
17.01
22.02
12.20
4.15
8.30
7.19
2.02
0.61
2.17
12.01
Composite NOx (gpm)
1.24
7.52
5.41
0.09
1.87
0.61
0.26
0.32
2.05
5.04
0.00
1.06
1.62
0.14
0.39
0.43
0.29
1.08
1.67
1.41
0.25
1.32
1.00
0.19
0.14
0.72
1.07
Composite THC (gpm)
0.41
4.44
2.93
0.14
1.33
80.71
0.66
0.58
3.53
2.71
0.00
1.55
1.00
0.07
0.09
0.03
0.15
0.60
0.99
0.39
0.09
0.52
0.64
0.07
0.03
0.16
1.21
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-79
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 681 1
C KS2 681 2
C KS2 681 3
C KS2 682 1
C KS2 682 2
C KS2 685 1
C KS2 686 1
C KS2 689 1
C KS2 689 2
C KS2 693 1
C KS2 694 1
C KS2 695 1
C KS2 698 1
C KS2 700 1
C KS2 701 1
C KS2 702 1
C KS2 703 1
C KS2 704 1
C KS2 705 1
C KS2 706 1
C KS2 707 1
C KS2 709 1
C KS2 709 2
C KS2 711 1
C KS2 712 1
C KS2 713 1
C KS2 715 1
Make
DODGE
DODGE
DODGE
JEEP
JEEP
DODGE
TOYOTA
LINCOLN
LINCOLN
ISUZU
OLDS
FORD
CHRYSLER
BUICK
DODGE
CHEVROLET
FORD
CADILLAC
DODGE
HONDA
DODGE
FORD
FORD
MERCURY
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
Model
GRAND CARAVAN
GRAND CARAVAN
GRAND CARAVAN
CHEROKEE SPORT
CHEROKEE SPORT
DAKOTA
COROLLA
TOWN CAR
TOWN CAR
AXIOM
SILHOUTTE
F150
TOWN & COUNTRY LX
PARK AVENUE
DAKOTA
S-10
COUNTRY SQUIRE
SEDAN DEVILLE
DAKOTA
ODYSSEY
GRAND CARAVAN
RANGER
RANGER
TOPAZ
RANGER
TAURUS
SILVERADO
1
>f
"3
1
1996
1996
1996
2000
2000
1999
1995
1988
1988
2002
2002
1992
2001
2000
1998
2001
1986
1992
2004
1995
1998
2002
2002
1994
1996
1995
1994
Disp
3.3
3.3
3.3
4
4
3.9
1.8
5
5
3.5
3.4
4.9
3.3
3.8
3.9
4.3
5
4.9
3.7
2.2
3.3
4
4
2.3
2.3
2.2
5.7
Test Date
2/12/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/12/2005
2/11/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
34
25
35
22
28
22
19
33
0
38
56
31
28
31
35
45
38
62
37
33
43
30
28
37
38
47
29
Test Distance (miles)
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
11.5
8.0
8.0
8.1
FuelUsed (gal)
0.47
0.37
0.00
0.53
0.52
0.46
0.28
0.48
0.00
0.50
0.41
0.60
0.44
0.39
0.51
0.52
0.50
0.78
0.47
0.84
0.44
0.00
0.53
0.46
0.41
1.04
0.62
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
17.2
21.5
53605.6
15.0
15.3
17.4
28.9
16.6
N/A
16.2
19.6
13.4
18.2
20.7
16.0
15.4
16.0
10.3
16.9
9.5
18.8
N/A
15.2
25.1
19.3
7.7
12.9
Composite CO2 (gpm)
493.8
401.8
0.0
580.9
578.7
503.2
306.0
512.2
550.4
455.5
664.7
487.4
429.0
548.9
581.1
504.2
451.6
523.8
925.5
472.4
0.0
591.7
356.0
453.8
1125.7
681.5
Composite CO (gpm)
16.61
10.31
0.00
10.82
6.12
6.81
2.95
14.16
2.42
1.07
3.79
4.21
4.46
8.35
1.89
28.96
266.45
4.38
9.61
4.60
0.00
2.21
1.49
7.04
13.71
6.90
Composite NOx (gpm)
1.24
0.95
0.00
1.15
0.71
0.99
0.45
1.64
0.27
0.37
1.08
0.91
0.17
0.63
0.24
2.16
0.14
0.06
0.81
0.63
0.00
0.18
0.77
1.26
1.30
1.00
Composite THC (gpm)
0.70
0.51
0.00
0.31
0.19
0.60
0.23
2.79
0.12
0.08
0.65
0.21
0.13
0.31
0.07
4.87
14.30
0.33
0.74
0.21
0.00
0.11
0.15
0.69
1.04
0.91
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-80
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 716 1
C KS2 716 2
C KS2 718 1
C KS2 719 1
C KS2 721 1
C KS2 721 2
C KS2 722 1
C KS2 722 2
C KS2 723 1
C KS2 723 2
C KS2 724 1
C KS2 725 1
C KS2 726 1
C KS2 727 1
C KS2 727 2
C KS2 728 1
C KS2 728 2
C KS2 729 1
C KS2 731 1
C KS2 733 1
C KS2 734 1
C KS2 736 1
C KS2 737 1
C KS2 738 1
C KS2 738 2
C KS2 739 1
C KS2 740 1
Make
FORD
FORD
BUICK
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
VOLVO
VOLVO
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
CHEVROLET
BMW
BMW
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
FORD
NISSAN
PLYMOUTH
MERCURY
BUICK
SATURN
SATURN
FORD
FORD
Model
TAURUS
TAURUS
PARK AVENUE
LUMINA
WINDSTAR
WINDSTAR
960
960
TEMPO
TEMPO
BLAZER
TOWN & COUNTRY
S-10LS
528E
528E
CORSICA
CORSICA
TOWN & COUNTRY
ESCORT
PICKUP XE
VOYAGER
VILLAGER
LESABRE
SL2
SL2
TAURUS
ESCAPE
1
>f
"3
1
1993
1993
1993
1994
1998
1998
1993
1993
1993
1993
1996
2002
1995
1988
1988
1995
1995
1996
1993
1995
1993
1997
1978
2001
2001
1993
2002
Disp
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.1
3.8
3.8
2.9
2.9
2.3
2.3
4.3
3.8
4.3
2.7
2.7
3.1
3.1
3.8
1.9
2.4
3
3
5.7
1.9
1.9
3
3
Test Date
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/17/2005
3/18/2005
3/24/2005
4/5/2005
3/28/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
3/10/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
3/29/2005
2/25/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
3/19/2005
3/21/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
49
14
35
39
36
35
25
25
31
25
24
22
26
8
24
30
43
34
25
28
33
33
27
27
47
25
27
Test Distance (miles)
8.0
3.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
8.0
3.5
8.0
7.8
8.1
4.7
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.9
FuelUsed (gal)
0.00
0.20
0.46
0.44
0.47
0.42
0.41
0.53
0.34
0.37
0.52
0.44
0.52
0.01
0.48
0.33
0.15
0.44
0.31
0.50
0.27
0.38
0.64
0.30
18.07
0.39
0.42
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
N/A
19.2
17.4
18.2
17.2
19.2
19.8
15.0
23.5
21.4
15.4
18.1
15.3
0.0
16.8
24.1
23.4
18.1
24.9
16.0
17.3
21.0
12.4
27.1
0.4
20.6
18.9
Composite CO2 (gpm)
0.0
442.6
507.7
466.3
509.7
459.5
451.6
590.7
377.6
412.5
572.3
491.6
570.2
458.9
370.0
369.4
466.8
353.0
539.8
498.3
415.1
621.9
331.6
20238.6
426.8
472.9
Composite CO (gpm)
0.00
15.66
6.13
16.04
7.59
5.61
2.08
6.44
2.87
4.64
6.08
2.33
9.94
41.53
1.82
8.02
17.02
5.32
12.83
10.91
8.41
60.96
0.76
9.92
5.28
1.59
Composite NOx (gpm)
0.00
1.21
0.95
1.63
1.73
1.50
0.38
0.32
1.93
2.19
0.55
0.61
0.59
1.55
0.43
0.85
1.39
1.99
0.43
2.24
0.80
1.43
0.19
2.66
1.22
0.18
Composite THC (gpm)
0.00
0.35
0.19
0.92
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.42
0.20
0.21
0.25
0.08
0.67
3.93
0.15
0.65
0.93
0.14
0.64
0.57
0.20
3.70
0.05
0.72
0.50
0.08
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
4-81
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 743 1
C KS2 743 2
C KS2 743 3
C KS2 743 4
C KS2 744 1
C KS2 747 1
C KS2 749 1
C KS2 750 1
C KS2 751 1
C KS2 753 1
C KS2 757 1
C KS2 760 1
C KS2 761 1
C KS2 761 2
C KS2 761 3
C KS2 764 1
C KS2 767 1
C KS2 770 1
C KS2 772 1
C KS2 774 1
C KS2 774 2
C KS2 775 1
C KS2 776 1
C KS2 777 1
C KS2 778 1
C KS2 779 1
C KS2 780 1
Make
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
HONDA
TOYOTA
PONTIAC
FORD
FORD
FORD
BUICK
MAZDA
DATSUN
DATSUN
DATSUN
BUICK
DATSUN
TOYOTA
BUICK
NISSAN
NISSAN
OLDSMOBILE
FORD
FORD
FORD
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
Model
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
ACCORD EX
4 RUNNER
SUNBIRD
ESCORT SE
TAURUS GL
WINDSTAR
REGAL
PROTEGE
210 WAGON
2 10 WAGON
210 WAGON
SKYLARK
280Z
CAMRY
REGAL
QUEST
QUEST
DELTA 88
F-150
RANGER XLT
F-250
DELTA 88
SUBURBAN
1
>f
"3
1
1979
1979
1979
1979
1998
1993
1994
1998
1997
1998
1979
1998
1979
1979
1979
1998
1977
1989
1978
1996
1996
1990
1987
2000
1989
1978
1997
Disp
5
5
5
5
2.3
3
2
2
3
3.8
3.8
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
3.1
2.8
2.5
3.8
3
3
3.8
4.9
4
7.5
5.7
5.7
Test Date
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
3/25/2005
2/28/2005
3/30/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/29/2005
3/2/2005
3/3/2005
3/3/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/5/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
77
5
15
30
48
23
28
31
32
36
33
26
15
21
26
34
26
27
30
30
32
22
36
37
58
39
30
Test Distance (miles)
5.8
0.0
4.8
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
FuelUsed (gal)
0.16
0.00
0.35
0.50
0.29
0.47
0.78
0.28
0.64
0.46
0.58
0.29
0.01
0.26
0.24
0.39
0.63
0.24
0.42
0.39
0.41
0.53
0.57
0.47
0.69
0.51
0.66
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
37.2
2.2
13.4
16.1
27.4
17.2
10.3
28.3
12.5
17.6
13.7
28.2
2.9
30.2
33.1
20.4
12.7
33.7
19.2
20.5
19.5
15.0
14.1
N/A
11.6
15.8
12.1
Composite CO2 (gpm)
209.8
2578.9
577.7
516.2
323.9
498.0
826.3
312.7
710.0
504.5
531.7
312.3
2672.3
281.4
259.4
433.6
697.2
257.8
393.6
435.6
448.4
564.8
510.2
753.1
504.7
731.1
Composite CO (gpm)
17.30
590.65
50.45
25.29
2.67
16.46
25.46
3.14
6.71
4.00
74.72
3.86
228.98
8.86
6.11
3.74
5.67
5.51
42.86
1.59
6.79
16.33
80.96
14.88
34.27
8.02
Composite NOx (gpm)
1.75
0.33
3.30
4.44
0.30
1.12
0.43
0.87
0.65
1.96
3.08
0.56
3.25
2.48
2.20
0.39
1.18
0.93
2.91
0.42
0.64
1.26
3.06
2.87
1.51
1.24
Composite THC (gpm)
1.39
130.07
5.49
1.79
0.11
0.36
1.87
0.06
0.77
0.32
4.96
0.18
18.59
1.23
1.35
0.41
0.59
0.19
3.18
0.13
0.67
3.06
1.49
1.07
4.31
0.66
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-82
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 782 1
C KS2 782 2
C KS2 783 1
C KS2 784 1
C KS2 785 1
C KS2 787 1
C KS2 788 1
C KS2 788 2
C KS2 788 3
C KS2 789 1
C KS2 791 1
C KS2 792 1
C KS2 795 1
C KS2 796 1
C KS2 797 1
C KS2 800 1
C KS2 801 1
C KS2 802 1
C KS2 805 1
C KS2 805 2
C KS2 806 1
C KS2 807 1
C KS2 808 1
C KS2 809 1
C KS2 809 2
C KS2 811 1
C KS2 813 1
Make
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
FORD
FORD
VW
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
DODGE
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
FORD
HONDA
ACURA
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
VOLVO
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
FORD
NISSAN
NISSAN
DODGE
HONDA
Model
VOYAGER
VOYAGER
VOYAGER
RANGER XLT
RANGER
BEETLE
ACCLAIM
ACCLAIM
ACCLAIM
RAM PICKUP
CAMRY
TRAIL BLAZER
CROWN VICTORIA LTD
ACCORD SEI
2.5 TL
CUTLASS
VOYAGER SE
740 TURBO
CAVALIER
CAVALIER
SPIRIT
ESCORT
EXPLORER
PATHFINDER
PATHFINDER
SE DAKOTA
ACCORD LXI
1
>f
"3
1
1999
1999
1992
1992
1992
1973
1989
1989
1989
1987
1999
2002
1989
1989
1996
1990
1988
1987
1995
1995
1989
1987
1994
2001
2001
1987
1988
Disp
3.3
3.3
2.5
2.3
3
1.3
2.5
2.5
2.5
3.7
2.2
4.2
5
2
2.5
3.3
3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.5
1.9
4
3.5
3.5
3.9
2
Test Date
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/14/2005
3/9/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/11/2005
3/12/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
32
36
42
31
50
21
24
22
30
38
26
45
37
25
33
32
25
24
0
23
51
27
22
29
32
31
33
Test Distance (miles)
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.3
8.1
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
8.1
6.6
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
FuelUsed (gal)
0.40
0.44
0.45
0.49
0.63
0.36
0.20
0.19
0.00
0.52
0.36
0.50
0.49
0.35
0.40
0.40
0.43
0.86
0.00
0.29
0.65
0.78
0.55
0.50
0.81
0.56
0.43
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
20.1
18.4
18.0
16.4
13.0
22.4
40.5
41.7
N/A
15.5
22.7
15.9
16.4
23.0
20.4
20.3
18.6
9.3
0.0
27.7
12.3
8.4
14.5
16.0
10.0
14.3
18.7
Composite CO2 (gpm)
444.9
482.6
469.8
461.5
668.7
325.8
213.8
206.6
0.0
510.7
390.5
556.5
518.6
375.9
430.3
436.3
459.9
562.8
317.4
710.1
972.3
607.1
558.9
720.5
566.5
455.2
Composite CO (gpm)
1.18
3.77
17.66
52.65
12.27
43.05
4.97
5.58
0.00
42.52
2.79
5.46
16.16
9.43
6.70
4.64
16.11
274.94
4.73
12.16
56.03
9.31
2.30
100.14
40.08
15.80
Composite NOx (gpm)
0.29
0.44
4.30
1.40
0.78
2.27
1.81
1.72
0.00
1.58
0.51
0.33
1.94
0.92
0.31
1.11
2.68
0.58
0.71
1.18
4.17
1.20
0.46
6.01
1.75
1.68
Composite THC (gpm)
0.13
0.25
0.86
1.52
0.77
3.57
0.34
0.29
0.00
1.30
0.24
0.25
1.94
0.36
0.62
0.27
0.60
5.37
0.19
0.42
3.75
0.27
0.12
10.28
1.06
0.89
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-83
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 815 1
C KS2 816 1
C KS2 818 1
C KS2 820 1
C KS2 821 1
C KS2 821 2
C KS2 822 1
C KS2 823 1
C KS2 824 1
C KS2 825 1
C KS2 826 1
C KS2 826 2
C KS2 827 1
C KS2 827 2
C KS2 828 1
C KS2 829 1
C KS2 829 2
C KS2 829 3
C KS2 830 1
C KS2 833 1
C KS2 834 1
C KS2 835 1
C KS2 836 1
C KS2 836 2
C KS2 837 1
C KS2 838 1
C KS2 839 1
Make
GMC
NISSAN
CHEVROLET
BUICK
CHRYSLER
CHRYSLER
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
FORD
BUICK
BUICK
FORD
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
MERCURY
TOYOTA
DODGE
HONDA
HONDA
PONTIAC
OLDSMOBILE
GMC
Model
SONOMA
PICKUP
LUMINA APV
PARK AVENUE ELECTRA
LEBARON
LEBARON
ELDORADO
LUMINA
ASTROVAN
CARAVAN SE
F250 PICKUP
F250 PICKUP
CENTURY
CENTURY
F-150
PICKUP
PICKUP
PICKUP
CORSICA
TOPAZ
TERCEL SR5
SPIRIT
ACCORD
ACCORD
FIREBIRD
DELTA 88
VANDURA
1
>f
"3
1
1995
1988
1990
1990
1988
1988
1990
1990
1989
1988
1982
1982
1990
1990
1988
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1983
1990
1988
1988
1979
1991
1983
Disp
4.3
2.2
3.1
3.8
2.5
2.5
4.5
3.1
4.3
3
5.3
5.3
3.3
3.3
5
3
3
3
2
2.3
1.6
2.5
2
2
6.6
3.8
5
Test Date
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/15/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/29/2005
3/30/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/16/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
38
32
41
28
31
22
31
65
32
37
36
13
26
1
36
0
30
33
28
25
28
29
31
44
27
55
33
Test Distance (miles)
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.2
8.1
8.0
8.0
4.8
8.0
0.0
8.0
0.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
10.1
8.1
8.1
FuelUsed (gal)
0.45
0.31
0.41
0.46
0.00
0.36
0.49
0.44
0.44
0.46
0.74
0.49
0.43
0.00
0.62
0.00
0.51
0.05
0.39
0.40
0.30
0.35
0.34
0.51
0.75
0.46
0.97
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
17.9
25.8
19.6
17.5
266963.9
22.5
16.3
18.7
18.4
17.3
10.9
9.7
18.7
0.0
12.9
N/A
15.8
161.1
20.8
19.8
26.7
22.9
23.7
N/A
13.4
17.5
8.3
Composite CO2 (gpm)
496.8
327.9
444.6
510.5
0.0
382.0
522.1
468.9
472.8
503.5
665.5
663.0
469.0
678.3
556.4
45.6
419.1
436.6
322.2
369.2
363.4
530.1
510.2
773.2
Composite CO (gpm)
4.40
12.76
8.15
2.96
0.00
10.34
17.93
7.51
10.01
7.43
87.86
147.90
7.06
10.90
8.01
5.83
7.75
10.73
8.45
13.75
8.88
86.32
1.57
194.47
Composite NOx (gpm)
1.16
1.42
1.69
1.51
0.00
1.98
5.48
1.57
4.27
2.92
3.52
2.99
1.20
2.10
3.49
0.24
1.63
1.36
0.93
2.14
1.30
2.73
1.43
1.29
Composite THC (gpm)
0.38
0.59
0.54
0.26
0.00
0.63
1.31
0.31
0.95
1.72
9.59
14.97
0.41
1.29
0.64
0.47
1.03
0.72
0.80
1.07
0.51
4.26
0.17
5.87
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
4-84
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 840 1
C KS2 842 1
C KS2 844 1
C KS2 846 1
C KS2 846 2
C KS2 848 1
C KS2 849 1
C KS2 850 1
C KS2 851 1
C KS2 855 1
C KS2 856 1
C KS2 856 2
C KS2 857 1
C KS2 858 1
C KS2 859 1
C KS2 862 1
C KS2 862 2
C KS2 866 1
C KS2 867 1
C KS2 868 1
C KS2 870 1
C KS2 870 2
C KS2 871 1
C KS2 872 1
C KS2 873 1
C KS2 875 1
C KS2 876 1
Make
FORD
TOYOTA
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
FORD
TOYOTA
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
FORD
BUICK
GMC
GMC
CHEVROLET
FORD
TOYOTA
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
Model
BRONCO
PICKUP
FLEETWOOD
CHEYENNE PICKUP
CHEYENNE PICKUP
EL CAMINO
F-150
RANGER
F-150
CAMRY
CUTLASS
CUTLASS
C-10
F-150
CENTURY
JIMMY
JIMMY
CAPRICE
F-150
PICKUP 4X4 TURBO
CUTLASS SUPREME
CUTLASS SUPREME
NOVA
IMPALA
F-150
MALIBU
G20 VAN
1
>f
"3
1
1990
1983
1989
1973
1973
1976
1986
1990
1988
1990
1989
1989
1983
1988
1988
1992
1992
1985
1978
1987
1987
1987
1976
1973
1990
1980
1989
Disp
5
2.2
5
5
5
5.7
4.9
2.9
4.9
2.5
2.8
2.8
4.1
5
2.8
4.3
4.3
5
6.5
2.4
5
5
4.1
5.7
4.9
3.8
5.7
Test Date
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/19/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/21/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
29
40
24
28
22
28
25
42
24
26
40
40
33
26
31
23
0
30
28
30
32
13
29
37
33
33
33
Test Distance (miles)
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.4
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.0
4.2
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
FuelUsed (gal)
0.62
0.39
0.24
0.00
0.65
0.61
0.57
0.52
0.57
0.41
0.38
0.45
0.64
0.47
0.45
0.30
0.00
0.70
1.06
0.52
0.46
0.28
0.49
1.03
0.42
0.52
0.62
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
13.0
20.5
34.0
133122.7
12.4
13.0
14.2
15.3
14.0
19.9
21.4
18.6
12.6
17.1
17.7
26.7
N/A
11.5
7.7
15.6
17.4
14.7
16.3
7.9
19.3
15.5
13.0
Composite CO2 (gpm)
644.0
414.7
94.3
0.0
448.2
612.7
575.2
559.4
633.6
406.4
400.3
460.0
664.3
512.8
255.5
326.1
588.8
886.4
513.0
501.4
560.2
448.3
942.4
460.2
467.6
661.8
Composite CO (gpm)
29.58
12.77
93.04
0.00
113.56
45.64
22.51
15.93
3.16
26.64
11.48
12.92
28.53
6.48
175.28
6.60
112.48
165.92
30.59
7.82
29.01
57.10
120.90
2.63
70.80
14.80
Composite NOx (gpm)
2.72
1.52
0.03
0.00
1.99
1.97
7.28
4.35
1.95
0.72
1.32
1.21
6.00
1.41
0.11
0.76
2.83
4.14
4.19
4.18
4.72
1.87
2.60
3.44
0.66
2.62
Composite THC (gpm)
0.98
1.74
21.29
0.01
38.27
2.89
8.35
1.74
1.64
1.61
1.05
1.30
3.00
0.98
1.08
0.25
6.42
7.51
5.75
0.87
1.75
5.54
5.05
0.48
1.75
1.52
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
4-85
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 876 2
C KS2 877 1
C KS2 878 1
C KS2 878 2
C KS2 881 1
C KS2 883 1
C KS2 885 1
C KS2 887 1
C KS2 888 1
C KS2 889 1
C KS2 891 1
C KS2 894 1
C KS2 894 2
C KS2 895 1
C KS2 897 1
C KS2 898 1
C KS2 901 1
C KS2 902 1
C KS2 903 1
C KS2 905 1
C KS2 906 1
C KS2 910 1
C KS2 911 1
C KS2 915 1
C KS2 916 1
C KS2 917 1
C KS2 918 1
Make
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
DODGE
DODGE
FORD
CHEVROLET
SATURN
FORD
VW
MAZDA
MAZDA
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
OLDSMOBILE
JEEP
CHEVROLET
OLDSMOBILE
FORD
FORD
TOYOTA
FORD
PONTIAC
CHEVROLET
HONDA
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
Model
G20 VAN
BLAZER 4X4
CARAVAN ES
CARAVAN ES
RANGER XLT
MONTE CARLO
STATION WAGON
MUSTANG
THING
B2200
PROTEGE
SILVERADO 1500
SILVERADO 1500
CUTLASS
CJ-7
CAVALIER
CUTLASS CIERRA
GRANADA
AEROSTAR
CAMRY
ESCAPE
GRAND PRIX
CELEBRITY
CIVIC
VAN 20
F 100 RANGER
ESCORT
1
>f
"3
1
1989
1987
2003
2003
1989
1984
1994
1979
1974
1988
1999
1989
1989
1990
1979
1991
1990
1982
1990
2001
2002
1976
1984
1990
1986
1978
1998
Disp
5.7
2.8
3.8
3.8
2.3
5
1.9
2.3
1.6
2.2
1.6
5
5
3.1
4.2
2.2
3.3
3.3
3
2.2
3
5.7
2.5
1.5
5
4.9
2
Test Date
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
4/1/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
3/28/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/29/2005
3/29/2005
4/1/2005
4/1/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
36
27
36
27
27
30
33
33
35
26
24
29
35
36
69
30
56
39
51
25
32
35
28
42
35
21
25
Test Distance (miles)
7.1
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.3
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.3
8.1
8.0
0.0
FuelUsed (gal)
0.60
0.47
0.49
0.45
0.43
0.38
0.33
0.67
0.35
0.42
0.28
0.59
0.58
0.39
0.70
0.43
0.42
0.49
0.49
0.41
0.37
0.85
0.37
0.33
0.93
0.24
0.00
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
11.7
17.0
16.5
17.7
18.5
21.2
24.2
12.2
23.2
18.9
28.3
13.7
13.7
20.6
11.7
18.7
19.0
16.4
16.6
19.6
21.7
9.5
21.5
24.8
8.7
33.6
0.0
Composite CO2 (gpm)
728.4
503.0
545.0
507.4
464.6
392.4
352.9
524.5
275.1
350.4
306.8
617.3
613.0
421.5
581.1
423.5
455.3
525.5
509.8
447.5
413.7
672.8
402.5
346.7
695.4
260.0
Composite CO (gpm)
20.20
14.06
0.82
0.96
12.42
19.70
10.49
118.91
60.08
76.13
6.59
20.74
22.23
9.50
108.97
32.23
10.83
12.71
19.66
7.07
0.55
168.62
8.83
9.11
189.94
4.42
Composite NOx (gpm)
3.19
6.77
0.67
0.60
1.68
0.65
0.45
1.18
2.59
0.97
1.16
3.42
3.10
1.21
6.31
3.53
1.69
1.35
1.98
0.53
0.09
1.49
1.07
2.45
1.34
2.37
Composite THC (gpm)
2.16
0.95
0.06
0.07
0.99
0.69
0.88
13.37
7.88
4.05
0.14
1.84
2.22
0.27
7.34
2.85
0.80
0.69
0.79
0.21
0.05
7.23
0.46
0.60
20.51
0.61
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
4-86
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 918 2
C KS2 918 3
C KS2 922 1
C KS2 923 1
C KS2 924 1
C KS2 925 1
C KS2 926 1
C KS2 927 1
C KS2 927 2
C KS2 928 1
C KS2 929 1
C KS2 929 2
C KS2 930 1
C KS2 935 1
C KS2 937 1
C KS2 937 2
C KS2 939 1
C KS2 941 1
C KS2 944 1
C KS2 945 1
C KS2 946 1
C KS2 950 1
C KS2 984 1
C KS2 985 1
C KS2 986 1
C KS2 987 1
C KS2 989 1
Make
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
DODGE
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
DODGE
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
TOYOTA
FORD
DODGE
DODGE
CHEVROLET
PLYMOUTH
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
JEEP
FORD
DODGE
DODGE
TOYOTA
FORD
DODGE
Model
ESCORT
ESCORT
BEAUVILLE 10
ESCAPE
FOCUS
CARAVAN SE
F- 150 XL
ASTRO VAN
ASTRO VAN
GRAND CARAVAN SPORT
SUBURBAN
SUBURBAN
FORERUNNER
F-250
CARAVAN
CARAVAN
ASTROVAN
VOYAGER
BLAZER 4X4
VOYAGER
CHEROKEE
CLUB WAGON E150
STRATUS
INTREPID
AVALON
EXPLORER
GRAND CARAVAN
1
>f
"3
1
1998
1998
1979
2005
2005
1992
1995
1994
1994
2000
1997
1997
1998
1995
1995
1995
1992
1992
1993
2002
1996
1989
1999
1995
1998
1993
2003
Disp
2
2
5.7
3
2
3.3
4.9
4.3
4.3
3.3
5.7
5.7
3.4
4.9
3
3
3
3.3
4.3
3.3
2.5
5
2.4
3.3
3
4
3.3
Test Date
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
4/9/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/9/2005
2/7/2005
2/14/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
4/4/2005
Test Duration (minutes)
15
22
22
29
39
39
40
29
1
52
31
35
32
24
52
47
38
38
41
50
41
51
36
40
49
26
30
Test Distance (miles)
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
0.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
18.6
8.0
18.6
18.7
8.1
18.6
8.0
8.0
8.1
8.0
8.1
FuelUsed (gal)
0.01
0.31
0.71
0.39
0.38
0.49
0.51
0.55
0.00
0.54
0.63
0.72
0.43
0.58
0.04
0.42
1.12
0.47
1.06
0.92
0.51
0.64
0.43
0.39
0.36
0.48
0.41
-Si
e.
a
•—
1
N/A
25.4
11.3
20.5
21.5
16.5
15.7
14.7
N/A
14.9
12.8
11.1
18.8
13.9
225.4
19.2
16.5
17.2
17.6
20.4
15.7
29.2
18.8
20.7
22.5
16.7
19.5
Composite CO2 (gpm)
349.7
676.2
434.9
412.1
528.6
545.7
557.9
591.7
677.6
777.3
475.0
638.1
39.0
456.8
503.8
499.4
499.3
439.0
562.8
240.6
460.8
425.5
397.0
528.0
455.3
Composite CO (gpm)
2.74
64.80
0.74
2.65
8.63
4.50
28.99
4.30
13.41
17.76
1.13
4.12
0.19
6.69
21.19
13.58
6.56
0.82
5.07
34.20
10.60
4.28
1.59
7.13
0.66
Composite NOx (gpm)
0.56
2.54
0.08
0.06
3.64
75.58
2.97
0.73
3.62
3.87
0.61
2.10
0.03
1.04
7.33
3.69
1.22
0.43
0.42
0.41
0.91
0.88
0.33
1.33
0.50
Composite THC (gpm)
0.14
5.24
0.12
0.09
0.54
0.91
4.33
0.41
1.14
1.25
0.09
0.65
0.02
0.31
1.94
1.14
0.40
0.05
0.42
4.45
0.32
0.67
0.13
0.51
0.07
«
«
O
•8
QJ
1
VI
X
X
X
X
X
4-87
-------
CTR TST ID
C KS2 989 2
C KS2 1013 1
C KS2 1014 1
Make
DODGE
TOYOTA
MERCURY
Model
GRAND CARAVAN
CAMRY
GRAND MARQUIS
QJ
^
1
§
2003
1994
1994
Disp
3.3
3
4.6
Test Date
4/4/2005
1/19/2005
2/9/2005
5
§
g
3
O
*J
eu
30
59
43
?
£
¥
3
.£
O
*-
eu
8.0
8.0
8.0
I
"S
fe
0.43
0.29
0.51
e.
*— '
r^
(4
*-
H
18.6
28.1
15.8
?
ex
g
'33
o
B.
g
O
U
480.6
317.2
555.7
IT
e.
0
O
£
•53
L
g
o
O
1.07
1.08
7.03
p«
DU
X
0
o
e.
g
o
O
0.20
0.33
0.99
e.
O
H
£
•53
L
g
o
O
0.07
0.32
1.29
«
O
•s
e.
3
4-88
-------
Table 4-14. Round 2 Driveaway Test Results
CTR TST ID
D KS2 618 1
D KS2 677 1
D KS2 679 1
D KS2 689 1
D KS2 689 2
D KS2 698 1
D KS2 698 2
D KS2 703 1
D KS2 704 1
D KS2 705 1
D KS2 711 1
D KS2 722 1
D KS2 723 1
D KS2 724 1
D KS2 726 1
D KS2 729 1
D KS2 730 1
D KS2 730 2
D KS2 734 1
D KS2 735 1
D KS2 739 1
D KS2 739 2
D KS2 745 1
D KS2 753 1
D KS2 759 1
D KS2 760 1
D KS2 764 1
D KS2 766 1
D KS2 769 1
Make
BUICK
PONTIAC
FORD
LINCOLN
LINCOLN
CHRYSLER
CHRYSLER
FORD
CADILLAC
DODGE
MERCURY
VOLVO
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
FORD
FORD
PLYMOUTH
DODGE
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
JEEP
MAZDA
BUICK
JEEP
HONDA
Model
LASABRE
MONTANA
RANGER
TOWN CAR
TOWN CAR
TOWN & COUNTRY LX
TOWN & COUNTRY LX
COUNTRY SQUIRE
SEDAN DEVTLLE
DAKOTA
TOPAZ
960
TEMPO
BLAZER
S-10LS
TOWN & COUNTRY
RANGER
RANGER
VOYAGER
CARAVAN SE
TAURUS
TAURUS
ECONOLINE E 150
WINDSTAR
CHEROKEE
PROTEGE
SKYLARK
GRAND CHEROKEE
CIVIC
Model
Year
1979
2003
1998
1988
1988
2001
2001
1986
1992
2004
1994
1993
1993
1996
1995
1996
1994
1994
1993
1995
1993
1993
2001
1998
1988
1998
1998
1993
1999
Disp
4.9
3.4
4
5
5
3.3
3.3
5
4.9
3.7
2.3
2.9
2.3
4.3
4.3
3.8
o
J
3
o
J
o o
J.J
o
J
o
J
5.4
2
4
1.5
3.1
5.2
1.8
Test Date
N/A
2/11/2005
2/12/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
2/25/2005
2/26/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/2/2005
Test Duration
(minutes)
N/A
285
164
139
101
49
190
76
259
215
240
215
263
280
316
230
241
48
109
169
75
194
472
110
178
374
293
323
232
1>
u
sS
•£
5f
t« «p«
H£
N/A
48.8
40.7
10.9
18.7
18.6
13.8
20.8
21.1
32.1
47.7
40.8
37.7
40.8
50.7
32.9
33.2
18.6
19.6
30.4
18.6
11.3
55.4
11.3
35.3
32.8
60.2
33.2
40.2
13
-52
•a
1>
5«
P
"3
u.
N/A
2.10
2.18
0.89
1.07
0.88
0.14
1.03
1.58
1.42
2.46
1.60
2.12
2.11
2.65
1.63
1.26
0.72
0.86
1.14
0.92
0.84
3.67
0.68
1.87
3.27
1.95
1.86
0.93
-a
8.
S,
w
ta
•£
£
N/A
23.3
18.7
12.2
17.5
21.1
96.7
20.2
13.4
22.6
19.4
25.5
17.8
19.4
19.2
20.3
26.3
26.0
22.8
26.6
20.3
13.5
15.1
16.7
18.8
10.1
30.8
17.8
43.4
Composite
C02 (gpm)
N/A
383.601
474.869
684.39
443.557
418.766
81.49
403.008
342.322
395.931
433.667
351.182
460.366
457.864
454.78
414.799
N/A
339.502
381.814
334.906
435.753
648.561
589.838
531.102
464.985
878.367
291.559
488.76
195.673
Composite
CO (gpm)
N/A
2.019
2.661
28.495
41.189
4.529
1.048
22.486
207.497
1.725
5.067
1.015
7.451
3.737
8.917
17.42
N/A
4.116
7.238
1.171
3.534
6.817
3.393
4.094
7.652
9.696
0.605
8.861
7.41
« '£'
.ts 5
35 a.
0 JM
a M
SO
u z
N/A
0.23
1.081
3.263
2.339
0.785
0.14
2.773
0.173
0.059
1.028
0.311
1.715
0.647
0.612
2.008
N/A
0.364
1.864
0.269
0.768
1.414
0.4
2.467
1.591
0.988
0.259
1.528
0.191
Composite
THC (gpm)
N/A
0.053
0.353
3.16
1.981
0.129
0.264
3.185
8.368
0.096
0.072
0.105
0.54
0.201
0.428
0.631
N/A
0.299
0.371
0.067
0.364
0.932
0.14
0.275
0.521
0.649
0.07
0.47
0.051
I
— S3
-------
CTR TST ID
D KS2 770 1
D KS2 773 1
D KS2 774 1
D KS2 783 1
D KS2 786 1
D KS2 788 1
D KS2 791 1
D KS2 792 1
D KS2 795 1
D KS2 801 1
D KS2 805 1
D KS2 808 1
D KS2 813 1
D KS2 818 1
D KS2 820 1
D KS2 824 1
D KS2 825 1
D KS2 830 1
D KS2 835 1
D KS2 836 1
D KS2 847 1
D KS2 859 1
D KS2 904 1
D KS2 910 1
D KS2 913 1
Make
TOYOTA
FORD
NISSAN
PLYMOUTH
FORD
PLYMOUTH
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
FORD
PLYMOUTH
CHEVROLET
FORD
HONDA
CHEVROLET
BUICK
CHEVROLET
DODGE
CHEVROLET
DODGE
HONDA
CMC
BUICK
SUBARU
PONTIAC
BUICK
Model
CAMRY
E-150
QUEST
VOYAGER
ECONOLINE
ACCLAIM
CAMRY
TRAIL BLAZER
CROWN VICTORIA LTD
VOYAGER SE
CAVALIER
EXPLORER
ACCORD LXI
LUMINA APV
PARK AVENUE ELECTRA
ASTROVAN
CARAVAN SE
CORSICA
SPIRIT
ACCORD
1500 SLE SIERRA
CENTURY
FORESTER
GRAND PRIX
LESABRE
Model
Year
1989
1991
1996
1992
1996
1989
1999
2002
1989
1988
1995
1994
1988
1990
1990
1989
1988
1989
1990
1988
1988
1988
2001
1976
1990
Disp
2.5
4.9
3
2.5
4.9
2.5
2.2
4.2
5
3
2.2
4
2
3.1
3.8
4.3
3
2
2.5
2
5.7
2.8
2.5
5.7
3.8
Test Date
3/5/2005
3/3/2005
3/5/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/13/2005
3/14/2005
3/16/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/31/2005
3/18/2005
3/21/2005
3/28/2005
3/30/2005
3/31/2005
Test Duration
(minutes)
677
293
129
310
440
510
156
348
115
52
331
393
531
222
187
20
305
405
103
562
353
235
109
317
453
8
•£
5f
31
62.6
52.9
31.5
42.7
34.1
78.8
42.6
56.9
7.5
8.1
18.7
27.5
35.7
38.8
58.1
3.0
38.9
13.5
30.2
44.1
31.5
39.8
23.4
32.6
42.6
^
-52
i
G«
p
"3
to
2.25
3.59
1.29
1.77
2.03
2.81
1.78
3.05
0.53
0.45
0.66
1.64
1.61
1.36
2.51
0.28
1.78
0.73
1.20
1.78
2.10
1.84
0.96
3.12
1.88
/3b
a.
S,
W
u.
1
H
27.8
14.7
24.4
24.2
16.8
28.1
23.9
18.7
14.0
17.9
28.3
16.8
22.2
28.5
23.1
10.7
21.9
18.4
25.1
24.8
15.0
21.7
24.4
10.5
22.7
Composite
C02 (gpm)
319.434
564.493
364.925
347.368
532.548
307.99
371.101
479.503
619.052
484.622
306.899
518.482
380.369
307.7
384.258
804.307
397.207
466.347
337.901
343.804
578.631
203.899
362.232
667.948
380.574
Composite
CO (gpm)
2.198
21.576
2.103
14.897
2.257
7.963
3.413
2.272
10.784
9.561
6.14
9.847
15.321
4.722
2.652
21.621
6.27
10.08
11.944
10.172
11.976
138.646
3.774
117.053
9.196
at
35 a.
0 JM
S *
o 0
U Z
1.142
4.39
0.347
3.646
1.861
2.552
0.387
0.255
1.509
3.658
0.763
1.449
1.718
0.928
1.637
6.235
2.16
1.605
2.231
1.04
1.583
0.2
5.764
2.47
0.656
Composite
THC (gpm)
0.068
4.149
0.128
0.457
0.127
0.206
0.19
0.047
1.996
1.201
0.393
0.253
0.565
0.276
0.214
0.845
1.452
1.427
0.686
0.392
0.763
5.81
0.136
4.294
0.327
I
— S3
•K -JJ
s S.
y-j Q
4-90
-------
A fuel economy comparison of Round 2 conditioning runs and LA92 drive cycle tests
performed on the dynamometer is shown with a 1:1 reference line in Figure 4-17. Appendices F
and L provide formulas for calculating fuel economy from both the dynamometer and the PEMS.
Results listed as "suspicious" in Tables 4-12 and 4-13 are excluded from Figure 4-17.
Scatter Plot of Average Fuel Economy (miles/gallon) Round2=SbS Calculation
60
50
40
30
20 •
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
SEMTECH Conditioning Test Fuel Economy (mpg)
/proJ1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2/SumPred_Dyno_Diive.8a8 25JUL06 10:57
Figure 4-17. By-Vehicle Comparison of Conditioning Run vs. Dynamometer
Testing Fuel Economy for Round 2
A fuel economy comparison of the 51 vehicles that received driveaway tests and LA92
dynamometer tests performed during Round 2 is shown in Figure 4-18. Figure 4-19 provides a
by-vehicle comparison of Round 2 condition run vs. driveaway test fuel economy. 1:1 lines are
provided for reference. As previously discussed, these figures reveal differences in results using
the same test system (PEMS) but different tests (dynamometer LA-92 vs. standardized
conditioning route vs. "real-world driving").
Table 4-15 contains results of the Round 2 fuel samples that were analyzed during the
study. Results of all fuel analysis performed prior to April 2006 were included in the MSOD
data submission for this study and are shown in Table 4-15. Results of fuels analysis performed
after April 2006 were not included in the MSOD submission (and are not shown in Table 4-15)
but are included in Appendix FF (KC_fuels_analysis_complete.pdf) for reference.
4-91
-------
Scatter Plot of Average Fuel Economy (miles/gallon) Round2=SbS Calculation
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
SEMTECH DriveAway Fuel Economy (mpg)
/proJ1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2/SumPred_Dyno_Drive.8a8 25JUL06 10:57
Figure 4-18. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Dynamometer Testing Fuel
Economy for Round 2
Scatter Plot of Average Fuel Economy (miles/gallon) Round2=SbS Calculation
so
40
30
20
10
0
60
10 20 30 40 50
SEMTECH DriveAway Fuel Economy (mpg)
/projiyKansasCity/Analysis/Round2/SurnPred_Dyno_Drive.sas 25JUL06 10:57
Figure 4-19. By-Vehicle Comparison of Driveaway vs. Conditioning Run Fuel
Economy for Round 2
4-92
-------
Table 4-15. Fuel Analysis Results from Round 2 Vehicle Samples
Laboratory
Fuel Batch ID
13629
13720
13721
13722
13723
13724
13725
13736
13739
13827
13828
13829
13830
13831
13832
13833
13834
13835
13836
13837
13838
13843
13844
13845
13846
13847
13848
13850
14276
14278
14279
14280
14281
a
J£
^CJ
1
KS2 533
KS2 685
KS2 575
KS2 634
KS2 622
KS2 579
KS2 568
KS2 670
KS2 679
KS2 605
KS2 756
KS2 675
KS2 569
KS2 596
KS2 572
KS2 556
KS2 594
KS2 786
KS2 626
KS2 582
KS2 740
KS2 757
KS2 872
KS2 773
KS2 917
KS2 910
KS2 776
KS2 623
KS2 782
KS2 725
KS2 736
KS2 618
KS2 727
Sulfur (ppm)
134
258
330
214
153
129
103
255
346
310
163
235
101
206
292
373
130
177
350
351
273
129
131
128
197
143
121
84
119
195
230
172
139
M
_g
§8
1 a
a is
78
79
82
79
80
78
82
80
82
80
83
82
82
79
81
81
80
88
80
84
81
84
84
86
91
84
86
83
82
83
83
81
84
10%
Distillation
Point (F)
95
101
100
98
99
97
105
96
102
102
104
101
99
100
96
100
99
109
100
100
103
107
108
112
127
111
113
108
105
103
104
98
104
50%
Distillation
Point (F)
193
199
196
198
198
199
215
193
196
201
196
197
193
200
199
199
201
159
198
195
202
197
199
203
214
200
204
219
192
199
195
199
194
90%
Distillation
Point (F)
327
320
320
323
328
328
321
319
318
322
328
323
322
324
321
318
329
321
319
319
321
332
330
328
329
330
332
323
323
322
321
329
331
§
"a
1
•a
a
w
421
402
399
407
427
433
410
401
403
412
406
405
412
430
406
403
425
408
401
405
411
413
423
411
408
419
426
409
414
407
408
425
413
tu
1
03
•S£
•a >
D 03
£o
0.7251
0.7276
0.7282
0.7276
0.7263
0.7243
0.7313
0.7266
0.7268
0.7276
0.7323
0.7299
0.7278
0.7282
0.7257
0.7272
0.727
0.7366
0.7259
0.7262
0.7275
0.7335
0.7346
0.7357
0.7416
0.7332
0.7323
0.7338
0.7265
0.7288
0.7285
0.7238
0.7295
03
§
8
g
&ta
0§
63.64
62.97
62.81
62.97
63.33
63.85
62.01
63.25
63.2
62.98
61.73
62.37
62.93
62.82
63.49
63.07
63.13
60.61
63.43
63.34
63.01
61.42
61.12
60.84
59.3
61.49
61.73
61.34
63.26
62.67
62.73
63.99
62.47
5?
§£
M M
^5
0 £
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
"03
=
01
M 01
^s
0 H
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
ETHANOL
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
Total Recovery
(mL)
96.3
96.4
96.7
96.3
96.8
97
96.9
96.9
96.8
96.8
96.3
96.9
96.8
96.6
96.4
96.8
96.6
97.6
96.8
96.7
96.7
97.3
96.6
97.5
97.7
96.8
97.6
97.3
96.8
96.7
96.8
96.6
96.9
Residue (mL)
0.4
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
1
3
&
(K
(K
3
3.3
2.9
2.4
3
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.2
2.5
2.4
2.9
2.4
2.4
2.6
3
2.4
2.5
1.7
2.3
2.5
2.4
1.9
2.6
1.7
1.4
2.3
1.7
2
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.1
,— \
. *«l
Sa
>"!
. *
•o *
2 2
ot a.
14
13.6
14.1
14.5
14.5
14.5
12.8
14.3
13.8
13.3
12.2
13.5
14.1
13.8
14.2
14.2
13.3
12.8
13.5
14.2
13.1
12.2
11.3
12.3
9.2
11
11.6
12.2
12.6
12.7
12.4
14
12.7
?
I
^
=
o>
O
9.9
9.5
8.8
9.2
10.5
10
5.3
8.9
9.7
9.6
10.5
10.7
11.4
9.4
9.7
10.2
10.8
9.3
10.6
9.4
9.8
10.3
9.5
9.7
8.9
11.7
7.2
5
7.8
9.4
9.7
10.7
13.1
Saturates
(Vol %)
68.7
68.7
68.8
69.3
67.7
69.5
70.2
68.7
67.6
68.6
65.1
65.2
63
68.9
69
67.5
67.5
68.3
65.4
68.7
69
63.8
65.8
64.7
64.6
64.4
70.5
69.5
70.4
68.2
67.7
68.8
62.9
Aromatics
(Vol %)
21.4
21.8
22.4
21.5
21.8
20.5
24.5
22.4
22.7
21.8
24.4
24.1
25.6
21.7
21.3
22.3
21.7
22.4
24
21.9
21.2
25.9
24.7
25.6
26.5
23.9
22.3
25.5
21.8
22.4
22.6
20.5
24
4-93
-------
Laboratory
Fuel Batch ID
14282
14283
14285
14286
14287
14288
14290
0
_o>
CJ
IS
01
KS2 632
KS2 619
KS2 640
KS2 633
KS2 819
KS2 801
KS2 721
Min
Mean
Median
Max
StdDev
o.
a
s.
Sa
s
to
347
389
86
77
146
94
290
77.00
202.50
174.50
389.00
93.67
Initial Boiling
Point (F)
79
79
81
84
85
80
81
78.00
82.03
82.00
91.00
2.74
10%
Distillation
Point (F)
98
99
103
108
110
102
101
95.00
103.18
102.00
127.00
6.00
50%
Distillation
Point (F)
198
198
218
221
198
196
197
159.00
199.20
198.00
221.00
9.68
90%
Distillation
Point (F)
318
317
322
315
329
323
320
315.00
323.63
322.50
332.00
4.65
End Point (F)
401
397
408
408
416
416
400
397.00
411.23
408.50
433.00
9.15
Specific
Gravity at 60 F
0.7234
0.7245
0.7329
0.7383
0.7312
0.7231
0.7287
0.72
0.73
0.73
0.74
0.00
Degrees API at
60 F
64.12
63.82
61.58
60.16
62.02
64.18
62.68
59.30
62.55
62.88
64.18
1.13
5?
= -w
M"M
ff'S
0*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.89
0.00
0.11
0.00
3.33
0.54
S
03
=
01
M 01
b £;
OH
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Recovery
(mL)
96.7
96.7
96.8
96.9
97.1
96.7
96.8
96.30
96.84
96.80
97.70
0.34
Residue (mL)
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
1
1
0.9
0.40
0.81
0.80
1.00
0.13
3
S.
<*1
<*1
$
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.3
1.9
2.3
2.3
1.40
2.36
2.40
3.30
0.37
Reid Vapor
Pressure (psi)
14
13.7
12.7
12.1
11.4
13.1
13.7
9.20
13.08
13.30
14.50
1.15
?
I
fi
a
o>
0
9.2
9.8
5.2
3.7
8.9
8.9
9
3.70
9.27
9.55
13.10
1.82
Saturates
(Vol %)
70.2
69.6
69.1
68.5
67.1
70.9
68.2
62.90
67.76
68.55
70.90
2.14
Aromatics
(Vol %)
20.6
20.6
25.7
27.8
24
20.2
22.8
20.20
22.97
22.40
27.80
1.89
4-94
-------
4.4.3 Control vehicle results
4.4.3.1 Round 1 Control Vehicle Test Results
Five LA92 dynamometer tests were performed for a 1988 Ford Taurus control vehicle at
EPA's testing facility in Ann Arbor, MI. Results for these tests are presented in Table 4-16.
Table 4-16. Emissions Summary for Ann Arbor Control Vehicle Testing
Test ID IPhase
VETSO 12378
VETSO 12378
VETSO 12378
VETS012380
VETS012380
VETS012380
VETS012384
VETS012384
VETS012384
VETSO 12395
VETSO 12395
VETSO 12395
VETSO 12398
VETSO 12398
VETSO 12398
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
HC (g/mi)
4.058
1.93
3.076
3.881
1.799
3.015
3.853
1.847
2.952
4.07
1.867
3.015
3.887
1.897
2.982
CO (g/mi)
25.897
13.328
20.455
28.92
13.73
21.487
29.673
13.126
20.811
29.92
13.004
22.147
29.82
13.153
21.39
NOX (g/mi)
5.875
3.947
6.1
6.191
3.927
5.994
5.782
3.83
6.198
5.722
3.65
5.602
5.896
3.7
5.605
CO2 (g/mi)
617.341
370.998
527.129
622.316
369.915
525.609
602.62
365.109
523.356
619.329
367.479
524.237
609.913
365.632
522.037
PM (mg/mi)
32.016
10.093
5.219
11.46
6.39
6.164
11.964
8.815
6.434
22.228
5.846
4.193
13.908
4.814
6.354
A total of twelve LA92 dynamometer tests were performed for the same 1988 Ford
Taurus control vehicle on site in Kansas City. Nine of the tests used a hot-wire flow meter and
the remaining three tests were performed using a new pitot-tube flow meter for the PEMS
measurements. Table 4-17 shows an emission summary of the dynamometer control tests
performed in Kansas City measured with the PEMS in comparison with emissions measured by
the dynamometer bench, by phase and composite (comp) measurements. Highlighted emission
values (in blue) represent measurements taken with the newer pitot-tube flowmeter. In order to
eliminate any opportunity for pitot-tube orifices to become blocked with particulate matter or ice,
pitot-tube flowmeters were purged with high-pressure dry nitrogen gas prior to each test, and the
flowmeters were stored in above-freezing temperatures when not in use.
4-95
-------
Table 4-17. Round 1 by Phase Emissions Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in Kansas City
RunID
84081
84081
84081
84081
84114
84114
84114
84114
84143
84143
84143
84143
84177
84177
84177
84177
84187
84187
84187
84187
84218
84218
84218
84218
84259
84259
84259
84259
84290
84290
84290
84290
84348
84348
84348
84348
84360
Phase
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
Temp (F)
76.4
93.5
81.5
74.1
77.4
81.0
72.0
87.7
79.6
RH (%)
5
40.6
45.0 .
38.2 .
35.0
54.2
60.8
0
47.9 .
39.0
3
26.8
HC (g/mi)
PEMS
2.07
04 3.3
2.31
5.13
2.06
3.33
2.31
5.09
2.06
3.28
2.3
1.3
0.41
0.46
51
5.07
2.1
2.34
43 5.39
2.22
3.75
2.49
5.36
Dyno
5.35
2.1
3.55
2.36
5.35
2.2
4.03
2.49
6.55
2.08
3.55
2.41
5.34
2.07
3.59
2.35
5.34
2.13
3.51
2.39
5.43
2.26
3.8
2.53
6.17
2.17
3.54
2.47
5.2
2.15
3.48
2.4
5.2
2.05
3.42
2.3
5.44
CO (g/mi)
PEMS
36.9
14.75
21.86
16.38
33.65
14.02
21.98
15.58
32.64
15.98
20.42
17.16
7.36
2.92
2.97
3.15
35.33
15.05
23.7
16.7
34.48
14.51
23.95
16.19
32.75
Dyno
34.95
13.29
20.33
14.89
27.88
14.49
24.31
15.85
32.54
13.18
20.18
14.67
32.11
13.48
21.63
15
31.23
15.26
20
16.43
27.19
13.58
20.05
14.72
38.12
13.47
21.39
15.28
29.58
13.11
19.62
14.42
30.89
12.85
20.37
14.29
31.28
NOX (g/mi)
PEMS
7.23
6.61
7.1
6.67
7.16
6
6.52
6.09
7.2
6.67
7.59
6.76
3.74
1.3
1.54
1.44
7.05
6.64
7.52
6.73
6.44
4.85
6.09
5.01
5.93
Dyno
6.88
5.54
7.07
5.71
8.1
6.78
8.39
6.96
7.49
5.72
6.98
5.9
7.07
5.38
6.58
5.55
7.57
6.37
7.97
6.54
7.27
6.14
8.01
6.33
7.74
5.95
7.12
6.12
6.95
6.03
7.2
6.16
7.04
5.5
6.77
5.66
7.86
C02(
PEMS
658.16
400.34
556.98
424.33
629
372.86
510.4
395.52
621.04
387.53
544.32
410.54
214.91
78.14
95.97
86.17
677.75
411.65
586.5
437.55
718.31
413.2
616.86
442.89
683.84
g/mi)
Dyno
653.31
384.22
544.6
409.04
699.36
399.54
572.8
426.75
697.04
392.47
560.04
419.84
666.3
383.39
535.89
408.46
659.96
405.57
574.61
430.52
668.85
398.89
580.22
425.28
684.21
392.9
520.83
416.7
639.47
380.71
533.41
404.72
662.79
383.73
539.02
408.78
658.38
PM2.5
(mg/mi)
5.45
1.28
0.54
1.44
2.55
0.73
0.9
0.84
13.53
0.87
1.42
1.56
5.31
1
1.2
1.24
5.14
1.47
1.34
1.66
4.59
0.61
1.4
0.87
7.58
0.8
2
1.23
8.01
4.01
36.51
6.47
6.11
0.21
9.37
1.15
6.38
Distance
(miles)
1.18
8.64
1.17
10.99
1.17
8.61
1.17
10.95
1.19
8.64
1.19
11.02
1.17
8.64
1.19
11
1.2
8.66
1.19
11.05
1.18
8.61
1.18
10.96
1.18
8.65
1.18
11.01
1.18
8.62
1.2
10.99
1.16
8.61
1.19
10.96
1.2
PEMS
DATA
Suspect
X
X
X
Dyno
DATA
Suspect
X
4-96
-------
RunID
84360
84360
84360
84374
84374
84374
84374
84387
84387
84387
84387
Phase
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
Temp (F)
77.6
73.7
72.0
RH (%)
51.5
17.5
14.1
HC (g/mi)
PEMS
2.17
3.68
2.44
5.25
2.1
3.47
2.35
5.34
2.25
3.44
2.5
Dyno
2.05
3.52
2.33
5.47
2.04
3.41
2.31
5.92
2.17
3.49
2.45
CO (g/mi)
PEMS
14
23.58
15.65
32.01
14.49
22.04
15.91
33.13
13.3
21.07
14.9
Dyno
12.91
20.96
14.43
32.02
13.79
20.23
15.17
36.26
12.9
19.78
14.6
NOX (g/mi)
PEMS
4.8
6.22
4.96
5.96
4.71
5.82
4.85
5.75
4.48
5.43
4.61
Dyno
6.24
7.98
6.45
6.86
5.45
6.82
5.61
5.84
4.58
5.56
4.72
C02 (g/mi)
PEMS
398.71
592.59
427.2
671.99
394.49
575.84
421.23
630.52
375.99
533.35
400.57
Dyno
381.41
538.64
406.81
674.8
392.19
553.01
417.81
663.77
385.07
531.4
409.91
PM2.5
(mg/mi)
0.63
1.42
0.98
3.13
0.37
0.32
0.51
4.97
1.06
0.99
1.26
Distance
(miles)
8.74
1.22
11.17
1.17
8.6
1.19
10.95
1.21
8.76
1.23
11.21
PEMS
DATA
Suspect
Dyno
DATA
Suspect
4-97
-------
Table 4-18 presents a composite emissions summary for Round 1 control testing.
Average and standard deviation of the reported emission values were calculated and are listed at
the bottom of Table 4-18, both including an excluding Run 84218.
Table 4-18. Round 1 Composite Emission Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in
Kansas City
RunID
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
All Avg
All Std
Avg*
Std*
Composite HC (g/mi)
PEMS
2.31
2.31
2.30
0.46
2.34
2.49
2.44
2.35
2.50
2.17
0.64
2.38
0.08
Dyno
2.36
2.49
2.41
2.35
2.39
2.53
2.47
2.40
2.30
2.33
2.31
2.45
2.40
0.07
2.39
0.06
%Diff
2.36
1.65
3.85
81.72
2.45
7.88
4.67
2.04
1.83
12.05
26.20
3.34
2.11
Composite CO (g/mi)
PEMS
16.38
15.58
17.16
3.15
16.70
16.19
15.65
15.91
14.90
14.62
4.35
16.06
0.71
Dyno
14.89
15.85
14.67
15.00
16.43
14.72
15.28
14.42
14.29
14.43
15.17
14.60
14.98
0.63
15.00
0.66
%Diff
10.00
3.87
4.45
78.58
15.81
13.24
8.41
4.87
2.03
15.70
24.02
7.84
4.89
Composite NOX (g/mi)
PEMS
6.67
6.09
6.76
1.44
6.73
5.01
4.96
4.85
4.61
5.24
1.68
5.71
0.94
Dyno
5.71
6.96
5.90
5.55
6.54
6.33
6.12
6.16
5.66
6.45
5.61
4.72
5.98
0.58
5.94
0.60
%Diff
16.85
9.89
3.39
77.33
9.22
11.50
23.15
13.57
2.25
18.57
22.94
11.23
6.84
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
PEMS
424.33
395.52
410.54
86.17
437.55
442.89
427.20
421.23
400.57
382.89
112.37
419.98
16.78
Dyno
409.04
426.75
419.84
408.46
430.52
425.28
416.70
404.72
408.78
406.81
417.81
409.91
415.39
8.70
414.49
8.52
%Diff
3.74
3.17
4.64
79.74
8.11
8.35
5.01
0.82
2.28
12.87
25.20
4.51
2.64
PM2.5
(mg/mi)
1.44
0.84
1.56
1.24
1.66
0.87
1.23
6.47
1.15
0.98
0.51
.26
.60
.57
.67
.63
* Statistic values were compiled from all runs except run 84218.
4.4.3.2 Round 2 Control Vehicle Test Results
A total of twelve LA92 dynamometer tests were performed for the same 1988 Ford
Taurus control vehicle that was used for Round 1 control testing in Kansas City and Ann Arbor.
All Round 2 testing was conducted using pressure-differential flow meter for the PEMS exhaust
flow measurements. Table 4-19 shows an emissions summary of the dynamometer control tests
performed in Kansas City measured with the PEMS in comparison with emissions measured by
the dynamometer bench.
4-98
-------
Table 4-19. Round 2 by Phase Emissions Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in Kansas City
RunID
84451
84451
84451
84451
84461
84461
84461
84461
84480
84480
84480
84480
84536
84536
84536
84536
84544
84544
84544
84544
84578
84578
84578
84578
84596
84596
84596
84596
84606
84606
84606
Phase
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Temp
(F)
37.6
43.9
40.2
51.7
54.0
43.8
37.4
RH
(%)
61.3
50.6
69.6
1.2
49.7
55.9
41.9
HC (g/mi)
PEMS
5.23
0.10
0.26
0.38
7.98
2.46
3.80
2.85
7.81
2.45
3.98
2.84
8.04
2.52
3.99
2.91
8.25
2.46
4.04
2.87
7.93
2.57
4.36
2.97
2.61
0.08
0.32
0.23
9.23
2.35
3.96
Dyno
5.52
0.10
0.31
0.40
7.73
2.22
3.39
2.59
8.20
2.35
3.66
2.74
7.93
2.33
3.59
2.71
7.68
2.29
3.66
2.67
7.45
2.33
3.75
2.70
2.76
0.07
0.26
0.22
9.35
2.26
3.58
CO (g/mi)
PEMS
75.65
3.33
6.49
7.35
84.41
17.97
27.29
22.12
85.63
18.92
28.17
23.02
82.15
17.32
28.41
21.50
83.95
18.37
32.66
22.81
84.77
18.67
30.48
22.94
43.96
3.41
4.70
5.63
96.47
18.53
31.44
Dyno
80.77
2.85
5.75
7.10
69.40
15.05
20.43
18.28
75.59
17.11
20.85
20.41
69.75
15.13
20.91
18.43
64.55
15.56
23.39
18.70
66.25
15.86
21.70
18.92
44.56
3.28
3.33
5.46
79.62
16.45
21.77
NOX (g/mi)
PEMS
2.99
1.03
1.30
1.15
5.90
5.49
7.82
5.67
6.61
5.70
7.61
5.88
6.30
5.40
6.82
5.54
6.00
5.49
7.37
5.64
6.42
5.26
6.75
5.42
2.58
0.64
1.12
0.77
5.91
5.15
6.88
Dyno
3.27
1.10
1.49
1.24
5.92
4.94
6.00
5.07
6.15
5.20
6.71
5.36
5.38
4.59
5.21
4.68
5.88
4.98
6.43
5.13
6.17
4.98
5.89
5.10
2.43
0.67
1.14
0.80
5.62
4.82
5.96
CO2 (g/mi)
PEMS
777.86
452.31
604.31
480.06
701.86
404.78
587.57
433.21
766.18
424.64
620.07
455.89
758.84
409.04
590.62
440.18
725.71
404.19
599.19
434.62
758.51
414.82
624.20
447.29
798.00
438.02
591.70
467.60
748.72
402.34
602.65
Dyno
751.03
435.12
578.39
461.47
653.87
382.08
510.60
405.38
717.55
409.46
550.38
435.12
688.07
391.94
515.45
416.26
658.37
388.53
532.41
412.84
678.12
392.47
527.04
416.83
740.10
437.63
542.37
460.89
679.46
391.20
510.53
PM2.5
(mg/mi)
39.06
2.84
1.46
4.62
46.54
2.98
3.06
5.26
49.90
3.99
4.83
6.44
48.30
3.88
2.49
6.14
47.00
5.28
5.65
7.52
32.10
3.74
4.60
5.29
1.67
1.89
0.77
1.80
51.20
3.23
3.62
Distance
(miles)
1.19
8.68
1.20
11.08
1.21
8.72
1.22
11.16
1.20
8.68
1.18
11.05
1.22
8.66
1.21
11.09
1.23
8.74
1.21
11.18
1.21
8.65
1.20
11.06
1.21
8.68
1.21
11.11
1.18
8.66
1.21
PEMS
DATASuspect
Dyno
DATASuspect
X
X
X
4-99
-------
RunID
84606
84624
84624
84624
84624
84651
84651
84651
84651
84697
84697
84697
84697
84741
84741
84741
84741
Phase
Comp
1
2
o
J
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
o
J
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
Temp
(F)
51.9
44.6
46.1
42.6
53.9
RH
(%)
40.9
35.0
34.2
69.4
43.0
HC (g/mi)
PEMS
2.82
9.02
2.44
3.78
2.87
9.77
2.55
4.16
3.03
2.26
1.19
1.73
1.28
8.69
2.92
4.32
3.32
Dyno
2.72
8.36
2.16
3.26
2.56
9.58
2.30
3.66
2.77
8.23
2.41
3.91
2.82
7.92
2.39
3.70
2.77
CO (g/mi)
PEMS
23.48
109.72
20.53
31.09
25.89
101.18
19.61
32.27
24.70
101.79
22.34
37.67
27.62
85.84
20.09
31.00
24.33
Dyno
20.08
88.34
17.89
22.20
21.85
82.64
17.09
23.05
20.88
73.10
17.52
24.26
20.92
62.04
15.78
21.66
18.62
NOX (g/mi)
PEMS
5.31
4.85
4.74
6.68
4.88
5.13
4.41
5.90
4.55
5.89
4.67
6.25
4.85
5.44
4.63
6.21
4.79
Dyno
4.94
4.68
4.28
5.62
4.40
5.48
4.50
5.65
4.63
5.96
4.78
5.88
4.92
5.69
4.75
5.95
4.88
CO2 (g/mi)
PEMS
434.25
709.87
394.42
587.65
424.38
766.92
407.49
599.09
439.31
815.75
458.85
654.52
491.50
740.86
440.52
619.51
469.02
Dyno
414.42
636.64
372.95
503.89
395.84
691.08
388.32
513.51
412.64
670.52
391.96
516.64
415.37
627.60
384.35
511.17
406.04
PM2.5
(mg/mi)
5.73
46.80
1.55
2.22
3.93
71.62
4.27
5.51
7.82
35.40
3.14
4.33
4.92
38.55
2.71
3.11
4.61
Distance
(miles)
11.05
1.20
8.77
1.23
11.21
1.18
8.67
1.20
11.06
1.21
8.66
1.22
11.09
1.21
8.71
1.23
11.16
PEMS
DATASuspect
Dyno
DATASuspect
4-100
-------
Table 4-20 presents a composite emissions summary for Round 2 control testing.
Average and standard deviation values are reported at the bottom of Table 4-20, both for all runs,
and also for all runs except Run numbers 84451 and 84697. In general, the dynamometer (BKI)
emission measurements appear to be lower than those measured by the PEMS (SMT).
Additional investigation may be warranted to identify the source of this discrepancy. Results
from the "Measurement Allowance for In-Use Testing" study being conducted in 2006 at
Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas may provide insight into any possible PEMS
bias issues. Additional analysis of the dynamometer correlation results between the EPA
dynamometer in Ann Arbor and the EPA portable Clayton dynamometer gathered during the
Kansas City Pilot Study may provide insight into any possible dynamometer bias issues.
4-101
-------
Table 4-20. Round 2 Composite Emission Summary for Control Vehicle Testing in Kansas City
RunID
84451
84461
84480
84536
84544
84578
84596
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
All Avg
All Std
average*
st dev*
Composite HC (g/mi)
PEMS
0.38
2.85
2.84
2.91
2.87
2.97
0.23
2.82
2.87
3.03
1.28
3.32
2.36
1.08
2.46
1.08
Dyno
0.40
2.59
2.74
2.71
2.67
2.70
0.22
2.72
2.56
2.77
2.82
2.77
2.31
0.94
2.26
0.97
%Diff
-5.22
8.82
3.37
6.80
7.03
9.29
2.60
3.44
10.83
8.71
-119.56
16.48
-3.95
36.79
6.56
5.55
Composite CO (g/mi)
PEMS
7.35
22.12
23.02
21.50
22.81
22.94
5.63
23.48
25.89
24.70
27.62
24.33
20.95
6.97
20.34
6.97
Dyno
7.10
18.28
20.41
18.43
18.70
18.92
5.46
20.08
21.85
20.88
20.92
18.62
17.47
5.37
17.16
5.51
%Diff
3.40
17.34
11.34
14.30
18.01
17.54
3.01
14.47
15.60
15.44
24.26
23.49
14.85
6.55
13.99
6.12
Composite NOX (g/mi)
PEMS
1.15
5.67
5.88
5.54
5.64
5.42
0.77
5.31
4.88
4.55
4.85
4.79
4.54
1.72
4.51
1.80
Dyno
1.24
5.07
5.36
4.68
5.13
5.10
0.80
4.94
4.40
4.63
4.92
4.88
4.26
1.54
4.20
1.60
%Diff
-7.67
10.65
8.85
15.63
9.21
5.93
-2.88
6.93
9.88
-1.84
-1.48
-1.97
4.27
7.13
4.79
7.24
Composite CO2 (g/mi)
PEMS
480.06
433.21
455.89
440.18
434.62
447.29
467.60
434.25
424.38
439.31
491.50
469.02
451.44
21.21
447.80
17.88
Dyno
461 .47
405.38
435.12
416.26
412.84
416.83
460.89
414.42
395.84
412.64
415.37
406.04
421.09
20.85
421.61
21.78
%Diff
3.87
6.43
4.56
5.43
5.01
6.81
1.43
4.57
6.73
6.07
15.49
13.43
6.65
3.96
5.85
2.95
PM2.5
(mg/mi)
4.62
5.26
6.44
6.14
7.52
5.29
1.80
5.73
3.93
7.82
4.92
4.61
5.34
1.61
5.38
1.69
! Statistic values were compiled from all runs except run 84697
4-102
-------
4.4.4 Comparison of Emissions from Vehicles Measured in Both Rounds of the
Study
Forty-one vehicles were tested in both Rounds 1 and 2 for the purpose of comparing
summer and winter vehicle emissions. Four of these vehicles were tested twice for a total of
forty-five valid retest pairs across Rounds 1 and 2 (two vehicles were tested with different load
settings and were therefore excluded from this evaluation). Table 4-21 presents composite
emissions for both Rounds. Figures 4-20 through 4-27 present linear and logarithmic plots
comparing composite gravimetric PM2.5, HC, CO, and NOX across the two Rounds of testing,
with a 1:1 line provided for reference. Figures 4-28 through 4-31 present plots of each pollutant
versus ambient temperature. Appendices G and H contains by-phase plots for all pollutants of
interest.
4-103
-------
Table 4-21. Round 1/ Round 2 Retest Composite Emissions
Round 1
*
=
«
84078
84037
84055
84309
84110
84115
84271
84271
84342
84342
84097
84069
84042
84171
84347
84058
84349
84125
84036
84119
84104
84113
84263
84063
84332
84341
84146
84151
84305
84150
84336
84381
84040
84108
84338
84339
84329
84344
84211
84048
84296
84071
84088
84188
84298
g
o.
1
70.45
83.18
95.84
78.17
84.69
83.99
81.51
81.51
77.46
77.46
69.85
76.81
75.97
70.82
77.85
87.30
66.81
80.85
80.53
91.94
78.06
91.05
74.48
85.32
76.78
76.02
82.37
69.41
74.18
68.26
82.22
76.74
80.95
87.62
77.22
77.95
83.21
71.33
71.93
83.23
68.06
77.22
80.14
80.21
74.01
?
^-^
70.3
58.5
50.1
42.1
56.8
57.1
30.2
30.2
46.0
46.0
65.0
84.1
75.6
44.8
31.4
65.2
60.0
59.9
65.7
44.5
55.7
47.8
41.8
72.5
39.7
54.3
46.6
46.8
42.5
48.5
33.4
17.8
75.6
38.7
46.7
46.6
38.3
49.3
69.1
63.9
64.6
84.5
40.8
45.7
44.2
|o
tl
2 &
0 &
0.47
9.12
4.80
43.42
10.01
7.60
5.66
5.66
0.27
0.27
0.73
0.49
2.63
40.75
12.55
1.04
0.84
3.39
1.78
6.10
1.56
1.53
19.61
2.06
2.24
7.65
9.16
1.45
1.22
4.70
10.44
31.49
4.79
2.96
0.85
3.56
10.64
2.86
31.90
59.98
2.99
38.43
1.22
40.64
26.89
wl
0.12
1.56
1.07
9.25
0.20
0.23
1.28
1.28
0.19
0.19
0.08
0.21
0.31
1.19
0.36
0.13
0.10
0.22
0.20
1.84
0.19
0.89
1.21
0.13
0.15
0.19
1.18
0.09
0.13
0.16
0.59
0.49
0.36
0.64
0.06
0.19
0.20
0.38
0.46
1.10
0.09
2.23
0.23
4.71
0.24
si
2.76
32.78
9.77
174.36
5.06
5.95
11.88
11.88
1.32
1.32
0.20
1.44
4.76
14.86
5.18
0.92
0.48
6.12
6.70
14.08
2.17
19.54
43.05
0.78
1.92
3.34
9.86
3.36
1.71
4.54
1.11
6.55
8.98
12.27
0.56
1.28
2.22
2.25
9.69
9.09
3.67
11.26
2.34
66.09
7.69
ii
0.31
1.26
4.15
2.16
0.58
0.70
7.53
7.53
0.33
0.33
0.09
0.68
0.63
1.37
0.86
0.33
0.19
2.24
1.64
5.77
0.72
1.73
2.59
0.56
0.58
0.74
1.63
0.21
0.53
0.38
3.37
0.95
2.40
2.66
0.09
0.39
0.27
0.65
1.04
3.44
0.08
5.35
0.54
2.12
0.87
Round 2
*
=
Oi
84399
84413
84422
84470
84463
84463
84482
84484
84437
84442
84408
84404
84412
84474
84406
84393
84444
84424
84396
84425
84401
84456
84477
84411
84418
84418
84467
84420
84409
84394
84489
84528
84430
84402
84445
84448
84433
84446
84475
84469
84416
84407
84419
84472
84415
g
o.
1
32.70
18.40
37.40
38.00
34.70
34.70
39.00
40.70
60.10
40.70
15.90
14.50
17.80
35.90
20.90
37.90
25.00
41.30
39.10
43.90
30.10
55.40
39.40
18.40
31.40
31.40
37.20
30.40
17.90
39.20
34.90
31.40
46.70
29.40
24.10
24.70
48.30
23.60
36.80
37.60
28.20
23.90
34.10
40.00
28.40
?
^-^
43.4
47.0
38.5
42.9
62.5
62.5
70.1
56.8
47.0
59.6
45.3
43.0
44.8
67.1
36.0
70.6
32.6
41.5
65.5
39.3
41.3
44.1
59.8
43.9
33.5
33.5
55.0
39.4
43.5
69.1
63.0
24.0
56.0
39.2
33.4
38.9
57.4
35.8
65.2
43.0
36.0
32.5
30.8
40.9
33.7
Grav PM
(mg/mi)
2.82
140.91
18.68
332.68
101.18
101.18
14.10
8.66
2.08
2.53
16.91
19.94
3.09
63.87
62.64
2.48
18.07
13.91
10.49
28.28
4.75
37.30
74.32
83.29
23.32
17.05
4.54
21.09
15.40
133.10
23.64
20.31
3.24
22.75
27.54
30.30
43.59
138.65
3.84
151.32
4.29
91.37
27.03
s^,
si
0.25
1.88
1.50
16.18
0.25
0.25
1.11
1.05
0.30
0.30
0.38
0.58
0.56
1.08
0.79
0.34
0.31
0.24
0.30
2.23
0.34
1.46
1.50
0.53
0.24
0.24
1.62
0.25
0.50
0.31
0.67
0.61
0.63
1.02
0.24
0.44
0.28
0.76
1.61
1.39
0.19
2.90
0.45
4.28
0.33
el
6.72
34.24
16.91
212.79
7.56
7.56
12.85
12.37
2.59
2.63
0.86
5.84
9.62
10.66
9.47
3.19
1.20
4.04
8.74
16.13
4.57
25.72
58.74
5.42
3.92
3.92
17.69
5.16
8.38
5.25
3.14
8.85
16.22
17.42
2.18
6.22
3.62
5.18
31.43
15.30
6.60
24.18
6.90
59.49
8.13
ll
0.29
1.42
5.27
2.14
0.77
0.77
6.99
7.08
0.34
0.35
0.23
0.83
0.47
1.23
0.99
0.30
0.20
2.39
1.39
5.50
0.96
1.54
1.81
0.84
0.90
0.90
1.82
0.36
1.15
0.30
3.12
1.59
1.75
2.62
0.24
0.41
0.32
0.63
0.85
2.59
0.08
4.59
0.52
2.04
1.63
4-104
-------
Scatter Plot of Winter Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5 - Composite (Linear)
160
^ »
"E 140
£ 130
120
no
100
90
C\l go
^ 70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5 Emissions (mg/mile)
Figure 4-20. Winter vs. Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5 - Linear
Scatter Plot of Winter Gravknetric PM 2.5 vs. Summer Gravimetric PM 25 - Composite (Logarithmic)
1000
i
AAA A
0.1 1.0 ton 100.0
Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5 Emissions (mg/mile)
1000.0
Figure 4-21. Winter vs. Summer Gravimetric PM 2.5 - Logarithmic
4-105
-------
Scatter Plot of Winter HC vs. Summer HC - Composite (Linear)
1234
Summer HC Emissions (g/mile)
Figure 4-22. Winter vs. Summer HC - Linear
Scatter Plot of Winter HC vs. Summer HC - Composite (Logarithmic)
10.0 H
1.0
£
i
0.01
0.10 1.00
Summer HC Emissions (g/mlte)
/profl/KansasC*y/Fkxjnd2/reteet84ias 24JULD6 1324
10.00
Figure 4-23. Winter vs. Summer HC - Logarithmic
4-106
-------
Scatter Plot of Winter CO vs. Summer CO - Composite (Linear)
iS
8
10 20 30 40 50 60
Summer CO Emissions (g/mlle)
/pro|1/Kansa8Cly/Fkxjnd2/reteete£as 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-24. Winter vs. Summer CO - Linear
70
Scatter Plot of Winter CO vs. Summer CO - Composite (Logarithmic)
1000
100
£
8
i
w
0.1
W 10.0
Summer CO Emissions (g/mlle)
/pn#/KansasCly/Round2/reteet8.8as 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-25. Winter vs. Summer CO - Logarithmic
4-107
-------
Scatter Plot of Winter NOx vs. Summer NOx - Composite (Linear)
23456
Summer NOx Emissions (g/mile)
Figure 4-26. Winter vs. Summer NOx - Linear
Scatter Plot of Winter NOx vs. Summer NOx - Composite (Logarithmic)
10.0 H
1.0
0.01
0.10 1.00
Summer NOx Emissions (g/mlle)
/profl/KansasC*y/Fkxjnd2/reteet84ias 24JULD6 1324
10.00
Figure 4-27. Winter vs. Summer NOx - Logarithmic
4-108
-------
Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Average Temperature - Composite (Linear)
160
150
14°
130
"
no
100
90
80
CM 70
n n
n n
n
n
n
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Average Temperature (degrees F)
/pro|1/KansasCly/Ro«jnda/retBslBias 24JUL06 1324
80 90
Figure 4-28. Gravimetric PM 2.5 vs. Average Temperature
HC vs. Average Temperature - Composite (Linear)
a
203040506070 80 90
Average Temperature (degrees F)
/pip|1/KanKHCty/Roiind2ABlBsbjas 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-29. HC vs. Average Temperature
4-109
-------
.XE
£
8
20
CO vs. Average Temperature - Composite (Linear)
2030
50607080
90 100
Average Temperature (degrees F)
Figure 4-30. CO vs. Average Temperature
NOx vs. Average Temperature - Composite (Linear)
D
D
DD
off
203040506070 80 90 100
Average Temperature (degrees F)
/pro|1/KansasCay/RourKd2/retestBias 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-31. NOx vs. Average Temperature
4-110
-------
4.4.5 Review of In-Round Duplicate Test Results
4.4.5.1 Round 1 Duplicate Testing
Sixteen vehicles were subject to duplicate testing in Round 1. One of these vehicles was
tested three times, for a total of eighteen duplicate test pairs. Table 4-22 presents test run
numbers, test conditions, and composite emissions for the Round 1 duplicate testing. Figures 4-
32 through 4-39 present linear and logarithmic plots comparing composite gravimetric PM2 5,
HC, CO, and NOx across the first and second tests, with 1:1 lines for reference. Appendices G
and H contains by-phase plots for all pollutants of interest.
4-111
-------
Table 4-22. Round 1 Duplicate Testing Composite Emissions
Duplicate #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Run#
84258
84111
84166
84110
84060
84198
84104
84132
84175
84332
84151
84120
84388
84388
84388
84321
84345
84308
First Test
Temp
(F)
70.8
88.4
71.5
84.7
90.3
65.8
78.1
80.3
70.1
76.8
69.4
93.6
59.1
59.1
59.1
80.5
74.1
77.4
RH
(%)
1.5
51.6
39.2
56.8
63.8
63.2
55.7
38.3
47.8
39.7
46.8
44.4
4.8
4.8
4.8
33.3
42.5
42.3
Grav PM
(mg/mi)
4.798
4.068
0.604
10.006
0.994
2.072
1.556
4.334
3.644
2.24
1.452
5.467
1.366
0.327
3.914
HC
(g/mi)
0.29
0.172
0.34
0.195
0.097
0.421
0.185
1.09
1.261
0.155
0.094
0.991
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.197
0.183
0.266
CO
(g/mi)
4.248
2.342
7.136
5.063
1.013
4.931
2.168
11.5
7.782
1.922
3.361
27.563
0.037
0.037
0.037
0.972
1.954
8.071
NOx
(g/mi)
1.498
0.91
1.25
0.585
0.937
0.585
0.719
2.488
1.713
0.577
0.208
1.292
0.056
0.056
0.056
0.482
0.654
2.044
Run
#
84262
84116
84169
84115
84062
84200
84109
84137
84180
84341
84156
84123
84389
84390
84391
84328
84350
84312
Second Test
Temp
(F)
71.8
87.6
70.7
84
83.9
65.2
83
76.9
74.6
76
65.4
85.1
60.2
60.9
63.2
82
70.7
74.3
RH
(%)
50.2
49.5
44
57.1
80.3
68.8
59.1
34.9
44.4
54.3
59.4
56.2
5.4
6.8
7.9
40.7
49.5
61.1
Grav PM
(mg/mi)
3.321
1.787
0.043
7.597
1.236
3.687
1.069
4.413
9.257
7.647
2.022
3.428
0.391
0.444
0.958
HC
(g/mi)
0.437
0.201
0.269
0.234
0.066
0.481
0.173
1.049
1.338
0.189
0.107
0.918
0.001
0.001
0.017
0.207
0.175
0.219
CO
(g/mi)
8.355
2.435
4.825
5.948
0.638
6.285
1.965
10.222
9.151
3.335
4.69
26.13
0.01
0.003
0.101
0.943
2.048
7.792
NOx
(g/mi)
1.576
0.916
1.288
0.704
0.93
0.663
0.751
2.394
2.017
0.744
0.223
1.047
0.001
0
0.471
0.661
2.006
4-112
-------
Scatter Plot of Fret vs. Second Gravimetric PM 2.5 Test - Composite (Linear)
23456789
Second Test Gravimetric PM 2.5 Emissions (mg/mile)
A>ict1/KaBa>Cly/Rouid2And1_dupelBiluas 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-32. First vs. Second Round 1 Gravimetric PM 2.5 Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second Gravimetric PM 2.5 Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
0.1
0.10 1.00 10.00
Second Test Gravimetric PM 2.5 Emissions (mg/mile)
/pnjI/KansaaCly/RaundZAndl.dupeleal&sas 24JUL36 1334
Figure 4-33. First vs. Second Round 1 Gravimetric PM 2.5 Tests - Logarithmic
4-113
-------
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second HC Test - Composite (Linear)
0.0 0.1 02 03 0.4 05 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 13 1
Second Test HC Emissions (g/mile)
/picJ1/Kai8arfty/Rouid2And1_dupelBiluaB 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-34. First vs. Second Round 1 HC Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second HC Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
1.000
0.100
0.001
0.0010
0.0100 0.1000
Second Test HC Emissions (g/mile)
/pnjI/KansaaCly/Raundaindl.dupeleal&sas 24JUL36 1*24
Figure 4-35. First vs. Second Round 1 HC Tests - Logarithmic
4-114
-------
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second CO Test - Composite (Linear)
30
8
10 20
Second Test CO Emissions (g/mile)
/picJ1/Kai8arfty/Rouid2And1_dupelBiluaB 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-36. First vs. Second Round 1 CO Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second CO Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
10.00
1.00
8
I
i
0.01
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000
Second Test CO Emissions (g/mile)
/pnjI/KansaaCly/RaundZAndl.dupeleal&sas 24JUU36 1324
Figure 4-37. First vs. Second Round 1 CO Tests - Logarithmic
4-115
-------
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second NQx Test - Composite (Linear)
i 2
Second Test NOx Emissions (g/mile)
/picJ1/Kai8arfty/Rouid2And1_dupelBiluaB 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-38. First vs. Second Round 1 NOx Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second NOx Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
0.10
I
0.01
0.00010 0.00100 0.01000 0.10000
Second Test NOx Emissions (g/mile)
/pnjI/KansaaCly/RaundZAndl.dupeleal&sas 24JUU36 1324
Figure 4-39. First vs. Second Round 1 NOx Tests - Logarithmic
4-116
-------
4.4.5.2 Round2 Duplicate Testing
Ten vehicles were subject to duplicate testing in Round 2. Table 4-23 presents test run
numbers, test conditions, and composite emission results for the Round 2 duplicate testing.
Figures 4-40 through 4-47 present linear and logarithmic plots comparing composite gravimetric
PM2.5, HC, CO, and NOx across the first and second tests, with 1:1 lines for reference.
Appendices G and H contains by-phase plots for all pollutants of interest.
4-117
-------
Table 4-23. Round 2 Duplicate Testing Composite Emissions
Duplicate #
1
2
o
J
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
First Test
Run#
84537
84482
84437
84690
84465
84627
84675
84541
84449
84485
Temp
(F)
40.900
39.000
60.100
55.200
37.900
47.000
52.900
49.800
25.800
38.900
RH
(%)
63.8
70.1
47.0
38.3
56.0
34.9
28.9
68.3
39.0
59.2
Grav PM
(mg/mi)
3.178
14.104
2.078
2.005
188.706
232.116
4.114
6.332
10.153
20.047
HC
(g/mi)
0.304
1.109
0.299
0.684
0.227
14.917
0.342
0.705
0.441
1.099
CO
(g/mi)
4.495
12.847
2.587
9.336
3.337
69.159
4.899
13.630
7.926
25.170
NOx
(g/mi)
0.740
6.988
0.340
1.268
0.920
3.776
2.001
1.059
1.136
1.027
Second Test
Run
#
84543
84484
84442
84695
84468
84632
84681
84542
84451
84490
Temp
(F)
49.500
40.700
40.700
42.400
36.600
45.000
41.300
44.600
37.600
36.900
RH
(%)
52.5
56.8
59.6
67.6
46.3
30.4
68.7
61.3
61.3
55.0
Grav PM
(mg/mi)
3.982
8.658
2.535
2.119
5.223
99.412
4.908
4.620
3.842
HC
(g/mi)
0.237
1.046
0.300
0.632
0.234
15.235
0.308
0.746
0.399
0.974
CO
(g/mi)
4.072
12.375
2.630
7.410
3.544
88.783
4.098
14.926
7.127
25.026
NOx
(g/mi)
0.759
7.077
0.354
1.206
0.781
3.696
2.100
1.090
1.250
1.023
4-118
-------
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second Gravimetric PM 2.5 Test - Composite (Linear)
300
£
3
200
0 100 200 300
Second Test Gravimetric PM 2.5 Emissions (mg/rnile)
/preJ1/KanBMdl»/Round2And2_dupetE8l»aa8 24JULD6 1324
Figure 4-40. First vs. Second Round 2 Gravimetric PM 2.5 Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second Gravimetric PM 25 Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
1000
a
Q_
10
i
10 100
Second Test Gravimetric PM 2.5 Emissions (mg/rnile)
/pro)1/KaisasCly/Round2/md2_dupete8teias 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-41. First vs. Second Round 2 Gravimetric PM 2.5 Tests - Logarithmic
4-119
-------
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second HC Test - Composite (Linear)
S a
•
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Second Test HC Emissions (g/mile)
/pro)1/KaisasCly/Round2/md2_dupete8teias 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-42. First vs. Second Round 2 HC Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second HC Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
1JO
0.1
1.0 10.0
Second Test HC Emissions (g/mile)
/preJ1/KanBaeCII»/Rcund2And2_dupetE8l»Ba8 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-43. First vs. Second Round 2 HC Tests - Logarithmic
4-120
-------
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second CO Test - Composite (Linear)
8
20
20 30 40 SO 60 70
Second Test CO Emissions (g/mile)
/pro)1/KaisasCly/Round2/md2_dupete8teias 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-44. First vs. Second Round 2 CO Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second CO Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
10
8
Second Test CO Emissions (g/mile)
/preJ1/KanBaeCII»/Rcund2And2_dupetE8l»Ba8 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-45. First vs. Second Round 2 CO Tests - Logarithmic
4-121
-------
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second NQx Test - Composite (Linear)
23456
Second Test NOx Emissions (g/mile)
/pro)1/KaisasCly/Round2/md2_dupete8teias 24JUL06 1324
Figure 4-46. First vs. Second Round 2 NOx Tests - Linear
Scatter Plot of First vs. Second NOx Test - Composite (Logarithmic)
1.0
8
i
0.1
Second Test NOx Emissions (g/mile)
/preJ1/KanBaeCII»/Rcundatnd?.dupetE8l»Ba8 24JULD6 1324
Figure 4-47. First vs. Second Round 2 NOx Tests - Logarithmic
4-122
-------
Table 4-24 shows a statistical analysis on the duplicate measurements conducted during
Round 1 and Round 2. A paired t-test is a sensitive test for evaluating repeat measurements.
The table shows that random duplicate measurements were not significantly different. The
relative humidity measurements were significantly different in Round 1 for the duplicates, but
this does not appear to influence the NOx or other measurements in any meaningful way. We
have also included the largest mean difference in the measurements in the far right column of the
table. This column shows the threshold value for the mean difference beyond which the value
would be called significant at the 95% confidence level for the number of paired measurements
made. As shown, all the mean values for all the emissions and temperatures are well below this
threshold. Even the relative humidity in Round 2 was below this value and hence not
significantly different.
Table 4-24. Paired t-test Results for In-Round Duplicates
Round 1
Variable
PMdiff
HCdiff
COdiff
NXdiff
tempdiff
rhdiff
Round 2
Variable
PMdiff
HCdiff
COdiff
NXdiff
tempdiff
rhdiff
Units
mg/mi
g/mi
g/mi
g/mi
deg. F
%
Units
mg/mi
g/mi
g/mi
g/mi
deg. F
%
TV
15
18
18
17
18
18
TV
9
10
10
10
10
10
Mean
0.03
0.01
0.26
0.02
-0.76
8.24
Mean
-38.16
0.00
1.66
0.01
-3.22
5.40
Std Error
0.66
0.01
0.33
0.03
0.85
2.86
Std Error
23.12
0.04
2.01
0.03
3.03
6.05
t Value
0.05
0.50
0.80
0.70
-0.88
2.88
t Value
-1.65
-0.04
0.82
0.32
-1.06
0.89
Pr > \t\
0.96
0.62
0.43
0.49
0.39
0.01
Pr> t
0.14
0.97
0.43
0.76
0.31
0.40
tfor 95%
conf
2.15
2.11
2.11
2.12
2.11
2.11
tfor 95%
conf
2.31
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
Mean value needed
for 95 % conf in diff
1.41
0.03
0.69
0.06
1.80
6.03
Mean value needed
for 95 % conf in diff
53.32
0.09
4.55
0.06
6.84
13.68
4-123
-------
4.4.6 Review of Miscellaneous Regulated Pollutant Emission Trends
Figures 4-48 through 4-55 present composite PM2 5, HC, CO, and NOX measurements
from the dynamometer classified by vehicle type and model year in both linear and log scale. All
emissions show a negative relationship with model year, and vehicle type does not seem to have
any influence on emission values. Plots of PM2.5, HC, CO, and NOX measurements from the
dynamometer classified by vehicle type and model year for particular Phases are located in
Appendices G and H (Note that the letters A through I present in the axis labels in the figures
below are in place to sort the data appropriately for ease of reading; they serve no other purpose.)
Figures 4-56 through 4-59 present scatter plots of composite PM2.5 vs. NOX
measurements from the dynamometer classified by vehicle type and model year in both linear
and log scale. All plots show a positive relationship between PM2.5 emissions and NOX
emissions, and the newest model year group shows the lowest amount of emissions. In these
figures, Phase 1 emissions are depicted in red, phase 2 emissions in green, and phase 3 emissions
in brown. Scatter plots of PM2 5 against HC and CO measurements from the dynamometer can
be found in Appendices G and H.
Figures 4-60 through 4-63 present plots of composite PM2.5 emissions as a function of
model year classified by vehicle type in both linear and log scale. All plots show lower emissions
when the model year is newer. The dispersion within the model for each plot shows that newer
model years have less variation than older ones. Plots of HC, CO and NOX measurements from
the dynamometer as a function of model year can be found in Appendices G and H.
Figures 4-64 through 4-71 present overlay plots of composite and Phase 1 PM2.5, HC,
CO, and NOX emissions as a function of odometer in both linear and log scale. These plots reveal
higher emissions under cold start conditions, as expected. Odometer readings do not seem to
have a strong influence on emission levels. It should be noted that all odometer values shown in
Figures 4-64 through 4-71 have not been corrected for odometer "turnover". For example, the
mileage for a vehicle with a 5-digit odometer and 103,000 miles would be shown in these plots
as 3,000 miles. Figures 4-72 through 4-79 present overlay plots of the percent projected-fleet
distribution of composite PM2.5, HC, CO, and NOX emissions. A solid line represents cumulative
percent projected-fleet distribution, while a dashed line represents percent projected-fleet
distribution. The PM2 5 distribution shows that more then 95% of the fleet has PM2 5 emission
rates lower than 80 mg/mile. The reference point is the Tier 1 vehicle certification standard for
PM emissions (approximately model years 1996 - 2003).
For Round 1, 267 LA92 tests were performed, excluding correlation vehicle tests. Using
both the Kansas City fleet distribution for each stratum and the actual Round 1 stratum
distribution, Kansas City fleet simulation can be achieved as shown in Table 4-25. This
simulation is applied here for QA/QC purposes only and not for modeling purposes. It provides
some insight to the effectiveness of the recruitment process to acquire vehicles that emit high PM
emissions.
4-124
-------
Composite (Log Scale)
B [xHuBk-rae-Newer EQv-ne nei RQr-iea-ieeo
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
nei aiMc-teei-mo cituk-ieai-iBec uiuK-nse-Newcr
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
Figure 4-48. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-125
-------
.XE
£
£
Composite (Log Scale)
D.1tu*-1B96-Newcr EAv-ne 1081
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
I I
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Figure 4-49. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-126
-------
Composite (Log Scale)
8
3
A.iu*-Fie ism aitudt-KBi-weo ciudc-m-ia* DiMc-iBss-Newer Efiw-ne tsei FC*-ieei-iseo
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
8
I I
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Figure 4-50. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-127
-------
Composite (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
A.iwk-ne wei aiwk-tsei-iaeo
Cfflufc-ieei-ien onuJr-iaae-ifeMr Ec»-Pie IBM
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Figure 4-51. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-128
-------
Composite (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
GUidr-iBsi-m muK-nse-Newer EOv-ne ieei ECer-nn-i
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
Figure 4-52. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-129
-------
.XE
£
i
Composite (Log Scale)
D.itu*-iB96-Newcr EAv-ne Wei
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
C.Thj*-iBei-ieeB aiudt-isse-MMer EOr-ne IBM
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Figure 4-53. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-130
-------
8
3
8
Composite (Log Scale)
C.ludc-1391-IB!* D.1tu*-1B96-Newcr EAv-ne 1081
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
J i
I CUidc-nee-Newer EOv-Pie 1BSI ECer-ttBI-1
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Figure 4-54. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-131
-------
Composite (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Composite (Linear Scale)
A.iwk-ne wei aiwk-tsei-iaeo cituk-ieei-ien onuJr-iaae-ifeMr E&r-Pie IBM ECv-nn-neo OA*-ieei-isw
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
/tfcUKmnCWftoWKaidDH-BHMi KHJU6 9OB
Figure 4-55. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Class-Year Bin
4-132
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 us Composite NOx (Log Scale)- CAR
Log NOx Emission (g/mile)
O O ECnr-19ei-19BO A A A OC^-199I-19BK * * *
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite NOx (Linear Scale)- CAR
NOx Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-56. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s vs. NOx by Vehicle Type-Year
4-133
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite NOx (Log Scale)- TRUCK
Log NOx Emission (g/mile)
* D D D A.1MC-RB 19BI O O O aiUOk-19ei-1990 A A A GllU*-1991-199B * * *
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite NOx (Linear Scale)- TRUCK
NOx Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-57. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s vs. NOx by Vehicle Type-Year
4-134
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 us Composite NOx (Log Scale)- CAR
DD
I A
C
Log NOx Emission (g/mile)
O O ECnr-19ei-19BO A A A OC^-199I-19BK * * *
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite NOx (Linear Scale)- CAR
D D
NOx Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-58. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s vs. NOx by Vehicle Type-Year
4-135
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite NOx (Log Scale)- TRUCK
Log NOx Emission (g/mile)
* D D D A.1MC-RB 19BI O O O aiUOk-19ei-1990 A A A C1lU*-1991-198B * * * EXHUOk-lttB-Nmtf
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite NOx (Linear Scale)- TRUCK
90,00 o -o
NOx Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-59. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s vs. NOx by Vehicle Type-Year
4-136
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
10B2 19B9 19B4 1086 1SBB 1087 1988 19B9 199D 1991 1002 1091 IBM 1905 1996 1907 1098 199B 2000 2001 2002 200S 2004 2005 2006
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
1987 19881980199019911992199190419061096 1997 19BB«00200aSOOI2DQ22DaaaDW;
Model Year
Figure 4-60. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Model Year
4-137
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
wreierai9Boigmieni9a 1964 IBM iB8BiBeri9eei9B9igeoie9ii9aiHoiB94i9esi96BOT
Model Year
3 O C
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
8004 2KB BOOS
Model Year
Figure 4-61. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Model Year
4-138
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
Model Year
Figure 4-62. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Model Year
4-139
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
Model Year
Figure 4-63. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Model Year
4-140
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
040
°°
3° **°* *% # * °0 O ^O
°** ** * 1**!^*^* %»JF O 8j
%S*o rf* &^^0 C,*°0o°-'-4 1
d* *J*^^S % %^°^ °oO*o c
*ooO »% o°|00o
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Odometer (Miles)
• * ft * Bagl-CctiflM
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Linear Scale)
* *
* 4
* **
Odometer (Miles)
Figure 4-65. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Odometer Mileage
4-142
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
8
ft
n *
***
&
to *
a dm nn S D n
n ^^c
Odometer (Miles)
D D D Oonpc«toW» * * -fr Bag1-C*«at
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Linear Scale)
8
Odometer (Miles)
Figure 4-66. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Odometer Mileage
4-143
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
* ft A
ft * ft*
ft A 8
Ift^* **% $$*.
1*^ ZV7 ir'r
if
Odometer (Miles)
A A A GonpofeWte 4^4 Bagl-CcUflM
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Linear Scale)
& *fti* * ^ *^
** At4^"
* ^!ifcl**** *
Odometer (Miles)
Figure 4-67. Round 1 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Odometer Mileage
4-144
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
# at
~
ft * of"
» o
o
O ft
Odometer (Miles)
ft ft ft Bagl-CctiflM
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Linear Scale)
Odometer (Miles)
Figure 4-68. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of PM2.s Emissions by Odometer Mileage
4-145
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
A
* *
Odometer (Miles)
* ft * Bagl-CcUflM
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Linear Scale)
* "•
i ft *ft * £
lft *ft 4^
ft * * *v *
U«
Odometer (Miles)
Figure 4-69. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of HC Emissions by Odometer Mileage
4-146
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
4 *D ***
*° **D*
*
8
n ° "B
#* *
.
**
ft*
D
D
cP
n
n n
Odometer (Miles)
D D D Oonpc«toW» * & * Bag1-C*«at
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Linear Scale)
8
ft *
4 ft *
ft ft
* * ft *
nftD * nt_ * n ,
Dn ^=m ffi nmu [
Odometer (Miles)
Figure 4-70. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of CO Emissions by Odometer Mileage
4-147
-------
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Odometer (Miles)
D4OGUP: A A A GonpafeWte ft & ft Bagl-CctiflM
Emissions as a Function of Odometers for Simulated Reel Distribution (Linear Scale)
Odometer (Miles)
ft ft Bagl-Ccua
Figure 4-71. Round 2 Log/Linear Plots of NOx Emissions by Odometer Mileage
4-148
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log Gravimetric PM2.5 Emission (mg/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
Gravimetric PM2.5 Emission (mg/mile)
Figure 4-72. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.5
4-149
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Fleet Distribution (Log Scale)
Log HC Emission (g/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
HC Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-73. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite HC
4-150
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log CO Emission (g/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
CO Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-74. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite CO
4-151
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log NOx Emission (g/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
NQx Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-75. Round 1 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite NO*
4-152
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log Gravimetric PM2.5 Emission (mg/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
no 140 «o wo
Gravimetric PM2.5 Emission (mg/mile)
Figure 4-76. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite PM2.5
4-153
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log HC Emission (g/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
HC Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-77. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite HC
4-154
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log CO Emission (g/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
CO Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-78. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite CO
4-155
-------
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Reel Distribution (Log Scale)
Log NOx Emission (g/mile)
Cumulative Plot of Emission by Simulated Feet Distribution (Linear Scale)
NOx Emission (g/mile)
Figure 4-79. Round 2 Plots of % Projected-Fleet Distribution of Composite NOX
4-156
-------
Table 4-25. Round 1 Vehicle Distribution by Vehicle Type and Model Year Group
Stratum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Year of
Make
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996 up
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996 up
VEHTYPE
TRUCK
TRUCK
TRUCK
TRUCK
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
KC
DMV
Vehicle
%
1.20%
3.70%
4.40%
11.60%
2.20%
10.70%
18.00%
48.20%
100%
Project
Goals
30
50
50
75
30
100
65
80
480
Goal of
Round 1
16
26
26
39
16
51
34
42
250
Round 1
Actual
Tested
2
14
18
36
6
48
45
98
267
Round 1 and Its
Duplication for
Simulating of KC
Fleet Distribution"
5(3)
17(3)
20(2)
52(16)
10(4)
48(0)
81(36)
216(118)
449(182)
** Number in parenthesis presents the duplicated records from that specific bin.
During Round 2, 291 LA92 tests were performed, excluding the 12 control vehicle tests.
Using both the Kansas City fleet distribution for each stratum and the actual Round 2 stratum
distribution, Kansas City fleet simulation can be achieved as shown in Table 4-26. Again, this
simulation is applied here for QA/QC purposes only, not for modeling purposes.
Table 4-26. Round 2 Vehicle Distribution by Vehicle Type and Model Year Group
Stratum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Year of
Make
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996 up
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996 up
VEHTYPE
TRUCK
TRUCK
TRUCK
TRUCK
CAR
CAR
CAR
CAR
KC
DMV
Vehicle
%
1.20%
3.70%
4.40%
11.60%
2.20%
10.70%
18.00%
48.20%
100%
Project
Goals
30
50
50
75
30
100
65
80
480
Goal of
Round 2
10
37
30
47
15
34
36
27
236
Round 2
Actual
Tested
9
29
31
50
14
36
37
29
235
Round 2 and Its
Duplication for
Simulating of KC
Fleet Distribution "
7(-2)
21(-8)
16(-15)
20(-30)
12(-2)
36(0)
36(-l)
72(43)
220(-15)
Number in parenthesis presents the duplicated records from that specific bin.
4-157
-------
4.5 Evaluation of Exhaust PM2.s Mass Measurements
DRI installed and operated a suite of instruments to provide continuous PM data during
the Kansas City Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicle Emission Characterization Study. The instruments
provided by EPA and operated by DRI included a Booker Systems Model RPM-101 Quartz
Crystal Microbalance (QCM) manufactured by Sensor's, Inc. and a MIE, Inc. DataRAM4
nephelometer for PM mass. In addition, DRI operated a photoacoustic instrument for
determination of BC mass concentrations (Arnott, Zielinska et al. 2004) and a TSI DustTrak.
This section compares the continuous PM data to the corresponding time-integrated gravimetric
mass data. Data from the real-time sensors were also used to examine PM emission rates under
varying vehicle operating conditions and to monitor the blank levels in the dynamometer dilution
tunnel during the purge cycle prior to each vehicle test.
4.5.1 Introduction
One objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the Sensor's Inc. QCM as a
component of a portable emission monitor. Although the QCM is a highly sensitive measure of
cumulative mass, it has a limited dynamic range which requires adjustable dilution rates. In
actual application, the dilution ratios would be continually adjusted as required. The
dynamometer testing provided an opportunity to evaluate the QCM with other measurement
methods under controlled conditions for a large range of emission rates.
Motor vehicle manufacturers have a long history of interest in measurement of BC
emissions from vehicles with use of the photoacoustic method (Roessler 1984). A more recent
study evaluated methods for continuous measurement of PM from light duty diesel vehicles
tested on a dynamometer (Moosmiiller, Arnott et al. 2001a; Moosmiiller, Arnott et al. 2001b).
The key findings of this work were that the time-averaged tapered-element oscillating
microbalance (TEOM) data showed close correlation with PM2.s measurements using Teflon
filters. The TEOM had considerably more noise than the DustTrak nephelometer also used for
PM2 5 measurement, though the DustTrak showed variable correlation with Teflon filter mass
with the key dependence related to the amount of organic carbon in the exhaust and very likely,
the change in particle size with vehicle model year. Photoacoustic (PA) measurements of BC
were found to correlate well with elemental carbon measurements accomplished thermal optical
reflectance analysis using the IMPROVE protocol (Chow, Watson et al. 1993) (TOR-
IMPROVE) for the definitions of the various OC and EC stages as well as the correction for
optical pyrolysis. An efficiency factor was obtained for converting aerosol light absorption
measurements by the photoacoustic method to BC such that for light duty diesel vehicles, BC =
EC. The instrument suite of TSI DustTrak and Thermo Electron Corporation DataRAM4
nephelometers for total PM, and DRI photoacoustic instrument for BC mass concentration were
deployed during the study reported on here. DRI also was responsible for operation of the quartz
crystal microbalance, though responsibility for final data analysis and reduction lies with the
EPA.
4.5.2 Measurement Methods
DRI installed and operated a suite of instruments including the Photo-Acoustic BC
Analyzer, QCM, TSI DustTrak, DataRAM4, and Filter Sample Holders to provide continuous
4-158
-------
PM analysis and to collect batch samples of particle and gaseous exhaust components for later
analysis in accordance with the methods and procedures specified in DRI's QAPP (June 23,
2004). These instruments collected sample air from the dynamometer dilution system via two
isokinetic probes, provided by BKI and EPA, inserted within 5 cm of the center-line of the CVS
dilution tunnel prior to a 90-degree bend in the dilution tunnel. Figure 2-4 illustrates the sample
train as it was installed during the tests. Heated conductive lines carried air from the probes to
the continuous instruments. Insulated copper tubing was used to carry sample air to the time-
integrated samplers.
4.5.2.1 Gravimetric Mass Measurements
Unexposed and exposed Teflon-membrane filters were equilibrated at a temperature of
20 ± 5 °C and a relative humidity of 30 ± 5% for a minimum of 24 hours prior to weighing.
Weighing was performed on a Sartorius SE2 electro microbalance with ± 0.0001 mg sensitivity.
The charge on each filter is neutralized by exposure to a polonium source for 30 seconds prior to
the filter being placed on the balance pan. The balance is calibrated with a 20 mg Class M weight
and the tare is set prior to weighing each batch of filters. After every 10 filters are weighed, the
calibration and tare are re-checked. If the results of these performance tests deviate from
specifications by more than ± 5 mg, the balance is re-calibrated. If the difference exceeds ±15
mg, the balance is recalibrated and the previous 10 samples are re-weighed. At least 30% of the
weights are checked by an independent technician and samples are re-weighed if these check-
weights do not agree with the original weights within ± 0.015 mg. Pre- and post-weights, check
weights, and re-weights (if required) are recorded on data sheets as well as being directly entered
into a data base via an RS232 connection. All PM2 5 and PMi0 Teflon filters were analyzed for
mass and all weights entered by filter number into the DRI aerosol data base.
4.5.2.2 Continuous PM Measurements
The Quartz Crystal Monitor has had extensive use in monitoring atmospheric aerosol
(Daley and Lundgren, 1975). More recently this monitoring concept has been adapted for use in
measuring particulate emissions in real-time from vehicles (Dickens and Booker, 1998, Booker,
2001). For the Kansas City Project, a sampling system and QCM optimized for real-time vehicle
parti culate mass emissions were integrated in a cart at Sensors, Inc. A general description of the
cart components and their use in the KC vehicle sampling system is found in Section 2.3.1.
Figure 4-80 provides a schematic of the QCM sensors used in the cart system. Sample
air derived trough the FCS valve system is drawn through the QCM by a flow controlled sample
pump at a nominal rate of 11pm. Sample air is passed through a high voltage corona where
charge is deposited on the sample air particulates. These are then precipitated on a metal clad
quartz piezoelectric crystal where they are collected. The crystal is excited to vibrate at its
resonant frequency that is a function of collected mass. The greater the mass, the lower the
resonant frequency. The frequency to mass relationship is:
d(-Af)/d(Am/A) = 2f2/5f = S
4-159
-------
where/is the crystal resonant frequency, /d/the change in frequency due to a change in mass per
unit area on the crystal Am/A, Sq is the density of the quartz, c is the shear wave velocity
perpendicular to the crystal surface and S is the sensitivity. The mass sensitivity for the QCM is
typically 150 Hz/ug. Using the change in frequency, deposited mass can be determined in real-
time and, with the measured sample flow, the measured mass concentration can be determined.
HIGH VOLTAGE
AEROSOL
FLOW
COLLECTED
PARTICLES
ELECTROSTATIC
CHARGING AND
PRECIPITATION
PIEZOELECTRIC CRYSTAL
Figure 4-80. Schematic of the QCM.
The Kansas City Project consisted of two Rounds of measurements. For Round 1, 355
separate tests were conducted during which the QCM was used to measure vehicle particulate
emissions. For Round 2, 384 separate tests were conducted. Figure 4-81 depicts an example
trace of particulate mass collected by the QCM during one of these tests. The trace illustrates the
three parts of each test: Phase 1, Phase 2, Hot Soak, and Phase 3. The procedures used in
obtaining each part of this trace are indicated on the figure by letters and described below:
A. The quartz crystal is removed from the QCM and cleaned using ethanol. The
crystal is then placed back in the QCM. The operator initiates a recording cycle
and filtered air is supplied to the QCM through the FCS valve unit. During this
period the excess moisture evaporates and the crystal temperature equilibrates.
Usually a period of 15 min. is required for complete drying and equilibration.
B. Filtered sample air from the CVS is supplied to the QCM through the FCS valve
unit. Quite often not enough time was permitted to remove moisture and permit
the crystal to reach thermal equilibrium so the settling of the mass trace was not
4-160
-------
complete before the test was started. To correct for this, the following functional
form is fitted to the trace of part B during data reduction and extrapolated values
are used to correct QCM mass in part C, Phase 1 and Phase 2:
Correction Mass = a (Time)2 + b (Time)
C. During Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the test, sample air from the CVA is supplied to
the QCM through the PCS. Under computer control, the cart operator has the
option of providing diluted or undiluted sample air to the QCM.
D. Part D of the trace is the Hot Soak. Here the same functional form is used to fit
the mass trace. The result is then used to correct QCM mass trace in part E, Phase
O
E. This is the mass trace for Phase 3. The same level of dilution is used here as that
for Phase 1 and Phase 2.
F. Filtered sample air from the CVS is again supplied to the QCM through the FCS
valve unit.
G. During this part of the test, the FCS unit switches filtered ambient air to the QCM
in preparation for the next test.
4-161
-------
Volatile particles still evaporating
at the end of Phase 1.
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Time, sec.
Figure 4-81. Example mass trace from the QCM analyzer.
Note that the trace shows definite loss of mass from the QCM due to loss of volatile
particle constituents. This is as much as 8% from the particulate collected during Phases 1 and 2.
During each test, the Computer Control/Data Acquisition System records several
parameters from the QCM Cart system. These are recorded in a data file and are listed for
Round 1 in Table 4-27. During Round 1, dew point was recorded by the Viasala in a separate
file.
4-162
-------
Table 4-27. Parameters Recorded by the QCM System Computer Control/Data
Acquisition System During Round 1 Tests.
Parameter
Date
Start Time
Time
Mass
QCM Flow
Corona Current
StDEV Corona Current
HV Volt
StDev HV Volts
Raw Cone.
Cone.
Crystal Holder Temp.
Unit
mm/dd/yyyy
hr:min:sec
sec.
H9
Ipm
HA
HA
kV
kV
mg/m
mg/m
°C
Parameter
Inlet Temp.
Block Temp.
Ref Crystal Temp.
Baseline Logic (opt.)
Tare Freq
Frequency
Pressure zone 4
Pressure zone 5
Time
MPS Major Flow
MPS Minor Flow
MPS Needle Flow
Unit
°C
°C
°c
num.
Hz
Hz
psi
psi
sec.
Ipm
Ipm
cc/sec.
Parameter
Diution Ratio
StDEV Dilution Ratio
Heated Line 1 (opt.)
Heated Line 2 (opy.)
Pressure Temp 1 (C)
Pressure Temp 2 (C)
Inlet Temp (C)
QCM Pump Status
QCM Corona Status
FCS Position
TTL 1 (from BKI)
TTL 2 (from BKI)
Unit
num.
num.
°C
°C
°c
°c
°c
on(l), off(0)
on(l), off(0)
num.
mv
mv
Raw Cone, and Cone, are nominal concentrations using the QCM flow and mass results.
The other parameters are used to monitor internal QCM operation and provide information
during instrument trouble-shooting. During Round 2, additional parameters were recorded.
These are summarized in Table 4-28. Added to the parameter list are the relative humidity (RH)
and the RH temperature. For both Rounds 1 and 2 the QCM recorded data with a time resolution
of 1.5 sec.
4-163
-------
Table 4-28. Parameters Recorded by the QCM System Computer Control/Data
Acquisition System During Round 2 Tests.
Parameter
Date
Start Time
Time
Mass
QCM Flow
Corona Current
StDEV Corona Current
HV Volt
StDev HV Volts
Raw Cone
Cone
Crystal Holder Temp.
Inlet Temp.
Unit
mm/dd/yyyy
hr:min:sec
sec.
H9
Ipm
HA
MA
kV
kV
mg/m
mg/m
°C
°C
Parameter
Block Temp.
Ref. Crystal Temp.
Baseline Logic (opt.)
Tare Freq
Frequency
Pressure Zone 4
Pressure Zone 5
RH
RH Temp
TTL1
TTL2
QCM PUMP Status
QCM Corona
Unit
°C
°C
num.
Hz
Hz
psi
psi
%
°C
mv
mv
on(l), off(0)
on(l), off(0)
Parameter
FCS Position
Time
MPS Major Flow
MPS Minor Flow
MPS Needle Flow
Diution Ratio
StDEV Dilution Ratio
Heated Line 1(opt.)
Heated Line 2 (opt.)
Pressure Temp. 1
Pressure Temp. 2
Inlet Temp.
Unit
num.
sec.
Ipm
Ipm
cc/sec.
num.
num.
°C
°C
°c
°c
°c
The Photo-Acoustic BC Analyzer, TSI DustTrak, DataRAM4, and Filter Sample Holder
part of this instrument suite was previously evaluated in an earlier study of the emissions from
light duty diesel trucks on a dynamometer (Moosmiiller, Arnott et al. 200la; Moosmiiller, Arnott
et al. 2001b). In brief, the findings of this previous work were derived from the comparison of
traditional filter samples of PM and EC with time averages obtained from these real-time
instruments. The DustTrak, being an optical measurement method, had sensitivity to both
particle composition and size. Photoacoustic measurements of BC agreed quite favorably with
EC measurements obtained from the Improve Protocol Thermal Optical Reflectance (TOR)
measurement obtained from samples collected on quartz filters. TOR analysis is described in
(Chow, Watson et al. 1993). With 1-second time constants the precision of the DustTrak and
photoacoustic instrument are 1 jig m"3.
Nephelometers like the DustTrak are designed to measure the light scattered by particles.
While these instruments in general have performance issues associated with angular truncation
and non-ideality in the detectors (Anderson and Ogren 1998), the angular response of the
nephelometers used in this study has not been reported in the literature. Figure 4-82 indicates the
mass-weighted scattering efficiency as a function of particle size for a wavelength of 760 nm,
pertinent to the DustTrak nephelometer. Note that if the DustTrak were a perfect instrument for
measuring particle mass the mass scattering efficiency curve would be a constant value and there
would be no composition dependence. The DustTrak mass calibration factor is determined by
the manufacturer using an ISO standard Arizona Road Dust having particle size distribution peak
near 2 microns. However, typical combustion particles have mass weighted sizes near 0.3
microns, but because this size is about at the same value of mass scattering efficiency as the
Arizona road dust value, and to the left of the peak of the curve shown in Figure 4-82, the
DustTrak produces mass concentrations typically accurate to within a factor of 2. It should be
noted that nephelometers are very sensitive to particles of sizes larger than about 0.1 to 0.3
4-164
-------
microns, depending on composition, but that their calibration as a mass standard is dependent
especially on particle size as well as composition to a lesser extent (Sioutas, Kim et al. 2000).
«
10
M
f
I 0.1
= 0.01
0.001
0.0001
— Strongly Absorbing Particle
— Weakly Absorbing Particle
Rayleigh
Regime
0.01
Wavelength 780 nm
nr=1.5 "
n( = 0.0001 (Weakly absorbing)
MJ = 1.0 (Strongly absorbing)
Density = 1 g / cc
0.1 1
Sphere Diameter (//m)
DUSTTRAK MODEL
10
Figure 4-82. Theoretical mass scattering efficiency for a perfect nephelometer.
(Strongly absorbing particles such as BC are given by the thick curve and weakly absorbing
particles such as organic carbon are given by the other curve.)
4-165
-------
The Mie DataRAM4 (DR) manufactured by Thermo Electron Inc is a more sophisticated
instrument than the TSI DustTrak (DT). The DR measures light scattering at two wavelengths,
such as 880 nm and 760 nm. The use of two wavelengths allows for better knowledge of particle
size as it relates to the mass scattering efficiency factor shown in Figure 4-82. The curves in
Figure 4-82 were computed for a wavelength of 760 nm. If they were computed for a
wavelength of 880 nm, the peak in the curves would be shifted to the right, so that for
combustion size particles, the 880 nm scattering amount would be less than the 760 nm amount.
The ratio of these two values would give a measure of particle size.
Photoacoustic instruments have been used in source sampling of BC aerosol. Sample air
is pulled continuously through an acoustical resonator and is illuminated by laser light that is
periodically modulated at the acoustical resonance frequency. Light absorption is manifested in
particle heating and this heat transfers rapidly to the surrounding air, inducing pressure
fluctuations that are picked up with a microphone on the resonator. Microphones have a very
large dynamic range (at least 6 orders of magnitude), so BC measurements can be made over a
large dynamic range with these instruments. The advancement that has been very important for
the continued success of these instruments is the ability to measure very low levels of light
absorption. Aerosol light absorption at visible and near IR wavelengths occurs throughout the
entire particle volume for typically submicron combustion particles, so BC aerosol mass
concentration is found to vary in direct proportion with light absorption. Vehicle manufactures
pursued these methods in the 1970's and 1980's using bulky Argon Ion lasers and dye lasers
(Terhune and Anderson 1977; Japar and Killinger 1979; Japar and Szkarlat 198la; Japar and
Szkarlat 1981; Japar, Szkarlat et al. 1984; Roessler 1984), and a resurgence of interest has
emerged in research laboratories that coincides with technological developments in compact,
efficient laser sources (Petzold and Niessner 1994; Petzold and Niessner 1995; Arnott,
Moosmuller et al. 1999; Moosmuller, Arnott et al. 2000).
The photoacoustic instrument developed for this work operates at a convenient
wavelength of 1047 nm where gaseous interference is not a problem and where a laser source is
available that allows for direct electronic modulation of the power at the resonator frequency.
The acoustical resonator, shown schematically in Figure 4-83, was designed for compactness,
ease of reproducibility in manufacture, and robustness with respect to use of the instrument in
very noisy, dirty sampling environments (Arnott, Moosmuller et al. 2003). The instrument
comprises two identical coupling sections, and a third resonator section. These parts are
manufactured out of aluminum. The coupling sections allow the laser beam to enter the
instrument through windows well separated from the resonator section. The sample inlets and
outlets are followed by cavities that are tuned to reduce the coupling of noise into the resonator
section. The resonator section has a horizontal tube that is 1/2 of an acoustic wavelength long,
and two vertical tubes that are 1/4 of an acoustic wavelength long. In previous designs (Arnott,
Moosmuller et al. 1999), the vertical tubes were at an angle of 45 degrees to the horizontal
instead of 90 degrees as they are now, and the tubes were formed from pipe rather than machined
with precision. The 90 degree angles allow for symmetry when deciding where the holes in the
resonator are placed to allow for laser beam and sample air passage. The piezoelectric transducer
is used as a sound source to occasionally scan the resonator resonance frequency and quality
factor for use in calibrating the instrument from an acoustical perspective. The microphone and
piezoelectric transducer sit at pressure antinodes of the acoustic standing wave, and the holes in
the resonator are at pressure nodes. The instrument is bolted together in three parts for easy
4-166
-------
disassembly in case it needs to be cleaned. The laser beam passes through the windows and the
holes in the resonator section. The laser beam pumps the acoustic wave through light absorption,
and the transfer of the associated heat to the surrounding air, in the resonator section.
Photodetector
Sample Outlet
Sample Inlet
Figure 4-83. Schematic of the photoacoustic instrument.
The photoacoustic instrument measures the aerosol light absorption coefficient (Arnott,
Moosmiiller et al. 1999; Arnott, Moosmiiller et al. 2000), and then a quantity defined as BC is
computed from the absorption coefficient. The EC part of the exhaust absorbs light at 1047 nm
much more strongly than any other common particulate aerosol in exhaust and in the atmosphere
so that it is reasonable to associate elemental carbon with aerosol light absorption. Why is it
reasonable to associate aerosol light absorption with a BC mass concentration (BC)? Because
aerosol light absorption occurs throughout the entire particle volume for sufficiently small
particles and large wavelengths of light, giving rise to a direct proportionality between the
absorption measurement and the aerosol mass for typical combustion particle of typical size, and
for the 1047 nm wavelength used in the instrument. It is perhaps inevitable to speculate that the
aerosol complex refractive index could vary with combustion source (Dalzell and Sarofim 1969)
(Fuller, Malm et al. 1999), so that the BC measured values could be different for particles
actually having the same numbers of carbon atoms in them. It is also possible to postulate that
aerosol coatings or adsorbents, or particle morphology, could also give rise to different
absorption coefficients than one would observe for uncoated particles. Experiences to date have
4-167
-------
shown that for an emission source such as a late model diesel that is rich in EC, the IMPROVE
protocol method of quantifying EC (Chow, Watson et al. 1993) correlates well with the aerosol
light absorption measurement at 1047 nm.
The following relationship is used to obtain BC concentration from the aerosol light
absorption measurement at 1047 nm:
BC (ng m"3) = 5 (m2 g"1) Babs (Mm"1) (measured at 1047 nm} . (1)
This relationship represents diesel emissions. EC from diesels provide a relatively
unambiguous measurement from the various protocols and methods that have been developed
though ambient and wood smoke samples have substantial differences (Watson, Chow et al.
1994; Chow, Watson et al. 2001). The relationship of these measurements to spark-ignition
engines is discussed in Section 4.4.3.5, Evaluation of Continuous Optical Mass Measurements.
4.5.3 Results
4.5.3.1 Evaluation of Gravimetric Mass Measurements
The gravimetric mass data were corrected for transport field blanks only (i.e., dilution
tunnel blanks have not been applied). The field blanks were collected weekly. In each case, the
filters were installed in the sampler and immediately removed and placed back in their sealed
storage bags. The field blanks are shown in Figure 4-84 in the sequence that they were collected
during Round 1 . They range from 1 . 1 to 9.9 |j,g/filter with an average of 5.4 and standard
deviation of 3.4 |j,g/filter. This compares to the measurement uncertainty for these filters of 4.6
|j,g/filter, which is determined by replicate measurement by a second technician of 30% of the
pre-weights and 100% of the post weights. The relatively large tare weight of the Teflon filter
(-150 mg/filter) is a limiting factor in the measurement uncertainty. Since the average field blank
is comparable to the measurement uncertainty, we subtracted the mean value of the transport
field blanks to all samples rather than apply week-specific blanks. The loadings on the sampled
Teflon filter prior to subtraction of the average transport field blank value are substantially
higher than the field blanks with the exception of Strata 4 and 8 during Phase 3 of the test cycle.
EPA pointed out an apparent temporal pattern in the gravimetric mass results for the
weekly field blanks collected during Round 1 (shown in Figure 4-84) which indicates that it may
not be appropriate to use an average of all field blank masses to correct the test data. The vertical
dashed lines divide the filters into three groups corresponding to how the filters were packaged
for transport to and from the sampling site (a fourth group of three field blanks were collected
but were damaged by flooding of the test facility). The third group exhibits consistently higher
mass gain than the other two. Although this appears to suggest that some change in sampling
conditions occurred during that 3 week period, the mass gains for the three filters are too uniform
(9.3 ± 0.7 ug) to be explained by contamination of the media and there is no corresponding
increase in any of the elements measured by XRF or in the carbon fractions on the corresponding
quartz filters. Note that despite the noticeable increase in mass for the last three blanks, the
differences from the rest of the blanks are not significant (bars indicate the 1 sigma uncertainty).
4-168
-------
On further investigation we determined that the post-sampling weighing of that group of
filters was performed 2 months after gravimetric analysis had been completed on all other
samples from Round 1. This occurred due to a clerical error (the filters were mistakenly
identified as void by the lab because they had originally been tagged for a vehicle test that was
cancelled). The filter packs were packaged in sets of three pairs of Teflon and quartz filters for
the three Phases of the test. The three pairs from this pack were used for the three successive
field blanks at the end of Round 1. A change in weighing conditions is an alternative explanation
that would need to be considered under this situation.
In order to monitor changes in weighing conditions, a media blank is selected from each
group of 50 filters during pre-sampling analysis and is post-weighed along with the field samples
using the same conditioning protocols. The resulting net gravimetric mass data for the media
blanks during Round 1 are presented in Figure 4-85 both chronologically and sorted to show the
distribution of values. The changes in mass on the media blanks are comparable in range to the
field blanks.
Round 1 field blanks
14.0
12.0
,_ 10.0 -
-------
media blanks - roundl
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0)
-5.0^
-10.0
-15.0
-20.0
-ft
°>
A V
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
-20.0
postweigh date
T^ULJ
LJLJ
Figure 4-85. Round 1 Media Blanks.
(Net gravimetric mass data (ng/filter) for media blanks during Round 1 are shown chronologically in the top plot
and sorted to show the distribution of values in the bottom plot. Note that the changes in mass on the media blanks
are comparable in range to the field blanks.)
4-170
-------
Unless we can discover some correctable discrepancy in the analysis procedures used for
the three high field blanks (group 3) relative to that employed for the rest of the samples, the
field blank data from group 3 should be considered invalid. Since there is no significant
difference between the other two groups of field blanks, and all are below the "MDL" of the
gravimetric analysis (twice the standard deviation of the control weights) indicated by the
horizontal dashed line, we feel it is more appropriate to use the average mass of these six blanks
to correct all of the test samples and dilution tunnel blanks. Eliminating the three suspect field
blanks reduces the correction from 5.4 to 3.5 |Jg (equivalent to about 0.6 mg/mi for a Phasel
sample). This approach is consistent with the standard procedures used by DRFs Environmental
Analysis Facility for other projects. However, many of the samples have measured mass below
this average field blank value as shown in the histogram in Figure 4-86 of the uncorrected
gravimetric mass for all Phase 3 filter samples.
CIZJ Frequency
Histogram
-"—Cumulative %
ou
g* 60
c
3 40
^^
G)
i 20
0
n,M
m o
'
m
—
0
0
CM
0
m
^•^
0
0
0
0
CM
• -
n-
I/1U.U 70
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
.0%
CD
o
^
ug
Figure 4-86. Histogram of uncorrected gravimetric mass for Phase 3 filter
samples from Round 1.
Alternatively, we could have eliminated the field blank correction to gravimetric mass
altogether, since the field blank masses are consistent with the range of mass measured for media
blanks and therefore indistinguishable from the random measurement error. Field blanks for
Round 2 are also very similar to the media blanks, with an average value of-1.5 ±1.2 ug. They
are shown in Figure 4-87 chronologically and sorted. Not correcting for field blanks would be
consistent with what is done in the Speciation Trends Network (STN) and IMPROVE aerosol
monitoring networks.
4-171
-------
1 n n
^ n
n n
c n
m n
-1^ n
-9n n
E
1/
, r
[8 1/
1 I
26 2
|
2 1
L
^
>/
1
,'!
25 3
[ ^
7 3/
] I
14 J
•
J'L
.
r T
J' J
1
R
Mi
field blanks - round 2
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
-20.0
Figure 4-87. Round 2 Media Blanks.
(Net gravimetric mass data (ug/filter) for field blanks during Round 2 are shown chronologically in the top
plot and sorted to show the distribution of values in the bottom plot. Note that the changes in mass on the field
blanks are comparable in range to the media blanks shown in Fig. 4-13.)
DRI's gravimetric mass measurements were compared to those made by EPA's
laboratory in Ann Arbor as part of quality assurance for the study. A batch of 21 Teflon filters
were sent to EPA for pre-weights and returned to DRI for determination of the pre-weights. The
filters were then sent to Kansas City and 15 of the filters were sampled during the week of 2/14.
Five sets of three Teflon filters (one for each phase) were collected for this comparison study:
twice for the correlation vehicle (Ford Taurus) and three other vehicles with varying particulate
emission rates. Six samples were treated as field/transport blanks. From three of the blanks, DRI
removed a tiny portion from each filter ring that is comparable to the magnitude of weight
changes from actual sampling. Unlike an actual sample, this change in weight would not be
subject to variations that might result from potential desorption of SVOCs. DRI determined post
weights for the 21 comparison filters and sent the filters to EPA for post weights. Mass
4-172
-------
measurements were sent to an independent third party. Upon receipt of data from both groups,
both data sets were sent to EPA and DRI simultaneously. The scatter plot of gravimetric mass
measurements by EPA and DRI and absolute differences in Figure 4-88 again show that these
differences are mostly below the limit of detection.
Gravimetric Mass Comparison
DRI (mg/filter)
12
EPA-DRI
-4
-8
-12
Figure 4-88. Gravimetric Mass Comparison.
(Scatterplot of gravimetric mass measurements by EPA and DRI (top panel) and absolute differences in
ug/filter (lower panel). Differences are mostly below the limit of detection of 8 |Jg/filter)
4-173
-------
A second round of interlaboratory gravimetric mass measurement comparisons was done
during Round 2, due to an error in handling the data from the first comparison that invalidated
the "double blind" nature of the experiment. In the second comparison; five unused Teflon filters
were weighed by each lab, then a small punch was removed from the support ring of 3 of the
filters and they were re-weighed by each lab. The results, shown in Table 4-29 and Figure 4-89,
again indicate that there is no significant bias in the gravimetric mass measurements, and all
differences in measured mass fall within the range of analytical uncertainty.
Table 4-29. Results of second gravimetric mass measurement interlaboratory
comparison.
Pre DRI-EPA
Diff
0.0150
0.0174
0.0184
0.0166
0.0177
RPD
0.009%
0.010%
0.011%
0.010%
0.011%
Post DRI-EPA
Diff
0.0155
0.0189
0.0197
0.0220
0.0224
RPD
0.009%
0.011%
0.012%
0.013%
0.014%
Pre-Post
DRI
-0.0002
-0.0013
0.7069
0.9637
0.7459
EPA
0.0003
0.0002
0.7082
0.9691
0.7506
DRI-EPA
-0.0005
-0.0015
-0.0013
-0.0054
-0.0047
RPD
-0.18%
-0.56%
-0.63%
Filter mass change (milligrams)
1.2
1.0 --
0.8 --
y= 1.004x +0.001
R2= 1.000
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Figure 4-89. Results of second gravimetric mass measurement interlaboratory
comparison.
4-174
-------
4.5.3.2 Evaluation ofQCMMass Measurements
Analysis of the QCM data record for each test proceeded in steps. The first was
correction of the QCM mass for volatile loss as mentioned in Section 4.4.2. The next was
correction of the QCM mass for collection of water on the quartz crystal during the test. This
was done using humidity measured in the QCM sample stream using the Vaisala, model M170
and applying a correction factor determined during the pre-test evaluation and calibration of the
QCM.
After the QCM mass record is corrected, the measured particulate concentrations are
calculated using moving a 10 second linear fit to the mass and sample flow data. This is a
smoothing technique that is advanced in one second intervals. At this time continuous data
recorded by the Photo-Acoustic instrument, DustTrak, DataRAM4, BKI Dynamometer (Dyno),
and for the DRI integral filter measurements is imported by the QCM analysis program. Time
alignment of these records is done using the TTL signals provided by BKI and recorded by the
QCM and Photo-Acoustic systems and nominal time delays determined from sample flow
through the CVS and the sample transport system for the continuous instruments.
Using the total dilute volume (Vmix) and distance traveled from BKFs integral Dyno
summary record and vehicle speed and torque from the continuous Dyno record, both integral
and continuous particulate mass emissions are determined. The results of this analysis for each
test are recorded in two files. The first is a summary file containing the integral filter data and
the reduced integral results from the continuous particulate instruments. The parameters
reported in this file are summarized in Table 4-30. The second file, summarized in Table 4-31,
contains the converted and time aligned data from all the continuous instruments. This includes
both measured concentrations and vehicle emissions and is reported by test phase; ie. Phase 1,
Phase 2, Hot Soak, and Phase 3. In addition, the FTP composite is reported for the instruments
that measure particulate.
4-175
-------
Table 4-30. Summary of Integral Parameters Reported for Each Test in both
Round 1 and Round 2.
Parameter
File No
QCM Bag 1 ave. cone.
QCM Bag 2 ave. cone.
QCM Bag 3 ave. cone.
QCM Bag 1 emissions
QCM Bag 2 emissions
QCM Bag 3 emissions
QCM FTP Composite
Volatile Fraction Bag1 and 2
GravBagl emissions
Grav Bag2 emissions
GravBagS emissions
Grav FTP Composite
Dust Trak Bag 1 ave. cone.
Dust Trak Bag 2 ave. cone.
Unit
I£/m3
I£/m3
I£/m3
mg/mi
mg/mi
mg/mi
mg/mi
num.
mg/mi
mg/mi
mg/mi
mg/mi
I£/m3
I£/m3
Parameter
Dust Trak Bag 3 ave. cone.
Data Ram Bag lave. cone.
Data Ram Bag 2 ave. cone.
Data Ram Bag 3 ave. cone.
BC Bag 1 ave. cone.
BC Bag 2 ave. cone.
BC Bag 3 ave. cone.
Bag 1 DR
Bag 2 DR
Hot Soak DR
Bag 3 DR
Grav Bag 1 ave. cone.
Grav Bag 2 ave. cone.
Grav Bag 3 ave. cone.
Model Year
Unit
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
num.
num.
num.
num.
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
Ife/m3
yyyy
Parameter
model
Vehicle Type
odometer
Bin No.
replicate?
Humidity Time Corn
Humidity Correction
QCM DELAY (No dilution)
QCM Delay (With Dilution)
PA Delay
Average Time (sec)
QC Code
Comment
Unit
car/truck
mi.
num.
yes/no
sec.
num.
num.
num.
sec.
sec.
*
*
Table 4-31. Summary of Reduced Data Reported for Each Test in Both Round 1
and Round 2.
Parameter
Time All
Mass All
Time Bag 1
Mass Bag 1
Time Bag 2
Mass Bag 2
Time HS
Mass HS
Time Bag 3
Mass Bag 3
Unit
sec.
MQ
sec.
Hg
sec.
Hg
sec.
ng
sec.
MQ
Parameter
Time Bag 1
Cone. Bag 1
Time Bag 2
Cone. Bag 2
Time HS
Cone. HS
Time Bag 3
Cone. Bag 3
Time All
Cone. All
Unit
sec.
Hg/m3
sec.
Hg/m3
sec.
Hg/m3
sec.
Hg/m3
sec.
Hg/m3
Parameter
Time PA
Cone. PA
Time Dust Trak
Dust Trak Cone.
Time Data Ram
Data Ram Cone.
Time - Torque
Torque
Time - Speed
Speed
Unit
sec.
Hg/m3
sec.
Hg/m3
sec.
Hg/m3
sec.
Ft-Lbs/sec.
sec.
mph
4-176
-------
In Table 4-30 a QC parameter is included as well as a comment field. The general intent
is to indicate which files and parts of files should be voided, indicated by a prefix V, due to
problems encountered during a test. A problem flag, indicated by a prefix F, was also used for
the various instrument records. This is intended to signal that the data should be reviewed and
analyzed to determine if it is valid before proceeding to use it. Table 4-32 summarizes the QC
codes used in both Round 1 and Round 2 summary files
Tables 4-32. A Summary of QC Codes Used in the Integral Summary File.
Round 1
Round 2
QC Codes
FDP
VDP
VD
VD1,2,HS,3
FD1,2,HS,3
VV
VQ1,2,HS,3
FQ1,2,HS,3
FPA
FQPAD
FTA
NAN
Cv
DewPoint Problem Flag
Dewpoint Void
Total Dyno Void
Partial Dyno Void Phase(s)
Dyno Problem Flag Phase(s)
Vehicle Void
QCM Void Phase(s)
QCM Problem Flag Phase(s)
PA Problem Flag
QCM PA Dyno Flag
Time Alignment Flag
Not a Number
Control Vehicle (REFERENCE)
QC Codes
FDP
VDP
VD
VD1,2,HS,3
FD1,2,HS,3
VV
VQ1,2,HS,3
FQ1,2,HS,3
VPA
FPA
FQPAD
FTA
NAN
RDM
VG
FG
DewPoint Problem Flag
Dewpoint Void
Total Dyno Void
Partial Dyno Void Phase(s)
Dyno Problem Flag Phase(s)
Vehicle Void
QCM Void Phase(s)
QCM Problem Flag Phase(s)
PA Void
PA Problem Flag
QCM PA Dyno Flag
Time Alignment Flag
Not a Number
Raw Data Modified
Gravimetric Void
Gravimetric Problem Flag
The reduced data files containing all of the continuous PM instrument files can be used to
provide displays of the results of the data reduction process for the QCM. Figures 4-90 and 4-91
provide an example of this for QCM and BC mass concentrations compared with Dyno Torque.
The figures result from tests of the same vehicle in Round 1 and Round 2. They display the
general differences noted between tests conducted in the summer (Round 1) and winter (Round
2).
4-177
-------
500
1000 1500
Time, sec.
2000
Figure 4-90. Example of Reduced Data for Round 1.
2500
"QCM Mass-
Black Carbon
Torque
500
1000 1500
Time, sec.
2000
25
20
15
0)
10 E
o
2500
Figure 4-91. Example of Reduced Data for Round 2.
4-178
-------
One of the principle differences that can be noted in these examples is the increase in particulate
emissions during the winter months. This is particularly true for the cold start (Phase 1) portion
of the tests.
4.5.3.3 Comparison ofQCM Versus Time-Integrated Gravimetric Mass Measurements
4.5.3.3.1 Round 1 Comparison
Averages of the integral emission rate data from the summary file are presented in Table
4-33. These results reflect the systematic reduction of emissions for the newer categories of
vehicles. The table provides a summary of emission rates for each phase of the Unified Test
Cycle for both the QCM and the Gravimetric Filter results. The table also lists the composite
emission rate from the same calculation as that used for the FTP Cycle. It should be noted that,
with the exception of Pre-1981 Cars, the QCM reports a higher emission rate than the
gravimetric filter. Also the emission rate for the Pre-1981 Trucks are also shown to be less than
the Pre-1981 Cars.
Table 4-33. Average Emission Rates for Round 1 in mg/mile Derived from QCM
and Gravimetric Filter Measurements for all Test Phases.
Vehicle
Year
TRUCKS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
CARS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
QCM Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
62.03
44.23
18.92
13.20
202.96
32.95
16.28
14.98
50.65
16.74
8.09
4.53
15.16
23.87
6.94
3.29
22.58
17.20
11.89
3.44
33.18
18.18
7.02
2.96
Grav Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
87.80
93.80
14.48
9.58
160.77
35.02
11.43
7.40
45.05
37.65
11.13
4.01
73.09
18.94
7.54
2.48
9.14
51.05
14.41
2.33
63.73
8.79
5.08
1.80
4-179
-------
4.5.3.3.2 Round 2 Comparison
Averages of the integral emission rate data from the summary file for Round 2 are
presented in Table 4-34. These results reflect the systematic reduction of emissions for the
newer categories of vehicles. The table provides a summary of emission rates for each phase of
the Unified Test Cycle for both the QCM and the Gravimetric Filter results. The table also lists
the composite emission rate from the same calculation as that used for the FTP Cycle.
Table 4-34. Average Emission Rates for Round 2 in mg/mile Derived from QCM
and Gravimetric Filter Measurements for all Test Phases.
Vehicle
Year
TRUCKS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
CARS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
QCM Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1
139.04
104.91
38.25
33.33
74.95
71.68
42.20
29.67
Phase 2
39.79
20.83
16.28
8.38
9.71
16.01
16.00
9.31
Phase 3
22.27
21.37
10.95
7.51
9.52
14.07
7.67
3.92
Grav Emission Rates (mg/mi)
Phase 1
281.33
210.94
40.05
40.84
361.73
114.81
55.06
46.88
Phase 2
101.70
31.43
19.13
6.02
42.34
23.86
16.25
6.20
Phase 3
28.12
22.16
5.22
3.26
14.31
13.68
6.70
4.21
4-180
-------
4.5.3.4 Average QCM-measured concentrations relative to vehicle speed emissions
4.5.3.4.1 Round 1
Figures 4-92 through 4-97 display the average continuous Round 1 CVS concentrations
measured using the QCM for four categories (BINS) each of trucks and cars tested for Phases 1,
3, and 2 of the test cycle. A nominal dynamometer speed trace is included in each figure for
reference. Only vehicle tests for which no void or partial void was noted during reduction of the
data were included in the averages. Consequently, these results should be considered as
censured.
1600
Phase 1
Trucks
m
-200
Time, sec.
100
•Pre 1981 Trucks —1981-1990 Trucks ^—1991-1995 Trucks —1996-2005 Trucks — Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-92 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 1 Trucks.
It will be noticed in this and subsequent figures that the QCM consistently reports
negative concentrations during parts of the various test cycle components. This should not be
considered a flaw in the instrument but rather an indication that volatile components of
particulate collected during accelerations and high-speed portions of the test cycle are desorbing
from the collected paniculate. This is a phenomena that is common to collected vehicle
emissions particulate but not accounted for in integral filter measurements.
4-181
-------
600
Phase 3
Trucks
-200
Time Sec.
100
•Pre 1981 Trucks
•1981-1990 Trucks
1991-1995 Trucks
•1996-2005 Trucks
•Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-93 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 3 Trucks.
4-182
-------
2800
Phase 2
Trucks
-200
1300
Time, sec.
• 10
•20
>30
•40
I
Q.
0)
hso g.
V)
Q)
•60 j|
-------
3300
-200
•Pre1981 Cars
•1981-1990 Cars
Time, sec.
1991-1995 Cars
•1996-1005 Cars
•Speed (MPH)
100
Figure 4-95 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 1 Cars.
It should be noted that the Pre-1981 Car concentrations are much higher than the comparable
results for Pre-1981 Trucks. Even though only two trucks were tested in this category, it would
seem that the older trucks are better taken care of than older cars.
4-184
-------
750
-150
Q.
W
100
Time, sec.
-Pre 1981 Cars —1981-1990 Cars —1991-1995 Cars —1996-2005 Cars —Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-96 Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 3 Cars.
4-185
-------
1450
1250
-350
•Pre 1981 Cars
•1981-1990 Cars
Time, Sec.
—1991-1995 Cars
•1996-2005 Cars
•Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-97. Round 1 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 2 Cars.
In all the figures, a systematic reduction in measured concentrations can be noted for the newer
categories of vehicles.
4-186
-------
4.5.3.4.2 Round 2
Figures 4-98 through 4-103 display the average continuous Round 2 CVS concentrations
measured using the QCM for four categories (BINS) each of Trucks and Cars tested for Phases
1,3, and 2 of the test cycle. Only vehicle tests for which no void or partial void was noted
during reduction of the data were included in the averages. Consequently, these results should
be considered as censured.
2800
I
a.
-200
90
100
Time, sec.
-Pre 1981 Trucks ^1981-1990 Trucks ^1991-1995 Trucks ^1996-2005 Trucks Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-98 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 1 Trucks.
4-187
-------
550
450
-250
Time, sec.
10
20
30
40
50
I
Q.
W
90
100
-Pre 1981 Trucks ^1981-1990 Trucks ^1991-1995 Trucks ^1996-2005 Trucks ^Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-99 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 3 Trucks.
4-188
-------
3600
3100
00
-400
X
a.
I
V)
70
90
100
Time, sec.
-Pre 1981 Trucks ^1981-1990 Trucks ^1991-1995 Trucks ^1996-2005 Trucks ^Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-100 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 2 Trucks.
4-189
-------
1170
-230
•Pre 1981 Cars
•1981-1990 Cars
Time, sec.
•1991-1995 Cars
•1996-2005 Cars
•Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-101 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 1 Cars.
4-190
-------
500
-200
Time, sec.
Q.
tn
70
80
90
100
-Pre 1981 Cars ^1981-1990 Cars ^1991-1995 Cars ^1996-2005 Cars —Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-102 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 3 Cars.
4-191
-------
3600
-400
100
Time, sec.
-Pre 1981 Trucks ^—1981-1990 Trucks ^—1991-1995 Trucks ^—1996-2005 Trucks ^—Speed (MPH)
Figure 4-103 Round 2 Averaged CVS Particulate Mass Concentrations - QCM
Phase 2 Cars.
4-192
-------
4.5.3.5 Evaluation of Continuous Optical Mass Measurements
Figure 4-104 shows scatter plots of time averaged DustTrak and Mie DataRAM4 phase
averaged data (i.e. each point represents a time average from phase 1, 2, or 3 of the unified
cycle). Note that for mass concentrations below 250 jig m" relative agreement is found among
these instruments as illustrated in Figure 4-104a. However, much more scatter occurs for high
mass concentrations as shown in Figure 4-104b. Finally, Figure 4-104b shows that the
DataRAM4 values are much in excess of those of the DustTrak. The DataRAM4 manufacturer
states an upper range for the instrument of 400,000 jig m"3, though a recent email correspondence
with an expert (Wayne Harmon, 2004) on the instrument from the company that manufactures it
is quoted here: "For vehicles with high emission, it may be necessary to dilute the air sample.
The background will become slightly elevated due to contamination if high concentrations
(above 20 mg m"3) are sampled for an hour or more." Notice that 20 mg m"3 is 20,000 ug m"3,
well below the stated upper range of the instrument.
1000
250 500 750 1000
DustTrak PM (pg m3}
ooooooooooo
0000000000
gggggggggi
DustTrak PM (pg m3)
Figure 4-104. PM data from the DustTrak and Data RAM 4 for a) low and b) high
range.
Which nephelometer is closer to the "actual value" of aerosol-mass concentration? To
answer this question one needs to keep in mind that aerosol mass concentration is a fleeting
quantity. Change the air temperature or gaseous composition and the gas to particle phase
partition is upset. When we capture particles on a filter and gases may also adsorb onto the
particles and filter. Figure 4-105 shows the comparison of gravimetric mass with nephelometer
mass for phase averaged data. Note in Figures 4-105a and 4-105b that both nephelometers
produce values much larger than gravimetric mass for very high values of mass, though the
DustTrak is closer to gravimetric mass than is the DataRAM4. Over the lower range shown in
Figures 4-105c and Figure 4-105d much scatter is noted between nephelometer mass and
4-193
-------
gravimetric mass, and that the DT and DR have about the same amount of scatter. It is likely
that variations in particle size and composition, and uncertainty in gravimetric mass give rise to
the scattering seen in Figure 4-105.
1 ISUUUU
90000
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
n i
-
-
-
•
_
*
_
f a)
IUITUUU
90000
«£ 80000
ai 70000
S
^ 60000
"*• 50000
'
5 40000
£ 30000
•
-
•
*
i
i
Bj '
| 20000 f ,
10000 &4
n « ! i i. i
b)
ooooooooooo
ooooooooooo
OOOOOOOOOO
1000
750
500
250
Grav. Mass Cone. (>rg m"3)
1000
Grav. Mass Cone, (f/g m'3)
0 250 500 750 1000
Grav. Mass Cone, (pg m'3)
0 250 500 750 1000
Grav. Mass Cone, (pg m'3)
Figure 4-105. Scatter plots of gravimetric mass and nephelometer mass for the
DustTrak and Data RAM 4. Wide range in a) and b) and a lower narrower range in c)
and d).
Figure 4-106 shows histograms of emission rates computed from DustTrak and
DataRAM4 nephelometer measurements of PM averaged over Phases 1 through 3 of the unified
cycle. It was necessary to use a logarithmic plot because the emission rates in the smallest bin, 0-
20 mg/mile, dominate all other measurements. Note that the DataRAM4 indicates considerably
more instances of very large emission rates than does the DustTrak. The gross shapes of the
distributions are similar.
4-194
-------
1000
b 100
10
1
1000
100
10
TSI DUSTRAK NEPHELOMETER
DATARAM NEPHELOMETER
o o
a i
o
«J
O
CM
s
^
•n
O
o
tO
SO ^ Ti
M <£. o o
Optical Particle Mass Emission Rate (mg/mlle)
Figure 4-106. Histograms of optical PM obtained with the TSI DustTrak and
DataRAM4 nephelometers.
(The DataRAM4 histogram has more cases of very high emitters than does the DustTrak
or other samplers. Each car and each phase are counted as a single occurrence of data for a total
of 250 cars times 3 Phases per car.)
4-195
-------
Figure 4-107 shows a histogram of the number of occurrences of different BC emission
rates. It has a form similar to the DT and DR emission rate histograms shown in Figure 4-106.
The average BC emission rate was 4 mg/mile, and the average PM emission rate computed from
the DustTrak data was 34 mg/mile. If all of the DustTrak PM is considered to be carbonaceous,
then the ratio of BC to PM is around 1/9. The inset table shows average BC and PM emission
rates from the phase 1 data set. Figure 4-108 shows histograms of the ratio of BC to PM, with
PM obtained from the DT and DR nephelometers, and with gravimetric mass. Figure 4-108a is
the most reasonable representation of this ratio. Most spark ignition PM is known to be OC and
most PM is associated with total carbon (TC=OC + BC). The DataRAM4 produces too many
large values of this ratio as shown in Figure 4-108c. The gravimetric mass in Figure 4-108c
when used to compute the ratio BC to PM has a very broad unrealistic histogram, with many
values greater than unity, and some less than zero. The uncertainty in the gravimetric mass is
much greater than that of all the other PM measures. It should be noted that in general,
continuous PM measurements (with the exception of the QCM) were primarily used to monitor
the state of the dilution tunnel and provide an assessment of the reasonableness of QCM data.
These systems were primarily used to assess system and test condition changes, rather than to
provide a quantitative assessment of continuous emission rates (as was the intent of using the
QCM).
4-196
-------
1000
Avenge
BC
Emission
Rate
(ing/mile)
4.06
Avenge
DTPM
Rate
(rag/mile)
34.83
in
BC Emission Rate (mg/mile)
Figure 4-107. Histogram of BC mass emission rate obtained with the DRI
photoacoustic instrument.
250
«200
i 150
° 100
50
• a) b)
ill It. l
dddddddddof
o" T-' of pa •»" in ce" "
"2.2.
dddddddddcT
o T-' M" n" •» in to" N" oa" d
........ "2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2." ........
Ratio Black Carbon to DustTrak PM Ratio Black Carbon to DataRAM4 PM Ratio Black Carbon to Grav. Mass PM
pa •»" in ce" K eo" ci
2.2.2.2.2.2.™
dddddddddo>.
o" i- M" n" *f in" is" r~' oo" d
"2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.™
Figure 4-108. Histograms of the ratio BC to total PM
(Total PM from the DustTrak in a), from the DataRAM4 in b), and from the gravimetric mass in
c). The vertical scale is the same in each plot. Histograms were developed from phase averaged
data, excluding cases where the BC average is less than 2 jig m"3.)
4-197
-------
4.5.3.6 Average BC and PM concentrations in each stratum as related to vehicle speed
The utility of continuous measurements of BC and PM are most evident in evaluating the
driving conditions that give rise to the bulk of the emissions. Figures 4-109 through 4-116
illustrate the emissions of BC as measured by the photoacoustic instrument, and PM as measured
by the DustTrak nephelometer as a function of time. The data are from Round 1 and are averaged
by model-year strata for cars and trucks. The vehicle speed profile is also overlain on these plots,
and this trace is inverted so that the emissions can readily be seen. To produce the data shown in
Figures 4-109 through 4-116, all data were aligned in time to the start of the unified cycle, and
interpolated to 1-second steps. The captions document the data in detail, though some highlights
are given here. Figure 4-109 is typical of the comparison of Phases 1 and 3 of the unified cycle.
Phase 1 commences after a cold start of the vehicle, and phase 3 after a warm start. The vehicle
speed profile is the same for these phases. Since Figures 4-109 through 4-116 are only intended
to illustrate relative emission rate changes as measured by these different systems, they are only
provided for Round 1. However, continuous emission rate measurement results as measured
using the different instruments are provided in Tables 4-35 though 4-37 for both Rounds of the
study.
Phase 1 emission rates are generally higher than those of phase 3 for all classes of
vehicles, though the older vehicles have more emissions at all times. Phase 1 emissions from
newer vehicles are associated with accelerations, decelerations, as well as higher speed driving,
whereas phase 3 emissions from newer vehicles are mostly closely associated with accelerations.
Phase 2 emissions from both cars (Figure 4-111) and trucks (Figure 4-112) are dominant during
the high acceleration portion of the driving cycle before time 900 seconds.
Emission rates for each phase of the unified cycle, for each stratum of vehicles model
year ranges, for BC and total particle mass (PM) are given in Tables 4-35 through 4-37. PM
obtained from the DustTrak nephelometer are indicated by "DT" and those from the DataRAM4
are given by "DR". Note that BC emission rates generally decrease from older to newer
vehicles, though because the class of older trucks (pre 1980) was only represented by 2 vehicles
the averages are highly uncertain. Note that BC and DT PM emission rates were highest (for
cars) during phase 1, though phase 2 and 3 values were similar. Note that emission rates
computed from the DataRAM4 (DR) are usually way in excess of those obtained with the
DustTrak, except for those cases of low emission rates. The DataRAM4 seems to have a
problem with high concentrations where it seems some optics get dirty, and this adds a scattering
amount that gets interpreted erroneously as PM.
Note the interesting truck values for the 1970-1980 stratum. The BC emission rates were
very high for this category in phase 1, though were much lower once the vehicles warmed up in
Phases 2 and 3. Since this supplemental analysis was only performed as a cross-check, emission
rates were computed based on nominal miles driven, on the average, during each phase, and from
the nominal sample volume pulled through the constant volume sampler. The uncertainty
introduced by using nominal values is likely around 20%. Phase 1, 2, and 3 miles driven were
taken to be 1.18 miles, 8.6 miles, and 1.18 miles. The flow volume was 71.75 m3 for Phases 1
and 3, and 267.8 m3 for phase 2.
4-198
-------
2500
BC (ug/m3)_96-5
BC (ug/m3)_91-95
BC (ug/m3)_80-90
BC (ug/m3)_Pre1980
— Vehicle Speed
-------
2500
E 2000
S
1500
BC (ug/m3) 96-05 Trueks
BC (ug/m3)_91-95
BC (ug/m3) ,80-90
BC (ug/m3) Pre 1980
| — Vehicle Speed (mph)Prel 980
VM
PHASE 3
TRUCKS
PHASE 1
TRUCKS
100
150
Time (sec)
Unified Cycle
200
250
0
10
20
30 Q.
40 r
50 I
w
60 o
-------
GOOD
300
BC (ug/m3) 80-90
BC(ug/m3) Pre1980
— Vehicle Speed (mph)_Pre1980
— BC
— BC (ug/m3)_91-95
500
700 900
Time (sec)
Phase 2
Unified Cycle
1100
1300
Figure 4-111. BC emissions during phase 2 of the unified cycle for passenger
cars
(For newer (lower graph) and older (upper graph) vehicles. Note that BC emissions peak
during the aggressive acceleration in about the middle portion of the cycle right before 900
seconds. Note in the upper graph that the oldest category of vehicles had high emission on both
accelerations as well as decelerations.)
4-201
-------
2000
BC (ug/m3)_80-90
BC (ug/m3) Prel980
— Vehicle Speed (mph)_Pre1980
BC (ug/m3)_96-05 Trucks
BC (ug/m3)_91-95
500
700
900
Time (sec)
Phase 2
Unified Cycle
1100
1300
Figure 4-112. BC emissions during phase 2 of the unified cycle for trucks
(Note that in comparing the older cars and trucks that the older trucks had less emission
during Phase 2 than did the cars. This could be an artifact of the sample size, though it does
point out that older vehicles, when warmed up, can have modest emission rates.)
4-202
-------
DT PM (ug/m3) 96-5
DTPM(ug/m3)_91-95
DT PM (ug/m3)_80-90
DT PM (ug/m3)_Pre1980
— Vehicle Speed (mph)_Pre198Q
50
100
150
Time (sec)
Unified Cycle
200
250
Figure 4-113. Stratum averaged DustTrak PM emission for passenger cars as it
relates to vehicle speed.
(Phase 1 is associated with a cold start of the vehicles, and Phase 3 is an identical driving
cycle but one that follows a warm start after an 8 minute soak period. Note that newer cars have
much less emission in Phase 3.)
4-203
-------
Q,
16000
%
14000
'12000
10000
8000
6000
E 4000
2 2000
300o8
S1
DT PM (ug/m3)_96-05 Trucks
DTPM(ug/m3)_91-95
DT PM (ug/m3)_8Q-90
DT PM (ug/m3)_Pre1980
— Vehicle Speed (mph) Pre1980
PHASE 3
TRUCKS
PHASE 1
TRUCKS
100
150
Time (sec)
Unified Cycle
200
250
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0°°
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
Q.
E
en
£
"U
100
300
Figure 4-114. Stratum averaged DustTrak PM emission for trucks as it relates to
vehicle speed.
(Note the high emissions during phase 1 of the oldest truck, and that it is much less in
Phase 3, illustrating that the warm vehicle emission rates are much lower. Note that there were
only 2 trucks in that category. Cleaner trucks behave as cleaner cars. Note that PM emission
rates of the model year 80-90 vehicles during Phase 3 are high and seem to have little relation
with the driving cycle.)
4-204
-------
£-35000
I
)30000
DT PM (ug/m3)_80-90
DT PM (ug/m3)_Pre1980
— Vehicle Speed (mph)_Pre1980
500
700
900
Time (sec)
Phase 2
Unified Cycle
1100
1300
PM(ug/m3) 96-5
DTPM(ugftn3)_91-95
Figure 4-115. DustTrak PM emissions during phase 2 of the unified cycle for
passenger cars
(For newer (lower graph) and older (upper graph) vehicles. Note that PM emissions peak
during the aggressive acceleration in about the middle portion of the cycle right before 900
seconds. Note in the upper graph that the oldest category of vehicles had high emission on both
accelerations as well as decelerations. Note that the older vehicles shown in the upper graph had
about a factor of 5 more emission during the high acceleration portion of the cycle before 900
seconds.)
4-205
-------
Q 6000
DT PM (ug/m3) 80-90
DT PM (ug/m3)_Pre1980
— Vehicle Speed (mph)_Pre1960
D.
CO
0)
DT PM (ug/m3)_96-05 Trucks
DT PM (ug/m3)_91-95
TRUCKS
-ju-JUl^^fl
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
30
70 *
80 £
90
100
0
10
20 ~
30 £
40
50
60?
70 1
80 •>
90
100
500
700
900
Time (sec)
Phase 2
Unified Cycle
1100
1300
Figure 4-116. DustTrak PM emissions during phase 2 of the unified cycle for
trucks
(Newer cars (see the lower graph in Fig. 4-28) have about 1/2 the emissions as newer
trucks (lower graph above) and both have peaks during accelerations.)
4-206
-------
Table 4-35. Emission rates in mg/mile for Phase 1 of the unified cycle for cars
and trucks.
Phase 1
Model Year
Round 1
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
Round 2
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
Table 4-36.
Phase 2
Model Year
Round 1
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
Round 2
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
BC
63.9
18.1
4.4
3.6
168.4
35.6
20.4
12.8
Emission
BC
25.5
4.9
0.7
0.3
20.0
3.1
1.2
0.4
Car
DustTrak
249.2
112.7
26.1
27.2
630.9
207.2
103.8
89.1
DataRam
396.7
781.8
73.4
167.5
2285.7
1026.5
259.5
137.3
rates in mg/mile for Phase
and trucks.
Car
DustTrak
138.4
33.2
11.8
3.8
50.8
31.3
20.8
2.5
DataRam
677.8
213.7
70.6
32.0
82.4
186.0
111.3
2.9
BC
72.5
19.7
3.4
4.1
57.3
68.1
15.6
12.6
2 of the
BC
0.9
4.8
0.5
0.5
3.2
10.4
0.6
0.3
Truck
DustTrak
171.5
324.8
33.1
14.9
422.0
364.3
67.5
54.9
unified cycle
Truck
DustTrak
9.2
214.2
10.9
3.2
41.8
39.4
15.2
1.5
DataRam
194.2
4557.9
171.1
14.0
2401.7
1771.7
165.4
58.7
for cars
DataRam
69.6
3800.6
78.4
2.8
129.8
91.3
32.8
2.0
4-207
-------
Table 4-37. Emission rates in mg/mile for Phase 3 of the unified cycle for cars and
trucks.
Phase 3
Model Year
Round 1
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
Round 2
1971-1980
1981-1990
1991-2000
2001-2010
BC
37.5
3.8
0.8
0.3
28.7
1.7
0.7
0.1
Car
DustTrak
92.1
22.2
7.2
2.3
52.4
15.2
4.2
0.5
DataRam
105.6
142.7
13.3
3.8
93.6
131.8
7.6
0.5
BC
1.9
7.3
0.8
0.4
3.0
3.0
0.5
0.2
Truck
DustTrak
4.8
192.0
18.9
1.8
22.9
19.1
2.7
0.8
DataRam
4.7
2086.8
78.7
2.1
21.2
92.9
4.7
0.9
4.5.4 Conclusions
Gravimetric mass measurements of field blanks ranged from 1.1 to 9.9 (j,g/filter
with an average of 5.4 and standard deviation of 3.4 |j,g/filter for Round 1,
and -1.5 ± 1.2 |j,g /filter for Round 2. This compares to the measurement
uncertainty for these filters of 4.6 |j,g/filter, which is determined by replicate
measurement.
Intel-laboratory comparisons of gravimetric mass measurements by DRI and EPA
show agreement to within the analytical uncertainty of the method and no
systematic bias.
Continuous methods show large variations in PM emissions with vehicle speed.
They can be useful for characterizing the effect of driving patterns on emissions
and phase-specific emission rates.
Photoacoustic BC is consistent with EC measured by TOR analysis of quartz
filters. BC is a viable method for measuring inorganic carbon emissions with high
time resolution, even when concentrations are low.
Nephelometer based methods for continuous PM measurements agree well at
lower concentrations, but show significant overestimation at higher
concentrations. This problem is particularly severe for the DataRAM4and can
result in over-emphasis of the emissions for high emitters.
PM2.5 concentrations for the 5-minute test cycle Phases are difficult to measure by
gravimetric analysis of filter samples when the vehicle emission rates are low,
4-208
-------
especially Phase 3. Continuous methods, if properly calibrated, may be more
useful in those cases.
4.6 Speciated Emissions of Particulate Matter
4.6.1 Background
Receptor models have been widely used to estimate the contributions of various sources
of measured ambient particulate matter concentrations (Hopke, 1997; Henry, 1997; Watson et
al., 2001). This approach requires knowledge of the number of sources contributing to the
observed airborne concentration of particle mass and chemical species, but also the composition
of the particles emitted from each source. The emission rate and chemical composition of
gaseous and particulate pollutants from motor vehicles depend upon many factors, which include
vehicle age and mileage, fuel, lubricating oil, emission control technology, vehicle operating
mode (cold start, hot stabilized), load, ambient temperature, and state of maintenance. Most
gasoline vehicles are relatively clean, especially in hot-stabilized mode. Virtually all of the PM
emissions from "normal emitters" come from the first few minutes during a cold start and from
hard accelerations with relatively higher amounts of elemental carbon during both cold starts and
hard accelerations (see Section 4.5). In contrast, high emitters have cumulative PM emissions
that are more linear with time than normal emitters with higher OC/TC ratios. Because of the
variability of OC/EC splits, gasoline and diesel vehicles are difficult to apportion by carbon
analysis alone, and EC is not a unique tracer for diesel exhaust.
More recent applications of the chemical mass balance (CMB) receptor model utilized
particulate organic markers (Schauer et al., 1996; Watson et al., 1998; Fujita et al., 1998) as well
as combination of particulate and gaseous markers (Schauer et al., 2002). Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH) are present in emissions from all combustion sources and the relative
proportions of different PAH compounds in emissions from a given source may vary over
several orders of magnitude. PAH exhibit a wide range of volatility with naphthalene existing
almost entirely in the gas phase, while benzo(a)pyrene, other five-ring PAH, and higher ring
PAH are predominantly adsorbed on particles. The intermediate three- and four-ring PAH (semi-
volatile PAH) are distributed between the two Phases. Gasoline vehicles, whether low or high
emitter, emit greater relative amounts of high molecular-weight particulate PAHs (e.g.,
benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene, ideno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, and coronene) (Zielinska
and Sagebiel, 2001; Fujita et al., 2005) than diesel vehicles. These PAHs have been found in
used gasoline motor oil but not in fresh oil nor in diesel engine oil. Diesel vehicles also emit
particulate PAHs, but in lower relative proportions to other PAHs, especially the semi-volatile
methylated PAHs. Diesel emissions contained higher proportions of dimethylnaphthalenes,
methyl- and dimethylphenanthrenes, and methylfluorenes. Gasoline vehicles, even normal
emitters, emit volatile PAH's (e.g., naphthalene and methylnaphthalenes) in amounts per unit of
fuel that equals or exceeds that of diesel vehicles. These semi-volatile PAH and other organic
compounds (e.g., alkanes) in motor vehicle emissions contribute to the formation of secondary
organic aerosols.
Hopanes and steranes have also been identified as potential molecular markers for PM
emission from motor vehicles. These organic compounds are present in lubricating oil with
similar composition for both gasoline and diesel vehicles and are not present in gasoline or diesel
4-209
-------
fuels. Emission rates of hopanes and steranes are the highest for both gasoline and diesel "high
emitting" vehicles. While hopanes and steranes are useful markers for internal combustion
engines, the composition of various individual hopanes and steranes are similar in the exhaust
from both gasoline and diesel engines. However, the relative abundances of hopanes and steranes
to emissions of elemental carbon differ substantially for the diesel and gasoline vehicles. The
differences in the ratios of hopanes plus steranes to elemental carbon could be used to quantify
the contribution of gasoline-powered and diesel-powered vehicles (Schauer, 2002).
A major goal of the vehicle test program in Kansas City is to obtain up-to-date gasoline-
powered vehicle exhaust composition profiles for application in developing speciated emissions
inventories and ambient source apportionment studies. An important issue in the general
applicability of these profiles is whether gas-particle partitioning of certain organic compounds
with the high-volume source sampling used in Kansas City differs substantially from the low-
flow, ambient sampling techniques used in some source apportionment studies. To address this
issue, organic samples were also collected during Round 2 with ambient, low-flow samplers to
compare with source, high-volume organic samples collected in the Kansas City Light Duty
Vehicle Emissions Study.
4.6.2 Experimental Methods
BKI conducted the vehicle emissions tests on their transportable Clayton Model CTE-50-
0 chassis dynamometer over the LA92 Unified Driving Cycle. The test site and dynamometer
setup are described in Chapter 2. The vehicle emissions tests were conducted in Kansas City
during July to September 2004 (summer/Round 1) and January to March 2005 (winter/Round 2).
The cycle consists of a cold start Phase 1 (first 310 seconds), a stabilized Phase 2 (311-1427
second), a 600-second engine off soak, and a warm start Phase 3 (repeat of Phase 1 of the LA92).
Cars and light-duty trucks were recruited for testing in four model year groups (Pre-1981, 1981-
90, 1991-95 and 1996 and newer). The vehicle groupings for trucks and cars are designated
strata 1-4 and 5-8, respectively. The strata are ordered from to older to newer model years.
Details of the vehicle recruitment aspects of the study are given in Chapter 2. Tables 4-38 and 4-
39 summarize the numbers of samples collected and subsequently selected for chemical analysis
in Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Pairs of Teflon and quartz filters were collected for each of the
three phases of the cold start LA92 driving cycle, and integrated samples were collected over the
entire cycle for organic speciation samples. Full sets of sampling media were also collected for
daily 60-minute tunnel blanks and weekly (approximate) field/transport blanks. Teflon and
quartz filters were collected during weekly tests of the calibration vehicle and for 15 replicate
tests in Round 1 and 10 in Round 2.
4-210
-------
Table 4-38. Summary of sample selection for chemical analysis during Round 1.
Week
Week Ending
Vehicles Tested
1 17-Jul
2 24-Jul
3 31 -Jul
4 7-Aug
5 14-Aug
6 21-Aug
7 28-Aug
8 4-Sep
9 11-Sep
10 18-Sep
11 25-Sep
12 2-Oct
Actual
Planned
STRATUM
1 2
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 2
0 0
0 2
0 1
0 1
0 2
0 0
2 10
16 26
3
0
5
1
4
2
1
2
0
2
3
0
1
21
26
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
2
1
0
1
6
2
34
39
5
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
0
1
6
16
6
0
3
2
2
5
0
6
5
5
7
1
1
37
51
7
3
1
3
5
5
3
7
5
2
4
5
8
51
34
8
2
8
15
7
6
6
5
4
2
13
13
12
93
42
Weekly
Total
9
23
25
22
24
16
22
17
14
30
27
25
254
250
Dilution
Blanks
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
6
6
5
65
60
Transit Corr.
Blanks Vehicle
0 0
0 0
0 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 3
9 12
12 12
Replicate
Tests
0
1
0
4
1
2
0
0
1
1
4
0
14
15
Samples Selected for Chemical Analysis
1 17-Jul
2 24-Jul
3 31 -Jul
4 7-Aug
5 14-Aug
6 21-Aug
7 28-Aug
8 4-Sep
9 11-Sep
10 18-Sep
11 25-Sep
12 2-Oct
Actual
Planned
% of Total (a)
Individual/Composites
1 17-Jul
2 24-Jul
3 31 -Jul
4 7-Aug
5 14-Aug
6 21-Aug
7 28-Aug
8 4-Sep
9 11-Sep
10 18-Sep
11 25-Sep
12 2-Oct
ACTUAL
PLANNED
No./Comp (b)
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 4
4 4
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
6
6
100% 40% 29%
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
8
10
24%
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
5
5
83%
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
4
11%
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
7
9
14%
1
3
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
0
0
15
10
16%
3
11
4
0
5
7
0
0
6
9
5
1
51
52
20%
2
4
1
0
5
4
0
1
2
5
0
0
24
30
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
9
12
Samples Analyzed
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
2 4
4 4
1 1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
4
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
5
5
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
4
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
4
3
1.75
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
2
5
0
8
2
0
2
3
0
0
5
4
1
1
26
26
6
6
4
3
3
3
a. The percentage of total vehicles tested in each stratum that is reflected in the chemical analysis.
b. The average number of vehicles included in each chemical composite by strata. The targets were no compositing
for Strata 1, 2, 5, and 6, three vehicles for Strata 3 and 7, and five vehicles in Strata 4 and 8.
4-211
-------
Table 4-39. Summary of sample selection for chemical analysis during Round 2.
STRATUM
Week Week Ending
Vehicles Tested
1 15-Jan
2 22-Jan
3 29-Jan
4 5-Feb
5 12-Feb
6 19-Feb
7 26-Feb
8 5-Mar
9 12-Mar
10 19-Mar
11 26-Mar
12 2- Apr
13 9- Apr
Actual
Planned
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
2
9
11
2
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
5
13
9
1
0
34
42
3 4
0 4
3 6
3 1
2 6
6 8
3 10
2 3
1 2
4 5
1 0
1 2
2 2
5 13
33 62
32 56
5
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
5
1
1
4
1
0
17
18
6 7
1 3
1 6
2 7
0 4
1 6
1 5
1 5
3 1
6 2
11 2
5 2
6 1
2 0
40 44
39 43
8
7
12
0
4
4
1
2
2
2
0
0
4
2
40
38
Weekly
Total
17
28
19
19
25
20
15
14
25
31
24
18
24
279
279
Dilution
Blanks
4
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
74
68
Transit
Blanks
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13
12
Corr.
Vehicle
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
12
12
Replicate
Tests
0
1
2
2
0
2
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
10
10
Samples Selected for Chemical Analysis
1 15-Jan
2 22-Jan
3 29-Jan
4 5-Feb
5 12-Feb
6 19-Feb
7 26-Feb
8 5-Mar
9 12-Mar
10 19-Mar
11 26-Mar
12 9- Apr
Actual
Planned
% of Total (a)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
3
3
33%
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
3
9%
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 5
1 0
0 0
2 3
1 1
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 11
9 15
21% 18%
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
3
24%
0 0
0 0
1 2
0 3
0 0
0 0
1 1
2 1
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 9
4 12
13% 20%
0
0
0
4
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
9
15
23%
0
0
4
17
1
0
9
9
8
2
1
0
51
64
18%
0
0
1
4
0
0
5
5
6
2
0
0
23
30
14
12
Individual/Composites Samples Analyzed
1 15-Jan
2 22-Jan
3 29-Jan
4 5-Feb
5 12-Feb
6 19-Feb
7 26-Feb
8 5-Mar
9 12-Mar
10 19-Mar
11 26-Mar
12 9- Apr
Actual
Planned
No./Comp (b)
EPA Add-on (c)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
3
1
1
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 2
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3 3
3 3
2.33 3.67
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
3
1.33
1
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 1
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 4
4 4
1.25 2.25
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
0
0
3
6
0
0
4
6
5
1
1
0
26
26
4
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
6
6
3
58
61
a. The percentage of total vehicles tested in each stratum that is reflected in the chemical analysis.
b. The average number of vehicles included in each chemical composite by strata. The targets were no compositing
for Strata 1, 2, 5, and 6, three vehicles for Strata 3 and 7, and five vehicles in Strata 4 and 8.
c. Additional composites developed for low-flow sampling experiment.
4-212
-------
4.6.2.1 Sampling Methods
DRI installed and operated a suite of instruments and samplers to provide continuous PM
analysis and to collect batch samples of particle and gaseous exhaust components for later
analysis in accordance with the methods and procedures specified in the project QAPP. Samples
were collected from the dynamometer dilution system via two isokinetic probes, provided by
BKI, inserted prior to a 90-degree bend in the dilution tunnel. Figure 4-117 illustrates the sample
train as it was installed during the study. Heated conductive lines carried air from the probes to
the continuous instruments. Sample air was drawn from the CVS via Va" insulated copper tubing
to a small heated stainless steel chamber. The sample air exited via a PM2.5 cyclone contained in
the chamber to a heated diffusing chamber approximately 50 cm tall, containing a temperature
and RH probe. From this chamber, the sample air exited through two filter cartridges. Up to
eight cartridges could be installed in the base of the diffusing chamber, allowing four successive
pairs of filters to sample without changing cartridges. Airflow thru the cartridges was switched
by means of microprocessor controlled relays and solenoid valves, that responded to TTL line
signals from the dynamometer control. Flow rates for each filter were set to 56 1pm by adjustable
valves to give a combined flow of approximately 113 1pm as required by the inlet cyclone, and
monitored by TSI4000 flowmeters with serial data outputs. A single oil-less pump was used to
draw air through the sampler.
Filter samples were collected during each phase of the unified cycle tests. Pre-weighed
Gelman polymethylpentane ringed, 2.0 mm pore size, 47 mm diameter PTFE Teflon-membrane
Teflo filters (No. RPJ047) collected particles for measurement of gravimetric mass and elements.
Pallflex 47 mm diameter pre-fired quartz-fiber filters (No. 2500 QAT-UP) were used for water-
soluble chloride, nitrate and sulfate and for organic and elemental carbon measurements.
Samples were collected by a separate sampler for determination of parti culate and semi-volatile
organic compounds on Pallflex TX40HI20-WW 102 mm diameter Teflon-impregnated glass
fiber (TIGF) filters followed by glass cartridges containing Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. 20-
60 mesh Amberlite XAD-4 (polystyrene-divinylbenzene) adsorbent resins at a flow rate of 112
1pm. A single filter and adsorbent pair were collected for each unified cycle, combining Phases 1,
2 and 3. Sampling was suspended during the 10-minute soak period by turning off the pump.
Prior to the start of Round 1 and Round 2, all samplers were checked for leaks and the in-
line flow meters were cross-calibrated using reference flow measurement devices. Leak testing
was performed by capping the inlet lines leading to each sampler and turning on the pumps. If
the flow meter readings decreased to less than 10% of the nominal sampling flow rate in a
reasonably short time, the system was passed. If not, the leak was fixed and the test repeated.
With the exception of the Teflon/Quartz filter sampler, all units achieved near-zero flow rates
during the leak test. Due to the friable nature of the pre-fired quartz filters, it is not possible to
obtain a perfect seal in the filter holders without damaging the media, but the <10% criteria was
still met for each filter individually and for the system as a whole. In addition to the vacuum test,
the sum of flows through each of the two filter cartridges was compared to the total flow entering
the inlet and found to agree within 5%.
4-213
-------
PM2.5
CYCLONE
•TIGF FILTER
XAD
CARTRIDGE
<-Dyno
CVS
PM2.5 IMPACTORS
PHOTOACOUSTIC
(black carbon)
1.51pm
DusTrak
(light scattering)
Figure 4-117. Schematic of sampling train with flow rates.
(Heated tubing is shown as double lines.)
All flowmeters were calibrated using either a Gillibrator electronic bubble meter or a
rotameter that had been cross-calibrated with a Roots meter at DRI. Calibration flows were
measured at the inlet point of each sampler (or outlet for the canister sampler) with appropriate
sampling media installed. The resulting calibrations were used to determine the desired nominal
flow rates, and these were marked on a label on each flowmeter so that the operator could
observe any deviations during testing. Variations in nominal flow rate due to sampler problems
were recorded in a logbook. For each integrated sample, the run number, start and stop time,
elapsed time, initial and final flow rate, and any exceptional occurrences were recorded on log
sheets which were kept with the media at all times. Bar coded stickers with unique media IDs
were attached to all media and their corresponding log sheets for tracking. Immediately after the
conclusion of each test cycle, the media were repacked with the log sheets and stored in a
refrigerator, except for the canisters, which were packed and shipped via 2-day express to DRI
each day. All media were packed into coolers with ice packs and shipped overnight back to DRI
4-214
-------
where they were logged in and placed in cold storage until analysis. Media were shipped near
weekly basis. Run number, date, time, and vehicle license plate number were attached to all files
to identify the data.
The low-volume samples were collected in parallel with the higher-volume TIGF/XAD
samples collected for the main study. The high-volume flow was split into two channels, one at
103 1pm and the other at 10 1pm. Seventy-two (72) low-volume (10 1pm) samples were collected
during a contiguous three-week period at the mid-point of the main Kansas City Study from 2/15
to 3/8. These samples were collected on Teflon filters (Gelman 37 mm Teflo) using a dual stage
37 mm Teflon filter pack (EPA custom design with Vi" FNPT with quick release) using filter
holders supplied by EPA. Eight field/transport blanks were included using the same media
loading/unloading and transport procedure and tunnel blanks were collected daily.
4.6.2.2 Sample Selection for Chemical Analyses
Based upon previous studies (e.g., Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study), PM loadings were
expected to be sufficient for chemical analysis for most vehicles in the two older model year
strata. In contrast, the need for compositing was anticipated for the two new model year
categories in order to obtain adequate analytical sensitivity for organic analysis. Because the
study design called for testing the vehicles in random order, no media composites were possible
(i.e., sampling multiple vehicles on the same media). Rather an appropriate number of samples
were extracted and analyzed together for analytical methods that allow compositing prior to the
chemical analysis (e.g., elements by TCP-MS, ions by 1C, organic speciation by GC/MS,
carbonyl compounds by HPLC-UV, and volatile organics by GC-FID).
Sufficient numbers of samples were collected weekly to create composites in all
categories except for the 1996 and newer categories. Timely decisions were required to either
analyze the sample set, hold them for subsequent compositing with other samples, or remove the
sample from further consideration by either archiving the sample or, in the case of canisters, to
discard the sample and recycle the clean evacuated canister back to the field. DRI made these
decisions on a weekly basis. The target mass loading for each composite was a minimum of 1 mg
of organic carbon, which was estimated by the differences of the continuous mass measurements
(average of the QCM and DustTrak) minus the continuous BC measurements by PA. Composites
consisted of samples with similar OC to PM ratios. Some composites containing high BC to PM
ratios (i.e., black smokers) were also selected for analysis. The remaining samples not selected
for analysis were sent to EPA in Research Triangle Park to be archived.
All field and tunnel blanks and samples for replicate and calibration vehicle test were
analyzed for gravimetric mass and OC and EC. Complete speciation was obtained for dilution
tunnel blanks, field/transport blanks and for subsets of vehicle test samples from each round. The
test samples were selected for chemical analysis and grouped into composites according to the
protocol developed in consultation with EPA. A total of 26 individual/composite chemical
profiles were obtained from 51 of 254 vehicles tested in Round 1 and another 26 composites
from 51 of 230 vehicles tested in Round 2 (excludes repeat vehicles from Round 1). Tables 4-40
and 4-41 lists the samples selected for chemical analysis in Rounds 1 and 2, respectively.
Dilution tunnel blanks were also combined into several composites as shown in Table 4-42. The
composites are identified according to the following convention: Xa-b, where X= season/round
4-215
-------
(S for summer/Round 1 and W for winter /Round 2); a is the stratum (1 through 8) and 0 for
tunnel blank composites; and b is the composite number within each stratum. The test samples
for the later model-year strata (3, 4, 7 and 8) were analyzed as composites of multiple samples.
The samples within each composite were extracted together or otherwise combined prior to the
chemical analysis (e.g., elements by TCP-MS, ions by 1C, organic speciation by GC/MS,
carbonyl compounds by HPLC-UV, and volatile organics by GC-FID). Samples for the older
vehicle strata (1, 2, 5, and 6) were analyzed without compositing. The odometer readings shown
in Tables 4-40 and 4-41 are uncorrected for odometer malfunctions or turnovers.
4.6.2.3 Analytical Methods
The relevant analytical methods and procedures are described in the project QAPP and
references cited therein. Selected Teflon filters were analyzed by a combination of XRF (40
elements) using DRI protocol A (Watson et al., 1999) and ICP-MS (Pb, Hg, As, Cr, Cu, Zn and
Mn). Following gravimetric mass and XRF analysis of the Teflon filters for the separate phases
of the LA92 test cycle, the three filters were extracted together and the composite sample
analyzed by ICP-MS. Selected quartz filter were analyzed for OC/EC by thermal optical
reflectance (TOR) method using the IMPROVE (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual
Environment) temperature/oxygen cycle (IMPROVE-TOR) (Chow et al., 1993; Chow et al.,
2001). It should be noted that because EC and OC are operationally defined, the specific
instrument used and details of its operation and choice of thermal evolution protocol can
influence the split between EC and OC (Watson et al. 2005). Each half of the quartz filter for the
three phases of the LA92 test cycle was extracted together and analyzed for chloride, nitrate, and
sulfate by ion chromatography. No cations analysis was budgeted for this project.
The TIGF/XAD samples were extracted and analyzed together for the two older model
year groups (pre-1980 and 1980-1990). TIGF and XAD extracts were analyzed separately for
the two newer model year groups (1991-1995 and 1996 and newer) and for the tunnel and
field/transport blanks. Samples selected for analysis were extracted and the extracts combined
according to the composite decisions. The extracts were analyzed on a Varian 1200 triple
quadruple gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS/MS) system or a Varian coupled to a
Saturn 2000 ion trap mass spectrometer system with MS/MS and chemical ionization
capabilities. Species identification and quantitation include 95 semi-volatile and particulate PAH,
19 hopanes, 18 steranes, 49 alkanes, 99 polar organic compounds, and 25 nitro-PAH. Method
detection limits are 0.01-0.03 ng/|j,l for PAH, hopanes and steranes, and alkane compounds, and
0.03-0.04 ng/|j,l for polar compounds.
4-216
-------
Table 4-40. Vehicle test samples selected for chemical analysis in Round 1 and
composite identification.
Sample
Composite
Sl-1
Sl-2
S2-1
S2-2
S2-3
S2-4
S3-1
S3-1
S3-1
S3-2
S3-2
S3-2
S4-1
S4-1
S4-1
S4-2
S4-2
S4-2
S4-2
S4-2
S5-1
S5-2
S5-3
S5-4
S5-5
S6-1
S6-2
S6-3
S6-4
S7-1
S7-1
S7-2
S7-2
S7-2
S7-3
S7-4
S8-1
S8-1
S8-1
S8-1
S8-1
S8-2
S8-2
S8-2
S8-2
S8-2
S8-3
S8-3
S8-3
S8-3
S8-3
Run#
84037
84154
84048
84201
84263
84283
84066
84067
84073
84278
84281
84287
84034
84055
84072
84337
84339
84343
84344
84349
84076
84188
84271
84277
84367
84071
84079
84180
84270
84101
84108
84157
84165
84174
84308
84258
84042
84060
84062
84063
84078
84178
84183
84184
84185
84191
84279
84297
84303
84304
84310
Sample
Date
7/15
8/10
7/19
8/21
9/9
9/13
7/22
7/22
7/24
9/11
9/13
9/14
7/14
7/20
7/24
9/23
9/23
9/24
9/24
9/25
7/24
8/18
9/10
9/11
9/28
7/23
7/26
8/16
9/10
7/30
7/31
8/11
8/12
8/14
9/17
9/8
7/17
7/21
7/22
7/22
7/26
8/16
8/17
8/17
8/17
8/19
9/13
9/16
9/17
9/17
9/18
Time Model Year
10:50
15:21
11:00
9:42
10:57
13:48
14:08
15:44
10:09
15:22
11:15
11:02
14:16
15:36
8:34
8:08
10:34
8:23
9:43
8:11
14:28
9:40
14:41
13:45
16:11
12:42
11:08
10:39
13:21
13:22
14:59
10:54
15:05
9:37
14:36
8:46
9:20
14:06
8:19
9:47
9:34
8:12
8:12
9:37
10:56
8:13
8:39
9:45
8:05
9:24
8:02
1979
1979
1989
1985
1989
1985
1995
1995
1995
1990
1995
1995
1999
1998
2003
2003
1999
2004
2000
2003
1968
1977
1979
1978
1980
1989
1989
1985
1986
1994
1991
1994
1991
1994
1994
1991
1996
1998
1998
1996
1997
1997
2000
2000
1996
2000
2001
1996
2002
2001
2003
Make
Ford
Ford
Dodge
Chevrolet
Dodge
Dodge
Jeep
Dodge
Chevrolet
GMC
Chevy
GMC
Isuzu
Jeep
Chevrolet
Ford
Plymouth
KIA
Toyota
Chevy
Ford
Chevrolet
Buick
MG
Mercedes
Pontiac
Honda
Pontiac
Mercury
Toyota
Honda
Nissan
Mazda
Mercury
Pontiac
Olds
Honda
Buick
Buick
Saturn
Honda
Toyota
Toyota
Honda
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Dodge
Olds
Honda
Chevy
Model Vehicle Type Odometer Stratum
F250
F150
Caravan
S10
Ram
Ram
Wrangler
Caravan
S 10 Blazer
Jimmy
Suburban
Sierra
Trooper
Cherokee
S10 Pickup
Ranger
Voyager
Sedona
Sienna
Tracker
Mustang
Monte Carlo
LeSabre
MGB
450SEL
Grand Am
Accord
Bonneville
Grand Marquis
Camry
Civic
Sentra
Protege
Topaz
GrandAM
Delta
Civic
LeSabre
LeSabre
0
Accord LX
Camry
Corolla
Civic
Corolla
Camry
Camry
Stratus
Silhouette
Civic
Venture
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
102264
53493
161017
30295
132325
47582
74158
113890
100758
130254
73848
171370
63375
131875
19366
11678
75489
na
na
na
98852
135545
37608
42926
na
116806
209972
236759
36277
169034
214131
127045
185565
32686
101526
226269
131483
45444
45444
74620
79584
129415
70118
40402
148857
47771
61415
146579
40271
49751
24915
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
4-217
-------
Table 4-41. Vehicle test samples selected for chemical analysis in Round 2 and
composite identification.
Analysis
Code
Wl-1
Wl-2
Wl-3
W2-1
W2-2
W2-3
W2-E
W3-1
W3-1
W3-1
W3-2
W3-2
W3-2
W3-3
W3-E
W4-1
W4-1
W4-1
W4-1
W4-1
W4-2
W4-2
W4-2
W4-3
W4-3
W4-3
W5-1
W5-1
W5-2
W5-3
W5-E
W6-1
W6-2
W6-3
W6-3
W6-4
W6-E
W7-1
W7-1
W7-2
W7-2
W7-2
W7-3
W7-3
W7-4
W7-4
W8-1
W8-1
W8-1
W8-1
W8-2
W8-2
W8-3
W8-3
W8-3
Run#
84653
84687
84700
84462
84489
84634
84632
84487
84497
84510
84584
84591
84600
84618
84621
84479
84493
84495
84498
84500
84577
84580
84616
84587
84608
84617
84482
84484
84601
84605
84637
84474
84582
84611
84613
84635
84630
84453
84455
84485
84499
84505
84581
84597
84639
84645
84483
84502
84503
84504
84596
84599
84589
84593
84622
Sample
Date
3/14
3/19
3/22
1/26
2/2
3/10
3/9
2/1
2/3
2/7
2/24
2/26
3/1
3/7
3/7
1/31
2/3
2/3
2/4
2/4
2/22
2/23
3/7
2/25
3/4
3/7
1/31
2/1
3/1
3/3
3/10
1/29
2/23
3/4
3/5
3/10
3/9
1/25
1/25
2/1
2/4
2/5
2/23
2/28
3/11
3/12
2/1
2/4
2/5
2/5
2/28
3/1
2/25
2/26
3/8
Time
13:21
15:16
14:06
14:26
9:33
9:27
13:33
13:40
13:44
10:55
8:18
8:13
9:27
10:39
14:11
9:22
8:38
11:13
8:24
10:58
8:20
8:21
8:07
8:56
8:10
9:25
13:32
9:25
10:41
10:15
13:07
9:35
11:14
11:49
9:24
10:36
10:38
10:59
13:15
11:03
9:43
10:53
9:44
11:10
9:19
9:15
8:11
13:41
8:19
9:37
9:50
8:11
11:28
10:45
8:00
Model Year
1977
1976
1978
1989
1987
1988
1987
1992
1995
1994
1995
1993
1993
1992
1992
1996
2004
1996
2001
1998
1998
2002
1999
1996
1996
1997
1979
1979
1979
1977
1980
1988
1988
1989
1990
1989
1989
1995
1995
1991
1995
1993
1995
1994
1995
1993
1996
1996
2002
2000
1997
1998
2001
1998
1999
Model
C-20 Pu
El Camino
Pu
Voyager
Pu
Voyager
FISOPu
B2200
4 Runner
Suburban
Pu
4Runner
Explorer
Voyager
Ranger
Caravan
Freestar Minivan
Sonoma Pu
Sienna Minivan
Frontier Pu
Aerostar
Town & Country
Voyager
Villager
Quest
Suburban
Lasabre
Lesabre
Regal
280Z
Cutlass Supreme
Civic
528E
Camry
Delta 88
Crown Vic
Accord
Maxima
Mustang
Fleetwood
Integra
Intrepid
Corsica
Sunbird
Cavalier
960
Neon
Concorde
Taurus
Concorde
Taurus
Avalon
Sedan
Accord
Camry
Vehicle
Type
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
truck
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
car
Odometer
37697
61809
73447
145307
232098
162874
428
101090
85898
187410
86705
178462
47980
154297
13586
118369
14714
51863
59734
112521
0
84580
113389
166799
125651
145147
40364
40385
5864
94782
79420
207265
287806
168091
185694
62847
139963
181395
146289
97124
80579
210298
78767
145869
140500
197094
79848
111502
26406
65330
97601
29575
56662
75067
64134
Stratum
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Note: Identifications ending in "E" are additional composites samples analyzed for the low-flow sampler
comparisons.
4-218
-------
Table 4-42. Chemical speciation composites of dilution blanks.
Summer/Round 1
Composite ID Run # Date
SO-1
SO-1
SO-1
SO-1
SO-1
SO-2
SO-2
SO-3
SO-3
SO-3
SO-3
SO-3
SO-4
SO-4
SO-4
SO-4
SO-5
SO-5
SO-5
SO-6
SO-6
SO-6
SO-6
SO-6
84038
84044
84059
84065
84075
84049
84080
84147
84152
84158
84170
84176
84181
84186
84194
84199
84255
84260
84275
84282
84288
84294
84306
84313
7/15
7/17
7/21
7/22
7/24
7/19
7/26
8/9
8/10
8/11
8/13
8/14
8/16
8/17
8/19
8/20
9/2
9/8
9/11
9/13
9/14
9/15
9/17
9/18
Time
12:32
12:02
12:12
12:23
12:52
11:34
12:20
11:54
12:11
12:04
12:03
11:58
11:55
12:19
12:11
11:12
11:58
11:12
0:00
12:22
12:08
11:56
11:48
11:47
Composite
ID
WO-1
WO-1
WO-1
WO-1
WO-1
WO-2
WO-2
WO-3
WO-3
WO-3
WO-3
WO-4
WO-4
WO-4
WO-4
WO-5
WO-5
WO-5
WO-5
WO-6
WO-6
WO-6
WO-6
Winter/Round2
Run # Date
84454
84481
84486
84501
84506
84579
84607
84586
84590
84594
84604
84583
84602
84610
84615
84619
84625
84631
84636
84641
84647
84652
84657
1/25
1/31
2/1
2/4
2/5
2/22
3/3
2/24
2/25
2/26
3/2
2/23
3/1
3/4
3/5
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/14
3/15
Time
11:36
11:51
12:09
12:05
12:01
10:42
12:42
10:41
12:42
11:52
9:42
12:21
11:50
10:31
11:51
11:45
11:47
11:54
11:42
11:36
11:36
11:49
11:31
4-219
-------
Each sample is reported initially in terms of mass per sample (jig/sample). Ambient
concentrations in terms of mass per volume (i.e., ng/m3 or other units if requested) are reported
based upon the sample volume adjusted for ambient temperature and pressure, or reported as
"standard" volume. The measurement uncertainties associated with each individual compound
are reported as the combined root mean square of the replicate precision for analytical
uncertainty, which is defined by the following equation:
y (replicate precision * analyteconcentration)2 + (analytedetection limit)2
This equation incorporates the analyte detection limit for each compound so when
concentrations approach zero, the error is reported as the analyte detection limit.
4.6.2.4 Field Blank Subtraction
Analytical results for composite field blanks were divided by the number of media
combined for each analysis and the results in |j,g/sample were compared to each other for
consistency. Any obvious outliers were compared to dilution tunnel blanks and exhaust samples
for indications of contamination. If outliers appear to be contaminated or substantially different
in composition relative to the other field blanks, they were removed from the field blank set. All
remaining field blank results are summed and divided by the total number of media represented.
n
where n is the total number of field blank media used in average, Nj is the number of field
blank media combined in analysis/ and Mj is the measured mass in |j,g for analysis/
For each composite exhaust sample or dilution tunnel blank, the average field blank mass
is multiplied by the number of media combined in the exhaust or dilution sample composite and
subtracted from the composite sample mass, Mc.
If the result is negative for a species, the composite mass Ms is set to zero for that species.
In cases where backup media were sampled and analyzed separately from the primary filter, as
for some of the TIGF filters and XAD adsorbent cartridges, blank subtraction is performed
before combining the primary and backup media analysis results, using the field blanks of
corresponding type.
The uncertainty of the field blank subtracted mass is calculated as:
4-220
-------
where Um = the analytical uncertainty of the composite sample mass, in |j,g and S/b is the
standard deviation of the field blanks, weighted by number of media combined in each field
blank analysis.
In^NM,2 -(YJN,M,J
o _ I Z^ii J J V-^ii J II
ft -\\ 7 :
" n(n -
4.6.2.5 Calculation of Composite Speciated Profiles
For a composite profile consisting of/' sample analyses (each analysis may represent 1 to
5 vehicle tests or dilution tunnel blanks), the mean concentration in |j,g /m3 of species x for
composite s is calculated as:
Z
where M* = mass of species x on filter /', corrected for the mean field blank value, in |j,g,
and Vi = sample volume for filter /', in m3.
The uncertainty of the composite concentration is:
= c:
\2
nf '
where m* = uncertainty of the mass of species x on filter /', corrected for the mean field
blank value, in |j,g and v. = uncertainty of the sample volume for filter /', in m3. Uncertainties for
DRI sample volumes were estimated as 5% of measured value, based on the results of periodic
flow audits. No uncertainties for the CVS volume or mileage were reported, but these are
assumed to be small relative to the analytical errors. This method was used in order to be
consistent with the sample compositing for speciated organic analysis, in which filter extracts for
each composite group were combined before analysis. Analytical and volumetric uncertainties
are propagated throughout the calculation to provide an overall uncertainty for each
concentration and emission rate.
The composite emission rate in mg/mi of species x for composite s is calculated as:
0.001^^ ' CX=EX
jug) Yd S S
Z-ii t
4-221
-------
where A = CVS total diluted volume (Vm;x) for sample /', in m3 and d, = total mileage driven
during sample /', in miles. Analytical and volumetric uncertainties* are propagated throughout the
calculation to provide an overall uncertainty for each emission rate.
4.6.3 Results and Conclusions
Full chemical speciation was determined for 26 individual/composite samples and 6
composite dilution tunnel blanks samples in each test round. Tables 4-40 and 4-41 list the vehicle
exhaust samples that were combined together for chemical analysis in Rounds 1 and 2,
respectively, and Table 4-42 lists the dilution tunnel blanks that were combined into composites.
All data are field-blank corrected. Appendix A shows the range (minimum, maximum, and the
10th, 50th, and 90th percentile) of concentrations for each chemical species normalized to either
the mean field blank or minimum detection limit, whichever is larger. This table shows that the
chemical data that were obtained in Round 1 are well above the analytical sensitivities for most
species. The chemical composition data for dilution tunnel blanks and exhaust samples are
presented in Appendix B. The summaries of the PM data for composite exhaust and dilution
blank samples in Tables 4-43 and 4-44 for Rounds 1 and 2, respectively, show that emissions
levels are well above the ranges of values for dilution tunnel blanks with the exception of
hopanes and steranes emissions for the newer model-year strata. Summary data include
gravimetric mass, OC, and EC are in mg/mile and PAH, hopanes, and steranes are in ug/mile.
The three PAHs that are potential markers for gasoline exhaust are indeno[123-cd]pyrene,
benzo(ghi)perylene and coronene.
Comparisons of co-pollutants can provide validation checks for assessing the overall
accuracy and validity of the measurements. Species emitted from the same source type should
correlate and exhibit average ratios of species that reflect the nature of the source. Figure 4-118
shows gravimetric mass versus total carbon by EVIPROVE-TOR in ug/m of diluted exhaust for
Round 1 dynamometer test filters by test phase. PM mass and TC are strongly correlated for the
phase 1 samples and poorly correlated for the lightly loaded phase 3 samples. Similar results are
shown in Figure 4-119 for the correlation of elemental carbon by TOR versus average BC by the
photoacoustic instrument. As we have seen in prior studies (e.g., Gasoline/Diesel PM Split
Study) for highly loaded samples, PM mass is typically well correlated with TC and EC obtained
by EVIPROVE-TOR or STN-TOT agree with photoacoustic BC. That is not the case at lower
sample loading where sampling artifacts associated with adsorbed organic compounds on the
quartz filter may be relatively more important. The correlations of the sum of elements by XRF
analysis (Figure 4-120) show the similar correlations to PM mass as TC, which again reflects the
lower mass loadings for the phase 3 samples. Figure 4-121 shows that sulfur by XRF analysis is
strongly correlated to sulfate by ion chromatography. Figure 4-122 shows that
benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno[123-cd]pyrene and coronene all correlate well with TC emissions
and Figure 4-123 shows that the sum of hopanes and steranes also correlated well with TC.
Figures 4-124 through 4-143 show the abundances of various chemical species in the
dilution blank and composite exhaust samples during each round of testing. OC and EC are the
most abundant species in motor vehicle exhaust, accounting for over 95% of the total PM mass.
For SI vehicles, BC and PM emission rates can be several times larger during the cold start phase
than during hot stabilized operation. Relatively clean SI vehicles produce BC emissions during
the more aggressive portions of the driving cycle and during cold starts. Therefore, the emission
4-222
-------
profiles for clean SI vehicles from dynamometer tests may contain higher fractions of EC than
would be produced in congested urban driving conditions. PM emissions from SI high-emitter
contain predominantly OC. Variability of emissions from a vehicle may be as great as the
difference between vehicles, particularly for the high emitters. The abundances of individual
organic species relative to total mass or carbon are consistent from profile to profile for organic
and elemental carbon, PAH, Hopanes, steranes, and nitroPAH. Alkanes and polars appear too
variable to be useful for receptor modeling. Gasoline vehicles, whether low or high emitters,
emit higher proportions of high molecular-weight particulate PAHs (e.g.,
benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, and coronene). Hopanes
and steranes are markers for lubricating oil from internal combustion engines and their emission
rates were highest for high emitting vehicles.
4-223
-------
Table 4-43. Summary of PM data for Round 1 composite exhaust samples1.
Composites
PM
Mass
OC
EC
EC/TC
PAH gas
markers
Sum of
Hopanes
Sum of
Steranes
Dilution Tunnel Blanks
SO-1
SO-2
SO-3
SO-4
SO-5
SO-6
Trucks
Sl-1
Sl-2
S2-1
S2-2
S2-3
S2-4
S3-1
S3-2
S4-1
S4-2
Cars
S5-1
S5-2
S5-3
S5-4
S5-5
S6-1
S6-2
S6-3
S6-4
S7-1
S7-2
S7-3
S7-4
S8-1
S8-2
S8-3
0.39
0.53
0.19
0.24
0.95
0.70
9.13
81.73
73.07
20.11
22.02
76.16
3.76
22.36
3.31
2.12
18.14
60.91
9.46
207.43
99.63
41.62
49.04
10.10
22.84
7.66
8.81
4.12
4.78
1.81
2.08
3.48
0.256
0.129
0.268
0.293
0.940
0.588
2.204
26.070
59.132
11.332
16.212
28.193
1.097
8.186
1.438
1.801
9.029
46.521
7.177
101.649
33.934
35.609
9.079
3.738
13.998
3.856
5.258
1.666
1.155
0.983
1.488
2.346
0.154
0.020
0.031
0.030
0.235
0.142
1.516
17.884
4.510
6.588
4.030
25.780
0.933
5.641
0.582
1.178
9.929
9.412
2.549
77.566
50.871
0.639
36.603
4.739
2.682
2.316
1.808
0.994
1.537
0.544
0.906
1.339
0.38
0.13
0.10
0.09
0.20
0.19
0.41
0.41
0.07
0.37
0.20
0.48
0.46
0.41
0.29
0.40
0.52
0.17
0.26
0.43
0.60
0.02
0.80
0.56
0.16
0.38
0.26
0.37
0.57
0.36
0.38
0.36
0.00
0.16
0.04
0.00
0.19
0.18
12.07
373.42
13.09
113.03
30.93
254.90
1.43
39.02
1.15
2.28
128.83
263.07
4.62
1031.44
480.44
4.01
345.07
19.03
24.25
8.04
13.08
11.97
7.54
0.34
2.22
2.27
0.73
0.73
1.17
0.73
2.16
2.42
1.56
31.36
164.02
8.32
59.78
36.02
0.91
22.74
1.30
2.82
120.60
292.58
29.35
405.41
175.76
52.49
16.52
5.24
26.04
10.84
25.45
11.46
7.80
1.01
3.52
3.45
0.45
0.48
0.48
0.35
1.09
1.90
0.03
5.79
44.50
3.52
48.31
14.42
0.76
6.07
0.48
1.73
0.00
63.74
5.18
63.62
46.40
12.35
6.04
0.67
8.70
7.25
8.62
0.45
0.36
0.57
1.19
1.29
1 Gravimetric mass, OC, and EC are in mg/mile and PAH, hopanes, and steranes are in ug/mile. The three PAHs that
are potential markers for gasoline exhaust are indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene, and coronene.
4-224
-------
Table 4-44. Summary of PM data for Round 2 composite exhaust samples1.
Composites
PM2.5
Mass
Organic Elemental
Carbon Carbon
EC/TC
ratio
PAH gas
markers
Sum of Sum of
Hopanes Steranes
Dilution Tunnel Blanks
WO-1
WO-2
WO-3
WO-4
WO-5
WO-6
Trucks
Wl-1
Wl-2
Wl-3
W2-1
W2-2
W3-1
W3-2
W3-3
W4-1
W2-3
W4-2
W4-3
Cars
W5-1
W5-2
W5-3
W6-1
W6-2
W6-3
W6-4
W7-1
W7-2
W7-3
W7-4
W8-1
W8-2
W8-3
0.85
0.27
0.50
0.39
0.90
0.45
113.12
43.21
59.60
52.30
15.30
5.98
29.38
23.57
15.21
6.89
6.02
11.65
16.82
47.47
45.26
56.31
17.14
9.97
73.13
5.08
12.44
3.45
4.65
4.21
8.46
27.78
0.68
0.66
0.65
0.71
0.90
0.70
74.96
31.26
34.09
25.69
4.79
2.50
10.21
7.94
5.11
2.09
2.56
5.30
8.54
16.45
15.57
32.13
7.33
5.00
49.20
2.70
6.68
2.69
2.58
2.60
2.95
2.52
0.14
0.03
0.16
0.08
0.17
0.10
14.09
10.01
11.59
22.84
3.58
2.66
16.25
9.00
4.23
3.35
3.07
5.24
7.39
28.13
15.66
20.39
9.59
3.22
4.27
2.82
3.84
1.29
1.49
1.50
4.53
3.34
0.17
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.16
0.13
0.16
0.24
0.25
0.47
0.43
0.52
0.61
0.53
0.45
0.62
0.55
0.50
0.46
0.63
0.50
0.39
0.57
0.39
0.08
0.51
0.36
0.32
0.37
0.37
0.61
0.57
0.31
0.00
0.09
0.13
0.07
0.09
364.44
87.72
251.27
319.34
7.14
128.18
71.84
21.35
16.23
9.79
19.08
26.19
14.78
170.79
252.19
206.65
24.79
18.07
51.57
10.43
34.37
8.52
11.31
9.40
14.39
18.11
0.97
0.29
0.44
0.49
0.65
0.48
290.43
93.86
66.64
173.27
15.00
23.96
12.80
12.01
3.01
1.98
1.90
7.96
6.85
12.92
18.94
170.82
5.72
7.69
216.55
1.17
6.43
3.05
0.75
2.06
2.13
2.06
0.31
0.20
0.13
0.18
0.13
0.25
80.48
5.61
8.49
15.77
2.74
1.63
2.54
1.29
0.13
0.71
0.92
0.87
0.57
1.84
11.78
50.03
3.35
4.02
98.98
0.34
2.23
1.75
0.46
1.08
1.47
0.52
1 Gravimetric mass, OC, and EC are in mg/mile and PAH, hopanes, and steranes are in ug/mile. The three PAHs that
are potential markers for gasoline exhaust are indeno[123-cd]pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene, and coronene.
4-225
-------
7000
ra
'o
y = 0.93x + 23.02
R2 = 0.98
y = 0.65x + 33.48
R2 = 0.84
y = 0.34x + 71.37
R2 = 0.35
• PHASE 1
• PHASE 2
A PHASE 3
Linear (PHASE 1)
• - -Linear (PHASE 2)
• — Linear (PHASE 3)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
gravimetric mass
Figure 4-118. Gravimetric mass versus total carbon by TOR
For all dynamometer test filters, separated by test phase. Concentrations are in ug/m3 of
diluted exhaust.
4-226
-------
5000
_ 4000 4-
o
o
ro
f 3000 ^
Q.
o
CQ 2000 -
1000 4-
y=1.05x-25.42
R2 = 0.97
y=1.17x-33.18
R2 = 0.97
y = 0.63x + 25.23
R2 = 0.27
1000
2000 3000
EC by TOR
4000 5000
• PHASE 1
• PHASE 2
A PHASE 3
Linear (PHASE 1)
• - -Linear (PHASE 2)
• — Linear (PHASE 3)
Figure 4-119. Elemental Carbon by TOR versus average BC by photoacoustic
method
For all dynamometer tests, separated by test phase. Concentrations are in ug/m3 of
diluted exhaust.
4-227
-------
7000
y = 0.95x - 9.36
R2 = 0.98
y = 0.79x + 6.28
R2 = 0.93
&
**
'
•
^^
A
^ y = 0.37x + 64.11
R - 0.39
• PHASE 1
• PHASE 2
A PHASE 3
Linear (PHASE 1)
• - -Linear (PHASE 2)
• — Linear (PHASE 3)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
gravimetric mass
Figure 4-120. Gravimetric mass versus sum of XRF elements and total carbon by
TOR
For all dynamometer tests, separated by test phase. Concentrations are in ug/m3 of
diluted exhaust.
4-228
-------
50 100 150 200 250
S04 by 1C (ug/m3)
300
350
Figure 4-121. Sulfur by XRF *3 versus Sulfate by 1C for all exhaust composites.
The inset shows the data without the significant outlier at SO4=330 ug/m3.
Concentrations are in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust.
4-229
-------
E
700
600
500
400
< 300
Q.
o corone
n bghipe
A in123pyr
Linear (bghipe)
Linear (corone)
Linear (in123pyr)
y = 3.18x
R2 = 0.85
50 100 150
total carbon by TOR (mg/mi)
200
Figure 4-122. Total organic carbon by TOR versus indeno[123-cd]pyrene,
benzo(ghi)perylene and coronene in mg/mile.
su
m
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
total organic carbon
Figure 4-123. Total organic carbon by TOR versus sum of hopanes and steranes
for exhaust composites.
Concentrations are in ug/m3 of diluted exhaust.
4-230
-------
DAI DSi DP DS BCI DK DCa DTi DVa DCr HMn BFe DCo DNi DCu HZn
o
u
.a
n
o
+•»
—
o
- CNI CO
incbcbcbcbi^i^i^r^oooooo
wwwwwwwwww
D Ga D As D Se • Br • Rb D Sr • Yt D Zr D Mo • Pd • Ag • Cd • In D Sn D Sb
D Ba D La D Au D Hg D Tl D Pb • Ur
1.00 n
0.00
i-j- C\l CO -3- un CO i-j
oooooo^T^c\ic\ic\ic\icoco-^--^-LnLn
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Figure 4-124. Abundances of elements and ions from XRF and 1C analysis of all
exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1.
4-231
-------
1AI DSi DP DS BCI DK DCa DTi DVa DCr DMn DFe DCo DNi DCu BZn
1.00 i
g 0.80 -
c
ns
M'n:
.a
ns
0.60 -
0.40 -
>
J2
£ 0.20 -
0.00
Q
P
Illllliiiiiiiiillliiilllliiiilll
DGa HAs DSe BBr BRb DSr BYt DZr DMo BPd BAg BCd Bin DSn DSb
DBa DLa DAu DHg DTI DPb BUr
1.00 nr-lMl-l
Figure 4-125. Abundances of elements and ions from XRF and 1C analysis of all
exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 2.
4-232
-------
zuu
180
160
i 140
O)
~ 120
o>
2 100
•§ 80
(/>
g 60
HI
40
20
0
75
r\l
0
CO
ro
CO
•fl-
J5
o
J5
O
co
Tunnel
blanks
J5
n
i
1
-1
•N
J5
.
—
_
CN
CO
_
-
r\i
CM
CO
_
N
n
D
H
i|
^
N
75
ro
CO
=
N
Y)
75
75
CNI
•3-
co
Trucks
-
•
J5
_
-
CO
R
00
75 to
n
1
f[
L
o<-
.on
75 to
—
=
N
D
/5
j=j
•o
D
n
„
-
*t
£>
75
75
•N
J5
ro
/5
^
/5
DO
J5
r\i
00
CO
-o
DO
75
Cars
• 01
• 02
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 0
1
—
I
-
,-
o
CO
—
-
N
D
75
[
"O
7;
f
V.
—
-
.0
D
75
-
_
_
—
?
D
75
Tunnel
blanks
-
I
-
-
<-
75
T
-
-
CN
CO
-
—
,-
N
75
-
_
N
io
-
-
ro
X
-
-
-
^
CN
CO
—
—
<-
io
_
-
-
-
N
•o
75
-
=
,-
=T
-
-
-
-
CN
75
-
_
<-
n
75
-
N
C
-
[
_
—
ro
CD
CO
-
-
-
•3-
D
75
-
—
<-
75
-
~
-
-
:N
75
-
_
_
ro
CO
r
L
-
—
T
75
L
—
-
<-
»
75
_
-
-
N
y;
—
—
ro
00
CO
Cars
Figure 4-126. Abundances of carbon fractions from IMPROVE-TOR analysis of all exhaust and dilution blank
composites during Round 1.
The error bars indicate the pyrolysis correction to OC.
-------
to
OJ
IUU
90
:=> 80
E
B) 70
^ 60
2 50
I 40
to
1 30
LU
20
10
0
i
>
6
>•
0
>
*t
0
.0
~>
»
»
Tunnel
blanks
1
II
1
:N
^
-
-
ro t
> :
>c
-
i
-N
SIN
-
-
>
>
-
>
>
-
"O
"O
>
>
H
4
>
^
ro
g
§
•\l
4
I
=
"O
4
>
Trucks
-
r>
>
>
—
-
-
M
>
>
n
j
-
ro
r>
>
>
-
£>
>
-
>
1
_
Y)
>
-
D
>
p
5
=
•\l
>
>
„
ro
>
>
<^-
>
>
H
00
R
DO
-
x>
Cars
• 01 n02
•
1.U
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
—
-
1
>
-
M
1
I
:
"O
1
^
—
>^-
>
>
-
1
-
.0
>
>
-
CD
0
>
Tunnel
blanks
-
-
>
>
f
C\l
i
-
ro
i
-
-
i
T
-
CM
i
-
-
r>
>
>
"
M
Y)
>
>
Hi
-
ro
ro
>
-
-
-
4
>
-
T
-
ro
-
-
CN
-
-
-
Y)
4
>
Trucks
03 D04 nE1 DE2 BE3
-
—
i
_
-
.0
>
>
-
-
Y)
>
>
-
_
-
-
O
-
-
.
I
^
-
"O
i
-
-
CD
>
_
-
-
>
>
-
-
-
CXI
§
-
-
_
ro
>
>
•
-
-
-
<^-
>
>
-
x>
>
1
-
-
Mro
II
Cars
Figure 4-127. Abundance of carbon fractions from IMPROVE-TOR analysis of all exhaust and dilution blank
composites during Round 2.
The error bars indicate the pyrolysis correction to OC.
-------
to
Emissions of Particle-Phase PAHs (mg/m )
t.u -
•a n _
> (mg/mile)
J C
3 C
Emission:
->• r>
3 C
On
n
co
=
CM
CO
_•_•_
CM
CO
CM
CM
CO
CO
CM
CO
fru
'
CM
CO
ck
H
CO
CO
s
CM
CO
CO
CO
CM
CO
R
10
CO
=
CM
• 26 other PAHs
D benzo(ghi)perylene
CO
IO
CO
-
:
10
CO
n
1 p
1=1 n I h — n i— i
cocococococococococococo
Cars
n indeno[123-cd]pyrene
• coronene
Particle-Phase PAH (% Total)
100%
c
0)
E
0)
0.
75% -
50%
25%
0%
OT
Li
OT
OJ
OT
Trucks
OT
OT
OT
OT
OT
OJ
Cars
U)
D 26 other PAHs
D benzo(ghi)perylene
n indeno[123-cd]pyrene
• coronene
Figure 4-128. Abundances of benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno[123-cd]pyrene, coronene and sum of 26 other
particulate PAH for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1.
-------
Emissions of Particle-Phase PAHs (mg/m )
Particle-Phase PAH (% Total)
to
OJ
ON
— o.U
1
^>
^
*A on
nission;
->• N
3 C
u '•"
n n
[_jj_|_ j||_____
Trucks Cars
• 26 other PAHs n indeno[1 23-cd]pyrene
n benzo(ghi)perylene • coronene
C
0)
0)
0.
UU70
75% -
50% -
25% -
0% -
- - -
- - -
Trucks
• 26 other PAHs
n benzo(gh)pery
--------
--------
Cars
nindeno[123-cd
ene • coronene
-
-
iiiii
pyrene
Figure 4-129. Abundances of benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno[123-cd]pyrene, coronene and sum of 26 other
particulate PAH for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 2.
-------
to
GOUU
3000-
2500-
2000-
1500-
1000-
500-
o-
Emissions (ug/mi)
5
OT
3
OT
CO
ci
OT
s
OT
73
OT
Tunnel
Blanks
OT
1
!
OT
W
i
OJ
w
g
an
cow
OTOT
S
OT
m
V)
i
1
^
OT
Trucks
an
S3
wlco
CO
•J)
•
i -fl
g |
OTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOTOT
Cars
100% i
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Tunnel
Blanks
Trucks
i
iolco
Cars
• Benzo(c)phenanthrene
D Benz(a)anthracene
D Benzanthrone
• Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione
D Benzo(a)fluoranthene
• Perylene
D Dibenzo(aj)anthracene
D Benzo(b)chrysene
DAnthanthrene
D Coronene
D Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene
• Triphenylene
D 7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
• 5+6-methylchrysene
DBeP
D 7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
D lndeno[123-cd]pyrene
D Picene
D Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene
• Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene
• Chrysene
• 3-methylchrysene
• Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
DBaP
D 9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
D Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
• Benzo(ghi)perylene
D Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Figure 4-130. Abundances of particulate PAHs for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1.
-------
to
OJ
00
1000 -
800
600
400
200
Emissions (ug/m
^_
1
n
CM
1
CO
1
-3-
1
l£>
1
CD
1
Tunnel
Blanks
~
=
~
!
-
_
^_
i
=
|
-
CM
>
]
~
-
-
CO
>
B
CM
i
=
~
i
i
CO
CN
>
=
1
i
^_
i
|
CM
i
Trucks
i
CO
i
g
^_
1
1
CM
3
CO
1
_
5
^_
i
-
!
CM
i
= n
P
•P
0D
BB
nn B
DlililBBBll
COt-CMCO-^t-CMCO-^t-CMCO
Cars
HI
CM CO
6 6
Tunnel
Blanks
Trucks
Cars
• Benzo(c)phenanthrene
D Benz(a)anthracene
D Benzanthrone
• Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione
D Benzo(a)fluoranthene
• Perylene
D Dibenzo(a j)anthracene
D Benzo(b)chrysene
DAnthanthrene
DCoronene
D Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene
• Triphenylene
D7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
• 5+6-methylchrysene
DBeP
D7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
Dlndeno[123-cd]pyrene
DPicene
• Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene
• Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene
• Chrysene
• 3-methylchrysene
• Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
DBaP
D9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
D Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
• Benzo(ghi)perylene
D Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Figure 4-131. Abundances of particulate PAHs for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 2.
-------
Emissions of Total PAHs (mg/mile)
Total PAHs (% of Total)
160
120
C
o
'55
to
E
m
to
OJ
VO
100%
75%
(1)
0.
50%
25%
0%
D 26 other PAHs
D benzo(ghi)perylene
D 63 Volatile and SV PAHs
• 2-methylnaphthalene
D indeno[123-cd]pyrene
• coronene
• 1-methylnaphthalene
D naphthalene
S1
-1
"
S1
•2
-
-
S2
•1
-
S2|S2
-2k3
Tru
-
_
S2S
•4 pi
cks
-
-
3|S3
-2
-
-
S4
-1
-
S4
-2
-
-
S5
•1
-
-
-
S5
-2
-
S5
-3
"
-
S5
4
-
-
S5
-5
-
_
S6
-1
-
-
S6
•2
-
se
-3
Cc
-
-
—
S6
-4
srs
—
S7
-1
-
-
-
-2
-
-
-
—
S7|S7|S8|S8|S8
.3 U h -2 Ls
D26 other PAHs Dindeno[123-cd]pyrene
Dbenzo(ghi)perylene • coronene
• 63 Volatile and SV PAHs • 1 -methylnaphthalene
• 2-methylnaphthalene D naphthalene
Figure 4-132. Abundances of naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnapthalene for exhaust and dilution
blank composites during Round 1 in comparison to other volatile, semi-volatile and particulate PAHs.
-------
Emissions of Total PAHs (mg/mile)
Total PAHs (% of Total)
to
Emissions (ug/mile)
-^ NJ GO -t* Ol O)
O O O O O O O
n
|
i
•
n
n
•
.1
|
(N
i
CO
i
i
n
§
(N
S
Tru
CO
i
ck
By
s
B
CM
I
CO
i
1
i
i
CM
i
1
CO
i
B
-
-
-
CM
s
h-
co
-
—
i
-
CM
i
1
CO
Ca
n
8
•* T- CM
iii
rs
i
CO
1^.
-
•^•
>
>
1
i
1
CM
t
I
CO
26 other PAHs n indeno[1 23-cd]pyrene
benzo(ghi)perylene • coronene
63 Volatile and SV PAHs n 1-methylnaphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene n napthalene
1 UU /O
75%
•4-i
c
0)
Ji 50%
0)
0.
25%
0%
|
i
i
^
i
_
cks
-
-
CNI
CO
-
|
-
i
-
CO
i
-
i
1
^
i
ars
-
i
^
-
^
>
>
-
>
5
>
1
•Nl CO
DO OO
> >
> >
D 26 other PAHs n indeno[1 23-cd]pyrene
D benzo(ghi)perylene • coronene
n 63 Volatile and SV PAHs n 1 -methylnaphthalene
• 2-methylnaphthalene n napthalene
Figure 4-133. Abundances of naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnapthalene for exhaust and dilution
blank composites during Round 2 in comparison to other volatile, semi-volatile and particulate PAHs.
-------
to
400
300
200
100
0
5
w
Emissions (ug/mi)
CM
6
w
s
w
2
w
§
w
s
w
Tunnel
Blanks
w
1
CM
w
I
1
CNI
w
CM
CM
W
5
S
w
B
S
w
s
w
•
s
w
4
w
CM
4
w
Trucks
1
8
11
S
W
CM
uS
w
S
s
w
1
; :H_S-l—
inCDCDCDCDI^-l^-l^-l^-OOOOOO
wwwwwwwwwwww
Cars
1
Trucks
I
1
Cars
D 18a(H),21 B(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
• 17a(H), 18a(H),21 B(H)-28,30-Bisnorhopane
• 17a(H),21B(H)-Hopane
• 22R-17a(H),21 B(H)-30-Homohopane
• 22R-17a(H),21 B(H)-30,31 -Bishomohopane
• 17a(H),18a(H),21B(H)-25,28,30-Trisnorhopane
D17a(H),21 B(H)-30-Norhopane
D17B(H),21a(H)-hopane
• 17B(H),21B(H)-Hopane
D22S-17a(H),21 B(H)-30,31,32-Trisomohopane
D17a(H),21 B(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
• 18a(H),21 B(H)-30-Norneohopane
D22S-17a(H),21 B(H)-30-Homohopane
• 22S-17a(H),21B(H)-30,31-Bishomohopane
D22R-17a(H),21B(H)-30,31,32-Trishomohopane
Figure 4-134. Abundances of hopanes for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1.
-------
500 i
400 --
300 --
200 --
to
J^.
to
100 --
100% i
80% -
60% -
40% -
20% -
0%
66
Tunnel
Blanks
B
c
-------
to
70
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
10-
Emissions (ug/mi)
a
ii
Tunnel Blanks
ww
Trucks
w w w w
100%
80%
60%
40%
Cars
20%
• C27-20S-13B(H), 17a(H)-diasterane
• C27-20R-13a(H), 17B(H)-diasterane
D C27-20S5a(H), 14a(H)-cholestane
D ster45+40(cholestane)
• C28-20S5a(H), 14B(H), 17B(H)-ergostane
D C29-20R5a(H), 14B(H), 17B(H)-stigmastane
D C27-20R-13B(H), 17a(H)-diasterane
D C28-20S-13B(H), 17a(H)-diasterane
• C27-20R5a(H), 14B(H)-cholestane
D C28-20S5a(H), 14a(H), 17a(H)-ergostane
• C28-20R5a(H), 14a(H), 17a(H)-ergostane
D C29-20S5a(H), 14B(H), 17B(H)-stigmastane
D C27-20S-13a(H), 17B(H)-diasterane
• C29-20R-13a(H),17B(H)-diasterane
• C27-20S5a(H), 14B(H), 17B(H)-cholestane
• C28-20R5a(H), 14B(H), 17B(H)-ergostane
• C29-20S5a(H), 14a(H), 17a(H)-stigmastane
D C29-20R5a(H), 14a(H), 17a(H)-stigmastane
Figure 4-136. Abundances of steranes for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1.
-------
to
00 -
80 -
60 -
40 -
20 -
Emissions (ug/mi)
1
OJ
T
E
°?
ur
la
7
ne
nk
«?
1
s
9
1
\"
I
OJ
Q
CO
>
>
j
£N
>
>
1
-_^.._.iy.=
OJ
"ru
CO
ck
s
OJ
CO
i
OJ
i
5
i
OJ
-------
to
• o-toluicacid
D 4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
• 3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
D m-toluicacid
D 3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
D syringic acid
D p-toluicacid
• 3-methyladipicacid (d-c6)
D 2,3- and 3,5- dimethylbenzoic acid
• phthalic acid
Figure 4-138. Abundances of polar compounds for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1.
-------
to
1200
1000
800
o>
3
(A
(A
E
LJ
600
400
200
Tunnel Blanks
Cars
I o-toluic D m-toluic D p-toluic • 3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid • 3-methyladipic acid (d-c6) • phthalic acid • isophthalic acid D syringic acid
Figure 4-139. Abundances of polar compounds for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 2.
-------
to
2 -
E 2
O)
i/)
1
i/)
I 1
1 --
CO
CO
CO
0
CO
CO
Tunnel Blanks
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
Trucks
CO
0
CO
e
Cars
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
Dl-nitronaphthalene D2-nitronaphthalene D2-nitrobiphenyl n1-nitropyrene
Figure 4-140. Abundances of nitro-PAHs for exhaust and dilution blank composites during Round 1.
-------
to
J^.
-------
1
100% i
80% -
60% -
40% -
20% -
0%
Tunnel Blanks
ID *— CM
LO CO CO
CO CO CO
D Dodecane
• Tetradecane
• Norpristane
D Octadecane
D Eicosane
• Tridecane D Norfarnesane
• Octylcyclohexane D Pentadecane
• Heptadecane • Decylcyclohexane
D Phytane D Dodecylcyclohexane
D Tetradecylcyclohexane • Heneicosane
• Heptylcyclohexane D Farnesane
D Nonylcyclohexane • Hexadecane
D Heptadecane_Pristane D Undecylcyclohexane
D Nonadecane • Tridecylcyclohexane
D Pentadecylcyclohexane
E
LU
100% -
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
D Docosane D Hexadecylcyclohexane D Tricosane D Heptadecylcyclohexane • Octadecylcyclohexane
D Tetracosane • Pentacosane • Nonadecylcyclohexane • Hexacosane • Eicosylcyclohexane
• Heptacosane • Heneicosylcyclohexane • Octacosane • Nonacosane • Triacontane
D Hentriacontane • Dotriacontane • Tritriacontane • Tetratriacontane D Pentatriacontane
• Hexatriacontane D Heptatriacontane • Octatriacontane • Nonatriacontane
Figure 4-142. Relative abundance of alkanes in exhaust and dilution blank
composites during Round 1.
4-249
-------
D Dodecane
• Tetradecane
• Norpristane
D Octadecane
D Eicosane
• Tridecane
• Octylcyclohexane
• Heptadecane
D Phytane
• Tetradecylcyclohexane
D Norfarnesane
D Pentadecane
• Decylcyclohexane
D Dodecylcyclohexane
• Heneicosane
• Heptylcyclohexane
D Nonylcyclohexane
D Heptadecane_Pristane
D Nonadecane
D Pentadecylcyclohexane
D Farnesane
• Hexadecane
D Undecylcyclohexane
D Tridecylcyclohexane
E
LU
100% i
80% -
60% -
40%
20% -
0%
I II II II I
II II I
Tunnel Blanks
CO ly CN CO
§ § i § § §
Trucks
E
LU
100%
80%
60% -
40% -
20% -
n Docosane n Hexadecylcyclohexane n Tricosane • Heptadecylcyclohexane • Octadecylcyclohexane
D Tetracosane • Pentacosane • Nonadecylcyclohexane • Hexacosane • Eicosylcyclohexane
• Heptacosane • Heneicosylcyclohexane • Octacosane • Nonacosane • Triacontane
D Hentriacontane • Dotriacontane • Tritriacontane • Tetratriacontane • Pentatriacontane
• Hexatriacontane D Heptatriacontane • Octatriacontane • Nonatriacontane
0%
i
CM CO T IT) CO
Tunnel Blanks
Figure 4-143. Relative abundance of alkanes in exhaust and dilution blank
composites during Round 2.
4-250
-------
4.7 Speciated VOC Emissions and Gas-Phase Mobile Source Air Toxics
4.7.1 Background
Motor vehicles are a major source of volatile organic compounds. VOCs are involved in
photochemical reactions leading to the formation and accumulation of ozone in the troposphere.
VOCs also include several compounds that have been identified by EPA as hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs). Of the 33 HAPs identified by EPA as important urban air toxics, 21 are
associated with motor vehicles. The gas-phase mobile source air toxics (MSAT) of most concern
include benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylenes, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene and
acrolein. Methods for sampling and analysis of speciated VOCs are generally well developed for
both ambient and source measurements. However, certain compounds are unstable and decay
rapidly after sample collection. Methods were developed and applied to address these
measurement issues.
1,3-butadiene is known to be unstable in canister samples in the presences of NOx. Prior
work by DRI for the Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study included dynamometer studies where a
GC/MS system was installed on site to perform VOC analysis within minutes of sample
collection to prevent loss of 1,3-butadiene. However there is considerable cost associated with
installing and operating a GC/MS on site for the length of time involved in vehicle testing for
this study. As an alternative to on-site analysis, DRI examined the feasibility of stabilizing 1,3-
butadiene in canister samples by removing NO and NO2 from the exhaust samples. The
development and evaluation of a NOx denuder was funded separately by the National Renewable
Energy Laboratory (NREL) of the U.S. Department of Energy and carried out during the pilot
phase of the study. The methods and results are described in a separate report for NREL by
Fujita et al. (2004) and briefly summarized here.
Acrolein is known to rearrange on DNPH cartridges to an unknown degradation product
(acrolein-X) (Tejada, 1986). This rearrangement is sufficiently rapid that most of the acrolein
may convert to acrolein-X, unless the sample is analyzed within a few hours. The problem is
compounded by the fact that acrolein-X co-elutes in the HPLC analysis with butyraldehyde. A
procedure was developed in a separate project conducted by the DRI for the Health Effects
Institute (Fujita et al., 2006) and applied after the initial analyses to more accurately quantify
acrolein and butyraldehyde.
4.7.2 Experimental Methods
BKI conducted the vehicle emissions tests on their transportable Clayton Model CTE-50-
0 chassis dynamometer over the LA92 Unified Driving Cycle. The test site and dynamometer
setup is described in Chapter 2. The vehicle emissions tests were conducted in Kansas City
during July to September 2004 (summer/Round 1) and January to March 2005 (winter/Round 2).
The cycle consists of a cold start Phase 1 (first 310 seconds), a stabilized Phase 2 (311-1427
second), a 600-second engine off soak, and a warm start Phase 3 (repeat of Phase 1 of the LA92).
Cars and light-duty trucks were recruited for testing in four model year groups (Pre-1981, 1981-
90, 1991-95 and 1996 and newer). The vehicle groupings for trucks and cars are designated
strata 1-4 and 5-8, respectively, with the strata in each vehicle type ordered from older to newer
model years. Details of the vehicle recruitment for the study are given in Chapter 2. Samples
4-251
-------
were collected for speciation of VOC and gas-phase MSATs over the entire driving cycle. Full
sets of sampling media were also collected for daily 60-minute tunnel blanks and weekly
(approximate) field/transport blanks. Tables 4-38 and 4-39 in Section 4.6 summarize the
numbers of samples collected and subsequently selected for chemical analysis in Rounds 1 and
2, respectively.
4.7.2.1 Sampling Methods for Speciated VOC
Sampling for VOC included collection of whole air samples in canisters for analysis of
speciated hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m-& p-,o-xylene, i.e. BTEX, styrene,
n-hexane, naphthalene, 1,3-butadiene, MTBE), and DNPH-coated Sep Pak cartridges sampling
for carbonyl compounds (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein). DRI installed and operated the
samplers in accordance with the methods and procedures specified in the project QAPP.
During the planning phase of the study, we estimated the decay rate of 1,3-butadiene
according to the chemical mechanism described by Atkinson et al. (1984). They showed that a
mixture of NO and NO2 will produce a series of reactions that will result in »OH being formed in
the dark. Hydroxyl radical reacts rapidly with 1,3-butadiene resulting in its removal from a
canister sample. Theoretical calculations by our colleague at DRI, Dr. William Stockwell,
indicated that the loss of 1,3-butadiene would be rapid in a canister sample of diluted exhaust. At
NO2 mixing ratio of 1 ppm, 1,3-butadiene was projected to decay linearly at a rate of 25% over
three days. NO at 10 ppm results in a loss of 52% in the first 24 hours and about 92% loss after
three days. These simulated loss rates are also compared in Table 4-45 to loss rates of 1,3-
butadiene for ambient NOx levels typically found in high exposure microenvironments and at
central monitoring locations.
DRI fabricated a NOx denuder following the method of Braman et. al, (1986). Stainless
steel tubes (3/8" o.d.) were coated with a saturated solution of CO(NO3)2 in water and dried. The
tubes were packed inside a larger stainless steel pipe of approximately 2.5" i.d. and capped with
tapped end-caps with Vi" fittings. The entire package was heated to approximately 400°C with a
flow of approximately 300 ml/min of air through it and left for 8 to 10 hours. The oxidation of
the cobalt was confirmed by the elution of NO2 from the denuder. The denuder was tested by
challenging it with a standard of 50 ppm NO in nitrogen. The effluent was analyzed by a
chemiluminescence NOx analyzer and we found approximately 30 ppb in the effluent, which
was about the same as the zero at that time.
The newly constructed NOx denuder was tested during the pilot study phase of the
Kansas City Study with funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy through the
Natinonal Renewable Energy Laboratory. Results of these tests were reported by Fujita et al.
(2004) and are summarized in Figure 4-144. Both synthetic mixtures and vehicle exhaust
samples from Kansas City were used to evaluate the stability of 1,3-butadiene in canister
samples. Two sets of three synthetic samples were prepared - one containing 1,3-butadiene with
purified zero air and a second and third with addition of NO and NO2, respectively. NO and NO2
levels were selected to correspond to the highest LDGV NOx emitter in DOE's Gas/Diesel PM
Split Study. Aliquots were analyzed by gas chromatography within the first hour, after three
days, one week and three weeks.
4-252
-------
Table 4-45. Simulated loss rate of 1,3-butadiene with varying levels of 1,3-
butadiene, NO and NO2.
Control
Zero
High NO (Typical Dyno)
High NO2
High Exposure ME
Underground Garage
Congested Freeway
Central Monitoring
Summer
Winter
1 ,3-BD VOC
ppbv ppbC
43 0
43 0
43 0
5
2 750
1 250
1 500
Conditions
NO NO2 CO
000
0 0
0 1 ,000 0
100
300 30
75 30 1 ,000
200 40
Loss Rate of 1
6 Hrs 24 Hrs
0 0
1 1 .4% 52.4%
2.4% 9.3%
0.5% 3.9%
0.1% 0.7%
0.1% 0.3%
0.1% 0.6%
,3-BD
72 Hrs
0
92.5%
25.3%
17.0%
3.4%
1.1%
2.4%
4-253
-------
Butadiene in air & 10 ppm NO
Butadiene in air& 1 ppm NO2
o
.a
Q.
Q.
250
200
150
100
50
200 400
Hours
KC 84126 1,3-butadiene
600
50
40
30
20
10
1000
200
8°°
0
—•— N02 Sarrple 1
---D--- NO2 Sample 2
200 400
Hours
KC 84126 Propene
600
0 200 400 600 „„„ Q 20Q 40Q 60Q 80Q
Elapsed Hours from collection Elapsed Hours from collection
Figure 4-144. Stability of 1,3-butadiene in canister samples.
Upper two plots show loss rate for replicate laboratory test samples with 10 ppm NO (left) and 1
ppm NO2 (right). Lower two plots show loss rates of 1,3-butadiene (left) and propene (right)
vehicle test samples collected in Kansas City with and without a NOx denuder (Fujita et al.,
2004).
4-254
-------
The samples with NO showed exponential decay of 1,3-butadiene. By three days,
butadiene was reduced to 2.5% (first sample) and 9.8% (second sample) of the initial values. At
the one-week point, both samples had nearly undetectable levels of 1,3-butadiene. The 1,3-
butadiene with NO2 samples showed a linear decay but was not as rapid as that with NO. This
comparatively slower reaction reduced the concentration of 1,3-butadiene to 39.9% and 49.2% of
the initial concentration after three weeks. These observations are consistent with
aforementioned theoretical calculations. Exhaust from an in-use high-mileage automobile were
collected during the pilot phase of the Kansas City Study in two sets of two canisters, one with
an upstream NOx denuder and one without the denuder. After three weeks, the non-denuded
sample had .04 as much 1,3-butadiene in the denuded sample. The three-week analysis of the
denuded sample was approximately 83% of the initial analysis or a loss of 17% of the 1,3-
butadiene. This suggests it is likely the denuder was not 100% efficient and some NO and
possibly some NO2 got into the canister, but clearly much less than in the non-denuded sample.
A second sample showed greater loss of 1,3-butadiene, possibly due to reduced denuder
efficiency. In contrast, the presence of NOx in the canister sample had no effect on the stability
of propene, which served as the control.
The NOx denuder that was used during Round 1 was fitted with a heater. The denuder
was regenerated once a week during the weekend by heating for several hours at 400 °C. During
sample collection, the concentration of NOx was continuously measured downstream of the
denuder to monitor the efficiency of NOx removal (compared to NOx concentrations in the
dilution tunnel measured by BKI). Figure 4-145 shows the time-series plot of the NOx
concentrations in the dilution tunnel versus downstream of the denuder for each test during
Round 1. The denuded NOx concentrations are estimated from NO by applying a factor of 1.1
and are not valid above the maximum instrument range of 10 ppm. NOx removal efficiencies are
given for valid (i.e., under 10 ppm) denuded NOx concentrations. These results show that while
a fresh denuder was effective in removing NOx, the denuder efficiency was typically degraded
after the first day of testing. The lack of backup denuders was a limitation during Round 1,
which was not addressed until additional denuders could be built prior to start of Round 2.
Consequently, we expected substantial loss of 1,3-butadiene in most Round 1 canister samples.
Even with multiple denuders during Round 2, breakthrough of NOx was evident in many
samples due to high exhaust NOx concentrations that quickly saturated the denuder.
Alternatively, we estimated 1,3-butadiene from the data for propene and the average ratio
of propene to 1,3-butadiene measured in the Gas/Diesel PM Split Study (GDPMS). Canister
samples were collected in that study in a similar manner to the present study. But, the samples
were analyzed with an on-site GC/MS within a relatively short time after collecting the sample.
Figure 4-146 shows that ethene and propene are both strongly correlated with 1,3-butadiene.
Because of its long-term storage stability in canisters, the Kansas City propene values times the
GDPMS 1,3-butadiene/propene ratio provide reasonable estimates of the 1,3-butadiene levels in
the canister samples prior to its decay. The 1,3-butadiene/propene ratios in the Kansas City
samples generally increase with decreasing post-denuder NOx concentrations and approach the
mean GDPMS ratio at the lower end of the NOx distribution.
4-255
-------
dynoNOx_ppm
-denuded NO*1.1 (ppm)
valid den. NOx x Efficiency (NOx)
^LOCQcQaio^^LO
CslCslCslCslCs|(^(^(^
CQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQCQ
dynoNOx_ppm
-denuded NO*1.1 (ppm) A valid den. NOx x Efficiency (NOx)
Figure 4-145. Time-series plot of the dilution tunnel versus denuded NOx concentrations for each test during
Round 1.
Denuded NOx concentrations are estimated from NO by applying a factor of 1.1 and are not valid above the maximum
instrument range of 10 ppm. NOx removal efficiencies are given for valid denuded NOx concentrations. While a fresh denuder was
effective in removing NOx, it is clear that the denuder efficiency degrades rapidly.
4-256
-------
0)
c
0)
N
C
0)
o
0)
c
0)
Q.
O
10000
8000 -
6000 -
4000 -
2000 -
200
400
600
800
D propene
benzene
Linear (propene)
(benzene)
1000 1200
1,3 butadiene (ppbv)
Figure 4-146. Correlations of 1,3-butadiene with propene and benzene.
(Exhaust samples from 57 light-duty gasoline vehicles tested on the LA92 cycle (Phases 1 and 2) during the Gasoline/Diesel PM Split
Study. Canister samples were analyzed on site by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry soon after sample collection.)
4-257
-------
Results from our study for the Health Effects Institute of in-vehicle exposures to air
toxics in the South Coast Air Basin lends further support to this approach. Integrated canister
samples were collected inside a moving vehicle over a period of one hour along freeway routes
throughout the basin. The same NOx denuder that was used in the Kansas City sampling was
also used to remove ambient NOx from the in-cabin samples. Saturation of the denuder was not a
problem in this case since typical ambient NOx levels were at least 3 orders of magnitude lower
than the typical concentrations in the dynamometer dilution tunnel. Consequently, NOx
concentrations were reduced to inconsequential levels and 1,3-butadiene was stable in the HEI
canister samples. A scatter plot of the propene against 1,3-butadiene for about 50 in-cabin
samples yields a slope of 7.30 (R2 = 0.92) (Figure 4-147), which is essentially identical to the
regression results from GDPMS of 7.32 (R2 = 0.84). The correlation for the ambient
measurements is tighter than for dynamometer data because in-cabin measurements combine the
exhaust from thousands of vehicles. Figure 4-147 also shows the scatter plot of 1,3-butadiene
and propene for 24-hour samples from near-road sampling locations at Long Beach, Lynwood
and Diamond Bar with a slope similar to the correlations for on-road and dynamometer samples.
This empirical adjustment factor provides a way to assess the effectiveness of NOx removal
during the sampling in Kansas City and adjustments of the data, if necessary.
4.7.2.2 Analysis Methods
Selected canisters were combined according to the compositing decisions and analyzed
for 111 identified Ci to Cn hydrocarbons with a Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II gas
chromatograph or Varian 3400 GC both equipped with a flame ionization detector. A separate
analysis of the C^ hydrocarbons was not performed since the emphasis of this analysis was
volatile air toxics. Thus, ethane, ethylene and acetylene are reported as the sum of Cj.
hydrocarbons. Selected DNPH cartridges were analyzed for carbonyl compounds by Waters high
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with Waters 2695 Alliance separation
module, Waters 996 photodiode array detector and Empower chromatography software.
Cartridge extracts were combined according to the compositing decisions and analyzed for 14
specific Ci-C? carbonyl compounds. The analysis methods and procedures are described in the
project QAPP.
Acrolein is known to rearrange on DNPH cartridges to an unknown degradation product
(acrolein-x) (Tejada, 1986). Disappearance of the acrolein hydrazone in the analytical sample
matrix correlates quantitatively almost on a mole for mole basis with the growth of acrolein-x,
and the sum of acrolein and acrolein-x appears to be invariant with time (Tejada, 1986). The
rearrangement of acrolein occurs over time periods of days, so it was not logistically possible to
avoid the effect of this artifact in this study. The sum of acrolein and acrolein-x provides an
estimate of total acrolein that was originally present in the samples. However, the UV spectra
from the photodiode array detector show that there is substantial overlap in the chromatographic
retention time of acrolein-x with butyraldehyde. A procedure was developed in a separate project
conducted by the DRI for the Health Effects Institute (Fujita et al., 2006). This procedure was
applied after the initial analyses to more accurately quantify acrolein and butyraldehyde. The
response factor for DNPH-acrolein-X was first determined by preparing a dilution of a known
amount of acrolein in a Tedlar bag and to sample it through a DNPH cartridge. Several mixtures
of DNPH-butyraldehyde and DNPH-acrolein-X with different proportion of both compounds
were analyzed. The UV-VIS spectra of co-eluting compounds were recorded and a linear least
4-258
-------
squares method was used to relate the proportion of both compounds to the appearance of
spectrum maxima for each compound. The correction procedure was applied to the stored UV-
VIS spectra for the project samples, but for some samples the resolution of the
butyraldehyde/acrolein-X peak was not sufficient to perform the re-integration due to low sample
concentrations. For those samples the original, upper-bound estimates were retained for both
acrolein and butyraldehyde and are reported with a "<" symbol in the data set.
4-259
-------
On-Road In-Cabin Exposures
20
16 -
I 12
a.
-------
4.7.3 Results and Conclusions
VOC chemical speciation was determined for the individual/composite samples and
composite dilution tunnel blanks samples shown in Tables 4-40 and 4-41 for Rounds 1 and 2,
respectively. Table 4-42 lists the dilution tunnel blanks that were combined into composites. All
data are field-blank corrected. The chemical composition data for dilution tunnel blanks and
exhaust samples are presented in Appendix B.
The total nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) values from the DRI VOC speciation
samples were compared to corresponding data obtained by BKI. With the exception of two
obvious outliers (SI-2 and S5-4), Figure 4-148 shows good agreement for the uncomposited
samples from Round 1. However, Figure 4-149 shows that there are two distinct groups of data
in Round 2; one with better agreement between DRI and BKI and a second group with DRI
values consistently near zero compared to widely varying values for BKI. A chronological plot
of the ratios of DRI to BKI TNMHC values for Round 2 shows that DRI consistently obtained
low values during the second half of Round 2. Sampling for VOC speciation was suspended for
two weeks in mid-February during the NREL experiments on the effects of sampling
temperature on measured PM emission rates. The appearance of consistently low DRI/BKI ratios
for TNMHC coincides with the resumption of VOC sampling on February 22. The aldehyde data
also show a similar chronological pattern with consistently lower values in the second half of
Round 2, though not as sharply lower as the hydrocarbon data. As shown in Figure 4-101, the
aldehyde sampler was connected to the same branch of the sampling train as the canister
sampler. This branch of the sampling train was disconnected from the main sampling line and
capped off during the temperature experiments. A leak somewhere in this part of the sampling
train, which allowed room air to mix with vehicle exhaust, is the most probable explanation for
the near-zero ratios after the mid point in Round 2. Accordingly, the data for VOC and carbonyl
compounds for the second half of Round 2 must be considered invalid. Figure 4-150 presents a
chronological figure of the ratio of TMNHC measured by OKI and BKI. Of the 57 canisters
collected and analyzed for VOC speciation in Round 2, 32 were affected.
We examined the flow check records and discussed the details of the sampling with our
field technician to investigate the possible source of the leak. Flow audits were performed near
the end of Round 2, and the results did not indicate any serious leaks, but due to the
configuration of the interconnected samplers it would not have shown all possible leaks. Flow
checks of the can sampler were made on the line that fills the cans, so they would not indicate
leaks external to the sampler. Since the denuder and water filter (which were part of the inlet line
to the can sampler) were changed daily there seemed to be little value to periodic leak testing of
the inlet system. The NOx analyzer that was used to monitor the removal efficiency of the NOx
denuder presented another source for leaks. The analyzer was connected to the inlet system in
such a way that a leak there would have resulted in backflow into the can sampler and, to a lesser
extent, the DNPH sampler (the NOx analyzer flow is less than the can sampler, but greater than
DNPH so there is less likelihood of flow back to DNPH). Since the auto-calibrator was also
connected to the inlet of the NOx analyzer using Teflon or nylon fittings, and the connections on
the analyzers are also plastic, there was a potential for leaks to develop at that point. DRI field
personnel visually examined all lines each day to check for disconnected or broken hoses so it is
not likely that there was a major leak of that sort. One potential explanation is that a leak
occurred at the connection point to the NOx analyzer due to stress on the connectors either when
4-261
-------
the system was reconnected or while it was not in use (some of the tubing was still connected
during the February break), resulting in backflow to the VOC samplers. Another possibility is
that an internal valve in the auto-calibrator stuck open during the audits that was done by DRI in
mid-February allowing air to flow into the NOx analyzer inlet. When the NOx analyzer was
returned to DRI at the end of the study and tested, it showed very low response to a gas standard,
as it did during the latter part of round 2. After tightening the connections and repairing a
cracked internal filter holder it worked properly, so this seems a likely possibility.
The distributions in emission rates in Figures 4-151 through 4-154 for BTEX and
formaldehyde show that newer model year vehicles are generally clean and that emissions of
older vehicles are highly variable with some vehicles emitting BTEX and formaldehyde at rates
exceeding that of normal emitters by more than two orders of magnitude. The figures also
illustrate the sampling problems that occurred during the second half of Round 2. Although
unfortunate, the partial loss of VOC speciation data should be viewed in context of the two main
project objectives, which are to establish the distribution of emissions for the in-use vehicles in
Kansas City and chemical profiles for VOC and PM emissions. Even without the partial loss of
data, the speciated emissions data alone would have not been sufficient to fully characterize the
distribution of emissions of specific VOC or volatile MSAT. Rather it is the bulk hydrocarbons
and PM emissions data for the larger set of test vehicles that provide the emissions distributions
of the in-use vehicle fleet. The speciation profiles, averaged by appropriate factors such as
season, region, or high versus normal emitters, provide the means for disaggregating total
emissions to specific species.
The missing VOC speciation data were reconstructed by first calculating the ratios of
reported concentration of each hydrocarbon compound to the total HC reported for each run.
These ratios were then averaged for all valid canister samples and the resulting average and
standard deviation of the ratios were used to estimate the hydrocarbon speciation for the invalid
samples based on the total HC from BKI's bag samples. This reconstructed data are included
with the data set for completeness in a separate table. The previous plots for BTEX emissions are
shown in Figures 4-155 and 4-156 as fractions of individual species to the sum of BTEX. The
abundances of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes are similar among the samples and
between Rounds 1 and 2. Figure 4-157 shows the strong correlations among related aromatic
hydrocarbon species for all exhaust composites.
4-262
-------
800
200 400 600
DRI canister
800
Figure 4-148. Correlation plot of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRI NMHC (ppmC)
for Round 1.
400
100
200
DRI tnmhc
300
400
Figure 4-149. Correlation plots of BKI total TNMHC (ppmC) and DRI NMHC
(ppmC) for Round 2.
4-263
-------
(0
o
DRI/BKI Rat
1.75
1.50
1.25
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
L
•
*
'*//'
Ot-OOlOC\|t-OOlOC\l
Qc\ic\i^Ci!coco^Ci!
T- CM CM CO CO
sample date
Figure 4-150. Ratios of the TNMHC measured by DRI to BKI during Round 2
shown chronologically.
3000 -
2500 -
2000 -
I
"01
1500 -
1000 -
500 -
g
I
o
ro
CD
ro
~[ur
CO
CD
ro
nel
CD
ro
bla
CD
ro
nks
CD
CD
ro
3
ro
CNI
ro
H
CN
CO
"
CN
CO
n
CNI C
CO (1
Truck
T—
J CO
3 CO
S
H
CO
CO
5
CO
5
CO
I
LO
CO
1
LO
CO
u
LO
CO
s
LO
CO
--
LO
CO
B
CD
CO
B
CD
CO
H
CD
CO
CE
H
CD
CO
rs
N-
CO
1
hL
CO
hL
CO
h-
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
D o-xylene
• m/p-xylene
Q EtBenzene
D Toluene
• Benzene
Figure 4-151. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 1.
(Data for SI-2, S5-4 and S5-5 are suspect.)
4-264
-------
2000
1500 --
1000 --
500 --
Tunnel blanks
Trucks
D o-xylene
1 m/p-xylene
B EtBenzene
D Toluene
D Benzene
Cars
Figure 4-152. Emission rates (mg/mile) of BTEX for individual/composite samples
from Round 2.
(Samples collected after mid-February 2005 are invalid and are not shown in the figures.)
60
50 -
40 --
t 30 -f
20 -
10 --
n
Tunnel blanks
CO
CO
Trucks
CD
co
CD
co
Cars
Figure 4-153. Emission rates (mg/mile) of formaldehyde for individual/composite
samples from Round 1.
4-265
-------
1
^-(NCO^LOCQ^-CNCO^-
Tunnel blanks
n _
-------
1.0 ^
Figure 4-156. Fraction of BTEX for valid individual/composite samples from
Round 2.
4-267
-------
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000
BENZENE
5000 10000 15000 20000
propene
25000
5000 10000
EthylBenzene
5000 10000
15000 20000
BENZENE
25000 30000 35000
Figure 4-157. Correlation plots of related VOC species for all exhaust composites.
Concentrations shown are ppbC of diluted exhaust.
4-268
-------
The lack of correlation and the low 1,3-butadiene/propene ratios shown in Figure 4-157
indicate that a substantial fraction of the 1,3-butadiene had been lost in most of the samples due
to reaction with NOx. As previously mentioned, the true values are estimated by multiplying the
propene values by the 1,3-butadiene/propene ratio from the DOE/NREL Gasoline/Diesel PM
Split Study. Figures 4-158 through 4-161 show the measured and adjusted 1,3-butadiene
emissions rates for individual/composite samples The corrected emission rates for acrolein are
shown in Figures 4-162 through 4-163. As previously discussed, acrolein transforms into an
unknown rearrangement product which coelutes with butyraldehyde, so a re-calculation of the
sample concentrations using specially prepared standards was required to derive the total
acrolein emission rate.
In summary, the VOC profiles are very consistent across all categories for major air
toxics (BTEX). Emission rates were highly variable, but higher for strata 1, 2, 5, and 6. Tunnel
blanks showed very low concentrations relative to exhaust samples.
4-269
-------
O)
15 -
10 -
5 -
5
CO
n
(N
6
CO
Tu
CO
6
CO
inel
Tt
6
CO
blar
in
6
CO
nks
CD
6
CO
n
CO
(N
CO
1 — 1
(N
CO
(N
(N
CO
n
CO
(N
CO
Tru
n
II
•^
(N
CO
:ks
n
7>
CO
(N
CO
CO
n
4
CO
(N
4
CO
uS
CO
r~i
(N
in
CO
n
CO
in
CO
n
^
in
CO
in
in
CO
5
CO
1
II
n
(N
CD
CO
CO
CD
CO
c
•
-------
60 -
I 40-
E
20 -
D 1 ,3 butadiene (measured)
D 1 ,3 butadiene (estimated)
r\
CO
CM
rt
CO
CO
rt
CO
Tunne
^
r\
CO
IO
rt
CO
CO
6
CO
blanks
n
^
CO
CM
CO
" "
CM
CO
CM
CM
CO
P
CO
CM
CO
—
—
„.
CM
CO
1 1 1 1 1=
cA
CO
Trucks
CM
cA
CO
4
CO
CM
4
CO
1 — 1
- DP, D
•<- CM co ^- in T- CM
in in in in in CD CD
in in in in in in in
InrnD 1=1
CDCDI^I^I^I^OOOOOO
cococococococococo
Cars
Figure 4-160. Emission rates (mg/mile) of 1,3-butadiene (measured) for
individual/composite samples from Round 1 and estimated from regression with
propene.
80
60 --
40 --
20 --
D 1,3 butadiene (measured)
D 1,3 butadiene (estimated)
D
D
D
Tunnel blanks
Trucks
in
Cars
Figure 4-161. Emission rates (mg/mile) of 1,3-butadiene (measured) for
individual/composite samples from Round 2 and estimated from regression with
propene.
4-271
-------
18.0
Figure 4-162. Emission rates (mg/mile) of acrolein for individual/composite
samples from Round 1.
18.0
16.0 --
14.0 -
12.0 -
•| 10.0 --
E 8.0 --
6.0 -
4.0 -
2.0 -
0.0
Tunnel blanks
Trucks
Cars
Figure 4-163. Emission rates (mg/mile) of acrolein for individual/composite
samples from Round 2. Lighter bars are upper bound estimates.
4-272
-------
4.8 RSD Data Collection Process and Data Summary
During Rounds 1 and 2 of the project, on-road data were collected using Remote Sensing
Devices (RSD). The purpose of these deployments was to document the on-road fleet in the
Kansas City area and to measure on-road emissions. ERG subcontracted with Environmental
Systems Products (ESP) to collect RSD data for this project. ESP used RSD equipment and
personnel from the Saint Louis Clean Screen program. They also deployed a newer generation
of RSD equipment (RSD 4000, as opposed to the older generation RSD 3000) in parallel to the
equipment from their St. Louis program, so side-by-side data were collected using both
generations of equipment. Note that for Round 2, only RSD 4000 equipment was used.
4.8.1 Site Selection
During Round 1, ESP had surveyed approximately 57 potential sites in the Kansas City
area. They were evaluated for safety, physical layout, traffic volume, and geographical coverage
of the area. During Round 2, ERG asked ESP to look at another site, nearer to the area where
vehicles were being tested. The intent of using the additional site was to obtain RSD
measurements on a bigger subset of the vehicles being tested using other methods than was
obtained during Round 1. The new site chosen for use during Round 2 is labeled as "21" in
Figure 4-164. The "Top 10" best sites chosen during Round 1 are also shown in Figure 4-148
They are labeled with numbers "1" through "10." The EPA test site is labeled with the number
"0". The blue line estimates a 20-minute drive-time from the EPA test facility.
Sites 1 through 8 of the "Top-10" sites were used during Round 1 testing. The ESP team
collected data during 5-consecutive days in each of July, August, and September 2004. During
the July deployment, data were collected at five of the most promising sites to help select the
single site that would be used during the August deployment. In August, RSD data were
collected only at site 2 (Johnson Drive onto 1-35 South). This was done to replicate the
technique used in the Coordinating Research Council's Project E-23.
Sites 2, 4, 6, and 7 of the "Top-10" sites and site 21 were used during Round 2 testing.
The ESP team collected data during 5-consecutive days in each of January, February, and March
of 2005. In January, RSD data was collected only at site 2 (Johnson Drive onto 1-35 South). As
with Round 1 testing, this was done to replicate the technique used in the Coordinating Research
Council's E-23 studies. In February, data was collected only at site 21. Although the site proved
not to be a good location for obtaining RSD measurements and had very low traffic volumes, it
was the only acceptable site for obtaining RSD readings on the vehicles tested using other
methods at the EPA facility. Details for all RSD sites listed used during the study are provided
in Appendix Y.
4-273
-------
0 EPA Test Site
39.095B5,-94.7240E
County Code: WY
State: KS
'»:, /
QjoviiLih.':'JJJ:: r,'irri:i::Ti On-::, and'or ri: :u::f:.lier: ^.Ir
Figure 4-164. RSD Sites Chosen in the Kansas City Area
4.8.2 Summary of RSD Data from Rounds 1 and 2
In this section, we summarize the data collected by the most recent RSD technology
deployed, named RSD-4000.
When RSD data are collected, they are automatically screened in the field for validity,
and a digital photograph of the vehicle's license plate is linked to the results for that vehicle.
During post processing, the license plate number in each photograph is transcribed and appended
to the RSD measurement results in the database. For various reasons some license plate numbers
are not readable, so the measurement results cannot be linked to a specific vehicle. After license
plate numbers are appended to the database, it is merged with local registration records, typically
obtained from the Department of Motor Vehicles. In this project, both Kansas and Missouri
provided their registration databases for this purpose. When a license plate from the
measurement database is successfully merged with registration information, the RSD
measurements have been uniquely linked to a specific vehicle. At that point, the vehicle make,
model, model year, and other important information are linked to the measurements taken by the
RSD equipment, and the data are ready for meaningful analysis. Approximately 48,400 of the
Round 1 RSD-4000 records, and 23,300 of the Round 2 RSD 4000 records, made it to this point
in post-processing.
4-274
-------
The pie charts in Figures 4-165 and 4-166 show the number of RSD-4000 records taken
at each site during Rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Almost two-thirds of the RSD data were
collected from sites in Kansas, with almost half coming from the site used to collect data in a
manner similar to that used in CRC's Project E-23. Site 21 produced relatively few data points
because it had very low traffic volume. Site 7 produced few data points because it was only used
on one occasion (March 15). Location information for all RSD sites listed in Figures 4-165 and
4-166 is provided in Appendix Y.
The bar charts in Figures 4-167 and 4-168 show the distribution of vehicle model years in
the RSD data. This is the distribution of vehicles for which RSD data was collected (vehicles
that drove past the RSD site). According to the data, the Kansas City area fleet has an average
model year of 1998 and a median model year of 1999. The modal range of model years was
from 2000 to 2002, with 2001 having slightly fewer observations than either 2000 or 2002.
The scatter charts in Figures 4-169 and 4-170 show the average speed observed by RSD-
4000 for each model year. Site selection guidelines dictate that a moderate speed be the norm.
The average speed observed was 26.9 mi/hr for Round 1, and 25.5 mi/hour for Round 2. As
expected, the average speed increased with model year.
Figures 4-171 through 4-176 show the average emissions measurement results by vehicle
model year for CO, HC, and NO, for both Rounds of testing. The average Round 2 CO results
are nearly identical to those observed during Round 1, but the HC results are much higher during
Round 2 and NO results are slightly higher. These changes could be due to differences the
weather and in the driving patterns observed during Round 1 and during Round 2.
4-275
-------
Round 1 RSD 4000 Data
Final RSD-4000 records by site
Total count = 48,408
2373
6173
6745
3938
21573
3635
Sites 1 - 8
DKSJOH001
QKSJOH002
QKSJOH003
DMOJAC004
• MOJAC005
QMOJAC006
• MOJAC007
DMOJAC008
KS = Kansas site
MO = Missouri site
Figure 4-165. RSD-4000 Data Counts at each Round-1 Site
4852
3393
Round 2 RSD 4000 Data
Final RSD-4000 records by site
Total count = 23,290
541
14116
388
Sites 2, 21, 4, 6, & 7
KS = Kansas site
MO = Missouri site
Figure 4-166. RSD-4000 Data Counts at each Round-2 Site
4-276
-------
Round 1 RSD-4000 Data
Number of records by model year
Total Count = 48,408
4nnn
to
D)
C
^ 3000
1
p.
J
n _ n n D [I U U
pre-19751976 1978 198° 1982 1984 1986 1988 199° 1992 1994
Model Year
1996
1
1
pi
fl
1998200020022004
Figure 4-167. Round 1 RSD-4000 Vehicle Counts, by Model Year
Round 2 RSD
Number of records by model
Total Count =
2500 -
Re ^uuu
adi
ng icnn -
s
^nnnnDD
n
_ ,___1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994
Pre 1975
Model Year
1996
n
1998 2000 2002 2004
Figure 4-168. Round 2 RSD-4000 Vehicle Counts, by Model Year
4-277
-------
Average Speed (mph)
Round 1 RSD-4000 Data
Average speed by model year
9Q
9R
9fi
9Ei
94
22
91
*
V -
• ..'.* ••*•,••
pre-1 9751 976 1 978 1 98° 1 982 1 984 1 986 1 988 1 "° 1 "2 1 "4 1 "6 1 "8 200° 2002 2004
Model Year
Figure 4-169. RSD-4000 Average Vehicle Speed, by Model Year, of Round-1 Data
Q.
B
jj
Q.
Ol
O)
S
Ol
Round 2 RSD Data
Average speed by model year
°n
9Q
9R
97
9R
9R
24
9^
99
91
20
•
* * ** ** *******
- * * *
»
^
Model Year
Figure 4-170. RSD-4000 Average Vehicle Speed, by Model Year, of Round-2 Data
4-278
-------
Round 1 RSD-4000 Data
Average CO by model year
o
o
O)
E
1 1 -
n a a
D
D
°a
n n n
a a n
° a
n „
"D"Qnn
° ° n n rn
pre-19751976 1978 198° 1982 1984 198S 1988 199° 1992 1994 199S 1998 200° 2002 2004
Model Year
Figure 4-171. RSD-4000 Average CO Percentage, by Model Year, of Round-1 Data
Round 2 RSD-4000 Data
Average CO by model year
9 ^ -
S 2 -
O
O
D> 1'5
TO
1 1
n ^ -
0
Pre 1 97
n n
°
° n
D
n
n n n n
_ D
° D D
n n
° n n Q n
DQnnnDn
1 976 1 978 1 980 1 982 1 984 1 986 1 988 1 990 1 992 1 994 1 996 1 998 2000 2002 2004
Model Year
Figure 4-172. RSD-4000 Average CO Percentage, by Model Year, of Round-2 Data
4-279
-------
Preliminary RSD-4000 Data
Average HC by model year
600
500
£ 400
I 300
1
^ 200
5
100
Q
A
A
A A
A * * * * A * A
A A A
AAAAAAAA&A
Model Year
Figure 4-173. RSD-4000 Average HC Concentration, by Model Year, of Round-1
Data
Round 2 RSD Data
Average HC by model year
§.
•— 1 500
o
I
HI
01 1 000
§
<
500
A
A
A
A
A A A
A A ° ^^ *A*AAAAA
Model Year
Figure 4-174. RSD-4000 Average HC Concentration, by Model Year, of Round-2
Data
4-280
-------
Preliminary RSD -4000 Data
Average NO by model year
1000 -
Q.
o
Z 600 -
0)
dPd>o^dPd?>c£c9'c$t
^ ^ ^ $> $> $> $> $> $> $> ^ $> $> ^ ^ $r
^
Model Year
Figure 4-176. RSD-4000 Average NO Concentration, by Model Year, of Round-2
Data
4-281
-------
4.8.3 Comparison of RSD Observations with PEMS Data
ERG performed a comparison of RSD data collected in the Kansas City area with second-
by-second (SBS) observations from the PEMS unit connected to the dynamometer.
Thousands of RSD observations yielded VINs, speed, acceleration, and concentrations of
HC, CO, and NOx for a wide variety of vehicles in the Kansas City fleet. This data, along with
measured RSD site grades and vehicle weights from the ERG VIN Decoder, were used to
calculate vehicle specific power (VSP) for each instantaneous observation. The calculation was
based on equations used by EPA in MOVES2004, using SAS code provided by Jim Warila.
The same calculations were performed on second-by-second observations obtained from
a PEMS unit on the dynamometer. Having determined VSP for each instantaneous observation,
the data were segregated into by model year VSP bins for further analysis. Since the valid VSP
range for RSD is 5 to 20 kW/tonne, only those measurements were retained. The VSP bins were
created using ranges of 6 - 9, 9 - 12, and 12-18 kW/tonne. All observations gathered during
Phase 1 of the LA92 test were dropped, since these would represent cold-start emissions, a
scenario unlikely at the RSD sites selected for this study.
For each model year -VSP bin combination, the mean and variance of HC, CO, and NOx
were calculated for both RSD and SBS data sets. For the SBS data, for a given bin, a test
vehicle's measurements were averaged first, then the average of the averages were calculated to
produce the cell average.
Summary tables of the data, for both Rounds 1 and 2, is provided in Appendices W and
X. Graphs of pollutant concentrations of RSD versus Dyno SBS for CO, CO2 and NOxfor
Rounds 1 and 2 are provided in Figures 4-177 through 4-182.
4-282
-------
Round 1 — CO Comparison between RSD and DYN
(Tar up bins B-B, 9-13, 12-lfl)
J.O
8
5?
a,o-l
i j
Mean DYN »arc£0
Figure 4-177. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison
Round 1 — CD2 Comparison between RSD and DYN
(far tap bins H—9, 9-13, 12-lflJ
18-
1.5 •
o
£
m
K
c
o
Mean D™ parc«S2
Figure 4-178. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison
4-283
-------
Round 1 — NOx Comparison between RSD and DYN
(Far vap bins H-9, 9-12, !2-1fl>
|l
IK] 3CD 43D SOD TEH DLC
lam 12DQ
Mean DYN ppmNOx
Figure 4-179. Round 1 RSD vs. Dynamometer NOX Comparison
Round Z - CO Comparison between RSD and DYN
(Tnr uip bins B-3,.9—12, !2-1fl>
J.O-
i.5-
8
Ef
1 J
Moan DYN
Figure 4-180. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO Comparison
4-284
-------
Round 2 - CD2 Comparison between RSD and
fnr*np bins H-9, 9-12, 12-1H}
18-
15-
B.
Mean DYN parcCO2
Figure 4-181. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer CO2 Comparison
Round 2 - NOx Comparison between R5D and DYN
tFnr «P bins H-9, 9-13, 12- 1 H>
1AOO-
1500:
0-1
49D eao TBQ
Mean DYN ppmNQjc
Figure 4-182. Round 2 RSD vs. Dynamometer NOX Comparison
4-285
-------
Comparisons of emissions measured by the PEMS unit as a vehicle passed RSD Site 21
with that measured by the RSD system was also performed. In order to perform this comparison,
PEMS files were reviewed to identify second-by-second observations when vehicles were within
the GPS coordinate range of the RSD unit, with similar speed readings for PEMS vs. RSD and
with similar time stamps (time stamps alone were insufficient for identifying matches because
the RSD timestamps were inconsistent with the PEMS timestamps). In order to confirm good
readings were obtained, occasionally the test vehicle was driven through the RSD site two or
more times (prior to beginning the vehicle conditioning run). In this situation, multiple RSD
readings were available for a single vehicle.
In order to perform a PEMS to RSD comparison using this data, the RSD reading (or
average of multiple readings) for each vehicle was compared with an average of PEMS readings
(generally 4 readings) as the vehicle passed through the RSD site. Because of the GPS and
exhaust transport delays, and because of the consistency of the PEMS readings as the vehicle
passed through the RSD site, taking an average of PEMS readings was felt to be more
representative of its emissions at the RSD site rather trying to identify the specific second the
vehicle received the RSD reading. Second-by-second PEMS results and RSD readings are
provided at the end of Appendix X, and a summary of comparison of average readings for PEMS
vs. RSD is provided in Table 4-46, and also is shown graphically in Figures 4-183 through 4-186
(along with a 1:1 reference line).
4-286
-------
Table 4-46. Summary of RSD vs. PEMS results at RSD Site 21
%
P
-^-1
5«
£
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/23/2005
2/24/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
%
0
HH
3
729
728
731
737
747
744
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
S
>§
•a
%
a.
in
P
£
25.2
25.2
N/A
1.0
27.4
27.4
3.1
2.0
29.4
29.2
0.3
3.0
31.1
31.1
N/A
1.0
28.3
30.0
5.7
4.0
34.6
35.1
2.5
4.0
"8
1>
a.
in
vi
&
1*
It
24.55
24.50
1.43
4.00
27.03
28.55
3.12
8.00
28.03
27.90
1.40
4.00
30.08
30.10
0.15
4.00
31.90
31.65
1.35
4.00
30.05
30.10
1.22
4.00
|
&
U
M
0
£
14.94
14.94
N/A
1.00
-67.35
-67.35
49.55
2.00
-34.70
-25.32
22.21
3.00
123.10
123.10
N/A
1.00
-29.42
-31.10
29.81
4.00
-30.57
-38.29
33.78
4.00
£
a.
fe
U
M
x
%
W
a.
279.83
280.46
14.29
4.00
106.03
104.23
38.70
8.00
105.92
105.45
5.21
4.00
1268.51
1274.04
349.27
4.00
176.20
175.95
9.91
4.00
32.62
32.75
2.02
4.00
g
O
u
0
£
0.26
0.26
N/A
1.00
0.06
0.06
0.01
2.00
0.27
0.16
0.19
3.00
1.02
1.02
N/A
1.00
0.17
0.13
0.09
4.00
0.61
0.19
0.90
4.00
g
O
u
X
%
w
a.
0.03
0.04
0.00
4.00
0.05
0.03
0.04
8.00
0.21
0.21
0.02
4.00
4.52
4.71
2.77
4.00
0.13
0.12
0.03
4.00
0.10
0.11
0.02
4.00
g
fS
O
u
0
£
14.85
14.85
N/A
1.00
14.99
14.99
0.04
2.00
14.83
14.90
0.13
3.00
14.29
14.29
N/A
1.00
14.91
14.93
0.07
4.00
14.61
14.91
0.65
4.00
g
fS
O
u
X
%
w
a.
13.05
13.06
0.03
4.00
12.96
12.94
0.18
8.00
13.01
13.02
0.02
4.00
10.30
10.31
1.70
4.00
13.09
13.08
0.02
4.00
9.37
9.37
0.01
4.00
t
8.
&
H
O
z
0
£
230.16
230.16
N/A
1.00
580.28
580.28
686.11
2.00
695.36
685.49
194.21
3.00
496.48
496.48
N/A
1.00
610.92
612.23
560.86
4.00
93.67
52.34
121.23
4.00
|
&
H
O
z
X
%
u
a.
1073.30
983.40
362.34
4.00
508.83
432.09
228.43
8.00
819.61
831.36
45.57
4.00
195.46
191.26
73.31
4.00
967.78
1036.04
264.72
4.00
77.50
77.68
22.36
4.00
4-287
-------
F
Q.
o
I
W
RSDvs. PEMSHC
(vehicle ID 737 excluded)
200
150 -
100
50 -
o
-50
-100
^^^
^^fff****~'^
^
^^^^
^^*^^
* * *
*
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
PEMS HC (ppm)
Figure 4-183. RSD vs. PEMS HC readings at RSD Site 21
5 -,
O
Q
W
o:
RSDvs. PEMS CO
234
PEMS CO (%)
Figure 4-184. RSD vs. PEMS CO readings RSD Site 21
4-288
-------
RSDvs. PEMSCO2
15
14
3 13
212
V)
* 11
10
10
11
12 13
PEMS CO2 (%)
14
15
Figure 4-185. RSD vs. PEMS CO2 readings RSD Site 21
1
x
o
2
Q
W
o:
RSDvs. PEMS NOx
1000 -
800 -
600 -
400 -
900
o
^ —
^^
^^^^
^^fH^"1^ £
^ ^^^*
^^****1'^
^Ill0lll*ff'^
^iillllr*lfl*1'^
^i_-x-^"*'*^ ^
^-""^
0 200 400 600 800 1000
PEMS NOx (ppm)
Figure 4-186. RSD vs. PEMS NOX readings RSD Site 21
4-289
-------
4.9 PAMS testing
PAMS testing was commenced near the end of Round 2. Six PAMS units, Ease OBDII
dataloggers, were provided to ERG by the USEPA. New software and batteries were purchased
for these units, and all units were configured for auto activation for driveaway testing. One unit
was found to be malfunctioning, and was returned to Ease for warranty repair. This unit was
repaired and returned, but not until after the end of Round 2 field activities.
Since PAMS testing didn't begin until the end of Round 2, only eight vehicles received
PAMS tests, as listed in Table 4-47.
Table 4-47. PAMS Vehicle Summary
VehID
694
696
755
740
724
909
905
906
Mfr
Oldsmobile
Dodge
Toyota
Ford
Chevrolet
Honda
Toyota
Ford
Model
Silhouette
Durango
Avalon
Escape
Blazer
Civic
Camry
Escape
MY
2002
2002
1998
2002
1996
2002
2001
2002
Odo
61190
28730
29610
44901
94372
30600
46891
36230
Install
Date
2/16/05
2/16/05
3/2/05
3/22/05
3/25/05
3/29/05
3/29/05
3/29/05
PAMS
ID
PI
P4
P5
P3
PI
P2
P5
P4
Notes
No data were available on datalogger when it was
removed. Acquired software and configured unit.
unit sparked and participant pulled it out along with
DLC, paid $1800 in repairs. No data were recorded,
datalogger required configuration. Acquired software
and configured unit.
No data werte recorded on datalogger when it was
removed. Acquired software and configured unit for
future testing.
Data available and downloaded.
No data on this datalogger for some reason (unit had
been configured but still didn't acquire data).
Data available and downloaded. However, data appears
to have been configured as "Visible Grid Parameters"
(rather than "Sensors"), so data has no VSS field
(vehicle speed). Also, data exported as one large
datafile (rather than small datasets).
Data available and downloaded.
Data available and downloaded.
As can be seen in the table, three PAMS units were installed prior to the purchase of
software and operating batteries, and no data were available on these units. Once the software
and batteries were received, the PAMS units were configured to acquired the following data:
elapsed time, engine RPM, calculated load, air flow rate, vehicle speed, absolute throttle
position, engine coolant temp, and emission related DTC count. One unit was apparently
configured to acquire different parameters, and therefore didn't obtain vehicle speed, a necessary
parameter in activity data logging. The data that were gathered with the other units will be
included in the MSOD data tables provided for this study.
4-290
-------
5.0 MSOD
In accordance with the requirements set forth in the original Scope of Work, data
procured over the course of the project was processed and delivered in the EPA's MSOD format.
Field data collection procedures were designed with MSOD data collection requirements in
mind.
After collecting and compiling data from the vehicle test program, datasets were prepared
for import into the EPA MSOD. Data integrity and accuracy are of the utmost importance, and in
order to ensure that the data prepared for the MSOD accurately represents the data that was
originally received, the following four step approach for electronic data handling and
manipulation was developed.
• Import raw data into SAS dataset(s);
• Review and convert data to match MSOD format and export to text files;
• Import text files into the final MSOD .DBF format using Foxpro; and
• Verify the validity of the output database and files.
This approach separates raw import and data cleanup issues from project-specific issues
of data format conversion and validation. In the first three stages, emphasis was placed on
automation. Scripts and programs were used as much as possible, to provide repeatable steps for
the verification stage and documentation. Appendix Z presents a detailed data map of raw input
files imported, SAS programs used for aggregation and analysis, intermediate SAS datasets used
in data cleanup and conversion, and final output text files imported into .DBF format for Rounds
1 and 2 of the study.
In the first import stage, the raw input data, which was generally in comma-separated
variable (CSV) format, was loaded into SAS datasets. The data was imported into datasets that
mimicked, to the extent possible, the design of the original files. In this way, each raw input file
mapped to one or more specific SAS datasets, with close agreement in table content and layout.
While some data cleanup was needed for a successful data import, no data manipulation (such as
unit conversions or factor manipulation) was performed at this stage. Minor data cleanup was
required in some cases because of conflicts between file types, such as end-of-record or end-of-
data discrepancies, differences in character sets, conflicting numeric formats, or data types that
did not convert directly. After the data was loaded into SAS datasets, it was reviewed for data
integrity and completeness. SAS programs used during this stage included the following:
• rdBKI_Aligned.sas. This program reads in both second-by second dynamometer
observations for each vehicle, as well as a summary of total bag readings for each
phase of the dynamometer testing. Both datasets were provided by BKI. Although
the bag data presented in this dataset is suspect for reasons discussed in Section
4.2, it was important to record and preserve the bag data in MSOD, which may be
used to provide a rough comparison with modal data. Cumulative by-phase modal
5-1
-------
observations can be derived from the second-by-second data if required. The
program returns two output SAS datasets:
4> bki_bag_aligned, containing by-phase dynamometer bag observations, and
•v- bki_sbs_aligned, containing second-by-second dynamometer modal
readings.
rdSEMTECH.sas. This program reads in raw files from the PEMS units,
encompassing all dyne PEMS, conditioning, and driveaway files. It also
incorporates the bki_sbs_aligned SAS dataset described above to provide second-
by-second speed readings where those observations were missing in the PEMS
data. This program returns several SAS datasets:
•v- semtech sbsdyno, containing second-by-second data for the dyne PEMS,
•v- semtech bag dyno, containing PEMS data at the phase level for
comparison with observations taken on dynamometer itself, for QC
purposes,
•v- semtech vehshort, containing summary data from the headers of all dyne
PEMS records,
•v- semtech_precond sbs, containing second-by-second data for the PEMS
conditioning runs,
•v- semtech_precond'veh, containing summary data from the headers of all
PEMS conditioning run records,
•v- semtech driveaway sbs, containing second-by-second data for the PEMS
driveaway runs, and
•v- semtech driveaway veh, containing summary data from the headers of all
PEMS driveaway records.
rdDRI.sas. This program reads in by-phase particulate measurements from all PM
instruments, obtained from a QC'ed dataset provided by EPA. It also reads in
mass, EC, OC, and elements data, as well as speciated VOC observations from
vehicle composites, both provided by DRI. The program returns a single SAS
dataset:
•v- dri all baglevel, containing all of the by-phase information detailed
above.
Rdveh.sas. This program reads in vehicle information gathered from onsite logs,
along with several of the datasets described above. The program assigns flags to
vehicle records that describe what tests were performed on each vehicle, and
whether those tests were sufficiently valid for later inclusion in MSOD. The
program returns 2 datasets:
•v- vehID dyn_pre drw, containing basic vehicle information and flags
identifying valid tests, and
•v- vehroundl 2, containing more detailed information on each vehicle that is
specifically required for MSOD.
rdDRI SbS.sas. This program reads in second-by-second PM observations for
each vehicle tested, as provided by DRI. It returns two datasets:
•v- topjile, containing summary information on the data file read in for each
vehicle, later used for QC purposes, and
5-2
-------
^ sbsjile., containing the actual second-by-second observations for each PM
instrument used.
• Rdfuel.sas. This file reads in data from laboratory fuel analysis, as provided by
EPA. It returns a single dataset:
Fuelt containing all available fuel parameters required for the MSOD.
Figure 5-1 depicts data flow during the first import stage of the process during Round 1.
Round 2 followed a very similar process, with slight differences in filenames.
Once the data were imported into SAS datasets and reviewed , the datasets were
remapped from a format similar to the original raw data files, to a scheme more closely
resembling that needed for import to MSOD. All required conversions and data manipulation
were performed in SAS at this point, and the datasets were converted from an intermediate form
into final output text files. SAS programs used during this stage generally took datasets prepared
as described above as inputs, and returned text files ready for import into Foxpro as output.
These output files were named according to standard MSOD nomenclature, and each output file
generally corresponds to an individual MSOD table. Figure 5-2 depicts data flow during the
review and conversion stages of the process.
5-3
-------
By -vehicle SBS dyne
observations from BKI
|
Summary of bag and modal
dyne measurements from
3JCI
1
+
rdBKI Aligned, sas
bki_sbs_aligned
SAS dataset
bki_bag_aligned
SAS dataset
bki_sbs_aligned
SAS dataset
SEMTECH data files from
dyne, conditioning, and
driveawavs
semtech_sbs_dyno
SAS dataset
semtech_veh_short
SAS dataset
semtech_bag_dyno
SAS dataset
rdSEMTECH.sas
semtech_precond_veh
SAS dataset
semtech_driveaway_veh
SAS dataset
semtech_driveaway_sbs
SAS dataset
semtech_precond_sbs
SAS dataset
PM measurements by
phase
Mass, EC, OC, and
Elements measurements
by phase
i
Speciated VOC
measurements of
vehicle composites
r
rdDRI.sas
1
r
dri_all_baglevel
SAS dataset
Figure 5-1. Data Flow During First (Raw Data) Import Phase
5-4
-------
Vehicle information
from on-site logs
bki_bag_aligned
SAS dataset
dri_all_bagl
SAS dataset
v
rdveh.sas
veMD_dyn_pre_drw
SAS dataset
semtech_veh_short
SAS dataset
;vel
£t
1
r
1
semtec
'
semtech_precond_veh
SAS dataset
SAS dataset
vehroundl_2 SAS
dataset
Second-by-second PM
observations
i
r
rdDRI Sbs.sas
top_file
SAS dataset
sbs_fil
SAS dataset
Lab-analyzed fuel
parameters
rdfuel.sas
fuel
SAS dataset
Figure 5-1. Data Flow During First (Raw Data) Import Phase (continued)
5-5
-------
5-6
-------
vehroundl_2
SAS dataset
ksequip.sas
I
fuel
SAS dataset
ksfuel.sas
cuuii)
in.txt
J
r
fbat in.txt
sbs_fil
SAS dataset
ks rmeas.sas
I
rmeas
in.txt
veMD_dyn_pre_drw
SAS dataset 1
bki_sbs_aligned
SAS dataset
i
bki_bag_aligned
SAS dataset
dri_all_baglevel
SAS dataset
r
ksdyno.sas
veMD_dyn_pre_drw
SAS dataset
bki_bag_aligned
SAS dataset
bki_sbs_aligned
SAS dataset
actty_in_dynob
.txt
ksactty_dyno.
*" ""
"\
sas
/
trip_in_dynob
.txt
ttime_in_dynob
txt
dri_all_baglevel
SAS dataset
semtech_sbs_dyno
SAS dataset
semtech_veh_short
SAS dataset
omeas_in_dynob
.txt
Figure 5-2. Data Flow During Review and Conversion Phase
5-7
-------
vehID_dyn_pre_drw
SAS dataset 1
semtech_precond_veh
SAS dataset
i
semtech_precond_sbs
SAS dataset
r
ksactty_predcond
.sas
i
actty_in_predcond
.txt
1
trip_in_predcond
.txt
1
ttime_in_predcond
.txt
omeas_in_predcond
.txt
^
vehID_dyn_pre_drw
SAS dataset I
semtech_driveaway_veh
SAS dataset
i
semtech_driveaway_sbs
SAS dataset
r
ksactty_driveaway
.sas
actty_in_driveaway
.txt
trip_in_driveaway
.txt
ttime
_in_driveaway
.txt
omeas_in_driveaway
.txt
Figure 5-2. Data Flow During Review and Conversion Phase (continued)
5-8
-------
These text files were then loaded into DBF format with scripts developed using Foxpro
version 8.0. The scripts incorporated some basic validity and range checks for the data, and
converted the final text files into individual database tables required for MSOD and checkable by
EPA's validation software. Note that during this stage, the actty_in, trip_in, and ttime_in files
generated for each of the dyne PEMS, conditioning run, and driveaway datasets (and PAMS data
during Round 2) were merged into one Foxpro database file for import into MSOD. Also, in lieu
of generating a database table for pmeas_in, EPA approved the creation of compact omeas_in
text files containing a wide array of non-emission related second-by-second measurements from
the PEMS units. These omeas_in tables will be converted to MSOD format by EPA staff at a
later date.
It is important to mention a problem that arose during processing of second-by-second
observations in the rmeas_in table. Specifically, the dynosecs field in the MSOD rmeas_in table
is defined as an integer. Many of the observations recorded in rmeas_in have a time resolution of
tenths of hundredths of a second, and Foxpro was rounding these seconds to the nearest whole
integer. Apart from the obvious problem of the unacceptable loss of time resolution in the data,
this also caused some otherwise separate measurements to be recorded in the database as having
duplicate dynosecs values. Because the dynosecs field is defined as a primary key in the
database, these duplicate observations were not passing validation tests. In order to preserve the
original time resolution in the data, a separate table, rmeas_in_adjusted, was created. This table
was identical to rmeas_in, except that it contained an additional field, secs_adj, in which a non-
rounded time measurement was recorded.
The final step in the data management process involved running EPA's EPAVALDATA
program against each of the DBF import tables. This program quality assures each of the tables
and log all errors encountered. Each of the errors were reviewed and addressed accordingly.
Once the automated review of the tables for each dataset were complete they were delivered to
EPA for further verification and loading into the MSOD.
5-9
-------
6.0 References
Anderson, T. L. and J. A. Ogren (1998). "Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the
TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer." Aerosol Science and Technology 29(1): 57-69.
Arnott, W. P., H. Moosmiiller and J. W. Walker (2003). Photoacoustic instrument for measuring
particles in a gas. USA Patent 6,662,627, Desert Research Institute, Reno NV.
Arnott, W. P., H. Moosmuller, C. F. Rogers, T. Jin and R. Bruch (1999). "Photoacoustic
spectrometer for measuring light absorption by aerosols: Instrument description." Atmospheric
Environment 33: 2845-2852.
Arnott, W. P., H. Moosmuller and J. W. Walker (2000). "Nitrogen dioxide and kerosene-flame
soot calibration of photoacoustic instruments for measurement of light absorption by aerosols."
Review of Scientific Instruments 71(7): 4545-4552.
Arnott, W. P., B. Zielinska, C. F. Rogers, J. Sagebiel, K. E. Kelly, D. A. Wagner, A. F. Sarofim
and J. S. Lighty (2004). "Evaluation of 1047 nm photoacoustic instruments and photoelectric
aerosol sensors in source-sampling of BC aerosol and particle bound PAH's from gasoline and
diesel powered vehicles." Environmental Science and Technology submitted 15 March.
Atkinson, R. S.S. Aschmann, A.M. Winer and J.N. Pitts, Jr. "Gas Phase Reactions of NO2 with
Alkene and Dialkenes." 1984. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. Vol. 16, No. 6 pp.
697-706.
Booker, D., 2001. Development of a Real-time Transient Cycle Mass Monitor. Proc. ETH
Conference on Nano-particle Measurement, Aug. 2000, Paper 20, ed. A. Mayer.
Braman, R. S., de la Cantera, M. A., Han, Q. X. "Sequential, selective hollow tube
preconcentration and chemiluminescence analysis system for nitrogen oxide compounds in air".
Anal. Chem. 58, 1537(1986).
Brockmann, J.E., Liu, B.Y.H and McMurry, P.H., "A Sample Extraction Diluter for Ultrafme
Aerosol Sampling", Aerosol Science & Technology, 441-451 (1984).
Burnette, A.D.; Kishan, S., (July 2000), "PART5-TX1: Update of the PARTS Model For Use In
Texas." (Report by ERG for the Texas Commisssion on Environmental Quality. Austin, Texas).
Cadle, S. H.; Mulawa, P. H.; Ball, J.; Donase, C.; Weibel, A.; Sagebiel, J. C.; Knapp, K. T.;
Snow, R. (1997) Particulate emission rates from in-use high-emitting vehicles recruited in
Orange County, California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31: 3405-3412.
Cadle, S. H.; Mulawa, P.; Hunsanger, E. C.; Nelson, K.; Ragazzi, R. A.; Barrett, R.; Gallagher, G.
L.; Lawson, D. R.; Knapp, K. T.; Snow, R. (1999) Light-duty motor vehicle exhaust particulate
matter measurement in the Denver, Colorado, area. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 49: PM-164-
174.
6-1
-------
Chow, I, J. Watson, D. Crow, D. Lowenthal and T. Merrifield (2001). "Comparison of
IMPROVE andNIOSH Carbon Measurements." Aerosol Science and Technology 34(1): 23-34.
Chow, J. C., J. G. Watson, L. C. Pritchett, W. R. Pierson, C. A. Frazier, and R. G. Purcell, 1993:
The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance carbon analysis system: Description, evaluation and
applications in U.S. air quality studies. Atmos.Environ., 27A, 1185-1201.
Daley, P.S., Lundgren, D.A., (1975). "The performance of piezoelectric crystal sensors used to
determine aerosol mass concentrations", American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, July
1975, p518-532"
Dalzell, W. H. and A. F. Sarofim (1969). "Optical constants of soot and their application to heat
flux calculations." Journal of Heat Transfer: 100-104.
Dickens, C. and D. Booker, 1998. Characterization of Vehicle Emissions. Journal of Aerosol
Science, Volume 29, Supplement 1, September 1998, Page 351
Durbin, T. D.; Smith, M. R.; Norbeck, J. M.; Truex, T. J. (1999) Population density, particulate
emission characterization, and impact on the particulate inventory of smoking vehicles in the
South Coast Air Quality Management District. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 49: 28-38.
Dzubay, T. G.; Stevens, R. K.; Gordon, G. E.; Olmez, L; Sheffield, A. E.; Courtney, W. J. (1988)
A composite receptor method applied to Philadelphia aerosol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 22: 46-52.
Fujita, E., J.G. Watson, J.C. Chow, N. Robinson, L. Richards, and N. Kumar (1998). Northern
Front Range Air Quality Study. Volume C: Source Apportionment and Simulation Methods and
Evaluation. Final report prepared for Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, June 30, 1998.
Fujita, E., B. Zielinska, J. Sagebiel and D. Campbell (2004). Kansas City PM Characterization
Study Pilot Study Testing Report - Addendum: Effect of Sampling Temperature on Chemical
Speciation 1,3-Butadiene Stability Experiments. Report prepared for U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
October 27, 2004.
Fujita et al, (2005) Data gathered in the Los Angeles Basin for the Health Effect Institute Study
of the exposures to air toxics in mobile source dominated microenvironments.
Fujita, E., D.E. Campbell, B. Zielinska, W.P. Arnott and J.C. Chow (2006). Exposure to Air
Toxics in Mobile Source Dominated Microenvironments. Draft final report prepared for the
Health Effects Institute under HEI contract 4704-RFA03-1/03-16, Boston, MA, July 27, 2006.
Fuller, K. A., W. C. Malm and S. M. Kreidenweis (1999). "Effects of mixing on extinction by
carbonaceous particles." Journal of geophysical research 104(D13): 15941-15954.
Harmon, Wayne (2004). Email correspondence.
6-2
-------
Henry, R.C., Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 1997, 37(1), 37-42.
Hildemann, L. M.; Markowski, G. R.; Jones, M. C.; Cass, G. R. (1991) Sub micrometer aerosol
mass distributions of emissions from boilers, fireplaces, automobiles, diesel trucks, and meat-
cooking operations. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 14: 138-152.
Hopke, P.K., Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 95-117.
Japar, S. M. and D. K. Killinger (1979). "Photoacoustic and absorption spectrum of airborne
carbon particulate using a tunable dye laser." Chemical Physics Letters 66: 207-209.
Japar, S. M. and A. C. Szkarlat (1981a). "Measurement of Diesel Vehicle Exhaust Particulate
Using Photoacoustic Spectroscopy." Combustion Science and Technology 24: 215-219.
Japar, S. M. and A. C. Szkarlat (1981b). Real-time measurements of diesel vehicle exhaust
particulate using photoacoustic spectroscopy and total light extinction. Fuels and Lubricants
Meeting, Tulsa OK, SAE.
Japar, S. M., A. C. Szkarlat and W. R. Pierson (1984). "The determination of the optical
properties of airborne particle emissions from diesel vehicles." The Science of the Total
Environment 36: 121-130.
Kleeman, M. J.; Schauer, J. J.; Cass, G. R. (2000) Size and composition distribution of fine
particulate matter emitted from motor vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34: 1132-1142.
Lawson, D. R.; Smith, R. E. (1998) The northern front range air quality study: a report to the
Governor and General Assembly. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University; December.
Lawson, D., E. Fujita, B. Zielinska., D. E. Campbell, W. P ARnott, J.C. Sagebiel, L. Rinehart, J.
Chow, P. Gabele, W. Crews, R. Snow, N. N. Clark, and W. S. Wayne, " Variations in Speciated
Emissions from Spark-Ignition and Compression-Ignition Motor Vehicles in California's South
Coast Air Basin," AW-05-00197, (Submitted to J. Air Waste Assoc. Oct 12, 2006).
Magliano, K. L. (1998) Chemical mass balance modeling of data from the 1995 integrated
monitoring study. Sacramento, CA: California Air Resources Board.
Maricq, M. M.; Podsiadlik, D. H.; Chase, R. E. (1999) Gasoline vehicle particle size
distributions: comparison of steady state, FTP, andUS06 measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol.
33:2007-2015.
Mid_America Regional Counci (MARC)l, Final Repert (2004), "Kansas Cirty Regional
Household Travel Survey", Submitted by NuStats, Stacey Bricka, Research Director, July 27,
2004.
6-3
-------
Moosmuller, H., W. P. Arnott, C. F. Rogers, J. L. Bowen, J. A. Gilles, W. R. Pierson, J. F.
Collins, T. D. Durbin and J. M. Norbeck (2001). "Time resolved characterization of diesel
particulate emissions. 1. Instruments for particle mass measurements." Environmental science
& technology 35(4): 781-787.
Moosmuller, H., W. P. Arnott, C. F. Rogers, J. L. Bowen, J. A. Gillies, W. R. Pierson, J. F.
Collins, T. D. Durbin and J. M. Norbeck (200 Ib). "Time resolved characterization of particulate
emission: 2. Instruments for elemental and organic carbon measurements." Environmental
Science & technology 35: 1935-1942.
Motallebi, N. (1999) Wintertime PM2.5 and PMio source apportionment at Sacramento,
California. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 49: PM-25-34.
Norbeck, J. M.; Durbin, T. D.; Truex, T. J. (1998) Measurement of primary particulate matter
emissions from light-duty motor vehicles. Riverside, CA: University of California, College of
Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology; prepared for Coordinating
Research Council, Inc. and South Coast Air Quality Management District, CRC Project No. E-
24-2.
Petzold, A. and R. Niessner (1994). The Photoacoustic Soot Sensor for BC Monitoring. Fifth
International Conference on Carbonaceous Particles in the Atmosphere, Berkeley, CA.
Petzold, A. and R. Niessner (1995). "Novel Design of a Resonant Photoacoustic Spectrophone
for Elemental Carbon Mass Monitoring." Applied Physics Letters 66(10): 1285-1287.
Ramadan, Z.; Song, X.-H.; Hopke, P. K. (2000) Identification of sources of Phoenix aerosol by
positive matrix factorization. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50: 1308-1320.
Roessler, D. M. (1984). "Photoacoustic Insights on Diesel Exhaust Particles." Applied Optics
23(8): 1148-1155.
Sagebiel, J. C.; Zielinska, B.; Walsh, P. A.; Chow, J. C.; Cadle, S. H.; Mulawa, P. A.; Knapp, K.
T.; Zweidinger, R. B.; Snow, R. (1997) PM-10 exhaust samples collected during EVI-240
dynamometer tests of in-service vehicles in Nevada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31: 75-83.
Schauer, J.J., Rogge W.F., Hildemann, L.M., Mazurek, M.A., Cass G.R.. Atmos. Environ. 1996,
30,3837-3855.
Sioutas, C., S. Kim, M. Chang, L. L. Terrell and H. Gong (2000). "Fied evaluation of a modified
DataRAM4 MIE scattering monitor for real-time PM2.5 mass concentration measurements."
Atmospheric Environment 34: 4829-4838.
Schauer, J.J., MJ. Kleeman, G.R. Cass and B.R.T. Simoneit, Environ. Sci. Technol, 2002,
36(17), 3806-3814.
6-4
-------
Schauer, J. 1; Rogge, W. F.; Hildemann, L. M.; Mazurik, M. A.; Cass, G. R. (1996) Source
apportionment of airborne participate matter using organic compounds as tracers. Atmos.
Environ. 30: 3837-3855.
Schauer, J.J., and G.R. Cass, 2000, "Source apportionment of wintertime gas-phase and particle-
phase air pollutants using organic compounds as tracers," Environmental Science and
Technology, 34, 1821-1832.
Tejada S.B. (1986). Evaluation of Silica Gel Cartidges Coated In Situ with Acidified 1,4-
dinitrophenylhydrazine for Sampling Aldehydes and Ketones in Air. Intern. J. Environ. Anal.
Chem. 26: 167-185.
Terhune, R. W. and J. E. Anderson (1977). " Spectrophone Measurements of the Absorption of
Visible Light by Aerosols in the Atmosphere." Optics Letters 1(2): 70-72.
Watson, J. G., J. C. Chow, D. H. Lowenthal and L. C. Pritchett (1994). "Differences in the
carbon composition of source profiles for diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles." Atmospheric
environment 28(15): 2493-2505.
Watson, J., E. Fujita, J.C. Chow, B. Zielinska, L. Richards, W. Neff, and D. Dietrich (1998).
Northern Front Range Air Quality Study. Final report prepared for Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO, June 30, 1998.
Watson, J. G., J. C. Chow, and C. A. Frazier, 1999: X-ray fluorescence analysis of ambient air
samples. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles, Vol. 1, Landsberger, S. and M. Creatchman,
Eds., Gordon and Breach Science, 67-96
Watson, J.G., T. Zhu, J.C. Chow, J. Engelbrecht, E.M. Fujita, and W.W. Wilson. Atmos. Environ.
2001,35, 1567-1584.
Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Chen, L.-W.A. Summary of organic and elemental carbon/BC
analysis methods and intercomparisons; Aerosol and Air Quality Research 2005, 5(1), 69-102.
http://caart.org.tw.
Yanowitz, J., McCormick, R.L and Graboski, M.S., In-use emissions from heavy-duty diesel
vehicles, Environmental Science & Technology, 34 (2000), pp. 729-740.
Zielinska, B. and J.C. Sagebiel (2001) Collection of In-Use Mobile Source Emissions Samples
for Toxicity Testing, Project No. RCI-8-18148-01, Final Report prepared forDoD/NREL,
February 2001
6-5
-------
Index of Appendices
Appendices will be provided electronically. The following is a list of the appendices,
their filename, and their contents.
A-l
-------
Appendix A&B_DRI_Data.pdf
Appendix A. Concentration of Species Normalized to Larger of Mean Field Blank Value
or MDL - Analytical sensitivity Relative to Emission Levels Based Upon Round 1 Data.
Appendix Bl. Chemical Composition of Dilution Tunnel Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust
Samples for Roundl.
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Tunnel Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust
Samples for Round2.
AppendixC_Round_l_Recruitment.doc
AppendixD_Round_2_Recruitment.doc
AppendixE_Dyne_QA_Checks.doc
Monthly CVS Propane Injection Tables
Periodic Multipoint Calibration for Dyne Instruments Tables
Daily PDF and Dyne QA Checks
AppendixF_Dyne_Calculations.doc
Calculations for the Dynamometer Determined Regulated Emissions
Table of Data Fields for the Regulated Emission Calculation Spreadsheet
AppendixG_Other_Round_l_Data.doc
Round 1 (All Vehicles) - Weighted Emissions and Fuel Economy
Round 1 SEMTECH vs. Dyno Comparison Table
Round 1 By Bag Plots of SEMTECH vs. Dyne
Round 1 By Bag, By Bin Plots of HC/CO/NOx/Grav PM emissions
Round 1 Scatter Plots of Dyne HC/CO/NOx vs. Grav PM
Round 1 Plots of HC/CO/NOx/Grav PM as a function of model year
AppendixH_Other_Round_2_Data.doc
Round 2 (All Vehicles) - Weighted Emissions and Fuel Economy
Round 2 SEMTECH vs. Dyno Comparison Table
Round 2 By Bag Plots of SEMTECH vs. Dyne
Round 2 By Bag, By Bin Plots of HC/CO/NOx/Grav PM emissions
Round 2 Scatter Plots of Dyne HC/CO/NOx vs. Grav PM
Round 2 Plots of HC/CO/NOx/Grav PM as a function of model year
Appendix_I_Install_Guidelines.doc
Appendix_J_Round 2 SEMTECH Checklist.doc
Appendix_K_Revised conditioning routes for final Rnd 2 report.doc
Appendix_L_PEMS fuel economy calculations_eqns only.doc
Appendix_M_Offsite QC and analysis.doc
Appendix_N_Onsite QC and analysis.doc
Appendix_O_Rl dyne perns qc summary.xls
Appendix_P_R2 dyne perns qc summary.xls
A-2
-------
Appendix_Q_Rnd 1 cond run QC.xls
Appendix_R_Rnd 1 driveaway QC.xls
Appendix_S_Rnd 1 dyne test issues.xls
Appendix_T_Rnd 2 cond run QC.xls
Appendix_U_Rnd 2 driveaway QC.xls
Appendix_V_Rnd 2 dyne test issues.xls
Appendix_W_rsd_sb s_rnd 1 _my vsp. csv
Appendix_X_rsd_sb s_rnd2_my vsp. csv
Appendix_Y_KC RSD Sites.xls
Appendix_Z_Data Map.xls
Appendix AA - QAPP (including revised Appendix A)
Appendix BB - Pilot Report
Appendix CC - Scope of Work
Appendix DD - Work Plan
Appendix_EE_retest_vehicle_info.xls
Appendix_FF - KC_fuels_analysis_complete.pdf
Appendix_GG_Rnd 1 Grav vs QCM.xls
Appendix_HH_Rnd 2 Grav vs QCM.xls
Appendix_II_QMP.pdf
Appendix_JJ_ KC Rnds 1 and 2 Vehicle Info.xls
Appendix_KK_NuStats_Demographics.mdb
Appendix_LLNustats_Demographics_Data_Dictionary.doc
Appendix_MM_Gas_Diesel_Split_Study.doc
Appendix_NN_Round_ 1 _2_Average_Emi s si on_Data
A-3
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix A & B
DRI Data
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix A. Concentration of Species Normalized to Larger of Mean Field Blank Value or
MDL - Analytical sensitivity Relative to Emission Levels Based Upon
Round 1 Data.
Appendix Bl. Chemical Composition of Dilution Tunnel Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust
Samples for Round 1.
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Tunnel Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust
Samples for Round 2.
-------
Appendix A1. Concentrations of Organic Species Normalized to Larger of Mean Field Blank Value or MDL -
Parameter
Gravimetric mass
Carbon fractions by TOR (IMPROVE)
Organic Carbon Fraction 1
Organic Carbon Fraction 2
Organic Carbon Fraction 3
Organic Carbon Fraction 4
Pyrolyzed Organic Carbon
Organic Carbon
Elemental Carbon Fraction 1
Elemental Carbon Fraction 2
Elemental Carbon Fraction 3
Elemental Carbon
Total Carbon
Elements by XRF
Sodium (qualitative only)
Magnesium (qualitative only)
Aluminum
Silicon
Phosphorous
Sulfur
Chlorine
Potassium
Calcium
Titanium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Iron
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Arsenic
Selenium
Bromine
Rubidium
Strontium
Yttrium
Zirconium
Molybdenum
Palladium
Silver
Cadmium
Indium
Tin
Antimony
Barium
Lanthanum
Gold
Mercury
Thallium
Lead
Uranium
PAH by GC/MS
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1 -methylnaphthalene
Biphenyl
1 +2ethylnaphthalene
2,6+2, 7-dimethylnaphthalene
1 ,3+1 ,6+1 Jdimethylnaphth
1 ,4+1 ,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
1 ,2-dimethylnaphthalene
2-Methylbiphenyl
3-Methylbiphenyl
4-Methylbiphenyl
Dibenzofuran
Bibenzyl
A-trimethylnaphthalene
1 -ethyl-2-methylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphthalene
Field Blanks
Min Avg Max
0.4 1.5 3.6
0.7 1.5 3.1
0.8 1.5 3.7
0.5 1.5 4.2
0.5 1.5 4.5
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.7 1.5 4.0
0.0 0.4 2.2
0.0 0.1 0.3
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.3 1.6
0.7 1.5 4.0
0.0 0.6 1.0
0.5 1.5 2.8
0.0 1.4 3.5
0.0 1.5 3.4
0.2 1.5 2.1
0.0 0.9 2.4
0.0 0.6 2.3
0.0 0.5 2.4
0.3 1.5 4.3
0.0 0.0 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.1
0.0 0.2 0.5
0.0 0.1 0.2
0.0 0.5 1.9
0.0 0.4 1.0
0.0 0.5 2.5
0.0 1.2 3.3
0.0 1.1 2.4
0.0 0.4 2.1
0.0 0.1 0.3
0.1 0.4 1.1
0.0 0.0 0.1
0.0 0.1 0.3
0.0 0.3 0.6
0.0 0.4 0.9
0.0 0.2 0.8
0.0 0.3 0.5
0.2 0.6 0.9
0.0 0.2 0.8
0.0 0.2 0.9
0.0 0.3 1.5
0.0 0.3 1.4
0.0 0.3 0.6
0.0 0.6 1.1
0.0 0.1 0.4
0.0 0.3 0.8
0.0 0.5 1.2
0.0 0.1 0.3
0.0 0.3 0.8
0.0 0.3 0.7
0.3 1.0 2.0
0.4 1.0 1.9
0.4 1.0 1.7
0.1 1.0 1.9
0.1 1.0 2.3
0.2 1.0 1.6
0.4 1.0 1.4
0.4 1.0 1.5
0.5 1.0 1.6
0.0 1.0 2.9
0.1 1.0 2.9
0.1 1.0 2.7
0.3 1.0 1.6
0.0 1.0 2.3
0.3 1.0 1.7
0.1 1.0 1.8
0.3 1.0 1.8
Dilution Blanks
Min Avg Max
14.3 26.7 46.7
1.1 9.7 13.9
3.0 11.1 20.3
2.8 7.3 11.9
3.0 20.2 59.6
0.0 1.0 5.6
2.6 9.5 14.7
0.3 18.1 56.7
3.9 27.7 73.8
0.0 6.5 29.0
3.3 34.4 72.7
2.8 10.9 17.0
0.0 3.3 6.6
1.6 5.0 7.3
1.2 5.1 11.4
9.8 24.7 55.6
0.6 2.8 5.1
43.9 76.9 128.9
0.2 2.2 7.8
5.3 12.3 24.5
28.0 63.0 125.4
0.2 0.5 1.2
0.1 0.4 0.9
0.4 1.4 3.2
1.2 6.4 20.7
13.2 65.2 143.0
0.0 1.3 2.9
1.2 2.2 3.0
3.6 12.5 24.4
1.8 7.5 17.3
0.2 1.4 3.4
0.0 0.4 0.9
0.2 1.3 2.7
0.0 1.0 1.7
0.0 0.2 0.5
0.2 1.6 3.1
0.0 1.2 2.1
0.6 1.6 2.6
0.4 1.4 2.4
0.0 0.8 1.3
0.1 1.2 2.4
0.2 1.3 2.8
0.0 1.1 2.1
0.0 1.1 4.0
0.1 0.7 2.0
0.2 0.5 0.8
0.0 0.1 0.6
0.2 1.4 3.1
0.7 1.1 1.4
0.0 0.3 0.6
0.9 2.1 4.5
0.2 0.7 1.4
1.4 2.9 4.3
4.8 12.2 19.1
4.6 11.2 17.3
1.9 2.9 3.8
2.0 3.3 4.3
5.3 13.8 23.1
4.9 11.0 16.6
0.4 1.2 3.7
3.4 9.0 14.0
1.1 2.4 4.8
1.0 2.6 5.1
1.0 2.3 4.0
4.2 14.6 27.6
1.0 4.4 7.4
3.7 8.2 12.6
2.3 3.9 6.0
3.8 4.9 6.3
All Vehicle Composites
Min 10th% 50th% 90th% Max
39.5 87.4 178.1 672.4 1009.2
3.2 13.8 51.4 441.5 712.4
6.4 10.7 40.5 174.6 537.7
5.0 5.8 18.9 32.9 45.4
10.9 22.3 43.5 134.0 202.4
0.1 0.2 0.4 34.1 901.5
5.8 10.3 34.3 108.0 245.9
23.4 42.4 148.3 586.1 847.1
21.5 68.6 234.7 1790.3 4902.8
0.0 0.0 9.5 68.4 296.7
36.4 87.4 263.9 1741.7 4205.4
9.5 17.9 50.6 151.2 427.7
0.3 2.0 4.6 11.0 16.9
1.1 2.0 5.7 16.6 24.2
1.1 1.8 5.8 19.8 35.1
11.6 16.7 56.4 746.8 1605.1
1.0 3.9 15.2 47.3 76.7
35.6 69.3 193.4 591.4 2836.0
0.9 1.3 4.7 10.5 24.4
1.8 4.3 8.7 32.2 50.4
16.8 26.6 106.7 195.7 425.7
0.0 0.0 0.4 0.6 1.9
0.0 0.0 0.3 1.1 5.6
0.2 1.0 4.1 20.5 41.1
0.0 0.6 3.8 15.7 33.0
22.0 25.5 107.6 381.0 1367.7
0.0 0.6 1.9 9.7 25.4
1.2 1.8 6.0 27.9 74.0
5.8 9.1 40.9 97.9 209.5
7.4 11.3 34.7 89.7 168.9
0.0 0.0 1.0 3.8 4.4
0.0 0.0 0.7 1.8 3.3
0.0 0.0 1.1 3.4 11.3
0.2 0.3 4.7 29.8 47.7
0.0 0.0 0.6 2.1 5.9
0.0 0.2 0.9 4.4 13.5
0.0 0.0 0.5 2.9 13.2
0.0 0.5 2.3 7.6 39.4
0.0 0.2 1.9 7.9 10.6
0.0 0.1 1.0 2.9 4.0
0.1 0.4 1.0 2.9 3.9
0.0 0.0 0.6 2.0 3.5
0.0 0.0 0.8 2.9 4.4
0.0 0.1 1.4 4.3 6.0
0.0 0.1 1.3 3.0 6.6
0.0 0.1 1.2 3.6 5.2
0.0 0.0 0.6 1.8 2.2
0.0 0.0 0.5 3.4 5.6
0.0 0.0 0.6 3.5 10.4
0.0 0.0 0.2 2.3 5.8
0.0 1.3 5.4 27.2 63.4
0.0 0.0 0.5 3.0 9.1
2.8 8.7 21.8 48.1 59.8
52.5 170.7 593.8 1925.4 2499.9
44.4 150.3 513.0 2089.9 2517.8
4.2 11.0 34.5 186.2 280.9
2.1 6.4 21.5 72.5 92.0
31.1 88.4 315.5 1603.0 2633.1
24.8 73.5 279.5 1389.2 2205.4
4.0 11.3 121.3 1294.8 2716.6
25.5 64.7 415.8 5264.7 15666.2
0.2 0.3 0.7 2.0 2.4
0.5 0.8 3.1 6.7 11.0
0.6 0.9 2.7 8.1 13.9
14.7 24.2 67.5 288.0 523.5
0.0 0.5 1.5 5.2 6.2
11.9 25.4 78.3 587.1 2005.2
4.1 9.8 39.1 224.0 796.1
5.9 17.6 52.6 401.4 1327.1
A1-1
-------
Appendix A1. Concentrations of Organic Species Normalized to Larger of Mean Field Blank Value or MDL -
Parameter
C-trimethylnaphthalene
2-ethyl-1 -methylnaphthalene
E-trimethylnaphthalene
F-tri methylnaphthalene
2,3,5+l-trimethylnaphthalene
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
J-tri methylnaphthalene
1 ,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Dibenzothiophene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
A-methylfluorene
1-methylfluorene
B-methylfluorene
9-fluorenone
Xanthone
Acenaphthenequinone
Perinaphthenone
2-methylanthracene
3-methylphenanthrene
2-methylphenanthrene
9-methylphenanthrene
4,5-methylenephenanthrene
1 -methylphenanthrene
Anthrone
Anthraquinone
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene
A-dimethylphenanthrene
B-dimethylphenanthrene
C-dimethylphenanthrene
D-dimethylphenanthrene
1 ,7-dimethylphenanthrene
E-dimethylphenanthrene
9-methylanthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
9-Anthraaldehyde
Retene
Benzonaphthothiophene
1 +3-methylfluoranthene
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py
B-MePy/MeFI
C-MePy/MeFI
D-MePy/MeFI
4-methylpyrene
1-methylpyrene
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene
Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Triphenylene
Chrysene
Benzanthrone
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
3-methylchrysene
Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione
5+6-methylchrysene
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)fluoranthene
BeP
BaP
Perylene
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
Dibenzo(a,j)anthracene
lndeno[123-cd]pyrene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Benzo(b)chrysene
Picene
Field Blanks
Min Avg Max
0.2 1.0 2.0
0.1 1.0 1.6
0.2 1.0 2.2
0.3 1.0 1.7
0.2 1.0 2.0
0.3 1.0 2.1
0.1 1.0 2.2
0.0 1.0 2.6
0.4 1.0 1.7
0.3 1.0 1.6
0.0 1.0 4.3
0.3 1.0 1.9
0.3 1.0 1.3
0.2 1.0 2.1
0.1 1.0 1.9
0.2 1.0 1.6
0.1 1.0 1.9
0.3 1.0 1.7
0.1 1.0 2.0
0.1 1.0 1.9
0.1 1.0 2.6
0.3 1.0 1.3
0.4 1.0 1.4
0.4 1.0 1.3
0.2 1.0 1.5
0.1 1.0 1.5
0.3 1.0 1.6
0.0 0.7 2.2
0.0 1.0 2.3
0.0 1.0 2.6
0.6 1.0 1.7
0.2 0.7 1.1
0.4 1.0 1.5
0.2 0.4 0.5
0.3 0.8 1.2
0.2 0.5 1.0
0.0 1.0 4.9
0.2 1.0 2.4
0.3 1.0 2.6
0.0 0.3 1.1
0.0 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.3 0.6
0.2 0.6 1.2
0.2 0.6 0.8
0.0 1.0 3.5
0.3 0.8 1.8
0.2 0.7 2.1
0.0 0.8 2.1
0.1 1.0 3.1
0.0 0.1 0.5
0.0 1.0 4.7
0.0 0.8 3.2
0.2 1.0 2.7
0.5 0.9 1.7
0.5 1.0 2.0
0.0 0.2 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.6
0.1 0.2 0.4
0.0 0.3 0.9
0.0 0.4 1.1
0.0 1.0 2.7
0.2 0.4 0.6
0.0 0.4 2.5
0.0 1.0 2.5
0.1 0.5 0.8
0.2 1.0 3.6
0.0 0.2 0.7
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.9
0.0 0.0 0.2
0.1 0.4 1.2
Dilution Blanks
Min Avg Max
3.8 7.7 12.2
0.7 3.8 17.3
3.1 6.9 12.0
3.9 6.6 10.7
3.0 6.9 14.5
2.2 3.7 5.9
1.0 2.0 3.1
1.2 11.6 30.5
3.8 9.6 18.6
1.0 3.1 11.2
1.5 6.8 16.2
2.3 4.7 7.4
3.9 6.7 9.4
0.2 2.6 7.0
3.0 5.5 7.8
3.1 6.4 9.9
1.9 3.7 5.0
1.7 3.6 8.6
0.6 1.6 2.9
0.9 4.1 8.1
0.1 2.3 3.3
6.6 15.8 34.8
4.8 8.2 11.2
4.1 6.9 9.5
4.6 7.1 9.9
8.8 26.1 44.4
3.4 5.9 8.8
0.8 4.4 8.8
0.6 3.8 8.3
1.0 1.9 2.4
6.4 8.5 10.8
4.3 5.4 6.3
6.8 10.0 12.8
3.7 5.4 7.5
6.6 9.3 12.0
4.6 6.3 8.4
0.5 10.0 27.5
4.9 8.7 11.7
4.3 9.1 16.5
0.2 1.6 5.7
0.1 0.1 0.2
1.1 1.8 2.5
2.8 4.8 10.8
7.2 10.6 12.7
2.9 10.7 15.0
1.6 9.3 13.9
4.4 9.8 13.2
5.4 9.5 11.9
0.0 7.9 11.6
0.9 7.0 10.2
2.9 13.9 22.0
0.0 7.4 10.9
3.4 12.1 18.5
5.3 16.8 33.6
3.2 12.8 23.6
4.5 18.1 31.5
0.1 0.4 1.0
0.6 2.8 4.7
0.3 5.5 10.1
0.1 0.9 2.2
1.6 3.3 4.9
0.1 0.4 1.0
0.1 7.0 13.1
0.0 2.6 7.5
0.3 1.5 2.9
0.3 1.2 2.8
0.0 0.8 1.6
0.0 0.2 0.4
0.0 0.7 1.8
0.0 1.5 3.4
0.0 0.4 1.2
0.1 0.3 0.6
All Vehicle Composites
Min 10th% 50th% 90th% Max
6.7 15.6 48.3 388.3 1408.8
0.8 1.5 5.1 36.9 119.1
4.0 9.2 30.9 242.7 847.8
5.6 11.9 36.7 299.4 1403.4
4.3 7.5 27.9 188.9 838.3
0.3 3.5 13.7 143.0 651.8
2.2 3.2 11.4 104.8 399.4
2.8 8.9 36.9 311.1 969.3
50.8 69.0 218.6 1291.4 8409.5
2.3 6.0 15.4 89.5 297.5
5.1 19.8 70.9 562.3 2402.6
2.7 3.5 15.8 41.5 117.8
11.4 16.5 50.9 217.3 707.9
4.2 13.3 67.8 803.2 2535.0
5.9 10.4 31.3 284.5 460.3
7.7 11.7 33.4 207.2 277.2
5.0 9.0 29.5 181.9 334.0
0.8 2.7 22.0 83.4 166.1
0.0 0.1 1.6 5.3 19.5
1.5 2.1 7.0 36.5 64.5
0.4 1.2 3.1 10.6 18.1
10.3 12.6 57.5 404.8 864.9
8.6 15.2 44.5 243.1 380.7
7.6 11.7 33.8 171.0 249.8
6.0 11.4 41.4 274.1 681.3
7.4 12.0 41.2 290.3 688.2
5.3 9.7 27.1 124.6 210.8
0.0 0.9 4.2 25.8 61.3
0.0 0.0 0.6 7.4 21.2
0.6 1.3 3.0 11.4 20.7
2.0 8.0 34.5 190.0 287.7
4.2 6.5 17.8 94.1 146.5
5.6 10.9 36.9 208.1 361.3
2.9 5.3 15.4 69.8 122.2
6.1 10.4 36.4 230.7 412.8
3.5 6.7 20.0 117.1 191.7
0.1 1.2 11.9 70.3 133.4
6.7 9.3 29.1 165.7 500.1
4.9 7.6 22.1 191.5 588.6
0.0 0.0 5.7 33.9 76.1
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7
0.0 0.5 2.0 4.4 16.4
1.9 2.5 18.9 102.9 283.4
1.2 4.0 19.3 72.2 125.1
4.0 5.8 21.2 101.4 281.0
3.1 4.3 18.2 82.3 254.6
1.7 4.6 14.4 61.0 147.0
2.7 3.7 10.2 56.6 216.4
0.1 1.0 9.2 37.6 124.1
0.7 1.9 7.1 36.8 196.1
1.5 2.8 12.5 68.0 248.3
0.0 0.8 20.2 603.9 3149.3
2.7 3.5 15.0 82.9 238.0
2.3 3.3 17.1 65.1 191.1
1.9 2.6 11.2 38.6 128.8
0.0 0.0 0.0 34.9 82.4
0.0 0.0 0.3 3.1 8.8
0.7 1.0 5.4 22.8 64.2
0.0 0.1 4.5 20.2 52.4
0.0 0.0 1.0 5.4 21.9
0.5 1.2 5.4 28.5 65.9
0.6 0.9 3.9 14.4 72.6
2.4 4.1 30.1 233.3 576.5
1.2 2.5 17.3 177.5 768.7
0.0 0.6 6.2 58.4 160.5
0.5 0.8 3.1 11.9 32.4
0.0 0.0 0.3 1.0 4.2
0.0 0.0 1.3 9.8 21.9
0.0 0.0 13.4 205.3 726.9
0.0 0.0 2.2 14.6 21.9
0.0 0.0 1.7 6.1 10.3
0.0 0.0 1.7 11.3 17.3
A1-2
-------
Appendix A1. Concentrations of Organic Species Normalized to Larger of Mean Field Blank Value or MDL -
Parameter
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Anthanthrene
Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Coronene
Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene
HOPANES by GC/MS
C27-tetracyclic terpane
C28-tetracyclic terpane
C28-tetracyclic terpane
1 8a(H) ,2 1 B(H)-22 ,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),18a(H),21U(H)-25,28,30-Trisnorhopane
1 7a(H) ,2 1 B(H)-22 ,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),18a(H),21B(H)-28,30-Bisnorhopane
1 7a(H) ,2 1 B(H)-30-Norhopane
1 8a(H) ,2 1 B(H)-30-Norneohopane
17a(H),21B(H)-Hopane
17B(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-1 7a(H),21 B(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-1 7a(H),21 B(H)-30-Homohopane
17B(H),21B(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21B(H)-30,31-Bishomohopane
22R-17a(H),21B(H)-30,31-Bishomohopane
22S-1 7a(H),21 B(H)-30,31 ,32-Trisomohopane
22R-1 7a(H),21 B(H)-30,31 ,32-Trishomohopane
C27-tetracyclic terpane
STERANES by GC/MS
C27-20S-13B(H),17a(H)-diasterane
C27-20R-13B(H),17a(H)-diasterane
C27-20S-13a(H),17B(H)-diasterane
C27-20R-13a(H),17B(H)-diasterane
C28-20S-13B(H),17a(H)-diasterane
C29-20R-13a(H),17B(H)-diasterane
C27-20S5a(H) , 1 4a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H) , 1 4G(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H) , 1 4B(H) ,1 7B(H)-cholestane
ster45+40(cholestane)
C28-20S5a(H) , 1 4a(H) , 1 7a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H) , 1 4B(H), 1 7B(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H) , 1 4B(H) ,1 7B(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H) , 1 4a(H) ,1 7a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H) , 1 4a(H) , 1 7a(H)-stigmastane
C29-20R5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-stigmastane
C29-20S5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-stigmastane
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastane
ALKANES by GC/MS
Undecane
Dodecane
Tridecane
Norfarnesane
Heptylcyclohexane
Farnesane
Tetradecane
Octylcyclohexane
Pentadecane
Nonylcyclohexane
Hexadecane
Norpristane
Heptadecane
Decylcyclohexane
Heptadecane_Pristane
Undecylcyclohexane
Octadecane
Phytane
Dodecylcyclohexane
Nonadecane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Eicosane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Heneicosane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Docosane
Field Blanks
Min Avg Max
0.0 1.0 5.8
0.0 0.2 0.7
0.6 1.0 1.2
0.0 0.1 0.3
0.0 0.5 2.2
0.0 0.1 0.2
0.00 0.19 0.65
0.00 0.66 1.50
0.00 0.13 0.40
0.00 1.00 2.24
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.03 0.15
0.00 0.03 0.15
0.58 1.00 1.91
0.00 0.01 0.05
0.36 1.00 2.72
0.00 0.13 0.40
0.00 1.00 1.70
0.00 0.97 1.70
0.00 0.17 0.40
0.00 0.15 0.90
0.00 0.28 1.10
0.00 0.24 1.45
0.00 0.05 0.15
0.00 0.19 0.50
0.00 0.32 0.50
0.00 0.25 0.85
0.00 0.07 0.25
0.00 0.22 0.75
0.00 0.15 0.50
0.00 0.07 0.25
0.00 0.23 0.90
0.05 0.38 0.75
0.00 0.26 0.80
0.33 1.00 2.65
0.00 0.04 0.25
0.00 0.61 1.15
0.00 0.23 0.90
0.00 0.19 0.75
0.00 0.12 0.50
0.00 0.15 0.45
0.00 0.10 0.25
0.00 0.13 0.45
0.1 1.0 2.0
0.4 1.0 2.1
0.3 1.0 2.7
0.4 1.0 1.7
0.3 1.0 2.5
0.1 1.0 3.0
0.2 1.0 2.8
0.2 1.0 2.3
0.1 1.0 2.3
0.0 1.0 3.5
0.3 1.0 1.9
0.4 1.0 1.7
0.7 1.0 1.7
0.1 1.0 3.5
0.1 1.0 2.1
0.6 1.0 1.4
0.5 1.0 1.7
0.4 1.0 1.6
0.1 1.0 1.9
0.5 1.0 1.5
0.3 1.0 2.6
0.3 1.0 1.6
0.7 0.9 1.3
0.2 1.0 1.5
0.1 1.0 3.6
0.1 1.0 2.6
Dilution Blanks
Min Avg Max
0.0 1.0 3.0
0.0 0.2 0.7
0.5 2.0 5.2
0.0 0.2 0.8
0.2 0.7 1.4
0.0 0.1 0.3
0.25 1.40 4.20
0.60 1.76 3.55
0.05 0.48 1.35
1.73 4.59 8.07
1.75 3.34 4.95
0.25 0.44 0.85
0.00 0.14 0.65
2.75 6.54 12.50
0.00 0.16 0.35
2.17 5.44 12.08
0.00 0.33 1.25
2.07 3.42 5.59
0.00 2.51 4.85
0.00 0.75 2.15
0.00 1.48 3.55
0.00 1.48 2.75
0.00 1.08 2.35
0.00 0.67 1.80
0.00 0.68 2.30
1.85 2.64 4.25
0.95 2.08 4.45
0.35 0.81 2.35
0.50 1.73 4.85
0.00 0.87 3.25
0.15 0.69 1.90
0.25 1.12 3.60
1.70 3.17 6.15
0.85 1.77 4.25
1.56 4.01 10.58
0.00 0.22 0.95
0.15 0.93 2.85
0.10 0.93 2.95
0.30 0.92 3.10
0.25 1.10 2.65
0.15 1.38 3.15
0.15 0.99 2.45
0.15 1.28 3.40
0.2 1.3 2.6
0.1 0.6 1.3
0.3 1.4 2.3
1.0 3.7 10.2
0.3 2.3 6.0
0.1 2.1 7.1
0.2 1.0 3.8
0.2 1.1 3.1
0.5 6.4 19.7
0.2 0.7 1.4
0.5 1.9 4.2
0.8 2.8 4.8
0.6 3.3 6.0
0.4 2.5 7.0
0.7 5.0 8.6
0.6 1.8 5.4
0.5 4.7 16.8
1.5 7.3 17.1
2.8 5.9 12.2
2.5 6.2 14.7
0.5 1.9 7.7
0.7 4.7 10.4
3.9 11.2 24.0
2.0 4.5 10.4
0.2 0.7 1.6
1.1 2.3 4.9
All Vehicle Composites
Min 10th% 50th% 90th% Max
2.0 8.4 31.3 518.6 1507.1
0.0 0.0 4.0 99.4 594.1
0.2 0.3 1.2 3.6 7.4
0.0 0.0 1.2 30.4 68.7
1.8 4.8 19.1 446.9 1021.0
0.0 0.0 0.2 5.1 12.2
0.00 0.00 1.92 16.30 24.85
0.00 0.00 1.98 10.45 13.30
0.00 0.17 1.23 5.90 11.10
0.00 2.18 7.88 44.51 79.27
0.00 0.00 7.55 44.23 82.45
0.00 0.00 0.65 6.93 9.50
0.00 0.00 0.10 4.77 10.60
2.41 4.01 18.24 125.48 233.56
0.00 0.00 0.72 3.85 6.95
0.63 2.68 18.35 120.33 267.78
0.00 0.00 1.43 16.00 59.60
0.74 1.66 9.17 75.89 165.76
0.00 1.23 9.00 64.70 173.55
0.00 0.00 2.35 23.17 57.00
0.00 0.13 6.35 65.75 133.25
0.00 0.45 3.67 36.53 91.20
0.00 1.03 3.25 37.28 80.00
0.00 0.00 2.53 24.60 50.70
0.00 0.00 1.28 10.20 16.85
0.00 0.65 2.83 17.05 29.75
0.00 0.20 2.35 11.23 22.60
0.00 0.20 0.93 5.03 7.55
0.00 0.17 1.65 10.52 14.20
0.00 0.00 0.52 6.82 10.25
0.00 0.00 1.33 11.52 17.30
0.00 0.00 0.98 9.33 13.90
0.00 0.72 4.55 27.87 33.65
0.00 0.32 2.45 14.00 17.30
0.00 0.97 5.57 28.30 34.68
0.00 0.00 0.50 3.53 5.05
0.00 0.00 0.58 5.95 8.40
0.00 0.00 1.05 8.73 13.95
0.00 0.00 1.23 8.15 11.45
0.00 0.25 2.18 11.40 21.85
0.00 0.33 3.15 18.38 33.70
0.00 0.30 2.05 11.80 22.80
0.00 0.17 2.37 12.05 25.50
0.1 0.2 0.8 3.8 11.4
0.0 0.1 0.5 1.6 12.2
0.0 0.0 0.9 4.4 24.7
0.2 0.9 2.8 10.0 28.7
0.2 0.6 1.9 6.7 22.4
0.1 0.5 2.3 11.1 23.0
0.0 0.1 0.9 2.7 4.1
0.0 0.3 0.8 3.3 10.4
0.0 0.4 2.6 14.6 70.2
0.0 0.2 1.1 2.2 4.4
0.2 0.5 1.3 3.4 4.4
0.4 1.1 2.1 6.2 9.4
0.1 0.8 2.0 7.1 18.1
0.0 0.2 1.0 5.4 8.7
0.1 0.9 4.9 15.7 25.9
0.0 0.1 0.9 2.3 8.7
0.0 0.9 4.1 14.0 47.7
0.8 2.1 6.6 34.3 84.3
0.4 1.3 3.0 14.3 52.6
0.7 2.0 6.9 26.6 57.6
0.2 0.4 1.9 5.8 12.8
0.6 1.4 4.9 15.6 46.7
1.3 3.3 8.8 40.4 113.1
0.3 1.1 4.1 14.5 23.5
0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 2.0
0.3 0.4 1.8 5.4 10.3
A1-3
-------
Appendix A1. Concentrations of Organic Species Normalized to Larger of Mean Field Blank Value or MDL -
Parameter
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Tricosane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Tetracosane
Pentacosane
Nonadecylcyclohexane
Hexacosane
Eicosylcyclohexane
Heptacosane
Heneicosylcyclohexane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Triacontane
Hentriacontane
Dotriacontane
Tritriacontane
Tetratriacontane
Pentatriacontane
Hexatriacontane
Heptatriacontane
Octatriacontane
Nonatriacontane
Tetracontane
CARBONYLS by DNPH - HPLC/UV
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acetone
acrolein
propionaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
Methacrolein
butyraldehyde
benzaldehyde
glyoxal
valeraldehyde
tolualdehyde
hexanal
Field Blanks
Min Avg Max
0.6 1.0 2.0
0.2 1.0 2.3
0.1 1.0 2.9
0.1 1.0 3.1
0.1 1.0 3.1
0.1 1.0 3.1
0.1 1.0 2.9
0.1 1.0 3.2
0.2 0.5 1.1
0.1 1.0 3.3
0.1 0.8 2.2
0.0 1.0 3.5
0.0 1.0 3.4
0.0 1.0 3.5
0.0 1.0 2.6
0.2 1.0 3.1
0.0 1.0 3.8
0.1 1.0 3.4
0.0 1.0 3.6
0.0 1.0 3.3
0.0 1.0 3.1
0.0 1.0 3.5
0.0 0.8 2.7
0.0 0.6 2.9
0.0 1.0 3.8
0.2 1.0 2.3
0.1 1.0 2.2
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 2.7
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 3.8
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 3.1
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.3 1.6
0.0 0.3 1.6
0.0 0.0 0.0
Dilution Blanks
Min Avg Max
1.5 7.4 31.3
0.9 1.7 2.9
0.5 1.7 4.7
0.2 1.2 3.1
0.6 1.4 2.9
0.5 1.5 3.8
0.4 1.2 3.5
0.4 1.3 3.6
0.4 1.2 3.6
0.3 1.2 3.7
0.4 2.5 7.2
0.4 1.4 3.8
0.3 1.2 3.1
0.3 1.5 3.7
0.5 1.9 5.1
0.6 2.4 6.5
0.7 3.6 12.8
0.8 3.5 12.1
0.8 4.8 17.8
0.7 5.4 22.9
0.0 6.8 26.6
0.9 7.2 31.3
0.0 19.7 116.5
0.0 8.4 42.7
33.4 107.8 251.3
0.2 1.4 3.6
0.2 1.2 2.7
0.0 0.0 0.0
5.0 8.1 11.7
0.0 0.3 2.0
3.4 8.4 14.1
0.0 0.7 4.0
2.7 9.0 21.1
4.0 14.3 36.0
0.0 2.5 4.8
0.8 3.3 6.0
1.6 7.9 20.0
0.0 3.5 12.0
All Vehicle Composites
Min 10th% 50th% 90th% Max
0.1 0.8 4.2 20.8 31.0
0.0 0.3 1.1 2.9 6.9
0.0 0.1 0.8 3.1 7.6
0.1 0.1 0.3 1.5 4.5
0.1 0.1 0.6 2.1 5.5
0.1 0.1 0.5 2.9 6.5
0.1 0.1 0.5 2.6 6.4
0.0 0.1 0.4 2.4 5.4
0.0 0.4 2.8 17.7 164.0
0.0 0.0 0.3 2.4 4.8
0.3 0.9 3.2 25.4 51.0
0.0 0.0 0.5 2.7 8.1
0.0 0.0 0.1 3.7 6.4
0.0 0.0 0.4 3.3 8.8
0.0 0.0 0.8 5.0 10.3
0.0 0.0 0.6 5.5 14.3
0.0 0.0 0.1 11.5 29.9
0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 28.4
0.0 0.0 0.5 14.8 48.3
0.0 0.0 0.0 18.6 53.6
0.0 0.0 0.2 32.6 84.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 40.5 77.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 701.7
0.0 0.0 0.0 66.4 120.1
9.8 66.5 305.5 1045.6 1321.1
0.0 0.9 4.8 11.8 13.3
0.0 0.0 1.6 3.0 3.5
0.0 0.0 1.2 9.2 19.6
1.3 5.7 18.5 52.3 62.7
0.0 0.0 4.0 24.6 44.4
0.9 2.3 9.6 15.3 16.7
0.0 3.4 14.8 59.6 76.4
0.0 4.7 42.2 131.2 218.7
0.4 30.2 92.4 308.7 387.1
0.0 0.0 1.6 10.2 16.0
0.4 0.6 2.4 7.2 12.0
0.4 17.4 53.6 191.9 241.5
0.0 0.0 3.8 22.6 34.4
A1-4
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Gravimetric mass (mg/mi)
Carbon fractions by TOR (ma/mi)
Organic Carbon Fraction 1
Organic Carton Fraction 2
Organic Carton Fraction 3
Organic Carton Fraction 4
Pyrolyzed Organic Carton
Total Organic Carbon
Elemental Carbon Fraction 1
Elemental Carbon Fraction 2
Elemental Carbon Fraction 3
Total Elemental Carton
Total Carbon
Elements bvXRF tmg/mi)
Sodium (gualitative only)
Magnesium (qualitative only)
Aluminum
Silicon
Phosphorous
Sulfur
Chlorine
Potassium
Calcium
Titanium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Iron
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Arsenic
Selenium
Bromine
Rubidium
Strontium
Yttrium
Zirconium
Molybdenum
Palladium
Silver
Cadmium
Indium
Tin
Antimony
Barium
Lanthanum
Gold
Mercury
Thallium
Lead
Uranium
Anions by 1C (mo/mi)
Nitrate Ion
Sulfate Ion
Polvcvclic aromatic hydrocarbons (uo/mile)
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1-methylnaphthalene
Biphenyl
1+2ethylnaphthalene
2,6+2, 7-dimethylnaphthalene
1 ,3+1 ,6+1 ,7dimethylnaphth
1 ,4+1 ,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
1 ,2-dimethylnaphthalene
2-Methylbiphenyl
3-Methylbiphenyl
4-Methylbiphenyl
Dibenzofuran
A-trimethylnaphthalene
1-ethyl-2-methylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphthalene
C-trimethylnaphthalene
2-ethyl-1-methylnaphthalene
E-trimethylnaphthalene
F-trimethylnaphthalene
2,3,5+l-trimethylnaphthalene
SO-1
0.39 ±0.07
0.018 ±0.010
0.073 ±0.01 9
0.105 ±0.040
0.049 ±0.01 6
0.010 ±0.007
0.256 ±0.065
0.025 ±0.009
0.124 ±0.026
0.016 ±0.009
0.154 ±0.036
0.410 ±0.088
0.3761 ±0.0303
0.0062 ± 0.0045
0.0028 ±0.001 9
0.01 56 ±0.0027
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.01 78 ±0.0029
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0020 ± 0.0005
0.0233 ±0.0037
0.0012 ±0.0025
0.0004 ±0.0011
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0011 ±0.0002
0.01 27 ±0.0020
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.0006 ±0.0001
0.0045 ±0.0010
0.0003 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0000 ± 0.0004
0.0004 ± 0.0004
0.0005 ± 0.0004
0.0004 ± 0.0006
0.0002 ±0.0009
0.0002 ±0.0009
0.0007 ± 0.0044
0.0003 ±0.0057
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0000 ± 0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0003 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.02 ±0.00
0.04 ±0.01
51 .97 ±13.99
11. 79 ±1.52
6.10±0.71
1.11 ±0.54
14.45 ±4. 10
4.11 ±0.50
6.45 ±0.73
0.00 ±0.28
0.64 ±0.20
179.69 ±51 .10
56.70 ±14. 36
13.71 ±4.27
1.93±0.16
2.14±0.18
0.48 ±0.1 3
0.85 ±0.16
1.94 ±0.22
0.07 ±0.07
1.59 ±0.1 9
0.88 ±0.11
1 .64 ± 0.30
SO-2
0.53 ±0.11
0.002 ±0.01 5
0.050 ±0.027
0.066 ±0.068
0.015±0.019
0.000 ±0.011
0.1 29 ±0.090
0.000 ±0.008
0.020 ±0.011
0.000 ±0.003
0.020 ±0.014
0.1 50 ±0.096
0.0000 ± 0.0744
0.0068 ±0.01 09
0.0010 ±0.0058
0.01 63 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.001 7
0.0264 ± 0.0043
0.0000 ±0.001 8
0.0024 ±0.0010
0.0221 ±0.0037
0.001 3 ±0.0055
0.0004 ± 0.0024
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0055 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0002 ±0.0002
0.0004 ±0.0014
0.0004 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0002 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0002 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0022 ±0.0097
0.0010±0.0127
0.0007 ±0.0007
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.01 ±0.01
0.05 ± 0.02
30.34 ±38.25
21.11 ±3.75
10. 67 ±1.77
4.69 ±1.62
13.09 ±11. 35
4.72 ±0.99
8.09 ±1.37
0.00 ±0.82
0.63 ±0.52
15. 19 ±140. 98
1.84 ±40.13
0.55 ±12.39
0.81 ±0.16
1.75 ±0.37
0.79 ±0.38
1.72 ±0.44
1 .48 ± 0.39
0.00 ±0.19
1.06 ±0.35
0.89 ±0.22
1.1 7 ±0.45
SO-3
0.19±0.05
0.067 ±0.020
0.093 ±0.024
0.076 ±0.045
0.033 ±0.01 5
0.000 ±0.007
0.268 ±0.074
0.005 ±0.006
0.027 ±0.008
0.000 ±0.002
0.031 ±0.011
0.298 ±0.080
0.0736 ±0.0413
0.0042 ± 0.0072
0.0021 ±0.0031
0.0042 ±0.001 5
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.01 02 ±0.001 7
0.0023 ±0.0011
0.001 5 ±0.0006
0.0086 ±0.0015
0.0021 ±0.0036
0.0008 ±0.001 5
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0002 ±0.0002
0.0061 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.0002 ±0.0001
0.0003 ±0.0009
0.0002 ± 0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0000 ± 0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0007
0.0004 ± 0.0006
0.0004 ± 0.0008
0.0013 ±0.0011
0.0007 ±0.001 3
0.0001 ±0.0063
0.0008 ±0.0082
0.0002 ± 0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0002 ± 0.0005
0.0000 ± 0.0004
0.00 ±0.00
0.03 ±0.01
86. 30 ±18.33
42.88 ±3. 88
20.69 ±1.68
2. 56 ±0.70
17.25±5.13
10.48 ±1.02
13.88 ±1.36
0.00 ±0.35
1.45 ±0.31
85. 19 ±61 .21
28.07 ±17. 39
6. 30 ±5.32
2. 90 ±0.24
3. 20 ±0.24
1.16±0.18
1.16 ±0.21
2.42 ±0.27
2. 15 ±0.30
1.81 ±0.22
1.30 ±0.1 5
3. 13 ±0.52
50-4
0.24 ±0.06
0.073 ±0.022
0.098 ±0.026
0.093 ±0.051
0.029 ±0.01 5
0.000 ±0.008
0.293 ±0.082
0.003 ±0.006
0.028 ±0.009
0.000 ±0.002
0.030 ±0.011
0.323 ±0.088
0.0214 ±0.0503
0.0086 ±0.0072
0.0020 ±0.0036
0.01 29 ±0.0025
0.0008 ±0.0010
0.0243 ±0.0039
0.0006 ±0.001 3
0.0024 ±0.0007
0.01 90 ±0.0031
0.0022 ±0.0040
0.0009 ±0.001 7
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0002
0.0087 ±0.0014
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0003 ±0.0001
0.0009 ±0.0010
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0007
0.0004 ±0.0007
0.0002 ±0.0009
0.0003 ±0.0014
0.0001 ±0.0015
0.0000 ±0.0071
0.0047 ±0.0093
0.0002 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0002 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.01 ±0.01
0.06 ±0.01
63.24 ±21 .33
44. 65 ±4. 17
21 .72 ±1.82
2.61 ±0.86
21 .59 ±6.37
10. 76 ±1.08
14. 78 ±1.49
0.62 ±0.45
1.40 ±0.34
76.21 ±75.59
24.50 ± 21 .48
5.63 ±6. 59
2.42 ±0.21
2.96 ±0.26
1 .40 ± 0.22
1.30 ±0.25
1.93 ±0.26
0.04 ±0.10
1.35 ±0.22
0.89 ±0.14
1.73 ±0.36
SO-5
0.95±0.16
0.085 ±0.028
0.169 ±0.040
0.235 ±0.074
0.450 ±0.1 61
0.001 ±0.009
0.940 ±0.1 97
0.162 ±0.070
0.074 ±0.01 7
0.000 ±0.003
0.235 ±0.060
1.175 ±0.239
0.0760 ± 0.0444
0.0000 ±0.01 03
0.0025 ± 0.0044
0.0361 ±0.0060
0.0004 ±0.0011
0.0281 ±0.0045
0.0000 ±0.0015
0.0036 ±0.0008
0.0297 ± 0.0048
0.0021 ± 0.0044
0.0006 ±0.001 9
0.0003 ± 0.0004
0.0004 ± 0.0002
0.01 67 ±0.0027
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0007 ±0.0002
0.0033 ±0.0012
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0005
0.0000 ± 0.0006
0.0004 ± 0.0008
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0004 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.001 6
0.0017 ±0.0078
0.0006 ±0.01 01
0.0006 ± 0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0005 ± 0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.01 ±0.01
0.07 ±0.01
16. 87 ±27.34
32.83 ±3. 71
16.17±1.68
1.42±1.13
17.76 ±8. 29
6. 05 ±0.86
9. 88 ±1.25
0.00 ±0.58
0.94 ±0.39
37.70 ±101 .25
12.93 ±28. 82
4.42 ±8.89
0.78±0.12
1.69 ±0.27
0.52 ±0.27
1.28 ±0.31
1.03 ±0.27
0.03 ±0.14
0.64 ±0.25
0.65 ±0.15
0.78 ±0.32
SO-6
0.70±0.12
0.068 ±0.01 9
0.207 ±0.042
0.236 ±0.062
0.077 ±0.023
0.000 ±0.007
0.588±0.118
0.047 ±0.01 5
0.089 ±0.01 8
0.007 ±0.004
0.142 ±0.030
0.731 ±0.141
0.01 52 ±0.0464
0.0047 ±0.0069
0.0078 ±0.0035
0.041 7 ±0.0068
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0308 ±0.0049
0.0003 ±0.001 2
0.0045 ±0.0009
0.0404 ± 0.0064
0.0031 ±0.0035
0.0011 ±0.0015
0.0004 ±0.0003
0.0005 ±0.0002
0.0234 ±0.0037
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0009 ±0.0002
0.0027 ±0.0010
0.0005 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0004 ±0.0007
0.0004 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0003 ±0.001 3
0.0000 ±0.0061
0.001 3 ±0.0080
0.0006 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0006 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.01 ±0.00
0.07 ±0.01
72.77 ±17.71
36.76 ± 3.42
17.49 ±1.47
1.91 ±0.68
7.80 ±4. 85
6.43 ±0.71
10.15±1.07
0.00 ±0.35
1.1 3 ±0.27
11 8.72 ±61 .22
38.15 ±17.35
13.83 ±5.30
0.82 ±0.09
1.96 ±0.19
0.51 ±0.16
1.38 ±0.22
1.09 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.08
0.67±0.16
0.55±0.10
0.60 ±0.20
S1-1
9.13±1.46
0.146 ±0.104
0.624 ±0.1 58
0.710 ±0.335
0.732 ±0.240
0.064 ±0.128
2. 204 ±0.501
0.539 ±0.1 57
0.983 ±0.382
0.061 ±0.017
1.516 ±0.244
3. 719 ±0.748
0.461 2 ±0.21 17
0.0498 ±0.0373
0.0138 ±0.0179
1.3756 ±0.21 78
0.0000 ±0.0071
0.2942 ± 0.0467
0.0089 ± 0.0055
0.0120 ±0.0031
0.1785 ±0.0285
0.0039 ±0.01 86
0.0009 ±0.0087
0.0010 ±0.0019
0.0013 ±0.0009
0.0796 ±0.01 27
0.0004 ±0.001 2
0.0002 ± 0.0006
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0133 ±0.0049
0.0009 ±0.0018
0.0005 ±0.001 8
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0015 ±0.0006
0.0004 ± 0.0008
0.0003 ±0.0010
0.0001 ±0.0012
0.0003 ±0.0014
0.0002 ±0.0020
0.0000 ± 0.0027
0.0000 ± 0.0034
0.0013 ±0.0033
0.0013 ±0.0041
0.0015 ±0.0062
0.0056 ± 0.0064
0.0226 ±0.0296
0.0171 ±0.0422
0.0009 ± 0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0001 ±0.0013
0.0007 ±0.0026
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.12±0.03
0.55 ±0.06
3668.07 ±31 5.58
9057.12±719.74
4128.15±286.96
173.89 ±12. 15
450.46 ± 50.54
398.51 ±32.61
825.00 ±67.97
12.19±2.08
151 .52 ±16.56
0.00 ±386. 55
13.96 ±110.37
12.73 ±34. 07
35.23 ±2. 61
37.47 ±2.30
28.1 8 ±1.74
23. 14 ±2.51
16.62 ±1.75
0.55 ±0.50
7.90 ±1.14
5. 19 ±0.67
8.68 ±1.78
S1-2
81 .73 ±12.93
5.721 ±1.614
11.741 ±2.639
4.985 ±1.083
2.753 ±0.870
0.869 ±0.247
26. 070 ±5.077
2.839 ±0.973
15. 778 ±3.456
0.140 ±0.060
17. 884 ±4.524
43. 955 ±8.031
0.2853 ±0.41 97
0.0043 ±0.0765
0.0014 ±0.0464
7.8762 ± 1 .2456
0.0035 ±0.0329
5.01 19 ±0.7925
0.0458 ±0.081 3
0.0029 ±0.0036
0.0367 ±0.0068
0.0084 ±0.0211
0.0025 ±0.0099
0.001 5 ±0.0021
0.0004 ±0.001 2
0.0306 ±0.0053
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0006 ±0.0007
0.0044 ± 0.0009
0.01 92 ±0.0057
0.0000 ±0.0022
0.0003 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.01 37 ±0.0023
0.0001 ±0.0011
0.0001 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.001 5
0.0001 ±0.0017
0.001 3 ±0.0022
0.0003 ±0.0029
0.0029 ±0.0036
0.001 8 ±0.0038
0.001 3 ±0.0046
0.0032 ±0.0071
0.0066 ±0.0074
0.0000 ±0.0369
0.0295 ±0.0486
0.0000 ±0.0026
0.0006 ±0.001 7
0.0002 ±0.001 5
0.001 2 ±0.0029
0.0000 ±0.0025
0.04 ± 0.03
11. 80 ±0.72
344.59 ±121 .20
10694. 90 ±849.77
2909.88 ±202.57
1601 .99 ±101 .76
1143.49±103.49
3866.59 ±31 3.40
5103.07 ±417.51
1901 .46 ±222.34
3042.99 ±330.61
115.97±427.81
1221.95±149.21
510.81 ±43.06
403.69 ±29. 15
3921 .42 ±21 0.70
1322. 89 ±63.72
2454.01 ± 227.47
21 75.20 ±179.32
106.39 ±12. 82
1086.34 ±87.45
1325.33 ±103.59
1374.98 ±201 .59
S2-1
73.07 ±11. 56
26. 889 ±9.41 8
23. 844 ±4.481
6.430 ±1.642
1.966 ±0.542
0.004 ±0.038
59. 132 ±10. 130
1 .955 ±0.604
1.769 ±0.725
0.791 ±0.152
4.510±0.715
63.645 ± 1 1 .023
0.2533 ±0.321 3
0.0071 ±0.0488
0.0058 ±0.01 98
0.1919±0.0315
0.2224 ±0.0356
0.1 804 ±0.0288
0.01 13 ±0.0056
0.0076 ±0.0035
0.5333 ±0.0845
0.0038 ±0.0203
0.001 5 ±0.0087
0.0007 ±0.001 6
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0300 ±0.0052
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0006 ±0.0006
0.0041 ±0.0010
0.3394 ±0.0539
0.0000 ±0.0023
0.0003 ±0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0003 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0000 ±0.001 6
0.0059 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0029
0.0006 ±0.0038
0.0007 ±0.0037
0.0009 ±0.0046
0.0000 ±0.0069
0.0014 ±0.0078
0.0097 ±0.0363
0.01 22 ±0.0477
0.0000 ±0.0096
0.0000 ±0.001 6
0.0001 ±0.0015
0.0040 ±0.0028
0.0001 ±0.0024
0.02 ± 0.03
0.19 ±0.05
6930.77 ± 562.74
22937.43 ±1820.50
11 646.48 ±808.31
143.47 ±10.48
2151.09±183.89
3056.97 ± 247.83
5014.37 ±410.24
1067.76 ±124.94
1343.09 ±145.97
0.00 ±407.34
41 .99 ±116. 55
26.62 ±35.96
39. 98 ±2.96
209.19 ±11.38
63.76 ±3.31
122.65 ±11. 59
94.60 ± 7.99
5.72 ±0.93
50.02 ±4.22
44.36 ±3. 58
49.34 ±7. 52
S2-2
20.11 ±3.19
3. 293 ±0.982
2. 957 ±0.651
3. 662 ±0.81 8
1.416 ±0.455
0.004 ±0.036
11. 332 ±2.238
2.676 ±0.958
3.840 ± 0.742
0.077 ±0.045
6.588 ± 1 .483
17.921 ±3.386
0.4555 ±0.1 947
0.0063 ± 0.0469
0.0053 ±0.0203
0.8379 ±0.1 329
0.0068 ±0.0068
0.1 926 ±0.0307
0.0170 ±0.0057
0.0048 ± 0.0032
0.0582 ±0.0098
0.0083 ±0.01 90
0.0035 ±0.0082
0.0019 ±0.0013
0.0003 ±0.0010
0.0246 ± 0.0044
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0002 ± 0.0007
0.001 6 ±0.0007
0.0251 ±0.0060
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0001 ±0.0018
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0015 ±0.0007
0.0005 ±0.0009
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0004 ±0.001 3
0.0007 ±0.0015
0.0003 ±0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0027
0.0011 ±0.0036
0.0004 ± 0.0035
0.0000 ± 0.0043
0.0000 ±0.0066
0.0000 ±0.0074
0.001 3 ±0.0339
0.0071 ± 0.0443
0.0003 ± 0.0024
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0016 ±0.0027
0.0004 ± 0.0022
0.05 ±0.03
0.38 ±0.06
3860.42 ±331 .21
16855. 38 ±1338. 17
10901 .23 ±756.62
943.96 ±60.20
1495.73 ±130.64
3394.15±275.12
5527.81 ±452.17
1393. 00 ±162.92
2365.94 ± 257.06
0.00 ±398.85
338.35 ±117.39
153.00 ±35.89
47.76 ±3. 51
995.58 ±53.57
415.41 ±20.09
653.79 ±60.73
521.91 ±43.13
28.42 ±3.53
270.10 ±21 .84
273. 23 ±21 .42
304. 76 ±44.87
S2-3
22.02 ±3.49
10.521 ±2.688
4. 153 ±0.840
0.992 ±0.314
0.544 ±0.1 85
0.001 ±0.037
16.21 2 ±3.036
0.619 ±0.246
3. 378 ±0.675
0.037 ±0.024
4.030 ±0.921
20.238 ±3.732
0.2630 ± 0.2848
0.0334 ±0.041 8
0.0055 ±0.01 91
0.1531 ±0.0255
0.1309 ±0.0214
0.1 866 ±0.0298
0.0060 ± 0.0070
0.0062 ±0.0036
0.4863 ± 0.0770
0.0044 ±0.01 91
0.0014 ±0.0095
0.0003 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0376 ±0.0063
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0025 ± 0.0007
0.2395 ±0.0382
0.0034 ±0.001 7
0.0006 ±0.001 7
0.0002 ±0.0008
0.0008 ±0.0006
0.0002 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0004 ±0.0014
0.0005 ± 0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0026
0.0007 ±0.0035
0.0023 ± 0.0034
0.0010 ±0.0040
0.001 8 ±0.0063
0.0000 ±0.0069
0.01 36 ±0.0299
0.0437 ± 0.0432
0.001 9 ±0.0063
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0000 ±0.001 3
0.0024 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.02 ±0.03
0.28 ±0.05
5643.17 ±465.49
3466.37 ±276.58
1721.31 ±120.14
156.34 ±11. 24
228.92 ±39.36
385.60 ±31 .59
665.76 ±55.00
172.71 ±20.40
323.50 ±35.24
0.00 ±411. 15
2. 02 ±117.43
10. 83 ±36.26
43.96 ±3. 24
81 .53 ±4.59
28.37 ±1.79
59.56 ±5.79
48.74 ±4.26
4. 02 ±0.77
25.53 ±2.35
23.73 ±2.00
25. 89 ±4. 16
S2-1
76.16 ±12.04
4.681 ±1.148
7.440 ± 1 .489
9.71 9 ±2. 004
6.344±2.112
0.010 ±0.036
28. 193 ±5.271
4.882 ±1.647
20. 854 ±4.140
0.055 ±0.033
25. 780 ±5.804
53.974 ± 9.734
0.3355 ±0.2622
0.01 34 ±0.0574
0.0000 ±0.0471
9.6254 ±1.5221
0.0083 ±0.01 39
0.9767 ±0.1546
0.0095 ±0.01 63
0.0079 ±0.0035
0.1 270 ±0.0204
0.0085 ±0.01 98
0.0024 ±0.0092
0.0010 ±0.001 9
0.001 7 ±0.0011
0.1 504 ±0.0239
0.0005 ±0.0020
0.0006 ±0.0007
0.0069 ±0.001 2
0.0845 ±0.0142
0.0014±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.001 8
0.0002 ±0.0008
0.0034 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0002 ±0.0010
0.0002 ±0.001 3
0.0003 ±0.001 5
0.0020 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.0028
0.0010 ±0.0037
0.0020 ±0.0036
0.0044 ± 0.0045
0.0029 ±0.0068
0.0010 ±0.0075
0.0045 ± 0.0346
0.0335 ± 0.0454
0.001 7 ±0.0031
0.0002 ±0.001 5
0.0003 ±0.0014
0.0036 ±0.0022
0.0003 ±0.0022
0.02 ± 0.03
1.72±0.12
10067. 38 ±805.41
33748.20 ± 2677.93
19453.82 ±1349.76
836.63 ±53. 53
2848.04 ± 241 .50
7363.69 ±596.57
12006. 78 ±981 .57
2799.25 ±327.23
5682.79 ±61 7.33
0.00 ±442.46
477.88 ±131 .94
211.29 ±40.14
156.12±11.32
1070. 32 ±57.60
282.57 ±13. 72
694.72 ± 64.54
549.29 ±45.41
25.39 ±3.19
312.17±25.23
282.00 ±22. 11
302.81 ±44.61
S3-1
3.76 ±0.61
0.245 ±0.087
0.332 ±0.074
0.267 ±0.154
0.281 ±0.075
0.009 ±0.025
1 .097 ±0.245
0.394 ±0.087
0.541 ±0.155
0.008 ±0.007
0.933 ±0.150
2.030 ±0.383
0.4438 ±0.1 306
0.0445 ±0.01 97
0.0577 ±0.01 32
0.2761 ±0.0439
0.0051 ±0.0033
0.1 660 ±0.0263
0.0011 ±0.0038
0.0068 ±0.0020
0.0566 ±0.0092
0.0046 ±0.01 10
0.0022 ±0.0052
0.0037 ±0.001 3
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0653 ±0.01 04
0.0005 ±0.0008
0.0021 ±0.0005
0.0060 ±0.0010
0.01 74 ±0.0038
0.0004 ±0.001 2
0.0006 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0037 ±0.0007
0.0003 ±0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0014 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0002 ±0.001 5
0.0010 ±0.0020
0.0010 ±0.0020
0.0001 ±0.0024
0.0005 ±0.0036
0.0020 ±0.0041
0.0104±0.0187
0.0206 ±0.0253
0.0008 ±0.0014
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0009 ±0.001 5
0.0001 ±0.0012
0.02 ±0.01
0.48 ± 0.03
1494.87 ±125. 73
3058.24 ± 243.1 1
1462.77±101.72
64. 37 ±4.48
21 6.82 ±21 .66
321 .83 ±26. 34
518.14±42.75
10.02 ±1.65
63.76 ±7.17
188.74 ±134.53
136.46 ±39. 32
37.25 ±11. 80
8.90 ±0.70
30.29 ±1.72
14.74 ±0.84
22.67 ±2.21
15.99 ±1.42
0.71 ±0.22
9.80 ±0.90
6.51 ±0.59
9.18±1.48
B1-1
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
J-trimethylnaphthalene
1 ,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Dibenzothiophene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
A-methylfluorene
1-methylfluorene
B-methylfluorene
9-fluorenone
Xanthone
Acenaphthenequinone
Perinaphthenone
2-methyl anthracene
3-methyl phenanthrene
2-methylphenanthrene
9-methyiphenanthrene
1-methylphenanthrene
Anthrone
Anthraquinone
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene
A-dimethylphenanthrene
B-dimethyiphenanthrene
C-dimethylphenanthrene
D-dimethylphenanthrene
1 ,7-dimethylphenanthrene
E-dimethylphenanthrene
9-methylanthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
9-Anthraaldehyde
Retene
Benzonaphthothiophene
1 +3-methylfluoranthene
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py
B-MePy/MeFI
C-MePy/MeFI
D-MePy/MeFI
4-methylpyrene
1-methyipyrene
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene
Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Triphenylene
Chrysene
Benzanthrone
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
3-methyl chrysene
Benz(a)anthracene-7,1 2-dione
5+6-methylchrysene
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)fluoranthene
BeP
BaP
Perylene
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
Dibenzo(aj)anthracene
lndeno[1 23-cd]pyrene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Benzo(b)chrysene
Picene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Anthanthrene
Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Coronene
Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene
nitro-PAH (uq/milel
1-nitronaphthalene
2-nitronaphthalene
2-nitrobiphenyi
3-nitrobiphenyi
4-nitrobiphenyl
2-nitrofluorene
1 ,3-dinitronaphthalene
SO-1
0.41 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.83 ±0.07
0.28 ±0.17
3. 23 ±0.34
1.06 ±0.26
0.37 ±0.07
3. 19 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.04
0.87±0.12
0.82 ±0.14
0.17±0.05
0.06 ±0.05
0.03 ±0.08
0.18 ±0.07
0.05 ±0.10
0.36 ±0.09
0.66 ±0.07
0.81 ±0.10
0.43±0.10
0.38 ±0.09
0.19 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.04
0.38 ±0.32
0.14 ±0.05
0.09 ±0.03
0.33 ±0.05
0.10 ±0.03
0.16±0.04
0.10±0.04
0.32 ±0.11
0.77 ±0.18
0.89 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.05
0.06 ±0.04
0.1 6 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.03
0.09 ±0.03
0.11 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.02 ±0.03
0.37 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.04
0.10 ±0.08
0.13±0.04
0.09 ±0.05
0.10±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.01 ±0.03
0.04 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
1 .34 ± 0.43
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.03
0.45 ±0.36
0.02 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.03
0.06 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.0027
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0000 ± 0.0476
SO-2
0.35 ±0.20
0.47 ±0.25
0.27±0.11
1.73 ±0.54
0.05 ±0.55
0.17±0.62
0.36 ±0.14
4.63 ±0.66
0.13±0.12
0.77 ±0.26
0.69 ±0.23
0.18±0.13
0.13±0.13
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.28
0.66±0.19
1.03 ±0.1 6
1.26 ±0.23
0.65 ±0.20
0.55 ±0.19
0.08±0.11
0.09 ±0.13
1.05 ±0.93
0.47 ±0.1 6
0.30 ±0.08
0.93 ±0.14
0.29±0.10
0.52 ±0.11
0.40±0.13
0.06 ±0.17
6.11 ±0.64
12.31 ±1.57
0.01 ±0.08
0.00±0.11
0.10±0.16
0.25±0.13
0.71 ±0.13
0.83 ±0.22
0.73±0.13
0.69±0.10
0.72 ±0.19
0.92 ±0.50
0.51 ±0.12
11. 70 ±2. 10
0.59 ±0.21
0.86 ±0.31
0.31 ±0.10
1.06 ±0.21
0.58±0.10
0.00 ±0.08
0.08 ±0.08
0.19±0.08
0.03 ±0.09
0.74 ± 1 .09
0.00 ±0.08
0.18±0.12
0.52 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.95
0.09 ±0.10
0.02 ±0.08
0.12±0.10
0.19±0.11
0.08 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.40
0.03 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.12
0.05 ±0.08
0.04 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.08
0.0033 ±0.0045
0.001 6 ±0.0078
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.0059
0.0052 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.1401
SO-3
0.46±0.10
0.05 ±0.10
0.66 ±0.07
1 .40 ± 0.26
0.33 ±0.24
2. 35 ±0.41
0.47 ±0.08
5.72 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.05
0.61 ±0.12
1.22 ±0.20
0.05 ±0.05
0.24 ±0.07
0.14 ±0.12
0.28 ±0.10
0.27 ±0.15
1 .70 ± 0.34
1.19 ±0.10
1.50±0.16
0.69±0.15
0.66 ±0.14
0.20 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.06
0.58 ±0.40
0.32 ±0.09
0.1 7 ±0.04
0.58 ± 0.07
0.19 ±0.05
0.34 ±0.05
0.24 ±0.07
0.49 ±0.1 5
2. 05 ±0.25
2.69 ± 0.44
0.17 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.05
0.07 ±0.07
0.07 ±0.04
0.28 ±0.05
0.37±0.10
0.29 ±0.05
0.34 ±0.04
0.34 ±0.08
0.52 ±0.26
0.24 ±0.05
3.08 ±0.67
0.25 ±0.09
0.85 ±0.19
0.61 ±0.11
0.67 ±0.11
0.55 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.04
0.14 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.04
1 .82 ± 0.54
0.02 ±0.04
0.27 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.11
0.02 ±0.04
0.32 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.04 ±0.04
0.10 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00±0.17
0.00 ±0.03
0.62 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.0000 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0000 ± 0.0025
0.0000 ±0.0013
0.0000 ± 0.0599
50-4
0.30 ±0.11
0.09 ±0.12
0.52 ±0.07
1.41 ±0.30
0.25 ±0.30
0.69 ±0.35
0.35 ±0.08
5.60 ±0.40
0.03 ±0.06
1.21 ±0.17
1.04±0.19
0.25 ±0.09
0.73±0.11
0.27 ±0.17
0.45 ±0.15
0.26 ±0.17
1.53 ±0.31
1.33 ±0.1 2
1.64±0.18
0.65±0.15
0.97 ±0.19
0.18±0.09
0.08 ±0.07
0.34 ± 0.49
0.38 ±0.11
0.21 ±0.05
0.74 ±0.09
0.27 ±0.06
0.40 ±0.07
0.25 ±0.07
1.1 3 ±0.30
2.41 ±0.31
2.84 ±0.51
0.03 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.08
0.15±0.07
0.45 ±0.07
0.43 ±0.11
0.38 ±0.06
0.40 ±0.05
0.38 ±0.09
0.67 ±0.33
0.38 ±0.08
3.40 ±0.78
0.29±0.10
0.81 ±0.20
0.54 ±0.11
0.92 ±0.14
0.96 ±0.11
0.02 ±0.05
0.15±0.05
0.31 ±0.05
0.07 ±0.06
1.95 ±0.65
0.00 ±0.04
0.22 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.13
0.09 ±0.07
0.20 ±0.52
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.05
0.01 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.04
0.19±0.15
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.0000 ± 0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0042
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.001 6
0.0000 ± 0.0744
SO-5
0.22 ±0.14
0.19 ±0.17
0.01 ±0.07
0.95 ±0.37
0.01 ±0.39
0.41 ±0.45
0.16 ±0.10
3.83 ±0.48
0.25 ±0.09
0.86 ±0.20
0.74±0.19
0.22±0.10
0.26 ±0.10
0.01 ±0.15
0.16 ±0.12
0.50 ±0.25
0.49 ±0.1 3
0.96 ±0.12
1.19±0.18
0.49 ±0.14
0.48 ±0.14
0.06 ±0.08
0.50 ±0.17
0.80 ±0.67
0.33 ±0.10
0.18 ±0.06
0.50 ± 0.08
0.17 ±0.06
0.30 ±0.07
0.22 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.12
1.88 ±0.38
2.40 ±0.59
0.03 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.08
0.05 ±0.11
0.18 ±0.09
0.52 ±0.09
0.39±0.12
0.38 ±0.07
0.35 ±0.06
0.28 ±0.09
0.75 ±0.39
0.28 ±0.07
3.82 ±0.96
0.31 ±0.13
0.86 ±0.24
0.96±0.17
0.81 ±0.15
1.04 ±0.1 3
0.01 ±0.06
0.11 ±0.06
0.45 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.08
1.03 ±0.80
0.00 ±0.06
0.48±0.10
0.09±0.18
0.09 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.68
0.07 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.19±0.29
0.00 ±0.06
0.28 ±0.21
0.01 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.06
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0056
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ± 0.0043
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.1 004
SO-6
0.16±0.09
0.23±0.11
0.01 ±0.04
2.16±0.30
0.46 ± 0.24
0.81 ±0.29
0.15±0.06
4.61 ±0.32
0.30 ±0.06
0.83±0.13
0.59±0.13
0.17±0.07
0.08 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.09
0.02 ±0.06
0.29±0.16
0.50±0.12
0.87 ±0.08
1.09±0.13
0.50±0.11
0.50±0.11
0.00 ±0.04
0.31 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.38
0.27 ±0.08
0.16±0.04
0.45 ±0.06
0.14 ±0.04
0.28 ±0.05
0.19±0.06
0.05 ±0.08
2.57 ±0.27
3.72 ±0.52
0.03 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.06 ±0.07
0.31 ±0.11
0.37 ±0.06
0.43±0.10
0.39 ±0.06
0.38 ±0.04
0.31 ±0.08
0.26 ±0.15
0.29 ±0.06
4.91 ±0.87
0.31 ±0.10
0.88±0.19
0.99±0.16
1.15±0.15
0.94±0.11
0.00 ±0.04
0.10±0.04
0.30 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.30 ±0.46
0.00 ±0.03
0.38 ±0.07
0.07 ±0.11
0.02 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.03
0.01 ±0.03
0.04 ± 0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.11 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.03
0.03 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.0000 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0025
0.0001 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0594
S1-1
1.16 ±0.53
3. 84 ±0.86
1.88 ±0.26
147. 18 ±10.78
57.53 ±4.57
35.69 ±4.62
1.03 ±0.33
94.47 ± 3.87
9. 54 ±1.03
12.97 ±1.23
15.75±2.18
2. 37 ±0.52
9. 59 ±1.05
0.00 ±0.52
0.68 ±0.39
1.71 ±0.93
3.57 ±0.73
8.94 ±0.65
10.38 ±1.02
3.81 ±0.76
4. 70 ±0.88
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±2.47
1 .30 ± 0.34
0.87 ±0.14
1 .70 ± 0.24
0.60 ±0.16
1.18±0.18
0.62 ±0.19
0.21 ±0.45
18.31 ±1.69
19.66 ±2.97
0.00 ±0.14
0.01 ±0.18
0.03 ±0.25
0.32 ±0.18
0.84±0.17
0.80 ±0.33
0.61 ±0.17
0.41 ±0.17
0.37 ±0.19
0.02 ±0.41
0.11 ±0.13
2.90 ±2.92
2.02 ±0.60
0.89 ±0.46
0.28±0.15
0.31 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.15
0.15 ±0.13
0.14 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
1.1 7 ±2.96
0.62 ±0.24
0.82 ±0.28
0.93 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.13
5. 95 ±3.05
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.76 ±0.28
0.07 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
7.54 ± 1 .43
0.26 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.13
3. 77 ±0.68
0.00 ±0.13
0.1 327 ±0.01 88
0.3245 ±0.0380
0.0625 ±0.0089
0.0000 ± 0.0072
0.0000 ± 0.0245
0.0000 ±0.0143
0.0000 ± 0.3734
S1-2
481 .76 ±41 .74
202.90 ±28. 12
241.81 ±13.86
70.56 ± 5.28
87.11 ±6.70
514.66 ±58. 92
3.34 ±0.51
1074.76 ±37.94
373.63 ±37. 72
523.22 ± 39.37
21 3.44 ±27. 33
22.1 2 ±3.90
62.66 ±6.26
6.25 ±2. 37
16.69 ±4.45
5.43 ± 1 .63
89.95 ±16.61
260.33 ±15.57
264.64 ± 21 .52
189.08±31.14
96.51 ±14.99
13.08 ±4.02
0.03 ±0.32
38.48 ± 5.21
57.99 ±11. 98
28.12±1.83
98.17±8.16
18.27 ±2. 61
65.31 ±6.37
35.47 ±6.88
6.53 ±1.65
277.25 ±14. 80
450.29 ±47. 23
5.43 ± 1 .20
0.15±0.20
0.70 ±0.31
26.55 ±7. 96
16. 94 ±1.83
26.43 ±4.73
22.1 7 ±2.22
13.82 ±0.62
12.71 ±2.30
11. 26 ±4.99
5.79 ±0.82
109.92 ±16.62
128.03 ±26.34
24.1 8 ±4.09
9.81 ±1.56
9.61 ±1.23
0.00 ±0.14
0.29 ±0.22
4.96 ±0.72
4.99 ±0.30
1.06 ±0.57
71 .70 ±9.35
3.04 ±0.87
48. 73 ±5.55
40. 15 ±7.54
10.82 ±4.31
14.61 ±4.39
0.07 ±0.16
1.93 ±0.22
52.25 ± 9.83
4.57 ±1.23
1.68±0.15
3.07 ±1.21
224.69 ± 27.28
20.83 ±3.97
5.76 ±2.46
5.83 ± 1 .24
96.48 ±16.07
0.89 ±0.25
0.51 63 ±0.0348
0.5477 ±0.0570
0.1 343 ±0.01 25
0.021 5 ±0.01 36
0.0000 ±0.0270
0.0000 ±0.01 58
0.0000 ±0.41 17
S2-1
17.09 ±1.63
14.37 ±2. 19
12.55 ±0.77
231 .10 ±16.86
30.66 ± 2.83
82.27 ± 9.78
4.90 ±0.62
145.91 ±5.58
28.61 ±2.93
49. 86 ±3.89
34.94 ±4.60
13.1 3 ±2.34
11.94±1.27
0.00 ±0.54
0.19±0.32
1.83 ±0.98
20.52 ± 3.84
33.02 ±2. 04
37. 29 ±3. 15
22.22 ±3.75
17.55 ±2.83
0.35 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.29
3.06 ±2.67
7.50 ±1.60
3.54 ±0.27
14.00 ±1.21
3.01 ±0.46
8.69 ±0.87
4.37 ±0.88
1.75 ±0.65
26.31 ±2.03
24.33 ± 3.43
1.21 ±0.34
0.01 ±0.19
0.18±0.27
4.70 ± 1 .45
3.01 ±0.36
4.49 ±0.89
3.73 ±0.42
2.05 ±0.20
1 .78 ± 0.40
0.49 ±0.55
0.71 ±0.19
5.76 ±3.20
3.94 ±0.98
3.54 ±0.79
1.23 ±0.26
1.14±0.31
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.16
1.15±0.21
0.19±0.13
0.12±0.19
5.92 ±3.28
0.57 ±0.23
2.65 ±0.45
3.77 ±0.90
0.74 ±0.39
4.82 ±3. 08
0.00 ±0.13
0.00±0.13
2.46 ±0.58
0.00±0.15
0.07±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
8.47 ± 1 .55
0.75 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.41
0.17±0.14
2.1 6 ±0.44
0.00±0.13
0.0952 ±0.01 88
0.1991 ±0.0303
0.0222 ±0.0082
0.0000 ±0.0077
0.0000 ±0.0259
0.0000 ±0.01 51
0.0000 ±0.3939
S2-2
98.41 ±8.59
72.46 ±10.12
71.36±4.10
592. 56 ±43.05
195. 72 ±14.44
504. 84 ±57.78
10.22±1.10
661 .48 ± 23.44
181.91 ±18.38
296.78 ±22.37
174.93 ±22.42
74.64 ±12.97
85.28 ±8.48
1 .87 ± 1 .00
8. 25 ±2.27
4.44 ± 1 .40
134. 83 ±24.86
153.84 ±9. 22
157.03 ±12.81
125.26 ±20.66
64.91 ±10.11
4. 85 ±1.53
0.25 ±0.32
21.41 ±3.64
31.61 ±6.54
14.42 ±0.95
59.41 ±4.95
9. 93 ±1.43
42.11 ±4.11
19.42 ±3. 78
10.1 2 ±2.45
111.82±6.15
140. 35 ±15.00
7.44 ± 1 .61
0.02 ±0.18
0.43 ±0.28
13. 32 ±4.01
9. 82 ±1.07
13.22 ±2.40
10.60 ±1.09
7. 30 ±0.36
5. 96 ±1.11
3.14 ±1.54
2. 57 ±0.40
27.54 ±5.22
27.42 ± 5.74
12.29±2.14
4. 75 ±0.78
4. 88 ±0.68
0.00 ±0.13
0.30 ±0.21
3.44 ±0.51
2. 35 ±0.18
0.77 ±0.43
24.79 ±4.51
2.32 ±0.67
15.91 ±1.89
11.11 ±2.19
3. 07 ±1.29
12.19±3.90
0.05 ±0.14
0.68 ±0.15
13.36 ±2.60
1 .44 ± 0.46
0.57 ±0.13
0.87 ± 0.43
69.89 ±8. 66
7.49 ± 1 .45
1.28 ±0.86
1 .87 ± 0.43
29.78 ±4.98
0.03 ±0.13
0.1487 ±0.0197
0.1881 ±0.0292
0.0876 ±0.0100
0.0393 ±0.01 88
0.0000 ± 0.0253
0.0000 ±0.0148
0.0000 ±0.3858
S2-3
6. 04 ±0.79
6. 37 ±1.1 7
8. 26 ±0.55
443.68 ±32.26
41. 65 ±3.55
109. 53 ±12.85
8.47 ± 0.94
281 .34 ±10.20
47.82 ±4. 87
31 .85 ±2. 57
26.53 ±3. 54
9. 87 ±1.78
6. 57 ±0.77
0.00 ±0.55
1.11 ±0.49
1 .49 ± 0.95
11.65±2.21
25.86 ±1.62
31 .23 ±2. 67
17.38 ±2. 96
13.57 ±2.23
1.77 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.29
2. 33 ±2.68
4.62 ±1.00
2.26 ±0.21
7.66 ± 0.69
2.16±0.35
4. 80 ±0.51
2. 84 ±0.59
0.98 ±0.55
71 .84 ±4. 13
62.84 ±7. 10
0.54 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.19
0.40 ±0.29
1.73 ±0.57
3. 28 ±0.39
3.91 ±0.79
3.49 ±0.39
2. 29 ±0.20
1.70 ±0.38
1 .36 ± 0.84
2. 04 ±0.33
21. 68 ±4.60
11. 99 ±2.60
8. 57 ±1.55
4. 92 ±0.81
4. 77 ±0.67
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.16
1 .36 ± 0.24
0.00 ±0.13
0.11 ±0.18
21. 83 ±4.34
1.65 ±0.50
7. 86 ±1.00
7. 76 ±1.59
1.70 ±0.77
4. 52 ±3.08
0.00 ±0.14
0.18 ±0.13
3. 10 ±0.70
2. 12 ±0.62
0.59 ±0.13
0.27 ± 0.24
20.59 ±2. 85
1.58 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.32
0.20 ±0.14
7.24 ± 1 .24
0.03 ±0.13
0.0567 ±0.0183
0.0705 ±0.0242
0.0000 ±0.0080
0.0301 ±0.0160
0.0282 ±0.0263
0.0000 ±0.01 53
0.0000 ±0.3975
S2-1
89. 63 ±7.84
86.92 ±12. 14
56.66 ±3.27
834.99 ±60. 63
292.04 ± 21 .42
429.36 ±49. 21
12.76 ±1.36
660.84 ± 23.46
136.44 ±13.80
150.68 ±11. 43
94.65 ±12.21
35. 26 ±6. 17
25.07 ±2.56
0.00 ±0.54
9.27 ±2. 54
6.59 ±1.87
38.87 ± 7.22
79.91 ±4.82
85. 02 ±7.01
65.07 ±10.79
33.78 ±5.34
3.30 ±1.08
0.00 ±0.32
14.05 ±3.37
15.93 ±3.33
7.45 ±0.51
30.94 ±2. 60
5.70 ±0.83
20. 09 ±1.98
10.46 ±2.05
3.08 ±0.93
182.01 ±9.82
272.01 ±28.71
1.95 ±0.50
0.02 ±0.20
0.43 ±0.31
8.01 ±2.43
5.92 ±0.67
7.93 ±1.49
6.85 ±0.72
5.47 ±0.31
6.88 ±1.27
3.89 ±1.88
3.36 ±0.51
79.87 ±12.39
50.35 ±10.45
10. 58 ±1.89
5.42 ±0.89
4.59 ±0.67
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.17
1.63 ±0.27
1.12±0.16
0.18±0.21
134.84 ±16. 38
1.1 3 ±0.37
26. 32 ±3.05
21 .20 ±4.05
14.71 ±5.84
60.02 ±12.58
0.89 ±0.46
0.38 ±0.15
28.45 ± 5.42
0.25 ±0.21
0.40 ±0.14
0.71 ±0.39
147.95 ±18. 06
12. 75 ±2.44
0.18±0.54
4.38 ±0.94
78.50 ±13.08
2.09 ±0.51
0.2111 ±0.0232
0.5949 ±0.0614
0.0644 ± 0.0099
0.0491 ±0.0227
0.0000 ±0.0281
0.0000 ±0.01 64
0.0000 ±0.4275
S3-1
2.09 ±0.29
0.29 ±0.23
2.25 ±0.18
34.41 ±2.75
6.99 ±0.82
19.65 ±2.41
3.09 ±0.37
58.37 ± 2.20
1.65 ±0.22
8.67 ±0.74
8.06 ±1.11
1.97 ±0.40
10.85±1.12
0.05 ±0.21
0.76 ±0.27
0.08 ±0.27
4.42 ±0.86
8.02 ±0.54
9.29 ±0.82
3.40 ±0.62
3.85 ±0.67
0.08 ±0.10
0.00±0.11
0.75 ±0.86
1 .44 ± 0.34
0.81 ±0.10
2.17±0.23
0.68 ±0.14
1.19±0.16
0.76±0.19
0.73 ±0.27
5.91 ±0.61
5.89 ±0.98
0.03 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.10
0.02 ±0.14
0.23±0.12
0.15±0.08
0.37±0.15
0.30 ±0.09
0.32 ±0.08
0.31 ±0.12
1.11 ±0.57
0.09 ±0.08
0.94 ± 1 .00
0.01 ±0.12
0.25 ±0.23
0.11 ±0.08
0.37±0.13
0.34 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
0.05 ±0.07
0.24 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.07
1 .22 ± 1 .04
0.09 ±0.08
0.33±0.12
0.12±0.24
0.00 ±0.07
1 .55 ± 1 .00
0.03 ±0.08
0.02 ±0.07
0.24 ±0.10
0.15±0.09
0.08 ±0.07
0.07 ±0.09
0.91 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.07
0.28±0.11
0.02 ±0.07
0.0062 ±0.0043
0.0353 ±0.0081
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0056
0.001 3 ±0.0028
0.0000 ±0.1 31 7
B1-2
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
1 ,5-dinitronaphthalene
5-nitroacenaphthene
9-nitroanthracene
4-nitrophenanthrene
9-nitrophenanthrene
1 ,8-dinitronaphthalene
2-nitrofluoranthene
3-nitrofluoranthene
1-nitropyrene
7-nitrobenzo(a)anthracene
6-nitrochrysene
6-nitrobenz[a]pyrene
Hooanes (ua/milel
1 8a(H),21 G(H)-22,29,30-Trisnortiopane &
1 7a(H),21 G(H)-22,29,30-Trisnortiopane
1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30-Norhopane
17a(H),21G(H)-Hopane
17G(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30-Homohopane
17G(H),21G(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21G(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan>
22R-17a(H),21G(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22S-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30,31 ,32-Trisomohop:
22R-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30,31 ,32-Trishomoho
Steranes (ua/milel
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14G(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-cholestane
ster45440(cholestane)
C28-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan<
C29-20R5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-stigmastan
C29-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-stigmastam
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastam
Alkanes (ua/milel
Dodecane
Tridecane
Norfamesane
Heptylcyclohexane
Famesane
Tetradecane
Octylcyclohexane
Pentadecane
Nonylcyclohexane
Hexadecane
Norpristane
Heptadecane
Decylcyclohexane
Heptadecane_Pristane
Undecylcyclohexane
Octadecane
Phytane
Dodecylcyclohexane
Nonadecane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Eicosane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Heneicosane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Docosane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Tricosane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Tetracosane
Pentacosane
Nonadecylcyclohexane
Hexacosane
Eicosylcyclohexane
Heptacosane
Heneicosylcyclohexane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Triacontane
Hentriacontane
Dotriacontane
SO-1
0.0000 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0041
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ± 0.0074
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0000 ± 0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0026
0.20 ±0.05
0.02 ±0.03
0.23 ±0.06
0.10±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.06 ±0.03
0.03 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.04 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.06 ±0.03
0.03 ±0.03
0.09 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.01 ±0.03
0.01 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.00 ±1.11
0.52 ±0.48
1.18±0.32
0.80 ±0.31
2. 17 ±1.08
0.00 ±2.07
0.00 ±0.61
24.95 ± 2.74
0.14 ±0.90
0.00 ±1.37
1.20 ±0.46
11.12±1.62
1.64 ±0.62
10.50 ±1.43
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ± 0.44
0.22 ±0.20
0.40 ±0.1 5
3.56 ±0.47
0.00 ±0.14
4. 73 ±0.40
0.56 ±0.14
2. 22 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.82
1 .67 ± 1 .29
0.03 ±0.04
2. 37 ±1.68
0.38 ±0.74
0.00 ±0.63
1.24 ±2.89
1.57±3.18
0.20 ±0.78
1.38 ±3.58
0.00 ±0.03
0.92 ±3.57
0.03 ±0.04
2.25 ±3.47
2.34 ±2.51
3. 66 ±2.21
4.24 ± 1 .73
4. 20 ±1.1 3
SO-2
0.0000 ±0.0056
0.0008 ±0.0022
0.0082 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0040
0.0005 ±0.01 21
0.0000 ±0.0036
0.001 9 ±0.0220
0.0000 ±0.0095
0.0037 ±0.0059
0.0004 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.001 6
0.0000 ±0.0076
0.19±0.13
0.02 ±0.08
0.24±0.12
0.11 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.08
0.09 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.08
0.09 ±0.08
0.05 ±0.08
0.04 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±2. 98
0.00 ±1.26
0.1 8 ±0.44
0.00 ±0.39
0.00±1.11
0.00 ±6. 09
0.00 ±1.80
0.53 ±3. 10
0.00 ±2.59
2.53 ±4. 07
1.23 ±0.99
21. 19 ±3.83
0.00 ±1.10
20.40 ±3.78
5.27 ±1.62
47.03 ± 3.79
20.78 ±1.99
2.66 ±0.83
20.94 ±2.42
3.23 ±0.98
16. 07 ±1.28
1.52 ±0.38
16.28 ±1.37
1.00 ±2.44
14.51 ±4.11
5.77 ±0.92
10.99 ±4.99
7.41 ±3.03
3.12±2.16
12. 95 ±8.90
20.76 ±10.71
4.74 ±2. 71
21 .23 ± 1 1 .64
0.22 ±0.10
20.68 ±11. 67
0.46 ±0.21
19.34 ±10.67
10.28 ±7.68
8.09 ±6. 29
6.79 ±4. 17
5.57 ±2. 84
SO-3
0.0000 ± 0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0005 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0017
0.0000 ±0.0052
0.0000 ±0.001 6
0.0000 ±0.0093
0.0000 ± 0.0040
0.0006 ±0.0025
0.0000 ± 0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0000 ± 0.0032
0.28 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.03
0.33 ±0.07
0.17±0.06
0.01 ±0.03
0.09 ±0.04
0.07 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.03
0.03 ±0.03
0.04 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.03
0.09 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.01 ±0.03
0.01 ±0.03
0.03 ±0.03
0.03 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.03
0.03 ±0.03
0.58 ±1.52
0.51 ±0.59
2. 65 ±0.62
0.70 ±0.32
0.40 ±0.59
0.00 ±2.63
1.88 ±0.88
5. 16 ±1.47
0.30 ±1.1 5
1.89 ±1.75
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±1.1 2
0.63 ±0.53
0.00 ± 1 .42
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.55
5.80 ±0.60
0.60 ±0.22
2. 08 ±0.36
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.34
0.13 ±0.05
1.61 ±0.39
0.00 ± 1 .04
0.99 ±1.60
0.10 ±0.06
0.53 ±2. 10
0.00 ±0.90
0.00 ±0.80
0.00 ±3.60
0.00 ±3.92
0.00 ±0.96
0.00 ±4.42
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±4.43
0.02 ±0.04
0.00 ±4.31
0.00 ±2.96
0.03 ±2.51
0.58 ±1.52
0.65 ±1.14
50-4
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.001 7
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.0064
0.0000 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.01 16
0.0000 ±0.0050
0.0006 ±0.0031
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0040
0.22 ± 0.07
0.01 ±0.04
0.23 ±0.07
0.08 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.04
0.04 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.04 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.59
0.00 ±0.68
0.03 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.21
1.07 ±0.88
0.00 ±3. 23
0.00 ±0.97
11.21 ±2.08
0.00 ±1.37
0.33±2.15
0.23 ±0.47
0.00 ±1.38
0.00 ±0.58
0.00 ±1.76
0.00 ±0.24
4.01 ±0.79
2.49 ±0.41
0.42 ±0.1 8
2.29 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.22
2.02 ±0.46
0.26 ±0.08
1 .66 ± 0.48
0.00 ±1.29
1 .03 ± 1 .98
0.21 ±0.08
0.49 ±2.60
0.76 ±1.1 8
0.00 ±1.00
0.00 ±4.46
0.00 ±4. 83
0.00 ±1.19
0.00 ±5.47
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±5.48
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±5.33
0.00 ±3.65
0.00 ±3. 09
0.00 ±1.81
0.32 ± 1 .40
SO-5
0.0000 ± 0.0040
0.0000 ±0.0016
0.0000 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0028
0.0000 ±0.0087
0.0000 ±0.0026
0.0000 ±0.01 56
0.0000 ±0.0068
0.001 3 ±0.0041
0.0002 ± 0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ± 0.0054
0.33±0.10
0.01 ±0.06
0.59±0.13
0.33±0.10
0.01 ±0.06
0.20 ±0.07
0.14 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.06
0.12±0.06
0.10 ±0.06
0.09 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.06
0.14 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.06
0.18 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.06
0.03 ± 0.06
0.05 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.06
0.06 ±0.06
0.06 ±0.06
0.00 ±2. 14
0.00 ±0.91
0.00 ±0.31
0.30 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.80
12.40 ±5.57
0.03 ±1.31
0.00 ±2.21
0.00 ±1.85
15.59 ±3. 20
3.66±1.18
14.04 ±2.66
1.85 ±1.01
14.35 ±2.70
0.46 ± 0.42
3.34 ± 1 .00
2.53 ±0.50
0.39 ±0.20
1.65 ±0.47
0.00 ±0.31
0.58 ±0.58
0.15 ±0.08
1.27 ±0.63
0.00 ± 1 .74
0.19 ±2.66
0.30 ±0.12
0.00 ±3.50
0.00 ±1.49
0.00 ±1.32
0.00 ±6.00
0.00 ±6.49
0.00 ±1.60
0.00 ±7.36
0.04 ±0.06
0.00 ±7.38
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±7. 18
0.00 ±4.91
0.00 ±4. 16
0.00 ±2.41
0.00 ±1.87
SO-6
0.0000 ±0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0002 ±0.001 3
0.0000 ±0.001 7
0.0000 ±0.0051
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.0092
0.0000 ±0.0040
0.0000 ±0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.40 ± 0.07
0.02 ±0.03
0.66±0.12
0.42 ±0.07
0.03 ±0.03
0.17±0.04
0.12±0.04
0.06 ±0.03
0.10±0.04
0.07 ±0.03
0.06 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.03
0.10±0.04
0.17±0.04
0.12±0.03
0.31 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.03
0.07 ±0.03
0.08 ±0.04
0.09 ±0.03
0.08 ±0.03
0.09 ±0.04
0.07 ±0.03
0.10±0.03
0.00 ±1.40
0.69 ±0.60
0.34 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.48
0.00 ±2. 57
0.00 ±0.76
9.37 ±1.69
0.00 ±1.10
4.76 ±1.78
2.26 ±0.72
8.76 ±1.60
0.00 ±0.46
11.52±1.72
0.39 ±0.27
3.55 ±0.65
2.37 ±0.35
0.18±0.11
2.06 ±0.36
0.00±0.18
1.83 ±0.37
0.10±0.05
1 .97 ± 0.40
0.37 ±1.04
1 .68 ± 1 .60
0.14 ±0.06
2.00 ±2.09
0.00 ±0.90
0.52 ±0.83
1.56 ±3. 60
0.36 ±3. 89
0.00 ±0.96
0.00 ±4. 38
0.02 ±0.03
0.00 ±4.37
0.09 ±0.06
0.00 ±4.25
0.00 ±2. 91
0.00 ±2.46
0.00 ± 1 .42
0.00±1.11
S1-1
0.0000 ± 0.0276
0.0000 ± 0.0086
0.0000 ±0.01 66
0.0000 ±0.0205
0.0000 ± 0.0575
0.0000 ±0.0141
0.0000 ±0.0657
0.0000 ±0.0314
0.0352 ± 0.0244
0.0000 ± 0.0029
0.0000 ±0.0056
0.0000 ±0.0226
0.00 ±0.27
0.00±0.13
0.53 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.13
0.04 ±0.17
0.01 ±0.15
0.00±0.13
0.79±0.18
0.07 ±0.13
0.00±0.15
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±8.23
0.00 ±3.45
0.92 ±1.22
3. 55 ±1.77
0.00 ±3.05
0.00 ±16.66
3.43 ±5. 12
0.00 ± 8.44
3.63 ±7.48
63.11 ±12.40
17.76 ±5.25
0.00 ±7.28
1.31 ±3.13
44.85 ±10. 02
2. 86 ±1.82
14.75 ±3.89
5.08 ±1.70
1.32 ±0.69
5. 83 ±1.74
0.00±1.13
5.21 ±2.26
5.72 ± 1 .34
2. 24 ±2.38
0.00 ±6.66
0.00 ±10. 17
0.03 ±0.30
0.00 ±13.41
0.00 ±5.68
0.00 ±5.07
0.00 ±22.93
0.00 ±24.82
0.00 ±6. 11
0.00 ±28.21
0.01 ±0.13
0.00 ±28.28
0.48 ±0.30
0.00 ±27.53
0.00 ±18. 82
0.00 ±15.91
4. 02 ±9.79
0.00 ±7. 16
S1-2
0.0000 ±0.0306
0.0044 ±0.01 03
0.0000 ±0.01 83
0.0000 ±0.0226
0.0000 ±0.0634
0.0037 ±0.01 61
0.3450±0.1281
0.1 253 ±0.0431
0.461 5 ±0.1 154
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0062
0.0000 ±0.0249
3.11 ±0.42
0.16±0.15
8.42 ±1.32
5.17±0.73
0.76 ±0.15
2.49 ±0.26
2. 14 ±0.24
0.84±0.19
6.00 ±0.81
0.75 ±0.19
0.61 ±0.19
0.36 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.15
0.87 ±0.20
0.36 ±0.14
0.83 ±0.26
0.11 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00±0.15
0.27 ±0.14
0.49±0.15
0.93 ±0.30
0.52±0.16
0.53±0.15
1.16±10.25
1 .04 ± 3.97
2.85 ±1.55
1 .35 ± 1 .42
4.27 ±4. 50
5. 85 ±19.06
0.00 ± 5.44
0.00 ±9.31
0.00 ±7.88
0.00 ±12. 17
2.78 ±2. 85
0.00 ±7. 77
0.00 ±3. 33
0.00 ±10.02
5.24 ± 2.44
421 .78 ±31 .30
203.68 ±18.04
6.25 ±2.00
262.95 ± 28.30
0.00 ±1.28
162.05 ±9.88
3.38 ±0.81
75.22 ±5.47
0.00 ±7. 34
61. 26 ±13.29
11. 64 ±1.91
32.29 ±15. 11
9.35 ±7.23
0.00 ±5. 60
20.43 ±26. 10
10.57 ±28. 19
0.00 ±6. 75
7. 50 ±31. 69
2.27 ±0.61
11.31 ±31.92
3.58 ±1.36
13.28 ±30.76
52.40 ±25.69
27.27 ±19.26
22.33 ±12.91
16.22 ±8.56
S2-1
0.0000 ±0.0294
0.0000 ±0.0091
0.0000 ±0.01 75
0.0000 ±0.021 6
0.0000 ±0.0607
0.0000 ±0.01 50
0.0652 ±0.0752
0.0847 ±0.0380
0.3999 ±0.1 010
0.0000 ±0.0031
0.0000 ±0.0059
0.0000 ±0.0238
21 .48 ± 1 .77
1.20 ±0.29
50. 53 ±7. 18
29.64 ± 3.46
4.71 ±0.39
14.34 ±0.97
10.67 ±0.79
5.00 ±0.67
7.34 ±0.97
5.97 ±0.74
4.44 ±0.62
3.01 ±0.43
1.95 ±0.35
5.79 ±0.87
2.99 ±0.23
6.34 ±0.80
0.75 ±0.15
1.06 ±0.1 5
1.94 ±0.30
1.64±0.19
2.30 ±0.28
3.38 ±0.90
2.28 ±0.35
2.07 ±0.24
0.00 ±8. 63
0.00 ±3. 64
3.46 ± 1 .58
0.00 ±1.15
2.25 ±3. 85
0.00 ±17.58
0.00 ±5. 18
0.00 ±8.92
1.13±7.70
33.78 ±12.20
0.00 ±2. 31
14.64 ±8. 18
0.00 ±3. 16
43.72 ±10.44
0.00 ±1.08
34.87 ±4.83
21 .08 ±2. 67
1.14±0.67
26. 97 ±3.61
0.00 ±1.23
26.92 ±2.91
0.75 ±0.25
21 .97 ±2.93
0.00 ±7. 02
16.14±11.03
0.26 ±0.33
0.00 ±14.14
0.00 ±5.98
0.00 ±5.44
0.00 ±24. 18
0.00 ±26.49
13.95 ±7.88
0.00 ±29.78
33.72 ± 8.50
0.00 ±29.89
6.24 ±2.30
0.08 ±29. 19
1.51 ±20.22
3. 35 ±17. 12
0.00 ±9. 99
16. 19 ±8.22
S2-2
0.0000 ±0.0285
0.0112 ±0.0107
0.0000 ±0.01 72
0.0000 ±0.0211
0.0000 ± 0.0594
0.0078 ±0.01 54
0.3308 ±0.1 21 7
0.2431 ±0.0552
0.5870 ±0.1434
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0058
0.0000 ±0.0233
1.55 ±0.32
0.06±0.13
2. 57 ±0.51
1.37 ±0.35
0.12 ±0.13
0.64 ±0.19
0.55±0.16
0.00±0.13
0.34±0.15
0.25±0.15
0.25±0.16
0.16±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.56 ±0.17
0.22 ±0.13
0.40 ±0.22
0.01 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.05±0.13
0.18±0.13
0.22±0.15
0.19±0.13
0.11 ±0.13
0.00 ±9. 14
0.42 ±3.69
16.76 ±3.93
1 .42 ± 1 .35
2. 90 ±3.93
0.00 ±17.21
0.00 ±5.08
74.61 ±11.98
0.00 ±7.45
0.00 ±11. 44
1.59 ±2.55
51.15±10.15
0.00 ±3. 14
187.94 ±17.44
0.00 ±1.06
21. 76 ±4.21
10.20 ±1.97
0.00 ± 0.43
15.57 ±2. 52
0.00±1.19
9. 29 ±2.38
1.26 ±0.35
3.71 ±2.46
0.00 ±6.87
0.00 ±10.51
0.13 ±0.31
0.00 ±13.87
0.00 ±5.85
0.00 ±5.24
0.00 ±23.67
0.00 ±25.62
0.00 ±6.31
0.00 ±29. 15
0.48 ±0.1 9
0.00 ±29.21
0.08 ±0.22
0.00 ± 28.44
0.00 ±19.43
0.00 ±16.44
0.00 ±9.45
0.00 ±7.39
S2-3
0.0000 ±0.0293
0.0000 ±0.0091
0.0000 ±0.01 77
0.0000 ±0.021 8
0.0000 ±0.061 2
0.0044 ±0.01 56
0.21 76 ±0.0997
0.0306 ±0.0348
0.3262 ± 0.0845
0.0255 ± 0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0060
0.0000 ± 0.0240
6.59 ±0.66
1.56 ±0.35
12.35 ±1.84
10.85 ±1.34
0.22 ±0.13
3. 50 ±0.30
3.01 ±0.28
1.60 ±0.25
2.47 ±0.37
1.10±0.21
0.86 ±0.20
0.55±0.15
1.75 ±0.33
6. 93 ±1.02
2. 70 ±0.22
6. 06 ±0.77
0.24 ±0.1 3
1.15 ±0.16
0.71 ±0.18
1.07±0.16
2. 07 ±0.26
3. 26 ±0.85
2. 30 ±0.35
2. 20 ±0.24
0.00 ±8.72
0.00 ±3.67
3.40 ± 1 .58
0.02 ±1.20
3. 82 ±4.26
0.55 ±18. 15
0.46 ±5.33
17.59 ±9.42
0.00 ±7.56
4.78 ±11. 87
2. 70 ±2.75
16.72 ±8.35
0.00 ±3.22
22.09 ±10. 00
0.00 ±1.09
10.22 ±3.99
9.21 ±1.97
1.61 ±0.78
7. 80 ±1.95
1.13±1.34
5. 56 ±2.40
3.17±0.76
4.01 ±2.55
0.00 ±7.09
0.40 ±10.86
4. 99 ±0.91
0.00 ±14.29
5. 32 ±6.58
8. 36 ±6.22
0.00 ± 24.47
0.00 ±26.46
0.00 ±6.52
0.00 ±30. 10
0.70 ±0.25
0.00 ±30.09
0.01 ±0.21
0.00 ±29.30
0.00 ±20. 01
0.00 ±16. 96
0.00 ±9.73
0.00 ±7.61
S2-1
0.0000 ±0.031 6
0.0000 ±0.0098
0.0000 ±0.01 90
0.0000 ±0.0234
0.0000 ±0.0658
0.01 75 ±0.01 80
0.0000 ±0.0742
0.0000 ±0.0358
0.2532 ±0.0692
0.0000 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0064
0.0000 ±0.0258
4.77 ± 0.54
0.24 ±0.15
10. 87 ±1.64
6.62 ±0.89
1.13±0.17
3.02 ±0.29
2.58 ±0.27
0.29±0.15
2.62 ±0.39
1.07 ±0.22
0.76 ±0.21
0.58±0.17
0.52 ±0.19
1.78 ±0.31
1.01 ±0.16
1.55 ±0.32
0.20 ±0.14
0.00±0.15
0.44 ±0.1 7
0.49±0.16
0.73±0.17
1.03 ±0.31
0.68±0.18
0.66±0.16
22.54 ±15.58
0.00 ±4. 05
17.21 ±4.11
26.43 ±8.22
72.99 ±30.64
0.00 ±19.10
0.00 ±5. 64
53.16±11.57
20.01 ±10.60
0.00 ±12.69
0.57 ±2. 71
118.24±16.39
0.00 ±3.44
115.12±14.17
0.00 ±1.30
41 .47 ± 5.44
18.93 ±2.65
1 .46 ± 0.78
28. 83 ±3.89
0.00 ±1.29
17. 33 ±2.81
0.76 ±0.26
10.64 ±2.84
0.00 ±7. 62
3. 89 ±11. 72
3.55 ±0.72
0.00 ±15.35
0.00 ±6.48
0.00 ±5. 81
0.00 ±26.23
0.00 ±28.41
0.00 ±7. 00
0.00 ±32.28
2.77 ±0.74
0.00 ±32.35
0.51 ±0.33
0.00 ±31. 50
0.00 ±21 .51
0.00 ±18.21
0.00 ±10.45
0.00 ±8. 19
S3-1
0.0000 ±0.0053
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0037
0.0000 ±0.01 14
0.0000 ±0.0034
0.01 92 ±0.021 7
0.0034 ±0.0090
0.001 6 ±0.0054
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.0071
0.12±0.13
0.00 ± 0.07
0.37±0.13
0.22±0.12
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.07
0.02 ±0.07
0.04 ±0.07
0.06 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.07
0.05 ±0.07
0.08 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.07
0.33±0.11
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.07
0.03 ±0.07
0.02 ±0.08
0.02 ±0.07
0.02 ±0.07
2.23 ±3. 54
3.76 ±1.65
5.80 ±1.36
0.34 ± 0.43
0.00 ±1.09
5.02 ±6. 12
0.00 ±1.69
16.71 ±3.50
0.60 ±2.51
6.46 ±3. 88
8.55 ±2. 30
105.08 ±11. 63
5.84 ± 1 .99
95.67 ±8.04
8.65 ±2.41
10.10±1.52
101 .28 ±8.80
11. 48 ±3. 28
81. 10 ±8.67
5.41 ±1.46
73. 88 ±4.29
2.46 ±0.57
36.62 ±2.38
1.68 ±2. 31
32.05 ±4.92
0.90 ±0.21
32.53 ±5.14
11. 58 ±3.72
0.30 ±1.78
28. 84 ±9.59
38.09 ±12.51
9.72 ±3.40
34.07 ±12.39
0.51 ±0.17
27.42 ± 1 1 .76
1.52 ±0.58
46.63 ±11. 93
25.01 ±9.22
29. 12 ±8.31
26.22 ±7.67
28.03 ±4.93
B1-3
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Tritriacontane
Tetratriacontane
Pentatriacontane
Hexatriacontane
Heptatriacontane
Octatriacontane
Nonatriacontane
Polar comoounds (uo/mile)
heptanoic acid (c7)
me-malonic (d-c3)
guaiacol
benzoic acid
octanoic acid (c8)
phenylacetic acid
maleic acid
succinic acid (d-c4)
4-me-guaiacol
o-toluic
me-succinic acid (d-c4)
m-toluic
nonanoic acid (c9)
p-toluic
2,6-dimethylbenzoic acid
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid (d-c5)
2-methylglutaric (d-c5)
2,5-dimethylbenzoic acid
3-methylglutaric acid (d-c5)
2,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
2,3- and 3,5- dimethyibenzoic acid
decanoic acid (c10)
4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyi-syringol
3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
hexanedioic (adipic) acid (d-c6)
salcylic acid
trans-2-decenoic acid
cis-pinonic acid
3-methyiadipic acid (d-c6)
4-formyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid (c11)
isoeugenol
heptanedioic (pimelic) acid (d-c7)
2,3-dimethoxybenzoic acid
acetovanillone
2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid
dodecanoic (lauric) acid (c12)
2,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
phthalic acid
suberic acid (d-c8)
levoglucosan
3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
syringaldehyde
3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
tridecanoic acid (c13)
isophthalic acid
vanillic acid
homovanillic acid
azelaic acid (d-c9)
myristoleic acid
myristicacid (c14)
sebacicacid (d-c10)
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid (c15)
undecanedioic acid (d-d 1 )
palmitoleic acid
palmitic acid (c16)
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid (d-c12)
traumatic acid
heptadecanoic acid (c17)
1 ,1 1-undecanedicartoxylic acid (d-d 3)
oleic acid
elaidic acid
stearic acid (c18)
1,12-dodecanedicartoxylicacid (d-c14)
8,15-pimaradien-18-oic acd
pimaric acid
SO-1
2.55±1.10
2. 93 ±1.06
1.50 ±0.57
2.51 ±0.33
0.98 ±0.39
1.70 ±1.01
2.80 ±0.86
10.32 ±2.78
2.83 ±1.08
0.15±0.08
0.00 ±726.96
12.69 ±6. 28
0.00 ±15. 02
4. 25 ±1.20
23.29 ±7. 19
0.29 ±0.04
1 .49 ± 2.24
4. 10 ±1.07
2. 50 ±1.42
20.32 ±8. 60
3. 37 ±1.86
0.38 ±1.1 2
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
2. 82 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±1.23
9.67 ±2.54
164.99 ±126.45
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±1.79
50.50 ±4.23
0.41 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.29
1.59 ±0.67
0.33 ±1.65
0.17 ±0.28
0.00 ±2.07
0.00±0.15
0.34 ±0.45
0.87 ±0.86
0.38 ±0.23
0.07 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±2.35
0.16 ±0.06
0.50 ±20.79
2. 68 ±0.83
184.38 ±37.02
0.00 ±11. 39
3.81 ±1.59
0.03 ±0.25
0.34 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.32
28.02 ± 47.40
0.00 ±3.23
0.00 ±1.43
0.98 ±2.93
0.00 ±0.13
8. 66 ±5.82
0.21 ±0.62
0.23 ±0.30
0.00 ±1.70
0.09 ±0.11
0.25 ±0.62
2.29 ±10. 60
0.00 ±0.20
0.12 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±1.98
0.00 ±0.04
6.61 ±6.39
0.00 ±0.48
0.00 ±11. 53
2. 78 ±0.87
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.30
SO-2
1 .79 ± 1 .45
2.43 ±1.60
0.86 ±0.64
1 .43 ± 0.55
0.66 ±0.42
0.68 ±0.76
0.00±0.12
0.42 ±3.06
15.03 ±3.19
0.13±0.10
0.00 ±849.55
1.84±7.12
0.00±17.11
9.05 ±1.86
44.88 ±9. 12
0.01 ±0.07
1.65 ±2. 64
11.45±1.58
1.79 ±1.66
13. 17 ±8.54
2.31 ±2.14
0.00 ±1.32
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.06
11. 78 ±0.52
1.53 ±0.44
0.00 ± 1 .45
1 .42 ± 2.28
0.00 ±140.47
0.02 ±0.26
0.00 ±2. 07
45.38 ±4.76
0.51 ±0.18
0.51 ±1.53
1.63 ±0.79
7.66 ±2. 34
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±2.44
0.16±0.19
8.36 ±2. 04
0.88 ±1.00
0.22 ±0.22
2.32 ±0.81
0.00 ±0.06
0.21 ±2.76
0.15±0.08
0.00 ±24.41
0.74 ±0.58
136.83 ±31 .78
0.00 ±13.32
0.63 ±1.40
0.04 ±0.29
0.19±0.08
0.00 ±0.27
0.61 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.39
2.84 ±54.71
2.91 ±3.83
0.00 ±1.70
0.77 ±3.45
18.26 ±2.26
1.70 ±5. 65
0.08 ±0.73
0.00 ±0.36
0.03 ±2.03
0.31 ±0.23
0.65 ±0.83
12.25 ±16.03
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.06
0.26 ±2. 39
0.66±0.19
0.25 ±9.45
0.00 ±0.57
0.00 ±13.80
0.36 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.28
0.03 ±0.35
SO-3
0.40 ±0.53
0.26 ±0.55
0.16 ±0.23
0.16 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.08
0.14 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.05
1.41 ±3.28
6.20 ±1.89
0.23±0.10
0.00 ±907.65
4.44 ±7.59
0.13 ±18.48
96.43 ±12.80
12.02 ±8.26
0.35 ±0.21
1.76 ±2.82
4. 39 ±1.30
1.73 ±1.77
13.08±8.64
2.91 ±2.27
0.71 ±1.41
0.13 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
6. 12 ±0.27
1.17 ±0.33
0.85 ±1.88
0.00 ±2.42
0.00 ±148.55
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±2.21
4.81 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.61
0.84 ±0.74
7. 98 ±2.46
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±2.61
2. 06 ±0.43
8. 94 ±2.09
0.78 ±1.06
0.00 ±0.21
2. 57 ±0.86
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±2.95
1 .24 ± 0.44
0.00 ±26. 13
1.11 ±0.66
75. 34 ±24.11
0.00 ±14. 25
0.00 ±1.14
0.08 ±0.31
0.20 ±0.06
0.48 ±0.36
0.59 ±0.06
0.39 ±0.41
7.30 ±58.68
3.94±4.11
0.80 ±1.90
0.29 ±3.68
0.00 ±0.16
4. 30 ±6.21
0.00 ±0.78
4.42 ±0.63
0.00 ±2. 14
0.10 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±11. 93
0.00 ±0.25
0.21 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±2.48
0.00 ±0.05
13. 19 ±10. 06
0.10 ±0.61
0.00 ±13.90
0.66 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.29
23.24 ±3. 06
50-4
0.00 ±0.57
0.21 ±0.67
0.15±0.27
0.00 ±0.26
0.18±0.17
0.06 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.07
3.35 ±3.29
4.58 ± 1 .54
0.23±0.10
0.00 ±905.79
5.69 ±7. 59
0.02 ±19.58
108.89 ±13. 63
9.73 ±8. 15
0.35 ±0.30
1.95 ±2. 80
2.97 ±1.26
1.82 ±1.76
16. 60 ±9.25
1.84 ±2. 21
1 .35 ± 1 .42
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.04
4.96 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.53
1 .63 ± 2.42
0.00 ±148. 10
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±2. 20
79.53 ±8.45
0.33 ±0.11
0.00 ±1.62
5.70 ±1.37
6.39 ±2. 33
0.13±0.35
0.00 ±2. 59
1.66 ±0.35
2.68 ±0.89
1 .08 ± 1 .07
0.00 ±0.21
2.33 ±0.87
0.00 ±0.04
13.08 ±3.14
0.23 ±0.09
0.00 ±25. 97
6.42 ±1.70
165.61 ±37.39
0.00 ±14. 16
0.10±1.26
0.06 ±0.31
0.11 ±0.05
0.12±0.30
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.40
44.45 ± 59.23
8.35 ±4. 27
0.00 ±1.79
1.53 ±3. 66
0.00 ±0.16
7.73 ±6. 79
1.36 ±0.78
3.02 ±0.51
0.00±2.12
0.38 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.56
0.00 ±11. 61
0.00 ±0.25
0.15±0.25
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±2.47
0.52 ±0.14
9.11 ±9.26
0.41 ±0.61
0.00 ±13. 87
5.44 ± 1 .42
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.37
SO-5
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±0.82
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.35
0.05 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.08
8.47 ± 3.42
1 .57 ± 1 .06
0.20±0.10
249.59 ± 939.80
10.60 ±7. 82
0.44 ±19.01
0.00 ±1.21
0.00 ±8. 10
0.10 ±0.05
5. 89 ±3.03
0.00 ±1.22
6. 37 ±1.84
15.09±9.13
7. 88 ±2.62
0.58 ± 1 .43
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±1.72
0.00 ±2.43
165.23 ±159. 84
0.01 ±0.21
1.32 ±2.32
10.86 ±1.19
0.30 ±0.11
0.00 ±1.62
0.00 ±0.70
16.53 ±3.66
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±2.62
75.12±13.11
19.27 ±4.73
0.42 ± 1 .09
0.07 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.76
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±2.97
0.04 ±0.05
19.80 ±26.45
0.30 ±0.58
869.47 ±171 .87
1.36 ±14. 80
0.00 ±3.37
0.08 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±58. 80
11. 24 ±4. 50
0.00 ± 1 .84
0.00 ±3.69
0.00 ±0.16
627.05 ±160.46
0.00 ±0.78
0.00 ±2.30
0.00 ±2. 15
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.56
11 6.79 ±49.71
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.05
19.65 ±8.57
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±3.90
0.00 ±0.61
448.50 ±164.58
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±1.66
0.16 ±0.38
SO-6
0.00 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.49
0.03 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.21
0.03 ±0.10
0.04 ±0.14
0.01 ±0.05
7.83 ±3.35
0.00 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.08
1445.35 ±950.21
0.00 ±7.41
0.02 ±19.71
0.00 ±1.20
0.00 ±7. 98
0.00 ±0.04
6.38 ±3. 03
0.00 ±1.20
7.49 ±1.83
1.25 ±7. 14
5.85 ±2.42
4.1 7 ±1.48
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.04
3.53 ±2.37
0.00 ±2.40
327.61 ±165.30
0.50 ±0.33
0.00 ±2. 30
9.59 ±1.05
0.19±0.07
0.00 ±1.60
0.00 ±0.69
2.24 ±2. 10
0.27 ±0.35
2.99 ±2. 71
0.51 ±0.21
2. 14 ±0.82
0.00 ±1.03
1.39 ±0.59
1.42 ±0.81
0.00 ±0.04
10.48 ±3.07
0.29 ±0.11
11. 69 ±26.01
0.00 ±0.54
50.27 ±20.98
0.00 ±14.22
1 .62 ± 1 .43
0.02 ±0.31
0.32 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.42
65.29 ±61 .57
0.54 ±4. 05
2.91 ±2.18
8.71 ±3.79
0.00 ±0.16
16.72 ±8.34
1.69 ±0.80
0.12±0.38
0.00 ±2. 14
1.98 ±1.28
0.00 ±0.56
7. 59 ±14. 13
0.00 ±0.25
1 .24 ± 0.35
0.00 ±0.04
0.68 ±2. 61
0.11 ±0.06
0.00 ±3.94
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±14.51
2.00 ±0.67
0.25 ±0.38
0.41 ±0.38
S1-1
0.00 ±2.75
0.00 ±3.07
0.00 ±1.1 2
0.00 ±1.32
0.00 ±0.51
0.00 ±0.73
0.00 ±0.27
11. 24 ±8.64
7. 64 ±2.77
0.26 ±0.24
0.00 ±2371 .39
11. 08 ±16.09
0.00 ±35.61
82.38 ±12.86
14. 10 ±19.67
1.61 ±1.22
37.46 ±8.21
0.00 ±2.89
48.89 ±5. 57
56. 95 ±27.71
43.1 6 ±8.37
0.00 ±2.70
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.13
0.02 ±0.12
6.84 ±6.61
0.00 ±5.73
0.00 ±359.82
0.00 ±0.73
1.36 ±4.46
508.15±56.03
0.00 ±0.11
4. 22 ±8. 12
0.00 ±1.66
9. 16 ±5. 16
0.12 ±0.53
0.00 ±4.50
26.89 ±4.80
38.47 ±9.68
0.00 ±2.31
0.00 ±0.65
1 .75 ± 1 .22
0.00 ±0.11
122. 90 ±10.60
13.02 ±4.65
0.00 ±51 .57
8. 24 ±2.49
287.25 ±74.22
0.00 ±24. 99
0.00 ±4.51
0.00 ±0.77
0.00 ±0.11
2.77 ± 1 .49
0.00 ±0.11
1.71 ±0.73
27. 60 ±88.38
10.08 ±6. 31
0.00 ±2.55
4.44 ±5.65
36.20 ±4.69
64.38 ± 27.79
0.00 ±1.25
7.01 ±1.40
2.57 ±3.72
0.83 ± 0.75
3.21 ±2.54
106.45 ±68.08
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±1.61
0.00 ±0.11
0.55 ±6.40
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±17.43
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±34. 30
0.75 ±0.44
0.04 ±0.35
16.68 ±2.42
S1-2
0.00 ±2. 98
0.00 ±3. 53
2.55 ±1.92
0.00 ± 1 .45
14.29 ±5.26
2.29 ±2.39
0.35 ±0.42
0.00 ±9.28
8.04 ±2. 96
0.00±0.17
0.00 ±2579. 00
133.25 ±23. 92
0.00 ±35.83
0.00 ±1.79
0.00 ±21 .23
0.00 ±0.12
1097.50 ±164.88
0.00±3.16
0.00 ±4. 88
78.50 ±33.66
1476.73 ±202.92
0.00 ±23.22
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.14
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±3.92
5.07 ±6.44
71 0.66 ±445.43
260.80 ± 37.69
0.00 ±12. 12
6.91 ±4.15
17.26 ±5.58
338.28 ± 36.87
0.00 ±1.85
39.13 ±10.26
0.00 ±0.58
0.00 ±4. 95
174.66 ±30. 56
1.30 ±1.04
5.72 ±3. 99
0.00 ±0.35
35.77 ± 6.04
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±4.34
0.00±0.12
0.00 ± 56.75
0.00 ±1.41
322.20 ± 82.74
0.00 ±27.53
0.00 ±5. 24
0.00 ±0.85
0.00 ±0.12
386. 69 ±137.17
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±6.06
252.18±118.93
127.1 3 ±23.28
79.23 ±25.26
2.41 ±6.50
0.00 ±1.26
0.00 ±11. 28
0.36 ±1.25
31 .53 ±3.75
0.00 ±3.86
0.00 ±0.51
0.00 ±1.01
0.00 ±27.62
0.00 ±0.58
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±6. 81
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±13.82
0.00 ±0.77
0.00 ±41 .43
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.17
57.77 ±7.73
S2-1
0.46 ±3. 18
0.00 ±3. 22
1 .56 ± 1 .63
0.00 ± 1 .40
0.00 ±0.56
0.00 ±0.83
0.00 ±0.29
8.66 ±9.06
0.00 ±1.58
0.59 ±0.25
0.00 ±2480.05
0.00 ±16.62
0.00 ±40.68
120.60 ±18. 07
18.38 ±20.84
0.20 ±1.78
58.06 ±10.92
6.88 ±3. 38
52. 93 ±5.89
12.03 ±21 .04
45.54 ±8.82
0.00 ±2. 85
0.00 ±0.42
0.00±0.11
40.53 ± 2.42
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±5.27
56.38 ±10.90
0.00 ± 377.93
0.00 ±1.14
0.00 ±4. 69
67.90 ±7.45
0.00±0.11
4.91 ±3.53
8.65 ±2. 75
20.47 ± 6.40
0.15±0.58
0.00 ±4. 78
150.67 ±26. 30
7.66 ±2. 32
1.14±3.34
0.00 ±0.35
28.1 3 ±4.82
0.00 ±0.11
280. 14 ±22. 25
5.32 ±1.91
5.70 ±54.68
1 .02 ± 1 .42
305.98 ±78.68
0.00 ±26.74
0.00 ±4. 78
0.92 ±0.82
0.00±0.11
10.90 ±4.35
6.87 ±0.50
1.87 ±0.79
90.86 ±97.37
3.03 ±6. 27
59.00 ±18.84
9.87 ±6. 07
22.32 ±3.11
55.27 ±26.21
0.00 ± 1 .24
5.87 ±1.25
0.00 ±3.69
1.21 ±1.00
2.62 ±2. 38
48.77 ±48.51
0.00 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.82
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±6. 56
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±17.44
0.55 ±0.80
0.00 ±41 .23
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.91
S2-2
0.00 ±2.75
0.00 ±3. 16
0.00 ±1.14
0.00 ±1.36
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.73
0.00 ±0.28
0.52 ±8.78
0.00 ±1.54
4. 57 ±0.89
0.00 ± 2441 .89
0.00 ±16. 15
58. 00 ±56.77
0.00 ±1.68
0.00 ±19.90
0.00 ±0.11
300. 20 ±45.67
0.00 ±2.96
553.26 ±33.99
3.21 ±19.48
493.37 ±68.65
29.04 ±8.03
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±3.67
0.00 ±5.92
0.00 ±366.57
50.53 ±8. 38
0.00 ±4.58
6.13±0.99
0.00 ±0.11
87.37 ±10.15
0.00 ±1.72
0.00 ±4.96
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±4.60
50.35 ±8. 84
0.00 ±0.75
0.62 ±2.52
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±1.1 5
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4.03
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±53. 14
0.00 ±1.32
838.82 ±174. 36
0.00 ±25. 78
0.00 ±11. 86
0.00 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.11
55.95 ±20.22
31. 47 ±2.20
1 .21 ± 1 .04
0.00 ±88. 53
84.21 ±16.14
0.00 ±2.60
16.07 ±6.25
35.89 ±4.62
0.00 ±9.83
0.00 ±1.27
33.51 ±3.93
0.00 ±3.58
1 .96 ± 1 .52
0.00 ±0.94
0.00 ±25. 55
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±6.31
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±18.54
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±36. 00
0.18±0.32
0.00±0.19
9.43 ± 1 .57
S2-3
0.00 ±2.82
0.00 ±3.25
0.00 ±1.20
0.00 ± 1 .40
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±9.03
40. 68 ±10.68
0.21 ±0.18
0.00 ±2501 .38
0.00 ±16. 68
0.00 ±34. 54
0.00 ±1.73
12.43 ±20.86
0.19±0.11
22.42 ±6.91
5. 15 ±3.33
55.00 ±6. 01
0.00 ±19. 37
41 .75 ±8.43
0.00 ±2.83
0.00 ± 1 .04
0.00 ±0.11
21. 76 ±1.32
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4.76
90. 84 ±15.56
0.00 ±378.43
0.00 ±1.60
0.00 ±4.73
66.50 ±7. 30
0.12±0.12
7.40 ±3.63
0.00 ±1.77
15.24 ±5.93
0.00 ±0.56
0.00 ±4.75
31 .38 ±5. 57
11. 73 ±3. 26
0.00 ±2.51
10.13±4.12
6. 87 ±1.76
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±4. 16
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±55. 00
0.00 ±1.37
154.36 ±56.50
0.00 ±26. 60
9. 32 ±5.01
0.00 ±0.82
0.00 ±0.18
3. 62 ±1.89
2. 58 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.61
334.43 ±127. 57
16.05±7.11
29.61 ±11.21
0.00 ±5.92
19.71 ±2.79
34.73 ±21 .75
0.00 ± 1 .24
4.74 ± 1 .00
0.00 ±3.67
0.00 ±0.14
0.17±1.62
0.00 ±32. 06
0.00 ±0.56
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±6.42
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±15. 19
0.00 ±0.75
0.00 ± 36.37
0.00 ±0.26
0.00±0.19
4.83±1.15
S2-1
0.00 ±3. 04
0.00 ±3. 51
0.00 ±1.30
0.00 ±1.51
0.00 ±0.63
0.00 ±0.92
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±9.63
0.00 ±1.70
0.00±0.17
0.00 ±2734. 91
0.00 ±17.49
8. 82 ±50.62
0.00 ±1.86
9.74 ± 22.34
0.00 ±0.12
176.61 ±27.87
0.00 ±3. 28
394.1 8 ±25.38
0.00 ±18.59
235.24 ± 34.41
0.00 ±4. 83
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±4.07
0.00 ±6. 56
0.00 ±420.94
36. 56 ±6.65
0.00 ±5. 07
0.00 ±0.62
0.00±0.12
61 .96 ±7.90
0.00 ±1.90
45.21 ±9.79
0.00 ±0.60
0.00±5.16
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.84
4.05 ±2. 89
0.00 ±0.36
0.00 ±1.28
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±4.47
0.00±0.12
5.63±59.18
0.00 ±1.47
533.19 ±120.29
0.00 ±30.48
0.00 ±8. 84
8.77 ±1.18
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.59
401. 60 ±143.80
0.00 ±6. 65
0.00 ±7. 17
0.00 ±6. 35
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±7. 91
0.00 ±1.29
11.96±1.58
0.00 ±3.97
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±1.05
0.00 ±12.03
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±6. 82
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±6.42
0.00 ±0.80
0.00 ±36.23
0.00 ±0.28
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.98
S3-1
17. 34 ±6.59
20. 03 ±6. 19
11. 68 ±3.96
16.64 ±1.80
8.80 ±3. 09
1 1 .92 ± 6.49
46.88 ±14.03
22.85 ±4.78
4.47 ±1.57
0.77 ±0.22
1936.46 ±1274. 21
38.41 ±11.19
0.00 ±25.66
50. 65 ±6.20
78.92 ±13.98
1.11 ±0.26
28.98 ±6.04
11.12±1.95
47. 90 ±3.87
46.84 ±17.06
41 .33 ±6.82
5.69 ±2. 01
0.04 ±0.17
0.10±0.07
7.30 ±0.33
3.38 ±0.95
9.48 ±4.63
6.16±3.43
827.06 ±256.80
3.70 ±1.01
0.02 ±4. 88
51. 13 ±4.70
1.16±0.38
5.71 ±2.25
0.77 ±0.96
13.79 ±3.75
1.10 ±0.48
0.00 ±3.43
18. 00 ±3. 18
12.21 ±3.06
0.32 ±1.39
0.00 ±0.29
5.1 9 ±1.30
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±3. 89
4.71 ±1.68
43.67 ± 34.84
6.62 ±1.84
179.77 ±42. 96
0.00 ±18.80
4.59 ±2. 53
0.04 ±0.41
0.91 ±0.19
4.28 ±1.63
2.26 ±0.17
1.67 ±0.63
92.47 ±80.21
0.00 ±5. 35
0.00 ±2.41
1.92 ±4. 86
0.00 ±0.21
57.72 ±19.55
0.00 ±1.02
9.41 ±1.23
1.50 ±2.87
0.73 ±0.45
0.76±1.13
52.01 ±30.05
0.00 ±0.34
0.09 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±3. 36
0.00 ±0.07
17.07 ±15.71
1 .84 ± 0.82
0.00 ±20.06
0.76 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.38
20.21 ±2.69
B1-4
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description SO-1
sandaracopimaric acid 0.00 ±0.10
nonadecanoic acid (c19) 0.00 ±3.36
isopimaric acid 0.00 ±0.35
palustric acid 0.16±0.32
dihydroisopimaric acid 0.04 ±0.14
8-abietic acid 0.00 ±0.21
dehydroabietic acid 0.00 ± 4.67
8,14-abietenicacid 0.00 ±0.03
abieticacid 0.00 ±0.06
eicosanoic acid (c20) 0.00 ±1.06
levopimaric acid 0.00 ±0.03
heneicosanoic acid (c21) 0.00 ±1.1 9
7-oxodehydroabietic acid 0.37 ± 0.09
docosanoic acid (c22) 0.00 ±3.33
tricosanoic acid (c23) 0.00 ± 0.55
tetracosanoic acid (c24) 0.81 ±0.49
cholesterol 0.00 ±0.62
cholestanol 0.02 ±4. 18
ergosterol 0.00 ± 0.03
stigmasterol 0.00 ± 1 .30
sitosterol 0.00 ± 0.03
Carbonvls (ma/mile)
formaldehyde 0.34 ± 0.01
acetaldehyde 0.03 ±0.1 2
acetone 0.29 ±0.1 7
* acrolein 0.03 ±0.01
propionaldehyde 0.04 ± 0.01
crotonaldehyde 0.00 ± 0.01
methyl ethyl ketone 0.1 1 ± 0.01
Methacrolein 0.00 ±0.01
* n-butyraldehyde 0.05 ± 0.01
benzaldehyde 0.04 ±0.01
glyoxal 0.01 ±0.01
valeraldehyde 0.03 ±0.01
tolualdehyde 0.00 ±0.01
hexanal 0.00 ±0.01
SO-2
0.07±0.12
0.09 ±3. 95
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.38
0.28±0.17
0.76 ±0.41
2.30±6.10
0.00 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.08
0.00 ±1.25
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±1.40
1.19±0.16
0.00 ±3. 94
0.00 ±0.67
3.75±1.18
0.00 ±0.77
0.15 ±4. 92
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±1.53
0.00 ±0.06
0.47 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.52
0.04 ±0.02
0.05 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.09 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.01
0.10±0.02
0.06 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
SO-3
22.24 ± 1 .58
0.00 ±4.23
0.00 ±0.44
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±5.86
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±1.33
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.50
0.00±0.10
0.00 ±4.20
0.00 ±0.70
1.25 ±0.66
0.00 ±0.76
81.10±10.95
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.64
0.00 ±0.04
0.45 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.15
0.02 ±0.21
0.10±0.03
0.04 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.01
0.11 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.02
0.13 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
50-4
0.01 ±0.12
0.00 ±4. 20
0.00 ±0.44
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±5. 82
0.00 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.07
0.00 ±1.32
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.49
0.00 ±0.11
0.04 ±4. 18
0.00 ±0.69
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.75
0.08 ±5. 23
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.62
0.00 ±0.04
1.07 ±0.01
0.14±0.18
0.10±0.26
0.06 ±0.02
0.04 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.10±0.02
0.00 ±0.01
0.06 ±0.02
0.06 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
0.04 ±0.01
0.04 ±0.01
SO-5
0.10±0.13
0.00 ±4.25
0.47 ±0.59
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.27
16.21 ±9.88
0.00 ±0.05
0.00±0.10
0.00 ±1.34
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±1.51
0.20 ±0.11
0.00 ±4.22
0.65 ±0.72
0.07 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.76
0.00 ±5.29
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±1.64
0.00 ±0.05
0.57 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.35
<0.24
0.03 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.04 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.01
<0.24
0.10 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
SO-6
0.33 ±0.13
0.01 ±4.19
1.68 ±0.95
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±5. 87
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±1.32
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ± 1 .48
0.31 ±0.11
0.00 ±4. 16
0.00 ±0.69
0.38 ±0.48
0.00 ±0.75
0.00 ±5. 21
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.62
0.00 ±0.04
1.44 ±0.01
0.41 ±0.15
0.03 ±0.21
0.11 ±0.03
0.05 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.02
0.02 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.02
0.23 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
0.07 ±0.01
0.07 ±0.01
S1-1
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±10.00
0.00 ±0.96
1.35 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±9.83
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.76
0.00 ±0.11
0.32 ±2.73
7.58 ± 1 .04
0.00 ±8.82
0.24 ±0.83
0.00 ±0.89
0.00 ±0.24
12.90 ±8. 22
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.49
0.00 ±0.11
19.03 ±0.06
5. 07 ±0.96
1.41 ±1.37
4.48 ±1.1 2
0.60 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.01
0.91 ±0.11
0.55 ±0.01
0.32 ±0.08
6. 22 ±0.02
0.08 ±0.01
0.15±0.02
0.36 ±0.03
0.36 ±0.02
S1-2
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±11. 05
0.00 ±1.06
0.00 ±0.65
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±10.01
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±1.94
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±2. 90
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±9. 62
0.33 ±0.93
0.00 ±2. 29
6.41 ±2.26
102.59 ±15. 20
10. 77 ±0.79
29. 59 ±3.86
0.00 ±0.20
0.34 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.98
0.00 ±1.41
<0.020
0.01 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.01
0.04±0.11
0.01 ±0.01
<0.020
0.02 ±0.02
0.04 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.02
0.02 ±0.03
0.02 ±0.02
S2-1
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±10.54
0.00 ±1.02
2.01 ±0.65
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.50
0.00 ±9. 62
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±1.85
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±2. 77
2.98 ±0.65
0.00 ±9. 20
0.00 ±0.77
0.00 ±0.94
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±8.43
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 62
0.00±0.11
9.13±0.06
1 .59 ± 1 .02
0.00 ± 1 .46
2.85 ±0.71
0.51 ±0.04
0.25 ±0.01
0.34 ±0.12
0.44 ±0.01
0.65 ±0.16
3.31 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.01
0.11 ±0.03
0.10±0.03
0.10±0.02
S2-2
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±10.32
0.00 ±0.99
0.00 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±9.26
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.81
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.72
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±9.07
0.00 ±0.81
0.00 ±1.68
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±8.25
3.13±0.24
0.00 ±2.56
0.00±0.12
48.74 ±0.06
12.21 ±0.98
1 .52 ± 1 .40
15.26 ±3. 82
2. 07 ±0.04
1.23 ±0.01
1.02 ±0.11
2.46 ±0.01
4. 23 ±1.06
16.54 ±0.02
0.25 ±0.01
0.44 ±0.02
0.76 ±0.03
0.76 ±0.02
S2-3
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±10. 64
0.00 ±1.07
0.68 ±0.64
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±9.64
0.00 ±0.11
0.00±0.15
0.00 ±1.87
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.81
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±9.36
0.00 ±0.78
0.00 ±3.07
0.00 ±0.25
10.50 ±8. 67
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.65
0.00 ±0.11
3.21 ±0.06
1.46 ±0.98
0.00 ±1.40
0.96 ±0.24
0.41 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.01
0.15±0.11
0.22 ±0.01
0.38 ±0.09
2. 09 ±0.02
0.04 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.02
S2-1 S3-1
0.00±0.31 0.00±0.17
55.30 ±12.23 0.00 ±5. 57
0.00±1.10 0.00±0.58
0.00±1.13 1.20 ±0.54
0.00±0.30 0.17±0.23
0.00±0.29 0.12±0.37
0.00±10.16 0.00±8.05
0.00±0.12 0.00±0.06
0.00±0.16 0.00±0.10
0.00 ±2. 01 0.00 ±1.76
0.00±0.12 0.00±0.06
0.00 ±3. 01 1.99 ±2. 09
0.00±0.29 0.98±0.18
0.00 ±9. 98 1.58 ±5. 59
0.00 ±0.84 0.00 ±0.92
0.00 ±1.02 0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.27 1.47 ±1.09
0.00±9.15 23.04±7.55
0.00±0.12 5.46±0.39
0.00±2.84 0.00±2.15
0.00±0.12 0.00±0.07
0.68 ±0.06 3.06 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.97 0.78 ±0.33
0.00 ±1.38 0.46 ±0.47
0.02±0.02 0.78±0.19
0.04±0.04 0.13±0.01
0.01 ±0.01 0.05 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.11 0.20 ±0.04
0.00±0.01 0.10±0.01
0.05±0.02 0.13±0.03
0.03 ±0.02 0.85 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01 0.01 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.02 0.03 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.03 0.02 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.02 0.02 ±0.01
* acrolein converts to an unknown rearrangement product that co-elutes with butyraldehyde. Where indicated, the sum of acrolein and butyraldehyde is given as an estimate of the upper limit of the true value for either compound.
VOC (ma/mi)
1 ,3 butadiene (estimated) 0.063 ± 0.093
C2 compounds 1.634 ±0.402
propene 0.467 ± 0.099
propane 0.130 ±0.007
isoButane 0.173 ±0.011
1 Butene+iButylene 0.254 ± 0.030
n-Butane 0.055 ±0.005
t-2-Butene 0.035 ± 0.006
c-2-Butene 0.015 ±0.001
3-Me-1-Butene 3. 043 ±0.336
isopentane 0.041 ±0.004
1-Pentene 0.077 ±0.010
2-Me-1-Butene 0.525 ±0.053
n-Pentane 0.060 ±0.01 8
t-2-Pentene 0.059 ± 0.003
c-2-Pentene 0.046 ± 0.007
2-Me-2-Butene 0.099 ±0.009
22DiMeButane 0.138 ±0.015
CycloPentene 0.012 ±0.001
CycloPentane 0.043 ± 0.002
23DiMeButane 0.171 ±0.017
MTBE 0.001 ±0.000
2-MePentane 0.508 ±0.049
3-MePentane 0.342 ±0.01 8
2-Me-1-Pentene 0.051 ±0.002
1-Hexene 0.024 ±0.002
n-Hexane 0.297 ±0.025
t-2-Hexene 0.01 6 ±0.001
2-Me-2-Pentene 0.020 ± 0.002
c-3-Me-2-Pentene 0.01 8 ±0.001
c-3-Hexene 0.002 ± 0.000
c-2-Hexene 0.010 ±0.001
t-3-Me-2-Pentene 0.015 ±0.001
MeCyPentane 0.175 ±0.017
2,4-DiMePentane 0.146 ±0.007
223TriMeButane 0.006 ±0.001
Benzene 1.139 ±0.132
CycloHexane 0.062 ± 0.006
4MeHexene 0.017 ±0.003
2MeHexane 0.257 ±0.011
23DiMePentane 0.228 ±0.008
SMeHexane 0.287 ±0.01 2
0.501 ±0.742
11. 732 ±2.889
3.711 ±0.785
0.302 ±0.01 7
0.239 ±0.01 6
2. 145 ±0.253
0.305 ±0.029
0.238 ±0.038
0.096 ±0.006
6.330 ±0.700
0.294 ±0.031
0.287 ±0.036
1.243 ±0.126
0.308 ±0.091
0.204 ±0.01 2
0.126±0.019
0.396 ±0.037
0.587 ±0.065
0.074 ±0.008
0.1 36 ±0.007
0.621 ±0.063
0.007 ±0.001
1.888 ±0.184
1.271 ±0.067
0.110±0.004
0.204 ±0.019
1.218±0.104
0.079 ±0.004
0.097 ±0.009
0.095 ±0.004
0.011 ±0.001
0.051 ±0.004
0.077 ±0.005
0.677 ±0.067
0.673 ±0.035
0.01 7 ±0.002
6.400 ±0.743
0.225 ±0.023
0.065 ±0.011
1.168 ±0.048
1 .064 ±0.037
1 .304 ±0.055
0.016 ±0.023
0.371 ±0.091
0.1 16 ±0.024
0.054 ±0.003
0.037 ±0.002
0.059 ±0.007
0.008 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.000
10.018±1.108
0.051 ±0.005
0.005 ±0.001
0.085 ±0.008
0.034 ±0.010
0.013 ±0.001
0.008 ±0.001
0.013 ±0.001
0.011 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.001
0.025 ±0.001
0.037 ± 0.004
0.000 ±0.000
0.079 ±0.008
0.061 ±0.003
0.023 ±0.001
0.009 ±0.001
0.050 ±0.004
0.005 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.001
0.004 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.000
0.028 ±0.003
0.030 ±0.001
0.006 ±0.001
0.137 ±0.016
0.011 ±0.001
0.000 ±0.000
0.037 ±0.001
0.059 ±0.002
0.053 ±0.002
0.007 ±0.010
0.267 ±0.066
0.051 ±0.011
0.1 17 ±0.007
0.040 ±0.002
0.056 ±0.007
0.008 ±0.001
0.009 ±0.001
0.004 ±0.000
2.347 ±0.259
0.002 ±0.000
0.081 ±0.010
0.01 5 ±0.002
0.063 ±0.01 9
0.023 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.001
0.013±0.001
0.01 6 ±0.002
0.003 ±0.000
0.009 ±0.001
0.020 ±0.002
<0.07± 0.007
<0.07± 0.007
0.045 ±0.002
0.012±0.001
0.008 ±0.001
0.047 ±0.004
0.005 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.000
0.029 ±0.003
0.024 ±0.001
0.004 ±0.000
0.166±0.019
<0.05± 0.000
0.000 ±0.000
0.040 ±0.002
0.047 ±0.002
<0.05± 0.002
0.007 ±0.010
0.340 ± 0.084
0.049 ±0.010
0.145 ±0.008
0.078 ±0.005
0.047 ±0.006
0.016 ±0.001
0.020 ±0.003
0.004 ±0.000
0.688 ±0.076
0.002 ±0.000
0.032 ±0.004
0.152 ±0.016
0.019 ±0.006
0.040 ±0.002
0.018 ±0.002
0.047 ± 0.004
0.035 ±0.004
0.007 ±0.001
0.019 ±0.001
0.050 ±0.005
<0.16±0.016
<0.16±0.016
0.098 ±0.005
0.012±0.001
0.005 ±0.001
0.084 ±0.007
0.018±0.001
0.017±0.001
0.009 ±0.000
0.006 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.000
0.007 ±0.001
0.053 ±0.005
0.041 ±0.002
0.004 ±0.000
0.121 ±0.014
0.020 ±0.002
0.001 ±0.000
0.057 ±0.002
0.067 ±0.002
0.064 ±0.003
0.010±0.015
1.226 ±0.302
0.073 ±0.01 6
0.1 26 ±0.007
0.065 ±0.004
0.055 ±0.006
0.01 7 ±0.002
0.021 ±0.003
0.007 ±0.001
0.595 ±0.066
0.01 7 ±0.002
0.038 ±0.005
0.151 ±0.016
0.052 ±0.01 6
0.041 ±0.002
0.020 ±0.003
0.055 ±0.005
0.041 ±0.005
0.010±0.001
0.018±0.001
0.047 ±0.005
<0.16±0.016
<0.16±0.015
0.1 04 ±0.005
0.011 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.001
0.083 ±0.007
0.009 ±0.001
0.011 ±0.001
0.003 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.064 ±0.006
0.030 ±0.001
0.001 ±0.000
0.208 ±0.024
0.027 ±0.003
0.001 ±0.000
0.061 ±0.002
0.049 ±0.002
0.065 ±0.003
7.313 ±10.823
339.430 ± 54.506
54.117 ±11.440
2.471 ±0.140
2. 809 ±0.181
28.067 ±3.306
4.647 ± 0.447
3. 879 ±0.61 2
1.595 ±0.1 03
104.996 ±11. 608
3. 156 ±0.330
4. 283 ±0.539
17. 158 ±1.739
0.000 ±0.000
4. 194 ±0.238
2.441 ±0.363
6. 178 ±0.577
2. 235 ±0.245
1.329 ±0.146
1.722 ±0.086
9. 674 ±0.978
0.149 ±0.013
32.240 ±3. 137
19.408 ±1.01 6
1.047 ±0.038
1.959 ±0.1 82
14.255±1.216
2.025 ±0.1 03
1.839 ±0.1 68
2.007 ±0.087
0.285 ±0.01 5
1.182 ±0.088
1.844 ±0.1 13
10.192±1.013
14.556 ±0.747
0.356 ±0.032
89. 233 ±10. 360
3. 944 ±0.396
0.444 ±0.072
16. 104 ±0.664
21 .923 ±0.773
17. 165 ±0.730
0.045 ±0.066
1.51 9 ±0.374
0.330 ±0.070
0.1 37 ±0.008
0.166±0.011
0.263 ±0.031
0.058 ±0.006
0.067 ±0.011
0.044 ±0.003
2.684 ±0.297
0.097 ±0.010
0.1 94 ±0.025
0.862 ±0.088
0.040 ±0.01 2
0.203 ±0.011
0.107±0.016
0.005 ±0.001
0.251 ±0.028
0.049 ±0.005
0.1 13 ±0.006
0.376 ±0.038
<1. 27 ±0.000
<1. 27 ±0.000
0.835 ±0.044
0.068 ±0.002
0.041 ±0.004
0.709 ±0.060
0.087 ±0.004
0.089 ±0.008
0.055 ±0.002
0.012±0.001
0.046 ±0.004
0.082 ±0.005
0.535 ±0.053
0.300 ±0.01 5
0.010±0.001
0.988±0.115
0.1 96 ±0.020
0.006 ±0.001
0.622 ±0.026
0.464 ±0.01 6
0.662 ±0.028
2.325 ±3.441
15.445 ±23.745
17.203 ±13.370
0.744 ±0.167
1.254 ±0.177
23. 569 ±4.398
3.652 ±0.457
2.286 ±0.583
1.163±0.115
39. 545 ±6.536
2.097 ±0.449
2.459 ±0.575
1 1 .696 ± 1 .838
0.145 ±0.000
2. 179 ±0.206
1.1 37 ±0.302
1 .226 ± 0.450
3.682 ±0.635
0.795 ±0.146
1.408 ±0.104
5.962 ±0.950
0.381 ±0.032
16. 564 ±2.624
10. 980 ±0.933
0.459 ±0.025
2.026 ±0.414
10. 299 ±1.457
0.769 ±0.071
0.147 ±0.096
0.183±0.061
0.066 ±0.010
0.373 ±0.070
0.354 ±0.064
6.984 ± 1 .065
6.403 ±0.557
0.208 ±0.039
38.465 ±7.031
<14.63± 0.399
0.359 ±0.072
9.050 ±0.61 8
9.521 ±0.561
<1 1.92 ±0.71 8
57. 787 ±85.525
2141.071 ±527.149
427.626 ±90.396
10.61 9 ±0.602
15.095 ±0.972
131 .100 ±15.442
20.557 ±1.975
16.241 ±2.563
8. 848 ±0.572
366. 132 ±40.478
16.871 ±1.761
14.688 ±1.848
90.484 ±9. 172
0.529 ±0.1 57
20.634 ±1.1 71
9.967 ± 1 .484
0.968 ±0.090
30.092 ±3.300
5.861 ±0.645
11. 962 ±0.598
52. 136 ±5.270
<1 99.86 ±20.729
<1 99.86 ±19.445
126. 634 ±6.633
3.159±0.116
9.453 ±0.879
11 3. 525 ±9.683
7.537 ±0.383
0.298 ±0.027
0.542 ± 0.024
0.842 ± 0.045
3. 754 ±0.280
0.332 ±0.020
79.972 ±7.946
42.773 ±2. 194
1.643 ±0.148
51 8.964 ±60.254
49.878 ±5.003
1.381 ±0.225
100.666±4.153
63.841 ±2.250
11 0.406 ±4.695
14.497 ±21.455
336.596 ±82.873
107.275 ±22.677
4.203 ±0.238
3.790 ± 0.244
34.246 ±4.034
5.667 ± 0.545
4. 398 ±0.694
1.850 ±0.1 20
63.335 ±7.002
4. 392 ±0.459
2.293 ±0.289
13. 103 ±1.328
0.000 ±0.000
3. 973 ±0.225
1 .746 ± 0.260
0.171 ±0.016
7.318 ±0.803
1.303 ±0.143
2.060 ±0.1 03
9.465 ±0.957
<29.75±3.086
<29.75±2.895
20.721 ±1.085
0.504 ±0.01 8
3.202 ±0.298
13.042±1.113
1.271 ±0.065
0.070 ±0.006
0.106±0.005
0.129 ±0.007
0.653 ±0.049
0.081 ±0.005
12.744 ±1.266
7. 899 ±0.405
0.233 ±0.021
103.300 ±11. 994
3.660 ±0.367
0.263 ±0.043
14.598 ±0.602
11. 697 ±0.41 2
16.884 ±0.71 8
45.015±66.622 2.136±3.162
21 97.31 5 ±540.997 39. 293 ±9.674
333. 109 ±70.41 6 15. 810 ±3.342
11. 822 ±0.670 0.794 ±0.045
32. 948 ±2. 121 1.1 56 ±0.074
161.281 ±18.997 8.939 ±1.053
30. 175 ±2.900 1.353 ±0.130
23.708±3.741 1.196±0.189
11. 909 ±0.770 0.451 ±0.029
581 .087 ± 64.243 25.448 ±2.81 3
22. 283 ±2.327 0.992 ±0.104
34.715±4.368 1433 ±0.180
196.627 ±19. 931 8.772 ±0.889
0.000 ±0.000 0.626 ±0.185
35. 963 ±2.042 1.329 ±0.076
20.152±3.000 0.716±0.106
34. 563 ±3.226 2.284 ±0.21 3
71. 102 ±7.798 2.865 ±0.314
10.767±1.184 0.349±0.038
21 .893 ±1.095 1.031 ±0.052
91 .537 ±9.253 3.854 ±0.390
<314.10±32.579 0.035±0.003
<314.10±30.560 11.017±1.072
208. 396 ±10. 915 7.363 ±0.386
10.499 ±0.384 0.571 ±0.021
13. 574 ±1.262 0.249 ±0.023
183. 683 ±15. 666 6.703 ±0.572
14. 583 ±0.741 0.449 ±0.023
8.663 ±0.793 0.493 ±0.045
6.962 ±0.303 0.482 ±0.021
1.916±0.103 0.056±0.003
7.980 ±0.596 0.269 ±0.020
10. 298 ±0.631 0.443 ±0.027
125.004 ±12.420 4.054±0.403
69. 676 ±3.574 3.933 ±0.202
3.849 ±0.347 0.1 33 ±0.01 2
539.333 ±62. 61 8 22. 921 ±2.661
35. 992 ±3.611 1.470 ±0.147
1.815 ±0.296 0.101 ±0.016
169.078 ±6.975 5.607 ±0.231
114.575±4.038 6.013±0.212
193.532 ±8.231 6.359 ±0.271
B1-5
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Cyclohexene
SEtPentane
* 1-Heptene
* 224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
2MeHeptane
4MeHeptane
SMeHeptane
Hexanal
225TMHexane
Octene-1
1 1 DMeCyHexane
n-Octane
24DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
33DiMeHeptane
EtBenzene
m/p-xylene
2MeOctane
SMeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
n-Nonane
iPropBenzene
IPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
nPropBenzene
mEtToluene
pEtToluene
135TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
Octanal
beta-pinene
* 124TriMeBenzene
* n-Decane
iButBenzene
sButBenzene
Limonene
Indan
13diethylbenzene
14diethylbenzene
12diethylbenzene
2-propylToluene
3-ipropyltoluene
4-ipropyitoluene
2-ipropyltoluene
Nonanal
n-Undecane
1245tetraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1234tetraMeBenzene
n-Dodecane
SO-1
0.006 ±0.003
0.025 ±0.000
<0. 55 ±0.000
<0. 55 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.007
0.207 ±0.001
0.008 ±0.005
0.074 ±0.009
0.082 ±0.004
0.103 ±0.005
0.141 ±0.097
2. 296 ±0.005
0.053 ±0.008
0.155 ±0.007
0.071 ±0.005
0.161 ±0.003
0.000 ±0.01 2
0.114 ±0.001
0.009 ±0.001
0.022 ±0.006
0.156 ±0.002
0.022 ±0.001
0.061 ±0.003
0.021 ±0.051
0.757 ±0.1 24
1 .995 ± 0.004
0.174 ±0.015
0.143 ±0.003
0.037 ±0.049
1.013 ±0.007
0.144 ±0.004
0.147 ±0.005
0.101 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.007
0.062 ±0.005
0.015 ±0.021
0.312 ±0.031
1.074 ±0.019
0.472 ±0.021
0.492 ± 0.024
0.558 ±0.009
0.021 ±0.001
0.013 ±0.070
<1. 54 ±0.159
<1. 54 ±0.002
0.044 ±0.003
0.058 ±0.01 3
0.124 ±0.007
0.129 ±0.050
0.505 ±0.01 8
0.064 ±0.006
0.051 ±0.005
0.088 ±0.003
0.089 ±0.004
0.018 ±0.005
0.017 ±0.003
0.296 ±0.048
0.164 ±0.019
0.143 ±0.010
0.184 ±0.003
0.178 ±0.032
1.098 ±0.1 31
SO-2
0.048 ±0.01 3
0.1 19 ±0.000
<2.42± 0.000
<2.42± 0.001
0.01 6 ±0.032
0.965 ±0.002
0.01 9 ±0.022
0.308 ±0.048
0.411 ±0.022
0.505 ±0.023
0.629 ±0.575
13.581 ±0.020
0.223 ±0.033
0.671 ±0.031
0.327 ±0.026
0.785 ±0.011
0.020 ±0.006
0.677 ±0.01 3
0.1 04 ±0.002
0.094 ±0.029
0.748 ±0.009
0.101 ±0.005
0.306 ±0.01 3
0.099 ±0.364
5.380 ±0.955
15. 383 ±0.020
0.881 ±0.080
0.760 ±0.01 7
0.210±0.331
6.763 ±0.057
1.261 ±0.019
0.684 ±0.023
0.468 ±0.002
0.01 5 ±0.027
0.249 ±0.01 9
0.056 ±0.108
1.613±0.179
6.104±0.109
2.721 ±0.111
2.587 ±0.103
2.360 ±0.034
0.083 ±0.001
0.01 8 ±0.394
<8.72± 0.897
<8.72± 0.007
0.144 ±0.007
0.1 35 ±0.079
0.760 ±0.031
0.628 ±0.259
2.585 ±0.091
0.142±0.013
0.188±0.019
0.369 ±0.01 2
0.277 ±0.014
0.005 ±0.001
0.057 ±0.011
0.1 60 ±0.026
0.760 ±0.090
0.944 ±0.065
1.333 ±0.025
1.193±0.213
2.909 ±0.349
SO-3
0.014 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.000
<0. 09 ±0.000
<0. 09 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.001
0.032 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.001
0.010 ±0.002
0.017 ±0.001
0.019 ±0.001
0.026 ±0.01 8
0.438 ±0.001
0.011 ±0.001
0.024 ±0.001
0.013 ±0.001
0.022 ±0.001
0.000 ±0.01 3
0.022 ±0.001
0.004 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.001
0.032 ±0.001
0.007 ±0.000
0.012 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.01 3
0.197 ±0.038
0.613 ±0.002
0.079 ±0.004
0.038 ±0.001
0.018 ±0.015
0.301 ±0.003
0.068 ±0.001
0.045 ±0.002
0.033 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.002
0.020 ±0.001
0.004 ±0.014
0.205 ±0.01 2
0.416 ±0.009
0.228 ±0.008
0.197 ±0.007
0.174 ±0.001
0.003 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.029
<0. 64 ±0.066
<0.64 ±0.001
0.014 ±0.001
0.022 ±0.006
0.057 ±0.002
0.043 ± 0.024
0.238 ±0.008
0.023 ±0.002
0.023 ±0.002
0.034 ±0.001
0.029 ±0.001
0.003 ±0.001
0.006 ±0.001
0.184 ±0.030
0.089 ±0.011
0.1 15 ±0.008
0.151 ±0.003
0.150 ±0.027
0.556 ±0.067
50-4
0.000 ±0.001
0.01 2 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.01 9
0.1 59 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.001
0.043 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.001
0.01 3 ±0.003
0.024 ±0.001
0.032 ±0.002
0.047 ±0.01 6
0.372 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.001
0.013±0.001
0.009 ±0.000
0.006 ±0.001
0.040 ±0.01 3
0.038 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.001
0.037 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.011
0.1 60 ±0.033
0.526 ±0.000
0.014 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.002
0.024 ±0.01 2
0.254 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.001
0.018±0.001
0.025 ±0.002
0.01 7 ±0.004
0.035 ±0.004
0.011 ±0.013
0.200 ±0.010
0.324 ±0.006
0.150±0.011
0.256 ±0.008
0.1 79 ±0.004
0.009 ±0.004
0.059 ±0.024
0.525 ±0.010
0.102±0.001
0.011 ±0.002
0.029 ±0.002
0.023 ±0.003
0.050 ±0.010
0.051 ±0.002
0.103±0.010
0.201 ±0.021
0.1 25 ±0.004
0.014 ±0.001
0.024 ±0.007
0.01 3 ±0.003
0.1 58 ±0.026
0.143±0.017
0.042 ±0.003
0.086 ±0.002
0.034 ±0.006
0.059 ±0.007
SO-5
0.001 ±0.002
0.018 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.01 8
0.147 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.001
0.046 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.001
0.01 9 ±0.002
0.017 ±0.001
0.030 ±0.001
0.041 ±0.031
0.740 ±0.001
0.006 ±0.001
0.029 ±0.001
0.011 ±0.001
0.028 ±0.001
0.020 ±0.014
0.01 9 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.001
0.027 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.026
0.377 ±0.070
1.130 ±0.001
0.029 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.011
0.137 ±0.023
0.470 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.001
0.029 ±0.001
0.031 ±0.001
0.008 ±0.002
0.017 ±0.003
0.009 ±0.01 6
0.236 ±0.021
0.715 ±0.013
0.323 ±0.01 8
0.426 ±0.01 2
0.273 ±0.007
0.017 ±0.006
0.088 ±0.060
1.31 7 ±0.006
0.060 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.001
0.023 ±0.003
0.029 ±0.005
0.091 ±0.021
0.213 ±0.007
0.075 ±0.007
0.027 ±0.003
0.028 ±0.001
0.006 ±0.000
0.018 ±0.005
0.015 ±0.003
0.532 ±0.086
0.113 ±0.013
0.009 ±0.001
0.013 ±0.000
0.023 ±0.004
1.922 ±0.230
SO-6
0.004 ±0.002
0.01 8 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.011
0.092 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.002
0.051 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.002
0.026 ±0.001
0.012±0.001
0.025 ±0.001
0.023 ±0.01 9
0.439 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.001
0.025 ±0.001
0.011 ±0.001
0.026 ±0.001
0.070 ±0.01 3
0.009 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.001
0.024 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.008
0.1 15 ±0.022
0.351 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.002
0.025 ±0.007
0.1 39 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.001
0.01 8 ±0.000
0.005 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.002
0.006 ±0.005
0.068 ±0.005
0.1 72 ±0.003
0.079 ±0.005
0.1 05 ±0.003
0.066 ±0.003
0.007 ±0.008
0.122±0.016
0.345 ±0.002
0.023 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.000
0.006 ±0.001
0.010±0.001
0.038 ±0.010
0.062 ±0.002
0.01 8 ±0.002
0.023 ±0.002
0.042 ±0.001
0.001 ±0.000
0.01 5 ±0.005
0.007 ±0.001
0.145 ±0.024
0.037 ±0.004
0.006 ±0.000
0.009 ±0.000
0.034 ±0.006
0.026 ±0.003
S1-1
0.686 ±0.151
1.349 ±0.102
2. 063 ±5.758
47. 160 ±0.021
0.572 ±0.369
11. 026 ±0.087
0.897 ±0.341
4. 929 ±0.695
5. 955 ±0.353
8. 304 ±0.436
11.761 ±7.075
261.901 ±0.364
4. 079 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.458
4.814 ±0.415
12.495 ±0.21 5
0.360 ±0.01 6
5. 309 ±0.01 9
0.154 ±0.005
0.206 ±0.350
9. 138 ±0.105
1.183 ±0.059
3.493 ±0.1 52
1.148 ±2.686
39.651 ±5.222
84.096 ±0.1 58
6. 970 ±0.575
5.447 ±0.1 32
1.684 ±1.538
31 .464 ±0.1 86
4. 087 ±0.098
3.590 ±0.1 19
2.426 ±0.01 8
0.153 ±0.138
1.271 ±0.110
0.330 ±0.476
7.101 ±0.643
21 .894 ± 0.400
9. 975 ±0.354
8. 264 ±0.337
7. 764 ±0.213
0.524 ±0.011
0.161 ±1.082
<23.94 ± 2.463
<23.94 ± 0.046
0.937 ±0.040
0.714 ±0.316
3. 047 ±0.077
1.988 ±0.696
6. 957 ±0.245
0.613 ±0.056
0.337 ±0.035
1.1 14 ±0.037
1 .086 ± 0.054
0.254 ±0.077
0.225 ±0.045
3. 780 ±0.61 5
1 .738 ± 0.204
1 .428 ± 0.099
1.673 ±0.031
2.420 ± 0.432
8. 064 ±0.967
S1-2
0.043 ±0.01 9
0.1 72 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.1 28
1.051 ±0.000
0.010±0.017
0.524 ±0.002
0.019±0.013
0.191 ±0.017
0.150±0.011
0.270 ±0.011
0.288 ±0.1 32
3. 106 ±0.003
0.037 ±0.014
0.281 ±0.011
0.117 ±0.010
0.302 ±0.005
0.020 ±0.01 7
0.1 30 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.010
0.252 ±0.003
0.034 ±0.000
0.023 ±0.002
0.014 ±0.053
0.782 ±0.1 36
2.183±0.001
0.024 ±0.001
0.008 ±0.006
0.073 ±0.042
0.849 ±0.002
0.035 ±0.004
0.1 37 ±0.004
0.077 ±0.004
0.029 ±0.005
0.046 ± 0.004
0.012±0.016
0.242 ±0.01 7
0.573 ±0.011
0.263 ±0.014
0.316±0.010
0.228 ±0.006
0.016±0.001
0.01 7 ±0.039
0.864 ±0.007
0.071 ±0.000
0.007 ±0.001
0.01 9 ±0.002
0.020 ±0.003
0.105±0.010
0.015±0.001
0.030 ±0.003
0.01 5 ±0.002
0.01 2 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.000
0.01 2 ±0.004
0.027 ±0.005
0.072 ±0.01 2
0.040 ±0.005
0.010±0.001
0.01 2 ±0.000
0.007 ±0.001
0.01 6 ±0.002
S2-1
0.000 ±0.1 38
2.479 ±0.000
0.992 ±0.000
20.096 ±0.01 3
0.261 ±0.405
7.41 7 ±0.047
0.069 ±0.363
2.940 ± 0.574
2.905 ±0.272
4.862 ±0.328
5.257 ±4. 308
69.370 ±0.31 7
2.729 ±0.304
4. 108 ±0.347
1 .549 ± 0.255
4.592 ±0.1 28
0.100±0.018
3.009 ±0.1 16
0.257 ±0.026
0.043 ±0.241
3.685 ±0.068
0.670 ±0.040
1.444 ±0.142
0.059 ±0.000
17.898±4.143
48.899 ± 0.969
0.1 60 ±0.447
2. 143 ±0.032
1 .803 ± 1 .358
19.293 ±0.071
0.191 ±0.092
2.117±0.014
1.513±0.118
0.602 ±0.072
0.122±2.010
1.117±0.711
3.832 ±0.007
15. 283 ±0.31 9
6.429 ±0.01 6
6.610 ±0.009
5.71 8 ±0.380
0.508 ±0.011
0.593 ±0.910
20. 123 ±0.142
1.468 ±0.1 25
0.529 ±0.288
0.402 ±0.033
<4.94 ±0.000
<2.45± 0.194
1 .937 ±0.034
1.01 9 ±0.000
0.577 ±0.011
1.1 18 ±0.030
0.734 ±0.072
0.088 ±0.623
<2.45± 0.068
3.546 ±0.036
0.463 ±0.339
0.794 ±0.000
0.992 ±0.000
0.257 ±0.000
0.147 ±0.000
S2-2
3. 608 ±2.784
24.854 ± 0.598
12. 078 ±13. 097
107.273 ±0.065
1 .793 ± 2.477
74.006 ±0.01 5
0.155 ±1.975
28.566 ±2.402
20.575 ±1.328
31 .226 ±1.1 75
31 .71 9 ±41 .290
<975.01 ±94.350
<975.01 ± 2.223
44.739 ± 1 .630
17.121 ±1.650
49.670 ±0.253
0.760 ±0.01 7
17.882 ±0.1 93
1.591 ±0.126
5. 290 ±1.270
33. 162 ±0.455
5. 139 ±0.178
10.661 ±0.212
1.601 ±13.773
203.296 ±33.224
535.036 ±0.987
43.594 ±2.352
22.290 ±0.309
3.940 ± 9.764
199.740 ±0.037
0.820 ±0.392
14.445 ±0.446
9. 095 ±0.1 56
1.294 ±0.361
3. 326 ±0.1 95
0.588 ±2.237
33.404 ± 3.684
125.51 8 ±2.295
57.249 ±2.070
48.325 ±1.967
45.275 ±0.1 65
0.405 ±0.000
0.000 ±7.334
162.181 ±0.805
8. 336 ±0.131
2. 668 ±0.181
3. 262 ±3.889
37.51 6 ±0.000
17.031 ±1.039
10.390 ±0.366
5.991 ±0.545
5. 194 ±0.538
8. 778 ±0.289
4.422 ±0.21 8
1 .560 ± 0.475
1.530 ±0.305
26.850 ±4.368
4.397 ±0.51 7
8.981 ±0.619
11. 485 ±0.211
1 1 .429 ± 2.039
37.208 ±4.460
S2-3
0.778 ±0.467
4. 170 ±0.100
2. 008 ±2.225
18.229 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.459
13.701 ±0.004
0.043 ±0.452
6. 533 ±0.421
3. 603 ±0.208
4. 888 ±0.1 73
4. 672 ±5.650
<1 33.42 ±12.911
<1 33.42 ±0.384
7. 720 ±0.245
2. 574 ±0.241
7. 245 ±0.058
0.000 ±0.01 7
3. 709 ±0.082
0.672 ±0.029
1.222 ±0.277
7.227 ±0.078
0.876 ±0.032
1.900 ±0.030
0.230 ± 1 .747
25.783 ±4.962
79.916±0.173
7.643 ± 0.439
4. 159 ±0.077
0.985 ± 1 .465
29.979 ±0.01 2
0.271 ±0.128
4.721 ±0.060
1.223 ±0.041
0.341 ±0.110
1.015 ±0.093
0.280 ±0.361
5. 396 ±0.61 5
20.959 ±0.388
9. 682 ±0.399
9.321 ±0.324
7.449 ± 0.277
0.680 ±0.01 7
0.256 ±1.235
27.315±0.315
3. 260 ±0.022
0.453 ± 0.034
0.602 ±0.651
6. 278 ±0.000
3. 267 ±0.149
1 .489 ± 0.053
1.355 ±0.1 23
0.647 ±0.067
1.236 ±0.041
0.591 ±0.029
0.390 ±0.1 19
0.354 ±0.071
3. 837 ±0.624
1.066 ±0.1 25
1.314 ±0.091
1.806 ±0.033
1.814 ±0.324
5. 725 ±0.686
S2-1
4.403 ±4. 724
42. 169 ±0.926
18.704 ±21 .043
172.357 ±0.1 02
2.802 ±4.827
144.189±0.044
0.453 ±3.209
46.408 ± 4.343
37. 207 ±2.322
54.608 ± 2.085
56.275 ±48.614
<1147.97±111.087
<1 147. 97 ±4. 117
82. 846 ±3.050
32.037 ± 3.090
93.031 ± 0.431
0.050 ±0.01 7
37. 107 ±0.278
2.289 ±0.252
10. 568 ±2.925
76.384 ± 0.743
8.396 ±0.342
20.431 ± 0.289
2. 182 ±20.516
302.827 ±49. 354
794.786 ± 1 .220
53. 885 ±5.101
48. 352 ±0.842
10.748 ±15.671
320.588 ±0.073
1 .599 ± 1 .064
39. 156 ±1.035
21. 124 ±0.449
3.734 ±0.865
7.975 ±0.730
2. 198 ±4. 844
72.336 ± 6.794
231 .434 ±4.339
108.232 ±3.969
92.631 ±3.781
87. 01 9 ±0.298
0.731 ±0.037
0.564 ±14.414
31 8.745 ±2.204
22.830 ± 0.287
5.852 ±0.385
6.930 ±7. 848
75. 700 ±0.000
33.795 ± 1 .694
16. 943 ±0.598
10.494 ±0.955
7.795 ±0.808
17. 779 ±0.585
8.651 ±0.427
2.725 ±0.829
1.737 ±0.346
53.531 ±8.709
10.493 ±1.234
21 .270 ±1.467
28. 959 ±0.533
24. 847 ±4.432
48. 522 ±5.81 7
S3-1
0.1 82 ±0.058
0.520 ±0.000
<13.61 ±0.000
<13.61 ±0.002
0.066 ±0.149
4.439 ±0.01 2
0.1 24 ±0.1 26
1.822 ±0.228
1.956 ±0.108
2.543 ±0.132
3.567 ± 1 .427
33. 703 ±0.126
1.414±0.112
2.247 ±0.1 03
1.078 ±0.095
2.876 ±0.043
0.020 ±0.006
2.41 9 ±0.01 2
0.099 ±0.010
0.439 ±0.083
2. 175 ±0.028
0.316±0.017
1.025 ±0.070
0.527 ±0.497
7.344 ±1.162
18.71 7 ±0.042
1.841 ±0.152
1 .437 ±0.034
0.429 ±0.382
7.820 ±0.038
0.836 ±0.033
1.1 95 ±0.028
0.575 ±0.004
0.033 ±0.050
0.457 ±0.031
0.093 ±0.107
1.599 ±0.155
5.272 ±0.106
2.652 ±0.088
2.058 ±0.089
2.058 ±0.047
0.1 16 ±0.003
0.040 ±0.272
<6.00±0.618
<6.00± 0.006
0.1 24 ±0.009
0.1 59 ±0.075
0.725 ±0.021
0.420 ±0.147
1.471 ±0.052
0.165±0.015
0.286 ±0.029
0.246 ±0.008
0.278 ±0.014
0.057 ±0.01 7
0.081 ±0.016
0.770 ±0.125
0.491 ±0.058
0.31 7 ±0.022
0.354 ±0.006
0.405 ±0.072
1.926 ±0.231
B1-6
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Gravimetric mass (mg/mi)
Carbon fractions by TOR (ma/mi)
Organic Carbon Fraction 1
Organic Carton Fraction 2
Organic Carton Fraction 3
Organic Carton Fraction 4
Pyrolyzed Organic Carton
Total Organic Carbon
Elemental Carton Fraction 1
Elemental Carton Fraction 2
Elemental Carbon Fraction 3
Total Elemental Carton
Total Carbon
Elements by XRF tmg/mi)
Sodium (gualitative only)
Magnesium (qualitative only)
Aluminum
Silicon
Phosphorous
Sulfur
Chlorine
Potassium
Calcium
Titanium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Iron
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Arsenic
Selenium
Bromine
Rubidium
Strontium
Yttrium
Zirconium
Molybdenum
Palladium
Silver
Cadmium
Indium
Tin
Antimony
Barium
Lanthanum
Gold
Mercury
Thallium
Lead
Uranium
Anions by 1C (mo/mi)
Nitrate Ion
Sulfate Ion
Polvcvclic aromatic hydrocarbons (uo/mile)
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1-methylnaphthalene
Biphenyl
1+2ethylnaphthalene
2,6+2,7-dimethylnaphthalene
1,3+1, 6+1 ,7dimethylnaphth
1 ,4+1 ,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
1 ,2-dimethylnaphthalene
2-Methylbiphenyl
3-Methylbiphenyl
4-Methylbiphenyl
Dibenzofuran
A-trimethylnaphthalene
1-ethyl-2-methylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphthalene
C-trimethylnaphthalene
2-ethyl-1-methylnaphthalene
E-trimethylnaphthalene
F-trimethylnaphthalene
2,3,5+l-trimethylnaphthalene
S3-2
22.36 ±3. 54
1.821 ±0.388
2. 756 ±0.514
1.957 ±0.414
1 .658 ± 0.445
0.004 ±0.022
8.186±1.453
2. 228 ±0.620
3. 337 ±0.584
0.082 ±0.029
5.641 ±1.085
13.827 ±2.390
0.2292 ±0.1567
0.0368 ± 0.0223
0.0663 ±0.01 39
2. 2776 ±0.3602
0.0356 ± 0.0064
0.4772 ± 0.0755
0.0174 ±0.0053
0.021 2 ±0.0037
0.3150 ±0.0499
0.01 00 ±0.01 04
0.0036 ± 0.0049
0.0092 ±0.001 7
0.0047 ± 0.0009
0.5034 ± 0.0796
0.0026 ± 0.0049
0.0047 ± 0.0008
0.0197 ±0.0031
0.1403 ±0.0223
0.001 3 ±0.0011
0.0004 ± 0.0020
0.0003 ± 0.0004
0.0031 ±0.0006
0.0003 ±0.0005
0.0006 ±0.0005
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.0011 ±0.0008
0.0027 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.001 5
0.0010 ±0.0020
0.0011 ±0.0019
0.0004 ± 0.0023
0.0040 ± 0.0035
0.0014 ±0.0039
0.0061 ±0.0185
0.01 84 ±0.0243
0.0024 ± 0.0024
0.0002 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0202 ± 0.0034
0.0006 ±0.001 2
0.03 ±0.01
0.92 ±0.06
1172.12±102.06
2707.31 ±215.27
1327.77 ±92. 35
98.36 ±6. 55
153.44 ±17.31
21 3.27 ±17.54
299.66 ±24.89
4.63 ±1.08
49.81 ±5.66
0.00 ±133.34
40. 79 ±38.28
15. 70 ±11. 78
18.02 ±1.35
28.1 5 ±1.60
8. 72 ±0.58
16.03 ±1.60
12.58±1.15
0.67 ±0.22
5. 56 ±0.59
5. 92 ±0.54
7. 02 ±1.1 8
S4-1
3.31 ±0.54
0.21 7 ±0.080
0.437 ±0.089
0.519±0.181
0.275 ±0.072
0.021 ±0.043
1 .438 ±0.289
0.291 ±0.075
0.302 ±0.097
0.011 ±0.007
0.582 ±0.096
2.021 ±0.381
0.1341 ±0.1326
0.0354 ± 0.0204
0.0348 ±0.01 12
0.1437 ±0.0231
0.0039 ±0.0027
0.0626 ±0.01 01
0.0031 ±0.0031
0.01 05 ±0.0022
0.0825 ±0.01 32
0.01 03 ±0.01 07
0.0080 ±0.0046
0.0046 ±0.0011
0.001 3 ±0.0005
0.0614 ±0.0098
0.0004 ±0.0007
0.0063 ±0.0010
0.0075 ±0.001 2
0.01 60 ±0.0036
0.0005 ±0.001 2
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0011 ±0.0004
0.0004 ±0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0069 ±0.001 3
0.0001 ±0.0012
0.0001 ±0.0015
0.0007 ±0.0020
0.0007 ±0.001 9
0.0004 ± 0.0024
0.0008 ±0.0036
0.0021 ±0.0039
0.0025 ±0.01 87
0.0087 ±0.0246
0.0010 ±0.001 3
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0004 ±0.0008
0.0014 ±0.0014
0.0002 ±0.001 2
0.02 ±0.01
0.18 ±0.02
1194.42 ±103. 73
3708.86 ± 294.71
1876. 14 ±130.38
53.44 ± 3.84
254.67 ±24.51
329.90 ±26.99
564.1 2 ±46.50
6.68 ±1.29
46. 93 ±5.35
2.25 ±133.85
49.1 9 ±38.46
16.63 ±11. 81
12. 73 ±0.97
32.61 ±1.84
20.43 ±1.10
22. 25 ±2. 18
15.68 ±1.40
0.59 ±0.21
8.22 ±0.79
4.64 ± 0.45
9.36 ±1.51
S4-2
2.12±0.35
0.236 ±0.053
0.348 ±0.071
0.459 ±0.1 27
0.777 ±0.1 96
0.001 ±0.016
1.801 ±0.333
0.305 ±0.072
0.602 ±0.1 03
0.275 ±0.121
1.178 ±0.218
2. 975 ±0.51 6
0.1 160 ±0.0855
0.0106 ±0.0160
0.0078 ± 0.0071
0.1010 ±0.0163
0.0042 ± 0.0020
0.0424 ± 0.0068
0.0005 ±0.0033
0.0020 ±0.0021
0.0674 ±0.01 08
0.0055 ±0.01 16
0.0021 ±0.0054
0.0010 ±0.0011
0.0017 ±0.0006
0.0575 ±0.0091
0.0003 ±0.0005
0.0007 ±0.0003
0.0045 ± 0.0008
0.0249 ± 0.0044
0.0010 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0007
0.0005 ±0.0003
0.0008 ±0.0003
0.0006 ± 0.0004
0.0008 ± 0.0004
0.0010 ±0.0005
0.0014 ±0.0006
0.0010 ±0.0008
0.0002 ±0.0012
0.0006 ±0.0014
0.0003 ±0.0014
0.0005 ±0.001 6
0.0005 ±0.0025
0.0005 ±0.0028
0.0021 ±0.0130
0.01 99 ±0.01 76
0.001 8 ±0.0011
0.0008 ± 0.0006
0.0009 ±0.0006
0.0050 ±0.0011
0.0011 ±0.0009
0.02 ±0.01
0.14 ±0.01
151 7.09 ±122.35
6857.91 ±544.16
3476.60 ± 241 .23
53.71 ±3.60
520.08 ±44.08
744.66 ± 60.45
1205. 16 ±98. 69
276.46 ±32.53
152.19 ±16.67
106.1 5 ±80.47
11 5.1 7 ±24.26
42.89 ±7. 24
10.32 ±0.77
56.67 ±3. 08
13.86 ±0.73
33.93 ±3. 20
27.61 ±2.32
2.51 ±0.35
13.75±1.16
12.69 ±1.03
14.06±2.13
S5-1
18. 14 ±2.88
1.809 ±0.672
3.469 ±0.698
2.502 ±0.71 9
1.153 ±0.341
0.095 ±0.130
9.029 ±1.61 6
2.641 ±0.743
7.343 ±3. 049
0.041 ±0.014
9.929 ±1.571
18. 959 ±3.343
0.3977 ±0.1 872
0.0455 ±0.0322
0.0002 ±0.01 93
0.1 254 ±0.021 2
0.01 53 ±0.0051
0.1 930 ±0.0309
0.0071 ±0.0055
0.001 9 ±0.0031
0.0335 ±0.0064
0.0026 ±0.01 92
0.0008 ±0.0089
0.0002 ±0.001 9
0.0014 ±0.0009
0.0256 ±0.0045
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0004 ±0.0006
0.0033 ±0.0008
0.0274 ±0.0063
0.0004 ±0.0021
0.0008 ±0.0080
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0072 ±0.001 3
0.0004 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.001 3
0.0005 ±0.0014
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0001 ±0.0027
0.0007 ±0.0035
0.0014 ±0.0034
0.0006 ±0.0042
0.001 7 ±0.0064
0.0061 ±0.0071
0.0224 ±0.0309
0.0229 ±0.0438
0.0004 ± 0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0005 ±0.001 8
0.0501 ±0.0082
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.02 ± 0.03
0.56 ± 0.06
2687.1 2 ±244.64
1634.67±131.34
772.73 ±54. 39
37. 78 ±5.05
106.34 ±32.65
174.99 ±14.58
270.78 ±22.75
64.40 ±7.80
35.91 ±4.07
0.00 ±384. 12
0.00 ±109.56
0.00 ±33.85
13. 64 ±1.08
48. 80 ±2.87
12.32±1.19
33. 28 ±3.39
24.30 ±2.31
0.1 9 ±0.48
13.77 ±1.48
13.88 ±1.25
12.66 ±2.29
S5-2
60.91 ±9.63
21 .743 ±5.729
18. 232 ±3.741
5. 157 ±1.061
1.385 ±0.41 5
0.003 ±0.034
46.521 ± 8.669
2.734 ±0.967
6.628 ±1.335
0.055 ±0.033
9.412±2.161
55.933 ±10.308
0.3757 ±0.21 97
0.0402 ±0.0352
0.0072 ±0.01 93
0.2638 ±0.0425
0.0349 ± 0.0074
0.7571 ±0.1198
0.0030 ±0.01 20
0.0058 ±0.0029
0.1 298 ±0.0208
0.0063 ±0.01 87
0.001 9 ±0.0080
0.0009 ±0.001 6
0.0021 ±0.0009
0.0396 ±0.0066
0.0005 ±0.0010
0.0003 ±0.0006
0.001 3 ±0.0006
0.0383 ±0.0076
0.001 2 ±0.001 9
0.0005 ±0.001 9
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0060 ±0.001 2
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0002 ±0.0014
0.0003 ±0.0020
0.0003 ±0.0027
0.0005 ±0.0035
0.001 3 ±0.0034
0.0009 ±0.0040
0.0025 ±0.0063
0.0000 ±0.0069
0.0202 ±0.0302
0.01 83 ±0.0424
0.0009 ±0.0024
0.0002 ±0.0014
0.0001 ±0.0013
0.0064 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.02 ± 0.03
1.84±0.12
8640.93 ± 692.01
20962.81 ± 1663.84
11874. 69 ±824.11
702.55 ±44.98
1825.00 ±156.98
4025.59 ± 326.24
6255.85 ± 51 1 .64
1309.61 ±153.18
3573.22 ±388. 18
0.00 ±389. 16
378.81 ±115.35
157.66 ±35. 08
144. 12 ±10.45
881 .55 ±47.45
272.82 ±13. 24
557.20 ±51 .79
556.55 ±45. 98
19.88 ±2.52
235.11 ±19.02
235.41 ±18.46
239.01 ±35.24
S5-3
9.46 ±1.51
1 .684 ± 0.448
2.691 ±0.568
2.231 ±0.517
0.569 ±0.1 79
0.003 ±0.037
7. 177 ±1.388
0.431 ±0.147
2.1 12 ±0.452
0.010±0.013
2.549 ±0.626
9.731 ±1.851
0.2698 ±0.1 947
0.0043 ±0.0370
0.0301 ±0.0159
0.0786 ±0.0144
0.0233 ±0.0061
0.0568 ±0.0096
0.0021 ±0.0061
0.0049 ±0.0029
0.1155±0.0186
0.0095 ±0.01 79
0.0036 ±0.0077
0.0023 ±0.0014
0.0011 ±0.0010
0.0778 ±0.01 25
0.0005 ±0.001 2
0.0006 ±0.0006
0.0042 ±0.0009
0.0408 ±0.0079
0.0003 ±0.001 8
0.0003 ±0.001 6
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.0003 ±0.0006
0.0004 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0003 ±0.001 3
0.0007 ±0.001 9
0.0002 ±0.0025
0.0004 ± 0.0034
0.0027 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0039
0.0009 ±0.0060
0.0002 ±0.0066
0.0011 ±0.0315
0.0091 ±0.0411
0.0022 ±0.0023
0.0002 ±0.001 3
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0029 ±0.0020
0.0001 ±0.0019
0.03 ± 0.03
0.15 ±0.05
1556.41 ±173.10
3720.1 2 ±296.66
1743.02 ±121 .64
11 0.32 ±8.61
227.54 ±38. 89
394.94 ±32.34
639.93 ±52.89
161.38±19.08
171 .39 ±18.72
0.00 ±405. 12
0.00 ±115.69
6. 96 ±35.73
32. 56 ±2.42
91 .32 ±5.09
27.31 ±1.74
65.64 ± 6.34
55.72 ±4.81
3.10±0.69
29. 14 ±2.61
31 .30 ±2.57
29.1 2 ±4.62
S5-1
207.43 ±32. 80
37. 197 ±10.985
50. 194 ±11. 291
7.264 ± 1 .457
3.461 ±1.016
3.534 ± 1 .268
101 .649 ±19.936
10.210 ±3.761
70.871 ±14.926
0.020 ±0.01 6
77.566 ±19.006
179.221 ±34.287
0.21 27 ±0.51 78
0.1 268 ±0.0686
0.0685 ±0.0320
0.4661 ±0.0753
0.1 735 ±0.0292
0.9955 ±0.1 577
0.0254 ±0.01 64
0.01 87 ±0.0065
0.531 9 ±0.0844
0.0147 ±0.0352
0.0052 ±0.01 51
0.0083 ±0.0026
0.0037 ±0.0020
0.4600 ±0.0729
0.0007 ±0.0047
0.0029 ±0.0010
0.0277 ±0.0045
0.31 34 ±0.0503
0.001 3 ±0.0037
0.001 2 ±0.0056
0.0002 ±0.001 5
0.0060 ±0.0014
0.0002 ±0.001 7
0.0001 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0024
0.0011 ±0.0027
0.001 6 ±0.0039
0.0000 ±0.0050
0.0001 ±0.0065
0.0000 ±0.0065
0.0044 ± 0.0078
0.0079 ±0.01 20
0.0025 ±0.01 33
0.0064 ±0.0625
0.0088 ±0.081 5
0.0000 ±0.0076
0.0002 ±0.0027
0.0010 ±0.0026
0.0406 ±0.0073
0.0002 ±0.0040
0.03 ± 0.04
1.55 ±0.11
7193.84 ±586. 10
33390.50 ± 2649.57
21 651 .69 ±1502. 17
1928.04 ±122.37
3281 .37 ±277.07
9239.97 ±748.51
14506.88±1185.83
3722.39 ±435.09
12960.25 ±1407.77
0.00 ±446.53
11 76.22 ±152.40
552.46 ±45.41
299.01 ±21.61
31 74.95 ±170.62
668.91 ± 32.29
21 82.80 ±202.36
1738.35 ±143.34
115.92±13.95
1002.41 ±80.72
925.46 ±72. 36
1060.52 ±155.56
S5-5
99. 63 ±15.76
3. 375 ±0.927
7. 628 ±1.663
5.521 ±1.151
3.446 ± 1 .042
13.964 ±5.01 2
33.934 ±6.652
9. 260 ±3.243
55. 568 ±11. 296
0.006 ±0.01 2
50.871 ±11.478
84.805 ±15. 708
0.0000 ±0.2171
0.0058 ± 0.0468
0.0060 ± 0.0201
0.8366 ±0.1326
0.031 7 ±0.0069
0.2865 ± 0.0455
0.0290 ± 0.0086
0.0057 ± 0.0054
0.2858 ± 0.0455
0.0086 ± 0.0324
0.0034 ±0.01 56
0.0062 ±0.0031
0.0033 ±0.0014
0.3544 ± 0.0561
0.0023 ± 0.0040
0.0050 ±0.0010
0.0184 ±0.0030
0.1194±0.0194
0.0001 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0005 ±0.0008
0.0063 ±0.0011
0.0009 ±0.0008
0.0015 ±0.0008
0.0010 ±0.0011
0.0025 ±0.0012
0.0039 ±0.0018
0.0003 ±0.0027
0.001 3 ±0.0033
0.0002 ±0.0032
0.0000 ± 0.0039
0.0001 ±0.0060
0.0031 ±0.0063
0.0000 ±0.0308
0.0249 ±0.041 6
0.0007 ± 0.0054
0.0003 ±0.0017
0.0017 ±0.0015
0.0109 ±0.0025
0.0022 ± 0.0022
0.02 ±0.03
0.37 ±0.06
7994.70 ± 646.42
13763. 35 ±1093.13
8364. 75 ±580.81
1471 .56 ±93. 54
91 1.66 ±86.07
21 77. 22 ±176.62
3842. 07 ±314.51
965.16 ±112.96
4538.41 ±493.03
0.00 ±438.73
807. 14 ±138. 65
363.46 ±41 .60
352.15±25.44
790.84 ±42.60
252.37 ±12.27
599.53 ±55.72
531 .72 ±43.95
36. 14 ±4.46
267. 78 ±21 .67
280. 14 ±21 .96
272. 78 ±40.21
S6-1
41 .62 ±6.58
21 .352 ±8.475
11.518±2.219
1 .948 ± 0.564
0.788 ±0.214
0.003 ±0.037
35.609 ± 6.209
0.344 ±0.1 01
0.298 ±0.131
0.000 ±0.011
0.639 ±0.1 10
36.249 ± 6.390
0.2440 ±0.21 10
0.01 55 ±0.0382
0.0243 ±0.01 56
0.0471 ±0.0102
0.0431 ±0.0082
0.0953 ±0.01 54
0.0009 ±0.0055
0.0455 ±0.0076
0.1 049 ±0.01 69
0.0024 ±0.01 88
0.001 8 ±0.0080
0.0035 ±0.0014
0.0007 ±0.0009
0.0511 ±0.0083
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0007 ±0.0006
0.0031 ±0.0007
0.0472 ±0.0087
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0001 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0002 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.001 3
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0001 ±0.0026
0.0004 ±0.0035
0.001 7 ±0.0034
0.0006 ±0.0043
0.0003 ±0.0064
0.0023 ±0.0071
0.01 87 ±0.0335
0.0090 ±0.0437
0.0005 ±0.0026
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0003 ±0.0014
0.0000 ±0.0027
0.0001 ±0.0022
0.01 ±0.03
0.14 ±0.05
10408.33 ±828.80
39587.51 ±3140.83
21354.44±1481.49
41 0.25 ±26. 70
3339.84 ±281 .15
41 86.77 ±339.31
6565.46 ± 536.96
341 .40 ±40. 08
11 80.55 ±128.32
0.00 ±404. 12
319.52 ±118.29
123.41 ±36.04
71 .78 ±5.23
389.81 ±21.06
225.57 ±10. 98
223.31 ± 20.88
159.85 ±13. 33
10.33 ±1.43
86.01 ±7.08
71 .59 ±5.68
83.63 ±12.52
S6-2
49. 04 ±7.76
2.715±1.104
2.726 ±0.538
1.780 ±0.536
1 .708 ± 0.464
0.148 ±0.281
9.079 ±1.61 5
7.289 ±1.91 2
29.406 ±14.514
0.057 ±0.01 6
36.603 ±5.789
45.681 ±8.138
0.3421 ±0.2269
0.0890 ±0.0314
0.0054 ±0.0206
0.4305 ±0.0686
0.01 77 ±0.0057
0.4036 ± 0.0640
0.01 29 ±0.0088
0.0055 ±0.0029
0.1 292 ±0.0208
0.0064 ±0.01 96
0.0030 ±0.0084
0.0021 ±0.0015
0.0007 ±0.0010
0.0406 ±0.0067
0.0005 ±0.0010
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0232 ±0.0037
0.0599 ±0.01 06
0.0000 ±0.0022
0.001 2 ±0.0027
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0060 ±0.001 2
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0014 ±0.0014
0.0001 ±0.0022
0.0001 ±0.0028
0.0009 ±0.0037
0.0003 ±0.0035
0.0003 ± 0.0044
0.0000 ±0.0066
0.0021 ±0.0075
0.0009 ±0.0350
0.0142 ±0.0460
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.001 5
0.0003 ±0.001 5
0.0098 ±0.0030
0.0001 ±0.0023
0.01 ±0.03
0.89 ± 0.07
3262.24 ± 293.92
7442.66 ± 591 .96
3688.04 ± 256.55
317.90 ±21. 11
566.26 ±61. 37
11 04.69 ±89.80
1959.21 ± 160.70
167.95 ±19.87
1759.87 ±191 .25
0.00 ±445.34
144.65 ±128.02
67.31 ±39.41
97. 24 ±7.08
305.88 ±16. 58
83.1 7 ±4.24
210.69 ±19. 74
163.67 ±13. 67
8.76 ±1.29
95.81 ±7.88
66.00 ± 5.26
91. 79 ±13.74
S6-3
10.10±1.61
1.584 ±0.453
0.762 ±0.1 82
0.605 ±0.260
0.804 ±0.273
0.002 ±0.037
3. 738 ±0.781
2. 249 ±0.950
2.494 ±0.536
0.000 ±0.01 2
4. 739 ±1.078
8.480 ± 1 .606
0.231 7 ±0.2595
0.0000 ± 0.0474
0.0357 ±0.01 50
0.1 182 ±0.0202
0.0635 ±0.01 11
0.1275 ±0.0205
0.0150 ±0.0055
0.0110 ±0.0033
0.2079 ±0.0331
0.0109 ±0.0188
0.0047 ±0.0081
0.01 73 ±0.0031
0.0022 ±0.0011
0.2292 ±0.0363
0.0012 ±0.0034
0.0026 ±0.0008
0.0145 ±0.0024
0.0972 ±0.01 60
0.0023 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.0022
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0005 ±0.0009
0.0005 ±0.0010
0.0005 ±0.001 3
0.0012 ±0.0013
0.0027 ±0.0019
0.0000 ± 0.0027
0.0021 ±0.0036
0.0005 ± 0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0041
0.0027 ±0.0066
0.0014 ±0.0071
0.0029 ±0.0333
0.0101 ±0.0434
0.0009 ± 0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0002 ±0.001 3
0.0088 ±0.0027
0.0003 ±0.0021
0.00 ±0.03
0.24 ±0.05
2663.67 ± 245.44
8829.54 ±701 .75
4356.98 ±302.85
168.44 ±11. 89
728.85 ±70.87
998.16±81.14
1603.69 ±131 .59
371 .76 ±43.62
471 .76 ±51 .33
0.00 ±400.91
10.40±114.58
15. 13 ±35.38
48.79 ±3. 59
161 .29 ±8.82
61 .07 ±3. 18
98.02 ±9.31
75.98 ±6.45
3. 34 ±0.70
37.86 ±3.27
32.63 ±2.67
34.78 ±5.41
S6-4
22. 84 ±3.62
2. 197 ±0.655
5.693 ±1.276
3.604 ±0.811
2.500 ±0.867
0.004 ±0.036
13. 998 ±2.783
1.383 ±0.550
1 .256 ±0.245
0.047 ±0.022
2.682 ±0.61 6
16.681 ±3.237
0.1 582 ±0.2746
0.0000 ±0.0461
0.0511 ±0.0188
0.3206 ±0.0514
0.031 6 ±0.0073
0.3861 ±0.0612
0.01 12 ±0.0059
0.0311 ±0.0058
0.3050 ± 0.0484
0.0074 ±0.01 82
0.001 3 ±0.0090
0.01 30 ±0.0028
0.0062 ±0.001 5
1.1917±0.1885
0.0048 ±0.01 76
0.0057 ±0.0011
0.0301 ±0.0048
0.1 853 ±0.0296
0.001 9 ±0.001 7
0.0009 ±0.0030
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0006 ±0.0007
0.0005 ±0.0008
0.0007 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.001 3 ±0.001 2
0.0025 ±0.001 8
0.0009 ±0.0024
0.001 3 ±0.0031
0.0008 ±0.0032
0.001 8 ±0.0037
0.0029 ±0.0057
0.0024 ±0.0066
0.0076 ±0.031 2
0.0375 ±0.0411
0.001 5 ±0.0058
0.0001 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.001 3
0.01 58 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.001 9
0.04 ± 0.03
0.70 ± 0.07
1830.59 ±187. 65
7293.35 ±579. 91
3449.06 ± 239.88
199.22 ±13.68
481 .78 ±52. 88
500.95 ±40.90
681 .59 ±56.26
141 .83 ±16.79
90. 07 ±9.91
0.00 ±391 .10
0.00 ±111. 61
0.00 ±34 .47
34. 07 ±2.52
68. 70 ±3.90
19.15±1.41
32.85 ±3.37
24.99 ±2.37
1.92 ±0.58
1 1 .30 ± 1 .34
11.70±1.10
10.95 ±2.08
S7-1
7. 66 ±1.22
1.722 ±0.410
1.493 ±0.301
0.371 ±0.171
0.286 ±0.085
0.001 ±0.025
3. 856 ±0.732
0.585 ±0.1 87
1.736 ±0.31 5
0.000 ±0.008
2. 316 ±0.459
6.173±1.111
0.3097 ±0.1666
0.0141 ±0.0294
0.0096 ±0.01 17
0.0279 ±0.0069
0.051 8 ±0.0088
0.1514 ±0.0241
0.001 9 ±0.0043
0.0072 ± 0.0024
0.1388 ±0.0221
0.0055 ±0.01 36
0.0023 ±0.0061
0.0009 ±0.001 3
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0297 ± 0.0049
0.0004 ± 0.0007
0.0006 ±0.0005
0.0042 ± 0.0008
0.0567 ±0.0095
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0005 ±0.001 3
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0003 ±0.0005
0.0002 ±0.0006
0.0005 ±0.0007
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0006 ±0.0011
0.0020 ±0.0014
0.0004 ±0.0019
0.0011 ±0.0025
0.0003 ±0.0025
0.0006 ±0.0030
0.0015 ±0.0046
0.0032 ±0.0050
0.0031 ±0.0240
0.0192 ±0.0315
0.0004 ± 0.0020
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0006 ±0.0010
0.0006 ±0.001 8
0.0005 ±0.001 6
0.02 ±0.02
0.37 ±0.03
1858.31 ±160.27
3035.79 ±241 .63
1466.67 ±102. 13
104.72 ±7.21
271. 93 ±28.74
433.1 8 ±35.49
674.63 ±55.73
1.84 ±1.22
101.18±11.36
96.62 ±199.97
123.54 ±57.82
26. 30 ±17.59
43.54 ±3. 21
61 .29 ±3.41
17.71 ±1.07
40.57 ±3.91
30.49 ±2.65
1 .49 ± 0.36
17.03 ±1.53
13.76±1.18
25.02 ±3.84
B1-7
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
J-trimethylnaphthalene
1 ,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Dibenzothiophene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
A-methylfluorene
1-methylfluorene
B-methylfluorene
9-fluorenone
Xanthone
Acenaphthenequinone
Perinaphthenone
2-methyi anthracene
3-methyl phenanthrene
2-methyl phenanthrene
9-methyiphenanthrene
1-methylphenanthrene
Anthrone
Anthraquinone
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene
A-dimethylphenanthrene
B-dimethylphenanthrene
C-dimethylphenanthrene
D-dimethylphenanthrene
1 ,7-dimethylphenanthrene
E-dimethylphenanthrene
9-methylanthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
9-Anthraaldehyde
Retene
Benzonaphthothiophene
1 +3-methylfluoranthene
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py
B-MePy/MeFI
C-MePy/MeFI
D-MePy/MeFI
4-methyipyrene
1-methylpyrene
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene
Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Triphenylene
Chrysene
Benzanthrone
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
3-methyl chrysene
Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione
5+6-methylchrysene
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)fluoranthene
BeP
BaP
Perylene
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
Dibenzo(aj)anthracene
lndeno[1 23-cd]pyrene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Benzo(b)chrysene
Picene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Anthanthrene
Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Coronene
Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene
nitro-PAH fug/mile)
1-nitronaphthalene
2-nitronaphthalene
2-nitrobiphenyl
3-nitrobiphenyl
4-nitrobiphenyl
2-nitrofluorene
1 ,3-dinitronaphthalene
S3-2
1.87 ±0.27
2. 08 ±0.41
1.58±0.15
52.21 ±4.02
7. 14 ±0.83
24.87 ±3. 00
2. 89 ±0.35
105.70 ±3.81
8. 53 ±0.89
9.83 ±0.83
9. 22 ±1.25
2.19±0.44
2. 36 ±0.28
0.30 ±0.26
0.86 ±0.29
4.84 ±1.17
7. 14 ±1.36
11. 52 ±0.73
13.36±1.14
7. 32 ±1.26
5. 80 ±0.95
0.04 ±0.09
1.96 ±0.50
2. 13 ±0.92
3.01 ±0.66
1.38 ±0.1 3
4.49 ±0.41
1.09 ±0.20
3. 06 ±0.33
1.72 ±0.36
0.92 ±0.30
55.41 ±3.01
84 .49 ±8. 91
0.33±0.12
0.00±0.10
0.18 ±0.15
2.43 ± 0.74
2. 15 ±0.25
2.93 ±0.55
2.72 ±0.29
1.96±0.13
2.35 ± 0.44
2.04 ± 0.94
1.50 ±0.22
34.59 ±5. 20
4. 57 ±0.98
2. 86 ±0.54
1.73 ±0.29
2. 79 ±0.37
5.10±0.53
0.00 ±0.08
0.36±0.10
3.18±0.21
0.08±0.10
7.51 ±1.45
0.69 ±0.23
5. 77 ±0.69
4.91 ±1.03
0.80 ±0.37
4.61 ±1.42
0.00 ±0.07
1.48 ±0.1 6
6.21 ±1.20
0.32±0.13
0.02 ±0.07
0.52 ±0.24
24.47 ±3. 10
0.45 ±0.1 3
0.07±0.18
0.28±0.10
8.34 ± 1 .43
0.01 ±0.07
0.001 3 ±0.0043
0.0038 ± 0.0074
0.0005 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ± 0.0056
0.0000 ± 0.0028
0.0000 ±0.1 327
S4-1
2.51 ±0.32
1.59 ±0.35
1.94±0.17
13.71 ±1.27
8.24 ±0.90
10.48 ±1.43
0.92 ±0.17
27.03 ±1.1 8
2.42 ±0.29
7.88 ±0.69
6.43 ±0.90
1.68 ±0.35
4.02 ±0.46
0.1 9 ±0.24
0.51 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.26
4.49 ±0.88
6.20 ±0.43
6.83 ±0.63
2.75 ±0.51
3.29 ±0.58
0.31 ±0.16
0.09 ±0.12
0.73 ±0.87
1.21 ±0.30
0.56 ±0.09
1.87 ±0.21
0.45±0.11
1.04±0.15
0.60±0.16
0.72 ±0.27
3.11 ±0.53
2.98 ±0.78
0.07 ±0.09
0.01 ±0.10
0.06 ±0.15
0.14±0.10
0.54±0.11
0.39 ±0.15
0.37 ±0.10
0.30 ± 0.08
0.24 ±0.11
0.79 ± 0.44
0.15 ±0.08
0.67 ±1.00
0.00 ±0.11
0.23 ±0.23
0.26±0.10
0.18±0.13
0.55 ±0.11
0.03 ±0.08
0.05 ±0.07
0.34 ±0.08
0.04 ±0.09
0.00 ±1.01
0.02 ±0.07
0.21 ±0.11
0.10±0.24
0.00 ±0.08
0.46 ±0.93
0.01 ±0.08
0.09 ±0.07
0.27 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.08
0.03 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
0.65 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.07
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.07
0.23 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.07
0.0067 ±0.0043
0.01 53 ±0.0076
0.0008 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0056
0.0000 ±0.0028
0.0000 ±0.1 331
S4-2
3. 37 ±0.34
5. 03 ±0.74
2.89±0.19
20.07 ±1.60
9.41 ±0.83
20.53 ±2.43
0.97 ±0.14
46.71 ±1.71
5. 25 ±0.55
5.21 ±0.44
7. 95 ±1.06
1.93 ±0.37
0.42 ±0.09
0.31 ±0.18
0.87 ±0.26
2. 24 ±0.56
3.48 ±0.67
8. 86 ±0.56
10.01 ±0.85
4. 55 ±0.78
3.81 ±0.62
0.02 ±0.05
0.57 ±0.17
2. 36 ±0.60
1 .90 ± 0.42
1.02 ±0.09
2. 68 ±0.25
0.72 ±0.13
1.57±0.18
0.97 ±0.21
0.20±0.12
7. 97 ±0.54
7. 07 ±0.88
0.39 ±0.11
0.01 ±0.06
0.06 ±0.09
0.71 ±0.23
0.88±0.12
0.70±0.15
0.54 ±0.08
0.62 ±0.06
0.50±0.12
0.16±0.14
0.25 ±0.06
2. 02 ±0.67
0.26±0.10
0.95 ±0.22
0.44 ±0.09
0.70±0.12
1.02±0.12
0.00 ±0.05
0.21 ±0.05
0.45 ±0.05
0.03 ±0.05
1.99 ±0.68
0.05 ±0.05
0.92±0.13
0.49±0.18
0.12±0.08
6.42 ± 1 .47
0.00 ±0.04
0.09 ±0.05
0.42 ±0.11
0.07 ±0.05
0.04 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.06
1.47 ±0.31
0.05 ±0.05
0.30±0.19
0.05 ±0.05
0.39 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.04
0.0000 ±0.0025
0.0201 ± 0.0048
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0017
0.0000 ± 0.0789
S5-1
4.19±0.65
4.19±0.90
3.04 ±0.30
126.68 ±9.29
22.31 ±2.28
44.47 ± 5.56
1.16 ±0.34
45.28 ±2.42
12.63 ±1.34
12.43±1.19
8.65 ±1.30
3.75 ±0.74
2.69 ±0.44
0.00 ±0.51
1 .45 ± 0.55
0.10±0.76
4.96 ±0.98
12.08 ±0.81
13. 76 ±1.28
6.07±1.12
6.46 ±1.14
0.28 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.27
0.75 ±2.48
3.22 ±0.72
1.94 ±0.18
4.94 ± 0.47
1.63 ±0.27
3.60 ±0.39
1.62 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.43
1 1 .06 ± 1 .48
16.40 ±2.71
0.00 ±0.13
0.03 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.25
0.98 ±0.35
0.62±0.15
2.17±0.51
1.60 ±0.23
0.89±0.17
0.87 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.38
0.39±0.15
4.77 ±2. 99
6.44 ± 1 .46
2.77 ±0.67
0.62±0.19
1.21 ±0.30
0.00±0.13
0.23±0.19
1.67 ±0.27
0.03±0.13
0.76 ±0.43
16. 37 ±3.74
1.79 ±0.53
10. 08 ±1.23
13. 19 ±2.56
2.69 ±1.14
1.00 ±2. 67
0.03±0.13
0.23±0.13
4.08 ±0.87
0.00 ±0.14
0.30±0.13
0.84 ±0.42
75. 52 ±9.32
6.27 ±1.22
1.14 ±0.79
1 .47 ± 0.34
49. 24 ±8.21
0.00±0.13
0.0000 ±0.01 65
0.001 2 ±0.021 2
0.0000 ±0.0075
0.0000 ±0.0072
0.0000 ± 0.0244
0.0033 ±0.0143
0.0000 ±0.371 7
S5-2
58. 17 ±5. 12
73.11 ±10.21
45. 97 ±2.66
1060.10±76.94
229.50 ±16. 87
629.80 ±71 .99
28.38 ±2.87
921 .46 ±32. 54
125.72 ±12. 72
300.61 ±22.65
157.88 ±20. 25
77.56 ±13.47
49. 12 ±4.91
2.07 ±1.05
18.05 ±4.79
3.48 ±1.21
183.33 ±33. 78
205.03 ±12. 27
225. 14 ±18. 32
152.22 ±25. 08
97.90 ±15. 19
5.15±1.62
0.00 ±0.28
36.1 8 ±4.85
49.21 ±10.17
22.74 ± 1 .48
78.06 ±6.49
20.09 ±2.87
49. 50 ±4.83
27. 00 ±5.24
22.11 ±5.20
230.25 ±12. 30
330. 19 ±34. 70
5.87 ±1.28
0.11 ±0.19
2.81 ±0.60
40.52 ±12. 12
24. 54 ±2.65
40.41 ±7.21
33. 80 ±3.38
21 .42 ± 0.94
23.42 ±4.20
13. 76 ±6.02
9.17±1.28
97.72 ±14.80
120.66 ±24. 81
36. 65 ±6. 11
20. 57 ±3.21
19. 36 ±2.38
0.02±0.13
1 .34 ± 0.49
12.61 ±1.78
3.29 ±0.22
4.24 ±1.96
93.05 ±11. 56
2.76 ±0.78
47. 22 ±5.37
41 .38 ±7.76
13. 05 ±5. 18
3.33 ±2. 84
0.00±0.13
1.79 ±0.20
40. 93 ±7.72
4.29±1.16
2.03±0.13
2.77±1.10
156.99±19.11
20. 02 ±3.81
6.16±2.57
4.96 ±1.07
65.15 ±10.86
0.61 ±0.19
0.2266 ±0.021 7
0.3247 ±0.0382
0.0511 ±0.0086
0.0146±0.0110
0.0327 ±0.0249
0.0000 ±0.0145
0.0000 ±0.3763
S5-3
5.29 ±0.74
9.34 ±1.53
4.86 ±0.38
265.87 ±19. 38
31 .93 ±2.91
63.10 ±7.64
2.28 ±0.42
136.41 ±5.26
21 .56 ±2.23
40. 13 ±3. 16
31 .80 ±4.21
10.08 ±1.82
0.61 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.50
1 .03 ± 0.46
1.73 ±0.97
4.12±0.84
25.38 ±1.59
28. 06 ±2.41
9.98 ±1.75
10. 35 ±1.74
0.07 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.29
1.95 ±2. 63
5.01 ±1.09
2.37 ±0.21
5.97 ±0.55
1.88 ±0.31
1.92 ±0.24
2.16±0.46
0.08 ±0.46
25. 12 ±1.98
28. 13 ±3.75
0.35 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.19
0.06 ±0.26
1 .34 ± 0.46
1.68 ±0.23
1.23 ±0.39
0.81 ±0.18
1.30±0.19
0.66 ±0.24
0.43 ±0.53
0.53±0.17
6.30 ±3. 22
1.1 3 ±0.46
2.03 ±0.60
0.58±0.19
1.16±0.31
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.16
0.25 ±0.14
0.05±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±3. 06
0.09±0.15
1.57 ±0.35
0.32 ±0.45
0.07±0.18
0.00 ±2. 77
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
3.73±1.16
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.27
0.01 ±0.13
0.89 ±0.27
0.00±0.13
0.1 265 ±0.01 94
0.0000 ±0.0222
0.0000 ±0.0079
0.0431 ±0.0201
0.0149 ±0.0258
0.0204 ±0.01 51
0.0000 ±0.391 8
S5-1
339.91 ± 29.47
328.82 ±45. 50
230.69 ±13. 22
7731 .23 ±560.60
876.84 ± 63.74
2750.00 ±31 3.51
63.03 ±6.30
3562.04 ±125. 19
938.61 ±94.70
541.31 ±40.73
252.1 6 ±32.27
128.34 ±22. 26
27. 74 ±2.82
15.78 ±5.46
24.36 ± 6.44
3.35 ±1.28
149.98 ±27. 65
326.29 ±19. 50
324.23 ± 26.35
391 .43 ±64. 37
155.40 ±24. 07
4.10±1.31
0.07 ±0.34
60.71 ±7.41
69.53 ±14.35
32.90 ±2. 13
135.49 ±11. 25
27.48 ±3.92
92. 96 ±9.06
43. 14 ±8.36
15. 75 ±3.75
906.61 ±47.93
1483.75 ±154.90
6.85 ±1.49
0.04 ±0.20
3.64 ±0.77
63.82 ±19.07
27. 06 ±2.92
63.69 ±11. 33
57. 26 ±5.72
33.01 ± 1 .42
48. 65 ±8.68
46.28 ±19.88
44. 22 ±6.04
437.11 ±64.01
710.41 ±145.56
89.57 ±14.83
42.91 ±6.66
48. 56 ±5.87
0.00±0.15
0.74 ±0.32
12.48 ±1.77
0.13±0.15
2.46±1.19
223.89 ± 26.45
16. 29 ±4.39
129.98 ±14.63
194.86 ±36.17
36.11 ±14.20
4.62 ±3. 31
0.00±0.15
3.08 ±0.30
164.00 ±30.62
4.20 ±1.14
1.94±0.15
3.82 ±1.49
637.1 8 ±76.97
133.99 ±25.38
3.10 ±1.54
15.49 ±3.27
230.26 ±38. 31
2.75 ±0.66
0.1 784 ±0.0223
0.8483 ±0.0829
0.2676 ±0.0200
0.0600 ±0.0264
0.0000 ±0.0283
0.0000 ±0.01 66
0.0000 ±0.4309
S5-5
102.34 ±8.93
75. 25 ±10.52
80.95 ±4. 65
4006. 39 ±290.55
256.22 ±18.84
767.92 ±87.76
26.47 ±2.69
2272.22 ±79.93
556.70 ±56. 18
253.10±19.11
275.63 ±35.26
55. 14 ±9.61
38.26 ±3.85
4.84 ±1.94
7. 86 ±2. 18
8. 59 ±2.26
85.92 ±15. 87
178. 13 ±10.67
182.06 ±14.84
134.44 ±22. 17
80. 69 ±12.56
2. 84 ±0.94
0.90 ±0.43
21.11 ±3.82
26.90 ±5.58
11. 89 ±0.79
51.12±4.27
9. 08 ±1.31
34.12±3.34
17.28 ±3. 37
4.91 ±1.30
568.16±30.10
891. 70 ±93.22
2. 63 ±0.63
0.04 ±0.20
1.09 ±0.36
18.07 ±5.43
14.35 ±1.56
17.71 ±3.20
13.33 ±1.36
12.53 ±0.58
11. 65 ±2. 12
3.80 ± 1 .84
12.85 ±1.78
255.60 ±37.65
154.78 ±31 .82
36.00 ±6. 03
16.73 ±2. 62
17.60±2.18
0.00 ±0.14
0.00±0.18
4. 92 ±0.72
1.87±0.18
0.61 ±0.38
81 .76 ±10.48
4.81 ±1.33
66.62 ±7. 56
48.98 ±9. 18
10.84 ±4. 33
10.43 ±3. 88
0.00 ±0.14
0.98±0.17
44.98 ± 8.48
1.70 ±0.53
0.73 ±0.14
1.27 ±0.57
299.35 ±36.28
29.94 ±5. 69
1.68 ±1.03
7.46 ±1.59
136.11 ±22.66
0.07 ±0.14
0.0678 ±0.01 96
0.0000 ± 0.0241
0.0559 ±0.0096
0.0082 ±0.01 03
0.0000 ± 0.0278
0.0000 ±0.01 63
0.0000 ± 0.4254
S6-1
22. 35 ±2.07
26. 64 ±3.83
21 .09 ± 1 .24
212.53 ±15. 51
104.18±7.88
126.81 ±14.79
7.43 ±0.84
166. 86 ±6.28
15. 92 ±1.67
103.08 ±7.85
64.38 ± 8.34
23.68 ±4. 16
20.20 ±2.07
0.00 ±0.55
0.46 ±0.36
4.87 ± 1 .49
82.11 ±15.16
64.1 6 ±3.89
65. 67 ±5.43
39.49 ±6.59
25. 88 ±4. 11
2.89 ±0.94
0.00 ±0.29
7.71 ±2.81
13.03 ±2.73
6.73 ±0.47
19.18±1.63
4.87 ±0.72
13. 76 ±1.36
6.46 ±1.28
8.71 ±2.13
18. 02 ±1.73
20.99 ±3. 13
0.84 ±0.28
0.02 ±0.18
0.20 ±0.27
5.30 ±1.62
4.43 ±0.51
5.19±1.01
4.27 ±0.46
2.82 ±0.22
1.80 ±0.40
1.43 ±0.86
0.67±0.17
0.82 ±2. 99
1.37 ±0.50
1.84 ±0.57
0.48±0.18
0.44 ±0.26
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.16
0.49±0.15
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.20 ±3. 06
0.12±0.15
0.60 ±0.28
1.19±0.52
0.07±0.18
12.45 ±3.96
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
2.85 ±1.11
0.10±0.14
0.00 ±0.42
0.00±0.13
1.15±0.30
0.00±0.13
0.7249 ± 0.0440
1.1171 ±0.1051
0.2221 ±0.0168
0.0000 ±0.0076
0.0000 ±0.0256
0.661 3 ±0.0380
0.0000 ±0.3897
S6-2
25. 29 ±2.33
34. 36 ±4.91
20.45 ± 1 .22
11 56. 85 ±83.97
229.38 ±16. 91
258.1 7 ±29.75
14.85 ±1.57
769.91 ± 27.27
98.64 ±10.00
81 .65 ±6.27
60.84 ±7.91
20.43 ±3.61
32.04 ±3.25
0.00 ±0.55
7.42 ±2. 07
4.26 ± 1 .43
40.92 ± 7.59
96.05 ± 5.79
105.49 ±8.66
59. 93 ±9.95
44.06 ±6.92
6.73±2.10
0.00 ±0.32
21 .00 ±3.85
28.1 6 ±5.85
14.09 ±0.93
45.46 ±3.80
10. 62 ±1.53
26.01 ±2.55
16.11 ±3.14
3.69 ±1.04
307.62 ±16.40
490.20 ±51 .40
3.28 ±0.76
0.00 ±0.20
0.41 ±0.31
4.24 ±1.31
9.67 ±1.06
12. 83 ±2.34
11.58±1.18
9.1 5 ±0.44
9.47 ±1.73
8.11 ±3.65
5.26 ± 0.76
120.82 ±18. 21
105.29 ±21 .69
16. 89 ±2.90
7.10±1.14
7.39 ±0.98
0.00±0.15
0.00±0.18
2.55 ±0.39
1.09±0.15
0.17±0.22
52. 03 ±7.36
2.44 ±0.70
34. 83 ±4.00
42. 15 ±7.91
8.12±3.27
4.35 ±3. 29
0.00±0.15
0.86±0.16
42. 34 ±8.00
0.63 ±0.29
0.48±0.15
1.1 3 ±0.54
202.46 ±24.62
20. 54 ±3.92
2.60 ±1.36
8.33 ±1.77
100.28 ±16. 70
1.35 ±0.35
0.0510 ±0.01 96
0.0586 ±0.0257
0.0993 ±0.01 13
0.0000 ±0.0084
0.0000 ±0.0283
0.0000 ±0.01 65
0.0000 ±0.4302
S6-3
7. 50 ±0.88
10.56 ±1.68
6. 60 ±0.46
342.24 ±24.91
28.41 ±2.68
69.20 ±8.31
4. 05 ±0.54
21 5.86 ±7. 94
40.95 ±4. 17
34.01 ±2.72
25.84 ± 3.45
9. 96 ±1.80
12.90 ±1.36
2. 09 ±1.06
1.85 ±0.65
1.36 ±0.91
13.24 ±2.50
38.06 ±2.33
41 .62 ±3. 50
19.92 ±3. 37
17.48 ±2. 82
0.32 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.29
3. 75 ±2.65
7. 25 ±1.55
3.47 ±0.27
10.74 ±0.94
3.12±0.47
6.49 ±0.67
3. 63 ±0.74
1.49 ±0.60
51 .42 ±3. 12
49.79 ±5. 78
1.27 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.26
3. 95 ±1.22
3.10±0.37
3.86 ±0.78
2.81 ±0.33
2.73 ±0.21
1.98 ±0.43
1.51 ±0.90
1.28 ±0.24
11. 78 ±3. 57
4. 02 ±0.98
3. 99 ±0.85
1.18±0.26
1.92 ±0.37
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.16
0.68±0.16
0.06±0.13
0.00±0.13
8. 88 ±3.38
1.28 ±0.41
6. 04 ±0.80
3. 75 ±0.89
0.86 ±0.44
0.65 ±2.77
0.00±0.13
0.24±0.13
1.80 ±0.46
0.66 ±0.28
0.63±0.13
0.34 ±0.26
13.01 ±2.00
1.27 ±0.30
0.32 ±0.54
0.27±0.15
4. 23 ±0.75
0.03±0.13
0.0622 ±0.01 79
0.2024 ± 0.0302
0.0390 ± 0.0084
0.0000 ±0.0076
0.0000 ±0.0255
0.0000 ±0.0149
0.0000 ± 0.3877
S6-4
0.00 ±0.51
3.91 ±0.88
2.09 ±0.27
130.67 ±9.59
14. 56 ±1.89
31.61 ±4.19
1.92 ±0.38
105. 52 ±4.23
22. 59 ±2.33
6.96 ±0.87
14. 63 ±2.04
3.80 ±0.75
1.1 3 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.49
0.32 ±0.33
0.74 ±0.83
6.85 ±1.33
14.46 ±0.95
17. 68 ±1.59
8.33 ±1.48
6.54±1.16
0.00±0.19
0.00 ±0.28
1.05 ±2. 53
2.83 ±0.64
1.53 ±0.17
3.89 ±0.39
1.21 ±0.22
2.75 ±0.31
1.33 ±0.31
0.59 ± 0.48
25. 90 ±1.98
21.13±3.11
0.13±0.16
0.04 ±0.18
0.36 ±0.27
1.71 ±0.56
1.63 ±0.23
1 .42 ± 0.41
1.1 5 ±0.20
1.16±0.18
0.98 ± 0.28
0.02 ± 0.41
1.1 8 ±0.23
7.31 ±3.18
0.46 ±0.35
4.62 ±0.94
2.76 ±0.48
2.60 ±0.43
0.08±0.13
0.31 ±0.21
0.86±0.18
0.49±0.13
0.49 ±0.32
17. 69 ±3.88
0.76 ±0.27
8.91 ±1.11
3.85 ± 0.90
1.41 ±0.65
2.58 ± 2.80
0.17±0.17
0.15±0.13
5.30 ±1.10
0.96 ±0.35
0.46±0.13
0.29 ±0.23
15.41 ±2.25
0.48 ±0.17
0.00 ± 0.27
0.35 ±0.15
3.54 ± 0.65
0.04 ±0.13
0.0846 ±0.01 79
0.1 905 ±0.0291
0.0000 ±0.0076
0.0313±0.0161
0.3256 ±0.0309
0.1661 ±0.0172
0.0000 ±0.3788
S7-1
4. 78 ±0.55
0.78 ±0.36
4. 37 ±0.33
59.25 ±4. 66
7. 37 ±1.06
10.67 ±1.61
3.46 ± 0.44
136.63 ±4. 97
0.99 ±0.21
1 1 .42 ± 1 .00
12.01 ±1.65
2.11 ±0.46
1 .40 ± 0.26
0.00 ±0.27
0.81 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.39
26.44 ±4.93
12.48 ±0.83
14.41 ±1.28
7.16±1.28
6. 70 ±1.14
0.84 ±0.34
0.00±0.17
2.11 ±1.33
0.11 ±0.12
1.25 ±0.1 6
4.05 ±0.41
1.06 ±0.22
2.21 ±0.28
1.57 ±0.37
8.66±2.10
27.82 ± 1 .74
22.90 ±2. 74
7. 63 ±1.66
0.00 ±0.15
0.09 ±0.22
1 .62 ± 0.54
0.84 ±0.1 7
1.03 ±0.29
0.59 ±0.14
0.77±0.13
0.90 ±0.25
10.40 ±4. 55
0.76±0.18
7.61 ±1.93
0.00±0.17
1.31 ±0.44
1.97 ±0.35
1.68 ±0.30
1.67 ±0.23
0.00±0.12
0.18±0.11
1.07±0.13
0.01 ±0.11
23.41 ±3.31
0.20±0.13
2.97 ±0.41
1.77 ±0.57
0.82 ±0.38
33.1 2 ±6.86
0.07±0.12
0.11 ±0.11
1 .94 ± 0.43
0.10±0.12
0.20 ±0.11
0.13±0.14
4. 98 ±0.95
0.21 ±0.13
0.22 ±0.32
0.10±0.11
1.12±0.27
0.07 ±0.11
0.0113 ±0.0065
0.0416 ±0.0118
0.001 8 ±0.0030
0.0191 ±0.0078
0.0007 ± 0.0084
0.0155 ±0.0043
0.0000 ±0.1 984
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
1 ,5-dinitronaphthalene
5-nitroacenaphthene
9-nitroanthracene
4-nitrophenanthrene
9-nitrophenanthrene
1 ,8-dinitronaphthalene
2-nitrofluoranthene
3-nitrofluoranthene
1-nitropyrene
7-nitrobenzo(a)anthracene
6-nitrochrysene
6-nitrobenz[a]pyrene
Hooanes (ua/milel
1 8a(H),21 G(H)-22,29,30-Trisnortiopane &
1 7a(H),21 G(H)-22,29,30-Trisnortiopane
1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30-Norhopane
17a(H),21G(H)-Hopane
17G(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30-Homohopane
17G(H),2m(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21G(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan>
22R-17a(H),2m(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22S-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30,31 ,32-Trisomohop:
22R-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30,31 ,32-Trishomoho
Steranes (ug/mile)
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14G(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-cholestane
ster45+40(cholestane)
C28-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan<
C29-20R5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-stigmastan
C29-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-stigmastam
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastam
Alkanes (ua/milel
Dodecane
Tridecane
Norfamesane
Heptylcyclohexane
Famesane
Tetradecane
Octylcyclohexane
Pentadecane
Nonylcyclohexane
Hexadecane
Norpristane
Heptadecane
Decylcyclohexane
Heptadecane_Pristane
Undecylcyclohexane
Octadecane
Phytane
Dodecylcyclohexane
Nonadecane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Eicosane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Heneicosane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Docosane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Tricosane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Tetracosane
Pentacosane
Nonadecylcyclohexane
Hexacosane
Eicosylcyclohexane
Heptacosane
Heneicosylcyclohexane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Triacontane
Hentriacontane
Dotriacontane
S3-2
0.0000 ±0.0053
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0032 ± 0.0030
0.0000 ± 0.0038
0.0061 ±0.0115
0.0000 ± 0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0206
0.0002 ±0.0089
0.0131 ±0.0064
0.0032 ± 0.0009
0.0006 ±0.0015
0.0000 ±0.0072
3.79 ±0.31
0.26±0.10
5.08 ±0.75
4.07 ±0.51
0.32 ±0.08
2.54 ±0.20
2.05±0.18
0.12±0.08
1.67 ±0.24
1.20±0.18
1.12±0.18
0.81 ±0.14
0.14 ±0.08
0.51 ±0.11
0.39 ±0.08
1.47 ±0.21
0.07 ±0.07
0.14 ±0.07
0.28 ±0.09
0.19±0.08
0.35 ±0.09
0.71 ±0.21
0.46 ±0.10
0.41 ±0.09
0.00±3.10
0.19±1.23
0.41 ±0.43
1.52 ±0.70
21 .09 ±8. 88
0.00 ±5.76
0.15±1.73
0.00 ±2.92
0.02 ±2.50
17.84 ±4. 15
11. 09 ±2. 85
35.88 ±4. 94
0.00 ±1.04
29.98 ±4. 03
0.10±0.47
9. 58 ±1.51
6.91 ±0.88
0.67 ±0.31
8.39±1.15
2.84 ±0.89
5.60 ±0.86
0.54 ±0.1 7
4.53 ±0.89
0.00 ±2.30
3.77 ±3.57
1.55 ±0.30
0.92 ±4.64
0.00 ±1.99
0.00 ±1.76
0.00 ±7.94
0.00 ±8.59
0.00 ±2. 11
0.00 ±9.74
0.56±0.18
0.00 ±9.76
0.68 ±0.28
0.00 ±9.51
0.00 ±6.53
0.00 ±5.54
0.07 ±3.26
0.00 ±2.48
S4-1
0.0000 ±0.0053
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0038
0.0000 ±0.01 15
0.0003 ±0.0035
0.0275 ±0.0228
0.0004 ±0.0090
0.0092 ±0.0060
0.0004 ±0.0009
0.0003 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.0072
0.75 ±0.14
0.03 ± 0.07
0.31 ±0.12
0.08 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.07
0.04 ±0.08
0.03 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.07
0.02 ± 0.07
0.09 ± 0.07
0.05 ± 0.07
0.01 ±0.09
0.00 ± 0.07
0.00 ± 0.07
0.00 ± 0.07
0.01 ±0.07
0.02 ±0.07
0.02 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
1.14 ±3. 35
4.33 ±1.76
2.89 ±0.81
0.72 ±0.50
10. 32 ±4.64
2.13±5.99
0.00 ±1.71
18. 16 ±3.60
0.56 ±2. 53
10. 35 ±3.98
1.86 ±1.03
80. 69 ±9.22
4.46 ±1.70
68.41 ±6.25
3.89 ±1.28
69. 02 ±5.26
49.01 ±4.35
3.39 ±1.03
47. 16 ±5. 13
1.01 ±0.53
26.59 ± 1 .76
0.53 ±0.15
30. 85 ±2.08
0.27 ±2. 31
25.31 ±4.51
5.43 ±0.88
24. 73 ±4.99
12.55 ±3.93
0.18±1.80
24. 83 ±9.32
23.07 ±10.55
3.88 ±2. 50
17.21 ±10.81
0.53±0.16
13. 14 ±10.55
0.54 ±0.23
17.81 ±10.11
8.83 ±7. 20
8.77 ±6. 05
26. 57 ±7.77
8.87 ±2. 93
S4-2
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0004 ±0.0018
0.0000 ± 0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0068
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.01 23
0.0007 ± 0.0054
0.0003 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0000 ± 0.0009
0.0000 ± 0.0043
0.75±0.10
0.02 ±0.04
0.60±0.12
0.46 ±0.09
0.03 ±0.04
0.19±0.05
0.15±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.09 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.05
0.11 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.05
0.11 ±0.05
0.17±0.05
0.11 ±0.04
0.26 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.04
0.07 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.04
0.10±0.05
0.06 ±0.05
0.10±0.05
0.00 ±1.71
0.35 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.24
0.18±0.26
0.25 ±0.71
6. 53 ±3.99
0.00 ±1.01
6.41 ±1.92
0.00 ±1.46
9.44 ± 2.44
3.85±1.12
13.03 ±2. 24
0.82 ±0.70
12.50±2.17
0.00 ±0.25
12.02 ±1.22
6.16±0.67
0.68 ±0.25
6. 53 ±0.83
0.00 ±0.24
5.42 ±0.58
0.52±0.15
2.96 ±0.54
0.00 ±1.37
3. 02 ±2. 14
0.43 ±0.11
2. 98 ±2.77
0.00 ±1.1 7
0.00 ±1.04
4. 88 ±4.89
3. 99 ±5.35
0.61 ±1.32
3. 86 ±5.99
0.02 ±0.04
4. 09 ±6.02
0.04 ±0.06
3.17±5.73
1.98 ±4.01
1.71 ±3.36
0.95 ±2.00
0.90 ±1.50
S5-1
0.0000 ±0.0274
0.0000 ±0.0085
0.0000 ±0.01 65
0.0000 ±0.0204
0.0000 ±0.0572
0.0000 ±0.0141
0.0000 ±0.0645
0.01 38 ±0.031 9
0.3376 ±0.0863
0.0455 ±0.0038
0.01 67 ±0.0057
0.0000 ±0.0225
0.00 ± 0.27
0.00 ±0.13
24.22 ± 3.49
21 .59 ± 2.54
0.00±0.13
19. 37 ±1.28
11. 55 ±0.85
0.00±0.13
25. 90 ±3.32
8.21 ±1.01
9.75 ±1.31
7.61 ±1.02
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.20
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
129.55 ±49.48
81 .06 ±19.89
26. 13 ±5.75
5.87 ±2. 34
8.93 ±5. 61
39.67 ±20.27
0.00 ±4. 90
22.45 ±8.99
0.00±7.12
10.43 ±11. 15
6.41 ±3.12
114.30 ±15. 20
0.00 ±3. 02
105.77 ±12. 53
0.00±1.16
6.80 ±3. 66
0.00 ±1.54
0.92 ±0.60
4.83 ±1.66
1.61 ±1.31
2.98 ±2.21
0.36 ±0.18
0.76 ± 2.35
0.00 ±6. 62
0.00±10.11
0.24 ±0.31
0.00 ±13.37
0.00 ±5. 68
0.00 ±5. 06
0.00 ±22.87
0.00 ±24.78
0.00±6.17
0.00±28.19
0.01 ±0.13
0.00 ±28.25
1.68 ±0.68
5. 32 ±27.62
9.41 ±19.49
23.53 ±17.30
20.18 ±11. 65
29. 19 ±8.72
S5-2
0.0000 ±0.0278
0.0000 ±0.0086
0.0000 ±0.01 67
0.0000 ±0.0206
0.0000 ±0.0579
0.0000 ±0.0142
0.0000 ±0.0653
0.0000 ±0.031 5
0.0000 ±0.0202
0.0000 ±0.0029
0.0000 ±0.0057
0.0000 ±0.0228
32. 54 ±2.42
1.73 ±0.38
76.78 ±10.88
65. 54 ±7.57
1.76±0.19
29.44 ±1.97
25. 28 ±1.85
8.45 ±1.11
16.21 ±2.10
12. 26 ±1.50
9.85 ±1.34
6.46 ±0.87
2.69 ± 0.45
6.03 ± 0.90
3.22 ± 0.24
7.02 ± 0.88
0.78 ±0.15
1.53±0.16
2.70 ± 0.37
2.22 ± 0.23
3.57 ±0.40
6.02 ±1.56
3.90 ±0.57
4.89 ±0.47
0.00 ±8. 31
0.00 ±3.48
1.82 ±1.32
5.52 ±2. 26
16. 93 ±8.50
0.00 ±16.78
0.00 ±5. 00
2.57 ±8. 61
0.00 ±7. 24
37.90 ±11. 79
18. 62 ±5.44
7.49 ±7. 57
3.28 ±3. 34
76.40 ± 1 1 .29
0.00 ±1.21
103.47 ±8.78
33. 79 ±3.58
1.37 ±0.71
71. 32 ±8. 10
1.49± 1.32
61 .45 ±4.37
5.35 ±1.25
43. 53 ±3.73
1.76 ±6. 75
32.43 ± 1 1 .06
10. 20 ±1.67
30.59 ±13.82
15.09 ±7.51
0.00±5.15
0.00±23.16
5. 62 ±25.57
0.00±6.19
2.61 ±28.81
3.81 ±0.99
0.00 ±28.48
0.47 ±0.29
0.00 ±27.74
0.00 ±18.95
0.00 ±16. 19
0.00 ±9.41
0.00 ±7. 22
S5-3
0.0068 ±0.0296
0.0000 ±0.0091
0.0349 ±0.01 76
0.0000 ±0.021 5
0.0000 ±0.0604
0.0000 ±0.0148
0.0000 ±0.0680
0.0000 ±0.0328
0.0290 ±0.0246
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0059
0.0000 ±0.0237
3.47 ± 0.46
0.12 ±0.14
8.38 ±1.28
5.14±0.71
0.83±0.15
2.56 ±0.26
1.87 ±0.22
1.30 ±0.21
3.20 ±0.46
0.78±0.18
0.66±0.19
0.53±0.15
0.00 ±0.14
0.77 ±0.18
0.39 ±0.13
0.63 ± 0.24
0.09 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.17±0.13
0.45 ±0.14
0.58 ±0.20
0.37 ±0.14
0.35±0.13
0.00 ±8. 57
0.00 ±3. 62
0.00 ±1.14
0.00 ±1.11
7.36 ±5. 24
26.03 ±19.67
0.00±5.15
18. 36 ±9.30
0.00 ±7.44
5.71 ±11.70
3.78 ±2. 85
10.48 ±7.96
0.00±3.15
15. 24 ±9.74
0.00 ±1.28
10. 17 ±3.93
6.32 ±1.82
0.93 ±0.63
9.29 ±2. 04
0.00 ±1.19
6.99 ± 2.38
1.21 ±0.35
4.82 ± 2.52
0.00 ±6. 99
0.00 ±10.69
1.35 ±0.42
0.00 ±14.08
0.00 ±5. 95
0.00 ±5. 32
0.00 ±24.07
0.00 ±26.02
0.00 ±6.41
0.00 ±29.58
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±29.67
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±28.88
0.00 ±19.72
0.00 ±16.69
0.00 ±9. 59
0.00 ±7. 50
S5-4
0.0000 ±0.031 8
0.0000 ±0.0099
0.0000 ±0.01 92
0.0000 ±0.0236
0.0000 ±0.0664
0.0487 ±0.0228
0.0000 ±0.0748
0.0458 ± 0.0384
0.1 260 ±0.0427
0.0005 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0065
0.1 036 ±0.0269
38.21 ±2.95
2. 14 ±0.46
100.13±14.15
76. 25 ±8.79
13.42 ±1.07
44. 92 ±2.99
38. 94 ±2.83
12. 82 ±1.66
27. 28 ±3.50
20.51 ±2.49
18. 00 ±2.43
1 1 .43 ± 1 .52
2.50 ± 0.44
6.07 ±0.91
3.85 ± 0.28
6.47 ± 0.83
1.13±0.19
1.71 ±0.18
2.95 ± 0.41
2.50 ± 0.25
4.90 ±0.53
7.57 ±1.95
5.12±0.74
5.72 ±0.55
0.00 ±10.41
1.16±4.16
7.94 ±2. 39
0.24 ±1.32
0.00 ±3. 69
2. 97 ±19.78
0.00 ±5. 67
4.22 ±9. 88
2.40 ±8. 50
0.00 ±12.74
8.94 ±3. 88
0.00±8.16
0.00 ±3.47
0.00 ±10.48
4.06 ±2. 26
0.00 ±4. 07
109.74 ±9.97
0.23 ±0.55
90.92 ±10.22
5.43 ±2.10
52. 50 ±4. 14
1 .57 ± 0.43
31 .00 ± 3.46
0.00 ±7. 68
0.00 ±11. 72
4.41 ±0.84
8. 86 ±15.57
5.73 ±7. 13
0.00 ±5. 87
0.00 ±26.45
0.00 ±28.71
0.00 ±7. 08
0.00 ±32.53
4.51 ±1.18
0.00 ±32.64
1.48 ±0.63
0.00 ±31 .76
0.00 ±21 .70
0.00 ±18.37
0.00 ±10.53
0.00 ±8. 25
S5-5
0.01 38 ±0.0324
0.0000 ± 0.0097
0.0000 ±0.01 89
0.0000 ± 0.0232
0.0000 ±0.0652
0.0000 ±0.01 60
0.0000 ± 0.0735
0.0000 ± 0.0354
0.0000 ± 0.0227
0.0000 ± 0.0033
0.0000 ± 0.0064
0.0000 ±0.0256
18.98 ±1.44
0.80 ±0.22
51 .03 ±7. 28
35.17±4.12
5. 14 ±0.43
18.06 ±1.23
15.10±1.12
1.61 ±0.25
10.85 ±1.42
6.71 ±0.85
5. 34 ±0.75
3. 62 ±0.50
1.93 ±0.36
5.04 ±0.76
2.46 ±0.21
5.22 ±0.68
0.73±0.17
1.05±0.16
1.68 ±0.28
1.77 ±0.20
2. 54 ±0.30
4.45 ±1.1 6
2. 74 ±0.41
2. 94 ±0.31
2.44 ±10. 76
0.13 ±4.03
3. 36 ±1.65
1 .23 ± 1 .44
32. 29 ±14.62
0.00 ±18. 99
2.40 ±5.75
0.00 ±9.59
1.37 ±8.28
0.00 ±12. 58
0.83 ±2.71
33.56 ±9. 73
0.00 ±3.45
39. 95 ±11. 05
1.67 ±1.76
0.00 ±4.03
30.28 ±3.44
0.18±0.54
18.79±2.94
2.70 ±1.62
14.66 ±2. 73
3.89 ±0.93
6.81 ±2.75
0.00 ±7.55
4.12±11.61
4. 36 ±0.83
10.44 ±15.31
0.00 ±6.56
0.00 ±5.75
0.00 ±26. 15
0.00 ±28. 22
0.52±7.10
0.00 ±32. 07
0.26±0.17
0.00 ±32. 09
2.91 ±1.13
0.00 ±31 .22
0.00 ±21 .33
0.00 ±18. 06
0.00 ±10.40
0.00 ±8. 11
S6-1
0.0000 ±0.0288
0.0001 ±0.0093
0.0000 ±0.01 73
0.0000 ±0.0214
0.0000 ±0.0600
0.0000 ±0.01 48
0.0541 ±0.0733
0.1 932 ±0.0491
0.0541 ±0.0280
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0059
0.0000 ±0.0236
7.41 ± 0.65
0.00 ±0.13
16. 94 ±2.48
10.13±1.26
1.67±0.19
4.77 ±0.37
3.63 ±0.32
0.00±0.13
2.52 ±0.38
1.70 ±0.26
1.30 ±0.25
0.96±0.19
0.29 ±0.16
1 .45 ± 0.26
0.76 ±0.14
1.80 ±0.32
0.21 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.37 ±0.16
0.47 ±0.14
0.81 ±0.16
1.1 6 ±0.34
0.78±0.18
0.84±0.15
7. 02 ±10.84
0.00 ±3. 65
53.48 ± 1 1 .24
29.01 ±8.91
0.50 ±3.48
0.00 ±17.64
56.87 ±11. 20
779.69 ± 76.36
3.29 ±7. 77
2. 32 ±11. 61
18. 18 ±5.39
1 08.43 ± 14.91
10. 55 ±4.54
155.03 ±15. 57
0.00±1.10
2.64 ±3. 76
27. 36 ±3. 10
7.76 ±2.40
12. 83 ±2.31
2.22 ±1.45
24.98 ± 2.82
9.06 ± 2.07
15. 57 ±2.72
0.00 ±6. 95
6. 26 ±10.72
2.64 ±0.58
0.00 ±14.03
8.28 ±6. 78
0.00 ±5. 30
0.00 ±23.92
0.00 ±26.07
0.00 ±6. 38
0.00 ±29.43
0.44±0.19
0.00 ±29.50
0.40 ±0.28
0.00 ±28.82
0.00 ±19.62
0.00 ±16.69
0.00 ±9. 54
0.00 ±7.46
S6-2
0.001 5 ±0.0322
0.0000 ±0.0099
0.2464 ± 0.0236
0.0000 ±0.0236
0.0777 ±0.0665
0.0000 ±0.01 63
0.4372±0.1513
0.1 567 ±0.0477
0.5033 ±0.1 254
0.1 100 ±0.0068
0.0000 ±0.0065
0.0000 ±0.0260
2.47 ± 0.39
0.14 ±0.15
4.71 ±0.82
2.65 ±0.49
0.34±0.15
1.24 ±0.22
1.02 ±0.20
0.57±0.17
0.65±0.19
0.40±0.16
0.33±0.18
0.23±0.15
0.16±0.16
1.21 ±0.24
0.50 ±0.15
0.52 ± 0.25
0.01 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.15
0.13±0.15
0.44±0.16
0.59 ±0.22
0.44±0.16
0.38±0.16
0.00 ±9.43
0.00 ±3. 97
6.62±2.17
0.00 ±1.23
0.00 ±3. 61
0.00 ±19. 19
2.37 ±5. 83
171 .65 ±20. 27
0.71 ±8.37
0.00 ±12.72
16. 97 ±5.35
0.00 ±8. 24
0.00 ±3.48
48.39 ± 1 1 .43
0.00±1.18
82. 96 ±7.75
32. 63 ±3.62
0.81 ±0.65
77. 58 ±8.82
1.45± 1.48
58. 76 ±4.41
0.93 ± 0.29
30.89 ± 3.45
0.00 ±7. 67
17.65 ±12.05
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±15.48
0.00 ±6. 60
0.00 ±5. 85
0.00 ±26.46
0.00 ±28.63
0.00 ±7. 08
0.00 ±32.53
0.10±0.16
0.00 ±32.60
0.53 ±0.33
0.00 ±31 .73
0.00 ±21 .68
0.00 ±18.34
1.97 ±11. 07
0.00 ±8. 25
S6-3
0.0000 ±0.0289
0.0000 ±0.0089
0.1847 ±0.0201
0.0000 ±0.0213
0.0000 ±0.0597
0.0000 ±0.0147
0.01 33 ±0.0695
0.0000 ±0.0326
0.0656 ±0.0297
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ± 0.0058
0.0000 ± 0.0234
0.65 ±0.31
0.00±0.13
1.73 ±0.41
0.57 ±0.30
0.10±0.13
0.23±0.18
0.20±0.15
1.07 ±0.20
0.00±0.13
0.18±0.15
0.14±0.16
0.32 ±0.14
0.00±0.13
0.06±0.13
0.03±0.13
0.05 ±0.21
0.04 ±0.1 3
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.05±0.13
0.13±0.14
0.08±0.13
0.05±0.13
0.00 ±8.55
0.00 ±3.58
0.00±1.16
8.64±3.12
0.00±3.17
17. 05 ±18.72
5. 33 ±5.40
50. 04 ±10.59
1.52 ±7.60
42. 66 ±12.23
10.43 ±3. 90
52. 69 ±10.36
0.06±3.17
54. 10 ±10.65
0.14 ±1.37
20.52 ±4. 21
8. 86 ±1.92
1.04 ±0.65
15.19±2.51
0.00 ±1.1 9
7.06 ±2.37
0.51 ±0.20
2.12±2.46
0.00 ±6.91
0.00 ±10. 54
0.61 ±0.35
0.00 ±13. 93
0.00 ±5.90
0.00 ±5.26
0.00 ±23. 82
0.00 ±25. 75
0.00 ±6.36
0.00 ±29. 28
0.21 ±0.16
0.00 ±29. 38
0.30 ±0.26
0.00 ±28. 59
0.00 ±19. 52
0.00 ±16. 53
0.00 ±9.50
0.00 ±7.43
S6-4
0.0000 ±0.0279
0.0664 ± 0.0254
0.0298 ±0.01 70
0.0000 ±0.0207
0.0000 ±0.0583
0.0000 ±0.0144
0.0794 ±0.0741
0.0236 ±0.0328
0.2609 ±0.0694
0.0238 ±0.0032
0.0066 ±0.0057
0.0000 ±0.0229
2.80 ± 0.40
0.31 ±0.15
7.09±1.11
4.85 ± 0.68
0.70 ±0.14
2.41 ±0.25
2.40 ±0.24
0.01 ±0.13
1.46 ±0.25
0.99±0.19
0.80±0.19
0.56±0.15
0.09 ±0.14
1.28 ±0.23
0.56 ±0.13
1.27 ±0.27
0.17±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.16 ±0.14
0.33±0.13
0.58 ±0.14
0.90 ±0.27
0.53±0.15
0.55 ±0.14
0.00 ±8. 27
0.00 ±3. 50
3.43 ± 1 .54
0.00 ±1.09
17.49 ±8.72
25.09 ±19.00
0.00 ±4. 99
3.32 ±8. 66
0.00±7.18
0.00 ±11. 21
0.22 ±2. 37
0.00 ±7. 33
0.00 ±3. 04
3.64 ±9. 27
0.00 ±1.29
0.68 ±3. 63
2.46 ±1.63
0.00 ±0.43
1.97 ±1.54
0.00 ±1.15
0.87 ± 2.23
0.07 ±0.15
0.00 ± 2.38
0.00 ± 6.74
0.00 ±10.29
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±13.59
0.00 ±5. 77
0.00 ±5. 14
0.00 ±23.23
0.00±25.12
0.00±6.19
0.00 ±28.56
0.36±0.17
0.00 ±28.63
0.03 ±0.21
0.00 ±27.89
0.00 ±19.04
0.00 ±16. 14
0.00 ±9. 26
0.00 ±7. 24
S7-1
0.0007 ± 0.0081
0.0143 ±0.0056
0.0000 ± 0.0044
0.0052 ± 0.0056
0.0000 ±0.01 71
0.0247 ± 0.0088
0.0000 ±0.0308
0.0452 ±0.01 61
0.1 183 ±0.0244
0.0067 ±0.0014
0.0035 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.01 07
1.46 ±0.23
0.20±0.12
3.02 ±0.49
2.01 ±0.32
0.18±0.11
0.81 ±0.14
0.70±0.13
0.46±0.13
0.51 ±0.14
0.33±0.12
0.17±0.12
0.12±0.11
0.24 ±0.1 2
1.00 ±0.20
0.47 ±0.11
1.06 ±0.20
0.10±0.11
0.23 ±0.11
0.24 ±0.1 2
0.25 ±0.11
0.27±0.12
0.52 ±0.20
0.35±0.12
0.34±0.12
0.00 ±4.27
0.00 ±1.79
6. 36 ±1.58
0.38 ±0.63
0.00 ±1.60
0.00 ±8.73
6. 59 ±2.95
75.01 ±8.90
0.19±3.73
0.00 ±5.71
1.05 ±1.32
0.65 ±3.76
1.31 ±1.67
0.14 ±4.70
0.00 ±0.65
3.01 ±1.89
2. 63 ±0.89
12.36 ±3. 56
40.27 ±4. 54
1.28 ±0.75
1 1 .96 ± 1 .39
11. 28 ±2. 59
30.89 ±2. 34
0.00 ±3.43
16.88 ±5. 66
0.66 ±0.23
14.03 ±7.03
1.43 ±3.08
7.41 ±3.48
2.33 ±11. 94
29. 34 ±15.14
2. 87 ±3.41
22. 67 ±15.86
1.53 ±0.42
30. 35 ±16.59
5. 05 ±1.85
27.60 ±15.10
27.43 ±12.37
28. 29 ±10.51
23.20 ±8. 23
18.46 ±4. 82
B1-9
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Tritriacontane
Tetratriacontane
Pentatriacontane
Hexatriacontane
Heptatriacontane
Octatriacontane
Nonatriacontane
Polar comoounds (uo/mile)
heptanoic acid (c7)
me-malonic (d-c3)
guaiacol
benzoic acid
octanoic acid (c8)
phenylacetic acid
maleic acid
succinic acid (d-c4)
4-me-guaiacol
o-toluic
me-succinic acid (d-c4)
m-toluic
nonanoic acid (c9)
p-toluic
2,6-dimethylbenzoic acid
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid (d-c5)
2-methyiglutaric (d-c5)
2,5-dimethylbenzoic acid
3-methyiglutaric acid (d-c5)
2,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
2,3- and 3,5- dimethylbenzoic acid
decanoic acid (c10)
4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyi-syringol
3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
hexanedioic (adipic) acid (d-c6)
salcylic acid
trans-2-decenoic acid
cis-pinonic acid
3-methyiadipic acid (d-c6)
4-formyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid (c11)
isoeugenol
heptanedioic (pimelic) acid (d-c7)
2,3-dimethoxybenzoic acid
acetovanillone
2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid
dodecanoic (lauric) acid (c12)
2,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
phthalic acid
suberic acid (d-c8)
levoglucosan
3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
syringaldehyde
3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
tridecanoic acid(c13)
isophthalic acid
vanillic acid
homovanillic acid
azelaic acid (d-c9)
myristoleic acid
myristicacid (c14)
sebacicacid (d-c10)
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid (c15)
undecanedioic acid (d-d 1 )
palmitoleic acid
palmitic acid (c16)
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid (d-c12)
traumatic acid
heptadecanoic acid (c17)
1,11-undecanedicartoxylicacid (d-c13)
oleic acid
elaidic acid
stearic acid (c18)
1,12-dodecanedicartoxylicacid (d-c14)
8,15-pimaradien-18-oic acd
pimaric acid
S3-2
0.00 ±0.96
0.16±1.13
0.56 ±0.53
0.04 ±0.46
0.30 ±0.28
0.12 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.13
17.86 ±4.67
0.00 ±1.26
0.00 ±0.14
2344.72 ±1295.09
25. 55 ±10.72
41 .03 ±36.61
0.00 ±1.64
0.59 ±10. 71
0.00 ±0.06
46.60 ±8. 29
0.10 ±1.61
70.87 ±5. 05
16. 90 ±11. 49
53.36 ±8. 34
4.91 ±2.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.07
0.00±0.10
0.03 ±0.07
7. 22 ±4.08
0.01 ±3.22
258.91 ±213.59
3. 77 ±1.02
2.20 ±3.20
22.52 ±2.47
0.00 ±0.06
7.79 ±2.34
0.47 ±0.95
2.16±2.81
0.00 ±0.46
0.00 ±3.47
11. 23 ±2. 01
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±1.38
1 .46 ± 0.64
0.00 ±1.01
0.01 ±0.07
28.00 ±4.49
0.13±0.08
30. 60 ±35.00
0.00 ±0.73
158.58 ±40.76
0.00 ±18. 94
1.18±1.90
0.16±0.41
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.54
58.34 ±80.72
0.00 ±5.39
7. 68 ±3.71
0.00 ±4.88
1.68 ±0.39
27. 36 ±12.79
0.00 ±1.03
1.56 ±0.56
0.00 ±2.85
0.01 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.78
0.00 ±17. 51
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±3.30
0.05±0.10
0.00 ±5.08
0.00 ±0.81
19.44 ±25.95
0.02 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.40
2. 74 ±0.64
S4-1
7.16±3.09
4.34 ±1.98
2.20 ±0.99
3.92 ±0.66
1.77 ±0.77
1 .84 ± 1 .30
0.01 ±0.13
19.74 ±4.74
28.63 ±7.37
0.76 ±0.22
1343.50 ±1270.31
32.43 ± 1 1 .03
0.17±24.38
8.86 ±2. 20
6. 39 ±10.79
0.00 ±0.08
63.86 ±10.68
1 .62 ± 1 .63
128.81 ±8.42
50.96 ±18.02
99.02 ±14.37
0.62 ±1.95
0.26 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.06
1.25 ±0.14
1 .48 ± 0.43
15.49 ±6.20
23. 79 ±5.07
352.96 ±220. 12
5.14±1.21
0.00 ±3.41
42. 62 ±4.48
0.00 ± 0.06
18. 09 ±2.97
0.00 ±0.93
2.13±2.80
0.00 ±0.46
0.00 ±3.47
1.17±0.35
0.68 ±0.75
0.03 ±1.40
0.00 ±0.28
0.48 ±1.02
0.00 ±0.06
2.68 ±3. 94
0.00 ±0.06
21 .97 ±35.02
13. 82 ±3.47
144.73 ±38.71
0.00 ±19.04
0.90 ±1.78
1.1 8 ±0.43
1 .87 ± 0.44
6.33 ±2. 34
3.74 ±0.27
1.99 ±0.67
70.50 ±79.73
30. 86 ±6.78
14. 89 ±5.57
10. 70 ±5.03
28. 97 ±3.54
62.53 ±20.76
0.00 ±1.04
2.72 ±0.67
1.87 ±2. 89
1.00 ±0.63
0.00 ±0.75
9.11 ±20.12
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.06
1.00 ±3. 54
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±5. 55
2.39 ±0.84
0.00 ±20.20
2.09 ±0.68
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.50
S4-2
0.25 ±0.61
0.64 ±0.72
0.26 ±0.29
0.33 ±0.28
0.19 ±0.17
0.16 ±0.23
0.04 ±0.08
4. 20 ±4.35
0.00 ± 1 .24
0.00 ±0.11
11 07.09 ±1240.91
4. 76 ±9.97
0.00 ±26. 62
0.00 ±1.60
0.00 ±10. 61
0.00 ±0.05
26.68 ±5. 75
0.00 ±1.59
48.79 ±3. 88
5.40 ±9.81
36.43 ±6. 14
3. 62 ±1.92
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.05
2. 94 ±2.78
8.21 ±3.55
607.47 ± 232.39
4.48 ±0.91
10.43 ±3. 51
7.09 ±0.78
0.21 ±0.09
9.06 ±2.38
0.00 ±0.91
18.96 ±4.40
2. 93 ±0.54
0.00 ±3.43
172.20 ±29.98
5. 59 ±1.55
0.65 ±1.48
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±1.00
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±3.89
8. 06 ±2.84
37. 20 ±34.69
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±25. 36
10. 76 ±19.33
0.00 ±1.52
2. 37 ±0.46
1.54 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.05
0.49 ±0.59
0.00 ±77.02
0.00 ±5.35
1.92 ±2.60
0.00 ±4.84
0.42 ±0.26
7. 69 ±8.51
0.00 ±1.02
0.00 ±0.50
3. 05 ±2.94
0.00±0.10
0.10±0.95
1.08 ±15. 79
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±3.30
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±5.34
0.00 ±0.80
0.00 ±17. 99
0.85 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.40
0.06 ±0.49
S5-1
15. 98 ±7.36
22. 09 ±8. 12
12. 10 ±4.60
21 .07 ±2.67
9.80 ±3. 71
22.33 ±12.51
4.62 ±1.57
0.00 ±8. 38
0.00 ± 1 .48
0.13±0.16
0.00 ±2329. 30
0.00 ±15.26
0.00 ±32.28
48. 07 ±8.20
79.89 ±23. 19
0.00 ±0.66
16. 26 ±6. 16
1 1 .46 ± 3.46
26. 25 ±4.81
0.00 ±17.36
15. 85 ±5.55
0.00 ±2. 55
0.02±0.18
0.10±0.11
33. 52 ±2.00
0.88 ±0.32
0.00 ±3. 67
5.95 ±5. 86
0.00 ±352.53
0.00 ±0.58
0.00 ±4.41
33. 85 ±3.71
0.00±0.10
1.23±3.15
28. 53 ±6.06
17. 32 ±5.83
0.00 ±0.65
0.00 ±4. 63
38. 20 ±6.75
6.25 ±1.96
4.04 ±2. 59
0.00 ±0.33
11. 86 ±2.37
0.00±0.10
0.00 ±3. 89
0.00±0.10
0.00 ±51 .24
0.00 ±1.28
77.1 5 ±45.36
0.00 ±25.23
5.84 ±3. 56
0.51 ±0.77
1.22 ±0.33
1.97 ±1.23
2.07 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.54
147.90 ±97.70
7.42±6.12
28. 17 ±9.76
30.01 ±6.55
7.19±1.21
23.28 ±17.81
1.84±1.17
3.04 ±0.77
0.16±3.59
0.45 ±0.51
2.26±2.17
427.22 ±186.59
0.00 ±0.52
0.00 ±5. 85
0.00±0.10
12. 68 ±9. 17
0.00 ±0.11
167.53 ±96.70
1 1 .50 ± 1 .26
259.00 ±131 .69
0.02 ±0.32
3.81 ±3.76
6.75 ±1.28
S5-2
0.00 ±2. 69
0.00 ±3. 08
0.00 ±1.11
0.00 ±1.33
0.00 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.71
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±8. 52
0.00 ±1.50
0.00±0.15
0.00 ±2356.49
0.00 ±15.74
83.63 ±61 .99
0.00 ±1.64
0.00 ±19.46
0.00 ±0.11
284.89 ±43. 62
0.00 ±2. 88
388.63 ±24. 93
0.00 ±18.56
320.88 ±45. 53
35. 50 ±6.49
2.18±2.06
1.32 ±0.54
60. 12 ±3.64
0.00 ±0.11
34.89 ±13.94
50.51 ±10.01
0.00 ±358.63
31 .96 ±5.86
0.00 ±4.46
52. 26 ±5.79
0.00 ±0.11
63. 79 ±7.88
0.00 ±1.67
2.31 ±4.90
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±4.49
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.75
0.83 ±2. 37
1.00 ±0.58
3.32 ±1.35
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±3. 94
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±51 .84
0.00 ±1.29
52.29 ±43.79
0.00 ±25.86
0.00 ±1.55
0.00 ±0.77
0.00 ±0.11
51 .63 ±18.70
31 .70 ±2.27
1.15±1.00
106.08 ±94. 66
24. 87 ±7.67
0.00 ±2. 97
20. 52 ±6. 19
37. 30 ±4.82
0.00 ±9. 50
0.00 ±1.26
23. 88 ±2.87
0.00 ±3. 55
0.52 ±0.66
0.00 ±0.92
0.00 ±25.81
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.11
0.00±6.15
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±18.95
0.00 ±0.73
0.00 ±34 .41
3.70 ±1.30
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±0.87
S5-3
0.00 ±2. 79
0.00 ±3. 20
0.00±1.16
0.00 ±1.38
0.00 ±0.51
0.00 ±0.74
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±8. 83
0.00 ±1.56
2.28 ±0.48
0.00 ±2465. 53
0.00 ±16.03
175.80 ±87. 56
0.00 ±1.71
0.00 ±20.35
0.00 ±0.11
21. 17 ±6.72
0.00 ±3. 03
0.65 ±4. 66
0.00 ±17.01
0.00 ±4. 68
0.00 ±2. 68
4.40 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.11
0.00±0.15
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±3. 73
0.00 ±6. 01
0.00 ±371 .25
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±4. 64
0.00 ±0.16
22. 94 ±7.41
18. 83 ±4.02
0.00 ±1.80
66.12 ±12.38
0.00 ±0.55
0.00 ±4. 77
1928.71 ±334.81
0.00 ±0.77
0.00 ±27.03
0.00 ±0.33
0.00±1.17
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4. 10
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±53.98
0.00 ±1.35
7154.14±1394.11
165.1 8 ±66.94
0.00 ±99.86
0.00 ±2.44
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.49
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±89.95
0.00±6.10
0.00 ±2. 64
0.00 ±5. 82
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±6.49
0.00±1.18
0.00 ±0.61
0.00 ±3. 58
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.96
0.00 ±9.44
0.00 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±6. 25
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±5. 89
0.00 ±0.73
0.00±32.18
0.00 ±0.26
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±0.90
S5-4
0.00 ±3. 08
0.00 ±3. 51
0.00 ±1.27
0.00 ±1.52
0.00 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.81
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±9. 71
0.00 ±1.71
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±2710. 54
0.00 ±17.63
0.00 ±37.43
0.00 ±1.88
0.00 ±22.21
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±5. 99
0.00 ±3. 30
856.76 ± 53.74
0.00 ±18.71
941. 54 ±130.52
0.00 ±15.56
0.00±0.12
0.00±0.12
0.00±0.15
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±4. 10
0.00 ±6. 61
888.00 ±476.33
27.42 ± 5.40
0.00 ±15.29
0.00 ± 0.48
0.00 ±0.12
98.46 ± 1 1 .53
0.00 ±1.92
20. 66 ±7.01
0.00 ±0.61
0.00±5.16
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.84
0.00 ±2. 63
0.00 ±0.36
0.00 ±1.29
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±4. 51
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±59.36
0.00 ±1.48
6990. 63 ±1367. 29
0.00 ±28.81
0.00 ±113.45
0.00 ±0.89
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±98.92
0.00 ±6. 71
0.00 ±2. 91
0.00 ±6.40
0.00 ±0.27
137.09 ±47. 97
0.00 ±1.30
0.00 ±2. 32
0.00 ±3. 94
0.00±0.13
83.23 ±35.77
88.06 ±69. 16
0.00 ±1.48
0.00 ±1.49
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±6. 87
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±6.48
0.00 ±0.80
0.00 ±35.39
0.00 ±0.29
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.99
S5-5
0.00 ±3.01
0.00 ±3.46
0.00 ±1.25
0.00 ±1.50
0.00 ±0.56
0.00 ±0.80
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±9.54
0.00 ±1.68
0.00±0.17
5456.32 ± 2852.34
390.36 ±44.97
0.00 ±37. 37
0.00 ±1.85
276.63 ±46. 19
0.00±0.12
303.21 ±46.77
15.67 ±4. 12
499.80 ±32.03
270.23 ±76.69
460.76 ±64.97
30.33 ±8. 85
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.52
0.00 ±0.14
14.56 ±4. 06
12.63 ±8. 68
0.00 ±6.51
274.83 ± 430.73
62. 22 ±10. 18
18.92 ±7. 05
13.22 ±1.80
1.11 ±0.49
11 8.96 ±13.64
26.43 ±5. 84
12.28 ±6. 31
2.48 ±0.84
0.00 ±5.06
680.29 ±118. 74
11. 32 ±3. 21
0.00 ±11. 62
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±1.27
66.55 ± 24.45
0.00 ±4.43
37. 62 ±13.46
214.04 ±61 .49
0.00 ±1.58
0.00 ±45. 68
59. 90 ±40.01
0.00 ±1.72
0.00 ±1.32
3. 73 ±0.91
0.00 ±0.53
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.59
0.00 ±97. 24
0.00 ±6.59
0.00 ±2.86
0.00 ±6.29
0.00 ±0.27
25. 86 ±20.15
0.00 ±1.28
0.00 ±0.79
0.00 ±3.87
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±1.04
0.00 ±25. 05
0.00 ±0.59
0.00 ±0.41
0.00±0.12
27.21 ±14.57
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±6.38
0.00 ±0.79
0.00 ±34. 79
0.00 ±0.28
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.97
S6-1
0.00 ±2. 79
0.00 ±3. 20
0.1 8 ±1.34
0.00 ±1.38
0.32 ±0.75
3.22 ±2. 79
0.00 ±0.28
75.28 ±10.73
17. 60 ±5.71
5.51 ±1.52
6265.03±2659.13
132.08 ±22. 93
0.00 ±33.91
0.00 ±1.70
0.00 ±20.09
1.37±0.15
417.86 ±63. 15
0.00 ±2. 99
242.51 ± 15.76
139.58 ±45. 71
138.84 ±20. 88
50.42 ± 5.94
2.61 ±2.15
2.44 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.14
19. 82 ±5.50
0.00 ±4. 37
0.00 ±5. 99
171 0.78 ±509.00
17.42 ±3.85
0.00 ±25.01
0.00 ± 0.29
0.23 ±0.13
28. 27 ±4.67
38. 79 ±7.98
80.95 ±14.57
1.15±0.81
0.00 ±5. 01
389.67 ± 67.80
57.43 ±14.25
8.67 ±6. 39
0.24 ±0.91
76.30 ±12.34
494.86 ±181 .60
0.00 ±4. 22
0.00 ±7. 11
36.73 ±54. 18
8.36 ±2. 55
178. 16 ±58. 91
15.87 ±30.53
0.00±3.12
5.19±0.96
0.00 ±0.11
41.10±14.99
24.61 ±1.73
1.50 ±0.93
84.96 ± 95.94
24. 08 ±7.76
0.00 ±2. 90
2.37 ±5. 87
59. 69 ±7.53
37.22 ±21 .72
0.00 ±1.45
29. 79 ±3.56
0.96 ±3. 80
1.57 ±1.28
3.23 ±2. 60
82.86 ±60.65
0.00 ±0.55
0.19±1.26
0.00 ±0.11
1.49 ±6. 82
0.89 ±0.42
0.00 ±26.73
0.00 ±0.77
0.00 ±46.40
3.93 ±1.37
0.00±0.16
37. 80 ±5.09
S6-2
0.00 ±3. 27
0.00 ±3. 54
0.00 ±1.30
0.00 ±1.52
0.24 ±0.80
0.00 ±0.87
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±9. 69
0.00 ±1.71
0.00±0.18
1410. 00 ±2790.59
0.00 ±17.76
0.00 ±37.37
0.00 ±1.87
0.00 ±22. 18
0.00±0.12
123.64 ±20. 21
21 .75 ±4.60
257.43 ±17. 05
19.39 ±23.88
235.07 ± 33.99
9.80 ±5. 03
0.00 ±2. 03
0.00 ±0.20
0.00±0.15
0.00±0.12
48.82 ±18.34
0.00 ±6. 60
106.21 ±429.18
8.09 ±2. 75
0.00 ±5. 38
482.76 ±53.06
0.00 ±0.12
35. 99 ±9.52
0.00 ±1.91
0.00 ±5. 38
0.00 ±0.61
0.00±5.18
8.98 ±1.73
0.12±0.92
0.00 ±2. 63
0.94 ±0.60
0.00 ±1.31
19. 18 ±7.05
0.00 ±4. 50
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±59.40
22. 10 ±5.63
92.98 ±52.87
0.00 ±29.41
0.00 ±2. 36
7.24±1.10
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.55
20.78 ± 1 .49
3.48 ± 1 .05
44. 52 ±102. 51
0.00 ±6. 70
0.00 ±2. 99
0.00 ±6.42
1 1 .27 ± 1 .68
79.24 ± 33.24
0.00 ±1.31
13. 39 ±2. 15
0.00 ±4. 13
0.29 ±0.50
2.96 ±2. 64
0.00 ±18.50
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.42
0.00±0.12
3.09 ±7. 77
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±18.50
1.37 ±0.90
0.00 ±38.04
1.85 ±0.77
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.99
S6-3
0.00 ±2.80
0.00 ±3.20
0.00±1.18
0.00 ±1.37
0.00 ±0.52
0.00 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±8.77
0.00 ±1.54
0.00±0.16
0.00 ± 2436.94
0.00 ±16. 01
0.00 ±33. 69
0.00 ±1.69
0.00 ±19. 99
0.00 ±0.11
61 .59 ±11. 35
0.00 ±2.97
83.46 ±7. 19
0.00 ±18. 15
60. 20 ±10.56
0.00 ±2.82
0.15±0.75
0.00 ±0.11
81.41 ±4.91
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4.75
0.00 ±5.95
0.00 ±368.21
0.64 ±1.59
0.00 ±4.60
325.41 ±35.84
0.00 ±0.11
12.18 ±5.95
0.00 ±1.72
0.00 ±4.79
0.00 ±0.55
0.00 ±4.63
19.98 ±3. 61
0.04 ±0.83
0.00 ±2.38
0.00 ±0.33
1.79 ±1.27
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4.06
2. 14 ±0.77
0.00 ±53.43
6.10±2.10
267.31 ±72.06
0.00 ±26. 26
1.97 ±4.64
0.56 ±0.80
0.00±0.12
7. 64 ±3.20
5. 66 ±0.42
0.11 ±0.59
1998.91 ±461.91
0.00 ±6.04
0.00 ±29. 16
3. 98 ±5.85
1.77 ±0.53
0.00 ±8.75
0.00±1.17
8. 52 ±1.20
0.00 ±3.57
0.11 ±0.34
0.00 ±1.00
0.00 ± 20.27
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±6.22
0.31 ±0.28
0.00 ±8.70
0.00 ±0.74
0.00 ± 32.97
5. 35 ±1.80
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.89
S6-4
0.00 ±2. 69
0.00 ±3. 08
0.00 ±1.11
0.00 ±1.34
0.00 ±0.50
0.00 ±0.71
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±8. 57
5.34 ±2. 28
0.46±0.19
0.00 ±2376. 85
0.00 ±15.64
0.00 ±38.56
89.17 ±13.86
0.00 ±19.53
0.00 ±1.30
32. 92 ±7.74
0.00 ±2. 90
52. 72 ±5.76
0.00 ±17.55
37. 06 ±7.74
0.00 ±2. 69
0.15±0.12
0.08 ±0.11
13. 82 ±0.86
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4. 23
18. 22 ±6.64
0.00 ±359.21
0.00 ±1.23
0.00 ±4.49
14. 55 ±1.61
1.57 ±0.52
8.82 ± 3.40
0.00 ±1.70
0.23 ±4. 76
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±4. 52
27. 29 ±4.86
0.49 ±0.85
0.00 ±2. 36
0.00 ±0.32
2.74 ±1.30
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±3. 96
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±52. 13
0.00 ±1.31
307.47 ±77.88
0.00 ±25.34
0.00 ±4. 67
1.11 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.11
3.28 ±1.74
1.87±0.17
0.00 ±0.56
11 99.92 ±291 .01
6.40±6.17
15. 13 ±18.39
0.00 ±5. 64
13.43 ±1.99
0.00 ±12.43
0.00±1.16
2.18±0.66
0.00 ±3.49
0.23 ± 0.37
0.00 ±1.36
0.00 ±22.34
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±6. 11
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±11. 98
0.00 ±0.71
0.00 ±33.31
0.23 ±0.30
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.87
S7-1
11. 66 ±4. 95
13.82 ±4. 84
6. 88 ±2.59
12.71 ±1.54
5.01 ±1.93
7. 17 ±4.22
1.68 ±0.63
17.84 ±4.65
1.02 ±1.32
0.89 ±0.25
140.70 ±1241. 59
25. 64 ±10.73
0.1 5 ±29.78
19.22 ±3. 05
12. 66 ±10.84
0.23±0.16
26.94 ±5.80
3.51 ±1.66
44.09 ±3. 71
38.40 ±15.54
31 .86 ±5. 75
5.16±2.03
0.16±0.12
0.00 ±0.09
4. 95 ±0.27
1.53 ±0.45
5.11 ±4.00
4.51 ±3.31
423.97 ±228. 70
1 .40 ± 0.94
0.00 ±4.22
10.79 ±0.95
0.23 ±0.11
5. 85 ±2.26
0.28 ±0.95
1.06 ±2.77
1.02 ±0.48
0.00 ±3.44
2. 70 ±0.56
0.50 ±0.74
5.51 ±1.75
0.29 ±0.34
0.64 ±1.01
0.11 ±0.09
0.00 ±3.91
0.59±0.19
0.00 ±34. 55
6.51 ±1.82
169.99 ±43.73
0.00 ±18. 86
3. 55 ±2.38
0.08 ±0.41
0.24 ±0.11
6.15±2.27
4. 25 ±0.31
0.59 ±0.56
12. 12 ±77.42
0.00 ±5.37
0.00 ±2.38
0.00 ±4.86
0.00 ±0.23
7. 23 ±9.35
0.00 ±1.03
30.1 3 ±3.50
0.00 ±2.87
0.32 ±0.37
2.97 ±1.92
7.69 ±19.44
0.00 ±0.34
0.46 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.08
0.27 ±3.33
0.21 ±0.17
4.15±7.66
2.49 ±0.84
0.00 ±19.41
1.62 ±0.46
0.26 ±0.43
0.44 ±0.51
B1-10
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
sandaracopimaric acid
nonadecanoic acid (c19)
isopimaric acid
palustric acid
dihydroisopimaric acid
8-abietic acid
dehydroabietic acid
8,14-abietenicacid
abietic acid
eicosanoic acid (c20)
levopimaric acid
heneicosanoic acid (c21)
7-oxodehydroabietic acid
docosanoic acid (c22)
tricosanoic acid (c23)
tetracosanoic acid (c24)
cholesterol
cholestanol
ergosterol
stigmasterol
sitosterol
Carbonvls (mo/mile)
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acetone
* acrolein
propionaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
Methacrolein
* n-butyraldehyde
benzaldehyde
glyoxal
valeraldehyde
tolualdehyde
hexanal
* acrolein converts to an unknown rear
1 ,3 butadiene (estimated)
C2 compounds
propene
propane
isoButane
1 Butene+iButylene
n-Butane
t-2-Butene
c-2-Butene
3-Me-1-Butene
isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Me-1-Butene
n-Pentane
t-2-Pentene
c-2-Pentene
2-Me-2-Butene
22DiMeButane
CycloPentene
CycloPentane
23DiMeButane
MTBE
2-MePentane
3-MePentane
2-Me-1-Pentene
1-Hexene
n-Hexane
t-2-Hexene
2-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Hexene
c-2-Hexene
t-3-Me-2-Pentene
MeCyPentane
2,4-DiMePentane
223TriMeButane
Benzene
CycloHexane
4MeHexene
2MeHexane
23DiMePentane
SMeHexane
S3-2
0.06±0.17
0.00 ±5.61
0.00 ±0.58
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±7.76
0.00 ±0.06
0.00±0.10
0.00 ±1.77
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±2.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±5.63
0.16±0.96
0.09 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.98
4. 24 ±7.01
0.00 ±0.06
0.00±2.17
0.00 ±0.06
5. 34 ±0.02
1.57 ±0.33
0.23 ±0.47
1.32 ±0.33
0.22 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.01
0.20 ±0.04
0.17±0.01
0.06 ±0.02
1.23 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
3.103 ±4.593
35. 193 ±8.665
22.963 ±4.854
1.002 ±0.057
1.835 ±0.1 18
13.928 ±1.641
3.190 ±0.307
2.644 ±0.417
0.911 ±0.059
51 .808 ±5.728
1.505 ±0.1 57
2. 510 ±0.316
9.431 ±0.956
0.082 ±0.024
2. 956 ±0.1 68
1 .630 ± 0.243
3. 287 ±0.307
3. 354 ±0.368
0.895 ±0.099
1.538 ±0.077
6. 330 ±0.640
0.032 ±0.003
22.209 ±2. 161
13.51 7 ±0.708
0.640 ±0.023
0.871 ±0.081
10.1 12 ±0.863
1.137 ±0.058
0.688 ±0.063
0.509 ±0.022
0.151 ±0.008
0.601 ±0.045
0.820 ±0.050
8.411 ±0.836
6. 193 ±0.318
0.219 ±0.020
42.626 ±4.949
<1 9.02 ±0.703
0.161 ±0.026
9.493 ±0.392
8. 163 ±0.288
<12.01 ±0.447
S4-1
0.02±0.17
0.02 ±5. 63
0.00 ±0.59
0.00 ±0.54
0.12±0.23
0.00 ±0.37
5.54 ±9. 01
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±1.78
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±2. 00
0.96±0.18
0.00 ±5. 60
0.00 ±0.94
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±1.04
0.10±7.01
0.07 ±0.06
0.00±2.17
0.00 ±0.06
7.35 ±0.02
1.32 ±0.32
0.44 ± 0.46
1.42 ±0.35
0.23 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.01
0.23 ±0.04
0.20 ±0.01
0.17±0.04
1.82 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.01
2.224 ±3. 292
30. 738 ±7.568
16.460 ±3.480
0.707 ±0.040
0.933 ±0.060
8.445 ±0.995
1.240±0.119
1.055 ±0.166
0.501 ±0.032
20. 025 ±2.214
0.989 ±0.103
1.404 ±0.176
3.994 ± 0.405
0.145 ±0.043
1.121 ±0.064
0.632 ±0.094
1.724 ±0.1 61
1.1 84 ±0.1 30
0.375 ±0.041
0.666 ±0.033
2.367 ±0.239
0.020 ±0.002
7.411 ±0.721
4.489 ±0.235
0.427 ±0.01 6
0.424 ±0.039
3.570 ±0.304
0.363 ±0.01 9
0.364 ±0.033
0.430 ±0.01 9
0.049 ±0.003
0.231 ±0.017
0.347 ±0.021
2.225 ±0.221
2.902 ±0.149
0.074 ±0.007
17.575 ±2.040
1.371 ±0.138
0.091 ±0.015
3.078 ±0.127
3.771 ±0.133
3.347 ±0.142
S4-2
0.00±0.16
3.44 ±5.57
0.42 ±0.72
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±7.87
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.09
0.42 ±1.76
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±1.99
0.10 ±0.14
0.00 ±5.53
0.17±0.95
0.33 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.99
0.00 ±6.92
0.00 ±0.05
0.00±2.15
0.00 ±0.05
1.78 ±0.01
0.60±0.19
0.15±0.28
0.20 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.06 ±0.02
0.05 ±0.01
0.04 ±0.02
0.46 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.01
0.617 ±0.914
12.634 ±3.1 11
4.568 ±0.966
0.522 ±0.029
0.321 ±0.021
2.461 ±0.290
0.431 ±0.041
0.902 ±0.142
0.153 ±0.010
7.433 ±0.822
0.284 ±0.030
0.482 ±0.061
2. 190 ±0.222
0.016 ±0.005
0.509 ±0.029
0.267 ±0.040
0.583 ±0.054
0.578 ±0.063
0.178 ±0.020
0.243 ±0.01 2
0.969 ±0.098
<3.41 ±0.353
<3.41 ±0.200
2. 053 ±0.1 07
0.108 ±0.004
0.182 ±0.017
1.504 ±0.128
0.174 ±0.009
0.124 ±0.012
0.102 ±0.005
0.026 ±0.001
0.093 ±0.007
0.142 ±0.009
1.187±0.118
0.821 ±0.042
0.037 ±0.004
5. 523 ±0.641
0.957 ±0.096
0.032 ±0.005
1.357 ±0.056
1.180 ±0.042
1 .488 ± 0.063
S5-1
7.56 ±0.62
0.00 ±9. 95
0.88 ±1.20
1.02 ±0.60
2.16±0.32
2.06 ±1.20
14.68 ±14.89
0.00 ±0.11
2.12±0.31
7.23 ±1.87
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 66
0.00 ±0.25
7.38 ±9. 53
0.98 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.89
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±7. 95
0.00±0.10
28. 84 ±3.25
0.00±0.10
42. 00 ±0.06
13. 13 ±0.99
1.68 ±1.41
12. 28 ±3.07
1 .47 ± 0.04
0.10±0.01
0.93 ±0.11
2.02 ±0.01
2.81 ±0.70
12. 82 ±0.02
0.14±0.01
0.27 ±0.02
1.43 ±0.03
1.43 ±0.02
28.865 ±42.720
378.91 7 ±93. 293
213.598±45.153
5. 184 ±0.294
7.941 ±0.511
99.645 ± 1 1 .737
13. 130 ±1.262
10. 659 ±1.682
4.928 ±0.31 9
159.605 ±17. 645
7.082 ±0.739
14.981 ±1.885
59.544 ± 6.036
0.000 ±0.000
15.037 ±0.854
7.855 ±1.1 69
15.343 ±1.432
15.629 ±1.714
4.457 ± 0.490
5.711 ±0.286
27. 045 ±2.734
0.392 ±0.033
86. 138 ±8.381
59.050 ± 3.093
6.043 ±0.221
5.510±0.512
64. 51 5 ±5.503
5.255 ±0.267
3.223 ±0.295
4.735 ±0.206
0.607 ±0.033
3. 135 ±0.234
3.631 ±0.222
35.903 ± 3.567
24. 946 ±1.280
1.023 ±0.092
278.974 ±32.390
10.971 ± 1.101
0.922 ±0.150
50. 204 ±2.071
39. 657 ±1.398
56.429 ± 2.400
S5-2
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±10.07
0.00 ±0.97
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.44
0.00 ±9. 62
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.77
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 65
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±8. 79
0.00 ±0.74
0.00 ±0.90
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±8. 05
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 50
0.00 ±0.11
49. 80 ±0.06
11. 35 ±0.96
1.23 ±1.37
12. 18 ±3.05
1.95 ±0.04
0.73 ±0.01
0.99 ±0.11
2.19±0.01
1.14 ±0.29
14. 83 ±0.02
0.19±0.01
0.24 ±0.02
0.52 ±0.03
0.52 ±0.02
29.506 ±43.669
1374.654 ±40.482
21 8.347 ±38. 387
4.733 ±0.268
5.448 ±0.351
95.722 ±11. 275
11. 399 ±1.095
9.612±1.517
4.292 ±0.277
118.924±13.148
4.435 ± 0.463
13.281 ±1.671
46. 922 ±4.756
0.000 ±0.000
1 1 .496 ± 0.652
6.327 ±0.942
12.909 ±1.205
9.430 ± 1 .034
3.857 ± 0.424
4. 180 ±0.209
21.600±2.183
0.352 ±0.030
69.802 ± 6.791
48.969 ± 2.565
6.673 ±0.244
4. 122 ±0.383
52. 163 ±4.449
4. 174 ±0.21 2
2.794 ±0.255
4.086 ±0.178
0.500 ±0.027
2.659 ±0.198
3.078 ±0.189
29.788 ± 2.959
21 .329 ±1.094
0.734 ±0.066
249.491 ±18.015
7.993 ±0.802
0.875 ±0.143
43. 268 ±1.785
37. 114 ±1.308
49.001 ± 2.084
S5-3
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±10.48
0.00 ±1.01
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±9. 32
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.84
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 76
0.00 ±0.27
0.00±9.15
0.00 ±0.77
0.00 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±8. 38
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 60
0.00 ±0.11
22. 25 ±0.06
5.83 ±0.99
3.57 ±1.41
3.74 ±0.93
1.32 ±0.04
0.27 ±0.01
0.75 ±0.11
0.89 ±0.01
1.36 ±0.34
5.24 ±0.02
0.05 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.02
0.38 ±0.03
0.38 ±0.02
11. 245 ±16.642
130.464±32.121
83.212 ±17.590
2.517±0.142
8.889 ±0.572
42. 974 ±5.062
6.31 9 ±0.607
4.201 ±0.663
2.443 ±0.158
72.934 ± 8.063
2. 156 ±0.225
2.795 ±0.352
21 .775 ±2.207
0.225 ±0.067
2.609 ±0.148
1.107±0.165
0.51 8 ±0.048
6.249 ±0.685
0.71 2 ±0.078
2.107±0.105
18.445 ±1.865
1.249 ±0.106
28.433 ± 2.766
21.640±1.133
0.592 ±0.021
1.828 ±0.170
19.294 ±1.646
1.1 65 ±0.059
0.335 ±0.031
0.408 ±0.01 8
0.205 ±0.011
0.543 ±0.040
0.411 ±0.025
7.898 ±0.785
26. 163 ±1.342
0.565 ±0.051
83.359 ± 9.678
<26.11 ±0.122
0.1 87 ±0.030
18. 695 ±0.771
30. 245 ±1.066
<24.89 ± 0.926
S5-4
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±11. 53
0.00 ±1.11
0.00 ±0.68
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±10.24
0.00±0.12
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±2. 03
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±3. 03
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±10.06
0.00 ±0.84
0.00 ±1.03
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±9. 22
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±2. 86
0.00±0.12
31.71 ±0.06
11. 29 ±0.98
0.81 ±1.40
0.53±0.13
1.99 ±0.04
1.43 ±0.01
1.09 ±0.11
1.82 ±0.01
4.29 ±1.07
13. 64 ±0.02
0.17±0.01
0.30 ±0.02
1.10±0.03
1.10±0.02
1 .489 ±2.203
103.973 ±25. 599
11. 01 7 ±2.329
0.1 33 ±0.007
0.995 ±0.064
4.836 ±0.570
1.686 ±0.162
0.892 ±0.141
0.441 ±0.028
26. 188 ±2.895
0.743 ±0.078
1.663 ±0.209
8.325 ± 0.844
0.000 ±0.000
1.950 ±0.1 11
1.079 ±0.1 60
2.402 ± 0.224
3.065 ±0.336
0.71 7 ±0.079
1 .406 ±0.070
4.568 ±0.462
1.025 ±0.086
14. 947 ±1.454
10. 81 2 ±0.566
1.520 ±0.056
0.641 ±0.060
9.387 ±0.801
0.714 ±0.036
0.351 ±0.032
0.238 ±0.010
0.203 ±0.011
0.543 ± 0.040
0.563 ±0.034
6.948 ±0.690
3.884 ±0.1 99
0.000 ±0.000
26. 165 ±3. 038
<14.34± 0.202
0.346 ±0.056
8.994 ±0.371
5.506 ±0.1 94
<1 2.33 ±0.459
S5-5
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±11. 33
0.00 ±1.09
0.00 ±0.67
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±10. 07
0.00±0.12
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±1.99
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±2.98
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±9.89
0.00 ±0.83
0.00 ±1.01
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±9.06
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±2.81
0.00±0.12
18.86 ±0.06
10.68 ±0.96
0.29 ±1.37
0.80 ±0.20
0.34 ±0.04
0.25 ±0.01
0.12±0.11
1.07 ±0.01
3. 32 ±0.83
6. 90 ±0.02
0.01 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.02
1.08 ±0.03
1.08 ±0.02
0.091 ±0.134
2.981 ±0.734
0.671 ±0.142
0.086 ±0.005
0.199 ±0.013
0.433 ±0.051
0.069 ±0.007
0.038 ±0.006
0.017 ±0.001
1.170 ±0.129
0.016 ±0.002
0.040 ±0.005
0.220 ±0.022
0.033 ±0.010
0.025 ±0.001
0.014 ±0.002
0.058 ±0.006
0.056 ± 0.006
0.007 ±0.001
0.021 ±0.001
0.144 ±0.014
0.000 ±0.000
0.243 ± 0.024
0.162 ±0.009
0.006 ±0.000
0.008 ±0.001
0.140 ±0.012
0.007 ±0.000
0.007 ±0.001
0.007 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.000
0.007 ±0.001
0.067 ±0.007
0.160 ±0.008
0.005 ±0.001
0.676 ±0.078
0.021 ±0.002
0.003 ±0.001
0.123 ±0.005
0.226 ±0.008
0.146 ±0.006
S6-1
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±10.44
0.00 ±1.00
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.27
0.81 ±0.83
1.86 ±11. 87
0.00 ±0.11
0.00±0.15
0.00 ±1.83
0.00 ±0.11
4.72 ±3. 34
5.49 ±0.86
2.94 ±9. 52
1.89 ±1.11
0.00 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±8. 34
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 59
0.00 ±0.11
38.71 ±0.06
8.95 ±0.98
0.83 ±1.39
7.05 ±1.76
1.20 ±0.04
0.83 ±0.01
0.63 ±0.11
1.39 ±0.01
0.76±0.19
6.85 ±0.02
0.15±0.01
0.23 ±0.02
0.76 ±0.03
0.76 ±0.02
24.624 ± 36.444
41 7.284 ±102.739
182.218±38.519
3.960 ±0.224
5.710 ±0.368
95.344 ± 1 1 .230
11.738±1.128
9.353 ± 1 .476
4.987 ±0.322
109.041 ±12.055
8. 187 ±0.855
12. 91 5 ±1.625
21 .808 ±2.210
0.000 ±0.000
8.972 ±0.509
5.264 ±0.783
10.959 ±1.023
8.384 ±0.920
3.51 2 ±0.386
5.029 ±0.252
16. 71 7 ±1.690
0.379 ±0.032
57.891 ± 5.632
33.91 2 ±1.776
2.524 ±0.092
6.681 ±0.621
25. 123 ±2.143
2.987 ±0.1 52
2.273 ±0.208
3.411 ±0.148
0.455 ±0.025
1.943 ±0.145
2.310±0.141
18.275 ±1.816
20.258 ±1.039
0.748 ±0.067
108.019 ±12. 541
7. 179 ±0.720
0.961 ±0.157
21 .01 3 ±0.867
25.755 ± 0.908
22.361 ±0.951
S6-2
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±11. 51
0.00 ±1.11
1.24 ±0.69
1.15±0.32
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±11. 55
0.00±0.12
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±2. 02
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±3. 03
5.68 ±0.91
0.00 ±10. 13
1.78±1.18
0.00 ±1.03
0.00 ±0.28
1.81 ±9.23
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±2. 86
0.00±0.12
7.07 ±0.06
0.32 ±0.99
0.00 ±1.42
2.24 ±0.56
0.20 ±0.04
0.13±0.01
0.13±0.11
0.23 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.02
2.02 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.02
0.20 ±0.03
0.20 ±0.02
10. 183 ±15.070
786.758 ± 34.589
75.352 ±15.929
2.749 ±0.156
5.453 ±0.351
39. 072 ±4.602
6.141 ±0.590
7.590 ±1.198
2.099 ±0.136
106.762 ±11. 803
6.851 ±0.715
7.526 ±0.947
34.61 2 ±3.508
0.009 ±0.002
7.540 ± 0.428
4.074 ±0.606
10.800 ±1.008
12.510 ±1.372
2.103±0.231
3.936 ±0.197
18. 954 ±1.91 6
0.168±0.014
59.864 ± 5.824
41. 147 ±2.155
3.052±0.111
1.749 ±0.163
39.867 ±3.400
3.070 ±0.156
2.808 ±0.257
3.051 ±0.133
0.376 ±0.020
1.960 ±0.146
2.983 ±0.183
23.207 ± 2.306
17.622 ±0.904
0.787 ±0.071
150.037 ±15. 096
6.402 ± 0.642
0.478 ±0.078
35.067 ± 1 .447
29.552 ±1.041
39.71 6 ±1.689
S6-3
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±10. 38
0.00 ±1.00
0.00 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±9.29
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.82
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.73
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±9.06
0.00 ±0.76
0.00 ±1.11
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±8.30
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.58
0.00 ±0.11
15.61 ±0.06
4.13±0.99
0.00 ±1.42
5. 54 ±1.39
0.67 ±0.04
0.39 ±0.01
0.41 ±0.11
0.97 ±0.01
0.61 ±0.15
4. 79 ±0.02
0.08 ±0.01
0.08 ±0.02
0.20 ±0.03
0.20 ±0.02
11.914±17.633
165.363 ±40.714
88. 164 ±18.637
3.090 ±0.1 75
2.878 ±0.1 85
54.053 ±6.367
6.625 ±0.637
5. 142 ±0.811
2.474 ±0.1 60
56.022 ±6. 194
2. 845 ±0.297
6.466 ±0.81 3
21.166±2.146
3.174 ±0.941
4.473 ± 0.254
2.435 ±0.362
8. 164 ±0.762
6. 287 ±0.690
1.327 ±0.146
2.231 ±0.111
11.125±1.125
0.170 ±0.014
31 .995 ±3.1 13
22.371 ±1.172
0.955 ±0.035
2.671 ±0.248
24. 180 ±2.062
1 .437 ± 0.073
1.410 ±0.129
1.637 ±0.071
0.174 ±0.009
0.936 ±0.070
1.310 ±0.080
12. 157 ±1.208
14.119±0.724
0.391 ±0.035
65.892 ±7.650
3.475 ± 0.348
0.400 ±0.065
18.083 ±0.746
24.893 ±0.877
20.857 ±0.887
S6-4
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±10. 12
0.00 ±0.98
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±9. 06
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.78
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 66
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ± 8.87
0.00 ±0.74
0.00 ±1.88
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±8. 09
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 51
0.00 ±0.11
9.71 ±0.06
2.82 ±0.96
0.00 ±1.37
2.74 ±0.69
0.55 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.01
0.36 ±0.11
0.42 ±0.01
0.23 ±0.06
3.22 ±0.02
0.05 ±0.01
0.14 ±0.02
0.05 ±0.03
0.05 ±0.02
4.173±6.176
33. 652 ±8.285
30. 880 ±6.528
1.276 ±0.072
3.029 ±0.195
19.498 ±2.297
3.659 ±0.352
2.372 ±0.374
1 .334 ±0.086
57. 642 ±6.373
2.120±0.221
3.340 ± 0.420
10.995 ±1.114
0.059 ±0.01 7
3.681 ±0.209
2.158±0.321
2.51 2 ±0.235
3.465 ±0.380
1.036 ±0.1 14
2.297±0.115
10.178±1.029
0.706 ±0.060
35.353 ± 3.440
21.660±1.135
0.794 ±0.029
1.517±0.141
16. 252 ±1.386
1.630 ±0.083
0.704 ±0.064
0.522 ±0.023
0.1 55 ±0.008
0.991 ±0.074
0.271 ±0.017
10. 006 ±0.994
13. 602 ±0.698
0.477 ± 0.043
46.570 ± 5.407
<24.50 ± 0.769
0.458 ±0.075
13. 036 ±0.538
17. 972 ±0.633
<1 6.84 ±0.626
S7-1
0.32±0.18
0.27 ±5.59
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.53
0.37 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.42
2.31 ±8.15
0.00 ±0.08
0.12±0.12
0.19±1.76
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±1.99
2. 56 ±0.30
0.00 ±5.61
0.85 ±1.01
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±1.09
0.00 ±6.95
0.00 ±0.08
0.00±2.16
0.00 ±0.08
5. 27 ±0.03
3.16±0.49
0.00 ±0.69
1.82 ±0.45
0.18±0.02
0.14 ±0.02
0.16±0.06
0.20 ±0.01
0.10±0.03
2. 08 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.01
3. 652 ±5.405
78. 880 ±19.421
27.025 ±5.71 3
1.098 ±0.062
1 .466 ± 0.094
13. 150 ±1.549
1.973 ±0.1 90
1 .575 ± 0.249
0.617 ±0.040
25.060 ±2.770
1.405 ±0.147
1.531 ±0.193
7. 063 ±0.71 6
0.000 ±0.000
1.310 ±0.074
0.767 ±0.1 14
1.528 ±0.143
3. 120 ±0.342
0.466 ± 0.051
0.748 ±0.038
3. 846 ±0.389
0.045 ± 0.004
11. 928 ±1.1 61
8.041 ±0.421
0.400 ±0.01 5
0.899 ±0.084
6. 817 ±0.581
0.500 ±0.025
0.310 ±0.028
0.454 ±0.020
0.065 ±0.004
0.313 ±0.023
0.334 ±0.020
4.486 ± 0.446
3.141 ±0.161
0.160 ±0.014
36.842 ±4.278
1.283 ±0.1 29
0.135 ±0.022
6. 808 ±0.281
4. 733 ±0.1 67
7. 695 ±0.327
B1-11
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Cyclohexene
SEtPentane
* 1-Heptene
* 224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
2MeHeptane
4MeHeptane
SMeHeptane
Hexanal
225TMHexane
Octene-1
1 1 DMeCyHexane
n-Octane
24DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
33DiMeHeptane
EtBenzene
m/p-xylene
2MeOctane
SMeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
n-Nonane
iPropBenzene
IPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
nPropBenzene
mEtToluene
pEtToluene
135TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
Octanal
beta-pinene
* 124TriMeBenzene
* n-Decane
iButBenzene
sButBenzene
Limonene
Indan
13diethylbenzene
14diethylbenzene
12diethylbenzene
2-propylToluene
3-ipropyltoluene
4-ipropyitoluene
2-ipropyltoluene
Nonanal
n-Undecane
1245tetraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1234tetraMeBenzene
n-Dodecane
S3-2
0.000 ±0.298
2. 665 ±0.030
0.599 ±2.01 5
16.501 ±0.015
0.403 ±0.229
6. 846 ±0.012
0.127 ±0.222
3. 21 3 ±0.305
2. 609 ±0.1 94
4. 548 ±0.1 53
4. 123 ±3.029
71 .522 ±0.201
2.250 ±0.239
4.804 ±0.171
1.793 ±0.1 73
5. 215 ±0.018
0.030 ±0.006
2.091 ±0.020
0.166 ±0.003
0.120 ±0.151
3. 955 ±0.064
0.718 ±0.032
1.922 ±0.01 5
0.111 ±1.481
21 .864 ±4. 155
66.910 ±0.021
0.935 ±0.320
3. 032 ±0.026
0.339 ± 1 .328
27. 158 ±0.006
0.136 ±0.079
2. 925 ±0.1 25
2.543 ± 0.044
0.371 ±0.032
0.296 ± 0.494
1 .487 ± 0.500
7.473 ± 0.745
25.371 ±0.427
10.635 ±0.549
12.805 ±0.404
9.288 ±0.1 51
0.372 ±0.01 8
0.265 ±1.858
41 .098 ±0.266
2. 749 ±0.057
1.164 ±0.046
0.823 ±1.21 8
<1 1.74 ±0.1 85
<4.15 ±0.443
4.430 ±0.1 56
2. 218 ±0.202
1.597 ±0.1 66
3.921 ±0.129
1.687 ±0.083
0.025 ±0.007
<4. 15 ±0.846
14.313±2.329
2.529 ±0.298
5. 795 ±0.400
7.465 ±0.1 37
2. 056 ±0.367
1.535 ±0.1 84
S4-1
0.21 2 ±0.037
0.335 ±0.000
<8.59± 0.000
<8.59± 0.003
0.073 ±0.077
2.287 ±0.003
0.036 ±0.066
0.951 ±0.123
1.052 ±0.058
1.365 ±0.070
1 .881 ± 1 .240
29. 282 ±0.051
0.576 ±0.063
1 .274 ±0.069
0.725 ±0.052
1.580 ±0.025
0.050 ±0.006
1.1 04 ±0.01 2
0.1 00 ±0.005
0.221 ±0.048
1.239 ±0.01 5
0.1 69 ±0.008
0.498 ±0.030
0.224 ±0.383
5.657 ±0.768
12. 374 ±0.023
1.022 ±0.108
1.022 ±0.01 8
0.227 ±0.236
4.833 ±0.050
1.091 ±0.018
0.665 ±0.01 9
0.377 ±0.003
0.029 ±0.025
0.233 ±0.026
0.077 ±0.068
1.017 ±0.100
3.397 ±0.063
1.566 ±0.053
1 .244 ±0.056
1.275 ±0.028
0.069 ±0.002
0.026 ±0.177
<3.92 ± 0.404
<3.92± 0.004
0.077 ±0.005
0.087 ±0.053
0.51 6 ±0.002
0.264 ±0.089
0.893 ±0.031
0.081 ±0.007
0.118±0.012
0.1 39 ±0.005
0.1 57 ±0.008
0.01 7 ±0.005
0.039 ±0.008
0.129±0.021
0.303 ±0.036
0.193±0.013
0.235 ±0.004
0.288 ±0.051
1.190±0.143
S4-2
0.070 ±0.042
0.378 ±0.01 5
0.301 ±0.232
1.901 ±0.002
0.045 ±0.037
1.100 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.030
0.438 ± 0.044
0.379 ±0.023
0.546 ±0.026
0.687 ±0.51 8
<1 2.23 ±1.1 84
<1 2.23 ±0.037
0.749 ±0.031
0.322 ±0.028
0.848 ±0.006
0.080 ±0.01 3
0.366 ±0.005
0.037 ±0.004
0.140 ±0.026
0.686 ±0.008
0.089 ±0.004
0.205 ±0.002
0.01 9 ±0.220
3. 240 ±0.563
9. 060 ±0.01 2
0.546 ±0.053
0.503 ±0.01 6
0.209 ±0.1 70
3.482 ±0.001
0.030 ±0.011
0.407 ±0.009
0.181 ±0.005
0.040 ±0.014
0.129 ±0.018
0.053 ±0.051
0.766 ±0.094
3. 213 ±0.061
1.512 ±0.061
1.413 ±0.051
1.172 ±0.004
0.010 ±0.004
0.055 ±0.203
4.501 ±0.032
0.330 ±0.004
0.086 ±0.006
0.109 ±0.112
1.083 ±0.000
0.499 ±0.037
0.368 ±0.01 3
0.275 ±0.025
0.233 ±0.024
0.321 ±0.011
0.172 ±0.008
0.084 ±0.026
0.049 ±0.010
1.054 ±0.1 72
0.227 ±0.027
0.423 ±0.029
0.582 ±0.011
0.599 ±0.1 07
1.765 ±0.211
S5-1
1.807 ±0.541
4.830 ±0.000
<82.54 ± 0.000
<82.54 ± 0.039
1 .073 ± 1 .285
38.403 ±0.124
1.277 ±0.860
12.440 ±1.479
12.671 ±0.713
16. 764 ±0.797
21 .516 ±17.977
461. 040 ±0.820
9. 197 ±0.698
14.058 ±1.102
11. 575 ±0.772
23.241 ±0.386
1.430 ±0.01 7
13.291 ±0.104
0.859 ±0.080
3.349 ±0.644
16. 806 ±0.197
2.225±0.113
6.729 ±0.301
2.270 ±6.254
92.306 ±16. 192
260.755 ±0.31 9
14. 063 ±1.755
16. 633 ±0.21 7
2.773 ±4. 624
94. 593 ±0.190
4. 172 ±0.222
8. 167 ±0.234
4.783 ±0.031
0.259 ±0.281
2.589 ±0.211
0.634 ±1.1 17
16.673 ±1.974
67. 264 ±1.314
32.764 ± 1 .335
31. 163 ±0.969
22. 31 2 ±0.354
0.870 ±0.011
0.1 69 ±3. 906
<86.37 ± 8.887
<86.37 ± 0.069
1 .406 ± 0.096
1.726 ±1.01 7
9.805 ±0.267
5.559±2.116
21. 159 ±0.747
1.294±0.118
1.510±0.156
3.102±0.102
2.296 ±0.1 13
0.589 ±0.1 79
0.489 ±0.097
13.114±2.134
4.926 ±0.579
5.220 ±0.360
6.437±0.118
7.411 ±1.322
19. 107 ±2.290
S5-2
0.441 ± 0.694
6. 189 ±0.000
<68.19±0.000
<68.19±0.027
0.746 ±1.1 68
34.881 ±0.123
1.270 ±0.973
14.070 ±1.208
10.348 ±0.585
13. 753 ±0.692
18.691 ±8.676
421. 067 ±0.827
9.271 ±0.054
1.080 ±0.773
8. 114 ±0.699
21 .048 ±0.322
0.520 ±0.01 6
12. 254 ±0.134
1.1 08 ±0.068
2.855 ±0.576
15. 040 ±0.158
1.789 ±0.102
6.083 ± 0.044
0.332 ± 5.442
80.326 ±11. 610
208.559 ±0.267
11.800±1.155
10.950 ±0.242
3.092 ±3. 881
79. 388 ±0.196
4.315±0.189
6.980 ±0.230
4.692 ±0.056
0.464 ± 0.300
2.768 ±0.290
0.875 ± 1 .463
21 .846 ±1.986
67.641 ±1.300
32.424 ±1.322
30. 857 ±0.978
22.504 ± 0.466
1.146±0.018
0.276 ±3. 993
<88.30 ± 9.085
<88.30 ± 0.085
1.736 ±0.1 10
1 .970 ± 1 .089
10. 510 ±0.277
5.873 ±2. 143
21 .428 ±0.756
1.091 ±0.099
0.563 ±0.058
3.384 ±0.1 11
2.682 ±0.1 32
0.673 ±0.205
0.789 ±0.1 57
13. 170 ±2.143
5.186±0.610
4.597 ±0.31 7
5.508 ±0.101
6.784 ±1.210
16.793 ±2.01 3
S5-3
0.000 ±0.395
3.525 ±0.011
0.231 ±27.565
225.782 ±0.01 8
0.498 ±0.528
15.775 ±0.051
0.530 ±0.1 35
1 .948 ± 2.894
24.791 ±1.390
32.686 ± 2.301
62.1 15 ±11. 568
273. 156 ±1.892
21 .203 ±0.376
7.566 ±0.382
4.008 ±0.295
8.868 ±0.024
0.380 ±0.01 7
23.794 ± 0.044
0.367 ±0.011
0.444 ±0.222
5.783±0.118
1.330 ±0.041
2.446 ± 0.000
0.000 ±2.600
38.373 ± 7.825
126.018 ±0.030
1.314 ±0.248
2.352 ±0.243
3.098 ±2. 207
45. 153 ±0.049
1.085 ±0.049
1.806 ±0.137
2.805 ±0.025
0.209 ±0.01 8
0.1 65 ±0.482
1 .452 ± 0.563
8.408 ±0.878
29. 914 ±0.517
12. 885 ±0.640
14.953 ±0.441
10.144 ±0.304
0.748 ±0.080
1.21 2 ±1.846
40.824 ± 0.239
2.472 ±0.055
1.1 28 ±0.041
0.743 ±0.81 8
<7.89± 0.000
<3.27± 0.437
4.374 ±0.154
0.743 ±0.068
1.094±0.113
3.103±0.102
1.1 07 ±0.055
0.041 ±0.013
<3.27± 0.667
5.167±0.841
0.758 ±0.089
1.273 ±0.088
1.399 ±0.026
0.314 ±0.056
0.1 34 ±0.01 6
S5-4
0.000 ±0.339
3.027 ±0.01 6
0.314 ±1.504
12.31 9 ±0.026
0.705 ±0.282
8.426 ±0.059
0.611 ±0.222
3.208 ±0.1 53
1.312±0.125
2.943 ±0.120
3.236 ±2. 81 7
66. 514 ±0.182
2.047 ±0.233
4.686 ±0.211
2.213±0.161
4.841 ±0.110
1.100±0.017
1 .298 ± 0.034
0.276 ±0.021
0.868 ±0.160
4.181 ±0.051
0.579 ±0.020
1.1 95 ±0.000
0.000 ±1.237
18.262 ±3. 300
53. 136 ±0.010
0.450 ± 0.242
2.292 ±0.027
0.345 ±0.967
19.781 ±0.007
0.1 55 ±0.058
2. 140 ±0.073
1 .489 ± 0.027
0.221 ±0.010
0.094 ±0.220
0.662 ±0.383
5.724 ±0.536
18. 247 ±0.326
8.1 19 ±0.338
7.893 ±0.282
6.487 ±0.036
0.088 ±0.011
0.1 74 ±1.304
28.830 ±0.151
1.565 ±0.026
0.521 ±0.027
0.486 ±0.666
<6.42± 0.000
<3.75± 0.149
1.491 ±0.053
1.109±0.101
0.481 ±0.050
0.892 ±0.029
0.848 ± 0.042
0.000 ±0.000
<3.75± 0.765
3.354 ±0.546
0.466 ±0.055
0.750 ±0.052
1.031 ±0.019
0.377 ±0.067
0.228 ±0.027
S5-5
0.004 ±0.003
0.024 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.1 65
1.348 ±0.000
0.001 ±0.003
0.107 ±0.001
0.006 ± 0.002
0.023 ±0.01 3
0.1 16 ±0.008
0.182 ±0.015
0.417 ±0.062
1.458 ±0.01 5
0.164 ±0.002
0.046 ±0.002
0.021 ±0.002
0.054 ±0.001
1.080 ±0.01 6
0.01 3 ±0.023
0.189 ±0.000
0.003 ±0.002
0.040 ±0.005
0.060 ±0.000
0.018 ±0.001
0.003 ±0.011
0.168 ±0.028
0.457 ±0.000
0.011 ±0.002
0.01 8 ±0.003
0.038 ±0.010
0.197 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.001
0.016 ±0.001
0.017 ±0.001
0.004 ±0.001
0.009 ±0.004
0.01 2 ±0.002
0.032 ±0.003
0.095 ±0.001
0.035 ±0.002
0.045 ±0.002
0.038 ±0.004
0.009 ±0.000
0.002 ±0.006
0.133 ±0.002
0.020 ±0.000
0.007 ± 0.000
0.005 ± 0.000
0.003 ±0.001
0.008 ±0.010
0.019 ±0.001
0.025 ±0.002
0.005 ±0.001
0.020 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.001
0.005 ±0.001
0.019 ±0.003
0.013 ±0.002
0.006 ±0.001
0.008 ±0.000
0.004 ±0.001
0.008 ±0.001
S6-1
1.802 ±0.200
1.782 ±0.000
<59.44 ± 0.000
<59.44 ± 0.026
0.708 ± 0.484
14.473 ±0.088
0.910 ±0.471
6.81 6 ±0.874
7.491 ±0.411
9.659 ±0.490
13. 21 9 ±9.623
227.233 ± 0.404
4.534 ±0.443
8.919±0.541
5.678 ±0.382
11.493±0.184
0.760 ±0.01 7
7.705 ±0.21 8
1.791 ±0.044
1.837 ±0.31 2
8.159±0.107
1.209 ±0.063
3.744 ±0.1 93
1 .459 ± 3.646
53.817±6.715
108.137 ±0.166
7.321 ±0.809
7.670 ±0.189
2.41 3 ±2. 039
41.724±0.181
3.980 ±0.106
3.919±0.136
2.771 ±0.019
0.157±0.148
1.365 ±0.1 18
0.354 ± 0.584
8.71 8 ±0.902
30.721 ± 0.593
14. 779 ±0.455
10. 628 ±0.476
10.961 ±0.207
0.509 ±0.008
0.1 20 ±1.455
<32.17±3.309
<32.17±0.028
0.568 ±0.034
0.61 3 ±0.434
4.187±0.102
2.488 ±0.81 9
8. 185 ±0.289
0.389 ±0.035
1.150±0.119
1 .304 ± 0.043
1 .074 ± 0.053
0.308 ±0.094
0.1 72 ±0.034
4.866 ±0.792
2. 145 ±0.252
1.542 ±0.106
1.780 ±0.033
2.683 ±0.478
7. 137 ±0.855
S6-2
0.881 ±0.401
3.581 ±0.000
<51. 27 ±0.000
<51. 27 ±0.020
0.555 ±0.928
27.717 ±0.103
1.067 ±0.61 6
8.91 6 ±0.979
8.387 ±0.483
1 1 .354 ± 0.526
14. 197 ±6.499
191 .892 ±0.628
7.042 ± 0.406
8.169±0.710
7.460 ±0.560
16.851 ±0.272
0.200 ±0.01 7
1 1 .939 ± 0.049
0.405 ±0.046
1.91 9 ±0.503
13. 135 ±0.132
1 .497 ±0.080
4.761 ±0.036
0.275 ±3.289
48. 545 ±8.091
130.299 ±0.224
9.902 ±0.841
7.976 ±0.146
1 .867 ± 2.424
49. 596 ±0.1 39
3.061 ±0.162
5.950 ±0.157
3.205 ±0.01 7
0.140±0.186
1.721 ±0.139
0.41 7 ±0.684
10.221 ±0.965
32.874 ± 0.674
16. 806 ±0.628
14. 657 ±0.490
11. 273 ±0.221
0.544 ±0.009
0.141 ±2.019
<44.65 ± 4.594
<44.65 ± 0.036
0.728 ±0.038
0.682 ±0.525
5.066 ±0.137
2.171 ±0.847
8.465 ±0.299
0.629 ±0.057
0.497 ±0.052
1 .342 ±0.044
1.309 ±0.065
0.236 ±0.072
0.255 ±0.051
4.690 ±0.763
2.259 ±0.266
1.474 ±0.102
1 .837 ±0.034
2.278 ±0.406
4. 166 ±0.499
S6-3
0.690 ±0.1 28
1.145 ±0.000
<64.92± 0.000
<64.92± 0.010
0.263 ±0.482
14.385 ±0.040
0.41 6 ±0.296
4. 272 ±0.768
6.579 ±0.389
9. 155 ±0.601
16.227 ±4.607
11 0.906 ±0.558
6.253 ±0.299
6. 027 ±0.41 8
4. 389 ±0.303
9. 107 ±0.153
0.200 ±0.01 7
7. 007 ±0.059
0.489 ±0.025
1.055 ±0.229
5. 984 ±0.080
0.904 ±0.041
2.441 ±0.119
0.899 ±1.587
23.428 ±3.059
49.263 ±0.1 00
4. 399 ±0.450
4.261 ±0.078
0.996 ±1.027
21.012±0.107
2. 348 ±0.066
2.445 ± 0.070
1.436 ±0.01 3
0.109±0.111
1 .021 ± 0.044
0.132 ±0.254
3. 802 ±0.366
12.453 ±0.268
6.676 ±0.1 96
4.578 ±0.229
5. 262 ±0.079
0.195 ±0.004
0.055 ±0.458
<10.13±1.042
<10.13±0.015
0.298 ±0.020
0.351 ±0.116
1.122 ±0.043
0.818 ±0.230
2. 299 ±0.081
0.274 ±0.025
0.627 ±0.065
0.466 ±0.01 5
0.521 ±0.026
0.094 ±0.029
0.166 ±0.033
0.849 ±0.1 38
0.523 ±0.061
0.321 ±0.022
0.292 ±0.005
0.309 ±0.055
3. 658 ±0.438
S6-4
0.000 ±0.431
3.847 ±0.050
1.01 3 ±4. 998
40.939 ± 0.022
0.591 ±0.348
10.396 ±0.045
0.461 ±0.281
4.067 ±0.570
4.887 ±0.359
8.447 ±0.361
9.743 ±4. 820
11 3.81 5 ±0.393
4.408 ±0.357
7. 192 ±0.259
2.723 ±0.262
7.895 ±0.032
0.050 ±0.01 7
4.034 ±0.046
0.376 ±0.006
0.237 ±0.211
5.497 ±0.109
1.228 ±0.042
2.51 5 ±0.006
0.043 ± 1 .401
20.678 ± 2.860
46.058 ± 0.026
1.155 ±0.343
3.250 ±0.021
0.270 ±0.81 5
16. 672 ±0.002
0.050 ±0.063
2.335 ±0.080
1.632 ±0.051
0.423 ±0.025
0.230 ±0.580
1.747 ±0.231
3.452 ±0.352
12. 006 ±0.200
4.981 ±0.221
5.157±0.174
4.006 ±0.052
0.127±0.016
0.244 ±0.580
12.821 ±0.118
1.221 ±0.021
0.420 ±0.01 8
0.332 ±0.299
<2.89± 0.000
<1. 76 ±0.101
1.009 ±0.036
0.460 ±0.042
0.340 ±0.035
0.531 ±0.017
0.61 7 ±0.030
0.000 ±0.000
<1. 76 ±0.358
1.614 ±0.262
0.358 ±0.042
0.442 ±0.030
0.555 ±0.010
0.1 53 ±0.027
0.252 ±0.030
S7-1
0.242 ± 0.074
0.663 ±0.000
<1 0.98 ±0.000
<1 0.98 ±0.004
0.091 ±0.180
5. 377 ±0.01 5
0.152 ±0.121
1.751 ±0.199
1.704 ±0.098
2. 294 ±0.105
2. 822 ±2.264
53.460 ±0.1 04
1.166±0.118
2. 377 ±0.131
1.372 ±0.1 15
3.451 ±0.056
0.050 ±0.008
2. 166 ±0.025
0.209 ±0.009
0.391 ±0.101
2. 653 ±0.028
0.320 ±0.01 5
0.892 ±0.054
0.405 ±0.790
1 1 .664 ± 1 .851
29.814 ±0.045
2. 003 ±0.1 72
1 .627 ± 0.034
0.429 ±0.573
11. 725 ±0.010
0.213 ±0.035
1.280 ±0.037
0.747 ±0.005
0.045 ±0.033
0.301 ±0.027
0.082 ±0.1 56
2. 333 ±0.233
7. 950 ±0.1 35
3. 365 ±0.147
3.439 ±0.1 28
2.947 ± 0.044
0.108 ±0.001
0.023 ± 0.447
<9. 89 ±1.01 7
<9.89± 0.007
0.151 ±0.008
0.142 ±0.103
0.993 ±0.035
0.546 ±0.21 7
2.171 ±0.077
0.108 ±0.010
0.194 ±0.020
0.326 ±0.011
0.300 ±0.01 5
0.01 5 ±0.005
0.068 ±0.014
0.188 ±0.031
0.432 ±0.051
0.555 ±0.038
0.740 ±0.014
0.713 ±0.127
2. 338 ±0.280
B1-12
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Gravimetric mass (mg/mi)
Carbon fractions by TOR (ma/mi)
Organic Carbon Fraction 1
Organic Carton Fraction 2
Organic Carton Fraction 3
Organic Carton Fraction 4
Pyrolyzed Organic Carton
Total Organic Carbon
Elemental Carton Fraction 1
Elemental Carton Fraction 2
Elemental Carton Fraction 3
Total Elemental Carton
Total Carbon
Elements by XRF tmg/mi)
Sodium (gualitative only)
Magnesium (qualitative only)
Aluminum
Silicon
Phosphorous
Sulfur
Chlorine
Potassium
Calcium
Titanium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Iron
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Arsenic
Selenium
Bromine
Rubidium
Strontium
Yttrium
Zirconium
Molybdenum
Palladium
Silver
Cadmium
Indium
Tin
Antimony
Barium
Lanthanum
Gold
Mercury
Thallium
Lead
Uranium
Anions by 1C (mo/mi)
Nitrate Ion
Sulfate Ion
Polvcvclic aromatic hydrocarbons (uo/mile)
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1-methylnaphthalene
Biphenyl
1+2ethylnaphthalene
2,6+2,7-dimethylnaphthalene
1,3+1, 6+1 ,7dimethylnaphth
1 ,4+1 ,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
1 ,2-dimethylnaphthalene
2-Methylbiphenyl
3-Methylbiphenyl
4-Methylbiphenyl
Dibenzofuran
A-trimethylnaphthalene
1-ethyl-2-methylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphthalene
C-trimethylnaphthalene
2-ethyl-1-methylnaphthalene
E-trimethylnaphthalene
F-trimethylnaphthalene
2,3,5+l-trimethylnaphthalene
S7-2
8.81 ±1.40
0.947 ±0.255
1.775 ±0.356
1.729 ±0.371
0.824 ±0.241
0.002 ±0.021
5. 258 ±0.989
0.725 ±0.242
1.060 ±0.1 85
0.027 ±0.01 3
1.808 ±0.351
7. 068 ±1.280
0.1742 ±0.1410
0.0211 ±0.0221
0.0140 ±0.0092
0.0405 ± 0.0078
0.0483 ±0.0081
0.3445 ± 0.0545
0.001 3 ±0.0049
0.01 19 ±0.0026
0.1255 ±0.0200
0.0044 ±0.01 07
0.0017 ±0.0048
0.0007 ±0.0010
0.0006 ±0.0006
0.0331 ±0.0054
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0007 ±0.0004
0.0041 ±0.0007
0.0640 ±0.01 05
0.0007 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.0010
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0005 ±0.0004
0.0002 ±0.0005
0.0003 ±0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0007
0.0003 ± 0.0008
0.0022 ±0.0011
0.0004 ±0.001 5
0.0012 ±0.0020
0.0014 ±0.0019
0.0014 ±0.0023
0.0034 ±0.0036
0.0021 ±0.0039
0.01 60 ±0.01 78
0.01 78 ±0.0244
0.0008 ±0.001 7
0.0004 ±0.0008
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.0019±0.0014
0.0002 ±0.001 2
0.02 ±0.01
0.89 ± 0.06
1723. 13 ±142. 99
8275.21 ± 656.79
4998.45 ± 346.88
21 1.58 ±13.62
813.98±69.18
1987.70 ±161 .21
3307.09 ±270.58
32.96 ±4. 27
709.87 ±77.35
0.00 ±133.97
146.55 ±39.98
51 .47 ±12.05
48.21 ±3.52
386.79 ±20.83
73.67 ±3. 62
246.40 ± 22.90
184.71 ±15.29
10.10 ±1.28
100.38 ±8.14
68.86 ± 5.44
59.01 ±8.74
S7-3
4.12±0.69
0.1 70 ±0.075
0.312±0.107
0.484 ±0.251
0.711 ±0.244
0.004 ±0.037
1.666 ±0.447
0.61 8 ±0.239
0.358 ±0.079
0.028 ±0.01 9
0.994 ±0.243
2.661 ±0.608
0.0481 ±0.2109
0.0040 ±0.0451
0.01 65 ±0.01 55
0.0753 ±0.01 38
0.0346 ±0.0070
0.0978 ±0.01 58
0.001 5 ±0.0081
0.0453 ±0.0079
0.1167±0.0189
0.01 15 ±0.0272
0.0037 ±0.01 17
0.0035 ±0.001 7
0.001 6 ±0.0010
0.1972±0.0313
0.001 6 ±0.0029
0.0021 ± 0.0007
0.0079 ±0.0014
0.0343 ± 0.0071
0.0001 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0018
0.0006 ±0.0007
0.0008 ±0.0007
0.0006 ±0.0009
0.0010 ±0.0009
0.0010 ±0.0011
0.0014±0.0013
0.0024 ±0.001 9
0.0000 ±0.0026
0.0006 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0005 ±0.0039
0.0000 ±0.0060
0.0020 ±0.0068
0.0000 ±0.0311
0.01 02 ±0.041 6
0.0003 ± 0.0029
0.0008 ±0.0015
0.0014 ±0.0013
0.0056 ± 0.0023
0.001 5 ±0.0023
0.01 ±0.03
0.32 ±0.05
1159.06±148.11
799.94 ± 65.47
361 .27 ±26.05
19. 59 ±4.64
41 .06 ±31 .98
93. 56 ±8. 12
139.03 ±12.12
39. 33 ±4.96
19. 56 ±2.36
0.00 ±395.06
0.00 ±112.66
0.00 ±34.81
9.81 ±0.83
24.43 ± 1 .69
4.76 ±1.06
15. 98 ±1.94
12.75 ±1.50
0.26 ±0.50
6.49 ± 1 .09
7.34 ±0.81
6.60 ±1.55
S7-1
4. 78 ±0.79
0.038 ±0.055
0.331 ±0.111
0.556 ±0.254
0.263 ±0.1 13
0.001 ±0.036
1.155 ±0.374
0.266 ±0.1 00
1 .248 ± 0.258
0.028 ±0.020
1.537 ±0.360
2. 680 ±0.598
0.1952 ±0.2134
0.0062 ±0.0377
0.0115 ±0.0152
0.0768 ±0.0141
0.0022 ±0.0069
0.5370 ±0.0850
0.001 3 ±0.01 07
0.0054 ± 0.0032
0.0489 ± 0.0084
0.0028 ±0.01 80
0.0009 ±0.0078
0.0017 ±0.0014
0.0004 ±0.0010
0.0424 ± 0.0070
0.0004 ±0.0010
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0040 ±0.0008
0.0223 ±0.0057
0.0002 ±0.001 8
0.0001 ±0.0016
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.001 6 ±0.0006
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0001 ±0.0012
0.0003 ±0.0013
0.0007 ±0.001 9
0.0004 ± 0.0026
0.0002 ± 0.0034
0.0004 ± 0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0039
0.0027 ±0.0062
0.001 5 ±0.0067
0.01 87 ±0.031 9
0.01 67 ±0.0411
0.0011 ±0.0022
0.0002 ±0.001 3
0.0002 ±0.001 2
0.001 6 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.02 ± 0.03
1.43±0.10
2596.81 ± 240.85
1970.31 ± 157.99
842.37 ±59.25
47.21 ±5.56
169.23 ±36. 11
105.94 ±9. 11
148.68 ±12.90
12.68±2.16
18.28 ±2. 24
0.00 ±401. 62
0.00 ±114.56
0.00 ±35. 38
15.52 ±1.22
20.10±1.51
5. 02 ±1.08
8. 58 ±1.41
8. 34 ±1.25
0.00 ±0.50
3. 65 ±0.99
4. 09 ±0.63
5. 12 ±1.41
S8-1
1.81 ±0.30
0.125±0.049
0.392 ±0.074
0.337 ±0.125
0.1 39 ±0.039
0.011 ±0.020
0.983 ±0.201
0.205 ±0.047
0.353 ±0.097
0.000 ±0.005
0.544 ±0.088
1.527 ±0.283
0.1 727 ±0.0971
0.0279 ±0.0140
0.01 50 ±0.0071
0.0454 ± 0.0078
0.0036 ±0.0023
0.0620 ±0.0099
0.0014 ±0.0023
0.0031 ±0.0014
0.0494 ± 0.0080
0.0058 ±0.0082
0.0024 ±0.0038
0.001 2 ±0.0008
0.0008 ±0.0004
0.0535 ±0.0085
0.0002 ±0.0006
0.0003 ± 0.0002
0.0023 ± 0.0005
0.0135 ±0.0029
0.0004 ± 0.0009
0.0005 ± 0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0003
0.0003 ± 0.0004
0.0000 ± 0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0003 ±0.0006
0.0003 ±0.0009
0.0002 ±0.001 2
0.0005 ±0.001 5
0.0010 ±0.001 5
0.0007 ±0.001 8
0.0011 ±0.0027
0.0028 ±0.0030
0.0032 ±0.0143
0.01 68 ±0.0189
0.0014 ±0.0010
0.0000 ± 0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0005 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.0009
0.02 ±0.01
0.15±0.01
590.90 ±52.89
1639.57 ±130.37
807.45 ±56.16
27.45 ± 2.03
149.54 ±14.37
175.73 ±14.39
286.93 ±23.69
2.31 ±0.60
26. 63 ±3.04
71.41 ±78.87
47.64 ±22.69
12. 99 ±6.92
8.22 ±0.62
22. 78 ±1.27
6.36 ±0.40
15.15±1.47
10.24 ±0.90
0.60 ±0.14
6.44 ± 0.58
3.26 ±0.30
6.37 ±1.01
S8-2
2. 08 ±0.34
0.267 ±0.061
0.579 ±0.1 09
0.489 ±0.1 32
0.158 ±0.044
0.001 ±0.016
1 .488 ± 0.284
0.183 ±0.047
0.716 ±0.129
0.010 ±0.007
0.906 ±0.1 74
2. 372 ±0.423
0.1412 ±0.1034
0.0102 ±0.0168
0.0098 ± 0.0075
0.0470 ±0.0081
0.0058 ±0.0023
0.0721 ±0.0115
0.0025 ±0.0026
0.0034 ±0.0015
0.0639 ±0.01 02
0.0051 ±0.0082
0.0022 ±0.0035
0.0013 ±0.0007
0.0008 ±0.0004
0.0311 ±0.0050
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0007 ±0.0003
0.0023 ±0.0005
0.0273 ±0.0048
0.0009 ±0.0008
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0004 ± 0.0006
0.001 3 ±0.0009
0.0003 ±0.001 2
0.0009 ±0.001 6
0.0014 ±0.0015
0.0013 ±0.0018
0.0020 ±0.0028
0.001 2 ±0.0030
0.0068 ±0.0145
0.0099 ±0.01 89
0.001 3 ±0.0011
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0005 ±0.0006
0.001 7 ±0.0010
0.0004 ±0.0009
0.01 ±0.01
0.15 ±0.01
703.59 ±61. 29
2456. 06 ±195.10
1243.07 ±86. 36
60.45 ±4. 02
179.99 ±16.75
273.93 ±22.33
429.62 ±35.33
3. 38 ±0.70
60.39 ±6. 71
30. 85 ±80.62
51 .33 ±23.35
16.34±7.12
15.24±1.13
50.94 ±2. 77
11. 68 ±0.63
31 .09 ±2.93
30.67 ±2.57
1.84 ±0.28
12.70 ±1.07
9. 56 ±0.78
13.90±2.10
S8-3
3.48 ±0.56
0.333 ±0.069
0.432 ±0.083
0.849 ±0.186
0.755 ±0.173
0.026 ±0.01 9
2.346 ±0.41 6
0.589 ±0.141
0.697 ±0.123
0.080 ±0.024
1 .339 ±0.248
3.685 ±0.628
0.1484±0.1059
0.0161 ±0.0159
0.01 07 ±0.0076
0.2111 ±0.0336
0.0131 ±0.0028
0.0863 ±0.01 37
0.0014 ±0.0026
0.0069 ±0.001 7
0.0738 ±0.01 18
0.0048 ±0.0081
0.0020 ±0.0036
0.0028 ±0.0008
0.001 5 ±0.0005
0.0985 ±0.0156
0.0006 ±0.0008
0.0014 ±0.0004
0.0063 ±0.0010
0.0392 ± 0.0065
0.0005 ± 0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0003 ± 0.0003
0.0004 ± 0.0003
0.0002 ± 0.0004
0.0002 ± 0.0004
0.0004 ±0.0005
0.0005 ±0.0006
0.0009 ±0.0008
0.0003 ±0.001 2
0.0009 ±0.001 5
0.0008 ±0.001 5
0.0004 ±0.001 8
0.0011 ±0.0027
0.001 5 ±0.0030
0.0092 ±0.0140
0.01 90 ±0.0184
0.0014 ±0.0011
0.0004 ± 0.0006
0.0000 ± 0.0005
0.0050 ±0.0012
0.0003 ± 0.0009
0.03 ±0.01
0.21 ±0.02
11 9.55 ±24 .43
690.36 ±55. 11
346.03 ±24. 17
15.19±1.37
52. 75 ±8.03
73. 23 ±6. 10
114.09 ±9.57
9. 14 ±1.34
1 1 .37 ± 1 .39
79.58 ±80.42
50.95 ±23. 14
18. 97 ±7.07
3.60 ±0.29
12.49 ±0.73
2.89 ±0.27
7.70 ±0.79
5.87 ±0.56
0.45 ±0.14
2.99 ±0.33
2.91 ±0.28
2.87 ±0.52
B1-13
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
J-trimethylnaphthalene
1 ,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Dibenzothiophene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
A-methyifluorene
1-methylfluorene
B-methylfluorene
9-fluorenone
Xanthone
Acenaphthenequinone
Perinaphthenone
2-methylanthracene
3-methylphenanthrene
2-methylphenanthrene
9-methyiphenanthrene
1-methylphenanthrene
Anthrone
Anthraquinone
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene
A-dimethylphenanthrene
B-dimethylphenanthrene
C-dimethylphenanthrene
D-dimethylphenanthrene
1 ,7-dimethylphenanthrene
E-dimethyiphenanthrene
9-methylanthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
9-Anthraaldehyde
Retene
Benzonaphthothiophene
1 +3-methylfluoranthene
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py
B-MePy/MeFI
C-MePy/MeFI
D-MePy/MeFI
4-methylpyrene
1-methylpyrene
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene
Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Triphenylene
Chrysene
Benzanthrone
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
3-methylchrysene
Benz(a)anthracene-7,1 2-dione
5+6-methylchrysene
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)fluoranthene
BeP
BaP
Perylene
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
Dibenzo(aj)anthracene
lndeno[1 23-cd]pyrene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Benzo(b)chrysene
Picene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Anthanthrene
Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Coronene
Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene
nitro-PAH (uq/milel
1-nitronaphthalene
2-nitronaphthalene
2-nitrobiphenyl
3-nitrobiphenyl
4-nitrobiphenyl
2-nitrofluorene
1 ,3-dinitronaphthalene
S7-2
33.03 ±2. 91
3.61 ±0.60
21 .68 ±1.28
88.99 ±6. 69
77.90 ±5.82
93.04 ±10.72
5. 03 ±0.55
160.88 ±5. 75
5.46 ±0.59
77.27 ±5.86
39.79 ±5. 14
3.77 ±0.71
5.94 ±0.63
0.71 ±0.37
2.94 ± 0.81
0.29 ± 0.29
96.58 ±17.81
43. 79 ±2.65
46.72 ±3. 84
26.56 ±4.42
20.18±3.17
1.18±0.41
0.17±0.14
7. 07 ±1.23
9. 90 ±2.07
4. 56 ±0.33
16.39 ±1.40
3.66 ±0.56
10.14±1.02
5.22 ±1.05
10. 09 ±2.40
24.94 ± 1 .48
29. 58 ±3.25
0.96 ± 0.25
0.01 ±0.10
0.18±0.15
2.51 ±0.79
3.30 ±0.39
3. 92 ±0.73
3. 23 ±0.35
2.44 ±0.15
2. 17 ±0.42
1.18 ±0.58
0.97 ±0.16
9.61 ±1.80
4. 12 ±0.89
3.89 ±0.70
3.59 ±0.57
3.20 ± 0.42
5.57 ± 0.57
0.14 ±0.10
1.17±0.19
3.53 ±0.23
0.35 ±0.21
7.43 ± 1 .44
0.53 ±0.19
3.25 ±0.42
4.18±0.89
0.93 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.91
0.04 ±0.08
0.71 ±0.11
3. 15 ±0.63
0.51 ±0.18
0.29 ±0.07
0.27 ±0.16
7.33 ±1.08
1 .00 ± 0.24
0.53 ± 0.35
0.43 ±0.13
2.60 ±0.47
0.02 ±0.07
0.0000 ±0.0043
0.0095 ±0.0075
0.0009 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0057
0.0285 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.1 334
S7-3
2.21 ±0.57
1.70 ±0.69
1.74 ±0.26
58. 84 ±4.42
6.49 ± 1 .58
25. 14 ±3.54
0.82 ±0.33
69. 16 ±3.11
17.63 ±1.83
6.21 ±0.84
6.02 ±1.00
1 .42 ± 0.39
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.49
0.87 ±0.43
0.50 ±0.81
3.06 ±0.64
7.39 ±0.57
9.29 ±0.95
4.41 ±0.86
3.98 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±2. 52
1 .69 ± 0.42
0.94 ±0.15
2.70 ±0.31
0.75±0.18
1 .99 ± 0.24
1.1 3 ±0.27
0.00 ± 0.44
30.32±2.17
43.68±5.17
0.00±0.13
0.01 ±0.18
0.09 ±0.26
0.38 ±0.20
0.89±0.17
1.62 ±0.43
0.96±0.18
0.91 ±0.18
0.69 ±0.24
0.20 ±0.46
0.26 ±0.15
22.65 ±4.62
11. 62 ±2.51
2.52 ±0.64
0.80 ±0.21
1.97 ±0.38
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.16
0.44 ±0.1 5
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
3. 82 ±3. 11
0.52 ±0.22
4.18±0.60
3.18±0.80
0.45 ±0.28
0.00 ±2. 68
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.48 ± 0.24
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
9.79 ±1.66
0.80 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.37
0.00±0.13
2.18±0.44
0.02±0.13
0.0033 ±0.01 70
0.0189 ±0.0220
0.0000 ±0.0077
0.01 25 ±0.01 05
0.091 2 ±0.0258
0.0000 ±0.0147
0.0000 ±0.3821
S7-1
0.46 ±0.53
1.95 ±0.72
1.16±0.25
54.59 ±4. 12
3. 59 ±1.52
4. 18 ±1.87
1.18 ±0.35
57.44 ± 2.80
3.21 ±0.46
5.31 ±0.81
6.47 ± 1 .06
1.39 ±0.38
0.48 ±0.33
0.57 ±0.67
0.26 ± 0.32
0.77 ± 0.85
3.23 ± 0.67
5.89 ±0.50
7. 75 ±0.84
2. 60 ±0.59
2. 86 ±0.63
0.47 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.29
6. 60 ±2.75
1.07 ±0.30
0.71 ±0.14
1 .56 ± 0.24
0.50 ±0.16
1.08 ±0.18
0.62 ±0.19
0.02 ± 0.45
15. 56 ±1.65
13. 04 ±2.54
13. 59 ±2.88
0.02 ±0.18
0.19±0.27
0.72 ±0.28
0.76±0.16
0.62 ±0.33
0.48±0.16
0.19 ±0.17
0.52 ±0.22
0.86 ±0.66
0.56 ±0.16
5.48 ±3. 15
0.89 ±0.42
1.82 ±0.56
0.82 ±0.21
1.27 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.13
0.01 ±0.17
0.30 ±0.14
0.00±0.13
0.12±0.19
7.96 ±3. 33
0.10±0.15
1.86 ±0.38
2. 03 ±0.63
0.35 ±0.26
10.81 ±3.72
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
5.65 ±1.30
0.28 ±0.16
0.00 ± 0.26
0.00 ±0.13
1.89 ±0.40
0.00±0.13
0.1199±0.0190
0.071 8 ±0.0238
0.0000 ±0.0078
0.0000 ±0.0075
0.0000 ± 0.0255
0.0000 ±0.0149
0.0000 ±0.3882
S8-1
1.58±0.19
0.17±0.14
1.41 ±0.11
11. 26 ±0.97
7.02 ±0.67
3.29 ±0.56
1.44 ±0.18
22.06 ± 0.88
0.21 ±0.07
3.44 ± 0.32
3.44 ± 0.49
0.65±0.15
1.96 ±0.23
0.08±0.13
0.96 ±0.28
0.18±0.17
1.96 ±0.39
2. 70 ±0.20
3.11 ±0.30
1.42 ±0.27
1.43 ±0.26
0.23 ±0.11
0.16±0.09
0.90 ±0.53
0.36±0.11
0.28 ±0.05
0.94 ±0.11
0.24 ±0.06
0.48 ±0.07
0.30 ±0.08
0.76 ±0.22
2.16±0.32
1.73 ±0.46
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.09
0.05 ±0.05
0.03 ±0.04
0.12±0.08
0.10±0.05
0.13±0.05
0.08 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.08
0.08 ±0.05
0.55 ±0.59
0.00 ±0.07
0.11 ±0.14
0.10±0.05
0.11 ±0.07
0.21 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.02 ±0.04
0.11 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.16 ±0.60
0.01 ±0.04
0.08 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.14
0.03 ±0.05
0.49 ±0.56
0.04 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.22 ±0.08
0.04 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.05
0.07 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.05
0.01 ±0.04
0.0000 ± 0.0025
0.0028 ± 0.0044
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.0033
0.0003 ±0.001 6
0.0000 ±0.0777
S8-2
3. 52 ±0.35
0.45±0.16
3. 28 ±0.22
40.54 ±3.08
11. 96 ±1.01
9. 02 ±1.14
2. 27 ±0.26
63.86 ±2.31
1.28 ±0.1 5
11. 37 ±0.90
9.43 ± 1 .25
2.26 ±0.42
0.89 ±0.13
0.25 ±0.17
0.81 ±0.25
0.56 ± 0.23
13. 97 ±2.60
11. 03 ±0.69
12.58 ±1.05
5. 09 ±0.87
5.45 ±0.88
0.10±0.07
0.15 ±0.09
2. 22 ±0.60
2.40 ±0.52
1.22 ±0.10
3.35 ±0.30
0.93 ±0.16
1.99 ±0.22
1.28 ±0.27
1.09 ±0.30
10. 95 ±0.69
12.18±1.39
0.13 ±0.07
0.00 ± 0.06
0.09 ±0.09
0.49±0.17
0.95±0.12
0.98 ±0.21
0.82 ±0.11
0.87 ±0.07
0.66 ±0.14
0.81 ±0.40
0.42 ±0.08
4.25 ±0.90
0.62 ±0.17
1.1 7 ±0.27
1.08±0.19
1.09±0.16
1.10±0.13
0.34 ±0.14
0.21 ±0.05
0.50 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.05
2.07 ±0.69
0.07 ±0.05
0.70±0.12
0.37±0.17
0.07 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.54
0.02 ±0.05
0.14 ±0.05
0.44 ±0.11
0.01 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
1 .54 ± 0.33
0.08 ± 0.05
0.40 ± 0.23
0.01 ±0.04
0.24 ±0.07
0.03 ±0.04
0.0000 ±0.0026
0.0065 ±0.0045
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0000 ± 0.0034
0.0000 ±0.001 7
0.0000 ±0.0799
S8-3
0.72 ±0.14
1.1 9 ±0.24
0.08 ±0.06
9.09 ±0.81
2.30 ±0.39
3.41 ±0.57
0.44 ± 0.09
13.90 ±0.63
1.80 ±0.20
2.58 ±0.26
2.08 ±0.32
0.61 ±0.14
0.48 ±0.09
0.19±0.15
0.25±0.12
1.70 ±0.44
1.18±0.25
3. 02 ±0.21
3.49 ±0.33
1.50 ±0.28
1.58 ±0.28
0.08 ±0.06
0.60 ±0.18
0.30 ±0.52
0.98 ±0.22
0.51 ±0.06
1.56 ±0.1 5
0.46 ±0.09
0.90 ±0.11
0.56±0.13
0.10±0.11
6.37 ±0.47
10.68 ±1.23
0.16±0.07
0.01 ±0.06
0.09 ±0.09
0.91 ±0.28
1.02±0.13
1.61 ±0.30
1.51 ±0.17
0.94 ±0.07
0.93 ±0.19
0.83 ±0.40
0.55±0.10
9.27 ±1.51
0.32 ±0.11
1.32 ±0.27
0.74 ±0.1 3
1.08±0.16
1.70±0.19
0.01 ±0.05
0.18±0.05
0.53 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.05
0.77 ±0.63
0.12 ±0.06
0.78±0.12
0.28±0.16
0.03 ±0.05
1.10 ±0.63
0.01 ±0.05
0.10±0.05
0.37 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
1.43 ±0.32
0.05 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.04
0.47 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.04
0.0000 ± 0.0025
0.0001 ± 0.0044
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.001 7
0.0000 ±0.0792
B1-14
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
1 ,5-dinitronaphthalene
5-nitroacenaphthene
9-nitroanthracene
4-nitrophenanthrene
9-nitrophenanthrene
1 ,8-dinitronaphthalene
2-nitrofluoranthene
3-nitrofluoranthene
1-nitropyrene
7-nitrobenzo(a)anthracene
6-nitrochrysene
6-nitrobenz[a]pyrene
Hopanes (ud/milel
18a(H),21G(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane&
17a(H),21G(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),21G(H)-30-Nortiopane
17a(H),21G(H)-Hopane
17G(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-17a(H),21G(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-1 7a(H),21 G(H)-30-Homohopane
17G(H),2m(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21G(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan>
22R-17a(H),2m(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22S-1 7a(H),21 B(H)-30,31 ,32-Trisomohop:
22R-1 7a(H),21 B(H)-30,31 ,32-Trishomoho
Steranes (ug/mile)
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14G(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-cholestane
ster45440(cholestane)
C28-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastanf
C29-20R5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-stigmastan
C29-20S5a(H),14G(H),17G(H)-stigmastam
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastam
Alkanes (ud/milel
Dodecane
Tridecane
Norfamesane
Heptylcyclohexane
Famesane
Tetradecane
Octylcyclohexane
Pentadecane
Nonylcyclohexane
Hexadecane
Norpristane
Heptadecane
Decylcyclohexane
Heptadecane_Pristane
Undecylcyclohexane
Octadecane
Phytane
Dodecylcyclohexane
Nonadecane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Eicosane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Heneicosane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Docosane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Tricosane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Tetracosane
Pentacosane
Nonadecyicyclohexane
Hexacosane
Eicosylcyclohexane
Heptacosane
Heneicosylcyclohexane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Triacontane
Hentriacontane
Dotriacontane
S7-2
0.0000 ± 0.0054
0.0003 ±0.0021
0.0044 ± 0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0038
0.0000 ±0.01 15
0.0026 ±0.0036
0.0274 ±0.0228
0.0029 ±0.0090
0.0253 ±0.0083
0.0056 ±0.0009
0.0045 ±0.001 5
0.0000 ±0.0072
2.66 ±0.25
0.43±0.13
6.20 ±0.92
4.89 ±0.61
0.33 ±0.08
2.82 ±0.22
2.40 ±0.21
0.62±0.13
1.60 ±0.24
1.25±0.19
1.15±0.19
0.72±0.13
0.42 ±0.11
0.88±0.17
0.52 ±0.08
1.20 ±0.1 9
0.12 ±0.07
0.21 ±0.08
0.40 ±0.10
0.30 ±0.08
0.50±0.10
0.96 ±0.28
0.69 ±0.14
0.58±0.10
0.00 ±2.92
0.44 ± 1 .26
5. 36 ±1.27
0.73 ±0.51
9. 54 ±4.35
0.00 ±5.86
0.00 ±1.73
0.00 ±2.94
2. 93 ±2.76
0.02 ±3.85
0.85 ±0.90
0.11 ±2.52
0.90 ±1.13
0.00 ±3.16
0.43 ± 0.53
38. 39 ±3. 17
21 .42 ± 2.02
1.06 ±0.39
24. 13 ±2.73
0.75 ±0.49
15.16±1.21
1.82 ±0.43
14.46 ±1.25
0.38 ±2.32
8. 76 ±3.72
3. 70 ±0.61
6. 75 ±4.71
2.42 ±2.21
1.14 ±1.87
4.34 ±8. 13
3.51 ±8.87
0.42 ±2.18
3.21 ±9.99
0.28 ±0.11
2.88 ±10.00
0.74 ± 0.30
5.12±9.69
4.53 ±6. 87
6. 58 ±5.91
4. 64 ±3.73
5. 97 ±2.74
S7-3
0.0000 ±0.0282
0.0000 ±0.0088
0.0000 ±0.01 70
1 .0440 ± 0.0594
0.0000 ±0.0588
0.0000 ±0.01 44
0.0000 ±0.0663
0.0000 ±0.0320
0.0000 ±0.0205
0.0000 ± 0.0030
0.0000 ± 0.0057
0.0000 ± 0.0231
2.12±0.40
0.00±0.13
1.19 ±0.34
1.07 ±0.32
0.19 ±0.13
0.57 ±0.18
0.00±0.15
4.36 ±0.58
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.28±0.16
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.08±0.13
0.01 ±0.13
0.03 ±0.21
0.09 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.01 ±0.13
0.02±0.13
0.04±0.13
0.02±0.13
3.69 ±9. 98
23. 24 ±7. 16
0.57 ±1.22
0.00 ±1.13
0.00 ±3. 26
3. 76 ±17.59
0.00 ±5. 03
1.02 ±8. 72
0.00 ±7. 30
0.00 ±11. 34
0.00 ±2.35
0.00 ±7.43
0.00 ±3.07
4.90 ±9.37
3.13±1.90
0.00 ±3.64
0.00 ±1.60
1.01 ±0.63
0.00 ± 1 .44
1.51 ±1.34
0.00 ±2. 24
0.78 ±0.25
0.00 ±2. 39
0.00 ±6. 81
0.00 ±10.39
1 .24 ± 0.40
0.00 ±13.72
0.00 ±5.79
0.00±5.19
0.00 ±23.45
0.00 ±25. 39
0.00 ±6.26
0.00 ± 28.86
1.05 ±0.32
0.00 ± 28.93
5.32 ±1.97
0.00 ±28. 17
0.00 ±19. 25
0.00 ±16.31
0.00 ±9. 39
0.00 ±7. 36
S7-1
0.0324 ±0.0312
0.0005 ± 0.0093
0.0000 ±0.01 73
0.0000 ±0.021 3
0.0000 ±0.0598
0.0217 ±0.0171
0.0809 ±0.0760
0.1531 ±0.0443
0.5372 ±0.1 321
0.0000 ±0.0030
0.0000 ±0.0058
0.0000 ±0.0235
1.21 ±0.33
0.07±0.13
1.58 ±0.38
0.31 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.13
0.19±0.18
0.26±0.15
3.61 ±0.49
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.19±0.16
0.00±0.13
0.00±0.13
0.07 ±0.13
0.02 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.05±0.13
0.07±0.13
0.04±0.13
0.01 ±0.13
0.00 ±8.54
0.00 ±3.58
0.00±1.17
6. 82 ±2.62
8. 18 ±5.47
53.66 ±22. 71
14.40 ±6.04
0.00 ±8.78
12.03 ±8.69
45.33 ±12. 27
2.20 ±2.63
21. 95 ±8.40
9.97 ±4.43
24. 68 ±9.82
2.76 ±1.85
23. 24 ±4.29
6.37 ±1.81
0.30 ±0.51
3. 67 ±1.66
0.00±1.17
3. 69 ±2.32
0.46±0.19
0.00 ± 2.44
0.00 ±6.92
0.00 ±10.56
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±13.94
0.00 ±5.90
0.00 ±5.29
0.00 ±23.84
0.00 ±25.81
0.00 ± 6.37
0.00 ±29.32
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±29.40
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±28.62
0.00 ±19. 56
0.00 ±16. 54
0.00 ±9.50
0.00 ±7.44
S8-1
0.0000 ±0.0031
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.001 7
0.0000 ±0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0067
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.01 21
0.0000 ±0.0052
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0000 ± 0.0009
0.0000 ± 0.0042
0.23 ±0.08
0.02 ±0.04
0.26 ±0.08
0.11 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.05
0.04 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.04 ±0.05
0.04 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.04
0.04 ±0.04
0.07 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.05
0.02 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.70
0.00 ±0.71
0.02 ±0.23
0.01 ±0.23
1 .62 ± 1 .08
0.00 ±3. 39
5.57 ± 1 .46
21 .30 ±2.83
0.04 ± 1 .47
1.23 ±2.25
0.90 ±0.58
12.91 ±2.21
1.47 ±0.79
9.00 ±2.02
0.17±0.29
11. 55 ±1.18
1 1 .02 ± 1 .06
0.66 ±0.24
6.39 ±0.82
0.09 ±0.25
0.04 ±0.45
1.67 ±0.38
4.06 ±0.56
0.00 ±1.34
2.47 ±2. 10
0.04 ±0.07
0.69 ±2. 72
0.00 ±1.1 6
0.00 ±1.03
0.65 ±4.68
0.92±5.12
0.01 ±1.26
0.16±5.76
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±5.76
0.07 ±0.06
0.00 ±5.58
0.00 ±3. 84
0.00 ±3. 24
0.10±1.92
0.05 ±1.46
S8-2
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.001 8
0.0000 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0069
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.01 24
0.0000 ±0.0054
0.0007 ±0.0033
0.0002 ±0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0043
0.65 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.05
0.98 ±0.17
0.59 ±0.10
0.01 ±0.04
0.33 ±0.06
0.21 ±0.05
0.01 ±0.04
0.17±0.05
0.13±0.05
0.14 ±0.05
0.10±0.05
0.03 ±0.04
0.16 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.04
0.19 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.04
0.13±0.06
0.08 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.81
0.00 ±0.73
0.70 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.66
0.00 ±3.49
1.67±1.12
43.58 ±4.74
0.00 ± 1 .49
0.91 ±2.31
0.33 ±0.52
0.00 ±1.50
0.1 6 ±0.64
4.84 ±1.96
0.00 ± 0.22
16. 29 ±1.47
8.96 ± 0.89
0.16±0.13
8.44 ± 1 .02
0.00 ±0.24
6. 27 ±0.61
0.18 ±0.07
4.43 ±0.58
0.00 ±1.38
3. 18 ±2. 17
0.69 ±0.15
1.85 ±2.80
0.91 ±1.27
0.00 ±1.06
1.1 2 ±4.82
1.11 ±5.27
0.20 ±1.30
1.14 ±5.96
0.09 ± 0.05
0.40 ±5. 95
0.01 ±0.05
2.11 ±5.78
1.90 ±4.06
2. 59 ±3.46
2.31 ±2.18
3. 75 ±1.65
S8-3
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.001 2
0.0000 ±0.001 8
0.0000 ±0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0069
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.01 23
0.0000 ±0.0053
0.0007 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0000 ± 0.0009
0.0000 ± 0.0043
1.05 ±0.11
0.03 ±0.04
0.84 ±0.15
0.50 ±0.10
0.02 ±0.04
0.30 ±0.06
0.22 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.16±0.05
0.11 ±0.05
0.11 ±0.05
0.13±0.05
0.06 ±0.05
0.15±0.05
0.09 ±0.04
0.18±0.06
0.01 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.04
0.05 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
0.08 ±0.04
0.09 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.04
0.07 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.68
0.00 ±0.72
0.21 ±0.26
0.33 ±0.29
1 .60 ± 1 .09
0.00 ±3.43
0.00 ±1.01
0.00 ± 1 .74
0.00 ± 1 .46
6.84 ±2.39
4.38 ± 1 .24
4.52 ±1.68
0.00 ±0.63
13.81 ±2.23
0.00 ±0.25
6.05 ±0.91
3.22 ±0.47
0.46 ±0.20
4.79 ±0.66
1.96 ±0.59
4.20 ±0.54
0.31 ±0.10
4.38 ±0.58
0.00 ±1.37
3.51 ±2.16
0.00 ±0.07
2.33 ±2.78
0.00 ±1.1 9
0.00 ± 1 .04
0.00 ±4.75
0.00±5.13
0.00 ±1.27
0.00 ±5.81
0.02 ±0.04
0.00 ±5.83
0.03 ±0.06
0.00 ±5.68
0.00 ±3. 88
0.00 ±3. 28
0.00 ±1.90
0.00 ± 1 .48
B1-15
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Tritriacontane
Tetratriacontane
Pentatriacontane
Hexatriacontane
Heptatriacontane
Octatriacontane
Nonatriacontane
Polar comoounds (uo/mile)
heptanoic acid (c7)
me-malonic (d-c3)
guaiacol
benzoic acid
octanoic acid (c8)
phenylacetic acid
maleic acid
succinic acid (d-c4)
4-me-guaiacol
o-toluic
me-succinic acid (d-c4)
m-toluic
nonanoic acid (c9)
p-toluic
2,6-dimethylbenzoic acid
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid (d-c5)
2-methylglutaric (d-c5)
2,5-dimethylbenzoic acid
3-methylglutaric acid (d-c5)
2,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
2,3- and 3,5- dimethylbenzoic acid
decanoic acid (c10)
4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyl-syringol
3,4-dimethyibenzoic acid
hexanedioic (adipic) acid (d-c6)
salcylic acid
trans-2-decenoic acid
cis-pinonic acid
3-methyiadipic acid (d-c6)
4-formyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid (c11)
isoeugenol
heptanedioic (pimelic) acid (d-c7)
2,3-dimethoxybenzoic acid
acetovanillone
2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid
dodecanoic (lauric) acid (c12)
2,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
phthalic acid
suberic acid (d-c8)
levoglucosan
3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
syringaldehyde
3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
tridecanoicacid(c13)
isophthalic acid
vanillic acid
homovanillic acid
azelaic acid (d-c9)
myristoleic acid
myristicacid (c14)
sebacicacid (d-c10)
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid (c15)
undecanedioic acid (d-d 1 )
palmitoleic acid
palmitic acid (c16)
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid (d-c12)
traumatic acid
heptadecanoic acid (c17)
1 ,1 1-undecanedicarboxylic acid (d-c13)
oleic acid
elaidic acid
stearic acid (c18)
1,12-dodecanedicartoxylicacid (d-c14)
8,15-pimaradien-18-oic acd
pimaric acid
S7-2
2. 79 ±1.69
4. 08 ±1.92
2. 67 ±1.14
1 .42 ± 0.52
2. 76 ±1.08
7. 62 ±4.28
0.77 ±0.31
0.00 ±4.34
0.00 ±1.26
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±121 1.41
6.07 ±10. 19
0.00 ±25.26
0.11 ±1.64
5.35 ±10.80
0.00 ± 0.06
101 .57 ±16.06
2.70 ±1.69
130.44 ±8.46
10. 86 ±10.66
98.11 ±14.22
8.91 ±2.19
1.33 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.08
4. 98 ±0.25
0.50 ±0.17
10.52 ±4.91
3. 97 ±3.35
0.00 ±196. 08
9.96 ±1.85
0.00 ±2.95
5.48 ± 0.52
0.69 ± 0.23
20. 65 ±3. 16
0.29 ± 0.95
1.50 ±2. 79
0.00 ±0.46
0.00 ±3.48
7. 27 ±1.32
0.13±0.73
0.79 ±1.41
1.96 ±0.83
1 .36 ± 1 .04
6. 66 ±2.45
0.00 ±3.94
0.31 ±0.13
0.00 ±34.89
3.14±1.14
63.02 ±29. 67
0.00 ±19.03
0.00 ±1.60
1 .37 ± 0.43
0.03 ± 0.07
13. 00 ±4.68
8.13±0.58
0.63 ±0.56
68. 16 ±80.57
0.00 ±5.42
0.00 ±2.42
0.00 ±4.91
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±7.74
0.00 ± 1 .04
5. 80 ±0.84
0.00 ±2.86
0.02 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.82
0.00 ±16.48
0.00 ± 0.34
0.13 ±0.33
0.00 ± 0.06
0.00 ± 3.32
0.00 ±0.09
13.82 ±14. 14
0.15±0.82
0.00 ±18.87
0.76 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.39
7.98±1.16
S7-3
0.05 ±3. 02
0.00 ±3. 23
0.83 ± 1 .44
0.00 ±1.35
0.00 ±0.59
4.98 ±3. 64
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±8.61
0.00 ±1.52
0.26±0.17
0.00 ± 2400.94
0.00 ±15. 63
0.00 ±35. 19
0.00 ±1.66
0.00 ±19. 70
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±5.31
0.00 ±2.93
0.00 ±4. 53
0.00 ±16.59
0.00 ±4. 56
0.00 ±2. 61
0.00 ±0.35
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±0.13
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±3. 64
0.00 ±5.86
0.00 ±361 .97
0.00 ±0.69
0.00 ±4.53
1.03 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.11
3.39 ±3.25
0.00 ±1.70
0.00 ±4.73
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±4. 56
179.64 ±31 .39
8.85 ±2. 56
0.00 ±3.49
0.00 ±0.35
4.30 ±1.44
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±4.00
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±52. 63
0.00 ±1.31
94.91 ±48.17
0.00 ±26. 17
0.84 ±2.65
1.34 ±0.80
0.00 ±0.11
5. 00 ±2.34
3.19±0.25
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±87.71
0.00 ±5. 95
0.00 ±2. 58
0.00 ±5. 67
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±6. 33
0.00 ±1.15
0.00 ±0.59
0.00 ±3.49
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.94
0.00 ±9.21
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±6.09
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±5.74
0.00 ±0.71
0.00 ±39.32
0.00 ±0.25
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±0.88
S7-1
0.00 ±2.77
0.00±3.17
0.00 ±1.1 5
0.00 ±1.37
0.00 ±0.52
0.00 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.28
8.87 ±8.93
1.51 ±1.73
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±2466.03
8.72 ±16.64
0.00 ±33.72
0.00 ±1.69
0.00 ±20.01
0.00 ±0.11
25. 88 ±7. 11
0.00 ±2. 98
44.87 ±5. 52
0.00 ±18.42
36.74 ±7. 76
0.00 ±2.71
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±3.83
0.00 ±5.96
0.00 ±369. 25
0.00 ±0.59
0.00 ±4.60
20. 50 ±2.25
0.87 ± 0.30
3.25 ±3.31
0.00 ±1.77
6.62±5.17
0.00 ±0.55
0.00 ±4.64
14.69 ±2. 67
4.51 ±1.59
0.00 ±2.38
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±1.1 6
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4.06
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±53.61
1.90 ±1.49
0.00 ±41 .74
0.00 ±26.52
0.00 ±1.70
0.00 ± 0.80
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.54
0.00±89.11
0.00 ±6.04
0.00 ±2.62
0.00 ±5.76
24.87 ±3.35
0.00 ±6.51
0.00 ±1.22
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±3.55
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.95
0.00 ±9.37
0.00 ± 0.54
0.00 ± 0.38
0.00 ±0.11
0.00±6.19
0.00 ±0.11
3.19±34.78
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±31 .88
0.00 ±0.26
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±0.89
S8-1
0.09 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.64
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.27
0.02 ±0.14
0.01 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.06
8. 19 ±4.35
3.28 ± 1 .45
0.42 ±0.14
0.00 ±1180.86
19. 96 ±10.23
0.00 ± 25.88
6.30 ±1.91
4.30 ±10.48
0.55 ±0.06
6.21 ±3.83
1.85 ±1.59
1 1 .06 ± 2.42
34.27 ±14.25
9.42 ±3. 29
1.61 ±1.85
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
1.21 ±0.12
0.82 ±0.24
0.00 ±2.00
0.00 ±3. 14
0.00 ±193.90
0.29 ±0.39
0.00 ±2.87
61 .72 ±6. 64
0.00 ±0.05
1.19±2.11
0.00 ±0.90
0.30 ±2.69
0.00 ±0.45
0.00 ±3. 38
0.38 ±0.27
0.12±0.70
0.00 ±1.35
0.44 ± 0.32
0.17±0.98
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±3.83
0.27 ±0.11
0.59 ±33. 96
7.76 ±2.09
181 .55 ±44.35
0.00 ±18.49
0.52 ±1.63
0.42 ± 0.40
0.09 ±0.06
1.67 ±0.76
2. 75 ±0.20
0.86 ±0.56
1.76 ±75.93
0.00 ±5. 27
0.00 ±2. 33
0.00 ±4. 77
0.00 ±0.21
20.93 ±10.71
0.00 ±1.00
9.29 ±1.18
0.00 ±2.78
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±16. 03
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±3.22
0.00 ±0.06
12.97±11.17
0.91 ±0.79
0.00 ±18.35
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.48
S8-2
1.70 ±1.02
2.52±1.17
1.18 ±0.56
2. 23 ±0.40
0.94 ±0.42
1 .62 ± 1 .05
0.55 ±0.22
2.82 ±4.38
0.00 ±1.25
0.33 ±0.13
0.00 ±121 1.95
8.78 ±10. 19
0.32 ±25.95
24.82 ± 3.47
6.26 ±10.79
0.00 ± 0.09
19. 14 ±4.97
1.17±1.62
37.69 ±3. 37
15. 59 ±11. 26
26. 17 ±4. 94
4. 03 ±1.95
0.00 ±0.07
0.81 ±0.08
2. 29 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.05
0.05 ±2.06
0.00 ±3.23
0.00 ±194. 75
4. 17 ±0.88
0.00 ± 2.95
17. 55 ±1.42
0.43 ±0.15
6. 14 ±2.28
1.49 ±1.01
6.11 ±2.98
0.00 ±0.46
0.00 ±3.47
42.63 ±7. 38
6.71 ±1.49
0.00 ±1.39
0.00 ±0.28
0.18 ±1.02
0.00 ±0.05
6.72 ±3.99
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±34.82
2.23 ± 0.98
83.25 ±31 .39
0.00 ±19.01
0.00 ±1.54
0.02 ± 0.41
0.16±0.07
4.17±1.59
2.87 ±0.21
0.36 ±0.55
223.29 ±91 .80
0.00 ±5.41
0.00 ±2.48
0.00 ±4.90
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±7.41
0.00 ±1.03
0.38 ±0.51
0.00 ±2.85
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.81
0.00 ±16. 14
0.00 ± 0.34
0.00 ± 0.33
0.00 ± 0.05
0.00 ±3. 31
0.00 ±0.06
5.79 ±9. 26
0.00 ±0.81
0.00 ±18. 64
1.06 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.39
8. 73 ±1.25
S8-3
0.00 ±0.56
0.00 ±0.64
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.07
6.65 ±4.40
0.00 ± 1 .24
0.60±0.17
6333.88 ±1431 .36
11.50±10.16
41 .42 ±35.35
93. 23 ±10.35
13.45 ±10.86
0.00 ±0.27
33.63 ±6. 61
3.28 ±1.65
55. 99 ±4.28
14. 18 ±10.88
49. 55 ±7.80
16.49 ±2.48
0.00 ±0.09
1.04 ±0.10
2.57 ±0.19
0.51 ±0.16
12.63 ±5.07
6.09 ±3.43
1330.77 ±303.33
5.48 ± 1 .06
0.88 ±4.81
11. 90 ±1.31
0.00 ±0.05
8.65 ±2.37
0.72 ±0.95
2.71 ±2.79
0.22 ±0.46
0.00 ±3.44
2.37 ±0.52
1.37 ±0.85
0.91 ±1.40
0.00 ±0.28
0.47 ±1.01
0.00 ±0.05
7.30 ±3.95
0.20 ±0.09
5.77 ± 34.64
3.17±1.14
127.93 ±34 .49
0.00 ±18. 83
0.72 ±1.71
1.86 ±0.44
0.88±0.17
6.71 ±2.47
4. 72 ±0.34
0.57 ±0.55
416.19±112.32
14. 32 ±5.98
8.84 ±3.48
1.91 ±4.87
13.13±1.57
38.29 ±14.43
0.00 ±1.03
0.61 ±0.52
0.53 ±2.85
0.24 ±0.21
2.23 ±1.32
0.70 ±15. 60
0.00 ±0.33
0.13±0.32
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±3.36
0.20 ±0.08
0.00 ±6.69
0.32 ±0.81
0.00 ±19.09
1.09 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.38
3.33 ±0.66
B1-16
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
sandaracopimaric acid
nonadecanoic acid (c19)
isopimaric acid
palustric acid
dihydroisopimaric acid
8-abietic acid
dehydroabietic acid
8,14-abietenic acid
abietic acid
eicosanoic acid (c20)
levopimaric acid
heneicosanoic acid (c21)
7-oxodehydroabietic acid
docosanoic acid (c22)
tricosanoic acid (c23)
tetracosanoic acid (c24)
cholesterol
cholestanol
ergosterol
stigmasterol
sitosterol
Carbonvls (mo/mile)
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acetone
* acrolein
propionaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
Methacrolein
* n-butyraldehyde
benzaldehyde
glyoxal
valeraldehyde
tolualdehyde
hexanal
* acrolein converts to an unknown rear
1 ,3 butadiene (estimated)
C2 compounds
propene
propane
isoButane
1 Butene+iButylene
n-Butane
t-2-Butene
c-2-Butene
3-Me-1-Butene
isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Me-1-Butene
n-Pentane
t-2-Pentene
c-2-Pentene
2-Me-2-Butene
22DiMeButane
CycloPentene
CycloPentane
23DiMeButane
MTBE
2-MePentane
3-MePentane
2-Me-1-Pentene
1-Hexene
n-Hexane
t-2-Hexene
2-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Hexene
c-2-Hexene
t-3-Me-2-Pentene
MeCyPentane
2,4-DiMePentane
223TriMeButane
Benzene
CycloHexane
4MeHexene
2MeHexane
23DiMePentane
SMeHexane
S7-2
0.00±0.17
0.00 ±5.64
0.00 ±0.59
0.39 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±7.81
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±1.78
0.00 ± 0.06
0.00 ± 2.00
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±5. 61
0.00 ±0.93
0.29 ±0.64
0.00 ±1.04
0.00 ±7. 03
0.00 ±0.06
0.00±2.18
0.00 ±0.06
3. 08 ±0.02
0.85 ±0.33
0.50 ±0.47
0.99 ±0.25
0.21 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.21 ±0.04
0.18 ±0.01
0.1 5 ±0.04
1.15±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.10±0.01
0.10±0.01
5.608 ±8.300
65. 798 ±16.200
41 .502 ±8.773
1.215 ±0.069
3.258 ±0.210
22.886 ±2.696
6.036 ±0.580
2.860 ±0.451
1.499 ±0.097
49.584 ± 5.482
2.660 ±0.278
4.655 ±0.586
16.277 ±1.650
0.022 ±0.007
4.522 ±0.257
2.530 ±0.377
4.312 ±0.403
5.490 ± 0.602
1.537 ±0.1 69
2.398 ±0.1 20
9.557 ±0.966
0.786 ±0.066
32.171 ±3.130
23.141 ±1.212
1 .249 ± 0.046
1.886 ±0.1 75
19.996 ±1.706
1 .942 ± 0.099
1 .042 ± 0.095
0.794 ±0.035
0.229 ±0.01 2
1.023 ±0.076
0.318 ±0.019
13.809 ±1.372
10.405 ±0.534
0.430 ±0.039
63.746 ±7.401
<28.39± 0.437
0.363 ±0.059
18.111 ±0.747
18.054 ±0.636
<24.03 ± 0.894
S7-3
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±10.22
0.00 ±0.98
0.00 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±9. 08
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.80
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.69
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±8.92
0.00 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.91
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±8. 17
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 54
0.00 ±0.11
1.85 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.98
0.00 ±1.41
0.28 ±0.07
0.11 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.11
0.03 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.02
0.67 ±0.02
0.01 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.02
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.02
1 .046 ± 1 .548
14.473 ±3.564
7.739 ±1.636
0.487 ±0.028
1.1 33 ±0.073
4.304 ±0.507
0.964 ±0.093
0.595 ±0.094
0.281 ±0.018
19. 187 ±2. 121
0.423 ±0.044
0.789 ±0.099
4. 168 ±0.422
0.045 ±0.01 3
0.764 ±0.043
0.403 ±0.060
0.382 ±0.036
2.131 ±0.234
0.245 ±0.026
0.651 ±0.032
2.336 ±0.236
0.1 08 ±0.009
7.762 ±0.755
5. 137 ±0.269
0.1 58 ±0.006
0.245 ±0.023
3.732 ±0.31 8
0.234 ±0.01 2
0.044 ±0.004
0.050 ±0.002
0.029 ±0.002
0.1 22 ±0.009
0.1 04 ±0.006
2.899 ±0.288
1.680 ±0.086
0.086 ±0.008
13. 399 ±1.556
<5.23± 0.099
0.043 ±0.007
3.251 ±0.134
2.232 ±0.079
<4.24± 0.158
S7-1
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±10. 39
0.00 ±1.00
0.00 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±9.23
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.82
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ± 2.73
0.00 ± 0.27
0.00 ±9. 07
0.00 ±0.76
0.00 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±8. 31
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2.58
0.00 ±0.11
5.40 ±0.06
0.77 ±0.99
0.00 ±1.41
2. 30 ±0.58
0.30 ±0.04
0.12 ±0.01
0.13±0.11
0.31 ±0.01
0.37 ± 0.09
1.92 ±0.02
0.01 ±0.01
0.05 ±0.02
0.05 ±0.03
0.05 ±0.02
2.471 ±3.657
23.293 ±5.735
18.285 ±3.865
0.763 ± 0.043
1.170 ±0.075
8.023 ± 0.945
1.757 ±0.1 69
1.407 ±0.222
0.796 ±0.051
37.141 ±4.106
1.231 ±0.128
1.406 ±0.1 77
6.295 ±0.638
0.053 ±0.01 6
2.317 ±0.132
1.140 ±0.170
0.348 ± 0.033
1.440 ±0.158
0.559 ±0.062
0.879 ± 0.044
3. 720 ±0.376
0.359 ±0.030
12.61 8 ±1.228
8.349 ± 0.437
0.265 ±0.010
0.602 ±0.056
5. 734 ±0.489
0.767 ±0.039
0.041 ±0.004
0.079 ±0.004
0.082 ±0.005
0.356 ±0.027
0.106 ±0.006
5. 103 ±0.507
3. 993 ±0.205
0.169 ±0.015
16.533 ±1.91 9
<1 0.39 ±0.396
0.111 ±0.018
5. 126 ±0.211
5. 109 ±0.180
<6.44 ± 0.240
S8-1
1.40±0.19
0.29 ±5.49
0.00 ±0.57
0.97 ±0.52
0.00 ±0.22
0.23 ±0.36
0.00 ±7. 64
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±1.73
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ± 1 .94
0.45 ±0.1 5
0.88 ±5.47
0.00 ±0.90
1.36 ±0.80
0.00 ±0.99
0.02 ±6.82
0.00 ±0.05
0.00±2.12
0.00 ±0.05
1.85 ±0.01
0.52 ±0.19
0.70 ±0.27
0.37 ±0.09
0.10±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.19±0.02
0.04 ±0.01
0.12±0.03
0.55 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.04 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.81 3 ±1.204
6.697 ±1.649
6.01 8 ±1.272
0.609 ±0.035
0.444 ±0.029
3.523 ±0.41 5
0.620 ±0.060
0.544 ±0.086
0.214 ±0.014
12. 593 ±1.392
0.571 ±0.060
0.654 ±0.082
2.437 ±0.247
0.487 ±0.144
0.567 ±0.032
0.317±0.047
1.106 ±0.103
0.61 8 ±0.068
0.230 ±0.025
0.298 ±0.01 5
1.273 ±0.129
0.014 ±0.001
3.804 ±0.370
2.632 ±0.138
0.1 52 ±0.006
0.266 ±0.025
8.708 ±0.743
0.209 ±0.011
0.270 ±0.025
0.263 ±0.011
0.032 ±0.002
0.128±0.010
0.235 ±0.014
2. 124 ±0.211
1.265 ±0.065
0.046 ±0.004
9.254 ± 1 .074
0.585 ±0.059
0.054 ±0.009
2. 139 ±0.088
2.018±0.071
2.412±0.102
S8-2
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±5.63
0.00 ±0.59
0.38 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.23
0.09 ±0.35
0.00 ±7.80
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±1.78
0.00 ± 0.05
0.00 ± 2.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±5. 59
0.00 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.54
0.00 ±1.00
0.00 ±7. 01
0.00 ±0.05
0.00±2.18
0.00 ±0.05
2. 59 ±0.01
1.01 ±0.20
0.56 ±0.28
0.78 ±0.19
0.16 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.20 ±0.02
0.09 ±0.01
0.11 ±0.03
0.88 ±0.01
0.02 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.988 ± 1 .462
17.91 6 ±4.411
7.308 ± 1 .545
0.944 ±0.053
0.439 ±0.028
4. 353 ±0.51 3
0.647 ±0.062
0.550 ±0.087
0.246 ±0.01 6
9. 903 ±1.095
0.457 ± 0.048
0.690 ±0.087
3.137 ±0.318
0.144 ±0.043
0.656 ±0.037
0.364 ±0.054
1.030 ±0.096
0.723 ±0.079
0.290 ±0.032
0.413 ±0.021
1.302 ±0.1 32
<4.31 ±0.447
<4.31 ±0.419
2.711 ±0.142
0.152 ±0.006
0.304 ±0.028
2. 367 ±0.202
0.237 ±0.01 2
0.214 ±0.019
0.146 ±0.006
0.1 15 ±0.006
0.121 ±0.009
0.216 ±0.013
1.680 ±0.1 67
1.186 ±0.061
0.050 ±0.005
9.177±1.066
0.705 ±0.071
0.049 ±0.008
2. 009 ±0.083
1.817 ±0.064
2.231 ±0.095
S8-3
0.25±0.16
0.00 ±5. 58
0.22 ±0.59
0.43 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±7.73
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±1.76
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±1.98
0.59±0.17
0.00 ±5.55
0.18±0.92
0.00 ±1.03
1 .25 ± 1 .03
3. 79 ±6.99
0.00 ±0.05
0.00±2.16
0.00 ±0.05
4.25 ±0.01
1.81 ±0.20
0.58 ±0.28
1.29 ±0.32
0.25 ±0.01
0.01 ±0.01
0.17±0.02
0.18±0.01
0.03 ±0.02
1.39±0.01
0.01 ±0.01
0.03 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.00 ±0.01
0.552 ±0.81 7
12. 896 ±3.175
4.083 ±0.863
0.880 ±0.050
0.535 ±0.035
3.685 ± 0.434
0.692 ±0.067
0.529 ±0.083
0.157±0.010
13. 064 ±1.444
0.41 3 ±0.043
0.737 ±0.093
3.628 ±0.368
0.035 ±0.010
0.802 ±0.046
0.411 ±0.061
1.01 3 ±0.095
1.130±0.124
0.31 5 ±0.035
0.469 ±0.023
1.682 ±0.170
<5.44 ±0.564
<5.44 ±0.530
3.407 ±0.179
0.1 52 ±0.006
0.248 ±0.023
2.679 ±0.229
0.291 ±0.015
0.21 9 ±0.020
0.1 56 ±0.007
0.046 ±0.002
0.137±0.010
0.232 ±0.014
1.964 ±0.195
1 .349 ±0.069
0.067 ±0.006
7.61 6 ±0.884
1.018±0.102
0.042 ±0.007
2.242 ±0.092
2.025 ±0.071
2.452 ±0.104
B1-17
-------
Appendix B1. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Roundl
Species Description
Cyclohexene
SEtPentane
* 1-Heptene
* 224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
2MeHeptane
4MeHeptane
SMeHeptane
Hexanal
225TMHexane
Octene-1
1 1 DMeCyHexane
n-Octane
24DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
33DiMeHeptane
EtBenzene
m/p-xylene
2MeOctane
SMeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
n-Nonane
iPropBenzene
IPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
nPropBenzene
mEtToluene
pEtToluene
135TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
Octanal
beta-pinene
* 124TriMeBenzene
* n-Decane
iButBenzene
sButBenzene
Limonene
Indan
13diethylbenzene
14diethylbenzene
12diethylbenzene
2-propylToluene
3-ipropyltoluene
4-ipropyitoluene
2-ipropyltoluene
Nonanal
n-Undecane
1245tetraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1234tetraMeBenzene
n-Dodecane
S7-2
0.000 ±0.573
5. 116 ±0.060
1.210 ±4. 152
34.007 ±0.023
0.629 ±0.490
14.632 ±0.009
0.091 ±0.357
5. 165 ±0.552
4. 726 ±0.360
8.474 ± 0.365
9. 859 ±5.793
122.604 ±0.437
4.899 ± 0.409
8.222 ±0.353
3.705 ±0.31 3
9.434 ± 0.044
0.100 ±0.006
4.570 ±0.061
0.501 ±0.007
0.310 ±0.266
6.951 ±0.132
1.489 ±0.048
2.848 ± 0.038
0.289 ±2.21 5
32.691 ±5.476
88. 176 ±0.033
1.471 ±0.416
3.945 ± 0.050
0.639 ±1.631
33.355 ±0.010
0.210 ±0.082
3.002 ±0.1 18
2.404 ±0.052
0.428 ± 0.024
0.226 ±0.375
1.128 ±0.405
6.048 ± 0.655
22.303 ±0.374
9. 337 ±0.41 8
9.766 ± 0.344
7. 920 ±0.091
0.224 ±0.014
0.207 ±1.290
28.536 ±0.142
1.469 ±0.031
0.644 ±0.028
0.498 ±0.671
<6.48±0.102
<3. 05 ±0.1 91
1.906 ±0.067
0.712 ±0.065
0.549 ±0.057
1 .283 ± 0.042
0.897 ± 0.044
0.121 ±0.037
<3. 05 ±0.621
4. 236 ±0.689
0.522 ±0.062
1.317 ±0.091
1.674 ±0.031
0.390 ±0.070
0.533 ± 0.064
S7-3
0.000 ±0.100
0.894 ±0.010
0.206 ±0.657
5.379 ±0.002
0.064 ±0.090
2.691 ±0.005
0.053 ±0.071
1.027±0.117
1.004 ±0.061
1.433 ±0.045
1.21 8 ±0.909
21 .454 ± 0.067
0.754 ±0.071
1 .429 ±0.055
0.574 ±0.052
1.567 ±0.005
0.000 ±0.01 7
0.704 ±0.004
0.033 ±0.001
0.035 ±0.048
1.261 ±0.015
0.1 69 ±0.008
0.458 ±0.003
0.023 ±0.308
4.545 ±0.793
12. 778 ±0.006
0.276 ±0.068
0.644 ±0.01 6
0.203 ±0.229
4.690 ±0.002
0.039 ±0.01 7
0.642 ±0.01 7
0.347 ±0.010
0.081 ±0.004
0.036 ±0.279
0.840 ±0.057
0.853 ±0.101
3.445 ±0.064
1.589 ±0.071
1.662 ±0.053
1 .224 ±0.006
0.01 5 ±0.003
0.042 ±0.228
5.037 ±0.031
0.327 ±0.006
0.1 15 ±0.005
0.088 ±0.129
<1. 25 ±0.020
<0.52± 0.040
0.402 ±0.014
0.176±0.016
0.113±0.012
0.278 ±0.009
0.1 73 ±0.008
0.032 ±0.010
<0.52± 0.107
1.188±0.193
0.140±0.017
0.526 ±0.036
0.710±0.013
0.248 ±0.044
0.320 ±0.038
S7-1
0.000 ±0.161
1 .438 ± 0.022
0.448 ± 1 .258
10.308 ±0.008
0.225 ±0.1 04
3. 118 ±0.012
0.126 ±0.098
1.423 ±0.1 62
1.389 ±0.1 06
2.487 ±0.088
2.372 ± 1 .324
31 .255 ±0.1 03
1.151 ±0.106
2.131 ±0.083
0.874 ±0.078
2. 340 ±0.01 2
0.050 ±0.01 7
0.887 ±0.011
0.089 ±0.001
0.053 ±0.052
1.367 ±0.026
0.295 ±0.01 2
0.737 ±0.004
0.031 ±0.478
7.053 ± 1 .040
16.755 ±0.005
0.204 ±0.101
0.958 ±0.008
0.098 ±0.288
5. 896 ±0.002
0.045 ±0.01 7
0.608 ±0.023
0.465 ±0.01 3
0.108 ±0.008
0.079 ±0.1 13
0.341 ±0.073
1.090 ±0.1 12
3. 826 ±0.064
1.599 ±0.071
1 .652 ± 0.054
1.252 ±0.021
0.052 ±0.006
0.095 ±0.1 82
4. 037 ±0.039
0.403 ±0.007
0.149 ±0.006
0.106 ±0.097
<0. 94 ±0.000
<0.61 ±0.034
0.341 ±0.012
0.197 ±0.018
0.154 ±0.016
0.217 ±0.007
0.143 ±0.007
0.012 ±0.004
<0.61 ±0.125
0.570 ±0.093
0.211 ±0.025
0.156 ±0.011
0.194 ±0.004
0.070 ±0.01 2
0.220 ±0.027
S8-1
0.092 ±0.026
0.236 ±0.000
<3.80± 0.000
<3.80± 0.001
0.042 ±0.061
1.81 8 ±0.002
0.019±0.061
0.877 ±0.072
0.620 ±0.035
0.813±0.040
1.078 ±0.680
16. 064 ±0.036
0.399 ±0.047
0.958 ±0.049
0.518±0.040
1.21 5 ±0.020
0.030 ±0.010
0.822 ±0.008
0.065 ±0.005
0.197±0.041
1.059 ±0.011
0.1 22 ±0.006
0.383 ±0.027
0.207 ±0.249
3.674 ±0.532
8.574 ±0.01 8
0.796 ±0.074
0.701 ±0.011
0.138±0.173
3.539 ±0.030
0.664 ±0.01 6
0.587 ±0.014
0.284 ±0.002
0.020 ±0.01 9
0.1 78 ±0.020
0.060 ±0.051
0.765 ±0.071
2.429 ±0.043
1.067 ±0.039
0.899 ±0.042
0.962 ±0.026
0.064 ±0.001
0.014±0.119
<2.64± 0.271
<2.64± 0.003
0.054 ±0.003
0.053 ±0.035
0.342 ±0.009
0.1 55 ±0.056
0.557 ±0.020
0.051 ±0.005
0.031 ±0.003
0.089 ±0.003
0.1 15 ±0.006
0.025 ±0.007
0.034 ±0.007
0.072 ±0.01 2
0.158±0.019
0.1 29 ±0.009
0.171 ±0.003
0.176±0.031
0.862 ±0.103
S8-2
0.047 ±0.072
0.639 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.543
4.443 ±0.001
0.032 ±0.057
1.695 ±0.006
0.064 ±0.059
0.861 ±0.071
0.606 ±0.047
1.107 ±0.046
1.253 ±0.71 7
16.925 ±0.010
0.1 10 ±0.052
1 .057 ± 0.034
0.354 ±0.037
1.124 ±0.001
0.000 ±0.01 3
0.524 ±0.002
0.018 ±0.001
0.047 ±0.031
0.814 ±0.001
0.006 ±0.001
0.071 ±0.007
0.054 ±0.234
3.450 ±0.580
9. 336 ±0.002
0.102 ±0.003
0.030 ±0.032
0.406 ±0.1 82
3. 734 ±0.005
0.101 ±0.012
0.441 ±0.006
0.122 ±0.013
0.1 10 ±0.008
0.076 ±0.01 2
0.035 ±0.072
1.072 ±0.1 10
3. 742 ±0.069
1.714 ±0.086
2. 013 ±0.067
1.539 ±0.032
0.079 ±0.002
0.036 ±0.233
5. 160 ±0.051
0.526 ±0.002
0.052 ±0.007
0.135 ±0.127
1.231 ±0.002
0.644 ±0.049
0.487 ±0.01 7
0.303 ±0.028
0.198 ±0.021
0.315 ±0.010
0.084 ±0.004
0.126 ±0.038
0.107 ±0.021
0.594 ±0.097
0.384 ±0.045
0.374 ±0.026
0.522 ±0.010
0.147 ±0.026
0.178 ±0.021
S8-3
0.074 ±0.072
0.638 ±0.000
0.000 ±0.542
4.441 ±0.001
0.020 ±0.058
1.728 ±0.005
0.053 ±0.054
0.786 ±0.072
0.618±0.046
1.082 ±0.045
1.21 7 ±0.665
15. 710 ±0.009
0.1 02 ±0.054
1.084 ±0.041
0.426 ±0.039
1.1 70 ±0.025
0.000 ±0.01 3
0.51 7 ±0.002
0.020 ±0.001
0.038 ±0.034
0.871 ±0.001
0.012±0.001
0.086 ±0.009
0.067 ±0.288
4.256 ±0.797
12. 837 ±0.003
0.1 27 ±0.003
0.027 ±0.01 9
0.245 ±0.231
4.737 ±0.005
0.098 ±0.014
0.500 ±0.01 3
0.272 ±0.002
0.01 7 ±0.006
0.058 ±0.011
0.033 ±0.085
1.276 ±0.147
5.011 ±0.090
2.254±0.115
2.679 ±0.078
1.786 ±0.014
0.036 ±0.008
0.128±0.361
7.970 ±0.039
0.406 ±0.007
0.1 38 ±0.006
0.112±0.184
1.775 ±0.001
0.809 ±0.078
0.784 ±0.028
0.461 ±0.042
0.147±0.015
0.570 ±0.01 9
0.060 ±0.003
0.1 28 ±0.039
0.094 ±0.01 9
1.410 ±0.229
0.336 ±0.040
1.01 5 ±0.070
1 .480 ±0.027
0.1 82 ±0.032
0.277 ±0.033
B1-18
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
Carbon fractions by TOR (mg/mi)
Organic Carbon Fraction 1
Organic Carbon Fraction 2
Organic Carbon Fraction 3
Organic Carbon Fraction 4
Pyrolyzed Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Elemental Carbon Fraction 1
Elemental Carbon Fraction 2
Elemental Carbon Fraction 3
Total Elemental Carbon
Total Carbon
Elements byXRF (mq/mil
Sodium (qualitative only)
Magnesium (qualitative only)
Silicon
Phosphorous
Sulfur
Chlorine
Potassium
Calcium
Titanium
Chromium
Manganese
Iron
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Arsenic
Selenium
Bromine
Rubidium
Strontium
Yttrium
Zirconium
Palladium
Silver
Cadmium
Indium
Tin
Antimony
Barium
Gold
Mercury
Thallium
Lead
Uranium
Anions bvIC (mq/mi)
Nitrate I on
Sulfate Ion
Polvcvclic aromatic hydrocarbons (ug/milei
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1-methylnaphthalene
Biphenyl
1+2ethylnaphthalene
2,6+2,7-dimethylnaphthalene
1,3+1, 6+1 Jdimethylnaphth
1 ,4+1 ,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
1,2-dimethylnaphthalene
2-Methylbiphenyl
3-Methylbiphenyl
4-Methylbiphenyl
Dibenzofuran
A-trimethylnaphthalene
1-ethyl-2-methylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphthalene
C-trimethylnaphthalene
2-ethyl-1-methylnaphthalene
E-trimethylnaphthalene
F-trimethylnaphthalene
2,3,5-H-trimethylnaphthalene
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
J-trimethylnaphthalene
1 ,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
WO-1
0.85 ±0.06
0.297 ±0.035
0.152 ±0.019
0.059 ±0.032
0.000 ±0.005
0.684 ±0.062
0.059 ±0.018
0.084 ±0.022
0.000 ±0.002
0.143 ±0.039
0.827 ±0.080
0.0014 ±0.0064
0.0005 ±0.0064
0.0006 ±0.0043
0.0091 ±0.0022
0.0019 ±0.0004
0.0121 ±0.0010
0.0010 ±0.0004
0.0006 ±0.0006
0.0103 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.0010 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0132 ±0.0015
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0008 ±0.0002
0.0051 ±0.0007
0.0005 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0004 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0007
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0006 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0010 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0026 ±0.0021
0.0012 ±0.0050
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.0004 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.01 ±0.00
0.03 ±0.00
51.40±10.19
55.38 ±5.78
24.78 ±2.80
2.87 ±0.41
20.89 ±3.03
8.22 ±1.04
13.28 ±1.70
0.89 ±0.34
1.32 ±0.27
0.00 ±16.31
0.00 ±3.85
0.00 ±1.37
1.29±0.15
1.65±0.15
0.31 ±0.04
2.22 ±0.34
1.71 ±0.15
0.02 ±0.03
0.92 ±0.09
1.01 ±0.12
1.32±0.16
0.26 ±0.05
0.31 ±0.05
0.03 ±0.03
2. 16 ±0.31
1.27 ±0.53
3.65 ±0.38
WO-2
0.27 ±0.08
0.330 ±0.054
0.139 ±0.028
0.026 ±0.048
0.000 ±0.009
0.655 ±0.088
0.014 ±0.024
0.028 ±0.032
0.000 ±0.003
0.035 ±0.053
0.687±0.112
0.0048 ±0.0103
0.0008 ±0.0102
0.0000 ±0.0069
0.0042 ±0.0033
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0090 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0081 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0004 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0014
0.0064 ±0.0022
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0004 ± 0.0004
0.0003 ±0.0003
0.0015 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0012 ±0.0014
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0015
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0009 ±0.0014
0.0005 ±0.0014
0.0005 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0080
0.0014 ±0.0015
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.0010
0.0005 ±0.0014
0.01 ±0.00
0.03 ±0.00
80.89 ±14.99
109.34±11.39
47.01 ±5.25
4.76 ±0.67
24. 16 ±3.50
11. 69 ±1.50
18.71 ±2.42
3.66 ±0.83
1.88 ±0.50
55.40 ±25.35
25.51 ±7.26
7.31 ±2.45
1.16±0.15
2.04 ±0.20
0.38 ±0.07
1.97 ±0.32
1.80±0.17
0.03 ±0.07
1.00±0.12
1.10±0.15
1.36±0.18
0.25 ±0.08
0.16 ±0.07
0.11 ±0.07
5.40 ±0.73
0.00 ±0.38
3. 16 ±0.35
WO-3
0.50 ±0.06
0.380 ± 0.044
0.126 ±0.019
0.037 ±0.035
0.000 ±0.006
0.645 ±0.066
0.078 ±0.026
0.059 ±0.024
0.024 ±0.020
0.160 ±0.047
0.802 ±0.087
0.0057 ±0.0075
0.0002 ±0.0074
0.0015 ±0.0050
0.0093 ±0.0025
0.0019 ±0.0005
0.0119±0.0010
0.0006 ±0.0004
0.0006 ±0.0007
0.0122 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.0007 ±0.0004
0.0003 ±0.0011
0.0217 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0004 ±0.0003
0.0009 ±0.0003
0.0045 ±0.0007
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0006 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0002 ±0.0008
0.0002 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0006 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0004 ±0.0010
0.0004 ± 0.0024
0.0020 ±0.0058
0.0003 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0007 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.01 ±0.00
0.03 ±0.00
49.75±10.12
71. 23 ±7.43
2.97 ±0.43
10.24 ±1.59
7.88 ±1.01
12.10±1.58
1.87 ±0.46
1.44 ±0.31
0.00 ±11. 29
0.00 ±3. 11
0.00±1.17
0.90 ±0.11
1.33±0.13
0.27 ±0.04
1.36 ±0.23
1.19±0.11
0.01 ±0.04
0.67 ±0.08
0.72 ±0.09
0.94 ±0.12
0.10 ±0.04
0.21 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
5.61 ±0.66
0.00 ±0.41
1.92 ±0.21
WO-4
0.39 ±0.06
0.178 ±0.024
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
13
034 ± 0.034
004 ± 0.006
710 ±0.068
045 ±0.021
000 ±0.002
080 ± 0.040
788 ±0.085
072 ±0.0073
012 ±0.0072
020 ± 0.0049
045 ± 0.0024
016 ±0.0005
119±0.0010
002 ± 0.0004
007 ±0.0007
081 ±0.0006
002 ±0.0002
000 ±0.0001
006 ± 0.0004
003 ±0.0010
103 ±0.0016
001 ±0.0002
002 ±0.0003
013 ±0.0003
044 ± 0.0007
001 ±0.0009
000 ±0.0002
000 ±0.0002
002 ±0.0003
000 ±0.0002
003 ±0.0005
001 ±0.0003
000 ±0.0007
000 ±0.0008
010 ±0.0010
005 ±0.0008
000 ±0.0010
001 ±0.0008
003 ±0.0010
005 ±0.0010
005 ± 0.0024
000 ±0.0056
004 ±0.0011
003 ± 0.0004
000 ±0.0008
003 ±0.0007
004 ±0.0010
.01 ±0.00
.03 ±0.00
3.92 ±21. 34
6.98 ±14.09
68 ± 0.64
.01 ±2.24
.20 ±1.64
.74 ±2.61
88 ± 0.46
17 ±0.38
00 ±10.87
00 ±2.98
00 ±1.11
52 ±0.18
30 ±0.21
46 ±0.05
44 ± 0.38
84 ±0.16
03 ± 0.04
17±0.12
19±0.14
54 ±0.18
22 ±0.05
35 ±0.06
08 ± 0.04
96 ±0.59
00 ±0.39
42 ±0.36
wo-s
0.90 ±0.07
0.158 ±0.022
0.101 ±0.040
0.070 ±0.025
0.900 ±0.078
0.156 ±0.036
0.000 ±0.002
0.171 ±0.046
1.070 ±0.096
0.0012 ±0.0070
0.0041 ±0.0070
0.0034 ± 0.0047
0.0256 ±0.0027
0.0052 ±0.0005
0.0298 ±0.0017
0.0021 ±0.0004
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0236 ±0.0013
0.0003 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.0020 ±0.0004
0.0003 ±0.0010
0.0626 ±0.0035
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0004 ±0.0003
0.0013 ±0.0002
0.0081 ±0.0008
0.0008 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0006 ±0.0007
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0011 ±0.0010
0.0007 ±0.0007
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0002 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0023
0.0005 ±0.0055
0.0005 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0014 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.01 ±0.00
0.05 ±0.00
64.48 ±12.34
87.69 ±9.09
3.80 ±0.54
16.23 ±2.41
9.86 ±1.24
15.23 ±1.95
0.58 ±0.40
1.63 ±0.33
0.00 ±13.34
0.00 ±3.84
0.00 ±1.32
0.00 ±0.04
1.58±0.15
0.33 ±0.04
1.91 ±0.30
1.52±0.13
0.04 ± 0.04
0.89 ±0.09
0.96 ±0.12
1.19±0.15
0.20 ±0.05
0.09 ±0.04
0.10 ±0.05
3.82 ±0.48
0.00 ±0.26
3.53 ±0.38
WO-6
0.45 ±0.06
0.041 ±0.034
0.009 ±0.007
0.068 ±0.023
0.000 ±0.002
0.102 ±0.041
0.804 ±0.086
0.0000 ±0.0073
0.0022 ±0.0073
0.0013 ±0.0049
0.0076 ±0.0024
0.0016 ±0.0005
0.0103 ±0.0010
0.0001 ±0.0004
0.0009 ±0.0007
0.0092 ±0.0006
0.0002 ±0.0002
0.0001 ±0.0001
0.0007 ±0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0274 ±0.0021
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0003 ±0.0003
0.0003 ±0.0002
0.0025 ±0.0007
0.0007 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.0004 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0012 ±0.0007
0.0002 ±0.0008
0.0012 ±0.0010
0.0011 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0005 ±0.0008
0.0004 ±0.0010
0.0008 ±0.0010
0.0014 ±0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0057
0.0005 ±0.0011
0.0004 ± 0.0004
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0004 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.00 ±0.00
0.02 ±0.00
37.62 ±8.28
59.95 ±6.26
25.62 ±2.89
15.31 ±2.28
6.59 ±0.86
9.92 ±1.31
1.03 ±0.42
1.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±11. 03
0.00 ±2.91
0.00±1.10
0.00 ±0.04
1.06 ±0.11
0.20 ±0.04
1.19±0.20
0.86 ±0.08
0.02 ±0.04
0.53 ±0.07
0.56 ±0.08
0.64 ±0.09
0.15 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.04
1.41 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.27
2.31 ±0.25
W1-1
113.12±5.66
4.799 ±1.228
0.370 ±0.130
7.742 ±1.999
0.059 ±0.049
14.094 ±2.406
0.1497 ±0.0394
0.0323 ±0.0366
0.0884 ±0.0253
0.3956 ±0.0252
0.2364 ±0.0122
2.8849 ±0.1469
0.0304 ±0.0026
0.0076 ±0.0034
0.1876 ±0.0097
0.0019 ±0.0012
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0170 ±0.0020
0.0057 ±0.0052
0.6778 ±0.0352
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0037 ±0.0014
0.0118±0.0014
0.1230 ±0.0071
0.0000 ±0.0045
0.0051 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0509 ±0.0029
0.0001 ±0.0013
0.0002 ±0.0026
0.0000 ±0.0017
0.0000 ±0.0035
0.0027 ±0.0040
0.0025 ±0.0050
0.0022 ±0.0039
0.0000 ±0.0053
0.0000 ±0.0042
0.0011 ±0.0051
0.0028 ±0.0051
0.0054 ±0.0120
0.0055 ±0.0286
0.0002 ±0.0055
0.0004 ±0.0021
0.0001 ±0.0039
0.0684 ±0.0051
0.0026 ±0.0052
0.07 ±0.01
8.40 ± 0.45
9410.47 ±956.87
5346.25 ±577.52
1217.18±166.27
1396.61 ±167.69
2129. 17 ±257.46
585.96 ±68.46
1090.95 ±145.82
0.00 ±25.99
247.43 ± 30.39
132.75 ±14.09
51. 04 ±5.65
240.31 ±21.07
47.68 ±3.65
174.90 ±25.29
184.48 ±14.76
5.57 ±0.73
112.28±12.31
141.28±15.64
29.15±4.31
68.65 ±7.90
26.37 ±4.30
477.44±51.17
57.97 ±5.31
256.67 ±26.32
W1-2
43.21 ±2.17
0.886 ±0.247
2.526 ±0.888
1.609 ±0.397
0.035 ±0.026
10.008 ±2. 132
0.0044 ± 0.0330
0.0000 ±0.0324
0.0520 ±0.0223
0.0641 ±0.0039
0.4669 ± 0.0240
0.0118±0.0019
0.0002 ±0.0030
0.1276 ±0.0067
0.0004 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0023 ±0.0016
0.0004 ± 0.0046
0.1231 ±0.0094
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0011 ±0.0012
0.0013±0.0011
0.0295 ±0.0034
0.0016 ±0.0040
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0154 ±0.0014
0.0004 ±0.0011
0.0007 ±0.0023
0.0004 ±0.0015
0.0014 ±0.0031
0.0002 ±0.0036
0.0008 ±0.0045
0.0000 ±0.0035
0.0000 ±0.0048
0.0008 ±0.0037
0.0002 ±0.0045
0.0024 ± 0.0046
0.0000 ±0.0107
0.0089 ±0.0256
0.0000 ±0.0049
0.0000 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0035
0.0048 ±0.0033
0.0006 ±0.0046
0.02 ±0.01
0.98 ±0.05
12495.84 ±1280.70
6622.75 ±720.47
1439.55 ±197.47
1156.44±139.68
362.92 ±42.70
551. 67 ±74.09
0.00 ±23. 19
46.04 ± 6.42
52. 10 ±5.81
156.27 ±13.85
29. 19 ±2.27
79.22 ±11. 52
86.46 ±7.02
3.37 ±0.46
52.58 ±5.81
62.35 ±6.96
12.75 ±1.91
26.42 ±3.07
11. 35 ±1.87
189.69 ±19.62
W1-3
59.60 ±2.99
3. 168 ±0.810
0.040 ±0.030
34.087 ±2.917
4.826 ±1.026
0.170 ±0.103
0.0067 ±0.0341
0.0112±0.0337
0.3477 ±0.0296
0.0572 ±0.0036
0.6226 ±0.0318
0.0558 ±0.0034
0.0027 ±0.0031
0.1277 ±0.0068
0.0014 ±0.0011
0.0004 ± 0.0004
0.0088 ±0.0018
0.0062 ±0.0048
0.4376 ±0.0233
0.0004 ±0.0008
0.0032 ±0.0013
0.0129 ±0.0013
0.0594 ± 0.0044
0.0012 ±0.0042
0.0005 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0164 ±0.0015
0.0001 ±0.0012
0.0009 ±0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0015
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0005 ±0.0037
0.0044 ± 0.0047
0.0017 ±0.0036
0.0000 ±0.0049
0.0000 ±0.0039
0.0000 ±0.0047
0.0026 ±0.0048
0.0068 ±0.01 11
0.0059 ±0.0264
0.0000 ±0.0051
0.0000 ±0.0019
0.0001 ±0.0036
0.0457 ± 0.0042
0.0000 ±0.0048
0.03 ±0.01
1.11 ±0.06
16274.70 ±1652. 13
9824. 14 ±1059.65
1964.00 ±267.90
2283.57 ±273.84
778.60 ±90.85
1260.23 ±168.31
0.00 ±26.09
139.50 ±14.66
53.73 ±5.94
338.39 ±29.61
61. 26 ±4.68
255.01 ±36.82
235.86 ±18.83
7.73 ±1.00
144.41 ±15.80
171.02±18.91
30. 19 ±4.47
74.02 ±8.51
28.71 ±4.68
290.88 ±29.78
W2-1
52.30 ±2.63
11. 534 ±1.330
9.862 ±1.459
0.004 ±0.027
25.693 ±1.956
5.015±1.247
0.075 ±0.047
0.0000 ±0.0324
0.0000 ±0.0323
0.0151 ±0.0220
0.0211 ±0.0023
0.1011 ±0.0063
0.0111 ±0.0019
0.0022 ±0.0030
0.0650 ±0.0038
0.0019 ±0.0010
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0032 ±0.0016
0.0006 ±0.0046
0.0430 ±0.0073
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0005 ±0.0012
0.0026 ±0.0011
0.0240 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0040
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0021 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0004 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0015
0.0007 ±0.0031
0.0002 ±0.0036
0.0029 ±0.0045
0.0014 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0047
0.0023 ±0.0037
0.0075 ±0.0045
0.0008 ±0.0046
0.0102 ±0.0107
0.0110±0.0255
0.0029 ±0.0049
0.0000 ±0.0019
0.0018 ±0.0035
0.0082 ±0.0033
0.0033 ±0.0046
0.01 ±0.01
0.12 ±0.01
18396. 17±1875.71
10660.97±1154.41
2213. 12 ±302.60
2525.65 ±303.83
586. 16 ±68.65
45.40 ±35.31
218.78 ±22.08
50.78 ±5.64
54.17±4.17
410.19±59.34
222.65 ±17.90
6.47 ±0.85
135.59 ±14.90
160.59 ±17.82
24.81 ±3.68
87.29 ±10.08
26.74 ±4.37
82. 10 ±7.35
458.55 ±47. 11
W2-2
15.30 ±0.80
1.198±0.190
0.133 ±0.054
0.811 ±0.225
0.063 ±0.036
0.0798 ±0.0343
0.0026 ±0.0328
0.0878 ±0.0229
0.0811 ±0.0046
1.3880 ±0.0702
0.0151 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0031
0.0686 ±0.0040
0.0003 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0025 ±0.0017
0.0000 ±0.0047
0.0356 ±0.0073
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0007 ±0.0012
0.0015±0.0011
0.0281 ±0.0034
0.0002 ±0.0041
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0004 ±0.0012
0.0006 ±0.0011
0.0002 ±0.0023
0.0002 ±0.0015
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0022 ±0.0037
0.0009 ±0.0045
0.0009 ±0.0035
0.0028 ±0.0048
0.0017 ±0.0038
0.0000 ±0.0046
0.0000 ±0.0046
0.0043 ±0.0108
0.0000 ±0.0258
0.0000 ±0.0050
0.0000 ±0.0019
0.0003 ±0.0035
0.0003 ±0.0034
0.0013 ±0.0047
0.02 ±0.01
2.13±0.11
1686.84 ±173.50
764.52 ±83.51
185.05 ±25.65
177.23±21.52
28.08 ±3.63
0.00 ±26.09
2.48 ±3.06
11. 30 ±1.28
5.20 ±0.43
25.38 ±3.73
20.23 ±1.66
0.49 ±0.14
1 1 .44 ± 1 .06
13.29 ±1.49
13.93 ±1.58
1.84 ±0.31
3. 19 ±0.40
1.46 ±0.29
66.40 ±7.25
16.64 ±2.03
W2-3
5.98 ±0.32
0.516 ±0.048
0.599 ±0.094
0.071 ±0.022
1.257 ±0.200
1.436±0.146
0.039 ±0.016
5. 158 ±0.320
0.0093 ±0.0149
0.0059 ±0.0147
0.0180 ±0.0100
0.0717 ±0.0061
0.0250 ±0.0016
0.1161 ±0.0061
0.0153±0.0011
0.0033 ±0.0014
0.0721 ±0.0037
0.0008 ±0.0005
0.0002 ±0.0002
0.0069 ±0.0008
0.0010 ±0.0021
0.0922 ±0.0056
0.0002 ±0.0004
0.0022 ±0.0006
0.0056 ±0.0006
0.0345 ±0.0022
0.0006 ±0.0018
0.0002 ±0.0005
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0005 ±0.0005
0.0002 ±0.0005
0.0004 ±0.0010
0.0004 ±0.0007
0.0019 ±0.0014
0.0015 ±0.0016
0.0033 ±0.0020
0.0003 ±0.0016
0.0004 ±0.0022
0.0007 ±0.0017
0.0032 ±0.0021
0.0023 ±0.0021
0.0070 ±0.0049
0.0057±0.0116
0.0008 ±0.0022
0.0003 ±0.0009
0.0001 ±0.0016
0.0024 ±0.0015
0.0002 ±0.0021
0.02 ±0.00
0.25 ±0.01
11540.78±1179.57
5654.05 ±613.61
997.31 ±136.70
992.13±119.61
264.79±31.12
0.00 ±25.43
114.80±17.92
46.04 ±6.55
45.47 ±5.06
118.98±10.51
21.61 ±1.67
133.32 ±19.34
81. 80 ±6.61
2.66 ±0.37
53.35 ±4.84
51. 64 ±5.69
61. 74 ±6.88
9. 46 ±1.42
24.31 ±2.82
8.50 ±1.41
1426.55 ±153.56
57. 19 ±5.31
B2-1
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description WO-1 WO-
Dibenzothiophene 0.17 ± 0.04 0.17 ±
Anthracene 0.01 ±0.02 1.79±
A-methylfluorene 1 .40 ±0.17 1 .36 ±
1-methylfluorene 0.98 ± 0.13 1.05 ±
B-methylfluorene 0.30 ± 0.07 0.31 ±
9-fluorenone 0.00 ± 0.07 0.00 ±
Acenaphthenequinone 2.58 ± 0.33 0.18 ±
Perinaphthenone 2.29 ± 0.35 5.68 ±
2-methylanthracene 1 .30 ± 0.14 1 .61 ±
3-methylphenanthrene 3.69 ± 0.28 3.94 ±
2-methylphenanthrene 4.60 ± 0.45 4.81 ±
9-methylphenanthrene 2.13 ± 0.21 1 .68 ±
1-methylphenanthrene 3.73 ± 0.63 6.48 ±
Anthrone 0.04 ±0.03 0.56 ±
Anthraquinone 3.52 ± 0.45 3.41 ±
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene 1 .73 ±0.18 1 .76 ±
A-dimethylphenanthrene 1 .69 ± 0.18 2.56 ±
B-dimethylphenanthrene 1 .40 ±0.16 1 .71 ±
C-dimethylphenanthrene 3.93 ± 0.33 3.49 ±
D-dimethylphenanthrene 1 .27 ± 0.14 0.96 ±
1 ,7-dimethylphenanthrene 2.39 ± 0.20 2.18 ±
E-dimethylphenanthrene 1 .69 ±0.16 1 .52 ±
9-methylanthracene 0.21 ± 0.05 0.00 ±
Fluoranthene 21. 16 ±1.60 18.53 ±
9-Anthraaldehyde 1 .17 ± 0.31 0.72 ±
Retene 0.23 ±0.06 0.00 ±
Benzonaphthothiophene 0.04 ± 0.06 0.01 ±
1+3-methylfluoranthene 1 .90 ± 0.24 1 .95 ±
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py 2.84 ± 0.28 2.28 ±
C-MePy/MeFI 2.73 ± 0.21 2.92 ±
D-MePy/MeFI 2.01 ± 0.24 1 .36 ±
4-methylpyrene 1 .96 ± 0.21 1 .31 ±
1-methylpyrene 3.27 ± 0.31 1 .62 ±
Benzo(c)phenanthrene 1 .89 ± 0.25 1 .36 ±
Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene 8.83 ± 0.69 18.96 ±
Benz(a)anthracene 4.19 ± 0.48 3.63 ±
Triphenylene 0.66 ± 0.06 0.30 ±
Chrysene 5.72 ±0.39 3.80 ±
Benzanthrone 2.38 ± 0.38 1 .52 ±
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
3-methylchrysene 0.27 ± 0.04 0.16 ±
Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione 0.52 ± 0.10 0.38 ±
5+6-methylchrysene 0.09 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene 1 .40 ± 0.26 0.47 ±
Benzo(a)fluoranthene 0.14 ± 0.04 0.03 ±
BeP 0.60 ±0.07 0.33 ±
BaP 0.44 ±0.10 0.02 ±
Perylene 0.01 ±0.03 0.02 ±
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Dibenzo(a jjanthracene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
lndeno[1 23-cd]pyrene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Benzo(b)chrysene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Picene 0.00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.13 ± 0.10 0.00 ±
Anthanthrene 0.01 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
Coronene 0.17 ± 0.04 0.00 ±
Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene 0.00 ± 0.03 0.00 ±
WO-3 WO-4 WO-S WO-6 W1-1 W1-2 W1-3 W2-1 W2-2 W2-3
07 0.15 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.04 0.07 ±
26
18
15
09
08
08
77
18
31
48
18
09
14
49
20
28
20
30
13
19
15
07
.43
20
09
13
26
24
24
18
16
17
19
.62
49
07
28
26
07
07
10
07
17
07
08
21
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
23
07
07
07
07
07
97 ±0.14 0.71 ±
71 ±0.10 1.59±
67 ±0.09 1.28±
20 ±0.06 0.42 ±
58 ±0.33 0.64 ±
21 ±0.06 1.31 ±
.24 ±1.50 6.23 ±
51 ±0.07 1.09±
09 ±0.17 3.37 ±
74 ±0.28 4.26 ±
98±0.10 1.92±
85 ±0.48 5.40 ±
14 ±0.05 0.05 ±
15 ±0.94 6.68 ±
68 ±0.08 1.66±
61 ±0.18 2.00±
68±0.09 1.12±
53 ±0.14 3.70 ±
60±0.08 1.19±
93 ±0.09 2.16±
82 ±0.08 1.97±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
.69±1.34 32.12±
68 ±0.45 3.45 ±
15 ±0.06 0.27 ±
02 ±0.07 0.02 ±
56 ±0.20 2.29 ±
62 ±0.16 2.68 ±
24±0.10 2.14±
33±0.16 1.94±
11 ±0.13 1.93±
89 ±0.09 5.86 ±
68 ±0.09 0.81 ±
49 ±0.43 3.94 ±
59 ±0.24 2.69 ±
09 ±0.04 0.53 ±
70 ±0.18 3.63 ±
48 ±0.40 2.29 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
15 ±0.04 0.20 ±
50±0.11 0.57±
01 ±0.04 0.03 ±
60 ±0.70 0.49 ±
15 ±0.05 0.00 ±
16 ±0.14 0.48 ±
98 ±0.15 0.07 ±
22 ±0.05 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.13 0.07 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
09 ±0.04 0.06 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
11 0.96±0.14 1.48±
19
16
08
14
17
81
12
26
42
19
91
04
86
18
22
13
31
14
18
18
04
.42
90
07
07
29
26
17
24
21
56
11
29
35
05
25
37
04
04
12
04
13
04
06
12
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
13
04
04
04
04
04
46 ±0.18 0.58 ±
01 ±0.13 0.44 ±
22 ±0.06 0.18±
00 ±0.06 0.08 ±
76±0.11 0.77±
08 ±0.41 2.10±
91 ±0.10 0.68±
20±0.25 1.71 ±
28 ±0.42 2.05 ±
62 ±0.17 0.90 ±
85 ±0.65 2.09 ±
88±0.19 0.14±
12±0.45 1.04±
59 ±0.17 0.50 ±
93 ±0.21 0.99 ±
60 ±0.08 0.61 ±
27±0.28 1.15±
07 ±0.12 0.41 ±
87 ±0.16 0.78 ±
41 ±0.13 0.50±
09 ±0.04 0.00 ±
.22±1.45 12.45±
32 ±0.10 0.34 ±
00 ±0.05 0.05 ±
02 ±0.07 0.00 ±
61 ±0.21 0.95 ±
90±0.19 1.16±
84±0.15 1.36±
53 ±0.19 0.85 ±
34 ±0.15 0.77 ±
97 ±0.57 0.77 ±
14±0.15 1.12±
.65 ±0.96 12.32 ±
75 ±0.36 1.86±
48 ±0.05 0.89 ±
90 ±0.26 3.32 ±
99 ±0.32 2.25 ±
02 ±0.04 0.00 ±
16±0.04 0.13±
45 ±0.10 0.48 ±
02 ±0.04 0.02 ±
01 ±0.18 0.51 ±
08 ±0.04 0.04 ±
53 ±0.06 0.36 ±
04 ±0.12 0.02 ±
05 ±0.04 0.00 ±
19 ±0.09 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.13 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
07 ±0.04 0.09 ±
01 ±0.04 0.00 ±
04 7.88 ± 0.95 5.43 ± 0.66 6.80 ± 0.82 6.41 ± 0.78 1 .31 ± 0.21 5.14 ± 0.63
21 217.94
09 132.39
07 68.03
05 25.52
05 152.32
t 29.59 124.71 ± 17.01 197.89 ± 26.84 454.31 ± 61.75 13.84 ±1.90 196.90 ± 26.81
1 14.36 55.35 ± 6.07 141.57 ± 15.34 119.47 ± 13.01
t 7.81 36.27 ± 4.20 74.95 ± 8.60 72.59 ± 8.36
1 4.76 12.09 ± 2.27 36.01 ± 6.71 20.98 ± 3.93
1 17.50 153.41 ± 17.74 68.22 ± 7.87 131.37 ± 15.14
1 1 20.66 ± 2.61 0.00 ± 0.14 30.06 ± 3.76 31 .93 ± 4.00
29 186.86
08 79.93
14 190.22
22 198.55
10 86.12
36 104.70
05
19 1
07
11
08
10
06
07
06
04
.94 1
10
05
07
13
12
11
11
09
08
15
.03 1
23
08
23
37
04
04
10
04
14
04
05
12
04
04
04
04
04 7
04
04
04
13 2
04
04
04
04 8
04
83 ±
.24
.94
.59
.40
.89
.76
.12
.83
74 ±
t 33.67 58.23 ± 10.54 180.46 ± 32.50 88.60 ± 16.00
t 8.06 31.07 ± 3.17 72.17 ± 7.27 86.59 ± 8.76
1 14.04 72.26 ± 5.43 146.84 ± 10.81 171.85 ± 12.76
1 18.67 80.02 ± 7.62 155.75 ± 14.63 184.04 ± 17.37
t 8.61 37.61 ± 3.80 79.54 ± 7.94 108.07 ± 10.83
1 17.65 45.80 ± 7.75 78.98 ± 13.31 103.60 ± 17.48
1 .46 1 .53 ± 0.37 3.85 ± 0.84 4.22 ± 0.92
1 17.83 44.19 ± 6.20 82.23 ±11.38 95.57 ± 13.24
t 3.19 1 1 .85 ± 1 .25 20.85 ± 2.16 23.83 ± 2.47
1 4.80 15.79 ± 1 .72 28.98 ± 3.12 32.97 ± 3.56
t 2.88 1 1 .07 ± 1 .27 17.26 ± 1 .96 19.22 ± 2.18
t 5.96 23.22 ± 1 .96 48.04 ± 3.98 50.43 ± 4.21
t 2.17 6.38 ± 0.72 10.61 ±1.17 13.67 ±1.51
t 3.37 14.65 ± 1 .22 32.83 ± 2.68 23.02 ± 1 .90
t2.46 9.61 ±0.90 18.41 ±1.69 17.86 ±1.65
0.63 2.03 ± 0.36 5.38 ± 0.89 6.41 ± 1 .05
.61 ± 14.28 146.04 ± 1 1 .22 183.33 ± 13.85 442.87 ± 33.68
01 ± 1 .09 1 .14 ± 0.35 1 .15 ± 0.35 1 .70 ± 0.49
35 ±
00 i
.57
0.31 0.71 ± 0.22 0.97 ± 0.26 0.59 ± 0.23
0.26 0.00 ± 0.26 0.18 ± 0.26 0.00 ± 0.28
t 2.45 8.15 ± 1.09 13.69 ±1.80 15.86 ± 2.10
.45 ± 1 .87 9.24 ± 0.95 15.80 ± 1 .60 17.40 ± 1 .77
.54 ± 2.41 9.16 ± 0.77 21 .75 ± 1 .77 36.37 ± 2.98
.70
.99
.12
.92
.34
.16
00
.75
00
80
88
07
73
.07
19
.79
.41
81
00
00
95
90
88
36
71
.06
.83
00
.16
48
00
nitro-PAH (ua/milel
t 2.48 8.05 ± 1 .02 13.02 ± 1 .64 13.65 ± 1 .73
1 1 .90 7.26 ± 0.83 12.34 ± 1 .38 14.55 ± 1 .63
t1.56 5.92 ±0.59 12.21 ±1.18 14.70 ±1.43
1 1 .67 5.50 ± 0.79 8.42 ±1.18 17.71 ± 2.47
12.49 90.54 ± 7.98 136.15 ± 11.84 208.93 ± 18.28
8.44 17.55 ± 2.55 38.02 ± 5.44 74.79 ± 10.68
0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
5.48 18.70 ±1.57 39.89 ± 3.28 86.44 ± 7.13
0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
1 .03 0.00 ± 0.13 0.54 ± 0.34 1 .00 ± 0.59
0.93 1 .99 ± 0.25 4.37 ± 0.48 6.67 ± 0.71
1 .82 2.50 ± 0.53 6.95 ± 1 .40 3.58 ± 0.74
1 .31 0.00 ±0.13 1 .23 ± 0.25 1 .81 ± 0.34
6.09 8.17 ± 1.85 13.35 ± 2.95 89.15 ± 19.13
0.67 0.59 ± 0.18 1.73 ± 0.39 10.60 ± 2.17
4.33 12.25 ± 1 .38 31 .08 ± 3.46 38.59 ± 4.32
4.60 11. 66 ±1.19 49.88 ±4.73 66.81 ±6.36
1 .66 2.55 ± 0.50 6.87 ± 1 .29 12.75 ± 2.39
0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 5.69 ±1.61
0.13 0.00 ±0.13 0.00 ±0.13 0.24 ±0.14
1 .37 0.83 ± 0.21 3.06 ± 0.61 2.88 ± 0.59
15.05 14.23 ± 2.78 44.22 ± 8.55 83.67 ± 16.18
0.52 0.38 ± 0.14 1 .02 ± 0.19 3.57 ± 0.48
0.52 0.27 ±0.15 1 .31 ± 0.32 2.67 ± 0.59
1 .23 0.47 ±0.16 1 .35 ± 0.28 3.78 ± 0.70
26.82 50.43 ± 6.71 127.86 ± 16.88 165.40 ± 21.88
2.16 4.43 ± 0.67 14.52 ± 2.1 1 31 .01 ± 4.51
0.56 0.56 ± 0.15 3.20 ± 0.45 5.34 ± 0.73
2.22 2.58 ± 0.49 10.31 ± 1 .89 11 .50 ± 2.10
1 1 .02 23.06 ± 3.06 79.19 ± 10.44 70.27 ± 9.29
0.13 0.99 ± 0.16 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
.16±1.80 55.84±6.11
.07±1.42 35.91 ±4.16
71 ±0.91 12.31 ±2.31
.52 ±3.94 132. 15 ±15.26
86 ±0.21 0.00 ±0.15
.53±2.12 71.66±12.95
29 ±0.27 23.06 ±2.35
.81 ±1.21 55.87±4.18
.83 ±1.82 62.69 ±5.96
32 ±0.56 35.90 ±3.62
63 ±1.64 36.64 ±6.20
00±0.13 1.23 ±0.31
.16±4.83 88.24±12.25
18 ±0.27 6.99 ±0.75
02 ±0.36 9.89 ±1.08
74 ±0.34 6.49 ±0.75
35±0.32 15.78 ±1.33
24 ±0.20 4.69 ±0.54
00 ±0.21 9.54 ±0.80
71 ±0.21 6.52 ±0.62
00±0.13 1.42
.82 ±3.40 258.94
08 ±0.14 0.69
24 ±0.19 0.39
00 ±0.26 0.00
24 ±0.33 8.91
55 ±0.29 8.91
18 ±0.22 14.91
94 ±0.28 7.64
38 ±0.20 7.14
79 ±0.15 5.78
70 ±0.41 7.55
.71 ±2.98 107.82
23±0.85 31.01
00 ±0.13 0.00
84 ±0.76 36.14
00 ±0.13 0.00
00 ±0.13 0.00
45 ±0.14 2.07
53 ±0.34 2.47
06 ±0.13 0.70
.61 ±2.37 28.79
97 ±0.63 5.37
69 ±0.33 20.26
42 ±0.44 37.82
65 ±0.34 7.12
00 ±0.13 0.00
00 ±0.13 0.00
00±0.13 1.54
55 ±0.53 36.33
00±0.13 1.38
00 ±0.13 0.86
00±0.13 1.53
25 ±0.49 63.34
00 ±0.13 12.94
28 ±0.14 3.62
00 ±0.13 6.37
34 ±0.46 28.51
00 ±0.13 0.00
.29
19.78
.25
.20
.28
.19
.91
1.24
.98
.81
.58
.06
9.47
4.45
.14
3.00
.14
.14
.26
.52
.18
6.26
.11
2.28
3.63
.35
.14
.14
.34
7.04
.24
.24
.32
8.41
1.90
.51
.17
3.78
.14
1-nitronaphthalene 0.0000 ± 0.0023 0.0157 ± 0.0039 0.0043 ± 0.0029 0.0002 ± 0.0023 0.0000 ± 0.0021 0.0000 ± 0.0025 0.9942 ± 0.0903 0.2246 ± 0.0228 0.5651 ± 0.0524 0.2109 ± 0.0216 0.2146 ± 0.0220 0.1401 ± 0.0155
2-nitronaphthalene 0.0050 ± 0.0028 0.0036 ± 0.0030 0.0017 ± 0.0027 0.0076 ± 0.0032 0.0000 ± 0.0016 0.0000 ± 0.0019 2.1823 ±
2-nitrobiphenyl 0.0046 ± 0.0010 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0002 ± 0.0003 0.0003 ± 0.0004 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0971 ±
3-nitrobiphenyl 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0035 ± 0.0007 0.0013 ± 0.0004 0.0001 ± 0.0002 0.0016 ± 0.0004 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0803 ±
4-nitrobiphenyl 0.0000 ± 0.0015 0.0000 ± 0.0013 0.0016 ± 0.0023 0.0000 ± 0.0014 0.0000 ± 0.0009 0.0000 ± 0.0018 0.1715 ±
2-nitrofluorene 0.0013 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0029 ± 0.0003 0.0002 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0001 ± 0.0001 0.0414 ±
1 ,3-dinitronaphthalene 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0129 ±
1 ,5-dinitronaphthalene 0.0001 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0009 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0042 ±
5-nitroacenaphthene 0.0000 ± 0.0004 0.0045 ± 0.001 1 0.0000 ± 0.0004 0.0020 ± 0.0006 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ±
9-nitroanthracene 0.0334 ± 0.0052 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0072 ± 0.0012 0.0068 ± 0.0012 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0079 ± 0.0013 0.0000 ±
4-nitrophenanthrene 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0009 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 i
9-nitrophenanthrene 0.0031 ± 0.0004 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0026 ± 0.0003 0.0009 ± 0.0001 0.0013 ± 0.0002 0.0004 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ±
1 ,8-dinitronaphthalene 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0067 ±
2-nitrofluoranthene 0.0075 ± 0.0008 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0116 ± 0.0013 0.0101 ± 0.0011 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0120 ± 0.0012 0.0000 ±
3-nitrofluoranthene 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0002 ± 0.0001 0.0024 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.1 195 ±
1-nitropyrene 0.0214 ± 0.0026 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0154 ± 0.0019 0.0110 ± 0.0012 0.0154 ± 0.0019 0.0034 ± 0.0005 0.4422 ±
7-nitrobenzo(a)anthracene 0.0020 ± 0.0004 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0011 ± 0.0003 0.0185 ± 0.0025 0.0016 ± 0.0004 0.0002 ± 0.0001 0.1138 ±
0.271 1 0.5336 ± 0.0687 1 .1204 ± 0.1403 0.4881 ± 0.0630 0.4300 ± 0.0560 0.2443 ± 0.0331
0.0167 0.0181 ± 0.0034 0.0757 ± 0.0131 0.0204 ± 0.0038 0.0121 ± 0.0024 0.0085 ± 0.0019
0.0136 0.0166 ± 0.0030 0.0308 ± 0.0053 0.0191 ± 0.0034 0.0177 ± 0.0031 0.0128 ± 0.0023
0.0320 0.0432 ± 0.0100 0.1037 ± 0.0203 0.0959 ± 0.0191 0.0609 ± 0.0130 0.0079 ± 0.0045
0.0037 0.0261 ± 0.0024 0.0167 ± 0.0016 0.0081 ± 0.0009 0.0038 ± 0.0005 0.0085 ± 0.0009
0.0021 0.0000 ± 0.0009 0.0000 ± 0.0009 0.0000 ± 0.0008 0.0065 ± 0.0016 0.0013 ± 0.0012
0.0006 0.0007 ± 0.0002 0.0026 ± 0.0004 0.0124 ± 0.0018 0.0013 ± 0.0003 0.0047 ± 0.0007
0.0010 0.0182 ± 0.0030 0.0336 ± 0.0045 0.0153 ± 0.0028 0.0049 ± 0.0018 0.0004 ± 0.0016
0.0002 0.0395 ± 0.0066 0.0265 ± 0.0045 0.0204 ± 0.0035 0.3047 ± 0.0500 0.0440 ± 0.0074
0.0001 0.0024 ± 0.0003 0.0034 ± 0.0004 0.0014 ± 0.0002 0.0015 ± 0.0002 0.0277 ± 0.0024
0.0001 0.0036 ± 0.0006 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0043 ± 0.0007 0.0091 ± 0.0014 0.0244 ± 0.0037
0.001 1 0.0352 ± 0.0044 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0047 ± 0.0008 0.0027 ± 0.0006
0.0003 0.0513 ± 0.0057 0.0851 ± 0.0093 0.0394 ± 0.0045 0.0359 ± 0.0041 0.0412 ± 0.0047
0.0085 0.0199 ± 0.0015 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0102 ± 0.0008 0.0787 ± 0.0057
0.0536 0.1245 ± 0.0154 0.2797 ± 0.0340 0.1133 ± 0.0140 0.4616 ± 0.0563 0.0362 ± 0.0047
0.0152 0.0675 ± 0.0092 0.0686 ± 0.0093 0.0500 ± 0.0069 0.1032 ± 0.0139 0.0478 ± 0.0066
6-nitrochrysene 0.0007 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0003 ± 0.0001 0.0165 ± 0.0026 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0404 ± 0.0064 0.0088 ± 0.0014 0.0349 ± 0.0055 0.0250 ± 0.0040 0.0122 ± 0.0020 0.0078 ± 0.0013
B2-2
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description WO-1 WO -2 WO -3 WO -4 WO-S WO -6 W1 -1 W1 -2 W1 -3 W2-1 W2-2 W2-3
6-nitrobenz[a]pyrene 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0336 ± 0.0029 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0082 ± 0.0007 0.0178 ± 0.0015
18a(H),21&(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane &
17a(H),21&(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),21li(H)-Hopane
17R(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-17a(H),21R(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30-Homohopane
17li(H),21li(H>Hopane
22S-17a(H),21R(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22R-17a(H),21R(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22S-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31,32-Trisomohop
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31,32-Trishomoho
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14IJ(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H>cholestane
ster45440(cholestane)
C28-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H>ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan
C29-20R5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-stigmastan
C29-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-stigmastan
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan
Alkanes (uq/milej
Dodecane
Tridecane
Notfarnesane
Heptylcyclohexane
Tetradecane
Octylcyclohexane
Nonylcyclohexane
Hexadecane
Norpristane
Heptadecane
Decylcyclohexane
Heptadecane_Pristane
Undecylcyclohexane
Octadecane
Phytane
Dodecylcyclohexane
Nonadecane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Eicosane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Heneicosane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Docosane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Tricosane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Tetracosane
Pentacosane
Nonadecylcyclohexane
Hexacosane
Eicosylcyclohexane
Heptacosane
Heneicosylcyclohexane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Triacontane
Hentriacontane
Dotriacontane
Tritriacontane
Tetratriacontane
Rental riacontane
Hexatriacontane
Hept at riacontane
Octatriacontane
Nonatriacontane
Polar compounds fug/mile)
heptanoic acid (c7)
me-malonic (d-c3)
guaiacol
octa^oic^cid (c8)
phenylacetic acid
maleic acid
succinic acid (d-c4)
22 ±0.03 0.07 ±
06 ±0.05 0.04 ±
24 ±0.05 0.02 ±
00 ±0.03 0.01 ±
12 ±0.03 0.04 ±
08 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.01 ±
01 ±0.03 0.00 ±
07 ±0.03 0.04 ±
05 ±0.03 0.02 ±
01 ±0.03 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
01 ±0.03 0.00 ±
06 ±0.03 0.02 ±
02 ±0.03 0.03 ±
05 ±0.03 0.03 ±
04 ±0.03 0.05 ±
.89 ±6.29 7.88 ±
91 ±1.90 5.57±
50 ±1.06 0.00 ±
.39 ±0.19 0.63 ±
.26 ±1.80 7.25 ±
00 ±0.10 0.20 ±
00 ±0.09 0.50 ±
88 ±0.93 22.77 ±
00 ±0.04 1.61 ±
24 ±0.29 3.31 ±
78 ±0.15 0.00 ±
82 ±0.35 1.52±
54 ±0.16 0.08 ±
16±1.00 12.27±
61 ±0.52 1.21 ±
19 ±0.06 0.02 ±
07±0.31 1.66±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±1.36 0.00 ±
53 ±0.12 0.56 ±
85 ±0.31 2.72 ±
99 ±0.26 0.53 ±
00±1.32 2.19±
17±0.05 1.27±
89 ±0.32 1.89±
32 ±0.59 3.65 ±
20 ±0.05 0.37 ±
00±1.19 0.00±
04 ±0.44 0.17±
00 ±0.08 0.85 ±
00 ±0.39 0.00 ±
01 ±0.03 0.01 ±
00 ±0.18 0.33 ±
02 ±0.03 0.02 ±
47 ±0.51 0.00 ±
28 ±0.13 0.64 ±
39 ±0.35 0.00 ±
00 ±0.06 0.00 ±
08 ±0.15 0.35 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
25 ±0.13 0.44 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
16±0.12 0.48±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
17 ±0.09 0.23 ±
00 ±0.03 0.00 ±
47 ±1.37 0.00 ±
39±0.11 0.00±
9.00 ±0.03 -99.00 ±
00 ±1.33 0.00 ±
33 ±0.23 1.47±
00 ±0.12 0.00 ±
00 ±0.23 0.00 ±
07
08
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
79
02
38
.26
41
30
28
.70
19
40
08
24
13
.84
41
07
23
08
92
14
32
26
82
26
42
88
10
54
64
27
53
07
31
07
73
26
56
14
27
09
26
09
24
07
16
07
11
18
0.07
57
63
21
41
.00 ±0.04 0.10 ±0.04
.04 ±0.05 0.01 ±0.04
.18±0.06 0.15±0.05
.01 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.05 ±0.04 0.03 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.02 ±0.04 0.02 ±0.04
.01 ±0.04 0.01 ±0.04
.01 ±0.04 0.03 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.04 0.03 ±0.04
.01 ±0.04 0.02 ±0.04
.04 ±0.04 0.02 ±0.04
.01 ±0.04 0.04 ±0.04
.02 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.22 ±4.48 14.38 ±6.06
.18±1.80 8.16 ±2.21
.00 ±0.46 0.80 ±0.63
.31 ±0.19 0.85 ±0.28
.16±0.86 5.08±1.16
.17±0.21 0.00±0.15
.00±0.09 0.18±0.18
.14 ±0.84 8.73 ±0.97
.28±0.15 1.96±0.20
.37 ±0.25 2.04 ±0.29
.08 ±0.06 0.12 ±0.06
.34 ±0.21 1.64 ±0.24
.25 ±0.11 0.43±0.14
.00 ±0.99 0.00 ±0.99
.45 ±0.39 1.75 ±0.42
.17 ±0.06 0.40 ±0.09
.19 ±0.25 2.66 ±0.28
.14 ±0.07 0.00 ±0.04
.00±1.18 0.00±1.19
.11 ±0.06 0.43 ±0.11
.59 ±0.30 3.69 ±0.38
.26 ±0.17 0.91 ±0.27
.00±1.19 0.00 ±1.01
.12 ±0.05 0.05 ±0.04
.37 ±0.34 1.60 ±0.33
.04 ±0.74 0.00 ±0.08
.11 ±0.04 0.12±0.04
.00 ±1.08 0.00 ±1.02
.00 ±0.49 0.33 ±0.49
.23±0.16 0.19±0.14
.00 ±0.35 0.00 ±0.31
.02 ±0.04 0.02 ±0.04
.00±0.19 0.00±0.19
.02 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.40 0.00 ±0.40
.31 ±0.13 0.21 ±0.13
.00 ±0.30 0.00 ±0.30
.00 ±0.09 0.00 ±0.08
.00±0.13 0.00±0.13
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.12 0.04 ±0.12
.00 ±0.05 0.00 ±0.05
.00±0.10 0.00±0.10
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±0.08 0.00 ±0.07
.00 ±0.04 0.00 ±0.04
.00 ±1.07 0.00 ±0.93
.11 ±0.08 0.00±0.06
9.00 ±0.04 -99.00 ±0.04
.00 ±1.34 0.00 ±1.49
.22±0.28 1.16±0.39
.00±0.16 0.00±0.11
.00 ±0.23 0.00 ±0.24
16±0.04 0.10±
02 ±0.05 0.00 ±
11 ±0.05 0.21 ±
04 ±0.04 0.00 ±
05 ±0.04 0.00 ±
04 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.02 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±0.04 0.02 ±
04 ±0.04 0.05 ±
01 ±0.04 0.03 ±
00 ±0.04 0.03 ±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
01 ±0.04 0.00 ±
02 ±0.04 0.01 ±
02 ±0.04 0.03 ±
02 ±0.04 0.04 ±
02 ±0.04 0.04 ±
01 ±0.04 0.00 ±
90 ±5.07 1.50±
.52 ±2.72 0.81 ±
00 ±0.49 0.00 ±
.71 ±0.25 0.03 ±
98±1.17 0.00±
31 ±0.23 0.00 ±
00 ±0.10 0.00 ±
.67±1.10 7.38±
51 ±0.09 0.70 ±
60 ±0.21 0.52 ±
39 ±0.10 0.00 ±
52 ±0.23 0.50 ±
31 ±0.12 0.06±
00±1.13 1.38±
92 ±0.45 0.54 ±
00 ±0.04 0.06 ±
17 ±0.24 0.74 ±
44 ±0.12 0.03 ±
00 ±1.26 0.00 ±
64±0.15 0.17±
34 ±0.36 2.52 ±
75 ±0.27 0.38 ±
00±1.15 0.72±
92 ±0.18 0.52 ±
44 ±0.48 4.53 ±
00 ±0.33 1.06±
10±0.04 0.12±
00±1.17 0.00±
30 ±0.55 0.00 ±
42 ±0.17 0.53 ±
00 ±0.34 0.00 ±
19 ±0.05 0.00 ±
00 ±0.20 0.00 ±
02 ±0.04 0.02 ±
00 ±0.45 0.00 ±
14±0.13 0.27±
00 ±0.36 0.00 ±
00 ±0.08 0.00 ±
00 ±0.16 0.00 ±
00 ±0.05 0.00 ±
27 ±0.16 0.20 ±
00 ±0.05 0.00 ±
07±0.12 0.13±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
15±0.10 0.23±
00 ±0.04 0.00 ±
00 ±1.30 0.00 ±
00 ±0.08 0.00 ±
9.00 ±0.04 -99.00 ±
00 ±1.52 0.41 ±
57 ±0.45 0.05 ±
00 ±0.12 0.00 ±
00 ±0.23 0.00 ±
04 19.74 ± 2.09 8.90 ± 0.96 5.21 ± 0.57 14.71 ± 1 .57 1 .83 ± 0.24 2.75 ± 0.32
05 18.07 ± 3.69 1 .53 ± 0.39 2.06 ± 0.49 7.63 ± 1 .60 0.00 ± 0.16 0.39 ± 0.21
05 55.34 ± 10.74 14.74 ± 2.89 8.97 ±1.77 27.42 ± 5.35 3.10 ± 0.64 4.44 ± 0.90
04 3.28 ± 0.88 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.13 0.20 ± 0.15
04 34.84 ± 4.40 14.80 ± 1 .89 9.76 ± 1 .25 23.57 ± 2.99 1 .1 1 ± 0.20 3.98 ± 0.53
04 25.08 ± 5.55 10.95 ± 2.44 10.71 ± 2.38 18.86 ±4.18 0.00 ± 0.13 3.00 ± 0.69
04 4.99 ± 0.94 0.00 ± 0.13 1.61 ± 0.32 5.88 ±1.10 0.00 ± 0.13 0.75 ± 0.19
04 17.76 ± 4.98 7.27 ± 2.06 3.78 ± 1 .09 12.94 ± 3.64 1 .35 ± 0.42 0.00 ± 0.14
04 1 1 .63 ± 1 .48 5.59 ± 0.73 3.07 ± 0.42 7.71 ± 1 .00 0.60 ±0.15 1 .46 ± 0.24
04 1 1 .25 ± 2.48 0.00 ±0.13 1 .98 ± 0.46 6.79 ± 1 .51 0.00 ± 0.13 0.43 ± 0.18
04 5.21 ± 0.95 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 4.18 ± 0.77 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
04 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
04 9.87 ± 2.57 0.00 ±0.13 1 .35 ± 0.40 1 .83 ± 0.51 0.35 ± 0.18 0.53 ± 0.22
04 1 1 .14 ± 2.22 1 .42 ± 0.32 1 .31 ± 0.30 2.52 ± 0.53 0.48 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.14
04 1 1 .67 ± 1 .79 1 .25 ± 0.24 1 .39 ± 0.26 2.37 ± 0.40 0.43 ± 0.15 0.34 ± 0.15
04 4.54 ±1.08 1.44 ± 0.37 0.00 ± 0.13 0.92 ± 0.26 0.49 ± 0.18 0.47 ± 0.18
04 6.1 1 ± 1 .67 0.50 ± 0.21 0.64 ± 0.24 0.86 ± 0.30 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.14
04 9.46 ± 2.25 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ±0.13 1.18 ± 0.32 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
04 6.68 ± 0.94 0.00 ± 0.13 2.22 ± 0.34 0.62 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
04 3.53 ± 0.68 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ±0.13 1.12 ± 0.25 0.41 ± 0.15 0.00 ± 0.14
04 6.75 ± 0.90 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 1.71 ± 0.27 0.32 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.14
04 10.74 ± 2.19 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 1.28 ± 0.29 0.28 ± 0.14 0.29 ± 0.15
04 0.00 ±0.13 1 .00 ± 0.25 1 .58 ± 0.36 1 .37 ± 0.33 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
18 139.28 ± 35.92 178.00 ±44.77 753.76 ± 176.78 254.17 ± 62.45 176.32 ±44.44 368.74 ± 88.76
45 133.98 ± 17.56 175.47 ± 22.56 244.21 ± 30.53 165.33 ± 21.38 141.27 ± 18.53 660.39 ± 80.25
30 161.83 ± 29.52 185.47 ± 33.79 53.54 ± 10.32 13.63 ± 3.37 25.20 ± 5.34 306.66 ± 55.35
69 330.51 ± 28.42 184.59 ± 16.61 469.86 ± 39.81 624.56 ± 52.96 31 .55 ± 4.1 1 253.13 ± 22.29
15 10.48 ± 2.61 0.00 ± 0.54 7.39 ±1.99 18.35 ±4.20 0.00 ± 0.42 0.00 ± 0.31
15 2.90 ± 0.88 7.12 ± 1.64 0.00 ± 0.27 9.91 ± 2.17 0.15 ± 0.43 8.37 ±1.88
90 127.60 ± 10.27 66.67 ± 5.86 172.41 ± 13.56 186.04 ± 14.74 28.79 ±3.10 111.48 ± 9.21
10 62.99 ± 5.36 22.62 ± 2.00 78.83 ± 6.67 109.07 ± 9.26 4.89 ± 0.52 33.09 ± 2.88
20 164.07 ± 12.83 34.32 ± 2.93 183.05 ± 14.25 171.50 ± 13.49 7.17 ± 0.89 68.21 ± 5.55
04 4.50 ± 0.87 3.55 ± 0.72 0.30 ± 0.25 4.60 ± 0.90 0.00 ± 0.17 2.57 ± 0.58
14 45.19 ±4.61 19.30 ± 2.08 65.69 ± 6.62 84.08 ± 8.48 4.14 ± 0.60 30.26 ± 3.16
08 13.78 ± 3.16 0.16 ± 0.32 9.31 ± 2.22 13.38 ± 3.09 0.38 ± 0.36 5.07 ±1.34
04 103.40 ± 9.54 31 .89 ± 4.59 106.94 ± 9.76 126.08 ± 1 1 .36 13.72 ± 3.51 56.53 ± 6.38
27 66.37 ± 10.03 18.98 ± 3.24 66.33 ± 10.01 78.56 ± 1 1 .81 2.98 ± 1 .01 25.98 ± 4.27
05 3.56 ± 0.57 2.16 ± 0.38 9.04 ±1.31 3.04 ± 0.50 0.47 ± 0.19 2.49 ± 0.43
14 102.07 ± 8.56 29.30 ± 2.60 71 .05 ± 5.99 97.42 ± 8.22 7.13 ± 0.78 35.47 ± 3.1 1
06 4.85 ± 0.88 1 .80 ± 0.40 2.23 ± 0.47 4.96 ± 0.90 0.34 ± 0.21 2.40 ± 0.49
20 82.46 ± 9.76 13.24 ±4.94 40.81 ± 6.68 59.15 ± 8.25 0.00 ±4.01 18.31 ± 5.48
07 1 .79 ± 0.41 4.51 ± 0.92 4.43 ± 0.90 6.88 ± 1 .38 0.86 ± 0.26 0.86 ± 0.26
29 50.53 ± 4.65 18.64 ± 1 .87 20.1 1 ± 1 .97 38.25 ± 3.59 5.39 ± 0.73 18.42 ± 1 .85
29 19.83 ± 4.63 2.65 ± 1 .09 0.00 ± 0.42 5.12 ± 1 .63 0.00 ± 0.45 0.62 ± 0.74
57 46.27 ± 8.57 10.43 ± 4.98 10.55 ± 5.01 21 .35 ± 6.24 0.00 ± 4.09 21 .42 ± 6.24
11 1 .52 ± 0.36 7.33 ± 1 .58 2.48 ± 0.56 7.57 ± 1 .63 1 .93 ± 0.45 2.80 ± 0.63
64 44.18 ±4.54 13.43 ±1.94 12.37 ±1.84 23.07 ± 2.78 0.00 ± 0.83 16.22 ± 2.22
34 0.00 ± 0.33 0.60 ± 0.47 2.89 ± 0.90 7.89 ± 1 .93 0.30 ± 0.41 0.01 ± 0.39
04 15.58 ± 3.39 3.15 ± 0.73 2.61 ± 0.61 4.30 ± 0.97 1 .43 ± 0.37 1 .81 ± 0.45
38 0.00 ± 3.98 0.00 ± 3.22 0.00 ± 3.26 0.00 ± 3.53 0.00 ± 3.42 0.00 ± 3.83
72 21 .94 ± 4.62 1 .39 ± 1 .92 9.88 ± 2.97 12.35 ± 3.40 0.00 ± 1 .64 5.94 ± 2.56
20 5.05 ± 1 .30 0.19 ± 0.40 0.59 ± 0.46 6.20 ± 1 .55 2.49 ± 0.81 2.72 ± 0.86
39 3.38 ± 1 .58 0.00 ± 1 .04 3.01 ± 1 .55 0.00 ± 1 .07 0.00 ± 1 .35 0.64 ± 1 .48
04 4.15 ± 0.65 6.83 ±1.06 0.85 ± 0.19 7.50 ±1.15 0.04 ± 0.13 0.22 ± 0.14
19 5.70 ± 1 .55 9.72 ± 2.22 8.51 ± 2.02 13.50 ± 2.90 5.75 ± 1 .56 0.39 ± 0.75
04 1.77 ± 0.44 0.53 ± 0.19 0.55 ± 0.19 1.65 ± 0.41 0.02 ± 0.13 0.11 ± 0.15
43 0.00 ±1.13 0.00 ± 1 .25 5.59 ± 2.28 0.00 ± 1 .43 2.07 ± 1 .89 0.18 ± 1 .78
13 6.71 ± 1 .70 0.47 ± 0.63 1 1 .89 ± 2.62 1 1 .86 ± 2.64 3.88 ± 1 .21 3.87 ± 1 .24
33 0.00 ±1.23 1.21 ±1.56 6.31 ±2.39 0.00 ±0.91 0.00 ±1.33 0.12 ±1.48
09 0.00 ± 0.43 0.00 ± 0.32 0.22 ± 0.76 0.00 ± 0.50 0.00 ± 0.56 0.00 ± 0.38
16 0.00 ± 0.51 0.00 ± 0.39 2.91 ± 0.85 0.00 ± 0.39 0.99 ± 0.64 1 .08 ± 0.67
04 0.87 ± 0.52 0.00 ± 0.15 0.00 ± 0.30 0.00 ± 0.15 0.00 ± 0.18 0.00 ± 0.19
14 0.00 ± 0.34 0.00 ± 0.47 1 .79 ± 0.80 0.00 ± 0.36 0.00 ± 0.47 0.00 ± 0.56
05 0.00 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.18 0.11 ± 0.41 0.00 ± 0.15 0.00 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.16
13 0.00 ± 0.35 0.00 ± 0.29 0.00 ± 0.38 0.00 ± 0.30 0.00 ± 0.29 0.00 ± 0.51
04 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.16 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.28
1 1 0.00 ± 0.24 0.00 ± 0.26 0.00 ± 0.26 0.00 ± 0.29 0.00 ± 0.21 0.00 ± 0.33
04 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.14
21 0.00 ± 5.21 0.00 ± 2.24 0.00 ± 1 .84 0.00 ± 1 .95 22.26 ± 9.80 0.00 ± 1 .96
06 0.00 ± 0.21 0.06 ± 0.69 0.05 ± 0.70 7.24 ± 2.10 0.00 ± 0.37 0.00 ± 0.21
.04 -99.00 ± 0.13 -99.00 ± 0.13 -99.00 ± 0.13 -99.00 ± 0.16 -99.00 ± 0.13 -99.00 ± 0.14
65 27.43 ± 8.43 0.00 ± 2.74 0.00 ± 2.92 0.00 ± 3.24 23.68 ± 7.85 0.00 ± 3.08
26 177.79 ± 26.08 34.33 ± 5.82 0.00 ± 0.37 68.67 ± 10.72 27.51 ± 4.87 1 1 .48 ± 2.68
17 0.00 ± 1 .71 0.00 ± 0.40 0.00 ± 0.33 0.00 ± 0.98 0.00 ± 0.86 0.00 ± 0.34
24 0.00 ± 1 .57 0.00 ± 1 .01 0.00 ± 1 .81 0.00 ± 0.51 0.00 ± 2.17 0.00 ± 0.49
B2-3
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
4-me-guaiacol
me-succinic acid (d-c4)
m-toluic
nonanoic acid (c9)
2,6-dimethylbenzoic acid
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid (d-c5)
2-methylglutaric (d-c5)
2,5-dimethylbenzoic acid
3-methylglutaric acid (d-c5)
2,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
2,3- and 3,5- dimethylbenzoic acid
decanoic acid (c10)
4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyl-syringol
3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
hexanedioic (adipic) acid (d-c6)
salcylic acid
trans-2-decenoic acid
cis-pinonic acid
3-methyladipic acid (d-c6)
4-formyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid (c11)
isoeugenol
heptanedioic (pimelic) acid (d-c7)
2,3-dimethoxybenzoic acid
acetovanillone
2,6-dimethoxybenzoicacid
dodecanoic (lauric) acid (c12)
2,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
phthalic acid
suberic acid (d-c8)
levoglucosan
3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
syringaldehyde
3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
tridecanoic acid (c13)
isophthalic acid
vanillic acid
homovanillic acid
azelaic acid (d-c9)
myristoleic acid
myristic acid (c14)
sebacic acid (d-c10)
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid (c15)
undecanedioic acid (c11)
palmitoleic acid
palmitic acid (c16)
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid (d-c12)
traumatic acid
heptadecanoic acid (c17)
1,11-undecanedicarboxylic acid (d-c13)
oleic acid
elaidic acid
stearicacid(c18)
1,12-dodecanedicarboxylic acid (d-c14)
8,15-pimaradien-18-oic acd
pimaric acid
sandaracopimaric acid
nonadecanoic acid (c19)
isopimaric acid
palustric acid
dihydroisopimaric acid
8-abietic acid
dehydroabietic acid
8,14-abietenic acid
abietic acid
eicosanoic acid (c20)
levopimaric acid
heneicosanoic acid (c21)
7-oxodehydroabietic acid
docosanoic acid (c22)
tricosanoic acid (c23)
tetracosanoic acid (c24)
cholesterol
cholestanol
ergosterol
stigmasterol
sitosterol
WO-1
-99.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.04
0.88 ±0.45
0.00 ±1.73
0.00 ±0.10
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.14
0.01 ±0.17
0.00 ±39.58
0.00 ±0.13
0.35 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.56 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.04
0.25 ±0.51
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.02 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.14 ±0.21
0.72 ±0.46
0.01 ±0.03
0.27 ±0.78
0.00 ±0.03
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.03
0.32 ±0.07
0.04 ±0.09
0.00 ±1.62
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.04
0.77 ±0.20
0.22 ±0.14
#N/A
0.04 ±0.08
1.27 ±0.57
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.10±0.10
0.01 ±0.04
0.27 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±2.53
0.04 ± 0.04
0.00 ±0.04
1.37 ±0.33
0.18 ±0.24
0.40 ±0.19
0.04 ± 0.04
0.03 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.09
0.07 ±0.07
0.06 ±0.03
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.05
0.08 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
WO-2
-99.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.10 ±0.80
0.00 ±2.07
0.00 ±0.27
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.04 ±0.08
0.67 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.13
0.56 ±67.61
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.37
0.09 ±0.10
0.32 ±0.79
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.08
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ± 0.44
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±1.41
0.00 ±0.07
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.25 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±2. 15
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.08
0.04 ± 0.40
0.00 ±0.10
12.03 ±1.98
0.05 ±0.19
#N/A
0.03 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.93
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.07
3.38 ±1.27
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±2.97
0.00 ±0.09
0.38 ±0.17
0.52 ±0.21
0.21 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.12
0.26 ±0.11
0.03 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.09
1.42 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.17
0.38 ±0.17
0.14±0.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
WO-3
-99.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.04 ± 0.43
0.00 ±1.84
0.00 ±0.07
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±25.82
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.30 ±0.28
0.17 ±0.07
0.47 ± 0.45
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.05
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.29
0.00 ±0.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.10 ±0.07
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.05
0.23 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±1.27
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.05 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.05
0.48 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.13
#N/A
0.02 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.52
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±1.96
0.03 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.10
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
WO-4
-99.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.96 ±0.56
0.00 ±2.02
0.00 ±0.10
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±26.33
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.87 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.10
0.36 ±0.80
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.15 ±0.40
1.78 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.04
0.00±1.15
0.00 ±0.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.07 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.05
0.41 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±1.42
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.05
6.16±1.03
0.12±0.16
#N/A
0.01 ±0.17
0.30 ±0.71
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.04
0.30 ±0.63
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±2.21
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.11
0.33 ±0.31
2.72 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.47 ±0.13
2.43 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.10
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
wo-s
-99.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
2.57 ±0.73
0.00 ±2.02
0.00 ±0.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.03 ±0.05
0.54 ± 0.43
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±36.71
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.06
1.37 ±1.09
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.05
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.45
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.14
0.00 ±0.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.41 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.10
0.00±1.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.04
4.62 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.13
#N/A
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.60
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±2.07
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.09
2.51 ±1.23
0.91 ±0.28
0.20 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
4.40 ±1.23
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
WO-6
-99.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.09 ±0.39
0.00 ±2.08
0.00 ±0.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.15 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±24.98
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.19
0.04 ±0.05
0.07 ±0.30
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.05
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±1.24
0.00 ±0.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.49 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.05
1.23 ±0.23
0.09 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.92
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.38 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.04
1.53 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.09
1.64 ±0.31
#N/A
0.05 ±0.10
13.23±1.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.04
1.04 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.04
6. 54 ±1.43
0.00 ±0.14
6.07 ±2.88
0.00 ±0.05
0.03 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.07
0.02 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.01 ±0.05
0.48 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.12
0.04 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.10
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W1-1
-99.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.15
444.71 ±53.01
0.00 ±5.66
24.85 ±5.71
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.46
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±62.82
50.91 ±9.81
0.00 ±0.41
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
78.26 ±14.43
0.00 ±0.15
122.36±21.72
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.31
1.84 ±0.75
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.26
0.00±11.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
6.46 ±1.71
0.00 ±0.90
2.41 ±0.39
18.48 ±32.57
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
14.70 ±3.34
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
36.09 ±6.28
1.59 ±0.67
0.00 6.84
-99.00 -99.00
-99.00 -99.00
0.00 0.30
0.00 0.32
26.68 2.56
0.00 0.23
1.50 0.59
10.58 2.17
#N/A
1.99 ±1.76
258.42 ±20.92
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
29.67 ±6.94
0.00 ±0.14
133.09 ±24.58
126.63 ±30.07
352.50 ±77.39
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.20
1.36 ±0.47
0.77 ±0.71
1.36 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.15
0.97 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.51
1.48 ±0.45
0.20 ±0.16
0.83 ±0.61
0.86 ±0.30
1.69 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.82
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.49
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W1-2
-99.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
53.60 ±8.06
0.00 ±3.71
0.00 ±0.64
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
6.62 ±1.93
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±72.72
0.00 ±1.62
0.00 ±0.30
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
9.74 ±2.99
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±4. 44
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.30
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±7.03
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
5.89 ±1.45
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.66 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±6.57
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.63
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.59
#N/A
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±1.57
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.14
3. 15 ±2.79
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±6.48
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±0.30
0.06 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.32
0.71 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.39
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W1-3
-99.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.15
229.09 ±28. 15
0.00 ±3.32
14.28 ±3.57
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
30. 16 ±5.75
0.00 ±0.19
0.00±51.18
34.50 ±7.29
0.00 ±0.33
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
56.84 ±10.84
0.00 ±0.15
14.33 ±6.53
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.34
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.88
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±13.41
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
26.63 ±4.66
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±5.76
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.68
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.48
#N/A
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±1.72
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±1.60
0.00 ±0.79
11. 53 ±9.61
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.30
2.02 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.40
0.27 ±0.91
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.53
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W2-1
-99.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.67
108.58 ±14.45
0.00 ±4.95
7.43 ±2.22
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.31
1.47 ±1.22
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±150.54
1.64 ±2.52
0.00 ±0.38
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
17.28 ±4.33
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±4.80
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.18
0.82 ±0.52
0.00 ±0.41
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±20.57
-99.00 ±-99.00
4.72 ±1.45
10.33 ±1.72
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±12. 19
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
24.69 ± 5.49
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
35.81 ±6.24
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±12.22
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.14
3. 10 ±0.84
0.00 ±0.41
#N/A
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±1.45
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±1.38
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±6.72
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.17
0.03 ±0.30
11.37±5.16
0.00 ±0.27
0.04 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.33
0.27 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.21
0.37 ±0.21
0.10 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.36
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W2-2
-99.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.78
61. 77 ±9.01
16.67 ±7.52
25. 12 ±5.78
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.42
13.29 ±3.02
0.00 ±0.43
0.00±191.81
7.64 ±3.26
0.00 ±0.51
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
15.83 ±4.02
0.00 ±0.28
26.11 ±8.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.22
1.85 ±0.75
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.20
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.43
7.09 ±1.46
0.56 ±0.21
72.00±43.10
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.83 ±0.39
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.15
1.15±0.61
0.00 ±7.69
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.24
3.33 ±1.04
0.00 ±0.14
2.00 ±0.66
1.28 ±0.88
#N/A
0.00 ±0.43
8.29 ±2.21
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.17
2.08 ±2.65
0.00 ±0.47
4.03 ±8.41
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.06 ±0.28
0.16 ±0.49
0.94 ± 0.42
0.00 ±0.15
0.03 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.20
0.08 ±0.16
0.21 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.45
0.00 ±0.17
4.95 ±1.60
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W2-3
-99.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.15
14.49 ±3.81
0.00 ±4. 14
0.53 ±0.85
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
2.26 ±1.32
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±53.36
0.00 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.33
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±1.37
0.00 ±0.16
0.00±1.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.29
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.78
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±3.04
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±2.56
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.65
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.61
#N/A
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±1.57
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±1.62
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±6. 6
0.00 ±0. 7
0.00 ±0. 6
0.00 ±0. 2
0.00 ±0. 2
0.00 ±0. 5
0.00 ±0. 5
0.00 ±0. 4
0.00 ±0. 4
0.00 ±0. 4
0.00 ±0. 3
0.00 ±0. 2
0.00 ±0. 4
0.00 ±0. 1
0.00 ±0. 5
0.00 ±0. 1
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ± 0.44
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ± 0.44
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
B2-4
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description WO-1 WO -2 WO -3 WO -4 WO-S WO -6 W1 -1 W1 -2 W1 -3 W2-1 W2-2 W2-3
Carbonvls (ma/mile)
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acetone
* acrolein <
propionaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
Methacrolein
* n-butyraldehyde
benzaldehyde
glyoxal
valeraldehyde
tolualdehyde
hexanal
* acrolein converts to an unknown rearrang
1,3 butadiene (estimated)
C2 compounds
propene
propane
isoButane
IButene-HButylene
n-Butane
t-2-Butene
c-2-Butene
3-Me-1-Butene
isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Me-1-Butene
n-Pentane
t-2-Pentene
c-2-Pentene
2-Me-2-Butene
CycloPentene
CycloPentane
23DiMeButane
MTBE
2-MePentane
3-MePentane
2-Me-1-Pentene
1-Hexene
n-Hexane
t-2-Hexene
c-3-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Hexene
c-2-Hexene
t-3-Me-2-Pentene
MeCyPentane
2,4-DiMePentane
Benzene
CycloHexane
4MeHexene
2MeHexane
3MeHexane
Cyclohexene
SEtPentane
224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
2MeHeptane
3MeHeptane
Hexanal
225TMHexane
Octene-1
11DMeCyHexane
n-Octane
24DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
33DiMeHeptane
EtBenzene
m/p-xylene
.32 ± 0.60 2.04 ± 98 292.42 ± 16.34 6.00 ±1.10
02 ± 0.46 0.00 ± 71 266.47 ± 25.51 2.07 ± 1 .90
.01 ±1.13 27.14± .31 88.47 ±7.28 0.00 ±3.65
42 ± O.007 <0.0 0 4.57 ± 1 .14 <0.065 ± <0.043
00 ± 0.15 0.00 ± 00 27.73 ± 3.28 0.00 ± 1 .01
00 ± 0.22 0.00 ±44 15.15 ± 2.18 0.00 ±1.44
72 ± 0.32 0.00 ±80 1 1 .47 ± 2.98 0.00 ± 1 .81
00 ± 0.22 0.00 ± 44 28.74 ± 3.58 0.00 ± 1 .44
04±-0.01 <0.0 0 0.00±0.00 -0.07±-0.03
28 ± 0.37 0.00 ± 91 158.01 ± 16.09 0.62 ±1.92
00 ± 0.1 1 0.00 ± 71 0.57 ± 0.71 0.00 ± 0.71
00 ± 0.25 0.00 ± 66 9.41 ± 2.05 0.00 ± 1 .67
26 ± 0.38 0.00 ± 06 72.42 ± 1 1 .81 0.00 ± 2.07
00 ± 0.28 0.00 ± 84 5.98 ± 2.05 0.00 ± 1 .85
ent product that co-elutes with butyr aldehyde. Where indicated, the sum of acrolein and butyraldehyde is given as an estimate of the upper limit of the true value for either compound.
21 ± 0.100 16.987 ± 9.388 2.069 ±1.143
73 ± 0.123 583.030 ± 82.328 53.674 ± 7.579
29 ± 0.026 5.191 ± 0.260 1 .348 ± 0.067
34 ± 0.022 1 1 .388 ± 0.569 10.534 ± 0.527
97 ± 0.007 51 .360 ± 3.482 7.972 ± 0.540
97 ± 0.070 141 .736 ± 7.087 67.430 ± 3.371
39 ± 0.002 12.866 ± 0.709 2.426 ± 0.134
36 ± 0.003 9.830 ± 0.909 1 .420 ± 0.131
09 ± 0.001 3.180 ± 0.159 0.711 ± 0.036
55 ± 0.062 166.535 ± 10.872 43.804 ± 2.860
17 ± 0.001 6.471 ± 0.388 0.672 ± 0.040
31 ±0.002 10.382±0.760 1.321 ±0.097
99 ± 0.018 37.995 ± 2.265 14.51 1 ± 0.865
31 ± 0.002 12.742 ± 0.637 1.176 ± 0.059
18 ± 0.002 6.767 ± 0.588 0.615 ± 0.053
50 ± 0.029 12.314 ± 0.660 1 .371 ± 0.073
08 ± 0.001 3.488 ± 0.214 0.854 ± 0.052
37 ± 0.002 5.382 ± 0.269 1 .279 ± 0.064
48 ± 0.003 18.455 ± 1 .095 4.857 ± 0.288
41 ± 0.002 1.419 ± 0.086 0.107 ± 0.006
39 ± 0.008 63.020 ± 3.605 12.314 ± 0.704
18 ± 0.006 41.405 ± 2.070 8.381 ± 0.419
67 ± 0.018 41.519 ± 2.079 6.244 ± 0.313
58 ± 0.003 5.030 ± 0.252 0.462 ± 0.023
05 ± 0.001 2.132 ± 0.107 0.176 ± 0.009
03 ± 0.001 0.617 ± 0.031 0.056 ± 0.003
04 ± 0.001 2.669 ± 0.133 0.212 ± 0.011
14 ± 0.001 3.943 ± 0.197 0.368 ± 0.018
90 ± 0.005 32.376 ± 1 .865 4.240 ± 0.244
58 ± 0.003 28.249 ± 1 .412 4.031 ± 0.202
91 ± 0.012 160.599 ± 9.929 8.903 ± 0.550
30 ± 0.002 17.403 ± 1 .005 1 .298 ± 0.075
03 ± 0.001 0.922 ± 0.085 0.150 ± 0.014
51 ± 0.003 35.993 ± 1 .800 3.597 ± 0.180
63 ± 0.003 40.649 ± 2.032 4.260 ± 0.213
06 ± 0.001 0.181 ± 0.038 0.015 ± 0.003
20 ± 0.001 1 1 .583 ± 0.741 1 .133 ± 0.072
02 ± 0.014 109.638 ± 7.820 10.272 ± 0.733
04 ± 0.001 2.150 ± 0.108 0.114 ± 0.006
60 ± 0.003 32.692 ±1.635 3.182 ± 0.159
05 ± 0.001 0.616 ± 0.032 0.039 ± 0.002
46 ± 0.002 14.754 ± 0.738 1 .588 ± 0.079
26 ± 0.002 1 1 .913 ± 0.812 1 .161 ± 0.079
41 ± 0.002 22.907 ± 1 .145 1 .966 ± 0.098
71 ± 0.004 33.279 ± 1 .664 2.543 ± 0.127
73 ± 0.054 282.351 ± 14.118 18.258 ± 0.913
34 ± 0.002 12.972 ± 0.698 1.219 ± 0.066
37 ± 0.002 21 .231 ± 1 .062 1 .491 ± 0.075
36 ± 0.002 23.037 ± 1 .152 1 .460 ± 0.073
00 ± 0.279 5.980 ± 2.046 0.000 ± 1 .854
14 ± 0.001 4.950 ± 0.248 0.450 ± 0.022
30 ± 0.001 8.278 ± 0.414 1 .490 ± 0.075
03 ± 0.001 1 .076 ± 0.054 0.103 ± 0.005
44 ± 0.002 20.698 ± 1 .035 1 .385 ± 0.069
29±0.001 2.121 ±0.106 0.318±0.016
20 ± 0.001 8.939 ± 0.447 0.550 ± 0.027
02 ± 0.001 0.301 ± 0.015 0.021 ± 0.001
93 ± 0.015 67.992 ± 3.400 3.167 ± 0.158
87 ± 0.044 193.225 ± 9.661 1 1 .796 ± 0.590
B2-5
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
2MeOctane
3MeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
iPropBenzene
IPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
nPropBenzene
mEt Toluene
pEtToluene
135TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
Octanal
beta-pinene
124TriMeBenzene
n-Decane
iButBenzene
sButBenzene
Limonene
Indan
13diethylbenzene
14diethylbenzene
1 2diethylbenzene
2-propylToluene
3-ipropyltoluene
4-ipropyltoluene
2-ipropyltoluene
n-Undecane
1 245tetraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1234tetraMeBenzene
n-Dodecane
WO-1 WO-2 WO-3 WO-4 WO-S WO -6 W1-1
.023 ±0.001
.032 ±0.002
.134 ±0.007
.378 ±0.019
.016 ±0.001
.044 ± 0.002
.005 ±0.001
.035 ±0.002
.028 ±0.005
.139 ±0.007
.576 ±0.029
.261 ±0.013
.313 ±0.016
.224 ±0.011
.033 ±0.009
.006 ±0.001
.074 ± 0.054
.089 ±0.005
.036 ±0.002
.023 ±0.001
.293 ±0.015
.076 ±0.008
.164 ±0.016
.465 ± 0.026
.044 ± 0.002
.134 ±0.007
.037 ±0.002
.038 ±0.002
.028 ±0.005
.079 ±0.016
.161 ±0.026
.228 ±0.011
.098 ±0.005
.092 ±0.005
W1-2 W1-3 W2-1
6.570 ±0.329
13.391 ±0.824
4.536 ±0.227
70.561 ±3.528
3.885 ±0.194
6.662 ±0.333
1.297 ±0.086
4.280 ±0.269
0.567 ±0.104
15.555 ±0.778
53. 167 ±2.658
20.666 ±1.033
25.833 ±1.292
16.783 ±0.839
1.375 ±0.393
0.563 ±0.028
64.800 ± 3.240
5.982 ±0.334
1.812±0.091
1.392 ±0.070
12.781 ±0.639
8.506 ±0.913
3.873 ±0.388
11. 343 ±0.630
1.720 ±0.086
2.349±0.117
1.871 ±0.094
0.082 ±0.005
0.416 ±0.076
1.487 ±0.297
1.778 ±0.286
2.036 ±0.102
0.480 ± 0.024
0.193 ±0.010
W2-2 W2-3
.000 ±0.001
.600 ±0.037
.224 ±0.011
.824 ±0.191
.200 ±0.010
.302 ±0.015
.076 ±0.005
.296 ±0.019
.043 ± 0.008
.614 ±0.031
.711 ±0.136
.088 ± 0.054
.396 ±0.070
.884 ± 0.044
.110±0.031
.039 ±0.002
.721 ±0.186
.576 ±0.032
.111 ±0.006
.069 ±0.003
.897 ± 0.045
.425 ± 0.046
.294 ± 0.029
.653 ±0.036
.118 ±0.006
.274 ±0.014
.099 ±0.005
.021 ±0.001
.048 ± 0.009
.108 ±0.022
.203 ±0.033
.263 ±0.013
.089 ± 0.004
.048 ± 0.002
B2-6
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description W3-1
Gravimetric mass (mg/mi) 29.38 ± 1 .49
Carbon fractions by TOR (mg/mi)
Organic Carbon Fraction 1 4.040 ± 0.488
Organic Carbon Fraction 2 2.800 ± 0.406
Organic Carbon Fraction 4 1 .935 ± 0.539
Pyrolyzed Organic Carbon 0.083 ± 0.039
Elemental Carbon Fraction 1 6.625 ± 1 .529
Elemental Carbon Fraction 3 0.1 18 ± 0.098
Total Elemental Carbon 16.248 ± 2.884
TotalCarbon 26.457±1.812
Elements bvXRF (ma/mi)
Sodium (qualitative only) 0.0998 ± 0.0352
Magnesium (qualitative only) 0.0073 ± 0.0331
Aluminum 0.0222 ±0.0224
Phosphorous 0.0950 ± 0.0053
Sulfur 0.2153±0.0115
Chlorine 0.0187 ±0.0021
Potassium 0.0022 ±0.0031
Calcium 0.2356 ±0.0120
Titanium 0.0013±0.0011
Vanadium 0.0003 ± 0.0004
Chromium 0.0115±0.0018
Manganese 0.0022 ± 0.0047
Iron 0.3880 ±0.0209
Cobalt 0.0001 ±0.0008
Nickel 0.0032 ±0.0013
Copper 0.0085 ±0.0012
Zinc 0.1143±0.0066
Gallium 0.0000 ±0.0041
Arsenic 0.0000±0.0011
Selenium 0.0000 ±0.0009
Bromine 0.0023 ±0.0012
Rubidium 0.0004 ±0.0011
Strontium 0.0016 ±0.0024
Yttrium 0.0000 ±0.0015
Zirconium 0.0009 ±0.0032
Molybdenum 0.0022 ± 0.0037
Palladium 0.0039 ±0.0046
Silver 0.0000 ±0.0035
Cadmium 0.0000 ±0.0048
Indium 0.0014 ±0.0038
Tin 0.0009 ±0.0046
Antimony 0.0003 ±0.0047
Barium 0.0071 ±0.0109
Lanthanum 0.0000 ±0.0260
Gold 0.0000 ±0.0050
Mercury 0.0017 ±0.0019
Thallium 0.0000 ±0.0035
Lead 0.0358 ±0.0039
Uranium 0.0000 ±0.0047
Anions bvIC (mq/mi)
Nitrate Ion 0.02 ±0.01
Sulfatelon 0.24 ±0.02
Polvcvclic aromatic hydrocarbons (ua/mile)
Naphthalene 1924.91 ±296.78
Biphenyl 241. 78 ±31. 01
1+2ethylnaphthalene 499.03 ± 68.21
1 ,3+1 ,6+1 Jdimethylnaphth 715.20 ± 86.42
1 ,4+1 ,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth 57.40 ± 6.75
1 ,2-dimethylnaphthalene 280.72 ± 37.50
2-Methylbiphenyl 0.00 ± 13.84
3-Methylbiphenyl 65.93 ± 1 1 .97
4-Methylbiphenyl 29.78 ± 4.67
Dibenzofuran 24.91 ±2.75
1-ethyl- 2-methylnaphthalene 14.38 ± 1.10
B-trimethylnaphthalene 92.54 ± 13.38
2-ethyl-1-methylnaphthalene 1 .53 ± 0.21
E-trimethylnaphthalene 30.97 ± 2.78
F-trimethylnaphthalene 29.38 ± 3.22
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene 5.60 ± 0.84
J-trimethylnaphthalene 17.27± 1.99
1 ,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene 5.76 ± 0.95
Acenaphthene 88.89 ±7.79
Fluorene 112.50±11.51
W3-2
23.57 ±1.19
2.341 ±0.210
2.387 ±0.253
1.376 ±0.250
0.200 ±0.070
2.653 ±0.393
0.062 ±0.030
9.001 ±1.220
16.938 ±0.999
0.0459 ±0.0195
0.0030 ±0.0189
0.0837 ±0.0136
0.0780 ±0.0041
1.0009 ±0.0504
0.0305 ±0.0019
0.0033 ±0.0018
0.0975 ±0.0050
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0094 ±0.0011
0.0015 ±0.0027
0.1566 ±0.0089
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0031 ±0.0007
0.0047 ±0.0007
0.0405 ±0.0027
0.0025 ±0.0023
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0036 ±0.0007
0.0001 ±0.0007
0.0012 ±0.0013
0.0002 ±0.0009
0.0004 ±0.0018
0.0014 ±0.0021
0.0008 ±0.0026
0.0006 ±0.0020
0.0003 ±0.0028
0.0004 ±0.0022
0.0002 ±0.0026
0.0018 ±0.0027
0.0030 ±0.0062
0.0058 ±0.0149
0.0017 ±0.0029
0.0009 ±0.0011
0.0006 ±0.0020
0.0035 ±0.0019
0.0015 ±0.0027
0.03 ±0.01
1.99 ±0.11
835.97 ±130.70
65.07 ±8.39
169.62 ±23.37
256.39 ±31. 11
32.08 ±3.83
62.71 ±8.40
0.00 ±12.67
0.00 ± 5.44
0.00 ±1.99
12.09 ±1.34
5.52 ±0.43
32.06 ±4.66
0.47 ±0.09
12.15±1.10
12.33 ±1.36
4.56 ±0.68
2.40 ±0.29
2.34 ± 0.40
58.79 ±5.33
62.64 ± 6.43
W3-3
15.21 ±0.77
1.499±0.140
1.558±0.159
1.194±0.247
0.030 ±0.018
2.479 ± 0.448
0.057 ±0.028
4.232 ±0.564
9.341 ±0.577
0.0433 ±0.0195
0.0016 ±0.0189
0.0598 ±0.0133
0.1059 ±0.0055
0.6767 ±0.0341
0.8524 ± 0.0428
0.0036 ±0.0018
0.1874 ±0.0095
0.0013 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0095 ±0.0011
0.0011 ±0.0027
0.1676 ±0.0094
0.0003 ±0.0005
0.0022 ±0.0007
0.0073 ±0.0007
0.0957 ±0.0051
0.0001 ±0.0023
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0084 ±0.0008
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.0011 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0040 ±0.0018
0.0051 ±0.0021
0.0020 ±0.0026
0.0014 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0028
0.0008 ±0.0022
0.0020 ±0.0026
0.0023 ±0.0027
0.0042 ±0.0063
0.0094 ±0.0149
0.0025 ±0.0029
0.0006 ±0.0011
0.0003 ±0.0020
0.0047 ±0.0020
0.0012 ±0.0027
0.04 ±0.01
1.65 ±0.09
1862.48 ±287.77
99.64 ±12.81
357.48 48.92
384.67 46.53
13.64 2.36
45.67 6.19
108.74 39.81
105.06 16.59
40.36 5.91
26.29 2.91
44 0.52
.49 5.73
60 0.18
.29 ±1.21
.88 ±1.75
82 ± 0.45
04 ±0.61
83 ±0.23
.86 ±1.94
W4-1
6.89 ±0.42
0.831 ±0.151
0.552 ±0.097
0.289 ±0.168
0.036 ±0.030
1.848±0.513
0.000 ±0.009
0.0398 ±0.0331
0.0150 ±0.0322
0.0234 ±0.0218
0.0480 ±0.0032
0.0952 ±0.0061
0.0080 ±0.0018
0.0060 ±0.0030
0.1038 ±0.0056
0.0010 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0042 ±0.0016
0.0001 ±0.0046
0.1286 ±0.0096
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0012 ±0.0012
0.0149 ±0.0013
0.0806 ±0.0051
0.0017 ±0.0040
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0002 ±0.0012
0.0001 ±0.0011
0.0007 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0015
0.0019 ±0.0031
0.0007 ±0.0036
0.0004 ± 0.0044
0.0002 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0047
0.0000 ±0.0037
0.0009 ±0.0045
0.0000 ±0.0045
0.0028 ±0.0106
0.0000 ±0.0252
0.0000 ±0.0049
0.0000 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0034
0.0043 ±0.0033
0.0002 ±0.0046
0.01 ±0.01
0.17 ±0.01
479.49 ±76.38
46.09 ±5.97
176.39 ±24.34
190.42 ±23. 17
13.42 ±1.65
51.12±6.86
0.00 ±11. 3
0.00 ±5.1
0.00 ±1.7
8.29 ±0.9
4.00 ±0.3
25.74 ±3.7
0.46 ±0.0
8.60 ±0.7
9.27 ±1.0
2.44 ± 0.3
4.31 ±0.5
0.80 ±0.1
8.34 ±1.23
W4-2
6.02 ±0.33
0.935 ±0.106
0.564 ±0.063
0.370 ±0.108
0.002 ±0.016
1.101 ±0.189
0.014 ±0.009
0.0037 ±0.0191
0.0000 ±0.0189
0.0051 ±0.0128
0.0159 ±0.0014
0.1660 ±0.0086
0.0030 ±0.0011
0.0012 ±0.0018
0.0401 ±0.0023
0.0005 ±0.0006
0.0002 ±0.0002
0.0028 ±0.0010
0.0005 ±0.0027
0.0452 ± 0.0047
0.0001 ±0.0005
0.0013 ±0.0007
0.0097 ±0.0008
0.0177 ±0.0020
0.0017 ±0.0023
0.0005 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0010 ±0.0007
0.0005 ±0.0007
0.0006 ±0.0013
0.0002 ±0.0009
0.0009 ±0.0018
0.0003 ±0.0021
0.0018 ±0.0026
0.0007 ±0.0020
0.0004 ±0.0028
0.0005 ±0.0022
0.0030 ±0.0026
0.0020 ±0.0027
0.0052 ±0.0062
0.0008 ±0.0149
0.0019 ±0.0029
0.0007 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0015 ±0.0019
0.0011 ±0.0027
0.03 ±0.01
0.40 ±0.02
523.21 ±83.25
37.00 ±4.81
115.33±16.03
105.88 ±12.97
3.71 ±0.78
17.20 ±2.35
0.00 ±13.54
0.00 ±4.36
0.00 ±1.62
6.95 ±0.78
2.16±0.18
10.31 ±1.52
0.19 ±0.07
3.72 ±0.35
4.02 ±0.46
0.63 ±0.12
1.26±0.16
0.55 ±0.12
24.35 ± 2.54
18.64 ±1.94
W4-3
11. 65 ±0.60
1.418±0.188
0.042 ±0.020
5.301 ±0.376
2.445 ±0.418
0.045 ±0.025
0.0182 ±0.0187
0.0125 ±0.0185
0.0256 ±0.0126
0.0286 ±0.0019
0.1344 ±0.0071
0.0035 ±0.0010
0.0048 ±0.0017
0.0885 ±0.0046
0.0019 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0088 ±0.0010
0.0007 ±0.0026
0.1343 ±0.0079
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0015 ±0.0007
0.0054 ±0.0007
0.0271 ±0.0022
0.0036 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0013 ±0.0007
0.0003 ±0.0006
0.0005 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0034 ±0.0018
0.0002 ±0.0021
0.0043 ±0.0026
0.0022 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0027
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0017 ±0.0026
0.0005 ±0.0026
0.0091 ±0.0061
0.0031 ±0.0145
0.0002 ±0.0028
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0030 ±0.0019
0.0002 ±0.0026
0.02 ±0.01
0.24 ±0.01
1111.88±173.51
2508.56 ±257.39
115.90±14.99
377.59 ±51. 98
636.87 ±77.54
58.44 ± 6.93
295.20 ±39.67
0.00 ±13.83
42.48 ±9.95
.51 ±3.87
60 ±1.08
.41 ±0.97
33 ±11. 53
29 ±0.18
.18 ±2.84
.67 ±3.50
58 ± 0.84
.81 ±1.84
83 ±0.96
.59 ±1.51
.15 ±7.67
W5-1
16.82 ±0.86
0.010 ±0.020
8.544 ± 0.582
2.623 ±0.476
0.031 ±0.017
7.389 ±1.099
0.0052 ±0.0232
0.0009 ±0.0229
0.0109 ±0.0155
0.0353 ±0.0023
0.1312 ±0.0071
0.0109 ±0.0014
0.0018 ±0.0021
0.0898 ±0.0047
0.0009 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0061 ±0.0012
0.0016 ±0.0033
0.0878 ±0.0066
0.0004 ±0.0006
0.0026 ±0.0009
0.0036 ±0.0008
0.0461 ±0.0032
0.0018 ±0.0028
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0016
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0012 ±0.0022
0.0021 ±0.0025
0.0004 ±0.0032
0.0006 ±0.0024
0.0001 ±0.0033
0.0003 ±0.0026
0.0012 ±0.0032
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.0035 ±0.0075
0.0028 ±0.0180
0.0003 ±0.0035
0.0004 ±0.0013
0.0004 ± 0.0024
0.0030 ±0.0023
0.0013 ±0.0033
0.03 ±0.01
0.23 ±0.02
2213.96 ±342.90
5147.60 ±528. 11
176. 17 ±22.78
602.90 ±82.88
758.63 ±92.38
62.75 ±7.46
332.10±44.63
0.00 ±17.54
66.44 ±12.42
28.08 ±4.68
18.99 ±2. 13
12.84 ±1.00
80.06 ±11. 65
1.48 ±0.21
29.78 ±2.72
29.26 ±3.24
5.48 ±0.82
14.65 ±1.70
4.88 ±0.82
62.87 ±5.75
123.29 ±12.76
W5-2
0.009 ±0.027
16.452±1.260
10.626 ±2.388
0.042 ±0.032
0.0787 ±0.0371
0.0000 ±0.0354
0.0362 ±0.0242
0.2070 ±0.0107
0.4076 ±0.0211
0.0328 ±0.0026
0.0223 ±0.0035
0.3298 ±0.0167
0.0005 ±0.0011
0.0005 ±0.0005
0.0134 ±0.0019
0.0032 ±0.0051
0.2512 ±0.0150
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0046 ±0.0014
0.0122 ±0.0013
0.2213±0.0116
0.0002 ± 0.0044
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0021 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0002 ±0.0025
0.0002 ±0.0016
0.0034 ± 0.0034
0.0141 ±0.0040
0.0001 ±0.0049
0.0011 ±0.0038
0.0000 ±0.0052
0.0021 ±0.0041
0.0000 ±0.0049
0.0027 ±0.0050
0.0077±0.0117
0.0012 ±0.0280
0.0000 ±0.0054
0.0000 ±0.0021
0.0020 ±0.0038
0.0142 ±0.0037
0.0000 ±0.0051
0.02 ±0.01
0.59 ±0.03
1511.38±235.25
13825.62 ±1409.79
640.29 ± 82.34
1536.80 ±210.22
2721. 45 ±329.72
654.49 ± 76.65
1886.01 ±252.52
0.00 ±23.43
197.57 ±25.88
97.91 ±11.10
68.79 ±7.64
49.79 ±3.83
184.73 ±26.75
6.83 ±0.89
128.77±11.62
116.22±12.77
24.40 ± 3.62
60.36 ±6.97
22.39 ±3.66
60. 15 ±5.54
300.25 ±30.87
WS-3
45.26 ±2.28
0.004 ±0.028
15.572±1.241
0.177 ±0.123
31.238±2.129
0.1537 ±0.0406
0.0550 ±0.0377
0.3248 ±0.0310
0.0902 ±0.0052
1.8294 ±0.0931
0.0398 ±0.0029
0.0000 ±0.0035
0.0681 ±0.0041
0.0005 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0047 ±0.0019
0.0018 ±0.0053
0.0542 ±0.0085
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0005 ±0.0014
0.0017 ±0.0013
0.0234 ±0.0037
0.0000 ±0.0046
0.0000 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0199 ±0.0017
0.0004 ±0.0013
0.0002 ±0.0026
0.0000 ±0.0017
0.0019 ±0.0036
0.0039 ±0.0042
0.0038 ±0.0052
0.0024 ± 0.0040
0.0000 ±0.0054
0.0000 ±0.0043
0.0000 ±0.0052
0.0008 ±0.0053
0.0000 ±0.0122
0.0106 ±0.0293
0.0002 ±0.0057
0.0000 ±0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0040
0.0020 ±0.0038
0.0000 ±0.0053
0.06 ±0.01
4. 19 ±0.22
7313.75±1120.23
18124.51 ±1838.57
648.08 ±83.07
1993.46±271.81
1919.17±231.73
325.24 ±37.99
722.21 ±96.43
117.60±41.36
259.64 ±31. 72
91.97±10.47
48.01 ±5.31
99.83 ±14.44
2. 16 ±0.31
38.82 ±3.49
35.91 ±3.95
6.52 ±0.98
14.64 ±1.69
5.70 ±0.96
139.78±12.01
311.17±31.83
W6-1
56.31 ±2.83
19.798 ±2.738
2.636 ±0.678
2. 170 ±0.617
0.075 ±0.037
32. 125 ±2.732
0.063 ±0.053
52.513 ±3.899
0.0664 ±0.0353
0.0081 ±0.0341
0.0032 ±0.0231
0.1367 ±0.0072
0.2325 ±0.0124
0.0481 ±0.0031
0.0025 ±0.0032
0.3576 ±0.0181
0.0007 ±0.0011
0.0004 ± 0.0004
0.0089 ±0.0018
0.0017 ±0.0049
0.1646±0.0112
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0022 ±0.0013
0.0040 ±0.0012
0.1834 ±0.0098
0.0000 ±0.0042
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0004 ±0.0012
0.0005 ±0.0012
0.0009 ±0.0024
0.0004 ±0.0016
0.0019 ±0.0033
0.0017 ±0.0038
0.0049 ± 0.0047
0.0048 ±0.0036
0.0000 ±0.0050
0.0006 ±0.0039
0.0004 ± 0.0047
0.0000 ±0.0048
0.0051 ±0.0113
0.0082 ±0.0268
0.0004 ±0.0052
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0036
0.0018 ±0.0035
0.0009 ±0.0048
0.01 ±0.01
0.20 ±0.02
4786.73 ±738.00
5840.62 ±599.28
461. 93 ±63.59
832.91 ±101.45
208.06 ±24.55
440.76 ±59.23
0.00 ±22.88
59.05 ±12.57
23.29 ±4.58
52.11 ±5.82
100.80 ±14.66
3.05 ±0.42
45.88 ±4. 18
43.25 ±4.79
11. 63 ±1.74
16.76 ±1.95
8.19±1.36
15.41 ±1.95
157.06 ±16.27
W6-2
17. 14 ±0.90
3. 142 ±0.379
1.157±0.281
0.505 ±0.201
0.003 ±0.028
7.333 ±0.590
0.000 ±0.009
16.921 ±1.175
0.0000 ±0.0343
0.0000 ±0.0341
0.0079 ±0.0232
0.0558 ±0.0036
0.0934 ±0.0062
0.0074 ±0.0019
0.0000 ±0.0032
0.1648 ±0.0085
0.0008 ±0.0011
0.0003 ±0.0004
0.0032 ±0.0017
0.0000 ±0.0049
0.0705 ±0.0082
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0007 ±0.0013
0.0060 ±0.0012
0.0583 ± 0.0044
0.0048 ± 0.0043
0.0006 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0000 ±0.0012
0.0007 ±0.0024
0.0004 ±0.0016
0.0012 ±0.0033
0.0096 ±0.0039
0.0004 ± 0.0047
0.0000 ±0.0036
0.0000 ±0.0050
0.0016 ±0.0039
0.0020 ±0.0048
0.0016 ±0.0048
0.0004±0.0113
0.0146 ±0.0269
0.0037 ±0.0052
0.0007 ±0.0020
0.0000 ±0.0036
0.0067 ±0.0035
0.0007 ±0.0049
0.01 ±0.01
0.11 ±0.01
6271. 44 ±963.02
10287.39 ±1048.32
865.71 ±118.49
1378.59 ±167.03
321.11 ±37.63
360.57 ±48.27
0.00 ±23. 10
93.63 ±15.84
41.90±6.15
71.15±7.88
24.62 ±1.90
151.49±21.94
2.64 ±0.37
54.54 ±4.92
52.79 ±5.81
15.66 ±2.33
10.73 ±1.25
4.22 ±0.72
29.91 ±3.08
162.52 ±16.73
W6-3
9.97 ±0.53
1.484±0.165
1.948 ±0.227
0.983 ±0.198
0.601 ±0.172
0.003 ±0.020
4.996 ±0.362
1.681 ±0.346
0.022 ±0.015
8.203 ±0.543
0.0180 ±0.0236
0.0105 ±0.0233
0.0144 ±0.0157
0.0363 ±0.0023
0.3340 ±0.0171
0.0043 ±0.0013
0.0019 ±0.0022
0.0817 ±0.0043
0.0011 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0055 ±0.0012
0.0008 ±0.0033
0.0741 ±0.0063
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0010 ±0.0009
0.0031 ±0.0008
0.0255 ±0.0025
0.0027 ±0.0029
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0033 ±0.0009
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0005 ±0.0016
0.0008 ±0.0011
0.0008 ±0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0026
0.0032 ±0.0032
0.0011 ±0.0025
0.0000 ±0.0034
0.0000 ±0.0027
0.0028 ±0.0032
0.0022 ±0.0033
0.0130 ±0.0077
0.0087 ±0.0183
0.0034 ±0.0035
0.0000 ±0.0013
0.0012 ±0.0025
0.0051 ±0.0024
0.0023 ±0.0033
0.05 ±0.01
0.81 ±0.04
983.66 ±153.93
2770.00 ±282.68
122.78 ±15.84
422.23 ±57.94
503.06 ±61. 06
26.45 ±3.25
71. 38 ±9.59
78.90 ±33.95
163.25±21.89
76.33 ±8.96
17.49 ±1.95
9.40 ±0.73
60.49 ±8.78
0.92 ±0.15
23.32 ±2. 12
23. 12 ±2.55
7.45 ±1.11
3.63 ±0.43
2.07 ±0.36
3.81 ±1.00
56.83 ±5.87
B2-7
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description W3-1 W3-2 W3-3 W4
Dibenzothiophene 1 .90 ± 0.23 2.31 ± 0.28 3.35 ± 0.43 1 .06 ±
Anthracene 94.40 ± 12.76 27.82 ± 3.75 8.65 ±1.17 6.38
A-methylfluorene 30.39 ± 3.31 13.13 ± 1.44 16.03 ±1.76 9.38
1-methylfluorene 20.15 ± 2.31 10.56 ±1.22
B-methylfluorene 6.39 ±1.19 3.61 ± 0.68
Xanthone 14.10 1.96 0.31 ±0.08
Acenaphthenequinone 8.39 1 .05 0.00 ± 0.06
2-methylanthracene 18.71 1.88 4.22 ±0.43
3-methylphenanthrene 40.85 3.01 18.02± 1.34 .
9-methylphenanthrene 19.19 1.91 8.29 ±0.83
1-methylphenanthrene 28.70 4.81 12.09 ± 2.02
Anthrone 0.00 0.06 0.43 ± 0.12
Anthraquinone 40.72 5.48 1 1 .20 ± 1 .46
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene 5.86 0.61 2.52 ± 0.27
A-dimethylphenanthrene 7.96 0.85 4.23 ± 0.46
B-dimethylphenanthrene 4.31 0.46 2.24 ± 0.26
C-dimethylphenanthrene 1 1 .90 ± 0.98 4.64 ± 0.39
D-dimethylphenanthrene 3.32 ± 0.36 1 .53 ± 0.18
1 ,7-dimethylphenanthrene 8.21 ± 0.66 2.78 ± 0.23
E-dimethylphenanthrene 5.55 ± 0.50 2.24 ± 0.21
9-methylanthracene 1 .37 ± 0.23 0.00 ± 0.06
Pyrene 96.81 ± 8.41 44.24 ± 3.87
9-Anthraaldehyde 0.33 ± 0.10 0.01 ± 0.06
Retene 0.23 ± 0.09 0.20 ± 0.09
Benzonaphthothiophene 0.10 ± 0.12 0.06 ± 0.12
1+3-methylfluoranthene 4.79 ± 0.58 1 .91 ± 0.24
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py 4.81 ± 0.45 2.23 ± 0.22
B-MePy/MeFI 8.36 ± 0.66 2.68 ± 0.22
C-MePy/MeFI 6.24 ± 0.47 1 .86 ± 0.15
D-MePy/MeFI 4.08 ± 0.46 1 .66 ± 0.20
4-methylpyrene 3.19 ± 0.32 1.45 ± 0.16
1-methylpyrene 3.00 ± 0.26 1 .25 ± 0.12
Benzo(c)phenanthrene 3.69 ± 0.43 1 .68 ± 0.22
Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene 40.60 ± 3.18 18.30 ± 1.49
Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene 12.02 ± 1 .37 2.69 ± 0.34
Benz(a)anthracene 14.89 ± 1 .60 4.82 ± 0.61
Triphenylene 0.00 ± 0.06 0.35 ± 0.07
Benzanthrone 35.34 ± 5.66 19.17 ± 3.07
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene 0.1 1 ± 0.09 0.00 ± 0.06
3-methylchrysene 1 .71 ± 0.15 0.56 ± 0.07
Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione 7.02 ± 1 .37 4.99 ± 1 .00
5+6-methylchrysene 0.44 ± 0.08 0.13 ± 0.06
Benzo(b+j4fc)fluoranthene 19.34 ±4.04 16.76 ± 3.61
Benzo(a)fluoranthene 2.40 ± 0.49 1 .47 ± 0.29
BeP 16.80 ±1.63 7.16±0.76
BaP 16.78 ±1.47 4.95±0.50
Perylene 3.36 ± 0.47 0.89 ± 0.18
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene 0.00 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.06
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one 0.00 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.06
Dibenzo(a,j)anthracene 1 .26 ± 0.25 0.61 ± 0.13
lndeno[123-cd]pyrene 19.27 ± 3.69 8.97 ±1.74
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene 1.16 ± 0.16 0.60 ± 0.10
Benzo(b)chrysene 1 .03 ± 0.22 0.00 ± 0.06
Picene 2. 14 ±0.39 0.00 ±0.06
Benzo(ghi)perylene 37.46 ± 4.95 5.49 ± 0.75
Anthanthrene 3.02 ± 0.45 0.27 ± 0.07
Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene 1 .55 ± 0.22 0.54 ± 0.09
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene 0.44 ±0.10 1 .1 1 ± 0.21
Coronene 15.11 ±1.98 6.89 ±0.91
Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene 0.00 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.06
nitro-PAH (ua/mile)
1-nitronaphthalene 0.1798 ± 0.0184 0.0000 ± 0.0028 0.
2-nitronaphthalene 0.4275 ± 0.0550 0.0777 ± 0.0120 0.
2-nitrobiphenyl 0.01 17 ± 0.0023 0.0030 ± 0.0008 0.
3-nitrobiphenyl 0.0300 ± 0.0052 0.0023 ± 0.0006 0.
4-nitrobiphenyl 0.0000 ± 0.0013 0.0000 ± 0.0013 0.
2-nitrofluorene 0.0015 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.
1 ,3-dinitronaphthalene 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.
.42 ±1.67 6.98
64 ±0.70 1.87
.75 ± 1.49
00 ±0.17
52 ±0.30
1.50
61 ±0.68
.01 ±2.02
00 ±0.16
13 ±0.21
09 ±0.36
88 ± 0.54
72 ±0.25
86 ±0.36
31 ±0.22
17 ±0.24
81 ±0.23
00 ±0.16
.42 ± 2.79
00 ±0.16
00 ±0.23
03 ±0.32
39 ± 0.24
89 ± 0.24
87 ±0.22
14±0.18
53 ± 0.24
40 ±0.22
86 ±0.18
15±0.16
.38 ±1.48
32 ±0.23
09 ±0.58
00 ±0.16
66 ±0.33
00 ±0.16
26 ±0.16
52 ±0.20
05 ±0.16
54 ± 0.94
74 ±0.21
65 ± 0.34
75 ±0.55
41 ±0.18
00 ±0.16
00 ±0.16
14±0.16
23 ± 1 .24
03 ±0.16
20 ±0.17
14±0.16
31 ±1.01
49 ±0.18
00 ±0.16
60 ±0.20
69 ±0.51
00 ±0.16
32
45
34
i
25
95
00
42
63
89
48
56
27
73
08
53
.51
18
58
04
02
10
41
11
73
76
91
22
.88
31
24
00
15
11
46
23
17
36
84
33
20
81
00
00
08
62
00
00
09
09
17
25
49
08
00
W4-2 W4-3 WS-1 WS-2 WS-3 W6-1 W6-2 W6-3
13 0.99 ±0.13 1 .71 ± 0.21 1 .73 ± 0.22 9.18 ± 1 .1 1 7.38 ± 0.89 46.86 ± 5.62
86
04
81
35
60
08
34
.83
63
33
.04
60
28
10
.07
38
15
23
19
10
.34
.84
12
08
26
.21
28
16
21
.19
.18
05
.62
38
86
.04
15
07
.05
25
04
48
.17
.28
27
12
.04
.04
04
51
.04
.04
04
69
.05
.05
.10
27
04
04 ± 1 .23 28.35 ± 3.85 70.59 ± 9.64 232.54 ± 31 .62 174.01 ± 23.59 108.81 ± 14.86 1
33 ± 0.50 20.61 ± 2.27 33.07 ± 3.64 109.08 ± 1 1 .87 55.81 ± 6.07 38.67 ± 4.25
07 ± 0.60 14.07 ± 1 .64 24.97 ± 2.90 59.83 ± 6.89 36.92 ± 4.25 31 .66 ± 3.68
15 ±0.23 3.97 ±0.75 8.40 ±1.58 21. 20 ±3.96 15.50 ±2.90 11. 20 ±2. 11
.52 ± 1 .47 6.98 ± 0.97 6.45 ± 0.92 46.52 ± 6.53 28.17 ± 3.95 8.63 ± 1 .23
03 ± 0.63 4.00 ± 0.51 0.00 ± 0.08 1 1 .34 ± 1 .47 12.13 ± 1 .55 0.00 ± 0.14
35 ± 0.65 8.50 ± 0.87 13.44 ± 1 .37 47.62 ± 4.82 30.25 ± 3.05 17.93 ± 1 .83
72 ±0.68 15.05 ±1.51 16. 12 ±1.63 64.41 ±6.46 41. 22 ±4. 11 33.77 ±3.41
.87 ± 2.34 23.57 ± 3.97 24.48 ± 4.14 73.95 ± 12.48 42.30 ± 7.14 55.76 ± 9.44
74 ±0.17 1 .02 ± 0.23 0.00 ± 0.08 3.09 ± 0.68 0.00 ± 0.14 1 .18 ± 0.30
.01 ±4.22 23.71 ±3.20 2.60 ±0.49 8.38 ±1.30 90.53 ±12.51 31.21 ±4.42
13 ± 0.54 7.67 ± 0.80 6.28 ± 0.66 20.60 ± 2.14 6.59 ± 0.70 9.73 ± 1 .03
77 ± 0.84 9.46 ±1.02 7.63 ± 0.83 26.59 ± 2.87 7.88 ± 0.86 19.79 ± 2.16
98 ± 0.13 3.85 ± 0.42 1 .00 ± 0.14 7.89 ± 0.91 8.75 ± 1 .00 7.74 ± 0.90
.92 ± 0.92 12.66 ± 1 .06 9.73 ± 0.83 36.27 ± 3.03 14.24 ±1.19 23.77 ± 2.01
21 ± 0.36 4.27 ± 0.47 2.37 ± 0.28 9.57 ± 1 .07 4.29 ± 0.49 7.10 ± 0.80
80 ± 0.56 7.80 ± 0.64 5.81 ± 0.49 21 .41 ± 1 .77 7.99 ± 0.67 14.60 ± 1 .22
02 ± 0.46 5.80 ± 0.53 3.66 ± 0.35 14.64 ± 1 .35 5.90 ± 0.55 10.39 ± 0.97
75 ± 0.14 0.80 ±0.15 1 .00 ± 0.19 3.14 ± 0.54 2.09 ± 0.38 1 .52 ± 0.29
.04 ± 3.32 47.37 ± 4.21 76.98 ± 7.01 321 .20 ± 28.88 227.09 ± 20.30 241 .66 ± 21 .90
36 ± 0.11 0.60 ± 0.18 0.00 ± 0.08 0.83 ± 0.28 12.77 ± 3.39 22.38 ± 5.93
22 ± 0.09 0.19 ± 0.09 0.31 ± 0.12 0.66 ± 0.23 1.14 ± 0.28 5.20 ± 0.96
04 ± 0.12 0.03 ± 0.12 0.00 ± 0.15 0.00 ± 0.28 0.00 ± 0.27 0.00 ± 0.27
51 ± 0.45 4.38 ± 0.56 4.44 ± 0.60 10.78 ± 1 .43 8.74 ±1.16 14.04 ± 1 .86
07 ± 0.40 5.30 ± 0.52 4.68 ± 0.48 12.02 ±1.22 9.17 ± 0.94 13.55 ±1.39
17 ± 0.43 7.79 ± 0.65 7.99 ± 0.69 19.79 ± 1 .70 20.91 ± 1 .78 19.78 ± 1 .70
29 ± 0.26 6.22 ± 0.49 5.62 ± 0.47 13.79 ±1.14 16.88 ±1.38 13.55 ±1.12
73 ± 0.33 3.71 ± 0.45 3.49 ± 0.45 9.77 ± 1 .23 7.52 ± 0.95 1 1 .79 ± 1 .50
92 ± 0.21 2.95 ± 0.32 3.31 ± 0.38 8.72 ± 0.99 8.26 ± 0.93 1 1 .17 ± 1 .27
88 ± 0.18 2.52 ± 0.24 2.70 ± 0.27 7.09 ± 0.70 6.69 ± 0.66 1 1 .99 ± 1 .17
74 ± 0.23 2.09 ± 0.27 0.00 ± 0.08 7.30 ± 1 .04 8.31 ±1.16 12.35 ± 1 .73
.72 ± 1 .54 26.46 ± 2.22 46.58 ± 4.1 1 120.31 ± 10.53 141 .95 ± 12.33 80.84 ± 7.14
20 ± 0.27 5.25 ± 0.68 1 1 .21 ± 1 .79 56.52 ± 8.97 42.22 ± 6.69 99.99 ± 15.89
64 ± 0.57 10.50 ± 1 .28 13.02 ± 1 .88 27.81 ± 3.99 36.60 ± 5.23 40.96 ± 5.88
00 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.13
.41 ± 1 .84 6.96 ±1.13 0.00 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.13
04 ± 0.06 0.30 ± 0.18 0.00 ± 0.08 0.30 ± 0.23 0.77 ± 0.46 0.00 ± 0.13
42 ± 0.07 1.27 ± 0.12 0.89 ± 0.12 3.73 ± 0.42 3.52 ± 0.39 3.38 ± 0.38
84 ± 0.55 1 .41 ± 0.29 0.93 ± 0.21 5.25 ± 1 .07 17.42 ± 3.48 5.26 ± 1 .07
13 ± 0.06 0.29 ± 0.07 0.34 ± 0.10 1.03 ± 0.23 1.21 ± 0.25 0.00 ± 0.13
.05 ± 2.06 27.29 ± 5.75 2.13 ± 0.52 15.93 ± 3.51 28.65 ± 6.21 60.55 ± 13.04
89 ± 0.18 5.83 ±1.18 0.22 ± 0.09 2.76 ± 0.58 3.66 ± 0.77 7.07 ± 1 .45
96 ± 0.49 8.69 ± 0.73 4.82 ± 0.55 29.13 ± 3.26 39.44 ± 4.39 24.90 ± 2.80
09 ± 0.38 9.10 ± 0.77 4.36 ± 0.48 35.56 ± 3.41 50.61 ±4.80 32.84 ± 3.17
92 ± 0.15 2.01 ± 0.33 1 .16 ± 0.24 6.13 ± 1 .16 8.32 ± 1 .57 8.66 ± 1 .63
79 ± 0.26 0.52 ± 0.19 6.51 ±1.73 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.13
00 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.14 0.00 ± 0.13
40 ± 0.10 0.34 ± 0.09 0.00 ± 0.08 2.66 ± 0.54 5.05 ± 1 .00 1 .90 ± 0.40
51 ± 1 .08 9.42 ± 1 .83 3.16 ± 0.63 40.30 ± 7.81 59.27 ± 1 1 .46 87.92 ± 17.03
37 ± 0.08 0.42 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.08 2.04 ± 0.30 2.93 ± 0.40 1 .83 ± 0.28
00 ± 0.06 0.13 ± 0.07 0.00 ± 0.08 0.35 ± 0.17 1.87 ± 0.42 1.16 ± 0.29
00 ± 0.06 0.43 ± 0.10 0.00 ± 0.08 1 .30 ± 0.27 1 .33 ± 0.28 1 .57 ± 0.32
87 ±1.19 10.20 ±1.37 6.08 ±0.85 84.08 ±11. 13 118.47 ±15.63 94 .43 ±12.55
17 ± 0.06 0.99 ± 0.16 0.00 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.14 12.44 ± 1 .81 1 1 .43 ± 1 .68
56 ± 0.09 1.35 ± 0.19 0.41 ± 0.10 2.59 ± 0.38 6.08 ± 0.83 2.61 ± 0.38
78 ±0.16 1 .95 ± 0.36 0.00 ± 0.08 7.07 ± 1 .30 12.70 ± 2.32 3.02 ± 0.57
70 ± 0.62 6.56 ± 0.85 5.55 ± 0.74 46.42 ± 6.14 74.44 ± 9.81 24.30 ± 3.23
00 ± 0.06 0.07 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.14 4.57 ± 0.41 0.00 ± 0.13
01 ± 0.0160 0.0027 ± 0.0034 0.0168 ± 0.0046 0.0177 ± 0.0047 0.5800 ± 0.0544 0.2849 ± 0.0281 0.3013 ± 0.0293 0.0175 ± 0.0054 0
97 ± 0.0326 0.0436 ± 0.0079 0.0781 ± 0.0124 0.2786 ± 0.0370 0.8353 ± 0.1060 0.6360 ± 0.0812 0.5122 ± 0.0657 0.0369 ± 0.0079 0
86 ± 0.0018 0.0038 ± 0.0010 0.0057 ± 0.0013 0.0000 ± 0.0004 0.0095 ± 0.0020 0.0185 ± 0.0035 0.0039 ± 0.0011 0.0081 ± 0.0018 0
62±0.57 10.23 ±1.23
.68 ±14.78 16.63 ±2.28
.03 ±4.91 22.39 ±2.46
.23±4.29 17.16±1.99
.03 ±2.07 3.90 ±0.74
.70 ±1.80 8.92 ±1.27
00 ±0.15 0.00 ±0.09
.44 ±1.67 5.94 ±0.61
.91 ±3.34 29.30 ±2. 19
.66±2.08 11.13±1.12
.17±4.77 25.72±4.35
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
.62 ±2.54 11. 99 ±1.77
05 ±0.65 4.67 ±0.50
.57±1.16 7.25±0.79
03 ±0.48 2.84 ±0.33
.68 ±1.07 6.38 ±0.54
17±0.38 2.11 ±0.25
51 ±0.64 3.57 ±0.31
22 ±0.50 2.66 ±0.26
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
.63 ±6.30 37.27 ±3.39
.30 ±3.28 8.23 ±2. 18
00±0.19 0.07±0.11
33 ±0.28 0.27 ±0.17
94 ±0.79 2.51 ±0.34
13 ±0.73 3.21 ±0.34
96 ±0.69 3.41 ±0.30
36 ±0.46 2.07 ±0.19
10±0.53 2.13±0.28
92 ±0.46 1.82 ±0.22
87 ±0.40 1.96 ±0.20
44 ±0.38 1.69 ±0.25
.44 ± 1.36 11.91 ± 1.05
07 ±0.99 2.20 ±0.37
29 ±1.39 6.75 ±1.00
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
31 ±0.14 0.18±0.08
06 ±0.27 1.89 ±0.39
00 ±0.14 0.05 ±0.08
.81 ±3.70 19.54±4.22
69 ±0.38 0.55 ±0.14
32 ±0.62 7.04 ±0.79
09 ±0.89 4.27 ±0.48
72 ±0.54 1.05 ±0.22
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
00 ±0.14 2.79 ±0.56
00 ±0.14 0.04 ±0.08
00±0.14 0.13±0.09
00 ±0.14 0.24 ±0.09
.63 ±2.38 9.83 ±1.33
47 ±0.39 0.10 ±0.08
00±0.14 0.82±0.13
88 ±0.21 0.89 ±0.18
16 ±0.96 5.46 ±0.73
00 ±0.14 0.00 ±0.08
70±0.0092 0.1121 ±0.0128
31 ±0.0182 0.3106±0.0411
36 ±0.0027 0.0102 ±0.0021
30 ± 0.0021 0.0002 ± 0.0002 0.0058 ± 0.0011 0.0086 ± 0.0016 0.0285 ± 0.0049 0.0243 ± 0.0042 0.0390 ± 0.0067 0.0059 ± 0.0012 0.0050 ± 0.0010 0.0084 ± 0.0016
72 ± 0.0061 0.0000 ± 0.0011 0.0000 ± 0.0019 0.0000 ± 0.0013 0.0734 ± 0.0150 0.0000 ± 0.0025 0.1192 ± 0.0230 0.0244 ± 0.0069 0.0000 ± 0.0033 0.1153 ± 0.0223
30 ± 0.0010 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0012 ± 0.0002 0.0004 ± 0.0001 0.0046 ± 0.0006 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0131 ± 0.0013 0.0050 ± 0.0006 0.0116 ± 0.0012 0.0014 ± 0.0003
15 ± 0.0015 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0006 0.0039 ± 0.0014 0.0158 ± 0.0024 0.0098 ± 0.0019 0.0000 ± 0.0008 0.0000 ± 0.0010
1,5-dinitronaphthalene 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0022 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0012 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0044 ± 0.0007 0.0005 ± 0.0002 0.0012 ± 0.0003 0.0032 ± 0.0005
5-nitroacenaphthene 0.0043 ± 0.0013 0.0000 ± 0.0005 0.0071 ± 0.0015 0.0000 ± 0.0004 0.0000 ± 0.0005 0.0000 ± 0.0005 0.0147 ± 0.0026 0.0000 ± 0.0014 0.0272 ± 0.0039 0.0000 ± 0.0011 0.0000 ± 0.0012 0.0317 ± 0.0042
9-nitroanthracene 0.0639 ± 0.0099 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0091 ± 0.0016 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0143 ± 0.0024 0.2022 ± 0.0332 0.0158 ± 0.0028 0.0538 ± 0.0090 0.0008 ± 0.0004 0.0181 ± 0.0031 0.0196 ± 0.0034
4-nitrophenanthrene 0.0012 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0024 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0027 ± 0.0003 0.0015 ± 0.0002 0.0068 ± 0.0006 0.0001 ± 0.0001 0.0009 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0001
9-nitrophenanthrene 0.0042 ± 0.0006 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0234 ± 0.0035 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0065 ± 0.0010 0.0048 ± 0.0008 0.0084 ± 0.0013 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0046 ± 0.0007 0.0053 ± 0.0009 0.0000 ± 0.0001
1 ,8-dinitronaphthalene 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0048 ± 0.0007 0.0027 ± 0.0006 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0057 ± 0.0009 0.0041 ± 0.0008 0.0000 ± 0.0002
2-nitrofluoranthene 0.0305 ± 0.0035 0.0018 ± 0.0005 0.0140 ± 0.0016 0.0135 ± 0.0015 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0152 ± 0.0017 0.0273 ± 0.0032 0.0000 ± 0.0004 0.0229 ± 0.0027 0.0623 ± 0.0069 0.0221 ± 0.0026 0.0000 ± 0.0002
3-nitrofluoranthene 0.0051 ± 0.0004 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0635 ± 0.0045 0.0043 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0041 ± 0.0003 0.0022 ± 0.0003 0.0256 ± 0.0019 0.1186 ± 0.0084 0.0073 ± 0.0006 0.0024 ± 0.0003 0.0080 ± 0.0006
1-nitropyrene 0.3259 ± 0.0380 0.0049 ± 0.0009 0.0542 ± 0.0052 0.0499 ± 0.0061 0.0674 ± 0.0077 0.0301 ± 0.0037 0.2510 ± 0.0307 0.1122 ± 0.0139 0.6285 ± 0.0759 0.0903 ± 0.0112 0.0507 ± 0.0064 0.1771 ± 0.0217
7-nitrobenzo(a)anthracene 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0084 ± 0.0012 0.0009 ± 0.0003 0.0049 ± 0.0008 0.0023 ± 0.0005 0.0603 ± 0.0082 0.0350 ± 0.0049 0.0000 ± 0.0003 0.0807 ± 0.0109 0.0233 ± 0.0033 0.2039 ± 0.0272
6 itrochrysene 0.0049 ± 0.0008 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0199 ± 0.0023 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0020 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0301 ± 0.0048 0.0125 ± 0.0020 0.0341 ± 0.0054 0.0904 ± 0.0143 0.0137 ± 0.0022 0.0574 ± 0.0091
B2-8
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
6-nitrobenz[a]pyrene
18a(H),21ll(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane &
17a(H),21ll(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),21IJ(H)-30-Norhopane
17a(H),21IJ(H)-Hopane
17fc(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-17a(H),21R(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30-Homohopane
17li(H),21li(H>Hopane
22S-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22S-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31,32-Trisomohop
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31,32-Trishomoho
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14IJ(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-cholestane
ster45-t40(cholestane)
C28-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan
C29-20R5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-stigmastan
C29-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-stigmastan
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan
Alkanes (uq/milej
Dodecane
Tridecane
Norfarnesane
Heptylcyclohexane
Farnesane
Tetradecane
Octylcyclohexane
Pentadecane
Nonylcyclohexane
Hexadecane
Heptadecane
Decylcyclohexane
Heptadecane_Pristane
Undecylcyclohexane
Phytane
Dodecylcyclohexane
Nonadecane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Eicosane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Heneicosane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Docosane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Tricosane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Tetracosane
Pentacosane
Nonadecylcyclohexane
Hexacosane
Eicosylcyclohexane
Heptacosane
Heneicosylcyclohexane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Triacontane
Hentriacontane
Dotriacontane
Tritriacontane
Tetratriacontane
Pentatriacontane
Hexatriacontane
Heptatriacontane
Octatriacontane
Nonatriacontane
Polar compounds fug/mile)
heptanoic acid (c7)
me-malonic (d-c3)
guaiacol
benzole acid
octanoic acid (c8)
phenylacetic acid
maleic acid
succinic acid (d-c4)
W3-1
0.0000 ±0.0001
1.15±0.14
0.47 ±0.16
4. 19 ±0.81
2.68 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.06
1.55±0.18
0.85 ±0.20
0.28 ±0.08
0.72 ±0.22
0.52 ±0.09
0.24 ±0.08
0.16 ±0.07
0.08 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.06
0.48 ±0.12
0.42 ±0.10
0.24 ±0.09
0.08 ±0.07
0.15 ±0.07
0.21 ±0.07
0.23 ±0.07
0.00±1.12
0.39 ±0.10
0.23 ±0.08
75.95 ±20.82
46.82 ±7.02
10.86 ±2.50
9.22 ±1.77
43.89 ±8. 17
105.11 ±9.40
2.07 ±0.65
4.83 ±0.92
1.13 ±0.40
27. 10 ±2.30
26.65 ±2. 18
1.69 ±0.31
1 1 .74 ± 1 .24
1.99 ±0.50
13.59 ±2. 17
0.96 ±0.17
16.43 ±1.43
0.85 ±0.20
0.00 ±2. 10
1.74 ±0.36
6.05 ±0.61
1.26 ±0.38
0.34 ±1.79
1.24 ±0.27
3.68 ±0.56
1.32 ±0.23
0.00 ±1.60
1.91 ±1.37
1.61 ±0.44
0.00 ±0.68
0.46 ±0.09
5.28±1.13
0.42 ±0.11
1.26 ±0.83
5.25 ±1.03
2.11 ±0.78
1.70 ±0.53
1.18±0.33
0.73 ±0.20
0.82 ±0.27
0.04 ±0.10
0.40 ±0.22
0.16±0.12
0.04 ±0.13
0.93 ±0.32
0.00 ±1.90
7.51 ±1.66
-99.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±144.25
8.21 ±3.36
47.76 ±7.07
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±1.14
W3-2
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.83 ± 0
0.28 ± 3
3.06 ± 63
2.11± 41
0.00 ± 06
1 .86 ± 24
1.78± 40
0.00 ± 06
1.01± 30
0.37 ± 08
0.50 ± 3
0.22 ± 07
0.00 ± 06
0.09 ± 07
0.17± 07
0.18± 07
0.16± 07
0.01 ± 06
0.16± 07
0.12± 06
0.06 ± 06
0.16± 06
0.10± 06
0.09 ± 06
80.68 ± .01
3.24 ± 20
0.45 ± 26
9.43 ± 00
26.16± 00
1 .00 ± 44
13.34± 90
0.00 ± 20
18.05 ± 58
7.80 ± 75
0.62 ± 5
3.79 ± 47
1.56± 41
4.08 ± 82
0.65 ± 3
6.78 ± 64
0.20 ± 0
0.00 ± 76
0.53 ± 4
3.90 ± 43
0.47 ± 24
2.28 ± 99
0.73 ± 6
6.91 ± 79
0.53 ± 2
0.00 ± 79
5.46 ± 20
1.86± 43
1.75± 76
0.13± 06
3.17± 67
0.01 ± 06
0.48 ± 82
2.36 ± 46
0.72 ± 61
0.64 ± 29
0.45 ± 27
0.00 ± 0
0.39 ± 23
0.00 ± 07
0.13± 20
0.00 ± 06
0.13± 4
0.00 ± 06
0.00 ± 7
0.00 ± 1
-99.00 ± 06
0.00 ±6 19
0.00 ± 5
7.96 ± 46
0.00 ± 30
0.00 ± 45
W3-3
0.0000 ±0.0002
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.18
1.44 ±0.37
1.23 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.34 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.11 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.02 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
218.04±27.17
87.74 ±16.20
1.22 ±0.48
28.04 ±5. 18
115.93±9.71
4.31 ±1.38
29.56 ±3.87
1.81 ±0.64
93.08 ±5.52
16.46 ±1.45
0.84 ±0.30
8.50 ±0.96
3.08 ±0.79
10.01 ±1.84
2.09 ±0.35
9.76 ±0.89
0.18±0.19
33.57 ±4.43
0.18±0.17
4. 18 ±0.50
0.00 ±0.37
2.46 ±3. 18
1.01 ±0.28
3.21 ±0.74
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±3.02
1.92 ±1.20
0.56 ±0.34
0.43 ±0.97
0.21 ±0.16
2.11 ±0.71
0.09 ±0.16
4.60 ±1.56
0.82 ±0.53
1.45 ±1.17
0.00 ±0.33
1.97 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.18
0.69 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.18
0.29 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.18
0.40 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±3.00
0.00 ±0.54
-99.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±255.72
4.97 ±4.59
15.74 ±3.20
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.84
W4-1 W4-2 W4-3
0.0030 ±0.0003 0.0000 ±0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001
0.21 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.70 ±0.16
0.47 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.04
0.27 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.11 ±0.05
0.13 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.03 ±0.05
0.05 ±0.04
0.09 ±0.05
0.09 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.04
0.02 ±0.04
0.06 ±0.04
0.20 ±0.05
0.10 ±0.04
0.07 ±0.04
124.83 ±16.28
32.40 ±6.31
0.00 ±0.15
9.33 ±1.98
47.78 ±4.76
1.84 ±0.55
15.83 ±2. 18
0.00 ±0.13
15.79 ±1.60
6.77 ±0.67
0.14 ±0.07
6.00 ±0.68
2.55 ±0.59
6.94 ±1.19
0.33 ±0.08
6.99 ±0.65
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±1.43
0.38 ±0.11
2.96 ±0.34
0.21 ±0.15
0.00±1.13
1.39 ±0.28
2.50 ±0.42
0.46 ±0.11
0.00 ± 1.20
0.71 ±0.64
0.61 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.38
0.04 ± 0.04
0.26 ±0.31
0.08 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.56
0.63 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.39
0.05 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.06
0.17±0.15
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.08
0.33 ±0.13
0.30 ±1.56
0.40 ±0.21
-99.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±105.49
0.00 ± 1.66
7.58 ±1.29
0.00 ±0.17
0.20 ±0.40
15 ±0.06 0.63 ±0.09
00 ±0.07 0.44 ±0.15
51 ±0.13 2.43 ±0.46
33±0.10 1.16±0.23
00 ±0.06 0.03 ±0.06
36±0.08 1.37±0.17
25±0.08 1.21 ±0.27
00 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
06 ±0.06 0.28 ±0.10
14 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
11 ±0.07 0.41 ±0.11
00 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
00 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
03 ±0.07 0.10 ±0.08
09 ±0.06 0.35 ±0.09
06 ±0.06 0.14 ±0.06
03 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
00 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
07 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
06 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
09 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
25 ±0.07 0.09 ±0.06
08 ±0.06 0.15 ±0.07
16 ±0.07 0.06 ±0.06
48 ±16.55 53.80 ±15.76
.76 ±9.78 57.47 ±8.34
99±2.36 28.25±4.86
15 ±0.71 4.22 ±0.90
48±1.12 26.97±5.16
.25 ±2. 19 104.54 ±9.52
00 ±0.26 0.00 ±0.19
39 ±0.88 47.94 ±5.98
00 ±0.21 0.00 ±0.16
.55 ±1.73 44.20 ±3.60
64 ±0.45 32.60 ±2.42
04 ±0.08 1.74 ±0.32
81 ±0.38 22.83 ±2.35
49±0.19 4.65±1.04
91 ±0.67 20.65 ±3.20
44 ±0.08 2.27 ±0.35
70 ±0.48 31. 25 ±2.67
26±0.11 1.33±0.26
00±2.06 10.11 ±2.81
27 ±0.28 2.09 ±0.38
58±0.40 10.82 ±1.03
13±0.35 1.40±0.41
00 ±1.64 2.73 ±2.08
21 ±0.24 2.51 ±0.43
66 ±0.43 6.56 ±0.82
86 ±0.15 2.01 ±0.33
00 ±1.54 0.00 ±1.71
00 ±0.66 0.99 ±0.94
73 ±0.27 1.26 ±0.38
00 ±0.49 0.00 ±0.61
03 ±0.06 0.22 ±0.07
00 ±0.24 1.56 ±0.51
03 ±0.06 0.18 ±0.07
00 ±0.72 0.00 ±0.71
76 ±0.26 0.81 ±0.27
00 ±0.53 0.38 ±0.54
00±0.14 0.00±0.13
00 ±0.24 0.00 ±0.23
00 ±0.07 0.00 ±0.07
13 ±0.21 2.34 ±0.47
00 ±0.07 0.00 ±0.07
00±0.19 0.00±0.16
00 ±0.06 0.46 ±0.21
12±0.13 0.00±0.12
00 ±0.06 0.00 ±0.06
00±1.86 0.00±1.13
20 ±0.41 4.29 ±1.03
9.00 ±0.06 -99.00 ±0.06
00 ±88. 17 0.00 ±105.54
84 ±2.34 1.31 ±2.40
28 ±1.23 6.42 ±1.26
00 ±0.22 0.00 ±0.16
00 ±0.49 0.00 ±0.67
W5-1
0.0000 ±0.0001
1.49 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.10
2.25 ±0.52
1.49 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.08
0.95 ±0.15
0.67 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.33 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.24 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
86.48 ±23.56
85.39 ±11. 82
20.37 ±4.41
19.72 ±3.64
44. 15 ±8.35
144.72 ±13.28
4.67 ±1.25
64. 18 ±8. 13
4.11 ±1.01
51. 06 ±4.66
28.26 ± 2.44
3.00 ±0.56
16.71 ±1.81
1.78 ±0.53
15.89 ±2.68
1.39 ±0.25
20.34 ±1.84
1.40 ±0.31
0.00 ±3.24
2. 13 ±0.46
7.93 ±0.92
2.48 ±0.91
0.00 ±2.39
4. 16 ±0.90
0.00 ±0.83
0.31 ±0.12
0.00 ±2.32
0.00 ±1.45
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.75
0.73 ±0.14
1.65 ±0.75
0.76 ±0.20
0.00 ±1.26
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.82
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±1.60
0.00 ±0.34
-99.00 ±0.08
0.00±112.60
0.00 ±2.64
31. 20 ±4.92
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.85
W5-2
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.17
7.34 ±1.62
5.58±1.13
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.73 ±0.26
0.46 ±0.17
0.65 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
421.68±100.88
0.00 ±2.02
327. 16 ±58.96
9.84 ±1.96
223.92 ±40.66
464.74 ± 39.72
9.90 ±2.52
196.76 ±23.77
4.16±1.12
109.74 ±9.05
95.89 ±7.66
6.17±1.13
25.95 ±2.74
1.37 ±0.57
28.71 ±4.67
3.60 ±0.57
41. 29 ±3.58
2.00 ±0.43
15.66 ±5.32
2.30 ±0.51
14. 19 ±1.49
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±4.09
3.87 ±0.86
6. 30 ±1.44
3.48 ±0.80
0.00 ± 3.44
5. 10 ±2.46
2. 14 ±0.75
0.00 ±1.33
0.74 ±0.18
3.32±1.19
0.18±0.15
2.31 ±2.00
9.58 ±2.24
0.04 ±1.47
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.48
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.84
0.00 ±0.22
-99.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±120.43
0.00 ±3. 17
61. 85 ±9.75
0.00 ±1.42
0.00 ±1.78
WS-3
0.0067 ±0.0006
2.01 ±0.26
0.43 ±0.22
7.73 ±1.69
5.01 ±1.01
0.00 ±0.14
2.51 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.81 ±0.28
0.45 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
1.25 ±0.26
1.65 ±0.47
0.74 ±0.21
0.65 ±0.18
0.40 ±0.17
0.39 ±0.20
1.53 ±0.40
0.30 ±0.15
0.96 ±0.22
2.30 ±0.34
0.87 ±0.22
0.74 ±0.21
163.35±41.54
343.54 ±61. 75
3.42 ±0.85
103.23 18.98
234.56 20.50
7.74 2.08
38.86 5.23
3.07 0.92
66.92 5.79
14.51 1.41
0.26 0.26
6.33 0.81
0.37 0.38
5. 24 ±1.34
0.12±0.17
8.65 ±0.89
0.37 ±0.21
22.08 ±5.60
1.05 ±0.29
7.60 ±0.91
0.00 ±0.58
14.58 ±5.53
2.52 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.93
4.63 ±1.04
0.00 ±3.89
0.00 ±1.68
4.02 ±1.11
7.12±1.89
0.30 ±0.15
7.00 ±1.78
0.96 ±0.27
6.94 ±2.51
6.35 ±1.65
3.51 ±1.99
0.00 ±0.60
2.83 ±0.86
0.00 ±0.28
1.96 ±0.84
0.00 ±0.24
1.62 ±0.74
0.00 ±0.16
0.52 ±0.46
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±3. 16
0.00 ±0.37
-99.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±227.01
0.00±4.17
3.91 ±1.64
0.00±1.17
0.00 ±2.63
W6-1
0.0000 ±0.0001
12.58 ±1.36
9.75 ±2.02
47. 16 ±9.66
29. 18 ±5.69
1.70 ±0.47
21. 04 ±2.68
17.26 ±3.84
2. 19 ±0.43
12.50 ±3.53
8.03 ±1.04
6.66 ±1.48
2.77 ±0.52
0.25 ±0.14
4.64 ±1.23
6.32 ±1.27
5.54 ±0.87
2.96 ±0.71
3.37 ±0.95
2. 15 ±0.54
3.32 ±0.49
4.41 ±0.84
7.79 ±1.04
6.02 ±1.24
3.27 ±0.70
1.92 ±5.63
138. 13 ±25.40
0.40 ±0.37
29.59 ±5.80
120.91 ±11.37
4.99 ±1.53
50.02 ±6.56
3.05 ±0.91
93.23 ±7.87
34.23 ± 2.94
5.05 ±0.96
12.77 ±1.44
1.38 ±0.56
16. 19 ±2.86
3.25 ±0.53
37.51 ±3.29
2.91 ±0.58
156.32 ±15.77
9.19±1.82
40.72 ±3.83
14. 19 ±3.47
109.39 ±15.60
4.45 ±0.97
16.75 ±2.23
3.97 ±0.90
15.56±6.11
3.31 ±2.18
3.85 ±1.07
32.03 ±3.99
5.79 ±0.90
0.10 ±0.68
0.31 ±0.16
35.28 ±6.21
10.72 ±2.42
14.39 ±3.82
0.00 ±0.59
8.54 ±1.56
0.00 ±0.19
5.15±1.26
0.00 ±0.21
4.16±1.06
0.00 ±0.13
1.68 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±1.86
0.00 ±0.25
-99.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±95.96
0.00 ±2.50
1.69 ±1.33
0.00 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.59
W6-2
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.88 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.16
1.69 ±0.48
1.14 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.14
0.87 ±0.18
0.71 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.14
0.43 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.50 ±0.21
0.39 ±0.16
0.37 ±0.16
0.28 ±0.16
0.17±0.16
0.00 ±0.14
0.46 ±0.16
0.20 ±0.15
0.45 ±0.15
0.27 ±0.15
0.25 ±0.15
212. 13 ±52.76
22.83 ±4.76
1.16±0.50
79.96 ±14.83
209.27 ±18.56
0.00 ±0.47
78.00 ±9.82
2.50 ±0.83
59.64 ±5.32
31. 68 ±2.72
1.54 ±0.43
14.51 ±1.60
3.72 ±1.05
10.75 ±2. 10
0.52 ±0.20
15.21 ±1.43
0.90 ±0.28
40.83 ±6.89
0.87 ±0.26
6.25 ±0.81
0.77 ±0.76
26.79 ±6.72
0.39 ±0.18
0.33 ±1.04
1.02 ±0.30
7.92 ±5.50
0.00 ±1.33
1.85 ±0.70
14.21 ±2.46
0.47 ±0.16
2.64 ±1.07
0.39 ±0.18
7.58 ±2.59
3.48 ±1.16
2.88 ±1.89
0.00 ±0.31
1.59 ±0.72
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.58
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±2.25
0.00 ±0.54
-99.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±104.66
0.00 ±2.87
6.40 ±1.98
0.00 ±0.81
0.00 ±0.97
W6-3
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.73 ±0.11
0.09 ±0.13
1.95 ±0.46
1.42 ±0.30
0.16 ±0.09
1.02±0.15
0.91 ±0.23
0.13 ±0.08
0.63 ±0.20
0.38 ±0.09
0.22 ±0.10
0.06 ±0.08
0.42 ±0.11
1.50 ±0.42
0.95 ±0.21
0.21 ±0.09
0.13 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.08
0.09 ±0.08
0.16 ±0.08
0.21 ±0.08
0.17 ±0.09
0.10 ±0.08
0.00 ±3.06
420.00 ±51. 51
120.10±22.11
2.23 ±0.60
59.48 ±11. 09
221.99±19.57
6.03 ±1.52
75.51 ±9.44
5.28 ±1.22
57.35 ±5.09
30.40 ±2.59
0.85 ±0.23
17.24 ±1.85
4.86±1.18
15.98 ±2.70
2.40 ±0.39
22. 19 ±1.98
0.00 ±0.11
11. 34 ±4.43
1.22 ±0.29
7.30 ±0.86
1.14 ±0.66
2.87 ±3.92
0.17±0.10
0.00 ±0.76
0.17±0.10
0.00 ±2.46
0.00 ±1.07
2.28 ±0.72
0.00 ±1.06
0.78 ±0.15
0.86 ±0.64
0.05 ±0.08
0.00 ±1.30
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.88
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.08
1.29 ±3.62
1.07 ±0.56
-99.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±65.57
15.79 ±5.49
30. 12 ±4.77
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.91
B2-9
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
4-me-guaiacol
o-toluic
me-succinic acid (d-c4)
nonanoic acid (c9)
2,6-dimethylbenzoic acid
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid (d-c5)
2-methylglutaric (d-c5)
2,5-dimethylbenzoic acid
3-methylglutaric acid (d-c5)
2,3- and 3,5- dimethylbenzoic acid
decanoic acid (c10)
4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyl-syringol
3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
hexanedioic (adipic) acid (d-c6)
salcylic acid
trans-2-decenoic acid
cis-pinonic acid
3-methyladipic acid (d-c6)
4-formyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid (c11)
isoeugenol
heptanedioic (pimelic) acid (d-c7)
2,3-dimethoxybenzoic acid
acetovanillone
2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid
dodecanoic (lauric) acid (c12)
2,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
phthalic acid
suberic acid (d-c8)
levoglucosan
3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
syringaldehyde
3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
tridecanoic acid (c13)
isophthalic acid
vanillic acid
homovanillic acid
azelaic acid (d-c9)
myristoleic acid
myristic acid (c14)
sebacic acid (d-c10)
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid (c15)
undecanedioic acid (c11)
palmitoleic acid
palmitic acid (c16)
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid (d-c12)
traumatic acid
heptadecanoic acid (c17)
1,11-undecanedicarboxylic acid (d-c13)
oleic acid
elaidic acid
stearicacid(c18)
1,12-dodecanedicarboxylic acid (d-c14)
8,15-pimaradien-18-oic acd
pimaric acid
sandaracopimaric acid
nonadecanoic acid (c19)
isopimaric acid
palustric acid
dihydroisopimaric acid
8-abietic acid
dehydroabietic acid
8,14-abietenic acid
abietic acid
eicosanoic acid (c20)
levopimaric acid
heneicosanoic acid (c21)
7-oxodehydroabietic acid
docosanoic acid (c22)
tricosanoic acid (c23)
tetracosanoic acid (c24)
cholesterol
cholestanol
ergosterol
stigmasterol
sitosterol
W3-1
-99.00 ±0.06
62.03 ±13.95
0.00 ±0.16
6.60 ±3.60
7.03 ±1.65
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
7.77 ±1.70
0.00 ±0.13
6.03 ±1.59
0.45 ±0.26
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
16. 19 ±3.04
0.00 ±0.07
26.05 ±4.99
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.08
1.11 ±0.33
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±3.81
-99.00 ±-99.00
2.90 ±0.79
5. 18 ±0.93
0.00 ±0.07
14.98 ±12.31
0.00 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
3.97 ±0.91
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
8.11 ±1.41
0.55 ±0.23
2.53 ±6.76
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.18
0.08 ±0.09
1.58 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.07
2.05 ±0.45
1.07 ±0.35
#N/A
0.00 ±0.24
1.48 ±1.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.06
0.10 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.07
1.23 ±0.97
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±3.21
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
0.11 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.18
0.01 ±0.17
0.11 ±0.08
0.29 ±0.08
0.06 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.19
0.18±0.11
0.00 ±0.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W3-2
-99.00 ±0.06
9.53 ±2.71
0.00 ±0.06
1.44 ±3.01
0.00 ±0.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
1.38 ±0.69
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.66
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
4.47 ±1.09
0.00 ±0.10
1.51 ±1.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.19
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.08
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.63 ±0.41
0.18 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.06
0.45 ±4.33
0.00 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.23 ±0.32
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
3.37 ±0.61
0.12±0.18
0.00 ±2.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.24 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.06
0.08 ±0.17
0.18 ±0.25
#N/A
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.98
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.06
0.04 ± 0.24
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±3.30
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.11
0.09 ±0.19
0.02 ±0.12
0.17 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.06
0.05 ±0.06
0.16 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.12
0.08 ±0.11
0.03 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.08
0.02 ±0.07
0.60 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.21
0.12±0.11
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W3-3
-99.00 ±0.16
21. 83 ±6.50
0.00 ±0.17
0.41 ±4.88
0.05 ±0.47
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.50 ±0.69
3. 54 ±1.47
0.00 ±0.23
0.13±1.19
0.05 ±0.47
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
3.32 ±1.65
0.00 ±0.22
0.95 ±3. 12
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.47
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.77
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.55
32.64 ±3. 19
0.00 ±0.16
2.82 ±3.87
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
2.02 ±0.60
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±7. 16
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.17
16.66 ±1.75
0.00 ±0.18
21. 02 ±3.51
0.00 ±0.41
#N/A
0.00 ±0.50
12.96±2.11
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
0.09 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.17
0.88 ±1.25
0.00 ±0.29
1.91 ±6.79
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.17
0.31 ±0.29
0.37 ±0.52
13.04 ±2.22
0.00 ±0.17
0.02 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.19
0.01 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.21
0.03 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.30
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W4-1
-99.00 ±0.04
9.42 ± 2.48
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±2.41
0.00 ±0.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.02 ±0.05
2.30 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.06
0.57 ±0.52
0.31 ±0.21
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
4.04 ±0.89
0.12 ±0.09
6.96 ±1.82
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.05
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
4.09 ±0.82
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±2.74
0.00 ±0.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.78 ±0.42
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
3.08 ±0.55
0.49 ±0.17
0.00 ±3.31
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.10
0.40 ±0.13
3. 16 ±0.67
0.00 ±0.07
8.65 ±1.42
1.51 ±0.31
#N/A
0.27 ±0.34
3.68 ±1.04
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.23 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.68
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±2.70
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.06
1.01 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.15
1.29 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.04
0.07 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.04
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W4-2
-99.00 ±0.06
7.99 ±2.39
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±2.82
0.01 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.04 ±0.12
1.44 ±0.70
0.02 ±0.11
0.08 ±0.64
0.00 ±0.20
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
4.83±1.16
0.00 ±0.08
2.20 ±1.61
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.09
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.03 ±0.20
0.71 ±0.66
0.00 ±0.06
1.32 ±4. 11
0.00 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.26 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
1.04 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±3.51
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.07
0.06 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.07
0.85 ±0.28
0.35 ±0.22
#N/A
0.00 ±0.18
1.09 ±0.88
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.07
1.77 ±1.00
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±2.95
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.11
0.12 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W4-3
-99.00 ±0.06
8.74 ±2.56
0.00 ±0.06
2.34 ±3. 16
0.17 ±0.28
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.06 ±0.29
3.75 ±1.07
0.00 ±0.36
0.04 ±0.70
0.77 ±0.29
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
5.57 ±1.28
0.00 ±0.11
3.90 ±1.82
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.09
0.03 ±0.23
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.11
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.99 ±0.64
6.83 ±1.07
0.00 ±0.06
0.71 ±2.60
0.00 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
2.97 ±0.69
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.29 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±4.29
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.07
1.37 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.06
4.06 ±0.75
0.85 ±0.31
#N/A
0.10±0.18
1.77±1.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.07
1.49 ±0.91
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±3. 19
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.25
0.94 ±0.33
0.24 ±0.10
0.19 ±0.07
0.02 ±0.06
0.08 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.07
0.03 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.20
0.03 ±0.24
0.04 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W5-1
-99.00 ±0.09
26.21 ±6.59
0.00 ±0.13
0.43 ±4.08
1.06 ±0.57
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
4.58 ±1.31
0.00 ±0.12
0.02 ±1.09
0.00 ±0.28
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
5.81 ±1.66
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±2. 14
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.30
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.11
-99.00 ±-99.00
5.45 ±1.32
1.14 ±0.86
1.75 ±0.26
0.00 ±5.04
0.00 ±0.08
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.98 ±0.54
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
7.54 ±1.35
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±3.87
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.61
0.00 ±0.08
11. 36 ±1.92
0.00 ±0.35
#N/A
0.00 ±0.19
0.00±1.19
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±4.47
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.20
1.69 ±0.47
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.21
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W5-2
-99.00 ±0.15
79.36 ±18.92
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±4.02
11.14±2.97
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
15.08 ±3.34
0.00 ±0.20
5.52 ±3.07
0.00 ±0.31
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
19.90 ±4.76
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±2.70
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.32
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ± 0.44
0.00 ±0.79
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±29.98
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.21
2.52 ±0.56
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±4.64
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.67
0.00 ±0.14
6.95 ±1.41
0.00 ±0.46
#N/A
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±1.41
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±1.39
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±7.04
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.32
0.59 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.15
0.16±0.15
0.16±0.15
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.15
0.66 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.42
3.22 ±1.73
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.33
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
WS-3
-99.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.69
0.00 ±0.36
0.00 ±4.72
0.00 ±0.43
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.48
5.54 ±1.81
0.00 ±0.36
0.00 ±1.78
0.00 ±0.37
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
8.24 ±2.82
0.00 ±0.17
20.53 ±7.55
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.38
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±2.71
-99.00 ±-99.00
5.65 ±1.59
0.00 ±0.83
0.99 ±0.25
14.74 ±32.80
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
6.31 ±1.55
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.24
6.33±1.19
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±10.94
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.65
0.00 ±0.18
2.99 ±0.82
0.00 ±0.42
#N/A
0.00 ±0.31
0.00 ±1.36
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.39
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±1.04
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±6.60
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.16
0.23 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.42
0.10 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.15
0.16±0.15
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.40
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.52
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W6-1
-99.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±1.51
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±3.20
0.00 ±0.26
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.64
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.43
0.00 ±0.30
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.67
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.87
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.29
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.25
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±1.80
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.22
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
3.61 ±0.73
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±2.43
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.65
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.36
#N/A
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±1.25
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±1.25
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±6.59
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.23
0.00 ±0.37
0.00 ±0.28
0.24 ±0.19
0.08 ±0.14
0.49 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.47
0.55 ±0.30
0.76 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.22
0.14±0.16
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.80
0.00 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.32
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W6-2
-99.00 ±0.14
4.27 ±2.91
0.00 ±0.71
0.00 ±3.78
0.00 ±0.39
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
1.15±1.16
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.78
0.00 ±0.34
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00±1.18
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±1.05
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.34
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±2.54
-99.00 ±-99.00
18.59 ±3.83
0.00 ±0.80
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±2.25
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.16
29.39 ±5. 14
0.00 ±0.27
0.00 ±2.78
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.67
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.33
0.00 ±0.50
#N/A
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±1.41
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±1.63
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±7.89
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.25
0.62 ±0.37
1.16±0.88
1.99 ±0.58
0.35 ±0.22
0.09 ±0.15
0.46 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.31
0.76 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.14
2.65 ±1.03
0.83 ±0.30
1.40 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.53
0.00 ±0.48
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.34
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W6-3
-99.00 ±0.11
40.96 ±9.77
0.00 ±0.27
16.01 ±5.97
0.84 ± 0.54
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.10
17.46 ±3.41
0.00 ±0.36
10.15±2.61
11. 95 ±1.33
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
17.84 ±3.68
0.00 ±0.14
17.87 ±4.79
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.03 ±0.22
8.67 ±1.27
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.08 ±0.46
0.00 ±1.50
-99.00 ±-99.00
27.81 ±5.22
62.81 ±5.57
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±2.09
0.00 ±0.08
-99.00 ±-99.00
23.45 ±5. 15
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
44.04 ± 7.60
1.92 ±0.51
0.00 ±4.48
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.14
12.97 ±1.51
0.00 ±0.08
12.83 ±2. 15
0.43 ± 0.48
#N/A
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±1.41
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.84
0.00 ±0.24
0.00 ±6.63
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.15
3.28 ±0.75
0.11 ±0.39
0.38 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.11
0.04 ±0.08
0.48 ±0.12
0.08 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.19
0.44 ± 0.23
0.01 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.22
0.39 ±0.17
0.04 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.30
0.13 ±0.54
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.23
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
B2-10
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
Carbonvls (ma/mile)
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acetone
* acrolein
propionaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
Methacrolein
* n-butyraldehyde
benzaldehyde
glyoxal
valeraldehyde
tolualdehyde
hexanal
* acrolein converts to an unknown
1,3 butadiene (estimated)
C2 compounds
propene
propane
isoButane
IButene+iButylene
n-Butane
t-2-Butene
c-2-Butene
3-Me-1-Butene
isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Me-1-Butene
n-Pentane
t-2-Pentene
c-2-Pentene
2-Me-2-Butene
22DiMeButane
CycloPentene
CycloPentane
23DiMeButane
MTBE
2-MePentane
3-MePentane
2-Me-1-Pentene
1-Hexene
n-Hexane
t-2-Hexene
2-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Hexene
c-2-Hexene
t-3-Me-2-Pentene
MeCyPentane
2,4-DiMePentane
223TriMeButane
CycloHexane
4MeHexene
2MeHexane
23DiMePentane
3MeHexane
Cyclohexene
SEtPentane
1-Heptene
224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
2MeHeptane
4MeHeptane
3MeHeptane
Hexanal
225TMHexane
Octene-1
11DMeCyHexane
n-Octane
24DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
33DiMeHeptane
EtBenzene
m/p-xylene
W3-1 W3-2
221.82±12.36
130.33 ±12.39
200. 18 ±12.97
4.55 ±1.14
24.33 ±2.72
14.36 ±1.69
11. 20 ±2. 11
34. 15 ±3.85
0.08 ±0.02
126.70±12.71
1.15±0.27
6.72 ±0.91
64.57 ±10.45
9.96 ±1.27
i rear
11.059±6.112
256.860 ±36.271
63.793 ±7.736
1.677 ±0.084
8.893 ± 0.445
32.603 ±2.210
59.466 ±2.973
7.487 ±0.412
4.889 ±0.452
1.795 ±0.090
59.476 ±3.883
2.932 ±0.176
5.222 ±0.382
18.771 ±1.119
4.845 ± 0.242
2.631 ±0.229
47.566 ±2.548
4.056 ±0.263
1.822±0.112
2.632 ±0.132
7. 154 ±0.424
0.615 ±0.037
24.113±1.379
15.662 ±0.783
1.041 ±0.052
1.615±0.081
16.483 ±0.826
1.815±0.091
1.226 ±0.065
0.910 ±0.045
0.260 ±0.013
0.875 ± 0.044
1.546 ±0.077
11. 508 ±0.663
7.735 ±0.387
0.198 ±0.010
4.050 ±0.234
0.349 ±0.032
10.872 ±0.544
12.370 ±0.618
12.592 ±0.630
0.066 ±0.014
3.638 ±0.233
1.080 ±0.054
24.413±1.741
0.595 ±0.030
9.679 ± 0.484
0.259 ±0.014
4.956 ±0.248
3. 148 ±0.215
5.798 ±0.290
6.911 ±0.346
107.730 ±5.387
3.323 ±0.179
5.498 ±0.275
2.348 ±0.181
5.610 ±0.280
9.958 ±1.272
1.533 ±0.077
2.768 ±0.138
0.311 ±0.016
5.335 ±0.267
0.610 ±0.030
2.265±0.113
0.080 ±0.004
22.971 ±1.149
71.190±3.560
W3-3 W4-1 W4-2
25. 48 ±1.44
29.00 ±2.86
29.15±2.10
0.41 ±0.10
5.42 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.29
4. 12 ±0.87
3.89 ±0.52
0.05 ±0.01
17.48 ±1.80
0.77 ±0.16
3. 14 ±0.50
8. 37 ±1.44
4.49 ±0.61
1.827±1.010
34.717±4.902
10.538±1.278
0.784 ±0.039
2. 123 ±0.106
7.212 ±0.489
15.892 ±0.795
1.675 ±0.092
1.130±0.104
0.315 ±0.016
18.151 ±1.185
0.441 ±0.026
0.935 ±0.068
4.608 ±0.275
0.823 ±0.041
0.463 ± 0.040
1.650 ±0.088
0.805 ±0.052
0.311 ±0.019
0.554 ±0.028
2.091 ±0.124
0.128 ±0.008
5.572 ±0.319
3.777 ±0.189
0.215±0.011
0.281 ±0.014
3.734 ±0.187
0.511 ±0.026
0.365 ±0.019
0.254 ±0.013
0.050 ±0.003
0.185 ±0.009
0.405 ±0.020
2.621 ±0.151
3.052 ±0.153
0.062 ±0.003
0.929 ±0.054
0.068 ±0.006
2.749 ±0.137
5.119±0.256
3. 175 ±0.159
0.020 ±0.004
0.897 ±0.057
0.275 ±0.014
12.316 ±0.878
0.125 ±0.006
2.673 ±0.134
0.100 ±0.005
1.263 ±0.063
1.374 ±0.094
2.312±0.116
3.795 ±0.190
27.999 ±1.400
1.617±0.087
1.641 ±0.082
0.693 ±0.053
1.710±0.085
4.490 ±0.612
0.450 ±0.023
1.544 ±0.077
0.075 ±0.004
1.665 ±0.083
0.345 ±0.017
0.734 ±0.037
0.031 ±0.002
5.641 ±0.282
17.419±0.871
W4-3 W5-1 W5-2
304. 19 ±16.94
193.16±18.35
117.89±8.00
3.07 ±0.77
39. 19 ±4.44
8.92±1.19
20.94 ±3.78
25.22 ±2.87
0.30 ±0.07
93. 10 ±9.39
0.57 ±0.36
8.95 ±1.26
18.36 ±3. 16
1.99 ±0.93
5. 123 ±2.831
140.835 ±19.887
29.552 ±3.584
1.655 ±0.083
7.723 ±0.386
15.790±1.070
62.473 ±3. 124
5. 134 ±0.283
3. 123 ±0.289
0.922 ±0.046
60.547 ±3.953
1.833±0.110
2.788 ±0.204
17.860±1.064
3.983 ±0.199
2.045 ±0.178
4.600 ±0.246
3.573 ±0.231
1.158±0.071
2. 143 ±0.107
7.684 ± 0.456
0.285 ±0.017
23.420 ±1.340
15.653 ±0.783
0.893 ±0.045
1.329 ±0.066
13.922 ±0.697
1.921 ±0.096
1.183±0.062
0.830 ±0.042
0.267 ±0.013
0.971 ±0.049
1.455 ±0.073
10.773 ±0.621
10.214±0.511
0.219±0.011
4.339 ±0.251
0.316 ±0.029
10.365 ±0.518
17.567 ±0.878
11.841 ±0.592
0.050 ±0.010
3.458 ±0.221
1.942 ±0.097
30.049 ±2. 143
0.667 ±0.033
9.421 ±0.471
0.145 ±0.008
4.709 ±0.235
3.389 ±0.231
6.276 ±0.314
8.451 ±0.423
73.510 ±3.676
3.704 ±0.199
5. 145 ±0.257
2. 162 ±0.166
5.248 ±0.262
1.991 ±0.928
1.463 ±0.073
3.547 ±0.177
0.383 ±0.019
5.079 ±0.254
0.754 ±0.038
2.211 ±0.111
0.089 ±0.004
16.668 ±0.833
49.642 ± 2.482
WS-3 W6-1 W6-2 W6-3
58.66 ±3.46
130.75 ±13.02
136.52 ±10.00
1.94 ±0.49
11. 55 ±1.65
5.46 ±1.61
3.18±1.96
9.36 ±1.80
0.10 ±0.03
47.26 ±5.21
1.15±0.72
4.05 ±1.68
20.70 ±3.83
2.50 ±1.86
9.722 ±5.373
209.616 ±29.599
56.077 ±6.801
2.060 ±0.103
6.091 ±0.305
26.866 ±1.821
34.995 ±1.750
5.484 ± 0.302
3.261 ±0.301
1.018±0.051
43.875 ±2.864
2.460 ±0.147
3.381 ±0.247
22.367 ±1.333
3.271 ±0.164
1.856±0.161
4.805 ±0.257
4.191 ±0.271
1.212±0.074
2.328±0.116
6.116±0.363
0.289 ±0.017
21.916±1.254
13.951 ±0.698
0.586 ±0.029
2.193±0.110
11. 363 ±0.569
1.288 ±0.064
0.954 ±0.050
0.628 ±0.031
0.182 ±0.009
0.686 ±0.034
1.060 ±0.053
7.152±0.412
3.933 ±0.197
0.196 ±0.010
2. 146 ±0.124
0.284 ±0.026
8.328 ±0.416
6.377 ±0.319
9.745 ± 0.487
0.041 ±0.009
2.759 ±0.176
1.506 ±0.075
15.820±1.128
0.416 ±0.021
7.250 ±0.362
0.148 ±0.008
3.731 ±0.187
2.517 ±0.172
4.412 ±0.221
6.519 ±0.326
92.506 ±4.625
2.687 ±0.145
4.749 ±0.237
1.970±0.152
5.223 ±0.261
2.503 ±1.860
1.554 ±0.078
2.626 ±0.131
0.560 ±0.028
4.707 ±0.235
0.607 ±0.030
2.029 ±0.101
0.089 ±0.004
15.540 ±0.777
46.692 ±2.335
B2-11
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
2MeOctane
3MeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
n-Nonane
iPropBenzene
IPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
nPropBenzene
mEtToluene
pEtToluene
135TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
Octanal
beta-pinene
124TriMeBenzene
n-Decane
iButBenzene
sButBenzene
Limonene
Indan
13diethylbenzene
Udiethylbenzene
12diethylbenzene
2-propylToluene
3-ipropyltoluene
4-ipropyltoluene
2-ipropyltoluene
Nonanal
n-Undecane
1245tetraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1234tetraMeBenzene
n-Dodecane
W3-1 W3-2 W3-3 W4-
846 ±0.092 0.554 ±
980 ±0.183 0.950 ±
796 ±0.090 0.963 ±
.974 ±1.249 6.558 ±
567 ±0.028 0.304 ±
845 ±0.142 0.950 ±
773 ±0.089 0.618 ±
385 ±0.026 0.125±
287 ±0.081 0.459 ±
227 ±0.042 0.080 ±
560±0.228 1.312±
.537 ±0.977 5.165±
789 ±0.389 2.089 ±
307 ±0.465 2.527 ±
449±0.322 1.813±
434 ±0.124 0.208 ±
156 ±0.008 0.069 ±
.918 ±1.296 7.002±
863 ±0.104 0.675 ±
533 ±0.027 0.184±
394 ±0.020 0.125±
959 ±0.298 1.685±
186 ±0.342 0.704 ±
060 ±0.206 0.604 ±
191 ±0.344 1.426±
637 ±0.032 0.199±
349 ±0.067 0.477 ±
720 ±0.036 0.219 ±
126 ±0.007 0.039 ±
277 ±0.050 0.109±
843±0.242 1.116±
888 ±0.178 0.254 ±
636 ±0.263 0.400 ±
048 ±0.102 0.516 ±
762 ±0.038 0.185±
679 ±0.034 0.183±
W4-2 W4-3
.028
.058
.048
.328
.015
.048
.031
.008
.029
.015
.066
.258
.104
.126
.091
.060
.003
.350
.038
.009
.006
.084
.076
.061
.079
.010
.024
.011
.002
.020
.056
.051
.064
.026
.009
.009
W
315
903
233
.002
010
798
725
392
349
265
042
.890
726
351
967
474
189
.028
978
568
417
842
530
699
164
612
180
700
042
221
853
799
421
794
721
593
1 W5-2 W5-3
0.116
0.179
0.062
0.900
0.050
0.140
0.086
0.026
0.085
0.049
0.202
0.745
0.286
0.368
0.248
0.135
0.009
1.001
0.110
0.028
0.021
0.242
0.272
0.170
0.287
0.031
0.059
0.035
0.002
0.040
0.193
0.160
0.228
0.090
0.036
0.030
W6
193
018
080
.700
585
113
276
422
292
211
691
.517
025
546
478
351
116
.996
422
468
388
008
733
846
815
790
132
643
054
256
892
307
358
642
569
715
W6-2 W6-3
110
186
054
.885
029
156
064
028
081
039
185
.776
301
377
274
100
006
.000
135
023
019
250
293
185
267
039
057
032
003
047
195
261
218
082
028
036
B2-12
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
Gravimetric mass (mg/mi)
Carbon fractions by TOR (mg/mi)
Organic Carbon Fraction 1
Organic Carbon Fraction 2
Organic Carbon Fraction 3
Pyrolyzed Organic Carbon
Elemental Carbon Fraction 1
Elemental Carbon Fraction 2
Elemental Carbon Fraction 3
Total Elemental Carbon
Elements bvXRF (mg/mi)
Sodium (qualitative only)
Magnesium (qualitative only)
Aluminum
Silicon
Phosphorous
Chlorine
Potassium
Calcium
Titanium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Iron
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Arsenic
Selenium
Bromine
Rubidium
Strontium
Yttrium
Zirconium
Molybdenum
Palladium
Silver
Cadmium
Indium
Tin
Antimony
Barium
Lanthanum
Gold
Mercury
Thallium
Lead
Uranium
Anions bvIC (ma/mi)
Nitrate Ion
Sulfate Ion
Polvcvclic aromatic hvdrocarbons (ua/mile)
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1-methylnaphthalene
1+2ethylnaphthalene
2,6+2,7-dimethylnaphthalene
1 ,3+1 ,6+1 Jdimethylnaphth
1 ,4+1 ,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
1 ,2-dimethylnaphthalene
3-Methylbiphenyl
4-Methylbiphenyl
Dibenzofuran
1-ethyl- 2-methylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphthalene
2-ethyl-1-methylnaphthalene
E-trimethylnaphthalene
F-trimethylnaphthalene
2,3,5+l-trimethylnaphthalene
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
J-trimethylnaphthalene
1,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
W6-4
73. 13 ±3.66
27. 138 ±2.784
17.357 ±2.672
2.799 ±0.614
0.103 ±0.044
2.344 ± 0.599
1.981 ±0.287
0.047 ±0.039
4.270 ±0.787
0.0607 ±0.0320
0.0050 ±0.0308
0.0160 ±0.0209
0.0772 ±0.01 11
0.1608 ±0.0084
0.0178 ±0.0019
0.0090 ±0.0029
0.3285 ±0.0166
0.0021 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0004
0.0141 ±0.0017
0.0020 ± 0.0044
0.4563 ± 0.0240
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0036 ±0.0012
0.0146 ±0.0013
0.1670 ±0.0089
0.0069 ±0.0038
0.0000 ±0.0010
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0012±0.0011
0.0008 ±0.0011
0.0029 ±0.0022
0.0002 ±0.0014
0.0020 ±0.0030
0.0090 ±0.0035
0.0003 ±0.0042
0.0000 ±0.0033
0.0000 ±0.0045
0.0000 ±0.0035
0.0009 ±0.0043
0.0042 ± 0.0044
0.0022 ±0.0101
0.0113±0.0242
0.0031 ±0.0047
0.0025 ±0.0018
0.0000 ±0.0033
0.0137 ±0.0032
0.0000 ± 0.0044
0.01 ±0.01
0.22 ±0.02
9798.31 ±994.83
4261. 56 ±459.80
734.77 ±100.39
756.20 ±90.74
1092.67 ±132.07
251. 20 ±29.37
271. 98 ±36.35
66.11 ±12.72
29.35 ±4.88
42.46 ±4.70
20.69 ±1.59
109.16±15.78
2.30 ±0.33
45. 18 ±4.06
44 .44 ±4. 88
56.57 ±6.27
8.95 ±1.33
16.82 ±1.95
8. 14 ±1.34
440.69±47.17
14.88 ±1.84
157.99 ±16.20
W7-1
5.08 ±0.31
0.693 ±0.099
0.691 ±0.084
0.795 ±0.157
0.009 ±0.019
1.073 ±0.229
1.734 ±0.255
0.036 ±0.020
2.824 ± 0.464
0.0007 ±0.0229
0.0000 ±0.0227
0.0167 ±0.0154
0.1340 ±0.0105
0.0106 ±0.0015
0.0054 ±0.0013
0.0032 ±0.0021
0.0488 ±0.0028
0.0007 ±0.0007
0.0000 ±0.0003
0.0035 ±0.0012
0.0003 ±0.0032
0.0575 ±0.0057
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0009 ±0.0009
0.0046 ±0.0008
0.0122 ±0.0022
0.0002 ±0.0028
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0016
0.0001 ±0.0010
0.0007 ±0.0022
0.0000 ±0.0025
0.0019 ±0.0031
0.0012 ±0.0024
0.0004 ±0.0033
0.0007 ±0.0026
0.0019 ±0.0032
0.0032 ±0.0032
0.0068 ±0.0075
0.0073 ±0.0179
0.0000 ±0.0035
0.0000 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0024
0.0009 ±0.0023
0.0009 ±0.0032
0.01 ±0.01
0.15 ±0.01
1700.61 ±172.46
805.89 ±86.85
214.52 ±29.44
158.38 ±18.99
249.53 ±30. 15
16.06 ±2.07
63.38 ±8.48
34. 12 ±9.21
17. 16 ±3.65
11. 64 ±1.28
4.82 ±0
25.36 ±3
0.41 ±0
10.17±0
10.44±1
12.36 ±1
2.95 ±0
1.50±0
1.15±0
1 04.76 ±1 4
0.67 ±0
48.23 ±4
W7-2
12.44 ±0.64
2.520 ±0.241
1.796±0.196
0.147 ±0.037
2.524 ±0.523
1.422±0.168
0.040 ±0.018
3.836 ±0.556
0.0225 ±0.0192
0.0065 ±0.0189
0.0112±0.0128
0.0998 ±0.0082
0.0481 ±0.0027
0.0121 ±0.0012
0.0008 ±0.0018
0.1025 ±0.0053
0.0010 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0076 ±0.0010
0.0012 ±0.0027
0.0994 ±0.0065
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0022 ±0.0007
0.0056 ±0.0007
0.0508 ±0.0031
0.0013 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0007 ±0.0007
0.0002 ±0.0007
0.0009 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0019 ±0.0018
0.0049 ±0.0021
0.0018 ±0.0026
0.0019 ±0.0020
0.0003 ±0.0028
0.0003 ±0.0022
0.0002 ±0.0026
0.0010 ±0.0027
0.0083 ±0.0063
0.0000 ±0.0149
0.0003 ±0.0029
0.0002 ±0.0011
0.0000 ±0.0020
0.0028 ±0.0019
0.0017 ±0.0027
0.02 ±0.01
0.43 ±0.02
2539.05 ±259.83
1258.91 ±136.82
354.67 ±48.77
303.70 ±36.65
493.89 ±60.03
33.36 ±3.99
1 .70 ±19.02
95 ±13.32
.90 ±5.52
.45 ±2. 17
.53 ±0.82
.28 ±9.91
18±0.17
.04 ± 2.37
.96 ±2.97
.59 ±3.97
.43 ±1.55
04 ± 0.94
37 ± 0.40
.06 ±8.51
.56 ±6.41
.15 ±6.92
W7-3
3.45 ±0.26
0.594±0.103
0.856±0.113
0.903 ±0.181
0.002 ±0.021
1.000 ±0.246
0.295 ±0.087
0.003 ±0.007
1.285 ±0.265
W7-4
4.65 ±0.29
0.910±0.113
0.498 ±0.066
0.081 ±0.030
0.611 ±0.149
0.944 ±0.141
0.028 ±0.017
1.488 ±0.263
W8-1
4.21 ±0.24
0.692 ±0.076 0
W8-2
B.46 ± 0.46
715±0.108
0.661 ±0.064 0.539 ±0.078
0.032 ±0.018 0.036 ±0.022
0.578 ±0.095 3. 180 ±0.758
0.947 ±0.107 1
0.009 ±0.007 0
306 ±0.232
094 ± 0.072
1.499±0.186 4.534±0.884
0.0436 ±0.0255
0.0121 ±0.0250
0.0105±0.0169
0.0580 ±0.0088
0.0191 ±0.0018
0.0015±0.0014
0.0203 ±0.0025
0.0684 ±0.0038
0.0013±0.0008
0.0001 ±0.0003
0.0017±0.0013
0.0006 ±0.0036
0.0527 ±0.0060
0.0001 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0032 ±0.0009
0.0149±0.0025
0.0012±0.0031
0.0003 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.0009 ±0.0009
0.0000 ±0.0009
0.0006±0.0018
0.0010 ±0.0011
0.0026 ±0.0024
0.0003 ±0.0028
0.0027 ±0.0035
0.0033 ±0.0027
0.0006 ±0.0036
0.001 2 ±0.0029
0.0025 ±0.0035
0.0000 ±0.0035
0.0112±0.0083
0.0018±0.0196
0.0031 ±0.0038
0.0013 ±0.0014
0.0007 ±0.0026
0.001 5 ±0.0025
0.0002 ±0.0036
0.02 ±0.01
0.13±0.01
2080.22±213.19
971.29±105.67
163.24 ±22.58
195.65±23.65
308.54 ±37.56
67.81 ±8.03
64.93 ±8.72
0.00 ±5.40
0.00 ±2.07
15.95 ±1.78
6.04 ± 0.48
32.66 ±4.75
0.61 ±0.12
13.99 ±1.28
13.65±1.51
16.44 ±1.84
4.15±0.63
1.81 ±0.23
0.91 ±0.18
99 .39 ±10.70
5. 22 ±1.02
47.98 ±4.97
0.0112±0.0235
0.0091 ±0.0232
0.0056±0.0157
0.1021 ±0.0095
0.0411 ±0.0025
0.0041 ±0.0013
0.001 7 ±0.0022
0.1425 ±0.0073
0.0005 ±0.0007
0.0002 ±0.0003
0.0040±0.0012
0.0005 ±0.0033
0.1222 ±0.0080
0.0004 ±0.0006
0.0015 ±0.0009
0.0042 ±0.0008
0.0461 ±0.0032
0.001 8 ±0.0029
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0007
0.001 2 ±0.0008
0.0000 ±0.0008
0.0000±0.0016
0.0005 ±0.0011
0.0018 ±0.0022
0.0038 ±0.0026
0.0020 ±0.0032
0.0026 ±0.0025
0.0021 ±0.0034
0.0002 ±0.0027
0.001 8 ±0.0032
0.0007 ±0.0033
0.0065 ±0.0077
0.0071 ±0.0183
0.0012 ±0.0035
0.0001 ±0.0013
0.0000 ±0.0025
0.0040 ±0.0024
0.0000 ±0.0033
0.01 ±0.01
0.18 ±0.01
3419.88±350.92
1567.22 ±170.73
275.25 ±37.98
299.26 ±36.20
451. 29 ±55.00
105.43 ±12.46
56.97 ±7.68
2.31 ±7.05
3.50 ±2.80
19.33 ±2. 16
8.72 ±0.68
46.33 ±6.75
0.68 ±0.13
17.83 ±1.63
19.13±2.12
21. 33 ±2.39
4.91 ±0.74
2. 08 ±0.26
1.19±0.23
66 .48 ±7.20
24.30 ±2.56
64.52 ±6.68
0.0056 ±0.0164 O.C
0.0031 ±0.0162 O.C
0.0042 ±0.0110 O.C
0.0278 ±0.0055 O.C
330 ±0.0233
013 ±0.0226
159 ±0.0154
565 ±0.0081
0.0210 ±0.0015 0.0344 ± 0.0023
0.0052 ± 0.0009 0.0050 ± 0.0013
0.0014 ±0.0015 O.C
0.0578 ±0.0031 O.C
0.0007 ±0.0005 O.C
0.0002 ±0.0002 O.C
0.0035 ±0.0008 O.C
041 ±0.0021
762 ±0.0041
007 ±0.0007
002 ±0.0003
075 ±0.0012
0.0003 ± 0.0023 0.0003 ± 0.0032
0.0480 ±0.0042 0.
0.0000 ±0.0004 O.C
0.0011 ±0.0006 O.C
075 ±0.0073
002 ±0.0006
026 ±0.0009
0.0038 ± 0.0006 0.0063 ± 0.0008
0.0265 ±0.0020 O.C
0.0009 ±0.0020 O.C
0.0006 ±0.0005 O.C
0.0000 ±0.0005 O.C
0.0003 ±0.0006 O.C
0.0004 ±0.0006 O.C
0.0001 ±0.0011 O.C
0.0005 ±0.0007 O.C
0.0021 ±0.0016 O.C
0.0008 ±0.0018 O.C
0.0019 ±0.0022 O.C
0.0000 ±0.0017 O.C
0.0000 ±0.0024 O.C
0.0011 ±0.0019 O.C
0.0018 ±0.0023 O.C
0.0012 ±0.0023 O.C
0.0115 ±0.0054 O.C
0.0026 ±0.0128 O.C
0.0008 ±0.0025 O.C
0.0007 ±0.0009 O.C
0.0005 ±0.0017 O.C
0.0017 ±0.0017 O.C
0.0010 ±0.0023 O.C
0.02 ±0.01
0.18 ±0.01
288 ±0.0026
018 ±0.0028
000 ±0.0008
000 ±0.0006
011 ±0.0008
002 ±0.0008
002 ±0.0016
000 ±0.0010
022 ±0.0022
004 ± 0.0025
027 ±0.0031
010 ±0.0024
000 ±0.0033
015 ±0.0026
001 ±0.0032
047 ± 0.0032
063 ±0.0075
074 ±0.0179
007 ±0.0035
004 ±0.0013
013 ±0.0024
021 ±0.0023
015 ±0.0032
0.03 ±0.01
0.31 ±0.02
616.23 ± 97.27 1524.BU ± ZM.'Zb
1644.33 ±168.34 3288.80 ± 335.22
836.86 ± 91 .00 1661 .23 ± 179.90
220.87 ± 30.46 370.80 ± 50.86
194.48 ±23.48 3£
325.20 ±39.57 5£
22.73 ±2.74 12
1.61 ±42.31
3.22 ±67.08
0.27 ±14. 13
84.25±11.32 232.75±31.16
8.32 ± 62
98 ± 66
08 ± 02
33 ± 49
.81 ± .21
58 ± 09
.32 ± .30
.68 ± .51
.50 ± .96
25 ± 64
63 ± 31
15± 21
.17± .68 2
75±10.15
.62 ±3.97
.41 ±1.71
.10 ±0.78
.53 ±7.62
95 ±0.15
.24 ±2.01
.45 ± 2.25
.07 ±2.79
10±1.06
24 ±0.39
26 ±0.24
.80 ±30. 13
55 ± 72 89.69 ±7.87
34.23± .54 110.31 ±11.32
W8-3
27.78 ±1.40
0.900 ±0.098
0.672 ±0.077
0.581 ±0.120
0.002 ±0.016
1.487 ±0.302
1.860±0.218
0.005 ±0.006
3.343 ± 0.470
5.857 ±0.396
0.0071 ±0.0191
0.0060 ±0.0189
0.0047 ±0.0128
0.0399 ±0.0065
0.0150 ±0.0014
0.0088 ±0.0011
0.0003 ±0.0018
0.0538 ±0.0029
0.0006 ±0.0006
0.0001 ±0.0002
0.0042 ±0.0010
0.0006 ±0.0027
0.0855 ±0.0059
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0011 ±0.0007
0.0039 ±0.0007
0.0257 ±0.0022
0.0001 ±0.0023
0.0000 ±0.0006
0.0000 ±0.0005
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0003 ±0.0007
0.0007 ±0.0013
0.0001 ±0.0009
0.0004 ±0.0018
0.0012 ±0.0021
0.0014 ±0.0026
0.0005 ±0.0020
0.0006 ±0.0028
0.0010 ±0.0022
0.0019 ±0.0026
0.0024 ±0.0027
0.0023 ±0.0062
0.0000 ±0.0148
0.0004 ±0.0029
0.0000 ±0.0011
0.0008 ±0.0020
0.0009 ±0.0019
0.0014 ±0.0027
0.02 ±0.01
0.19 ±0.01
781.55± 122.75
1903.50 ±195.50
914.91 ±99.76
215.75 ±29.82
188.89 ±22.86
309.84 ±37.78
70.30 ±8.32
73. 19 ±9.85
7.30 ±7. 12
5.42 ±2.83
9.92 ±1.11
5.97 ±0.47
30.90 4.51
0.45 0.09
12.76 1.17
12.06 1.34
14.79 1.66
3.25 0.49
2.04 0.25
1.22 0.22
97.98 10.54
22.86 2.42
46.86 4.84
B2-13
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description W6-4 W7-1 W7-2 W
Dibenzothiophene 4.13 ±
Phenanthrene 292.67 ±
Anthracene
A-methylfluorene
1-methylfluorene
B-methylfluorene
9-fluorenone
Xanthone
Acenaphthenequinone
Perinaphthenone
2-methylanthracene
3-methylphenanthrene
2-methylphenanthrene
9-methylphenanthrene
1-methylphenanthrene
Anthrone
Anthraquinone
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene
A-dimethylphenanthrene
B-dimethylphenanthrene
C-dimethylphenanthrene
D-dimethylphenanthrene
1 ,7-dimethylphenanthrene
E-dimethylphenanthrene
9-methylanthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene 1
9-Anthraaldehyde
Retene
Benzonaphthothiophene
1+3-methylfluoranthene
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py
B-MePy/MeFI
C-MePy/MeFI
D-MePy/MeFI
4-methylpyrene
1-methylpyrene
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benzo(ghi)fluoranthene
Cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Triphenylene
Chtysene
Benzanthrone
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
3-methylchrysene
Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione
546-methylchrysene
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)fluoranthene
BeP
BaP
Perylene
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
Dibenzo(a,j)anthracene
lndeno[123-cd]pyrene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Benzo(b)chrysene
Picene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Anthanthrene
Dibenzo(b,k)fluoranthene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Coronene
Dibenzo(a,h)pyte e
nitro-PAH (ua/mile)
1-nitronaphthalene
2-nitronaphthalene
2-nitrobiphenyl
3-nitrobiphenyl
4-nitrobiphenyl
2-nitrofluorene
1 ,3-dinitronaphthalene
1 ,5-dinitronaphthalene
5-nitroacenaphthene
9-nitroanthracene
4-nitrophenanthrene
9 t ophenanthrene
1 ,8-dinitronaphthalene
2-nitrofluoranthene
3-nitrofluoranthene
.30 ±
.88 ±
.85 ±
.81 ±
.20 ±
85 ±
.51 1.60 ±0.20 2.44 ±0.30 2.88
31.22 137.33 ± 14.46 253.37 ± 27.12 96.62
9.41 10.92 ±1.41 42.71 ± 5.78 17.17
5.64 1 1 .06 ± 1 .20 27.64 ± 3.03 13.56
4.24 8.69 ±1.00
2.03 2.49 ±0.47
5.81 10.84±1.13
.26 3.75 ±0.51
00±0.14 1.68 ±0.24
.94 ±
.22 ±
.11 ±
.13±
.59 ±
.16±
72
.70
73
.11
28
.63
57
.43
24
60
4.7
.50
61
02
00
31
.14
.56 ±
.81 ±
49 ±
99 ±
62 ±
16±
.61 ±
.57 ±
.19±
00 ±
.81 ±
00 ±
00 ±
83 ±
02 ±
00 ±
.29 ±
67 ±
57 ±
14 ±
60 ±
00 ±
00 ±
00 ±
.41 ±
29 ±
00 ±
43 ±
.06 ±
43 ±
00 ±
82 ±
09 ±
00 ±
3.62 5.59 ±1.03
1.84 4.94 ±0.49
3.63 12.03 ±0.89
5.29 14.64 ±1.36
2.26 6.29 ±0.61
4.75 19.62 ±3.27
0 0.27 ±0.11
9 10.56 ±1.40
2 1.54 ±0.18
3 2.69 ±0.30
4 1.16±0.15
5 4. 10 ±0.34
3 1.23±0.16
3 2.24 ±0.20
7 1.58±0.16
0 0.00 ±0.08
92 48.55 ±3.59
97 37.67 ±3.30
1 0.69 ±0.20
6 0.00 ±0.11
5 0.13±0.16
0 2.67 ±0.35
3 2.91 ±0.29
1.24 4.47 ±0.37
0.89 3.36 ±0.27
.07 1.88 ±0.24
.90 1.74 ±0.20
.65 2. 14 ±0.21
.74 2.39 ±0.33
2.23 11. 38 ±0.87
2.79 3.58 ±0.46
2.90 6.87 ±0.83
.13 0.00 ±0.08
1.72 7.31 ±0.50
.13 1.86 ±0.32
.13 0.00 ±0.08
.32 0.46 ±0.09
.25 0.82 ±0.19
.13 0.33 ±0.09
4.22 9.61 ±1.59
.37 1.25 ±0.22
.97 2.71 ±0.28
.87 4.07 ±0.42
.33 2.30 ±0.32
.13 0.00 ±0.08
.13 0.04 ±0.08
.13 0.21 ±0.09
4.15 0.54±0.14
.14 0.33 ±0.09
.13 0.23±0.10
.15 0.00 ±0.08
3.47 6.89 ±0.96
.26 1.33 ±0.21
.13 0.00 ±0.08
.20 0.46 ±0.12
.56 2.99 ±0.40
.13 0.00 ±0.08
.88 ±1.96 10.54
27±0.80 3.15
.90±3.66 18.16
.90 ±1.52 4.88
66 ±0.47 3.63
.74 ±1.58 9.99
.08±2.13 3.71
.91 ±2.83 10.40
.51 ±3.93 12.40
.04 ±1.61 5.23
.38 ±6.80 10.86
69 ±0.37 0.21
.05 ±1.75 7.86
25 ±0.76 1.80
81 ±0.74 2.26
98 ±0.56 3.66
.65 ±1.22 4.30
63 ±0.40 1.32
89 ±0.73 2.54
04 ±0.55 1.94
51 ±0.26 0.22
.30 ±5.67 24.15
.32 ±6.72 21.93
08 ±0.06 0.00
00 ±0.08 0.00
00±0.12 0.13
47 ±0.43 2.54
71 ±0.45 3.03
83 ±0.39 3.38
52 ±0.28 2.22
11 ±0.36 1.60
66 ±0.28 1.33
93 ±0.27 2.73
56 ±0.32 0.98
.95 ±1.22 9.39
49 ±0.85 2.37
41 ±1.02 3.79
00 ±0.06 0.21
74 ±0.60 4.53
18±0.84 1.61
00 ±0.06 0.00
93 ±0.10 0.24
02 ±0.41 0.73
54±0.11 0.20
.95 ±2.87 4.02
20 ±0.39 0.38
77 ±0.82 1.78
08±0.83 2.13
82 ±0.38 0.33
00 ±0.06 0.00
00 ±0.06 0.00
44±0.10 0.12
09 ±0.35 0.57
27 ±0.07 0.20
38±0.10 0.00
23 ±0.07 0.04
.32 ±2.85 5.31
93 ±0.29 0.71
44 ±0.08 0.00
64 ±0.31 0.00
96 ±1.32 2.64
00 ±0.06 0.00
W7-4 W8- W8-2 W8-3
36 0.72 ± 0.13 0.84 ±11 1 .09 ± 0.16 1 .45 ± 0.19
0.39 124.1 8 ±13.36 86.86 ± .37 221. 26 ±23.54 136.64 ±14.67
.32 14.77 ± 2.00 8.75 ± 18 39.81 ± 5.34 24.75 ± 3.34
.50
.11 ±2.41 12.28 ± .36 18.29 ±1.97 10.75 ±1.19
.18±2.00 8.59±
95±0.75 2.69±
.33 ±2.60 2.31 ±
03 ±0.44 1.84 ±
00 ±0.09 0.00 ±
04±1.12 5.61 ±
54 ±0.27 4.48 ±
.08 ±1.29 10.39
.34 ±1.94 11.47
97±0.50 4.95
36 ±1.57 11.11
00±0.09 0.04
43 ±0.82 5.90
53±0.28 1.95
31 ±0.48 2.26
15±0.15 1.77
45±0.30 3.60
30±0.17 0.98
04±0.19 2.15
66±0.18 1.37
00 ±0.09 0.00
.54 ±2.77 25.20
.19±4.22 23.96
00 ±0.09 0.04
00 ±0.12 0.00
00±0.17 0.02
27±0.30 1.52
72±0.28 1.97
07±0.27 3.06
37±0.21 1.98
23±0.28 1.22
13 ±0.25 1.29
92±0.20 0.07
87±0.26 1.66
02 ±0.20 7.30
27±0.35 4.15
62±0.68 4.88
00 ±0.09 0.00
05±0.41 5.51
79±0.31 1.79
00±0.09 0.12
26 ±0.09 0.44
68±0.16 0.79
17±0.09 0.22
57±0.82 5.99
16±0.09 0.56
78±0.20 2.22
40±0.30 2.55
50±0.12 1.02
00±0.09 0.00
00±0.09 0.00
06±0.09 0.14
94 ±0.40 0.76
05±0.09 0.00
40±0.12 0.21
08±0.09 0.23
32±0.88 6.21
64±0.13 0.55
00±0.09 0.00
26±0.10 0.48
05±0.41 2.43
00±0.09 0.00
13.00±1.51 8.96 ±1.05
4. 18 ±0.79 2.20 ±0.42
12.97 ±1.50 31.14±3.58
1.48 ±0.23 6.04 ±0.82
0.70 ±0.14 2.38 ±0.32
6.01 ±0.79 12.52 ±1.85
3.27 ±0.34 4.55 ±0.47
9 12.42±0.93 14.32 ±1.08
1 13.93 ±1.32 16.54 ±1.58
6.56 ±0.65 6.65 ±0.66
7 9.41 ±1.56 10.56±1.77
0.00 ±0.08 0.02 ±0.06
3.78 ±0.53 14.24 ±1.77
1.48 ±0.18 2.40 ±0.26
2.72 ±0.30 4.87 ±0.51
0.76±0.12 2.25±0.26
2.29±0.21 5.66±0.47
0.67±0.11 1.87 ±0.21
1.19±0.13 3.32±0.28
0.93±0.12 2.66±0.25
0.00 ±0.08 0.00 ±0.06
1 29.55 ±2. 19 67.47 ±5. 10
5 26.04 ±2.29 74.60 ±6.61
0.00 ±0.08 5.54 ±1.46
0.01 ±0.12 0.00±0.09
0.11 ±0.17 0.11 ±0.12
0.97±0.15 2.85±0.36
1.22 ±0.14 3.39±0.33
2.29±0.20 3.77±0.31
1.48 ±0.14 2.56±0.21
0.92±0.14 2.27±0.27
1.03 ±0.14 1.79 ±0.20
1.02 ±0.13 1.62±0.16
1.80 ±0.24 1.63 ±0.21
10.83±0.83 12.72±0.95
4.01 ±0.53 5.28±0.67
5.54±0.66 6.31 ±0.72
0.00 ±0.08 0.00 ±0.06
6.36±0.41 6.31 ±0.41
2.05±0.35 2.09±0.35
0.06 ±0.09 0.00 ±0.06
0.47 ±0.09 0.34 ±0.07
0.77±0.18 0.91 ±0.19
0.21 ±0.09 0.23±0.07
10.63±2.00 8.26 ±1.80
1.38 ±0.26 1.02±0.19
3.81 ±0.40 3.59±0.38
5.67 ±0.53 4.83 ±0.46
0.84±0.18 0.91 ±0.18
0.00±0.08 0.00±0.06
0.00±0.08 0.00±0.06
0.20±0.09 0.20±0.07
0.00±0.08 4.12 ±0.81
0.00±0.08 0.00±0.06
0.42±0.12 0.35±0.10
0.38 ±0.11 0.35±0.09
10.17±1.33 9.79 ±1.32
1.26 ±0.20 2.22±0.33
0.73±0.13 0.51 ±0.09
0.82±0.17 0.72±0.15
4.22±0.56 4.20±0.56
0.00±0.08 0.00±0.06
68 ± 0.0122 0.0465 ± 0.0069 0.0785 ± 0.0097 0.0000 ± 0.0034 0.0002 ± 0.0034 0.0092 ± 0.0039 0.0256 ± 0.0053 0.0171 ± 0.0048
29 ±
17±
084 ±
199 ±
027 ±
063 ±
007 ±
000 ±
156 ±
015±
038 ±
000 ±
319±
002 ±
1-nitropyrene 0.0561 ±
7-nitrobenzo(a)anthracene 0.0231 ±
.0252 0.2575 ± 0.0340 0.2761 ± 0.0365 0.0292 ± 0.0065 0.0453 ± 0.0085 0.0451 ± 0.0082 0.1831 ± 0.0247 0.8450 ± 0.1069
.0023 0.0077 ± 0.0016 0.0207 ± 0.0038 0.0036 ± 0.0010 0.0004 ± 0.0005 0.0008 ± 0.0005 0.0008 ± 0.0005 0.0040 ± 0.0010
.0016 0.0024 ± 0.0006 0.0058 ± 0.001 1 0.0015 ± 0.0004 0.001 0 ± 0.0004 0.0028 ± 0.0006 0.0053 ± 0.001 1 0.0038 ± 0.0008
.0061 0.0000 ±0.0024 0.0000 ± 0.0013 0.0000 ±0.0025 0.0010 ±0.0031 0.0000 ±0.0012 0.0000 ±0.0022 0.0000 ± 0.0015
.0004 0.0138 ± 0.001 1 0.0072 ± 0.0006 0.0023 ± 0.0003 0.0005 ± 0.0002 0.0031 ± 0.0003 0.0031 ± 0.0003 0.0040 ± 0.0004
.0015 0.0038 ± 0.0009 0.0026 ± 0.0006 0.0000 ± 0.0004 0.0000 ± 0.0005 0.0000 ± 0.0004 0.0068 ± 0.0010 0.0000 ± 0.0004
.0002 0.0005 ± 0.0001 0.0024 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.001 3 ± 0.0002 0.0009 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001
.001 1 0.0002 ± 0.0010 0.0038 ± 0.0012 0.0000 ± 0.0007 0.0000 ± 0.0007 0.0001 ± 0.0006 0.0055 ± 0.0010 0.0000 ± 0.0009
.0027 0.0277 ± 0.0043 0.0870 ± 0.0132 0.0099 ±0.0017 0.0130 ±0.0020 0.0443 ±0.0070 0.0087 ± 0.0014 0.0180 ± 0.0028
.0002 0.0291 ± 0.0025 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0007 ± 0.0001 0.0006 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0091 ± 0.0007 0.0006 ± 0.0001
.0006 0.0031 ± 0.0004 0.0041 ± 0.0006 0.0012 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0019 ± 0.0003 0.0023 ± 0.0003
.0003 0.0069 ± 0.0009 0.0059 ± 0.0008 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0060 ± 0.0007 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0002 ± 0.0002 0.0046 ± 0.0007
.0036 0.0609 ±0.0056 0.0259 ± 0.0030 0.0102 ±0.0010 0.0022 ±0.0005 0.0105 ±0.0012 0.0103 ± 0.0012 0.0119 ± 0.0013
.0002 0.0376 ± 0.0021 0.0051 ± 0.0003 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0000 ± 0.0001 0.0014 ± 0.0002 0.0001 ± 0.0001 0.0007 ± 0.0001
.0070 0.0276 ± 0.0030 0.1 192 ± 0.0132 0.0223 ± 0.0027 0.0221 ± 0.0027 0.0529 ± 0.0060 0.0250 ± 0.0031 0.0231 ± 0.0029
.0033 0.2920 ± 0.0375 0.0402 ± 0.0039 0.0016 ± 0.0004 0.001 1 ± 0.0004 0.0337 ± 0.0036 0.0044 ± 0.0007 0.0028 ± 0.0006
6 itrochrysene 0.0096 ± 0.0016 0.0036 ± 0.0006 0.0159 ± 0.0018 0.0004 ±0.0001 0.0016 ±0.0003 0.0076 ±0.0010 0.0016 ± 0.0003 0.0004 ± 0.0001
B2-14
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
6-nitrobenz[a]pyrene
18a(H),21ll(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane &
17a(H),21ll(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),21IJ(H)-30-Norhopane
17a(H),21IJ(H)-Hopane
17fc(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H>30-Homohopane
17IJ(H),21IJ(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31-Bishomohopan
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H>30,31-Bishomohopan
22S-17a(H),21IJ(H)-30,31,32-Trisomohop
22R-17a(H),21IJ(H>30,31,32-Trishomoho
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14IJ(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-cholestane
ster45-t40(cholestane)
C28-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan
C29-20R5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-stigmastan
C29-20S5a(H),14IJ(H),17IJ(H)-stigmastan
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastan
Alkanes (uq/milej
Dodecane
Tridecane
Noifarnesane
Heptylcyclohexane
Farnesane
Tetradecane
Octylcyclohexane
Pentadecane
Nonylcyclohexane
Norpristane
Heptadecane
Decylcyclohexane
Heptadecane_Pristane
Undecylcyclohexane
Phytane
Dodecylcyclohexane
Nonadecane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Eicosane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Heneicosane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Docosane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Tricosane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Tetracosane
Pentacosane
Nonadecylcyclohexane
Hexacosane
Eicosylcyclohexane
Heptacosane
Heneicosylcyclohexane
Octacosane
Nonacosane
Triacontane
Hentriacontane
Dotriacontane
Tritriacontane
Tetratriacontane
Pentatriacontane
Hexatriacontane
Heptatriacontane
Octatriacontane
Nonatriacontane
Polar compounds fug/mile)
heptanoic acid (c7)
me-malonic (d-c3)
guaiacol
benzole acid
octanoic acid (c8)
phenylacetic acid
maleic acid
succinic acid (d-c4)
W6-4
0.0000 ±0.0001
14.75 ±1.57
13.99 ±2.87
61.83±12.58
39.59 ±7.68
3.63 ±0.98
25.66 ±3.24
20.73 ±4.59
4.11 ±0.78
13.90 ±3.90
8.81 ±1.13
7.26 ±1.60
2.29 ± 0.44
0.00 ±0.13
10.95 ±2.85
11. 85 ±2.36
11. 47 ±1.75
6. 04 ±1.42
7.49 ±2.03
5.26 ±1.26
5.67 ±0.80
8.21 ±1.54
13.83 ±1.82
10.02 ±2.05
8.19±1.73
334.31 80.40
500.95 60.84
2.88 0.74
55.64 10.42
156.09 13.99
4.88 1.48
67.46 8.51
3.34 0.94
23.47 2.04
46.59 3.81
5.07 0.94
22.57 2.37
3.02 0.89
23.89 ±3.91
1.97 ±0.69
35.70 ±3.08
2.26 ±0.46
61.11 ±7.99
6.57 ±1.31
56.74 ±5. 17
16.57 ±3.93
87.39 ±12.86
1.99 ±0.46
26.49 ±2.98
1.70 ±0.66
3.20 ±0.74
1.95 ±4.59
15.29 ±3.63
2.07 ±0.71
0.00 ±1.03
3.64 ±0.99
0.00 ±0.43
1.86 ±0.45
0.00 ±1.37
1.52 ±0.79
0.00±1.15
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.54
3.15±1.20
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.32
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±2. 12
0.00 ±0.29
-99.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±120.50
0.00 ±3.30
13.82 ±2.91
0.00 ±0.35
0.00 ±0.77
W7-1
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.21 ±0.08
0.03 ±0.09
0.31 ±0.12
0.33 ±0.11
0.06 ±0.08
0.13 ±0.09
0.10 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
0.05 ±0.08
0.05 ±0.08
0.01 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.06 ±0.08
0.06 ±0.08
0.07 ±0.08
0.03 ±0.08
0.19 ±2.62
0.45 ±0.28
22.00 ±4.26
77.17±7.12
1.63 ±0.63
41.32±5.17
0.27 ±0.29
12.10±1.06
16.63 ±1.42
0.60 ±0.18
8.00 ±0.88
2.24 ±0.59
8. 20 ±1.44
0.99 ±0.19
8.76 ±0.80
0.71 ±0.19
46.05 ±4.71
0.84 ±0.21
3.08 ±0.37
0.23 ±0.26
15.49 ±3.55
0.07 ±0.09
2.67 ±0.55
1.35 ±0.40
0.20 ±0.09
0.34 ±2.82
0.60 ±0.87
0.80 ±0.32
4.63 ±1.04
0.02 ±0.08
0.57 ±0.42
0.06 ±0.08
4.46 ±1.33
0.47 ±0.28
1.26 ±0.84
0.00 ±0.13
0.73 ±0.36
0.00 ±0.09
0.43 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.22
0.11 ±0.14
0.04 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±2.51
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±145.41
4.62 ±3.21
24.78 ±3.98
0.00 ±0.57
0.00 ±0.89
W7-2
0.0171 ±0.0015
0.60 ±0.08
0.85 ±0.22
1.88 ±0.40
0.92 ±0.20
0.11 ±0.07
0.71 ±0.11
0.65 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.06
0.32 ±0.11
0.13 ±0.06
0.24 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.22 ±0.10
0.29 ±0.09
0.28 ±0.08
0.11 ±0.07
0.04 ±0.07
0.08 ±0.07
0.36 ±0.08
0.17 ±0.07
0.32 ±0.07
0.25 ±0.08
0.11 ±0.07
45.86 ±14.03
52.78 ±9.94
0.00 ±0.16
33.35 ±6.30
90.74 ±8.33
0.00 ±0.14
40.37 ±5.07
0.00 ±0.18
14.90 ±1.30
12.99±1.16
1.28 ±0.25
8.50 ±0.93
0.06 ±0.09
9.76 ±1.63
0.17 ±0.08
14.02 ±1.24
0.00 ±0.07
6.38 ±2.67
1.27 ±0.27
3.97 ±0.43
0.91 ±0.31
0.00 ±1.89
0.06 ±0.06
4.25 ±0.60
4. 46 ±1.04
0.31 ±0.09
0.00 ±2.08
0.00 ±0.82
1.06 ±0.35
0.53 ±0.77
1.35 ±0.21
0.12 ±0.32
0.51 ±0.13
2.41 ±1.04
0.20 ±0.18
2.51 ±0.89
0.06 ±0.16
0.50 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.07
0.52 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.07
0.15±0.19
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.06
9.79 ±3.85
2.06 ±0.59
-99.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±51. 42
5.77 ±3.00
64. 13 ±9.42
0.00 ±0.36
0.00±1.13
W7-3
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.34 ±0.09
0.18±0.10
0.63±0.17
0.83 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.08
0.44 ±0.10
0.43 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.08
0.09 ±0.09
0.11 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.08
0.04 ±0.08
0.18±0.10
0.32±0.10
0.34±0.10
0.08 ±0.08
0.10±0.10
0.14±0.09
0.00 ±0.08
0.06 ±0.08
0.22 ±0.09
0.16±0.09
0.10±0.09
0.00 ±2.90
0.00 ±1.82
9.01 ±2.15
1.33 ±0.42
16.00 ±3.20
36.56 ±3.89
0.00 ±0.18
15.71 ±2.20
0.25 ±0.29
4.96 ±0.48
8.36 ±0.82
0.40 ±0.16
5. 16 ±0.62
0.61 ±0.25
3.20 ±0.75
0.47 ±0.13
4.41 ±0.46
0.05±0.11
9.83 ±3.00
0.46 ±0.14
3.07 ±0.37
1.00 ±0.38
4.75 ±2.86
0.11 ±0.09
1.17 ±0.47
6. 87 ±1.54
0.11 ±0.09
0.58 ±2.66
0.00 ±0.80
0.70 ±0.31
1.89 ±0.92
0.02 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.31
0.08 ±0.09
2.40±1.16
0.00±0.18
0.85 ±0.78
0.00 ±0.09
0.60 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.09
0.28 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.08
0.03±0.17
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±1.34
0.65 ±0.26
-99.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±68.36
0.00 ±1.72
2.09 ±0.83
0.01 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.48
W7-4
0.0000 ±0.0001
0.06 ±0.09
0.00±0.10
0.23±0.11
0.21 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.09
0.22 ±0.09
0.03 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.08±0.10
0.09 ±0.09
0.08 ±0.09
0.02 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.04 ±0.09
0.09 ±0.09
0.06 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
103.41 ±27.33
133.79±17.41
0.06 ±0.77
0.78 ±0.34
13.05 ±2.69
31. 55 ±3.54
0.98 ±0.53
16.20 ±2.28
1.29 ±0.48
5.32 ±0.51
10.23 ±0.94
0.72 ±0.20
5.34 ± 0.64
0.60 ±0.26
4.30 ±0.92
0.54 ±0.14
5.75 ±0.58
0.52±0.16
46. 74 ±5.01
0.41 ±0.14
3.70 ±0.44
0.95 ±0.45
26. 06 ±4.48
0.28±0.10
4.37 ±0.73
0.56 ±0.26
0.24±0.11
9.99 ±3.65
0.00 ±1.01
0.00 0.17
6.30 1.20
0.02 0.09
0.87 0.46
0.03 0.09
4.33 1.39
0.71 0.29
2.21 1.00
0.10 0.25
1.67 0.46
0.00 0.10
0.86 0.36
0.00 0.09
0.54 0.31
0.00 0.09
0.33 0.21
0.00 0.09
0.00 ±1.31
0.00 ±0.22
-99.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±72.90
0.00 ±1.73
0.70 ±0.68
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±0.41
W8-1 W8-2
0.0020 ± 0.0002 0.0000 ± 0.0001
0.25 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.06
0.64 ±0.14
0.46 ±0.11
0.05 ±0.05
0.29 ±0.06
0.15 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.05
0.11 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.05
0.09 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.10 ±0.06
0.10 ±0.05
0.12 ±0.05
0.03 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.02 ±0.05
0.30 ±0.07
0.09 ±0.05
0.14 ±0.05
0.12 ±0.05
0.06 ±0.05
90.21 ±24.08 1
154 .25 ±19.78 1
18.21 ±3.79
0.11 ±0.19
13.87 ±2.79
50.44 ±4.98
0.00 ±0.13
24.66 ±3.21
0.00 ±0.16
3.72 ±0.36
7.33 ±0.72
0.71 ±0.15
5.01 ±0.59
0.00 ± 0.08
5.23 ±0.96
0.00 ±0.06
6.97 ±0.66
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±1.98
0.57 ±0.14
2.55 ±0.31
0.91 ±0.28
0.00 ±1.52
0.02 ±0.05
2. 04 ±0.40
2.01 ±0.56
0.22 ±0.06
0.00 ±1.64
0.26 ±0.62
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.53
0.25 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.30
0.05 ±0.05
0.40 ±0.74
0.56 ±0.19
0.32 ±0.51
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.05
0.37 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.05
4. 34 ±2. 45
0.10 ±0.18
-99.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±167.55
1.11 ±2.11
5.24 ± 1.01
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.74
26 ±0.08
14±0.10
71 ±0.18
51 ±0.13
00 ±0.08
28 ±0.09
15 ±0.09
00 ±0.08
08 ±0.09
00 ±0.08
00 ±0.08
00 ±0.08
00 ±0.08
02 ±0.09
10 ±0.09
11 ±0.09
07 ±0.08
11 ±0.09
01 ±0.08
75 ±0.14
06 ±0.08
14 ±0.09
10 ±0.09
01 ±0.08
.52 ±35.64
.68 ±23.46
48 ±15.75
00 ±0.18
.67 ±6.00
.77 ±7.71
00 ±0.21
.12 ±3.75
00 ±0.25
06 ± 0.64
69 ±0.91
87 ±0.22
61 ±0.66
59 ±0.23
29 ±0.89
57 ±0.14
95 ±0.50
29 ±0.13
.69 ±4.35
15±0.10
75 ±0.27
00 ±0.22
.56 ±3.84
01 ±0.08
38 ±0.49
19 ±0.23
18 ±0.09
47 ±3. 16
00 ±0.85
80 ±0.48
90 ±1.07
06 ±0.08
20 ±0.37
05 ±0.08
43 ±1.33
38 ±0.27
80 ±0.91
00 ±0.12
01 ±0.38
00 ±0.09
93 ±0.36
00 ±0.10
49 ±0.29
13±0.17
40 ±0.21
00 ±0.08
00 ±2.21
23 ±0.33
9.00 ±0.08
00 ± 84.77
00 ±2. 17
02 ±0.55
13 ±1.40
00 ±2.35
W8-3
0.0004 ±0.0001
0.23 ±0.06
0.03 ±0.07
0.64 ±0.16
0.47 ±0.11
0.05 ±0.06
0.23 ±0.07
0.28 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.06
0.04 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.01 ±0.06
0.06 ±0.07
0.09 ±0.06
0.10 ±0.07
0.03 ±0.06
0.02 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.06 ±0.06
0.04 ±0.06
0.07 ±0.06
0.04 ±0.06
150.76±38.23
174.06±22.29
49.53 ±9.41
0.48 ±0.27
15.03 ±3.03
44.58 ±4.59
0.00 ±0.20
20.86 ±2.82
0.00 ±0.13
5.59 ±0.52
7.74 ±0.77
0.69 ±0.17
3.23 ±0.43
0.80 ±0.26
2.92 ±0.67
0.27 ±0.10
4.60 ±0.47
0.25 ±0.12
7.13±2.90
0.63 ±0.16
3.70 ±0.42
0.75 ±0.30
7.1 7 ±2.84
1.13 ±0.24
1.96 ±0.48
0.86 ±0.33
0.30 ±0.09
0.00 ±2.37
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±0.13
0.53 ±0.77
0.10 ±0.06
0.27 ±0.34
0.03 ±0.06
0.85 ±0.93
0.67 ±0.24
0.65 ±0.64
0.00 ±0.10
0.26 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.07
0.64 ±0.27
0.00 ±0.07
0.11 ±0.21
0.02 ±0.11
0.08 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.06
3.08 ±2.80
0.00 ±0.16
-99.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±143.21
0.49 ±2.38
6.08 ±1.23
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.48
B2-15
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
4-me-guaiacol
o-toluic
me-succinic acid (d-c4)
m-toluic
nonanoic acid (c9)
p-toluic
2,6-dimethylbenzoic acid
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid (d-c5)
2-methylglutaric (d-c5)
2,5-dimethylbenzoic acid
3-methylglutaric acid (d-c5)
2,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
2,3- and 3,5- dimethylbenzoic acid
decanoic acid (c10)
4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyl-syringol
3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid
hexanedioic (adipic) acid (d-c6)
salcylic acid
trans-2-decenoic acid
cis-pinonic acid
3-methyladipic acid (d-c6)
4-formyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid (c11)
isoeugenol
heptanedioic (pimelic) acid (d-c7)
2,3-dimethoxybenzoic acid
acetovanillone
2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid
dodecanoic (lauric) acid (c12)
2,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
phthalic acid
suberic acid (d-c8)
levoglucosan
3,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid
syringaldehyde
3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
2,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid
tridecanoicacid(c13)
isophthalic acid
vanillic acid
homovanillic acid
azelaic acid (d-c9)
myristoleic acid
myristic acid (c14)
sebacic acid (d-c10)
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid (c15)
undecanedioic acid (c11)
palmitoleic acid
palmitic acid (c16)
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid (d-c12)
traumatic acid
heptadecanoic acid (c17)
1,11-undecanedicarboxylic acid (d-c13)
oleic acid
elaidic acid
stearicacid(c18)
1,12-dodecanedicarboxylic acid (d-c14)
8,15-pimaradien-18-oic acd
pimaric acid
sandaracopimaric acid
nonadecanoic acid (c19)
isopimaric acid
palustric acid
dihydroisopimaric acid
8-abietic acid
dehydroabietic acid
8,14-abietenic acid
abietic acid
eicosanoic acid (c20)
levopimaric acid
heneicosanoic acid (c21)
7-oxodehydroabietic acid
docosanoic acid (c22)
tricosanoic acid (c23)
tetracosanoic acid (c24)
cholesterol
cholestanol
ergosterol
stigmasterol
sitosterol
W6-4
-99.00 ±0.13
16.65 ±5.34
0.00 ±0.38
6.58 ±2.80
0.00 ±4.00
0.00 ±2.04
0.61 ±0.81
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.15
1.86±1.18
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±53.72
0.00 ±0.87
0.00 ±0.34
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.97
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.89
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.37
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.39
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.59 ±0.87
0.00 ±0.72
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±9.28
0.00 ±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
7.51 ±1.79
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
10.48 ±1.90
0.00 ±0.29
0.00 ±2.64
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.59
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.20
0.00 ±0.38
#N/A
0.00 ±0.30
0.00±1.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.90
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±6.61
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.19
0.25 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.42
0.13 ±0.32
0.12±0.17
0.07 ±0.14
0.22 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.38
1.16±0.39
0.34 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.33
0.75 ±0.28
3.48 ±0.82
0.00 ±0.59
0.00 ±0.64
0.00 ±0.18
0.00 ±0.33
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W7-1
-99.00 ±0.08
32.83 ±7.96
0.00 ±0.09
21. 22 ±3.37
5.51 ±3.90
13.44 ±2.92
0.21 ±0.39
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.10
5.79 ±1.48
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±60.81
0.00 ±1.04
1.13±0.36
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
6.35 ±1.57
0.00 ±0.13
0.23 ±1.87
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.21 ±0.19
0.36 ±0.32
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.30
0.00 ±0.14
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.35 ±0.45
4.28 ±0.91
0.00 ±0.09
0.42 ±3.50
0.00 ±0.08
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.19±0.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
2.32 ±0.45
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±6.84
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.11
0.21 ±0.15
0.14 ±0.58
0.00 ±0.08
0.78 ±0.31
0.36 ±0.33
#N/A
0.00 ±0.18
1.72 ±1.23
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.09
2.82±1.10
0.00 ±0.11
2.39 ±5.81
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.10
0.76 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.20
1.33 ±0.39
0.10±0.10
0.01 ±0.08
0.03 ±0.08
0.25 ±0.12
0.07 ±0.22
0.00 ±0.11
0.26 ±0.11
0.05 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W7-2
-99.00 ±0.06
83.42 ±18.55
0.00 ±0.19
116.10±14.01
6.61 ±3.61
84.75 ±12.05
4.67±1.17
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.04 ± 0.24
20.96 ±3.86
0.00 ±0.34
642.03 ±177.89
13.95 ±2.80
0.62 ±0.27
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
23.46 ±4.27
0.00 ±0.08
25.90 ±4.99
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
1.02 ±0.29
0.22 ±0.25
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.50
-99.00 ±-99.00
3.07 ±0.80
6.88 ±1.06
0.00 ±0.06
1.21 ±3.50
0.00 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
3.02 ±0.70
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.07
5.78 ±1.02
0.16±0.18
2.81 ±6.22
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
0.49 ±0.17
1.39 ±0.60
0.00 ±0.07
1.69 ±0.40
0.40 ±0.27
#N/A
0.29 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.99
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.07
2. 19 ±1.04
0.00 ±0.09
0.63 ±4.28
0.00 ±0.07
0.04 ±0.08
2.31 ±0.53
0.23 ±0.31
1.74 ±0.44
0.12 ±0.08
0.30 ±0.08
0.15 ±0.07
0.05 ±0.08
0.12 ±0.21
0.11 ±0.12
0.07 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.10
0.02 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±0.25
0.08 ±0.10
0.00 ±0.20
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W7-3
-99.00 ±0.08
3. 79 ±1.80
0.00 ±0.09
8. 97 ±2.02
0.00 ±2.32
3.21 ±1.64
0.02 ±0.25
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.01 ±0.10
0.05 ±0.54
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±32.79
0.00 ±0.42
0.00 ±0.20
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.67 ±0.67
0.28±0.15
0.46 ±0.87
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.03 ±0.08
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±0.20
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00±0.16
0.00±0.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.06 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.52
0.03 ±0.08
0.81 ±2.63
0.00 ±0.09
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.78 ±0.26
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
1.96 ±0.39
0.00±0.14
0.00 ±1.73
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00±0.17
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.21
0.00 ±0.20
#N/A
0.00±0.18
0.00 ±0.87
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.03 ±0.09
0.05 ±0.08
0.00±0.17
0.08±0.11
1.30 ±0.97
0.00±0.13
2.47 ±4. 15
0.20±0.12
0.00±0.11
1.07 ±0.33
0.07 ±0.27
1.99 ±0.47
0.04±0.10
0.08 ±0.09
0.02 ±0.09
0.20±0.11
0.00 ±0.21
0.01 ±0.13
0.11 ±0.09
0.00±0.15
0.07 ±0.09
0.08±0.14
0.05 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.28
0.17±0.13
0.93 ±0.33
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W7-4
-99.00 ±0.09
2.27 ±1.54
0.00 ±0.09
8.1 2 ±1.97
0.00 ±2.07
1.96 ±1.54
0.04±0.13
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
1.1 6 ±0.79
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±34.69
0.00 ±0.74
0.00±0.19
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.95 ±0.89
0.00±0.12
0.07 ±0.49
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
0.00±0.12
0.00±0.19
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±14.89
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.87 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.46
0.00 ±0.09
0.42 ±1.80
0.00 ±0.09
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.67 ±0.45
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
3.34 ±0.62
0.00±0.14
0.00 ±1.69
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00±0.15
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.37
0.00±0.10
0.00±0.15
0.19±0.23
#N/A
0.00±0.17
0.00 ±0.81
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.14±0.22
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.94
0.00±0.15
1.89±3.81
0.00±0.10
0.00±0.10
0.00±0.16
0.00 ±0.24
0.10±0.15
0.09±0.11
0.04 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.09
0.04±0.10
0.00 ±0.24
0.00±0.11
0.03 ±0.09
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.09
0.00±0.12
0.00 ±0.26
0.00±0.19
0.00±0.10
0.49 ±0.28
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W8-1
-99.00 ±0.05
7.39 ±2. 13
0.00 ±0.23
11. 97 ±1.85
0.00 ±2.48
9.14±1.78
0.34 ±0.25
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.22
4.56 ±1.14
0.00 ±0.30
0.00±71.18
0.60 ±0.61
0.04 ±0.20
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
3.50 ±0.85
0.00±0.13
5.96 ±1.89
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.05 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.05
0.00±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00±0.11
0.00 ±0.07
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.20 ±0.29
2.40 ±0.71
0.00 ±0.05
0.26 ±2.90
0.00 ±0.05
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.86 ±0.23
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.05
2.08 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±2.97
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00±0.13
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.41
0.00 ±0.07
0.96 ±0.27
0.29 ±0.22
#N/A
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.86
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.50
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±3.06
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.21
0.31 ±0.22
0.08 ±0.07
0.01 ±0.05
0.04 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.11
0.24 ±0.12
0.02 ±0.05
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.19
0.00 ±0.13
0.01 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.12
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
W8-2
-99.00
0.96
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.13
0.00
-99.00
-99.00
-99.00
0.00
0.53
0.00
0.00 ±
0.00
0.00
-99.00
-99.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
-99.00
-99.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-99.00
0.00
0.00
-99.00
0.74
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.00
-99.00
1.02
-99.00
0.00
2.88
0.00
0.00
-99.00
-99.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
#N
0.07
0.00
-99.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.04
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
-99.00
-99.00
-99.00
-99.00
-99.00
0.08
.23
0.33
.05
2.65
0.87
0.18
99.00
99.00
99.00
0.11
0.67
0.18
0.56
0.28
0.21
99.00
99.00
0.37
0.28
0.63
99.00
99.00
0.09
0.12
0.21
99.00
0.16
0.32
99.00
0.51
0.50
0.08
5.33
0.08
99.00
0.31
99.00
0.09
0.54
0.16
9.44
99.00
99.00
0.20
0.14
0.36
0.09
0.13
0.22
A
0.19
0.86
99.00
0.09
0.09
0.20
0.11
.03
0.12
3.94
0.11
0.09
0.18
0.23
0.15
0.12
0.08
0.09
0.18
0.20
0.12
0.10
0.12
0.09
0.12
0.24
0.19
0.11
0.23
99.00
99.00
99.00
99.00
99.00
W8-3
-99.00 ±0.06
8.52 ±2.55
0.00 ±0.22
15.41 ±2.46
0.00 ±2.81
9.52 ±2.09
0.00 ±0.18
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.07
2.49 ±0.89
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±75.98
0.01 ±0.75
0.00 ±0.23
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
3.94 ±1.03
0.00 ±0.15
0.00±1.15
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.08
0.00 ±0.21
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.28
0.00 ±17.31
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.33 ±0.38
0.00 ±0.51
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±2.87
0.00 ±0.06
-99.00 ±-99.00
1.05 ±0.29
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.07
2.65 ±0.49
0.00 ±0.14
0.00 ±3.65
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.12
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.34
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.11
0.00 ±0.19
#N/A
0.00 ±0.15
0.00 ±0.78
-99.00 ±-99.00
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.16
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.66
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±3.55
0.00 ±0.08
0.02 ±0.08
0.11 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.26
0.00 ±0.13
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.06
0.12 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.17
0.00 ±0.10
0.06 ±0.06
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.07
0.00 ±0.09
0.00 ±0.23
0.04 ±0.25
0.00 ±0.08
0.19 ±0.28
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
-99.00 ±-99.00
B2-16
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description W6-4
Carbonvls (ma/mile)
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acetone
* acrolein
propionaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
Methacrolein
* n-butyraldehyde
benzaldehyde
glyoxal
valeraldehyde
tolualdehyde
hexanal
* acrolein converts to an unknown rear
1,3 butadiene (estimated)
C2 compounds
propene
propane
IButene+iButylene
n-Butane
c-2-Butene
3-Me-1-Butene
isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Me-1-Butene
t-2-Pentene
c-2-Pentene
2-Me-2-Butene
22DiMeButane
CycloPentene
CycloPentane
23DiMeButane
MTBE
2-MePentane
3-MePentane
1-Hexene
n-Hexane
t-2-Hexene
2-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Hexene
c-2-Hexene
MeCyPentane
2,4-DiMePentane
223TriMeButane
Benzene
CycloHexane
4MeHexene
23DiMePentane
3MeHexane
Cyclohexene
SEtPentane
1-Heptene
224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
4MeHeptane
3MeHeptane
Hexanal
225TMHexane
Octene-1
11DMeCyHexane
n-Octane
24DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
33DiMeHeptane
m/p-xylene
W7-1 W7-2 W7-3
29.04 ±1.72 58.54 ±3.29
30.31 ±3.28 74.74 ±7.21
426.41 ±27.41 .46 ±3.22
<0.730±<0.021 17 ±0.29
5.38±0.74 80±1.15
2.70 ±0.80 10 ±0.60
4.33 ±1.30 66 ±1.25
5.02 ±0.89 70 ±1.20
-0.73 ±-0.04 00 ±0.00
24 .42 ±2.60 .85 ±4.97
0.57 ±0.35 57 ±0.24
2.23 ±0.83 03 ±0.69
13.29±2.43 .05±4.12
8.92 ±1.38 99 ±0.68
2.453 ±1.356 4.898 ±2.707
44.392 ± 6.268 104.984 ± 14.824
14.152±1.716 28.253±3.426
1.707 ±0.085 1.333 ±0.067
8.925±0.605 17.356±1.177
29.527 ±1.476 36.581 ±1.829
1.193±0.110 3.508±0.324
0.521 ±0.026 0.811 ±0.041
33.010 ± 2.155 49.634 ± 3.240
0.844 ±0.051 1.206 ±0.072
1.803±0.132 2.465±0.180
1.804±0.090 2.283±0.114
0.987±0.086 1.323±0.115
3.372 ±0.181 3.871 ±0.207
4.766±0.309 1.925±0.125
0.616 ±0.038 0.779 ±0.048
2.012±0.101 1.284±0.064
5.355±0.318 5.217±0.310
0.113±0.007 0.231 ±0.014
17.222 ±0.985 13.467 ±0.770
11. 276 ±0.564 8.914 ±0.446
0.486 ±0.024 0.749 ±0.037
7.054 ±0.353 8.513 ±0.426
0.734 ±0.037 0.931 ±0.047
0.663 ±0.035 0.801 ±0.042
0.445 ±0.022 0.601 ±0.030
0.100 ±0.005 0.138 ±0.007
0.364 ±0.018 0.521 ±0.026
6.736 ±0.388 6.171 ±0.356
3.584 ±0.179 6.729 ±0.336
0.131 ±0.007 0.191 ±0.010
19.781 ±1.223
2.102±0.121
0.123±0.011
5.503 ±0.275
5.400 ±0.270
0.046 ±0.010
1.595±0.102
0.771 ±0.039
14.044 ±1.002
0.256 ±0.013
4.007 ±0.200
0.151 ±0.008
2.218±0.111
1.896±0.129
2.991 ±0.150
5.510 ±0.275
42.219±2.111
1.934±0.104
1.083 ±0.083
2.651 ±0.133
8.919±1.379
0.847 ± 0.042
2.728 ±0.136
0.124 ±0.006
1.964 ±0.098
0.556 ±0.028
1.151 ±0.058
0.049 ±0.002
26.786 ±1.339
.823 ±2.091
244 ±0.1 30
178 ±0.016
.814 ±0.541
651 ±0.383
038 ±0.008
097 ±0.134
047 ± 0.052
.575 ± 2.466
324 ±0.016
766 ±0.288
179 ±0.009
588 ±0.129
626 ± 0.247
867 ±0.293
.334 ± 0.567
.985 ±4.049
341 ± 0.234
448 ±0.1 11
778 ±0.189
992 ±0.682
878 ± 0.044
435 ±0.172
164 ±0.008
220 ±0.161
660 ±0.033
428 ±0.071
061 ±0.003
.446 ± 2.272
W7-4 W8-1 W8-2 W8-3
34 .30 ±1.94
23 .88 ±2.44
22 .55 ±1.83
0.41 ±0.10
4.05 ±0.50
1.94 ±0.41
3.95 ±0.89
3.88 ±0.55
0.00 ±0.00
17.41 ±1.81
0.76 ±0.20
2.68 ±0.51
9. 45 ±1.64
3.48 ±0.63
1.796 ±0.993
33.364 ±4.711
10.361 ±1.256
0.780 ±0.039
7. 174 ±0.486
20.850 ±1.042
0.948 ±0.088
0.391 ±0.020
22.703 ±1.482
0.611 ±0.037
1.175±0.086
1.038 ±0.052
0.575 ±0.050
1.950±0.104
1.486 ±0.096
0.333 ±0.020
0.874 ±0.044
3.226±0.191
0.131 ±0.008
8.845 ±0.506
5.899 ±0.295
0.428±0.021
5. 114 ±0.256
0.470 ±0.024
0.494 ±0.026
0.338±0.017
0.067 ±0.003
0.254±0.013
3.929 ±0.226
4.076 ±0.204
0.094 ±0.005
12.332±0.762
1.318±0.076
0.106±0.010
6.890 ±0.345
4.501 ±0.225
0.029 ±0.006
1.319±0.084
0.460 ±0.023
13.809±0.985
0.1 67 ±0.008
3.849±0.192
0.131 ±0.007
2.024±0.101
1.833±0.125
3.045±0.152
4 9 ±0.225
29 97 ±1.470
2 6±0.113
0 4 ±0.075
2 6±0.122
3 1± 0.627
0 0± 0.040
2 5±0.128
0 4 ±0.007
2 3±0.127
0 1± 0.029
1.1 96 ±0.060
0.045 ±0.002
22.269±1.113
B2-17
-------
Appendix B2. Chemical Composition of Dilution Blanks and Vehicle Exhaust Samples from Round2
Species Description
2MeOctane
SMeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
n-Nonane
iPropBenzene
IPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
mErSjene"9
pEtToluene
135TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
Octanal
beta-pinene
124TriMeBenzene
n-Decane
iButBenzene
Limonene
Indan
1 Sdiethylbenzene
14diethylbenzene
12diethylbenzene
2-propylToluene
3-ipropyltoluene
4-ipropyltoluene
2-ipropyltoluene
Nonanal
n-Undecane
1245tetraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1234tetraMeBenzene
n-Dodecane
W6-4 W7-
0.810 ±
1.508±
1.376±
1 0.428 ±
0.404 ±
1 .489 ±
1.318±
0.209 ±
0.712 ±
0.126±
1 7.864 ±
7.610 ±
8.527 ±
6.211 ±
0.304 ±
0.098 ±
25.224 ±
1.209±
0.388 ±
5.681 ±
2.167±
1.660±
4.996 ±
0.496 ±
1.207±
0.665 ±
0.110±
0.178±
4.113±
1.556±
2.044 ±
0.655 ±
0.637 ±
041
093
069
.521
020
074
066
014
045
023
.893
381
426
311
087
005
.261
068
019
284
233
166
278
025
060
033
006
032
250
102
033
032
W7-2 W7-3
311 ±0.066
896±0.117
731 ±0.087
.591 ±0.880
572 ±0.029
538 ±0.077
488 ± 0.074
206 ±0.014
760 ± 0.048
167 ±0.031
.671 ±0.684
627 ±0.281
499 ±0.325
983 ± 0.249
385±0.110
139 ±0.007
.092 ±1.005
130 ±0.063
387 ±0.019
898 ± 0.245
934 ± 0.208
579 ±0.158
958 ±0.220
499 ±0.025
369 ±0.068
591 ±0.030
047 ± 0.003
280 ±0.051
233 ±0.198
630 ±0.082
597 ±0.030
459 ±0.023
W7-4 W8-
0.807 ±
1.437±
1.386±
8.630 ±
0.509 ±
1.606±
0.898 ±
0.211 ±
0.838 ±
0.120±
7.241 ±
2.788 ±
3.686 ±
2.684 ±
0.352 ±
0.122±
10.431 ±
1.214±
0.328 ±
2.734 ±
1.067±
0.967 ±
2.584 ±
0.365 ±
0.846 ±
0.427 ±
0.031 ±
0.182±
2.021 ±
0.529 ±
0.766 ±
0.972 ±
0.345 ±
0.362 ±
W8-2 W8-3
040
088
069
431
025
080
045
014
053
022
362
139
184
134
101
006
.522
068
016
137
115
097
144
018
042
021
002
033
101
106
123
049
017
018
B2-18
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix C
Round 1 Recruitment
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Interviewer Training Guide
EPA KANSAS CITY PROJECT:
Characterizing Exhaust Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles in the
Kansas City Metropolitan Area
Study Goal: Use random sampling methodology to recruit and test vehicles so that
emissions data are representative of a metropolitan area so that emissions testing can be
conducted on the vehicles. Testing data will be used in revising a major Air Quality
Model.
Study Background: Mobile sources (cars, trucks) significantly contribute to ambient
concentrations of air pollution (NOx, Ozone, Particulate Matter (PM)). Studies suggest
that mobile sources can contribute to over half of the PM measured in urban areas.
Recent and past emissions testing studies have tried to estimate the contribution of PM to
air pollution, but these studies have obstacles such as recruitment of vehicles using non-
random sampling techniques, high non-participation rates, and high costs associated with
trying to entice persons to participate. Because of this, none of the studies conducted to
date can be used to accurately represent the distribution of vehicle emissions in a large
population.
5.2.1 - Recruitment pilot study/ Incentive pretest
Purpose - The purpose of this task is to identify the incentives that will be
necessary to ensure participation by regional households. The result will be the creation
of an effective motorist recruitment incentive package for vehicle testing and
instrumentation, as well as providing the best assurance for a high response rate. The
sole purpose of the pretest is to find what will be the minimum incentive ($, car
rental, taxi) that will get car owners to participate in the study?
Household Sample Design - The demographic and fleet characteristics of the households
that participated in the Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey will be reviewed and
categorized in order to draw a random sample of households for contact in the incentives test.
This will be supplemented by a random general population sample, as both are anticipated for
inclusion in the full study. The goal for the incentives test is to include a geo-demographic
representation of Kansas City residents, not necessarily a sample that is representative of the
regional vehicle fleet. The fleet characteristics will be considered for the full study testing. Here,
the pilot is concerned with identifying incentives necessary to offer to the vehicle owners for
participating in the study.
Develop Incentive Options - As identified in the proposal, specific incentives (or
combinations thereof) that will be investigated include cash (different levels), rental cars
(different quality), gas tank refill, car wash, and guaranteed rides. A matrix of options with
varying levels as well as combinations of options will be developed to ensure a thorough testing
during the survey.
Survey Instrument - The survey was designed to test respondent reaction to the incentive
options for both, vehicle testing as well as vehicle instrumentation. The survey will begin with a
brief explanation of the project and what is being requested of the respondent in terms of vehicle
testing and instrumentation. Then the respondent will be presented with varying levels and
-------
Interviewer Training Guide, Page 2
combinations of incentives to identify the optimal mix for ensuring high participation rates and
minimizing non-response. This survey will be conducted in English and Spanish, based on the
language preference of the respondent. We anticipate about 5% of the interviewers to be in
Spanish, based on language incidences in a current transportation study of the Kansas City region.
The questionnaire is designed for administration using computer-aided telephone interviewing
(CATI) technology. The power of the CATI software will allow for a thorough and random
testing of the incentive options. The survey will be designed for an interview that might last up to
20 minutes.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Selection
Q: How are households selected?
A: Since it is not cost effective to survey every single household within the Kansas City
area, a representative sample is being taken that focuses on the geographic location,
household size, and number of vehicles available to each household.
Q: I just participated in a Travel Study; is this the same thing?
A: {Answer goes here}.
Q: How do you select which vehicle to use or which one I should bring in?
A: Based on information gained from previous studies and available vehicle registration
data, a vehicle listing of specific makes, models, and vehicle condition is used to
determine which vehicles to test
Testing
Q: Who will conduct the emission test at Lenexa?
A: BKi (Bevilacqua Knight, Inc) specializes in conducting vehicle emission testing for
research studies.
Q: What type of emissions data will be collected?
A: (Answer goes here}.
Q: Will I be able to view the videotape of my vehicle?
A: The videotape will be used to document the vehicle's condition before and after
testing. Viewing the videotape will only be necessary if upon return, the vehicles
condition is in question.
Q: Will I be liable for any fines or penalties if my vehicle fails emission quality test?
-------
A: (Answer goes here}.
Q: Will I need to show proof of insurance ?
A: (Answer goes here}.
Q: How long will my vehicle be tested? (How many miles will be placed on my vehicle)
A: (Answer goes here}.
Scheduling
Q: What are the hours I can drop off and pick up my vehicle?
A: (Answer goes here}.
Q: Can my vehicle be picked up at home?
A: At the current time, at home vehicle pick up is not an option.
Demographic Specific
Q: Why do you need my household's income?
A: Since each participating household represents a cross section of households in the
study area, we need to make sure that we have the right mix of household income.
Previous research has shown that both the mode of travel and vehicle condition vary
greatly based on household income. To get an accurate selection of vehicles in the region,
we must collect information from households at all income levels.
Q: Why do you need other demographic data?
A: Since each participating household represents a cross section of households in the
study area, we need to make sure that we have the right mix of household demographics.
To get an accurate selection of vehicles in the region, we must collect information from
households of all demographics.
-------
Recruitment Questionnaire
Kansas City Emissions Testing Program
Round 1 Scheduling Questionnaire
Hi, my name is and I'm calling on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and the Mid-America Regional Council. May I speak with [**FNAME** **LNAME**
]? [If new person, reintroduce, if same person, continue]. The EPA and MARC have
collaborated on a program to measure air pollution from cars and trucks in the Kansas City
region. This breakthrough study is the first major study in the U.S., focusing on emissions from
cars and trucks under real world driving conditions. It is very important because vehicle
emissions include very small particles like what is found in smoke or soot. These particles can be
inhaled contributing to heart and respiratory disease. So this study will help to measure those
particles coming from vehicles in the Kansas City region.
For this study, vehicles will be tested for a 24 period at our testing facility in Wyandotte.
Given your preference of drop off dates, we ask you to drop off your vehicle before 1 pm on one
day, and pick it up after 5 pm the next day, but can work around your schedule. While the testing
is being conducted a rental car and a token of appreciation will be given to you. The company
performing the test is BKI, an industry leader in atmospheric, emission, and particle testing.
They are licensed and insured, and accept full responsibility for the vehicle while in its care.
Each vehicle is videotaped when it's dropped off, and again before it's picked up to verify its
condition before and after the testing. The specific information about your vehicles admissions
will be kept confidential.
To see if you qualify I would like to obtain some information about your vehicles.
1. I show that you live in * * COUNTY* * county. Is that correct? IF NOT, What county do you
live in?
CASS COUNTY, MO 29037
CLAY COUNTY, MO 29047
JACKSON COUNTY, MO 29095
PLATTE COUNTY, MO 29165
JOHNSON COUNTY, KS 20091
LEAVENWORTH COUNTY, KS 20103
WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KS 20209
OTHER, SPECIFY COUNTY AND STATE 77777 INELIGIBLE-
TERMINATE
DK/RF 99999 INELIGIBLE-
TERMINATE
2. And is your home zip code **ZIP**? IF NOT, OBTAIN
Our records indicate your household has **HHVEH** available for testing.
3. We are interested in testing the **YEAR**, **MAKE** **MODEL**, is this vehicle
available for testing?
-------
4. Does the vehicle run on another fuel besides gasoline?
5. How many exhaust outlets (Tailpipes) does the vehicle have?
6. Does the vehicle have 4WD? If yes, is the 4WD option able to be turned off?
If you are able to help us with this important study, we will provide you with a rental car and
* * INCENT* * for your time.
7. We have an opening on **ASSN**, would you be able to bring your vehicle in for
testing on this day? If not, what day/ date would work best for you? [One drop down
selection]
If it is convenient, we ask that you drop off your vehicle before 9 am, so it will be ready for you
to pick up the following day between 4 pm and 6 pm. Does this time frame work for you?
8. Does this time work for you? If not we can definitely work around your schedule, but it
may require the testing facility to keep your vehicle an extra day.
9. What time do you think you can drop off your vehicle? (Based on time, change drop off
date)
10. We are also interested in testing another Household vehicle, are you interested if offered
an additional
**INCENT**. [Loop back using 2nd vehicle]
11. And what is your name? (FIRST AND LAST) [Confirm name if MARC sample]
12. So that I can send you a packet of information about the study, I need to confirm/obtain
your home address.
ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
13. Your telephone number is ###-###-####, in case there is a change in testing, or the
testing facility has some information about vehicle, may I have a number where you can
be reached on the testing day?
14. Do you have an email address where I can send a reminder?
We are also planning on calling you 2 days before your scheduled testing date, to remind
you and confirm that you received our information packet. If you have any question please
feel free to contact us at l-888-###-####. Thank you so much for your help and participation in
this very important study!
-------
Vehicles Scheduled by Date
Scheduled by date
Assignment
695
696
697
698
699
701
702
703
704
705
706
708
709
710
711
712
713
715
716
717
718
719
720
722
723
724
725
726
727
729
730
731
732
733
734
736
737
738
739
740
741
743
744
745
751
752
753
Test Date
Tuesday, 7/13
Wednesday, 7/14
Thursday, 7/15
Friday, 7/16
Saturday, 7/17
Monday, 7/19
Tuesday, 7/20
Wednesday, 7/21
Thursday, 7/22
Friday, 7/23
Saturday, 7/24
Monday, 7/26
Tuesday, 7/27
Wednesday, 7/28
Thursday, 7/29
Friday, 7/30
Saturday, 7/31
Monday, 8/2
Tuesday, 8/3
Wednesday, 8/4
Thursday, 8/5
Friday, 8/6
Saturday, 8/7
Monday, 8/9
Tuesday, 8/10
Wednesday, 8/11
Thursday, 8/12
Friday, 8/13
Saturday, 8/14
Monday, 8/16
Tuesday, 8/17
Wednesday, 8/18
Thursday, 8/19
Friday, 8/20
Saturday, 8/21
Monday, 8/23
Tuesday, 8/24
Wednesday, 8/25
Thursday, 8/26
Friday, 8/27
Saturday, 8/28
Monday, 8/30
Tuesday, 8/31
Wednesday, 9/1
Tuesday, 9/7
Wednesday, 9/8
Thursday, 9/9
Total
4
2
3
3
3
6
6
6
5
4
4
4
6
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
6
6
5
4
4
4
5
6
2
3
6
6
6
6
7
4
7
7
5
6
1
7
7
Assignment
754
755
757
758
759
760
761
762
764
765
766
767
768
769
771
772
773
774
Test Date
Friday, 9/10
Saturday, 9/1 1
Monday, 9/13
Tuesday, 9/14
Wednesday, 9/15
Thursday, 9/16
Friday, 9/17
Saturday, 9/18
Monday, 9/20
Tuesday, 9/21
Wednesday, 9/22
Thursday, 9/23
Friday, 9/24
Saturday, 9/25
Monday, 9/27
Tuesday, 9/28
Wednesday, 9/29
Thursday, 9/30
Total
7
5
5
7
7
7
6
7
5
7
6
7
5
5
7
7
5
6
-------
Study Brochure
w
hat's in it for me?
In addition to the free rental car, every
study participant receives an
appreciation gift as well as the
knowledge that they contributed to a ground-
breaking study in how vehicle emission levels
are measured.
hat if I have
additional questions?
If you have any questions or would like
additional information, please contact:
Gene Tierney, EPA
Tiemey.Gene@epamaiLepa.gov
Todd Ashby, MARC
ta5rtby@niarc.org
OR
call the toll-free particpant hotline:
800-275-2209
visit the project website:
http://www2.erEweb.com/profect5/KansasCity/
Project Leaders:
MARC
Mid-Anwciwi RagtMl Cn
Help us to
better
measure
vehicle
emission levels
Project Leaders:
MARC
-------
•V Y/nat is tne Kansas City
'W E
rf
Emissions Study?
This landmark study led by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the Mid-America Regional Council (MARC),
will measure air pollution from cars and
trucks in the Kansas City region. Vehicle
emissions include tiny particles (like in
smoke and soot) that, when inhaled,
contribute to heart and respiratory disease.
ts the first rrajtr STL ay :i the Jnitea States
that will look at vehicle emissions under real
world driving conditions. In addition, this
effort will be a role mode! for other regions
across the nation.
hy is my participation
important?
Your involvement is so important
because EPA and MARC will be able to
measure emissions from many types of
vehicles in a real-life setting. The results
will provide the input needed to make air
quality modeling more accurate and serve as a
role model for other regions.
During this study, it's critical that we test
emissions from all types of vehicles: new and
old, compact and luxury, cars and SUVs,
vehicles that smoke and those that don't. The
test results are confidential and there are no
consequences to any vehicle owner regardless
of the emissions testing outcome.
H
ow does the testing work?
Participants bring their vehicles to a central
facility and drop them off for testing.
Owners may choose the most convenient
drop-off and pick-up times, between the
hours of 7am and 6pm, seven days a week.
Vehicles will be needed for 24-72 hours*
depending on the scheduled drop-off time.
Each participant is provided a free rental car for
use while their vehicie is being testea. And
everyone in the study receives an appreciation
gift as a way of saying 'thank you' for your time
and cooperation.
Some vehicles may qualify for a second stage
of testing that involves putting special
emissions detection equipment in your vehicle
for 24 hours. If your auto is eligible for this
stage, a technician at the testing facility will
discuss it with you. Participants in this test will
receive an additional appreciation gift.
Why is my vehicle needed for
24 hours?
Unlike emissions testing during a car
inspection, which onSy takes a few minutes,
this study requires vehicles to go through a
cold-start test following 12
without being used.
hours of sitting
Where do 1 take my vehicle?
The test facility is located west of downtown
Kansas City, in Wyandotte, with easy access
from Ijo, 1-435,
1-635, and
'~35 Testing Facility
6636 Berger Ave f
f
videotaping
each vehicle
before and after
the testing to verify it s
condition. Eastern Research Group, the study
lead, will take full responsibility for vehicles
while under The care of the test facility. The
facility itself is fully licensed and insured, and
has been designed with the care and security
hy are emissions a problem?
Personal automobiles are big polluters because of the sheer number of vehicles on our roads today.
We may not realize it because we can't always see it, but driving a car pollutes our air.
Besides particles, exhaust pollutants include hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide
(CO) and carbon dioxide (COz). Hydrocarbons and NOx, when mixed in the presence of sunlight, form
ground-level ozone, which irritates the eyes, damages the lungs, and aggravates respiratory problems.
NOx also contributes to forming acid rain. Carbon monoxide reduces "he flow of oxygen in the
bloodstream - a risk for persons with hear? disease. Fuel evaporation also contributes to hydrocarbon
pollution, such as during refueling.
-------
I
5
V
\
ui
O
MARC
Mid"America Regional Council
Kansas City Emissions Study
c/o 3006 Bee Caves Road, Suite A-300
Austin, Texas 78746
Toll-free Participant Hotline:
800-275-2209
ToddAshby.MARC
tashby@marc. org
Gene Tierney, EPA
Tierney. Gene@epamail. epa.gov
Recruitment Letter
,
Dear John,
Thank you for agreeing to participate in the Kansas City Emissions Study. The study is
being conducted by a team of experts led by Eastern Research Group (ERG), the Mid-
America Regional Council (MARC), and the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
Your vehicle testing date is: «Date»
Vehicle: «Year», «Make» «Model»
If you drop off your vehicle by 9am on your testing date, in most cases you may
pick up your vehicle anytime after 4pm the following day. If you drop-off after
9am or on a Saturday, your pick-up day and time will vary. A testing facility
representative will determine your pick-up time once they check in your vehicle.
If these times are not convenient, alternate drop off and pick up times are
available. Please call 800-275-2209 for more details.
For your convenience, we have included a detailed map with directions from your home to
the testing facility. The map is intended as a guide, it does not take into consideration any
construction along the route. If you have any trouble finding the facility, please call
913-299-9480.
Please be sure to bring the following to your appointment:
1) Completed Owner's Survey,
2) Driver's License, and
3) Proof of insurance card.
When you arrive at the facility, a representative will check in your vehicle and provide
you with a rental car and the appreciation gift of that was discussed in the
phone interview.
If you have any general questions concerning this important survey, please contact Todd
Ashby of MARC at 816-474-4240 or send an email to tashby@marc.org or Gene Tierney
of EPA at Tierney.gene@epamail.epa.gov. For scheduling or other information about
your appointment, please call 800-275-2209. Thank you for your participation.
Sincerely,
Dr. Charles A. Eddy
Chair of MARC's Board of Directors
and Council member, Kansas City, Missouri
g
-------
Kansas City Emmions Study
Participant Questionnaire
Tiaofc yew far pariqpiicrsE in tin; r«hicLa itossic-n tcaSy Plaiu tafc a fev HHZ^-I* DO raspami to
•Its foLoircig c'jjattiAC-;. Yocr BSSWHS will la If m camliib ••.vhidb iistan1 ID sanitiioc patesras.
Owner auns: --&T;:> ---hsi
Yehk l#: -- tEsli-•.
dale: --Dats-
1. LA-.T br iad •>[ ji :*liDi pur-rh? :+£ TTJ:
:IL S±«ll Qi » Di
i, FJJKHI D«
2. Vi'Li: ;ra-:+ -a: ;*-.:li=+ TTJ : irLi-."1
Di 3>ipcr
J. K«TT Its*; sj: wji ih* l«:r oil :bsn;»r
.c-:c-r -d wi; u-.id'
7. V''iibi= rLf I? :: #ir, bavf 0.1 E-T nAJr- bn= ^+rf-ar=+£ irii: i=-rlc.£i- yibwUaa
i HP D, Dm
o. BEH(I,T di-.cr-.tp HT drn i.vbiLr- or §a jini rnxamj; probl+it:
If yen lui^ in.T qnesdni: w if you need, ID rliia*e YOUJ cKiiȣ vppmumimt,
Kesst Sting rife /arm, ;«nf drher'i uttint at^yourpfo^fsfmvranct card
witkyss w lAf tesiagjscj&ty.
lismmf~Ttf f
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix D
Round 2 Recruitment
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Interviewer Training Guide
EPA KANSAS CITY PROJECT:
Characterizing Exhaust Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles in the
Kansas City Metropolitan Area
Round 2
Study Goal: Recruit and test vehicles for particulate matter (PM) emissions so that emissions data are
representative of a metropolitan area. Testing data will be used in revising a major Air Quality Model for
PM. Under this study, we will recruit respondents to drive their vehicles to a study facility, where
emissions testing will be conducted on their vehicles. The testing will be conducted on a dynamometer (a
treadmill-like device for vehicles) and under cold-start conditions; therefore, these tests require the
vehicles to be left at the facility over night. The respondents will need to drive their vehicle to the test site
before 9am of the test day, and pick up their vehicle after 5pm the next day. Vehicles can be left a day
early if they can not drop it off by 9am, but will have to be in at the site for longer than 1 day. A total of
255 separate vehicles will be tested.
Study Background: Mobile sources (cars, trucks) significantly contribute to ambient concentrations of
air pollution (NOx, Ozone, Particulate Matter (PM)). Studies suggest that mobile sources can contribute
to over half of the PM measured in urban areas. Recent and past emissions testing studies have tried to
estimate the contribution of PM to air pollution, but these studies have obstacles such as recruitment of
vehicles using non-random sampling techniques, high non-participation rates, and high costs associated
with trying to entice persons to participate. Because of this, none of the studies conducted to date can be
used to accurately represent the distribution of vehicle emissions in a large population.
Vehicle Recruitment: Along with the vehicle recruitment goals, there are 3 specific limitations
surrounding the testing availability of vehicles.
• Vehicles must run on unleaded gas only (no hybrids or diesels)
• Vehicles can not be 4WD (four wheel drive) or AWD (all wheel drive), but are accepted if there is a
switch to turn these features off
• Vehicles may only have one tailpipe.
Recruitment Goals: The goals for this survey are broken down between 2 dimensions. First, testing will
be made on 33 vehicles that previously participated in this study last fall (Stype 3). All other participants
have not participated in the study or received any forward information about the study. The second
dimension is the vehicle class. Each recruited vehicle is places in a specific class based on its type of
structure and year of production. Cars include, coupes, sedans, and wagons. Trucks include pickups,
mini-vans, and sport utility vehicles. (Heavy duty trucks and motor cycles are not accepted).
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
Pre-1981
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
13
47
40
60
20
47
47
33
307
1
5
3
7
3
5
5
4
33
14
52
43
67
23
52
52
37
340
-------
Interviewer Training Guide, Page 2
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Selection
Q: How are households selected?
A: Since it is not cost effective to survey every single household within the Kansas City area, a
representative sample is being taken that focuses on the geographic location, household size, and number
of vehicles available to each household.
Q: I just participated in a Travel Study; is this the same thing?
A: This study is being conducted to confirm that the program developed to obtain accurate vehicle
emissions will work and that we understand what is necessary to have the full participation of regional
households. That study looked at travel behavior characteristics of regional households, which is a
different topic.
Q: How do you select which vehicle to use or which one I should bring in ?
A: Based on information gained from previous studies and available vehicle registration data, a vehicle
listing of specific makes, models, and vehicle condition is used to determine which vehicles to test
Testing
Q: Who will conduct the emission test at Kansas City?
A: BKI (Bevilacqua Knight, Inc) specializes in conducting vehicle emission testing for research studies.
Q: What type of emissions data will be collected?
A: Levels of pollutants coming from the vehicle.
Q: Will I be able to view the videotape of my vehicle?
A: The videotape will be used to document the vehicle's condition before and after testing. Viewing the
videotape will only be necessary if upon return, the vehicles condition is in question.
Q: Will I be liable for any fines or penalties if my vehicle fails emission quality test?
A: No, this is a research study, independent of local or regional emissions registration and regulation.
Q: Will I need to show proof of insurance?
A: Proof of vehicle insurance will not have to be shown at the testing facility, but to use a rental
insurance will be needed.
-------
Interviewer Training Guide, Page 3
Q: How long will my vehicle be tested? (How many miles will be placed on my vehicle)
A: They need emissions data for both after the vehicle has been running and after the vehicle has been
resting for a while. They will be conducting short test through both periods.
Scheduling
Q: What are the hours I can drop off and pick up my vehicle?
A: Vehicle drop off will need to be before 10:00 am on the drop off date and pick up will be available
after 5:00 pm the following day. Besides the testing time, vehicle pick up and drop off is at the
respondents' convenience.
Q: Can my vehicle be picked up at home?
A: Yes, we can arrange for your vehicle to be picked up and a rental vehicle left for use.
Demographic Specific
Q: Why do you need my household's income?
A: Since each participating household represents a cross section of households in the study area, we need
to make sure that we have the right mix of household income. Previous research has shown that both the
mode of travel and vehicle condition vary greatly based on household income. To get an accurate
selection of vehicles in the region, we must collect information from households at all income levels.
Q: Why do you need other demographic data?
A: Since each participating household represents a cross section of households in the study area, we need
to make sure that we have the right mix of household demographics. To get an accurate selection of
vehicles in the region, we must collect information from households of all demographics.
-------
Recruitment Questionnaire
Kansas City Emissions Testing Program
Round 2 Scheduling Questionnaire
Hi, my name is and I'm calling on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
the Mid-America Regional Council. May I speak with [**FNAME** **LNAME** ]? [If new person,
reintroduce, if same person, continue]. The EPA and MARC have collaborated on a program to measure
air pollution from cars and trucks in the Kansas City region. This breakthrough study is the first of its
kind in the U.S., focusing on emissions from cars and trucks under real time driving conditions. It is very
important because vehicle emissions include very small particles like what is found in smoke or soot.
These particles can be inhaled, causing health problems like asthma and emphysema. So this study will
help to measure those particles coming from vehicles in the Kansas City region.
For this study, vehicles will be tested for a 24 hour period at our testing facility in Wyandotte. Given your
preference of drop off dates, we ask you to drop off your vehicle before 1 pm on one day, and pick it up
after 5 pm the next day, but can work around your schedule. While the testing is being conducted a rental
car and a token of appreciation will be given to you. The company performing the test is BKI, an industry
leader in atmospheric, emission, and particle testing. They are licensed and insured, and accept full
responsibility for the vehicle while in its care. Each vehicle is videotaped when it's dropped off, and
again before it's picked up to verify its condition before and after the testing. The specific information
about your vehicles admissions will be kept confidential.
1. If you are able to help us with this important study, you will be eligible for an incentive of $75 for
your time and participation. Are you interested in participating in this study?
If No - what if we offered you an incentive of $100? What about $125?
1=$75 [Go to 2]
2=$ 100 [Go to 2]
3=$ 125 [Go to 2]
4=Need more information about the study first. [Go to 13]
NEED MORE INFO - go to mail-out section but disposition should be Advance mail out required.
9=RF - Thank you for your time.
To see if you qualify I would like to obtain some information about your vehicles.
2. I show that you live in **COUNTY** county. Is that correct? IF NOT, What county do you live in?
CASS COUNTY, MO 29037
CLAY COUNTY, MO 29047
JACKSON COUNTY, MO 29095
PLATTE COUNTY, MO 29165
JOHNSON COUNTY, KS 20091
LEAVENWORTH COUNTY, KS 20103
WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KS 20209
OTHER, SPECIFY COUNTY AND STATE 77777 INELIGIBLE-TERMINATE
DK/RF 99999 INELIGIBLE-TERMINATE
3. And is your home zip code * *ZIP* * ? IF NOT, OBTAIN
Our records indicate your household has **HHVEH** available for testing.
-------
Recruitment Questionnaire, Page 2
4. We are interested in testing the **YEAR**, **MAKE** **MODEL**, is this vehicle available for
testing?
5. Does the vehicle run on another fuel besides unleaded gasoline? Yes - Vehicle DNQ (Does not
qualify)
6. How many exhaust outlets (Tailpipes) does the vehicle have? - More than 1 - - Vehicle DNQ
7. Does the vehicle have 4WD or all wheel drive? If yes, is the 4WD or AWD option able to be turned
off? If 4WD or AWD can not be turned off- - Vehicle DNQ
If you are able to help us with this important study, we will provide you with a rental car and
* * INCENT* * for your time.
8. We have an opening on **ASSN**, would you be able to bring your vehicle in for testing on this
day? If not, what day/ date would work best for you? [One drop down selection]
If it is convenient, we ask that you drop off your vehicle before 9 am, so it will be ready for you to
pick up the following day between 4 pm and 6 pm. Does this time frame work for you?
9. Does this time work for you? If not we can definitely work around your schedule, but it may require
the testing facility to keep your vehicle an extra day.
10. What time do you think you can drop off your vehicle? (Based on time, change drop off date)
11. We are also interested in testing another Household vehicle, are you interested if offered an additional
**INCENT**. [Loop back using 2nd vehicle]
12. What name should we schedule your vehicles under? (FIRST AND LAST) [Confirm name if MARC
sample]
13. So that I can send you a packet of information about the study, I need to confirm/obtain your home
address.
ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP
IF THIS IS AN ADVANCE MAILOUT PACKET INT = ADM
You should receive more information about the study in a few days, we will call you back at a later
date, Thank you for your time.
14. Your telephone number is ###-###-####, in case there is a change in testing, or the testing facility has
some information about vehicle testing, is there a better number where you can be reached at?
[OBTAINE ALTERNATIVE PHONE NUMBER] This is a second phone number
15. Do you have an email address where I can send a reminder?
We will also plan to call you 2 days before your scheduled testing date to remind and confirm that
you received your information packet. If you have any question please feel free to contact us at 1-
877-221-7828. Thank you so much for your help and participation in this very important study!
[Enter notes or any special scheduling comments if respondent is dropping off a day early]
-------
Vehicles Scheduled by date
Assignment
111
112
113
114
115
117
118
119
120
121
122
124
125
126
127
128
129
131
132
133
134
135
136
138
139
140
141
142
143
145
146
147
148
149
150
152
153
154
155
156
157
159
161
162
163
Test Date
Tuesday, January 1 1 , 2005
Wednesday, January 12, 2005
Thursday, January 13, 2005
Friday, January 14, 2005
Sunday, January 16, 2005
Monday, January 17,2005
Tuesday, January 18, 2005
Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Thursday, January 20, 2005
Friday, January 2 1,2005
Saturday, January 22, 2005
Monday, January 24, 2005
Tuesday, January 25, 2005
Wednesday, January 26, 2005
Thursday, January 27, 2005
Friday, January 28, 2005
Saturday, January 29, 2005
Monday, January 31 , 2005
Tuesday, February 01 , 2005
Wednesday, February 02, 2005
Thursday, February 03, 2005
Friday, February 04, 2005
Saturday, February 05, 2005
Monday, February 07, 2005
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Wednesday, February 09, 2005
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Friday, February 1 1 , 2005
Saturday, February 12, 2005
Monday, February 14, 2005
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
Thursday, February 17, 2005
Friday, February 18, 2005
Saturday, February 19, 2005
Monday, February 21, 2005
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
Thursday, February 24, 2005
Friday, February 25, 2005
Saturday, February 26, 2005
Monday, February 28, 2005
Tuesday, March 01, 2005
Wednesday, March 02, 2005
Thursday, March 03, 2005
Total
4
4
5
6
5
5
5
6
5
6
5
3
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
4
7
6
5
5
6
6
4
4
6
6
6
4
5
2
3
3
3
6
4
5
4
5
5
Assignment
164
165
167
168
169
170
171
172
174
175
176
177
178
179
181
182
183
184
185
186
188
189
190
191
192
193
195
196
197
198
199
Test Date
Friday, March 04, 2005
Saturday, March 05, 2005
Monday, March 07, 2005
Tuesday, March 08, 2005
Wednesday, March 09, 2005
Thursday, March 10,2005
Friday, March 1 1 , 2005
Saturday, March 12, 2005
Monday, March 14, 2005
Tuesday, March 15,2005
Wednesday, March 16, 2005
Thursday, March 17,2005
Friday, March 18, 2005
Saturday, March 19, 2005
Monday, March 2 1,2005
Tuesday, March 22, 2005
Wednesday, March 23, 2005
Thursday, March 24, 2005
Friday, March 25, 2005
Saturday, March 26, 2005
Monday, March 28, 2005
Tuesday, March 29, 2005
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Thursday, March 31 , 2005
Friday, April 01, 2005
Saturday, April 02, 2005
Monday, April 04, 2005
Tuesday, April 05, 2005
Wednesday, April 06, 2005
Thursday, April 07, 2005
Friday, April 08, 2005
Total
6
7
8
3
6
6
6
6
9
7
9
7
10
10
7
7
6
8
7
7
6
5
2
1
3
7
8
5
9
7
10
433
-------
Study Brochure
What's in it for me?
In addition to t-e free renta! car. every study
participant receives an appreciation git ss
wellast-e tiowledge that they cantrib-tea to
a grounc-oreakmg study in how veiicte
enissio" .evels are measured.
Kan
Emissi
Study
What if I have questions?
If you have any questions or ivou.d lite
additional information, pleas* contact:
Gene Tierney, EPA
Tu : d Ashby. MARC
tash isyE'in arcorg
OR
call the toll-free particpant hotline:
877-221-7828
visit the project website:
www2.er5WBb.com/projectE/KEnsa5Cty/
Project Leader:
fn Association With:
MARC
Help us to
better
measure
vehicle
emission levels
Project Leader:
nAssoda&cnwtn:
-------
' *
I What is the Kansas City
Emissions Study?
1
This landmark study led by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
with support from the Mic-America
Hegional Council (MARC), will measure air
•ioi.jt.07 f-3-n :a?£ =1; trjc-: = i The
Kansas City 'sgion. ve»nc:e emissions
include tiny particles (liSce in jmo«ie a^d soot)
that, when inhalee, contribute to heart anc
respiratory cisease. lt';rhe frsr na o'st-dy r
the Jrited States that tvi.l loo* at vehicle
emissions under real world driving conditions.
In addition, this effort will be a role moeel for
ofer regions across the rat.o-.
Why should I particip,
Yo,;r involvement is so important because
EPA wi'.L be able to measure emissions
from many types of vehicles in a real-life
setting. ~he resu.rs wi.l p-D'.'dE rhe nr.y
needed to make air quality modeling
more accurate and serve as a ro.e rrocel
for other regions.
During this study, it's critical fat we test
enissioTE T-om all types of vehicles: nev.1 and
old, compact and l-^xury, cars and SUVs,
vehicles that smoke and !t ose that don t. The
test resu:,!s are confidential aid there are no
consequences to any vehicle owner regardless
of the emissions testing outcome.
, Aw does the testing work?
Participants bring tteirvehides to a central
facility and drop then off for testing.
Owners nay choose the nost convenient
drop-off and pick-up times, between the
hours of/am and 6am, seven cays a week.
Most vehicles wiil be neeced for 24 -o^rs;
i» some cases, a litte longer, ceper.dhg on
the scheduled drop-off time. Each
paticisant :s provided a free rents! cai -"or _SE
while f.er vehicle is being tested. And
everyone in the study receives an appreciation
gift as a way of saying "!i>ank you' for you r time
and cooperation.
Some vehicles nay qualify for a second stage
of testing that involves putting special
enissiOTi detection equipment m your vehicle
for 14-72 hours. If your auto is eligible for this
stage, a technician at tre testing facility will
discuss it with you. Partic icants in this test will
receive an additional app-eciation gift.
Why is my vehicle needed for
24 hours?
Unlike emissions testing du-ing a car
inssection, wrich only taxes a few minutes,
this study requires vehicles to go th'ougJi a
co-.d-sta-t test following 12 hours of sitting
without beifrg iised.
Where do I take my vehicle?
Testing Facility
The test facility is located
westofeowntown
Kansas Dty, in
Wyandotte,
with easy
aCCESS
from 170,
1-435.
1-635,
and
1-35-
The
standard check-in
process includes viceotaoing eacf vehicle
befo'e and afte' the testing to ve'ify it s
condition. Eastern 9esearch Group, the study
leac, will take fd. -E50o"5!b)ii".' fo- vehic.es
w*iile under the care of t'e test facility. The
facility itself is ftilly licensed ard iis^red, ar.d
has been cesigied with the care and security
ofyourvehicla in J
Why are emissions a problem?
Personal autorrobi.es a-e Dig polluters because cf fhe shEer r^nbe- o've'iC'j; o~ c^ roa-i "iav.
We may not realize it because we can't always see it, but driving a car pollutes our air.
Besides particles, exhaust pollutants include hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides (NO*!, carso" nonoxide
(CO) and carbon cioxide (COi). Hyd'ocarbonsane NOx. when mixeti in the presence ufauotigbt fopn
ground-.evel orone, which imitates the eyes, damages the lungs, aid aggravates 'esniratory p"ob',ems.
NOx also contributes to forming acic rain. Cartwan monoxide reduces the flow of oxygen in the
bloodstream - a -isk for persons wi?' heart disease. Fuel evaporation also co-Urib^tes to hydrocarbon
pollution, such as during refueling.
-------
Recruitment Letter
«FNAME» «LNAME»
«Address»
«City», «State» «Zip»
Dear «FNAME»,
You have been selected to participate in the Kansas City Emissions Study. The study is the first of
its kind to be conducted in the US and will serve as a role model for other US cities to more
accurately document the levels of vehicle emissions in other regions. The study is being conducted
by a team of experts from Eastern Research Group (ERG), and sponsored by the Mid-America
Regional Council (MARC) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The Kansas City Emissions Study focuses on the emissions of specific vehicle years, makes, and
models. For this study your vehicle will represent all similar makes and models from owners in the
area. Your participation is very important so an accurate representation of the Kansas City Area can
be made. As a token of appreciation all study participants will receive a monetary incentive.
A study representative will be calling you back in a few days to see if you are available to help us
with this important study. Enclosed is a brochure that provides more info about the study. If you
have any general questions concerning this study, please call 877-221-7827 or visit us online at
www2.ergweb.com/projects/kansascity.
We hope that you can help in this very important study.
Sincerely,
$ tf-
i UM\frv~ f •
-.'.'-• A n
, . \ \ \j
Dr. Charles A. Eddy Gene Tierney
Chair of MARC's Board of Directors Director Center for Air Quality
and Council member, Kansas City, Missouri and Modeling, U.S. EPA
-------
Kansas Citv Emissions Study
i- i
Participant Questionnaire
"Funk ymj far pirdnpimii in, tfaii vjincb imjiiuzs. sndy Ptaia tat* a £vx mi— —a » nipood re
•it faLcymr.; cvjacboci. Tocr mraracs will :alf us cormlsLis -,^hi,cb iistan- 10 Kmitsicc. pdtEanat.
Owner nun*: ^fir."- -
akw^-. --a
: --Date:
1. Lact brand of jj:clini pur-^hj :+i TTJ :
IL Sfczll DJ Rf Dl Cili
Vi'Lj:
Zlj I -i::'ii. D> ••-.-•::
J. Bow IKBJ sgs was lii» li=t mil chsDgi
4. V''Lj: trend :f rr.c-:c-r *d wi: u-.id'
5. Wt» irai :bi Bal -sinr-aiiir? i.Exucfui: I I'fA'll'Pl
J. Wins *3 iddicn *: jr» fciimg ms&i*
.ijc-r npAir- httm. z+rl'-3r=i+:. Irii: iz-rlc.ii1:
rj:? I- :i::r
':« ;lrioi)|r JiKrfcf: Db H:» Di Dnn'lbw
. Eriifti* di-cr-.b» IZT dciriixbilirr sr inini ru==^z
If y«i hdiie an.-' c UCLQOD-. :-r if you «#d :o cL.in.--r vour
Lfis* call 1 JOO-IT5-2.2W.
nform, jsjif drh-fr'z ucatft aifdjmtrprvqfqfBKJtrsnft ear J
test
Hm l*oii«"
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix E
Dynamometer QA Checks
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Table E-1. CVS Propane Injection for July 2004.
Date
Start Mass (Gm)
Finish Mass (Gm)
Time(Min)
Temperature PDF, F
Barometric Pressure,
POP inlet Pressure, "H20
HC bkg, ppmC
HC sample, ppmC
PDF counts
Vmix
Propane Mass Recovered,
Propane Mass Injected, Gm
% Difference
Bae 1
07/25/04
792.8
777.8
5.00
114.8
749.00
11.00
5.00
374.00
8850.00
2385.04
15.23
15.00
1.50
Bag 2
07/25/04
777.8
752
18.92
114.8
749.00
11.00
4.00
169.00
33482.50
9023.42
25.76
25.80
-0.17
Bag 3
07/25/04
752
743.6
5.00
114.8
749.00
11.00
4.00
205.00
8850.00
2385.04
8.29
8.40
-1.27
Modal 1
07/25/04
792.8
777.8
5.00
114.8
750.50
11.00
2.70
358.88
8850.00
2389.95
14.73
15.00
-1.82
Modal 2
07/25/04
777.8
752
18.92
114.8
750.50
11.00
2.70
167.65
33482.50
9041.99
25.80
25.80
0.01
Modal 3
07/25/04
752
743.6
5.00
114.8
750.5
11
2.7
203.77
8850.00
2389.95
8.31
8.40
-1.03
Table E-2. CVS Propane Injection for August 2004.
Date
Start Mass (Gm)
Finish Mass (Gm)
Time(Min)
Temperature PDP, F
Barometric Pressure,
PDP inlet Pressure, "H20
HC bkg, ppmC
HC sample, ppmC
PDP counts
Vmix
Propane Mass Recovered,
Propane Mass Injected, Gm
% Difference
Bae 1
08/30/04
1005
992.3
5.00
114.8
747.00
11.00
2.00
291.00
8850.00
2378.50
11.89
12.70
-6.36
Bae 2
08/30/04
992.3
937
18.92
114.8
747.00
11.00
2.00
332.00
33488.4
8998.65
51.37
55.30
-7.10
Bae 3
08/30/04
937
922.8
5.00
114.8
747.00
11.00
2.00
329.00
8850.00
2378.50
13.46
14.20
-5.24
Modal 1
08/30/04
1005
992.3
5.00
114.8
747.00
11.00
2.05
306.20
8850.00
2378.50
12.52
12.70
-1.46
Modal 2
08/30/04
992.3
937
18.92
114.8
747.00
11.00
2.05
353.90
33488.4
8998.65
54.77
55.30
-0.95
Modal 3
08/30/04
937
922.8
5.00
114.8
747.00
11
2.05
329
8850.00
2378.50
13.45
14.20
-5.26
-------
Table E-3. CVS Propane Injection for September 2004.
Date
Start Mass (Gm)
Finish Mass (Gm)
Time(Min)
Temperature PDF, F
Barometric Pressure,
POP inlet Pressure, "H20
HC bkg, ppmC
HC sample, ppmC
PDF counts
Vmix
Propane Mass Recovered,
Propane Mass Injected, Gm
% Difference
Bag 1
09/30/04
1020.2
1006.6
5.00
113.5
744.10
11.00
3.00
325.00
8850.00
2374.38
13.23
13.60
-2.74
Bag 2
09/30/04
1006.6
947.5
18.92
113.5
744.10
11.00
3.00
375.00
33488.4
8983.05
57.81
59.10
-2.18
Bag 3
09/30/04
947.5
936.1
5.00
113.5
744.10
11.00
3.00
278.00
8850.00
2374.38
11.30
11.40
-0.91
Modal 1
09/30/04
1020.2
1006.6
5.00
113.5
744.10
11.00
2.33
323.40
8850.00
2374.38
13.19
13.60
-3.03
Modal 2
09/30/04
1006.6
947.5
18.92
113.5
744.10
11.00
2.33
373.60
33488.4
8983.05
57.70
59.10
-2.37
Modal 3
09/30/04
947.5
936.1
5.00
113.5
744.10
11
2.33
273.2
8850.00
2374.38
11.13
11.40
-2.40
Table E-4. CVS Propane Injection for January 2005.
Date
Start Mass (Gm)
Finish Mass (Gm)
Time(Min)
Temperature PDP, F
Barometric Pressure,
PDP inlet Pressure, "H20
HC bkg, ppmC
HC sample, ppmC
PDP counts
Vmix
Propane Mass Recovered,
Propane Mass Injected, Gm
% Difference
Bag 1
01/10/05
828.6
813.9
5.00
111.8
745.80
11.00
4.00
347.00
8850.00
2387.03
14.16
14.70
-3.64
Bag 2
01/10/05
813.9
794.7
18.92
111.8
745.80
11.00
3.00
124.00
33488.4
9032.52
18.91
19.20
-1.52
Bag 3
01/10/05
794.7
781.9
5.00
111.8
745.80
11.00
3.00
304.00
8850.00
2387.03
12.43
12.80
-2.89
Modal 1
01/10/05
828.6
813.9
5.00
111.8
745.80
11.00
2.36
341.00
8850.00
2387.03
13.98
14.70
-4.87
Modal 2
01/10/05
813.9
794.7
18.92
111.8
745.80
11.00
2.39
120.70
33488.4
9032.52
18.49
19.20
-3.71
Modal 3
01/10/05
794.7
781.9
5.00
111.8
745.80
11
2.55
296.2
8850.00
2387.03
12.13
12.80
-5.26
-------
Table E-5. CVS Propane Injection for February, 2005.
Date
Start Mass (Gm)
Finish Mass (Gm)
Time(Min)
Temperature PDF, F
Barometric Pressure,
POP inlet Pressure, "H20
HC bkg, ppmC
HC sample, ppmC
PDF counts
Vmix
Propane Mass Recovered,
Propane Mass Injected, Gm
% Difference
Bag 1
02/24/05
760.8
751.9
5.00
114.2
749.20
11.00
3.00
220.00
8860.00
2390.89
8.98
8.90
0.85
Bag 2
02/24/05
751.9
720.6
18.92
114.2
749.20
11.00
2.00
200.00
33526.24
9047.13
30.99
31.30
-0.99
Bag 3
02/24/05
720.6
712.6
5.00
114.2
749.20
11.00
3.00
189.00
8860.00
2390.89
7.69
8.00
-3.83
Modal 1
02/24/05
760.8
751.9
5.00
114.2
749.20
11.00
2.38
210.90
8860.00
2390.89
8.62
8.90
-3.09
Modal 2
02/24/05
751.9
720.6
18.92
114.2
749.20
11.00
2.38
199.20
33526.24
9047.13
30.81
31.30
-1.58
Modal 3
02/24/05
720.6
712.6
5.00
114.2
749.20
11
2.38
188.8
8860.00
2390.89
7.71
8.00
-3.62
Table E-6. CVS Propane Injection for March 2005.
Date
Start Mass (Gm)
Finish Mass (Gm)
Time(Min)
Temperature PDP, F
Barometric Pressure,
PDP inlet Pressure, "H20
HC bkg, ppmC
HC sample, ppmC
PDP counts
Vmix
Propane Mass Recovered,
Propane Mass Injected, Gm
% Difference
Bag 1
03/29/05
975.8
971.1
5.00
116.5
736.10
11.00
2.00
116.00
8860.00
2338.55
4.61
4.70
-1.87
Bag 2
03/29/05
971.1
948.7
18.92
116.5
736.10
11.00
2.00
148.00
33526.24
8849.08
22.35
22.40
-0.22
Bag 3
03/29/05
948.7
940.8
5.00
116.5
736.10
11.00
2.00
197.00
8860.00
2338.55
7.89
7.90
-0.14
Modal 1
03/29/05
975.8
971.1
5.00
116.5
736.10
11.00
1.02
113.60
8860.00
2338.55
4.55
4.70
-3.09
Modal 2
03/29/05
971.1
948.7
18.92
116.5
736.10
11.00
1.02
144.80
33526.24
8849.08
22.01
22.40
-1.74
Modal 3
03/29/05
948.7
940.8
5.00
116.5
736.10
11
1.25
194.4
8860.00
2338.55
7.81
7.90
-1.09
-------
Table E-7. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer FID.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
891
801.9
712.8
623.7
534.6
445.5
356.4
267.3
178.2
89.1
0
HC1
Conciupas DDm
891
800
711
621
532
444
355
266
177
89
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
892.9
801.8
712.7
622.6
533.4
445.3
356.2
267.1
178.0
89.8
1 flf)
/ 3
n nnnn
Aug 30, 2004
Difference, %
0.2
-0.0
-0.0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.8
Table E-8. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer Chemiluminescence.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
93 6
84.24
74.88
65.52
56.16
46.8
37.44
28.08
18.72
9.36
0
NOx
Conciupas DDm
93 6
84
74.7
65.4
55.8
46.8
37.2
27.9
18.6
9.3
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
93 8
84.2
74.9
65.6
55.9
46.9
37.3
28.0
18.7
9.4
1 flf)
10
n nnnn
Aug 30, 2004
Difference, %
07
-0.1
-0.0
0.0
-0.4
0.3
-0.3
-0.2
-0.0
0.5
-------
Table E-9. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
2.864
2.5776
2.2912
2.0048
1.7184
1.432
1.1456
0.8592
0.5728
0.2864
0
CO2
Conciupas DDm
2.864
2.578
2.295
2.011
1.723
1.441
1.152
0.868
0.581
0.292
0.005
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.6
0.3
1 flf)
01
n nnnn
Aug 30, 2004
Difference, %
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.1
-0.0
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.2
-0.7
Table E-10. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
888
799.2
710.4
621.6
532.8
444
355.2
266.4
177.6
88.8
0
Low CO
Conciupas DDm
888
793
709
619
532
444
354
265
179
91
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
890.9
795.5
711.1
620.7
533.3
444.9
354.5
265.1
178.7
90.3
1.00
1.09
fl QQQQ
Aug 30, 2004
Difference, %
0.3
-0.5
0.1
-0.1
0.1
0.2
-0.2
-0.5
0.6
1.7
-------
Table E-11. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
912
820.8
729.6
638.4
547.2
456
364.8
273.6
182.4
91.2
0
Hish CO
Conciupas DDm
912
803
715
620
527
441
347
254
166
80
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
926.7
817.5
729.3
634.1
540.9
454.7
360.5
267.3
179.1
92.9
1 flf)
-12 / /
n nnn/i
Aug 30, 2004
Difference, %
1.6
-0.4
-0.0
-0.7
-1.2
-0.3
-1.2
-2.3
-1.8
1.9
Table E-12. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer FID.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
904
813.6
723.2
632.8
542.4
452
361.6
271.2
180.8
90.4
0
HC1
Conciupas DDm
904
813
725
632
543
452
361
271
181
91
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
903.9
812.9
724.9
631.9
542.9
451.9
360.9
270.9
180.9
90.9
1.00
0.09
fl QQQQ
Oct 4, 2004
Difference, %
-0.0
-0.1
0.2
-0.1
0.1
-0.0
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.6
-------
Table E-13. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer Chemiluminescence.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
QT6
84.24
74.88
65.52
56.16
46.8
37.44
28.08
18.72
9.36
0
NOx
Conciupas DDm
Q3 6
83.9
74.8
65.5
56.2
46.8
37.4
28.1
18.8
9.4
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
93 7
84.0
74.9
65.6
56.2
46.8
37.4
28.1
18.8
9.4
1.00
0.06
fl QQQQ
Oct 4, 2004
Difference, %
0 1
-0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.3
-0.1
Table E-14. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
2.9
2.61
2.32
2.03
1.74
1.45
1.16
0.87
0.58
0.29
0
CO2
Conciupas DDm
2.9
2.608
2.325
2.031
1.745
1.46
1.168
0.877
0.587
0.2935
0.002
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
1 flf)
01
n nnnn
Oct 4, 2004
Difference, %
-0.1
-0.2
0.1
-0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
-0.9
-------
Table E-15. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
910
819
728
637
546
455
364
273
182
91
0
Low CO
Conciupas DDm
910
810
722
630
543
453
361
272
181
91
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
915.8
815.2
726.6
634.0
546.5
455.9
363.3
273.8
182.2
91.6
OQQ
03
n nnnn
Oct 4, 2004
Difference, %
0.6
-0.5
-0.2
-0.5
0.1
0.2
-0.2
0.3
0.1
0.7
Table E-16. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
903
812.7
722.4
632.1
541.8
451.5
361.2
270.9
180.6
90.3
0
Hish CO
Conciupas DDm
903
803
706
617
519
435
338
246
161
71
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
915.2
815.9
719.5
631.1
533.8
450.4
354.0
262.6
178.2
88.8
1.01
-18.32
fl QQQ9
Oct 4, 2004
Difference, %
1.3
0.4
-0.4
-0.2
-1.5
-0.3
-2.0
-3.0
-1.3
-1.6
-------
Table E-17. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer FID.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
858
772.2
686.4
600.6
514.8
429
343.2
257.4
171.6
85.8
0
HC1
Conciupas DDm
858
767
692
603
519
432
345
254
169
86
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
856.7
765.8
691.0
602.1
518.3
431.5
344.6
253.8
168.9
86.1
1 flf)
23
n nnnn
Jan 10, 2005
Difference, %
-0.2
-0.8
0.7
0.3
0.7
0.6
0.4
-1.4
-1.6
0.3
na
Table E-18. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer Chemiluminescence.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
93 57
84.213
74.856
65.499
56.142
46.785
37.428
28.071
18.714
9.357
0
NOx
Conciupas DDm
93 57
83.4
75.4
66.9
56.9
46.6
38.1
28.7
19
9.4
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
93 3
83.1
75.1
66.6
56.6
46.3
37.8
28.4
18.7
9.1
1 flf)
33
n nnn/:
Jan 10, 2005
Difference, %
-03
-1.3
0.4
1.7
0.8
-1.0
1.0
1.1
-0.2
-3.2
-------
Table E-19. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
2.909
2.6181
2.3272
2.0363
1.7454
1.4545
1.1636
0.8727
0.5818
0.2909
0
CO2
Conciupas DDm
2.909
2.61
2.359
2.064
1.77
1.485
1.186
0.875
0.5808
0.294
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
1 flf)
01
n nnno
Jan 10, 2005
Difference, %
-0.6
-0.9
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.3
1.0
-0.9
-1.8
-1.8
Table E-20. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
905
814.5
724
633.5
543
452.5
362
271.5
181
90.5
0
Low CO
Conciupas DDm
905
805
730
636
546
457
364
268
180
92
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
905.0
804.9
729.8
635.7
545.6
456.5
363.4
267.3
179.2
91.1
1.00
0.95
fl QQQ8
Jan 10, 2005
Difference, %
-0.0
-1.2
0.8
0.3
0.5
0.9
0.4
-1.5
-1.0
0.7
-------
Table E-21. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
908
817.2
726.4
635.6
544.8
454
363.2
272.4
181.6
90.8
0
Hish CO
Conciupas DDm
908
805
728
639
548
455
363
269
180
93
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
910.0
806.6
729.4
640.1
548.8
455.6
363.3
269.0
179.7
92.4
1 flf)
06
n nnno
Jan 10, 2005
Difference, %
0.2
-1.3
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.0
-1.3
-1.0
1.8
Table E-22. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer FID.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
907
816.3
725.6
634.9
544.2
453.5
362.8
272.1
181.4
90.7
0
HC1
Conciupas DDm
907
814
723
632
542
453
362
271
181
89
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
909.0
815.8
724.7
633.6
543.4
454.3
363.2
272.1
181.9
89.8
1.00
-0.68
fl QQQQ
Feb 24, 2005
Difference, %
0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.1
0.2
0.1
-0.0
0.3
-1.0
-------
Table E-23. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer Chemiluminescence.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
93 &
84.24
74.88
65.52
56.16
46.8
37.44
28.08
18.72
9.36
0
NOx
Conciupas DDm
Q3 6
85.8
75
64.8
55.5
46.8
37.2
28.2
18.3
9.3
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
93 4
85.6
74.9
64.7
55.5
46.8
37.3
28.3
18.5
9.5
1.01
-0.30
fl QQQ7
Feb 24, 2005
Difference, %
-03
1.6
-0.0
-1.2
-1.2
0.1
-0.4
0.9
-1.2
2.0
Table E-24. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
2.9025
2.61225
2.322
2.03175
1.7415
1.45125
1.161
0.87075
0.5805
0.29025
0
CO2
Conciupas DDm
2.9025
2.6214
2.329
2.045
1.7507
1.4526
1.175
0.8835
0.5939
0.2966
0.0045
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
1 flf)
01
nnnn
Feb 24, 2005
Difference, %
-0.2
0.1
-0.0
0.3
0.1
-0.5
0.5
0.4
0.7
-1.1
-------
Table E-25. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
901
810.9
720.8
630.7
540.6
450.5
360.4
270.3
180.2
90.1
0
Low CO
Conciupas DDm
901
807
717
626
537
449
358
268
181
90
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
904.6
810.2
719.9
628.6
539.3
451.0
359.6
269.3
182.0
90.7
1 flf)
36
n nnnn
Feb 24, 2005
Difference, %
0.4
-0.1
-0.1
-0.3
-0.2
0.1
-0.2
-0.4
1.0
0.6
Table E-26. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
905
814.5
724
633.5
543
452.5
362
271.5
181
90.5
0
Hish CO
Conciupas DDm
905
803
710
618
525
431
341
264
162
76.4
2.34
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
917.7
815.7
722.7
630.7
537.7
443.7
353.7
276.7
174.7
89.1
1.00
-12.74
n Qocn
Feb 24, 2005
Difference, %
1.4
0.1
-0.2
-0.4
-1.0
-1.9
-2.3
1.9
-3.5
-1.5
-------
Table E-27. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer FID.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
907
816.3
725.6
634.9
544.2
453.5
362.8
272.1
181.4
90.7
0
HC1
Conciupas DDm
907
809
713
621
534
454
370
277
184
91
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
915.7
816.4
719.1
625.9
537.7
456.7
371.6
277.3
183.1
88.8
OQQ
3 36
n nnn/:
Mar 28, 2005
Difference, %
1.0
0.0
-0.9
-1.4
-1.2
0.7
2.4
1.9
0.9
-2.0
Table E-28. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer Chemiluminescence.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
93 6
84.24
74.88
65.52
56.16
46.8
37.44
28.08
18.72
9.36
0
NOx
Conciupas DDm
93 6
85.8
75
64.8
55.5
46.8
37.2
28.2
18.3
9.3
0
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
93 4
85.6
74.9
64.7
55.5
46.8
37.3
28.3
18.5
9.5
101
30
n nnm
Mar 28, 2005
Difference, %
-03
1.6
-0.0
-1.2
-1.2
0.1
-0.4
0.9
-1.2
2.0
-------
Table E-29. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
2.9025
2.61225
2.322
2.03175
1.7415
1.45125
1.161
0.87075
0.5805
0.29025
0
CO2
Conciupas DDm
2.9025
2.5907
2.2869
1.9928
1.7118
1.4582
1.1864
0.8938
0.5939
0.2951
0.0045
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.3
OQQ
02
n nnn/:
Mar 28, 2005
Difference, %
0.9
-0.0
-0.8
-1.3
-1.2
0.8
2.3
2.3
1.0
-2.5
Table E-30. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
901
810.9
720.8
630.7
540.6
450.5
360.4
270.3
180.2
90.1
0
Low CO
Conciupas DDm
900
795
703
611
525
445
362
270
181
91
0
Slope
Intercept
K2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
915.3
808.3
714.5
620.8
533.2
451.6
367.1
273.3
182.7
90.9
0.98
1.77
n QQQ^
Mar 28, 2005
Difference, %
1.6
-0.3
-0.9
-1.6
-1.4
0.3
1.9
1.1
1.4
0.9
-------
Table E-31. Multipoint Calibration for Dynamometer NDIR.
Instrument
ConcstH, DDm
905
814.5
724
633.5
543
452.5
362
271.5
181
90.5
0
Hish CO
Conciupas DDm
899.26
793.03
694.79
600.29
513.25
433.39
353
264.88
174.93
85.1
2.34
V/rtIl/7
Intcrccvt
D2
Date
ConcuPO DDm
925.8
816.9
716.1
619.2
529.9
448.0
365.6
275.2
183.0
90.8
OQ8
-J j /
n nnon
Mar 28, 2005
Difference, %
2.3
0.3
-1.1
-2.3
-2.4
-1.0
1.0
1.4
1.1
0.4
-------
Table E-33. Daily PDF and Dynamometer QA Checks.
Date
July 15, 2004
July 16, 2004
July 17, 2004
July 18, 2004
July 19, 2004
July 20, 2004
July 21, 2004
July 22, 2004
July 23, 2004
July 24, 2004
July 26, 2004
July 27, 2004
July 28, 2004
July 29, 2004
July 30, 2004
July 3 1,2004
August 2,2004
August 3,2004
August 4,2004
August 5,2004
August 6,2004
August 7,2004
August 9,2004
August 10,2004
August 11, 2004
August 12,2004
August 13,2004
August 14,2004
August 16,2004
August 17,2004
August 18,2004
August 19,2004
August 20,2004
August 2 1,2004
August 23, 2004
August 24,2004
August 25,2004
August 26,2004
August 27,2004
August 28,2004
August 30,2004
PDF Speed,
rpm
1766
1769
1767
1767
1767
1767
1768
1748
1765
1767
1772
1767
1770
1768
1770
1768
1770
1770
1768
1770
1768
1768
1770
1770
1770
1770
1770
1768
1768
1770
1768
1770
1769
1769
1772
1772
1768
1768
1768
1768
1768
Actual Dyno
Speed, rpm
1942
1952
1980
1970
1934
1948
1942
1956
2004
1964
1984
1980
1982
1946
1962
1946
1934
1951
1948
1952
1946
1956
1959
1952
1945
1960
1948
1947
1953
1946
1950
1952
1960
1940
1952
1936
1953
1943
1950
1952
1954
Actual Dyno
Speed, mph
50.0
50.2
51.0
50.7
49.8
50.1
50.0
50.3
51.6
50.5
51.1
51.0
51.0
50.1
50.5
50.1
49.8
50.2
50.1
50.2
50.1
50.3
50.4
50.2
50.1
50.4
50.1
50.1
50.3
50.1
50.2
50.2
50.2
49.9
50.2
49.8
50.3
50.0
50.2
50.2
50.3
Measured
Dyno Speed,
mph
50.1
50.1
50.8
50.5
49.5
50.1
49.8
49.7
51.2
50.4
50.9
50.5
50.8
50
50.6
49.8
49.7
50
50.1
50.2
50
50.2
50.1
50.1
49.9
50.3
50
50
50.1
50
50.1
50.1
50.2
49.8
50.2
49.6
50.2
49.9
50.1
49.9
50.1
Coastdown
time, seconds
23.52
22.78
23.3
.
22.38
24.38
23.73
24.37
24.62
23.6
23.63
23.69
23.7
23.66
23.85
23.24
23.83
23.78
24.03
23.16
23.28
23.4
23.8
22.87
23.31
23.47
23.51
23.37
23.03
23.83
23.05
23.02
22.91
23.79
23.76
23.5
23.63
24.26
23.85
23.6
23.05
-------
Date
August 3 1,2004
Sept 1, 2004
Sept 2, 2004
Sept 8, 2004
Sept 9, 2004
Sept 10, 2004
Sept 11, 2004
Sept 13, 2004
Sept 14, 2004
Sept 15, 2004
Sept 16, 2004
Sept 17, 2004
Sept 18, 2004
Sept 20, 2004
Sept 2 1,2004
Sept 22, 2004
Sept 23, 2004
Sept 24, 2004
Sept 25, 2004
Sept 27, 2004
Sept 28, 2004
Sept 29, 2004
Sept 30, 2004
Oct 1, 2004
Jan 11, 2005
Jan 12, 2005
Jan 13, 2005
Jan 14, 2005
Jan 15, 2005
Jan 17, 2005
Jan 18,2005
Jan 19,2005
Jan 20,2005
Jan 2 1,2005
Jan 22,2005
Jan 25,2005
Jan 26,2005
Jan 27,2005
Jan 28,2005
Jan 29,2005
Jan 3 1,2005
Feb 1,2005
PDF Speed,
rpm
1768
1770
1768
1768
1770
1769
1768
1770
1768
1772
1770
1770
1770
1770
1770
1769
1769
1769
1769
1770
1770
1768
1772
1770
1770
1774
1772
1772
1776
1768
1768
1772
1770
1770
1770
1773
1774
1770
1772
1771
1772
1772
Actual Dyno
Speed, rpm
1959
1942
1936
1954
1941
1958
1953
1946
1964
1933
1956
1938
1942
1966
1976
1953
1954
1958
1944
1944
1957
1958
1952
1966
1962
1956
1956
1928
1958
1974
1940
1962
1954
1955
1977
1957
1988
1970
1964
1969
1962
1969
Actual Dyno
Speed, mph
50.4
50.0
49.8
50.3
50.0
50.4
50.3
50.1
50.5
49.7
50.3
49.9
50.0
50.6
50.9
50.3
50.3
50.4
50.0
50.0
50.4
50.4
50.2
50.6
50.5
50.3
50.3
49.6
50.4
50.8
49.9
50.5
50.3
50.3
50.9
50.4
51.2
50.7
50.5
50.7
50.5
50.7
Measured
Dyno Speed,
mph
50.3
49.9
49.6
50.1
49.8
50
50
49.9
50.4
49.6
50.2
49.7
49.9
50.5
50.6
50.3
50.2
50.2
49.8
49.9
50
50.3
50.1
50.4
50.3
50.1
49.9
49.4
50.4
50.4
50.3
50.2
50
49.9
50.3
50
50.8
50.3
50.2
50.3
50.2
50.3
Coastdown
time, seconds
23.17
23.15
23.9
23.04
23
23.5
23.33
23.02
23.75
23.73
22.77
23.95
23.74
23.54
23.78
23.72
23.28
23.12
22.92
23.72
23.72
23.21
23.24
23.79
-
22.8
22.82
20.2
20.89
20.5
20.89
21.59
22.09
21.44
21.74
21.13
21.56
21.41
21.21
21.25
22.18
22.24
-------
Date
Feb 2,2005
Feb 3,2005
Feb 4,2005
Feb 5,2005
Feb 7,2005
Feb 8,2005
Feb 9,2005
Feb 20,2005
Feb 11, 2005
Feb 12,2005
Feb 14,2005
Feb 15,2005
Feb 16,2005
Feb 17,2005
Feb 18,2005
Feb 19,2005
Feb 2 1,2005
Feb 22,2005
Feb 23,2005
Feb 24, 2005
Feb 25, 2005
Feb 26,2005
Feb 28,2005
March 1,2005
March 2,2005
March 3,2005
March 4,2005
March 5,2005
March 7,2005
March 8,2005
March 9,2005
March 10,2005
March 11, 2005
March 12,2005
March 14,2005
March 15,2005
March 16,2005
March 17,2005
March 18,2005
March 19,2005
March 2 1,2005
March 22,2005
March 23, 2005
PDF Speed,
rpm
1773
1771
1772
1772
1780
1772
1772
1772
1771
1772
1771
1772
1771
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1771
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1771
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1772
1773
1772
1773
1773
1772
1772
1771
1772
Actual Dyno
Speed, rpm
1970
1960
1964
1958
1962
1968
1952
1968
1983
1968
1961
1955
1980
1960
1974
1951
1967
1971
1959
1952
1963
1948
1946
1940
1957
1944
1925
1946
1942
1956
1952
1925
1954
1952
1949
1938
1958
1942
1938
1938
1948
1948
1950
Actual Dyno
Speed, mph
50.7
50.4
50.5
50.4
50.5
50.6
50.2
50.6
50.7
50.6
50.5
50.3
51.0
50.4
50.8
50.2
50.6
50.7
50.4
50.2
50.5
50.1
50.1
49.9
50.4
50.0
49.5
50.1
50.0
50.3
50.2
49.5
50.3
50.2
50.2
49.9
50.4
50.0
49.9
49.9
50.1
50.1
50.2
Measured
Dyno Speed,
mph
50.4
50.1
50.2
50.1
50.2
50.3
49.9
50.3
50.7
50.2
50.1
50
50.5
50.1
50.4
49.9
50.6
50.4
50.1
49.5
50.5
50.2
50.1
49.9
50.4
50.1
49.6
50.2
50.1
50.4
50.3
49.6
50.4
50.3
50.2
50
50.5
50.1
49.8
49.8
50.3
50.3
50.3
Coastdown
time, seconds
21.72
21.52
22.14
22.68
22.6
22.13
21.65
21.73
21.59
22.61
21.91
22.4
21.76
22.07
21.72
21.91
22.33
22.6
22.57
22.57
22.07
21.89
21.47
21.26
21.31
21.38
21.86
21.6
22.58
21.39
21.57
21.8
21.8
21.91
22.13
21.59
21.57
22.55
22.13
22.59
22.44
22.4
22.24
-------
Date
March 24,2005
March 25,2005
March 26,2005
March 28,2005
March 29,2005
March 30,2005
March 3 1,2005
April 1,2005
April 2,2005
April 4,2005
April 5,2005
April 6,2005
April 7,2005
April 8,2005
PDF Speed,
rpm
1774
1773
1772
1773
1773
1772
1772
1772
1772
1773
1772
1772
1772
1772
Actual Dyno
Speed, rpm
1930
1933
1924
1943
1930
1946
1932
1946
1940
1940
1924
1923
1944
1932
Actual Dyno
Speed, mph
49.7
49.7
49.5
50.0
49.7
50.1
49.7
50.1
49.9
49.9
49.5
49.5
50.0
49.7
Measured
Dyno Speed,
mph
49.8
49.9
49.6
50.1
49.8
50.3
49.9
50.3
50.1
50.1
49.8
49.8
50.3
49.9
Coastdown
time, seconds
22.16
22.41
22.16
22.28
22.7
22.4
22.32
22.47
-
22.52
23.09
22.57
22.89
22.26
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix F
Dynamometer Calculations
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Calculations for the Dynamometer Determined Regulated Emissions
Individual phase and weighted regulated emissions rates and fuel economy were
determined from both the modal and bag THC, CO, NOx, and CO2 analyses. Emission rates
were calculated according to procedures found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title
40, Part 86, Paragraph 86.144-90. Methanol, formaldehyde, and methane were not measured, so
emission rates for these compounds, as well as Non-Methane Hydrocarbon (NMHC) and Total
hydrocarbon equivalent (THCE) were not determined.
Calculations were performed within a Lotus 123 spreadsheet, KC Regdata.wk4, designed
specifically for this study. The spreadsheet contained macros to import and process the modal
data files and bag data files containing user input. The spreadsheet also served as a "log" file to
distribute regulated emission results to study participants during the course of the study and is
included as two separate files (one for Round 1 and one for Round 2) on the ERG study web site.
The spreadsheet contains 203 data fields (including 22 blank fields included to improve
readability) as listed in Table F-l. Specific calculations used for all calculated fields are
described in the comments column of the Table. In reporting weighted emissions, the same phase
weighting factors as used for the Federal Test Procedure were applied to this data set. Included
within the spreadsheet are intermediary calculations for the NOx correction factor, Vmix, and
dilution factor, as follows:
4-1
-------
NOx correction factor =!/(!- 0.0047*(H-75)),
where H = absolute humidity (grains H2O per Ib dry air)
= {(43.478)Ra * Psat} / (Pb - (Psat * Ra /100)}
where Ra = relative humidity (percent)
Pb = barometric pressure (in Hg)
Psat = saturated vapor pressure @ dry bulb temp (in Hg)
= 29.92* 218.167/Pw,
where Log(Pw) = [A(x-t) + B(x-t)2 + C(x-t)4] / [ t(l + D(x-t))] and
A = 3.244
B = 0.005868
C = 0.0000000117
D = .002188
x = 647.27
t = Tdry, Farenheit.
Vmix = Vo * N * {(Pb - Ppdp) * 528 / (760 * Tpdp)},
where Vo = Volume of gas pumped by the PDF per revolution (cu ft / revolution)
N = number of PDF revolutions per test phase.
Ppdp = PDF inlet pressure depression (mm Hg)
Tpdp = average temperature at PDF inlet (degrees Rankine)
Pb = barometric pressure (mm Hg)
The constant, Vo = 0.306 cu ft/rev, has been previously determined by propane injections. N is
also considered a constant, determined from PDF rpm and phase duration.
Dilution Factor = 13.4 / (CO2 + (HC + CO)* 10'4}
Where CC>2, HC, and CO are the average dilute concentrations.
Emission rates (grams/mile) for each test phase for the regulated emissions were
calculated from the following format:
HC (gm/mile) = HC (ppmC) * 10'6 * Vmix * 16.33 (gm /cu ft) /Miles
CO (gm/mile) = CO (ppm) * 10'6 * Vmix * 32.97 (gm/cu ft) /Miles
CO2 (gm/mile) = CO2 (%) * 10'4 * Vmix * 51.81 (gm/cu ft) /Miles
NOx (gm/mile) = NOx (ppm) * 10'6 * Vmix * 54.16 (gm/cu ft) /Miles
4-2
-------
Since the fuel properties of the tested consumer vehicles were unknown, fuel properties for a
"generic" fuel were used for fuel economy calculations. The control vehicle, however, was
fueled with Indolene, so fuel properties for Indolene were used when performing fuel economy
calculations for the control vehicle. Fuel economy was calculated as follows:
Fuel Economy (mpg) = CGAL / {(.429 * CO) + (.273 * CO2) + (0.8646 *HC},
where CGAL = grams C / gallon fuel = 2350.00 and CO, CO2, and HC are grams/mile emitted
per test phase.
4-3
-------
Table F-l. Data Fields for the Regulated Emission Calculation Spreadsheet.
Data
Field #
1
2
o
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Label
Run#
Veh.Tag #
Veh Yr, Make, Model
Odometer
Inertia
Hp@50mph
Time
Date
Comments
(Blank Field)
Vo
PDF Speed
Ph Length 1
Ph Length 2
Ph Length 3
Pi pdp
Pbaro.
Tpdp 1
Tpdp 2
Tpdp 3
Vmix 1
Vmix 2
Vmix 3
(Blank Field)
Units
Miles
Lbs
Hp
ACF/Rev
Rpm
Seconds
Seconds
Seconds
mmHg
mmffg
degreesC
degreesC
degreesC
Cu.Ft
Cu.Ft
Cu.Ft
Source
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Constant
Constant
Constant
Keyboard Input
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Example Value
84101
763TTY
2004 Toyota Camry
169043
3500
7.2
1:22 p.m.
07/30/2004
0.306
1770
300
1136
300
20.46
742.87
46.36
46.91
46.23
2361.87
8928.29
2362.83
Comment
Test number
Vehicle License Plate number
Vehicle Make,model, and model year
Vehicle odometer reading, may not be actual miles
Dynamometer test inertia used
Dynamometer load used
Test start time
Test date
Positive displacement pump (PDP) volume per revolution
PDP speed
Phase 1 duration
Phase 2 duration
Phase 3 duration
PDP inlet pressure depression
Barometric pressure
PDP inlet air average temperature for Phase 1
PDP inlet air average temperature for Phase 2
PDP inlet air average temperature for Phase 3
Vo * (PDP Speed /Ph Length 1 /60) * {(Pbaro -
Pi pdp)/760} * {528 / ((Tpdp 1 * 9 / 5) + 32 + 460)}
Vo * (PDP Speed /Ph Length 2 /60) * {(Pbaro -
Pi pdp)/760} * {528 / ((Tpdp 2 * 9 / 5) + 32 + 460)}
Vo * (PDP Speed /Ph Length 3 /60) * {(Pbaro -
Pi pdp)/760} * {528 / ((Tpdp 3 * 9 / 5) + 32 + 460)}
4-4
-------
Data
Field #
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
o o
JJ
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
Label
Tamb
Rel Hum
DiyBulbT
PsatDiy
Spec Humidity
NOx Corr Fac
(Blank Field)
RR Spd 1
RR Spd 2
RR Spd 3
RR Dist 1
RR Dist 2
RR Dist 3
(Blank Field)
HC 1 Exh m
HC 1 Bkg m
HC 2 Exh m
HC 2 Bkg m
HC 3 Exh m
HC 3 Bkg m
Units
F
%
degrees K
inHg
Grains/lb
MPH
MPH
MPH
Miles
Miles
Miles
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
Source
Realtime
Realtime
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Example Value
77.4
49.9
298.4
0.94648
71.31191
0.98296
14.3732
27.5901
14.2443
1.198
8.706
1.187
102.562
2.733
27.095
2.733
15.615
2.733
Comment
Average ambient temperature during all test Phases and
hot soak.
Average relative humidity during all test Phases and hot
soak.
(Tamb-32)*(5/9)+273.15
29.92 * 218.167 / (@EXP(@LN(10) * (647.27 -
DryBulbT) / DryBulbT * (3.2437814 + 0.00586826 *
(647.27 - DryBulbT) + 1.1702379E-008 * (647.27 -
DryBulbT)A3) / (1 + (0.0021878462 * (647.27-
DryBulbT)))))
4347.8 * (Rel Hum/ 100) * PsatDry / {(Pbaro / 25.4) -
PsatDry * (Rel Hum/ 100)}
1 / {1 - 0.0047 *(Spec Humidity - 75)}
Average speed for Phase 1 (t=l to 301 seconds)
Average speed for Phase 2 (t=302 to 1437 seconds)
Average speed for Phase 3 (t=2037 to 2337 seconds)
Test distance for phase 1=RR Spd 1 * Ph Length I/
3600
Test distance for phase 2= RR Spd 2 * Ph Length 21
3600
Test distance for phase 3= RR Spd 3 * Ph Length 3/
3600
Avg HC concentration Phase 1 (t = 1 to 301 seconds)
Avg HC concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494 to
1994 seconds)
Avg HC concentration Phase 2 (t = 3 17 to 1437 seconds)
Avg HC concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494 to
1994 seconds)
Avg HC concentration Phase 3 (t = 2037 to 2337 seconds)
Avg HC concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494 to
1994 seconds)
4-5
-------
Data
Field #
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
Label
(Blank Field)
NOx 1 Exh m
NOx 1 Bkg m
NOx 2 Exh m
NOx 2 Bkg m
NOx 3 Exh m
NOx 3 Bkg m
(Blank Field)
CO 1 Exh m
CO 1 Bkg m
CO 2 Exh m
CO 2 Bkg m
CO 3 Exh m
CO 3 Bkg m
(Blank Field)
CO2 1 Exh m
CO2 1 Bkg m
CO2 2 Exh m
CO2 2 Bkg m
CO2 3 Exh m
CO2 3 Bkg m
(Blank Field)
Units
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
%
%
%
%
%
%
Source
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Example Value
42.574
0.008
36.455
0.008
24.800
0.008
613.094
0.379
675.482
0.379
181.040
0.379
0.631
0.044
0.723
0.044
0.515
0.044
Comment
Avg NOx concentration Phase 1 (t = 1 to 301 seconds)
Avg NOx concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494
to 1994 seconds)
Avg NOx concentration Phase 2 (t = 3 17 to 1437 seconds)
Avg NOx concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494
to 1994 seconds)
Avg NOx concentration Phase 3 (t = 2037 to 2337
seconds)
Avg NOx concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494
to 1994 seconds)
Avg CO concentration Phase 1 (t = 1 to 301 seconds)
Avg CO concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494 to
1994 seconds)
Avg CO concentration Phase 2 (t = 3 17 to 1437 seconds)
Avg CO concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494 to
1994 seconds)
Avg CO concentration Phase 3 (t = 2037 to 2337 seconds)
Avg CO concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494 to
1994 seconds)
Avg CO2 concentration Phase 1 (t = 1 to 301 seconds)
Avg CO2 concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494
to 1994 seconds)
Avg CO2 concentration Phase 2 (t = 3 17 to 1437 seconds)
Avg CO2 concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494
to 1994 seconds)
Avg CO2 concentration Phase 3 (t = 2037 to 2337
seconds)
Avg CO2 concentration Hot Soak Background (t = 1494
to 1994 seconds)
4-6
-------
Data
Field #
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Label
SPCO2
DilFac 1 m
DilFac 2 m
DilFac 3 m
(Blank Field)
HC Density
NOx Density
CO Density
CO2 Density
HC 1 mass m
HC 2 mass m
HC 3 mass m
NOx 1 mass m
NOx 2 mass m
NOx 3 mass m
NOx 1 mass me
NOx 2 mass me
Units
%
gm/cuft
gm/cuft
gm/cuft
gm/cuft
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Source
Constant
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Constant
Constant
Constant
Constant
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Example Value
13.40
19.07
16.90
25.08
16.33
54.16
32.97
51.81
3.856
3.576
0.501
5.445
17.625
3.173
5.352
17.324
Comment
Engine out CO2 (%) emitted at Stochiometry =13.4 for
both INDOLENE and UNKNOWN fuels.
Dilution Factor Phase 1 = SPCO2 / {CO2 1 Exh m +
(CO 1 Exh m * 0.0001) +(HC 1 Exh m* 0.0001)}
Dilution Factor Phase 2 = SPCO2 / {CO2 2 Exh m +
(CO 2 Exh m * 0.0001) +(HC 2 Exh m* 0.0001)}
Dilution Factor Phase 3 = SPCO2/{CO2 3 Exh m +
(CO 3 Exh m * 0.0001) +(HC 3 Exh m* 0.0001)}
Density of HC
Density of NOx
Density of CO
Density of CO2
HC mass for Phase 1 = Vmix 1 * HC Density *
{HC Exh 1 m-HC Bkg 1 m * (1 - 11 DilFac 1 m)} /
1,000,000
HC mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 * HC Density *
{HC Exh 2 m - HC Bkg 2 m * (1 - I/ DilFac 2 m)} /
1,000,000
HC mass for Phase 3 = Vmix 3 * HC Density *
{HC Exh 3 m - HC Bkg 3 m * (1 - 11 DilFac 3 m)} /
1,000,000
NOx mass for Phase 1 = Vmix 1 * NOx Density *
{NOx Exh 1 m-NOx Bkg 1 m * (1 - I/ DilFac 1 m)}
/ 1,000,000
NOx mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 * NOx Density *
{NOx Exh 2 m-NOx Bkg 2 m * (1 - 11 DilFac 2 m)}
/ 1,000,000
NOx mass for Phase 3 = Vmix 3 * NOx Density *
{NOx Exh 3 m-NOx Bkg 3 m * (1 - I/ DilFac 3 m)}
/ 1,000,000
NOx (corrected) mass for Phase 1 = Vmix 1 *
NOx Density * NOx Corr Fac * {NOx Exh 1 m -
NOx Bkg 1 m *(!-!/ DilFac 1 m)} / 1,000,000
NOx (corrected) mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 *
4-7
-------
Data
Field #
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Label
NOx 3 mass me
CO 1 mass m
CO 2 mass m
CO 3 mass m
CO2 1 mass m
CO2 2 mass m
C2O 3 mass m
(Blank Field)
HC 1 ER m
HC 2 ER m
HC 3 ER m
NOx 1 ER m
NOx 2 ER m
NOx 3 ER m
Units
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
Source
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Example Value
3.119
47.714
198.734
14.075
721.378
3152.989
578.488
3.219
0.411
0.422
4.546
2.024
2.673
Comment
NOx Density * NOx Corr Fac * {NOx Exh 2 m -
NOx Bkg 2 m * (1 - 1/DilFac 2 m)} / 1,000,000
NOx (corrected) mass for Phase 3 = 'Vmix 3 *
NOx Density * NOx Corr Fac * {NOx Exh 3 m -
NOx Bkg 3 m * (1 - 1/DilFac 3 m)} / 1,000,000
CO mass for Phase 1 = Vmix 1 * CO Density *
{CO Exh 1 m- CO Bkg 1 m * (1 - 1/DilFac 1 m)} /
1,000,000
CO mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 * CO Density *
{CO Exh 2 m - CO Bkg 2 m * (1 - 1/DilFac 2 m)} /
1,000,000
CO mass for Phase 3 = Vmix 3 * CO Density *
{CO Exh 3 m - CO Bkg 3 m * (1 - 1/DilFac 3 m)} /
1,000,000
CO2 mass for Phase 1 = Vmix 1 * CO2 Density *
{CO2 Exh 1 m-CO2 Bkg 1 m * (1 - 1/ DilFac 1 m)}
7100
CO2 mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 * CO2 Density *
{CO2 Exh 2 m-CO2 Bkg 2 m* (1 - 1/ DilFac 2 m)}
7100
CO2 mass for Phase 3 = Vmix 3 * CO2 Density *
{CO2 Exh 3 m-CO2 Bkg 3 m* (1 - 1/ DilFac 3 m)}
7100
HC Emission Rate for Phase 1 = HC 1 mass m 7
RR Dist 1
HC Emission Rate for Phase 2 = HC 2 mass m 7
RR Dist 2
HC Emission Rate for Phase 3 = HC 3 mass m 7
RR Dist 3
NOx Emission Rate for Phase 1 = NOx 1 mass m 7
RR Dist 1
NOx Emission Rate for Phase 2 = NOx 2 mass m 7
RR Dist 2
NOx Emission Rate for Phase 2 = NOx 2 mass m 7
RR Dist 2
4-8
-------
Data
Field #
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
Label
NOx 1 ER me
NOx 2 ER me
NOx 3 ER me
CO 1 ER m
CO 2 ER m
CO 3 ER m
CO2 1 ER m
CO2 2 ER m
CO2 3 ER m
(Blank Field)
HC wt ER m
NOx wt ER m
NOx wt ER me
CO wt ER m
CO2 wt ER m
Units
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
Source
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Example Value
4.469
1.990
2.627
39.836
22.827
11.857
602.271
362.153
487.342
0.558
2.200
2.162
22.961
383.202
Comment
Corrected NOx Emission Rate for Phase 1 =
NOx 1 mass mc/RR Dist 1
Corrected NOx Emission Rate for Phase 2 =
NOx 2 mass mc/RR Dist 2
Corrected NOx Emission Rate for Phase 3 =
NOx 3 mass mc/RR Dist 3
CO Emission Rate for Phase 1 = CO 1 mass m /
RR Dist 1
CO Emission Rate for Phase 2 = CO 2 mass m /
RR Dist 2
CO Emission Rate for Phase 3 = CO 3 mass m /
RR Dist 3
CO2 Emission Rate for Phase 1 = CO2 1 mass m /
RR Dist 1
CO2 Emission Rate for Phase 2 = CO2_2_mass_m /
RR Dist 2
CO2 Emission Rate for Phase 3 = CO2 3 mass m /
RR Dist 3
Weighted HC emission rate = 0.43 *{(HC 1 mass m
+HC_2_mass_m)/ (RR_Dist_l + RR_Dist_2)} + 0.57 *
{(HC 3 mass m + HC 2 mass m)/(RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
Weighted NOx emission rate = 0.43 *{(NOx 1 mass m
+NOx_2_mass_m)/ (RR_Dist_l + RR_Dist_2)} + 0.57 *
{(NOx 3 mass m + NOx 2 mass m)/(RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
Weighted NOx (corrected) emission rate = 0.43
*{(NOx 1 mass me +NOx 2 mass me)/ (RR Dist 1 +
RR_Dist_2)} + 0.57 * {(NOx_3_mass_mc +
NOx 2 mass mc)/(RR Dist 3 +RR Dist 2)}
Weighted CO emission rate = 0.43 *{(CO_l_mass_m
+CO_2_mass_m)/ (RR_Dist_l + RR_Dist_2)} + 0.57 *
{(CO 3 mass m + CO 2 mass m)/(RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
Weighted CO2 emission rate = 0.43 *{(CO2_l_mass_m
+CO2_2_mass_m)/ (RR_Dist_l + RR_Dist_2)} + 0.57 *
4-9
-------
Data
Field #
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
Label
(Blank Field)
CRHC
CGAL
FE 1 m
FE 2 m
FE 3 m
FE wt m
(Blank Field)
HC 1 Exh b
HC 1 Bkg b
HC 2 Exh b
HC 2 Bkg b
HC 3 Exh b
HC 3 Bkg b
(Blank Field)
NOx 1 Exh b
NOx 1 Bkg b
NOx 2 Exh b
NOx 2 Bkg b
NOx 3 Exh b
Units
Fuel Wt% C
gmC/galFuel
mpg
mpg
mpg
mpg
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
ppmC
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Source
Constant
Constant
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Example Value
0.840
2350.000
12.76
21.56
16.97
20.45
93.0
4.0
30.0
4.0
18.0
5.0
27.7
0.0
25.1
0.1
23.4
Comment
{(CO2 3 mass m+CO2 2 mass m)/(RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
Weight percent carbon in fuel / 100 = 0.867 for
INDOLENE and 0.840 for UNKNOWN fuels.
Carbon density in fuel = 2434 for INDOLENE and 2350
for UNKNOWN fuels.
Fuel Economy for Phase 1 = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC 1 ER m + 0.429 * CO 1 ER m + 0.273 *
CO2 1 ER m)
Fuel Economy for Phase 2 = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC 2 ER m + 0.429*CO 2 ER m + 0.273*
CO2 2 ER m)
Fuel Economy for Phase 3 = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC 3 ER m + 0.429 * CO 3 ER m + 0.273 *
CO2 3 ER m)
Weighted Fuel Economy = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC_wt_ER_m + 0.429 * CO_wt_ER_m + 0.273 *
CO2 wt ER m)
Bag HC diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 1
Bag HC background concentration for Phase 1
Bag HC diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 2
Bag HC background concentration for Phase 2
Bag HC diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 3
Bag HC background concentration for Phase 3
Bag NOx diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 1
Bag NOx background concentration for Phase 1
Bag NOx diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 2
Bag NOx background concentration for Phase 2
Bag NOx diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 3
4-10
-------
Data
Field #
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
Label
NOx 3 Bkg b
(Blank Field)
CO 1 Exh b
CO 1 Bkg b
CO 2 Exh b
CO 2 Bkg b
CO 3 Exh b
CO 3 Bkg b
(Blank Field)
CO2 1 Exh b
CO2 1 Bkg b
CO2 2 Exh b
CO2 2 Bkg b
CO2 3 Exh b
CO2 3 Bkg b
(Blank Field)
DilFac 1 b
DilFac 2 b
DilFac 3 b
(Blank Field)
HC 1 mass b
HC 2 mass b
HC 3 mass b
Units
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
Ppm
%
%
%
%
%
%
Gm
Gm
Gm
Source
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Keyboard Input
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Example Value
0.2
601.0
0.0
661.0
0.0
183.0
0.0
0.6319
0.0419
0.7136
0.0404
0.5300
0.0449
19.11
17.12
24.36
3.441
3.825
0.509
Comment
Bag NOx background concentration for Phase 3
Bag CO diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 1
Bag CO background concentration for Phase 1
Bag CO diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 2
Bag CO background concentration for Phase 2
Bag CO diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 3
Bag CO background concentration for Phase 3
Bag CO2 diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 1
Bag CO2 background concentration for Phase 1
Bag CO2 diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 2
Bag CO2 background concentration for Phase 2
Bag CO2 diluted exhaust concentration for Phase 3
Bag CO2 background concentration for Phase 3
Dilution Factor Phase 1 = SPCO2 / {CO2 1 Exh b +
(CO 1 Exh b * 0.0001) +(HC 1 Exh b * 0.0001)}
Dilution Factor Phase 2 = SPCO2 / {CO2 2 Exh b +
(CO 2 Exh b * 0.0001) +(HC 2 Exh b * 0.0001)}
Dilution Factor Phase 3 = SPCO2/{CO2 3 Exh m +
(CO 3 Exh m * 0.0001) +(HC 3 Exh m* 0.0001)}
HC mass for Phase 1 = 'Vmix 1 * HC Density *
{HC Exh 1 b -HC Bkg 1 b * (1 - I/ DilFac 1 b)} /
1,000,000
HC mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 * HC Density *
{HC Exh 2 b -HC Bkg 2 b * (1 - 11 DilFac 2 b)} /
1,000,000
HC mass for Phase 3 = 'Vmix 3 * HC Density *
{HC Exh 3 b -HC Bkg 3 b * (1 - I/ DilFac 3 b)} /
4-11
-------
Data
Field #
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
Label
NOx 1 mass b
NOx 2 mass b
NOx 3 mass b
NOx 1 mass be
NOx 2 mass be
NOx 3 mass be
CO 1 mass b
CO 2 mass b
CO 3 mass b
CO2 1 mass b
CO2 2 mass b
C2O 3 mass b
Units
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Gm
Source
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Example Value
3.548
12.091
2.966
3.488
11.885
2.915
46.800
194.576
14.256
724.662
3125.115
596.042
Comment
1,000,000
NOx mass for Phase 1 = 'Vmix 1 * NOx Density *
{NOx Exh 1 b -NOx Bkg 1 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 1 b)} /
1,000,000
NOx mass for Phase 2 = 'Vmix 2 * NOx Density *
{NOx Exh 2 b -NOx Bkg 2 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 2 b)} /
1,000,000
NOx mass for Phase 3 = 'Vmix 3 * NOx Density *
{NOx Exh 3 b -NOx Bkg 3 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 3 b)} /
1,000,000
NOx (corrected) mass for Phase 1 = 'Vmix 1 *
NOx Density * NOx Corr Fac * {NOx Exh 1 b -
NOx Bkg 1 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 1 b)} / 1,000,000
NOx (corrected) mass for Phase 2 = 'Vmix 2 *
NOx Density * NOx Corr Fac * {NOx Exh 2 b -
NOx Bkg 2 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 2 b)} / 1,000,000
NOx (corrected) mass for Phase 3 = 'Vmix 3 *
NOx Density * NOx Corr Fac * {NOx Exh 3 b -
NOx Bkg 3 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 3 b)} / 1,000,000
CO mass for Phase 1 = 'Vmix 1 * CO Density *
{CO Exh 1 b - CO Bkg 1 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 1 b)} /
1,000,000
CO mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 * CO Density *
{CO Exh 2 b - CO Bkg 2 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 2 b)} /
1,000,000
CO mass for Phase 3 = 'Vmix 3 * CO Density *
{CO Exh 3 b - CO Bkg 3 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 3 b)} /
1,000,000
CO2 mass for Phase 1 = Vmix 1 * CO2 Density *
{CO2 Exh 1 b - CO2 Bkg 1 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 1 b)} /
100
CO2 mass for Phase 2 = Vmix 2 * CO2 Density *
{CO2 Exh 2 b - CO2 Bkg 2 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 2 b)} /
100
CO2 mass for Phase 3 = Vmix 3 * CO2 Density *
{CO2 Exh 3 b - CO2 Bkg 3 b * (1 - 1/DilFac 3 b)} /
100
4-12
-------
Data
Field #
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
Label
(Blank Field)
HC 1 ER b
HC 2 ER b
HC 3 ER b
NOx 1 ER b
NOx 2 ER b
NOx 3 ER b
NOx 1 ER be
NOx 2 ER be
NOx 3 ER be
CO 1 ER b
CO 2 ER b
CO 3 ER b
CO2 1 ER b
CO2 2 ER b
CO2 3 ER b
(Blank Field)
HC wt ER b
Units
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
Source
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Example Value
2.873
0.439
0.429
2.963
1.389
2.499
2.912
1.365
2.456
39.073
22.349
12.010
605.013
358.952
502.130
0.565
Comment
HC Emission Rate for Phase 1 = HC 1 mass b /
RR Dist 1
HC Emission Rate for Phase 2 = HC 2 mass b /
RR Dist 2
HC Emission Rate for Phase 3 = HC 3 mass b /
RR Dist 3
NOx Emission Rate for Phase 1 = NOx 1 mass b /
RR Dist 1
NOx Emission Rate for Phase 2 = NOx 2 mass b /
RR Dist 2
NOx Emission Rate for Phase 2 = NOx 2 mass b /
RR Dist 2
Corrected NOx Emission Rate for Phase 1 =
NOx 1 mass bc/RR Dist 1
Corrected NOx Emission Rate for Phase 2 =
NOx 2 mass bc/RR Dist 2
Corrected NOx Emission Rate for Phase 3 =
NOx 3 mass bc/RR Dist 3
CO Emission Rate for Phase 1 = CO 1 mass b /
RR Dist 1
CO Emission Rate for Phase 2 = CO_2_mass_b /
RR Dist 2
CO Emission Rate for Phase 3 = CO 3 mass b /
RR Dist 3
CO2 Emission Rate for Phase 1 = CO2_l_mass_b /
RR Dist 1
CO2 Emission Rate for Phase 2 = CO2 2 mass b /
RR Dist 2
CO2 Emission Rate for Phase 3 = CO2_3_mass_b /
RR Dist 3
Weighted HC emission rate = 0. 43 *{(HC 1 mass b
+HC 2 mass b)/(RR Dist 1+RR Dist 2)} + 0.57*
{(HC 3 mass b + HC 2 mass b)/(RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
4-13
-------
Data
Field #
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
Label
NOx wt ER b
NOx wt ER mb
CO wt ER b
CO2 wt ER b
(Blank Field)
FE 1 b
FE 2 b
FE 3 b
FE wt b
(Blank Field)
FR Dist 1
FR Dist 2
FR Dist 3
Avg Tork 1
Avg Tork 2
Units
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
gm/mile
mpg
mpg
mpg
mpg
Miles
Miles
Miles
Ft-lbs
Ft-lbs
Source
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Calculated
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Example Value
1.547
1.520
22.512
381.540
12.748
21.769
16.480
20.561
1.196
8.615
1.172
2.235
6.363
Comment
Weighted NOx emission rate = 0.43 *{(NOx 1 mass b
+NOx 2 mass b)/ (RR Dist 1 + RR Dist 2)} + 0.57 *
{(NOx 3 mass b + NOx 2 mass b)/(RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
Weighted NOx (corrected) emission rate = 0.43
*{(NOx_l_mass_bc +NOx_2_mass_bc)/ (RR_Dist_l +
RR_Dist_2)} + 0.57 * {(NOx_3_mass_bc +
NOx 2 mass bc)/(RR Dist 3 +RR Dist 2)}
Weighted CO emission rate = 0.43 *{(CO 1 mass b
+CO 2 mass b)/(RR Dist 1+RR Dist 2)} + 0.57*
{(CO 3 mass b + CO 2 mass b) / (RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
Weighted CO2 emission rate = 0.43 *{(CO2 1 mass b
+CO2_2_mass_b)/ (RR_Dist_l + RR_Dist_2)} + 0.57 *
{(CO2 3 mass b + CO2 2 mass b) / (RR Dist 3 +
RR Dist 2)}
Fuel Economy for Phase 1 = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC 1 ER b + 0.429 * CO 1 ER b + 0.273 *
CO2 1 ER b)
Fuel Economy for Phase 2 = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC 2 ER b + 0.429 * CO 2 ER b + 0.273 *
CO2 2 ER b)
Fuel Economy for Phase 3 = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC 3 ER b + 0.429 * CO 3 ER b + 0.273 *
CO2 3 ER b)
Weighted Fuel Economy = GOAL / ( CRHC *
HC wt ER b + 0.429 * CO wt ER b + 0.273 *
CO2 wt ER b)
Not used - Front roll Distance Phase 1
Not used - Front roll Distance Phase 2
Not used - Front roll Distance Phase 3
Not used - Average torque Phase 1
Not used - Average torque Phase 2
4-14
-------
Data
Field #
201
202
203
Label
Avg Tork 3
PAU Temp.
Amb. HC
Units
Ft-lbs
C
ppmC
Source
Realtime
Realtime
Realtime
Example Value
2.111
29.78
2.07
Comment
Not used - Average torque Phase 3
Not used - Average dynamometer PAU temperature over
entire test cycle
Not used - Average HC concentration inside test facility
over entire test cycle.
4-15
-------
4-16
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix G
Other Round 1 Data
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Weighted Emissions and Fuel Economy
-------
Weighted Regulated Emissions and Fuel Economy for the Round 2 Kansas City Test Fleet.
RUN#
84393
84394
84396
84397
84398
84399
84401
84402
84403
84404
84406
84407
84408
84409
84411
84412
84413
84414
84415
84416
84418
84419
84420
84421
84422
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1999 Chrysler 300M
2000 Honda Odyssey
1995 Ford Escort
1975 Chevrolet Silverado 20 PU
2001 Honda Accord
1997 Honda Accord
1998 Plymouth Voyager
1991 Honda Civic
2000 Dodge Caravan
1997 Dodge Caravan
1995 Toyota Corolla
1989 Pontiac GrandAm
2002 Mercury Sable
1999 Chevrolet Malibu
1996 Saturn SC
1996 Honda Civic
1979 Ford F250PU
2003 Chevrolet Impala
1999 Dodge Durango
1998 Honda Civic
1997 Pontiac Grand Am
1998 Chevrolet Lumina
2000 Honda Accord
2000 Saturn Sedan
1998 Jeep Cherokee
Odometer
Miles
90240
74601
106996
2893
62350
82926
168876
220022
85198
96455
107983
123575
29501
79925
78346
140479
5797
11340
95999
118218
58100
79187
84180
51721
137053
Inertia
Lbs
3500
4500
2750
4000
3500
3000
4000
2500
3500
3500
2500
3000
3500
3500
2500
2500
3500
3500
5000
2500
3000
3500
3500
2750
3500
Hp(S}50mph
5.8
9.6
5.6
13.9
7.8
4.9
7.0
6.5
7.2
7.2
6.0
5.9
6.8
5.8
6.0
6.9
10.5
2.9
16.9
5.1
3.8
5.5
7.5
4.0
11.8
HC
gm/mile
0.34
0.31
0.30
4.96
0.20
0.25
0.34
1.02
0.61
0.58
0.79
2.90
0.38
0.50
0.53
0.56
1.88
0.12
0.33
0.19
0.24
0.45
0.25
0.24
1.50
NOx
gm/mile
0.30
0.30
1.39
3.55
0.16
0.29
0.96
2.62
0.33
0.83
0.99
4.59
0.23
1.15
0.84
0.47
1.42
0.11
1.63
0.08
0.90
0.52
0.36
0.41
5.27
CO
gm/mile
3.19
5.25
8.74
73.86
3.07
6.72
4.57
17.42
5.21
5.83
9.47
24.18
0.86
8.38
5.42
9.62
34.23
1.60
8.13
6.60
3.92
6.90
5.16
2.29
16.91
C02
gm/mile
451.26
532.05
387.69
563.04
404.32
401.31
497.11
339.37
475.94
520.99
358.70
368.82
488.23
434.57
385.40
307.12
708.01
451.14
717.79
282.54
439.87
443.85
381.06
364.46
524.61
Fuel Economy
mpg
18.82
15.90
21.40
12.40
21.01
20.86
17.03
23.27
17.71
16.18
22.89
20.71
17.54
19.16
21.76
26.57
11.21
18.96
11.77
29.33
19.27
18.87
22.07
23.34
15.49
-------
RUN#
84424
84425
84426
84427
84428
84430
84431
84432
84433
84436
84437
84438
84439
84440
84442
84443
84444
84445
84446
84448
84449
84451
84452
84453
84455
84456
84457
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1995 Ford Explorer
1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo
2001 Saturn Sedan
2001 Mitsubishi Galant
1998 Chevrolet Malibu
1990 Dodge Spirit
1991 Mercury Grand Marquis S/W
1999 Saturn Sedan
1997 Jeep Wrangler
1995 Chevrolet S10PU
1994 Toyota Camry
2001 Buick Century
1995 Pontiac Bonneville
1995 Buick Park Avenue
1994 Toyota Camry
1991 Geo Prizm
2003 Chevrolet Tracker
2001 Saturn Sedan
2000 Toyota Sienna
1999 Plymouth Voyager
1994 Buick Regal
1994 Buick Regal
1995 Ford Taurus
1995 Nissan Maxima
1995 Ford Mustang
1993 Pontiac Grand Prix
1995 Ford Crown Vic
Odometer
Miles
162634
179121
44251
51764
107047
93661
19292
98565
97532
124976
131874
33749
168145
144956
131894
132326
29519
67290
137493
79230
92177
92214
139316
181395
146289
177931
179731
Inertia
Lbs
4500
4000
2750
2750
3500
3000
4000
2500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
4000
3500
2500
3000
3000
4000
4000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
4000
Hp(%50mph
11.5
13.1
3.7
3.7
5.9
8.2
10.3
5.5
16.1
10.8
7.2
5.3
5.3
7.2
7.2
7.4
12.7
6.4
6.5
6.4
5.6
5.6
6.5
6.5
7.5
5.0
8.5
HC
gm/mile
0.24
2.23
0.22
0.11
0.38
0.63
1.15
0.41
0.28
0.37
0.30
0.11
0.39
0.36
0.30
0.60
0.31
0.24
0.76
0.44
0.44
0.40
0.27
0.53
0.24
1.46
0.49
NOx
gm/mile
2.39
5.50
0.10
0.13
0.72
1.75
1.36
0.29
0.32
0.64
0.34
0.10
1.64
1.10
0.35
1.94
0.20
0.24
0.63
0.41
1.14
1.25
1.10
1.08
0.44
1.54
2.03
CO
gm/mile
4.04
16.13
6.53
0.88
5.57
16.22
12.66
2.92
3.62
9.30
2.59
2.14
5.67
5.39
2.63
6.63
1.20
2.18
5.18
6.22
7.93
7.13
6.27
4.10
4.66
25.72
6.97
CO2
gm/mile
582.51
535.87
307.26
355.37
420.56
391.82
512.73
301.79
489.05
494.16
432.41
440.98
465.18
496.96
473.49
333.20
451.84
425.97
512.24
524.29
475.53
463.18
461.35
431.58
429.22
490.92
493.93
Fuel Economy
mpg
14.60
15.15
27.05
24.11
20.00
20.53
16.05
27.98
17.37
16.88
19.68
19.36
18.11
16.99
17.99
24.92
18.93
20.01
16.47
16.08
17.59
18.10
18.24
19.58
19.69
16.07
17.00
-------
RUN#
84458
84459
84462
84463
84464
84465
84467
84468
84469
84470
84472
84473
84474
84475
84477
84479
84482
84483
84484
84485
84487
84488
84489
84490
84492
84493
84494
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1993 Ford Aerostar
1 992 Ford Aerostar
1989 Plymouth Voyager
1995 Ford Contour
1994 Dodge Intrepid
1994 Chevrolet Lumina APV
1988 Ford Ranger PU
1994 Chevrolet Lumina APV
1989 Dodge Caravan
1973 Mercedes 280 SE
1977 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
1996 Ford Explorer
1988 Honda Civic
1986 Ford Tempo
1989 Dodge Ram 50
1996 Dodge Caravan
1979BuickLasabre
1996 Dodge Neon
1979BuickLesabre
1991 Cadillac Fleetwood
1992 Mazda B2200PU
1995BuickLesabre
1987 Toyota PU
1991 Cadillac Fleetwood
1984 Chevy C-10 Silverado
2004 Ford Freestar Minivan
1997 Ford Ranger PU
Odometer
Miles
147319
164560
145307
104083
145950
124172
77528
124200
162878
86134
36999
109593
207265
70396
133981
118369
40364
79848
40385
97124
101090
126036
232098
97144
82259
14714
118470
Inertia
Lbs
3500
3500
3500
3000
3500
4000
3500
4000
3500
4000
4000
4500
2250
2500
3500
4000
3500
2500
3500
4000
3000
3500
2750
4000
4000
4500
3500
Hp(%50mph
11.1
11.4
7.6
5.0
5.1
8.9
10.2
8.9
7.6
11.4
11.6
11.8
6.4
6.9
15.0
7.2
10.5
7.2
10.5
6.9
10.7
7.1
9.6
6.9
15.2
10.0
10.9
HC
gm/mile
0.69
0.43
3.33
0.25
0.61
0.23
1.62
0.23
1.39
16.18
4.28
0.19
1.08
1.61
1.50
0.39
1.11
0.38
1.05
1.10
0.96
0.19
0.67
0.97
1.46
0.06
0.22
NOx
gm/mile
1.31
1.85
1.16
0.77
0.89
0.92
1.82
0.78
2.59
2.14
2.04
0.83
1.23
0.85
1.81
0.77
6.99
0.41
7.08
1.03
2.87
0.85
3.12
1.02
1.64
0.03
1.20
CO
gm/mile
16.85
8.80
99.70
7.56
5.95
3.34
17.68
3.54
15.30
212.80
59.50
3.18
10.66
31.43
58.74
5.40
12.85
4.00
12.37
25.17
46.03
3.01
3.14
25.02
21.02
0.51
4.63
CO2
gm/mile
491.60
470.54
393.33
367.51
447.10
525.91
361.70
500.24
443.27
518.00
492.55
577.33
269.45
400.69
423.59
495.16
512.47
353.76
509.20
573.71
422.81
473.81
386.87
558.72
547.12
464.40
376.85
Fuel Economy
mpg
16.55
17.72
15.36
22.64
18.78
16.19
21.82
16.99
18.25
9.54
14.37
14.77
29.73
18.92
16.54
17.05
16.06
23.83
16.18
13.96
17.28
17.97
21.85
14.32
14.72
18.50
22.37
-------
RUN#
84495
84497
84498
84499
84500
84502
84503
84504
84505
84508
84509
84510
84512
84514
84515
84517
84518
84519
84520
84521
84522
84524
84526
84527
84528
84529
84531
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1996 CMC Sonoma PU
1995 Toy ota 4 Runner
2001 Toy ota Sienna
1995 Acura Integra
1998 Nissan Frontier PU
1996 Chrysler Concorde
2002 Ford Taurus
2000 Chrysler Concorde
1993 Dodge Intrepid
1992 Honda Civic
1992 Chevrolet Astrovan
1994 Chevrolet Suburban
1982 Chevrolet Caprice
2002 Chrysler Concorde
1999 Dodge Stratus
1998 Dodge Caravan
1994 Buick Skylark
1992 Dodge Caravan
2001 Ford Taurus
1997 Honda Accord
1996 Chevrolet 1500 PU
1995IsuzuPU
1991 Lincoln Towncar
1995 Dodge Ram 1500 PU
1994 Mercury Grand Marquis
1993 Plymouth Sundance
1992 Geo Tracker
Odometer
Miles
51863
85898
59734
80579
112521
111502
26406
65330
210298
124705
217165
187410
88587
34231
108838
80989
200811
213493
47479
101888
46711
87225
188033
93425
130521
84652
48704
Inertia
Lbs
3000
4000
4000
2750
3500
3500
4000
3000
3500
2250
4000
5500
4000
3500
3000
4000
3000
3500
3500
3000
4000
3000
4000
4000
4000
2750
2750
Hp(%50mph
9.2
12.9
10.0
7.2
11.0
7.7
8.0
11.3
6.8
4.6
12.5
10.8
4.6
7.8
5.5
7.9
5.4
8.0
6.8
4.9
12.2
12.0
7.1
15.0
10.7
6.3
14.5
HC
gm/mile
0.32
0.37
0.28
0.47
0.53
0.45
0.11
0.38
0.62
0.47
2.13
2.75
18.05
0.22
0.33
0.40
0.58
1.13
0.13
0.25
0.29
0.41
0.79
0.66
0.61
1.10
0.73
NOx
gm/mile
0.52
0.56
0.42
0.32
1.90
0.49
0.20
0.38
1.70
0.59
3.50
3.76
0.70
0.21
0.71
0.66
0.75
3.20
0.18
0.49
0.41
1.27
1.20
0.55
1.59
1.47
1.72
CO
gm/mile
5.61
7.47
3.33
8.94
6.10
3.86
0.77
2.82
6.65
11.66
17.45
31.84
180.26
1.30
8.40
3.62
9.26
11.23
1.07
5.06
2.89
6.62
9.29
10.27
8.85
20.93
22.10
CO2
gm/mile
364.50
568.66
472.34
349.67
411.04
529.94
478.12
436.22
441.11
274.72
518.77
628.93
376.77
472.65
405.03
513.63
437.18
467.29
475.69
406.63
506.94
352.20
508.24
654.32
528.16
387.47
353.40
Fuel Economy
mpg
23.00
14.80
17.99
23.57
20.39
16.02
17.95
19.48
18.98
29.23
15.57
12.52
12.03
18.11
20.53
16.54
18.98
17.62
18.02
20.72
16.80
23.66
16.39
12.80
15.83
20.31
22.05
-------
RUN#
84532
84533
84534
84537
84538
84539
84541
84542
84543
84546
84547
84548
84550
84551
84552
84554
84556
84557
84558
84562
84563
84564
84566
84567
84568
84569
84570
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2003 Pontiac Montana
1999 Chevrolet Suburban
1993 Subaru Legacy
2000 Jeep Cherokee
1998 Ford Ranger PU
1996 Chevrolet Tahoe
1996 Dodge Caravan
1996 Dodge Caravan
2000 Jeep Cherokee
1999 Dodge Dakota PU
1995 Toy ota Corolla
1995 Dodge Intrepid
1988 Lincoln Continental
2002 Isuzu Axiom
2002 Oldsmobile Silouette
1992 Ford F50PU
2001 Chrysler Town & Country
2000 Buick Park Avenue
2001 Chevrolet S-10 PU
2004 Dodge Dakota PU
2003 Ford Ranger 4X4 PU
1998 Dodge Caravan
1995 Honda Odyssey
1992 Cadillac Sedan De-Ville
1999 Ford Ranger PU
1995 Ford Taurus
1994 Chevrolet S 10 PU
Odometer
Miles
49337
88900
114227
88513
48208
69010
161280
161308
88541
64155
103068
138989
31667
46363
61168
134791
75545
67099
106236
8627
18757
127230
109044
155895
126851
203067
63902
Inertia
Lbs
4500
5000
3500
3500
3500
4500
4000
4000
3500
3500
2750
3500
4000
4000
4000
4500
4500
4000
4000
4000
3500
4000
3500
4000
3500
3500
3000
Hp(%50mph
10.1
12.5
9.0
12.5
11.7
12.5
7.2
7.2
12.5
9.6
6.0
5.9
8.3
13.4
9.2
14.6
8.4
6.6
9.8
12.6
11.5
7.9
9.8
6.9
9.0
5.4
9.8
HC
gm/mile
0.21
0.31
0.58
0.30
0.14
0.61
0.70
0.75
0.24
0.37
0.39
0.47
2.50
0.25
0.17
0.67
0.27
0.21
0.65
0.10
0.17
0.27
0.51
12.49
0.62
0.30
0.33
NOx
gm/mile
0.26
1.08
0.71
0.74
1.11
0.76
1.06
1.09
0.76
0.72
0.42
0.63
2.08
0.24
0.20
1.45
0.84
0.34
0.37
0.10
0.14
0.68
0.50
0.40
1.40
0.89
0.49
CO
gm/mile
3.84
4.23
5.24
4.49
2.79
7.53
13.63
14.93
4.07
5.54
3.77
3.77
17.54
4.16
3.27
9.33
4.15
2.07
5.84
0.78
1.88
3.47
8.00
247.44
9.17
6.38
9.14
CO2
gm/mile
509.28
673.62
414.02
535.46
512.19
592.89
469.33
481.07
536.32
503.25
306.40
429.21
527.39
523.63
485.60
613.82
495.20
504.83
549.97
505.30
528.98
485.11
468.35
402.09
393.04
431.84
394.01
Fuel Economy
mpg
16.68
12.64
20.30
15.84
16.65
14.19
17.46
16.98
15.84
16.78
27.46
19.72
15.30
16.21
17.52
13.65
17.13
16.92
15.34
16.98
16.17
17.52
17.84
10.38
21.03
19.44
21.03
-------
RUN#
84572
84573
84574
84575
84577
84580
84581
84582
84584
84585
84587
84588
84589
84591
84592
84593
84595
84596
84597
84599
84600
84601
84603
84605
84608
84609
84611
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1994 Mercury Topaz
1993 Buick Park Avenue
1993 Ford Taurus
1994 Chevrolet Lumina
1998 Ford Aerostar
2002 Chrysler Town & Country
1995 Chevrolet Corsica
1988 BMW 528e
1995 Nissan PU
1993 Ford Escort SW
1996 Mercury Villager
1978 Buick Regal
2001 Saturn
1993 Toyota 4Runner
1979 Ford LTD
1998 Honda Accord
1988 Ford Escort
1997 Ford Taurus
1994 Pontiac Sunbird
1998 Toy ota Avalon
1993 Ford Explorer
1979 Buick Regal
1979 Nissan Datsun 210 Wagon
1977 Nissan 280Z
1996 Nissan Quest
1978 Buick Regal
1989 Toyota Camry
Odometer
Miles
41482
74444
39476
126825
0
84580
78767
287806
86705
99988
166799
81379
56662
178462
65850
75067
133085
97601
145869
29575
47980
5864
47114
94782
125651
64571
168091
Inertia
Lbs
2750
4000
3500
3500
4000
4500
3000
3500
3500
2750
4000
4000
2750
4000
4000
3000
2750
3500
2750
3500
4000
3500
2500
3000
4000
3500
3500
Hp(%50mph
7.0
6.1
5.5
5.4
7.9
11.1
5.9
10.7
12.0
6.6
7.9
9.9
6.1
12.9
10.7
4.0
6.0
6.7
5.2
5.8
10.2
11.8
9.8
9.9
10.0
10.8
8.4
HC
gm/mile
0.42
0.22
0.35
0.89
0.22
0.19
0.40
2.08
0.31
0.15
0.64
1.79
0.14
0.36
5.77
0.13
0.15
0.22
0.87
0.57
0.42
4.54
2.85
1.70
0.44
3.64
0.43
NOx
gm/mile
1.10
1.01
0.89
1.54
1.67
0.61
0.78
1.37
0.32
1.83
1.12
1.54
0.17
1.64
1.90
0.16
1.14
0.80
0.46
0.28
1.25
2.81
3.36
2.59
0.35
2.94
1.54
CO
gm/mile
8.04
3.09
7.84
18.57
7.19
3.16
6.26
24.52
4.68
3.98
4.87
44.64
1.49
7.15
76.23
3.31
4.17
5.50
17.65
3.29
8.53
61.35
13.43
16.29
4.98
45.12
6.12
CO2
gm/mile
409.75
521.44
417.99
441.69
505.33
513.29
415.79
378.95
392.23
324.07
488.31
637.58
306.50
552.38
346.40
370.68
340.49
463.01
355.20
429.75
573.83
481.09
311.23
501.77
464.19
490.61
448.77
Fuel Economy
mpg
20.32
16.34
19.95
18.17
16.64
16.59
20.17
20.31
21.49
26.02
17.29
12.07
27.83
15.24
17.79
22.88
24.77
18.22
22.32
19.71
14.63
14.55
25.24
16.16
18.18
15.03
18.72
-------
RUN#
84612
84613
84614
84616
84617
84618
84620
84621
84622
84623
84626
84627
84628
84629
84630
84632
84633
84634
84635
84637
84638
84639
84640
84642
84643
84644
84645
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2000 Ford Ranger PU
1990 Oldsmobile Delta 88
1978 Oldsmobile Delta 88
1999 Plymouth Voyager
1997 Chevrolet Suburban
1992 Plymouth Voyager
1992 Ford Ranger PU
1992 Ford Ranger PU
1999 Toyota Camry
1989 Plymouth Acclaim
! 987 Dodge D 100 PU
1987FordF150PU
2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer
1996AcuraTL2.5
1989 Honda Accord
1987FordF150PU
1987 Volvo 740 Turbo
1988 Plymouth Voyager
1989 Ford Crown Vic
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
1996 Chrysler Town & Country
1995 Cheverolet Cavalier
1994 Ford Explorer
1989 Dodge Spirit
1987 Ford Escort
2001 Nissan Pathfinder
1993 Volvo 960
Odometer
Miles
33680
185694
73729
113389
145147
154297
19758
13586
64134
164203
23200
410
77758
117642
139963
428
248178
162874
62847
79420
213656
140500
98974
139488
12845
66284
197094
Inertia
Lbs
3500
3500
4000
4000
5500
4000
3500
3500
3500
3000
3500
4000
4500
3500
2750
4000
3000
4000
3500
3500
4000
2750
4000
3000
2500
4000
3500
Hp(%50mph
12.0
6.8
8.7
7.2
11.2
7.5
11.3
11.1
6.4
6.9
13.2
10.4
10.0
8.1
6.0
13.9
9.9
7.8
11.0
10.5
8.5
4.8
10.6
8.4
7.4
15.3
10.3
HC
gm/mile
0.14
3.12
4.10
0.15
0.34
0.66
2.76
0.51
0.47
0.82
1.20
14.92
0.41
0.40
1.14
15.24
1.29
1.06
1.51
3.79
1.30
0.32
0.26
0.54
1.82
0.21
0.48
NOx
gm/mile
0.55
1.14
2.29
0.25
1.08
4.05
3.11
1.15
0.43
3.44
1.70
3.78
0.31
0.17
0.51
3.70
1.23
3.16
1.54
3.91
1.35
0.75
1.33
1.50
2.64
0.36
0.48
CO
gm/mile
2.09
12.82
45.07
0.99
4.94
19.71
21.51
7.47
4.09
18.47
36.39
69.16
4.76
6.73
29.39
88.78
59.49
11.64
16.40
69.56
22.88
5.40
7.94
19.26
29.84
3.18
4.84
CO2
gm/mile
490.19
528.23
551.99
468.89
620.41
449.67
418.54
453.47
397.33
358.92
431.72
552.85
585.30
422.92
372.77
574.24
394.30
465.97
471.33
467.34
473.64
328.84
529.41
395.15
342.81
530.67
439.84
Fuel Economy
mpg
17.43
15.43
13.55
18.28
13.68
17.83
18.68
18.44
21.24
22.05
17.47
12.17
14.49
19.80
20.38
11.32
17.50
17.66
17.16
14.63
16.76
25.44
15.86
20.16
21.78
16.05
19.17
-------
RUN#
84646
84648
84649
84650
84653
84655
84656
84658
84659
84660
84661
84662
84663
84665
84666
84667
84668
84669
84670
84672
84673
84674
84675
84676
84677
84679
84680
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1988 Honda Accord
1987 Dodge Dakota PU
1995 CMC Sonoma PU
1990 Chevrolet Lumina APV
1977 Chevrolet C-20 PU
1990 Buick Electra Park Avenue
1990 Chevrolet Lumina APV
1989 Chevrolet Astrovan
1988 Chrysler Le Baron
1988 Dodge Caravan
1990 Buick Century
1990 Cadillac Eldorado
1989 Chevrolet Corsica
1989 Toy ota 4X4 PU
1988 Ford F150PU
1982 Ford F250 PU
1991 Oldsmobile Delta 88
1990 Dodge Spirit
1989 Mercury Topaz
1983 Toyota Tercel
1983 CMC Vandura
1979 Pontiac Firebird
1993 Ford Tempo
1990 Ford Bronco
1988 Buick Park Avenue
1983 Toy ota PU
1973 Chevrolet PU
Odometer
Miles
209194
112838
56578
136313
37697
169860
123632
215908
117003
61439
148959
185384
98999
262316
14075
85513
139412
109931
6137
87900
52728
45370
25053
25202
146833
97635
57484
Inertia
Lbs
2750
3500
3500
3500
4000
3500
3500
3500
3000
3500
3000
3500
3000
3500
4000
3500
3500
3000
2750
2250
4500
4000
2750
4500
3500
3000
4000
Hp(%50mph
6.4
10.6
9.8
8.1
13.9
6.3
8.1
12.0
8.3
8.0
6.8
6.2
5.3
10.9
14.6
11.9
7.0
8.7
6.6
6.7
16.2
10.8
6.1
13.3
6.3
9.9
12.6
HC
gm/mile
0.70
1.10
0.73
0.60
3.91
0.39
0.43
0.87
1.74
1.27
0.29
2.18
0.92
0.58
1.07
6.90
0.17
1.03
0.70
0.41
6.61
2.49
0.34
0.89
0.27
1.20
16.97
NOx
gm/mile
1.41
1.73
0.71
1.55
5.20
1.28
1.32
2.86
2.73
3.01
1.34
5.03
1.60
2.80
2.91
3.31
1.37
2.71
1.25
0.91
0.65
2.71
2.00
2.31
0.61
1.37
2.37
CO
gm/mile
15.78
22.31
7.08
11.29
71.68
4.83
8.00
11.21
31.37
7.11
3.69
41.55
12.66
12.08
12.56
65.84
1.94
20.44
14.16
5.95
216.76
42.62
4.90
17.66
4.17
14.49
112.12
CO2
gm/mile
370.72
518.99
465.34
457.83
699.01
473.98
428.15
382.92
422.16
459.86
430.31
522.94
377.50
508.23
603.30
608.67
461.19
398.80
389.90
267.15
680.41
503.43
397.57
516.46
450.50
343.11
533.55
Fuel Economy
mpg
21.65
15.44
17.98
18.03
10.45
17.83
19.47
21.35
18.05
18.12
19.70
14.47
21.51
16.27
13.74
11.74
18.52
19.83
20.78
30.99
8.27
14.89
21.19
15.74
18.80
23.29
11.30
-------
RUN#
84681
84682
84683
84685
84686
84687
84688
84689
84690
84692
84693
84694
84695
84696
84699
84700
84701
84702
84703
84705
84707
84708
84709
84710
84712
84713
84714
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1993 Ford Tempo
1990 Toyota Camry
1990 Ford Ranger PU
1988 Ford F150PU
1986 Ford F150PU
1976 Chevrolet El Camino
1993 Ford Taurus
1992 CMC Jimmy
1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cierra
1988 Buick Century
1988 Ford F150PU
1983 Chevrolet CIO PU
1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera
1987 Toy ota PU
1985 Chevrolet Caprice
1978 Ford PU
1990FordF150PU
1989 Chevrolet G20 Van
1987 Chevrolet Blazer
1980 Chevrolet Malibu
1973 Chevrolet Impala
2003 Dodge Caravan
1989 Ford Ranger PU
1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
1979 Chevrolet Nova
1996 Chevrolet Blazer
1994 Saturn SW
Odometer
Miles
25073
138235
72976
62947
94737
61809
92978
90871
220970
94555
97172
98799
220989
169293
58223
73447
38803
27435
153398
31253
94178
10200
28864
68810
86117
94350
132333
Inertia
Lbs
2750
3500
3500
4000
3500
4000
3500
3500
3000
3000
4000
3500
3000
2750
3500
4000
4000
4000
3500
3500
4000
4000
3000
3500
3500
4000
2500
Hp(%50mph
6.1
9.0
11.1
13.5
12.5
12.1
9.5
9.5
5.4
6.4
14.6
14.0
5.4
9.6
8.7
11.7
13.5
16.2
9.8
9.5
11.4
7.2
11.1
10.6
9.6
10.7
6.1
HC
gm/mile
0.31
2.40
1.04
1.21
3.26
1.90
0.41
0.26
0.68
7.65
1.01
1.92
0.63
3.74
5.20
6.12
0.50
1.27
1.10
2.26
2.75
0.10
1.12
1.30
6.38
0.36
0.34
NOx
gm/mile
2.10
0.90
2.87
1.92
3.92
1.60
1.29
0.67
1.27
0.26
1.92
4.45
1.21
3.61
2.49
3.40
2.22
1.69
5.35
0.79
2.13
0.52
1.33
0.66
2.10
0.61
0.27
CO
gm/mile
4.10
46.46
12.93
5.52
18.29
44.19
6.49
6.79
9.34
159.81
15.65
20.78
7.41
25.34
62.01
65.73
3.40
12.63
26.50
75.66
38.88
1.11
18.08
21.38
75.98
6.19
5.26
CO2
gm/mile
402.94
437.65
405.99
608.22
441.90
626.96
460.94
309.46
380.07
285.99
545.57
495.45
392.20
392.74
516.95
616.47
395.97
590.26
508.48
488.70
676.81
462.54
366.95
414.02
398.81
510.93
303.24
Fuel Economy
mpg
20.98
16.62
20.04
13.87
17.91
12.26
18.22
26.82
21.69
15.35
15.02
16.12
21.21
19.38
13.66
11.65
21.37
14.02
15.55
14.01
11.53
18.53
21.58
19.06
16.01
16.50
27.54
10
-------
RUN#
84715
84719
84720
84722
84723
84724
84726
84727
84728
84729
84730
84732
84733
84734
84735
84737
84738
84739
84740
84743
84745
84748
84749
84751
84752
84753
84754
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1988 Mazda B2200PU
1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
1989 Chevrolet 1500 PU
1998 Ford Windstar
1991 Chevrolet Cavalier
1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera
1990 Ford Aerostar
1982 Ford Grenada
2002 Ford Escape 2wd
2001 ToyotaCamry
1995 Chevrolet S 10 PU
1979 Jeep CJ76
1998 Buick Skylark
1993 Plymouth Voyager
1988 Honda Accord
1984 Chevrolet Celebrity
1976 Pontiac Gran Prix
1998 Mazda Protege
1990 Buick Lesabre
1999 Mazda Protege
1990 Honda Civic
2002 Dodge Caravan
2001 Toyota Sienna
1998 Ford Escort
1978 Ford F100PU
2003 Dodge Caravan
2003 Chrysler Town & Country
Odometer
Miles
220307
85449
140678
99476
182349
171475
19648
64654
36209
46869
75640
8518
65464
166916
209393
64091
60909
88569
107876
122968
133966
60790
80227
55309
58917
47649
20787
Inertia
Lbs
3000
3500
4000
4000
2750
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3000
3500
4000
2750
3000
4500
2750
3500
2750
2250
4500
4000
2750
3500
4500
4500
Hp(%50mph
10.6
4.5
12.8
7.9
5.8
5.4
10.3
10.6
7.5
6.7
9.8
10.6
5.9
7.3
6.4
6.7
10.7
6.8
6.8
6.9
4.6
9.3
9.4
6.0
12.2
7.9
8.9
HC
gm/mile
2.09
0.32
1.82
0.18
1.95
0.53
0.60
0.77
0.14
0.18
1.04
3.76
0.25
0.59
0.52
0.26
4.63
0.53
0.57
0.20
0.66
0.10
0.13
0.16
0.45
0.13
0.08
NOx
gm/mile
1. 11
1.13
2.99
1.46
3.72
1.51
1.42
1.15
0.14
0.29
0.58
4.62
0.64
1.61
0.94
0.90
2.19
0.78
0.86
1.09
1.98
0.75
0.25
1.31
1.52
0.20
0.34
CO
gm/mile
38.05
6.95
17.69
2.16
14.57
6.44
15.86
14.22
0.67
2.88
9.79
69.57
2.20
7.89
12.21
10.68
145.70
7.78
8.18
5.42
12.64
1.86
1.66
5.98
2.59
1.05
0.51
CO2
gm/mile
362.78
436.29
618.05
500.17
355.49
410.41
455.19
515.33
445.87
389.04
481.29
443.55
451.62
459.29
338.33
379.58
617.79
352.39
491.03
296.15
278.81
492.12
430.95
333.06
247.09
487.95
483.28
Fuel Economy
mpg
20.07
19.21
13.21
17.08
22.39
20.39
17.86
15.94
19.24
21.84
17.22
15.25
18.88
18.18
23.97
21.67
10.00
23.50
17.02
28.20
28.63
17.38
19.84
25.10
34.09
17.57
17.77
11
-------
RUN#
84755
84757
84758
84759
84760
84761
84763
84765
84766
84767
84768
84770
84771
84772
84773
84774
84775
84777
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2002 Honda Odyssey
2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1979 Chevrolet CIO Beauville
2005 Ford Focus
2004 Ford Escape
2004 Kia Sedona
2003 Honda Odyssey
1985 Chevrolet Impala
2000 Dodge Caravan
1998 Nissan Frontier PU
1995 Ford F150PU
1995 Ford F250 PU
1994 Chevrolet Astrovan
1992 Dodge Caravan
1998 Toyota 4Runner
1995 Dodge Caravan
1997 Chevrolet Suburban
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Odometer
Miles
60753
90011
84025
6701
10519
16609
44752
75914
93162
107615
147342
52586
133318
143971
115768
136837
137630
87020
Inertia
Lbs
4500
4000
4000
3000
3500
5000
4500
4000
4000
3500
4500
4500
4000
4000
4000
4000
5000
3500
Hp(%50mph
12.7
11.7
14.6
11.7
10.4
10.7
12.4
11.1
10.0
11.0
11.6
11.6
12.3
7.0
11.7
7.6
10.8
9.6
HC
gm/mile
0.10
0.19
3.20
0.06
0.10
0.09
0.13
4.28
0.14
0.36
0.70
0.56
3.06
0.49
0.18
0.38
1.19
0.88
NOx
gm/mile
0.13
0.46
1.54
0.03
0.06
0.07
0.14
1.53
0.35
2.11
1.38
2.28
2.93
2.51
0.59
0.29
2.59
3.48
CO
gm/mile
2.40
1.52
53.92
1.02
1.04
1.05
1.75
103.88
1.49
9.87
3.20
5.70
22.62
6.82
1.66
3.57
12.19
15.65
CO2
gm/mile
504.12
499.68
628.05
359.02
456.46
532.36
514.21
468.18
490.98
411.01
580.36
609.75
469.66
472.29
479.71
456.49
619.22
464.68
Fuel Economy
mpg
16.94
17.12
11.91
23.86
18.78
16.11
16.64
13.35
17.43
20.13
14.65
13.87
16.73
17.77
17.83
18.58
13.41
17.50
12
-------
Correlation Testing Data
13
-------
Comparison of SEMTECH and Dyno Emission Measurement
RunID
84393
84393
84393
84393
84394
84394
84394
84394
84396
84396
84396
84396
84397
84397
84397
84397
84398
84398
84398
84398
84399
84399
84399
84399
84401
84401
84401
84401
84402
84402
84402
84402
84403
84403
84403
84403
84407
84407
84407
84407
84409
84409
84409
84409
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
8.39
0.16
0.05
0.58
7.56
0.14
0.08
0.51
2.58
0.13
0.28
0.27
22.00
7.18
16.12
8.56
5.36
0.11
0.03
0.38
5.72
0.17
0.12
0.46
7.99
0.17
0.43
0.59
8.58
0.66
1.46
1.12
24.43
0.67
0.75
1.90
6.20
0.86
2.62
1.27
10.13
0.08
0.17
0.61
BKI
5.08
0.08
0.04
0.34
4.70
0.07
0.06
0.31
3.19
0.12
0.29
0.30
13.23
4.16
8.78
4.94
3.09
0.04
0.02
0.20
3.18
0.09
0.07
0.25
4.89
0.08
0.22
0.34
9.52
0.52
1.12
1.02
9.71
0.11
0.20
0.60
10.65
2.39
3.28
2.90
8.67
0.04
0.14
0.50
CO (g/m)
SMT
70.31
2.41
4.14
6.07
109.27
4.39
7.65
9.95
25.08
8.77
7.99
9.56
259.15
110.79
191.20
123.99
50.55
2.90
1.32
5.30
119.68
6.50
4.58
12.26
81.22
3.87
8.54
8.18
134.24
14.09
23.71
20.92
145.12
1.60
6.03
9.31
200.41
24.45
96.83
39.00
138.04
0.42
3.00
7.85
BKI
39.51
1.16
1.38
3.17
60.26
2.26
2.92
5.26
28.29
7.68
6.78
8.69
128.75
68.33
98.88
73.51
30.49
1.67
0.52
3.11
63.02
3.71
2.03
6.68
46.87
2.17
3.62
4.57
126.29
11.17
15.15
17.36
83.62
0.87
2.27
5.20
107.28
18.66
29.52
24.18
152.82
0.28
2.42
8.41
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.06
0.21
0.49
0.33
1.60
0.37
0.87
0.47
3.26
1.21
1.48
1.34
4.93
4.29
3.67
4.28
2.79
0.13
0.11
0.27
2.21
0.40
0.34
0.49
4.68
1.20
1.30
1.39
2.91
2.78
3.62
2.85
2.41
0.32
0.65
0.45
7.86
4.86
7.34
5.20
1.54
0.94
0.38
0.94
BKI
1.82
0.20
0.35
0.30
0.92
0.26
0.37
0.30
3.73
1.24
1.43
1.38
4.10
3.58
2.61
3.54
1.32
0.09
0.10
0.16
1.29
0.24
0.17
0.29
3.32
0.83
0.82
0.95
3.01
2.55
3.11
2.61
1.75
0.24
0.45
0.33
6.29
4.43
5.17
4.58
1.89
1.15
0.45
1.15
C02 (g/m)
SMT
1252.15
712.89
1105.15
768.10
1461.93
789.95
1251.15
855.25
628.00
351.21
442.74
371.92
1342.98
758.59
1048.35
808.69
1431.06
650.29
1032.81
717.85
1264.16
654.58
1150.17
720.62
1419.41
754.66
1083.24
811.75
576.75
357.68
510.69
379.47
1403.08
725.19
1140.85
789.19
1091.31
486.30
1026.90
557.01
741.33
406.54
575.88
434.76
BKI
758.15
420.63
584.45
449.54
851.64
499.45
686.66
530.00
656.60
364.62
451.71
385.82
860.53
539.03
597.34
559.58
736.07
374.39
508.72
402.69
668.49
376.77
488.81
399.66
823.17
466.99
606.75
495.01
516.09
322.40
402.65
337.87
800.46
443.30
623.90
474.11
616.01
345.51
458.48
367.97
724.76
407.18
547.19
432.62
PM2.5
(mg/m)
22.65
1.20
3.60
2.48
79.98
18.82
6.30
21.09
59.23
8.26
2.23
10.49
212.62
71.50
95.84
80.42
34.25
3.69
5.52
5.41
8.85
2.50
2.42
2.82
36.31
3.05
3.01
4.75
179.94
12.28
3.99
20.31
97.40
2.48
5.11
7.52
469.83
137.09
85.61
151.32
27.69
3.25
3.41
4.54
Distance
(miles)
1.19
8.65
1.19
11.04
1.14
8.47
1.14
10.74
1.19
8.63
1.19
11.01
1.21
8.86
1.19
11.26
1.20
8.65
1.20
11.05
1.19
8.66
1.19
11.05
1.17
8.63
1.20
11.00
1.17
8.62
1.18
10.98
1.19
8.79
1.22
11.20
1.25
8.76
1.23
11.25
1.21
8.69
1.08
10.98
14
-------
RunID
84411
84411
84411
84411
84412
84412
84412
84412
84413
84413
84413
84413
84414
84414
84414
84414
84415
84415
84415
84415
84416
84416
84416
84416
84419
84419
84419
84419
84420
84420
84420
84420
84421
84421
84421
84421
84422
84422
84422
84422
84424
84424
84424
84424
84425
84425
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
8.62
0.09
0.00
0.52
3.06
0.14
0.00
0.28
1.99
1.35
1.71
0.01
0.00
0.09
3.92
0.06
0.33
0.29
1.66
0.11
0.07
0.19
5.70
0.14
0.31
0.44
2.54
0.06
0.06
0.19
3.12
0.06
0.26
0.23
5.56
1.33
3.26
1.69
2.56
0.11
0.56
0.27
10.67
1.82
BKI
7.88
0.15
0.14
0.53
6.07
0.25
0.42
0.56
13.86
1.16
1.85
1.87
1.94
0.02
0.01
0.12
4.65
0.07
0.32
0.33
1.84
0.11
0.06
0.19
6.03
0.12
0.26
0.44
3.72
0.06
0.05
0.25
3.60
0.05
0.15
0.24
5.23
1.18
2.70
1.50
2.43
0.09
0.51
0.24
8.97
1.73
CO (g/m)
SMT
43.71
0.22
0.17
2.42
81.68
2.75
0.19
6.64
23.60
26.86
26.14
0.14
0.07
1.48
86.43
2.92
6.24
7.68
27.24
6.45
5.24
7.44
98.88
1.46
2.63
6.61
35.21
3.69
4.11
5.40
30.09
0.74
3.57
2.45
54.79
16.63
23.22
19.07
24.78
2.79
13.71
4.69
90.61
14.08
BKI
39.69
3.83
0.84
5.39
77.85
5.82
6.63
9.57
278.20
21.00
11.77
33.86
28.85
0.10
0.04
1.59
103.96
2.49
4.90
8.11
27.28
5.64
4.04
6.63
104.30
1.45
1.79
6.88
43.96
3.02
2.30
5.15
31.69
0.56
2.09
2.28
47.44
14.88
18.99
16.83
20.77
2.54
10.28
4.02
67.56
12.73
NOx (g/m)
SMT
3.42
0.41
0.00
0.54
1.14
0.17
0.00
0.21
0.87
1.45
0.74
0.16
0.22
0.20
3.27
1.41
0.77
1.47
0.34
0.09
0.10
0.10
3.21
0.45
0.44
0.60
1.37
0.35
0.19
0.39
1.69
0.36
0.46
0.43
7.56
5.57
6.61
5.74
5.44
2.22
2.88
2.43
8.02
5.91
BKI
4.23
0.68
0.43
0.84
1.27
0.42
0.52
0.47
1.04
1.35
2.38
1.40
0.55
0.08
0.11
0.11
3.31
1.57
0.88
1.62
0.32
0.07
0.07
0.08
2.77
0.39
0.40
0.52
1.39
0.31
0.15
0.35
1.63
0.34
0.40
0.41
6.94
5.10
5.81
5.25
5.37
2.16
2.83
2.37
7.17
5.33
C02 (g/m)
SMT
742.03
145.26
4.92
166.12
489.68
166.36
3.97
171.91
624.26
635.34
891.37
415.96
580.10
452.20
1186.71
650.24
897.32
696.66
501.60
304.03
401.72
321.06
767.50
442.53
608.24
470.93
829.11
433.93
643.20
469.59
687.08
365.98
544.39
394.82
866.21
516.94
689.25
547.06
1111.12
555.81
745.28
597.83
1052.84
532.29
BKI
732.21
360.76
434.97
384.08
441.33
292.74
375.46
305.99
1168.74
665.04
799.21
700.36
865.17
415.58
570.85
449.79
1169.20
672.41
878.95
713.39
475.00
265.67
342.44
281.73
722.94
417.81
540.17
442.39
652.32
356.70
459.99
379.66
644.40
340.05
446.63
363.08
785.14
499.61
613.66
522.20
1009.46
546.49
674.49
579.49
841.12
505.45
PM2.5
(mg/m)
206.29
81.48
18.29
83.29
0.69
2.96
6.58
3.09
66.63
154.58
18.28
140.91
12.46
1.90
3.53
2.56
25.18
28.77
6.40
27.03
8.69
3.42
5.59
3.84
19.09
3.34
5.03
4.29
80.85
13.85
8.57
17.05
36.56
2.42
2.80
4.21
8.44
19.90
10.81
18.68
5.45
14.81
8.85
13.91
90.72
26.26
Distance
(miles)
1.11
8.63
1.17
10.91
1.17
8.61
1.17
10.95
1.22
8.83
1.17
11.22
1.20
8.74
1.23
11.17
1.25
8.76
1.21
11.22
1.17
8.67
1.21
11.04
1.22
8.73
1.22
11.17
1.24
8.76
1.22
11.22
1.19
8.68
1.17
11.04
1.18
8.76
1.22
11.16
1.20
8.67
1.17
11.05
1.25
8.72
15
-------
RunID
84425
84425
84426
84426
84426
84426
84427
84427
84427
84427
84428
84428
84428
84428
84430
84430
84430
84430
84431
84431
84431
84431
84432
84432
84432
84432
84433
84433
84433
84433
84436
84436
84436
84436
84437
84437
84437
84437
84438
84438
84438
84438
84439
84439
84439
84439
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HCO
SMT
3.39
2.40
1.79
0.12
0.09
0.20
1.57
0.01
0.02
0.10
5.56
0.05
0.13
0.35
6.66
0.45
0.88
0.80
5.23
0.49
0.65
0.86
5.62
0.11
0.15
0.41
3.30
0.12
0.26
0.30
4.91
0.10
0.53
0.38
4.14
0.05
0.10
0.27
1.69
0.02
0.02
0.11
3.20
0.17
0.67
0.37
?/m)
BKI
3.03
2.21
2.05
0.13
0.07
0.22
1.74
0.02
0.02
0.11
6.30
0.05
0.14
0.38
6.58
0.29
0.58
0.63
10.05
0.65
0.85
1.15
5.87
0.10
0.15
0.41
2.85
0.12
0.24
0.28
4.58
0.10
0.54
0.36
4.64
0.05
0.11
0.30
1.75
0.02
0.02
0.11
3.57
0.18
0.66
0.39
CO
SMT
20.95
18.67
18.01
6.40
1.74
6.68
13.78
0.19
0.34
0.92
90.13
0.74
2.00
5.61
167.39
12.60
18.57
20.97
76.54
4.75
2.08
10.00
34.13
1.30
1.51
3.05
38.34
2.96
1.21
4.68
100.57
4.44
12.10
10.11
42.43
0.38
0.65
2.61
36.28
0.20
0.15
2.10
34.07
4.38
5.80
6.03
(g/m)
BKI
17.23
16.01
18.67
6.19
1.05
6.48
14.48
0.09
0.17
0.86
91.99
0.65
1.70
5.57
154.86
8.37
11.60
16.13
104.50
8.05
2.11
12.64
35.67
1.07
1.00
2.91
29.46
2.27
0.60
3.58
87.09
4.43
11.41
9.28
45.08
0.22
0.26
2.58
38.12
0.10
0.01
2.13
34.83
3.99
4.82
5.65
NOx
SMT
6.46
6.07
0.54
0.09
0.08
0.11
1.11
0.08
0.13
0.14
2.30
0.72
0.66
0.80
.99
.78
.59
.78
.95
.20
.17
.25
2.09
0.20
0.55
0.32
2.22
0.22
0.69
0.35
3.33
0.58
1.16
0.77
2.83
0.20
0.28
0.35
1.46
0.05
0.12
0.13
4.39
1.59
1.25
1.71
(g/m)
BKI
5.87
5.47
0.49
0.07
0.07
0.10
1.09
0.07
0.12
0.13
2.09
0.64
0.56
0.71
1.98
1.74
1.55
1.74
2.60
1.29
1.29
1.36
2.18
0.16
0.39
0.29
2.11
0.19
0.64
0.32
3.05
0.48
0.89
0.64
2.93
0.19
0.26
0.34
1.19
0.04
0.07
0.10
4.21
1.53
1.09
1.63
CO2
SMT
740.95
574.97
628.01
319.75
467.95
346.19
648.67
352.97
492.58
378.39
740.90
401.43
538.16
429.14
630.28
426.45
616.71
449.98
631.31
465.89
592.46
487.00
602.80
313.54
442.32
337.72
908.34
503.29
682.23
537.00
930.09
502.46
715.91
540.07
793.87
400.99
538.08
431.28
778.82
439.89
616.41
469.97
879.92
443.14
633.96
479.21
(g/m)
BKI
632.32
532.63
561.74
285.95
370.11
306.34
626.15
331.64
426.21
353.87
691.49
394.45
516.30
418.70
551.50
374.24
473.01
390.15
764.80
483.16
663.60
510.38
550.77
281.24
358.48
300.92
723.69
465.12
581.77
486.68
781.45
464.92
615.16
491.97
773.21
403.06
521.38
430.76
715.24
412.78
557.00
439.08
838.82
431.64
585.69
463.43
PM2.5
(mg/m)
5.93
28.28
27.00
5.68
7.40
6.91
8.49
1.03
1.34
1.45
60.99
15.18
6.58
17.01
66.40
22.18
10.36
23.64
84.07
25.88
4.28
27.39
47.80
4.27
3.71
6.55
11.52
30.18
6.06
27.54
8.93
3.72
1.93
3.87
16.20
1.28
1.53
2.08
5.05
2.56
2.40
2.68
31.68
6.31
1.91
7.32
Distance
(miles)
1.25
11.22
1.21
8.74
1.23
11.19
1.23
8.74
1.22
11.19
1.23
8.73
1.21
11.17
1.17
8.63
1.18
10.98
1.20
8.72
1.22
11.13
1.24
8.76
1.21
11.20
1.21
8.68
1.19
11.07
1.23
8.78
1.20
11.22
1.21
8.72
1.22
11.15
1.24
8.71
1.21
11.16
1.20
8.72
1.20
11.12
16
-------
RunID
84442
84442
84442
84442
84443
84443
84443
84443
84444
84444
84444
84444
84445
84445
84445
84445
84446
84446
84446
84446
84448
84448
84448
84448
84449
84449
84449
84449
84450
84450
84450
84450
84451
84451
84451
84451
84452
84452
84452
84452
84453
84453
84453
84453
84455
84455
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
4.34
0.05
0.11
0.28
4.81
0.32
0.73
0.59
4.03
0.06
0.01
0.27
3.80
0.08
0.00
0.26
9.65
0.30
0.49
0.80
5.90
0.13
0.19
0.44
5.73
0.13
0.29
0.44
12.65
2.70
4.00
3.30
5.23
0.10
0.26
0.38
2.96
0.12
0.32
0.28
4.85
0.19
0.53
0.46
2.77
0.06
BKI
4.84
0.05
0.13
0.30
6.06
0.27
0.68
0.60
5.13
0.04
0.02
0.31
4.29
0.02
0.05
0.24
11.57
0.14
0.48
0.76
6.66
0.09
0.19
0.44
6.63
0.08
0.27
0.44
13.31
2.43
3.61
3.09
5.52
0.10
0.31
0.40
3.07
0.11
0.27
0.27
5.26
0.24
0.57
0.53
3.05
0.06
CO (g/m)
SMT
43.94
0.32
0.55
2.61
48.61
4.32
4.73
6.72
15.16
0.44
0.11
1.21
34.51
0.64
0.22
2.37
73.02
1.22
3.46
5.09
93.92
0.98
2.52
5.98
95.32
2.85
7.02
8.05
138.09
24.05
32.28
30.51
75.65
3.33
6.49
7.35
38.13
5.05
8.07
6.99
24.15
2.33
6.75
3.80
31.59
3.54
BKI
46.57
0.20
0.34
2.62
52.08
4.17
3.15
6.60
16.47
0.36
-0.01
1.19
38.72
0.20
0.27
2.18
77.07
1.10
2.60
5.17
101.45
0.87
1.99
6.21
103.37
2.36
5.49
7.91
126.25
22.00
25.01
27.69
80.77
2.85
5.75
7.10
35.22
4.61
6.19
6.26
24.70
2.65
6.28
4.07
31.60
3.07
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.89
0.24
0.26
0.38
3.02
2.03
3.07
2.15
0.64
0.16
0.14
0.19
1.08
0.06
0.00
0.11
2.13
0.58
1.55
0.73
2.35
0.33
0.45
0.44
3.19
1.03
1.19
1.15
5.32
5.22
7.28
5.37
2.99
1.03
1.30
1.15
3.07
0.92
1.11
1.04
3.77
0.76
1.20
0.95
1.01
0.41
BKI
2.94
0.21
0.24
0.35
2.79
1.83
2.60
1.93
0.65
0.17
0.18
0.20
1.15
0.19
0.20
0.24
2.12
0.48
1.36
0.62
2.07
0.31
0.39
0.41
3.02
1.01
1.22
1.13
5.02
4.68
6.30
4.81
3.27
1.10
1.49
1.24
3.20
0.97
1.17
1.09
3.79
0.90
1.19
1.07
1.00
0.40
C02 (g/m)
SMT
845.02
419.03
561.62
451.12
514.86
330.46
447.61
348.42
753.94
414.49
511.23
439.68
749.39
241.22
24.45
252.55
997.08
496.38
720.06
537.87
883.12
503.30
674.71
535.31
814.13
463.57
627.89
493.77
777.00
423.43
608.39
454.71
777.86
452.31
604.31
480.06
891.29
437.66
599.83
472.58
695.89
353.58
509.50
382.63
806.58
406.08
BKI
848.69
441.75
570.64
471.80
521.76
316.83
380.36
331.88
769.61
425.67
506.19
449.71
755.23
398.93
503.14
424.38
934.34
473.24
654.77
509.89
859.36
492.13
647.09
522.17
787.95
445.89
586.90
473.77
711.39
398.59
537.60
424.96
751.03
435.12
578.39
461.47
861.97
428.62
554.43
459.17
678.96
408.55
506.72
429.73
751.45
399.89
PM2.5
(mg/m)
17.69
1.72
1.45
2.53
77.41
16.61
5.16
19.00
36.18
17.99
5.45
18.07
31.19
1.68
2.45
3.24
192.76
22.60
6.07
30.30
102.70
19.31
6.47
22.75
55.87
8.11
1.37
10.15
186.76
12.06
7.46
20.88
39.06
2.84
1.46
4.62
10.30
6.23
1.04
6.07
34.87
5.19
1.89
6.53
10.96
1.29
Distance
(miles)
1.20
8.68
1.19
11.06
1.21
8.76
1.19
11.16
1.24
8.74
1.24
11.22
1.18
8.75
1.21
11.14
1.20
8.70
1.21
11.11
1.20
8.69
1.22
11.11
1.22
8.73
1.22
11.17
1.21
8.72
1.25
11.18
1.19
8.68
1.20
11.08
1.15
8.70
1.21
11.07
1.22
8.70
1.22
11.15
1.22
8.84
17
-------
RunID
84455
84455
84456
84456
84456
84456
84457
84457
84457
84457
84458
84458
84458
84458
84459
84459
84459
84459
84461
84461
84461
84461
84462
84462
84462
84462
84463
84463
84463
84463
84464
84464
84464
84464
84465
84465
84465
84465
84467
84467
84467
84467
84468
84468
84468
84468
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.37
0.23
16.58
1.19
6.62
2.36
5.69
0.17
0.61
0.49
5.31
0.41
1.14
0.71
4.31
0.14
1.54
0.45
7.98
2.46
3.80
2.85
22.28
2.62
1.26
3.56
2.04
0.12
0.51
0.25
6.39
0.22
1.05
0.61
2.89
0.04
0.37
0.21
10.50
1.49
3.69
2.11
3.01
0.04
0.35
0.22
BKI
0.34
0.24
11.66
0.70
3.51
1.46
5.93
0.15
0.60
0.49
5.15
0.40
1.09
0.68
4.38
0.13
1.28
0.43
7.73
2.22
3.39
2.59
19.20
2.51
1.61
3.32
2.27
0.10
0.61
0.25
7.06
0.18
1.07
0.61
3.36
0.03
0.40
0.23
9.88
1.04
2.73
1.61
3.38
0.03
0.38
0.23
CO (g/m)
SMT
5.43
5.13
175.39
30.82
70.30
41.02
26.18
8.75
14.57
10.07
70.07
14.21
14.20
17.01
66.55
5.40
16.57
9.34
84.41
17.97
27.29
22.12
387.71
89.08
15.79
99.70
26.36
8.09
10.45
9.23
82.85
1.39
7.48
6.11
37.61
1.12
5.86
3.35
146.84
14.71
19.06
21.89
35.61
1.44
6.34
3.57
BKI
3.98
4.62
119.76
19.54
30.43
25.46
19.28
6.05
8.60
6.93
72.76
14.05
11.07
16.79
69.02
4.89
11.78
8.73
69.40
15.05
20.43
18.28
356.11
90.28
16.45
99.11
25.44
6.39
7.93
7.51
87.56
0.98
6.32
5.93
42.48
0.85
5.37
3.32
130.22
11.48
11.26
17.60
40.24
1.15
6.06
3.54
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.49
0.45
5.18
1.34
1.74
1.57
4.28
1.48
2.25
1.68
2.83
1.23
2.26
1.38
3.66
1.80
3.38
2.01
5.90
5.49
7.82
5.67
0.39
1.09
3.09
1.19
2.67
0.53
0.71
0.66
2.61
0.68
1.56
0.84
4.68
0.67
0.78
0.88
2.51
1.74
2.40
1.83
3.47
0.58
0.60
0.73
BKI
0.47
0.44
4.57
1.35
1.53
1.53
4.84
1.80
2.72
2.02
2.52
1.16
2.20
1.30
3.27
1.66
3.09
1.84
5.92
4.94
6.00
5.07
0.52
1.07
2.67
1.15
2.87
0.64
0.81
0.77
2.76
0.72
1.49
0.88
4.73
0.70
0.77
0.92
2.43
1.74
2.34
1.81
3.50
0.63
0.63
0.78
C02 (g/m)
SMT
590.94
439.62
1003.16
555.14
842.01
598.07
920.85
457.77
642.33
494.92
898.05
476.51
677.35
511.47
893.89
466.42
639.50
500.59
701.86
404.78
587.57
433.21
507.73
371.45
576.80
393.09
619.12
355.14
491.20
378.72
741.18
444.39
592.83
470.42
904.00
473.37
632.23
506.96
590.92
386.36
553.07
408.71
862.73
452.81
609.86
485.25
BKI
535.62
427.58
710.90
466.17
596.54
487.81
891.67
458.35
611.96
492.17
799.69
462.23
605.23
489.03
782.59
443.56
546.85
468.54
653.87
382.08
510.60
405.38
478.33
373.72
554.49
391.90
615.31
344.76
450.40
366.52
710.55
421.62
545.28
445.46
899.81
492.16
639.34
523.56
521.32
344.11
441.74
360.11
848.85
468.40
606.72
498.02
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.83
1.83
70.87
36.65
20.54
37.30
86.09
19.08
12.71
22.22
21.09
21.19
3.05
19.93
12.97
4.46
1.59
4.70
46.54
2.98
3.06
5.26
350.87
21.90
5.93
38.05
16.76
112.62
21.50
101.18
96.83
31.12
7.26
32.94
12.06
213.26
10.42
188.71
83.37
21.02
7.88
23.32
18.84
4.61
2.73
5.22
Distance
(miles)
1.22
11.28
1.18
8.66
1.20
11.03
1.23
8.71
1.21
11.15
1.14
8.67
1.20
11.02
1.21
8.72
1.23
11.16
1.21
8.72
1.22
11.16
1.21
8.69
1.22
11.12
1.24
8.76
1.22
11.22
1.22
8.70
1.20
11.12
1.20
8.70
1.21
11.11
1.17
8.56
1.20
10.93
1.20
8.65
1.21
11.06
18
-------
RunID
84469
84469
84469
84469
84470
84470
84470
84470
84472
84472
84472
84472
84473
84473
84473
84473
84474
84474
84474
84474
84475
84475
84475
84475
84477
84477
84477
84477
84479
84479
84479
84479
84480
84480
84480
84480
84482
84482
84482
84482
84483
84483
84483
84483
84484
84484
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
11.69
0.81
1.63
1.44
112.93
56.86
79.73
61.47
67.47
5.04
5.85
8.72
2.50
0.06
0.25
0.20
6.21
0.99
1.91
1.32
9.09
1.24
2.73
1.75
8.78
1.05
0.93
1.45
3.82
0.17
0.40
0.38
7.81
2.45
3.98
2.84
10.27
0.54
1.16
1.11
4.97
0.15
0.16
0.41
10.13
0.53
BKI
12.01
0.72
1.70
1.38
30.11
14.75
22.74
16.14
20.31
3.21
4.22
4.26
2.69
0.04
0.20
0.19
5.33
0.79
1.57
1.08
10.00
1.04
2.62
1.61
9.77
1.04
0.95
1.49
4.18
0.16
0.45
0.39
8.20
2.35
3.66
2.74
11.31
0.47
1.19
1.11
5.27
0.11
0.14
0.38
11.15
0.46
CO (g/m)
SMT
152.16
9.85
15.49
17.70
607.87
204.28
373.01
237.74
512.79
54.99
62.71
82.10
28.33
1.88
6.95
3.63
66.09
11.57
15.82
14.67
158.89
24.05
35.98
31.84
185.06
52.69
16.36
57.06
49.13
3.18
5.94
5.78
85.63
18.92
28.17
23.02
135.97
6.17
3.57
13.01
34.80
2.76
3.02
4.48
142.62
5.78
BKI
146.60
7.79
10.60
15.24
475.60
185.41
319.11
210.51
377.33
39.96
38.24
59.14
26.89
1.57
5.45
3.17
46.77
8.54
10.17
10.62
146.84
24.67
30.10
31.35
183.74
54.35
13.74
58.25
50.06
2.76
5.63
5.43
75.59
17.11
20.85
20.41
134.87
6.03
3.07
12.75
33.96
2.38
1.91
3.99
142.06
5.49
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.78
2.52
3.68
2.62
1.23
2.16
1.73
2.08
1.29
1.91
2.42
1.91
3.79
0.68
1.03
0.87
2.81
1.16
1.95
1.30
2.99
0.70
0.95
0.84
4.84
1.69
3.58
1.98
3.12
0.64
0.84
0.78
6.61
5.70
7.61
5.88
5.26
8.40
9.72
8.32
2.11
0.29
0.90
0.43
5.39
8.58
BKI
2.82
2.48
3.64
2.58
1.21
2.20
1.38
2.09
0.83
2.08
2.27
2.02
3.80
0.63
1.05
0.83
2.46
1.13
1.55
1.22
3.09
0.71
0.93
0.85
4.16
1.56
2.99
1.80
2.97
0.63
0.83
0.76
6.15
5.20
6.71
5.36
5.01
7.01
8.05
6.97
2.06
0.28
0.86
0.41
5.39
7.12
C02 (g/m)
SMT
686.62
431.57
570.00
454.60
915.30
543.20
664.02
571.61
783.58
512.73
738.91
544.44
1066.90
549.09
745.52
590.07
489.19
306.23
408.17
322.60
670.09
386.16
501.54
408.81
683.71
413.02
587.39
439.23
818.71
470.68
618.49
499.39
766.18
424.64
620.07
455.89
766.75
493.39
665.38
520.14
653.24
358.31
530.83
386.15
807.61
483.53
BKI
634.85
422.28
534.99
441.30
742.04
491.55
552.76
509.39
617.52
474.21
575.25
489.49
1003.41
539.87
686.98
574.45
383.51
259.16
307.58
268.88
650.93
378.82
464.19
398.80
616.84
404.45
491.80
421.54
784.73
466.26
608.30
492.78
717.55
409.46
550.38
435.12
773.53
486.94
599.72
510.14
585.31
333.05
422.25
352.43
831.30
482.37
PM2.5
(mg/m)
702.22
105.13
140.33
138.65
946.09
315.70
73.61
332.68
936.92
40.18
37.68
91.37
21.99
13.15
7.48
13.22
76.22
66.56
19.83
63.87
172.56
38.58
11.36
43.59
321.05
64.27
17.90
74.32
14.58
6.14
26.34
7.99
49.90
3.99
4.83
6.44
106.11
9.25
4.31
14.10
27.05
4.07
0.41
5.01
110.15
3.19
Distance
(miles)
1.20
8.71
1.22
11.13
1.26
8.75
1.23
11.24
1.36
8.84
1.24
11.43
1.21
8.67
1.20
11.08
1.17
8.61
1.17
10.96
1.18
8.67
1.20
11.05
1.18
8.62
1.19
10.99
1.20
8.72
1.22
11.14
1.20
8.68
1.18
11.05
1.25
8.76
1.21
11.22
1.20
8.71
1.23
11.13
1.19
8.75
19
-------
RunID
84484
84484
84485
84485
84485
84485
84487
84487
84487
84487
84488
84488
84488
84488
84489
84489
84489
84489
84490
84490
84490
84490
84492
84492
84492
84492
84493
84493
84493
84493
84494
84494
84494
84494
84495
84495
84495
84495
84497
84497
84497
84497
84498
84498
84498
84498
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.06
1.06
12.86
0.56
1.52
1.28
7.38
0.67
0.33
1.01
2.58
0.04
0.22
0.19
4.17
0.34
2.97
0.73
12.06
0.51
0.94
1.13
42.79
0.59
0.86
2.83
0.73
0.01
0.01
0.05
2.70
0.06
0.21
0.21
4.31
0.16
0.26
0.38
4.95
0.09
0.21
0.36
4.69
0.07
0.15
0.32
BKI
0.97
1.04
12.35
0.42
1.18
1.10
7.82
0.59
0.30
0.96
2.81
0.03
0.21
0.19
4.31
0.31
2.52
0.67
10.94
0.39
0.80
0.97
18.97
0.46
0.81
1.46
0.80
0.02
0.01
0.06
2.92
0.07
0.19
0.22
4.13
0.11
0.22
0.32
5.39
0.07
0.18
0.37
4.97
0.02
0.10
0.28
CO (g/m)
SMT
4.96
12.85
331.18
10.90
16.71
28.15
195.84
45.26
10.43
50.98
23.67
2.19
5.77
3.56
54.98
0.59
0.46
3.44
348.24
10.86
9.79
28.26
368.23
3.94
4.14
23.16
7.38
0.25
0.35
0.63
23.98
4.11
5.86
5.27
63.49
3.95
5.40
7.18
104.38
3.04
4.93
8.60
30.69
2.77
4.20
4.33
BKI
3.96
12.39
313.38
8.87
11.15
25.09
183.22
40.47
5.70
45.73
22.95
1.71
4.54
3.00
54.21
0.29
0.17
3.12
315.90
8.98
6.47
24.95
344.71
3.03
2.97
20.95
7.33
0.14
0.13
0.51
19.82
3.71
4.24
4.58
55.27
2.86
3.87
5.67
106.50
1.71
2.87
7.42
26.19
2.06
2.59
3.33
NOx (g/m)
SMT
8.76
8.43
2.42
0.91
1.75
1.04
2.43
2.67
5.57
2.86
3.04
0.65
0.89
0.79
3.43
3.43
2.11
3.34
2.38
0.85
1.91
1.00
2.67
1.64
1.74
1.70
0.39
0.01
0.01
0.03
2.26
1.16
1.20
1.22
1.96
0.47
0.43
0.55
0.78
0.58
0.91
0.61
1.51
0.37
0.41
0.43
BKI
7.40
7.05
2.28
0.89
1.73
1.02
2.61
2.72
4.85
2.86
3.12
0.70
0.95
0.84
3.17
3.21
2.00
3.12
2.30
0.88
1.89
1.02
2.75
1.57
1.61
1.63
0.40
0.01
0.01
0.03
2.28
1.13
1.17
1.19
1.82
0.45
0.35
0.52
0.77
0.52
0.77
0.55
1.57
0.35
0.39
0.42
C02 (g/m)
SMT
633.30
511.04
855.05
590.32
896.49
624.86
623.65
407.97
587.49
432.14
878.89
448.71
620.57
482.94
678.64
386.98
568.63
414.93
890.59
572.17
879.98
609.41
861.46
551.05
755.39
581.85
826.17
440.14
626.25
473.60
642.09
376.53
486.75
398.22
613.87
368.06
512.52
390.95
966.21
560.51
725.56
593.97
917.12
455.35
633.26
491.62
BKI
574.59
506.80
759.15
545.67
762.59
571.32
598.96
400.62
536.65
420.65
841.26
440.89
593.63
472.03
611.67
363.72
485.57
385.26
776.33
529.38
739.72
556.44
780.12
519.30
681.92
544.35
795.35
435.35
556.02
462.63
582.78
358.76
428.19
375.23
546.04
346.86
432.78
363.23
860.05
541.69
626.15
564.85
880.87
437.88
578.59
470.13
PM2.5
(mg/m)
2.80
8.66
94.91
16.73
4.55
20.05
152.90
15.83
6.17
22.53
20.19
1.63
1.58
2.58
33.33
14.95
7.49
15.40
26.63
2.62
2.02
3.84
727.21
16.06
7.41
52.72
5.90
0.74
1.86
1.09
11.94
2.20
2.93
2.75
9.38
1.70
1.41
2.08
22.89
26.36
1.66
24.40
35.17
9.21
2.81
10.10
Distance
(miles)
1.24
11.18
1.22
8.70
1.15
11.07
1.25
8.73
1.20
11.18
1.19
8.70
1.18
11.08
1.22
8.75
1.22
11.19
1.21
8.68
1.15
11.04
1.22
8.77
1.23
11.21
1.21
8.74
1.22
11.18
1.17
8.64
1.23
11.04
1.20
8.64
1.19
11.04
1.25
8.79
1.27
11.31
1.17
8.66
1.17
11.01
20
-------
RunID
84499
84499
84499
84499
84500
84500
84500
84500
84503
84503
84503
84503
84504
84504
84504
84504
84505
84505
84505
84505
84507
84507
84507
84507
84508
84508
84508
84508
84509
84509
84509
84509
84510
84510
84510
84510
84512
84512
84512
84512
84514
84514
84514
84514
84515
84515
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
5.04
0.16
0.13
0.41
3.23
0.32
0.80
0.51
1.54
0.02
0.05
0.11
3.51
0.20
0.19
0.37
4.57
0.34
1.28
0.62
7.61
2.43
3.94
2.80
4.36
0.24
0.24
0.45
8.21
1.94
3.23
2.37
10.38
2.51
4.26
3.04
127.53
68.55
73.75
72.24
3.56
0.11
0.05
0.29
4.39
0.18
BKI
6.07
0.16
0.15
0.47
3.56
0.32
0.90
0.53
1.58
0.03
0.06
0.11
3.93
0.18
0.20
0.38
4.84
0.33
1.26
0.62
6.79
2.17
3.43
2.51
4.85
0.22
0.27
0.47
7.76
1.73
2.79
2.13
9.96
2.22
3.74
2.74
28.76
16.45
27.34
17.97
3.75
0.02
-0.02
0.21
4.52
0.10
CO (g/m)
SMT
70.97
5.39
3.76
8.72
23.89
5.53
7.87
6.67
4.58
0.83
1.47
1.07
22.09
2.01
2.48
3.07
58.90
4.58
9.79
7.69
75.83
16.17
28.49
20.14
122.88
5.33
5.41
11.38
120.40
13.44
17.43
19.49
200.10
24.45
34.39
34.42
412.26
210.88
264.23
226.14
18.86
0.52
0.74
1.49
56.29
7.22
BKI
79.61
5.14
2.68
8.90
22.58
5.00
6.76
6.06
3.72
0.54
1.13
0.74
22.21
1.75
1.98
2.82
58.32
3.62
7.57
6.63
54.66
13.51
20.44
16.15
129.88
5.22
4.67
11.61
108.71
11.90
13.57
17.24
192.17
22.14
29.12
31.65
310.92
169.91
184.08
179.00
18.31
0.31
0.36
1.26
54.64
5.80
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.32
0.28
0.27
0.34
4.99
1.78
2.10
1.98
1.42
0.12
0.17
0.19
2.32
0.32
0.38
0.42
5.43
1.45
2.57
1.73
6.25
5.69
7.27
5.83
1.31
0.56
0.55
0.60
8.09
3.75
4.71
4.05
7.00
3.87
4.24
4.06
1.64
0.60
0.90
0.68
1.53
0.19
0.14
0.26
2.88
0.66
BKI
1.42
0.26
0.24
0.32
4.08
1.74
2.09
1.89
1.63
0.12
0.19
0.20
2.15
0.28
0.34
0.38
5.17
1.44
2.36
1.69
5.96
4.98
6.27
5.12
1.35
0.55
0.52
0.59
6.86
3.26
3.84
3.49
6.34
3.58
3.89
3.75
1.34
0.64
0.86
0.70
1.41
0.14
0.10
0.21
2.55
0.59
C02 (g/m)
SMT
574.41
329.41
430.52
349.35
683.41
381.26
434.99
401.17
850.46
443.34
629.14
477.64
731.36
414.76
577.70
442.28
755.05
437.09
608.07
465.15
745.09
411.29
620.44
443.27
396.15
249.92
337.67
263.38
924.96
550.65
773.05
586.33
981.22
612.21
848.36
648.26
795.00
403.10
565.32
437.15
816.78
450.40
579.55
478.55
810.04
446.13
BKI
553.36
331.55
401.81
348.21
636.43
390.30
471.26
409.04
815.70
444.55
624.86
476.38
708.03
409.97
553.07
434.87
714.39
416.43
532.91
439.47
645.15
377.84
517.20
401.66
401.82
261.52
334.75
273.72
784.89
492.42
617.44
516.86
911.32
594.65
793.83
625.32
615.13
354.10
422.03
374.06
793.32
443.60
568.85
470.46
664.20
380.85
PM2.5
(mg/m)
18.17
3.92
3.74
4.66
24.22
3.83
2.42
4.82
7.38
2.60
1.87
2.80
17.27
1.79
-0.08
2.46
11.46
9.00
1.89
8.63
23.59
1.06
3.85
2.44
14.37
2.11
1.35
2.69
125.94
8.01
4.02
14.08
48.13
22.37
2.14
22.33
389.15
177.78
70.35
181.76
14.74
3.32
2.41
3.85
38.50
3.76
Distance
(miles)
1.21
8.67
1.23
11.11
1.24
8.74
1.22
11.20
1.22
8.75
1.18
11.15
1.18
8.72
1.17
11.07
1.14
8.68
1.21
11.03
1.21
8.70
1.22
11.13
1.18
8.65
1.17
11.00
1.25
8.72
1.21
11.18
1.24
8.77
1.22
11.23
1.33
8.70
1.32
11.34
1.19
8.60
1.18
10.97
1.23
8.78
21
-------
RunID
84515
84515
84517
84517
84517
84517
84518
84518
84518
84518
84519
84519
84519
84519
84520
84520
84520
84520
84521
84521
84521
84521
84522
84522
84522
84522
84524
84524
84524
84524
84526
84526
84526
84526
84527
84527
84527
84527
84528
84528
84528
84528
84529
84529
84529
84529
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.26
0.41
5.48
0.11
0.24
0.40
6.90
0.22
0.69
0.60
13.15
0.67
1.92
1.41
1.65
0.05
0.05
0.13
3.01
0.09
0.10
0.24
4.21
0.09
0.13
0.32
5.09
0.12
0.41
0.41
8.28
0.29
1.13
0.77
8.30
0.31
1.18
0.80
4.59
0.36
1.05
0.63
18.01
0.48
0.63
1.41
BKI
0.15
0.33
6.33
0.06
0.22
0.40
7.78
0.13
0.85
0.58
11.28
0.48
1.67
1.13
1.75
0.04
0.05
0.13
3.46
0.08
0.10
0.25
4.35
0.06
0.11
0.29
5.91
0.07
0.38
0.41
8.99
0.26
1.19
0.79
7.35
0.23
0.85
0.65
5.10
0.30
1.06
0.61
16.72
0.22
0.51
1.10
CO (g/m)
SMT
9.21
9.98
42.24
1.29
3.62
3.58
104.45
4.29
8.26
9.81
126.97
8.81
19.16
15.74
7.57
0.85
0.75
1.20
34.16
3.57
3.01
5.12
42.17
1.14
1.85
3.42
93.99
1.55
3.72
6.75
84.01
5.24
10.99
9.82
159.29
3.67
10.77
12.57
41.22
8.97
12.52
10.91
311.28
6.27
9.27
22.32
BKI
5.60
8.38
46.19
1.15
3.05
3.62
111.82
3.38
6.45
9.26
85.21
6.62
13.13
11.19
7.71
0.72
0.48
1.07
35.48
3.43
2.83
5.04
39.29
0.80
1.05
2.88
100.53
1.08
2.30
6.58
84.08
4.84
8.70
9.29
139.57
2.70
6.23
10.28
41.52
6.83
8.98
8.79
302.40
5.25
6.71
20.87
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.99
0.80
2.69
0.60
0.52
0.70
2.16
0.66
0.72
0.74
5.28
3.43
5.58
3.67
0.79
0.14
0.19
0.18
2.82
0.34
0.42
0.47
2.29
0.30
0.39
0.41
2.04
1.18
0.98
1.22
2.67
0.95
1.59
1.08
2.60
0.51
1.15
0.67
6.13
1.23
1.47
1.50
1.08
1.55
1.85
1.55
BKI
0.76
0.71
2.53
0.56
0.47
0.65
2.04
0.67
0.72
0.75
4.08
3.04
4.40
3.19
0.83
0.14
0.17
0.18
2.97
0.34
0.41
0.48
2.32
0.30
0.41
0.41
2.14
1.24
1.01
1.27
3.00
1.05
1.71
1.20
2.18
0.42
0.98
0.55
5.98
1.33
1.52
1.58
1.15
1.46
1.69
1.46
C02 (g/m)
SMT
729.07
485.14
851.53
477.64
639.31
508.30
734.85
415.32
554.98
441.86
1014.21
509.12
768.87
553.44
919.02
444.76
619.04
482.03
694.79
373.61
519.64
400.40
928.65
498.86
701.36
536.22
511.12
345.92
446.62
361.99
812.48
474.28
691.95
507.29
1259.81
691.08
1003.98
743.67
951.80
490.58
665.71
526.88
510.78
373.17
517.81
390.26
BKI
489.29
403.43
838.78
483.29
623.99
511.52
701.11
413.07
522.25
435.76
698.30
443.44
566.62
465.20
866.40
441.22
589.70
474.17
693.07
381.20
490.01
404.90
861.85
474.72
616.20
505.22
513.99
337.21
402.72
351.43
796.74
477.19
656.97
506.58
980.73
620.22
771.25
650.11
948.80
492.34
637.90
526.18
480.64
374.49
463.62
386.18
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.42
5.43
124.67
17.14
3.12
21.76
22.41
1.42
3.94
2.69
129.25
17.44
13.15
23.01
15.22
2.13
0.09
2.68
14.39
2.00
1.39
2.60
10.50
5.74
2.10
5.74
30.01
3.01
-0.13
4.26
55.40
53.65
31.10
52.17
30.69
15.59
1.18
15.39
54.90
143.40
60.56
133.10
419.60
38.97
6.05
56.52
Distance
(miles)
1.23
11.23
1.20
8.72
1.20
11.13
1.20
8.71
1.22
11.13
1.20
8.63
1.17
11.00
1.22
8.68
1.22
11.13
1.19
8.73
1.21
11.13
1.24
8.76
1.21
11.21
1.27
8.74
1.23
11.23
1.23
8.82
1.23
11.28
1.24
8.70
1.22
11.15
1.20
8.71
1.20
11.11
1.21
8.77
1.21
11.19
22
-------
RunID
84531
84531
84531
84531
84532
84532
84532
84532
84533
84533
84533
84533
84534
84534
84534
84534
84536
84536
84536
84536
84537
84537
84537
84537
84538
84538
84538
84538
84539
84539
84539
84539
84541
84541
84541
84541
84542
84542
84542
84542
84543
84543
84543
84543
84544
84544
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HCO
SMT
7.73
0.51
0.41
0.88
2.88
0.05
0.07
0.21
3.21
0.15
0.55
0.34
6.92
0.23
0.39
0.59
8.04
2.52
3.99
2.91
2.59
0.18
0.16
0.30
1.91
0.04
0.08
0.14
5.14
0.33
1.04
0.63
5.02
0.54
0.71
0.79
4.22
0.52
0.76
0.73
1.86
0.15
0.18
0.24
8.25
2.46
?/m)
BKI
8.61
0.29
0.37
0.73
3.31
0.03
0.06
0.21
3.22
0.13
0.45
0.31
7.57
0.16
0.42
0.58
7.93
2.33
3.59
2.71
2.40
0.19
0.10
0.30
2.00
0.03
0.09
0.14
5.39
0.31
0.90
0.61
5.12
0.45
0.62
0.70
4.52
0.52
0.78
0.74
1.76
0.15
0.17
0.24
7.68
2.29
CO
SMT
154.71
14.98
10.98
22.05
49.53
0.71
0.88
3.57
44.66
2.45
6.84
4.98
46.18
2.94
6.57
5.45
82.15
17.32
28.41
21.50
38.94
3.89
2.20
5.61
23.36
2.44
2.88
3.56
48.04
6.16
11.86
8.76
60.81
14.95
9.68
16.98
43.34
14.44
11.63
15.74
30.53
3.93
2.43
5.25
83.95
18.37
(g/m)
BKI
168.00
14.44
8.55
22.00
58.48
0.68
0.77
3.84
41.13
1.99
4.22
4.21
46.99
2.60
5.78
5.20
69.75
15.13
20.91
18.43
31.96
3.09
1.26
4.48
19.23
1.83
2.33
2.77
41.98
5.38
8.40
7.49
55.70
11.59
7.14
13.57
42.21
13.57
9.91
14.81
23.14
3.09
1.25
4.03
64.55
15.56
NOx
SMT
.95
.67
.89
.70
.36
0.21
0.22
0.28
4.42
0.96
1.10
1.15
2.22
0.58
1.44
0.73
6.30
5.40
6.82
5.54
2.29
0.71
1.09
0.82
3.67
1.00
0.67
1.11
4.61
0.60
0.60
0.82
4.52
1.08
1.45
1.29
4.14
0.88
0.99
1.06
2.46
0.73
1.13
0.85
6.00
5.49
(g/m)
BKI
2.00
1.67
1.95
1.71
1.47
0.19
0.21
0.26
4.03
0.90
1.00
1.07
2.16
0.57
1.27
0.71
5.38
4.59
5.21
4.68
2.14
0.64
0.92
0.73
3.55
0.99
0.75
1.10
4.10
0.57
0.55
0.75
3.60
0.90
1.15
1.05
4.08
0.91
1.04
1.08
2.25
0.65
0.85
0.75
5.88
4.98
CO2
SMT
479.90
341.37
427.92
354.69
750.69
471.75
656.16
500.88
1151.09
649.80
898.13
693.60
694.21
374.93
529.56
402.44
758.84
409.04
590.62
440.18
1053.99
544.25
779.46
587.41
851.10
468.85
625.80
499.99
1023.53
572.71
812.04
612.67
941.56
506.29
696.98
542.43
851.99
428.30
603.23
462.55
1030.65
545.36
775.20
587.66
725.71
404.19
(g/m)
BKI
498.79
339.87
394.55
351.92
794.84
479.97
622.19
507.07
1069.26
636.21
796.18
670.09
693.88
387.00
511.81
412.17
688.07
391.94
515.45
416.26
888.38
502.30
656.44
533.31
838.89
482.43
607.53
509.84
940.51
560.30
706.00
589.85
818.08
438.38
567.13
467.28
830.68
447.88
604.11
478.70
873.56
504.02
654.46
534.29
658.37
388.53
PM2.5
(mg/m)
68.05
16.99
2.14
18.61
10.93
5.83
1.61
5.81
11.87
6.47
2.28
6.46
37.99
29.12
8.24
28.13
48.30
3.88
2.49
6.14
20.12
2.26
2.02
3.18
3.50
0.93
1.09
1.07
27.43
2.59
3.59
3.95
64.91
3.09
3.64
6.33
48.34
2.44
3.63
4.91
12.77
3.58
2.35
3.98
47.00
5.28
Distance
(miles)
1.20
8.72
1.21
11.12
1.27
8.73
1.22
11.21
1.22
8.74
1.21
11.17
1.24
8.70
1.22
11.15
1.22
8.66
1.21
11.09
1.21
8.71
1.21
11.13
1.20
8.71
1.23
11.14
1.21
8.77
1.16
11.14
1.20
8.75
1.25
11.20
1.20
8.71
1.21
11.13
1.24
8.78
1.23
11.25
1.23
8.74
23
-------
RunID
84544
84544
84546
84546
84546
84546
84547
84547
84547
84547
84548
84548
84548
84548
84550
84550
84550
84550
84551
84551
84551
84551
84552
84552
84552
84552
84554
84554
84554
84554
84556
84556
84556
84556
84557
84557
84557
84557
84558
84558
84558
84558
84560
84560
84560
84560
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
4.04
2.87
3.86
0.23
0.42
0.44
3.69
0.15
0.25
0.34
3.40
0.24
0.83
0.45
11.03
1.88
4.80
2.54
3.44
0.05
0.03
0.23
2.54
0.02
0.05
0.16
7.34
0.33
1.30
0.76
3.17
0.09
0.24
0.27
3.07
0.04
0.02
0.20
13.04
0.28
0.13
0.96
2.96
0.17
0.22
0.32
BKI
3.66
2.67
3.64
0.17
0.33
0.37
4.73
0.13
0.25
0.38
3.69
0.24
0.87
0.47
11.13
1.82
4.79
2.50
3.84
0.04
0.04
0.25
2.88
0.01
0.04
0.17
7.12
0.24
1.20
0.67
3.43
0.08
0.25
0.27
3.60
0.03
0.01
0.21
11.04
0.07
0.10
0.65
2.71
0.11
0.00
0.24
CO (g/m)
SMT
32.66
22.81
48.23
4.65
9.77
7.32
33.96
2.21
2.16
3.87
30.29
2.42
6.71
4.20
94.84
13.22
28.53
18.43
36.05
2.95
1.95
4.64
54.01
0.30
0.52
3.13
115.03
4.08
13.20
10.46
21.83
3.20
5.16
4.32
30.88
0.49
0.38
2.07
85.38
2.30
1.17
6.70
23.24
2.99
2.07
4.01
BKI
23.39
18.70
38.92
3.45
6.11
5.51
35.99
2.03
1.55
3.78
30.37
2.04
5.67
3.79
77.88
13.40
25.88
17.53
39.26
2.19
1.55
4.14
59.17
0.18
0.52
3.27
99.78
3.74
10.31
9.22
22.22
3.00
4.56
4.12
33.19
0.36
0.18
2.06
74.30
2.07
0.83
5.77
18.03
1.86
0.00
2.59
NOx (g/m)
SMT
7.37
5.64
3.42
0.54
1.27
0.74
1.88
0.33
0.45
0.42
1.88
0.49
1.37
0.63
6.84
1.80
2.03
2.07
1.05
0.21
0.12
0.25
1.80
0.14
0.28
0.24
3.22
1.36
1.09
1.44
4.57
0.60
0.83
0.83
2.47
0.24
0.29
0.36
0.86
0.36
0.57
0.40
2.04
0.33
0.72
0.45
BKI
6.43
5.13
3.23
0.53
1.12
0.72
1.97
0.33
0.41
0.42
1.83
0.50
1.32
0.63
6.87
1.80
1.98
2.07
1.14
0.19
0.10
0.24
1.69
0.11
0.21
0.20
3.27
1.36
1.03
1.44
4.47
0.61
0.86
0.83
2.47
0.21
0.29
0.34
0.68
0.34
0.52
0.37
1.81
0.24
0.01
0.31
C02 (g/m)
SMT
599.19
434.62
802.76
497.85
769.13
533.03
524.58
281.66
355.02
299.57
710.42
396.97
552.27
424.38
861.48
477.54
654.54
509.46
957.85
475.25
597.73
509.68
859.71
451.96
665.01
488.16
1009.92
605.10
794.62
639.27
851.63
446.84
640.17
481.60
904.71
474.89
675.45
511.55
962.55
528.73
778.96
569.08
704.85
425.31
577.96
450.99
BKI
532.41
412.84
706.48
475.88
658.71
500.90
520.34
288.64
352.02
305.26
695.01
404.19
516.11
427.29
849.30
496.41
649.15
524.94
917.08
489.01
616.42
520.95
837.67
451.44
625.67
483.63
921.32
583.27
708.29
609.71
843.48
461.77
622.69
493.01
886.13
469.17
643.31
503.02
887.69
513.90
723.46
547.54
562.17
326.13
11.58
316.54
PM2.5
(mg/m)
5.65
7.52
8.20
1.98
7.85
2.72
40.26
17.21
6.38
17.67
9.46
2.50
2.04
2.84
125.34
17.48
8.67
22.27
16.49
5.22
2.68
5.64
8.72
1.78
0.35
2.04
20.80
14.30
1.71
13.76
46.83
2.32
1.66
4.63
19.75
1.80
1.27
2.70
602.07
4.99
1.45
36.01
11.21
6.10
2.25
6.10
Distance
(miles)
1.21
11.18
1.20
8.59
1.21
11.00
1.21
8.68
1.21
11.11
1.22
8.71
1.20
11.13
1.16
8.77
1.24
11.18
1.24
8.72
1.23
11.19
1.19
8.68
1.21
11.08
1.20
8.66
1.21
11.08
1.22
8.68
1.19
11.09
1.19
8.62
1.20
11.01
1.21
8.71
1.16
11.08
1.23
8.72
1.23
11.18
24
-------
RunID
84562
84562
84562
84562
84563
84563
84563
84563
84564
84564
84564
84564
84566
84566
84566
84566
84567
84567
84567
84567
84568
84568
84568
84568
84569
84569
84569
84569
84570
84570
84570
84570
84572
84572
84572
84572
84573
84573
84573
84573
84574
84574
84574
84574
84575
84575
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.59
0.03
0.04
0.11
2.02
0.07
0.02
0.17
3.52
0.06
0.23
0.25
5.31
0.23
0.24
0.50
30.55
11.10
16.33
12.49
3.62
0.54
1.24
0.74
2.80
0.16
0.38
0.32
2.86
0.28
0.85
0.46
4.19
0.14
0.60
0.39
3.11
0.04
0.19
0.22
3.68
0.10
0.89
0.34
9.47
0.34
BKI
1.51
0.02
0.05
0.10
2.14
0.06
0.02
0.17
4.03
0.04
0.22
0.26
6.24
0.20
0.29
0.51
28.73
11.19
15.88
12.44
3.58
0.42
0.99
0.61
3.02
0.13
0.35
0.30
2.38
0.18
0.61
0.33
4.97
0.12
0.62
0.42
3.31
0.03
0.18
0.22
3.92
0.09
0.92
0.35
10.65
0.25
CO (g/m)
SMT
13.87
0.19
0.52
0.95
27.83
0.89
0.34
2.27
41.92
1.15
3.37
3.44
83.69
3.73
2.81
7.86
607.13
244.47
198.05
260.54
30.58
10.65
13.45
11.84
32.76
5.50
8.34
7.14
61.32
8.62
19.75
12.20
82.40
3.50
4.37
7.76
29.44
1.82
2.95
3.37
62.46
3.55
24.16
8.06
211.00
7.68
BKI
12.98
0.07
0.27
0.78
24.64
0.66
0.13
1.87
45.70
1.00
2.68
3.46
91.65
3.54
2.18
7.98
529.63
234.76
174.65
246.30
25.77
8.04
9.74
9.03
30.02
4.91
6.82
6.38
45.97
6.58
12.74
9.09
91.53
3.29
3.56
8.00
29.34
1.56
2.09
3.08
60.96
3.40
23.55
7.80
212.85
6.39
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.12
0.36
0.13
0.02
0.14
3.15
0.58
0.56
0.71
2.05
0.37
0.49
0.47
0.41
0.14
1.50
0.25
2.18
1.38
1.50
1.43
2.67
0.76
0.92
0.88
2.60
0.43
0.36
0.54
1.60
1.05
1.03
1.07
3.36
0.85
1.65
1.04
2.21
0.80
1.36
0.91
2.31
1.42
BKI
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.10
0.35
0.14
0.02
0.14
2.79
0.56
0.55
0.67
2.21
0.39
0.50
0.49
0.54
0.30
1.55
0.40
2.33
1.34
1.35
1.39
2.63
0.78
0.88
0.88
2.25
0.40
0.32
0.49
1.56
1.07
1.03
1.10
3.09
0.84
1.54
1.01
2.05
0.79
1.29
0.89
2.22
1.42
C02 (g/m)
SMT
908.30
504.23
748.38
543.05
952.18
488.11
657.52
524.23
804.52
448.03
599.57
477.35
716.85
427.71
560.31
452.12
742.90
368.57
737.60
413.85
703.73
369.43
571.06
400.19
801.17
411.43
596.53
444.84
760.44
417.64
588.23
447.77
593.15
379.24
482.58
397.89
935.53
485.95
731.56
526.77
716.35
384.10
562.87
413.90
687.15
421.86
BKI
823.33
472.54
642.19
503.15
939.33
494.00
636.44
527.05
782.75
456.51
591.76
483.15
725.92
445.41
536.46
466.10
668.03
361.91
680.91
400.09
620.77
373.28
464.04
391.76
754.91
403.27
524.58
430.50
614.90
372.92
465.00
392.10
580.45
392.25
478.15
408.23
893.59
483.48
686.40
519.34
692.76
389.79
544.31
416.33
651.82
419.84
PM2.5
(mg/m)
7.66
4.41
1.63
4.39
5.37
0.73
0.00
0.92
37.02
3.70
3.63
5.44
108.75
33.83
20.53
36.75
245.13
33.16
30.53
44.26
15.70
3.55
3.00
4.11
20.19
2.60
0.15
3.37
4.00
0.87
0.41
1.00
12.11
3.25
2.07
3.64
38.72
3.04
4.21
5.03
4.65
0.87
0.58
1.05
58.49
2.93
Distance
(miles)
1.23
8.66
1.20
11.09
1.20
8.70
1.21
11.10
1.21
8.68
1.22
11.11
1.18
8.73
1.20
11.11
1.23
8.70
1.19
11.12
1.11
8.62
1.20
10.93
1.22
8.60
1.20
11.02
1.22
8.72
1.21
11.16
1.23
8.72
1.21
11.16
1.24
8.69
1.19
11.12
1.19
8.69
1.22
11.10
1.22
8.75
25
-------
RunID
84575
84575
84577
84577
84577
84577
84578
84578
84578
84578
84580
84580
84580
84580
84581
84581
84581
84581
84582
84582
84582
84582
84584
84584
84584
84584
84587
84587
84587
84587
84588
84588
84588
84588
84589
84589
84589
84589
84591
84591
84591
84591
84592
84592
84592
84592
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HCO
SMT
1.81
0.92
2.81
0.06
0.14
0.21
7.93
2.57
4.36
2.97
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.94
0.18
0.73
0.47
8.26
1.68
2.68
2.09
3.10
0.15
0.23
0.32
9.21
0.20
0.23
0.68
21.73
1.19
2.21
2.35
1.71
0.04
0.02
0.12
3.87
0.14
0.37
0.36
53.12
9.30
2.51
11.23
?/m)
BKI
1.59
0.89
2.93
0.06
0.14
0.22
7.45
2.33
3.75
2.70
2.86
0.05
0.16
0.19
4.72
0.12
0.61
0.40
9.56
1.58
2.73
2.07
3.20
0.14
0.23
0.31
10.55
0.09
0.22
0.64
14.78
0.97
2.03
1.78
2.11
0.03
0.02
0.14
4.14
0.13
0.36
0.36
20.94
5.12
2.01
5.76
CO
SMT
28.65
19.86
42.00
6.12
8.87
8.18
84.77
18.67
30.48
22.94
0.10
0.00
0.04
0.01
66.04
3.18
11.35
7.08
79.73
23.43
22.17
26.27
27.72
3.94
4.09
5.25
60.42
1.55
4.46
4.86
373.53
30.81
30.54
49.00
18.52
0.59
0.29
1.51
55.38
5.04
7.83
7.94
268.65
78.11
12.05
83.51
(g/m)
BKI
24.33
18.51
37.95
5.40
6.48
7.16
66.25
15.86
21.70
18.92
30.00
1.65
3.73
3.12
62.92
2.58
9.07
6.24
81.73
21.50
18.28
24.39
25.96
3.44
2.90
4.62
66.64
1.33
2.84
4.85
341.85
27.78
23.68
44.23
19.53
0.53
0.18
1.50
58.30
4.23
5.14
7.16
210.67
73.38
8.90
75.85
NOx
SMT
2.63
1.55
4.58
1.88
2.96
2.10
6.42
5.26
6.75
5.42
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.38
0.77
0.57
0.79
2.11
1.42
1.16
1.44
2.55
0.22
0.39
0.36
2.92
0.92
.14
.04
.09
.50
.94
1.51
0.35
0.17
0.22
0.18
2.95
1.66
1.84
1.74
1.22
2.27
3.46
2.31
(g/m)
BKI
2.50
1.54
3.69
1.50
2.31
1.67
6.17
4.98
5.89
5.10
3.19
0.46
0.80
0.61
1.38
0.76
0.55
0.78
2.29
1.34
1.07
1.37
2.45
0.19
0.32
0.32
3.14
0.98
1.34
1.12
1.17
1.52
1.97
1.53
0.35
0.16
0.20
0.17
2.78
1.55
1.74
1.63
0.94
1.86
2.87
1.89
CO2
SMT
579.32
446.92
916.71
482.23
721.10
521.50
758.51
414.82
624.20
447.29
1.86
0.00
0.64
0.13
720.64
400.54
576.23
429.74
558.70
359.04
470.07
377.35
584.36
371.94
548.06
395.96
784.13
444.82
564.83
471.10
946.95
620.93
874.20
656.38
579.58
282.08
392.62
305.59
915.04
511.62
693.44
546.21
491.38
362.04
485.01
379.45
(g/m)
BKI
532.08
439.91
854.84
471.28
647.21
503.33
678.12
392.47
527.04
416.83
991.02
474.85
644.34
510.78
656.17
391.25
522.48
414.46
560.54
361.22
450.52
377.87
541.54
374.03
477.01
390.46
763.59
463.00
573.73
486.39
876.68
607.26
781.81
634.10
563.31
286.20
357.28
305.68
868.61
522.03
650.19
549.47
403.40
335.32
397.15
344.28
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.97
5.78
32.81
4.65
2.62
5.97
32.10
3.74
4.60
5.29
35.23
8.10
2.37
8.98
5.68
0.66
2.95
1.09
55.80
13.05
17.46
15.57
21.33
5.09
2.93
5.82
148.35
4.89
1.06
12.14
160.26
11.49
9.96
19.30
600.02
1.77
0.42
32.80
6.77
24.37
0.93
21.79
247.18
74.48
12.39
79.12
Distance
(miles)
1.23
11.19
1.19
8.68
1.20
11.07
1.21
8.65
1.20
11.06
1.08
8.79
1.22
11.08
1.24
8.76
1.21
11.21
1.17
8.55
1.22
10.94
1.27
8.77
1.25
11.29
1.21
8.70
1.20
11.11
1.24
8.76
1.26
11.26
1.21
8.78
1.24
11.23
1.22
8.70
1.23
11.15
1.60
10.54
1.79
13.93
26
-------
RunID
84593
84593
84593
84593
84595
84595
84595
84595
84596
84596
84596
84596
84597
84597
84597
84597
84599
84599
84599
84599
84600
84600
84600
84600
84601
84601
84601
84601
84603
84603
84603
84603
84605
84605
84605
84605
84606
84606
84606
84606
84609
84609
84609
84609
84611
84611
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.82
0.05
0.05
0.14
2.06
0.05
0.03
0.15
2.61
0.08
0.32
0.23
5.71
0.57
1.07
0.87
8.45
0.15
0.11
0.58
5.30
0.14
0.55
0.44
17.07
5.01
6.56
5.73
6.29
3.29
8.08
3.78
18.20
1.63
4.84
2.69
9.23
2.35
3.96
2.82
24.39
4.56
5.46
5.69
5.33
0.12
BKI
2.09
0.02
0.04
0.13
2.22
0.04
0.04
0.15
2.76
0.07
0.26
0.22
6.17
0.55
0.92
0.87
10.00
0.05
0.11
0.57
5.64
0.10
0.54
0.42
15.53
3.82
5.26
4.53
6.34
2.42
5.81
2.85
14.82
0.81
3.50
1.70
9.35
2.26
3.58
2.72
16.28
2.88
3.46
3.64
6.63
0.07
CO (g/m)
SMT
28.86
2.08
2.17
3.48
26.85
3.72
1.31
4.76
43.96
3.41
4.70
5.63
109.37
12.54
10.35
17.46
47.73
0.94
0.84
3.35
78.56
4.99
10.69
9.23
209.68
71.14
125.44
81.91
108.98
7.87
6.04
12.84
204.08
17.10
25.38
27.17
96.47
18.53
31.44
23.48
158.74
51.87
42.26
56.98
70.55
1.88
BKI
29.80
1.89
1.18
3.30
26.82
3.06
0.80
4.15
44.56
3.28
3.33
5.46
114.25
12.57
7.96
17.55
51.64
0.67
0.44
3.28
75.34
4.61
7.51
8.50
154.87
53.92
84.79
61.33
118.91
8.02
4.78
13.40
152.45
8.94
9.39
16.19
79.62
16.45
21.77
20.08
99.24
42.62
28.83
44.72
83.29
1.77
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.29
0.10
0.03
0.16
2.75
1.06
0.81
1.14
2.58
0.64
1.12
0.77
1.65
0.36
0.88
0.46
1.59
0.20
0.35
0.28
2.40
1.19
1.74
1.29
3.46
2.76
4.17
2.89
0.89
3.27
3.07
3.13
1.57
2.44
2.17
2.38
5.91
5.15
6.88
5.31
2.87
3.05
3.14
3.05
3.43
1.42
BKI
1.23
0.11
0.05
0.16
2.83
1.05
0.85
1.13
2.43
0.67
1.14
0.80
1.70
0.35
0.91
0.46
1.58
0.20
0.39
0.28
2.29
1.14
1.65
1.24
3.08
2.70
3.72
2.79
1.04
3.44
3.55
3.33
1.95
2.61
2.43
2.57
5.62
4.82
5.96
4.94
2.69
2.96
2.61
2.92
3.27
1.41
C02 (g/m)
SMT
680.45
336.81
486.95
365.10
613.66
309.79
387.34
331.06
798.00
438.02
591.70
467.60
622.76
327.84
507.79
355.75
811.42
391.20
531.64
422.68
986.52
555.32
794.00
594.55
899.42
498.02
654.91
529.17
527.42
279.52
373.22
298.54
796.86
489.41
705.33
519.96
748.72
402.34
602.65
434.25
934.84
546.07
871.73
589.28
727.76
409.15
BKI
622.05
348.89
432.70
369.05
596.83
319.63
399.50
339.68
740.10
437.63
542.37
460.89
576.68
333.74
445.78
354.16
792.13
399.59
516.90
427.98
893.41
540.20
710.69
570.58
721.70
460.62
522.33
478.50
519.99
293.65
351.12
309.04
669.45
481.38
596.36
498.77
679.46
391.20
510.53
414.42
676.56
468.65
593.44
488.40
727.69
424.40
PM2.5
(mg/m)
22.17
2.37
1.99
3.38
12.88
1.57
1.10
2.13
1.67
1.89
0.77
1.80
17.74
3.69
87.70
8.61
2.20
12.22
57.31
22.18
5.49
22.84
180.28
42.57
17.76
47.94
32.32
6.41
2.66
7.46
148.40
48.49
12.12
50.99
51.20
3.23
3.62
5.73
100.22
22.75
2.79
25.56
39.63
3.68
Distance
(miles)
1.20
8.64
1.20
11.04
1.20
8.63
1.19
11.03
1.21
8.68
1.21
11.11
1.21
8.74
1.21
11.16
1.19
8.76
1.22
11.17
1.21
8.75
1.23
11.18
1.19
8.69
1.23
11.11
1.15
8.62
1.19
10.96
1.14
8.63
1.19
10.96
1.18
8.66
1.21
11.05
1.25
8.72
1.19
11.16
1.21
8.68
27
-------
RunID
84611
84611
84612
84612
84612
84612
84616
84616
84616
84616
84617
84617
84617
84617
84618
84618
84618
84618
84620
84620
84620
84620
84621
84621
84621
84621
84622
84622
84622
84622
84623
84623
84623
84623
84624
84624
84624
84624
84626
84626
84626
84626
84627
84627
84627
84627
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.21
0.40
0.11
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.73
0.03
0.14
0.13
3.49
0.15
0.52
0.35
7.08
0.53
1.62
0.95
14.94
4.36
9.63
5.25
5.31
0.21
1.55
0.56
12.22
0.19
0.54
0.83
15.87
0.82
1.54
1.66
9.02
2.44
3.78
2.87
11.58
0.43
2.90
1.21
93.36
31.11
62.25
36.53
BKI
0.23
0.43
2.08
0.03
0.04
0.14
1.87
0.05
0.16
0.15
3.36
0.14
0.46
0.34
3.49
0.48
0.75
0.66
9.09
2.31
3.87
2.76
5.33
0.19
1.18
0.51
6.63
0.13
0.22
0.47
8.30
0.39
0.64
0.82
8.36
2.16
3.26
2.56
11.77
0.43
2.59
1.20
31.68
12.78
27.95
14.84
CO (g/m)
SMT
3.13
5.58
0.80
1.27
0.43
1.19
12.48
0.41
2.50
1.17
33.94
4.12
9.81
6.11
182.52
14.64
37.95
25.04
105.74
35.55
86.84
42.57
86.34
3.45
12.03
8.29
87.56
2.14
8.77
6.99
396.59
16.90
31.04
37.82
109.72
20.53
31.09
25.89
291.83
19.03
45.82
35.85
265.84
71.50
139.19
86.27
BKI
2.57
6.11
19.42
1.20
0.12
2.08
11.97
0.26
2.06
0.98
27.29
3.40
6.84
4.92
83.66
15.92
16.56
19.55
52.98
19.06
28.34
21.38
87.42
2.93
7.28
7.47
38.97
2.17
2.61
4.09
198.86
8.27
10.23
18.40
88.34
17.89
22.20
21.85
294.30
19.64
41.58
36.13
206.90
57.39
106.19
68.54
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.02
1.57
0.06
0.24
0.21
0.23
2.22
0.13
0.26
0.25
5.12
0.91
1.12
1.15
7.52
3.24
6.77
3.70
1.63
1.91
3.35
2.00
1.88
1.06
1.40
1.12
3.29
0.42
1.10
0.61
4.80
3.41
7.26
3.75
4.85
4.74
6.68
4.88
0.81
1.89
2.68
1.89
3.50
3.75
3.87
3.75
BKI
1.87
1.54
1.28
0.53
0.20
0.55
2.18
0.13
0.29
0.25
4.54
0.87
1.01
1.07
5.75
3.92
4.26
4.04
2.67
3.13
2.92
3.09
1.74
1.09
1.34
1.14
2.10
0.33
0.45
0.43
3.12
3.43
3.67
3.43
4.68
4.28
5.62
4.40
0.87
1.69
2.25
1.69
3.77
3.69
4.10
3.72
C02 (g/m)
SMT
531.73
434.32
30.07
377.18
633.33
376.53
796.07
427.68
591.36
457.91
1057.26
621.47
954.93
667.77
1194.58
506.80
1269.70
594.72
960.70
419.91
881.15
478.64
739.44
445.89
678.75
476.73
1180.31
528.80
1213.62
609.37
891.39
497.47
1168.03
564.77
709.87
394.42
587.65
424.38
711.59
431.17
538.27
454.01
837.52
622.29
688.57
638.02
BKI
519.40
446.87
818.39
459.70
609.92
488.62
770.26
440.01
585.08
466.89
909.02
588.33
769.02
617.99
666.23
424.82
573.42
447.57
676.29
399.81
442.65
416.35
675.55
429.86
564.03
451.38
686.31
372.11
479.37
395.53
501.67
341.74
446.51
357.33
636.64
372.95
503.89
395.84
646.66
414.83
449.15
429.85
662.71
539.75
554.90
547.12
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.53
5.42
2.94
0.56
1.50
0.75
4.66
0.78
1.82
1.05
16.83
5.21
2.80
5.67
19.45
5.71
3.82
6.31
17.56
7.94
3.00
8.05
8.18
4.27
5.67
4.56
71.43
4.00
6.44
7.62
155.11
21.02
6.81
27.09
46.80
1.55
2.22
3.93
180.91
11.17
-0.49
19.60
199.52
242.74
125.74
232.12
Distance
(miles)
1.19
11.08
1.22
8.81
1.19
11.22
1.15
8.60
1.20
10.96
1.25
8.76
1.20
11.21
1.23
8.76
1.17
11.16
1.09
8.57
1.24
10.90
1.15
8.73
1.19
11.07
1.17
8.64
1.18
10.98
1.21
8.68
1.19
11.08
1.20
8.77
1.23
11.21
1.26
8.69
1.20
11.15
1.17
8.71
1.26
11.15
28
-------
RunID
84628
84628
84628
84628
84629
84629
84629
84629
84630
84630
84630
84630
84632
84632
84632
84632
84633
84633
84633
84633
84634
84634
84634
84634
84635
84635
84635
84635
84637
84637
84637
84637
84638
84638
84638
84638
84639
84639
84639
84639
84640
84640
84640
84640
84642
84642
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
6.66
0.12
0.05
0.46
5.32
0.16
0.04
0.40
11.41
0.75
0.25
1.28
95.50
35.98
57.42
40.53
5.88
1.20
0.80
1.42
8.61
0.53
2.65
1.10
8.25
1.22
2.30
1.67
26.33
2.83
3.37
4.13
5.72
1.11
1.70
1.39
3.86
0.13
0.52
0.35
2.97
0.10
0.43
0.27
5.23
0.34
BKI
6.63
0.06
0.06
0.41
6.03
0.13
0.04
0.40
12.54
0.54
0.20
1.14
31.43
13.26
27.71
15.16
5.14
1.10
0.65
1.29
9.62
0.48
2.07
1.06
8.35
1.06
2.08
1.51
21.72
2.69
3.50
3.78
5.78
1.01
1.55
1.29
3.99
0.09
0.43
0.32
3.06
0.08
0.39
0.26
5.57
0.25
CO (g/m)
SMT
50.17
2.33
2.75
4.92
61.44
4.12
0.67
6.58
225.28
21.21
5.82
30.95
289.21
102.24
56.74
108.94
141.42
63.14
13.28
63.89
89.41
7.52
17.98
12.48
110.37
14.13
14.17
19.13
527.52
48.44
39.64
73.58
73.85
21.47
22.91
24.27
62.67
3.00
7.55
6.37
35.85
7.58
14.17
9.53
172.83
13.50
BKI
51.28
2.11
1.91
4.74
68.37
4.01
0.44
6.78
225.01
19.64
3.87
29.30
227.16
83.83
36.39
88.15
120.40
59.25
8.42
59.03
86.27
7.03
13.02
11.56
94.56
12.16
10.53
16.34
438.92
49.11
36.09
69.22
70.18
20.25
17.83
22.69
61.95
2.17
4.52
5.41
30.10
6.41
10.42
7.92
160.46
11.43
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.84
0.30
0.25
0.32
1.55
0.12
0.12
0.19
0.54
0.46
1.03
0.50
3.11
3.57
6.24
3.73
1.73
1.17
2.43
1.29
4.56
3.65
4.70
3.77
3.48
1.35
1.28
1.45
1.87
4.14
5.02
4.08
2.90
1.18
1.17
1.27
2.26
0.58
1.22
0.71
3.30
1.20
1.03
1.30
1.83
1.54
BKI
0.87
0.28
0.24
0.31
1.49
0.10
0.10
0.17
0.67
0.47
0.89
0.51
3.23
3.49
5.90
3.63
1.69
1.12
2.20
1.23
3.99
2.99
4.43
3.14
3.68
1.42
1.36
1.53
1.40
3.98
4.57
3.89
2.96
1.25
1.29
1.34
2.22
0.62
1.26
0.75
3.23
1.21
1.18
1.32
1.91
1.47
C02 (g/m)
SMT
1032.95
533.72
767.50
576.61
765.56
406.67
536.47
432.73
505.54
382.62
542.21
400.17
776.72
637.13
863.28
659.57
685.05
403.19
629.00
433.92
772.92
443.79
635.43
473.99
779.87
453.77
601.50
481.67
577.17
443.87
607.07
462.42
817.57
437.21
610.36
468.83
543.98
337.34
479.50
357.61
932.59
495.62
672.51
531.04
595.88
402.35
BKI
990.97
545.81
723.54
582.37
731.11
399.03
492.35
421.14
476.63
358.74
452.28
371.43
632.48
555.86
673.25
567.58
542.73
374.56
496.36
392.32
698.27
440.67
585.95
464.05
733.45
447.08
550.24
469.67
514.47
454.28
567.15
465.32
771.69
445.23
582.65
471.90
484.65
313.92
389.68
327.89
877.25
497.82
627.16
526.67
549.83
378.73
PM2.5
(mg/m)
64.23
12.17
6.74
14.58
21.38
4.56
1.93
5.16
44.11
7.57
23.06
10.56
165.03
98.68
57.43
99.41
158.66
15.52
18.72
23.18
206.47
55.01
94.86
65.85
1654.02
65.06
15.25
146.94
13.86
2.00
1.39
2.57
7.97
1.44
1.75
1.80
0.00
36.66
4.06
Distance
(miles)
1.24
8.68
1.23
11.16
1.05
8.61
1.21
10.87
1.20
8.64
1.20
11.04
1.21
8.78
1.15
11.13
1.28
8.80
1.24
11.32
1.18
8.57
1.18
10.92
1.26
9.11
1.36
11.73
1.27
8.89
1.23
11.39
1.19
8.63
1.21
11.03
1.16
8.51
1.15
10.82
1.21
8.74
1.22
11.17
1.21
8.63
29
-------
RunID
84642
84642
84643
84643
84643
84643
84644
84644
84644
84644
84645
84645
84645
84645
84646
84646
84646
84646
84648
84648
84648
84648
84649
84649
84649
84649
84650
84650
84650
84650
84651
84651
84651
84651
84653
84653
84653
84653
84655
84655
84655
84655
84656
84656
84656
84656
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.47
0.60
10.12
1.51
2.08
1.98
2.95
0.07
0.04
0.23
7.58
0.07
0.19
0.48
6.95
0.46
1.07
0.84
7.05
0.74
1.27
1.11
13.35
0.17
0.79
0.91
8.01
0.20
1.47
0.69
9.77
2.55
4.16
3.03
18.19
4.93
7.18
5.79
3.88
0.14
0.78
0.38
6.62
0.12
0.72
0.50
BKI
0.32
0.54
10.40
1.32
1.93
1.81
3.02
0.05
0.03
0.21
7.98
0.05
0.17
0.48
6.07
0.37
0.89
0.70
7.08
0.71
1.38
1.09
11.55
0.10
0.48
0.73
7.32
0.16
1.29
0.60
9.58
2.30
3.66
2.77
15.05
3.11
5.34
3.91
4.16
0.13
0.77
0.39
5.76
0.09
0.69
0.43
CO (g/m)
SMT
15.00
22.01
176.30
26.09
21.21
33.33
24.80
2.04
2.39
3.30
79.86
0.94
3.21
5.28
142.28
13.07
16.20
19.91
75.60
17.70
31.87
21.77
127.95
2.71
9.65
9.82
137.75
5.48
18.59
13.19
101.18
19.61
32.27
24.70
471.03
64.39
111.37
89.24
30.28
2.98
7.84
4.75
103.25
4.33
13.75
10.14
BKI
9.12
19.15
161.76
23.26
15.91
29.75
26.62
1.83
1.87
3.17
75.85
0.73
2.14
4.82
116.08
10.30
10.01
15.70
69.45
18.64
29.78
22.08
93.66
1.98
5.40
7.07
117.17
4.84
14.61
11.24
82.64
17.09
23.05
20.88
424.59
49.43
77.11
71.68
29.73
3.12
6.82
4.79
77.32
3.70
10.43
7.96
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.44
1.55
2.19
2.81
2.76
2.78
1.81
0.30
0.23
0.38
0.84
0.41
0.74
0.46
1.98
1.30
2.41
1.42
2.56
1.84
1.28
1.84
2.21
0.71
0.92
0.81
3.95
1.31
2.29
1.51
5.13
4.41
5.90
4.55
1.85
6.06
5.66
5.81
4.65
1.05
1.59
1.28
3.35
1.07
2.30
1.28
BKI
1.38
1.49
2.19
2.67
2.51
2.63
1.62
0.29
0.25
0.36
1.13
0.42
0.73
0.48
1.97
1.29
2.46
1.41
2.94
1.68
1.17
1.71
1.98
0.63
0.73
0.71
4.09
1.35
2.20
1.55
5.48
4.50
5.65
4.63
2.00
5.29
5.17
5.10
4.66
1.05
1.58
1.28
3.58
1.11
2.22
1.31
C02 (g/m)
SMT
601.61
426.25
519.12
352.31
469.79
368.63
857.67
509.64
664.07
539.31
740.25
419.43
594.85
448.69
636.11
418.27
537.75
437.79
825.05
503.19
654.29
530.95
917.93
526.31
743.76
562.10
770.78
452.02
648.79
481.95
766.92
407.49
599.09
439.31
927.10
715.27
875.32
737.72
860.07
449.09
644.25
484.11
777.61
421.31
597.50
452.44
BKI
466.65
393.81
467.52
330.86
390.90
341.79
784.30
506.34
607.94
528.40
691.16
414.38
545.17
438.10
507.63
357.05
419.88
369.17
750.31
494.91
594.15
515.29
660.42
445.29
541.82
463.40
686.16
434.87
553.00
455.82
691.08
388.32
513.51
412.64
827.81
675.31
742.87
688.25
794.85
443.65
589.76
472.30
658.59
405.04
518.71
426.19
PM2.5
(mg/m)
4.00
5.78
459.38
136.54
35.88
146.04
16.88
4.55
2.12
5.05
23.98
5.66
1.74
6.37
15.14
6.00
3.13
6.27
43.39
39.18
6.85
37.11
26.99
5.61
2.06
6.49
33.90
6.46
3.21
7.63
71.62
4.27
5.51
7.82
595.95
89.23
14.56
111.61
20.72
4.73
1.48
5.35
26.59
7.12
3.26
7.84
Distance
(miles)
1.18
11.02
1.13
8.48
1.14
10.75
1.26
8.77
1.22
11.24
1.23
8.70
1.19
11.12
1.16
8.59
1.21
10.95
1.21
8.73
1.24
11.17
1.21
8.65
1.21
11.07
1.18
8.76
1.20
11.15
1.18
8.67
1.20
11.06
1.25
8.69
1.20
11.15
1.22
8.66
1.19
11.07
1.17
8.62
1.24
11.03
30
-------
RunID
84658
84658
84658
84658
84659
84659
84659
84659
84660
84660
84660
84660
84661
84661
84661
84661
84662
84662
84662
84662
84663
84663
84663
84663
84665
84665
84665
84665
84666
84666
84666
84666
84667
84667
84667
84667
84668
84668
84668
84668
84669
84669
84669
84669
84670
84670
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
5.40
0.55
0.85
0.85
9.71
2.71
1.53
2.98
8.85
0.81
2.55
1.34
3.47
0.09
0.92
0.32
14.31
1.69
3.65
2.49
6.03
0.76
2.16
1.13
7.68
0.19
0.52
0.61
9.39
0.48
1.59
1.04
23.02
6.33
15.11
7.77
2.49
0.04
0.21
0.17
8.99
0.83
0.90
1.25
6.09
0.44
BKI
5.92
0.52
0.88
0.86
8.90
1.36
1.28
1.73
9.61
0.70
2.40
1.27
3.40
0.06
0.78
0.29
14.25
1.35
3.16
2.17
5.87
0.56
1.63
0.91
7.95
0.13
0.49
0.58
10.59
0.42
1.77
1.07
21.24
5.55
13.56
6.88
2.43
0.03
0.18
0.17
10.41
0.51
0.67
1.03
6.75
0.34
CO (g/m)
SMT
99.31
6.83
8.52
12.34
181.32
29.98
19.30
36.83
51.84
5.22
14.19
8.20
33.72
2.41
11.72
4.71
388.31
26.38
32.41
45.92
93.38
12.60
14.52
16.97
157.71
4.38
9.68
12.99
181.08
1.95
13.75
12.48
189.01
57.10
134.70
69.05
18.02
1.31
2.69
2.26
221.73
12.15
21.20
23.53
122.00
9.64
BKI
98.33
5.67
7.17
11.18
167.06
24.59
14.75
31.08
48.80
4.44
10.33
7.09
26.81
1.92
8.18
3.67
356.11
23.49
24.91
41.43
82.67
8.80
7.95
12.60
151.10
3.87
7.27
12.07
183.35
1.86
12.93
12.56
150.71
56.99
115.15
65.68
16.09
1.10
1.71
1.92
220.93
9.11
13.74
20.32
122.11
8.26
NOx (g/m)
SMT
4.04
2.83
4.35
3.00
3.16
3.03
2.35
2.99
4.39
2.69
3.78
2.85
4.09
1.10
1.82
1.31
1.98
5.32
7.94
5.32
2.28
1.48
2.20
1.57
2.79
2.80
3.56
2.86
3.10
2.90
2.10
2.85
2.64
3.36
2.63
3.27
3.78
1.31
1.58
1.46
1.78
2.64
2.11
2.56
2.01
1.13
BKI
4.02
2.69
3.91
2.85
3.37
2.71
2.34
2.72
4.74
2.80
4.26
3.00
4.21
1.13
1.76
1.34
2.21
5.00
7.22
5.01
2.33
1.52
1.99
1.60
2.83
2.74
3.36
2.79
3.43
2.91
2.22
2.89
2.88
3.34
2.82
3.29
3.63
1.22
1.42
1.36
2.01
2.77
2.39
2.70
1.94
1.16
C02 (g/m)
SMT
584.81
379.61
519.42
401.29
643.05
409.89
637.36
437.14
724.09
442.51
582.53
466.47
776.47
417.05
603.69
448.87
786.02
527.26
779.37
558.34
679.69
414.57
605.53
441.54
923.47
511.27
667.57
544.58
905.29
557.76
761.15
590.71
971.73
605.79
733.73
632.92
884.02
450.90
656.15
487.41
563.11
409.18
550.73
426.87
632.65
404.00
BKI
541.68
363.62
471.08
381.53
572.30
401.52
555.71
420.67
684.11
438.16
539.93
457.67
707.21
403.95
525.81
428.46
724.97
496.81
658.46
520.33
568.80
360.32
434.18
376.29
785.62
482.71
572.57
505.47
888.81
571.10
739.51
600.24
801.11
592.25
627.70
605.14
795.54
429.65
585.70
459.26
521.27
384.34
467.96
397.18
556.34
372.57
PM2.5
(mg/m)
92.75
1.30
1.57
6.65
66.92
12.81
12.87
15.53
717.53
127.94
119.92
157.13
20.70
3.17
2.83
4.07
57.88
17.84
4.76
19.07
63.57
19.97
19.72
22.22
65.48
7.22
2.69
10.04
44.48
11.30
6.41
12.77
76.53
9.29
5.60
12.39
14.91
1.75
1.98
2.45
170.39
20.56
4.91
27.15
28.83
10.04
Distance
(miles)
1.46
9.29
1.30
12.05
1.15
8.67
1.18
11.00
1.15
8.64
1.21
10.99
1.23
8.75
1.21
11.18
1.23
8.65
1.21
11.09
1.20
8.70
1.19
11.10
1.26
8.78
1.25
11.29
1.28
8.74
1.22
11.24
1.14
8.68
1.19
11.02
1.19
8.70
1.19
11.08
1.18
8.70
1.21
11.09
1.19
8.63
-------
RunID
84670
84670
84672
84672
84672
84672
84673
84673
84673
84673
84674
84674
84674
84674
84675
84675
84675
84675
84676
84676
84676
84676
84677
84677
84677
84677
84679
84679
84679
84679
84680
84680
84680
84680
84681
84681
84681
84681
84682
84682
84682
84682
84683
84683
84683
84683
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.67
0.76
4.74
0.17
0.32
0.42
36.22
12.07
2.36
12.67
11.46
2.63
4.09
3.19
3.63
0.12
0.50
0.33
8.92
0.50
0.77
0.99
2.95
0.10
0.47
0.28
12.17
0.80
1.25
1.42
167.51
45.99
69.49
53.89
2.95
0.12
0.50
0.29
10.57
1.70
3.94
2.30
5.12
0.76
3.18
1.18
BKI
0.60
0.70
4.94
0.15
0.30
0.41
21.42
5.88
2.52
6.47
8.97
2.04
3.26
2.49
4.09
0.10
0.54
0.34
8.70
0.41
0.72
0.89
3.00
0.10
0.43
0.27
11.74
0.59
1.07
1.20
30.97
15.39
26.29
16.94
3.61
0.09
0.52
0.31
13.14
1.62
4.38
2.39
5.71
0.61
2.86
1.04
CO (g/m)
SMT
8.32
15.52
42.04
5.25
3.57
7.05
660.09
303.38
58.30
305.06
227.56
36.46
64.05
48.33
46.55
2.59
4.68
5.00
174.08
9.85
12.65
19.21
30.85
2.93
5.24
4.52
110.30
14.04
8.58
18.60
679.36
115.69
172.66
148.84
40.23
1.83
4.19
4.02
205.52
29.05
153.23
46.58
74.15
11.24
17.41
15.28
BKI
6.73
14.10
35.50
4.45
2.02
5.91
483.62
209.21
57.64
213.11
181.82
33.78
45.88
42.38
53.60
2.11
3.45
4.86
156.43
9.62
8.42
17.58
27.89
2.77
3.88
4.14
90.22
10.71
5.33
14.41
464.14
91.68
96.87
111.35
49.37
1.46
3.10
4.09
219.76
28.22
149.63
46.27
73.86
9.05
13.60
12.86
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.88
1.22
1.19
0.87
0.84
0.88
0.76
2.83
1.57
2.63
2.82
2.52
2.94
2.56
3.42
1.77
2.13
1.88
1.72
2.22
1.86
2.16
2.70
0.49
0.98
0.64
2.03
1.23
1.80
1.31
3.14
1.71
2.26
1.82
3.58
1.77
2.10
1.88
0.64
0.96
0.21
0.90
3.20
2.61
4.02
2.74
BKI
1.80
1.25
1.32
0.89
0.88
0.91
0.44
0.60
1.47
0.65
2.93
2.65
3.06
2.70
3.62
1.87
2.32
1.99
2.14
2.33
1.91
2.29
2.69
0.46
0.85
0.60
2.31
1.28
1.67
1.36
0.28
2.45
2.40
2.34
4.14
2.02
2.24
2.15
0.76
0.96
0.23
0.90
4.14
2.69
4.13
2.87
C02 (g/m)
SMT
578.96
428.30
453.51
278.13
385.78
294.79
994.63
664.26
972.15
703.78
930.10
504.89
764.44
545.13
603.95
380.96
498.07
400.47
661.31
522.95
653.30
540.03
813.18
446.53
639.55
478.77
561.96
369.01
534.65
390.69
724.79
607.51
502.26
606.50
591.01
386.50
514.53
406.11
695.72
414.53
443.15
430.75
563.63
408.17
503.21
423.70
BKI
462.87
388.45
383.35
256.27
299.32
265.97
891.61
644.25
880.18
674.27
807.66
471.11
642.79
500.75
581.54
378.41
480.49
395.88
634.56
501.75
564.47
513.65
739.59
422.91
563.08
448.88
451.46
331.12
392.73
341.77
518.69
525.02
565.88
527.49
598.49
383.57
480.19
401.57
688.57
422.17
431.45
436.33
597.00
388.12
462.87
404.59
PM2.5
(mg/m)
3.51
10.56
14.98
4.29
5.15
4.91
1437.93
0.00
97.74
83.99
48.46
6.73
7.65
8.98
8.21
4.12
0.94
4.11
25.59
8.25
2.53
8.78
14.36
1.47
-0.02
2.03
72.75
4.34
4.45
7.87
1199.80
398.09
67.13
417.10
64.47
18.69
5.40
20.09
14.39
9.07
6.53
9.18
Distance
(miles)
1.20
11.02
1.19
8.55
1.21
10.95
1.19
8.34
1.19
10.72
1.20
8.62
1.21
11.02
1.17
8.59
1.17
10.93
1.32
9.07
1.35
11.74
1.18
8.69
1.20
11.07
1.20
8.80
1.28
11.27
1.21
8.80
1.20
11.20
1.21
8.69
1.21
11.11
1.15
8.61
1.18
10.94
1.24
8.66
1.20
11.11
32
-------
RunID
84685
84685
84685
84685
84686
84686
84686
84686
84687
84687
84687
84687
84688
84688
84688
84688
84689
84689
84689
84689
84690
84690
84690
84690
84692
84692
84692
84692
84693
84693
84693
84693
84694
84694
84694
84694
84695
84695
84695
84695
84696
84696
84696
84696
84697
84697
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
9.31
0.94
5.57
1.69
63.20
3.10
5.37
6.62
21.99
1.17
1.75
2.33
4.55
0.16
0.60
0.42
2.37
0.11
0.42
0.26
4.23
0.41
1.69
0.70
8.77
6.86
8.07
7.05
8.41
0.58
1.56
1.06
28.22
1.59
1.67
2.91
3.91
0.42
1.81
0.71
17.85
5.47
6.36
6.17
2.26
1.19
BKI
7.58
0.58
4.50
1.21
19.83
2.12
4.39
3.27
17.34
0.97
1.56
1.90
4.54
0.14
0.66
0.41
2.56
0.11
0.44
0.26
5.09
0.33
1.78
0.68
9.61
7.36
9.36
7.62
8.99
0.48
1.66
1.00
20.46
0.95
1.11
1.91
4.70
0.29
1.84
0.63
13.95
3.06
4.68
3.73
8.23
2.41
CO (g/m)
SMT
108.31
0.55
16.35
7.12
347.95
6.16
16.85
26.05
491.79
26.17
32.76
51.55
68.63
3.27
4.69
6.86
40.08
5.03
10.04
7.26
58.78
6.56
16.03
9.95
148.10
160.52
181.83
161.33
174.35
7.54
15.32
16.73
260.99
15.81
16.16
27.93
52.61
5.97
14.98
9.06
141.65
25.38
27.93
31.60
101.79
22.34
BKI
85.68
0.27
12.78
5.50
239.44
4.71
11.84
18.29
410.84
22.88
25.25
43.90
64.76
3.14
3.73
6.47
36.04
4.78
8.58
6.72
62.07
5.72
15.07
9.29
127.49
159.67
174.43
158.99
157.11
7.31
13.22
15.58
180.97
12.60
10.78
20.69
52.93
4.29
11.69
7.38
117.44
20.10
21.19
25.23
73.10
17.52
NOx (g/m)
SMT
5.67
1.60
1.87
1.83
2.07
4.77
4.54
4.61
0.37
1.69
2.12
1.65
1.94
1.19
2.24
1.30
3.17
0.51
0.74
0.67
3.82
0.83
1.64
1.05
2.13
0.11
0.17
0.22
2.50
1.79
1.78
1.83
2.86
5.18
5.82
5.11
3.68
0.78
1.64
1.00
3.38
3.34
3.47
3.35
5.89
4.67
BKI
5.61
1.68
1.96
1.90
2.07
4.04
3.57
3.90
0.65
1.61
1.93
1.58
1.91
1.17
2.13
1.28
3.04
0.52
0.71
0.67
4.27
1.03
1.97
1.26
2.72
0.11
0.33
0.26
2.71
1.86
1.93
1.91
2.65
4.50
4.81
4.43
4.09
0.98
1.86
1.20
3.85
3.60
3.46
3.60
5.96
4.78
C02 (g/m)
SMT
1000.80
608.79
792.37
641.39
681.01
511.44
740.82
537.08
987.71
645.94
884.30
681.37
800.15
462.20
614.17
490.93
591.27
302.39
438.99
327.55
621.87
352.24
438.94
372.43
600.00
267.37
355.00
290.43
806.29
528.55
747.64
557.86
1054.62
550.83
843.20
596.16
634.69
364.56
458.59
385.47
767.71
452.99
517.76
473.70
815.75
458.85
BKI
877.61
579.10
715.07
603.75
487.70
426.94
558.12
439.63
841.38
599.90
735.29
622.69
695.22
436.74
560.54
459.18
512.62
289.16
389.13
308.20
620.34
358.13
452.21
378.31
591.79
260.90
357.29
284.65
731.22
520.10
697.83
543.17
733.92
467.53
641.76
492.64
641.19
370.04
459.82
390.72
605.06
376.68
414.95
391.13
670.52
391.96
PM2.5
(mg/m)
11.51
73.90
5.80
66.01
282.24
12.38
10.98
27.30
332.42
16.50
3.39
32.52
14.51
10.56
4.66
10.36
35.13
0.59
0.39
2.43
7.02
1.69
2.26
2.00
12.12
20.25
9.71
19.12
15.70
5.30
2.44
5.66
252.00
15.93
5.16
26.68
6.84
1.86
1.84
2.12
372.17
35.71
14.43
51.72
35.40
3.14
Distance
(miles)
1.17
8.68
1.20
11.05
1.32
8.86
1.26
11.44
1.25
8.75
1.27
11.27
1.23
8.67
1.21
11.11
1.25
8.77
1.25
11.26
1.19
8.73
1.23
11.15
1.17
8.51
1.14
10.83
1.21
8.65
1.16
11.02
1.12
8.75
1.22
11.09
1.21
8.73
1.26
11.20
1.20
8.73
1.17
11.10
1.21
8.66
33
-------
RunID
84697
84697
84699
84699
84699
84699
84700
84700
84700
84700
84701
84701
84701
84701
84702
84702
84702
84702
84703
84703
84703
84703
84705
84705
84705
84705
84707
84707
84707
84707
84708
84708
84708
84708
84709
84709
84709
84709
84710
84710
84710
84710
84712
84712
84712
84712
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.73
1.28
86.34
5.08
7.38
8.22
23.96
7.19
9.10
8.22
3.64
0.26
1.23
0.51
8.27
0.93
1.95
1.38
7.86
0.81
1.54
1.23
8.96
1.85
4.14
2.37
46.15
2.87
3.51
4.63
1.22
0.03
0.05
0.10
9.46
1.01
1.66
1.49
34.43
0.48
0.54
2.33
95.00
8.31
6.85
12.63
BKI
3.91
2.82
31.47
4.01
6.08
5.18
14.53
5.51
7.13
6.11
3.71
0.23
1.27
0.49
8.24
0.83
1.58
1.27
7.48
0.68
1.37
1.09
9.32
1.73
3.60
2.25
21.04
1.87
3.12
2.75
1.24
0.03
0.05
0.10
8.39
0.68
1.25
1.12
18.16
0.31
0.51
1.29
30.70
4.93
6.17
6.36
CO (g/m)
SMT
37.67
27.62
268.94
65.72
113.53
76.51
253.82
66.87
84.89
78.09
51.42
0.53
8.33
3.85
121.19
9.37
13.97
15.46
163.53
22.39
22.07
29.87
173.90
64.53
91.40
72.01
251.01
36.08
44.84
45.21
16.89
0.39
0.90
1.28
141.94
15.47
12.58
21.79
320.35
5.09
5.88
22.28
362.00
65.69
54.78
80.06
BKI
24.26
20.92
222.75
54.05
75.82
61.85
178.08
59.49
55.85
65.54
43.10
0.64
6.69
3.39
109.01
7.29
7.66
12.60
135.44
20.43
17.34
26.32
158.69
69.64
87.73
75.48
199.76
31.20
36.06
38.52
16.84
0.23
0.54
1.11
123.39
12.51
8.69
18.00
311.27
4.53
5.63
21.31
282.05
65.61
47.15
75.65
NOx (g/m)
SMT
6.25
4.85
2.50
1.96
2.68
2.03
2.39
3.29
4.37
3.31
4.14
1.88
2.92
2.07
6.30
1.30
2.16
1.61
8.53
5.26
8.88
5.69
1.85
0.70
0.74
0.76
1.96
1.93
2.32
1.95
1.33
0.51
0.43
0.55
1.71
1.29
1.45
1.32
0.39
0.64
0.55
0.62
0.85
1.79
2.45
1.79
BKI
5.88
4.92
3.00
2.45
2.57
2.48
2.36
3.40
3.91
3.38
4.43
2.00
3.06
2.21
6.27
1.38
2.12
1.69
7.56
4.98
7.96
5.33
1.88
0.73
0.70
0.78
2.24
2.08
2.26
2.10
1.14
0.49
0.31
0.51
1.72
1.30
1.36
1.33
0.53
0.68
0.47
0.66
0.95
2.14
2.35
2.09
C02 (g/m)
SMT
654.52
491.50
1366.88
507.50
817.42
560.64
1195.56
618.27
916.39
669.95
693.03
372.74
511.32
399.99
1067.73
608.48
923.65
653.84
869.76
494.70
686.67
528.25
771.56
470.20
623.87
496.27
1508.67
665.57
876.03
713.34
802.18
453.55
647.63
485.14
575.53
409.26
596.09
430.60
515.43
393.53
598.26
414.17
596.39
391.85
549.26
413.05
BKI
516.64
415.37
1082.48
482.88
614.02
514.41
956.32
583.58
719.53
613.09
632.37
372.62
476.61
394.25
935.84
558.11
699.45
587.59
755.44
484.06
590.00
505.96
730.49
466.84
554.95
486.48
1205.81
637.28
764.51
669.72
763.79
433.13
587.31
460.99
469.85
355.10
415.00
365.17
465.44
398.82
544.44
412.37
472.23
385.02
493.08
396.93
PM2.5
(mg/m)
4.33
4.92
1039.01
124.74
116.94
158.21
57.97
73.83
17.43
68.99
12.52
12.07
5.05
11.59
108.38
3.07
3.18
8.53
37.38
10.31
2.38
11.19
123.22
23.15
7.34
27.23
284.48
72.45
26.93
78.06
44.84
9.64
5.74
11.19
15.16
2.78
1.94
3.37
641.87
5.32
4.45
39.89
354.72
13.72
6.82
30.98
Distance
(miles)
1.22
11.09
0.83
8.75
1.24
10.81
1.22
8.65
1.23
11.10
1.32
9.06
1.30
11.69
1.19
8.68
1.21
11.09
1.24
8.77
1.24
11.24
1.18
8.65
1.17
11.01
0.94
8.79
1.23
10.96
1.19
8.67
1.20
11.07
1.19
8.65
1.19
11.02
1.26
8.68
1.18
11.12
1.18
8.56
1.16
10.91
34
-------
RunID
84713
84713
84713
84713
84714
84714
84714
84714
84715
84715
84715
84715
84719
84719
84719
84719
84720
84720
84720
84720
84722
84722
84722
84722
84723
84723
84723
84723
84724
84724
84724
84724
84726
84726
84726
84726
84727
84727
84727
84727
84728
84728
84728
84728
84729
84729
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
2.93
0.26
0.48
0.41
2.31
0.25
0.13
0.35
17.68
1.62
1.27
2.46
4.79
0.12
1.13
0.43
12.20
1.46
1.94
2.05
3.26
0.04
0.10
0.21
6.26
2.08
3.49
2.40
7.12
0.29
1.76
0.76
6.01
0.39
1.14
0.73
4.33
0.42
2.88
0.80
2.26
0.04
0.02
0.16
2.37
0.07
BKI
2.81
0.21
0.40
0.36
3.21
0.19
0.11
0.34
19.56
1.10
1.10
2.08
4.17
0.07
0.74
0.32
11.80
1.24
1.71
1.81
2.79
0.03
0.08
0.18
5.29
1.69
2.55
1.95
5.50
0.17
1.16
0.52
4.60
0.34
0.92
0.59
3.79
0.46
2.41
0.77
2.11
0.04
0.02
0.14
2.47
0.06
CO (g/m)
SMT
31.51
5.89
7.60
7.34
25.28
3.99
2.06
4.99
229.62
29.81
13.67
39.40
74.93
4.00
16.80
8.49
144.11
12.67
11.08
19.36
32.94
0.72
2.15
2.50
100.46
13.47
25.54
18.95
72.02
4.75
12.50
8.91
95.30
14.42
18.75
18.88
46.41
8.86
51.51
13.76
10.84
0.42
0.36
0.95
6.17
3.13
BKI
27.77
4.92
5.51
6.16
33.58
3.83
1.50
5.23
225.19
28.78
10.55
37.92
64.11
3.33
10.36
6.92
128.79
11.93
7.67
17.63
29.05
0.62
1.41
2.15
83.10
10.27
15.22
14.48
52.74
3.48
7.20
6.40
67.25
13.02
12.15
15.75
37.64
9.50
53.57
13.98
8.73
0.23
0.21
0.67
5.99
2.89
NOx (g/m)
SMT
3.02
0.45
0.19
0.57
1.32
0.15
0.31
0.22
0.57
1.64
1.93
1.61
4.13
0.90
1.31
1.09
7.01
2.75
2.57
2.95
2.60
1.63
1.72
1.69
3.85
3.18
4.81
3.33
2.36
1.34
2.60
1.48
2.89
1.33
2.44
1.49
2.23
1.03
1.21
1.11
0.67
0.05
0.09
0.09
0.81
0.26
BKI
3.21
0.48
0.25
0.60
1.93
0.17
0.32
0.27
0.95
1.79
1.99
1.76
4.35
0.92
1.34
1.12
7.01
2.78
2.41
2.97
2.25
1.42
1.27
1.45
4.39
3.60
4.58
3.71
2.65
1.36
2.43
1.51
3.15
1.26
2.20
1.42
2.35
1.05
1.27
1.14
0.99
0.09
0.11
0.14
0.96
0.25
C02 (g/m)
SMT
898.15
475.74
686.57
512.17
454.49
302.52
421.45
318.77
488.88
374.50
510.70
390.35
886.61
450.05
709.14
489.94
997.72
653.41
848.27
685.23
965.16
487.45
750.82
530.69
616.27
371.63
599.18
400.78
821.23
439.02
700.33
477.91
931.16
500.95
769.46
541.37
884.55
503.37
574.17
528.49
839.36
427.93
670.24
466.10
653.47
291.03
BKI
828.73
480.23
626.28
508.62
503.13
286.39
353.94
302.51
435.97
351.50
423.01
361.07
726.34
410.10
528.14
434.34
896.73
595.09
651.64
614.65
823.77
470.93
601.14
498.32
530.38
336.11
442.16
353.94
624.00
388.16
495.53
408.42
744.39
428.46
555.40
453.30
804.29
492.82
517.91
511.19
758.48
415.46
567.66
443.83
721.70
362.55
PM2.5
(mg/m)
6.81
2.22
2.00
2.45
82.13
6.69
3.84
10.46
517.55
35.20
13.33
59.26
8.09
0.82
1.53
1.24
94.36
5.33
0.93
9.57
20.36
1.94
1.58
2.87
40.62
9.87
3.55
11.05
21.98
3.38
2.37
4.31
12.66
2.43
1.07
2.86
29.59
37.41
4.54
34.79
27.03
4.86
3.34
5.89
6.97
1.89
Distance
(miles)
1.20
8.67
1.20
11.07
1.20
8.66
1.22
11.08
1.23
8.71
1.24
11.18
1.16
8.60
1.17
10.93
1.19
8.81
1.27
11.27
1.20
8.70
1.21
11.11
1.23
8.72
1.24
11.19
1.25
8.71
1.23
11.19
1.17
8.60
1.16
10.93
1.23
8.67
1.16
11.07
1.18
8.68
1.22
11.08
1.16
8.67
35
-------
RunID
84729
84729
84730
84730
84730
84730
84732
84732
84732
84732
84733
84733
84733
84733
84734
84734
84734
84734
84737
84737
84737
84737
84738
84738
84738
84738
84739
84739
84739
84739
84740
84740
84740
84740
84741
84741
84741
84741
84743
84743
84743
84743
84745
84745
84745
84745
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.04
0.18
6.71
0.82
4.69
1.40
18.04
4.00
5.98
4.86
3.59
0.09
0.22
0.28
6.30
0.31
0.66
0.65
1.96
0.16
0.20
0.25
16.03
4.78
6.47
5.53
4.69
0.28
0.36
0.51
3.21
0.46
1.50
0.68
8.69
2.92
4.32
3.32
1.46
0.11
4.52
0.48
0.78
0.72
BKI
0.04
0.18
6.44
0.51
3.64
1.04
11.55
3.20
4.80
3.75
3.49
0.07
0.19
0.25
5.53
0.29
0.64
0.58
2.47
0.13
0.16
0.26
14.49
3.94
5.02
4.62
5.76
0.24
0.29
0.53
3.01
0.37
1.27
0.57
7.92
2.39
3.70
2.77
2.37
0.07
0.20
0.20
5.18
0.38
0.70
0.66
CO (g/m)
SMT
0.35
3.09
89.34
7.18
31.65
13.25
172.13
75.62
129.58
84.37
33.63
0.53
2.44
2.39
32.27
7.10
8.36
8.48
24.24
10.48
3.48
10.72
399.83
140.71
197.91
159.32
26.04
6.98
7.43
7.99
27.15
8.33
17.10
9.94
85.84
20.09
31.00
24.33
16.66
4.66
68.96
11.86
14.33
15.11
BKI
0.18
2.86
80.46
4.62
20.33
9.79
119.00
64.53
91.74
69.27
32.84
0.41
2.17
2.20
24.98
7.00
6.20
7.86
25.71
10.32
2.20
10.58
370.05
130.96
140.80
145.23
29.90
6.63
4.78
7.71
22.16
6.85
13.36
8.11
62.04
15.78
21.66
18.62
23.74
4.23
6.43
5.39
66.27
9.38
10.31
12.51
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.25
0.29
2.88
0.45
0.57
0.59
3.90
4.07
3.45
4.02
2.54
0.50
1.46
0.67
2.99
1.45
2.16
1.58
1.58
0.86
1.33
0.93
0.79
1.78
2.95
1.81
1.64
0.63
0.63
0.68
4.02
0.67
0.64
0.85
5.44
4.63
6.21
4.79
1.71
0.76
2.01
1.95
2.52
2.00
BKI
0.22
0.29
2.93
0.44
0.51
0.58
5.00
4.62
3.93
4.59
2.63
0.48
1.17
0.64
3.26
1.48
2.06
1.61
1.86
0.81
1.24
0.89
1.27
2.17
2.96
2.17
2.12
0.71
0.63
0.78
3.98
0.69
0.68
0.86
5.69
4.75
5.95
4.88
2.36
1.00
1.23
1.09
2.47
1.91
2.33
1.97
C02 (g/m)
SMT
429.51
319.05
851.10
499.83
741.73
535.18
715.45
454.61
628.07
480.18
748.22
456.25
605.13
481.69
853.28
461.28
693.79
497.26
591.45
397.25
570.49
419.50
938.26
608.56
976.90
652.37
496.71
278.70
499.38
305.08
945.29
495.28
687.95
532.50
740.86
440.52
619.51
469.02
347.33
263.25
401.11
284.15
394.12
298.20
BKI
459.01
387.32
701.89
456.33
595.97
479.25
589.75
427.61
497.79
440.96
706.12
427.06
551.56
449.98
713.17
432.71
587.36
457.62
617.43
356.75
466.95
378.23
881.36
584.36
779.96
614.61
548.22
332.52
435.46
350.72
827.77
460.19
591.67
488.72
627.60
384.35
511.17
406.04
431.91
283.02
346.65
295.12
418.16
264.16
336.59
277.54
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.63
2.13
31.97
4.48
13.22
6.57
13.29
7.38
8.63
7.78
5.86
1.19
1.34
1.44
22.96
2.66
1.38
3.61
35.05
9.04
4.39
10.10
69.84
12.51
4.66
15.24
104.99
19.25
7.14
22.84
28.59
5.64
3.60
6.71
38.55
2.71
3.11
4.61
11.45
0.58
1.20
1.19
110.69
12.00
2.22
16.61
Distance
(miles)
1.18
11.01
1.25
8.72
1.21
11.18
1.19
8.56
1.18
10.93
1.18
8.66
1.18
11.03
1.16
8.58
1.17
10.91
1.23
8.74
1.21
11.18
1.37
8.98
1.22
11.57
1.18
8.64
1.18
11.00
1.22
8.72
1.22
11.15
1.21
8.71
1.23
11.16
1.18
8.60
1.18
10.96
1.25
8.75
1.23
11.24
36
-------
RunID
84747
84747
84747
84747
84748
84748
84748
84748
84749
84749
84749
84749
84751
84751
84751
84751
84752
84752
84752
84752
84753
84753
84753
84753
84754
84754
84754
84754
84755
84755
84755
84755
84757
84757
84757
84757
84758
84758
84758
84758
84759
84759
84759
84759
84760
84760
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.07
0.02
0.31
0.08
1.14
0.04
0.10
0.10
2.11
0.03
0.18
0.15
1.12
0.11
0.08
0.16
2.09
0.28
0.81
0.41
1.67
0.05
0.06
0.14
1.02
0.02
0.03
0.08
1.52
0.02
0.04
0.10
1.33
0.12
0.17
0.18
10.41
3.25
2.80
3.59
0.22
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.71
0.06
BKI
1.00
-0.02
-8.34
0.03
1.09
0.04
0.10
0.10
1.97
0.02
0.16
0.13
1.00
0.11
0.09
0.16
2.65
0.30
0.77
0.45
1.68
0.04
0.06
0.13
1.04
0.02
0.03
0.08
1.43
0.02
0.03
0.10
1.37
0.12
0.18
0.19
10.07
2.83
2.48
3.19
0.22
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.80
0.06
CO (g/m)
SMT
12.11
0.67
4.08
1.27
9.93
1.93
4.00
2.49
20.33
1.27
3.77
2.43
10.75
6.71
3.86
6.72
6.82
2.61
2.20
2.80
10.32
0.85
1.04
1.36
6.66
0.41
0.87
0.78
15.77
1.69
1.96
2.45
10.50
1.48
1.81
1.98
129.11
52.24
32.93
54.92
0.82
1.30
0.33
1.21
2.31
1.25
BKI
6.64
-1.08
-333.19
-0.93
7.56
1.41
3.12
1.85
14.08
0.85
2.33
1.64
8.98
6.00
3.13
5.96
6.27
2.43
1.51
2.57
8.80
0.62
0.54
1.04
5.87
0.19
0.36
0.51
14.25
1.78
1.08
2.40
8.65
1.14
0.87
1.52
109.31
52.08
30.14
53.57
0.71
1.10
0.17
1.02
2.13
1.05
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.24
0.39
0.03
0.49
2.85
0.62
0.55
0.73
1.34
0.16
0.56
0.25
1.76
1.12
0.96
1.14
1.85
1.51
1.89
1.56
1.58
0.15
0.08
0.22
1.74
0.28
0.22
0.36
0.44
0.13
0.10
0.14
1.25
0.44
0.50
0.49
4.91
1.17
1.39
1.38
0.11
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.19
0.05
BKI
2.00
0.40
-3.86
0.48
2.49
0.66
0.53
0.75
1.41
0.17
0.46
0.25
1.90
1.29
1.11
1.31
1.82
1.48
1.81
1.52
1.46
0.14
0.06
0.20
1.55
0.28
0.16
0.34
0.41
0.11
0.09
0.12
1.24
0.42
0.46
0.46
5.35
1.33
1.22
1.53
0.09
0.03
0.01
0.03
0.21
0.05
C02 (g/m)
SMT
882.35
494.00
5577.02
519.53
912.01
497.14
745.92
535.67
818.27
436.06
644.49
470.47
531.60
290.88
362.84
308.51
392.48
239.56
328.10
253.43
799.20
486.89
735.95
520.58
772.98
482.12
747.67
516.47
943.18
472.27
648.58
509.45
938.49
488.84
767.94
531.78
1002.75
625.18
912.19
665.06
566.14
330.57
453.35
351.05
805.89
446.82
BKI
598.43
382.97
-14533.98
382.85
791.43
461.55
625.10
489.93
712.75
405.11
521.45
429.24
513.45
316.54
391.37
332.03
367.02
235.52
291.01
246.05
730.61
460.63
615.04
485.51
697.19
458.78
590.66
481.02
846.16
473.26
597.32
501.79
832.04
466.33
644.68
498.01
928.79
597.05
734.74
624.18
594.77
340.74
400.06
357.69
743.64
429.22
PM2.5
(mg/m)
10.97
4.03
7.60
1.29
1.27
1.62
3.69
0.86
2.56
1.13
0.73
3.24
0.56
2.92
4.91
6.78
2.34
6.38
21.47
5.53
2.47
6.15
11.21
3.06
1.24
3.38
3.97
3.04
0.05
2.88
4.42
1.93
1.31
2.02
101.02
12.86
0.89
16.66
2.82
0.71
0.30
0.79
3.87
1.31
Distance
(miles)
1.21
8.69
0.01
9.91
1.20
8.67
1.18
11.05
1.19
8.65
1.21
11.05
1.20
8.65
1.20
11.05
1.19
8.74
1.18
11.10
1.20
8.65
1.21
11.05
1.25
8.58
1.20
11.03
1.24
8.75
1.23
11.21
1.22
8.69
1.20
11.11
1.20
8.59
1.20
10.99
1.12
8.45
1.19
10.75
1.16
8.52
37
-------
RunID
84760
84760
84761
84761
84761
84761
84763
84763
84763
84763
84765
84765
84765
84765
84766
84766
84766
84766
84767
84767
84767
84767
84768
84768
84768
84768
84770
84770
84770
84770
84771
84771
84771
84771
84772
84772
84772
84772
84773
84773
84773
84773
84774
84774
84774
84774
Phase
o
6
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
1
2
o
5
A
1
2
o
6
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.01
0.09
1.17
0.02
0.07
0.08
1.92
0.04
0.03
0.13
23.92
4.94
7.38
6.11
2.18
0.04
0.15
0.16
2.94
0.32
1.26
0.51
5.00
0.49
1.94
0.81
5.77
0.23
1.13
0.60
9.40
3.11
4.98
3.57
5.43
0.25
0.78
0.56
2.40
0.10
0.07
0.22
4.66
0.18
0.45
0.43
BKI
0.00
0.09
1.33
0.02
0.06
0.09
1.81
0.03
0.02
0.12
15.11
3.53
5.36
4.27
2.01
0.03
0.14
0.14
2.18
0.22
0.71
0.36
4.98
0.39
1.57
0.70
5.77
0.18
1.15
0.56
9.40
2.59
4.12
3.05
4.94
0.20
0.78
0.49
2.26
0.07
0.07
0.18
4.26
0.15
0.39
0.38
CO (g/m)
SMT
0.12
1.23
10.67
0.58
2.72
1.23
14.37
1.36
1.45
2.04
314.05
102.03
107.56
113.55
21.19
0.53
3.37
1.78
39.33
12.39
18.13
14.16
48.75
0.49
6.02
3.34
81.94
0.59
12.28
5.90
136.99
19.28
42.23
27.01
49.04
5.59
9.69
8.13
24.28
0.84
1.01
2.09
26.83
3.60
7.34
5.07
BKI
0.00
1.03
10.23
0.44
1.82
1.03
12.05
1.20
0.86
1.74
258.26
95.36
85.92
103.26
18.63
0.43
2.20
1.49
25.53
8.82
10.13
9.77
50.54
0.33
4.64
3.20
78.73
0.51
12.21
5.69
127.31
15.69
31.36
22.49
38.56
4.84
7.70
6.79
22.70
0.46
0.53
1.65
19.68
2.55
4.21
3.55
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.03
0.05
0.45
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.37
0.11
0.22
0.13
1.30
1.25
1.49
1.27
2.06
0.23
0.36
0.33
4.63
2.14
2.83
2.31
3.77
1.14
1.55
1.30
5.51
2.05
1.09
2.17
5.24
2.46
3.33
2.66
5.00
2.24
3.62
2.48
2.03
0.42
1.25
0.57
3.14
0.70
1.28
0.87
BKI
0.05
0.06
0.45
0.05
0.02
0.07
0.37
0.12
0.24
0.14
1.74
1.49
1.67
1.52
2.33
0.23
0.38
0.35
3.74
1.98
2.35
2.09
4.18
1.20
1.53
1.37
5.74
2.12
1.27
2.26
5.30
2.74
3.37
2.92
5.37
2.25
3.51
2.50
2.29
0.44
1.15
0.59
3.17
0.14
0.00
0.29
C02 (g/m)
SMT
625.38
477.75
851.61
486.47
693.58
518.77
964.13
472.95
675.11
512.35
820.18
480.16
676.89
511.56
818.51
480.50
710.00
513.45
876.11
509.65
810.11
549.19
929.30
569.80
781.87
602.31
972.46
601.71
746.19
632.53
783.11
471.70
657.57
500.77
792.62
439.48
586.23
467.98
840.68
498.59
688.70
530.19
882.85
469.12
696.22
506.34
BKI
558.99
454.34
853.29
500.63
667.91
529.55
898.68
478.55
636.26
511.31
665.78
445.12
575.77
465.69
761.54
462.75
618.51
488.72
577.47
393.53
481.48
408.99
872.56
551.49
689.18
577.16
893.54
581.25
676.92
605.50
705.07
445.75
568.65
467.51
721.65
447.63
570.83
470.37
754.53
454.52
549.38
477.23
727.33
429.42
567.16
454.49
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.56
1.46
7.26
2.35
0.92
2.51
3.17
3.90
-1.09
3.51
268.16
97.99
22.35
101.74
10.88
1.51
-1.87
1.76
7.86
2.88
1.34
3.03
8.04
7.62
-0.90
7.08
26.48
25.24
2.25
23.63
80.56
44.41
26.45
45.02
18.50
6.08
1.56
6.41
1.89
1.61
0.54
1.55
29.91
2.74
-0.22
3.95
Distance
(miles)
1.17
10.85
1.17
8.70
1.12
10.99
1.19
8.68
1.21
11.08
1.22
8.74
1.20
11.16
1.16
8.59
1.17
10.92
1.15
8.54
1.17
10.87
1.16
8.55
1.13
10.84
1.30
8.78
1.29
11.37
1.18
8.75
1.20
11.14
1.19
8.71
1.21
11.11
1.23
8.73
1.24
11.21
1.20
8.68
1.20
11.08
38
-------
RunID
84775
84775
84775
84775
84777
84777
84777
84777
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
o
J
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
5.82
1.06
2.10
1.38
9.88
0.35
1.20
0.91
BKI
4.77
0.93
1.75
1.19
9.66
0.34
1.26
0.88
CO (g/m)
SMT
61.15
11.46
18.81
14.56
173.99
5.59
38.04
16.56
BKI
45.78
9.94
13.94
12.12
164.67
5.16
36.88
15.58
NOx (g/m)
SMT
5.88
2.43
3.30
2.67
2.00
3.50
2.91
3.38
BKI
5.35
2.39
2.96
2.58
2.09
3.61
2.80
3.48
C02 (g/m)
SMT
1149.82
639.82
957.77
687.87
766.98
441.77
662.20
473.78
BKI
943.21
584.13
777.30
616.25
702.27
438.76
591.19
462.83
PM2.5
(mg/m)
11.65
3.68
-1.37
3.76
42.83
1.78
-1.83
3.65
Distance
(miles)
1.21
8.60
1.15
10.96
1.21
8.85
1.21
11.27
39
-------
Plots of Dynamometer Measurements vs. SEMTECH Measurements
In the following plots of emissions by test phase, the symbols and colors used vary. Phase 1 emissions are depicted
in red, phase 2 emissions in green, and phase 3 emissions in brown. HC, CO, NOx, and CO2 are depicted using
dots, squares, triangles, and circle-crosses, respectively. Note that the 1:1 line depicted is for reference purposes; it
is not a regression line.
25
20
15
10
Scatter Plot of Phase! HC (g/mile)
5 10 15 20
SEMTECH HC (g/mile)
/proj1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
25
Scatter Plot of Phasel CO (g/mile)
8
400
350
300
250
m
150
100
50
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
SEMTECH CO (g/mile)
/proj1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
40
-------
Scatter Plot of Phasel NOx (g/mile)
10
9
8
7-
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
8 9
234567
SEMTECH NOx (g/mile)
/proj1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
10
Scatter Plot of Phasel CO2 (g/mile)
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1 2
0 0
0 0
3
0
0
4
0
0
5
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
SEMTECH CO2 (g/mile)
1 1 1
345
000
000
/proJ1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2«umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
41
-------
Scatter Plot of Phase2 HC (g/mile)
5 10 15 20
SEMTECH HC (g/mile)
/proJ1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
25
400
Scatter Plot of Phase2 CO (g/mile)
0 50
100
300
150 200 250
SEMTECH CO (g/mile)
/proj1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
400
42
-------
Scatter Plot of Phase2 NOx (g/mile)
123456789
SEMTECH NOx (g/mile)
/proJ1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
Scatter Plot of Phase2 CO2 (g/mile)
1 2
0 0
0 0
3
0
0
4
0
0
5
0
0
7
0
0
9
0
0
1
2
0
0
SEMTECH CO2 (g/mile)
1 1 1
345
000
000
/prDj1/KansasCfly/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
43
-------
Scatter Plot of Phases HC (g/mile)
5 10 15 20
SEMTECH HC (g/mile)
/proj1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_[2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
25
Scatter Plot of Phases CO (g/mile)
400
8
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
SEMTECH CO (g/mile)
/proj1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
400
44
-------
Scatter Plot of Phases NOx (g/mile)
2345678
SEMTECH NOx (g/mile)
/proJ1/KansasCity/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
10
Scatter Plot of Phases CO2 (g/mile)
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1 2
0 0
0 0
3
0
0
4
0
0
5
0
0
7
0
0
9
0
0
1
2
0
0
SEMTECH CO2 (g/mile)
1 1 1
345
000
000
/prDj1/KansasCfly/Analysis/Round2^umBKI_SEM_r2.sas 25JUL06 15:19
45
-------
Plots of Dynamometer Measurements and PM2.s Measured by Gravimetric
Mass-DRI
Bag 1 - Cold Start (Log Scale)
A.IW*-PIC 1991 BiiuBk-im-nao duBk-wi-ieeB oihKk-me-NaKr ECer-ne IBBI mr-iea-ieeo
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
A**KmrtVtowKattDH-BNM ajuue «»
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
nei aituric-ieei-neo cituk-ieai-iBec niuK-isse-NewEr
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
46
-------
.XE
£
£
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
1
I
•
• 1
1
•
1
1
1
1
1
.
1
: • 1 •
• • i : ;
ill
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
47
-------
.-1
8
3
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
D.itu*-iB96-Newcr EAv-ne Wei
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
8
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
CUidc-nee-Newer EOv-Pie 1981 ECer-1BBI-i
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
48
-------
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
A.iwk-ne wei aiwk-tsei-iaeo cituk-ieei-ien onuJr-iaae-ifeMr E&r-Pie IBM
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
49
-------
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
I CUidc-nee-Newer EOv-Pie 1BSI ECer-ttBI-1
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
50
-------
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
I
• I
1
I
1 I ' i
A.iwk-Pic nBi aitu*-'B8i-'BBO duck-rea-iese Qihdc-iBse-Newer ECer-ne -net
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
M
D.ludt-1896-MMer EOr-Pie 1BSI ECer-19BI-19BO OCer-ieei-IBeB
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
51
-------
8
3
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
8
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
j J
CUidc-nee-Newer EOv-Pie 1981 fiCw-tSffl-'
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
52
-------
am -I
A.iu*-Fie ttffl
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
C.ludc-1391-IB!* D.1tu*-1B96-Newcr EAv-ne 1081
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
A.iwk-ne reel aiwk-wei-taeo
t QDuJr-iaaB-lfeMr E&r-Pie 1BB1 ECer-ttBI-i
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
53
-------
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
G
C
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
CUidc-nee-Newer EOv-Pie 1981 fiCw-tSffl-'
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
/tfcUKmnCWftoWKaidDH-BHMi XHJU6 «afl
54
-------
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
I I
I I
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
C.ThJ*-1BB1-ieeB Q.1uJ(-ie96-NeMer EOsr-Pie 1B8I
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
55
-------
8
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
8
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
CUidc-nee-Newer EOv-Pie 1981
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
/tfcUKmnCWftoWKaidDH-BHMi XHJU6 «afl
56
-------
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
A
A
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
A.iwk-ne wei aiwk-tsei-iaeo
Cfflufc-ieei-ien aitidr-iese-ttiMr
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
57
-------
Scatter Plots of Dynamometer Measurements vs. PM2.s Measured by
Gravimetric Mass-DRI
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite HC (Log Scale)- CAR
n n
8
Log HC Emission (g/mile)
* n n n
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite HC (Linear Scale)- CAR
9 10
HC Emission (g/mile)
58
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite HC (Log Scale)- TRUCK
Log HC Emission (g/mile)
* D D D A.1MC-RB 19BI O O O aiUOk-19ei-1990 A A A GllU*-1991-199B * * *
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2J5 vs Composite HC (Linear Scale)- TRUCK
667
a 10
14 *
HC Emission (g/mile)
59
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO (Log Scale)- CAR
D D
o c
o
o
n
Log CO Emission (g/mile)
O O ECnr-19ei-19BO A A A OC^-199I-19BK * * *
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2J5 vs Composite CO (Linear Scale)- CAR
n n
A n
O AC
CO Emission (g/mile)
60
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO (Log Scale)- TRUCK
^n
* *
Log CO Emission (g/knile)
* D D D A.1MC-RB 19BI O O O aiUOk-19ei-1990 A A A GllU*-1991-199B * * *
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO (Linear Scale)- TRUCK
CO Emission (g/mile)
61
-------
Plots of Dynamometer Measurements as a Function of Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
«G7«eB19B91BQ019aiQa21fl9819&(
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
62
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
3
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
BOO 1BBI 10GB 1BBB 1004 100B 1006 1087 1008 1000 2000
Model Year
63
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
8
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
8
Model Year
64
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
8
n n
wreierai9Boigmieni9a 1964 IBM iB8BiBeri9eei9B9igeoie9ii9aiHoiB94i9esi96BOT
Model Year
n n n
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
8
Model Year
65
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
wreierai9Boigmieni9a 1964 IBM iB8BiBeri9eei9B9igeoie9ii9aiHoiB94i9esi96BOT
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
Model Year
66
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
wreierai9Boigmieni9a 1964 IBM iB8BiBeri9eei9B9igeoie9ii9aiHoiB94i9esi96BOT
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
Model Year
67
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix H
Other Round 2 Data
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Weighted Emissions and Fuel Economy
-------
Weighted Regulated Emissions and Fuel Economy for the Round 1 Kansas City Test Fleet.
Rim #
84032
84034
84035
84036
84037
84039
84040
84042
84043
84047
84048
84050
84051
84052
84054
84055
84056
84057
84058
84061
84063
84064
84066
84067
84068
84069
84071
84072
84073
84074
84076
84077
84078
84079
84082
84083
84084
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2001 Chevrolet Cavalier
1999 IsuzuTrooper
2001 GMC Yukon
1995 Ford Escort
1979 Ford F250
2001 FordFlSO
1990 Dodge Spirit
1996 Honda Civic
1991 Honda Civic
1996 Mazda 626
1989 Dodge Caravan
2002 Honda Civic
1995 Chevy Corsica
1988 Olds Cutlass
1995 GMC Jimmy
1998 Jeep Cherokee
2002 Nissan Frontier P/U
2001 Saturn SL1
1999 Chysler 300M
1990 Chevy Cavalier
1998 Saturn SC
1994 Mercury Villager
1995 Jeep Wrangler
1995 Dodge Caravan
2001 Toyota Solara
1997 Dodge Caravan Sport
1989 Pontiac Grand Am
2003 Chevy S 10 P/U
1995 Chevy Blazer
1986 Nissan P/U
1968 FordMustang
1999 Honda Civic
1997 Honda Accord
1989 Honda Accord
2003 Ford Taurus
2000 Honda Accord
1998 Chevy Malibu
Odometer
Miles
57066
63387
75374
102663
02285
48831
109270
131492
216571
26614
161033
50405
111484
81545
102924
131884
38153
51541
73246
81297
74642
131405
71165
138912
48090
90070
116827
19374
100766
138620
98864
76504
79593
209991
25287
77962
99436
Inertia
Lbs
3000
4500
5500
2750
3500
5500
3000
2500
2500
3000
3500
3000
3000
3000
3500
3500
4500
2500
3500
2750
2500
4000
3000
4000
3500
3500
3000
3500
3500
3500
3000
2500
3000
2750
3500
3000
3000
Hp@50mph
6.4
14.8
18.8
5.6
10.5
16.2
8.7
6.9
6.9
7.7
7.6
5.3
5.9
6.4
10.7
11.8
16.5
6.1
5.8
5.6
6.0
8.4
15.7
7.0
7.0
7.2
5.9
12.0
10.7
11.4
8.0
5.1
4.9
6.0
6.8
7.8
5.8
HC
gm/mile
0.124
0.122
0.292
0.197
1.557
0.219
0.358
0.313
0.570
0.143
1.104
0.079
0.175
0.469
0.208
1.066
0.105
0.517
0.130
0.536
0.135
0.277
0.467
0.438
0.109
0.214
2.231
0.095
0.395
0.358
4.724
0.072
0.122
1.863
0.059
0.087
0.122
NOx
gm/mile
0.10
0.47
0.52
1.64
1.26
0.18
2.40
0.63
2.33
0.07
3.44
0.06
0.86
2.11
1.11
4.15
0.30
0.10
0.33
1.07
0.56
1.28
0.38
1.58
0.32
0.68
5.35
0.19
1.44
4.53
3.37
0.21
0.31
0.98
0.11
0.18
0.65
CO
gm/mile
0.43
2.18
3.54
6.70
32.78
2.07
8.98
4.76
10.46
0.87
9.09
2.89
5.17
5.25
2.84
9.77
3.47
16.26
0.92
4.90
0.79
3.40
15.86
5.54
2.01
1.44
11.26
0.54
6.09
12.23
68.23
3.18
2.76
64.21
0.44
3.13
1.02
C02
gm/mile
361.4
506.3
704.4
349.6
667.6
674.6
407.7
319.3
289.5
439.4
422.1
366.9
361.2
460.4
511.6
507.5
535.0
281.4
461.2
352.5
341.7
444.1
437.5
446.3
465.7
446.5
341.2
515.0
457.5
390.8
477.5
264.2
382.0
370.4
458.9
368.6
414.7
Fuel Economy
mpg
23.75
16.88
12.11
23.86
11.89
12.69
20.35
26.27
27.97
19.51
19.57
23.16
23.27
18.31
16.66
16.36
15.92
27.90
18.59
23.79
25.07
19.12
18.56
18.86
18.35
19.15
23.53
16.68
18.38
20.94
14.36
31.95
22.26
18.04
18.72
23.03
20.66
-------
Rim #
84086
84087
84088
84090
84091
84092
84093
84094
84096
84097
84098
84099
84101
84102
84103
84105
84107
84108
84113
84119
84121
84122
84125
84126
84127
84128
84129
84131
84133
84134
84135
84138
84139
84140
84141
84144
84145
84146
84148
84149
84150
84153
84154
84157
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2004 Honda Odyssey
2000 Hyundai Tiburon
1998 Chevrolet Lrnnina
1999 Ford Mustang
1991 Cadillac Seville
1999 Saturn
1997 Nissan Sentra
1993 Ford Explorer
1999 Isuzu Rodeo
2002 Mercury Sable
1999 Ford Ranger
1999 Toyota Avalon
2004 Toyota Camry
1998 Honda Civic
2000 Nissan Maxima
1997 Toyota Corolla
1989 Buick LeSabre
1990 Honda Civic
1993 Pontiac Grand Prix
1995 Jeep Cherokee
2001 Volvo S80
1999 Dodge Caravan
1995 Ford Explorer
1988 Ford Thunderbird
2000 Chrysler Town and Country
2000 Toyota Camry
1999 Toyota CelicaGT
1997 Chevy Cavalier
1998 Buick Century
1997 Mercury Grand Marquis
1993 Ford Probe
1995 Ford Bronco
1999 Ford Escort
2002 Chevy Blazer
1990 Honda Accord
1993 Plymouth Voyager
1990 Jeep Cherokee
1988 Ford Ranger
1991 Dodge Dynasty
2002 Ford Escort SE
2000 Honda Odyssey
2000 Ford Fl 50 PU
1979 Ford F150PU
1994 Nissan Sentra
Odometer
Miles
21035
89226
70740
39505
70502
53427
119201
120280
114937
24589
91045
114759
169043
149665
74273
146471
108562
214131
172185
171701
55523
104207
160621
178221
85431
48465
72233
128172
71195
74497
129131
198053
66820
35072
170433
170027
261848
74743
91324
26748
68979
61040
53503
127063
Inertia
Lbs
4500
3000
3500
3500
3500
2500
2750
4000
4000
3500
3500
3500
3500
2500
3500
2750
3500
2500
3500
4000
4000
4000
4500
3500
4500
3500
3000
3000
3500
4000
3000
5000
2750
3500
3000
4000
3500
3500
3000
3000
4500
4500
3500
2750
Hp@50mph
12.0
5.9
5.5
9.7
6.2
5.5
7.0
10.2
14.0
6.8
12.1
5.9
7.2
5.1
7.4
7.8
7.0
6.5
5.0
13.1
4.0
7.3
11.5
9.1
9.3
7.3
6.5
5.4
5.9
9.5
8.1
10.7
5.6
11.3
5.9
7.3
10.8
10.2
6.8
7.3
9.6
16.9
11.7
7.1
HC
gm/mile
0.097
0.115
0.235
0.130
0.284
0.065
0.191
0.303
1.044
0.077
0.161
0.318
0.558
0.189
0.172
0.324
0.266
0.644
0.887
1.838
0.079
0.164
0.219
0.847
0.218
0.244
0.242
0.151
0.149
0.280
0.431
0.538
0.080
0.090
0.442
0.844
1.154
1.184
1.165
0.078
0.161
0.116
12.132
0.462
NOx
gm/mile
0.11
0.36
0.54
0.35
0.72
0.89
0.60
1.90
1.63
0.09
0.36
0.38
2.16
0.59
0.48
0.54
0.74
2.66
1.73
5.77
0.08
0.34
2.24
1.73
0.44
0.46
0.44
0.59
0.35
1.62
0.57
2.50
0.72
0.22
0.97
2.03
2.07
1.63
3.45
0.09
0.37
0.41
4.69
0.82
CO
gm/mile
1.34
1.11
2.34
1.21
5.53
0.50
1.52
8.50
10.30
0.20
1.39
1.75
22.96
7.15
1.00
4.39
3.81
12.27
19.54
14.08
0.40
1.31
6.12
11.69
2.36
3.05
3.29
3.75
1.25
8.33
5.04
6.92
3.49
1.02
6.65
8.24
13.76
9.86
7.71
0.71
4.54
0.66
113.51
5.66
C02
gm/mile
509.9
396.0
448.2
469.4
521.9
314.9
367.8
513.9
489.9
436.6
486.2
413.8
383.2
253.9
426.3
301.7
453.5
325.4
435.5
510.1
456.8
474.0
544.8
510.8
554.4
402.2
371.4
363.7
441.8
522.1
388.4
648.1
336.0
508.2
368.1
452.1
280.7
378.0
431.5
342.8
515.0
573.4
572.0
298.4
Fuel Economy
mpg
16.80
21.62
19.02
18.25
16.20
27.25
23.22
16.30
16.90
19.69
17.61
20.62
20.45
32.39
20.09
27.80
18.70
24.83
18.36
16.00
18.81
18.06
15.51
16.19
15.41
21.11
22.81
23.26
19.38
16.06
21.65
13.03
25.19
16.88
22.66
18.41
28.14
21.67
19.25
25.01
16.47
14.98
10.93
27.88
-------
Rim #
84160
84161
84162
84164
84165
84167
84168
84171
84172
84173
84174
84178
84179
84182
84183
84184
84185
84188
84189
84191
84192
84193
84195
84196
84197
84201
84205
84206
84208
84209
84210
84211
84213
84214
84215
84216
84219
84220
84221
84223
84224
84225
84227
84228
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2001 Ford Focus
1997 Volvo 850
1983 Chrysler Lebaron
1999 Plymouth Voyager
1991 Mazda Protege
1999 Ford Ranger P/U
1996 Buick Regal Grand Sport
1988 Honda Civic DX
1986 Cadillac Cimmaron
1996 Mercury Sable
1994 MercuryTopaz
1997 Toyota Camry
1998 Jeep Cherokee
1995 Ford Thunderbird
2000 Toyota Corolla
2000 Honda Civic
1996 Toyota Corolla
1977 Chevy Monte Carlo
1984 Ford F150 Pickup
2000 Toyota Camry
2001 GMC Sonoma
2001 Hyundai Sante Fe
1999 Chevy Lumina
1993 GMC Safari
1990 Buick Regal
1985ChevS10
1998 Ford F150
1994 Chevy P/U
1989 Lincoln Towncar
1996 Dodge Stratus
1988 Mazda MX6
1 986 Ford Tempo
1985 Olds Regency 98
1994 Pontiac Bonneville
1992 Nissan Maxima
1990 Ford F150 P/U
1994 Chrysler Concorde
1992 Ford Escort
1985 Ford LTD Crown Victoria
2005 Dodge Caravan
2002 Ford Taurus
2000 Honda Civic LX
1997 Buick Century
1992 Pontiac Grand Am
Odometer
Miles
52253
65093
43291
74703
185576
92926
139861
205828
17610
110411
32694
129432
82874
135049
70126
40410
148865
35553
72318
47780
60059
70621
42985
283231
103881
30305
98670
99225
82512
126733
222715
60031
188058
125226
53987
7131
169018
12788
100260
18159
72468
35766
86430
140191
Inertia
Lbs
3000
3500
2750
4000
2750
3500
3500
2250
3000
3500
3000
3500
3500
4000
2750
2750
2750
4000
3500
3500
3500
4000
3500
4000
3000
3000
4500
4000
4000
3000
3000
2500
3500
3500
3500
4000
3500
2750
3500
4000
3500
2750
3500
3000
Hp@50mph
7.3
6.0
5.5
6.6
7.9
11.4
5.6
6.4
5.9
6.9
6.1
7.3
11.8
10.6
7.5
7.0
6.6
11.6
12.9
7.3
11.3
8.7
5.4
12.5
6.8
10.4
13.3
12.2
12.7
7.5
6.8
6.9
7.9
5.3
8.5
15.5
7.8
6.4
9.3
8.0
6.5
7.0
5.9
4.7
HC
gm/mile
0.125
0.245
0.475
0.188
3.395
0.294
0.145
1.186
0.454
0.468
0.368
0.228
0.490
0.467
0.144
0.152
0.358
4.706
18.474
0.218
0.067
0.102
0.135
2.068
0.352
5.676
0.144
0.807
2.217
0.518
0.821
0.463
0.597
0.154
0.193
0.511
1.002
1.368
1.276
0.051
0.062
0.120
0.168
1.249
NOx
gm/mile
0.35
0.79
0.81
0.27
4.42
0.61
0.78
1.37
0.94
1.12
1.30
0.61
1.29
1.41
0.59
0.11
0.68
2.12
1.50
0.38
0.19
0.56
0.40
3.04
2.07
3.47
0.56
0.66
3.90
3.77
2.87
1.04
0.98
0.63
0.63
2.29
2.42
1.26
0.74
0.17
0.13
0.09
0.41
1.46
CO
gm/mile
2.09
1.00
24.26
1.46
13.01
5.65
1.98
14.86
5.75
5.20
1.67
2.68
6.71
12.13
1.55
7.08
4.87
66.09
199.74
2.13
1.09
2.99
1.01
15.06
6.53
78.62
3.59
13.11
28.56
12.39
11.59
9.69
23.60
1.93
2.05
1.37
9.15
49.94
27.44
0.68
0.53
7.07
1.30
33.01
C02
gm/mile
383.7
482.7
425.9
456.6
314.7
415.7
448.6
278.1
431.4
377.9
534.5
398.6
501.0
565.3
333.8
321.8
310.8
504.6
349.1
381.5
505.6
436.0
450.6
477.9
422.6
416.6
606.3
578.7
502.7
406.7
340.6
419.2
555.2
493.8
453.0
561.0
446.0
326.0
544.5
478.5
440.3
302.7
429.0
424.1
Fuel Economy
mpg
22.22
17.75
18.49
18.74
24.91
20.23
19.04
28.21
19.48
22.21
15.99
21.33
16.78
14.70
25.57
25.82
26.94
13.82
11.96
22.33
16.96
19.52
19.02
16.95
19.84
15.44
14.06
14.30
15.53
20.12
23.83
19.75
14.49
17.31
18.84
15.24
18.57
21.06
14.55
17.95
19.51
27.39
19.95
17.94
-------
Rim #
84229
84230
84231
84233
84234
84235
84236
84238
84239
84240
84241
84242
84244
84245
84246
84248
84250
84252
84253
84256
84257
84261
84263
84265
84266
84267
84268
84270
84271
84272
84274
84276
84277
84278
84279
84280
84281
84283
84284
84285
84286
84287
84289
84291
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2000 Olds Silhouette
1993 Nissan Sentra
1994 Olds Eighty Eight
1989 Toyota Corolla
1991 VW Cabriolet
1990GeoPrizm
1992 Olds Achieva
1988 Pontiac 6000 Wagon
1987 Ford Taurus
1998 Infiniti 130
1998 Ford Contour
1997 Plymouth Voyager
1992 Ford Escort
1987 Honda Accord
1994 Eagle Talon
1987 Ford Ranger
1987 Ford Escort
2001 Ford Taurus
1997 Mercury Sable
1989 Chevy S10P/U
1983 Volvo GL
1989 Toyota Camry
1989 Dodge Ram P/U
1 984 Buick Century
2000 Kia Sephia
1989 Chevrolet Cavalier
1994 Ford F150 P/U
1986 Mercury Grand Marquis
1979 Buick LeSabre
2001 Honda Accord
1995 Ford Aspire
1989 Buick Park Avenue
1978MGMGB
1990 GMC Jimmy
2001 Toyota Camry 3.0L
1999 Ford Escort
1995 Chevy Suburban
1986 Dodge P/U
1987 Chevy Caprice Wagon
2000 Honda Civic
1997 Olds. Silhouette
! 995 GMC Sierra P/U
1984 Olds Custom Cruiser Wagon
1997 Honda Civic
Odometer
Miles
85292
87073
128014
181875
63829
176712
177104
133737
33610
50005
118535
70430
11345
19268
109747
1705
78217
30917
104330
174034
184224
269020
132325
1878
58660
58439
169749
36277
37608
39702
188078
128607
42926
130254
61415
74102
73848
47582
29828
46677
111026
171370
8983
75783
Inertia
Lbs
4000
2500
3500
2500
2750
2500
3000
3500
3000
3500
3000
3500
2750
2750
3500
3000
2500
3500
3500
3000
3000
3500
3500
3000
2750
2750
4500
4000
3500
3500
2250
3500
2750
3500
4000
2750
5000
3500
4500
2750
4000
4000
4500
2500
Hp@50mph
11.5
6.2
6.5
5.9
8.0
6.9
4.9
6.8
6.9
6.4
4.8
6.7
7.4
6.0
10.6
10.4
7.4
6.8
8.0
10.4
10.5
7.7
15.0
7.3
6.3
6.7
12.9
10.7
10.5
7.8
6.1
6.0
6.1
14.5
7.0
4.9
10.8
12.8
9.6
7.0
10.1
12.2
11.6
5.0
HC
gm/mile
0.156
0.314
0.186
0.846
0.229
2.145
0.461
0.719
0.415
0.184
0.605
0.248
1.561
3.011
0.731
1.083
2.935
0.163
0.210
0.425
0.556
1.218
1.209
11.214
0.090
0.336
0.725
0.949
1.283
0.076
0.501
0.207
14.547
0.571
0.114
0.079
0.469
5.775
1.318
0.131
0.230
0.639
4.981
0.277
NOx
gm/mile
0.48
0.51
0.40
1.49
1.04
4.98
2.34
1.60
1.38
0.25
0.36
0.43
2.83
2.16
1.22
1.64
2.57
0.06
0.93
1.44
2.20
2.01
2.59
1.24
0.14
1.19
3.84
1.72
7.53
0.08
1.88
1.12
1.03
0.63
0.18
0.65
1.22
1.65
4.59
0.14
2.22
1.56
4.96
0.36
CO
gm/mile
1.40
7.48
2.09
13.29
3.26
14.26
6.69
6.85
7.47
0.58
22.17
1.34
20.24
18.35
10.72
8.67
27.34
1.24
5.06
8.88
5.71
11.74
43.05
135.03
0.32
5.59
2.75
11.19
11.88
1.14
7.33
2.49
150.16
10.77
4.11
2.94
11.19
79.25
29.82
5.75
5.18
7.60
69.64
4.36
C02
gm/mile
546.8
336.2
484.8
309.5
337.4
310.2
395.9
419.2
499.3
432.2
418.0
454.4
329.0
385.4
496.2
437.7
317.7
470.0
446.2
447.8
466.9
170.7
398.7
521.1
361.7
376.8
591.6
500.9
508.1
426.5
307.3
467.7
267.5
426.7
470.0
315.3
660.0
433.1
520.2
339.5
535.5
492.0
458.7
285.0
Fuel Economy
mpg
15.67
24.67
17.62
25.85
25.08
25.38
21.11
19.92
16.80
19.85
18.93
18.82
23.55
20.33
16.70
18.93
23.29
18.22
18.93
18.59
18.02
44.62
18.31
11.21
23.75
22.26
14.39
16.51
16.22
20.09
26.87
18.23
15.70
19.33
18.05
26.89
12.68
14.96
15.07
24.67
15.81
17.02
14.75
29.41
-------
Rim #
84292
84293
84295
84296
84297
84298
84300
84301
84302
84303
84304
84305
84307
84309
84310
84311
84314
84315
84316
84317
84318
84319
84322
84323
84324
84325
84327
84329
84330
84334
84335
84336
84337
84338
84339
84342
84343
84344
84347
84349
84351
84353
84354
84355
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1997 Toyota Camry
1984 Volvo GL Wagon
1987 Chevy Caprice Classic
1998 Honda Civic
1996 Dodge Stratus
1999 Dodge Durango
1990 Buick Lesabre
1989 Pontiac Grand Prix
1993 Ford F150P/U
2002 Olds Silhouette
2001 Honda Civic
1999 Chevy Malibu
1992 Honda Accord
1973 Mercedes 280 SE
2003 Chevy Venture
1989 Toyota Corolla
1989 Plymouth Sundance
1991 Plymouth Voyager
1996 Dodge Avenger
2000 Nissan Altima
1997 Nissan Sentra
1998 Toyota Camry
1990 Toyota Camry
2004 Kia Rio Cinco
1999 Toyota Camry
1998 Nissan Maxima
1998 Ford Taurus
1997 Jeep Wrangler
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier
1990 Chevrolet Caprice Estate Wagon
1988 Mercury Grand Marquis
1987 Toyota P/U
2003 Ford Ranger P/U
2001 Saturn
1 999 Plymouth Grand Voyager
1994 Toyota Camry
2004 Kia Sedona
2000 Toyota Sienna
1995 Toyota Corolla
2003 Chevrolet Tracker
1996 Ford Contour
1993 Saturn Wagon
1989 Ford F150
2001 Chevrolet Lumina
Odometer
Miles
127414
299703
85915
115370
146579
92681
59413
149395
184984
40271
49751
76627
74582
81588
24915
80749
144672
158771
124729
95313
154255
127663
202804
6260
60286
111655
77804
94832
8420
72464
87717
225176
11678
63172
75489
128229
6344
131771
106201
22365
98572
220839
61510
57829
Inertia
Lbs
3500
3000
4000
2500
3000
5000
3500
3500
4500
4500
2750
3500
3000
4000
4500
2500
2750
3500
3000
3500
2750
3500
3000
2750
3500
3000
3500
3500
3000
4500
4000
2750
3500
3000
4000
3500
4000
4000
2500
3000
3000
3000
4000
3500
Hp@50mph
7.3
10.7
9.7
5.1
7.5
16.9
6.8
4.5
12.8
16.2
8.0
5.8
5.7
11.4
16.2
5.9
6.9
7.6
4.4
7.9
7.0
6.4
5.9
6.7
6.4
6.1
5.0
16.1
3.9
9.6
12.5
9.6
4.1
6.4
6.6
7.2
6.8
6.5
6.0
12.7
5.6
4.8
15.3
7.0
HC
gm/mile
0.282
1.102
4.017
0.093
0.359
0.235
0.183
3.365
0.534
0.073
0.051
0.130
0.217
9.252
0.073
0.394
0.697
0.990
0.859
0.133
0.286
0.209
0.299
0.037
0.247
0.410
0.124
0.204
0.078
3.097
0.665
0.591
0.066
0.060
0.186
0.186
0.050
0.380
0.355
0.097
0.186
0.620
1.374
0.072
NOx
gm/mile
0.77
2.56
2.56
0.08
0.63
0.87
0.39
1.66
1.91
0.25
0.15
0.53
0.60
2.16
0.22
1.13
2.38
1.93
0.77
0.88
1.08
0.63
1.28
0.05
0.47
0.41
0.26
0.27
0.03
1.93
1.19
3.37
0.19
0.09
0.39
0.33
0.00
0.65
0.86
0.19
0.42
0.97
5.85
0.23
CO
gm/mile
7.67
10.11
44.97
3.67
8.55
7.69
1.89
32.08
6.20
0.76
1.08
1.71
3.61
174.36
0.83
11.50
18.96
6.74
7.94
5.95
3.84
2.59
7.47
0.60
4.91
2.16
1.86
2.22
0.63
59.03
4.84
1.11
0.45
0.56
1.28
1.32
0.55
2.25
5.18
0.48
6.33
11.63
6.79
1.07
C02
gm/mile
414.6
410.3
501.6
277.4
389.7
702.4
461.6
470.3
539.1
519.6
329.6
411.4
394.6
507.2
534.6
332.5
361.9
370.9
349.0
416.0
340.6
389.5
314.1
324.7
405.6
405.9
442.9
509.1
348.9
618.4
513.9
381.5
479.2
383.4
504.1
452.1
516.6
526.6
339.7
428.9
377.3
321.1
599.2
452.4
Fuel Economy
mpg
20.14
20.04
14.72
30.37
21.30
12.04
18.50
16.21
15.64
16.52
25.97
20.77
21.47
10.63
16.05
24.47
21.86
22.38
23.64
20.22
24.77
21.84
26.34
26.42
20.79
20.97
19.29
16.77
24.58
11.94
16.44
22.36
17.93
22 39
16.99
18.93
16.63
16.20
24.67
20.02
22.20
25.22
14.02
18.95
-------
Rim #
84356
84357
84359
84361
84362
84363
84365
84366
84367
84368
84369
84370
84372
84373
84375
84376
84377
84379
84380
84381
84382
84383
84384
84386
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1997 Pontiac Grand Am
1995 Mercury Tracer
1992 Toyota Corolla
2002 Nissan Maxima
1998 Ford Taurus
1996 Toyota Corolla
1993 Ford Taurus
1989 Olds Cutlass Wagon
1980Mercedes 450 SEL
1997 Saturn SL
1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
1995 Ford Taurus
1994 Toyota Camry
1990 Chevrolet Astrovan
2001 FordWindstar
2000 Honda Odyssey
1997 Honda Accord
1998 Pontiac Grand Am
1995 Lincoln Continental
1994 Mercury Marquis
1999VWCabrio
1996 Toyota Camry
1996GeoPrizm
1990 Nissan Maxima
Odometer
Miles
120921
146970
84923
80356
91855
288784
69365
118187
185888
170227
81784
70394
88215
235476
37923
117948
77801
75722
100959
127784
38317
164875
169535
258738
Inertia
Lbs
3000
2750
2750
3500
3500
2750
3500
3000
4000
2500
3500
3500
3500
4000
4500
4500
3000
3000
4000
4000
3000
3500
2750
2750
Hp@50mph
3.8
4.5
8.6
5.0
5.0
6.6
5.5
5.7
8.3
6.7
7.3
5.4
7.2
12.0
10.1
9.6
4.9
4.4
5.7
10.7
6.9
6.9
7.0
5.8
HC
gm/mile
0.187
1.086
0.205
0.095
0.130
0.651
0.309
0.231
15.310
0.242
0.288
0.157
0.218
6.621
0.057
0.850
0.120
0.144
0.411
0.494
0.131
0.085
0.559
0.574
NOx
gm/mile
1.37
0.57
1.10
0.09
0.17
1.49
0.66
0.75
0.25
0.55
1.38
0.55
0.24
0.52
0.19
0.62
0.23
0.55
1.00
0.95
0.36
0.31
1.01
0.76
CO
gm/mile
5.10
44.54
3.16
1.11
1.59
7.27
6.42
3.30
268.12
1.67
4.79
2.19
1.23
166.23
1.24
13.90
1.32
5.63
4.70
6.55
2.11
2.27
7.65
4.60
C02
gm/mile
371.7
304.5
339.1
445.1
419.9
325.0
483.6
417.1
323.0
313.0
475.0
427.2
409.1
379.7
506.7
503.0
344.5
427.9
427.0
478.2
355.5
400.9
324.9
398.4
Fuel Economy
mpg
22.63
22.78
24.98
19.25
20.36
25.44
17.40
20.35
10.88
27.21
17.81
19.97
20.91
13.02
16.92
16.32
24.81
19.69
19.76
17.57
23.96
21.27
25.42
21.13
-------
Correlation Testing Data
-------
Comparison of SEMTECH and Dyno Emission Measurement
RunID
84032
84032
84032
84032
84034
84034
84034
84034
84035
84035
84035
84035
84036
84036
84036
84036
84037
84037
84037
84037
84039
84039
84039
84039
84040
84040
84040
84040
84042
84042
84042
84042
84043
84043
84043
84043
84047
84047
84047
84047
84048
84048
84048
84048
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.53
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.57
0.07
0.09
0.10
1.10
0.21
0.18
0.26
1.74
0.10
0.31
0.20
8.98
1.78
2.15
2.18
1.38
0.10
0.08
0.17
1.88
0.29
0.76
0.40
3.03
0.15
0.53
0.32
2.89
0.47
1.01
0.63
1.38
0.04
0.19
0.12
6.19
0.59
1.67
0.95
BKI
2.36
0.01
0.03
0.12
1.09
0.07
0.07
0.12
2.22
0.18
0.19
0.29
1.79
0.10
0.26
0.20
9.33
1.02
2.44
1.55
1.70
0.14
0.12
0.22
1.91
0.25
0.57
0.36
3.04
0.15
0.39
0.31
2.96
0.41
0.74
0.57
1.79
0.04
0.19
0.14
6.61
0.72
1.77
1.10
CO (g/m)
SMT
7.21
0.14
0.15
0.49
4.14
3.15
2.01
3.12
12.39
4.67
1.21
4.84
15.03
7.03
7.59
7.48
157.35
49.48
33.06
54.00
10.33
2.04
1.09
2.42
23.61
9.56
16.07
10.73
16.66
4.81
6.91
5.54
23.68
11.47
14.70
12.34
4.78
0.52
4.27
1.00
17.30
8.74
17.27
9.77
BKI
7.77
0.05
0.11
0.43
3.45
2.14
1.33
2.15
12.25
3.16
0.74
3.47
12.97
6.34
5.66
6.64
154.15
25.05
32.90
32.34
10.69
1.64
0.73
2.05
20.81
8.07
11.23
8.95
15.25
4.17
4.38
4.74
20.48
9.81
10.28
10.41
5.27
0.41
3.39
0.87
15.82
8.29
13.54
9.04
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.53
0.05
0.33
0.09
1.43
0.49
0.51
0.54
2.56
0.47
0.39
0.58
2.78
1.58
1.55
1.64
1.38
1.84
2.50
1.86
0.67
0.22
0.02
0.23
3.56
2.48
2.15
2.51
2.87
0.55
0.68
0.67
2.70
2.41
2.54
2.43
0.56
0.05
0.02
0.07
6.33
3.07
4.90
3.36
BKI
0.63
0.05
0.40
0.10
1.50
0.40
0.44
0.46
2.80
0.39
0.39
0.51
2.86
1.56
1.56
1.63
1.45
1.15
2.38
1.25
0.71
0.16
0.01
0.18
3.81
2.32
2.20
2.38
2.82
0.51
0.60
0.63
3.14
2.26
2.31
2.31
0.70
0.04
0.00
0.07
6.73
3.07
5.27
3.41
C02 (g/m)
SMT
584.67
338.13
460.53
358.89
848.87
523.01
712.83
553.22
1079.75
809.65
893.91
829.64
616.58
314.28
514.53
343.57
971.63
1016.34
806.51
999.49
956.87
658.23
857.38
687.53
624.56
395.08
572.60
419.13
519.65
300.54
456.19
322.05
441.70
309.64
476.13
328.11
670.92
404.65
523.51
426.67
613.59
378.71
578.25
404.66
BKI
586.11
338.79
462.20
359.64
836.92
472.95
631.57
502.92
1053.73
665.10
838.55
697.48
577.11
326.66
442.04
347.55
935.24
635.31
757.62
659.41
1005.49
635.99
833.81
668.97
599.08
387.23
599.08
405.32
470.51
305.30
373.53
318.20
405.65
277.19
339.91
288.37
710.46
413.05
540.98
437.27
607.88
399.16
538.36
419.55
PM2.5
(mg/m)
15.86
1.61
6.00
2.62
9.26
2.19
4.24
2.70
6.32
6.27
0.96
5.91
6.60
1.63
0.73
1.82
11.88
9.52
2.56
9.16
7.83
2.39
2.19
2.66
2.53
4.96
2.53
4.84
15.37
1.80
4.66
2.68
5.89
3.57
0.87
3.50
9.67
1.10
3.27
1.69
239.55
47.17
89.24
60.03
Distance
(miles)
1.12
8.59
1.19
10.91
1.20
8.72
1.22
11.13
1.20
8.64
1.20
11.03
1.18
8.63
1.18
10.99
1.20
8.67
1.19
11.06
1.23
8.76
1.19
11.17
1.17
8.55
1.17
10.89
1.14
8.65
1.16
10.96
1.22
8.62
1.19
11.03
1.18
8.64
1.19
11.01
1.19
8.64
1.18
11.01
-------
RunID
84050
84050
84050
84050
84051
84051
84051
84051
84052
84052
84052
84052
84054
84054
84054
84054
84055
84055
84055
84055
84056
84056
84056
84056
84057
84057
84057
84057
84058
84058
84058
84058
84060
84060
84060
84060
84061
84061
84061
84061
84062
84062
84062
84062
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.02
0.02
0.05
0.07
1.67
0.07
0.33
0.17
3.54
0.24
1.29
0.48
2.74
0.04
0.23
0.19
2.89
0.90
2.28
1.10
0.57
0.08
0.08
0.10
0.34
0.54
0.20
0.51
1.79
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.97
0.03
0.33
0.10
2.64
0.42
1.28
0.59
0.80
0.02
0.12
0.07
BKI
0.98
0.03
0.04
0.08
1.69
0.08
0.28
0.18
3.68
0.21
1.35
0.47
2.92
0.04
0.24
0.21
2.93
0.86
2.16
1.06
0.69
0.07
0.06
0.10
0.40
0.55
0.21
0.51
2.01
0.03
0.05
0.13
1.15
0.02
0.30
0.10
2.44
0.38
1.09
0.53
0.91
0.01
0.13
0.07
CO (g/m)
SMT
14.07
2.68
3.94
3.35
22.01
4.02
8.37
5.25
24.79
5.05
8.11
6.28
25.78
1.62
5.62
3.16
25.06
10.44
16.32
11.62
4.00
4.01
1.83
3.86
2.61
17.95
9.17
16.55
8.74
0.47
1.55
0.97
7.15
0.45
4.98
1.11
22.30
4.79
7.91
5.90
6.27
0.30
1.79
0.71
BKI
11.56
2.36
2.94
2.88
19.78
4.21
6.22
5.15
22.90
4.05
6.95
5.22
24.00
1.40
4.86
2.83
23.41
8.57
13.58
9.70
4.35
3.51
1.69
3.43
2.60
17.52
9.20
16.17
9.15
0.39
1.57
0.92
7.82
0.33
4.49
1.00
17.66
4.05
5.85
4.87
6.84
0.20
1.53
0.64
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.44
0.05
0.08
0.07
2.89
0.71
0.74
0.83
4.00
1.96
2.82
2.13
3.64
1.01
1.29
1.17
5.42
4.99
4.84
5.00
0.63
0.30
0.23
0.31
0.97
0.06
0.02
0.10
1.34
0.23
0.37
0.29
1.04
0.93
1.28
0.96
2.23
0.98
1.90
1.11
1.38
0.82
1.06
0.86
BKI
0.45
0.03
0.03
0.06
3.12
0.73
0.81
0.86
4.05
1.91
3.01
2.10
3.75
0.93
1.29
1.10
5.26
4.03
4.56
4.13
0.81
0.27
0.24
0.30
0.94
0.05
0.01
0.09
1.59
0.25
0.45
0.33
1.14
0.90
1.22
0.93
2.28
0.94
1.78
1.06
1.58
0.87
1.06
0.92
C02 (g/m)
SMT
661.16
394.99
600.97
422.82
579.39
312.83
515.12
340.36
722.87
470.72
652.76
496.24
745.11
494.26
682.47
520.38
856.50
572.19
729.99
598.08
749.34
509.49
667.51
532.78
493.85
253.61
381.88
274.90
687.11
429.74
582.43
453.18
783.31
418.65
659.86
454.28
642.39
375.25
661.00
408.73
791.19
406.40
646.36
442.69
BKI
579.28
345.72
453.41
365.13
548.13
341.88
449.61
359.84
696.45
430.18
631.04
457.68
732.62
483.33
646.47
507.74
786.43
476.31
641.51
504.10
813.63
505.05
652.20
531.17
465.98
264.70
342.36
280.47
723.18
431.38
624.35
459.34
801.38
441.95
612.09
472.34
525.64
332.48
453.24
350.69
819.89
449.28
614.59
479.74
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.73
1.53
1.58
1.55
0.53
0.55
0.43
0.54
6.27
5.47
5.59
5.52
7.50
1.22
16.58
2.60
5.07
4.64
7.21
4.84
2.28
1.45
0.53
1.43
1.99
1.15
0.93
1.17
1.79
1.06
0.83
1.08
1.46
1.06
0.42
1.04
4.63
1.35
1.59
1.53
2.58
1.04
3.40
1.28
Distance
(miles)
1.18
8.66
1.18
11.01
1.18
8.61
1.16
10.95
1.19
8.71
1.19
11.09
1.20
8.57
1.18
10.95
1.21
8.65
1.19
11.05
1.18
8.62
1.19
10.99
1.18
8.64
1.20
11.02
1.16
8.63
1.17
10.96
1.18
8.59
1.18
10.95
1.16
8.62
1.19
10.97
1.17
8.61
1.18
10.97
10
-------
RunID
84063
84063
84063
84063
84064
84064
84064
84064
84066
84066
84066
84066
84067
84067
84067
84067
84068
84068
84068
84068
84069
84069
84069
84069
84071
84071
84071
84071
84072
84072
84072
84072
84073
84073
84073
84073
84074
84074
84074
84074
84076
84076
84076
84076
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.88
0.03
0.13
0.13
3.17
0.09
0.42
0.27
2.93
1.07
0.36
1.12
3.11
0.22
0.64
0.40
1.21
0.03
0.09
0.09
2.39
0.06
0.21
0.20
6.45
2.29
4.28
2.63
1.03
0.02
0.03
0.07
4.43
0.12
0.71
0.38
4.11
0.29
0.65
0.51
14.08
4.24
6.12
4.88
BKI
1.90
0.03
0.11
0.13
3.42
0.08
0.42
0.28
2.72
0.34
0.34
0.46
3.28
0.24
0.77
0.44
1.38
0.03
0.11
0.11
2.55
0.07
0.23
0.21
4.62
2.00
3.27
2.23
1.31
0.03
0.02
0.10
4.26
0.13
0.83
0.39
3.04
0.19
0.47
0.36
13.62
4.03
6.69
4.70
CO (g/m)
SMT
5.45
0.36
1.61
0.71
16.65
3.33
4.61
4.10
33.03
29.21
8.26
27.96
18.92
5.08
7.99
5.99
7.87
2.23
0.81
2.42
16.72
0.57
2.60
1.56
34.71
12.53
24.20
14.42
6.83
0.28
0.33
0.63
61.16
2.47
9.03
5.93
53.18
16.28
16.50
18.22
217.35
53.15
105.31
65.22
BKI
5.03
0.50
1.14
0.78
15.65
2.63
3.45
3.36
26.24
15.52
6.29
15.44
17.01
4.68
7.47
5.51
7.60
1.76
0.54
1.97
15.40
0.54
2.24
1.44
21.97
10.15
16.65
11.21
7.71
0.15
0.14
0.54
58.73
2.89
7.49
6.07
36.36
10.82
10.92
12.17
195.51
58.36
95.12
67.86
NOx (g/m)
SMT
4.31
0.33
0.43
0.54
5.01
1.00
1.42
1.23
1.80
0.53
0.50
0.59
3.86
1.32
1.76
1.48
1.40
0.23
0.23
0.29
2.80
0.48
0.86
0.63
3.36
3.64
4.44
3.68
0.68
0.17
0.03
0.19
4.18
1.23
1.80
1.42
8.73
5.99
5.85
6.12
2.44
4.04
2.89
3.88
BKI
4.34
0.34
0.44
0.55
5.64
1.00
1.44
1.27
1.76
0.29
0.40
0.37
4.32
1.39
1.86
1.58
1.82
0.23
0.30
0.32
3.12
0.51
0.93
0.68
6.86
5.09
6.66
5.29
0.74
0.17
0.03
0.19
4.17
1.25
1.81
1.44
7.32
4.34
4.76
4.52
2.05
3.42
3.37
3.34
C02 (g/m)
SMT
596.93
282.37
447.23
310.08
700.59
395.52
624.03
426.96
703.09
668.03
704.36
672.38
668.66
398.11
600.11
425.97
765.86
407.80
620.12
440.70
682.98
378.15
593.22
408.86
721.07
377.35
621.86
410.91
875.23
458.76
663.60
494.59
711.77
409.87
623.49
439.84
763.90
486.82
659.23
512.97
722.49
498.53
554.53
513.96
BKI
547.42
323.17
398.35
340.02
701 .62
415.91
577.38
441 .66
585.20
418.83
523.08
434.73
672.55
419.32
587.91
443.94
787.08
433.48
602.44
463.20
688.80
418.70
587.64
444.44
525.68
320.91
443.14
340.00
885.01
479.75
647.54
512.39
686.39
431.75
592.39
455.74
606.18
368.73
479.46
388.82
653.31
456.20
572.73
474.27
PM2.5
(mg/m)
3.90
2.06
1.33
2.11
2.88
0.48
-0.56
0.53
2.44
7.02
1.71
6.42
4.31
1.76
1.95
1.90
2.69
0.23
0.38
0.36
2.29
0.45
0.15
0.53
72.64
34.89
58.50
38.48
2.74
1.55
1.05
1.57
6.24
3.01
1.07
3.05
21.91
5.98
0.64
6.45
56.60
14.49
5.91
16.08
Distance
(miles)
1.19
8.65
1.18
11.03
1.17
8.63
1.18
10.98
1.19
8.59
1.18
10.97
1.19
8.65
1.17
11.01
1.17
8.63
1.18
10.98
1.20
8.64
1.18
11.02
1.20
8.68
1.20
11.07
1.18
8.64
1.20
11.02
1.18
8.67
1.17
11.02
1.20
8.64
1.18
11.02
1.16
8.65
1.20
11.00
11
-------
RunID
84077
84077
84077
84077
84078
84078
84078
84078
84079
84079
84079
84079
84081
84081
84081
84081
84082
84082
84082
84082
84083
84083
84083
84083
84084
84084
84084
84084
84086
84086
84086
84086
84087
84087
84087
84087
84088
84088
84088
84088
84090
84090
84090
84090
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.83
0.04
0.04
0.08
1.35
0.05
0.07
0.12
18.29
1.67
2.94
2.60
5.04
2.07
3.30
2.31
0.52
0.02
0.10
0.05
0.98
0.03
0.08
0.09
1.69
0.02
0.08
0.11
1.50
0.03
0.03
0.10
1.72
0.03
0.04
0.12
2.10
0.10
0.35
0.22
1.63
0.02
0.14
0.11
BKI
0.89
0.03
0.02
0.07
1.47
0.05
0.04
0.12
15.83
1.01
2.34
1.86
5.35
2.10
3.55
2.36
0.73
0.02
0.07
0.06
1.05
0.03
0.05
0.09
1.90
0.02
0.08
0.12
1.55
0.03
0.01
0.10
1.78
0.02
0.03
0.11
2.13
0.11
0.36
0.23
1.93
0.02
0.16
0.13
CO (g/m)
SMT
6.77
3.24
0.66
3.24
16.17
1.52
1.48
2.27
386.54
88.08
61.31
101.49
36.90
14.75
21.86
16.38
3.16
0.29
1.80
0.55
13.43
2.32
2.35
2.89
13.45
0.31
1.37
1.07
6.64
1.17
0.25
1.36
10.70
0.74
0.69
1.26
11.66
1.56
3.65
2.23
11.37
0.65
2.18
1.31
BKI
6.80
3.17
0.44
3.17
16.79
2.05
1.27
2.75
271.47
52.66
51.17
63.78
34.95
13.29
20.33
14.89
3.80
0.16
1.59
0.44
13.30
2.61
2.02
3.12
14.14
0.24
1.12
1.02
6.89
1.13
0.06
1.33
10.34
0.62
0.48
1.11
11.37
1.70
3.47
2.32
11.62
0.53
2.01
1.21
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.33
0.12
0.24
0.19
1.58
0.24
0.26
0.31
0.92
1.65
2.01
1.64
7.10
6.44
7.04
6.51
0.21
0.10
0.09
0.11
0.88
0.18
0.04
0.20
2.70
0.64
0.47
0.74
0.77
0.07
0.12
0.10
1.18
0.35
0.47
0.40
3.44
1.24
1.08
1.35
1.58
0.26
0.72
0.36
BKI
1.56
0.12
0.24
0.20
1.73
0.23
0.27
0.31
0.96
0.92
1.71
0.98
6.88
5.54
7.07
5.71
0.21
0.10
0.09
0.11
0.81
0.16
0.03
0.18
2.64
0.54
0.43
0.65
0.88
0.07
0.14
0.11
1.08
0.31
0.42
0.35
2.55
0.42
0.43
0.53
1.35
0.26
0.76
0.35
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
442.15
235.64
327.15
252.50
633.67
323.25
535.53
353.85
704.67
673.70
676.51
675.47
658.16
400.34
556.98
424.33
762.61
414.55
614.18
446.18
655.20
332.82
559.66
365.09
673.20
367.67
560.65
396.86
1009.42
503.47
614.67
535.43
665.10
350.55
575.65
382.21
692.20
382.31
595.54
413.00
727.62
435.30
558.00
458.94
BKI
435.48
248.02
329.13
263.19
616.78
357.64
492.73
380.25
502.85
351.55
478.69
368.01
653.31
384.22
544.60
409.04
793.14
426.49
593.51
456.78
583.79
345.71
472.03
366.75
683.10
388.32
528.13
413.29
1007.97
469.96
617.44
505.90
624.05
371.50
514.68
394.33
687.52
420.79
587.04
446.05
753.58
441.95
584.52
467.92
PM2.5
(mg/m)
2.81
0.75
0.88
0.87
0.02
0.51
0.98
0.51
286.59
19.72
6.42
32.48
5.45
1.28
0.54
1.44
3.69
0.71
3.12
1.03
4.18
0.62
0.75
0.81
0.66
0.66
0.80
0.67
15.26
2.14
0.63
2.66
11.26
1.30
0.50
1.76
1.98
1.20
1.61
1.27
4.23
0.50
-0.07
0.65
Distance
(miles)
1.17
8.65
1.18
11.00
1.17
8.63
1.19
10.99
1.16
8.59
1.17
10.93
1.18
8.64
1.17
10.99
1.17
8.64
1.18
10.99
1.18
8.63
1.19
11.00
1.19
8.63
1.19
11.00
1.07
8.56
1.19
10.82
1.18
8.65
1.18
11.01
1.18
8.63
1.18
11.00
1.19
8.69
1.20
11.08
12
-------
RunID
84091
84091
84091
84091
84092
84092
84092
84092
84093
84093
84093
84093
84094
84094
84094
84094
84096
84096
84096
84096
84097
84097
84097
84097
84098
84098
84098
84098
84099
84099
84099
84099
84101
84101
84101
84101
84102
84102
84102
84102
84103
84103
84103
84103
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
3.73
0.05
0.27
0.26
0.80
0.01
0.05
0.05
1.49
0.05
0.46
0.15
2.70
0.13
0.45
0.28
5.19
0.57
2.69
0.95
0.93
0.01
0.03
0.06
2.00
0.05
0.26
0.16
3.62
0.11
0.31
0.30
3.09
0.43
0.43
0.56
1.25
0.11
0.21
0.18
2.02
0.05
0.17
0.16
BKI
3.85
0.07
0.30
0.28
0.88
0.02
0.06
0.07
1.61
0.04
1.01
0.19
3.26
0.12
0.49
0.30
6.00
0.58
3.27
1.04
1.14
0.02
0.04
0.08
2.14
0.04
0.26
0.16
3.93
0.11
0.32
0.32
3.21
0.41
0.42
0.55
1.31
0.12
0.23
0.19
2.28
0.05
0.19
0.17
CO (g/m)
SMT
59.03
2.55
4.40
5.61
8.00
0.11
0.38
0.54
4.33
1.33
2.16
1.54
29.38
8.49
10.01
9.66
28.90
8.29
24.81
10.44
1.34
0.23
0.55
0.31
13.20
0.87
2.38
1.61
13.82
1.16
1.80
1.85
40.75
26.39
13.98
26.29
16.79
6.72
6.65
7.23
9.47
0.52
1.95
1.08
BKI
59.71
2.45
3.80
5.52
8.43
0.06
0.19
0.50
4.56
1.30
1.84
1.50
29.14
7.20
8.42
8.40
29.00
8.20
22.80
10.25
1.22
0.12
0.46
0.20
13.85
0.62
1.76
1.38
14.01
1.04
1.49
1.74
39.65
22.57
11.78
22.72
15.58
6.69
6.38
7.13
10.19
0.41
1.72
1.00
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.62
0.82
1.32
0.84
1.74
0.93
1.00
0.97
1.35
0.64
0.69
0.68
4.06
2.37
2.65
2.47
3.31
1.82
1.78
1.89
0.63
0.07
0.02
0.09
2.18
0.31
0.31
0.41
2.87
0.25
0.71
0.42
4.96
2.41
2.94
2.58
3.12
0.53
0.58
0.67
1.86
0.47
0.73
0.56
BKI
0.56
0.69
1.22
0.72
1.56
0.84
0.91
0.88
1.26
0.56
0.59
0.60
3.76
1.75
2.30
1.89
3.37
1.52
1.58
1.62
0.67
0.06
0.03
0.09
1.90
0.27
0.36
0.36
2.67
0.22
0.62
0.38
4.46
1.98
2.61
2.16
2.83
0.46
0.55
0.59
1.82
0.39
0.66
0.48
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
893.49
481.64
748.61
521.32
511.66
262.28
413.34
285.43
650.56
306.70
458.20
334.93
788.53
496.61
659.61
522.59
723.71
480.22
698.98
507.19
723.43
408.18
482.71
429.70
767.51
439.63
619.62
468.78
742.87
341.81
545.80
376.14
636.89
353.81
530.93
380.55
388.21
234.09
296.33
246.24
679.39
399.77
535.91
423.43
BKI
859.77
484.44
708.24
519.31
489.37
298.65
378.78
313.93
630.15
344.45
448.33
366.35
805.57
481.35
665.20
510.49
761.18
461.38
612.32
486.87
743.59
408.34
545.77
435.30
770.11
456.43
621.82
483.86
729.78
383.52
540.10
411.83
599.91
360.17
485.53
381.24
380.64
240.12
321.70
252.93
705.38
398.24
548.69
424.34
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.51
0.95
1.40
1.01
2.65
1.27
2.31
1.41
3.27
1.19
1.07
1.29
1.56
2.08
1.57
2.02
14.14
4.40
7.42
5.10
4.07
0.45
2.45
0.78
3.05
0.34
1.53
0.56
14.89
2.76
1.62
3.30
38.03
9.07
3.04
10.17
2.67
0.56
0.66
0.68
2.21
0.33
0.28
0.42
Distance
(miles)
1.18
8.61
1.18
10.98
1.17
8.65
1.18
11.00
1.18
8.61
1.18
10.97
1.16
8.64
1.18
10.98
1.16
8.67
1.17
11.01
1.20
8.64
1.18
11.02
1.18
8.64
1.17
10.99
1.16
8.59
1.16
10.91
1.20
8.69
1.19
11.07
1.17
8.65
1.19
11.00
1.17
8.65
1.18
11.01
13
-------
RunID
84104
84104
84104
84104
84105
84105
84105
84105
84107
84107
84107
84107
84108
84108
84108
84108
84109
84109
84109
84109
84110
84110
84110
84110
84111
84111
84111
84111
84115
84115
84115
84115
84116
84116
84116
84116
84119
84119
84119
84119
84121
84121
84121
84121
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
2.04
0.06
0.28
0.18
3.12
0.15
0.28
0.31
2.44
0.10
0.46
0.25
3.34
0.48
1.21
0.68
1.95
0.05
0.26
0.16
1.79
0.06
0.56
0.19
1.71
0.07
0.36
0.18
2.19
0.09
0.36
0.22
1.89
0.09
0.47
0.21
3.82
1.37
2.43
1.57
0.92
0.01
0.07
0.06
BKI
2.29
0.05
0.27
0.18
3.18
0.16
0.28
0.32
2.86
0.10
0.48
0.27
2.66
0.49
1.09
0.64
2.10
0.05
0.27
0.17
1.87
0.06
0.64
0.19
1.83
0.06
0.30
0.17
2.29
0.08
0.68
0.23
2.20
0.06
0.43
0.20
4.87
1.56
3.05
1.83
1.05
0.02
0.09
0.08
CO (g/m)
SMT
10.81
1.43
4.86
2.16
23.16
3.90
2.21
4.77
9.78
3.56
6.10
4.06
30.20
13.03
16.60
14.14
11.78
1.29
4.67
2.07
11.17
4.80
7.34
5.31
14.20
1.76
4.10
2.57
15.30
7.30
9.24
7.84
17.31
1.91
5.29
2.94
27.91
11.80
20.83
13.25
4.65
0.25
0.68
0.50
BKI
11.01
1.45
4.50
2.16
22.03
3.53
1.62
4.36
9.97
3.28
5.48
3.78
21.67
11.64
12.62
12.21
11.53
1.21
4.27
1.96
10.47
4.64
6.16
5.04
13.38
1.57
3.76
2.33
10.85
5.53
7.10
5.92
15.07
1.49
4.91
2.43
32.72
12.07
24.16
13.96
3.82
0.17
0.77
0.39
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.87
0.72
1.01
0.86
2.38
0.46
0.90
0.59
2.59
0.76
0.87
0.86
4.96
3.01
3.58
3.15
2.81
0.75
1.13
0.88
2.21
0.52
0.82
0.63
3.53
0.91
1.10
1.06
1.64
0.49
0.93
0.58
2.98
0.63
0.85
0.77
6.66
5.63
5.44
5.67
1.14
0.01
0.00
0.06
BKI
2.66
0.59
0.86
0.71
2.11
0.43
0.77
0.54
2.39
0.63
0.83
0.73
4.11
2.54
2.98
2.65
2.58
0.62
0.95
0.75
2.06
0.48
0.79
0.58
3.30
0.76
0.97
0.91
2.11
0.59
1.06
0.70
3.44
0.74
1.20
0.91
7.02
5.59
6.19
5.70
1.13
0.02
0.01
0.08
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
746.19
438.74
671.97
470.87
485.44
264.91
411.39
286.23
765.51
422.48
629.22
454.52
620.02
322.89
498.31
349.93
740.65
437.03
666.46
468.47
543.92
325.82
458.33
346.26
687.48
421.53
626.69
449.39
559.47
342.64
453.97
361.49
701.37
443.02
556.87
464.24
794.85
478.00
632.55
504.90
746.76
424.21
607.44
453.09
BKI
753.50
464.06
633.61
490.80
431.15
288.90
353.26
300.67
757.31
421.88
597.25
451.40
494.13
308.32
399.39
323.96
728.32
448.84
622.67
475.23
541.22
330.77
437.36
349.00
698.37
438.99
612.26
464.32
562.20
343.38
455.96
362.39
704.34
443.91
559.89
465.33
798.55
479.23
636.02
506.36
749.90
425.12
609.37
454.15
PM2.5
(mg/m)
3.72
1.53
0.92
1.60
4.88
1.04
0.86
1.22
8.85
3.78
2.04
3.92
11.57
2.76
-0.21
3.00
3.34
1.06
0.13
1.11
4.03
9.31
23.99
10.05
47.71
1.78
1.05
4.11
7.18
7.87
5.12
7.64
3.13
1.80
1.28
1.83
-2.48
7.18
-0.65
6.14
0.26
0.76
-0.02
0.68
Distance
(miles)
1.19
8.64
1.19
11.02
1.18
8.63
1.18
10.99
1.19
8.66
1.19
11.03
1.15
8.64
1.18
10.97
1.18
8.62
1.18
10.98
1.18
8.65
1.19
11.02
1.20
8.74
1.20
11.14
1.17
8.64
1.19
11.00
1.18
8.65
1.20
11.03
1.17
8.65
1.19
11.00
1.15
8.60
1.17
10.92
14
-------
RunID
84122
84122
84122
84122
84123
84123
84123
84123
84126
84126
84126
84126
84128
84128
84128
84128
84129
84129
84129
84129
84131
84131
84131
84131
84132
84132
84132
84132
84133
84133
84133
84133
84134
84134
84134
84134
84135
84135
84135
84135
84137
84137
84137
84137
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.82
0.04
0.16
0.14
1.98
0.78
0.99
0.85
4.01
0.55
1.35
0.78
2.41
0.11
0.27
0.24
2.08
0.11
0.09
0.21
1.64
0.05
0.12
0.14
3.83
0.70
2.46
0.99
1.74
0.05
0.27
0.15
2.87
0.08
0.40
0.25
4.33
0.17
0.39
0.40
1.63
0.28
1.07
0.40
BKI
2.18
0.04
0.21
0.17
2.11
0.82
1.15
0.91
4.62
0.57
1.47
0.84
2.66
0.10
0.27
0.24
2.43
0.13
0.10
0.24
1.88
0.05
0.14
0.15
4.41
0.74
2.89
1.08
1.92
0.03
0.33
0.15
3.76
0.07
0.36
0.28
4.81
0.18
0.38
0.43
4.19
0.77
2.19
1.04
CO (g/m)
SMT
13.77
0.51
1.22
1.25
34.72
26.81
17.38
26.57
30.80
8.76
11.55
10.08
16.95
1.92
2.69
2.74
26.68
1.86
1.74
3.12
23.79
3.34
3.44
4.41
27.37
10.30
25.35
12.24
12.34
0.36
4.30
1.25
29.01
7.83
13.75
9.34
37.49
2.79
4.90
4.70
10.04
3.50
8.33
4.17
BKI
14.61
0.42
2.58
1.31
28.94
26.05
22.33
25.94
26.36
10.63
12.48
11.56
17.95
2.25
2.02
3.03
30.13
1.82
1.98
3.27
21.68
2.78
2.29
3.73
27.16
9.14
28.65
11.43
12.22
0.25
5.72
1.25
29.02
6.74
12.43
8.29
37.59
3.19
4.40
5.02
22.93
8.89
16.73
10.16
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.96
0.24
0.49
0.35
1.10
1.00
1.18
1.02
2.87
1.48
1.13
1.53
2.22
0.29
0.69
0.41
1.33
0.32
0.35
0.38
2.25
0.44
0.55
0.55
3.49
2.24
2.20
2.30
2.19
0.20
0.18
0.30
2.73
1.56
2.04
1.66
3.77
0.42
0.52
0.59
0.99
0.53
0.91
0.58
BKI
2.17
0.22
0.53
0.34
1.14
1.03
1.14
1.04
3.77
1.64
1.30
1.73
2.37
0.31
0.86
0.45
1.45
0.37
0.52
0.43
2.56
0.46
0.80
0.59
3.84
2.36
2.87
2.47
2.57
0.23
0.21
0.35
2.82
1.49
2.32
1.61
3.71
0.39
0.50
0.57
3.56
2.27
2.84
2.37
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
736.43
442.77
615.12
469.83
416.18
251.14
317.55
264.32
772.66
480.96
624.38
505.74
691.05
376.60
475.81
399.38
526.74
351.80
476.05
368.91
625.03
340.32
435.26
361.60
691.82
441.05
535.14
460.73
737.44
410.83
571 .26
438.83
817.17
493.87
708.48
525.48
622.05
327.25
482.32
352.89
298.13
159.78
294.90
176.30
BKI
739.78
443.67
617.51
470.91
417.92
251.75
318.39
264.99
775.82
482.23
627.24
507.19
694.92
377.44
477.66
400.40
528.68
352.44
478.70
369.72
627.89
340.89
436.58
362.30
693.33
441.81
536.59
461.58
741.14
411.59
573.95
439.81
850.61
487.13
688.14
519.88
602.30
368.51
462.73
386.86
675.31
444.00
550.24
463.33
PM2.5
(mg/m)
5.23
1.68
0.86
1.81
3.95
3.52
2.56
3.47
9.73
2.59
2.27
2.93
10.36
4.28
1.60
4.40
10.27
2.21
0.27
2.49
1.85
2.33
0.40
2.17
15.18
3.57
6.38
4.38
3.09
0.69
1.43
0.86
6.24
1.89
0.43
2.02
16.34
1.37
2.69
2.22
6.11
4.55
2.02
4.46
Distance
(miles)
1.18
8.62
1.18
10.98
1.18
8.67
1.21
11.06
1.17
8.67
1.19
11.02
1.16
8.63
1.17
10.95
1.15
8.56
1.12
10.83
1.18
8.59
1.17
10.94
1.22
8.73
1.19
11.15
1.18
8.62
1.18
10.99
1.20
8.70
1.19
11.09
1.15
8.60
1.18
10.93
1.20
8.73
1.20
11.13
15
-------
RunID
84140
84140
84140
84140
84145
84145
84145
84145
84146
84146
84146
84146
84148
84148
84148
84148
84149
84149
84149
84149
84150
84150
84150
84150
84151
84151
84151
84151
84153
84153
84153
84153
84154
84154
84154
84154
84156
84156
84156
84156
84157
84157
84157
84157
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.00
0.03
0.03
0.08
4.53
0.85
1.97
1.12
5.19
1.15
3.46
1.51
13.31
0.83
6.97
1.91
0.80
0.02
0.03
0.07
2.09
0.06
0.05
0.16
1.07
0.03
0.04
0.08
1.46
0.03
0.17
0.11
36.04
22.30
21.18
23.02
0.94
0.07
0.04
0.11
4.52
0.27
0.19
0.49
BKI
1.19
0.03
0.03
0.09
4.76
0.86
2.16
1.15
4.61
0.87
2.61
1.18
7.24
0.65
3.10
1.16
1.14
0.02
0.01
0.08
2.12
0.06
0.04
0.16
1.09
0.04
0.03
0.09
1.71
0.02
0.17
0.12
24.65
11.10
14.65
12.04
1.06
0.06
0.02
0.11
3.84
0.25
0.55
0.46
CO (g/m)
SMT
6.47
0.75
0.30
1.02
49.57
12.27
20.74
14.79
21.48
12.03
18.40
12.94
57.86
7.28
116.69
17.53
3.44
0.59
0.16
0.71
17.78
4.08
1.89
4.60
9.32
1.48
1.93
1.92
10.13
0.25
1.44
0.83
385.29
167.55
128.56
177.32
7.32
5.06
2.00
4.96
22.48
5.57
1.84
6.19
BKI
6.66
0.74
0.15
1.01
48.86
11.15
19.89
13.71
16.88
9.26
11.28
9.78
27.15
5.19
24.27
7.67
4.68
0.53
0.02
0.71
14.60
4.11
1.27
4.44
8.56
3.15
1.57
3.32
10.20
0.07
1.20
0.66
252.57
104.83
104.03
112.41
7.47
4.73
1.46
4.64
16.70
4.98
5.61
5.64
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.51
0.23
0.02
0.23
2.97
2.34
2.64
2.39
4.70
1.78
2.35
1.97
9.74
4.17
3.57
4.42
0.16
0.07
0.05
0.07
1.31
0.33
0.36
0.38
1.43
0.15
0.09
0.21
1.00
0.48
0.23
0.49
4.90
6.96
4.47
6.65
1.25
0.19
0.12
0.24
2.60
0.72
0.46
0.80
BKI
0.50
0.21
0.02
0.21
2.72
2.00
2.42
2.07
4.24
1.45
1.89
1.62
4.25
3.17
6.12
3.43
0.24
0.08
0.05
0.09
1.47
0.31
0.37
0.37
1.38
0.15
0.07
0.21
0.89
0.39
0.19
0.40
4.21
4.69
3.42
4.58
1.26
0.17
0.10
0.22
2.55
0.67
1.41
0.82
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
847.47
421.90
653.78
460.13
412.36
266.72
376.55
281.88
708.18
422.89
666.57
453.86
2986.14
402.84
336.26
533.70
488.88
271.66
428.21
293.88
863.68
477.44
687.09
511.06
685.41
340.11
576.08
373.98
854.42
548.14
694.98
573.64
1101.41
935.44
766.04
932.19
664.98
327.45
567.46
361.58
480.94
286.72
70.73
281.97
BKI
850.53
473.66
647.27
505.35
411.73
264.00
378.50
279.58
583.89
357.36
468.84
376.33
623.53
410.74
516.52
429.21
556.24
323.19
414.37
341.68
842.34
478.36
690.02
511.43
628.53
377.71
512.45
399.82
864.09
543.41
693.49
569.86
773.18
553.38
537.18
563.62
638.42
370.29
499.16
393.14
417.84
285.45
356.38
297.23
PM2.5
(mg/m)
3.39
0.91
-1.13
0.90
3.60
1.16
1.35
1.30
6.76
10.20
-1.96
9.20
51.84
47.58
25.61
46.28
4.63
0.71
0.85
0.92
12.89
4.15
6.36
4.74
7.47
1.34
-0.97
1.50
32.37
5.42
6.72
6.87
163.38
80.53
15.38
80.35
7.92
1.69
2.43
2.07
7.76
2.45
5.67
2.95
Distance
(miles)
1.19
8.60
1.19
10.99
1.19
8.66
1.20
11.05
1.14
8.62
1.17
10.93
1.20
8.67
1.20
11.07
1.20
8.68
1.20
11.07
1.15
8.61
1.19
10.95
1.17
8.67
1.18
11.03
1.15
8.58
1.16
10.88
1.15
8.44
1.15
10.74
1.19
8.66
1.19
11.05
1.19
8.66
1.19
11.04
16
-------
RunID
84160
84160
84160
84160
84161
84161
84161
84161
84162
84162
84162
84162
84164
84164
84164
84164
84165
84165
84165
84165
84166
84166
84166
84166
84168
84168
84168
84168
84169
84169
84169
84169
84171
84171
84171
84171
84172
84172
84172
84172
84173
84173
84173
84173
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.16
0.07
0.05
0.13
3.50
0.06
0.07
0.23
4.29
0.46
0.39
0.65
2.46
0.05
0.17
0.18
7.62
3.15
5.89
3.57
3.31
0.16
0.67
0.36
1.77
0.03
0.12
0.12
2.35
0.11
0.57
0.26
29.32
1.29
2.22
2.77
1.96
0.29
0.53
0.39
5.14
0.16
0.55
0.45
BKI
1.34
0.06
0.04
0.12
3.70
0.06
0.08
0.25
3.64
0.30
0.33
0.47
2.61
0.05
0.16
0.19
6.94
3.08
4.70
3.39
3.44
0.13
0.69
0.34
2.07
0.02
0.24
0.14
2.69
0.09
0.69
0.27
4.16
0.99
1.42
1.18
4.33
0.22
0.48
0.45
5.88
0.14
0.60
0.47
CO (g/m)
SMT
4.13
2.32
0.62
2.29
7.71
0.64
0.44
0.99
153.51
22.28
4.32
27.86
17.69
0.49
2.71
1.54
32.92
12.76
15.87
14.02
19.72
7.20
7.08
7.82
15.42
1.34
1.90
2.11
20.01
5.17
6.50
6.02
196.69
19.86
23.84
29.06
6.71
6.59
8.86
6.75
15.96
4.68
6.27
5.38
BKI
4.48
2.06
0.40
2.07
7.74
0.66
0.10
0.98
129.37
19.31
4.14
23.98
18.20
0.39
2.34
1.46
27.26
12.17
12.44
12.96
19.11
6.45
6.23
7.07
14.06
1.21
2.55
1.97
17.76
3.94
6.08
4.80
22.67
14.54
12.33
14.79
22.34
4.66
6.59
5.72
16.33
4.46
6.02
5.18
NOx (g/m)
SMT
0.46
0.41
0.18
0.39
0.81
0.76
0.52
0.75
2.88
1.26
1.18
1.34
1.95
0.16
0.35
0.27
5.42
4.66
5.37
4.75
2.97
1.22
1.71
1.35
1.80
0.68
1.01
0.76
2.26
1.04
1.02
1.10
12.97
1.48
2.00
2.09
0.16
0.83
0.65
0.78
2.54
1.07
1.23
1.16
BKI
0.51
0.35
0.15
0.35
1.03
0.78
0.62
0.78
2.60
0.69
0.96
0.81
1.98
0.16
0.34
0.26
4.93
4.34
4.86
4.40
2.96
1.11
1.70
1.24
2.01
0.67
1.17
0.78
3.04
1.17
1.44
1.28
2.46
1.30
1.44
1.37
2.43
0.87
0.65
0.93
2.65
1.02
1.22
1.12
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
715.35
362.19
562.52
394.08
847.26
448.39
583.50
478.11
713.69
721.88
577.64
711.57
696.78
376.62
595.32
408.60
542.84
301.38
440.77
323.41
695.81
405.86
567.18
431.62
738.23
417.32
582.46
445.32
696.15
401.34
522.52
424.72
2314.63
341.43
495.09
451.70
86.29
490.58
539.56
472.75
615.91
333.19
472.36
357.56
BKI
647.40
361.46
449.32
382.20
850.38
449.99
585.81
479.84
653.94
401.99
516.93
422.92
710.32
428.71
582.72
454.16
479.72
299.36
374.54
313.81
693.40
411.80
543.06
435.04
740.83
418.73
584.72
446.85
698.60
402.66
524.54
426.15
413.44
266.39
317.61
277.37
686.25
404.58
539.31
428.61
644.76
350.11
512.46
376.71
PM2.5
(mg/m)
1.29
0.48
1.93
0.62
18.97
6.22
1.30
6.52
15.11
27.92
2.82
25.54
7.83
0.99
-0.59
1.23
30.51
19.93
3.96
19.37
2.08
0.37
3.13
0.65
2.11
0.21
-1.03
0.23
0.67
0.14
-1.04
0.09
44.50
42.99
10.22
40.79
27.09
13.58
2.26
13.51
16.77
0.75
-1.95
1.39
Distance
(miles)
1.18
8.64
1.18
11.00
1.15
8.62
1.21
10.99
1.18
8.58
1.17
10.93
1.20
8.72
1.22
11.15
1.17
8.59
1.18
10.94
1.15
8.63
1.18
10.96
1.20
8.69
1.19
11.08
1.17
8.64
1.18
10.98
1.14
8.60
1.19
10.93
1.20
8.65
1.18
11.03
1.18
8.57
1.19
10.94
17
-------
RunID
84174
84174
84174
84174
84175
84175
84175
84175
84177
84177
84177
84177
84178
84178
84178
84178
84179
84179
84179
84179
84180
84180
84180
84180
84182
84182
84182
84182
84183
84183
84183
84183
84184
84184
84184
84184
84185
84185
84185
84185
84187
84187
84187
84187
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
4.18
0.12
0.46
0.36
6.07
0.90
2.89
1.31
5.13
2.06
3.33
2.31
2.07
0.10
0.38
0.22
2.32
0.36
0.64
0.48
5.18
0.98
2.79
1.32
4.19
0.35
0.98
0.71
1.95
0.04
0.27
0.15
1.40
0.10
0.03
0.16
2.54
0.21
0.46
0.34
5.09
2.06
3.28
2.30
BKI
4.71
0.10
0.46
0.37
6.29
0.84
2.74
1.26
5.34
2.07
3.59
2.35
2.20
0.10
0.41
0.23
2.38
0.36
0.63
0.49
5.61
0.97
2.73
1.33
4.40
0.20
0.98
0.47
1.94
0.04
0.18
0.14
1.37
0.09
0.02
0.15
2.70
0.21
0.48
0.36
5.34
2.13
3.51
2.39
CO (g/m)
SMT
7.34
1.80
2.74
2.16
33.70
5.69
21.83
8.27
33.65
14.02
21.98
15.58
12.36
2.30
4.33
2.96
20.13
6.58
8.22
7.40
19.27
9.25
16.47
10.27
63.05
16.00
23.14
20.37
12.08
1.09
4.52
1.89
11.79
8.55
0.83
8.19
14.05
4.87
4.30
5.31
32.64
15.98
20.42
17.16
BKI
7.34
1.27
2.08
1.65
33.67
5.24
20.05
7.75
32.11
13.48
21.63
15.00
12.57
2.02
3.55
2.67
18.41
5.97
6.76
6.67
17.76
8.11
15.03
9.09
65.17
8.46
18.22
12.04
9.77
0.95
3.00
1.54
11.46
7.30
0.56
7.05
13.46
4.44
3.56
4.85
31.23
15.26
20.00
16.43
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.49
1.55
1.47
1.54
2.91
1.94
2.74
2.05
6.88
5.75
6.18
5.84
2.93
0.49
1.05
0.65
3.10
1.45
2.00
1.57
4.44
2.17
2.93
2.34
3.96
2.38
2.97
2.55
1.39
0.50
0.74
0.57
0.35
0.10
0.38
0.13
2.55
0.65
1.08
0.78
7.57
6.99
7.85
7.08
BKI
1.37
1.28
1.34
1.29
2.64
1.59
2.51
1.71
7.07
5.38
6.58
5.55
2.85
0.45
1.02
0.61
2.87
1.15
1.68
1.28
4.04
1.83
2.64
2.00
3.54
1.20
2.35
1.40
1.32
0.54
0.73
0.59
0.31
0.08
0.29
0.11
2.20
0.57
0.84
0.68
7.57
6.37
7.97
6.54
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
882.04
498.61
782.93
538.76
730.00
434.37
594.52
460.86
629.00
372.86
510.40
395.52
650.21
335.72
510.39
363.72
861 .92
473.35
703.93
509.54
708.39
432.86
637.35
461.23
847.85
909.37
869.17
900.91
572.61
267.31
472.88
297.19
574.79
274.22
481.15
303.94
497.80
278.19
429.55
299.76
621 .04
387.53
544.32
410.54
BKI
827.64
498.86
724.27
532.00
701.51
421.83
566.51
446.42
666.30
383.39
535.89
408.46
654.94
374.23
492.40
396.68
824.73
467.44
647.54
498.51
705.50
439.59
608.94
465.02
861.45
529.87
760.09
562.68
525.15
315.09
408.83
332.35
524.72
301.42
414.72
320.72
439.96
297.19
369.98
309.48
659.96
405.57
574.61
430.52
PM2.5
(mg/m)
4.33
4.15
-0.79
3.81
20.52
2.91
0.82
3.69
5.31
1.00
1.20
1.24
8.73
0.77
0.00
1.13
2.21
1.86
2.61
1.93
25.90
8.96
1.44
9.30
25.31
11.48
9.45
12.05
1.53
1.03
-1.78
0.86
3.81
1.91
0.45
1.90
6.16
3.36
0.02
3.28
5.14
1.47
1.34
1.66
Distance
(miles)
1.22
8.68
1.21
11.11
1.19
8.60
1.18
10.97
1.17
8.64
1.19
11.00
1.18
8.63
1.16
10.96
1.20
8.69
1.20
11.09
1.16
8.56
1.19
10.91
1.17
8.63
1.18
10.98
1.17
8.67
1.20
11.04
1.18
8.65
1.19
11.01
1.18
8.62
1.16
10.95
1.20
8.66
1.19
11.05
18
-------
RunID
84188
84188
84188
84188
84189
84189
84189
84189
84191
84191
84191
84191
84192
84192
84192
84192
84193
84193
84193
84193
84195
84195
84195
84195
84196
84196
84196
84196
84197
84197
84197
84197
84198
84198
84198
84198
84200
84200
84200
84200
84201
84201
84201
84201
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
16.17
6.16
5.82
6.68
3.30
2.09
3.52
2.25
2.73
0.18
0.35
0.32
0.73
0.06
0.06
0.09
0.81
0.05
0.04
0.09
0.85
0.03
0.18
0.09
2.03
1.14
1.65
1.23
3.31
0.12
0.60
0.32
3.68
0.18
0.81
0.41
4.10
0.21
0.91
0.46
11.30
5.54
7.14
5.95
BKI
12.95
4.13
5.08
4.67
33.15
16.60
31.09
18.42
2.47
0.08
0.27
0.22
0.76
0.03
0.02
0.07
1.33
0.04
0.02
0.10
1.90
0.02
0.24
0.13
5.90
1.77
2.71
2.06
4.00
0.10
0.70
0.35
3.97
0.18
0.72
0.42
4.62
0.20
0.89
0.48
11.09
5.24
6.77
5.66
CO (g/m)
SMT
207.51
79.78
80.61
86.71
252.83
243.52
373.03
252.90
16.38
1.46
2.82
2.32
5.56
0.91
0.22
1.10
9.78
3.18
3.18
3.52
11.98
0.22
4.32
1.10
60.99
13.07
14.78
15.75
22.30
5.35
9.22
6.51
25.70
2.39
9.00
4.07
34.35
3.49
8.59
5.45
102.78
66.27
132.85
72.76
BKI
163.52
59.19
67.12
65.36
202.14
192.37
272.68
198.38
15.75
1.34
1.94
2.11
6.09
0.88
-0.01
1.09
9.16
2.63
2.51
2.97
11.96
0.13
4.01
1.00
61.44
12.31
12.94
14.98
22.23
5.43
8.38
6.51
25.09
3.50
7.61
4.92
34.84
4.46
7.50
6.26
84.49
74.52
120.34
78.19
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.28
2.73
2.42
2.69
5.25
1.75
2.48
1.98
2.32
0.24
0.71
0.38
0.54
0.18
0.24
0.21
1.82
0.48
0.60
0.56
2.64
0.39
0.37
0.51
5.26
3.27
5.06
3.50
4.48
1.88
3.00
2.09
1.70
0.49
0.75
0.58
1.62
0.62
0.62
0.67
4.56
3.99
3.22
3.97
BKI
2.11
2.09
2.29
2.10
4.34
1.33
1.67
1.51
2.30
0.24
0.70
0.38
0.52
0.17
0.23
0.19
1.90
0.48
0.50
0.56
2.42
0.29
0.29
0.40
4.86
2.81
4.31
3.03
4.49
1.85
2.99
2.07
1.76
0.50
0.72
0.58
1.66
0.61
0.60
0.66
4.26
3.46
3.08
3.47
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
912.05
603.20
693.17
626.10
674.38
401.33
611.33
429.35
642.93
322.72
507.09
351.62
836.69
424.89
638.84
460.46
725.25
373.27
569.65
405.09
692.47
377.03
590.98
407.91
745.97
456.01
652.97
485.34
672.00
328.23
526.75
360.07
543.37
260.98
453.39
289.04
549.39
267.90
445.17
294.91
659.12
413.78
509.68
433.29
BKI
780.49
473.71
611.57
499.83
569.42
325.32
465.91
347.12
631.40
357.76
477.44
379.88
869.81
471.13
639.64
502.92
739.98
407.31
545.96
434.16
702.22
423.12
579.11
448.15
735.04
450.06
593.84
475.38
694.42
394.44
544.68
420.63
561 .76
325.91
449.92
346.82
566.46
335.91
445.80
355.58
617.00
397.26
471.29
413.92
PM2.5
(mg/m)
326.39
25.64
9.66
40.68
662.61
261 .48
345.43
287.15
4.37
2.17
1.11
2.21
0.30
5.90
0.02
5.21
8.90
5.88
2.45
5.80
1.97
0.37
1.47
0.53
1.31
3.96
64.48
8.06
3.62
0.73
1.47
0.93
9.10
1.78
1.05
2.12
15.32
3.15
2.35
3.73
28.36
1.04
147.72
12.54
Distance
(miles)
1.24
8.69
1.21
11.14
1.12
8.56
1.18
10.86
1.17
8.65
1.17
10.99
1.16
8.66
1.18
11.00
1.19
8.67
1.19
11.05
1.17
8.64
1.18
10.99
1.25
8.82
1.24
11.31
1.20
8.64
1.19
11.04
1.20
8.65
1.19
11.04
1.20
8.67
1.21
11.07
1.21
8.68
1.19
11.08
19
-------
RunID
84205
84205
84205
84205
84206
84206
84206
84206
84208
84208
84208
84208
84209
84209
84209
84209
84210
84210
84210
84210
84211
84211
84211
84211
84213
84213
84213
84213
84214
84214
84214
84214
84215
84215
84215
84215
84218
84218
84218
84218
84229
84229
84229
84229
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.36
0.08
0.12
0.15
5.82
0.52
1.63
0.87
7.23
1.84
3.45
2.23
1.44
0.42
0.58
0.48
1.63
0.61
1.20
0.70
1.70
0.32
1.14
0.45
1.95
0.56
1.17
0.68
0.91
0.00
0.02
0.05
1.22
0.04
0.00
0.10
1.30
0.41
0.51
0.46
0.08
0.05
BKI
1.58
0.06
0.11
0.14
5.73
0.45
1.60
0.80
8.00
1.75
3.75
2.21
2.17
0.42
0.52
0.52
5.40
0.50
1.58
0.82
3.01
0.24
1.36
0.46
3.58
0.39
0.96
0.59
2.06
0.04
0.17
0.15
2.72
0.05
0.03
0.19
5.43
2.26
3.80
2.53
2.29
0.03
0.08
0.15
CO (g/m)
SMT
8.20
4.26
3.09
4.38
83.59
9.40
18.18
13.89
60.46
28.50
41.75
31.08
25.25
10.38
15.82
11.52
51.25
9.73
20.38
12.51
40.01
9.25
14.04
11.18
49.63
31.33
19.53
31.47
8.57
1.69
2.55
2.09
14.28
1.90
0.73
2.46
7.36
2.92
2.97
3.15
1.87
1.61
BKI
8.17
3.27
2.77
3.49
83.84
8.52
16.70
13.02
59.79
25.74
39.20
28.44
21.04
12.00
10.00
12.33
47.47
8.97
18.45
11.52
37.27
7.77
12.06
9.59
45.96
22.41
16.38
23.22
8.47
1.51
2.43
1.92
12.92
1.50
0.51
2.03
27.19
13.58
20.05
14.72
23.21
0.19
0.24
1.39
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.25
0.70
0.64
0.77
2.46
0.80
0.93
0.89
7.41
4.49
5.10
4.68
6.85
4.12
6.23
4.41
5.53
3.09
3.48
3.24
2.16
1.12
1.71
1.22
3.21
1.10
1.69
1.25
3.43
0.68
1.27
0.85
4.98
0.65
0.09
0.84
4.48
1.59
1.84
1.75
1.48
0.74
BKI
2.07
0.48
0.50
0.56
1.97
0.57
0.72
0.65
6.36
3.71
4.50
3.90
6.32
3.46
5.76
3.77
4.92
2.74
3.06
2.87
1.94
0.95
1.52
1.04
2.78
0.84
1.37
0.97
2.67
0.50
0.83
0.63
3.99
0.47
0.09
0.63
7.27
6.14
8.01
6.33
3.70
0.31
0.30
0.48
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
910.18
582.16
746.47
610.43
845.60
546.39
753.98
576.25
760.92
487.97
645.47
513.00
714.79
367.44
599.24
401.39
562.56
318.78
460.84
340.46
715.82
406.82
534.52
431.67
881.42
529.62
774.44
564.77
864.38
437.47
783.76
479.04
686.42
414.67
585.37
440.71
214.91
78.14
95.97
86.17
1164.31
812.09
BKI
946.31
571.36
727.23
601 .46
849.19
546.54
728.67
574.84
774.31
472.51
652.55
500.58
632.47
382.70
513.09
404.63
524.53
321 .49
429.59
338.87
682.37
393.29
514.69
416.66
864.66
521.13
701 .66
551 .42
766.77
461.30
670.25
490.94
669.62
427.58
569.96
450.10
668.85
398.89
580.22
425.28
821.41
522.05
608.60
543.76
PM2.5
(mg/m)
16.02
8.61
1.25
8.48
3.07
1.24
1.51
1.36
209.50
42.76
86.98
54.47
3.69
2.15
-1.74
1.96
101.68
7.26
8.66
12.06
14.21
34.91
7.31
31.94
6.10
6.33
2.54
6.06
21.30
6.26
2.19
6.73
3.11
3.98
1.56
3.77
4.59
0.61
1.40
0.87
4.32
7.07
2.82
6.63
Distance
(miles)
1.18
8.69
1.21
11.08
1.19
8.58
1.17
10.94
1.19
8.65
1.18
11.03
1.19
8.67
1.19
11.05
1.13
8.60
1.15
10.88
1.17
8.54
1.17
10.89
1.19
8.64
1.19
11.02
1.14
8.66
1.19
10.99
1.19
8.64
1.20
11.03
1.18
8.61
1.18
10.96
1.20
8.66
1.22
11.08
20
-------
RunID
84242
84242
84242
84242
84244
84244
84244
84244
84245
84245
84245
84245
84246
84246
84246
84246
84250
84250
84250
84250
84252
84252
84252
84252
84253
84253
84253
84253
84256
84256
84256
84256
84257
84257
84257
84257
84258
84258
84258
84258
84259
84259
84259
84259
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
1.25
0.08
0.17
0.15
1.38
0.91
1.14
0.95
1.30
1.11
1.27
1.13
1.59
0.53
0.45
0.58
1.62
0.87
1.36
0.95
0.70
0.09
0.07
0.12
1.06
0.08
0.25
0.14
1.75
0.11
0.57
0.23
1.60
0.27
1.18
0.40
2.30
0.12
0.48
0.26
6.03
2.21
3.42
2.49
BKI
3.00
0.09
0.21
0.25
5.09
1.29
2.29
1.56
3.08
2.89
3.91
2.97
5.07
0.50
0.39
0.73
7.94
2.29
7.34
2.93
1.95
0.06
0.07
0.16
2.15
0.08
0.43
0.21
4.70
0.13
0.88
0.42
4.34
0.26
1.43
0.55
2.66
0.13
0.55
0.29
6.17
2.17
3.54
2.47
CO (g/m)
SMT
13.89
0.54
2.39
1.37
56.83
22.17
12.71
23.32
23.55
27.67
16.58
26.69
18.43
13.35
2.19
12.84
99.65
24.99
95.48
33.67
2.90
1.26
1.06
1.33
27.37
4.54
7.11
5.88
89.04
4.65
16.15
9.99
38.53
4.01
13.71
6.47
8.42
3.40
7.69
3.96
39.86
13.84
21.27
15.68
BKI
13.97
0.52
2.12
1.34
51.87
18.95
11.65
20.15
19.90
18.42
12.14
18.05
18.40
10.76
1.98
10.54
65.43
22.35
61.82
27.26
3.12
1.15
0.94
1.24
25.79
3.76
6.11
5.04
71.54
4.40
16.62
8.86
33.19
3.65
10.98
5.69
8.19
3.68
8.33
4.23
38.12
13.47
21.39
15.28
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.83
0.45
1.01
0.62
3.05
3.04
3.79
3.09
4.38
3.28
4.73
3.44
2.64
1.62
1.84
1.68
3.71
2.66
2.22
2.68
0.47
0.08
0.11
0.11
2.63
0.97
1.43
1.08
2.74
1.47
1.61
1.54
3.48
2.37
4.32
2.56
4.04
1.90
2.27
2.04
6.95
5.82
6.24
5.91
BKI
2.15
0.30
0.73
0.43
3.67
2.89
3.64
2.98
3.31
1.96
3.41
2.13
2.50
1.11
1.50
1.21
3.81
2.52
2.32
2.57
0.39
0.03
0.08
0.06
2.25
0.82
1.27
0.92
2.55
1.36
1.50
1.44
3.25
2.00
3.76
2.19
3.38
1.35
1.82
1.49
7.74
5.95
7.12
6.12
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
701.16
395.38
602.11
425.81
492.42
353.73
426.71
365.96
620.61
572.90
596.02
576.97
710.55
483.74
628.29
505.35
532.42
323.93
433.99
342.18
789.09
433.07
586.89
462.30
731.56
424.73
590.09
451.60
734.37
398.69
619.42
432.05
767.76
441 .52
698.08
476.04
787.33
425.75
624.83
458.31
647.38
380.46
497.51
402.19
BKI
714.87
425.98
582.96
452.08
459.64
314.27
403.22
327.95
521.54
370.19
435.62
382.58
679.23
472.71
621.74
493.75
464.26
303.67
371.83
316.52
804.96
437.71
596.28
467.93
720.26
419.55
557.80
444.32
704.72
417.71
594.94
445.46
678.37
442.26
581.00
464.02
831.13
452.16
620.66
483.61
684.21
392.90
520.83
416.70
PM2.5
(mg/m)
14.47
1.38
-0.33
1.95
8.11
24.58
1.35
22.12
5.74
54.41
6.40
48.53
38.30
23.71
9.94
23.50
14.89
10.32
4.17
10.13
8.28
0.43
-1.09
0.74
5.87
1.23
1.45
1.48
48.11
4.18
0.80
6.31
-1.33
4.49
3.64
4.13
6.93
5.05
0.59
4.84
7.58
0.80
2.00
1.23
Distance
(miles)
1.21
8.66
1.20
11.07
1.19
8.68
1.20
11.07
1.18
8.66
1.22
11.05
1.17
8.59
1.20
10.96
1.14
8.52
1.17
10.83
1.20
8.65
1.19
11.05
1.16
8.64
1.18
10.98
1.25
8.72
1.21
11.17
1.19
8.66
1.18
11.03
1.20
8.65
1.18
11.03
1.18
8.65
1.18
11.01
21
-------
RunID
84261
84261
84261
84261
84262
84262
84262
84262
84263
84263
84263
84263
84265
84265
84265
84265
84266
84266
84266
84266
84267
84267
84267
84267
84268
84268
84268
84268
84270
84270
84270
84270
84271
84271
84271
84271
84272
84272
84272
84272
84274
84274
84274
84274
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
2.07
0.72
1.82
0.87
1.65
0.18
0.58
0.28
1.64
0.81
0.83
0.86
2.82
0.68
2.59
0.92
0.63
0.02
0.01
0.05
1.41
0.14
0.69
0.24
2.28
0.31
1.52
0.50
2.25
0.59
1.02
0.71
2.42
0.75
1.28
0.86
1.12
0.02
0.01
0.08
4.10
0.32
0.71
0.53
BKI
3.62
1.00
2.37
1.22
4.60
0.17
0.65
0.44
4.07
1.05
1.01
1.20
24.96
10.01
14.68
11.11
1.65
0.00
-0.01
0.09
3.01
0.15
0.71
0.34
5.75
0.32
2.06
0.72
4.45
0.69
1.45
0.94
9.51
0.77
1.58
1.28
1.15
0.02
0.01
0.08
3.69
0.31
0.60
0.50
CO (g/m)
SMT
12.68
11.09
10.06
11.10
29.44
7.79
13.54
9.32
59.16
55.04
14.96
52.41
226.45
39.25
168.03
57.84
3.23
0.25
0.12
0.40
35.85
4.13
6.71
5.95
26.78
1.23
12.29
3.31
26.13
11.29
12.65
12.16
63.71
10.56
10.84
13.26
9.15
0.55
0.98
1.03
19.27
7.87
4.79
8.24
BKI
13.44
11.67
10.61
11.69
26.27
6.97
11.95
8.32
56.59
44.09
14.04
42.59
200.03
129.88
118.87
132.78
3.42
0.14
-0.07
0.30
32.69
3.94
5.93
5.56
25.97
0.71
10.75
2.72
25.23
10.19
11.97
11.10
51.86
9.52
10.48
11.80
9.72
0.67
0.71
1.14
17.13
7.03
3.30
7.29
NOx (g/m)
SMT
3.89
1.72
3.20
1.93
2.95
1.69
2.28
1.80
7.49
2.25
4.43
2.68
2.31
0.53
2.09
0.73
0.82
0.08
0.19
0.13
3.09
1.12
1.89
1.28
4.83
4.49
5.75
4.59
3.95
1.76
1.96
1.89
8.65
9.18
9.58
9.17
0.77
0.04
0.09
0.08
3.14
2.04
2.61
2.14
BKI
4.07
1.79
3.25
2.00
2.79
1.56
0.81
1.57
7.53
2.18
3.97
2.58
2.58
1.12
1.59
1.23
0.93
0.08
0.23
0.14
2.86
1.05
1.71
1.19
4.45
3.69
4.91
3.81
3.88
1.58
1.84
1.71
7.78
7.45
8.19
7.51
0.90
0.03
0.07
0.08
2.83
1.80
2.07
1.87
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
327.84
138.23
237.16
154.42
779.85
431.32
640.75
463.88
602.51
365.17
503.76
387.27
836.88
243.91
907.52
320.45
604.08
290.47
487.99
320.85
702.52
332.97
560.70
367.62
949.25
599.79
771.92
629.69
824.57
474.39
647.65
504.60
863.85
516.64
637.21
540.77
742.88
375.97
582.88
409.29
567.10
263.23
457.56
292.09
BKI
354.63
152.96
256.62
170.06
792.37
457.31
627.91
486.53
596.23
378.89
466.64
396.37
771.55
486.25
697.45
515.74
571.90
339.48
457.67
359.95
605.76
352.50
489.06
374.95
931.87
554.46
729.75
586.28
841.95
463.99
665.12
497.67
807.49
482.49
588.64
505.67
707.71
399.27
527.90
424.22
485.33
292.17
348.10
305.88
PM2.5
(mg/m)
20.40
9.14
6.91
9.55
7.33
3.30
1.23
3.36
60.10
18.28
7.37
19.66
86.02
166.92
33.45
153.49
5.55
2.13
1.08
2.24
9.53
3.28
2.70
3.57
23.54
27.18
8.25
25.69
14.32
26.61
5.05
24.48
57.37
2.81
3.35
5.70
6.58
1.66
1.89
1.93
32.42
4.25
2.00
5.53
Distance
(miles)
1.15
8.71
1.17
11.03
1.19
8.63
1.19
11.01
1.18
8.63
1.23
11.04
1.19
8.61
1.19
10.99
1.22
8.74
1.21
11.17
1.18
8.63
1.18
10.98
1.21
8.75
1.20
11.16
1.21
8.75
1.21
11.17
1.21
8.69
0.97
10.87
1.19
8.67
1.20
11.06
1.16
8.63
1.19
10.98
22
-------
RunID
84276
84276
84276
84276
84277
84277
84277
84277
84278
84278
84278
84278
84279
84279
84279
84279
84280
84280
84280
84280
84281
84281
84281
84281
84283
84283
84283
84283
84284
84284
84284
84284
84285
84285
84285
84285
84286
84286
84286
84286
84287
84287
84287
84287
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
2.64
0.04
0.49
0.20
28.38
18.34
28.16
19.51
5.62
0.24
1.66
0.61
0.60
0.06
0.08
0.09
1.08
0.02
0.03
0.08
4.87
0.19
0.88
0.49
27.02
6.15
14.31
7.79
5.41
1.01
4.13
1.46
0.84
0.08
0.01
0.12
1.87
0.05
0.96
0.20
7.18
0.84
1.42
1.20
BKI
2.75
0.04
0.46
0.21
23.77
13.03
26.65
14.49
5.59
0.19
1.72
0.57
1.25
0.05
0.08
0.11
1.11
0.02
0.04
0.08
4.59
0.19
0.89
0.47
23.07
4.07
14.11
5.75
5.28
0.85
4.02
1.31
1.09
0.08
0.02
0.13
2.64
0.04
0.84
0.23
4.72
0.38
0.97
0.64
CO (g/m)
SMT
13.37
1.53
9.03
2.67
407.51
288.70
441.69
304.96
88.74
5.78
23.87
11.29
4.13
5.93
0.74
5.48
16.29
2.57
3.12
3.34
77.37
8.03
22.92
12.69
328.09
88.20
175.73
106.71
58.24
36.54
77.01
40.52
6.34
6.26
1.50
5.94
28.38
2.59
25.50
5.43
47.15
9.48
20.27
12.12
BKI
11.83
1.50
7.85
2.48
182.70
145.32
175.14
149.22
84.34
5.47
23.07
10.73
4.42
4.27
0.51
4.02
13.17
2.34
2.73
2.93
72.81
6.77
19.90
11.12
306.28
58.54
162.76
78.62
48.77
24.98
69.34
29.33
7.59
5.92
1.48
5.70
27.59
2.37
24.85
5.15
30.33
5.79
13.80
7.57
NOx (g/m)
SMT
2.73
1.29
1.43
1.38
1.42
1.21
0.74
1.19
1.88
0.71
0.36
0.74
0.85
0.16
0.23
0.20
1.63
0.65
0.60
0.70
5.27
1.36
1.29
1.56
1.72
2.50
1.76
2.41
7.17
5.67
5.09
5.71
1.03
0.07
0.10
0.12
5.61
2.15
8.09
2.72
3.68
2.65
2.21
2.67
BKI
2.54
1.03
1.24
1.12
1.53
1.00
0.88
1.02
1.87
0.59
0.26
0.63
1.01
0.12
0.23
0.18
1.63
0.60
0.55
0.65
4.79
1.02
1.02
1.22
1.79
1.64
1.62
1.65
6.73
4.49
4.11
4.58
1.26
0.07
0.08
0.14
4.98
1.71
6.71
2.21
3.06
1.46
1.60
1.55
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
852.63
434.43
692.53
474.20
689.78
490.81
582.32
507.06
618.90
423.10
528.23
440.40
768.47
407.43
660.58
443.29
469.86
283.98
447.92
305.53
1029.78
679.69
897.81
713.07
582.77
684.68
451.80
663.41
832.99
523.02
763.71
556.28
483.66
272.92
440.31
295.44
847.06
507.13
856.70
547.65
902.88
706.77
773.39
721.21
BKI
810.33
432.97
617.44
465.55
383.25
257.17
285.13
265.49
616.14
405.79
518.67
424.36
798.12
435.95
621.07
467.22
446.57
299.70
397.93
314.33
976.74
621.70
816.85
653.66
540.81
425.12
406.45
429.87
773.46
489.24
666.60
516.67
524.68
318.32
447.43
337.93
829.06
489.64
862.91
531.74
721.90
463.90
633.25
488.37
PM2.5
(mg/m)
13.54
1.29
1.37
1.93
250.94
266.07
200.66
260.93
40.24
10.44
3.22
11.48
3.32
4.95
3.30
4.75
3.07
0.90
1.27
1.04
9.19
10.37
3.80
9.86
180.44
69.56
28.77
72.54
20.33
80.00
15.13
72.32
6.17
1.87
0.00
1.96
4.49
2.66
4.03
2.84
19.71
51.96
21.98
48.31
Distance
(miles)
1.19
8.64
1.21
11.04
1.17
8.66
1.15
10.98
1.17
8.61
1.18
10.96
1.17
8.62
1.17
10.97
1.23
8.80
1.24
11.26
1.20
8.64
1.18
11.02
1.19
8.62
1.18
11.00
1.21
8.63
1.20
11.04
1.19
8.67
1.19
11.05
1.19
8.69
1.13
11.02
1.15
8.60
1.15
10.90
23
-------
RunID
84289
84289
84289
84289
84290
84290
84290
84290
84291
84291
84291
84291
84292
84292
84292
84292
84293
84293
84293
84293
84295
84295
84295
84295
84296
84296
84296
84296
84297
84297
84297
84297
84298
84298
84298
84298
84300
84300
84300
84300
84301
84301
84301
84301
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
10.71
4.78
13.24
5.66
5.07
2.10
3.43
2.34
1.91
0.11
0.26
0.21
2.34
0.17
0.30
0.29
6.78
0.83
2.24
1.23
23.48
7.02
10.59
8.09
0.53
0.05
0.04
0.08
2.57
0.24
0.30
0.37
2.25
0.13
0.39
0.26
2.15
0.05
0.22
0.17
16.60
4.16
8.65
5.12
BKI
10.32
4.12
11.68
4.96
5.20
2.15
3.48
2.40
2.67
0.13
0.32
0.28
2.41
0.15
0.30
0.28
5.76
0.73
2.36
1.10
17.61
3.15
5.04
4.00
0.88
0.05
0.04
0.09
2.67
0.23
0.25
0.36
2.44
0.09
0.38
0.23
2.33
0.05
0.22
0.18
17.11
2.21
7.54
3.35
CO (g/m)
SMT
119.84
75.01
109.94
79.72
35.33
15.05
23.70
16.70
9.53
3.11
4.49
3.54
13.67
10.35
4.26
10.10
48.47
9.46
16.20
11.93
141.60
42.77
88.90
50.87
6.53
3.52
3.01
3.64
20.28
8.73
6.51
9.17
36.45
8.82
7.30
10.17
16.73
0.97
3.72
1.96
62.68
59.65
43.42
58.69
BKI
102.83
64.36
103.79
69.04
29.58
13.11
19.62
14.42
12.50
3.87
4.21
4.34
12.74
7.55
3.32
7.53
39.34
8.04
14.13
10.07
115.18
38.38
75.21
44.74
7.75
3.50
2.59
3.66
19.09
8.16
4.95
8.50
36.88
5.91
6.16
7.55
16.33
0.95
3.03
1.88
55.07
30.19
34.88
31.80
NOx (g/m)
SMT
8.70
5.35
5.94
5.56
7.43
6.97
7.82
7.05
1.97
0.26
0.32
0.35
4.04
0.75
1.21
0.95
3.26
3.10
3.18
3.11
3.09
3.23
4.88
3.34
0.24
0.06
0.11
0.07
1.78
0.81
0.73
0.86
2.63
1.06
1.19
1.15
1.37
0.36
0.44
0.42
4.35
2.52
3.72
2.70
BKI
8.24
4.73
5.34
4.96
6.95
6.03
7.20
6.16
2.26
0.25
0.26
0.36
3.77
0.57
0.97
0.76
2.81
2.51
2.77
2.55
2.71
2.44
3.68
2.54
0.35
0.06
0.10
0.08
2.34
0.76
1.06
0.86
1.48
0.32
0.45
0.39
4.17
1.39
3.21
1.66
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
835.49
484.38
656.18
514.29
677.75
411.65
586.50
437.55
352.67
209.42
376.37
228.46
720.64
402.94
593.72
432.66
747.61
448.38
621 .65
475.82
862.29
530.01
767.70
562.93
372.42
239.83
401.51
257.72
700.39
374.92
645.36
410.81
1243.05
872.42
995.82
900.28
754.34
425.99
631.31
456.95
872.61
825.85
738.13
822.24
BKI
758.39
428.56
581.92
456.03
639.47
380.71
533.41
404.72
405.31
271.19
352.31
283.81
666.03
389.18
511.81
411.99
569.08
390.55
513.87
408.26
747.36
471.13
668.67
498.48
429.11
262.57
336.58
276.26
611.41
366.09
494.39
387.82
1114.30
656.36
869.06
694.88
740.48
431.93
603.95
459.54
721.46
440.80
612.17
467.13
PM2.5
(mg/m)
51.78
181.78
15.34
163.71
8.01
4.01
36.51
6.47
7.31
5.40
4.23
5.42
61.79
9.14
1.62
11.35
9.20
6.51
1745.37
127.11
461.01
36.48
40.62
57.90
6.83
2.95
1.23
3.03
3.71
1.74
-0.02
1.72
4.59
30.19
2.01
26.93
6.59
0.88
2.31
1.27
12.74
9.88
5.16
9.71
Distance
(miles)
1.17
8.63
1.18
10.98
1.18
8.62
1.20
10.99
1.21
8.69
1.20
11.09
1.18
8.61
1.18
10.98
1.17
8.64
1.20
11.01
1.14
8.69
1.19
11.02
1.19
8.65
1.17
11.01
1.17
8.52
1.19
10.89
1.20
8.63
1.18
11.00
1.17
8.63
1.18
10.98
1.19
8.70
1.19
11.08
24
-------
RunID
84302
84302
84302
84302
84303
84303
84303
84303
84304
84304
84304
84304
84305
84305
84305
84305
84307
84307
84307
84307
84308
84308
84308
84308
84309
84309
84309
84309
84310
84310
84310
84310
84311
84311
84311
84311
84312
84312
84312
84312
84314
84314
84314
84314
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
2.83
0.30
1.21
0.50
0.94
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.51
0.01
0.01
0.04
1.82
0.02
0.10
0.12
2.10
0.09
0.12
0.20
2.19
0.12
0.38
0.25
26.00
11.10
12.34
11.96
0.98
0.04
0.08
0.09
2.99
0.21
0.23
0.36
1.68
0.11
0.38
0.21
4.37
0.54
1.21
0.79
BKI
3.16
0.31
1.40
0.53
1.12
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.74
0.01
0.01
0.05
1.99
0.02
0.10
0.13
2.44
0.09
0.12
0.22
2.52
0.12
0.39
0.27
21.81
8.32
10.99
9.21
1.03
0.02
0.07
0.07
3.42
0.23
0.24
0.39
1.93
0.10
0.40
0.22
4.15
0.47
0.88
0.69
CO (g/m)
SMT
29.50
4.95
13.20
6.81
8.04
0.49
0.41
0.88
3.27
1.08
0.74
1.17
24.12
0.41
1.48
1.72
20.61
2.86
3.42
3.81
20.08
7.51
10.76
8.39
561.82
214.80
242.08
234.68
12.34
0.41
0.61
1.05
49.55
9.45
4.07
11.17
18.87
7.03
11.48
7.96
56.55
21.46
30.99
23.95
BKI
29.18
4.23
12.79
6.14
9.05
0.30
0.22
0.75
3.72
0.97
0.40
1.07
25.45
0.34
1.19
1.70
19.89
2.72
2.76
3.60
20.29
7.20
9.57
8.04
442.72
155.37
196.63
173.08
11.35
0.22
0.49
0.82
50.02
9.77
3.75
11.45
19.24
6.87
10.35
7.76
45.70
17.17
19.39
18.81
NOx (g/m)
SMT
3.05
2.10
2.17
2.16
1.62
0.25
0.27
0.32
0.61
0.12
0.22
0.15
2.42
0.48
0.38
0.58
3.76
0.40
0.87
0.60
4.18
2.21
2.32
2.32
1.41
2.51
2.31
2.44
1.17
0.25
0.21
0.30
2.55
1.03
1.28
1.13
3.92
2.20
2.63
2.32
4.22
2.82
2.65
2.88
BKI
3.04
1.81
2.11
1.90
1.64
0.16
0.24
0.25
0.84
0.10
0.19
0.15
2.40
0.42
0.38
0.52
3.80
0.40
0.74
0.60
4.07
1.91
2.08
2.04
1.61
2.17
2.20
2.14
1.11
0.17
0.17
0.22
2.89
1.02
1.24
1.13
3.76
1.88
2.16
2.00
3.78
2.31
2.21
2.38
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
851.06
547.73
693.69
573.72
784.78
567.73
609.59
581.99
519.16
284.98
494.55
311.60
660.45
375.56
565.05
403.45
633.22
355.73
574.48
385.04
659.07
378.97
554.52
405.69
984.45
671.10
719.75
690.72
852.70
622.50
647.53
636.26
448.13
255.31
428.94
277.29
640.53
374.23
576.32
402.17
616.98
355.99
590.57
385.99
BKI
837.37
507.43
659.69
535.35
798.50
489.65
639.17
516.09
509.48
312.94
387.60
328.26
662.09
385.42
530.70
409.78
612.02
371.59
501.98
392.86
648.44
387.23
511.68
409.38
769.78
478.69
603.34
502.38
821 .22
503.75
650.77
530.59
479.10
316.91
402.02
331.19
633.92
381.34
523.90
404.40
534.70
343.10
452.79
360.73
PM2.5
(mg/m)
7.12
7.07
6.63
7.04
3.01
2.42
3.01
2.49
2.94
2.18
0.67
2.12
1.77
1.27
0.78
1.27
6.63
1.39
1.48
1.67
6.90
3.96
1.84
3.96
134.20
40.23
16.98
43.46
13.31
5.87
1.11
5.92
26.82
8.64
2.04
9.14
1.32
0.86
2.58
1.00
11.49
3.46
1.19
3.72
Distance
(miles)
1.21
8.70
1.21
11.12
1.19
8.67
1.20
11.06
1.19
8.67
1.19
11.05
1.19
8.69
1.19
11.07
1.16
8.62
1.19
10.97
1.17
8.62
1.21
11.00
1.18
8.66
1.20
11.04
1.20
8.67
1.21
11.08
1.19
8.64
1.18
11.01
1.19
8.62
1.19
11.01
1.19
8.60
1.20
10.99
25
-------
RunID
84315
84315
84315
84315
84316
84316
84316
84316
84318
84318
84318
84318
84319
84319
84319
84319
84321
84321
84321
84321
84322
84322
84322
84322
84324
84324
84324
84324
84325
84325
84325
84325
84327
84327
84327
84327
84328
84328
84328
84328
84329
84329
84329
84329
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
5.53
0.53
1.85
0.88
4.58
0.58
1.19
0.83
1.42
0.14
0.22
0.21
2.14
0.08
0.38
0.21
2.53
0.06
0.15
0.19
2.14
0.20
0.27
0.30
2.48
0.12
0.27
0.25
3.31
0.21
0.34
0.38
1.59
0.04
0.13
0.12
2.81
0.06
0.17
0.21
2.29
0.11
0.20
0.23
BKI
5.93
0.62
2.02
0.99
5.02
0.59
1.15
0.86
2.10
0.18
0.27
0.28
2.22
0.08
0.36
0.21
2.74
0.05
0.16
0.20
2.26
0.18
0.26
0.30
2.51
0.11
0.29
0.25
4.24
0.18
0.42
0.41
1.65
0.03
0.15
0.12
2.92
0.05
0.19
0.21
2.32
0.08
0.20
0.20
CO (g/m)
SMT
22.57
5.49
16.70
7.13
24.36
8.21
8.12
9.04
7.52
2.59
4.13
2.95
15.31
2.09
5.40
2.99
15.16
0.34
0.84
1.14
18.44
8.16
7.75
8.67
23.49
4.70
3.21
5.57
6.55
1.75
3.46
2.12
12.58
1.61
1.39
2.17
15.16
0.34
0.84
1.14
19.95
2.70
1.22
3.49
BKI
19.73
5.34
14.49
6.70
21.46
7.22
6.43
7.90
9.19
3.47
4.31
3.83
13.32
1.85
3.97
2.58
13.81
0.25
0.51
0.97
16.08
7.02
6.40
7.44
22.08
4.02
2.71
4.86
6.66
1.78
3.33
2.14
12.83
1.26
1.14
1.85
14.08
0.22
0.36
0.94
18.23
1.39
0.51
2.19
NOx (g/m)
SMT
4.59
1.96
3.70
2.21
3.26
0.74
1.37
0.92
1.89
0.89
1.04
0.96
3.43
0.47
1.14
0.66
4.12
0.29
0.48
0.50
2.43
1.40
2.07
1.50
2.52
0.33
0.66
0.46
2.43
0.30
0.49
0.42
1.55
0.21
0.56
0.31
4.37
0.44
0.95
0.68
2.09
0.30
0.97
0.44
BKI
4.15
1.71
3.22
1.93
2.87
0.62
1.01
0.76
2.28
1.01
1.05
1.08
3.47
0.44
0.94
0.62
4.09
0.26
0.53
0.48
2.21
1.19
1.75
1.28
2.51
0.34
0.62
0.47
2.67
0.27
0.53
0.41
1.50
0.17
0.47
0.26
4.10
0.25
0.55
0.47
1.86
0.14
0.72
0.27
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
604.79
330.68
516.00
357.28
587.59
340.56
543.90
367.52
414.14
245.28
390.71
264.34
680.09
365.81
604.62
398.40
754.62
401.93
601.76
433.83
532.31
346.28
484.08
365.19
705.06
372.09
603.50
405.25
601.86
377.28
481 .26
396.19
760.85
413.89
604.59
445.01
767.11
397.17
586.04
429.30
833.24
685.50
710.83
694.82
BKI
555.30
350.33
476.53
369.35
534.01
328.44
448.47
347.47
494.57
323.60
419.10
339.20
621.45
367.45
475.46
387.87
740.64
402.30
560.62
430.66
469.70
298.07
387.04
313.03
652.23
381.81
499.23
403.80
644.62
380.26
524.24
404.01
747.09
412.13
585.98
441.46
750.80
396.20
549.71
425.13
764.60
479.97
639.13
505.63
PM2.5
(mg/m)
105.79
56.11
86.61
60.71
52.72
51.09
27.97
49.57
6.64
3.48
1.77
3.53
12.30
3.92
0.31
4.10
3.06
1.39
0.40
1.41
7.78
10.49
4.70
9.96
7.69
3.01
0.73
3.10
14.00
2.49
2.13
3.06
2.39
0.49
0.29
0.57
2.59
0.38
-0.47
0.44
-1.21
12.06
2.07
10.69
Distance
(miles)
1.14
8.58
1.17
10.90
1.18
8.58
1.19
10.95
1.20
8.63
1.20
11.03
1.16
8.63
1.19
10.99
1.18
8.66
1.18
11.02
1.20
8.76
1.19
11.15
1.17
8.63
1.18
10.99
1.20
8.64
1.18
11.02
1.19
8.63
1.18
11.00
1.18
8.62
1.19
10.99
1.17
8.65
1.20
11.02
26
-------
RunID
84355
84355
84355
84355
84356
84356
84356
84356
84357
84357
84357
84357
84359
84359
84359
84359
84360
84360
84360
84360
Phase
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
1
2
3
A
HC (g/m)
SMT
0.65
0.02
0.03
0.05
1.91
0.06
0.17
0.17
1.76
0.72
3.35
0.96
2.59
0.09
0.38
0.24
5.36
2.17
3.68
2.44
BKI
0.94
0.02
0.04
0.07
2.27
0.06
0.17
0.19
1.76
0.67
5.38
1.06
1.78
0.10
0.29
0.20
5.44
2.05
3.52
2.33
CO (g/m)
SMT
7.25
0.54
0.76
0.92
21.33
3.80
5.48
4.85
20.91
44.99
15.37
41.62
22.57
2.58
4.03
3.75
32.75
14.00
23.58
15.65
BKI
10.70
0.49
0.74
1.05
24.56
3.90
5.17
5.07
20.24
47.99
13.80
44.14
15.36
2.48
1.94
3.13
31.28
12.91
20.96
14.43
NOx (g/m)
SMT
1.71
0.16
0.17
0.25
4.15
1.15
1.63
1.34
2.09
0.39
1.40
0.55
2.31
0.96
2.07
1.11
5.75
4.64
5.97
4.79
BKI
1.90
0.14
0.16
0.23
4.36
1.16
1.60
1.36
2.09
0.41
1.38
0.56
2.29
0.97
1.85
1.10
7.86
6.24
7.98
6.45
CO2 (g/m)
SMT
628.39
392.33
533.20
414.86
641 .45
326.86
501.60
355.85
536.58
278.80
416.54
302.17
760.69
389.94
580.64
422.94
683.84
398.71
592.59
427.20
BKI
731.92
425.20
550.15
450.20
686.57
341.59
490.41
370.06
504.72
284.72
379.05
302.85
507.45
322.90
395.92
337.80
658.38
381.41
538.64
406.81
PM2.5
(mg/m)
2.21
1.00
1.48
1.10
7.63
3.85
0.86
3.84
5.97
8.28
5.39
7.96
5.13
5.69
-0.30
5.24
6.38
0.63
1.42
0.98
Distance
(miles)
1.23
8.75
1.22
11.21
1.22
8.76
1.21
11.19
1.20
8.69
1.22
11.12
1.24
8.79
1.23
11.26
1.20
8.74
1.22
11.17
27
-------
Plots of Dynamometer Measurements vs. SEMTECH Measurements
In the following plots of emissions by test phase, the symbols and colors used vary. Phase 1 emissions are depicted
in red, phase 2 emissions in green, and phase 3 emissions in brown. HC, CO, NOx, and CO2 are depicted using
dots, squares, triangles, and circle-crosses, respectively. Note that the 1:1 line depicted is for reference purposes; it
is not a regression line.
25
Scatter Plot of Phase) HC fa/hile)
5 10 15
SEMTECH HC(g/mle)
/proJ1/Kansasdty/AnalyBla/Roiixt1/SLmBKl_SEM^a8 25JUL06 1519
20
25
Sealer Rot ot Phase! CO (gMte)
300
8
I
ISO
100 160 200 250 !
SEMTECH CO (a/Trite)
/pioJI/lfensasClly/Aialysls/Floundl/SumBKI.SEMjas 25JUL06 15.19
28
-------
Scatter Plot of Phassl NQx (g/hife)
10
9
1600:
1400:
1300:
1200:
tlOO:
1000:
900:
800:
TOO:
600:
600:
400:
300:
200:
100:
0:
234567
SEMTECH NQx (g/mle)
/^JI/KaneasC^/Analyrt/Roundl/SumBKlJSEMjas 25JUL06 1519
Scatter Plot of Phase! CQ2 (s/rrfc)
100200300400600600700800900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1600
SEMTECH CQ2 (g/mfe)
/piDjI/KanBaaCtty/Analyala/Roinll/SumBKI.SEMjas 25JUL06 1519
29
-------
20
Scatter Plot of PhaseZ HC (g/Me)
5 10 15
SEMIECH HC fertile)
/^JI/KaneasC^/Analyrt/Roundl/SumBKlJSEMjas 25JUL06 1R19
Scalier Plot of Phases CO (g/Me)
25
100 150 200 250
SEMTECH CO (g/Me)
/praJI/KanBaaC«y/Mialy8lB/Roinl1/SumBKI_SEM«a8 25JUL06 1M9
300 350
30
-------
Scatter Plot of Phase2 NQx (g/Mte)
10
9
8
7
6
1600:
1400:
1300:
1200:
tlOO:
1000:
900:
800:
TOO:
600:
500:
400:
300:
200:
100:
0:
234567
SEMTECH NQx (g/mle)
/^JI/KaneasC^/Analyrt/Roundl/SumBKlJSEMjas 25JUL06 1519
Scam Plot of Phase2 CO2 (gAnle)
9 10
100200300400600600700800900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
SEMTECH CQ2 (g/mfe)
/piDjI/KafiBaaCtty/Mialyala/Roinll/SumBKI.SEMjas 25JUL06 1M9
-------
Scatter Plot of Phases HC (g/Me)
5 10 15
SEMIECH HC fertile)
/^JI/KaneasC^/Analyrt/Roundl/SumBKlJSEMjas 25JUL06 1R19
Scatter Plot of Phases CO (g/rr*>)
20
25
60 100 150 200 250 300
SEMTECH CO fa/Trite)
/proJI/Kaneaaray/AialyslB/Floiiiol/SumBKl.saijas 25JUL06 1M9
32
-------
Scatter Plot of Phases NQx (g/Mte)
10
9
8
7
6
1600:
1400:
1300:
1200:
tlOO:
1000:
900:
800:
TOO:
600:
500:
400:
300:
200:
100:
0:
234567
SEMTECH NQx (g/mle)
/^JI/KaneasC^/Analyrt/Roundl/SumBKlJSEMjas 25JUL06 1519
Scatter Plot of Phases CO2 (gAnle)
100200300400600600700800900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
SEMTECH CQ2 (g/mfe)
/praJI/KanBaaC«y/Mialy8lB/Roinl1/SumBI
-------
Plots of Dynamometer Measurements and PM2.s Measured by Gravimetric
Mass-DRI
10
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
Bto-ne ism ECer-ieei-ieeo
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
34
-------
£
S
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
35
-------
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
8
3
isei aiuok-ttei-iago onuk-m-icn niuck-MBe-ffeiw E&r-Pn ttei
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
8
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
36
-------
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
si-teeo cihifc-nei-nss aBufc-ieee-Nnwr
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
37
-------
3
Bag 1- Cold Start (Log Scale)
DJUCk-WBB-ffeiW ECar-PIB 1981 RBy-fiBI-1
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 1- Cold Start (Linear Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
38
-------
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
A.HM*-Pn Wl BfflUk-ISBI-IESD
Glu*-199l-iasB
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
4 I.
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
39
-------
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
«.-
11000
1"
£
i"
o ai™
3
QDIO -
CLOOI -
1
•
•
•
i
i : i • |
i
! . 1
•
J
A.lU*-Pn Wl BfflUk-ISBI-IBSD ClU*-1991-19SO DJU*-199B-NHHEr EJOO-PK 1981 RDV-1BBI-19BG
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
,
i i
I
i
•
aa*-«»i-i993 Hto-we
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
ID -
a
as -
M
I: :
a -j
„: •
•
6 -
: •
4- •
1
• 1
! 1 1 ' 1
•
1
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
*.ihi*-Pre ten aituk-nei-ieeo c.iu*-i9ei-«SB aiuk-ieee-Neiwer ECW-PIB wa FCw-rea-weo acer-nn-iees HOw-nee-ftaKr
40
-------
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
8
3
A.1uk-Rn1B8t anuk-lan-lsso aiuk-199l-1ssB DJuk-WSG-Nam
8
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
aar-lmi-lssB w^-fiBe-ftaer
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
41
-------
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
IBBI Eto-«ei-i990 Qjto-l9ei-iB9B Ha*-fiB6-M»er
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
42
-------
3
Bag 2- Transient (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
43
-------
Bag 2- Transient (Linear Scale)
IBM aiuok-ttei-iago onuk-m-icn niuck-MBe-ffeiw E&r-Pn ttei
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
44
-------
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
MlUk-na 1B8I &Huk-1BBI-1990 ClUk-ISBI-IBSB QJUk-IBBH-lfeMW EOtf-F*
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
IE
&
3
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
45
-------
8
3
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
I i
aiuk-lsse-Mm BCar-Po no RCa-lsa-iooo ac»-19EN-
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
46
-------
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
8
S
ClUk-ISBI-IBSB QJUk-IBBH-lfeMW EO»-RTB 1WI FC*-19B1-1BQO
Vehicle Qass and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
47
-------
£
a '
Bag 3- Warm Start (Linear Scale)
l-ttse aiuek-1996-ltaw ECBT-PW net
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
Bag 3- Warm Start (Log Scale)
Vehicle Class and Model Year Bin
48
-------
Scatter Plots of Dynamometer Measurements vs. PM2.s Measured by
Gravimetric Mass-DRI
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO2 (Linear Scale)- TRUCK
CO2 Emission (g/mile)
ilUOk-19BI-1BBO A A A C.T1U*-*W-1BS6
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs ComposHe HC (Log Scale)- CAR
3
Log HC Emission (g/mile)
* D D D
49
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite HC (Linear Scale)- CAR
HC Emission (g/mile)
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite HC (Log Scale)- TRUCK
Log HC Emission (g/mile)
.nuok-l9Bi-ls9o A A A C.Tlu*-*w-iB96
50
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite HC (Linear Scale)- TRUCK
HC Emission (g/mile)
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO (Log Scale)- CAR
3
Log CO Emission (g/mile)
51
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO (Linear Scale)- CAR
CO Emission (g/mile)
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO (Log Scale)- TRUCK
3
Log CO Emission (g/mile)
52
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO (Linear Scale)- TRUCK
CO Emission (g/rnile)
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO2 (Log Scale)- CAR
3
Log CO2 Emission (g/mile)
53
-------
Scatter Plot of Composite PM2.5 vs Composite CO2 (Log Scale)- TRUCK
Log CO2 Emission (g/mile)
O O B.THJ
54
-------
Plots of Dynamometer Measurements as a Function of Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
W8 W» ttSO 1991 19aiBB31B9419eB1B9B1B971B9B1BBBSOOOaiDIXnBSOaSBa04an6i
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
a
3
EGO «91 «B2 «G8 IBM ttBS 1966 1BB7 C96 KM 9000 2301 9001 9009 9004 !
Model Year
55
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
a •
1978 1979 080 1981 1982 1988 19B4 1986 19B8 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 SDK 2009 2004 2008 i
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
a
3
BOO «91 «B2 «G8 IBM ttBS 1966 1BB7 «98 KM 9000 2001 9001 9009 9004 !
Model Year
56
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
a.
19T9 BBC 1SB1 1982 1BB3 1BB4 1SBB 19B8 1BB7 1988 1389 1990 1991 1998 19S3 1994 1996 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 KOI 2002 2DQ8 2004 2006 2006
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
8
EGO «91 «B2 «G8 IBM ttBS 1966 1E87 C96 KM 9000 2301 9001 9009 9004 !
Model Year
57
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
8
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
8
EGO «91 «B2 «G8 IBM ttBS 1966 1BB7 C96 KM 9000 9D01 9001 9009 9004 !
Model Year
58
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
tr n
WBB ttf» 1990 1991 m 1993 1994
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
s
1
«B8 19B4 1986 «BB 1B87 «8B «B6 I960 1961 199 1968 1964 W65 1966 1997 1966 1969 2000 :
Model Year
59
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
s
nee wee «w wee wee nso isei ie« wes «« wee wee «er lees leee axn am axe 2009 2004 :
Model Year
60
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -TRUCK
Model Year
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- CAR
s
Model Year
i 2000 2001 aOOl 2009 9004 200G !
61
-------
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Linear Scale) -CAR
fifK 1937 W8 ttf» 1990 1991 199199319941Se6199B199rig9B19992000aniaia20a3ao04ax6
Composite Emission Values as a Function of Model Year (Log Scale)- TRUCK
S
Model Year
i 2000 2001 aOOl 2009 9004 2006 !
62
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix I
Install Guidelines
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
Important Operation Notes:
Whenever updating SEMTECH firmware, individual bench firmware must be manually
updated after the main flash card firmware is updated (i.e., the NDIV AMBII bench
firmware must be manually updated through the Tech Support/Maintenance/Firmware
update menu). This is not prompted, and not automatic.
Never insert or remove a memory card when the SEMTECH is powered up.
Never interchange memory cards between SEMTECH units without first reformatting the card.
Always back up all data on a memory card before reformatting the card.
When a memory card is first used in a SEMTECH, it must either be new or be reformatted.
To reformat a card, use a PCMCIA flashcard adaptor in a laptop's port. Open "my computer",
and select the drive that represents the flash card. Then, in the file menu, select "format".
Format as "FAT16", NOT "FAT32" ("FAT32" will probably be the default, and "FAT16" will
probably just be listed as "FAT").
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
Task
Connect power
to SEMTECH
Turn
SEMTECH on
Connect host
computer
Check FID
pressure
regulator
Open FID fuel
supply
Verify FID fuel
pressure
Description
Connect power cable to SEMTECH.
Press the front panel main power switch (to begin the 1-hour warm-up
process).
Home /N/ A
If not already logged on, initialize SENSOR Tech PC software on host
computer. Establish communications between host computer and
SEMTECH unit with Ethernet cable or wireless connection.
FID pressure regulator should read 30 PSIG. ENSURE the right
nylon washer is used (not the seal cap that comes with the refilled FID
bottles).
N/A/N/A
Open the FID cover on the back of the SEMTECH and open main FID
gas bottle valve.
Status / Summary
Verify FID fuel pressure shown on summary screen is greater than
100 psig, and record FID fuel pressure on data collection sheet.
Replace bottle if necessary (usage rate is 200 psig/hour) using
guidelines in Section 7.6. If bottle replacement is necessary, ensure
output pressure as shown on FID regulator is 30 psig. Note: FID
output pressure is critical as it affects HC reading.
December 30, 2004
Pagel of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
7
8
9
10
11
FID leak check
Record system
data
Verify system
pressures (FID
off)
Status / Summary
Perform FID leak check by closing main FID bottle valve and
measuring pressure drop. The displayed pressure should not drop by
more than 1% in 30 seconds. If unit passes leak check, reopen main
bottle valve, then close FID cover on back of unit. Otherwise, repair
system and recheck.
Status / Summary
Record the independently measured ambient temperature and relative
humidity on the data collection sheet. Note that these measurements
should be taken at the front of the vehicle (air introduced to engine).
9.1
Status /Flow
SEMTECH system pressures are provided on the unit's "Flow"
screen. Check to see no cap is on the ambient port at the back of the
SEMTECH, and ensure that the various ports are open and able to
flow. Quick disconnects should be depressed to allow a free flow of
gasses on each port tested. Ensure SEMTECH system pressures at
points shown as P1, P2, and P3 on SEMTECH flow diagram are
within acceptable ranges for the various input flows (ambient, sample,
span, and zero) and record values on the data collection sheet.
Toggle between "ambient", "sample", "span", and "zero" inputs using
the sample input button on the lower right of the flow screen. The
"Allowable AP (mbar)" column in each table indicates the maximum
allowable pressure drop (below ambient pressure) for each system
location (disregard pressures for the shaded cells). If pressures drop
below these limits, service unit as outlined in Section 12 of the
SEMTECH user's manual.
Ambient Port Sample Port Zero Port Span Port
Flo Po'nt Allowable Allowable Allowable Allowable
Pressure Drop Pressure Drop Pressure Drop Pressure Drop
P1 -200 -300 ^^^H^^^^^^^^^^^^^l
P2 -250 -250 -250 -250
P3 -250 -250 -250 -250
Perform a leak
check
Verify analyzer
sample rates
System Setup / Leak Test
Using the supplied soft plastic cap (or other appropriate device), seal
the end of the %" sample port line to perform a leak check. On the
host computer, select the "Start" button to initiate the leak test. The
system will automatically perform the leak test and display the results.
If the unit fails the leak check, repair as necessary. Once the unit has
successfully completed the leak test, connect the %" sample port line
to the exhaust flow port.
System Setup / Configure 1
Ensure the system's sample rates are set to the appropriate values
(system control = 1000 ms, FID = 500 ms, NDIR=1200, NDUV = 500
ms.
December 30, 2004
Page 2 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Ignite FID
Install
SEMTECH in
vehicle
Install FID
exhaust and
drain tubes
Install GPS
receiver
Install weather
probe
Install vehicle
interface cable
Install exhaust
flow meter
tube and flow
meter
Connect
Power Supply
Install trunk
latch
System Setup / Configure 1
Check the FID temperature using the Status/Summary screen. If the
FID oven is 170 deg C or hotter, the FID may be ignited (ignition may
be performed at lower temperatures, but fuel is then wasted during
warm-up). To ignite the FID, select the flame "on" button.
Approximately 15 minutes are required for the FID to come to
equilibrium after the flame is ignited.
Move SEMTECH to vehicle. Ensure all necessary connections, lines,
wires, etc. are installed and routed securely. Secure SEMTECH and
battery in trunk.
Attach the flexible tubing to the FID exhaust port and the ambient air
port on the back of the unit. Route the tubing out of the trunk, and
away from the vehicle's exhaust.
Install magnetic GPS unit to top of vehicle, and connect GPS wiring to
front of SEMTECH.
Install the weather probe on roof or back window of vehicle using
provided suction-cup. Connect wiring to front of the SEMTECH.
Connect the SEMTECH to the vehicle's OBDII diagnostic link
connector (DLC) with the supplied cable (running the cable past the
back seat). The DLC is typically located under the vehicle's
instrument panel, within arm's reach of the steering wheel.
Install external exhaust tube to bumper of vehicle and connect to
tailpipe with appropriate adaptors and hardware. Note that the two
flow meter connectors should be near the tube's outlet, and the
sample port should be closer to the vehicle exhaust system than the
flow meter connectors. Connect the flow meter to the SEMTECH with
the two electrical lines. Connect the %" sample port line to the
exhaust tube port. Note: Use 2" pitot tube flowmeters for engines <
3L, and 2.5" pitot tube flowmeters for engines > 3L. Ensure diameter
of all tubing leading to flowmeter is equivalent to or great than
diameter of the flowmeter.
Connect power supply to battery, then plug charger in. Power supply
should be used during warm-up and calibration.
Install the extended trunk latch to prevent trunk from closing on
cables.
December 30, 2004
Page3 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
21
Establish
vehicle
interface (VI)
communication
System Setup / Configure 1
On 1996 and newer vehicles, select the appropriate SEMTECH
connector port (VI). Select the "Edit PIDs" button at the bottom of the
screen, and verify the "LD OBDN" option is highlighted. Once LD
OBDII is selected, use "set group" to save the LD PIDs. Then,
determine the appropriate OBDII communication protocol for the
vehicle, using handheld scanner info or guidelines in Part B of this
document. To select the protocol, use the "Protocol" button's drop-
down menu. After the protocol is selected, start the vehicle to ensure
communication is established (as evidenced by a live data stream
display shown on the "Vehicle Interface" screen.) If communication is
not established, try another possible protocol. Several attempts may
be necessary. Indicate which protocol is used (or indicate if the
vehicle will not communicate) below. If communication isn't
established, it may be necessary to pull the DLC connector off the
vehicle for at least 10 seconds to allow the system to reset (probably
after each time a new protocol is attempted). Also, if the SEMTECH
is switched from AUX2 to VI or from VI to AUX2, the SEMTECH must
be shut down and restarted to reset.
22
Set auxiliary
inputs / outputs
System Setup / Configure 2
Set conditions for auxiliary inputs and outputs in the Configure 2
screen. At a minimum, this involves turning the GPS receiver on, and
setting the units desired for CO measurement display. Input and/or
output triggers may also be set in this screen, as well as ranges for
analog outputs.
23
Review
collected
parameters
Test / Road Test
Switch the SEMTECH to the "Road Test" menu and review the
display screen to ensure all desired information is available for
recording.
24
Check for
system faults
and warnings
Status / Faults
Use the "System Information Bar" at the bottom of the SEMTECH
screen to determine if system faults or warnings are present. If any
faults or warnings are present, review and correct the faults and
warnings listed in the "faults" display screen.
25
Verify battery
voltage
Status / Summary
Temporarily remove power supply from battery and verify the battery
voltage is sufficient for the testing to be performed (voltage should be
over 13 volts). Record battery voltage in the space above. Replace
the battery with a charged unit, if necessary. Immediately after
checking voltage, replace power supply to avoid draining the battery
during FID warm-up.
December 30, 2004
Page 4 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
26
Set transport
delays and
other test
parameters
Test / Test Setup
Under the "Settings" tab, use the "Edit Test Configuration" button to
set the NDIR, NDUV, SCB, FID, methane FID, and EFM transport
delays to 6, 6, 0, 5, 5, and 0, respectively (for the pitot tube
flowmeter). Set all pollutant detection limits to zero, and set the
"Calculation Control" parameters to the appropriate configuration
(mass emission calc from flow meter, vehicle speed from GPS, and
engine speed from ECM). Set calculation limits for engine speed at
1000 RPM/s, vehicle speed at 21.0 mph/s, fuel rate at 0.050 gal/s,
and fuel specific dropout at 0.50 %C. Don't enter independent
weather station data, unless the SEMTECH's weather station probe
isn't used for some reason. Set the fuel H/C ratio at 1.8, and the fuel
specific gravity at 0.744. For the NMHC cutter for the methane FID,
enter the CH4 (propane) cut as 1.0 and the C2H6 (ethane) as 0.015.
Then, select the "open marker window", and move this marker
window to the upper right-hand of the screen for future use in setting
markers in the recorded data file.
27
Configure
analog inputs
Test / Test Setup
Still within the "Edit Test Configuration" window, select the "Analog
Inputs" tab and configure all analog input data as appropriate.
29
Enter test
identification
info
Test / Test Setup
Still within the "Edit Test Configuration" window, select the "Test Info"
tab and enter test identification information. Use the "Scratch Pad" to
record any unique test conditions or situations and all appropriate test
details. Also record the flowmeter ID # in the scratch pad.
28
Establish post-
processing
output groups
Test / Test Setup
Still within the "Edit Test Configuration" window, select the "Outputs"
tab and ensure "select all" is select for output post-processing.
30
Save setup
Test / Test Setup
After all test setup parameters are selected, switch back to the
"Setup" tab, and click on the "Save" button. IMPORTANT: All test
settings will be lost unless the data is saved.
31
Verify warm-up
Status / Summary
Use the "System Information Bar" at the bottom of the SEMTECH
screen to determine if warm-up has been completed, and view details
in the "Status / Summary" screen. When the SEMTECH indicates
warm-up is complete, record the FID oven temperature and chiller
temperature on the data collection sheet.
32
Record zero,
audit and span
gas bottle
information
Record cylinder numbers for the zero, audit and span gasses on the
data collection sheet. Begin the session manager. Note that gas
concentrations that may be used for the various audits and spans are
provided in the "Calibration and Audit Gas Blend Ranges" section in
Part C of this document.
December 30, 2004
Page 5 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
33
Perform a zero
calibration
System Setup/Zero
Once the system is fully warmed up, and the FID has been burning
for at least 15 minutes, the system may be zeroed (ensure your
session is started). To prepare for a zero, hook the zero gas bottle to
the zero port on the front panel of the unit, open the zero air valve,
and adjust the pressure regulator to approximately 30 psig. Then, on
the SEMTECH display, select all gas channels (except CH4,
methane, which would be measured by the additional methane FID),
select the zero port, then click the zero button. Note the HC (ppmCS)
is ppm HC expressed as propane, measured by NDIR, and the THC
(PPM) is total hydrocarbon measured by the FID). After the zero
calibration is complete, close the zero bottle valve and disconnect the
zero air tube from the SEMTECH zero port. Note: do not zero on
ambient air, as this will result in decreased accuracy of CO2 readings.
34
Perform a gas
audit
System Setup /Audit
After the zero calibration has been completed, the gas audit may be
performed. To prepare for a gas audit, determine the proper gas
range (use high concentration range for 1995 and older vehicles, low
concentration range for 1996 and newer vehicles), hook the audit gas
bottle to the span port on the front panel of the unit, open the audit
gas bottle valve, and adjust the pressure regulator to approximately
30 psig. Then, on the SEMTECH display, select all gasses to be
audited (excluding O2 and CH4, the methane FID), enter the bottle
concentrations for each of the gasses, and select the appropriate type
of hydrocarbon gas (i.e., methane or propane). Note the HC (ppmCS)
is ppm HC expressed as propane, measured by NDIR, and the THC
(PPM) is total hydrocarbon measured by the FID). Select the "span"
port, and click the start button to initiate the audit. If unit fails the
audit, perform a span calibration (described below) and then re-audit.
After the gas audit is complete, close the audit bottle valve and
disconnect the audit gas tube from the SEMTECH span port.
35
Perform an O2
audit
System Setup /Audit
After the gas audit has been completed, perform an O2 audit. To
perform an O2 audit, select O2 on the SEMTECH unit, enter 20.9 % as
the O2 concentration, and select "ambient" as the port (if not
automatic). Begin the audit by selecting the start button. If unit fails
the O2 audit, perform a span calibration (described below) and then
re-audit.
December 30, 2004
Page 6 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
36
Perform a span
calibration
System Setup / Span
If the unit fails any part of the gas or O2 audit, a span calibration must
be performed to recalibrate the unit. To prepare for a span
calibration, determine the proper gas range (use high concentration
range for 1995 and older vehicles, low concentration range for 1996
and newer vehicles), hook the appropriate span gas bottle to the span
port on the front panel of the unit (see "Calibration and Audit Gas
Blend Ranges" section at the end of this checklist to determine the
appropriate span gas), open the span gas bottle valve, and adjust the
pressure regulator to approximately 30 psig. Select the appropriate
THC FID range for the span calibration (under the "Settings/Configure
1" menu). Then, on the SEMTECH display, select all gasses to be
spanned (excluding O2 and CH4, the methane FID), enter the bottle
concentrations for each of the gasses, select the appropriate type of
hydrocarbon gas (i.e., methane or propane), and select the
appropriate span range (guidelines are listed in Part C of this
document). Note the HC (ppmCS) is ppm HC expressed as propane,
measured by NDIR, and the THC (PPM) is total hydrocarbon
measured by the FID). Select the "span" port, and click the start
button to initiate the span calibration. If unit fails the calibration,
perform necessary repairs, re-zero, and then perform another span
calibration. After the span calibration is complete, close the span
calibration bottle valve and disconnect the span gas tube from the
SEMTECH span port.
37
Perform an O2
calibration
System Setup I Span
After the span calibration has been completed, perform an O2
calibration. To perform an O2 calibration, select O2 on the SEMTECH
unit, enter 20.9 % as the O2 concentration, and select "ambient" as
the port (if not automatic). Click the start button to begin the
calibration. If unit fails the O2 calibration, perform necessary repairs,
re-zero, and then perform another O2 calibration. After the span and
O2 calibrations are complete, perform gas and O2 follow-up audits.
38
Perform a gas
re-audit
System Setup /Audit
This post-calibration audit only needs to be performed if unit fails
original audit and a span calibration is performed. Use "gas audit"
procedures outlined above.
39
Perform an O2
re-audit
System Setup /Audit
This post-calibration audit only needs to be performed if unit fails
original audit and an O2 calibration is performed. Use "O2 audit"
procedures outlined above.
40
Prepare
vehicle for
testing
Remove the power supply, extension cord, and any other connections
external to the vehicle. Walk around and inspect the vehicle to make
sure nothing is being overlooked. Verify suction cups and external
exhaust pipe are still secure. Latch the trunk with the latch
extension.
41
Switch input
from ambient
to exhaust
sample
Test / Test Setup
Prior to starting the test, change the source input from "Ambient Air"
to "Sample", using the input source selection button displayed at the
lower right corner of the screen.
December 30, 2004
Page 7 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part A: Task Instructions
42
Begin
recording test
record
Test / Test Setup
Begin recording data by clicking the "Start" button on the Test Setup
screen.
43
Set proper HC
range
Immediately before testing, start the vehicle, note the HC reading (in
the road test screen), and write the HC reading (PPM) on the first
page of the vehicle information packet (to help dyne SEMTECH folks
set it properly). Then, select the appropriate THC FID range for the
vehicle (under the "Settings/Configure 1" menu). Nearly all vehicles
will have HC readings over 1000 PPM (some only at cold-start), so
generally the range is either going to be set at 10,000 or 40,000
(some vehicles ARE over 10,000). NOTE: range setting can be
changed AFTER the session is started, and even after a test is
started. Please watch the road test screen during testing. If readings
max out in the road test screen, switch to the next higher range.
44
Conduct
testing
Conduct drive (or dyne) testing as required. Watch the CO and CO2
readings in the road test screen during testing. If the sum of the CO
and CO2 readings is less than 13, generally excessive dilution is
occurring (hybrids may be exception). Also check road test screen
for GPS, VI, exhaust flow, exhaust flow temp, weather station, aux
temp, and HC range. Using the emissions screen, evaluate
cumulative MPG values after a short drive.
45
Set post-test
time-alignment
stamp
After all testing has been completed, but before stopping data
collection, turn the vehicle off, wait for a few seconds, then start the
vehicle up again. This provides a second (post-test) time-alignment
stamp for all recorded parameters.
46
Perform a gas
audit
System Setup /Audit
Immediately after testing has been completed, and before any
equipment is removed from the vehicle, perform a post-test gas audit.
This step is necessary in order to help quantify analyzer drift during
testing. Use "gas audit" procedures outlined above.
47
Backup and
transfer data
Test data should be copied to a remote, non-volatile medium and
archived.
48
Recharge
batteries
After testing is concluded, ensure all batteries are charged for future
testing. (Note: Make sure a powered-on SEMTECH is not connected
to the power supply while charging batteries. The power supply is
unable to charge batteries and power the SEMTECH unit
concurrently.
December 30, 2004
Page 8 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part B: Selection of OBDII Communication Protocol for VI
Try to find the correct communication protocol using the "OBDII Generic Communication
Protocols by Manufacturer" table. If the vehicle is not listed, or if communication is not
established, the general guidance below may be of benefit.
The image below indicates pin locations on a typical OBDII connector. Metal contacts in
these pin locations, as described in the table below, can sometimes be used to determine
the communication protocol used by the vehicle.
Pin 2 Pin 4 Pin 5 Pin 7
i
Pin 10
Pin 15 Pin 16
Communication Protocol
SAE-J1850 VPW
(Variable Pulse Width)
SAE-J1850PWM
(Pulse Width Modulation)
ISO-9141-2
ISO-14230
(Keyword Protocol 2000)
ISO-11898
(Controller Area Network)
ISO-15765
(Controller Area Network)
SAE-J1939
(Controller Area Network)
SAE-J1708
Pin Locations and Typical Manufacturers
Pins 2, 4, 5, and 16 (NOT 10)
General Motors vehicles (including Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, CMC,
Olds, Pontiac, Saturn), some "older" Chrysler vehicles (96-99) and select
other vehicles ('03 Chrysler PT Cruiser, '02 Dodge Neon, '98 Isuzo
Trooper, '03 Jeep Liberty, and '97 Toyota Corolla)
Pins 2, 4, 5, 10, and 16
Generally "older" (96-99) Ford vehicles (including Mercury and the Mazda
B-Series pickups and Tribute)
Pins 4, 5, 7, 16, and sometimes 15
Typically newer Chrysler, Ford, European, and most Asian vehicles (such
as Acura, Audi, BMW, Citroen, Fiat, Honda, Hyundai, Infiniti, Jaguar, Kia,
Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mini, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Open,
Peugeot, Renault, Saab, Subaru, Suzuki, Toyota, Volkswagen, Volvo,
and some oddballs such as '96 Chrysler vans, '97 Chev Camaro, various
Dodge vehicles, some Jeep Grand Cherokees, and the '96 Geo Metro)
Pins 4, 5, 7, 16, and sometimes 15
This will probably not be too common. If found, perhaps newer Chrysler,
Ford, European, and Asian vehicles.
A few manufacturers, such as Ford, Saturn (Ion), Saab (9-3), and Mazda
began phasing CAN into their fleets in 2003.
CAN may also be found in select model year 2004 vehicles manufactured
by Bentley, Chrysler, Ford (family), GM (family), Saab, Mazda, Mercedes,
Toyota/Lexus, and Volvo.
This is primarily used on heavy-duty vehicles
This is primarily used on heavy-duty vehicles
December 30, 2004
Page 9 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part C: Audit and Span Gas Information
Calibration and Audit Gas Blend Ranges
Low-range gasses - Use blends similar to that shown in the table below when auditing and
span calibrating the SEMTECH for testing newer, low-emitting vehicles.
Gas
HC
CO
C02
NOX
Audit Gas Blend
30 to 50 ppm (propane)
(or90-150ppmTHC)
200 - 400 ppm
4 - 6 %
200 - 400 ppm
Span Cal Gas Blend
200 - 300 ppm (propane)
(or 600 -900 ppm THC)
1,200-1,400 ppm
12-14%
1,500-2,000 ppm
High-range gasses - Use blends similar to those shown in the table below when auditing
and span calibrating the SEMTECH for testing older, potentially higher-emitting vehicles.
Note that these are standardized BAR97 blends.
Gas
HC
CO
C02
NOX
Audit Gas Blend
(BAR97 Low)
300 ppm (propane)
(or 900 ppm THC)
0.5% (5,000 ppm)
6%
300 ppm
Span Cal Gas Blend
(BAR97 High)
3,200 ppm (propane)
(or 9,600 ppm THC)
8%
12%
3,000 ppm
Note: When performing a span calibration, use the span range appropriate for the HC
concentration in the blend being used. The range selected should be within 15% of the
HC concentration in the gas blend. Use the 1,000 ppm range for the low-range gas span,
and the 10,000 ppm range for the high-range gas span.
Note: To convert from a percentage to PPM, multiply by 10,000
December 30, 2004
Page 10 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part D: Performing Visual Inspections of Emissions Equipment
For 1970 and newer vehicles, an emissions control component inspection should begin with a review
of the vehicle's "vehicle emissions control" (VEC) label. If present, this will be located in the engine
compartment, generally on the underside of the hood. The VEC label lists the vehicle's type of
emissions certification, vehicle model year, and the pollution control components that were originally
present on the vehicle. After the VEC label has been reviewed, the components should be physically
inspected, to ensure they appear functional and have not been removed (removal is common for older
vehicles).
Positive Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) System
Inspect engines for rubber lines « 5/8" in diameter running from the valve cover to the intake
manifold, intake air plenum, or air filter assembly. If these are present, the engine is probably
equipped with a PCV valve. Verify by looking for the valve inserted into one of the hoses
going into the valve cover.
Thermostatic Air Cleaner (TAC) System
Generally present on carbureted vehicles (although some throttle-body injected vehicles may
be equipped with a TAC system). A TAC system may be identified by a flexible tube
approximately 2" in diameter routed from an exhaust manifold to the air cleaner's inlet
snorkel. Note damaged/missing tubing or snorkel valves.
Air Injection System (AIS)
This is generally either an air pump mounted on the front of the engine and driven by a belt or
a "pulse air valve" box also mounted near the front of the engine. Either system will have
tubes leading from the pump (or valve) to the exhaust manifold or exhaust pipe. Please note
missing belts or damaged/missing tubing, since these will render the system inoperable.
Exhaust Gas Recirculation (ERG) System
The EGR valve is usually located on intake manifold or intake air plenum, with an external
metal tube often connecting a point on the exhaust manifold to the EGR valve. The EGR
valve is generally 2" to 3" high and 2" to 3" in diameter and will have either a vacuum
diaphragm or an electronic solenoid.
Evaporative Emissions Control System (EECS)
Generally the best way to determine if a vehicle has an EECS is by reading the VEC label.
The EECS is a combination of tubing, canisters, and valves attached to the fuel tank and fuel
lines to control evaporative emissions. If information cannot be obtained from the vehicles'
VEC, indicate "unknown" on the data collection sheet.
Catalytic Converter
The catalytic converter is located in the exhaust system upstream of the muffler. Unlike
mufflers, which generally have square ends, catalytic converters are typically tapered at their
ends. On newer vehicles, catalytic converters are typically integrated with or directly behind
the exhaust manifold.
December 30, 2004 Page 11 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part D: Performing Visual Inspections of Emissions Equipment
Fuel Fill Pipe Restrictor
This is simply a thin metal ring inside the fuel filler neck inlet (to prevent use of large-
diameter leaded fuel nozzle). Remove fuel cap to verify presence of a fill pipe restrictor.
Oxygen Sensors
These are designated as O2 or HO2S on VEC labels. Fuel injected vehicles (including TBI &
TPI) will be equipped with oxygen sensors. Verify presence at an O2 sensor by inspecting the
exhaust system upstream of the catalytic converter. The O2 sensor will be located in the
exhaust manifold or pipe directly after the manifold. The sensor will generally be the size of
a spark plug and have one or more wires coming from it. Please note any missing oxygen
sensors or damaged/disconnected wiring.
December 30, 2004 Page 12 of 13
-------
SEMTECH Installation Guidelines for the Kansas City Study
Part E: How to Configure Host Computer to Communication With the
SEMTECH through an Ethernet Cable
These are based on XP operating systems. Other systems may vary somewhat.
Select "My Computer" Icon on desktop
Select "Control Panel" when the "My Computer" screen pops up
Select the "Network Connections" icon in the "Control Panel" screen
Either create new connection (LAN, NOT wireless) or open existing LAN connection
Ensure "Internet Protocol" TCP/IP is checked, and highlighted
Once the "Internet Protocol TCP/IP" is highlighted, select "Properties"
Select "Use the following IP address", and enter "10.10.1.#", where number is the last 2
digits of the SEMTECH's IP address (use NO leading zeros). If the SEMTECH's IP address
is unknown, this may be assigned. Don't assign it "55" (since this is the default for new
units), and don't assign it to be the same as any of the other SEMTECHs (otherwise
wireless communication will be screwed up). Then, enter "255.255.255.0" for the subnet
mask. " Leave everything else on the screen (such as default gateway, preferred DNS
server, etc.) blank. Select "Use the following DNS server addresses", but leave all rows
blank. Select "OK", and exit the connection screens.
If after SEMTECH login the host does not recognize the SEMTECH, try creating a
connection manually by right-clicking on the connection icon on the lower right of the
screen.
December 30, 2004 Page 13 of 13
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix J
Round 2 SEMTECH Checklist
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Vehicle License
Date
VEHICLE INFORMATION PACKET FOR KC 480 VEHICLE STUDY
ROUND 2 TESTING
General Vehicle Information Packet Cover sheet
Make:
Color:
Model:
Model Year:
# of doors:
BKI Run Number(s):
Fuel Collected?
Test Inertia:
Smoke Observation:
BKI Information Below
Yes Q No
Collected? Q Yes Q No
Test HP
Q None Q Light Q Medium Q Heavy
Did MIL illuminate during testing? Yes / No If "Yes", please note date(s) and time(s),
download the trouble codes, and list the trouble codes on the next page.
December 30, 2004
Page 1 of 14
-------
Vehicle License
Date
KC 480 Vehicle Study SEMTECH Round 2 Testing
General Vehicle Information
ERG staff to perform OBDII scans and record OBDII information
Pre-Testing OBDII Check
Please list communication protocol shown on code reader display:
Turn vehicle on. Is MIL light on? (check engine, service engine soon)
Yes
No
Downloaded MIL Status: Q MIL Commanded on
Please indicate which OBDII monitors are NOT ready:
Q Catalyst Q Ox Sensor Other(s):
MIL Commanded off
Evap system Q EGR
Q None
Confirmed Codes: P
None
Pending Codes:
None
Post-Testing OBDII Check (only if MIL illuminates during testing)
Turn vehicle on. Is MIL light on? (check engine, service engine soon) Q Yes
No
Downloaded MIL Status: Q MIL Commanded on
Please indicate which OBDII monitors are NOT ready:
Q Catalyst Q Ox Sensor Other(s):
MIL Commanded off
Evap system Q EGR
Q None
Confirmed Codes: P
None
Pending Codes:
None
December 30, 2004
Page 2 of 14
-------
Vehicle License
Date
Odometer:
VIN:
Vehicle Type:
KC 480 Vehicle Study SEMTECH Round 2 Testing
General Vehicle Information
(Miles / Km) Air Conditioning? Yes / No
QCar
Truck
QVan
Qsuv
Mfr Date (on doorjamb) I Total GVWR ( on doorjamb): Lbs / kg
Drive Type: rj FWD Q RWD Q On-demand 4WD Q Full-time 4WD
Q Automatic transmission
With overdrive Q Without overdrive
Q Manual transmission
Circle # of Forward Gears: 3456, Unk
Engine and Emission Survey Information
(note: the majority of the following information is listed on the underhood emissions
certification decal, as shown below. Use Part D of the "Installation Guidelines" for additional
info on visually confirming items. )
DaimlerChrysler
Corporation
04578225AB*
CATALYST
2TWC, 2H02S(2),
SFI. 06D II
CERTIFIED
VEHICLE EMISSION C^TROL INFORMATION
THIS VEHICLE CONFORMS/0 U.S. EPA INTERIM NON-TIER 2 BIN 9
REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GASOLINE FUELED 2004 MODEL
YEAR NEW PASSENGER CARS AND QUALIFIES AS A ULEV1
UNDER CALIFOjmA CLEANEST VEHICLE REGULATIONS
'BASIC IGMfflON TIMING AND
FUEL IMECTION MIXTURE HAVE
BEEWf RESET AT THE FACTORY.
ADJUSTMENTS SHOULD NOT BE
JftDE DURING ROUTINE SERVICE
XCAUTION: APPLY PARKING BRAKE
/ WHEN SERVICING VEHICLE.
This box lists the emission control
components: 2TWC = catalytic
converters (dual three-way);
2HO2S = oxygen sensors (two
heated ox sensors); SFI = port
injection (sequential fuel
injection). Look here also for
"PCV", AIR, TAG, and EGR.
2.7 LITER
4CRXV02.7VHO
RXR0130GBA
? PARK PLUGS
>AP 0.050 in./
1.27 mm
RE10PMC5
This box lists the
displacement (2.7 L),
engine family (top#),
and evaporative family
(bottom #).
This area shows the
engine's vacuum routing.
Look here for evaporative
system (including the
words "evap" and or
"canister"). Also check
for PCV and EGR.
This box lists engine
certification year (2004)
and certification level
(Tier 2, Bin 8, California
ULEV1)
December 30, 2004
Page 3 of 14
-------
Vehicle License
Date
KC 480 Vehicle Study SEMTECH Round 2 Testing
General Vehicle Information
# of Cylinders:
Displacement:
Irr
Note: The underhood label will list the displacement, but probably not the # of cylinders. The # of ignition wires
may indicate the number of cylinders. If you're not certain, just leave "# of cylinders" blank.
Engine Certification Year
Emissions Cert:
USEPA
QOBDI QOBD
California
QNoOBD
Canada
Other certification info from hood sticker (i.e., Tier 2, ULEV, etc.)
System
Yes No Unk
System
Yes No Unk
Positive Crankcase
Ventilation (listed as "PCV" on
iahf*r\
Thermostatic Air Cleaner
Assembly (listed as "TAG" on
label. Verify assembly is still
present.)
Air Injection (listed as "AIR" on
label. Verify system is still
oresent.)
Exhaust Gas Recirculation
(listed as "EGR"on label, verify
still present if vehicle is older than
1996.)
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Evaporative Emissions
Control System (Diagram
will be on label, if present.
Look for words "evap canister')
Catalytic Converter (listed
as "CAT', "TWO", etc. on
label. Visually verify presence
of cat under vehicle.)
Fuel Fillpipe Restrictor
(Remove fuel cap to verify)
Oxygen Sensor (listed as
"Ox", "02", or "H02S" on label.
Verify presence if vehicle is
older than 1996.)
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Engine Family (top # on sticker)
Evaporative Family (bottom # on sticker)
Fuel Delivery: Q Qarb Q Port Fuel-Injected Q Throttle-body Q Hybrid
Note: Port fuel-injected vehicles will have "MPI", "SFI", "MPFI" listed on underhood sticker. Note that the
presence of the words "throttle-body" on label does not mean the vehicle has "throttle-body" fuel delivery (throttle-
body on the label generally refers to point of air delivery). Please leave fuel delivery blank if not certain.
Air Intake:
Normal
Turbocharged
Supercharged
December 30, 2004
Page 4 of 14
-------
Part 1: SEMTECH Installation for Round 2 Preconditioning Drives
Data Collection Sheet
Date
Installation Tech:
Vehicle License:
PEM Serial Number
SEMTECH System Information
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen
FID Fuel Pressure:
(psig)
Battery Voltage:
(V)
Ambient Temperature:
Independent Weather Station Data
(deg C) Relative Humidity:
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen (After warmup is complete)
FID Oven Temperature:
(degC) Chiller Temp:
(deg C)
Pambient
Pi
SEMTECH System Pressures
(mbar) P2
(mbar)
(mbar)
OBDII Communication Protocol for Vehicle Interface
Note: use the "AutoXray" OBDII scanner to determine type of communication protocol. If that is unsuccessful,
use Part B of the "Installation Guidelines".
Q SAE-J1850VPW Q SAE-J1850 PWM Q ISO-14230 Q ISO-9141-2
Q ISO-11898 Q ISO-15765 Q SAE-J1939 Q SAE-J1708
Q Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communication protocols.
Zero, Audit, and Span Cylinder Numbers
Zero gas cylinder ID #
Audit Gas Cylinder ID #
Span Gas Cylinder ID #
December 30, 2004
Page 5 of 14
-------
Part 1: SEMTECH Installation for Round 2 Preconditioning Drives
Installation Checklist
Vehicle License_
#
Task
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
1
2
12
13
19
4,
5,
14
15
16
17
18
N/A
3
N/A
10
11
21
43
22
N/A
7
25
8
9
Install SEMTECH & battery in trunk,
connect power supply, turn SEMTECH
on. Ensure positive battery terminal is
covered with boot.
Install FID drain and autozero
(ambient) tubes, run outside trunk
Install GPS (wipe base clean)
Install weather probe
Install VI (where it won't be kicked)
Install and purge correct size flow
meter and matched control box.
Ensure shielding is away from battery.
Plug in external thermocouple
Logon with host computer
Verify comm. with right SEMTECH
Perform a SEMTECH leak check
Verify analyzer sample intervals are
system control = 1000 ms, FID = 500
ms, NDIR=1200, NDUV = 500 ms.
Acquire VI
Set HC range to 10,000.
Acquire GPS, aux temp, & flowmeter.
Set CO units to PPM.
In Config 3, enable autozero (all but
CH4), 120 mins, 5 ppm drift)
Close FID bottle, then do a FID leak
check (<1 psi/minute decay)
Disconnect power supply, verify and
record battery voltage
Record ambient conditions
Ensure P1, P2, P3 are within 200 psi
Task
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
12
N/A
26
28
29
30
44
NA
24
31
NA
32
33
34-
39
42
40
N/A
46
NA
N/A
N/A
Open FID bottle, Ignite FID (15 minutes
before testing). Check FID pressure, replace
if under 200 PSI. Ensure outlet regulator is
set to 30 PSI output.
Ensure EXFM box pressure/temp LEDs are
off, and autozero is on
Set transport delays (6,6,0,5,5,0), mass calc
from flow meter, speed from GPS, RPM from
ECM. Calc limits© 1000 RPM/s, 21.0
mph/s, 0.050 gal/s, & 0.50 %C. HC ratio @
1.8&SG@0.744.
Enter test info, flowmeter ID #, notes, select
all post-processing output groups, save setup
and exit
Start vehicle & verify data in road test screen
Use "ST_PLATE_precond" for filename
Check for system faults and warnings, verify
warm-up, record temperatures
After installation review, begin session mgr
Record cylinder numbers on sheet
Perform a zero calibration
Perform gas and O2 audits (and calibrations
and reaudits, if needed).
START THE TEST (in the session manager)
Prepare vehicle for testing, close trunk, have
picture taken of flowmeter setup
Do precond run, watch road test screen
After precond run, stop test, do a post-test
audit and then a zero (zero on ambient)
Stop and close the session manager, turn
FID off
Remove equipment, purge flowmeter, charge
battery
Ensure test file is uploaded
December 30, 2004
Page 6 of 14
-------
Part 2: SEMTECH Installation for Round 2 Dyne Sampling
Data Collection Sheet
Date
Installation Tech:
Vehicle License
PEM Serial Number
SEMTECH System Information
FID Fuel Pressure:
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen
(psig)
Ambient Temperature:
Independent Weather Station Data
(deg C) Relative Humidity:
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen (After warmup is complete)
FID Oven Temperature:
(degC) Chiller Temp:
(deg C)
SEMTECH System Pressures
ambient
(mbar) P2
(mbar)
(mbar)
OBDII Communication Protocol for Vehicle Interface
Note: use the "AutoXray" OBDII scanner to determine type of communication protocol. If that is unsuccessful,
use Part B of the "Installation Guidelines".
Q SAE-J1850VPW Q SAE-J1850 PWM Q ISO-14230 Q ISO-9141-2
Q ISO-11898 Q ISO-15765 Q SAE-J1939 Q SAE-J1708
Q Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communication protocols.
Zero, Audit, and Span Gas Information
Zero gas cylinder ID #
Audit Gas Cylinder ID #
Span Gas Cylinder ID #
December 30, 2004
Page 7 of 14
-------
Part 2: SEMTECH Installation for Round 2 Dyne Sampling
Installation Checklist
Vehicle License
Task
Task
Q
Q
Q
16
17
18
Ensure weather probe & external temp
thermocouple are hooked up
Install VI (where it won't be kicked)
Install and purge correct size flow
meter & matched control box.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
10
11
21
43
22
8
9
12
N/A
Perform a SEMTECH leak check
Verify analyzer sample intervals are
system control = 1000 ms, FID = 500
ms, NDIR=1200, NDUV = 500 ms.
Acquire VI
Set HC range to 10,000.
Acquire aux temp & flowmeter. Set
CO units to PPM.
Write ambient conditions
Ensure P1, P2, P3 are within 200 psi
Open FID bottle, Ignite FID (15
minutes before testing)
Ensure EXFM box pressure/temp
LEDs are off, and autozero is on
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
26
28
29
30
44
NA
24
31
NA
32
33
34-
39
42
44
46
NA
N/A
N/A
Set transport delays (6,6,0,5,5,0), mass calc
from flow meter, speed from ECM, RPM from
ECM. Calc limits© 1000 RPM/s, 21.0
mph/s, 0.050 gal/s, & 0.50 %C. HC ratio @
1.8&SG@0.744.
Enter test info, flowmeter ID #, notes, select
all post-processing output groups, save setup
and exit
In Road Test screen, ensure VI is acquired,
exhaust flowmeter temp is valid, and weather
station and aux temp data is acquired
Use "ST_PLATE_run #" for filename
Check for system faults and warnings, verify
warm-up, record temperatures
Begin the session manager
Record cylinder numbers on sheet
Perform a zero calibration
Perform gas and O2 audits (and calibrations
and reaudits, if needed).
START THE TEST (in the session manager)
During dyne run, watch road test screen for
dilution, HC range, etc. Adjust HC range as
needed, but don't peg readings.
After dyne run, stop test, do a post-test audit
and then a zero (zero on ambient)
Stop and close the session manager, turn
FID off
Purge flowmeter after each run.
Ensure test files are uploaded (daily is OK)
December 30, 2004
Page 8 of 14
-------
Part 3: SEMTECH Installation for Round 2 Vehicle Driveaways
Data Collection Sheet
Date
Installation Tech:
Vehicle License
PEM Serial Number
SEMTECH System Information
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen
FID Fuel Pressure:
(psig)
Battery Voltage:
(V)
Ambient Temperature:
Independent Weather Station Data
(deg C) Relative Humidity:
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen (After warmup is complete)
FID Oven Temperature:
(degC) Chiller Temp:
(deg C)
SEMTECH System Pressures
ambient
(mbar) P2
(mbar)
(mbar)
OBDII Communication Protocol for Vehicle Interface
Note: use the "AutoXray" OBDII scanner to determine type of communication protocol. If that is unsuccessful,
use Part B of the "Installation Guidelines".
Q SAE-J1850VPW Q SAE-J1850 PWM Q ISO-14230 Q ISO-9141-2
Q ISO-11898 Q ISO-15765 Q SAE-J1939 Q SAE-J1708
Q Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communication protocols.
Zero, Audit, and Span Gas Information
Zero gas cylinder ID #
Audit Gas Cylinder ID #
Span Gas Cylinder ID #
December 30, 2004
Page 9 of 14
-------
Part 3: SEMTECH Installation for Round 2 Vehicle Driveaways
Installation Checklist
Vehicle License
Task
Task
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
1
2
12
13
19
4,
5,
14
15
16
17
18
N/A
3
N/A
10
11
21
43
22
N/A
7
25
8
Install SEMTECH & 2 batteries in
trunk, connect power supply, turn
SEMTECH on. Ensure positive battery
terminals are covered with boots.
Replace FID bottle (outlet @ 30 psi),
open FID fuel supply, Install FID drain
and autozero (ambient) tubes, run
outside trunk
Install GPS (wipe base clean first)
Install weather probe
Install VI (where it won't be kicked)
Install and purge correct size flow
meter & matched control box. Ensure
shielding is away from batteries.
Plug in external thermocouple
Logon with host computer
Verify comm. with right SEMTECH
Perform a SEMTECH leak check
Verify analyzer sample intervals are
system control = 1000 ms, FID = 500
ms, NDIR=1200, NDUV = 500 ms.
Acquire VI
Set HC range to 10,000.
Acquire GPS, aux temp, & flowmeter.
Set CO units to PPM, set FID to "auto".
In Config 3, enable autozero (all but
CH4), 120 mins, 5 ppm drift)
Close FID bottle, then do a FID leak
check (<1 psi/minute decay)
Disconnect power supply, verify and
write battery voltage of both batteries
Record ambient conditions
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
9
12
N/A
26
28
29
30
44
NA
24
31
NA
32
33
34-
39
42
40
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ensure P1, P2, P3 are within 200 psi
Open FID bottle, Ignite FID (15 minutes
before testing)
Ensure EXFM box pressure/temp LEDs are
off, and autozero is on
Set transport delays (6,6,0,5,5,0), mass calc
from flow meter, speed from GPS, RPM from
ECM. Calc limits© 1000 RPM/s, 21.0
mph/s, 0.050 gal/s, & 0.50 %C. HC ratio @
1.8&SG@0.744.
Enter test info, flowmeter ID #, notes, select
all post-processing output groups, save setup
and exit
Start vehicle & verify data in road test screen
Use "ST_PLATE_driveaway" for filename
Check for system faults and warnings, verify
warm-up, record temperatures
After installation review, begin session mgr
Record cylinder numbers on sheet
Perform a zero calibration
Perform gas and O2 audits (and calibrations
and reaudits, if needed).
START THE TEST (in the session manager)
Prepare vehicle for testing, connect 2nd
battery, pull charger, run Ethernet cord out
trunk, close trunk, seal, etc.
Have picture taken of flowmeter setup
When vehicle returns, remove equipment,
purge flowmeter, charge batteries
Ensure test file is uploaded
December 30, 2004
Page 10 of 14
-------
Part 4: SEMTECH Installation for Replicate Round 2 Precond Drives
Data Collection Sheet
Date
Installation Tech:
Vehicle License
PEM Serial Number
SEMTECH System Information
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen
FID Fuel Pressure:
(psig)
Battery Voltage:
(V)
Ambient Temperature:
Independent Weather Station Data
(deg C) Relative Humidity:
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen (After warmup is complete)
FID Oven Temperature:
(degC) Chiller Temp:
(deg C)
Pambient
Pi
SEMTECH System Pressures
(mbar) P2
(mbar)
(mbar)
OBDII Communication Protocol for Vehicle Interface
Note: use the "AutoXray" OBDII scanner to determine type of communication protocol. If that is unsuccessful,
use Part B of the "Installation Guidelines".
Q SAE-J1850VPW Q SAE-J1850 PWM Q ISO-14230 Q ISO-9141-2
Q ISO-11898 Q ISO-15765 Q SAE-J1939 Q SAE-J1708
Q Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communication protocols.
Zero, Audit, and Span Gas Information
Zero gas cylinder ID #
Audit Gas Cylinder ID #
Span Gas Cylinder ID #
December 30, 2004
Page 11 of 14
-------
Part 4: SEMTECH Installation for Replicate Round 2 Precond Drives
Installation Checklist
Vehicle License
Task
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
1
2
12
13
19
4,
5,
14
15
16
17
18
N/A
3
N/A
10
11
21
43
22
N/A
7
25
8
9
Install SEMTECH & battery in trunk,
connect power supply, turn SEMTECH
on. Ensure positive battery terminal is
covered with boot.
Install FID drain and autozero
(ambient) tubes, run outside trunk
Install GPS (wipe base clean)
Install weather probe
Install VI (where it won't be kicked)
Install and purge correct size flow
meter and matched control box.
Ensure shielding is away from battery.
Plug in external thermocouple
Logon with host computer
Verify comm. with right SEMTECH
Perform a SEMTECH leak check
Verify analyzer sample intervals are
system control = 1000 ms, FID = 500
ms, NDIR=1200, NDUV = 500 ms.
Acquire VI
Set HC range to 10,000.
Acquire GPS, aux temp, & flowmeter.
Set CO units to PPM.
In Config 3, enable autozero (all but
CH4), 120 mins, 5 ppm drift)
Close FID bottle, then do a FID leak
check (<1 psi/minute decay)
Disconnect power supply, verify and
record battery voltage
Record ambient conditions
Ensure P1, P2, P3 are within 200 psi
Task
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
12
N/A
26
28
29
30
44
NA
24
31
NA
32
33
34-
39
42
40
N/A
46
NA
N/A
N/A
Open FID bottle, Ignite FID (15 minutes
before testing). Check FID pressure, replace
if under 200 PSI. Ensure outlet regulator is
set to 30 PSI output.
Ensure EXFM box pressure/temp LEDs are
off, and autozero is on
Set transport delays (6,6,0,5,5,0), mass calc
from flow meter, speed from GPS, RPM from
ECM. Calc limits© 1000 RPM/s, 21.0
mph/s, 0.050 gal/s, & 0.50 %C. HC ratio @
1.8&SG@0.744.
Enter test info, flowmeter ID #, notes, select
all post-processing output groups, save setup
and exit
Start vehicle & verify data in road test screen
Use "ST_PLATE_precond_rep" for filename
Check for system faults and warnings, verify
warm-up, record temperatures
After installation review, begin session mgr
Record cylinder numbers on sheet
Perform a zero calibration
Perform gas and O2 audits (and calibrations
and reaudits, if needed).
START THE TEST (in the session manager)
Prepare vehicle for testing, close trunk, have
picture taken of flowmeter setup
Do precond run, watch road test screen
After precond run, stop test, do a post-test
audit and then a zero (zero on ambient)
Stop and close the session manager, turn
FID off
Remove equipment, purge flowmeter, charge
battery
Ensure test file is uploaded
December 30, 2004
Page 12 of 14
-------
Part 5: SEMTECH Installation for Replicate Round 2 Dyne Sampling
Data Collection Sheet
Date
Installation Tech:
Vehicle License
PEM Serial Number
SEMTECH System Information
FID Fuel Pressure:
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen
(psig)
Ambient Temperature:
Independent Weather Station Data
(deg C) Relative Humidity:
SEMTECH Status Summary Screen (After warmup is complete)
FID Oven Temperature:
(degC) Chiller Temp:
(deg C)
Pambient
Pi
SEMTECH System Pressures
(mbar) P2
(mbar)
(mbar)
OBDII Communication Protocol for Vehicle Interface
Note: use the "AutoXray" OBDII scanner to determine type of communication protocol. If that is unsuccessful,
use Part B of the "Installation Guidelines".
Q SAE-J1850VPW Q SAE-J1850 PWM Q ISO-14230 Q ISO-9141-2
Q ISO-11898 Q ISO-15765 Q SAE-J1939 Q SAE-J1708
Q Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communication protocols.
Zero, Audit, and Span Gas Information
Zero gas cylinder ID #
Audit Gas Cylinder ID #
Span Gas Cylinder ID #
December 30, 2004
Page 13 of 14
-------
Part 5: SEMTECH Installation for Replicate Round 2 Dyne Sampling
Installation Checklist
Vehicle License
Task
Task
Q
Q
Q
16
17
18
Ensure weather probe & external temp
thermocouple are hooked up
Install VI (where it won't be kicked)
Install and purge correct size flow
meter & matched control box.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
10
11
21
43
22
8
9
12
N/A
Perform a SEMTECH leak check
Verify analyzer sample intervals are
system control = 1000 ms, FID = 500
ms, NDIR=1200, NDUV = 500 ms.
Acquire VI
Set HC range to 10,000.
Acquire aux temp & flowmeter. Set
CO units to PPM.
Write ambient conditions
Ensure P1, P2, P3 are within 200 psi
Open FID bottle, Ignite FID (15
minutes before testing)
Ensure EXFM box pressure/temp
LEDs are off, and autozero is on
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
26
28
29
30
44
NA
24
31
NA
32
33
34-
39
42
44
46
NA
N/A
N/A
Set transport delays (6,6,0,5,5,0), mass calc
from flow meter, speed from ECM, RPM from
ECM. Calc limits© 1000 RPM/s, 21.0
mph/s, 0.050 gal/s, & 0.50 %C. HC ratio @
1.8&SG@0.744.
Enter test info, flowmeter ID #, notes, select
all post-processing output groups, save setup
and exit
In Road Test screen, ensure VI is acquired,
exhaust flowmeter temp is valid, and weather
station and aux temp data is acquired
Use "ST_PLATE_run #_rep" for filename
Check for system faults and warnings, verify
warm-up, record temperatures
Begin the session manager
Record cylinder numbers on sheet
Perform a zero calibration
Perform gas and O2 audits (and calibrations
and reaudits, if needed).
START THE TEST (in the session manager)
During dyne run, watch road test screen for
dilution, HC range, etc. Adjust HC range as
needed, but don't peg readings.
After dyne run, stop test, do a post-test audit
and then a zero (zero on ambient)
Stop and close the session manager, turn
FID off
Purge flowmeter after each run.
Ensure test files are uploaded (daily is OK)
December 30, 2004
Page 14 of 14
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix K
Revised Conditioning Routes for
Final Round 2 Report
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Two potential conditioning routes were established, Route A and Route B. Route A is the shorter
of the two routes, being ~ 8 miles in length. Route A consists of a single heavy acceleration to
enter the freeway and -1.5 miles of high speed driving, 1.5 miles of moderate speeds, and the
rest stop and go driving. Route B involved more high speed and moderate speed driving with a
total length of- 18.6 mi.
Specifics for each route are given below from the test facility at 6636 Berger Ave, Kansas City,
Kansas, 66111.
Route A (8.2 miles)
1. From 6636 Berger Ave test facility, left onto Berger Ave, then immediate left (east) onto
KAW (32).
2. Eastbound on KAW - 0.3 mi and turn left (north) onto 65th St.
3. Northbound on 65th St - 0.50 mi and turn left (northwest) onto Turner-Diagonal Parkway
(132).
4. Westbound on 132 - 1.4 mi and turn left (west) onto State Avenue .
5. Westbound on State Ave - 1.5 mi and turn left (south) onto 82nd St.
6. Southbound on 82nd St - 0.50 mi and turn left (east) onto Tauromee Ave.
6. Eastbound on Tauromee -0.50 mi and turn right (south) onto 78th St.
7. Southbound on 78th - 1.5 mi and turn left (east) onto Kansas Ave.
8. Eastbound on Kansas Ave - 1.4 mi and turn left (north) onto 68th St.
9. Northbound on 68th St - 0.2 mi and turn right (east) onto Berger Ave.
10. Eastbound on Berger Ave - 0.2 mi and turn left into 6636 Berger test facility.
Route B (18.6 miles)
1. From 6636 Berger Ave test facility, left onto Berger Ave, then immediate left (east) onto
KAW (32).
2. Eastbound on KAW - 0.3 mi and turn left (north) onto 65th St.
3. Northbound on 65th St - 0.50 mi and turn left (northwest) onto Turner-Diagonal Parkway
(132).
-------
4. Westbound on 132 ~ 0.9 mi and exit left onto westbound 1-70
5. Westbound on 1-70 -3.7 miles, turn right onto northbound 1-435
6. Northbound 1-435 ~ 0.9 mi and exit at State Ave.
7. Take cloverleaf back onto 1-435 southbound (0.6 mi)
8. Southbound 1-435 ~ 0.8 mi, exit to eastbound 1-70
9. Eastbound 1-70 ~ 3.9 mi and turn left (north) onto Turner-Diagonal Parkway (132).
10. Northbound on 132 ~ 0.9 mi and turn left (west) onto State Avenue
11. Westbound on State Ave. ~ 1.5 mi and turn left (south) onto 82nd St.
12. Southbound on 82nd St ~ 0.6 miles and turn left (east) onto Tauromee Ave.
13. Eastbound on Tauromee ~ 0.5 mi and turn right (south) onto 78th St.
14. Southbound on 78th St ~ 1.6 miles and turn left (east) onto Kansas Ave.
15. Eastbound on Kansas Ave ~ 1.4 mi and turn left (north) onto 68th St.
16. Northbound on 68th St ~ 0.2 mi and turn right (east) onto Berger Ave.
17. Eastbound on Berger Ave ~ 0.2 miles to 6636 Berger Ave. test facility
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix L
PEMS Fuel Economy
Calculation Equations Only
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
The following equations are used by the SEMTECH-G in calculating emissions and fuel economy. These
equations are presented in Revision 2.2 of the SEMTECH-G User Manual. Additional details regarding
computations performed by the SEMTECH-G may be found in the SEMTECH-G User's Manual.,
• Dry-to-wet conversion factor, Kw = 1 - [/-/20]condensed
where [H20]condensed = [H20]exhausf - [H20]res/dua,
• Standard Volumetric Exhaust Flow Rate:
•
m
where
D
^exhaust
A
P
latm
RexhauJ Re,haust(293°K)
I
- atm\
R°
(
0.0821
1
f 1-
^mol
atm 1
--K)
^g-°K) MWeAaust MWexhaust(g/mol)
and
• Instantaneous Mass Emissions
_. ,, , . x [Pollutant 1 , T.
Pollutant (grams I sec) = - - ^^ x V
Vstll
Kh =
-{ - - - ,
[l - .0047 x(h- 75)]
where h is the absolute humidity in grains/lb of dry air, given by:
4
~
where RH is the relative humidity (%) and Ps the saturation vapor pressure in mm-Hg at
the engine intake air dry-bulb temperature, is empirically derived using the following equation from the
ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70, 1990 (Jensen, et al).
Ps(kPa) =
16.787^- 116.9
Tsample + 237.3
-------
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix M
Offsite Quality Assurance and
Analysis
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
PEMS Data integrity and quality check queries
ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Query
Collect test times
If MY> 1995, has
VI been collected?
Are transport delays
appropriate?
Is test duration
appropriate?
Is correct speed
used?
Is test distance
appropriate?
Does the test have
faults/warnings?
Is test preceded by
a "passed" audit?
Is test followed by a
"passed" audit?
Are pre-test and
post-test gas audit
values correct?
Is dilution
reasonable?
Is flow collected?
Pre-test fields
"Test Start Time" and "Test
End Time"
"Vehicle Interface Type"
"AMBII Delay(s)", "NDUV
Delay(s)", "SCB Delay(s)",
THC"FIDDelay(s)",
"Methabe FID Delays", "Flow
Meter Delay(s)"
N/A-NOTE: don't use
"Test Duration(s)" field
iVEH_SPEED_USED
"Total Distance Traveled
(mi)" (for Precond runs and
driveaways)
"Faults:", "Warnings:"
"Audit"
"Audit"
"Audit"
N/A
N/A
Test record
columns
N/A
"Vehicle
Responding"
N/A
Test time (i.e., total
# of seconds after
CO + CO2 is > 5)
N/A
"External Analog
Inputs" (for dyne
testing)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
"CO", "CO2" %
(wet corrected
"Exhaust Mass
Flow Rate"
Criteria
These will be used in audit queries
If enabled/collected, OK
Else, flag
Values should be 6,6,0,5,5,0, respectively
For Precond runs: If duration is < 1000, flag
For Dyne testing: If duration is < 2340, flag
For Driveaways: If duration is < 18000, flag
For Precond runs: If not equal to "iGPS_GROUND_SPEED",
flag
For Dyne testing: N/A
For Driveaways: If not equal to "iGPS GROUND SPEED",
flag
For Precond runs: if "Total Distance Traveled (mi)" < 7.5, flag
For Dyne testing: if total distance determined using converted
"External Analog Input 3" < 9.7 miles
For Driveaways: If "Total Distance Traveled (mi)" < 10, flag
If yes, list faults and warnings by test id
Using test times previously collected, find last audit immediately
before test. If no audit, or audit has a failure, flag
For precond runs and dyne testing, using test times previously
collected, find audit performed after test. If no audit, or audit
has a failure, flag. Disregard for driveaways.
Ensure gas bottle values are within range for all pollutants
(CO=200 + 5, CO2=6 + 0.1, NOx=300 + 5, THC = 50 + .2)
lfCO + CO2< 13, flag
If all = zero or null, flag
Page 1 of 5
-------
ID
13
14
15
Query
Is post-processor
version correct?
Max, avg, mean
mass flow rate by
displacement plots
and output file
Avg mpg by
displacement and
output plots
Pre-test fields
"Post-Processor DLL
Version"
"Engine Displacement"
"Engine Displacement",
"Overall Fuel Economy
(mpg)"
Test record
columns
N/A
"Corrected mass
flow rate (kg/hr)",
"iGPS_ground
_speed" (control,
precond, dway),
"iSCB_EAI3"
(dyne)
N/A
Criteria
5.4
For each test record, drop all obs with speed < 1 mph
Calculate max, avg, and mean mass flow rate for each test
Print 3 scatter plots, x-axis is displacement (L), y-axis is mass
flow rate. Output CSV file with test ID, max, avg, mean mass
flow rates, displacement (to find records that should be
manually reviewed)
For each test record, either use mpg from pre-test, or the one
we calculate with independent equation. Print scatter plot with
x-axis displacement, y-axis is fuel economy. Output CSV file
with test ID, fuel economy, displacement.
Page 2 of 5
-------
ID
16
Query
Test value output
for tests with
suspect mileage
values
Pre-test fields
"Engine Displacement",
"Overall Fuel Economy
(mpg)", "Total Distance
Traveled (mi)"
Test record
columns
"iGPS_ground
_speed" (control,
precond, dway),
"iSCB_EAI3"
(dyne)
Criteria
For each test record, either use mpg from pre-test info, or the
one we calculate with independent equation. Then, for various
engine size groupings, we'll do a mpg range screening. If the
values fall outside the screening range, we'll want to do some
calcs and output test info and the calculated values to a CSV
file for manual review.
Record suspect if A < disp Z,
. Perhaps for 1st groups, then do the following:
<2 L, 20 mpg to 30 mpg
2L to 2.5L, 15 mpg to 25 mpg
2.5L to 3L, 10 mpg to 20 mpg
3L to 3.5L, 10 mpg to 20 mpg
3.5L to 4L, 10 mpg to 20 mpg
4L to 4.5L, 10 mpg to 20 mpg
4.5L to 5L, 10 mpg to 20 mpg
>5L, 10 mpg to 20 mpg
We will need to tweak engine/mpg groupings to set appropriate
screening limits. Maybe do a proc freq of mpg by displacement
group to get initial settings.
For each record that falls outside limits, drop all obs with speed
< 1 mph and with a corrected exhaust flow rate column
(icMASS_FLOW, kg/hr) less than 10 kg/hr. Calculate/output to
CSV test ID, MY, make, model, displacement, mpg, total dist
traveled, and then max and averages for: iCO2zw (%) + iCOzw
(%), icMASS_FLOW, iFLOW_EX_TEMP, iFLOW_UP_PRESS,
AF_Calc, Lambda.
Page 3 of 5
-------
PEMS results analysis
• Query A:
The intent of this query is to distinguish between the preconditioning portion and the actual driveaway portion of the driveaway files (when
precond and driveaway both exist and are in the same test file)
Precond run start time:
Start of precond run should first second by second records where CO+CO2 > 5 and speed >1
Precond run end time:
The first observation where
If "Cumulative Distance (actual)" (iCALCSUM_Dc) is greater than 7
And if "Ground Speed" (iGPS_GROUND_SPEED) has been less than 1 for at least 5 seconds
And if "iGPS_LAT (deg) is between 39.08999 and 39.0908,
And if "iGPS_LON (deg) is between -94.731 and -94.734,
The preceding portion of the test is the preconditioning run, and the remaining portion of the test is the driveaway
Please provide precond start time, precond end time, precond miles, and precond time duration for each run.
Please provide a plot of speed vs. # of seconds for each of the above tests (one plot for each test record, not broken into segments).
Please also provide the plots with only the first 6000 seconds plotted.
• Query B:
The intent of this query is to determine the fuel economy and emissions for the preconditioning segment of driveaway runs. Then, determine
fuel economy and emissions for the remainder (driveaway portion) of the test.
For tests that meet the conditions of Query A, please list the test file name, and then for each segment (precond and driveaway) please list total
number of seconds, cumulative distance (iCALCSUM_Dc), cumulative fuel economy (iCALCSUM_Wcmpg) and cumulative emissions
(iCALCSUM_CO2cm, iCALCSUM_Cocm, iCALCSUM_kNOcm, iCALCSUM_HCcm) that is listed on the last valid line of the test segment.
In other words, the above values will be listed for both the preconditioning segment and the driveaway segment as determined using Query A.
Note that since cumulative driveaway value includes precond segment, this is being differentiated using the following eqn:
FEdriveaway = [MileStotal X FEoverall] - [MileSprecond X FEpreCond] / [MlleStotal ~ MileSprecond]
= [GallonStotal - GallonSprecond] / [MileSdriveaway]
= [GallonSdriveaway] / [MileSdriveaway]
Page 4 of 5
-------
• Query C:
The intent of this query is to independently calculate fuel economy from the SEMTECH record fields and compare it with the pre-test
SEMTECH mpg values for each SEMTECH test record (Round 2 dyne SEMTECH, Round 2 precond, Round 2 driveaway, Round 1.5 )
Fuel Economy = 2421 / ((CO2 x 0.273) + (HC x 0.866) + (CO x 0.429))
= 2421 / ((iCALCSUM_CO2cm x 0.273) + (iCALCSUM_HCcm x 0.866) + (iCALCSUM_COcm x 0.429)) where iCALCSUM
units are taken from the last valid line of the test record and are in g/mi.
For each record, please list the record name, fuel economy calculated above and the fuel economy listed in the pre-test info.
• Query D:
Please read in the control vehicle runs (located at G:\KansasCity\SEMTECH\Roundl_5\ControlVehicle\KC Rnd 15 control run csvs).
Should be same format as what you've already read in.
Please determine the preconditioning start and end times using the logic defined above. Then, for these control runs, please provide a csv file
that lists for each test record the test ID, vehicle ID, "SEMTECH Serial Number" (from pre-test info), HC, CO, CO2, NOx g/mile emissions,
cumulative distance, and fuel economy (mpg) for the preconditioning run.
Please provide a line plot of fuel economy (left axis) by control run # (horizontal axis test date as label) for all the control runs (one plot with
37 data points).
Please provide plots (by pollutant) of g/mi emissions (left axis) by control run # (horizontal axis with test date as label) for all control runs (four
plots with 37 data points each
Page 5 of 5
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix N
Onsite Quality Assurance and
Analysis
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Notes for Proper SEMTECH Installation, Testing, and Post-Test Procedures
GENERAL
• Ensure power supplies are hooked up and functioning during test preparations (this will help
ensure battery voltages are adequate for testing)
• Ensure test is conducted in a relatively short amount of time after the FID is ignited, and ensure
the FID flame is turned off after the post-test audit is conducted (this will minimize the rate of
depletion of the mini-FID cylinders)
• However, ensure the FID flame has been on for at least 15 minutes before the pre-test zero and
audit are conducted (this will help ensure the FID chamber is stabilized, and therefore reduce
measurement error)
• Ensure exhaust flow tube is oriented such that sample port is closest to tailpipe
• Ensure all malfunctioning equipment is labeled, logged, and removed from service
SOFTWARE SETUP BEFORE "SESSION MANAGER" - These steps help reduce wasted setup time
and wasted test records, since none of these settings may be altered after the "Session Manager" is started.
• Verify GPS, flow meter, and VI (if applicable) values through "Road Test" screen (emissions
cannot be calculated without these parameters)
• Ensure all "Test Setup" values (such as transport delays, calc input settings, upper detection
range(lOk), and vehicle info and notes) are correct. Ensure the correct filename is entered (this
ensures appropriate default settings are set in the file, and it eliminates the time required to
identify proper filenames and rename files during post-processing)
DURING "SESSION MANAGER"
• Ensure the "Session Manager" (and all associated activities) are conducted in the proper sequence
(this helps ensure test records contain all pre and post-test audits and calibrations and also ensures
all test files can be processed). The proper sequence is:
o Ensure all pre-test settings are correct (use "Road Test" screen)
o Open session manager window
o Perform "Test Setup" using "Setup" button (this may also be done before opening the
"Session Manager" window)
o Click the Session Manager "Start" button to start the session manager
o Conduct a pre-test zero
o Conduct a pre-test audit (see notes below)
o Conduct a pre-test span (only if audit fails)
o Conduct a pre-test re-audit (only if a span was conducted)
o Immediately before the test is started, review the "Road Test" screen to ensure GPS, flow
meter, and VI (if applicable) data is still being collected by the SEMTECH
o Click the test "Start" button to start the test
o Do the preconditioning drive
o Click the test "Stop" button to stop the test when the driver returns from the drive
o Conduct a post-test audit - don't worry about it if it fails!
o Conduct a post-test zero
o Click the Session Manager "Stop" button to stop the session manager
o "Close" the Session Manager" window
o Upload, process, and analyzer the test file (see SEMTECH file collection SOPs)
• For spans and audits: Ensure the correct ports and gasses are used, ensure the correct bottle
concentrations are entered, ensure the "THC" gas is set to "propane" before the gas concentration
is entered (so the concentration is not improperly converted), ensure the upper detection range is
appropriate, and ensure any failed pre-test audits are followed by a span and a re-audit (ensures
equipment is properly calibrated before testing)
Page 1 of 3
-------
Immediately Before Vehicle Leaves Checklist
Q Ensure laptop is communicating with the correct SEMTECH
Q Flip FID to "On", then back to "Auto"
Q Verify autozero is enabled
Q Ensure HC range is 10000
Q Ensure installer is entering info for correct vehicle
Q Ensure correct software and firmware are in use
Q Check test settings in setup menu are correct
Q Check road test screen for to check for the following:
Q GPS and VI are being collected
Q exhaust flow is valid (> 2 kg/hr)
Q exhaust flow temp is valid (ambient if vehicle is off, 20 C and up if on)
Q ambient temp and RH is reasonable (same as independent weather station)
Q aux temp is reasonable (close to ambient temp)
Q CO2 >13 (hybrid may be exception of running on electric)
Q FID fuel pressure is sufficient (>1300psi)
Q Chiller and heated FID temperatures are OK (chiller ~ 4 C, FID ~ 193 C)
Q Disconnect power supply, hook in 2nd battery, check voltage
Q Ensure VI cable isn't where it will be kicked off or is in the way of driver
Q Ensure no warnings (i.e., temp or pressure) are displayed on flowmeter transducer box
Q Ensure flowmeter is matched to correct box
Q Verify flowmeter is installed in proper direction
Q Verify the flowmeter has been purged
Q Ensure the SEMTECH has passed a leak check
Q Ensure 2.5" flowmeters used for 3.0 L and larger engines, 2" flowmeters for under 3.0 L
Q Ensure all tubing leading to flowmeter has an equal or greater diameter than that of the flowmeter
Q Ensure tubing has sufficient ground clearance
Q Ensure flowmeter box is placed securely (not on top of SEMTECH)
Q Ensure metalized flowmeter tubing sheath isn't touching battery terminals
Q Ensure boots are on battery terminals
Q Ensure foam is stuffed in trunk lid or hatch gaps, & Ethernet cord is coming out of trunk
Q Ensure test is started (within the session manager)
Q Ensure event marker is set right before preconditioning run
Q Ensure picture has been taken of flowmeter and tubing setup
Q Pull on exhaust tubing setup to make sure all tube connections & flowmeter are secure
Q After preconditioning run, stop the event marker and do the mass emissions rates & mpg analysis
AFTER TESTING IS COMPLETE, TEST STOPPED, & "SESSION MANAGER" IS CLOSED
• Turn FID flame off (helps conserve FID fuel)
• Hook up power supply (to help ensure battery voltage is adequate for next test), purge flowmeter
Page 2 of 3
-------
Rcommended SEMTECH Test Record Review (after testing is completed)
Q Verify a zero and an audit are conducted before the test record was created
U Verify the pre-test audit is either passed or followed by a span and another audit
U Ensure test is preceded by a "passed" audit
U Ensure correct gas concentrations are entered for audits
Q Ensure correct gas concentrations are entered for spans
Q Ensure propane is used for all audits and spans
Q Ensure correct sample ports are used for audits and spans
Q Verify post-test audit was conducted (use test start/end times)
U Verify cumulative emissions are provided (ensures GPS and flowmeter)
U Verify upper concentration limit is appropriate for the vehicle that was tested
Q Check for any faults and warnings
Q Check for appropriate software and firmware versions
Q Sanity check on total distance traveled
U Sanity check on total test duration
U Verify transport delays applied to test are appropriate
U Verify VI is gathered for 1996 and newer vehicles
U Verify flow meter ID number is in test record
Page 3 of 3
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix O
Round 1 Dynamometer PEMS
Quality Control Summary
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Run#
84032
84034
84035
84036
84037
84039
84040
84042
84043
84047
84048
84050
84051
84052
84054
84055
84056
84057
84058
84060
84061
84062
84063
84064
84066
84067
84068
84069
84071
84072
84073
84074
84076
84077
84078
84079
84081
84082
84083
84084
84086
84087
84088
84090
84091
Disp Disp Bin
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
3.5 3.1 to 3.5
5.3 5.1 to 6.0
1.9 1.6 to 2.0
5.8 5.1 to 6.0
5.4 5.1 to 6.0
2.5 2.1 to 2.5
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
1.5 0 to 1.6
2.5 2.1 to 2.5
3 2. 6 to 3.0
2 1.6 to 2.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
4.3 4.1 to 5.0
4 3. 5 to 4.0
3.3 3.1 to 3.5
1.9 1.6 to 2.0
3.5 3.1 to 3.5
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
1.9 1.6 to 2.0
3 2.6 to 3.0
2.5 2.1 to 2.5
3.3 3.1 to 3.5
3 2. 6 to 3.0
3.3 3.1 to 3.5
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
4.3 4.1 to 5.0
4.3 4.1 to 5.0
2.6 2.6 to 3.0
4.9 4.1 to 5.0
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
2 1.6 to 2.0
3 2. 6 to 3.0
3 2.6 to 3.0
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
3.1 3.1 to 3.5
3.5 3.1 to 3.5
2 1.6 to 2.0
3.1 3.1 to 3.5
4.6 4.1 to 5.0
4.9 4.1 to 5.0
Model
Make Model Year
Chevrolet
Isuzu
CMC
Ford
Ford
Ford
Dodge
Honda
Honda
Mazda
Dodge
Honda
Chevrolet
Oldsmobile
CMC
Jeep
Nissan
GM
Chrysler
Buick
Chevrolet
Buick
GM -Saturn
Mercury
Jeep
Dodge
Toyota
Dodge
GM
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Nissan
Ford
Honda
Honda
Honda
Ford
Ford
Honda
Chevrolet
Honda
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Ford
Cadillac
Cavalier
Trooper
Yukon XL
Escort LX
F-250
F-150XLT
Spirit
Civic
Civic
626
Caravan SE
Civic SI
Corsica
Cutlass Ciera
Jimmy
Cherokee Sport
Frontier
Saturn
300
LeSabre
Cavalier
LeSabre
Saturn
Villager LS
Wrangler
Caravan
Solara SLE
Grand Caravan Spo
Pontiac Grand Am
S-10
Blazer
Pickup
Mustang
Civic EX
Accord
Accord LX
Taurus
Taurus SES
Accord EX
Malibu LS
Odyssey
Tiburon
Lumina
Mustang
Seville
2001
1999
2001
1995
1979
2001
1990
1996
1991
2001
1989
2002
1996
1988
1995
1998
2002
2001
1999
1998
1990
1998
1996
1994
1995
1995
2001
1997
1989
2003
1995
1987
1968
1999
1997
1989
1988
2003
2000
1998
2004
2000
1998
1999
1991
Missing Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
data Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
Avg exhaust temp is high (450F)
Avg exhaust temp is low (250C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (480C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (450C)
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.06%
Average exhaust flow is > 2x average for all other similar displacement vehicles,
avg exhaust temp is high (525C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (480C)
Avg exhaust temp is low (21OC)
-------
Run#
84092
84093
84094
84096
84097
84099
84101
84102
84103
84104
84105
84107
84108
84109
84110
84111
84113
84114
84115
84116
84119
84120
84121
84122
84123
84125
84126
84127
84128
84129
84131
84132
84133
84134
84135
84137
84138
84139
84140
84141
84143
84144
84145
84146
84148
84149
84150
84151
84153
Disp
1.9
1.6
4
3.2
3
3
3
3
1.6
3
3.3
1.8
3.8
1.5
3.3
2
4.3
3.1
3
2
4.3
4
1.5
2.9
3.3
1.5
4
3.8
3.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
4
3.1
4.6
2.5
4
5.8
2
4.3
2.2
3
3
4
2.3
3.3
2
3.5
2.3
4.2
Disp Bin
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
3. 5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
2. 6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
3. 5 to 4.0
0 to 1.6
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
3. 5 to 4.0
0 to 1.6
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
0 to 1.6
3. 5 to 4.0
3. 5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3. 5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3. 5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3. 5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
Model
Make Model Year
Saturn
Nissan
Ford
Isuzu
Mercury
Ford
Toyota
Toyota
Honda
Nissan
Plymouth
Toyota
Buick
Honda
Plymouth
Ford
Chevy
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Chevy
Jeep
Honda
Volvo
Dodge
Honda
Ford
Ford
Chrysler
Toyota
Toyota
Chevrolet
Jeep
Buick
Mercury
Ford
Jeep
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Honda
Ford
Plymouth
Jeep
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Honda
Honda
Ford
SL1
Sentra GXE
Explorer
Rodeo SL
Sable LS
Ranger
Avalon
Camry
Civic
Maxima
Voyager
Corolla
LeSabre
Civic DX
Voyager
Contour
S-10
Grand Prix
Taurus
Contour
S-10
Grand Cherokee
Civic
S80
Grand Caravan SE
Civic
Explorer XLT
Thunderbird
Town & Country
Camry LE
Celica
Cavalier
Cherokee Sport
Century Limited
Grand Marguis GS
Probe
Cherokee Sport
Bronco
Escort ZX2
Blazer LS
Accord
Taurus
Voyager
Cherokee
Ranger XLT
Dynasty
Escort
Odyssey
Accord
F150
1999
1997
1993
1999
2002
1999
1999
1994
1999
2000
1998
1997
1989
1991
1998
1995
1996
1993
1988
1995
1996
1995
1984
2001
1999
1984
1995
1988
2000
2000
1999
1997
1993
1998
1997
1993
1993
1995
1999
2002
1990
1988
1993
1990
1988
1988
2002
2000
2000
2000
Missing
data
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Flow
Flag
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 8.77
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
No flowmeter exhaust or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
File is missing or contains invalid test data
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter data.
File is missing or contains invalid test data
No flowmeter mass flow rate data. Avg dilution = 10.8%
File is missing or contains invalid test data
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% less than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 8.45%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles. Avg exhaust temp is low (100C)
No flowmeter mass flow rate data.
Avg exhaust temp is low (250C)
-------
Run# Disp Disp Bin
84154
84156
84157
84160
84161
84162
84164
84165
84166
84167
84168
84169
84171
84172
84173
84174
84175
84177
84178
84179
84180
84182
84183
84184
84185
84187
84188
84189
84191
84192
84193
84195
84196
84197
84198
84200
84201
84205
84206
84208
84209
84210
84211
84213
84214
84215
84218
84219
84220
Make
Model
Model Missing
Year data
4.9 4.1 to 5.0
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
2 1.6 to 2.0
2.4 2.1 to 2.5
2.6 2.6 to 3.0
3.3 3.1 to 3.5
1.8 1.6 to 2.0
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
3 2. 6 to 3.0
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
1.5 0 to 1.6
2.8 2. 6 to 3.0
3 2.6 to 3.0
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
3 2.6 to 3.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
4 3. 5 to 4.0
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
4.6 4.1 to 5.0
1.8 1.6 to 2.0
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
1.8 1.6 to 2.0
3 2.6 to 3.0
5 4.1 to 5.0
4.9 4.1 to 5.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
4.3 4.1 to 5.0
2.4 2.1 to 2.5
3.1 3.1 to 3.5
4.3 4.1 to 5.0
3.1 3.1 to 3.5
1.9 1.6 to 2.0
1.9 1.6 to 2.0
2.8 2. 6 to 3.0
4.2 4.1 to 5.0
5.7 5.1 to 6.0
5 4.1 to 5.0
2.4 2.1 to 2.5
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
3 2.6 to 3.0
3 2. 6 to 3.0
3.5 3.1 to 3.5
1.9 1.6 to 2.0
Ford
Honda
Nissan
Ford
Volvo
Chrysler
Plymouth
Mazda
Mercury
Ford
Buick
Mercury
Honda
Cadillac
Mercury
Mercury
Pontiac
Ford
Toyota
Jeep
Pontiac
Ford
Toyota
Honda
Toyota
Ford
Chevy
Ford
Toyota
CMC
Hyundai
Chevy
CMC
Buick
Saturn
Saturn
Chevy
Ford
Chevrolet
Lincoln
Dodge
Mazda
Ford
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Nissan
Ford
Chrysler
Ford
F150
Accord
Sentra
Focus SE
850
Le Baron
Voyager
Protege
Topaz GS
Ranger
Regal
Topaz GS
Civic DX
Cimmaron
Sable
Topaz
Bonneville
Taurus
Camry
Cherokee
Bonneville
Thunderbird LX
Corolla
Civic
Corolla
Taurus
Monte Carlo
F150
Camry
Sonoma SLS
Santa Fe
Lumina
Safari
Regal
SL1
SL1
S-10 Truck
F1 50 Truck
C1500
Towncar
Stratus ES
MX-6
Tempo
Ninety Eight Regenc
Bonneville
Maxima
Taurus
Concord
Escort
1979
2000
1994
2001
1997
1983
1999
1991
1994
1999
1996
1994
1988
1986
1996
1994
1988
1988
1997
1998
1988
1995
2000
2000
1996
1988
1977
1984
2000
2001
2001
1999
1993
1990
1994
1994
1985
1998
1994
1989
1996
1988
1986
1985
1994
1992
1988
1994
1992
Flow
Flag
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, avg exhaust temp is high (500C)
File is missing or contains invalid test data
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
No flowmeter flow or temp data.
Average exhaust flow is > 2x average for all other similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.01%, avg exhaust temp is low (185C)
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp is low (280C)
Avg exhaust temp is low (200C)
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 2.24%
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
-------
Run#
84221
84223
84224
84225
84227
84228
84229
84230
84231
84233
84234
84235
84236
84238
84240
84241
84242
84244
84245
84246
84248
84250
84252
84253
84254
84256
84257
84258
84259
84261
84262
84263
84265
84266
84267
84268
84270
84271
84272
84274
84276
84277
84278
84279
84280
84281
84283
84284
Disp
5
3.8
3
1.6
3.1
2.3
3.4
1.3
3.8
1.6
1.8
1.6
2.3
2.8
3
2.5
3.3
1.8
2
1.8
2.9
1.9
3
3
3.8
4.3
2.3
3.8
3
2
3.8
2
3
1.8
2
5
5
4.9
3
1.3
3.8
1.8
4.3
3
2
5.7
3.7
5
Disp Bin
4.1 to 5.0
3. 5 to 4.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
0 to 1.6
3. 5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
3. 5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3. 5 to 4.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
3. 5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2. 6 to 3.0
0 to 1.6
3. 5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
5.1 to 6.0
3. 5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
Model
Make Model Year
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Honda
Buick
Pontiac
Oldsmobile
Nissan
Oldsmobile
Toyota
Volkswagen
Geo
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Infiniti
Ford
Plymouth
Ford
Honda
Eagle
Ford
Ford
Ford
Mercury
Buick
Chevy
Volvo
Oldsmobile
Ford
Toyota
Oldsmobile
Dodge
Buick
Kia
Chevy
Ford
Mercury
Buick
Honda
Ford
Buick
MG
CMC
Toyota
Ford
Chevy
Dodge
Chevrolet
Crown Victoria
Grand Caravan
Taurus
Civic
Century
Grand Am
Silhouette
Sentra
Eighty-Eight
Corolla
Cabriolet
Prism
Achieva
6000
ISO
Contour
Voyager
Escort
Accord
Talon
Ranger
Escort
Taurus
Sable
Regal
S-10
240 GL
Delta 88
Taurus
Camry
Delta 88
Ram 50
Century
Sephia
Cavalier
F150
Grand Marguis
LeSabre
Accord
Aspire
Electra Park Ave
MG
Jimmy
Camry
Escort
Suburban
Ram
aprice Classic Wago
1985
2005
2002
2000
1997
1992
2000
1993
1994
1989
1991
1990
1992
1988
1998
1998
1997
1993
1987
1994
1987
1987
2001
1997
1992
1989
1983
1991
1988
1989
1991
1989
1984
2000
1989
1994
1986
1979
2001
1995
1989
1978
1990
2001
1999
1995
1986
1987
Missing
data
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Flow
Flag
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 1.04%
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, max exhaust temp very high too (800C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (460C)
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, dilution suspect (CO+CO2 = 4.3%). Avg exhaust temp is
low(190C)
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.05%
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.35%
Average exhaust flow is > 2x average for all other similar displacement vehicles,
avg exhaust temp is high (480C)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 8.45%
Average exhaust flow is > 2x average for all other similar displacement vehicles.
Avg dilution = 10.4%
-------
Run#
84285
84286
84287
84289
84290
84291
84292
84293
84295
84296
84297
84298
84300
84301
84302
84303
84304
84305
84307
84308
84309
84310
84311
84312
84314
84315
84316
84317
84318
84319
84321
84322
84323
84324
84325
84327
84328
84329
84330
Disp Disp Bin
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
3.4 3.1 to 3.5
4.3 4.1 to 5.0
5 4.1 to 5.0
3 2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
5 4.1 to 5.0
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
2.4 2.1 to 2.5
5.9 5.1 to 6.0
3.8 3. 5 to 4.0
3.1 3.1 to 3.5
4.9 4.1 to 5.0
3.4 3.1 to 3.5
1.7 1.6 to 2.0
3.1 3.1 to 3.5
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
4.5 4.1 to 5.0
3.4 3.1 to 3.5
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
2.3 2.1 to 2.5
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
3 2. 6 to 3.0
2 1.6 to 2.0
2.4 2.1 to 2.5
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
3 2.6 to 3.0
2 1.6 to 2.0
1.6 1.6 to 2.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
3 2.6 to 3.0
3 2. 6 to 3.0
3 2.6 to 3.0
4 3. 5 to 4.0
2.2 2.1 to 2.5
Model
Make Model Year
Honda
Oldsmobile
CMC
Oldsmobile
Ford
Honda
Toyota
Volvo
Chevy
Honda
Dodge
Dodge
Buick
Pontiac
Ford
Oldsmobile
Honda
Chevrolet
Honda
Pontiac
Mercedes
Chevy
Toyota
Pontiac
Plymouth
Plymouth
Dodge
Nissan
Nissan
Toyota
Toyota
Toyota
Kia
Toyota
Nissan
Ford
Toyota
Jeep
Chevy
Civic
Silhouette
Sierra
>m Cruiser Station V\
Taurus
Civic
Camry
GL
Caprice
Civic
Stratus
Durango
LeSabre
Grand Prix
F150
Silhouette
Civic
Malibu
Accord
Grand Am
280 SE
Venture
Corolla
Grand Am
Sundance
Voyager
Avenger
Altima
Sentra
Camry
Avalon
Camry
Rio
Camry
Maxima
Taurus
Avalon
Wrangler
Cavalier
2000
1997
1995
1984
1988
1997
1997
1984
1987
1998
1996
1999
1990
1989
1993
2002
2001
1999
1992
1994
1973
2003
1989
1994
1989
1991
1996
2000
1997
1998
1996
1990
2004
1999
1997
1998
1996
1997
2004
Missing
data
X
X
Flow
Flag
Dilution
Flag
Exh Temp
Flag
Ambient
Temp Flag
Suspect
Data
Data Review Comments
Avg exhaust temp is high (51OC)
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles. Avg exhaust temp is low (530C)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 10.10%
Avg exhaust temp is high (480C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (470C)
Average exhaust flow is approx 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, avg exh temp is high (490C)
File is missing or contains invalid test data
File is missing or contains invalid test data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% more than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles
-------
Run#
84331
84332
84334
84335
84336
84337
84338
84339
84341
84342
84343
84344
84345
84347
84348
84349
84350
84351
84353
84354
84355
84356
84357
84359
84360
84361
84362
84363
84365
84366
84367
84368
84369
84370
84372
84373
84374
84375
84376
84377
84379
84380
84381
84382
84383
84384
84386
84387
Disp
2.4
2.4
5
5
2.4
4
2.4
3.8
2.4
3
3.5
3
3.1
1.6
3
2.5
3.1
2
1.9
4.9
3.1
2.4
1.9
1.6
3
3.5
3
1.8
3.8
3.3
4.5
1.9
2.3
3
3
4.3
3
3.8
3.5
2.2
2.4
4.6
4.6
2
2.2
1.6
3
3
Disp Bin
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3. 5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3. 5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
0 to 1.6
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
3. 5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3. 5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
0 to 1.6
2. 6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
Model
Make Model Year
Saturn
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Mercury
Toyota
Ford
Saturn
Plymouth
Pontiac
Toyota
Kia
Toyota
GM/Chevy
Toyota
Ford
Chevrolet
GM/Chevy
Ford
Saturn
Ford
Chevrolet
Pontiac
Mercury
Toyota
Ford
Nissan
Ford
Toyota
Ford
Oldsmobile
Mercedes
Saturn
Volvo
Ford
Toyota
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Honda
Honda
Pontiac
Lincoln
Mercury
Volkswagon
Toyota
GEO
Nissan
Ford
Sedan
Grand Am SE
Caprice-estate
Grand Marquis
Pickup
Ranger
Sedan
Voyager
Grand Am SE
Camry
Sedona
Sienna
Lumina
Corolla
Taurus
Tracker
Lumina
Contour
Wagon
F150
Lumina
Grand Am
Tracer
Corolla
Taurus
Maxima
Taurus SE
Corolla
Taurus
Cutlass Wagon
Sel
SL1
850 Turbo
Taurus
Camry
Astro
Taurus
Windstar
Odyssey
Accord
Grand Am GT
Continental
Marquis
Cabrio
Camry
Prism
Maxima
Taurus
2001
1997
1990
1988
1987
2003
2001
1999
1997
1994
2004
2000
1997
1995
1988
2003
1997
1996
1993
1989
2001
1997
1995
1992
1988
2002
1998
1996
1993
1989
1980
1997
1996
1995
1994
1990
1988
2001
2000
1997
1998
1995
1994
1999
1996
1996
1990
1988
Missing
data
Flow
Flag
Dilution
Flag
Exh Temp
Flag
Ambient
Temp Flag
Suspect
Data
Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% less than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 =
Avg exhaust temp is high (490C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (440C)
Missing delays, fuel SG, etc.
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.71°/i
Avg exhaust temp is high (490C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (490C)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 8.73%
Avg exhaust temp is low (190C)
Missing delays, fuel SG, etc.
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix P
Round 2 Dynamometer PEMS
Quality Control Summary
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Run* Disp
84393 3.5
84394 3.5
84396 1.9
84397 5.7
84398 2.3
84399 2.2
84401 3.3
84402 1.5
84403 3
84406 1.6
84407 2.3
84409 3.1
84411 1.9
84412 1.6
84413 5.7
84414 3.8
84415 5.9
84416 1.6
84419 3.1
84420 2.3
84421 2.2
84422 4
84424 4
84425 4
84426 1.9
84427 2.4
84428 3.1
84430 2.5
84431 5
84432 1.9
84433 4
84434 3.8
84436 4.3
84437 3
84438 3.1
84439 3.8
84442 3
84443 1.6
84444 2.5
84445 2.2
84446 3
84448 3.8
84449 3.1
84450 3.1
84451 3.1
84452 3
84453 3
84455 3.8
Disp Bin
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
Oto1.6
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
Make Model Model Year
Chrysler
Honda
Ford
Chevrolet
Honda
Honda
Plymouth
Honda
Dodge
Toyota
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Saturn
Honda
Ford
Chevrolet
Dodge
Honda
Chevrolet
Honda
Saturn
300M
Odyssey
Escort LX
Silverado
Accord
Accord
Voyager
Civic
Caravan
Corolla
Grand AM
Malibu
Civic
F250
Impala
Durango
Civic
Lumina
Accord
LS1
1999
2000
1995
1976
2001
1997
1998
1991
2000
1995
1989
1999
1996
1996
1979
2003
1999
1998
1998
2000
2000
Jeep Cherokee 1998
Ford
Jeep
Saturn
Mitsubishi
Chevy
Dodge
Mercury
Saturn
Jeep
Explorer
Grand Cherokee
SC2
Galant
Malibu
Spirit
Grand Marquis Stat
Sedan
Wrangler
1995
1995
2001
2001
1998
1990
1991
1999
1997
Chevrolet
Toyota
Buick
Pontiac
Toyota
Geo
Chevrolet
Saturn
Toyota
Plymouth
Buick
Ford
Buick
Ford
Nissan
Ford
S-10
Camry
Century
Bonneville
Camry
Prizm
Tracker
Sedan
Sienna
Voyager
Regal
Taurus
Regal
Taurus
Maxima
Mustang
1995
1994
2001
1995
1994
1991
2003
2001
2000
1999
1994
1988
1994
1995
1995
1995
Missing Flo
data Fla
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Average exh flow is approx 50% higher than other vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh
temp is low (120C)
Average exh flow is > 50% higher than other vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh temp is
low (240C)
Average exh flow is approx 50% higher than other vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh
temp is low (190C)
Average exh flow is > 50% higher than othe
Average exh flow is > 50% higher than othe
Average exh flow is > 50% higher than othe
vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh temp is
ow (230C)
vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh temp is
ow (220C)
vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh temp is
ow (220C)
Average exh flow is > 50% higher than othe
vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh temp is
ow (230C)
File is missing or contains invalid test data.
Average exh flow is > 50% higher than other vehicles with similar displacements, dilution suspect
(avg CO+CO2 = 10.3%)., avg exh temp is low (200C)
Suspect dilution (avg CO + CO2 = 5.19%)
Suspect dilution (avg CO + CO2 = 6.54%)
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 8.6%, avg exh temp is high (530C)
Avg exh temp is high (490C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (51OC)
Avg exhaust temp is high (51 OC)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 10.5%
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 7.6%, erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Avg exh temp is low (290C), erroenous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
-------
Run* Disp
84456 3.1
84457 4.6
84458 3
84459 3
84461 3
84462 3
84463 2
84464 3.3
84465 3.8
84467 2.3
84468 3.8
84469 3
84470 4.5
84472 5
84473 4
84474 1.5
84475 2.3
84477 4
84479 3.3
84480 3
84482 4.9
84483 2
84484 4.9
84485 4.9
84487 2.2
84488 3.8
84489 2.4
84490 4.9
84492 5
84493 4.2
84494 2.3
84495 2.2
84497 3
84498 3
84499 1.8
84500 2.4
84502 3.5
84503 3
84504 3.2
84505 3.3
84507 3
84508 1.5
84509 4.3
84510 5.7
84512 4.4
84514 3.5
84515 2.4
84517 3.3
84518 3.1
84519 3
84520 3
84521 2.2
84522 4.3
Disp Bin
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
Oto1.6
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
Oto1.6
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
Make Model Model Year
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Plymouth
Ford
Dodge
Chevy
Ford
Chevy
Dodge
Mercedes
Chevrolet
Ford
Honda
Ford
Dodge
Dodge
Ford
Buick
Dodge
Buick
Cadillac
Mazda
Buick
Toyota
Cadillac
Chevy
Ford
Ford
GMC
Toyota
Toyota
Acura
Nissan
Chrysler
Ford
Chrysler
Dodge
Ford
Honda
Chevrolet
Chevy
Chevy
Chrysler
Dodge
Dodge
Buick
Dodge
Ford
Honda
Chevy
Grand Prix Le
Crown Victoria
Aerostar
Aerostar
Taurus
Voyager
Contour
Intrepid
Lumina LS
Ranger
Lumina LS
Caravan
280 SE
Monte Carlo
Explorer
Civic
Tempo
Ram
Caravan
Taurus
Lasabre
Neon
Lasabre
Fleetwood
B2200
Lesabre
Truck
Fleetwood
C10 Silverado
Freestar SEL
Ranger XLT
Sonoma
4RunnerSR5
Sienna XLE
Integra
Frontier
Concord
Taurus
Concord LXI
Intrepid
Taurus
Civic
Astrovan
Suburban
Caprice
Concorde
Stratus
Grand Caravan
Skylark
Caravan
Taurus
Accord
C1500
1993
1995
1993
1992
1988
1989
1995
1994
1994
1988
1994
1989
1973
1977
1996
1988
1986
1989
1996
1988
1979
1996
1979
1991
1992
1995
1987
1991
1984
2004
1997
1996
1995
2001
1995
1998
1996
2002
2000
1993
1988
1992
1992
1994
1982
2002
1999
1998
1994
1992
2001
1997
1996
Missing
data
X
Flow
Flag
Dilution
Flag
Exh Temp
Flag
x
Ambient
Temp Flag
Suspect
Data
x
Data Review Comments
Avg exhaust temp is high (550C), erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Average exh flow is approx 50% higher than other vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh
temp is high (560C)
Avg exh temp is high (51OC)
Avg exhaust temp is high (470C)
Avg exh temp is low (290C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (470C)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.7%, avg exh temp is high (470C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (515C)
File is missing or contains invalid test data.
Avg exh temp is low (230C)
Avg exh temp is low (270C)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
-------
Run#
84524
84526
84527
84528
84529
84531
84532
84533
84534
84536
84537
84538
84539
84541
84542
84543
84544
84546
84547
84548
84550
84551
84552
84554
84556
84557
84558
84560
84561
84562
84563
84564
84566
84567
84568
84569
84570
84572
84573
84574
84575
84577
84578
84580
84581
84582
84584
84587
84588
84589
84591
84592
84593
84595
Dlsp Dlsp Bin
2.3 2.1 to 2.5"
4.1 to 5.0"
5.1 to 6.0"
4.1 to 5.0"
2.1 to 2.5"
1.6 to 2.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
5.1 to 6.0"
2.1 to 2.5"
2.6 to 3.0"
3.5 to 4.0"
3.5 to 4.0"
5.1 to 6.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
3.1 to 3.5"
3.5 to 4.0"
2.6 to 3.0"
3.5 to 4.0"
1.6 to 2.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
4.1 to 5.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
3.1 to 3.5"
4.1 to 5.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
3.5 to 4.0"
4.1 to 5.0"
2.1 to 2.5"
4.1 to 5.0"
3.5 to 4.0"
3.5 to 4.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
2.1 to 2.5"
4.1 to 5.0"
2.1 to 2.5"
2.6 to 3.0"
2.1 to 2.5"
2.1 to 2.5"
3.5 to 4.0"
3.5 to 4.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
3.5 to 4.0"
2.6 to 3.0"
3.5 to 4.0"
3.1 to 3.5"
2.6 to 3.0"
2.1 to 2.5"
2.6 to 3.0"
5.1 to 6.0"
1.6 to 2.0"
2.6 to 3.0"
5.1 to 6.0"
2.1 to 2.5"
1.6 to 2.0"
4.6
5.9
4.6
2.5
1.6
3.4
5.7
2.2
3
4
4
5.7
3.3
3.3
4
3
3.9
1.8
3.3
5
3.5
3.4
4.9
3.3
3.8
4.3
2.5
5
3.7
4
3.3
2.2
4.9
2.3
3
2.2
2.3
3.8
3.8
3.1
3.8
3
3.8
3.1
2.7
2.4
3
5.7
1.9
3
5.7
2.3
2
Make Model Model Year
Isuzu
Lincoln
Dodge
Mercury
Plymouth
Geo
Pontiac
Chevy
Subaru
Ford
Jeep
Ford
Chevy
Dodge
Dodge
Jeep
Ford
Dodge
Toyota
Dodge
Lincoln
Isuzu
Olds
Ford
Chrysler
Buick
Chevy
Dodge
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Dodge
Honda
Cadillac
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Mercury
Buick
Ford
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Chrysler
Chevy
BMW
Nissan
Mercury
Buick
Saturn
Toyota
Ford
Honda
Ford
Pickup
Towncar
Ram PU
Grand Marquis
Sundance
Tracker
Montana
Suburban
Legacy Wagon
Taurus
Cherokee Sport
Ranger
Tahoe
Grand Caravan
Grand Caravan
Cherokee Sport
Taurus
Dakota
Corolla
Intrepid
Town Car
Axiom
Silhoutte
F150
Town & Country LX
Park Avenue
S-10
Dakota
Country Squire
Dakota
Ranger
Grand Caravan
Odyssey
Sedan Deville
Ranger
Taurus
S-10 Pick up
Topaz
Park Avenue
Taurus
Lumina
Windstar
Taurus
Town & Country
Corsica
528e
Pickup XE
Villager
Lesabre
SL2
4 Runner
LTD
Accord EX
Escort SE
1995
1991
1995
1994
1992
1992
2003
1999
1993
1988
2000
1998
1996
1996
1996
2000
1988
1999
1995
1995
1988
2002
2002
1992
2001
2000
2001
1998
1986
2004
2002
1998
1995
1992
1996
1995
1994
1994
1993
1993
1994
1998
1988
2002
1995
1988
1995
1997
1978
2001
1993
1979
1998
1998
Missing
data
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Avg exhaust temp is high (450C)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 10.7%, erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.0%, avg exh temp is low (290C)
No appreciable measured exhaust flow
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Avg exhaust temp is high (480C)
-------
Run* Disp
84596 3
84597 2
84599 3
84600 4
84601 3.8
84603 1.4
84605 2.8
84606 3
84608 3
84609 5
84611 2.5
84612 4
84616 3.3
84617 5.7
84618 2.5
84620 2.3
84621 3
84622 2.2
84623 2.5
84624 3
84626 3.7
84627 4.9
84628 4.2
84629 2.5
84630 2
84632 4.9
84633 2.7
84634 3
84635 5
84637 5
84638 3.8
84639 2.2
84640 4
84642 2.5
84643 1.9
84644 3.5
84645 2.9
84646 2
84648 3.9
84649 4.3
84650 3.1
84651 3
84653 5.7
84654 3.3
84655 3.8
84656 3.1
84658 4.3
84659 2.5
84660 3
84661 3.3
84662 4.5
84663 2
84665 3
84666 5
Disp Bin
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
3. 5 to 4.0
3. 5 to 4.0
0 to 1.6
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
5.1 to 6.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
Make Model Model Year
Ford
Pontiac
Toyota
Ford
Buick
Datsun
Datsun
Ford
Nissan
Buick
Toyota
Ford
Plymouth
Chevy
Plymouth
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Plymouth
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Chevy
Acura
Honda
Ford
Volvo
Plymouth
Ford
Oldsmobile
Chrysler
Chevy
Ford
Dodge
Ford
Nissan
Volvo
Honda
Dodge
GMC
Chevy
Ford
Chevrolet
Oldsmobile
Buick
Chevy
Chevy
Chrysler
Dodge
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Toyota
Ford
Taurus GL
Sunbird
Avalon
Explorer
Regal
210 Wagon
280Z
Taurus
Quest
Regal
Camry
Ranger XLT
Voyager
Suburban
Voyager
Ranger XLT
Ranger
Camry
Acclaim
Taurus
Ram Pickup
F-150
Trail Blazer
2.5 TL
Accord SEi
F-150
740 Turbo
Voyager SE
Crown Victoria LTD
Cutlass
Town & Country
Cavalier
Explorer
Spirit
Escort
Pathfinder
960
Accord LXI
SE Dakota
Sonoma
Lumina APV
Taurus
C20 Pickup
Cutlass
Park Avenue Electr
Lumina
Astrovan
LeBaron
Caravan SE
Century
Eldorado
Corsica
Pickup
F-150
1997
1994
1998
1993
1979
1979
1977
1988
1996
1978
1989
2000
1999
1997
1992
1992
1992
1999
1989
1988
1987
1987
2002
1996
1989
1987
1987
1988
1989
Supreme
1996
1995
1994
1989
1987
2001
1993
1988
1987
1995
1990
1988
1977
1990
1990
1990
1989
1988
1988
1990
1990
1989
1989
1988
Missing
data
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Avg exhaust temp is high (450C), suspect dilution, avg CO + CO2 =
Avg exhaust temp is high (611C)
No appreciable measured exhaust flow
Avg exh temp is low (260C)
Avg exhaust temp is low (220C)
Avg exhaust temp is low (250C)
Avg exhaust temp is low (220C)
Avg exhaust temp is low (220C)
Avg exh temp is high (520C)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 10.4%
Avg exh temp is high (500C)
Avg exhaust temp is high (470C)
-------
Run* Disp
84667 5.8
84668 3.8
84669 2.5
84670 2.3
84672 1.6
84673 5
84674 6.6
84675 2.3
84676 5
84677 3.8
84679 2.2
84680 5
84681 2.3
84681 5
84682 2.5
84683 2.9
84685 4.9
84686 4.9
84687 5.7
84688 3
84689 4.3
84690 2.8
84692 2.8
84693 4.9
84694 4.1
84695 2.8
84696 2.4
84697 3
84699 5
84700 6.5
84701 4.9
84702 5.7
84703 2.8
84705 3.8
84706 4.1
84707 5.7
84708 3.8
84709 2.3
84710 5
84712 4.1
84713 4.3
84714 1.9
84715 2.2
84717 2.4
84719 3.1
84720 5
84722 3.8
84723 2.2
84724 3.3
84726 3
84727 3.3
84728 3
84729 2.2
Disp Bin
5.1 to 6.0
3. 5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
>6.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
>6.0
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
Make Model Model Year
Ford
Oldsmobile
Dodge
Mercury
Toyota
CMC
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Buick
Toyota
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevy
Ford
GMC
Oldsmobile
Buick
Ford
Chevrolet
Oldsmobile
Toyota
Ford
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Chevy
Chevy
Chevy
Chevrolet
Chevy
Dodge
Ford
Chevy
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Saturn
Mazda
Ford
Oldsmobile
Chevy
Ford
Chevy
Oldsmobile
Ford
Ford
Ford
Toyota
F250 Pickup
Delta 88
Spirit
Topaz
Tercel SR5
Vandura
Firebird
Tempo
Bronco
Park Avenue
Pickup
Cheyenne Pickup
Tempo
Tempo
Camry
Ranger
F-150
F-150
El Camino
Taurus
Jimmy
Cutlass
Century
F-150
C-10
Cutlass
Pickup 4x4 Turbo
Taurus
Caprice
F-150
F-150
G20Van
Blazer 4x4
Malibu
Nova
Impala
Caravan ES
Ranger XLT
Monte Carlo
Nova
Blazer
Station Wagon
B2200
Mustang
Cutlass
Silverado 1500
Windstar
Cavalier
Cutlass Cierra
Aerostar
Granada
Escape
Camry
1982
1991
1990
1989
1983
1983
1979
1993
1990
1989
1983
1973
1993
1993
1990
1990
1988
1986
1976
1993
1992
1989
1988
1988
1983
1989
1987
1988
1985
1978
1990
1989
1987
1980
1976
1973
2003
1989
1984
1976
1996
1994
1988
1979
1990
1989
1998
1991
1990
1990
1982
2002
2001
Missing
data
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Suspect dilution (avg CO + CO2 = 9.83%)
Average exh flow is > 50% higher than other vehicles with similar displacements, avg exh temp is
X high (630C)
X X
X
X
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.85%, avg exh temp is high 490C)
Avg exh temp is high (490C)
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.39%
X X
X
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.0%
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 6.5%, avg exh temp is low (190C)
Avg exh temp is high (560C)
Avg exh temp is low (290C)
Suspect diltion : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.6%, avg exh temp is high (550C)
-------
Run* Disp
84730 4.3
84732 4.2
84733 3.1
84734 3
84735 2
84737 2.5
84738 5.7
84739 1.5
84740 3.8
84741 3
84743 1.6
84745 1.5
84747 3.3
84748 3.3
84749 3
84751 2
84752 4.9
84753 3.3
84754 3.3
84755 3.5
84757 4
84758 5.7
84759 2
84760 3
84761 3.5
84763 3.5
84765 4.3
84766 3.3
84767 2.4
84768 4.9
84770 4.9
84771 4.3
84772 3.3
84773 3.4
84774 3
84775 5.7
84777 5
Disp Bin
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
5.1 to 6.0
Oto1.6
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
Oto1.6
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
4.1 to 5.0
Make Model Model Year
Chevrolet
Jeep
Buick
Plymouth
Honda
Chevrolet
Pontiac
Mazda
Buick
Ford
Mazda
Honda
Dodge
Dodge
Toyota
Ford
Ford
Dodge
Plymouth
Honda
Jeep
Chevy
Ford
Ford
Kia
Honda
Chev
Dodge
Nissan
Ford
Ford
Chev
Dodge
Toyota
Dodge
Chevrolet
Oldsmobile
S-10LS
CJ-7
Skylark
Voyager
Accord
Celebrity
Grand Prix
Protege
LeSabre
Taurus
Protege
Civic
Grand Caravan
Grand Caravan
Sienna LE
Escort
F 100 Ranger
Grand Caravan
Voyager
Odyssey
Cherokee 4x4
Beauville 10
Focus
Escape
Sedona
Odyssey
Impala
Grand Caravan Spc
Frontier
F-150XL
F-250
Astro Van
Caravan SE
Forerunner
Caravan
Suburban
Cutlass Supreme
1995
1979
1998
1993
1988
1984
1976
1998
1990
1988
1999
1990
2003
2002
2001
1998
1978
2003
2003
2002
2001
1979
2005
2005
2004
2003
1985
2000
1998
1995
1995
1994
1992
1998
1995
1997
1987
Missing
data
X
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
File is missing or contains invalid test data.
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 5.99%
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 9.7%
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 = 10.5%
Suspect dilution : Avg CO + CO2 =10.8 %
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix Q
Round 1 Conditioning Run
Quality Control
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
CTR
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
_TST_ID
_002_1
_003_1
_004_1
_004_2
_005_1
_006_1
_007_1
_009_1
_010_1
_011_1
_013_1
_017_1
_018_1
_020_1
_021_1
_022_1
_023_1
_024_1
_024_2
_025_1
_026_1
_027_1
_028_1
_028_2
_028_3
_030_1
_032_1
_033_1
Disp
2.3
5.2
3.5
3.5
5.3
1.9
5.7
2.2
2.5
5.4
1.6
2.5
3
2.2
2
4.2
3.8
4
4
2.2
3.5
1.9
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.3
1.9
3.3
Disp Bin
2.1 to 2.5
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
5.1 to 6.0
0 to 1.6
2.1 to 2.5
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
Make
FORD
DODGE
ISUZU
ISUZU
CMC
FORD
FORD
TOYOTA
DODGE
FORD
HONDA
MAZDA
DODGE
Model
F150
RAM250
TROOPER
TROOPER
YUKON XL
ESCORT LX
F-250
RAV4
SPIRIT
F-1 50 XLT
CIVIC
626
CARAVAN SE
CHEVROLET CORSICA
HONDA
CMC
CIVIC SI
JIMMY
OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS CIER;
JEEP
JEEP
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
CMC
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
NISSAN
SATURN
DODGE
CHEROKEE SPC
CHEROKEE SPC
CAVALIER
300
SATURN
LESABRE
LESABRE
LESABRE
FRONTIER
SATURN
CARAVAN
Model Year
1979
1994
1999
1999
2001
1995
1979
2000
1990
2001
1996
2001
1989
1996
2002
1995
1988
1998
1998
1990
1999
2001
1998
1998
1998
2002
1996
1995
Test Date
8/9/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/14/2004
7/1 4/2004
7/1 4/2004
7/1 5/2004
7/1 5/2004
7/1 6/2004
7/1 7/2004
7/1 7/2004
7/1 9/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/21/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
Missing
data
X
X
X
X
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
2.5 2.1 to 2.5 MERCURY VILLAGER LS
1994 7/21/2004
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
_036_1
_037_1
_040_1
_041_1
_043_1
_044_1
_049_1
_050_1
_051_1
_052_1
_056_1
_056_2
_057_1
_057_2
_058_1
2.5
2.3
3
3.3
4.3
4.3
5
1.6
2.2
2
2.2
2.2
3
3
3.1
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
0 to 1.6
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2. 6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
JEEP
CMC
TOYOTA
DODGE
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
LINCOLN
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
WRANGLER
PONTIAC GRAN
SOLARA SLE
GRAND CARAV/
BLAZER
S-10
TOWNCAR
CIVIC EX
ACCORD
ACCORD LX
ACCORD EX
ACCORD EX
TAURUS SES
TAURUS SES
MALIBU LS
1995
1989
2001
1997
1995
2003
1990
1999
1997
1989
2000
2000
2003
2003
1998
7/21/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/26/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
X
X
X
Data Review Comments
Test record has missing or invalid da'
Test record has missing or invalid dats
Average exhaust temp (440C) is 30 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (21OC) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust temp (340C) is 30% higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid dats
Avg exhaust temp (21 OC) is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid dats
Average exhaust temp (380C) is 45% higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust temp (360C) is 25 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust temp (490C) is 70 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO+ CO2 = 9.15%, & avg exhaust temp (530C) is
70 % higher than similar displacement vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is approx 50% higher than average for all other
similar displacement vehicles, Average exhaust temp (420C) is 60%
higher than similar displacement vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid data
Test record has missing or invalid data
-------
CTR_TST_ID Disp Disp Bin Make
Model
Missing
Model Year Test Date data
C_KS1_061_1
C_KS1_062_1
C_KS1_063_1
C_KS1_064_1
C_KS1_065_1
C_KS1_066_1
C_KS1_067_1
C_KS1_067_2
C_KS1_068_1
C_KS1_069_1
C_KS1_071_1
C_KS1_072_1
C_KS1_073_1
C_KS1_074_1
C_KS1_075_1
C_KS1_076_1
C_KS1_076_2
C_KS1_077_1
C_KS1_078_1
C_KS1_078_2
C_KS1_080_1
C_KS1_081_1
C_KS1_082_1
C_KS1_083_1
C_KS1_085_1
C_KS1_086_1
C_KS1_088_1
C_KS1_090_1
C_KS1_092_1
C_KS1_093_1
C_KS1_094_1
C_KS1_094_2
C_KS1_095_1
C_KS1_096_1
C_KS1_097_1
C_KS1_098_1
C_KS1_099_1
C_KS1_100_1
C_KS1_1012_1
C_KS1_102_1
C_KS1_103_1
3.5
3.5
3.1
4.6
2
4.9
1.9
1.9
4
3.2
2
1.6
3
3
2.2
1.5
1.5
3
1.5
1.5
4
5.2
1.6
3
5
2
4.3
3.1
4
5.3
3.3
3.3
3.8
2.2
3.8
4
2.9
1.8
3
3.3
3.3
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
0 to 1.6
0 to 1.6
2. 6 to 3.0
0 to 1.6
0 to 1.6
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
0 to 1.6
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
HONDA
NISSAN
CHEVROLET
FORD
HYUNDAI
CADILLAC
SATURN
SATURN
FORD
ISUZU
TOYOTA
NISSAN
FORD
MERCURY
TOYOTA
HONDA
HONDA
TOYOTA
HONDA
HONDA
JEEP
DODGE
TOYOTA
NISSAN
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
PONTIAC
FORD
CHEVROLET
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
BUICK
SUBARU
FORD
FORD
VOLVO
MAZDA
NISSAN
DODGE
CHRYSLER
ODYSSEY
PATHFINDER LE
LUMINA
MUSTANG
TIBURON
SEVILLE
SL1
SL1
EXPLORER
RODEO SL
RAV4
SENTRA GXE
RANGER
SABLE LS
CAMRY
CIVIC
CIVIC
AVALON
CIVIC DX
CIVIC DX
GRAND CHERO
RAM LE
COROLLA
MAXIMA
F-150
CONTOUR
S-10
GRAND PRIX
EXPLORER
SILVERADO
VOYAGER
VOYAGER
LESABRE
OUTBACK LEG/
THUNDERBIRD
EXPLORER XLT
S80
PROTEGE
MAXIMA
GRAND CARAV/
TOWN & COUNT
2004
2003
1998
1999
2000
1991
1999
1999
1993
1999
2000
1997
1999
2002
1994
1984
1984
1999
1991
1991
1995
1991
1997
2000
1995
1995
1996
1993
2000
2002
1998
1998
1989
1996
1988
1995
2001
1991
1992
1999
2000
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
8/3/2004
7/29/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
8/3/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/29/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/11/2004
8/24/2004
8/3/2004
8/4/2004
x
x
X
X
X
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data Data Review Comments
Average exhaust temp (420C) is 30 % higher than similar displacement
X vehicles
X Test record has missing or invalid data
Avg exhaust temp (21OC) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust temp (410C)is 30 % higher than similar displacement
x x
x
2.2 2.1 to 2.5 TOYOTA
CELICA
1999
8/4/2004
x x
Average exhaust temp f 340C) is 30 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust temp (360C) is 30 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles,
Test record has missing or invalid data
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (450C) is 40 % higher than
similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.60%
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.35%
Average exhaust temp (410C)is 30 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid dats
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 5.75%
Average exhaust temp (450C) is 40 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust temp (380C) is 40 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles,
Avg exhaust temp ( 180C) is 30% lower than similar displacement
vehicles
No exhaust flow recorded.
Both min and max exhaust flows are way out of range, average is in
range, average ambient temp value is erroneous (228C)
-------
CTR_TST_ID Disp Disp Bin Make
C_KS1_105_1 4 3.5 to 4.0 JEEP
C_KS1_105_2 4 3.5 to 4.0 JEEP
C KS1 107 1 2.2 2.1 to 2.5 TOYOTA
C KS1 108 1
C KS1 138 1
C KS1 159 1
C_KS1_160_1
C KS1 164 1
Model Model Year
CHEROKEE SPC 1993
CHEROKEE SPC 1993
CAMRY LE 2000
2.2 2.1 to 2.5 CHEVROLET CAVALIER
1997
Missing
Test Date data
8/6/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
2.6 2.6 to 3.0 CHRYSLER LEBARON
1983 8/10/2004
C_KS1_139_1
C_KS1_140_1
C_KS1_140_2
C_KS1_141_1
C_KS1_142_1
C_KS1_147_1
C_KS1_148_1
C_KS1_149_1
C_KS1_150_1
C_KS1_151_1
C_KS1_152_1
C_KS1_153_1
C_KS1_154_1
2.4
2.3
2.3
2
3.3
1.5
3.8
2.8
3
3.8
2.3
3
4
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
0 to 1.6
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2. 6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
VOLVO
MERCURY
MERCURY
FORD
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
BUICK
CADILLAC
FORD
PONTIAC
MERCURY
MERCURY
JEEP
850
TOPAZ GS
TOPAZ GS
FOCUS SE
VOYAGER
CIVIC DX
REGAL
CIMMARON
RANGER
BONNEVILLE
TOPAZ
SABLE
CHEROKEE
1997
1994
1994
2001
1999
1988
1996
1986
1999
1988
1994
1996
1998
8/11/2004
8/13/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/1 4/2004
8/13/2004
8/1 3/2004
8/1 4/2004
4.6 4.1 to 5.0 FORD
THUNDERBIRD
1995 8/14/2004
2.2 2.1 to 2.5 TOYOTA CAMRY
1.8 1.6 to 2.0 TOYOTA COROLLA
1997
1996
8/14/2004
8/16/2004
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
C_KS1_109_1
C_KS1_110_1
C_KS1_110_2
C_KS1_112_1
C_KS1_113_1
C_KS1_114_1
C_KS1_116_1
C_KS1_117_1
C_KS1_118_1
C_KS1_120_1
C_KS1_121_1
C_KS1_123_1
C_KS1_124_1
C_KS1_126_1
C_KS1_127_1
C_KS1_128_1
C_KS1_129_1
C_KS1_132_1
C_KS1_133_1
C_KS1_134_1
C_KS1_134_2
4.6
3.1
3.1
2.5
5.8
2.7
2
4.3
4.3
2.2
3.3
4
2
3
3.5
2.3
4.2
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.6
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
5.1 to 6.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
MERCURY
BUICK
BUICK
FORD
FORD
CHRYSLER
FORD
CHEVROLET
LINCOLN
HONDA
DODGE
JEEP
FORD
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
HONDA
FORD
FORD
HONDA
NISSAN
NISSAN
GRAND MARQU
CENTURY LIMIT
CENTURY LIMIT
PROBE
BRONCO
CONCORD
ESCORT ZX2
BLAZER LS
TOWN CAR
ACCORD
DYNASTY
CHEROKEE
ESCORT
VOYAGER
ODYSSEY
ACCORD
F150
RANGER XLT
ACCORD LX
SENTRA
SENTRA
1997
1998
1998
1993
1995
2000
1999
2002
1987
1990
1988
1990
2002
1993
2000
2000
2000
1988
2001
1994
1994
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004 x
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/7/2004
8/7/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004 x
8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004
8/1 0/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
Avg exhaust temp (220C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.63%
Avg exhaust temp (200C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.62%
Test record has missing or invalid data
No exhaust flow recorded. & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 = 10.9%), &
X avg exhaust temp (190C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (61OC) is 120% higher than
X similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust temp (360C) is 30 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
X Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (140C) is 50% lower than
X similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (170C) is 40% lower than
X similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (21 OC) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
X Average ambient temp erroneous (-32C)
-------
CTR
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
_TST_ID
_165_1
_166_1
_167_1
_167_2
171 1
171 2
173 1
_175_1
178 1
179 1
_180_1
_180_2
181 1
182 1
187 1
188 1
_189_1
J93J
194 1
195 1
196 1
197 1
199 1
201 1
_203_1
_204_1
_207_1
_208_1
_210_1
_212_1
_212_2
213 1
215 1
219 1
221 1
_222_1
_223_1
_225_1
_226_1
_226_2
_228_1
Disp
1.6
2.2
1.8
1.8
2.5
2.5
5
2.4
2.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
3.1
3.1
4.3
5
2.8
5.8
5
4.2
4.2
5.7
2.4
2.2
3.8
5
3.8
4.9
3
3.5
3.5
3.8
5
1.6
3.1
2.3
3.8
1.6
1.3
1.3
3.4
Disp Bin
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
0 to 1.6
0 to 1.6
0 to 1.6
3.1 to 3.5
Make
HONDA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
SUBARU
SUBARU
CHEVROLET
HYUNDAI
CHEVROLET
CMC
CMC
CMC
SATURN
BUICK
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
LINCOLN
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
DODGE
MAZDA
Model
CIVIC
CAMRY
COROLLA
COROLLA
OUTBACK
OUTBACK
MONTE CARLO
SANTA FE
LUMINA
SAFARI
SONOMA SLS
SONOMA SLS
SL1
REGAL
ASTRO VAN
S-10 TRUCK
ECONOLINE
TOWNCAR
F1 50 TRUCK
WINDSTAR
C1500
STRATUS ES
MX-6
OLDSMOBILE NINETY EIGHT F
LINCOLN
PONTIAC
FORD
FORD
CHRYSLER
CHRYSLER
TOWNCAR
BONNEVILLE
F150
TAURUS
CONCORD
CONCORD
OLDSMOBILE EIGHTY-EIGHT
FORD
HONDA
BUICK
PONTIAC
DODGE
TOYOTA
NISSAN
NISSAN
CROWN VICTOF
CIVIC
CENTURY
GRAND AM
GRAND CARAV/
COROLLA
SENTRA
SENTRA
OLDSMOBILE SILHOUETTE
Missing
Model Year Test Date data
2000 8/16/2004
2000 8/18/2004
2000 8/16/2004
2000 8/16/2004 x
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
2000
2000
1977
2001
1999
1993
2001
2001
1994
1990
1991
1985
1983
1989
1998
1999
1994
1996
1988
1985
1987
1994
1990
2002
1994
1994
1994
1985
2000
1997
1992
2005
1989
1993
1993
2000
8/1 7/2004
8/1 7/2004
8/1 7/2004
8/1 8/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/25/2004
8/25/2004
8/26/2004
8/25/2004
8/25/2004
8/27/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
X
X
X
X
X
XXX
x x
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 = 10.6%), & avg
exhaust temp (450C) is 60 % higher than similar displacement vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust temp f 360C) is 25 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles, average ambient temp erroneous (-16C)
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust temp f 390C) is 30 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid data
average ambient temp erroneous (-29C)
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 = 4.15%)
Avg exhaust temp (140C)is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles
X Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 8.
X No exhaust flow recorded & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 = 8.91%)
X Avg exhaust temp (190C)is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles
X Avg exhaust temp (190C)is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles
X No exhaust flow recorded.
X Test record has missing or invalid data
-------
CTR
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
_TST_ID
_233_1
_233_2
_234_1
_235_1
_236_1
_236_2
_237_1
_239_1
_240_1
_241_1
_243_1
_244_1
_245_1
_246_1
_247_1
_248_1
_249_1
_250_1
_253_1
_254_1
_255_1
_259_1
_282_1
_290_1
_294_1
_297_1
_298_1
_299_1
_300_1
_301_1
_302_1
_304_1
_305_1
_306_1
_307_1
Disp
3
3
4.9
2.8
2.3
1.9
1.6
1.8
2.5
4.9
2
3
3.3
1.8
2.9
2.3
4.3
1.9
3.8
3
3
2.5
3.8
2.3
3
1.8
2
4.9
5
5
3.8
1.3
3.8
4
4.3
Disp Bin
2. 6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
0 to 1.6
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
0 to 1.6
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
Make
FORD
FORD
FORD
PONTIAC
Model
TAURUS
TAURUS
F1 50 4X2
6000
OLDSMOBILEACHIEVA
OLDSMOBILEACHIEVA
GEO
FORD
FORD
CADILLAC
HONDA
INFINITI
PLYMOUTH
EAGLE
FORD
VOLVO
CHEVROLET
FORD
BUICK
MERCURY
FORD
PLYMOUTH
PRISM
ESCORT
CONTOUR
SEDAN DE VILL
ACCORD
ISO
VOYAGER
TALON
RANGER
240 GL
S-10
ESCORT
REGAL
SABLE
TAURUS
ACCLAIM
OLDSMOBILE DELTA 88
DODGE
BUICK
KIA
RAM 50
CENTURY
SEPHIA
CHEVROLET CAVALIER
BUICK
FORD
MERCURY
BUICK
FORD
HONDA
JEEP
CMC
LESABRE
F150
GRAND MARQU
ELECTRA PARK
ASPIRE
ACCORD
GRAND CHERO
JIMMY
Model Year
1987
1987
1987
1988
1992
1992
1990
1993
1998
1993
1987
1998
1997
1994
1987
1983
1989
1987
1992
1997
2001
1990
1991
1989
1984
2000
1989
1979
1994
1986
1989
1995
2001
1995
1990
Missing Flow
Test Date data Flag
8/28/2004 x
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
X
8/28/2004
8/30/2004 x
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004 x
8/30/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004 x
9/1/2004
9/1/2004 x
9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/8/2004 x
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004 x
9/9/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/11/2004 x
9/1 0/2004
Dilut
Fla
x
x
X
X
X
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 =0.8%), & avg
exhaust temp (90 C) is 70% lower than similar displacement vehicles
X Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (160C) is 40% lower than
X similar displacement vehicles
X Avg exhaust temp (190C)is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.96%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
X displacement vehicles
Average exhaust temp (330C) is 30 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (160C)is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (230C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (530C) is 95 % higher than
similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.71%
Avg exhaust temp (220C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 = 9.9
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.02%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (530C) is 70 % higher than
X similar displacement vehicles
-------
CTR_TST_ID Disp Disp Bin Make
Model
Missing
Model Year Test Date data
Flow
Flag
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
C_KS1_308_1
C_KS1_309_1
C_KS1_312_1
C_KS1_314_1
C_KS1_316_1
C_KS1_317_1
C_KS1_318_1
C_KS1_319_1
C_KS1_321_1
C_KS1_322_1
C_KS1_323_1
C_KS1_324_1
C_KS1_325_1
C_KS1_326_1
C_KS1_327_1
C_KS1_328_1
C_KS1_329_1
C_KS1_329_2
C_KS1_330_1
C_KS1_331_1
C_KS1_332_1
C_KS1_333_1
C_KS1_335_1
C_KS1_336_1
C_KS1_337_1
C_KS1_338_1
C_KS1_339_1
C_KS1_341_1
C_KS1_343_1
C_KS1_344_1
C_KS1_346_1
C_KS1_347_1
C_KS1_348_1
C_KS1_349_1
C_KS1_350_1
C_KS1_350_2
C_KS1_351_1
C_KS1_352_1
C_KS1_354_1
C_KS1_355_1
C_KS1_356_1
1.8
3.4
1.6
4.3
1.6
5
2.3
5
5.9
4.9
3.1
3.8
2.4
2.5
5.9
1.6
1.7
1.7
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.4
4.5
5.7
4.6
3.4
3
2
1.6
3
2
2.4
2.3
3.8
3
3
3
2.2
3
4
1.6
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
2. 6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
MG
MG
OLDSMOBILE SILHOUETTE
HONDA
CMC
HONDA
CIVIC
SIERRA
CIVIC
OLDSMOBILE CUSTOM CRUI:
VOLVO
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
PONTIAC
BUICK
DODGE
TOYOTA
DODGE
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
HONDA
PONTIAC
CHEVROLET
GL
CAPRICE
RAM
F150
GRAND PRIX
LESABRE
STRATUS
CAMRY
DURANGO
CIVIC
CIVIC
CIVIC
ACCORD
GRAND AM
MALIBU
OLDSMOBILE SILHOUETTE
M.BENZ
CHEVROLET
FORD
280 SE
G-20
F150
CHEVROLET VENTURE
PLYMOUTH
DODGE
TOYOTA
NISSAN
TOYOTA
NISSAN
PLYMOUTH
FORD
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
NISSAN
TOYOTA
FORD
JEEP
KIA
VOYAGER
AVENGER
COROLLA
SENTRA
CAMRY
ALTIMA
SUNDANCE
WINDSTAR
AVALON
AVALON
MAXIMA
CAMRY
TAURUS
WRANGLER
RIO
1978
1997
2000
1995
1997
1984
1984
1987
1997
1993
1989
1990
1996
1997
1999
1998
2001
2001
1992
1994
1999
2002
1973
1993
1997
2003
1991
1996
1989
1997
1990
2000
1989
2001
1996
1996
1997
1999
1998
1997
2004
9/1 0/2004
9/1 4/2004
9/13/2004
9/1 4/2004
9/13/2004
9/1 4/2004
9/1 4/2004
9/1 4/2004
9/1 5/2004
9/1 5/2004
9/1 5/2004
9/1 5/2004
9/1 4/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/1 5/2004
9/1 6/2004
9/1 6/2004
9/1 6/2004
9/1 6/2004
9/1 6/2004
9/16/2004
9/20/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/1 8/2004
9/1 8/2004
9/1 8/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/29/2004
9/1 8/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (330C) is 30 % higher than
X similar displacement vehicles
X Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust temp (510C)is 70 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (460C) is 40 % higher than
similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.87%
Average exhaust flow is approx 50% higher than average for all other
similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust temp (490C) is 40 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust temp (390C) is 50 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust temp (390C) is 50 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust temp (440C) is 40 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO+ CO2 = 8.19%, & avg exhaust temp (250C) is
30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is approx 50% higher than average for all other
similar displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp (440C) is 50 % higher
than similar displacement vehicles
-------
Missing Flow
CTR_TST_ID Disp Disp Bin Make Model Model Year Test Date data Flag
C KS1 358 1 5 4.1 to 5.0 CHEVROLET CAPRICE-ESTA- 1990 9/21/2004
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.60%
C KS1 359 1
5 4.1 to 5.0 MERCURY GRAND MARQU
1988 9/21/2004
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
C_KS1
_360_1
_361_1
_363_1
_363_2
_364_1
_364_2
_367_1
_368_1
_369_1
_369_2
_372_1
_373_1
_373_2
_374_1
_377_1
_379_1
2.4
2.2
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
3.8
3
4
4
3.5
1.6
1.6
3
2.5
3.1
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
TOYOTA
PICKUP
CHEVROLET CAVALIER
PONTIAC
PONTIAC
SATURN
SATURN
PLYMOUTH
TOYOTA
FORD
FORD
KIA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
GRAND AM SE
GRAND AM SE
SEDAN
SEDAN
VOYAGER
CAMRY
RANGER
RANGER
SEDONA
COROLLA
COROLLA
SIENNA
OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS
CHEVROLET
LUMINA
1987
2004
1997
1997
2001
2001
1999
1994
2003
2003
2004
1995
1995
2000
1987
1997
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/24/2004
1.6 to 2.0 FORD
CONTOUR
1996 9/24/2004
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
_KS1
_KS1
_KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
_KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
_KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
_381_2
_383_1
_383_2
_384_1
_385_1
_386_1
_386_2
_387_1
_388_1
_389_1
_390_1
_394_1
_394_2
_395_1
_398_1
_399_1
_416_1
_417_1
_419_1
_420_1
_420_2
_421_1
_424_1
_424_2
2
4.9
4.9
1.9
2.5
5
5
2
3
3.7
5.7
1.6
1.6
2.4
1.9
3.1
3
1.8
3.5
4.5
4.5
3.8
4.3
4.3
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
FORD
FORD
FORD
SATURN
CONTOUR
F150
F150
WAGON
CHEVROLET TRACKER
CHEVROLET CAPRICE CLASi
CHEVROLET
FORD
TOYOTA
DODGE
CAPRICE CLASi
ESCORT
CAMRY
RAM
CHEVROLET SUBURBAN
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
PONTIAC
MERCURY
CHEVROLET
FORD
TOYOTA
NISSAN
M.BENZ
M.BENZ
FORD
COROLLA
COROLLA
GRAND AM
TRACER
LUMINA
TAURUS SE
COROLLA
MAXIMA
SEL
SEL
TAURUS
CHEVROLET ASTRO
CHEVROLET ASTRO
1996
1989
1989
1993
2003
1987
1987
1999
2001
1986
1995
1992
1992
1997
1995
2001
1998
1996
2002
1980
1980
1993
1990
1990
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 = 9.71%), & avg
X exhaust temp (230C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 =10.3 %, & avg exhaust temp (430C) is
25 % higher than similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (200C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (190C)is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
X Avg exhaust temp (190C)is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
X Avg exhaust temp (190C)is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.59%
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.27%
Suspect diltion: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.71%
Avg exhaust temp (200C) is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (21OC) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (220C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
-------
Missing
CTR
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
c_
_KS1
_KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
_KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
.KS1
_TST_ID
_425_1
_425_2
_426_1
_427_1
_428_1
_429_1
_429_2
_430_1
_432_1
_433_1
_434_1
_436_1
_437_1
_437_2
_438_1
_439_1
_440_1
441 1
_442_1
_443_1
_982_1
Disp
2.3
2.3
3
1.9
3
3.3
3.3
3.5
4.6
4.9
4.6
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.6
5
2.1
3
2
2.2
Disp Bin
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
0 to 1.6
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
Make
VOLVO
VOLVO
TOYOTA
SATURN
FORD
Model Model Year
850 TURBO
850 TURBO
CAMRY
SL1
TAURUS
OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS WAGC
OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS WAGC
HONDA
LINCOLN
FORD
MERCURY
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
ODYSSEY
CONTINENTAL
F-150
MARQUIS
GRAND AM GT
CAMRY
CAMRY
CHEVROLET AVALANCHE
GEO
FORD
HONDA
NISSAN
VW
TOYOTA
PRISM
BRONCO
ACCORD
MAXIMA
CABRIO
CAMRY
1996
1996
1994
1997
1995
1989
1989
2000
1995
1989
1994
1998
1996
1996
2002
1996
1990
1997
1990
1999
1998
Test Date dat
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004 x
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/18/2004
Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Flag Temp Flag Data Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar
X X displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is approx 50% lower than average for all other
X X similar displacement vehicles
X Avg exhaust temp (190C)is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (150C)is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles & suspect dilution (avg CO+CO2 = 10.03%)
Avg exhaust temp (21OC) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (160C)is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Avg exhaust temp (200C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is > 2x higher than average for all other similar
displacement vehicles, & avg exhaust temp f 400C) is 40 % higher than
similar displacement vehicles
Average exhaust temp f 520C) is 70 % higher than similar displacement
vehicles
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix R
Round 1 Driveaway
Quality Control
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
CTR_TST_ID
D
D
D
D
D
D_
D_
D_
D_
D_
D_
D_
D_
D_
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
KS1
036 1
095 1
096 1
097 1
124 1
_134_1
_138_1
_149_1
_200_1
_203_1
_254_1
_282_1
_317_1
_386_1
Disp
2.5
3.8
2.2
3.8
2
1.6
2.6
2.8
2.3
3.8
3
3.8
5
5
Disp Bin
2.1 to 2.5
3. 5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3. 5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
Make
JEEP
BUICK
SUBARU
FORD
FORD
NISSAN
CHRYSLER
CADILLAC
FORD
OLDSMOBILE
MERCURY
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
Model Model Year
WRANGLER
LESABRE
OUTBACK LEGA
THUNDERBIRD
ESCORT
SENTRA
LEBARON
CIMMARON
TEMPO
NINETY EIGHT F
SABLE
DELTA 88
CUSTOM CRUIS
CAPRICE CLASi
1995
1989
1996
1988
2002
1994
1983
1986
1986
1985
1997
1991
1984
1987
Missing Flow Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Temp Suspect
Date data Flag Flag Flag Flag Data
7/23/2004
8/2/2004
7/29/2004
8/5/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
8/12/2004 XX x
8/13/2004
8/24/2004
8/24/2004 x x
9/2/2004 x
9/10/2004
9/15/2004
9/14/2004
D KS1 1012 1 3 2.6 to 3.0 NISSAN MAXIMA 1992 8/25/2004
-------
Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement veh
Max ehxuast temp erroneous (2500C), avg exhaust temp (490C) is 30% higher than sim
displacement vehicles
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 3.9%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO+CO2 = 10.7%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement vehicles,
dilution indicates no sample favg CO + CO2 = 0.13%)
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix S
Round 1 Dynamometer Test Issues
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84032 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier
84034 1999 IsuzuTrooper
84035 2001 CMC Yukon
84036 1995 Ford Escort
84037 1979 Ford F250
84039 2001 Ford F150
84040 1990 Dodge Spirit
84042 1996 Honda Civic
84043 1991 Honda Civic
84047 1996 Mazda 626
84048 1989 Dodge Caravan
84050 2002 Honda Civic
84051 1995 Chevy Corsica
84052 1988 Olds Cutlass
84054 1995 CMC Jimmy
84055 1998 Jeep Cherokee
84056 2002 Nissan Frontier P/U
84057 2001 Saturn SL1
84058 1999Chysler300M
84060 1998BuickLeSabre
84061 1990 Chevy Cavalier
84062 1998BuickLesabre
84063 1998 Saturn SC
84064 1994 Mercury Villager
84066 1995 Jeep Wrangler
84067 1995 Dodge Caravan
84068 2001 Toyota Solara
84069 1997 Dodge Caravan Sport 90070
84071 1989 Pontiac Grand Am
Odometer
(Miles)
57066
63387
75374
1 02663
02285
48831
1 09270
131492
216571
26614
161033
50405
111484
81545
1 02924
131884
38153
51541
73246
45455
81297
45483
74642
131405
71165
138912
48090
90070
116827
Inertia
(Lbs)
3000
4500
5500
2750
3500
5500
3000
2500
2500
3000
3500
3000
3000
3000
3500
3500
4500
2500
3500
3500
2750
3500
2500
4000
3000
4000
3500
3500
3000
Hp@50mph
6.4
14.8
18.8
5.6
10.5
16.2
8.7
6.9
6.9
7.7
7.6
5.3
5.9
6.4
10.7
11.8
16.5
6.1
5.8
5.9
5.6
5.9
6.0
8.4
15.7
7.0
7.0
7.2
5.9
Time
10:57 a.m.
2:15 p.m.
4:00 p.m.
9:13a.m.
10:50 a.m.
9:20 a.m.
11:03 a.m.
9:20 a.m.
10:37 a.m.
9:31 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
8:09 a.m.
9:32 a.m.
11:01 a.m.
2:03 p.m.
3:36 p.m.
8:20 a.m.
9:45 a.m.
11:04 a.m.
2:00 p.m.
3:28 p.m.
8:20 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
2:07 p.m.
3:45 p.m.
8:26 a.m.
9:58 a.m.
12:35 p.m.
Date
07/14/2004
07/14/2004
07/14/2004
07/15/2004
07/15/2004
07/16/2004
07/16/2004
07/17/2004
07/17/2004
07/19/2004
07/19/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/22/2004
07/22/2004
07/22/2004
07/22/2004
07/22/2004
07/23/2004
07/23/2004
07/23/2004
Dyne Test Issues
Traction Control (TCS) engaged 100 sec PH1 & 3,
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Engine stalled several times.
Suspect Data
Torque data voided due to negative baseline drift.
Vehicle A/C was on during test (switch was broken).
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
No tunnel heater for this test. Difficult shifting vehicle
from 4th to 5th. Error in real-time torque measurment
corrected during data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
-------
Run#
84072
84073
84074
84076
84077
84078
84079
84081
84082
84083
84084
84086
84087
84088
84090
84091
84092
84093
84094
84096
84097
84098
84099
84101
84102
84103
84104
84105
84107
84108
84109
84110
84111
84113
84114
84115
84116
84119
Veh Yr, Make, Model
2003 Chevy S-1 0 P/U
1995 Chevy Blazer
1986 Nissan P/U
1968 FordMustang
1999 Honda Civic
1997 Honda Accord
1989 Honda Accord
1988 Ford Taurus
2003 Ford Taurus
2000 Honda Accord
1998 Chevy Malibu
2004 Honda Odyssey
2000 Hyundai Tiburon
1998 Chevrolet Lumina
1999 Ford Mustang
1991 Cadillac Seville
1999 Saturn
1997 Nissan Sentra
1993 Ford Explorer
1999 Isuzu Rodeo
2002 Mercury Sable
1999 Ford Ranger
1 999 Toyota Avalon
2004 Toyota Camry
1998 Honda Civic
2000 Nissan Maxima
1998 Plymouth Voyager
1997 Toyota Corolla
1989 Buick LeSabre
1990 Honda Civic
1998 Plymouth Voyager
1995 Ford Contour
1996 Chevrolet S-1 0 P/U
1993 Pontiac Grand Prix
1988 Ford Taurus
1995 Ford Contour
1996 Chevrolet S-1 0 P/U
1995 Jeep Cherokee
Odometer
19374
1 00766
1 38620
98864
76504
79593
209991
13139
25287
77962
99436
21035
89226
70740
39505
70502
53427
119201
1 20280
114937
24589
91045
114759
1 69043
1 49665
74273
1 63238
1 46471
1 08562
214131
1 63258
1 02084
112263
1 721 85
13158
1 02096
112276
171701
Inertia
3500
3500
3500
3000
2500
3000
2750
3500
3500
3000
3000
4500
3000
3500
3500
3500
2500
2750
4000
4000
3500
3500
3500
3500
2500
3500
4000
2750
3500
2500
4000
3000
3500
3500
3500
3000
3500
4000
Hp@50mph
12.0
10.7
11.4
8.0
5.1
4.9
6.0
4.0
6.8
7.8
5.8
12.0
5.9
5.5
9.7
6.2
5.5
7.0
10.2
14.0
6.8
12.1
5.9
7.2
5.1
7.4
7.0
7.8
7.0
6.5
7.0
5.0
9.3
5.0
4.0
5.0
9.3
13.1
Time
8:33 a.m.
10:09 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
2:30 p.m.
8:10a.m.
9:32 a.m.
11:08 a.m.
2:01 p.m.
8:14a.m.
9:41 a.m.
11:04 a.m.
8:15a.m.
9:41 a.m.
11:03 a.m.
1:47 p.m.
3:04 p.m.
8:11 a.m.
9:36 a.m.
11:09 a.m.
2:06 p.m.
8:02 a.m.
9:22 a.m.
10:43 a.m.
1:22 p.m.
2:41 p.m.
8:10a.m.
9:45 a.m.
11:02 a.m.
1:35 p.m.
3:00 p.m.
8:30 a.m.
9:57 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
1:42 p.m.
3:07 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
9:40 a.m.
12:42 p.m.
Date
07/24/2004
07/24/2004
07/24/2004
07/24/2004
07/26/2004
07/26/2004
07/26/2004
07/26/2004
07/27/2004
07/27/2004
07/27/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
07/29/2004
07/29/2004
07/29/2004
07/29/2004
07/30/2004
07/30/2004
07/30/2004
07/30/2004
07/30/2004
07/31/2004
07/31/2004
07/31/2004
07/31/2004
07/31/2004
08/02/2004
08/02/2004
08/02/2004
08/02/2004
8/02/2004
08/03/2004
08/03/2004
08/03/2004
Dyne Test Issues
Zero Drift on Torque Readout. Error in real-time torque
measurment corrected during data processing.
Phase 3 torque baseline corrected due to drift during
soak. Error in real-time torque measurment corrected
during data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Error in real-time torque measurment corrected during
data processing.
Vehicle had exhaust leaks, possible dilution.
First 630 seconds of run invalid (diluted exhaust was
inadvertently sampled into the ambient monitor)
Vehicle's traction control system was engaged during
first minute of phase 1.
Suspect Data
Duplicate test. HP set at 7.0 but read 3.4 after test.
Phase 3 torque baseline corrected due to drift during
soak.
Duplicate test. Braking violations during testing.
-------
Run#
84120
84121
84122
84123
84125
84126
84127
84128
84129
84131
84132
84133
84134
84135
84137
84138
84139
84140
84141
84143
84144
84145
84146
84148
84149
84150
84151
84153
84154
84156
84157
84160
84161
84162
84164
84165
84166
84167
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1984 Honda Civic
2001 Volvo S80
1999 Dodge Caravan
1984 Honda Civic
1995 Ford Explorer
1988 Ford Thunderbird
00 Chrysler Town and Coun
2000 Toyota Camry
1999 Toyota Celica GT
1997 Chevy Cavalier
1993 Cherokee Sport
1998 Buick Century
1 997 Mercury Grand Marqui:
1993 Ford Probe
1993 Jeep Cherokee
1995 Ford Bronco
1999 Ford Escort
2002 Chevy Blazer
1990 Honda Accord
1988 Ford Taurus
1993 Plymouth Voyager
1990 Jeep Cherokee
1988 Ford Ranger
1991 Dodge Dynasty
2002 Ford Escort SE
2000 Honda Odyssey
2000 Honda Accord
2000 Ford F150PU
1979 Ford F1 50 PU
2000 Honda Accord
1994 Nissan Sentra
2001 Ford Focus
1997 Volvo 850
1983 Chrysler Lebaron
1999 Plymouth Voyager
1991 Mazda Protege
1994 Mercury Topaz
1999 Ford Ranger P/U
Odometer
87570
55523
1 04207
87590
1 60621
1 78221
85431
48465
72233
1 281 72
1 72409
71195
74497
129131
1 72421
1 98053
66820
35072
1 70433
13170
1 70027
261848
74743
91324
26748
68979
76178
61040
53503
76191
1 27063
52253
65093
43291
74703
1 85576
9950
92926
Inertia
2250
4000
4000
2250
4500
3500
4500
3500
3000
3000
3500
3500
4000
3000
3500
5000
2750
3500
3000
3500
4000
3500
3500
3000
3000
4500
3500
4500
3500
3500
2750
3000
3500
2750
4000
2750
3000
3500
Hp@50mph
7.2
4.0
7.3
7.2
11.5
9.1
9.3
7.3
6.5
5.4
15.6
5.9
9.5
8.1
15.6
10.7
5.6
11.3
5.9
4.0
7.3
10.8
10.2
6.8
7.3
9.6
7.5
16.9
11.7
7.5
7.1
7.3
6.0
5.5
6.6
7.9
6.1
11.4
Time
2:30 p.m.
8:05 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
1:05 p.m.
2:55 p.m.
8:12a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:10a.m.
1:18p.m.
2:15 p.m.
8:10a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
3:00 p.m.
8:23 a.m.
9:45 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
2:15 p.m.
8:10a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:46 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
8:30 a.m.
9:50 a.m.
11:08 a.m.
1:50 p.m.
3:15 p.m.
9:05 a.m.
10:55 a.m.
8:22 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:50 a.m.
1:35 p.m.
3:20 p.m..
4:23 p.m.
8:25 a.m.
Date
08/03/2004
08/04/2004
08/04/2004
08/04/2004
08/04/2004
08/04/2004
08/05/2004
08/05/2004
08/05/2004
08705/2004
08/05/2004
08/6/2004
8/06/2004
08/06/2004
08/06/2004
08/06/2004
08/07/2004
08/07/2004
08/07/2004
08/07/2004
08/09/2004
08/09/2004
08/09/2004
08/09/2004
08/10/2004
08/10/2004
08/10/2004
08/10/2004
08/10/2004
08/11/2004
08/11/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/13/2004
Dyne Test Issues
Suspect Data
Braking violations during testing.
Bags were being evacuated for the first 30 seconds of
phase 1
Vehicle difficult to start at beginning of test.
Drive trace violations due to sticky throttle and drive trace
display monitor failure at the start of phase 3.
Braking violations during testing.
Vehicle difficult to start at beginning of test.
Vehicle tie-down straps too tight at start of phase 1,
loosened 60 to 90 seconds into test.
Braking violations during testing, Phase 2 dilution temp
over 50C.
Tire/roller slippage at start of test.
Ibs).
Vehicle stalled during phase 1, possible dilution due to
exhaust leaks.
Torque meter read 4.6 bias prior to test, reset before test
began.
Tire/roller slippage at start of test.
Drive trace violations. Real-time phase 1 HC pegged.
Tailpipe fell off during soak, first 90 seconds of phase 3
lost. Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
No tedlar bag data for phases 1 or 2.
Silicone boot used to connect exhuast to dilution tunnel
began smoking at the end of phase 2.
-------
Run#
84168
84169
84171
84172
84173
84174
84175
84177
84178
84179
84180
84182
84183
84184
84185
84187
84188
84189
84191
84192
84193
84195
84196
84197
84198
84200
84201
84205
84206
84208
84209
84210
84211
84213
Veh Yr, Make, Model
996 Buick Regal Grand Spo
1994 Mercury Topaz
1988 Honda Civic DX
1986 Cadillac Cimmaron
1996 Mercury Sable
1994 Mercury Topaz
1988 Pontiac Bonneville
1988 Ford Taurus
1997 Toyota Camry
1998 Jeep Cherokee
!988 Pontiac Bonneville
1995 Ford Thunderbird
2000 Toyota Corolla
2000 Honda Civic
1996 Toyota Corolla
1988 Ford Taurus
1977 Chevy Monte Carlo
1984 Ford F1 50 Pickup
2000 Toyota Camry
2001 CMC Sonoma
2001 Hyundai Sante Fe
1999 Chevy Lumina
1993 CMC Safari
1990 Buick Regal
1994 Saturn SL1
1994 Saturn SL1
1985ChevS10
1998 Ford F1 50
1994 Chevy P/U
1989 Lincoln Towncar
1996 Dodge Stratus
1988 Mazda MX6
1986 Ford Tempo
1985 Olds Regency 98
Odometer
1 39861
9961
205828
17610
110411
32694
236760
13189
1 29432
82874
236790
1 35049
70126
40410
1 48865
13208
35553735553
72318
47780
60059
70621
42985
283231
1 03881
116791
116822
30305
98670
99225
82512
1 26733
222715
60031
1 88058
Inertia
3500
3000
2250
3000
3500
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
4000
2750
2750
2750
3500
4000
3500
3500
3500
4000
3500
4000
3000
2500
2500
3000
4500
4000
4000
3000
3000
2500
3500
Hp@50mph
5.6
6.1
6.4
5.9
6.9
6.1
8.5
4.0
7.3
11.8
8.5
10.6
7.5
7.0
6.6
4.0
11.6
12.9
7.3
11.3
8.7
5.4
12.5
6.8
4.7
4.7
10.4
13.3
12.2
12.7
7.5
6.8
6.9
7.9
Time
9:30 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
1:22 p.m.
2:30 p.m.
8:15a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
1:54 p.m.
8:15a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:42 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
8:15a.m.
9:30 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
8:10a.m.
9:30 a.m.
11:05 a.m.
8:15a.m.
9:34 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
1:57 p.m.
3:20 p.m.
8:33 a.m.
9:51 a.m.
8:07 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
9:23 a.m.
10:40 a.m.
1:20 p.m.
8:23 a.m.
9:47 a.m.
11:03 a.m.
1:44 p.m.
Date
08/13/2004
08/13/2004
08/13/2004
08/13/2004
08/14/2004
08/14/2004
08/14/2004
08/14/2004
08/16/2004
08/16/2004
08/16/2004
08/16/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/18/2004
08/18/2004
08/18/2004
08/19/2004
08/19/2004
08/19/2004
08/19/2004
08/19/2004
08/20/2004
08/20/2004
08/21/2004
08/21/2004
08/23/2004
08/23/2004
08/23/2004
08/24/2004
08/24/2004
08/24/2004
08/24/2004
84214 1994 Pontiac Bonneville 125226 3500 5.3
84215 1992 Nissan Maxima 53987 3500 8.5
84216 1990 Ford F150 P/U 7131 4000 15.5
84218 1988 Ford Taurus 13239 3500 4.0
9:30 a.m.
10:53 a.m.
2:00 p.m.
08/25/2004
08/25/2004
08/25/2004
08/25/2004
Dyne Test Issues
Vehicle stalled twice during phase 2.
Possible drive trace violation during phase 2 (driver
switched at 700 seconds).
Braking violations during testing.
Vehicle stalled at beginning of phase 1.
Braking violations during testing.
Torque zero drifting, and phase 2 drive trace violations
due to trace monitor failure.
Braking violations during testing.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. Vehicle stalled
during phase 2 (770 seconds). Realtime HC pegged for
most of test.
Testsed at 3500 Ib inertia instead of 4500 Ib inertia
specified for this engine code.
Braking violations during testing.
Vehicle difficult to start at beginning of test.
No bag data for phases 1 and 2. Braking violations
during testing.
Suspect Data
Vehicle started approximately 20 seconds into Phase 1.
Phase 3 torque baseline corrected due to drift during
soak.
Phase 3 torque baseline corrected due to drift during
soak.
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
-------
Run#
84219
84220
84221
84223
84224
84225
84227
84228
84229
84230
84231
84233
84234
84235
84236
84238
84239
84240
84241
84242
84244
84245
84246
84248
84250
84252
84253
84256
84257
84258
84259
84261
84262
84263
84265
84266
84267
84268
84270
84271
84272
84274
84276
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1994 Chrysler Concorde
1 992 Ford Escort
985 Ford LTD Crown Victor!
2005 Dodge Caravan
2002 Ford Taurus
2000 Honda Civic LX
1997 Buick Century
1992 Pontiac Grand Am
2000 Olds Silhouette
1993 Nissan Sentra
1994 Olds Eighty Eight
1989 Toyota Corolla
1991 VW Cabriolet
1990Geo Prizm
1992 Olds Achieva
1988 Pontiac 6000 Wagon
1987 Ford Taurus
1998 Infiniti ISO
1998 Ford Contour
1997 Plymouth Voyager
1992 Ford Escort
1987 Honda Accord
1994 Eagle Talon
1987 Ford Ranger
1987 Ford Escort
2001 Ford Taurus
1997 Mercury Sable
1 989 Chevy S10 P/U
1983 Volvo GL
1991 Olds Delta 88
1988 Ford Taurus
1989 Toyota Camry
1991 Olds Delta 88
1989 Dodge Ram P/U
1984 Buick Century
2000 Kia Sephia
1989 Chevrolet Cavalier
1994 Ford F1 50 P/U
1 986 Mercury Grand Marqui:
1979 Buick LeSabre
2001 Honda Accord
1995 Ford Aspire
1989 Buick Park Avenue
Odometer
169018
12788
1 00260
18159
72468
35766
86430
140191
85292
87073
128014
181875
63829
176712
177104
1 33737
33610
50005
118535
70430
11345
19268
1 09747
1705
78217
30917
1 04330
1 74034
1 84224
226269
13250
269020
227290
1 32325
1878
58660
58439
1 69749
36277
37608
39702
1 88078
1 28607
Inertia
3500
2750
3500
4000
3500
2750
3500
3000
4000
2500
3500
2500
2750
2500
3000
3500
3000
3500
3000
3500
2750
2750
3500
3000
2500
3500
3500
3000
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3000
2750
2750
4500
4000
3500
3500
2250
3500
Hp@50mph
7.8
6.4
9.3
8.0
6.5
7.0
5.9
4.7
11.5
6.2
6.5
5.9
8.0
6.9
4.9
6.8
6.9
6.4
4.8
6.7
7.4
6.0
10.6
10.4
7.4
6.8
8.0
10.4
10.5
7.0
4.0
7.7
7.0
15.0
7.3
6.3
6.7
12.9
10.7
10.5
7.8
6.1
6.0
Time
8:16a.m.
9:34 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
8:09 a.m.
9:27 a.m.
10:35 a.m.
1:08 p.m.
2:20 p.m.
8:55 a.m.
10:11 a.m.
11:28 a.m.
2:05 p.m.
8:11 a.m.
9:25 a.m.
10:47 a.m.
1:53 p.m.
3:10 p.m.
8:26 a.m.
9:43 a.m.
11:08 a.m.
1:56 p.m.
3:37 p.m.
8:14a.m.
10:52 a.m.
1:16 p.m.
8:10a.m.
9:27 a.m.
1:22 p.m.
2:44 p.m.
8:45 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
8:17a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:58 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
8:13a.m.
9:38 a.m.
10:50 a.m.
1:21 p.m.
2:55 p.m.
8:31 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
12:26 p.m.
Date
08/26/2004
08/26/2004
08/26/2004
08/27/2004
08/27/2004
08/27/2004
08/27/2004
08/27/2004
08/28/2004
08/28/2004
08/28/2004
08/28/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/31/2004
08/31/2004
08/31/2004
08/31/2004
08/31/2004
09/01/2004
09/01/2004
09/01/2004
09/02/2004
09/02/2004
09/02/2004
09/02/2004
09/08/2004
09/08/2004
09/09/2004
09/09/2004
09/09/2004
09/09/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/11/2004
09/11/2004
09/11/2004
Dyne Test Issues
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Vehicle stalled once during Phase 2.
Suspect Data
Bag 1 did not fill. Also, engine stalled at 10 seconds.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leak. Vehicle stalled
twice during idle portion of test.
Test stopped during Phase 2 at 1300 seconds.
Vehicle stalled 10 seconds into Phase 1.
Possible braking violations.
Tire/roller slippage at start of test.
Invalid RH readings, corrected using airport data.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leak. Possible trace
violation due to clutch slippage.
Vehicle run at 3000 Ibs for the first 700 seconds of this
duplicate test.
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Ignition switch stuck at beginning of Phase 3.
-------
Run#
84277
84278
84279
84280
84281
84283
84284
84285
84286
84287
84289
84290
84291
84292
84293
84295
84296
84297
84298
84300
84301
84302
84303
84304
84305
84307
84308
84309
84310
84311
84312
84314
84315
84316
84317
84318
84319
84321
84322
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1978MGMGB
1990 CMC Jimmy
2001 Toyota Camry 3.0L
1999 Ford Escort
1995 Chevy Suburban
1986 Dodge P/U
1987 Chevy Caprice Wagon
2000 Honda Civic
1997 Olds. Silhouette
!995 CMC Sierra P/U
54 Olds Custom Cruiser Wac
!988 Ford Taurus
1997 Honda Civic
1997 Toyota Camry
1984 Volvo GL Wagon
1987 Chevy Caprice Classic
1998 Honda Civic
1996 Dodge Stratus
1999 Dodge Durango
1990 Buick Lesabre
1989 Pontiac Grand Prix
1993 Ford F1 50 P/U
2002 Olds Silhouette
2001 Honda Civic
1999 Chevy Malibu
1992 Honda Accord
1994 Pontiac Grand Am
1973 Mercedes 280 SE
2003 Chevy Venture
1989 Toyota Corolla
1994 Pontiac Grand Am
1989 Plymouth Sundance
1991 Plymouth Voyager
1996 Dodge Avenger
2000 Nissan Altima
1997 Nissan Sentra
1998 Toyota Camry
1 996 Toyota Avalon
1990 Toyota Camry
Odometer
42926
1 30254
61415
74102
73848
47582
29828
46677
1 1 1 026
1 71 370
8983
13266
75783
127414
299703
85915
115370
1 46579
92681
59413
1 49395
1 84984
40271
49751
76627
74582
1 01 526
81588
24915
80749
1 01 538
1 44672
1 58771
1 24729
95313
1 54255
1 27663
108189
202804
Inertia
2750
3500
4000
2750
5000
3500
4500
2750
4000
4000
4500
3500
2500
3500
3000
4000
2500
3000
5000
3500
3500
4500
4500
2750
3500
3000
3000
4000
4500
2500
3000
2750
3500
3000
3500
2750
3500
3500
3000
Hp@50mph
6.1
14.5
7.0
4.9
10.8
12.8
9.6
7.0
10.1
12.2
11.6
4.0
5.0
7.3
10.7
9.7
5.1
7.5
16.9
6.8
4.5
12.8
16.2
8.0
5.8
5.7
5.4
11.4
16.2
5.9
5.4
6.9
7.6
4.4
7.9
7.0
6.4
6.2
5.9
Time
1:44 p.m.
3:21 p.m.
8:42 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
11:18a.m.
1:50 p.m.
3:30 p.m.
8:28 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:59 a.m.
1:55 p.m.
3:18 p.m.
8:21 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:53 a.m.
2:07 p.m.
8:23 a.m.
9:48 a.m.
11:05 a.m.
1:35 p.m.
3:00 p.m.
4:25 p.m.
8:08 a.m.
9:25 a.m.
10:43 a.m.
1:20 p.m.
2:30 p.m.
3:55 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
9:10a.m.
10:30 a.m.
1:00 p.m.
2:15 p.m.
3:38 p.m.
8:06 a.m.
9:18a.m.
10:38 a.m.
1:21 p.m.
2:40 p.m.
Date
09/11/2004
09/11/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/14/2004
09/14/2004
09/14/2004
09/14/2004
09/14/2004
09/15/2004
09/15/2004
09/15/2004
09/15/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
08/21/2004
08/21/2004
08/21/2004
08/21/2004
09/21/2004
Dyne Test Issues Suspect Data
No bag data available.
Torque zero board dislodged for Phase 2 of test through
end of test. x
Vehicle stalled 230 into Phase 1.
Braking violations during testing.
Real-time HC pegged during Phase 1. x
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Driving violations at start of Phase 3 due to automatic
engagement of traction control. Vehicle restart during
Phase 3 to reset.
Phase 1 driving violations due to vehicle stalling.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks, real-time HC
saturation. x
Vehicle stalled during Phase 1.
Vehicle stalled during Phase 1. Possible dilution due to
exhaust leaks.
Possible high background concentration due to truck
running outside building. Vehicle stalled during Phase 1. x
Ozonator air ran out during Phases 2 and 3, modal NOx
invalid for these two phases. x
Real-time HC pegged during Phase 1.
Braking violations during testing.
Traction control engaged 1 st 40 seconds of bag 1.
Braking violations during testing.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84323 2004 Kia Rio Cinco
84324 1999 Toyota Camry
84325 1998 Nissan Maxima
84327 1998 Ford Taurus
84328 1996 Toyota Avalon
84329 1997 Jeep Wrangler
84330 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier
84332 1997 Pontiac Grand Am
84334 Chevrolet Caprice Estate W
84335 1988 Mercury Grand Marqui:
84336 1987 Toyota P/U
84337 2003 Ford Ranger P/U
84338 2001 Saturn
84339 999 Plymouth Grand Voyag<
84341 1997 Pontiac Grand Am
84342 1994 Toyota Camry
84343 2004 Kia Sedona
84344 2000 Toyota Sienna
84345 1997 Chevrolet Lumina
84347 1995 Toyota Corolla
84348 1988 Ford Taurus
84349 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
84350 1997 Chevrolet Lumina
84351 1996 Ford Contour
84353 1993 Saturn Wagon
84354 1989 Ford F150
84355 2001 Chevrolet Lumina
84356 1997 Pontiac Grand Am
84357 1995 Mercury Tracer
84359 1992 Toyota Corolla
84360 1988 Ford Taurus
84361 2002 Nissan Maxima
84362 1998 Ford Taurus
84363 1996 Toyota Corolla
84365 1993 Ford Taurus
84366 1989 Olds Cutlass Wagon
84367 1980Mercedes 450 SEL
84368 1997 Saturn SL
84369 1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
84370 1995 Ford Taurus
84372 1994 Toyota Camry
84373 1990 Chevrolet Astrovan
Odometer
6260
60286
111655
77804
108210
94832
8420
57230
72464
87717
225176
11678
63172
75489
57260
1 28229
6344
131771
1 33436
1 06201
13303
22365
1 33465
98572
220839
61510
57829
1 20921
1 46970
84923
13323
80356
91855
288784
69365
118187
1 85888
1 70227
81784
70394
88215
235476
Inertia
2750
3500
3000
3500
3500
3500
3000
3000
4500
4000
2750
3500
3000
4000
3000
3500
4000
4000
3500
2500
3500
3000
3500
3000
3000
4000
3500
3000
2750
2750
3500
3500
3500
2750
3500
3000
4000
2500
3500
3500
3500
4000
Hp@50mph
6.7
6.4
6.1
5.0
6.2
16.1
3.9
3.8
9.6
12.5
9.6
4.1
6.4
6.6
3.8
7.2
6.8
6.5
5.3
6.0
4.0
12.7
5.3
5.6
4.8
15.3
7.0
3.8
4.5
8.6
4.0
5.0
5.0
6.6
5.5
5.7
8.3
6.7
7.3
5.4
7.2
12.0
Time
8:00 a.m.
9:12 a.m.
10:28 a.m.
12:47 p.m.
1:57 p.m.
3:11 p.m.
8:08 a.m.
10:35 a.m.
1:01 p.m.
2:15 p.m.
3:34 p.m.
8:10a.m.
9:24 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
2:02 p.m.
3:14p.m.
8:20 a.m.
9:43 a.m.
10:55 a.m.
1:16 p.m.
2:54 p.m.
8:1 Oa.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:46 a.m.
1:27 p.m.
2:52 p.m.
8:07 a.m.
9:22 a.m.
10:52 a.m.
1:22 p.m.
2:36 p.m.
8:13a.m.
9:29 a.m.
10.44a.m.
1:30 p.m.
2:52 p.m.
4:10 p.m.
8:08 a.m.
9:33 a.m.
11:01 a.m.
1:40 p.m.
3:00 p.m.
Date
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/22/2004
09/22/2004
09/22/2004
09/22/2004
09/22/2004
09/23/2004
09/23/2004
09/23/2004
09/23/2004
09/23/2004
09/24/2004
09/24/2004
09/24/2004
09/24/2004
09/24/2004
09/25/2004
09/25/2004
09/25/2004
09/25/2004
09/25/2004
09/27/2004
09/27/2004
09/27/2004
09/27/2004
09/27/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
Dyne Test Issues
Suspect Data
HC2 not responding.
Possible high background concentration due to smoke
from under hood.
Braking violations during testing.
Ozonator air ran out during test, modal NOx invalid for
entire test.
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leak. Plug wires
disconnected at 700 seconds, reconnected at first idle of
phase 3.
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84374 1988 Ford Taurus
84375 2001 Ford Windstar
84376 2000 Honda Odyssey
84377 1997 Honda Accord
84379 1998 Pontiac Grand Am
84380 1995 Lincoln Continental
84381 1994 Mercury Marquis
84382 1999VWCabrio
84383 1996 Toyota Camry
84384 1996GeoPrizm
84386 1990 Nissan Maxima
84387 1988 Ford Taurus
84388 2001 Toyota Camry
84389 2001 Toyota Camry
84390 2001 Toyota Camry
84391 2001 Toyota Camry
84392 na
Odometer
13352
37923
117948
77801
75722
1 00959
1 27784
38317
1 64875
1 69535
258738
13370
na
na
na
na
na
Inertia
3500
4500
4500
3000
3000
4000
4000
3000
3500
2750
2750
3500
3000
3000
3000
3000
na
Hp@50mph
4.0
10.1
9.6
4.9
4.4
5.7
10.7
6.9
6.9
7.0
5.8
4.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
na
Time
5:00 p.m.
8:11 a.m.
9:24 a.m.
10:52 a.m.
1:20 p.m.
2:58 p.m.
4:12 p.m.
8:15a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:50 a.m.
1:10p.m.
3:15 p.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
2:45 p.m.
4:00 p.m.
Date
09/29/2004
09/30/2004
09/30/2004
09/30/2004
09/30/2004
09/30/2004
09/30/2004
10/01/2004
10/01/2004
10/01/2004
10/01/2004
10/01/2004
10/02/2004
10/02/2004
10/02/2004
10/02/2004
10/02/2004
Dyne Test Issues
Suspect Data
Vehicle would not go into gear for first 2 minutes.
Disregard, test is for PEMS flowmeter evaluation.
Disregard, test is for PEMS flowmeter evaluation.
Disregard, test is for PEMS flowmeter evaluation.
Disregard, test is for PEMS flowmeter evaluation.
Disregard, dilution tunnel injections.
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model Odometer Inertia Hp@50mph Time Date Dyne Test Issues Suspect Data
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix T
Round 2 Conditioning Run
Quality Control
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
CTR TST ID
C_KS2_453_1
C KS2 462 1
C_KS2_484_1
C KS2 491 1
C_KS2_495_1
C KS2 511 1
C_KS2_518_1
C KS2 521 1
C_KS2_530_1
C KS2 531 1
C_KS2_532_1
C KS2 533 1
C_KS2_534_1
C KS2 537 1
C_KS2_538_1
C KS2 539 1
C_KS2_540_1
C KS2 541 1
C_KS2_542_1
C_KS2_543_1
C KS2 544 1
C_KS2_545_1
C KS2 546 1
C_KS2_547_1
C KS2 548 1
C_KS2_549_1
C KS2 550 1
C_KS2_551_1
C KS2 552 1
C_KS2_553_1
C KS2 555 1
C_KS2_556_1
C KS2 557 1
C_KS2_558_1
C_KS2_559_1
C KS2 562 1
C_KS2_563_1
C KS2 564 1
C_KS2_565_1
C KS2 566 1
C_KS2_567_1
C KS2 567 2
C_KS2_567_3
C KS2 568 1
C_KS2_569_1
C_KS2_570_1
C KS2 571 1
C_KS2_572_1
C KS2 574 1
C_KS2_575_1
C KS2 576 1
C_KS2_577_1
C KS2 579 1
C_KS2_580_1
C_KS2_581_1
Disp
3.5
3.5
3.8
3.5
4
3
3.3
3.8
1.9
3.5
3.5
3.5
2.2
3.3
2.3
1.5
1.6
3.3
2.3
3
3
5.7
3.1
1.6
1.9
3.1
2.4
3.8
5.9
1.6
4
2.3
4
2.2
4
3.1
2.5
1.9
2.4
5
4
4
4
3
4.3
1.9
3.8
5.3
3.1
4.6
1.6
3.8
3
3.8
2.2
Disp Bin
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
0 to 1 .6
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
Make
HONDA
KIA
CHRYSLER
HONDA
JEEP
TOYOTA
DODGE
MITSUBISHI
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
HONDA
HONDA
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
HONDA
TOYOTA
DODGE
PONTIAC
DODGE
MERCURY
FORD
CHEVROLET
HONDA
SATURN
CHEVROLET
PONTIAC
CHEVROLET
DODGE
HONDA
JEEP
HONDA
FORD
SATURN
JEEP
CHEVROLET
DODGE
SATURN
MITSUBISHI
MERCURY
JEEP
JEEP
JEEP
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
SATURN
BUICK
CHEVROLET
BUICK
FORD
GEO
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
PLYMOUTH
SATURN
Model
ODYSSEY
SEDONA
TOWN & CC
ODYSSEY
CHEROKEE
SIENNALE
GRAND CAF
MONTERO
ESCORT LX
SILVERADO
300M
ODYSSEY
ACCORD
VOYAGER
ACCORD
CIVIC
COROLLA
CARAVAN
GRAN DAM
CARAVAN
SABLE
F250
MALIBU
CIVIC
NULL
LUMINA
GRAN DAM
IMPALA
DURANGO
CIVIC
GRAND CHI
ACCORD
EXPLORER
LS1
CHEROKEE
MALIBU
SPIRIT
SC2
GALANT
GRAND MAI
WRANGLER
WRANGLER
WRANGLER
CAMRY
S-10
SEDAN
PARK AVEIx
SILVER ADC
CENTURY
F150
PRIZM
BONNEVILL
SIENNA
VOYAGER
SEDAN
Model Year
2002
2004
2002
2003
2001
2001
2002
2003
1995
1976
1999
2000
1997
1998
2001
1991
1995
1997
1989
2000
2002
1979
1999
1996
1996
1998
1997
2003
1999
1998
1995
2000
1995
2000
1998
1998
1990
2001
2001
1991
1997
1997
1997
1994
1995
1999
1995
2002
2001
2001
1991
1995
2000
1999
2001
Missing Flow
Test Date data Flag
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
2/22/2005
4/5/2005
4/4/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
2/7/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005 x
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005 x
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005 x
1/15/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005 x
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/20/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/21/2005 x
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
Dilution
Flag
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.1 %
Average exhaust flow is > 5
i> higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 5
i> higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
aux temp erroneous (215C), not a data issue
Exhast temp is 20% lower and exhaust flow is 40% higher than similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 7.8%, avg exhaust temp (1OOC) is 60% lower than
similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.5%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.6%
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.9%, avg exhaust temp (130C) is 40% lower than
similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.9%
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.8%
Avg exhaust temp (130C) is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
-------
CTR TST ID
C_KS2_582_1
C KS2 583 1
C_KS2_583_2
C KS2 584 1
C_KS2_585_1
C KS2 586 1
C_KS2_593_1
C KS2 594 1
C_KS2_595_1
C KS2 596 1
C_KS2_597_1
C KS2 599 1
C_KS2_599_2
C_KS2_600_1
C KS2 602 1
C_KS2_605_1
C KS2 606 1
C KS2 607 1
C_KS2_608_1
C KS2 609 1
C_KS2_611_1
C KS2 612 1
C_KS2_614_1
C KS2 616 1
C_KS2_617_1
C_KS2_618_1
C KS2 619 1
C_KS2_622_1
C KS2 623 1
C_KS2_623_2
C KS2 624 1
C_KS2_624_2
C_KS2_625_1
C KS2 626 1
C_KS2_627_1
C KS2 627 2
C_KS2_627_3
C KS2 628 1
C_KS2_631_1
C KS2 632 1
C_KS2_633_1
C_KS2_634_1
C KS2 635 1
C_KS2_638_1
C KS2 639 1
C_KS2_640_1
C KS2 641 1
C_KS2_642_1
C KS2 643 1
C_KS2_644_1
C KS2 644 2
C_KS2_645_1
C_KS2_646_1
Disp
2.5
3.1
3.1
3
3
3.1
3
3
2.3
4.6
3
3.8
3.8
2
3.3
3
5
2.3
4.5
5
4
2
1.5
4
2
4.9
3.3
2.1
4.9
4.9
2.3
2.3
4.2
2.4
3.8
3.8
3.8
5
2.3
2.2
4.2
3
5.7
3
1.8
2.4
3.5
3
3.2
3.3
3.3
5
4.3
Disp Bin
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
0 to 1.6
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
Make
CHEVROLET
BUICK
BUICK
NISSAN
FORD
PONTIAC
FORD
PLYMOUTH
FORD
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
DODGE
DODGE
CHEVROLET
FORD
M.BENZ
CHEVROLET
FORD
DODGE
HONDA
JEEP
DODGE
BUICK
DODGE
MAZDA
CADILLAC
CADILLAC
FORD
FORD
BUICK
TOYOTA
BUICK
BUICK
BUICK
CHEVROLET
FORD
GMC
FORD
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
TOYOTA
ACURA
NISSAN
CHRYSLER
FORD
CHRYSLER
DODGE
DODGE
FORD
CHEVROLET
Model
TRACKER
REGAL
REGAL
MAXIMA
TAURUS
GRAND PRI
AEROSTAR
VOYAGER
RANGER
CROWN VIC
AEROSTAR
LUMINALS
LUMINALS
CONTOUR
INTREPID
CARAVAN
SILVERADO
TEMPO
280 SE
MONTE CAF
EXPLORER
RAM
CIVIC
CHEROKEE
NEON
LASABRE
CARAVAN
B2200
FLEETWOO
FLEETWOO
RANGER
RANGER
RAINER
TRUCK
LESABRE
LESABRE
LESABRE
C10 SILVER
RANGER XL
SONOMA
FREEST AR
4RUNNERS
SUBURBAN
SIENNAXLE
INTEGRA
FRONTIER
CONCORD
TAURUS
CONCORD
INTREPID
INTREPID
F150
ASTROVAN
Model Year
2003
1994
1994
1995
1995
1993
1993
1989
1988
1995
1992
1994
1994
1995
1994
1989
1996
1986
1973
1977
1996
1989
1988
1998
1996
1979
1996
1992
1991
1991
1990
1990
2004
1987
1995
1995
1995
1984
1997
1996
2004
1995
1995
2001
1995
1998
1996
2002
2000
1993
1993
1989
1992
Missing Flow
Test Date data Flag
1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005 x
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/26/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/27/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005 x
1/27/2005
1/27/2005 x
1/28/2005
1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/29/2005 x
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005 x
1/31/2005
2/1/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
2/2/2005 x
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/1/2005
2/1/2005 x
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005 x
2/2/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/5/2005
Dilution
Flag
x
x
X
Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Avg exhaust temp (130C) is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp (130C) is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.9%
avg exhaust temp (130C) is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp (1OOC) is 60% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Aux temp suspect (41 C), not a data issue
Aux temp erroneous (190C), not a data issue
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, avg exhaust temp (110C) is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 9
Average exhaust flow is > 5
i> higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp (1 OOC) is 60% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Ambient temp erroneous (avg of-40C)
Avg exhaust temp (200C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles, avg exhaust
flow is 30% higher than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 8.4%, avg exhaust temp (41OC) is 70% higher than
similar displacement vehicle.
Avg exhaust temp (120C) is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, ambient temp suspect (avg T of-40C)
Avg exhaust temp (90C) is 60% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp (51 OC) is 80% higher than similar displacement vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp (130C) is 50% lowerrthan similar displacement vehicles.
-------
CTR TST ID
C_KS2_647_1
C_KS2_648_1
C_KS2_649_1
C KS2 651 1
C_KS2_653_1
C KS2 654 1
C_KS2_655_1
C_KS2_656_1
C KS2 660 1
C_KS2_661_1
C KS2 662 1
C_KS2_663_1
C KS2 664 1
C_KS2_665_1
C KS2 667 1
C_KS2_668_1
C KS2 670 1
C_KS2_671_1
C KS2 674 1
C KS2 675 1
C_KS2_676_1
C KS2 677 1
C_KS2_677_2
C KS2 679 1
C_KS2_680_1
C KS2 681 1
C_KS2_681_2
C KS2 681 3
C_KS2_682_1
C KS2 682 2
C_KS2_685_1
C KS2 686 1
C_KS2_689_1
C KS2 689 2
C_KS2_693_1
C KS2 694 1
C_KS2_695_1
C KS2 698 1
C_KS2_700_1
C KS2 701 1
C_KS2_702_1
C KS2 703 1
C_KS2_704_1
C_KS2_705_1
C KS2 706 1
C_KS2_707_1
C_KS2_709_1
C KS2 709 2
C_KS2_711_1
C_KS2_712_1
C KS2 713 1
C_KS2_715_1
Disp
5.7
5.4
1.5
4.4
3.5
3.1
4.3
3
3.3
4.6
2.3
3
2.2
3
4.3
5.9
1.6
2.5
2
5.7
2.2
3.4
3.4
4
5.7
3.3
3.3
3.3
4
4
3.9
1.8
5
5
3.5
3.4
4.9
3.3
3.8
3.9
4.3
5
4.9
3.7
2.2
3.3
4
4
2.3
2.3
2.2
5.7
Disp Bin
5.1 to 6.0
5.1 to 6.0
0 to 1.6
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
5.1 to 6.0
Make
CHEVROLET
FORD
HONDA
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
BUICK
CHEVROLET
DODGE
DODGE
LINCOLN
ISUZU
FORD
HONDA
DODGE
CHEVROLET
DODGE
GEO
PLYMOUTH
HONDA
CHEVROLET
SUBARU
PONTIAC
PONTIAC
FORD
CHEVROLET
DODGE
DODGE
DODGE
JEEP
JEEP
DODGE
TOYOTA
LINCOLN
LINCOLN
ISUZU
OLDS
FORD
CHRYSLER
BUICK
DODGE
CHEVROLET
FORD
CADILLAC
DODGE
HONDA
DODGE
FORD
FORD
MERCURY
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
Model
SUBURBAN
F150
CIVIC
CAPRICE
CONCORDE
SKYLARK
ASTRO VAh
CARAVAN
GRAND CAF
TOWNCAR
PICKUP
TAURUS
ACCORD
GRAND CAF
C1500
RAMPU
TRACKER
SUNDANCE
CRV
SUBURBAN
LEGACY VW
MONTANA
MONTANA
RANGER
TAHOE
GRAND CAF
GRAND CAF
GRAND CAF
CHEROKEE
CHEROKEE
DAKOTA
COROLLA
TOWN CAR
TOWN CAR
AXIOM
SILHOUTTE
F150
TOWN & CC
PARK AVEI\
DAKOTA
S-10
COUNTRY £
SEDAN DE\
DAKOTA
ODYSSEY
GRAND CAF
RANGER
RANGER
TOPAZ
RANGER
TAURUS
SILVERADO
Model Year
1994
2001
1992
1982
2002
1994
1993
1992
1998
1991
1995
2001
1997
2003
1996
1995
1992
1992
1998
1999
1993
2003
2003
1998
1996
1996
1996
1996
2000
2000
1999
1995
1988
1988
2002
2002
1992
2001
2000
1998
2001
1986
1992
2004
1995
1998
2002
2002
1994
1996
1995
1994
Missing
Test Date data
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/6/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/8/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/10/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
4/2/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/12/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/12/2005
2/11/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005 x
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
Flow
Flag
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 11.0%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, avg exhaust temp (130C) is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = .01% (no sampling)
Erroneous ambient temp (average of 53C)
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 5
i> lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.8%
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.0%
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.7%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.7%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.1%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, avg exhaust temp (130C) is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.4%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, no exhaust temp measured
Ambient temp erroneous (avg of-38C)
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, avg exhaust temp (110C) is 60% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
-------
CTR_TST_ID Disp Disp Bin
Missing
Model Year Test Date data
Flow
Flag
Dilution
Flag
Exh Temp
Flag
Ambient
Temp Flag
Suspect
Data
C_KS2_716_1
C KS2 716 2
C_KS2_718_1
C KS2 719 1
C_KS2_721_1
C KS2 721 2
C_KS2_722_1
C KS2 722 2
C_KS2_723_1
C KS2 723 2
C_KS2_724_1
C KS2 725 1
C_KS2_726_1
C_KS2_727_1
C KS2 727 2
C_KS2_728_1
C_KS2_728_2
C KS2 729 1
C_KS2_731_1
C KS2 733 1
C_KS2_734_1
C KS2 736 1
C_KS2_737_1
C_KS2_738_1
C_KS2_738_2
C KS2 739 1
C_KS2_740_1
C_KS2_743_1
C KS2 743 2
C_KS2_743_3
C KS2 743 4
C_KS2_744_1
C_KS2_747_1
C KS2 749 1
C_KS2_750_1
C KS2 751 1
C_KS2_753_1
C KS2 757 1
C_KS2_760_1
C KS2 761 1
C_KS2_761_2
C KS2 761 3
C_KS2_764_1
C KS2 767 1
C_KS2_770_1
C KS2 772 1
C_KS2_774_1
C KS2 774 2
C_KS2_775_1
C KS2 776 1
C_KS2_777_1
C KS2 778 1
C KS2 779 1
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.1
3.8
3.8
2.9
2.9
2.3
2.3
4.3
3.8
4.3
2.7
2.7
3.1
3.1
3.8
1.9
2.4
3
3
5.7
1.9
1.9
3
3
5
5
5
5
2.3
3
2
2
3
3.8
3.8
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
3.1
2.8
2.5
3.8
3
3
3.8
4.9
4
7.5
5.7
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
0 to 1.6
0 to 1.6
0 to 1.6
0 to 1.6
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
>6.0
5.1 to 6.0
FORD
FORD
BUICK
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
VOLVO
VOLVO
FORD
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
CHEVROLET
BMW
BMW
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
FORD
NISSAN
PLYMOUTH
MERCURY
BUICK
SATURN
SATURN
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
HONDA
TOYOTA
PONTIAC
FORD
FORD
FORD
BUICK
MAZDA
DATSUN
DATSUN
DATSUN
BUICK
DATSUN
TOYOTA
BUICK
NISSAN
NISSAN
OLDSMOBILE
FORD
FORD
FORD
OLDSMOBILE
TAURUS
TAURUS
PARK AVEI\
LUMINA
WINDSTAR
WINDSTAR
960
960
TEMPO
TEMPO
BLAZER
TOWN & CC
S-10LS
528E
528E
CORSICA
CORSICA
TOWN & CC
ESCORT
PICKUP XE
VOYAGER
VILLAGER
LESABRE
SL2
SL2
TAURUS
ESCAPE
LTD
LTD
LTD
LTD
ACCORD B
4 RUNNER
SUNBIRD
ESCORT SE
TAURUS GL
WINDSTAR
REGAL
PROTEGE
210WAGOI^
210WAGOI*
210WAGOI^
SKYLARK
280Z
CAMRY
REGAL
QUEST
QUEST
DELTA 88
F-150
RANGER XL
F-250
DELTA 88
1993
1993
1993
1994
1998
1998
1993
1993
1993
1993
1996
2002
1995
1988
1988
1995
1995
1996
1993
1995
1993
1997
1978
2001
2001
1993
2002
1979
1979
1979
1979
1998
1993
1994
1998
1997
1998
1979
1998
1979
1979
1979
1998
1977
1989
1978
1996
1996
1990
1987
2000
1989
1978
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/17/2005
3/18/2005
3/24/2005
4/5/2005
3/28/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
3/10/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
3/29/2005
2/25/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
3/19/2005
3/21/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
3/25/2005
2/28/2005
3/30/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/29/2005
3/2/2005
3/3/2005
3/3/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
Data Review Comments
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, no exhaust temp (C) measured
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.8%, avg exhaust temp (140C) is 40% lower than
similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 5.6%, , avg exhaust temp (1 20C) is 50%
lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO+ CO2 = 10.
Avg exh flow is higher and exh temp is lower than similar displacement vehicles,
appears different from original run.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 2.7%, avg exhaust temp (100C)is70%
lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 8.3%
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 11.0%, avg exhaust temp (390C) is 80% higher than
similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
avg exhaust temp (110C) is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 4.6
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 8.3
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 7.6
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 8
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.5%
-------
CTR TST ID
C_KS2_780_1
C KS2 782 1
C_KS2_782_2
C KS2 783 1
C_KS2_784_1
C KS2 785 1
C_KS2_787_1
C KS2 788 1
C_KS2_788_2
C_KS2_788_3
C KS2 789 1
C_KS2_791_1
C KS2 792 1
C_KS2_795_1
C KS2 796 1
C_KS2_797_1
C KS2 800 1
C_KS2_801_1
C KS2 802 1
C_KS2_805_1
C_KS2_805_2
C_KS2_806_1
C KS2 807 1
C_KS2_808_1
C_KS2_809_1
C_KS2_809_2
C_KS2_811_1
C KS2 813 1
C_KS2_815_1
C KS2 816 1
C_KS2_818_1
C KS2 820 1
C_KS2_821_1
C KS2 821 2
C_KS2_822_1
C KS2 823 1
C_KS2_824_1
C KS2 825 1
C_KS2_826_1
C KS2 826 2
C_KS2_827_1
C KS2 827 2
C_KS2_828_1
C KS2 829 1
C_KS2_829_2
C_KS2_829_3
C KS2 830 1
C_KS2_833_1
C KS2 834 1
C_KS2_835_1
C KS2 836 1
C KS2 836 2
Disp
5.7
3.3
3.3
2.5
2.3
3
1.3
2.5
2.5
2.5
3.7
2.2
4.2
5
2
2.5
3.3
3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.5
1.9
4
3.5
3.5
3.9
2
4.3
2.2
3.1
3.8
2.5
2.5
4.5
3.1
4.3
3
5.3
5.3
3.3
3.3
5
3
3
3
2
2.3
1.6
2.5
2
2
Disp Bin
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
0 to 1.6
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
Make
CHEVROLET
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
FORD
FORD
VW
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
PLYMOUTH
DODGE
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
FORD
HONDA
ACURA
OLDSMOBILE
PLYMOUTH
VOLVO
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
FORD
NISSAN
NISSAN
DODGE
HONDA
GMC
NISSAN
CHEVROLET
BUICK
CHRYSLER
CHRYSLER
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
DODGE
FORD
FORD
BUICK
BUICK
FORD
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
MERCURY
TOYOTA
DODGE
HONDA
HONDA
Model
SUBURBAN
VOYAGER
VOYAGER
VOYAGER
RANGER XL
RANGER
BEETLE
ACCLAIM
ACCLAIM
ACCLAIM
RAM PICKU
CAMRY
TRAIL BLAZ
CROWN VIC
ACCORD S!
2.5 TL
CUTLASS
VOYAGER S
740 TURBO
CAVALIER
CAVALIER
SPIRIT
ESCORT
EXPLORER
PATHFINDE
PATHFINDE
SE DAKOTA
ACCORD L)
SONOMA
PICKUP
LUMINAAP'
PARK AVEIx
LEBARON
LEBARON
ELDORADO
LUMINA
ASTROVAN
CARAVAN £
F250 PICKU
F250 PICKU
CENTURY
CENTURY
F-150
PICKUP
PICKUP
PICKUP
CORSICA
TOPAZ
TERCEL SR
SPIRIT
ACCORD
ACCORD
Model Year
1997
1999
1999
1992
1992
1992
1973
1989
1989
1989
1987
1999
2002
1989
1989
1996
1990
1988
1987
1995
1995
1989
1987
1994
2001
2001
1987
1988
1995
1988
1990
1990
1988
1988
1990
1990
1989
1988
1982
1982
1990
1990
1988
1989
1989
1989
1989
1989
1983
1990
1988
1988
Missing Flow
Test Date data Flag
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/14/2005
3/9/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005 x
3/10/2005
3/10/2005 x
3/10/2005 x
3/10/2005
3/11/2005
3/12/2005 x
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/16/2005 x
3/16/2005
3/15/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005 x
3/15/2005
3/15/2005 x
3/15/2005
3/15/2005 x
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/29/2005
3/30/2005 x
Dilution
Flag
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.5%, avg exhaust temp (130C) is 40% lower than
similar displacement vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp ( 350C) is 100% higher than similar displacement vehicles
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 7.1%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 7.1%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 0 % (no sampling), avg exhaust temp (100C) is 60%
lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.5%
avg exhaust temp (140C) is 40% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Test record has missing or invalid data
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, avg exhaust temp (130C) is 50% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, avg exhaust temp (130C) is 30% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.0%, avg exhaust temp (410C) is 80% higher than
similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 =
No exhaust flow measured
Suspect dilution: Avg CO+ CO2 = 10.
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.1%
Test record has missing or invalid data
avg exhaust temp (380C) is 70% higher than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, avg exhaust temp (40C) is 80% lower than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 =
Test record has missing or invalid data
-------
CTR TST ID
C_KS2_837_1
C KS2 838 1
C_KS2_839_1
C KS2 840 1
C_KS2_842_1
C_KS2_844_1
C KS2 846 1
C_KS2_846_2
C KS2 848 1
C_KS2_849_1
C KS2 850 1
C_KS2_851_1
C KS2 855 1
C_KS2_856_1
C KS2 856 2
C_KS2_857_1
C KS2 858 1
C_KS2_859_1
C KS2 862 1
C_KS2_862_2
C KS2 866 1
C_KS2_867_1
C KS2 868 1
C_KS2_870_1
C KS2 870 2
C_KS2_871_1
C KS2 872 1
C_KS2_873_1
C KS2 875 1
C_KS2_876_1
C KS2 876 2
C_KS2_877_1
C KS2 878 1
C_KS2_878_2
C KS2 881 1
C_KS2_883_1
C KS2 885 1
C_KS2_887_1
C KS2 888 1
C_KS2_889_1
C KS2 891 1
C_KS2_894_1
C KS2 894 2
C_KS2_895_1
C KS2 897 1
C_KS2_898_1
C_KS2_901_1
C_KS2_902_1
C KS2 903 1
C_KS2_905_1
C KS2 906 1
C_KS2_910_1
C KS2 911 1
C_KS2_915_1
C KS2 916 1
C_KS2_917_1
C KS2 918 1
C KS2 918 2
Disp
6.6
3.8
5
5
2.2
5
5
5
5.7
4.9
2.9
4.9
2.5
2.8
2.8
4.1
5
2.8
4.3
4.3
5
6.5
2.4
5
5
4.1
5.7
4.9
3.8
5.7
5.7
2.8
3.8
3.8
2.3
5
1.9
2.3
1.6
2.2
1.6
5
5
3.1
4.2
2.2
3.3
3.3
3
2.2
3
5.7
2.5
1.5
5
4.9
2
2
Disp Bin
>6.0
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
>6.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
5.1 to 6.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
5.1 to 6.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.1 to 2.5
0 to 1.6
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0
Make
PONTIAC
OLDSMOBILE
GMC
FORD
TOYOTA
CADILLAC
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
FORD
TOYOTA
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
FORD
BUICK
GMC
GMC
CHEVROLET
FORD
TOYOTA
OLDSMOBILE
OLDSMOBILE
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
DODGE
DODGE
FORD
CHEVROLET
SATURN
FORD
VW
MAZDA
MAZDA
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
OLDSMOBILE
JEEP
CHEVROLET
OLDSMOBILE
FORD
FORD
TOYOTA
FORD
PONTIAC
CHEVROLET
HONDA
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
FORD
Model
FIREBIRD
DELTA 88
VANDURA
BRONCO
PICKUP
FLEETWOO
CHEYENNE
CHEYENNE
ELCAMINO
F-150
RANGER
F-150
CAMRY
CUTLASS
CUTLASS
C-10
F-150
CENTURY
JIMMY
JIMMY
CAPRICE
F-150
PICKUP 4X'
CUTLASS S
CUTLASS S
NOVA
IMPALA
F-150
MALIBU
G20 VAN
G20 VAN
BLAZER 4X
CARAVAN E
CARAVAN E
RANGER XL
MONTE CAF
STATION W
MUSTANG
THING
B2200
PROTEGE
SILVERADO
SILVER ADC
CUTLASS
CJ-7
CAVALIER
CUTLASS C
GRANADA
AEROSTAR
CAMRY
ESCAPE
GRAND PRI
CELEBRITY
CIVIC
VAN 20
F 100 RANG
ESCORT
ESCORT
Model Year
1979
1991
1983
1990
1983
1989
1973
1973
1976
1986
1990
1988
1990
1989
1989
1983
1988
1988
1992
1992
1985
1978
1987
1987
1987
1976
1973
1990
1980
1989
1989
1987
2003
2003
1989
1984
1994
1979
1974
1988
1999
1989
1989
1990
1979
1991
1990
1982
1990
2001
2002
1976
1984
1990
1986
1978
1998
1998
Missing Flow
Test Date data Flag
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005 x
3/17/2005 x
3/17/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/19/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/21/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005 x
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
4/1/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
3/28/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/29/2005
3/29/2005
4/1/2005
4/1/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005 x
4/2/2005 x
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Avg exhaust temp (470C) is 70% higher than similar displacement vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp (470C) is 70% higher than similar displacement vehicles.
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles, Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.8%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 7.1%
Suspect dilution: AvgCO + CO2 = 10.7%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.0%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.5%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.9'
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.2%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.8%
Avg exhaust temp (490C) is 70% higher than similar displacement vehicles.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.0%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO+ CO2 = 11.0'
Suspect dilution: Avg CO+ CO2 = 10.
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.1%, avg exhaust temp (400C) is 70% higher than
similar displacement vehicles.
erroneous ambienttemp (average of-38C)
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.3%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 7.1%
Test record has missing or invalid data
Test record has missing or invalid data
-------
CTR TST ID
C_KS2_918_3
C KS2 922 1
C_KS2_923_1
C KS2 924 1
C_KS2_925_1
C KS2 926 1
C_KS2_927_1
C KS2 927 2
C_KS2_928_1
C KS2 929 1
C_KS2_929_2
C KS2 930 1
C_KS2_935_1
C KS2 937 1
C_KS2_937_2
C KS2 939 1
C KS2 941 1
C_KS2_944_1
C KS2 945 1
C_KS2_946_1
C KS2 950 1
C_KS2_984_1
C KS2 985 1
C_KS2_986_1
C KS2 987 1
C_KS2_989_1
C KS2 989 2
C_KS2_1013_1
C_KS2_1014_1
Disp
2
5.7
3
2
3.3
4.9
4.3
4.3
3.3
5.7
5.7
3.4
4.9
3
3
3
3.3
4.3
3.3
2.5
5
2.4
3.3
3
4
3.3
3.3
3
4.6
Disp Bin
1.6 to 2.0
5.1 to 6.0
2.6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
5.1 to 6.0
5.1 to 6.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
3.5 to 4.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
4.1 to 5.0
Make
FORD
CHEVROLET
FORD
FORD
DODGE
FORD
CHEV
CHEV
DODGE
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
TOYOTA
FORD
DODGE
DODGE
CHEVROLET
PLYMOUTH
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
JEEP
FORD
DODGE
DODGE
TOYOTA
FORD
DODGE
DODGE
TOYOTA
MERCURY
Model
ESCORT
BEAUVILLE
ESCAPE
FOCUS
CARAVAN £
F-150XL
ASTRO VAh
ASTRO VAh
GRAND CAF
SUBURBAN
SUBURBAN
FORERUNN
F-250
CARAVAN
CARAVAN
ASTROVAN
VOYAGER
BLAZER 4X.
VOYAGER
CHEROKEE
CLUBWAGI
STRATUS
INTREPID
AVALON
EXPLORER
GRAND CAF
GRAND CAF
CAMRY
GRAND MAI
Model Year
1998
1979
2005
2005
1992
1995
1994
1994
2000
1997
1997
1998
1995
1995
1995
1992
1992
1993
2002
1996
1989
1999
1995
1998
1993
2003
2003
1994
1994
Missing Flow
Test Date data Flag
4/2/2005
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005 x
4/6/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
AH/2005 x
4/7/2005
4/9/2005 x
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/9/2005
2/7/2005
2/14/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
4/4/2005
4/4/2005
1/19/2005
2/9/2005
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 8.7%, ambient temp error (avg is 60C)
Ambient temp error (avg is 60C)
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: Avg CO +CO2 = 9.9%
Average exhaust flow is > 50% lower than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles
Average exhaust flow is > 50% higher than average for all other similar displacement
vehicles.
Avg exhaust temp (470C) is 70% higherr than similar displacement vehicles.
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix U
Round 2 Driveaway
Quality Control
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
CTR_TST_ID
D KS2 618 1
D KS2 677 1
D KS2 679 1
D_KS2_689_1
D KS2 689 2
D KS2 698 1
D KS2 698 2
D_KS2_703_1
D KS2 704 1
D KS2 705 1
D_KS2_711_1
D KS2 722 1
D KS2 723 1
D KS2 724 1
D_KS2_726_1
D KS2 729 1
D KS2 730 1
D KS2 730 2
D_KS2_734_1
D KS2 735 1
D_KS2_739_1
D KS2 739 2
D KS2 745 1
D KS2 753 1
D KS2 759 1
D_KS2_760_1
D KS2 764 1
D KS2 766 1
D KS2 769 1
D_KS2_770_1
D_KS2_773_1
Disp
4.9
3.4
4
5
5
3.3
3.3
5
4.9
3.7
2.3
2.9
2.3
4.3
4.3
3.8
3
3
3
3.3
3
3
5.4
2
4
1.5
3.1
5.2
1.8
2.5
4.9
Disp Bin
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.1 to 3.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.1 to 2.5
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
3.5 to 4.0
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
2. 6 to 3.0
3.1 to 3.5
2.6 to 3.0
2.6 to 3.0
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.5 to 4.0
0 to 1.6
3.1 to 3.5
5.1 to 6.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2. 5
4.1 to 5.0
Make
BUICK
PONTIAC
FORD
LINCOLN
LINCOLN
CHRYSLER
CHRYSLER
FORD
CADILLAC
DODGE
MERCURY
VOLVO
FORD
CHEVROLET
CHEVROLET
CHRYSLER
FORD
FORD
PLYMOUTH
DODGE
FORD
FORD
FORD
FORD
JEEP
MAZDA
BUICK
JEEP
HONDA
TOYOTA
FORD
Model
LASABRE
MONTANA
RANGER
TOWN CAR
TOWN CAR
TOWN & CO
TOWN & CO
COUNTRY S
SEDAN DEV
DAKOTA
TOPAZ
960
TEMPO
BLAZER
S-10LS
TOWN & CO
RANGER
RANGER
VOYAGER
CARAVAN S
TAURUS
TAURUS
ECONOLINE
WINDSTAR
CHEROKEE
PROTEGE
SKYLARK
GRAND CHE
CIVIC
CAMRY
E-150
Model Year
1979
2003
1998
1988
1988
2001
2001
1986
1992
2004
1994
1993
1993
1996
1995
1996
1994
1994
1993
1995
1993
1993
2001
1998
1988
1998
1998
1993
1999
1989
1991
Missing Flow
Date data Flag
X
2/11/2005
2/12/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
2/25/2005
2/26/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/2/2005
3/5/2005
3/3/2005
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Test record has missing or invalid data
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 11.0%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 2.4%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.9%
Avg exhaust temp (440C) is 70% higherer than similar displacement
vehicles
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.3%
Avg exhaust temp (120C) is 60% lower than similar displacement
vehicles
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.1%
-------
CTR_TST_ID
D KS2 774 1
D KS2 783 1
D KS2 786 1
D_KS2_788_1
D_KS2_791_1
D KS2 792 1
D_KS2_795_1
D KS2 801 1
D KS2 805 1
D KS2 808 1
D_KS2_813_1
D KS2 818 1
D KS2 820 1
D KS2 824 1
D_KS2_825_1
D KS2 830 1
D KS2 835 1
D KS2 836 1
D_KS2_847_1
D_KS2_859_1
D KS2 904 1
D_KS2_910_1
D_KS2_913_1
Disp
3
2.5
4.9
2.5
2.2
4.2
5
3
2.2
4
2
3.1
3.8
4.3
3
2
2.5
2
5.7
2.8
2.5
5.7
3.8
Disp Bin
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
4.1 to 5.0
2.1 to 2. 5
2.1 to 2. 5
4.1 to 5.0
4.1 to 5.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
3.5 to 4.0
1.6 to 2.0
3.1 to 3.5
3.5 to 4.0
4.1 to 5.0
2. 6 to 3.0
1.6 to 2.0
2.1 to 2.5
1.6 to 2.0
5.1 to 6.0
2. 6 to 3.0
2.1 to 2.5
5.1 to 6.0
3.5 to 4.0
Make
NISSAN
PLYMOUTH
FORD
PLYMOUTH
TOYOTA
CHEVROLET
FORD
PLYMOUTH
CHEVROLET
FORD
HONDA
CHEVROLET
BUICK
CHEVROLET
DODGE
CHEVROLET
DODGE
HONDA
CMC
BUICK
SUBARU
PONTIAC
BUICK
Model
QUEST
VOYAGER
ECONOLINE
ACCLAIM
CAMRY
TRAIL BLAZI
CROWN VIC
VOYAGER S
CAVALIER
EXPLORER
ACCORD LX
LUMINAAPX
PARKAVEN
ASTROVAN
CARAVAN S
CORSICA
SPIRIT
ACCORD
1500SLESII
CENTURY
FORESTER
GRAND PRI)
LESABRE
Model Year
1996
1992
1996
1989
1999
2002
1989
1988
1995
1994
1988
1990
1990
1989
1988
1989
1990
1988
1988
1988
2001
1976
1990
Missing Flow
Date data Flag
3/5/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/13/2005
3/14/2005
3/16/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/31/2005
3/18/2005
3/21/2005
3/28/2005
3/30/2005
3/31/2005
Dilution Exh Temp Ambient Suspect
Flag Flag Temp Flag Data
Data Review Comments
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 10.4%
Suspect dilution: Avg CO + CO2 = 9.8%
Avg exhaust temp (430C) is 50% higher than similar displacement
vehicles
erroneous aux temp (not a data issue)
Avg exhaust temp (400C) is 50% higher than similar displacement
vehicles
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix V
Round 2 Dynamometer
Test Issues
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84393 1999 Chrysler 300M
84394 2000 Honda Odyssey
84395 0.00
84396 1995 Ford Escort
84397 1975 Chevrolet Silverado 20 PU
84398 2001 Honda Accord
84399 1997 Honda Accord
84400 0.00
84401 1998 Plymouth Voyager
84402 1991 Honda Civic
84403 2000 Dodge Caravan
84404 1997 Dodge Caravan
84405 0.00
84406 1995 Toyota Corolla
84407 1989PontiacGrandAm
84408 2002 Mercury Sable
84409 1999 Chevrolet Malibu
84410 0.00
84411 1996 Saturn SC
84412 1996 Honda Civic
84413 1979 Ford F250 PU
84414 2003 Chevrolet Impala
84415 1999 Dodge Durango
84416 1998 Honda Civic
84417 0.00
84418 1997 Pontiac Grand Am
84419 1998 Chevrolet Lumina
84420 2000 Honda Accord
84421 2000 Saturn Sedan
84422 1998 Jeep Cherokee
84423 0.00
84424 1995 Ford Explorer
84425 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo
84426 2001 Saturn Sedan
84427 2001 Mitsubishi Galant
84428 1998 Chevrolet Malibu
84429 0.00
84430 1990 Dodge Spirit
84431 1991 Mercury Grand Marquis S/W
84432 1999 Saturn Sedan
84433 1997 Jeep Wrangler
84434 QAZ044
84435 0.00
84436 1995 Chevrolet S10PU
84437 1994 Toyota Camry
84438 2001 Buick Century
84439 1995 Pontiac Bonneville
Odometer
(Miles)
90240
74601
0
106996
2893
62350
82926
0
168876
220022
85198
96455
0
107983
123575
29501
79925
0
78346
140479
5797
11340
95999
118218
0
58100
79187
84180
51721
137053
0
162634
179121
44251
51764
107047
0
93661
19292
98565
97532
0
0
124976
131874
33749
Inertia
(Lbs)
3500
4500
0
2750
4000
3500
3000
0
4000
2500
3500
3500
0
2500
3000
3500
3500
0
2500
2500
3500
3500
5000
2500
0
3000
3500
3500
2750
3500
0
4500
4000
2750
2750
3500
0
3000
4000
2500
3500
Void
0
3500
3500
3500
Hp@50mph
5.8
9.6
0.0
5.6
13.9
7.8
4.9
0.0
7.0
6.5
7.2
7.2
0.0
6.0
5.9
6.8
5.8
0.0
6.0
6.9
10.5
2.9
16.9
5.1
0.0
3.8
5.5
7.5
4.0
11.8
0.0
11.5
13.1
3.7
3.7
5.9
0.0
8.2
10.3
5.5
16.1
0.0
0.0
10.8
7.2
5.3
Time
9:21 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
12:00 AM
1:05 p.m.
2:45 p.m.
9:20 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
12:00 AM
1:28 p.m.
2:58 p.m.
8:45 a.m.
10:27 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
1:04 p.m.
2:23 p.m.
8:29 a.m.
10:40 a.m.
12:00 AM
1:14 p.m.
3:00 p.m.
4:15 p.m.
8:19 a.m.
9:50 a.m.
11:09 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
1:47 p.m.
4:05 p.m.
8:11 a.m.
9:26 a.m.
10:51 a.m.
11: a.m.
1:19 p.m.
2:45 p.m.
8:10 a.m.
9:52 a.m.
11:14a.m.
12 p.m.
1:47 p.m.
3:15 p.m.
8:09 a.m.
9:40 a.m.
10:55 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
1:02 p.m.
2:20 p.m.
8:08 a.m.
Date
01/12/2005
01/12/2005
01/12/2005
01/12/2005
01/12/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/20/2005
01/20/2005
01/20/2005
01/20/2005
01/20/2005
01/20/2005
01/21/2005
Dyne Test Issues
CVS bags not fully evacuated prior to start of test.
Suspect Data
No tunnel heater during Phase 3 of test.
CVS bags not fully evacuated prior to start of test.
Possible high background concentration due to truck running
outside building during Phase 1.
Generator stopped at start of Phase 3, so no tunnel heater during
Phase 3.
Possible high background concentration due to truck running
outside building.
168145
3500
5.3
9:22 a.m. 01/21/2005
CVS bags not fully evacuated prior to start of test.
Possible high background concentration due to oil burning on
exhaust system.
Real-time computer rebooted 850 seconds into test.
Possible drive trace violations due to bad brakes.
Possible high background concentration due to oil burning on
exhaust system.
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84440 1995 Buick Park Avenue
84441 0.00
84442 1994 Toyota Camry
84443 1991 GeoPrizm
84444 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
84445 2001 Saturn Sedan
84446 2000 Toyota Sienna
84447 0.00
84448 1999 Plymouth Voyager
84449 1994 Buick Regal
84450 1988 Ford Taurus
84451 1994 Buick Regal
84452 1995 Ford Taurus
84453 1995 Nissan Maxima
84454 0.00
84455 1995 Ford Mustang
84456 1993 Pontiac Grand Prix
84457 1995 Ford Crown Vic
84458 1993 Ford Aerostar
84459 1992 Ford Aerostar
84460 0.00
84461 1988 Ford Taurus
84462 1989 Plymouth Voyager
84463 1995 Ford Contour
84464 1994 Dodge Intrepid
84465 1994 Chevrolet Lumina APV
84466 0.00
84467 1988 Ford Ranger PU
84468 1994 Chevrolet Lumina APV
84469 1989 Dodge Caravan
84470 1973 Mercedes 280 S E
84471 0.00
84472 1977 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
84473 1996 Ford Explorer
84474 1988 Honda Civic
84475 1986 Ford Tempo
84476 0.00
84477 1989 Dodge Ram 50
84478 1996 Dodge Neon
84479 1996 Dodge Caravan
84480 1988 Ford Taurus
84481 0.00
84482 1979 Buick Lasabre
84483 1996 Dodge Neon
84484 1979 Buick Lesabre
84485 1991 Cadillac Fleetwood
84486 0.00
84487 1992 Mazda B2200 PU
84488 1995 Buick Lesabre
Idometer
144956
0
131894
132326
29519
67290
137493
0
79230
92177
13729
92214
139316
181395
0
146289
177931
179731
147319
164560
0
13748
145307
104083
145950
124172
0
77528
124200
Inertia
4000
0
3500
2500
3000
3000
4000
0
4000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
0
3500
3500
4000
3500
3500
0
3500
3500
3000
3500
4000
0
3500
4000
Hp@50mph
7.2
0.0
7.2
7.4
12.7
6.4
6.5
0.0
6.4
5.6
4.0
5.6
6.5
6.5
0.0
7.5
5.0
8.5
11.1
11.4
0.0
4.0
7.6
5.0
5.1
8.9
0.0
10.2
8.9
Time
10:39 a.m.
11:15 a.m.
1:20 p.m.
2:27 p.m.
8:10 a.m.
9:39 a.m.
10:56 a.m.
11:39 a.m.
1:25 p.m.
2:40 p.m.
4:00 p.m.
8:22 a.m.
9:44 a.m.
10:57 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
1:15 p.m.
2:35 p.m.
8:20 a.m.
9:32 a.m.
10:50 a.m.
11:45 a.m.
1:11 p.m.
2:25 p.m.
8:15 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:50 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
8:18 a.m.
Date
01/21/2005
01/21/2005
01/21/2005
01/21/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/26/2005
01/26/2005
01/26/2005
01/26/2005
01/26/2005
01/26/2005
01/27/2005
01/27/2005
01/27/2005
01/27/2005
01/27/2005
01/28/2005
Dyne Test Issues
Possible high background concentration due to oil burning on
exhaust system.
Suspect Data
162878
3500
7.6
10:00 a.m. 01/28/2005
86134
0
36999
109593
207265
70396
0
133981
79839
118369
13768
0
40364
79848
40385
97124
0
101090
126036
4000
0
4000
4500
2250
2500
0
3500
2500
4000
3500
0
3500
2500
3500
4000
0
3000
3500
11.4
0.0
11.6
11.8
6.4
6.9
0.0
15.0
7.2
7.2
4.0
0.0
10.5
7.2
10.5
6.9
0.0
10.7
7.1
11:10 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
8:15 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:40 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
1:45 p.m.
8:20a.m.
9:22 a.m.
10:42 a.m.
12:00 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
8:10 a.m.
9:24 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
1:40 p.m.
8:10 a.m.
01/28/2005
01/28/2005
01/28/2005
01/29/2005
01/29/2005
01/29/2005
01/29/2005
01/29/2005
01/31/2005
01/31/2005
01/31/2005
01/31/2005
01/31/2005
02/01/2005
02/01/2005
02/01/2005
02/01/2005
02/01/2005
02/02/2005
Possible dilution due to exhaust leak.
Loading suspect due to excessive PAU dyno noise.
Loading suspect due to excessive PAU dyno noise.
NOx reading suspect due to NOx drift.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
No NOx data for Phase 3.
Possible drive trace violations.
Possible high background concentration due to oil burning on
exhaust system.
Real-time instruments saturated. Background HC readings
suspect due to cell saturation., Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Vehicle stalled during Phase 2.
Possible drive trace violations.
Realtime computer failed during test.
Possible high background concentrations due to building
evacuation fan being turned off.
Possible drive trace violations during Phase 3.
Tedlar bags not evacuated prior to test.
-------
Run#
84489
84490
84491
84492
84493
84494
84495
84496
84497
84498
84499
84500
84501
84502
84503
84504
84505
84506
84507
84508
84509
84510
84511
84512
84513
84514
84515
84516
84517
84518
84519
84520
84521
84522
84523
84524
84525
84526
84527
84528
84529
84530
84531
84532
84533
84534
84535
Veh Yr, Make, Model
1987 Toyota PU
1991 Cadillac Fleetwood
0.00
1984 Chevy C-10 Silverado
2004 Ford Freestar Minivan
1997 Ford Ranger PU
1 996 GMC Sonoma PU
0.00
1995 Toyota 4 Runner
2001 Toyota Sienna
1995 Acura Integra
1998 Nissan Frontier PU
0.00
1996 Chrysler Concorde
2002 Ford Taurus
2000 Chrysler Concorde
1993 Dodge Intrepid
0.00
1988 Ford Taurus
1992 Honda Civic
1992 Chevrolet Astrovan
1994 Chevrolet Suburban
0.00
1982 Chevrolet Caprice
0.00
2002 Chrysler Concorde
1999 Dodge Stratus
0.00
1998 Dodge Caravan
1994 Buick Skylark
1992 Dodge Caravan
2001 Ford Taurus
1997 Honda Accord
1996 Chevrolet 1 500 PU
0.00
1995lsuzuPU
1993 CHEVROLET ASTRO, VUE539
1991 Lincoln Towncar
1995 Dodge Ram 1 500 PU
1994 Mercury Grand Marquis
1993 Plymouth Sundance
0.00
1992 Geo Tracker
2003 Pontiac Montana
1999 Chevrolet Suburban
1993 Subaru Legacy
0.00
Odometer
232098
97144
0
82259
14714
118470
51863
0
85898
59734
80579
112521
0
111502
26406
65330
210298
0
13788
124705
217165
187410
0
88587
VOID
34231
108838
0
80989
20081 1
213493
47479
101888
46711
0
87225
0
188033
93425
130521
84652
0
48704
49337
88900
114227
0
Inertia
2750
4000
0
4000
4500
3500
3000
0
4000
4000
2750
3500
0
3500
4000
3000
3500
0
3500
2250
4000
5500
0
4000
0
3500
3000
0
4000
3000
3500
3500
3000
4000
0
3000
0
4000
4000
4000
2750
0
2750
4500
5000
3500
0
Hp@50mph
9.6
6.9
0.0
15.2
10.0
10.9
9.2
0.0
12.9
10.0
7.2
11.0
0.0
7.7
8.0
11.3
6.8
0.0
4.0
4.6
12.5
10.8
0.0
4.6
0.0
7.8
5.5
0.0
7.9
5.4
8.0
6.8
4.9
12.2
0.0
12.0
0.0
7.1
15.0
10.7
6.3
0.0
14.5
10.1
12.5
9.0
0.0
Time
9:33 a.m.
10:50 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
1:25 p.m.
8:36 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
1:44 p.m.
8:23 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:57 a.m.
12:10 p.m.
1:40 p.m.
8:20 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:52 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
8:19 a.m.
9:40 a.m.
10:50 a.m.
11:25 a.m.
1:24 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
8:49 a.m.
10:06 a.m.
12:38 p.m.
12:38 p.m.
1:52 p.m.
3:07 p.m.
8:30 a.m.
9:44 a.m.
10:58 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
3:10 p.m.
8:21 a.m.
9:38 a.m.
10:53 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
1:28 p.m.
8:09 a.m.
9:26 a.m.
10:44 a.m.
11:55 a.m.
Date
02/02/2005
02/02/2005
02/02/2005
02/02/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/04/2005
02/04/2005
02/04/2005
02/04/2005
02/04/2005
02/05/2005
02/05/2005
02/05/2005
02/05/2005
02/05/2005
02/07/2005
02/07/2005
02/07/2005
02/07/2005
02/07/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/10/2005
02/10/2005
02/10/2005
02/10/2005
02/10/2005
02/11/2005
02/11/2005
02/11/2005
02/11/2005
Dyne Test Issues
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Suspect Data
2.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Vehicle stalled during Phase 2.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible high background concentrations due to smoke, HC and
CO instruments pegged.
Voided run
Possible high background concentrations due to diesel truck
running outside.
Voided run
Invalid RH value (battery in hygrometer dead), used airport data
Invalid RH value (battery in hygrometer dead), used airport data
Possible dilution due to tailpipe disconnect at 1000 seconds into
test. Invalid RH value (battery in hygrometer dead)., used airport
data
-------
Run#
Veh Yr, Make, Model
Odometer
Inertia
Hp@50mph
Time
Date
Dyne Test Issues
Suspect Data
84536 1988 Ford Taurus
84537 2000 Jeep Cherokee
84538 1998 Ford Ranger PU
84539 1996 Chevrolet Tahoe
84540 0.00
84541 1996 Dodge Caravan
84542 1996 Dodge Caravan
84543 2000 Jeep Cherokee
84544 1988 Ford Taurus
84545 0.00
84546 1999 Dodge Dakota PU
84547 1995 Toyota Corolla
84548 1995 Dodge Intrepid
84549 0.00
84550 1988 Lincoln Continental
84551 2002 Isuzu Axiom
84552 2002 Oldsmobile Silouette
84553 2002 Dodge Durango
84554 1992 Ford F50 PU
84555 0.00
84556 2001 Chrysler Town & Country
84557 2000 Buick Park Avenue
84558 2001 Chevrolet S-10PU
84559 0.00
84560 1998 Dodge Dakota Sport
84561 86 Ford Crown Victoria SW
84562 2004 Dodge Dakota PU
84563 2003 Ford Ranger 4X4 PU
84564 1998 Dodge Caravan
84565 0.00
84566 1995 Honda Odyssey
84567 1992 Cadillac Sedan De-Ville
84568 1999 Ford Ranger PU
84569 1995 Ford Taurus
84570 1994 Chevrolet S10PU
84571 0.00
84572 1994 Mercu ry Topaz
84573 1993 Buick Park Avenue
84574 1993 Ford Taurus
84575 1994 Chevrolet Lumina
84576 0.00
84577 1998 Ford Aerostar
84578 1988 Ford Taurus
84579 0.00
84580 2002 Chrysler Town& Country
84581 1995 Chevrolet Corsica
84582 1988BMW528e
84583 0.00
84584 1995 Nissan PU
84585 1993 Ford Escort SW
13809
88513
48208
69010
0
161280
161308
88541
13828
0
64155
103068
138989
0
31667
46363
61168
VOID
134791
0
75545
67099
106236
0
49775
54310
8627
18757
127230
0
109044
155895
126851
203067
63902
0
41482
74444
39476
126825
0
0
13871
0
84580
78767
287806
0
86705
99988
3500
3500
3500
4500
0
4000
4000
3500
3500
0
3500
2750
3500
0
4000
4000
4000
0
4500
0
4500
4000
4000
0
3500
3500
4000
3500
4000
0
3500
4000
3500
3500
3000
0
2750
4000
3500
3500
0
4000
3500
0
4500
3000
3500
0
3500
2750
4.0
12.5
11.7
12.5
0.0
7.2
7.2
12.5
4.0
0.0
9.6
6.0
5.9
0.0
8.3
13.4
9.2
0.0
14.6
0.0
8.4
6.6
9.8
0.0
11.2
9.0
12.6
11.5
7.9
0.0
9.8
6.9
9.0
5.4
9.8
0.0
7.0
6.1
5.5
5.4
0.0
7.9
4.0
0.0
11.1
5.9
10.7
0.0
12.0
6.6
1:10 p.m.
8:10 a.m.
9:23 a.m.
10:37 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
1:19 p.m.
8:25 a.m.
9:43 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
12:40 p.m.
8:04 a.m.
9:18 a.m.
10:41 a.m.
12:15 p.m.
1:08 p.m.
8:06 a.m.
9:20 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
10:48 a.m.
11:55 a.m.
8:09 a.m.
9:20 a.m.
10:28 a.m.
11:32 a.m.
12:46 p.m.
1:59 p.m.
8:02 a.m.
9:16a.m.
10:27 a.m.
11:32 a.m.
12:43 p.m.
1:54 p.m.
8:08 a.m.
9:20 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
10:35 a.m.
1:14 p.m.
8:20 a.m.
9:39 a.m.
10:48 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
8:15 a.m.
9:15 a.m.
12:00 a.m.
8:19 a.m.
9:45 a.m.
11:12 a.m.
12:00 a.m.
8:16 a.m.
9:20 a.m.
02/11/2005
02/12/2005
02/12/2005
02/12/2005
02/12/2005
02/12/2005
02/14/2005
02/14/2005
02/14/2005
02/14/2005
02/15/2005
02/15/2005
02/15/2005
02/15/2005
02/15/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/19/2005
02/19/2005
02/19/2005
02/19/2005
02/19/2005
02/21/2005
02/21/2005
02/21/2005
02/21/2005
02/22/2005
02/22/2005
02/22/2005
02/23/2005
02/23/2005
02/23/2005
02/23/2005
02/24/2005
02/24/2005
Bags inadvertently evacuated during Phases 1 and 2. Invalid RH
value (battery in hygrometer dead), used airport data.
HC2 malfunction during Phase III.
Voided run
Numerous restarts during test.
No Phase 3 data.
Voided run
Traction control problem at 180 seconds into test.
-------
Run#
84586
84587
84588
84589
84590
84591
84592
84593
84594
84595
84596
84597
84598
84599
84600
84601
84602
84603
84604
84605
84606
84607
84608
84609
84610
84611
84612
84613
84614
84615
84616
84617
84618
84619
84620
84621
84622
84623
84624
84625
84626
84627
84628
84629
84630
84631
84632
84633
84634
Veh Yr, Make, Model
0.00
1996 Mercury Villager
1978 Buick Regal
2001 Saturn
0.00
1993 Toyota 4Runner
1979 Ford LTD
1998 Honda Accord
0.00
1988 Ford Escort
1997 Ford Taurus
1994 Pontiac Sunbird
0.00
1 998 Toyota Avalon
1993 Ford Explorer
1979 Buick Regal
0.00
1979 Nissan Datsun 210 Wagon
0.00
1977 Nissan 280Z
1988 Ford Taurus
0.00
1996 Nissan Quest
1978 Buick Regal
0.00
1989 Toyota Camry
2000 Ford Ranger PU
1 990 Oldsmobile Delta 88
1 978 Oldsmobile Delta 88
0.00
1999 Plymouth Voyager
1997 Chevrolet Suburban
1992 Plymouth Voyager
0.00
1992 Ford Ranger PU
1992 Ford Ranger PU
1999 Toyota Camry
1989 Plymouth Acclaim
1988 Ford Taurus
0.00
!987 Dodge D1 00 PU
1987 Ford F1 50 PU
2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer
1996AcuraTL2.5
1989 Honda Accord
0.00
1987 Ford F1 50 PU
1987 Volvo 740 Turbo
1988 Plymouth Voyager
Odometer
0
166799
81379
56662
0
178462
65850
75067
0
133085
97601
145869
0
29575
47980
5864
0
47114
0
94782
13936
0
125651
64571
0
168091
33680
185694
73729
0
113389
145147
154297
0
19758
13586
64134
164203
14013
0
23200
410
77758
117642
139963
0
428
248178
162874
Inertia
0
4000
4000
2750
0
4000
4000
3000
0
2750
3500
2750
0
3500
4000
3500
0
2500
0
3000
3500
0
4000
3500
0
3500
3500
3500
4000
0
4000
5500
4000
0
3500
3500
3500
3000
3500
0
3500
4000
4500
3500
2750
0
4000
3000
4000
Hp@50mph
0.0
7.9
9.9
6.1
0.0
12.9
10.7
4.0
0.0
6.0
6.7
5.2
0.0
5.8
10.2
11.8
0.0
9.8
0.0
9.9
4.0
0.0
10.0
10.8
0.0
8.4
12.0
6.8
8.7
0.0
7.2
11.2
7.5
0.0
11.3
11.1
6.4
6.9
4.0
0.0
13.2
10.4
10.0
8.1
6.0
0.0
13.9
9.9
7.8
Time
12:00 p.m.
8:54 a.m.
10:12 a.m.
11:25 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
8:12 a.m.
9:26 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
8:33 a.m.
9:50 a.m.
11:08 a.m.
12:15 p.m.
8:15 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:40 a.m.
12:00 p.m.
8:30 a.m.
10:00 a.m.
10:14 a.m.
11:36 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
8:09 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
11:49 a.m.
8:06 a.m.
9:28 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
8:07 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
11:45 a.m.
1:00 p.m.
2:15 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
10:41 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
1:05 p.m.
2:25 p.m.
8:06 a.m.
9:25 a.m.
10:40 a.m.
12:00 PM
1:30 p.m.
8:10 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
Date
02/24/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/26/2005
02/26/2005
02/26/2005
02/26/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/02/2005
03/02/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/03/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/05/2005
03/05/2005
03/05/2005
03/05/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/08/2005
03/08/2005
03/08/2005
03/08/2005
03/08/2005
03/08/2005
03/09/2005
03/09/2005
03/09/2005
03/09/2005
03/09/2005
03/10/2005
03/10/2005
Dyne Test Issues
Suspect Data
Possible drive trace violations due to bad brakes.
NOx reading suspect due to short NOx warmup prior to test. O3
generator not working.
Vehicle stalled 30 seconds into test.
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Vehicle stalled several times during Phase 1. Possible dilution
due to exhaust leaks.
Torque board dislodged during Phase 2. Reinserted for Phase 3.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. Vehicle stalled several
times during Phase 1.
No bag CO2 value for Phase 3.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking). Phase 2 dilution temp
over 50C.
Possible drive trace violations (braking). Phase 2 dilution temp
over 50C.
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84635 1989 Ford Crown Vic
84636 0.00
84637 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
84638 1996 Chrysler Town & Country
84639 1995 Cheverolet Cavalier
84640 1994 Ford Explorer
84641 0.00
84642 1989 Dodge Spirit
84643 1987 Ford Escort
84644 2001 Nissan Pathfinder
84645 1993 Volvo 960
84646 1988 Honda Accord
84647 0.00
84648 1987 Dodge Dakota PU
84649 1995 GMC Sonoma PU
84650 1990 Chevrolet Lumina APV
84651 1988 Ford Taurus
84652 0.00
84653 1977 Chevrolet C-20 PU
84654 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cierra
84655 1990 Buick Electra Park Avenue
84656 1990 Chevrolet Lumina APV
84657 0.00
84658 1989 Chevrolet Astrovan
84659 1988 Ch rysler Le Baron
84660 1988 Dodge Caravan
84661 1990 Buick Century
84662 1990 Cadillac Eldorado
Odometer
62847
0
79420
213656
140500
98974
0
139488
12845
66284
197094
209194
0
112838
56578
136313
14033
0
37697
97522
169860
123632
0
215908
117003
61439
148959
Inertia
3500
0
3500
4000
2750
4000
0
3000
2500
4000
3500
2750
0
3500
3500
3500
3500
0
4000
3000
3500
3500
0
3500
3000
3500
3000
Hp@50mph
11.0
0.0
10.5
8.5
4.8
10.6
0.0
8.4
7.4
15.3
10.3
6.4
0.0
10.6
9.8
8.1
4.0
0.0
13.9
5.4
6.3
8.1
0.0
12.0
8.3
8.0
6.8
Time
10:38 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
1:10 p.m.
8:09 a.m.
9:20 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
1:01 p.m.
2:10 p.m.
8:02 a.m.
9:14 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
1:00 p.m.
8:17 a.m.
9:35 a.m.
10:40 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
1:07 p.m.
8:05 a.m.
9:12 a.m.
10:21 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
1:12 p.m.
1:52 p.m.
3:07 p.m.
8:10 a.m.
Date
03/10/2005
03/10/2005
03/10/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/12/2005
03/12/2005
03/12/2005
03/12/2005
03/12/2005
03/14/2005
03/14/2005
03/14/2005
03/14/2005
03/14/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/16/2005
185384
3500
6.2
9:17 a.m. 03/16/2005
84663
84664
84665
84666
84667
84668
84669
84670
84671
84672
84673
84674
84675
84676
84677
84678
84679
1989 Chevrolet Corsica
0.00
1989 Toyota 4X4 PU
1988 Ford F1 50 PU
1982 FordF250PU
1991 Oldsmobile Delta 88
1990 Dodge Spirit
1989 Mercury Topaz
0.00
1983 Toyota Tercel
1983 GMC Vandura
1979 Pontiac Firebird
1993 Ford Tempo
1990 Ford Bronco
1988 Buick Park Avenue
0.00
1983 Toyota PU
98999
0
262316
14075
85513
139412
109931
6137
0
87900
52728
45370
25053
25202
146833
0
97635
3000
0
3500
4000
3500
3500
3000
2750
0
2250
4500
4000
2750
4500
3500
0
3000
5.3
0.0
10.9
14.6
11.9
7.0
8.7
6.6
0.0
6.7
16.2
10.8
6.1
13.3
6.3
0.0
9.9
10:31 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
1:17 p.m.
2:08 p.m.
3:19 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
9:09 a.m.
10:24 a.m.
11:22 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
10:30 a.m.
3:04 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
9:44 a.m.
10:23 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:39 p.m.
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/17/2005
03/17/2005
03/17/2005
03/17/2005
03/17/2005
03/17/2005
03/17/2005
03/18/2005
03/18/2005
03/18/2005
03/18/2005
03/18/2005
Dyne Test Issues
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Suspect Data
84680
1973 Chevrolet PU
57484
4000
12.6
1:50 p.m. 03/18/2005
Possible dilution due to exhaust leak.
Background HC reading suspect due to instrument drift.
Background HC reading suspect due to instrument drift.
Vehicle stalled several times during Phase 1. Phase 2 dilution
temp over 50C.
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Real-time computer had internal error during soak.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leak, possible high background
concentrations.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leak, possible high background
concentrations.
Possible high background concentrations due to oil burning on
exhaust.
Vehicle stalled several times during test. Possible high
background concentrations and dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Possible high background concentrations due to another vehicle
being operated in building during test.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Possible drive trace violations (max speed of vehicle is 50 mph).
Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. Phase 2 dilution temp
over 50C.
-------
84686 1986 Ford F150 PU 94737 3500
84687 1976 Chevrolet El Camino 61809 4000
84688 1993 Ford Taurus 92978 3500
84689 1992 GMC Jimmy 90871 3500
84690 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cierra 220970 3000
84691 0.00 0 0
84692 1988 Buick Century 94555 3000
84693 1988 Ford F150 PU 97172 4000
84694 1983 Chevrolet C10PU 98799 3500
84695 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera 220989 3000
84696 1987 Toyota PU 169293 2750
84697 1988 Ford Taurus 14052 3500
84698 0.00 0 0
84699 1985 Chevrolet Caprice 58223 3500
84700 1978 Ford PU 73447 4000
84701 1990 Ford F150 PU 38803 4000
84702 1989 Chevrolet G20 Van 27435 4000
84703 1987 Chevrolet Blazer 153398 3500
84704 0.00 0 0
84705 1980 Chevrolet Malibu 31253 3500
84706 1776 Chevrolet Nova/144MGX 86094 3500
84707 1973 Chevrolet Impala 94178 4000
84708 2003 Dodge Caravan 10200 4000
84709 1989 Ford Ranger PU 28864 3000
84710 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 68810 3500
84711 0.00 0 0
84712 1979 Chevrolet Nova 86117 3500
84713 1996 Chevrolet Blazer 94350 4000
84714 1994 Saturn SW 132333 2500
84715 1988 Mazda B2200 PU 220307 3000
84716 0.00 0 0
84717 1979 Ford Mustang 45551 3000
84718 QBI692 0 0
84719 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 85449 3500
84720 1989 Chevrolet 1500 PU 140678 4000
84721 0.00 0 0
84722 1998 Ford Windstar 99476 4000
84723 1991 Chevrolet Cavalier 182349 2750
84724 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera 171475 3000
84725 0.00 0 0
84726 1990 Ford Aerostar 19648 3500
Hp@50mph
6.1
9.0
11.1
0.0
13.5
12.5
12.1
9.5
9.5
5.4
0.0
6.4
14.6
14.0
5.4
9.6
4.0
0.0
8.7
11.7
13.5
16.2
9.8
0.0
9.5
9.6
11.4
7.2
11.1
10.6
0.0
9.6
10.7
6.1
10.6
0.0
9.7
0.0
4.5
12.8
0.0
7.9
5.8
5.4
0.0
10.3
Time
8:12 a.m.
9:25 a.m.
10:35 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
1:14 p.m.
2:22 p.m.
3:14 p.m.
8:05 a.m.
9:21 a.m.
10:31 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:48 p.m.
1:59 p.m.
3:09 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
9:16 a.m.
10:25 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:46 p.m.
2:08 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
9:14 a.m.
10:26 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:39 p.m.
1:51 p.m.
2:31 p.m.
8:27 a.m.
10:02 a.m.
11:17a.m.
12:30 p.m.
1:49 p.m.
8:07 a.m.
9:16 a.m.
10:15 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
1:58 p.m.
8:07 a.m.
9:14 a.m.
10:21 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
8:07 a.m.
9:19 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
12:45 p.m.
Date
03/19/2005
03/19/2005
03/19/2005
03/19/2005
03/19/2005
03/19/2005
03/19/2005
03/21/2005
03/21/2005
03/21/2005
03/21/2005
03/21/2005
03/21/2005
03/21/2005
03/22/2005
03/22/2005
03/22/2005
03/22/2005
03/22/2005
03/22/2005
03/23/2005
03/23/2005
03/23/2005
03/23/2005
03/23/2005
03/23/2005
03/23/2005
03/24/2005
03/24/2005
03/24/2005
03/24/2005
03/24/2005
03/25/2005
03/25/2005
03/25/2005
03/25/2005
03/25/2005
03/26/2005
03/26/2005
03/26/2005
03/26/2005
03/28/2005
03/28/2005
03/28/2005
03/28/2005
03/28/2005
Dyne Test Issues
Invalid RH values, corrected using airport values
Invalid RH values, corrected using airport values
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. Invalid RH values,
corrected using airport values
Invalid RH values, corrected using airport values
Invalid RH values. Phase 2 dilution temp over 50C.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. Possible drive trace
violations (braking). Invalid RH values, corrected using airport
values
Invalid RH values, corrected using airport values
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. Engine stalled at 1300
seconds into test.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Vehicle stalled several times during test. No bag data available.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking). Possible dilution due to
exhaust leaks.
Voided run
Vehicle stalled several times during test. Phase 2 dilution temp
over 50C.
Possible dilution and high background concentrations due to
exhaust leaks.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks.
Possible real-time data values erroneous due to real-time
computer failure.
Voided run
Possible drive trace violations due to bad brakes.
Suspect Data
Possible drive trace violations due to bad brakes.
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84727 1982 Ford Grenada
84728 2002 Ford Escape 2wd
84729 2001 Toyota Camry
84730 1995 Chevrolet S10PU
84731 0.00
84732 1979 Jeep CJ76
84733 1998 Buick Skylark
84734 1993 Plymouth Voyager
84735 1988 Honda Accord
84736 0.00
84737 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity
84738 1976 Pontiac Gran Prix
84739 1998 Mazda Protoge
84740 1990 Buick Lesabre
84741 1988 Ford Taurus
84742 0.00
84743 1999 Mazda Protoge
84744 0.00
84745 1990 Honda Civic
84746 0.00
84747 2003 Dodge Caravan
84748 2002 Dodge Caravan
84749 2001 Toyota Sienna
84750 0.00
84751 1998 Ford Escort
84752 1978 Ford F100 PU
84753 2003 Dodge Caravan
84754 2003 Chrysler Town & Country
84755 2002 Honda Odyssey
84756 0.00
84757 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Odometer
Inertia
Hp@50mph
Time
Date
64654
36209
46869
75640
0
8518
65464
166916
209393
0
64091
60909
88569
107876
14072
0
122968
0
133966
0
0
60790
80227
0
55309
58917
47649
20787
60753
0
90011
3500
3500
3500
3500
0
3000
3500
4000
2750
0
3000
4500
2750
3500
3500
0
2750
0
2250
0
0
4500
4000
0
2750
3500
4500
4500
4500
0
4000
10.6
7.5
6.7
9.8
0.0
10.6
5.9
7.3
6.4
0.0
6.7
10.7
6.8
6.8
4.0
0.0
6.9
0.0
4.6
0.0
0.0
9.3
9.4
0.0
6.0
12.2
7.9
8.9
12.7
0.0
11.7
1:45 p.m.
8:06 a.m.
9:16 a.m.
10:26 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
12:50 p.m.
8:21 a.m.
9:32 a.m.
10:41 a.m.
11:50 a.m.
1:08 p.m.
2:20 p.m.
7:54 a.m.
9:13 a.m.
10:25 a.m.
11:40 a.m.
8:02 a.m.
9:00 a.m.
8:05 a.m.
9:13 a.m.
8:18 a.m.
9:23 a.m.
10:34 a.m.
11:59 a.m.
12:47 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
8:15 a.m.
9:25 a.m.
10:42 a.m.
11:30 a.m.
12:56 a.m.
03/28/2005
03/29/2005
03/29/2005
03/29/2005
03/29/2005
03/29/2005
03/30/2005
03/30/2005
03/30/2005
03/30/2005
03/30/2005
03/30/2005
03/31/2005
03/31/2005
03/31/2005
03/31/2005
04/01/2005
04/01/2005
04/02/2005
04/02/2005
04/04/2005
04/04/2005
04/04/2005
04/04/2005
04/04/2005
04/04/2005
04/05/2005
04/05/2005
04/05/2005
04/05/2005
04/05/2005
Dyne Test Issues
Possible drive trace violations due to bad brakes Phase 2
dilution temp over 50C.
Suspect Data
HC values suspect, dyne bench HC wouldn't span properly.
Possible drive trace violations due to bad brakes.
Wrong drive trace used.
-------
Run # Veh Yr, Make, Model
84758 1979 Chevrolet ClOBeauville
84759 2005 Ford Focus
84760 2004 Ford Escape
84761 2004 Kia Sedona
84762 0.00
84763 2003 Honda Odyssey
84764 202GMB
84765 1985 Chevrolet Impala
84766 2000 Dodge Caravan
84767 1998 Nissan Frontier PU
84768 1995 Ford F150 PU
84769 0.00
84770 1995 Ford F250 PU
84771 1994 Chevrolet Astrovan
84772 1992 Dodge Caravan
84773 1998 Toyota 4Runner
84774 1995 Dodge Caravan
84775 1997 Chevrolet Suburban
84776 0.00
84777 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Odometer
84025
6701
10519
16609
0
44752
0
75914
93162
107615
147342
0
52586
133318
143971
115768
136837
137630
0
Inertia
4000
3000
3500
5000
0
4500
0
4000
4000
3500
4500
0
4500
4000
4000
4000
4000
5000
0
Hp@50mph
14.6
11.7
10.4
10.7
0.0
12.4
0.0
11.1
10.0
11.0
11.6
0.0
11.6
12.3
7.0
11.7
7.6
10.8
0.0
Time
2:30 a.m.
8:19 a.m.
9:28 a.m.
10:45 a.m.
11:36 a.m.
12:50 p.m.
1:30 p.m.
2:15 a.m.
8:14 a.m.
9:26 a.m.
10:40 a.m.
11:56 a.m.
12:45 p.m.
2:06 p.m.
3:23 p.m.
8:30 a.m.
9:45 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
11:59 a.m.
Date
04/05/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/08/2005
04/08/2005
04/08/2005
04/08/2005
Dyne Test Issues
Realtime filter heater off.
Realtime filter heater off.
Realtime filter heater off.
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. Possible drive trace
violations (braking).
Possible drive trace violations (braking).
Suspect Data
87020
3500
9.6
1:15 p.m. 04/08/2005
Possible dilution due to exhaust leaks. CVS bags not fully
evacuated prior to start of test.
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix W
Remote Sensing Data Second-by-Second
Round 1 Model Year
Vehicle Specific Power
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
mygrp vsp bin r n s n
81
81
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1998
1998
0
3
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
1
25
4
138
258
604
831
1358
415
63
5
167
326
664
1069
1768
512
80
27
3
148
330
653
1057
1799
527
97
37
2
163
419
821
1280
2457
750
124
27
5
173
tm n meairvsp meanrvsp var
4
3
9
8
3
3
3
3
2
2
11
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
10
10
5
5
4
4
4
4
2
17
15
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
11
8
180
1194
256
978.875
127.3333
106
92.33333
96
26
10
171.0909
835.8571
164
135
107
127.75
29.25
8
10.5
242.6
933.2
141.4
125
133
138.25
29.75
9.75
3.5
237.9412
952.8
177.6
147
135.6
142.6
23.2
8.2
2
173.3636
878.5
-0.11203
1 .728781
-0.097424
1 .669362
4.742632
7.635469
10.59467
14.54893
20.25986
26.08284
-0.116717
1 .58943
4.70428
7.649005
10.48889
14.67386
20.20378
26.17593
32.92428
-0.070754
1.62165
4.73942
7.685369
10.53087
14.66119
20.12617
26.16772
1093.037
-0.096956
1 .602874
4.680104
7.722207
10.5395
14.63801
20.19417
25.89407
33.6635
-0.08334
1 .555442
0.610613
0.006643
0.80198
0.646474
0.65839
0.713862
2.650966
2.683251
2.106726
0.007247
0.654339
0.74691
0.711584
0.708727
2.87271
2.540019
2.696712
4.254191
0.007346
0.679673
0.678033
0.744562
0.73803
2.858663
2.5289
2.436288
2138899
0.009476
0.755781
0.686999
0.682127
0.682751
2.678529
2.558786
2.301443
7.395346
0.001038
0.759277
svsp_mear svsp_var
-0.025633 0.00045
0.082654 0.004892
-1.616845 6.93846
0.209957 0.067601
4.412237 0.036849
7.408025 0.001748
10.44574 0.011596
14.51158 0.000132
20.34191 0.031503
26.78191 0.65812
-3.052619 7.951346
0.367873 0.06041
4.476331 0.00429
7.436483 0.006264
10.48314 0.015648
14.16172 0.027833
20.17704 0.184939
26.37253 0.227128
40.35732 159.5869
-2.636404 7.645868
0.319532 0.10745
4.487225 0.0095
7.454708 0.001577
10.54713 0.001854
14.48415 0.060298
20.51843 0.203363
26.10013 0.623694
33.31693 1.395959
-1.781286 6.551711
0.298829 0.078421
4.495692 0.002744
7.456428 0.005236
10.50659 0.010552
14.38144 0.045665
20.77685 0.110194
26.45177 0.450748
30.72778 .
-3.074975 8.056117
0.378195 0.087647
rspeed_me rspeed_vai sspeed_r™ sspeed_va
27.36343 28.29181 7.033759 135.0792
22.0604 42.08593 1.678024 2.023111
25.95218 27.15642 4.901422 57.85284
21.1492 35.4539 3.580007 18.24158
22.86062 26.10955 25.90554 31.95191
24.43561 18.81325 28.81263 85.81596
25.87995 12.77765 33.33489 114.0356
28.72598 12.97037 35.7561 195.1463
31.61014 11.70486 50.74511 0.156596
33.84857 12.79533 49.29927 8.290236
26.48289 32.55045 13.91429 97.69157
21.87557 32.13256 6.397085 18.71649
23.105 26.46938 28.95595 1.162676
24.33863 19.21262 33.62834 3.278511
25.82921 14.76602 36.40744 5.67678
28.4532 12.06798 43.97956 4.665775
31.98648 11.91941 46.8469 49.23417
33.51475 13.84685 43.79008 8.569452
35.4237 22.42191 43.43972 17.88999
25.87 18.5173 7.99536 81.08432
22.79297 35.1499 5.206102 25.77032
22.63073 27.09623 26.09776 43.18342
24.38778 20.60105 30.89126 48.15528
25.88616 13.05804 39.06196 2.882844
12.919 44.91233 1.713916
11.02665 46.95155 13.42855
20.2733 48.68039 21.42383
28.60568
31.53241
35.01041
33.71757 49.54354
25.939 20.22273
42.1248 5.873335
8.08514 85.38599
23.34515 31.03311 4.843527 17.86888
22.532 27.22243 29.53097 0.187715
24.04553 20.37028 33.64949 2.708508
25.74709 14.39764 39.08318 1.303432
28.50435 13.13721 44.59043 0.760327
32.01539 11.83219 49.33446 10.29935
35.37161 14.38529 45.17693 25.59733
35.73593 33.41135 44.3622.
26.04895 28.88571 11.81762 110.3816
22.46069 29.05693 6.378349 23.79745
rhc_ppm_n
164.9515
341.5352
62.58809
84.30688
81.20585
76.96396
58.55913
58.16862
65.88253
91.08333
50.27819
59.99587
96.33641
61.54895
49.55198
47.49991
51.70986
54.316
106.8307
72.13774
80.30061
35.83639
40.20897
32.17074
35.31525
39.67829
41.7533
82.32189
49.16333
50.24939
25.19473
55.8628
25.17728
25.68873
25.35963
30.80548
80.94444
13.55942
28.75931
-------
mygrp vsp bin r n s n
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
423
900
1426
2653
916
158
23
2
179
393
971
1462
2991
946
201
34
1
185
461
1000
1606
3266
1026
195
96
3
188
436
905
1506
2849
962
205
107
2
129
369
721
1136
tm n meairvsp meanrvsp var
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
15
12
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
13
9
5
5
4
4
4
4
2
6
5
4
4
4
178.5
149.75
131.75
143
20.75
8.75
3.5
274.7333
666.8333
179.5
146.875
119.25
146
31 .625
10.125
2.833333
354.5
737.1667
179.8333
151
126.6667
143.5
24.5
7.333333
2.75
190.6923
873.8889
146.8
121.8
126.5
144.5
22.75
10.5
1
279.1667
592
171.25
153.75
128.25
4.777674
7.684995
10.57262
14.75901
20.23659
26.33372
34.10896
-0.178693
1.513247
4.756571
7.652011
10.55677
14.71654
20.28642
25.98365
645.567
-0.057851
1 .600609
4.76483
7.675579
10.60558
14.72917
20.22176
26.08903
1182.012
-0.124034
1.673219
4.750237
7.648664
10.57362
14.72824
20.23497
26.10809
1100.893
-0.063335
1.649165
4.721596
7.529089
10.63117
0.725941
0.686275
0.71867
2.895214
2.468931
2.962359
9.285426
0.000631
0.739528
0.700961
0.710395
0.69694
2.803368
2.849927
2.437513
1675685
0.801201
0.720785
0.738889
0.724202
2.808849
2.580508
2.474472
1968126
0.008036
0.548654
0.679849
0.702548
0.762505
2.826091
2.582318
2.74176
2265559
0.000399
0.688339
0.683571
0.766307
0.708823
svsp_mear svsp_var
4.489399 0.004606
7.453907 0.001003
10.46844 0.001118
14.30318 0.012551
19.98204 0.172346
26.74487 1.937421
34.38098 27.06864
-3.513319 6.656568
0.480583 0.078463
4.491011 0.005192
7.494057 0.004905
10.5158 0.004575
14.42827 0.034101
20.27703 0.069763
26.65553 0.426828
32.50422 2.51793
-2.64427 7.547296
0.363814 0.10313
4.513621 0.006188
7.441475 0.001995
10.51703 0.00115
14.43795 0.04045
20.54958 0.16435
26.58309 0.551399
32.68697 4.084047
-2.331291 7.422348
0.344443 0.089225
4.415174 0.026404
7.267467 0.135133
10.51837 0.005077
14.30138 0.044477
20.41841 0.022654
26.15522 0.026997
30.77626 0.008039
-4.190591 5.435688
0.555598 0.046009
rspeed_me rspeed_vai sspeed_r™ sspeed_va
22.56017 30.60901 29.44843 3.905977
23.9235 17.66416 33.74279 2.701432
25.71358 14.30051 38.83988 1.20378
28.49958 12.94845 44.92861 0.752526
31.83857 12.91585 50.10412 6.726139
34.42658 13.63412 42.18104 30.93661
37.27304 19.08617 44.20792 5.930706
25.98595 19.92278 15.36006 81.67144
22.52413 32.76026 7.988808 20.63957
22.66234 27.231 29.36186 1.955068
23.80622 19.05435 33.17935 5.670709
25.83995 15.02039 39.10786 2.526565
28.59317 12.1575 44.4557 1.905048
31.90365 12.06122 50.57366 17.30145
34.05438 17.34668 45.77262 17.07711
35.11294 54.77961 40.80252 5.11479
26.37516 25.42075 9.67044 84.8245
22.29249 22.94594 6.077856 29.21583
22.1959 26.77018 30.37481 1.170625
24.14939 18.56132 33.2363 0.932476
25.79355 15.02846 39.60403 3.372884
28.48113 11.7774 44.52786 1.439977
31.68432 12.79908 49.7203 10.35217
34.752 12.66732 42.25945 9.396152
33.56844 51.53958 43.3424 85.92947
26.11944 23.99842 10.23021 106.5219
22.3417 31.99685 5.768939 24.38135
22.22686 23.17954 26.74492 34.63992
23.72702 19.98483 30.04559 73.12563
25.81475 14.96464 39.9857 3.621262
28.56062 12.87536 44.05477 2.613103
31.79412 12.27862 50.28702 13.12125
34.54454 17.32844 46.13675 16.99424
32.77355 46.88569 49.8937 13.88856
27.65732 23.79248 16.84972 59.04609
21.99953 26.12504 9.294374 15.59669
22.22076 21.55857 29.37632 1.471222
23.95397 18.03872 34.27219 8.044454
10.44978 0.035306 25.84776 13.9154 38.98662 1.986957
4.546037 0.001501
7.412975 0.005402
rhc_ppm_n
13.57593
16.32913
18.58168
17.97184
21.472
29.34171
81.87652
34.15163
9.244134
14.59702
13.88288
25.68741
19.75938
17.00248
28.68697
45.39706
10.55486
10.3413
11.04876
9.64043
11.51511
10.17599
14.96744
15.10569
20.59667
13.26024
0.417553
5.931078
4.821702
10.47501
7.567466
10.75015
16.06941
8.678972
6.118969
2.27093
7.702602
4.309903
4.933741
-------
mygrp vsp bin r n s n
2002
2002
2002
2002
2003
2004
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
0
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
2231
839
162
89
0
0
0
28
60
153
176
257
65
7
1
3
119
315
605
728
1100
318
57
21
6
317
728
1411
1936
3339
953
174
45
tm n meairvsp meanrvsp var
4
4
4
2
3
1
8
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
27
23
8
8
8
8
8
8
4
20
14
8
8
8
8
8
7
5
142.75
27.75
8.5
3
274.3333
380
238.625
1010.333
199
128
114
151
27
12
1
185.6667
994.8696
175
152.25
124.25
147.625
25
10.75
2
204.2
832.7857
144.375
112.5
98.75
107.75
21 .375
6.857143
21.4
14.72189
20.27745
26.19885
1936.199
1 .747848
4.473999
7.541561
10.58862
14.33287
20.52322
25.63042
31.2182
-0.136735
1 .577779
4.785614
7.588028
10.52287
14.57361
20.28267
26.11659
33.28166
-0.097482
1.685102
4.697634
7.604664
10.5115
14.63183
20.262
26.13712
89.40596
2.847101
2.605376
2.500145
3223567
0.806976
0.683986
0.704646
0.701305
2.770873
2.393346
1.04073
0.003999
0.78329
0.666392
0.730146
0.719724
2.734622
2.682074
2.364535
4.093481
0.004032
0.811699
0.714593
0.748959
0.74609
2.718404
2.51557
2.493969
71161.33
svsp_mear svsp_var
14.38399 0.058895
20.3117 0.114691
26.25742 0.182843
33.05438 12.51522
-3.652591 9.819539
-5.510371 .
-0.917676 4.791137
0.171321 0.056597
4.351329 .
7.627801 .
10.47808 .
14.38687 .
20.33262 .
25.1204 .
33.59496 .
-2.1353 7.005587
0.307047 0.08777
4.504839 0.004886
7.459296 0.001585
10.48177 0.00244
14.42437 0.015459
20.51264 0.16848
25.95398 0.410574
32.28561 1.325625
-2.398126 6.57868
0.404973 0.093767
4.463751 0.016157
7.436873 0.020895
10.40146 0.065691
14.40563 0.031288
20.10125 0.58666
26.12491 0.464383
rspeed_me rspeed_vai sspeed_r™ sspeed_va
28.47765 12.62336 43.92324 1.4859
31.7331 11.78279 50.28896 9.322214
35.14784 13.50694 45.01388 15.98119
31.6273 47.59227 39.62142 0.00575
27.64518 25.36476 13.11022 94.71074
28.07877 22.36193 17.8579 .
28.62737 27.06599 3.34386 41.26257
22.57214 27.44922 3.053585 15.30485
22.4135 23.63828 29.33072 .
24.34961 15.27631 36.07098 .
26.1879 15.44117 37.36859 .
28.62366 12.1953 42.59035 .
32.72615 12.34259 50.88894 .
34.94143 24.33428 47.38028 .
33.84 . 49.4233 .
25.96868 40.7392 6.45929 63.16538
20.93462 31.94836 5.198298 22.98318
22.47492 25.86161 29.19812 1.144156
23.91471 16.3401 33.61268 3.659462
25.91956 14.44827 39.37469 2.980678
28.58355 11.32684 44.27813 1.734531
31.34786 14.59608 50.3557 6.495875
32.7686 14.32795 47.80293 13.86272
34.99952 27.31468 41.20556 25.6345
26.37934 25.46441 11.41351 94.22827
21.58028 32.26638 6.599783 23.76767
22.89177 25.19667 31.33356 79.19755
24.22259 19.52074 35.1028 49.26539
25.98216 14.57021 39.55564 60.21342
28.71911 12.50471 42.68338 31.54019
31.73616 11.88846 46.85895 56.71521
33.78029 20.83763 45.67776 22.46786
52.08212 1983.474 35.69756 42.51981 42.10531 110.9769
rhc_ppm_n
4.617324
6.636818
8.259506
10.61112
5.98904
3.618883
46.77
428.3168
238.0142
270.8605
174.7711
192.4407
151.1977
205.9829
38.69
225.3503
189.1339
177.3892
152.2228
156.5203
124.5358
102.8878
155.4851
250.3305
65.8924
150.1142
144.4307
107.4315
97.37079
83.36582
81.34977
85.53638
98.66756
-------
he ppm vshc ppm rshc ppm \rco perc nrco perc vsco perc rsco perc \rco2 perc rco2 perc sco2 perc sco2 perc
111740.4
131405.2
5896.233
31028.02
50081 .01
67458.56
8806.838
17253.5
14762.89
25307.61
15426.46
74867.59
235563.8
56063.08
14947.42
17533.1
5935.024
6782.785
7169.83
16554.57
192883.4
10480.96
19126.86
6352.353
31686.74
5054.948
5197.575
3837.844
14326.15
75278.14
3548.726
313591.9
5857.03
3077.359
2927.793
3969.39
20828.16
1554.363
21066.54
4321 .323
3750.892
294.9323
301 .6888
301 .7353
345.96
762.7625
884.1383
322.3201
1090.361
287.972
498.6189
220.2868
190.7712
173.9902
172.8556
344.8302
475.1719
395.2787
210.391
257.3201
234.7509
207.0866
123.1883
129.6702
179.8785
205.3109
558.134
124.5531
158.5567
90.64956
91 .92582
96.68639
112.5253
218.5687
510.0765
974.143
197.9679
144.1604
8771814
9166448
46606.38
26982.2
82409.27
120106.2
1178622
1687518
57333.7
3036.715
18831.38
128959.6
13340.31
8310.381
7106.613
6434.247
30272.7
123126.9
1455.169
14865.11
43045.9
56476.91
37719.33
7839.131
11530.44
35932.59
32717.43
380807.4
8877.666
5131.909
1162.94
2225.05
2860.981
7005.965
75600.54
676266.9
91100.5
12304.87
1.139804
2.7724
0.433689
0.576243
0.493226
0.460006
0.436664
0.435103
0.875122
1 .402063
0.396995
0.412939
0.389575
0.322096
0.309757
0.424881
0.603146
1.18875
3.051111
0.449772
0.463196
0.217448
0.284681
0.257514
0.31631
0.507065
0.765524
2.476141
0.218397
0.321387
0.242292
0.252723
0.203818
0.276445
0.45427
0.498831
1 .722078
0.242292
0.298131
3.831796
10.03166
0.517152
0.862359
1 .662864
1 .058501
1.102027
0.761957
3.325128
3.153765
0.799705
0.42052
0.53517
0.496719
0.517512
1 .003991
1 .525246
3.82813
8.359503
0.761378
0.864576
0.108493
0.488857
0.537014
0.651696
1.210468
2.731136
6.54343
0.50105
0.338853
0.21846
0.396745
0.225925
0.566855
1.081218
1 .704238
3.630617
0.567755
0.732862
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
.516583
.120964
.175883
0.23065
.256671
.217745
.219241
.231529
.095337
.223973
.236885
.534953
.399962
.438274
.337051
.354673
.098655
.343314
.547601
.174818
.228941
.228801
.221775
.206339
.193146
.203922
.528222
.957104
.115434
.183467
.181627
0.20214
.185359
.168004
.411334
.556266
4.491
.120671
.167788
7.936394
9.553001
0.0183
0.029043
0.046909
0.026794
0.028528
0.047913
1.322124
0.167604
0.013075
0.373099
0.006666
0.001033
0.001523
0.002606
0.946524
1 .066586
0.005735
0.024788
0.019967
0.015763
0.020423
0.027864
0.028627
0.031483
0.280516
0.45416
0.007553
0.011669
0.033023
0.050466
0.052614
0.033583
0.207172
5.299071
0.019135
0.013235
14.20128
13.042
14.69536
14.62442
14.67213
14.6924
14.7078
14.70412
14.38506
14.0081
14.74325
14.74329
14.7504
14.79687
14.80119
14.71735
14.58396
14.16413
12.82444
14.69755
14.70547
14.88058
14.82781
14.84774
14.80345
14.66319
14.4734
13.24703
14.86633
14.81215
14.86685
14.85218
14.88841
14.83484
14.70684
14.67274
13.79593
14.85767
14.83156
2.010332
5.1699
0.270974
0.458234
0.870546
0.552139
0.57185
0.393472
1 .702553
1.61449
0.414303
0.227344
0.289482
0.261187
0.271266
0.519551
0.784113
1 .960235
4.216756
0.399542
0.465215
0.060667
0.257779
0.28106
0.339903
0.62503
1 .398202
3.321727
0.255874
0.185848
0.115207
0.221391
0.118684
0.294155
0.557569
0.882305
1 .896648
0.292437
0.388738
10.71471
1 1 .53925
13.5942
14.14982
15.05819
15.1077
15.14355
15.14356
14.62217
13.1729
13.88651
14.09351
14.86673
14.86952
14.9774
14.92553
14.52569
14.39946
14.88812
12.25085
14.10029
15.01344
15.0788
15.15807
15.17839
15.18269
14.97761
14.61701
13.69263
14.36687
15.04804
15.12321
15.18471
15.22501
15.04662
14.41806
12.1123
13.80376
14.77166
4.235413
0.767887
4.257731
1.57491
0.000543
0.000392
0.002506
0.010985
0.282472
0.000509
1 .425999
0.996044
0.019039
0.005656
0.002452
0.016197
0.39412
0.359015
0.000437
14.96333
2.460742
0.039972
0.028051
0.019561
0.018744
0.024056
0.091665
0.345634
1.981911
0.488975
0.017704
0.014778
0.016451
0.012871
0.122632
2.07606
4.88027
0.025126
rnx_ppm_n rnx_ppm_v snx_ppm_r snx_ppm_var
704.5849 679844.7 269.5798 45635.08
258.7056 42389.89 687.4196 510385.1
1196.97 683909.4 154.152 3404.575
273.4533 140541.4 295.9402 27880.3
576.9099 457696 287.6634 28282.94
728.8241 537532.3 398.2244 54572.33
781.2031 609874.2 431.1098 7210.325
920.9017 771627.7 525.9786 3623.37
1020.315 966277.7 587.8922 208.6682
932.7916 1011832 592.1251 1813.619
615.508 365489.3 150.8412 5678.594
267.6384 312365.9 264.3573 30182.05
479.0935 373939.3 292.9655 10600.95
588.5786 425799.5 338.4375 22126.21
738.8092 659202.9 382.627 22849.07
772.8208 615601.8 476.3079 87676.39
926.0588 701423.8 556.439 49420.89
930.8488 534149.2 983.1391 261435.8
1010.443 1276160 753.0235 124089
775.856 476637.6 70.54985 3787.541
301.4243 325756.7 154.2168 5466.5
398.6351 330509.1 225.4361 13037.72
509.6674 492232.4 226.4513 7452.643
515.9703 358245.3 236.0747 8353.237
558.8602 408642.3 281.0163 10730.33
659.8026 470354.1 416.3684 8521.363
792.9766 714215.8 625.6699 9669.289
759.6719 679474.9 539.114 10875.49
747.8547 336415.8 117.7197 2663.99
193.8447 229267.9 187.3353 13140.13
302.4326 233572 172.8987 12987.81
447.1004 397132.4 196.1575 13902.74
461.1316 327430.4 209.7555 10695.86
502.5733 385312.3 227.7313 14121.26
516.1365 353568.3 418.6234 67543.62
579.7052 482619.3 455.8475 12696.62
490.4356 297541.5 572.1038.
535.6238 383987 142.5683 38402.93
146.2149 81072.72 83.70197 2737.603
-------
he ppm vshc ppm rshc ppm \rco perc nrco perc vsco perc rsco perc \rco2 perc rco2 perc sco2 perc sco2 perc rnx ppm nrnx ppm vsnx ppm rsnx ppm \
4173.062
4618.184
4109.785
3883.231
3325.12
4036.924
9416.72
7388.584
3054.815
3598.478
3962.314
50978.04
23748.37
2789.761
4699.67
4316.567
2082.204
2882.917
5179.392
5075.101
5016.873
3436.123
2805.781
2048.082
1904.099
2087.322
3133.368
2139.706
1681.012
3407.543
1391.415
2315.408
4629.189
2055.191
1600.172
1434.836
2384.168
4915.206
2033.522
60.49668
52.34982
41.71928
43.21579
50.77116
47.7475
84.7078
115.9911
90.60049
54.65822
50.05768
61 .40337
70.49745
130.8945
243.974
441 .8697
66.29535
69.4844
60.72604
61 .95688
63.88151
66.57606
84.5141
228.0991
629.111
99.00545
182.6427
305.4149
209.584
234.3895
121.6055
145.551
160.6663
82.5465
18.08869
24.15215
30.22454
33.38583
40.10859
568.6382
441 .6834
448.7488
420.6201
808.8483
699.263
966.9619
40739.67
2995.051
2916.838
1723.672
2381 .821
3400.546
16979.87
114873.6
408646.1
4774.104
4051.156
1547.174
2136.027
2756.519
3108.01
5196.138
37991 .75
177173.4
53762.75
122080.5
318057.5
121218.7
129237
14036.05
30001.17
31771.02
3233.286
290.0915
205.0445
457.3945
498.628
676.0195
0.200353
0.171295
0.17392
0.218132
0.402997
0.612765
2.60913
0.22157
0.254358
0.200549
0.139019
0.13295
0.183935
0.319346
0.970284
1 .366435
0.081783
0.225258
0.142369
0.108955
0.119464
0.12087
0.320128
0.686112
0.946049
0.119731
0.145827
0.099219
0.055285
0.083868
0.10941
0.202097
0.286656
0.845135
0.091221
0.109309
0.092433
0.057354
0.058368
0.402814
0.308106
0.223775
0.478221
0.986723
1 .269449
8.020436
0.466489
0.255417
0.224528
0.229288
0.109764
0.344879
0.762436
3.531866
4.621857
0.067534
0.318889
0.167933
0.152861
0.168998
0.175808
1 .050046
2.336353
3.220969
0.152813
0.137959
0.07944
0.021088
0.080429
0.212704
0.52242
0.940482
3.382509
0.148285
0.060639
0.067064
0.047097
0.03703
0.049196
0.033445
0.023734
0.028415
0.045413
0.035222
0.259025
0.100048
0.109843
0.097064
0.083871
0.102356
0.100377
0.287601
0.557174
0.788581
0.093308
0.092843
0.081091
0.063346
0.065028
0.061777
0.150305
1.126889
2.280458
0.125836
0.242812
0.495541
0.32742
0.388596
0.143294
0.147483
0.163767
0.0711
0.035277
0.048184
0.085968
0.075613
0.104136
0.002221
0.00073
0.000415
0.000479
0.002657
0.002851
0.002391
0.016348
0.005889
0.025523
0.016145
0.023216
0.014273
0.147379
0.933192
1.716718
0.008921
0.007926
0.003272
0.001368
0.00065
0.001592
0.017099
1 .655494
2.535636
0.10464
0.250395
1 .037559
0.427807
0.48759
0.042151
0.044073
0.053307
0.000238
0.001525
0.003579
0.00704
0.003715
0.006201
14.89856
14.91823
14.91381
14.88139
14.74571
14.59481
13.15043
14.86432
14.86609
14.90087
14.94465
14.94637
14.90919
14.81087
14.34597
14.05765
14.97694
14.888
14.9436
14.96786
14.95876
14.95723
14.81261
14.54867
14.36927
14.95184
14.94723
14.97798
15.00893
14.98749
14.96877
14.90086
14.83834
14.43935
14.98159
14.9731
14.98257
15.0084
15.0077
0.209696
0.162058
0.118623
0.248512
0.509316
0.656583
4.091159
0.241074
0.132828
0.117259
0.120197
0.060983
0.18078
0.393662
1.82289
2.377182
0.036922
0.16703
0.089867
0.081859
0.08817
0.091804
0.541637
1.199965
1 .660306
0.080012
0.071345
0.04195
0.011746
0.043117
0.110536
0.269629
0.485278
1.741548
0.077589
0.032053
0.035447
0.02579
0.019717
15.16998
15.21633
15.24885
15.26299
15.26822
15.2634
15.12059
13.19687
13.35255
14.10746
14.42964
14.65559
14.81492
14.85923
14.83392
14.67811
13.44252
13.78408
15.18116
15.21359
15.21862
15.23012
15.17361
14.59393
13.66105
14.49592
14.63613
14.86517
15.04312
15.003
15.16875
15.18127
15.19426
15.3107
14.43972
14.75675
15.22919
15.26426
15.26349
0.009503
0.010529
0.010167
0.009371
0.012256
0.012238
0.000671
8.319946
7.135807
2.598708
1 .445427
0.75707
0.372577
0.245403
0.333117
0.976827
14.97564
16.73602
0.023718
0.025065
0.02193
0.022462
0.016861
0.419868
0.962385
1.091228
0.379449
0.561216
0.251396
0.266064
0.047744
0.042891
0.029176
0.005141
0.225253
0.051362
0.005858
0.006861
0.008071
258.251
293.3237
353.9766
381.1257
460.3167
464.5727
704.0887
757.2779
115.0791
186.6427
204.1013
254.6351
294.2658
323.4655
262.5263
385.02
453.6935
81 .50508
165.6902
171.6117
208.7425
230.832
275.3884
324.0874
122.891
391 .2271
62.31021
86.04791
115.3491
132.1313
143.6086
179.1826
227.1904
189.2039
146.2905
53.91419
94.11247
86.92412
86.2724
230593.3
230765.1
273758.2
268364.5
411675.6
287944
544115
480179.9
99179.81
146897.3
141533.9
169795
201200
182573.5
84447.92
224554.7
384063.4
65199.76
162517.3
174593.6
160435.4
137274.9
192880
233411.3
50594.87
331100.1
28221.16
52044.8
108523.2
107171.2
96875.89
135251.4
187112.1
188536.4
139549.7
20560.72
80012.36
68287.32
48641 .69
139.5515
176.7593
176.4673
255.1878
391.326
726.9506
779.1878
72.65087
91 .3078
130.7517
142.2801
150.0234
166.5331
238.2248
355.0655
459.7285
42.62221
52.6593
97.34508
90.2239
108.8741
104.4359
236.8443
351 .8485
346.0986
29.70424
32.65119
42.2755
20.29946
20.974
32.60086
64.99139
82.03202
108.3613
19.89324
29.59254
15.40225
23.27652
28.59104
2301 .225
9576.165
8023.714
16526.29
54234.88
113341.6
68113.91
5089.71
2387.528
13113.97
19971
21761.3
26485.09
54897.49
70969.72
55624.46
658.5662
836.6545
3960.61 1
2637.915
2527.73
6130.338
37961 .46
80461 .04
42395.76
1110.648
529.9859
3191.134
76.93676
106.5921
384.7093
1240.369
1936.879
9240.032
145.401
281 .806
93.72726
220.8159
910.5159
-------
he ppm vshc ppm rshc ppm \rco perc nrco perc vsco perc rsco perc \rco2 perc rco2 perc sco2 perc sco2 perc rnx ppm n
2477.98
1012.285
730.1006
680.4774
1762.607
1339.736
6372.405
242436
89635.96
327513.4
125828.2
213347.5
79046.67
8777.458
334167.3
73744.07
282181.1
101477.6
114544.4
93795.9
15140.02
68964.73
166209.4
8144.929
194672.3
179599.2
116555.2
141643
50945.41
34636.17
24149.48
6844.646
43.93557
58.7964
62.72525
147.459
24.80634
16.45659
2428.229
2414.259
265.6904
262.2626
272.9303
286.9952
492.949
887.3234
1185.85
1081.414
91 1 .9493
666.7651
694.0735
615.3492
672.01 1 1
791.108
1243.021
1877.343
871 .7503
917.4005
983.0085
961.5166
903.24
877.7029
995.653
1347.008
3048.81
840.7964
848.452
738.5114
15154.01
238.8612
10601495
7495258
2050965
823479.9
161868.2
222939.8
166742.1
227751
262028.1
1122647
209020.6
2499229
2551811
2292867
2253008
1863122
1936141
1970662
2683388
10398860
0.075067
0.156
0.433139
0.408822
0.077435
0.048526
0.17705
3.44
2.152833
1 .667699
1 .383971
1 .588803
1 .539658
4.894286
4.8
0.770526
1.217199
0.743167
0.827963
1.05108
0.926039
1 .268853
2.304561
3.383152
0.661943
0.648263
0.756895
0.642166
0.54021
0.657517
1 .036566
1.518286
1 .990222
0.101901
0.411308
1 .498778
1 .249391
0.178068
0.051923
0.60593
9.604104
9.507478
5.587622
4.690187
5.285275
6.207756
18.30756
1.529919
4.164211
1 .942706
2.984392
3.751077
2.991459
3.197293
5.077254
4.56245
2.067138
1 .099554
2.410405
2.457412
1 .383359
1 .934577
3.215788
4.419165
4.829693
0.111811
0.15193
0.141558
0.34565
0.019572
0.080318
2.208353
2.424657
0.346382
0.556837
0.787881
1.051183
2.988893
5.458742
5.9813
0.74352
0.795558
0.729792
0.720848
0.708081
0.752861
1.253154
2.021266
2.997958
0.403615
0.489882
0.509094
0.510815
0.499487
0.444852
0.48179
1 .027858
2.431541
0.012881
0.009589
0.007646
0.155849
0.000346
7.284976
7.547319
1 .683086
0.588789
0.570895
0.508691
0.67024
0.88134
1.571816
4.623197
7.675415
0.092164
0.081128
0.099013
0.124476
0.10549
0.080369
0.102387
0.933884
3.679421
14.99435
14.93626
14.73531
14.75247
14.99406
15.01548
14.89789
12.5475
13.464
13.80144
14.00824
13.85922
13.90354
11.51714
11.59
14.45184
14.15084
14.47483
14.40957
14.24633
14.33525
14.09679
13.35018
12.59143
14.53918
14.56397
14.47492
14.55272
14.62236
14.53879
14.26591
13.92534
13.578
0.053168
0.212103
0.773285
0.644757
0.09255
0.027248
0.319839
4.965479
4.921913
2.88531
2.404531
2.714605
3.190267
9.398924
0.789291
2.160965
1.006517
1.539116
1 .923632
1.536165
1 .634949
2.582848
2.373623
1 .066583
0.586156
1 .249695
1 .275073
0.724163
0.998979
1 .650781
2.26501
2.451407
15.26108
15.25953
15.2462
15.20004
15.00641
14.2777
11.67713
12.00686
14.28014
14.32071
14.39734
14.34033
13.23418
1 1 .78963
1 1 .0779
11.69817
12.91472
14.09495
14.28204
14.44725
14.50951
14.2917
13.83216
12.66242
13.03091
13.95115
14.65438
14.66694
14.71151
14.77227
14.75054
14.41234
13.259
0.009471
0.010334
0.009951
0.001575
0.093774
7.342191
8.645916
10.23305
5.059985
0.863381
0.568847
0.552552
0.535995
0.820258
1.917921
1 .269066
4.413242
1.24609
0.157459
0.1693
0.119386
0.125395
0.120766
0.376673
2.635074
125.3624
127.8002
190.7457
158.3507
84.01058
58.01029
739.395
455.7729
874.2912
1145.535
1190.769
1200.675
1041.349
514.4829
522.27
1048.088
522.6233
961.636
1122.828
1218.462
1292.231
1148.101
1145.935
690.9267
970.069
441 .8329
750.8731
930.6097
1043.492
1051.095
1078.71
928.06
1174.581
rnx_ppm_n rnx_ppm_v snx_ppm_r snx_ppm_var
125.3624 87951.99 32.06734 1256.979
127.8002 66603.45 63.46978 3526
190.7457 64435.96 139.0159 16364.62
'740.4 175.348 3312.44
84.01058 58773.97 11.48259 17.47418
34466 15.1799 .
739.395 785992.2 231.8667 13723.55
217754.4 539.6581 71029.55
581608.1 167.4666 .
922550 177.1028 .
1272299 241.7674 .
1064347 305.3139 .
328370.9 307.1817 .
503412.3 420.957 .
413.1654 .
?23188.3 223.7683 50168.7
376819.4 404.966 47027.85
1043963 612.4696 164180.6
1213539 722.0859 258357.6
1134239 799.2841 292999.5
1184877 954.2478 430337.5
1086600 1097.308 353711.7
1145.935 980223.7 1189.123 368442.8
573.5 1041.601 478064.7
970.069 626765.3 277.8996 55464.57
382031.6 404.0627 67068.3
621230.5 739.617 306069.6
793129.9 848.3271 404090.3
905007.9 866.1591 470304.4
921015.1 1019.029 496095.8
920001.2 1129.662 454499.1
928.06 595247.6 1320.969 421410.1
1174.581 974643.7 929.7697 391721.2
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix X
Remote Sensing Data Second-by-Second
Round 2 Model Year
Vehicle Specific Power
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Part A: Overall RSD Results
mygrp vsp bin r n s n
81
81
81
81
81
81
81
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1994
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1996
1997
1997
1997
1997
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
1
3
6
17
13
12
7
16
15
64
135
237
411
126
21
3
20
26
59
157
284
555
157
27
9
24
28
68
170
266
543
181
22
10
17
35
73
203
tm n meairvsp meanrvsp var
21
18
18
18
18
18
18
15
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
9
26
22
21
21
21
21
21
21
20
10
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
8
4
4
4
373.1905
390.5556
155.9444
140.8333
117.8333
132.9444
33.16667
296.4667
389.7273
168.8182
157
128
148.1818
26.54545
8.636364
3.444444
324.0769
438.2727
169.9048
152.7143
124.2381
153.3333
29.71429
9
3.15
361.9
390.2222
161.1111
155.4444
124.2222
153.8889
32.66667
9.444444
4.888889
206.5
385.5
169.75
155.25
-1 .527332
1 .283851
4.899546
7.710454
10.47864
14.46185
19.2379
-3.419584
2.099845
4.633369
7.514248
10.53814
14.62979
20.18699
25.51932
49.08816
-2.547153
1 .766588
4.953424
7.62683
10.48709
14.58593
20.27553
26.80193
37.7157
-2.125355
1.624016
4.780002
7.671953
10.51947
14.72521
20.30365
26.68324
1286.182
-1.812319
1.917083
4.652673
7.797892
1.150296
1.191585
0.670514
0.784022
4.471173
2.026268
13.37687
0.983407
0.855014
0.718354
0.772852
2.876267
1 .994978
0.961244
816.1179
5.85995
0.976773
0.740333
0.666336
0.806382
2.830265
2.929895
4.87458
101.2295
2.690569
0.711194
0.631777
0.654507
0.772864
2.642666
2.806935
3.42488
1218499
0.949416
0.756655
0.732289
0.697851
svsp_mear svsp_var
-4.715548 0.660976
0.699619 0.018132
4.503636 0.006318
7.429501 0.007346
10.49398 0.012538
14.36139 0.068194
20.58043 0.076383
-5.407024 0.129418
0.676438 0.002184
4.491464 0.002372
7.445187 0.008587
10.49757 0.006588
14.35249 0.021721
20.26868 0.088637
26.48944 0.811991
32.42509 2.577063
-5.332924 0.069627
0.646454 0.022126
4.518793 0.004872
7.448626 0.006387
10.45986 0.00974
14.45296 0.019272
20.24257 0.148717
26.66891 0.303156
32.28926 1.302869
-5.313372 0.03161
0.679262 0.001867
4.499233 0.005535
7.460514 0.008851
10.40491 0.005478
14.39302 0.031069
20.18747 0.192965
26.77122 0.220743
35.21851 14.78608
-5.145516 0.059501
0.702444 0.000782
4.544449 0.007639
7.468226 0.014194
rspeed_me rspeed_vai sspeed_rm sspeed_va rhc_ppm_n
23.13056 25.95821 20.11067 11.0935 1045.768
22.13333 71.72143 12.27779 11.24258 1276.443
20.68333 5.897227 30.07207 3.122031 1617.3
21.87824 22.66485 33.98836 2.947428 1109.719
23.54385 14.72211 39.0872 6.438454 828.04
25.96417 16.84839 44.62183 4.030871 368.1933
29.43143 9.923581 49.44821 6.82985 437.6286
23.89904 22.51983 20.88384 7.949563 310.9973
21.69933 12.81595 11.28779 0.741155 154.7573
21.34875 21.71075 29.76748 1.62445 279.3092
21.52689 14.05484 34.21896 1.581776 242.5829
24.05616 12.28016 38.63022 1.478115 346.3289
26.1427 12.74685 44.90782 0.83921 165.8645
29.305 10.36652 50.96035 13.65781 115.789
31.62857 17.00513 47.75294 23.67096 95.15
27.28667 12.20263 47.10354 60.90887 100.49
23.77744 30.12979 19.49411 21.09975 186.5995
21.67615 18.7866 10.44999 6.088345 215.9342
21.27915 20.8739 29.12104 4.07241 146.9708
22.37561 13.75159 34.20242 2.966303 135.5749
24.1044 13.73215 39.50619 3.793909 261.248
26.32686 12.2346 44.78545 1.712168 142.8504
28.72962 12.40991 50.27474 10.26915 153.5579
30.69296 10.46423 46.45029 11.11452 241.5426
31.95111 19.36556 43.41522 16.84519 189.5778
23.63643 19.65725 19.70311 3.694019 299.3293
22.39893 31.27495 10.793 0.362754 115.0239
19.55368 26.37189 29.15559 2.685358 78.35647
22.23653 13.72843 33.58876 2.197348 110.1704
23.73342 12.62334 38.79568 1.571931 131.7648
26.39908 11.39159 45.00997 1.261427 111.7719
29.12757 13.28625 47.96061 7.55146 106.369
30.26182 5.865073 51.8602 11.18925 465.4818
27.521 27.89959 47.29289 34.21006 140.869
24.15343 33.48144 22.01514 10.25069 127.9529
20.034 37.38364 11.69275 0.132246 140.31
20.76973 29.29749 28.65658 0.231947 152.9792
21.75537 18.52433 33.89918 1.863682 111.9017
-------
Part A: Overall RSD Results
mygrp
1997
1997
1997
1997
1997
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1998
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
vsp bin r n
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
s n
358
793
237
42
14
31
29
67
255
406
807
281
39
14
24
33
90
230
402
937
377
52
19
30
37
103
277
435
959
385
65
24
28
38
99
227
415
1042
4
4
4
4
4
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
13
10
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
10
9
8
8
8
8
8
8
7
13
11
11
11
11
11
tm n meairvsp meanrvsp var
4
4
4
4
4
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
13
10
8
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
10
9
8
8
8
8
8
8
7
13
11
11
11
11
11
125.75
148
25.75
8.75
2.25
351 .7778
392.375
164.5625
151.875
127.5
156.3125
33.125
9
4.307692
233.3
482.75
147.1429
131.7143
111.5714
138.8571
34.14286
9.142857
5.8
311
505
171.625
148.125
129.875
154.25
34.5
13.25
2
338
391 .2727
167.3636
157.8182
127.0909
150.9091
10.56331
14.81011
20.04879
25.61566
52.71465
-2.260419
1.775817
4.863981
7.752419
10.57003
14.7872
20.25872
26.11519
47.27867
-1.891631
1 .703628
4.755283
7.752986
10.64313
14.81499
20.15602
26.20765
561.6014
-2.712952
1 .848292
4.84171
7.681441
10.58435
14.83074
20.13719
26.26594
954.1808
-2.436174
1.61845
4.794409
7.60776
10.59528
14.79126
0.78569
2.849774
2.513527
1 .853203
1352.228
3.000616
0.581131
0.526962
0.599443
0.705345
2.90652
2.800803
3.483072
445.5303
3.737335
1.02576
0.749588
0.716575
0.739819
2.937359
2.612208
2.793701
1610489
13.77028
0.82859
0.748017
0.702038
0.762198
2.781434
2.305939
2.704573
1646756
6.77346
0.663068
0.668832
0.828967
0.731955
2.865727
svsp mearsvsp var
10.43648
14.52298
19.91976
26.52751
34.30023
-5.356153
0.642912
4.501219
7.476148
10.45042
14.42682
20.1584
26.73363
33.1178
-5.328732
0.582224
4.416588
7.485516
10.51337
14.43354
20.23934
26.61478
33.81523
-5.419784
0.588091
4.518812
7.427445
10.49483
14.48695
20.47918
26.40138
31 .63868
-5.419617
0.640255
4.513796
7.452596
10.48232
14.4325
0.009809
0.065728
0.103859
0.400642
12.87631
0.057537
0.001991
0.000985
0.00419
0.006588
0.036852
0.157745
0.38495
2.579933
0.049855
0.055688
0.006643
0.016001
0.002486
0.011561
0.106741
0.613034
13.05847
0.026004
0.051143
0.003589
0.006735
0.011169
0.020477
0.109316
0.388733
1.94287
0.038261
0.001459
0.003816
0.003549
0.005803
0.012111
rspeed merspeed vaisspeed rmsspeed va
23.60159
26.376
29.13236
30.50548
31 .28429
23.21739
20.2769
21.15791
21 .82349
24.03182
26.27103
28.86206
31 .49564
32.72429
23.30253
19.85576
21 .52589
21 .79652
23.59851
26.34867
28.95668
31.04712
33.23632
24.48453
20.51297
19.95854
22.18816
23.8986
26.40575
28.91766
31 .78862
30.5525
24.73165
20.92079
21 .20798
22.10286
23.68728
26.32647
12.71235
12.02259
11.46656
7.408523
75.08056
30.19838
30.09287
17.09529
15.31893
13.44989
11.56921
10.75675
13.13146
30.44575
20.7993
24.96446
23.20012
18.64104
14.07349
11.9313
11.18992
8.89975
21.53028
21 .4286
34.37732
24.65797
18.84901
13.78597
12.24377
10.45947
13.86948
25.17289
19.81184
45.70315
31.67237
15.52323
11.90746
11.14898
38.69845
45.04538
50.56903
47.47034
47.88974
19.89821
10.89413
28.74032
32.78953
38.08647
45.47622
51.36148
48.78514
43.1269
20.47558
11.426
30.20013
36.89394
39.86362
45.60877
52.45985
41.91124
45.05491
17.60702
9.543084
29.21102
33.75136
39.15606
44.57966
51 .42863
47.81146
46.6652
20.2517
10.76145
29.53146
33.97293
38.74205
44.93513
3.033839
5.177349
7.284962
16.10399
0.491881
4.255627
0.704071
1 .525988
2.361738
4.469098
0.839512
8.867716
14.69765
27.96766
99.08977
45.40822
38.54234
65.27608
24.48344
11.96125
7.255908
98.2762
29.65827
42.3971 1
13.26232
2.973004
4.79109
1.54017
0.4344
12.05087
19.11294
86.40442
4.752798
1 .502639
3.531637
0.916792
3.814095
1.916402
rhc ppm n
81 .92844
109.443
87.03291
102.4652
606.3043
80.27087
175.0852
178.5246
68.11439
116.0467
73.06612
43.63441
41 .27923
243.5536
81 .99671
179.0461
88.38271
84.04697
60.22292
71 .06322
67.48414
71 .85481
62.87053
47.76039
109.2914
104.4829
59.39949
78.2517
47.34372
35.45894
16.918
137.2838
25.17079
13.65658
46.22273
61.12573
38.21995
49.94402
-------
Part A: Overall RSD Results
mygrp vsp bin r n s n
2001
2001
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2003
2004
2005
8182
8182
8182
8182
8182
8182
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8385
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
8689
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
0
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
291
56
26
13
28
72
193
277
764
304
50
30
0
0
0
3
4
5
9
11
4
3
7
12
31
38
48
19
6
1
19
20
57
126
193
271
67
16
tm n meairvsp meanrvsp var
11
11
10
9
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
8
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
32
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
29.45455
7.636364
3.3
316.5556
385
162.7143
151.8571
134.1429
151.7143
29.28571
10.14286
3
291 .75
390
0
347
165.6667
165.6667
133
147
23.66667
260.625
370
160.4
152
131.6
161.4
29.4
9.2
5
366.125
373.9286
154.4643
142
123.0714
146
32.75
9.142857
20.0853
25.92548
784.9174
-2.626634
1 .578083
4.905316
7.694551
10.6143
14.90854
20.23838
25.99596
1701.659
1.175898
4.837035
7.053107
10.36275
14.89558
20.75396
-1 .092865
1 .460336
4.988299
7.81559
10.36533
14.26282
20.3445
26.41782
58.6695
-2.235589
1 .93278
4.625112
7.633157
10.58286
14.40888
20.18809
26.25841
2.585912
2.625161
1176164
10.84118
0.620644
0.754108
0.634803
0.73823
2.806993
2.660581
2.808825
2225127
0.194991
1.319814
0.168899
1.135696
1 .595557
4.620804
0.616366
0.975619
0.646878
0.705057
0.802358
2.457395
2.920947
2.498523
1 .493885
0.72902
0.742747
0.726063
0.743651
2.775097
3.160933
2.777365
svsp mearsvsp var
20.48825
26.4932
33.7569
-5.219978
0.656805
4.490593
7.479114
10.48978
14.2434
20.64523
26.80453
33.49085
-5.256376
-5.38275
0.740508
4.49925
7.486248
10.55684
14.16627
20.52694
-4.996263
0.650162
4.50672
7.431364
10.54358
14.2882
20.2838
25.80189
33.29075
-6.435223
0.685933
4.526111
7.437132
10.50968
14.40847
20.37922
26.48719
0.164577
0.395208
26.44271
0.196965
0.003758
0.007637
0.004332
0.014568
0.031618
0.102338
0.596586
10.50324
0.069251
0.060372
7.46E-05
0.008715
0.00209
0.004379
0.021637
0.047427
0.147357
0.00176
0.014793
0.003695
0.014982
0.090449
0.182634
0.868555
0.833669
52.041 1 1
0.013942
0.004382
0.008397
0.007158
0.043537
0.171605
0.606237
rspeed merspeed vaisspeed rmsspeed va rhc ppm n
29.14124
31 .09929
28.73462
25.21479
21.915
20.46889
22.3887
23.73437
26.46576
29.4291 1
31 .7374
27.17267
25.51722
27.19895
30.86
18.63667
24.7225
22.132
24.36667
25.76091
26.3575
23.56077
22.63857
20.705
22.72935
23.88947
26.78479
29.30579
31 .08333
37.77
23.165
23.395
20.14912
22.76651
24.40114
26.76779
28.59239
31.19563
10.36936
10.13732
28.15391
24.55668
42.26519
21.76837
16.39439
12.50662
11.54218
10.20261
9.233122
35.97349
21.97342
19.64483
90.26243
9.170825
8.60992
13.11985
16.30871
15.80243
130.5632
6.931848
17.67134
13.96438
8.869113
9.279532
18.60455
16.33295
20.0505
53.32522
29.56994
15.41485
13.0383
10.0498
12.39212
12.41951
50.44098
46.42572
46.66263
20.22195
1 1 .30398
29.1411
34.08164
39.63049
44.16501
51 .25837
48.67632
44.97213
20.38243
19.25844
24.37063
1 1 .06044
29.1763
33.52201
41 .6606
44.14546
48.28404
21.19037
10.75431
28.16893
32.85448
39.78868
45.60009
49.12155
50.55332
43.91038
19.92609
10.84989
29.2978
33.43054
38.48415
44.56068
49.65544
46.35397
3.329231 10.89351
20.82969 38.68089
34.23824 158.0081
8.26773 44.26581
1.260919 76.57464
2.225425 24.96722
1.914648 75.59803
2.017474 22.47996
2.090391 39.12393
2.503852 27.41658
30.74107 -5.401
119.1211 102.4957
10.13288 20.7915
0.098732 15.77444
0.017965 11.02
1.293153 1692.033
0.882263 2356.99
0.279365 314.57
1 .834926 289.64
1.442148 538.0145
6.40737 106.45
9.831897 295.3815
1.11318 1695.93
1 .846787 452.605
1.088816 448.7171
0.809183 590.9213
0.450753 264.1223
6.819293 662.4168
28.97926 324.0883
15.85633 648.93
5.239747 952.0079
4.490038 849.655
10.39931 490.4361
13.52535 400.089
9.7987 466.6713
9.55397 402.5314
36.21896 365.2396
41.01401 324.8138
-------
Part A: Overall RSD Results
mygrp
8689
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
9093
vsp bin r n
3099
0
3
306
609
912
1218
1824
2430
3099
s n
5
40
57
134
294
485
915
243
42
20
tm n meairvsp meanrvsp var
21
44
36
36
36
36
36
36
35
26
29.2381
347.5
376.5
163.3056
141.2222
125.8611
148.3333
28.27778
10.62857
20.15385
90.09284
-2.166914
1 .820344
4.779215
7.744669
10.57465
14.72651
20.17843
26.15999
47.14563
9872.392
4.078052
0.811863
0.720214
0.766223
0.736783
2.801895
2.522177
2.171236
551 .5787
svsp_mear svsp_var
40.41934 1276.473
-5.822161 15.10297
0.693149 0.002652
4.484145 0.006919
7.454408 0.005683
10.47829 0.007358
14.41274 0.041059
20.19045 0.1619
26.41523 0.440536
37.50195 626.028
rspeed_me rspeed_vai sspeed_rm sspeed_va
41.45
24.49405
19.3107
21.31739
22.3169
24.06452
26.56356
29.09346
30.66667
29.656
110.5418
22.67033
47.83088
24.731
15.42174
12.74142
11.56228
11.30463
12.33786
25.60204
47.8767
20.38648
11.12019
28.93587
33.95444
38.71065
43.94968
50.40444
47.84308
44.48812
45.45667
6.251563
1.141603
3.470606
4.297017
2.219594
5.919125
24.83395
22.24537
26.95427
rhc_ppm_n
468.122
917.8663
698.6342
432.6163
253.5351
304.8019
198.1138
228.1288
322.3993
795.548
Part B: RSD vs. PEMS results for site 21
date RSD Speei Veh ID # RSD HC (p RSD CO (°. RSD CO2 I RSD NOx I RSD Accel PEMS HC PEMS CO PEMS CO; PEMS NO> PEMS VI S PEMS GPS
2/22/2005 25.2 729 14.94 0.26 14.85 230.16 1.71 262.66 0.04 13.01 903.74 24.6 23.1
274.84 0.04 13.05 745.56 26.1 23.6
286.07 0.04 13.07 1063.07 27.8 25.4
295.76 0.03 13.08 1580.85 29.6 26.1
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
N/A
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
25.2
25.2
25.2
29.6
N/A
728
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
14.94
14.94
N/A
1
0.26
0.26
N/A
1
14.85 230.16
14.85 230.16
N/A
1 1
-32.31
-102.39
-67.35
-67.35
49.55
2
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.01
2
14.96 1065.43
15.01 95.12
14.99 580.28
14.99 580.28
0.04 686.11
2 2
2.27
80.33
68.58
65.81
68.61
136.71
142.82
157.23
128.14
106.03
104.23
38.7
8
0.03
0.04
0
4
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.09
0.11
0.08
0.05
0.03
0.04
8
13.05
13.06
0.03
4
12.99
13.14
13.17
13.16
12.72
12.78
12.86
12.89
12.96
12.94
0.18
8
1073.3
983.4
362.34
4
404.26
309.13
306.62
310.49
850.42
459.91
592.01
837.78
508.83
432.09
228.43
8
27.03 24.55
26.95 24.5
2.16 1.43
4 4
29.1
29.2
29.2
30
21.5
23.5
25.7
28
27.03
28.55
3.12
8
-------
Part A: Overall RSD Results
mygrp vsp_bin r_n
2/23/2005 29.7 731
2/23/2005 29.2
2/23/2005 29.2
_n tm_n_meai rvsp_mean rvsp_var svsp_mear svsp_var rspeed_merspeed_vaisspeed_m6sspeed_va rhc_ppm_n
-25.32 0.16 14.9 894.32 1.09 112.37 0.23 12.98 856.19 26.6
-60.06 0.49 14.68 506.28 -0.27 107.55 0.18 13.01 808.93 27.2
-18.73 0.16 14.91 685.49 1.12 103.35 0.19 13.03 759.53 28.6
100.39 0.22 13.03 853.8 29.7
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
2/24/2005
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
Avg
Median
StdDev
N
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
Avg
Median
StdDev
31.1
737
N/A
33.2
30
20.1
29.9
747
31.5
36.4
36.9
33.8
744
-34.7
-25.32
22.21
3
123.1
123.1
123.1
N/A
1
-16.25
5.54
-45.95
-61
-29.42
-31.1
29.81
4
15.84
-61 .53
-28.48
-48.1
-30.57
-38.29
33.78
0.27
0.16
0.19
3
1.02
1.02
1.02
N/A
1
0.3
0.13
0.12
0.13
0.17
0.13
0.09
4
0.19
0.18
1.96
0.1
0.61
0.19
0.9
14.83
14.9
0.13
3
14.29
14.29
14.29
1
14.8
14.91
14.96
14.95
14.91
14.93
0.07
4
14.91
14.91
13.64
14.97
14.61
14.91
0.65
695.36
685.49
194.21
3
496.48
496.48
496.48
N/A
1
1083.18
1109.65
109.56
141.28
610.92
612.23
560.86
4
5.26
264.73
9.92
94.76
93.67
52.34
121.23
105.92
105.45
5.21
4
0.81 863.66
1120.88
1427.21
1662.31
1268.51
1274.04
349.27
4
1.4 187.93
0.66 179.87
3.09 172.03
1.28 164.96
176.2
175.95
9.91
4
0.74 32.73
1.17 32.77
3.49 30.03
1 .38 34.95
32.62
32.75
2.02
0.21
0.21
0.02
4
1.24
3.33
6.09
7.41
4.52
4.71
2.77
4
0.12
0.17
0.13
0.1
0.13
0.12
0.03
4
0.12
0.09
0.08
0.12
0.1
0.11
0.02
13.01
13.02
0.02
4
12.2
11.14
9.48
8.39
10.3
10.31
1.7
4
13.07
13.07
13.09
13.11
13.09
13.08
0.02
4
9.37
9.37
9.37
9.36
9.37
9.37
0.01
819.61
831 .36
45.57
4
270.49
246.13
128.84
136.4
195.46
191.26
73.31
4
600.58 N/A
1198.47 N/A
1116.21 N/A
955.87 N/A
967.78
1036.04
264.72
4
50.23 29.9
73.71 30.6
81.64 31.3
104.42 32.4
77.5 31 .05
77.68 30.95
22.36 1 .07
28.03
27.9
1.4
4
30.2
30
29.9
30.2
30.08
30.1
0.15
4
30.6
31.2
32.1
33.7
31.9
31.65
1.35
4
28.6
29.6
30.6
31.4
30.05
30.1
1.22
-------
Part A: Overall RSD Results
mygrp vsp_bin r_n s_n tm_n_meai rvsp_mean rvsp_var svsp_mear svsp_var rspeed_merspeed_vaisspeed_m6sspeed_va rhc_ppm_n
N 4444 444444
-------
he ppm vshc ppm rshc ppm \rco perc nrco perc vsco perc rsco perc \rco2 perc rco2 perc sco2 perc sco2 perc
7283726
2197741
4204069
6984190
1347002
304106.9
655116.2
787936.8
52237.23
894086.5
343402.8
2058244
234434.8
41569.47
25013.54
6970.867
144321.6
123408.4
45808.47
82224.6
3601233
135708.7
100642.4
215084.5
21436.57
451357.4
43473.31
41429.69
116108.1
135709.3
127011.8
66828.89
1460951
82260.77
193058.4
116876.8
226732.9
70237.59
5555.87
5171.675
5234.507
5119.979
4853.419
4560.337
5002.08
826.2264
668.2447
462.4377
451.3313
428.9406
407.3392
369.6176
419.8439
591 .6584
290.3509
396.3049
240.1711
222.9722
219.4416
21 1 .6507
272.8842
482.7672
526.3867
147.485
244.0849
194.5792
200.1409
213.0161
243.3745
297.4688
458.5838
922.7967
208.2874
149.6348
86.04334
81 .58495
49946258
54303523
82938615
82071230
65268995
58670336
61204979
1869473
895659.4
523347.6
506736.6
488630.6
424990.5
354466.1
399147.2
570231.4
164854.7
260331 .2
58832.46
33727.2
39747.8
9445.674
14857.75
183089.1
197342.8
21546.47
50366.89
41355.37
37328.69
38754.38
40582.32
59961 .93
218403.7
2112884
69223.16
3896.443
263.6942
174.2338
1 .839058
3.463333
0.898333
1 .460847
0.726923
1 .482725
2.165714
0.554517
0.646
0.546286
0.507051
0.56634
0.469779
0.640162
1 .558095
0.236667
0.377593
0.690331
0.508417
0.478925
0.385563
0.475979
0.798143
1.167722
2.191111
0.847857
0.598243
0.225478
0.301597
0.291659
0.349678
0.398509
1 .549032
1.11503
0.428571
0.839389
0.315216
0.282069
7.891367
17.53083
3.248137
1 1 .82009
0.726673
2.622561
9.109395
1.257845
0.534569
1 .000659
0.804449
1.91304
0.678375
1 .378643
4.357056
0.046433
0.530753
0.735208
1.110101
1.017079
0.778806
0.83644
2.145648
2.75887
4.539236
1.172768
1.284719
0.120889
0.232091
0.602834
0.436316
0.685999
4.274762
2.889019
0.314113
4.625579
0.272532
0.456142
2.391323
2.243822
1.742685
1 .63853
1.713821
1 .803886
2.867449
0.446094
0.348928
0.289519
0.284844
0.262551
0.209256
0.203086
0.518343
1.131225
0.193897
0.301365
0.218564
0.196305
0.171564
0.170481
0.280188
0.68246
0.869549
0.10428
0.167155
0.192808
0.186318
0.198582
0.224331
0.339659
0.67917
1.410372
0.167393
0.169807
0.176065
0.18259
4.536237
3.441938
2.359434
2.422388
2.535983
2.515354
2.376683
0.228682
0.111291
0.086395
0.079281
0.088898
0.050761
0.046641
0.743075
3.750141
0.027009
0.097912
0.014335
0.011839
0.007541
0.00821 1
0.052454
0.684351
1.12099
0.007495
0.021475
0.041126
0.04299
0.047321
0.056817
0.123589
0.579375
2.969568
0.014064
0.0001
0.001706
0.003507
13.655
12.49333
14.31333
13.90647
14.42231
13.93333
13.44857
14.61058
14.56267
14.62359
14.64289
14.59211
14.66908
14.54254
13.89381
14.81667
14.73302
14.52462
14.65085
14.6658
14.73268
14.66503
14.43121
14.16889
13.42
14.39881
14.6025
14.86397
14.80524
14.80883
14.76464
14.72685
13.89409
14.216
14.70771
14.42657
14.79822
14.82069
4.219466
8.728133
1 .829867
6.368699
0.366019
1 .37977
4.736714
0.686296
0.271935
0.541963
0.429734
1 .026401
0.358921
0.70995
2.245655
0.010233
0.280964
0.389298
0.570732
0.529348
0.430553
0.438943
1.105086
1 .424687
2.33385
0.613591
0.671242
0.069194
0.126167
0.319178
0.232059
0.357146
2.182082
1 .478071
0.156165
2.4048
0.144248
0.239325
10.74709
10.6279
12.32137
12.54408
12.66957
12.78451
12.43072
13.79199
13.79795
14.54799
14.66273
14.73567
14.79985
14.82974
14.66055
14.20146
13.70809
13.99968
14.50393
14.58035
14.64686
14.69259
14.65685
14.45074
14.33677
1 1 .67943
1 1 .76706
12.42749
12.52805
12.79588
12.90544
12.3413
11.75724
10.92299
13.91386
13.94759
14.67647
14.74892
9.103693
8.750008
3.978808
3.107217
2.256094
1.809119
1 .244675
0.845235
0.685766
0.187508
0.16334
0.161378
0.143407
0.135244
0.428045
1.903673
2.853634
1.140714
0.78816
0.605957
0.490386
0.38061 1
0.294837
0.319348
0.448283
19.20763
17.28828
19.17712
18.89392
15.16621
13.77469
20.38556
28.70347
30.84107
0.7891
0.559005
0.04188
0.024431
rnx_ppm_n rnx_ppm_v snx_ppm_r snx_ppm_var
1140.118 1261749 191.4523 27193.52
868.9267 683249 250.1131 39708.74
1247.363 466891.2 524.3462 220325.6
1658.53 2155935 649.0622 290019.3
2173.779 821669.6 754.0951 414939.2
1101.057 551247.1 857.549 469391.1
845.8471 1139817 808.2133 281535.4
769.9731 649498.1 141.554 19129.16
401.8673 198323.9 133.3387 8314.517
608.6134 338529.1 223.1831 38935.17
893.7001 764600.1 230.9459 39001.88
1022.265 822872.7 248.3221 36470.5
963.8967 888372.3 299.6578 48690.51
1130.705 1245631 443.1574 78357.21
383100 586.3059 107252.6
2320328 645.3544 125200.2
1294197 125.5153 33537.47
863.9271
1676.337
1007.448
572.6708 389718.6 117.8901 4149.065
702.8297 410186.3 187.2954 7995.069
890.3486 730591 198.8145 10885.71
802.9688 801432.3 232.5092 18568.22
991.8504 798637.2 275.2778 28340.58
1064.389 1003371 389.3107 30891.44
943.3833 666857.4 600.5211 73263.17
1393.021 751229.4 619.9098 110031.8
810.3279 899254.1 62.31416 1527.825
289.8704 219996.1 73.77175 2027.756
487.2022 454907.5 116.0459 5184.93
587.2423 507601.5 146.8399 12096.99
664.17 646248.6 170.1779 20150.6
751.3129 596377.9 218.5758 36079.34
828.2862 657949.2 302.4322 81470.66
790.7623 706097.6 369.8777 124426.8
699.798 523416.5 383.3766 166982.8
732.828 1021962 124.6595 15451.45
387.07 238004.1 92.36469 2947.275
481.3256 426768 166.8733 16566.06
538.0645 377679.3 188.5726 24478.2
-------
rhc_ppm_v shc_ppm_r shc_ppm_\ rco_perc_n rco_perc_v sco_perc_r sco_perc_\ rco2_perc_
73428.31 87.12024 314.3343 0.199959 0.091279 0.179323 0.007386 14.87793
0.006653
0.010578
0.315923
1.017874
0.009816
0.009751
0.020548
0.023275
0.031648
0.044443
0.220837
1.596786
3.081112
0.010868
0.013057
0.024286
0.025132
0.025773
0.024937
0.043609
0.168367
0.045588
0.006708
0.005625
0.008294
0.003615
0.003092
0.003385
0.005405
0.008151
0.048537
0.001151
0.003799
0.003266
184229.9
67780.55
25771.56
705193.4
25405.48
426290.2
641758.9
90553.72
488231.8
71742
42467.71
24533.82
125410.6
36588.31
201526.9
127774.4
111240.7
55872.78
94167.15
122270.3
34538.16
26277.16
52060.89
154866.7
162334.1
72814.99
105655.7
46957.94
34074.96
6322.379
63623.75
13652.9
9405.71
111328.4
162137.7
43359.53
110271.3
93.94795
108.791
250.6537
425.6928
118.0453
169.5279
128.5417
131.6319
141.734
165.3147
237.429
353.2132
655.6165
150.5849
175.8503
123.5481
115.0092
125.4581
141.8165
149.4797
237.5779
144.3597
108.4899
150.198
131.2766
138.3667
162.716
182.3124
173.3086
170.4296
190.3797
44.68462
69.69483
54.42042
58.09659
72.97186
94.42055
324.8639
501.0012
19255.67
64840.21
10254.66
14563.21
17574.47
16110.42
14406.71
17198.39
52091.21
189293.7
561214.1
7868.115
2819.135
4021.411
2462.771
3562.235
3631.735
5394.053
44058.75
8445.658
7592.782
23286.12
14278.41
14558.08
23285.31
30770.42
23991.83
17702.2
20372.97
827.9054
4427.797
1558.242
1803.449
3155.541
5803.281
0.244499
0.333161
1.279574
1.070371
0.321328
0.196507
0.218615
0.168034
0.242731
0.237594
0.302558
0.588518
1.939936
0.255491
0.228409
0.189524
0.186301
0.16151
0.191512
0.245732
0.472512
0.831579
0.140315
0.133954
0.112549
0.13466
0.159855
0.141153
0.220298
0.562951
0.745596
0.115654
0.134884
0.117725
0.071922
0.085679
0.110062
0.264672
0.544301
3.428117
2.658599
0.15316
0.117471
0.161025
0.048375
0.698487
0.311327
0.459342
0.854435
4.341237
0.437808
0.319145
0.149491
0.23927
0.201312
0.232538
0.34495
0.65111
1.55827
0.090842
0.041884
0.034532
0.05882
0.252711
0.197674
0.574327
1.311755
1.055574
0.04469
0.109999
0.093191
0.016402
0.022933
0.088185
0.163746
0.246473
1.00191
2.051258
0.114285
0.16654
0.171965
0.175817
0.19367
0.226931
0.426392
0.967706
1.436866
0.121305
0.183469
0.157802
0.157094
0.157956
0.155149
0.199313
0.356459
0.204717
0.058793
0.093711
0.08258
0.075603
0.079796
0.084533
0.114952
0.128329
0.170707
0.04304
0.053747
0.05495
0.053917
0.055079
0.082005
0.00169
0.001276
0.004435
14.8432
14.77688
14.10286
14.22357
14.79804
14.89517
14.87239
14.91055
14.85283
14.85439
14.80712
14.60641
13.62929
14.8362
14.87242
14.896
14.89957
14.9149
14.89239
14.85042
14.68308
14.42526
14.92617
14.94216
14.95932
14.94159
14.91894
14.93325
14.8761
14.62354
14.48792
14.945
14.94605
14.95758
14.98885
14.97793
14.95968
rco2_perc_ sco2_perc sco2_perc rnx_ppm_n rnx_ppm_v snx_ppm_r snx_ppm_var
0.051013 14.79508" 0.013953" 612.309 532481.5 236.1516 28092.57
0.143747 14.85118 0.005231 669.2073 550633.5 277.9089 38298.07
0.285713 14.80451 0.006283 763.5222 754332.3 317.2115 33384.28
1.771367 14.40794 0.103466 609.8498 289084.7 497.9748 57426.11
1.333425 13.70846 0.484405 1004.983 517795.2 535.325 45990.86
0.085727 13.94021 0.573419 439.0033 464855.9 88.28426 3808.351
0.063369 14.19853 0.232794 108.7807 22458.05 127.6472 10800.1
0.09007 14.72349 0.038929 325.4504 331509.4 204.0269 31370.8
0.028683 14.78318 0.037354 358.3296 270485.5 237.3147 38322.64
0.37062 14.827 0.024404 444.6568 419721.5 293.5784 48695.69
0.163855 14.83844 0.024898 527.3235 513398.4 379.5934 70372.79
0.240882 14.73496 0.083176 573.7037 511400.8 500.2965 92758.17
0.449003 14.44198 0.517935 449.279 245014.1 715.5789 239911.4
2.245038 14.06164 1.198172 530.7736 390139.7 655.4761 261434.2
0.225703 13.74673 4.342399 686.5977 436228.3 86.48599 8327.473
0.165025 14.19223 0.398353 140.9642 72915.62 77.056 4059.516
0.08557 14.8175 0.008173 328.7012 359498.7 182.6936 18456.61
0.12872 14.86401 0.008521 294.6772 226886.9 187.1124 13054.84
0.106762 14.88148 0.00948 370.7655 295323.5 216.0469 24637.51
0.123917 14.91046 0.009916 393.3002 299217.6 211.7683 16644.84
0.181642 14.90363 0.012172 487.7666 421592.2 295.9898 47500.79
0.34123 14.79815 0.05123 623.1927 251241.9 425.465 101609.2
0.807915 14.84507 0.015687 642.4989 367866.9 374.3075 60793.41
0.048676 13.65077 6.16222 500.9305 509473.2 45.52812 969.08
0.022217 14.26491 0.046888 140.6024 119057.8 62.40468 1317.78
0.019244 14.85297 0.012902 93.32029 72076.77 97.99902 3542.252
0.031737 14.90966 0.010547 182.4235 126950.5 100.6018 3890.445
0.132326 14.92308 0.009953 283.4733 380809.8 127.6448 4288.503
0.103698 14.94391 0.01141 284.0552 243695.1 139.3059 4190.589
0.298792 14.94101 0.009895 301.1733 132219.3 200.2187 4787.765
0.675954 14.92097 0.012607 518.728 487661.6 265.7017 14582.82
0.548287 14.89019 0.024676 510.7971 487377.5 349.2255 43701.95
0.02434 13.81393 5.913064 478.8556 388136.3 31.15883 380.6652
0.056938 13.79898 5.672813 105.6821 60356.31 43.1192 657.6221
0.048984 14.16564 5.889203 111.0395 89640.95 65.77934 2017.7
0.010849 14.13301 7.047381 117.1325 119802.6 65.22565 2580.187
0.013273 14.33755 4.079129 168.6588 118505.6 62.82561 2070.9
0.046803 14.33568 4.062811 178.6627 112340.8 75.13318 3456.944
-------
rhc ppm vshc ppm rshc ppm \rco perc nrco perc vsco perc rsco perc \rco2 perc rco2 perc sco2 perc sco2 perc rnx ppm nrnx ppm vsnx ppm rsnx ppm \
15742.9
26408.42
194780.8
74413.86
102727.6
37521 .99
130215.5
25525.47
51182.25
46841.88
1262.507
89396.43
28305.81
23959.92
1328437
11490853
63556.15
39192.43
211757
46676.3
71303.83
6255235
289015
167320.9
1029775
99982.89
2018296
83190.43
2150039
6813215
888879.4
1326736
1208488
1971809
644385.7
256376.3
92.91373
105.0475
137.2847
530.2909
531 .2707
609.7768
617.5695
555.85
473.5649
374.9978
343.4598
408.4758
19.76221
9.086707
35.197
14865.24
14808.42
14617.16
14780.25
14749.7
14919.71
1121.489
421.9223
438.2132
429.1634
529.9631
701.147
1249.35
1773.386
5699.745
1620.269
1555.593
1376.729
1360.272
1325.488
1355.442
1544.129
1731.207
4869.528
8589.376
39442.22
2196807
1463934
2253843
2339887
1814706
1256927
691609.9
572201 .8
662691 .7
139.2798
62.15024
55.72351
3.77E+08
4.78E+08
4.68E+08
5.1E+08
5.01 E+08
4.96E+08
2357228
62687.43
132000.7
91485.94
163662.4
260422
805055.9
969652.7
31689893
4667752
3003756
2557044
2329778
1873602
1666708
1911584
2452264
0.157401
0.351059
0.89795
0.102246
0.098379
0.186676
0.067918
0.06506
0.097606
0.153966
0.403736
0.20243
0.083428
0.078328
0.03
1.443333
1.498875
0.644
2.363333
2.376364
1.213125
1.312308
1 .608571
1.595
1.747742
2.222105
1.108306
2.323684
1.461667
7.41
1.716779
1.352
0.698691
0.914733
1.113285
1 .246483
1 .27483
1.635813
0.187146
0.81178
3.584806
0.159886
0.025536
0.61683
0.023844
0.019847
0.126229
0.204233
0.909139
0.283283
0.087179
0.031042
5.258533
3.033572
0.31573
5.19525
5.097605
5.019139
10.63657
1.422914
13.73665
5.801785
8.858044
3.307203
7.513791
2.758777
5.323246
2.389501
1 .55904
3.8949
3.285219
4.057381
3.559086
4.870009
0.168502
0.2497
0.542482
0.31957
0.378064
0.578868
0.580986
0.712178
0.632653
0.462823
0.472787
0.620865
0.015565
0.008156
0.045457
3.150022
2.777558
2.685632
2.478305
2.713272
3.563859
0.92421
0.183255
0.226957
0.279106
0.373746
0.536742
1.658012
3.280271
3.250847
0.818773
0.853356
0.983861
1.031896
1.134075
1 .255008
1.851903
2.546586
0.03674
0.091345
1.169433
0.667659
0.62144
1 .777998
2.012838
3.116372
2.493142
1.196481
1.241093
1 .447578
0.000404
1.35E-06
0.000841
8.298869
9.802837
6.97857
8.850819
9.280945
10.84797
2.141343
0.01884
0.027034
0.044643
0.085544
0.128759
0.93953
4.868963
6.821629
2.131669
2.115738
2.475973
2.921856
3.129881
3.30073
4.841897
5.64658
14.92526
14.78643
14.38846
14.96389
14.9725
14.90778
14.99181
14.99466
14.96987
14.92766
14.7504
14.89
14.98246
14.98611
15.02
13.90333
13.8325
14.5
13.29667
13.27455
14.1375
14.07308
13.82714
13.8525
13.72677
13.37579
14.18271
13.30684
13.915
9.7
13.74625
14.027
14.4907
14.32754
14.18466
14.08723
14.06
13.82375
0.096762
0.419318
1.857918
0.084197
0.013797
0.325781
0.012884
0.011096
0.066023
0.105312
0.465392
0.146359
0.045718
0.016625
2.747233
1 .502825
0.1555
2.59565
2.590947
2.675825
5.459523
0.830224
7.103657
2.959969
4.477425
1.69182
3.830678
1.31527
2.749633
1 .233643
0.825892
2.030369
1 .683675
2.117847
1 .836442
2.521185
14.25296
14.18538
13.93345
13.8535
13.71798
14.34591
14.45147
14.48456
14.58926
14.71027
14.7129
14.56109
14.22241
14.82191
14.7203
9.255489
9.881828
10.50917
11.01839
11.17651
10.96455
1 1 .9259
12.3587
13.12036
13.39749
13.63396
13.87639
13.53969
12.7941
12.0674
12.27881
12.08629
13.12812
13.26413
13.40986
13.50529
13.1655
12.74327
4.555373
4.635861
5.333494
3.329044
3.458203
1 .922052
1 .640774
1 .577566
1.129797
0.615716
0.588048
0.751263
0.190524
0.032735
0.011172
2.943238
3.347081
3.633986
6.014845
7.563043
10.67424
4.104156
3.976824
1 .695042
1 .075932
0.723915
0.430689
0.070231
0.96516
3.882956
3.036387
5.105096
2.283175
2.443474
2.132798
1 .944375
2.610531
3.450002
212.5176
203.245
251 .7342
218.8782
47.25357
127.6456
111.6163
127.7314
144.602
187.3581
176.6376
205.7547
109.426
111.4195
37.18
1545.45
1948.775
2071 .498
1239.251
1452.465
1061.858
634.5015
411.6443
981 .0367
1445.791
1654.693
1659.85
1483.968
2103.553
459.99
1135.46
681.181
1098.877
1406.145
1359.107
1467.105
1685.258
1067.599
100889.9
141918.7
287797.9
264855.7
71408.97
99091 .59
141526.7
75039.5
78321 .53
117147.2
82236.95
438496.4
103371.7
129250
1194628
4154453
3846027
1294362
1102614
1596600
269273.9
341416.8
671048.6
1724610
2565435
2102648
1694915
3533945
1179049
325771 .4
1144675
1555205
1332345
1490086
1413768
746942.2
128.7165
255.7597
270.1137
27.02559
44.71364
66.7723
90.29875
94.54752
107.4667
218.6738
256.623
368.309
42.2583
4.132698
7.687626
159.3922
208.8383
297.0593
389.4155
461 .5929
541 .5522
181.8608
254.1945
459.8259
582.0027
660.4044
752.1598
714.4257
602.318
830.3023
202.5505
270.3795
556.2049
650.59
752.2322
869.407
949.7464
900.3043
13641.73
35970.19
100374.5
148.9192
1161.286
2757.22
8793.382
6499.88
21413.74
129741.9
104462.5
189008.1
173.9754
21.78658
4.608685
14376.51
20886.16
76464.08
150531.5
227702.1
324824.3
8601 .243
13698.54
111729.6
239547.3
301432.8
337076.2
158059.8
90530.53
22973.02
25853.06
18942.58
65521 .03
85313.12
123218
184102.4
328329.4
371103.3
-------
rhc_ppm_v shc_ppm_r shc_ppm_\ rco_perc_n rco_perc_v sco_perc_r sco_perc_\ rco2_perc_
59738.4
18617446
2215789
680893.8
332798.1
776720.6
222725.1
128499.6
266047.2
2222407
2904.947
977.0111
772.4141
517.0442
503.0699
491.1243
507.6322
577.634
624.2346
839.9128
10330125
2444207
494655.6
281543.1
296612.4
301267.6
281721.8
301538.2
308128.4
379593.6
3.872
0.979899
1.305425
0.91734
0.649967
0.662644
0.658977
1.148498
2.317381
3.719
11.39777
1.846837
6.325433
3.217151
1.780939
2.01674
1.319309
3.029501
6.041805
11.87191
3.441082
0.730035
0.535912
0.423394
0.404537
0.414958
0.437986
0.716966
1.056221
1.661682
7.246123
1.799902
0.258867
0.182023
0.209578
0.233337
0.310669
1.320981
1.888012
2.920355
12.198
14.28139
14.07158
14.33903
14.53167
14.51769
14.52049
14.16786
13.33524
12.301
rco2_perc_
5.69747
1.041053
3.377417
1.65888
0.925383
1.058388
0.684553
1.560006
3.093987
6.064294
sco2_perc
12.06341"
13.27044
13.46458
14.18016
14.31817
14.40214
14.46468
14.36821
14.19321
13.76658
sco2_perc
3.814633"
2.782544
1.913943
0.886518
0.677458
0.549094
0.449606
0.667808
0.851521
1.041569
rnx_ppm_n rnx_ppm_v snx_ppm_r snx_ppm_var
1582.424 1819894 850.4385 392746.1
947.1775 1217901 206.0274 41113.11
477.2744 292096.1 236.4489 25188.38
996.7759 1024647 486.1789 99459.62
1127.28
1221.722
1301.963
1319.55
1056013 573.2175 127309.3
1204777 613.67 122007.3
1180028 677.5437 133061.9
1084413 785.5241
138859.7
1078.538 770544.6 915.7403 210989.3
1532.178 931347.8 907.9068 211137.6
PEMS Latil PEMS Longitude (deg)
39.10017 -94.73025
39.10011 -94.73034
39.10005 -94.73044
39.09999 -94.73057
39.10018
39.1001
39.10003
39.09997
39.10016
39.1001
39.10004
39.09998
-94.73024
-94.73034
-94.73047
-94.73061
-94.73021
-94.7303
-94.7304
-94.73053
-------
rhc_ppm_v shc_ppm_r shc_ppm_\ rco_perc_n rco_perc_v sco_perc_r sco_perc_\ rco2_perc_ rco2_perc_ sco2_perc sco2_perc rnx_ppm_n rnx_ppm_v snx_ppm_r snx_ppm_var
39.10018 -94.73022
39.1001 -94.73033
39.10003 -94.73045
39.09997 -94.73059
39.10017 -94.73026
39.10009 -94.73037
39.10002 -94.7305
39.09997 -94.73064
39.10022 -94.73022
39.10012 -94.73032
39.10004 -94.73046
39.09997 -94.73062
39.10022 -94.73023
39.10013 -94.73034
39.10005 -94.73047
39.09999 -94.73062
-------
rhc_ppm_v shc_ppm_r shc_ppm_\ rco_perc_n rco_perc_v sco_perc_r sco_perc_\ rco2_perc_ rco2_perc_ sco2_perc_ sco2_perc_ rnx_ppm_n rnx_ppm_v snx_ppm_r snx_ppm_var
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix Y
Kansas City Remote Sensing Data Sites
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Site ID Site Code
State
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
Oil
012
013
014
015
016
017
018
019
020
KSJAC001
KSJOH002
KSJOH003
MOJAC004
MOJAC005
MOJAC006
MOJAC007
MOJAC008
KSJOH009
KSWYA010
MOJAC017
KS
KS
KS
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
KS
KS
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
KS
MO
MO
MO
MO
Description
Hwy 69 (South 18th Street
expressway) onto 1-35 S
Johnson Drive onto 1-35 S
Roe Avenue onto 1-435 W (near 77A
&B)
Front St. onto 1-435 S
Front St. onto 1-435 N
Holmes onto 1-435 W
Rte. W (Bannister Rd.) onto 71 N
Rte. W (Bannister Rd.) onto 71 S
95th onto 1-69 S
Steele Rd. onto 69 S
Eastwood onto 1-435 N
Eastwood onto 1-435 S
Rte. 24 onto 1-435 N
Rte. 24 onto 1-435 S
Wornall onto 1-435 W
67th Street onto 1-35 N
87th St. onto 1-43 5 S
12th/Truman Road onto 1-435 N
12th/Truman Road onto 1-435 S
MetcalfontoI-435 W
County Slope Zip Code Latitude Longitude ]
JACKSON
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
JACKSON
JACKSON
JACKSON
JACKSON
JACKSON
JOHNSON
WYANDO
TIE
JACKSON
-1.5
2.5
0.9
1.5
0.5
0.7
-1.2
2.1
-4.2
2.1
2.1
0.2
2.5
1.6
2.6
1.4
0.7
0.1
3.3
66103
66203
66211
64120
64120
64131
64137
64137
66214
66106
64129
64129
66203
64138
64126
64126
39.04775
39.02178
38.93275
39.129
39.13092
38.94102
38.95425
38.95302
38.95605
39.0615
39.03206
39.03016
39.00836
38.96683
39.09351
39.09203
-94.64824
-94.69228
-94.64227
-94.49937
-94.4984
-94.58374
-94.53973
-94.54038
-94.70849
-94.6474
-94.49979
-94.50106
-94.69346
-94.52071
-94.48721
-94.48799
021
KS
Northbound 65th onto Westbound
Turner Diagonal (132) W
39.099966 to -94.731105 to
39.100382 -94.730204
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix Z
Data Map
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Input SAS Program
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2KC_Regdata_Winter_SWF.csv,
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2/t.prn /Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2/rdBKI_Aligned.sas
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2fcki_sbs_aligned.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/DynetestsA.csv
/SEMTECH/Round2/PrecondRuns/:.csv
/SEMTECH/Round2/Driveaways/*.csv
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRI/Summary_Data_File_Round_2_SWF.csv,
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRIA;omposite_speciation1_Rnd2.csv,
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRIA;omposite_speciation2_Rnd2.csv,
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRI^ilter_data.csv
/Data/Emission/Round2/vehnew_rnd2.csv,
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2fcki_bag_aligned.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2flri_all_baglevel.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Dynetests&emtech_veh_short.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/PrecondRuns&emtech_veh_short_precond.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Driveaways/semtech_veh_short_driveaway.sas7bdat
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRI/SBS/KC-Test-*
/Analysis/Round2/NVFEL_update.csv
The programs below generally read in the SAS dafasats created above and ¥
out ,txt files for input to Visual Foxpro .dhf files sand subsequently MSOD)
Input
/Analysis/Round2/vehround2_2.sas7bdal
/Analysis/Round2/fuel.sas7bdal
/Analysis/Round2A/ehlD_dyn_pre_drw.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2/bki_bag_aligned.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2/bki_sbs_aligned.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/dri_all_baglevel.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2A/ehlD_dyn_pre_drw.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2/bki_bag_aligned.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2/bki_sbs_aligned.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/dri_all_baglevel.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/semtech_sbs_dyno.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Dynetests/semtech_veh_short.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2A/ehlD_dyn_pre_drw.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/semtech_sbs_precond.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/PrecondRuns/semtech_veh_short_precond.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2A/ehlD_dyn_pre_drw.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/semtech_sbs_driveaway.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Driveaways/semtech_veh_short_driveaway.sas7bdat
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRI/SBS/sbs_fil.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2/rdSEMTECH_r2.sas
/Analysis/Round2/rdSEM_Pre_r2.sas
/Analysis/Round2/rdSEM_Drive_r2.sas
/Analysis/Round2/rdDRI.sas
/Analysis/Round2/rdveh.sas
/Analysis/Round2/rdDRI_SbS.sas
/Analysis/Round2/rdfuel.sas
SAS Program
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/ksequip.sas
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/ksfuel.sas
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/ksdyno.sas
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/ksactty_dyno.sas
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/ksactty_predcond.sas
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/ksactty_driveaway.sas
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/ks_rmeas.sas
Output
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2bki_bag_aligned.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2/Final/BKI_Corrected_Rnd2fcki_sbs_aligned.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2/semtech_sbs_dyno.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Dynetests&emtech_bag_dyno.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Dynetests&emtech_veh_short.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2&emtech_sbs_precond.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/PrecondRuns&emtech_bag_precond.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/PrecondRuns&emtech_veh_short_precond.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2&emtech_sbs_driveaway.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Driveaways&emtech_bag_driveaway.sas7bdat,
/SEMTECH/Round2/Driveaways&emtech_veh_short_driveaway.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2Alri_all_baglevel.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2A/ehlD_dyn_pre_drw.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2A/ehround2_2.sas7bdat,
/Analysis/Round2A/ehround2.sas7bdat
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRI/SBSAop_file.sas7bdat,
/Data/Emission/Round2/DRI/SBS&bs_fil.sas7bdat
/Analysis/Round2tfuel.sas7bdat
Output
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/M SOD_inyfequip_in.txt
/Analysis/Round2/MSODrtb at_in.txt
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/M SOD_inydynob_in.txt,
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/M SOD_inytmeas_in.txt,
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/M SOD_inybag_in.txt,
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/M SOD_inybmeas_in.txt,
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/M SOD_inytime_in.txt
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
/Analysis/Round2/MSOD/MSOD_
i n&ctty_i n_dy no b. txt,
inArip_in_dynob.txt,
inAtime_in_dynob.txt,
inAjmeas_in_dyno.txt,
i n/actty_i n_p re con d.txt,
inArip_in_precond.txt,
inAtime_in_precond.txt,
inAjmeas_in_cond.txt,
i n/actty_i n_d ri veaway.txt,
inArip_in_driveawray.txt,
inAtime_in_driveaway.txt,
inAjmeas_in_driveawray.txt,
in^measjn.txt
Notes
Reads in summary and SbS bag data and writes to
SAS datasets
Reads in PEMS data and writes out SBS, bag, and
vehicle info datasets
Reads in PEMS data and writes out SBS, bag, and
vehicle info datasets
Reads in PEMS data and writes out SBS, bag, and
vehicle info datasets
Reads in composite PM emissions from various
instruments, speciated PM from DRI's summary, and
elemental PM from the filter measurements, and writes
out a SAS dataset
Reads in Mike's QC'ed vehicle info and writes out SAS
dataset
Reads in Cantrell's QC'ed PM data and writes out
summary and Sbs datasets
Reads in summary spreadsheet SWF adapted from
raw lab measurements, filters out non-Round2 data,
and writes out SAS dataset
Notes
Equipjn dump
Fuel batch info dump
Dump of all bag-related dats
Dump of dyne PEMS data
Dump of Precond PEMS data
Dump of Driveaway PEMS data
Dump of SBS PM data
Notes:
All paths preceded with/proj1/Kansasdty
Some filenames have an "_update" or "_update2" suffix (e.g.
"rdDRI_update.sas'); these were the files actually run
FindSEMTECH_format_r2.sas isn't mentioned above, but it's a meta-program tha
generates input for use in rdSEMTECH.sas to help determine which routines
should be used to parse the data
The nine files created under the Rsactty_*.sas program series are later combined
into three accty_, trip_in, and ttime_in .dbf files using a Foxpro script
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix AA
Quality Assurance Project Plan
(including revised Appendix A)
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
Iof83
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Characterizing Exhaust Emissions from Light-Duty
Gasoline Vehicles in the Kansas City Metropolitan
Area
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
4411 Montgomery Road, Suite 300
Norwood, OH 45212
Prepared by:
Eastern Research Group
August 1. 2006
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
2 of 83
QAPP REVISION HISTORY
Revision 1: April 15, 2004
Revision 2: June 30, 2004
Revisions: July 2, 2004
Revision 4 (current): August 1, 2006
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
SIGNATURES OF APPROVAL
Name: William S. Crews
Title: Project Manager
Org, : Bevijacgua Knight Inc.
Pate. X-l *
Name: Rob Santos
Title: Quality Assurance Manager
Org. : NuStats
Date : _ 9 / 28 706
Name: Eric FuJita
Title: .ProjectManager
Org.: Desert Research Institute
Date,
Name: Sandcep
Title: Vice President..
Ore. : Eastern Researcl} Group
Date. 7A>V.-"6
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
3 of 83
APPROVAL FOR THE AGENCY
Name: GregJanssen
Title: Proiect Officer. US EPA
Org.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Date:
Name: Carl Fulper
Title: Work Assignment Manager
Org.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Date:
Name: Ruth Schnek
Title: OAR-NVFEL Quality Manager
Org.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Date:
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
4 of 83
Table of Contents
SECTION 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT 7
1.1 Project/Task Organization -ERG 7
1.1.1 Problem Definition/Background 7
1.1.2 Project Task Description 8
1.2 Project/Task Organization -NuStats 8
1.3 Project/Task Organization - BKI 9
1.3.1 Problem Definition/Background 10
1.3.2 Project/Task Description 10
1.3.3 Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data 11
1.3.4 Special Training/Certification 12
1.3.5 Documents and Records 13
1.4 Project/TaskOrganization-DRI 13
1.4.1 Project and Task Organization 13
1.4.2 Problem Definition/Background 14
1.4.3 Project Task Description 14
1.4.4 Quality Objectives and Criteria 15
1.4.5 Special Training/Certification 21
1.4.6 Documents and Records 21
SECTION 2: SURVEY DATA ACQUISITION, PROCESSING, AND REPORTING 22
2.1 Data Acquisition Process 22
2.1.1 Sampling 22
2.1.2 Instrument Design 24
2.1.3 Response and Nonresponse 25
2.1.4 Data Acquisition Methods 26
2.2 Data Processing and Management (Review, Validation, and Verification) 26
2.2.1 Editing 26
2.2.2 Imputation 27
2.2.3 Estimation 27
2.2.4 Data Quality Evaluation 27
2.3 Data Reporting and Presentation 29
2.3.1 Disclosure Control 29
2.3.2 Data Analysis 29
2.3.3 Documentation 30
SECTION 3: DAY ONE VEHICLE INSPECTION AND CONDITIONING 32
3.1 Vehicle Inspection 33
3.2 Vehicle Repair 33
3.3 Vehicle Conditioning Run 34
SECTION4: DAY TWO VEHICLE TESTING 36
4.1 Sampling Equipment 36
4.2 Calibration of Equipment 38
4.2.1 Dynamometer, CVS, and Gas Analysis Equipment 38
4.2.2 PEMS 47
4.3 Sampling Media Preparation and Certification 47
4.4 Testing, Inspection, and Maintenance of Equipment 49
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
5 of 83
4.4.1 Dynamometer and Associated Gas Analysis 49
4.4.2 PEMS 49
4.5 Obtaining Background Levels for Gas Analysis Equipment 49
4.6 Securing the Vehicle on the Dynamometer 50
4.7 Particulate and Toxics Sampling Methods 51
4.7.1 Continuous PM Measurements 51
4.7.2 Collection of Time Integrated PM and Toxics Samples 52
4.8 Laboratory Analytical Methods 55
4.8.1 Protocol for Selection of Samples for Chemical Analysis 56
4.8.2 Mass Gravimetric Analysis 59
4.8.3 Elements by XRF 59
4.8.4 Elements by ICP-MS 59
4.8.5 Elemental and Organic Carbon 60
4.8.6 Ion Chromatographic Analysis for Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate 61
4.8.7 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds 62
4.8.8 Gaseous Air Toxics 64
4.9 Quality Control 65
4.10 Sample Handling and Custody 67
4.11 Inspection/Acceptance of Supplies and Consumables 69
SECTION 5: DATA MANAGEMENT AND VALIDATION 70
5.1 Data Acquisition Requirements (Non-Direct Measurements) 70
5.2 Reporting 71
5.3 BKI Data Review, Verification, and Validation 71
5.4 DRI Verification and Validation Methods 71
5.5 Verification and Validation for the PEMS 72
5.6 QC Calculations 73
5.7 MSOD Data Management 74
SECTION 6: ASSESSMENT AND OVERSIGHT 75
6.1 Assessment and Response Actions 75
6.2 Reports to Management 77
REFERENCES 78
List of Tables
Table 1-1. Example Data Quality Objectives 12
Table 1-2. Analysis List of Inorganic Species for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study 15
Table 1-3. Analysis List of Hydrocarbons and Carbonyl Compounds for the Kansas City LDGV
Emission Characterization Study 17
Table 1-4. Analysis List of Poly cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for the Kansas City LDGV
Emission Characterization Study 18
Table 1-5 Analysis List of Hopanes, Steranes and Alkanes for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study 19
Table 1-6. Analysis List of Polar Organics for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study 20
Table 2-1. Sample Strata Specified in the Work Plan 22
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
6 of 83
Table 3-1. Vehicle Inspections 33
Table 4-1. Calibration and Performance Checks of Test Equipment and Analytical
Instrumentation 41
Table 4-2. Standard Operating Procedures to Characterize Emissions 47
Table 4-3. Summary of Laboratory Related SOPs 55
Table 4-4. Number of Planned Chemical Analyses and Approximate Number of Composite
Samples by Test Vehicle Category 58
Table 4-5. Composite Breakdown 59
Table 6-1. Schedule for QC Deliverable Outputs 77
List of Figures
Figure 2-1. Survey Instrument Data Flowchart 25
Figure 3-1. Summary of Daily Activities 32
Figure 4-1. CVS Sampling System Schematic 36
Figure 4-2. Kansas City Exhaust Measurement Flowchart 39
Figure 4-3. Testing Facility Layout 40
Figure 4-4. Sample Train of DRI Equipment 52
Appendix A Study Modifications made between Rounds 1 and 2
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
7 of 83
SECTION 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Project/Task Organization - ERG
ERG is responsible for operation of the portable emission measurement systems (PEMS)
devices. The PEMS devices are SEMTECH-G systems, manufactured by Sensors, Inc. of Saline,
Michigan, and owned by EPA. EPA is responsible for providing the equipment and some of the
consumable gases. ERG is responsible for installing, operating, and maintaining the equipment
and providing most of the consumable gases.
As indicated in the bulleted list below, overall QA responsibility for the PEMS systems is in the
hands of Sandeep Kishan. The task leader for PEMS installation is Andrew Burnette and
Michael Sabisch will head most of PEMS operations in the field. Both Andrew Burnette and
Michael Sabisch will report directly to Sandeep Kishan. QC/QA responsibilities to be
implemented by ERG staff are described in detail in the QMP.
• Sandeep Kishan, Project Manager, ERG Project Manager
• Andrew Burnette, Engineer, PEMS Task Management
• Michael Sabisch, Engineer, PEMS Field Operations
During field testing ERG personnel are responsible for the installation, operation, and
maintenance of the PEMS units. The WAM is EPA's principal contact. The EPA WAM
determines the quality criteria on the basis of intended use of the results to be generated and
communicates those criteria.
1.1.1 Problem Definition/Background
PEMS will be used in three ways:
• To record driving and emissions data during vehicle pre-conditioning of vehicles
to be tested on the dynamometer (including on-road driving);
• To record driving and emissions during testing on the dynamometer; and,
• To collect on-road emissions and driving data on a randomly selected group of
vehicles that have been tested on the chassis dynamometer. The purpose of
collecting these data is simply to improve EPA's understanding of "real world"
vehicle operations and emissions. Also the data will be added to the MSOD
database, which EPA will use in the creation of the MOVES model.
ERG personnel will perform the first and third activities listed above and BKI personnel will
perform the second activity. Both ERG and BKI personnel will assist each other, as necessary,
during all PEMS activities.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
8 of 83
1.1.2 Project Task Description
ERG personnel will install a PEMS device on each vehicle as it is prepared for pre-conditioning
the day before testing on the dynamometer.
Owners of the selected vehicles will be instructed on their agreed duties while their vehicles have
a PEMS unit installed. In summary, these owners will agree to drive their vehicles in the manner
they normally would (as if the PEMS unit were not present on their vehicle). They will also be
required to keep a log of significant events during the testing period (e.g., changes in vehicle
load, such as passengers entering and leaving the vehicle).
After the device has been present on their vehicle for the prescribed time period, the owner will
return to the project data collection location to have the PEMS/PAMS unit de-installed. The
owner will receive an interview at that time to determine various data about their experience and
events that occurred during their participation.
Quality Objectives and Criteria for PEMS Data
Quality assurance objectives for accuracy and precision have been developed specific to this
project. These objectives are listed in the standard operating procedures and check lists
developed by ERG for this project. Those documents are contained in Appendix A of this
QAPP. If at any time it is noted that deviations in measured values exceed the objectives, testing
will be stopped, equipment examined, and testing resumed after the problem has been corrected.
Special Training
ERG personnel (Andrew Burnette and Michael Sabisch) were trained in the proper use of
SEMTECH equipment by the manufacturer. These personnel will train others on the proper use
of the SEMTECH equipment during the course of the project, as needed. The manufacturer
(Sensors, Inc.) has been retained as a subcontractor for technical help on an "as needed" basis.
Documents and Records
All maintenance, calibrations and data will be reported as specified in our standard operating
procedures (Appendix A). Data input comes manually and automatically. Manual data include
items such as vehicle description, calibration gas values, and testing notes. Automatic data are
logged by the SEMTECH system. These data are combined in the SEMTECH electronic records
during testing. Raw test records are downloaded after each test when possible, and will be
archived at the end of each test day. The raw data are processed and plotted on site and given a
visual quality check. The processed data are also archived for post processing and reporting
offsite. Standard operating procedures (refer to Appendix A) detail how each of these
documentation and recording processes is to take place.
1.2 Project/Task Organization - NuStats
Employees and managers at all levels in NuStats share a concern for, and pride in, quality.
Acceptable quality is not achieved by managerial actions, edicts and checks. It is achieved
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
9 of 83
through understanding client needs and the sound application of knowledge and expertise at
many levels. It requires motivated and competent human resources, and the effective
development and management of these resources and their activities. To this end, NuStats has in
place a series of human resource programs, together with the policies and procedures to promote,
facilitate, and fortify activities and behavior consistent with the firm's central concern for quality.
• Mia Zmud, Proj ect Manager, NuStats Proj ect Manager
• Stacey Bricka, Project Scientist, Survey Instrument Development
1.3 Project/Task Organization - BKI
The QC/QA organization for the operation of the Transportable Dynamometer assigns overall
QA responsibility to Mr. W.S. Crews, Project Manager of Bevilacqua Knight Inc. (BKI).
Directly reporting to Mr. W.S. Crews in support of project quality assurance is Mr. Richard
Snow, Project Scientist, for regulated emissions determinations, vehicle testing and data
reporting.
• W.S. Crews, Proj ect Manager, BKI Proj ect Manager
• R.F. Snow, Project Scientist, Laboratory Simulations QC/QA
The key QC/QA responsibilities to be implemented by BKI staff are as follows:
QC Responsibilities
• Maintain up-to-date project records;
• Maintain sample chain-of-custody documentation;
• Follow and document deviations from established procedures/methods;
• Make data quality determinations based on QC data collected; and
• Reporting all problems and corrective actions.
QA Responsibilities
• Participate in the preparation of the Quality Assurance Project Plan;
• Ensure that all project participants read and follow the Quality Assurance Project
Plan;
• Establish quality requirements with the EPA Work Assignment Manager (WAM);
• Train analysts to perform and evaluate QC measurements; and
• Verify that QC activities are performed and data quality is determined as required
in the QA project plan, and document QC outputs.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
10 of 83
As subcontractor to ERG the BKI Project Manager is ultimately responsible for the performance
and coordination of the transportable dynamometer operation and vehicle testing during the
project. The WAM is EPA's principal contact with ERG and ERG will relay to BKI information
regarding the analysis requirements. The EPA WAM determines the quality criteria on the basis
of intended use of the results to be generated and communicates those criteria. These criteria
include the following:
QC Requirements
• Review data notebooks;
• Arrange for performance evaluation or audit samples (when applicable);
• Assist in scheduling audits; and
• Report data quality problems to Contracting Officer.
QA Requirements
• Ensure the development and approval of the Quality Assurance Project Plan;
• Ensure that SOPs are developed, reviewed and approved;
• Establish quality requirements with contractor staff;
• Ensure that required corrective actions are implemented; and
• Review project QC outputs.
The BKI Project Manager is responsible for all projects under this subcontract and for ensuring
that all technical outputs meet the quality requirements of the contract.
1.3.1 Problem Definition/Background
BKI, as a subcontractor will support ERG and the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA). BKI's support will be directed towards the maintenance, calibration, testing
and reporting automotive data from mobile source emissions measurements for "Characterizing
Exhaust Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area".
A transportable chassis dynamometer will be used to simulate engine load while the vehicle is
operated over a representative highway transient driving cycle. Regulated emissions will be
determined using prescribed driving cycles. All maintenance and QA performed with the
transportable dynamometer will be done in accordance with the Transportable Dynamometer
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), (November 2002).
1.3.2 Project/Task Description
BKI, as a subcontractor, will support ERG and the USEPA, and will provide technical support
for the calibration, operation, and maintenance of a transportable chassis dynamometer,
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
11 of 83
associated driver's aid, constant volume sampler (CVS), analytical bench, and data
acquisition/reduction system. This system is used to obtain exhaust emission samples in the
field. BKI will support the calibration, operation, and maintenance of other sampling and
measuring equipment, as specified in the task descriptions. In addition, BKI shall implement the
capability to collect particle matter and gaseous organic samples during field studies involving
the transportable dynamometer. All tests will be performed as designated in the Standard
Operating Procedure (SOP) or by technical direction through ERG as directed by the WAM.
1.3.3 Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data
Quality assurance objectives for accuracy and precision have been developed specific to this
project, as described below. If at any time it is noted that deviations in measured values exceed
the objectives, testing will be stopped, equipment examined, and testing resumed after the
problem has been corrected (see Section Cl). Performance objectives for vehicle emissions test
systems and regulated emissions are based on procedures found in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR 40 Part 86, Subpart B, 86.114 through 86.126). Accuracy determination of the
regulated emissions analyzers is based on response to NIST gaseous standards. Accuracy
determination of the vehicle test systems is based on comparisons of rigid initial calibrations to
performance checks.
It is the responsibility of the EPA personnel to define the intended use of the data and to develop,
in cooperation with the data users and BKI, the Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) appropriate to
the project within the time and resources of the effort. These DQOs need to be conveyed to BKI
as specifically as possible. DQOs are traditionally described in terms of precision, accuracy,
completeness, representativeness, and comparability for all variables to be measured in this
project. Development of DQOs must include the following steps.
• Define with specificity the objectives to be addressed.
• Establish guidelines for the types and quality of data needed to meet the
objectives.
• Explain in quantitative terms the possible errors that may arise during the
monitoring and measurement process.
DQOs will be established for each major measurement parameter. The measurements will be
made so that results are representative of the media (i.e., air) and conditions being measured. An
example of possible DQOs is summarized in Table 1-1. All data will be calculated and reported
in units consistent with those used by other organizations reporting similar data to allow for
comparability of data among organizations. The data quality objectives for accuracy and
precision will be based on prior knowledge of the measurement system employed and methods
validation studies using replicates, spikes, standards, calibrations, recovery studies, etc.
Definitions of data quality parameters are discussed below.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
12 of 83
Table 1-1. Example Data Quality Objectives
Parameter
THC Analysis
CO Analysis
NOx Analysis
CO2 Analysis
Dyno Speed
Dyno Torque
PDF Counter
CVS Temperature
CVS Pressure
Accuracy (%)
10
10
10
10
5
5
10
5
10
Precision (%)
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
A. Precision: Precision is a measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements
of the same property, usually under prescribed similar conditions. Precision is best
expressed in terms of the standard deviation. Various measures of precision exist
depending upon the "prescribed similar condition". Precision will be assessed by the
collection of matrix spike and spike duplicate samples.
B. Accuracy: Accuracy is the degree of agreement of a measurement (or an average of
measurements of the same thing), X, with an accepted reference or true value. This term
is a measure of the bias in a system. Accuracy will be assessed by the use of traceable
reference standards and EPA-approved SOPs for all instrumentation.
C. Representativeness: Representativeness is the degree to which data accurately and
precisely represents the characteristics of a population, process, or environmental
condition, or parameter variations at a sampling point. Representativeness will be
assessed by the collection of appropriate sample numbers and the use of a statistically
valid sampling design.
D. Data Comparability: Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can
be compared to another. Comparability of field sampling, monitoring, and analytical data
will be ensured by using the standard sampling, analysis, and reporting methods. All data
will be presented in specified and documented units and methods.
E. Data Completeness: Completeness is a measure of the amount of valid data obtained
from a measurement system compared to the amount that was expected to be obtained
under normal conditions. Completeness will be assessed by reviewing field and
laboratory data logs, sample custody forms, and field and laboratory logbooks to ensure
that all data is certified and validated within established DQOs.
1.3.4 Special Training/Certification
No specialized training or certifications are required by personnel in order to successfully
complete the project or task. However, instructions in sampling fuels and other safety courses
may be held as required.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
13 of 83
1.3.5 Documents and Records
Mr. William S. Crews, Project Manager of BKI's North Carolina operations, has 30 years of
direct experience in conducting and monitoring QA activities for all aspects of performing
research on investigating, characterizing, and reporting emissions from light-duty vehicles. Mr.
Crews is responsible for the preparation of this Quality Assurance Project Plan for the
Transportable Dynamometer and for ensuring the appropriate project personnel have the most
current approved version of the QAPP, including version control, updates, distribution, and
disposition.
Mr. Richard F. Snow, Project Scientist, has over 24 years of experience in conducting complex
mobile source emissions projects and performing and directing all aspects of laboratory
simulations, analytical methodology and emissions sampling for the determination of regulated
and unregulated emissions. Mr. Snow is also thoroughly experienced in collecting and reporting
batch and real-time data. Mr. Snow is accomplished in the QA requirements of the test facilities
and equipment utilized in emissions testing. Mr. Snow is responsible for ensuring the
appropriate operational personnel have the most current approved version of the QAPP,
including version control, updates, distribution, and disposition
All maintenance, calibrations and data will be reported as specified by the US EPA. Data input
comes in two forms, the data from the Vehicle Inspection team for initial vehicle data and the
Operations team for regulated emissions and maintenance. Data from these two areas can be
combined and final reports generated. The input includes a unique run number assigned by the
systems analyst that identifies the research project, the testing cycle, and other parameters as
required. As testing objectives change, the emissions database will be adapted to reflect those
changes. BKI shall provide raw dynamometer vehicle emissions, fuels, and analytical data in
electronic format for incorporation into spreadsheet models. The reports shall be structured so as
to be easily imported into a database.
1.4 Project/Task Organization - DRI
• Eric Fujita, Project Manager, Principal Investigator
• William (Pat) Arnott, Project Manager, Co-Principal Investigator, Continuous
PM, Photoacoustic, QCM, nephelometer
• David Campbell, Research Scientist, QA Support
1.4.1 Project and Task Organization
The QC/QA organization at Desert Research Institute assigns overall QA responsibility for this
program to Dr. Eric M. Fujita, Principal Investigator. Dr. Fujita will be the primary contact at
DRI and will coordinate project activities between field personnel and DRI's Organic Analytic
Laboratory and Environmental Analysis Facility. He will be responsible for collection of
integrated samples, validation of the integrated chemical data and analysis of the project results
in relation to similar studies conducted in recent years. Dr. William P. Arnott will serve as co-
Principal Investigator and will be responsible for operation of continuous PM instruments and
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
14 of 83
compilation and validation of the PA, QCM, and nephelometer measurements. Mr. David E.
Campbell, Research Scientist, will support project quality assurance by conducting flow audits,
coordinating sample shipping and receiving, coordinating identification of samples to be
analyzed by the two DRI laboratories, and validating and preparing the database. The
accompanying Quality Management Plan (QMP) delineates specific QC/QA responsibilities to
be implemented by DRI field and laboratory personnel.
As a subcontractor to Eastern Research Group Inc. (ERG), the DRI principal investigator is
ultimately responsible for sample collection and analysis during the project. The work
assignment Manager (WAM) is EPA's principal contact with ERG and ERG will relay to DRI
information regarding the analysis requirements. The EPA WAM determines the quality criteria
on the basis of the intended use of the results to be generated and communicates those criteria.
1.4.2 Problem Definition/Background
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT),
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Coordinating Research Council (CRC), and the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program
Administrators/ Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (STAPPA/ ALAPCO) are
conducting a program to evaluate exhaust emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles. The
proposed program consists of measuring particulate matter (PM) and other toxic components in
exhaust emissions of 480 randomly selected, light-duty vehicles in the Kansas City Metropolitan
Area. A sampling plan has been developed that will allow for the determination of the
distribution of parti culate matter (PM) and other emissions in the sampled fleet as well as the
identification of the percent of high emitters. Data obtained from this program will be used to
evaluate and update existing and future mobile source emission models (MOBILE6 and
MOVES), evaluate existing emission inventories and assess the representativeness of previous
PM emissions studies. The project team consists of the prime contractor, Eastern Research
Group (ERG), and the following subcontractors: Bevilacqua Knight Inc (BKI), Desert Research
Institute (DRI) and NuStats Partners L.P.
1.4.3 Project Task Description
The work to be performed by the Desert Research Institute (DRI) provides the sampling and
chemical analysis support for the EPA-sponsored study to characterize exhaust emissions from
light-duty gasoline vehicles in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. The sampling and analytical
laboratory services include those in Task 3.2 (specialized sampling and analytical needs for
vehicle testing) and Task 4 (chemical speciation) of the Statement of Work for U.S. EPA
Solicitation No. PR-C1-03-10697. These services include the following.
1. Provide and prepare sampling equipment and sampling substrates required for the
collection of the samples listed in Table 7 of the Solicitation.
2. Provide and operate real-time monitors for the measurement of fine parti culate
mass and fine particle elemental carbon as shown in Table 11 of the Solicitation.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
15 of 83
3. Collect sample on each vehicle tested and conduct laboratory analyses of samples
as shown in Table 7 of the Solicitation.
4. Perform sample analysis for integrated PM mass, EC/OC, elements, ions, semi-
volatile organic compounds, and gaseous air toxics base on a percent of samples
estimates shown in Table 7 of the Solicitation.
1.4.4 Quality Objectives and Criteria
DRI is fully committed to an effective quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program for
this project. DRI will ensure that measurement data shall meet specific data quality objectives
(DQOs). These DQOs are summarized in Tables 1-2 through 1-6. The data quality indicators that
are typically used to characterize these measurements are listed below.
Precision: Precision is the degree of mutual agreement among individual measurements under
prescribed conditions. Measurements, where possible, will be made of analytical precision and
overall precision. The project goal for overall precision will be ±10% expressed as the
coefficient of variation (CV) as determined from collocated instruments. The goal for analytical
precision is ±10-30% for analytes that are present in concentrations greater than 10 times their
detection limit. The goal for analytical precision of gravimetric mass is ±5% CV as determined
from replicate weighings.
Bias: Bias is the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process that causes error in
one direction. Bias may be determined through performance audits and or by inter-comparisons
of the performance of similar instruments.
Accuracy: Accuracy is the correctness of data and refers to the degree of difference between a
measured value and a known or "true" value. For particulate measurements, there are no known
true values. Relative accuracy may be determined by comparing a measured value with a
presumed reference or standard. Sampler accuracy will be measured by performance (flow rate)
checks and audits between the sampler and a certified flow meter. The goal is ± 5% relative
percent difference (RPD) or better. Since no true reference samples exist for the chemistry of
airborne particulate matter, the accuracy of other speciated atmospheric components cannot be
inherently determined. Analytical accuracy of the analytes will be determined by analyzing
known reference materials in the laboratory.
Table 1-2. Analysis List of Inorganic Species for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
16 of 83
Species
Chloride (CO
Nitrate (NO3 )
Sulfate (SO4")
Organic Carbon (OC)
Elemental Carbon (EC)
Sodium (Na)
Magnesium (Mg)
Aluminum (Al)
Silicon (Si)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Chlorine (Cl)
Patassiurrt (K)
Calcium (Ca)
Titanium (Ti)
Vanadium (V)
Chromium (Cr)
Manganese (Mn)
Iron (Fe)
Cobalt (Co)
Nickel (Ni)
Copper (Cu)
Analysis
Method'
1C
1C
1C
TOR
TOR
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
MDL"
(ug/ftlter)
1 ,5005
1 .5005
1 .5005
2.7590
2.7590
0.9533
0.3456
0.1382
0.0864
0,0778
0.0691
0,1382
0.0835
0.0634
0.0403
0.0346
0.0259
0.0230
0.0202
0,0115
0,0115
0.0144
Species
Zinc (Zn)
Gallium (Ga)
Arsenic (As)
Selenium (Se)
Bromine (Br)
Rubidium (Rb)
Strontium (Sr)
Yttrium (Y)
Zerconium (Zr)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Palladium (Pd)
Silver (Ag)
Cadmium (Cd)
Indium (In)
Tin (Sn)
Antimony (Sb)
Barium (Ba)
Lanthanum (La)
Gold (Au)
Mercury (Hg)
Thallium (Tl)
Lead (Pb)
Uranium (U)
Analysis
Method3
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
MDLb
(Ma/filter)
0.0144
0.0259
0.0230
0.0173
0.0144
0.0144
0,0144
0,0173
0,0230
0.0374
0,1526
0,1670
0.1670
0,1786
0.2333
0.2477
0,7171
0.8554
0.0432
0.0346
0.0346
0,0403
0.0317
' IC=ion cfiromatography. AC=automated colorimetry. AAS=atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
TOR=thermal/optical reflectance. XRF=x-ray fluorescence.
° Minimum detectable limit (MOL) is the concentration at which instrument response equals three times the standard
deviation of the response to a known concentration of zero.
Additional Notes
1 Boron (specified in Section 3.3.2.2 of RFPJ cannot be done by XRF
2 XRF can be replaced with ICP-MS with greater sensitivity. However, cannot measure Sulfur and Chlorine and cost
twice as much as XRF. Three Teflon filters can be extracted together with ICP-MS to reduce cost.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
17 of 83
Table 1-3. Analysis List of Hydrocarbons and Carbonyl Compounds for the
Kansas City LDGV Emission Characterization Study
Sum C2s
propene
propane
isoButane
1 Butene-HButylene
1 ,3-Butadtene
n-Butane
t-2-Butene
c-2-Butene
3-Me-1-Butene
isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Me-1-Butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
t-2-Pentene
c-2-Pentene
2-Me-2-Butene
220iMeButane
CycioPentene
CycloPentane
23DiMeButane
MTBE
2-MePentane
22-DiMePenlane
3-MePentane
2-Me-l-Pentene
1-Hexene
n-Hexane
t-2-Hexene
2-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Hexene
c-2-Hexene
t-3-Me-2-Pentene
MeCyPentane
Hydrocarbons
2,4-DiMePentane
223TriMeButane
1 MeCypentene
Benzene
CycloHexane
4MeHexene
2MeHexane
23DiMePentane
Cyciohexene
SMeHexane
SEtPentane
1 -Heptene
224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
2MeHeptane
4MeHeptane
3MeHeptane
225TMHexane
Octene-1
1 1 DMeCyHexane
n-Octane
235TriMeHexane+Bgr.
24DiMeHeptane
44DiMeHeptane
26DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
33DiMeHeptane
EtBenzene
m/p-xylene
2MeOctane
SMeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
n-Nonane
IPropBenzene
iPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
36DiMeOctane
nPropBenzene
mEtToluene
pEtToluene
1 35TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
beta-pi nene
1 24TriMeBenzene
n-Decane
iButBenzene
sButBenzene
123TriMeBenzene
Limonene
Indan
13diethylbenzene
14diethylbenzene
1 2diethylbenzene
2-propylToluene
IPrToluene
n-Undecane
1 245teJraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1 234tetraMeBenzene
Naphthalene+Decanal
n-Dodecane
Carbonyl Compounds
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methacrolein
Butyraldehyde/Acrolein RP
Benzaldehyde
Glyoxal
Valeraldehyde
m-Tolualdehyde
Hexanaldehyde
a, Canister/GC-FID or MS with MID = 0.1 ppbC,
b. DNPH cartrideges/HPLC-UV with MDL = 0.1 ppfav,
Acrolein RP - rearrangement product of acrolein coelutes with butyraldelhyde.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
18 of 83
Table 1-4. Analysis List of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for the Kansas City
LDGV Emission Characterization Study
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) *
Nitro-PAH '
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1 -methylnaphthafene
Biphenyl
2-Methylbiphenyl
3-MethyIbiphenyl
4-Melhylbiptienyl
1 +2e!hylnaphthalene
2,6+2,7-dimetnylnaphthalene
1,3+1,6+1 Jdimethylnaphth
1,4+1,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
1,2-dimethyl naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Dibenzofuran
A-trimetnylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphtnalene
C-tri methyl naphthalene
E-tri methyl naphthalene
F-trimethytnaphthalene
2,3,5-M-tritnethyInaphthalene
J-trimethylnaphthalene
2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
1,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene
Fluorene
A-meth ylflu orene
1-methylfluorene
B-methytfluorene
9-fluorenone
Phenanthrerte
Anthracene
Xanthone
Perinaphthenone
Acenaphthenequinone
A-methylphenanthrene
2-methylphenanthrene
B-methylphenanthrene
C-methylphenanthrene
1 -methyl phenanthrene
An throne
9-methylanthracene
Anthraquinone
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene
A-dimethylphenanthrene
B-dimethylphenanthrene
C-dimethylphenanthretie
D-dimethylphenanthrene
E-dimethylphenanthrene
1,7-dimethylphenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
9-Anthraaldehyde
Retene
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py
B-MePy/MeFl
C-MePy/MeFI
D-MePy/MeFI
4-methylpyrene
1-methylpyrene
Benzonaphthothiophene
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene/Triphenytene
Benzanthrone
Benz(a )anthracene-7,12-dione
5+6-methylchrysene
7-methylben2(a)anthracene
Benzo(b+j+k)fiuoranthene
BeP
BaP
Perylene
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
lndeno[l 23-cd]pyrene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Coronene
1-NitronaphthaIene
2-NitronaphthaIene
2-Nitrobiphenyl
3-Nitrobiphenyl
4-Nitrobiphenyl
1.3-Dinitronaphthalene
1,5-Dinitronaphthalene
5-Nitroacenaphthene
2-Nitrofluorene
9-Nitroanthracene
4-Nitrophenanthrene
9-Nitrophenanthrene
3-Nitrophenanthrene
1,8-Dinitronaphthalene
2-Nitrofluoranthene
3-Nitrofluoranthene
1-Nitropyrene
2,7-Dinitrofluorene
7-Nitrobenz{a (anthracene
6-Nitrochrysene
1,3-Dinitropyrene
1,6-Dinitropyrene
1,8-Oinitropyrene
6-Nitrobenz(a)pyrene
a. TIGF/XAD and GC/MS with MDL = 0.02 us/sample
b. TIGF/XAD and GC/MS with MDL = 0.01 ug/sample
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
19 of 83
Table 1-5 Analysis List of Hopanes, Steranes and Alkanes for the Kansas City
LDGV Emission Characterization Study
Hopanes and Steranes *
Alkanes *
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H). 14li{H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14ft(H),17R(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14a{H),17a(H)-cholestane&C29-20S13R(H),17a(H)-diasterane
C28-20S5a(H).14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H).14B(H),17B(H)-ergostane
C28-2QS5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-2QS5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastane
C29-20R5a(H),14B{H),17B(H)-stigmastane
C29-20S5a(H),14B(H),17R(H)-stigmastane
18a(H),216(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),18a(H),21ft(H)-25,28,30-Trisnorhopane
C29-20RSa(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stiSmastane
17a{H),21B(H)-22,29.3Q-Trisnortiopane
17a(H),216(H)-30-Norhopane
17b(H),21 a(H)-30-Norhopane
17a(H),21B(H)-Hopane
17B(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-17a{H),21S(H)-30-Hornohopane
22R-17a(H),21li(H)-30-Homohopane
176(H),21B(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21B(H)-3Q,31-Bishomohopane
22R-17a(H),21R(H)-30,31-Bishomohopane
22S-17a(H),21B(H)-30.31,32-Trisomohopane
22R-17a(H),21B(H)-30,31,32-Trishomohopane
norfarnesane
heptylcyclohexane
fatnesane
octylcyclohexane
nonylcyelohexane
norpristane
hexadecane
heptadecane
decylcyclohexa ne
pristane
undecylcyclohexane
octadecane
nonadecane
phytane
dodecylcyclohexane
t ridecylcyciohexane
tetradecyicyclohexa ne
eicosane
heneicosane
pentadecylcyclohexane
hexadecylcyciohexane
docosane
triacosane
heptadecylcyclohexane
octadecyicyclotexane
tetracosane
pentacosane
tiexacosane
nonadecylcyclohexane
eicosylcyctohexane
heptacosane
octacosane
nonacosane
triacontane
hentriacontane
dotriacontane
tritriacontane
tetratriacontane
penta triacontane
hexatriacontane
a T1GF/XAD and GC/MS with MDL = 0.02 ug/sample
a TIGF/XAD ami GC/MS with MDL = 0.1 ug/sampte
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
20 of 83
Table 1-6. Analysis List of Polar Organics for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study
Analytical Standards
hexanotc acid
heptanoic add
methylmalQnic
guaiacol
benzoic acid
octanoic acid
butenedioic (maleic) acid
bufanedioic (succtnic) acid
4-me-guaiacol
me-succinic acid
nonanoic add
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid
2-me!hylg!utanc
3-rnelhylglutartc acid
dscanoic acid
4.allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyl-syongol
hexanedtoic (adipic) acid
os-pinonic acid
3-melbyladipic acid
4-fomiyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid
isoeugenol
heptanediote (pimelic) acid
acelovanillone
dodecanoic (lauric) acid
phthaiic acid
suberic acid
levoglucosan
syrtngaldehyde
ifidecanoic acid
isophthaiic acid
vanillic acsd
bomovamllie acid
azelaic acid
myristoteic acid
myristic acid
sebacic add
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid
undecanedioic acid
palintoleic acid
palmitic acid
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid
hgptadecanoic acid
traumatic acid
1,11 "undecanedicarboxytic acid
oteic acid
eSaidic acid
stearic add
1 . 1 2-dodecanedicarboxyltc acid
S, 1 5-pimaradien-l 8-oic acd
pirnaric acid
nonadecanoic acid
isopimaric acid
dehydroaoietic acid
abielic acid
eicosanoic add
heneicosanoic acid
docosanoic acid
tricosanoic acid
Selracosanoic acid
cholesterol
Classification
alkanoiC acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
aromatic acid
alkanoic acid
alkenedioic acid
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
alkanedioic acid
alkanoic acid
methoxy phenol
methoxy phenol
alkanedioic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkanoic acid
methoxy phenol
methoxy phenol
alkanedtotc acid
aromatic acid
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
alkanoc acid
methoxy phenol
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
alkanoic add
aromatic diacid
alkanedioic acid
carbohydrate
methoxy phenol
alkanoic acid
aromatic diacid
methoxy acid
methoxy add
alkanedioic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanoic add
alkanedioic acid
methoxy acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkanoic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanediotc acid
alkenoic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanoic add
alkanedioic acid
resin acid
resin acid
alkanoic acid
resin acid
resin acid
resin acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
sterol
Potential
Organic Marker Type
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
meat cooking
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
meat cooking
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
meat cooking
MDL
microg ram/sample
0.05
0,05
0.05
0,05
005
0.05
0.05
0,05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0,05
0.05
005
005
005
005
005
005
0.05
005
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0,05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0,05
005
0,05
0,05
0,05
0,05
0.05
0,05
0,05
0.05
0,05
0,05
0,05
005
005
005
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0,05
0.05
0,05
0,05
0,05
0.05
0.05
0,05
0,05
0,05
0,05
0.05
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
21 of 83
Detectability: Detectability is the low range critical value that a method-specific procedure can
reliably discern. DRI determines the minimum detection limit as 3 times the standard deviation
of field blanks or 3 times the standard deviation of the noise of an instrument when subjected to
clean air
Completeness: Completeness is the percentage of valid data compared to the total expected data.
For this project, the completeness objective for all species and measurements is 75%.
Representativeness: Representativeness is the degree to which data accurately and precisely
represents a characteristic of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, a process
condition, or an environment condition. For this project, spatial and temporal data
representativeness will be achieved by assuring that criteria are met for site selection and setup,
and that air quality measurements and statistics are compiled.
Comparability: Comparability reflects how confidently one data set can be compared with
another. Using similar reporting units and measurement times may enhance comparability. For a
research project that will be testing state-of-the-art instruments and methods, comparability
becomes more difficult to estimate. Under such circumstance inferential methods are used to
assess comparability. These may include comparisons of related, but dissimilar measurements
such as measurements that may represent both the gaseous and particulate phases of a constituent
with measurements of only the particulate phase of that constituent. In addition, trend analyses
may be used including, but not limited to, regression analyses, agreement with model results
such as stochastic chemistry, or typical ratios of atmospheric parameters.
1.4.5 Special Training/Certification
The Principal Investigators and QA Manager have appropriate degrees, background, and
experience appropriate for their roles in the project. Laboratory personnel have appropriate
degrees in scientific fields and experience in performing the tasks required by this project such as
extracting, analyzing, and reporting field data and sample analysis results. Site operators have
appropriate scientific and technical degrees and experience in operating and maintaining a field
monitoring and sampling site. Additional guidance about actual site operations for this project is
provided to the site operators in the form of checklists, forms, SOPs, and other material forming
part of this QAPP.
1.4.6 Documents and Records
This QAPP summarizes planned measurements, defines data quality indicators, and specifies
data quality objectives. Field and laboratory SOPs developed for the Kansas City vehicle
characterization measurements are followed, and revised as needed, for the duration of the study.
Revisions made to SOPs during the study period are noted and archived for traceability.
Remedial actions taken as a result of field, laboratory, or data audits are also be documented.
This information will be incorporated into a summary of quality assurance as part of final project
report delivery to EPA.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
22 of 83
SECTION 2: SURVEY DATA ACQUISITION, PROCESSING, AND
REPORTING
2.1 Data Acquisition Process
2.1.1 Sampling
Sampling is the selection of a set of units from a target population. This set of units is referred to
as the sample. The choice of the sampling design will take into account many factors, including
the desired level of precision of the information to be produced, the availability of appropriate
sampling frames, the availability of appropriate stratification variables, the estimation methods
that will be used, and the available budgets. Decisions about the survey frame should conform to
the target population and contain minimal undercoverage and overcoverage (avoiding
duplication). Frame creation, use, maintenance and monitoring will be implemented within
operational and cost constraints.
When determining sample size, the required levels of precision needed for the survey estimates,
the type of design and estimator to be used, as well as both sampling factors (e.g., clustering) and
non-sampling factors (e.g., nonresponse) will be taken into account.
The vehicle fleet samples associated with the MARC households as well as the RDD households
that participated in the incentives test have been reviewed. The vehicles represented in those
random sample had a different distribution than what was originally specified in the work plan
(see Table 2-1). Since differences between the "real" distribution of vehicles compared to the
originally estimated distribution affects the efficiency of data collection, we will monitor status
by quota type daily during phases 1 and 2 of the study to confirm that we are meeting the strata
goals specified. To support this, we will be using reports similar to the "Status by Cohort Day"
and "Status by Sample Type" provided in Appendix A.
Table 2-1. Sample Strata Specified in the Work Plan
Stratum
1
2
O
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Vehicle
Class
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Age Class
Pre 1980
1980-1990
1991 -1995
1996 and newer
Pre 1980
1980-1990
1991 -1995
1996 and newer
Total Vehicles
Tested
50
100
70
40
40
50
80
50
480
Regular
Responders
42
84
58
33
33
42
66
42
400
Refusers
8
16
12
7
7
8
14
8
80
In addition, the Kansas vehicle registration data has recently been obtained. Combined with the
Missouri vehicle registration data, this will provide a second fleet validation source. We are
analyzing these databases to determine sample size allocations based on an "optimal" allocation
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
23 of 83
strategy, which effects a disproportionate allocation in order to increase statistical precision
beyond that achievable through proportionate stratified sampling. During implementation of the
sampling, the size and characteristics of the actual sample will be compared to what was
expected. Monitoring the sampling process in this way helps in identifying and correcting errors
that can occur.
Appropriate sample control procedures are in place for monitoring data collection operations.
Such procedures track the status of sampled units from the beginning through the completion of
data collection so that survey managers and clients can assess progress at any point in time.
Sample control procedures and feedback from them are also used to ensure that every sampled
unit is processed through all data collection steps, with a final status being recorded. These
procedures include:
• Close monitoring of participants who meet the scheduled appointment with daily
adjustments in scheduling goals. Nustats staff will initially over-book to
minimize no-shows and adjust bookings daily until the right number is booked to
ensure 5 vehicles are tested daily. Nustats will also work with onsite technicians
daily to negotiate changes in test dates, in consultation with participants, to
maximize testing.
• Establishing stratum specific sample size targets and daily monitoring both
scheduling and testing status with regard to those targets.
• Daily communications with BKI and ERG using the projects online scheduling
system (monitoring scheduled participants and testing status).
• Use of a "continuous improvement" operations model in which the early vehicle
recruitment performance will be used to fine-tune the overbooking factor (and, if
necessary, adjust incentive offerings).
As mentioned above, an online scheduling system will be developed that will facilitate transfer
of information between NuStats and onsite testing staff. This system will allow for scheduling of
vehicles for testing in order to ensure cohort sampling goals are met. For a given day, NuStats
will be able to specify, at minimum, the following information for each vehicle:
• Vehicle License Plate
• Owner Name
• Owner Address
• Owner Phone Number
• Owner Alternate Phone Number
• Incentive Offered
• Last Contact Date
• Miscellaneous NuStats Comments
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
24 of 83
Onsite technicians will be able to access information on the system via the internet to assist with
contact of participants as necessary. During the course of testing, onsite staff will be able to
update the following information to reflect current testing status:
• Test Completion Status
• "Drive-away" PAMS information, if selected
• Incentive paid
• Miscellaneous Onsite Team Comments
Control systems are in place to ensure the security of data transmission and handling, with a
network security system that prevents loss of information (and the resultant loss in quality) due
to system failures or human errors. Information regarding quality on any given research project
are used to signal that collection procedures or tools should be changed in future projects.
2.1.2 Instrument Design
Questionnaires are designed with the following in mind: the statistical requirements of the
project, the administrative requirements of data collection organization, the requirements for data
processing and the nature and characteristics of the respondent population (such as identifying
the correct incentive level to ensure adequate participation). Good questionnaires impose low
respondent burden while remaining both respondent and interviewer-friendly. Survey design
will maximize the efficiency of data collection, with a minimum number of errors, while
facilitating the coding and capture of data and minimizing the amount of editing and imputation
that is required.
Introductions to the questionnaire will provide the subject of the research project, identify the
sponsor or authority on whose behalf the project has been undertaken, explain the purpose,
request the respondent's cooperation, how the research data will be used, and what
confidentiality protection will be afforded. The opening questions will be applicable to all
respondents, easy and interesting to complete, and establish that the respondent is a member of
the target population.
A wide range of methods will be used to test and evaluate the study instrument(s). In this case a
pilot test was conducted to gain insight on the incentives that will be necessary to ensure
participation in the vehicle testing. It also provided insight into how respondents react to the
questionnaire (e.g., help identify poor question wording, errors in questionnaire layout or
instructions, and problems caused by the respondents' inability or unwillingness to answer the
questions).
Even prior to conducting the pilot survey or the surveys in Phase I or II, a pretest was conducted
for each (as part of interviewer training) that served as a "dress rehearsal" to observe how all the
survey operations, including the administration of the questionnaire, worked together in practice.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
25 of 83
A figure depicting data flow for the survey instrument is presented in Figure 2-1.
Figure 2-1. Survey Instrument Data Flowchart
RDD
MARC
—
CAT!
RctruMmersl
Incentive
Tesi
W3
M
u
_c
ii
>
S
Advance l
M?*il f"*i't •• |»
; 2
Advance ' :
Mail Out
3
Advance **
Mail Out
Schedule Testing
Packet
Mail Out
BK.1 Sup
(Reschedules &
Report
Reminder
Call
lort
Feedback
<»
Schedule &
Incentives
Reports
i
p
Testing
2.1.3 Response and Nonresponse
Response patterns of two types are monitored under QA guidelines. Item response pertains to
the number of data items answered by a respondent; unit response pertains to the number of
sampled units that responded at all to the survey. Households will be considered non-responders
if:
• they do not provide all vehicle information (year, make, model, and fuel type),
• they do not provide a mailable home address for delivery of the testing packet, or
• they miss more than two scheduled appointments.
Despite best efforts to maximize response, some nonresponse is virtually certain to occur.
Nonresponse has two effects on the data: it contributes to an increase in the sampling variance of
estimates as the effective sample size is reduced from that originally sought, and it contributes to
bias of estimates when nonrespondents differ from respondents in the characteristics measured.
For these reasons, response rates will be optimized to the degree that budget and time constraints
allow.
To optimize response rates, research projects are designed to allow data to be provided using
methods and formats that are convenient for respondents - not the survey organization. Since
differences between respondents and nonrespondents can cause biases in the estimates, attempts
are always made to determine if such differences exist. Although difficult to determine, this is
done by linking to external data sources (for example, estimates from the U.S. Bureau of the
Census), and by examining the responses of the nonrespondents who were converted with
reluctance or during follow-up activities.
With client consent, one of two methods of compensating for nonresponse will be used: by
means of sampling weight adjustment or through the use of imputation. For all projects,
response and nonresponse rates will be reported using guidelines from established agencies (such
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
26 of 83
as the Council of American Survey Research Organizations or the American Association for
Public Opinion Research).
2.1.4 Data Acquisition Methods
Data acquisition is any process whose purpose is to acquire or assist in the collection of data.
Collection is often the most costly part of the survey process with significant influence on data
quality. The effective use of available technology promotes improvement of the efficiency and
quality of the data collection process. One example of this is the Computer Assisted Telephone
Interviewing (CATI) technology that will be used in this study to interview respondents and
collect data.
Interviewing is always done with surveyors who have the appropriate training and tools. As was
addressed previously, prior to the initiation of the pilot study or either of the two phases of data
collection, a training manual will be developed specifically for this study that includes
background on the project, the objectives of the study, and a question-by-question guide that
describes what will be asked of the respondents. This includes definitions of the incentives and
other technical terminology. Each interviewer will participate in a training session that includes
2 hours conducting mock interviews before actually beginning the survey process. If the survey
will be conducted in another language than English, interviewers will also participate in mock
interviews in the alternative language as well. All training will be monitored and only those staff
that exhibit mastery of the task will be allowed to conduct the survey.
Each data collection shift is monitored by an experienced data collection manager assigned to
this project. These individuals track productivity, listen in and observe interviewers, and provide
continual support to improve interviewer productivity. The EPA Project Manager or others are
welcome to "listen-in" or visit the survey operations center to observe interviewing at any time.
Automated systems have been designed for measuring the quality and productivity of
interviewing during every interviewing shift. Important data collection quality measures include
refusal rates, interview completion rates, frequency of editing rejects, and number and type of
corrections applied to the data. For this study, data review processes that provide feedback
reports will be relied upon for managers and surveyors that contain information on frequencies of
and causes of errors. Examples of these reports include daily productivity reports. So that the
EPA Project Manager can adequately monitor the study's progress on a daily basis during data
collection, a password protected website can be set up for client access to monitor key
productivity variables such as interview completion rates, cohort or quota completion, and other
data.
2.2 Data Processing and Management (Review, Validation, and Verification)
2.2.1 Editing
Data editing is the application of checks that identify missing, invalid, or inconsistent entries or
that point to data records that are potentially in error. In this study, the goals of editing are three-
fold: to provide the basis for future improvements in survey designs and implementation (for
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
27 of 83
Phases I and II), to provide information about the quality of the survey data, and to tidy up the
data for analysis.
While fatal errors (e.g., invalid or inconsistent entries) should be removed from the data sets in
order to maintain our credibility and to facilitate further automated data processing and analysis,
our culture guards against over editing which is not only costly in terms of financing, timeliness,
and increased response burden, but can also lead to severe biases resulting from "changing"
respondent reported information to fit some implicit model of data correctness.
Data is processed in a continuous fashion under a continuous data flow (CDF) model, which
enables the moving of the editing step to the early stages of the survey process so that we can
look upstream to reduce errors rather than cleaning up at the end. In editing data, automated
procedures (such as edit check programs) are relied upon to the degree possible because with
them editing can be done more expediently. Manual procedures are responsible for the high cost
of editing, and we strive to find an appropriate balance between error detection and cost.
We typically work in conjunction with the client to identify the priorities for data editing,
according to types or severity of errors or according to the importance of the variable or the
reporting unit. We assign a high priority to learning from the editing process so that error
prevention rather than error correction is the norm.
2.2.2 Imputation
Imputation is the process used to resolve problems of missing, invalid, or inconsistent responses
identified during editing. This is done by changing some of the responses or missing values on
the record being edited to ensure that a plausible, internally coherent record is created. Data will
only be imputed with the client's consent. Imputed values are flagged in the data set and clearly
identify the methods and sources of imputation. The unimputed and imputed values of the
record's fields are retained for evaluation purposes.
2.2.3 Estimation
Estimation is the process that consists of assigning values to unknown population parameters
using information from the data set. The parameters that are to be estimated can mostly be
expressed as functions of population totals. Examples include simple descriptive statistics as
well as more complicated analytical statistics such as regression coefficients. The quality of the
computed estimates is in large part dependent on the preceding steps. Proper estimation
conforms to the sampling design. To that end, sampling weights are incorporated in the
estimation process. We attempt to keep statistical adjustments for nonresponse to a minimum
because they may introduce a bias. Estimated standard errors or coefficients of variation are
provided when reporting point estimates (e.g., a mean value) as a measure of precision. If
appropriate, confidence intervals are provided.
2.2.4 Data Quality Evaluation
Data quality evaluation is the process of evaluating the final product in light of the original
objectives of the statistical activity, in terms of the data's accuracy and reliability. Such
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
28 of 83
information allows clients to make more informed interpretations of the survey results and is
used to improve the way surveys are designed and implemented.
Data quality evaluations must meet the following minimum requirements: a measure of
coverage error, a response rate and / or imputation rate, and measures of item nonresponse rates
and / or sampling error for key characteristics. Managerial discretion is used to determine the
appropriate amount of data quality evaluation for a given study. Factors considered include the
uses of the data, the potential for error and its significance to the use of the data, the cost of the
evaluation relative to the cost of the study, and whether or not the survey will be repeated or not.
Internal methods to evaluate data quality include:
• Checks of consistency with external sources of data,
• Internal consistency checks, for example calculation of ratios that are know to lie
within certain bounds (e.g., sex ratios, trip rate estimates),
• Unit-by-unit reviews of the largest contributions to errors in estimates (e.g.,
geocoding precision),
• Calculation of data quality indicators such as nonresponse rates, imputation rates,
and coefficients of variation,
• Debriefings with staff involved in the collection and processing of the data.
Sources of errors that are considered for evaluation include the following:
• Coverage errors, which consist of omission, erroneous inclusions, and
duplications in the frame used to conduct the survey.
• Nonresponse errors, which occur when the survey fails to get a response to one,
possibly all, of the questions.
• Measurement errors, which occur when the response received differs from the
"true" value and can be caused by the respondent, the interviewer, the
questionnaire, the mode of collection, or the respondent's record-keeping system.
Such errors can be random in nature, or can introduce a systematic bias into the
results.
• Processing errors, which can occur at the subsequent steps of data editing, coding,
capture, imputation, and tabulation.
• Sampling errors, which occur when the results of a survey are based on a sample
of the population rather than the entire population.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
29 of 83
2.3 Data Reporting and Presentation
2.3.1 Disclosure Control
Strict practices are observed to ensure and protect respondent data confidentiality. Team
members adhere to practices advocated by the Council of American Survey Research
Organizations and the American Association of Public Opinion Research. The following steps
make up our confidentiality protection protocol:
• All project staff are given explicit training in the need to uphold confidentiality
protocols and commitments. We train staff in reasons why this is such an
important responsibility..
• All staff working on a given project (e.g., telephone supervisors and interviewers,
application programmers, data processing staff, etc.) sign legally binding pledges
of confidentiality as part of their employment contract.
• Only those personnel who have signed such pledges will have access to the
confidential data, and then only on an as-needed basis.
• A unique number in the survey response database identifies each study participant
so that names are not associated with responses to questions. Moreover, the data
file containing the link between name and ID number will be stored separately
from the data files containing question responses.
• Telephone numbers and all other potentially identifying information such as
name, address, and SSN are purged from the data files and replaced with case
identification numbers after interviewing and data processing have been
completed.
• All confidential information will be stored in password-protected files by the
holders of this information. Analytic files contain neither names, addresses, nor
telephone numbers.
• During data collection and processing, access to all such files will be scrupulously
controlled and we use a system of passwords to limit access to the files. These
files are not accessible through Internet routes.
• We keep only a minimal amount of respondent-identifiable information is kept in
the data files that are delivered.
• To maintain confidentiality and maximize respondent cooperation, all survey
respondents will be assured that their survey answers will remain confidential and
that no personal information that they give will be individually identified with
them.
2.3.2 Data Analysis
Data analysis is the process of transforming raw data into useable information, often presented in
the form of a published document (typically Microsoft Word) or presentation (typically
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
30 of 83
Microsoft Powerpoint), in order to add value to the statistical output. The basic steps in the
analytic process consist of:
• examining the topic,
• asking meaningful questions,
• developing support for the answers, and
• communicating that story to the reader.
Quality Assurance is exercised in data analysis and reporting by:
• arranging ideas in a logical order and in order of relevance or importance;
• using headings, sub-headings, and sidebars to strengthen the organization of the
report;
• keeping the language as simple as the subject permits;
• using graphs in preference to or in addition to text or tables to communicate the
message; and
• helping readers understand the information in the charts by discussing it in the
text.
When tables are used, special care is taken with the overall format, spacing, and the wording,
placement, and appearance of the titles, row and column headings, and other labeling that
contribute to the clarity of the data in the tables and prevents misinterpretation. All tables and
graphs define the base used for the rates, and use only the number of significant digits that add to
the utility of the data.
All reports and presentations are checked for consistency of figures used in the text, tables and
charts, verification of the accuracy of external data, and simple arithmetic.
2.3.3 Documentation
Documentation constitutes a record of the statistical activity, including the underlying concepts,
definitions, and methods used in the production of the data. It serves as a record for clients of
what was done in order to provide a context for effective and informed use of the data. The level
of detail provided in the documentation will depend on its intended audience, the type of data
collection, the data sources, the analysis, range and impact of uses of the data, and the total
budget of the study.
Documentation may include the following:
• Objectives;
• Content of the questionnaire;
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
31 of 83
Tests of the questionnaire and the process;
Methodological overview and discussion of technical issues;
Data systems (data files structures, algorithms used to construct or define
variables, weighting and expansion factors);
Results of monitoring reports;
Operations issues (training, feedback or debriefing reports;
Implementation steps and challenges;
Quality control indicators; and
Data quality measures.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
32 of 83
SECTION 3: DAY ONE VEHICLE INSPECTION AND CONDITIONING
The next two sections are organized temporally to follow an individual vehicle through the
testing and analytical process. The flowchart presented in Figure 3-1 depicts the process.
Figure 3-1. Summary of Daily Activities
Begin Vehicle Testing - DAY
Begin Vch clc Testing - DAY 2
v ir
*',.&,,,- ,* k i
No ^-"Receive vch,ele^\
Reject """r""
Vehicle f>es
s^ Take Video of ^\
S^ Vehicle -Major \.
., ^^ Repair Needed? -*^"
Aeeep! Veruele From ^ r
uwner - Swyp wsih
KciUaltiu ^ I ertorrn Minur
,r ^^ Perform ^\
j ^ ^x' Cortdittonina Run - x
Install PEMS for — K. Acceplawc? /
C'onditiomne Run ^\ ^^
\. /^ Ho
Rejecl
Yes Vehicle
For Visual Smoke < Q("M
I
-T • v t
Classify Vehicle as Urn, Preparaiior, for
Eminer
/^ tio to Vehicle \
( 1'estuig Da>' 2 W—
^rlonn Inslru 'ncnl
Blanking Proccduri; i
Mount and Secure
Vehicle on
l r
Perform 3 Bag /
C\ ck
IF
Attach Existing PEMS Unit
i\\\\\\ Dilution ' 'unnel
Intake)
Measure Real Time Mass&
t'ilemenial Carbon ws {[£ cnicnlu Analysis. -X'.'CK', kms. SV()Cr
Gaseous Air Tox cs-Sumnia -t- DNPH Sample)
IF
Disconnect Vehicle
ljrom Insirunienis
ir
E! Se ectcd
30-MiEiute
/ Return lo Vehicle \
/ Pilot Testing or \
Vchicc Icsnng ]-_
Task ^
V /
Record Smoke Video
if Necessary
ir
Drive Vehicle Off
. >namomeu!r
At midday, take lunne
^ hianks- Ai F-nd of Da%
Cycle Heated Air
Through System
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
33 of 83
3.1 Vehicle Inspection
A number of vehicle inspections and vehicle data gathering activities are required to be
performed during this study, in order to obtain vehicle information for the MSOD data table
EQUIP_IN.dbf Documentation for these activities may take the form of videotapes, interview
questionnaires, checklists, hard copy data forms, and computer files. Each vehicle will receive a
unique identification code which will be used to track documentation as it is gathered in the
field.
While the vehicle is on site, all paper documentation generated will be maintained in a file folder
inside the vehicle. Once the vehicle is returned to the owner, the vehicle documentation folder
will be stored in a designated file cabinet located at the test site for the duration of the study, and
at an offsite facility after the conclusion of the study. All vehicle data will be transferred to
magnetic media to facilitate inclusion in the study database.
A staff member will be designated to co-ordinate all vehicle inspection procedures. The vehicle
inspection coordinator will assign additional staff to perform many of the inspections. The
coordinator will also review collected vehicle data to insure completeness and accuracy. Types
of vehicle inspections to be performed are listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1. Vehicle Inspections
Inspection Type
Initial Acceptance Inspection
Owner Questionnaire
Video Tape
MSOD Compliant Vehicle Data Form
OBD Scan
Visual
Purpose
To insure safety and test worthiness
Query for fuel and oil types
Document pre-existing damages
VIN, Engine family, Model, etc.
OBD data
Smoke observations
Forms and checklists pertaining to the inspections listed above are provided in for reference
Appendix A.
3.2 Vehicle Repair
Each test vehicle will be evaluated for repairs recently performed and for repairs which may
need to be performed. The latter will serve primarily to ensure the vehicle can be safely operated
on the road and dynamometer. If repairs are required, the vehicle owner will be notified and
his/her permission will be obtained before repairs are performed. If the repairs cannot be
performed by on-site personnel, the vehicle will be taken to a local repair shop by on-site
personnel. Records of the repair will be maintained in the vehicle folder and a brief narrative of
the repair will also be included. Repairs will also be documented in table sets associated with
REPAR_IN.DBF in the MSOD. Following repair, the vehicle will be outfitted in the normal
fashion, conditioned, and cued for testing.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
34 of 83
Minor repairs that may be performed may include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Replacement of unsafe, worn tires.
2. Replacement of belts or hoses.
3. Replenishment of fluids.
4. Brake service.
5. Replacement/repair of emission control components (oxygen sensor, EGR valve,
etc.), so long as a short break-in period (approximately 100 miles) is feasible prior
to testing.
Major repairs (either recently performed on the vehicle, or that the vehicle may require) that
would cause us to exclude a vehicle from the test program may include, but are not limited to,
the following:
1. Replacement of exhaust system. New exhaust systems would have to be
conditioned for quite some time (> 300 miles) to remove cutting oils. These oils
could bias the PM results.
2. Replacement of Catalyst. Conditioning of approximately 5000 miles would be
required to age the catalyst.
3. Engine or engine component replacement or rebuild within the last 5000 miles
(Including heads, valves, block, etc).
3.3 Vehicle Conditioning Run
Each test vehicle will be prepped the day before testing on a predetermined route that includes
high speed accelerations, driving at freeway speeds, and driving at stop and go traffic patterns.
This route is described in detail in Appendix A.
Prior to the conditioning run, a PEMS unit will be installed on the vehicle to monitor emission.
The PEMS unit used for the preconditioning drive will undergo full a complete warm-up, zero
and audit sequence to verify CO, CO2, NOx, and THC measurement accuracy. Calibrations will
be performed as necessary to bring the PEMS into proper calibration. The concentrations and
accuracy of all gasses used for auditing and calibrating will be recorded, and data files will be
generated during all audits to preserve records of system accuracy and calibrations. All PEMS
system flows and pressures will be verified and recorded, and ambient conditions as measured by
the PEMS will be recorded and verified with independent measurements. A sample system leak
check will be performed to verify sample system integrity, and a FID fuel leak check will also be
performed. System temperatures (FID oven and chiller) will also be verified and recorded, and
all sample rates and transport delay settings will be verified. Detailed installation guidelines,
along with a checklist for the installation procedure, QC requirements are provided in Appendix
A. This vehicle prep will be conducted for about 45 minutes. After the prep each vehicle will be
soaked overnight for testing the next day. The dynamometer will be thoroughly warmed for at
least 30 minutes and a coastdown will be performed at a specified load to check for
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
35 of 83
dynamometer load and inertia problems. Alternate vehicle prep and conditioning procedures
may be used to meet specific field study goals. Inertia will be set before the vehicle is chained
down. Both inertia and load for a particular vehicle model and year will be taken from tables
supplied by EPA. Table inertia values will be rounded to the nearest available setting on the
dynamometer.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
36 of 83
SECTION 4: DAY TWO VEHICLE TESTING
4.1 Sampling Equipment
PEMS
Once the vehicle is mounted on the dynamometer, a PEMS unit will be installed on the vehicle to
monitor undiluted emissions. Detailed installation guidelines, along with a checklist for the
installation procedure, are provided in Appendix A.
Constant Volume Sampling (CVS)
Positive Displacement Pump-Constant Volume Sampling (PDP-CVS) system is used to dilute
and transport the vehicle tailpipe exhaust to analyzers during the test. The PDP-CVS system
employs an 8-inch diameter dilution tunnel with filtered dilution air. This system is graphically
depicted in Figure 4-1. The CVS flow rate is sized to prevent water condensation over the range
of ambient conditions and vehicle engine displacements encountered during testing. The
existing test cell PDF is limited to about 540 SCFM. A spreadsheet model is available to
accurately calculate second-by-second CVS water concentrations and dew points during transient
speed tests. This model can be used to define the CVS system operating conditions (flow rates,
temperatures) as a function of dilution air temperature and humidity, and vehicle emissions, that
are necessary to avoid water condensation. A dilution air heater will also be used to avoid water
condensation and loss of organic emissions in the sampling system. Condensed water will
influence sampling system organic compound losses and can deteriorate sampling system flow
control.
Figure 4-1. CVS Sampling System Schematic
to aldehyde wmplo
dilution air
filter from vohicic
/• [alppe
I ^V__^A— Dilute
•
Air condmflnfir
whausl
coll.clion bags
* ^ i *
high CO NCd an
1 anafyzix I
COIwsym
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
37 of 83
The diluted exhaust is transported to the chemical analytical instrumentation through 1/4 inch
O.D. tubing that is either heated (220° to 240°) to prevent water condensation, or when the
compounds being analyzed are not water soluble (e.g., CO, NO), through a cryogenic water trap.
The sample probes are located at least 10 tunnel diameters downstream from the position where
the vehicle exhaust first encounters dilution air. Sample line flow rates must be adequate to
achieve instrument response suitable for "real-time" measurement of the concentrations of the
exhaust components of interest. Continuously integrated emission analyzers are required to have
a response time of 1.5 seconds or less to 90% of a step change in concentration, where a step
change is 60% of full scale or better. System response times between a step change at the sample
probe position in the CVS tunnel and reading 90% of the change must be less than 10 seconds.
Integrated bag samples may also be collected for each test phase permitting comparison of
analytical results with those obtained by integration of the observed "real time" concentrations.
The potential for HC measurement artifacts exist resulting from absorption and subsequent
release of HC from the dilution tunnel walls. As part of the dilution tunnel conditioning process,
the dilution air heater and PDF are turned on at least 45 minutes prior to the days first test to
purge the exhaust transfer line and dilution tunnel. Pumps at the analytical bench are also run to
purge all sample lines. The PDF, dilution air heater and sample pumps run continuously (not shut
down between tests) until conclusion of the days testing. Dilution tunnel HC concentrations are
also monitored between tests to ensure that they return to ambient levels. Testing will not resume
until dilution tunnel HC concentrations are within 15% of the ambient concentration.
CVS sample probes are designed to assure that continuous and adequate volume of sample is
collected for analysis. Background and dilute exhaust sample line flows are monitored to assure
no malfunction causing inadequate sample flow or analyzer response time deterioration such that
time correlation for each emission constituent is no longer valid. The sample system will have
an easily replaceable filter element to prevent particulate matter from reducing the reliability of
the analytical system. The filter element will provide reliable sealing after filter element is
changed. When the sample line is heated, the filter system is also heated.
The duct for transferring exhaust from the vehicle tailpipe to the CVS should be maintained as
short as possible. The design should not cause static pressure in the tailpipe to change such that
the emission levels are significantly affected. A change of ±1.0 inch of water or less, as
measured at the tailpipe, is acceptable. For dual exhaust systems, the design must insure that
each leg maintains equal flow. Equal flow will be assumed if each leg is approximately equal in
length ± 1 foot, and the area at the end of each leg is approximately equal.
All materials in contact with exhaust gas should be unaffected by and not affect the sample (i.e.,
the materials should not react with the sample, and neither should they taint the sample as a
result of outgassing). Acceptable materials include stainless steel, Teflon ®, silicon rubber, and
Tedlar®.
Continuous Measurements
In addition to the regulated gas pollutants measured by BKI, DRI will provide continuous
measurements of PM mass using an EPA-supplied Brooker Systems Model RPM-101 Quartz
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
38 of 83
Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and Thermo-MIE Inc. DataRam 4000 Nephelometer. Black carbon
will be measured continuously with a DRI photoacoustic instrument and integrated samples will
be collected and analyzed by DRI for PM gravimetric mass, elements, elemental and organic
carbon, ions, particulate and semi-volatile organic compounds, volatile organic air toxics
(benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethylbenzene, styrene, 1,3-butadiene, n-hexane, naphthalene, fo
The samples will be extracted from the BKI dilution tunnel through a low particulate loss 2.5 um
cut point pre-classifier. The sample will be isokinetically partitioned among the continuous
instruments and integrated air samples using a suitable sample distribution manifold. Separate
Teflon and quartz filters will be collected for each of the three phases of the Unified Driving
Cycle (UDC) using a sequential sampler. All other integrated samples will be collected over all
three phases of the cycle, excluding the 10-minute soak period between phases 2 and 3.
The dynamometer dilution air will be dehumidified and heated to 47°C during testing. No
residence chamber will be used for integrated samples and sampling streams will be maintained
at 47°C. Photoacoustic instrument is an exception since it is designed to operate at below 35°C
and black carbon concentrations should not be affected by temperature. The dilution tunnel will
be purged between tests for a minimum of 30 minutes. PM mass will be monitored to ensure that
background levels have stabilized after the prescribed purge period. A 60-minute dilution tunnel
blank are collected once per day at the middle of the day.
Figure 4-2 presents a schematic of the sampling instrumentation.
4.2 Calibration of Equipment
Each piece of equipment or instrument will be calibrated and maintained to ensure accuracy
within specified limits. Calibration and maintenance procedures are detailed in the Team
Technical Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Manual. A copy of this and any other
appropriate SOPs will be kept on-site. The equipment used by onsite personnel to collect
samples will be calibrated according to Federal Register requirements (when applicable),
manufacturer's procedures, or internal guidelines at recommended intervals. An equipment
logbook will be kept on file that contains the calibration procedures and the results of each
calibration, and will also serve as a permanent record of maintenance for the sampling
equipment. This document will be available for review, if so requested.
4.2.1 Dynamometer, CVS, and Gas Analysis Equipment
SOPs for calibration are typically designated in the analytical methodology to be used but will be
also be outlined in the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual. Calibrations are also performed at
regular intervals by onsite personnel. Calibrations to be performed for onsite equipment are
presented in Table 4-1.
-------
Figure 4-2. Kansas City Exhaust Measurement Flowchart
Revision 4
8/1/2006
39 of 83
fE>l6w MEMBRANE" •
gravimetric mate and
_sHeraenLalar,iily}i}l4yi.
OUARTZFILfER-ECiOC
and ions (Alb)
flGF/XAD-PMarriSVOC
CMHSfERs'wrtJOs
DENUDER - VOC
...SCSPSSQJ1.IA3S1
DNPH EARTRIDGES -
canxnyls
-------
Figure 4-3. Testing Facility Layout
Revision 4
8/1/2006
40 of 83
Front Garage Doors
Public Parking
Office Entrance
H "I
Office Area
SEMTECH-G:
Undiluted exhaust samples
Dynamometer
&CVS:
Fuel samples
Back Garage Doors
Various:
PM
Gases
Toxics
Property Cage
I I H
Secure Parking
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
41 of 83
Table 4-1. Calibration and Performance Checks of Test Equipment and Analytical
Instrumentation
Parameter
CFR Procedure
Time Period
DYNAMOMETER
Calibration
Performance Check
86.118.78
86.118.78(b)
Initial
Daily
CONSTANT VOLUME SAMPLER (PDP-CVS)
CVS system verification
86.119.90(c)
monthly
THC ANALYZER
Response Optimization
Multipoint calibration
Zero and Span Check
*Blind Audit Sample
86.121.90(a)
86.121.90(b)
86.140-94
-
Initial
initial/monthly
pre/post test
as available
CARBON MONOXIDE ANALYZER
H^O and CO2 interference check
Multipoint calibration
Zero and Span Check
*Blind Audit Sample
86.122-78(a)
86.122-78(b)
86.140.94
-
Initial
Initial/monthly
pre/post test
as available
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ANALYZER
Multipoint calibration
Zero and Span Check
*Blind Audit Sample
86.123-78(b)
86.140.94
-
Initial/monthly
pre/post test
as available
CARBON DIOXIDE ANALYZER
Multipoint calibration
Zero and Span Check
* Blind Audit Sample
86.124-78
86.140-94
-
Initial/monthly
pre/post test
as available
* If available
When any of the parameters, accuracy and/or precision exceeds applicable boundaries (as
specified in the CFR procedures listed above), then vehicle testing will cease and an
investigation will be conducted to determine the cause of the problem. Testing will resume only
when the problem is corrected and the parameter values are within the stated QC objectives.
Instrument drift over a period of time, such as the time between calibration and sample analysis,
is considered a component of measurement accuracy and must be reported. The precision is
defined by evaluating the degree of mutual agreement among individual measurements made
under prescribed like conditions.
The following narrative demonstrates SOPs and research protocol methods (RPMs) for some of
the more critical instrumentation and test methods to be used in this project. The calibrations are
included for the dynamometer operation, as well as calibrations for each of the instruments
involved in the project.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
42 of 83
Dynamometer Calibration
To ensure proper dynamometer simulation, speed and torque measurement and readout systems
will be periodically calibrated. A suggested calibration schedule would include calibration just
prior to transport to the field and then again just after initial setup in the field. In addition,
calibrations shall be performed when daily coastdown tests so indicate the need.
Calibration of Dynamometer Roll Speed
Dynamometer speed will be calibrated using a Phototachometer to determine roll rpm. Using a
vehicle to motor the dynamometer at a constant speed, the roll rpm shall be measured and the
corresponding speed in mph determined. Simultaneous readings will be taken from the
dynamometer's speed meter. Initial calibrations will be made at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 MPH.
Thereafter, daily calibration checks will be made at 50 MPH. Detailed instructions on speed
signal calibration and adjustments are found in section 1.4.2 of the operator's manual.
Torque Cell Calibration
The dynamometer torque cell will be calibrated using the dead weight method as described in
detail in section 1.4.3 of the operator's manual. A torque arm arbor and 3 weights are provided
for this purpose.
Coastdowns
Coastdown tests are conducted for two purposes: 1) To establish a reference table of actual vs.
indicated horsepower @ 50 MPH, and 2) to verify dynamometer calibration on a daily basis. A
new reference table of actual vs. indicated horsepower @ 50 MPH will be made any time
mechanical components of the dynamometer (including PAU fluid) are changed or altered. To
construct the table, a series of coastdown tests will be performed at a variety of inertia and load
settings. Coastdown times obtained are used to compute actual horsepower, which are in turn
compared to indicate horsepower (by polynomial regression) to generate the table. Thereafter,
coastdown tests will be performed on a daily basis (beginning of each day) on a thoroughly
warmed up dynamometer. Daily coastdown times will agree within 1 second of reference times.
If not, corrective action will be taken. As an initial step, speed and torque cell calibrations will be
checked.
The coastdown test will be performed as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 40
part 86. Speed trigger points of 55 and 45 mph are used. In order to perform a coastdown test, a
vehicle will be used to motor the rolls to a speed above the high trigger point. At that time, the
vehicle will be raised and the rolls allowed to coast down from 55 to 45 MPH. Coastdown time
will be recorded and used to calculate horsepower absorbed @ 50 MPH. Detailed instructions on
conducting the coastdown tests are given in Section 1.4.4 of the operator's manual.
For special high speed cycles, trigger points of 70 and 15 mph are used. In performing these
special coastdown tests, a vehicle will be used to motor the rolls to a speed above the high trigger
point, usually 73 mph. At that time, the vehicle is raised and the rolls allowed to coast down
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
43 of 83
from 70 to 15 mph. Coastdown time will be recorded and used to calculate speed vs. load curves
for 70 to 15 mph.
Maintenance
Maintenance of the dynamometer will be carried out on a routine basis. Periodic checkups will
occur at 1000-hour intervals or annually. Maintenance will be carried out in accordance with the
Clayton Instruction Manual.
All laboratory equipment is on a preventative maintenance schedule. The most important
preventative maintenance tool is the systematic performance check of the instruments. When an
instrument is not performing to standards, the problem is investigated and corrected before it
becomes significant.
All major laboratory equipment (GC/MSs, HPLC, ASE extractor) are on service contracts with
the original manufacturer (Varian, Waters, Dionex, respectively). The contracts provide annual
or biannual preventative maintenance by the manufacturer's service technician and immediate
on-site response to any service call within 48 hours of notification of the manufacturer.
Several laboratory personnel have extensive experience working with all the major laboratory
equipment, and extensive support facilities (electronics and machine shops, and QA lab with
standard reference materials, etc.) are available. These personnel and facilities ensure the
continued operation of all analytical laboratory instruments.
CVS Operation
The CVS system consists of an 8-inch dilution tunnel, particulate/charcoal inlet filter, and a
positive displacement pump (PDF) operated to draw approximately 540 CFM of diluted exhaust
gas through the system. Flow through the system during a test phase is a function of the volume
swept per pump revolution, pump rpm, and the inlet pressure and temperature. Therefore,
measurement of these four variables is needed to correctly calculate the flow.
Calibration of CVS
Volume per pump revolution, or Vo, is determined from propane injections that are conducted
periodically in accordance with 86.119-78 paragraph (c) of 40 CFR July 1, 1983. Under normal
circumstances, Vo, once determined, is not subject to change. The temperature and pressure
measurements at the blower inlet will be taken using transducers which are periodically
calibrated to insure accurate and precise values. PDF rpm will not be measured on a per test
basis, but will be checked periodically (at least once daily) using a phototachometer.
Preventative Maintenance
The CVS dilution air filter pak will be changed whenever the pressure drop across the filter
becomes excessive. This condition occurs when it is no longer possible to maintain exhaust line
pressure within +/- 6 inches of water.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
44 of 83
Driving Cycle Simulation
The test vehicle will be operated by a driver over a specified driving schedule on the
dynamometer. The driver will follow a speed vs time trace on a driver's aid which establishes a
speed error band within which vehicle speeds are controlled. Following the test, an indication
will be given of the number of driver violations. A violation occurs when the vehicle speed is
outside the error band for two or more seconds. Generally, violations resulting from inability of
the vehicle to keep up with the test cycle will be disregarded.
Drivers Aid Speed Check
At the time the dynamometer speed calibration is carried out, indicated speed on the driver's aid
will also be checked. Zero and span adjustments to the driver's aid will be made if the driver's
aid speed signal does not agree with actual speed.
Measurement of Diluted Exhaust Gases
The four routinely measured automobile or truck exhaust emissions are HC, CO, CO2, and NOx.
Concentrations of these gases will be measured in exhaust gas which has been diluted with a
constant volume sampler (CVS). During the test, concentrations in diluted exhaust will be
measured and logged on a real time basis (1 sample per second). At the conclusion of a test,
with the vehicle's engine off, the ambient air will also be measured for background
concentrations of HC, CO, CO2, and NOx. Average gaseous concentrations per test will be
computed, background corrected and used per the CFR 40, for mass emission determination.
Calibration of Exhaust Gas Analyzer
All analyzers used in the measurement of HC, CO, NOx, and CO2 shall be calibrated in
accordance with requirements 86.121-82, 86.122-78, 86.123-78, and 86.124-78 respectively, all
of which can be found in 40 CFR July 1, 1983. These procedures include periodic multipoint
calibrations using NIST gases and zero and single point span checks before each dynamometer
test.
Operation and Maintenance of Exhaust Gas Analyzers
All analyzers shall be operated and maintained in accordance with their respective operating
manuals. Deviations from these procedures will be documented in the Lab Notebook.
Analytical Gases
Analytical gases must meet the requirements of 86.114-94 of 40 CFR July 1, 1998. Accordingly,
calibration gases in the laboratory are traceable within 1 percent of NIST gases, while span gases
will be accurate to within 2 percent of true concentration (NIST gases). The reference followed
for naming cylinder gases as calibration standards is EPA Protocol No. 2 which is entitled
"Traceability Protocol for Establishing True Concentrations of Gases Used for Calibration and
Audits of Air Pollution Analyzers", June 15, 1978.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
45 of 83
Multipoint Calibrations
All regulated emissions instrumentation will be subjected to monthly multipoint calibrations to
ensure response linearity. THC, FIDs, and NOX chemiluminescent analyzers are inherently
linear over the analysis ranges normally used, while CO and CO2 NDIRs are linearized by
electronic methods and therefore subject to drift. Procedures for multipoint calibration are
identical for each method. The response of each analyzer will be adjusted for appropriate
response to zero gas and a full-scale calibration gas. With no further adjustments, down-scale
concentrations will be introduced to the instrument and responses recorded. Down-scale
concentrations of 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, and 10% of full scale will be generated by
dynamically diluting the full-scale calibration gas with a 10-point gas divider. Linear regression
techniques will be used to define a best-fit linear curve to the data. Actual concentrations for
each down-scale point will then be compared to concentrations calculated from instrument
response and curve coefficients. If the calculated concentration deviates by more than 2% from
the actual concentration, corrective action is required.
Zero/Span
Immediately before analysis of the CVS bags, each instrument will be zeroed and spanned by
using appropriate zero and span gas. Span gases will be accurate to ±2% of true concentration (as
referenced to NIST standards). Prior to zeroing and spanning, the CVS sample will be "sniffed"
to ensure analysis will be done on the proper instrument range. Range control, zero/span, and
analysis of the CVS bags are automated to reduce potential for operator error.
Analytical Systems
Prior to analysis, analytical systems (i.e., GC/ECD/FID, HPLC, GC/MS, and GC/IRD/MSD) are
checked for purity and are certified clean (less than 0.1 ppbv of targeted compound). Quality
control in the laboratory includes instrument calibration for each batch of samples analyzed,
replicates of standards, and analysis of approximately 10% of the samples for estimate of
analytical precision (historically less than 6%).
Primary reference standards are traceable to a NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM). For
canister hydrocarbon speciation by GC/FID, a NIST SRM 1805 is used consisting of 254 ppb of
benzene in nitrogen. In addition, NIST SRM 2764 (245 ppb of propane in air) is used for
calibrating the light hydrocarbon analytical system. For halogenated compound measurements, a
NIST-traceable standard mixture of 39 compounds is purchased from Scott Specialty Gases and
diluted for calibration. For VOC measurements by the GC/MS system, a 74 compound mixture
in low ppb level (Air Environmental, Inc., Denver, CO), traceable to the NIST SRM 1805, is
used for calibration. For PAH measurements, a NIST SRM 1647 with the addition of other
compounds not present in the mixture is used.
Gas cylinders of helium, nitrogen, hydrogen, and ultra zero air (all UUP grade from best sources
available) are used for the analytical systems. From a single analysis, the GC/IRD/MSD system
gives three dimensions of data for positive compound identification: retention times, infrared
spectra, and mass spectra. Unknown compounds are identified by matching corresponding data
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
46 of 83
of known standards. The current inventory of reference samples consists of over 250 single- and
multi-component reference samples and includes most of the compounds of interest in this
project.
The analytical systems are calibrated initially by multipoint calibration (i.e., three levels plus
humid zero air) and checked regularly by a one-point calibration using appropriate NIST SRM or
other standard. The day-to-day reproducibility of ±10% is acceptable for either standard.
Control charts are used for assessing analytical system performance.
Samples that fall outside the calibration range are diluted until bracketed by the calibration
curve. Instrument responses to calibration standards for each parameter are analyzed using a
least squares linear regression. The calibration must generate a correlation co-efficient (R2) of
0.99 to be acceptable.
During the course of analysis, calibration standards are routinely analyzed to ensure that the
instrument response has not changed. The criterion of ±10% of the expected response is used by
the analyst to determine whether the instrument must be recalibrated. Retention time windows
for each analyte are established prior to analysis and re-established continuously throughout the
course of the analytical period.
The QA Manager conducts a field and laboratory systems audits, a laboratory performance audit
and/or interlaboratory comparisons, and four field performance audits. Systems audits examine
all phases of measurement and data processing to determine that the SOPs are followed and that
operational staff is properly trained. The systems audit is intended to be a cooperative
assessment resulting in improved data, rather than a judgmental activity. Performance audits
establish the extent to which data specifications are being achieved in practice and evaluate
measurement accuracy against independent standards. The field systems audit is conducted at
the beginning of the project after all equipment is installed and operating. It will be followed by
the first field performance audit. These audits will identify deficiencies and implement remedial
actions. Subsequent field performance audit results will be used to define accuracy of field
measurements.
Laboratory audits present standards with known concentrations to each laboratory process.
These standards are analyzed according to normal procedures and the results will be compared
with the standard values. In some cases, however, NIST standards are not available (e.g.,
elemental carbon, organic carbon). In such cases, interlaboratory comparisons are an effective
audit tool. Audit strategies, issues, and procedures are described in detail in respective SOPs.
In the case of a failure of a performance or technical systems audit, written notification including
the details of the recommended corrective action will be sent from the audit team to the project
PI and to the QA Manager. The PI - in collaboration with the QA Manager - will determine the
party responsible for taking corrective action and will verify any work completed. All audits will
be reported in the Quality Assurance Final Report, which will be submitted as an attachment to
the Project Final Report.
Analytical procedures that may be required for the accomplishment of the Statement of Work
tasks are listed in Table 4-2. All QC requirements designated in these methods will be met. For
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
47 of 83
required tasks not described in an EPA- or ASTM-approved method, SOPs will be required and
archived. A summary of the SOPs currently in use for these studies is provided in Table 4-2.
These SOPs are stand- alone documents and are not included with this document.
Table 4-2. Standard Operating Procedures to Characterize Emissions
Analytical Measurement
Regulated Emissions
CVS Water Condensation
Thermocouples
Standard Operating Procedure
Federal Register: Standards for Emissions
Procedures for Determining Constant Volume Sampling
System Water Condensation
Procedures for Calibration of Thermocouples
Mr. Richard Snow is responsible for the analytical equipment for the Transportable
Dynamometer system should a failure occur. In the case of an electronic malfunction in the
analytical equipment, the usual repair method is for an onsite technician to contact the equipment
or instrument manufacturer. With the assistance of the manufacture's service departments, Mr.
Snow has successfully performed troubleshooting and repair of analytical equipment. The
assistance of an electronic engineer(s) for troubleshooting instrument problems and diagnosing
individual component problems that may need replacing, such as diodes, resistors, circuit boards
and capacitors, etc is available if necessary. In extreme cases, the manufacturer's service
representative will be required to travel onsite to make the required repairs. The repair of any
analytical equipment will be recorded in the instrument laboratory maintenance logbook. The
entry will describe the problem and remedy.
4.2.2 PEMS
A PEMS unit will be used to concurrently measure vehicle exhaust emissions during
dynamometer testing. This unit will undergo a complete verification, audit, and calibration
sequence (calibration only as necessary), for each vehicle tested. This sequence will be identical
to that as described in Section 3.4. All audit and calibration information will be recorded on data
collection sheets, as shown in Appendix A.
4.3 Sampling Media Preparation and Certification
Teflon and Quartz Filters
Teflon filters are equilibrated for weighing only after they pass acceptance testing by XRF. The
filters are equilibrated for a minimum of four weeks before performing initial weights. At least
two filters from each lot (typically 100 filters) received from the manufacturers are analyzed for
species to verify that pre-established specifications have been met. Lots are rejected if they do
not pass this acceptance test. Each filter is individually examined over a light table prior to use
for discoloration, pinholes, creases, or other defects. In addition to laboratory blanks, 5 to 10% of
all filters will be designated as field blanks to follow handling procedures, except for actual
sampling.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
48 of 83
Quartz fiber filters absorb organic gases from ambient air and organic artifacts from the
manufacturing process. By pre-firing the quartz filters before sampling, these absorbed gases and
artifacts are reduced to constant insignificant levels. The filters are pre-fired in preparation for
thermal/optical reflectance carbon (TOR) analysis, which is a thermal desorption process
subjecting the filters to temperatures between 25°C through 800°C. Therefore, the filters are
pre-fired at 900°C to remove all possible interferences with the TOR analysis. Sets of filters with
levels exceeding 1.5 mg/cm2 for organic carbon and 0.5 mg/cm2 for elemental carbon are re-
fired or rejected. Pre-fired filters are sealed and stored in a freezer prior to preparation for field
sampling.
PUF/XAD/PUF Cartridge and Filter
DRI will also acceptance test TIGF filters and XAD-4 resin packs. XAD-4 is placed in a
Buchner funnel and rinsed with distilled water three times followed by technical grade methanol
3-4 times, and again three times with distilled water. It is then further cleaned by Soxhlet
extraction for 48 hours with methanol, followed by Dionex ASE extraction for 15min/cell with
-170 mL of dichloromethane (CH2C12) and acetone at 1500 psi and 100 C. The XAD-4 is then
dried in a vacuum oven at -15 to -20 in Hg and 50° C. Cleaned XAD-4 is transferred to clean 1L
glass jars and stored in aluminum cans with activated charcoal. The TIGF filters will be cleaned
by sonification in CH2C12 for 30 minutes, followed by another 30-minute sonification in
methanol. Then they will be dried, placed in aluminum foil, and labeled. Each batch of
precleaned XAD-4 resin and -10% of precleaned TIGF filters. The XAD-4 resins are assembled
into glass cartridges (50 g of XAD between two screens), wrapped in aluminum foil and stored
in a clean freezer prior shipment to the field. This procedure is described in detail in the DRI
Standard Operation Procedure: Analysis of Semi-Volatile Organic Compound by GC/MS.
Carbonyl DNPH Cartridges
For commercial 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) cartridges (Waters Sep-Pak XpoSure
Aldehyde Sampler), DRI will analyze 5% of the purchased cartridges to ascertain the blank
variability. Another 5% will be analyzed if the initial data show that the blank variability is
marginally acceptable (at or slightly higher than 1/3 of the desired lower quantifiable limits
(LQL)). This is necessary because unless cartridges are prepared in-house there is no other
indication of the quality of the product, such as reagent and blank cartridge purity. In carbonyl
measurements, the blank variability is the single most important factor in determining the lower
quantifiable limit of the measurement; other factors such as flow rate, and analytical variability
are secondary in importance.
Canister Cleaning and Preparation
Prior to sampling, the canisters will be cleaned by repeated evacuation and pressurization with
humidified zero air, as described in the EPA document "Technical Assistance Document for
Sampling and Analysis of Ozone Precursors" (October 1991, EPA/600-8-91/215). Six
repeatable cycles of evacuation to -0.5 mm Hg absolute pressure followed by pressurization with
UHP humid zero air to -15 psig is used. Our method differs from the EPA method by heating
the canisters to 140°C during the vacuum cycle. At the end of the cleaning procedure, one
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
49 of 83
canister out of the six per lot is filled with humidified UHP zero air and analyzed by the GC/FID
method. The canisters are considered clean if total NMOC concentrations are less than 20 ppbC.
Sampling System Cleaning
Sampling systems with internal surfaces upstream of the collection media (e.g., canister sampler)
must be cleaned and certified for cleanliness prior to sampling. The canister sampling systems
are cleaned prior to field sampling by purging with humidified zero air for 48 hours, followed by
purging with dry UHP zero air for one hour. Each canister sampling system is certified clean by
the GC/FID analysis of humidified zero air collected through this sampling system. The system
is considered clean if the concentration of any individual targeted compound is less than 0.2
ppbv, and total NMOC concentration is less than 10 ppbC. In addition, a QA sample consisting
of a blend of organic compounds of known concentration in clean humidified zero air is
collected through the sampling system and analyzed by the GC/FID method. The sampling
system is considered non-biasing if recoveries of each of the QA compounds are in the range of
80-120% (EPA document EPA/600-8-91/215).
4.4 Testing, Inspection, and Maintenance of Equipment
4.4.1 Dynamometer and Associated Gas Analysis
Prior to deployment in the field, each instrument is bench-tested and inspected in the laboratory.
Maintenance frequency varies depending on instrument. Instrument and equipment testing,
inspection, and maintenance requirements are discussed in detail in the SOPs.
Procedures and schedules for preventive maintenance of field sampling equipment are the
responsibility of onsite personnel. Maintenance procedures and calibrations will be performed
periodically on each piece of analytical laboratory equipment to ensure accuracy within DQOs.
These procedures and frequency of performance are designated in the individual instrument
manuals or in the laboratory Quality Assurance Manual.
4.4.2 PEMS
Prior to project deployment, current firmware will be downloaded onto all PEMS units, and all
host computers will be updated with current operating software. Sampling system filters will be
checked and replaced as necessary. All systems will undergo a full audit and calibration
sequence to ensure they are operating within allowable limits. All system operating parameters
will be monitored throughout testing, as listed in Section 3.4 and detailed in Appendix A. PEMS
units will be removed from service if any out "out of range" operating conditions are identified,
and all "out of range" conditions will be corrected prior to placing the unit back into service. All
pertinent audit, verification, and calibration information will be recorded on data collection
sheets included in Appendix A.
4.5 Obtaining Background Levels for Gas Analysis Equipment
THC background levels used for emission rate calculations are measured continuously during all
test phases with a dedicated FID. Carbon Monoxide, CO2, and NOx background levels used for
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
50 of 83
emission rate calculations are measured during the engine-off soak period between phases 2 and
3 for multi phase cycles or after completion of the test for single phase cycles, using the same
instrumentation that measures diluted exhaust during the test phases.
Background levels are also monitored prior to each test to ensure reasonable ambient conditions
exist at the start of the test. Background THC, CO, NOx, and CO2 concentrations in the dilution
tunnel are recorded by the regulated emissions bench operator within 2 minutes prior to the start
of the day's first test. These are designated background reference concentrations. These reference
levels should be at or below typical ambient levels for the area. Backgrounds are measured
before each subsequent test and compared to the reference concentrations. If these measured
concentrations are greater than 15% above the reference concentrations, corrective action must
be taken. If the increase in background concentration is due to an increase in the ambient
background level (not influenced by station exhaust or spillage) and cannot be corrected, a new
set of background reference concentrations may be established and testing may resume.
4.6 Securing the Vehicle on the Dynamometer
The transportable test cell includes a Clayton model CTE 50-0 water brake chassis dynamometer
mounted on a Freuhauf trailer. The dynamometer is coupled to a Clayton direct drive variable
inertia flywheel system allowing vehicle testing at inertia weights of 1750, 2000, 2250, 2500,
2750, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, and 5500 pounds. Vehicle road load (Hp @ 50 MPH) is
manually set using the driver's pendant switch.
All utilities necessary for dynamometer operation (compressed air, cooling water, and electrical
power distribution) are self-contained on the trailer. A compressor provides compressed air for
operation of the dynamometer's roll brake, vehicle lift, and flywheel clutches. Compressed air is
also available at each corner of the trailer via quick-disconnect fittings for adjusting test vehicle
tire pressure. A closed-loop water system provides the dynamometer's power absorption unit
with both cooling and load water. The water system includes a SPA pump, a 12-gallon storage
tank, and a liquid to air heat exchanger. The water system is normally filled with a 50/50 mixture
of water and antifreeze to prevent freeze damage in colder weather. The air compressor and
water system are electrically wired into the test cell's electrical power distribution box. Electrical
outlets, also wired to the power distribution box, are located underneath the trailer for
miscellaneous equipment with eitherl 10 VAC and 220 VAC power requirements.
The vehicle is maneuvered onto the dynamometer with the drive wheels positioned and laterally
stabilized on the dynamometer rolls. The vehicle's hood is opened and an auxiliary cooling fan
is positioned in front of the vehicle. Testing does not begin until this system is positioned and
activated. The cooling system is positioned to direct air to the vehicle cooling system, but shall
not be directed at the catalytic converter. The vehicle must be restrained to assure that it cannot
leave the dynamometer rolls during acceleration and braking. The parking brake should be set
for front wheel drive vehicles prior to the start of the test. The parking brake need not be set for
vehicles that release the parking brake automatically when the transmission is put in gear. A
detailed SOP describing the securing a vehicle on the dynamometer is presented in Appendix A.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
51 of 83
Several equipment systems are required to fulfill the objectives of this project. The
dynamometer and its constant volume sampling (CVS) system are used to simulate roadway
conditions in a stationary setting. Undiluted vehicle exhaust gases are sampled by a SEMTECH
before the exhaust enters the CVS. Diluted exhaust is sampled from the CVS by several types of
measurement systems that continuously quantify particulate, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide,
oxides of nitrogen, hydrocarbons. Other systems remove a "batch" or an "integrated" sample
throughout a given vehicle's test for storage and later analysis (e.g., fuels and some toxic gases).
The sketch in Figure 4-3 gives an overview of the facility layout and the physical relationship
between the various instrument systems.
Figure 4-3. Overview of Facility and Equipment Layout
4.7 Particulate and Toxics Sampling Methods.
DRI will install and operated a suite of instruments to provide continuous PM analysis and to
collect batch samples of particle and gaseous exhaust components for later analysis. These
instruments collect sample air from the dynamometer dilution system via two isokinetic probes,
provided by BKI, inserted prior to a 90-degree bend in the dilution tunnel. Figure 4-4 illustrates
the sample train as it was installed for the pilot study. Heated conductive lines carried air from
the probes to the continuous instruments. Insulated copper tubing was used to carry sample air to
the time-integrated samplers.
4.7.1 Continuous PM Measurements
Continuous measurements include a Brooker Systems Model RPM-101 Quartz Crystal
Microbalance (QCM) and Thermo-MIE Inc. DataRam 4000 Nephelometer for PM mass and DRI
photoacoustic instrument for determination of black carbon mass concentrations. The continuous
monitors will all sample from a common sampling manifold. The photoacoustic instrument is
equipped with pressure, temperature, and relative humidity sensors so that the mass
concentration can be adjusted to the desired ambient condition of pressure and temperature. Data
from the real-time sensors can also be used to evaluate total particulate emissions by
accumulating it over the sample period, and can be compared with data from the filter samplers.
-------
Figure 4-4. Sample Train of DRI Equipment
Revision 4
8/1/2006
52 of 83
Procedures for operation of the photoacoustic instrument, QCM, and MPS, as well as daily
continuous instrument checklists, can be found in Appendix A.
4.7.2 Collection of Time Integrated PM and Toxics Samples
The vehicles will be tested on the EPA transportable dynamometer using a Unified Driving
Cycle that will be composed of three phases. Teflon and quartz samples are collected for each
phase and additional samples are integrated over the entire three phases of the UDC. These
samples include whole air samples in stainless steel canisters, DNPH cartridges and Teflon-
impregnated glass fiber (TIGF) filters with a backup cartridge consisting of XAD-4 resin.
The following substrates are proposed for this program:
• Gelman (Ann Arbor, MI) polymethylpentane ringed, 2.0 mm pore size, 47 mm
diameter PTFE Teflon-membrane Teflo filters (#RPJ047) for particle gravimetric
mass and elements.
• Pallflex (Putnam, CT) 47 mm diameter pre-fired quartz-fiber filters (#2500 QAT-
UP) for water soluble chloride, nitrate and sulfate and for organic and elemental
carbon measurements.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
53 of 83
• Pallflex (Putnam, CT) TX40HI20-WW 102 mm diameter teflon-impregnated
glass fiber filters for the DRI Sequential Fine Particulate/Semi -Volatile Organic
Compounds Sampler (PSVOC sampler).
• Polystyrene-divinylbenzene resins, XAD-4 in a cartridges for collection of semi-
volatile PAH. The Amberliete XAD-4 resin (20-60 mesh) is purchased from
Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.
Daily checklists pertaining to the time integrated sampler are included in Appendix A.
4.7.2.1 Teflon and Quartz Filters
Time-integrated samples for laboratory analysis are collected during each unified cycle test and a
60-minute tunnel blank each day as follows using specially adapted samplers designed and
constructed at DRI. Sample air is drawn from the CVS via %" insulated copper tubing to a small
heated stainless steel chamber. The sample air exits via a PM2.5 cyclone contained in the
chamber to a heated diffusing chamber approximately 1m tall, containing a thermistor
temperature probe. From this chamber, the sample air exits through the two filter cartridges.
Flow rates for each filter are set to 56 1pm by adjustable valves to give a combined flow of
approximately 113 1pm as required by the inlet cyclone. Single oil-less pump is used to draw air
through the sampler.
4.7.2.2 PUF/XAD/PUF Cartridge and Filter
A separate sampler for determination of parti culate and semi-volatile organic compounds
collects samples on 100 mm Teflon-impregnated glass fiber (TIGF) filters followed by glass
cartridges containing XAD adsorbent at a flow rate of 112 1pm. The material collected on these
media are removed by solvent extraction and analyzed at DRI by gas chromatography and mass
spectrometry. A single filter and adsorbent pair were collected for each unified cycle, combining
phases 1, 2 and 3. Sampling is suspended during the 10-minute soak period by turning off the
pump. Sample air is drawn from the dynamometer CVS via Va" insulated copper tubing to a
small heated stainless steel chamber. The sample air exited via a PM2.5 cyclone contained in the
chamber to a heated diffusing chamber, containing a thermistor temperature probe,
approximately 50cm tall. From this chamber, the sample air exits via the filter followed by the
XAD cartridge. Flow rates are approximately 113 1pm as required by the inlet cyclone, and are
monitored by an in-line TSI 4000 mass-flow meter. A single oil-less pump is used to draw air
through the sampler.
4.7.2.3 Carbonyl DNPH Cartridges
Sample air is drawn from heated cyclone chamber via a Vi" diameter Teflon hose and passed
through DNPH cartridges using a 6-channel sampler with integrated pump and mass flow
controller. Airflow is maintained at 500 cc/min. A single cartridge is exposed for the duration of
the 3 phases of the unified cycle and sampling is suspended during the 10-minute soak by
switching to an unused channel.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
54 of 83
4.7.2.4 Canister Sampling
For motor vehicle exhaust sampling, NO2 is of concern, since it may react with 1,3 butadiene.
Atkinson et al. (1984) described the series of reactions involving NO2 and dialkenes and the
consequence of the presence of NO. The reaction proceeds via initial NO2 addition to the double
bond, followed by rapid addition of O2 to the peroxy radical. In the absence of NO these peroxy
radicals react with NO2 to yield the thermally unstable peroxynitrates. Upon addition of NO,
however, the peroxy radical will react rapidly with NO leading to a rapid disappearance of the
peroxynitrates. The alkoxy radicals formed from the reaction of the peroxy radical with NO will
then decompose, react with O2, ultimately leading to the formation of HO2 radical. The reaction
of HO2 radical with NO generates HO radicals, which react with alkenes leading to rapid loss of
alkenes. Modeling of this chemical system by Stockwell (2004) shows the following results for a
canister samples containing 1,3-butadiene (43 ppbv), NO (10.0 ppm) andNO2 (1.0 ppm) in
various combination, assuming a canister pressure of 1.5 atmospheres and NO emission rate of
2.2 mg/mile. This emission rate was the highest among 57 LDGVs tested during the Gas/Diesel
PM Split Study (Fujita et al., 2001; Gabele, 2003). The decay rate of 1,3-butadiene in NO2 alone
was linear with a rate of about 9% loss per 24-hour period. With NO alone, the disappearance of
1,3-butadiene is about 50% in the first 22 hours and over 90% in 65 hours.
Under separate funding by the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy
Laboratory, DRI is currently evaluating the efficiency of a denuder for removing both nitric
oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from the sampling stream prior to collection in stainless
steel canisters. This evaluation will consist of the following three parts.
Determine the stability of a 1,3-butadiene standard in two sets of three synthetic canister samples
over a period of three weeks. Each set includes a canister containing 1,3-butadiene with purified
zero air and canisters with addition of NO and NO2, respectively. Aliquots are analyzed by gas
chromatography within the first hour, after 1 week and after three weeks. NO and NO2 levels
correspond to the highest NOx emitter in DOE's Gas/Diesel PM Split Study. This task was
completed in June, 2004 and decay rates match those predicted by Stockwell (2004).
Evaluate the removal efficiency of a denuder for removing NOx (NO and NO2). Saathoff et al.
(2003) recently reported the use a denuder containing cobalt oxide coated ceramic granulate to
remove NOx. Varying concentrations of NOx will be passed through the denuder and the
denuded sampling stream will be monitored with a chemiluminescence NOx analyzer. Three
levels of NOx will be used, which correspond to 2.0, 1.0 and 0.5 times the highest NOx emitter
in DOE's Gas/Diesel PM Split Study.
Exhaust from an in-use high-mileage automobile will be collected in two sets of two canisters,
one with an upstream NOx denuder and one without the denuder. Samples will be collected from
a sampling manifold to ensure a well-mixed exhaust sample and NOx concentrations in the
sampling manifold will be monitored with a chemiluminescence analyzer. The three sample sets
will be collected over a five-minute period from cold-start, and after a two-hour soak. Aliquots
will be analyzed by gas chromatography within the first hour, after 1 week and after three weeks.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
55 of 83
The colbalt oxide will replace the triethanoloamine (TEA) denuder that was originally proposed
to remove NO2. Sample air is drawn from heated cyclone chamber via a Vi" diameter Teflon
hose and passed through a Teflo filter and a denuder coated with the denuder to remove NOx
before being pumped into a Summa polished steel canister. Air flow was controlled by a needle
valve to obtain the necessary flow rate to fill the canisters to approximately 15"Hg positive
pressure over the duration of the complete unified cycle. Sampling is interrupted during the 10-
minute soak by switching to a bypass channel. The sampler draws a total flow of 2 1pm, but only
about 300 cc/min of that was pumped into the canisters.
4.8 Laboratory Analytical Methods
Analytical procedures that may be required for the accomplishment of the Statement of Work
tasks are listed in Table 4-3. All QC requirements designated in these methods will be met. For
required tasks not described in an EPA- or ASTM-approved method, SOPs will be required and
archived. These SOPs are stand- alone documents and are not included with this document.
Table 4-3. Summary of Laboratory Related SOPs
DRI SOP No.
2-102.4
2-106.3
2-108.3
2-109.4
2-110.4
2-111.4
2-114.1
2-201.1
2-202.1
2-203.4
2-204.4
2-205.2
2-703.1
2-704.1
2-710.1
2-750.1
Observable/Method
PM Gravimetry
Quartz Fiber Filter Prep
Sectioning of Filters
Ionic Species Filter Extraction
Filter Pack Processing
Filter Pack Shipping and
Receiving
PM2 5 FRM Mass
Filter Sectioning
Filter Extraction
1C Analysis
TOR Carbon Analysis
XRF Analysis
VOC by GC
VOC by GC/MS
Carbonyls by HPLC
Analysis of SVOC by GC/MS
Title
Gravimetric Analysis Procedures
Pre-firing of Quartz Fiber filters for Carbonaceous Material
Sampling
Sectioning of Teflon and Quartz Filter Samples
Extraction of Ionic Species from Filter Samples
Filter Pack Assembling, Disassembling, and Cleaning
Procedure
Sample Shipping, Receiving, and Chain-of-Custody
PM2.5 FRM Gravimetric Analysis
Filter Sectioning
Filter Extraction
Analysis of Filter Extracts and Precipitation Samples by
Ion Chromatography
Thermal/Optical Reflectance Carbon Analysis of Aerosol
Filter Samples
X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analysis of Aerosol Filter
Samples
Analysis of VOC in Ambient Air by Gas Chromatography
with Cyrogenic Concentration
Analysis of VOC in Ambient Air by Gas Chromatography
and Mass Spectrometry
Analysis of Carbonyl Compounds by High Pressure Liquid
Chromatography
Analysis of Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas
Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry
The following numbers of samples are to be collected in each of the two test rounds: 903 Teflon,
903 quartz, 349 TIGF/XAD, 337 canisters and 349 DNPH cartridges. Of the total samples
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
56 of 83
collected, the following numbers of analytical measurements are budgeted: 903 gravimetric
mass, 114 XRF (protocol A), 38 ICP/MS, 309 TOR carbon analysis (IMPROVE), 38 ion
chromatography, 17 GC/MS analysis of combined TIGF/XAD extracts, 18 GC/MS of TIGF
extract, 18 GC/MS of XAD extract, 32 canisters by GC-FID and 38 DNPH cartridges by HPLC-
UV. The following specific chemical analysis protocol applies to the Kansas City LDGV
emissions characterization study.
• Following gravimetric mass and XRF (protocol A) analysis of the three Teflon
filters for the separate phases of the UDC, the three filters will be extracted
together and the composite sample analyzed for elements by TCP-MS. We
recommend Mn, As, Hg and Pb for elemental analysis by ICP-MS based upon
results of the Gas/Diesel PM Split Study and the relative detection limits shown in
Table A7-lb for XRF and ICP-MS.
• Each quartz filter will be sectioned into two halves. One half of each quartz filter
for the three phases of the UDC will be used for thermal optical reflectance
carbon analysis (TOR) using the IMPROVE protocol. Remaining halves of the
three quartz filters will be extracted together and analyzed by ion chromatography
for chloride, sulfate and nitrate.
• TIGF/XAD samples will be analyzed for PAHs, methylated-PAHs, oxy-PAHs,
nitro-PAHs, hopanes, steranes, organic acids, cycloalkanes and alkanes by
GC/MS. The TIGF filters and XAD will be extracted and analyzed separately for
the 1991 to 1995 and 1996 and newer categories in order to improve the analytical
sensitivity of the method by reducing contributions of background contamination.
The filter and XAD will be extracted and analyzed together for the two older
model year categories.
4.8.1 Protocol for Selection of Samples for Chemical Analysis
Each of the two rounds of vehicle testing will be completed over approximately two months.
Because organic samples should be extracted within a month after sample collection,
compositing decisions will need to be made before the end of each round of testing. Timely
decisions are also required due to the limited number of canisters that will be available to the
project. Due to other programmatic needs, DRI can only supply about 120 stainless steel
canisters to the Kansas City Study. That number is about a third of the total number of canister
samples that are planned for each round. Consequently, about a third of the available canisters
must be recycled on a weekly basis. This section describes the rationale and operational
procedures for selecting samples for chemical analysis.
Most vehicles newer than ten years and with mileage accumulations less than 100K that were
tested in the Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study yielded mass loadings below the optimum target
loadings of 200 ug per sample for carbon analysis and 1 mg per sample for organic speciation.
Table 4-4 show the numbers of trucks and cars that will be recruited for the Kansas City Study in
each of the four model year groupings (pre-80, 80-90, 91-95 and 96 and newer) and the
approximate numbers of vehicles that are expected to be tested within each stratum. PM loadings
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
57 of 83
will be sufficient for chemical analysis for most vehicles in the two older model year categories
and compositing of samples is an option for these strata. In contrast, compositing is a necessity
for the two new model year categories in order to obtain adequate analytical sensitivity for
organic analysis.
Because the study design calls for testing the vehicles in random order, no media composites will
be collected (i.e., sampling multiple vehicles on the same media). Rather an appropriate number
of samples will be extracted and analyzed together where analytical methods allow compositing
prior to the chemical analysis (e.g., elements by TCP-MS, ions by 1C, organic speciation by
GC/MS, carbonyl compounds by HPLC-UV, and volatile organics by GC-FID). Table 4-4
shows the numbers of planned chemical analyses and approximate numbers of composite
samples by test vehicle category. The total number of composite samples and average number of
samples in each composite are shown, along with the corresponding percentages of vehicles in
the composites relative to the total number of vehicles tested in each stratum. These percentages
are larger for the two newer model year categories because no compositing is assumed for these
categories. These numbers are intended to reflect the overall objectives of the project. They are
tentative and subject to approval by the sponsor.
We anticipate that about 40 sample sets (including 6 dilution tunnel blanks) will be collected
during a week of sampling. If vehicles are tested randomly in portion to the sampling strata, the
numbers of vehicles tested in each stratum are listed in Table 4-5. The second number is the
average number of samples that would be required to for a composite.
Sufficient numbers of samples would be collected weekly to create composites in all categories
except for the 1996 and newer categories. A decision will be needed on a timely basis to either
analyze the sample set, hold them for subsequent compositing with other samples, or remove the
sample from further consideration by either archiving the sample or, in the case of canisters, to
discard the sample and recycle the clean evacuated canister back to the field. We propose to
make these decisions on a weekly basis beginning at the conclusion of the second week. The
decisions each week will be based on the previous two weeks of sampling. The target mass
loadings for each composite is a minimum of 1 mg of organic carbon, which will be estimated by
the differences of the continuous mass measurements (either QCM or DataRam or DustTrak)
minus the continuous black carbon measurements by PA. Composites will consist of samples
with similar OC to PM ratios. Some composite containing high black carbon to PM ratios (i.e.,
black smokers) will be analyzed as well. The weekly decision will be made by DRI and posted at
the end of the day each Monday.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
58 of 83
Table 4-4. Number of Planned Chemical Analyses and Approximate Number of Composite Samples by Test
Vehicle Category
Teflon filter
Round 1
Dally Tunnel Blanks
Test Vehicles
Truck -Pre 1980
Truck - 1980 to 1990
Truck- 1991 to 1995
Truck - 1 996 and newer
Car - Pre 1980
Car- 198010 1990
Car- 1991 io 1995
Car- 1996 and newer
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Weekly Calibration Vehicle
Field/Transport Blanks
Round 2
Daily Tunnel Blanks
Test Vehicles
Repeat Vehicle from Round 1
Truck- Pre 1980
Truck - 1980 to 1980
Truck - 1991 to 1995
Truck - 1996 and newer
Car- Pre 1980
Car- 198010 1990
Car - 1991 to 1995
Car - 1996 and newer
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Weekly Calibration Vehicle
Field/Transport Blanks
Total Round 1 and 2
No in
Stratum
50
100
70
40
40
50
80
50
50
100
70
40
40
50
80
50
No
Tested
60
250
26
52
36
21
21
26
42
26
15
12
12
60
230
25
27
53
37
21
21
27
43
27
10
12
12
No in
Comp
10
1
1
3
5
1
1
3
5
10
1
1
3
5
1
1
3
5
No. of
Comp
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
% Tested
15.4%
7.7%
16.5%
48.0%
24.0%
15.4%
21.6%
38.4%
15.1%
7.5%
16.1%
47.1%
23.5%
15.1%
21.2%
376%
mass
60
750
45
36
12
903
60
690
75
30
36
12
903
1806
elements
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
6
38
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
6
38
76
quartz
OC/EC
60
12
12
18
30
15
12
27
30
45
36
12
309
60
12
12
18
30
15
12
27
30
30
36
12
294
603
filter
Ions
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
6
38
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
6
38
76
TIGF/XAD TIGF
POC and
SVOC POC
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
3
17 18
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
3
17 18
34 36
XAD
SVOC
6
2
2
3
2
3
18
6
2
2
3
2
3
18
36
canister
voc
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
32
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
32
64
5NPH
cartridge
Carbon yls
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
6
38
6
4
4
2
2
5
4
3
2
6
38
76
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
59 of 83
Table 4-5. Composite Breakdown
Test Vehicles
Truck -Pre 1980
Truck- 1980 to 1990
Truck- 1991 to 1995
Truck - 1996 and newer
Car -Pre 1980
Car- 1980 to 1990
Car- 1991 to 1995
Car - 1996 and newer
Vehicles Tested Weekly
3
6
4
3
O
3
5
O
No. in Composite
1
1
3
5
1
1
3
5
4.8.2 Mass Gravimetric Analysis
Unexposed and exposed Teflon-membrane filters are equilibrated at a temperature of 20 ±5°C
and a relative humidity of 30±5% for a minimum of 24 hours prior to weighing. Weighing is
performed on a Sartorius SE2 electro microbalance with ±0.0001 mg sensitivity. The charge on
each filter is neutralized by exposure to a polonium source for 30 seconds prior to the filter being
placed on the balance pan. The balance is calibrated with a 20 mg Class M weight and the tare is
set prior to weighing each batch of filters. After every 10 filters are weighed, the calibration and
tare are re-checked. If the results of these performance tests deviate from specifications by more
than ±5 mg, the balance is re-calibrated. If the difference exceeds ±15 mg, the balance is
recalibrated and the previous 10 samples are re-weighed. At least 30% of the weights are
checked by an independent technician and samples are re-weighed if these check-weights do not
agree with the original weights within ±0.015 mg. Pre- and post-weights, check weights, and re-
weights (if required) are recorded on data sheets as well as being directly entered into a data base
via an RS232 connection. All PM2.5 and PM10 Teflon filters will be analyzed for mass. All
weights are entered by filter number into the DRI aerosol data base.
4.8.3 Elements by XRF
Table A7-lb compares the elements that are quantified by XRF and ICP-MS and the associated
minimum detection limits. Neither method will provide data for all specified elements. We
recommend a combination of XRF using DRI protocol A for three Teflon filters from each phase
of the UDC and ICP-MS for selected elements (e.g., Pb and Hg As, and Mn) Total cost per test
would be comparable to the budget estimate in our original proposal.
4.8.4 Elements by ICP-MS
Teflon-membrane filters will be analyzed with a Thermo Elemental X7 Inductively Coupled
Plasma Mass Spectrometer with Collision Cell and Xi interface for the following elements: Mn,
As, Hg and Pb. A quality control standard and a replicate from a previous batch are analyzed
with each set of 14 samples. When a quality control value differs from specifications by more
than ±5% or when a replicate concentration differs from the original value (when values exceed
10 times the detection limits) by more than ±10%, the samples are re-analyzed. If further tests of
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
60 of 83
standards show that the system calibration has changed by more than ±2%, the instrument is re-
calibrated as described above. All ICP-MS results are directly entered into the DRI databases.
4.8.5 Elemental and Organic Carbon
The thermal/optical reflectance (TOR) method measures organic (OC) and elemental (EC)
carbon. The TOR method is based on the principle that different types of carbon-containing
particles are converted to gases under different temperature and oxidation conditions. The
different carbon fractions from TOR are useful for comparison with other methods which are
specific to a single definition for organic and elemental carbon. These specific carbon fractions
also help distinguish among seven carbon fractions reported by TOR:
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere at temperatures between ambient and
120°C (OC1)
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere at temperatures between 120°C and
250°C (OC2)
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere at temperatures between 250°C and
450°C (OC3)
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere between 450°C and 550°C (OC4)
• The carbon evolved in an oxidizing atmosphere at 550°C (EC1)
• The carbon evolved in an oxidizing atmosphere between 550°C and 700°C (EC2)
• The carbon evolved in an oxidizing atmosphere between 700°C and 800°C (ECS)
The thermal/optical reflectance carbon analyzer consists of a thermal system and an optical
system. The thermal system consists of a quartz tube placed inside a coiled heater. Current
through the heater is controlled to attain and maintain pre-set temperatures for given time
periods. A portion of a quartz filter is placed in the heating zone and heated to different
temperatures under non-oxidizing and oxidizing atmospheres. The optical system consists of a
He-Ne laser, a fiber optic transmitter and receiver, and a photocell. The filter deposit faces a
quartz light tube so that the intensity of the reflected laser beam can be monitored throughout the
analysis.
As the temperature increases from ambient (~25°C) to 550°C, organic compounds are volatilized
from the filter in a non-oxidizing (He) atmosphere while elemental carbon is not oxidized. When
oxygen is added to the helium at temperatures greater than 550°C, the elemental carbon burns
and enters the sample stream. The evolved gases pass through an oxidizing bed of heated
manganese dioxide where they are oxidized to carbon dioxide, then across a heated nickel
catalyst which reduces the carbon dioxide to methane (CH4). The methane is then quantified
with a flame ionization detector (FID).
The reflected laser light is continuously monitored throughout the analysis cycle. The negative
change in reflectance is proportional to the degree of pyrolytic conversion from organic to
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
61 of 83
elemental carbon which takes place during organic carbon analysis. After oxygen is introduced,
the reflectance increases rapidly as the light-absorbing carbon is burned off the filter. The
carbon measured after the reflectance attains the value it had at the beginning of the analysis
cycle is classified as elemental carbon. This adjustment for pyrolysis in the analysis is
significant, as high as 25% of organic or elemental carbon, and it cannot be ignored.
The system is calibrated by analyzing samples of known amounts of methane, carbon dioxide,
and potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). The FID response is ratioed to a reference level of
methane injected at the end of each sample analysis. Performance tests of the instrument
calibration are conducted at the beginning and end of each day's operation. Intervening samples
are re-analyzed when calibration changes of more than ±10% are found.
Known amounts of American Chemical Society (ACS) certified reagent grade crystal sucrose
and KHP are committed to TOR as a verification of the organic carbon fractions. Fifteen
different standards are used for each calibration. Widely accepted primary standards for
elemental and/or organic carbon are still lacking. Results of the TOR analysis of each filter are
entered into the DRI database.
4.8.6 Ion Chromatographic Analysis for Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate
Water-soluble chloride, nitrate, and sulfate are obtained by extracting the quartz-fiber particle
filter in 15 ml of deionized-distilled water (DDW). The extraction vials are capped and
sonicated for 60 minutes, shaken for 60 minutes, then aged overnight to assure complete
extraction of the deposited material in the solvent. The ultrasonic bath water is monitored to
prevent temperature increases from the dissipation of ultrasonic energy in the water. After
extraction, these solutions are stored under refrigeration prior to analysis.
Water-soluble chloride (C1-), nitrate (NO3-), and sulfate (SO4=) are measured with the Dionex
2020i (Sunnyvale, CA) ion chromatograph (1C). In 1C, an ion-exchange column separates the
sample ions in time for individual quantification by a conductivity detector. Prior to detection,
the column effluent enters a suppressor column where the chemical composition of the
component is altered, resulting in a matrix of low conductivity. The ions are identified by their
elution/retention times and are quantified by the conductivity peak area. Approximately 2 ml of
the filter extract are injected into the ion chromatograph. The resulting peaks are integrated and
the peak integrals are converted to concentrations using calibration curves derived from solution
standards. The Dionex system for the analysis of C1-, NO3-, and SO4= contains a guard column
(AG4a column, Cat. No. #37042) and an anion separator column (AS4a column, Cat. No.
#37041) with a strong basic anion exchange resin, and an anion micro membrane suppressor
column (250 6 mm ID) with a strong acid ion exchange resin. The anion eluent consists of
sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) prepared in DDW. The DDW
is verified to have a conductivity of less than 1.8 10-5 ohm/cm prior to preparation of the eluent.
For quantitative determinations, the ion chromatograph is operated at a flow rate of 2.0 ml/min.
The primary standard solution containing NaCl, NaNO3, and (Na)2SO4 are prepared with
reagent grade salts which were dried in an oven at 105°C for one hour and then brought to room
temperature in a desiccator. These anhydrous salts are weighed to the nearest 0.10 mg on a
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
62 of 83
routinely calibrated analytical balance under controlled temperature (~20°C) and relative
humidity (±30%) conditions. These salts are diluted in precise volumes of DDW. Calibration
standards are prepared at least once within each month by diluting the primary standard solution
to concentrations covering the range of concentrations expected in the filter extracts and stored in
a refrigerator. The calibration concentrations prepared are at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/ml for
each of the analysis species.
Calibrations curves are performed weekly. Chemical compounds are identified by matching the
retention time of each peak in the unknown sample with the retention times of peaks in the
chromatograms of the standards. A DDW blank is analyzed after every 20 samples and a
calibration standard is analyzed after every 10 samples. These quality control checks verify the
baseline and calibration, respectively. Environmental Research Associates (ERA, Arvada, CO)
standards are used daily as an independent quality assurance (QA) check. These standards (ERA
Wastewater Nutrient and ERA Mineral WW) are traceable to NIST simulated rainwater
standards. If the values obtained for these standards do not coincide within a pre-specified
uncertainty level (typically three standard deviations of the baseline level or ±5%), the samples
between that standard and the previous calibration standards are re-analyzed.
After analysis, the printout for each sample in the batch is reviewed for the following: 1) proper
operational settings, 2) correct peak shapes and integration windows, 3) peak overlaps, 4) correct
background subtraction, and 5) quality control sample comparisons. When values for replicates
differ by more than ±10% or values for standards differ by more than ±5%, samples before and
after these quality control checks are designated for re-analysis in a subsequent batch. Individual
samples with unusual peak shapes, background subtractions, or deviations from standard
operating parameters are also designated for re-analysis.
4.8.7 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Because no media compositing will be possible, TIGF filters and XAD cartridges be extracted
and analyzed separately for the 1991 to 1995 and 1996 and newer categories. TIGF filter have
very low background and removing the artifacts from the XAD will improve the detection limits
for particulate organic species. Several samples will be composited together based on appropriate
sample composite criteria (e.g., emission rate and ratio of photoacoustic black carbon to QCM
mass).
Prior to extraction, the following deuterated internal standards are added to each filter-sorbent
pair: naphthalene-d8, acenaphthylene-d8, phenanthrene-dlO, anthracene-dlO, chrysene-d!2,
fluoranthene-dlO, pyrene-dlO, benz[a]anthracene-d!2, benzo[e]pyrene-d!2, benzo[a]pyrene-d!2,
benzo[k]fluoranthene-d-12 , coronene-d-12, and benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d!2, high molecular
weight aliphatic hydrocarbons ranging from dodecane-d26 to octacosane-d58, cholestane-d4; and
polar organics ranging from benzoic-d3 acid to cholesterol-d6. The filter-XAD pairs will be
extracted by Dionex ASE with dichloromethane followed by acetone to expand the polarity
range of analytes; these extraction solvents have been reported to yield high recovery of PAH
(Chuang et al., 1987) and other compounds of interest (Hawthorne et al., 1988, 1989).
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
63 of 83
The extracts are then combined and concentrated by rotary evaporation at 20°C under gentle
vacuum to ~1 mL and filtered through 0.45 mm Acrodiscs (Gelman Scientific), with the sample
flask rinsed twice with 1 mL CH2C12 each time. Approximately 100 uL of acetonitrile is added
to the sample and CH2C12 was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The final sample
volume is adjusted to 1 mL with acetonitrile. This procedure has been tested by Atkinson et al.
(1988). The detailed procedure is described in DRI standard operating procedures.
The extracts are then split into two fractions. The first fraction is analyzed without further
alteration for PAH, alkanes, hopanes, and steranes by a GC/MS using an electron impact select
ion storage (SIS) method. The second fraction is derivatized using a mixture of
bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA), trimethylsilylcholorosilane (TMCS), and
silylation grade pyridine to convert the polar compounds into their trimethylsilyl derivatives for
analysis of organic acids, cholesterol, sitosterol, and levoglucosan. Samples are then analyzed
by GC/MS using isobutane chemical ionization SIS method.
For hopanes and steranes, the samples are precleaned prior to GC/MS analysis using a solid
phase extraction (SPE) technique described by Wang et al. (1994a,b). Clean up is conducted on a
6ml Supelco SPE cartridge packed with 0.5g of SiOH. Samples are spiked on to a SPE cartridge
along with ten microliters of n_tetrocosane-d50 (internal standard) and the PAH internal standard
described above. Elution and fractionation is conducted with 1ml of hexane followed by 1.25 ml
of benzene/hexane (1:1). Hopanes and steranes are eluted along with n_tetrocosane-d50 in the
hexane fraction, while the PAH are eluted in the hexane/benzene with the PAH internal
standards.
The samples are analyzed either by the El (electron impact) or isobutane chemical ionization
(polar compounds) GC/MS technique. A Varian Star 3800CX GC equipped with an 8200CX
Automatic Sampler and interfaced to a Varian Saturn 2000 Ion Trap was used for these analyses.
Injections (1 uL) were made in the splitless mode onto a 30 m 5% phenylmethylsilicone fused-
silica capillary column (DB-5ms, J&W Scientific). Quantification of the individual compounds
is obtained by selective ion storage (SIS) technique, monitoring the molecular ion (or the
characteristic ion) of each compound of interest and the corresponding deuterated internal
standard, added prior to extraction. Calibration curves for the GC/MS quantification are made
for the most abundant and characteristic ion peaks of the hopanes, steranes, PAH and other
organic compounds of interest using the deuterated species most closely matched in volatility
and retention characteristics as internal standards. Authentic PAH standards (purchased from
Aldrich, Inc.) plus National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference
Material (SRM) 1647 (certified PAH) with the addition of deuterated internal standards and of
those compounds not present in the SRM (i.e., methoxylated phenols, hopanes, steranes,
lactones, cholesterol) are used to make calibration solutions. For quantifying hopanes and
steranes the following authentic standards are used: C27 20R-5a,14a,17a-cholestane (purchased
from Aldrich), 17b(H),21b (H)-hopane, 17a(H),21b(H)-30-norhopane, and 17a(H),21b(H)-
hopane (purchased from Chiron AS, Norway). The remaining hopane and steranes are identified
based on their mass spectra and retention time comparison with data available in the literature
(Wang and Fingas, 1995; Rogge et al., 1993). For quantification of the hopanes and steranes for
which authentic standards are not available, the response factor of standards most closely
matched in volatility and retention characteristics are used. A three-level calibration is
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
64 of 83
performed for each compound of interest and the calibration check (using median calibration
standards) is run every ten samples to check for accuracy of analyses. If the relative accuracy of
measurement (defined as a percentage difference from the standard value) is less than 30%, the
instrument is recalibrated.
Recently, the Organic Analytical Laboratory (OAL) has received Varian 1200 triple quadrupole
gas chromatograph - mass spectrometer (GC/MS/MS) system. The tandem MS/MS system
allows for structural elucidation of unknown compounds with precursor, product and neutral loss
scan. The GC interface allows for sensitive analyses of complex mixtures in electron impact (El)
as well as positive and negative chemical ionization (CI) mode. Negative CI offers a superior
sensitivity for the analysis of nitro-PAH (mutagens and/or suspected carcinogens) that could be
emitted from combustion sources, including motor vehicle engines. The sensitivity of this
instrument in full scan EI/MS mode is approximately 1 pg/ul with 20:1 signal-to-noise ratio
(S/N). In EI/MS SIM mode it reaches 50 fg/ul with 10:1 S/N. For negative CI, 10 fg/ul of
octafluoronaphthalene gives S/N of 20:1. This superior sensitivity offers the advantage of
analyzing small samples collected during a short sampling time.
4.8.8 Gaseous Air Toxics
Gaseous air toxic include canister sampling for VOC (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, —& p-,o-
xylene, ie. BTEX, styrene, n-hexane, naphthalene, 1,3-butadiene, MTBE), and DNPH-coated
Sep Pak cartridges sampling for carbonyl compounds (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein).
The DRI Organic Analytical Laboratory (OAL) routinely uses these methods and DRI standard
operating procedures (SOPs) for sampling and analysis are available upon request.
Canister Samples
Canister samples are analyzed for speciated VOC concentrations promptly upon receipt of
samples from the field, using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method according to
guidance provided by the EPA Method TO-15. The GC/MS system includes: Entech 7100
preconcentrator, Varian 3800 gas chromatograph with FID and column switching valve, and
Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass spectrometer. The Entech preconcentrator consisted of three
traps: 50% glass beads/50% Tenax, held at -100°C during sample transfer, 100% Tenax held at -
40°C and a final focusing trap (a piece of silico-steel capillary) held at -180°C. The sample is
desorbed from the first trap at 10°C, from the second trap at 200°C and from the third one at
approximately 70°C to a transfer line heated to 110°C and connected to the head of the first
column. The sample is injected at the head of a 60 m x 0.32 mm polymethylsiloxane column
(CPSil-5, Varian, Inc.) held at 30°C. This column is connected to the switching valve leading
into a 30 m x 0.53 mm GS-GasPro column (J&W Scientific). After approximately 7 min the
valve was switched so that the effluent from the first column eluted onto a second 15 m x 0.32
mm polymethylsiloxane column connected to the mass spectrometer. The column switch was
timed so that the C2 and C3 compounds eluted on the FID and all C4 and higher compounds
eluted on the mass spectrometer. The GC program is as follows: 30°C held for 2 min, then
8°C/min up to 260°C. Calibration of the system is conducted with a mixture that contained the
most commonly found hydrocarbons (75 compounds from ethane to n-undecane, purchased
from Air Environmental), MTBE, and halocarbons (23 compounds from F12 to the
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
65 of 83
dichlorobenzenes, purchased from Scott Specialty Gases). The standards are prepared in 6 L
Silco-Steel canisters (Restek, Bellefonte, PA) by mixing three different standards through a
multi-valve manifold using a Baratron absolute capacitance manometer (MKS Instruments,
Andover, MA) to determine the pressure each standard added to the mixture. Prior to mixing,
approximately 0.2 ml of ultrapure water is added to the canister to humidify the mixture (for
mixture stability). The concentrations in the mixture are in the range of 0.2 to 10 ppbv. Three
point external calibrations are run prior to analysis, and one calibration check is run every 24
hours. If the response of individual compounds is more then 10% off, the system is recalibrated.
For canisters the replicate analysis is conducted at least 24 hours after the initial analysis to allow
re-equilibration of the compounds within the canister. The replicate analyses are flagged in our
database and the programs we have for data processing extract these replicates and determine a
replicate precision. Replicate analysis is important because it provides us with a continuous
check on all aspects of each analysis, and indicates problems with the analysis before they
become significant.
Carbonyl Compounds
Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein will be collected with Sep-Pak cartridges that have
been impregnated with an acidified 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) reagent (Waters, Inc),
according to the EPA Method TO-11 A. When the exhaust is drawn through the cartridge,
carbonyls in the sample are captured by reacting with DNPH to form hydrazones, which are
separated and quantified using HPLC in the laboratory (Fung and Grosjean, 1981). After
sampling, the cartridges will be eluted with acetonitrile. An aliquot of the eluent will be
transferred into a 1-ml septum vial and injected with an autosampler into a high performance
liquid chromatograph (Waters Alliance System) for separation and quantitation of the
hydrazones (Fung and Grosjean 1981). Since acroleine undergoes isomerization when reacted
with DNPH on the silica-gel cartridges forming two products, both peaks will be identified and
quantified and the total concentration will be reported.
4.9 Quality Control
Testing Site
Internal QC checks for sampling and sample analysis activities must be determined prior to
project start-up. These QC checks may include duplicate samples, matrix spikes, surrogates, and
blanks for each type of sample and sample matrix.
PEMS Overview
For each integrated sample, the run number, start and stop time, elapsed time, initial and final
flow rate, and any exceptional occurrences are recorded on log sheets which are kept with the
media at all times. Bar coded stickers with unique media IDs are attached to all media and their
corresponding log sheets for tracking. Immediately after the conclusion of each test cycle the
media are repacked with the log sheets and stored in a refrigerator, except for the canisters,
which are packed and shipped via 2-day express to DRI each day. All media are packed into
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
66 of 83
coolers with ice packs and shipped overnight back to DRI where they were logged in and placed
in cold storage until analysis.
Continuous data are backed up via the wireless network and processed at the end of each
sampling day to determine phase-averaged values. Run number, date, time, and vehicle license
plate number were attached to all files to identify the data.
• For those instruments whose measurement depends on accurate flow rate
determinations, such as the TEOM and QCM, the indicated flow rate must be
checked against the flow rate measured with a Gillibrator bubble flow rate meter.
• The continuous instruments must be checked for leaks in a manner that is
appropriate for each instrument. The sample system will be under substantial
negative pressure with respect to the ambient pressure.
• Inlet integrity and sample line losses need to be evaluated at the outset by the
combination of models from the aerosol spread sheets, and from direct
measurement. A line transfer measurement needs to be performed that determines
the mass concentration upstream of an instrument inlet, as well as the downstream
concentration. These measurements can be performed, for example, with two
Dustrak nephelometers. The two Dustraks must first be compared in a side-by-
side test with a common inlet to make sure they are responding at the same clip.
• The instruments must be checked for any zero offsets. Filtered air can be
introduced to the inlet of the instrument in question, and a measurement of the
indicated quantity needs to be performed to quantify, and correct, any zero
offsets. This measurement can also be performed when vehicle exhaust enters the
sampling chamber, in which case any unexpected sensitivity to exhaust gas can be
discovered and quantified.
• Daily plots will be made of the data from the continuous instruments as time
series to provide immediate feedback in a raw form for the integrity of the
sampling system, and of each instrument. Time-averaged data for each phase of
the test will be obtained daily, and compared against filter-sampled data if
available.
• Continuous measurements can provide an assessment of the likely loadings that
are occurring on filter media. The flow rate used to deliver sample to the filter
media can be adjusted accordingly.
The DRI photoacoustic instrument has a built in piezo electric transducer for use in occasionally
evaluating the microphone calibration. Results from this measurement must be looked to ensure
that the instrument is working properly.
As described earlier in this plan, all PEMS units used in this study will a full a complete warm-
up, zero and audit sequence to verify CO, CO2, NOx, and THC measurement accuracy.
Calibrations will be performed as necessary to bring the PEMS into proper calibration. The
concentrations and accuracy of all gasses used for auditing and calibrating will be recorded, and
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
67 of 83
data files will be generated during all audits to preserve records of system accuracy and
calibrations.
All PEMS system flows and pressures will be verified and recorded, and ambient conditions as
measured by the PEMS will be recorded and verified with independent measurements. A sample
system leak check will be performed to verify sample system integrity, and a FID fuel leak check
will also be performed. System temperatures (FID oven and chiller) will also be verified and
recorded, and all sample rates and transport delay settings will be verified.
PEMS units will be removed from service if any out "out of range" operating conditions are
identified. All pertinent audit, verification, and calibration information will be recorded on data
collection sheets, as shown in Appendix A. Also included in Appendix A are detailed usage
guidelines to provide the PEMS technician item-specific instructions along with appropriate
SEMTECH user manual references.
Laboratory
Prior to the start of the field work, all samplers will be checked for leaks and the in-line flow
meters will be cross calibrated using reference flow measurement devices. Leak testing will be
performed by capping the inlet lines leading to each sampler and turning on the pumps. If the
flow meter readings decrease to less than 10% of the nominal sampling flow rate in a reasonably
short time the system will be passed. If not, the source of the leak will be identified and fixed,
then the test repeated. With the exception of the Teflon/Quartz filter sampler all units need to
achieve near-zero flow rates during the leak test. Due to the friable nature of the pre-fired quartz
filters it is not possible to obtain a perfect seal in the filter holders without damaging the media,
but the <10% criteria can still be met for each filter individually and for the system as a whole. In
addition to the vacuum test, the sum of flows through each of the two filter cartridges will be
compared to the total flow entering the inlet and need to agree within 5%.
All flowmeters will be calibrated using either a Gillibrator electronic bubble meter or a rotameter
that has been cross-calibrated with a Roots meter at DRI. Calibration flows will be measured at
the inlet point of each sampler (or outlet for the canister sampler) with appropriate sampling
media installed. The resulting calibrations will be used to determine the desired nominal flow
rates, and will be marked on a label on each flowmeter so that the operator can observe any
deviations during testing. Variations in nominal flow rate due to sampler problems will be
recorded in a logbook.
4.10 Sample Handling and Custody
Testing Site
All samples will follow the chain-of-custody requirements and standard Good Laboratory
Practices required for labeling, recording, and tracking all samples from collection through
database archival. It will be the responsibility of the laboratory personnel to maintain internal
logbooks and records that provide a custody record throughout sample collection.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
68 of 83
Identifying labels are attached to each fuel and oil sample container. Label information will
include the unique vehicle identifier, date/time of collection, and sampler initials. To protect the
label from water and solvent damage, each label will be waterproof. The sample labels
permanently identify each sample collected and link each sample to the vehicle from which it
was collected.
In addition to the vehicle identification number, each sample container will be numbered
consecutively and a sample sheet identifying each sample will be included in the shipping box, if
appropriate. These sample sheets are retained by the laboratories as physical evidence of sample
receipt and must therefore be signed by the sampler. The sample sheet will contain a summary
of the field logbook entries for all the samples collected and will be maintained on electronic
format (spreadsheets).
Onsite sampling staff will record sampling events in a formal field logbook. Logbooks will be
maintained and archived as a permanent record of all sample collection activities performed.
Laboratory
A sample is considered in custody when received by the laboratory receiving department from an
official package courier. At this time, it is logged into the general receiving logbook a
representative of the laboratory signs for the package. The samples are bar-coded into the
respective Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), in lieu of updating the chain-of-
custody form (if supplied), and the samples are stored properly. Damaged shipping containers,
evidence of damage and/or tampering, etc., are brought to the attention of the Laboratory
Director and QA Manager. If necessary, a review is initiated to determine whether the damage
compromised the integrity and/or quality of the sample. All condensed phase samples and
sample extracts are stored in freezers. The rooms are locked when not in use and the building
has limited access (i.e., locked from 1730 to 0730 weekdays and 24 hours weekends to ensure
access by authorized personnel only).
When a sample is analyzed, its unique identification number is recorded in a written logbook for
each instrument (e.g., run list) and/or the LIMS. These unique identification numbers allow the
sample to be tracked through LEVIS and/or written records during sample preparation, analysis,
and data validation. Condensed phase samples and sample extracts are archived for at least one
year following the completion of the project.
Several types of laboratory records are routinely maintained. Written records include receiving
logbooks, shipping logbooks, chain-of-custody forms, project folders, instrument logbooks,
instrument service logbooks, calibration records which include a calibration standard logbook, a
canister cleaning logbook, and sampler maintenance and cleaning logbooks. Computerized
records include LIMS, method files, calibration files, raw data files, processed data files, and
combined data files.
Written records are maintained in the appropriate location in the laboratory. Written records are
always maintained in non-erasable ink so that alterations are easily noted. Project folders
include sample lists and other information regarding the sample and project. Instrument
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
69 of 83
logbooks record each sample analyzed and pertinent information regarding the analysis. All
calibrations are also recorded. Other calibration records include the calibration logbook that
includes information about the standard solutions made in the laboratory. Service logbooks and
files show services and/or modifications done to the instruments. The canister cleaning LIMS
record includes the unique can and ID number and the project the canister is assigned, date of
last cleaning, and QA certification lot number and information. Logbooks are kept on file in the
laboratory for a minimum of 5 years.
Computerized records are maintained on a central computer (the LIMS file server). The data
collection system includes a history record that maintains lists of files created or modified, and
the name of the person creating or modifying the file. An original report is printed after analysis
and documents the method and calibration file used including the last modification date of the
file. Backups of computerized records, including but not limited to removable media (floppy
disks) and tapes, are stored in the LIMS manager's office for off-site storage.
4.11 Inspection/Acceptance of Supplies and Consumables
Staff are authorized to acquire property and supplies from vendors, and are authorized to make
appropriate transactions. Accountable property that is acquired and charged to the Work
Assignment will be authorized on an individual line item basis and will be authorized by the
Project Manager or Acting Project Manager.
Receiving Process
Upon arrival, property will be examined to determine quantity received, condition, and to
identify transit related discrepancies. When shortages or damages are identified at time of
delivery, the carrier's signature will be obtained. Shipped items will be checked from a copy of
the original invoice and the packing slips to document quantities received and condition, and will
be moved to a protected area for distribution. Full accountability is established once the invoice
has been compared to the purchase order, prices have been adjusted for all items ordered and
shipped, and the invoice has been sent to the accounting department for payment. Gas cylinders
and all returnable or reusable containers will be accounted for and immediately returned to their
appropriate vendors.
Discrepancies in Shipments
If an overage, shortage, or damage upon receipt is discovered, necessary actions will be taken
directly with the vendor or supplier.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
70 of 83
SECTION 5: DATA MANAGEMENT AND VALIDATION
5.1 Data Acquisition Requirements (Non-Direct Measurements).
Testing Site
Exhaust emissions measurements must be accurately acquired, mathematically manipulated, and
logged onto computer storage devices for archival. Quality assurance of each step ensures that
transfer errors are eliminated and that data in the database truly represent the data collected
during the experimental run.
A primary function of this work area is to provide for the generation of emissions reports with
accompanying statistics according to the procedures specified in the Federal Register for
determining emission rates of pollutants from mobile sources and in accordance with Federal
Testing and Work Assignment requirements and guidelines. The task of this specialized section
is multi-functional to accomplish assignment objectives. We will assist as requested in the design
and specification of computer systems necessary to acquire, archive, process, and report the vast
quantities of physical and analytical data generated during each vehicle test, project, and the
overall mobile source program. The proposed staff will be responsible for the installation,
operation, preventive maintenance, troubleshooting, and repair of the computer systems and
peripherals utilized in this area as requested. Support will be provided in the area of software
development, enhancement, and evaluation of software packages. The staff has the responsibility
of software maintenance and updating.
Laboratory
The goal of data processing is to provide accurately combined data into a single database for
each analysis. Depending on the analysis, the data includes calculations for replicate precision,
mean blank values, blank variability, blank-corrected concentrations, and standard errors for
each reported value based on combined volume, replicates and blank uncertainties. The standard
error is calculated based on the combined volume for carbonyl and semi-volatile compound;
replicates for hydrocarbon, SVOC, and carbonyls; and blank uncertainties for carbonyl and
SVOC, the minimum detection limits is substituted for hydrocarbon data. The uncertainty
analysis allows us to present our data with absolute uncertainties associated with each number in
the report.
The primary function of laboratory data management is to store data in a consistent fashion that
is both secure and available. To serve this need, file server systems have been established that
provide a central storage area for all laboratory and field data. The databases have defined
structures that are maintained in one area where all field names are consistent and permit easy
merging and comparison of the various databases. Locating all data on a central file server
prevents problems associated with having multiple copies of the same data set, and allows the
individuals charged with data processing, security, validation, and QA access to the same
databases.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
71 of 83
5.2 Reporting
Analytical personnel will be responsible for reducing analytical data according to the method
used and providing both raw and summary data with a case narrative and along with the
completed sample calculations. Records of all weighings, calibrations, system performance
checks, blanks, surrogate recoveries, and any other method-required QC data will be provided,
along with the raw sample data and notes of problems and corrective action taken. Notes from
logbooks made by onsite sampling personnel will be reduced and compiled.
Reports of analysis will be generated for all samples analyzed in support of the Statement of
Work. These reports, along with the applicable chain-of-custody documentation (if required),
will be provided as required in accordance with the schedule within the Work Plan. These reports
of analysis will be provided in both a written and a computerized format. The computerized
reports will be on CD-ROMs in either Microsoft Excel 5.0, Lotus for Windows, or ASCII
format, as directed by ERG and the EPA Work Assignment Manager.
5.3 BKI Data Review, Verification, and Validation
Data will be examined for compliance with all QC requirements for the method used for
analysis. Notations will be made concerning any deviations from these criteria. Outliers will be
tested according to ASTM E-178-80 or other applicable standard, and appropriate notations will
be made in the summary report concerning the rejection of any data as outliers.
5.4 DRI Verification and Validation Methods
Data validation will be performed by DRI personnel according to SOPs. This validation will
begin with examination of the raw data, summary data, and field and laboratory validation codes.
We will ensure that all the required data are included, sample calculations are complete, and that
the summary data accurately represent the raw data. The validation data will be assembled with
the reduced laboratory notation sand data validation notations, and a report will be prepared.
Mueller (1980), Mueller et al., (1983), and Watson et al. (1983, 1989, 1995) define a three-level
data validation process for an environmental measurement study. Data records are designated as
having passed these levels by entries in the column of each data file. These levels, and the
validation codes that designate them, are defined as follows:
Level 0 (ZERO): These data are obtained directly from the data loggers that acquire the data in
the field. Averaging times represent the minimum intervals recorded by the data logger, which
do not necessarily correspond to the averaging periods specified for the database files. Level 0
data have not been edited for instrument downtime, nor have procedural adjustments for baseline
and span changes been applied. Level 0 data are not contained in the database; although they are
consulted on a regular basis to ascertain instrument functionality and to identify potential
episodes prior to receipt of Level 1A data.
Level 1A (1 A): These data have passed several validation tests applied by the measurement
investigator prior to data submission. The general features of Level 1A are: 1) no removal of data
values and use of flagging data when monitoring instruments did not function within procedural
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
72 of 83
tolerances; 2) flagging measurements when significant deviations from measurement
assumptions have occurred; 3) verifying computer file entries against data sheets; 4) replacement
of data from a backup data acquisition system in the event of failure of the primary system; 5)
adjustment of measurement values for quantifiable baseline and span or interference biases; and
6) identification, investigation, and flagging of data that are beyond reasonable bounds or that are
unrepresentative of the variable being measured.
Level 2 (2): Level 2 data validation takes place after data from various measurement methods
have been assembled in the master database. Level 2 validation is the first step in data analysis.
Level 2A tests involve the testing of measurement assumptions (e.g. internal nephelometer
temperatures do not significantly exceed ambient temperatures), comparisons of collocated
measurements, and internal consistency tests (e.g. the sum of measured aerosol species does not
exceed measured mass concentrations). Level 2 tests also involve the testing of measurement
assumptions, comparisons of collocated measurements, and internal consistency tests.
Level 3 (3): Level 3 is applied during the model reconciliation process, when the results from
different modeling and data analysis approaches are compared with each other and with
measurements. The first assumption upon finding a measurement, which is inconsistent with
physical expectations, is that the unusual value is due to a measurement error. If, upon tracing
the path of the measurement, nothing unusual is found, the value can be assumed to be a valid
result of an environmental cause. The Level 3 designation is applied only to those variables that
have undergone this reexamination after the completion of data analysis and modeling. Level 3
validations continue for as long as the database is maintained.
A higher validation level assigned to a data record indicates that those data have gone through,
and passed a greater level of scrutiny than data at a lower level. All data supplied to the Kansas
City LDGV emission characterization study database will have undergone data validation
through Level 1A.
5.5 Verification and Validation for the PEMS
All PEMS testing and audit data will be collected and transferred to a main repository on a daily
basis. Each file name, as well as fields within each data file, will be used to indicate the
associated BKI dynamometer run number (if applicable), vehicle license plate digits, and type of
file (audit, preconditioning run, dyne test, or drive-away). Independent tracking logs will also be
maintained for all PEMS test files.
After the PEMS files are transferred to the main repository, they will be processed and reviewed.
PEMS audit records will be reviewed to ensure all testing is performed within allowable
accuracy limits. PEMS emission measurements taken during dynamometer testing will be
calculated and compared with those measured by the dynamometer sampling system (both
overall and phase-specific emissions). In addition, application of appropriate correction factors
and transport delays will be verified for each sampling system.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
73 of 83
5.6 QC Calculations
Measurement precision will be assessed by calculating the relative standard deviation of the
results of replicate measurements. The equation used is:
where s is the standard deviation, x; is an individual measurement, x (bar) is the mean of the
measurements, and n is the number of measurements compared.
Acceptance criteria will be based on the relative standard deviation:
=
x
where RSD is the relative standard deviation, s is the standard deviation, and x (bar) is the mean.
Accuracy will be assessed by measuring the agreement between the accepted value for a QC
material versus the determined value:
where R is recovery, Cm is the measured concentration of the QC material, and Ca is the accepted
value for the QC material.
Completeness of data will be calculated in the following way:
%C = 100%*-
n
where C is completeness, v is the number of valid measurements, and n is the number of
measurements necessary to achieve a specified statistical level of confidence.
For QA purposes, substantial comparisons among measurements will be made to determine their
predictability, comparability, and equivalence. Although the different observables measured are
quite diverse, it is possible that they may be highly correlated owing to their quantification of
related particle properties or to large fluctuations caused by emissions and meteorology.
Relationships between variables will depend on the composition of the aerosol as well as
meteorological conditions. Measures of predictability, comparability, and equivalence are
applied to data sets stratified by aerosol composition and season. Predictability requires a
consistent and reliable relationship between measurements, even if they are of different
quantities. Comparability can be established between monitors that ostensibly measure the same
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
74 of 83
observable, but with different principles. PM2.5 mass acquired from the DataRam nephelometer,
QCM and gravimetric mass are expected to be comparable.
5.7 MSOD Data Management
In accordance with the requirements set forth in the original Scope of Work, data procured over
the course of the project will be processed and delivered in the EPA's MSOD format. Field data
collection procedures have been designed with MSOD data collection requirements in mind.
After collecting the vehicle testing information, datasets to be imported into the EPA MSOD will
be prepared. Data integrity and accuracy are of the utmost importance, and in order to ensure that
the data prepared for the MSOD accurately represents the data that was originally received, the
following four step approach for electronic data handling and manipulation has been developed,
described below:
• Import raw data into SAS dataset(s);
• Clean up and Convert data to match MSOD format and export to text files;
• Import text files into the MSOD load files; and
• Verify the validity of the output database and files.
This approach separates raw import and data cleanup issues from project-specific issues of data
format conversion and validation. In the first three stages, emphasis is placed on automation.
Scripts and programs will be used as much as possible, to provide repeatable steps for the
verification stage and documentation. In the first import stage, the raw input data will be loaded
into SAS datasets. The data will be imported into datasets that mimic, to the extent possible, the
design of the original files. In this way, each raw input file will map to one or more specific SAS
datasets, with close agreement in table content and layout. While some data cleanup may be
needed for a successful data import, no data manipulation (such as unit conversions or factor
manipulation) will be performed at this stage. Minor data cleanup may be required because of
conflicts between file types, such as end-of-record or end-of-data discrepancies, differences in
character sets, conflicting numeric formats, or data types that do not convert directly. Once the
data is imported, the raw import data will be considered "read only" and no updates will be made
unless the import process is modified and repeated. After the data is loaded into the raw datasets,
it will be reviewed for data integrity and completeness.
Once the data review and clean up is complete, the raw import datasets will remapped and all
required conversions and data manipulation will be performed in SAS, moving and converting
data from raw and intermediate datasets into final text files. These text files will then be
imported directly into MSOD load tables (in DBF format) supplied by EPA. The final step in the
process will involve running EPA's EPAVAL program against each of the DBF import tables.
This program will quality assure each of the tables and log all errors encountered. Each of the
errors will then be reviewed and addressed accordingly. Once the import tables for each dataset
are complete they will be delivered to EPA for further verification and loading into the MSOD.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
75 of 83
SECTIONS: ASSESSMENT AND OVERSIGHT
6.1 Assessment and Response Actions
Corrective action will be initiated as a result of internal QC checks that reveal instruments or
systems operating outside the range required for acceptable data, or in the event of any system
failure. For example, corrective action will be performed for the following conditions: analytical
system shown "out of control" according to method acceptance criteria, analytical precision
outside DQOs, and analytical accuracy outside acceptability range as defined by DQOs.
The system used for corrective action is the "closed loop" system, including the following
elements.
• Problem definition;
• Assignment of responsibility for investigation of the problem;
• Problem investigation;
• Determination of appropriate corrective action;
• Implementation of corrective action;
• Verification of problem correction; and
• Implementation/dissemination of procedural changes, if any.
To enhance the timeliness of corrective action and minimize the generation of unacceptable data,
problems identified by internal QC checks will be resolved at the lowest possible management
level. Staff will correct the out-of-control conditions (indicated by their QC data) by using the
corrective action information contained in the SOPs referenced in this QAAP and then will
report the problem and corrective action taken to the Project Manager.
Problems involving any change in scheduling, the sample work plan, or performance of
analytical tasks will be handled in a manner agreed upon by the Project Manager and the EPA
WAM.
Performance audits typically include the submission of blind samples such as NIST Standard
Reference Materials in an appropriate matrix to the analytical laboratory, and comparison of their
results with the certified values. Systems audits typically include examination of sampling and
packaging procedures, as well as examination of records from calibration and maintenance of
both field and analytical equipment and evaluating the training of field and laboratory personnel.
Monthly internal audits/checks for sampling and sample analysis activities will be performed
according to guidelines established by 48 CFR PART 46 - QUALITY ASSURANCE FAC 97-
14, November 23, 1999 and the EPA Interim final EPA QA/R-5 November 1999, Interim
guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Management Plans, or as otherwise directed
by the EPA Project Officer though ERG. These QC checks will include duplicate samples,
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
76 of 83
matrix spikes, surrogates, and blanks for each type of sample and sample matrix independent of
the quarterly audits for the regulated emissions bench.
The Project Manager will perform monthly spot checks of such project activities, evaluation of
response to EPA and ERG communications, completion of QC data by laboratory personnel, and
recording and archiving of data. In addition, a monthly summary will be prepared and submitted
as part of the Monthly Progress Report to document the overall QA program activities and
findings for project activities.
The most frequently used audit by onsite staff is the Technical System Audit (TSA), which is a
qualitative on-site evaluation of an entire measurement system. These audits will be performed
by a QA representative that is independent of the data collection activity. The TSA examines the
entire operation: all equipment, facilities, personnel, record keeping, data validation, calibration
procedures, reporting requirements, and QC procedures. TSAs will be scheduled and performed
during the beginning of data collection activities and annually thereafter, or can be initiated any
time by the Project Manager or QA Manager, or by the E PA Project Officer or QA Manager.
TSAs can also be initiated when a new employee is hired in order to ensure that the staff is
following the proper procedures described in SOPs. Most TSAs are based on project progress
reports or the results of performance evaluation (PE) studies. Frequently, problems revealed in a
PE audit will trigger a TSA to determine the cause. The two main purposes of a TSA are to
determine that project personnel and equipment are functioning properly and that all procedures
are being implemented as prescribed in the Quality Management Plan and other project planning
documents. This objective evidence is gathered by interviewing personnel, examining records,
and observing project activities. Checklists are used to guide the TSA. The checklists are
prepared based on performance criteria, such as Data Quality Objectives (DQOs), that are listed
in the project's Quality Management Plan and other planning documents.
Data Quality Audits (DQAs) will be used to evaluate documentation associated with data quality
indicators to verify that the data are of known quality. Its primary purpose is to verify the
existence of quantitative and qualitative indicators of data quality. The following activities will
be evaluated against the QA project plan and any other relevant documentation on a quarterly
basis and reported in the quarterly QA report.
• Recording, and transferring raw data;
• Calculations, including equations used;
• Documentation of data-handling methods; and
• Selection and discussion of data quality indicators.
QA representatives will implement the DQA which entails tracing data through their processing
steps and duplicating intermediate calculations in the beginning of each project and quarterly
thereafter. A representative set of the data will be used from raw data and instrument readouts
through data manipulation and through data reduction to summary data, data calculations, and
final reported data. The focus is on identifying a clear, logical connection between the steps.
Particular attention is paid to the use of QC data in evaluating and reporting the data set. DQAs
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
77 of 83
will be conducted throughout the project, or afterwards as required. They may be prescheduled
or performed at the request of our Project Manager, QA Manager or by ERG and EPA staff if
problems are discovered.
6.2 Reports to Management
To provide essential feedback to management on the progress of the QA Program, a quarterly
report will be prepared for the Program Director by the Project Manager. In addition, a summary
of QC activities will be made in the monthly progress report prepared for the EPA. Both of these
reports will address the following.
• Status of any major QA activities;
• Corrective actions taken during the period;
• Summaries of measures of precision and accuracy for the materials prepared
during the period;
• Performance and system audit results; and
• Significant changes in facilities, personnel, major analytical or support equipment,
procedures, data processing, or reporting.
In addition to these quarterly outputs, QA-specific deliverable outputs will be provided for all of
the compositional parameters according to the schedule given in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1. Schedule for QC Deliverable Outputs.
Output
THC Analysis
CO Analysis
NOx Analysis
CO2 Analysis
CVS Verification
HC Blind Audit Results
CO Blind Audit Results
NOx Blind Audit Results
CO2 Blind Audit Results
QC Notebook (PC/AT)
Time Period
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
78 of 83
REFERENCES
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 86, Standards for emission from methanol-fueled
motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines; Final Rule, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C. April 11, 1989.
EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans, EPA QA/R-5, EPA/240/B-01/003, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., March 2001.
EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans, EPA QA/G-5, EPA/240/R-02/009, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., December 2002.
Constant Volume Sampling System Water Condensation, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency; Frank Black, Clean Air Vehicle Technology Center; Richard Snow, Research Triangle
Park, N.C., February 1994.
Research Protocol Method for Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Detailed Hydrocarbons Emitted
from Automobiles, Clean Air Vehicle Technology Center; William Crews and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; Dr. James N. Braddock, Research Triangle Park, N.C.,
Revision No. 5, March 1995.
Standard Test Method for Determination of Formaldehyde and Other Carbonyl Compounds in
Air (Active Sampler Methodology), S.B. Tejada, Analytical Chemistry, Vol 26:167-185, 1986.
Standard Operating Procedure for Transportable Dynamometer, Clean Air Vehicle Technology
Center; Francis Black, William Crews, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Peter
Gabele, Research Triangle Park, N.C., November, 2002.
Arnott, W. P., H. Moosmiiller, et al. (1999). "Photoacoustic spectrometer for measuring light
absorption by aerosols: Instrument description." Atmospheric Environment 33: 2845-2852.
Arnott, W. P., H. Moosmiiller, et al. (2000). "Nitrogen dioxide and kerosene-flame soot
calibration of photoacoustic instruments for measurement of light absorption by aerosols."
Review of Scientific Instruments 71(7): 4545-4552.
Gabele, Peter (2003). Support of The Gasoline/Diesel Particulate Matter Split Study. Prepared by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (DOE IAG # DE-AI04-2001AL67138, Research
Triangle Park, NC for the U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office, March 17,
2003.
Hawthorne, S.B., DJ. Miller, R.M. Barkley and M.S. Krieger (1988). "Identification of
methoxylated phenols as candidate tracers for atmospheric wood smoke pollution." Environ. Sci.
Technol. 22, 1191-1196.
-------
Revision 4
8/1/2006
79 of 83
Hawthorne, S.B., M.S. Krieger, DJ. Miller and M.B. Mathiason (1989). "Collection and
quantitation of methoxylated phenol tracers for atmospheric pollution from residential wood
stoves." Environ. Sci. Technol., 23, 470-475.
Rogge, W.F. (1993). Molecular Tracers for Sources of Atmospheric Carbon Particles:
Measurements and Model Predictions. Ph.D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA.
Stockwell, William (2004). Personnel Communications.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999a). Compendium Method TO 14A:
Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient Air Using Specially
Prepared Canisters With Subsequent Analysis by Gas Chromatography. Compendium of
Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, Second Edition,
EPA/625/R-96/010b, January 1999.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999b). Compendium Method TO-11A:
Determination of Formaldehyde in Ambient Air Using Adsorbent Cartridge Followed by High
Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) [Active Sampling Methodology]. Compendium of
Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air, Second Edition,
EPA/625/R-96/010b, January 1999.
Wang, Z., M. Fingas, and K. Li (1994b). Fractionation of a Light Crude Oil and Identification
and Quantification of Aliphatic, Aromatic, and Biomarker Compounds by GC-FID and GC-MS,
Part II. J. of Chromato. Sci., 32, 367-382.
Watson, J., E. Fujita, J.C. Chow, B. Zielinska, L. Richards, W. Neff, and D. Dietrich (1998).
Northern Front Range Air Quality Study. Final report prepared for Colorado State University,
Fort Collins, CO, June 30, 1998.
Zielinska, B. and J.C. Sagebiel (2001) Collection of In-Use Mobile Source Emissions Samples
for Toxicity Testing, Project # RCI-8-18148-01, Final Report prepared for DoD/NREL, February
2001
-------
Appendix A
Study Modifications made between Rounds 1 and 2
A-l
-------
A1. Changes from Round 1
Round 2 test procedures, equipment, and testing conditions differed somewhat from those
during Round 1. The most notable differences are discussed in an Appendix to the updated
QAPP, and are presented below:
Onsite PEMS repair support
Onsite PEMS repair support was available throughout the Round 2, and greatly reduced
equipment downtime and shortages. Most PEMS problems were minor issues such as stuck
solenoids, loose or dirty contacts and fittings, water in the system, or blown relays, and were able
to be repaired quickly. Most larger repairs, such as system module and CPU board replacements,
could also be accomplished onsite (after receipt of necessary repair materials).
Temperatures and ambient conditions
Round 2 testing was conducted during the winter, as opposed to the Round 1 summer
study. Since this portion of the study was to be conducted at ambient temperatures, an enclosed
and heated structure was erected in which to conduct PEMS installation activities. This
prevented operation of the units sub-freezing temperatures (beyond their specified operating
temperature range). Operation of the PEMS units below freezing temperatures was occasionally
necessary, and resulted in various operational problems, such water freezing in the FID exhaust
drain lines and internal filters, and freezing in the flowmeter pressure-differential measurement
tubes and exhaust sample lines. The signal transducer boxes used with the new pressure-
differential flowmeters occasionally would not warm up to operating temperature (as indicated
by the "warm-up" indicator LED), and some emissions measurement drift was seen during some
conditioning runs (as evidenced by pre-test and post-test audits). This drift may be due to
auditing the PEMS in the heated installation bay and then performing the conditioning test in a
vehicle's trunk or bed at ambient temperatures.
Flowmeter changes
Hot-wire anemometer-style flowmeters were used throughout the Round 1 summer
portion of the study. These were replaced with pressure-differential style flowmeters for Round
2 of the study. These new flowmeters transmitted pressure signals through flexible tubes to a
signal transducer box which converted the pressure-differential signal and exhaust temperature
measurement into an exhaust mass flow rate determination.
Flowmeter mounting changes
License plate brackets and suction cup clamp assemblies were primarily used to install
the flowmeters used during Round 1 of the study. This posed concerns associated participants or
pedestrians burning themselves (particularly on driveaway testing) or the assemblies falling off.
Occasionally, flowmeters were hung underneath the rear of the vehicle, which was generally
laborious and exposed the flowmeter to water and possible dragging damage. The new pressure-
differential flowmeters were significantly larger and heavier, so common bicycle racks were
used for flowmeter installations during Round 2. Wire meshes were secured to these racks to
allow mounting of license plates and to protect against burns.
A-2
-------
Software changes
Several PEMS software changes were implemented prior to or during Round 2. This new
software allowed use of the new pressure-differential flowmeters, and it also allowed activation
of auto-zero and automatic FID heater shut-down after a period of time (auto-zeros were
performed only on drive-away testing). Another software update involved adding a "session
manager" which "bundled" all the audits and second by second test information into one file.
The following software changes were implemented throughout the study (including both Rounds
1 and 2):
• Rollout beginning July 12, 2004: Software Version 9.03
• Rollout beginning August 17, 2004: Software Version 9.03 SP1
• Rollout beginning November 23, 2004: Software Version 9.04
• Rollout beginning December 6, 2004: Software Version 9.05 SP1
• Rollout beginning December 16, 2004: Software Version 9.05 SP2
Testing was continued with Software Version 9.05 SP2 through the end of Round 2.
A.2 Procedural changes between Rounds 1 and 2
The equipment downtime experienced during Round 1 was greatly reduced during Round
2 through the addition of an on-site PEMS repair and support person. Most repairs were minor,
such as stuck solenoids, loose or dirty contacts and fittings, water in the system, or blown relays,
and were able to be repaired quickly. Most larger repairs, such as system module and CPU
board replacements, were also accomplished onsite (after necessary repair items were received
onsite). This increase in equipment up-time allowed significantly more driveaways to be
conducted in Round 2 than were possible during Round 1 of the study.
As mentioned in Section 2.4.1, the hot-wire anemometer-style flowmeters used
throughout the Round 1 summer portion of the study were replaced with pressure-differential
style flowmeters for Round 2 of the study. Measurements from the original hot-wire
anemometer flowmeters were adversely affected by heat radiation effects at low vehicle speeds
and idle. Since convective cooling minimized these effects when vehicles were in motion, low-
speed and idle flow measurements were biased low. This bias was eliminated with the use of
pressure-differential style flowmeters provided for Round 2 of the study. These flowmeters
relied on a bank of differential pressure sensors (as opposed to a hot-wire anemometer) in order
to determine corrected mass exhaust flowrates. However, the orifices in the differential pressure
sensors used in these new flowmeters were susceptible to particulate matter clogging and
moisture freezing. This condition was minimized as much as possible by thoroughly purging all
orifices with high-pressure dry compressed nitrogen prior to each use, and by maintaining the
flowmeters and tubing assemblies in above-freezing conditions.
A-3
-------
Earlier in the study, problems were encountered with preventing moisture and exhaust
fumes from entering vehicles during testing. The new flowmeters required additional tubing to
be routed out of the trunk (generally requiring the trunk to be propped open wider). Standard
household pipe insulation purchased at a hardware store was found to fairly effectively seal
trunks. Carbon monoxide detectors were used to ensure vehicle exhaust was not entering the
passenger compartment.
As mentioned in Section 2.4.1, Round 2 testing was conducted during the winter, as
opposed to the Round 1 summer study. Operation of the PEMS units below freezing
temperatures was occasionally necessary, and proved to be problematic because of water
freezing in system components and measurement drift. Battery life seemed greatly reduced
during Round 2 testing, perhaps due to battery cycle fatigue (these were the original batteries
used since the start of the study) and also possibly due to operation in the cold temperatures.
In order to prevent trunks from inadvertently popping open, as would occasionally
happen with the original vice-grip-devised trunk latches, heavy-duty zip-ties were used (with
metal rings installed in the trunk latch assembly) to secure trunks. These zip ties, which are
typically used for securing building ventilation and may be found at a typical hardware store,
also prevented motorists from tampering with the PEMS units installed in trunks during
driveaway tests.
Experience gained during Round 1 of the study helped streamline Round 2 testing. For example,
installation procedures and sequences were modified in order to minimize lost time in the event
of equipment malfunctions. Certain "tricks" and procedures for equipment software helped
expedite installations and minimize system resets. The incorporation of a session manager into
the host software also allowed consolidation of audit and test information into one test file,
thereby expediting equipment setup and reducing time needed for test processing and analysis.
A-4
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix BB
Pilot Report
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
Kansas City PM
Characterization Study
Draft Pilot Testing Report
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
June 21,2004
-------
ERGNo. 0133.18.001.001
KANSAS CITY PM CHARACTERIZATION STUDY
DRAFT PILOT TESTING REPORT
EPA Contract #GS 10F-0036K
Prepared for:
Kitty Walsh
Project Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2000 Traverwood Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Prepared by:
Sandeep Kishan
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78731
June 21,2004
T:\Kansas City Exhaust Emissions\Pilot Report\EPA-040618.doc
-------
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1-1
1.1 Goals of the Pilot Testing 1-1
2.0 Site Preparation 2-1
2.1 Site Selection for Protective Covering for the Equipment and Vehicles 2-1
2.2 Transportation of Dynamometer and Analytical Trailer 2-3
2.3 Transportation of Correlation Vehicles 2-3
2.4 Set-up of Dynamometer, Analytical Trailer, and Associated Sampling
Equipment 2-4
2.4.1 Setup of Associated Sampling Equipment 2-4
2.4.2 Equipment Provided 2-7
2.5 Maintenance and Calibration of Dynamometer, Analytical Trailer, and
Associated Sampling Equipment 2-8
2.5.1 Calibration and QC Testing of Associated Sampling Equipment 2-15
2.6 QC Tests and Preparation of the Dilution Tunnel 2-16
2.7 SEMTECH Setup 2-21
2.7.1 General Pilot Study Issues 2-21
2.7.2 SEMTECH Sampling during Preconditioning Runs 2-22
2.7.3 SEMTECH Sampling during Dynamometer Testing 2-23
2.7.4 SEMTECH Testing during Customer Drive-Aways 2-24
3.0 Testing of EPA Correlation Vehicles (Testing Schedule): 3-1
4.0 Pilot Study Emission Results 4-1
4.1 Ann Arbor Emissions Testing 4-1
4.2 Regulated Emission Results 4-7
4.3 Continuous and Time-Integrated Gravimetric Mass Measurements 4-10
4.4 SEMTECH Pre-Conditioning Runs 4-26
4.5 Emission Events as a Function of Vehicle Driving 4-29
4.6 Composite LA92 Results from Dynamometer and SEMTECH 4-32
5.0 Issues to be Resolved 5-1
List of Figures
Figure 2-1. Sampling Train for the Pilot Study 5
Figure 2-2. Diluted Exhaust Temperatures 18
Figure 2-3. Diluted Exhaust Temperature Distribution 18
Figure 2-4. THC Levels in Dilution Tunnel 20
Figure 3-1. Contour Plot Showing the Speed/Acceleration Distribution of the LA92 2
Figure 3-2. LA92 Speed Trace 3
Figure 4-1. Mass Concentration as Determined by Gravimetric Analysis of Teflon Filters for All
Tests by Cycle Phase 12
Figure 4-2. PM2.5 Gravimetric Filter Mass for All Tests 13
Figure 4-3. Continuous PM Mass Measurements, Dodge Stratus 14
Figure 4-4. Continuous PMMass Measurements, Ford Taurus 15
Figure 4-5. Continuous PMMass Measurements, Chrysler New Yorker 16
-------
Figure 4-6. Comparison of Averaged Continuous Mass and Black Carbon to Corresponding
Filter Mass Concentrations for Each 17
Figure 4-7. Cumulative QCM Response for the Dodge Stratus 19
Figure 4-8. Cumulative QCM Response for the Ford Taurus 20
Figure 4-9. Kansas City QCM Summary 23
Figure 4-10. Ann Arbor QCM Summary 24
Figure 4-11. Cumulative QCM Response for the Chrysler New Yorker 25
Figure 4-12. Speed Trace for Preconditioning Run for the Dodge Stratus 27
Figure 4-13. Speed-Acceleration Distribution for the Preconditioning Run for the Dodge Stratus
28
Figure 4-14. Dynamometer Speed/Acceleration Profile for Run #84022 30
Figure 4-15. Dynamometer NOx Emission Generation Contour Plot for Run #84022 31
Figure 4-16. Plots of Dynamometer Measurements vs. SEMTECH Measurements 36
List of Tables
Table 2-1: Sampling Support Equipment Rented or Purchased by ERG, On-Site 8
Table 2-2. Static Load (Dead Weight) Checks 9
Table 2-3. Dynamometer Roll Speed Checks 9
Table 2-4. Daily Coastdowns (Vehicle off Rolls) @ 3500 Ibs and 6.0 Hp Indicated 10
Table 2-5. Initial Correlation Vehicle Coastdowns 10
Table 2-6. Additional 2004 Stratus Coastdowns 11
Table 2-7. Additional 1988 Taurus Coastdowns 12
Table 2-8. Additional 1988 New Yorker Coastdowns 13
Table 2-9. CVS Propane Injections 14
Table 2-10. Gas Analyzer Linear Regression Analysis 15
Table 2-11. Analysis of PEMS Audit and Span Gases 15
Table 2-12. Dynamometer SEMTECH Test Issues During Pilot 23
Table 3-1. Speed-Acceleration for the LA92 Cycle 4
Table 3-2. Schedule and Description of Pilot Study Emissions Tests 5
Table 3-3. Description of Correlation Tests 6
Table 4-1. Summary of Ann Arbor Results 5
Table 4-2 Regulated Emission Results 7
Table 4-3. Percent Standard Deviation (%SD) for the Regulated Emissions 9
Table 4-4. Gravimetric Mass and Averaged Continuous Data for All Tests, by Phase 11
Table 4-5. Summary of QCM Results 21
Table 4-6. Comparison of SEMTECH and Dynamometer Emission Measurements 34
Table 4-7. By-Vehicle Comparison SEMTECH vs. Dynamometer Composite Results 37
11
-------
1.0 Introduction
The USEPA have established a contract with Eastern Research Group, Inc. to conduct a
program in Kansas City to evaluate exhaust emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles. The
proposed program consists of measuring particulate matter (PM) and other components in
exhaust emissions from 480 randomly selected light-duty gasoline vehicles in the Kansas City
metropolitan area.
The study is being conducted in Kansas City in three parts:
Part 1: Pilot Study (May 2004)
Part 2: Phase I Testing (July-September 2004)
Part 3: Phase II Testing (January-March 2005)
This report summarizes the results of the Pilot Study conducted in Ann Arbor, MI and
Kansas City, KS in April through May 2004.
1.1 Goals of the Pilot Testing
The primary goals of the Pilot Study were to:
1) Set up a testing facility in Kansas City that will be used for the entire study;
2) Finalize all testing methodologies, testing procedures, and data handling
procedures; and
3) Test three vehicles in Ann Arbor and Kansas City to establish the relationship
between the emission results from the two facilities.
1-1
-------
2.0 Site Preparation
2.1 Site Selection for Protective Covering for the Equipment and Vehicles
Five potential test sites for the Kansas City vehicle emissions study were visited on
Friday, March 26, 2004. Several additional sites were visited in April. Visits to all of the sites
were arranged through Brian Staton of CBRE (Industrial site realtor) and John Dietel of ERG,
both of whom visited the sites with ERG's technical staff. The listing realtors were also with
ERG at their respective properties. ERG subsequently ranked the sites from most desired to least
desired according to criteria important to the emissions study. The major ranking criteria are as
follows:
1) Can be used to soak and test vehicles at outside, ambient temperatures.
2) Adequate ventilation to maintain suitable background levels and to insure safety
of personnel.
3) Adequate size for test equipment, vehicle storage and movement.
4) Heated/Air Conditioned office space.
5) Other: Easy access to major driving arteries (interstate highways), Adequate
power, restrooms, minimum sound amplification, adequate outdoor parking.
Another important factor was whether or not the property had an overhead water
sprinkler system. The typical warehouses were all equipped water sprinkler systems and could
not be used below -34 F. Only two of the properties offered did not have water sprinkler
systems, so these two properties became our primary choices, and are described below.
#1. 6636 Berger Avenue, Kansas City, KS
This property had about 7,000 sq ft total floor space, with about 1,000 sq ft office and 2
restrooms. With four 12' x 12' bay doors plus two wall vent fans, this site provided adequate
ventilation and easy access. This was also one of two properties visited which did not have an
overhead water sprinkler system, which meant it can be used at sub-freezing temperatures.
Indoor space was adequate - about 5,000 sq ft of main floor space for test area and vehicle
soaking, with another 900 sq ft of area for working on and inspecting vehicles. The site also
included three offices plus a common area. The front entrance and parking was ideal to greet
vehicle owners. This was a stand-alone property, so we would not have to interact with other
tenants. The site had ample outdoors parking and storage, and the building was ready to occupy
after minor clean up.
2-1
-------
This was the site ultimately chosen.
#2. 9601 Alden, Lenexa, KS.
This property had about 7,900 sq ft total floor space, with about 1,000 sq ft office and 2
restrooms. With seven 12' x 12' bay doors plus two ceiling vent fans, this facility was built with
ventilation of exhaust fumes in mind. This was one of two properties visited, and did not have an
overhead water sprinkler system, which meant it could be used at sub-freezing temperatures.
Indoor space was adequate, with about 6,000 sq ft main floor space for test area and vehicle
soaking, and another 900 sq ft of area for working on and inspecting vehicles. The site featured
eight offices plus a common area. One office had window overlooking test area and has potential
for housing auxiliary sampling equipment (PM samplers, etc). The front entrance and parking
was ideal to greet vehicle owners. This was also a stand-alone property, so we would not have to
interact with other tenants. The site had ample outdoors parking and storage, and was located in
an industrial park with easy access to Interstates 35 and 435. The building was ready to occupy
after minor clean up. The only negative feature of this property was that a sub-lease arrangement
could not be worked out satisfactorily in the required time.
#3. 9870-9878 Pflumm Rd, Lenexa, KS.
This property was a huge warehouse, of which we would occupy half. A dividing wall,
offices, and restrooms would have to be constructed. One drive in bay door and four dock high
bay doors were located on one side of this space, with the other three sides enclosed, so
ventilation was in question. A couple of roof vents could have been added to help with
ventilation. The facility could not be operated below 35 F due to water sprinkler system. In
addition, ERG would need to obtain permit to operate motor vehicles inside this space. This is
the largest space we visited and had ample room. One office is presently in place. Additional
offices, restrooms, and dividing firewall would have to be constructed. The site featured easy
access to interstates.
#4. 6926 Martindale Road, Shawnee, KS
This site was a 6,000 sq ft warehouse, with unfinished construction. They were preparing
(grading) the parking lot for paving when we were there. The site featured two drive in bay doors
along one wall. Again, ventilation was a problem. The offices (once constructed) would split the
test area into two halves. The site had a water sprinkler system, so building must be maintained
above 35 F.
2-2
-------
#5. 1530-64 E. Spruce St, Olatahe, KS
This was a warehouse space with adequate office space and a nice entrance facade for
greeting vehicle owners. However, one drive in bay door and two dock high bay doors on one
corner of space did not lend itself to adequate ventilation. Noise amplification was high in this
space. The overhead water sprinkler system meant temperatures must be kept above 35 F.
#6. 6230-6244 Merriam Dr., Johnson Co.
This site was totally unacceptable, with one 8' high drive in bay door. ERG would not be
able to get the testing equipment into the facility. Multiple dock high bay doors opposite wall
could have provided ventilation, although minimal power was available. Three 3,000 sq ft spaces
were separated by walls. This was a dirty warehouse space located in a very crowded, small
parking area.
2.2 Transportation of Dynamometer and Analytical Trailer.
Final preparations for shipping the transportable dynamometer and analytical trailer were
made the week of May 3, 2004. All necessary equipment was loaded onto either the open
dynamometer trailer or the enclosed analytical trailer. Equipment was protected from the
elements as appropriate and securely strapped.
Equipment was transported by Wilson Transport, SVC, and left the RTF-EPA facility on
Monday, May 10, 2004, aboard two separate drop deck trucks. Delivery in Kansas City was
scheduled for Wednesday, May 12.
The equipment arrived in Kansas City without incidence. BKI staff members also arrived
in Kansas City on May 12 to off-load the equipment and begin set-up. The drop deck trucks
arrived at the test site around 4:00 p.m. A wrecker was called and arrived shortly thereafter to
off-load both the dynamometer and analytical trailer. The equipment was inspected and found to
be in great shape, with no apparent mishaps in transit. Provisions were made to store the
equipment in the secure, fenced yard at the test site, as the building itself had not yet been
vacated by the previous tenant.
2.3 Transportation of Correlation Vehicles.
The three correlation vehicles were transported from Ann Arbor to the Kansas City site
by M & R Transport. The vehicles were picked up in Ann Arbor on May 14 and arrived at the
Kansas City test site on Monday, May 17. The vehicles appeared to have suffered no damage
2-3
-------
during transit. At the conclusion of the pilot study, two of the vehicles were shipped back to Ann
Arbor via the same carrier. (The third vehicle is to remain at the KC test site for use during the
summer and winter test phases). These two vehicles were picked up on May 28 and arrived in
Ann Arbor on June 1.
2.4 Set-up of Dynamometer, Analytical Trailer, and Associated Sampling
Equipment.
Set up of the dynamometer and associated equipment began on the afternoon of Saturday,
May 15, immediately after the previous tenet completed moving out. The first order of business
was to wash the bay floors, which were covered in mud and other debris. The dynamometer and
analytical trailer were then towed into the building and positioned at the rear of the building, near
electrical power sources and ventilation. The dynamometer trailer was set in place, leveled, and
catwalks and ramping were installed. The following day, electrical power was connected, the
dilution tunnel was assembled and set in place, and plumbing and electrical interfaces between
the analytical trailer and dynamometer were established. Working gases for the analytical trailer
were received and installed.
2.4.1 Setup of Associated Sampling Equipment
DRI installed and operated a suite of instruments to provide continuous PM analysis and
to collect batch samples of particle and gaseous exhaust components for later analysis. These
instruments collected sample air from the dynamometer dilution system via two isokinetic
probes, provided by BKI, inserted prior to a 90-degree bend in the dilution tunnel. Figure 2-1
illustrates the sample train as it was installed for the pilot study. Heated conductive lines carried
air from the probes to the continuous instruments. Insulated copper tubing was used to carry
sample air to the time-integrated samplers. The following instruments were operated
continuously during all tests.
Photoacoustic: Designed and built at DRI, this instrument continuously measures the
concentration of light-absorbing carbonaceous material (black carbon) in the airstream by the
photoacoustic principle, in which the absorption of modulated light by particles results in
thermal-acoustic pulses that can be detected by a highly-sensitive transducer and phase-locked
amplifier.
2-4
-------
PM2.5
CYCLONE
N02
denuder
^-QUARTZ
^-Dyno
CVS
VALVES
-TIGF FILTER
XAD
CARTRIDGE
VOC (canister)
sampler
PM2.5 IMPACTORS
PHOTOACOUSTIC
(black carbon)
DusTrak
(light scattering)
Figure 2-1. Sampling Train for the Pilot Study
QCM: Quartz crystal microbalance, manufactured by SEMTECH, monitors the
accumulation of particles on a surface in real-time. A clean-air dilution system is used in
conjunction with this instrument to reduce the dynamic range of the source aerosol
concentration.
DustTrak: A commercially available portable monitor for particulate matter, the TSI
DustTrak estimates the concentration of particulate mass by measuring the intensity of light
scattered perpendicular to a laser beam directed through the airflow stream. Flow rate is 1.5 1pm.
2-5
-------
DataRAM: Another commercially available portable monitor for participate matter,
which operates on the same principle but uses two wavelengths for more uniform response to
varying particle sizes. Flow rate is 2 1pm.
Time-integrated samples for laboratory analysis were collected during each unified cycle
test and a 60-minute tunnel blank each day as described below, using specially adapted samplers
designed and constructed at DRI:
Filter samples: During each phase of the unified cycle tests a pair of filter cartridges
collected particles to be analyzed for gravimetric mass and organic and elemental carbon
concentrations. Pre-weighed 47mm Gelman Teflo filters were used for gravimetry. Pre-fired
47mm quartz fiber filters were collected for analysis of organic and elemental carbon by Thermal
Optical Reflectance (TOR). Back-up quartz filters were also included behind the Teflo and will
also be analyzed by TOR to investigate the effect of sampling temperature on volatilization of
organic particles. For this sampler, air was drawn from the CVS via Va" insulated copper tubing
to a small heated stainless steel chamber. The sample air exited via a PM2.5 cyclone contained in
the chamber to a heated diffusing chamber approximately 1m tall, containing a thermistor
temperature probe. From this chamber, the sample air exited through the two filter cartridges.
Flow rates for each filter were set to 56 1pm by adjustable valves to give a combined flow of
approximately 113 1pm as required by the inlet cyclone. A single oil-less pump was used to draw
air through the sampler.
Since the automated sequential sampler designed for this project was not completed in
time for the Pilot Study, it was necessary to manually change filters between phases of each test.
This was done as quickly as possible during the -25 second idle period during the transition from
phase 1 to phase 2. The operators were able to observe the vehicle on the dynamometer during
this process and begin the process as soon as the vehicles wheels stopped turning to assure
synchronization with the driving cycle.
Samples were collected by a separate sampler for determination of paniculate and semi-
volatile organic compounds on 100 mm Teflon-impregnated glass fiber (TIGF) filters followed
by glass cartridges containing XAD adsorbent at a flow rate of 112 1pm. The material collected
on these media will be removed by solvent extraction and analyzed at DRI by gas
chromatography and mass spectrometry. A single filter and adsorbent pair were collected for
each unified cycle, combining phases 1, 2 and 3. Sampling was suspended during the 10-minute
soak period by turning off the pump. Sample air was drawn from the dynamometer CVS via Va"
insulated copper tubing to a small heated stainless steel chamber. The sample air exited via a
2-6
-------
PM2.5 cyclone contained in the chamber to a heated diffusing chamber, containing a thermistor
temperature probe, approximately 50cm tall. From this chamber, the sample air exited via the
filter followed by the XAD cartridge. Flow rates were approximately 113 1pm as required by the
inlet cyclone, and was monitored by an in-line TSI 4000 mass-flow meter. A single oil-less
pump was used to draw air through the sampler.
Aldehydes: Sample air was drawn from the heated cyclone chamber via a Vi" diameter
Teflon hose and passed through 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) cartridges using a 6-
channel sampler with integrated pump and mass flow controller. Airflow was maintained at 500
cc/min. A single cartridge was exposed for the duration of the 3 phases of the unified cycle.
Sampling was suspended during the 10-minute soak by switching to an unused channel.
VOC: Sample air was drawn from the heated cyclone chamber via a Vi" diameter Teflon
hose and passed through a Teflo filter and a denuder coated with triethanolamine to remove NC>2
before being pumped into a Summa polished steel canister. Air flow was controlled by a needle
valve to obtain the necessary flow rate to fill the canisters to approximately 15"Hg positive
pressure over the duration of the complete unified cycle. Sampling was interrupted during the
10-minute soak by switching to a bypass channel. The sampler draws a total flow of 2 1pm, but
only about 300 cc/min of that was pumped into the canisters.
[Heated tubing is shown as triple lines, insulated tubing as double lines.]
2.4.2 Equipment Provided
Table 2-1 lists equipment was either rented or purchased to support the sampling efforts.
2-7
-------
Table 2-1: Sampling Support Equipment Rented or Purchased by ERG, On-Site.
Name
Oil-less Air
Compressor
AC Electricity
Generator
CVS Dilution
Air Dryer
Refrigerator
Freezer
Purpose
To supply clean, dry
dilution air to the micro-
dilution system used with
the QCM.
To supply power for the
CVS dilution air heater.
To reduce CVS dilution
air humidity.
To store particulate filter
media.
To store fuel samples.
Notes
Purchased. Provides up to 5 SCFM at 100 psig.
Has a 25 gal. tank. Water trap and filtration
provided by EPA.
Rented from United Rentals. Wacker model G-
50. 50-kilowatt capacity. Diesel fueled. Power
umbilical provided by BKI.
Rented from United Rentals. TempAir (Rupp
Industries) model TD 400. Dries up to 400
CFM. Intentionally undersized for this
application (since we don't require the usual
10% RH it is designed to deliver). Requires 230
V, 1 phase, 30 A, electric supply. Portable
desiccant-type dehumidifier. Alumina silicate
wheel continuously absorbs gas-phase water.
Heated slip-stream of dried air re-directed back
to used section of wheel to desorb water and
regenerate the wheel.
Purchased. 14 cubic feet, upright.
Purchased. 10 cubic feet, chest.
2.5 Maintenance and Calibration of Dynamometer, Analytical Trailer, and
Associated Sampling Equipment.
Dynamometer Static Load (Dead Weight) and Speed Calibrations:
Initial, and thereafter, daily, load cell checks were made using the available calibration
weights. Minor "zero" adjustments were periodically required. No span adjustments were made.
Results, shown below in Table 2-2, were consistent with historic data.
2-8
-------
Table 2-2. Static Load (Dead Weight) Checks
Total Weight
Equivalent Hp @ 50 MPH
5/1 7/04 Reading
5/1 9/04 Reading
5/20/04 Reading
5/2 1/04 Reading
5/22/04 Reading
5/23/04 Reading
5/25/04 Reading
5/26/04 Reading
Arbor +
W1+W2
SOlbs
18.5
18.5
18.4
18.3
18.5
18.4
18.4
18.3
18.3
Arbor +
Wl
401bs
14.8
14.9
14.7
14.6
14.7
14.6
14.7
14.6
14.6
Arbor +
W2
151bs
5.55
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.4
Arbor
51bs
1.85
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
Unloaded
Olbs
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Initial, and thereafter, daily dynamometer roll speed checks were also made. Roll speed
was checked using a phototachometer and compared to the driver's aid digital speed output. No
adjustments were required. Results are shown in Table 2-3.
Table 2-3. Dynamometer Roll Speed Checks
Date
5/1 7/04 Reading
5/1 9/04 Reading
5/20/04 Reading
5/2 1/04 Reading
5/22/04 Reading
5/23/04 Reading
5/24/04 Reading
5/25/04 Reading
5/26/04 Reading
Roll RPM
1930
1938
1959
1955
1962
1944
1941
1941
1958
Equivalent
Speed
49.5 mph
49.9
50.4
50.3
50.5
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.4
Driver's Aid Reading
49.7 mph
50.0
50.3
50.3
50.1
49.8
50.0
49.9
50.3
Dynamometer Coastdowns:
Daily dynamometer coastdowns were performed to verify overall dynamometer
operation. Coastdowns were performed from 55 to 45 mph at an inertia setting of 3,500 Ibs. and
a load setting of 6.0 Hp (indicated) @ 50 MPH, after a 10-15 minute warmup at 50 mph.
Coastdown times obtained are shown in Table 2-4, and indicated the dynamometer was operating
within its normal specifications.
2-9
-------
Table 2-4. Daily Coastdowns (Vehicle off Rolls) @ 3500 Ibs and 6.0 Hp Indicated
Date
5/1 7/04 Reading
5/20/04 Reading
5/2 1/04 Reading
5/22/04 Reading
5/23/04 Reading
5/24/04 Reading
5/25/04 Reading
5/26/04 Reading
CD #1 time, seconds
22.84
24.18
23.72
23.84
23.46
23.31
22.66
23.31
CD #2 time, seconds
23.17
24.49
23.28
24.26
23.88
24.07
22.86
22.77
CD #3 time, seconds
23.35
-
-
-
23.96
23.54
22.90
23.05
Prior to vehicle testing, coastdowns were also performed with the three correlation
vehicles on the rolls to determine appropriate load settings for each of the vehicles. Desired
coastdown times for each of the vehicles was provided by EPA, Ann Arbor. Table 2-5 gives
results of these initial vehicle coastdowns.
Table 2-5. Initial Correlation Vehicle Coastdowns
Vehicle
2004 Stratus
1988 Taurus
1988 New Yorker
Test Inertia, pounds
3,500
3,500
4,000
Desired 55-45 mph
Coastdown time,
seconds
17.86
17.30
17.59
Actual 55-45 mph
Coastdown time,
seconds
17.90 ±0.23
14.93 ±0.16
17.47 ±0.19
Coastdown times obtained for the Stratus and New Yorker agreed very well with the
desired coastdown times. Times for the Taurus could not be increased past -15 seconds, as the
dynamometer was fully unloaded at this point.
Vehicle coastdown times were checked on several additional days, immediately after the
conclusion of the vehicle's emissions test, and again at the end of the study. For all three
vehicles, the indicated load tended to be a little higher, and coastdown times a little shorter,
immediately after the emissions test. This phenomena could be duplicated by motoring the
vehicle above 60 mph for several seconds, but did not occur when motoring the vehicle below 60
mph. The apparent change in load is not clearly understood, but is thought to be due to
mechanisms within the dynamometer's Power Absorption Unit, possibly as a result of leaks,
cavitation, or aeration of the load fluid. Because this occurs apparently only after motoring at
speeds above 60 mph, one would expect the LA92 driving cycle to be impacted most from the
point in Phase 2 where maximum speeds are above 60 mph, and to extent into phase 3. That is,
the vehicles would be operating under slightly higher loads than initially preset.
2-10
-------
A major change in coastdown times occurred for the 1988 New Yorker during the course
of testing. The initial coastdown time of 17.47 seconds had decreased to ~ 12 seconds when
checked after the third day of testing. This could be due to brake "hang-up" (testing staff did
exercise the breaks quite a bit on the first two days of the LA92) affecting the vehicle's rolling
resistance. After this change was detected, we readjusted the load setting (from 10.3 indicated to
5.0 indicated) to yield coastdown times within the 17 second time frame. It should be noted that
warm start (phase 3) emissions exhibited no significant differences when using the two different
load settings.
Additional, high speed coastdowns (65mph to 35 mph, and 65 mph to 45 mph) were also
conducted on all three vehicles. It is assumed that the effect of dynamometer operation above 60
mph as described above would also affect these coastdowns.
Tables 2-6 through 2-8 below show results for the additional coastdown tests.
Table 2-6. Additional 2004 Stratus Coastdowns
Date
5/22/04
5/23/04
5/26/04
Speed
Range, mph
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
65-35
55-45
55-45
55-45
65-35
65-35
65-35
Coastdown
time, sec
12
12.49
14.95
16.54
30.2
17.05
16.99
17.09
49.4
50.7
51.62
Hp
Indicated
6.0
6.0
4.1
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
Comment
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
2-11
-------
Table 2-7. Additional 1988 Taurus Coastdowns
Date
5/22/04
5/24/04
5/26/04
Speed
Range, mph
55-45
65-45
55-45
65-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
65-35
65-35
65-35
55-45
55-45
55-45
65-35
65-35
65-35
Coastdown
time, sec
14.6
26.63
15.58
29.25
14.21
14.97
14.88
15.69
15.89
15.38
11.74
11.88
12.02
37.16
38.86
38.79
15.27
15.63
15.52
47.2
47.16
47.3
Hp
Indicated
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.3
3.3
o o
J.J
3.0
3.0
3.0
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Comment
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
2-12
-------
Table 2-8. Additional 1988 New Yorker Coastdowns
Date
5/22/04
5/23/04
5/24/04
5/26/04
Speed
Range, mph
55-45
65-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
55-45
65-35
65-35
65-35
55-45
55-45
55-45
65-35
65-35
65-35
Coastdown
time, sec
11.72
20.47
12.5
17.38
17.51
17.2
15.78
17.7
16.56
16.65
16.45
16.99
17.02
48.59
49.18
50.2
18.01
17.47
17.72
53.58
53.7
54.57
Hp
Indicated
11.3
11.3
10.3
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.5
5.5
5.0
5.0
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Comment
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
After test, reset to nominal value
Reset nominal from 10.3 to 5.0
Nominal is now 5.0
Nominal is now 5.0
Immediately after emission test
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
Immediately after emission test
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
After test, reset to nominal value
It is not clear whether the increased load when motoring the dynamometer over 60 mph is
due to a defective PAU or whether this response is an innate characteristic of the water brake
system. Most other studies with this unit have involved lower speed cycles, so this issue has not
been previously addressed.
CVS and Analytical System:
Propane injections were conducted on two separate occasions to verify dilution tunnel
flow. During the first set of injections, the dilution tunnel was heated to 47 C. During the second
set of injections, the dilution tunnel was operated at ambient temperature (~ 25 C). Results of the
injections are given in Table 2-9 and indicate the dilution tunnel flow was at normal levels.
2-13
-------
Table 2-9. CVS Propane Injections
Date
START MASS (GM)
FINISH MASS (GM)
TIME (MIN)
TEMP PDF, F
BARO PRES, (mmHg)
Pi, INCHES H20
CONC(B),PPM C
CONC(S),PPM C
COUNTS
VMIX
GMS PRO. CALC
GMS PRO. INJECTED
% Difference
ACFM
Vo
ACFM
Vo
SCFM
1
05/19/2004
860
849
10
116.6
740.00
11.00
2.10
136.90
17,700.00
4,681.12
10.92
11.00
-0.76
543.98
0.307
AVG
539.214
0.305
471.56
2
05/19/2004
849
838
10
118.8
740.00
11.00
2.20
137.10
17,700.00
4,663.32
10.88
11.00
-1.06
545.66
0.308
STD
6.995
0.004
471.21
3
05/19/2004
838
827.6
10
118.8
740.00
11.00
2.20
132.00
17,700.00
4,663.32
10.47
10.40
0.69
536.16
0.303
463.01
4
05/24/2004
827.2
819
10
84
734.00
11.00
2.60
98.30
17,700.00
4,920.27
8.15
8.20
-0.66
543.43
0.307
AVG
536.629
0.303
495.14
5
05/24/2004
819
811.2
10
84
734.00
11.00
2.70
96.60
17,700.00
4,920.27
7.99
7.80
2.47
526.83
0.298
STD
7.099
0.004
480.02
6
05/24/2004
811.2
803.5
10
84
734
11.00
3.4
93.9
17,700
4,920.27
7.70
7.70
0.04
539.62
0.305
491.67
Working gases (Zero air and FID fuel) were obtained locally from Kirk Gases. Span
gases were also ordered from Kirk, but did not arrive in time for use in the Pilot Study.
Alternately, span gases brought from RTF were used to span the gas analyzers. Pre-test spans for
NO were conducted with an 89.2 ppm NO in N2 mixture. Pre-test spans for CO, CO2 and THC
were conducted with a multi-component mixture containing 93.2 ppm C Propane, 90.1 ppm CO,
and 0.900 % CO2. Concentrations of these gases were verified in RTF, with primary calibration
gases, before being sent to KC. Additional calibration gases brought to KC included a 893 ppm
CO in air and a 931 ppm C (propane) in air mixture. Multipoint calibrations were performed on
each analyzer to verify linearity. Full Scale and downscale concentrations were generated using a
capillary type ten-point gas divider. Full scale and down scale instrument readings and slope and
correlation coefficient (r2) results from linear regression analysis are given in Table 2-10 for
each analyzer.
2-14
-------
Table 2-10. Gas Analyzer Linear Regression Analysis
F.S.
90 % FS
80 % FS
70 % FS
60 % FS
50 % FS
40 % FS
30 % FS
20 % FS
10 % FS
Zero Air
Slope
R2
NO
X
90.0 ppm
80.7
71.7
62.7
54.0
44.7
35.7
27.0
18.0
9.0
0.0
0.9971
1.0000
Hi CO
893 ppm
806.4
722.6
634.8
545.0
462.2
371.8
273.8
177.3
84.2
5.8
1.0105
0.9995
LoCO
90 ppm
79
71
62
54
45
36
27
19
11
0
0.9916
0.9990
CO2
0.892 %
0.798
0.714
0.615
0.533
0.446
0.352
0.265
0.176
0.086
0.002
0.9955
0.9999
HCl(sam)
93. 2 ppm C
83.7
74.6
64.5
55.8
46.5
37.1
27.8
18.6
9.2
0.0
0.0075
1.0000
HC2 (amb)
93. 2 ppm C
83.2
73.8
63.8
55.3
46.1
36.4
27.2
17.9
8.5
0.0
0.9898
0.9997
As a cross check, audit and span gases for the SEMTECH instruments were read on the
dynamometer bench. These results are given in Table 2-11.
Table 2-11. Analysis of PEMS Audit and Span Gases
Audit Gas
Dyno Bench
Vendor Analysis
Span Gas
Dyno Bench
Vendor Analysis
NOx, ppm
299
305
-
1,485
CO, ppm
189
198.8
1,240
1,203
CO2, %
5.89
6.045
11.20
12.02
Propane, ppm
48.3
49.6
194
200.6
2.5.1 Calibration and QC Testing of Associated Sampling Equipment
Prior to the start of the Pilot Study, all samplers were checked for leaks and the in-line
flow meters were cross calibrated using reference flow measurement devices. Leak testing was
performed by capping the inlet lines leading to each sampler and turning on the pumps. If the
flow meter readings decreased to less than 10% of the nominal sampling flow rate in a
reasonably short time, the system was passed. If not, the source of the leak was identified and
fixed, then the test was repeated. With the exception of the Teflon/Quartz filter sampler all units
achieved near-zero flow rates during the leak test. Due to the friable nature of the pre-fired
quartz filters it is not possible to obtain a perfect seal in the filter holders without damaging the
media, but the <10% criteria was still met for each filter individually and for the system as a
2-15
-------
whole. In addition to the vacuum test, the sum of flows through each of the two filter cartridges
was compared to the total flow entering the inlet and found to agree within 5%.
All flowmeters were calibrated using either a Gillibrator electronic bubble meter or a
rotameter that had been cross-calibrated with a Roots meter at DRI. Calibration flows were
measured at the inlet point of each sampler (or outlet for the canister sampler) with appropriate
sampling media installed. The resulting calibrations were used to determine the desired nominal
flow rates, and these were marked on a label on each flowmeter so that the operator could
observe any deviations during testing. Variations in nominal flow rate due to sampler problems
were recorded in a logbook. The only significant flow problems occurred with the canister
sampler, which was unable to provide adequate flow to pressurize the canister during 2 of the
tunnel blank runs due to accumulated moisture in the internal tubing. Frequent draining of the
accumulate moisture prevented additional data loss, but this may represent a future problem
unless the dilution air is dehumidified.
For each integrated sample, the run number, start and stop time, elapsed time, initial and
final flow rate, and any exceptional occurrences were recorded on log sheets which were kept
with the media at all times. Bar coded stickers with unique media IDs were attached to all media
and their corresponding log sheets for tracking. Immediately after the conclusion of each test
cycle the media were repacked with the log sheets and stored in a refrigerator, except for the
canisters, which were packed and shipped via 2-day express to DRI each day. At the conclusion
of the Pilot Study all media were packed into coolers with ice packs and shipped overnight back
to DRI where they were logged in and placed in cold storage until analysis.
Continuous data was backed up via the wireless network and processed at the end of each
sampling day to determine phase-averaged values. Run number, date, time, and vehicle license
plate number were attached to all files to identify the data.
2.6 QC Tests and Preparation of the Dilution Tunnel
Two issues regarding dilution tunnel operation, operating temperature and sample hang-
up, were to be examined during the Pilot Study. Concerning operating temperature, it was
desired to operate the dilution tunnel at 47 ± 5 °C. For this purpose, an inlet air heater was
installed to heat the dilution air entering the tunnel. The heater, requiring 480 VAC 3-phase
power, was powered by a diesel-fueled generator placed outside of the building. Temperature of
the diluted exhaust was monitored near the PM and regulated emissions sampling points (at the
PDF entrance, some 30 feet downstream of the heater) using a type J thermocouple. This
thermocouple also served as the feedback control for the heater. The dilution tunnel and
2-16
-------
sampling fittings were insulated to an R17 value using thin aluminum foiled bubble wrap
insulating material. During vehicle testing, the second-by-second temperature of the diluted
exhaust was recorded with the real time data acquisition system. Small adjustments were made to
the temperature controller during the first two days of vehicle tests to fine-tune control. A plot of
the diluted exhaust air temperatures obtained for all three vehicles on the final day of testing is
given in Figure 2-2. Minimum observed temperatures were within the 47 ± 5 °C window for all
three vehicles. Maximum observed temperatures exceeded the 47 ± 5 °C, most noticeably with
the New Yorker. The higher than desired temperatures were due to heat being added from the
vehicle's exhaust during high speed operation, and not due to heater malfunction. Figure 23-
shows a plot of the distribution of diluted exhaust temperatures for the three vehicles.
Temperature distributions for all three vehicles are slightly skewed toward the higher
temperatures, again indicative of the heat added by the exhaust. As indicated in the distribution
plots, the maximum desired temperature (52 C) was exceeded only a small percentage of the
time (less than 1.5 % of the time) with the Taurus and Stratus, but almost ~ 12 % of the time
with the New Yorker.
2-17
-------
Diluted Exhaust Temperatures
Over the LA 92 Driving Cycle
1988 Taurus
Time, Seconds
1988 New Yorker
2004 Stratus
Figure 2-2. Diluted Exhaust Temperatures
Dis
500
| 400
£
£ 300
ro
Q
° 200
1
= 100
0
itribution of Diluted Exhaust Temperatures
n n
I 'f1
111
40 42 44 46
D 1988 Taurus
n
J
|
1
flllrlU JLjl n n . .
48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64
Temperature, Degrees C
• 1988 New Yorker D 2004 Stratus
Figure 2-3. Diluted Exhaust Temperature Distribution
2-18
-------
The second issue with regards to the dilution tunnel was to quantify any sample hang-up
that may occur with THC and particulate matter, and to determine an appropriate tunnel purge
time to minimize THC and particulate carry over to subsequent emissions tests. Tunnel THC
emissions were measured during the 10 minute engine-off period of the LA92 cycle, and also on
daily "blanks" conducted along with the Particulate Matter blanks. Very little THC sample hang-
up was noted in the dilution tunnel. Figure 2-4 illustrates measured THC concentrations in the
tunnel during the 10-minute engine off period during testing of the 1988 New Yorker, the highest
emitter of the three correlation vehicles. Shown are concentrations measured at two locations.
The Heated FID (HFID) Sample Port is located adjacent to the PDF and is the location normally
used for sampling diluted exhaust. The background port is located upstream of the raw exhaust
entry port and measures the treated dilution air. On three of the runs, THC was inadvertently
sampled through a cold sample port and cold line. Data collected from the cold port on one of
these tests is also included in the plot to contrast with the measurements collected through the
normally used heated port and heated lines. As can be seen in the graph, THC levels at the HFID
sample port quickly dropped from 10 ppm at the start of the soak, to background levels within 2
minutes. (The HFID trace appears to be much noisier because it was operated on the 0-1,000
ppmC range vs. the background, which was operated on the 0-100 ppmC range.). Conversely,
the concentration of the THC sample collected through the cold sample line had not reached
background levels at the conclusion of the 10-minute soak. This emphasizes the need to maintain
heat to all sampling components when measuring THC.
2-19
-------
THC Levels in Tunnel
During 10 minute soak
10
o
I
Q.
61 121 181 241 301 361 421 481 541 601
Time, seconds
Cold Sampling Port HFID Sample Port Background Port
Figure 2-4. THC Levels in Dilution Tunnel.
2-20
-------
2.7 SEMTECH Setup
2.7.1 General Pilot Study Issues
ERG and BKI staff prepared three SEMTECH units for service (units SG-01, SG-04 and
SG-06). Units SG-01 and SG-04 were both used at different times for dynamometer testing, and
unit SG-04 was used on all preconditioning drive testing.
In an effort to increase the accuracy of audit and calibration procedures, audits and
calibrations were performed using the SEMTECH's sample port (rather than the zero and span
ports). However, this change in procedure resulted in an inadvertent draining of the span and
zero gasses (the sample port is not equipped with an auto shut-off solenoid as are the span and
zero ports). Therefore, some testing conducted between the afternoon of Thursday, May 20, and
the morning of Monday, May 24, was conducted using out of range SEMTECH equipment. To
avoid this in the future, all zeros, audits, and spans will be performed using the zero and span
ports on the SEMTECH, rather than drawing through the sample port. Additional information on
testing conducted using out of range equipment is provided in Sections 2.8.2 and 2.8.3 below.
The flash cards used for SEMTECH memory and processing and appear to have been
switched among the three SEMTECH units. Since these cards have unit-specific information,
this switching appears to have created some SEMTECH initialization issues, primarily odd
operation errors and communication issues between the host computers and the SEMTECH
units. To prevent future problems, all SEMTECH firmware was updated (upon automatic
prompting) in all three units, all out of date SEMTECH software was deleted from host
computers, and current software (version 9.1) was reloaded onto all host computers. Sensors
staff was helpful in diagnosing SEMTECH initialization and software problems.
Possibly due to the number of wireless networks in use at the test facility, some
communication problems were identified between the SEMTECHs and their host computers. To
resolve this problem, communication between the three SEMTECHs and their host computers
were converted from wireless communication to a direct Ethernet cable connection (through
resetting of the connection properties and reassignment of a fixed IP address). Ethernet
communication is anticipated for future testing to help prevent problems associated with wireless
communication.
The SEMTECH units do not record calibration or audit results (or gas concentrations
used for audits/calibrations), so individual test files were created while performing all audits and
calibrations during the Pilot Study. Individual test records will be used to record calibration and
2-21
-------
audit results during Phase 1 testing. This will ensure all audit and calibration results are captured
and retained for future analysis. Future SEMTECH software is expected to record calibration
and audit results
Despite multiple efforts, no vehicle interface (VI) communication was established with
the 3 correlation vehicles or with other rental vehicles during the Pilot Study. We will be
working with Sensors staff to resolve VI problems prior to the start of Phase 1 testing.
EPA comparison of vehicle exhaust flow rates as measured by the dynamometer with
those measured by the SEMTECH flow meter revealed a possible bias in the SEMTECH's flow
rate measurement. The EPA has been working with Sensors to correct this issue. Sensors has
reportedly corrected the Pilot Study data and will revise the SEMTECH processing software to
eliminate this problem.
Data collection and tracking procedures for SEMTECH test, audit and calibration files
were developed to allow daily tracking of all SEMTECH data collected during the study. Since
SEMTECHs don't currently record audit and span calibration results, all audits and span
calibrations performed during the pilot were individually recorded as test files. Future
SEMTECH software updates will apparently all the units to record audit and span calibration
results.
2.7.2 SEMTECH Sampling during Preconditioning Runs
Prior to performing preconditioning runs, a preconditioning drive route believed to be
equivalent to the LA92 drive trace was developed. Rental car drives along this route resulted in
unacceptable speeds and delays, so this preliminary route was modified. Due to extensive on-
going road construction near the test facility, future revisions of this route are possible. Speed,
time, and acceleration information of the preconditioning run is presented in Section 4.
Preconditioning drives were performed on all three correlation vehicles using SEMTECH
unit SG-04. The 1988 Ford Taurus (license number EPA975) and the 2004 Dodge Stratus
(license number 52083) received preconditioning drives on 5/22/04. Review of the audit records
performed prior to these two drives indicates possible CO bias. As shown in the dyne
SEMTECH table below, (Table 2-12) this unit was also seen to have a CO bias in subsequent
testing. During this time period (5/20 to 5/24), span calibration gas was not available to
recalibrate the SEMTECH.
2-22
-------
Table 2-12. Dynamometer SEMTECH Test Issues During Pilot
Date
5/20/04
5/20/04
5/20/04
5/21/04
5/22/04
5/22/04
5/22/04
5/23/04
5/24/04
5/24/04
5/24/04
Unit
ID
SG-01
N/A
SG-01
SG-01
SG-01
SG-01
SG-01
SG-01
SG-04
N/A
SG-04
Approx
Start Time
13:55
N/A
15:10
N/A
09:45
11:05
13:30
10:05
10:50
N/A
12:10
Vehicle
88
Taurus
N/A
88 New
Yorker
All
04
Stratus
88
Taurus
88 New
Yorker
04
Stratus
88
Taurus
N/A
88 New
Yorker
Plate
EPA975
N/A
707WHY
All
52083
EPA975
707WHY
52083
EPA975
N/A
707WHY
Notes
Questionable HC readings for this test
Test faults, and warnings indicated that the
system had improper vacuum readings on
drains 1 and 2 and improper sample flows.
Also, test notes indicate HC calibration may not
be within range (and span calibrations were not
able to bring HC into range). Discussion with
Sensors ruled out the possibility of the incorrect
FID fuel pressure setting being the root cause.
Zero and span calibration gasses were
inadvertently depleted in the early afternoon
(after test of EPA975 but prior to 707WHY).
Explanation provided in Section 2.8.1.
Questionable HC readings for this test
Test notes indicate pre-test audit failed for high
HC. No span gas, could not recalibrate
SEMTECH.
Test notes do not indicate any pre-test audit
issues.
Test notes indicate SEMTECH passed all audit
gasses
Questionable HC readings for this test
SEMTECH failed HC audit, no span gas with
which to recalibrate
Questionable HC readings for this test
SEMTECH failed HC audit, no span gas with
which to recalibrate
Questionable HC readings for this test
SEMTECH failed HC audit, no span gas with
which to recalibrate
Questionable CO readings for this test
SEMTECH SG-01 replaced with SG-04. SG-
04 failed CO audit, no span gas with which to
recalibrate.
Replacement span calibration gas arrived in late
morning
SG-04 initially failed CO audit, recalibrated
with CO span, and re-audit then passed.
2.7.3 SEMTECH Sampling during Dynamometer Testing
SEMTECH testing was performed concurrently with dynamometer testing (using Units
SG-01 and SG-04). Specific differences between use of the SEMTECH for dynamometer testing
vs. in-vehicle testing include:
2-23
-------
• Rather than exhausting to the environment, the exhaust sample was drawn from
the SEMTECH's sample port and flow meter tube into the transition tube feeding
the dynamometer's CVS
• No GPS input was used
• An analog voltage signal proportional to dynamometer roller speed (ratio of 0.1
volt = 1 mph) was connected to external analog input 3.
• An external event marker switch was used to indicate the start of a run, and also
to distinguish between test phases. However, for accuracy purposes, test-phase
delineation will be based on test timing rather than manually inserted markers.
As mentioned in Section 2.7.1, some dynamometer testing was performed with "out of
range" SEMTECHs. Details are presented in Table 2-12 below.
2.7.4 SEMTECH Testing during Customer Drive-Aways
No drive-away testing was performed during the Pilot Study, but some issues to consider
for Round 1 testing were discussed. A primary concern for drive-away testing is motorist safety
and installation integrity. In particular, the current method for installing the exhaust tube flow
meter assembly requires hanging the tube off the license plate mount with extension rods and a
suction-cup mounted support brace. In addition to being a potential burn hazard, this may not
offer sufficient stability for long-term (i.e., one day) usage. Alternative mounting procedures are
currently being considered. The objective is to develop an efficient method of mounting this
assembly under the rear bumper without the need to weld or drill. As an alternative for some
1996 or newer vehicles (for which a VI is established), exhaust flow information may be
gathered from the OBDII data stream collected by the SEMTECH units. With EPA approval,
this OBDII information may be used in place of actual flow meter data, in installations where
installation of the long flow meter tube poses a safety risk. In addition, Sensors has designed an
alternative flow meter which is much shorter than the current design requirements (pressure
differential vs. hot-wire anemometer). Testing is currently underway, and if this new flowmeter
is found to have sufficient precision and accuracy, use of it may facilitate drive-away
installations. Comparison testing between both flow meter designs is planned for Round 1
dyne/SEMTECH testing.
The SEMTECH and one or two large batteries placed in the trunk may also pose a
potential safety risk (projectile, spark/flame, and acid burn hazard in the event of an accident).
To minimize these risks, an attempt will be made to strap the battery (or batteries) to the
SEMTECH unit and also to tether the SEMTECH to a frame or latch section of the trunk.
2-24
-------
Velcro will be used on the bottom of the SEMTECH units to reduce slippage and movement
during everyday driving.
2-25
-------
3.0 Testing of EPA Correlation Vehicles (Testing Schedule):
Each of the three correlation vehicles was tested over the three-phase, cold start LA92
test cycle according to the table below. All three vehicles were tested in triplicate with the
dilution tunnel heater engaged (~ 47 C.). Both the Taurus and New Yorker were also tested in
triplicate with the dilution tunnel at ambient temperature. One LA92 on the Stratus (Run #84011)
was voided because the vehicle was tested using the wrong dynamometer settings. An additional
LA92 was conducted on this vehicle to produce 3 valid tests.
Figure 3-1 describes the LA92 cycle graphically. Figure 3-2 shows the
speed/acceleration contour plot for the cycle and Table 3-1 displays the speed acceleration
profile in tabular form.
Collection of daily blanks were also assigned run numbers. The blanks were collected
from the dilution tunnel with the raw exhaust transfer tube sealed, i.e. with only treated dilution
air entering the dilution tunnel. Table 3-2 lists in numerical order the tests conducted and
provides a brief description of conditions for each test. Table 3-3 groups the vehicle tests into
groups by vehicle and indicated Hp.
5-1
-------
Speed Trace
LA92 Cycle
Q_
CD
CD
Q_
GO
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1000 2000
Time (sees)
15
10
-5 Q_
£
h -10
o
h -15 V
CD
O
O
h -20 <
- -25
- -30
- -35
3000
summ_la92range.sas 18JUN04 08:37
Figure 3-1. Contour Plot Showing the Speed/Acceleration Distribution of the LA92
3-2
-------
Speed — Acceleration Distribution
LA92 Cycle
m
_n
o_
o
-t-^
o
0)
o
o
-10
10
15
20
0.01
0.20
25
Speed (mph)
0.02
0.50
0.05
1.00
0.10
2.00
summ_la92range.sas 18JUN04 08:37
Figure 3-2. LA92 Speed Trace
-------
Table 3-1. Speed-Acceleration for the LA92 Cycle
Speed - Acceleration Distribution
LA92 Cycle
08:37 Friday, June 18, 2004
Speed
(mph)
= 0
>0 < = 5
>5 <=10
>10 <=15
>15 <=20
>20 <=25
>25 <=30
>30 <=35
>35 <=40
>40 <=45
>45 <=50
>50 <=55
>55 <=60
>60 <=65
>65 <=70
All
Acceleration (mph/s)
>-9
<=-8
(%)
h
0.12
0.12
0.17
0.12
0.52
>-8
<=-7
h
h
0.06
0.06
>-7
<=-6
h
h
0.12
0.12
0.23
>-6
<=-5
h
h
0.29
0.17
0.12
0.29
0.12
0.06
1.04
>-5
<=-4
h
h
0.23
0.17
0.23
0.35
0.35
0.12
0.06
0.06
0.06
1.61
>-4
<=-3
h
h
0.81
0.69
0.58
0.52
0.63
0.12
0.12
0.12
0 . 17
0.12
0.06
3 .91
>-3
<=-2
h
h
0.06
0.75
0.92
0.35
0.35
0.29
0.46
0.12
0.06
0.12
3 .45
>-2
<=-!
h
h
0.63
1.27
0.35
0.81
0.86
0.63
0.81
0.75
0.12
0 . 17
0.29
0.12
0.06
0.12
6.96
>-l
<0
h
h
0.52
0.98
0.12
1.21
0.86
0.98
1.96
1.27
1.55
1 .78
0.81
1.15
1.27
0.40
14.84
= 0
h
h
17.61
0.81
1.15
0.69
0.98
1.61
0.75
1.38
0.75
0.75
1.32
1.32
0.35
29.46
>0
< = 1
h
h
1.09
0.12
0.46
0.52
1.78
2.36
1.50
2.07
1 .44
1.38
0.29
1.09
1.50
0.40
16.00
>1
< = 2
h
h
1 .44
0.35
0.98
1.21
1.55
2.01
2.13
0.86
0.69
0.29
0.23
0.35
0.12
0.06
12.26
>2
< = 3
h
h
0.69
0.23
0.81
1.27
0.81
0.75
0.23
0.06
0.06
4.89
>3
< = 4
h
h
0.23
0.98
0.69
0.63
0.63
0 . 17
0.12
0.06
0.12
3 .62
>4
< = 5
h
h
0.29
0.29
0.12
0.06
0.75
>5
< = 6
h
h
0.17
0.12
0.29
>6
< = 7
h
h
0.12
0.12
All
h
h
18.81
8.57
4.78
8.00
7 .77
8.98
10.41
7.13
6.33
5.24
3 .68
0.69
4.09
4.32
1.21
100.0
3-4
-------
Table 3-2. Schedule and Description of Pilot Study Emissions Tests.
Date
05/20/2004
05/20/2004
05/20/2004
05/20/2004
05/21/2004
05/21/2004
05/21/2004
05/21/2004
05/22/2004
05/22/2004
05/22/2004
05/22/2004
05/23/2004
05/24/2004
05/24/2004
05/24/2004
05/25/2004
05/25/2004
05/25/2004
05/26/2004
05/26/2004
05/26/2004
Time
10:30 AM
"Lunch"
"PM"
"PM"
9:30 AM
11:00 AM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
9:00 AM
10:30 AM
1:00 PM
2:30 PM
9:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:30 AM
11:30 AM
9:00 AM
10:30 AM
12:00 PM
9:00 AM
10:30 AM
12:00 PM
License
Number
52083
Blank
EPA975
707WHY
52083
EPA975
707WHY
Blank
52083
EPA975
707WHY
Blank
52083
EPA975
707WHY
Blank
EPA975
707WHY
Blank
EPA975
707WHY
Blank
BKI
Run
Number
84003
84004
84005
84006
84007
84008
84009
84010
84011
84012
84013
84014
84015
84016
84017
84018
84019
84020
84021
84022
84023
84024
Notes
Test blank
Test blank
Test Aborted: Wrong test inertia was used
Test blank
Test blank
Test blank
Test blank
DOW
T
T
T
T
F
F
F
F
S
S
S
S
Su
M
M
M
T
T
T
W
W
W
Vehicle
Stratus
Taurus
New Yorker
Stratus
Taurus
New Yorker
Stratus
Taurus
New Yorker
Stratus
Taurus
New Yorker
Taurus
New Yorker
Taurus
New Yorker
Desired
Oil Tun
Temp
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Actual
Oil Tun
Temp, C
48.5
47.3
48.1
46.8
46.8
48
46.9
48.1
46.8
29
33
22.4
25
23.5
26.6
Test
Temp
F
81.2
86.9
88.2
82.6
84.8
87.6
81.1
83.8
85.1
78.6
78.8
82.1
67.5
67.9
67.2
70.5
% Rel
Hum
76.5
68.5
63.9
73.9
70.3
58.0
73.5
68.8
68.1
72.9
81.3
76.3
82.5
72.2
69.6
65.1
3-5
-------
Table 3-3. Description of Correlation Tests.
Stratus
Taurus
Taurus
New
Yorker
New
Yorker
Run #'s
84003
84007
84015
84005
84008
84012
84016
84019
84022
84006
84009
84013
84017
84020
84023
Dilution Tunnel Temp.
48. 5 ± 2.9 C
46.8 ± 1.9C
46.8 ± 1.7C
47.3 ± 3.4 C
46.8 ± 2.0 C
46.9 ±2.1 C
29.0 ±3. 3 C
22.4 ±3. 8 C
23. 5 ±3. 7 C
48.1±4.1 C
48.0±3.6C
48.1±3.6C
33.0±5.5C
25.0±5.1 C
26.6 ± 5.4 C
Ambient
Temp.
81.2F
82.6 F
82.9 F
86.9 F
84.8 F
83.4 F
78. 8 F
67.5 F
67.2 F
88.2 F
87.6 F
85.1
82. IF
67.9 F
70.5 F
Inertia,
Ibs.
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
Hp
Indicated
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
10.3
10.3
10.3
5.0
5.0
5.0
-------
4.0 Pilot Study Emission Results
4.1 Ann Arbor Emissions Testing
Vehicles
Three vehicles were selected for correlation testing at the EPA test facility in Ann Arbor,
Michigan and at the Kansas City test site based on their paniculate mater (PM) emissions. The
goal was to select one vehicle that had low PM emissions, another with moderate PM emissions,
and one with high PM emissions. It is believed that this approach would best describe the
precision of the project's data. This approach also allows the project to utilize EPA's current
correlation data between EPA test sites and those of the automotive manufacturers, thereby
adding further value to the project's measurements. EPA currently has such correlation
measurements for spark ignition vehicles for total hydrocarbon (THC), oxides of nitrogen (NOX),
carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH/j), and fuel consumption.
The low emission vehicle selected was a 2004 Dodge Stratus, the moderate emission
vehicle a 1988 Ford Taurus, and the high emitter a 1988 Chrysler New Yorker. Initially, the
Taurus was to be the high emitting vehicle. Its catalyst was hollowed out and made ineffective.
However, the vehicle had only 12,000 miles on the odometer and the PM emissions were judged
to be to relatively low. The Chrysler New Yorker proved to be a better choice, producing visible
smoke from the exhaust and higher emissions than the Taurus. Except for disabling the catalyst
on the Ford Taurus and a fuel exchange to the test fuel, vehicles were tested as they were
received. The following table summarized the vehicles used in the test program.
Vehicle
Stratus
Taurus
New Yorker
Plate ID
G1252083
EPA975
707WHY
Model
Year
2004
1988
1988
Emission
Standard
Tier 2
TierO
TierO
Engine
2.7 LV6
3.0LV6
3.0 LV6
Odometer
8,993
12,709
203,435
Test and Measurement Conditions
Ambient conditions were standard for the Federal Test Procedure (FTP), nominally 75
degrees Fahrenheit and 50 grains per pound of dry air at 60 degrees Fahrenheit. The sampling
procedure and condition for all vehicles featured tail pipe emissions measured dilute with room
temperature air (approximately 25 degrees Centigrade) at a bulk stream flow rate of 350 scfm.
THC and NOx were measured continuously. THC, NOx, CO, CO2, PM were mechanically
integrated at the phase level using Tedlar bags and filters. The PM testing used 47mm diameter
4-1
-------
2.0-Micron Teflon filters manufactured by Pall. The flow rates for the filters were nominally
0.88 scfm. The dilution tunnel was 10-inch diameter insulated with fiberglass insulation.
The filters were conditioned and weighted as specified under 40 CFR Part 86 for model
year 2007 heavy duty engine testing. The balance has seven-place precision (10* of microgram)
and was mounted on a table supported by compressed air.
The vehicles were tested on a single roll 48" electric dynamometer. The dynamometer
settings were similar to those used each vehicle's emission certification. However, the Taurus
and the New Yorker were certified on a twin-roll water break dynamometer. Furthermore, the
Taurus was tested at 150 pounds less, and the New Yorker at 450 pounds greater, than their
certification test weights. The alternate weights were chosen out of necessity to match the
resolution of the Kansas City dynamometer and the desire to increase emissions in the New
Yorker. The following table summarizes each vehicle's dynamometer settings.
Vehicle
Stratus
Taurus
New
Yorker
Test
Weight
(Ibs.)
3500
3500
4000
aDyno
coef
(Ibs.)
15.47
5.66
4.84
b Dyno
coef
(Ibs./MPH)
-0.3290
0.0355
0.0426
c Dyno
coef
(lbs/MPHA2)
0.02240
0.02111
0.02498
Average 55-45
mph coast
(seconds)
17.86
17.30
17.59
The PM sample zone temperature for the Ann Arbor tests was uncontrolled. This was in
variance to what was called for in the statement of work (47 degrees C). Though uncontrolled,
all tests had sample zone temperatures between 23 and 29 degrees C. The sample zone
temperature tended to rise from ambient after vehicle start to the end of the first phase, decline
during the vehicle soak, and increase during the third phase. A typical temperature profile is
provided in Figure 1.
4-2
-------
Figure 1
22
Seconds
Test Fuel
The test fuel used for all correlation testing was Federal Test Procedure Certification Fuel
having the following properties.
Item
Vapor Pressure
Distillation
initial boiling point
10% evaporated
50% evaporated
90% evaporated
end point
Sulfur
Lead
Phosphorous
Hydrocarbon Composition
olefins
aromatics
saturates
Research octane number
Motor octane number
Antiknock index
Sensitivity
Method
Grabner
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 2622
ASTM D 3237
ASTM D 3231
ASTMD 1319
ASTM D 2699
ASTM D 2700
ASTM D 439
RON-MON
Units
psi
°F
°F
°F
°F
°F
PPM
g/gal
g/gal
Vol %
Vol %
Vol %
Target
8.7-9.2
75-95
120-135
200-230
300-325
415 MAX.
0.003 - .0045
0.01 MAX.
0.005 MAX.
10 MAX.
35 MAX.
REMAINDER
96.0 MIN.
7.5 MIN.
VALUES
8.91
92
124
221
311
395
0.0035
0.0
0.0001
2.6
30.9
66.5
96.6
87.4
92.0
9.2
4-3
-------
Weight fraction carbon
Net heat of combustion
API Gravity
Specific gravity (60 F/60 F)
ASTM D 3343
ASTM D 3338
ASTM D 4052
Fuel economy numerator (g carbon/gal)
BTU/LB
°API
2401-2441
0.8667219
18436.899
58.9
0.7431723
2433
Preconditioning
The vehicle fuel tanks were drained of any residual gasoline and filled with the test fuel.
The vehicles were then preconditioned before the first test with the dynamometer coefficient
derivation procedure and a single LA92. All following tests used the previous test as
preconditioning. In all instances the vehicles were tested several times before obtaining the
results reported here. (The earlier tests were conducted at inertia weights that were not
consistent with the Kansas City dynamometer.)
Test Data
The emission results from the Ann Arbor testing are found in Table 4-1.
Post-Test Preparation for Kansas City
An inspection of vehicle fluids was performed after testing. However, only test fuel was
added to each vehicle.
4-4
-------
Table 4-1. Summary of Ann Arbor Results
License Plate
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
Test Date
04/20/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
04/20/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
04/20/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
04/20/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
04/20/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
Bag#
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
o
J
o
J
3
3
o
J
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
Miles per gallon
12.402
12.538
12.286
12.226
12.138
20.325
20.581
20.024
20.111
20.052
15.072
15.154
14.775
14.811
14.872
13.267
13.088
13.456
13.104
13.303
22.361
22.41
22.73
22.601
22.688
CH4 (gpm)
0.188
0.183
0.194
0.191
0.193
0.08
0.074
0.076
0.076
0.069
0.111
0.117
0.12
0.137
0.11
0.148
0.151
0.161
0.2
0.196
0.065
0.063
0.063
0.063
0.064
CO (gpm)
25.414
24.1
26.396
23.761
26.286
8.039
7.826
6.928
7.157
5.89
14.086
14.135
17.3
16.242
14.464
25.897
28.92
29.673
29.92
29.82
13.328
13.73
13.126
13.004
13.153
C02 (gpm)
667.634
661.936
672.623
680.805
681.961
423.09
418.133
431.629
429.27
432.803
563.607
559.748
569.687
569.721
570.683
617.341
622.316
602.62
619.329
609.913
370.998
369.915
365.109
367.479
365.632
THC (gpm)
3.202
3.188
3.276
3.127
3.18
0.697
0.649
0.634
0.656
0.58
1.519
1.713
1.75
1.806
1.607
4.058
3.881
3.853
4.07
3.887
1.93
1.799
1.847
1.867
1.897
NOx (gpm)
1.16
1.262
1.401
1.349
1.415
1.096
1.058
1.206
1.163
1.16
1.347
1.647
1.715
1.713
1.676
5.875
6.191
5.782
5.722
5.896
3.947
3.927
3.83
3.65
3.7
PM (micro gpm)
35.407
35.516
82.194
55.49
50.244
33.007
19.404
31.789
20.523
25.919
13.94
16.952
15.452
17.765
15.935
32.016
11.46
11.964
22.228
13.908
10.093
6.39
8.815
5.846
4.814
4-5
-------
License Plate
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
G1252083
Test Date
04/20/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
04/21/2004
04/22/2004
04/27/2004
04/28/2004
Bag#
3
o
J
o
J
o
J
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
o
J
Miles per gallon
15.643
15.645
15.742
15.654
15.751
14.506
14.487
14.112
14.161
25.17
25.246
24.944
24.827
17.942
17.823
17.826
17.692
CH4 (gpm)
0.127
0.119
0.127
0.123
0.128
0.025
0.026
0.027
0.028
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.004
0.017
0.017
0.009
0.008
CO (gpm)
20.455
21.487
20.811
22.147
21.39
3.785
3.677
4.309
4.177
0.321
0.361
0.361
0.29
0.672
0.792
0.44
0.263
CO2 (gpm)
527.129
525.609
523.356
524.237
522.037
606.135
607.069
622.154
620.365
353.06
351.919
356.181
358.016
494.927
497.985
498.582
502.671
THC (gpm)
3.076
3.015
2.952
3.015
2.982
0.487
0.496
0.572
0.513
0.022
0.027
0.029
0.017
0.038
0.062
0.018
0.012
NOx (gpm)
6.1
5.994
6.198
5.602
5.605
0.464
0.524
0.433
0.45
0.116
0.117
0.103
0.112
0.073
0.099
0.072
0.097
PM (micro gpm)
5.219
6.164
6.434
4.193
6.354
1.05
2.428
1.958
1.89
0.636
0.5
0.412
0.449
2.883
0.702
0.123
1.058
4-6
-------
4.2 Regulated Emission Results
Regulated emission rates were calculated using modal (second-by-second) data. Table 4-
2 gives individual phase emission rates for each run as well as average emission results and
standard deviations. Two sets of tests were conducted on the Taurus and New Yorker, one set
with the dilution tunnel temperature of- 47 C, the other set with an unheated tunnel temperature
at about 25 C. Ambient temperatures were also a bit cooler while the second set of tests were
being conducted. The effect of ambient temperature can be seen with Phase 1, and to a lesser
degree, Phase 2 emissions being higher for tests conducted at the lower ambient temperature.
Phase 3 emissions were not much affected by differences in ambient temperature.
Table 4-2 Regulated Emission Results
Stratus
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Run#
84003
84007
84015
Avg
Std Dev
84003
84007
84015
Avg
Std Dev
84003
84007
84015
Avg
Std Dev
HC gin/mi
0.583
0.546
0.625
0.585
0.032
0.054
0.027
0.032
0.038
0.012
0.056
0.013
0.042
0.037
0.018
CO gm/mi
3.104
3.188
3.276
3.190
0.070
0.353
0.310
0.341
0.335
0.018
0.181
0.339
0.421
0.313
0.100
CO2 gm/mi
645.718
655.967
637.369
646.352
7.606
381.530
394.385
385.275
387.063
5.398
519.757
544.240
509.885
524.627
14.442
NOx gm/mi
0.501
0.602
0.439
0.514
0.067
0.090
0.116
0.091
0.099
0.012
0.163
0.181
0.142
0.162
0.016
Taurus, Set 1
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Run#
84005
84008
84012
Avg
Std Dev
84005
84008
84012
Avg
Std Dev
84005
84008
84012
Avg
Std Dev
HC gm/mi
5.331
5.038
5.525
5.298
0.200
2.327
2.280
2.285
2.297
0.021
3.814
3.569
3.822
3.735
0.117
CO gm/mi
35.355
32.677
34.414
34.149
1.109
18.269
17.460
17.879
17.869
0.330
25.318
22.886
22.086
23.430
1.374
CO2 gm/mi
674.961
664.854
673.240
671.018
4.415
421.760
414.705
414.843
417.103
3.294
575.042
569.298
569.178
571.173
2.736
NOx gm/mi
10.419
10.300
9.987
10.236
0.182
8.754
8.608
8.186
8.516
0.241
10.761
10.790
10.476
10.676
0.142
Taurus, Set 2
4-7
-------
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Run#
84016
84019
84022
Avg
Std Dev
84016
84019
84022
Avg
Std Dev
84016
84019
84022
Avg
Std Dev
HC gm/mi
5.936
6.582
6.244
6.254
0.264
2.370
2.417
2.451
2.413
0.033
3.926
3.770
3.871
3.856
0.064
CO gm/mi
39.941
45.075
43.291
42.769
2.128
19.429
20.351
20.860
20.213
0.592
22.678
24.220
24.729
23.876
0.872
CO2 gm/mi
685.902
683.585
674.279
681.255
5.023
425.062
437.324
440.050
434.146
6.519
577.758
568.340
572.297
572.798
3.861
NOx gm/mi
10.080
8.725
8.569
9.124
0.678
8.348
7.556
7.327
7.744
0.437
10.601
9.199
8.646
9.482
0.823
New Yorker, Set 1
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Run#
84006
84009
84013
Avg
Std Dev
84006
84009
84013
Avg
Std Dev
84006
84009
84013
Avg
Std Dev
HC gm/mi
5.662
5.435
3.297
4.798
1.065
1.012
1.018
0.403
0.811
0.289
2.085
2.331
2.119
2.178
0.109
CO gm/mi
32.782
29.070
26.859
29.570
2.444
10.972
12.077
14.804
12.618
1.610
17.026
26.558
19.142
20.909
4.087
CO2 gm/mi
693.806
685.725
707.918
695.816
9.171
496.552
479.766
481.561
485.960
7.526
611.411
593.735
596.187
600.444
7.819
NOx gm/mi
2.413
2.326
2.167
2.302
0.102
2.210
2.184
2.338
2.244
0.067
2.304
2.195
2.662
2.387
0.200
New Yorker, Set 2
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Run#
84017
84020
84023
Avg
Std Dev
84017
84020
84023
Avg
Std Dev
84017
84020
84023
Avg
Std Dev
HC gm/mi
5.947
7.355
6.866
6.723
0.584
1.303
1.205
1.344
1.284
0.058
2.321
2.244
1.930
2.165
0.169
CO gm/mi
31.166
26.316
27.266
28.250
2.098
10.445
8.681
8.933
9.353
0.779
20.433
18.255
17.664
18.784
1.190
CO2 gm/mi
718.395
725.995
737.880
727.423
8.018
465.075
448.938
454.931
456.314
6.660
609.247
591.832
598.233
599.771
7.193
NOx gm/mi
2.350
1.965
2.189
2.168
0.158
1.997
1.675
1.752
1.808
0.137
2.550
2.103
2.390
2.348
0.185
4-8
-------
Percent standard deviations for each set of triplicate tests were calculated as a measure of
precision, and are presented in Table 4-3. A good level of precision was found for the regulated
emissions. Percent standard deviations (%SD) were less than 2 % for CO2 for all three
correlation vehicles, except Phase 3 Stratus CO2 emissions, which had a %SD of 2.8 %. In
general, HC, CO, and NOx % SDs were within 5 %- 10 %. Higher %SDs were seen in the case
of extremely low emissions, for instance Phase 2 and 3 HC emissions and Phase 1 and 2 NOx
emissions for the Stratus. Higher %SDs were also noted for HC and CO emissions for the first
set of New Yorker tests. The high HC %SD is the result of low Phase 1 and 2 HC emissions on
the last test of the set. This is probably due to the HC sampling valve inadvertently being placed
in the "cold" sampling position (see discussion below).
Table 4-3. Percent Standard Deviation (%SD) for the Regulated Emissions.
Phase 1
Stratus
Taurus Set 1
Taurus Set 2
New Yorker Set 1
New Yorker Set 2
Phase 2
Stratus
Taurus Set 1
Taurus Set 2
New Yorker Set 1
New Yorker Set 2
Phase 3
Stratus
Taurus Set 1
Taurus Set 2
New Yorker Set 1
New Yorker Set 2
HC,% SD
5.48
3.78
4.21
22.21
8.68
31.52
0.93
1.39
35.59
4.55
49.09
3.14
1.67
4.99
7.82
CO, % SD
2.20
3.25
4.98
8.26
7.43
5.38
1.85
2.93
12.76
8.33
31.77
5.87
3.65
19.55
6.34
CO2,% SD
1.18
0.66
0.74
1.32
1.10
1.39
0.79
1.50
1.55
1.46
2.75
0.48
0.67
1.30
1.20
NOx, %SD
13.08
1.78
7.43
4.42
7.29
11.86
2.83
5.65
2.99
7.58
9.82
1.33
8.68
8.37
7.88
During the course of the Pilot Study, several changes were made to the sampling
schemes, which had a minor impact on the real-time regulated emissions data. These changes are
listed below:
1) Starting with run # 84020, time and date columns were added to the real-time data
files. These will become a permanent fixture of the real-time files.
2) On three runs, #84008, #84013, and #84023, both the sample and the background
FIDs measured diluted exhaust through a "cold" sample train due to sampling
valves inadvertently left open.
4-9
-------
3) On runs #84016 through #84022, the HC background line was disconnected from
the dilution tunnel in order to sample untreated room air during testing.
4) On run # 84015, the NOx span bottle was inadvertently sampled for the first 76
seconds of the test.
4.3 Continuous and Time-Integrated Gravimetric Mass Measurements
Chemical analysis of the time-integrated samples is currently in progress. Only data for
gravimetric mass are available at this time, reported here and compared to the continuous PM
mass measurements. The TOR organic and elemental carbon data will be available in mid-June
and organic speciation will be available in July 2004. Table 4-4 shows the PM2.5 gravimetric
mass analysis of the Teflon filters for all tests by UDC phase along with the corresponding
phase-averaged continuous mass concentrations.
Figure 4-1 shows the gravimetric mass concentrations for all tests for each of the three
vehicles (Stratus, Taurus and New Yorker) in chronological order. Tests prior to May 24 were
performed with the dilution air to the CVS heated to 47C and the sample train also maintained at
47±5C. Tests from May 24 -26 were performed with dilution air at ambient temperature and
without temperature control of the sampling train. No substantial difference due to temperature is
evident. Phase 1 consistently yields higher average mass concentrations than either Phases 2 or 3.
Phase 3 shows the most variability, probably due to the smaller amounts of mass collected.
Figure 4-2 shows the gravimetric filter mass loading for the daily tunnel blanks relative to the
combined total mass loadings for each test. Mass data for the tunnel blanks are adjusted for the
longer run time. Tunnel blanks are consistently small relative to Phase 1 and 2 concentrations.
There is an apparent decrease in the tunnel blanks for the lower temperature tests, and total mass
loadings are somewhat more consistent for the lower temperature tests.
Figures 4-3 through 4-5 compare the continuous mass data for the DustTrak versus the
DataRam nephelometer for the Dodge Stratus, Ford Taurus and the Chrysler New Yorker,
respectively. Figure 4-6 compares the average continuous mass and black carbon to the
corresponding filter mass concentrations. The photoacoustic black carbon data are also shown.
Nephelometer mass is much higher in the ambient temperature measurements (probably closer to
4-10
-------
Table 4-4. Gravimetric Mass and Averaged Continuous Data for All Tests, by
Phase
[Note: gravimetric mass has been corrected by media blank subtraction.]
mass cone uncer. DustTrakMass DataRamMass BlackCarbon
Date Run#
5/20 84003
5/20 84003
5/20 84003
5/20 84004
5/20 84005
5/20 84005
5/20 84005
5/20 84006
5/20 84006
5/20 84006
5/21 84007
5/21 84007
5/21 84007
5/21 84008
5/21 84008
5/21 84008
5/21 84009
5/21 84009
5/21 84009
5/21 84010
5/22 84012
5/22 84012
5/22 84012
5/22 84013
5/22 84013
5/22 84013
5/22 84014
5/23 84015
5/23 84015
5/23 84015
5/24 84016
5/24 84016
5/24 84016
5/24 84017
5/24 84017
5/24 84017
5/24 84018
5/25 84019
5/25 84019
5/25 84019
5/25 84020
5/25 84020
5/25 84020
5/25 84021
5/26 84022
5/26 84022
5/26 84022
5/26 84023
5/26 84023
5/26 84023
5/26 84024
plate
52083
52083
52083
blank
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
707why
707why
707why
52083
52083
52083
epa975
epa975
epa975
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
blank
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
blank
52083
52083
52083
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
blank
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
blank
EPA975
EPA975
EPA975
707WHY
707WHY
707WHY
blank
vehicle
Stratus
Stratus
Stratus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Yorker
Yorker
Yorker
Stratus
Stratus
Stratus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Yorker
Yorker
Yorker
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Yorker
Yorker
Yorker
Stratus
Stratus
Stratus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Yorker
Yorker
Yorker
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Yorker
Yorker
Yorker
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Yorker
Yorker
Yorker
PHASE
1
2
3
blank
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
blank
1
2
3
1
2
3
blank
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
blank
1
2
3
1
2
3
blank
1
2
3
1
2
3
blank
T(C)
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
ug/filter unc. (ug/m3) (ug/m3) _(ug/m3) _(ug/m3) _(ug/m3)
49
102
49
70
103
73
35
305
481
325
41
87
74
151
80
43
157
403
112
126
105
89
139
298
474
72
153
41
66
15
172
107
19
229
387
73
42
115
170
11
200
358
95
80
155
237
42
279
485
53
26
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
119
88
118
16
309
53
70
1118
432
1067
95
72
181
482
60
96
508
365
344
36
424
85
573
1003
429
201
41
92
48
-2
556
84
11
758
347
205
8
357
149
-18
654
320
283
19
490
207
92
936
439
166
3
29
12
29
3
43
9
26
120
45
114
25
10
28
57
9
24
59
38
44
5
56
12
69
107
45
32
5
24
8
19
64
11
19
83
37
32
2
45
17
19
73
34
39
3
56
22
19
100
45
28
1
22
15
11
5
118
38
25
246
141
56
19
11
15
146
45
31
208
305
94
4
114
32
42
456
336
106
#N/A
21
6
5
165
25
43
360
82
62
#N/A
372
31
83
487
97
86
7
390
37
29
830
280
110
1
13
9
4
2
34
20
11
116
238
28
10
7
8
45
21
13
94
171
45
2
204
21
25
908
249
91
#N/A
18
4
3
282
20
46
639
68
73
#N/A
898
100
78
2178
112
97
11
1335
37
61
3187
258
88
0
2
0
2
0
40
9
12
40
43
5
3
1
1
52
4
15
43
25
12
1
55
5
21
60
25
8
#N/A
6
0
1
80
5
18
59
9
6
#N/A
135
7
26
75
9
9
1
130
8
27
80
14
6
0
4-11
-------
1200 -
___ 1000 -
?r
| 800-
3 600-
s
Q.
400 -
200 -
• phs
• phc
Dphc
\se'\
\se2
ise3
WiMl
20- 21-
May May
Stra
n
=e
22-
May
tus
23-
May
JT
1
-ffl
20-
May
ft
-Is!
21-
May
R
fr
22-
May
Tau
ambient
24-
May
rus
1
1
25-
May
1
T.
26-
May
T
ll
f
I
J.
20-
May
T
^
I
£
21-
May
1
E
1
22-
May
Yor
ambient
T
±
1
^
24-
May
ker
I
I
25-
May
ft
i
26-
May
Figure 4-1. Mass Concentration as Determined by Gravimetric
Analysis of Teflon Filters for All Tests by Cycle Phase.
[Uncertainties are indicated by error bars. Tests prior to May 24 were performed with the sample
train maintained at 47C. Tests from May 24 -26 were performed w/out temperature control.]
4-12
-------
1000
Jr «no
c
? 600 -
IT)
CVJ
^ 400 -
CL
200
0 -
D phases
• phase2
D phasel
• blank/2
1
>s
CD
6
CN
—
JH_
>s
CD
5
CN
Strs
IH
>s
CD
5
CN
CN
atus
m
>s
CD
th
CN
E
>s
CD
6
CN
.^H
>s
CD
5
CN
W.
>s
CD
5
CN
CN
Tai
ambient
>s
CD
4
CN
jrus
• — |
>s
CD
LXS
CN
.
>s
CD
cl
CN
• 1
-
>s
CD
6
CN
_ ^m.
>s
CD
5
CN
-
^.
>s
CD
5
CN
CN
Yo
ambient
>s
CD
4
CN
-ker
-
i — .
^^m.
>s
CD
LXS
CN
n
>s
CD
cl
CN
2500
2000
- 1500
- 1000
500
- 0
Figure 4-2. PM2.5 Gravimetric Filter Mass for All Tests
[Daily tunnel blanks are indicated also, and have been adjusted for the longer run time.]
4-13
-------
D DustTrakMass_(ug/m3)
D DataRamMass_(ug/m3)
D BlackCarbon_(ug/m3)
DRI Continuous PM Summary: Vehicle 52083
Dodge Stratus
~ 20
n
E
01
3
O
c
V
u
c
o
0
15 --
10 --
5 --
Vehicle Designation
Figure 4-3. Continuous PM Mass Measurements, Dodge Stratus
4-14
-------
D DustTrakMass_(ug/m3)
D DataRamMass_(ug/m3)
D BlackCarbon_(ug/m3)
DRI Continuous PM Summary: Vehicle EPA975
Ford Taurus
01
3
o
0)
u
c
o
u
1DUU -
1400 -
1 nnn
onn
Ann
400 -
n -
47 C
I m~[ n-^ n | ^~l FLi n I I
1 •__ rfea-
AMBIENT
I
\
1
1 „_ rm.
m
\ -|
---
h
1 \~M— r-TI-i
,&',&'&'
Vehicle Designation
Figure 4-4. Continuous PM Mass Measurements, Ford Taurus
4-15
-------
D DustTrakMass_(ug/m3)
• DataRamMass_(ug/m3)
D BlackCarbon_(ug/m3)
ocrnn -,
r?
Ol
3
icentration
i-' r-
3 Ul C
3 O C
3 O C
crnn
n -
DRI Continuous PM Summary: Vehicle 707WHY
Chrysler New Yorker
47 C
1 EIU nL n_ 1 U-. 1 1. n»_ 1
ndl m
AMBIENT
[
i
\
I
| r
1
\
| f|
&'&'&'&'&'&' <&
r\V r\V r\V
Vehicle Designation
Figure 4-5. Continuous PM Mass Measurements, Chrysler New Yorker
4-16
-------
co
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
re
^^^^^^^B
1
1
\ i
~~\
\ !-.
• IL
" ,
* : ? ii
i :»: . •
i\ '• ^'.- J ! :
I
i
^
i
160
140
120
100
80
^)
60 m
CNCNCN
5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5
LOLr)Lr)
LOLr)Lr) 252525LOLr)Lr)
Figure 4-6. Comparison of Averaged Continuous Mass and Black Carbon to Corresponding Filter
Mass Concentrations for Each
4-17
-------
the filter values) than the 47 C data, possibly indicating reduced particle size for the 47 C data.
However, black carbon mass concentration from the PA is also higher for the measurements with
dilution air at ambient temperature. This finding is independent of particle size, so these
differences may reflect run-to-run variations in emission rates. When the tunnel is at 47C, the
nephelometer and photoacoustic instruments are at about 30C (not feasible to heat them to 47C),
so particle loss along the sample lines associated with the temperature gradient are possible. One
way to deal with this would be to educt a sample (with some dilution) from the dynamometer at
high temperature, and use the eduction dilution to quench the sample quickly.
Figures 4-7 and 4-8 show the cumulative QCM response for the three test vehicles. The
vertical axis shows accumulated mass, so the average concentration for the three cycles taken
together is the final mass divided by the total sampled volume (at 1 LPM flow rate, 29 minutes
sampling time, the total sample volume is about 1/34.5 cubic meters). The New Yorker
concentration should also be multiplied by a factor of 20, as this was the dilution ratio for this
vehicle. The QCM average mass concentrations for Phases 1-3 agree reasonably well with the
DRI filter sampler results for the first run (time weight average of Phase 1-3). (For example, the
New Yorker time weighted average for all phases was 655 ug/m3, while the QCM time weighted
average for the first run was about 628 ug/m3.) Run #84016 (New Yorker) and #84017 (Taurus)
were done with the dynamometer CVS dilution air at ambient temperature. These runs look
different than the other runs done at 47 Degrees C. However, note that the Taurus run #84012
(47 C) shows more decrease of mass during the hot soak than does the other run (#84016) done
at ambient conditions. This is a bit of a paradox, given that the elevated temperature would
likely make for less volatile aerosol to begin with.
A summary of the OCM results is shown in Table 4-5. Figures 4-9 through 4-11 show all
the OCM results in Kansas City and Ann Arbor.
It is too soon to draw any conclusions from these runs, given the variability. The QCM
average mass concentrations for the Pilot Study are being processed by EPA and will be
examined in greater detail relative to the other measurements in the final version of this report.
4-18
-------
4.500
4.000
3.500
3.000
2.500
u. 2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000 J
-0.500
o.too
Dodge Stratus
500.000
1000.000
1500.000
2000.000
2500.000
Time (sec)
3000.000
Figure 4-7. Cumulative QCM Response for the Dodge Stratus.
4-19
-------
Ford Taurus (EPA975)
10.000
-2.000
-500000 O.COO 500.000 1000.000 1500.000 2000.000 2500.000 3000.000
time (sec)
Figure 4-8. Cumulative QCM Response for the Ford Taurus.
4-20
-------
Table 4-5. Summary of QCM Results
Date
47DEG. C
5/20/2004
5/21/2004
5/22/2004
5/23/2004
47 DEC. C
5/20/2004
5/21/2004
5/22/2004
AMBIENT
5/24/2004
Test No.
KC Test 84003
KC Test 84007
KC Test 840 11
KC Test 840 15
KC Test 84005
KC Test 84008
KC Test 840 12
KC Test 840 16
Vehicle
STRATUS
STRATUS
STRATUS
STRATUS
FORD TAURUS
FORD TAURUS
FORD TAURUS
FORD TAURUS
Phase
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
Elapsed
Time
(sec)
309.5
1114.6
310.1
310.8
1114.0
309.174
310.0
1114.7
309.1
309.3
1115.7
309.6
309.6
1114.6
309.7
309.7
1120.0
303.0
309.9
1114.4
308.6
309.5
1114.4
Collected
Mass
ug
0.164
1.691
0.264
0.180
2.021
0.224
0.210
2.720
0.283
0.146
1.461
0.111
0.040
0.089
0.044
0.083
0.032
0.051
1.747
7.449
1.248
1.971
4.489
Sample
Flow
(Lpm)
0.986
0.987
0.990
0.969
0.969
0.973
0.973
0.968
0.969
0.958
0.970
0.970
1.042
1.048
1.055
0.960
0.960
0.962
0.970
0.970
0.964
0.980
0.980
Dilution
Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
10.9
10.9
10.8
9.9
9.9
9.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
QCM
Cone.
ug/m3
32.24
92.22
51.58
35.86
112.39
44.68
41.79
151.20
56.67
29.55
81.00
22.17
94.29
62.84
100.60
274.08
125.62
104.47
348.68
413.47
251.76
389.94
246.62
CVS
Volume
cu.ft.
2350.138
8890.3
2346.3
2363.852
8928.3
2364.2
2348.568
8879.3
2347.7
2342.480
8868.4
2338.0
2360.614
8926.3
2362.6
2364.414
8928.2
2364.4
2348.312
8869.4
2346.2
2514.441
9347.8
Distance
Travelec
mi.
1.18
8.64
1.20
1.18
8.63
1.19
1.19
8.65
1.19
1.18
8.64
1.19
1.20
8.64
1.19
1.19
8.63
1.20
1.19
8.65
1.19
1.17
8.62
Emissions
mg/mi.
1.825979592
2.685521665
2.856803133
2.029602319
3.292697374
2.514271198
2.331926544
4.396030538
3.172099067
1.663335699
2.353844783
1.230158617
Ave./Std.
5.271922657
1.838491768
5.640808758
15.42178759
3.679664008
5.84651719
19.52479458
12.00778436
14.08979991
Ave./Std.
23.66308173
7.573420292
Emissions
Composite
g/mi. (FTP)
0.002653192
0.00317347
0.004204292
0.002240496
0.003067863
0.002280978
0.004441776
0.012541285
N/A
0.000848354
N/A
4-21
-------
Date
5/25/2004
5/26/2004
47 DEC. C
5/20/2004
5/21/2004
5/22/2004
AMBIENT
5/24/2004
5/25/2004
5/26/2004
Test No.
KC Test 840 19
KC Test 84022
KC Test 84006
KC Test 84009
KC Test 840 13
KC Test 840 17
KC Test 84020
KC Test 84023
Vehicle
FORD TAURUS
FORD TAURUS
CHRYSLER NY
CHRYSLER NY
CHRYSLER NY
CHRYSLER NY
CHRYSLER NY
CHRYSLER NY
Phase
o
J
1
2
o
J
1
2
o
J
1
2
o
J
1
2
o
J
1
2
o
J
1
2
o
J
1
2
o
J
1
2
o
J
Elapsed
Time
(sec)
308.7
310.6
1115.1
309.9
310.0
1114.7
310.1
311.4
1114.1
311.4
309.4
1115.3
309.2
310.7
1113.7
309.7
309.6
1114.3
308.8
310.6
1114.0
308.1
313.3
1111.1
309.5
Collected
Mass
ug
1.373
1.468
8.058
1.562
2.038
6.720
1.212
0.084
0.726
0.058
0.042
0.482
0.041
0.075
0.857
0.029
0.095
0.839
0.102
0.106
0.722
0.037
0.128
0.617
0.088
Sample
Flow
(Lpm)
0.974
0.953
0.953
0.954
0.970
0.970
0.970
0.933
0.941
1.020
0.959
0.960
0.963
0.952
0.950
0.953
0.960
0.952
0.967
0.970
0.970
0.970
0.970
0.970
0.970
Dilution
Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
19.2
19.3
19.4
18.9
18.9
19.0
18.8
18.9
19.0
19.7
19.7
19.8
19.3
19.3
19.4
19.5
19.3
19.4
QCM
Cone.
ug/m3
274.05
297.48
454.86
317.14
406.70
372.90
241.74
333.72
802.49
212.50
160.41
510.83
157.14
286.73
917.30
111.92
377.84
936.67
405.35
406.90
772.98
143.91
492.44
664.58
341.22
CVS
Volume
cu.ft.
2505.3
2581.209
9574.7
2571.2
2568.635
9524.1
2553.8
2367.296
8854.0
2360.0
2356.807
8848.0
2355.9
2342.702
8792.1
2343.1
2497.896
9163.7
2481.4
2570.282
9454.2
2555.1
2549.899
9372.4
2538.3
Distance
Travelec
mi.
1.18
1.18
8.64
1.18
1.19
8.64
1.18
1.22
8.59
1.21
1.21
8.69
1.17
1.22
8.68
1.20
1.22
8.68
1.20
1.21
8.65
1.20
1.20
8.65
1.19
Emissions
mg/mi.
16.41106554
18.40019195
14.27982604
19.52089079
24.89911739
11.64269135
14.84781105
Ave./Std.
18.34328507
23.41204919
11.72843726
8.864481177
14.73353023
8.965567919
15.61094031
26.29779167
6.211601288
Ave./Std.
21.94380696
28.01427409
23.68682341
24.50897862
23.91608964
8.711827288
29.60364162
20.38355521
20.60441037
Emissions
Composite
g/mi. (FTP)
0.009011035
0.014852954
0.012551043
0.012138344
0.02231874
0.014035471
0.024346924
0.020233712
0.027392712
0.022895525
0.020882019
0.023723419
0.002942744
0.005462785
0.003333368
4-22
-------
KC QCM Concentrations
900 -
800 -
„ 700-
"5)
^ 600 -
_o
•g 500 -
o>
u
c
0 400 -
S
O
0 300-
200 -
100 -
Dphasel
• phase2
D phases
1
1
"rflrl M Hri-
20-May
21-May
Str;
22-May
jtus
23-May
I
20-May
4O-
1
=>-
IT
21-May
it
22-May
Tai
ambient
I „
—
24-May
rus
I
25-May
10-Feb
•
1
'
20-May
21-May
1
22-May
Yo
•
fmbient
24-May
ker
n
1
"
25-May
-
26-May
Vehicle/Date
Figure 4-9. Kansas City QCM Summary
4-23
-------
AA QCM Concentrations
1200 -
1000 -
CO
"3>
3
1 80°-
1
0>
| 600-
o
1
400 -
200 -
0 -
Dphasel
• phase2
D phases
rdl^n^^l -n--n_
6-Apr
7-Apr
8-Apr
21 -Apr
Stratus
22-Apr
27-Apr
28-Apr
u
20-Apr
21 -Apr
22-Apr
Taurus
-
h
27-Apr
rn
f
28-Apr
-
rb
20-Apr
r
1
21 -Apr
,
1
-
22-Apr 27-Apr
Yorker
28-Apr
Vehicle/Date
Figure 4-10. Ann Arbor QCM Summary
4-24
-------
1.400
1.200
1.000
0.000
0.600
0.400
0.200
500.000 0.000
-0.200
New Yorker (707WHY)
time (sec)
500.000 1000.000 1500.000 2000.000 2500.000 3000.000
Figure 4-11. Cumulative QCM Response for the Chrysler New Yorker
4-25
-------
4.4 SEMTECH Pre-Conditioning Runs
All three test vehicles were driven on a designated route which will be used in the full
program to precondition vehicles. Figure 4-12 shows the speed and acceleration plot for the
precondition and drive on the Dodge Stratus. The speed/acceleration profile for the drive is
shown in Figure 4-13.
4-26
-------
Speed Trace
52083 Preconditioning Cycle
CL
~a
CD
CD
Q_
CO
100 -
95 -
90 -
85 -
80 -
75 -
70 -
65 -
60 -
55 -
50 -
45 -
40 -
35 -
30 -
25 -
20 -
15 -
10 -
5 -
0 -
15
10
h -10
h -15 V
CD
O
O
- -20 <
- -30
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700
Time (sees)
precond.sas 18JUN04 08:53
Figure 4-12. Speed Trace for Preconditioning Run for the Dodge Stratus
4-27
-------
Speed — Acceleration Distribution
52083_Preconditioning Cycle
CO
_c
Q_
O
i^
_CD
CD
O
O
-10
Speed (mph)
0.01
0.20
precond.sas 18JUN04 08:53
0.05
1.00
0.10
2.00
Figure 4-13. Speed-Acceleration Distribution for the Preconditioning Run for the Dodge Stratus
4-28
-------
4.5 Emission Events as a Function of Vehicle Driving
Figure 4-14 shows the Bag 2 of a run on the Taurus from run number 84022. Figure 4-15
shows the contour plot of the region of vehicle operation where NOx emissions predominantly
occur. This data was generated from the BKI second-by-second data after the emissions were
time aligned with the speed. As shown in the plot, most emissions were at high speed and/or
high acceleration situations. These kind of data reductions can be used to model the relationship
between speed/acceleration and emissions can also be generated with time aligned PM data.
4-29
-------
Q_
c
o
D
i^
_CD
~CD
U
U
-10
Speed (mph)
0.01
0.20
0.02
0.50
0.05
1.00
0.10
2.00
Summ_84022.sas 18JUN04 09:04
Figure 4-14. Dynamometer Speed/Acceleration Profile for Run #84022
-------
Q_
D
^
CD
O
O
Speed (mph)
0.01
0.20
0.02
0.50
0.05
1.00
0.10
2.00
Summ_84022.sas 18JUN04 09:04
Figure 4-15. Dynamometer NOx Emission Generation Contour Plot for
Run #84022
-------
4.6 Composite LA92 Results from Dynamometer and SEMTECH
SEMTECH sampling was performed concurrently with all dynamometer testing. By-
phase and total composite emission rates as measured using each system (SEMTECH vs.
dynamometer) were then calculated and are presented in Table 4-6 below. Results in Table 4-6
are based on time-aligned test data to which the necessary corrections (humidity, dilution, flow)
have been applied.
For each system, phase-specific grams/mile emission rates were calculated by dividing
the total phase emissions by the distance the vehicle traveled during that phase. For all
calculations, mileage was that as measured by the front dynamometer rollers. Composite
emission rates for the entire run were calculated using the following formula:
C = 0.43
Poll + Pol2
DI + D2
+ 0.57
Pol2 + Pol3
D2 + D3
Where:
C = Composite emission rate for the run (grams/mile)
Poll = Total pollutant (HC, CO, CO2, or NOx) emissions for phase 1 (grams)
Pol2 = Total pollutant (HC, CO, CO2, or NOx) emissions for phase 2 (grams)
Pol3 = Total pollutant (HC, CO, CO2, or NOx) emissions for phase 3 (grams)
Dl = Phase 1 distance traveled (miles)
D2 = Phase 2 distance traveled (miles)
D3 = Phase 3 distance traveled (miles)
Comparison of phase-specific and total composite emission rates Table 4-6 below shows
a relatively good correlation between the two methods of measurement.
The BKI dynamometer numbers are based on speed and emissions time aligned second-
by-second data. These estimates are integrated values for each phase. The SEMTECH rates
have also been estimated by using speed and emissions time alignment methodology developed
by Sensors. Table 4-6 shows good correlation for CO2, CO, and NOx but not for HC. Although
EPA staff identified incorrect flow rate readings obtained by the SEMTECH unit, the data
presented in Table 4-6 is based on emission rate estimates with corrected flow rates. The data
from Table 4-6 is also graphically in Figure 4-16, which provides plots of BKI dynamometer
composite results vs. SEMTECH composite results. This again shows good correlation for CO2,
CO, and NOx but less of a correlation between SEMTECH and BKI dynamometer HC results.
4-32
-------
The data in Table 4-6 and Figure 4-16 is only based on testing conducted 5/20 through
5/24. As shown in Table 2-12 (Section 2.7), several testing problems occurred during this time
period that could strongly influence the accuracy of the SEMTECH readings (and consequently
the correlation between the two datasets). It is anticipated that analysis of additional SEMTECH
vs. dynamometer data (including analysis of data from testing conducted 5/25 and 5/26) will
show a better correlation between the two systems. The 5/25 and 5/26 test data is currently
undergoing SEMTECH flow meter bias corrections and will be included in future reporting.
The Phase 1 NOx reading for run ID 84015 (2004 Stratus tested 5/23/04) is unusually
high relative to other NOx readings for this vehicle (both for this run as well as for other runs).
Review of the second-by-second raw dynamometer data for this run shows NOx readings around
89.5 ppm for the first 60 seconds of testing. Subsequent readings then drop to under 1 ppm
(which is equivalent to PPM readings for other Stratus runs). Investigation into the cause of this
unusually high NOx reading should be performed to identify the root cause of this anomaly.
Table 4-7 provides a side-by-side comparison of SEMTECH vs. Dynamometer
composite results for each test, categorized by vehicle. The composite results shown in bold-
faced font indicate which system had higher emission measurement readings. Percentage
difference between the two systems (relative to the lower of the two readings) is also shown for
each run, and results with overall differences greater than 100% are highlighted in yellow. As
shown in Table 2-12, the runs with overall differences greater than 100% were performed when
SEMTECH HC readings were questionable due to calibration issues. For the New Yorker, all
SEMTECH HC readings were fairly consistent and were consistently higher than the BKI
dynamometer readings. For the Taurus, the SEMTECH HC reading for the first run (ID 84005)
was much lower than the SEMTECH HC readings for the last two runs (IDs 84008 and 84012).
BKI dynamometer HC readings were fairly consistent for all Taurus runs. This calls into
question the SEMTECH HC reading on the first Taurus run. Additional analysis of the
correlation of SEMTECH results vs. BKI dynamometer results will be performed.
4-33
-------
Table 4-6. Comparison of SEMTECH and Dynamometer Emission Measurements
Run ID
#
84003
84005
84006
84007
84008
84009
84011
84012
84013
Phase
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
HC (gm/mile)
SMTCH
0.29
0.03
0.01
0.04
1.84
1.09
1.55
1.16
7.46
2.59
2.92
2.87
0.34
0.04
0.03
0.06
2.48
3.02
5.14
3.14
7.21
2.38
3.32
2.70
0.84
0.05
0.03
0.09
7.59
3.01
5.24
3.40
8.22
3.20
3.06
3.46
BKI
0.55
0.04
0.02
0.06
5.30
2.29
3.78
2.55
5.65
1.00
2.08
1.32
0.56
0.04
0.03
0.06
4.94
2.20
3.50
2.44
5.43
1.01
2.33
1.33
0.76
0.04
0.03
0.08
5.50
2.25
3.80
2.53
5.75
1.27
2.09
1.56
CO (gm/mile)
SMTCH
2.84
0.45
0.27
0.56
40.71
21.16
29.71
22.78
38.03
23.07
20.32
23.67
3.03
0.40
0.47
0.54
35.86
19.77
24.99
20.97
35.11
25.27
31.70
26.23
3.05
0.50
0.43
0.63
39.16
20.44
25.78
21.78
33.53
31.85
23.70
31.38
BKI
3.11
0.35
0.16
0.48
37.93
18.27
26.78
19.89
36.31
11.53
17.24
13.26
3.18
0.31
0.34
0.46
34.50
17.62
23.34
18.90
31.40
12.40
27.05
14.40
3.35
0.40
0.25
0.54
36.76
17.98
22.83
19.29
30.07
15.55
19.93
16.62
CO2 (gm/mile)
SMTCH
641.24
368.84
459.08
390.13
694.39
422.06
606.90
449.12
736.63
792.01
670.50
780.48
653.71
385.06
577.51
412.31
669.51
405.60
595.41
432.56
739.66
749.42
656.03
742.58
673.42
404.68
585.94
431.19
683.17
401.73
593.60
429.58
761.78
747.03
652.28
741.27
BKI
654.38
379.46
439.90
398.48
684.07
418.80
582.03
443.99
700.09
491.26
618.32
511.39
665.12
392.18
552.43
417.43
673.00
412.24
576.67
437.27
691.33
475.33
600.76
495.18
700.45
428.10
574.40
452.39
681.67
411.96
577.03
437.36
715.54
477.02
603.48
498.39
NOx (gm/mile)
SMTCH
0.44
0.09
0.13
0.11
7.90
7.03
8.44
7.18
1.89
2.59
2.01
2.51
0.48
0.10
0.17
0.13
7.82
7.03
8.69
7.19
1.76
2.58
1.91
2.49
0.53
0.12
0.17
0.14
8.08
6.93
8.65
7.11
1.61
2.64
2.25
2.56
BKI
0.38
0.07
0.10
0.09
7.55
6.24
7.76
6.41
1.78
1.60
1.70
1.62
0.46
0.09
0.14
0.11
7.70
6.37
8.07
6.55
1.87
1.73
1.78
1.74
0.50
0.09
0.13
0.11
7.77
6.28
8.17
6.49
1.64
1.74
2.02
1.75
Distance
(miles)
1.17
8.63
1.42
11.22
1.20
8.62
1.19
11.01
1.22
8.58
1.21
11.01
1.18
8.61
1.19
10.99
1.19
8.62
1.20
11.00
1.21
8.67
1.17
11.05
1.19
8.63
1.19
11.01
1.19
8.63
1.19
11.01
1.22
8.67
1.20
11.08
4-34
-------
Run ID
#
84015
84016
84017
Phase
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
1
2
3
Comp
HC (gm/mile)
SMTCH
0.76
0.04
0.04
0.08
5.43
2.07
3.54
2.35
4.00
1.93
2.18
2.06
BKI
0.63
0.03
0.05
0.07
5.91
2.34
3.89
2.63
5.93
1.28
2.31
1.60
CO (gm/mile)
SMTCH
3.21
0.45
0.53
0.60
46.38
22.18
27.16
23.77
36.97
19.20
24.16
20.49
BKI
3.27
0.34
0.42
0.50
43.14
19.49
23.13
20.96
34.53
10.85
21.17
12.82
CO2 (gm/mile)
SMTCH
632.09
368.37
535.27
393.56
679.21
406.74
593.17
433.65
739.37
595.64
634.82
605.98
BKI
647.02
383.36
518.41
406.34
693.98
421.94
584.57
447.19
725.21
461.37
616.86
486.16
NOx (gm/mile)
SMTCH
0.47
0.08
0.12
0.10
7.90
6.89
8.54
7.05
1.80
2.02
2.21
2.02
BKI
2.33
0.08
0.12
0.19
7.82
6.38
8.22
6.58
1.75
1.47
1.90
1.51
Distance
(miles)
1.18
8.63
1.19
11.00
1.17
8.60
1.18
10.96
1.22
8.66
1.20
11.08
4-35
-------
0)
1
HC
(grams/mile)
R n
7 n
R n -
5 0 -
4 n
T n -
2 0 -
1 n
n n .
-
«• »*
*
/
* s #
•*.r»*
»'
k
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
SEMTECH
CO2
(grams/mile)
800
ynn
snn
V
c
>
Q
500 -
400 -
300
*. I*
+> '
***
^
* \ *
A*"
•^
300 400 500 600 700 800
SEMTECH
50
40
o
I
30
20 -
10
CO
(grams/mile)
0 10 20 30 40 50
SEMTECH
o
5x
Q
NOx
(grams/mile)
10
Q
8
7
6
5 _
4
3
o
1
0 -
. %
^^
«
• . *
A*»
k*
0123456789 10
SEMTECH
Figure 4-16. Plots of Dynamometer Measurements vs. SEMTECH
Measurements
4-36
-------
Table 4-7. By-Vehicle Comparison SEMTECH vs. Dynamometer Composite
Results
Run
ID#
HC (gm/mile)
SMTCH
BKI
% diff
CO (gm/mile)
SMTCH| BKI
% diff
CO2 (gm/mile)
SMTCH| BKI
% diff
NOx (gm/mile)
SMTCH
BKI
% diff
New Yorker
84006
84009
84013
84017
2.873
2.699
3.457
2.056
1.324
1.331
1.564
1.601
117
103
121
28
23.67
26.23
31.38
20.49
13.26
14.40
16.62
12.82
79
82
89
60
780.5
742.6
741.3
606.0
511.4
495.2
498.4
486.2
53
50
49
25
2.513
2.493
2.559
2.023
1.620
1.745
1.753
1.514
55
43
46
34
Stratus
84003
84007
84011
84015
0.042
0.058
0.092
0.076
0.064
0.062
0.080
0.066
52
6
14
16
0.558
0.538
0.627
0.598
0.479
0.461
0.545
0.496
16
17
15
21
390.1
412.3
431.2
393.6
398.5
417.4
452.4
406.3
2
1
5
3
0.109
0.125
0.145
0.102
0.087
0.109
0.111
0.195
25
14
31
92
Taurus
84005
84008
84012
84016
1.162
3.139
3.402
2.347
2.551
2.435
2.525
2.630
120
29
35
12
22.78
20.97
21.78
23.77
19.89
18.90
19.29
20.96
15
11
13
13
449.1
432.6
429.6
433.7
444.0
437.3
437.4
447.2
1
1
2
3
7.176
7.186
7.109
7.053
6.411
6.555
6.487
6.583
12
10
10
7
4-37
-------
5.0 Issues to be Resolved
CO2 emission results were higher on all three correlation vehicles at the Kansas City test
site than were found in Ann Arbor (by about 5-10 % for Phases 1 and 3, and 10-20 % for Phase
2). Discussions have focused primarily on emission differences as a result of using different
dynamometer types (water brake, twin roll Clayton in Kansas City versus an electric, 48" roll
Horiba in Ann Arbor). Discussions have yielded several plausible explanations for these
differences, which are summarized below.
It was observed in the field that operating at speeds above 60 mph may adversely affect
the Clayton dynamometer loading, resulting in subsequent higher loading until speeds were
reduced to about 20-30 mph. It was also noted that under continuous operation without breaking
the 60 mph barrier, the load held fairly constantly. It was also noted that the greater differences
in CO2 emissions seen in Phase 2, relative to Phase 1 and Phase 3 differences, with the Clayton
dynamometer would be consistent with abnormally higher loading on the Clayton associated
with speeds above 60 mph. Possible reasons for higher loads under the circumstances described
include:
1) Possible foaming of 50/50 glycol/water mixture.
2) Setting of dead bands at 50 mph.
3) Innate characteristic of the Clayton PAU.
4) Leaking load/unload valves.
As the load has been observed to first go higher and then return to original values after
low speed operation, leaking of the load/unload valves seems a remote possibility (if they were
leaking, the PAU would either only load or only unload all the time, not back and forth).
Action items for BKI include reducing the glycol content of the cooling/loading fluid and
performing dead band adjustments (preferably at -60 mph). Coastdowns at a variety of speeds
up to 65-70 mph should also be performed (with speed and torque being recorded) both before
and after adjustments to determine the effect of the adjustments.
Additionally, coastdowns performed at Ann Arbor and in Kansas City should be
compared. This would include the old and new coastdowns from Kansas City and the new (65-35
mph) coastdowns from Ann Arbor.
5-1
-------
Driver differences could also be responsible for at least part of the CO2 differences. We
therefore also propose to conduct two additional LA92s on the Taurus, using two different
drivers.
In later discussions, it was pointed out that the set-up of the Clayton dynamometer
located in Kansas City is a bit different than the set-up of similar dynamometers in Ann Arbor. In
particular, speed measurement is taken from the front (or loaded) rolls in Kansas City, but taken
from the rear (free wheeling) rolls in Ann Arbor. In general, speeds measured on the loaded rolls
will be less than speeds measured on the rear rolls due to tire slippage on the loaded rolls,
particularly with the aggressive nature of the LA92 driving cycle. As a result, when speed is
measured from the front rolls, the test vehicle will be operated at a higher speed to compensate
for the tire slippage, which could very well account for the differences in observed emission
rates. This seems to be the most plausible explanation. Accordingly, the set up in Kansas City
will be changed to measure rear roll speed instead of front roll speed.
Lastly, it is unclear whether the inertia of the rear rolls (-155 Ibs.) has been accounted for
in the flywheel system of the Clayton dynamometer used in Kansas City. Available literature
will be searched to see if this determination can be made. Emissions tests will be repeated with
the Taurus both before and after the changes are made, as discussed above. The BKI team is
planning to conduct some additional testing in late June in Kansas City. In addition, in Ann
Arbor coast down are being conducted on a clayton dynamometer. It is also anticipated that
some additional emissions tests may also be conducted in Ann Arbor on the Clayton
dynamometer.
The correlation between measurements of regulated pollutants made by the SEMTECH
vs. those made by the BKI dynamometer requires investigation. Since the SEMTECH testing
performed between 5/20 and 5/24 is suspect due to calibration issues, it is recommended that
investigation be primarily focused on testing conducted subsequent to 5/24. Investigation into
the cause of the high BKI dynamometer NOx readings for phase 1 of Run ID 84015 will also be
performed.
Some issues have been identified regarding the correlation between particulate mass
emissions as measured by the QCM vs. estimates using gravimetric analysis. Additional
investigation is required to help resolve these correlation issues.
5-2
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix CC
Scope of Work
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
ORDER FOR SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PAGE °F PAGES
IMPORTANT: Mark all packaaes and papers with contract and/or order numbers.
1 .DATE OF ORDER 2. CONTRACT NO. (If any)
GS-10F-0036K
3. ORDER NO. 4.REQUISITION/REFERENCE NO.
1104 PR-CI-04-10377
5. ISSUING OFFICE (Address correspondence to)
Environmental Protection Agency
7. TO:
a. NAME OF CONTRACTOR
EASTERN RESEARCH GROUP INC
b. COMPANY NAME
c. STREET ADDRESS
1 10 HARTWELL AVENUE
d.CITY e. STATE f. ZIPCODE
Lexington MA 02421
9. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
See Attached
6. SHIP TO:
a. NAME OF CONSIGNEE
KATHLEEN A. WALSH, TOPO
b. STREET ADDRESS
2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD
c. CITY d. STATE B. ZIPCODE
ANN ARBOR Ml 48105
f. SHIP VIA
8. TYPE OF ORDER
[ ] a. PURCHASE
REFERENCE YOUR:
Please furnish the following on the terms
and conditions specified on both sides of
this order and on the attached sheet. If
any, including delivery as indicated.
M b.TASK -- Except for billing
instructions on the reverse, this task
order is subject to instructions
contained on this side only of this form
and is issued subject to the terms and
contitions of the above-numbered
contract.
10. REQUISITIONING OFFICE
Same as Block 6
11. BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION (Check appropriate box(es))
n a SIUIAI I rxi h nTHFRTHAM SIUIAI I
n H wniuiFM n\A/KiFn
12. F.O.B. POINT
Same as Block 6
13. PLACE OF
a. INSPECTION
|b. ACCEPTANCE
14. GOVERNMENT B/L NO.
15. DELIVER TO F.O.B. POINT
ON OR BEFORE (Date)
16. DISCOUNT TERMS
N/A
17. SCHEDULE (See reverse for Rejections)
ITEM NO.
(a)
SEE BILLING
INSTRUCTION
S
ON
REVERSE
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES
(b)
See Attached
All Base CLINs as set forth in Attachment 7 are
ordered at time of award.
18. SHIPPING POINT 19. GROSS SHIPPING WEIGHT
QUANTITY
ORDERED
(c)
UNIT
(d)
UNIT
PRICE
(e)
20. INVOICE NO.
21. MAIL INVOICE TO:
a. NAME
b. STREET ADDRESS (or P.O. Box)
c. CITY d. STATE e. ZIPCODE
AMOUNT
(f)
$543,223.96
QUANTITY
ACCEPTED
(g)
17(h). TOT.
^ (Com.
pages)
. 17(i).
^ GRAND
^ TOTAL
23. NAME (Typed)
22 AMElcfBYT||°aF^ ^ See Page 2 DAVID H. PLAGGE
TITLE: CONTRACTING/ORDERING OFFICER
NSN 7540-01-152-8083
PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE
OPTIONAL FORM 347 (REV. 6/95)
Prescribed by GSA/FAR 48 CFR 53.213(e)
-------
Task Order Signature Sheet
CONTRACTOR
EASTERN RESEARCH GROUP INC
By:
Date Signed
Title:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
By:
Date Signed
Title: Contracting Officer
Page: 2
-------
Characterizing Exhaust Emissions from Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles in the
Kansas City Metropolitan Area
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Summary Information
Title: Characterizing Exhaust Emissions from Light Duty
Gasoline Vehicles in the Kansas City Metropolitan
Area
Period of Performance: From: Effective of Task Order
To: 08/15/05
Award Date:
Total Funding:
$543,223.96
Accounting/Appropriation Data
BFYS Appr.# Org
Program
Element
Site/ Cost
Project Org
Funding Breakout
Acct.Info Funding Category
FY2003 - H30385 Cost Ceiling
Total:
FY2003 - H30421 Cost Ceiling
Total:
FY2003 - U2C172 Cost Ceiling
Total:
Amount
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
$255,000.00
$255,000.00
$88,223.96
$88,223.96
Procurement Management Roles
TASK ORDER PROJECT OFFICER:
U.S. E.P.A.
Attn: KATHLEEN A. WALSH
2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD
ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
Mail Code:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
ALTERNATE TASK ORDER PROJECT OFFICER:
U.S. E.P.A.
Attn: RICHARD W. BALDAUF
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
RTP, NC 27711
Mail Code:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
Page: 3
-------
Characterizing Exhaust Emissions from Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles in the
Kansas City Metropolitan Area
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
ALTERNATE TASK ORDER PROJECT OFFICER:
U.S. E.P.A.
Attn: CARL R. FULPER
2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD
ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
Mail Code:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
Attachments
Attachment Name
Applicable EPA Clauses
Performance Work Statement
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Task Order Line Items
Incentive Plan
Task Order Totals
Category POP Amount
Cost Ceiling Base Pd. $3,894,463.84
Page: 4
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
COMPLIANCE WITH EPA POLICIES FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (EPAAR 1552.211-79)
(OCT 2000)
(a) Definition. Information Resources Management (IRM) is defined as any planning,
budgeting, organizing, directing, training, promoting, controlling, and managing
activities associated with the burden, collection, creation, use and dissemination of
information. IRM includes both information itself, and the management of information and
related resources such as personnel, eguipment, funds, and technology. Examples of these
services include but are not limited to the following:
(1) The acguisition, creation, or modification of a computer program or automated
data base for delivery to EPA or use by EPA or contractors operating EPA programs.
(2) The analysis of reguirements for, study of the feasibility of, evaluation of
alternatives for, or design and development of a computer program or automated data base
for use by EPA or contractors operating EPA programs.
(3) Services that provide EPA personnel access to or use of computer or word
processing eguipment, software, or related services.
(4) Services that provide EPA personnel access to or use of: Data communications;
electronic messaging services or capabilities; electronic bulletin boards, or other forms
of electronic information dissemination; electronic record-keeping; or any other automated
information services.
(b) General. The Contractor shall perform any IRM related work under this contract in
accordance with the IRM policies, standards and procedures set forth in this clause and
noted below. Upon receipt of a work reguest (i.e. delivery order or work assignment), the
Contractor shall check this listing of directives (see paragraph (d) for electronic
access) . The applicable directives for performance of the work reguest are those in
effect on the date of issuance of the work reguest.
(1) IRM Policies, Standards and Procedures. The 2100 Series (2100-2199) of the
Agency's Directive System contains the majority of the Agency's IRM policies, standards
and procedures.
(2) Groundwater Program IRM Reguirement. A contractor performing any work related
to collecting Groundwater data; or developing or enhancing data bases containing
Groundwater guality data shall comply with EPA Order 7500.1A - Minimum Set of Data
Elements for Groundwater.
(3) EPA Computing and Telecommunications Services. The Enterprise Technology
Services Division (ETSD) Operational Directives Manual contains procedural information
about the operation of the Agency's computing and telecommunications services.
Contractors performing work for the Agency's National Computer Center or those who are
developing systems which will be
operating on the Agency's national platforms must comply with procedures established in
the Manual. (This document may be found at:
http://basin.rtpnc.epa.gov:9876/etsd/directives.nsf.)
(c) Printed Documents. Documents listed in (b)(1) and (b)(2) may be obtained from:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Administration
Facilities Management and Services Division
Distribution Section
Mail Code: 3204
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Phone: (202) 260-5797
(d) Electronic Access. Electronic access. A complete listing, including full text, of
documents included in the 2100 Series of the Agency's Directive System is maintained on
the EPA Public Access Server on the Internet at http://epa.aov/docs/irmpoli8/.
Attachment 1 - Page: 1
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE (EP 52.246-100) (APR 1984)
(a) The Contracting Officer or the duly authorized representative will perform
inspection and acceptance of materials and services to be provided.
(b) For the purposes of this clause, the Project Officer is the authorized
representative of the Contracting Officer.
(c) Inspection and acceptance will be performed at:
U.S. EPA NVFEL
2565 Plymouth Rd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (EP 52.212-140) (APR 1984)
The period of performance of this contract shall be from AWARD DATE through August 15,
2005 inclusive of all reguired reports.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION REPRESENTATIVES (EP 52.242-100) (AUG 1984)
Project Officer(s) for this contract:
Project Officer:
Kitty Walsh
US EPA NVFEL, Stop ASD
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor MI 48105
Telephone: (734) 214-4228
Fax: (734) 214-4816
Alternate Project Officer:
Carl Fulper
US EPA NVFEL, Stop ASD
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor MI 48105
Telephone: (734) 214-4400
Fax: (734) 214-4816
Alternate Project Officer:
Rich Baldauf - Stop MD-E205-04
109 T.W. Alexander Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Telephone: (919) 541-4386
Fax: (919) 541-0960
Contract Specialist(s) responsible for administering this contract:
Matt Growney
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati OH 45268
Telephone (513)487-2029
Fax: (513) 487-2107
Administrative Contracting Officer:
Attachment 1 - Page: 2
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
David Plagge
26 W. Martin Luther King Drive
Cincinnati OH 45268
Telephone (513)487-2022
Fax: (513) 487-2107
ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (EPAAR 1552.209-71) (MAY 1994) ALTERNATE I (MAY 1994)
(a) The Contractor warrants that, to the best of the Contractor's knowledge and belief,
there are no relevant facts or circumstances which could give rise to an organizational
conflict of interest, as defined in FAR Subpart 9.5, or that the Contractor has disclosed
all such relevant information.
(b) Prior to commencement of any work, the Contractor agrees to notify the Contracting
Officer immediately that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, no actual or potential
conflict of interest exists or to identify to the Contracting Officer any actual or
potential conflict of interest the firm may have. In emergency situations, however, work
may begin but notification shall be made within five (5) working days.
(c) The Contractor agrees that if an actual or potential organizational conflict of
interest is identified during performance, the Contractor will immediately make a full
disclosure in writing to the Contracting Officer. This disclosure shall include a
description of actions which the Contractor has taken or proposes to take, after
consultation with the Contracting Officer, to avoid, mitigate, or neutralize the actual or
potential conflict of interest. The Contractor shall continue performance until notified
by the Contracting Officer of any contrary action to be taken.
(d) Remedies - The EPA may terminate this contract for convenience, in whole or in part,
if it deems such termination necessary to avoid an organizational conflict of interest.
If the Contractor was aware of a potential organizational conflict of interest prior to
award or discovered an actual or potential conflict after award and did not disclose it or
misrepresented relevant information to the Contracting Officer, the Government may
terminate the contract for default, debar the Contractor from Government contracting, or
pursue such other remedies as may be permitted by law or this contract.
(e) The Contractor agrees to insert in each subcontract or consultant agreement placed
hereunder provisions which shall conform substantially to the language of this clause,
including this paragraph, unless otherwise authorized by the Contracting Officer.
NOTIFICATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST REGARDING PERSONNEL (EPAAR 1552.209-73) (MAY 1994)
(a) In addition to the requirements of the contract clause entitled "Organizational
Conflicts of Interest," the following provisions with regard to employee personnel
performing under this contract shall apply until the earlier of the following two dates:
the termination date of the affected employee(s) or the expiration date of the contract.
(b) The Contractor agrees to notify immediately the EPA Project Officer and the
Contracting Officer of (1) any actual or potential personal conflict of interest with
regard to any of its employees working on or having access to information regarding this
contract, or (2) any such conflicts concerning subcontractor employees or consultants
working on or having access to information regarding this contract, when such conflicts
have been reported to the Contractor. A personal conflict of interest is defined as a
relationship of an employee, subcontractor employee, or consultant with an entity that may
impair the objectivity of the employee, subcontractor employee, or consultant in
performing the contract work.
(c) The Contractor agrees to notify each Project Officer and Contracting Officer prior
to incurring costs for that employee's work when an employee may have a personal conflict
of interest. In the event that the personal conflict of interest does not become known
until after performance on the contract begins, the Contractor shall immediately notify
the Contracting Officer of the personal conflict of interest. The Contractor shall
continue performance of this contract until notified by the Contracting Officer of the
appropriate action to be taken.
Attachment 1 - Page: 3
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
(d) The Contractor agrees to insert in any subcontract or consultant agreement placed
hereunder, except for subcontracts or consultant agreements for well drilling, fence
erecting, plumbing, utility hookups, security guard services, or electrical services,
provisions which shall conform substantially to the language of this clause, including
this paragraph (d), unless otherwise authorized by the Contracting Officer.
SCREENING BUSINESS INFORMATION FOR CLAIMS OF CONFIDENTIALITY (EPAAR 1552.235-70) (APR
1984)
(a) Whenever collecting information under this contract, the Contractor agrees to comply
with the following reguirements:
(1) If the Contractor collects information from public sources, such as books,
reports, journals, periodicals, public records, or other sources that are available to the
public without restriction, the Contractor shall submit a list of these sources to the
appropriate program office at the time the information is initially submitted to EPA. The
Contractor shall identify the information according to source.
(2) If the Contractor collects information from a State or local Government or from
a Federal agency, the Contractor shall submit a list of these sources to the appropriate
program office at the time the information is initially submitted to EPA. The Contractor
shall identify the information according to source.
(3) If the Contractor collects information directly from a business or from a source
that represents a business or businesses, such as a trade association:
(i) Before asking for the information, the Contractor shall identify itself,
explain that it is performing contractual work for the Environmental Protection Agency,
identify the information that it is seeking to collect, explain what will be done with the
information, and give the following notice:
(A) You may, if you desire, assert a business confidentiality claim covering part
or all of the information. If you do assert a claim, the information will be disclosed by
EPA only to the extent, and by means of the procedures, set forth in 40 CFR Part 2,
Subpart B.
(B) If no such claim is made at the time this information is received by the
Contractor, it may be made available to the public by the Environmental Protection Agency
without further notice to you.
(C) The Contractor shall, in accordance with FAR Part 9, execute a written
agreement regarding the limitations of the use of this information and forward a copy of
the agreement to the Contracting Officer.
(ii) Upon receiving the information, the Contractor shall make a written
notation that the notice set out above was given to the source, by whom, in what form, and
on what date.
(iii) At the time the Contractor initially submits the information to the
appropriate program office, the Contractor shall submit a list of these sources, identify
the information according to source, and indicate whether the source made any
confidentiality claim and the nature and extent of the claim.
(b) The Contractor shall keep all information collected from nonpublic sources
confidential in accordance with the clause in this contract entitled "Treatment of
Confidential Business Information" as if it had been furnished to the Contractor by EPA.
(c) The Contractor agrees to obtain the written consent of the Contracting Officer,
after a written determination by the appropriate program office, prior to entering into
any subcontract that will reguire the subcontractor to collect information. The
Contractor agrees to include this clause, including this paragraph (c), and the clause
entitled "Treatment of Confidential Business Information" in all subcontracts awarded
pursuant to this contract that reguire the subcontractor to collect information.
Attachment 1 - Page: 4
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
TREATMENT OF CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (EPAAR 1552.235-71) (APR 1984)
(a) The Contracting Officer, after a written determination by the appropriate program
office, may disclose confidential business information (CBI) to the Contractor necessary
to carry out the work reguired under this contract. The Contractor agrees to use the CBI
only under the following conditions:
(1) The Contractor and Contractor's employees shall: (i) use the CBI only for the
purposes of carrying out the work reguired by the contract; (ii) not disclose the
information to anyone other than properly cleared EPA employees without the prior written
approval of the Assistant General Counsel for Contracts and Information Law; and (iii)
return to the Contracting Officer all copies of the information, and any abstracts or
excerpts therefrom, upon reguest by the Contracting Officer, whenever the information is
no longer reguired by the Contractor for the performance of the work reguired by the
contract, or upon completion of the contract.
(2) The Contractor shall obtain a written agreement to honor the above limitations
from each of the Contractor's employees who will have access to the information before the
employee is allowed access.
(3) The Contractor agrees that these contract conditions concerning the use and
disclosure of CBI are included for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, both EPA
and any affected businesses having a proprietary interest in the information.
(4) The Contractor shall not use any CBI supplied by EPA or obtained during
performance hereunder to compete with any business to which the CBI relates.
(b) The Contractor agrees to obtain the written consent of the CO, after a written
determination by the appropriate program office, prior to entering into any subcontract
that will involve the disclosure of CBI by the Contractor to the subcontractor. The
Contractor agrees to include this clause, including this paragraph (b), in all
subcontracts awarded pursuant to this contract that reguire the furnishing of CBI to the
subcontractor.
RELEASE OF CONTRACTOR CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (EPAAR 1552.235-79) (APR 1996)
(a) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may find it necessary to release
information submitted by the Contractor either in response to this solicitation or
pursuant to the provisions of this contract, to individuals not employed by EPA. Business
information that is ordinarily entitled to confidential treatment under existing Agency
regulations (40 C.F.R. Part 2) may be included in the information released to these
individuals. Accordingly, by submission of this proposal or signature on this contract or
other contracts, the Contractor hereby consents to a limited release of its confidential
business information (CBI).
(b) Possible circumstances where the Agency may release the Contractor's CBI include,
but are not limited to the following:
(1) To other Agency contractors tasked with assisting the Agency in the recovery of
Federal funds expended pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9607, as amended, (CERCLA or Superfund);
(2) To the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and contractors employed by DOJ for use
in advising the Agency and representing the Agency in procedures for the recovery of
Superfund expenditures;
(3) To parties liable, or potentially liable, for costs under CERCLA Sec. 107 (42
U.S.C. Sec. 9607), et al, and their insurers (Potentially Responsible Parties) for
purposes of facilitating settlement or litigation of claims against such parties;
(4) To other Agency contractors who, for purposes of performing the work reguired
under the respective contracts, reguire access to information the Agency obtained under
the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg.); the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33
U.S.C.1251 et seg.); the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seg.); the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136 et seg.); the Resource
Attachment 1 - Page: 5
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.); the Toxic Substances Control Act
(15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.); or the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.);
(5) To other Aqency contractors tasked with assistinq the Aqency in handlinq and
processinq information and documents in the administration of Aqency contracts, such as
providinq both preaward and post award audit support and specialized technical support to
the Aqency's technical evaluation panels;
(6) To employees of qrantees workinq at EPA under the Senior Environmental
Employment (SEE) Proqram;
(7) To Speaker of the House, President of the Senate, or Chairman of a Committee or
Subcommittee;
(8) To entities such as the General Accountinq Office, boards of contract appeals,
and the Courts in the resolution of solicitation or contract protests and disputes;
(9) To Aqency contractor employees enqaqed in information systems analysis,
development, operation, and maintenance, includinq performinq data processinq and
manaqement functions for the Aqency; and
(10) Pursuant to a court order or court-supervised aqreement.
(c) The Aqency recoqnizes an obliqation to protect the contractor from competitive harm
that may result from the release of such information to a competitor. (See also the
clauses in this document entitled "Screeninq Business Information for Claims of
Confidentiality" and "Treatment of Confidential Business Information.") Except where
otherwise provided by law, the Aqency will permit the release of CBI under subparaqraphs
(1), (3), (4), (5), (6), or (9) only pursuant to a confidentiality aqreement.
(d) With respect to contractors, 1552.235-71 will be used as the confidentiality
aqreement. With respect to Potentially Responsible Parties, such confidentiality
aqreements may permit further disclosure to other entities where necessary to further
settlement or litiqation of claims under CERCLA. Such entities include, but are not
limited to accountinq firms and technical experts able to analyze the information,
provided that they also aqree to be bound by an appropriate confidentiality aqreement.
(e) This clause does not authorize the Aqency to release the Contractor's CBI to the
public pursuant to a request filed under the Freedom of Information Act.
(f) The Contractor aqrees to include this clause, includinq this paraqraph (f), in all
subcontracts at all levels awarded pursuant to this contract that require the furnishinq
of confidential business information by the subcontractor.
KEY PERSONNEL (EPAAR 1552.237-72) (APR 1984)
(a) The Contractor shall assiqn to this contract the followinq key personnel:
PROJECT MANAGER - Sandeep Kishan
(b) Durinq the first ninety (90) calendar days of performance, the Contractor shall make
no substitutions of key personnel unless the substitution is necessitated by illness,
death, or termination of employment. The Contractor shall notify the Contractinq Officer
within 15 calendar days after the occurrence of any of these events and provide the
information required by paraqraph (c) below. After the initial ninety (90) calendar day
period, the Contractor shall submit the information required by paraqraph (c) to the
Contractinq Officer at least 15 calendar days prior to makinq any permanent substitutions.
(c) The Contractor shall provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances
necessitatinq the proposed substitutions, complete resumes for the proposed substitutes,
and any additional information requested by the Contractinq Officer. Proposed substitutes
should have comparable qualifications to those of the persons beinq replaced. The
Contractinq Officer will notify the Contractor within 15 calendar days after receipt of
Attachment 1 - Page: 6
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
all required information of the decision on substitutions. This clause will be modified
to reflect any approved changes of key personnel.
ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION (EPAAR 1552.209-70) (APR 1984)
(a) The prospective Contractor certifies, to the best of its
knowledge and belief, that it is not aware of any information
bearing on the existence of any potential organizational conflict
of interest. If the prospective Contractor cannot so certify, it
shall provide a disclosure statement in its proposal which
describes all relevant information concerning any past, present,
or planned interests bearing on whether it (including its chief
executives and directors, or any proposed consultant or
subcontractor) may have a potential organizational conflict of
interest.
(b) Prospective Contractors should refer to FAR Subpart 9.5 and
EPAAR Part 1509 for policies and procedures for avoiding,
neutralizing, or mitigating organizational conflicts of interest.
(c) If the Contracting Officer determines that a potential
conflict exists, the prospective Contractor shall not receive an
award unless the conflict can be avoided or otherwise resolved
through the inclusion of a special contract clause or other
appropriate means. The terms of any special clause are subject
to negotiation.
CONSIDERATION AND PAYMENT—ITEMIZED FIXED PRICES (EP 52.216-170) (APR 1984)
The fixed price of this contract is $543,223.96 (without incentives). Payment will be
made upon delivery and acceptance of required items as follows:
Base Net 30 Days After Completion and Acceptance
Option 1 Net 30 Days After Completion and Acceptance
Option 2 Net 30 Days After Completion and Acceptance
Option 3 Net 30 Days After Completion and Acceptance
Option 4 Net 30 Days After Completion and Acceptance
Option 5 Net 30 Days After Completion and Acceptance
HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT (GOVERNMENT SPECIFICATION) (FAR 52.246-11) (MAR
2001)
The Contractor shall comply with the higher-level quality standard selected below.
Title Numbering" Date Tailoring"
[•] Specifications and ANSI/ASQC E4 1994 See below
Guidelines for Quality
Systems for Environ
mental Data Collection
and Environmental
Technology Programs
Attachment 1 - Page: 7
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
As authorized by FAR 52.246-11, the higher-level quality standard ANSI/ASQC E4 is
tailored as follows:
The solicitation and contract require the offerer/contractor to demonstrate conformance
to ANSI/ASQC E4 by submitting the quality documentation described below.
In addition, after award of the contract, the Contractor shall revise, when applicable,
quality documentation submitted before award to address specific comments provided by EPA
and submit the revised documentation to the Contracting Officer's Representative.
After award of the contract, the Contractor shall also implement all quality
documentation approved by the Government.
A. Pre-award Documentation: The offerer must submit the following quality system
documentation as a separate and identifiable part of its technical proposal: (CO, select
one or more)
[X]
Documentation
Quality Management Plan
[ ] Joint Quality Management
Plan/Quality Assurance
Project Plan for the
contract
[X] Programmatic Quality
Assurance Project Plan
for the entire program
(contract)
Specifications
EPA Requirements for Quality Management Plans
(OA/R-2) [dated 03/20/01]
EPA Requirements for Quality
Management Plans (OA/R-2) [dated
03/20/01] and EPA Requirements for
Quality Assurance Project Plans
(QA/R) [dated 03/20/01]
EPA Requirements for Quality
Assurance Project Plans (QA/R-5)
[dated 03/20/01]
[ ] Other Equivalent:
This documentation will be prepared in accordance with the specifications identified
above. Work involving environmental data generation or use shall not commence until the
Government has approved this documentation and incorporated it into the contract.
B. Post-award Documentation: The Contractor shall submit the following quality system
documentation to the Contracting Officer's Representative at the time frames identified
below: (CO, select one or more)
Documentation
Specification
Due After
Quality Management Plan
EPA Requirements for
Quality Management Plans
(OA/R-2) [dated 03/20/01]
_Award of
contract
[ ] Joint Quality Management
Plan/Quality Assurance
Project Plan for the
contract
EPA Requirements for
Quality Management Plans
(QA/R-2) [dated 03/20/01]
and EPA Requirements for
_ Quality Assurance Project
Plans (QA/R-5) [dated
03/20/02]
Award of
contract
Attachment 1 - Page:
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
[ ] Quality Assurance
Project Plan for the
contract
EPA Requirements for
Quality Assurance Project
Plans (QA/R-5 [dated
03/20/01]
Award of
contract
[ ] Programmatic Quality
Assurance Project Plan
for the entire program
(contract)
EPA Requirements for
Quality Assurance Project
Plans (OA/R-5 [dated
03/20/01]
Award of
contract
[X] Quality Assurance
Project Plan for each
applicable project
EPA Requirements for Exercise of
Quality Assurance Project Option
Plans (QA/R-5 [dated for each
03/20/01] task order
[ ] Project-specific
supplement to
Programmatic Quality
Assurance Project Plan
for each applicable
project.
EPA Requirements for
Quality Assurance Project
Plans (QA/R-5 [dated
03/20/01]
Issuance of
statement of
work for the
project
[ ] Other Eguivalent:
[ ] award of contract
[ ] issuance
of statement
of work for
the project
This documentation will be prepared in accordance with the specifications identified
above.
The Government will review and return the guality documentation, with comments, and
indicating approval or disapproval. If necessary, the contractor shall revise the
documentation to address all comments and shall submit the revised documentation to the
government for approval.
The Contractor shall not commence work involving environmental data generation or use
until the Government has approved the guality documentation.
(Note: Statement of work includes statements of work to perform projects under work
assignments, task orders, delivery orders, etc.)
SUBMISSION OF INVOICES (EPAAR 1552.232-70) (JUN 1996) ALTERNATE I (JUN 1996) DEVIATION
In order to be considered properly submitted, an invoice or reguest for contract
financing payment must meet the following contract reguirements in addition to the
reguirements of FAR 32.905:
(a) Unless otherwise specified in the contract, an invoice or reguest for contract
financing payment shall be submitted as an original and five copies. The Contractor shall
submit the invoice or reguest for contract financing payment to the following
offices/individuals designated in the contract: the original to the Accounting Operations
Office shown in Block 21 on the cover of the contract; two copies to the Project Officer
(the Project Officer may direct one of these copies to a separate address); and one copy
to the Contracting Officer.
(b) The Contractor shall prepare its invoice or reguest for contract financing payment
on the prescribed Government forms. Standard Forms Number 1034, Public Voucher for
Attachment 1 - Page: 9
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Purchases and Services other than Personal, shall be used by contractors to show the
amount claimed for reimbursement. Standard Form 1035, Public Voucher for Purchases and
Services other than Personal - Continuation Sheet, shall be used to furnish the necessary
supporting detail or additional information required by the Contracting Officer. The
Contractor may submit self-designed forms which contain the required information.
(c)(1) The Contractor shall prepare a contract level invoice or request for contract
financing payment in accordance with the invoice preparation instructions identified as a
separate attachment in Section J of the contract. If contract work is authorized by
individual delivery orders, the invoice or request for contract financing payment shall
also include a summary of the current and cumulative amounts claimed by cost element for
each delivery order and for the contract total, as well as any supporting data for each
delivery order as identified in the instructions.
(2) The invoice or request for contract financing payment that employs a fixed rate
feature shall include current and cumulative charges by contract labor category and by
other major cost elements such as travel, equipment, and other direct costs. For current
costs, each cost element shall include the appropriate supporting schedules identified in
the invoice preparation instructions.
(3) The charges for subcontracts shall be further detailed in a supporting schedule
showing the major cost elements for each subcontract. The degree of detail for any
subcontract exceeding $5,000 is to be the same as that set forth under (c)(2).
(4) The charges for consultants shall be further detailed in the supporting schedule
showing the major cost elements of each consultant. For current costs, each major cost
element of the consulting agreement shall also include the supporting schedule identified
in the invoice preparation instructions.
(d) Invoices or requests for contract financing payment must clearly indicate the period
of performance for which payment is requested. Separate invoices or requests for contract
financing payment are required for charges applicable to the basic contract and each
option period.
(e)(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of the clause of this contract at FAR 52.216-7,
Allowable Cost and Payment, invoices or requests for contract financing payment shall be
submitted once per month unless there has been a demonstrated need and Contracting Officer
approval for more frequent billings. When submitted on a monthly basis, the period
covered by invoices or requests for contractor financing payments shall be the same as the
period for monthly progress reports required under this contract.
(2) If the Contracting Officer allows submissions more frequently than monthly, one
submittal each month shall have the same ending period of performance as the monthly
progress report.
(3) Where cumulative amounts on the monthly progress report differ from the
aggregate amounts claimed in the invoice(s) or request(s) for contract financing payments
covering the same period, the contractor shall provide a reconciliation of the difference
as part of the payment request.
OPTION FOR INCREASED QUANTITY--FIXED-PRICE CONTRACT (EP 52.217-982) (APR 1984)
(a) The Government may increase the quantity of work called for under this contract as
follows:
Total Delivery
Option Description Price Date
1 Phase 2 Round 1 Vehicle Testing $1.452,282.59 See PWS
2 Phase 2 Round 1 Speciation Toxic Analysis $50,923.54 See PWS
Attachment 1 - Page: 10
-------
Applicable EPA Clauses
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
3 Phase 3 Round 2 Vehicle Testing $1.600,871.64 See PWS
4 Phase 3 Round 2 Speciation Toxic Analysis $55,161.01 See PWS
5 Final Report / Analysis $148,139.49 See PWS
Please see the Task Order Line Item Attachment for breakout of individual line items
prices. The Delivery Schedule s set forth in the Performance Work Statement for the
Task Order.
(b) The Contracting Officer may exercise an option by written notice to the
Contractor within the following time periods:
Option Time Period for Exercising Option
1 Up to Twelve (12) Months After Award
2 Up to Twelve (12) Months After Award
3 Up to Twelve (12) Months After Award
4 Up to Twelve (12) Months After Award
5 Up to Twelve (12) Months After Award
Attachment 1 - Page: 11
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Characterizing Exhaust Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles
in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Coordinating Research Council (CRC), the
U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the State and Territorial Air Pollution
Program Administrators/Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (STAPPA/ALAPCO) propose to
conduct a program to evaluate exhaust emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles. The proposed program
consists of measuring particulate matter (PM) and other components in exhaust emissions of 480 randomly
selected, light-duty vehicles in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. A sampling plan has been developed that
will allow for the determination of the distribution of paniculate matter (PM) and other emissions in the sampled
fleet as well as the identification of the percent of high emitters. Data obtained from this program will be used to
evaluate and update existing and future mobile source emission models (MOBILE6 and MOVES), evaluate
existing emission inventories and assess the representativeness of previous PM emissions studies.
2.0 BACKGROUND
Mobile sources significantly contribute to ambient concentrations of air contaminants, including
parti culate matter. Recent source apportionment studies for PM10 and PM2 5 indicate that mobile sources can
be responsible for over half of the ambient PM measured in an urban area (Motallebi, 1999; Magliano, 1998;
Dzubay et al., 1988). Some of these source apportionment studies have attempted to differentiate between
contributions from gasoline and diesel combustion. Studies conducted in Denver and Phoenix indicated that
gasoline combustion from mobile sources contributed more to ambient PM than diesel combustion (Lawson
and Smith, 1998; Ramadan, 2000). However, studies conducted in Los Angeles and the San Joaquin Valley in
California indicate that diesel combustion contributed more than gasoline combustion to ambient PM (Schauer
et al., 1996; Schauer and Cass, 2000). Existing emission inventories developed by the EPA also suggest diesel
vehicles contribute more than gasoline vehicles to ambient PM concentrations.
Exhaust emissions of parti culate matter from gasoline-powered motor vehicles have changed
significantly over the past 25 years (Cadle et al., 1999). These changes have resulted from reformulation of
fuels, the wide application of exhaust gas treatment, and changes in engine design and operation. Because of
these evolving tailpipe emissions, along with the wide variability of emissions between vehicles of the same class
(Hildemann et al., 1991; Cadle et al., 1997; Sagebiel et al., 1997; Yanowitz et al., 2000), well-defined average
emissions profiles for the major classes of motor vehicles have not been established.
The majority of exhaust PM emitted by motor vehicles is in the PM2 5 size range. Kleeman et al.,
(2000) have shown that gasoline and diesel fueled vehicles produce particles that are mostly less than 2.0 |im in
diameter. Cadle et al., (1999) found that 91% of PM emitted by in-use gasoline vehicles in the Denver area
was in the PM2 5 size range, which increased to 97% for "smokers" (i.e., light-duty vehicles with visible smoke
emitted from their tailpipes). Durbin et al.,(1999) found that 92% of the PM was smaller than 2.5 |im for
smokers. The mass median diameter of the PM emitted by the gasoline vehicles sampled by Cadle et al.,
(1999) was about 0.12 |im, which increased to 0.18 |im for smokers. Corresponding average emissions rates
of PM2 5 were 38 mg/mi for normal emitting gasoline vehicles and 222 mg/mi for gasoline smokers.
Emissions from smokers are comparable to those from diesel vehicles. Thus, older and poorly
maintained gasoline vehicles could be significant sources of PM2 5 (Sagebiel et al., 1997; Lawson and Smith,
1998). Durbin et al. (1999) point out that although smokers constitute only 1.1 to 1.7% of the light-duty fleet in
the South Coast Air Quality Management District in California, they contribute roughly 20% of the total PM
emissions from the light-duty fleet. Motor vehicles that are high emitters of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide
can be high emitters of PM (Sagebiel et al., 1997; Cadle et al., 1997). National distributions of smokers and
high emitting vehicles for PM have not been evaluated.
A major obstacle in previous emissions testing studies has been the recruitment of vehicles. Most
studies have not incorporated random sampling in the study design due to the high non-participation rate and
the high incentive costs associated with random sampling of vehicles. Therefore, few studies, and no studies
evaluating light-duty PM emissions, can be used to represent the distribution of vehicle emissions in a large
Attachment 2 - Page: 1
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
population.
The EPA, CRC, NREL, DOT, and the STAPPA/ALAPCO and EPA Emission Inventory
Improvement Program (EIIP), hereafter referred to as the Project "Sponsors", plan to conduct a program to
characterize exhaust emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles. Data obtained from this program will be used
to evaluate and update existing and future mobile source emission models (MOBILE6 and MOVES) and
evaluate existing emission inventories. For the purpose of this RFP, the term "Contractor" shall include the
primary contractor and any subcontractors awarded the project task order.
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Sponsors propose to conduct exhaust emissions testing on 480 light-duty, gasoline vehicles in the
Kansas City Metropolitan Area (KCMA). The goal of the project is to determine the distribution of PM
emissions in a randomly selected fleet as well as identify the percent of high emitters in the fleet. The project
will also characterize gaseous and PM toxics exhaust emissions from a portion of these light-duty vehicles.
Data obtained from this program will be used to evaluate and update emission models, evaluate existing
emission inventories, and assess the representativeness of previous emissions studies.
EPA through its Project Officer will represent the Sponsors during this test program. The contractor
will address and forward all issues and technical assistance through EPA Project Officer. The Project Officer
will disseminate this information to the Sponsors to get the best advice on how to proceed. The information
from the contractor can be sent to the Sponsors and the EPA Project Officer at the same time but only the
Project Officer can give technical .guidance to the contractor. The EPA Project Officer will assume the
responsibility that all Sponsors are provided the information in a timely fashion. The Sponsors will assure that
they or their representative give timely advice back to the Project Officer in order to keep delays to a minimum.
The EPA Project Officer, or any representatives of the project sponsors, will conduct audits of all
facets of the project. The contractor may be notified prior to an audit; however, the sponsors reserve the right
to conduct audits without notification.
The project description has been divided into three main sections: Vehicle Recruitment and Pilot
Studies, Vehicle Testing, and Sample Analysis. The contractor shall ensure integration of all three work areas.
Specific tasks associated with each of these work areas are listed in Section 5.
3.1 Vehicle Recruitment
Vehicle recruitment activities will be designed to identify the distribution of PM emissions from gasoline
vehicles in order to better evaluate the contribution of gasoline high emitters to ambient PM concentrations.
Vehicles will be recruited from the Kansas City Metropolitan Area (KCMA) (see Figure 1). The sample
size estimation was derived from data based on a previous study (CRC E-24) in which EPA estimated
the initial sample size, estimated the effective sample size, and then allocated the effective sample
among strata.(see Appendix B) For the purposes of this task order the KCMA consists, at a minimum, of
the counties of Wyandotte and Johnson in Kansas; and Jackson, Cass, Clay, and Platte in Missouri. In order
to increase the likelihood of obtaining a representative sample population and a high participation rate, the
contractor will obtain a cohort, (existing or newly developed), from which vehicles will be randomly recruited
for emissions testing. The cohort shall include a socioeconomically diverse group of citizens that represent the
demographics of the KCMA. Additionally, the contractor shall compare the characteristics of the vehicles
owned by the cohort to those of the Kansas City and national fleets to assess the representativeness of the
cohort population. The contractor shall include an assessment of the effect of non-respondents to the cohort
development program. In addition, the contractor shall document and evaluate non-respondents to the
emissions testing program to ensure non-biased sample collection. The following information will be required
for this assessment:
• Geo-demographic data for the cohort including vehicle ownership, approximate residence location, and
socioeconomic status.
• Vehicle characteristics for the cohort group including year, make, model, and mileage of all owned
Attachment 2 - Page: 2
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
vehicles.
• Comparisons of select volunteer vehicle's oxides of nitrogen (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), and
hydrocarbon (HC) emissions to other vehicle emissions in the Kansas City fleet.
• Detailed on-road vehicle fleet characteristics for the KCMA.
• Vehicle registration database for the KCMA which includes both vehicle characteristics listed above
and vehicle ownership (name and address).
Attachment 2 - Page: 3
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
1. Man of the Kansas Citv Metropolitan Area.
Vehicles will be recruited from the KCMA for two rounds of emissions testing: Round 1 during the
summer, 2003 and Round 2 during the winter, 2003/2004. Two sources will be considered as sample
frames for test vehicles.
Cohort Sample: The contractor shall draw a random sample of 400 vehicles from the socio-
demographically representative cohort chosen by the contractor for the purpose of this project. The
contractor shall also draw a random sample of 80 vehicles from non-respondents to the cohort
(described in Section 3.1.3). The sample shall be stratified by vehicle age and class with target
recruitment numbers as shown in Table 1. EPA does not possess any cohort data for Kansas
City or any other locality. However, EPA is aware of data being collected through a DOT
Congestion, Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) grant administered through the Mid- America
Regional Council (MARC) in Kansas City. The mention of this data does not constitute a
recommendation to use this data set. In addition, there might be other sources of data
available in the region. (Note: Specific guidelines have not been established on what
constitutes a "diverse" population. In general, the contractor shall ensure that multiple
ethnicities and socioeconomic classes are included in the project. The contractor shall also
ensure the demographic data is obtained for all respondents.)
Attachment 2 - Page: 4
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Registration Sample: The Sponsors recognize that a demographically representative cohort group
may not possess a sufficient mix of vehicles, or the vehicles may not be representative of the general
fleet. The contractor shall provide the EPA representative with the vehicle registration database for the
KCMA. The EPA representative shall randomly select 400 vehicles from this database (vehicles
from the cohort) stratified by vehicle age and class with target recruitment numbers as shown in Table
1. The contractor shall also draw a random sample of 80 vehicles from non-respondents to the cohort
(described in Section 3.1.3). The contractor shall obtain socio-demographic data on all vehicle owners
chosen in this sample frame if this sample frame is used for recruitment. (Note: EPA has not made
prior arrangements with the States representing Kansas City for vehicle registration data.
The contractor should contact MARC and the State's Department of Motor Vehicles to
arrange for this data. EPA and Contractors shall consider all vehicle owner data acquired as
confidential with proper safe guards to ensure its access is restricted. This personal data will
be destroyed after the test program has ended).
3.1.1 Sample Representativeness Assessment.
The contractor shall determine the representativeness of the cohort sample for use in vehicle
recruitment. The contractor shall compare the characteristics of the cohort fleet, by make and model year, to
the Kansas City area fleet and the national fleet. The contractor shall also compare vehicle exhaust emissions of
NOx, HCs, and CO for select cohort vehicles and Kansas City fleet vehicles using new or previously collected
remote sensing data (RSD). Existing RSD could be used for assessing sample representativeness if
applicable. (Note: PM RSD measurements are not an acceptable method for comparing emissions
from RSD response and non-response vehicles. RSD data for gaseous compounds does not always
correlate well with PM emissions. In addition, PM RSD techniques are not well proven.) Second-
by-second chassis dynamometer emissions data from the Unified Cycle may be compared against remote
sensing data collected from the Kansas City area fleet as one approach. Recommended standard remote
sensing data collection protocols can be found at www.crcao.com (see E-23 Interim Report). The selected
approach must be justified in detail to ensure representativeness of Kansas City area fleet remote sensing data
to the general vehicle population and subsequent comparison of this data to the study test fleet including
appropriate weighting of the data used in this assessment. The contractor shall also conduct a double blind
comparison between the proposed sample obtained using the cohort sample frame and the proposed sample
using the registration sample frame to ensure representativeness of the vehicles recruited for the program.
3.1.2 Vehicle Selection.
The contractor shall be responsible for documenting and contacting all owners of vehicles chosen for
emissions testing. The contractor shall have the capability of multilingual recruitment (English and Spanish at a
minimum) to ensure that a majority of the KCMA population can participate in the program.
If the cohort sample is deemed representative, this database will be used for vehicle recruitment.
Otherwise, the registration sample will be used by the contractor for recruitment. All vehicles in the sample
frame shall be binned into a sample stratum. Vehicles shall be randomly selected from each stratum, so that all
vehicles in the stratum have an equal probability of selection. (This means that all vehicles in the cohort
sample will be assigned to a stratum based on year and type of vehicle and then vehicles within each
stratum will be randomly selected.) The total number of tests to be performed for the program is shown in
Table 2.
Table 1. Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum to Achieve Data Precision Goals (includes positive
respondents and non-respondents).
Stratum (h) Vehicle Class
1 Truck
2 Truck
3 Truck
Age Class
Pre 1980
1980-1990
1991-1995
Sample size (nh)1
50
100
70
Attachment 2 - Page: 5
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
1996 and newer
Pre 1980
1980 - 1990
1991-1995
1996 and newer
40
40
50
80
50
480
Table 2. Estimated Number of Vehicles Recruited and Test Performed
Different Vehicles Tests
Round 1
Positive Respondents from Cohort 170 170
Replicate Vehicle Tests 0 15
Non-respondent from Cohort" 80 80
Weekly calibration vehicle testb 0 12
Total 250 277
Round 2
Positive Respondents from Cohort 230 230
Non-respondent from Cohort" 0 0
Replicate Vehicle Tests 0 10
Repeat Vehicles from Round lb 25 25
Weekly calibration vehicle testb 0 12
Total 255 277
3 see Section 3.1.3 for description of this activity.
b see Section 3.2.3 for description of this activity.
Total vehicles includes non-response assessment.
3.1.3 Non-Response Assessment.
As part of the recruitment process, the contractor shall randomly select eighty (80) people who did not
positively respond to the initial request to participate in the cohort. These owner's vehicles will be recruited to
the program to assess any potential bias in results from the recruitment of volunteers to the study. A list of non-
respondent criteria will be developed with approval from the EPA Project Officer after consulting with the
Sponsors. As shown in Table 3, the number of vehicles to target in each stratum for the non-response analysis
shall be proportional to the vehicles recruited for the total population. The contractor shall propose criteria
to determining methods that achieve a high participation rate for non-respondents which might
include different incentive packages for different cohort stratum. The contractor can propose a
different criteria for what constitutes a non-respondent but shall provide documentation supporting its
approach.
Table 3. Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum for Non-Respondent Testing
Stratum (h) Vehicle Class Age Class Sample size (nh)1
Attachment 2 - Page: 6
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
1 Truck
2 Truck
3 Truck
4 Truck
5 Car
6 Car
7 Car
8 Car
Total
Pre 1980
1980-1990
1991-1995
1996 and newer
Pre 1980
1980-1990
1991-1995
1996 and newer
8
16
12
7
7
8
14
8
80
1 Number of randomly selected vehicles tested for the non-response assessment.
3.1.4 Participation Incentives
Incentives will be required for study participants. At a minimum, participants will require the use of a
rental vehicle during testing of their vehicle. Other likely incentives include cash, free gasoline, free repairs, and
free cleanup of participant vehicles. Since the vehicles will likely be randomly chosen from the cohort, incentive
requirements may be less than for previous testing programs. However, incentives must be adequate to ensure
the lowest possible rejection rate from study participants. Incentive packages will be reviewed and refined
in a pilot study program as described in section 3.1.5 in order to assure a high participation rate and
reduce both contractor time and cost. If a vehicle is rejected for some reason when the vehicle is
inspected (see section 3.2.1), the potential participant should be compensated for their time and
trouble. The contractor shall propose a rejection participation package if this situation occurs.
From previous studies, the Sponsors have developed an outline on the cost of incentives that might be
used by the contractor to reduce rejection rates. The contractor can propose other incentives packages that
they feel might improve the response rate for the program and/or reduce contractor's time in managing the
incentives program.
A separate emission and activity program involving portable emission measurement system (PEMS) or
portable activity measurement system (PAMS) will need additional incentives for selected participants whose
vehicles would have this device. See Section 3.2.4 for details.
The contractor will propose a budget for achieving these goals outlined in this section.
Monthly progress reports itemizing incentive expenditures and details on those expenditures shall be
provided to the Contracting Officer and the Project Officer. The Contractor shall notify the Project
Officer when 75% of the incentive funds have been expended.
Table 4. Incentives
Tvne of Incentives
Cash
Full Tank of Gasoline
Rental Vehicle
Car Wash (possible)
PEMS / PAMS Use
Total
Incentive Cost
$200 (if using a rental vehicle)
$275 (for not using a rental vehicle)
$25
$75 (for uo to three davs)
$10
$50
$360
Attachment 2 - Page: 7
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
3.1.5 Vehicle Recruitment Pilot Study
The contractor shall conduct a pilot study to evaluate recruitment methods and incentive packages to
identify the adequacy of the proposed recruitment process in achieving a high response rate from vehicle
owners (positive respondents and non-respondents) and to assure proper flow of vehicles for emission testing.
The contractor shall propose methods and evaluate methods from this pilot study. The contractor
shall include in their proposal methods that will be used for contacting participants that include: mode
of contact (phone calling, letter) , number and frequency of contacts, and incentives. The pilot vehicle
recruitment study should indicate cost savings in reduced contractor's time burden and savings for recruiting
vehicles. Vehicles do not have to be recruited during this pilot study but focus groups could be used
as one way to evaluate recruitment methods and incentive packages for different geodemographic
groups.
3.1.6 Data Management.
The contractor shall maintain all data records, and make all databases used in the assessment accessible to
the EPA Project Officer and to the Sponsors. The contractor shall document all statistical methods used in
determining the representativeness of the vehicles chosen for the sample frame. The contractor shall also
maintain a list of all vehicle owners contacted for recruitment to the study. The contractor shall list the person
contacted, socio-demographic information associated with each person contacted, the response, and the
incentives required, if the response is positive. To identify all people contacted for participation in the study, the
contractor shall use a confidential, unique identification code to protect the privacy of all individuals.
3.2 Vehicle Testing
All vehicle testing will occur outdoors under ambient conditions. The contractor shall select a suitable
location that provides security and accessibility for all project participants. The general testing site area needed
to conduct the program is approximately 100 ft x 200 ft for equipment (transportable dynamometer and
trailers) plus room for vehicles. The contractor shall provide cover to ensure that all equipment and vehicles are
protected from the elements during participation in the study. The contractor shall be responsible for identifying
and procuring a suitable location for conducting the emissions tests and covering the costs of shipping the
portable dynamometer to and from the testing location in Kansas City (dynamometer is located in
Research Triangle Park Area, NC). The contractor shall be responsible for providing the following
electrical power at the site needed to power the sampling equipment, and the dynamometer:
60 amp, 3 phase, 480 v.
200 amp., 1 phase, 240 v.
The contractor and subcontractor(s) are required to have insurance that covers vehicles procured
from the public that might be damaged while in their possession. All vehicles whether they are
insured or uninsured will be tested. (None, if any, uninsured vehicle should occur since State's
require vehicle insurance.)
The contractor may need to provide vehicles for the duration of the study: a full-sized vehicle for moving
heavy equipment and a vehicle for transporting people.
3.2.1 Vehicle Inspection, Maintenance, and Conditioning
All vehicles shall be inspected upon arrival to the testing facility. To lessen the chance of an owner
complaining that the car was scratched or damaged, a video recording is recommended The major
components of the inspection are engine condition (engine noises, whether it "knocks" or other "noises"), tire
condition, brake condition, and integrity of the exhaust system.
All appropriately equipped vehicles shall have their OBD system scanned. The scan results shall be
reported along with the type of OBD systems found on the vehicle, such as OBDI or OBDII. Any defects or
deficiencies in the vehicle condition that pose a danger to testing personnel will be repaired by the
contractor. Any defects or deficiencies in the vehicle condition that will not affect exhaust emissions
Attachment 2 - Page:
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
will not be repaired by the contractor since the goal of the project is not to reject any vehicle due to
operating condition. All repairs shall be documented. If a vehicle cannot be repaired to a condition that does
not pose a safety risk to project participants, the vehicle must be rejected. Detailed information on all vehicles
must be obtained and recorded for the overall vehicle study even if a vehicle is rejected
Portable Emission Measurement Systems (PEMS) or Portable Activity Measurement Systems
(PAMS) devices might be used to further characterize these rejected vehicles.
Initial vehicle data will be collected and recorded on a computerized vehicle information form. Recorded
information is not limited to but will include date and time of vehicle procurement, date and time of vehicle
testing, test number, vehicle license plate number, make, model, model year, odometer, engine family number,
vehicle identification number (VIM), evaporative emission number, engine displacement, number of cylinders,
emission controls, catalyst type, vehicle registration status, and fuel and oil information. Condition of the motor
oil (e.g. clean or new vs. used/dirty) will be reported. A visual and odor inspection of the exhaust will also be
noted to determine in advance whether or not a vehicle might be a low or high PM emitter or smoker. All
information will be documented for each vehicle brought to the testing facility, regardless of whether the vehicle
is tested.
After the vehicle has passed inspection, it shall be conditioned for testing. Conditioning will occur by
driving the vehicle on a route pre-established by the contractor in the vicinity of the testing location. The
conditioning route must contain multiple high speed accelerations, a minimum often minutes of continuous high
speed operation, and low speed operation and idling just prior to the completion of the conditioning route.
After conditioning, the vehicle shall soak overnight prior to emissions testing on the dynamometer. Portable
activity measurement system (PAMS) might be used to compare conditioning differences between vehicles.
Vehicles will be observed for visible smoke during vehicle processing and after the initial dynamometer test.
A test will be developed by the contractor for smoke observation as part of the vehicle conditioning process.
Based on observations during this test, vehicles will be characterized in the smoker category (measured by
color), if appropriate.
Attachment 2 - Page: 9
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Figure 1a -Vehicle Inspection Flow Diagram
Recruit Vehicle and Brought to Test Site or
Rcked Up at Vehicle Owner's Home
Visual Inspection (video tape vehicle and
sign waivers etc.)
Exchange Loaner vehicle, if required.
Check vehicle parameters and store into
equipjn.dbf software
Is the vehicle
exhaust system
okay?
as the vehicle
enough fuel for
Check vehicle safety (e.g. tires, fluid levels
brakes, engine, and exhaust system)
s the engine
okay?
(major oil/gasoline
leaks, etc.)
Are the tres safe?
Prep Vehicle for
Emission Testing
Are the fluid levels
Are the brakes okay?
Attachment 2 - Page: 10
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Attachment 2 - Page: 11
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
3.2.2 Vehicle Testing Procedures and Equipment
Vehicles will be brought to the testing facility randomly for testing by the contractor. No predetermined
order for testing should be incorporated. However, if the vehicle pre-inspection does indicate that a vehicle
might be a high emitter (due to smoke, smell, etc.), that vehicle shall be tested last in the day. A calibration (or
control) vehicle will be used weekly to test the dynamometer system. The contractor shall report the control
vehicle weekly results before beginning the next week of vehicle tests. As part of the Quality Assurance
Project Plan (QAPP) and Quality Management Plan (QMP), the contractor shall develop guidelines
or standards for vehicle inspections and testing of vehicles.
3.2.2.1 Dynamometer Testing
Vehicle exhaust emissions testing will occur using the EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD)
transportable chassis dynamometer (refer to Section 3.2).
The contractor shall provide a cost break down for both options listed below. EPA will decide during
proposal review which option to select.
Scenario A - EPA's ORD provides the dynamometer testing equipment, the contractor operates and
is responsible for all costs.
Scenario B - EPA's ORD provides the dynamometer testing equipment and the dynamometer's
operation occurs under a separate contract and the contractor needs to coordinate with the contractor
operating the dynamometer.
The information in this section is for the contractor's information only. However, the contractor awarded this
task order must ensure that data collected through either option is integrated into the program.
The EPA dynamometer simulates driving on a Clayton Model CTE-50-0 chassis dynamometer. The
dynamometer is capable of simulating a continuous spectrum of loads from three to 50 hp @ 50 mph and
inertias from 1750 to 3000 pounds in 250-pound increments and 3000 to 5500 pounds in 500 pound
increments. Cooling fluid for the dynamometer's water brake power absorption unit consists of a 50/50 mixture
of water and glycol. The fluid is recirculated and cooled by a self-contained pumping and cooling system. Test
inertia and hp settings for the dynamometer will be determined from computerized EPA I/M lookup tables and
recorded on the vehicle test form.
Vehicles will be operated over the LA92 Unified Driving Cycle (shown in Figure 2). The LA92 cycle will
consist of a cold start Phase 1 (first 310 seconds), a stabilized Phase 2 (311 - 1427 seconds), a 600-second
engine off soak, and a warm start Phase 3 (repeat of Phase 1 of LA92), PM filter collection will occur
separately for phase 1, phase 2, and phase 3.
A positive displacement pump-constant volume sampling (PDP-CVS) system will be used to quantitatively
dilute exhaust gas from the vehicle operating on the dynamometer. The PDP-CVS system is constructed of an
8-inch diameter stainless steel dilution tunnel and a SutorBilt Model GAELAPA (6-LP) PDF operating at 500
CFM. Dilution air is treated with a charcoal bed (for HC stabilization) followed by a HEPA filter (99.97%
DOP filter efficiency) to remove particles prior to mixing with vehicle exhaust.
During transient testing, the dilution tunnel temperature shall be kept constant at 47±5°C to prevent loss of
volatile PM components from high temperature portions of the driving test cycle and because of the dominance
of volatile PM components from low temperature portions of the driving test cycle. Maintenance of a constant
temperature will also enable PM instrument sample temperature controls to operate more effectively.
Attachment 2 - Page: 12
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
LA92Drvrig Schedule
-Vehic
co
CO in CN (35 CD CO O
t- m (35 CN CD O •<*•
OOOOOOO5O5(35OO
Figure 2. LA92 Driving Cycle.
As part of the tunnel conditioning process, the CVS and tunnel dilution air heater shall be turned on at least
ten (10) hours prior to engine start and run to purge the exhaust transfer line and dilution tunnel. Pilot testing
results may indicate that less than ten hours is sufficient. Pumps at the analytical bench shall be run at least one
(1) hour prior to engine start to purge all sample lines. The CVS, tunnel heater and sample pumps shall be kept
running throughout the day and will not be shut down until the conclusion of testing for that day. Testing shall
not be started until the temperature in the dilution tunnel has reached a stable value (no increase in temperature
over a 3 minute period).
Within two (2) minutes of the start of the initial test of the day, background THC, CO, NOX, and CO2
concentrations in the dilution tunnel shall be recorded by the regulated emissions bench operator. These levels
shall serve as reference background levels for the tests that immediately follow that day. If prior to the start
(within 2 minutes of start) of succeeding tests that day, the background levels measured for that test differ from
the reference background by more than ±15%, testing shall be delayed until corrective measures are taken. If
the greater than +15% change in background is due to a change in the ambient background level (not influenced
by station exhaust or spillage) and cannot be corrected, the testing may resume with a new set of reference
background levels. However, after each test, the ambient background levels shall be monitored by the bench
operator so that the reference background levels can be adjusted if ambient levels continue to change.
Background levels of THC from the tunnel filter shall also be monitored by the instrument bench operator
for fifteen (15) minutes before the start of a test. If the background level of THC in the dilution tunnel differs by
+15% of the background level of THC after the tunnel filter, the test shall be delayed until tunnel levels are
adjusted accordingly.
PDF and ambient temperatures will be monitored with Type K thermocouples coupled to Omega readout
meters. Relative humidity and atmospheric pressure are also measured electronically. Vehicle speed will be
measured using a digital optical encoder as part of the driver's aid system. The emission measurement system
has the capability to measure both continuous and bag emission measurement for the following pollutants (THC,
Nox, CO and CO2). Emission measurements gathered in bags and processed through a GC can be used as a
QC procedure to compare to emissions being measured on a continuous basis.
A pentium class computer will be provided by EPA to be used to log real time output signals from the
Attachment 2 - Page: 13
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
regulated emissions instrumentation and meteorological and speed sensors. The computer is equipped with two
A/D boards (Data Translation model numbers DT2801A and DT2821). Each A/D board will provide eight
(8) differential analog input channels for recording data and sixteen (16) digital output channels for control of
sampling solenoids. The real-time system is controlled by a commercial software package, Labtech Notebook.
Labtech Notebook is a menu driven software package used to configure sampling rates, engineering conversion
factors, data storage modes, etc., for each sampling and control channel.
3.2.2.2 Vehicle Fluid Sampling
Fuel and oil samples will be collected by the contractor from all feasible vehicles after completion of the
dynamometer test(s). Fuel samples from different grades will also be collected from five local gasoline
distributors to account for newer vehicles in which fuel samples cannot be collected. The fuel and oil samples
will be analyzed for sulfur content, aromatic content, elements (see Section 3.3.2.7), and speciated HCs (see
Section 3.3.2.5). Approximately 2-3 ounces of sample will be collected from each vehicle to allow excess
sample to be retained by the contractor for a period of two (2) years after completion of the task order for
potential future compositional analysis. If EPA requires any samples to be analyzed beyond what is specified in
section 3.3.2.7, EPA will pay for shipping cost through a different contract mechanism. Two years after testing
has been completed, ownership of samples revert to the contractor. Disposal of samples may be accomplished
by taking them to the local recycling station.
3.2.3 Quality Assurance for Vehicle Testing
Dynamometer calibration checks will be performed on a daily basis through a combination of coast-
downs and speed calibrations. PDF rpm will also be checked on a daily basis. The dynamometer's torque
sensor is calibrated after field set up using dead weight techniques. PM mass and EC tunnel blanks will be
collected to ensure no significant background problems for the measurement of regulated emissions.
Second by second data shall be aligned to vehicle tractive power and shall be done through the testing
of a vehicle over the test cycle to be used in this test program, the LA92 (Unified Cycle). This process is only
necessary during the configuration or reconfiguration of the sampling system. This configuration also includes
variations in the sampling pipe from the vehicle to the dilution tunnel. Conceivably, different sampling pipes will
require different alignment values. Using parameters for light duty vehicles on a flat (zero grade) roadway this
equation can use the following form:
VSP (kW/metric Ton) = 1.04* v*a+ 0.132*v+00.00121*vA3;
where v is in units of m/s and a in m/s/s. This assumes a value for rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, vehicle
mass, engine efficiency (the 1.04 coefficient of the v*a term), etc., which will vary from vehicle to vehicle.
However, this is sufficient because only timing is being considered.
The contractor shall correlate all the gases to VSP; this is done any time that there is a change in the
plumbing or instrumentation. The best correlation between each gas and VSP shall be determined by shifting
the emission results in relation to VSP. The time shift for individual analyses shall be the offset used between
vehicle's speed and its corresponding emissions.
For the field testing, round-robin comparisons will be made between the transportable dynamometer in
Kansas City (ORD's transportable dynamometer) and the EPA laboratory dynamometers in Ann Arbor, MI.
Three vehicles will be tested at the Ann Arbor labs (each vehicle tested in triplicate) and shipped to Kansas
City for testing on the transportable dynamometer. The types of vehicles might include a new, low mileage
vehicle; an intermediate mileage vehicle (approximately 50,000 miles); and a high mileage, high emitting vehicle.
The contractor shall be responsible for arranging for testing and conducting sample analyses in Kansas City and
vehicle shipment to and from Ann Arbor, MI. The contractor will also be responsible for doing sample
analyses for the Ann Arbor samples. EPA will provide the vehicles for the contractor to use during this
test program.
As another possible QA procedure, all vehicles shall pass by a remote sensing device multiple times.
The contractor can choose to conduct this testing during the preconditioning route or after emissions testing on
Attachment 2 - Page: 14
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
the dynamometer. The data will be used to compare with the other continuous emission monitoring devices
(PEMS units and the dilution tunnel measurements). The data may also be used to determine the
representativeness of the vehicle in relation to the Kansas City regional fleet for HC, CO, and NOX emissions.
Twenty-five vehicles tested during Round 1 of the program will be re-tested during Round 2 to
determine comparability between testing Rounds. These vehicles will be randomly selected from each stratum
as shown in Table 5. This data may also provide information on the effect of ambient temperature on PM
emissions.
Attachment 2 - Page: 15
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Table 5. Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum for Round 2 Re-Testing
Stratum (h) Vehicle Class Age Class Sample size (nh)1
1 Truck Pre 1980 3
2 Truck 1980-1990 5
3 Truck 1991-1995 3
4 Truck 1996 and newer 2
5 Car Pre 1980 2
6 Car 1980-1990 3
7 Car 1991-1995 4
8 Car 1996 and newer 3
Total 25
1 Number of randomly selected vehicles tested during Round 1 re-tested during Round 2.
3.2.4 PEMS and PAMS Vehicle Testing.
To advance the Sponsors' understanding of "real world" vehicle operations and emissions and to
create realistic airshed models of mobile sources, the contractors shall install PEMS and PAMS units on
randomly selected vehicles. EPA will provide technical information on which vehicles will receive the PEMS
and PAMS units (see Appendix C as a reference users manual of a typical PEMS type unit) EPA will
be looking for a mixture of vehicles as specified in Table 5 and will also target vehicles based on their emission
rates and mileage. These devices can record measurements on a second-by-second basis in the following
areas: environmental conditions (e.g., ambient temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, etc), vehicle
parameters (engine rpm, vehicle speed, air conditioning on, OBD codes, etc), date/time stamp, and emissions
(HC, NOx, CO and CO2) PEMS has the capability to operate from battery only for 8 hours or for 16
hours with two batteries. For multiple day data gathering would require the recharging of batteries
which can occur two ways: recharging by electrical outlet overnight or from the vehicle's electrical
system during vehicle normal operating. Fuel to operate the FID analyzer lasts for 8 hours of
continuous operation
The PEMS and PAMS devices will be installed into the owner's vehicle trunk either at the testing
facility or at the owner's home. Installation and removal requires about one hour which includes calibration,
quality assuring and quality controlling (QA/QC) the equipment. All calibrations and QA/QC procedures shall
be recorded and documented for each vehicle. EPA expects that 10 - 20% of the vehicle's might require an
additional hour because of either installation or calibration issues. After installing the PEMS/PAMS device, the
vehicle owner operates the vehicle in a normal fashion that would be typical for that day(s). The owner will be
required to record in a log a date and time that certain events occurred such as changes in the vehicle's load
(e.g., number of passengers in vehicle entered and left the vehicle or other items such as groceries or packages,
etc). Installation and removal of the PEMS/PAMS equipment can occur at either the vehicle emission test site
or at the vehicle owner's home. The contractor shall provide a strategy for testing vehicles using
PEMS/PAMS devices.
Table 6. Use of PEMS and PAMS Devices.
Type of Device Number of Days Number of Vehicles
Round 1 Round 2
PEMS 1-3 20 per device 20 per device
(16 vehicles per week) (16 vehicles per week)
Attachment 2 - Page: 16
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
PAMS
1-7
10-12 per device 10-12 per device
(1 vehicle per week) (1 vehicle per week)
EPA plans on using up to eight PEMS/PAMS devices (depending on which device types are available at
the time of testing) on the recruited vehicles to gather either activity or both activity and emissions data during
the timeframe specified above. EPA will provide the equipment and training in Kansas City at no cost to the
contractor. PEMs devices will be on the vehicle for an average of three days with some vehicles being
repeated to look at the difference between weekday and weekend driving habits. The maximum
amount of data that would be gathered is between 6-20 hours with a typical data set consisting of about 2-6
hours. PEMS devices will only be used in vehicles that will be operated for at least an hour on that day. The
contractor will be responsible for the installation, removal of instrumentation from the vehicle, equipment
calibration and maintenance, data storage, maintaining Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Quality
Management Plan (QMP) procedures and data format conversion (if needed). The contractor will perform a
PEMS evaluation comparing second-by-second data between the dynamometer and "real-world" for each
vehicle. The contractor might need to provide additional incentives to owners who are selected to have one of
these devices installed. PAMS devices will be used to gather "real world" activity of a vehicle so there will be
no minimum amount of vehicle use required. The contractor shall also price the cost of operating PEMS
on a per vehicle basis.
3.2.5 Data Management.
The contractor shall maintain and provide the EPA's Project Officer and all Sponsors with all records
associated with vehicle inspection, maintenance, and testing. All vehicle identifiers shall coincide with the
identifiers used for vehicle recruitment. Data must be collected for all vehicles recruited to the project, even if
the vehicle is not tested.
Data shall be delivered in the input formats for EPA's relational database Mobile Source Observation Data
Base (MSOD). The formats are described and defined in Attachment A. 1. Delivered tables shall be accurate
and complete before they are forwarded to the Sponsors. Any time a significant change or changes to the test
program or its software are adopted, the contractor shall again perform a complete comparison of the data
from the first affected test vehicle to the .dbf data tables generated for that vehicle (See section 4.2 for further
data management issues).
3.3. Sample Analysis.
Chemical and physical analyses of the samples collected during vehicle testing will be required to support
the study. Results from the chemical and physical characterization of the exhaust emissions will provide
information for the SPECIATE emission factor database, profiles for source apportionment studies, and air
toxics emission estimates for trends assessments. Table 7 lists the number of samples that need to be collected.
The contractor shall assume that no compositing of samples will be required. However, results of the pilot
study may indicate that sample compositing is required. The contractor shall develop as part of the QAPP, a
methodology for regularly transferring and review of all data streams within this project. Not all samples will
be analyzed, so the contractor shall propose one or more statistical approaches to choose samples to
be analyzed to meet budget limitations. Compound analyses shall be conducted in a timely manner to
ensure the integrity of the sample collected. The contractor shall specify the time between sample
collection and analysis and the anticipated recovery rate for volatile species. EPA recognizes that
results of the project may be used to develop source apportionment profiles. Contractors may
compare these profiles with previous studies.
Attachment 2 - Page: 17
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Table 7. The number of samples to be collected for each testing Round.
#of LA92 # of samples # of
Type of Sample vehicles Cycles per cycle bkgnd Total
per cycle
Integrated Samples
PM Mass Filters 277 1 3 1 1108
Elements Filters 265 1 0 00
EC/OC Filters 277 1 3(*) 1 1108
Ion Filters 265 1 1 0 265
SVOC PUF or denuder & 265 1 1 0 265
filters
VOCsumma canisters- 265 1 1 0 265
Aldehyde DNPH cartridges 265 1 1 0 265
Continuous Sample Periods
QCM 277 1 1 1 554
TEOM 277 1 2(LA92 2 1108
(Continuous/Integrated) phase 1 & 3
only)
EC 277 1 1 1 554
Nephelometer 277 1 1 1 554
a The contractor may use the PM mass filter for the elements analysis after weighing for mass.
* EC/OC testing requires two, back-to-back quartz filters for each sample. The backup filter is accounted for
as a dynamic filter blank listed in Table 8.
Measurement methods to be used in this project include continuous air monitoring, integrated air sampling,
and vehicle fluid grab sampling. Continuous methods for measurement of fine particle mass provide several
useful data products as well as immediate feedback about the nature of the emissions from vehicles. These
methods are ideally suited to identify the portions of a driving cycle where paniculate emissions are greatest and
least. Rapid time response is also useful for identifying potential high emitting vehicles and determining the
conditioning status of the dilution tunnel. The integrated measurements allow for detailed analysis of chemical
components present in the vehicle's exhaust for which no continuous methods exist. Grab samples will be used
to identify the composition of the fuel and oil used in each vehicle during testing to assess potential mass balance
relationships for specific compound emissions.
PM continuous and integrated air measurements will be extracted from the dilution tunnel through a low
particulate loss 2.5 um cut point pre-classifier. The sample shall be isokinetically partitioned among the sample
and direct measurement instruments using a sample distribution manifold. Throughout the sample extraction and
partition process, the temperature of the sample air just before the PM filter shall be maintained at 47 ± 5°C to
ensure that PM sample loss due to thermophoresis is kept to a minimum.
Sample transport from the partitioning system to the individual instruments and sample collection fixtures
shall be through straight, short transport lines. These lines shall be heated to maintain sample temperature. This
will ensure that PM sample loss due to diffusion and thermophoresis is kept to a minimum. Sample transport
lines shall also be of comparable length.
EPA will be providing equipment for some of the testing to be performed (see Appendix D). The
contractor can also submit alternative equipment that they feel is as good or better than what is
provided by EPA. The contractor shall justify the use, accuracy and cost of such equipment so that a
proper evaluation can be conducted.
Attachment 2 - Page: 1!
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Attachment 2 - Page: 19
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
3.3.1 Continuous Measurements.
Continuous measurements will be collected for PM2 5 (mass and elemental carbon (EC)) and gaseous
compounds (NOx, THC, CO2, and CO). Each method provides useful information on the amount and
composition of PM and gaseous emissions from motor vehicles. The contractor will be required to diligently
monitor this equipment. Operating methods must be approved by the EPA's Project Officer through the
Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) described in Task 1.
Each of the continuous measurement instruments has its own sample environment control. These
include control of sample temperature and, in the case of the TEOM, compensation for changes in sample air
pressure. In addition, to ensure that sample water gain during the gravimetric analysis is compensated for in the
continuous, real-time measurements, sample dew point for the continuous instruments should be controlled to
maintain equivalent partial pressures for water.
3.3.1.1 PM2 5 Mass.
For continuous PM2 5 mass measurements, three methods will be deployed: a quartz crystal
microbalance (QCM), a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM), and a nephelometer. The QCM
and TEOM records and reports total collected mass (|ig) and average concentration (|ig/m3) measured during
the specified collection period. The nephelometer reports a derived mass concentration (|ig/m3). Training for
operating the QCM will be available to the contractor at no cost with the exception of travel. The training will
occur in Kansas City, depending on the contractor's preference.
3.3.1.2 "Elemental" Carbon (EC).
EC concentrations (ngC/m3) will be continuously measured using an Aethalometer™, the Desert
Research Institute (DRI) Photoacoustic Sampler, or an equivalent method. The instrument chosen should have
a minimum resolution of 1 second or less; although the contractor may suggest a higher setting to increase the
sensitivity of the measurement. The contractor can submit alternative equipment to be used to measure
particulates, however, the equipment needs to have the ability to perform high time resolution
measurements so that we can understand the relationship between activity and emission
characteristics.
3.3.1.3 Continuous Gaseous Compound Measurements (see section 3.2.2.1 scenarios)
The measurements listed in this section will be provided under separate contract if Scenario B is
chosen. The contractor for this RFP must ensure that the data described in this section are integrated into this
program.
In addition to PM collection, the EPA transportable dynamometer has a bench capability to measure
total hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide. Total hydrocarbons (THC) will be analyzed with
a Horiba model 236-Heated Flame lonization Detector (FIFID). Background THC will be monitored with a
second FIFID, a Horiba model FIA 34A. Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) will be analyzed with a Horiba Model
CLA-220 Chemiluminescent instrument. Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide will be analyzed with Horiba
Model AIA-210/220 infrared (IR) instruments. A third IR instrument, a Horiba model AIA23-AS, will be
used for analysis of low (< 1000 ppm) carbon monoxide concentrations. All six instruments are rack mounted
and plumbed for introduction of zero, span, and sample gases through the use of solenoid valves and
pushbutton controls.
3.3.2 Integrated PM and Gaseous Compound Analyses.
Integrated PM and gas samples will be collected to allow for detailed chemical characterization of
exhaust components. Integrated samples for PM2 5 mass, elements, EC/OC, ions, SVOCs, and gaseous air
toxics will be collected. All analysis extraction and measurement methods must be approved by the EPA's
Project Officer through the QAPP.
Filters will require treatment and representative chemical analyses before being used in the study. A
minimum of two filters from each lot received from the manufacturers will be analyzed for species to verify that
specifications established in the QAPP have been met. Lots will be rejected if they do not pass this acceptance
test.
Attachment 2 - Page: 20
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
All filters will be individually examined over a light table prior to use for discoloration, pinholes, creases,
or other defects. In addition to laboratory blanks, 10% of all samples will be designated as field blanks that
follow all handling procedures, but do not undergo actual sampling. Duplicate laboratory analysis will be
conducted for every 10 samples. Study protocols call for 10% replicate analyses. These are an important part
of the QA/QC program since these are applied to determine replicate precision that allow for calculation of
sample uncertainty.
Table 8 lists the anticipated number of blanks to be evaluated for the project. The numbers in Table 8
assume that tunnel blanks are collected at the end of the test day, before the start of the test day, and between
each test for PM mass and EC. Ten percent of all samples will have associated field and analytical blanks,
while three transportation blanks are evaluated for each shipment (numbers assume one shipment of samples
occurs each week). Not all samples will be analyzed, so the contractor shall propose one or more
statistical approaches to choose samples to be analyzed to improve cost effectiveness. Compound
analyses shall be conducted in a timely manner to insure the integrity of the sample collected. The
contractor shall specify the time between sample collection and analysis and the anticipated recovery
rate for volatile species.
Table 8. Estimated number of blanks to be analyzed during each testing Round.
Type of Sample Tunnel Sample/ Analytical Transport
Blanks Field Blanks Blanks Blanks Total
Integrated Sample
PM Mass Filters 332 144 144 36 656
Elements Filters * 0 27 27 36 90
EC/OC Filters t 332 1440 144 36 1QS9
Ion Filters 0 27 27 36 90
SVOC PUF or denuder 0 27 27 36 90
& filters
VOC summa canisters 0 27 27 0 90
Aldehyde DNPH 0 27 27 36 90
cartridges
Continuous Sample Periods
QCM 332 332** f n/a 664
TEOM 332 332** f n/a 664
(Continuous/Integrated)
EC 332 332** f n/a 664
Nephelometer 332 332** f n/a 664
THC 332 332** f n/a 664
* The contractor may use the PM mass filter for the elements analysis after weighing for Mass.
** Using humidified Zero Air.
t Field and analytical blanks are the same.
In addition to acceptance testing, some filters will require pre-treatment before sampling. Quartz-fiber
filters may absorb organic vapors with time. Blank quartz-fiber filters used for the assessment of EC/OC will
be heated in air for at least three hours at ~900°C prior to acceptance testing analysis. Sets of filters with levels
exceeding 1.5 ug/cm2 for organic carbon and 0.5 ug/cm2 for elemental carbon will be re-fired or rejected. Pre-
fired filters will be sealed and stored in a freezer at -20°C prior to preparation for field sampling.
Attachment 2 - Page: 21
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
The results of the laboratory filter treatments, chemical analyses, and visual inspections will be recorded in a
database with the lot numbers as described in the data management section. A set of filter IDs will be assigned
to each lot so that a record of acceptance testing can be associated with each sample.
3.3.2.1 PM2 5 Mass.
PM2 5 mass measurements will be determined gravimetrically by the collection of particulates on Teflon
membrane filters. One filter will be used to collect LA92 Phase 1, cold start emissions, a second filter
collecting emissions from LA92 Phase 2, and a third filter for Phase 3 for every vehicle tested. Phase 4 of the
LA92 will not be run for this program. Unexposed and exposed Teflon-membrane filters will be used for
gravimetric analysis. The filters will be equilibrated at a temperature of 20 ±5 °C and a relative humidity of
30±5% for a minimum of 24 hours prior to weighing. Weighing shall be performed on a microbalance with
±0.0001 mg sensitivity. The charge on each filter shall be neutralized by exposure to a polonium source for 30
seconds prior to the filter being placed on the balance pan. The balance operator shall also be grounded during
filter measurement. Pre- and post-weights, check weights, and re-weights (if required) will be recorded as
described in the data management section. All Teflon filters will be analyzed for mass. If practical, PM mass
measurements should be conducted on-site. If on-site measurements are not feasible, shipping and handling of
the filters should be minimized to the extent possible. All filters should only be handled in a clean room
environment. The contractor shall minimize the amount of handling PM filters (one method for minimizing the
handling by the use of cassettes). The contractor might need to use TX40 filters for some high PM emitting
vehicles in order to capture these emissions. A preferred standard for a clean room to measure PM
filters is "Class 1000" standard and a balance that can record to a 0.1 microgram. The contractor
can propose another system or equipment but will need to show justification for its use.
3.3.2.2 Elements Analysis.
Chemical analyses will be performed on select Teflon-membrane filter samples that were collected for the
PM2 5 mass measurements. The contractor may also suggest collecting elements samples on separate filters. At
a minimum, the following elements will be measured for these samples: S, Cl, Cr, Calcium, Silicon,
Phosphorous, Boron, Na, Al, Copper, Iron, Mn, Ni, Zn, As, Hg and Pb. The contractor must demonstrate
minimum detection limits using proposed analytical methods. The contractor may also recommend additional
elements to be measured based on the objectives of the program and the measurement methods proposed.
The additional elements listed above were important ones that came from the lube oil Comparative Toxicity
Study Not all samples will be analyzed, so the contractor shall propose one or more statistical
approaches for choosing samples to be analyzed to improve cost effectiveness.
3.3.2.3 Elemental/Organic Carbon Analysis.
The thermal/optical reflectance (TOR) or thermal/optical transmittance (TOT) methods may be used to
measure organic (OC) and elemental (EC) carbon. EC and OC will be measured using the pre-fired quartz
fiber filters. The contractor shall conduct the EC/OC measurements using one of the two temperature
protocols: 1) the IMPROVE temperature/oxygen cycle, or 2) the NIOSH 5040 temperature/oxygen cycle.
The contractor shall also provide a cost estimate of running both temperature protocols on a single instrument.
Not all samples will be analyzed, so the contractor shall propose one or more statistical approaches
for choosing samples to be analyzed to improve cost effectiveness.
3.3.2.4 Ion Analysis.
Ion chromatography (1C) or an equivalent method will be used to measure water-soluble chloride (Cl"),
nitrate (NO3~), and sulfate (SO4=).
3.3.2.5 Fine Particles/Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds.
Organic compound samples will be analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). XAD
coated teflon-impregnated glass fiber filters and glass honeycomb denuders or polyurethane foam (PUF)
cartridges are recommended to collect samples for speciated SVOC measurements. The number of filters and
denuders required to prevent sample loss will be determined by the contractor, and validated during the pilot
Attachment 2 - Page: 22
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
study. At a minimum, the contractor shall measure the SVOC compounds listed in Table 12. The contractor
should also recommend additional compounds, including methyl- and nitro-substituted PAHs, to be measured
based on the objectives of the program and the measurement methods proposed. Compound analyses shall
be conducted in a timely manner to ensure the integrity of the sample collected. The contractor shall
specify the time between sample collection and analysis and the anticipated recovery rate for volatile
species.
3.3.2.6 Gaseous Air Toxics.
Gaseous air toxic compounds will be collected by Summa canisters (for VOCs) or DNPH cartridges
(for aldehydes and ketones). At a minimum, the contractor shall measure benzene, formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene, acrolein, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (p-,o-,and m-), styrene, n-hexane,
napthalene, and MTBE Compound analyses shall be conducted in a timely manner to ensure the
integrity of the sample collected. The contractor shall specify the time between sample collection and
analysis and the anticipated recovery rate for volatile species.
3.3.2.7 Fuel and Oil Analysis.
Fuel and oil samples will be collected from each vehicle and will be retained by the contractor for a
period of two (2) year after completion of the task order for potential future compositional analysis. If EPA
requires any samples to be analyzed beyond what is specified here, EPA will pay for shipping cost through a
different contract mechanism. Two years after testing has been completed, ownership of samples revert to the
contractor. At a minimum, the following elements will be measured for these samples: S, Cl, Cr, Ca, Si, K, B,
Na, Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn, As, Hg and Pb. The contractor must demonstrate minimum detection limits using
proposed analytical methods. The contractor may also recommend additional elements to be measured based
on the objectives of the program and the measurement methods proposed. The additional elements listed
above were important ones that came from our Comparative Toxicity Study in lube oil. One hundred (100)
fuel and oil samples will be selected by the Project Officer to be analyzed. Tables 9 and 10 show analyses to
be performed for fuel and oil samples, respectively. Disposal of samples may be accomplished by taking
them to the local recycling station.
Attachment 2 - Page: 23
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Table 9. Fuel Sample Analyses.
Test
Method
Gravity, API
Density, kg/1
Reid Vapor Pressure, psi
Sulfur, Wt %
Recovery, vol %
Benzene, vol %
Oxygenate, vol % (identify
compound(s))
T50
T90
Residue, vol %
Loss, vol %
Oxygen, wt %
Composition, Aromatics, vol %
Composition, Oelfins, vol %
Composition, Saturates, vol %
Carbon, wt fraction
Hydrogen, wt fraction
Hydrogen/Carbon ratio
Research Octane Number
Iron, ppm
Copper, ppm
Tin, ppm
Aluminum, ppm
Boron, ppm
Calcium, ppm
Chloride, ppm
Sulfur, ppm
As, ppm
Cr, ppm
Phosphorous, ppm
Silicon, ppm
Nickel, ppm
Lead, ppm
Magnesium, ppm
Sodium, ppm
Zinc, ppm
ASTM D4052
ASTMD4052
ASTM D323
ASTM D4294
ASTMD4615
ASTMD1319
ASTMD1319
ASTMD1319
ASTME191
ASTME191
ASTME191
ASTM D2699
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Attachment 2 - Page: 24
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Water, % (Karl Fisher)
Motor Octane Number
Fuel Economy Number/C Density
C Factor
Net heating Value, btu/lb
ASTM D4926
ASTM D2700
ASTME191
ASTME191
ASTMD3338orD240
Table 10. Oil Sample Analyses
Test
Sulfur Content
Viscosity, cST 40°C, kinematic
Wear Particles, Total Ferrous Particles
Iron, ppm
Copper, ppm
Tin, ppm
Aluminum, ppm
Boron, ppm
Calcium, ppm
Chloride, ppm
Sulfur, ppm
As, ppm
Cr, ppm
Phosphorous, ppm
Silicon, ppm
Nickel, ppm
Lead, ppm
Magnesium, ppm
Sodium, ppm
Zinc, ppm
Water, % (Karl Fisher)
Glycol
Total Acid Number, mg KOH/g
Chromium, ppm
Method
ASTM D4294-90
ASTM D445
ISO 4405
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
ASTM D4926
Infrared Analysis FT-IR
ASTM D664
Elemental Analysis
3.3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Procedures for Equipment.
The contractor will follow and ensure quality assurance and quality control procedures described below
Attachment 2 - Page: 25
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
and throughout this statement of work are performed.
• Daily instrument blank. An appropriate blank will be run daily for each instrument. Generally this is run
after the calibration check and before any samples are analyzed. This confirms that there is no
carryover from the calibration check as well as confirming the blank or zero level of the instrument.
• Daily calibration. All instruments to be used in this study will have calibration checks run a minimum of
once each day. These checks will confirm both response factors and retention times for both GC/MS
analyses.
• Duplicate laboratory analysis for every 10 samples. Study protocols call for 10% replicate analyses.
These are an important part of the QA/QC program since these are applied to determine replicate
precision that allow for calculation of sample uncertainty.
• Control samples. The contractor shall analyze a variety of control samples for QA/QC purposes. These
include calibration, replicate, collocated and blind QA samples.
• Recovery tests for selected analytes. Recoveries are determined within each sample by the addition of
deuterated internal standards prior to extraction. For DNPH analyses internal standards will also be
added.
• Determine and report minimum trapping efficiency. True measures of trapping efficiency are nearly
impossible to determine due to the challenge of generating an appropriate standard stream of the
analyte of interest. A more appropriate method is the use of backup traps to confirm that no quantifiable
levels of compounds are getting through the first trap.
• Determine THC, CO, CO2, NOx and PM from the control vehicle every week. This is done to
determine if there is no drift in the dynamometer.
As stated, a number of filter blanks will be evaluated to ensure quality control. Three laboratory control
blanks will be evaluated for each filter lot group to ensure accuracy of the laboratory measurement technique.
In addition, a minimum of one transport and one field blank will be included with each shipment of filters for
analysis. The transport blank will be shipped with each filter group, but not be removed from the shipping
containers. The field blank will be removed from the shipping container, and loaded into filter packs, but not be
subject to sampling. In addition, daily, dynamic tunnel blanks for PM mass and EC will be collected as
described in the Vehicle Testing section.
(The following paragraph is required for both scenarios as specified in section 3.2.2.1) Under
separate task order, regulated emission analysis instrumentation will be zeroed and spanned before each test.
Calibration gases consisting of a NO in Nitrogen mixture (90.2 PPM NO) and a CO, CO2, and Propane in air
mixture (900 PPM CO, 300 PPM Propane, and 2.54 % CO2) were obtained from National Welders.
Cylinder concentrations will be verified through comparison to NIST standards. Zero air and the FID fuel
(60% H2/40% He) will be obtained. CEM zero air is used with a certification of < 0.5 PPM CO, < 1 PPM
CO2, and < 0.1 PPM HC. Multipoint calibrations are performed on all of the regulated emissions analyzers
after arrival in the field to confirm their linearity.
A quality control standard and a replicate from a previous batch will be analyzed by the contractor with
each set of 10 samples. When a quality control value differs from specifications by more than ± 5% or when a
replicate concentration differs from the original value (when values exceed 10 times the detection limits) by
more than ± 10%, the samples will be re-analyzed. If further tests of standards show that the system calibration
has changed by more than ± 2%, the instrument will be re-calibrated. All results will be recorded as described
in the data management section.
3.3.4 Data Management.
Attachment 2 - Page: 26
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
All sample analysis data shall be provided to the EPA's Project Officer. Continuous measurements will have
time stamps to determine the events occurring during sampling. The contractor shall provide documentation to
associate continuous measurements with specific vehicle testing times and conditions. The contractor shall also
provide filter identification codes to track and catalog all filter samples collected during the study. The filter
identification codes shall allow for the identification of the vehicle(s) tested to obtain the sample. The contractor
shall also prepare proper sample handling and tracking procedures (chain of custody) as required by the
QAPP.
Data shall be delivered in the input formats for EPA's relational database Mobile Source Observation
Data Base (MSOD). The formats are described and defined in Attachment A. 1. Delivered tables shall be
accurate and complete before they are forwarded to the Sponsors. Any time a significant change or changes to
the test program or its software are adopted, the contractor shall again perform a complete comparison of the
data from the first affected test vehicle to the .dbf data tables generated for that vehicle (See section 4.0 for
further data management issues.) ID Codes shall be established for all samples (not just filters).
Attachment 2 - Page: 27
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Table lla. Potential instrument configuration for continuous and quasi-continuous measurement of PM.a
Sensor Operating Environment
Instrument
Manufacturer
OCM. RPM-101
Booker Systems, UK
PPM Monitor.
1105a
R & P, Albany, NY
Dataram - 4
Thermo ME,
Bedford MA
Aethalometer. AE2
McGee Scientific,
Berkeley, CA
Instrument
Type (Measurement)
Inertial Micro-Balance
(PM Mass)
Inertial Micro-Balance
(PM Mass)
Nephelometer
(PM light Scattering)
Light Absorption
(Black Carbon and
PAH)
Sensor
Technology
Quartz Crystal/
Frequency Deficit
Tapered
Element/Filter
Frequency Deficit
Photo Diode/Two
Wavelength
Photo
Diode/Light
Absorption at
Time
Resolution Temperature Range
(sec.) (°C)
1 35 to 50
15 35 to 50
1 35 to 50
300 20 to 40
Sample Flow
Rate
(Lpm)
Ito5
1 to 3.5
1 to 2
5
SOOnm and
370nm
The instruments listed are an example only, based on the descriptions in Section 3.3. The contractor may propose alternative instruments.
Attachment 2 - Page: 2:
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Table lib. Potential instruments for integral measurement of PM.
Instrument
Manufacturer
Filter Holder 6186
R&P, Albany, NY
Instrument Type
(Measurement)
Gravimetric Micro-Balance
(separate filters for LA92 Phase 1
and LA92 Phases 2-4. (PM Mass)
Carbon Aerosol Analysis
(PM Elemental and Organic
Carbon Mass)
Sensor
Technology
Gravimetric
Micro-Balance
Suggested
Sample
Media
Teflo Filter
Sample Operating Environment
Temperature Sample Flow
Range Rate
(°C) (Lpm)
35 to 50 50 to 70
FID Detection of
Thermaly
Liberated CO2
Pre-Fired
Quartz Filter
35 to 50
2tol5
Thermo-Optical
Carbon Aerosol Lab
Analyzer
Sunset Laboratory,
Forest Grove, OR
Filter Holder 6186 ICP-MS and/or XRF Analysis Teflo Filter 35 to 50 50 to 70
R&P, Albany, NY (PM Element Mass)b Dependent
Filter Holder 6186 1C and AC Analysis Quartz Filter 35 to 50 50 to 70
R&P, Albany, NY (PM Water Soluble Ions) Dependent
Filter Holder 6186 GC/MS (PM SVOC) Analysis XAD-4 35 to 50 50 to 70
R&P, Albany, NY Dependent Coated Filter
Summa Cannister GC/MS (VOCs) Analysis Summa 35 to 50 Sample
Anderson Instruments, Dependent Cannister Dependent
Atlanta, GA
DNPH Cartridge GC/MS (Aldehydes and Analysis DNPH 35 to 50 Sample
Anderson Instruments, Ketones) Dependent Cartridges Dependent
Atlanta, GA
1 See Statement of Work
a The instruments listed are an example only, based on the descriptions in Section 3.3. The contractor may propose alternative instruments.
b The contractor may use the PM mass filter for the elements analysis.
Attachment 2 - Page: 29
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Table 12. SVOCs Recommended for Analysis8
Compound
PAHs
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluroene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Acephenathrylene
Pyrene
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene
Cyclopenta[cd]pyrene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Chrysene/Triphenylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzo[j ]fluoranthene
Benzo[e]pyrene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Perylene
Indeno[cd]fluoranthene
Indeno[cd]pyrene
Dibenzo[ah]anthracene
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Coronene
Retene
Saturated Cycloalkanes
Dodecylcyclohexane
Tridecylcyclohexane
Tetradecylcyclohexane
Pentadecylcyclohexane
Hexadecylcyclohexane
Heptadecylcyclohexane
Octadecylcyclohexane
Compound
Steranes
20R,5a(H), 14b(H), 17b(H)-Cholestane
20S,5a(H), 14b(H), 17b(H)-Cholestane
20R,5a(H), 14a(H), 17a(H)-Cholestane
20R,5a(H), 14b(H), 17b(H)-Ergostane
20S,5a(H), 14b(H), 17b(H)-Ergostane
22R,5a(H),14b(H),17b(H)-Sitostane
22S,5a(H), 14b(H), 17b(H)-Sitostane
Hopanes
22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H)-2 lb(H)-29-Norhopane
18a(H)-29-Norneohopane
17a(H)-21b(H)-Hopane
22R&S, 17a(H),2 lb(H)-30-Homohopane
22R&S,17a(H)21b(H)-30-Bishomohopane
Resin Acids
Pimaric Acid
Isopimaric acid
Sandaracopimaric acid
8,15-Pimaredienoic acid
Dehydroabietic acid
7-Oxodehydroabietic acid
Abieta-6,8,11,13,15-pentae-18-oic acid
Abieta-8,11,13,15-tetraen-18-oic acid
Abietic acid
Branched Alkanes
Norpristane
Pristane
Phytane
iso-Nonacosane
anteiso-Triacontane
iso-Hentriacontane
anteiso-Dotriacontane
Attachment 2 - Page: 30
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Nonadecylcyclohexane iso-Hentriacontane
a At a minimum, the compounds listed in this Table should be analyzed. The contractor should recommend
additional compounds that they believe are important for the program related to emission inventory and source
apportionment profile development including, but not limited to, methyl- and nitro-substituted PAHs.
4.0 Quality Assurance Project Plan
4.1 Preparation of Quality Assurance Project Plan and Quality Management Plan
The contractor will submit a draft Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Quality Management
Plan (QMP) to the EPA's Project Officer and to Sponsors for approval within thirty (30) days of task order
execution. The plan will detail sample collection and analysis tasks and procedures for the proposed study and
be implemented in the pilot study. A final QAPP will be submitted within thirty (30) days after completing the
pilot study. Information on completing a QAPP can be found at http://www.epa.gov/quality/qsdocs/r5final.pdf
As part of the QAPP, we are proposing that ten samples collected during each vehicle round (1 & 2) will be
analyzed by the contractor and an independent laboratory chosen by the EPA's Project Officer in a round-
robin test. Two sample sets will be analyzed for each of the major analyses identified in this statement of work:
gravimetric, elements, EC/OC, ions, SVOCs, and gaseous air toxics.
All analysis needs to be completed and reported before Project Officer can approve the start of
Vehicle Testing Round 2. The contractor shall address how this will be accomplished in a timely manner to
allow for quick data review and program review that includes technical direction by the Project Officer and
Sponsors for vehicle testing in Round 2.
The project implementation plan will specify the details required to collect and analyze the source samples in
a manner consistent with the objectives of the study. The plan will be developed in consultation with the EPA's
Project Officer and Sponsors. The QAPP must be approved by the EPA's Project Officer before the
contractor may proceed with sample analysis. The contractor may submit separate QAPPs to obtain approvals
for specific tasks to expedite sample analysis for the project. The final QAPP will cover all aspects of this test
program as outlined in this document including the following areas:
• provide contractual support in maintaining, calibrating, and operating mobile source emissions measurement
equipment used in the field. The equipment may be, but is not limited to, the NERL transportable
dynamometer, roadway integrated sampling systems, and remote sensing of vehicle emissions measuring
systems (RSDs). The necessary support such as analyzing the collected samples, data processing, and
report writing are included.
• pilot programs (including a report on all sample data analyzed)
• vehicle recruitment
• vehicle testing
• speciation
• quality assurance/quality control
• data management and integration
• data analysis
• oral and written reports
• a methodology for regularly transferring and review of all data streams within this project
Attachment 2 - Page: 31
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
4.2 Data Management
Data shall be delivered in the input formats for EPA's relational database Mobile Source Observation Data
Base (MSOD) and Excel format
The formats are described and defined in Attachment A. 1. Delivered tables shall be accurate and complete
before they are forwarded to the Sponsors. Any time a significant change or changes to the test program or its
software are adopted, the contractor shall again perform a complete comparison of the data from the first
affected test vehicle to the .dbf data tables generated for that vehicle.
The level of precision for reporting the data is defined in the table specifications. However, it may be
necessary to alter that specification at some time during the test program. Therefore all raw data files shall be
preserved and delivered to the Sponsors in the instances that reprocessing becomes necessary.
The contractor shall inform the Project Officer when they believe the specified precision is inadequate or
inappropriate. The EPA's Project Officer and the contractor shall then determine what changes in the format
are necessary to accurately store the test data for future use in MSOD.
The test program may propagate new data types and coordination between the testing contractor and the
EPA's Project Officer will need to occur to accommodate that data. The probable input tables for this
statement of work are:
activity_in.dbf
equip_in.dbf
dynob_in.dbf
bagjn.dbf
tmeas_in.dbf
bmeasjn.dbf
time_in.dbf
ttime_in.dbf
tripjn.dbf
rmeas_in.dbf
scanl_in.dbf
scan2_in.dbf
ffbatjn.dbf
tpobd_in.dbf
repar_in.dbf
tmeas_in.dbf
obd_in.dbf
Vehicle information is reported in the table equipjn.dbf Test level is reported in the tables dynobjn.dbf
and tmeas_in.dbf Phase (bag) level information is reported in the tables bagjn.dbf and bmeasjn.dbf. Second
by second data is reported in the tables time_in.prg and rmeas_in.prg.
Any repairs to a vehicle are reported in the table repar_in.dbf
Before delivery of any test data to the EPA's Project Officer, the Contractor shall process the completed
data tables through their quality assurance program. If the contractor chooses to use EPA formats, the EPA's
Project Officer shall provide quality control programs to check the data against, EPAVALDATA and
SBSCHK.prg. These programs shall check the data table for inconsistencies and errors that would interfere
with their loading into EPA OMS/ASD's EF database (MSOD).
Attachment 2 - Page: 32
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
If the contractor enters the data by hand into tables, the contractor shall take extra precautions to assure
typographical and transcription errors have not occurred.
The testing contractor must identify all tests with a unique test identifier (ctr_tst_id) that shall be no greater
than 12 characters in length and a sequential bag number; 1, 2, 3, or 4 for each test phase. All subcontractors
shall identify their test results for the appropriate sample using these same identifiers. The subcontractors shall
follow the same specifications for data reporting and perform all the quality control steps outlined in this
statement of work.
The program EPAVALDATA shall be used to determine the suitability of field level data within the
individual tables in the EPA format with some cross level checking of test and vehicle weights. Some examples
of fixes to the data tables that are normally found from data submitted to the EPA's Project Officer are: 1)
WA_TD names misspelled or not in CAPITAL letters or an incorrect NULL value indicator was used; or 2) the
data may exceed upper or lower bounds for table data (records). If this is the case, the contractor must
contact the EPA's Project Officer to put through a change in the qc_specs program to allow the results in
question to pass data table review. Some data inconsistencies may simply need to be accepted early on in the
test program until enough results have been accumulated that an informed decision can be made to resolve
them.
The contractor and the EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors shall audit (review a subset of records in
accordance to QAAP and QMP documents) and report the number of unique records for the total program
for each input table. The expected total number final inventory of records for this statement of work given a
single LA92 per vehicle + 5% replicates is as follows:
Attachment 2 - Page: 33
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Table name
Equip_in.dbf
Repar_in.dbf
Obd_in
Scanljn
Scan2_in
Dynob in.dbf
Bagjn.dbf
Tmeas in.dbf
Bmeas in.dbf
Time in.dbg
Primary Key
ms id
ms id
ms id
Obd_in
Obd_in
Ctr_tst_id
Ctr_tst_id and
bag_num
Meas id and
ctr tst id
Bag num,
meas id, and
ctr tst id
ctr_tst_id and
dynosecs
Unique Records
480
1 for every repair
1 for every OBD
scan
1 to many for
vehicles with
OBDI
1 to many for
vehicles with
OBDII
530
1590
530
3* The Number of
Records in
tmeas in.dbf
761,610
Records per
Vehicle
1
0 to many
Otol
0 to many
0 to many
Number of Tests Per
Vehicle
Number of Tests Per
Vehicle*Number of
Non-Core analytes
Number of Tests Per
Vehicle*Number of
Non-Core analytes
3 *Number of Tests Per
Vehicle*Number of
Non-Core analytes
1437*Number of Tests
Per Vehicle
Parent Table
None
Equip_in.dbf
Equip_in.dbf
Obd_in
Obd_in
Equipjn.dbf
Dynob in.dbf
Dynob in.dbf
Bag in.dbf
Dynob in.dbf
Parent Key Field
None
equip_in.ms_id
equip_in.ms_id_id
obd_in.ctr_test_id
obd_in.ctr_test_id
Equip_in.ms_id
dynob_in.ctr_tst_id
dynob in.ctr tst id
dynob in.ctr tst id
and bag num
dynob_in.ctr_tst_id
Attachment 2 - Page: 34
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Rmeas in.dbf Ctr tst id,
dynosecs,and
meastype
Ttime in.dbf
Activity in.db
f
Trip in.dbf
Fbat in.dbf Fbatch id
Ctr_tst_id
Tpodb in.dbf
Ffdat_in.dbf Fbatch_id
Pmeas_in.dbf Ctr_tst_id,
trip_id and
tpmeas_dt
The Number of
records in
time in*Number
of Non-Core
analytes
Depends on Number
ofPEMS/PAMS
units
Depends on
Number of
PEMS/PAMS
units
Depends on
Number of
PEMS/PAMS
units
100
1 for every OBD
scan
1437*Number of Tests
Per Vehicle*Number of
Non-Core analytes
Depends on Number of
seconds in vehicle activity
0 to many
0 to many
100
0 to many
0 to many
Number of seconds Per
Vehicle activity
*Number of Non-Core
analytes
Time in.dbf dynob in.ctr tst id
and dynosecs
Trip_in.dbf Trip_id, ctr_tst_id and
tpmeas dt
Equipjn Ctr_tst_id
Activity in.dbf ctr tst id
Fbatch Fbatch id and
ctr tst id
Ttime in.dbf Trip id, ctr tst id and
tpmeas dt
Tpobd in.dbf Ctr tst id, trip id and
tpmeas dt
Ttime in.dbf Ttime in.ctr tst id
Attachment 2 - Page: 35
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
The parent key field of each table must have a corresponding value in the primary key field in the parent
table. Records that do not have a corresponding value in the parent table are "orphans" and can be identified
with the program orphanid.prg.
Data reported on a second by second basis shall be integrated and cross-checked against any data of the
same kind that is mechanically integrated using phase (bag) level techniques using the program sbschkprg. All
second by second data or phase level data that is derived from its integration shall be visually inspected for
alignment and inappropriate transients (spikes and drop outs).
The EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors shall audit one in ten vehicle test data records for its own
assurance of test data quality. The results of each review shall be published for the contractor's review and
comment. Any error found shall be addressed as an action item between the Contractor and EPA's Project
Officer. The EPA's Project Officer will inform the Sponsors and ask for their technical advice before
contacting the Contractor.
5.0 TASKS
5.1 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Quality Management Plan (QMP) Task
The contractor shall provide a Draft QAPP and QMP thirty (30) days after task order issuance for review
by the EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors. The contractor shall incorporate all feasible comments received
before the pilot testing begins.
A final QAPP and QMP will be submitted within thirty (30) days of completing the pilot test program for
use in both Rounds 1 and 2 of the vehicle test program. The QAPP shall conform to the EPA ANSI/ASQC E-
4 standard and should have an appendix containing all applicable standard operating procedures (SOPs).
The contractor shall adhere to all applicable SOPs and the QA/QC procedures recommended therein.
Applicable SOPs are available for the transportable dynamometer, sampling equipment and procedures, RSDs,
and analytical chemistry. The contractor shall notify the EPA's Project Officer immediately if they encounter
any equipment failures that cannot be readily remedied by the contractor, or technical problems that may impact
the quality or on-time receipt of deliverables, or if any required equipment or supplies are unavailable to
accomplish the required work under this task order.
5.2 Vehicle Recruitment Tasks
The contractor will provide vehicle recruitment services to the project. The contractor shall submit
monthly progress reports, and conduct the tasks defined as follows:
5.2.1 Vehicle Recruitment Pilot Study
The contractor shall conduct a pilot study in KCMA to evaluate recruitment methods and incentive packages to
identify the adequacy of the proposed recruitment process.
5.2.2 Cohort/Vehicle Analysis
Identify a cohort of private individuals or residences for recruitment of vehicles to the dynamometer
emissions testing program in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area (KCMA). The cohort should consist of a
minimum of 1,000 members who possess a minimum of 2,000 total vehicles. The cohort shall consist of a
sociodemographically diverse population. The total vehicle population shall include the minimum number of
vehicles required for each of the six stratum identified in Table 1 of this statement of work. (Note: Specific
guidelines have not been established on what constitutes a "diverse" population. In general, the
contractor shall ensure that multiple ethnicities and socioeconomic classes are included in the project.
The contractor shall also ensure the demographic data is obtained for all respondents.) The following
Attachment 2 - Page: 36
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
subtasks shall be performed for the selected cohort.
5.2.2.a Cohort Frame Analysis
The contractor shall identify the listing(s) or frame(s) from which the cohort was recruited. The
contractor shall provide, in report form, a description of the list(s) or frame(s), to cover the following topics: (1)
list type and availability, i.e., publicly available, commercially available, etc.,(2) underlying sources from which
the list(s) were compiled, e.g., phone directories, etc., (3) pricing (cost for obtaining information, lists, gathering
and analyzing the information), (4) restrictions on availability, use or publication, and (5) any additional topic(s)
that the contractor considers pertinent in the context of the PM emissions study.
5.2.2.b Cohort Recruitment (Respondent/Non-Respondent) Analysis
The contractor shall provide a description of the process through which the cohort was recruited, to
cover the following topics: (1) design of the cohort, including stratification and sampling methods, (2) whether
selection probabilities varied among individual members or subgroups within the cohort, based on the design,
(3) the response rate achieved during the recruitment process, and whether non-response adjustments would
be appropriate for analysis of data collected from the cohort, (4) availability of contact information and
descriptive information for non-respondents to the cohort and (5) any additional topic(s) that the contractor
considers pertinent in the context of the study. As part of this task, the contractor shall provide the EPA Project
Officer with access to the vehicle registration database for the KCMA within fifteen (15) days of task order
issuance.
5.2.3 Cohort/Vehicle Fleet Analysis
Compare the distribution of vehicles, by age and class, in the cohort fleet to the Kansas City
metropolitan area fleet. The contractor shall determine the representativeness of the cohort fleet to the regional
fleet. The contractor shall use parametric or non-parametric statistical tests to make comparisons, as
appropriate. For any test applied, the contractor shall provide a retrospective estimate of the power of the test
(Note: Power refers to an analytical process used on all analyses using standard accepted techniques
for the statistics used). The contractor shall also compare the cohort and Kansas City fleets to the national
fleet characteristics, as feasible.
5.2.4 Cohort/Vehicle Emission Analysis
Compare exhaust emissions of HC, NOx, and CO from the cohort fleet to the KCMA fleet. The
contractor shall determine the comparability of the cohort fleet emissions distribution to the regional fleet by
comparing exhaust emissions from cohort and non-cohort vehicles using remote sensing devices (RSDs) in
Kansas City. The contractor shall use parametric or non-parametric statistical tests to make comparisons, as
appropriate. For any test applied, the contractor shall provide a retrospective estimate of the power of the test.
The contractor shall detail the data being collected and the methods of comparison.
5.2.5 Cohort/Vehicle Summary Analysis
Prepare a report that summarizes the chosen cohort for the emissions testing program, based on socio-
demographic characteristics, and compares the cohort fleet, based on vehicle characteristics and emissions, to
the regional and national fleets. The report shall also include the items listed in Section 3, as well as a discussion
of potential sampling or non-sampling biases that may result from using the cohort as the recruitment population
for the emissions testing program.
5.2.6 Vehicle Recruitment Sample Plan
Attachment 2 - Page: 37
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Design a sampling plan for the random selection of 480 vehicles to be tested for exhaust emissions using
the EPA dynamometer. For Round 1, 170 vehicles will be recruited from the cohort and 80 vehicles will be
recruited from the cohort non-response families. Round 2 vehicle testing will consist of another 230 different
vehicles from the cohort and 25 vehicles recruited from Round 1 for re-testing. The plan shall target a stratified
sample as identified in Table 1 of this statement of work. This task shall not commence until the contractor has
received written approval from the EPA's Project Officer. If use of the registration sample for recruitment will
result in different costs, the contractor shall note these costs in their proposal.
5.2.7 Vehicle Recruitment
5.2.7a Vehicle Recruitment (Round 1)
The contractor shall recruit vehicles to the emissions testing program for Round 1 of the project using
the sampling plans developed for Task 5. The contractor shall retain, at a minimum, the following information
for all persons recruited to the program, whether they participate or not: (1) contact information, (2) location of
residence, (3) any socio-demographic description information available for the residence or individual,
emphasizing indicators listed in 5.2.2 above, (4) the date, time and mode of each attempted contact, and (5) the
outcome of each attempted contact. This task shall not commence until the contractor has received written
approval from the EPA's Project Officer.
5.2.7b Vehicle Recruitment (Round 2)
The contractor shall recruit vehicles to the emissions testing program for Round 2 of the project using
the sampling plans developed for Task 5. The contractor shall retain, at a minimum, the following information
for all persons recruited to the program, whether they participate or not: (1) contact information, (2) location of
residence, (3) any socio-demographic description information available for the residence or individual,
emphasizing indicators listed in 5.2.2 above, (4) the date, time and mode of each attempted contact, and (5)
the outcome of each attempted contact. This task shall not commence until the contractor has received written
approval from the EPA's Project Officer.
5.2.8 Non-Response Assessment
As part of the recruitment process, eighty (80) people who did not positively respond to the initial
request to participate in the cohort will be randomly selected. These owner's vehicles will be recruited to the
program to assess any potential bias in results from the recruitment of volunteers to the study. A list of non-
respondent criteria will be developed with approval from EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors. The number of
vehicles to target in each strata for the non-response analysis is shown in Table 3 (section 3.1.3).
5.2.9 Participation Incentives
Incentives will be required for study participants. Potential incentives include rental cars, cash, free
gasoline, free vehicle repairs, and free cleanup of participant vehicles. The contractor shall develop recruitment
package(s) that will achieve a high participation rate to the study from the randomly chosen subjects (both
cohort participants and non-respondents, if applicable).
5.2.10 Post Round 1 Vehicle Analysis
After the completion of Round 1 vehicle testing, the contractor shall provide to the Project Officer and
the Sponsors all the results (emission results (only the PM mass filter and regulated emission), data analysis, any
issues, technical directions or concerns that occurred) for their review. Based on the results of Round 1
recruitment strata and/or testing procedures might need to be adjusted before the start of vehicle testing
Attachment 2 - Page: 3!
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
(Round 2). The contractor shall not start Round 2 of vehicle testing without prior approval from the Project
Officer.
5.3 Vehicle Testing Task
The contractor shall provide vehicle testing services to the project for the pilot and intensive field study.
The contractor shall submit monthly progress reports, and conduct the tasks defined as follows:
5.3.1 Pilot Vehicle Testing Task
The contractor for this program will conduct a pilot test in the Kansas City area to determine and
finalize all testing methodologies, quality assurance and quality control procedures, and data management
procedures. For the pilot test program, three vehicles, a newer vehicle, intermediate aged and mileage vehicle
and a high emitter, will be tested a minimum of three times each on an EPA fixed-site dynamometer in Ann
Arbor, MI and on the transportable EPA dynamometer located in Kansas City. All vehicle testing and sample
analysis procedures described in Section 3.2 and 3.3, respectively, will be conducted for the pilot test study.
Within one month after completing the pilot study, the contractor shall complete a report that includes emission
rates obtained for regulated pollutants and PM from any vehicles tested during the pilot study. This report shall
be submitted to the EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors for use in evaluating results obtained in the pilot study.
The fuel and oil used at Ann Arbor, MI testing facilities will be shipped with the vehicles for use in Kansas
City. The contractor will provide a determination by conducting an experiment or series of experiments to
determine if 10 hours of tunnel purging (tunnel fans on) is needed to achieve a stable tunnel operation (this
pertains to tunnel wall loss or entrainment issues) or if other methods that could achieve goal but cost less.
5.3.2 Vehicle Testing Task (Specialized sampling and analytical needs)
The contractor shall complete development and implement the capability to collect and speciate
gaseous and PM organic and PM inorganic samples during any field study involving the transportable
dynamometer. Emission rates of these compounds using the equipment listed in Table 11 shall be reported in
units of grams per mile (g/mile).
5.3.3 Vehicle Testing Task
The contractor shall provide a cost break down for both scenarios listed in section 3.2.2.1 including
the following sub-tasks listed below.
5.3.3.1 Protective Covering for Equipment and Test Vehicles: The contractor shall provide protection of
the testing equipment and the recruited vehicles from the elements during participation in the study but is not
required to be heated
5.3.3.2 Vehicle Testing and Data Collection: Vehicles scheduled for testing will be conditioned, cold
soaked overnight, then tested using the cold start, LA-92. For the cold-start tests, regulated emissions will be
measured over three phases of the test cycle by integrating the real-time data. Dilute exhaust bag samples for
each of the three test phases and one background bag sample shall be collected from the CVS for comparison
with the integrated THC measurement (FID) and for on- and off-site GC analysis. Programming of equipment
and design of the experiment shall be such as to enable separate PM samples to be drawn from each of the four
separate phases of the LA-92 driving schedule. All tests should be scheduled so that a minimum of five vehicles
per day can be tested.
Attachment 2 - Page: 39
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
5.3.3.3 RSD Evaluation: The contractor shall evaluate exhaust emissions of the test vehicles for NOx, HCs,
and CO using RSD during the conditioning process of the vehicle and/or immediately after dynamometer
testing. An alternate approach is to use second by second data from the Unified Cycle emissions measured on
the chassis dynamometer.
5.3.3.4 Vehicle Fluid Sampling: The contractor shall have selected vehicle's fuel and oil samples analyzed
and report the results to the Project Officer and Sponsors. The contractor shall also have KCMA fuel samples
analyzed and report the results to the Project Officer and Sponsors. The contractor will provide cost estimates
for gathering, shipping (if any) and analysis for both fuel and oil on a per sample basis and for each
methodology listed in section 3.3.2.7.
5.3.3.5 PEMS / PAMS Data: The contractor shall report data obtained in the study to EPA's Project
Officer and Sponsors. Data shall be delivered in the input formats for EPA's relational database MSOD and
in Excel Spreadsheets. A separate cost estimate for each round of vehicle testing will be provided on a per
vehicle basis for each PEMS and PAMS measurement. A separate cost estimate will also be provided for the
use of PAMS during the vehicle conditioning route on a per vehicle basis.
5.3.3.6 Reports: The contractor shall report data obtained in the study to the EPA's Project Officer using
Excel spreadsheets that have been approved by the EPA's Project Officer for compatibility with their data
system. If needed, the original Excel and Lotus data files can be converted to a dbf format. The contractor
shall report to the EPA's Project Officer the status of equipment following its assembly in the field and prior to
its use in the study.
Upon completion of the study (within two months following testing), The contractor shall submit a draft final
report to the EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors detailing their work in the study. Tables will be included
showing accepted and rejected vehicle IDs with OMB2060-0078 or ICR 0619.08 questionnaire information,
visible smoke observations, and emission rates for regulated pollutants and PM. The draft report shall be
submitted for approval by all study participants.
5.4 Speciation Tasks
5.4.1 Pilot Methods Testing Task
The contractor will review, document, and change if necessary, all procedures, methods, and sample
analyses to ensure proper sampling handling and emission measurements for the testing program. The
contractor shall update the QAPP to represent any changes in the procedures or methods resulting from the
pilot study. The contractor will provide and prepare sampling equipment and sampling substrates required for
the collection of the samples listed in Table 7 during the pilot study.
5.4.2 Source Testing Equipment Preparation Task
The contractor will provide and prepare sampling equipment and sampling substrates required for the
collection of the samples listed in Table 7. The contractor will pre-test the continuous and integrated sampling
equipment prior to installation at the pilot testing site to ensure proper operation and familiarity by field
personnel. The contractor will provide personnel to operate the samplers and collect and store each sample.
5.4.3 Operating Continuous Measurements of Fine PM Task
The contractor will provide and operate real-time monitors for the measurement of fine particle mass and
fine particle elemental carbon as shown in Table 11. The contractor shall also provide estimates of mass and
Attachment 2 - Page: 40
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
EC concentrations collected during dynamic tunnel blank sample collection to evaluate the condition of the
dilution tunnel before conducting tests on the next vehicle. The contractor shall submit separate cost estimates
for operating and analyzing data for each equipment type as follows:
5.4.3.1 QCM
5.4.3.2 TEOM
5.4.3.3 Nephelometer
5.4.3.4 EC
5.4.4 Integrated Sample Collection and Sample Analyses Task
The contractor shall collect samples on each vehicle tested, and conduct laboratory analyses on the number
of samples as shown in Table 7.
5.4.5 Integrated Sample Analyses Task
The contractor shall perform sample analyses for integrated PM mass, EC/OC, elements, ions, SVOC's,
and gaseous air toxics based on a percent of the sample estimates shown in Table 7. The contractor shall
collect samples for all vehicles tested, as shown in Table 7. All samples not analyzed shall be stored in a freezer
and be retained by the contractor for a period of two (2) year after completion of the task order for potential
future compositional analysis. If EPA requires any samples to be analyzed beyond what was required in this
task order, EPA will pay for shipping cost through a different contract mechanism. Two years after testing has
been completed, ownership of samples revert to the contractor. The contractor shall provide cost estimates for
these tasks on a per vehicle/sample basis for the following: 1) the analysis of only fifty (50) vehicles
between Rounds 1 and 2 combined; and 2) total costs for testing all vehicles in Rounds 1 and 2 of the
project. Costs for PM2 5 mass gravimetric analysis shall be given for all vehicles only. The contractor can
propose to do composites and composite samples may be approved by the PO. Each composite
sample shall be considered as one sample. Any analytical preparation costs should be included as a
lump sum in this task. The contractor may want to review the literature since these compounds have
been measured in previous vehicle emission studies and some are referenced in this document. The
contractor needs to provide per sample and bulk sample costs to determine potential economies of
scale in multiple sample analyses. If there are no cost differences, the proposed pricing should
reflect this.
The costs shall be provided based on the compounds analyzed as follows:
5.4.5.1 PM2 5 Mass Gravimetric Analysis.
Three filter samples will be collected and analyzed for each vehicle tested. Costs for PM2.5 mass
gravimetric analysis shall be given for all vehicles only.
5.4.5.2 Elements.
One filter sample will be collected for each vehicle tested (three if the PM2.5 mass filters are used for this
analysis). The number of samples to be collected is shown in Table 7. The contractor may use the filters
collected and analyzed for PM2 5 mass for this task. The contractor will indicate their ability to measure these
elements within both fuel, oil and PM samples and the sensitivity of the measurement technique(s) (e.g. 10
namograms per mile) that they propose to use. The contractor should indicate their knowledge of measurement
techniques.
Attachment 2 - Page: 41
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
5.4.5.3 EC/OC.
One sample will be collected for each vehicle tested. The number of samples to be collected is shown in
Table 7.
5.4.5.4 Ions.
One sample will be collected for each vehicle tested. The number of samples to be collected is shown in
Table 7.
5.4.5.5 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds.
One sample will be collected for each vehicle tested. The number of samples to be collected is shown in
Table 7. The contractor shall analyze, at a minimum, the compounds listed in Table 8. The contractor should
also recommend additional compounds that they believe are important for the program related to emission
inventory and source apportionment profile development. EPA recognizes that results of the project may
be used to develop source apportionment profiles. Contractors may compare these profiles with
previous studies.
5.4.5.6 Gaseous Air Toxics.
One Summa canister and DNPH sample will be collected for each vehicle. The number of samples to be
collected is shown in Table 7.
5.4.6 Data Analysis Task.
The contractor will compile analyzed data into a validated database that will be made available to the
EPA's Project Officer. Data validation procedures will be included in the QAPP.
5.4.7 Analysis of Continuous PM and EC Data Task
The continuous particulate measurements will be made available promptly for the relevant personnel
attached to the project. The data will be provided in individual files pertaining to a given day of measurement in
the case of ambient sampling, or to a particular vehicle in the case of source sampling. The data will be
calibrated to an agreed upon standard of pressure and temperature. The data will be time averaged and
accumulated over the entire sampling period and will be compared with filter-based measurements.
5.4.8 Maintenance of Emission Equipment Task
The contractor shall maintain, calibrate, and operate all emission equipment except the transportable
dynamometer to make real-world vehicle emissions measurements in the field and laboratory. The other
equipment may include but not be limited to RSDs and other PM equipment used in conducting roadside, tunnel
air pollution studies and PEMS/PAMS. The contractor shall repair the equipment on an as needed basis.
However, any modification of the equipment must be approved in writing by the EPA's Project Officer.
5.4.9 Health, Safety and Environmental Practices Task The contractor shall comply with all federal
health and safety, environmental, waste handling, and other applicable work rules. The contractor shall also
follow proper laboratory, field testing, and vehicle testing practices for all work required by this task order.
6.0 Reporting Requirement and Deliverables
The contractor shall address and report all data and technical issues required in Sections 2 through 5 of this
task order. A draft final report shall be prepared and submitted electronically and in hard copy. Once the draft
report is approved, the final report shall be submitted to the EPA project officer. Documents shall be prepared
Attachment 2 - Page: 42
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
using a version of Microsoft Word or comparable systems when feasible or unless otherwise specified in the
task order. Electronic media materials delivered to the EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors shall be provided
on 3 1/2" disks, CD-R, DVD-R or hard-drive. Copies of all written deliverables shall, to the extent possible,
be double-spaced copies, and shall be delivered in reusable/recyclable envelopes. The contractor shall
develop and maintain files supporting the requirements of each task.
6.1 Test Project Workplan
The contractor shall deliver to the EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors for approval that includes all
descriptions, cost, responsibilities, schedules described in this document including:
- Pilot vehicle testing
- Quality assurance project plan
- Vehicle recruitment plan
- Participate in on-going communications to develop a work plan and coordinate action items and scheduling.
Deliver monthly reports summarizing activities and costs.
- Report repairs needed as a result of any evaluation of the dynamometer.
- Prepare a project implementation plan within four weeks of task order approval.
- Prepare a draft final technical report of study results
- Complete a revised technical report
6.2 Other Deliverables
Other reports or meetings dealing with problems or special situations that may arise shall be requested
through technical direction from EPA's Project Officer.
7.0 Meetings and Technical Direction
A kick-off meeting to discuss this Project with EPA's Project Officer and Sponsors will be held. Meetings
to review data and analyses will be held on an as needed basis. The Project Officer is authorized to provide
technical direction, which clarifies the Statement of Work as set forth in this task order. Before accepting any
action under technical direction, the contractor shall ensure that the technical direction falls within the scope of
work for this task order. Technical direction will be confirmed in writing, by the EPA's Project Officer, within
five calendar days after verbal issuance. The EPA Project Officer will forward a copy to the respective
Sponsors' representatives. Technical directions must be within the scope of the task order and the Statement
of Work. Technical direction includes (1) direction to the contractor which assists it in accomplishing the
Statement of Work, and (2) comments on and approval of reports and other deliverables. The Contracting
Officer is the only person authorized to make changes to this task order. Any changes must be approved by
the Contracting Officer in writing, as a modification to the task order. Upon issuance of written technical
direction, the contractor shall submit for inspection copies of all work in progress at any time under this task
order.
Attachment 2 - Page: 43
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
8.0 Schedule:
Final Project Workplan March 5, 2004
Draft Quality Assurance Documents March 20, 2004
Pilot Vehicle Testing April 20, 2004
Final Quality Assurance Documents May 19, 2004
Vehicle Recruitment Plan (including cohort evaluation) May 19, 2004
Begin Vehicle Recruitment (Round 1) June 4, 2004
Begin Vehicle Testing (Round 1) June 18, 2004
End Vehicle Testing (Round 1) August 18, 2004
Interim Report on Round 1 September 18, 2004
Begin Vehicle Recruitment (Round 2) January 3, 2005
Begin Vehicle Testing (Round 2) January 18, 2005
End Vehicle Testing (Round 2) March 30, 2005
Draft Final Report June 15, 2005
Final Report August 15, 2005
If the contractor is not comfortable with the schedule listed, the contractor should propose an
alternative schedule and describe their rationale for this change.
Attachment 2 - Page: 44
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
References
Cadle, S. H.; Mulawa, P. H.; Ball, 1; Donase, C.; Weibel, A.; Sagebiel, J. C.; Knapp, K. T.; Snow, R.
(1997) Particulate emission rates from in-use high-emitting vehicles recruited in Orange county, California.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 31: 3405-3412.
Cadle, S. H.; Mulawa, P.; Hunsanger, E. C.; Nelson, K.; Ragazzi, R. A.; Barrett, R.; Gallagher, G. L.;
Lawson, D. R.; Knapp, K. T.; Snow, R. (1999) Light-duty motor vehicle exhaust particulate matter
measurement in the Denver, Colorado, area. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 49: PM-164-174.
Durbin, T. D.; Smith, M. R.; Norbeck, J. M.; Truex, T. J. (1999) Population density, particulate emission
characterization, and impact on the particulate inventory of smoking vehicles in the South Coast Air Quality
Management District. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 49: 28-38.
Dzubay, T. G; Stevens, R. K.; Gordon, G. E.; Olmez, L; Sheffield, A. E.; Courtney, W. J. (1988) A
composite receptor method applied to Philadelphia aerosol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 22: 46-52.
Hildemann, L. M.; Markowski, G. R.; Jones, M. C.; Cass, G. R. (1991) Submicrometer aerosol mass
distributions of emissions from boilers, fireplaces, automobiles, diesel trucks, and meat-cooking operations.
Aerosol Sci. Technol. 14: 138-152.
Kleeman, M. J.; Schauer, J. J.; Cass, G. R. (2000) Size and composition distribution of fine particulate matter
emitted from motor vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34: 1132-1142.
Lawson, D. R.; Smith, R. E. (1998) The northern front range air quality study: a report to the Governor and
General Assembly. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University; December.
Magliano, K. L. (1998) Chemical mass balance modeling of data from the 1995 integrated monitoring study.
Sacramento, CA: California Air Resources Board.
Maricq, M. M.; Podsiadlik, D. H.; Chase, R. E. (1999) Gasoline vehicle particle size distributions: comparison
of steady state, FTP, andUS06 measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33: 2007-2015.
Motallebi, N. (1999) Wintertime PM2 5 and PM10 source apportionment at Sacramento, California. J. Air
Waste Manage. Assoc. 49: PM-25-34.
Norbeck, J. M.; Durbin, T. D.; Truex, T. J. (1998) Measurement of primary particulate matter emissions from
light-duty motor vehicles. Riverside, CA: University of California, College of Engineering, Center for
Environmental Research and Technology; prepared for Coordinating Research Council, Inc. and South Coast
Air Quality Management District, CRC Project No. E-24-2.
Ramadan, Z.; Song, X.-H.; Hopke, P. K. (2000) Identification of sources of Phoenix aerosol by positive
matrix factorization. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50: 1308-1320.
Sagebiel, J. C.; Zielinska, B.; Walsh, P. A.; Chow, J. C.; Cadle, S. H.; Mulawa, P. A.; Knapp, K. T.;
Zweidinger, R. B.; Snow, R. (1997) PM-10 exhaust samples collected during EVI-240 dynamometer tests of
in-service vehicles in Nevada. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31: 75-83.
Attachment 2 - Page: 45
-------
Performance Work Statement
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Schauer, J. J.; Rogge, W. F.; Hildemann, L. M.; Mazurik, M. A.; Cass, G. R. (1996) Source apportionment of
airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers. Atmos. Environ. 30: 3837-3855.
Schauer, J.J., and G.R. Cass, 2000, "Source apportionment of wintertime gas-phase and particle-phase air
pollutants using organic compounds as tracers," Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 1821-1832.
Yanowitz et al. 2000
Attachment 2 - Page: 46
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The contractor shall in general fill out the data tables completely and as best they
are able using the supporting documentation and tables.. If they have questions they should contact the project
officer (PO) to receive guidance. If the contractor believes the categories presented are inadequate or
incorrect they shall, in consort with the PO, define new categories for the data entry. If the value is nor known
or cannot be known the fields appropriate null value shall be taken from the table qc_specs.dbf.
VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT INFORMATION:
Vehicle/equipment information is data which is required by the equipment procurement data table, equipjn.dbf
and shall be recorded as soon as a piece of equipment is in contractor's custody. The equipjn.dbf data table
shall be delivered to the project officer along with the test data. Its fields shall be populated as follows:
$ The vehicle's (not the engine's) serial number or VTN shall be entered into the field
equip_in.veh_ms_id. The serial number for a piece of nonroad equipment is generally imprinted on a
metal plate which is attached to the unit. It is generally preceded by "S/N" or some similar designation.
The field retains its "veh" , or vehicle, designation to signify mobile source versus engine-only
information within our database.
$ The engine's serial number shall be entered into the field equip_in.eng_ms_id. The serial number for an
engine is generally imprinted on a metal plate which is attached to the block. It is generally preceded by
"S/N" or some similar designation.
$ "KC_PM" shall be entered in the field equip_in.wa_id.
$ The date and time of day the equipment was received into Contractor's custody shall be reported in the
field equip_in.test_date and equip_in.test_tod, respectively.
$ The contractor's unique test engine/equipment identifier for in-house tracking purposes shall be
reported in the field equip_in.ctr_tst_id.
$ An appropriate value for the site shall be selected from the table site.site and be reported in the field
equip_in.site.
$ The allowable values for equipment procurement methodologies to be used in this contract are located
in the field procmeth.procmeth from the procmeth.dbf table. The field procmeth.procmeth_d. in this
same table describes each of the allowable values. The correct value for each piece of equipment
tested shall be reported in the field equip Jn.procmeth.
$ The value "YES" shall be recorded in the field equipJn.highway for a piece of equipment (a vehicle,
truck or bus) which is intended for highway operation and "NO" for non-road equipment.
$ A short description of the purpose or use of a piece of test equipment or the equipment platform from
which a test engine was derived shall be recorded in the field equipJn.purpose. If this information is
not known or cannot be determined, i.e, a test engine not associated with an equipment platform, the
Attachment 3 - Page: 1
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
value "NULL" shall be entered in this field.
$ "2201020110" shall be entered for the LDT1, and "2230070000" for the type 2B trucks shall be
entered into the field equip_in.scc. In the case of a non-road piece of equipment an appropriate values
shall be selected from the sec. sec.
$ If the equipment to be tested has an odometer at the time of procurement, the odometer's value shall be
entered into the field equip_in.proc_odom. If the equipment does not have an odometer, then the
contractor shall enter "0 " in this field.
$ The number of hours of engine operation as displayed on the engine hour meter shall be recorded in the
field equip_in.hour_meter. If it is known that the engine hour meter on a particular test engine is
malfunctioning or if the hours of operation cannot be determined from a direct reading of the engine
hour meter, then the value "0" shall be recorded in the equip_in.hour_meter field. However, if a "good
faith" estimate of the number of hours of engine operation can be obtained from the owner/operator of a
particular piece of equipment, that estimate shall be rounded to the nearest 10 hours and entered into
the equip_in.hour_meter field.
$ "DIES" shall be entered into the field equip_in.fueltype for equipment which is powered by diesel fuel
and "GAS" for equipment powered by gasoline.
$ The vehicle manufacturer's name shall be selected from the field company.company from the table
company.dbf and entered into the field equip_in.vehcompany.
$ The engine manufacturer's name shall be selected from the field company.company from the table
company.dbf and entered into the field equipjn.engcompany.
$ The vehicle's nominal engine displacement in cubic inches shall be entered in the field equip_in.disp_cid.
If the engine displacement is labeled in liters or cubic centimeters this field shall be reported as "0".
$ The vehicle's engine displacement in liters shall be entered in the field equip_in.disp_liter. If the engine
displacement is labeled in cubic centimeters that value shall be multiplied by 1000, and reported to the
nearest tenth of a liter. If the engine displacement is labeled in cubic inches this field shall be reported
as "0".
$ The allowable values for the method of fuel delivery for a vehicle are found in the field
fuel_del.fuel_deliv and their description in the field fuel_del.fuel_del_d. The correct fuel delivery code
for the vehicle shall be reported in the field equip_in.fuel_deliv. The vehicles in this contract will all
probably have fuel injection, "FI" or carburated "CARB".
$ The correct fuel injection method for the unit shall be reported in the field equip_in.fi_type. The
allowable values to indicate the type of fuel injection are found in the field fi_type.fi_type in the
fi_tytpe.dbf table and are described in the field fi_type.fi_type_d. All of the equipment procured under
this contract is expected to be described as "DIRECT", "PFI" (Port Fuel Injection), "TBI" (Throttle
Attachment 3 - Page: 2
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
Body Inject) though "INDIR" shall be used, as appropriate.
$ The allowable values to describe the process by which intake air enters the engine for combustion are
found in the field aspirate.aspirated in the table aspirate.dbf and are described in the field
aspirate.apirate_d. The correct value for the engine to be tested within the equipment shall be reported
in the field equip_in.aspirated.
$ The number of cylinders in the engine to be tested is recorded in the field equip_in.cylinder.
$ The allowable values to describe the type of catalyst which is present on the vehicle are located in the
field cat_type.cat_type in the table cat_type.dbf and are described in the field cat_type.cat_type_d.
The correct value shall be reported in the field equip_in.cat_type.
$ A brief description as to the configuration of any emission control system equipment present in the test
unit shall be entered into the equip_in.ecs_descpt field (up to 50 characters).
$ The allowable values to indicate that the catalyst control configuration is close loop are "YES" or
"NO". It assumed that the target vehicles in this contract that all the SI vehicles shall be "YES" and all
the CI vehicles shall be "NO". The appropriate value shall be reported in the field equip_in.closedloop.
$ An appropriate value indicating the vehicle class shall be selected from vehclass.vehclass and recorded
in the field equipjn.vehclass.
$ The equipment's model year will be reported into the field equip_in.model_yr in the 4-digit century
inclusive format. If this information is not known, the value "0" shall be entered in this field.
$ The vehicle make shall be recorded in the field equipjn.make.
$ The vehicle model name given to the vehicle by the vehicle manufacturer shall be entered into the field
equip_in.model_name.
$ The equipment build date shall be recorded in the date field equip_in.v_bld_date. The format shall be
MM/DD/YY. If the actual date is not reported on the equipment or in supporting literature about the
particular unit, then the build date shall be reported as MM/15/YY. If the build date cannot be
determined, the null date value shall be reported by leaving the field blank.
$ The engine build date shall be recorded in the date field equip_in.e_bld_date. The format shall be
MM/DD/YY. If the actual date is not reported on the engine or in supporting literature about that
particular engine, then the build date shall be reported as MM/15/YY. If the build date cannot be
determined, the null date value shall be reported by leaving the field blank.
$ The number of fuel tanks on the piece of equipment shall be reported in the field equipjn.fueltanks. If
this information is not known, the value "0" shall be entered in mis field.
Attachment 3 - Page: 3
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
$ The equipment's total fuel capacity is recorded to the nearest gallon in the field equip_in.tank_cap.
Fuel capacity is to be determined by the following hierarchy; labeling found directly on the physical
tank(s), OEM service manual, replacement part manual(s), owner's manual, and as a last resort a drain
and fill of all the unit's tank(s). If this information can not be determined, the value "0" shall be entered
in this field.
$ The engine exhaust emission certification family designation shall be recorded in the field
equip_in.eng_fam. If this information can not be determined, the value "NULL" shall be entered in this
field.
$ The engine evaporative emission certification family designation shall be recorded in the field
equip_in.evap_fam. If this information can not be determined, the value "NULL" shall be entered in
this field.
$ The allowable values for the equipment drive train description are found in the field drv_trn.dvr_trn of
the table drv_trn.dbf and are described in the associated field dvr_trn.drv_trn_d. The correct value for
the unit's drive train shall be reported in the field equip_in.drv_tm.. If this information is not known, the
value "NULL" shall be entered in this field.
$ The engine series or product line name shall be entered into the field engine.engseries. If this information
is not known, the value "NULL" shall be entered in this field.
$ An appropriate value for engine service class shall be selected from eng_clas.eng_class and shall be
recorded in the field equip_in.eng_class. If this information is unknown or cannot be determined, the
value "NULL" shall be entered in this field.
$ The engine model year shall be recorded in the field equip_in.eng_mod_yr. If the actual date is not
reported on the engine or in supporting literature about that particular engine, the value "0" shall be
recorded in the field. In general the SI vehicle model_year shall correspond with the engine model
year. That assumption may not hold however with the CI vehicles. If this information is not readily
apparent leave the field blank.
$ The type of aftercooling found on the engine shall be reported in the field equipjn. cooling. If the engine
is not equipped with an aftercooling device, then "NONE" shall be recorded. If it is not known whether
the engine has aftercooling as normally configured, the value "NULL" shall be recorded.
$ The method of fuel injection shall be recorded in the field equip_in.fi_meth The allowable values for
fuel injection method are found in the field fi_met.fi_meth in the table fijneth.dbf and are described in
the field fi_meth.fi_meth_d.. While most diesel engines are covered by the DI and IDI values, the
contractor is encouraged to identify the fuel injection method as specifically as possible. If this
information is unknown or cannot be determined for the test engine, the value "NULL" shall be entered
in this field.
Attachment 3 - Page: 4
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
$ The engine manufacturer-specified fuel injection pressure for the fuel injection system, if present, on the
test engine shall be recorded in the field equip_in.fi_press. If this information is unknown, the value
"NULL" shall be entered in this field.
$ The value "YES" shall be recorded in the field equip_in.except if there is anything which is known to be
or is obviously exceptional about an engine or piece of test equipment which would cause the test unit
to be an outlier in most statistical analyses involving the equipment or engine. Otherwise, the value
"NO" shall be recorded in the equip_in.except field.
$ A brief description of the quality or qualities which would make an engine or piece of test equipment
exceptional shall be entered in the field equip_in.ex_comm. This field is used in conjunction with the
equip_in.except field. Otherwise, the equip_in.ex_comm field shall be left blank.
$ If an engine or piece of test equipment is to be tested with a particulate trap or filter in place, then the
value "YES" shall be recorded in the field equip_in.parttrap otherwise the value "NO" shall be
recorded instead. If this information is unavailable or cannot be determined, then the value "NUL" shall
be entered in the equip_in.parttrap field.
$ The value "4" shall be recorded in the field equip_in.eng_cycl for engines with a four cycle system.
The value "2" shall be recorded for engines with a two cycle system.
$ The engine manufacturer's specified maximum power value (in units of brake-specific horsepower) at
rated engine speed shall be recorded in the field equip_in.ratedpower. If this information is unknown or
cannot be determined from the engine or in supporting literature about that particular engine, the value
"0" shall be recorded in the field.
$ The engine manufacturer's specified rated engine speed (in units of rpm) shall be recorded in the field
equip_in.ratedspeed. If this information is unknown or cannot be determined from the engine or in the
service information about that particular engine, the value "0" shall be recorded in the field.
$ The engine's peak torque shall be reported in foot -pounds into the field equipjn.peaktorque.
$ The engine's speed where peak torque is obtained shall be reported in rpms into the field
equip_in.peakspeed.
$ The engine's fuel rate at peak torque speed in Ibs per hour shall be reported into the field
equip_in.peakfrate.
$ The engine's fuel rate at rated speed in Ibs per hour shall be reported into the field equipjn.ratedfrate.
$ The engine manufacturer's specified engine speed (in units of rpm) for engine idle operation shall be
recorded in the field equip_in.idle_rpm. If this information is unknown or cannot be determined from the
engine or in supporting literature about that particular engine, the value "0" shall be recorded in the field.
Attachment 3 - Page: 5
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
$ If the number of times that the test engine has been rebuilt is known or can be determined, that number
shall be recorded in the field equip_in.rebuild_ct. If this information is unknown or cannot be
determined from the engine or owner/operator, then the null value "99" shall be recorded in the field.
$ The date of the last engine rebuild shall be recorded in the field equip_in.rebuild_dt. If the last rebuild
date cannot be determined or no rebuild has occurred the field shall be left blank.
$ For the last rebuild of the test engine only, if the reason that the test engine was rebuilt is known or can
be determined, then that reason shall be described in the field equipjn.rebuildwhy. If the reason is
unknown or cannot be determined or if the engine has never been rebuilt, then the equip_in.rebuildwhy
field shall be left blank.
$ A brief description of the technical configuration and capabilities, power take-off, power "bulge", etc.,
of the test equipment/engine and shall be recorded in the field equip_in.tech_confg. If this information
cannot be determined for the test equipment/engine or if the relevant information has already been
reported elsewhere in another field, then the equip_in.tech_confg field shall be left blank.
$ A brief description of any electronic interface which may connect the equipment's speed/torque
controls with an engine component which commands torque directly from the engine shall be recorded
in the field equip_in.elec_cont. If this information is unknown or cannot be determined for the test
equipment/engine or if the equipment has no electronic controls, then the equip_in.modifs field shall be
left blank.
$ Any significant post-OEM additions or modifications made to the test equipment/engine shall be
described in the field equip_in.modifs. If this information is unknown or cannot be determined for the
test equipment/engine, then the equip_in.modifs field shall be left blank.
$ The allowable values to categorize a vehicle's transmission are found in the field tran_typ.tran_type.
The correct value for the vehicle shall be reported in the field equip_in.tran_type.
$ The number of fuel injectors per cylinder shall be reported in the field equipjn.injectors. Typical
values are as follows "0" for carbureted engines, "1" for most SI and CI engines, etc.
$ This represents what method, if any, was used to introduce supplemental air into the exhaust stream.
Legal values are found and defined by AIR_INJ translation table. "NO" shall be recorded in the field
equip_in.air_inj when no supplemental air was introduced. Other legal values are listed below:
"YES"-Has air injected
"PUMP" - Air injected by pump
"PULSE" - Air injected by pulse
$ The allowable values to indicate the catalyst control configuration are "YES" or "NO". The correct
value for the vehicle shall be reported in the field equip_in.closedloop. If this information is not known,
the value "NUL" shall be entered in this field.
Attachment 3 - Page: 6
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
$ "SF shall be reported for spark ignition engines and "CF shall be reported for compression ignition in
the field equip_in.ignition.
$ "NUL" shall be recorded in the field equip_in.overdrive.
$ "NUL" shall be recorded in the field equip_in.creeper.
! "NUL" shall be recorded in the field equip_in.lockup.
! "NULL" shall be reported in the field equip_in.gears.
! For the FTP test vehicles, Vehicle Curb weight, (as defined' CFR86.082-2) is the weight of the vehicle
with all fluids at their nominal (full) capacity, including fuel. The value is not the same as the equivalent
test weight. There is, however, an exception for "incomplete" vehicles in the above CFR quote. A
chassis destined to become a camper is an example of such a vehicle. In the case of an "incomplete"
curb weight is specified by the manufacturer. The contractor shall follow the definition where it applies.
In general vehicle curb weight shall be determined by weighing the vehicle and adding an estimated
additional weight that would occur if the vehicle's fuel tanks were full. That value shall be reported in
the field equip_in.curbweight. For computational purposes, the default weight for a gallon of gasoline
fuel shall be 6.1 pounds. "999999" shall be entered into the field equip_in. curb weight for the I/M240
test vehicles.
! If the vehicle has air conditioning "YES" shall be entered into the field equip_in.ac. If the vehicle has no
air conditioning, then "NO" is entered. If you do not known if the vehicle has air conditioning, "NUL"
shall be entered into the field equip_in.ac.
! An appropriate value shall be selected from the field canister.canister and entered into the field
equip_in.canister.
! If there is no exhaust gas recirculation, the value entered in the field equipjn.egr shall be "NO". If the
engine has exhaust gas recirculation, the value shall be "YES". If its is unknown the value entered shall
be "NULL".
! "NULL" shall be reported in the field equip_in.egr_type only if the equipjn.egr field contains either a
"NO" or "NUL". If the engine hasexhaust gas recirculation then either "HOT" for hot air recirculation,
"COOLED" for cool air recirculation shall be reported in the equip_in.egr_type.
! The gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) shall be entered into the field equip_in.gvwr.
! The gross combined weight rating (GCWR) shall be entered into the field equipjn.gcwr.
! The field equipjn.comments shall be used to identify/explain anything a vehicle was rejected from the
test program. Otherwise the fields shall be left blank.
Attachment 3 - Page: 7
-------
Appendix A.1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! The ownership of the vehicle shall be reported into the field equip_in.ownership. The legal values are
either "PRIVATE" - privately owned vehicle; "RENTAL" - rented vehicle; or "GOVT" - owned by
local, state, or federal government.
! Where the vehicle is stored shall be reported into the field equip_in.depot. The legal values shall be
selected from the table site. site.
! The engine's NOx certification standard shall be reported into the field equip_in.cert_nox.
! The engine's PM certification standard shall be reported into the field equip_in.cert_pm.
TEST FUEL BATCHES:
Test fuel properties are stored in the fields of the table fbatjn.dbf Each fuel batch shall if know shall
have its own unique record and is populated as follows;
! The laboratory fuel batch identifier shall be recorded in field fbat_in.fbatch_id.
! If the fuel manufacture has provided the laboratory a unique identifier for the test fuel that shall be
recorded in the field fbat_in.mfg_batch.
! If the test fuel is a fuel oil its centane number as measured by ASTM D 613 shall be recorded in the
field fbat_in.cetane_num, otherwise "0" shall be entered into the field.
! If the test fuel is a fuel oil its centane index as measured by ASTM D 976 shall be recorded in the field
fbat_in.cetane_idx. If it is not the value 0 shall be entered.
! If the centare number was increased by a "cetane improver" the amount of improvement is recorded in
the field fbat_in.cetane_imp. If no cetane improver was use "0"shall be recorded in the field
fbat_in. cetanejmp.
! The name of the "cetane improver", if used shall be recorded in the field fbat_in.cetane_typ. If no
cetane improver was used the "NONE" shall be reported in the field fbat_in.cetane_typ.
! The concentration of sulfur in the test fuel in ppm shall be reported in the field fbatjn. sulfur.
! If an additive was used to increase the amount of sulfur in the test fuel the additive's chemical name shall
be entered into the field fbat_in.sulf_agent.
! The concentration of nitrogen in the test fuel in ppm shall be reported in the field fbat_in.nitrogen. If it is
not known the value "99999" shall be entered into the field.
Attachment 3 - Page:
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
The mass percent of total aromatics as measured by ASTM D 5185 shall be reported in the field
fbat_in.tarom.
The mass percent of mono-cyclic aromatics as measured by ASTM D 5185 shall be reported in the
field fbat_in.marom.
The mass percent of poly-cyclic aromatics as measured by ASTM D 5185 shall be reported in the field
fbat_in.parom.
The test fuel's distillation properties as measured with ASTM D 86 shall be entered into the
appropriate fields of fbat_in.IBP, fbat_in.tlO, fabatch.tSO, fbat_in.t90, fbat_in.ep, fbat_in.residue,
fbat_in.loss, and fbat_in.recovery.
The test fuel's relative density as specific gravity at 60°F shall be entered into the field
fbat_in.spec_grav.
The test fuel's relative density as Degrees API at 60°F shall be entered into the field fbat_in.api^grav.
The test fuel's viscosity in centistokes as measure by ASTM D 455 at 100°F shall be entered into the
field fbatjn.viscosity. If the viscosity is unknown or the fuel is a gasoline the value "0" shall be entered
into the field.
The test fuel's flashpoint in °F and as measured by ASTM D 93 shall be recorded in the field
fbat_in.flash. If it is unknown the value "9999" shall be entered into the field.
The test fuel's pour point in °F and as measured by ASTM D 97 shall be recorded in the field
fbat_in.pour. If it is unknown the value "9999" shall be entered into the field.
The test fuel's hydrogen to carbon ratio on a mole to mole basis shall be reported in the field
fbat_in.hcratio. If the ratio is unknown the value "9.999" shall be entered into the field.
The test fuel's oxygen content on a weight percent basis shall be reported in the field fbat_in.oxygen.
The compound contributing the oxygen on the test fuel shall be reported in the field fbat_in.oxy_type. If
there is no oxygen in the test fuel that "NONE" shall be reported in the field fbat_in.oxy_type.
The weight percent of any additive package added to the fuel, other than cetane improvers, shall be
reported in the field fbat_in.addditives. If the fuel is a gasoline the field shall be left blank.
The test fuel's lubricity in grams and as measured by ASTM D 6078 shall be entered into the field
fbat_in.lubric^g. If it is unknown the value "99999" shall be entered.
Attachment 3 - Page: 9
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
The test fuel's lubricity in millimeters of scar wear and as measured by ASTM D 6079 shall be entered
into the field fbat_in.lubric_mm. If it is unknown the value "9.99" shall be entered.
The test fuel's net heat of combustion in BTUs/pound of fuel shall be reported in the field fbatjn.heat.
If the fuel is a diesel fuel, the test fuel's ash expressed in weight percent and as measured by ASTM D
482 shall be reported in the field fbatjn.ash.
"0" shall be recorded in the field fbat_in.mon and fbat_in.ron fi the fuel is a diesel fuel. If the fuel is a
gasoline the motor octane will be entered in the former and the research octane shall be entered in the
latter.
If the fuel is a gasoline the its RVP shall be recorded in the field fbat_in.rvp. If it is a diesel fuel the
value "99.9" shall be entered.
The grams of carbon per pound of test fuel in dry air shall be reported in the field fbat_in.fen_c.
The weight fraction carbon of the test fuel shall be reported in the field fbat_in.wgt_fractn.
The aromatic content of the test fuel in volume percent and as measured by ASTM D 1319 shall be
reported in the field fbat_in.comp_aroma.
The olefin content of the test fuel in volume percent and as measured by ASTM D 1319 shall be
reported in the field fbat_in.comp_olefn.
The saturate content of the test fuel in volume percent and as measured by ASTM D 1319 shall be
reported in the field fbat_in.comp_sat.
If the test fuel is the certification gasoline "60" shall be reported in the field fbat_in.fuel_id. If the test
fuel is the certification diesel fuel "96" shall be reported in the field fbat_in.fuel_id. If the fuel is tank
fuel the field dyno_in.fuel_id shall be "0".
"KC_PM' shall be entered in the field equip_in.wa_id.
The cloud measurement of the test fuel shall be reportin the field fbatjn.cloud.
FTP LABORATORY TESTING: The FTP shall be run as a three phase test. The laboratory test level
information shall be reported in the table structure headed by dyno_in.dbf for laboratory values and are
to be populated for the tests as follows:
Attachment 3 - Page: 10
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
The laboratory test identifier shall be recorded in field dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
"FTP" shall be reported in the field dyno_in.test_proc.
"KC_PM" shall be entered into the field dyno_in.wa_id.
"FTP" shall be reported in the field dyno_in.sched_id.
The initial FTP shall have the value .F. entered into the field dyno_in.replicate. The second FTP for the
test vehicles shall have the value .T. entered into the field dyno_in.replicate.
If the test fuel is the certification gasoline "60" shall be reported in the field dyno_in.fuel_id. If the test
fuel is the certification diesel fuel "96" shall be reported in the field dyno_in.fuel_id. If the fuel is tank
fuel the field dyno_in.fuel_id shall be "0".
The value entered into equip_in.veh_ms_id for this vehicle shall be reported in the field dyno_in.ms_id.
The test date and time of day shall be reported into the fields dyno_in.test_date and dyno_in.test_tod
respectively following the format specified for them.
"ANNARBOR" shall be reported in the field dyno_in.site if tests were performed in Michigan. If test
were performed in Kansas City then "KANSASCITY " shall be reported.
75 °F shall be reported in the field dyno_in.nom_temp.
50 grains of water per pound of dry air at 60 °F shall be reported in the field dyno_in.nom_humid.
"0" shall be entered into the field dynojn.disable.
FTP composite emissions (' 86.144-90) for THC, CO, NOx, and CO2 shall be reported in the fields
dyno_in.thc, dyno_in.co, dyno_in.co2, and dyno_in.nox.
FTP composite fuel economy in miles per gallon shall be entered into the field dyno_in.mpg.
The vehicle's ETW shall be entered into the field dyno_in.testwght.
The dynamometer's indicated road load horse power at 50 miles per hour shall be entered into the field
dyno_in.road_hp.
"NO" shall be entered into the field dyno_in.ac_hp.
Attachment 3 - Page: 11
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! An appropriate value shall be selected from the dynotype.dynotype and shall be entered into the field
dyno_in.dynotype.
! The vehicle's odometer reading at the start of the test shall be entered into the field dyno_in. odometer.
! The appropriate value to represent the tests preconditioning be selected from the field precond.precond
and shall be reported in the field dynojn.precond.
! The ambient temperature in degrees F at the start of the test shall reported in the field dyno_in.int_temp.
! The barometric pressure in inches of mercury at the start of the test shall be entered into the field
dyno_in.init_baro.
! The humidity in grains of water per pound of dry air at the start of the test shall entered into the field
dyno_in.init_humid.
The field dynobjn.resultgrp shall be left blank.
FTP composite emissions (' 86.144-90) for methane shall be reported in the table format tmeas_in.dbf The
fields shall be populated as follows:
! "METHANE" shall be reported as tmeas_in.meas_id if being measured.
! The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field tmeas_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
i
The composite methane emissions in grams per mile shall be reported in the field tmeas_in.measure.
FTP dynamometer brake horse power hours shall be reported in the table format tmeas_in.dbf The fields shall
be populated as follows:
! "BHPH" shall be reported as tmeas_in.meas_id.
! The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field tmeas_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
! The amount of work performed by the vehicle ,as measured by the dynamometer for the entire test shall
be reported in the field tmeas_in.measure in units of brake horsepower hours.
For SI vehicles the test level total particulate ('86.110-90) shall be reported in the table format
tmeas_in.dbf The fields shall be populated as follows:
Attachment 3 - Page: 12
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! "PMT_CFR110" shall be reported as tmeas_in.meas_id.
! The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field tmeas_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dynob_in.ctr_tst_id.
! Test level emissions in milligrams per mile for the particulate emissions shall be reported in the field
tmeas_in.measure.
Bag (phase) level test data shall be reported for laboratory values in the table format bag_in.dbf where
the fields shall be populated as follows:
! The bag (phase) number, "1" , "2" or "3" shall be reported in the field bag_in.bag_num.
! The laboratory test id used for the test level information shall be reported in bag_in.ctr_tst_id and the
same as that in dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
The average barometric pressure in inches of mercury shall be reported in the field bag_in.bag_baro.
The average test cell temperature in degrees F shall be reported in the field bag_in.bag_temp.
The average test cell humidity in grains of water per pound of dry air at 60 °F shall be reported in the
field bag_in.bag_humid.
The total simulated distance traveled by the vehicle per phase in miles shall be reported in the field
bag_in.bag_dist.
Total hydrocarbon shall be reported as grams per mile in the field bag_in.bag_thc.
Carbon monoxide shall be reported as grams per mile in the field bag_in.bag_co.
Carbon dioxide shall be reported as grams per mile in the field bag_in.bag_co2.
Oxides of nitrogen shall be reported as grams per mile in the field bag_in.bag_nox.
The vehicle's fuel consumption in miles per gallon per phase shall be reported in the field
bag_in.bag_mpg.
The phase (bag) level methane emissions shall be reported in the table format bmeasjn.dbf The fields
shall be populated as follows:
! The phase (bag) number shall be reported in the field bmeas_in.bag_num.
Attachment 3 - Page: 13
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! "METHANE" shall be reported as bmeas_in.meas_id if measured.
! The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field bmeas_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
! The phase (bag) methane emissions in grams per mile shall be reported in the field bmeas_in.measure.
The phase (bag) level amount of work exerted by the dyno in brake horsepower hour emissions shall be
reported in the table format bmeasjn.dbf The fields shall be populated as follows:
The phase (bag) number shall be reported in the field bmeas_in.bag_num.
"BHPH" shall be reported as bmeas_in.meas_id.
The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field bmeas_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
! The phase (bag) work performed by the dynamometer in brake horsepower hour shall be reported in
the field bmeasjn.measure.
For SI vehicles the phase (bag) level total particulate ('86.110-90) shall be reported in the table format
bmeas_in.dbf The fields shall be populated as follows:
The phase (bag) number shall be reported in the field bmeas_in.bag_num.
"PMT_CFR110" shall be reported as bmeas_in.meas_id.
The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field bmeas_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dynob_in.ctr_tst_id.
! Test level emissions in milligrams per mile for the particulate emissions shall be reported in the field
bmeasjn.measure.
Second by second emission data for the laboratory test measurement shall be reported in the table format
timeJn.dbf where the fields shall be populated as follows:
i
The accumulated test time in seconds shall be reported in the field timejn.dynosecs.
! The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field time_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
Attachment 3 - Page: 14
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
The average speed for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in miles per hour in the
field time_in. speed.
The simulated distance traveled by the vehicle for the measured unit of time (1 second) in miles shall be
reported in the field timejn.dist.
Total hydrocarbon for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in
the field time_in.r_thc.
Carbon monoxide for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in the
field time_in.r_co.
Oxides of nitrogen for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in the
field time_in.r_nox.
Carbon dioxide for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in the
field time_in.r_co2.
Total hydrocarbon accumulated to this time in grams shall be reported in the field time_in.w_thc.
Carbon monoxide accumulated to this time in grams shall be reported in the field time_in.w_co.
Oxides of nitrogen accumulated to this time in grams shall be reported in the field time_in.w_nox.
Carbon dioxide accumulated to this time in grams shall be reported in the field time_in.w_co2.
The phase number shall be reported in the field time_in.test_phase.
The second by second level amount of work exerted by the dyno in brake horsepower hour emissions
shall be reported in the table format rmeasjn.dbf The fields shall be populated as follows:
The accumulated test time in seconds shall be reported in the field rmeasjn.dynosecs.
"BHPH" shall be reported as rmeas_in.meas_id.
The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field rmeas_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
dyno_in.ctr_tst_id.
The phase (bag) work performed by the dynamometer in brake horsepower hour shall be reported in
the field bmeas_in.rep_meas.
Attachment 3 - Page: 15
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
FTP PEMS TESTING:
The test level information shall be reported in the table format road_in.dbf for PEMS values and are to
populated for the as follows:
! The laboratory test identifier shall be recorded in field road_in.ctr_tst_id. This must be different from
that used in the laboratory delivery tables and unique overall.
"DROVE" shall be reported in the field road_in.test_proc.
"KC_PM' shall be entered into the field road_in.wa_id.
The initial FTP shall have the value .F. entered into the field road_in.replicate. The second FTP for the
test vehicles shall have the value .T. entered into the field road_in.replicate.
The same value use to populate the field dynob_in.fuel shall be used to populate the field road_in.fuel.
The value entered into equip_in.veh_ms_id for this vehicle shall be reported in the field road_in.ms_id
The test date and time of day shall be reported into the fields road_in.test_date and road_in.test_tod
respectively.
"0" shall be entered into the field road_in.disable.
AFTP" shall be reported in the field road_in.route.
A unique identifier for the specific version and model of SEMTECH shall be entered into the field
road_in.instrsys.
The vehicle's ETW shall be entered into the field road_in.actweight.
The average ambient temperature in degrees F shall be reported in the field road_in.avg_temp.
The average humidity in of water per pound of dry air at 60 °F shall be reported in the field
road_in.avg_humid.
The average barometric pressure in inches of mercury shall be reported in the field road_in.avg_baro.
The vehicle's odometer reading at the start of the test shall be entered into the field road_in. odometer.
The appropriate value, selected from precond.precond, to represent the tests preconditioning shall be
reported in the table road_in.precond.
Attachment 3 - Page: 16
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
Total test time in minutes, including the ten minute soak shall be entered into the field
road_in.timeonroad.
The total test distance in miles for the FTP shall be entered in to the field roadjn.distance.
The total work performed by the engine, calculated by SEMTECH, and in brake horsepower hours
shall be entered into the field roadjn.totalwork.
"0" shall be entered into the field road_in.gallons.
The phase emissions in grams for THC shall be reported in the field road_in.w_thc.
The phase emissions in grams for CO shall be reported in the field road_in.w_co.
The phase emissions in grams for CO2 shall be reported as in the field road_in.w_co2.
The phase emissions in grams for O2 shall be reported as in the field road_in.w_o2.
The phase emissions in grams for NOX shall be reported as in the field road_in.w_no.
Bag (phase) level test data shall be reported for SEMTECH values in the table format phase_in.dbf
where the fields shall be populated as follows:
! The laboratory test identifier shall be recorded in field phase_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
road_in. ctr_tst_id.
The bag (phase) number, "1" , A2" or A3" shall be entered into the field phase_in.phase_no.
The average ambient temperature in degrees F shall be reported in the field phase_in.avg_temp.
The average humidity in of water per pound of dry air at 60 °F shall be reported in the field
phasejn. avg_humid.
The average barometric pressure in inches of mercury shall be reported in the field phase_in.avg_baro.
Total test time in minutes, including the ten minute soak shall be entered into the field
phase_in.timeonroad.
The total test distance in miles for the FTP shall be entered in to the field phasejn.distance.
The total work performed by the engine, as calculated by SEMTECH, and in brake horsepower hour
shall be entered into the field phasejn.totalwork.
Attachment 3 - Page: 17
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
The gallons of fuels for this phase shall be entered into the field phasejn.gallons.
The phase emissions in grams for THC shall be reported in the field phase_in.w_thc.
The phase emissions in grams for CO shall be reported in the field phase_in.w_co.
The phase emissions in grams for CO2 shall be reported as in the field phase_in.w_co2.
The phase emissions in grams for O2 shall be reported as in the field phase_in.w_o2.
The phase emissions in grams for NOX shall be reported as in the field phase_in.w_no.
The start emissions shall be reported as "YES" in the field phase_in.start_emis for phase 1 and 3. The
start emissions shall be reported as "NO" in the field phase_in.start_emis for phase 2.
! AAMBT" shall be reported in the field phase_in.veh_state for phase 1, AOPERA" shall be reported in
the field phase_in.veh_state for phase 2, and ATRANS" shall be reported in the field
phase_in.veh_state for phase 3.
Second by second emission data for the SEMTECH shall be reported in the table format rtime_in.dbf
where the fields shall be populated as follows:
! The laboratory test id shall be reported in the field rtime_in.ctr_tst_id and the same as that in
road_in. ctr_tst_id.
The accumulated test time in seconds shall be reported in the field rtime_in.roadsecs.
The phase number shall be reported in the field rtime_in.phase_no.
The average vehicle speed for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in miles per hour
in the field rtime_in.roadspeed.
The average engine vehicle speed for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in rpm in
the field rtime_in.enginerpm.
The average engine torque for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in foot pounds in
the field rtime_in.roadtorque.
The average ambient temperature for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in degrees
F in the field rtime_in.roadtemp.
Attachment 3 - Page: l:
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! Total hydrocarbon for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in
the field rtime_in.r_thc.
! Carbon monoxide for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in the
field rtime_in.r_co.
! Oxides of Nitrogen for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in
the field rtime_in.r_no.
! Carbon dioxide for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in the
field time_in.r_co2.
! Oxygen for the measured unit of time (1 second) shall be reported in grams per second in the field
rtime_in.r_o2.
LA92 - LABORATORY TESTING: The LA92 shall be run as a three phase test. The test level
information shall be reported as the same as the FTP data in the table format dyno_in.dbf for laboratory
values except that;
! "LA92" shall be reported in the field dyno_in.test_proc.
! The appropriate value for the preconditioning, "505HS", "LA4" or "FTP", shall be reported in the
field dynojn.precond depending on if any preconditioning was performed to keep the vehicle "fully
warmed."
! The LA92 is a three phase (bag) test with physical bags, therefore the test level emissions and the
phase (bag) level emissions for THC, CO, NOx, and CO2 are equivalent and shall be reported the
same in dyno_in.dbf and bag_in.dbf respectively. "1, 2 or 3" shall be reported in the field
bag_in.bag_num.
! Second-by-second data shall be reported the same as for an FTP.
LA92 - SEMTECH TESTING:
The test level information shall be reported in the table format road_in.dbf for SEMTECH values and
are same as the FTP data except that;
! "LA92" shall be reported in the field road_in.route.
! The total test distance in miles for the LA92 shall be entered in to the field road_in.distance.
! The road_in.gallons value shall be the same value entered into the field phasejn.gallons.
Attachment 3 - Page: 19
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! LA92 emissions in grams for THC in the field road_in.w_thc shall be reported the same as the
emissions reported in phase_in.w_thc.
! LA92 emissions in grams for CO in the field road_in.w_co shall be reported the same as the emissions
reported in phase_in.w_co.
! LA92 emissions in grams for CO2 in the field road_in.w_co2 shall be reported the same as the
emissions reported in phase_in.w_co2.
! LA92 emissions in grams for O2 in the field road_in.w_o2 shall be reported the same as the emissions
reported in phase_in.w_o2.
! LA92 emissions in grams for NOx in the field road_in.w_no shall be reported the same as the
emissions reported in phase_in.w_no.
The bag(phase) level test data shall be reported in the table format phasejn.dbf for SEMTECH values
and are same as the FTP data except that;
! The bag (phase) number shall be "1" shall be reported in the field phase_in.bag_num.
! The start emissions shall be reported as "NO" in the field phase_in.start_emis.
! "OPERA" shall be reported in the field phase_in.veh_state.
SEMTECH FIELD DATA
The field data for all the light duty vehicles are recorded and the same manner as in the laboratory. To
capture the length of time the vehicle is sampled the table actty_in.dbf is populated in the following
manner;
! The sampling period shall be identified by the contractor by a unique character string in the field
actty_in.ctr_tst_id.
"KC_PM" shall be entered into the field actty_in.wa_id.
The value entered in equip_in.veh_ms_id for this vehicle is entered into the field actty_in.ms_id
The date and time of the installation is entered into the field actty_in.install_dt.
Attachment 3 - Page: 20
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! If the vehicle has an hour meter it's value shall be entered into the field actty_in.install_hrm.
! If this vehicle has been sampled before under the same procurement the field acttyjn.replicate shall be
>.T.'. Otherwise the field shall be marked as >.F.'
! If the odometer reading at the time of the installation shall be entered into the field actty_in.instal_odm.
! At the end of the sample period the data and time shall be entered into the field actty_in.unstall_dt, the
odometer reading inactty_in.unstal_odm, and the hour meter reader in the the fieldactty_in.unstl_hrm.
The sample shall capture the concept of trips, which are periods between engine on and engine off
where the engine is running. That data shall be captured in the table trip_in.dbf and populated as
follows;
! A unique identifier for each trip shall be entered into the field trip_in.ctr_tst_id.
! The value of the trips associated sample with the shall be captured by recording its actty_in.ctr_tst_id in
trip_in.activityid.
! A gross fuel identifier that is appropriate from the fuel.fueHd shall be entered into the field
trip_in.fuel_id.
! If fuel analysis information is available the fuel batch identifier for the fuel analysis data captured in the
table fbat_in.dbf is entered into the field trip_in.fbatch_id.
The date and time of the beginning of the trip shall be recorded in the field trip_in.tstart_dt.
The date and time of the end of the trip shall be recorded in the field trip_in.tend_dt.
A unique identifier of the vehicle operator shall be entered into the field tripjn.operatortp.
Any change in the instrument configuration done for this trip shall be done so with a unique instrument
configuration character string in the field trip_in.ins_config.
! An estimate of vehicle load in passengers in the case of motor vehicle shall be recorded in the field
trip_in.passengers.
! An estimate of the vehicle's payload including passengers and cargo shall be estimated to the nearest
pound in the fiel trip_in.payload.
The second by second data shall be captured in the table rtime_in.dbf and shall be populated as follows;
Attachment 3 - Page: 21
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
The value of the trip_in.ctr_tst_id shall be entered into the field rtime_in.ctr_tst_id.
The value of the trips associated sample shall be captured by recording its rtime_in.ctr_tst_id in
tripjn.activityid.
The running sequential time in seconds shall be recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_secs.
The one second average vehicle speed in miles per hour for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be
recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_speed.
The one second average engine speed in rpm for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in
the field rtime_in.trip_rpm.
The one second average engine torque in foot pounds for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be
recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_torq.
The one second average engine torque in foot pounds for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be
recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_torq.
The one second average ambient air temperature in degrees F for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs
shall be recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_tempf
The one second average ambient air temperature in degrees C for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs
shall be recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_temp.
The one second average barometer in inches of mercury for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be
recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_baro.
The one second average barometer in kPa for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in
the field rtime_in.inst_baro.
The one second average humidity in grains of water per pound of dry air for the associated
rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_humid.
The one second average latitude in degrees for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in
the field rtime_in.trip_lat.
The one second average longitude in degrees for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in
the field rtime_in.trip_long.
The one second average altitude in feet for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in the
field rtime_in.trip_alt.
Attachment 3 - Page: 22
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
! The one second average grade in percent for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in the
field rtime_in.trip_grade.
! The one second average mass air flow thru the vehicle's engine in standard cubic feet per second for
the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be recorded in the field rtime_in.trip_massf
! The one second engine fuel rate in pounds per second for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be
recorded in the field rtime_in.fuel_rate.
! The one second the, co, nox, and oxygen emission in grams for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall
be recorded in the fields rtime_in.trip_thc, rtime_in.trip_co, rtime_in.trip_co2, rtime_in.trip_nox, and
rtime_in.trip_o2.
! The one second engine coolant temperature in degrees F for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be
recorded in the field rtime_in.eng_cool.
! The one second engine oil temperature in degrees F for the associated rtime_in.trip_secs shall be
recorded in the field rtime_in.eng_oil.
Non-core measurements at the second-by second level are recorded in the table pmeas_in.dbf They are
recorded by entering into each record;
i
The value of the trip_in.ctr_tst_id shall be entered into the field pmeas_in.ctr_tst_id.
! The value of the trips associated sample shall be captured by recording its pmeas_in.ctr_tst_id in
trip_in.activityid.
i
The running sequential time in seconds shall be recorded in the field pmeas_in.trip_secs.
The associated value for pmeas_in.meas_id for the various analytes measured on a second by second
basis are found in the attached table:
Measurement meas_id Units
AC Compressor On or off ac_on_off None
AC Load acjoad watts
Throttle Position throttle_p percent
Exhaust Temperature (degrees F) exh_temp Degrees F
Attachment 3 - Page: 23
-------
Appendix A. 1
Mobile Source Observation Data Entry Instructions
for Kansas City PM Vehicle Testing
Intake Manifold Pressure intakejnfp Inches of Mercury
Transmission Gear trans_gear None
The measurements themselves shall be stored in the field pmeas_in.meas_value. The ac compressor
status shall be characterizes as "0" as off and "1" as on. The transmission gear shall be characterized
by -1 for reverse, 0 for neutral, 1, 2,3 etc for forward gears.
Attachment 3 - Page: 24
-------
Appendix B
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Appendix B Sample Size Estimation
As mentioned in the proposal, the sample size was derived in three steps, as described below.
1. Estimate initial sample size («SRS). The initial sample size was calculated under the following
assumptions:
The sample will be large enough that large sample theory applies, i.e., the sampling distribution of the
mean(s) will be approximately normal.
Vehicles would be drawn from the population using simple random sampling (SRS).
The objective is to estimate the fleet average PM emissions rate (g/mi), to within 20% margin of error (E) at
a 95% level of confidence (associated ^-statistic is 1.96).
The population variance is estimated by a coefficient of variation (CV) of 250%. This value is intended to
be conservative, adopted from a study in Denver that included winter as well as summer measurements in a
sample heavily weighted towards older vehicles.
The initial estimate is thus calculated as:
SRS
CV2 -t2
E2
2.52-1.962
0.202
1. Estimate the effective sample size («strat). The effective sample size reflects the expected gain in precision
from use of the age-by-vehicle-class stratification. It is calculated as
Wstrat = «SRS • deff , where
2
J fp 5mean,Strat 0.7000 A no
^mean, SRS
0.9014
This result suggests that the proposed stratified sampling should allow us to achieve the stated precision
objective with -20% fewer vehicles than we would expect using SRS, i.e., with 480 as opposed to 600
vehicles. The "design effect" (deff) represents the reduction in the variance of the mean achieved
through stratification. Note that variances in the equation are the estimated variances of the sampling
distribution of the mean, not the population variance. For this analysis, the estimated variances were
calculated using a set of data collected in the SCAQMD (Norbeck et al. 1998). The data used
represent a subset of vehicles identified as "normal" emitters, as these vehicles were recruited randomly
in the context of the NCHRP. Thus, we assume that these vehicles give a rough indication of the relative
sizes of the age-class and vehicle-class strata, as defined in Tables 1 and 2 below.
Attachment 4 - Page: 1
-------
Appendix B
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Our estimated variance of the mean under SRS assumptions is simply the estimated population variance
divided by the total sample size, or
where the estimated population variance is calculated using the available data but disregarding the age
classes under which it was collected. We estimate variance of the mean under stratification (s2mean,strat)
by calculating a weighted variance from the variances of the mean in each stratum h (s2mem /,), as follows
(Kish, 1965)1:
s2
mean,strat
6 ( ^
- 2X2(^J
6
= ix2
h=\
mean,/;
The stratum weight Wh is intended to serve as an estimate of the relative size of the stratum, and is this
case was calculated as number of observations in each stratum from the SCAQMD dataset, here
denoted as mh.
mt
Allocate the Effective Sample among Strata. To divide the proposed sample among the six strata, again
using the observations from the SCAQMD data (mh) as a guide. We have used Neyman allocation, which
assigns sub-samples based on the product of the stratum size mh and stratum standard deviation sh. This
allocation is designed to optimize the resulting precision for the given total sample size. The optimal sample
within each stratum nh;0pt is given as
A, opt strat
( A
Shmh
6
T,Shmh
\h=l )
1 Kish, L. (1965) . Surrey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, New
York.
Attachment 4 - Page: 2
-------
Appendix B
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Finally, the raw optimal stratum samples were rounded and adjusted slightly to reduce larger differences
between strata given by the optimization. Final adjusted stratum samples are denoted as nh>adj and
presented in Table 2.
Table 1. Definition of Strata by Vehicle and Age Class
:um (h)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Vehicle Class
Truck1
Truck
Truck
Car2
Car
Car
Age Class3
Pre 1981
1981-1990"
1991 and newer
Pre 1981
1981-1990"
1991 and newer
1 Includes LDGT1 and LDGT2 vehicle classes.
2 Includes LDGV vehicle classes.
3 Following Norbeck et al. (1998) and Cadle et al. (1999).
" Authors designated two strata, 1981-85 and 1986-90. These were collapsed, due to a
close similarity in mean PM rates.
Table 2 Estimated Sample Size and Allocation Among Age and Vehicle-Class Strata
Stratum
mean
Varianc
e
S C
t V
V SE
a (*„,»)
r
Wh
Allocation
«».„,,,
D
e
v
m
e
a
n
2 30.34
15 9.30
556.95
165.66
2 0
6 .
. 7
3 8
0
1 1
2 .
16.69
3.32
0.0222 40.52
50
0.167 165.78
140
Attachment 4 - Page: 3
-------
Appendix B
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
8
7
3 22 3.15 9.59 3
1
0
4 2 25.00 482.34 2
1
9
6
5 15 3.22 10.56 3
2
5
6 34 1.93 21.58 4
6
5
3
8
0
9
8
0
8
8
1
0
1
2
4
1
0
4
0 0.66 0.244 58.50 70
4
4
2 15.53 0.0222 37.72 40
4
1
1
7
0 0.84 0.167 41.86 50
7
0
0 0.80 0.378 135.62 130
6
3
2
1
4
6
8
3
1
0
4
2
7
1
Total 90 480
Notation:
Std. Dev. = Standard Deviation
CV = Coefficient of variation, defined as Std. Dev./mean.
Var(mean) = Variance of the sampling distribution of the mean, = variance/w for each stratum.
SE = Standard Error of the mean, defined as SE/Vw.
W = stratum weight, defined as w/Zw, for each stratum.
n h opt = raw sub-sample in each stratum as assigned by Neyman allocation.
n h ,dj = rounded sub-sample in each stratum.
Attachment 4 - Page: 4
-------
Appendix C
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104 Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Attachment 5 - Page: 1
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Annendice D - OTA'
Instrument
Diesel Particulate
Monitor (DPM), Model
1105A
DPM Computer and
Monitor
Dewpoint Generator,
Model DG-1, Plus
auxiliary Equipment:
Hot Plate, Model 1103
Dewpoint Monitor,
Model Ml 70
Real Time Particulate
Mass Monitor, Model
RPM-101
DataRam 4000
Portable Emission
Measurement Systems
(PEMS)
Manufacturer
Rupprecht &
Pataschnick Co.,
Inc.
?
Sable Systems,
Inc.
Jenway
Visala
Booker Systems,
Ltd.
Thermo- MCE Inc.
Sensors, Inc.
Semtech - D - 2
Semtech - G - 6
^r's Governmeii
EPA
ID
792787
79278
7-2
79278
7-3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a yet
793003
n/a yet
t Furnished Pronertv Lis
S/N
1105A201479907
032333021
H051J7000434
DG0101-03
1248
X3550014
n/a
D055
t
Cost
$39,647 with
computer
See DPM
$4,290
$ 895
$2,495
$53,000
$10,550
$25,000 - $40,000
depending on model
type
Attachment 6 - Page: 1
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Three Light-Duty
Vehicles for Round
Robin Testing
Portable Activity
Measurement Systems
(PAMS)
Various
Manufacturers
approximately 10
units
n/ayet
n/ayet
$5,000 - $20,000
depending on model
$3 00 per unit
Auxiliaries
KT1 Plus Compressor
Heated Sample Valve
System
Valve Control System
Heated Lines and
Controllers
Kaeser
Burkert
EPA
Unique Products
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$2,500
$4,500
$1,200
$12,000
n/a - Not Assigned
Attachment 6 - Page: 2
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Appenidces D - ORD's Government Furnished Property (Dynamometer and Other Equipment)
Item
Trailer
Instrument rack,
(42"x71"x28")
CO2 Instrument
CO(H) Instrument
Nox Instrument
Hydrocarbon
Instrument
Hydrocarbon
Instrument
Hydrocarbon
Instrument
CO Instrument,
optical
CO Instrument,
electronics
Digital Meter
Manufacturer
Haulmark
Horiba
Horiba
Horiba
Horiba
Horiba
Horiba
Horiba
Horiba
LFE
Model #
G816B3-102
AIA-210
AIA-210
CLA220
FIA236
FIA34A
OPE435
AIA23AS
OPE135
Serial (ID) #
4XSGB1629Y
G022365
569687041
56884301
573834033
850624012
850584012
850658077
850988014
850658014
EPA#
911710
911711
969210
Attachment 6 - Page: 3
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Meter, temperature
Meter, temperature
Meter, temperature
2 Meters, digital
Meter, digital
Pressure Transducer
Temperature
Controller
Temperature
Controller
Computer
Monitor
Computer mouse
Printer
Keyboard
Monitor
Instrument Rack
(24"x24"x74")
Omega
Omega
Omega
Newport
Cole-Parmer
Data
Instruments
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Mitsuba
Dell
Kentronix
Hewitt Packard
Chicony
Axion
DP205TC
DP205TC
DP205TC
2AP2
7350-38
SA
223-1531
223-1531
1239933
D1028L
DeskJet 932C
KB5181
CL-1566
3081342
3081329
17524-17-1287
3488-0017
6336
n/a
66746JA56K
10017631
NXOC61SOHZ
TCK3C08137
CB266AS0074
4
928752
Attachment 6 - Page: 4
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Heated Line
Temperature
Controller
Temperature
Controller
Refrigerator
Chair
Chair
VGA distribution
amplifier
Headphones
Headphones
Headphones
Readout box
Mass Flow
Controller
Instrument Rack
(74"x24"x24")
Monitor
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Whirlpool
Extron
David Clark Co.
David Clark Co.
David Clark Co.
Tylan
Tylan
Mitsuba
223-1531
EL05CCXJW
P/2 DA2 Plus
H5030
H5040
H5030
R032
FC280
CM43
S11B4240TM
AA1
4878
EE0218193
249005
12511G-01
16298G-03
FP901021
AW801070
353JROOOUOO
644
Attachment 6 - Page: 5
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Drivers Aid
Computer
Digital Readout
box
Mass Flow
Controller
Mass Flow
Controller
Mass Flow
Controller
Mass Flow
Controller
Keyboard
Rack Power Strip
Rack Power Strip
Instrument manuals
in 3-ring binder
Winch, electric
Regulator, gas
Horiba SADA
2040
Hewlett Packard
Tylan
Tylan
Tylan
Tylan
Tylan
Qtronix
Flexiduct
Flexiduct
Dayton
National
Welders
270188
VL2
R028
FC280
FC280
FC280
FC280
QX901
BR06010
SP12410
4Z327A
3104C
9443501
3436A00341
F0604019
AW801200
AW801201
AW805124
AW507001
903000755
NXX300120
BXX300022
911694
Attachment 6 - Page: 6
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Regulator, gas
Regulator, gas
Regulator, gas
Regulator, gas
Regulator, gas
Regulator, gas
Regulator, gas
Bag Rack w/ 8
Tedlar bags
Air Pump
Air Pump
Air Pump
Air Pump
Air Pump
National
Welders
National
Welders
National
Welders
Nox 660
National
Welders
National
Welders
National
Welders
Horiba
Metal Bellows
Thomas
Gast
Gast
Gast
HPT270C
HPT270-125-
590-DK
HPT2700
HPT272C
GPT2700
HPT270C
MB-21
1107CM75
0523-V191Q-
G582DX
0523-V191Q-
G582DX
0523-V191Q-
G588DX
A2 17254
E227323
KY37784
GA33049
FZ13512
10545
0000187
9802803610
9812011058
1002119130
Attachment 6 - Page: 7
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Air Pump
Air Pump
Air Pump
Relay and Solenoid
Rack
Temperature
Controller
Temperature
Controller
Temperature
Controller
Heated Line, 20' x
1/4"
Heated Line, 20' x
1/4"
Heated Line, 20' x
1/4"
Heated Line, 50' x
3/8"
Heated Filter
Heated Filter (on
order)
Thomas
Thomas
Thomas
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
Unique
Products
607CA22
607CA22
607CA22
223-2219
223-22 19J
223-1531
FLT1584BB6
AAJ-000
13202
7813
4748
13203
Attachment 6 - Page:
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Cyclone, ss (on
order)
Cyclone, ss (on
order)
(2) Power Cables,
50'
Condenser
(2) Winches
Miscellaneous tools
Miscellaneous
office supplies
Miscellaneous
electrical supplies
Miscellaneous
tubing
Miscellaneous
swaglock fittings
Miscellaneous
hardware
Space heater
Miscellaneous
padlocks
URG
URG
Tecumsek
Dayton
240V, 50 amp
AE3Y14AA
4Z327A
9A1768096
Attachment 6 - Page: 9
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Item
Trailer
Air Cooler
Air Compressor
Air Compressor
Motor
Positive
Displacement Pump
(PDF)
PDF Motor
Dynamometer
(Electronic
controller, rolls, and
flywheels
1- carpenter's level,
4'
15- trailer jack
stands
Weight calibration
set, 451b.,10 Ib. and
arbor
5 pieces of 18"
chain
Manufacturer
Fruehauf
Dayton
Suterbilt
GE MOTORS
Clayton
Model #
C6HE-Y2
C810B
2800061DUAO
01
6K827L
5-LP
5KC184BB21
1
CTE-50
Serial (ID) #
DLR503307
12936
45929NSO423
02
C63GKE-
4555J977
5085736
NPY300
RLC-175
EPA#
807534
807535
Attachment 6 - Page: 10
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
2 Ramps, aluminum
(8'xl2')
Fan
Fan motor
Muffler
4 Aluminum ramps
(7.5' x 18")
Aluminum ramp
(2'xl2')
8" OD Tunnel,
stainless steel, 10'
and 12' sections
Flexible tube,
3"xl4' braided,
stainless steel
4" OD Tunnel,
stainless steel
sections, total ~ 8'
Flexible tube (4"x4'
)
Filter housing (2'x2'
aluminum)
Hartzell
Reliance
Burgess
Manning
Metro Trailer
Manuf.
CS
BEO-3.5
C56E1768M-
DZ
52-170-0
Attachment 6 - Page: 11
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
Tube elbow,
stainless steel
(8"x24")
Winch
Winch post, 6'
aluminum
Water pump
Floor Jack
(6) Dilution tunnel
support stands
(2) Jack stands for
ramps
Dilution air heater
Steel Toolbox,
36"xl8"xl8"
(4) Metal Leg
stands
(26) silicon boots,
11"
(5) Nylon, rachet
style tie-down
straps
Wire cable with
hooks, 8'
Dayton
Unique
Products
Payload
6X1 90B
FP6121-00
507574
X1059057
1E95B
8014
Attachment 6 - Page: 12
-------
Appendix D
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
(5) 2000 Ib chain
binders
(1) 5400 Ib chain
binder
Nustar Power
Pusher
(6) Straps, load
binder
44518
933311
Attachment 6 - Page: 13
-------
Task Order Line Items
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
rr TN
BASE
0001 A
0001 B
0001 C
0001 D
OPTION
1
0002 A
0002 B
0002 C
0002 D
0002 E
0002 F
0002 G
0002 H
00021
OPTION
2
0003
OPTION
3
0004 A
0004 B
0004 C
0004 D
0004 E
0004 F
0004 G
0004 H
SCFNARTO A- DFSr'RTPTTON
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PHASE 1 PILOT STUDIES
Produce Quality Documentation (SOW Section 5.1)
Pre-Testing Analysis, Non-Response Analysis, Vehicle Pilot Study
(Cohort Analysis) (SOW Sections 5.2.1 through 5.2.6, and 5.2.8)
Pilot Testing Task (SOW Section 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.4.2)
Contract Incentive Plan
PHASE 2: ROUND 1 VEHICLE TESTING
Vehicle Recruitment (SOW Section 5.2.7a)
Participation Incentives (SOW Section 5.2.9)
NOT TO EXCEED
Vehicle Testing (SOW Section 5.3.3)
Post Round 1 Vehicle Analysis (SOW Section 5.2.10)
Vehicle Emission Analysis (SOW Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.3, 5.4.4,
5.4.5(Only continuous and integrated PM mass samples), 5.4.7
Speciation Analysis (SOW Section 5.4.5 Only gaseous cmpds, 5.4.5.5)
Data Analysis (SOW Section 5.4.6)
Maintenance of Emission Equipment (SOW Section 5.4.8)
Contract Incentive Plan
PHASE 2: ROUND 1 SPECIATION TOXIC ANALYSIS
Speciation Toxic Analysis - all other analyses (SOW Section 5.4.5.2,
5.4.5.3,5.4.5.4,5.4.5.6)
PHASE 3: ROUND 2 VEHICLE TESTING
Vehicle Recruitment (SOW Section 5.2.7b)
Participation Incentives (SOW Section 5.2.9)
NOT TO EXCEED
Vehicle Testing (SOW Section 5.3.3)
Vehicle Emission Analysis (SOW Sections 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.3, 5.4.4,
5.4.5((Only continuous and integrated PMmass samples)), 5.4.7)
Speciation Analysis (SOW Section 5.4.5 Only gaseous cmpds, 5.4.5.5)
Data Analysis (SOW Section 5.4.6)
Maintenance of Emission Equipment (SOW Section 5.4.8)
Contract Incentive Plan
TOTAL PRICE
$64,144.4(
$1 92,293. 0(
$286,786. 5(
$43,861.6:
$45,552.8'
$105,043.43
$301,982.95
$21,975.4'
$583,111.60
$255,006.12
$64,862.43
$30,886. 1(
$43,861.6:
$50,923.5^
$44,077.3*
$105,043.4:
$289,914.3:
$753,625.55
$255,006.K
$37,406.7(
$28,074.85
$87,723. 2(
Attachment 7 - Page: 1
-------
Task Order Line Items
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
OPTION
4
0005
OPTION
5
0006
PHASES: ROUND 2 SPECIATION TOXIC ANALYSIS
Speciation Toxic Analysis - all other analyses (SOW Section 5.4.5.2,
5.4.5.3,5.4.5.4,5.4.5.6)
FINAL REPORT / ANALYSIS
Final Report / Analysis
$55,161.01
$148,139.4'
Maximum Total Price $3,894,463.!
Attachment 7 - Page: 2
-------
Incentive Plan
Contract: GS-10F-0036K, Task Order: 1104
Lead PR Number: PR-CI-04-10377
TASK ORDER INCENTIVE PLAN
In accomplishment of this task order the U.S. EPA expects the contractor to provide accurate,
effective, and timely performance. As such, an incentive shall be established regarding contractor
performance. The contractor has the opportunity to be awarded up to 5% of the total task order value
as described below:
Deliverable
Incentive
Surveillance Method
PHASE 1 (Line Items
0001A, 0001B, and
0001C) completed in
accordance with the
attached Performance
Work Statement.
For accurate, effective,
and timely completion
of Phase 1 in
accordance with the
attached Performance
Work Statement, the
Contractor may be
awarded up to 1.25%
of the total value of the
established task order
price, exclusive of
participation incentives.
The contractor will be
evaluated based on the
accuracy,
effectiveness, and
timeliness of data
received as a result of
contractor
performance on this
task order, as set forth
in the Performance
Work Statement.
PHASE 2 (Line Items
0002A, 0002C,
0002D, 0002E,
0002F, 0002G,
0002H, and 0003)
completed in
accordance with the
attached Performance
Work Statement.
For accurate, effective,
and timely completion
of Phase 2 in
accordance with the
attached Performance
Work Statement, the
Contractor may be
awarded up to 1.25%
of the total value of the
established task order
price, exclusive of
participation incentives.
The contractor will be
evaluated based on the
accuracy,
effectiveness, and
timeliness of data
received as a result of
contractor
performance on this
task order, as set forth
in the Performance
Work Statement.
PHASE 3 (Line Items
0004A, 0004C,
0004D, 0004E,
0004F, 0004G, and
0005) completed in
accordance with the
attached Performance
Work Statement.
For accurate, effective,
and timely completion
of Phase 3 in
accordance with the
attached Performance
Work Statement, the
Contractor may be
awarded up to 2.5% of
the total value of the
established task order
price, exclusive of
participation incentives.
The contractor will be
evaluated based on the
accuracy,
effectiveness, and
timeliness of data
received as a result of
contractor
performance on this
task order, as set forth
in the Performance
Work Statement.
Attachment
- Page: 1
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix DD
Work Plan
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Characterizing Exhaust
Emissions from Light-Duty
Gasoline Vehicles in the Kansas
City Metropolitan Area
Work Plan
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
April 14, 2004
-------
ERG No.: 0133.18.000.001
CHARACTERIZING EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM LIGHT-DUTY
GASOLINE VEHICLES IN THE KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN AREA
WORK PLAN
EPA Contract No. GS-10F-0036K
Prepared for:
Kitty Walsh
Project Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2000 Traverwood Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Prepared by:
Eastern Research Group
5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78731-4947
April 14, 2004
-------
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
2.0 Technical Approach 4
2.1 Project Overview 4
2.1.1 Summary of Daily Activities 11
2.1.2 Summary of Exhaust Measurements 12
2.1.3 Differences Between Proposal and Scope of Work 15
2.2 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Quality Management Plan (QMP)
Task (Section 5.1) 18
2.3 Vehicle Recruitment Tasks (Section 5.2) 18
2.3.1 Vehicle Recruitment Pilot Study (Section 5.2.1) 19
2.3.2 Cohort/Vehicle Analysis (Section 5.2.2) 22
2.3.2.1 Cohort Frame Analysis (Section 5.2.2.a) 22
2.3.2.2 Cohort Recruitment (Respondent/Non-respondent) Analysis
(Section 5.2.2.b) 23
2.3.3 Cohort/Vehicle Fleet Analysis (Section 5.2.3) 23
2.3.4 Cohort/Vehicle Emission Analysis (Section 5.2.4) 24
2.3.5 Cohort/Vehicle Summary Analysis (Section 5.2.5) 24
2.3.6 Vehicle Recruitment Sample Plan (Section 5.2.6) 24
2.3.7 Vehicle Recruitment (Section 5.2.7) 24
2.3.7.1 Vehicle Recruitment (Round 1) (Section 5.2.7a) 27
2.3.7.2 Vehicle Recruitment (Round 2) (Section 5.2.7b) 30
2.3.8 Non-Response Assessment (Section 5.2.8) 32
2.3.9 Participation Incentives (Section 5.2.9) 33
2.3.10 Post Round 1 Vehicle Analysis (Section 5.2.10) 33
2.4 Vehicle Testing Task (Section 5.3) 34
2.4.1 Pilot Vehicle Testing Task (Section 5.3.1) 34
2.4.2 Vehicle Testing Task (Specialized Sampling and Analytical Needs)
(Section 5.3.2) 38
2.4.3 Vehicle Testing Task (Section 5.3.3) 43
2.4.3.1 Protective Covering for Equipment and Test Vehicles (Section
5.3.3.1) 44
2.4.3.2 Vehicle Testing and Data Collection (Section 5.3.3.2) 44
2.4.3.3 RSD Evaluation (Section 5.3.3.3) 48
2.4.3.4 Vehicle Fluid Sampling (Section 5.3.3.4) 49
2.4.3.5 PEMS/PAMS Data (Section 5.3.3.5) 50
2.4.3.6 Vehicle Testing Reports (Section 5.3.3.6) 52
2.5 Speciation Tasks (Section 5.4) 52
2.5.1 Pilot Methods Testing Task (Section 5.4.1) 53
2.5.2 Source Testing Equipment Preparation Task (Section 5.4.2) 54
2.5.3 Operating Continuous Measurements of Fine PM Task (Section 5.4.3) 54
2.5.3.1 Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) (Section 5.4.3.1) 55
2.5.3.2 Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (Section 5.4.3.2)55
2.5.3.3 Nephelometer (Section 5.4.3.3) 55
-------
2.5.3.4 Photoacoustic Instrument (Section 5.4.3.4) 56
2.5.4 Integrated Sample Collection and Sample Analyses Task (Section 5.4.4)57
2.5.5 Integrated Sample Analyses Task (Section 5.4.5) 59
2.5.5.1 PM2.s Mass Gravimetric Analysis (Section 5.4.5.1) 59
2.5.5.2 Elements (Section 5.4.5.2) 60
2.5.5.3 EC/OC (Section 5.4.5.3) 60
2.5.5.4 Ion Chromatographic Analysis for Chloride, Nitrate, and Sulfate
(Section 5.4.5.4) 62
2.5.5.5 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (Section 5.4.5.5) 63
2.5.5.6 Gaseous Air Toxics (Section 5.4.5.6) 65
2.5.6 Data Analysis Task 69
2.5.6.1 Data Validation 69
2.5.6.2 Variability of Emission Rates of Volatile Air Toxics 70
2.5.6.3 Development and Evaluation of Composition Profiles 70
2.5.7 Analysis of Continuous PM and EC Data Task 71
2.5.8 Maintenance of Emission Equipment Task (Section 5.4.8) 72
2.5.9 Health, Safety, and Environmental Practices Task (Section 5.4.9) 73
3.0 Organization 87
3.1 ERG Team Members 87
3.2 Communication with EPA Project Officer and Sponsors 91
4.0 Project Schedule 93
11
-------
Table List
Table 2-1 Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum 27
Table 2-2 Estimated Number of Vehicles Recruited and Test Performed 28
Table 2-3 Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum for Round 2 Re-Testing 30
Table 2-4 Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum for Non-Respondent Testing 32
Table 2-5 Incentives 33
Table 2-6 Expected PM Mass Loadings for Light-Duty Vehicles (micrograms per sample)43
Table 2-7 Oil Sample Analyses 50
Table 2-8 Summary of measurements and sample collection for the Kansas City LDGV
Characterization Study 74
Table 2-9 Base sampling configuration for the Kansas City LDGV Characterization Study75
Table 2-10 Numbers of samples collected during the Kansas City LDGV Characterization
Study 76
Table 2-11 Numbers of samples analyzed during the Kansas City LDGV Characterization
Study 77
Table 2-12 Analysis list of inorganic species for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study 78
Table 2-13 Relative detection limits for XRF and ICP-MS elemental analysis 79
Table 2-14 Analysis list of hydrocarbons and carbonyl compounds for the Kansas City LDGV
Emission Characterization Study 80
Table 2-15 Analysis list of poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for the Kansas City LDGV
Emission Characterization Study 81
Table 2-16 Analysis list of hopanes, steranes and alkanes for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study 82
Table 2-17 Analysis list of polar organics for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study 83
Table 2-18 Potential instrument configuration for continuous and quasi-continuous
measurement of PM 84
Table 2-19 Potential instruments for integral measurement of PM 85
Table 3-1 Key ERG Team Members 87
Table 4-1 Proposed Project Schedule 93
Table 4-2 List of Deliverables 94
Figure List
Figure 1-1 Example Plot of PM Data from Light-Duty Gasoline Cars and Trucks, Model Year
1994 and Older 2
Figure 2-1 Vehicle Pilot Testing 5
Figure 2-2 Vehicle Recruitment Task (Part l)Figure 2-3. Vehicle Recruitment Task (Part
2)Figure 2-4. Vehicle Testing Task (Rounds 1 and 2)Figure 2-5. Summary of
Daily Activities 5
Figure 2-2 Vehicle Recruitment Task (Part l)Figure 2-3. Vehicle Recruitment Task (Part
2)Figure 2-4. Vehicle Testing Task (Rounds 1 and 2)Figure 2-5. Summary of
Daily Activities 6
in
-------
Figure 2-3 Vehicle Recruitment Task (Part 2)Figure 2-4. Vehicle Testing Task (Rounds 1 and
2)Figure 2-5. Summary of Daily Activities 7
Figure 2-4 Vehicle Testing Task (Rounds 1 and 2)Figure 2-5. Summary of Daily Activities. 8
Figure 2-5 Summary of Daily Activities 9
Figure 2-6 Kansas City Exhaust Measurement Flowchart 14
Figure 2-7 Distribution of light-duty gasoline vehicle PM2.5 mass emission rates by model
year and mileage categories. Preliminary results from the DOE Gasoline/Diesel
PM Split Study (Source: Gabele, 2003) 41
Figure 2-8 Distribution of PM2.5 emission rates by ascending mileage accumulation and
vehicle age. Preliminary results from the DOE Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study
(Source: Gabele, 2003) 42
Figure 2-9 Correlation of 1,3-butadiene with ethene and propene for 57 LDGVs tested during
the Gas/Diesel PM Split Study (Preliminary, unpublished data) 86
IV
-------
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CERTIFICATION
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
EPA Contract No. 68-C-OO-l 12
Work Assignment/Task Order No.: 3-07
In accordance with EPAAR 1552.209-71 (Organizational Conflicts of Interest), EPAAR 1552.209-73
(Notification of Conflicts of Interest Regarding Personnel), and Prime Contract clause (Work
Assignment Conflicts of Interest Certification), Eastern Research Group, Inc. makes the following
certifications:
ORGANIZATIONAL AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
[x] To the best of our knowledge and belief, no actual or potential
organizational conflicts of interest exist. In addition, none of the
individuals proposed for work under this Work Assignment/Task Order
has any personal conflicts of interest.
OR:
D To the best of our knowledge and belief, all actual or potential
organizational and personal conflicts of interest have been reported to the
EPA Contracting Officer. If applicable, attached is a letter disclosing the
conflict of interest.
This is to certify that our personnel, who perform work under this Work Assignment/Task Order, or
relating to this Work Assignment/Task Order, have been informed of their obligation to report personal
and organizational conflicts of interest to our designated COI official.
Eastern Research Group, Inc. recognizes its continuing obligation to search for, identify, and report any
actual or potential organizational or personnel conflicts of interests that may arise during the performance
of this Work Assignment/Task Order or work relating to this Work Assignment/Task Order.
Authorized Signature
Sandeep Kishan. P.E.
Printed Name
Vice President. Mobile Sources
Title
May 14. 2004
Date
-------
1.0 Introduction
The KCMSA PM characterization study requires a contractor team with technical
expertise in a number of diverse specialty areas, including QA/QC, vehicle sample selection and
stratification, motorist recruitment, emissions/fuel testing and lab analysis, data evaluation, and
fleet characterization. In addition, the team must have the managerial expertise to coordinate all
of these efforts and integrate the findings for the final product.
The ERG Team has proven capabilities in all of these areas. In addition, many of our
team members are also leading experts in the fields of combustion PM formation and PM
emissions modeling. Some of our key team members have been actively involved in the peer
review and framework development for the MOVES model. We have also been intimately
involved with the collection and use of second-by-second emissions and vehicle parameter data
for many years. As such, our team members also understand the broader context of the study,
regarding the ultimate uses and potential limitations of the study results.
1.1 Background
Recent studies have indicated that gasoline vehicles contribute significantly to ambient
PM. PM emissions from gasoline sources have been shown to be predominantly in the PM2.5
size range especially for so called "smoker" vehicles.
Review of research led by Steve Cadle (1998), Joe Norbeck (1998), and Kevin Whitney
(1998) indicates that gasoline powered vehicles with visible smoke in their exhaust plume emit
about 9-times more particulate than non-smoking vehicles. This factor probably varies with
model-year, with new smoking vehicles emitting more, and older smoking vehicles emitting less
than this amount.
The research by Cadle and Norbeck estimated the incidence of vehicles with visible
smoke plumes using roadside surveys. Cadle used both remote sensing and visual surveys in
Denver, Colorado and Norbeck used the visual method in Southern California. Their results
were somewhat different, but the fleet average incidence was found to be about 1%. Also, ERG
has estimated the incidence of smoking vehicles in the Phoenix fleet by analyzing data from the
Maricopa County Smoking Vehicle Hotline. Data from the Maricopa County Smoking Vehicle
Hotline indicates that the incidence of smoking vehicles that are new is up to 100-times lower
than the fleet average, and the incidence of older smoking vehicles is up to 4-times higher than
the average, indicating a strong age dependence for smokers.
-------
Many studies have tried to characterize the distribution of PM for a vehicle fleet. One
such example is shown in Figure 1-1. We see that this is an age dependence in the data but also
that there is a large variance among vehicles. As an example, 10-year-old vehicles can have PM
emissions from 1-2 mg/mi to 1,000 mg/mi.
However, study designs have been lacking in their focus to develop random sampling
techniques with careful attention to non-responsive behavior. For this research, the Project
Sponsors have developed the following goals:
• Characterize gaseous and PM toxics exhaust emissions.
• Characterize the particle size distribution from these vehicles.
• Characterize the fraction of high emitters in the fleet.
Figure 1-1. Example Plot of PM Data from Light-Duty Gasoline Cars and Trucks,
Model Year 1994 and Older
Particulate
(mg/mi)
Scale •
Axis |
i
nm -
* * * •
1 1
New Vehicle Standard = 200 mg/mi » * * 1 •
... J...J.
* t 1 *
• i i
; ' : ! * I i
; ! ! M $ • 1 1 M
: ' . M ! 5 • : ! : •
* 1 • i » I $
* • «
*
1
•
•
1
•
1 U* i '
..i...^...^...«...J-...f -» —
i : i i : • * * t
• » * * •
« t « i : ! •
MM ' I- • '
:hi's!:!
• » ^
•
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Age (years)
Source: Burnette, A.D.; Kishan, S., "PART5-TX1: Update of the PARTS Model For Use In
Texas." Final report by ERG for the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (now
named Texas Commission on Environmental Quality). Austin, Texas, July 14, 2000.
Note: The data are from in-use vehicles recruited from private owners. The database was
compiled from various research sources.
Data obtained from this program will be used to evaluate and update existing and future
mobile source emission models. This project will also provide a benchmark to establish various
-------
vehicle recruitment, testing, data collection, and vehicle exhaust emissions analysis protocols
which EPA may use in future data collection efforts.
-------
2.0 Technical Approach
Section 2.1 presents an overview of the entire project. Starting in Section 2.2 we present
a detailed description of all technical tasks required. Parenthetical references to Section 5 of
EPA's SOW are included in the section titles.
2.1 Project Overview
The ERG team will conduct a well-organized and efficient research program to identify,
recruit, test, and analyze the exhaust PM emissions from 480 vehicles in the Kansas City area.
We have broken the project down into the following major components:
• Vehicle pilot testing;
• Recruitment;
• Testing and Analysis; and
• Reporting
The management and reporting tasks will be ongoing activities throughout the project.
Our team will communicate with the Project Officer and the Project Sponsors through:
• Written reports;
• Face-to-face meetings;
• Regular conference calls; and
• Project website.
A kick-off meeting was held in Ann Arbor to initiate the project, and the ERG team is in
the process of developing of the quality documents. We has also developed a schedule of bi-
weekly conference calls with the project team, and has implemented a password-protected
project website, through which the project team can gauge the progress of the project. We will
also develop monthly progress reports and all the reports listed in Section 6.0 of the RFP. The
final deliverable of the project will be a complete MSOD compatible database with an
accompanying final report.
A detailed flowchart covering the first three components is shown in Figures 2-1 through
2-5.
-------
Figure 2-1. Vehicle Pilot Testing
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
-------
Figure 2-2. Vehicle Recruitment Task (Part 1)
T
T
T
T
T
-------
Figure 2-3. Vehicle Recruitment Task (Part 2)
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
-------
Figure 2-4. Vehicle Testing Task (Rounds 1 and 2)
T
T
-------
Figure 2-5. Summary of Daily Activities
-------
Draft QAPP and QMP documents will be developed and presented to the Project Officer
for approval before beginning the work on site in Kansas City. ERG has an office in Kansas
City, which will be used for on-site coordination. We have also identified several options for a
suitable warehouse, which could be used for vehicle testing. We have received a market survey
from a broker and the location of the testing site will be finalized after a site visit by our vehicle
testing contractor, BKI. The pilot phase will then be started by transporting and setting up the
equipment in Kansas City. The three vehicles supplied by EPA will be used. The dynamometer
and measurement equipment will be made operational and several practice tests will be
conducted prior to testing the pilot vehicles. Real time PM evaluation, integrated sample
collection system, and the gaseous toxics evaluation will all be made operational. Any
derivations and changes from the QAPP will be noted. A pilot vehicle test report will be
prepared at the conclusion of the pilot testing.
The ERG Team will conduct the vehicle recruitment task assuring statistically
representative sample selection, and effective use of incentives. We believe that a Random Digit
Dial (ROD) approach to cohort development offers the most robust approach to sample
development, and is preferred over the strategy used to stratify the existing cohort. Therefore a
new cohort of at least 2,000 households/4,000 vehicles will be developed using this
methodology. Once established, the cohort will be evaluated for non-response bias and
compared to the entire registered KC MSA fleet in terms of model year and other discrete
variables, as well as RSD emissions data to the extent possible. A geodemographic comparison
will also be performed. Based on these comparisons a determination will be made regarding
which data set to use for vehicle recruitment.
Preferred vehicle incentive packages to be used for recruitment will be developed under
the Vehicle Recruitment Pilot subtask. In this subtask different incentive packages will be
evaluated for effectiveness, for both respondents and non-respondents. The preferred incentive
package will consider both acceptance rates, as well as recruitment and incentive costs. The
selected package will be used in the Round 1 Vehicle Recruitment task, and may be modified if
needed for Round 2.
Our subcontractor, BKI, will lead the vehicle testing task. Upon a vehicle's arrival at the
testing site an initial inspection and paperwork session will be performed before soaking the
vehicle overnight. The vehicle will be scheduled for testing on the dynamometer the next day.
DRI will assist the on-site ERG team in collecting the continuous PM measurements and the
integrated sample collection for the filter samples. The gaseous samples will also be collected
10
-------
and analyzed by DRI. Fuel and oil samples will also be collected and stored for all vehicles,
with a subset of these oil samples provided to a lab for analysis (fuel samples will be collected,
but not analyzed). The PEMS/PAMS deployment will be conducted on selected vehicles after
the vehicle testing. RSD measurements will also be conducted on all vehicles tested as well as a
portion of the Kansas City fleet. DRI will perform the analysis of the speciation data. The
dynamometer emissions data and the continuous PM measurements will be collected in a
common database on-site. PEMS/PAMS, PM gravimetric, elements, EC/OC, ions, and gaseous
analysis will be added to the dataset later.
2.1.1 Summary of Daily Activities
The Summary of Daily Activities section of the flow chart illustrates how a test vehicle
will be processed and tested over a two day period. Vehicles will be over-recruited to ensure that
5 suitable vehicles will be available each day. On day one, vehicles previously scheduled will be
received and inspected at the test facility. An initial inspection will determine if the vehicle is
suitable for testing (no major repairs required, not too large for the dynamometer, etc.). Repairs
that would result in exclusion of a vehicle from the test program include (but are not limited to):
• Replacement of vehicle exhaust system. New exhaust systems would have to be
conditioned for quite some time (200- 300 miles) to remove cutting oils. These
oils could bias the PM results.
• Replacement of catalyst. Conditioning would be required to age the catalyst
(approximately 5000 miles).
• Engine or engine component replacement or rebuild within the last 5000 miles,
including heads, valves, block, etc.
Replacement and/or repair of other systems (A/C, steering, brakes, body, tires,
transmission, etc.) will generally be considered acceptable. Replacement and/or repair of
emission control components (oxygen sensor, EGR valve, etc.) can be considered maintenance
actions and are acceptable, but a short break-in period of approximately 100 miles would be
necessary before testing.
Upon successful initial inspection of the vehicle, it will be accepted for emissions testing
and the vehicle owner will be given a leaner car. The vehicle will next be video taped (to
document overall condition), OBD data will be taken, and pertinent vehicle data will be
recorded. In the event that minor repairs are needed (exhaust leaks, faulty tires, etc.), the vehicle
will be driven to a local repair facility for repairs to ensure valid test results and safety. If the
exhaust system requires major repair/replacement the vehicle will not be tested because of the
11
-------
lengthy preconditioning required for exhaust systems. If only the tailpipe section has a problem,
it will be removed, and the exhaust transfer tube will be connected directly to the exhaust system
underneath the vehicle. Processing will continue with installation of PEMS and driving of the
vehicle over a prescribed conditioning route. If the vehicle performance is satisfactory, a
qualitative determination of PM emissions will be made via PM sniffer, as well as visually, in
order to rank the vehicle as a low, medium, or high emitter. Low and medium PM emitters will
be cued for testing first on the following day. At the conclusion of Day 1, the conditioned
vehicles will be soaked overnight at ambient temperatures.
On day two, emissions tests will be performed on the vehicle. The day will start with the
dilution tunnel warmup being performed, followed by dynamometer warmup and calibrations.
The first test vehicle will then be placed and secured onto the dynamometer for the cold start
LA92 driving cycle. All samplers and real time instruments will be readied for testing. A PEMS
unit dedicated for use with the dynamometer testing will also be interfaced to the test vehicle.
Real time and integrated samples to be collected over the 3 phase test cycle include regulated
emissions, PEMS data, real time PM mass and elemental carbon, and integrated PM mass,
EC/OC, Ions, SVOC, and gaseous air toxics. At the conclusion of the test cycle, the vehicle
exhaust will be disconnected from the dilution tunnel and the dilution tunnel will be purged for at
least 30 minutes. During this time, the test vehicle will again undergo a qualitative smoke
evaluation, with the exhaust being video taped (if required) against a light background.
Following this, the vehicle will be removed from the dynamometer and a PEMS/PAMS unit will
be installed on selected vehicles. Tunnel blanks will be collected in the middle of the day during
lunch instead of at the beginning of each test day. At the end of each test day the CVS tunnel
will be reconditioned by setting the dilution tunnel heater to its highest level and the dilution
tunnel will be thoroughly purged.
2.1.2 Summary of Exhaust Measurements
Details of the types of samples and analyses to be performed are shown in Figure 2-6.
The PEMS/PAMS system will sample a small portion of the raw exhaust for bag regulated
emissions (THC, CO, CO2, NOx). The remaining raw exhaust will be directed to the CVS,
where it will be diluted with temperature and humidity conditioned air. The remaining samples
will then be taken from this diluted mixture. Real time and bag regulated emissions will be
determined using instrumentation housed in EPA's transportable dynamometer analytical trailer.
Aldehydes and Carbonyls will be collected on DNPH cartridges and subsequently transported to
the laboratory for HPLC analysis. VOCs will be collected in canisters and also transported to the
laboratory for GC speciation. Real time instrumentation for PM analyses include photoacoustic
12
-------
(BC), Nephelometer (PM2.5 ) and QCM (PM2.5) instruments. These instruments will be
interfaced to the CVS dilution tunnel via appropriately sized iso-kinetic probes and temperature
controlled lines. Additional PM samples will be collected on filter media and transported to the
laboratory for analysis. These samples will be collected from an iso-kinetic probe equipped with
a 2.5 um cutpoint cyclone. Teflon membrane filters will be used to collect samples for
gravimetric mass and elemental analysis. Pre-fired quartz filters will be used to collect samples
for EC/OC and ion analysis. TIGF/XAD will be used to collect samples for PM and SVOC
analysis.
13
-------
Figure 2-6. Kansas City Exhaust Measurement Flowchart
PEMS/PAMS
(contains
proportional sampler
may include QCM)
r ~fE~FL6N~ME~MBRANE~-~
gravimetric mass and
L. _ele_nleI1Lai Sn_aJy§i§ iAIa}
QUARTZ FILTER - EC/OC
and ions (A1 b)
TIGF/XAD - PM and SVOC
(A2a)
CANISTERS W/NOx
DENUDER-VOC
srjecjation_(A3a)_ _.
DNPH CARTRIDGES -
carbonyls (A3b)
Side A
Diluted Exhaust
Constant Volume Sampler
(CVS)
Trailer
PHOTOACOUSTIC - BC
(B1)
NEPHELOMETER- PM2.5
(B3)
QCM - PM2.5 (B4)
Side B
FID-THC
NDIR - CO
NDIR-CO2
Chemiluminescence - NOx
14
-------
2.1.3 Differences Between Proposal and Scope of Work
Several changes to the sampling and analysis protocol were incorporated into this version
of the study plan resulting from discussions among the project sponsors and contractors. The
changes are summarized below.
Vehicle Sample Selection
• At the kick-off meeting it was clear that this study does not require an
overrepresentation of smoking vehicles. They will come into the study according
to their prevalence in the area. As such, special protocols will not be required for
smoking vehicles. Our recruitment protocols will elicit information about
whether or not the subject believes that he/she has a "smoking" vehicle, but we
will not be invoking sampling procedures to guarantee s prespecificed nominal
representation of this vehicle attribute.
• At the kick-off meeting, NuStats provided background on the Kansas City
Regional Household Travel Survey. The Travel Survey sample was drawn using
list-assisted random digit dialing sampling methodology and in conducting the
survey, collected demographic and vehicle information for each participating
household. Because of tentative interest by the Mid-American Regional Council
(MARC) in this study, NuStats sought and received approval to use the Travel
Survey database to draw the sample for the recruitment pilot study. The Study is a
rich source of vehicle movement by vehicle type, and NuStats felt it would
enhance the analysis and estimate of emissions data in the region. Under this
scenario, households that participated in the Kansas City Regional Household
Travel Survey would be reviewed and categorized (demographic and fleet
characteristics). Using this existing data will enable the Team to conduct the pilot
study sooner and focus resources on designing the incentive study questionnaire
using, a stated preference (SP) survey technique. Note that the Travel Survey data
will supplement the sample purchased from Marketing Systems Group.
Vehicle Recruitment
• A stated preference (SP) survey technique will be used in the incentive study.
The SP approach relies on an experimental design of various incentive
combinations in order to identify the most important attributes of the incentives as
well as the best combination to ensure participation for various demographic
groups.
• An advance letter will be sent to households prior to recruitment. This letter will
focus on study objectives and purpose, provide a contact to verify legitimacy, and
be written such that the importance of participating is paramount. Doing so will
lend legitimacy to the project and serve to increase participation rates.
15
-------
Vehicle Sample Analysis
• The Scope of Work and proposal call for comparative analyses and the use of
statistical tests (e.g., Chi-square tests, difference of means, etc.) to determine the
extent to which differences occur and to measure significance of those
differences. Given the straightforwardness of the analysis, these types of tests are
unnecessary for phase I sampling, although analysis to answer research questions
is still needed.
Protective Covering for Equipment
Locations have been identified in the Kansas City Metropolitan area for protection of the
analytical testing equipment and the recruited vehicles. To better protect the analytical
equipment and the consumer's vehicles from the elements during a study of this magnitude, an
industrial warehouse has been secured. This warehouse exceeds the requirements set forth in the
Scope of Work for protective coverings for the testing equipment.
Testing Protocol and Continuous PMMeasurements
• PEMS units will be used more extensively in the emissions testing process than
was previously proposed. PEMS units will now be installed during the vehicle
conditioning run, prior to vehicle placement upon the dynamometer, to gather
additional data. A PEMS unit will also be attached during dynamometer testing as
well. Also note that originally, PEMS units were intended to take measurements
of HC, CO, NOx, and CO2 using the Semtech-G instrument. PEMS units will
now include an additional QCM for PM measurement.
• The dynamometer dilution air will be dehumidified and heated to 47°C +/- 5°C
during testing. No residence chamber will be used for integrated samples and
sampling streams will be maintained at 47°C +/- 5°C. The photoacoustic
instrument is an exception since it is designed to operate at below 35 °C and black
carbon concentrations should not be affected by temperature.
• Tunnel blanks will be collected in the middle of the day during lunch instead of at
the beginning of each test day. The duration of the tunnel blank sample should be
equivalent to the length of the UDC cycle minus the 10-minute soak or some
multiple of this duration.
• The dilution tunnel will be purged between tests for at least 30 minutes.
Continuous PM measurements will be monitored to ensure that background levels
have stabilized after the prescribed purge period. The adequacy of purge time will
be evaluated during the pilot study.
• The EPA-supplied TEOM is eliminated. DRI will operate its own TEOM and
DustTrak at no cost to the project. However, these measurements will be made as
time and resources permit and have lower priority than the QCM, nephelometer
and photoacoustic measurements.
16
-------
BKI will provide DRI with a time-speed data signal that can be incorporated with
the continuous PM database.
Integrated Samples and Compositing
• Vehicles will be brought in for testing randomly. No media composites will be
used.
• The back-up quartz filter from the dual quartz filter pack is eliminated. The RFP
proposed collecting a second, backup quartz filter behind the primary quartz filter
and using the backup as a blank. This backup filter is not an appropriate blank.
This approach might be applicable for ambient sampling where relative amounts
of SVOC on the aerosol are considerably less than under source sampling
conditions. We recommended appropriate numbers of dilution tunnel and field
blanks for establishing blank levels and their variability. In addition to collecting
quartz blanks during the tunnel blank samples, we are also recommending placing
a second quartz filter behind the Teflon (rather than the quartz filter) to
characterize the relative importance of SVOC on gravimetric mass. This issue will
be evaluated during the pilot study where sampling will be conducted at two
temperatures.
• The second quartz filter for ion analysis is eliminated. Each half of the three
quartz filters for OC/EC analysis will be extracted together and analyzed for ions.
Chemical Analysis
• After gravimetric analysis of the three Teflon filters for the separate phases of the
UDC, the three Teflon filters will be extracted together and the composite sample
analyzed for elements by ICP-MS. Table 2-12 compares the elements that are
quantified by XRF and ICP-MS and the associated minimum detection limits.
Neither method will provide data for all specified elements. We recommend a
combination of XRF using DRI protocol A ($2 I/sample or $63/test for three
Teflon filters from each phase of the UDC) and ICP-MS for selected elements
(e.g., Pb and Hg definitely and possibly As, Zn, Ni, Mn and Cr) at a cost of ($36
per sample for the first element and $2 for each additional element assuming
combining the extracts from the three Teflon filters). Total cost per test would be
comparable to the budget estimate in our original proposal of $128 per test.
• Because no media compositing will be possible, TIGF filters and XAD cartridges
be extracted and analyzed separately for the 1991 to 1995 and 1996 and newer
categories. The TIGF filter has a very low background and removing the artifacts
from the XAD will improve the detection limits for particulate organic species.
Several samples will be composited together based on appropriate sample
composite criteria (e.g., emission rate and ratio of photoacoustic black carbon to
QCM mass).
17
-------
• All of the PM/SVOC organic analysis will be shifted from field blanks and some
from transportation blanks to dilution tunnel blanks. Analytical blanks will
remain unchanged.
• DRI will upgrade the existing gravimetric analysis to a 0.0001 mg balance.
Sampling and Analysis During Pilot Study
• Integrated measurements of gravimetric mass, OC and EC, and volatile and
particulate organic compounds speciation will be included during the pilot study.
RSD Testing
• The Scope of Work originally contained methodology to test certain recruited
vehicles (in the recruited sample) using RSD. It is ERG's opinion that the most
important use of RSD in this project will be to compare the cohort to the Kansas
City fleet as a whole. Any available RSD information is a few years old, and our
intention is to obtain current RSD information. Thus, in addition to testing
selected vehicles in the cohort, RSD systems will be deployed at several sites
around Kansas City to allow for collection of this data.
The following describes ERG's technical approach to EPA's scope of work, as per
Sections oftheRFP.
2.2 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Quality Management Plan
(QMP) Task (Section 5.1)
As specified in the RFP, the ERG team will provide draft QMP and QAPP documents
according to the following schedule.
• A draft QMP and QAPP for each measurement system to the client within 30 days
of task order execution.
• A final QAPP within 30 days of the end of the Pilot Study
2.3 Vehicle Recruitment Tasks (Section 5.2)
The vehicle recruitment effort is comprised of 5 tasks that begin with a study to identify
the appropriate incentives and conclude with initial recruitment of households to participate in
Round 1 activities. The activities involved in performing these tasks are discussed below, along
with a summary of the proposed schedule, key dates, and deliverables.
18
-------
2.3.1 Vehicle Recruitment Pilot Study (Section 5.2.1)
The purpose of this task is to identify the incentives that will be necessary to ensure
participation by regional households. The result will be the creation of an effective motorist
recruitment incentive package for vehicle testing and instrumentation, as well as providing the
best assurance for a high response rate. The task activities cover sampling, survey design and
administration, and analysis of results.
Subtask A. Pretest Household Sample Design
The demographic and fleet characteristics of the households that participated in the
Kansas City Regional Household Travel Survey will be reviewed and categorized in order to
draw a random sample of households for contact in the incentives test. This will be
supplemented by a random general population sample, as both are anticipated for inclusion in the
full study. The goal for the incentives test is to include a geodemographic representation of
Kansas City residents, not necessarily a sample that is representative of the regional vehicle fleet.
(The fleet characteristics will be considered for the full study testing. Here, the pilot is
concerned with identifying incentives necessary to offer to the vehicle owners for participating in
the study.)
Subtask B. Develop Incentive Options
As identified in the proposal, specific incentives (or combinations thereof) that will be
investigated include cash (different levels), rental cars (different qualities), gas tank refills, car
washes, and guaranteed rides. A matrix of options with varying levels as well as combinations
of options will be developed to ensure a thorough testing during the survey.
The issue of whether respondents with smoking vehicles would require different
incentives and whether using a different incentive structure would result in a over-representation
of these types of vehicles in the data set was raised in the proposal.
Subtask C. Develop Draft Survey Instrument
Once the incentive option matrix has been finalized, a survey will be designed to test
respondent reaction to the incentive options for both vehicle testing as well as vehicle
instrumentation. The survey will begin with a brief explanation of the project and what is being
requested of the respondent in terms of vehicle testing and instrumentation. Then the respondent
will be presented with varying levels and combinations of incentives to identify the optimal mix
for ensuring high participation rates and minimizing non-response. This survey will be
19
-------
conducted in English and Spanish, based on the language preference of the respondent. We
anticipate about 5% of the interviewers to be in Spanish, based on language prevalence in a
current transportation study of the Kansas City region.
The questionnaire will be designed for administration using computer-aided telephone
interviewing (CATI) technology. The power of the CATI software will allow for a thorough and
random testing of the incentive options. The survey will be designed for an interview that might
last up to 20 minutes.
Two approaches will be used in the survey instrument. The first uses a method similar to
the contingent evaluation technique, in order to identify the minimum levels for each incentive
necessary to induce participation. For those combinations of incentives, a stated preference (SP)
survey technique will be utilized. The SP approach relies on an experimental design of various
incentive combinations in order to identify the most important attributes of the incentives as well
as the best combination to ensure participation for various demographic groups.
Subtask D. Develop Data Collection Protocols
Although the survey will be administered using CATI technology (which implicitly
contains the criteria for when particular questions will be asked and how the incentive levels and
combinations will be offered), the sample management protocol, interviewer training, and survey
administration details will be summarized prior to the start of the pilot. This also includes the
timing of the advance mailing as well as identification of the debrief questions regarding the
explanation of the vehicle testing concept and the advance mailing.
Subtask E. Develop Survey Materials
Survey research literature contains several citations regarding the positive correlation
between the use of advance notification materials and the study response rate. For this study, an
advance letter will be designed to inform the randomly selected households of the forthcoming
interview and provide contact information to legitimize the study. The letter should be signed by
an EPA staff person, preferably someone at the Kansas City office. It should also provide
contact information for the EPA project manager and the NuStats manager, in case of questions.
Subtask F. CATI Program and Logic Test
May 4th is the target date for final approva
allows time for the CATI programming and logic check software to be developed and fully
May 4th is the target date for final approval of the pilot survey and materials. This date
20
-------
tested. Because the survey will incorporate experimental design elements to support the SP
survey, a full week is necessary for testing to ensure the skips and rotations work as specified.
Subtask G. Develop/Test Sample Management System
Supporting the data collection effort is a sample management system. This program
provides the status for each piece of sample selected for inclusion in the study throughout the
course of the study. It is structured such that the key activities take place in a time-sensitive
manner - for example, that the mailing addresses are provided to the staff preparing the advance
letters such that the letters are mailed 4 days prior to the survey call. In addition, the status of the
sample in terms of call outcomes is tracked carefully as well. Although not an issue for the pilot,
this system will be critical for ensuring that respondents recruited for Round 1 testing are
reminded in a timely manner.
Subtask H. Recruit and Train Interviewers
A team of experienced interviewers will be assembled to staff the project. Because of the
nature of the survey and the importance of the incentives test in laying the foundation for the full
study, the study will use more experienced interviewers.
A training manual will be developed that includes the background on the project, the
objectives of the study, and a question-by-question guide to what is being asked of the
respondents. This includes definitions of the various incentives and the levels being tested. All
interviewers will receive a briefing as well as spend 2 hours conducting mock interviews before
actually beginning the survey process. All training will be monitored and only those staff that
exhibit mastery of the task will be allowed to conduct the survey.
Subtask I. Commence Pretest Recruitment
Approximately 100 households will be interviewed for this study, over the course of a
week. During the course of interviewing, the outcomes for all calls will be carefully tracked.
Interviewing will take place in two stages:
1. Regular Completes. These are households that are contacted and agree to
participate in the incentives test survey. We anticipate 90 out of the 100
households to fall into this category.
2. Soft Refusals. Some households that are contacted may not be interested in
participating due to concerns about legitimacy, other time commitments, or a
general lack of interest in the study. Those that are adamant about not
participating will be coded as "hard refusals", while others will express
21
-------
reluctance, but not in a rude manner. These are termed "soft refusals."
Approximately 3 days after the contact that was designated as a soft refusal, an
interviewer will make a follow-up call to the household and immediately offer a
cash incentive of $20 to participate in the survey. Upon agreement, the same
survey would be administered. The home address would be confirmed to ensure
the $20 incentive reaches the participant, then the incentive would be mailed out
the day following the interview, with a short note of thanks.
SubtaskJ. Process pretest data for analysis
The data from the survey incentives test will be processed into a master file, with flags to
identify the regular vs. soft refusal completes, the various geodemographic groups, and any other
identifying characteristics of the household that will support the analysis.
SubtaskK. Recommendations based on pilot
The results will be analyzed and a document prepared that summarizes the preferred
incentives, how those preferences vary across the respondent groups, and the anticipated cost
associated with the preferred incentives. The result will be the identification of several
recruitment packages with a sensible incentive costs to be offered during the vehicle recruitment
phase.
2.3.2 Cohort/Vehicle Analysis (Section 5.2.2)
2.3.2.1 Cohort Frame Analysis (Section 5.2.2.a)
Our proposed approach stipulates that 2,000 households in the Kansas City Metropolitan
Statistical Area (KCMSA) will be randomly selected to participate in the study using random
digit dialing methodology. The RDD sample will be obtained from a nationally recognized
vendor, Marketing System Group. They will provide random numbers to those exchanges that
are known to have working residential telephone numbers. This approach presumes that the
sampling frame of households with telephones can provide a representative sample of vehicles
from the KC area, as well as from individuals who operate these vehicles, since owners often
affect the performance of their vehicles (with respect to emissions) through maintenance
patterns, driving styles, and driving patterns .
The frame analysis will also take into consideration the desired stratification (socio-
demographic and vehicular segments) required for the sample to reflect the KC MSA. This will
be assessed using MARC survey data from the ongoing KC travel survey. The data set from that
survey can be used to assess the representation of the RDD sample according to population
demographics as well as fleet characteristics. Note that the MARC data is being used as a
22
-------
supplement to the purchased sample from Marketing Systems Group. NuStats believes that
relying solely on the MARC sample might introduce bias, because it would likely recruit
participants who are already predisposed to participating in surveys. In addition, the MARC
sample is limited in terms of number of households available to call. For these reasons, our
sampling plan for recruitment of our Cohort Frame combines both MARC data and the
purchased sample.
The methodology will be documented in a memorandum that documents the sample
design, stratification used, associated costs, and restrictions in use, if any.
2.3.2.2 Cohort Recruitment (Respondent/Non-respondent) Analysis
(Section 5.2.2.b)
Participants will be recruited via RDD sampling of the Kansas City (KC) metropolitan
area. Such samples are geographically and demographically representative of the KC
population. Recruitment will screen respondents on vehicle information (e.g., make, model,
year, user) and household demographic information (e.g., age, gender, and other socio-
demographic variables). Demographic data is available for the MARC sample, but not the
purchased sample. In cases where demographic information is unknown, NuStats will use US
Census-based zip code data to impute these key variables for the analysis, rather than directly
inquiring of participants. Recruitment will be monitored to watch for stratification quotas,
nonresponse, and other issues. Assessments for nonresponse or quota adjustments (to the
interview tool) will be made as necessary. The process for recruitment and any necessary
adjustments will be documented in a vehicle/cohort recruitment memorandum.
Because we will be recruiting vehicles from participating households of an RDD sample
survey, our underlying assumption is that the distribution of recruited vehicles from these
households will be highly representative of the KC vehicle fleet. This assumption will be
assessed empirically by comparing the pool of cohort sample vehicles with the known
distributions of the KC vehicle fleet obtained from extant data.
2.3.3 Cohort/Vehicle Fleet Analysis (Section 5.2.3)
The final cohort sample resulting from the cohort recruitment will be compared to the
KCMSA fleet with respect to vehicle distribution patterns by year, model, and make. (Cohort
recruitment comparison to the national fleet may be necessary if obtaining registration
information proves problematic). The analysis will assess the degree in which the three
populations differ to confirm that the cohort sample is representative of the KCMSA fleet as a
23
-------
whole. This analysis will be documented in a cohort/fleet analysis memorandum including
methodology, databases used for KCSMA and national fleets, and analysis approach.
2.3.4 Cohort/Vehicle Emission Analysis (Section 5.2.4)
Upon completion of the vehicle emissions testing, a comparative analysis of the cohort
data and the regional Kansas City fleet will be conducted. The methodology, data, and statistical
analysis will be described in a memorandum.
2.3.5 Cohort/Vehicle Summary Analysis (Section 5.2.5)
A report summarizing tasks 2.3.1 - 2.3.4 will be prepared that compares the chosen
cohort for the testing program with the cohort fleet. Sampling biases and other issues related to
using the sampling cohort as the recruitment population will be addressed. The report will
provide conclusive judgment on the value of the cohort sample for vehicle recruitment.
2.3.6 Vehicle Recruitment Sample Plan (Section 5.2.6)
Using the cohort sample, the core sample of 480 vehicles to participate in the study will
be drawn. For round 1, 170 vehicles will be recruited from the cohort and 80 vehicles from the
non-response households. For Round 2 vehicle recruitment, 230 different vehicles from the
cohort will be recruited along with 25 vehicles from Round 1 for retesting.
2.3.7 Vehicle Recruitment (Section 5.2.7)
SubtaskA. Revise Survey Instrument
Based on the incentives packets and the respondent reactions to the study descriptions
provided during the pilot test, the recruitment instrument will be finalized and translated into
Spanish. The recruitment interview is anticipated to average 10 minutes in length. It will begin
with a description of the program, obtain household address and vehicle information, and secure
agreement for testing (in a hypothetical manner). The outcome of each call attempt will be
tracked and the sample thoroughly dialed according to industry standards. A "completed"
recruitment interview is one in which the household agrees to be scheduled (if selected),
provides all key fleet characteristics, and provides/confirms a valid home address. NuStats will
use census data for given zip code to impute key demographic variables for the analysis.
Sufficient households will be recruited to ensure that 480 vehicles are tested. We estimate that
2,000 households will have to be recruited to ensure that 480 vehicles conforming to the data
collection goals are tested in Rounds 1 and 2.
24
-------
For those households contacted who decide not to participate, the survey will include a
few questions about that decision, to be attempted for all refusers. This information will most
likely include home address, gender (observed), and household vehicle information.
Subtask B. Finalize Data Collection Protocols
Data collection protocols will be adjusted to accommodate the refocus from incentives
testing to household recruitment. Again, the surveys will be administered using CATI
technology (which implicitly contains the criteria for when particular questions will be asked and
how the recruitment process will be managed). The corresponding sample management
protocol, interviewer training, and survey administration details will be summarized prior to the
start of recruitment. This also includes the timing of the advance mailing.
Given the requirement that a portion of the vehicles tested must come from households
that initially refuse to participate, the treatment of soft refusals will be documented and pre-
programmed. This includes details regarding when a callback is made, how the sample will be
identified for treatment by specially trained interviewers, and how the refusal-conversion
respondents "availability" designation differs from a regular recruit so that progress towards the
different testing goals can be monitored.
Subtask C. Finalize Survey Materials
The advance notification mailing will be revised to focus on the key points that the pilot
respondents found important. This letter will be signed by an EPA official, preferably one from
the Kansas City region, and contain contact information for the EPA project manager as well as
the NuStats Project Manager.
Following the recruitment call, households that agree to be scheduled will be mailed a
packet containing more details about the vehicle testing program. This might include statistics
about the levels of pollutants in the Kansas City region and what that means for the regional
residents (we would like to discuss with EPA the possibility of obtaining and using one of their
existing brochures for this purpose), what the testing will achieve, how households will be
selected and what will be required of participating households. We will also consider other small
"tokens of appreciation," as survey literature indicates that pre-payment of a small incentive has
a positive effect on response rates. This follow-up package will only be sent to those households
sampled for testing in Round 1 and Round 2, and will be mailed approximately 4 days prior to
the scheduling call.
25
-------
SubtaskD. Finalize CATIProgram and Test Logic
The CATI recruitment program will be finalized and tested to ensure it conforms to the
skip logic.
Subtask E. Finalize Sample Management System
The sample management system will be critical for timely interaction with the recruited
households. On any given day, the program will identify households to be mailed the advance
notification, those that should be contacted for recruitment, those eligible for scheduling, and
those that require reminder calls for upcoming appointments. A portion of the program will be
set to receive schedule outcome updates from BKI (so that real time tracking of actual tested
vehicles by goals is maintained, as well as the rates of attrition between those that agreed to
testing vs. those that actually completed the testing process).
Subtask F. Recruit and Train Interviewers
A team of experienced interviewers will be assembled to staff the project. Because of the
nature of the survey and the importance of securing valid agreements for the testing process, the
interviewers will focus on obtaining solid commitments and their training will reflect that need to
discern respondent reactions.
A training manual will be developed that includes the background on the project, the
objectives of the study, and a question-by-question guide on what is being asked of the
respondents. It will show the detailed data collection process, from advance mailing to
recruitment, scheduling, and reminder calls, as well as how the recruitment feeds into the two
rounds of recruitment. This document will also include definitions of the various incentives and
the levels being offered, as well as explicit detail regarding how the incentives will be
administered and under what circumstances. All interviewers will receive a briefing as well as
spend two hours conducting mock interviews before actually beginning the survey process. All
training will be monitored and only those staff exhibiting mastery of the task will be allowed to
conduct the survey.
Subtask G. Issue Advance Letters to Households
Four days prior to the dialing of specific sample, advance letters will be mailed to
households identified as being ready for the recruitment call. As discussed in an earlier task, this
letter will focus on study objectives and purpose, provide a contact to verify legitimacy, and be
written such that the importance of participating is paramount. It will be signed by an EPA staff
26
-------
person, preferably one from the Kansas City region and provide contact information for the EPA
project manager and the NuStats project manager.
Subtask H. Recruitment Operations/Calling
Recruitment will take place on a daily basis, with households being identified based on
the fleet characteristics that will guide the selection of households for scheduling. The best
timing of the recruitment call will be adjusted based on respondent reaction and the exact
number of days between recruitment, scheduling, and the actual appointments in order to
maximize participation levels. Real time progress towards the vehicle testing goals will be
monitored using the CATI reporting functions.
Subtask I. Process Recruitment Data
At the conclusion of each shift, the data will be extracted and appended to the master
sample management system.
2.3.7.1 Vehicle Recruitment (Round 1) (Section 5.2.7a)
Subtask J. Sample Vehicles for Round 1 Recruiting
The cohort analysis conducted in the previous task will be used to select vehicles for
testing from among the fleet represented by the recruited households. Sufficient vehicles will be
identified to ensure that the correct distribution of 480 vehicles is obtained. This distribution is
shown in Table 2-1, which is derived from Table 1 in the SOW.
Table 2-1. Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum
Stratum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Vehicle
Class
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Age Class
Pre 1980
1980-1990
1991-1995
1996 and newer
Pre 1980
1980-1990
1991-1995
1996 and newer
Total Vehicles
Tested
50
100
70
40
40
50
80
50
480
Regular
Responders
42
84
58
33
33
42
66
42
400
Refusers
8
16
12
7
7
8
14
8
80
It is anticipated that 300 households will need to be sampled to result in 80 vehicles
tested. For the regular respondents, we anticipate sampling 1,000 to 1,500 households to
complete the 400 tests.
27
-------
For Round 1, the testing will include all 80 refuser vehicles and 170 of the 400 regular
responder vehicles, for a total of 250 vehicles tested. In Round 2, the goal will be to retest 25 of
the 250 vehicles plus 230 vehicles from the regular responder households. Table 2-2 presents a
summary of vehicles recruited and tests performed for each round.
Table 2-2. Estimated Number of Vehicles Recruited and Test Performed
Different Vehicles Tests
Round 1
Positive Respondents from Cohort 170 170
Replicate Vehicle Tests 0 15
Non-respondent from Cohort" 80 80
Weekly calibration vehicle testb 0 12
Total 250 277
Round 2
Positive Respondents from Cohort 230 230
Non-respondent from Cohort" 0 0
Replicate Vehicle Tests 0 10
Repeat Vehicles from Round lb 25 25
Weekly calibration vehicle testb 0 12
Total 255 277
a see Section 3.1.3 for description of this activity.
b see Section 3.2.3 for description of this activity.
Total vehicles includes non-response assessment.
Subtask K. Contact Households and Schedule Appointments
Selected households for the first round will be re-contacted and scheduled for vehicle
testing. Prior to the start of scheduling operations, a detailed schedule would be developed that
includes all valid testing dates, the appointment "slots" for each date, and a unique identification
number for each slot on each day. This production plan is critical for ensuring successful
recruitment and scheduling, as it would trigger when the advance letters are mailed as well as
ensure the reminder calls be made on a timely basis. Each time slot will have a maximum cap on
how many households can be scheduled, to ensure a steady flow of appointments. Once a
particular time slot has been filled, households will be directed to the next available time slot (the
CATI program will automatically track households in each time slot and "close" each once the
maximum is reached). Ultimately, households will be scheduled for the most convenient time
slot among those available.
28
-------
Scheduling will take place at sufficient levels in order to ensure that 250 vehicles are
tested in this round. Of the 250 vehicles, 170 will come from households that respond positively
to the survey effort and 80 will come from those that initially refused but were "converted" after
a follow-up call and using a different incentive (see 2.3.6 above). It will be critical for BKI to
report daily on actual testings completed to ensure that scheduling is at the right level (not too
many and not too few households) and stratum goals are being fulfilled as planned. Recruitment
estimates will be adjusted daily based on feedback from BKI.
Scheduling calls will take place about a week prior to the appointments, and followed-up
with reminder calls the day/evening prior to the appointment. Reminder calls will be critical to
ensuring the proper flow of vehicles at the testing facility. They will be short (2 minutes) and
exclusively for the purpose of reminding the household about their testing appointment and the
promised incentive. Reminder calls will be attempted for all scheduled households.
Subtask L. Provide Appointment Schedule to Test Facility
Appointment summaries will be prepared and sent to BKI, along with summary reports
tracking participation by key variables. The home address information will be used for delivery
of the incentive to the household (some incentives may be provided to BKI for delivery at the
time the household keeps the appointment, others may be provided directly to the household
through the mail).
In addition, an appointment reminder postcard will be drafted if the pilot respondents
indicated it would be useful.
Subtask M. Comparative Analysis of Tested Vehicles
Statistical tests will be used to confirm that there were no differences in the vehicles that
were tested vs. those that were sampled for testing.
Subtask N. Develop Analytic Weights
Weights will be developed to compensate for non-response analysis, as well as to adjust
the results to represent the overall vehicle fleet in the Kansas City region.
Subtask O. Methodology Report on Round 1
A report documenting the efforts of Round 1 recruitment, scheduling, and impact on the
incentives will be prepared and submitted.
29
-------
2.3.7.2 Vehicle Recruitment (Round 2) (Section 5.2.7b)
Subtask P. Review Vehicle Data of Agreeing Households
The status of data collection at the end of Round 1 will be reviewed against the data
collection goals listed in Table 2-1. This will assist in the determination of which households to
sample.
Subtask Q. Sample Vehicles for Round 1 Re-testing
The goal is to retest 25 vehicles from Round 1. The purpose of this task is to randomly
sample 100 households from Round 1 to recontact for purposes of achieving that goal. Table 2-3
presents the estimated sample sizes for the Round 2 re-testing .
Table 2-3. Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum for Round 2 Re-Testing
Stratum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Vehicle
Class
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Age Class
Pre 1980
1980 - 1990
1991 -1995
1996 and newer
Pre 1980
1980 - 1990
1991 -1995
1996 and newer
Sample Size
(«/,)'
3
5
3
2
2
o
5
4
o
3
25
1 Number of randomly selected vehicles tested during Round 1 re-tested during Round 2.
Subtask R. Sample vehicles for Round 2 Testing
Sufficient vehicles (and their associated households) will be sampled from the recruited
households to ensure that 230 vehicles will be tested during the 2nd round of the study (see 2.3.6
above).
Subtask S. Contact Households and Schedule Appointments
Selected households for the second round will be re-contacted and scheduled for vehicle
testing. As with Round 1, prior to the start of scheduling operations, a detailed schedule would
be developed that includes all valid testing dates, the appointment "slots" for each date, and a
unique identification number for each slot on each day. This production plan is critical for
ensuring successful recruitment and scheduling, as it would trigger when the advance letters are
mailed as well as ensure the reminder calls be made on a timely basis. Each time slot will have a
maximum cap on how many households can be scheduled, to ensure a steady flow of
appointments. Once a particular time slot has been filled, households will be directed to the next
30
-------
available time slot (the CATI program will automatically track households in each time slot and
"close" each once the maximum is reached). Ultimately, households will be scheduled for the
most convenient time slot among those available.
Scheduling will take place at sufficient levels in order to ensure that 255 vehicles are
tested in this round. Of the 255 vehicles, 25 will come from vehicles that underwent testing in
Round 1 and the remaining 230 will come from those that were recruited earlier in the year (see
2.3.6 above). Given the passage of time since the initial recruitment, the scheduling interview
will be longer, as it will be necessary to confirm the demographic and fleet information for each
household.
Again, it will be critical for BKI to report daily on actual testings completed to ensure
that scheduling is at the right level (not too many and not too few households) and stratum goals
are being fulfilled as planned. Recruitment estimates will be adjusted daily based on feedback
from BKI.
Scheduling calls will take place about a week prior to the appointments (or at whatever
length was found to work best in Round 1), and followed-up with reminder calls the day/evening
prior to the appointment. Reminder calls will be critical to ensuring the proper flow of vehicles
at the testing facility. They will be short (2 minutes) and exclusively for the purpose of
reminding the household about their testing appointment and the promised incentive. Reminder
calls will be attempted for all scheduled households.
Subtask T. Provide Appointment Schedule to Test Facility
Appointment summaries will be prepared and sent to BKI, along with summary reports
tracking participation by key variables. The home address information will be used for delivery
of the incentive to the household (some incentives may be provided to BKI for delivery at the
time the household keeps the appointment, others may be provided directly to the household
through the mail).
Subtask U. Comparative Analysis of Tested Vehicles
Statistical tests will be used to confirm that there were no differences in the vehicles that
were tested vs. those that were sampled for testing.
31
-------
Subtask V. Develop Analytic Weights
Weights will be developed to compensate for non-response analysis, as well as to adjust
the results to represent the overall vehicle fleet in the Kansas City region.
Subtask W. Methodology Report on Round 2
A report documenting the efforts of Round 2 recruitment, scheduling, and ultimate results
of the recruitment effort.
2.3.8 Non-Response Assessment (Section 5.2.8)
A critical component of this study is to determine the presence and extent of bias
introduced into the survey by non-response. Using the original survey of respondents, this task
will draw approximately 340 non-respondents with the goal of convincing 80 of these
households to respond and agree to have their vehicles tested. The number of vehicles to target
in each stratum for the non-response analysis will be proportional to the vehicles recruited for the
total population - as shown in Table 2-4 below.
Table 2-4. Estimated Sample Sizes by Stratum for Non-Respondent Testing
Stratum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Vehicle
Class
Truck
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Age Class
Pre 1980
1980 - 1990
1991 -1995
1996 and newer
Pre 1980
1980 - 1990
1991 -1995
1996 and newer
Sample Size
(»*)'
8
16
12
7
7
8
14
8
80
1 Number of randomly selected vehicles tested for the non-response assessment.
A list of non-respondent criteria will be developed (e.g., those classified as a "hard"
refusal during the original survey along with those households refusing to answer questions
critical for stratification and analysis) and submitted to EPA for approval. In addition, criteria to
achieve a high participate rate for non-respondents will also be submitted to EPA for approval.
Vehicles will be recruited to participate in the program, and the results from these 80
respondents will be compared with the 400 respondents to determine the presence of any non-
response bias. Findings will be reported in a non-response memorandum at the conclusion of the
Phase I study.
32
-------
2.3.9 Participation Incentives (Section 5.2.9)
The appropriate mix of incentive packages for use in recruiting study participants (for
participants and non-respondents) will be identified during the pilot test. Incentives will be
disbursed upon participant completion of the necessary paperwork at the test center. On a
monthly basis, a memorandum documenting of the incentive disbursements will be submitted to
the EPA Project Officer. This report will document the total amounts disbursed for all incentive
packages. When 75% of the allotted incentive funds have been paid out, the EPA Project Officer
will be notified. Examples of possible incentives are presented in Table 2-5 below.
Table 2-5. Incentives
Type of Incentives Incentive Cost
Cash $200 (if using a rental vehicle)
$275 (for not using a rental vehicle)
Full Tank of Gasoline $25
Rental Vehicle $75 (for up to three days)
Car Wash (possible) $10
PEMS / PAMS Use $50
Total $360
2.3.10 Post Round 1 Vehicle Analysis (Section 5.2.10)
Following round 1 testing, regulated and PM mass emission results, as well as vehicle
data, will be compiled and submitted in a report for review by the EPA Project Officer and
Sponsors. This report will also include an evaluation of the data, and document any known
problems and concerns that were encountered in round 1, including vehicle processing and
conditioning, testing, and emissions sampling and analysis. If problems are identified,
suggestions will be offered for improving the affected processes. The goal of this analysis and
report are to identify and correct issues related to the quality of data being generated that were
not identified before or during the course of round 1.
33
-------
2.4 Vehicle Testing Task (Section 5.3)
BKI will provide vehicle-testing services to the project for the pilot study and the
intensive 2-part field study. Chassis dynamometer vehicle emissions testing will be conducted
according to a protocol developed for the transportable dynamometer by EPA/ORD/NERL.
2.4.1 Pilot Vehicle Testing Task (Section 5.3.1)
BKI will provide technical support for the calibration, operation and maintenance of a
portable chassis dynamometer, associated driver's aid, constant volume sampler (CVS),
analytical bench, and data acquisition/reduction system. This system is used to obtain exhaust
emission samples in the field. In addition, BKI will support the calibration, operation, and
maintenance of other sampling and measuring equipment as specified in the SOW descriptions.
BKI will comply with all EPA health and safety, environmental, waste handling, and other
applicable work rules. BKI will also follow proper laboratory, field testing, and vehicle testing
practices for all work required by the SOW. BKI will adhere to all applicable standard operating
procedures and the QA/QC procedures recommended therein. BKI will notify the ERG Project
Manager, the Project Officer, and WAM immediately if it encounters any equipment failures that
cannot be readily remedied by the contractor or technical problems that may impact the quality
or on-time delivery of deliverables, or if any required equipment or supplies are unavailable to
accomplish the required work under this SOW. Specific subtasks for the pilot vehicle testing are
described in detail below.
SubtaskA. Prepare Work Plan for Pilot Study
The ERG team has prepared a Work Plan (this document) for submittal, describing the
tasks and subtasks to be performed. Applicable Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) and
Quality Management Plans (QMPs) will also be submitted as part of this task.
Subtask B. Protective Covering for Equipment and Vehicles, Test Site Selection
BKI and ERG will identify an industrial warehouse in the Kansas City Metropolitan area
for the testing of the recruited vehicles. This will also better protect the analytical equipment
from the elements and provide stable electrical power. This will allow the analytical equipment
to be continually powered up which eliminates warm-up times. The location identified has large
drive in doors for ease of equipment setup and for ease of entry for the test vehicles as well as
increased ventilation. The test area with all doors open will allow for the overnight soaking of
test vehicles at ambient conditions and will allow the background levels to be maintained at
ambient levels while testing.
34
-------
Subtask C. Prepare and Transport Dynamometer and Analytical Trailer
BKI staff will prepare and transport the transportable dynamometer and analytical trailer
to the Kansas City test site. Before transport the dynamometer system will be inspected and
packed for shipment. All components and analytical equipment will be strapped down and
secured for over the road transportation. The transportable test cell includes a Clayton model
CTE 50-0 water brake chassis dynamometer mounted on a Freuhauf trailer. The dynamometer is
coupled to a Clayton direct drive variable inertia flywheel system allowing vehicle testing at
inertia weights of 1750, 2000, 2250, 2500, 2750, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, and 5500
pounds. Vehicle road load (Hp @ 50 MPH) is manually set using the driver's pendant switch.
All utilities necessary for dynamometer operation (compressed air, cooling water, and
electrical power distribution) are self-contained on the trailer. A compressor provides
compressed air for operation of the dynamometer's roll brake, vehicle lift, and flywheel clutches.
Compressed air is also available at each corner of the trailer via quick-disconnect fittings for
adjusting test vehicle tire pressure. A closed-loop water system provides the dynamometer's
power absorption unit with both cooling and load water. The water system includes a SPA pump,
a 12 gallon storage tank, and a liquid to air heat exchanger. The water system is normally filled
with a 50/50 mixture of water and antifreeze to prevent freeze damage in colder weather. The air
compressor and water system are electrically wired into the test cells electrical power
distribution box. Electrical outlets, also wired to the power distribution box, are located
underneath the trailer for miscellaneous equipment with eitherl 10 VAC and 220 VAC power
requirements.
Subtask D. Transport EPA Correlation Vehicles and Fuel to Kansas City Test Site
BKI will provide for the transportation of the EPA correlation vehicles, fuel, and oil from
Ann Arbor, MI. to the Kansas City test site and back to Ann Arbor, MI. after the study
concludes. The vehicles will be placed on a motor carrier and delivered after the transportable
dynamometer is initially setup. After testing the vehicles will be returned to the EPA Ann Arbor
facility.
Subtask E. Off-Load and Setup Dynamometer, Analytical Trailer, and Associated
Sampling Equipment
BKI staff will off-load, setup, and calibrate the dynamometer, analytical trailer, and
associated sampling equipment on its arrival at the Kansas City test site. A wrecker will be
obtained to move both the dynamometer and analytical trailer from the flat-bed trailers and into
the industrial warehouse. After positioning both trailers BKI staff will begin removing and
35
-------
setting up the interconnecting equipment. Electrical service will be connected to both the
transportable dynamometer and analytical bench and 3 phase power will be connected to the
dilution tunnel heater.
Subtask F: Maintain & Calibrate Dynamometer, Analytical Trailer, and Associated
Sampling Equipment
BKI will maintain the transportable dynamometer to make real-world emission
measurements in the field and the laboratory. BKI staff will repair the equipment on an as-
needed basis. If the system requires modifications, approval by the EPA Project Officer is
required beforehand. BKI staff will calibrate the transportable dynamometer, analytical
equipment and associated sampling equipment after setup has been completed and all systems
prove to be operational. The Positive Displacement Pump-Constant Volume Sampling (PDP-
CVS) system used to dilute and transport the vehicle tailpipe exhaust to analyzers during the test
will be calibrated as described in the SOP. Coastdowns will be performed on the Clayton
dynamometer that is coupled to a direct drive variable inertia flywheel system allowing vehicle
testing at inertia weights of 1750, 2000, 2250, 2500, 2750, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, and
5500 pounds. Vehicle road load (Hp @ 50 MPH) is manually set using the driver's pendant
switch. The regulated emission analyzers will be calibrated according to the SOP. The dilute
THC concentrations will be determined using a heated flame ionization. The detector analyzer
calibration curve should cover the range of 0 ppmC to 3,000 ppmC. Likewise, CO
concentrations will be determined using non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) analyzers. CO analysis
should cover a range of 0 ppm to 10,000 ppm (1.0%). In order to meet this calibration curve, two
CO analyzers are typically required - one from 0 to 1000 ppm, and one from 0 to 10,000 ppm
(1%) CO. CO2 concentrations are also determined using a NDIR analyzer. CO2 analysis should
cover a range of 0 ppm to 50,000 ppm (5%). NOx concentrations will be determined using a
chemiluminescence analyzer. The NOx measurement must include the sum of nitrogen oxide and
nitrogen dioxide. This determination can be completed satisfactorily by calibrating and running
the chemiluminescence analyzer in NO only mode, and multiplying the result by 1.03. This
eliminates the need for the converter and flow balance. The NOx analysis should cover a range
of 0 ppm to 700 ppm.
Subtask G. Interface Study Specific Analytical Equipment
BKI will supply the interface for the study specific equipment used for EPA-AA real time
PM samplers and DRI gaseous and PM samplers. These heated dilution tunnel ports and probes
will allow isokinetic flows for the continuous and integrated air measurements to be extracted
36
-------
from the dilution tunnel. BKI staff will also supply the interface for the second-by-second speed
time trace for the incorporation into the real-time PM measurements.
SubtaskH. Test Dynamometer and Analytical Systems with Control Vehicle
After the analytical systems are setup and flows calibrated, BKI staff will test the
dynamometer and analytical equipment using a control vehicle. This will allow the onsite
scientists to calculate the delay times and make the correction in their data spreadsheets. When
the corrections have been performed the control vehicle will be ran until all systems are
performing as required.
Subtaskl. Determine and Develop Protocol for Dilution Tunnel to Minimize the Effects of
HC Entrainment
BKI will conduct a series of experiments that will determine if 10 hours of tunnel purging
is required to achieve a stable dilution tunnel operation. After the designated control vehicle is
disconnected from the dilution tunnel transfer tube, the degradation of PM and total hydrocarbon
can be monitored on a second by second basis using the real-time PM monitors and the total
hydrocarbon instrument. These tests will also be performed on a high emitting vehicle to
determine the length of time required to assure that background levels are obtained before testing
is resumed.
When this experiment is concluded and results are reviewed, BKI will document and
change if necessary, procedures to ensure proper emission measurements for the testing program.
BKI will update its SOP to represent any changes in the procedure resulting from the finding.
SubtaskJ. Test EPA Correlation Vehicles
BKI will test the correlation vehicles provided by EPA at the Kansas City site. Because
testing is being performed under ambient conditions (outdoor conditions) all tests will be
conducted as close to the Federal Procedure and the previously performed EPA Ann Arbor tests
as possible. Also, the same fuel and oil will be used for performing the tests on the correlation
vehicles. BKI is expecting at least 3 vehicles ranging from a newer lower mileage vehicle, an
intermediate aged and mileage vehicle, and/or an older high emitting vehicle. Test vehicles will
be preconditioned on the first day and tested on consecutive days for at least 3 times each. This
data will be compared to the results obtained from tests performed in the EPA laboratory in the
EPA-AA location. Comparisons will also be performed on tests without heat or humidity
control.
37
-------
SubtaskK. Evaluate Test Results and Report Data
Immediately after the correlation vehicles have been tested BKI will begin evaluating the
emission data. Within one month after the completion of the correlation vehicle tests the data
will be reported. This report will include emission rates obtained for regulated pollutants from
any vehicles tested during the pilot study. All documents will be prepared using a version of
Microsoft Word or Wordperfect unless otherwise specified in the task order. Electronic media
materials will be delivered on 3 /^ " disks, CD-R, DVD, or hard drive. BKI will develop and
maintain files supporting the requirements of each task. This data will be reported to ERG for
the inclusion of PM data for the final reporting to EPA's Project Officer and sponsors for use in
their evaluating the results obtained in the pilot study.
SubtaskL. Document and Change Procedures and Methods in QAPP
When the Pilot Study portion of the program is concluded and results are reviewed, BKI
will document and change, if necessary, procedures and methods, quality assurance and quality
control procedures, and data management procedures to be used in the actual in-use vehicle
testing project to ensure the proper emission measurements for the testing program.
2.4.2 Vehicle Testing Task (Specialized Sampling and Analytical Needs) (Section
5.3.2)
The project will characterize gaseous and PM exhaust emissions from the test vehicles in
accordance with the testing and sample analysis procedures described in Task 5.4. PM
continuous and integrated air measurements will be extracted from the BKI dilution tunnel
through a low particulate loss 2.5 um cut point pre-classifier. The sample will be isokinetically
partitioned among the continuous instruments and integrated air samples using a suitable sample
distribution manifold. Continuous measurements include the following instruments to be
supplied by the EPA: Brooker Systems Model RPM-101 Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM),
and Thermo-MIE Inc. DataRam 4000 Nephelometer. In addition, we will supply a DRI
photoacoustic instrument for determination of black carbon mass concentrations. Parameters
determined from the integrated samples include PM gravimetric mass, elements, elemental and
organic carbon, ions, particulate and semi-volatile organic compounds (all compounds in Table
12 of the RFP plus methylated-PAHs and oxy-PAHs, and as an option, nitro-PAHs), volatile
organic air toxics (benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethylbenzene, styrene, 1,3-butadiene, n-hexane,
naphthalene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein and MTBE. Vehicle testing and sample
analysis procedures are described in Task 5.4.
38
-------
We recognize that not all of the samples specified for collection in Table 7 and 8 of the
RFP can be analyzed due to budget limitations. As requested in the RFP, a budget for complete
chemical analysis of 50 vehicles is provided. This budget provides for collection of all samples
specified in Tables 7 and 8 of the RFP and determination of gravimetric mass for all Teflon
filters and analysis of a corresponding proportion (i.e., 50/554) of the blank samples specified in
Table 8 of the RFP. In similar sampling programs in the past, various compositing approaches
were used to reduced analysis cost without adversing affecting project goals and objectives.
These approaches are described in this section.
Recent study such as the U.S. Department of Energy's Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study
and the Northern Front Range Air Quality Study have shown that newer, low mileage gasoline
vehicles are low PM emitters. Figure 2-7 shows the distribution of light-duty gasoline vehicle
PM2.5 mass emission rates by ten model year and mileage categories (Gabele et al, 2003). Figure
2-8 shows the distribution of the same data by ascending mileage accumulation and vehicle age.
Of the 57 vehicles tested, all of the 16 vehicles with less than 98K miles and all of the 31
vehicles newer than 11 years had emission rates less than 20 mg/mi. Several vehicles were
sampled on the same sampling media for the four cleanest categories in order to improve the
signal to blank ratios. We refer to this sampling approach as "media composites" as opposed to a
"sample composite", which involves combining several samples by extracting several samples
together or by other means prior to chemical analysis. Figure 2-7 also shows that fewer samples
were composited for chemical analysis for older, high mileage vehicles. The rationale for
compositing approach used in these prior studies reflected budget limitations and limits of
analytical sensitivities for various sampling media and analytical methods.
Table 2-6 gives estimate mass loadings for a range of PM mass emission rates by
applying suitable parameters for the BKI portable dynamometer, driving cycle, and our various
sampling systems. Based upon these estimates, most vehicles newer than ten years and with
mileage accumulations less than 100K would yield mass loading well below the optimum target
loadings of 200 |j,g per sample for carbon analysis and 1 mg per sample for all other analyses.
Accordingly, we recommend a combination of media and sample composites. Test vehicles were
recruited during the Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study by vehicle category starting with the newest
vehicles with low mileage. This was especially important during the first four categories that
involved media composites. In these cases, about four vehicles were composited. However, for
the present study, vehicles will be brought to the testing facility randomly among the eight
vehicle categories and collection of media composites will not be possible. In order to reduce the
39
-------
effect of media blanks, we propose to extract and analyze the filters and XAD samples (or
composites) separately for the two latest model year categories.
40
-------
Category #
200
1 5 0
100
5 0
o
o n n
0 e: (-)
200
1 s n
100
e; n
n
I
..1.
II
1
III
IV
V
1 B
VI
.1,. ..
,
59 Cars
VII
.1 .1.1
A
||
• •1
/I
I
I |
II
..
ii.
IX
1
.
1
1
1
X
ll.l
Illl
l.ll
Figure 2-7. Distribution of light-duty gasoline vehicle PM2.5 mass emission rates
by model year and mileage categories. Preliminary results from the DOE
Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study (Source: Gabele, 2003)
Category
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Model Year
1996 and newer
1993-95
1996 and newer
1990-92
1993-95
1990-92
1 986-89
1981-85
1980 and earlier
Smoker
LD Diesel
Odometer (miles)
low mileage (< 50,000)
low mileage (< 75,000)
high mileage (> 100,000)
lower mileage (< 100,000)
higher mileage (> 125,000)
> 125,000
> 125,000
> 125,000
> 125,000
no model year or odometer criteria
no model year or odometer criteria
Total
Number of
Vehicles
9
6
2
59
Number of
Composites
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
6
2
26
41
-------
900
1^0
B>
£,
.2
"ra 100
Qf iuu
0
'(/)
(A
P 50
ill
n
Ascending Mik
/dge • —
LSriKl
-•- ^S VX -L ^~^
\
1 nm^
18K
/
/
.•I ••_! . •
1 V7V7-TV
S
1. 1. ll_ _.__
1
270K
^
ilui
•I
9nn
"P 150
1
0)
5 100
fy ' uv-'
O
'55
(A
E 50
LJ
n
A J- A ^^
13 yrs
/
\
2 yrs 1 1 yrs
7 \ , ,
1
.. .ll . __. _.!.. .i.ll III.
32 yrs
\
II..IM
i
i
.ii,
Figure 2-8. Distribution of PM2.s emission rates by ascending mileage
accumulation and vehicle age. Preliminary results from the DOE Gasoline/Diesel
PM Split Study (Source: Gabele, 2003)
Note that the 16 vehicles with less than 98K miles and 31 vehicles newer than 11 years
had emission rates less than 20 mg/mi. (weighted emission rates).
42
-------
Table 2-6. Expected PM Mass Loadings for Light-Duty Vehicles
(micrograms per sample)
Sample
Teflon and Quartz
TIGF/XAD
Emission
Rate mg/mile
5
5
50
50
300
5
5
50
50
300
Flow Rate
(I/mm)
50
50
50
50
50
100
100
100
100
100
No. of
Composites
1
4
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
1
UC Phase
1 or 3
20
78
196
392
1177
39
157
392
784
2353
UC Phase
2
141
562
1405
2811
8433
281
1124
2811
5622
16866
UC Phases
1 plus 2
160
641
1602
3203
9609
320
1281
3203
6406
19219
Target of 1 mg/sample of PM for laboratory analysis except carbon measurements by TOT (200 ug/sample)
DRI will sample at 10 to 50 1pm depending on expected mass loading
Basis for Mass Loading Calculations
Parameters
Symbol
Units
UC Phase 1/3 UC Phase 2
UC Phase 1+
distance UCP1+P2
sample duration UC P1+P2
total diluted volume UC P1+P2
PM emission rate
sample volume
mass loading
sample volume
sample flow rate
average concentration
d
t
Vd
R
Vs
m
Vs
Q
c
miles L2 8.6 9.8
mn 5.0 18.9 23.9
m3 76.5 289.4 365.9
mg/mi 1 to 500
m3 ys = Q * t * 10"3
ug/sample m = R * d * 1000 * Vs/Vd
m3 ys = Q * t * 10"3
1/min 10 to 50 for Tef or Qtz, 100 for Organic
ug/m3 m/Vq
2.4.3 Vehicle Testing Task (Section 5.3.3)
This task includes vehicle check-in and inspections, vehicle conditioning, overnight soak
and cold start dynamometer emissions testing over three phases of the LA92 driving cycle with
determination of regulated emissions.
43
-------
2.4.3.1 Protective Covering for Equipment and Test Vehicles (Section
5.3.3.1)
Locations have been identified in the Kansas City Metropolitan area for protection of the
analytical testing equipment and the recruited vehicles. To better protect the analytical
equipment and the consumer's vehicles from the elements during a study of this magnitude, an
industrial warehouse is considered a better choice for testing. The locations identified have
drive-in doors for ease of the equipment setup and large loading dock doors that will remain
open for continuous ventilation of the area. Large overhead exhaust fans for additional
ventilation are also located in the roof of the vehicle test area. The identified areas will maintain
the test vehicles at ambient condition during its soak period and allow the background to be
maintained at the ambient levels while testing. The testing areas consist of about 10,000 square
feet plus additional office space for special analytical equipment setup. Since there could be up
to 15 participants' vehicles in the area at any given time, an area of this dimension would allow
orderly processing. A big advantage of using a well-ventilated industrial warehouse is the stable
source of electrical power available, including 3 phase 480 volt for the dilution tunnel heater.
This will allow analytical equipment to be powered up continually, eliminating instrument
warm-up time; therefore reducing the time the staff is required to be onsite before vehicle testing
can begin.
2.4.3.2 Vehicle Testing and Data Collection (Section 5.3.3.2)
The following subtasks describe procedures that will be undertaken during vehicle testing
and data collection.
SubtaskA. Vehicle Inspections
All vehicles will undergo body and mechanical inspections upon arrival at the test site.
These inspections will be performed to reduce to possibility of the owner complaining that the
car had been damaged during its testing. After inspections and answering the questionnaire, the
agreement and waiver will be signed by the participant and they will receive their incentive and a
rental vehicle. After these initial inspections and video, all vehicles with OBD1 and OBD2
systems will be scanned and the results reported along with the type of OBD system on the
vehicle. Detailed information on all vehicles will be obtained and recorded on a computerized
vehicle information form. Recorded information is not limited to but will include the following:
• Date and time of vehicle procurement
• Date and time of vehicle testing
44
-------
Test number
License plate number
Make
Model
Model year
Odometer reading
Vehicle identification number (VIN)
Engine displacement
Number of cylinders
Emission control and catalyst information
Vehicle registration status
Fuel and oil information
SubtaskB. Vehicle Conditioning
LA92 Driving Cycle
500
1000 1500
Time, seconds
2000
2500
After the vehicle has passed inspections, it will undergo conditioning on a predetermined
route. The conditioning route will contain multiple high speed accelerations, a minimum often
minutes of continuous high speed operation, and low speed operation and idling just prior to the
completion of the route. After conditioning, the vehicle will be staged for testing the next day
and soaked overnight at ambient conditions. If any abnormalities are found while vehicle
45
-------
conditioning (smoker, smell) it will be noted in the vehicle folder an entered in to the database
and staged for testing last vehicle of the test day.
Subtask C. Vehicle Testing
Vehicle exhaust testing will occur using the EPA Office of Research and Development
dynamometer under ambient conditions. Vehicles will be operated over the LA92 Unified
Driving Cycle consisting of a cold start Phase 1, (first 310 seconds) a stabilized Phase 2 (311-
1427 seconds) a 600 second engine off soak, and a warm start Phase 3 (repeat of Phase 1). A
positive displacement pump (PDP-CVS) operating at 540 scfm, will be used to quantitatively
dilute exhaust gas from the vehicle operating on the dynamometer through an eight-inch stainless
steel dilution tunnel. Dilution air will be dehumidified before it is treated with a charcoal bed
followed be a HEPA filter to remove particles prior to being heated 47°C +/- 5°C and mixed with
vehicle exhaust. Throughout the sample extraction and partition process, the temperature of the
sample air at the filter face will be maintained at 47°C +/- 5°C, and the sample air will held
within the specified humidity range.
As part of the tunnel conditioning process, the CVS and tunnel dilution air heater shall be
turned on for a number of hours prior to engine start (as determined during pilot testing) and run
to purge the exhaust transfer line and dilution tunnel. Pumps at the analytical bench shall be run
at least one hour prior to engine start to purge all sample lines. The CVS, tunnel heater and
sample pumps shall be kept running throughout the day and will not be shut down until the
conclusion of testing for that day. Testing shall not be started until the temperature in the dilution
tunnel has reached a stable value (no increase in temperature over a 3 minute period).
Within two (2) minutes of the start of the initial test of the day, background THC, CO,
NOx, and CO2 concentrations in the dilution tunnel shall be recorded by the regulated emissions
bench operator. These levels shall serve as reference background levels for the tests that
immediately follow that day. If prior to the start (within 2 minutes of start) of succeeding tests
that day, the background levels measured for that test differ from the reference background by
+/-15%, testing shall be delayed until corrective measures are taken. If the +/- 15% change in
background is due to a change in the ambient background level (not influenced by station
exhaust or spillage) and cannot be corrected, the testing may resume with a new set of reference
background levels. However, after each test, the ambient background levels shall be monitored
by the bench operator so that the reference background levels can be adjusted if ambient levels
continue to change.
46
-------
Background levels of THC from the tunnel filter shall also be monitored by the
instrument bench operator for fifteen (15) minutes before the start of a test. If the background
level of THC in the dilution tunnel differs by +/- 15% of the background level of THC after the
tunnel filter, the test shall be delayed until tunnel levels are adjusted accordingly.
Prior to placing the vehicle on the dynamometer, the proper load and inertia will be set by
motoring the dynamometer at SOmph. Vehicle inertia and horsepower loading for each vehicle
will be determined by a lookup table developed from the EPA Certified Vehicle Test Reports.
After these settings have been applied, the test vehicle will then be winched onto the
dynamometer, stabilized, and secured by the restraint system. During this time the CVS will
remain on to purge any residual PM and hydrocarbon from the system. The emissions tests will
be started when the background levels stabilize. The emission analysis system will sample and
record dilute exhaust THC, CO, CO2, and NOx concentrations in 1-second intervals during the
entire transit driving cycle. Temperature and pressure in the CVS, dynamometer speed, ambient
temperature, relative humidity, and barometric pressure will also be recorded in 1-second
intervals.
Two hundred and forty vehicles will be tested for each round of this study. Twenty-five
vehicles tested during the 1st round will be retested during the 2nd round of testing. These 25
vehicles will be randomly selected from each stratum as required. There will be 15 replicate
vehicle tests performed in the Round 1 test phase and 10 replicate tests performed during the
Round 2 test phase. Also, there will be a weekly calibration/correlation vehicle tested each week
during both Round 1 & 2.
Subtask D. Vehicle Fluid Sampling
BKI will collect fuel and oil samples from all feasible vehicles after the dynamometer
tests for analysis. These fuel and oil samples will be transferred to ERG staff onsite and will be
maintained for 2 years after the study is complete for possible future analysis.
Subtask E. Maintenance of Emission Equipment
BKI staff will provide for the maintenance, calibration, and operation of the transportable
dynamometer and its associated sampling and analytical equipment. Manufacturer's
recommendations and SOPs will dictate the types and frequency of routing maintenance
performed. Additional maintenance and repairs will also be performed as the need may be
indicated through calibrations and other equipment checks. Any malfunctions will be corrected
before vehicle testing will continue. Prior to use, all necessary calibrations will be performed.
47
-------
2.4.3.3 RSD Evaluation (Section 5.3.3.3)
New RSD data can play an important role in verifying that cohort vehicles are tested on
the chassis dynamometer in a fully conditioned state and to verify that the vehicle Cohort is
indeed representative of the Kansas City fleet at large. It is ERG's opinion that the most
important use of RSD in this project will be to compare the Cohort to the Kansas City fleet,
especially since many Cohort vehicles will have their emissions tested using a PEMS/PAMS
system. (The data from the PEMS/PAMS system can be more readily compared to the chassis
dynamometer data than RSD data can. From our research in Arizona we know that knowledge
of the last few seconds of how the vehicle was driven is extremely influential on the emissions
during a given second of operation. Since RSD systems do not record operating history, RSD
data is very difficult to compare to second-by-second dynamometer data.)
It is important that the proper equipment be used to collect RSD data for this project.
Environmental Systems Products (ESP) in Tucson, Arizona has developed an opacity
measurement process that uses a range of ultraviolet (UV) light to detect exhaust opacity.
Because UV radiation has a shorter wavelength than either visible or infrared (IR) light, it is
"blocked" and "scattered" by smoke particles that are too small to effect either visible or infrared
light. This allows the ESP system to detect opacity that cannot be detected by older RSD
equipment (which use only IR light for opacity detection). Therefore, this new system is
appropriate for finding smoking vehicles in the fleet. ERG has a contract in place with ESP to
provide RSD equipment for this study. This capability may also improve our ability to recruit
smoking vehicles for Round 2 testing if we find them to be under-represented during Round 1
testing.
The RSD system will be deployed at several sites near where chassis dynamometer
testing is occurring, to allow easy access for Cohort vehicles soon after they are tested. RSD
data will also be collected at other sites around Kansas City to ensure that the fleet in general is
well represented in the data. From our previous experience with RSD data collection in the
Kansas City area, we are familiar with many promising sites for RSD data collection. We are
also familiar with the processes required for obtaining encroachment permits for RSD data
collection sites. This will allow us to effectively oversee our RSD data provider and to ensure a
representative RSD sample. RSD data will be collected during the last month of both Round 1
and Round 2 testing. This will allow us to request participating Cohort vehicles being tested at
this time to drive past the RSD equipment (note that only participants whose cars are tested
during the last month of each round will have RSD data collected).
48
-------
2.4.3.4 Vehicle Fluid Sampling (Section 5.3.3.4)
Oil and gasoline samples will be collected from test vehicles when collection does not
produce an undue burden on program time and costs. It is anticipated that oil samples will be
collected from nearly all, if not all, test vehicles. Approximately 10 ml of oil will be collected
and stored for later analysis. Oil sample analyses to be perfomed are listed in Table 2-7.
Due to gasoline anti-siphoning and evaporative control devices found on most vehicles,
only limited collection of gasoline samples from test vehicles is anticipated.
Unused oil and gasoline samples will be stored for a period of 2 years to allow for
possible further analysis. At the end of the two-year period, oil and gasoline samples will be
recycled.
49
-------
Table 2-7. Oil Sample Analyses
Test
Sulfur Content
Viscosity, cST 40°C, kinematic
Wear Particles, Total Ferrous Particles
Iron, ppm
Copper, ppm
Tin, ppm
Aluminum, ppm
Boron, ppm
Calcium, ppm
Chloride, ppm
Sulfur, ppm
As, ppm
Cr, ppm
Phosphorous, ppm
Silicon, ppm
Nickel, ppm
Lead, ppm
Magnesium, ppm
Sodium, ppm
Zinc, ppm
Water, % (Karl Fisher)
Glycol
Total Acid Number, mg KOH/g
Chromium, ppm
Method
ASTM D4294-90
ASTM D445
ISO 4405
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
Elemental Analysis
ASTM D4926
Infrared Analysis FT-IR
ASTM D664
Elemental Analysis
2.4.3.5
PEMS/PAMS Data (Section 5.3.3.5)
Portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) and portable activity measurement
systems (PAMS) will be used to collect on-road emissions and driving data on a randomly
selected group of vehicles that have been tested on the chassis dynamometer. The purpose of
collecting these data is to improve EPA's understanding of "real world" vehicle operations and
emissions. The data will also be added to the MSOD database, which EPA will use in the
creation of the MOVES model. The data will be ideal for MOVES since it will be collected on a
carefully selected set of vehicles from a metropolitan area which does not yet require an I/M
program.
50
-------
EPA will supply at least eight PEMS/PAMS devices and train ERG team personnel on
their use. ERG team personnel will install and de-install the equipment on vehicles selected
using a method suggested by our team and approved by EPA. Procedures specified in the
PEMS/PAMS QAPP will be strictly followed during installation, de-installation, data download,
and equipment maintenance. These procedures are described in detail in Appendix A of this
document. Whenever possible the installation and de-installation will occur at the dynamometer
test site.
ERG proposes to further investigate vehicle selection methods in collaboration with EPA.
The strata to be used selecting PEMS/PAMS vehicles do not necessarily need to be the same as
those used to select vehicles for dynamometer tests. Since the PEMS/PAMS equipment collects
driving information, it may be advantageous to consider vehicle characteristics that help dictate
how a vehicle is driven in selecting the strata. For example, vehicles with a low "power-to-
weight ratio" are likely to be driven quite differently than vehicles with a high "power-to-weight
ratio." Yet, that ratio will not likely play a prominent role in selecting vehicles for dynamometer
testing. If, after consultation with EPA it is decided to capture this or other vehicle
characteristics in the sample strata, our team will design a special set of strata for the
PEMS/PAMS vehicles.
Owners of the selected vehicles will be instructed on their agreed duties before their
vehicles have a PEMS/PAMS unit installed. These owners will agree to drive their vehicles in
the manner they normally would (as if the PEMS/PAMS unit were not present on their vehicle).
They will also be required to keep a log of significant events during the testing period (e.g.,
changes in vehicle load, such as passengers entering and leaving the vehicle). PEMS devices will
be typically be installed for a period of 1 to 3 days, with each PEMS device installed on about 20
individual vehicles. Similarly, the PAMS devices will be installed for a period of 1 to 7 days,
with each PAMS device installed on about 10 to 12 vehicles.
After the device has been present on their vehicle for the prescribed time period, the
owner will return to the project data collection location to have the PEMS/PAMS unit removed.
The owner will be interviewed at that time to determine various information about their
experience and events that occurred during their participation (no demographic information will
be solicited during the interview). The questions we propose to ask the drivers are:
• Did you drive any differently than you normally drive while the PEMS/PAMS
device was installed on your vehicle?
51
-------
• Do you feel that having the device on your vehicle caused you to drive any
differently than you normally drive?
• Did the device cause your vehicle to behave any differently than it normally does?
In the occasional instance where a vehicle owner is unable to meet at the testing location,
ERG will arrange to meet the owner at a more convenient location for de-installation.
After de-installation the collected data will be downloaded and quality assured in
accordance with the applicable QAPP. Any necessary equipment maintenance and preparation
for the next installation will also occur at that time.
2.4.3.6 Vehicle Testing Reports (Section 5.3.3.6)
Vehicle data, regulated emission results and visible smoke observation results will be
provided to ERG. This data will be compiled and provided in Lotusl23 format for final
reporting to the EPA Project Officer. This data will be provided in a draft report within two
months following vehicle testing. The draft report will also include a description of data
gathering and testing methods used in the study.
At the conclusion of the project, BKI staff will prepare and transport the transportable
dynamometer and analytical trailer back to EPA in RTF NC. Before transport the dynamometer
system will be inspected and packed for shipment. All components and analytical equipment
will be strapped down and secured for over the road transportation.
2.5 Speciation Tasks (Section 5.4)
In addition to the regulated gas pollutants measured by BKI, DRI will provide continuous
measurements of PM mass using an EPA-supplied Brooker Systems Model RPM-101 Quartz
Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and Thermo-MIE Inc. DataRam 4000 Nephelometer. Black carbon
will be measured continuously with a DRI photoacoustic instrument and integrated samples will
be collected and analyzed by DRI for PM gravimetric mass, elements, elemental and organic
carbon, ions, paniculate and semi-volatile organic compounds (all compounds in Table 12 of the
RFP plus methylated-PAHs and oxy-PAHs, and as an option, nitro-PAHs), volatile organic air
toxics (benzene, toluene, xylenes, ethylbenzene, styrene, 1,3-butadiene, n-hexane, naphthalene,
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein and MTBE. Continuous PM and integrated air
measurements that will be made during the study are summarized in Table 2-8.
The samples will be extracted from the BKI dilution tunnel through a low particulate loss
2.5 um cut point pre-classifier. The sample will be isokinetically partitioned among the
52
-------
continuous instruments and integrated air samples using a suitable sample distribution manifold.
The proposed sampling configuration is summarized in Table 2-9. Separate Teflon and quartz
filters will be collected for each of the three phases of the Unified Driving Cycle (UDC) using a
sequential sampler. All other integrated samples will be collected over all three phases of the
cycle, excluding the 10-minute soak period between phases 2 and 3. The number of samples
collected and analyzed during the pilot study and rounds 1 and 2 of the main study are
summarized in Tables 2-6 and 2-7, respectively. The chemical species that will be identified and
quantified are listed in Tables 2-8 through 2-12.
The planned oil sample analysis does not include detailed organic speciation. Recent
studies have shown that emission rates of high-molecular weight PAHs, which are surrogates for
POM (on EPA's HAP list), are correlated with the concentration of these PAHs in lubrication
oil. If additional funding is available, a few oil samples from high emitters and smokers should
be speciated and compared to their relative abundances in exhaust and compared to the relative
abundance of these high-moecular weight PAHs in new unused motor oil.
2.5.1 Pilot Methods Testing Task (Section 5.4.1)
A pilot test will be conducted in the Kansas City area to determine and finalize testing
methodologies, quality assurance and quality control procedures and data management
procedures. Three vehicles will be tested in triplicate at the Kansas City site. The vehicles will
also be tested at the EPA laboratory in Ann Arbor. DRI will measure continuous PM and black
carbon during the pilot study in Kansas City. Collection and analysis of the integrated samples
are provided as shown on Table 2-10. BKI and DRI will review, document, and change if
necessary, all procedures, methods, and sample analyses to ensure proper handling and emission
measurements for the testing program. BKI and DRI will update the QAPP to represent any
changes in the procedures or methods, resulting from the pilot study.
Because semi-volatile organic compounds are a significant component of emissions from
LDGVs relative to emissions of PM, both continuous and integrated PM measurements will vary
depending upon the partitioning of organic material between the gaseous and particulate phases.
The affect of phase distribution on particulate mass measurements is generally more significant
for gasoline-powered vehicles than for diesel-powered vehicles because the fraction of organic
aerosol to elemental carbon is typically higher for LDGVs, especially for the high emitters.
53
-------
2.5.2 Source Testing Equipment Preparation Task (Section 5.4.2)
DRI will provide and prepare sampling equipment and sampling substrates required to
the collection of samples listed in Table 2-8. Table 2-9 summarizes the proposed sampling
configurations for source characterization measurements. We will pre-test the continuous and
integrated sampling equipment prior to installation at the pilot testing site to ensure proper
operation and familiarity by field personnel. DRI will provide personnel to operate the samplers
and collect and store each sample.
2.5.3 Operating Continuous Measurements of Fine PM Task (Section 5.4.3)
Continuous measurements include the following instruments to be supplied by the EPA:
Brooker Systems Model RPM-101 Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) and Thermo-MIE Inc.
DataRam 4000 Nephelometer. In addition, we will supply a DRI photoacoustic instrument for
determination of black carbon mass concentrations. Additional information on these instruments
is provided in Table 2-18. We will also provide measurements of mass and BC concentrations
collected during dynamic tunnel blank samples collection to evaluate the condition of the
dilution tunnel before conducing tests on the next vehicle. These continuous methods for
measurement of fine particulate mass provide several useful data products as well as immediate
feedback about the nature of the emissions from vehicles or ambient concentrations. With a time
resolution between 0.5 and 5 seconds per update, these methods are ideally suited to identify the
portions of a driving cycle where particulate emissions are greatest and least. Rapid time
response is also useful for the successful deployment of dilution tunnels to provide knowledge of
the state of the tunnel. For example, they are useful in determining if a tunnel has been
adequately flushed between measurements. The elemental carbon mass versus total particulate
mass can be determined from the use of the photoacoustic instrument to measure elemental
carbon and QCM instrument or nephelometer for total particulate emissions. The continuous
data may also be time-averaged and accumulated (in real-time) to provide total elemental carbon
emission and total particulate emission for use in comparison of the data with that obtained from
Thermal Optical Reflectance (TOR) analysis and gravimetric analysis of aerosol accumulation
on Teflon or quartz filters. The accumulated particulate mass as a function of time may also be
useful in determining the length of a run necessary for accumulating adequate particulate mass
for other run-averaged samplers such as those used to differentiate between particle and gas
phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). DRI will provide estimates of cumulative
particulate mass loading for each of the samples collected for subsequent chemical analysis at the
conclusion of each run.
54
-------
The continuous monitors will all sample from a common sampling manifold. They will
provide real time graphical output as an aid for judging the best likely sampling strategy for filter
samplers. The photoacoustic instrument will be equipped with pressure, temperature, and relative
humidity sensors so that the mass concentration can be adjusted to the desired ambient condition
of pressure and temperature. Data from the real-time sensors can also be used to evaluate total
particulate emissions by accumulating it over the sample period, and can be compared with data
from the filter samplers. It is recommended that all personnel agree on a single set of standard
conditions, such as 1 atmosphere of pressure and 273 K temperature, and adjust all data so that
applies to these conditions.
2.5.3.1 Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) (Section 5.4.3.1)
A Quartz Crystal Microbalance is a thin, usually round, slice of crystalline quartz with an
electrode on each side. If the two electrodes are put at different potentials an electric field results
across the QCM, i.e. in the "Y direction". Because of the piezoelectric properties of quartz, such
an electric field in the "y direction" couples to shear motion "around" the z-axis, and vice versa.
The end result is that shear waves in the quartz, in which the mechanical displacement is in the
"x" direction, also called the electric axis, are coupled to voltage between the electrodes. QCMs
are used as sensitive detectors of mass deposited on them. This added mass decreases the
resonant frequency of the QCM. The added mass per unit area on the QCM can be calculated by
measuring the decrease in the resonant frequency of the QCM. Because frequency changes can
be measured to very high precision, QCMs are very sensitive. They can measure amounts of
deposited material with an average thickness of less than a single atomic layer. Hence the
"microbalance" part of their name.
QCMs have been used to make "sniffers" for monitoring air pollution. This is done by
having an array of QCMs, each topped with a different thin film which absorbs a particular set of
chemicals. When these chemicals are present in the environment they are absorbed, increasing
the mass of the QCM and decreasing its resonant frequency. The pattern of which sensor's
frequency decrease gives information about what chemicals are present in the environment.
2.5.3.2 Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (Section 5.4.3.2)
No TEOM instrument will be used during the emissions testing procedures.
2.5.3.3 Nephelometer (Section 5.4.3.3)
Nephelometers measure light scattered by aerosol introduced into their sample chamber.
Nephelometers can be fairly simple and compact instruments with excellent sensitivity and time
55
-------
resolution. However, scattering per unit mass is a strong function of particle size and refractive
index. If particle size distributions and refractive indices in exhaust strongly depend on the
particular engine and operating condition, this may not be an effective way to measure exhaust
particle mass. However, it has been shown that mass scattering efficiencies for both on-road
diesel exhaust and ambient fine particles have values around 3 square meters per gram. Mass
scattering efficiencies for exhaust sampled from a dilution tunnel may be significantly lower. For
this project, Thermo-MIE Data Ram 4000 nephelometer will be used. The MIE data Ram
nephelometer measures simultaneously at two wavelengths for the purpose of reducing the
uncertainty in the mass scattering coefficient.
2.5.3.4 Photoacoustic Instrument (Section 5.4.3.4)
The photoacoustic instrument has been developed at DRI and has been described in
several publications (Arnott, Moosmiiller et al. 1999; Arnott, Moosmiiller et al. 2000). Briefly,
light from a 1047 nm laser is power-modulated at the operating frequency of an acoustical
resonator. Sample air is continuously drawn through the resonator at a flow rate of 1 - 3 1pm.
Light absorbing aerosol (black carbon) will absorb some of the laser power, slightly heating the
aerosol (typically much less than 1 C). The heat transfers very rapidly from the aerosol to the
surrounding air, and the local pressure increases, contributing to the standing acoustic wave in
the resonator. The acoustic wave is measured with a microphone as a measure of the light
absorption. For the operating conditions of the resonator, and the laser wavelength used, the
light absorption measurement is linearly proportional to the mass concentration of the black
carbon aerosol in the sample air. The constant of proportionality has been inferred from
correlations of black carbon measurements with elemental carbon as determined by the TOR
method, and an efficiency factor of 5 square meters per gram is used to go from aerosol light
absorption to estimated black carbon mass concentration. No filters are needed for the
photoacoustic measurement, and the flow rate is not used in the calculation of aerosol mass
concentration. The flow rate must only be sufficient to adequately sample the air with minimal
particle loss in the instrument and sample lines. The resolution of the instrument for a 3 second
averaging time is usually 2.5 inverse Mm for light absorption, corresponding to 0.5 microgram
per cubic meter for black carbon mass concentration. The resolution scales as the square root of
sampling time, so for example, a resolution of 0.25 micrograms per cubic meter can be obtained
for a 9 second averaging time. The photoacoustic measurement does not receive interference
from exhaust gases, in our experience so far, and it is a zero-based measurement when no light
absorbing aerosols are present.
56
-------
2.5.4 Integrated Sample Collection and Sample Analyses Task (Section 5.4.4)
DRI will provide and prepare sampling equipment and sampling substrates required for
the collection of the samples listed in Table 2-10. The vehicles will be tested on the EPA
transportable dynamometer using a Unified Driving Cycle that will be composed of three phases.
Separate samples will be collected for each phase of each vehicle for gravimetric mass and
OC/EC. DRI will provide a sequential filter sampler with a PM2 5 inlet in which two filters
(Telfon and quartz) sample concurrently at up to 55 1pm each. The sequential filter sampler has
sufficient number of ports to allow for collection of at least three pairs of filter samples without
the need for filter changes during the three phases of the Unified Driving Cycle. DRI will also
provide a parallel sequential sampler for collection of samples on Teflon-impregnated glass fiber
(TIGF) filters with a backup cartridge consisting of XAD-4 resin. DRI will provide personnel to
operate the samplers.
DRI will acceptance test the Teflon and quartz filters and pre-weigh Teflon filters. Pre-
labeled filter packs will be prepare and shipped to the test site. DRI will also acceptance test
TIGF filters and XAD-4 resin packs and prepare and ship TIGF filters and XAD plug-in
cartridges to the test site. DRI will post-weigh all Teflon filters for PM2.5 mass. DRI will perform
chemical analysis as follows: Teflon filters by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
for elements Na to U; quartz filters by ion chromatography for chloride, nitrate and sulfate ion,
quartz filters for elemental and organic carbon by thermal optical reflectance carbon analysis
(TOR) using the IMPROVE protocol; TIGF/XAD samples for PAHs, methylated-PAHs, oxy-
PAHs, nitro-PAHs (optional), hopanes, steranes, organic acids, cycloalkanes and alkanes (as
listed in Table 2-12, 2-14, 2-15 and 2-16) by GC/MS. Each sample collected for mass and
EC/OC will be analyzed separately. Whether samples are composited for analysis of other
analytes will be decided in consultation with ERG and the EPA project manager after reviewing
the continuous mass and black carbon data.
The following substrates are proposed for this program:
• Gelman (Ann Arbor, MI) polymethylpentane ringed, 2.0 mm pore size, 47 mm
diameter PTFE Teflon-membrane filters (#RPJ047) for particle mass, elements,
and particulate organic acids
• Pallflex (Putnam, CT) 47 mm diameter pre-fired quartz-fiber filters (#2500 QAT-
UP) for water soluble chloride, nitrate, sulfate, ammonium, and potassium
measurements, and for organic and elemental carbon measurements
57
-------
• Pallflex (Putnam, CT) TX40HI20-WW 102 mm diameter teflon-impregnated
glass fiber filters for the DRI Sequential Fine Particulate/Semi -Volatile Organic
Compounds Sampler (PSVOC sampler)
• Polystyrene-divinylbenzene resins, XAD-4 in a cartridges for collection of semi-
volatile PAH. The Amberliete XAD-4 resin (20-60 mesh) is purchased from
Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.
Filters require treatment and representative chemical analyses before they can be used.
Excessive blank levels and filter interferences discovered during or after several important air
quality studies have compromised their results. At least two filters from each lot (typically 100
filters) received from the manufacturers will be analyzed for species to verify that pre-
established specifications have been met. Lots will be rejected if they do not pass this
acceptance test. Each filter will be individually examined over a light table prior to use for
discoloration, pinholes, creases, or other defects. In addition to laboratory blanks, 5 to 10% of
all filters will be designated as field blanks to follow handling procedures, except for actual
sampling.
In addition to acceptance testing, some filters will require pre-treatment before sampling.
Quartz-fiber filters may absorb organic vapors with time. Blank quartz-fiber filters will be
heated in air for at least three hours at -900 °C prior to acceptance testing analysis. Sets of
filters with levels exceeding 1.5 mg/cm2 for organic carbon and 0.5 mg/cm2 for elemental
carbon will be re-fired or rejected. Pre-fired filters will be sealed and stored in a freezer prior to
preparation for field sampling. XAD-4 is placed in a Buchner funnel and rinsed with distilled
water three times followed by technical grade methanol 3-4 times, and again three times with
distilled water. It is then further cleaned by Soxhlet extraction for 48 hours with methanol,
followed by Dionex accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) for 15min/cell with -170 mL of
dichloromethane (CH2C12) and acetone at 1500 psi and 100°C. (The Dionex ASE unit provides
automated sequential solvent extractions with temperature and pressure controls. ASE will be
used in place of sequential Soxhlet extraction, which requires more solvent and more time.) The
XAD-4 is then dried in a vacuum oven at -15 to -20 in Hg and 50 °C. Cleaned XAD-4 is
transferred to clean 1L glass jars and stored in aluminum cans with activated charcoal. The
TIGF filters will be cleaned by sonification in CH2C12 for 30 minutes, followed by another 30-
minute sonification in methanol. Then they will be dried, placed in aluminum foil, and labeled.
Each batch of precleaned XAD-4 resin and -10% of precleaned TIGF filters are checked for
blank levels. Batches with more than 10 |j,g of naphthalene are recleaned and rechecked. The
XAD-4 resins will be assembled into glass cartridges (50 g of XAD between two screens),
wrapped in aluminum foil and stored in a clean freezer prior shipment to the field.
58
-------
At times, batches of Gelman ringed Teflon-membrane filters have yielded variable (by up
to 100 |j,g per 47 mm filter over a few days) blank masses. As the time between manufacture and
use increases, this variability decreases. Since Gelman has minimized its long-term inventory of
these filters, and is manufacturing them on an as-ordered basis, this variability has been observed
with greater frequency, though it is not widely reported. A one-month storage period in a
controlled environment, followed by one week of equilibration in the weighing environment,
appear to have reduced the variability to acceptable (within ±15 |j,g per filter for re-weights of 47
mm and 37 mm diameter filters) levels. DRI has enough stock of these preconditioned filters to
easily accommodate this study. The results of the laboratory filter treatments, chemical analyses,
and visual inspections are recorded in a database with the lot numbers. A set of filter IDs is
assigned to each lot so that a record of acceptance testing can be associated with each sample.
2.5.5 Integrated Sample Analyses Task (Section 5.4.5)
A summary of information on the PM instruments described below is provided in Table
2-19.
2.5.5.1 PM2.5 Mass Gravimetric Analysis (Section 5.4.5.1)
Unexposed and exposed Teflon-membrane filters are equilibrated at a temperature of 20
±5 °C and a relative humidity of 30±5% for a minimum of 24 hours prior to weighing.
Weighing is performed on a Cahn 31 electro microbalance with ±0.0001 mg sensitivity. The
charge on each filter is neutralized by exposure to a polonium source for 30 seconds prior to the
filter being placed on the balance pan. The balance is calibrated with a 20 mg Class M weight
and the tare is set prior to weighing each batch of filters. After every 10 filters are weighed, the
calibration and tare are re-checked. If the results of these performance tests deviate from
specifications by more than ±5 |j,g, the balance is re-calibrated. If the difference exceeds ±15 |j,g,
the balance is recalibrated and the previous 10 samples are re-weighed. Per DRI's Standard
Operating Procedure, at least 30% of the weights are checked by a second technician and
samples are re-weighed if these check-weights do not agree with the original weights within
±0.015 mg. Pre- and post-weights, check weights, and re-weights (if required) are recorded on
data sheets as well as being directly entered into a data base via an RS232 connection. All
PM2.5 and PM10 Teflon filters will be analyzed for mass. All weights are entered by filter
number into the DRI aerosol data base.
59
-------
2.5.5.2 Elements (Section 5.4.5.2)
Teflon-membrane filters will be analyzed with a Thermo Elemental X7 Inductively
Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer with Collision Cell and Xi interface for the following
elements: Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, As, Se, Br, Rb, Sr, Y,
Zr, Mo, Pd, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, Ba, La, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb, and U.
Table 2-13 compares the elements that are quantified by XRF and ICP-MS and the
associated minimum detection limits. Neither method will provide data for all specified
elements. We recommend a combination of XRF using DRI protocol A and ICP-MS for selected
elements (definitely Pb and Hg and possibly As, Zn, Ni, Mn and Cr). Note that Boron will not be
analyzed, as it cannot investigated using XRF or ICP-MS.
A quality control standard and a replicate from a previous batch are analyzed with each
set of 14 samples. When a quality control value differs from specifications by more than ±5% or
when a replicate concentration differs from the original value (when values exceed 10 times the
detection limits) by more than ±10%, the samples are re-analyzed. If further tests of standards
show that the system calibration has changed by more than ±2%, the instrument is re-calibrated
as described above. All ICP-MS results are directly entered into the DRI data bases.
2.5.5.3 EC/OC (Section 5.4.5.3)
The thermal/optical reflectance (TOR) method measures organic (OC) and elemental
(EC) carbon. The TOR method is based on the principle that different types of carbon-
containing particles are converted to gases under different temperature and oxidation conditions.
The different carbon fractions from TOR are useful for comparison with other methods which
are specific to a single definition for organic and elemental carbon. These specific carbon
fractions also help distinguish among seven carbon fractions reported by TOR:
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere at temperatures between ambient and
120°C(OC1)
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere at temperatures between 120 °C and
250 °C (OC2)
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere at temperatures between 250 °C and
450 °C (OC3)
• The carbon evolved in a helium atmosphere between 450 °C and 550 °C (OC4)
• The carbon evolved in an oxidizing atmosphere at 550 °C (EC1)
60
-------
• The carbon evolved in an oxidizing atmosphere between 550 °C and 700 °C
(EC2)
• The carbon evolved in an oxidizing atmosphere between 700 °C and 800 °C
(ECS)
The thermal/optical reflectance carbon analyzer consists of a thermal system and an
optical system. The thermal system consists of a quartz tube placed inside a coiled heater.
Current through the heater is controlled to attain and maintain pre-set temperatures for given
time periods. A portion of a quartz filter is placed in the heating zone and heated to different
temperatures under non-oxidizing and oxidizing atmospheres. The optical system consists of a
He-Ne laser, a fiber optic transmitter and receiver, and a photocell. The filter deposit faces a
quartz light tube so that the intensity of the reflected laser beam can be monitored throughout the
analysis.
As the temperature increases from ambient (-25 °C) to 550 °C, organic compounds are
volatilized from the filter in a non-oxidizing (He) atmosphere while elemental carbon is not
oxidized. When oxygen is added to the helium at temperatures greater than 550 °C, the elemental
carbon burns and enters the sample stream. The evolved gases pass through an oxidizing bed of
heated manganese dioxide where they are oxidized to carbon dioxide, then across a heated nickel
catalyst which reduces the carbon dioxide to methane (CH4). The methane is then quantified
with a flame ionization detector (FID).
The reflected laser light is continuously monitored throughout the analysis cycle. The
negative change in reflectance is proportional to the degree of pyrolytic conversion from organic
to elemental carbon which takes place during organic carbon analysis. After oxygen is
introduced, the reflectance increases rapidly as the light-absorbing carbon is burned off the filter.
The carbon measured after the reflectance attains the value it had at the beginning of the analysis
cycle is classified as elemental carbon. This adjustment for pyrolysis in the analysis is
significant, as high as 25% of organic or elemental carbon, and it cannot be ignored.
The system is calibrated by analyzing samples of known amounts of methane, carbon
dioxide, and potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP). The FID response is ratioed to a reference
level of methane injected at the end of each sample analysis. Performance tests of the instrument
calibration are conducted at the beginning and end of each day's operation. Intervening samples
are re-analyzed when calibration changes of more than ±10% are found.
Known amounts of American Chemical Society (ACS) certified reagent grade crystal
sucrose and KHP are committed to TOR as a verification of the organic carbon fractions. Fifteen
61
-------
different standards are used for each calibration. Widely accepted primary standards for
elemental and/or organic carbon are still lacking. Results of the TOR analysis of each filter are
entered into the DRI data base.
2.5.5.4 Ion Chromatographic Analysis for Chloride, Nitrate, and
Sulfate (Section 5.4.5.4)
Water-soluble chloride, nitrate, sulfate, ammonium, sodium, and potassium are obtained
by extracting the quartz-fiber particle filter in 15 ml of deionized-distilled water (DDW). The
extraction vials are capped and sonicated for 60 minutes, shaken for 60 minutes, then aged
overnight to assure complete extraction of the deposited material in the solvent. The ultrasonic
bath water is monitored to prevent temperature increases from the dissipation of ultrasonic
energy in the water. After extraction, these solutions are stored under refrigeration prior to
analysis.
Water-soluble chloride (Cl"), nitrate (NO3"), and sulfate (SO/f) are measured with the
Dionex 2020i (Sunnyvale, CA) ion chromatograph (1C). In 1C, an ion-exchange column
separates the sample ions in time for individual quantification by a conductivity detector. Prior
to detection, the column effluent enters a suppressor column where the chemical composition of
the component is altered, resulting in a matrix of low conductivity. The ions are identified by
their elution/retention times and are quantified by the conductivity peak area. Approximately 2
ml of the filter extract are injected into the ion chromatograph. The resulting peaks are
integrated and the peak integrals are converted to concentrations using calibration curves derived
from solution standards. The Dionex system for the analysis of Cl", NO3", and SO/f contains a
guard column (AG4a column, Cat. No. #37042) and an anion separator column (AS4a column,
Cat. No. #37041) with a strong basic anion exchange resin, and an anion micro membrane
suppressor column (250 ' 6 mm ID) with a strong acid ion exchange resin. The anion eluent
consists of sodium carbonate (TS^COs) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCOs) prepared in DDW.
The DDW is verified to have a conductivity of less than 1.8 ' 10-5 ohm/cm prior to preparation
of the eluent. For quantitative determinations, the ion chromatograph is operated at a flow rate
of2.0ml/min.
The primary standard solution containing NaCl, NaNOs, and (Na)2SO4 are prepared with
reagent grade salts which were dried in an oven at 105 °C for one hour and then brought to room
temperature in a desiccator. These anhydrous salts are weighed to the nearest 0.10 mg on a
routinely calibrated analytical balance under controlled temperature (-20 °C) and relative
humidity (±30%) conditions. These salts are diluted in precise volumes of DDW. Calibration
standards are prepared at least once within each month by diluting the primary standard solution
62
-------
to concentrations covering the range of concentrations expected in the filter extracts and stored in
a refrigerator. The calibration concentrations prepared are at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/ml for
each of the analysis species.
Calibrations curves are performed weekly. Chemical compounds are identified by
matching the retention time of each peak in the unknown sample with the retention times of
peaks in the chromatograms of the standards.
A DDW blank is analyzed after every 20 samples and a calibration standard is analyzed
after every 10 samples. These quality control checks verify the baseline and calibration,
respectively. Environmental Research Associates (ERA, Arvada, CO) standards are used daily
as an independent quality assurance (QA) check. These standards (ERA Wastewater Nutrient
and ERA Mineral WW) are traceable to NIST simulated rainwater standards. If the values
obtained for these standards do not coincide within a pre-specified uncertainty level (typically
three standard deviations of the baseline level or ±5%), the samples between that standard and
the previous calibration standards are re-analyzed.
After analysis, the printout for each sample in the batch is reviewed for the following: 1)
proper operational settings, 2) correct peak shapes and integration windows, 3) peak overlaps, 4)
correct background subtraction, and 5) quality control sample comparisons. When values for
replicates differ by more than ±10% or values for standards differ by more than ±5%, samples
before and after these quality control checks are designated for re-analysis in a subsequent batch.
Individual samples with unusual peak shapes, background subtractions, or deviations from
standard operating parameters are also designated for re-analysis.
2.5.5.5 Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (Section 5.4.5.5)
Prior to extraction, the following deuterated internal standards are added to each filter-
sorbent pair: naphthalene-d8, acenaphthylene-d8, phenanthrene-dlO, anthracene-dlO, chrysene-
d!2, fluoranthene-dlO, pyrene-dlO, benz[a]anthracene-d!2, benzo[e]pyrene-d!2,
benzo[a]pyrene-d!2, benzo[k]fluoranthene-d-12 , coronene-d-12, and benzo[g,h,i]perylene-d!2,
high molecular weight aliphatic hydrocarbons ranging from dodecane-d26 to octacosane-d58,
cholestane-d4; and polar organics ranging from benzoic-d3 acid to cholesterol-d6. The filter-
XAD pairs will be extracted by Dionex ASE with dichloromethane followed by acetone to
expand the polarity range of analytes; these extraction solvents have been reported to yield high
recovery of PAH (Chuang et al., 1987) and other compounds of interest (Hawthorne et al., 1988,
1989).
63
-------
The extracts are then combined and concentrated by rotary evaporation at 20 °C under
gentle vacuum to ~1 mL and filtered through 0.45 mm Acrodiscs (Gelman Scientific), with the
sample flask rinsed twice with 1 mL CH2C12 each time. Approximately 100 jiL of acetonitrile is
added to the sample and CH2C12 was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The final
sample volume is adjusted to 1 mL with acetonitrile. This procedure has been tested by
Atkinson et al. (1988). The detailed procedure is described in DRI standard operating
procedures.
The extracts are then split into two fractions. The first fraction is analyzed without further
alteration for PAH, alkanes, hopanes, and steranes by a GC/MS using an electron impact select
ion storage (SIS) method. The second fraction is derivatized using a mixture of
bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA), trimethylsilylcholorosilane (TMCS), and
silylation grade pyridine to convert the polar compounds into their trimethylsilyl derivatives for
analysis of organic acids, cholesterol, sitosterol, and levoglucosan. Samples are then analyzed
by GC/MS using isobutane chemical ionization SIS method.
For hopanes and steranes, the samples are precleaned prior to GC/MS analysis using a
solid phase extraction (SPE) technique described by Wang et al. (1994a,b). Clean up is
conducted on a 6ml Supelco SPE cartridge packed with 0.5g of SiOH. Samples are spiked on to
a SPE cartridge along with ten microliters of n_tetrocosane-d50 (internal standard) and the PAH
internal standard described above. Elution and fractionation is conducted with 1ml of hexane
followed by 1.25 ml of benzene/hexane (1:1). Hopanes and steranes are eluted along with
n_tetrocosane-d50 in the hexane fraction, while the PAH are eluted in the hexane/benzene with
the PAH internal standards.
The samples are analyzed either by the El (electron impact) or isobutane chemical
ionization (polar compounds) GC/MS technique. A Varian Star 3800CX GC equipped with an
8200CX Automatic Sampler and interfaced to a Varian Saturn 2000 Ion Trap was used for these
analyses. Injections (1 jiL) were made in the splitless mode onto a 30 m 5%
phenylmethylsilicone fused-silica capillary column (DB-5ms, J&W Scientific). Quantification
of the individual compounds is obtained by selective ion storage (SIS) technique, monitoring the
molecular ion (or the characteristic ion) of each compound of interest and the corresponding
deuterated internal standard, added prior to extraction. Calibration curves for the GC/MS
quantification are made for the most abundant and characteristic ion peaks of the hopanes,
steranes, PAH and other organic compounds of interest using the deuterated species most closely
matched in volatility and retention characteristics as internal standards. Authentic PAH
standards (purchased from Aldrich, Inc.) plus National Institute of Standards and Technology
64
-------
(NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1647 (certified PAH) with the addition of deuterated
internal standards and of those compounds not present in the SRM (i.e., methoxylated phenols,
hopanes, steranes, lactones, cholesterol) are used to make calibration solutions. For quantifying
hopanes and steranes the following authentic standards are used: C27 20R-5a,14a,17a-cholestane
(purchased from Aldrich), 17b(H),21b (H)-hopane, 17a(H),21b(H)-30-norhopane, and
17a(H),21b(H)-hopane (purchased from Chiron AS, Norway). The remaining hopane and
steranes are identified based on their mass spectra and retention time comparison with data
available in the literature (Wang and Fingas, 1995; Rogge et al., 1993). For quantification of the
hopanes and steranes for which authentic standards are not available, the response factor of
standards most closely matched in volatility and retention characteristics are used. A three-level
calibration is performed for each compound of interest and the calibration check (using median
calibration standards) is run every ten samples to check for accuracy of analyses. If the relative
accuracy of measurement (defined as a percentage difference from the standard value) is less
than 30%, the instrument is recalibrated.
Recently, the Organic Analytical Laboratory (OAL) has received Varian 1200 triple
quadrupole gas chromatograph - mass spectrometer (GC/MS/MS) system. The tandem MS/MS
system allows for structural elucidation of unknown compounds with precursor, product and
neutral loss scan. The GC interface allows for sensitive analyses of complex mixtures in electron
impact (El) as well as positive and negative chemical ionization (CI) mode. Negative CI offers a
superior sensitivity for the analysis of nitro-PAH (mutagens and/or suspected carcinogens) that
could be emitted from combustion sources, including motor vehicle engines. The sensitivity of
this instrument in full scan EI/MS mode is approximately 1 pg/ul with 20:1 signal-to-noise ratio
(S/N). In EI/MS SIM mode it reaches 50 fg/ul with 10:1 S/N. For negative CI, 10 fg/ul of
octafluoronaphthalene gives S/N of 20:1. This superior sensitivity offers the advantage of
analyzing small samples collected during a short sampling time.
Table 2-14 presents the list of hydrocarbons and carbonyls to be analyzed for the study.
Table 2-15 shows the list of PAH, including methylated PAH and oxy-PAH and nitro-PAH
analyzed by the DRI OAL. Table 2-16 shows the list of hopanes, steranes, alkanes, and
cycloalkenes that are usually analyzed by the OAL and Table 2-17 list organic acids and other
polar organic compounds.
2.5.5.6 Gaseous Air Toxics (Section 5.4.5.6)
Gaseous air toxic include canister sampling for VOC (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, m-
, p-,o-xylene, ie.BTEX, styrene, n-hexane, naphthalene, 1,3-butadiene, MTBE), andDNPH-
65
-------
coated Sep Pak cartridges sampling for carbonyl compounds (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde,
acroleine). The DRI Organic Analytical Laboratory (OAL) routinely uses these methods and
DRI standard operating procedures (SOPs) for sampling and analysis are available upon request.
Canister samples
The canister sampling procedure will essentially follow the pressurized sampling method
described by EPA Methods TO-12 and TO-14 and the EPA document "Technical Assistance
Document for Sampling and Analysis of Ozone Precursors" (October 1991, EPA/600-8-91/215).
A stainless steel Viton pump draws in ambient air from the sampling manifold to fill and
pressurize the sample canisters. A flow control device maintains a constant flow into the
canisters over the desired sample period. This flow rate is preset to fill the canisters to about 1
atm above ambient pressure at the end of the sampling period (as described by EPA Method TO-
14). For automatic operation, the timer starts and stops the pump at the appropriate time. The
timer also opens the solenoid valve when the pump starts and closes it when the pump stops.
The use of the solenoid manifold valves permits the automatic selection of preloaded canisters.
The canister sampling systems were custom-built at the DRI. They are multiple-event
sampling systems, allowing unattended collection of three or six (plus one collocated) canister
samples. The detailed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for canister samplers will be
included in QA/QC plan.
For motor vehicle exhaust sampling, NO2 is of concern, since it may react with 1,3
butadiene. NREL has indicated that they will consider funding a laboratory evaluation of a cobalt
oxide denuder that removes both NO and NO2. This evaluation will be done prior to Round 1
and will also include an evaluation of long-term stability of 1-3 butadiene in canisters. For the
pilot study, we will use a denuder to remove NO and NO2 and examine correlations of 1,3-
butadiene with ethylene and propylene from the Gas/Diesel Split Study. Figure 2-9 shows that
1,3-butadiene is well correlated with ethene and propene, which are more stable combustion
product. These samples were analyzed on-site with a GC-MS within a few minutes of sample
collection. The loss of 1,3-butadiene in the Kansas City samples could be corrected using the
correlations established in the Gas/Diesel PM Split Study. Whether these correlations are fuel
specific is not known. However, we believe that these correlations may be more widely
applicable since they involve compounds that are combustion products rather than from
unburned fuel. As an option, we propose to deploy the same GC/MS that was used in the
previous study for the first month of this study to establish both the stability of 1,3-butadiene and
correlations with ethene and propene.
66
-------
After sampling, an identification tag will be attached to each canister and the canister
serial number, sample number, and sampling location, date, and time will be recorded on this tag.
In addition a field sampling form and chain-of-custody form will be filled out giving all pertinent
information on the collection of the sample.
Prior to sampling, the canisters are cleaned by repeated evacuation and pressurization
with humidified zero air, as described in the EPA document "Technical Assistance Document for
Sampling and Analysis of Ozone Precursors" (October 1991, EPA/600-8-91/215). Six repeatable
cycles of evacuation to -0.5 mm Hg absolute pressure, followed by pressurization with ultra-
high-purity (UHP) humid zero air to -20 psig are used. The differences between the DRI
procedure and the EPA recommended method are that, in the DRI method, canisters are heated
to 140°C during the vacuum cycle and more cycles of pressure and vacuum are used. According
to our experience and that of others (Rasmussen, 1992), heating is essential to achieve the
desired canister cleanliness. Also, the canisters are kept longer under vacuum cycles, about one
hour in the DRI method, as opposed to half an hour in the EPA method. At the end of the
cleaning procedure, one canister out of 12 in a lot is filled with humidified UHP zero air and
analyzed by the gas chromatograph/flame ionization detection (GC/FID) method. The canisters
are considered clean if the total non-methane organic compound (NMOC) concentration is less
than 20 ppbC. The actual concentrations of blank-check canisters are typically below 10 ppbC.
Canister samples are analyzed for speciated VOC concentrations promptly upon receipt
of samples from the field, using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method according to
guidance provided by the EPA Method TO-15. The GC/MS system includes: Entech 7100
preconcentrator, Varian 3800 gas chromatograph with FID and column switching valve, and
Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass spectrometer. The Entech preconcentrator consisted of three
traps: 50% glass beads/50% Tenax, held at -100°C during sample transfer, 100% Tenax held at -
40°C and a final focusing trap (a piece of silico-steel capillary) held at -180°C. The sample is
desorbed from the first trap at 10°C, from the second trap at 200°C and from the third one at
approximately 70 °C to a transfer line heated to 110°C and connected to the head of the first
column. The sample is injected at the head of a 60 m x 0.32 mm polymethylsiloxane column
(CPSil-5, Varian, Inc.) held at 30°C. This column is connected to the switching valve leading
into a 30 m x 0.53 mm GS-GasPro column (J&W Scientific). After approximately 7 min the
valve was switched so that the effluent from the first column eluted onto a second 15 m x 0.32
mm polymethylsiloxane column connected to the mass spectrometer. The column switch was
timed so that the C2 and C3 compounds eluted on the FID and all C4 and higher compounds
eluted on the mass spectrometer. The GC program is as follows: 30°C held for 2 min, then
67
-------
8°C/min up to 260°C. Calibration of the system is conducted with a mixture that contained the
most commonly found hydrocarbons (75 compounds from ethane to n-undecane, purchased
from Air Environmental), MTBE, and halocarbons (23 compounds from F12 to the
dichlorobenzenes, purchased from Scott Specialty Gases). The standards are prepared in 6 L
Silco-Steel canisters (Restek, Bellefonte, PA) by mixing three different standards through a
multi-valve manifold using a Baratron absolute capacitance manometer (MKS Instruments,
Andover, MA) to determine the pressure each standard added to the mixture. Prior to mixing,
approximately 0.2 ml of ultrapure water is added to the canister to humidify the mixture (for
mixture stability). The concentrations in the mixture are in the range of 0.2 to 10 ppbv. Three
point external calibrations are run prior to analysis, and one calibration check is run every 24
hours. If the response of individual compounds are more then 10% off, the system is
recalibrated.
For canisters the replicate analysis is conducted at least 24 hours after the initial analysis
to allow re-equilibration of the compounds within the canister. The replicate analyses are
flagged in our database and the programs we have for data processing extract these replicates and
determine a replicate precision. Replicate analysis is important because it provides us with a
continuous check on all aspects of each analysis, and indicates problems with the analysis before
they become significant.
Carbonyl compounds
Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acroleine will be collected with Sep-Pak cartridges that
have been impregnated with an acidified 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) reagent (Waters,
Inc), according to the EPA Method TO-11 A. When the exhaust is drawn through the cartridge,
carbonyls in the sample are captured by reacting with DNPH to form hydrazones, which are
separated and quantified using HPLC in the laboratory (Fung and Grosjean, 1981). After
sampling, the cartridges will be eluted with acetonitrile. An aliquot of the eluent will be
transferred into a 1-ml septum vial and injected with an autosampler into a high performance
liquid chromatograph (Waters Alliance System) for separation and quantitation of the
hydrazones (Fung and Grosjean 1981). Since acroleine undergos isomerization when reacted
with DNPH on the silica-gel cartridges forming two products, both peaks will be identified and
quantified and the total concentration will be reported. Table 2-14 presents a list of hydrocarbons
and carbonyls that will be analyzed.
68
-------
2.5.6 Data Analysis Task
2.5.6.1 Data Validation
Data from the field, laboratory, and various quality control activities must be unified
prior to reporting in a measurement database. Values must be accepted, corrected, flagged as
suspect, or removed from this database after they are evaluated against validation criteria.
Precision estimates associated with each value must be calculated from performance test data.
Sample validation consists of procedures which identify deviations from measurement
assumptions and procedures. Three levels of validation are applied which will result in the
assignment to each measurement of one of the following ratings: 1) valid; 2) valid but suspect;
or 3) invalid.
Level I sample validation takes place in the field or in the laboratory and consists of: 1)
flagging samples when significant deviations from measurement assumptions have occurred; 2)
verifying computer file entries against data sheets; 3) eliminating values for measurements
which are known to be valid because of instrument malfunctions; and 4) adjustment of
measurement values for quantifiable calibration or interference biases. The Level I validated
data are appended to the master database. Each sample appears as a record within the database
and is identified by a unique sample identification, site, date, and time and as a primary,
collocated, blank, spiked, or replicate sample.
Level II validation applies a consistency test based on known physical relationships
between variables to the assembled data. Examples include range checks (both single species
and ratios of species) and examination of scatterplots and time-series plots for outliers. They
also include comparisons of redundant measurements made by the same group by different
methods or by different groups using the same method. Validation approaches will be described
fully in the project QAPP. Examples include the following checks.
• Gravimetric Mass (DRI) versus 1) integration of the continuous QCM and
nephelometer measurements, 2) total and carbon fractions, sum of species (ion,
elements, carbon).
• EC from TOR versus OC minus integrated continuous PM measurements
• OC versus organic species by type (PAH, hopanes, steranes, alkanes, polars) and
phase (VOC, SVOC and PM)
• Comparisons of BKI and DRI gravimetric mass
69
-------
A data validation summary is maintained in the character field associated with each
record to provide a traceability trail for all data adjustments, replacements, or deletions. The data
validation flags and summaries accompany this final database. This database will be submitted
in dBase format (or other format requested by ERG and EPA) on CD. The database will be
accompanied by a quality assurance reports which document results of all quality assurance
activities.
Level III sample validation is part of the subsequent data interpretation process. The
examination of the variability of the exhaust composition profiles with emission rates and phase
(e.g., cold start) will provide further validation and determination of consistency with prior
studies. The first assumption upon finding a measurement which is inconsistent with physical
expectations is that the unusual value is due to a measurement error.
2.5.6.2 Variability of Emission Rates of Volatile Air Toxics
Gasoline-powered vehicles emit a substantial portion of ozone-forming volatile organic
compounds in the urban areas of the country and contribute to exposures to volatile air toxics
such as BTEX, 1,2-butadiene and aldehydes. In this task, we will derive emission rates for
individual toxic compounds and characterize the variability in the emission rates for each run
with corresponding speciation data.
2.5.6.3 Development and Evaluation of Composition Profiles
Organic carbon and elemental carbon are the most abundant species in motor vehicle
exhaust, accounting for over 95% of the total mass. The abundances of organic and total carbon
can be quite variable in motor vehicle exhaust profiles. Elemental carbon is relatively more
abundant in diesel exhaust than in gasoline exhaust, but is less from newer technology diesel
engines. The relative abundance EC is less at lower engine load. We have found that gasoline
vehicles emit relatively higher amounts of elemental carbon during cold starts and during high
accelerations. Gasoline exhaust measured during the NRFAS (Watson et al, 1998) had an
average split of 75% organic carbon and 25% elemental carbon with higher relative EC during
cold starts (based on TOR/IMPROVE carbon measurements). Because of the variability of
OC/EC splits, gasoline and diesel vehicles cannot be apportioned by carbon analysis alone, and
EC is not a unique tracer for diesel exhaust.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are present in emissions from all combustion
sources and the relative proportions of different PAH compounds in emissions from a given
source may vary over several orders of magnitude. PAH exhibit a wide range of volatility with
70
-------
naphthalene existing almost entirely in the gas phase, while BaP, other five-ring PAH, and
higher ring PAH are predominantly adsorbed on particles. The intermediate three- and four-ring
PAH (semi-volatile PAH) are distributed between the two phases.
Data from NFRAQS and the NREL Comparative Toxicity Study (Zielinska et al. 2001)
show that gasoline vehicles emit certain PAHs in greater relative abundance to other PAHs than
do diesel vehicles. Gasoline vehicle, whether low or high emitter, emit greater amounts of high
molecular-weight particulate PAHs (e.g., benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene, ideno(l,2,3-
cd)pyrene, and coronene). These PAHs are found in used gasoline motor oil (but not in fresh oil
and not in diesel engine oil). The oil acting as a scrubber to remove combustion-produced PAH
may explain this. Diesel vehicles also emit particulate PAHs, but in lower relative proportions to
other PAHs, especially the semi-volatile methylated PAHs. Diesel emissions contained higher
proportions of dimethylnaphthalenes, methyl- and dimethylphenanthrenes, and methylfluorenes.
These compounds are distributed between the gas and particle phase and thus require back-up
traps to be quantitatively collected. Particulate methylated PAH are also more abundant in diesel
than spark-ignition engine emissions. Emission rates of hopanes and steranes are the highest for
both gasoline and diesel "high emitting" vehicles. Hopanes and steranes are present in
lubricating oil with similar composition for both gasoline and diesel vehicles and are not present
in gasoline or diesel fuels. While hopanes and steranes are useful markers for motor vehicle
emission, they cannot be used to distinguish gasoline and diesel exhaust.
The source profiles will be weight fraction of gravimetric mass with one sigma analytical
errors for individual measurements. The uncertainties in the composite profiles are the larger of
either the one-sigma variations in fractional species abundance among members of the composite
or the root mean square of the individual analytical uncertainties. Because dynamometer
samples are typically collected at higher temperatures and shorter time periods than ambient
samples, they tend to contain higher fractions of semi-volatile organic compounds. Most of the
volatile compounds are contained in the OC1 fraction in the TOR measurements. To minimize
the impact of the differences in phase distributions between source and ambient samples on the
source apportionment calculations, we will also examine alternative parameters for
normalization of species to weight fraction such as TC minus OC1.
2.5.7 Analysis of Continuous PM and EC Data Task
Analysis of continuous PM and EC data. The continuous particulate measurements from
both the ambient and source measurements will be made available promptly for the relevant
personnel attached to the project. The data will be provided in individual files pertaining to a
71
-------
given day of measurement in the case of ambient sampling, or to a particular vehicle in the case
of source sampling. The data will be calibrated to an agreed upon standard of pressure and
temperature. In the case of source sampling, the data will be processed and interpolated as
appropriate to provide a real time assessment of the elemental carbon and total carbon content.
The data will also be time averaged and accumulated over the entire sampling period and will be
compared with filter-based measurements.
1. Instrument comparison for particulate emissions. From dynamometer tests; PM
mass versus elemental carbon (EC) / total carbon (TC) by photoacoustic versus
EC/TC by Thermal Optical Reflectance (TOR) and Thermal Optical
Transmittance (TOT). Compare ambient EC by photoacoustic with EC by TOR
and TOT.
2. Analysis of PM mass, organic carbon (OC) / TC, and EC/TC by mode (phase,
speed, and acceleration) and vehicle emitter type.
2.5.8 Maintenance of Emission Equipment Task (Section 5.4.8)
An important part of our QA and QC program is equipment maintenance. Maintenance
improves reliability and precision of the equipment. Also, maintenance recommended by the
manufacturer is usually a mandatory part of warranty coverage.
The ERG team has a history of providing high quality data. This could not be achieved
without a robust equipment maintenance program that is designed in the context of a QMP. For
this project we will continue our practice of integrating all required maintenance into the QAPP
for each measurement equipment system. This will include at least; the remote sensing
equipment, the PEMS/PAMS equipment, the portable dynamometer system and its analytical
systems, and the data collection and laboratory equipment owned and operated by DRI.
ERG, BKI and DRI will provide for the maintenance, calibration, and operation of all
project testing equipment, including the transportable dynamometer, regulated emissions
analytical system, PM sampling equipment, PEMS/PAMS, RSDs, and other project equipment.
Manufacturer's recommendations and good engineering practice will dictate types and frequency
of routine maintenance performed. Additional maintenance and repairs will also be performed as
the need may be indicated through calibrations and other equipment checks. Any equipment
malfunctions will be corrected before vehicle testing is allowed to continue. Prior to use in the
study, all necessary calibrations will be performed, including flow rates, temperatures, linearity,
etc.
72
-------
Any modifications to equipment will be approved in advance in writing from the Project
Officer.
2.5.9 Health, Safety, and Environmental Practices Task (Section 5.4.9)
BKI understands the Government's concern that contractors, subcontractors, and other
personnel who support EPA's research efforts have a history of concern for the welfare and
safety of its employees and for the safety of government personnel in the work area. Our
proposed program will ensure that our field operations are in full compliance with all applicable
policies, rules, and regulations. To ensure our compliance with federal, state, and local
regulations, policies, and procedures, the BKI Program Manager will assist by establishing,
interpreting, and enforcing safety policies, rules, and regulations; conducting inspections,
investigating accidents, and making recommendations; recommending and providing safety
training; and reviewing safety protocols for hazardous operations.
The minimum personal protective equipment required in the field and laboratory where
chemicals are handles are safety glasses, laboratory coats, and gloves. Depending upon the
chemicals in use and the testing and procedures being performed, additional protective
equipment may be required. These include goggles or a face shield when there is a chance for
chemical splash, rotating machinery, or flying particles; hearing protection in high noise areas;
safety shoes or for handling heavy equipment or gas cylinders; or respirators where hazard
control equipment may not lower exposure levels to an acceptable limit or failure of this
equipment during chemical handling would pose a threat that was immediately dangerous to life
and health.
BKI provides all personal protective equipment and the necessary training for its use for
employees. Employees have the responsibility to use the equipment as appropriate and to be
sure it is in good working condition or is replaced.
ERG, BKI and DRI are committed to a safe working environment and will adhere to
applicable health and safety practices and requirements.
73
-------
Table 2-8. Summary of measurements and sample collection for the Kansas City LDGV Characterization Study
Train ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7a
7ab
8
9
10
11
Sample
HC
CO/CO2
NOx
QCM
Nephelometer
Photoacoustic
Teflon Membrane
Quartz Filter backup
behind Teflon filter
Quartz Filter
TIGF/XAD
canisters with NO2
denuder
DNPH cartridges
Intended Analysis
Total volatile hydrocarbons
CO, CO2
NO, NOx
PM2.5 mass
PM2.5 mass
Black Carbon
gravimetric mass (each UDC phase),
elements by ICP-MS (UDC composite)
EC/OC by TOR (each UCD phase)
EC/OC by TOR (each UCD phase), ions
by 1C (UDC composite)
PM and semi-volatile organic compounds
by GC-MS (UCD composite)
VOC speciation by GC-FID (UDC
composite)
carbonyl compounds by HPLC-UV (UDC
composite)
Number of
Samples/cycle
continuous
continuous
continuous
continuous
continuous
continuous
3
3
3
1
1
1
Time Resolution
1 sec.
1 sec.
1sec.
1-5 sec.
1-5 sec.
1-5 sec.
310, 1116, 310
sec.
310, 1116,310
sec.
310, 1116, 310
sec.
1736 sec.
1736 sec.
1736 sec.
Equipment
Supplier3
BKI
BKI
BKI
EPA/SWRi
EPA
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
Equipment
Operator a
BKI
BKI
BKI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
DRI
a. Bevilacqua-Knight, Inc. (BKI), Desert Research Institute (DRI), Southwest Research Institute (SWRi)
b. Proposed (optional cost provided in latest budget)
-------
Table 2-9. Base sampling configuration for the Kansas City LDGV Characterization Study
Source
BKI
Dynamometer CVS
Sampling System
(450 Ipm)
Primary
Inlet/connection
Side A
Size Cut
PM2.5
cyclone
PM2.5
cyclone
None
Primary inlet flow
(Ipm)
113
113
1.3
Channel ID
7a
8
9
10
11
Secondary Inlet
Flow (Ipm)
50
50
10
113
0.3
1
Filter media/ instrument
Teflon 1 (47mm) a
Teflon 2 (47mm) a
Teflon 3 (47mm) a
Teflon 4 (47mm) a
Quartz 1 (47 mm)
Quartz 2 (47 mm)
Quartz 3 (47 mm)
Quartz 4 (47 mm)
none
TIGF/XAD
none
VOC canisters
DNPH
UCD
Phase
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
blank
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
blank
Phases 1 ,2,3
Phases 1 ,2,3
Phases 1 ,2,3
total 224.3
Side B
PM2.5
cyclone
None
113
113
4
5
6
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
5
1
1
3
1
102
113
QCM
Nephelometer
Photoacoustic
TEOMb
Dustrak b
make-up air
make-up air
cont.
cont.
cont.
cont.
cont.
total 226
Grand total 450.3
a. Proposed optional backup quartz filter behind Teflon.
b. Will be operated by DRI at no cost to EPA.
-------
Table 2-10. Numbers of samples collected during the Kansas City LDGV
Characterization Study
Run ID
Channel #
Pilot Study
Tunnel Blank
Test Vehicles
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Field Transport Blanks
Round 1
Daily Tunnel Blanks
Test Vehicles
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Weekly Calibration Vehicle Tests
Field/Transport Blanks
Round 2
Daily Tunnel Blanks
Test Vehicles
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Repeat Vehicle from Round 1
Weekly Calibration Vehicle Tests
Field/Transport Blanks
Total Round 1 and 2
Number of
Tests
3
3
6
3
60
250
15
12
12
60
230
10
25
12
12
Teflon
filter
7
3
9
18
3
33
60
750
45
36
12
903
60
690
30
75
36
12
903
1806
quartz
filter
8
3
9
18
3
33
60
750
45
36
12
903
60
690
30
75
36
12
903
1806
TIGF/XAD
9
3
3
6
3
15
60
250
15
12
12
349
60
230
10
25
12
12
349
698
canister
10
3
3
6
12
60
250
15
12
0
337
60
230
10
25
12
0
337
674
DNPH
cartridge
11
3
3
6
3
15
60
250
15
12
12
349
60
230
10
25
12
12
349
698
Optional Task During Pilot for NREL
Run ID
Channel #
Tunnel Blank
Test Vehicles
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Field Transport Blanks
Number of
Tests
2
2
4
0
Teflon
filter
7a
2
6
12
0
Quartz
filter a
7b
5
15
30
0
quartz
filter
8
2
6
12
0
TIGF/XAD
9
2
2
4
0
canister
10
2
2
4
DNPH
cartridge
11
2
2
4
0
20
50
20
a. Includes backup quartz filters for base tests at 47 C.
Notes: One dilution tunnel blanks will be collected daily during rounds 1 and 2 at the beginning of each
day of testing. Twelve sets of sampling media will be returned to the laboratory as field/transport blanks
per round.
76
-------
Table 2-11. Numbers of samples analyzed during the Kansas City LDGV
Characterization Study
Teflon filter
Pilot Study
Tunnel Blank
Test Vehicles
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Field Transport Blanks
Round 1
Daily Tunnel Blanks
Test Vehicles
Truck- Pre 1980
Truck- 1980 to 1990
Truck- 1991 to 1995
Truck- 1996 and newer
Car -Pre 1980
Car- 1980 to 1990
Car- 1991 to 1995
Car- 1996 and newer
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Weekly Calibration Vehicle Tests
Field/Transport Blanks
Round 2
Daily Tunnel Blanks
Test Vehicles
Repeat Vehicle from Round 1
Truck- Pre 1980
Truck- 1980 to 1990
Truck- 1991 to 1995
Truck- 1996 and newer
Car- Pre 1980
Car- 1980 to 1990
Car -1991 to 1995
Car - 1996 and newer
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Weekly Calibration Vehicle Tests
Field/Transport Blanks
Total Round 1 and 2
Tests
3
3
6
3
60
250
15
12
12
60
230
25
10
12
12
Composite
10
1
1
3
5
1
1
3
5
10
1
1
3
5
1
1
3
5
mass
3
9
18
3
33
60
750
45
36
12
903
60
690
75
30
36
12
903
1806
elements
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
6
38
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
6
38
76
quartz filter
OC/EC
3
9
18
3
33
60
12
9
18
30
18
12
27
30
45
36
12
309
60
12
9
18
30
18
12
27
30
30
36
12
294
603
Ions
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
6
38
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
6
38
76
TIGF/XAD
POC and
SVOC
3
2
4
3
12
4
3
6
4
17
4
3
6
4
17
34
TIGF
POC
1
2
3
6
2
2
3
2
3
18
6
2
2
3
2
3
18
36
XAD
SVOC
1
2
3
6
2
2
3
2
3
18
6
2
2
3
2
3
18
36
canister
VOC
3
3
6
12
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
32
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
32
64
DNPH
cartridge
Carbonyls
3
3
6
3
15
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
6
38
6
4
3
2
2
6
4
3
2
6
38
76
Optional Task During Pilot for NREL
Teflon filter quartz filter quartz filter TIGF/XAD TIGF
POC and
Tests mass elements OC/EC OC/EC Ions SVOC POC
DNPH
XAD canister cartridge
VOC Carbonyls
Pilot Study (Optional)
Tunnel Blank
Test Vehicles
Replicate Vehicle Tests
Field Transport Blanks
2
2
4
2
6
12
5
15
30
2
6
12
2
2
4
2
2
4
2
2
4
2
2
4
a. Includes backup quartz filters for base tests at 47 C.
Notes: This table does not include analyses for certification blanks from each lot of sampling media and
replicate analyses for determination of analytical precision. The costs for these samples are included in
per unit cost for each analysis.
77
-------
Table 2-12. Analysis list of inorganic species for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study
Species
Chloride (Cl~)
Nitrite (NO2~)
Nonvolatilized Nitrate (NO3~)
Phosphate (PO43")
Sulfate (SO4=)
Ammonium (NH4+)
Soluble Sodium (Na+)
Soluble Magnesium (Mg++)
Soluble Potassium (K+)
Soluble Calcium (Ca++)
Organic Carbon (OC)
Elemental Carbon (EC)
Sodium (Na)
Magnesium (Mg)
Aluminum (Al)
Silicon (Si)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Chlorine (Cl)
Patassium (K)
Calcium (Ca)
Titanium (Ti)
Vanadium (V)
Chromium (Cr)
Manganese (Mn)
Iron (Fe)
Analysis
Method3
1C
1C
1C
1C
1C
AC
AAS
AAS
AAS
AAS
TOR
TOR
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
MDLb
(|jg/filter)
1 .5005
1 .5005
1 .5005
1 .5005
1 .5005
1 .5005
0.2362
0.0547
0.1498
0.0979
2.7590
2.7590
0.9533
0.3456
0.1382
0.0864
0.0778
0.0691
0.1382
0.0835
0.0634
0.0403
0.0346
0.0259
0.0230
0.0202
Species
Cobalt (Co)
Nickel (Ni)
Copper (Cu)
Zinc (Zn)
Gallium (Ga)
Arsenic (As)
Selenium (Se)
Bromine (Br)
Rubidium (Rb)
Strontium (Sr)
Yttrium (Y)
Zerconium (Zr)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Palladium (Pd)
Silver (Ag)
Cadmium (Cd)
Indium (In)
Tin (Sn)
Antimony (Sb)
Barium (Ba)
Lanthanum (La)
Gold (Au)
Mercury (Hg)
Thallium (TI)
Lead (Pb)
Uranium (U)
Analysis
Method3
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
XRF
MDLb
(|jg/filter)
0.0115
0.0115
0.0144
0.0144
0.0259
0.0230
0.0173
0.0144
0.0144
0.0144
0.0173
0.0230
0.0374
0.1526
0.1670
0.1670
0.1786
0.2333
0.2477
0.7171
0.8554
0.0432
0.0346
0.0346
0.0403
0.0317
a IC=ion chromatography. AC=automated colorimetry. AAS=atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
TOR=thermal/optical reflectance. XRF=x-ray fluorescence.
b Minimum detectable limit (MDL) is the concentration at which instrument response equals three times the standard
deviation of the response to a known concentration of zero.
Additional Notes
1. Boron (specified in Section 3.3.2.2 of RFP) cannot be done by XRF.
2. XRF can be replaced with ICP-MS with greater sensitivity. However, cannot measure Sulfur and Chlorine and cost
twice as much as XRF. Three Teflon filters can be extracted together with ICP-MS to reduce cost.
78
-------
Table 2-13. Relative detection limits for XRF and ICP-MS elemental analysis.
XRF
Species
Boron (B)
Sodium (Na)
Aluminum (Al)
Phosphorus (P)
Sulfur (S)
Chlorine (Cl)
Silicon (Si)
Calcium (Ca)
Chromium (Cr)
Manganese (Mn)
Iron (Fe)
Nickel (Ni)
Copper (Cu)
Zinc (Zn)
Arsenic (As)
Mercury (Hg)
Lead (Pb)
K
Ti
V
Co
Ga
Se
Br
Rb
Sr
Y
Zr
Mo
Pd
Ag
Cd
In
Sn
Sb
Ba
La
Au
Tl
U
ICP-MS
Protocol A Protocol B Protocol C
ICP/XRF MDLb MDLb MDLb mdl
sensitivity (|jg/filter) (|jg/filter) (|jg/filter) ug/sample
na
na
1.1920 0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.5364 0.
2.2648 0.
9.5360 0.
0.0894 0.
0. 5304 0.
3.2780 0.
6.5560 0.
9.5360 0.
30. 9920 0.
89.4000 0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
1192
0668
0596
1192
0751
0536
0226
0191
0179
0106
0131
0131
0191
0310
0358
0727
0346
0298
0105
0226
0143
0119
0119
0131
0155
0203
0322
1311
1430
1430
1550
2026
2146
6198
7390
0370
0298
0274
na
na
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0858
0477
0417
0882
0524
0381
0167
0131
0131
0075
0091
0091
0131
0215
0262
0513
0250
0203
0074
0167
0103
0086
0081
0093
0110
0143
0226
0906
1025
1025
1132
1430
1550
4410
5245
0262
0215
0203
na
na
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0429
0238
0215
0441
0262
0191
0080
0067
0064
0037
0045
0045
0067
0108
0131
0262
0119
0104
0037
0081
0051
0043
0041
0046
0055
0070
0113
0453
0513
0513
0572
0739
0763
2146
2622
0131
0105
0099
na
0 . 1000
0 . 1000
na
na
na
na
0 . 1000
0 . 0100
0.0020
0.2000
0 . 0200
0.0040
0 . 0020
0 . 0020
0 . 0010
0.0004
Minimum detectable limit (MDL) is the concentration at which instrument response equals three times the standard
deviation of the response to a known concentration of zero.
na - not available
Cost: XRF Protocol A ($21/sample), XRFb ($35/sample) XRFc ($128/sample) for 15 elements and 23 additional at no cost.
Cost for ICP-MS ($17/sample for digestion plus $19 for first element plus $2 for each additional element); $58 per sample
for 12 elements
79
-------
Table 2-14. Analysis list of hydrocarbons and carbonyl compounds for the
Kansas City LDGV Emission Characterization Study
Ethane
Ethene
Acetylene
propene
propane
isoButane
IButene+iButylene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
t-2-Butene
c-2-Butene
3-Me-1-Butene
isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Me-1-Butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
t-2-Pentene
c-2-Pentene
2-Me-2-Butene
22DiMeButane
CycloPentene
4-Me-1-Pentene
3-Me-1-Pentene
CycloPentane
23DiMeButane
MTBE
2-MePentane
22-DiMePentane
3-MePentane
2-Me-1-Pentene
1-Hexene
n-Hexane
t-3-Hexene
t-2-Hexene
2-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Me-2-Pentene
c-3-Hexene
c-2-Hexene
t-3-Me-2-Pentene
Hydrocarbons
MeCyPentane
2,4-DiMePentane
223TriMeButane
1 MeCypentene
Benzene
SSDiMePentane
CycloHexane
4MeHexene
2MeHexane
23DiMePentane
Cyclohexene
SMeHexane
13DiMeCyPentane
SEtPentane
1-Heptene
224TrMePentane
t-3-Heptene
n-Heptane
244TMe-1-Pentene
MeCyHexane
25DiMeHexane
24DiMeHexane
234TrMePentane
Toluene
23DiMeHexane
2MeHeptane
4MeHeptane
SMeHeptane
Hexanal
225TMHexane
Octene-1
UDMeCyHexane
n-Octane
235TriMeHexane+Bgr.
24DiMeHeptane
44DiMeHeptane
26DiMeHeptane
25DiMeHeptane
SSDiMeHeptane
EtBenzene
m/p-xylene
2MeOctane
SMeOctane
Styrene+heptanal
o-xylene
Nonene-1
n-Nonane
IPropBenzene
IPropCyHexane
26DiMeOctane
alpha-pinene
36DiMeOctane
nPropBenzene
mEtToluene
pEtToluene
135TriMeBenzene
oEtToluene
beta-pinene
1-Decene+bkgd
124TriMeBenzene
n-Decane
IButBenzene
sButBenzene
123TriMeBenzene
Limonene
Indan
Indene
13diethyl benzene
14diethyl benzene
12diethyl benzene
2-propylToluene
IPrToluene
n-Undecane
1245tetraMeBenzene
1235tetraMeBenzene
1234tetraMeBenzene
IMelndan
1-Dodecene
Naphthalene+Decanal
n-Dodecane
Carbonyl Compounds
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methacrolein
Butyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Glyoxal
Valeraldehyde
m-Tolualdehyde
Hexanaldehyde
a. Canister/GC-FID or MS with MLD = 0.1 ppbC.
b. DNPH cartrideges/HPLC-UV with MDL = 0.1 ppbv.
80
-------
Table 2-15. Analysis list of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for the Kansas City
LDGV Emission Characterization Study
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH)'
Naphthalene
2-methylnaphthalene
1 -methylnaphthalene
Biphenyl
2-Methylbiphenyl
1 +2ethylnaphthalene
2,6+2,7-dimethylnaphthalene
1,3+1,6+1,7dimethylnaphth
1,4+1,5+2,3-dimethylnaphth
Acenaphthylene
1,2-dimethylnaphthalene
3-Methylbiphenyl
Acenaphthene
4-Methylbiphenyl
Bibenzyl
Dibenzofuran
A-trimethylnaphthalene
B-trimethylnaphthalene
C-trimethylnaphthalene
E-trimethylnaphthalene
F-trimethylnaphthalene
2,3,5+l-trimethylnaphthalene
J-trimethylnaphthalene
2,4,5-trimethyl naphthalene
Fluorene
1,4,5-trimethyl naphthalene
A-methylfluorene
1-methylfluorene
B-methylfluorene
9-fluorenone
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Xanthone
Acenaphthenequinone
A-methylphenanthrene
2-methylphenanthrene
Perinaphthenone
B-methylphenanthrene
C-methylphenanthrene
1 -methylphenanthrene
Anthrone
9-methylanthracene
Anthraquinone
3,6-dimethylphenanthrene
A-dimethylphenanthrene
B-dimethylphenanthrene
C-dimethylphenanthrene
D-dimethylphenanthrene
E-dimethylphenanthrene
1,7-dimethylphenanthrene
Fluoranthene
1-MeFI+C-MeFI/Py
Pyrene
9-Anthraaldehyde
Retene
B-MePy/MeFI
C-MePy/MeFI
D-MePy/MeFI
4-methylpyrene
1-methylpyrene
2,3-Benzofluorene
Benzonaphthothiophene
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzanthrone
Benz(a)anthracene-7,12-dione
5+6-methylchrysene
7-methylbenz(a)anthracene
1,4-chrysenequinone
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
BeP
BaP
Perylene
7-methylbenzo(a)pyrene
9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7(8H)-one
lndeno[123-cd]pyrene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Coronene
Nitro-PAH b
1 -Nitronaphthalene
2-Nitronaphthalene
2-Nitrobiphenyl
3-Nitrobiphenyl
4-Nitrobiphenyl
1,3-Dinitronaphthalene
1,5-Dinitronaphthalene
5-Nitroacenaphthene
2-Nitrofluorene
9-Nitroanthracene
4-Nitrophenanthrene
9-Nitrophenanthrene
3-Nitrophenanthrene
1,8-Dinitronaphthalene
2-Nitrofluoranthene
3-Nitrofluoranthene
1-Nitropyrene
2,7-Dinitrofluorene
7-Nitrobenz(a)anthracene
6-Nitrochrysene
1,3-Dinitropyrene
1,6-Dinitropyrene
1,8-Dinitropyrene
9,10-Dinitroanthracene
6-Nitrobenz(a)pyrene
a. TIGF/XAD and GC/MS with MDL = 0.02 ug/sample
b. TIGF/XAD and GC/MS with MDL = 0.01 ug/sample
81
-------
Table 2-16. Analysis list of hopanes, steranes and alkanes for the Kansas City
LDGV Emission Characterization Study
Hopanes and Steranes'
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14IJ(H)-cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-cholestane&C29-20S13B(H),17a(H)-diasterane
C28-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastane
C29-20R5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-stigmastane
C29-20S5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-stigmastane
18a(H),21 B(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),18a(H),21B(H)-25,28,30-Trisnorhopane
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-stigmastane
17a(H),21 B(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane
17a(H),21 B(H)-30-Norhopane
17b(H),21 a(H)-30-Norhopane
17a(H),21B(H)-Hopane
17IJ(H),21a(H)-hopane
22S-17a(H),21 B(H)-30-Homohopane
22R-17a(H),21 B(H)-30-Homohopane
17B(H),21B(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21 B(H)-30,31 -Bishomohopane
22R-17a(H),21B(H)-30,31-Bishomohopane
22S-17a(H),21 B(H)-30,31,32-Trisomohopane
22R-17a(H),21B(H)-30,31,32-Trishomohopane
Alkanes '
norfarnesane
heptylcyclohexane
farnesane
octylcyclohexane
nonylcyclohexane
norpristane
hexadecane
heptadecane
decylcyclohexane
pristane
undecylcyclohexane
octadecane
nonadecane
phytane
dodecylcyclohexane
tridecylcyclohexane
tetradecylcyclohexane
eicosane
heneicosane
pentadecylcyclohexane
hexadecylcyclohexane
docosane
triacosane
heptadecylcyclohexane
octadecylcyclohexane
tetracosane
pentacosane
hexacosane
nonadecylcyclohexane
eicosylcyclohexane
heptacosane
octacosane
nonacosane
triacontane
hentriacontane
dotriacontane
tritriacontane
tetra triacontane
penta triacontane
hexatriacontane
a. TIGF/XAD and GC/MS with MDL = 0.02 ug/sample
a. TIGF/XAD and GC/MS with MDL = 0.1 ug/sample
82
-------
Table 2-17. Analysis list of polar organics for the Kansas City LDGV Emission
Characterization Study
Analytical Standards
hexanoic acid
heptanoic acid
methylmalonic
guaiacol
benzoic acid
octanoic acid
butenedioic (maleic) acid
butanedioic (succinic) acid
4-me-guaiacol
me-succinic acid
nonanoic acid
4-ethyl-guaiacol
syringol
glutaric acid
2-methylglutaric
3-methylglutaric acid
decanoic acid
4-allyl-guaiacol (eugenol)
4-methyl-syringol
hexanedioic (adipic) acid
cis-pinonic acid
3-methyladipic acid
4-formyl-guaiacol (vanillin)
undecanoic acid
isoeugenol
heptanedioic (pimelic) acid
acetovanillone
dodecanoic (lauric) acid
phthalic acid
suberic acid
levoglucosan
syringaldehyde
tridecanoic acid
isophthalic acid
vanillic acid
homovanillic acid
azelaic acid
myristoleic acid
myristic acid
sebacic acid
syringic acid
pentadecanoic acid
undecanedioic acid
palmitoleic acid
palmitic acid
isostearic acid
dodecanedioic acid
heptadecanoic acid
traumatic acid
1 ,1 1-undecanedicarboxylic acid
oleic acid
elaidic acid
stearic acid
1 ,12-dodecanedicarboxylic acid
8,15-pimaradien-18-oic acd
pimaric acid
nonadecanoic acid
isopimaric acid
dehydroabietic acid
abietic acid
eicosanoic acid
heneicosanoic acid
docosanoic acid
tricosanoic acid
tetracosanoic acid
cholesterol
Classification
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
aromatic acid
alkanoic acid
alkenedioic acid
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
alkanedioic acid
alkanoic acid
methoxy phenol
methoxy phenol
alkanedioic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkanoic acid
methoxy phenol
methoxy phenol
alkanedioic acid
aromatic acid
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
alkanoic acid
methoxy phenol
alkanedioic acid
methoxy phenol
alkanoic acid
aromatic diacid
alkanedioic acid
carbohydrate
methoxy phenol
alkanoic acid
aromatic diacid
methoxy acid
methoxy acid
alkanedioic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
methoxy acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkanoic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanedioic acid
alkenoic acid
alkenoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanedioic acid
resin acid
resin acid
alkanoic acid
resin acid
resin acid
resin acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
alkanoic acid
sterol
Potential
Organic Marker Type
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
secondary aerosol
meat cooking
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
meat cooking
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
secondary aerosol
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
wood smoke
meat cooking
MDL
microgram/sample
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
83
-------
Table 2-18. Potential instrument configuration for continuous and quasi-continuous measurement of PM
Instrument
Manufacturer
OCM, RPM-101
Booker Systems,
UK
DPM Monitor,
1105a
R & P, Albany, NY
Dataram - 4
Thermo MIE,
Bedford MA
Aethalometer, AE2
McGee Scientific,
Berkeley, CA
Instrument Type
(Measurement)
Inertial Micro-
Balance
(PM Mass)
Inertial Micro-
Balance
(PM Mass)
Nephelometer
(PM light
Scattering)
Light Absorption
(Black Carbon and
PAH)
Sensor
Technology
Quartz Crystal/
Frequency Deficit
Tapered
Element/Filter
Frequency Deficit
Photo Diode/Two
Wavelength
Photo Diode/Light
Absorption at
SOOnm and 370nm
Time Resolution
(sec.)
1
15
1
300
Sensor Operating Environment
Temperature Range
(°Q
35 to 50
35 to 50
35 to 50
20 to 40
Sample Flow Rate
(Lpm)
Ito5
1 to 3.5
I to 2
5
a The instruments listed are an example only, based on the descriptions in Section 3.3. The contractor may propose alternative
instruments.
84
-------
Table 2-19. Potential instruments for integral measurement of PM
Instrument
Manufacturer
Filter Holder 6 186
R & P, Albany, NY
Thermo-Optical
Carbon Aerosol Lab
Analyzer
Sunset Laboratory,
Forest Grove, OR
Filter Holder 6 186
R & P, Albany, NY
Filter Holder 6 186
R & P, Albany, NY
Filter Holder 6 186
R & P, Albany, NY
Summa Cannister
Anderson
Instruments,
Atlanta, GA
DNPH Cartridge
Anderson
Instruments,
Atlanta, GA
Instrument Type
(Measurement)
Gravimetric Micro-
Balance (separate
filters for LA92 Phase
1 and LA92 Phases 2-
4.(PM Mass)
Carbon Aerosol
Analysis
(PM Elemental and
Organic Carbon
Mass)
ICP-MS and/or XRF
(PM Element Mass)b
1C and AC
(PM Water Soluble
Ions)
GC/MS (PMSVOC)
GC/MS (VOCs)
GC/MS (Aldehydes
and Ketones)
Sensor
Technology
Gravimetric Micro-
Balance
FID Detection of
Thermaly Liberated
CO2
Analysis Dependent
Analysis Dependent
Analysis Dependent
Analysis Dependent
Analysis Dependent
Suggested
Sample Media
Teflo Filter
Pre-Fired Quartz
Filter
Teflo Filter
Quartz Filter
XAD-4 Coated Filter
Summa
Cannister
DNPH Cartridges
Sample Operating Environment
Temperature Range
(°C)
35 to 50
35 to 50
35 to 50
35 to 50
35 to 50
35 to 50
35 to 50
Sample Flow Rate
(Lpm)
50 to 70
2tol5
50 to 70
50 to 70
50 to 70
Sample Dependent
Sample Dependent
85
-------
mixing ratio in diluted gasoline vehicle exhaust (ppbC)
9000
30000
8000 -
7000 -
6000 -
01 5000 -
S
4000 -
3000 -
2000 -
1000
A propene - warm starts
A propene - cold starts
D ethene - warm starts
• ethene - cold starts
200
400
600
1,3 butadiene
800
1000
-- 25000
-4 0
1200
Figure 2-9. Correlation of 1,3-butadiene with ethene and propene for 57 LDGVs
tested during the Gas/Diesel PM Split Study (Preliminary, unpublished data)
86
-------
3.0 Organization
3.1 ERG Team Members
ERG's team brings to the PM characterization study a group of researchers and analysts
with broad and complementary skills. Our key team members are recognized by their peers as
leaders in their respective fields of study. Table 3-1 lists our key team members along with their
anticipated role in the project, highlighting their relevant expertise and experience.
Table 3-1. Key ERG Team Members
Key Personnel / Role
Relevant Expertise and Experience
Sandeep Kishan (ERG)
Project Manager / Task
Leader for Analysis and
Reporting
Project Manager for EPA's previous Driving Modes Study, a large scale
effort involving vehicle recruitment, instrumentation, data collection and
analysis, and extensive QA/QC. Managed recent effort to collect on-board
activity data for off-road vehicles for TxDOT. Contributed to the
development and testing of EPA's mobile source model MOBILE6, and an
active participant in the FACA committee for the development of the
MOVES model. Led the effort to develop an enhanced version of PARTS
for Texas (PART5-TX) to incorporate I/M effects on PM emissions.
Andrew Burnetts (ERG)
Task Leader for QAPP /
Technical Lead for RSD
andPEMS/PAMS
Deployment
Specialty areas include emissions evaluations using loaded mode tests,
remote sensing devices and their applications, and PM emissions
assessments. Recruited vehicles for emissions testing and/or PAMS
instrumentation in Texas, Mexico, and Bangkok. Collected on-road
emissions data for buses in Bangkok, combining second-by-second data for
hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, oxygen,
and smoke opacity with driving pattern information such as speed,
acceleration, throttle position, and engine rpm to compare buses under
similar driving conditions. Technical lead for data collection and analysis for
PARTS-TX model development, as well as RSD data collection and
emissions characterization studies in Kansas City, Phoenix, Dallas, and
California.
Dr. Tim DeFries (ERG)
Peer Review of Statistical
Analysis and QAPP
Expertise in mobile source emissions modeling, plume opacity, experimental
design, and data analysis using statistical and neural network techniques.
Daily familiarity with ordinary least squares regression, multiple linear
regression, non-linear regression, analysis of variance, logistic regression,
variance stabilizing transformations, and measurement-error modeling. Has
used statistics to develop the QAPP/sampling plans for EPA's Driving
Modes Study, representative driving cycles for on and off-road vehicles,
exhaust and evaporative emissions of "off-FTP" driving, and to design a test
program to collect data to improve evaporative emissions modeling.
Robert Slott (Consultant)
Peer Review for RSD
Distinguished lecturer at Massachusetts Institute of Technology on issues
dealing with mobile source pollution. Member of numerous national panels
reviewing the effectiveness of remote sensing and related technologies and
methods. Widely respected as an innovative thinker and student of human
nature in the mobile source control industry.
William "Butch" Crews
(BKI)
Supported EPA's Environmental Characterization Apportionment Branch
(ECAB) emissions characterization projects for 31 years. Managed on site
87
-------
Key Personnel / Role
Relevant Expertise and Experience
Task Leader for Vehicle
Testing
operations, analytical, data processing, and machine shop support.
Experience covers all aspects of the testing process from 2 and 4 stroke
small light duty off-road and marine engines, through light-duty, alternative-
fuel vehicles, to heavy-duty diesel engines. Has prepared Standard Operating
Procedures and QC/QA plans and reports on all facets of emissions
measurement. Led the design and evaluation of an injection system for
formaldehyde, oxygenated compounds, and hydrocarbons into exhaust
dilution tunnels to determine compound recoveries during modal operation.
Richard Snow (BKI)
On-Site Technical Lead
for Vehicle Testing
Helped plan, implement, and supervise projects to determine emissions from
vehicles operated under a variety of conditions. Developed procedures to
improve testing capabilities, and developed instrumentation and equipment
for simulation of vehicle operating conditions. Leads a team providing on
site operations support for the Environmental Characterization
Apportionment Branch (ECAB). Played a key role in developing the
operational and analytical capabilities of a transportable dynamometer
system for performing independent, remote field studies to characterize
emissions. Leads efforts to modify and fine tune mobile source operational
and sampling equipment to meet specific project goals and objectives.
Dr. Eric Fujita (DRI)
Technical Lead for PM
Sampling and Analysis
Over 20 years of experience in managing and conducting air quality studies.
Principal author of the field study plans for the 2000 Central California
Ozone Study, 1997 Southern California Ozone Study (SCOS97-NARSTO),
and the 1996/97 Northern Front Range Air Quality Study. Primary research
interests is in the application of data from ambient monitoring programs, on-
road tunnel measurements, in-use motor vehicle surveillance and inspection
and maintenance programs, and from remote sensing to evaluate the
effectiveness of vehicle emission control programs. Coordinated the
laboratory comparisons of hydrocarbon measurements during the SCOS97-
NARTSO, COAST and NARSTO-Northeast ozone studies.
Dr. Pat Arnott (DRI)
Technical Assistance for
PM Sampling and
Analysis
Develops and deploys photoacoustic instruments for measurement of black
carbon emission from vehicles in source sampling, and in ambient air quality
studies. Measurements are often combined with other real time particulate
emission measurements to establish detailed knowledge of the conditions
giving rise to most of the black carbon and particulate emission to the
atmosphere, and their environmental impacts. He teaches in the
Atmospheric Sciences Program at the University of Nevada, Reno.
NuStats Team (Robert
Santos, Mia Zmud,
Stacey Bricka)
Task Leaders for Vehicle
Recruitment
Over the past 18 years, NuStats has become known for innovative survey
planning, data collection, and methodological research. Since inception,
NuStats has conducted more than 300 large-scale studies in more than 40
states and virtually every major metropolitan area of the United States. The
firm provides a full array of research services: study management, study
design, statistical sampling, data collection, database management, data
analysis, geographic analysis and interpretation of results. NuStats draws
upon the expertise of its research staff and utilizes such tools as computer-
assisted telephone interviewing (CATI), behavioral diaries, face-to-face
interviews, self-administered mail out questionnaires, computer-assisted
personal interviewing (CAPI) using hand held computers, Web-based
surveys, and personalized (very small) GPS units.
Dr. Imad Khalek (SwRI)
Has extensive experience in particulate emissions from internal combustion
engines. An expert in dilution system design and particle measurements from
88
-------
Key Personnel / Role
Relevant Expertise and Experience
Peer Review and QC for
Continuous PM
Monitoring and Analysis
combustion sources. Research efforts on ultra-fine particulate emissions
have gained worldwide attention. Has investigated the influence of engine
stabilization, exhaust catalysts and filters (traps), dilution systems, and
dilution variables, on particle size distribution and number emission
measurements. Also worked on modeling of binary homogenous nucleation
of sulfuric acid and water droplet, and growth by hetero-molecular
condensation and coagulation during exhaust dilution. Work has contributed
to future particulate emission measurements and regulations.
As indicated in the table above, our key staff are fully qualified to conduct their
respective technical and managerial tasks. Our overall management structure is organized
functionally according to the requirements of the RFP. The following chart describes the
organization of our team, showing specific responsibilities for the major project activities.
89
-------
EPA Project Officer and Sponsors
Project Manager
Sandeep Kishan
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Andrew Burnette - Task Leader
VEHICLE RECRUITMENT
Rob Santos - Task Leader
Registration/
RSD Analysis
—Rob Santos
—Mia Zmud
—Tim DeFries
-Rob Santos
-Kelly Govea
-Rick Baker
-Dr. Robert Slott
—Rob Santos
—Kelly Govea
-Andrew Burnette
-Rick Baker
-Dr. Robert Slott
Tim DeFries
William Crews
Eric Fujita
Rob Santos
ANALYSIS & REPORTING
Sandeep Kishan - Task Leader
Criteria
Emissions
E
PM Emissions
Analysis
William Crews
Bob Slott
VEHICLE TESTING
William Crews - Task Leader
Continuous PM
Measurement
Imad Khalek
— PatArnott
Fuel/Oil
RSD
—William Crews
1—Lab Support
Andrew Burnette—
Dr. Robert Slott—
'Eric Fujita
-PatArnott
-Barbara Zielinska
- Judy Chow
I—willi
MSOD Reporting
William Gerber
Sandeep Kishan —
William Crews —
Rob Santos
- William Crews
" Michael Sabisch
- William Crews
- Eric Fujita
- Imad Khalek
— PatArnott
- Barbara Zielinska
1— Judy Chow
Andrew Burnette
— Dr. Robert Slott
Andrew Burnette
— Michael Sabisch
1— William Crews
Figure 3-1. Project Management Organization
-------
3.2 Communication with EPA Project Officer and Sponsors
The ERG Project Manger will coordinate all communications between the project team
and EPA. Specifically, our Project Manager will communicate directly with the Project Officer
regarding all technical matters. (Matters regarding contract issues will be directed to the EPA
Contracting Officer, with the Project Officer included in all correspondence.) Questions or
issues directed toward any of the Project Sponsors will be routed through the EPA Project
Officer as well.
The ERG Project Manager will not authorize any substantive or significant change in
operation procedures without first receiving written authorization of specific technical direction
from the Project Officer. Similarly, comments and/or requested changes to deliverables will not
be acted upon without written technical direction from the Project Officer.
All deliverables and required data files will be provided to the Project Officer in
electronic form via a password protected Project Website. (Additional hard copies of
deliverables will also be provided to the Project Officer as needed.) The Project Officer may
also make this information available to the Project Sponsors at his discretion by providing them
with password access as well. The Project Website is organized to provide easy access to the
following:
• Project Status Reports
• Bi-Weekly Meeting Minutes
• Draft Reports
• Final Reports
• FTP-link for data transfer of large files (e.g., archived raw vehicle emissions data,
vehicle registration data)
The website will also contain user instructions for downloading files, and a description of
the process for providing comments or asking questions of the ERG Project Manager and/or
Technical Staff. (The website will also serve as an effective communication tool for the ERG
Team - see below.)
Bi-weekly calls will be held with the EPA Project Officer, arranged in advance. The
ERG Project Officer will participate, as well as relevant Task Leaders and Technical Staff, as
appropriate. Progress reports regarding schedule and budget will be generated by ERG in
advance of these calls using MS Project, and the reports distributed to all participants for review.
91
-------
Calls will cover schedule and budget status, technical progress as well as any deviations from the
schedule, budget, or QAPP, and remedial actions taken/planned. Call minutes will be taken and
distributed by email to all participants, and posted on the Project Website.
ERG will also provide the Project Officer with Monthly Progress Reports, as specified in
the RFP. In addition to technical progress, ERG will include itemized reports of incentive
expenditures once vehicle testing has begun. Any vehicle repair costs or other non-labor related
expenditures (e.g., support vehicle rental costs) will also be itemized.
The ERG Project Manager will assist EPA and the Sponsors with all audit activities, and
assure full cooperation of all team members with any such effort. The Project Manager will also
review all questions and comments resulting from vehicle emission test data audits. Any errors
or reporting discrepancies will be addressed jointly between the Project Manager and the EPA
Project Officer.
92
-------
4.0 Project Schedule
The recruitment task and the pilot testing task will be started as soon as our work plan is
approved (anticipated on April 15, 2004). The pilot testing task is scheduled to be completed by
May 30, 2004. A draft pilot study report will be delivered by June. The project schedule and a
list of project deliverables is presented in the following tables.
Table 4-1. Proposed Project Schedule
Project Start
Kick-off Meeting
Project Workplan
Draft Quality Assurance Documents
Pilot Vehicle Testing
Final Quality Assurance Documents
Vehicle Recruitment Plan (including cohort evaluation)
Begin Vehicle Recruitment (Round 1)
Begin Vehicle Testing (Round 1)
End Vehicle Testing (Round 1)
Interim Report on Round 1
Begin Vehicle Recruitment (Round 2)
Begin Vehicle Testing (Round 2)
End Vehicle Testing (Round 2)
Draft Final Report
Final Report
March 1, 2004
March 10-11,2004
April 12, 2004
April 19, 2004
May 10, 2004
June 20, 2004
June 15, 2004
June 25, 2004
July 7, 2004
September 20, 2004
November 15, 2004
December 15, 2004
January 10, 2005
March 30, 2005
June 30, 2005
August 30, 2005
93
-------
Table 4-2. List of Deliverables
Task 1 - QAPP
Project Work Plan
QAPP
QMP
April 12, 2004
April 20, 2004
April 20, 2004
Task 2 - Recruitment
Cohort Frame Analysis
List of Non-respondent Criteria for EPA approval
Monthly Status Reports
Cohort Recruitment and Non-Respondent Analysis
Vehicle Registration Database (to Project Officer)
Cohort/Vehicle Summary Analysis Report
Pilot Study Report
Vehicle Recruitment Sample Plan
Recruitment Log, Round 1 (e.g., record of contact
attempts, outcomes, demographics of informant, etc.)
Post-Round 1 Vehicle Analysis
Recruitment Log, Round 2
June 15,2004
May 30, 2004
Beginning May 15, 2004
June 10, 2004
April 25, 2004 l
June 5, 2004
June 20, 2004
June 10, 2004
October 15, 2004
November 15, 2004
April 30, 2005
Task 3 - Vehicle Testing
Monthly Project Report
Pilot Study Report
Weekly Excel Spreadsheet Reports: Round 1
Weekly Excel Spreadsheet Reports: Round 2
Monthly
June 20, 2004
1 week after testing for Round 1
1 week after testing for Round 2
Task 4 - Speciation Tasks
Round 1
Provide Validated Speciation Database
Provide Time-Matched Continuous PM/EC Data
January 15,2005
November 15, 2004
Round 2
Provide Validated Speciation Database
Provide Time-Matched Continuous PM/EC Data
June 15, 2005
April 30, 2005
Other Reports
Final MSOD/Excel Database
Draft Final Report
Final Report
July 10, 2005
June 30, 2005
August 30, 2005
Meetings/Other
Kickoff Meeting
Bi-weekly Conference Calls (notes via email)
Project Website Deployment
March 10, 2004
Beginning second week in March 2004
March 25, 2004
Pending cooperation of respective state DMVs.
94
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix EE
Retest Vehicle Information
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Round 1 Run #
84058
84150
84036
84078
84104
84108
84069
84347
84071
84097
84305
84063
84042
84037
84298
84296
84332
84341
84088
84151
84055
84125
84119
84084
84040
84329
84342
84342
84349
84338
84344
84339
84113
84110
84115
84146
84048
84309
84188
84171
84211
84263
84271
84271
84336
84381
Round 2 Run #
84393
84394
84396
84399
84401
84402
84404
84406
84407
84408
84409
84411
84412
84413
84415
84416
84418
84418
84419
84420
84422
84424
84425
84428
84430
84433
84437
84442
84444
84445
84446
84448
84456
84463
84463
84467
84469
84470
84472
84474
84475
84477
84482
84484
84489
84528
Year, Make, Model
1999 Chrysler 300M
2000 Honda Odyssey
1995 Ford Escort
1997 Honda Accord
1998 Plymouth Voyager
1991 Honda Civic
1997 Dodge Caravan
1995 Toyota Corolla
1989 Pontiac GrandAm
2002 Mercury Sable
1999 Chevrolet Malibu
1996 Saturn SC
1996 Honda Civic
1979 Ford F250PU
1999 Dodge Durango
1998 Honda Civic
1997 Pontiac Grand Am
1997 Pontiac Grand Am
1998 Chevrolet Lumina
2000 Honda Accord
1998 Jeep Cherokee
1995 Ford Explorer
1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo
1998 Chevrolet Malibu
1990 Dodge Spirit
1997 Jeep Wrangler
1994 Toyota Camry
1994 Toyota Camry
2003 Chevrolet Tracker
2001 Saturn Sedan
2000 Toyota Sienna
1999 Plymouth Voyager
1993 Pontiac Grand Prix
1995 Ford Contour
1995 Ford Contour
1988 Ford Ranger PU
1989 Dodge Caravan
1973 Mercedes 280 SE
1977 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
1988 Honda Civic
1986 Ford Tempo
1989 Dodge Ram 50
1979 BuickLasabre
1979 BuickLesabre
1987 Toyota PU
1994 Mercury Grand Marquis
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix FF
Kansas City Fuels Analysis Complete
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
14rMcp€5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13619
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/19/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13619 Comments: 02 of 35; 181; 08-19-04
567ELT(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
' 552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
1 75 Parts Per Million
6.32 PS 1
36.4 Volume Percent
80.7 Volume Percent
35.09 Volume Percent
7.6 Volume Percent
1 .85 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.95 Volumn Percent
35.5 Volume Percent
1 .8 Volume Percent
0.75878 60/60F
54.98 Degrees API
0.75803 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.7 Degrees F
146.8 Degrees F
227.5 Degrees F
328.8 Degrees F
419.2 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.8 mL
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
. MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1 /26/05
1 /26/05
1/26/05
1 /26/05
1 /26/05
1/26/05
1 /26/05
1 /26/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14~Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13619 page 2 of 2
585 t-Butqnol • byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14'Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13620
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13620 Comments:
624MHA(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanoi by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl 319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
1/19/05.
03 of 35; 68; 7-28-04
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
73 Parts Per Million
6.8 PS 1
41 .8 Volume Percent
81 .2 Volume Percent
28.84 Volume Percent
1 2.7 Volume Percent
0.98 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.9 Volumn Percent
30.1 Volume Percent
0.95 Volume Percent
0.75036 60/60F
57.08 Degrees API
0.74962 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
1 00 Degrees F
137.7 Degrees F
217.9 Degrees F
341 .4 Degrees F
431.4 Degrees F
0.7 mL
98.2 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Anaiys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
1 /25/05
1 /25/05
1/25/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1 /26/05
1/26/05
1 /26/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13620 Page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amy! Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13621
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/19/05.
Kansas City Samples-QQA FTAG: 13621 Comments: 4 of 35; (3) License #; 7/13/04
voc
Season: Winter
042
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol by
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
210 Parts Per Million
8.1 2 PS 1
47.8 Volume Percent
83.1 Volume Percent
26.17 Volume Percent
8.3 Volume Percent
1 .02 Volume Percent
1 .02 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
26.7 Volume Percent
1 Volume Percent
5.34 Volumn Percent
0.73811 60/60F
60.21 Degrees API
0.73738 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
93.9 Degrees F
127.4 Degrees F
206.1 Degrees F
332.8 Degrees F
431.1 Degrees F
0.8 ml
97.7 mL
1.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
' NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1 /26/05
2/14/05
-------
14~Mar'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13621 page 2of 2
584 Isopropanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13622
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13622 Comments:
UTI326
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol . by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
'D86
D86
D86
D86
• D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/19/05.
5 of 35; 330; (Ks.); 9-16-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
75 Parts Per Million
6.11 PS I
37.2 Volume Percent
78.4 Volume Percent
31.19 Volume Percent
10 Volume Percent
1.44 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.42 Volumn Percent
32.4 Volume Percent
1.4 Volume Percent
0.75655 60/60F
55.53 Degrees API
0.7558 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.8 Degrees F
147.7 Degrees F
225.1 Degrees F
345.9 Degrees F
434.5 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.9 mL
1.3mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13622 Page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanoi byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13623
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/19/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13623 Comments: 6of 35; #148; Missouri; 8/12/04
553CLW(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D36D6
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
150 Parts Per Million
6.56 PS 1
39 Volume Percent
80.7 Volume Percent
33.34 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1 .53 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.96 Volumn Percent
34.9 Volume Percent
1 .5 Volume Percent
0.75781 60/60F
55.22 Degrees API
0.75706 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
102.4 Degrees F
143.1 Degrees F
223.2 Degrees F
334.4 Degrees F
424.4 Degrees F
0.8 mL
98.1 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
1 /26/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
1 /25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1 /26/05
1/26/05
1 /26/05
1 /26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13623 Page2of2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14-Mar'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13624
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/19/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13624 Comments: 7 of 35; 44; 7-23-04
545MC3(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
' 584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.47 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
199 Parts Per Million
7.75 PS I
39.9 Volume Percent
81.5 Volume Percent
32.22 Volume Percent
8 Volume Percent
1.77 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.47 Weight Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.4 Volumn Percent
33.4 Volume Percent
1.74 Volume Percent
0.75407 60/60F
56.15 Degrees API
0.75333 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.7 Degrees F
132.6 Degrees F
221.7 Degrees F
332.1 Degrees F
416.3 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.7 mL
1.5mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1 /24/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1 /05
2/2/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1 /25/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
"**** NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13624 page 2of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13625
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13625 Comments;
995STJ(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
. D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/19/05.
lOod 35; #151; 8/13/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
166 Parts Per Million
6.53 PS I
39.1 Volume Percent
80.2 Volume Percent
29.37 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.30 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.11 Volumn Percent
29.5 Volume Percent
1.26 Volume Percent
0.7506 60/60F
57.02 Degrees API
0.74986 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.1 Degrees F
142.7 Degrees F
221.7 Degrees F
340.2 Degrees F
444.9 Degrees F
1 mL
97.8 mL
1.2mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
FueL 41
Code:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM '
MM
MM-
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14-Mor-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13625 page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent ' TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 ' 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14'Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13626
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13626 Comments:
SKH303(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl 319
. 63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
1/19/05.
11 of 35; 82; 7-30-04
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.20 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
107 Parts Per Million
6.89 PS 1
39 Volume Percent
79.3 Volume Percent
36.45 Volume Percent
8 Volume Percent
2.17 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.20 Weight Percent
0.54 Volume Percent
0.54 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
8.84 Volumn Percent
36 Volume Percent
2.13 Volume Percent
0.76213 60/60F
54.16 Degrees API
0.76138 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.9 Degrees F
141.3 Degrees F
223.3 Degrees F
339.1 Degrees F
421 .9 Degrees F
0.9 mL
97.7 mL
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
. TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
]4-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13626 p°oe 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
l4Mf05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13627
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13627 Comments:
SJU224(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
1/19/05.
12 of 35; 189; 8-20-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
97 Parts Per Million
90 Parts Per Million
6.7 PS I
39.4 Volume Percent
79.9 Volume Percent
33.18 Volume Percent
8.7 Volume Percent
1.58 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
33.9 Volume Percent
1.55 Volume Percent
7.39 Volumn Percent
0.7576 60/60F
0.75761 60/60F
55.27 Degrees API
55.27 Degrees API
0.75685 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75686 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.5 Degrees F
142.2 Degrees F
223 Degrees F
337.6 Degrees F
425.5 Degrees F
0.9 mL
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/3/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
-------
U-Mar-05
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol byD5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13627
97.5 ml
1.6 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
'+McfCS NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13628
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1
Kansas City Samples-
355FEM(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanoi
534 Ethanoi
572 TAME
572 TAME
/19/05.
FTAG: 13628 Comments: 16 of 35; (494); 12/14/04
Results Units
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oiefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanoi byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanoi byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
120 Parts Per Million
12.92 PS I
48.9 Volume Percent
84.7 Volume Percent
21.98 Volume Percent
10.2 Volume Percent
0,96 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.94 Volume Percent
5.56 Volumn Percent
22.4 Volume Percent
0.7286 60/60F
62.71 Degrees API
0.72788 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1 /24/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
-------
14-Mar-05
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13628
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE-
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
DiPE by D5599
isobutanol by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
82 Degrees F
106 Degrees F
202.6 Degrees F
326.1 Degrees F
420.3 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.6 mL
2.6 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
l4MfOS NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13629
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples-533 FTAG: 13629 Comments:
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
1/19/05.
17 of 35; 1-11-05
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
134 Parts Per Million
13.97 PSI
52.9 Volume Percent
84.8 Volume Percent
22.05 Volume Percent
9.9 Volume Percent
1 .04 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1 .01 Volume Percent
4.88 Volumn Percent
21 .4 Volume Percent
0.7251 2 60/60F
63.64 Degrees API
0.7244 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
78.4 Degrees F
95 Degrees F
192.7 Degrees F
326.5 Degrees F
421 .2 Degrees F
0.4 mL
96.3 mL
3.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/23/05
1/24/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
I4Mr* NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13629 Page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 • 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14'Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13630
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13630 Comments
GRSWSH(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oleflnsln byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanoi by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/19/05.
: 18 of 35; #452; 12/1/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
93 Parts Per Million
12.36 PS I
49.7 Volume Percent
85.2 Volume Percent
24.07 Volume Percent
10.1 Volume Percent
1.20 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
5.8 Volumn Percent
23.3 Volume Percent
0.72967 60/60F
62.42 Degrees API
0.72895 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.6 Degrees F
107.1 Degrees F
200.7 Degrees F
320.5 Degrees F
404.8 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.7 mL
2.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season: Winter
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST '
NST
MM
MM.
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
' 3/10/05
1/24/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14-Mar'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13630 page2of2
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
I4Mf05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13631
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/19/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13631 Comments: 19 of 35; (471); 12/8/04
QMHSOl(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
116 Parts Per Million
11.98 PS I
48.6 Volume Percent
85.3 Volume Percent
25.24 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.26 Volume Percent
6.17 Volumn Percent
24.8 Volume Percent
0.73324 60/60F
61.48 Degrees API
0.73251 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84 Degrees F
110.8 Degrees F
203.4 Degrees F
318.7 Degrees F
404.2 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.1 mL
2.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
FueL 41
Code:
voc
Season:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
• TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
3/10/05
1/24/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/T/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13631
585 t-Butanol byD5599
586 n-Propanol byD5599
587 sec-Butanol byD5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599
5802 n-Butanol byD5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13632
U.S.
Page 1 of 1
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13632 Comments:
QBL236(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanoi by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 D1PE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
1/19/05.
23 of 35; #132; 8/7/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
11.47 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
79 Parts Per Million
8.17 PS I
19.77 Volume Percent
6.9 Volume Percent
0.80 Volume Percent
0.80 Volume Percent
31.49 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
31.49 Volume Percent
11.47 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
19.1 Volume Percent
0.82 Volume Percent
4.7 Volumn Percent
0.75739 60/60F
55.33 Degrees API
0.75664 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
TW
NST
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Analysis
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
3/10/05
1/24/05
2/1/05
2/3/05
2/17/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/3/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14'Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13633
U.S.
Page \ of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13633 Comments:
941F4W
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME . by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
1/19/05.
24 of 35; 432; 9-29-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
83 Parts Per Million
8.21 PS I
43.9 Volume Percent
79.2 Volume Percent
29.97 Volume Percent
9.3 Volume Percent
0.97 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.45 Volumn Percent
0.94 Volume Percent
30.4 Volume Percent
0.74905 60/60F
0.7491 60/60F
57.41 Degrees API
57.39 Degrees API
0.74836 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74831 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
95.2 Degrees F
129 Degrees F
216.9 Degrees F
342.9 Degrees F
425.8 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.3 mL
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW'
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM •
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
3/10/05
1/24/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/1/05
2/8/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/8/05
1 /25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
1/25/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
-------
J4-Mor-05
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13633
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
1.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/4/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13634
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13634 Comments:
QPJ860KS
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 .
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/19/05.
25 of 35; 439; 9-30-?
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
130 Parts Per Million
8.43 PS I
44.1 Volume Percent
78.4 Volume Percent
32.3 Volume Percent
9.1 Volume Percent
0.92 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.87 Volumn Percent
32.3 Volume Percent
0.89 Volume Percent
0.75067 60/60F
57 Degrees API
0.74992 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
92.2 Degrees F
122.8 Degrees F
220.7 Degrees F
341.3 Degrees F
428.7 Degrees F
0.7 ml_
97.3 mL
2 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
.3/10/05
1/26/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/8/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/1/05
2/8/05
2/1/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13634 page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 D1PE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480 .
6636 Berger Avenue
13635
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13635 Comments:
008HJ4(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 '• Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/19/05.
26 of 35; (469); 12/7/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
106 Parts Per Million
10.89 PS I
48.2 Volume Percent
83.7 Volume Percent
25.99 Volume Percent
10 Volume Percent
1.27 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
26.6 Volume Percent
1.25 Volume Percent
6.01 Volumn Percent
0.73638 60/60F
60.66 Degrees API
0.73565 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
85.8 Degrees F
112.6 Degrees F
204.1 Degrees F
325.9 Degrees F
408.9 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.4 mL
1.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/8/05
2/17/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/8/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis RepOft 13635 Page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14-Mar'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13636
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/19/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13636 Comments: 34 of 35; 51; 7-24-04
064MRF(Mo)
voc
Season: Winter
Test Test. Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 .50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
215 Parts Per Million
6.5 PS I
37.3 Volume Percent
81.4 Volume Percent
34.72 Volume Percent
8.3 Volume Percent
1.88 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
34 Volume Percent
1.83 Volume Percent
8.08 Volumn Percent
0.75809 60/60F
55.15 Degrees API
0.75734 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
102.2 Degrees F
145 Degrees F
225.9 Degrees F
328.5 Degrees F
413.4 Degrees F
0.8 ml
97.7 ml
1.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
FueL 41
Code:
Analys
TS •
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05.
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/8/05
2/18/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05 '
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
2/8/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13636
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/14/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13649
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13649 Comments:
QLX676(KS)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees f D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/26/05.
Label ink is partially dissolved
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
159 Parts Per Million
7.35 PS I
39.3 Volume Percent
80.9 Volume Percent
32.59 Volume Percent
8.4 Volume Percent
1.65 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
32 Volume Percent
1.6 Volume Percent
7.29 Volumn Percent
0.75409 60/60F
56.14 Degrees API
0.75334 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.6 Degrees f
138.4 Degrees F
223.2 Degrees F
330.8 Degrees F
414.1 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.6 mL
1.6 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:. Winter
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/9/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/9/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
U-Mar-05
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol byD5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
Ana|ySjS Report
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
13649
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar'06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13650
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13650 Comments:
USX537(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562" ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/26/05.
Overpack damp; Label damp but readable
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
284 Parts Per Million
13.69 PS I
51.4 Volume Percent
85.3 Volume Percent
22.65 Volume Percent
9.9 Volume Percent
1.08 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.1 Volume Percent
1.04 Volume Percent
5.02 Volumn Percent
0.72684 60/60F
63.18 Degrees API
0.72612 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
79.2 Degrees F
lOODegreesF
196.7 Degrees F
320.7 Degrees F
410.5 Degrees F
0.4 mL
96.4 mL
3.2 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
udable; gasoline smell
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/2/05
2/9/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/9/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1 /27/05
1 /27/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/1/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13650 page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13651
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/26/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13651 Comments:
QHK162(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.21 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
316 Parts Per Million
314 Parts Per Million
13.98 PS 1
49.9 Volume Percent
85.5 Volume Percent
23.5 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1 .24 Volume Percent
0.21 Weight Percent
0.55 Volume Percent
0.55 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.52 Volumn Percent
1 .21 Volume Percent
23.9 Volume Percent
0.72997 60/60F
62.34 Degrees API
0.72925 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.1 Degrees F
99.3 Degrees F
200.3 Degrees F
319.1 Degrees F
395.8 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.1 mL
3.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/15/05
-------
U-Mar-05
584 Isopropanol byD5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol byD5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanoi byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
Ana|ySJS Report
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
13651
K*e 2 of 2
TS
TS
TS.
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Bateh#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13652
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13652 Comments:
VQH119(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
VOC
1/26/05. . Season: Winter
Sample leaked to the extent that label was obliterated
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
73 Parts Per Million
6.09 PS I
37.1 Volume Percent
73.7 Volume Percent
36.44 Volume Percent
10.4 Volume Percent
1.64 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
36.7 Volume Percent
1.6 Volume Percent
8.33 Volumn Percent
0.76526 60/60F
53.41 Degrees API
0.7645 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.8 Degrees F
144.7 Degrees F
230.9 Degrees F
355.1 Degrees F
427.1 Degrees F
0.7 mL
97.9 mL
1.4mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
, TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/10/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13652 ^ 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
-------
14'Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13653
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13653
QBX511(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
voc
1/26/05. Season: Winter
Comments: Sample leaked to the extent that label was partially obliterated
Results Units
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
138
6.12
37.2
80.9
35.45
7.9
8.3
1.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.93
35.8
36
1.71
0.75994
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
NST
TW
MM
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
2/14/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
-------
14-Mar-05
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13653
692
691
101
110
150
190
, 200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent D86
50 Percent D86
90 Percent D86
End Point D86
Residue D86
Total Recovery D86
Loss D86
Methanol by D5599
Methanol by D5599
Isopropanol by D5599
Isopropanol by D5599
t-Butanol byD5599
t-Butanol by D5599
n-Propanoi by D5599
n-Propanol by D5599
sec-Butanol by D5599
sec-Butanol by D5599
DIPE by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol byD5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
54.7
0.75919
104.2
145.2
227.1
331.7
419.4
0.8
97.8
1.4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
mL
mL
mL
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
l4-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13654
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13654 Comments:
STJIM2(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME. byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4Q52
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
1/26/05. Season: Winter
Sample leaked to the extent that label was obliterated
Results Units
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
•203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent.
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
23 Parts Per Million
5.89 PS I
27.7 Volume Percent
85.7 Volume Percent
29.55 Volume Percent
2.4 Volume Percent
1.77 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
28 Volume Percent
9.31 Volumn Percent
1.74 Volume Percent
0.74957 60/60F
57.28 Degrees API
0.74883 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
103.1 Degrees F
160.5 Degrees F
228.2 Degrees F
318.4 Degrees F
399.2 Degrees F
0.9 mL
97.5 mL
1.6 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM .
TS
TS
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/10/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13654
585 t-Butano! by D5599
586 n-Propanol byD5599
587 sec-Butanol byD5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13655
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13655 Comments:
105TRX(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE . by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319 .
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss ' D86
1/26/05.
Overpack and label tag damp; Gasoline smell
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
112 Parts Per Million
6.31 PS I
38.1 Volume Percent
81.2 Volume Percent
30.86 Volume Percent
9.8 Volume Percent
10.4 Volume Percent
1.13 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
31.9 Volume Percent
1.09 Volume Percent
30.9 Volume Percent
8.38 Volumn Percent
0.7542 60/60F
56.12 Degrees API
0.75345 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100 Degrees F
142.2 Degrees F
223.7 Degrees F
338 Degrees F
424.4 Degrees F
0.8 ml_
97.7 ml_
VOC
Season: Winter
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/1 5/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
2/10/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/14/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
'2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
2/4/05
-------
l4-Mar-05
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
589 Isobutanol byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13655
Page 2 of 2
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent.
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13656
U.S.
Page 1 of 1
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13656 Comments:
STJIM3(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
543 Methanol by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutano!
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
1/26/05.
Overpack damp with gasoline;
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
38 Parts Per Million
10.72 PS I
10.7 PS I
32.2 Volume Percent
3.7 Volume Percent
0.72 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.69 Volume Percent
5.99 Volumn Percent
33 Volume Percent
0.74849 60/60F
57.55 Degrees API
0.74775 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent.
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
gas smell; tape glue dissolved
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
1/26/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/10/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13657
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13657 Comments:
ERGID-108
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur In Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57. TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
VOC
1/26/05. Season: Winter
Sample leaked to the point that label was obliterated; Sample identity u
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
159 Parts Per Million
6.43 PS I
38.3 Volume Percent
80.4 Volume Percent
30.2 Volume Percent
10.3 Volume Percent
1.42 Volume Percent
1.43 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.39 Volume Percent
6.36 Volumn Percent
30.2 Volume Percent
0.75243 60/60F
56.56 Degrees API
0.75169 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.1 Degrees F
146.1 Degrees F
222.8 Degrees F
337.1 Degrees F
441.7 Degrees F
0.7 ml
97.8 ml
1.5 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
1/27/05
1 /27/05
1/27/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mor-05
584 Isopropanol byD5599
585 t-Butanol byD5599
586 n-Propanol byD5599
587 sec-Butanol byD5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol byD5599
Ana|ySjS Report
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
13657
2 of 2
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13658
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on "
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13658 Comments:
FB48MW
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
101 initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent
D86
6/05.
Gasoline smell in container
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
106 Parts Per Million
6.19 PS 1
38.2 Volume Percent
38.1 Volume Percent
77.9 Volume Percent
78 Volume Percent
32.36 Volume Percent
1 0 Volume Percent
1 .40 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
32.7 Volume Percent
1 .37 Volume Percent
7.72 Volumn Percent
0.75729 60/60F
0.75731 60/60F
55.35 Degrees API
55.35 Degrees API
0.75654 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75656 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
1 04.9 Degrees F
99.5 Degrees F
146.3 Degrees F
145.9 Degrees F
225 Degrees F
VOC
Season:
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/26/05
2/8/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/2/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/14/05
2/2/05
2/2/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
1/27/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
-------
14-Mar-05
150
190
190
200
200
201
201
202
/202
203
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
50 Percent
90 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
End Point
Residue
Residue
Total Recovery
Total Recovery
Loss
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DiPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
224.6 Degrees F
347.4 Degrees F
347 Degrees F
455.4 Degrees F
446 Degrees F
0.9 mL
0.8 mL
97.6 mL
97.7 mL
1.5 ml
1.5 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
13658
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/9/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13659
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/26/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13659 Comments:
550BX2
Test Test. Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol- byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
' 101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol by
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
V05.
Dverpack damp with gasoline; label dam
Results Units Fuel_ 41
Code:
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
1 74 Parts Per Million
6.89 PS 1
38.7 Volume Percent
81.1 Volume Percent
34.47 Volume Percent
8 Volume Percent
1 .89 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
33.9 Volume Percent
7.89 Volumn Percent
1 ,84 Volume Percent
0.75657 60/60F
55.53 Degrees API
0.75582 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.2 Degrees F
141.8 Degrees F
223.9 Degrees F
329.7 Degrees F
422.8 Degrees F
0.7 mL
97.9 mL
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/27/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/14/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13659 woe 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13660
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1/26/05.
VOC
Season: Winter
Kansas City Samples-
QEB986(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
FTAG: 13660 Comments: Gasoline smell in container
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
178 Parts Per Million
11.43 PS I
52.7 Volume Percent
85.6 Volume Percent
23.27 Volume Percent
7.4 Volume Percent
0.91 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.89 Volume Percent
22.6 Volume Percent
5.43 Volumn Percent
0.7263 60/60F
63.32 Degrees API
0.72559 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319 .-
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE . by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
. TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/27/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/8/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
-------
U-Mar-05
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
86 Degrees F
111,4 Degrees F
192.6 Degrees F
320.7 Degrees F
419.7 Degrees F
0.7 ml
97.3 ml
2 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
13660
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS .
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13661
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13661 Comments:
154FFB(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/26/05.
Gasoline smell, overpack damp
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
67 Parts Per Million
6.53 PS I
40.2 Volume Percent
79.6 Volume Percent
30.79 Volume Percent
10.7 Volume Percent
1.10 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.07 Volume Percent
7.32 Volumn Percent
32.2 Volume Percent
0.75388 60/60F
56.2 Degrees API
0.75313 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
103.1 Degrees F
141.3 Degrees F
221.9 Degrees F
342.3 Degrees F
435 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.5 mL
1.7 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
ink on label partially dissolved
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
3/10/05
1/27/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/15/05
2/15/05
-------
u-Mar-05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13661 page 2of 2
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/15/05
-------
14-Mar-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13662
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13662 Comments:
217RBT(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oiefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/26/05.
Gasoline smell; overpack damp;
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
153 Parts Per Million
8.12 PS I
45.1 Volume Percent
82.2 Volume Percent
27.34 Volume Percent
9.4 Volume Percent
1.07 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.05 Volume Percent
5.78 Volumn Percent
28 Volume Percent
0.74211 60/60F
59.17 Degrees API
0.74138 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
96.6 Degrees F
129.2 Degrees F
212.2 Degrees F
329.2 Degrees F
426.4 Degrees F
0.8 mL
98.1 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season: Winter
tape glue dissolved; label damp but rea
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis I
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
3/10/05
1/27/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
-------
14-Mar-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13662 Paae 2of 2
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/16/05
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/16/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/16/05
588 DIPE byD5599 ' 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/16/05
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/16/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent • TS 2/16/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/16/05
-------
14-Mar-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13663
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on '
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13663 Comments:
QKU162(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
/05.
Gasoline smell; overpack damp;
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
115 Parts Per Million
115 Parts Per Million
6.64 PS 1
39 Volume Percent
78.8 Volume Percent
30.39 Volume Percent
7.6 Volume Percent
1 .24 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1 .22 Volume Percent
5.92 Volumn Percent
29.8 Volume Percent
0.74997 60/60F
57. 18 Degrees API
0.74922 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
102.2 Degrees F
1 39.6 Degrees F
223.7 Degrees F
343 Degrees F
412.2 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.9 mL
1.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
tape glue dissolved
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
3/10/05
3/10/05
1/27/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/18/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/8/05
2/8/05
2/14/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/3/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/9/05
2/16/05
-------
J4-Mar-05
584 Isopropanol byD5599
585 t-Butanol byD5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13663
Page 2 of 2
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
2/16/05
-------
26-Sep'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13716
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13716 Comments:
206JKL(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oleflnsln by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl 319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
5/05.
520; 1-29-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
208 Parts Per Million
14.39 PSI
14.39 PS 1
50.9 Volume Percent
84.4 Volume Percent
21 .46 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
0.97 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.96 Volume Percent
21 Volume Percent
4.86 Volumn Percent
0.72547 60/60F
63.55 Degrees API
0.72475 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.8 Degrees F
99.7 Degrees F
197.6 Degrees F
324.1 Degrees F
423.5 Degrees F
0.5 mL
96.9 mL
2.6 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season:
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
3/31/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/4/05
6/6/05
3/2/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
3/4/05
6/6/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
2/28/05
-------
26'Sep'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13716 page2of 2
584 Isopropanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
-------
26'sep~05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13717
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13717 Comments
665PS4(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 - Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
2/23/05.
: #466:12/6/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
110 Parts Per Million
100 Parts Per Million
10.92 PS I
36.3 Volume Percent
86.2 Volume Percent
30.02 Volume Percent
3.7 Volume Percent
0.85 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.83 Volume Percent
29.3 Volume Percent
10.89 Volumn Percent
0.74339 60/60F
58.84 Degrees API
0.74266 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84.6 Degrees F
119.1 Degrees F
224.6 Degrees F
317.7 Degrees F
413.1 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.9 ml
2.3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys Analysis Date
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
3/31/05
3/31/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/4/05
6/6/05
3/2/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
3/4/05
6/6/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
2/28/05
-------
26^ep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13717
584 Isopropanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13718
U.S.
Page \ of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13718 Comments:
QPX590
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
5/05.
[504); 12/16/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
135 Parts Per Million
12.26 PS 1
47.4 Volume Percent
77.7 Volume Percent
30.75 Volume Percent
9.6 Volume Percent
0.88 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
29.9 Volume Percent
0.87 Volume Percent
5.66 Volumn Percent
0.74529 60/60F
58.36 Degrees API
0.74455 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84.4 Degrees F
1 08.3 Degrees F
209.5 Degrees F
344.8 Degrees F
427.1 Degrees F
0.6 ml
97.5 mL
1.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
3/31/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/4/05
6/6/05
3/2/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
6/6/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
2/28/05
2/28/05
-------
*"*"* NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13718
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
586 n-Propanoi by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
588 DIPE by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
5802 n-S3utanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 2/28/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13719
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13719 Comments:
863JKM(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
3/05.
615; 1-28-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
144 Parts Per Million
13.21 PSI
47.1 Volume Percent
86.1 Volume Percent
24.31 Volume Percent
6.1 Volume Percent
0.79 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.5 Volume Percent
0.78 Volume Percent
6.69 Volumn Percent
0.7288 60/60F
62.66 Degrees API
0.72807 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.6 Degrees F
102.7 Degrees F
208.4 Degrees F
320.7 Degrees F
416.5 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.9 ml
2.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
VOC
Season:
Fuel 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/4/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/8/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/1/05
3/1 /05
-------
26'Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13719 Page2of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
26'sep'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
13720
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Kansas City Samples-
952NS5(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
VOC
Season:
Winter
FTAG: 13720 Comments: 685; 2-14-05 cap broken, transferred to a new sample bottle
by D5599
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
258 Parts Per Million
13.62 PS I
50.4 Volume Percent
85.1 Volume Percent
22.6 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.8 Volume Percent
1.16 Volume Percent
5.27 Volumn Percent
0.7276 60/60F
62.97 Degrees API
0.72689 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/4/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/8/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
-------
26-Sep-05
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13720
101
no
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
79.3 Degrees F
101.3 Degrees F
199 Degrees F
319.5 Degrees F
402,4 Degrees F
0.7 mL
96.4 ml
2.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13721
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13721 Comments: 575; 1-20-05
43H6(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oleflnsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
331 Parts Per Million
328 Parts Per Million
14.14 PS I
51.6 Volume Percent
86 Volume Percent
22.58 Volume Percent
8.8 Volume Percent
1.41 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.41 Volume Percent
22.4 Volume Percent
5.36 Volumn Percent
0.72821 60/60F
62.81 Degrees API
0,72749 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81,5 Degrees F
100 Degrees F
196.3 Degrees F
320.4 Degrees F
399 Degrees F
0.9 mL
96.7 mL
2.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Winter
Analysis I
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/18/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/4/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/4/05
6/8/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/1/05
-------
26~sep~05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13721 Page2of 2
584 Isopropanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
***** NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged In by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13722 Comments: 634; 2-2-05
430ALN(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
13722
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
214 Parts Per Million
14.45 PS I
50.5 Volume Percent
84.6 Volume Percent
22.86 Volume Percent
9.2 Volume Percent
1.21 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.5 Volume Percent
1.19 Volume Percent
5.2 Volumn Percent
0.72763 60/60F
62.97 Degrees API
0.72691 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
79 Degrees F
97.7 Degrees F
198.3 Degrees F
323.2 Degrees F
406.8 Degrees F
0.7 ml
96.3 ml
3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis I
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/4/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/8/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/3/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26~Sep~05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13722 p°ge 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13723
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13723 Comments
VEX191(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
2/23/05.
: 622; 1-31-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
153 Parts Per Million
14.47 PS I
14.47 PS I
50.7 Volume Percent
84 Volume Percent
10.5 Volume Percent
0.89 Volume Percent
0.90 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.8 Volume Percent
0.72636 60/60F
0.72622 60/60F
63.35 Degrees API
63.31 Degrees API
0.7255 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72564 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
79.9 Degrees F
99.3 Degrees F
198 Degrees F
327.9 Degrees F
426.7 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.8 ml
2.4 mL
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1 /05
6/8/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
-------
26-Sep-05
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13723
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13724
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13724 Comments: 579; 1-21-05
TCA013(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME byD5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FlA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
VOC
Season: Winter
691
101
110
150
190
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
129 Parts Per Million
14.53 PS I
50.5 Volume Percent
84.4 Volume Percent
10 Volume Percent
0.89 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
20.5 Volume Percent
0.72433 60/60F
63.85 Degrees API
0.72361 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
78.1 Degrees F
97.2 Degrees F
198.7 Degrees F
328.3 Degrees F
433.2 Degrees F
0.5 mL
97 mL
2.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Analysis Date
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/8/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26~Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13724 p°ge 2of 2
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13725
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13725 Comments: 568:1-19-05
298MSB(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
VOC
Season: Winter
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
103 Parts Per Million
12.82 PS i
44.3 Volume Percent
85.7 Volume Percent
5.3 Volume Percent
0.87 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
24.5 Volume Percent
0.73125 60/60F
62.01 Degrees API
0.73052 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.4 Degrees F
105.3 Degrees F
214.7 Degrees F
320.5 Degrees F
409.5 Degrees F
0.8 ml
96.9 ml
2.3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Analysis Date
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/8/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26~Sep~06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13725 page 2 of 2
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13726
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13726 Comments: 83; 7-30-04
480EAA(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsln byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
VOC
Season: Winter
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
43 Parts Per Million
6.95 PS I
30.8 Volume Percent
85.3 Volume Percent
2.3 Volume Percent
1.61 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
27.9 Volume Percent
0.7468 60/60F
57.97 Degrees API
0.74607 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.4 Degrees F
150.8 Degrees F
227.3 Degrees F
322.2 Degrees F
406.2 Degrees F
0.9 mL
98 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Analysis Date
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
6/8/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/8/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26-sep-os NVFEL Fue! Ana|ysiS Report 13726
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13727
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13727 Comments: #123; 8/7/04
QPW234(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur In Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene In Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691
101
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
313 Parts Per Million
8.57 PS I
44.1 Volume Percent
82.5 Volume Percent
10 Volume Percent
0.94 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.2 Volume Percent
0.73475 60/60F
61.08 Degrees API
0.73402 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
93.9 Degrees F
130.5 Degrees F
212.7 Degrees F
333.7 Degrees F
411.3 Degrees F
0.9 mL
97.6 mL
1.5mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
6/9/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/9/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26~Sep'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13727 page2of 2
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13728
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13728 Comments: (5); License #; 7/13/04
254EZ8
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
70 Parts Per Million
6.77 PS I
38.8 Volume Percent
79 Volume Percent
11.4 Volume Percent
12.8 Volume Percent
0.95 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
29.2 Volume Percent
29.7 Volume Percent
0.75182 60/60F
56.71 Degrees API
0.75108 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.5 DegreesF
141.4 DegreesF
225.3 Degrees F
347.7 Degrees F
427.8 Degrees F
0.9 mL
97.8 mL
1.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
6/9/05
6/9/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/9/05
6/9/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13728 *** 2of 2
586 n-Propanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/1/05
-------
26~Sep~05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13729 Comments: 306; 9/10/03
TBG337(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
13729
Page 1 of 2
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
154 Parts Per Million
6.77 PS I
38.3 Volume Percent
80.7 Volume Percent
35.1 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.81 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
35.2 Volume Percent
8.06 Volumn Percent
1.81 Volume Percent
0.76097 60/60F
0.76093 60/60F
54.45 Degrees API
54.46 Degrees API
0.76021 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.76018 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.3 Degrees F
144.1 Degrees F
226.4 Degrees F
329.5 Degrees F
414.7 Degrees F
0.8 mL
98.2 mL
U.S.
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/4/05
6/9/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
6/9/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
-------
26-Sep-05
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13729
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
3/8/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26~sep'05 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13730
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples-109 FTAG: 13730 Comments
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
2/24/05.
: 8/5/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
117 Parts Per Million
6.38 PS I
36.6 Volume Percent
80.9 Volume Percent
30.08 Volume Percent
8.6 Volume Percent
1.46 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.45 Volume Percent
6.61 Volumn Percent
30 Volume Percent
0.75363 60/60F
0.75364 60/60F
56.26 Degrees API
U.S.
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys Analysis Date
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/4/05
6/9/05
3/2/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
6/9/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
-------
26-Sep-05
692
691
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
56.26 Degrees API
0.75288 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75289 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
103.5 Degrees F
148.3 Degrees F
224.8 Degrees F
334.9 Degrees F
432 Degrees F
0.9 ml
98.2 ml
0.9 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
13730
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/8/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
3/1/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13731
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/24/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13731 Comments: 8-4-04
765RBW(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
146
6.47
38.5
81
31.7
8.6
1.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.95
1.58
31.8
0.75518
55.87
0.75444
101.7
144.9
222.1
332.1
426.4
0.9
98.1
1
0.00
0.00
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
mL
mL
ml_
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/4/05
6/9/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
6/9/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
26~Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13731 page 2 of 2
585 t-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
-------
26-Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner; EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13732
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/24/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13732 Comments: 153; 8/13/04
820WSN(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
133 Parts Per Million
6.93 PS I
38.9 Volume Percent
80.5 Volume Percent
33.96 Volume Percent
8.2 Volume Percent
8.4 Volume Percent
1.86 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
35.4 Volume Percent
7.61 Volumn Percent
1.84 Volume Percent
35.2 Volume Percent
0.75836 60/60F
55.09 Degrees API
0.75761 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.8 Degrees F
141.8 Degrees F
224.1 Degrees F
335.8 Degrees F
422.8 Degrees F
0.9 ml
98.1 ml
1 ml
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/4/05
6/20/05
6/20/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
6/20/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
6/20/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
-------
26-Sep-05
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13732
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13733
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/24/05.
Kansas City Samples-775- FTAG: 13733 Comments: 33; 7-21-04
voc
Season: Winter
XFJ
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.14 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
106 Parts Per Million
6.66 PS I
38.3 Volume Percent
79.5 Volume Percent
29.98 Volume Percent
9.4 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.44 Volume Percent
1.44 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.14 Weight Percent
0.39 Volume Percent
0.39 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
31.1 Volume Percent
6.41 Volumn Percent
1.45 Volume Percent
31 Volume Percent
0.75543 60/60F
55.81 Degrees API
0.75469 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
102.4 Degrees F
141.3 Degrees F
225.3 Degrees F
339.8 Degrees F
437.5 Degrees F
0.8ml
97.8 ml
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
NST
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/4/05
6/20/05
6/20/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
6/20/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
6/20/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
-------
26-Sep-05
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13733
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
3/9/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13734
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/24/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13734 Comments: #384; 9-24-04
387FFR(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
134 Parts Per Million
8.24 PS I
41.8 Volume Percent
81.6 Volume Percent
30.45 Volume Percent
8 Volume Percent
1.50 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.79 Volumn Percent
1.52 Volume Percent
30.5 Volume Percent
0.75047 60/60F
57.05 Degrees API
0.74973 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
96.1 Degrees F
134.1 Degrees F
218.8 Degrees F
331.2 Degrees F
415.8 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.9 mL
1.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
4/18/05
2/24/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/4/05
6/20/05
3/3/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/4/05
3/4/05
6/20/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol byD5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13734
p^ 2 of 2
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
26'Sep-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13736
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/24/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13736 Comments: 670; 2-9-05
SKN097(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
255 Parts Per Million
14.33 PS I
14.33 PS I
52.5 Volume Percent
85.5 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1.26 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.4 Volume Percent
0.72656 60/60F
63.25 Degrees API
0.72584 g/cm-03 © 60 deg F
80.4 Degrees F
96.3 Degrees F
192.6 Degrees F
319.1 Degrees F
401.2 Degrees F
0.9 ml
96.9 ml
2.2 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
Analysis
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
6/20/05
3/3/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
6/20/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
***** NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13736 Page2of2
587 sec-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
588 DIPE by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
-------
26-sep-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13738
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Results Units
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/24/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13738 Comments: #419; 9-27-04
VEP260(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Oleflnsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
VOC
Season: Winter
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
41 Parts Per Million
8.22 PS I
32.9 Volume Percent
85.8 Volume Percent
2.1 Volume Percent
1.41 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
26.3 Volume Percent
0.74159 60/60F
59.31 Degrees API
0.74086 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
93.2 Degrees F
138.6 DegreesF
226.2 Degrees F
317.5 DegreesF
405.9 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.5 mL
1.7 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41
Code:
Xnalys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Analysis Date
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
6/20/05
3/3/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
6/20/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
« i -- 2 of 2
26-sep-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
. nKKOO 0.00 Volume Percent TS 3/2/05
588 DIPE byD5599 u'
589 isobutano, byD5599 0,00 Volume Percent 3
580! t-AmylAlcoho, byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent
5802 n-Butono, byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent
-------
26-sep-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
, Batch*
Kansas City Samples
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13739
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 2/24/05.
A _!.-.. ZTO« fi
voc
Season: Winter
Kansas City Samples
QAS380(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
FTAG: 13739
Comments:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191(Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
679;02-11-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
346 Parts Per Million
13.81 PS I
13.79 PS I
51.5 Volume Percent
85.7 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.25 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.7 Volume Percent
0.72681 60/60F
0.72673 60/60F
63.21 Degrees API
63.19 Degrees API
0.72609 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
FueL 41
Code:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Da
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
4/5/05
2/24/05
2/24/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
6/20/05
3/3/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
6/20/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
2/25/05
-------
26-Sep-05
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13739
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE
by D5599
589 Isobutanol
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.72602 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.7 Degrees F
102.2 Degrees F
196.3 Degrees F
318.2 Degrees F
403.2 Degrees F
0.7 ml
96.8 ml
2.5 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
2/25/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/9/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
3/2/05
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/8/2005.
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13822 Comments: 591; 1-24-05
608CNC(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
13822
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
246 Parts Per Million
13.4 PS I
13.42 PS1
47.2 Volume Percent
85 Volume Percent
24.72 Volume Percent
7.7 Volume Percent
0.96 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.1 Volumn Percent
0.95 Volume Percent
23.2 Volume Percent
0.73048 60/60F
62.21 Degrees API
0.72976 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
83.1 Degrees F
104.4 Degrees F
207.3 Degrees F
322.3 Degrees F
403 Degrees F
0.8 ml
97.3 ml
1.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/11/2005
4/1 1/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/27/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
7/27/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-05
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-ButanoI
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13822
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13823
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13823 Comments:
UZ0777tKs)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol byD5599
1/2005.
173; 8-17-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
170 Parts Per Million
6.27 PS I
36.8 Volume Percent
78.7 Volume Percent
32.4 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1.63 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
33.1 Volume Percent
7.44 Volumn Percent
1.59 Volume Percent
0.75846 60/60F
55.06 Degrees API
0.75771 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.8 Degrees F
146.5 Degrees F
226.2 Degrees F
341.8 Degrees F
432.7 Degrees F
0.8 mL
98 mL
1.2 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/11/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/27/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/27/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13823 •** 2 of 2
585 t-ButanoI by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
588 D1PE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
5802 n-Butanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
-------
°2'Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13824 Comments:
409PM5(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
13824
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol byD5599
1/2005.
169; 8-17-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
166 Parts Per Million
6.56 PS I
38 Volume Percent
80.5 Volume Percent
28.81 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1.27 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
29.5 Volume Percent
6.01 Volumn Percent
1.25 Volume Percent
0.75261 60/60F
56.51 Degrees API
0.75187 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.7 Degrees F
143.3 Degrees F
224.6 Degrees F
340.1 Degrees F
452.6 Degrees F
0.8 ml
97.7 mL
1.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/11/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/27/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/27/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13824
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
>l by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13825 Comments:
SKZ544(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
13825
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/2005.
#367; 9-22-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
141 Parts Per Million
7.34 PS I
42.1 Volume Percent
78.8 Volume Percent
31.58 Volume Percent
9.4 Volume Percent
1.15 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
32.2 Volume Percent
6.85 Volumn Percent
1.14 Volume Percent
0.75431 60/60F
56.09 Degrees API
0.75357 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.2 Degrees F
132.3 Degrees F
221 Degrees F
341.2 Degrees F
432.7 Degrees F
0.8 mL
98.2 mL
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/11/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/27/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/27/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-05
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13825
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13826 Comments:
169KT4(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
13826
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol byD5599
1/2005.
#2; 8/9/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
1 79 Parts Per Million
6.54 PS I
37.1 Volume Percent
80.2 Volume Percent
32.74 Volume Percent
7.8 Volume Percent
1.61 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
34.3 Volume Percent
7.28 Volumn Percent
1.55 Volume Percent
0.75748 60/60F
55.3 Degrees API
0.75673 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
105.8 Degrees F
147.6 Degrees F
226.2 Degrees F
331.5 Degrees F
421.9 Degrees F
0.8 ml
98.2 ml
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/27/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/27/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13826
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13827
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1 1/2005.
Kansas City Samples-T]U404 FTAG: 13827 Comments: 605; 1-27-05
Results Units
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
1 50 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
309 Parts Per Million
310 Parts Per Million
13.26 PS I
49.6 Volume Percent
84.9 Volume Percent
22.89 Volume Percent
9.6 Volume Percent
1.16 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.8 Volume Percent
1.15 Volume Percent
5.3 Volumn Percent
0.72758 60/60F
62.98 Degrees API
0.72686 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.4 Degrees F
102.4 Degrees F
201 Degrees F
322.2 Degrees F
412.3 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.8 mL
2.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/28/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/28/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-05
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13827
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13828
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1 1/2005.
Kansas City SampIes-QLZ91 7 FTAG: 13828 Comments: 756; 2-28-05
Results Units
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
1 50 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
163 Parts Per Million
12.21 PS I
51.4 Volume Percent
83.8 Volume Percent
24.75 Volume Percent
10.5 Volume Percent
1.01 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
24.4 Volume Percent
5.52 Volumn Percent
0.99 Volume Percent
0.73229 60/60F
61.73 Degrees API
0.73156 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.9 Degrees F
103.7 Degrees F
195.8 Degrees F
328.2 Degrees F
406 Degrees F
0.8 ml
96.3 mL
2.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/28/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/28/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13828
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
)l by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13829
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13829 Comments:
099MSP(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol byD5599
1/2005.
675; 2-10-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
235 Parts Per Million
13.45 PS I
51.1 Volume Percent
84.3 Volume Percent
23.72 Volume Percent
10.7 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
24.1 Volume Percent
5.2 Volumn Percent
1.14 Volume Percent
0.72986 60/60F
62.37 Degrees API
0.72914 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.7 Degrees F
100.9 Degrees F
197.4 Degrees F
322.9 Degrees F
405.1 Degrees F
0.7 ml
96.9 ml
2.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/28/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/28/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13829
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
588 DIPE by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/9/2005
-------
1/2005.
569; 1-19-05
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13830 Comments:
QMI147(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
13830
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
101 Parts Per Million
14.1 PSI
14.1 PSI
52.6 Volume Percent
85.4 Volume Percent
23.61 Volume Percent
1 1 .4 Volume Percent
1 .2 1 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
25.6 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
5.53 Volumn Percent
0.72776 60/60F
62.93 Degrees API
Fuel 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/28/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/28/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13830
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
DIPE
Isobutanol
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
n-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.72704 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82 Degrees F
99.1 Degrees F
192.7 Degrees F
321.8 Degrees F
412.3 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.8 mL
2.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13831
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13831 Comments:
319ELX(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
1/2005.
VOC
Season: Winter
596; 1-25-05, cap broken, transferred to a new bottle
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
206 Parts Per Million
13.79 PS I
50.1 Volume Percent
84.3 Volume Percent
23.07 Volume Percent
9.4 Volume Percent
1.15 Volume Percent
1.14 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.7 Volume Percent
5.27 Volumn Percent
1.12 Volume Percent
0.72818 60/60F
0.7282 60/60F
62.81 Degrees API
62.82 Degrees API
0.72748 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72746 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
79.3 Degrees F
99.5 Degrees F
199.6 Degrees F
323.6 Degrees F
430.2 Degrees F
0.8 mL
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/28/2005
8/1/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/28/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13831
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
Isobutanol
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
by D5599
byD5599
96.6 ml
2.6 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13832
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
\ Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
J Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13832 Comments;
254M59(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME byD5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
5FtHTf CM 6 N
1/2005.
572; 1-20-05
Results Units
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
292 Parts Per Million
14.17 PS I
50.2 Volume Percent
85.4 Volume Percent
22.07 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.3 Volume Percent
5.17 Volumn Percent
1.16 Volume Percent
0.72569 60/60F
63.49 Degrees API
0.72497 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.4 Degrees F
95.7 Degrees F
199.4 Degrees F
321.1 Degrees F
406.4 Degrees F
0.6 mL
96.4 ml
3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
U.S.
voc
Season:
Fuel 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
10/27/2005
7/28/2005
8/1/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
7/28/2005
10/27/2005
10/27/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
4/22/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
02-Nov-05
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13832
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
5/9/2005
-------
1/2005.
594; 1 -25-05
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples-374XZC FTAG: 13834 Comments:
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefmsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
13834
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
1 30 Parts Per Million
13.29 PS 1
49.8 Volume Percent
83.9 Volume Percent
21.58 Volume Percent
1 0.8 Volume Percent
0.98 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.78 Volumn Percent
0.95 Volume Percent
2 1 .7 Volume Percent
0.72702 60/60F
63.13 Degrees API
0.7263 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.1 Degrees F
99.1 Degrees F
200.5 Degrees F
329.3 Degrees F
424.8 Degrees F
0.9 mL
96.6 mL
2.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Analysis Date
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
10/28/2005
7/29/2005
8/1/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/1 3/2005
10/28/2005
10/28/2005
7/29/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13834
Page 2 of 2
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue _
13835
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/11/2005.
N
-------
02-Nov-05
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-ButanoI
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13835
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/1 3/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13836
Page 1 of 2
t\
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/11/2005.
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13836 Comments: 626: 2/1/05; cap loose and bottle i
QLX676(Ks)
U.S.
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
350 Parts Per Million
13.53 PS I
50.8 Volume Percent
85.4 Volume Percent
22.68 Volume Percent
10.6 Volume Percent
1.12 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.21 Volumn Percent
1.1 Volume Percent
24 Volume Percent
0.72588 60/60F
63.43 Degrees API
0.72517 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.4 Degrees F
100 Degrees F
197.7 Degrees F
319.4 Degrees F
401 Degrees F
0.9 mL
96.8 ml
2.3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
p with gasoline
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
10/28/2005
7/29/2005
8/1/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
10/28/2005
10/28/2005
7/29/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
-------
°2'Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13836 ^ 2 or 2
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 4/13/2005
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 4/13/2005
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 4/13/2005
588 DIPE byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 4/13/2005
589 Isobutanol byD5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 4/13/2005
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 4/13/2005
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 4/13/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13838
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13838 Comments:
039SBR(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
11/2005.
;: 740; 2-24-05; cap loose, bottle and
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
273 Parts Per Million
13.13 PSI
49,4 Volume Percent
84.9 Volume Percent
22.15 Volume Percent
9.8 Volume Percent
1.1 1 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.24 Volumn Percent
1 .09 Volume Percent
2 1 .2 Volume Percent
0.72747 60/60F
63.01 Degrees API
0.72675 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
8 1 .3 Degrees F
103.3 Degrees F
201.6 Degrees F
321.1 Degrees F
410.9 Degrees F
0.9 ml
96.7 ml
2.4 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season: Winter
label damp with gasoline; styrofoam dissol
Fuel_ 41 Analyst Analysis Date
Code:
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
NST 9/7/2005
NST 4/12/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
TW 10/28/2005
MM 7/29/2005
TW 8/1/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TW 10/28/2005
TW 10/28/2005
MM 7/29/2005
MM 4/18/2005
MM 4/18/2005
MM 4/18/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
-------
°2'Nov-°5
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
1MVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13838
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
5^ I? I
« O 7 V6- I
1/2005.
317; 9-13-04; cap loose, bottle
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
98 Parts Per Million
6.4 PS I
36.9 Volume Percent
74.6 Volume Percent
37.68 Volume Percent
10.6 Volume Percent
2.31 Volume Percent
2.31 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
40.8 Volume Percent
2.27 Volume Percent
10.69 Volumn Percent
0.77083 60/60F
52.07 Degrees API
0.77007 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
104.5 Degrees F
144.1 Degrees F
230 Degrees F
349.9 Degrees F
420.1 Degrees F
0.8 mL
98.1 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
13841
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
f Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13841 Comments:
?JX693(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanoi byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
8C label damp with gasoline-label partially oblit
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Dat
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/24/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
10/5/2005
8/8/2005
8/29/2005
8/29/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/8/2005
10/5/2005
10/5/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-BuUnol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13841
Page 2 of 2
byD5599
by D5599
by D 5 599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
il by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13842
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13842 Comments:
950GMG(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME byD5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
1/2005.
voc
Season: Winter
321; 9-14-04; cap loose S bottle damp with gasoline
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
48 Parts Per Million
6.79 PS I
40.3 Volume Percent
78.1 Volume Percent
29.12 Volume Percent
11.7 Volume Percent
0.93 Volume Percent
0.93 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
30.3 Volume Percent
0.92 Volume Percent
6.17 Volumn Percent
0.75382 60/60F
56.21 Degrees API
0.75307 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
102.9 Degrees F
140.4 Degrees F
223.3 Degrees F
349.5 Degrees F
436.5 Degrees F
0.7 ml
98.2 ml
1.1 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Dat
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/24/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
10/6/2005
8/8/2005
8/29/2005
8/29/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/8/2005
10/6/2005
10/6/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-ButanoI
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13842
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13843
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/11/2005.
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13843 Comments: 757; 2-28-05; bottle S label damp with gasoline
52187(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
129 Parts Per Million
12.2 PS1
51 Volume Percent
82.7 Volume Percent
25.53 Volume Percent
10.3 Volume Percent
1.07 Volume Percent
1.07 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
25.9 Volume Percent
1.06 Volume Percent
5.37 Volumn Percent
0.73348 60/60F
61.42 Degrees API
0.73275 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
83.5 Degrees F
106.9 Degrees F
197.1 Degrees F
331.7 Degrees F
412.9 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.3 mL
1.9 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Dat
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/24/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
10/6/2005
8/8/2005
8/29/2005
8/29/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/8/2005
10/6/2005
10/6/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-ButanoI
588 D1PE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13843
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
>l by D5599
byD5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/14/2005
4/1 4/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
" , i
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13844
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13844 Comments:
VYC662(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME byD5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD519l (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
voc
1/2005. Season: Winter
872; 3-22-05; cap loose, gasoline between bottle S liner, bottle sc label damp
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
131 Parts Per Million
11.33 PS I
11.31 PS I
50.4 Volume Percent
83.2 Volume Percent
24.78 Volume Percent
24.66 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1.13 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
24.7 Volume Percent
1.11 Volume Percent
1.11 Volume Percent
5.39 Volumn Percent
5.36 Volumn Percent
0.7346 60/60F
61.12 Degrees API
0.73388 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
83.5 Degrees F
107.5 Degrees F
198.7 Degrees F
330 Degrees F
422.7 Degrees F
0.8 mL
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
9/7/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
10/28/2005
10/28/2005
8/9/2005
8/1/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/9/2005
10/28/2005
10/28/2005
10/28/2005
10/28/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13844
2 of 2
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
Isobutanol
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
byD5599
by D5599
96.6 mL
2.6 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13845
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13845 Comments;
TDZ932(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
U.S.
1/2005.
773; 3-3-05; bottle 6t label damp with gasoline
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
128 Parts Per Million
12.26 PS I
49.1 Volume Percent
83.4 Volume Percent
25.91 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.89 Volumn Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
2 5.6 Volume Percent
0.73567 60/60F
60.84 Degrees API
0.73494 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
86 Degrees F
112.1 Degrees F
202.6 Degrees F
328.3 Degrees F
41 1.4 Degrees F
0.8 mL
97.5 ml
1.7mL
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Dat
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
6/23/2005
4/12/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
10/4/2005
1 0/4/2005
8/9/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13845
Page 2 of 2
by 05599
by 05599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
fl (2L7L
13846
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/11/2005.
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13846 Comments: 917; 4-2-05; cap loose S label damp with gasoline,
552HPO
Results Units Fuel_ 41
Code:
voc
Season: Winter
neck chipped on bottle, tra
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
197 Parts Per Million
9.18 PS I
43.6 Volume Percent
82.8 Volume Percent
26.25 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6 Volumn Percent
1.28 Volume Percent
26.5 Volume Percent
0.7416 60/60F
59.3 Degrees API
0.74087 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
91 Degrees F
126.7 Degrees F
214 Degrees F
328.8 Degrees F
408 Degrees F
0.9 mL
97.7 mL
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
Analyst
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
6/23/2005
4/12/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
10/4/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13846
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13847
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/11/2005.
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13847 Comments: 910; 3-29-05; cazp loose 6C label damp with gasoline
SIL313(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
voc
Season: Winter
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
143 Parts Per Million
11.02 PS I
50 Volume Percent
83.6 Volume Percent
22.72 Volume Percent
11.7 Volume Percent
1.05 Volume Percent
1.05 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
23.9 Volume Percent
1.05 Volume Percent
5.21 Volumn Percent
0.73319 60/60F
61.49 Degrees API
Fuel 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
Analysis Dat
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/1 4/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/1 4/2005
4/1 4/2005
6/23/2005
4/12/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/9/2005
10/4/2005
10/4/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13847
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
DIPE
Isobutanol
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
n-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.73246 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
83.6 Degrees F
111.4 Degrees F
200 Degrees F
329.8 Degrees F
419 Degrees F
0.9 ml
96.8 ml
2.3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
4/18/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
U.S.
1/2005.
776; 3-4-05; bottle SE label damp with gasoline
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13848 Comments:
813NSI(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
13848
Page 1 of 2
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
121 Parts Per Million
1 1.56 PS 1
48.3 Volume Percent
83.3 Volume Percent
22.2 Volume Percent
7.2 Volume Percent
0.82 Volume Percent
0.82 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.58 Volumn Percent
0.81 Volume Percent
22.3 Volume Percent
0.73228 60/60F
61.73 Degrees API
0.731 55 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
85.5 Degrees F
112.6 Degrees F
203.9 Degrees F
331.7 Degrees F
426.4 Degrees F
0.7 mL
97.6 mL
1.7 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Dat
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
6/23/2005
4/12/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
10/4/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/18/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amy[ Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13848
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
-------
02~Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13849
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13849 Comments;
637DER(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
1/2005.
506; 4-4-05; cap very loose, label
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
173 Parts Per Million
11.15 PS I
49.5 Volume Percent
84.4 Volume Percent
23.88 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.27 Volumn Percent
1.15 Volume Percent
23.2 Volume Percent
0.73312 60/60F
61.51 Degrees API
0.73239 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
87.6 Degrees F
113.5 Degrees F
201.2 Degrees F
324.9 Degrees F
411.6 Degrees F
0.8 ml
97.8 ml
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season:
8i bottle damp with gasoline
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Winter
Analysis Date
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
6/23/2005
4/12/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
8/9/2005
8/9/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
10/4/2005
10/4/2005
8/9/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/1 8/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13849
Page 2 of 2
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
il by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
-------
02-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13850
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13850 Comments:
VV]245(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5 599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
1/2005.
623; 1-31-05; cap loose-
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
84 Parts Per Million
12.24 PS I
43.3 Volume Percent
84.4 Volume Percent
27.15 Volume Percent
5 Volume Percent
0.73 Volume Percent
0.73 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
25.5 Volume Percent
0.73 Volume Percent
7.07 Volumn Percent
0.73377 60/60F
61.34 Degrees API
voc
Season: Winter
bottle « label damp with gasoline
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
Analysis Date
4/18/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
6/23/2005
4/12/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
10/4/2005
8/1 1/2005
8/1 1/2005
8/11/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/18/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
8/11/2005
10/4/2005
10/4/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13850
Page 2 of 2
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Density @ 60
degF D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
Total Recovery D86
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
DIPE
Isobutanol
Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol
n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
0.73305
83.3
107.8
219.2
323.4
409.3
0.7
97.3
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees
Degrees
Degrees
Degrees
Degrees
ml
ml
mL
Volume
F
F
F
F
F
Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/18/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/18/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/1 8/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
-------
02-Nov-05
Kansas City Samples
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Batch*
13851
Page 1 of 2
12.1.-T
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/11/2005.
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13851 Comments: 741; 2-24-05; bottle K label damp with gasoline
UMK459(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure byD5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by F1A D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
166 Parts Per Million
168 Parts Per Million
13.01 PS I
13.01 PS I
51 Volume Percent
84.7 Volume Percent
23.35 Volume Percent
9.3 Volume Percent
1.13 Volume Percent
1.13 Volume Percent
1.13 Volume Percent
1.13 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.5 Volumn Percent
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
Analysis Date
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
6/23/2005
6/23/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
1 0/4/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
8/11/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
10/4/2005
-------
02-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 13851
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanoi
5802 n-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D 5 599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
23.3 Volume Percent
1.12 Volume Percent
0.72948 60/60F
0.72946 60/60F
62.47 Degrees API
62.48 Degrees API
0.72874 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72876 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.7 Degrees F
101.5 Degrees F
197.7 Degrees F
324.7 Degrees F
411.8 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.2 mL
3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
8/1 1/2005
10/4/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/29/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
4/21/2005
-------
09-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13839
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13839 Comments;
230FZ](Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl 319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
1/2005.
#355; 9-2 1 -04; cap very loose,
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
1 49 Parts Per Million
7.21 PSI
38.5 Volume Percent
80.5 Volume Percent
32.6 1 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1 .63 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.39 Volumn Percent
1 .6 1 Volume Percent
33 Volume Percent
0.75546 60/60F
55.8 Degrees API
0.75471 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.5 Degrees F
1 40.9 Degrees F
224.6 Degrees F
334.2 Degrees F
4 1 7.9 Degrees F
0.9 mL
98 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
voc
Season: Winter
bottle and label damp with gasoline, label parti
Fuel_ 41 Analyst Analysis Date
Code:
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
NST 8/24/2005
NST 4/12/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
TW 11/8/2005
MM 8/8/2005
TW 8/24/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TW 11/8/2005
TW 11/8/2005
MM 8/8/2005
MM 4/18/2005
MM 4/18/2005
MM 4/18/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
MM 4/25/2005
TS 4/14/2005
TS 4/14/2005
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13839
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t- Amy 1 Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D 5 599
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D 5 599
byD5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
09-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
13833
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FT AC: 13833 Comments;
QHM049
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by.D519l (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
D86
D86
D86
D86
1/2005.
556; 1-17-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
373 Parts Per Million
14.24 PS I
14.24 PS I
50.4 Volume Percent
85.2 Volume Percent
22.58 Volume Percent
22.57 Volume Percent
10.2 Volume Percent
1.27 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.3 Volume Percent
1.25 Volume Percent
1.25 Volume Percent
5.14 Volumn Percent
5.1 Volumn Percent
0.72724 60/60F
63.07 Degrees API
0.72652 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81 Degrees F
99.5 Degrees F
199.2 Degrees F
318.4 Degrees F
402.6 Degrees F
0.8 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Dat
4/13/2005
4/1 3/2005
4/1 3/2005
4/13/2005
8/24/2005
4/12/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
11/8/2005
1 1/8/2005
7/29/2005
8/24/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
7/29/2005
11/8/2005
11/8/2005
11/8/2005
11/8/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
-------
09-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13833
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-PropanoI
sec-Butanol
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
96.8
2.4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ml
mL
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/1 3/2005
4/1 3/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
-------
09-Nov-°s NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue ..., , , H .,
'
13837
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/11/2005.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13837 Comments: 582; 1-21-05; bottle, label and
612GLS(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
overpack damp with gasoline
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME byD5599
572 TAME byD5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5 769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
351 Parts Per Million
14.16 PS I
52 Volume Percent
85.9 Volume Percent
22.69 Volume Percent
9.4 Volume Percent
1.39 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
21.9 Volume Percent
1.36 Volume Percent
5.26 Volumn Percent
0.72622 60/60F
63.34 Degrees API
0.7255 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Dat
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/1 3/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
8/24/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
11/8/2005
7/29/2005
8/24/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/1 3/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
7/29/2005
11/8/2005
11/8/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
-------
O9-Nov-05
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
DIPE
Isobutanol
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
n-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
83.7 Degrees F
99.5 Degrees F
195.1 Degrees F
31 8.9 Degrees F
405 Degrees F
0.8 mL
96.7 mL
2.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
13837
Page 2 of 2
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/13/2005
4/1 3/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
4/13/2005
-------
09-Nov-°5 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
fit.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 4/1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 13840 Comments:
VMI391(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
1 50 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
13840
Page 1 of 2
1/2005.
308; 9-10-04; cap loose
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
174 Parts Per Million
6.22 PS I
36.7 Volume Percent
80.8 Volume Percent
34.83 Volume Percent
7.7 Volume Percent
2.01 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.97 Volume Percent
8.13 Volumn Percent
35.7 Volume Percent
0.76029 60/60F
0.76026 60/60F
54.62 Degrees API
54.61 Degrees API
0.75951 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75954 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.1 Degrees F
146.1 Degrees F
227.3 Degrees F
331.3 Degrees F
417.8 Degrees F
0.8 ml
97.6 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Dat
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
8/24/2005
4/12/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
11/8/2005
8/8/2005
8/24/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
11/8/2005
11/8/2005
8/8/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/18/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
4/25/2005
-------
09-Nov-OS
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
13840
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol
byD5599
1.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ml
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
4/25/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
4/1 4/2005
4/14/2005
4/14/2005
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14276
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14276 Comments:
891LAC(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
11/23/05.
782; 3-5-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
119 Parts Per Million
12.59 PS I
53.3 Volume Percent
85.6 Volume Percent
22.63 Volume Percent
7.8 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.26 Volumn Percent
1.11 Volume Percent
21.8 Volume Percent
0.72652 60/60F
0.72653 60/60F
63.26 Degrees API
63.26 Degrees API
0.7258 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72581 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.9 Degrees F
104.5 Degrees F
192.1 Degrees F
322.5 Degrees F
414 Degrees F
0.9 ml
96.8 ml
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
3/2/06
1 1 /25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/17/05
11/28/05
12/6/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/17/05
12/17/05
11/28/05
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/28/05
1 1 /28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
1 1 /28/05
1 1 /28/05
-------
06-Mar-06
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14276
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
2.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/28/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14277
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14277 Comments:
218KZS(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by RA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
11 /23/05.
299; 9-9-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
13 Parts Per Million
6.38 PS I
6.38 PS I
29.1 Volume Percent
85,7 Volume Percent
27.74 Volume Percent
2.1 Volume Percent
1.71 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
8.31 Volumn Percent
27.2 Volume Percent
1.65 Volume Percent
0.74496 60/60F
0.74504 60/60F
58.44 Degrees API
58.42 Degrees API
0.74423 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74431 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.9 Degrees F
154.8 Degrees F
227.2 Degrees F
318.9 Degrees F
401.9 Degrees F
0.9 mL
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
MM
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
3/2/06
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/17/05
11/28/05
12/6/05
1 2/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/17/05
11/28/05
12/17/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
1 1 /28/05
11/28/05
-------
06-Mar-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14277
97.5 ml
1.6 mL
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14278
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14278 Comments:
202GMB(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent
D86
1 /23/05.
725; 2-22-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
195 Parts Per Million
12.71 PS I
50.4 Volume Percent
84.7 Volume Percent
23.18 Volume Percent
23.22 Volume Percent
9.4 Volume Percent
1.19 Volume Percent
1.21 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.4 Volume Percent
5.65 Volumn Percent
5.64 Volumn Percent
1.14 Volume Percent
1.14 Volume Percent
0.7288 60/60F
0.72875 60/60F
62.67 Degrees API
62.66 Degrees API
0.72808 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72803 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.8 Degrees F
103.4 Degrees F
198.7 Degrees F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
3/2/06
1 1 /25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/17/05
12/17/05
11/28/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
11/28/05
12/17/05
12/17/05
12/17/05
12/17/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
1 1 /28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
-------
06-Mar-06
190
200
201
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
321.7 Degrees F
406.7 Degrees F
0.9 mL
96.7 mL
2.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14278
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/28/05
11/28/05
1 1 /28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14279
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14279 Comments:
601NZR(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D51 91 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D131 9
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
D86
D86
D86
D86
11/23/05.
736; 2-24-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
230 Parts Per Million
12.4 PS I
51.8 Volume Percent
84.8 Volume Percent
24.09 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
1.02 Volume Percent
1.02 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.5 Volumn Percent
0.99 Volume Percent
22.6 Volume Percent
0.72854 60/60F
0.72855 60/60F
62.72 Degrees API
62.73 Degrees API
0.72782 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72783 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.6 Degrees F
104.3 Degrees F
195.1 Degrees F
321.1 Degrees F
408.1 Degrees F
0.8 ml
voc
Season:
Fuel 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/28/05
1 1 /28/05
12/21/05
12/1/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
12/1/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
-------
06-Mar-06
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14279
Total Recovery D86
Loss D86
Methanol by D5599
Isopropanol by D5599
t-Butanol by D5599
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
96.8 mL
2.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
-------
t*Mtf06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14280
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14280
218KZS(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Comments:
1 /23/05.
618; 1-29-05
Results Units
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
172
13.97
50.3
84.2
21.44
10.7
0.94
0.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
20.5
4.85
0.91
0.72381
0.72383
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
3/6/06
1 1 /25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/21/05
12/1/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/1/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
1 1 /25/05
11/25/05
-------
06-Mar-06
692
692
691
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Degrees API D4052
Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanoi by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
63.99 Degrees API
63.99 Degrees API
0.72309 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72312 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.1 Degrees F
98.1 Degrees F
199.2 Degrees F
328.5 Degrees F
424.8 Degrees F
0.9 mL
96.6 ml
2.5 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14280
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
-------
06-Mar-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14281
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 11 /23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14281 Comments: 727; 2-22-05
QMH404(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 0.00
562 ETBE by D5599 0.00
534 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
572 TAME by D5599 0.00
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 139
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 12.68
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86 52
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86 83
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769 23.68
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319 13.1
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.03
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.03
532 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
55 MTBE by D5599 0.00
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599 0.00
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599 0.00
57 TAME byD5599 0.00
56 ETBE by D5599 0.00
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769 5.19
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769 0.99
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl 319 24
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.72948
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.7295
692 Degrees API D4052 62.47
692 Degrees API D4052 62.47
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.72876
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.72878
101 Initial Boiling Point D86 84.2
110 10 Percent D86 103.6
150 50 Percent D86 194.4
190 90 Percent D86 330.5
200 End Point D86 412.9
201 Residue D86 1
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg f
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
ml
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/28/05
1 1 /28/05
12/21/05
12/1/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
12/1/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/28/05
11/28/05
1 1 /28/05
1 1 /28/05
1 1 /28/05
11/28/05
-------
06-Mar-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14281
96.9 mL
2.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/28/05
11/28/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
06-Mar-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14282
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14282 Comments:
SIX770(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
D86
D86
D86
11723/05.
632; 2-2-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
348 Parts Per Million
346 Parts Per Million
14.01 PS I
50.7 Volume Percent
85.6 Volume Percent
22.12 Volume Percent
9.2 Volume Percent
1.08 Volume Percent
1.08 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
20.6 Volume Percent
5.14 Volumn Percent
1.04 Volume Percent
0.72335 60/60F
0.72337 60/60F
64.11 Degrees API
64.12 Degrees API
0.72263 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72266 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
78.7 Degrees F
98.1 Degrees F
198 Degrees F
317.6 Degrees F
401 Degrees F
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
12/1/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/1/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
201
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14282
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
0.9 mL
96.7 mL
2.4 mL
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
1 2/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
-------
06-Mar-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14283
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14283 Comments:
ULUlOl(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
D86
D86
D86
D86
1 /23/05.
619;l-29-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
389 Parts Per Million
13.69 PS I
50.8 Volume Percent
85.7 Volume Percent
21.8 Volume Percent
9.8 Volume Percent
1.20 Volume Percent
1.20 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
20.6 Volume Percent
5.15 Volumn Percent
1.16 Volume Percent
0.72446 60/60F
0.7245 60/60F
63.81 Degrees API
63.82 Degrees API
0.72374 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72379 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
78.9 Degrees F
99.1 Degrees F
198 Degrees F
317.1 Degrees F
397.2 Degrees F
0.9 ml
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
1 1 /25/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
12/21/05
12/1/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/1/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
1 1 /29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14283
Total Recovery D86
Loss D86
Methanol by D5599
Isopropanol by D5599
t-Butanol by D5599
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
96.7 ml
2.4 ml
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
°^Mar'06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14284
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 11 /23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14284 Comments: #7; 7/14/04
100RC7(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 0.00
562 ETBE by D5599 0.00
534 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
572 TAME by D5599 0.00
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 56
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 53
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 6.47
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86 34.1
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86 81.3
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769 34.9
49 Olefinsin byRA D1319 10.5
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319 10.5
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.71
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.71
532 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
55 MTBE by D5599 0.00
57 TAME byD5599 0.00
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599 0.00
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599 0.00
56 ETBE by D5599 0.00
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769 12.37
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319 35.4
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769 0.68
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319 35.5
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76139
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76133
692 Degrees API D4052 54.36
692 Degrees API D4052 54.35
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76063
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76058
101 Initial Boiling Point D86 98.4
110 10 Percent D86 143.9
150 50 Percent D86 232.3
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Anolys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
MM
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
190
200
201
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
339.2 Degrees F
428.1 Degrees F
1 ml
97.5 mL
1.5 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14284
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
06-Mar-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14284
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 11/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14284 Comments: #7; 7/14/04
100RC7(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 0.00
562 ETBE by D5599 0.00
534 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
572 TAME by D5599 0.00
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 56
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 53
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 6.47
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86 34.1
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86 81.3
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769 34.9
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319 10.5
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319 10.5
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.71
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.71
532 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
55 MTBE by D5599 0.00
57 TAME byD5599 0.00
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599 0.00
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599 0.00
56 ETBE by D5599 0.00
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769 12.37
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319 35.4
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769 0.68
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319 35.5
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76139
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76133
692 Degrees API D4052 54.36
692 Degrees API D4052 54.35
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76063
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.76058
101 Initial Boiling Point D86 98.4
110 10 Percent D86 143.9
150 50 Percent D86 232.3
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
MM
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
12/5/05
1 2/20/05
1 2/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
12/21/05
1 2/5/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
-------
06-Mar-O6
190
200
201
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
339.2 Degrees F
428.1 Degrees F
1 ml
97.5 ml
1.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14284
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
06-Mar'06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14285
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 11 /23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14285 Comments: 640; 2-3-05
VHW541(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 0.00
562 ETBE by D5599 0.00
534 Ethanol byD5599 0.00
572 TAME by D5599 0.00
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 86
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 12.71
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86 43.7
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86 84.8
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769 28.16
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319 5.2
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.57
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.57
532 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
55 MTBE by D5599 0.00
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599 0.00
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599 0.00
57 TAME byD5599 0.00
56 ETBE by D5599 0.00
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319 25.7
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769 8.41
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769 0.54
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73285
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.7329
692 Degrees API D4052 61.57
692 Degrees API D4052 61.58
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73212
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73218
101 Initial Boiling Point D86 80.8
110 10 Percent D86 103
150 50 Percent D86 218
190 90 Percent D86 321.8
200 End Point D86 407.5
201 Residue D86 0.9
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
ml
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Anolys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/5/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14285
96.8 mL
2.3 mL
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
-------
OM/kf06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14286
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 11 /23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14286 Comments: 633; 2-2-05
VQH913(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 0.00
562 ETBE by D5599 0.00
534 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
572 TAME by D5599 0.00
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 77
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 12.13
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86 39.5
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86 87
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769 30.17
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319 3.7
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.67
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 0.67
532 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
55 MTBE by D5599 0.00
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599 0.00
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599 0.00
57 TAME byD5599 0.00
56 ETBE by D5599 0.00
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319 27.8
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769 11.3
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769 0.65
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.7383
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73829
692 Degrees API D4052 60.16
692 Degrees API D4052 60.16
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73757
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73756
101 Initial Boiling Point D86 83.8
110 10 Percent D86 108.3
150 50 Percent D86 221.4
190 90 Percent D86 314.9
200 End Point D86 407.5
201 Residue D86 0.8
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
ml
voc
Season:
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
1 1 /29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/5/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
1 1 /29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
1 1 /29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14286
96.9 ml
2.3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
-------
OM/k"06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14287
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 11/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14287 Comments: 819; 3-12-05
374CL9(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 0.00
562 ETBE by D5599 0.00
534 Ethanol byD5599 0.00
572 TAME by D5599 0.00
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 146
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 11.39
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 11.37
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86 51
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86 84.3
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769 24.68
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319 8.9
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.01
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.01
532 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
55 MTBE by D5599 0.00
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599 0.00
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599 0.00
57 TAME byD5599 0.00
56 ETBE by D5599 0.00
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769 5.92
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769 0.97
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319 24
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.7312
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73118
692 Degrees API D4052 62.02
692 Degrees API D4052 62.02
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73046
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.73048
101 Initial Boiling Point D86 84.9
110 10 Percent D86 109.8
150 50 Percent D86 197.6
190 90 Percent D86 328.6
200 End Point D86 416.1
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
12/20/05
1 2/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
12/5/05
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
11/29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
201
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14287
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
1 mL
97.1 mL
1.9 mL
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
1 1 /29/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14288
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 11/23/05.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14288 Comments: 801; 3-9-05
108CTB(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 0.00
562 ETBE by D5599 0.00
534 Ethanol byD5599 0.00
572 TAME by D5599 0.00
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622 94
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified) 13.1
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86 51.7
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86 85
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769 20.58
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319 8.9
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.01
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.01
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.01
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 1.01
55 MTBE by D5599 0.00
532 Ethanol by D5599 0.00
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599 0.00
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599 0.00
57 TAME byD5599 0.00
56 ETBE by D5599 0.00
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319 20.2
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769 4.49
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769 0.97
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.72308
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052 0.72315
692 Degrees API D4052 64.17
692 Degrees API D4052 64.19
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.72237
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052 0.72244
101 Initial Boiling Point D86 80.3
110 10 Percent D86 101.5
150 50 Percent D86 195.9
190 90 Percent D86 322.6
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
Volume Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
1 2/6/05
12/20/05
1 2/20/05
12/20/05
1 2/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
200
201
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14288
Page 2 of 2
End Point D86
Residue D86
Total Recovery D86
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
416 Degrees F
1 mL
96.7 mL
2.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
11/29/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
11/29/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14288
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14288 Comments:
108CTB(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanoi by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanoi by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
11/23/05.
801; 3-9-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
94 Parts Per Million
13.1 PS I
51.7 Volume Percent
85 Volume Percent
20.58 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1.01 Volume Percent
1.01 Volume Percent
1.01 Volume Percent
1.01 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
20.2 Volume Percent
4.49 Volumn Percent
0.97 Volume Percent
0.72308 60/60F
0.72315 60/60F
64.17 Degrees API
64.19 Degrees API
0.72237 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72244 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.3 Degrees F
101.5 Degrees F
195.9 Degrees F
322.6 Degrees F
voc
Season:
FueL 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis [
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/21/05
1 2/6/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
1 2/20/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
200
201
202
203
643
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14288
Page 2 of 2
End Point D86
Residue D86
Total Recovery D86
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
416 Degrees F
1 ml
96.7 ml
2.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
06-Mar-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14289
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14289 Comments:
VIW630
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
D86
D86
D86
D86
1 /23/05.
(4); 7/13/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
321 Parts Per Million
6,43 PS I
35.5 Volume Percent
80.9 Volume Percent
27.79 Volume Percent
8.7 Volume Percent
1.39 Volume Percent
1.39 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
27.9 Volume Percent
6.25 Volumn Percent
1.34 Volume Percent
0.75055 60/60F
0.7506 60/60F
57.02 Degrees API
57.03 Degrees API
0.74981 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74986 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
102.8 Degrees F
146.9 Degrees F
227.3 Degrees F
334.2 Degrees F
421.7 Degrees F
1 ml
FueL 41
Code:
voc
Season:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis C
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/29/05
1 1 /29/05
12/21/05
12/6/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
11/29/05
-------
06-Mar-06
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14289
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
97.5 ml
1.5 ml
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
1 1 /29/05
11/29/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14290
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 1
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14290
705DFG(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Comments:
1/23/05.
721; 2-21-05
Results Units
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.88
0.90
0.00
0.00
290
13.69
51
85.7
22.38
9
1.17
1.17
2.39
0.00
2,33
0.00
0.90
0.88
0.00
2.33
2.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.8
1.13
5.23
0.72875
0.72872
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PS I
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
60/60F
60/60F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 41 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
MM
TW
TW
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
3/6/06
11/25/05
11/30/05
1 1 /30/05
12/21/05
12/6/05
12/20/05
12/20/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/21/05
12/21/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
-------
06-Mar-06
692
692
691
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
Degrees API D4052
Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
62.67 Degrees API
62.68 Degrees API
0.72803 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.728 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.9 Degrees F
100.9 Degrees F
197.1 Degrees F
320 Degrees F
399.5 Degrees F
0.9 ml_
96.8 ml_
2.3 ml_
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14290
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
11/25/05
1 1 /25/05
11/25/05
11/25/05
11/30/05
11/30/05
11/30/05
1 1 /30/05
1 1 /30/05
11/30/05
1 1 /30/05
11/30/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
1 2/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
12/6/05
-------
15-Jun-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14525
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/15/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14525 Comments: 870; 4/7/05
685SBB(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
191 Parts Per Million
9.95 PS I
9.95 PS I
45.4 Volume Percent
83.5 Volume Percent
24.6 Volume Percent
1.20 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
5.66 Volumn Percent
0.73771 60/60F
0.73763 60/60F
60.31 Degrees API
60.33 Degrees API
0.73698 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7369 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
90.1 Degrees F
121.9 Degrees F
210.2 Degrees F
328.6 Degrees F
408.9 Degrees F
1 mL
98.1 mL
0.9 mL
Fuel 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis D
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/15/2006
5/15/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
-------
15-Jun-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14525
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
Isobutanol
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol
by D5599
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
-------
15-Jun-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14524
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/15/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14524 Comments: 877; 3/22/05
192GE3(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
154 Parts Per Million
11.08 PS I
11.07 PS I
48.4 Volume Percent
82 Volume Percent
24.03 Volume Percent
0.98 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.96 Volume Percent
4.79 Volumn Percent
0.73449 60/60F
0.73449 60/60F
61.15 Degrees API
61.15 Degrees API
0.73377 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73377 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
87.6 Degrees F
114.3 Degrees F
204.1 Degrees F
331.5 Degrees F
414.4 Degrees F
1 mL
97.8 mL
1.2 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/15/2006
5/15/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
-------
15-Jun-06
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14524
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
I by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
-------
15-Jun-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14523
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/15/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14523 Comments: 698; 2/16/05
TIY708(KS)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
98 Parts Per Million
13.74 PS I
52.8 Volume Percent
84.8 Volume Percent
21.47 Volume Percent
1 .02 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.98 Volume Percent
5.03 Volumn Percent
0.72484 60/60F
0.72483 60/60F
63.72 Degrees API
63.72 Degrees API
0.72412 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72412 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.6 Degrees F
101.2 Degrees F
192 Degrees F
325.5 Degrees F
416.4 Degrees F
1 ml
97.7 ml
1.3 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM .
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
'MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/15/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/22/2006
-------
15-Jun-06
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14523
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
-------
15-Jun-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14517
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/15/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14517 Comments: 118; 8/6/04
487SKA(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
159 Parts Per Million
8.01 PS I
45.8 Volume Percent
81 .2 Volume Percent
23.91 Volume Percent
0.98 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.97 Volume Percent
4.83 Volumn Percent
0.73992 60/60F
0.73989 60/60F
59.74 Degrees API
59.75 Degrees API
0.73919 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73916 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
94.5 Degrees F
130.3 Degrees F
210 Degrees F
339.7 Degrees F
438.1 Degrees F
1.1 ml
98.1 ml
0.8 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel_ 41 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/15/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/18/2006
-------
15-Jun-06
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14517
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
-------
15-Jun-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14516
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/15/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14516 Comments: 21; 7/19/04
340CLR(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
197 Parts Per Million
6.56 PS I
37.4 Volume Percent
82 Volume Percent
34.58 Volume Percent
1 .96 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1 .93 Volume Percent
8.15 Volumn Percent
0.75855 60/60F
0.75854 60/60F
55.04 Degrees API
55.04 Degrees API
0.7578 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75779 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.1 Degrees F
145.2 Degrees F
226.4 Degrees F
326.9 Degrees F
413.3 Degrees F
1 mL
98.2 mL
0.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
Fuel 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
Analysis Date
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/15/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/18/2006
5/22/2006
5/22/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/16/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/17/2006
5/18/2006
-------
15-Jun-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14516 Pa9e2of 2
584 Isopropanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
585 t-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
586 n-Propanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
587 sec-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
588 DIPE by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
589 Isobutanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
5802 n-Butanol by D5599 0.00 Volume Percent TS 5/18/2006
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/2006.
Kansas City Sampies-03VV FTAG: 14541 Comments: 36; 7/21/04
Results Units
14541
Page 1 of 2
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oiefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
137 Parts Per Million
8.24 PS I
47 Volume Percent
82.6 Volume Percent
26.34 Volume Percent
7.9 Volume Percent
1.24 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
25.8 Volume Percent
1.24 Volume Percent
5.73 Volumn Percent
0.73988 60/60F
0.73996 60/60F
59.73 Degrees API
59.75 Degrees API
0.73915 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73923 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
92.2 Degrees F
128.9 Degrees F
207.2 Degrees F
331.6 Degrees F
433.4 Degrees F
1.2 ml
97.9 mL
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM _
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/22/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
6/1/2006
7/6/2006
5/31/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
7/6/2006
6/1/2006
6/1/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
-------
06-Jul-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14541
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol
byD5599
0.9 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/23/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
-------
06-Ju1-06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Keport
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14542 Comments: 117; 8/6/04
14542
Page 1 of 2
SKA566(KS)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD DS769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
D86
D86
691
691
101
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
111 Parts Per Million
6.21 PS I
36.8 Volume Percent
77.9 Volume Percent
35.87 Volume Percent
8.1 Volume Percent
2.12 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
36.3 Volume Percent
2.11 Volume Percent
8.96 Volumn Percent
0.76317 60/60F
0.76314 60/60F
53.92 Degrees API
53.91 Degrees API
0.76238 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.76242 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.8 Degrees F
147 Degrees F
227.6 Degrees F
344 Degrees F
420.8 Degrees F
1 mL
98.1 mL
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/22/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
6/1/2006
7/6/2006
5/31/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
7/6/2006
6/1/2006
6/1/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
-------
06-Jul-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14542
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-ButanoI
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D 5 599
by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol
byD5599
0.9 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
-------
06-JU'-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/2006.
Kansas Qty Samples- FTAG: 14543 Comments: 142; 8/11/04
LHDACH(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
552 MTBEbyD5599
14543
Page 1 of 2
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl 319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
140 Parts Per Million
140 Parts Per Million
6.48 PS I
37 Volume Percent
80.5 Volume Percent
33.69 Volume Percent
8.5 Volume Percent
1.76 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
34.5 Volume Percent
1.77 Volume Percent
7.61 Volumn Percent
0.75881 60/60F
0.75872 60/60F
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/22/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
6/1/2006
7/6/2006
5/31/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
7/6/2006
6/1/2006
6/1/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
-------
O6-]ul-06
692
692
691
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14543
Degrees API D4052
Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methane I
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
D1PE
DIPE
Isobutanol
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
n-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D 5 599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
55 Degrees API
54.98 Degrees API
0.75806 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75797 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.1 Degrees F
146.7 Degrees F
226.6 Degrees F
335.9 Degrees F
424.8 Degrees F
1 ml
98.1 mL
0.9 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
. Page 2 of 2
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
-------
06-Jul-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/2006.
Kansas City Samples-QPN- FTAG: 14544 Comments: 164; 8/16/04
387
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D 5 599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
14544
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.01 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
128 Parts Per Million
8.22 PS 1
45.7 Volume Percent
78.4 Volume Percent
26.26 Volume Percent
10.9 Volume Percent
0.84 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.06 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.06 Volume Percent
0.01 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.9 Volumn Percent
0.84 Volume Percent
27.4 Volume Percent
0.74492 60/60F
0.74489 60/60F
58.46 Degrees API
58.45 Degrees API
0.74419 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7441 5 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
92.8 Degrees F
126.8 Degrees F
212.9 Degrees F
348.8 Degrees F
426.4 Degrees F
1 mL
98 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/30/2006
5/22/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
6/1/2006
7/6/2006
5/31/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
6/1/2006
6/1/2006
7/6/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/23/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
-------
06-Jul-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14544
203 Loss
543 Methano!
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-ButanoI
588 D1PE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
-------
I2'JUI'06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14545 Comments: 188; 8/20/04
4085EB(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
562 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE • by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oleflnsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene In Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
14545
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
70 Parts Per Million
6.72 PS I
41.2 Volume Percent
78.5 Volume Percent
28.52 Volume Percent
13 Volume Percent
1.03 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.02 Volumn Percent
1.04 Volume Percent
29.7 Volume Percent
0.75344 60/60F
0.75343 60/60F
56.31 Degrees API
56.31 Degrees API
0.7527 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75268 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.7 Degrees F
140.2 Degrees F
220.2 Degrees F
346.8 Degrees F
428 Degrees F
1 mi.
97.9 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM •
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/30/06
5/22/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
6/1/06
7/12/06
5/31/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
6/1/06
6/1/06
7/12/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
-------
12-M-06
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14545
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
1.1 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
-------
'2~Jul~06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14546 Comments: 232; 8/28/04
877XFG(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
562 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur In Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatlcs in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene In Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatlcs by FIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
14546
Page 1 of 2
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
64 Parts Per Million
6.74 PS I
35.3 Volume Percent
81 Volume Percent
34.61 Volume Percent
9.3 Volume Percent
0.93 Volume Percent
0.93 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
11.49 Volumn Percent
0.93 Volume Percent
35.3 Volume Percent
0.761760/60F
0.76169 60/60F
54.27 Degrees API
54.27 Degrees API
0.76095 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.76094 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
95.4 Degrees F
143.3 Degrees F
230.3 Degrees F
341.1 Degrees F
424.3 Degrees F
0.9 ml
U.S.
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/30/06
5/22/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
.6/1/06
7/12/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
6/1/06
6/1/06
7/12/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
-------
I2-Ju/~06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methano! by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14546
98.1 ml
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
-------
12JUH* NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/06.
14547
Page 1 of 2
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14547
853ALT(AR)
Test Test Method
Code
562 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Comments:
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsln byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
417; 9/27/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
50 Parts Per Million
8.44 PS I
8.43 PS I
45.1 Volume Percent
81.3 Volume Percent
24.78 Volume Percent
9.6 Volume Percent
0.85 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
24.4 Volume Percent
0.84 Volume Percent
5.16 Volumn Percent
0,74233 60/60F
0.74233 60/60F
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel. 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
Analysis
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/30/06
5/22/06
5/22/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
6/2/06
7/12/06
6/7/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
7/12/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
-------
I2-M-06
692
692
691
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14547
Page 2 of 2
Degrees API D4052
Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
59.12 Degrees API
59.12 Degrees API
0.7416 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7416 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
92.4 Degrees F
129,5 Degrees F
210.8 Degrees F
341.7 Degrees F
429.2 Degrees F
1 ml
97.9 ml
1.1 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
-------
'*JuH* NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/22/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14548 Comments: 434; 9/29/04
QMY157
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur In Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatlcs in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsln byFIA D1319
64 Benzene In Gasoline D3606
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene In gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene In Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
14548
Page 1 of 2
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
90 Parts Per Million
7.35 PS I
7.37 PS I
38 Volume Percent
82.1 Volume Percent
27.93 Volume Percent
6.2 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.84 Volumn Percent
27 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.7461 60/60F
0.74611 60/60F
58.15 Degrees API
58.15 Degrees API
0.74537 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74536 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
96,2 Degrees F
139.3 Degrees F
223.6 Degrees F
332.1 Degrees F
412.4 Degrees F
1.2 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
5/30/06
5/22/06
5/22/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
6/2/06
7/12/06
6/7/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/2/06
7/12/06
6/2/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/23/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
5/24/06
-------
12-Jul-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutano! by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14548
Page 2 of 2
97.60001 ml
l,2mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
5/24/06
5/24/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
-------
'2~Jul"°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14564 Comments: Label partially obliterated
QEH690(Ks)
14564
Page 1 of 2
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics In Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
138 Parts Per Million
6.53 PS I
36.7 Volume Percent
79.2 Volume Percent
30.59 Volume Percent
11.9 Volume Percent
1.38 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
30.1 Volume Percent
1.37 Volume Percent
6.46 Volumn Percent
0.75573 60/60F
0.75569 60/60F
55.75 Degrees API
55.74 Degrees API
0.75499 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75495 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.6 Degrees F
146.7 Degrees F
226.9 Degrees F
342.7 Degrees F
433.2 Degrees F
0.9 ml
98.4 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Anolys
Code;
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/6/06
5/26/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/8/06
7/12/06
6/7/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
7/12/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
-------
J2-M-06
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14564
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
0.7 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/2/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14565 Comments-
QJG007(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE ' by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
14565
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
172
7.82
42.9
78.7
26.87
11.9
0.98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
26.1
0.98
4.96
0.74648
0.74643
58.07
58.06
0.74575
0.74569
94.2
132.8
217.8
344.8
428.3
1
98.3
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Oxy Percent
Parts Per Million
PSI
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Weight Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volumn Percent
60/60F
60/60F
Degrees API
Degrees API
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
ml
ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/6/06
5/26/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/8/06
7/12/06
6/7/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
7/12/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
-------
12-M-06
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14565
Page 2 of 2
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
0.7 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/2/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
-------
12'Jul'06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14566 Comments: 734; 2-23-05
450FCW(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
14566
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
157 Parts Per Million
13.45 PS I
53.2 Volume Percent
85,5 Volume Percent
21.55 Volume Percent
7.8 Volume Percent
1.10 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
20.2 Volume Percent
1.1 Volume Percent
5.09 Volumn Percent
0.72445 60/60F
0.72445 60/60F
63.82 Degrees API
63.82 Degrees API
0.72373 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72373 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82 Degrees F
103 Degrees F
191.8 Degrees F
323.7 Degrees F
416.2 Degrees F
1 ml
97.6 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/6/06
5/26/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/8/06
7/12/06
6/7/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
7/12/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
-------
12-M-06
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14566
Page 2 of 2
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
1.4 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/2/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
-------
]2-Ju!-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14567
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14567 Comments: Label partially obliterated.
QIS160(Ks)
voc
Season: Winter
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oleflnsln byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
691
691
101
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
287 Parts Per Million
5.4 PS I
30.8 Volume Percent
80.6 Volume Percent
31.96 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1.57 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.51 Volumn Percent
1.56 Volume Percent
30.7 Volume Percent
0.75983 60/60F
0.75975 60/60F
54.75 Degrees API
54.73 Degrees API
0.75908 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.759 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
104.4 Degrees F
158.8 Degrees F
234.6 Degrees F
333.3 Degrees F
405.5 Degrees F
1.1 ml
98.3 ml
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/6/06
5/26/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/8/06
7/12/06
6/7/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
7/12/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
6/2/06
6/2/06.
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
6/2/06
-------
12-M-06
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14567
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
by D5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
byD5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
0,6 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/2/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
6/5/06
-------
25-Ju'-06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/2006.
14568
Page 1 of 2
Kansas City Samples-
20430(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
FTAG: 14568
Comments:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
(600); 1/26/05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
379 Parts Per Million
13.56 PS I
49.1 Volume Percent
84.9 Volume Percent
22.67 Volume Percent
8.4 Volume Percent
1.19 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.2 Volume Percent
21.5 Volume Percent
5.22 Volumn Percent
0.727 60/60F
0.72691 60/60F
63.14 Degrees API
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
NST
TW
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/6/2006
5/26/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/7/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/8/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
-------
25-M-06
692
691
691
101
110
150
190
200
201
202
203
543
543
584
584
585
585
586
586
587
587
588
588
589
589
5801
5801
5802
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14568
Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
Residue
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Methanol
Isopropanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
DIPE
Isobutanol
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
n-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
63.16 Degrees API
0.72628 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72619 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.7 Degrees F
103.8 Degrees F
201.8 Degrees F
321.3 Degrees F
393.8 Degrees F
1.2 ml
97.3 mL
1.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
6/5/2006
-------
25-Ju'-06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14569 Comments: 780'3-5-05
QBI693(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE ' by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
14569
Page 1 of 2
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
136 Parts Per Million
140 Parts Per Million
12.02 PS I
51.7 Volume Percent
82.8 Volume Percent
24.06 Volume Percent
9.3 Volume Percent
1.04 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
23.5 Volume Percent
5.05 Volumn Percent
1.04 Volume Percent
0.73215 60/60F
0.73219 60/60F
61.77 Degrees API
61.76 Degrees API
0.73142 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73147 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84.4 Degrees F
108.9 Degrees F
195.8 Degrees F
332.3 Degrees F
408 Degrees F
1.1 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis [
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
5/26/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/7/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
-------
25-M-06
202
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14569
Total Recovery
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
97.6 mL
1.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent '
MM
MM-
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
-------
25-JU'-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14570
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14570 Comments: #383; 9-??-04; Label partially obliterated
JO??2Z(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
136 Parts Per Million
6.54 PS I
36.5 Volume Percent
80.4 Volume Percent
34.82 Volume Percent
8 Volume Percent
1.76 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
34.7 Volume Percent
1.74 Volume Percent
7.73 Volumn Percent
0.75968 60/60F
0.75968 60/60F
54.76 Degrees API
54.76 Degrees API
0.75893 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75893 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.7 Degrees F
146.3 Degrees F
229.2 Degrees F
332.1 Degrees F
400.6 Degrees F
1.1 ml
98.1 ml
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis C
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
5/26/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/7/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
-------
25-Jul-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14570
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
0.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/2/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
-------
25-JU'-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14571
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14571 Comments: 792; 3-8-05
TBL970(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
110 10 Percent D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
174 Parts Per Million
11.59 PS I
50.5 Volume Percent
50.5 Volume Percent
83.3 Volume Percent
83.4 Volume Percent
24.23 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
0.97 Volume Percent
0.97 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.6 Volume Percent
5.38 Volumn Percent
0.97 Volume Percent
0.73273 60/60F
0.73268 60/60F
61.63 Degrees API
61.61 Degrees API
0.73201 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73196 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
86.6 Degrees F
84.8 Degrees F
110.8 Degrees F
111.1 Degrees F
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
5/26/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/7/2006
6/7/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
-------
25-M-06
150
150
190
190
200
200
201
201
202
202
203
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14571
50 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
90 Percent
End Point
End Point
Residue
Residue
Total Recovery
Total Recovery
Loss
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
Isobutanol
t-Amyl Alcohol
n-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
199 Degrees F
198.7 Degrees F
328.7 Degrees F
328.9 Degrees F
411.7 Degrees F
414.3 Degrees F
0.9 mL
1 mL
97.8 mL
97.6 mL
1.2 mL
1.5 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/2/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
-------
25-Ju'-06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14572
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14572 Comments: 868; 3-21-05
SIY808(Ks)
VOC
Season: Winter
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
145 Parts Per Million
11.6 PS I
49 Volume Percent
82.5 Volume Percent
24.46 Volume Percent
10.1 Volume Percent
1.07 Volume Percent
0.08 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.14 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
22.7 Volume Percent
1.06 Volume Percent
5.21 Volumn Percent
0.73535 60/60F
0.73533 60/60F
60.93 Degrees API
60.93 Degrees API
0.73462 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7346 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84.3 Degrees F
112.8 Degrees F
202.3 Degrees F
332.1 Degrees F
409.9 Degrees F
1.1 mL
97.7 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis C
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
5/26/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/7/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
7/25/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
5/31/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
6/6/2006
-------
25-Jul-06
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
533 Ethanolby D4815
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14572
Page 2 of 2
1.2 mL
0.14 Volume Percent
8.965607 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/6/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
6/8/2006
-------
27-Ju'-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14573
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation VOC
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/06. Season: Winter
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14573 Comments: 779; 3-4-05; Label shows evidence of solvent exposure.
QGU468(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FlA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
154 Parts Per Million
6.66 PS I
39.6 Volume Percent
81.1 Volume Percent
27.68 Volume Percent
9.1 Volume Percent
1.26 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
27.1 Volume Percent
1.27 Volume Percent
6.37 Volumn Percent
0.75118 60/60F
0.75112 60/60F
56.88 Degrees API
56.87 Degrees API
0.75038 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75044 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.9 Degrees F
145.5 Degrees F
219.1 Degrees F
340.1 Degrees F
425.2 Degrees F
0.9 ml
98.3 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
5/26/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/9/06
7/27/06
6/7/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
7/27/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
-------
27-M-06
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14573
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
DIPE by D5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
0.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/6/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
27-JUI-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14574
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 5/25/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14574 Comments: 778; 3-4-05
OGU467(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599 '
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.02 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
106 Parts Per Million
9.99 PS I
48.9 Volume Percent
83.9 Volume Percent
24.73 Volume Percent
24.75 Volume Percent
7.3 Volume Percent
1.00 Volume Percent
0.05 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.02 Weight Percent
0.05 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.74 Volumn Percent
1.01 Volume Percent
23 Volume Percent
1.01 Volume Percent
5.73 Volumn Percent
0.73578 60/60F
0.7358 60/60F
60.81 Degrees API
60.81 Degrees API
0.73507 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73505 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
87.7 Degrees F
120.1 Degrees F
202.7 Degrees F
325.9 Degrees F
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM ,
TW
TW
NST
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
NST
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
5/26/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
7/27/06
6/7/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
7/27/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
5/31/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
-------
27-Jul-Od
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14574
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
423.2 Degrees F
1 ml
98,1 ml
0.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/6/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
10-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14593
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples-24Fl FTAG: 14593 Comments: 935; 4-6-05
voc
Season: Winter
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density-@ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
174 Parts Per Million
8.82 PS I
44.4 Volume Percent
80.6 Volume Percent
26.3 Volume Percent
26.46 Volume Percent
11.4 Volume Percent
1.10 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.61 Volumn Percent
24.7 Volume Percent
1.11 Volume Percent
5.58 Volumn Percent
1.11 Volume Percent
0.7438 60/60F
0.74383 60/60F
58.73 Degrees API
58.74 Degrees API
0.74309 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74306 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
90.4 Degrees F
127.4 Degrees F
213.1 Degrees F
337.6 Degrees F
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/8/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/14/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/13/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
-------
lO-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14593
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery' D86
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
418.8 Degrees F
1 mL
98 mL
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
J°-AU9-06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14591
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
VOC
Season: Winter
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14591
42453(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Comments:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
700; 2-16-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
346 Parts Per Million
13.3 PS I
50.8 Volume Percent
51 Volume Percent
85 Volume Percent
85.5 Volume Percent
21.81 Volume Percent
10.9 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
20.1 Volume Percent
1.19 Volume Percent
5.13 Volumn Percent
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
. 6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
8/9/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
-------
10-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14591
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
Initial Boiling Point D86
101
101
110
110
10 Percent
10 Percent
150 50 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
200 End Point
201 Residue
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
0.72472 60/60F
0.72472 60/60F
63.75 Degrees API
63.75 Degrees API
0.724 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.724 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
78.6 Degrees F
80.9 Degrees F
102.8 Degrees F
103.5 Degrees F •
198 Degrees F
197.5 Degrees F
320.2 Degrees F
319.6 Degrees F
398.4 Degrees F
397.3 Degrees F
0.9 mL
1 mL
97.6 mL
97.4 mL
1.5 mL
1.6 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
. 6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/9/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/1 2/06
-------
10-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14590
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14590 Comments: 667B; 2-9-05
QMY157(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE.byD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
235 Parts Per Million
14 PS I
51.1 Volume Percent
85 Volume Percent
22.88 Volume Percent
10.6 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.34 Volumn Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
21.2 Volume Percent
0.72558 60/60F
0.72557 60/60F
63.52 Degrees API
63.52 Degrees API
0.72486 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72485 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.7 Degrees F
100.4 Degrees F
197.2 Degrees F
322.8 Degrees F
404.2 Degrees F
1 ml
97.2 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/1 2/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/1 3/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
'6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
JO-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14590
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 ,sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS'
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
10-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14588
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14588 Comments: 655; 2-7-05
VUE539(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME • by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
3.35 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
186 Parts Per Million
14.21 PS I
57.6 Volume Percent
85.9 Volume Percent
20.65 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1.06 Volume Percent
8.90 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
8.90 Volume Percent
3.35 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.91 Volumn Percent
1.08 Volume Percent
19.9 Volume Percent
0.73207 60/60F
0.73207 60/60F
61.79 Degrees API
61.79 Degrees API
0.73135 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73135 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
83.8 Degrees F
104.1 Degrees F
157.8 Degrees F
320.5 Degrees F
401,5 Degrees F
0.9 ml
97.5 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis I
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
10-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14588
Page 2 of 2
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.6 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/1 2/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
]°-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14589
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14589 Comments: 667; 2-8-05
775ESO(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
178 Parts Per Million
13.29 PS I
49.4 Volume Percent
84.5 Volume Percent
23.67 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1.19 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.46 Volumn Percent
1.2 Volume Percent
21.8 Volume Percent
0.72818 60/60F
0.72811 60/60F
62.84 Degrees API
62.82 Degrees API
0.72746 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72739 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.9 Degrees F
104.6 Degrees F
201.4 Degrees F
323.7 Degrees F
407.1 Degrees F
0.9 ml
97.4 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM •
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
10-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14589
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.7 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
]°-Au9'06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14585
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14585 Comments: 356; 9-20-04
STJ1M3(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.11 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
31 Parts Per Million
8.35 PS I
45.3 Volume Percent
77.8 Volume Percent
21.63 Volume Percent
5.9 Volume Percent
0.44 Volume Percent
0.29 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.29 Volume Percent
0.11 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
2.09 Volumn Percent
0.44 Volume Percent
22 Volume Percent
0.7346 60/60F
0.7346 60/60F
61.12 Degrees API
61.12 Degrees API
0.73387 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73387 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
91.4 Degrees F
127.3 Degrees F
212.7 Degrees F
341.8 Degrees F
391.1 Degrees F
0.9 ml
97.9 ml
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/1 2/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/1 2/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
lO-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14585
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.2 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00- Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
1°-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14584
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14584 Comments: 65; 7-27-04
ASHARK(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent .086
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
75 Parts Per Million
8.18 PS I
48.2 Volume Percent
83.9 Volume Percent
19.71 Volume Percent
12 Volume Percent
0.75 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.99 Volumn Percent
0.75 Volume Percent
19.5 Volume Percent
0.73044 60/60F
0.73041 60/60F
62.23 Degrees API
62.22 Degrees API
0.72972 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72969 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
92.8 Degrees F
128.8 Degrees F
203.6 Degrees F
336.2 Degrees F
427.7 Degrees F
1 mL
97.9 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
' TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/9/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
10-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14584
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.1 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
!°-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14582
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14582 Comments: 17:7/17/04
SHU066(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
33 Parts Per Million
6.61 PS I
32.7 Volume Percent
82.4 Volume Percent
37.76 Volume Percent
6.6 Volume Percent
0.68 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
15.3 Volumn Percent
0.67 Volume Percent
37.7 Volume Percent
0.76351 60/60F
0.76341 60/60F
53.85 Degrees API
53.83 Degrees API
0.76276 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.76266 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
94.4 Degrees F
143.6 DegreesF
233.8 Degrees F
332.6 Degrees F
416 Degrees F
1 ml
98 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/8/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
W-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
byD5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14582
Page 2 of 2
1 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
10-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG .Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14583
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14583 Comments: 46; 7-23-04
J069660KS .
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
123 Parts Per Million
6.51 PS I
37.7 Volume Percent
79.9 Volume Percent
31.89 Volume Percent
9 Volume Percent
1.66 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.02 Volumn Percent
1.65 Volume Percent
32.1 Volume Percent
0.75534 60/60F
0.75533 60/60F
55.84 Degrees API
55.83 Degrees API
0.7546 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75458 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.7 Degrees F
145.5 Degrees F
226.1 Degrees F
338.7 Degrees F
428.8 Degrees F
0.9 mL
98.10001 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/8/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
10-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14583
203
543
584
585
586
587
588
589
5801
5802
Loss
Methanol
Isopropanol
t-Butanol
n-Propanol
sec-Butanol
DIPE
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
Isobutanol by D5599
t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
n-Butanol by D5599
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
'o-Aug-06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14595
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14595 Comments: 215; 2-15-04
VOX458(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21
Code:
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
346 Parts Per Million
6.8 PS I
35.9 Volume Percent
80.2 Volume Percent
30.45 Volume Percent
11.9 Volume Percent
1.40 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.42 Volume Percent
29.1 Volume Percent
6.95 Volumn Percent
0.75513 60/60F
0.75523 60/60F
55.86 Degrees API
55.88 Degrees API
0.75439 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75449 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.9 Degrees F
145.7 Degrees F
229.2 Degrees F
331.3 Degrees F
405.5 Degrees F
1 ml
97.89999 mL
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/20/06
8/9/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
8/9/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
JO-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14595
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
15-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14601
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
. Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14601 Comments: #120; 8/6/04
554CLW(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D.I 319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
85 Parts Per Million
6.85 PS I
40.5 Volume Percent
80.5 Volume Percent
31.4 Volume Percent
12.6 Volume Percent
1.31 Volume Percent
1.30 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
30.4 Volume Percent
8.24 Volumn Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
0.75508 60/60F
0.75506 60/60F
55.9 Degrees API
55.9 Degrees API
0.75433 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75431 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.2 Degrees F
142.6 Degrees F
220.4 Degrees F
340.5 Degrees F
425.7 Degrees F
1.1 mL
Fuei_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
8/15/06
6/21 /06
6/21/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
]S-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14601
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol byD5599
98 ml
0,9 ml
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
-------
15-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14602
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
VOC
Season: Winter
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14602
703SCZ(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Comments:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
#154:8/14/04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
211 Parts Per Million
6.47 PS I
36.6 Volume Percent
80.2 Volume Percent
33.17 Volume Percent
10.9 Volume Percent
1.63 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
31.4 Volume Percent
1.61 Volume Percent
7.22 Volumn Percent
0.75701 60/60F
0.757 60/60F
55.42 Degrees API
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/19/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
8/15/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
-------
15-Aug-06
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
55.42 Degrees API
0.75626 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75625 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.5 Degrees F
146.8 Degrees F
228.1 Degrees F
333.1 Degrees F
413.8 Degrees F
1 mL
98.1 mL
0.9 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14602
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
16-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14603
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14603 Comments: 179; 8-18-04
VSU617(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFlA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent .
0.00 Oxy Percent
261 Parts Per Million
6.47 PS I
36.3 Volume Percent
79.9 Volume Percent
31.77 Volume Percent
11.8 Volume Percent
1.50 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.48 Volume Percent
30.8 Volume Percent
6.89 Volumn Percent
0.75584 60/60F
0,75588 60/60F
55.7 Degrees API
55.71 Degrees API
0.7551 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75514g/cm-03@60degF
100.2 Degrees F
146.3 Degrees F
228.9 Degrees F
334.2 Degrees F
414.3 Degrees F
1.1 ml
97.8 ml
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/21/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
15-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14603
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1,1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
-------
15-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14604
U.S.
Page \ of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14604 Comments: 322; 9-15-04
WI325(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API ' D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
137 Parts Per Million
136 Parts Per Million
6.63 PS I
37.6 Volume Percent
80.5 Volume Percent
34.38 Volume Percent
9.6 Volume Percent
1.79 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.77 Volume Percent
33.4 Volume Percent
7.68 Volumn Percent
0.75744 60/60F
0.7575 60/60F
55.3 Degrees API
55.31 Degrees API
0.75669 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75675 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.1 Degrees F
143.6 Degrees F
227.1 Degrees F
329.4 Degrees F
406.3 Degrees F
1.1 ml
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS ,
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/1 9/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/21/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
15-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14604
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
97.8 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
-------
]5-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type; In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14605
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14605 Comments: 795; 3-9-05
532NZX(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur In Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110
150
190
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
169 Parts Per Million
12.79 PS I
51.1 Volume Percent
84.7 Volume Percent
22.64 Volume Percent
9.2 Volume Percent
1.08 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.07 Volume Percent
20.5 Volume Percent
5.24 Volumn Percent
0.72674 60/60F
0.72676 60/60F
63.2 Degrees API
63.21 Degrees API
0.72602 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72604 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84.2 Degrees F
106 Degrees F
197 Degrees F
325.1 DegreesF
412.6 DegreesF
1.1 ml
97.5 ml_
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM.
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/21/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
JS-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14605
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanoi
by D5599
by D5599
1.4 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/16/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
-------
16-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14606
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14606 Comments: 835; 3-16-05
453FEX(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
153 Parts Per Million
11.43 PS I
49.7 Volume Percent
82.6 Volume Percent
25.01 Volume Percent
11.2 Volume Percent
1.05 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.05 Volume Percent
5.24 Volumn Percent
22.9 Volume Percent
0.73345 60/60F
0.73338 60/60F
61.44 Degrees API
61.42 Degrees API
0.73266 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73273 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84.6 Degrees F
111 Degrees F
200.8 Degrees F
329.1 Degrees F
405.3 Degrees F
1.1 mL
97.3 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
8/15/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
15-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14606
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.6 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/16/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
-------
15-AU9*6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14586
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14586 Comments: 576; 1-20-05
VPB730(Ks)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME byD5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
172 Parts Per Million
13.36 PS I
54.1 Volume Percent
84.8 Volume Percent
23.58 Volume Percent
12 Volume Percent
1.28 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.69 Volumn Percent
1.28 Volume Percent
21.5 Volume Percent
0.72631 60/60F
0.72624 60/60F
63.34 Degrees API
63.32 Degrees API
0.72559 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72552 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.3 Degrees F
101 Degrees F
187.9 Degrees F
323.9 Degreesf
414,2 Degrees F
0.7 mL
97.1 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/14/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/14/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
15-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14586
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
2.2 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14587
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/7/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14587 Comments: 611; 1-28-05
568FFA(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Oleflnsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
113 Parts Per Million
13.31 PS I
49.7 Volume Percent
82.9 Volume Percent
23.14 Volume Percent
10,4 Volume Percent
0.92 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.85 Volumn Percent
0.92 Volume Percent
21.3 Volume Percent
0.72738 60/60F
0.72738 60/60F
63.03 Degrees API
63.03 Degrees API
0.72666 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72666 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.8 Degrees F
102.7 Degrees F
201.1 Degrees F
332.2 Degrees F
418.6 Degrees F
0.9 mL
97.4 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/15/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/13/06
8/14/06
6/14/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/1 2/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/13/06
6/13/06
8/14/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
6/8/06
-------
15-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14587
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.7mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/8/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
6/12/06
-------
15-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14596
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14596 Comments: #20; 7-19-04
SlQ677(Ka)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
_692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
163 Parts Per Million
7.56 PS I
43.3 Volume Percent
80.9 Volume Percent
27.43 Volume Percent
10.4 Volume Percent
1.37 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.39 Volume Percent
28.4 Volume Percent
6.2 Volumn Percent
0.7465 60/60F
0.74655 60/60F
58.04 Degrees API
58.05 Degrees API
0.74577 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74581 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
96.2 Degrees F
134.8 Degrees F
215.8 Degrees F
336.1 Degrees F
420.6 Degrees F
1 mL
97.9 mL
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/20/06
8/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
8/14/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/1 5/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
J5-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14596
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
15-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14597
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14597 Comments: 32; 7-21-04
JUP4TR(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates byD5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FiA D1319
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
114 Parts Per Million
6.14 PS I
36.8 Volume Percent
75.3 Volume Percent
36.93 Volume Percent
10.2 Volume Percent
9.9 Volume Percent
2.44 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
35.8 Volume Percent
36.8 Volume Percent
9.93 Volumn Percent
2.47 Volume Percent
0.76624 60/60F
0.7663 60/60F
53.15 Degrees API
53.17 Degrees API
0.76549 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.76554 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
103.6 Degrees F
147.5 DegreesF
228.4 Degrees F
350.5 Degrees F
419.4 DegreesF
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/20/06
8/14/06
8/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
8/14/06
8/14/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
15-Aug-Od
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14597
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
0.9 ml
98.2 ml
0.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14598
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14598 Comments: 64; 7-27-04
670DEB(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol byD5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599 .
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0,00 Oxy Percent
102 Parts Per Million
6.54 PS I
38.2 Volume Percent
79,5 Volume Percent
29.11 Volume Percent
10,3 Volume Percent
1.41 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.44 Volume Percent
29.5 Volume Percent
6.25 Volumn Percent
0.75185 60/60F
0.751960/60F
56.69 Degrees API
56.7 Degrees API
0,75111 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0,75116 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.5 Degrees F
144.8 Degrees F
224.5 Degrees F
340.3 Degrees F
434.1 Degrees F
1 mL
98 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/20/06
8/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
8/14/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
15-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14598
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
15-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14599
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14599 Comments: 69; 7-28-04
275SWL(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics In Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
146 Parts Per Million
7.57 PS I
43.5 Volume Percent
82.7 Volume Percent
29.93 Volume Percent
8.1 Volume Percent
1.62 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1.66 Volume Percent
29.7 Volume Percent
6.86 Volumn Percent
0.74651 60/60F
0.74653 60/60F
58.04 Degrees API
58.05 Degrees API
0.74577 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7458 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
97 Degrees F
135.3 Degrees F
214.8 Degrees F
327.7 Degrees F
420 Degrees F
1.2mL
97.89999 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/20/06
8/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
8/14/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
JS-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14599
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol byD5599
0.9 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
]6-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14600
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14600 Comments: 105; 8/4/06
977WEZ(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
. 69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
102 Parts Per Million
6.35 PS I
37.1 Volume Percent
81 Volume Percent
36.48 Volume Percent
6.8 Volume Percent
2.14 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
2.11 Volume Percent
35.7 Volume Percent
8.45 Volumn Percent
0,75991 60/60F
0.76 60/60F
54.69 Degrees API
54.71 Degrees API
0.75916g/cm-03@60degF
0.75924 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.8 Degrees F
147.4 Degrees F
226.6 Degrees F
327.7 Degrees F
411.9 Degrees F
1.2mL
98 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/21/06
8/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/1 6/06
6/16/06
6/21/06
8/14/06
6/21/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
6/15/06
-------
15-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14600
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
byD5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
0.8 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS'
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/15/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
-------
16-AU9-06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14607
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14607 Comments: 840; 3-17-05
078RC3(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
146 Parts Per Million
10.95 PS I
49.5 Volume Percent
82 Volume Percent
25.63 Volume Percent
11.8 Volume Percent
12.3 Volume Percent
1.02 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
1 Volume Percent
5.14 Volumn Percent
22.8 Volume Percent
23.8 Volume Percent
0.73568 60/60F
0.73567 60/60F
60.84 Degrees API
60.84 Degrees API
0.73495 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73496 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
85.6 Degrees F
113.7 Degrees F
201.3 Degrees F
335.1 Degrees F
411.9 Degrees F
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
. 6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/20/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
8/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/21/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
8/16/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
-------
16-Aug-06
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14607
Page 2 of 2
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
1.1 mL
97.5 mL
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
-------
16'Au9'06 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14608 Comments: 858; 3-19-05
837CZ2(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
14608
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
178 Parts Per Million
11.02 PS I
48 Volume Percent
81.7 Volume Percent
24.27 Volume Percent
12.5 Volume Percent
1.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.82 Volumn Percent
22.5 Volume Percent
0.99 Volume Percent
0.73465 60/60F
0.7347 60/60F
61.11 Degrees API
61.1 Degrees API
0.73397 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73393 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
85.8 Degrees F
114.4 Degrees F
205.3 Degrees F
335.1 Degrees F
420.3 Degrees F
1.1 mL
97.7 mL
u.s.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis L
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/20/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
6/21/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
-------
16-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14608
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
1.2 mL
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
0.00 Volume
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
-------
1MusH* NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14609 Comments: 875; 3-22-05
QQF730(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
14609
Page 1 of 2
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
247 Parts Per Million
12.4 PS I
49.1 Volume Percent
84.7 Volume Percent
24.18 Volume Percent
10.5 Volume Percent
1.34 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.56 Volumn Percent
21.6 Volume Percent
1.32 Volume Percent
0.73019 60/60F
0.7302 60/60F
62.29 Degrees API
62.28 Degrees API
0.72948 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72947 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
83.8 Degrees F
108.4 Degrees F
202.4 Degrees F
322.1 Degrees F
401 Degrees F
1.2 ml
97.4 ml
U.S.
voc
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/20/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
6/21/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
-------
16-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14609
Page 2 of 2
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
-------
16-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14610
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14610 Comments: 881; 3-23-05
446HJ2(Mo)
VOC
Season: Winter
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606 '
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
110 10 Percent D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
170 Parts Per Million
12.18 PS I
52.8 Volume Percent
52.8 Volume Percent
83.5 Volume Percent
83.8 Volume Percent
23.03 Volume Percent
10.3 Volume Percent
1.12 Volume Percent
1.12 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.89 Volumn Percent
1.11 Volume Percent
21.5 Volume Percent
0.72908 60/60F
0.72915 60/60F
62.58 Degrees API
62.56 Degrees API
0.72843 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72836 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
84.4 Degrees F
84.4 Degrees F
107.2 Degrees F
107.8 Degrees F
Fuel 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis C
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/20/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/21/2006
6/21/2006
8/16/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
-------
16-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14610
150 50 Percent
1 50 50 Percent
1 90 90 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
200 End Point
201 Residue
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
192.1
192.5
329.8
332
419.8
420.1
1.1
1.1
97.3
97.60001
1.6
1.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
Degrees F
mL
mL
mL
mL
mL
mL
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
-------
16-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14611
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/2006.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14611 Comments: 903; 3-26-05
144RBJ(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
115 Parts Per Million
11.6 PS I
50.9 Volume Percent
84.2 Volume Percent
23.94 Volume Percent
10.8 Volume Percent
1.12 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.5 Volumn Percent
22 Volume Percent
1.1 Volume Percent
0.73093 60/60F
0.73097 60/60F
62.09 Degrees API
62.08 Degrees API
0.73025 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73021 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
85 Degrees F
111.4 Degrees F
197.6 Degrees F
328.7 Degrees F
413.1 Degrees F
1 ml
97.7 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analyst
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis D
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/20/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/22/2006
8/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/22/2006
8/16/2006
6/22/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/14/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
6/16/2006
-------
16-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14611
D86
• by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
1.3 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/16/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
6/19/2006
-------
28-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14647
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14647 Comments: 94; 7-31-04; #2 Refuel
722KFE(Ks)
voc
Season: Winter
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
169 Parts Per Million
6.56 PS I
37.5 Volume Percent
79.8 Volume Percent
31.48 Volume Percent
9.9 Volume Percent
1.42 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.65 Volumn Percent
1.4 Volume Percent
30.6 Volume Percent
0.75623 60/60F
0.75618 60/60F
55.63 Degrees API
55.61 Degrees API
0.75549 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75543 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
97.7 Degrees F
146.8 Degrees F
225 Degrees F
337.9 Degrees F
433 Degrees F
1 ml
98 ml
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14647
Page 2 of 2
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14648
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14648 Comments: 104; 8/14/04
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.15 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
132 Parts Per Million
8.82 PS I
46.8 Volume Percent
81.7 Volume Percent
25.83 Volume Percent
10.5 Volume Percent
1.15 Volume Percent
0.41 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.15 Weight Percent
0.41 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
26 Volume Percent
1.15 Volume Percent
5.33 Volumn Percent
0.74096 60/60F
0.74102 60/60F
59.47 Degrees API
59.45 Degrees API
0.74022 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74029 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
91.4 Degrees F-
125.1 Degrees F
208.3 Degrees F
334.4 Degrees F
414.7 Degrees F
1.2 ml
97.4 ml
FueL 21
Code:
voc
Season:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/26/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
8/23/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
-------
28-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14648
Page 2 of 2
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-o6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14649
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14649 Comments: #116; 8/6/04
QBL235(KS)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.14 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
207 Parts Per Million
8.01 PS I
43.9 Volume Percent
80.3 Volume Percent
26.53 Volume Percent
10.6 Volume Percent
1.02 Volume Percent
1.03 Volume Percent
0.14 Weight Percent
0.38 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.38 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
26.1 Volume Percent
1.02 Volume Percent
5.15 Volumn Percent
0.74565 60/60F
0.74562 60/60F
58.28 Degrees API
58.27 Degrees API
0.74488 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74491 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
94.1 Degrees F
131.1 Degrees F
215.2 Degrees F
338.9 Degrees F
426.7 Degrees F
1 ml_
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis C
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/26/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
8/23/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
-------
28-Aug-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14649
97.9 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14650
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14650 Comments: #129; 8/9/04
461GLI(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
89 Parts Per Million
90 Parts Per Million
6.57 PS I
39.3 Volume Percent
79.5 Volume Percent
31.89 Volume Percent
11.7 Volume Percent
1.46 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
8.08 Volumn Percent
1.44 Volume Percent
31.9 Volume Percent
0.75758 60/60F
0.75754 60/60F
55.28 Degrees API
55.29 Degrees API
0.75683 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7568 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.2 Degrees F
144.6 Degrees F
222.6 Degrees F
343.2 Degrees F
426.2 Degrees F
0.9 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/26/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
-------
28-Aug-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol byD5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14650
Page 2 of 2
98.3 mL
0.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14651
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14651 Comments: 149; 8/12/04
660SEC(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110
150
190
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.01 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
93 Parts Per Million
6.79 PS I
38.1 Volume Percent
80.1 Volume Percent
33.87 Volume Percent
9.5 Volume Percent
1.66 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.03 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.03 Volume Percent
0.01 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.94 Volumn Percent
33.7 Volume Percent
1.65 Volume Percent
0.75814 60/60F
0.75818 60/60F
55.14 Degrees API
55.13 Degrees API
0.75739 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75743 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.3 Degrees F
144.7 Degrees F
225.6 Degrees F
335.3 Degrees F
422.2 Degrees F
1 mL
98.2 mL
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/29/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14651
Page 2 of 2
0.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aue-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14652
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14652 Comments: 203; 8-23-04
087FXJ(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110
150
190
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
197 Parts Per Million
5.79 PS I
34.1 Volume Percent
79.3 Volume Percent
35.11 Volume Percent
10 Volume Percent
1.72 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.8 Volumn Percent
34.3 Volume Percent
1.72 Volume Percent
0.76241 60/60F
0.76249 60/60F
54.09 Degrees API
54.07 Degrees API
0.76166 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.76174g/cm-03@60degF
103.1 Degrees F
152.6 Degrees F
232.8 Degrees F
337.8 Degrees F
422 Degrees F
1 mL
98.2 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/29/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-AUQ-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14652
Page 2 of 2
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
0.8 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Au3-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14653
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14653 Comments: 437; 9-30-04
254HPF
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110
150
190
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
54 Parts Per Million
9.27 PS I
48.4 Volume Percent
82.9 Volume Percent
22.43 Volume Percent
9.6 Volume Percent
0.82 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.76 Volumn Percent
21.4 Volume Percent
0.83 Volume Percent
0.73507 60/60F
0.73508 60/60F
61 Degrees API
61 Degrees API
0.73435 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73435 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
89.9 Degrees F
124.7 Degrees F
203.7 Degrees F
335.3 Degrees F
427.5 Degrees F
1.1 ml_
97.7 mL
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/30/06
8/23/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/30/06
8/23/06
6/30/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14653
Page 2 of 2
1:2 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-o6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14654
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14654 Comments
722KFE
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
6/23/06.
537; 1-12-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
395 Parts Per Million
14.13 PS I
49.7 Volume Percent
85.1 Volume Percent
22.34 Volume Percent
11.2 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.02 Volumn Percent
20.3 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.72664 60/60F
0.72665 60/60F
63.23 Degrees API
63.23 Degrees API
0.72592 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72593 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
79.6 Degrees F
100.1 Degrees F
200.8 Degrees F
319.7 Degrees F
395.7 Degrees F
1.1 mL
96.8 mL
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/30/06
8/23/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/30/06
8/23/06
6/30/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14654
Page 2 of 2
2.1 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-od NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14655
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Results Units
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14655 Comments: 570; 1-19-05
VSV986(Ks)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110
150
190
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
65 Parts Per Million
12.55 PS I
51.3 Volume Percent
85.3 Volume Percent
25.91 Volume Percent
8.9 Volume Percent
1.47 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.41 Volumn Percent
23.2 Volume Percent
1.47 Volume Percent
0.73199 60/60F
0.732 60/60F
61.81 Degrees API
61.8 Degrees API
0.73127 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73128 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.4 Degrees F
105.9 Degrees F
196.7 Degrees F
318.2 Degrees F
402.5 Degrees F
1 mL
97.3 mL
FueL 21 Anaiys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis L~
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/30/06
8/23/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/30/06
8/23/06
6/30/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.7 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14656
Page 1 of 2
U.S.
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14656 Comments: 631; 2-2-05
284MC6(Mo)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
VOC
Season: Winter
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
265 Parts Per Million
13.6 PS I
50.9 Volume Percent
51.1 Volume Percent
85.1 Volume Percent
85.1 Volume Percent
23.45 Volume Percent
10.1 Volume Percent
1.21 Volume Percent
21.4 Volume Percent
1.21 Volume Percent
5.39 Volumn Percent
0.72682 60/60F
0.72677 60/60F
63.18 Degrees API
63.2 Degrees API
0.7261 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72605 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.3 Degrees F
81 Degrees F
101.9 Degrees F
101.1 Degrees F
196.9 Degrees F
197.9 Degrees F
322.2 Degrees F
319.2 Degrees F
401.3 Degrees F
401.2 Degrees F
1.1 mL
1 ml
96.60001 ml
97.1 mL
1.9mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/30/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
8/28/06
6/30/06
6/30/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14656 page2of 2
203 Loss D86 2.3 mL MM 6/28/06
-------
28-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14657
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14657 Comments: 645; 2-4-05
406JR6(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
110 10 Percent D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
202 Parts Per Million
13.94 PS I
37.5 Volume Percent
50.2 Volume Percent
79.8 Volume Percent
84.1 Volume Percent
20.58 Volume Percent
11.5 Volume Percent
0.99 Volume Percent
0.99 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.99 Volume Percent
19 Volume Percent
4.49 Volumn Percent
0.72419 60/60F
0.7242 60/60F
63.89 Degrees API
63.89 Degrees API
0.72349 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72348 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
97.7 Degrees F
80.7 Degrees F
146.8 Degrees F
100.3 Degrees F
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/30/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/30/06
8/28/06
6/30/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14657
Page 2 of 2
150 50 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
200 End Point
201 Residue
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol byD5599
225 Degrees F
199.4 Degrees F
337.9 Degrees F
329.9 Degrees F
422.9 Degrees F
433 Degrees F
1 mL
1 mL
98 mL
97 mL
1 mL
2 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-o6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14660
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on
Kansas City Samples-
790LWF(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
6/26/06.
FTAG: 14660 Comments: 27; 7-20-04
Results Units
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21 Analys Analysis Date
Code:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
67 Parts Per Million
6.83 PS I
38.8 Volume Percent
80.3 Volume Percent
28.31 Volume Percent
28.29 Volume Percent
12.2 Volume Percent
0.81 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.81 Volume Percent
28.7 Volume Percent
7.41 Volumn Percent
7.38 Volumn Percent
0.81 Volume Percent
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TW
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/30/06
6/30/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/30/06
8/28/06
6/30/06
6/30/06
6/30/06
-------
28-Aug-o6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
14660
Page 2 of 2
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
0.75166 60/60F
0.75163 60/60F
56.75 Degrees API
56.76 Degrees API
0.75092 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75089 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.8 Degrees F
141.9 Degrees F
224.4 Degrees F
346 Degrees F
429.7 Degrees F
1 mL
98.2 mL
0.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14661
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/26/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14661 Comments: 25; 7-20-04
884DFT
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
84 Parts Per Million
85 Parts Per Million
6.21 PS I
36.4 Volume Percent
78.9 Volume Percent
30.45 Volume Percent
11.4 Volume Percent
1.49 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
29 Volume Percent
1.49 Volume Percent
6.49 Volumn Percent
0.75535 60/60F
0.75529 60/60F
55.85 Degrees API
55.83 Degrees API
0.75454 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7546 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.4 Degrees F
148.5 Degrees F
228 Degrees F
343.5 Degrees F
431.2 Degrees F
1.3 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM ,
MM
Analysis
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/26/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/11/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
8/28/06
7/11/06
7/11/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol byD5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DiPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Page 2 of 2
97.9 mL
0.8 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14662
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/26/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14662 Comments: 57; 07-26-04
550SAT(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
181 Parts Per Million
6.25 PS I
36.8 Volume Percent
79.9 Volume Percent
32.35 Volume Percent
9.6 Volume Percent
1.58 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.09 Volumn Percent
1.57 Volume Percent
32.5 Volume Percent
0.75698 60/60F
0.75692 60/60F
55.44 Degrees API
55.43 Degrees API
0.75623 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75617 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.4 Degrees F
148.6 Degrees F
226.6 Degrees F
336.2 Degrees F
427.9 Degrees F
1 ml
98.2 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/6/06
6/26/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/11/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/11/06
7/11/06
8/28/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14662
Page 2 of 2
0.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-od NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14663
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/26/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14663 Comments: 76; 8-2-04
SIE276(KS)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by 0559*9
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl 319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110
150
190
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
172 Parts Per Million
7.89 PS I
41.4 Volume Percent
80.2 Volume Percent
31.81 Volume Percent
8.7 Volume Percent
1.79 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.2 Volumn Percent
1.8 Volume Percent
31.3 Volume Percent
0.75296 60/60F
0.75286 60/60F
56.45 Degrees API
56.43 Degrees API
0,75221 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75212g/cm-03@60degF
95.8 Degrees F
133.9 Degrees F
220.4 Degrees F
334.8 Degrees F
418.8 Degrees F
1.1 mL
97.7 mL
FueL 21
Code:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/6/06
6/26/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/11/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/11/06
7/11/06
8/28/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.2mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-o6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14664
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/26/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14664 Comments: 99; 8-3-04
750NBW(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
50 Parts Per Million
6.74 PS I
6.74 PS I
39.7 Volume Percent
75.2 Volume Percent
32.18 Volume Percent
8 Volume Percent
8.6 Volume Percent
1.47 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
31.1 Volume Percent
31.5 Volume Percent
1.48 Volume Percent
6 Volumn Percent
0.75462 60/60F
0.75463 60/60F
56.01 Degrees API
56.01 Degrees API
0.75388 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75388 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.7 Degrees F
139.9 Degrees F
225.6 Degrees F
350.7 Degrees F
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis [
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/6/06
6/26/06
6/26/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/11/06
8/28/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
8/28/06
8/28/06
7/11/06
7/11/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-06
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
417 Degrees F
1 mL
97.89999 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14664
Page 2 of 2
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aug-o6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14665
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/26/06.
FTAG: 14665
Kansas City Samples-
116MGP
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBEbyD5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
Comments:
443; 9-30-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
76 Parts Per Million
8.89 PS I
8.88 PS I
47.1 Volume Percent
82.6 Volume Percent
23.79 Volume Percent
9.7 Volume Percent
0.96 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
23.6 Volume Percent
0.96 Volume Percent
5.01 Volumn Percent
0.73774 60/60F
0.7378 60/60F
voc
Season:
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis D
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/6/06
6/26/06
6/26/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
7/11/06
8/28/06
7/5/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
8/28/06
7/11/06
7/11/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
-------
28-Aug-06
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
60.29 Degrees API
60.3 Degrees API
0.73707 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73701 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
92.2 Degrees F
126 Degrees F
206.1 Degrees F
334.7 Degrees F
418.1 Degrees F
1.2mL
97.3 mL
1.5mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14665
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
-------
28-Aud-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14612
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/13/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14612
979GS8(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Comments:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
926; 4-6-05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
63 Parts Per Million
10.23 PS I
34.8 Volume Percent
88.5 Volume Percent
22.03 Volume Percent
3.2 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
20.1 Volume Percent
1.15 Volume Percent
5.76 Volumn Percent
0.7292 60/60F
0.72913 60/60F
62.57 Degrees API
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
8/21/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
-------
28-Aug-06
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol byD5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
62.55 Degrees API
, 0.72848 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72841 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
87.6 Degrees F
126.3 Degrees F
222.6 Degrees F
308.3 Degrees F
391 Degrees F
1.2 ml
97.4 ml
1.4 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percenr
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14612
Page 2 of 2
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/16/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
-------
28-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14628
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples-HD 2 FTAG: 14628 Comments: 41; 7-22-04
voc
Season: Winter
LEW
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
227 Parts Per Million
6.48 PS I
37.1 Volume Percent
81.1 Volume Percent
33.32 Volume Percent
33.29 Volume Percent
8.5 Volume Percent
1.79 Volume Percent
1.80 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.73 Volumn Percent
1.77 Volume Percent
7.69 Volumn Percent
1.77 Volume Percent
32.6 Volume Percent
0.75755 60/60F
0.75748 60/60F
55.3 Degrees API
55.29 Degrees API
0.75673 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.7568 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.2 Degrees F
145 Degrees F
226.9 Degrees F
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report 14628
Page 2 of 2
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
331 Degrees F
410.9 Degrees F
1.1 ml
97.8 mL
1.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Aug-od NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14629
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14629 Comments: 66; 7-27-04
SKI006(KS)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Density @ 60 deg F D4052
Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
691
691
101
110
150
190
10 Percent
50 Percent
90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
15 Parts Per Million
6.19 PS I
27.5 Volume Percent
85.2 Volume Percent
27.84 Volume Percent
2.4 Volume Percent
1.73 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.58 Volumn Percent
1.69 Volume Percent
25.9 Volume Percent
0.74681 60/60F
0.74675 60/60F
57.99 Degrees API
57.97 Degrees API
0.74607 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.74601 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
99.3 Degrees F
159.8 Degrees F
228.9 Degrees F
321.5 Degrees F
403.4 Degrees F
1.1 ml
97.7 mL
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis I
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
8/21 /06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14629
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
1.2 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14630
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14630 Comments: 208; 8-24-04
130RJ3(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
voc
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
165 Parts Per Million
7.08 PS I
38.6 Volume Percent
80.4 Volume Percent
33.35 Volume Percent
10.3 Volume Percent
1.73 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.52 Volumn Percent
32.7 Volume Percent
1.7 Volume Percent
0.7568 60/60F
0.75676 60/60F
55.47 Degrees API
55.48 Degrees API
0.75601 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75605 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
97 Degrees F
140.7 Degrees F
225.4 Degrees F
332.9 Degrees F
413 Degrees F
0.9 ml
98.10001 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
-------
28-Aug-06
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14630
Page 2 of 2
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/21/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14631
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14631 Comments: 221; 8-26-04
052DYF(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
133 Parts Per Million
130 Parts Per Million
6.51 PS I
36.9 Volume Percent
79.2 Volume Percent
29.64 Volume Percent
11.6 Volume Percent
1.28 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
6.18 Volumn Percent
29.9 Volume Percent
1.27 Volume Percent
0.75447 60/60F
0.75438 60/60F
56.05 Degrees API
56.07 Degrees API
0.75363 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75373 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
100.1 Degrees F
146.3 Degrees F
226.4 Degrees F
342.2 Degrees F
439.5 Degrees F
1.1 ml
Fuel_ 21
Code:
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
-------
28-Aug-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14631
Page 2 of 2
97.89999 ml
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Au9-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14632
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14632 Comments: 254; 9-1-04
852HBL(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
153 Parts Per Million
6.21 PS I
35.7 Volume Percent
79.9 Volume Percent
38.24 Volume Percent
8 Volume Percent
2.18 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
8.73 Volumn Percent
38.9 Volume Percent
2.14 Volume Percent
0.76474 60/60F
0.7647 60/60F
53.54 Degrees API
53.53 Degrees API
0.76398 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.76395 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
101.7 Degrees F
148.5 Degrees F
231 Degrees F
332.8 Degrees F
410.8 Degrees F
1 mL
98.3 mL
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/21/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14632
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
0.7 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/21/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Au3-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14633
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14633
TDN989(KS)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
Comments:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
. 56 ETBE by D5599
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
301;9-9-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
61 Parts Per Million
6.63 PS I
37.6 Volume Percent
80.7 Volume Percent
28.29 Volume Percent
11.6 Volume Percent
0.79 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0,00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.78 Volume Percent
28.6 Volume Percent
8.54 Volumn Percent
0.75231 60/60F
0.75227 60/60F
56.59 Degrees API
voc
Season:
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
-------
28-Aug-06
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE byD5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
56.6 Degrees API
0.75157g/cm-03@60degF
0.75153 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.6 Degrees F
145.5 Degrees F
223.8 Degrees F
343.7 Degrees F
429.1 Degrees F
1 mL
98.1 mL
0.9 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14633
Page 2 of 2
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14634
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14634 Comments: 343:9-17-04
309PNM(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FlA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Fuel_ 21
Code:
11.0 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
139 Parts Per Million
6.74 PS I
37.9 Volume Percent
80.5 Volume Percent
34.89 Volume Percent
8.6 Volume Percent
1.89 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
7.84 Volumn Percent
1.86 Volume Percent
35.1 Volume Percent
0.75868 60/60F
0.7586 60/60F
55.03 Degrees API
55.01 Degrees API
0.75793 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75785 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
98.8 Degrees F
143.3 Degrees F
226.7 Degrees F
331.5 Degrees F
414.1 Degrees F
0.9 ml
98.10001 ml
Analys
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis Date
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21 /06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21 /06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14634
Page 2 of 2
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/21/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14635
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14635
615TSB(MO)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
421
421
Comments:
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
557; 1/17/05
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
54 Parts Per Million
52 Parts Per Million
13.36 PS I
43.8 Volume Percent
88.1 Volume Percent
25.48 Volume Percent
3.9 Volume Percent
0.41 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
23.7 Volume Percent
10.55 Volumn Percent
0.4 Volume Percent
0.72749 60/60F
0.72748 60/60F
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/19/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
-------
28-Aug-06
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50-Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
63.01 Degrees API
63.01 Degrees API
0.72677 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72676 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
81.2 Degrees F
102.9 Degrees F
214.3 Degrees F
310.8 Degrees F
395.9 Degrees F
1.1 ml
96.9 ml
2 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14635
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/21/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Aug-o6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14636
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14636 Comments: 606; 1-27-05
SJ495(KS)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
630 Toluene in gasoline byMSDD5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 ' Density® 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
89 Parts Per Million
13.55 PS I
46.5 Volume Percent
46.5 Volume Percent
85.9 Volume Percent
85.8 Volume Percent
23.54 Volume Percent
6.7 Volume Percent
0.73 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
22.9 Volume Percent
7.75 Volumn Percent
0.72 Volume Percent
0.7289 60/60F
0.72888 60/60F
62.63 Degrees API
62.63 Degrees API
0.72816 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72818 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
80.4 Degrees F
80.3 Degrees F
102.2 Degrees F
101.8 Degrees F
208.7 Degrees F
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
Analysis Date
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
8/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Aug-06
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
200 End Point
201 Residue
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DiPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
208.4 Degrees F
321.5 Degrees F
322.2 Degrees F
416.7 Degrees F
409.6 Degrees F
0.9 mL
1.2 mL
97 mL
97 mL
1.8mL
2.1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
14636
Page 2 of 2
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14637
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14637 Comments: 608; 1-27-05
154FFB(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
VOC
Season: Winter
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA Dl319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
103 Parts Per Million
14.49 PS I
50.2 Volume Percent
83.7 Volume Percent
21.86 Volume Percent
10 Volume Percent
1.00 Volume Percent
0.07 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.24 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
4.94 Volumn Percent
0.99 Volume Percent
19.8 Volume Percent
0.72618 60/60F
0.72617 60/60F
63.36 Degrees API
63.36 Degrees API
0.72546 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72546 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
79.4 Degrees F
98.6 Degrees F
199.5 Degrees F
330.3 Degrees F
443.3 Degrees F
1.2 ml
97 ml
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14637
Page 2 of 2
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanoi
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.8mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.24 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch*
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14638
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14638 Comments: 646; 2-5-05
066RHM(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol byD5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
VOC
Season: Winter
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
215 Parts Per Million
13.2 PS I
50.7 Volume Percent
84.4 Volume Percent
23.75 Volume Percent
10.5 Volume Percent
1.20 Volume Percent
1.20 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.38 Volumn Percent
21.9 Volume Percent
1.18 Volume Percent
0.7288 60/60F
0.72881 60/60F
62.65 Degrees API
62.65 Degrees API
0.72809 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.72808 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
83.7 Degrees F
103.6 Degrees F
198.1 Degrees F
323.2 Degrees F
399.5 Degrees F
1.1 mL
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Aug-06
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol byD5599
586 n-Propanol by D5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14638
97.2 mL
1.7 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aud-°6 NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone:(913)299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14639
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14639 Comments: 660; 2-7-05
697PAX(MO)
Test Test Method Results Units
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
46 Aromatics by FIA D1319
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
VOC
Season: Winter
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
202 Total Recovery D86
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
237 Parts Per Million
12.15 PSI
48 Volume Percent
83.1 Volume Percent
25.65 Volume Percent
10.3 Volume Percent
1.31 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.64 Volumn Percent
1.29 Volume Percent
24.5 Volume Percent
0.73581 60/60F
0.73582 60/60F
60.8 Degrees API
60.81 Degrees API
0.73508 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.73509 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
85.3 Degrees F
108.9 Degrees F
204.9 Degrees F
327.4 Degrees F
401.1 Degrees F
1.1 mL
97.1 mL
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RGG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
TW
RCG
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14639
Page 2 of 2
203 Loss
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
589 Isobutanol
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol
5802 n-Butanol
by D5599
by D5599
1.8 ml
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14640
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/19/06.
Kansas City Samples- FTAG: 14640 Comments: 671; 2-9-05
SLE053(KS)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
534 Ethanol by D5599
572 TAME by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin byFIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME byD5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
46 Aromatics byFIA D1319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent D86
150 50 Percent D86
190 90 Percent D86
200 End Point D86
201 Residue D86
VOC
Season: Winter
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
245 Parts Per Million
13.56 PS I
13.58 PS I
50.4 Volume Percent
84.1 Volume Percent
23.79 Volume Percent
11.2 Volume Percent
1.20 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
5.42 Volumn Percent
21.8 Volume Percent
1.17 Volume Percent
0.72941 60/60F
0.72944 60/60F
62.48 Degrees API
62.49 Degrees API
0.72869 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0,72872 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
82.7 Degrees F
103.3 Degrees F
198.9 Degrees F
323.5 Degrees F
405.6 Degrees F
1 ml_
FueL 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
NST
MM
.MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TW
RCG
TW
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
Analysis
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/19/06
6/19/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/22/06
8/22/06
6/22/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/20/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/22/06
-------
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14640
202 Total Recovery D86
203 Loss D86
543 Methanol by D5599
584 Isopropanol by D5599
585 t-Butanol by D5599
586 n-Propanol byD5599
587 sec-Butanol by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
97.2 ml
1.8 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
Page 2 of 2
6/22/06
6/22/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
28-Aug-os NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
Kansas City Samples Batch#
Facility Name: ERG Facility Type: In House
Owner: EPA Phone: (913) 299-9480
6636 Berger Avenue
14646
U.S.
Page 1 of 2
Samples Type: Correlation
Inspection information logged in by MM on 6/23/06.
FTAG: 14646 Comments:
Kansas City Samples-
293RAY(Mo)
Test Test Method
Code
552 MTBE by D5599
552 MTBE by D5599
562 ETBE by D5599
562 ETBE
534 Ethanol
534 Ethanol
572 TAME
572 TAME
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
421 Sulfur in Gasoline D2622
62 Vapor Pressure by D5191 (Modified)
65 Percent Evaporated at 200 Degrees F D86
66 Percent Evaporated at 300 Degrees F D86
48 Aromatics in Gasoline MSD D5769
49 Olefinsin by FIA D1319
64 Benzene in Gasoline D3606
532 Ethanol byD5599
55 MTBE by D5599
55 MTBE by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
532 Ethanol by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
57 TAME by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
59 Weight Percent Oxygen by D5599
593 Volume Percent Oxygenates by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
56 ETBE by D5599
46 Aromatics by FIA Dl319
63 Benzene in Gasoline by GC/MSD D5769
630 Toluene in gasoline by MSD D5769
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
69 Specific Gravity @ 60 deg F D4052
692 Degrees API D4052
74; 7-29-04
Results Units
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
0.00 Oxy Percent
114 Parts Per Million
6.41 PS I
36.9 Volume Percent
79.7 Volume Percent
29.91 Volume Percent
11.1 Volume Percent
1.38 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Weight Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
29.2 Volume Percent
1.36 Volume Percent
6.83 Volumn Percent
0.75394 60/60F
0.75396 60/60F
56.18 Degrees API
voc
Season:
Fuel_ 21 Analys
Code:
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
NST
NST
MM
MM
TW
RCG
TW
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
RCG
TW
TW
MM
MM
MM
Winter
Analysis Date
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/27/06
6/26/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/29/06
8/23/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
8/23/06
6/29/06
6/29/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
-------
28-Aug-06
NVFEL Fuel Analysis Report
14646
Page 2 of 2
692 Degrees API D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
691 Density @ 60 deg F D4052
101 Initial Boiling Point D86
110 10 Percent
150 50 Percent
190 90 Percent
200 End Point
201 Residue
202 Total Recovery
203 Loss
543 Methanol
543 Methanol
584 Isopropanol
584 Isopropanol
585 t-Butanol
585 t-Butanol
586 n-Propanol
586 n-Propanol
587 sec-Butanol
587 sec-Butanol
588 DIPE
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
by D5599
588 DIPE by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
589 Isobutanol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5801 t-Amyl Alcohol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
5802 n-Butanol by D5599
56.18 Degrees API
0.75322 g/cm-03 @ 60 deg F
0.75319g/cm-03@60degF
100.7 Degrees F
147 Degrees F
226.4 Degrees F
341.4 Degrees F
431.9 Degrees F
1 mL
98 mL
1 mL
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
0.00 Volume Percent
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
TS
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/27/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
6/28/06
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix GG
Round 1 Gravimetric vs
Quartz Crystal Microbalance
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
File No QCM Bag1 QCM Bag2 QCM Bag3 QCM FTP i Grav Bag1 Grav Bag2 Grav Bag3 Grav Comf Bin No. Assigned Bin
84037 40.07 41.61 7.58 39.18 11.7 9.5 2.37 9.12 1 A.Truck-Pre 1981
84154 83.98 59.69 37.57 59.44 163.2 80.5 15.2 80.3 1 A.Truck-Pre 1981
Average 62.025 50.65 22.575 49.31 87.45 45 8.785 44.71
Std. Dev. 31.04906 12.78449 21.20613 14.32598 107.1267 50.20458 9.07218 50.33186
84048
84074
84145
84146
84189
84201
84216
84248
84256
84263
84278
84283
84336
84354
84373
Average
Std.
Dev.
84054
84064
84066
84067
84073
84094
84119
84125
84132
84137
84138
84144
84196
84206
84268
84281
84287
84302
84315
Average
Std.
Dev.
236.6
27.2
13.8
16.17
42.64
5.45
9.96
46.03
34.6
17.05
30.38
50.93
44.23417
62.34937
3.72
12.47
8.31
13.58
16.58
13.04
26.99
9.38
16.64
17.68
17.58
22.16
1.02
8.54
27.26
9.44
97.26
18.92059
21.4384
9.68
8.68
2.43
12.75
20.87
18.84
21.11
16.03
7.02
30.92
42.66
9.84
16.73583
11.24754
5.13
2.79
8.97
4.94
7
4.81
19.43
6.63
4.16
5.58
6.68
2.76
0.72
3.84
9.12
12.42
32.56
8.090588
7.63763
50.14
5.9
7.38
8.82
28.06
-0.4
5.41
12.57
31.84
9.71
32.46
14.5
17.19917
15.00945
3.07
2.65
7.18
6.24
5.68
9.56
20.97
5.5
11.33
45.02
3.23
5.39
0.38
1.8
0.64
8.48
65.02
1 1 .89059
17.31145
24.21
9.46
3.36
12.65
22.51
16.86
19.38
17.4
10.14
28.51
41.33
12.38
18.1825
10.11778
4.91
3.28
8.81
5.47
7.41
5.55
19.93
6.69
5.31
8.93
7.02
3.94
0.72
3.95
9.48
11.99
38.05
8.908235
8.628843
239.36
21.74
3.43
6.59
28.19
4.55
5.85
47.94
40.07
9.55
12.39
59.97
39.96917
65.53638
7.34
2.71
2.27
4.15
6.07
1.5
-2.65
2.43
15.01
5.94
11.11
19.74
1.15
2.9
9.02
6.95
105.61
1 1 .83824
24.77363
47.14
5.96
1.14
10.18
1.01
14.5
15.97
4.16
10.42
11.44
25.27
6.13
12.77667
12.80245
1.19
0.45
7
1.73
2.98
2.06
7.15
3.6
3.55
4.53
5.32
6.72
3.94
1.22
10.35
7.04
56.09
7.348235
12.8434
89.03
0.45
1.16
-2.15
147.53
1.57
6.44
0.61
3.05
0.35
12.61
-3.35
21.44167
47.10206
16.41
-0.75
1.52
1.76
0.88
1.38
-0.83
1.39
6.19
1.83
2.15
-0.42
64.29
1.32
3.61
6.47
86.42
1 1 .38941
24.72355
59.98
6.41
1.26
9.16
12.49
13.13
14.75
6.26
11.43
10.44
23.73
8.37
14.78417
15.25325
2.56
0.48
6.37
1.86
3
1.98
6.1
3.39
4.33
4.41
5.41
6.9
8.01
1.31
9.81
7
60.67
7.858235
13.85121
2 B.Truck-1 981 -1990
2 B.Truck-1 981 -1990
2 B.Truck-1 981 -1990
2 B.Truck-1 981 -1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
2 B.Truck-1981-1990
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
3 C.Truck-1 991 -1995
QC Code Comment
VQ;2
FD;1 Stalled at start of Z1
VQ;2,4
VQ;2
VQ;2
Tunnel heater off
FQ;3 DUPLICATE
FQPAD Engine skiping on accel.
VQ;2
VQ;2
-------
File No QCM Bag1 QCM Bag2 QCM Bag3 QCM FTP i Grav Bag1 Grav Bag2 Grav Bag3 Grav Comf Bin No. Assigned Bin
84034
84035
84039
84055
84056
84069
84072
84086
84096
84098
84104
84109
84111
84116
84122
84127
84140
84150
84153
84167
84179
84192
84193
84204
84205
84223
84229
84242
84286
84298
84303
84310
84329
84337
84339
84343
84344
84349
84375
84376
Average
Std. Dev.
84076
84188
84271
84277
84309
84367
Average
1.35
2.44
11.13
10.95
2.45
9.97
4.31
4.31
9.62
10.68
10.1
12.82
9.49
8.14
7.54
0.12
0.24
32.81
6.8
14.9
29.8
25.15
6.11
23.94
4.46
18.86
12.66
58.85
14.14
31.96
13.20333
12.52145
86.68
538.87
48.17
223.24
117.84
202.96
1.18
2.34
5.15
8.45
2.26
2.24
4.52
0.67
2.58
1.94
3.95
3.45
1.75
1.75
7
-0.14
0.14
12.5
1.82
13.31
7.22
9.23
5.1
5.31
4.38
6.75
1.3
5.98
4.89
8.74
4.525333
3.450489
3.92
6.56
2.46
40.51
22.33
15.156
1.46
0.45
4.87
11.39
0.44
1.86
0.43
1.03
0.5
3.38
2.22
3.88
0.55
0.94
6.24
0.24
0.33
3.43
3.09
2.21
4.38
18.46
3.18
1.25
2.46
6.75
2.5
6.67
3.87
4.61
3.435667
3.782561
25.46
45.72
7.74
68.96
18
33.176
1.21
2.22
5.45
8.78
2.15
2.62
4.22
0.89
2.8
2.49
4.15
3.96
2.07
2.02
6.98
-0.1
0.16
12.92
2.17
12.62
8.21
10.66
5.02
6
4.25
7.39
1.97
8.83
5.31
9.64
4.902
3.597116
9.6
37.9
5.16
51.91
26.88
26.29
9.08
6.14
7.65
4.9
2.11
2.13
2.57
2.88
3.55
3.17
47.55
2.96
5.05
5.64
2.04
0.13
8.73
15.85
5.5
4.15
14.3
4.33
2.84
13.14
0.09
7.43
5.45
15.16
2.8
13.88
7.373333
8.795765
56.41
326.23
57.2
134.01
138
142.37
2.16
6.25
2.36
4.62
1.42
0.43
1.52
0.31
1.5
1.03
1.76
1.77
1.65
0.67
1.84
5.87
5.86
8.58
0.77
7.05
1.35
2.63
2.4
5.84
0.38
3.45
1.09
2.36
0.83
5.24
2.766333
2.274557
14.47
25.61
2.78
40.2
89.06
34.424
4.06
0.82
2
7
0.34
-0.03
0.86
1.35
0.73
-0.05
0.87
1.1
0.66
0.06
2.42
-0.17
2.26
1.07
-1.05
2.63
-0.52
3.83
2.84
0.92
-0.18
1.97
0.23
-0.13
-0.6
-0.07
1.174
1 .689566
5.73
9.46
3.12
16.79
144.55
35.93
2.65
5.86
2.61
4.8
1.39
0.49
1.53
0.51
1.56
1.07
4.07
1.79
1.76
0.89
1.89
5.17
5.76
8.44
0.89
6.59
1.9
2.8
2.45
5.88
0.32
3.56
1.25
2.86
0.84
5.3
2.896
2.148722
15.99
40.64
5.66
43.42
95.34
40.21
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
4 D.Truck-1996-Newer
5 E.Car-Pre 1981
5 E.Car-Pre 1981
5 E.Car-Pre 1981
5 E.Car-Pre 1981
5 E.Car-Pre 1981
5 E.Car-Pre 1981
QC Code Comment
FDP
Rattling catalyst possibly bad
Zero drift on torque readout
VQ;3 Traction control was engaged
VQ;2
DUPLICATE
DUPLICATE
VQ;2
VQ;2
VQ;2
FQ;2 VQ;3 Dyno malfunction
VQ;2
VQ;2
FD;2,3,4?
VQ;2
Stalled at start of Z1
VQ;2
Std. Dev. 198.7292 16.24514 24.36537 19.4715 110.155 33.52479 60.93817 34.74952
-------
File No QCM Bag1 QCM Bag2 QCM Bag3 QCM FTP i Grav Bag1 Grav Bag2 Grav Bag3 Grav Comf Bin No. Assigned Bin
QC Code Comment
84040
84052
84071
84079
84107
84120
84123
84126
84141
84159
84162
84171
84172
84175
84180
84197
84208
84210
84211
84213
84221
84233
84235
84238
84239
84245
84250
84257
84261
84265
84267
84270
84276
84284
84289
84293
84295
84300
84301
84311
84314
84322
84334
84335
84366
84386
Average
Std. Dev.
11.05
32.71
40.1
3.38
10.8
17.96
25.42
23.51
26.77
37.22
10.52
216.41
46.2
12.21
51.8
21.64
41.06
16.09
10.45
21.91
22.82
23.68
20.79
13.44
55.73
17.01
23.07
15.15
11.85
152.34
14.89
10.21
29.27
32.95333
41.83713
11.54
9.06
2.04
2.57
5.93
3.32
43.79
7.67
2.26
5.41
2.99
13.39
7.61
6.22
12.57
7.61
43.22
5.3
79.87
9.25
6.38
8.25
5.15
24.64
293.03
8.64
13.54
11.14
9.62
98.46
3.09
21.57
2.73
23.87455
52.91356
5.63
29.45
0.18
-0.46
4.66
2.7
8.42
2.75
6.86
8.12
2.96
63.74
11.62
2.8
12.01
8.94
29.01
4.97
28.37
12.76
8.31
6.6
2.63
23.49
193.28
6.17
19.44
10.08
3.58
57.74
3.18
10.02
9.98
18.18152
34.72499
11.11
11.7
3.86
2.41
6.09
4.02
40.42
8.16
3.86
7.23
3.38
27.4
9.8
6.3
14.57
8.42
42.12
5.83
72.69
10.15
7.36
8.94
5.79
23.97
274.02
8.9
14.43
11.27
9.32
98.46
3.73
20.17
4.37
23.94697
49.37687
2.35
72.47
286.41
2.92
9.56
14.43
14.94
26.91
20.35
25.73
3.46
209.33
101.5
14.04
27.45
34.33
29.48
5.47
5.57
-1.5
9.36
14.15
13.36
20.16
51.6
6.42
12.58
11.32
7.62
113.25
6.58
4.42
21.08
36.27576
61 .40097
4.93
34.86
19.69
5.8
2.56
11.38
27.89
13.56
2.88
8.93
0.7
42.73
7.24
34.89
10.99
5.74
44.96
11.43
54.38
4.46
3.26
26.59
1.26
79.97
181.75
0.85
9.86
3.44
10.47
99
5.71
7.61
1.34
23.67
36.65589
4.87
58.32
6.22
3
2.07
3.61
2.63
2.07
0.64
1.26
1.29
86.8
8.46
7.12
2.55
7.5
8.74
0.85
6.22
3.44
2.51
4.86
1.18
14.95
15.14
2.12
4.96
1
4.51
16.48
0.9
0.33
4.25
8.813636
17.3325
4.79
38.43
32.43
5.47
2.89
11
25.49
13.47
3.64
9.26
0.89
54.42
12.01
31.9
11.26
7.31
41.64
10.4
48.49
4.08
3.52
24.44
1.89
72.28
163.67
1.23
9.66
3.68
9.91
94.05
5.42
6.94
2.38
23.28303
33.5535
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1 981 -1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
6 F.Car-1981-1990
VQ;2
VD;2,4
VQ;1,2
VQ;2
AC switch broken
DUPLICATE
FPA;2,3,4 I Torque not recorded
DUPLICATE
VQ;2
FS
VQ;2
VQ;2
FQ;2,3,4
VQ;2
VQ;2
Stalled twice in Z2
Hard cold start
Shut off twice during initial idle
VQ;2
FQPAD
VQ;2
FS
FD;2
Stalled in Z1
Stalled inZ1
would not go into gear for Z1
-------
File No QCM Bag1 QCM Bag2 QCM Bag3 QCM FTP i Grav Bag1 Grav Bag2 Grav Bag3 Grav Comf Bin No. Assigned Bin
84036
84043
84091
84101
84108
84110
84113
84115
84135
84148
84157
84165
84166
84169
84174
84182
84198
84200
84214
84215
84219
84220
84228
84230
84231
84234
84236
84244
84246
84254
84258
84262
84274
84307
84308
84312
84342
84347
84353
84357
84359
84365
84370
84372
84380
84381
Average
Std. Dev.
5.27
11.33
10.76
22.7
11.64
24.18
47.1
36.72
6.9
9.45
8.83
13.06
19.87
47.49
-2.15
11.43
18.28
8.96
11.18
7.73
15.83
19.41
23.16
15.04
12.61
30.06
12.44
19.4
13.03
14.02
11.79
12.87
11.25
14.45
13.47
16.74
15.95
16.27703
10.20265
2.86
6.11
-1.69
5.8
-0.65
-1.84
14.45
8.28
-0.11
4.49
6.2
5.92
1.54
15.14
7.27
5.11
6.99
4.7
4.21
4.78
7.03
22.51
1.27
18.55
6.45
8.19
3.48
7.67
6.54
2.66
8.86
18.65
13.15
7.18
3.36
2.88
18.64
6.935946
5.888016
2.36
7.83
0.26
6.07
6.49
-0.69
19.74
18.06
1.77
4.26
3.65
6.24
-0.21
4.53
4.43
14.46
8.05
0.38
1.11
6.05
13.61
17.42
-0.13
16.71
-4.66
15.12
1.91
8.93
9.76
2.47
0.83
14.96
7.45
3.8
5.78
2.54
28.25
7.015946
7.074836
2.95
6.5
-0.91
6.7
0.46
-0.44
16.52
10.42
0.37
4.72
6.16
6.31
2.38
16.03
6.58
6.07
7.65
4.62
4.36
5.02
7.93
22
2.3
17.89
6.01
9.8
3.83
8.36
7.1
3.25
8.45
18.09
12.66
7.32
4.05
3.59
19.17
7.412703
5.705035
6.42
5.7
1.34
37.87
11.39
16.16
51.67
30.35
1.9
0.49
4.16
25.13
8.94
21.13
2.95
7.58
28.14
7.5
11.18
4.06
1.32
7.93
38.13
4.19
6.77
7.16
6.46
6.73
1.15
2.28
9.41
5.8
4.97
3.64
2.16
-1.59
9.42
10.81054
12.23035
1.6
3.54
0.93
9.05
2.73
1.34
47.56
19.9
0.35
0.12
4.12
11.45
1.76
6.23
3.96
9.34
3.71
3.07
5.17
1.45
1.84
24.55
23.68
2.07
5.02
3.27
1.37
3.93
0.83
0.19
5.46
8.26
5.67
3.5
0.69
0.38
32.32
7.038108
10.12428
0.55
0.66
1.21
2.86
-0.4
2.5
25.42
3.78
2.94
-1.23
-0.98
9.27
0.87
2
1.38
0.73
1.98
2.18
0.66
2.78
1.21
1.17
9.76
0.96
0.41
1.04
1.29
1.65
2.4
-0.29
3
5.2
-0.48
2.77
-1.43
-0.66
37.6
3.371892
7.356661
1.78
3.45
0.97
10.12
2.96
2.17
46.24
19.33
0.6
0.04
3.76
12
2.07
6.69
3.73
8.66
4.85
3.24
5.17
1.67
1.77
22.08
23.46
2.26
4.8
3.32
1.62
3.91
0.96
0.27
5.49
7.91
5.2
3.46
0.62
0.2
31.49
6.981622
9.751139
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
7 G.Car-1991-1995
QC Code Comment
FA
VQ;2
VQ;2
VQ;2 DUPLICATE
VQ;4VD;2,3,4
DUPLICATE
VQ;1,2FS DUPLICATE
FQ;1 Late crank, -20 sec.
FQ;2
VQ;2 Stalled once
VQ;2
Cut off during first 10 sec. of Z1
DUPLICATE
DUPLICATE
VQ;2
FS FTA SPEED/TORQUE
VQ;2
-------
File No QCM Bag1 QCM Bag2 QCM Bag3 QCM FTP i Grav Bag1 Grav Bag2 Grav Bag3 Grav Comf Bin No. Assigned Bin
84032
84042
84047
84050
84051
84057
84058
84060
84061
84062
84063
84068
84077
84078
84082
84083
84084
84087
84088
84090
84092
84093
84097
84099
84102
84103
84105
84121
84128
84129
84131
84133
84134
84139
84149
84151
84155
84156
84160
84161
84168
84173
84178
84183
84184
84185
84191
0.87
17.2
7.58
3.53
5.61
2.94
9.37
1.73
7.1
3.56
3.09
5.08
3.78
2.69
4.9
3.66
20.54
4.14
4.84
3.6
7.31
7.32
36.14
7.15
7.55
17.77
4.87
9.77
5.57
6.84
11.93
2.78
9.28
22.72
4.77
19.73
4.8
10.32
1.97
0.62
2.86
1.25
3.05
4.26
3.06
0.84
3.97
3.51
3.28
3.28
2.42
3.97
2.22
2
1.71
1.04
1.84
0.48
1.48
1.05
1
0.98
2.58
0.17
2.01
0.32
1.83
2.57
0.96
2.57
1.61
1.12
0.99
1.65
0.71
3.08
8.37
2.96
0.82
1.15
0.17
1.81
2.25
0.98
0.71
2.25
4.13
3.23
0.13
1.39
1.4
-0.19
0.12
-0.05
-0.24
1.67
1.55
1.17
2.97
0.33
1.85
3.19
0.71
3.84
0.1
0.52
0.81
-0.85
0.36
1.33
0.17
1.49
2.8
2.07
0.15
-1.78
0.49
0.65
3.46
1.51
2.99
4.19
2.91
1.27
3.73
3.74
3.29
3.05
2.49
3.79
2.08
2.02
1.69
1.96
1.94
0.78
1.57
1.51
1.29
2.83
2.86
0.59
2.95
0.54
2.15
2.6
1.14
2.91
1.65
1.48
2.16
1.89
1.79
2.97
111
2.75
15.65
15.18
9.48
1.58
0.37
1.82
1.62
1.29
4.46
2.41
2.51
2.63
-0.16
3.52
4.02
0.49
11.09
1.81
4.06
2.47
3.09
3.9
14.72
2.5
2.04
4.7
0.08
10.09
1.68
2.92
6.08
1.13
4.46
7.75
1.94
16.6
8.56
3.65
5.99
1.59
1.78
1.07
1.51
0.52
1.12
1.04
1.04
1.32
1.01
0.2
0.73
0.48
0.69
0.59
0.64
1.27
1.17
0.48
1.24
1.16
0.42
2.74
0.54
0.3
1.01
0.73
2.18
2.3
0.66
1.86
0.68
1.66
0.19
0.72
0.75
1.88
3.34
5.81
4.47
3.06
0.37
6.22
0.75
0.64
0.23
1.41
3.2
0.19
0.7
0.79
2.93
0.56
0.61
0.31
1.43
-0.25
2.12
0.87
2.26
1.43
0.47
0.1
0.67
-0.21
0.07
0.21
1.24
0.23
0.67
2.25
-1.22
-2.14
-0.19
0.26
-0.17
2.58
2.63
1.64
1.43
0.9
1.13
1.04
0.99
1.49
1.24
0.32
0.82
0.47
0.98
0.77
0.63
1.71
1.22
0.61
1.37
1.24
0.73
3.26
0.63
0.38
1.18
0.63
2.45
2.13
0.82
1.97
0.06
0.88
2.02
0.19
1.35
1.09
1.86
3.24
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
7 G.Car-1 991 -1995
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
8 H.Car-1996-Newer
QC Code
FDP
VQ;2
FQ;2
VQ;2
VQ;2
VQ;3 VD
VQ;1, 2,3,4
VQ;1 FQ;2
VQ;2,4
VQ;3
Engine stalled several times
Coolant on dyno after testing
DUPLICATE
Exhaust leaks
-------
File No QCM Bag1 QCM Bag2 QCM Bag3 QCM FTP i Grav Bag1 Grav Bag2 Grav Bag3 Grav Comf Bin No.
84195
84209
84224
84225
84227
84240
84241
84252
84266
84272
84279
84280
84285
84291
84292
84296
84297
84304
84305
84316
84317
84318
84319
84321
84323
84324
84325
84327
84328
84330
84331
84332
84338
84341
84345
84350
84351
84355
84356
84361
84362
84363
84368
84369
84377
84379
84382
84383
84384
Average
Std. Dev.
-0.45
8.66
5.73
8.38
10.42
13.35
16.72
19.28
13.23
8.68
6.87
14.86
24.21
150.41
12.81
21.62
6.27
6.03
21.62
71.57
12.75
4.66
23.19
52.44
7.55
19.01
17.57
9.02
18.8
8.22
23.91
13.47
11.28
10.51
6.53
8.96
119.89
12.17
5.01
11.02
11.88
12.17
53.51
14.97793
22.45523
-0.2
5.51
3
2.47
2.87
7.46
-0.32
2.47
2.56
3.85
2.96
3.84
3.77
14.95
1.14
4.86
5.36
3.79
21.31
9.63
4.13
1.45
2.5
3.26
3.94
2.3
0.66
1.37
5.35
2.56
4.63
2.44
1.95
4.51
0.59
2.38
21.02
0.77
3.18
4.08
3.16
2.46
5.79
3.285732
3.623911
-0.38
4.55
2.4
2.75
3.09
4.62
0.34
2.3
2.73
2.3
1.97
1.71
5.48
13
-1.94
5.81
2.78
3.5
22.79
7.81
3.97
2.15
0.58
5.41
4.99
3.32
1.22
0.81
3.66
2.64
3.56
3.16
4.63
3.99
2.58
5.18
32
2.55
2.05
6.54
2.9
4.01
8.23
2.960244
4.573243
-0.22
5.61
3.1
2.8
3.28
7.57
0.62
3.34
3.12
3.99
3.09
4.26
4.95
21.83
1.53
5.79
5.22
3.89
21.43
12.66
4.57
1.66
3.43
5.98
4.2
3.23
1.57
1.74
5.92
2.86
5.57
3.06
2.62
4.79
1.04
2.92
26.89
1.49
3.2
4.6
3.58
3.08
8.48
3.869268
4.328042
1.8
3.53
0.93
1.66
2.78
6.91
8.12
5.38
6.41
3.14
2.91
6
7.14
61.62
6.66
3.53
2.77
1.6
52.54
12.13
2.89
2.1
7.52
13.83
2.22
2.42
9.05
2.41
3.29
2.71
17.96
0.17
0.62
2.05
0.54
0.88
42.59
16.78
2.67
2.39
1.29
1.82
16.71
6.593293
10.13502
0.35
2.12
0.42
0.8
1.55
0.97
0.41
2.11
1.63
4.92
0.87
1.85
5.37
9.12
2.93
1.71
2.16
1.25
51.07
3.9
1.37
1.19
2.99
2.46
0.46
0.35
1.18
0.37
2.37
0.9
2.49
0.39
0.32
0.98
0.49
0.07
5.41
2.86
0.49
1.51
1.02
0.79
3.06
2.119012
5.684796
1.29
-1.93
-0.14
-0.78
4.24
-0.52
-1.27
0.89
1.71
3.12
1.09
-0.19
4.05
1.43
1.04
-0.2
0.49
0.59
27.77
0.12
0.22
3.27
0.54
1.94
0.1
-0.67
-0.59
-0.01
-0.16
-1.16
65.53
-0.41
1.86
1.3
0.38
-0.84
1.76
1.69
-3.04
1.97
1.66
1.34
-0.05
1 .997284
7.908866
0.49
1.92
0.41
0.74
1.8
1.18
0.69
2.19
1.89
4.71
1
1.92
5.37
11.31
2.99
1.68
2.07
1.22
49.53
4.06
1.37
1.38
3.05
3.02
0.53
0.39
1.47
0.45
2.24
0.85
7.65
0.33
0.44
1.06
0.49
0.05
7.09
3.52
0.36
1.59
1.08
0.88
3.56
2.318293
5.563265
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Assigned Bin
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
H.Car-1996-Newer
QC Code (
FQPAD
FA; PA
FD
(
FQ;4 NAN?
(
(
VQ;2
VQ;2
[
[
[
[
VQ;2
PAFA
VQ;2
FDR
VQ;1,2
Stalled 230 sec.into Z1
Stalled in Z1 -200 sec.
Car smoking heavily at startup
DUPLICATE
DUPLICATE
DUPLICATE
DUPLICATE
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix HH
Round 2 Gravimetric vs
Quartz Crystal Microbalance
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
FileNo QCM Bag1 QCM Bag2 QCM Bag3 QCM FTPIGravBagl Grav Bag2 Grav Bag3 Grav Comp Model Yearmodel Vehicle Typ odometer stratum replicate? QC Code Comment
84397
84413
84653
84680
84687
84700
84732
84752
84758
Ave.
Std Dev.
84462
84467
84469
84477
84489
84492
84623
84626
84627
84632
84634
84648
84650
84656
84658
84660
84665
84666
84667
84673
84676
84679
84683
84685
84686
84693
84694
84696
84701
84702
84703
84709
84715
84720
84726
Ave.
Std Dev.
162.07
99.22
488.02
227.79
40.9
24.4
5.77
64.17
139.0425
159.4275
226.55
80.7
595.45
253.55
42.68
70.33
47.92
153.22
158.01
111.43
36.46
41.42
14.26
43.97
519.44
37.23
43.5
74.7
26.38
42.15
20.47
15.5
97.64
16.16
76.95
199.84
6.35
31.96
24.87
20.74
275.22
54.34
2.74
104.913
137.7096
56.25
143.51
49.78
-1.89
50.33
9.4
6.37
4.55
39.7875
48.19483
13.08
18.51
69.39
32.08
25.7
34.3
17.32
86.9
88.87
7.5
16.01
11.22
4.54
3.08
97.9
12.02
7.55
7.37
5.08
3.88
12.47
64.08
-0.35
5.65
-1.61
18.28
8.99
1.39
3.03
2.73
-3.08
8.34
5.27
20.83303
27.84338
65.19
24.65
27.75
9
18.22
18.14
5.05
10.16
22.27
19.01336
42.99
11.79
127.73
25.17
11.19
13.78
8.76
68.12
54.11
22.16
13.44
10.76
7.51
-4.24
100.84
18.97
15.02
16.04
4.34
3.54
7
15.52
18.28
8.72
28.27
7.41
3.29
4.73
6.88
9.3
10.72
6.17
6.84
21.36818
28.31384
62.31
133.29
72
11.23
47.55
10.79
6.25
8.09
43.93875
44.71481
26.4
21.25
100.92
43.08
25.58
34.78
18.39
88.93
90.17
13.9
16.9
12.73
5.25
4.95
119.31
13.87
10.03
11.33
6.19
5.82
12.52
58.25
6.42
6.41
4.3
26.97
8.44
3.21
4.46
4.12
12.67
10.55
5.24
25.25273
30.92508
212.5
66.55
595.57
332.21
57.92
13.28
4.9
100.98
172.9888
203.1901
350.55
83.28
701.87
320.83
33.31
155.01
180.85
199.37
164.9
158.59
43.37
33.87
26.57
92.68
717.1
65.44
44.44
76.48
25.57
72.66
14.38
11.5
281.96
15.68
251.79
371.73
12.51
108.3
37.37
15.14
517.14
94.26
12.65
160.3379
189.0099
71.45
154.46
89.16
16.49
73.77
7.37
6.78
12.85
54.04125
52.818
21.88
21
105.05
64.22
14.94
21
11.16
242.55
98.61
15.51
39.15
6.46
7.12
1.3
127.83
7.21
11.29
9.28
8.24
4.34
9.07
73.85
12.37
5.29
15.92
35.68
12.06
3.06
10.3
2.78
35.17
5.32
2.42
32.16455
49.56868
95.79
18.26
14.55
3.39
17.41
8.62
2.34
0.89
20.15625
31.31825
5.92
7.87
140.2
17.88
7.49
6.8
-0.49
125.61
57.38
18.7
6.84
3.21
3.26
1.57
119.87
2.69
6.4
5.59
2.53
4.45
6.53
5.79
10.97
2.44
5.16
14.42
5.05
3.18
2.38
1.94
13.32
0.92
1.07
18.69515
36.77111
80.37
140.81
111.44
32.49
68.93
7.77
6.38
16.67
58.1075
50.53955
38.05
23.3
138.64
74.3
15.39
27.04
19.58
231.92
99.33
23.15
37.09
7.63
7.84
6.64
156.93
10.03
12.76
12.39
8.77
7.86
9.18
65.97
27.27
5.65
26.67
51.69
11.58
8.52
11.18
3.36
59.2
9.57
2.86
37.91939
51.26138
1975 Silverado 2l truck
1979 F250 truck
1977C-20PU truck
1973 Pu truck
1976 El Camino truck
1978 Pu truck
1979 CJ76 truck
1978 F100PU truck
1979 ClOBeauvi truck
1989 Voyager truck
1988 Ranger Pu truck
1989 Caravan truck
1989 Ram 50 truck
1987 Pu truck
1984 C-10 Silver: truck
1989 Acclaim truck
1987 D100PU truck
1987 F150 Pu truck
1987 F150 Pu truck
1988 Voyager truck
1987 Dakota truck
1990 LuminaApv truck
1990 LuminaApv truck
1989 Astro Lt truck
1988 Caravan truck
1989 4X4 Pu truck
1988 F150PU truck
1982 F250PU truck
1983 Vandura truck
1990 Bronco truck
1983 Pu truck
1990 Ranger truck
1988 F150PU truck
1986 F150PU truck
1988 F150PU truck
1983 C10 Pu truck
1987 Pu truck
1990 F150 truck
1989 G20Van Van
1987 Blazer truck
1989 Ranger Pu truck
1988 B2200PU truck
1989 1500 Pu truck
1990 Aerostar truck
2893
5797
37697
57484
61809
73447
8518
58917
84025
145307
77528
162878
133981
232098
82259
164203
23200
410
428
162874
112838
136313
123632
215908
61439
262316
14075
85513
52728
25202
97635
72976
62947
94737
97172
98799
169293
38803
27435
153398
28864
220307
140678
19648
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
VPA
VG2
VQ,V
FG2
VG1
VDP
VDP
VDP
84627
VG
-------
84424
84425
84436
84458
84459
84465
84468
84487
84497
84509
84510
84519
84524
84527
84531
84554
84566
84570
84584
84591
84600
84618
84620
84621
84640
84649
84689
84730
84734
84768
84770
84771
84772
84774
Ave.
Std Dev.
7.06
76.98
29.19
45.98
32.77
29.73
85.67
30.64
74.07
64.47
125.6
26.09
40.04
67.4
39.44
49.43
11.71
18.22
18.41
26.8
25.8
22.34
11.54
38.46
13.02
19.4
25.4
26.42
49.93
15.49
38.25
26.55828
17.78
19.14
9.35
16.97
14.14
7.32
18.66
30.04
9.23
17.9
23.42
6.75
20.87
16.59
12.01
37.21
11.46
10.32
22.93
18.62
40.61
14.77
23.86
1.9
2.51
1.51
2.98
23.3
33.31
2.92
16.27933
10.30526
0.68
23.77
17.35
8.61
9.44
8.85
12.05
1.44
14.06
14.43
27.13
0.96
3.05
5.52
10.53
23.81
15.98
0.97
10.84
3.26
28.4
5.19
17.31
4.1
4.18
2.73
5.12
7.67
35.7
5.23
10.94533
9.225074
16.06
22.58
10.95
17.84
14.78
8.6
21.79
28.02
13.06
20.13
29.04
7.4
20.65
18.45
13.34
36.92
11.79
10.09
21.83
17.97
39.01
14.45
22.8
3.98
3.19
2.56
4.27
22.33
34.33
3.73
17.06467
9.889951
5.44
90.68
8.93
21.07
12.96
18.83
152.8
22.87
125.84
48.11
129.18
30
30.65
68.02
20.78
108.66
3.99
21.31
6.77
57.28
19.44
17.55
8.18
26.97
35.1
31.95
22.94
26.45
80.49
18.48
42.39067
40.84414
14.8
26.24
3.71
21.18
4.45
4.61
15.82
26.34
8.01
22.36
17.42
3
15.58
16.98
14.29
33.8
0.87
5.09
24.35
22.16
5.71
7.94
4.26
5.6
0.58
4.48
2.65
25.22
44.37
6.07
13.598
10.96547
8.85
5.92
1.92
3.05
1.59
2.73
6.17
1.66
4.02
2.14
13.14
-0.13
1.18
2.14
1.71
20.52
0.41
2.93
0.93
5.48
3.82
3
5.67
2.06
0.39
13.21
1.38
2.25
26.44
1.56
4.871333
6.078263
13.9
28.27
3.87
19.92
4.69
5.22
22.49
24.38
14.09
22.32
23
4.25
15.38
18.6
13.75
36.73
1.01
5.81
21.77
22.82
6.31
8.05
4.56
6.48
2.41
6.56
3.6
23.62
44.99
6.4
14.50833
10.9622
1995 Explorer truck
1995 Grand Cher truck
1995 S10P/U truck
1993 Aerostar Mi truck
1992 Aerostar Mi truck
1994 LuminaAp\- truck
1994 LuminaAp\- truck
1992 B2200 truck
1995 4 Runner truck
1992 Astro truck
1994 Suburban truck
1992 Caravan truck
1995 Pu truck
1995 Ram 1500 I truck
1992 Tracker truck
1992 F50PU truck
1995 Odyssey truck
1994S10PU truck
1995 Pu truck
1993 4Runner truck
1993 Explorer truck
1992 Voyager truck
1992 Ranger truck
1992 Ranger truck
1994 Explorer truck
1995 Sonoma Pu truck
1992 Jimmy truck
1995 S10 Pu truck
1993 Voyager truck
1995 F150 truck
1995 F250 truck
1994 Astrovan truck
1992 Caravan truck
1995 Caravan truck
162634
179121
124976
147319
164560
124172
124200
101090
85898
217165
187410
213493
87225
93425
48704
134791
109044
63902
86705
178462
47980
154297
19758
13586
98974
56578
90871
75640
166916
147342
52586
133318
143971
136837
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
RDM,VG2
RDM
RDM DOUBLE RUN?
VG2
VDP
VDP
VDP
VG2,3
-------
84394
84401
84403
84404
84415
84422
84433
84444
84446
84448
84473
84479
84493
84494
84494
84495
84498
84500
84517
84522
84532
84533
84537
84538
84539
84541
84542
84543
84546
84551
84552
84556
84558
84560
84562
84563
84564
84568
84577
84580
84587
84608
84612
84616
84617
84628
84638
84644
84708
84713
84722
84728
84748
84749
84753
84754
84755
84757
84760
84761
84763
84766
84767
84773
84775
Ave.
Std Dev.
105.47
122.08
29.7
29.74
13.67
167.98
76.64
12.3
6.57
11.95
11.73
13.54
28.01
33.3
108.16
17.15
22.58
18.06
-9.87
33.55
75.23
48.42
23.65
6.53
25.25
11.89
49.71
139.71
13.09
10.36
5.41
36.44
17.09
37.8
30.78
96.29
48.36
15.04
11.02
42.7
33.57
34.59
13.01
7.68
16.59
28.87
20.24
17.93
28.22
19.54
12.63
17.26
10.67
17.4
14.09
17.4
14.93
9.39
35.58
33.33339
35.01278
6.21
11.7
11.23
21
22.28
5.14
16.94
9.38
0.68
7.72
7.69
10.26
11.42
8.22
17.13
7.1
8.6
9.24
22.12
6.52
8.21
4.09
10.21
10.98
7.84
4.12
4.75
7.73
6.26
5.38
19.33
10.92
6.96
20.59
13.16
6.16
11.68
12.31
5.88
10.42
8.99
5.8
0.42
5.01
1.53
2.49
5.71
4.8
2.46
3.21
5.39
4.27
3.96
2.78
7.52
2.29
5.11
2.8
12.33
8.380169
5.315011
6.25
14.92
15.66
24.29
-3.32
2.35
-0.14
3.92
6.89
1.21
1.2
5.46
6.66
17.65
19.98
2.14
5.49
8.62
-1.61
0.87
5.93
19.5
14.68
10.73
7.75
-1.75
10.78
11.7
2.47
7.23
1.45
0.17
8.58
32.26
1.44
7.74
7.27
10.42
2.34
12.44
9.73
8.78
2.42
5.63
6.55
3.81
7.74
7.46
4.96
4.19
5.8
5.63
4.79
4.92
6.38
5.97
9.1
5.13
22.22
7.505593
6.682011
11.28
17.74
12.53
21.67
20.07
13.43
18.87
9.15
1.42
7.48
7.44
10.1
11.95
10.21
22.06
7.3
9.14
9.66
18.78
7.55
11.53
7.47
11.24
10.73
8.77
4.11
7.54
14.92
6.35
5.77
17.37
11.5
7.57
22.28
13.18
10.98
13.35
12.32
5.89
12.29
10.32
7.56
1.21
5.19
2.66
3.94
6.6
5.67
3.98
4.17
5.8
5.05
4.36
3.66
7.78
3.31
5.88
3.32
14.23
9.621695
5.297703
97.34
205.2
25.17
8.44
11.52
192.59
102.58
21.98
5.89
11.93
11.93
9.37
35.14
24.2
124.53
10.49
10.92
11.86
3.49
27.41
64.89
48.31
12.76
8.19
16.48
8.71
46.81
601.42
11.2
7.65
5.36
36.98
15.68
32.78
35.21
148.27
70.98
2.94
4.65
64.21
13.85
16.86
44.81
6.81
20.35
27
7.6
3.69
21.45
11.2
3.97
4.42
3.87
7.25
3.17
10.88
7.85
1.88
11.64
41.08492
86.19264
2.48
10.09
28.74
19.89
30.16
22.59
19.29
13.14
0.74
2.2
2.2
1.7
9.21
3.82
17.13
5.73
5.83
6.46
0.93
2.59
3.09
2.43
3.57
1.98
5.21
1.77
2.32
4.98
6.1
4.41
0.73
3.7
3.54
4.65
8.1
4.89
1.12
0.56
0.78
12.17
2
4.55
9.64
2.22
1.94
4.85
1.29
0.86
5.52
3.06
3.03
1.93
1.31
2.35
3.89
1.51
2.88
1.61
3.68
5.748136
6.641589
5.11
3.72
6.4
10.8
6.05
6.06
6.46
7.47
1.86
2.93
2.93
1.41
2.8
2.41
3.11
2.1
1.61
2.28
1.09
3.59
3.64
3.63
2.35
7.85
2.67
0.35
1.66
1.44
2.25
1.63
0
3.63
3
2.62
2.37
1.06
1.48
1.49
1.82
6.74
1.39
2.12
5.74
1.99
1.58
3.34
1.27
2.56
2.47
1.24
0.05
1.3
1.56
0.92
-1.09
-1.87
1.34
0.54
-1.36
2.660339
2.31839
7.5
19.93
27.01
18.67
27.53
30.29
22.74
13.21
1.09
2.75
2.75
2.08
10.1
4.81
21.75
5.73
5.81
6.46
1.07
3.95
6.33
4.91
3.98
2.71
5.64
2.03
4.62
36.03
6.1
4.39
0.92
5.44
4.1
5.96
8.97
12.12
4.89
0.74
1.05
14.58
2.57
5.04
11.19
2.44
2.87
5.89
1.62
1.12
6.14
3.37
2.88
2.02
1.46
2.51
3.51
1.76
3.03
1.54
3.76
7.380678
8.091062
2000 Odyssey truck
1998 Voyager truck
2000 Caravan truck
1997 Caravan truck
1999 Durango truck
1998 Cherokee truck
1997 Wrangler truck
2003 Tracker truck
2000 Sienna Mini truck
1999 Voyager Mi truck
1996 Explorer truck
1996 Caravan truck
2004 Freestar Mi truck
1997 Ranger Pu truck
1997 Ranger Pu truck
1996 Sonoma Pu truck
2001 Sienna Mini truck
1998 Frontier Pu truck
1998 Caravan truck
1996 1500 Pu truck
2003 Montana truck
1999 Suburban truck
2000 Cherokee truck
1998 Ranger truck
1996 Tahoe truck
1996 Caravan truck
1996 Caravan truck
2000 Cherokee truck
1999 Dakota Pu truck
2002 Axiom truck
2002 Silouette truck
2001 Town&Cout truck
2001 S-IOPu truck
1998 Dakota Spo truck
2004 Dakota Pu truck
2003 Ranger 4X^ truck
1998 Caravan truck
1999 Ranger Pu truck
1998 Aerostar truck
2002 Town & Col truck
1996 Villager truck
1996 Quest truck
2000 Ranger truck
1999 Voyager truck
1997 Suburban truck
2002 Trailblazer truck
1996 Town And C truck
2001 Pathfinder truck
2003 Caravan truck
1996 Blazer truck
1998 Wmdstar truck
2002 Escape 2W truck
2002 Caravan truck
2001 Sienna truck
2003 Caravan truck
2003 Town And C truck
2002 Odyssey truck
2001 Grand Cher truck
2004 Escape truck
2004 Sedona truck
2003 Odyssey truck
2000 Caravan truck
1998 Frontier truck
1998 4Runner truck
1997 Suburban truck
74601
168876
85198
96455
95999
137053
97532
29519
137493
79230
109593
118369
14714
118470
118470
51863
59734
112521
80989
46711
49337
88900
88513
48208
69010
161280
161308
88541
64155
46363
61168
75545
106236
49775
8627
18757
127230
126851
0
84580
166799
125651
33680
113389
145147
77758
213656
66284
10200
94350
99476
36209
60790
80227
47649
20787
60753
90011
10519
16609
44752
93162
107615
115768
137630
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
VQ1,2.HS
VQ2,HS
FQ3
VQ2,HS
RDM
VG1
FQ3
84541 FQ,FPA
84537
FQ1
FD
VDP
VDP
VDP
VDP, VQ3
TORQUE MISSING BAG 2
-------
84470
84472
84482
84484
84588
84592
84601
84603
84605
84609
84614
84637
84674
84705
84707
84712
84717
84738
Ave.
Std Dev.
84407
84430
84474
84475
84512
84550
84582
84595
84611
84613
84630
84633
84635
84642
84643
84646
84654
84655
84659
84661
84662
84663
84669
84670
84672
84677
84682
84690
84692
84695
84699
84710
84719
84724
84727
84735
84737
84740
84745
84765
84777
Ave.
Std Dev.
74.86
90.33
87.76
89.69
118.11
31.82
4.61
79.19
31.32
59.51
129.28
106.5
71.35
74.94846
35.83373
377.85
56.04
61.15
59.86
127.09
49.85
7.28
21.27
55.42
51.4
144.85
27.63
322.78
17.42
20.85
44.91
8.95
53.37
25.39
25.44
15.31
47.19
5.22
20.46
11.04
538.46
76.01
11.75
18.01
68.5
12.33
8.17
28.62
60.98
62.77
37
71.68389
112.119
0.9
1.88
14.13
0.09
9.25
3.4
52.98
15.19
6.13
-0.03
20.5
0.09
1.76
9.713077
14.64358
115.61
22.37
37.4
11.72
3.47
13.5
6.88
11.01
24.63
9.37
13.35
19.18
70.1
10.29
5.92
14.61
4.29
9.86
4.06
9.74
5.01
2.25
8.1
17.55
1.37
57.89
0.39
2.33
1.4
25.24
2.57
2.82
10.33
18.93
0.98
1.78
16.00833
22.77881
9.67
4.2
0.21
3.09
7.76
10.12
13.07
23.96
8.42
8.57
15.84
10.54
8.34
9.522308
5.954041
73.6
14.78
2.77
2.69
4.92
33.41
0.54
11.1
19.63
8.21
40.6
7.38
22
7.14
6.08
11.3
4.62
15.42
9.03
11.44
0.37
18.7
7.74
20.44
-1.82
86.83
8.65
4.79
6.75
3.17
0.66
6.09
5.06
20.25
6.25
5.84
14.0675
18.65997
5.47
6.57
17.05
5.42
14.77
5.3
47.8
19.23
7.61
3.63
24.67
6.34
6.17
13.07923
12.34282
126.71
23.58
36.26
13.57
9.78
16.79
6.46
11.56
25.87
11.49
22.22
18.82
79.59
10.43
6.73
15.9
4.56
12.58
5.52
10.68
5.22
5.65
7.92
17.89
1.65
77.81
5.07
2.98
2.67
26.07
2.96
3.33
10.93
21.28
4.59
3.88
18.58333
25.51973
106.01
110.07
160.18
247.06
180.11
32.31
148.24
100.13
48.43
123.16
284.32
354.43
69.79
151.0954
94.68802
469.64
66.34
76.17
172.4
125.25
55.78
12.87
39.59
42.71
44.06
206.33
36.63
459.03
15.13
20.71
66.88
20.69
57.83
63.53
28.8
14.98
64.44
7.01
12.11
6.83
1038.48
641.15
8.08
21.97
29.57
21.49
35.04
28.56
110.58
267.93
42.79
123.0939
213.2474
9.24
3.19
11.48
74.43
42.54
6.41
48.46
22.73
6.72
23.13
72.39
13.71
12.51
26.68769
24.81404
136.99
22.17
66.51
38.55
17.46
13.04
1.56
3.68
10.9
7.57
54.97
4.06
136.44
6
4.73
12.8
3.17
17.82
19.95
10.03
4.29
18.67
1.69
20.24
1.86
124.64
5.31
0.82
3.38
37.38
5.04
9.03
5.64
11.99
97.92
1.78
26.05778
38.44189
4.31
2.8
9.95
12.38
17.75
2.66
12.1
2.79
7.64
7.33
26.91
6.81
4.66
9.083846
6.991913
85.54
10.35
19.82
11.35
8.66
17.45
1.1
1.53
2.42
23.04
94.76
4
35.84
3.12
1.48
12.87
2.83
4.76
19.71
3.51
5.14
5.39
2.26
9.7
1.84
116.82
4.45
1.53
2.36
4.53
3.63
4.39
3.59
2.21
22.33
-1.83
15.34667
27.08784
14.09
8.63
19.28
79.09
47.9
7.45
50.97
25.52
8.97
27.23
77.97
31
15.23
31.79462
24.91923
151.19
23.62
63.82
43.55
22.25
15.56
2.12
5.42
11.96
10.55
65.81
5.77
145.92
6.27
5.35
15.52
4.07
19.05
22.21
10.56
4.91
20.08
2.01
19.1
2.12
158.08
39.87
1.24
4.3
34.76
5.82
10.09
6.7
16.6
101.65
3.65
30.04306
42.85465
1973 280 Se ca
1977 Monte Carl ca
1979 Lasabre ca
1979 Lesabre ca
1978 Regal ca
1979 Ltd ca
1979 Regal ca
1979 210 Wagon ca
1977 280Z ca
1978 Regal ca
1978 Delta 88 ca
1980 Cutlass Sufca
1979 Firebird ca
1980 Malibu ca
1973 Impala ca
1979 Nova ca
1979 Mustang ca
1976 Gran Prix ca
1989 Grandam ca
1990 Spirit ca
1988 Civic ca
1986 Tempo ca
1982 Caprice ca
1988 Continental ca
1988 528E ca
1988 Escort ca
1989 Camry ca
1990 Delta 88 ca
1989 Accord ca
1987 740 Turbo ca
1989 Crown Vic ca
1989 Spirit ca
1987 Escort ca
1988 Accord ca
1990 Cutlass Cieca
1990 Electra Parl ca
1 988 Le Baron ca
1990 Century ca
1990 Eldorado ca
1989 Corsica ca
1990 Spirit ca
1989 Topaz ca
1983 Tercel ca
1988 ParkAvenuca
1990 Camry ca
1989 Cutlass Cieca
1988 Century ca
1989 Cutlass Cieca
1985 Caprice ca
1984 Monte Carte ca
1990 Cutlass Suf ca
1990 Cutlass Cieca
1982 Grenada ca
1988 Accord ca
1984 Celebrity ca
1990 Lesabre ca
1990 Civic ca
1985 Impala ca
1987 Cutlass ca
86134
36999
40364
40385
81379
65850
5864
47114
94782
64571
73729
79420
45370
31253
94178
86117
45551
60909
123575
93661
207265
70396
88587
31667
287806
133085
168091
185694
139963
248178
62847
139488
12845
209194
97522
169860
117003
148959
185384
98999
109931
6137
87900
146833
138235
220970
94555
220989
58223
68810
85449
171475
64654
209393
64091
107876
133966
75914
87020
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
VQ2,HS
FHS, VG1
VDP
VDP
VDP
VDP,VG1
VG1.2
VQ2,HS,VC SMOKER
VDP
VDP
-------
84396
84402
84406
84431
84437
84439
84440
84442
84443
84449
84451
84452
84453
84455
84456
84457
84463
84464
84485
84488
84490
84499
84505
84508
84518
84526
84528
84529
84534
84547
84548
84567
84569
84572
84573
84574
84575
84581
84585
84597
84639
84645
84668
84675
84681
84688
84714
84723
Ave.
Std Dev.
13.85
147.93
132.31
80.15
17.48
23.25
37.48
17.98
33.02
28.1
55
22.08
81.17
73.31
18.79
98.07
76.38
27.07
53.4
24.79
19.91
19.13
31.9
108.49
48.5
45.17
22.28
12.4
99.78
24.16
47.17
39.47
9.84
48.65
12.29
10.05
18.79
11.2
29.97
10.38
3.42
8.47
41.04
72.74
42.20023
34.69293
9.13
13.11
24.22
5.71
5.67
12.52
15.14
5.92
11.93
16.26
6.51
8.29
30.81
13.19
35.72
6.61
5.03
8.93
9.08
13.28
16.03
13.71
8.07
55.15
148.6
13.99
6.68
5.34
18.32
10.5
23.48
8.84
7.47
16.87
8.65
9.92
11.72
1.86
16.32
4.96
4.15
8.45
5.3
22.44
15.99727
22.58593
6.52
18.21
8.73
7.75
-4.3
4.06
8.57
-3.57
5.09
8.62
10.6
5.49
22.58
13.23
16.33
2.87
7.74
-9.96
-17.05
4.96
6.03
2.31
1.06
45.99
53.36
6.47
10.49
1.71
26.07
7.97
-8.4
5.53
11.55
17.22
6.84
-1.89
-0.69
-0.32
2.92
-9.38
1.21
9.27
1.37
24.11
7.665227
12.73659
9.2
20.37
28.85
9.71
5.6
12.49
15.86
5.9
12.55
16.32
9.36
8.82
32.83
16.4
33.47
11.18
8.97
8.58
9.67
13.3
15.52
13.22
8.83
57.32
136.84
15.13
7.76
5.46
23.17
11.05
22.53
10.25
7.88
18.57
8.72
9.11
11.23
2.19
16.13
4.26
3.91
8.51
6.9
25.21
16.79841
20.98195
59.17
179.87
212.89
84.02
16.18
31.65
60.61
17.67
39.05
10.3
34.83
10.96
70.83
86.03
16.75
96.79
94.8
20.17
26.61
18.16
11.45
14.36
22.39
55.35
54.86
37.95
40.24
9.45
245
20.17
12.09
38.68
4.65
58.44
5.68
7.24
17.73
7.96
23.96
14.89
8.21
14.49
82.09
40.6
46.25614
52.89274
8.26
12.27
57.54
25.86
1.28
6.3
11.41
1.72
2.84
6.23
5.19
1.29
36.62
19.07
112.52
31.1
16.72
1.63
2.62
3.92
8.99
2.11
1.42
53.61
143.3
29.1
17.2
2.5
33.14
2.6
3.25
3.04
0.87
2.93
0.66
3.29
3.68
1.44
5.65
1.75
4.11
10.55
6.69
9.86
16.27568
28.34227
2.22
3.98
11.36
4.28
1.53
1.9
12.25
1.45
1.46
1.04
1.89
1.83
20.53
12.7
21.48
7.25
4.55
1.57
2.02
3.73
1.89
1.34
3.93
31.08
60.5
8.23
6.38
2.04
30.51
0.15
2.07
4.21
0.58
1.97
2.94
0.15
0
1.75
1.74
1.98
0.94
4.65
3.84
3.54
6.714318
11.07675
10.49
20.3
62.57
27.37
2.08
7.31
14.07
2.53
4.62
6.07
6.52
1.83
37.27
22.2
101.1
32.92
20.03
2.58
3.84
4.66
8.62
2.69
2.69
52.13
133
28.11
17.66
2.84
44.19
3.36
3.63
5.02
1.05
5.78
1.09
3.28
4.16
1.8
6.36
2.44
4.11
10.34
10.44
11.04
17.18614
26.52929
1995 Escort ca
1991 Civic ca
1995 Corolla ca
1991 Grand Marcca
1994 Camry ca
1995 Bonneville ca
1995 Park Avenuca
1994 Camry ca
1991 Prizm ca
1994 Regal ca
1994 Regal ca
1995 Taurus ca
1995 Maxima ca
1995 Mustang ca
1993 Grand Prix ca
1995 Crown Victcca
1995 Contour ca
1994 Intrepid ca
1991 Fleetwood ca
1995 Lesabre ca
1991 Fleetwood ca
1995 Integra ca
1993 Intrepid ca
1992 Civic ca
1994 Skylark ca
1991 Towncar ca
1994 Grand Marcca
1993 Sundance ca
1993 Legacy ca
1995 Corolla ca
1995 Intrepid ca
1992 Sedan De-\ca
1995 Taurus ca
1994 Topaz ca
1993 Park Avenuca
1993 Taurus ca
1994 Lumina ca
1995 Corsica ca
1993 Escort Sw ca
1994 Sunbird ca
1995 Cavalier ca
1993 960 ca
1991 Delta 88 ca
1993 Tempo ca
1993 Tempo ca
1993 Taurus ca
1994 Sw ca
1991 Cavalier ca
106996
220022
107983
19292
131874
168145
144956
131894
132326
92177
92214
139316
181395
146289
177931
179731
104083
145950
97124
126036
97144
80579
210298
124705
20081 1
188033
130521
84652
114227
103068
138989
155895
203067
41482
74444
39476
126825
78767
99988
145869
140500
197094
139412
25053
25073
92978
132333
182349
7 VPA
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 84437
7 FQ2
7 VQ
7 84449
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 84485
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 VG1
7
7
7 FQ
7
7
7
7 FPA
7 FPA
7 FPA
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 VG
7
7
7
Dup Rnd 1
CARONA CURRENT UNSTABLE
TTL
POST
TTL
-------
84393
84398
84399
84408
84409
84411
84412
84414
84416
84418
84419
84420
84421
84426
84427
84428
84432
84438
84445
84483
84502
84503
84504
84514
84515
84520
84521
84557
84589
84593
84596
84599
84622
84629
84729
84733
84739
84743
84751
84759
Ave.
Std Dev.
24.98
40.55
57.61
27.35
86.28
47.73
20.83
33.83
26.22
50.98
35.8
23.46
9.74
40.77
40.59
-1.64
37.62
22.58
24.61
18.84
17.23
41.5
38.39
25.94
19.69
18.12
18.37
20.25
1.16
72.36
53.26
39.98
14.59
16.81
15.61
10.56
5.23
29.66973
18.75004
-0.23
9.34
15.68
13.01
23.54
12.12
4.87
8
9.36
10.67
13.62
9.84
10.45
9.33
2.85
8.96
16.15
7.2
18.43
15.32
7.83
6.59
3.92
10.62
10.02
13.07
5.25
3.48
20.79
2.6
15.7
4.02
3.27
3.72
3.05
8.72
3.4
9.312432
5.539727
1.2
8.56
-3.28
5.38
-0.54
9.91
11.7
0.88
13.76
1.74
-3.75
-3.62
-2.28
-2.01
2.89
-1.97
4.58
1.56
-8.38
6.12
-0.02
-5.26
13.8
6.12
10.98
13.8
12.32
6.19
12.47
0.73
1.66
3.51
4.29
6.44
4.13
8.04
3.25
3.916216
5.857385
1.18
10.92
16.54
13.28
24.98
13.8
6.16
8.85
10.55
12.2
13.59
9.61
9.52
10.21
4.86
7.63
16.45
7.6
16.89
14.88
7.78
7.6
6.43
11.11
10.59
13.38
6.43
4.55
19.17
6.06
16.66
5.67
3.91
4.58
3.77
8.77
3.48
9.99027
5.129218
22.64
34.24
100.25
27.67
206.2
0.69
8.68
26.37
19.07
80.81
36.54
26.97
8.49
60.97
47.76
5.05
31.16
27.03
16.06
7.37
17.25
14.73
38.48
15.21
14.38
19.74
599.46
22.15
1.67
87.64
71.38
21.36
6.96
5.85
11.43
0.73
2.82
47.16919
100.9203
1.2
3.69
11.41
3.25
81.41
2.96
3.41
11.05
3.33
13.84
2.42
5.68
1.03
15.17
4.26
2.55
1.68
4.06
2.96
2.6
1.79
3.32
3.76
2.13
2
1.8
1.77
2.37
1.88
8.61
3.99
4.56
1.89
1.19
0.58
3.23
0.71
6.041622
13.21436
3.6
5.51
25.13
3.41
18.28
6.57
5.59
0
5.03
8.57
2.79
7.4
1.34
6.58
3.71
2.4
2.45
0.4
3.72
1.87
-0.08
2.41
1.42
0.09
1.38
1.27
0.42
1.99
0.76
2.2
6.43
1.93
1.63
1.34
1.2
0.56
0.3
3.772973
4.972171
2.48
5.42
16.89
4.54
83.25
3.09
3.83
11.07
4.28
17.03
4.22
6.91
1.45
17
6.53
2.68
3.24
5
3.7
2.8
2.45
3.85
5.43
2.68
2.59
2.69
32.84
3.38
1.8
12.22
7.61
5.16
2.13
1.44
1.18
2.92
0.79
8.015405
14.17063
1999 300M
2001 Accord
1997 Accord
2002 Sable
1999 Malibu
1996 Sc
1996 Civic
2003 Impala
1998 Civic
1997 Grand Am
1998 Lumina
2000 Accord
2000 Sedan
2001 Sedan
2001 Galant
1998 Malibu
1999 Sedan
2001 Century
2001 Sedan
1996 Neon
1996 Concorde
2002 Taurus
2000 Concorde
2002 Concorde
1999 Stratus
2001 Taurus
1997 Accord
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
2000 ParkAvenuca
2001 Sedan
1998 Accord
1997 Taurus
1998 Avalon
1999 Camry
1996 TI2.5
2001 Camry
1998 Skylark
1998 Protoge
1999 Protoge
1998 Escort
2005 Focus
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
ca
90240
62350
82926
29501
79925
78346
140479
11340
118218
58100
79187
84180
51721
44251
51764
107047
98565
33749
67290
79848
111502
26406
65330
34231
108838
47479
101888
67099
56662
75067
97601
29575
64134
117642
46869
65464
88569
122968
55309
6701
VPA,FG1 POWER FAILURE, Dup Rnd 1
PA POWER RESTORED
VG1,2
VQ Auto Valve off
FQ COMPRESSED AIR SHUT DOWN
VG3
FPA TTL SIGNAL MISSING
RDM
RDM
RDM
VQ1,2,HS
-------
Emission Rates from the QCM Emission Rates from the Gravimetric Filter
Year Bag 1 Bag 2 Bag 3 FTP Composite Bag 1 Bag 2 Bag 3 FTP Composite
mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile
TRUCKS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
CARS
1970-1980
1981-1990
1991-1995
1996-2005
139.04
104.91
38.25
33.33
74.95
71.68
42.20
29.67
39.79
20.83
16.28
8.38
9.71
16.01
16.00
9.31
22.27
21.37
10.95
7.51
9.52
14.07
7.67
3.92
43.94
25.25
17.06
9.62
13.08
18.58
16.80
9.99
172.99
160.34
42.39
41.08
151.10
123.09
46.26
47.17
54.04
32.16
13.60
5.75
26.69
26.06
16.28
6.04
20.16
18.70
4.87
2.66
9.08
15.35
6.71
3.77
58.11
37.92
14.51
7.38
31.79
30.04
17.19
8.02
Composite Check
Bag 1
Bag 2
Bag 3
Norn. Dst. Emissions FTP
mi. mg/mi. mg/mi.
1.19 29.28
8.64 9.33
1.19 3.63 0.0099772
-------
Bin QCM Bag • QCM Bag ; QCM Bag : QCM Grav Bag 1 Grav Bag 2 Grav Bag c Gravimetric
mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile FTP Comf mg/mile mg/mile mg/mile FTP Composite
mg/mile mg/mile
1 /Average
Std. Dev.
2/Average
Std. Dev.
3/Average
Std. Dev.
4/Average
Std. Dev.
5/Average
Std. Dev.
6/Average
Std. Dev.
7/Average
Std. Dev.
8/Average
Std. Dev.
139.04
159.43
104.91
137.71
38.25
26.56
33.33
35.01
74.95
35.83
71.68
112.12
42.20
34.69
29.67
18.75
39.79
48.19
20.83
27.84
16.28
10.31
8.38
5.32
9.71
14.64
16.01
22.78
16.00
22.59
9.31
5.54
22.27
19.01
21.37
28.31
10.95
9.23
7.51
6.68
9.52
5.95
14.07
18.66
7.67
12.74
3.92
5.86
43.94
44.71
25.25
30.93
17.06
9.89
9.62
5.30
13.08
12.34
18.58
25.52
16.80
20.98
9.99
5.13
172.99
203.19
160.34
189.01
42.39
40.84
41.08
86.19
151.10
94.69
123.09
213.25
46.26
52.89
47.17
100.92
54.04
52.82
32.16
49.57
13.60
10.97
5.75
6.64
26.69
24.81
26.06
38.44
16.28
28.34
6.04
13.21
20.16
31.32
18.70
36.77
4.87
6.08
2.66
2.32
9.08
6.99
15.35
27.09
6.71
11.08
3.77
4.97
58.11
50.54
37.92
51.26
14.51
10.96
7.38
8.09
31.79
24.92
30.04
42.85
17.19
26.53
8.02
14.17
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix II
Quality Management Plan
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
feERG
Quality Management Plan
Eastern Research Group, Inc.
110 Hartwell Avenue
Lexington, MA 02421
April 2004
-------
QMP REVISION HISTORY
Revision 1: April 15,2004
QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
SIGNATURES OF APPROVAL
Name: William S. Crews
Title: Project Manager _
Org, : ___Beyjjac<|u_a_Kiiightjjic_.__
_____
Pate. X- I " dig
Name: Rob Santos
Title: Quality Assurance Manager
Org.: NuStats
Date: 9 / 28 706
, -x7
Hams: Eric Eujita.
Title: Project ManagHL
Org.: Desert Research Institute
Date.
Name: Sandcep Kishan
Title: Vice President
Org.: Eastern Research Group
Date.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
i
-------
APPROVAL FOR THE AGENCY
Name: Greg Janssen
Title: Project Officer. US EPA
Org.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Date:
Name: Carl Fulper
Title: Work Assignment Manager
Org.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Date:
Name: Ruth Schnek
Title: OAR-NVFEL Quality Manager
Org.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Date:
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
SECTION 1 MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 1-1
1.1 ERG QUALITY POLICY 1-2
1.2 ORGANIZATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND AUTHORITY OF
QUALITY ASSURANCE STAFF 1-2
1.2.1 Responsibilities, Authority, and Independence of the Corporate QA
Manager 1-6
1.2.2 Responsibilities, Authority, and Independence of the Local QA
Coordinators 1-7
1.2.3 Authority to Stop Work for Quality Considerations 1-8
1.2.4 Access of QA Staff to Management 1-9
1.3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES 1-9
1.3.1 Project Manager (Principal Investigator) 1-11
1.3.2 ERG Task Leaders (Work Assignment Manager) 1-12
1.3.3 Project QA Coordinators 1-13
1.3.4 Project Staff 1-14
1.4 ERG TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS SUPPORTED BY
THE QA/QC PROGRAM 1-15
1.4.1 Oversight of Subcontractor Activities 1-15
1.4.2 Coordination of QA and QC Activities 1-16
1.4.3 Management's Assurance that ERG's QA/QC System is
Understood and Implemented 1-17
SECTION 2 QUALITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS 2-1
2.1 INTRODUCTION 2-1
2.2 ERG CORPORATE QUALITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS 2-2
2.2.1 ERG Corporate Quality System Documentation 2-2
2.2.2 ERG Corporate Quality System Annual Reviews and Planning 2-5
2.2.3 ERG Corporate Quality System Management Assessments 2-5
2.2.4 Training 2-7
2.3 ERG PROJECT QUALITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS 2-7
2.3.1 Project Quality Planning 2-8
2.3.2 Project Quality Documentation 2-11
2.3.3 Project Data Quality Assessment 2-12
2.3.4 Project Quality Assessment 2-13
2.4 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2-15
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
SECTION 3 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING 3-1
3.1 ERG TRAINING POLICY 3-1
3.2 DETERMINATION OF INITIAL CAPABILITY 3-1
3.3 TRAINING 3-2
3.3.1 Training of New Employees 3-3
3.3.2 Training Needs Identification 3-3
3.3.3 Training Courses and Programs 3-4
3.3.4 Documentation of Training 3-6
3.3.5 Retraining 3-6
3.4 FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS FOR
SPECIALIZED ACTIVITIES 3-6
3.5 EVIDENCE OF PERSONNEL JOB PROFICIENCY 3-8
3.6 PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATIONS 3-8
SECTION 4 PROCUREMENT OF ITEMS AND SERVICES 4-1
4.1 INTRODUCTION: ERG's PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES 4-1
4.2 PROCUREMENT PLANNING AND CONTROL 4-2
4.3 PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL AND QUALITY REQUIREMENTS 4-5
4.3.1 Types of Procurement Documents Used By ERG 4-5
4.3.2 Procedures for Review, Approval, and Ensuring Adequacy of
Procurement Documents 4-7
4.3.3 Review and Approval of Responses to Solicitations 4-8
4.3.4 Requirement for Suppliers to Demonstrate Capability 4-8
4.4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT SPECIFICATION, REVIEW, AND
CHANGES 4-9
4.4.1 Review of Changed Procurement Documents 4-10
4.5 ENSURING THAT PROCURED ITEMS AND SOURCES ARE OF
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY 4-11
4.5.1 Inspection and Acceptance 4-11
4.6 EVALUATION OF SUBCONTRACTOR AND CONSULTANT
PERFORMANCE 4-12
4.6.1 Paying Suppliers of Items and Services 4-12
SECTION 5 DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS 5-1
5.1 IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF RECORDS 5-1
5.1.1 Corporate Quality System Documents and Records 5-1
5.1.2 Project Documents and Records 5-2
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
iv
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
5.2 GENERATION OF RECORDS 5-2
5.2.1 Project Records 5-3
5.2.2 Corporate Quality System Records (SOPs and QMP) 5-4
5.2.3 Quality System Document Control 5-4
5.3 PROJECT RECORD MAINTENANCE 5-7
5.3.1 Organization 5-7
5.3.2 Transmittal and Distribution 5-8
5.3.3 Control of Record Access (Confidential Business Information) 5-8
5.3.4 Retrieval and Preservation (Protection) 5-9
5.3.5 Retention and Disposition 5-11
5.4 EVIDENTIARY RECORDS (CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY AND
CONFIDENTIALITY) 5-11
5.4.1 Chain-of-Custody Procedures 5-11
5.4.2 Confidentiality Procedures for Evidentiary Records 5-14
SECTION 6 COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE 6-1
6.1 ENSURING QUALITY SOFTWARE 6-1
6.1.1 Software Development 6-2
6.1.2 Software Installation 6-3
6.1.3 Software Testing 6-3
6.1.4 Software Use, Maintenance, and Control 6-4
6.1.5 Software Documentation 6-4
6.1.6 Commercial Software 6-5
6.2 ENSURING QUALITY HARDWARE 6-6
6.2.1 ERG's Computer Network 6-6
6.2.2 Hardware Configuration 6-7
6.2.3 Hardware Testing 6-9
6.2.4 Hardware Use, Maintenance, and Control 6-10
6.2.5 Hardware Documentation 6-11
6.2.6 Laboratory Automated Data Collection Systems 6-11
6.3 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 6-15
6.3.1 Data Entry 6-16
6.3.2 Assuring Database Quality 6-17
6.3.3 Assuring Spreadsheet Quality 6-18
6.3.4 Modeling 6-19
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
V
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
SECTION 7 PLANNING 7-1
7.1 SYSTEMATIC PLANNING PROCESS: WORK ASSIGNMENT
REVIEW 7-1
7.1.1 Identification of Key Information Users ('Customers') and the
Organization(s) That Will Supply the Information to the Users 7-1
7.1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 7-2
7.2 SYSTEMATIC PLANNING PROCESS: WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT . 7-2
7.2.1 Schedule, Milestones, and Budget 7-2
7.2.2 Regulatory and Contractual Requirements 7-3
7.2.3 Definition of Data Needs and Use 7-4
7.2.4 How, When, and Where the Data Will Be Obtained 7-4
7.2.5 Data Analysis, Evaluation, and Assessment (Refer to 7.3) 7-5
7.3 DESIGN OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT 7-5
7.4 QAPP 7-6
7.5 SECONDARY DATA 7-7
7.5.1 Assuring the Quality of Secondary Data from Existing Databases .... 7-8
7.5.2 Assuring the Quality of Existing Measurements Data 7-9
7.6 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES PROCESS 7-9
SECTION 8 IMPLEMENTATION OF WORK PROCESSES 8-1
8.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ENSURING THAT WORK IS PERFORMED
ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS AND SOPS 8-1
8.1.1 Responsibilities 8-2
8.2 DEVELOPMENT OF WORK PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES 8-3
8.2.1 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) 8-3
8.2.2 Procedures for Special or Critical Operations 8-4
8.3 CONTROL MEASURES 8-4
SECTION 9 ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE 9-1
9.1 CONDUCTING ERG QUALITY SYSTEM AND PROJECT QUALITY
ASSESSMENTS 9-1
9.1.1 Planning 9-2
9.1.2 Assessment Personnel 9-2
9.1.3 Management Review and Response to Assessment Findings 9-3
9.1.4 Corrective Actions 9-4
9.1.5 Resolution of Disputes 9-4
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
vi
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
9.2 ASSESSMENT TOOLS 9-5
9.2.1 Management Systems Reviews 9-5
9.2.2 Peer Reviews 9-6
9.2.3 Technical Reviews 9-7
9.2.4 Performance Evaluation Audits 9-8
9.2.5 Data Quality Assessments and Data Quality Audits 9-9
9.2.6 Readiness Reviews 9-10
9.2.7 Technical Systems Audits 9-10
9.2.8 Surveillance 9-12
9.3 QC MEASURES 9-12
9.3.1 Field Control Samples 9-12
9.3.2 Chemical and Physical Measurement Control 9-13
9.3.3 Statistical Control and Quality Calculations 9-15
SECTION 10 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 10-1
10.1 MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT 10-1
10.2 IDENTIFICATION AND REMEDIATION OF CONDITIONS ADVERSE
TO QUALITY 10-2
10.3 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES 10-3
10.4 ENCOURAGING STAFF PARTICIPATION 10-3
APPENDIX A - ERG STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR SCIENTIFIC AND
TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
vii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1-1 Corporate Organization 1-3
1-2 ERG's Corporate QA Structure Functions Independently of the Project
Management Structure 1-5
1-3 Typical Project-Level QA Organization 1-10
5-1 SOP Title Page 5-6
6-1 ERG Hardware and Software Infrastructure 6-8
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
4-1 Contents of ERG Procurement Manual 4-3
6-1 EPA Information Technology Requirements 6-17
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
viii
-------
EASTERN RESEARCH GROUP, INC.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
INTRODUCTION
This Quality Management Plan (QMP) describes ERG's quality assurance/quality control
(QA/QC) program in terms of the company's organizational structure, the functional
responsibilities of management and staff, and the cooperative interaction among those staff
planning, implementing, and assessing the activities conducted under a specific project. Quality
management is the component within the overall corporate management structure that
determines and implements the quality policy, which includes strategic planning, allocation of
resources, and other systematic activities. ERG is committed to maintaining a corporate quality
management program that is responsive to the requirements of the diverse work it performs,
which ranges from field testing and laboratory analysis to education, training, and outreach.
This company-wide commitment to provide services of consistent, high quality directs all QA
activities.
The components of ERG's QA/QC program include:
• A statement of ERG's quality policy;
• A description of ERG's corporate and project organizational structures, and the
relationship of the QA/QC function to these organizational structures;
• A description of the authority and responsibilities of the QA/QC function at both
the corporate and project level; and
• A discussion of ERG's general approach for planning and implementing activities
affecting quality in the Science and Engineering technical services areas.
The QMP includes the following sections:
1. Management and Organization;
2. Quality System Components;
3. Personnel Qualification and Training;
4. Procurement of Items and Services;
5. Documentation and Records;
6. Computer Hardware and Software;
7. Planning;
8. Implementation of Work Processes;
9. Assessment and Response; and
10. Quality Improvement.
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
1
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 1 of 17
SECTION 1
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
ERG's quality system reflects the company's mission: ERG provides quality technical
services to meet the needs of our clients in a responsive and responsible manner. The
quality system provides the necessary elements to plan, implement, document, and assess the
effectiveness of quality assurance and QC. QC is a system of routine technical activities
implemented by the project personnel to measure and control the quality of data as they are
collected and manipulated. QC activities include technical reviews, accuracy checks, and the use
of standard procedures for data collection, analysis, and reporting. Quality assurance (QA)
includes those activities that provide an independent assessment of a project or project tasks,
including QC functions.
Responsibility for quality at ERG lies with management and depends on the cooperation
of all employees. Specific responsibility for the quality of a given project lies with the Project
management team (Project Manager and Task Leaders) who oversees the quality of all ERG
services. All scientific and technical services provided by ERG must meet appropriate quality
objectives that satisfy the client's needs and expectations, with the understanding that costs of
QA/QC activities must be proportional to the needs of the program. In addition, ERG routinely
incorporates technical and editorial reviews of documents to ensure that the client's needs and
expectations are adequately met with documents that are technically correct and well-written and
with data that are complete, accurate, precise, representative, and reproducible.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 17
This Quality Management Plan (QMP) describes ERG's quality system, which is the
structured and documented management system for the policies, objectives, principles,
organizational authority, responsibilities, accountability, and implementation that ensure quality
in work processes, products, and services. The quality system provides a framework for
planning, implementing, and assessing work performed by the organization and for executing
required QA/QC.
1.1 ERG QUALITY POLICY
ERG provides quality technical services to meet or exceed the needs of our clients in an effective and
responsible manner. We measure our success as a company by our customers' satisfaction. It is our
policy to maintain a corporate quality management program in order to be responsive to our clients'
requirements for the diverse work we perform, which ranges from field testing and laboratory analysis to
education, training, and outreach. ERG is committed to allocating the necessary resources for
implementing, maintaining, and improving our quality management program, as well as preventing
problems before they occur. Our company-wide pledge to provide services of consistently high quality
drives all ERG quality assurance activities.
1.2 ORGANIZATION, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND AUTHORITY OF QUALITY
ASSURANCE STAFF
The organization of the QA structure within ERG enables complete independence in
program review. The Corporate QA Manager, ERG Vice President Arlene Levin, reports
directly to ERG's President David Meyers, as indicated in the corporate organizational chart
shown in Figure 1-1. She interacts with the Local QA Coordinators to assure that
project-specific QA/QC programs are commensurate with project objectives and with ERG's
quality system. The Local QA Coordinators, Mr. Andrew Burnette and Dr. Timothy DeFries
(Austin, TX) report directly to Ms. Levin.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
7
Eastern Research Group
President
David M eyers
Vice Presidents
Project Managers
Project Staff
Corporate QA
Manager
Vice President
Arlene Levin
Local QA
Coordinators:
A. Levin, Lexington
B. Bicknell, Chantilly
R. M errill, M orrisville
W. Long, Arlington
T. Defries, Austin
1-1. Corporate Organization
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 17
The independence of quality assurance is maintained at the project level (Figure 1-2). A
project-specific QA coordinator is assigned to each project and given responsibility for
coordinating the development and execution of QA/QC activities in all phases of the project.
The Project QA Coordinator, directly responsible to the Local QA Coordinator, is responsible
for ensuring the preparation of Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs), which document
project-specific policies, organization, objectives, functional activities, and specific QA/QC
procedures; providing an independent review of the project approach, methods, experimental
design, and QC activities; and conducting independent systems, performance, and data quality
assessments through quality assurance audits. He/she verifies through continual evaluation that
the overall quality management system is performing effectively and implements corrective
measures, if necessary. Finally, he/she documents the results of all QA/QC activities in reports
to ERG management. If the Project QA Coordinator is not the Local QA Coordinator, then
he/she reports findings to the latter.
The independent authority of the QA staff is extremely important to ERG and to our
clients. To this end, ERG confers sufficient authority on its QA staff to ensure that projects meet
their defined data quality objectives and that data generated by ERG are of known quality. ERG
has more than 23 years of experience supporting QA/QC activities on programs for EPA and
other government clients. This experience gives us an understanding of the different levels of
QA/QC activities necessary to cover the spectrum of quality objectives in ERG's scientific and
technical programs, and it allows us to configure our QA staff and approach to best meet client
needs. We are committed to meeting the QA/QC objectives of all our programs and our
approach has proven effective for the broad range of our project work.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 17
Eastern Research Group
President
Project Manager
Task Leaders
Project Staff
Project Management
Organization/Structure
Corporate QA
M anager
Local QA
Coordinators:
Project-Specific QA
Coordinator
Corporate QA Management
Organization/Structure
Figure 1-2. ERG's Corporate QA Structure Functions Independently of the Project
Management Structure
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 6 of 17
The responsibilities, authority, and independence of ERG's corporate QA staff are
outlined below.
1.2.1 Responsibilities, Authority, and Independence of the Corporate QA Manager
The Corporate QA Manager, Ms. Arlene Levin, plans, assesses, and improves ERG's
quality system. She is organizationally independent, reporting directly to the ERG president.
She is also responsible for:
Developing QA policy for ERG in accordance with EPA and other client QA
policies and direction from ERG management;
Developing the corporate QMP, reviewing it annually, and revising it as
necessary;
Reviewing quality-related documents that are part of an ERG procurement, to
determine if they are adequate to meet ERG's client's needs;
Ensuring that all ERG project personnel understand the ERG quality system,
through training and access to QA policy and procedure documents;
Interacting with the Local QA Coordinators to assure that project-specific QA/QC
programs are commensurate with project objectives and with ERG's quality
system;
Ensuring that independent audits are conducted to determine the effectiveness of
the ERG QA/QC program;
Working with Local QA Coordinators in conducting management systems
reviews, described in Section 9.2.1 of this QMP;
Implementing corrective actions for quality problems raised by Local and Project
QA Coordinators;
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 17
• Recommending required management level corrective actions; and
• Stopping work of inadequate quality until identified deficiencies are resolved.
1.2.2 Responsibilities, Authority, and Independence of the Local QA Coordinators
Local QA Coordinators are designated for all ERG offices. They are organizationally
independent, reporting to the Corporate QA Manager, Arlene Levin, who reports directly to the
ERG president. (Ms. Levin also functions as the Local QA Coordinator for the Lexington
office.) Local QA Coordinators are responsible for:
• Assisting the Corporate QA Manager in developing QA policies and procedures;
• Working with the Project Management Team to assure that project-specific
QA/QC programs are commensurate with project objectives and with ERG's
quality system;
• Assisting the Project Manager, and ERG Task Leaders in identifying and
assigning appropriate project-specific QA coordinators and peer reviewers;
• Reviewing and approving QAPPs prepared by project staff;
• Reviewing reports from Project QA Coordinators of QA/QC procedures
developed and executed for each project;
• Conducting independent audits to determine the effectiveness of the ERG QA/QC
program, conducting management systems reviews, and independent technical
assessments;
• Maintaining records of internal Q A audits;
• Designating an appropriate individual to create needed standard operating
procedures (SOPs), reviewing the draft procedure or designating an appropriate
technical reviewer, and circulating the approved SOP to technical staff members;
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 8 of 17
• Maintaining copies of SOPs pertaining to the ERG location in a central filing
system;
• Ensuring that all ERG personnel performing work covered by the QMP are
notified of any changes and are informed of current requirements; and
• Submitting a summary of all unresolved or in-progress Requests for Corrective
Action to ERG senior management (described in Section 10.2 of this QMP).
1.2.3 Authority to Stop Work for Quality Considerations
As discussed in Section 9 of ERG's Corporate QMP, the Project QA Coordinator audits
the QA/QC performance of the project team. If the Project QA Coordinator finds deficiencies in
project team performance, he/she notifies the ERG Task Leader, the Project Manager and Local
QA Coordinator. If the deficiencies are not resolved, the Project QA Coordinator recommends
that the ERG Task Leader stop work, replace personnel, or make other necessary changes so that
the deficiencies are resolved. If deficiencies are still not resolved, the Project QA Coordinator
notifies the Local QA Coordinator and Corporate QA Manager who ensure that the quality
system outlined in this QMP is implemented and maintained. If the ERG Task Leader is
unavailable, the Project Manager serves in his place.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 17
1.2.4 Access of QA Staff to Management
ERG's QA/QC program is implemented at three staff levels, the Corporate QA Manager
and Local QA Coordinators, described above, and the Project QA Coordinators, described in
Section 1.3, below. The Project QA Coordinators serve as internal consultants to the Project
Manager, and Task Leaders in developing project-specific QC systems. The Local QA
Coordinators report to the Corporate QA
Manager, Arlene Levin, who reports directly
"If you don't get a reasonable response to an
issue or problem in a reasonable amount of time,
contact me directly. Please don't feel that you're
bothering me, or that I'm too busy. If something
is of concern to you, I'd like to know about it and
, ,. T^^, ^ A i^^ get a chance to do something about it."
plan, assess, and improve ERG s QA/QC
nroeram ERG President, David Meyers
From President's Message on ERG Intranet
to the ERG president. This structure ensures
that QA personnel have access to the
appropriate levels of management in order to
In addition, QA staff, like all ERG
staff, can contact the ERG president directly about concerns they feel have not been resolved at a
lower management level.
1.3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
This section describes the organizational structure ERG uses to manage projects
including the integration of QA/QC activities. For all work assignments, staff responsibilities,
authority, and lines of communication are delineated in project-specific work plans and in the
QAPPs. These plans are reviewed and approved by participants before work begins. The plans
are disseminated using document control procedures to ensure that any changes made to the
original plans are implemented by all project staff. Figure 1-3 presents a typical project-level
QA organization.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 10 of 17
Local QA Coordinator
Project Manager
ERG Task Leader
Project-Specific QA
Coordinator
Technical Reviewers
and Peer Reviewers
Project Staff
Lines of com m unication
Reporting and authority
Figure 1-3. Typical Project-Level QA Organization
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 11 of 17
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 12 of 17
1.3.1 Project Manager
Project Managers (sometimes called Principal Investigators) at ERG have overall
responsibility for individual work assignments. They organize and direct the technical activities
and functions as the primary liaison between the client, management, and the project team. The
duties of an ERG Project Manager include:
• Responding quickly to client requests and inquiries;
• Communicating with the client on technical matters and the and ERG Contract
Manager on contractual matters;
• Informing proj ect staff of contract requirements and ensuring the staff follow the
requirements;
• Reviewing contract modifications;
• Reviewing all work assignments, work plans, and cost estimates;
• Ensuring that the project receives the appropriate staffing levels and technical
expertise;
• Initiating and reviewing subcontractor work assignments;
• Managing and reviewing technical and financial progress reports and invoices;
• Implementing ERG's Security Plan for Handling Confidential Business
Information;
Implementing ERG's QMP;
• Assuring ERG remains free of conflict-of-interest;
• Working with the Project QA Coordinator and the ERG Task Leader to resolve
any quality problems that arise; and
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 13 of 17
• Serving as the point-of-contact with ERG management on all matters relating to
the contract.
• Coordinating the technical components (including personnel, facilities, and
equipment) required under the contract;
• Assisting with the selection of project personnel;
• Monitoring the technical activities on each work assignment to ensure the
technical objectives, budget, and schedule are met;
• Managing preparation and implementation of work plans, test plans, quality
assurance project plans and cost estimates in accordance with EPA directions and
format; and
• Reviewing performance of ERG Task Leaders; and
• Maintaining an awareness of new client policies and technical issues and
communicating these to all work assignment staff.
1.3.2 ERG Task Leaders
ERG Task Leaders (sometimes called ERG Work Assignment Managers) coordinate the
activities of the individual tasks required for completion of a given work assignment. In
executing these duties, ERG Task Leaders:
Are available to the client for action on any problem related to specific work
assignments;
Prepare and implement work plans, test plans, health and safety plans, and quality
assurance project plans and associated project instructions in response to work
assignments;
Provide the client with periodic status briefings or reports;
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 14 of 17
• Implement ERG's cost and performance tracking and control system;
• Complete project on-time, within-budget, and in accordance with work order or
assignment technical and regulatory objectives;
• Maintain and document all work assignment-related records, files, calculations,
assumptions, and professional engineering judgments;
• Follow ERG's QMP and ensure the technical quality of reports, memoranda, and
other communications from inception to delivery;
• Monitor the technical activities of each ERG proj ect staff member to ensure that
they are meeting the highest technical standards and adhering to the budget and
schedule;
• Review the performance of ERG staff;
• Keep the ERG Project Manager informed on all aspects of each task, including
expenditures, technical progress, problems, and recommended solutions;
• Monitor subcontractor performance and provide performance data to the ERG
Proj ect Manager;
• Ensure compliance with all QC acceptance criteria as specified in any QAPP or
other project-specific supplement to the QMP; and
• Keep the Project QA Coordinator and the Project Manager advised of any quality
problems that arise.
1.3.3 Project QA Coordinators
Project QA Coordinators are responsible for the development and execution of QA
activities throughout the course of a project, including work plan, test plan, health and safety
plan, and quality assurance project plan development and execution, data analysis, and reporting.
ERG identifies a Project QA Coordinator for each work assignment or group of related work
assignments on this contract. In this capacity, the Project QA Coordinators:
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 15 of 17
As required by the work order or assignment, ensure preparation of a QAPP that
documents the project-specific policies, organization, objectives, functional
activities, and specific QA/QC procedures designed to achieve quality goals or
requirements. ( e.g., QAPPs prepared for EPA projects will comply with EPA
Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans, EPA/240/B -01/003 March
2001 (QA/R-5), and/or NRMRL QMP Appendix C: Quality Assurance Planning
Requirements, as specified by the client).
Verify that the requirements of the approved QAPP and other ERG QA/QC
procedures are communicated to the project team;
Serve as internal consultants to the Project Manager, and ERG Task Leaders in
defining quality goals or requirements and in developing a project-specific QC
system that is responsive to them;
In consultation with the Local QA Coordinator, verify that subcontractors' quality
related procedures are adequate and executed;
Provide an independent review of the project approach, methods, and sampling
design;
Provide the mechanism for bringing quality problems to the immediate attention
of the Project Manager or, if warranted, to the attention of the Local QA
Coordinator or Corporate QA Manager for implementation of corrective action;
Provide an independent assessment of performance through QA audits;
Oversee any external QA audit activities requested by the client if required by
work assignment; and
Document the results of all QA/QC activities in reports to ERG management and,
if required by the work assignment, to the client(s).
1.3.4 Project Staff
Project staff are responsible for executing the project QA/QC requirements specified in
the QAPP and other project plans. They are responsible for documenting the results of their
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 16 of 17
QA/QC activities and communicating with the Project QA Coordinator, who is responsible for
reporting to the ERG Local QA Coordinator.
1.4 ERG TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS SUPPORTED BY THE
QA/QC PROGRAM
ERG's QA/QC program, described in this QMP, is designed to ensure the quality of
services provided to clients in a wide variety of scientific, technical, and informational areas,
including Environmental Data Operations (EDOs) involving the collection, evaluation, and use
of environmental data. The QMP applies to all basic research, applied research, engineering,
modeling, design construct and/or operation of technology, method development, sampling and
analysis, secondary data use, database and software development, data review and validation,
scientific assessment, and training activities conducted by ERG. ERG's QA/QC program does
not, however, address quality-related activities for administrative areas of the company (e.g.,
human resources, facilities, accounting).
Not all elements of the QMP may be applicable to every project conducted by ERG. For
example, QC procedures applicable to environmental sampling are not be appropriate for a
project involving development of a training course or video. For work assignments involving
measurement activities, environmental data generation (e.g., surveys, field sampling) or
environmental data use, ERG develops a QAPP that meets requirements as defined by the client
in the applicable work orders or assignments.
1.4.1 Oversight of Subcontractor Activities
Subcontract agreements are issued to firms, and occasionally individuals, who perform
sections of ERG's prime contract scope of work at any dollar level. ERG demands the same
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 17 of 17
high level of quality and performance from subcontractors and consultants as it does from its
own employees, and subcontractors are bound by the same requirements and restrictions as ERG
under the Prime Contract. These agreements contain all required flowdowns of the prime
contract plus many flowdowns that pertain to the type of work to be performed, including any
requirements for QAPPs included in a specific work assignment.
The ERG Corporate QA Manager is responsible for verifying that subcontractor's quality
related procedures are adequate and executed. The Project Manager reviews the performance of
ERG subcontractors and consultants and does not approve the payment of invoices unless
subcontractor performance meets contract requirements.
1.4.2 Coordination of QA and QC Activities
The Corporate QA Manager is responsible for internal coordination of QA and QC
activities among the local offices, represented by the Local QA Coordinators. She also serves as
the Local QA Coordinator for the Lexington, MA, location. This coordination assures that
project-specific QA/QC programs are commensurate with project objectives and with ERG's QA
policy. The Local QA Coordinators, Mr. Andrew Burnette and Dr. Timothy DeFries (Austin,
TX), work directly with the Project Manager to ensure that each project has, as appropriate, a
Project QA Coordinator. Local QA Coordinators may serve as Project QA Coordinators,
facilitating this coordination.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 1
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 18 of 17
1.4.3 Management's Assurance that ERG's QA/QC System is Understood and
Implemented
ERG Management assures that applicable elements of ERG's QA/QC program are
understood and implemented in all programs that generate or use environmental data. Section 3,
below, discusses training conducted to ensure that staff understand ERG's QA/QC program. See
Section 9 for a discussion of the tools used to assess the implementation of ERG's QA/QC
program.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 1 of 15
SECTION 2
QUALITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS
2.1 INTRODUCTION
ERG is dedicated to providing quality services to our clients. Our success and growth
depend on our record of providing high-quality work, which encompasses delivering on time and
within budget what we promise and what our clients expect. This insistence on quality and
integrity is the foundation for establishing quality objectives for every project.
This section of the QMP describes the principal components of ERG's quality system and
defines who is responsible for managing and implementing each component of the system. This
section also identifies the tools used to implement each component of ERG's quality system.
The services ERG provides to our clients are organized as projects. Thus, ERG's quality system
consists of components that are applied to ERG as a whole and components applied to each
project. A project may comprise one or more related tasks or work assignments.
Components of ERG's corporate quality system include:
Quality System Documentation;
Quality System Annual Reviews and Planning;
Quality System Management Assessments; and
Training.
Section 2.2 contains a description of each of these components, management roles and
responsibilities in their implementation, and the tools used in their implementation.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 15
Components of ERG's project quality system include:
Project Quality Planning;
Project Quality Documentation;
Project Data Quality Assessment; and
Project Quality Assessment.
Section 2.3 contains a description of each of these components, management roles and
responsibilities in their implementation, and the tools used in their implementation.
2.2 ERG CORPORATE QUALITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS
This section describes the corporate quality system., specifically, management roles and
responsibilities in implementing the system and the tools used in its implementation.
2.2.1 ERG Corporate Quality System Documentation
Description: Documentation of the ERG corporate quality system is the written record of
the management systems and technical activities ERG uses to ensure the quality of the work
processes, products, and services we provide to our clients.
Roles and implementation responsibility: ERG's Corporate QA Manager, Arlene Levin,
is responsible for developing and documenting ERG's quality system in accordance with EPA
and other client QA policies and direction from ERG management. She is also responsible for
developing, reviewing, and revising the corporate QMP, the major tool used to document ERG's
quality system. The Local QA Coordinators are responsible for preparing new or revised
Standard Operating Procedures (see below). The cognizant ERG Confidential Business
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 15
Information (CBI) Document Control Officer is responsible for developing, reviewing, and
revising the statute-specific CBI plans ERG uses to manage CBI in our possession.
Tools for Implementing Corporate Quality System Documentation:
Quality Management Plan. The major tool for documenting ERG's corporate quality
system is the QMP. The QMP describes how ERG structures its quality system and describes
the general roles and responsibilities for staff and management. A QMP tailored to specific
contract requirements is prepared at the direction of our clients (see Section 2.4, below).
ERG's QMP is based on guidelines from American National Standard: QA Specifications
and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental
Technology Programs (ANSI/ASQC-E4) [dated 01/03/95], and EPA Requirements for Quality
Management Plans (EPA QA/R-2) [dated 03/20/01]. The ERG Corporate QA Manager reviews
this QMP at least annually and revises it as necessary. Revisions are made in order to clarify
roles and responsibilities, address problem areas, and to institutionalize improvements. The
QMP is also revised when existing functions that affect programs covered by the QMP are
reorganized, or if audits of the QA program determine that corrective actions are necessary.
When the QMP is revised, it is re-distributed to all Local QA Coordinators. The Local
QA Coordinators are responsible for ensuring that all ERG personnel performing work covered
by the QMP are notified of any changes and are informed of current requirements.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). SOPs are written instructions that document
a routine or repeated activity. SOPs detail work processes in order to facilitate consistent
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 15
conformance to technical and quality system requirements. Use of SOPs helps to ensure data
quality.
ERG's SOPs follow the guidelines and requirements stated in EPA Methods for Analysis
of Water and Waste, Standard Methods, SW-846, NIOSH, ASTM, and Guidance for the
Preparation of Standard Operating Procedures (QA/G-6) [dated March 2001]. SOPs are
developed for each analytical method (e.g., U. S. EPA Method 1613), engineering activity (e.g.,
calculations, spreadsheet data manipulation), or laboratory function (e.g., sample preparation,
maintaining a laboratory notebook). When the need for a new SOP is determined, the Local QA
Coordinator designates an appropriate individual to create needed SOPs, and reviews the draft
procedure or designates an appropriate technical reviewer. The Local QA Coordinator approves
the SOP after all peer reviewer comments are resolved, then circulates the approved SOP to
technical staff members, as discussed in Section 5.2.3 of the QMP.
Appropriate SOPs are identified in each QAPP. An index of ERG SOPs (which include
measurement and non-measurement related procedures) is included in Appendix A.
CBI Plans. ERG's procedures for handing CBI are documented in plans designed and
prepared by ERG based on requirements established by EPA. CBI Plans are approved by the
cognizant client CBI Document Control Officer. The plans are developed to meet the statutory
requirements under which EPA collected the CBI from the public. ERG has approved plans for
handling CBI in the Chantilly, VA; Morrisville, NC; and Lexington, MA offices.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 15
2.2.2 ERG Corporate Quality System Annual Reviews and Planning
Description: An annual, internal review of the corporate quality system to determine if
the quality system is implemented and is operating as prescribed in the QMP. Annually, plans
(including schedules and resource needs) are developed for implementing corrective actions and
quality system improvements identified during the quality system annual review.
Roles and implementation responsibility: The Corporate QA Manager is responsible for
ensuring that independent audits are conducted to determine the effectiveness of the ERG quality
system. Local QA Coordinators are responsible for reporting to the Corporate QA Manager
results of independent audits they have performed to determine the effectiveness of the ERG
quality system, management systems reviews, and independent project quality technical
assessments.
Tools for implementing Corporate Quality System Annual Review:
Quality System Compliance Checklist. This checklist details the required elements of
the management systems and technical activities specified in the QMP.
2.2.3 ERG Corporate Quality System Management Assessments
Description: Assessments of the ERG quality system to determine if the system
(management structure, policies, practices, and procedures) is adequate for ensuring the quality
of data operations conducted for our clients.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 6 of 15
Roles and implementation responsibility: Senior management, with input from QA staff
and project management, are responsible for conducting corporate quality system management
assessments.
Tools for implementing Corporate Quality System Management Assessments:
Client Satisfaction Survey. ERG asks our clients directly if they are satisfied with the
quality of our work. ERG President David Meyers or his designee calls Clients responsible for
our prime contracts every year to obtain their feedback on our services. Additionally, each year
an ERG senior manager calls each Client, Contract Officer, and Delivery Order/Work
Assignment Manager. The manager who makes the call is not involved with the contract, so the
clients may feel freer to assess ERG's performance from a broader perspective. We call our
clients to ask for their assessment of:
• The technical quality of our work;
• Whether ERG staff have been easy to work with;
• ERG's responsiveness to the client's concerns;
• Our adherence to schedules and budgets;
• What the client might like to see us do differently (how can we improve?); and
• Any other issues that need to be addressed.
In addition, we ask our clients if our overall performance has been excellent, good, fair,
or poor.
2.2.4 Training
Description: A centrally administered program of courses of broad or general
applicability, supplemented by additional job- and task-specific training coordinated at the local
level.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 15
Roles and implementation responsibility: An employee's supervisor is responsible for
defining the training requirements for specific jobs in each technical area. The Corporate QA
Manager and Local QA Coordinator are responsible for ensuring that all ERG project personnel
understand the ERG quality system, through training and access to QA policy and procedure
documents. Local QA Coordinators are responsible for training staff in QA/QC procedures.
Tools for implementing Corporate Quality System Training:
See Section 3.0 for a discussion of training conducted to ensure that staff understand
ERG's QA/QC program. Training tools include:
• Training in specific SOPs;
• On-the-job training;
• In-house training courses (e.g., Project Management Training and QA Training);
• Workshops;
• Classroom training programs; and
• Professional certification.
2.3 ERG PROJECT QUALITY SYSTEM COMPONENTS
Components of ERG's project quality system include planning, documentation, data
quality assessment, and project quality assessment. This section contains a description of each
of these components, management roles and responsibilities in their implementation, and the
tools used in their implementation.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 8 of 15
2.3.1 Project Quality Planning
Description: Project quality planning is the process of identifying the quality
requirements of the project work, and identifying the management structures and technical
activities used to ensure that products meet our clients needs and expectations.
Roles and implementation responsibilities: The Project Manager is responsible for the
quality of the work performed on each project, and he/she works with the client and with the
Local QA Coordinator to establish an appropriate QA/QC program for each project or work
assignment. The type of QA/QC program depends on the requirements specified by the client
and the intended use of the data or final report. The Project Manager and Local QA Coordinator
also decide if a Project QA Coordinator is needed.
Tools for implementing Project Quality Planning:
Work Plan. The work plan translates the client's needs into specifications for producing
the desired result. The work plan considers cost and schedule constraints and describes
acceptance criteria for the results or measures of performance. Frequently, the Work Plan is
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 15
accompanied by a QA narrative that specifies QA/QC parameters for the proposed project. For
projects that involve environmental data generation or use, ERG develops a QAPP.
QA Project Plan (QAPP). A QAPP, usually prepared in conjunction with a Sampling
and Analysis Plan or Laboratory Test Plan, details the QA/QC and other technical activities
necessary to ensure that the results of the work will satisfy the stated performance criteria.
QAPPs are always prepared for projects that involve original data gathering, generation, or
measurement, such as environmental sample collection and analysis. Projects that support
litigation, regulatory enforcement, human health studies and regulatory development contain the
standard elements listed in the EPA guidelines (EPA Requirements for QA Project Plans (QA/R-
5)) and address all quality issues associated with sample collection, analysis, data validation, and
reporting. Many procedures are standardized, such as sample collection and analysis, instrument
calibration, chain-of-custody procedures, and data validation procedures and calculations.
Research and Development projects follow applicable guidelines defined by the client, ERG QA
staff and scientific common sense. Project-specific QA objectives are developed, and any
constraints or adaptations to standard procedures are incorporated and reviewed prior to
conducting any field activities.
The Local QA Coordinator, independent of the project team, reviews and approves
QAPPs. The Project QA Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that a QAPP is prepared, and
that it meets the client's specifications. The Project QA Coordinator may prepare the QAPP
themselves, or it may be prepared by the project team (Program Manager, ERG Task Leader, or
a team member). If the project team prepares the QAPP, the Project QA Coordinator reviews it
and verifies that it meets the clients needs. The Local QA Coordinator approves the plan after all
peer reviewer and Project QA Coordinator reviewer comments are resolved. The Project QA
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 10 of 15
Coordinator verifies that the requirements of the approved QAPP are communicated to the
project team.
Data Quality Objectives. Data Quality Objectives are statements that clarify the
technical and quality objectives of a project, define the appropriate type of data, and specify
tolerable levels of decision errors that will be used as the basis for establishing the quality and
quantity of data needed to support decisions. The Data Quality Objectives Process is a
systematic strategic planning tool, based on scientific method, that identifies and defines the
type, quality, and quantity of data needed to satisfy a specified use. The key elements of the
Data Quality Objectives Process are:
Concisely defining the project objective;
Defining the boundaries of the study;
Identifying the decision to be made;
Identifying the key inputs to that decision;
Developing the decision rule;
Specifying tolerable limits on potential decision errors; and
Selecting the most resource-efficient data collection design
This Data Quality Objectives Process uses a graded approach, developing managerial
controls that are commensurate with the importance of the work and consequences of potential
decision errors (see Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process, EPA QA/G-4,
EPA/600/R-96/055). Applying this process results in data quality objectives as qualitative
and/or quantitative outputs. These parameters are derived in consultation with the client and are
defined for the client in a Work and/or Sampling and Analysis Plan and in the QAPP. The
parameters are defined internally for ERG staff through project instructions prepared for each
project to communicate requirements of a technical nature and in the areas of QA/QC.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 11 of 15
2.3.2 Project Quality Documentation
Description: An auditable trail that documents project quality planning, implementation,
and assessment. Includes plans, check-lists, sign-off sheets, review memoranda, and other
project-specified documentation.
Roles and implementation responsibility: The Program Manager is responsible for
ensuring that project quality documentation is produced and maintained.
Tools for implementing Project Quality Documentation:
Document Review Sign-Off Sheet. Document review sign-off sheets are used to
manage internal review of work assignment deliverables (memoranda, Sampling and Analysis
Plans, Sampling Episode Reports, technical and engineering assessments, etc.). They provide an
auditable trail of the sequence and nature of review performed for every deliverable. The Project
Manager, in conjunction with the ERG Task Leader, determines the level of review a document
receives based on its nature and scope. Reviewers sign off on the sheet only after they are
satisfied that their comments have been addressed. If errors are discovered during the review
process, corrections are made by the principal author and noted on the sign-off review sheet. An
error discovered after delivery is brought to the attention of the Project Manager. He/she
determines the severity of the error and its resolution, contacts the client to discuss the error and
resolution, and determines the level of review necessary to check the corrected deliverable.
2.3.3 Project Data Quality Assessment
Description: Data quality assessment is used to assess the type, quantity, and quality of
data in order to verify that the planning objectives, QAPP components, and sample collection
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 12 of 15
procedures were satisfied and that the data are suitable for their intended purpose. Data quality
assessment is a five-step procedure for determining statistically whether or not a data set is
suitable for its intended purpose. This assessment is a scientific and statistical evaluation of data
to determine if they are of the type, quantity, and quality needed and may be performed either
during a project to check the process of data collection or at the end of a project to check if
objectives were met.
Roles and implementation responsibility: A Data Quality Assessment may be performed
by a project team member, by the Local QA Coordinator, or his/her designee at any point in a
project in which data have been generated.
Tools for implementing Project Data Quality Assessment:
Graphical and statistical tools are used for project data quality assessment. Graphical
tools include, but are not limited to:
• Histogram/frequency plots;
• Box and whisker plots;
• Ranked data plots;
• Scatter plots;
• Time series plots, including correlograms; and
• Spacial plots.
Statistical tools used for project data quality assessment include, but are not limited to:
Hypothesis tests for a single population;
Hypothesis tests for comparing two populations; and
Regression analysis.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 13 of 15
2.3.4 Project Quality Assessment
Description: A project quality assessment determines if:
1) project work meets our clients' needs and expectations and the quality requirements
specified in the work plan; and
2) the management structures and technical activities specified in the work plan have
been implemented.
Roles and implementation responsibility: The Project Manager has primary responsibility
for assessing the quality of project work. Second assessments are made by a project's technical
reviewer(s). Assessments may also be performed by the Local QA Coordinator or his/her
designee.
Tools for implementing Project Quality Assessment
Technical Assessments. Technical assessments include initial (conceptual) review of
project plans, ongoing (developmental) review, and review of the final product. Initial review
evaluates the objectives, concepts, methods, logic, and form(s) of intermediate and final
products. Ongoing developmental reviews look at the intermediate products as they evolve from
draft stages into final form. ERG performs reviews in-house and also solicits intermediate or
developmental review from clients.
The use of technical reviewers is an essential part of ensuring scientific and technical
QC. A technical reviewer is a qualified senior staff member who is not directly involved in the
work assignment. He/she typically reviews the work assignment:
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 14 of 15
At the work plan stage, addressing whether the conceptual approaches are
fundamentally sound to meet the project objectives;
At key interim milestones to determine if the project team is still on target; and
Prior to submission of draft and final products to determine if the objectives have
been fulfilled in a technically sound manner.
Each work assignment product or task is assigned a technical reviewer in the work plan
and his or her participation is budgeted as a line item cost. The responsibilities of a technical
reviewer include an initial review of the project plan, to ensure that:
Project goals are well-defined, realistic, and appropriate to meet the needs of the
client;
The approach proposed to meet the goals is reasonable and likely to result in a
successful project; and
The necessary resources in terms of time, dollars, and staff are dedicated to the
project.
A thorough technical review is performed on all work products prior to submission of
draft and final products.
In addition to on-going technical review, periodic quality reviews are conducted by
senior management to assess the work being directed by their staff members. These reviews
focus on continuous improvement efforts; whether a current, detailed project plan is in place;
whether recent deliverables have been peer-reviewed and submitted on time and within budget;
and whether the Project Management Team is soliciting and responding to client feedback. See
Section 9.2.3 for additional discussion of senior technical management's formal project review.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 2
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 15 of 15
2.4 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
ERG's QMP is based on guidelines from American National Standard: Specifications
and Guidelines for Quality Systems for Environmental Data Collection and Environmental
Technology Programs (ANSI/ASQC-E4) [dated 01/03/95], and EPA Requirements for Quality
Management Plans (QA/R-2) [dated 03/20/01). The ERG Corporate QA Manager reviews this
QMP at least annually and revises it as necessary.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: Iof9
SECTION 3
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION AND TRAINING
This section documents ERG's procedures for assuring that all our employees have the
necessary skills to accomplish their work effectively. The procedures described in this section
include ERG's approach to hiring and training of staff, conducting performance reviews and
evaluations, and performing routine health examinations of employees who work with hazardous
materials.
3.1 ERG TRAINING POLICY
It is ERG's policy to identify QA and QC training needs for all levels of management
and staff, and to provide resources for this training. The goal of this training is to
assure that QA and QC responsibilities and requirements are understood at every stage
of project implementation. The ultimate responsibility for ensuring that training needs
are identified and appropriately addressed rests with ERG senior management,
specifically ERG President David Meyers and the Corporate QA Manager, Arlene
Levin.
3.2 DETERMINATION OF INITIAL CAPABILITY
Technical staff managers at ERG must recruit top-quality people, know the capabilities of
their staff, and match the skills of their staff to the specific needs of their projects. Senior
technical staff managers work together to define future project needs in terms of both the
numbers and the capabilities of people required to perform the work. Staff are selected for their
qualifications for specific technical areas, as well as for their ability to function effectively as
members of a project team.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 9
ERG has well-established procedures to ensure that all newly hired employees have
excellent technical skills and can function effectively as members of a project team. Procedures
used to identify potential scientific and technical staff include:
Screening potential candidates during an on-campus interview or by phone to
assess their interests, background, personal characteristics, and technical and
communication skills. Before ERG invites a candidate for an interview, the
manager responsible for the hiring process reviews academic transcripts.
During the interview on site, eight to ten ERG staff members at a variety of
technical levels in the organization speak with the candidate. The candidate also
makes a formal presentation focusing on a specific example of past technical
work and provides a writing sample related to the work to allow technical
managers within ERG to evaluate whether the candidate has the necessary
communication skills and technical judgment to be effective in the company's
project-oriented environment.
After the interview and presentation, the technical manager in charge of hiring
consults with the candidate's references about any concerns identified in the
interview. No candidate receives a job offer from ERG unless the majority of the
people participating in the interview feel that he/she would be a valuable member
of the staff.
3.3 TRAINING
ERG ensures that personnel have the knowledge and skill necessary to complete our
client's projects. Employment at ERG entails a career-long educational process, beginning with
new employee training and continuing through training in project management and specific
technical activities. Employees receive additional training as their job descriptions and
responsibilities change and evolve and as new technology is introduced.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 9
3.3.1 Training of New Employees
All new employees attend a general orientation and receive on-the-job training specific to
their areas of responsibility. General orientation addresses the motivating principles and
concepts underlying the company's approach to quality as well as technical and managerial
precepts fundamental to conducting business at ERG. All employees engaged in field sampling
activities receive an initial 40 hours of training in hazard identification and safe work practices,
with an annual 8-hour refresher course.
3.3.2 Training Needs Identification
An employee's supervisor is responsible for defining the training requirements for
specific jobs in each technical area. These requirements are communicated through technical
managers, who monitor attendance at training sessions and who ensure that their staff are
adequately informed about the codes and standards necessary to perform the work. Orientation
activities are scheduled as required for specific programs, either as a continuing series of training
seminars or under the supervision of a senior technical staff member. Training commonly
provided at ERG, with the employees required to participate is listed in the table below.
Employee Responsibilities
Work with CBI
Work managing projects
Work at hazardous waste sites
Holding security clearances
Related Training
Required training supported by annual refresher
courses
ERG Project Manager Course
OSHA-mandated 40-hour HAZWOPER instructional
courses, followed by annual refresher sessions
Initial briefing followed by periodic security
education and awareness programs
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 9
3.3.3 Training Courses and Programs
At ERG, our objective is to ensure that the quality of technical services is consistent
regardless of who does the work or which office performs the task. This degree of
standardization requires a training program that is flexible enough to meet the diverse needs of a
number of different technical service areas, while ensuring that all employees receive the
necessary training appropriate for their specific work area. ERG's corporate training program
includes a centrally-administered program of courses of broad or general applicability,
supplemented by additional job- and task-specific training coordinated at the local level.
At the corporate level, ERG offers a diversity of training courses open to all employees.
Individual courses range in duration from single classes (e.g., hazard communication training,
CPR training, confidential business information training) to those which meet weekly for several
months (e.g., Project Management, Application of Statistics). Through these courses, ERG
ensures that managers and technical personnel develop not only the technical skills to do their
jobs, but also the management and communication skills required to perform their jobs with
excellence.
A coordinator is assigned for each course and given responsibility for securing meeting
space, for making the necessary arrangements for audio-visual aids or other special equipment,
and for enlisting instructors. Announcements of upcoming classes are included as a regular
agenda item in managers' meetings. While employee participation in many of the offered
courses is voluntary, specific training may be required of an employee before he/she is permitted
to perform certain tasks.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 9
In addition to centrally-administered corporate training courses, each technical group
defines supplemental training requirements commensurate with its specific technical activities.
The Project Managers are responsible for developing and implementing training programs to
meet these requirements. These training efforts typically include some combination of the
following:
Training in specific SOPs;
On-the-job training;
In-house training courses;
Workshops;
Classroom training programs; and
Professional certification.
In addition to a formal management training program, ERG has an active technical
seminar program. Topics are selected based on their relevance to ongoing project work
conducted by ERG for EPA and other clients. In our Morrisville Laboratory, technical seminars
focus on improving measurements performance on the Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP).
A second aspect of the technical seminar program is designed to give employees in
various groups an opportunity to make presentations to their co-workers on the objectives,
approach, and results of their work. Scheduled on a frequent basis, these seminars cover an
array of topics and often incorporate briefings from employees on recent off site training that aid
staff in completion of project objectives. This program enables ERG's technical staff members to
refine their presentation skills in front of a group and affords managers another mechanism for
reviewing work results and for promoting cross-training of staff.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 6 of 9
3.3.4 Documentation of Training
Records of attendance and compliance with educational activities are maintained in the
personnel office along with other personnel records.
3.3.5 Retraining
ERG's training program is intended to ensure that all personnel have the necessary level
of experience or training to enable them to competently perform designated tasks. A new job
description, the introduction of new technology, or a change in responsibilities may result in a
lack of knowledge, skills, or abilities needed to perform a job successfully . When this situation
arises, staff are trained in the new requirements.
3.4 FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS FOR SPECIALIZED
ACTIVITIES
ERG ensures that personnel have and maintain the appropriate statutory and regulatory
qualifications necessary to execute project work for our clients. Listed below is a summary of
regulations pertinent to specific work areas:
OSHA Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR 1910). OSHA regulations specify
the general industry safety standards applicable to all workplaces. In addition, the
OSHA standards contain Subpart Z, "Toxic and Hazardous Substances," which
includes standards for handling specific chemicals classified as occupational
carcinogens. A generic form of these standards has been developed by ERG and
is the basis for all procedures for handling toxic chemicals. Recently included in
Subpart Z (1900.1200) is a set of standards on communicating information
involving hazards to employees. The system in place at ERG exceeds those
requirements.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 9
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The regulations promulgated
under RCRA define the requirements for management, storage, transportation,
and disposal of hazardous wastes.
International Air Transport Association (IATA). The IATA regulations govern
shipments of hazardous materials in international airspace. Shipments with both
national and international routes must comply with U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) and IATA regulations.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). NRC regulations are applicable to the
operation and monitoring of equipment containing radioactive sources.
Radioactively labeled chemicals are also regulated by NRC, DOT, and by the
states.
Other Regulatory Requirements. Several federal agencies have developed
specific guidelines and protocols for laboratory operations involving carcinogens
and other hazardous materials. These guidelines and protocols comprise a
significant portion of ERG's hazardous materials safety and health program.
ERG complies with or exceeds all the following:
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), "Safety Standards for Research Involving
Chemical Carcinogens," NIH 76-900,
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), "Guidelines for the Laboratory Use of
Chemical Carcinogens," NIH 81-2385,
- Department of Health and Human Services, "Guidelines for the Laboratory Use
of Chemical Substances Posing a Potential Occupational Carcinogenic Risk",
- National Toxicology Program (NTP), "Health and Safety Minimum
Requirements for Bioassay Laboratories," updated to the current "Health and
Safety Minimum Requirements for Support Contractors",
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), "Working with
Carcinogens",
- NIOSH, "A Management Guide to Carcinogens," NIOSH 77-205,
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 8 of 9
- NIOSH, "Safety and Health Manual", and
- "Lab Safety at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)," CDC76-8118.
3.5 EVIDENCE OF PERSONNEL JOB PROFICIENCY
The annual performance evaluation for all employees is another important component of
ERG's quality system. Through this process, ERG recognizes the good work of employees and
identifies areas that need improvement. In private discussions, staff members and their direct
supervisors establish training needs and identify personal performance goals for the coming year.
They also hold performance and goal-achievement evaluations throughout the year.
Objective evidence of personnel job proficiency is obtained in a variety of ways,
depending on the employee's assignment. For example, initial determination of an employee's
ability to perform specific technical procedures, such as physical or chemical measurements,
typically involves repeated measurements of a reference material according to a Standard
Operating Procedure. The employee must demonstrate acceptable performance, usually in terms
of pre-established limits for measurement accuracy and reproducibility, in order to be certified
by the technical manager to perform the test routinely. Results of these demonstrations are
maintained by the technical manager.
3.6 PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS AND EXAMINATIONS
ERG provides annual medical examinations for employees working with hazardous
materials. Medical examinations are provided every three years for other employees engaged in
field sampling. Medical doctors who specialize in occupational medicine perform a baseline
evaluation of new employees, which includes extensive blood and urine chemistry plus
cardiovascular, pulmonary, hearing, and vision tests. The initial examination provides a written
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 3
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 9
assessment of the employee's physical ability to perform certain assigned tasks and identifies
any limitations. Periodic follow-up examinations allow monitoring of potential physiological
effects caused by exposure to workplace hazards and provide continuing assurance that an
employee's physical condition is adequate to deal with the physical requirements associated with
certain types of work. ERG's personnel office maintains employee medical records for a
minimum of 30 years.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 1 of 13
SECTION 4
PROCUREMENT OF ITEMS AND SERVICES
This section describes ERG's processes for reviewing and approving procurement
documents for purchased items and subcontracted services, and also describes ERG's processes
for reviewing and approving responses to solicitations and for ensuring that procured items and
services are of acceptable quality.
4.1 INTRODUCTION: ERG's PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES
ERG has developed internal procurement procedures to standardize operations, meet
government requirements, and provide day-to-day guidance in five areas:
General procedures;
Contracts/sub contracts;
Purchasing;
Receiving; and
Government property control.
These procedures also ensure that purchased items and services are of acceptable quality.
ERG's Purchasing System, detailed in the ERG Procurement Manual, was reviewed by Defense
Contract Management Command in April 1999 during ERG's first Contractor Purchasing
System Review (CPSR). ERG received U.S. governmental approval for its purchasing system in
a letter dated July 9, 1999, from Cassandra B. Bain, EPA, to David Meyers, ERG.
Procurement activities at ERG are led by the corporate Procurement Officer, Craig Pilon,
who oversees contract managers and contract specialists, as well as all purchasing and related
operations. ERG's contract managers assist project staff in defining procurement requirements
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 13
and choosing an appropriate procurement document. The ERG contract managers also generate
and approve Subcontracts, Consulting Agreements, and other related agreements that may be
required, such as licenses, confidentiality agreements, etc., and verify that these documents
clearly describe quality requirements.
The objectives of ERG's procurement organization are to acquire supplies and services
responsibly and to meet federal requirements for competitive bidding, record maintenance and
justification, and small/minority business contracting.
As a government contractor, ERG is responsible for spending taxpayers' dollars wisely,
promoting small, disadvantaged, woman-owned and HUBZone businesses, and maintaining
records justifying its actions. These records are subject to review by three agencies: the Defense
Contract Management Command, the Small Business Administration, and the Defense Contract
Administration Agency, and a cognizant agency, the U.S. EPA.
4.2 PROCUREMENT PLANNING AND CONTROL
ERG's procedures for planning and controlling the procurement of items and services are
addressed in detail in The ERG Procurement Manual. The contents of the manual are listed in
Table 4-1.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 13
Table 4-1
Contents of ERG Procurement Manual
Title
Quick Start
• Purpose
• Applicability
• Standards of Conduct
• The Procurement Process
• Flow Chart
• Structure of The Procurement Organization
• Defining Your Requirement
• Direct v. Indirect Purchasing
• Purchasing for Overhead, G&A, and Service Center Accounts
• Deciding Whether to Rent, Lease, or Purchase
• Blanket Purchase Agreements
• Obtaining Labor Services
(Temporary Agencies, Independent Contractors, Subcontractors and
Consultants)
• Selecting an Agreement Type
• U.S. Government Sources of Supply and Rates
• Selecting a Vendor, Subcontractor, or Consultant
• Determining if Prices are Reasonable
• Clauses for Subcontracts, Consulting Agreements, and Purchase Orders
• Obtaining Travel Services
• Achieving and Reporting Subcontracting Goals
• Government Property
• Inspection and Acceptance
Subcontract and Purchase Order Administration
Vendor Data Base
Paying Vendors
Definitions
Forms
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 13
The general steps of the procurement process are:
1. Proj ect staff identify the need. After reviewing the client's statement of work,
project staff identify what products and/or services will be required to accomplish
it. They also identify long-lead items and services in order to establish a
timetable for procurements.
2. The Project Manager, and Contract Manager decide whether the need can be
filled by in-house resources, team subcontractors, or should be acquired from
outside sources. For services, they identify the technical qualifications and
expertise required. They also identify any specific quality standards that are
required.
3. The Proj ect Manager, and Contract Manager decide what method should be used
to fill the need — use of an existing vendor relationship such as a Blanket
Purchase Agreement (BPA) or initiation of a new solicitation.
4. Project staff draft the solicitation. The degree of complexity of the procurement
method should be directly related to the complexity, quality requirements, and
dollar value of the requirement.
5. The Contract Manager reviews, approves, and issues the solicitation. With the
Contract Manager's approval, project staff may solicit bids from suppliers (e.g.,
obtain phone quotations).
6. The Project Manager evaluates the offers. A combination of technical quality,
schedule, location, price and other variables will be combined to determine which
proposal will best meet ERG's needs. Negotiate, where applicable, treating
offerers equally and fairly.
7. The Project Manager documents the procurement process and award decision.
8. The Contract Manager obtains necessary ERG and client authorizations, and issue
the appropriate procurement document (Subcontract, Consulting Agreement, or
Purchase Order).
9. The subcontractor begins work and completes performance. The ERG Project
Manager manages changes to the work in the same businesslike, cost-effective,
and fair manner as the initial procurement process.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 13
10. The Project Manager closes out the procurement by inspection/acceptance of the
work product, payment of final invoices, and preparation of required
administrative paperwork.
4.3 PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL AND QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
This section presents procedures for ensuring that procurement documents adequately
specify quality requirements.
4.3.1 Types of Procurement Documents Used By ERG
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) considers any contracts or contractual actions
entered into by ERG to furnish supplies or services for performance of a prime contract a
"subcontract". ERG uses three basic types of procurement documents, all of which are
"subcontracts" according to the above definition:
Purchase Orders (POs): POs are used to initiate purchases of standard commercial
items (and occasionally services). POs contain standard ERG terms and conditions and minimal
flowdown requirements from the FAR. To initiate a PO, the ERG Requestor completes a
Purchase Request, has it signed by the cognizant ERG Manager, attaches the necessary addenda,
and submits it to the Contract Manager in his/her division.
Consulting Agreements: Consulting Agreements are used for individuals, and
occasionally firms, who are providing advisory or review services relating to ERG's statement of
work at any dollar level. Consulting Agreements contain all required prime contract flowdown
clauses and the basic clauses necessary to protect ERG's and the Government's/Client's
interests. Consulting Agreements are designed for work that is limited in scope or length,
usually takes place at the Consultant's location, has minimal reporting required, and involves
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 6 of 13
minimal risk to ERG or the Consultant. The ERG Contract Manager for each division issues or
authorizes Consulting Agreements.
Subcontracts: Subcontract Agreements are issued to firms, and occasionally individuals,
who perform sections of ERG's prime contract scope of work at any dollar level. Because of the
need for the Subcontractor to be bound by the same requirements and restrictions as ERG under
the Prime Contract, and because of the increased risk associated with extended or on-site work,
these agreements contain all required flowdowns of the prime contract plus many flowdowns
that pertain to the type of work to be performed. In addition, the roles and responsibilities of
ERG and the Subcontractor are more carefully defined, to avoid potential misunderstanding or
disputes. The ERG Contract Manager for each division issues subcontracts.
ERG has developed efficient and cost-effective procedures for placing and administering
subcontracts and hiring consultants. ERG demands the same high level of quality and
performance from subcontractors and consultants as it does from its own employees. Whenever
a particular task requires a specialty that must be obtained (or that can be more cost-effectively
obtained) from outside the company, the Project Manager selects, retains, and supervises a
subcontractor or consultant. ERG's Contracts Department oversees the subcontracting process
to ensure that all standards of the federal government are met.
ERG is dedicated to delivering high quality work products that may be used without fear
of challenges related to Conflict of Interest (COI). Thus, like ERG, our subcontractors and
consultants have no relationships with companies, individuals, or trade associations in the areas
covered under a particular work assignment that would impair their objectivity or prevent them
from providing impartial assistance or that would constitute an apparent COI. In general, if we
discover any real or apparent COI, we do not allow the firm or the individual to participate in the
work assignment unless otherwise instructed by the government.
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 13
To monitor the compliance of our subcontractors and consultants with the COI clauses
contained in our prime contract (and which are passed on to the subcontractors through flow-
down clauses in their subcontract agreements), ERG requires that each subcontractor sign a work
assignment COI certification, and that this certification be returned to ERG before commencing
work on the work assignment. This COI certification process provides ERG with an ongoing
mechanism for monitoring adherence to COI provisions. In addition, ERG requests that the
subcontractor certify that it has informed its personnel of their obligation to report personal and
organizational COI.
To initiate a Consulting Agreement or Subcontract Agreement, the ERG Requestor
completes a Purchase Request form, attaches the necessary addenda, has it signed by the
cognizant Manager, and submits it to the ERG Contract Manager for his/her division.
4.3.2 Procedures for Review, Approval, and Ensuring Adequacy of Procurement
Documents
To ensure that procurement documents are accurate, complete, and clearly describe the
item or service needed and the associated technical and quality requirements, ERG has
developed written procurement procedures, specified in The ERG Procurement Manual.
Authority to sign procurement documents is limited to a few specified individuals. These
individuals are responsible for ensuring that all the procedures specified in The ERG
Procurement Manual have been followed.
Procurement documents clearly describe the item or service needed. ERG's procurement
procedures require the employee requesting the purchase of an item or service to establish a clear
statement of work (SOW), special technical requirements, necessary reporting, quality
requirements, transportation, packing and packaging requirements, and schedule. When
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 8 of 13
applicable, the SOW includes a quality system consistent with EPA requirements. When
required by the work assignment, the SOW includes preparation of a QAPP according to EPA
Requirements for QA Project Plans (QA/R-5) [dated 03/20/01].
The Purchase Order or Subcontract SOW describes how ERG verifies that suppliers have
conformed to ERG's requirements, with provisions for ERG to inspect and accept, within a
reasonable period of time, the item or service prior to payment.
The ERG Procurement Manual includes a pre-purchase checklist to help procurement
requestors clearly define their purchase requirements.
4.3.3 Review and Approval of Responses to Solicitations
The Project Managers review quotations or proposals for the procurement, and identify
responses that satisfy all technical and quality requirements and select a supplier. The project
staff document this selection in a written source selection analysis, using a standard format, that
is signed by the Project Manager and remains in the procurement file.
4.3.4 Requirement for Suppliers to Demonstrate Capability
ERG uses the following steps to evaluate suppliers' capabilities.
Where a prime contract has been awarded to ERG, the first priority for awarding work
under that prime contract goes to the team subcontractors whose qualifications and staff have
been established in the initial procurement process. Team subcontractors whose proposals have
led to an award under a competitive procurement are considered to have been competitively-
procured, provided their rates and fee are consistent with the proposal that led to the award. If
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 13
team subcontractors are able to perform the requirement and provide a reasonable cost estimate
(within the constraints of their prime contract bid and team subcontract with ERG), no further
competition or solicitation is necessary.
If team subcontractors are not qualified to perform the work, ERG identifies other
subcontractors using our internal supplier list, then outside sources such as the SBA's Pro-Net
database or referrals from the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization at the
Contracting Agency. The ERG Project Manager establishes subcontractor capabilities by
reviewing ERG's Supplier Procurement History file; obtaining resumes of professional
personnel; researching the technical and business reputation of a company; and, where
appropriate, checking the past performance references.
Prior to award of a Subcontract or Consulting Agreement, the Contract Manager making
the award checks the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Non-Procurement
Programs (www.arnet.gov) to ensure that the vendor that has been selected is not suspended or
debarred from Government contracting.
4.4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT SPECIFICATION, REVIEW, AND CHANGES
As discussed in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 above, The ERG Procurement Manual documents
the procedures that ERG uses to prepare and review procurement documents, and to ensure that
they are accurate, complete, and conform to EPA's requirements. The technical requirements of
a procurement document are defined by the requestor and reviewed and approved by the
technical Project Manager. The Contract Manager identifies the corporate and flowdown clause
requirements of the procurement and works closely with the technical Project Manager to assure
that it meets the technical and administrative goals as established at the onset. Only Contract
Managers, the ERG Purchasing Officer, and ERG Officers have authority to approve
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 10 of 13
Subcontracts and Consulting Agreements. Prior to approval, these individuals ensure that all the
authorizations and backup required in The ERG Procurement Manual and by the client Prime
Contract have been obtained or completed.
4.4.1 Review of Changed Procurement Documents
All ERG Subcontracts and Consulting Agreements contain general terms and conditions
of sale that include, among other things, provisions for changing or stopping work. When
formalized, a change is incorporated in a modification to the subcontract.
Where the scope of work changes during performance, or where factors outside the
subcontractor's or ERG's control intervene, careful documentation is made as to the nature of
the change, the vendor's/subcontractor's proposed price to implement the change, and the
negotiation process that transpired prior to Subcontract modification. Only the Contract
Manager is authorized to modify, or approve modification of, a Subcontract or Consulting
Agreement.
4.5 ENSURING THAT PROCURED ITEMS AND SOURCES ARE OF
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY
Procured items and services are reviewed by the requestor to ensure compliance with
requirements and specifications. Approval by the ERG Project Manager or his/her designee is
required before invoices are paid.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 11 of 13
4.5.1 Inspection and Acceptance
Purchase Orders and Subcontracts for items or services to be delivered to ERG contain
the quality requirements to which the items or service is to conform and provisions for ERG to
inspect and accept, within a reasonable period of time, the item or service prior to payment.
Prime contracts with EPA specify quality requirements and inspection/acceptance points.
Purchase Orders and Subcontracts are tailored to reflect the quality requirements and
inspection/acceptance criteria of the prime contract.
In defining requirements, ERG Requestors carefully review what types of quality
specifications are appropriate to a Purchase Order or Subcontract and indicate the QA
requirement in the Purchase Request. ERG Requestors ensure that all products and services
ordered have been inspected and accepted prior to payment of vendor invoices.
ERG requests warranties, when they are appropriate to the supply/service required;
however, the cost of warranties, if priced separately, is evaluated in light of the anticipated
period of use, repair costs, complexity, and other variables.
4.6 EVALUATION OF SUBCONTRACTOR AND CONSULTANT PERFORMANCE
Subcontractors and consultants are under the direct supervision of the Project Manager,
who ensures that project goals are met. The Project Manager evaluates all subcontractor and
consultant deliverables. ERG may also audit facilities of subcontractors or consultants that
collect environmental data or measurements. The subcontractor or consultant may be subject to
a performance evaluation audit by ERG project staff or by the QA Coordinator. A subcontractor
or consultant producing data for ERG may be subject to a data quality audit.
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 12 of 13
4.6.1 Paying Suppliers of Items and Services
ERG pays most suppliers within the latter of: 1) 30 days from receipt of a correct invoice,
or 2) 30 days from product/service acceptance. The payment terms and invoicing address appear
in all ERG Purchase Orders, Subcontracts, and Consulting Agreements. For supplies/services
ordered via a Purchase Order, the requestor (or designee):
• Marks invoice receipt date on invoice;
• Assures that supplies/services have been received/performed and are accepted by
ERG;
• Verifies that the amount invoiced matches the amount ordered;
• Prepares an ERG Voucher, and attaches the original invoice; and
• Has the Voucher signed by the ERG manager with budgetary responsibility.
For supplies/services ordered via Subcontracts and Consulting Agreements, the Division
Contracts staff (based on the location of the Project Manager, the order of these steps may vary):
• Log the invoice receipt date on Subcontractor/Consultant invoice;
• Send the invoice to the ERG Project Manager for approval that the work has been
performed, hours delivered, products received, etc.;
• Check the invoice against the Subcontract/Consulting Agreement Terms using the
Invoice Checklist;
• Prepare/review a Voucher form with invoice information;
• Log the invoice in the Subcontract File, and document payment in the Subcontract
records (applicable only to files not maintained in Lexington office); and
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 4
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 13 of 13
• Approve the invoice by signing on the Voucher, and forward invoice plus
supporting documentation to Accounts Payable for payment.
All Vouchers have the signature of the ERG manager with budgetary responsibility to
authorize payment. Vouchers for Subcontracts and Consulting Agreements are also approved by
ERG Contracts staff prior to payment.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 1 of 14
SECTION 5
DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS
This section of the QMP describes ERG's controls for quality-related documents and
records related to the ERG corporate quality system and describes ERG's controls for documents
and records related to ERG projects.
5.1 IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF RECORDS
As described below, ERG's quality-related documents are associated with the corporate
quality system or individual projects.
5.1.1 Corporate Quality System Documents and Records
Documents and records related to the ERG quality system include the documentation
described in Section 2.2.1, and the output of quality system assessments described in Section 9.
The Corporate QA Manager is responsible for identifying quality system documents that require
control. These documents include, but are not limited to:
Quality Management Plan;
Standard Operating Procedures;
Confidential Business Information Plans; and
Assessments of ERG's Quality Assessment, including related checklists.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 14
5.1.2 Project Documents and Records
Technical activities generate reports, supporting documentation, and analytical data.
This information is organized in project files to facilitate retrieval and to maintain security and
confidentiality. The Project Manager is responsible for identifying project documents that
require control. Project files are organized into the following categories:
Work Plan;
Sampling Plan, if applicable;
QA Project Plan;
Project Instructions;
Original data and calculations;
Technical reports;
Project quality assessments;
Correspondence; and
Progress, draft, and final reports.
Project documentation can be 1) paper (hard) copies, for example, correspondence and
field notes; 2) computer files, for example, databases and web applications; or 3) records that can
be maintained in both forms, for example, the word processing file and the hard copy document
printed from it.
5.2 GENERATION OF RECORDS
Quality-related records generated at ERG include project records and corporate quality
system records (e.g., SOPs and QMPs).
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 14
5.2.1 Project Records
The Project Manager is responsible for reviewing project documents and records to
verify their conformance to technical requirements and quality system requirements. This
review is conducted using selected project quality assessment tools described in Section 9. The
project work plan (and QAPP if required) designates the work processes and assessment tools
used on the project. The Project Manager is also responsible for ensuring that records and
documents accurately reflect completed work.
Project QA planning documents designating responsibilities and specifications for quality
are reviewed and signed by all accountable project employees.
Records of engineering calculations document each step with supporting references, key
assumptions, professional engineering judgments, equations, or engineering fundamentals. The
calculations are signed or initialed by the engineer who completed them, then checked, and after
discrepancies are resolved, are signed by a qualified project team member.
All records generated by measurement activities are signed or initialed by the person
performing the work and are reviewed by an appropriate supervisor. Measurement results
become part of a project report which is reviewed by an ERG technical reviewer. All laboratory
notebook records are kept in black ink, dated and signed by the person making the entries, and
routinely reviewed and approved by the appropriate supervisor, as evidenced by his/her initials
and date of inspection. Laboratory notebook maintenance procedures are regulated by a SOP,
which is followed by all laboratory staff.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 14
If corrections to laboratory records are necessary, the individual making the correction
must provide a reason, which is maintained with the original data. He/she signs and dates the
correction in black ink and transmits it to the appropriate project staff. Corrected laboratory
reports identify the original data along with the corrected data report.
5.2.2 Corporate Quality System Records (SOPs and QMP)
As discussed in Section 1.2.1, the Corporate QA Manager is responsible for developing
and revising the corporate QMP. The QMP is reviewed and approved by ERG President David
Meyers and the Local QA Coordinators. The Corporate QA Manager is responsible for issuing
the revised document to staff and ensuring that obsolete documentation is removed from the
ERG Intranet.
As discussed in Sections 1.2.2 and 2.2.1, the Local QA Coordinators are responsible for
designating an appropriate individual to create SOPs, needed at their location, reviewing the
draft procedure or designating an appropriate technical reviewer, circulating the approved SOP
to technical staff members; and maintaining copies of SOPs pertaining to the ERG location in a
central filing system.
5.2.3 Quality System Document Control
ERG has developed and instituted document control mechanisms for the review, revision,
and distribution of the QMP and QAPPs. Annually, the Corporate QA Manager reviews the
QMP, and the document is revised as necessary. Two versions of the QMP are then circulated, a
"Distribution Copy" and an "Information Copy." Distribution copies feature a unique serial
number on the cover corresponding to a distribution list maintained by the QA staff. Whenever
revisions are made, everyone on the distribution list receives the latest revision with their
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 14
assigned serial number. Information copies have no specific designations, and their status is not
tracked or updated.
Each QAPP has a signed approval form, title page, table of contents, and EPA-approved
document control format (shown below) that appears in the upper right-hand corner of each
page:
Section No.
Revision No.
Date
Page No. - of —_
QAPPs also contain a distribution list, including subcontractors and consultants as applicable.
During the course of the project, any revision to the QAPP is circulated to everyone on the
distribution list.
Another document control mechanism addresses SOPs, CBI, contracts, correspondence,
and reports. SOPs are company-confidential, prepared and filed by individual laboratories or
groups and maintained in a central filing system controlled by the Local QA Coordinator. Each
SOP has a signed title page and document control format, as depicted in Figure 5-1.
Internal QA audit reports are maintained by the Local QA Coordinator at the site where
the audit occurs and are indexed according to date and area of the audit. QA audit reports from
external agencies are indexed according to a year-based sequential numbering system that is also
cross-referenced by areas audited and by auditing agency. These files are maintained by ERG's
Contracts Office.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
fc^ i-rv^ CONFIDENTIAL
vERG
STANDARD
OPERATING
PROCEDURES
ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE DIVISION
GROUP: Morrisville Measurements Group
TITLE Standard Operating Procedure for the
Analysis of Tenax® Tubes According to
EPA Method TO- I/TO- 17
Procedure No: ERG-MOR-006 5-6
REVISION NO.: 0
EFFECTIVE
DATE:
SUPERSEDES: N/A
REFERENCES:
ERG-MOR-005, ERG-MOR-010, ERG-MOR-023
SATELLITE FILES:
Chromatography Laboratory, Mass Spectrometry Laboratory
REASON FOR REVISION:
Original
1.0 PURPOSE
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted into the atmosphere from a variety of sources including industrial and commercial
facilities, hazardous waste storage facilities, and vehicular traffic. Many of these organic compounds are toxic. Knowledge of the
levels of such toxic VOCs in the atmosphere is required in order to determine human health impacts.
Conventional air monitoring methods such as those used for workspace monitoring have relied on carbon adsorption approaches with
subsequent solvent desorption. Solvent desorption techniques allow injection of only a small portion (tidally 5-7%) of the sample
into the analytical system. This dilution factor is prohibitive for performing successful analysis of...
•f •'
l^@>fa£&^
3SZ2/0&
ACTIVITY MANAGER: QUALITY ASSURANCE
NAME/DATE ^^ COORDINATOR: NAME/DATE
^£j&)&\ yr^^^ftxviju T-^^L^&*U /oz-^^^cca^
' cO\^\oo ° -u^^ aJaa/.0
V 1 /
MANAGER:
NAKTETtpATE » Sf .rt
C^u^ VyG-te4^
fl 3/£*t/'fin (/
^^/ &* *-S / ** *s
' f
Figure 5-1. SOP Title Page
C/se or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 14
5.3 PROJECT RECORD MAINTENANCE
This section describes ERG's procedures for managing records for active and inactive
projects. Records include paper files, electronic files, and documentation of project quality
assessment. Paper files (hard copies) include: letters, memoranda, reports, notes, telecons,
calculation sheets, spreadsheet printouts, database printouts, and e-mail printouts. Electronic
files include spreadsheets, databases, software programs, models, electronic messages, and
electronic copies of text and figures.
Laboratory data are logged by date according to project. Laboratory data include
analytical results and all supporting information, including calibrations, QC data for analysis of
samples, and raw data. Every project conducted in the laboratory has individual files. These
files contain chain-of-custody documentation (if appropriate), project instructions, project notes
about the data, and copies of any final data reports.
5.3.1 Organization
A unique project charge number is assigned upon receipt of the work assignment or
technical directive and is used to track all labor and material costs associated with the project.
This number is also used on all project files. If laboratory analysis is required, a laboratory
subtask is created using the same number, and all resulting data and analyses are indexed
according to the project and task number. QC records are maintained by the Project Manager
according to project number.
Central Project Files. The Proj ect Manager is responsible for designating an appropriate
individual to develop a filing system, including an outline for the file, document labeling system,
%ERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 8 of 14
file sign-out system, and filing procedures. The Project Manager is also responsible for
designating a person or persons (typically a project secretary or project assistant) to use the
project file system to establish and maintain the project file and to communicate the file system
requirements to all project team members. The central project files may be stored in a clearly
labeled area in an individual office accessible to all project team members, or in a dedicated file
room.
Electronic Files. Electronic copies of project data and calculations, programs, models,
databases, text, and figures are stored on identified project areas on ERG network servers that
are accessible to all project team members. The Project Manager is responsible for designating
an appropriate individual to develop a plan to organize the electronic files, including removal of
obsolete documentation.
5.3.2 Transmittal and Distribution
Distribution lists are established at the beginning of each project to ensure timely
dissemination of information to appropriate technical and administrative staff. At the end of the
project, copies of all reports and other records designated by the Project Manager are maintained
in ERG's project archives.
5.3.3 Control of Record Access (Confidential Business Information)
All documents released to ERG by clients under a confidentiality agreement are handled
in accordance with the terms of a client-approved security plan. For our EPA clients, EPA
Acquisition Regulation 1509.505-4 requires contractors to comply with the requirements of 40
CFR Part 2 and the provisions of their contracts relating to the treatment of CBI. Under 40 CFR
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 14
Part 2, Subpart B, ERG is required to protect CBI from unauthorized disclosure. This CBI may
have been collected by EPA under the authority of the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA),
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), or the Clean Air Act (CAA). Any CBI in
ERG's possession is handled in accordance with a set of written procedures designed and
prepared by ERG and approved by the cognizant EPA CBI Document Control Officer. ERG has
approved plans for handling CBI in the Morrisville, NC; Chantilly, VA; and Lexington, MA
offices. Among many other requirements, access to CBI documents is limited to authorized
users through a specified sign-out procedure.
Contractually established confidentiality requirements are communicated to project staff
in the project instructions. A corporate SOP is available for the handling of confidential business
material (Eastern Research Group Manual for the Handling of Confidential Business
Information). A project-specific CBI plan is developed as required by the client. ERG staff who
are required to handle CBI receive special training in the appropriate procedures, along with a
mandatory refresher course each year.
5.3.4 Retrieval and Preservation (Protection)
Storage and Retrieval. Active project files consist of paper records and electronic files
stored on ERG's computer network. Management of inactive files varies by ERG locations. At
Chantilly, paper records of inactive projects are warehoused in storage rooms. Inactive
electronic files (including spreadsheets and databases) are moved to tape or compact disk for
long-term storage. Archive procedures for computer files are discussed in Section 6.2.4.
At ERG's Morrisville, NC, laboratory, at the completion of a project, record material that
has been stored on the computer network is archived on compact disc (typically one disc per
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 10 of 14
contract). These compact discs, filed by contract number, are stored in ERG's laboratory. Paper
files for inactive projects are archived in clearly labeled cartons in limited access facilities at 900
Perimeter Park, Morrisville. The contents of each carton are listed on multi-carbon inventory
forms that identify:
Project identification information;
Originator's name;
Name of the person receiving the carton for storage;
Date of receipt;
Category of contents (e.g., project files, equipment); and
Description of the contents (e.g., test reports, work plan, reference reports).
This indexing system facilitates retrieval of any carton or document on request.
Preservation. Stored records are protected from damage, loss, and deterioration.
Records stored on site are located in locked climate-controlled file rooms, in a limited-access
building. The buildings are equipped with smoke alarms and sprinkler systems in case of fire.
Facilities are protected by perimeter alarms, automatic dry pipe sprinklers for fire protection, and
an interior alarm system monitored by a manned central station. Access to the facility storage
are is limited to authorized personnel.
In the event that fire or other disaster strikes leaving records damaged and unsecured,
ERG will transfer the records under close supervision to another secure location (the client's
location or off-site storage facility).
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 11 of 14
5.3.5 Retention and Disposition
Project files and laboratory data are maintained for a designated period of time. If there
are no additional contractual requirements, project files along with laboratory and field data are
maintained for 10 years. Project Managers are notified of impending disposition of information
and must approve the decision.
Documents obtained from clients or other entities or created by ERG that fall under
statutory (CWA, CAA, TSCA, or RCRA) CBI requirements are destroyed or returned to the
appropriate person(s) in accordance to the entities' written instructions. Other classified or
confidential records are destroyed by shredding or incineration.
5.4 EVIDENTIARY RECORDS (CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY AND CONFIDENTIALITY)
ERG's procedures for chain-of-custody and confidentiality procedures for evidentiary
records are described in this section.
5.4.1 Chain-of-Custody Procedures
Chain-of-custody procedures provide legally defensible documentation of sample
custody from collection through disposition. Chain-of-custody procedures apply to field
monitoring, sample collection, and analyses of environmental media and are tailored for specific
project needs specified in the QAPPs. These procedures include standard requirements for
sample labeling, chain-of-custody forms, field data sheets, field and laboratory notebooks,
sample control procedures, and sample handling and shipment procedures.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 12 of 14
QA steps taken to implement chain-of-custody procedures include presenting all
documentation requirements in the QAPP, training field personnel in all procedures prior to
beginning field work, and having project management and staff regularly review field and
laboratory notebooks and sample custody documentation during field activities. Technical
systems audits may also be conducted for field activities, and these audits provide an additional
level of QA checks for chain-of-custody procedures.
Chain-of-custody procedures are initiated at the time of sample collection. Information
about sample location, identification, field conditions, field meter measurements (e.g., pH,
conductivity), and other pertinent information is recorded in black ink on preformatted field data
sheets and/or field notebooks. Notebooks and data sheets are initialed by the personnel
recording the information.
Changes in recorded entries are made by crossing out the information with a single line
so the original information is not obscured, dating the change, and initialing it.
Preprinted labels are placed on sample containers at the time of collection and must be
completed in waterproof ink. Sample labels must contain legible information about the sample,
such as date and time of collection, initials of the person collecting the sample, and preservatives
used (if any). Sample control numbers, consisting of simple sequential numbers or alphanumeric
codes, are commonly used to identify samples. For air sampling, an alphanumeric sequence that
identifies the sampling train, component of the sampling train, sampling run, date, and initials of
the person recovering the sampling train may be used. Use of alphanumeric codes allows
submission of blind samples such as field blanks or audit samples for QC purposes. Use of
sample identification numbers minimizes the potential for transcription errors between the field
and the laboratory.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 13 of 14
ERG's Morrisville, NC, laboratory maintains logs of samples received for preparation or
analysis. The master log, kept in a secure location and completed daily, contains the sample
control number or identification, sample location, date, analytical methods required, sample
volume/containers, field personnel, and sample tracking information. Entering samples into the
master log is the responsibility of the Project Manager, Field Task Leader, or his/her designee.
All sample documentation, including data sheets, notebooks, and the master log, are subject to
review by the Project QA Coordinator.
Chain-of-custody forms are completed and an original copy is kept with the samples at
all times. Each time possession of the samples changes, the chain-of-custody form is initialed
and dated to indicate release and acceptance of the sample. The completed forms provide
sufficient information to document sample possession through all stages of the sampling and
analysis process. Standard forms are used to indicate the sample identification, analyses
required, project name, responsible individual(s), and comments relating to special handling
precautions required or special requests.
Sample handling and shipping procedures are established for each individual project. If
samples are shipped rather than hand-delivered to the laboratory, Department of Transportation
procedures for labeling and packaging are followed. An airbill number or other shipment
identification number is recorded on the chain-of-custody form, and the laboratory is notified of
the date and time of shipment. Sample security during transport is maintained by ensuring
containers (e.g., boxes, coolers) are still sealed upon arrival at the laboratory.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 5
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 14 of 14
5.4.2 Confidentiality Procedures for Evidentiary Records
ERG develops procedures for ensuring the confidentiality of evidentiary records at the
direction of our clients. For example, at the direction of our client's attorneys, correspondence
with these attorneys may be marked:
Attorney Work Product;
Privileged and Confidential; and
A ttorney-Client Communication.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: Iof20
SECTION 6
COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE
Computer hardware and software are necessary to support environmental programs.
ERG uses computers to manage operations, communicate with clients, research technical
information, generate scientific and technical reports, organize and analyze environmental data,
and store information for easy retrieval. Computers allow our staff to perform data calculations
and analyses efficiently and accurately, and allow us to present the results in an easy-to-
understand format using figures, tables, color, and graphics. Computer systems used to generate
or analyze data must be thoroughly evaluated to ensure that they perform the required function
and that the results are accurate. ERG's computer hardware and software use is consistent with
the requirements outlined in EPA Directive 2100 (EPA 1998). Work done by ERG on the EPA
contracts adheres to all EPA Information Technology Requirements, as necessary. This section
of the QMP describes ERG's QC procedures for computer hardware and software.
6.1 ENSURING QUALITY SOFTWARE
ERG ensures the quality of our computer software meets our client's requirements by
implementing processes for software development, installation, testing, use, maintenance,
control, and documentation. ERG's processes for addressing each of these processes are
described in detail below.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 20
6.1.1 Software Development
Software development is an integral component of ERG's expertise. Software
development is the process by which user needs are translated into software requirements,
software requirements are translated into design, the design is implemented into code, and the
code is certified for operational use. When a project requires new software, the ERG Project
Manager or an ERG Task Leader prepares a Software Development Plan. This document
integrates management activities, software development tasks, and QA procedures to guide and
coordinate the actions of the software development team. The Software Development Plan
details the software-specific management organization, resources, schedules, and procedures that
will be used during preparation of the software and describes the work effort by task, including
program milestones and periodic quality checkpoints. ERG updates the Software Development
Plan as necessary to reflect any technical or management changes.
The Software Development Plan specifies:
Functional requirements which are specific functions or operations that a system
or system component must be capable of performing;
Performance parameters which are requirements specifying system component
performance characteristics such as speed, accuracy, frequency, etc;
System interfaces which are hardware, software, or database elements with which
a system or a system component must interface, or that establishes constraints on
formats, timing, or other factors caused by such an interface; and
Reliability goals which are the ability of a software system to perform its
expected functions for a stated period of time and set of conditions without
failure.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 20
ERG's Software Development Plan also identifies acceptance criteria which the
completed software system must satisfy before it is certified for operation and specifies the basis
for these requirements. ERG consults both ANSI/IEEE Standard 730.1-1995 and ERG's
Software Development SOPs when preparing the Software Development Plan.
6.1.2 Software Installation
ERG establishes software installation instructions for each piece of software that we
develop. The software installation instructions are reviewed by the Project Manager or ERG
Task Leader. ERG distributes copies of the instructions with the software usually in the form of
a ReadMe.txt file or posted on a project website on the Internet.
6.1.3 Software Testing
After the initial version of a software tool is developed, ERG initiates a verification and
validation testing phase. Verification testing is defined as "finding errors through the execution
of a program in a test or simulated environment" (Glenford Myers, The Art of Software Testing,
1979) or "the process of evaluating software to determine whether or not an object in a given
phase of the software development process satisfies the requirements of the previous phases"
(IEEE Standard 1012-1998). The test environment that ERG chooses is based on the specific
functionality of the application. The Software Development Plan identifies the project criteria
for operation of the software before verification testing is performed. ERG thoroughly
documents the results of all verification tests.
Validation testing is defined as "finding errors by executing a program in a real
environment" (Myers, 1979) or "the process of evaluating software at the end of the software
development process to ensure compliance with requirements" (IEEE Standard 1012-1988).
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 20
Validation testing may take the form of client-directed acceptance tests, or it may be identified as
deliverable acceptance criteria in the Software Development Plan. Validation testing establishes
that the final product meets all the system requirements detailed in the Software Development
Plan.
6.1.4 Software Use, Maintenance, and Control
ERG maintains a master copy of all software that ERG develops. Depending upon
project requirements, many versions of software may be created through ERG's iterative
development cycle. ERG maintains version control during the software development life cycle
by organizing development files on the file server with directory structures that correspond to
version number or release data.
If the software developed includes a web application, ERG will often times host and
maintain the web application on ERG servers. ERG's hardware configuration is presented in
Section 6.2.2.
6.1.5 Software Documentation
Documentation is the foundation of successful software development and provides
guidance for software support. ERG maintains two levels of documentation for software
development projects, 1) programmer's notes and software life cycle documents, and 2) user's
manuals. The Project Manager or ERG Task Leader ensures that documentation is accurate and
up-to-date.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 20
Software Development Documentation. ERG's programmers' notes and software
development life cycle documents provide accurate records of the development process. This
documentation is consistent with the requirements outlined in EPA Directive 2100 (EPA 1998).
Software development life cycle documents include:
• Software Requirements Specification which establishes a detailed functional
description, a representation of system behavior, an indication of performance
requirements and design constraints, appropriate validation criteria, and other
information pertinent to requirements.
• Design Specification which outlines the design model, data design, architectural
design, and the design of required internal and external program interfaces. The
Design Specification contains a requirements cross reference. The purpose of this
cross reference is to establish that all requirements are satisfied by the software
design and to indicate which components are critical to the implementation of
specific requirements.
• Test Specification which includes the overall plan for testing the software.
• User'sManuals. Depending upon the software development project, ERG may
also develop user's manuals to assist in use of the software. ERG generates
User's Manuals in a variety of forms, including hard copy manuals, electronic
help files integrated with the software, or on-line help.
6.1.6 Commercial Software
ERG maintains a standard set of commercial software that is accessible to each
workstation. As specified by particular project requirements, ERG may install additional
software. Software installation is coordinated with the local area network (LAN) administrator.
As additional software requirements arise, ERG evaluates the needs on a case-by-case
basis. Our evaluation considers the impact of any implemented changes, performance issues,
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 6 of 20
and costs prior to purchase. All commercial software used on the EPA projects are compatible
with the EPA computer system designated in the work assignment.
6.2 ENSURING QUALITY HARDWARE
ERG ensures that the quality of computer hardware meets ERG's requirements by
implementing processes that ensure a stable computer network, an optimized hardware
configuration, and properly maintained hardware. Each of these processes is described in detail
below.
6.2.1 ERG's Computer Network
ERG uses a network of personal computers functioning with the Windows Operating
System. The computers in each of ERG's offices are joined in Local Area Networks (LANs)
consisting of file servers, user computers, printers, specialty servers, and cables that connect
them together. The offices and satellite locations are joined by telephone link in a Wide Area
Network (WAN). At each ERG location, all areas that house computers are secure and
temperature-controlled, and heating and air conditioning units maintain an acceptable humidity
range. Power to computer units is conditioned to prevent spiking and surging in the power
supply. ERG ensures that the automated data collection system has sufficient facility and
storage to retain raw data, including archives of computer-resident data.
ERG's Management Information Systems (MIS) department oversees the network
communications system hardware and software and personal computers for all of our offices and
satellite locations. ERG's MIS department consists of the director, Wendy Rodriguez, a senior
systems/network engineer, Joe Savastano (located in our Lexington office), and LAN
administrators, one of whom is located in each office. The MIS department meets weekly via
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 20
conference calls, and the director receives weekly activity reports from each office's LAN
administrator.
6.2.2 Hardware Configuration
ERG's hardware configuration is shown in Figure 6-1.
System security and virus protection are an ever-increasing concern in the business world
today. As illustrated in Figure 6-1, ERG ensures information protection by operating up-to-date
security systems and virus protection programs. ERG's WAN is secured by a firewall,
eliminating unauthorized access and maintaining system security. ERG's MIS director, Wendy
Rodriguez, and ERG's Vice President of Internet Technologies, Hui Zhou, subscribe to several
list servers to be notified of security patches for all operating systems. At a minimum of once a
month, a member of the ERG computer staff accesses the web site of every application provider
that ERG uses to ensure that all patches and updates are applied. For many web development
projects, ERG has implemented 128-bit encryption via secure socket layer (SSL) and has created
password-protected sites that only ERG employees and clients with proper authorization can
access.
To protect data and systems from virus infection, ERG's systems are fully automated to
launch virus protection software and receive daily or more frequent virus protection updates.
ERG's MIS staff subscribe to e-mail list groups to receive notification of virus updates. When a
new virus surfaces, the MIS director immediately notifies all MIS staff, who load the latest virus
pattern updates to the servers. The updated virus patterns are copied to staff personal computers,
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
o
B.
era
c
•s
re
o\
o
a
»9
•S
a
s
a
C/5
o
re
HH
I
OB
C
n
e
n
. ill i
ERG IVc* .Hoslviff Sc/vrcaa / PrDduciTcxn Sarwv
UK Ln!:i :r
jfll
ft M 0 2
2,
o o H
u> '-j ON
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 20
automatically, when employees log in to the LAN. If a virus alert occurs during the course of
the work day, all ERG staff are alerted via company-wide e-mail to log out of their computers
and log back in to activate the virus pattern update.
ERG's MIS director is responsible for evaluating the purchase of new hardware. Due to
rapid advances in technology, ERG purchases only top-of-the-line technology. ERG evaluates
the need for newer technology, performance issues, and conducts a cost/benefit analysis prior to
purchasing new hardware.
When new hardware is purchased, ERG implements a "trickledown system" that
facilitates the introduction of new technology and the removal of obsolete technology. For
example, when ERG receives a new workstation, the current workstation of the user receiving
the new workstation is trickled (handed) down to another user who has an older workstation.
This process allows for the oldest machines to be removed from inventory on a regular basis.
6.2.3 Hardware Testing
ERG's MIS department checks ERG's systems, network communications, and servers
each morning before the normal business day begins to ensure proper operation and that no
downtime is experienced by ERG's technical staff. The MIS department also checks ERG's
backup systems daily to ensure that the previous evening's file systems backup was executed
successfully.
When new hardware is introduced, ERG's MIS staff are responsible for ensuring a
smooth transition to the new hardware. This transition includes testing in a simulated work
environment during non-business hours to minimize interruptions of business operations.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 10 of 20
Contingency plans are established, which include making a full backup tape of data potentially
affected by the change in hardware.
6.2.4 Hardware Use, Maintenance, and Control
ERG LAN Administrators perform hardware maintenance and control. Our LAN
Administrators perform the following to ensure the stability of ERG's hardware:
Tape backup. The information on all file servers in the company is copied to
magnetic tape to provide a backup for the server. Full backups are scheduled for
Friday nights, and every file on the server is copied to tape. Once a month, a
copy of the full backup is removed to a fire-proof safe for storage. The backup
tape is stored for one year, then reused (e.g., the June 2002 backup is made over
the June 2001 tape). Incremental backups are scheduled for weekday nights, and
copy only files that have changed since the last backup to tape. These types of
backups save wear and tear on the backup tape drives by reducing the amount of
information that must be copied. Once a week, the MIS department moves a full
set of the week's backup tapes off site to ensure their safety.
Tape archive. When files are no longer needed on the server, they are moved to
tape for indefinite long-term storage. The space made available on the server by
archiving can be used for currently active projects. ERG's archive procedures
involve two identical backups of the files requested for archiving. The first
backup is to an on-site tape. The second backup is to an off-site tape. After both
backups are complete, ERG generates detail reports on both runs and compare the
number of files backed up and their sizes. Once ERG verifies the backups, ERG
removes the files from the server. The tapes are retained indefinitely.
Y2K compliance and other issues. The LAN administrators are also responsible
for personal computer, file server, e-mail, user, and technical support for each of
their local offices. All of ERG's systems and software applications have been
tested and validated for Y2K compliance.
6.2.5 Hardware Documentation
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 11 of 20
ERG maintains records of ERG's hardware inventory on the file server. These inventory
files are backed up according to the procedures outlined above. ERG's LAN administrators are
responsible for maintaining and updating inventory records with the introduction of new
hardware and the removal of obsolete hardware. All technical manuals for ERG hardware are
maintained in the network server rooms.
6.2.6 Laboratory Automated Data Collection Systems
State-of-the-art computer software, especially in the areas of chromatography and
spectroscopy, is available only from third parties. Generally, these vendors are unwilling to
share the software source code or to comply with the regulatory requirements imposed by Good
Laboratory Practice (GLP) Standards. Therefore, most hardware and software validation of
third-party computer systems depends on evaluation of performance parameters.
Testing
Automated data collection systems are regularly tested, inspected, and maintained by
ERG's MIS department with technical support from project staff. Written SOPs are available for
routine maintenance operations, and the procedures identify the individual responsible for the
performance of each operation. Written records are kept of all maintenance and include the date
of the operation and a description of whether the operation was routine and followed the written
procedure. Records of nonroutine maintenance are also kept in the system maintenance log,
including whether this maintenance was the result of failure and/or malfunction. The
maintenance log documents the problem, how and when the problem occurred, the remedial
action taken, and acceptance criteria to ensure normal functioning of the repaired system. Each
laboratory with an automated data collection system is responsible for backup and recovery
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 12 of 20
procedures to guarantee that the software for the system can be recovered after a system failure.
When an automated data collection system contains data that must be secured, physical and
functional access to the system is limited to authorized personnel only, and the introduction of
unauthorized external data and software is prohibited.
Each set of data manipulated via computer contains QC samples that indicate whether the
analytical method is working properly. Routine acceptable recoveries on QC samples also
indicate that the computer system is acquiring data and performing calculations correctly. For
chromatography, for instance, a set of standards prepared at a minimum of five levels is injected
with each set of samples. Review of the results for the standard curve (y-intercept, slope, and
correlation coefficient) indicate that the instrument is calibrated and the analytical method is
working properly. Area counts for the standards are monitored to determine that they are within
QC limits. These indicators give the project staff a guide for performing a miniature validation
on each set of data generated and analyzed.
All data generated from computer runs are evaluated by laboratory personnel and are
reviewed in detail by the senior technical reviewer for any unusual occurrences that could
indicate a potential problem. When the raw data are verified, the technical reviewer checks
random sections of the data manually to confirm that the computer system was operating
properly on that day. If data are transferred from raw form to a spreadsheet for calculations, the
senior technical reviewer will verify that the data transfer was performed correctly.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 13 of 20
Technical Management
Project Managers:
Designate an individual with primary responsibility for the automated data
collection system(s) used on their project;
Ensure that there is a QA/QC program in place to oversee the automated data
collection system(s);
Ensure that the personnel, resources, facilities, computer, and other equipment,
materials, and methodologies are available, as scheduled;
Receive reports of QA inspections or audits of computers and/or computer-
resident data and promptly take corrective actions in response to any deficiencies;
Ensure that personnel clearly understand the functions they are to perform using
automated data collection system(s); and
Ensure that deviations from these guidelines for automated data collection
system(s) are documented and reported to the designated responsible person and
that corrective actions are taken and documented.
Responsible Person
ERG's MIS staff in cooperation with the local Project Managers and the local Quality
Assurance Coordinator ensures that:
There are sufficient personnel with adequate training and experience to supervise
and/or conduct, design, and operate the automated data collection system, and that
they maintain their skills and competence;
There are procedures to guarantee that data are accurately recorded in the
automated data collection system;
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 14 of 20
• A data security risk assessment has been made, points of vulnerability
determined, and all necessary security measures implemented;
• The automated data system has written SOPs and appropriate software
documentation that is complete, current, and available to staff;
• All significant changes to operating procedures and/or software are approved and
signed by management;
• There are adequate acceptance procedures for software and software changes;
• Problems with automated collection systems that could affect data quality are
documented when they occur and are subject to properly documented action; and
• All applicable Good Automated Laboratory Practices are followed.
Standard Operating Procedures
The local QA Coordinator for ERG's laboratory ensures that SOPs are written for:
• The security of the system, including physical security, securing access to the
system and its functions, and restricting installation of external programs and
software;
• Verification of manually or electronically entered data;
• Data analysis, processing, storage, and retrieval;
• Proper methods for executing data changes to include the original data element,
the changed data, the date of the change, the individual responsible for the
change, and the reason for the change;
• Backup and recovery of data; and
• Electronic reporting, when applicable.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 15 of 20
ERG maintains the SOPs and other manuals that document automated data collection
procedures as part of its SOP program for each office location. Published literature or vendor
documentation used as a supplement to SOPs is referenced within the SOP. ERG also maintains
historical file of SOPs, which includes documentation of all revisions and their dates. Through
the historical record, it is possible to ascertain the software version used for the collection,
analysis, processing, or maintenance of all data sets on automated data collection systems.
6.3 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
ERG ensures the quality of the information we produce, maintain, and disseminate by
adhering to specific QA/QC procedures. These procedures are consistent with the requirements
outlined mEPA Directive 2100 (EPA 1998).
On work assignments issued by EPA or one of its prime contractors, ERG develops and
maintains information management systems that are compatible with existing or developing
databases from the EPA Office issuing the work assignment. Data sets and analysis software
and documentation are accessible to the EPA WAM and will be provided to EPA when the
contract expires.
Prior to developing environmental information databases, ERG uses existing databases,
information systems, models, and websites to the maximum extent possible. If existing products
are found to be usable for fulfilling requirements for deliverables, ERG notifies the EPA WAM
to facilitate coordinating use of such products.
ERG adheres to clause EPAAR 1552.211-79 "Compliance with EPA Policies for
Information Resources Management (IRM)," when performing IRM-related. Table 6-1 lists
EPA websites where the guidance documents articulating EPA policies may be found.
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 16 of 20
6.3.1 Data Entry
ERG ensures the integrity of the computer-resident data collected, analyzed, processed,
or maintained on the system by:
Identifying the individual responsible for direct data input at the time of its
collection;
Requiring that any change in automated data entries be made in a manner that
does not obscure the original entry and that includes the reason for the change, the
date, and the identity of the individual making the change; and
Using SOPs to verify the accuracy of manually entered data and electronically
transferred data collected.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 17 of 20
Table 6-1
EPA Information Technology Requirements
Website
http: //www. epa.gov/
irmpoh'8
http: //www. epa.gov/
edr
http://
basin.rtpnc.epa.gov/
ntsd/ITARoadMap.nsf
http: //www. epa.gov/
eims
http: //www. epa.gov/
storet
Name
IRM Policies,
Standards, Guidance
and Planning
Documents
Data Standards and
Environmental Data
Registry
Information
Technology
Architecture Road
Map (ITARM)
Environmental
Information
Management System
(EIMS)
Monitoring
information in
STORET
Comments
The 2100 Series (2100-2199) of the Agency's Directive System contains
the majority of the Agency's IRM policies, standards, and procedures.
ERG adheres to Trading Partner Agreement (TPA) Data Exchange
Templates (DETs) and data standards detailed in EPA Environmental Data
Registry (EDR). This includes any development/enhancement of
information resources (information resources for this process include
systems, databases, and models/web applications that utilize information
in OW systems and databases) as well as any data products flowing to or
from EPA information resources.
ERG adheres to all technical specifications listed in the ITARM for
development/enhancement of information resources.
When developing or enhancing an information resource ERG first
conducts a thorough search of existing information resources, through
means such as EIMS, to ensure development or enhancement of
information resources does not duplicate existing information resources.
If duplication is determined, ERG consults with the client to ensure that
existing information resources are optimally utilized in conjunction with
information resource being developed or enhanced. For any development
or enhancement of information resources, ERG works with EPA on
inserting and updating resource description information in EIMS.
Any water quality, biological, sediment, and ecological monitoring data
collected as part of contract activities are entered into STORET or made
available to EPA in a STORET compatible format.
6.3.2 Assuring Database Quality
ERG assures the quality of the databases ERG develops and maintains by:
Review of database design by a team member knowledgeable in relational
databases as outlined in ERG's SOPs for Database Development;
Review of the design and output of queries by one other team member as outlined
in ERG's SOPs for Database Queries;
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 18 of 20
Review of programming code utilized in data manipulation or report generation
by one other team member;
Establishing QA/QC procedures for data entry before data entry begins by the
Project Manager, or ERG Task Leader;
Performing manual QA/QC of the results generated by programming code by a
knowledgeable team member;
Performing manual QA/QC of information presented on reports by a
knowledgeable team member;
Maintaining version control of interim databases by a responsible team member;
Documenting database structures and maintaining documentation in project files
by a responsible team member; and
Performing integrity checks on the database prior to release by the Project
Manager or Task Leader.
6.3.3 Assuring Spreadsheet Quality
ERG ensures the quality of the spreadsheets ERG develops and maintains by:
• Reviewing spreadsheet design by a knowledgeable team member;
• Reviewing the design and output of equations and formulas by one other team
member as outlined in ERG's SOPs for Spreadsheet Development;
• Establishing QA/QC procedures for data entry before data entry begins;
• Maintaining version control of interim spreadsheets by the ERG Task Leader;
• Maintaining documentation in project files by a responsible team member; and
• Performing integrity checks on spreadsheets prior to release by the Project
Manager, or ERG Task Leader.
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 19 of 20
6.3.4 Modeling
Computer software is routinely used to model physical processes. Common types of
modeling activities include characterization of pollutant release, environmental dispersion and
resulting health risks, simulation of physical processes (e.g., combustion kinetics, response of
structural materials to stress, etc.), and prediction of economic impacts associated with proposed
activities or regulations. Modeling activities involve determining the appropriateness of the
model to the application, converting physical information to model inputs, configuring the model
inputs to match the physical process, running the model, and relating the model results back to
the physical process.
The objective of a modeling activity is usually to assess the impact of a proposed change
in the configuration or operation of a physical process. The impact can affect the physical
process itself (e.g., modeling to determine the rupture strength of a tank) or the environment
surrounding the process. Typically, specific information requirements dictate the need for
modeling and define the activity objective. However, the ERG Task Leader and Project QA
Coordinator evaluate the modeling objectives to ensure that modeling is required to supply the
needed information; in some situations, the same or better information can be generated more
efficiently using physical scale models, calculations, or another approach.
Documentation within or accompanying each model should guide the user in setting up
and operating the model. The ERG Task Leader and Project QA Coordinator ensure that the
procedures include concise guidance for determining the appropriateness of the specific model to
supply the needed information, for evaluating and selecting the proper hardware to run the
model, and for establishing model parameters and inputs.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 6
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 20 of 20
When a model or other software program is used to calculate emissions, manual
verification (by hand) of each type of calculation is performed. If calculations are complex and
cannot be easily reconstructed, an alternative approach ERG uses is to duplicate the results using
another calculation method.
EPA modeling guidance such as Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans for
Modeling (QA/G-5M) Peer Review Draft [dated 04/30/02] is consulted when developing QA/QC
procedures for modeling activities.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 1 of 11
SECTION 7
PLANNING
This section documents how ERG uses systematic planning processes, including the Data
Quality Objectives Process, to ensure that data or information collected for each contract or
project are of the needed and expected quality for their intended use.
7.1 SYSTEMATIC PLANNING PROCESS: WORK ASSIGNMENT REVIEW
ERG uses a systematic process to plan projects involving environmental data operations.
The process of articulating the project goals, objectives, and questions and issues to be addressed
begins upon receipt of a work assignment. After reviewing the work assignment, the Project
Manager, identifies the staff members who will serve as the ERG Task Leader(s) and Project QA
Coordinator. The Project Manager and Task Leaders(s) comprise ERG's Project Management
Team, and they confer with the client, to review the work assignment requirements. Direct
communication between the client and ERG's Project Management Team ensures a clear
understanding by all participants of EPA's needs and expectations and of the results and
products that will be provided by ERG. This initial conference between ERG and the client
achieves the two objectives described below.
7.1.1 Identification of Key Information Users ('Customers') and the Organization(s) That
Will Supply the Information to the Users
During the initial discussion between the client and the ERG Project Management Team,
the key users of the project output are identified. ERG works with the client to ensure the these
"customers" are involved in planning the project. In addition to identifying the project's
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 11
"customers," ERG works with the client to understand what organization(s) are the "suppliers"
responsible for meeting these customers' needs.
7.1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
During the initial work assignment discussion, the ERG Project Management Team and
the client work to define the client's needs and expectations in terms of technical and quality
goals by discussing the questions and issues to be addressed by ERG during the execution of the
work assignment.
7.2 SYSTEMATIC PLANNING PROCESS: WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT
After the initial conference, the ERG Task Leader prepares a Work Plan to translate the
client's needs into specifications for producing the desired result.
7.2.1 Schedule, Milestones, and Budget
The ERG Task Leader develops a work breakdown structure, which identifies staff
members, assigns responsibilities, and defines scopes, schedules, budgets, and performance
measurement baselines or time-phased budgets. The work breakdown structure breaks the job
down into the smallest, practical manageable pieces. The ERG Task Leader uses the work
breakdown structure to prepare a work plan and cost estimate responding to the work
assignment. The Project Manager reviews and approves the work plan before it is delivered to
the client. The work plan includes:
The person responsible for the work effort (ensuring that the proper experience
level and technical discipline are represented);
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 11
• A description of the scope of work;
• The measurable milestones associated with the work effort;
• The scheduled start and completion dates; and
• A budget estimate (including labor hours, labor costs, and all necessary other
direct costs, including travel, photocopying, materials, subcontracts, and
shipping).
In accordance with the specifications designated in the applicable work assignment, the
Work Plan is accompanied by a project-specific supplement to this QMP. This narrative may be
a complete QA Project Plan following EPA requirement in QA/R-5 or it may be a subset of
QA/R-5 requirements specified by the client. The narrative specifies QA/QC parameters for the
proposed project and describes acceptance criteria for the results or measures of performance.
ERG's design of project quality assessment is described in Section 7.3.
7.2.2 Regulatory and Contractual Requirements
The Work Plan identifies regulatory and contract requirements, such as managing CBI in
accordance with ERG's approved plan, obtaining client approval of non-local travel, and use of a
QAPP for each work assignment that involves measurement activities or gathering or generation
of original data.
Requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act that affect collection of data are
identified. For Federal Government programs, the ERG Task Leader works with the client to
identify that all data collection activities requiring Information Collection Requests are approved
by the Office of Management and Budget.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 11
7.2.3 Definition of Data Needs and Use
The Work Plan presents the general outline of the program and identifies the type and
quantity of data needed and how the data will be used to support the project's objectives. For
projects that require field sampling and/or field monitoring, a combined site-specific Field Test
Plan and QAPP is prepared to provide a detailed description of the site(s) to be sampled,
sampling and analytical methods to be applied, the project management structure for field
sampling, and the schedule for sampling and analytical activities. As discussed in Section 7.4,
ERG prepares a QAPP for each work assignment that involves measurement activities or
gathering or generation of original data. The Project QA Coordinator ensures that a QAPP is
prepared as required by the work assignment.
7.2.4 How, When, and Where the Data Will Be Obtained
The Work Plan identifies how, when, and where data required for completion of the
project will be obtained. The data may be collected by ERG or obtained from a secondary
source. See Section 7.5 for a discussion of the procedures used for evaluating and qualifying
secondary data.
7.2.5 Data Analysis, Evaluation, and Assessment (Refer to 7.3)
Data quality assessment design is discussed in detail in Section 7.3. The QAPP describes
how acquired measurements data will be:
Analyzed in the field and/or in the laboratory;
Evaluated (QA review, verification and validation);
Assessed against the quality performance criteria; and
Assessed against their intended use.
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 11
The Work Plan or a project-specific QA/QC plan prepared in response to a work
assignment, describes how other acquired data (e.g., survey data) will be:
• Analyzed statistically;
• Evaluated (QA review, verification and validation);
• Assessed against the quality performance criteria; and
• Assessed against their intended use.
7.3 DESIGN OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT
For each work assignment, ERG develops a plan for assessing if the data or information
collected are of the needed and expected quality for their intended use. ERG's plan includes
procedures for documenting this assessment of data quality. These plans are prepared in
accordance with the specifications designated in the applicable work assignments. This quality
assessment plan is a QAPP (see 7.4) or a project-specific QA/QC plan.
All data quality assessments specify:
• The quality measurements used;
• The quality performance criteria for those quality measurements; and
• The QC and QA activities needed to assess the quality performance criteria.
Quality performance criteria are based on the ultimate use of the data to be collected and
QA/QC practices required to support that use. In the decision making process, these criteria
allow a user to limit decision errors to a fixed level for determining whether or not an Action
Level (regulatory or risk-based) has been exceeded.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 6 of 11
The Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) Process (described in Section 7.6) is used to
develop acceptance or performance criteria based on the ultimate use of the data to be collected.
The DQOs Process is also used to define the quality required for the decision in terms of
acceptance limits on the probabilities of committing a decision error. Each step of the Data
Quality Objectives Process defines criteria that will be used to establish the final data collection
design.
7.4 QAPP
ERG prepares a QAPP for each work assignment that involves field and laboratory
measurement activities or gathering or generation of original data. Standard laboratory analysis
methods are performed under our NELAC - approved Laboratory Quality Systems Manual.
ERG prepares QAPPs in accordance with requirements designated in the applicable work
assignment. ERG follows EPA Requirements for QA Project Plans (QA/R-5) for work that
generates enforcement or regulatory data. Quality Assurance narratives that include the
appropriate subset of EPA QA/R-5 requirements are prepared for research programs not directly
related to regulatory or enforcement actions. ERG does not begin work involving environmental
data generation or use until the client has approved the required quality documentation.
As described in Section 2.3.1, Project staff or the Project QA Coordinator prepare the
QAPP, and the Project QA Coordinator ensures that this QAPP meets the appropriate
requirements. The Local QA Coordinator reviews and approves QAPPs prepared by project
staff before they are submitted to the client. The ERG Task Leader ensures that the procedures
specified in the QAPP are implemented and that collected data comply with all acceptance
criteria specified in the QAPP.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 11
The QAPP addresses all quality issues associated with sample collection, analysis, data
validation, and reporting. Many procedures, such as sample collection and analysis, instrument
calibration, chain-of-custody procedures, and data validation procedures and calculations are
standardized. Project-specific QA objectives are developed, and any constraints or adaptations
to SOPs are incorporated and reviewed prior to conducting any field.
7.5 SECONDARY DATA
The term "secondary data" is defined as data that were collected for a different purpose
than that for which they are now being used. In addition to a different purpose than the original
data collection, the level of QA/QC provided at the time of data collection may be unknown.
Secondary data may be used to support decision-making or to guide research. Secondary data
sources include existing databases, such as EPA's PCS and TRI databases and databases from
other government agencies, such as Department of Energy and Department of Agriculture; and
self-sampling data submitted by industrial facilities. Evaluation of the quality of secondary data
reduces the likelihood of a decision error.
7.5.1 Assuring the Quality of Secondary Data from Existing Databases
ERG's procedures for ensuring the quality of secondary data from existing databases
include the following steps:
1. Identify the data and how they will be used (e.g., preliminary assessment of
pollutant loadings from an industrial category, development of BAT-based
limitations, demonstration of facility compliance with regulatory requirements).
Develop appropriate data acceptance criteria.
2. Develop a QAPP or project-specific supplement to the QMP, detailing planned
QC for acquiring, managing, and using the secondary data. This plan details:
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 8 of 11
a) How the data will be obtained.
b) File tracking procedures. If the work assignment includes receipt of data
submitted from multiple entities, a central tracking system for incoming
electronic and/or hardcopy data is developed.
c) The system used for storing and archiving the data.
d) The system used to check the quality of the incoming data. If data are
received in multiple, small data deliveries, the checks may be done using a
check list. For large existing databases, the checks will be made using
automated (query) procedures. The data are checked to identify:
Corrupted files;
- Data out of acceptable range; and
- Missing data (e.g., missing values, missing units, missing
identifying information).
e) Procedures used to develop surrogate data for missing or erroneous data.
f) Quality checks made after the transfer of data between database systems
(e.g., checks for number of records, file completeness).
3. Ensure that the QA/QC plan is implemented.
7.5.2 Assuring the Quality of Existing Measurements Data
ERG procedures for validating existing measurements data include the following steps:
1. Use experienced reviewers for validating the data submissions.
2. Verify that the documentation provided is sufficient to assess the quality,
usability, and comparability of the data to the protocol that would be used to
collect new data (e.g., an EPA Sampling and Analysis Plan).
3. Verify the data meet minimum quality acceptance criteria (e.g., for detection
limits, blank contamination, reproducibility, spike recovery).
4. Verify the data were collected under a well-defined, documented quality system
(e.g., Standard E-4 ([ANSI/ASQC, 1994)], or Standard 9000 [(ISO, 1987)].
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 11
5. Confirm that all pertinent information, such as protocols, test plans, and primary
results, are available and use them to verify that the data were collected under
appropriate and clearly defined conditions.
7.6 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES PROCESS
Environmental data must be of sufficient quality and quantity to establish criteria for
making defensible decisions. The Data Quality Objectives Process is a systematic planning tool,
based on scientific method, for establishing criteria for data quality and for developing data
collection strategies. The DQOs Process is a tool available to Project Managers for structuring
the data collection planning process and for developing an appropriate data collection design.
The DQOs Process is most appropriate for planning the collection of environmental
measurements data.
The Data Quality Objectives Process incorporates seven steps.
1) State the problem.
• Define the problem completely, clearly, and concisely.
• Identify the members of the planning team, including representatives from
all groups who are stakeholders in the project and specifically include
statistical expertise.
• Designate a decision-maker for the planning team, and assign specific
roles to planning team members.
• Identify resources and deadlines pertinent to the project.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 10 of 11
2) Develop a decision statement.
Define the issue(s) that the project will attempt to resolve.
Identify possible actions that may be taken to solve the problem, including
an alternative that requires no action.
Combine the alternative actions and the principal study question into a
decision statement to express a choice among alternative actions.
If multiple decision statements are required to address the problem, list
them in the sequence in which they must be resolved.
3) Identify inputs to the decision.
Decide what types of information are needed to resolve the decision
statement and define the sources for each type of information.
Decide what information is needed to enable choosing between alternative
actions.
Determine whether there are appropriate environmental measurement
methods to provide the necessary data.
4) Define the boundaries of the study.
• Identify any practical constraints that may interfere with the study.
• Determine where and when analytical samples should be taken.
5) Develop a decision rule.
• Combine the results of the previous Data Quality Objectives steps into an
"If...then..." decision rule that defines the conditions that enable decision-
makers to choose among alternative actions.
6) Specify tolerable limits on decision errors.
• Error in sampling design occurs when the sampling design is unable to
capture the complete extent of natural variability that characterizes the
true state of the environment. Measurement error relates to the
combination of random and systematic error that occurs during the various
steps of a measurement process, from sample collection through data
handling. The possibility of making a decision error can never be totally
eliminated, but there are numerous ways that the decision error can be
minimized (e.g., collecting a large number of samples to minimize
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 7
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 11 of 11
sampling design error, analyzing individual samples several times to
minimize measurement error, etc.). Because reducing the possibility of
making decision errors generally increases costs, it is critical to have an
accurate definition of the needs of the decision maker to determine
tolerable limits of error.
7) Optimize the design for obtaining data.
• Identify the most effective data collection design that will generate data
that satisfy the defined Data Quality Objectives. The goal is to find
cost-effective alternatives that balance number of samples and
measurement performance, given the feasible choices for sample
collection techniques and analytical methods.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 8
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: Iof4
SECTION 8
IMPLEMENTATION OF WORK PROCESSES
The types of scientific and technical activities conducted by ERG include collecting and
evaluating available information from existing databases and other sources; collecting
environmental information through surveys, site visits, and field sampling efforts; analyzing
environmental information by database development, data processing, and computer modeling;
and preparing written reports and other documents. This section of the QMP describes how
work processes are implemented within ERG to ensure that environmental data are of the needed
and expected quality for their intended use.
8.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT: ENSURING THAT WORK IS PERFORMED
ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS AND SOPS
Project management consists of technical and administrative activities that ensure work
assignment objectives are understood and communicated to project staff and that the expected
product is provided in a technically sound, cost-effective manner. Work plans, site-specific
Sampling and Analysis Plans, and QAPPs communicate this information to the client and to
ERG project staff. Communication within ERG also includes project and task instructions,
which contain logistical and technical information used to control and coordinate project
implementation. These instructions detail the project management, technical review, and QA/
QC processes used to implement the work assignment. These instructions include thorough
instructions for managing and executing the technical project activities. Large projects may
utilize project management software to assist in planning and scheduling. Project instructions
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 8
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 4
provide logistical and technical information required by project team members to conduct the
work. The primary components of project instructions are:
• Project summary and objectives;
• Scope of work;
• Budget and schedule information, including internal deadlines;
• Confidentiality requirements, if any;
• Safety concerns;
• Project staff and responsibilities;
• Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to be used;
• Deliverables;
• Deliverable review requirements and other QC procedures;
• Internal and external communication procedures; and
• Travel and procurement requirements.
For large projects that incorporate many tasks, task instructions may be developed as part
of the technical planning activities. These task instructions provide team members with the
technical approach and with schedule and data quality requirements. Task instructions also
assign specific responsibilities to each individual.
8.1.1 Responsibilities
The ERG Task Leader is responsible for preparing and implementing project and task
instructions. The Project Manager is responsible for ensuring that adequate project and task
instructions are prepared and used.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 8
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 4
8.2 DEVELOPMENT OF WORK PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES
ERG's processes for identifying operations that require written procedures is presented in
this section. Both standard operations and special (critical) operations are discussed.
8.2.1 Standard Operating Procedures
As described in Section 2.2.1, SOPs are written instructions that document a routine or
repeated activity. SOPs detail work processes in order to facilitate consistent conformance to
technical and quality system requirements. Use of SOPs helps to ensure data quality.
Identifying when new SOPs are needed. As discussed in Sections 1.2.2 and 2.2.1, the
Local QA Coordinators are responsible for identifying when SOPs are needed at their location
and for designating an appropriate individual to create the needed SOPs. The local QA
Coordinators are responsible for developing a standardized form for their location's SOPs.
Use of SOPs. In developing the work plan and project instructions, the ERG Task Leader
identifies the SOPs to be used in conducting the work. The Project Manager verifies that the
identified SOPs are appropriate to the activity being conducted. As discussed in Section 9.2.7,
the corporate quality management staff conducts occasional technical systems audit to evaluate
adherence to approved QAPPs and SOPs.
Review, approval, revision, and withdrawal of SOPs. The Local QA Coordinator is
responsible for reviewing the draft SOP or designating an appropriate technical reviewer;
circulating the approved SOP to technical staff members; and maintaining copies of SOPs
pertaining to the ERG location in a central filing system. SOPs are company-confidential. ERG
SOPs are prepared and filed by individual ERG locations and maintained in a central filing
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 8
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 4
system controlled by the Local QA Coordinator. Each SOP has a signed title page and document
control format, as depicted in Figure 5-1 found in Section 5 of this QMP. The Local QA
Coordinator is responsible for withdrawing obsolete procedures.
8.2.2 Procedures for Special or Critical Operations
Work procedures to be followed for a specific project are presented in a written format in
the work plan and project instructions. The ERG Task Leader is responsible for preparing and
implementing these plans. The Project Manager is responsible for reviewing the plans and for
ensuring compliance with them. For projects the Project Manager considers special or critical,
review procedures are developed in consultation with the Local QA Coordinator. See Section 9
of this QMP for available assessment tools.
8.3 CONTROL MEASURES
See Sections 5.2.2 Quality System Records (SOPs and QMP) and 5.2.3 Quality System
Document Control for a description of the process used for controlling and documenting the
release and changes of the QMP, SOPs, and QAPPs, including needed approvals and removal of
obsolete documentation from work areas.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 1 of 16
SECTION 9
ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE
This section of the QMP documents how ERG management determines the suitability
and effectiveness of the ERG quality system. This section also documents how ERG evaluates
the quality of the projects involved with environmental data collection, generation, or use.
Section 9.1 describes how and when ERG assesses the effectiveness of our corporate
quality system and project quality and describes the roles and responsibilities of management
and staff in conducting these assessments. Section 9.2 describes available quality assessment
tools. Section 9.3 describes QC measures used during the generation of environmental
measurements data.
9.1 CONDUCTING ERG QUALITY SYSTEM AND PROJECT QUALITY
ASSESSMENTS
Quality System Assessment. As described in Section 2.2.2 of this QMP, the ERG
Corporate QA Manager conducts an annual, internal review of the corporate quality system to
determine if the quality system is implemented and is operating as prescribed in the QMP. The
Corporate QA Manager is responsible for ensuring that independent audits are conducted to
determine the effectiveness of the ERG quality system. Local QA Coordinators are responsible
for reporting to the Corporate QA Manager results of independent audits they have performed to
determine the effectiveness of the ERG quality system, Management Systems Reviews, and
independent project quality technical assessments.
Project Quality Assessments. Each Local QA Coordinator is responsible for planning,
scheduling, and conducting independent assessments to determine the effectiveness of the ERG
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 16
QA/QC program. Local QA Coordinators report the results of these assessments to the
Corporate QA Manager and ERG management. Planning of project quality assessments,
selection of assessment personnel, reports to management, and responses to assessment findings
are discussed in the following sections.
9.1.1 Planning
Planning for project quality assessment is part of the development of a work plan and
QAPP (if applicable). The Local QA Coordinator works with the ERG Task Leader during the
development of the work plan to identify the QA/QC procedures that are commensurate with the
project objectives. The Local QA Coordinator and the ERG Task Leader identify the quality
assessment tools that will be used (See Section 9.2 for a description of assessment tools).
Quality assessments (e.g., technical reviews, peer reviews, and field sampling audits) are
included in the project schedule and budget.
9.1.2 Assessment Personnel
Qualifications of Assessment Personnel. Technical review is the most commonly used
tool for assessing ERG project quality. Technical reviewers are proficient in the work area of
interest, but are not directly responsible for performing the work. The Project Manager works
with the Local QA Coordinator to identify one or more qualified technical reviewers at the start
of the project. If special expertise is required, technical reviewers may be ERG consultants or
subcontractors.
The ERG staff tasked with assessing the quality of ERG projects have considerable
experience in designing and conducting audits of measurement systems (based on internal, but
functionally independent, audits of projects and laboratories); external audits of ERG projects
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 16
conducted by other organizations; and external audits conducted by ERG staff. This experience
contributes to effectiveness and efficiency in auditing performance.
Independence of Assessment Personnel. Personnel conducting assessments are
technically knowledgeable but have no direct involvement or responsibility for conducting the
work assessed. Thus, they have no conflict of interest (real or perceived).
Authority of Assessment Personnel. Assessment personnel are permitted to access
managers, documents, and records, as needed to evaluate the quality of the project. If necessary,
the assessment personnel are granted access to CBI, after complying with the provisions of the
relevant ERG CBI Plan. As discussed in Section 1.2.3, Stop Work Authority, if assessment
personnel find deficiencies in project team quality performance, they notify the Project Manager
and Corporate QA Manager. If the deficiencies are not resolved, the assessment personnel, in
conjunction with the Project Manager, have full authority to stop work and replace project staff
(if necessary) so that the deficiencies are resolved.
9.1.3 Management Review and Response to Assessment Findings
As discussed in Section 1.2.1, the Corporate QA Manager is responsible for
implementing corrective actions for quality problems identified by Local and Project QA
Coordinators. She is also responsible for recommending required management-level corrective
actions which may include stopping work of inadequate quality until identified deficiencies are
resolved.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 4 of 16
9.1.4 Corrective Actions
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 5 of 16
Audits, evaluations, and surveillance are the mechanisms used to identify and
communicate conditions adverse to quality, to determine a cause for them, and to initiate
corrective action. The Project Management Team and senior technical management are
responsible for ensuring that when deficiencies are identified, corrective actions are implemented
and verified without delay.
Communication. Assessment personnel are responsible for communicating, in writing,
any detected deficiencies to the Project Manager and Local QA Coordinator in a timely fashion.
The assessment personnel identify the need for corrective action and the Project Manager is
responsible for ensuring appropriate action has been taken and documented.
Confirmation of Implementation and Effectiveness. The Local QA Coordinator is
responsible for confirming that corrective action has been taken and that the action was effective
in remedying the deficiency detected by the assessment personnel.
9.1.5 Resolution of Disputes
On the rare occasion that there is a dispute between the Project Manager and the ERG
Corporate QA Manager over proper corrective action or solutions to deficiencies (see Section
1.2.3), the ERG President, David Meyers, resolves the dispute.
9.2 ASSESSMENT TOOLS
ERG executes regularly scheduled audits to verify compliance with all aspects of its
quality system and to determine its effectiveness. If inadequacies are identified in the laboratory
measurement system and/or in a project's products, audits provide the mechanism for
implementing corrective action.
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 6 of 16
Types of assessment tools applicable to various aspects of scientific and technical
activities are described in the following sections:
9.2.1 Management Systems Reviews;
9.2.2 Peer Reviews;
9.2.3 Technical Reviews;
9.2.4 Performance Evaluation Audits;
9.2.5 Data Quality Assessments and Data Quality Audits;
9.2.6 Readiness Reviews;
9.2.7 Technical Systems Audits; and
9.2.8 Surveillance.
9.2.1 Management Systems Reviews
A management systems review is a qualitative assessment of a data collection operation
and/or organization to establish whether the prevailing quality management structure, policies,
practices, and procedures are adequate to ensure that the type and quality of data needed are
obtained. A management systems review is a qualitative review of the role of QA/QC in project
management, where strengths, weaknesses, and problem areas are evaluated. This review is also
used to determine the extent to which QA/QC has been established within the organization.
Among the issues addressed in a management systems review are:
The role of QA/QC as described in management policy;
The documentation by the program management team of the implementation of
QA/QC procedures on the project; and
The ability to trace the resources allocated to QA/QC management.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 7 of 16
Management systems reviews are qualitative evaluations conducted on a regular basis at
the corporate level. These reviews do not answer questions involving specific aspects of the QA
procedures nor do they address the measurement systems and the data quality indicators.
9.2.2 Peer Reviews
Peer review is a documented critical review of work generally beyond the "state-of-the-
art," or work characterized by the existence of potential uncertainty. Peer review is conducted
by qualified individuals who are independent of those who performed the work, but who have
equivalent technical expertise (i.e., peers). Peer reviewers assess whether the work performed is
technically adequate, competently performed, properly documented, and satisfies the technical
and quality requirements specified in the Work Plan and/or QAPP. Peer review is an in-depth
assessment of the assumptions, calculations, extrapolations, alternate interpretations,
methodology, acceptance criteria, and conclusions of a specific work and its documentation.
Peer review is typically used in research and development or other activities where quantitative
methods of analysis or measures of success are unavailable or undefined.
9.2.3 Technical Reviews
Technical review is a documented critical review of work that has been performed within
the "state-of-the-art." Each ERG project has at least one technical reviewer, a person who is
proficient in the work area of interest, but not directly responsible for performing the work. One
or more technical reviewers are designated at the start of each project at ERG, and the
participation of a technical reviewer in the project is budgeted as a line-item cost. The
responsibilities of this reviewer include a detailed review of all significant project deliverables
and an up-front review of the detailed Work Plan to ensure that:
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 8 of 16
• The project goals are well-defined, realistic, and appropriate to the needs of the
client;
• The approach proposed to meet the goals is reasonable and likely to result in a
successful project; and
• The necessary resources in terms of time, dollars, and competent staff are
dedicated to the project.
Depending on the needs of the project, the technical reviewer may also function as a
senior technical advisor, serving as a resource to project staff during the course of the project.
Because of the reviewer's technical experience and proficiency in the work area, the reviewer
can make an extremely valuable technical contribution to the program.
A formal project review of all technical work may also be performed by ERG senior
technical management who are independent of those who performed the work. This review is
done to provide a critical analysis and evaluation of documents, activities, material, data, or
items that require technical verification or validation for applicability, correctness, adequacy,
completeness, and assurance that requirements established in the Work Plan or QAPP are
satisfied. Technical reviews of ERG projects are maintained as part of the project file.
9.2.4 Performance Evaluation Audits
The purpose of a performance evaluation audit is to quantitatively assess data quality. A
performance evaluation audit is applicable to any testing program where reproducibility
according to a standard is relevant, as in physical or chemical analysis laboratories, or in field
measurement programs such as ambient air monitoring or source emission characterization. The
performance evaluation audit provides a direct evaluation of the various measurement systems'
capabilities to generate quality data. The performance evaluation audit is accomplished by
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 9 of 16
challenging the measurement system with accepted reference standards, such as Standard
Reference Materials supplied by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) or
by commercial vendors.
Performance evaluation audits review the following:
Precision and bias of the measurement system;
Comparison of QC data to actual measurement data collected;
Function of the measurement system relative to established control limits; and
Significant deviations from the data quality objectives over time.
Although information collected during a performance evaluation audit will determine
when a system is not performing adequately, the nature of appropriate corrective action is not
always evident. Questions regarding qualitative issues, such as management policies, sample
custody procedures, recordkeeping, and data handling systems are not addressed in a
performance evaluation audit.
9.2.5 Data Quality Assessments and Data Quality Audits
Data Quality Assessments. A data quality assessment is a statistical and scientific
evaluation of a data set to determine:
The validity and performance of the data collection design;
The validity and performance of the statistical test(s); and
The adequacy of the data set for its intended use.
A data quality assessment can be undertaken only after data have been generated or
collected, and is typically performed by a senior project team member, another designated
technical reviewer, the Local QA Coordinator, or a combination of staff. A data quality
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 10 of 16
assessment determines whether the project data meet the Data Quality Objectives and whether
they are of the correct type, quality, and quantity to satisfy the objectives specified in the Work
Plan or QAPP.
Data Quality Audits. A data quality audit is designed to assess data quality indicators
and is applicable to programs in all areas where data are collected. A data quality audit provides
information to characterize the data, such as:
• Adequacy of data collection, recording, and transfer;
• Precision and bias of resultant data;
• Adequacy of data calculation, generation, and processing;
• Documentation of all data-handling procedures; and
• Identification of data quality indicators to inform users of limitations and
applicability.
A data quality audit will determine whether the data collection procedures need
modification and whether the use and documentation of QC procedures are adequate. A data
quality audit will not, however, address the overall QA management system of an organization,
nor will a data quality audit answer technical questions such as the operating conditions of
facilities and equipment.
9.2.6 Readiness Reviews
A readiness review is a systematic, documented review of the readiness for the start-up or
continued use of a facility, process, or activity. A readiness review is typically conducted by a
project peer reviewer, senior technical management, or Project QA Coordinator, and is
performed before proceeding beyond project milestones and prior to initiation of a major phase
of work. A readiness review addresses the following questions:
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 11 of 16
Has project work of sufficient quality and quantity been completed to allow the
project team to proceed with the next phase of work?
Is the project on schedule and within budget?
Are appropriate resources (i.e., supplies, materials, analytical instruments,
sampling equipment) available for successful execution of the next phase of
work?
Has the project team planned for appropriate support staff (i.e., technical editors,
secretarial, or clerical support) for the next phase of work?
If subcontractors or consultants are required in the next phase of the project, have
appropriate arrangements been made and is the necessary documentation
available and approved?
9.2.7 Technical Systems Audits
A technical systems audit is an on site, qualitative review of the various aspects of a total
sampling and/or analytical system. A technical systems audit provides an assessment of overall
effectiveness and represents a subjective evaluation of a set of interactive systems with respect to
strengths, deficiencies, and potential areas of concern. Typically, the audit consists of
observations and documentation of all aspects of the measurement effort.
A technical systems audit at ERG serves to evaluate adherence to approved QAPPs and
SOPs. A technical systems audit reviews the following:
• Sample collection and handling;
• Instrument operation, calibration procedures, and documentation of instrument
operation and maintenance;
• Completeness of data forms, notebooks, and other reporting requirements;
• Data review and validation procedures;
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 12 of 16
• Data storage, filing, and recordkeeping procedures;
• Sample custody procedures, including laboratory sample tracking;
• QC procedures and documentation;
• Operating conditions of facilities and equipment;
• Documentation of maintenance activities in individual instrument maintenance
logs; and
• Systems and operations overview.
Technical systems audits do not provide a quantitative measure of quality, but rather an
evaluation of the effectiveness of a QC program, both in terms of design and implementation.
9.2.8 Surveillance
Surveillance refers to the continual monitoring and verification of the status of a project
and the analysis of records to ensure that specified requirements are being fulfilled. Surveillance
is performed by the project's technical management team, who monitor the status of the project
and are responsible for the review of records such as laboratory notebooks and other documents.
Review of documents and data generated may be performed by the designated technical
reviewer, who has a major role in the function of surveillance on the designated program.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 13 of 16
9.3 QC MEASURES
ERG QC measures used in field sampling, chemical and physical measurement, and for
statistical control and quality calculations are described below.
9.3.1 Field Control Samples
The specific kind and number of control samples and the frequency of collection and
analysis are documented in the individual QAPP. Control samples used to document the
accuracy and precision of sampling are:
Calibration samples: All instrumentation used for sampling must be calibrated
before and after each sampling event. Measurement control for this equipment
includes physical inspection for appropriate size and shape, visual inspection for
structural integrity, and leak checks. Specific calibration techniques are discussed
in the QAPP.
Blanks: Field (equipment) blanks are collected at the start of the sampling
program. For water sampling programs, analyte-free water (HPLC-grade) is
passed through or over the sampling equipment, into the appropriate sampling
containers, and preserved on site according to the analyte-specific preservation
methods. The analytical results are used to assess the introduction of
contaminants into samples from the sampling equipment. On air sampling
programs, field blanks consist of sampling media that are prepared, brought to the
field, and installed in the sampling equipment with no stationary source matrix
passed through the sampling train. Field blanks are used to detect any
contamination from the sampling equipment or handling of the sampling medium,
cross-contamination from previously collected samples, or contamination from
conditions arising during sampling. Trip blanks are samples of sampling media
taken from the laboratory to the sampling site and returned unopened to the
laboratory. Trip blanks are used to detect any contamination or cross-
contamination that might occur during handling and transportation of samples.
Field duplicates: Duplicate samples are collected at the frequency specified in the
QAPP and are used to document sampling and analytical precision. This
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 14 of 16
precision is a function of the variability of the sampling matrix and the variability
in the performance of the sampling and analytical techniques.
Field spikes: Field spikes are used to determine the loss of compounds of interest
during sampling and shipment to the laboratory. For example, field spikes are
designed to show field technicians' precision, possible contamination, and
degradation during storage.
9.3.2 Chemical and Physical Measurement Control
Control samples are used as an internal evaluation of how the measurement system
performed. Control samples are intended to check contamination, precision, and accuracy within
previously established limits. The type of control samples used depends on the laboratory
procedure, but frequency, acceptance criteria, and corrective action must all be considered.
Requirements for control samples must be written and unambiguous corrective action procedures
specified whenever a control sample does not meet acceptance criteria. Control samples
typically include calibration checks, QC check samples such as second source reference
materials, blanks, spiked samples, and replicates. Project-specific control samples are specified
in the QAPP.
Laboratory control samples are blanks that have been spiked with the analytes of interest
from an independent source to enable monitoring of the execution of the analytical method.
These samples are used to verify that the analytical instrument is calibrated correctly. The two
types of blanks used in chemical and physical measurements include:
Laboratory blanks: A laboratory blank is an aliquot of an analyte-free matrix that
is taken through the preparation steps prior to analysis. The results from
laboratory blanks are used to identify any contamination from reagents, sample
preparation equipment, or analysis; and
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 15 of 16
System blanks: A system blank is an artificial sample designed only to monitor
instrument contamination. System blanks are reagent water or pure solvent that is
taken only through the analytical process.
Four types of laboratory spikes are routinely used in the analytical laboratory:
• Laboratory control samples are spikes of a reagent grade matrix that are taken
through the preparation and analysis steps. Laboratory control samples are used
to document accuracy and precision of the entire analytical process.
• Analytical spikes are spikes added to the samples after preparation but before
analysis; analytical spikes are used to document analytical accuracy.
• Matrix spikes are spikes added to a sample matrix prior to extraction, digestion, or
other preparative steps, and analysis. Matrix spikes are used to assess precision
and bias in actual samples, as well as to identify matrix effects.
• Surrogate spikes are organic compounds that are similar to the analytes of interest
in chemical composition, extraction behavior, and chromatographic behavior, but
that are not normally found in nature. The surrogate spike compounds may be
isotopically labeled analogs of the compounds of interest or homologs of the
compounds of interest. Surrogate compounds are spiked into all blanks,
standards, samples, and spiked samples prior to preparation and analysis.
Surrogate spikes are used to assess precision and bias.
Instrumentation used for measurement must be calibrated before and after each analytical
series. Measurement control for this equipment includes visual inspection for structural
integrity, leak checks for vacuum equipment, checks of chromatographic properties, etc.
Specific calibration procedures are specified in the QAPP.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 16 of 16
9.3.3 Statistical Control and Quality Calculations
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 17 of 16
Statistical methods are applied to establish and monitor control in analytical processes
and to calculate precision and accuracy for measurement data during data validation. The
statistical procedures and calculations to be used for a specific measurement process or project
are identified and presented in the QAPP or in appropriate SOPs. These statistical calculations
follow EPA or other recommended procedures.
Statistical control must be demonstrated for each analytical process before the
measurements can be considered reliable. Statistical control is usually determined by calculating
the mean and standard deviation of a series of measurements of the same control sample or
parameter, analyzed over a period of time. Warning and control limits are generally set at two or
three times the standard deviation of the measurement. Control charts are maintained to provide
visual demonstration of statistical control and are updated periodically to monitor the process.
Corrective action must be taken if the measurement exceeds the control limits. Parameters or
measurements that are monitored include method spike recoveries for organic and inorganic
analytes, surrogate spike recoveries, and the relative percent difference between matrix spike/
matrix spike-duplicate sample recoveries. The frequency requirements for updating control
charts and control limits, the parameters or measurements to be monitored, and corrective
actions are defined in the QAPP. Statistical control calculations and control charts are reviewed
as part of Technical Systems Audits and Data Quality Audits.
Data validation procedures are presented in every QAPP and follow standard statistical
calculations for precision and accuracy. Specific calculations used to assess precision include
the relative percent difference (RPD) and average RPD for duplicate samples or analyses, and
coefficient of variation (CV) and pooled CV for measurements of three or more replicates.
Confidence intervals may be established for specific parameters or analytes for use in data
interpretation applications. Accuracy is evaluated by calculating the percent recovery or
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 9
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 18 of 16
standard error for Performance Evaluation Audit samples, or the percent recovery of matrix,
method, or analytical spike samples.
Blank sample results may also be evaluated by statistical methods, such as calculating the
average blank contaminant concentration. These results are compared to field sample results to
assess whether blank contamination has influenced or biased the results.
Precision and accuracy results are compared to the established control limits or
project-specific Data Quality Objectives. This comparison provides the basis for assessing
whether the data are valid for use in the intended applications, whether any data must be flagged
to indicate limitations in their use, or whether any corrective action is warranted.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 10
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: Iof3
SECTION 10
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
This section of the QMP documents how ERG works to continuously improve our
corporate quality system and the systems we use to ensure the quality of our work.
10.1 MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT
ERG's goal is to meet or exceed our customers' expectations for quality products. ERG
is committed to allocating the necessary resources for implementing, maintaining, and improving
our quality management program, as well as preventing problems before they occur.
ERG senior management communicate these expectations to staff during employee
training, project planning, review of work plans, and staff performance reviews. Technical
capability, work quality, and adherence to QA/QC procedures are the most heavily weighted
factors in staff performance reviews.
ERG management and project staff consider the Project QA Coordinators as team
members whose goal is to help achieve the common goal of producing complete and accurate
data.
10.2 IDENTIFICATION AND REMEDIATION OF CONDITIONS ADVERSE TO
QUALITY
ERG uses audits, evaluations, and surveillance (described in Section 9 of this QMP) to
identify and communicate conditions adverse to quality, to determine a cause for them, and to
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 10
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 2 of 3
initiate corrective action. A QA/QC system functions to save time, improve procedures,
communicate the need for additional support and resources to management, and to improve the
overall effectiveness of systems and the quality of the data. Systematic deficiencies identified by
audits are reported to the Corporate QA Manager so that she can address these deficiencies in her
annual quality improvement plan.
Any project team members concerned about problems or events that affect data quality,
sample integrity, or laboratory or field safety, communicate their concerns to the Project
Manager or his designee. The team members identify the problem and make recommendations
for solutions. As directed by the Project Manager, the team members implement the
recommended solution and document the result. Timely identification is vital to solving
problems and thorough documentation is vital to preventing their recurrence.
An example of ERG's quality problem identification procedures is the Request for
Corrective Action system used to track quality deficiency issues in the Morrisville chemistry
laboratory. Problems signaling significant and systematic deficiencies are addressed with a
Request for Corrective Action. A Request for Corrective Action is issued by a member of the
QA staff or by his/her designee for a particular project to the associated manager. Each Request
addresses a specific problem or deficiency, usually as a result of an external or internal QA audit.
These requests are designed to identify a specific problem, to recommend a course of action, to
identify the person responsible for implementing the corrective action, to verify implementation,
and to document the resulting corrective action taken. Each Request for Corrective Action
requires a written response from the responsible party, typically the person to whom the Request
was issued.
As discussed in Section 2.2.3, ERG also asks our clients directly if they are satisfied with
the quality of our work. Each client, Contract Officer, and WAM is contacted by ERG President
iERG
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Section No.: 10
Revision No.: 1
Date: April 2004
Page No.: 3 of 3
David Meyers or another ERG senior manager every year and asked to provide an assessment of
the technical quality of our work. Clients are also asked if there are areas they would like ERG
to improve. Any identified systematic deficiencies are addressed in a quality improvement plan.
10.3 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES
All ERG employees are encouraged to identify opportunities to improve the quality of
our work. They are encouraged to :
• Identify problems;
• Investigate the root cause;
• Develop solutions to the problems; and
• Communicate their concerns to management, including ERG President David
Meyers.
10.4 ENCOURAGING STAFF PARTICIPATION
ERG management encourages staff participation in quality improvement by taking a "no-
fault attitude." Through our quarterly achievement award program, management recognizes
individual and group contributions to ERG's success, including contributions to quality
improvement.
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
APPENDIX A
ERG STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES
-------
Appendix A
Revision No.: 6
Date: January 2003
Page No.: Iof4
APPENDIX A
ERG STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES
SOP
No. SOP Title
1 Documentation of Field Recovery Activities
Gravimetric Determination for Particulate Emissions Measurements
Field Procedure for Collecting Ambient Air Toxics and Carbonyl Compounds Samples
using the ERG: AT/C Sampling System
SOP for Preventive Maintenance in the Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Laboratory
SOP for the Concurrent GC/FID/MSD Analysis of Canister Air Toxic Samples
SOP for the Analysis of Tenax® Tubes According to EPA Method TO-I/TO-17
SOP for the Preparation of Review Packages for Mass Spectrometry Data Sets
Procedure for Preparation of Standard Operating Procedures
SOP for the Operation of the Documentation System
10 SOP for the Determination of Method Detection Limits in the GC/MS Air Toxics
Laboratory
11 SOP for Sample Storage and Checkout from Freezers/Refrigerators at the Laboratory
12 SOP for Basic Training Requirements for Sample Preparation Laboratory Personnel
13 Field Procedure for Collecting Ambient Air Hexavalent Chromium Samples using the
ERG:CR6 Sampling System
14 SOP for Sample Preparation QC
15 SOP for Documentation Procedures for the Sample Preparation Laboratory
16 SOP for the Varian 9000 Series High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
17 SOP for Developing, Documenting, and Evaluating the Accuracy of Spreadsheet Data
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Appendix A
Revision No.: 6
Date: January 2003
Page No.: 2 of 4
SOP
No. SOP Title
18 Maintaining and Recording Data Records
19 SOP for Transferring, Storing, and Using Confidential Business Information (CBI)
20 SOP for Conducting a Laboratory Systems Audit
21 Calibration and Operation of Analytical Balances
22 SOP for the Preparation of Standards in the ERG Organic Preparatory Laboratory
23 SOP for the Use of Significant Figures and Rounding Off Numbers When Reporting
Data
24 SOP for Preparing Aldehyde Derivatizing Reagents and Extracting Derivatized
Samples
25 SOP for the Operation of the Rainin High Performance Liquid Chromatography
System
26 SOP for Documentation: Labeling of Samples and Standards Prepared in the
Laboratory
27 SOP for the Operation of a Gas Chromatograph
28 SOP for QA/QC in the Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
29 SOP for Concentration of Sample Extracts Using the Kuderna-Danish Concentrates
30 SOP for Canister Sampling System Certification Procedures
31 SOP for Cleaning Glassware and Syringes for Organic Analysis
32 Statistical Manual Standard Operating Procedure
33 SOP for Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal
34 Analytical Chemistry Training at PPK Laboratory
35 SOP for QA/QC
36 SOP for Laboratory Security
37 SOP for Chemical Inventory
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Appendix A
Revision No.: 6
Date: January 2003
Page No.: 3 of 4
SOP
No.
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
55
56
57
58
SOP Title
SOP
SOP
SOP
for Personal Protective Equipment Program
for Maintaining Laboratory Notebooks
for Chemical Storage Facilities
SOP for Tracer Gas Release and Integrated Bag Sampling for Analysis by FTIR
Spectroscopy
SOP
for the Dionex-300 Ion Chromatograph
SOP for the Analysis of Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Gaseous Emissions using
the SemiVOST Method
SOP
SOP
for Method 8270C - GC/MS Analysis of Semivolatile Organics
for Sample Log-in at the ERG Chemistry Laboratory
Field Procedure for Collecting Speciated and/or Total Nonmethane Organic
Compounds Ambient Air Samples using the ERG:S/NMOC Sampling System
Field
ERG
SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP
SOP
Procedure for Collecting Ambient Carbonyl Compounds Samples using the
:C Sampling System
for Cleaning XAD-2® with QC Measures to Assure Cleanliness
for the Extraction and Analysis of PAH's from XAD-2® Traps
for Separately Funnel Liquid-Liquid Extraction by EPA SW-846 Method 35 IOC
for Continuous Liquid-Liquid Extraction by EPA SW-846 Method 3520C
for Acid-Base Partition Cleanup by EPA SW-846 Method 3650B
for Soxhlet Extraction by EPA SW-846 Method 3540C
for Maintenance of NANOpure-A Deionized Water System
for Daily Maintenance of Cold Storage Units
for Project Peer Review
for Preparing Method 25 Audit Samples Using the Transfill System
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
Appendix A
Revision No.: 6
Date: January 2003
Page No.: 4 of 4
SOP
No.
SOP Title
59
SOP for High Performance Liquid Chromatography
60
SOP for PDFID Sample Analysis
61
SOP for Standard Preparation Using Dynamic Flow Dilution System
62
SOP for UATMP & NMOC Canister Cleaning
64
SOP for Shipping Method 6, 7, 8, and 26 Audit Samples
66
Cylinder Recycling
67 SOP for Producing Standard Mixtures of Organic Compounds in Air by Liquid
Injection
69
SOP for Shipping Method 23 Audit Samples
70
SOP for Storing and Shipping Method 13 A, 13B, and 29 Audit Samples
71 SOP for Documentation Requirements for the GC/MS Laboratory and for GC/MS
Systems in the VOC Laboratory
72
SOP for Stack Sampling using FTIR Spectroscopy
73
SOP for the BCD Wipe Test
74 SOP for the Preparation of Spiked Sorbent Samples Using Liquid Spiking into
Tenax-GC® Tubes
75 SOP for the Preparation of Spiked Sorbent Samples Using Liquid Spiking onto
XAD-2®
76 SOP for the Preparation of Spiked Sorbent Samples Using Flash Evaporation Spiking
onto XAD-2®
Use or disclosure of proposal data is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix JJ
Kansas City Rounds 1 and 2
Vehicle Information
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
40
41
43
44
46
49
50
51
52
56
57
58
61
62
63
64
65
66
Date
7/13/2004
8/9/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/14/2004
7/14/2004
7/14/2004
7/14/2004
7/15/2004
7/15/2004
7/16/2004
7/16/2004
7/17/2004
7/17 72004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/20/2004
7/1 9/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/23/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/22/2004
7/23/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/26/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Dway
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84032
84154
84034
84035
84036
84037
84040
84039
84042
84043
84047
84048
84051
84050
84054
84052
84055
84061
84058
84057
84060
84056
84074
84063
84067
84064
84066
84071
84068
84069
84073
84072
84076
84077
84078
84079
84083
84082
84084
84086
84088
84090
84087
84091
Dyne
Rep
84062
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Isuzu
GMC
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Dodge
Ford
Honda
Honda
Mazda
Dodge
Jeep
Chevrolet
Honda
GMC
Oldsmobili
Jeep
Chevrolet
Chrysler
GM
Buick
Nissan
Nissan
GM-Saturr
Dodge
Mercury
Jeep
GM
Lincoln
Toyota
Dodge
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Lincoln
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Ford
Chevrolet
Honda
Nissan
Chevrolet
Ford
Hyundai
Cadillac
Model
Cavalier
F150
RAM250
Trooper
Yukon XL
Escort LX
F-250
RAV4
Spirit
F-150XLT
Civic
Civic
626
Caravan SE
Grand Cherokee
Corsica
Civic SI
Jimmy
Cutlass Ciera
Cherokee Sport
Cavalier
300
Saturn
LeSabre
Frontier
Pickup
Saturn
Caravan
Villager LS
Wrangler
Pontiac Grand Am
Continental
Solara SLE
Grand Caravan Sport
Blazer
S-10
Mustang
Town car
Civic EX
Accord
Accord LX
Accord EX
Taurus SES
Malibu LS
Odyssey
Pathfinder LE
Lumina
Mustang
Tiburon
Seville
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
2001
1979
1994
1999
2001
1995
1979
2000
1990
2001
1996
1991
2001
1989
1999
1996
2002
1995
1988
1998
1990
1999
2001
1998
2002
1987
1996
1995
1994
1995
1989
1989
2001
1997
1995
2003
1968
1990
1999
1997
1989
2000
2003
1998
2004
2003
1998
1999
2000
1991
Color
Silver
Red
Green
Black
Tan
Green
Brown
Purple
White
Black
Green
Green
White
Gray
Blue
White
White
Dark Red
Dark Red
White
Red
Blue
Green
Gray
Red
Purple
Blue
Green
Green
Grey
Brown
Silver
Teal
Green
Red
Green
White
Green
Green
Gold
White
Gray
Maroon
Grey
Silver
Maroon
Blue
Blue
Silver
Mo of Doors
4
2
2
4
4
2
2
4
4
2
2
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
2
4
3
2
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
2
2
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
N
N
L
L
N
N
N
N
L
N
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
Fuel Collected - could not get
fuel sample
PEMS only, no dyne test
Reject all wheel drive
Rejected 4 wheel drive will
not turn off
$20.00 added to tank
Reject all wheel drive - no
turn off/on button
Rejected all wheel drive
Envelope says too low idle,
Drecat exhaust leak,
untestable
PEMS only
PEMS only
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
67
68
69
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
88
90
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
102
103
104
105
107
108
109
110
112
113
114
116
117
118
120
121
123
124
126
Date
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
8/2/2004
7/29/2004
7/30/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/29/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
8/3/2004
8/2/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/29/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/11/2004
8/3/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/6/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/7/2004
8/6/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84092
84094
84096
84093
84098
84097
84101
84120
84099
84108
84119
84105
84103
84102
84110
84111
84113
84104
84107
84126
84125
84121
84165
84122
84127
84129
84132
84128
84131
84134
84133
84135
84138
84139
84140
84141
84148
84145
84149
84144
Dyne
Rep
84123
84115
84116
84109
84137
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Saturn
Ford
Isuzu
Toyota
Nissan
Ford
Mercury
Toyota
Honda
Toyota
Honda
Jeep
Dodge
Toyota
Nissan
Honda
Ford
Ford
Chevy
Pontiac
Ford
Chevrolet
Plymouth
Buick
Subaru
Ford
Ford
Volvo
Mazda
Dodge
Chrysler
Toyota
Jeep
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mercury
Buick
Ford
Ford
Chrysler
Ford
Chevrolet
Lincoln
Honda
Dodge
Jeep
Ford
Plymouth
Model
SL1
Explorer
Rodeo SL
RAV4
Sentra GXE
Ranger
Sable LS
Camry
Civic
Avalon
Civic DX
Grand Cherokee
RamLE
Corolla
Maxima
Civic
F-150
Contour
S-10
Grand Prix
Explorer
Silverado
Voyager
LeSabre
Outback Legacy
Thunderbird
Explorer XLT
S80
Protege
Grand Caravan SE
Town & Country
Celica
Cherokee Sport
Camry LE
Cavalier
Grand Marguis GS
Century Limited
Probe
Bronco
Concord
Escort ZX2
Blazer LS
Town car
Accord
Dvnastv
Cherokee
Escort
Voyager
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1999
1993
1999
2000
1997
1999
2002
1994
1984
1999
1991
1995
1991
1997
2000
1999
1995
1995
1996
1993
2000
2002
1998
1989
1996
1988
1995
2001
1991
1999
2000
1999
1993
2000
1997
1997
1998
1993
1995
2000
1999
2002
1987
1990
1988
1990
2002
1993
Color
Blue
White
Red
Black
Black
Gold
Gray
Green
Grey
Beige
Red
White
Silver
Green
White
Black
Green
Green
Green
Gold
Navy Blue
Gray
Gold
Blue
Green
Silver
Black
Silver
Burgundy
Green
Tan
Red
Green
Tan
Green
Green
Red
Red
Red
Blue
Black
White
Black
Tan
Grav
White
Red
Green
Mo of Doors
4
5
5
5
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
6
4
4
2
2
4
2
4
5
4
5
4
5
2
5
4
4
5
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
3
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
PEMS only
PEMS only too long for dyne
PEMS only, too long for dyne
PEMS only, AWD
PEM only too long for dyne
PEMS only
PEMS only- engine rebuilt
approx. 3,000 miles
PEMS only vehicle would not
go into third gear.
Transmission was slipping.
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
127
128
129
132
133
134
136
138
139
140
141
142
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
159
160
164
165
166
167
169
171
173
175
176
178
179
180
181
182
187
188
189
193
194
195
196
197
199
200
201
203
204
1012
207
208
Date
8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004
8/10/2004
8/1 0/2004
8/10/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/14/2004
8/1 3/2004
8/13/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/16/2004
8/16/2004
8/18/2004
8/1 6/2004
8/17/2004
8/17/2004
8/17/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/19/2004
8/19/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/24/2004
8/25/2004
8/25/2004
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84150
84151
84153
84146
84157
84162
84161
84166
84160
84164
84171
84168
84172
84167
84175
84174
84173
84179
84182
84178
84185
84184
84191
84183
84189
84188
84193
84195
84196
84192
84198
84197
84201
84208
84205
84204
84206
84209
84211
84210
84213
84215
84214
84216
Dyne
Rep
84156
84169
84180
84200
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Honda
Honda
Ford
Ford
Honda
Nissan
Kia
Chrysler
Volvo
Mercury
Ford
Plymouth
Honda
Buick
Cadillac
Ford
Pontiac
Mercury
Mercury
Jeep
Ford
Toyota
Toyota
Honda
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Subaru
Chevy
Hyundai
Mazda
Chevy
GMC
GMC
Saturn
Buick
Chevrolet
Chevy
Chew
Ford
Lincoln
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Dodge
Ford
Mazda
Oldsmobilf
Lincoln
Nissan
Pontiac
Ford
Model
Odyssey
Accord
F150
Ranger XLT
Accord LX
Sentra
Sportage
LeBaron
850
Topaz GS
Focus SE
Voyager
Civic DX
Regal
Cimmaron
Ranger
Bonneville
Topaz
Sable
Cherokee
Thunderbird LX
Camry
Corolla
Civic
Camry
Corolla
F150
Outback
Monte Carlo
Santa Fe
Miata MX-5
Lumina
Safari
Sonoma SLS
SL1
Regal
Astro Van
Caprice Classic
S-10 Truck
Econoline
Town car
F1 50 Truck
Windstar
C 1500
Stratus ES
Tempo
MX-6
Ninety Eight Regency
Town car
Maxima
Bonneville
F150
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
2000
2000
2000
1988
2001
1994
2003
1983
1997
1994
2001
1999
1988
1996
1986
1999
1988
1994
1996
1998
1995
1997
1996
2000
2000
2000
1984
2000
1977
2001
2003
1999
1993
2001
1994
1990
1991
1986
1985
1983
1989
1998
1999
1994
1996
1986
1988
1985
1987
1992
1994
1990
Color
Green
Red
Blue
Blue
Blue
Blue
Black
Burgundy
Green
White
Green
Purple
Burgundy
Gray
Gray
Green
Navy Blue/
Blue
Red
Black
Red
White
Green
Gray
Tan
White
Black
Green
Red
Burgundy
Red
Gold
White
Red
Lavendar
Red
Blue
Silver
Blue
Grav
White
Beige
Burgundy
Red
Black
Gray
Grav
White
Gold
Blue
Blue
White
Mo of Doors
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
2
4
2
2
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
2
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
L
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
PEMS only all wheel drive
on EGR valve
entered data from packet
PEMS only all wheel drive
PEMS only too wide for dyne
Please note engine light
comes on when you turn key.
Participant knows this. Keri
called.
Third vehicle w/same plate
(same as 181 S236)
PEMS only too wide for dyne
Dyno Semtech - Semtech
shutdown/locked up before
test. No time to fix problem.
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
210
212
213
214
215
216
219
221
222
223
225
226
228
232
233
234
235
236
237
239
240
241
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
253
254
255
259
282
290
293
294
297
298
299
300
301
302
304
Date
8/26/2004
8/25/2004
8/27/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/25/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Dway
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84224
84219
84231
84221
84220
84225
84227
84228
84223
84233
84230
84229
84234
84239
84238
84236
84235
84244
84241
84245
84240
84242
84246
84248
84257
84256
84250
84254
84253
84252
84258
84263
84261
84265
84266
84267
84271
84268
84270
84276
84274
Dyne
Rep
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Ford
Chrysler
Oldsmobilf
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Honda
Buick
Pontiac
Dodge
Toyota
Nissan
Oldsmobili
Volkswagc
Ford
Ford
Pontiac
Oldsmobili
84262
Geo
Ford
Ford
Cadillac
Honda
Infiniti
Plymouth
Eagle
Ford
Volvo
Chevy
Ford
Buick
Mercury
Ford
Plymouth
Dldsmobilf
Dodge
Toyota
Buick
Kia
Chevy
Buick
Ford
Mercury
Buick
Ford
Model
Taurus
Concord
Eighty-Eight
C10 (Truck)
Crown Victoria
Escort
Civic
Centurv
Grand Am
Grand Caravan
Corolla
Sentra
Silhouette
Cabriolet
Taurus
F1504X2
6000
Achieva
Prism
Escort
Contour
Sedan de Ville
Accord
130
Voyager
Talon
Ranger
240 GL
S-10
Escort
Regal
Sable
Taurus
Acclaim
Delta 88
Ram 50
Camry
Century
Sephia
Cavalier
LeSabre
F150
Grand Marquis
Electra ParkAve
Aspire
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
2002
1994
1994
1973
1985
1992
2000
1997
1992
2005
1989
1993
2000
1991
1987
1987
1988
1992
1990
1993
1998
1993
1987
1998
1997
1994
1987
1983
1989
1987
1992
1997
2001
1990
1991
1989
1989
1984
2000
1989
1979
1994
1986
1989
1995
Color
Silver
Teal
Plum
Yellow
Light Gray
Red
Beige
Blue
Red
Gray
White
Red
White
Dark Blue
Lt Blue
Gray
White
Green
Blue
Burqundv
Lt Blue
Red
Dirty Silver
Gold
Blue
Green
Blue
Silver
Blue
Gray
Blue
Gray
Gray
Blue
White
Red
Blue
Lt Brown
Gold
Gray
Lt. Tan
White
White
Gold
Red
Mo of Doors
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
Dway file blank, no data
File name corrupted
PEMS only
Originally listed as dway, but
none performed
Added oil (2 qts.)
PEMS only
Third vehicle w/same plate
(same as 181 S199)
Originally listed as dway, but
none performed
Fixing brakes - 2 pm pick up
9/2
Keeping extra day - pick up
9/2
Mew windshield from
Buckner's
PEMS only, exhaust leak
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
305
306
307
308
309
312
314
315
316
317
318
319
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
335
336
337
338
339
341
343
344
346
347
348
982
349
350
351
352
354
355
356
358
359
Date
9/10/2004
9/11/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/13/2004
9/14/2004
9/13/2004
9/14/2004
9/13/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/1 6/2004
9/15/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/20/2004
9/17/2004
9/17/2004
9/17/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/17/2004
9/18/2004
9/29/2004
9/18/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84272
84273
84278
84277
84286
84285
84287
84291
84289
84293
84295
84302
84301
84300
84297
84292
84298
84296
84304
84307
84308
84305
84303
84309
84310
84315
84316
84311
84318
84322
84317
84314
84319
84375
84321
84325
84324
84327
84329
84323
84334
84335
Dyne
Rep
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Honda
Jeep
GMC
MG
Oldsmobilf
Honda
GMC
Dodge
Honda
Oldsmobilf
84312
84328
Volvo
Chevy
Dodge
Ford
Pontiac
Buick
Dodge
Toyota
Dodge
Honda
Honda
Honda
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Oldsmobilf
Mercedes
Chevy
Ford
Chevy
Plymouth
Dodge
Toyota
Nissan
Toyota
Nissan
Plymouth
Toyota
Ford
Toyota
Nissan
Toyota
Ford
Jeep
Kia
Chevrolet
Mercury
Model
Accord
Grand Cherokee
Jimmy
MG
Silhouette
Civic
Sierra
Pickup
Civic
stom Cruiser Station Wat
GL
Caprice
Ram
F150
Grand Prix
LeSabre
Stratus
Camry
Durango
Civic
Civic
Accord
Grand Am
Malibu
Silhouette
280 SE
G-20
F150
Venture
Voyager
Avenger
Corolla
Sentra
Camry
Altima
Sundance
Camry
Wmdstar
Avalon
Maxima
Camry
Taurus
Wrangler
Rio
Caprice-estate
Grand Marguis
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
2001
1995
1990
1978
1997
2000
1995
1968
1997
1984
1984
1987
1997
1993
1989
1990
1996
1997
1999
1998
2001
1992
1994
1999
2002
1973
1993
1997
2003
1991
1996
1989
1997
1990
2000
1989
1998
2001
1996
1997
1999
1998
1997
2004
1990
1988
Color
Blue
Black
RedSWni
Brown
White
Gray
Red
Black
Gold
Gray
Blue
White
White
Gray
Silver
Blue
White
Red
Black
Gray
White
Green
Gray
Tan
Gray
Blue
Burgundy
Silver
Blue
Black
Gray
Red
Gold
Green
Red
Gold
White
Tan
Green
Gray
Lt. Blue
Red
White
Gray
White
Mo of Doors
4
4
2
2
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
3
2
4
3
2
2
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
N
N
N
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
PEMS only
THC @ startup approx. 7000
PPm
Rejected - Hazard on dyne,
incapable of proper testing
THC 5,000
THC reading over 10,000
PEMS only too wide for dyne
THC 4,000
THC 11,572 start up engine
stall
rHC 9,000 start up
PEMS only too wide for dyne
PEMS only too long for dyne,
must go on long PEMS only
route
THC 7,500 start up
THC 8,800 startup
THC 21 .9 start up on 1 ,000 &
10,000
THC 7.9 - on start
rHC 9,200 startup
FHC 3200 on start
FHC 4,000 start up
FHC 58,000 start up
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
360
361
363
364
367
368
369
372
373
374
377
379
381
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
394
395
398
399
416
417
419
420
421
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
Date
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
a/24/2004
0/24/2004
0/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
a/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/27/2004
9/29/2004
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84336
84330
84332
84331
84339
84342
84337
84343
84347
84344
84345
84351
84354
84353
84349
84284
84280
84279
84283
84281
84359
84356
84357
84355
84362
84363
84361
84367
84365
84373
84369
84372
84368
84370
84366
84376
Dyne
Rep
84341
84338
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Toyota
Chevy
Pontiac
Saturn
Plymouth
Tovota
Ford
Kia
Toyota
Toyota
Oldsmobili
84350
GM/Chev^
Ford
Ford
Saturn
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Toyota
Dodge
Chevy
Toyota
Pontiac
Mercury
Chevrolet
Ford
Tovota
Nissan
Mercedes
Ford
Chevrolet
Volvo
Tovota
Saturn
Ford
Oldsmobili
Honda
Model
Pickup
Cavalier
Grand Am SE
Sedan
Voyager
Camry
Ranger
Sedona
Corolla
Sienna
Cutlass
Lumina
Contour
F150
Wagon
Tracker
Caprice Classic Wagon
Escort
Camry
Ram
Suburban
Corolla
Grand Am
Tracer
Lumina
Taurus SE
Corolla
Maxima
Sel
Taurus
Astro
850 Turbo
Camrv
SL1
Taurus
Cutlass Wagon
Odyssey
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1987
2004
1997
2001
1999
1994
2003
2004
1995
2000
1987
1997
1996
1989
1993
2003
1987
1999
2001
1986
1995
1992
1997
1995
2001
1998
1996
2002
1980
1993
1990
1996
1994
1997
1995
1989
2000
Color
Blue
Black
Tan
White
Green
Dark Gree
Tan
Tan
Green
Tan
Gray
Red
Tan
Blue
Red
Burgundy
Blue
Green
White
Red
Tan
Blue/Gray
Dark Gree
Red
Burgundy
Tan
White
Gray
Brown
Silver
Red
Red
Beige
Tan
Green
White
Gray
Mo of Doors
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
THC 15,000
rHC 2,200 startup
rHC 13, 000 start up
Added a guart and a half of
oil
FHC 8,000 start up
me 9,800 start up
Start THC- 3,300 ppmC
THC 1 1 ,000 start up
Died on preconditioning route
#2, never was on dyne, start
THC 24,000 ppm
Check oil light came on after
test, added 1/2 gt. oil, THC
1 1 ,400 start up
Start THC 5,900 ppm C
Start THC- 10,000 ppm C
THC 8,500 start up,
Extended route for PEMS
was ran
me start up 1 1 ,000
B000038 on drive away
Muffler on truck was broke
Start THC - 4,400 ppm C,
Have to fix muffler in order to
test
me 8,000 start up,
Alignment is off
FHC 4,000 start up,
Screw/bolt has been
replaced from exhaust to
manifold and possibly
coming loose again
Start THC -5,000 ppm C,
Added fuel
FHC 8,300 start up
Start THC - 4,700 ppm C
Start THC - 5,000 ppm C
THC 11, 000
THC 5,500 start up
Start THC - 1 1 ,000 ppm C,
To turn key ignition switch
oose
me 7,000 start up, Do not
mess with radio, Rotors?,
Check engine light is on
me 11, ooo start up
THC 4,000 start up
Start THC = 9,700 ppm C
Start THC -9,800 ppm C,
Leak in muffler?
Start THC 9,700 ppm C,
Check engine light, Vehicle
License - Shown as VEM
439 and VEM 432
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
432
433
434
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
Round 2
530
531
532
533
534
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
559
555
556
557
558
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
1013
569
570
Date
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/16/2005
1/17/2005
1 16/2005
1 18/2005
1 18/2005
1 18/2005
1 18/2005
1 18/2005
1 18/2005
1 19/2005
1 19/2005
1 19/2005
1/19/2005
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Dway
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84380
84381
84379
84383
84384
84377
84386
84382
84396
84397
84393
84394
84399
84401
84398
84402
84406
84404
84407
84403
84408
84413
84409
84412
84411
84419
84418
84414
84415
84416
84422
84425
84420
84424
84421
84428
84430
84426
84427
84431
84433
84437
84442
84436
84432
Dyne
Rep
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Lincoln
Ford
Mercury
Pontiac
Toyota
Chevrolet
GEO
Ford
Honda
Nissan
Volkswagc
Ford
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Honda
Honda
Plymouth
Honda
Honda
Toyota
Dodge
Pontiac
Dodge
Mercury
Ford
Chevrolet
Honda
Saturn
Chevrolet
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Dodge
Honda
Jeep
Jeep
Honda
Ford
Saturn
Chevy
Dodge
Saturn
Mitsubishi
Mercury
Jeep
Toyota
Toyota
Chevrolet
Saturn
Model
Continental
F-150
Marguis
Grand Am GT
Camry
Avalanche
Prism
Bronco
Accord
Maxima
Cabrio
Escort LX
Silverado
300M
Odyssey
Accord
Voyager
Accord
Civic
Corolla
Caravan
Grand AM
Caravan
Sable
F250
Malibu
Civic
Lumina
Grand Am
Impala
Durango
Civic
Cherokee
Grand Cherokee
Accord
Explorer
LS1
Malibu
Spirit
SC2
Galant
Grand Marguis Station V
Wrangler
Camry
Camry
S-10
Sedan
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1995
1989
1994
1998
1996
2002
1996
1990
1997
1990
1999
1995
1976
1999
2000
1997
1998
2001
1991
1995
1997
1989
2000
2002
1979
1999
1996
1996
1998
1997
2003
1999
1998
1998
1995
2000
1995
2000
1998
1990
2001
2001
1991
1997
1994
1994
1995
1999
Color
Green
Red
Blue
Red
Gray
Tan
Green
Green
Red
Burgundy
Green
Green
Yellow &V
Burgundy
Dark Greer
Dark Greer
Gold
Black
Red
Turguoise
Green
Gray
White
Grev
Dark Browr
Gray
Dark Greer
Purple
Maroon
Gold
Silver
Red
Black
Burgundy
White
Red
Black
Gray
Burgundy
White
Burgundy
Cream
Burgundy
Red
Green
Green
White
Burgundy
Mo of Doors
4
2
2
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
N
N
N
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Coolant temp 55.40 dec
Engine coolant 44.6 de
Engine coolant 39.2 de
Engine coolant 30.2 de
Engine coolant 44.60 d
Engine coolant 28.4 de
Engine coolant 32 deg
Engine coolant 39.2 de
Engine coolant 32 deg
Engine coolant 32 deg
Coolant temp 35.6 deg
Coolant temp 39.2 deg
Engine coolant 37.4 de
Engine coolant 44.6 de
Fuel economy 27.32; er
Comments
Start THC ~ 5,500 ppm 1
PEMS only, Gas gauge does
not work, Start THC = 9,000
ppmC
Start THC ~ 5,400 ppm C
Start THC ~ 5,500 ppm C
Start THC -4,000 ppm C,
PEMS only too long for dyne
Missing gas cap
PEMS only too wide for dyne
THC 2,000
Start THC -4,1 00 ppm C
Flow meter J04-SE06; clean c
Flow meter K04-5E03; 3 gt of
Oil dirty, J04-SE05.
Clean oil, flow meter J04-SEC
Oil clean, flow meter J04-SEC
Flow meter J04-SE05 (flow m
Oil clean, J04-SE05, 18.8 mp
Oil dirty, FM#J04-SE06, 19.0
Oil clean, FMJ04SE06, 19.8
Flow meter H04-SE02, oil cle
Flow meter J04-SE05, oil clea
9.628 mpg
Oil clean, FMW04-SE05
Oil dirty, FM #K04-SE03.
Oil dirty.
Oil clean, flow meter J04-SEO
Model - nothing recorded here
Oil moderate, flow meter H04
Oil clean.
Oil clean, flow meter H04-SEC
Oil clean, flow meter K04-SEC
Oil clean, flow meter #J04-SE
Oil dirty, flow meter K04-SEOC
Oil moderate, fuel economy 8
Flow meter J04-SE05, oil clea
Oil dirty, K04-SE03, mileage E
Flow meter J04-SE05, 25.0 m
Oil clean, J04-SE05, fuel ecor
Flow J04-SE06, oil dirty, mile;
Flowmeter J04-SE05, oil clea
Flow J04-SE05, mileage 22. 3
Oil clean, mileage 9.9
Oil clean, flow K04-SE03, 9.1
Flow meter J04-SE05; oil clea
Oil medium; mpg 22.194. Dup
Flow meter K04-SE03; 1 0.2 rr
Oil medium; flow J04-SE06
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
571
572
574
575
576
577
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
593
594
595
597
599
600
602
605
606
607
608
609
611
612
614
616
617
618
619
622
623
624
625
627
628
631
632
633
634
635
638
639
640
641
642
643
Date
1/18/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/19/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/26/2005
1/25/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/28/2005
1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
2/2/2005
2/1/2005
2/1/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84434
84438
84443
84439
84448
84445
84444
84449
84453
84452
84456
84455
84458
84462
84467
84459
84465
84463
84464
84469
84475
84470
84472
84473
84477
84474
84478
84482
84479
84487
84485
84488
84492
84494
84495
84493
84497
84498
84499
84500
84502
84503
84504
Dyne
Rep
84440
84451
84468
84483
84484
84490
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Buick
Chevy
Buick
Ford
Geo
Pontiac
Plymouth
Saturn
Chevrolet
Buick
Nissan
Ford
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Plymouth
Ford
Ford
Chevy
Ford
Dodge
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Mercedes
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Honda
Jeep
Dodge
Buick
Dodge
Mazda
Cadillac
Ford
Buick
Buick
Chevy
Ford
GMC
Ford
Toyota
Chevy
Toyota
Acura
Nissan
Chrysler
Ford
Chrysler
Model
Park Avenue
Silverado
Century
F150
Prizm
Bonneville
Voyager
Sedan
Tracker
Regal
Maxima
Taurus
Grand Prix Le
Mustang
Aerostar
Voyager
Ranger
Aerostar
Lumina LS
Contour
Intrepid
Caravan
Silverado 1500
Tempo
280 SE
Monte Carlo
Explorer
Ram
Civic
Cherokee
Neon
Lasabre
Caravan
B2200
Fleetwood
Ranger
Rainer
Lesabre
C10 Silverado
Ranger XLT
Sonoma
Freestar SEL
4RunnerSR5
Suburban
Sienna XLE
Integra
Frontier
Concord
Taurus
Concord LXI
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1995
2002
2001
2001
1991
1995
1999
2001
2003
1994
1995
1995
1993
1995
1993
1989
1988
1992
1994
1995
1994
1989
1996
1986
1973
1977
1996
1989
1988
1998
1996
1979
1996
1992
1991
1990
2004
1995
1984
1997
1996
2004
1995
1995
2001
1995
1998
1996
2002
2000
Color
Blue
Grey
Dark Blue
White
Burgundy
Green
Green
White
Burgundy
Purple
Black
White
Champagr
Crismon
Burgundy
Blue
Dark Blue
Burgundy
Light Blue
Green
Burgundy
Grey
Black
Gray
Silver
Red
Blue
Red
Burgundy
White
Blue
Yellow
Green
Green
White
Grey
White
Dark Blue
Tan
White
Red
Light Gree
Black
White
Champagr
Dark Gree
White
Burgundy
Grey
Silver
Mo of Doors
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Coupe Com
2 + hatchba
2 + hatch
2
4
2 + hatch
4
4
2 + hatch
2
4
4
2
4
2
4
4 + hatch
4
4
4 + hatch
2
4
2
4 + hatch
4
2
2 + hatch
2
4 + hatch
4 + hatch
4
4 + hatch
2
2
4
4
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
M
N
L
M
M
M
N
L
M
L
M
N
M
N
N
N
L
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
Oil dirty; flow meter K04-SEOC
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mils
Oil clean; flow meter K04-SGI
Oil clean; flow meter K04-SEC
FM J04-SE06; oil dirty; mileac
Oil medium; flow K04-SE03; n
Oil clean; flow meter K04-SEC
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE06; milea
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE06; milea
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mils
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE03; milea
Oil medium; mileage 19.2
Oil dirty; flowJ04-SE06; milea
This vehicle was not PEMED.
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; F.M. #I04-SE08; mr.
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE06; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE08; mpg
Oil medium/dirty; flow K04-SE
Oil dirty; mpg 21 .389
Oil medium; flow K04-SE03; n
Oil clean; 15.2 mpg; flow metf
Oil medium; mpg 7.2; flow I04
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow meter K04-SEOC
Oil dirty; flow meter L04-SE1 3
Flow meter L04-SE13; mpg 2
Oil clean; flow K04-SE04; mp
Oil clean; flow L04-SE13; mpc
Flow meter K04-SE03; oil dirt
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow meter I04-SE08
1/31/05 - flowmeter I04-SE03
Oil dirty; flow meter J04-SE06
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oil dirty; FM# K04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow meter K04-SEOC
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE06; mpg
Oil medium; flowJ04-SE06; n
Oil medium; flow I04-SE03; m
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oil clean; flow meter I04-SEO
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oil clean; flow L04-SE13; mpc
Oil medium; flow I04-SE08; m
Oil dirtv; mileage 18. 701 ; FM*
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
644
645
646
647
648
649
651
521
984
653
654
655
656
660
661
662
663
664
667
1014
668
670
671
674
675
676
677
679
680
681
682
685
686
985
689
693
694
695
696
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
709
711
Date
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/6/2005
2/8/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/1 7/2005
2/1 8/2005
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84505
84509
84510
84508
84512
84513
84515
84514
84518
84525
84519
84517
84526
84524
84520
84521
84522
84528
84527
84531
84529
84533
84534
84532
84538
84539
84541
84537
84546
84547
84548
84550
84551
84552
84554
84553
84557
84560
84558
84561
84567
84562
84566
84564
84563
84572
Dyne
Rep
84542
84543
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Dodge
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevy
Ford
Honda
Chevy
Mitsubishi
Dodge
Chrysler
Buick
Chevrolet
Dodge
Dodge
Lincoln
Isuzu
Ford
Honda
Chevy
Mercury
Dodge
Geo
Plymouth
Honda
Chevy
Subaru
Pontiac
Ford
Chevy
Dodge
Jeep
Dodge
Toyota
Dodge
Lincoln
Isuzu
Olds
Ford
Dodge
Buick
Dodge
Chevy
Ford
Cadillac
Dodge
Honda
Dodge
Ford
Mercury
Model
Intrepid
F150
Astrovan
Suburban
F150
Civic
Caprice
Montero
Stratus
Concorde
Skylark
Astro Van
Caravan
Grand Caravan
Town car
Pickup
Taurus
Accord
C1500
Grand Marguis
RamPU
Tracker
Sundance
CRV
Suburban
Legacy Wagon
Montana
Ranger
Tahoe
Grand Caravan
Cherokee Sport
Dakota
Corolla
Intrepid
Town Car
Axiom
Silhoutte
F150
Durango RT
Park Avenue
Dakota
S-10
Country Sguire
Sedan Deville
Dakota
Odvssev
Grand Caravan
Ranger
Topaz
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1993
1989
1992
1994
2001
1992
1982
2003
1999
2002
1994
1993
1992
1998
1991
1995
2001
1997
1996
1994
1995
1992
1992
1998
1999
1993
2003
1998
1996
1996
2000
1999
1995
1995
1988
2002
2002
1992
2002
2000
1998
2001
1986
1992
2004
1995
1998
2002
1994
Color
Brown/Gre
Tan/Brown
White
White
White
Dark Grey
Blue
Black
Beige
Champagr
Red
Blue
White
White
Blue Navy
Red
Grey/Silver
White
Red
Dark Blue
Burgundv
Yellow
Green
Red
Grey
Burgundy
White
Red
Burgundy
White
Gray
Blue
Green
Burgundy
Black
Beige
Beige
White
Black
Blue/Grev
Green
Black
Brown & G
Blue
Grey
Silver
Burgundy
White
White
Mo of Doors
4
2
2 + back
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2 + hatch
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
2
4
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
N
H
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; mpg 1 1 .01 25; flow m
Oil medium; flow K04-SE03; n
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Mpg 16.26; FM #I04-SE03. P
Oil dirty; flow meter L04-SE1 3
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Mpg 8.26; flow meter K04-SE
Oil medium; flow K04-SE01 ; n
Oil dirty; flowH04-SE08; mpg
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil dirty; flow meter K04-SEOC
Oil clean; fm #H04-SE08; mp
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Flow meter I04-SE08; oil clea
Oil medium; flow H04-SE08; r
Oil medium; flow K04-SE01 ; n
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil moderate; FM #I04-SE03;
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Mpg 20.762; oil dirty
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE01 ; mpg
Oil clean; flow L04-SE13; mpc
Flow meter H04-SE08; oil dirt
Oil medium; flow K04-SE01 ; n
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil clean; flow meter I04-SEO
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirtv; flow K04-SE01 (2 inc
Oil clean; flow meter H04-SEC
Oil clean; mpg 17.098
Oil dirty; flow meter K04-SEO'
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Mpg 1 5.899; flow meter H04-J
Oil clean; mpg 19.282; flow m
Oil medium; flow I04-SE03; m
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil medium; flow K04-SE01 ; n
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil dirty; flow meter I04-SE03
Oil clean; flow meter H04-SEC
Oil medium; flow I04-SE03; m
Oil dirtv; flow L04-SE13; mpg
Oil medium; flowH04-SE08; r
Oil clean; mpg 14.81; Flowm
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE01 . Mod
-------
Vehi e
ID
Roun 1
71
71
714
715
716
718
719
721
722
723
724
726
727
728
729
730
731
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
743
744
745
747
749
750
751
753
986
987
757
759
760
761
764
766
767
769
770
772
773
774
775
776
111
778
779
Date
2/1 8/2005
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/1 9/2005
2/19/2005
2/21/2005
3/11/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2004
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2004
2/26/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/1/2005
3/2/2005
3/2/2005
3/3/2005
3/3/2005
3/3/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84568
84569
84570
84574
84573
84575
84577
84645
84675
84713
84730
84582
84581
84638
84585
84584
84734
84587
84588
84589
84688
84592
84593
84591
84597
84595
84596
84718
84599
84600
84601
84739
84603
84733
84605
84611
84609
84608
84613
84627
84612
84614
Dyne
Rep
84681
84722
84632
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevy
Ford
Buick
Chevrolet
Ford
Volvo
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
BMW
Chevy
Chrysler
Ford
Ford
Nissan
Plymouth
Dodge
Mercury
Buick
Saturn
Ford
Ford
Ford
Honda
Ford
Toyota
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Ford
Buick
Jeep
Mazda
Datsun
Buick
Jeep
Datsun
Honda
Toyota
Buick
Ford
Nissan
Oldsmobilf
Ford
Ford
Ford
Oldsmobilf
Model
Ranger
Taurus
S-10Pickup
Silverado
Taurus
Park Avenue
Lumina
Windstar
960
Tempo
Blazer
S-1 0 LS
528e
Corsica
Town & Country
Ranger
Escort
Pickup XE
Voyager
Caravan SE
Villager
Lesabre
SL2
Taurus
Escape
LTD
Accord EX
EconolineE150
4 Runner
Sunbird
Escort SE
Taurus GL
Windstar
Avalon
Explorer
Regal
Cherokee
Protege
210 Wagon
Skylark
Grand Cherokee
280Z
Civic
Camry
Regal
E-150
Quest
Delta 88
F-150
Ranger XLT
F-250
Delta 88
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1996
1995
1994
1994
1993
1993
1994
1998
1993
1993
1996
1995
1988
1995
1996
1994
1993
1995
1993
1995
1997
1978
2001
1993
2002
1979
1998
2001
1993
1994
1998
1997
1998
1998
1993
1979
1988
1998
1979
1998
1993
1977
1999
1989
1978
1991
1996
1990
1987
2000
1989
1978
Color
Black
Green
Burgundy
Blue
Burgundy
Dark Blue
Gray
Dark Greer
Blue
Red
Black
Black
Black
Red
White
Green
Gray
Black
Green
White
Navy
White
Silver
Green
Mavy
Dark Blue
Green
Dark Blue
Burgundy
White
White
Blue
Purple
Cream
Black
Green
Gold
Silver
Tan
Green
Green
Rust
Green
Burgundy
Burgundy
White
Burgundy
White
Red
Burgundy
Blue
Beige
Mo of Doors
2
4
2
2
4
4
3
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
N
L
N
L
N
L
N
N
N
L
L
N
M
N
N
H
H
L
N
N
L
N
N
L
M
L
L
N
M
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
Y
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
P1450/P0302
Comments
Oil clean; flow K04-SE01 ; mp
Oil dirty; flow L04-SE13; mpg
Dyned only vehicle. Give to R
Oil clean; mpg 12.84; FM#HC
Oil dirty; mpg 21 .35; flow met
Oil clean; mpg 17.01; FM#HO
Oil dirty; flow meter I04-SE03
Oil dirty; mpg 1 8.586; flow me
Oil clean; flow L04-SE13;mpt
Oil dirty; flow L04-SE1 3; mpg
Oil medium;flowmeter H04-E
Oil dirty; flow L04-SE13; mpg
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil clean; flow meter I04-SEO
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow meter K04-SEC
Oil medium; flow K04-SE01 ; n
Oilmedium;flowH04-SE08
Oil dirty; flow L04-SE13; mpg
Oil dirty; mpg 20.61 ; fm #H04
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil medium; flow I04-SE08; m
Oil mildly dirty: Flow K04SEO
Mo Muffler. Need key to trunk
Oil clean; flow J04-SE06; mpc
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; mpg 16.84; flow HO
Oil dirty; mpg 10.20; flow L04-
Oil medium;flowJ04-SE06; n
Oil dirty; flow L04-SE13; mpg
Oil dirty; fm #I04-SE03. Hit lot
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; mpg 1 6.31 ; fm #H 04
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil dirty; mpg 1 7.291 ; flow I04
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE06; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg 22.1
Oilmedium;flowH04-SE08;r
Oil dirty; flow L04-SE13; mpg
Oil medium; flowmeter J04-SE
Oil medium; mpg 32.972; FM
Oil dirty; flow meter H04-SEOI
Flowmeter I04-SE03. PEMS 6
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil medium; flow I04-SE03.
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
780
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
791
792
795
796
797
799
453
462
491
495
506
511
518
665
800
801
802
804
805
806
807
808
809
811
813
815
816
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
833
Date
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/4/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/4/2005
4/4/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
3/14/2005
3/9/2005
3/9/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/1 0/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/1 2/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/15/2005
3/1 5/2005
3/1 5/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Dway
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84617
84616
84618
84620
84621
84623
84626
84622
84628
84635
84630
84629
84755
84761
84763
84757
84754
84749
84748
84747
84654
84634
84633
84637
84639
84642
84643
84640
84644
84648
84646
84649
84650
84653
84655
84659
84662
84656
84658
84660
84667
84661
84666
84665
84663
84670
Dyne
Rep
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Chevy
Plymouth
Plymouth
Ford
Ford
Ford
Volkswagc
Plymouth
Dodge
Toyota
Chevy
Ford
Honda
Acura
Honda
Kia
Honda
Jeep
Plymouth
Toyota
Dodge
Dodge
Oldsmobili
Plymouth
Volvo
Oldsmobili
Chevy
Dodge
Ford
Ford
Nissan
Dodge
Honda
GMC
Nissan
Chevy
Chevrolet
Buick
Chrysler
Cadillac
Chevy
Chevy
Dodge
Ford
Buick
Ford
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mercury
Model
Suburban
Voyager
Voyager
Ranger XLT
Ranger
Econoline
Beetle
Acclaim
Ram Pickup
Camry
Trail Blazer
Crown Victoria LTD
Accord SEi
2.5 TL
Econoline
Odyssey
Sedona
Odyssey
Cherokee 4x4
Voyager
Sienna LE
Grand Caravan
Grand Caravan
Cutlass
Voyager SE
740 Turbo
Cutlass
Cavalier
Spirit
Escort
Explorer
Pathfinder
SE Dakota
Accord LXI
Sonoma
Pickup
Lumina APV
C20 Pickup
Park Avenue Electra
LeBaron
Eldorado
Lumina
Astrovan
Caravan SE
F250 Pickup
Century
F-150
Pickup
Corsica
Topaz
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1997
1999
1992
1992
1992
1996
1973
1989
1987
1999
2002
1989
1989
1996
1986
2002
2004
2003
2001
2003
2001
2002
2003
1990
1988
1987
Supreme
1995
1989
1987
1994
2001
1987
1988
1995
1988
1990
1977
1990
1988
1990
1990
1989
1988
1982
1990
1988
1989
1989
1989
Color
Blue
Burgundy
White
Green
Burgundy
White
Black
Gray
Gray
Pewter
White
Silver
Tan
White
Beige
Beige
Silver
Blue
Red
Silver
Gold
Champagr
Gray
Silver
Gold
Green
Burgundy
Burgundy
Blue
Green
Green
Gray
Black
Red
Red
Grey
Yellow
White
Red
Blue
Burgundy
Blue two tc
Burgundy
Grey
White
Blue
Red
Blue
Burgundy
Mo of Doors
4
4
4
2
2
3
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
4
2
2
3
2
4
2
4
3
3
3
2
4
2
2
4
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
N
N
L
L
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
L
L
N
N
N
N
N
L
L
L
L
L
N
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
N
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE06; mpg
Oil clean; flow L04-SE13; mpc
Oil dirty; flow meter L04-SE1 3
FM H04-SE08; oil dirty. PEM:
Oil dirty; fm #K04-SE01 ; mpg
Oil clean; flow meter #J04-SE
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Oil dirty; mpg 22.29; flow met
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oilmedium;flowH04-SE08;r
Oil dirty; flow J04-SE06; mpg
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
No tests done. No PEMS don
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter K04-SEO
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil medium;flowH04-SE08; r
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; FM H04SE08; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter I04-SE03
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flowmeter L04-SE13
Dyne test done only. No PEM
Oil medium; flow K04-SE01 .
Oil clean; flowmeter L04-SE1
Flowmeter L04-SE1 3
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Oil dirty; flowmeter H04-SEOE
FlowH04-SE02;mpg18.23
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow H04-SE02; mp
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oil dirty (added guart); flowme
Oil dirty; flowmeter I04-SE03;
Oil clean; flowmeter K04-SEO
Oil medium; flow H04-SE08; r
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Flowmeter K04-SE03; mpg 1E
Flowmeter K04-SE01 ; mpg 2C
Oil dirty; flowmeter K04-SE01
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
842
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
855
856
857
858
859
862
866
867
870
871
872
873
875
876
877
878
881
883
885
887
888
889
891
894
895
897
898
901
902
903
904
905
906
910
911
913
915
916
Date
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/29/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/18/2005
3/17/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/19/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
4/7/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
4/1/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
3/28/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/29/2005
3/29/2005
3/31/2005
4/1/2005
4/1/2005
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Yes
Yes
Dway
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84672
84669
84735
84674
84668
84673
84676
84679
84677
84680
84687
84686
84683
84685
84682
84690
84694
84693
84692
84689
84699
84700
84777
84706
84707
84701
84705
84702
84703
84708
84709
84710
84714
84717
84715
84743
84720
84719
84732
84723
84724
84727
84726
84729
84728
84738
84737
84740
84745
Dyne
Rep
84695
84712
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Toyota
Dodge
Honda
Pontiac
Oldsmobilf
GMC
Ford
Toyota
Cadillac
Buick
Chevrolet
GMC
Chew
Ford
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Dldsmobilf
Chevrolet
Ford
Buick
GMC
Chevrolet
Ford
Oldsmobilf
Chevrolet
Chevy
Ford
Chevy
Chevy
Chevy
Dodge
Ford
Chevy
Saturn
Ford
VW
Mazda
Mazda
Chevy
Oldsmobilf
Jeep
Chevy
Oldsmobilf
Ford
Ford
Subaru
Toyota
Ford
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Buick
Honda
Chevy
Model
Tercel SR5
Spirit
Accord
Firebird
Delta 88
Vandura
Bronco
Pickup
Fleetwood
Park Avenue
Cheyenne Pickup
1 500 SLE Sierra
El Camino
F-150
Ranger
F-150
Camry
Cutlass
C-10
F-150
Century
Jimmy
Caprice
F-150
Cutlass Supreme
Nova
Impala
F-150
Malibu
G20 Van
Blazer 4x4
Caravan ES
Ranger XLT
Monte Carlo
Station Wagon
Mustang
Thing
B2200
Protege
Silverado 1500
Cutlass
CJ-7
Cavalier
Cutlass Cierra
Granada
Aerostar
Forester
Camry
Escape
Grand Prix
Celebrity
LeSabre
Civic
Van 20
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1983
1990
1988
1979
1991
1983
1990
1983
1989
1989
1973
1988
1976
1986
1990
1988
1990
1989
1983
1988
1988
1992
1985
1978
1987
1976
1973
1990
1980
1989
1987
2003
1989
1984
1994
1979
1974
1988
1999
1989
1990
1979
1991
1990
1982
1990
2001
2001
2002
1976
1984
1990
1990
1986
Color
Red
Silver/Blue
Gray
Blue
Silver
Gray
Burgundv
White
Blue
Burgundv
Black
White/Gref
Silver
Rust
Blue
Red
Light Blue
Brown
White
Red
Gray
Black
Burgundy
White
White
Burgundy
Yellow
Brown
Blue
Blue
Brown
Red
Burgundy
White
Green
Silver w/or
Beige
Grey
Tan
Burgundy
Blue
Black
Red
Burgundy
Beige
Burgundv
White
Gray
Red
Red
Blue
Burgundy
Burgundy
Black
Mo of Doors
2
4
4
2
4
3
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
2
4
Van
2
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
2
4
4
2
3
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
L
L
L
L
M
L
L
H
N
H
M
M
M
M
H
L
L
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
M
N
L
L
L
N
M
L
N
N
M
L
N
L
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
Oil clean; flow H04-SE02; mp
Oil clean; fiowmeter L04-SE1
Driveawaympg 22.144
Oil dirty; flowmeter H04-SEOE
Fiowmeter K04-SE03; mpg 17
Oil dirty; flowmeter H04-SE03
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE01 ; mpg
Oil dirty; flowmeter K04-SE03
Precon. after dvne not able to
Oil dirty; flowmeter H04-SE08
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; 13.8
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE02; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Oil clean; flow K04-SE01;mp
Oil dirty; flowmeter K04-SE01
Oil dirty; flowmeter H04-SEOE
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Flowmeter H04-SE02; mpg 1C
Oil clean; flowmeter K04-SEO
Oil clean; flowmeter I04-SE03
Flowmeter K04-SE03; mpg 7.
Flowmeter H04-SE08; mpg 1"
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirtv; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirtv; flow K04-SE01 ; mpg
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow H04-SE02; mp
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirtv; flow I04-SE08; mpg
Oil clean; flow H04-SE02; mp
Oil dirty (air cooled), flow I04-
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE02; mpg
Oil clean; flow H04-SE02; mp
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil - low on oil; flowmeter K04
Oil dirty; flowmeter I04-SE03;
Oil clean; flow H04-SE03; mp
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil dirty; flow K04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flow I04-SE03; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter I04-SE08
Oil clean; mpg 19.18. PAMS!'
Oil clean; flowmeter I04-SE03
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Flowmeter H04-SE02; mpg 21
Oil medium; flow I04-SE03; m
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE08; mpg
Oil dirty; flow I04-SE03; mpg
-------
Vehicle
ID*
Round 1
917
918
921
922
923
924
989
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
935
937
939
941
944
945
946
950
EPA Corn
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
1015
Date
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
4/4/2005
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/4/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/7/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/7/2005
4/9/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/9/2005
lation Vehic
07/26/2004
8/02/2004
08/07/2004
08/14/2004
08/1 8/2004
08/25/2004
09/08/2004
09/14/2004
09/24/2004
09/27/2004
09/29/2004
10/01/2004
01/22/2005
01/26/2005
01/31/2005
02/05/2005
02/11/2005
02/14/2005
02/22/2005
03/03/2005
03/08/2005
03/14/2005
03/22/2005
03/31/2005
Cond
Run
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
Y s
e
PEMS Testing Summary
Cond
Rep
PEMS
on dyne
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
PEMS
on
dyne
Rep
Dway
Dyne Summary
Dyne
Test
84752
84751
84765
84758
84760
84759
84753
84772
84768
84771
84766
84775
84773
84767
84770
84774
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
Dyne
Rep
Pagel
General Vehic
Make
Ford
Ford
Chev
Chevy
Ford
Ford
Dodge
Dodge
Ford
Chev
Dodge
Chevrolet
Toyota
Nissan
Ford
Dodge
Chevy
Plymouth
Chevy
Chrysler
Jeep
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Model
F 100 Ranger
Escort
Impala
Beauville 10
Escape
Focus
Grand Caravan
Caravan SE
F-150XL
Astro Van
Grand Caravan Sport
Suburban
Forerunner
Frontier
F-250
Caravan
Astrovan
Voyager
Blazer 4x4
Voyager
Cherokee
Club Wagon E1 50
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
e Info (ERG)
Model
Year
1978
1998
1985
1979
2005
2005
2003
1992
1995
1994
2000
1997
1998
1998
1995
1995
1992
1992
1993
2002
1996
1989
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
Color
Green
Black
Green
Silver/Blue
Gray
Gray
Silver
Burgundy
Blue
Maroon
Red
Red
White
Green
Grey
Burgundy
Blue
Black
Green
White
Green
Burgundy
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Red
Mo of Doors
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
2
4
4
4
4
2
2
3
3
4
2
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Fuel
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Oil
Collected
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Smoke
Observ
(N/L/M/H)
H
N
H
M
N
N
N
N
N
L
N
N
N
N
L
L
MIL during
test (Y/N)
MILL Note (If MILL
during test=Y)
Comments
Flow meter K04-SE03; mpg 3
Engine oil clean; semtech CO
Oil dirty
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Flowmeter I04-SE08; mpg 21
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil clean; flowmeter I04-SE03
Oil clean; flowmeter H04-SEO
Oil dirty; flow H04-SE08; mpg
Oil medium; flowmeter K04SE
Oil clean; flow meter H04-SEC
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil medium; flowmeter K04SE
Oil clean; flow H04-SE08; mp
Oil medium; flowmeter I04-SE
Oil clean; flow K04-SE03; mp
Oil dirty; flowmeter I04-SE03;
Oil medium; flow K04-SE03; n
Oil clean; flowmeter I04-SE03
Oil dirty; flowH04-SE02; mpg
Oil clean; flowmeter I04-SE03
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
Study Corre ation Vehicle
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
Off
On
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
"Not RoY' monitors
None
None
EGR/2nd Air/Heated Catalyst
Heated Catalst/2nd Air
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
N/A
N/A
N/A
None
None
1138, P04f
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Pending
Codes
None
None
N/A
N/A
N/A
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0301
None
None
None
None
None
1456, P045
None
Comments
"Not Rdy" me
Mote: Down c
N/A -1990v
3
Vehicle on M
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
57,052
53,493
111,131
63,377
75,364
102,654
102,281
68,213
92,692
48,823.50
131,484
216,571
26,606
161,025
1 1 1 ,475
50,388
102,916
81,537
131,876
! 81,289
73,238
51,533
45,445
38,137
138,629
74,621
138,899
131,386
74,158
116,807
70,497
48,082
90,062
100,758
19,366
98,852
185,061
76,476
79,576
209,974
77,944
25,279
99,428
21,015
12,463
70,732
39,497.60
89,219
70,494
Odo units
(mi/km)
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Car
Truck
Van
SUV
SUV
Car
Truck
SUV
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
SUV
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Van
Van
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Van
SUV
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Mfr Date
May-01
Feb-79
3/31/1994
Sep-98
Mar-01
Feb-95
Jul-79
Jun-00
Dec-89
Aug-01
Oct-95
Aug-91
Jul-00
Apr-89
Dec-95
May-02
Jan-95
Jun-88
Apr-98
Apr-90
May-99
Nov-00
Sep-97
May-02
Nov-86
Nov-95
Jan-95
Dec-93
Sep-95
Jun-89
Mar-89
Feb-97
Feb-95
Sep-02
Aug-68
Mar-90
Jan-99
May-97
Mav-89
Nov-99
Mar-03
Jul-97
Oct-03
Nov-02
Nov-98
Feb-00
Feb-91
Total
GVWR
3601
6300
6400
5510
7200
3457
6900
3948
4057
6750
3440
3165
4028
4870
3681
3660
5300
4114
4900
3414
4535
3284
4565
5420
4400
3090
5040
5445
4300
3605
5480
5380
4850
4600
5442
3440
3915
3495
4035
4684
3992
2570
5300
4490
3530
4468
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
LbMsanu
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
kg
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
FWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
FWD
RWD
'' Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
Trans Type
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Manual
Manual
Auto
Auto
Auto
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto
Manual
Manual
Auto
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto
Manual
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Trans
Details
4
5
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
Unk
5
3 W/OD
5
5
Unk
5
3
5
3
4
4
3
3
4
3
4
4
Unk
3
Unk
Unk
Unk
Comments
Mfr Date - 4/21/94 c
Mfr Date, Total GW
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
ISO9141 A
SAE PWM
SAE-PWK
ISO 9141
SAE VPW
ISO-9141-
ISO-9141-
SAEJ185I
SAE VPW
ISO 9141
ISO 914
ISO 9141
ISO 9141-
SAEPVW
ISO9141-2
SAE-J185(
SAE 1850
SAE 1850-
SAE1850
SAE1850 1
SAE1850'
SAE1850
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
"Not RoY' monitors
None
None
None
Evap System
None
None
None
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Catalyst
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Evap system, Heated Catalyst,
N/A
Heated Catlyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catlyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catlyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catlyst, 2nd Air
Evap system, Heated Catalyst,
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Catalyst
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
None
P0400, P1
None
None
None
N/A
None
N/A
N/A
None
N/A
N/A
None
P0174
None
None
None
None
None
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
Comments
P0450, P1105
None
None
None
N/A
None
N/A
N/A
None
N/A
None
P0174
None
None
None
None
None
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
53,419
120,272
114,929
62,760
119,192
91,037
24,581
169,034
87,562
114,751
214,123
171,701
90,008
146,463
74,265
149,656
184,842
102,067
112,247
172,169
86,262
40,718
163,230
108,545
124,047
178,221
160,610
55,515
185,568
104,199
85,423
72,225
172,401
48,457
128,164
74,497
71,187
129,123
198,045
93,660
66,812
135,076
129,019
170,424
91,307
261,823
26,740
170,009
Odo units
(mi/km)
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Car
SUV
SUV
SUV
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Truck
Car
SUV
Truck
Van
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Van
Van
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Van
Mfr Date
Sep-98
Apr-93
Oct-98
Nov-99
Jan-99
Feb-02
May-94
Jul-84
Apr-99
Sep-94
Aug-90
Jul-97
Mar-00
Dec-97
Jun-95
Jan-95
Apr-96
Feb-93
Sep-99
Nov-01
May-98
Feb-89
Nov-95
Jun-88
Mar-95
Aug-90
Mar-99
Apr-00
Dec-98
Aug-92
Nov-99
Dec-96
Oct-97
Apr-98
Aug-93
Jun-96
Dec-99
Dec-89
Oct-01
Mar-90
Feb-88
Sep-89
Nov-01
Feb-93
Total
GVWR
3274
5280
4700
3948
4684
4150
2850
4550
5300
6400
3545
4333
3440
6050
4079
4400
4449
5340
6200
5350
4459
4245
4309
5280
3530
5360
5410
3495
4900
4180
3650
5427
4468
3630
6300
4598
3375
4450
3815
4309
4900
3485
5040
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
FWD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD, On-demand
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
Trans Type
Manual
Auto
Manual
Trans
Details
5
4
5
3
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
5
5
3
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
Auto W/OD
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Comments
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
SAE1850
ISO-9141-
ISO9141
ISO 9141
SAE PWM
ISO 9141
SAEPVW
SAE PWM
SAE PWM
ISO 9141
SAE VPW
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
SAE-1850
SAE-J185'
SAE-PWM
SAE-J185
ISO9141
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
"Not RoY' monitors
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air Syster
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Evap system, EGR, Catalyst, C
2nd Air, Heated Catalyst
2nd Air System, Heater Catalys
Evap system, EGR, Catalyst, H
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air Syster
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air Suppo
2nd Air System, Heated Catalys
Evap system, EGR, Heated cat
2nd Air System, Heated Catalys
Evap system, 2nd Air System, 1
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
EGR, 2nd Air System, Heated (
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air Svster
None
None
None
Evap system, EGR, Catalyst
Confirmed
Codes
None
P1456
P0133
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0141, PO
P0700
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0171
P0134
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0442 (EV
None
None
None
None
None
Comments
AP)
N/A, 1993
N/A-1983
N/A- 1994
1986
No OBD II 1£
No OBD# 1£
No OBDII 19
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
168,970
76,170
61,032
74,728
56,183
127,045
20,651
143,271
165,084
99,431
52,245
74,695
205,819
139,853
117,601
92,918
236,782
132,686
110,403
82,858
135,033
129,416
148,857
140,402
47,772
170,118
172,311
75,802
235,545
70,613
7,556
142,997
283,222
60,051
116,783
103,889
147,282
303,803
30,297.10
88,692
82,496.30
98,654
102,212
99,209
126,725
160,023
222,707
188,049
179,840
153,979
125,218
171,169
Odo units
(mi/km)
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Van
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
SUV
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Van
Truck
Car
Car
Van
Car
Truck
Van
Car
Truck
Van
Truck
Car
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Truck
Mfr Date
Sep-99
Apr-00
Nov-94
Jul-88
Jul-00
Sep-93
Jan-02
Aug-82
Aug-96
Oct-93
Feb-01
Jul-98
Jun-88
Oct-95
Oct-86
Oct-98
Apr-88
Aug-93
Oct-95
Oct-97
Mar-95
Nov-96
Feb-96
Apr-02
Feb-00
Apr-00
Jun-84
Feb-00
Jul-77
Oct-00
Nov-02
Mar-99
Oct-92
Apr-01
Dec-93
Oct-89
Feb-91
Sep-85
Oct-85
Jan-83
Apr-89
Mar-98
Apr-99
May-94
May-96
Aug-86
Not listed
Jun-84
Jan-87
Mar-92
Oct-89
Total
GVWR
5565
3990
5600
3940
4035
3318
4288
3855
4180
3825
3620
2432
3090
4421
3631
5120
2011
3825
4707
2223
4837
4075
3503
3330
4180
3515
6100
4555
2577
4950
2943
4454
5600
4600
3415
4294
6100
4780
4498
6300
5480
6000
2458
6200
3660
Not listed
Jnreadablf
5475
4167
5450
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
kg
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD, Full-time 4V
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
Trans Type
Trans
Details
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
5
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD 1
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
4
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto
6
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
5
Comments
G2HX5404JW27124
Mfr Date - No label
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
SAE-PWK
ISO9141
SAE VPW
SAE VPW
SAE VPW
SAE PWM
ISO9141
ISO9141
SAE PWM
SAE PWM
ISO9141
N/A
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
No
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
"Not RoY' monitors
EGR
None
None
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
P0133
None
None
None
None
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Comments
No OBD I
No OBD I
No OBD II 1£
Vehicle on I
No OBD II 19
No OBD II 1£
No OBD I
No OBD I
No OBD I
Mo OBDII 1
"Service eng
N/A
M/A- Light o
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
72,460
169,010
128,006
?
100,274
127,686
135,757
1 ,200.40
140,183
18,148
181,867
87,064
85,284
63,817
33,594
37,848
133,718
177,088
176,696
113,379
118,527
173,075
190,259
149,987
70,129
109,738
116,971
184,415
174,031
178,212
166,820
104,323
130,898
159,311
r 227,290
132,325
269,003
1,870
58,652
58,429
137,590.30
169,741
36,269
128,599
188,068
Odo units
(mi/km)
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Truck
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Mfr Date
Sep-01
Mar-94
Nov-72
Oct-84
Jul-91
Feb-00
Mav-97
Oct-91
Feb-04
May-89
Jan-93
Dec-99
Oct-90
Oct-86
Jun-86
Nov-87
Apr-92
Feb-89
Nov-92
Dec-97
Unknown
Mar-87
May-98
May-97
Mar-94
Jun-87
Dec-82
Jun-89
Jun-87
Nov-91
Feb-97
Feb-01
Oct-89
Not availabl
Jun-89
Aug-89
Jnreadable
Nov-99
Unreadable
Apr-79
Oct-93
Feb-86
Oct-88
Dec-94
Total
GVWR
4684
2582
4900
5320
3466
3330
4471
3680
2586
3315
3318
2430
3029
4595
6100
4297
3819
3420
3461
2290
Unknown
3470
4273
2427
3494
4480
4030
4795
3165
4348
5161
2124
4047
N/A
4165
3800
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Jnreadable
3549
Unreadabl
5108
6100
5375
4466
2952
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD, On-demanc
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
Trans Type
Trans
Details
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manuarl
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manuarl 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manuarl
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manuarl
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
5
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Comments
Mfr Date & GVWR -
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
ISO9141
VPW
ISO9141
ISO-9141
ISO9141
ISO9141
ISO9141
ISO9141
ISO9141
ISO9141
SAE-VPW
SAE PWM
SAE1850
SAEVP
ISO9141
ISO 9141
ISO9141
ISO9141
PWM
SAE VPW
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
SAE PWM
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
"Not RoY' monitors
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
None
None
None
None
None
Heat Catalyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
None
None
None
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0105 ma
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Comments
No OBD I
No OBD 19
Mo OBD 111
No OBD II 1
No OBD II 1£
No OBD II 1£
No OBD II 1£
No OBD II
P01 05 manifold
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
No OBD II
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
104,268
130,255
42,913
111,018
104,699
171,362
75,775
8975
299,695
85,907.40
152,029
184,963
92,817
59,404
146,571
127,406
92,673
115,362
49,723
75,574
101,517
76,611
40,263
81,571
121,435
115,367
24,907
158,762
124,721
80,740
154,236
202,788
95,297
144,664
127,647
37,914
108,173
11,647
60,272
77,796
94,823
6,248
72,455
87,701
Odo units
(mi/km)
Miles
Km
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Van
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Van
Truck
Van
Van
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Mfr Date
Dec-95
Sep-89
Oct-77
Feb-97
Jan-00
Nov-94
Mar-97
Mar-84
Apr-84
?-87
May-97
Aug-93
Apr-89
Unreadable
Mav-96
Mar-97
Jun-99
Jan-98
Oct-00
Unknown
Nov-93
Apr-99
Dec-01
Jul-72
Jun-93
Feb-97
Oct-02
Oct-90
May-96
Jul-89
Nov-96
Nov-89
Mar-00
Feb-89
Apr-98
Jan-01
Jan-96
Aug-96
Jul-99
Dec-97
Mar-97
Sep-03
Aug-89
Feb-88
Total
GVWR
5300
4700
1335
5357
3440
6100
3440
5490
4300
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Unreadable
6400
6250
4210
Jnreadable
4036
4075
6400
3330
3460
Unknown
3785
3983
2430
4720
6600
6000
2430
5040
4034
3315
3413
3880
3990
3696
4180
5560
4520
4273
4108
2125
4360
3370
6005
5361
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
RWD
On-demand 4WD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
Trans Type
Trans
Details
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Manual
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
5
5
Comments
Mfr Dates Total G\,
Odometer Reading
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
SAE VPW
SAE VPW
SAE VPW
ISO 9141
SAE PWM
9141
ISO 9141
VPW
SAEPWM
KW2000
SAE PWM
VPW
SAE VPW
SAE PWM
SAE VPW
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
SAE VPW
ISO 9141
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
On
Off
On
"Not RoY' monitors
EGR, 2nd Air, Heated Catalyst
Heat Catalyst, 2nd Air
EGR, Heat Catalyst, 2nd Air
Evap System, Heated Catalyst,
EGR, Heated Cat, 2nd Air
Heat Catalyst, 2nd Air
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
2nd Air
Evap System, Heated Catalyst,
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
None
None
Heat Catalyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catalyst
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Evap System, Heated Catalyst,
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Evap System, Heat Catalyst
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P1870trar
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0130, P4
None
P0133
P0341 can
P0172, P1
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Comments
P1 870 transmission
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P1491
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
225,160
8,412
57,229
63,143
75,475
128,220
11,662
6,337
106,185
131,762
178,757
133,428
98,555
61,498
220,817
22,357
Unable to read
107,408
61,399
147,558
73,824
84,899
120,904
146,953
57,813
91 ,846
288,775
80,342
185,872
69,357
235,460
81 ,768
88,207
170,219
70,386
118,171
117,932
Odo units
(mi/km)
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Truck
Car
Van
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Mfr Date
Mar-87
Aug-03
Aug-96
Mar-01
Oct-98
Jul-94
Jul-03
Feb-04
May-95
May-00
Feb-87
Jan-97
Nov-95
Jun-89
Apr-93
Nov-02
Jul-86
Aug-99
Oct-00
Nov-85
Unreadable
Dec-91
Jun-97
Sep-94
Apr-01
May-98
Nov-95
Dec-01
?
No sticker
Mar-90
Feb-96
Sep-93
Oct-96
Apr-95
Dec-88
Jan-00
Total
GVWR
4400
3701
3890
3981
5410
4310
4740
2730
3505
5250
3528
4489
4079
6250
3301
4123
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Unable to read
3375
4275
4950
Unreadabl
3415
3892
3481
4452
4687
3505
4295
4995
No sticker
5850
4340
4310
3354
4635
4915
5565
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD, On-demanc
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Trans Type
Manual
Trans
Details
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
4
5
Auto w/o OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD I
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Comments
VIN - Blank
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
SAE PWM
SAE VPW
SAE VPW
SAE VPW
VPW
ISO 9141
ISO 9141
3 1, noV1.
oil added.
SAE VPW
6. ISO 9141
6, ISO 9141
et ISO 9141
g. ISO 9141
8 mpg.
fuel mileage.
an ISO 9141
n 16.7 mpg.
ISO 9141
SAE PWM
VPW
5, ISO 9141
;, SAE VPW
-S VPW
SAE VPW
12 VPW
3 ISO 9141
0! ISO 9141
i, ISO 9141
2 4.
n,| ISO 9141
i.805.
pd SAE VPW
lolSAEVPW
age 17.365.
n, SAE VPW
ISO 9141
9 ISO 9141
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
n; 27.6 mpg. Duplicate test see 568A
licate test see 568 above.
ipg; oil dirty.
SAE VPW
N
Off
"Not Rdy" monitors
Evap Svstem, Heated Catalvst,
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air, O2 Si
EGR, Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
None
Heated Catalyst, 2nd Air
Evap System, EGR, Ox Sensor
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
elow.
None
Confirmed
Codes
None
P1621
None
None
None
None
P041 1 , P1
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0304
P0320, PO
P1456
None
None
None
None
P0138
P0731
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
06
None
None
None
None
None
None
Comments
No OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD II
Pending Cot
Confirmed C
No OBD II
No OBD II
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
100,945
24,712
127,776
75,714
164,867
30,880
169,526
49,549
77,793
258,730
38,308
106,984
128,817
90,219
74,582
82,918
168,860
62,342
220,013
107,975
96,428
123,567
85,178
29,493
XX5778
79,917
140,462
178,387
79,171
58,079
11,323
95,983
118,202
137,044
179,113
84,167
162,618
51,713
107,039
93,661
44,243
51,756
109,284
97,507
131,858
124,968
98,556
Odo units
(mi/km)
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
Miles
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Van
Car
Van
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Van
Car
Truck
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
SUV
Car
SUV
SUV
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Mfr Date
Sep-94
Aug-88
Jun-94
Oct-97
Mar-96
Oct-01
Mar-96
Feb-90
Sep-96
May-90
Jul-99
Feb-95
Oct-75
May-99
Oct-99
Mav-97
May-98
Jul-00
1990
May-95
Feb-97
Jun-89
Aug-99
Feb-02
1979
Apr-99
Oct-95
Nov-95
1998
Aug-96
Mar-03
Jun-99
Jan-99
Apr-98
Sep-94
Apr-00
Mar-95
Aug-00
Jul-97
Dec-89
Apr-01
Jan-01
Aug-90
Mar-97
Jul-94
Jul-94
Mar-95
Feb-99
Total
GVWR
5417
6250
5438
3856
4150
7000
3510
6050
3915
4167
3616
3457
7500
4535
5565
3915
5350
4035
Unknown
3505
5380
3605
5100
4684
6900
3983
3440
3090
3890
4453
6400
3330
4900
5300
3990
5280
3992
4057
3326
3990
5547
4360
4310
4310
4900
3403
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Trans Type
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto W/OD
Trans
Details
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Manual
Auto w/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD
5
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Comments
Odometer -109,28.
Odometer -nothing
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protoco
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
i;11.194mpg
^ SAE VPWI N
33 SAE VPW N
3 PWM N
e21.7 |
nileage: 10.051
33 9141
3 ISO 9141
g VPW
g 2000 KW
sage: 10.369
ge: 21.617
ge 7.781
g 18.13
9.97
N
N
N
N
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
"Not Rdy" monitors
None
None
None
None
None
None
3g 16.45. Gas gauge does not work but it is Hill, trip can goto 290 befo
g 8.922; filename MO 319EXL PRECOND2.xml
7.19
I0.8
23.890
03; mpg 11.5
nf SAE VPW
ir J04-SE06
-SE03
11.515
i; mpg 8.752
; mpg 20.9
J.083
g_ ISO 9141
3: 9141
y; mpg 7.5
9J 9141
mpg 18.1
5
N
Y
N
N
None
None
None
None
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
e it runs ou
None
None
None
; o I dirty; mpg 1 3.78. 2/1/05 - flow meter K04-SE03; oil dirty; mpg 7.85.
; mpg 1 6.2. PEMS only - was dyne testable but he did not want to leave it for both
gl SAE VPW N | None
ean; flow meter I04-SE08; mpg 17.716.
10.26
5; mpg 8.13
1 £ SAE PWM
IP SAE VPW
p< SAE PWM
g 8.514
3; mpg 15.40.
g 1 ISO-9141
3 25.642
£C ISO 9141
f 9141
1 SAE PWM
g SAE VPW
N
N
N
PEMS only
N
N
N
N
N
- too long for
Off
None
None
None
dyne.
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
pnoo/po;
None
None
None
None
P0171
None
None
P0300
None
None
None
None
Comments
No OBD I
None
None
No OBD II
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Pending Co
No OBD II
None
None
No OBD -co
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
Pending Co
None
No OBD II
Pending coc
Could not co
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
144,926
48,135
33,740
93,625
132,317
168,134
137,485
79,222
67,283
29,510
92,169
181,369
139,293
177,915
147,310
145,299
77,513
179,723
164,552
124,169
104,073
145,942
162,870
124,539
70,388
86,123
36,991
109,585
133,974
207,257
103,057
79,822
?
118,345
101,082
97,116
73,983
4,522
232,090
126,028
82,250
118,462
51,855
14,705
85,899
139,565
! 59,726
80,566
112,513
1 1 1 ,485
26,398
65,322
Odo units
(mi/km)
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Car
Truck
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Van
Van
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Van
Truck
Car
Van
Van
Car
Car
Van
Truck
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Truck
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Van
Truck
Car
Truck
SUV
Truck
Car
Truck
Truck
Truck
Van
SUV
Truck
Van
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Mfr Date
May-95
Nov-01
Apr-01
Jun-00
Nov-90
May-95
Mav-00
Oct-98
Mar-01
Nov-02
Apr-94
Apr-94
Aug-94
Feb-93
Apr-93
Nov-88
Jul-88
Aug-94
Sep-91
Feb-94
Jan-95
Dec-93
Apr-89
Dec-95
Aug-86
Jul-72
Jul-77
Jun-96
Jun-89
Jun-88
Sep-97
Mav-96
Apr-79
Jul-96
Jan-92
Aug-90
Sep-89
Oct-03
Mar-87
Nov-83
May-97
Nov-95
Sep-03
Sep-94
Jun-94
Jan-01
Aug-94
Sep-97
Jun-96
May-02
2000
Total
GVWR
4669
6200
4470
6350
3455
4545
5250
5410
3981
4123
4407
4273
4899
4449
5140
4940
3940
5194
5260
5126
4079
4486
4870
6200
3660
4720
5369
5420
4165
3090
5300
3449
5108
5430
4460
4740
4140
5750
4400
5600
4680
4200
5660
5400
6800
5250
3680
4700
4703
4684
4635
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
RWD
RWD
Full-time 4WD - C<
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
Trans Type
Auto w/OD
Auto w/OD
Auto W/OD
Trans
Details
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto
Auto w/0 OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/0 OD
Auto
Auto w/0 OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto w/0 OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Manual 5
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
Auto w/OD
Manual
Manual
5
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD I
Auto w/0 OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Comments
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
21 .748
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
"Not Rdy" monitors
eter H04-SE08. PEMS only too long for dyne
npg 8.685
12.09
EN PWM
; mpg 9.050
7.52
O: 9141
n[ 9141
1 SAEVPW
N
N
N
N
Off
Off
Evap System/None
None
None
None
g 21 .92. License number different from folder (folder says 487 GPK).
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
None
None
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
1 0.76. Make - nothing listed. PEMS only - would not shift out of park when not running - coulc
5; mpg 9. 506.
gS 9141
mpg 16.17
r; mpg 17.34
ni SAE PWM
n[ 9141
15 SAEVPW
mpg 15.45
09.917
20.505
3 9141
y; VPW
npg 18.507
g SAEVPW
3; SAE-PWK
1 VPW
h 9141
)8 ISO 9141
ISO 9141
; mpg 28.33
9n -311
016.235. No
IB VPW
et| VPW
pg 13.11
g 9141
1 VPW
g VPW
n[ 9141
g VPW
mpg 15.71.
8; mpg 9.6
pi VPW
9.6
21 9141
etf PWM
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
1C reading
N
N
N
N
N
Y
yne test vc
N
N
N
el year- No year listed.
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
in road test s
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
ided- carwa
Off
Off
Off
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
reen upon returning from preco
None
None
None
None
None
None
steaming, safety issue. Oil lea
None
None
None
None
None
P1456
None
None
None
None
None
P0306
None
P0455
None
nd run.
None
None
None
None
None
P0101/PO"
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0700/P1 '
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P0401
None
None
None
Comments
None
None
Evap not co
None
None
None
Confirmed C
Pending Cod
None
None
None
Confirmed c
No OBD II
None
None
No OBD II
Confirmed cc
No OBD I
No OBD I
None
None
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
210,281
6,060
17,149
187,394
107,196
124,688
88,587
19,453
108,830
34,223
200,807
205,876
213,485
80,570
188,044
87,208
47,470
101,901
46,702
130,513
93,417
48,696
84,644
76,197
88,892
114,219
49,320
48,200
69,002
161,263
88,505
64,146
103,059
138,981
131,660
46,354
61,160
134,775
28,700
75,537
67,091
49,767
106,227
?
155,898
109,036
122,222
18
41,466
Odo units
(mi/km)
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Car
Truck
Van
SUV
Truck
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Van
Van
Van
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Truck
SUV
Car
SUV
SUV
Car
Van
Truck
SUV
Van
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Van
Truck
SUV
Van
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Truck
Van
Van
Truck
Car
Mfr Date
Jun-93
Sep-88
Jul-92
Sep-00
Mar-92
Oct-81
Sep-02
Jul-98
Nov-01
Feb-93
Dec-91
May-98
Sep-90
Nov-94
Oct-00
Nov-96
Jul-96
Jun-94
Aug-94
Jun-92
Apr-92
Dec-97
Sep-99
Jul-92
Aug-02
Jul-98
Jun-96
Mav-95
Aug-99
Jul-98
Sep-94
Oct-94
Sep-87
Apr-01
Nov-01
Mar-92
Feb-02
Mar-01
Jun-00
Dec-97
Feb-01
Feb-86
Not listed
Sep-03
Apr-95
Sep-97
Aug-01
Jan-94
Total
GVWR
4405
5450
5400
6500
3315
5013
6085
4020
4628
3897
5950
4940
5410
5478
4300
4684
3915
6100
5438
6400
3657
4165
7300
4130
5357
2222
6800
5350
2223
2182
3555
4472
5475
4950
5357
6250
6400
5600
4714
4570
4900
5550
Not listed
5000
4740
5410
5080
3825
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
FWD/RWD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
FWD
On-demand AWD
RWD/On-demand
On-demand AWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
RWD/On-demand
FWD
Trans Type
Auto w/OD
Auto w/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Trans
Details
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto w/OD
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD
Auto w/o OD
Comments
Mo door jamb sticke
Drive Type - AWD <
Drive Type - 2Hi 4H
Odometer Reading
Odometer Reading
Odometer Reading
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
g 1 PWM
7.749
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
"Not Rdy" monitors
Confirmed
Codes
Pending
Codes
N
Off
None
None
None
odney & Marc. Needs to be run on PEMS after dyne 2/1 9 also pics ftiel & oil samples. No PEI
4-SE08. PEMS only too ong for dyne.
er#!04-SE03
4-SE08
mpg18
te| PWM
N
319.396. Dyne 3/11/05.
On
None
14.84. Round 2 driveaway only. Dyne test 3/17/05 mpg 25,045
VPW
Tl| VPW
E SAE VPW
16.44
23.627
3; ISO 9141
25. Driveaway
1 ; mpg 24.0
npg 15.70
22.216. (No 2
-S 9141
12111
pi VPW
1 J1850PWH
Have to fix rr
j3 9141
1| PWM
4-SE08
SE13
T£ PWM
1: PWM
:k PWM
2 9141
-SE08
1396
N
N
N
N
only.
5" flow me
N
N
N
ufflerwhen
N
N
N
N
Y
N
-SE03. Driveaway.
I ISO 9141 Y
Off
Off
Off
Off
ers available
Off
Off
Off
done with dy
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
On
None
None
None
None
)
None
None
None
ne & perns. Oil dirty; mpg 15.71
None
None
None
None
None
None
Catalyst
32.224. New tailpipe S muffler installed 2/28/05. Gas leak.
39 VPW
npg 17.398.
12.5
E0| ISO 9141
W04-SE06.
N
N
3; mpg 18. 719.
Off
Off
None
None
& driveaway vehicle only - too long for dyne!
1 9141-2
14.699.
g 13.785.
PWM
N
N
Off
Off
None
None
11 317 PFMS only Tnn nngfnrDynp
15407
P1537/P1538/P0301/I
'0146(3/2*
None
None
P0720
None
None
None
5; fin #H04-
None
None
None
None
Comments
None
None
No OBD I
Confirmed cc
None
None
0, P0700(2/21)
None
None
None
None
None
None
SE08.
None
None
None
None
P1450/P0302
None
1794/P05C
None
None
None
None
None
5
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
No OBD II
None
None
None
Confirmed C
None
None
None
None
No OBD I
No OBD I
None
None
None
None
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
126,843
203,058
63,903
104,721
39,452
74,419
126,807
146,235
197,078
24,583
94,342
30,315
74,703
287,798
78,736
212,969
122,875
199,269
86,697
166,354
131,298
166,799
81,364
56,622
92,185
44042
65,854
75,052
41,183
178,447
145,852
133,068
97,585
3 99,271
29,580
47,917
5,856
163,807
85,890
47,098
65,043
116,429
94,772
100,072
168,083
64,563
165,710
125,651
18,567
394
33,672
70,610
73,721
Odo units
(mi/km)
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Truck
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
Car
Truck
Van
Truck
Car
Car
Van
Truck
Car
Truck
Van
Van
Van
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Van
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Van
Car
SUV
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Van
Car
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Mfr Date
Dec-95
Nov-94
Sep-93
Aug-93
Mar-93
Nov-92
nable to Re;
Apr-97
Dec-92
Jun-93
Nov-95
May-02
Jul-95
Jul-07
Apr-95
Aug-95
Sep-94
No sticker
Jun-95
May-93
Oct-94
Jun-78
Aug-00
Jan-93
Mar-02
Jul-79
Dec-97
Jul-01
Feb-93
Dec-93
Sep-97
Jul-97
Jun-97
Feb-98
Jun-93
Feb-79
Nov-87
Oct-97
Mar-79
Sep-97
Feb-93
Jan-77
Nov-98
Aug-88
Mar-78
Mar-91
May-96
May-90
Aug-87
Feb-00
Apr-89
Feb-78
Total
GVWR
4700
4635
4200/1905
6200
4692
4777
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Unable to Read
5220
4440
3825
5300
5600
4600
4115
3808
2746
4740
No sticker
4400
5040
5040
5150
3370
4692
4528
5297
4035
7000
3513
3485
4687
5220
4550
5120
4313
Unable to
3485
2855
3926
5500
3203
3330
4122
4528
7200
5445
4458
5450
4800
8800
5080
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
ead
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
Trans Type
Manual
Auto w/OD
Auto w/OD
Auto w/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Trans
Details
5
Auto w/0 OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD |
Auto w/0 OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD
Auto w/OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/ OD |
Auto w/0 OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto W/OD
5
Auto w/0 OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/0 OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
Auto w/OD
Manual
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD |
Auto w/0 OD
Auto w/0 OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/0 OD
Comments
Odometer Reading
A/C?-?
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
q VPW
3; ISO 9141
20.09; mpgd
J16.067
; mpg 12.492
s J PWM
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
N
N
veaway 2
Y
22.5. PEMS only. No rad
06; mpg 39.23.
8; mpg 15.16.
er 9141
g VPW
npg 18.15
22.516
1( 9141
e safety issue
9141
3; ISO 9141
3; SAE-VPW
g 9141
1 9141
Tl| VPW
-> 9141
1! VPW
IB VPW
; mpg 19.869
91 ?
mpg 8.776. \
S precon.
r
3; mpg 12.05
14.201
8;l ISO 9141
; mpg 13.95
1746
N
N
N
s.
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
ery stop &
N
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
Off
Off
.767
On
"Not Rdy" monitors
None
None
None
ator - will overheat on dyne
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
Off
Off
go & turbo.
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
g 25.22. Speedometer not accurate. PEMS only, exhaust leaks.
8; mpq 9.69. Front left tire needs air in it.
g 17.09
;ter H04-SE02; mpg 21 .889. PEM after Dyne.
mpg 1 6.1 29. Linkage in steering column is worn out.
3; mpg 18.011
npg 17.897. Have to start with a screwdriver with the lights on.
ifiqrw
1 0.570. Do not set emergency brake!
18.72
8; mpg 12.63
).46
i. 30
; mpg 19.359
. Gas gauc
e does not w(
rk has $10 of gas in it. Only driv
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
P0133
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
P1491/PO:
None
None
None
None
None
e in circle [
Pending
Codes
None
None
P0420
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
. When re\
Comments
None
None
No OBD II
Confirmed C
No OBD II
No OBD II
None
None
Confirmed C
No OBD II
None
No OBD II
None
No OBD I
No OBD I
No OBD I
None
None
None
No OBD II
None
No OBD I
No OBD II
No OBD I
None
None
None
None
No OBD I
No OBD I
No OBD I
No OBD I
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
145,130
113,364
154,224
19,742
135,705
3 203,335
18,484
164,184
23,191
64,126
77,750
62,838
139,955
117,634
60743
16,601
31712
44,743
90,003
20,779
80,211
60,774
46,866
97,513
162,866
248,169
140,492
148,000
128,352
98,966
66,276
112,830
209,194
56,562
220,628
376,819
169,851
117,015
185,376
123,624
215,899
61,431
85,487
148,951
140,670
262,300
98,988
161,373
Odo units
(mi/km)
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
SUV
Van
Van
Truck
Truck
Van
Car
Car
Truck
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Van
Van
Van
SUV
SUV
Van
Van
Van
Van
Car
Van
Car
Car
Car
Car
SUV
SUV
Truck
Car
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Van
Van
Van
Truck
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Mfr Date
Dec-96
Jun-99
Aug-91
No sticker
Apr-92
Oct-95
Nov-77
Feb-89
May-87
Jul-99
Sep-01
Jan-89
No sticker
Jun-96
Nov-01
Feb-04
Mav-02
Sep-02
Aug-00
Jul-02
Nov-00
Mar-02
Dec-02
Feb-90
May-89
Sep-86
Jun-95
Mar-89
Jan-86
May-94
Jul-00
Nov-86
No sticker
Dec-94
Oct-87
Jul-77
Sep-89
:ould not ret
Mar-90
Not listed
Nov-88
Nov-87
Jun-82
Jul-90
Jun-88
May-89
Nov-88
Dec-88
Total
GVWR
7300
2432
5040
No sticker
4440
8550
2844
4047
5000
4180
5750
5566
No sticker
4820
5665
5959
5600
5665
5400
5400
5250
5500
5500
4045
4870
4230
3592
4060
3165
5360
5300
5930
No sticker
4200
5100
6400
4488
Cound not
4416
Not listed
5600
4930
6500
4119
5450
5350
3621
3682
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
read
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
Trans Type
Trans
Details
Auto w/OD I
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
Auto w/OD
Manual
5
4
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
5
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Comments
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
g 26.085
3; mpg 22.38
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
"Not Rdy" monitors
Confirmed
Codes
Pending
Codes
; mpg 1 3.295. Passenger window roll down when opening door. Cold start pump gas first othf
M81 . Needs to be PEMed when done on dyne.
; mpg 8.028. Fuel collected - sheet says no and envelope says yes. Do not roll windows dowr
197
20.308
; 33.98 mpg
- participant needs vehic
e.
; 1 1 .85 mpg. New muffler and tail pipe last Monday. Fuel Collected? Sheet says yes and envf
14.234. PEMSonlvtoo ong for dyne. Did driveawav too
g 12.757
63 mpg
15.261. Need to take pictures of vehic e. Needs to be PEMED after Dyne. Needs to betaken
8; 1 3.70 mpg. Fuel gauge does not work only fuel tank (front) works.
g 19.376
; 19 mpg
; mpg 12.227
8; mpg 16.75
3.553
3; mpg 26.146. Vehicle license different from envelope.
; mpg 1 1 .37
43 .TaketoBSH.
15 911
r.181
15.874
7.689
IB. 923. Rebu
15.169
12.613
16.8
1 VPW
g18.114
20.7
23.698
g11.710
SE08, mpg 21
18.270
g] 9141-2
13.352
ttransmiss
Y
.358. Warn
N
-SE03;mpg20.16
mpg 11.18
g 18.692. Needs oil.
18.567. Brake light stays
16.113
16.117
. 1 ISO9141
' ISO9141
; r SAE-PWM
8; mpg 9. 174
.113
N
N
N
on 2 months
On
ng: leaking fij
Off
on. Gas gau
Off
ago. Timothy Tankard picked up
None
el out of carburator. PEMS only
None
e does not work but does have
None
None
None
pg 21 .1 70. Off dyne @ 1 0:30 am - precond & then ... 3:45 driveaway.
23.600 |
8.339. Oil below add line. Semtech C03SG02. PEMS only too wide for
1990 F15(
None
air cooled e
None
gas in it. Dr
None
None
None
Dyne.
that we te;
None
ngme
None
vers door ;
None
None
None
Comments
None
No OBD II
None
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
None
None
No OBD II
No OBD II
None
None
None
None
No OBD II
None
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
None
No OBD II
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
No OBD II
No OBD II
None
None
None
None
No OBD II
No OBD II
None
None
None
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
87,893
109,922
209,384
45,370
139,424
327,203
4,994
97,627
187,050
146,845
574,687
30,666
61,800
94,729
72,987
62,939
138,226
220,953
98,784
97,153
94,539
90,855
58,223
73,439
169,285
87,003
86,086
94,171
38,815
31,245
27,420
153,390
10,184
28,857
68,802
32,325
45,542
81,747
220,309
122,979
140,662
85,441
85,092
182,333
71,459
64,627
19,631
62,848
46,861
36,201
60,900
64,075
107,890
133,958
33,238
Odo units
(mi/km)
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
A/C?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Van
SUV
Truck
Car
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Truck
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
SUV
Car
Truck
Truck
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Van
SUV
Van
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Car
Truck
Car
Truck
Car
Truck
Car
Car
Car
Van
SUV
Car
SUV
Car
Car
Car
Car
Van
Mfr Date
Oct-82
Oct-89
Aug-88
Aug-79
Nov-90
No sticker
Aug-89
Oct-82
Oct-88
Not listed
slot readable
No sticker
Nov-85
Mar-90
Sep-87
Nov-89
nable to ret
Apr-83
May-88
Mar-88
Dec-91
nable to ret
Jun-78
Mar-87
Oct-86
No sticker
Jul-73
Jun-90
Jun-80
Sep-88
Unknown c£
Oct-02
Jan-89
Not legible
Nov-93
Apr-79
Unknown
Jun-88
Apr-99
Feb-89
Oct-89
Not listed
Sep-90
Dec-89
Sep-81
Nov-89
Jul-00
Nov-00
Feb-02
Aug-76
Jun-84
Aug-89
Jan-90
Jul-86
Total
GVWR
2980
4057
3959
4568
4429
No sticker
6050
4250
5386
6400
6000
No sticker
4900
4420
6250
4122
Unable to
5200
6250
4030
5100
Unable to
6150
5080
4705
No sticker
5570
6250
4405
6600
4724
5600
4080
Not legible
3331
3745
1340
4460
3472
5600
4453
Not listed
3481
4034
4300
4880
4175
4180
4376
5694
3994
4382
3165
6600
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
ead
ead
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
RWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
RWD
Trans Type
Manual
Trans
Details
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
Manual
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
4
5
5
5
3
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual 5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Manual
Manual
Manual
Auto
Auto w/o OD
Manual
5
4
5
5
4
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD
Auto W/OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Comments
VIN - chassis numb
-------
Page 2
Pre-Testing OBDII Check (ERG)
OBD
Comm
Protocol
Vehicle on
MIL on?
(Y/N)
Download
MIL status
(On/Off)
"Not Rdy" monitors
1 .8 (wrong) (truck has major exhaust problems).
3E PWM
g 1.091
8; CAN
4 CAN
g VPW
;mpg 16.224
3; mpg 15.88
14.296
0 ISO9141
D8 SAE-VPW
g 9141
0 ISO9141
g 13.64
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
03; mpg 18.836
g 1 6.238. PEMS only.
mpg 16.83. PEMS only.
npg 17. 271. PEMS only.
; r] SAE-VPW
1J 9141
N
N
; mpg 28.6. PEMS only.
Off
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
Off
8.6 F seems
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
EGR
None
None
way too high - insufficient time t
Confirmed
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
30440/P1<
None
None
do anothe
Pending
Codes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
48
None
None
r run - will
Comments
None
No OBD II
No OBD II
No OBD II
None
None
None
No OBD II
None
No OBD II
Page 3
General Vehicle Info (ERG)
Odometer Reading
58,882
55,293
75,915
84,006
10,511
6,693
47,640
143,971
147,334
133,309
93,154
137,614
115,751
107,607
52,565
136,808
195,068
235,513
64,970
25,981
56,429
33,795
13139
13158
113170
113189
1 1 3208
13239
XXX
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
Odo units
(mi/km)
mi
mi
mi
mi
mi
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
A/C?
(Y/N)
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
VIN
Veh Type
Truck
Car
Car
Van
SUV
SUV
Van
Van
Truck
Van
Van
SUV
SUV
Truck
Truck
Van
Van
Van
Truck
Van
SUV
Van
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Ca
Mfr Date
Nov-77
Jan-98
Unk- DOOM
Jul-79
Jan-04
Jul-04
Feb-03
Jul-92
Feb-95
Jun-94
May-00
Oct-96
Oct-97
Oct-97
Apr-95
Mar-95
Nov-91
Dec-91
Apr-93
Apr-02
Jul-96
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Jun-88
Total
GVWR
4900
3485
Unk
6000
4380
3800
5550
5200
5450
5950
5410
7300
5250
5200
6600
5040
5950
5200
4700
5400
4600
6600
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
4615
GVWR
Units
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Lbs
Drive Type
RWD
FWD
RWD
RWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
On-demand 4WD
On-demand 4WD
On-demand 4WD
RWD
FWD
RWD
FWD
Full-time 4WD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
FWD
Trans Type
Trans
Details
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD
Manual
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto w/OD
5
Auto w/o OD
Auto w/o OD
Auto W/OD |
Auto w/o OD
Manual
Auto w/o OD
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
5
Comments
A/C? - OEM AC ren
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
4
6
11 8
6
8
4
8
4
4
4
4
6
6
4
4
6
6
6
4
6
6
6
8
4
6
4
8
6
6
6
6
4
8
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
(VI 6
8
4
8
Disp
2.2
5.2
3.5
5.3
351
2
2.5
5.4
1590
91
2.5
3
2.2
2
4.3
3.8
4
2.2
3.5
3.8
3.3
1.9
3.3
2.5
2.3
5
3
3.3
4.3
4.3
289
5
2.2
2
2.2
3
3.1
3.5
3.5
3.1
4.6
4.9
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
cm3
CID
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
2001
1994
1999
2001
1995
1979
2000
1990
1996
1991
2001
1989
1996
2002
1995
1988
1998
1990
1999
1998
2002
1986
1996
1995
1995
1989
Not listed
2001
1997
1995
2003
1990
1999
1997
1989
1999
2003
1998
2004
1998
1999
1991
OBD Type
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBD I
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBD I
No OBD
OBD II
OBDII
OBD I
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBD I
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA, California, Canada
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
Not listed
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
LEV
NLEV
None
TLEV
LEVII LEV
N/A
TLEV
NLEV
1996
NLEV
ULEVLD1
PCV
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
EGR
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Evap
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Ox
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Engine Family #
1GMXV02.4022
RCR5.988GAEA
1GMXT05.3182
1.9SEF1
5.8M/6.8"B" (1x128)
1TKXV02.515MA
KCR3.OT5FBLG
TGM2.2V86KEK
2HNXV02.0VBP
S3G4.329GFGJ
J2G3.8V8XEBO
WCRXT04.02BO
L1G2.2V5JFG2
XCRXV0215V20
WGMXV03.8047
2NSXT03.3C5A
TGM1.9V8GKEK
SCR3.328GFEA
SCR2.578GAEA
K2G2.3V8XEWO
N/A, no sticker
3GMXT04.3187
N/A
5.0L-OHM
VHN22VJGKFK
KHN20V2F4F6
2V-Group:3FMXV03
4HNXT03.51AT
WGMXV03.1041
I.6LXFMXR0105BAE
Evaporative Family #
1GMXR0124919
RCR1065AYPOA
1GMXE011920
1TKXL0125PMC
KCRTC
TGM1046AYMAA
2HNXR0099AAH
S3G1089AYMON
JBO-2D
WCRXE01O1GCS
LAO-1E
XCRXR0101G1D
WGMXE0086903
2NSXR0120RCA
TGM1035AYPAA
SCR1095AYMOA
SCR1058AYMON,SC
KAO-2G
N/A, no sticker
1TYXR0135AK1
3GMXR01 75922
N/A
LFM5.OV5HBG6
VHN1090AYMEA
89FB
3FMXR011SBAE
4HNXR0160AAB
3NSXR0130MAC
WGMXE0095904
XFMXV04.6VBE, XU7
MCD, M2G4.9V8X6A7, MBO-2B 4.9 Liter
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Unknown
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In
Carb
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
4
6
6
4
6
6
6
6
4
8
4
6
4
8
4
6
6
6
8
6
6
4
6
6
4
6
6
4
6
4
4
8
6
6
8
6
6
8
4
6
6
6
Disp
1.9
4
3.2
1.6
3
91
3
1.5
4
5.2
1.6
3
5
2
4.3
3.1
4
5.3
3.3
3.8
3.8
178
112.3
3.3
3.3
2.2
4
2.2
2.2
4.6
3.1
152.4
5.8
2.7
4.3
5
2.2
3.3
4
3
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
CID
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1999
1997
1984
1991
1995
1991
1997
2000
1995
1996
1993
2000
2002
1998
1989
1988
1991
1999
2000
1999
1993
1997
1997
1998
1993
1995
2000
2002
1987 EPA
1990
1991
1990
1993
OBD Type
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBD II
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
Tierl
NLEV
PCV
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Unk
Unk
Unk
Y
Unk
Unk
Unk
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
TAC
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
N
Unk
Unk
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
N
Unk
Unk
Y
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Unk
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Evap
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
N
Y
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Engine Family #
XGMXV01.9001
PFM4.0T5FYYX
XSZXT03.52EK
VNS1.6VJGKEK
XFMXT03.02BB
EHN1.SU3FCFO
XTYXV03.0BBA
LHN1.5V5F1F2
SCR4.028GFEA
MCR5.9TSHGF9
VTY1.8UJGFFK
YNSXV03.0A6A
SFM1045AYMOA
TGM4.31PGFEK
P1G3.4V8XGZS
LOL-YFMXE0120BAI
2GMYT05.3181
WCRXT03.32BP
K2G3.8U8XEB1
JFM3.8U5HHF3
YVUXV 2.93 BUS
MTK1.8V3FFD7
XCRXT03.328P
YCRXT03.32BP
XTYXV02.2XBC
PCR4.0T5FGA5
YTYXV02.2XBA
VGM2.2V8GKEK
VFM4.6V8GKFL
WGMXV3.1041
PFM2.5V5F2F1
SFM5.888GBJA
YCRXV02.7VBO
2GMXT04.3187
HFM5.0V5HBFX
LHN22V5FNFO
MCR3.8V5FBH5
LAM4.0T5LND3
PCR3.0T5FFXI
Evaporative Family #
XGMXR0080902
XSZXT0095MEO
VNS107SAYMEA
84 FA
XTYXR0135AK1
90FD
SCR7058AYPON
MCRTE
VTY1047DYMAO
YNSXR0110RCC
TGM1089AYMEA
PBO-1K
YFMXT04.02F3
2GMXE0111911
WCRXE0101XAA
YVUXRO 133X48
E
XCRXE0101XAA
YCRXE0101XAA
XTYXE01 35AEO
PTAPR or PTASS
YTYXR0135AKI
VGM1095AYMEA
VFM1090AYMED
WGMXR0133918
Couldn't find
SFM1045AYMOA
YCRXR0101GBD
2GMXE0095904
FIEGRE05AIP
90FG
MCRVC
LT-4.0H-15
PTASC
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
6
4
6
6
4
4
4
4
6
4
4
6
4
6
V6
6
3 6
4
6
6
8
4
4
4
4
4
6
4
8
4
4
6
6
6
4
4
8
6
8
8
6
6
8
4
4
4
6
8
6
or 6
6
Disp
3.5
2.3
4.2
2.3
2.3
1.6
2
2.6
2.4
2.3
2
3.3
91 CID1.5
3.8
2.8
3
3.8
2.3
3
4
4.6
2.2
1.8
1.6
2.2
1.8
4.9
2.5
305
2.4
1.8
3.1
4.3
4.3
1.9
3.1
4.3
5
2.8
5.8
5
4.2
Unknown
5.7
2.4
2.5
2.2
3.8
5
3
3.8
4.9
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1999
2000
2000
1988
2001
1994
2002
EPA 1983
1997
1992
2001
1999
1988
1996
1986
1999
1988
1994
1996
1988
1995
1997
1996
2000
2000
2000
1984
2000
1977
2001
2003
1999
1993
2001
1994
1990
1991
1986
1986
83
1989
1998
Unknown
1994
1996
1986
1988
1985
1992
1994
1990
OBD Type
OBDII
OBD II
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBD II
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBD I
No OBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA, California
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
NLEV
M LEV, Cle
NLEV, Cle
NLEV
TLEV
NLEV
Tierl
NLEV
NLEV
LEV
NLEV
LEV
LEV
PCV
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Unk
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Unk
N
N
Y
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N - Disabli
N
N- Disable
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N - Disablf
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
Y
EGR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N - Disablf
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Evap
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
M - Remov
Y
N - Remov
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Unk
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Engine Family #
YHNXT03.5EA3
YHNXV02.3PF3
YFMXT04.22BF
JFM2.3T5FFG1
1HNXV02.32J1
RNS16VJGFEA
2KMXT02.0B05
DCR2.6V2BAP2
VW2.4VJGKEL
'.OL-YFMXV0.2.0VF:
VCRXT03.328P
JHN1.5V5FCF4
TGM3.8V8GKEK
G162.8V8XG2X
XFMXT03.02BB
J2G3.8V8XEBO
RFM2.3V8GAJA
TFM3.0VJGFEK
WCRXT04.02BO
SFM4.6V8GAEB
VTY2.2VJGKFK
TTY1 .8VJGFFK
YHNXV01 .6CA3
YTYXV02.2XBA
YT4XV01.8
EFM4.9TIHGG5
YFJXV02.5JEH
Unlisted
1HYXT02.4S3S
3TKXV01 .8CJA
XGMXV03.4041
P3G4.3T5TAA6
1GMXT04.3187
R4G1 .9VHGBEA
LIG3.1V8XG25
M3G4.3T5TAA3
non readable
FLG2812H1X1
DFM5.8T2AAF9
5.0L-9HM
WFMXT04.2BAA
N/A, no sticker
R3G5.785GAEB
TCR2.4VJGFEK
GFM2.5V5HCFS
JTK2.2V5FFG1
F4G3.8V8XEB3
NNS3.0V5FHAB
R1G3.8V8FEA
IFM4.9T5HGF7
Evaporative Family #
YHNXE0130AA3
YHNXR0130AAA
YFMXE0155BAE
8HM
1HNXR0130AAF
RNS1030BYMOA
2KMXR0160B05
DCRKB
VW143AYPEA
2.0LFMXROOBOBBE
XCRXE0101XAA
88FD
TGM1058AYMMA
6BO-1E
3.0LXFMXE0155FBE
JBO-2D
RFM1045AYMOA
TFM1115AYMEB
WCRXE0101GCS
SFM1045AYPOA
VT41095AYME1
TTY1041DYMAO
YHNXR0099AAD
YTYXR0135AKI
YT4XR011SAK1
E4AE-9C485-AKM
YFJXR01251CC
710Y2
1HYXR0175PES
3TKXR0120PMA
XGMXE0095904
PFO-3A
1GMXE0095904
R4G1035AYPOC
LBO-1 K
MFO-3B
non readable
S86-8
3DQ?
KFM5.0V5HBF4
WFMXE0160BAE
N/A, no sticker
R3G1085AYMOA
TCR1098A4PEO
JBO-2D
580-AA
F16-1
R1G1058AYMOJ
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
6
6
I 6
8
8
4
6
4
6
4
4
4
6
6
4
4
4
4
6
8
4
6
6
6
8
4
6
4
6
6
6
4
6
4
6
4
4
8
8
8
6
4
Disp
3
3.5
3.8
?
5
1.9
3.1
2.3
3.8
96.8
1.33
1.8
3
4.9
2.8
2.3
96.8 CiD
1.8
2.5
4.9
2
3
3.3
1.8
2.9
141 Cl
4.3
1.9
3.8
3
3
3.8
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
lnj
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Unk- No label
3
1.8
2
4.9
5
5
3.8
1.3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
2001
1994
1994
?
1984
1992
1997
1992
2005
1989
1993
1991
1987
1986
1987
1992
1989
1993
1997
1992
1987
1998
1997
1994
1987
1983
1989
1987
1992
1997
2001
1990
1991
UNK
1984
2000
1989
1979
1994
1986
1989
1994
OBD Type
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
UNK
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
Emiss
Cert
Details
ULEV
LEV
N/A
N/A
PCV
Y
N
N
Unk
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
TAC
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
EGR
Y
N
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Evap
Y
Y
Unk
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
N
Y
Unk
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Unk
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Engine Family #
2FMXV03.0VF3-2
RCR3.5VJGAEA
R1G3.8V8GFEA
?
ASF-525.0L-5FM
NFM1.9V5FCF3
VGM3.1V8GKEK
N2G2.3V8XRM9
5CRXT03.82NO
KTY16V2HFD8
Unknown
MVW1 .8V5FWD8
BUJJIASAWSF-323.1
4.9-6GM
JIG2.8V8XRZ8
N2G2.3V8XRM9
LNT1.6V5FFD1
PFM1.8V5FXF7
2.5WFMXE0115BBE
P1G4.9WBXGAO
HHN2.0V5FNF4
WNSXV03.0A6A
VCR3.828GFEK
RDS1 .8GAEA
HFM2.9T5FME6
DW141V5FSN4
K3G4.3T5XEBO
HFM1.9V5FFF1
N2G3.8V8JAW4
VFM3.0V8GKEK
1 FMXV03.0VF3
M2G3.8V8XEB3
Evaporative Family #
2FMXR0115BAE
RCR1095AYP01
R1G1058AYMOJ
?
FFM5.0V5HBF8
F2AE-9C485 HGS ?
VGM1095AYMEA
NAO-2A
5CRXR0177GHA
(unknown)
Unknown
HFM3.0V5FEGG
GFM4.9T1HGG7
JBO-1K
NAO-2A
EV-E
BWOGF
WFMXV02.5AA
PRO-IT 4.9
87FG
WNSXE0110MBA
VCR1098AYPEA
RDS1037BYMOG
E7AE-9C485-CCE
E2
KBO-3E
E7AE-9C485
NBO-2F
VFM1115AYMEP
1W7E-9C485-HFP
MBOP-2D
K02TUESL2 (model tag says), 663B, EXT P
E4G3.8V2NEYO
YKMXV01 .8A03
K1G2.0V5IGO
920S2E
RFM1045AYMOA
5.0L-6HM
K2G3.8V8XEB1
SFM1065BYMDA
483-40
YKMXR0100A03
KAO-1E
983-2
RFM5.888GBJ8-OC
GFM5.0V5HBF9
KBO-2D
SFM1 .3V8G1 EA
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Cart
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
/V 4
6
8
4
4
4
6
4
8
4
8
8
6
6
6
4
4
8
4
4
4
4
6
6
8
8
8
6
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
4
6
6
4
8
8
Disp
4
4.3
110 cu in
3.4
1.6
4.3
1.6
5
2.3
5.9
4.9
3.1
3.8
2.4
2.5
5.9
1.6
1.7
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.4
4.5
5.7
4.6
3.4
3
2
1.6
2
2.4
2.2
2.2
3.8
3
3
2.2
3
4
1.6
5
5
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
No Label
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1995
1990
1978
1997
2000
1995
1997
1984
1984
1997
1993
1989
1990
1996
No Label
1999
1998
2001
1992
1994
1999
2002
1973
1993
1997
2002
1991
1996
1996
1990
2000
1989
1999
2001
1996
1997
1999
1998
1997
2004
1990
1988
OBD Type
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBD II
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
NLEV
Tier 1 , LE\
NLEV
NLEV
light duty tr
N/A
Light duty
On Tier 2-
NA
PCV
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Unk
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
Unk
N
Unk
N
Y
N
EGR
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Evap
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Cat
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Unk
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Engine Family #
SCR4.028GFEA
L3G4.3T5XE
B/50
YHNXV01.6TA3
S3G4.385GAEA
VHN1.6JGKEK
E3G5.0V4NLAX
EW2.3V5FEL8
Unknown
VCR5.968GFEK
PFM4.9T5HGM9-OC
K1G3.1V8XGZ4
L2G3.8V8XEBL
TCR2.4VJGFEK
No Label
XCRXT05.95B2
WHNXV01.6CA3
1HNXV01.7YJD
NHN2.ZV5FEY4
R1G2.3V7GFEA
XGMXV03.4041
2GMXT03.4141
Unknown
P3G5.7T5TYA8
VFM4628GKEK
MCR3.0T5FBL8
TDS2.0VJGFEK
VNS1.6VJGKEK
LTY2.0V5FFFO
YNSXV02.4A3A
KCR2.5V5VBE7
WTYXV02.2XBA
1FMXR0230BBE
TTY3.0VJGFFK
VNS3.0VJGFEK
XTYXV02.2XBA
WFMXV03.0DAA
VCR4.028GFEK
4KMXV01.6102
L2G5.0V4NLA9
JFM5.0V5HBF3
Evaporative Family #
SCR1058AYPON
LBO-3E
L CAN-1
YHNXR0099AAD
S3G1085WYMOA
VHN106SAYMED
434-3A
E2
Unknown
VCR1073AYPBB
F3AE9C48S-J1AJ
KBO-1 K
LBO-2D
TCR1098AYPEO
No Label
XCRXE0133GDH
WHNXE0065AAD
1HNXR0099AAH
92FG
R1G1046AYMOG
XGMYR0124912
2GMXR0212923
Unknown
PPO-3C
VFM1160AYMED
MCRTH
TDS1130AYMEL
VNS1075AYMEA
EV-E
YNSXR0110RCB
KCRVB
WTYXR0135AK1
1FMXT03.82JS
TTY1095AYMEO
VNS1110AYMEA
XTYXR0135AK1
WFMXE0115BAE
VCR1049AYPBN
4KMXR0100C02
L134-2A
Unknown
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Carb
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Throttle-body
Air Intake
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
4
6
4
6
4
6
8
4
6
6
8
4
4
4
6
6
4
6
8
6
6
4
6
4
6
6
6
Disp
2.4
2.4
2.4
3.8
3
4
3.5
3
2.5
3.1
2
4.9
1.9
2.5
5
2
3
3.7
5.7
1.6
2.4
1.9
3.1
3
1.8
3.5
4520
3.8
4.3
2.3
3
1.9
3
3.3
3.5
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Cm3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1987
1997
2001
1999
1994
2003
2004
2000
1987
1997
1996
1989
1993
2003
1987
1999
2001
1986
1997
1992
1997
1995
2001
1998
1996
2002
1980
1993
1990
1996
1994
1996
1995
1989
2000
OBD Type
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
OBD II
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
OBD II
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
OBD II
NoOBD
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, Canada
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
Emiss
Cert
Details
Light duty
SFTP, CFI
not Califon
LEV light t
NLEV, LE\
LEV
LEV
NLEV, Cle
PCV
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Evap
N
Y
Y
N
Unk
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Engine Family #
HTY2.4T2AFF3
VGM2.4VJGKEK
VGM2.4JGKEK
XCRXT03.8281
RTY3.0VJGFEK
3FMXT04.02FA
4KMXT03.5F03
YTYXT03.0XBP
H1G2.5V5TPGO
VGM3.1V8GKEK
TFMZ.OVJGFEK
KFM4.9T5HGE5
P4G1 .9V5J8H9
3SKXT2.49LC1
H2G5.0V4NLA3
XFMXV02.0VBB
ITYXV03.0FEB
GCR3.7T1BBA1
S3G5.785GBEB
NTY1.6V5FFD6
VGM2.4VJG2EK
1.9F-SFM1045AYPO
1GMXV03.8043
WFMXV03.0DAA
TTY1 .8VJGFFK
2NSXV03.5C6A
80202845
PFM3.8V5FJFO
L3G4.3T5TAA2
TW2.3VJGKEK
RTY3.0VJGFEK
VGM1.9VJGKEK
SFM3.0V8GFEA
K2G3.3V8JAW4
YHNXT03.5EA3
Evaporative Family #
EV-R
VGM1095AYMEA
VGM1095AYMEA
XCRXE0101GCA
RTY1073DYMOO
3FMXR0155BBE
4KMXR0160F03
YTYXE011SAE1
7AO-1C
VGM1095AYMEA
TFM1045AYPAB
9HM
PAO^IC
3SKXR0120164
7134-2A
XFMR0080BAE
ITYXR0135AK1
GCRTD, GCRTE
S3G1085AYMOA
EV-E
VGM1095AYMEA
SFM1.9V8GFEA
1GMXR0133918
WFMXR0115BAE
TTY1047DYMAO
2NSXR0110RCB
Unknown
HM
LFO-3B
TW1058AYPAA
RTY1073DYMOO
VGM1035AYPAA
SFM1045AYMOA
KB020
YHNXE0130AAE
Fuel Delivery Type
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
8
6
8
4
4
8
8
4
6
4
4
8
6
6
4
6
4
4
4
6
4
6
6
8
6
4
4
6
6
6
8
4
6
6
4
6
4
6
4
4
6
( 8
6
6
r 6
8
4
Disp
4.6
4.9
4.6
2.4
2.2
5.3
5
2156
3
2
1.9
Unknown 3
3.5
3.5
2.2
3.3
2.3
1.5
1.6
3.3
2.3
3
3
351
3.1
1.6
1.9
3.1
2.4
3.8
5.9
1.6
4
4
2.3
4.0
2.2
3.1
2.5
1.9
2.4
5
4
3
3
4.3
1.9
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
Cm3
L
L
50
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1995
1989
1994
1998
1996
2002
1990
1997
1990
1999
1995
Unknown
1999
2000
1997
1998
2001
90
1995
1997
1989
2000
2002
1979
1999
1996
1996
1998
1997
2003
1999
1999
1998
1995
2000
1995
2000
1998
1990
2001
2001
1991
1997
1994
1994
1995
1999
OBD Type
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
N/A
OBD I
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA, California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia/Canada
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
TLEV
Light duty
NLEV
NLEV
PCV
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
AIS
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Evap
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Engine Family #
SFM4.6V8GFEA
KFM4.9T5GHE5
RFM4.6V8GAEA
WGMXV02.4024
TTY2.2VJG2GK
2GMXT05.3182
Unknown
Unknown
VHN2.2VJGKFK
LNS3.0V5FCF1
XVWXV02.0223
SFM1.9VBGFEA
Unknown
XCRXV0215V20
4HNXT03.5EA3
VHN22VJGKFK
WCRXT03.32BP
1HNXV02.32J1
LHV15V5F1F2
ST41 .6VH6BFA
VCR3.828GFEK
K2G2.3V8XEWO
YCRXT03.02BO
FMXV03.0VF4-2TW(
5.8M16.6"B"(1X128)
XGMXV03.4041
THN1.6VJGKEK
TGM1.9V8GKEK
WGMXV03.1041
VGM2.4VJGKEK
XCRXT05.9582
WHNXV01 .6CA3
WCRXT04.02BO
SCR4.028GFEA
YHNXV2.3PPG
SFM1120AYMOB
YGMXX02.4021
WGMXV03.1041
LCR2.5V5FBD7
1GMXV01.9002
1 DSXV02.4NG
MFM5.0V5H1367
VCR4.028GFEK
RTY3.0VJGFEK
RT43.0VJGFEK
S3G4.31SGEEA
XGMXV01 .9003
Evaporative Family #
SFM1120AYM1B
9HM
RFM1045YFPOA
WGMXE0095904
TTY1095AYMEO
2GMXE0111920
Unknown
Unknown
VHN1090AYMEA
FI6-1
XVWXE0090233
SFM1045AYPOA
Unknown
XCRXR0101GID
4HNXE0130AAE
VHN1090A4MEA
WCRXE0101XAA
1HNXR0130AAF
90 FD
ST41047D4MOO
VCR1098AYPEA
KAO-2G
YCRXE0101GCA
2FMXR0115BAE
XGMXR0124912
THN1065A4MED
TGM1035AYPAA
WGMXE0095904
VGM1095AYMEA
XCRXE0133GDH
WHNXE0065AAD
WCRXE0101GCS
SCR1058AYPON
YHNXROT30AAA
SFM4.0286FEA
YGMXR0124919
WGMXR0124912
LCRVB
1GMXR0080902
1DSXR0165A1F
Not listed
VCR1049A4PBN
RTY1073DYMOO
RY41073D4MOO
S3G1089AYMON-Fec
XGMXR0080902
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Carb
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Normal
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
6
8
6
8
4
6
6
6
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
6
6
4
6
6
8
4
8
8
6
4
4
6
4
8
6
4
8
4
6
4
6
8
4
4
6
6
8
6
4
4
6
6
6
Disp
3.8
5.3
3.1
4.6
1.6
3.8
3
3.8
2.2
2.5
3.1
3
3
3.1
3.8
3
3
2.3
3
3.8
2
3.3
3
5
2.3
4.5
305
4
1.5
4
2
4.9
3.3
2.1
4.9
2.3
4.2
2.4
3.8
5
2.3
2.2
4.2
3
5.7
3
1.8
2.4
3.5
3
3.2
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
lnj
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1995
2002
2001
2001
1991
1995
2000
1999
2001
2003
1994
Unknown
1995
1993
Jun-95
1993
1989
1988
1992
1994
1995
1994
1989
1996
1986
1973
1977
1996
1989
1988
1998
1996
1979
1996
1990
1990
2004
1987
1995
1984
1997
1996
2004
1995
1995
2001
1995
1998
1996
2002
2000
OBD Type
OBDII
OBD II
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBD 1
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBD I
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBD1
OBDII
No OBD
OBD I
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBD I
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA/Canada
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
NLEV
PCV
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Unk
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Unk
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Evap
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y/Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Unk
N
N
Unk
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Engine Family #
S1G3.8V8GFEC
2GMXT05.3181
1GMXV03.8043
1 FMXT04.6PF5
MNT1.6V5FFD2
S1G3.8V8GFEC
YTYXT03.0XBP
XCRXT03.8281
1GMXV02.4022S
3SKXT2.49LC7
R1G3.1V8GFEA
No sticker
SFM3.0V8GFEA
P1G3.4V8XG25
SFM3.8V8G1BK
PFM3.OT5FZZ5
KCR3.OT5FBL6
JMF2.3T5FFG1
NFM3.0TFZK7
R3G3.828GFEA
None Listed
Not Listed
KCR3.0T5FBL6
TGM5.08PGBEK
GFM2.5V5HCFS
None Listed
None Listed
No sticker model KOZ
1JHN1.5V5FCF4
WCRXT04.02BO
TCR2.0VJGKEK
Not Listed
TCR3.328GKEK
No sticker
LFM2.3T5FNFO
4GMXT04.2185
HTY2.4T2AFF3
S1G3.8V8GFEC
E1G5.7T4HHCX
VFM1045AYPBA
TGM2.218GFEK
4FMXT04.22HB
STY3.087GAFA
S3G5.785GAEA
1TYXTOT3.0FFP
SHN1.8VJGEFA
WNSXT02.4A3A
TCR3.5VJGFEK
2FMXR0115BAE
4CRXV03.5VBO
Evaporative Family #
S1G1058AYMOD
2GMXE0111911
1GMXR01 33910
1FMXE0155BAF
EV-E
S1G105GAYMOD
YTYXE0115AE1
XCRXE0101GCA
1GMXR0124919
3SKXR0120164
R1G1058AYMOA
No sticker
SFM1045AYMOA
PBO-1K
SFM1045AYMOA
None Listed
KCRTC (?)
2.3L8HME8AE-9648
N
R3G1058AYPOA
None Listed
Not Listed
KCRTC
TGM1098AYMBA
E6AE-9C485-ANM
None Listed
None Listed
No sticker model KOZ"
88FD
WCRXE0101TGCS
TCR1049AYPAO
Not listed
TCR1098AYPEA
No sticker
FOAE 9C485DGE
4GMXR01 75922
EV-R
S1G1058AYMOD
4D4-8
VFM2.318GFEK
TGM1089AYMEA
4FMXR0200BBE
STY1047DYMOO
S3G1085AYMOA
1TYXR0150AK1
SHN1077BYMOC
WNSXE0110MBA
TCR1073AYPAO
2FMXV03.0VF4
4CRXR0101GBD
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-lnje
Port Fuel-In
cted
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Superchar f
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal F
Normal
Normal
Normal :
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
6
8
8
r 8
8
4
8
6
4
6
6
8
6
6
8
4
6
4
8
8
8
4
4
4
8
4
6
6
8
6
8
6
4
6
8
6
6
8
1 8
6
6
4
6
8
8
6
4
6
6
4
Disp
3.3
5
4.3
5.7
5.4
1.5
4.4
3.8
2.4
3.5
3.1
4.3
3
3.3
4.6
2.3
3
2.2
4.3
4.6
5.9
1.6
2.5
2
5.7
2.2
3.4
4
5.7
3.3
4
3.9
1.8
3.3
5
3.5
3.4
4.9
5.9
3.3
3.8
2.5
4.3
5
4.9
3.7
2.2
3.3
4
2.3
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1993
1989
1992
1994
2001
1992
1982
2003
1999
2002
1994
1993
1992
1998
1991
1995
2001
1997
1996
1994
1995
1992
1992
1998
1999
1993
2003
1998
1996
1996
2000
1999
1995
1995
1988
2002
2002
1992
2002
2001
2000
1998
2001
1986
1992
2004
1998
2002
1994
OBD Type
OBDI
OBD I
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBDI
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
OBDI
OBDI
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
OBDI
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
California
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
California
No sticker
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
Unknown
Emiss
Cert
Details
LEV
NLEV
LEV
LEV
M on tier 2
PCV
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
EGR
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Evap
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
?
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Engine Family #
PCR3.3U5FKGX
KFM5.8T5HZB8
N3G4.3TBTAA3
R3G5.785GAEB
1FMXE0155BAG
NHN1.5V5FLF8
CIG4.4V2ACA6
3MTXT03.8GNS
XCRXV02.4VBO
2CRXV03.5VD1
Unknown
P3G4.3T5TAA6
NCR3.0T5FFXX
WCRXT03.32BP
MFM4.6V5FDFX
SSZ2.318GFEA
1FMXR0115BAE
VHN2.2VJGKFK
TGM4.35PGFEK
RFM1045AYPOA
SCR5.988GAEA
NSK1.6T5FFC8
PCR2.5V5FBDO
WHNXT02.0UF1
XGMXT05.7183
PFJ2.2V5FFE4
3GMXT034141
WFMXT04.0GAA
TGM5.76PGFEK
TCR3.38GKEK
YCRXT0242230
XCRXT03.92B1
STY1 .8VJGFFA
SCR3.3V8GFEA
JFM5.0V5HBF3
2SZXT03.52KK
NFM4.9T5HGJ4
2CRXT05.9582
1CRXT03.32DT
YGMXV3.8042
WCRXT02.51 BO
1GMXT04.3187
GFM5.0V5HBF9
N2G4.9V8X6A8
4CRXT03.72NO
WCRXT03.32BP
2FMXR0155BBE
Unknown no sticker
Evaporative Family #
R3G1085AVMOA
1 FMXT05.4RF8
92FL
238-1 B
3MTXR0200AIA
XCRXR0101GBC
2CRXR0130GBA
Unknown
PFO-3A
NCRTC
WCRXE0101XAA
SSZ1046B4MOO
1 FMXV03.0VF3
VHN1090AYMEA
TGM1098QYMBA
RFM4.6V8GAEA
SCR1065AYPOA
PVASB
WHNXE0080AAB
XGMXE0133913
HU
3GMXR0212923
WFMXE0105BBE
TGM1098AYPBA
TCR1098QYPBA
YCRXE0101G2S
XCRXE0101GCH
STY1047DYMOO
SCR1095AXP01
2SZXR0175PEO
Missing sticker
2CRXE0101GDH
1CRXR0165XAA
YGMXR0133910
WCRXE0101GCS
1GMXE0095904
?
NBO-2B
4CRXR0155GCH
WCRXE0101XAA
2FMXT0402F3
Unknown no sticker
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In
5cted/T
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-Injected
Port Fuel-In
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal E
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal )
Normal -
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal I
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
4
6
4
8
6
6
6
6
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
6
6
8
4
6
6
8
4
8
6
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
6
8
6
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
Disp
2.3
3
2.2
5.7
3.8
3.1
3.8
2.9
2.3
4.3
3.8
4.3
2.7
3.1
3.8
3
1.9
2.4
3
3
5.7
1.9
3
3
5
2.3
5.4
3
2
2
3
3.8
3
4
3.8
5.7
1.5
85.2CID
3.1
5.2
2.8
1.8
2.5
305
4.9
3
3.8
4.9
7.5
350
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
L
In3
Engine
Cert Year
1996
1995
1994
1993
1994
1998
1993
1993
1996
2002
1996
1988
1995
1996
1994
1995
1993
1978
2001
Unk
2002
1979
1998
2001
1993
1994
1998
1997
1998
1998
1979
1988
1998
1979
1993
1977
1999
1989
1978
1996
1990
1987
1989
1978
OBD Type
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
OBD II
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBD I
OBD I
OBD II
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBD I
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
OBDII
OBD I
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
California
California
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
California
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
NLEV, LE\
NLEV
LEV
LEV
LEV
PCV
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Evap
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Unk
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Unk
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Engine Family #
TFM1045AYPBA
SFM1045AYMOA
R365.785GAEB
PFM3.8V5FJFO
R1G3.1V7GAEA
WFMXE0140BBE
PW2.9V5F951
TGM4.32PGKEK
2CRXT03.8D1
No sticker
EV40
S1G3.1V8GFA
TCR3.82BGFEK
RFM1045AYPOA
SNS2.41JGFEA
PCR3.0T5FFX1
TFM3.028G1HK
840J4U
1GMXV01.9002
No Sticker
2FMXT03.01 F7
45.0(2X124)
WHNXV02.3PA3
5.4L-1FMXE0155B/
PT43.0T5FBE4
R162.0U76FEA
2.0L-WFMXR0080E
3.0LVFM1115AYME
3.8L-WFMXE0140B
WTYXV03.0GXB
PFM4.0T5F44X
3.8L 940B2
JAM4.0T5LN01
WTKXV01 .5VBA
A140F
WGMXV03.1041
PCR5.9TSFEY4
LZ80C
XHNXV01 .8CA3
KT42.5V5FFF7
310L4
No Label
TNS3.028GKEK
L2G3.8V8XEB2
HFM4.9T5HGFI
KFM07.5BTAX
830M4U
Evaporative Family #
TFM2.318GFEK
SFM3.0V8GFEA
R361085A4MOA
R1G1058AYMOA
WFMXT03.8ABA
E3
TGM1089AYMEA
2CRX0165GCA
No sticker
JBM2.7V5F359
S1G1058QYMOA
TCR109BAYPBA
RFM3.078GAFA
SNS1030BYMOB
PTASC
TFM1057BYMBB
8BFV
1GMXR0080902
No Sticker
2FMXR0115BBE
WHNXR0130AAA
1 FMXT05.4RF7
EV-E
R161046AYMOA
WFMXV02.0BFA
VFM3.0V8GKEK
WFMXT038ABA
WTYXE0095AE1
F3AE9L485JBL
963^1
JT-4.OH-1S
WTKXE0104BFA
EVP-CARB-2
WGMXE0095904
PTAPH
XHNXR009AAD
EV-E
BBFV
No Label
TNS1057BYUBB
LBO-2D
7HM
9HN
8BFU
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port uel-ln
ected
Port uel-lnjected
Port uel-ln
Carb
ected
Port uel-ln ected
Port uel-ln ected
Port uel-ln
Port uel-ln
Port uel-ln
ected
ected
ected
Carb
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
8
6
4
4
6
6
4
4
6
4
8
8
4
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
6
6
6
4
6
4
6
8
6
4
8
6
6
6
8
8
6
6
4
Disp
5.7
3.3
2.5
2.3
3
4.9
1300CC
2.5
3.7
2.2
4.2
5
2
2.5
3.5
3.5
3.8
3.5
4
3.3
3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3
14.1
2.2
2.5
1.9
4
3.5
3.9
2
4.3
145.8
3.1
350
3.8
2.5
4.5
3.1
4.3
3
5.8
5
3
2
2.3
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
In3
L
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1997
1999
1992
1992
1992
1996
1973
Not listed
1987
1999
2002
1989
1989
1996
2002
2004
2002
2003
2001
2003
2001
2002
2003
1990
1988
1987
1995
1989
1987
1994
2001
1987
1988
1995
1988
1990
Not listed
1990
1988
1990
1990
1989
1988
1982
1988
1989
1989
1989
OBD Type
OBDII
OBD II
No OBD
OBD I
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBD II
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
OBDII
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
No OBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
California
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
NLEV
LEV
LEV
LEV
EPANLE\
LEV
PCV
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
TAC
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Unk
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Evap
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Unk
Engine Family #
VGM5.76P6FEK
XCRXT03.32BP
NCR2.5T5FGFO
NFM2.3T5FMG1
NFM3.0T5FZFO
TFM1045AYMBB
No Label
No Label
No Sticker
2GMXT04.2185
KFM5.0V5HBF4
KHN2.0V5FNF9
THN2.5VJGKEK
2HNXT03.51AP
4KMXT03.5F03
2CRXT03.82D1
3HNXT03.5ZAP
1CRXT04.02D1
3CRXT03.3DP
1TYXT03.0FFP
2CRXT03.32DP
3CRXT03.3DP
L2G3.3V8JAWJ
JCR3.0T5FBHX
HW2.3V5FFT2
S1G2.2V7GFEA
KCR2.5V5FB06
HFM1.9V5FFF1
RFM1045AXPOA
INSXT03.5C7A
HCR3.9T2HGC4
JHN2.0V5FNF8
53G4.375GAEA
JNS2.4T5HDF2
L3G3.1T5XAT7
Not listed
Not listed
JCR2.5V5FBE6
L2G4.5V8NKA1
LG3.1T5XAT7
K3G4.3T5TAA1
JCR3.0T5FBHX
CFM5.8T2HBF9
JFM5.8T5HZB7
KTY3.0T5FBEX
K1G2.0V5JFGO
Not provided/torn
Evaporative Family #
VGM1098AYMBA
XCRXE0101XAA
NCRTA
9HM
TFM4.968GFUK
No Label
No Label
No Sticker
2GMXR01 75922
9HM
89FG
THN100BYMAR
2HNXR0160AAA
4KMXR0160F03
2CRXR0165GCA
3HNXR0160AAA
1CRXE0101GCS
3CRXR0177XAA
1TXXR0150AK1
2CRXR0165XAA
3CRXR0177XAA
LBO-2F
JCRTC
E3
S1G1089AYMOA
KCRVB
Unknown
RFM4.028GFEA
INSXE0110MBA
HCRT1
88FG
53G1089AYMOA
TBI-7
LBO-3D
Not listed
Not listed
JCRVB
L1 30-21 3
LBO-3D
KFO-3B
JCRTC
2EQ
5.0L-8HM
EV-E
KAO-1E
Not provided/torn
Fuel Delivery Type
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Turbocharge
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
4
4
8
6
8
8
4
8
6
8
8
8
6
4
8
6
6
6
8
4
6
6
8
4
8
6
8
6
8
8
4
6
4
8
4
4
er 4
4
4
8
6
6
4
6
6
4
4
8
4
6
4
8
Disp
1.6
2
6.6
3.8
5
5
2.2
5
3.8
5
5.7
350
4.9
2.9
4.9
2.5
2.8
4.1
5
2.8
4.3
5
6.5
2.4
5
250
350
4.9
3.8
5.7
2.8
3.8
2.3
5
1.9
2.3
1.6
2.2
1.6
5
3.1
4.2
2.2
3.3
3
2.5
2.2
350
2.5
3.8
Unk
5
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
In3
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
In3
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1983
1988
1979
1991
1983
1990
1983
1989
Unknown/r
1988
1976
1986
1990
1988
1990
1989
1983
No label
1988
1992
1985
1978
1987
1987
1976
1973
1990
1980
1989
1987
2003
1989
1984
1994
1979
1974
1988
1999
1989
1990
1991
1982
1990
2001
2001
1976
1984
1990
1990
1986
OBD Type
NoOBD
No OBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
No OBD
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
No label
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
No label
LEV
PCV
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
TAC
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Unk
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Unk
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Unk
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Unk
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Evap
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Ox
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Unk
Unk
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Unk
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Unk
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
N
Engine Family #
DTY1.6V2HFF1
JHN2.0V5FNF8
S30M4U
M2G3.8V8XEB3
DIG5.7T4HAC6
LFM5.8T5HZ89
No sticker
K2G5.0V4NLAB
K2G3.8V8XEB1
No sticker
J3G5.7T5TYA2
10J2
GFM4.9T1HGG7
LFM2.9T5FMF1
JFM4.9T5HGE4
LTY2.5V5FFF8
K1G3.1V8XG24
DTG4.1T2HHSO
No label
J1G2.8WBXRZ2
N3G4.3TBXEB2
F1G5.7V4NEA4
351 M/400EGR
HTY2.415FBT8
H2G5.0V4NLA3
10F1
GM104
LFM4.9T5HGF7
01E2F
K305.7T5TYA3
Not readable
3CRXT03.82DO
KFM2.3T5FNFX
E1G5.7V4NEA3
R4G1 .9V5GEEA
2.3(T)'F'1XL2
JTK2.2T2HFG7
XTKXV01 .6VBB
K3G5.7T5TYA3
L1G3.1V8XG.25
No Sticker
M1G2.2V5JFG3
CFM3.3V1GXF9
LFM3.0T5FYK3
1FJXV02.SJEH
1TYXV02.2JJA
GM20KL
E2G2.5VSTPG7
L2G3.8V8XEB2
No sticker
G1G5.7T4HHC1
Evaporative Family #
EV-A
88FG
9134-3
MBOP-20
3D45-B
9HM
No sticker
KB4-2A
KBO-2D
No sticker
JFO-3C
GGM
9HM
E8AE-9C48S-AFB
EV-E
KBO-1 K
3D68
No label
JBO-12
NBO-3E
584-1A
EV-E
7B4-2A
None listed
9HM
OB3-1
KDO-3C
Not readable
3CRXR0177GCA
9HM
4B4-1A
R41035AYPOA
B
G
XTKXR0125BFB
KFO-3C
LBO-1K
No sticker
MAOP-1 E
2AM
9HM
1FJXR01251BB
1TYXR0135AK1
4AO-2A
LBO-2D
No sticker
6D4S-8
Fuel Delivery Type
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
SFI
Carb
Carb
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb/Throttle-body
Carb/Throttle-body
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Carb/Throttle-bodv
Carb
Carb
Carb
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Carb
ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Carb
ected
ected
Air Intake
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Turbocharae
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Turbocharge
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal f
Normal
-------
Page 4
General Veh Info (ERG)
NoofCyls
4
it 6
8
6
4
6
6
6
6
6
8
6
4
8
6
Unknown
6
6
6
4
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Disp
4.9
2
4.3
5.7
3
2
3.3
3.3
4.9
4.3
3.3
5.7
3.4
2.4
4.9
3
Unknown
3.3
4.3
3.3
2.5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Disp Units
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Engine
Cert Year
1978
Unk
1985
1979
2004
2005
2003
1992
1995
1994
2000
1997
1998
1998
1995
1995
1992
No sticker
1993
2002
1996
1989
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
OBD Type
NoOBD
No OBD
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
OBD II
OBD II
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
No OBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
No OBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
No OBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
NoOBD
Emiss Cert Type (s)
No sticker
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA/Califomia
USEPA
California
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
USEPA
Emiss
Cert
Details
No sticker
Unk
ULEV
LEV
LEV
PCV
N
N - OEM ri
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Unk
N
Y
N
N
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
TAC
N
N-OEMn
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unk
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
AIS
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
EGR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Unk
Evap
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Cat
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
FIR
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ox
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Unk
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Engine Family #
No sticker
Unk
FIG4.3V5NDA7
912K48
SFMXT03.01 FE
5FMXV0231 D4
3CRXT03.32DR
NCR3.31SFGF7
SFM4.9880AJA
R3G4.389GAEA
YCRXT03.32BP
VGM5.76PGFEK
WTYXT03.4DBP
WNSXT02.4A3C
SFM1045AYMOC
SCR3.02BOGFEA
No sticker
No label
P3G4.3TBXEB4
2CRXT03.3DP
TCR2.518GFEK
KFM5.8T5HZZ4
Evaporative Family #
No sticker
Unk
580-1 C
9B4-T
SFMXR0150GAL
5FMXR0120GAK
3CRXR0177XAA
NCRTD.NCRTE
SFM1045AYAMOA
R3G1085AYM08
YCRXE010XAA
VGM1098AYMBA
WTYXE0095AEO
WNSXE0110MBA
SFM4.988GAJA
SCR1095AYMOA
No sticker
No label
PBO-3H
2CRXR0165XAA
TCR1049AYMBN
9HM
Fuel Delivery Type
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Throttle-body
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
ected
Port Fuel-Injected
Port Fuel-In
ort Fuel-In
'ort Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
'ort Fuel-In ected
'ort Fuel-In ected
'ort Fuel-In ected
Carb
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-Injected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-Injected
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
Port Fuel-In
ected
ected
ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Port Fuel-In ected
Air Intake
f
Normal *
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Norma
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84032
84154
84034
84035
84036
84037
84040
84039
84042
84043
84047
84048
84051
84050
84054
84052
84055
84061
84058
84057
84060
84056
84074
84063
84067
84064
84066
84071
84068
84069
84073
84072
84076
84077
84078
84079
84083
84082
84084
84086
84088
84090
84087
84091
BKI Vehicle Info
2001 Chevrolet Cavalier
1979 Ford F1 50 PU
1 999 Isuzu Trooper
2001 GMC Yukon
1995 Ford Escort
1979 Ford F250
1990 Dodge Spirit
2001 Ford F1 50
1996 Honda Civic
1991 Honda Civic
1996 Mazda 626
1989 Dodge Caravan
1995 Chevy Corsica
2002 Honda Civic
1995 GMC Jimmy
1988 Olds Cutlass
1998 Jeep Cherokee
1990 Chevy Cavalier
1999Chysler300M
2001 Saturn SL1
1998BuickLeSabre
2002 Nissan Frontier P/U
1986 Nissan P/U
1998 Saturn SC
1995 Dodge Caravan
1994 Mercury Villager
1995 Jeep Wrangler
1 989 Pontiac Grand Am
2001 Toyota Solara
1997 Dodge Caravan Spoh
1995 Chevy Blazer
2003 Chevy S-10 P/U
1968FordMustang
1999 Honda Civic
1997 Honda Accord
1989 Honda Accord
2000 Honda Accord
2003 Ford Taurus
1998 Chevy Malibu
2004 Honda Odyssey
1998 Chevrolet Lumina
1999 Ford Mustang
2000 Hyundai Tiburon
1991 Cadillac Seville
Dyne Test
Date
07/14/2004
08/10/2004
07/14/2004
07/14/2004
07/15/2004
07/15/2004
07/16/2004
07/16/2004
07/17/2004
07/17/2004
07/19/2004
07/19/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/20/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/21/2004
07/24/2004
07/22/2004
07/22/2004
07/22/2004
07/22/2004
07/23/2004
07/23/2004
07/23/2004
07/24/2004
07/24/2004
07/24/2004
07/26/2004
07/26/2004
07/26/2004
07/27/2004
07/27/2004
07/27/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
07/28/2004
BKI Odo
57066
53503
63387
75374
102663
02285
109270
48831
131492
216571
26614
161033
1 1 1484
50405
102924
81545
131884
81297
73246
51541
45455
38153
138620
74642
138912
131405
71165
116827
48090
90070
100766
19374
98864
76504
79593
209991
77962
25287
99436
21035
70740
39505
89226
70502
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3000
3500
4500
5500
2750
3500
3000
5500
2500
2500
3000
3500
3000
3000
3500
3000
3500
2750
3500
2500
3500
4500
3500
2500
4000
4000
3000
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3000
2500
3000
2750
3000
3500
3000
4500
3500
3500
3000
3500
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
6.4
11.7
14.8
18.8
5.6
10.5
8.7
16.2
6.9
6.9
7.7
7.6
5.9
5.3
10.7
6.4
11.8
5.6
5.8
6.1
5.9
16.5
11.4
6.0
7.0
8.4
15.7
5.9
7.0
7.2
10.7
12.0
8.0
5.1
4.9
6.0
7.8
6.8
5.8
12.0
5.5
9.7
5.9
6.2
Ambient
Temp (F)
82.3
78.4
84.1
85.6
80.5
83.2
81.0
79.5
76.0
77.5
79.9
83.2
84.0
82.0
94.1
89.1
95.8
91.5
87.3
85.9
90.3
85.4
60.2
85.3
87.8
84.7
87.4
77.2
76.7
76.8
62.4
64.7
61.1
66.6
70.4
74.1
76.1
71.9
78.0
73.7
80.1
83.1
77.4
82.9
Pbaro
(mmHg)
743.98
746.42
743.95
743.69
744.40
744.24
742.12
741 .88
744.70
744.79
742.88
742.61
741 .71
741 .60
741 .80
741 .77
741 .76
742.43
741 .73
742.52
742.64
742.31
748.73
743.69
743.77
743.87
743.77
746.61
746.18
746.27
748.49
748.17
748.68
749.59
749.53
749.31
747.42
747.39
747.19
745.09
745.05
744.42
745.04
744.40
RH (%)
55.9
33.7
59.4
58.1
65.7
58.5
75.6
79.7
75.6
70.5
66.2
63.9
71.8
80.3
47.5
60.0
50.1
57.7
65.2
69.2
63.8
70.3
88.5
72.5
65.0
72.3
66.1
84.5
88.6
84.1
84.5
92.0
92.3
85.0
70.3
61.9
42.5
53.0
38.4
49.4
40.8
40.5
44.1
43.9
Test Comments
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
Traction Control (TCS) engaged 100 sec PH1 & 3,
6Cyl. Runs very rough. Leaking mulli|
No dyne test
0
0
0
0
No dyne test
No dyne test
0
0
Engine stalled several times.
0
0
0
No dyne test
0
Coolant on dyno aftertesting
0
AC on/switch broken
Rattling catalyst possibly bad.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No dyne test
0
No Tunnel Heater-Hard shift from M4
0
0
0
0
Zero Drift on Torque Readout.
0
No dyne test
Exhaust Leaks
0
0
0
0
0
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
le fluids. Difficulty maintaining trace. Tailpipe came off during the soak and the first £
84062
3M5.
1998 Buick Lesabre
(1 ) Traction control was engaged during first minute of bag 1 .
No dyne test
0
0
0
0
17/22/200.
45483
3500
5.9
Ambient
Temp (F)
Pbaro
(mmHg)
RH (%)
Test Comments
0 seconds of bag three was lost
83.9
743.49
80.3
Bag1 HC realtime off scale. .using ba
Dups.
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84092
84094
84096
84093
84098
84097
84101
84120
84099
84108
84119
84105
84103
84102
84110
84111
84113
84104
84107
84126
84125
84121
84165
84122
84127
84129
84132
84128
84131
84134
84133
84135
84138
84139
84140
84141
84148
84145
84149
84144
BKI Vehicle Info
1999 Saturn
1993 Ford Explorer
1999 Isuzu Rodeo
1997 Nissan Sentra
1999 Ford Ranger
2002 Mercury Sable
2004 Toyota Camry
1984 Honda Civic
1 999 Toyota Avalon
1990 Honda Civic
1995 Jeep Cherokee
1997 Toyota Corolla
2000 Nissan Maxima
1998 Honda Civic
1995 Ford Contour
1996 Chevrolet S-10P/U
1993 Pontiac Grand Prix
1998 Plymouth Voyager
1989 BuickLeSabre
1988 Ford Thunderbird
1995 Ford Explorer
2001 Volvo S80
1991 Mazda Protege
1999 Dodge Caravan
00 Chrysler Town and Coun
1999 Toyota CelicaGT
1993CherokeeSport
2000 Toyota Camry
1997 Chevy Cavalier
997 Mercury Grand Marqui
1998 Buick Century
1993 Ford Probe
1995 Ford Bronco
1999 Ford Escort
2002 Chevy Blazer
1990 Honda Accord
1991 Dodge Dynasty
1990 Jeep Cherokee
2002 Ford Escort SE
1993 Plymouth Voyager
Dyne Test
Date
07/29/2004
07/29/2004
07/29/2004
07/29/2004
07/30/2004
07/30/2004
07/30/2004
08/03/2004
07/30/2004
07/31/2004
08/03/2004
07/31/2004
07/31/2004
07/30/2004
08/02/2004
08/02/2004
08/02/2004
07/31/2004
07/31/2004
08/04/2004
08/04/2004
08/04/2004
08/12/2004
08/04/2004
08/05/2004
08/05/2004
08/05/2004
08/05/2004
08705/2004
8/06/2004
08/6/2004
08/06/2004
08/06/2004
08/07/2004
08/07/2004
08/07/2004
08/09/2004
08/09/2004
08/10/2004
08/09/2004
BKI Odo
53427
120280
114937
119201
91045
24589
169043
87570
114759
214131
171701
146471
74273
149665
102084
112263
172185
163238
108562
178221
160621
55523
185576
104207
85431
72233
172409
48465
128172
74497
71195
129131
198053
66820
35072
170433
91324
261848
26748
170027
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
2500
4000
4000
2750
3500
3500
3500
2250
3500
2500
4000
2750
3500
2500
3000
3500
3500
4000
3500
3500
4500
4000
2750
4000
4500
3000
3500
3500
3000
4000
3500
3000
5000
2750
3500
3000
3000
3500
3000
4000
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
5.5
10.2
14.0
7.0
12.1
6.8
7.2
7.2
5.9
6.5
13.1
7.8
7.4
5.1
5.0
9.3
5.0
7.0
7.0
9.1
11.5
4.0
7.9
7.3
9.3
6.5
15.6
7.3
5.4
9.5
5.9
8.1
10.7
5.6
11.3
5.9
6.8
10.8
7.3
7.3
Ambient
Temp (F)
73.9
78.0
78.6
75.7
70.8
69.9
77.4
93.6
73.4
87.6
91.9
81.1
74.6
80.8
84.7
88.4
91.0
78.1
86.0
80.5
80.9
82.9
71.6
83.3
70.3
75.4
80.3
73.5
79.4
72.9
68.8
75.2
79.0
69.7
75.1
77.9
83.8
79.2
69.6
75.7
Pbaro
(mmHg)
744.65
744.49
744.05
744.62
742.44
742.90
742.87
742.25
742.63
744.40
742.48
744.92
744.72
742.67
743.32
743.39
743.34
744.89
744.76
743.05
742.41
741 .29
747.42
741 .39
747.95
748.46
747.88
748.40
748.14
749.21
749.13
749.31
748.04
746.93
746.75
746.54
747.29
747.61
748.16
747.59
RH (%)
58.1
47.1
45.7
51.1
63.5
65.0
49.9
44.4
57.6
38.7
44.5
51.7
60.7
44.5
56.8
51.6
47.8
55.7
39.4
61.7
59.9
60.0
37.5
57.5
57.0
45.2
38.3
47.6
38.8
43.6
53.0
38.3
32.0
53.2
44.9
42.4
43.5
49.2
49.4
54.0
Test Comments
0
0
0
No dyne test
0
0
0
0
original miles. Engine temp, was eleva
0
0
0
No dyne test
0
0
0
No dyne test
0
0
0
No dyne test
No dyne test
0
0
No dyne test
Braking Violations
Small exhaust leak between catalyst a
0
0
0
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
184123
84115
84116
84109
(I muffler
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
Ambient
Temp (F)
Pbaro
(mmHg)
RH (%)
Test Comments
1984 Honda Civic
18/04/200.
87590
2250
7.2
85.1
741 .52
56.2
duplicate
1995 Ford Contour
96 Chevrolet S-1 OP
J98 Plymouth Voyag
Bags were being evacuated for the first 30 seconds of bag 1
18/03/200.
18/03/200.
18/02/200.
Throttle sticking. Violation ©the start of bag 3 due to a monitor power failure
braking violations RWD 84137 1993 Jeep Cherokeep8/06/200<
car was hard to start. Had to be cranked over several times before it started.
0
102096
112276
163258
172421
3000
3500
4000
3500
5.0
9.3
7.0
15.6
84.0
87.6
83.0
76.9
742.82
742.80
743.24
748.46
57.1
49.5
59.1
34.9
duplicate
duplicate run. braking violations
duplicate, hp read 3.4 after test
Duplicate. The rear straps were too ti
car was hard to start. Had to be cranked over several times before it started.
0
0
Braking Violations. RWD
No dyne test
5 speed Slipping on the rolls in the beg
0
No dyne test
5 speed
nmg
Front lower engine spport broken. Wired the engine down with a peice of wire to help stabalize the engine for testing.
Stalled @ start of bag 1 .Lots of small holes in muffler. Exhaust leaks
2fmxr0080bae
0
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84150
84151
84153
84146
84157
84162
84161
84166
84160
84164
84171
84168
84172
84167
84175
84174
84173
84179
84182
84178
84185
84184
84191
84183
84189
84188
84193
84195
84196
84192
84198
84197
84201
84208
84205
84204
84206
84209
84211
84210
84213
84215
84214
84216
BKI Vehicle Info
2000 Honda Odyssey
2000 Honda Accord
2000 Ford F1 50 PU
1988 Ford Ranger
void
1994 Nissan Sentra
1983 Chrysler Lebaron
1997 Volvo 850
1994 Mercury Topaz
2001 Ford Focus
1999 Plymouth Voyager
1988 Honda Civic DX
996 Buick Regal Grand Spo
1986 Cadillac Cimmaron
1999 Ford Ranger P/U
1988 Pontiac Bonneville
1994 Mercury Topaz
1996 Mercury Sable
1998 Jeep Cherokee
1995 Ford Thunderbird
1997 Toyota Camry
1996 Toyota Corolla
2000 Honda Civic
2000 Toyota Camry
2000 Toyota Corolla
1984 Ford F1 50 Pickup
1977 Chevy Monte Carlo
2001 Hyundai Sante Fe
1 999 Chevy Lumina
1 993 GMC Safari
2001 GMC Sonoma
1994 Saturn SL1
1990 Buick Regal
1985ChevS10
1989 Lincoln Towncar
1998 Ford F1 50
1994 Chevy P/U
1996 Dodge Stratus
1 986 Ford Tempo
1988 Mazda MX6
1985 Olds Regency 98
1992 Nissan Maxima
1994 Pontiac Bonneville
1990 Ford F1 50 P/U
Dyne Test
Date
08/10/2004
08/10/2004
08/10/2004
08/09/2004
08/11/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/12/2004
08/13/2004
08/13/2004
08/13/2004
08/13/2004
08/14/2004
08/14/2004
08/14/2004
08/16/2004
08/16/2004
08/16/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/19/2004
08/17/2004
08/18/2004
08/18/2004
08/19/2004
08/19/2004
08/19/2004
08/19/2004
08/20/2004
08/20/2004
08/21/2004
08/23/2004
08/23/2004
08/23/2004
08/24/2004
08/24/2004
08/24/2004
08/24/2004
08/25/2004
08/25/2004
08/25/2004
BKI Odo
68979
76178
61040
74743
127063
43291
65093
9950
52253
74703
205828
139861
17610
92926
236760
32694
110411
82874
135049
129432
148865
40410
47780
70126
72318
55537355E
70621
42985
283231
60059
116791
103881
30305
82512
98670
99225
126733
60031
222715
188058
53987
125226
7131
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
4500
3500
4500
3500
2750
2750
3500
3000
3000
4000
2250
3500
3000
3500
3500
3000
3500
3500
4000
3500
2750
2750
3500
2750
3500
4000
4000
3500
4000
3500
2500
3000
3000
4000
4500
4000
3000
2500
3000
3500
3500
3500
4000
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
9.6
7.5
16.9
10.2
7.1
5.5
6.0
6.1
7.3
6.6
6.4
5.6
5.9
11.4
8.5
6.1
6.9
11.8
10.6
7.3
6.6
7.0
7.3
7.5
12.9
11.6
8.7
5.4
12.5
11.3
4.7
6.8
10.4
12.7
13.3
12.2
7.5
6.9
6.8
7.9
8.5
5.3
15.5
Ambient
Temp (F)
68.3
69.4
76.0
82.4
65.9
67.3
65.4
71.5
62.0
70.8
70.8
70.1
73.0
68.5
70.1
66.9
65.2
72.9
76.7
68.7
80.5
77.6
68.4
74.8
84.4
80.2
68.9
70.2
68.0
68.7
65.8
64.3
65.0
75.7
75.1
75.2
71.7
71.9
71.3
75.7
79.8
78.6
81.0
Pbaro
(mmHg)
748.16
748.08
746.76
747.54
747.90
747.99
748.07
747.45
748.22
747.49
749.21
749.47
748.85
749.25
750.37
750.27
750.12
749.00
747.84
748.92
745.47
745.64
746.92
745.75
743.17
743.17
746.67
746.60
746.31
747.06
745.82
745.70
747.59
742.36
742.67
742.87
743.54
741 .86
743.27
740.94
740.84
740.53
741.13
RH (%)
48.5
46.8
38.1
46.6
54.5
41.7
52.9
39.2
56.0
36.6
44.8
46.7
39.6
50.6
47.8
54.6
57.5
43.5
45.1
54.4
50.6
53.1
45.9
58.9
41.4
45.7
45.0
44.1
51.4
45.6
63.2
66.6
67.6
66.8
68.8
67.1
71.1
69.1
69.7
54.3
58.5
61.5
54.2
Test Comments
Traction control Disabled Clean Start
YHNXV02.3PF3
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84156
BKI Vehicle Info
2000 Honda Accord
Dyne Test
Date
18/11/200.
5Spd manual. Check engine light is on. Sliding on rolls ©start of bag .
BKI Odo
76191
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3500
5Spd. Torque meter read 4.6 After loading the vehicle. Reset to zero before start of test.
5Spd. Repaired video cable before start of test. Noticed that the video signal was a little noisy afterward
No dyne test
Muffler removed for testing. Actual mi eage 1 0OK+
traction control disabled. Used an oran e silicone boot which began smoking @ the end of ba
odometer has turned over, rattling fro
0
1 84169
1994 Mercury Topaz
18/13/200.
JB's first time driving, tunnel heater set point changed from 109 to 108 degrees
5 Speed. Stalled twice in Bag 2. 1 .5L
3.8 L
2.8L Vehicle mileage is in excess of 1 00k
5 speed 3. OL I I
3.8 liter | | 84180
Car infested with fleas. Driver switched @ 700 sec.
check engine light on
4.0L RWD. Braking Violations
4.6L RWD. Braking Violations.
2.2L
5Spd.
YHNXV01.6CA3
YTYXV02.2XBA
ytyxr0115ak1
188 Pontiac Bonnevil
nto bag 2. JFsrtook
18/16/200.
over for JF
9961
236790
r. Mileage
g2.
3000
3500
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
7.5
6.1
8.5
stated is in excess of 100K
Ambient
Temp (F)
65.4
70.7
74.6
Pbaro
(mmHg)
747.56
749.47
748.74
RH (%)
59.4
44.0
44.4
Test Comments
Sample bags for bags one and two w
Dupe Mileage is in excess of 100K
Duplicate. 3.8L. Stalled @ start of tes
3spd W/OD. Runs very rough. Exhaust leaks. Staled Bag 2 approx 770 sees. HC was off scale for 95% of the test. Using Bag values for HC instead of Realtime.4.9 L 6cyl.
No dyne test
Stalled @ start of test. Added brake fluid Brakes faded after heating up. Braking vio oations.
1HYXT02.4S3S
No dyne test
3.1 L
4.3L RWD. Braking violations
1GMXT04.3187Eng. code called for-
0
hard cold start
No dyne test
No dyne test
5 )0# inertia.
84200
No bag info for phase 1 & 2 RWD poor braking
No dyne test
0
0
No dyne test
Some engine skipping on accels
Check Engine light is on.
0
0
0
No dyne test
Low Mileage vehicle.
Late crank, ~ 20 seconds into Ph1
0
Ran © S-10 load of
1994 Saturn SL1
3500# S-1
18/21/200.
engine cc
116822
de1GMXT04
2500
3186
4.7
65.2
747.51
68.8
Duplicate
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84224
84219
84231
84221
84220
84225
84227
84228
84223
84233
84230
84229
84234
84239
84238
84236
84235
84244
84241
84245
84240
84242
84246
84248
84257
84256
84250
84254
84253
84252
84258
84263
84261
84265
84266
84267
84271
84268
84270
84276
84274
BKI Vehicle Info
2002 Ford Taurus
1994 Chrysler Concorde
1994 Olds Eighty Eight
985 Ford LTD Crown Victor
1992 Ford Escort
2000 Honda Civic LX
1997 Buick Century
1992 Pontiac Grand Am
2005 Dodge Caravan
1989 Toyota Corolla
1993 Nissan Sentra
2000 Olds Silhouette
1991 VW Cabriolet
1987 Ford Taurus
1988 Pontiac 6000 Wagon
1992 Olds Achieva
1 990 Geo Prizm
1992 Ford Escort
1998 Ford Contour
1987 Honda Accord
1998lnfmitil30
1 997 Plymouth Voyager
1994 Eagle Talon
1987 Ford Ranger
1983 Volvo GL
1989 Chevy S10P/U
1987 Ford Escort
1997 Mercury Sable
2001 Ford Taurus
1991 Olds Delta 88
1989 Dodge Ram P/U
1989 Toyota Camry
1984 Buick Century
2000 Kia Sephia
1989 Chevrolet Cavalier
1979 Buick LeSabre
1994 Ford F1 50 P/U
986 Mercury Grand Marqui
1989 Buick Park Avenue
1995 Ford Aspire
Dyne Test
Date
08/27/2004
08/26/2004
08/28/2004
08/26/2004
08/26/2004
08/27/2004
08/27/2004
08/27/2004
08/27/2004
08/28/2004
08/28/2004
08/28/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/30/2004
08/31/2004
08/31/2004
08/31/2004
BKI Odo
72468
169018
128014
100260
12788
35766
86430
140191
18159
181875
87073
85292
63829
33610
133737
177104
176712
11345
118535
19268
08/31/2004 | 50005
08/31/2004
09/01/2004
09/01/2004
09/02/2004
09/02/2004
09/01/2004
09/02/2004
09/02/2004
09/08/2004
09/09/2004
09/09/2004
09/09/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/10/2004
09/11/2004
09/11/2004
70430
109747
1705
184224
174034
78217
104330
30917
226269
132325
269020
1878
58660
58439
37608
169749
36277
128607
188078
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3500
3500
3500
3500
2750
2750
3500
3000
4000
2500
2500
4000
2750
3000
3500
3000
2500
2750
3000
2750
3500
3500
3500
3000
3000
3000
2500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3000
2750
2750
3500
4500
4000
3500
2250
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
6.5
7.8
6.5
9.3
6.4
7.0
5.9
4.7
8.0
5.9
6.2
11.5
8.0
6.9
6.8
4.9
6.9
7.4
4.8
6.0
6.4
6.7
10.6
10.4
10.5
10.4
7.4
8.0
6.8
7.0
15.0
7.7
7.3
6.3
6.7
10.5
12.9
10.7
6.0
6.1
Ambient
Temp (F)
83.1
78.6
75.5
82.2
80.0
83.8
85.8
86.7
82.2
76.5
75.5
77.6
71.0
79.8
78.6
75.1
73.0
80.8
77.0
81.8
74.7
79.2
74.7
79.3
82.1
81.7
81.1
77.7
75.1
70.8
74.5
66.0
78.4
72.3
74.3
81.5
76.7
79.6
78.7
74.4
Pbaro
(mmHg)
743.18
741 .31
746.31
741 .60
741 .53
743.29
743.32
742.99
743.01
745.80
745.71
745.36
747.73
747.95
747.89
748.17
747.94
749.36
749.88
748.95
749.62
749.90
749.13
749.91
746.06
746.47
749.43
747.38
747.28
749.36
748.57
747.79
747.60
748.57
748.70
747.41
748.64
747.87
747.57
748.19
RH (%)
52.9
64.8
50.4
54.3
60.0
49.6
46.2
44.8
56.8
44.7
53.8
55.2
74.0
31.5
37.4
59.1
63.6
45.4
12.8
24.3
Test Comments
0
0
0
No dyne test
new muffler and tailpipe
0
0
0
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
Manual Transmission Stalled once in bag 2
0
0
0
Change oil lighten.
0
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
Losing coolant (oil mix ?)..but not overtieating.. stopped Ph2 @ 1300 sec.
No dyne test
Shut off twice during initial idle..possib
0
I
e exhaust leak.
Bag 1 did not fill.. Realtime ok.. Engine cut off at 10 sec.
0
0
No dyne test
0
40.4 |0
10.4
49.7
48.9
37.1
36.9
46.2
35.8
34.4
1.5
41.8
65.7
37.2
54.8
47.5
30.2
39.8
30.6
33.8
49.6
0
Cut off during first 10 seconds of Ph 1
No rear brakes, brake lines leaking profusely.
0
Roll/tire slippage on Ph1
Vehicle ran hot, coolant added.
No dyne test
0
0
No dyne test
0
0
Clutch slips, Massive exhaust leak.
Runs poorly, "Check Engine" lamp illur
0
0
Ignition switch stuck at start of Ph3.
0
0
0
0
84262
n nates spor
1991 Olds Delta 88
tcallv, used HC baq
19/09/200-
values.
BKI Odo
227290
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3500
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
7.0
Ambient
Temp (F)
71.8
Pbaro
(mmHg)
748.36
RH (%)
50.2
Test Comments
Dup. First 700 seconds @3000 #s ine
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84272
84273
84278
84277
84286
84285
84287
84291
84289
84293
84295
84302
84301
84300
84297
84292
84298
84296
84304
84307
84308
84305
84303
84309
84310
84315
84316
84311
84318
84322
84317
84314
84319
84375
84321
84325
84324
84327
84329
84323
84334
84335
BKI Vehicle Info
2001 Honda Accord
1 990 GMC Jimmy
1978MGMGB
1997 Olds. Silhouette
2000 Honda Civic
I995 GMC Sierra P/U
1997 Honda Civic
4 Olds Custom Cruiser Wa
1 984 Volvo GL Wagon
1 987 Chevy Caprice Classic
1993 Ford F1 50 P/U
1989 Pontiac Grand Prix
1990 Buick Lesabre
1 996 Dodge Stratus
1997 Toyota Camry
1999 Dodge Durango
1998 Honda Civic
2001 Honda Civic
1992 Honda Accord
1994 Pontiac Grand Am
1999 Chevy Malibu
2002 Olds Silhouette
1973 Mercedes 280 SE
2003 Chevy Venture
1991 Plymouth Voyager
1996 Dodge Avenger
1989 Toyota Corolla
1997 Nissan Sentra
1990 Toyota Camry
2000 Nissan Altima
1989 Plymouth Sundance
1998 Toyota Camry
2001 Ford Wmdstar
1996 Toyota Avalon
1998 Nissan Maxima
1999 Toyota Camry
1998 Ford Taurus
1997 Jeep Wrangler
2004 Kia Rio Cinco
Chevrolet Caprice Estate W
988 Mercury Grand Marqui
Dyne Test
Date
09/11/2004
09/11/2004
09/11/2004
09/14/2004
09/14/2004
09/14/2004
09/15/2004
09/14/2004
09/15/2004
09/15/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/15/2004
09/16/2004
09/16/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/17/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
09/18/2004
08/21/2004
09/21/2004
08/21/2004
09/18/2004
08/21/2004
09/30/2004
08/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/21/2004
09/22/2004
09/22/2004
BKI Odo
39702
130254
42926
111026
46677
171370
75783
8983
299703
85915
184984
149395
59413
146579
127414
92681
115370
49751
74582
101526
76627
40271
81588
24915
158771
124729
80749
154255
202804
95313
144672
127663
37923
108189
111655
60286
77804
94832
6260
72464
87717
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3500
3500
2750
4000
2750
4000
2500
4500
3000
4000
4500
3500
3500
3000
3500
5000
2500
2750
3000
3000
3500
4500
4000
4500
3500
3000
2500
2750
3000
3500
2750
3500
4500
3500
3000
3500
3500
3500
2750
4500
4000
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
7.8
14.5
6.1
10.1
7.0
12.2
5.0
11.6
10.7
9.7
12.8
4.5
6.8
7.5
7.3
16.9
5.1
8.0
5.7
5.4
5.8
16.2
11.4
16.2
7.6
4.4
5.9
7.0
5.9
7.9
6.9
6.4
10.1
6.2
6.1
6.4
5.0
16.1
6.7
9.6
12.5
Ambient
Temp (F)
72.3
79.9
79.3
80.7
79.2
83.5
80.4
86.7
79.7
79.5
79.1
78.1
77.1
70.9
80.8
74.0
68.1
71.2
76.8
77.4
74.2
65.1
78.2
73.6
83.4
84.6
74.0
75.3
81.4
73.8
80.6
77.5
64.5
80.5
77.6
75.4
80.8
83.2
74.0
80.2
82.3
Pbaro
(mmHg)
748.03
747.05
747.54
743.51
743.39
743.31
741 .40
742.44
742.17
742.41
745.06
745.57
746.18
747.08
741 .83
746.92
746.88
746.55
745.98
745.47
746.44
746.51
744.24
747.61
746.37
746.05
747.14
747.99
746.39
747.89
746.46
747.82
746.50
746.86
747.83
747.84
747.54
747.14
747.59
748.60
748.07
RH (%)
65.2
33.7
30.4
53.0
56.1
49.8
56.4
41.2
61.8
59.8
32.1
31.3
33.1
50.9
56.9
44.2
64.6
47.3
41.1
42.3
42.5
63.6
42.1
63.3
46.4
46.3
62.2
36.7
31.5
41.7
48.3
35.3
12.0
33.3
43.7
45.1
41.5
38.3
46.8
37.5
36.7
Test Comments
0
No dyne test - dyne test voided
No Bag Data
0
Traction control began to work @ the s
YHNXV01.6TA3
Tailpipe Missing. Ran 6' of siliconetub
No dyne test
1.6L
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
tart of bag 3. disabled it by restarting the engine Violati
to get the exhaust to the back of the vehicle.
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
ans @ the sta
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
rt of bag 3
Ambient
Temp (F)
Pbaro
mmHg)
RH (%)
Test Comments
Mileage stated is in excess of 1 0OK. Stalled repeatedly in bag 1 . Exhaust eak @ manifoldHooked up a new sensors flow meter down stream from our normal meter. Background HC reading were
Stalled in bag 1
Stalled in bag 1 . Exhayst leaks.
No dyne test
RWD. Braking Violations
3.1 L. Real time Bag 1 HC off-scale. .us
Mileage stated is actual miles
nq baq value.
Nox Air supply was interupted @ some point during the run. Glitch in the regulator or the cylinder valve or the bench operator? The gauges on the regulator read zero. As soon As I touched the
2.2L
5.9L
I
Stalled in bag 1 200 seconds-*-. A large truck parked out back of the bu
1HNXV01.7YJ9 No HP settings were listed in the database. Ran @ 6.0
0
0
3.1 L
84312
Traction control engaged 1 st 40 seconds of bag 1 .
394 Pontiac Grand A
ding during the run wh ch may account for the increased CO2 backgroun
19/18/200.
101538
3000
5.4
74.3
747.25
d.
61.1
Duplicate run
RWD poor braking performance. Braking Violations. It is unknown whether the mi eage stated is actual miles.
No dyne test
No dyne test
3.4L 3GMXT03.4141 There was no
exhaust leaks
5spd. Car was smoking heavily @ sta
1.6L
- 3 listed in the load tables for this year mode
1up and @ the beginning of the PEMs run.
CHECK ENGINE AND BRAKELIGHTCAME ON 280 SECONDS INTO TEST
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OIL SMOKE FROM UNDER HOOD F
0
84328
I. Usedth
e load listing'
or 2GMXT03.4'
41.
1996 Toyota Avalon
.LED ROOM
19/21/200.
108210
3500
6.2
82.0
747.32
40.7
0
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84336
84330
84332
84331
84339
84342
84337
84343
84347
84344
84345
84351
84354
84353
84349
84284
84280
84279
84283
84281
84359
84356
84357
84355
84362
84363
84361
84367
84365
84373
84369
84372
84368
84370
84366
84376
BKI Vehicle Info
1987 Toyota P/U
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier
1997 Pontiac Grand Am
399 Plymouth Grand Voyag
1 994 Toyota Camry
2003 Ford Ranger P/U
2004 Kia Sedona
1995 Toyota Corolla
2000 Toyota Sienna
1997 Chevrolet Lumina
1996 Ford Contour
1989 Ford F1 50
1993 Saturn Wagon
2003 Chevrolet Tracker
1 987 Chevy Caprice Wagon
1 999 Ford Escort
2001 Toyota Camry 3.0L
1986 Dodge P/U
1995 Chevy Suburban
1992 Toyota Corolla
1 997 Pontiac Grand Am
1995 Mercury Tracer
2001 Chevrolet Lumina
1998 Ford Taurus
1996 Toyota Corolla
2002 Nissan Maxima
1980Mercedes450SEL
1993 Ford Taurus
1990 Chevrolet Astrovan
1996 Volvo 850 Wagon
1 994 Toyota Camry
1997 Saturn SL
1995 Ford Taurus
1989 Olds Cutlass Wagon
2000 Honda Odyssey
Dyne Test
Date
09/22/2004
09/22/2004
09/22/2004
09/23/2004
09/23/2004
09/23/2004
09/24/2004
09/24/2004
09/24/2004
09/24/2004
09/25/2004
09/25/2004
09/25/2004
09/25/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/13/2004
09/27/2004
09/27/2004
09/27/2004
09/27/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/28/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
09/29/2004
09/28/2004
09/30/2004
BKI Odo
225176
8420
57230
75489
128229
11678
6344
106201
131771
133436
98572
61510
220839
22365
29828
74102
61415
47582
73848
84923
120921
146970
57829
91855
288784
80356
185888
69365
235476
81784
88215
170227
70394
118187
117948
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
2750
3000
3000
4000
3500
3500
4000
2500
4000
3500
3000
4000
3000
3000
4500
2750
4000
3500
5000
2750
3000
2750
3500
3500
2750
3500
4000
3500
4000
3500
3500
2500
3500
3000
4500
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
9.6
3.9
3.8
6.6
7.2
4.1
6.8
6.0
6.5
5.3
5.6
15.3
4.8
12.7
9.6
4.9
7.0
12.8
10.8
8.6
3.8
4.5
7.0
5.0
6.6
5.0
8.3
5.5
12.0
7.3
7.2
6.7
5.4
5.7
9.6
Ambient
Temp (F)
82.2
73.3
76.8
78.0
77.5
75.4
67.6
77.8
71.3
74.1
73.7
79.9
78.4
66.8
83.9
78.9
77.1
82.8
80.5
76.0
69.1
72.4
65.4
68.0
67.4
68.3
73.6
72.1
71.6
63.2
71.0
58.8
67.0
73.1
67.0
Pbaro
(mmHg)
747.54
748.85
749.25
747.10
747.29
746.41
749.27
749.08
749.60
749.54
750.62
749.66
750.19
750.40
743.26
744.70
744.89
743.74
744.53
747.63
748.45
748.32
748.19
749.80
750.24
749.34
749.22
749.80
747.30
749.46
748.04
749.19
749.26
749.40
746.65
RH (%)
33.4
44.6
39.7
46.6
46.0
47.2
58.3
31.4
49.3
42.5
44.1
27.6
31.6
60.0
35.6
44.4
47.2
37.2
38.7
51.8
54.6
51.9
55.0
28.9
27.4
30.9
20.0
20.6
17.7
12.3
16.0
11.9
14.8
20.2
12.5
Test Comments
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
BKI Vehicle Info
BRAKE PROBLEMS(NONEATTIMES)BORDERLINE OVERHEATING
TRACTION CONTROL DISABLED
HC2 NOT RESPONDING
No dyne test
0
0
0
NOX 03 AIR CHANGED/LOST O3 AF
0
0
No dyne test
0
0
0
0
0
84341
84338
:R SPAN/N
84350
J97 Pontiac Grand A
2001 Saturn
OT READING DURII
997 Chevrolet Lumin
mileage stated is in Excess of 1 0OK. Exhaust leaks.
Stalled @ 230 seconds in bag 1 | |
Dyne Test
Date
19/23/200.
19/23/200.
GTEST
19/25/200.
BKI Odo
57260
63172
133465
Torque zero board was dislodged @ the end of the test. Not sure when this occured.
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3000
3000
3500
mileage stated is in excess of 100K. Runs rough. Bag 1 HC off-scale. .using bag HC value for Bag1.
Rear wheel drive. Braking Violations
0
0
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
3.8
6.4
5.3
Ambient
Temp (F)
76.0
77.2
70.7
Pbaro
mmHg)
747.59
746.83
750.62
RH (%)
54.3
46.7
49.5
Test Comments
DUPLICATE RUN
DUPLICATE RUN
DUPLICATE RUN
EXHAUST LEAKAT MOTOR/700 SECONDS STARTED SKIPPING/WORSE AT END OF BAGI I/RECONNECTED 2 PLUGWIRES AT FIRST IDLE OF BAG III
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84380
84381
84379
84383
84384
84377
84386
84382
84396
84397
84393
84394
84399
84401
84398
84402
84406
84404
84407
84403
84408
84413
84409
84412
84411
84419
84418
84414
84415
84416
84422
84425
84420
84424
84421
84428
84430
84426
84427
84431
84433
84437
84442
84436
84432
BKI Vehicle Info
1995 Lincoln Continental
1994 Mercury Marquis
1 998 Pontiac Grand Am
1996 Toyota Camry
1 996 Geo Prizm
1997 Honda Accord
1990 Nissan Maxima
1999VWCabrio
1995 Ford Escort
75 Chevrolet Silverado 20 F
1999 Chrysler 300M
2000 Honda Odyssey
1997 Honda Accord
1998 Plymouth Voyager
2001 Honda Accord
1991 Honda Civic
1995 Toyota Corolla
1 997 Dodge Caravan
1989 Pontiac GrandAm
2000 Dodge Caravan
2002 Mercury Sable
1979 Ford F250PU
1999 Chevrolet Malibu
1996 Honda Civic
1996 Saturn SC
1998 Chevrolet Lumina
1997 Pontiac Grand Am
2003 Chevrolet Impala
1999 Dodge Durango
1998 Honda Civic
1998 Jeep Cherokee
5 Jeep Grand Cherokee La
2000 Honda Accord
1 995 Ford Explorer
2000 Saturn Sedan
1998 Chevrolet Malibu
1990 Dodge Spirit
2001 Saturn Sedan
2001 Mitsubishi Galant
11 Mercury Grand Marquis £
1997 Jeep Wrangler
1 994 Toyota Camry
1 994 Toyota Camry
1995 Chevrolet S10PU
1999 Saturn Sedan
Dyne Test
Date
09/30/2004
09/30/2004
09/30/2004
10/01/2004
10/01/2004
09/30/2004
10/01/2004
10/01/2004
01/12/2005
01/12/2005
01/12/2005
01/12/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
01/13/2005
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/15/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/17/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/18/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/19/2005
01/20/2005
01/20/2005
01/21/2005
01/20/2005
01/20/2005
BKI Odo
100959
127784
75722
164875
169535
77801
258738
38317
106996
2893
90240
74601
82926
168876
62350
220022
107983
96455
123575
85198
29501
5797
79925
140479
78346
79187
58100
11340
95999
118218
137053
179121
84180
162634
51721
107047
93661
44251
51764
19292
97532
131874
131894
124976
98565
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
4000
4000
3000
3500
2750
3000
2750
3000
2750
4000
3500
4500
3000
4000
3500
2500
2500
3500
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
2500
2500
3500
3000
3500
5000
2500
3500
4000
3500
4500
2750
3500
3000
2750
2750
4000
3500
3500
3500
3500
2500
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
5.7
10.7
4.4
6.9
7.0
4.9
5.8
6.9
5.6
13.9
5.8
9.6
4.9
7.0
7.8
6.5
6.0
7.2
5.9
7.2
6.8
10.5
5.8
6.9
6.0
5.5
3.8
2.9
16.9
5.1
11.8
13.1
7.5
11.5
4.0
5.9
8.2
3.7
3.7
10.3
16.1
7.2
7.2
10.8
5.5
Ambient
Temp (F)
75.9
76.7
73.8
70.4
70.4
69.9
71.6
71.3
39.1
39.3
37.9
39.2
32.7
30.1
32.8
29.4
20.9
14.5
23.9
12.2
15.9
18.4
17.9
17.8
18.4
34.1
31.4
27.2
28.4
28.2
37.4
43.9
30.4
41.3
34.9
46.3
46.7
39.4
45.2
47.1
48.3
60.1
40.7
56.3
44.7
Pbaro
(mmHg)
744.68
744.43
745.52
744.05
744.22
746.53
743.85
743.88
735.36
735.39
735.51
735.81
746.99
747.74
745.88
749.29
757.05
758.07
756.85
756.88
760.07
758.93
760.61
759.17
759.53
758.24
758.31
759.38
760.06
759.52
754.57
750.62
755.93
751 .65
755.56
751 .20
749.92
749.92
751 .03
749.48
744.43
742.95
743.97
743.27
744.21
RH (%)
17.1
17.8
16.0
13.7
15.0
13.6
15.1
13.6
65.5
65.8
70.6
69.1
43.4
41.3
45.7
39.2
36.0
43.0
32.5
41.7
45.3
47.0
43.5
44.8
43.9
30.8
33.5
40.1
33.7
36.0
38.5
39.3
39.4
41.5
36.4
56.5
56.0
61.8
58.3
54.9
57.4
47.0
59.6
50.5
60.5
Test Comments
0
No dyne test
0
0
0
No dyne test
0
No dyne test
0
Vehicle would not go into gear for firs!
0
0
0
Coolant Temp = 55.4 F (semtech data
nitial coolant temp = 43 F (semtech da
nitial coolant temperature = 39 F.
0
nitial coolant temperature = 44 F
0
0
0
Service engine soon light is on.
Initial engine coolant temperature = 28
Tunnel heater off on Phase 3.
0
0
0
0
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
2 minutes.
:a
F.
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
TUNNEL WARMED 40 MINUTES/20 GAL. DIESEL FUEL ADDED TO GENERATOR]
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
GENERATOR RAN OUT OF FUEL AT START OF PHASE III TUNNEL HEATER STOPPPED/SEMTECH HAS BURN SME
TRUCKS NEXT DOOR STARTED FIRST MINUTE OF TEST
* LICENSE* QGD396 FOR SUMMER STUDY
0
5 SPEED/BKG HIGHER/TRUCKS
LOWERED"NOT CLOSED" DOORS D
0
0
0
0
LICENSE # WAS REPORTED AS SKJ
0
UETOWIN
3
248 FOR SUMMER STUDY
2DRI REPLACED COMPRESSOR BEFORE RUN
JU MP STARTED/OIL LEAKING ON CROSSOVER
0
0
DUPLICATE RUN/ COLDER DAY
HY-HE CHANGED AT 1 1 :40/BAD REf
0
R BRAKES
PIPE-PRE-CATALYST/SMOKED BUILDIN
ON TRUCK
G/SECOND
UILDING EXH
Ambient
Temp (F)
-LATVI
Pbaro
(mmHg)
RH (%)
WST FAN TURNED ON
Test Comments
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84434
84438
84443
84439
84446
84448
84445
84444
84449
84453
84452
84456
84455
84458
84462
84467
84457
84459
84465
84463
84464
84469
84475
84470
84472
84473
84477
84474
84482
84479
84487
84485
84489
84488
84492
84494
84495
84493
84497
84498
84499
84500
84502
84503
84504
BKI Vehicle Info
QAZ044
2001 Buick Century
1991 Geo Prizm
1995 Pontiac Bonneville
2000 Toyota Sienna
1 999 Plymouth Voyager
2001 Saturn Sedan
2003 Chevrolet Tracker
1994 Buick Regal
1995 Nissan Maxima
1995 Ford Taurus
1993 Pontiac Grand Prix
1995 Ford Mustang
1 993 Ford Aerostar
1989 Plymouth Voyager
1988 Ford Ranger PU
1 995 Ford Crown Vic
1 992 Ford Aerostar
1994 Chevrolet LuminaAPV
1995 Ford Contour
1994 Dodge Intrepid
1989 Dodge Caravan
1 986 Ford Tempo
1973 Mercedes 280 SE
1977 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
1996 Ford Explorer
1989 Dodge Ram 50
1988 Honda Civic
1996 Dodge Neon
1979 Buick Lasabre
1996 Dodge Caravan
1992 Mazda B2200 PU
1991 Cadillac Fleetwood
1987 Toyota PU
1995 Buick Lesabre
1 984 Chevy C-1 0 Silverado
1997 Ford Ranger PU
1 996 GMC Sonoma PU
2004 Ford Freestar Minivan
1995 Toyota 4 Runner
2001 Toyota Sienna
1995 Acura Integra
1998 Nissan Frontier PU
1996 Chrysler Concorde
2002 Ford Taurus
2000 Chrysler Concorde
Dyne Test
Date
01/20/2005
01/21/2005
01/21/2005
01/21/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/22/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/25/2005
01/26/2005
01/26/2005
01/27/2005
01/26/2005
01/26/2005
01/27/2005
01/27/2005
01/27/2005
01/28/2005
01/29/2005
01/28/2005
01/28/2005
01/29/2005
01/29/2005
01/29/2005
01/31/2005
01/31/2005
01/31/2005
02/01/2005
02/01/2005
02/02/2005
02/02/2005
02/02/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/03/2005
02/04/2005
02/04/2005
02/04/2005
02/04/2005
02/05/2005
02/05/2005
BKI Odo
0
33749
132326
168145
137493
79230
67290
29519
92177
181395
139316
177931
146289
147319
145307
77528
179731
164560
124172
104083
145950
162878
70396
86134
36999
109593
133981
207265
79839
40364
118369
101090
97124
232098
126036
82259
118470
51863
14714
85898
59734
80579
112521
111502
26406
65330
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Void
3500
2500
3500
4000
4000
3000
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
4000
3500
4000
3000
3500
3500
2500
4000
4000
4500
3500
2250
2500
3500
4000
3000
4000
2750
3500
4000
3500
3000
4500
4000
4000
2750
3500
3500
4000
3000
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
0.0
5.3
7.4
5.3
6.5
6.4
6.4
12.7
5.6
6.5
6.5
5.0
7.5
11.1
7.6
10.2
8.5
11.4
8.9
5.0
5.1
7.6
6.9
11.4
11.6
11.8
15.0
6.4
7.2
10.5
7.2
10.7
6.9
9.6
7.1
15.2
10.9
9.2
10.0
12.9
10.0
7.2
11.0
7.7
8.0
11.3
Ambient
Temp (F)
29.3
40.3
41.5
40.6
23.6
24.7
24.1
25.0
25.8
50.1
46.3
55.4
54.9
45.0
42.9
37.2
42.2
45.4
37.9
34.7
37.2
37.6
36.8
38.0
40.0
33.3
39.4
35.9
37.3
39.0
35.0
44.1
38.9
34.9
35.4
41.4
42.9
47.9
34.5
53.8
43.7
49.7
55.1
60.6
49.2
51.3
Pbaro
(mmHg)
750.53
746.74
743.38
746.22
754.06
754.75
753.20
752.03
755.24
742.60
742.85
740.60
740.70
749.44
749.87
753.33
748.24
749.77
754.67
753.96
754.53
751 .66
749.75
751 .05
749.43
749.31
748.86
749.43
751.61
751 .60
752.01
752.57
753.71
752.70
752.80
751 .72
753.76
753.68
753.54
752.75
752.82
752.68
752.38
751 .02
749.80
749.60
RH (%)
50.1
60.9
61.0
60.1
35.8
38.9
33.4
32.6
39.0
47.8
49.6
44.1
42.7
52.6
50.9
55.0
59.8
51.6
56.0
62.5
61.2
43.0
65.2
42.9
40.9
72.6
59.8
67.1
73.9
70.1
78.3
46.8
59.2
63.0
65.4
39.7
52.4
49.4
58.9
43.3
55.8
51.9
46.1
34.2
45.0
43.9
Test Comments
FID FILTER CHANGED/REAL-TIME C
No dyne test
LOW TRACTION LIGHT ON 30 SECC
No dyne test
0
SMOKE FROM LEAKING VALVE COV
0
Exhaust leak
0
0
dyno began to make an unusual noise
3.0L
Station Wagon 3.0L
engine runs very rough
RWD. Braking Violations
RWD 3.0L Braking Violations
3.0L
RETEST Manual 2.3L Exhaust Termin
RWD 4.6L Braking Violations
RWD 3.0L Braking Violations
3.8L
Retest from the summer study
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84440
v DS/SERVI
ERGASKE
84451
es in front
84468
BKI Vehicle Info
195 Buick Park Aveni
CE ENGINE SOON A
Dyne Test
Date
11/21/200!
MD BRAK
BKI Odo
144956
I LIGHT C
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
4000
\l
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
7.2
Ambient
Temp (F)
40.3
Pbaro
(mmHg)
745.92
RH (%)
58.0
Test Comments
VOID PREVIOUS DAY/VALVE COVE
1994 Buick Regal 01/25/200E 92214 3500 5.6 37.6 742.76 61.3 Dupe. Nox span drifted between spa
afthe axle. Attatched
4 Chevrolet Lumina ,
No Nox data for bag three. Wrote the wrong value on the run sheet
6'ofSilico
11/28/200!
ne hosing
124200
o the pipe to
4000
pet the exhaust
8.9
to the bach
36.6
oftheveh
751.71
cle. Unab
46.3
e to keep up with the hard accels. Rr i
Duplicate
Retest. Major oil leak. Leaked enough to form a puddle 24" across on the concrete under the dyno trailer. L front tire had a broken belt. Rotated back to front to get a good tire on the rolls. Car
No dyne test
Retest. Car Stalled @ 500 seconds nto Bag 2. Restarted car and cont nued without incident
Retest. BKG HC readings were mean nless because the sample cell was saturated. Instruments pegged and stayed that way for the duration of the run. Ambient HC behaved strangely while tryi
RETEST Car runs very rough. Brake fluid was added during bag 1 . Poor Braking performance. Checked the Zero on the ambient HC instrument @ 400 seconds into the Soak. Car is tag is incor
RWD 4.0L Braking Violations
Restest. Low power hard to keep up with trace. Brake light on. Braking Violations
RETEST Sspeed manual.
No dyne test
Retest
3.3L
2.2L
4.9L Chain popped on the front on bac
No dyne test
No dyne test
84484
84490
1979 Buick Lesabre
191 Cadillac Fleetwoi
12/01/200!
12/02/200!
40385
97144
3500
4000
10.5
6.9
Tailpipe is missing and the pipe going into the muffler on the upstream s de is loose. Used a variety of boots and silcone tu
Did not evacuate the bages this AM before the start of the test. May be a little diluted if the ba s leaked overnight.
5.0L Unknown if mileage stated is in excess of 1 0OK
2.3L Sspeed. Braking Violations. Sta ed @ 1000 sec in bag 2.
2.2L 5Spd Braking Violations
4.2L No HP data in the database. Ran with best guess.
Hard to Shift. Does not go into gears easily. Stalled 550 sec in bag 2.
No dyne test
ITYXT03.0FFP
1.8L
RWD Braking Violations
3.5L Gas light is on.
No HP load data in the tables.
0
40.7
36.9
es to get t
753.52
752.63
e exhaust
56.8
55.0
out to the
Retest. Dupe. The EPA people are h
Duplicate
ack of the vehicle. Exhaust leaks. 5 *
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84505
84509
84510
84508
84512
84513
84515
84514
84518
84525
84519
84517
84526
84524
84520
84521
84522
84528
84527
84531
84529
84533
84534
84532
84538
84539
84541
84537
84546
84547
84548
84550
84551
84552
84554
84553
84556
84557
84560
84558
84561
84567
84562
84566
84564
84563
84572
BKI Vehicle Info
1993 Dodge Intrepid
1 992 Chevrolet Astrovan
1994 Chevrolet Suburban
1992 Honda Civic
1982 Chevrolet Caprice
0.00
1999 Dodge Stratus
2002 Chrysler Concorde
1 994 Buick Skylark
CH EVROLET ASTRO, VU
1992 Dodge Caravan
1998 Dodge Caravan
1991 Lincoln Towncar
1995lsuzuPU
2001 Ford Taurus
1997 Honda Accord
1996 Chevrolet 1 500 PU
994 Mercury Grand Marqui
1995 Dodge Ram 1 500 PU
1 992 Geo Tracker
1993 Plymouth Sundance
1999 Chevrolet Suburban
1 993 Subaru Legacy
2003 Pontiac Montana
1998 Ford Ranger PU
1996 Chevrolet Tahoe
1996 Dodge Caravan
2000 Jeep Cherokee
1999 Dodge Dakota PU
1995 Toyota Corolla
1995 Dodge Intrepid
1988 Lincoln Continental
2002 Isuzu Axiom
2002 Oldsmobile Silouette
1992 Ford F50 PU
2002 Dodge Durango
)01 Chrysler Town & Count
2000 Buick Park Avenue
1 998 Dodge Dakota Sport
2001 Chevrolet S-10PU
86 Ford Crown Victoria SW
992 Cadillac Sedan De-Vill
2004 Dodge Dakota PU
1995 Honda Odyssey
1 998 Dodge Caravan
2003 Ford Ranger 4X4 PU
1994 Mercury Topaz
Dyne Test
Date
02/05/2005
02/07/2005
02/07/2005
02/07/2005
02/07/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/09/2005
02/08/2005
02/08/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/10/2005
02/10/2005
02/10/2005
02/10/2005
02/11/2005
02/11/2005
02/11/2005
02/12/2005
02/12/2005
02/12/2005
02/12/2005
02/15/2005
02/15/2005
02/15/2005
02/15/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/16/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/17/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/18/2005
02/19/2005
BKI Odo
210298
217165
187410
124705
88587
VOID
108838
34231
20081 1
0
213493
80989
188033
87225
47479
101888
46711
130521
93425
48704
84652
88900
114227
49337
48208
69010
161280
88513
64155
103068
138989
31667
46363
61168
134791
VOID
75545
67099
49775
106236
54310
155895
8627
109044
127230
18757
41482
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3500
4000
5500
2250
4000
0
3000
3500
3000
0
3500
4000
4000
3000
3500
3000
4000
4000
4000
2750
2750
5000
3500
4500
3500
4500
4000
3500
3500
2750
3500
4000
4000
4000
4500
0
4500
4000
3500
4000
3500
4000
4000
3500
4000
3500
2750
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
6.8
12.5
10.8
4.6
4.6
0.0
5.5
7.8
5.4
0.0
8.0
7.9
7.1
12.0
6.8
4.9
12.2
10.7
15.0
14.5
6.3
12.5
9.0
10.1
11.7
12.5
7.2
12.5
9.6
6.0
5.9
8.3
13.4
9.2
14.6
0.0
8.4
6.6
11.2
9.8
9.0
6.9
12.6
9.8
7.9
11.5
7.0
Ambient
Temp (F)
54.3
34.0
34.9
34.6
31.0
29.3
28.2
27.0
28.7
29.3
29.6
27.7
35.7
33.8
26.8
28.2
29.3
31.4
24.3
40.3
35.2
39.8
44.1
34.9
45.6
47.9
49.8
40.9
47.0
48.6
50.5
53.3
37.9
39.5
44.3
29.3
35.8
40.7
48.8
43.5
51.6
46.6
33.3
44.8
40.1
38.5
46.6
Pbaro
(mmHg)
749.22
749.18
749.35
748.52
748.59
750.53
750.41
750.19
748.58
750.53
748.54
748.85
750.42
750.57
751.16
751.31
751 .43
754.13
753.63
752.84
753.75
752.54
752.57
752.64
745.93
745.80
743.88
745.98
742.63
743.43
743.44
743.44
752.18
752.56
752.37
750.53
752.84
752.60
750.82
752.13
750.46
752.20
753.71
753.08
753.63
753.67
747.60
RH (%)
40.1
60.4
55.5
63.0
57.6
50.1
58.1
56.1
62.8
50.1
61.7
62.7
86.6
94.9
52.3
85.1
103.1
24.0
35.3
17.3
20.7
1.3
5.1
2.4
58.5
57.4
68.3
63.8
63.1
59.8
53.6
42.2
56.4
51.8
38.0
50.1
54.9
42.4
36.1
36.3
32.7
30.4
47.8
32.7
36.7
39.6
65.6
Test Comments
0
No dyne test
0
4X4
No dyne test
0
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
Ambient
Temp (F)
Pbaro
(mmHg)
RH (%)
Test Comments
SMOKED UP ROOM/OTHER DOOR OPENED /HC-CO INSTRUMENTS PEGGED/CATALYST REMOVED PREVIOUSLY-HEADER WRAP APPLIED/
traction control turned off at shifter but car would not get over 5 mph./void run
0
DIESEL TRUCK STARTED NEXT DO
0
DR
VOIDED RUN / NOT ABLE TO GET OUT OF PARK/BLANK(84523) COPIED AS 84525 TO FILL DATA BASE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REPEAT FROM SUMMER
TAG* WAS USED ON 97 HONDA AC
34.4 OIL TEMP/
OIL TEMP 31 .7 / ENGINE SKIPPING
No dyne test
OIL TEMP 41 .4
CORD IN S
MMER STUDY
OILTEMP 39. 1/ Til pipe became disconnected at 1000 seconds for about 30^0 seconds
OIL TEMP 43.0/
OIL TEMP 41 .4
OIL TEMP 41 .91
OIL TEMP 44.4
OIL TEMP 40.5/ CHECK ENGINE LIG
OIL TEMP 49.7 /
OIL TEMP 50.0
OIL TEMP 50.1
OILTEMP 50.3
OIL TEMP 42.0
OILTEMP 42.4
84542
- 84543
OIL TEMP 39.8 / LEFT REAR WHEEL SMOKED
996 Dodqe Caravar
2000 Jeep Cherokee
69915VOID/ RUN NUMBER USED BY DRI /VOIDED AWD
OIL TEMP 39.4
OIL TEMP 40.0
12/14/200!
12/14/200!
161308
88541
4000
3500
7.2
12.5
44.6
49.5
743.87
744.38
61.3
52.5
DUPLICATE/OIL TEMP 44.1
DUPLICATE /CHECK ENGINE LIGH1
PNV789»»NO PHASE 3 DATA»'OIL TEMP 42.2 AFTER SEMTECH RAN OBVIOUS EXHAUST LEAK AT MANIFOLD /TWO BOLTS MISSING/ A NEW BOLT INSTALLED AT (INTAKE-EXHA
2OIL TEMP 39.9 / BATTERY DEAD / ENGINE HAD CORRODED + BATTERYTERMINAL DID NOT IDLE VERYWELL , NUMEROUS RESTARTS / DRIVER KEPT GAS PEDAL ON TO STOP
VQJ544, VOIDED RUN DUE TO COOLANT LEAK AND OVER HEATING AT 1000 SECONDS INTO TEST
OIL TEMP 39.1 / MOTOR MISSING ON ONE CYLINDER/
OIL TEMP 39.8
OIL TEMP 38.7
OIL TEMP 41 .7
2OILTEMP41.7
OIL TEMP 44.8
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84568
84569
84570
84574
84573
84575
84577
84645
84675
84713
84580
84730
84582
84581
84638
84585
84584
84734
84587
84588
84589
84688
84592
84593
84591
84597
84595
84596
84718
84599
84600
84601
84739
84603
84733
84605
84611
84609
84608
84613
84627
84612
84614
BKI Vehicle Info
1999 Ford Ranger PU
1995 Ford Taurus
1994 Chevrolet S10 PU
1993 Ford Taurus
1993 Buick Park Avenue
1994 Chevrolet Lumina
1 998 Ford Aerostar
1993 Volvo 960
1993 Ford Tempo
1996 Chevrolet Blazer
302 Chrysler Town & Count
1995 Chevrolet S10 PU
1988 BMW 528e
1995 Chevrolet Corsica
996 Chrysler Town & Count
1993 Ford Escort SW
1995 Nissan PU
1 993 Plymouth Voyager
1996 Mercury Villager
1978 Buick Regal
2001 Saturn
1993 Ford Taurus
1979 Ford LTD
1998 Honda Accord
1 993 Toyota 4Runner
1994 Pontiac Sunbird
1988 Ford Escort
1997 Ford Taurus
QBI692
1 998 Toyota Avalon
1 993 Ford Explorer
1979 Buick Regal
1998 Mazda Protoge
79 Nissan Datsun 21 0 Wag
1998 Buick Skylark
1977 Nissan 280Z
1989 Toyota Camry
1978 Buick Regal
1996 Nissan Quest
1 990 Oldsmobile Delta 88
1987 Ford F1 50 PU
2000 Ford Ranger PU
1978 Oldsmobile Delta 88
Dyne Test
Date
02/19/2005
02/19/2005
02/19/2005
02/21/2005
02/21/2005
02/21/2005
02/22/2005
03/12/2005
03/18/2005
03/25/2005
02/23/2005
03/29/2005
02/23/2005
02/23/2005
03/11/2005
02/24/2005
02/24/2005
03/30/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
02/25/2005
03/21/2005
02/26/2005
02/26/2005
02/26/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
02/28/2005
03/26/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/01/2005
03/31/2005
03/02/2005
03/30/2005
03/03/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/04/2005
03/05/2005
03/08/2005
03/05/2005
03/05/2005
BKI Odo
126851
203067
63902
39476
74444
126825
0
197094
25053
94350
84580
75640
287806
78767
213656
99988
86705
166916
166799
81379
56662
92978
65850
75067
178462
145869
133085
97601
0
29575
47980
5864
88569
47114
65464
94782
168091
64571
125651
185694
410
33680
73729
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
3500
3500
3000
3500
4000
3500
4000
3500
2750
4000
4500
3500
3500
3000
4000
2750
3500
4000
4000
4000
2750
3500
4000
3000
4000
2750
2750
3500
0
3500
4000
3500
2750
2500
3500
3000
3500
3500
4000
3500
4000
3500
4000
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
9.0
5.4
9.8
5.5
6.1
5.4
7.9
10.3
6.1
10.7
11.1
9.8
10.7
5.9
8.5
6.6
12.0
7.3
7.9
9.9
6.1
9.5
10.7
4.0
12.9
5.2
6.0
6.7
0.0
5.8
10.2
11.8
6.8
9.8
5.9
9.9
8.4
10.8
10.0
6.8
10.4
12.0
8.7
Ambient
Temp (F)
45.0
45.1
45.4
37.7
36.5
39.0
42.0
56.5
52.9
44.1
45.3
66.6
47.2
45.5
42.5
45.5
42.5
63.0
43.9
48.3
52.6
52.1
45.5
49.5
41.4
38.4
36.7
37.4
41.1
29.1
32.3
35.8
50.1
39.4
63.4
45.9
59.2
48.8
41.3
44.9
47.0
42.1
47.6
Pbaro
(mmHg)
749.58
749.09
748.99
747.95
747.36
748.02
751 .46
737.31
740.59
745.38
751 .07
737.58
750.78
750.72
746.25
749.31
749.13
733.73
748.25
748.38
748.40
744.13
749.42
749.32
749.66
746.40
746.17
746.08
748.36
749.21
749.84
749.85
746.56
747.78
733.25
747.04
745.48
745.94
745.70
751 .80
746.42
751 .22
752.11
RH (%)
61.8
62.4
64.5
67.3
71.8
65.5
62.2
34.2
28.9
74.1
45.8
39.6
40.4
45.8
36.3
48.8
53.9
42.9
45.7
40.6
36.0
38.9
46.2
43.0
51.6
40.9
43.7
41.9
65.5
43.9
37.6
31.4
52.1
42.0
42.7
44.8
41.0
65.2
67.3
52.2
34.9
55.2
47.6
Test Comments
OIL TEMP 49.1
OIL TEMP 44.1
OIL TEMP 44.8
No dyne test
Oil Temp = 43.0 F
Oil Temp not taken
Oil Temp = 40.7 F
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
Oil Temp= 48.8 F; Coolant Temp = 44.6 F
2.9L oil temp 50.5F. Minor exhaust eak
OIL TEMP 54.4/ SERVICE ENGINE S
OIL TEMP 51.0 /KEVIN BACK
Traction control problem @ 180 sec o
4.3L oil temp 63.2
Oil temp =46.1 F
Oil Temp = 49.1 F
: 84681
PhL.Coolan
BKI Vehicle Info
1993 Ford Tempo
temp = 50F
Dyne Test
Date
13/19/200!
BKI Odo
25073
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
2750
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
6.1
Ambient
Temp (F)
41.3
Pbaro
mmHg)
747.03
RH (%)
68.7
Test Comments
DUPLICATE / OIL TEMP 50.7 /SERV
oil Temp44.6. 3.8L. Service engine ight is illuminated.
No dyne test
0
Oil Temp = 46.0 F
3.0L Oil Temp 63.0. Adjusted BKG HC
No dyne test
0
Oil Temp = 39.0 F
0
OIL TEMP 54.4
No dyne test
Oil Temp = 45.9,,Absolutely NO brake
45.1
No dyne test
48.1
oil temp 36 ambient temp 36.6
Nox warmed up only 20-25 minutes be
oil temp 41.1
VOID WOULD NOT START
3.0L Origanal mileage
4.0L
3.8L This car used for inreel testing. C
No dyne test
Check Engine Light is on
Vacuum pr
I!
f re start of
84722
ssurefrom 7 to 10.
est. Cyl regulator wa
1998 FordWmdstar
5i temp28.9F
s turned a
13/28/200!
the way d
99476
Fuel Pump Leaking. Mechanical pump was not aval able Locally. Bypassed the mecchanical
3.1 L Oil Temp 66.2 BKG HC failed to reachthe span #.
No dyne test
Oil Temp 42.6F
No dyne test
oil temp 48.6
Tailpipe and muffler removed in front o
No dyne test
oil Temp 42.9
runs rough
4.9L RWD braking Violations.
used 1 999 Load table because 2000 1 a
No dyne test
he axle be
84632
bles seeme
cause of holes. Usec
1987 Ford F150 PU
unrealistic
silicone b
13/09/200!
ots to get
428
wn. O3 gene
4000
ratorwas not w(
7.9
Drking.
50.5
742.54
47.4
Oil Temp 50.1 3.3L Service engine an
Dump with an electric pump for the purposes of testing. Stalled 30 seconds into bag 1 .
le exhaust to
4000
Torgue board vibrated out during bag 2 and was re-inserted during the soak, before the start of bag 3
the back of the
13.9
car. Stalls
45.0
d several t
747.69
mes @ st
30.4
art of test.
Duplicate. RWD, Braking Violations
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84617
84616
84618
84620
84621
84623
84626
84622
84628
84635
84630
84629
84755
84761
84764
84763
84757
84754
84749
84748
84747
84654
84634
84633
84637
84639
84642
84643
84640
84644
84648
84646
84649
84650
84653
84655
84659
84662
84656
84658
84660
84667
84661
84666
84665
84663
84670
BKI Vehicle Info
1997 Chevrolet Suburban
1 999 Plymouth Voyager
1 992 Plymouth Voyager
1992 Ford Ranger PU
1992 Ford Ranger PU
1989 Plymouth Acclaim
I987 Dodge D1 00 PU
1999 Toyota Camry
2002 Chevrolet Trailblazer
1989 Ford Crown Vic
1989 Honda Accord
1996AcuraTL2.5
2002 Honda Odyssey
2004 Kia Sedona
202GMB
2003 Honda Odyssey
2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee
303 Chrysler Town & Count
2001 Toyota Sienna
2002 Dodge Caravan
2003 Dodge Caravan
190 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cier
1988 Plymouth Voyager
1987 Volvo 740 Turbo
0 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supre
1995 Cheverolet Cavalier
1989 Dodge Spirit
1987 Ford Escort
1 994 Ford Explorer
2001 Nissan Pathfinder
1987 Dodge Dakota PU
1988 Honda Accord
1 995 GMC Sonoma PU
1990 Chevrolet Lumina APV
1977 Chevrolet C-20 PU
90 Buick Electra ParkAven
1988 Chrysler Le Baron
1990 Cadillac Eldorado
1 990 Chevrolet Lumina AP\y
1 989 Chevrolet Astrovan
1 988 Dodge Caravan
1982 Ford F250 PU
1990 Buick Century
1988 Ford F1 50 PU
1989 Toyota 4X4 PU
1989 Chevrolet Corsica
1989 Mercury Topaz
Dyne Test
Date
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/07/2005
03/08/2005
03/08/2005
03/08/2005
03/09/2005
03/10/2005
03/09/2005
03/09/2005
04/05/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/05/2005
04/05/2005
04/04/2005
04/04/2005
04/04/2005
03/15/2005
03/10/2005
03/10/2005
03/10/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/11/2005
03/12/2005
03/12/2005
03/12/2005
03/14/2005
03/14/2005
03/14/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/16/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/15/2005
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/16/2005
03/17/2005
BKI Odo
145147
113389
154297
19758
13586
164203
23200
64134
77758
62847
139963
117642
60753
16609
0
44752
90011
20787
80227
60790
0
97522
162874
248178
79420
140500
139488
12845
98974
66284
112838
209194
56578
136313
37697
169860
117003
185384
123632
215908
61439
85513
148959
14075
262316
98999
6137
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
5500
4000
4000
3500
3500
3000
3500
3500
4500
3500
2750
3500
4500
5000
0
4500
4000
4500
4000
4500
0
3000
4000
3000
3500
2750
3000
2500
4000
4000
3500
2750
3500
3500
4000
3500
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3000
4000
3500
3000
2750
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
11.2
7.2
7.5
11.3
11.1
6.9
13.2
6.4
10.0
11.0
6.0
8.1
12.7
10.7
0.0
12.4
11.7
8.9
9.4
9.3
0.0
5.4
7.8
9.9
10.5
4.8
8.4
7.4
10.6
15.3
10.6
6.4
9.8
8.1
13.9
6.3
8.3
6.2
8.1
12.0
8.0
11.9
6.8
14.6
10.9
5.3
6.6
Ambient
Temp (F)
53.1
52.9
50.6
51.8
52.8
41.1
46.2
37.4
37.9
56.5
40.4
38.9
69.1
62.9
29.3
65.4
68.2
67.0
68.0
66.1
63.6
45.6
51.9
47.8
59.7
45.6
55.0
58.5
48.7
49.7
65.7
60.7
40.2
42.5
50.2
49.4
55.5
47.8
52.0
54.8
55.6
57.8
44.3
56.4
54.9
51.4
55.9
Pbaro
(mmHg)
741 .51
740.73
742.10
742.13
742.04
746.94
746.51
746.91
748.31
742.90
749.17
748.78
740.09
742.53
750.53
742.93
740.38
739.87
742.13
742.14
742.20
750.83
743.07
742.83
742.03
746.05
743.18
741 .78
745.64
737.03
737.65
737.26
750.38
750.33
749.00
750.83
749.31
749.61
750.75
749.67
749.00
746.60
749.69
747.24
747.72
749.05
744.46
RH (%)
46.5
47.8
47.7
42.1
35.1
39.1
35.5
45.9
44.0
33.1
36.1
38.6
54.7
62.5
50.1
56.1
50.0
58.3
37.3
36.9
36.9
28.7
43.8
46.9
23.7
33.5
29.7
24.2
32.4
42.3
24.2
31.4
43.9
38.7
27.1
26.0
23.7
48.7
25.2
24.0
23.6
22.8
50.7
28.3
34.2
42.8
27.3
Test Comments
5.7L
oil temp 55.6F
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
Ambient
Temp (F)
Pbaro
(mmHg)
RH (%)
Test Comments
LA92 cold start linked to the Nreel tests, 4761 8, 2061 8 and 21 61 8
oil temp 49.7. Cracked exhaust manifold. Stalled several times © start
3.0L 5 speed
No dyne test
No dyne test
aftest.
Front tire had a knot and a bent rim. Rotated the tire to the fear of the car.2.2L
42.4 Oil temp. RWD braking violations
oil Temp 40.9
oil temp. 40.7 The 2002 tables listed this vehicle at 5500 pounds with no
5.0L oil temp 49.1 RWD braking Violations
2.0L oil temp 39.5
oiltemp42F2.5L
No dyne test
OILTEMP=67.1
OILTEMP=64.9 Realtime filter heater
Previously tested on 2/23/05.
Oil Temp = 64.4
OILTEMP=67.4
OILTEMP=66.1
Oil Temp = 63 F
Oil Temp = 63F
QIO21 1 , Wrong driving trace used.
off
hp value.
This seem
ed like a very
OIL TEMP 47.1/REAL TIME COMPUTER HAD INTERNAL ERROR AT 10 MINUTE SOAK, 684wfs
3.0L oil temp 44.2
oil temp 44.6. 2.3L
RWD Braking Violations.
oil temp 44.7 2.2L 5spd.
2.5L oil temp = ambient
1.9L.
oil temp 44.8. 4.0L
oil Temp 49.5
3.9L oil temp is ambient. Stalled several times @ s
2.0L 53. 7F oil temp. BKG HC instrument is drifting
OIL TEMP 41.1
No dyne test
OIL TEMP 41 .4
art up.
OIL TEMP 41 .9/ADDED 1 QUART OIL/ DEAD BATTERY JUMP STARTED
OIL TEMP 47.4 I I
OIL TEMP 51 .3/IDLES HIGH | |
OIL TEMP 47.4/SERVICE ENGINE SOON LIGHT/EXHAUST LEAK-SMELL ONLY
OIL TEMP 47.8
OIL TEMP 49.0/IDLES HIGH/ WILL NOT STOP /EXHAUST SMELL-LEAKS
OIL TEMP 50.2
leaw inertia fo
OIL TEMP 50.0/ ENGINE STALLS AT IDLE/ RESTARTED NUMEROUS TIMES/SMELLED EXHAUST IN BUILDING
OIL TEMP 47.1
OIL TEMP 49.7
OIL TEMP 49.4
OIL TEMP 46.4/EXHAUST PIPE OIL COVERED-SMOKED BUILDING F
OILTEMP=51.8 DEAD BATTERY ODOMETER DEAD
OR FIRST 600 SECONDS
a Trailbla
er on our
vno.
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84672
84669
84735
84674
84668
84673
84676
84679
84677
84680
84687
84686
84683
84685
84682
84690
84694
84693
84692
84689
84699
84700
84696
84777
84706
84707
84701
84705
84702
84703
84708
84709
84710
84714
84717
84715
84743
84720
84719
84732
84723
84724
84727
84726
84729
84728
84738
84737
84740
84745
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
Ambient
Temp (F)
Pbaro
mmHg)
RH (%)
1983 Toyota Tercel 03/17/2005 87900 2250 6.7 58.3 743.46 24.1
1990 Dodge Spirit 03/17/2005 109931 3000 8.7 53.0 745.06 30.7
1988 Honda Accord 03/30/2005 209393 2750 6.4 63.1 734.47 47.4
1 979 Pontiac Firebird 03/17/2005 45370 4000 10.8 60.7 742.27 20.1
1991 Oldsmobile Delta 88 03/17/2005 139412 3500 7.0 48.9 745.21 37.3
1983GMCVandura 03/17/2005 52728 4500 16.2 60.5 742.25 21.4
1990 Ford Bronco 03/18/2005 25202 4500 13.3 54.8 740.59 25.6
1983 Toyota PU 03/18/2005 97635 3000 9.9 60.5 739.42 25.4
1 988 Buick Park Avenue 03/18/2005 146833 3500 6.3 57.9 740.38 24.1
1973 Chevrolet PU 03/18/2005 57484 4000 12.6 62.1 739.03 24.2
1976 Chevrolet El Camino 03/19/2005 61809 4000 12.1 49.9 747.29 3.2
1986 Ford F1 50 PU 03/19/2005 94737 3500 12.5 49.3 747.12 14.1
1990 Ford Ranger PU 03/19/2005 72976 3500 11.1 45.5 747.52 39.4
1988 Ford F1 50 PU 03/19/2005 62947 4000 13.5 46.9 747.88 22.6
1990 Toyota Camry 03/19/2005 138235 3500 9.0 43.1 747.45 33.1
189 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cier 03/21/2005 220970 3000 5.4 55.2 744.56 38.3
1983 Chevrolet C10PU 03/21/2005 98799 3500 14.0 52.1 742.69 51.9
1988 Ford F1 50 PU 03/21/2005 97172 4000 14.6 54.7 743.13 43.3
1988 Buick Century 03/21/2005 94555 3000 6.4 55.8 743.01 35.3
1992 GMC Jimmy 03/21/2005 90871 3500 9.5 54.2 744.37 38.2
1985 Chevrolet Caprice 03/22/2005 58223 3500 8.7 42.6 742.84 71.1
1978 Ford PU 03/22/2005 73447 4000 11.7 40.8 742.76 72.9
1987 Toyota PU 03/22/2005 169293 2750 9.6 42.2 742.84 67.7
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass 04/08/2005 87020 3500 9.6 63.8 745.59 29.3
'76 Chevrolet Nova/ 144MG 03/23/2005 86094 3500 9.6 48.6 745.29 52.7
1973 Chevrolet Impala 03/23/2005 94178 4000 11.4 48.6 745.22 52.8
1990 Ford F1 50 PU 03/23/2005 38803 4000 13.5 40.2 745.58 66.9
1980 Chevrolet Malibu 03/23/2005 31253 3500 9.5 48.1 745.03 54.2
1989 Chevrolet G20 Van
1987 Chevrolet Blazer
2003 Dodge Caravan
1989 Ford Ranger PU
1984 Chevrolet Monte Carli
1994 Saturn SW
1979 Ford Mustang
1988 Mazda B2200 PU
1999 Mazda Protoge
1989 Chevrolet 1 500 PU
0 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supra
1979 Jeep CJ76
1991 Chevrolet Cavalier
)90 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cie
1982 Ford Grenada
1 990 Ford Aerostar
2001 Toyota Camry
2002 Ford Escape 2wd
1976 Pontiac Gran Prix
1984 Chevrolet Celebrity
1990 Buick Lesabre
1990 Honda Civic
03/23/2005
03/23/2005
03/24/2005
03/24/2005
03/24/2005
03/25/2005
03/25/2005
03/25/2005
04/01/2005
03/26/2005
03/26/2005
03/29/2005
03/28/2005
03/28/2005
03/28/2005
03/28/2005
03/29/2005
03/29/2005
03/30/2005
03/30/2005
03/31/2005
04/02/2005
27435
153398
10200
28864
68810
132333
45551
220307
122968
140678
85449
8518
182349
171475
64654
19648
46869
36209
60909
64091
107876
133966
4000
3500
4000
3000
3500
2500
3000
3000
2750
4000
3500
3000
2750
3000
3500
3500
3500
3500
4500
3000
3500
2250
16.2
9.8
7.2
11.1
10.6
6.1
9.7
10.6
6.9
12.8
4.5
10.6
5.8
5.4
10.6
10.3
6.7
7.5
10.7
6.7
6.8
4.6
41.2
43.7
46.0
47.0
48.2
43.2
42.8
43.2
52.4
43.6
42.7
70.6
54.7
58.8
66.5
64.4
64.6
62.5
58.2
59.5
51.6
50.2
746.52
746.69
745.06
744.44
743.97
746.36
746.15
746.83
749.92
749.84
749.79
736.57
742.79
742.41
740.90
741 .52
737.61
737.41
736.55
735.84
747.48
750.04
64.8
60.9
60.0
60.4
59.3
71.4
71.0
72.6
42.3
59.9
62.0
37.1
43.2
35.3
26.5
29.1
41.5
43.4
50.7
49.5
48.7
38.5
Test Comments
OLIL TEMP=51 .9 EXHAUST LEAKS
OIL TEMP=49.0 ANOTHER VEHICLE
2.0L Oil Temp Ambient
OILTEMP=51.8
OILTEMP=48.9
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
BKI Vehicle Info
STARTED I
OIL TEMP=52.0 WILL NOT EXCEED 50 MPH
OIL TEMP 54.8/ POOR BRAKING!!!!
OIL TEMP=56.6 4 SPEED MAUNAL
No dyne test
OILTEMP=56.4
BUILDING
OIL TEMP=58.9 EXHAUST LEAKS NEW MUFFLER
No dyne test
OIL TEMP 44.3 / RH BATTERY DEAC
OIL TEMP 44.6 / EXHAUST LEAKS / POOR BRAKING
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
OIL TEMP 46.9 / MUFFLER ERMOVED / EXHAUST LEAK AT TRANSFER TUBE PORT ON TUNNEL "BRAIDED LINE-
OIL TEMP 46.9
OIL TEMP 47.9
NOTABLE TO OPEN HOOD /NO OIL
84695
Oldsmobile Cutlass
OIL TEMP 54.3 / COOLANT LIGHT CAME ON AT 1200 SECONDS
OIL TEMP 54.3/EXHAUST LEAKS/ENGINE SKIPS INTERMITTENTLY,
NOT ABLE TO OPEN HOOD/ EXHAUST SMELL
OIL TEMP 54.4 / EXHAUST LEAKS UNDER VEHICLE
13/22/200!
STARTED
220989
aiSOOSE
OIL TEMP=44.4/NO BAG DATA/HAD "QBE RESTARTED MANY TIMES/VIN* DOESN'T MA
OIL TEMP=41 .5/PIPE CUTOFF AND £
OIL TEMP=46.2 EXHAUST LEAKS/ [
Exhaust Leaks
VOID RUN/ CAR OVERHEATED AT 4
OILTEMP=48.6 REPEATED STARTS
OILTEMP=49.4 POOR BRAKING
OIL TEMP=46.8 IDLES HIGH
OILTEMP=46.4
ILL LEAKS/ DEAD BATTERY/ JUMP STARTED
IAD BATTERY/ JUMP STARTED
84712
WONT RUI
1979 Chevrolet Nov;
COLD
OIL TEMP=49.4 POOR BRAKING/EXHAUST LEAKS
13/24/200!
86117
VEHICLE LICENSED AS 94 MERCURYVILLAGER PREVIOUSLY/OIL TEMP 50.4/TRACTIO
OIL TEMP 48.6
OIL TEMP 48.4 /AT BAG I STRONG EXHAUST SMELL /HIGH HC SCO BACKGROUNDS
OILTEMP49.4
3000
CONDS
"CH/POOR E
3500
M CONTROL
5.4
RAKING
9.6
URNEDOFF/
OIL TEMP 46.4 /COMPUTER ERRORED DURING BAGI-SOLENOIDS STILL WORKED, BAG DATAONLY, 109ajw
No dyne test
OIL TEMP 45.9 / MASSIVE EXHAUST LEAK AT CATALYST, ANDREW KNEW /CHECK ENGINE LIGHT ON
1.6L 5Spd Oil Temp 56
OIL TEMP 46.6 / POOR REAR BRAKING
OIL TEMP 46.7
RWD 4.2L oil temp Ambient . Manual trans
2.2L Oil temp not available. The dipstick could not be removed easily.
3.3LOilTemp53.9 I
3.3L Oil temp 60.8 RWD poor braking performance)
3.0L Oil Temp 58.5. RWD poor braking performance
No dyne test I
2.2L Oil Temp 62.2 eng code 1TYXV02.2JJA
3.0L oil temp 60.9. Load tables did not st a 2wd Escape. Used best guess for load and inertia settings, en
5.7L Oil Temp 58.9 same as ambient RWD poor braking
Ambient
Temp (F)
42.4
48.8
-------
BKI Dyne Test Information, First Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
84751
84765
84758
84760
84759
84753
84772
84768
84771
84766
84775
84773
84767
84770
84774
84081
84114
84143
84177
84187
84218
84259
84290
84348
84360
84374
84387
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
BKI Vehicle Info
1998 Ford Escort
1985 Chevrolet Impala
979 Chevrolet C10 Beauvill
2004 Ford Escape
2005 Ford Focus
2003 Dodge Caravan
1992 Dodge Caravan
1995 Ford F1 50 PU
1 994 Chevrolet Astrovan
2000 Dodge Caravan
1997 Chevrolet Suburban
1998 Toyota 4Runner
1998 Nissan Frontier PU
1995 Ford F250 PU
1995 Dodge Caravan
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
I988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
1988 Ford Taurus
Dyne Test
Date
04/04/2005
04/06/2005
04/05/2005
04/06/2005
04/06/2005
04/05/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/08/2005
04/08/2005
04/07/2005
04/07/2005
04/08/2005
07/26/2004
8/02/2004
08/07/2004
08/14/2004
08/1 8/2004
08/25/2004
09/08/2004
09/14/2004
09/24/2004
09/27/2004
09/29/2004
10/01/2004
01/22/2005
01/26/2005
01/31/2005
02/05/2005
02/11/2005
02/14/2005
02/22/2005
03/03/2005
03/08/2005
03/14/2005
03/22/2005
03/31/2005
BKI Odo
55309
75914
84025
10519
6701
47649
143971
147342
133318
93162
137630
115768
107615
52586
136837
13139
13158
13170
13189
13208
13239
13250
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
13729
13748
13768
13788
13809
13828
13871
13936
14013
14033
14052
14072
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
2750
4000
4000
3500
3000
4500
4000
4500
4000
4000
5000
4000
3500
4500
4000
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
3500
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
6.0
11.1
14.6
10.4
11.7
7.9
7.0
11.6
12.3
10.0
10.8
11.7
11.0
11.6
7.6
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Ambient
Temp (F)
72.3
66.2
68.9
61.8
60.2
66.0
56.7
56.2
56.4
56.8
60.0
50.0
56.5
56.9
55.6
76.4
93.5
81.5
74.1
77.4
81.0
72.0
87.7
79.6
77.6
73.7
72.0
24.9
43.9
40.2
58.9
51.7
54.0
43.8
51.9
44.6
46.1
42.6
53.9
Pbaro
(mmHg)
741 .07
742.96
740.45
742.50
742.14
739.62
747.26
747.25
747.71
746.02
746.61
746.91
746.97
747.56
747.01
748.47
743.15
745.40
749.96
743.43
741 .43
749.29
741 .85
748.58
747.21
746.84
743.77
756.08
749.90
752.20
747.32
750.85
744.13
752.08
746.87
747.22
750.16
742.97
748.14
RH (%)
35.9
53.9
49.1
68.6
73.3
59.6
64.1
63.7
64.5
64.8
40.1
72.9
64.2
63.4
60.3
40.6
45.0
38.2
35.0
54.2
60.8
47.9
39.0
26.8
51.5
17.5
14.1
41.1
50.6
69.6
27.1
1.2
49.7
55.9
40.9
35.0
34.2
69.4
43.0
Test Comments
Oil Temp = 67 F
BKI Dyne Test Information, Second Dyne Run
Dyne Run
Number
BKI Vehicle Info
Dyne Test
Date
BKI Odo
Test Inertia
(Lbs)
Test HP
(@ 50 MPH)
OILTEMP=64.2 Exhaust manifold repared before testing Poor braking Exhaust leaks Service engine soon light on
OIL TEMP= could not get
OIL TEMP= 65.7 Realtime filter heater off
OIL TEMP=65.4 Realtime filter heater off
OILTEMP=66.1
Fluids (coolant and trans fluid) toppec
Oil Temp = 57.4
0
0
0
Oil Temp = 55.2
Oil Temp = 58.3
No Brakes, Oil Temp = 56.8
0
No dyne test
No dyne test
No dyne test
No dyne test
No dyne test
No dyne test
Control Vehicle
Control Vehicle
Control Vehicle
Control Vehicle
Control vehicle, vorgue Zero drifting.
Control vehicle
Control Vehicle
Control Vehicle. Ran a second flow m
Control Vehicle
Control Vehicle
Control Vehicle
Control Vehicle
Control vehicle. Dyno noise continues
Control Vehicle
Corellation Vehicle. The fan that exha
Correlation Vehicle
3f.
V deo failure @950 sec into bag I
. Vviolation while repairing cable.
3ter behind our normal flow meter. Two of the Semtech
© a certian roll speed.
sts the building and the tunnel gases was n
OIL TEMP 41 .9 / CO-RELATION VEHICLE/ BAGS LEFT ON EVACUAT
Correlation VEHICLE/OIL TEMP 44.2 / GAS SMELL FROM VEHICLE
No oil temp. I I
Correlation Vehicle I I
Correlation vehicle. 'Oil temp 42.4. The CO2 value for bag 3 was curio
CORRELATION VEHICLE/OIL TEMP 41 .0
OILTEMP=49.6
Correlation Vehicle
i FOR BA
sly not rec
t on this m
3I&II
orded. Don
devices were
oming. This
t know why.
sampling from
robably accoun
Simple omission
Ambient
Temp (F)
le exhaus
tsfortheh
Pbaro
(mmHg)
before it v
gher back
RH (%)
rent into th
grounds in
Test Comments
e transfer tube.
jag 2.
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
| 7/13/2004
value
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/13/2004
7/14/2004
7/14/2004
7/14/2004
7/15/2004
7/15/2004
7/16/2004
7/16/2004
7/17/2004
7/17/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/19/2004
7/20/2004
7/1 9/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/23/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/22/2004
7/24/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/26/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG04
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
760
667
316
781
307
1773
1845
1687
1804
601
1661
1750
315
510
1804
1682
1861
1418
724
1765
1600
1943
1865
1057
592
503
909
1691
857
1805
494
1608
786
1749
1800
216
401
974
603
1302
310
1355
374
525
215
320
Battery
Voltage
(V)
10.7
11.8
13.1
11.9
12
11.8
12.8
12.8
13.4
12.4
12.7
12.2
12.8
11.1
12.7
11.7
13
12.2
13.2
11.9
13.5
12.7
13.1
13.4
13.2
11.3
11.7
12
12.1
13.5
12
11.5
11.5
12.1
11.4
11.6
12.6
11.6
11.2
11.7
13.2
11
12.3
12.9
11.6
12.5
Ambient
Temp ( C)
99.3 F
96.6
82.9
98.4
79.5
84.4
82.2
27.3
27.3
24.9
31.4
26
25.4
33
25
32
32
36.5
28
34.6
27
36.5
27.1
31.6
34.4
32.9
32
29.8
32.3
29.6
26.9
27
27.1
24.4
18.4
18.9
29.7
27
28.1
26.1
27.9
25.3
27.9
27.9
23.8
27.8
RH (%)
44
45
69
41
61
50
51
58
60
78
60
62
64
48
62
53
52
45
75
43
75
47
61
55
52
56
58
65
53
69
67
69
64
52
75
75
75
40
40
45
41
46
41
41
57
41
FID Oven
Tempi C)
191
193
195
196
195
193
193
193
193
195
193
193
193
192
196
194
195
197
196
103
193
196
194
194
193
193
196
195
195
196
193
193
195
192
192
195
192
192
195
195
192
193
195
192
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
5
4
4
3
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
4
6
4
5
1
0
4
5
6
5
6
5
7
6
4
5
5
5
5
4
3
5
5
4
3
5
5
4
6
3
Amb. P
997
976
989
986
991
988
980
979
985
975
974
989
980
980
P1 (mbar)
865
904
900
853
914
860
910
876
859
905
902
897
910
875
874
856
856
861
899
846
894
867
856
854
856
882
874
855
864
860
863
883
882
851
890
888
872
885
886
877
864
886
875
866
884
940
P2 (mbar)
940
938
935
934
949
950
936
935
940
932
936
933
935
930
935
935
938
939
927
929
941
929
931
941
919
939
929
936
943
938
941
942
937
932
962
949
949
946
939
950
940
942
903
942
940
921
P3 (mbar)
940
931
933
939
937
879
923
932
935
928
932
927
933
917
931
934
93
935
931
930
932
925
937
930
931
940
927
936
940
935
942
941
921
935
922
946
873
947
891
905
1017
907
896
997
939
987
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM035327
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
Span Gas #
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALMO60885
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
Comments
Span gas # correct?
FID Pres -bottle rplcd
I
OBDII protocol - try VPV
OBDII protocol - try VPV
OBDII protocol- try VP\y
Vehicle would disconne'
OBDII protocol - try VPV
Untestable
OBDII protocol - change
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
8/2/2004
7/29/2004
7/30/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/29/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/29/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/11/2004
8/3/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
gl 8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/7/2004
8/7/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG07
H03-SG01
H03-SG05
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
399
1068
1848
1390
524
1526
1393
691
1919
1697
1502
1671
355
845
1745
730
1758
472
638
1693
9.8
1206
1169
885
314
1065
1660
269
1398
1501
1219
1008
1737
779
802
1319
1840
1542
1071
1787
1714
1286
626
640
1149
944
353
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.5
12.6
13.2
12.6
12.1
13.3
12.6
12.1
12.5
11.6
12.5
12.5
12.3
12.9
12.5
12.8
12.1
11.9
12
11.7
12.9
11.2
12.9
12.6
13.1
12.5
12.9
12.4
12.2
13.2
13.1
13.3
13.4
11.6
12.2
121
12.5
12.5
12.3
12.4
12
12.9
12.6
13.5
11.7
12.4
13.2
Ambient
Temp ( C)
27.1
26.8
24.4
25.9
27
25.6
25.9
25.9
34.6
23.9
35.4
32.9
28.1
26.6
25.4
28.1
28
28
34.8
28
27.6
26.7
23.9
36.5
32.4
35.8
23.1
29.9
28
28.8
28
27.6
29.9
25.4
29.3
28.5
24.3
26.8
25.3
26.6
23.6
31.9
24.6
RH (%)
55
51
56
51
54
68
56
65
55
61
54
57
53
56
59
64
63.7
63
54
74
55
51
61
52
55
52
42
68
73
76
73
75
69
49
41
42
45
37
43
44
56
46
53
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
195
193
193
196
193
193
196
193
193
196
193
196
193
193
193
192
195
193
193
192
195
193
194
196
196
193
193
195
195
195
195
193
195
195
196
196
196
190
193
193
196
196
193
193
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
5
5
5
2
5
6
3
6
5
3
5
8
5
7
5
5
3
5
5
5
8
7
6
3
6
5
5
2
3
3
3
7
3
3
3
4
4
5
7
6
4
3
5
5
5
Amb. P
979
25.8
975
978
974
983
975
976
974
982
975
972
973
971
978
983
982
983
994
993
994
991
989
996
979
982
981
981
P1 (mbar)
873
874
880
875
887
832
1026
891
901
1021
870
856
916
858
890
879
876
878
867
870
926
876
859
882
862
901
846
878
869
856
857
859
856
93
913
868
910
909
860
913
925
923
909
906
882
871
907
P2 (mbar)
933
926
937
930
921
925
929
521
939
868
928
929
923
933
910
904
934
934
946
926
870
928
934
931
908
945
924
935
931
928
903
939
930
925
951
945
944
940
936
960
940
927
939
941
934
948
953
P3 (mbar)
883
889
928
872
931
919
904
932
934
870
900
901
929
1010
931
881
932
932
942
925
922
890
929
932
845
950
926
896
927
870
872
947
948
926
962
911
913
942
932
936
937
930
943
934
936
942
918
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
ALM042257
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM035327
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
ALM042257
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
Span Gas #
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
Comments
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
8/9/2004
r 8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/7/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
8/10/2004
8/10/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/11/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/14/2004
8/1 3/2004
8/12/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/16/2004
8/16/2004
8/18/2004
8/1 6/2004
8/17/2004
8/17/2004
8/17/2004
8/14/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/19/2004
8/19/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/24/2004
8/25/2004
8/25/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
103-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG04
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1350
1896
688
603
247
1887
701
1003
1203
490
583
866
1413
1725
955
1242
1862
347
692
1432
630
1766
792
1603
1853
1027
646
1764
335
1019
717
323
1797
417
1173
1371
1766
575
453
948
675
841
1740
1301
1782
1356
496
1718
1690
834
Battery
Voltage
(V)
13
11.8
12.9
12
13.1
131
12.1
11.6
12.8
11.7
11.6
12.5
11.7
12.5
11.7
12.7
11.8
12.7
12
11.4
12.7
12.2
12.5
12.7
12
12.2
12.6
12.6
12.3
12.7
12.1
12.6
12.3
12.7
11.7
12.5
12.8
12.7
12.8
13.1
12.3
13.2
13
12.1
12.1
13.2
12.4
12.1
12.5
Ambient
Temp ( C)
24.6
29
28.8
27.9
24.8
22.1
27.4
20.9
23.4
21.9
18.8
20.6
19.6
26.4
23.9
19.4
24.8
23.9
22.6
22.8
22.8
34.3
22.4
25.4
25.4
26.9
31.6
35
28.9
22.6
20.9
22.1
19.4
18.4
18.6
23.9
22.9
19.1
24.5
24.9
24.9
25.5
24.1
23.9
29
30.9
RH (%)
64
56
55
48
46
51
40
59
41
42
65
46
64
37
47
64
40
49
53
65
5
36
52
65
65
63
45
32
53
44
46
57
74
78
88
65
66
86
89
89
89
87
70
73
68
FID Oven
Tempi C)
178
193
193
193
196
194
194
196
193
193
191
193
193
193
193
187
193
193
193
193
191
193
193
193
186
193
192
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
196
195
193
195
195
193
180
197
193
190
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
6
5
3
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
6
5
4
5
7
5
5
6
6
5
4
6
5
5
5
6
5
6
6
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
3
5
4
4
5
5
3
4
7
5
Amb. P
982
983
988
979
993
981
983
991
984
983
983
984
988
984
984
992
986
986
988
992
988
985
990
974
985
980
984
979
974
972
975
981
982
980
-32
979
983
982
980
979
984
973
972
975
974
983
977
971
978
P1 (mbar)
909
913
922
911
906
913
856
850
911
881
870
926
881
876
927
883
917
883
886
918
880
928
974
915
875
921
904
864
898
904
908
908
910
877
906
910
910
911
866
914
904
860
904
903
898
903
839
864
P2 (mbar)
919
937
1016
937
937
936
871
868
935
936
889
942
948
893
936
940
931
938
963
1023
937
939
972
255
938
943
931
920
923
930
930
932
936
908
946
940
931
944
945
940
910
935
924
928
922
909
856
929
P3 (mbar)
945
935
701
934
937
893
876
888
893
929
886
935
896
905
917
885
936
916
943
942
889
928
957
553
946
949
942
927
871
927
885
892
929
847
934
926
906
938
916
949
918
894
904
873
896
925
835
925
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
ALM042257
ALM042257
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM066169
ALM066169
Span Gas #
Comments
Could not SEMTECH te
PEMS-only (all-whee dr
RH(%)-OutofrangeHi
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
8/26/2004
8/25/2004
8/27/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/25/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
rt 9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/8/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
HC3-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
HOC-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG01
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG06
H03-SG04
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG04
H03-SG05
H03-SG04
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG06
H03-SG05
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1572
1595
289
1799
1442
1196
475
1219
738
1829
498
1389
865
905
1472
430
1168
1265
364
1658
1216
570
790
772
1773
590
1776
1334
1145
1804
1779
1849
1828
1010
680
242
509
502
1805
737
1494
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.8
11.8
11.9
12.2
12.6
11.7
12.3
12.2
12.2
12.7
12.3
12.4
12.3
12.8
12.7
13.4
12.9
12.4
12.7
12.4
12.7
12.6
12.8
12.7
12.9
12.6
12.4
13
13
13.5
12.7
12.8
12.1
12.9
12.5
12.8
12.9
12.5
13
13
13.6
Ambient
Temp ( C)
27.8
30.3
27.6
25.9
34.5
26.4
27.5
30.8
34.1
30.6
27.6
31.9
23.9
24.9
22
27.4
73
20.6
27.3
21.1
24.1
25.6
23.6
29.6
23.9
31
22.8
27.4
24.1
27
26.5
26.8
26
23.3
23.4
22.4
18.9
26.9
28
28.9
19.9
RH (%)
77
72
77
87
54
83
77
64
56
62
77
59
73
65
84
57
23
74
51
70
59
57
61
50
67
44
80
60
64
54
57
56
36
46
49
52
73
43
41
37
69
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
194
193
188
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
194
193
193
194
193
193
193
194
193
193
194
194
194
194
194
194
194
19
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
5
5
6
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
5
5
6
5
6
4
6
7
5
5
5
5
4
6
4
4
6
5
6
Amb. P
972
972
975
972
976
977
978
972
970
982
975
986
979
978
979
979
982
982
989
990
982
983
993
985
992
992
986
991
986
993
987
986
992
989
991
990
987
988
990
990
P1 (mbar)
866
900
869
901
889
904
894
864
863
854
859
868
901
857
902
858
859
868
861
902
903
863
863
864
907
954
906
862
916
906
865
920
915
904
914
863
903
915
900
860
903
P2 (mbar)
936
921
940
936
895
930
910
923
921
907
937
916
929
919
941
925
935
947
926
939
943
926
928
941
935
968
949
939
937
933
947
947
943
947
925
886
905
910
944
892
891
P3 (mbar)
900
915
921
926
901
942
926
879
878
883
932
895
934
920
925
923
919
931
927
937
845
926
923
932
937
987
940
927
930
931
941
943
939
936
906
899
934
883
911
936
916
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
No PEM
Info not collected by M»
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
9/10/2004
9/11/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/13/2004
9/14/2004
9/13/2004
9/14/2004
ir 9/13/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
cy 9/15/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/20/2004
9/17/2004
9/17/2004
9/17/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/17/2004
9/18/2004
9/29/2004
9/18/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG04
H03-SG05
H03-SG04
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
549
1079
1447
1056
1705
1807
315
801
1648
1467
281
917
1534
1785
353
1511
429
797
1052
1730
796
1287
1426
1575
593
644
625
1314
1600
965
1375
1715
525
1174
1259
1010
959
429
722
787
1406
873
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.1
12.3
13
12.5
12
12.5
11.8
12.6
12.4
12.3
13
12
12.9
12.1
12.7
13
12.2
12
13.4
12.3
13
12.6
13
11.9
12.5
11.9
12.8
12.7
13
12.2
12.4
12.7
11.8
12.9
11.8
12.7
12.8
12.8
12
12.5
12.9
Ambient
Temp ( C)
30.1
27.3
25.1
29.6
29.8
26.9
23.9
31.9
25.9
25.4
31
27.9
23.9
24.9
24.9
29.9
25.9
24.5
23.6
20
27.9
27.9
24.4
25.6
27.9
23.1
24.5
22.4
20
22.8
31.1
17.1
20.1
15.3
26.1
22
231
37.1
31
25
24.5
34.5
RH (%)
37
44
51
36
49
66
58
44
55
70
52
57
High
74
75
60
76
88
High
66
32
33
49
42
40
50
47
49
86
73
47
77
31
61
65
46
43
24.5
25
40
53
38.4
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
194
194
193
194
193
194
194
193
193
196
193
194
194
194
193
193
194
193
194
194
194
113
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
192
194
194
194
193
194
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
5
6
7
5
6
5
7
6
5
7
2
4
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
7
5
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
5
7
5
6
6
7
5
7
7
Amb. P
969
984
989
988
967
975
978
976
982
979
972
978
983
971
976
974
975
978
975
981
978
983
981
966
982
985
961
980
986
981
981
980
983
987
986
985
987
985
987
984
987
986
P1 (mbar)
866
881
915
867
867
899
907
900
909
856
893
909
846
893
901
898
904
907
867
906
866
862
905
912
908
865
910
936
913
903
872
905
912
918
865
878
910
883
866
913
913
911
P2 (mbar)
923
944
942
914
930
911
934
895
915
911
952
862
887
929
862
260
848
878
933
927
921
928
938
865
934
867
965
935
938
923
949
949
940
942
817
935
896
857
842
930
846
863
P3 (mbar)
918
941
929
844
927
910
931
871
907
904
917
814
871
917
895
524
826
848
894
911
920
895
876
892
932
828
934
873
908
911
928
868
934
940
761
929
872
865
800
920
884
898
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850 PWM
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
Start THC ~ 5,000
Beginning THC ~ 3000,
Start THC ~ 2,500
Start THC -11, 500
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/27/2004
9/29/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H05-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG06
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1590
1050
259
697
1049
1559
1644
411
1314
1640
939
1235
1711
1085
311
1657
709
956
829
1655
411
739
471
650
1691
1418
952
338
531
1041
421
1318
1715
955
1657
Battery
Voltage
(V)
11.9
11.5
11.9
12.2
12.6
12.8
12.5
12.6
11.6
12.7
11.8
12.5
12.4
11.9
11.8
13
13
12.9
12.8
12.6
11.9
11.9
12.3
11.7
11.6
12.5
12.5
11.6
12.1
12.6
12.9
11.9
12.2
13.1
Ambient
Temp ( C)
28.9
20.8
26.1
27.9
29.4
22.4
21.5
24.1
21.4
27.9
22.6
27.4
17.4
25.6
29.6
28.1
29.1
19.9
19.1
29.9
18.9
23.5
21.6
29.4
19 C
26.2
20.4
20.1
27
22.4
24.9
29.8
21.6
RH (%)
34
58
55.1
50
41
50
63
59
75
32
54
32
71
54.5
40
41
40
78
76
32
80
51
54
34
73
51
58
60
40
63
40
82
30
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
193
194
194
193
193
194
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
194
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
192
193
194
193
193
194
193
193
193
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
5
6
7
5
6
7
5
7
5
7
7
5
5
5
7
7
5
6
6
7
5
5
6
5
6
5
8
5
6
7
6
6
6
6
Amb. P
980
984
984
981
989
982
989
984
982
985
984
989
990
985
987
987
986
987
983
988
990
991
988
988
992
985
984
968
987
987
991
991
990
988
982
988
P1 (mbar)
872
912
876
909
868
908
915
912
909
867
878
868
918
877
916
879
863
866
909
916
870
920
917
880
876
913
875
917
914
867
872
871
918
860
873
915
P2 (mbar)
932
937
945
925
794
934
907
922
931
936
952
902
906
934
938
940
936
917
937
941
929
912
942
940
957
934
931
938
899
895
875
919
953
884
932
940
P3 (mbar)
909
934
927
912
783
931
890
924
925
883
927
913
925
911
944
915
911
902
931
920
937
931
939
926
932
928
929
927
808
896
844
851
916
882
915
913
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Wll not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
C
Zero Gas #
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
Start THC ~ 3,300
Start THC ~ 1 ,500
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/29/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/11/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/12/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/13/2005
1/14/2005
1/15/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/16/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG05
H03-SG06
H03-SG05
H03-SE05
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG06
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-S003
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
C03-SE01
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
546
306
732
1707
655
307
949
1322
1530
1689
1529
1284
1447
1685
1701
996
1030
346
773
643
1349
1631
1474
853
1310
968
1667
1700
990
1212
555
1705
1543
1855
1667
1473
888
575
1669
1482
1736
1135
331
1529
1731
647
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12
12
11.9
12.5
12.8
12.9
12.1
12.8
11.6
12
13.1
13.2
12.9
13.8
13.5
12.6
12.5
12.6
12.5
13.5
12.6
12.9
12.4
12
11.9
12.8
12.5
13.4
12.7
12.8
13.4
12
12.7
13
12.2
12.6
13
13
12.5
12.4
12.4
12.4
12.4
13.6
12.2
Ambient
Temp ( C)
23.9
24.1
20.5
19.4
21.1
23.9
19.2
25.9
24.1
20.1
11.6
11.9
13.5
11.1
5.9
6.9
7.6
8.3
2.1
1.9
4.8
3.6
5
7.9
6.8
-0.1
15.6
12.9
12.1
14.6
16
14.6
18.6
13.4
22.6
14.3
22.1
20.4
20.1
18.1
20
11.9
13.5
12.1
17.4
RH (%)
28
27
39
45
44
44.4
54.2
39.1
29
51
41
47
44
45
61
53
68
68
43
45
40
26
24
25
25
24
20
22
22
20
20
42
20
22
20
23
22
21
24
24
27
41
45
40
25
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
193
194
194
193
193
193
194
193
193
194
193
194
193
193
193
153
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
1700
193
193
193
193
193
193
191
193
193
194
193
193
195
193
195
195
193
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
6
5
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
6
5
4
4
5
3
4
3
3
5
2
3
2
4
2
4
6
4
5
6
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
6
4
5
Amb. P
983
982
986
985
985
983
985
978
981
982
980
984
980
981
984
970
964
102
968
908
984
983
1003
1008
1030
10000
1008
1042
1009
1036
1010
1006
1038
1041
1013
1002
1029
993
1008
1025
1017
1025
1012
1009
935
1019
P1 (mbar)
864
874
880
879
912
909
869
904
865
862
863
901
912
897
913
903
860
892
904
1013
921
919
905
937
893
939
932
884
938
883
940
934
935
936
969
936
885
910
931
920
982
915
976
920
979
886
P2 (mbar)
885
930
938
896
930
931
936
931
929
879
882
936
927
927
930
909
921
880
910
939
952
925
993
919
950
938
957
961
876
965
957
902
945
949
953
916
952
942
914
890
945
885
937
917
987
942
P3 (mbar)
891
907
893
903
836
833
925
911
938
887
892
941
906
1009
923
871
852
838
847
909
877
908
828
900
934
919
934
945
930
954
958
881
931
927
946
907
929
935
920
936
949
889
909
882
936
972
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
C
Zero Gas #
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
icate using ar
ALM050011
ALM050011
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
y of the abov
ALM041307
ALM041307
Span Gas #
e communicat
Comments
Start THC ~ 8,700 ppm
on protocols.
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
R 1/18/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/19/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
ri! 1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
k 1/26/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
sn 1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/28/2005
n 1/27/2005
re 1/27/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
er 1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
2/2/2005
2/1/2005
2/1/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
C03-SG07
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
L04-SE13
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
K03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
C03-SG02
C03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
C03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
879
1719
1025
1388
880
861
1694
1308
1621
1645
867
1581
1294
1031
1628
769
1736
1127
1213
1797
1404
559
1227
1697
1744
1117
777
975
1129
456
1752
583
1740
1392
1737
1706
1414
973
338
768
1468
971
1260
521
566
564
920
290
830
287
1527
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.5
13
12.7
12.3
12.3
12.9
13.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.8
12
12.5
12.4
12.8
12.8
12.5
12.8
12.9
12.5
12.6
12.5
13.5
12.2
12.8
12.5
12.5
12
12.8
13
12.6
12.6
12.5
13
13
13.1
12.5
12.5
12.1
12.3
12.6
12.5
12.6
12.1
12.6
12.3
12.6
12.5
12.5
12.6
Ambient
Temp ( C)
14.6
9
19.8
13.9
12.3
21.1
45.4
13.5
13.5
12.4
22.9
16.4
15.6
6.5
12.6
13.4
20.9
15.6
14.8
20.9
23.1
16.9
17.3
17.9
17.3
16.9
18.9
19.1
19.8
21.8
19.1
20.5
20.8
21
13.8
19.6
13.4
15
9.9
16.4
15.9
8.4
8.6
14.1
10.5
22.9
22.8
193
15.6
22.1
RH (%)
35
56
34
51
53
32
25
31
39
40
25
23
23
22
40
41
28
34
41
28
22
36
30
24
29
30
29
22
27
21
28
30
30
28
50
42
51
37
42
25
37
33
29
30
43
23
23
5
39
31
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
193
193
192
193
194
193
195
193
194
191
195
195
193
193
195
193
193
192
192
191
195
192
191
192
193
194
193
193
193
193
194
195
193
193
193
193
193
192
191
195
195
191
16.6
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
4
5
4
6
4
4
5
6
5
4
6
3
5
3
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
3
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
3
6
4
4
6
35
6
5
4
Amb. P
989
1005
976
963
1012
1006
1013
1008
997
1018
1008
993
1000
1012
991
1006
1012
1008
1001
1021
1023
1014
995
1232
990
1029
993
1022
988
986
1023
1021
992
1022
999
987
990
1025
996
991
992
1004
1018
988
1020
991
1028
1000
990
992
990
1025
P1 (mbar)
918
850
908
908
880
860
902
846
915
873
896
875
966
988
938
875
903
909
857
887
920
867
925
907
888
894
933
906
922
858
912
917
864
900
891
920
920
924
903
841
884
873
885
1022
880
891
921
1026
881
889
886
922
P2 (mbar)
925
878
930
921
739
924
935
874
930
932
918
891
943
944
949
936
933
935
886
939
940
881
941
961
943
952
943
935
944
875
930
933
945
942
940
941
942
935
930
854
956
980
940
921
953
920
954
937
871
944
938
928
P3 (mbar)
911
873
915
847
926
905
923
878
933
923
920
896
940
917
969
892
934
923
917
928
911
904
895
963
934
943
935
926
921
882
931
914
926
922
936
943
932
915
886
860
940
940
856
887
967
894
951
931
925
938
929
945
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850 PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J 1850 PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J 1850 PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
C
Zero Gas #
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM050011
ALM06117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM06117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM06117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM061111
ALM006117
ALM06111
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
Span Gas #
Comments
OBDII -Could not comn
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
2/6/2005
2/8/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/10/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
n 2/11/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
U 2/16/2005
C 2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/1 7/2005
2/18/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
C03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SGOE
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SE08
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1746
412
577
1250
924
1780
1280
1688
1771
1206
1557
852
1224
793
826
285
447
546
1231
538
1694
859
1389
1401
342
608
488
484
1523
445
954
893
1066
1462
931
748
1515
1223
995
712
537
1123
1642
484
1078
409
834
380
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.5
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.7
12.3
12.5
12.4
12.2
12.4
12.5
12.6
12.8
12.6
12.2
12.5
12.2
12.4
12.6
12.7
12.4
12.3
12.4
12.2
12.4
12.6
12.2
12.1
12.9
12.4
13.3
12.5
12.4
13
12.4
12.6
12.7
12.6
13
12.7
12.3
12.3
12.9
13.2
12.5
12.8
12.7
Ambient
Temp ( C)
22.9
25.9
190
10.6
18.6
16.8
16.3
19.6
18.5
16.1
18.1
17
13.9
18.4
12.8
18
18.1
17.5
15.4
18.3
17.9
19.4
19.6
13.9
18.9
10.1
17.1
10.4
21.3
15.1
22.1
15
14.1
17.8
16.5
15
15
17.4
15.4
24
21.3
11
18.1
17.1
9.4
18
10.9
RH (%)
23
23
35
45
32
32
53
28
31
30
30
30
31
31
31
30
30
30
30
23
29
25
22
27
25
30
32
30
25
41
32
44
31
42
45
50
50
27
25
25
28
35
31
32
32
31
25
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
195
191
193
193
193
193
193
195
193
195
195
194
193
195
193
145
195
195
193
195
195
192
193
193
194
195
196
193
193
195
196
193
195
194
195
196
193
194
193
195
193
195
193
195
194
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
5
5
6
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
6
3
4
3
4
5
4
6
4
4
3
3
5
4
7
4
5
4
3
4
3
5
Amb. P
987
999
998
985
985
988
987
985
1017
995
1004
1019
1022
990
1003
986
1004
986
1012
1022
999
1023
1029
997
1029
1010
1001
1001
995
1023
973
972
1008
1001
982
985
985
980
1020
997
987
996
1002
997
1001
996
986
985
991
P1 (mbar)
885
1012
866
886
785
888
857
876
921
876
917
875
912
866
876
858
990
877
901
884
900
919
870
876
918
853
946
875
905
865
875
905
916
943
817
914
914
930
864
824
876
899
946
706
875
903
885
916
891
P2 (mbar)
920
941
941
916
799
938
934
945
940
929
932
957
976
885
943
872
933
945
928
933
937
947
946
968
955
886
935
940
941
955
911
897
872
868
826
912
931
927
902
814
940
903
949
870
940
885
936
932
927
P3 (mbar)
869
937
934
911
804
929
921
937
939
872
881
878
979
930
891
887
872
933
875
925
938
944
940
941
919
811
876
935
873
860
886
900
867
883
791
892
924
919
875
838
942
903
949
951
943
845
927
869
861
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850 PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J 1850 PWM
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J 1 850 VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J 1850 PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J 1850 PWM
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM010867
ALM010867
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
OBDII-?
H04-SE08
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/21/2005
3/11/2005
C 3/17/2005
3/24/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
2/22/2005
3/10/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/24/2005
3/19/2005
3/21/2005
2/26/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
d 3/25/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
3/30/2005
3/1/2005
3/29/2005
3/1/2005
3/2/2005
3/2/2005
3/3/2005
2/3/2005
3/3/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
C03SG01
C03SG02
H03-SG06
H04-SG03
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
C03SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
641
1520
1801
1706
1586
1031
1107
1813
1123
1003
238
1711
1427
388
279
1651
780
1749
1503
409
810
727
388
986
1692
506
1306
1613
263
1519
950
872
586
1604
722
764
1720
1754
558
1812
1774
845
1741
192
1390
1804
1702
1087
1312
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.2
12.6
12.3
12.1
12.4
12.5
12.3
12.7
12.8
12.3
12.5
12.6
12.4
12.4
12.6
12.3
12.2
12.5
12.6
12.8
12.6
12.5
12.7
12.5
12.3
12.3
12.5
12.3
12.4
12.8
128
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.3
13.1
12.4
12.7
12.8
12.5
12.7
12.4
12.7
12.2
12.8
12.5
Ambient
Temp ( C)
20.6
18.4
20.9
21.1
21.6
23
21.9
19
15.1
23.6
17.4
18.9
15.6
27.3
19.1
16.4
23.9
18
19.8
15.3
20.9
12.1
20.3
25.4
17.6
18.9
16.6
14.9
17.8
20.3
22.9
70.3
18.1
19.3
19.4
25
21.6
149
23.9
16.4
22.4
18.6
22
20.8
65
12.1
21.9
19.4
RH (%)
23
21
34
32
35
37
28
22
36
30
34
27
40
25
33
33
22
30
22
31
30
25
28
21
30
30
32
32
30
34
22
21
23
47
23
35
20
26
21
56
24
32
23
32
9.6
62
23
38
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
194
195
195
195
195
196
193
194
195
195
194
194
195
195
195
193
195
195
193
195
193
193
193
195
191
192
193
193
195
193
193
193
193
193
195
193
193
193
195
195
195
193
193
193
194
195
194
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
6
4
4
4
5
4
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
4
6
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
6
5
4
3
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
Amb. P
991
1026
982
996
981
994
980
1017
977
1012
987
1027
996
1026
1008
1021
992
1021
1019
1023
1016
989
1012
983
1018
990
983
985
1020
1015
1016
986
985
979
990
996
973
1016
977
989
988
779
1014
975
977
985
1011
983
1011
P1 (mbar)
886
900
872
917
869
873
845
868
909
865
878
942
903
918
904
887
861
876
863
907
906
901
853
871
864
859
876
875
913
912
869
934
852
869
830
874
844
856
842
902
980
870
909
870
871
887
911
852
888
P2 (mbar)
938
918
943
938
936
932
871
878
913
925
937
924
943
950
934
938
929
935
936
935
934
927
889
972
953
918
918
976
931
933
971
968
909
927
914
940
922
927
859
933
932
943
926
933
926
925
941
905
901
P3 (mbar)
877
925
937
933
872
915
891
909
864
917
887
917
930
914
926
934
908
941
930
918
934
858
888
945
934
917
854
978
911
929
939
968
862
912
902
939
916
915
880
931
929
936
920
881
857
914
881
854
847
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
e using any of the abo\
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850 PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J 1850 PWM
ISO-9141-2
C
Zero Gas #
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM018067
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM042613
ALM010867
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
Flowmeter K04-SE01 ; n
Flowmeter I04-SE03
I04-SE03
Flow I04-SE03; mpg 17
Flow !04-SE03;mpg 20.19!
Flowl04-SE03;mpg17
Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communication protocols.
Vehicle will not commurt ALM01 0867 ALM049099
Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communication protocols.
ISO 9141
Vehicle will not commu
J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J 1850 PWM
Vehicle will not commu
ALM042613
ALM010867
ALM041623
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
F ow I04-SE08; mpg 27 63
Flowmeter I04-SE03, mpg 20.
J04-SE06
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
3/4/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/4/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
3/14/2005
3/9/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/1 0/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/12/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/15/2005
3/1 5/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
C03-SG02
C03-SG01
C03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
366
734
1467
706
347
1609
911
1050
297
1164
422
1011
1756
1743
1144
1415
300
576
952
1529
970
1285
563/194
524
389
700
1757
596
1744
1728
1166
1452
777
1167
1518
1819
987
1791
1437
1119
818
852
474
1460
1756
1135
1821
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.5
12.6
12.8
12.7
12.5
12.5
12.4
12.5
13
12.8
12.4
12.8
12.7
12.8
12.7
12.5
12.8
12.4
12.3
12.9
12.4
13
12.6
12.7
12.4
12.3
12.2
12.6
12.8
12.3
12.6
12.5
12.5
12.3
12.2
12.3
12.3
12.8
12.4
12.3
Ambient
Temp ( C)
21.7
19.8
17.9
14.3
13.3
20.6
13.9
18.6
16.9
25
22.6
25
19.9
21.8
19.9
25.6
27.3
15
16
13.1
21.4
12.8
18.1
20.6
17.4
17.4
16.9
16.9
19.3
13.1
22.4
17.8
23.9
15.9
18.1
10.9
12.9
24.1
12.9
16.4
15.5
11.9
14.4
19.1
RH (%)
27
31
33
37
30
25
40
35
41
22
22
36
68
58
70
34
23
24
24
29
22
24
28
30
25
25
31
31
32
29
24
32
22
27
30
31
32
22
25
26
26
24
26
33
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
195
193
194
193
196
195
193
191
194
194
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
195
193
194
195
194
194
193
194
195
194
193
195
193
195
194
195
193
195
195
193
195
195
194
195
194
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
4
3
3
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
6
4
3
5
4
5
5
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
6
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
3
4
4
4
5
5
3
5
4
4
Amb. P
989
987
1000
995
995
973
969
983
971
969
967
984
980
986
970
966
1002
968
1002
1021
997
1026
1018
1016
1007
980
977
1005
981
1011
998
1019
998
970
997
964
984
997
1018
1021
1023
985
1020
1023
986
983
P1 (mbar)
881
876
876
895
897
864
829
849
898
864
887
912
846
850
865
856
862
897
864
909
862
911
880
772
886
901
849
797
896
891
864
896
874
852
876
916
909
876
867
903
873
913
910
920
858
915
910
P2 (mbar)
857
866
943
919
905
925
856
924
837
935
928
869
865
921
899
927
884
882
884
939
934
931
936
946
918
932
910
833
922
900
837
924
988
926
890
947
974
902
922
920
926
904
953
918
911
931
929
P3 (mbar)
913
913
938
919
843
916
868
926
892
931
918
933
901
907
900
921
892
894
891
928
932
881
934
940
902
893
883
849
917
887
884
917
976
916
872
935
941
920
883
907
936
895
961
919
903
93
930
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM0402613
ALM042613
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM04299
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
FlowmeterH04-SE03
Flow K04-SE03
FID Fuel Pressure -563
Flow K04-SE01 ; mpg2.
L04-SE13
H04-SE08
I04 SE03
Flowmeter H04-SE08
Flowmeter K04-SE01
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/29/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/1 8/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/19/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
4/7/2005
S" 3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
3/24/2005
4/1/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
3/28/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/29/2005
c 3/29/2005
3/31/2005
4/1/2005
4/1/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
C03-SG02
C03-SG01
C03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
C03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
C03-SG02
H03-SG03
C03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
C03-SG02
C03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG02
C03-SG02
C03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
C03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
443
1306
1704
1427
1823
1741
811
1721
1156
906
1782
630
186
1420
608
759
557
1312
1566
1804
1752
973
501
423
1410
1471
804
274
1147
754
1059
1494
1759
1692
1535
687
270
482
1192
891
1276
1215
274
285
1162
1162
1380
471
1735
1081
1814
1826
559
1820
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.3
12.4
12.3
12.6
12.3
12.4
12.8
12.6
12.3
12.6
12.6
12.5
12.7
12.3
12.4
12.3
12.6
12.8
12.6
12.5
12.7
12.6
12.8
12.8
12.5
12.7
13
13
12.2
12.4
12.1
12.7
12.6
12.6
12.7
12.4
12.6
12.3
12.8
12.6
12.9
12.6
Ambient
Temp ( C)
21.1
19.8
19.4
18.1
18.4
20
17.1
16.4
17.1
20.8
17.4
13.9
17.1
17.8
23.8
19.4
18.6
16.9
13.9
16.6
19.3
16.3
16
14.8
17.4
20.1
14
14.6
16.6
23.3
20.4
18.5
23.9
23.4
25.3
24
16.9
18.4
15.8
20.4
20.1
20
25.6
21.4
17.6
20.4
19.1
21.3
19.5
23.9
22.9
16.1
17.1
18.6
RH (%)
23
22
47
26
31
24
26
31
30
32
33
33
33
28
23
31
27
28
26
29
27
32
44
38
51
33
44
36
31
27
31
34
25
30
31
27
46
49
39
34
34
28
27
31
25
32
35
30
33
33
36
40
35
28
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
192
195
193
195
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
192
194
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
195
195
195
194
195
195
196
193
196
193
195
194
195
193
196
195
195
195
193
196
195
195
193
193
195
193
195
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
3
4
4
5
5
4
3
4
4
5
3
4
3
4
5
3
4
4
5
3
4
4
3
6
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
6
4
4
5
5
4
4
Amb. P
1016
979
975
992
987
994
971
1010
983
989
1000
1002
981
1019
982
1001
988
994
994
981
980
989
985
1018
1012
1002
1008
1014
1008
1005
1007
1012
1015
1013
1006
1018
1006
970
1020
1014
991
971
1021
1021
996
1019
979
981
972
972
962
1016
1019
1016
P1 (mbar)
868
876
838
909
903
942
863
882
865
905
892
895
849
907
856
875
893
916
915
906
872
903
899
898
868
801
881
865
863
850
884
909
870
865
847
865
884
900
871
851
903
870
911
912
859
916
879
862
838
883
893
906
902
863
P2 (mbar)
860
927
893
934
928
1017
874
934
925
904
878
875
929
950
928
921
940
945
938
944
930
935
900
813
902
823
913
925
936
878
917
895
924
919
925
903
933
911
968
920
933
893
943
881
898
936
929
900
855
866
894
937
958
937
P3 (mbar)
928
924
906
927
928
933
905
915
916
907
871
905
913
928
933
910
931
940
934
909
925
898
888
870
871
802
895
930
927
885
894
895
915
908
914
932
928
923
932
857
934
889
935
873
887
936
920
883
882
904
911
925
950
929
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM042613
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM041623
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
Vehicle will not communicate using ar
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850 PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM04263
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM041263
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
H04-SE08
H04-SE03
H04-SE08
K04-SE03
PEM Serial Number- Bl
PEM Serial Number- Bl
-------
Page 5 (Installation for Precodition ng Drive)
Date
4/2/2005
4/2/2005
4/4/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/4/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/7/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/7/2005
4/9/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/9/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
C03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
C03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1704
630
739
1354
1758
1794
1004
896
1118
375
696
948
410
1153
1402
1030
458
1757
1031
1347
1802
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.9
12.5
12.6
12.4
13.1
12.4
12.5
12.9
12.5
12.6
12.3
12.5
12.9
12.4
12.8
12.8
12.6
12.6
Ambient
Temp ( C)
16
18
27
22.1
21.9
19.4
22.8
18.9
22.3
22
25.4
22.3
21.3
18
19.9
21.6
22.4
27
27.4
22.1
23.4
RH (%)
16
23
33
52
56
42
48
70
51
50
33
50
53
73
43
50
30
30
30
26
44
FID Oven
Tempi C)
195
194
193
195
193
193
192
195
192
195
195
193
193
193
194
193
194
193
194
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
3
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
5
5
4
5
4
5
5
6
3
Amb. P
983
994
968
968
980
1006
985
972
971
972
977
1004
972
972
992
1006
990
1014
993
1009
985
P1 (mbar)
875
859
862
897
899
900
851
867
858
868
908
857
901
901
905
891
854
887
904
851
807
P2 (mbar)
945
931
879
876
929
925
930
885
935
884
937
907
875
879
899
931
927
932
939
928
872
P3 (mbar)
939
918
868
886
926
921
923
867
929
909
906
899
853
891
926
902
913
925
905
913
840
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-15765
ISO-15765
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM041623
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM041263
ALM042163
ALM042163
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM047613
ALM042613
ALM042163
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
OBDII protocol- CAN. F
FlowmeterH03-SE08
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
8/10/2004
7/19/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/24/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/22/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/23/2004
7/24/2004
7/24/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/27/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
7/28/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
NA
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
NA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
27
75 F
29
28
35
32
37
34
30
30
33
29
19
30
32
30
32
26
26
26
21
22
20
20
23
25
25
21
26
23
26
29
24
29
RH (%)
37
64
68
72
38
53
39
55
58
60
53
65
74
63
55
60
55
70
74
75
70
73
72
76
64
48
54
77
44
65
49
47
56
52
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
196
193
194
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
5
5
6
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
Amb. P
980
975
P1 (mbar)
858
899
851
851
849
841
846
852
851
852
846
827
867
853
856
856
856
862
860
854
858
864
866
868
854
864
825
865
830
859
817
778
817
855
P2 (mbar)
903
903
891
893
872
877
875
879
887
886
876
847
910
901
883
882
886
888
928
894
894
904
912
925
894
898
868
928
871
924
846
886
858
883
P3 (mbar)
870
921
875
873
886
841
862
878
881
889
881
854
892
889
866
854
887
880
889
852
862
914
908
885
857
895
838
883
839
865
822
900
820
872
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850 VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J 1850 VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J 1850 VPW
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J 1850 VPW
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J 1850 VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J 1850 VPW
SAE-J 1 850 PWM
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
ALM066169
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
CAL771
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM066169
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
Comments
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
7/29/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
7/30/2004
8/4/2004
7/30/2004
7/31/2004
8/3/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
7/30/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
8/2/2004
7/31/2004
7/31/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/4/2004
8/12/2004
8/4/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/5/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/6/2004
8/7/2004
8/7/2004
8/7/2004
8/9/2004
8/9/2004
8/10/2004
8/9/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
24
26
27
25
23
22
25
30
23
32
34
30
23
27
30
31
34
25
31
28
27
27
24
29
22
24
28
24
29
23
22
25
26
19
23
28
30
27
22
22
RH (%)
69
54
56
64
70
75
65
64
71
39
50
54
77
53
65
62
51
71
50
68
73
81
37
67
69
52
41
56
38
51
58
44
38
72
57
42
47
58
56
73
FID Oven
Temp( C)
191
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
187
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
189
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
187
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
6
5
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
4
4
Amb. P
977
977
974
975
975
972
974
977
974
978
977
974
975
975
975
978
978
974
973
970
982
972
982
984
983
983
983
985
984
985
983
981
981
979
982
982
982
981
P1 (mbar)
858
856
816
811
794
856
802
849
792
853
849
854
859
852
852
852
852
857
854
852
851
850
861
850
865
862
860
863
859
865
866
863
861
863
860
856
858
860
863
862
P2 (mbar)
928
881
840
852
825
830
821
838
834
859
851
862
870
852
857
846
847
863
864
835
831
843
901
837
854
830
823
830
829
849
863
843
836
841
822
786
909
933
937
809
P3 (mbar)
862
874
841
818
805
792
827
826
797
830
837
845
829
839
848
798
839
853
854
805
823
808
864
829
817
817
810
785
824
819
806
812
828
784
774
775
889
927
894
798
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
Comments
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
8/10/2004
8/10/2004
8/10/2004
8/9/2004
8/11/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/12/2004
8/13/2004
8/13/2004
8/13/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/14/2004
8/16/2004
8/16/2004
8/17/2004
8/17/2004
8/19/2004
8/1 7/2004
8/18/2004
8/18/2004
8/19/2004
t vehicle -trunk
8/19/2004
8/19/2004
8/19/2004
8/20/2004
8/20/2004
ve), extended p
8/21/2004
8/21/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/23/2004
8/24/2004
8/24/2004
8/24/2004
8/24/2004
8/25/2004
8/25/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
& passeng
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
econd rout
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
5r compartn
30
30
30
30
30
e. Mike S.
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
nent too sm
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
22
22
25
29
20
20
19
24
16
24
23
21
19
23
20
20
24
25
18
28
26
22
24
30
27
22
all -MikeS
22
22
21
19
20
21
20
25
25
26
26
23
22
23
25
29
27
RH (%)
57
56
47
52
64
57
63
37
70
38
49
59
69
54
64
66
47
54
74
57
64
51
70
47
58
49
48
52
47
74
72
74
78
84
79
74
78
79
81
77
65
70
74
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
5
Amb. P
983
983
981
982
982
983
983
980
983
982
985
985
984
986
986
986
984
983
984
978
978
980
978
974
974
980
980
979
981
978
978
982
982
973
973
973
973
975
974
974
970
970
970
P1 (mbar)
863
863
861
859
862
863
865
868
867
860
864
865
865
866
866
865
863
860
867
855
856
861
859
851
852
859
860
859
860
860
861
861
862
852
839
854
850
855
853
810
849
847
849
P2 (mbar)
903
905
913
915
897
895
903
898
946
894
906
901
944
904
905
904
901
908
939
888
884
941
932
882
886
887
891
895
899
894
934
895
891
882
855
931
878
897
895
926
904
906
947
P3 (mbar)
873
879
879
889
879
866
872
864
884
868
859
856
867
860
855
863
866
864
868
852
853
888
840
850
852
852
862
852
861
862
847
866
855
862
829
868
858
838
909
921
895
893
889
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
Comments
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
8/27/2004
8/26/2004
8/28/2004
8/26/2004
8/26/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/28/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/30/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
8/31/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/2/2004
9/1/2004
9/1/2004
9/2/2004
9/2/2004
9/2/2004
9/8/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/9/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/10/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG04
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
31
27
24
30
28
31
33
34
30
26
24
24
21
30
29
25
22
31
26
33
21
27
25
29
31
26
30
28
25
25
18
25
20
27
23
24
31
26
30
29
24
RH (%)
62
76
74
65
70
60
54
53
65
63
74
79
74
45
47
56
76
42
62
42
82
58
63
46
39
60
43
52
65
64
69
47
70
42
53
55
31
45
33
41
58
FID Oven
Temp( C)
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
193
195
195
195
193
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
193
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Amb. P
974
971
978
971
970
974
974
974
973
978
978
977
981
982
982
982
982
984
985
984
984
985
985
985
979
985
984
981
981
981
984
983
983
982
983
983
982
983
982
982
982
P1 (mbar)
860
858
868
855
858
860
859
858
860
867
867
866
872
868
869
871
872
874
876
871
877
877
880
876
868
878
874
872
873
873
883
875
877
873
872
873
872
871
868
873
810
P2 (mbar)
954
945
961
850
949
955
948
952
947
953
958
951
956
956
955
964
962
940
961
938
959
947
930
918
940
940
928
934
931
931
931
915
941
909
934
938
924
936
912
912
838
P3 (mbar)
944
941
938
942
942
945
944
941
945
952
935
942
953
949
951
953
955
880
955
881
956
935
859
862
879
864
894
864
855
856
906
873
876
870
861
867
883
860
863
869
835
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
Comments
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/14/2004
9/15/2004
9/15/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/15/2004
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
9/17/2004
9/1 7/2004
9/17/2004
9/16/2004
9/17/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/18/2004
9/1 8/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/20/2004
9/18/2004
9/19/2004
9/30/2004
9/20/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
1877
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
195
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
18
23
28
30
28
30
26
26
26
27
28
26
24
27
26
21
22
26
27
25
21
22
32
32
23
26
29
23
28
29
19
27
27
25
27
31
23
28
29
RH (%)
81
61
41
56
60
57
67
76
73
31
30
36
47
66
32
68
55
44
45
44
57
80
47
45
72
37
34
45
57
33
47
36
48
51
46
42
53
43
39
FID Oven
Temp( C)
176
195
195
195
195
195
178
194
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
195
194
195
195
195
195
195
195
194
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
5
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
6
7
Amb. P
981
982
982
974
974
974
970
970
970
972
977
977
979
980
970
979
979
978
979
978
979
978
981
979
978
980
982
979
981
978
980
986
980
981
981
981
980
981
990
890
P1 (mbar)
878
875
874
824
829
829
864
859
862
863
868
868
870
872
862
870
874
872
870
870
869
872
874
869
866
873
871
867
872
867
868
859
867
870
873
871
869
872
858
860
P2 (mbar)
950
933
911
907
910
908
944
897
911
911
918
917
919
916
915
919
929
914
920
918
914
913
942
918
917
918
919
943
913
924
922
922
922
940
943
940
939
946
905
917
P3 (mbar)
898
861
865
856
866
859
933
918
869
877
868
865
908
871
875
909
873
877
873
869
868
867
897
864
877
873
868
866
865
877
885
816
885
862
870
866
860
870
873
879
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Cound not hook VI in
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850 PWM
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
C
Zero Gas #
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
Comments
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/22/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/23/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/25/2004
9/13/2004
9/13/2004
9/13/2004
9/13/2004
9/13/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/27/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/29/2004
9/28/2004
9/30/2004
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
30
19
25
24
25
25
23
16
27
21
25
23
29
29
15
32
27
25
31
31
26
22
22
16
21
20
20
25
23
23
16
23
12
19
25
19
RH (%)
40
63
45
46
57
54
61
78
34
58
43
55
32
33
79
39
49
55
42
42
40
63
60
79
58
59
67
26
48
27
56
27
70
43
28
48
FID Oven
Temp( C)
194
195
194
194
194
194
174
193
194
194
194
194
194
195
193
195
195
182
195
195
193
194
193
193
194
194
194
194
194
194
194
194
193
193
194
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
7
3
5
5
5
6
5
4
5
5
6
5
4
5
3
4
4
3
4
4
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
6
4
Amb. P
989
983
991
991
987
987
986
991
991
991
992
993
992
993
992
974
976
976
975
975
989
990
990
989
993
993
991
991
993
988
991
989
991
991
991
986
P1 (mbar)
857
876
897
887
858
898
857
863
862
863
862
864
861
867
832
832
868
827
830
858
861
861
864
863
864
863
862
864
864
866
861
859
P2 (mbar)
906
928
908
905
910
914
944
910
913
909
913
916
911
937
926
914
955
917
917
901
911
911
907
901
906
901
899
906
887
900
899
923
P3 (mbar)
877
928
859
859
871
867
917
862
875
861
874
875
886
905
878
864
938
872
871
884
866
866
852
841
858
841
872
858
851
828
873
833
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850 PWM
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
C
Zero Gas #
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
Comments
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
9/30/2004
10/1/2004
10/1/2004
9/30/2004
10/1/2004
10/1/2004
/1 2/2005
11 2/2005
11 2/2005
11 2/2005
/1 3/2005
/1 3/2005
/1 3/2005
1/13/2005
1/14/2005
1/14/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/15/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/17/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/18/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/19/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
1/20/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG05
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
1996
1986
1985
2000
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
26
28
27
20
21
23
23
21
4
4
4
4
0
-1
2
-1
-6
-3
-11
57 F
-6
56.5 F
57.7 F
2
1
-2
0
1
3
3
0
5
2
11
10
5
7
10
12
19
14
6
RH (%)
42
40
42
77
78
44
69
66
85
81
76
84
59
58
58
52
41
31
56
15
55
17
15
33
33
45
34
30
40
40
45
44
40
54
56
66
63
55
57
16
53
75
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
194
194
194
194
194
194
194
195
195
195
196
195
195
195
195
192
195
195
195
195
195
195
193
195
195
195
195
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
Chil er
Temp ( C)
6
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Amb. P
984
983
984
982
982
986
981
982
960
962
962
962
980
982
976
983
1001
987
999
1001
1004
1001
1002
1008
1001
1001
1002
1002
1003
1003
1004
998
1003
995
993
993
994
993
983
981
982
983
P1 (mbar)
855
853
855
853
851
853
856
852
874
878
872
878
903
893
896
896
898
898
895
889
895
892
896
897
855
885
884
879
884
875
874
874
874
872
863
860
848
864
P2 (mbar)
901
899
901
900
918
920
923
915
936
936
939
937
756
959
561
972
381
964
957
957
963
964
960
906
906
963
927
907
924
916
932
921
913
912
888
851
923
P3 (mbar)
864
824
864
844
910
891
916
886
907
917
934
908
753
954
567
966
566
900
933
905
958
919
880
883
883
941
886
876
844
879
924
852
841
853
861
847
935
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
C
Zero Gas #
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ74
FHJ74
FHJ74
FHJ74
FHJ74
FHJ742
FHJ742
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
Comments
Flow meter # H04 SEO;
Flow meter SN:K04SE
Flow meter SN:K04SE
Flo meter SN: K04-SEO
No run Semtech down.
P2 - Faults 1
OBDII Protocol - V1 wo
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/21/2005
1/22/2005
1/22/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/25/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/27/2005
1/26/2005
1/26/2005
1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/27/2005
1/28/2005
1/29/2005
1/28/2005
1/28/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
1/29/2005
2/1/2005
1/31/2005
1/31/2005
2/1/2005
2/1/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/2/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/3/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/4/2005
2/5/2005
2/5/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG01
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
5
5
6
6
-4
-5
-7
-5
8
8
15
14
8
8
5
3
8
5
2
5
5
4
4
6
2
7
4
5
7
5
7
5
4
4
5
11
10
1
15
10
11
11
17
12
12
RH (%)
69
72
66
63
35
48
41
40
53
54
39
41
60
53
53
76
55
62
66
61
44
70
42
78
57
74
69
66
71
52
63
64
63
44
47
48
65
39
53
53
53
32
44
44
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Amb. P
983
987
981
986
999
1001
999
996
980
980
976
977
990
992
999
988
992
1000
1000
1000
996
992
995
992
991
991
991
998
995
996
997
998
997
997
996
998
999
999
996
997
996
996
994
991
991
P1 (mbar)
863
869
863
869
882
884
883
861
860
855
856
870
872
879
870
871
880
879
879
875
871
875
872
871
869
871
878
874
875
876
876
878
877
876
877
877
879
874
878
878
878
872
871
871
P2 (mbar)
892
918
864
886
924
890
924
918
915
883
877
885
908
934
934
873
893
942
892
879
849
894
931
933
828
879
928
912
905
924
933
897
898
929
928
928
936
926
892
893
893
910
918
918
P3 (mbar)
833
916
827
827
895
830
895
908
908
826
831
867
836
829
922
857
821
935
825
862
812
845
884
934
811
857
922
881
854
897
894
885
883
865
893
892
931
909
891
894
894
877
857
857
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850 PWM
SAE-J1850 VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850PWM
C
Zero Gas #
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
FHJ742
ALM035591
FHJ742
FHJ742
ALM035591
FHJ742
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
ALM060855
Comments
OBD II Protocol - V1 no
OBD II Protocol - V1 no
OBD II Protocol - V1 no
Semtech - changed Ite
OBD II Protocol -V1 no
OBD II Protocol - V1 no
OBD II Protocol -V1 no
OBD II Protocol - V1 no
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
2/5/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/7/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/8/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/9/2005
2/1 0/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/10/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/11/2005
2/12/2005
2/12/2005
2/12/2005
2/12/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/15/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/16/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
13
1
0
2
0
-2
-2
-3
-1
0
-1
2
0
-3
-1
-1
0
-5
6
3
5
7
0
7
9
11
6
8
9
11
13
4
6
6
1
5
10
7
12
10
0
7
5
2
8
RH (%)
42
78
76
78
74
66
73
78
79
76
73
47
49
57
51
51
59
72
48
53
58
55
72
71
66
75
73
76
73
65
50
65
56
52
70
53
39
40
33
32
63
38
42
52
76
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
5
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
Amb. P
991
990
991
989
990
993
993
992
990
989
991
992
993
993
994
994
998
998
997
999
996
996
995
984
984
982
984
979
980
981
981
995
995
996
996
996
993
996
993
996
997
997
997
998
987
P1 (mbar)
871
870
872
870
872
875
875
875
873
872
873
873
874
877
877
876
880
880
875
880
875
875
876
865
864
861
864
859
859
860
860
874
874
874
876
876
873
875
870
874
877
875
876
878
866
P2 (mbar)
913
914
907
912
900
930
918
930
902
895
916
924
900
932
918
919
921
935
838
911
910
886
931
846
823
821
936
914
903
894
852
930
916
911
933
882
870
882
881
808
931
864
875
885
858
P3 (mbar)
852
853
849
858
864
923
893
924
847
847
860
858
857
940
865
868
868
931
802
841
852
828
924
822
800
792
912
908
881
877
883
927
893
888
930
888
837
856
834
853
929
879
867
884
836
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850 PWM
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
Comments
OBD II Protocol -V1 no
Void test traction contro
OBD II Protocol -V1 no
OBD II Protocol - V1 nt
OBDII Protocol - V1 co
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/19/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/22/2005
3/12/2005
3/18/2005
3/25/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
2/23/2005
3/11/2005
2/24/2005
2/24/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
2/25/2005
3/21/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/26/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
2/28/2005
3/26/2005
1/1/2005
1/1/2005
3/31/2005
3/2/2005
3/30/2005
3/3/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/4/2005
3/5/2005
3/8/2005
3/5/2005
3/5/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2498
2498
2498
2490
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
8
8
9
6
4
4
7
13
12
20
9
9
9
6
8
6
10
10
13
12
9
10
6
2
3
1
5
-2
0
2
11
2
18
7
13
8
5
6
11
5
9
RH (%)
75
73
73
69
77
75
71
38
37
35
47
48
50
42
60
66
44
44
37
44
50
50
58
52
52
58
77
55
47
37
58
62
48
51
65
75
79
62
31
66
54
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
192
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
6
6
6
5
6
5
6
6
Amb. P
991
991
989
989
988
989
994
969
976
983
994
993
994
985
991
990
989
988
989
981
991
990
991
985
984
985
989
990
991
991
986
987
963
987
984
984
984
994
985
1019
995
P1 (mbar)
870
870
869
867
867
869
875
847
854
862
873
870
872
865
869
869
868
867
866
860
869
868
870
865
864
865
867
871
872
871
836
868
843
865
862
863
863
872
865
818
873
P2 (mbar)
925
888
875
840
912
921
931
892
905
915
930
921
927
917
880
925
876
885
888
810
917
860
925
910
921
914
918
927
913
903
871
920
893
916
862
873
910
892
866
834
893
P3 (mbar)
918
863
848
812
909
901
927
889
903
912
927
883
881
913
856
921
847
851
850
933
864
824
925
847
947
848
909
923
886
851
875
918
913
912
816
854
906
872
833
860
834
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850 VPW
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J 1850 VPW
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850 PWM
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
ISO 9141
Vehicle will not commu
J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
N/A
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM038949
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM038949
ALM034356
ALM034949
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
ALM060855
ALM060855
Comments
nformation pulled off sf
I04SE07. Phase 1 o ru
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005
3/9/2005
3/9/2005
4/5/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/5/2005
4/5/2005
4/2/2005
4/4/2005
4/4/2005
3/15/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/11/2005
3/12/2005
3/12/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/14/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
2498
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
11
12
11
11
11
4
8
3
3
14
4
3
21
18
20
22
20
21
20
18
7
12
9
7
13
15
8
9
20
16
4
7
11
10
14
9
12
13
14
16
6
15
13
11
13
RH (%)
55
52
53
48
41
44
40
55
53
38
45
51
62
70
61
54
66
38
40
40
35
46
54
38
33
27
38
56
24
32
57
44
30
28
24
62
28
26
25
25
71
32
42
57
34
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
194
193
194
193
193
193
193
194
194
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
5
6
5
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
Amb. P
976
976
978
977
977
986
986
986
988
979
990
989
974
978
979
975
974
978
978
978
993
979
979
985
980
978
984
969
970
969
991
992
990
993
991
991
992
992
990
986
991
987
988
990
982
P1 (mbar)
855
854
856
857
856
866
865
866
867
856
868
868
852
856
857
853
852
855
855
854
871
858
858
864
859
858
863
850
848
848
871
871
868
871
867
869
870
869
867
864
869
864
866
867
862
P2 (mbar)
873
900
903
901
901
878
872
925
928
844
871
883
902
870
846
883
874
898
907
912
926
871
880
868
855
840
855
930
897
900
926
905
885
881
887
882
883
905
861
787
933
790
855
895
784
P3 (mbar)
851
895
881
895
890
862
848
919
917
818
843
844
848
852
856
861
848
847
847
908
925
844
908
835
827
821
819
895
867
852
922
877
867
883
895
849
886
900
885
802
920
792
818
855
798
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850 VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J 1850 VPW
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J 1850 VPW
SAE-J 1850 VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM03435
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
Span Gas #
ALM060855
Comments
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/30/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/17/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/18/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/19/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
3/21/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
3/22/2005
4/8/2005
3/23/2005
3/28/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/24/2005
3/23/2005
3/23/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
3/25/2005
4/1/2005
3/26/2005
3/26/2005
3/29/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/28/2005
3/29/2005
3/29/2005
3/30/2005
3/30/2005
3/31/2005
4/2/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
36
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2498
2498
2498
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
15
11
19
17
9
16
13
17
19
14
18
10
10
6
7
5
13
12
13
14
12
5
4
5
21
10
10
5
9
5
7
20.9
21.5
21.6
7
6
6
11
7
6
23
14
17
23
20
19
17
15
16
10
10
RH (%)
30
44
48
23
53
26
33
32
27
31
30
35
38
46
44
50
43
57
48
40
42
84
84
80
29
60
56
74
65
72
68
37.5
33
34.4
83
84
82
51
71
75
34
45
37
22
30
45
48
57
58
60
42
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
194
193
193
194
194
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
194
193
193
194
194
193
193
194
193
194
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Amb. P
980
983
964
978
983
978
975
973
973
975
973
987
987
987
988
986
982
979
979
980
982
979
979
979
984
983
983
984
984
985
985
1011
1008
981
984
986
985
992
991
990
968
978
978
976
977
970
970
968
966
986
992
P1 (mbar)
860
861
843
856
862
858
854
852
851
853
851
865
865
866
866
866
860
857
857
858
860
858
857
858
861
861
862
863
863
864
878
862
810
858
862
863
863
868
868
868
846
856
855
852
853
847
847
847
846
864
868
P2 (mbar)
877
875
858
842
923
870
874
887
894
870
882
899
816
842
842
882
865
869
870
854
880
884
902
876
883
885
860
916
911
885
863
917
822
892
850
786
825
924
837
880
877
905
901
876
890
867
907
873
859
879
928
P3 (mbar)
910
874
836
847
914
857
846
848
818
839
836
915
788
829
805
882
883
884
875
880
891
877
866
866
866
867
857
915
876
880
857
911
836
871
867
843
841
921
841
910
860
851
852
866
866
841
899
842
839
885
924
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM038949
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM038949
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM034356
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038948
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
Span Gas #
Comments
On front of folder.
-------
Page 7 (Installation for Dyne Sampling)
Date
4/4/2005
4/4/2005
4/6/2005
4/5/2005
4/6/2005
4/6/2005
4/5/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
4/8/2005
4/8/2005
4/7/2005
4/7/2005
4/8/2005
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG01
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (BKI)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
26
24
21
23
16
15
19
13
12
13
13
17
8
12
13
13
RH (%)
31
36
57
51
78
83
68
76
77
74
75
51
81
78
75
71
FID Oven
Temp( C)
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
194
193
193
193
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
7
6
6
6
6
Amb. P
975
976
978
975
978
978
973
987
987
987
985
985
986
986
987
986
P1 (mbar)
851
811
857
853
855
856
851
863
864
864
864
861
863
864
864
863
P2 (mbar)
894
847
839
891
869
912
908
897
897
890
919
884
921
883
900
891
P3 (mbar)
853
846
855
841
848
927
904
853
863
857
916
881
918
855
872
890
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-15765
ISO-15765
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850 VPW
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
C
Zero Gas #
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
ALM010707
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
ALM038949
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
7/23/2004
Install Tech
Sean Pinder/Mark Holland
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG06
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1668
Battery
Voltage
(V)
13.2
Ambient
Temp ( C)
25.9
RH (%)
75
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
857
P2 (mbar)
952
P3 (mbar)
932
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
CylinderNumbers
Zero Gas #
ALM035327
Audit Gas #
ALM066169
Span Gas #
ALM060855
Comments
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
7/29/2004
8/5/2004
8/10/2004
Install Tech
Mark Holland
Scott Sholar
Scott Sholar
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
441
1804
1788
Battery
Voltage
(V)
11.6
12.2
13.1
Ambient
Temp ( C)
25.6
22.9
RH (%)
63
50
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
194
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
4
6
Amb. P
984
987
P1 (mbar)
877
910
922
P2 (mbar)
931
935
947
P3 (mbar)
889
921
911
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM042257
Audit Gas #
ALM066169
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
8/12/2004
8/24/2004
Install Tech
5cott Sholar/Rodney William
Leland May
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
COG-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1744
1735
Battery
Voltage
(V)
11.7/12.5
12.2
Ambient
Temp ( C)
24.6
27.3
RH (%)
43
61
FID Oven
Temp( C)
194
196
Chiller
Temp ( C)
43
4
Amb. P
982
982
P1 (mbar)
876
894
P2 (mbar)
933
918
P3 (mbar)
925
927
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
8/27/2004
8/27/2004
8/31/2004
9/2/2004
9/10/2004
Install Tech
Leland May
Leland May
Rodney Williams
MikeS
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1837
1855
1840
1817
1817
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.1
12.5
12.6
12.7
12
Ambient
Temp ( C)
55
33.6
30.9
27.3
19.5
RH (%)
33.8
56
42
57
69
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
5
5
Amb. P
974
980
984
981
985
P1 (mbar)
900
853
955
903
914
P2 (mbar)
919
901
939
943
938
P3 (mbar)
914
923
972
927
936
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
N/A
CylinderNumbers
Zero Gas #
AAL7737
Audit Gas #
ALM066169
Span Gas #
Comments
Battery voltage - dual batteries, 1
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
9/15/2004
Install Tech
R. Williams/M. Sabisch
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1380
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.1
Ambient
Temp ( C)
25
RH (%)
74
FID Oven
Temp( C)
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
Amb. P
971
P1 (mbar)
861
P2 (mbar)
915
P3 (mbar)
898
OBDII
OBDII protocol
N/A
CylinderNumbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
Battery Voltage - 2 batteries
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
9/13/2004
Install Tech
Leland May
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1838
Battery
Voltage
(V)
11.9
Ambient
Temp ( C)
23.6
RH (%)
73
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
Amb. P
974
P1 (mbar)
902
P2 (mbar)
934
P3 (mbar)
912
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Will not communicate
CylinderNumbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
Note - Ran a zero, & audit, but I
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
I
03
06
3
1/13/2005
uld not conne
Install Tech
Kevin Hicks
ct, tried w/2 different conned
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
ors, might
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
30
De somethi
Battery
Voltage
(V)
g wrong w
Ambient
Temp ( C)
-1
board.
RH (%)
53
FID Oven
Temp( C)
Chiller
Temp ( C)
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
P2 (mbar)
P3 (mbar)
OBDII
OBDII protocol
CylinderNumbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
: working
t working
t working
rs
2/1/2005
t working
: working.
t working
: working
Install Tech
R.Williams
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1621
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.9
Ambient
Temp ( C)
10.3
RH (%)
41
FID Oven
Temp( C)
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
Amb. P
988
P1 (mbar)
925
P2 (mbar)
956
P3 (mbar)
950
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM006117
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
t working
would not tL
working
2/1 1/2005
2/12/2005
Install Tech
rn off!
Mark/Rodney/Carl
Mark/Carl
rd not long enough
2/15/2005
2/17/2005
2/17/2005
2/18/1995
2/18/2005
2/19/2005
Carl/Mark
Mark
Rodney
Carl/Mark/Rodney
Rodney
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1588
1606
1747
1704
1651
1621
1395
1773
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.7
12.6
12.4
12.6
12.8
12.5
Ambient
Temp ( C)
20.4
19.1
19.4
19.3
13.9
15.1
25.8
RH (%)
24
40
32
22
26
27
32
FID Oven
Temp( C)
194
193
195
193
195
193
195
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
Amb. P
992
1010
1010
998
983
1027
987
986
P1 (mbar)
900
853
864
960
915
917
923
938
P2 (mbar)
897
948
883
928
951
889
953
971
P3 (mbar)
849
923
891
897
917
920
949
931
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010869
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
Flow I04-SE03; mpg 21 .0
Flowl04-SE03;mpg17.101
Flow I04-SE03; mpg 1 7. (HC no
Flow I04-SE03; mpg 20.698
FlowH04-SE08;mpg20.549
Flow I04-SE08
FIOWH04-SE08; mpg 20.69
FM#I04-SE13; mpg 16.45
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
Install Tech
PEM
Serial #
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
Battery
Voltage
(V)
Ambient
Temp ( C)
RH (%)
FID Oven
Temp( C)
Chiller
Temp ( C)
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
P2 (mbar)
P3 (mbar)
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/21/2005
2/22/2005
2/24/2005
2/26/2005
Carl/Mark
Mark Wuenstel
Carl Young
Rodney Williams
Mark Wuenstel
M/W
sparate sheet in packet.
2/28/2005
3/1/2005
3/4/2005
3/5/2005
n invalid (no
Carl Young
Carl Young
Rolwe
Carl
4612 flow) remaining runs d
C03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
1817
1743
1734
1738
1753
1750
1615
1665
1685
one before flow meter
12.6
12.5
12.2
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.8
12.4
12.9
12.8
20.9
23.5
17.4
11.9
15.4
17.4
21.4
15.8
21.9
23.4
28
26
30
33
34
34
21
23
27
25
193
191
195
195
193
195
193
193
195
193
4
4
4
4
5
3
4
5
4
4
1019
988
1009
1001
1019
995
978
1022
985
1024
DOX warmed up, so flows through entire run are suspect - Mike
909
939
949
920
880
940
870
909
919
917
933
973
935
947
933
937
925
974
952
927
923
970
932
938
909
930
922
956
917
890
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
SAE-J1850VPW
N/A
SAE-J1850PWM
ISO 9141
J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
I04-SE03
Flow K04-SE01 ; mpg 24.81 3. M
Flow !04-SE03:mpg 19.61
Flow#K04-SE01; mpg 24 .41 2.
Flowl04-SE03;mpg21.581.
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
3/7/2005
3/7/2005
3/8/2005
3/9/2005
3/10/2005
3/10/2005
3/1 1/2005
3/1 1/2005
3/12/2005
3/14/2005
3/16/2005
3/15/2005
3/16/2005
3/17/2005
Install Tech
R. \AJIIiams
Rodney Williams
Carl/Mark
Rodney/Carl
Rodney
R. Williams
Rodney
Carl
Rodney W.
Rodney W.
Carl/Rodney
Carl
Rodney
Carl
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
H03-SG02
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG06
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
H03-SG06
H03-SG03
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1450
1366
1548
1741
1715
1746
1773
1718
1780
1691
1731
1789
1647
1818
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.6
12.8
12.4
12.5
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.8
12.5
12.6
Ambient
Temp ( C)
26.1
23.9
25.9
15
17.5
18.4
16.6
15.9
18.4
12.4
20.4
15.8
17.1
16.6
RH (%)
28
22
21
26
25
27
29
29
30
29
31
25
34
35
FID Oven
Temp( C)
193
194
193
194
195
194
195
193
194
195
195
194
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
6
4
5
3
5
4
5
5
4
4
3
5
Amb. P
971
978
986
1020
1003
970
971
1007
964
990
1022
1019
991
1016
P1 (mbar)
868
904
847
909
841
903
902
845
891
896
911
912
887
902
P2 (mbar)
922
926
879
853
865
930
919
923
915
870
894
926
934
889
P3 (mbar)
912
907
842
924
808
893
919
920
914
858
899
930
932
920
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
CylinderNumbers
Zero Gas #
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
Flow#K04-SE03; mpg 24.692.
FIOWH04-SE08; mpg 19.266.
Flow K04-SE08
Flow L04-SE03; mpg 1 7.948. 2 p
Flow K04-SE01
Flow K04-SE03; mpg 15.344
Flowmeter L04-SE01 ; mpg 23. •
I
I
Flowmeter K04-SE03; mpg 25.4
Flow K04-SE03; 20.348
Flow H04-S EOS
Flow I04-SE03; mpg 1 6.440
FlowH04-SE02; mpg 18.136
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
3/16/2005
3/30/2005
3/21/2005
3/30/2005
Install Tech
Carl
Carl/Holly/Rodney
Rodney Williams
Carl/Holly/Rodney
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1761
1774
1761
1733
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.6
12.8
12.8
12.6
Ambient
Temp ( C)
18.3
30
22
27.3
RH (%)
30
23
25
32
FID Oven
Temp( C)
194
193
196
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
5
3
4
Amb. P
1005
961
971
975
P1 (mbar)
841
889
904
846
P2 (mbar)
911
894
940
920
P3 (mbar)
878
905
932
916
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Vehicle will not commu
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM010867
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
Comments
Flow K04-SE01;mpg 25.1 52
FIOWH04-SE02
FlowH04-SE08;mpg12.641
-------
Page 9 (Installation for Driveaways)
Date
Install Tech
PEM
Serial #
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
Battery
Voltage
(V)
Ambient
Temp ( C)
RH (%)
FID Oven
Temp( C)
Chiller
Temp ( C)
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
P2 (mbar)
P3 (mbar)
OBDII
OBDII protocol
CylinderNumbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
No
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
No
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
No
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Only person in vehicle
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
No
No
No
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
No
No
No
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
No
No
No
Were you only person, or did you pick up
passengers?
Only person
Only person
by myself but 1 picked up about 1 50 pounds of
product at my warehouse
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
Only person - was in rain storm
I picked up about 1 50 pounds of product
at my warehouse and unloaded 1 00 still
has 50 Ibs of product in back seat
No driveaway questionnaire available
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
No
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
No
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Didn't feel same power (less power w/unit o
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
no passengers
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
N/A
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
No driveaway questionnaire available
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
recording) Semtech rebooted. New file (be
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
ore driveaway) KS SLE054 DRIVEAWA
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Y2.XML
Were you only person, or did you pick up
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
eage: 195, 994 miles.
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
No driveaway Questionnaire available.
questionnaire forms (Rnd 2 dway done in
questionnaire forms (Rnd 2 dway done in
No driveaway questionnaire available. 2
questionnaire forms (Rnd 2 dway done in
Feb, dyne in March). Fuel and oil info
pertains to March dyne test.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available. 2
questionnaire forms (Rnd 2 dway done in
Feb, dyne in March). Fuel and oil info
pertains to March dyne test.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
questionnaire forms (Rnd 2 dway done in
No driveaway questionnaire available.
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
m driveaway.
3
47.
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pick up
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
No driveaway questionnaire available.
No driveaway questionnaire available.
-------
ERG Packet
Driveaway questionnaire
Did you drive differently with PEMS?
Did you feel PEMS caused you to drive
differently?
Did PEMS alter your vehicle's
performance?
Were you only person, or did you pickup
passengers?
Passenger pickup & dropoff schedule
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
7/21/2004
Install Tech
Sean Pinder/Mark Holland
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG06
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
322
Battery
Voltage
(V)
11.7
Ambient
Temp ( C)
32.8
RH (%)
61
FID Oven
Tempf C)
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
862
P2 (mbar)
910
P3 (mbar)
924
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
C
Zero Gas #
ALM035327
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM066169
Span Gas #
ALM060855
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/6/2004
Install Tech
Scott Sholar
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
H03-SG03
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
242
581
926
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12
12.6
12.5
Ambient
Temp ( C)
36.1
34.9
27.3
RH (%)
52
55
31
FID Oven
Tempf C)
195
194
187
Chiller
Temp ( C)
3
6
6
Amb. P
972
973
987
P1 (mbar)
859
899
882
P2 (mbar)
922
915
935
P3 (mbar)
901
873
888
OBDII
OBDII protocol
C
Zero Gas #
Will not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Will not communic
te
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
8/13/2004
8/13/2004
8/25/2004
Install Tech
Grooms
Scott Sholar
Rodney Williams
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1082
193
1775
Battery
Voltage
(V)
11.8
12.5
13
Ambient
Temp ( C)
23.6
23.9
30
RH (%)
46
49
74
FID Oven
Tempf C)
193
193
196
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
4
4
Amb. P
990
984
961
P1 (mbar)
925
910
893
P2 (mbar)
953
929
922
P3 (mbar)
936
915
925
OBDII
OBDII protocol
C
Zero Gas #
fill not communicate
fill not communica
fill not communicat
e
e
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
Install Tech
PEM
Serial #
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
Battery
Voltage
(V)
Ambient
Temp ( C)
RH (%)
FID Oven
Tempf C)
Chiller
Temp ( C)
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
P2 (mbar)
P3 (mbar)
OBDII
OBDII protocol
C
Zero Gas #
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
9/20/2004
Install Tech
Leland Mav
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
292
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.9
Ambient
Temp ( C)
29.5
RH (%)
34.1
FID Oven
Tempf C)
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
7
Amb. P
984
P1 (mbar)
883
P2 (mbar)
835
P3 (mbar)
805
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
C
Zero Gas #
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
9/22/2004
9/21/2004
9/22/2004
9/23/2004
9/24/2004
9/24/2004
9/25/2004
9/27/2004
9/28/2004
9/28/2004
9/27/2004
Install Tech
Leland May/Scott Sholar
Scott Sholar
Leland May
Scott Sholar/Leland May
Scott Sholar
Scott Sholar
Scott Sholar
Leland May
Scott Sholar
Scott Sholar
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG02
H03-SG03
H03-SG06
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
H03-SG05
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
522
526
1394
738
1503
921
1155
554
326
807
705
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.1
12.8
11.8
12.4
11.8
12.5
12.8
11.4
12.2
12
Ambient
Temp ( C)
27.6
28.6
32.4
23.9
27.9
27.9
31.4
22.5
29.1
RH (%)
44
48
31.9
58
36
31
51.2
50
34
FID Oven
Tempf C)
193
193
193
193
194
193
194
194
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
6
6
5
7
6
7
0
5
6
5
Amb. P
985
981
989
983
989
985
990
988
988
992
982
P1 (mbar)
910
867
869
878
868
876
869
868
842
873
855
P2 (mbar)
933
919
816
917
925
940
927
904
860
862
879
P3 (mbar)
928
86
794
885
913
908
916
804
875
828
878
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
SAE-J1850VPW
C
Zero Gas #
Will not communicate
SAE-J1850PWM
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Will not communicate
Wll not communicate
ISO-9141-2
Wll not communicate
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
1/19/2005
1/20/2005
Install Tech
R.Williams
Carl & Rodney
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
663
1692
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.3
Ambient
Temp ( C)
12.8
17.8
RH (%)
45
40
FID Oven
Tempf C)
191
Chiller
Temp ( C)
3
Amb. P
987
975
P1 (mbar)
916
906
P2 (mbar)
926
941
P3 (mbar)
885
937
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not cor
Vehicle will not cor
C
Zero Gas #
ALM050011
ALM050011
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
ALM041307
Span Gas #
25.3 mpg
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
1/22/2005
1/27/2005
2/1/2005
2/2/2005
Install Tech
MarkW.
R.Williams
Rodnev/Mark
Mark
PEM
Serial #
C03-SG01
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
572
1700
651
1680
Battery
Voltage
(V)
13.2
13.1
12.2
12.2
Ambient
Temp ( C)
18.4
17.4
11.4
17.6
RH (%)
20
29
35
23
FID Oven
Tempf C)
194
195
191
192
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
4
6
5
Amb. P
1009
1003
991
989
P1 (mbar)
958
988
905
890
P2 (mbar)
945
949
935
911
P3 (mbar)
942
952
927
883
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not cor
Vehicle will not cor
C
Zero Gas #
ALM006117
ALM006117
ALM006117
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
ALM041307
ALM041307
Span Gas #
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
2/12/2005
2/12/2005
Install Tech
Carl/Mark/Rodnev
R.Williams
PEM
Serial #
C03-SG01
H03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1792
1481
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.6
12.6
Ambient
Temp ( C)
18.9
16.9
RH (%)
45
40
FID Oven
Tempf C)
195
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
3
4
Amb. P
990
976
P1 (mbar)
978
909
P2 (mbar)
984
941
P3 (mbar)
982
937
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
C
Zero Gas #
ALM006117
ALM006117
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM041307
ALM041307
Span Gas #
FIOWH04-SE08
FIOWH04-SE08
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
2/21/2005
3/18/2005
3/1/2005
3/4/2005
Install Tech
Carl/Rodney
R.Williams
Carl/Mark
Carl
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
H03-SG02
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
886
1815
337
565
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.6
12.4
12.4
12.4
Ambient
Temp ( C)
23.4
18.9
25.2
21.9
RH (%)
24
32
20
22
FID Oven
Tempf C)
195
194
195
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
4
5
4
Amb. P
1017
968
1006
1009
P1 (mbar)
911
894
914
869
P2 (mbar)
939
924
935
915
P3 (mbar)
934
914
930
883
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850PWM
Vehicle will not cor
Vehicle will not cor
C
Zero Gas #
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
ALM010867
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
FIOWH04-SG08
Flow meter H04
Flow J04-SE06;
Flow I04-SE03;
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
3/5/2005
3/7/2005
Install Tech
Carl
MW
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
C03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
467
560
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.3
12.2
Ambient
Temp ( C)
18.6
RH (%)
23
FID Oven
Tempf C)
193
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
5
Amb. P
1023
983
P1 (mbar)
878
855
P2 (mbar)
878
920
P3 (mbar)
845
917
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
C
Zero Gas #
ALM010867
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
Span Gas #
FIOWH04-SE03
Vehicle will not communicate using any of the above communic
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
3/21/2005
3/23/2005
3/25/2005
Install Tech
Carl
Carl/Holly
Carl/Rodney
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG06
H03-SG01
C03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
1822
1104
466
Battery
Voltage
(V)
13.1
12.5
12.3
Ambient
Temp ( C)
28.9
17.8
21.8
RH (%)
23
40
29
FID Oven
Tempf C)
194
195
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
4
6
Amb. P
1008
1008
1010
P1 (mbar)
885
832
879
P2 (mbar)
926
834
908
P3 (mbar)
917
829
910
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not cor
SAE-J1850VPW
Vehicle will not cor
C
Zero Gas #
ALM042613
ALM042613
ALM042613
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
ALM049099
ALM049099
ALM049099
Span Gas #
FlowK04-SE 1
FIOWI04-SEC3;
FIOWK04-SE 3
-------
Page 11 (Installation for Replicate Preconditioning Drive)
Date
Install Tech
PEM
Serial #
SEMTECH System Information (ERG)
FID Pres
(psig)
Battery
Voltage
(V)
Ambient
Temp ( C)
RH (%)
FID Oven
Tempf C)
Chiller
Temp ( C)
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
P2 (mbar)
P3 (mbar)
OBDII
OBDII protocol
C
Zero Gas #
Under Numbers
Audit Gas #
Span Gas #
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
7/22/2004
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
Dyne Sampling Dupe
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG04
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
29
RH (%)
70
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
853
P2 (mbar)
898
P3 (mbar)
909
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM014633
Audit Gas
#
CAL771
Span Gas #
Comments
CAL013942
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
8/3/2004
8/3/2004
8/2/2004
8/6/2004
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
DUPE
Dupe Dyne
Dyne Sampling Dupes
Dyne Dupes
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
29
32
27
26
RH (%)
68
57
74
41
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
190
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
5
5
Amb. P
974
974
975
984
P1 (mbar)
852
851
855
862
P2 (mbar)
851
840
837
834
P3 (mbar)
816
822
811
818
OBDII
OBDII protocol
fill not communical
SAE-J1850VPW
ISO-9141-2
Ml not communic
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
M.M034356
M.M034356
M.M03435
M.M03435
Comments
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
8/11/2004
8/16/2004
8/21/2004
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
Dupe Dyne Sampling
Dupe Dyne Sampling
Dyne Sampling Dupe
Dupe Dyne Sampling
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
H03-SG04
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
0
0
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
18
23
25
18
RH (%)
72
51
47
84
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
5
4
Amb. P
982
985
984
981
P1 (mbar)
855
865
862
865
P2 (mbar)
870
906
896
935
P3 (mbar)
856
858
867
841
OBDII
OBDII protocol
fill not communicat
Ml not communic
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM014633
ALM014633
ALM014633
Audit Gas
#
M.M03435
M.M03435
Span Gas #
ALM034356
Comments
CAL013942
CAL013942
CAL013942
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
9/9/2004
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
DUPESEMTECHInst
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG01
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
0
Ambient
Temp ( C)
20
RH (%)
70
FID Oven
Tempi C)
195
Chiller
Temp ( C)
4
Amb. P
982
P1 (mbar)
876
P2 (mbar)
942
P3 (mbar)
877
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Ml not communic
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
FHJ742
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
ALM034356
Comments
CAL013942
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
9/16/2004
9/16/2004
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
Part 1 : SEMTECH Insl
Part 1 : SEMTECH Inst
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG03
H03-SG03
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
591
1117
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12
12.3
Ambient
Temp ( C)
27.9
27.3
RH (%)
33
33
FID Oven
Tempi C)
194
194
Chiller
Temp ( C)
7
6
Amb. P
977
980
P1 (mbar)
861
867
P2 (mbar)
859
922
P3 (mbar)
838
902
OBDII
OBDII protocol
SAE-J1850VPW
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
Ml not communicate
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
9/11/2004
9/11/2004
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
SEMTECH Installatiior
SEMTECH Installation
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SC06
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
466
1810
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12.2
12.2
Ambient
Temp ( C)
27.6
RH (%)
44
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
7
6
Amb. P
986
990
P1 (mbar)
920
902
P2 (mbar)
845
896
P3 (mbar)
862
901
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
Ml not communicate
Ml not communic
te
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
Comments
Duplicate run
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
1/17/2005
1/21/2005
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
SEMTECH Installation
Installation for Replica
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
1543
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
12
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
14.6
6
RH (%)
42
69
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
6
Amb. P
1038
984
P1 (mbar)
935
864
P2 (mbar)
945
911
P3 (mbar)
931
847
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
Vehicle will not cor
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM050011
FHJ742
Audit Gas
#
M.M04130
ALM03435
Span Gas #
6
Comments
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
1/25/2005
1/28/2005
2/1/2005
2/2/2005
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
Installation for Replica
SEMTECH Installaiton
SEMTECH Installation
SEMTECH Installation
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
3
7
7
4
RH (%)
68
40
59
64
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
5
6
6
Amb. P
981
996
998
997
P1 (mbar)
864
877
876
877
P2 (mbar)
918
942
927
907
P3 (mbar)
913
953
895
854
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not cor
Vehicle will not cor
Vehicle will not cor
Vehicle will not cor
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
FHJ742
ALM035591
ALM035591
ALM035591
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
M.M034356
M.M03435
M.M03435
M.M03435
Comments
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
2/14/2005
2/14/2005
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
SEMTECH Installation
SEMTECH Installation
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
30
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
4
10
RH (%)
85
63
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
6
6
Amb. P
981
982
P1 (mbar)
862
862
P2 (mbar)
917
895
P3 (mbar)
911
857
OBDII
OBDII protocol
ISO-9141-2
ISO-9141-2
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM035591
ALM035591
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
M.M034356
M.M034356
Comments
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
mpg 17.41
3/19/2005
mpg 29.5.
mpg 20.11.
3/9/2005
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
SEMTECH Installation
SEMTECH Installation
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
2498
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
5
7
RH (%)
49
34
FID Oven
Tempf C)
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
6
Amb. P
986
988
P1 (mbar)
866
867
P2 (mbar)
920
911
P3 (mbar)
925
862
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not cor
Vehicle will not cor
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM010707
ALM035591
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
ALM034356
ALM03435
6
Comments
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
mpg 19.727
ation protocols.
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
PEM
Serial #
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
Battery
Voltage
(V)
Ambient
Temp ( C)
RH (%)
FID Oven
Tempf C)
Chiller
Temp ( C)
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
P2 (mbar)
P3 (mbar)
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
3/22/2005
3/24/2005
mpg 16.138
mpq 13.443
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
Semtech Installation ft
Semtech Installation fo
PEM
Serial #
H03-SG05
H03-SG05
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
30
2498
Battery
Voltage
(V)
N/A
N/A
Ambient
Temp ( C)
6
72. 5 F
RH (%)
77
32.3
FID Oven
Tempi C)
193
193
Chiller
Temp ( C)
5
6
Amb. P
979
980
P1 (mbar)
859
858
P2 (mbar)
914
857
P3 (mbar)
924
867
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Vehicle will not cor
N/A - too old
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
ALM010707
ALM010707
Audit Gas
#
ALM03435
Span Gas #
6
ALM034356
Comments
-------
Additional Installation Types (such as Replicate Dyne)
Date
Type of Install (i.e.,
rep dyne)
PEM
Serial #
SEMTECH System Information
FID Pres
(psig)
Battery
Voltage
(V)
Ambient
Temp ( C)
RH (%)
FID Oven
Tempf C)
Chiller
Temp ( C)
Amb. P
P1 (mbar)
P2 (mbar)
P3 (mbar)
OBDII
OBDII protocol
Cylinder Numbers
Zero Gas #
Audit Gas
#
Span Gas #
Comments
-------
Make
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Isuzu
GMC
Ford
Ford
Subaru
Toyota
Dodge
Ford
Honda
Honda
Mazda
Dodge
Jeep
Chevrolet
Honda
GMC
Oldsmobile
Jeep
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Saturn
Buick
Nissan
Nissan
Saturn
Dodge
Honda
Mercury
Jeep
Pontiac
Lincoln
Toyota
Dodge
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Lincoln
Honda
Honda
Honda
Honda
Ford
Chevrolet
Honda
Nissan
Chevrolet
Ford
Hyundai
Cadillac
Model
Cavalier
F150
Van
Trooper
Yukon
Escort
F250
Forester
RAV4
Spirit
F-150
Civic
Civic
626
Caravan
jnd Cherol
Corsica
Civic
Jimmy
;ight Cutla;
Cherokee
Cavalier
300
Sedan
LeSabre
Frontier
Pickup
SCI
Caravan
CRV
Villager
Wrangler
Grand Am
!:ontinenta
Solara
Caravan
Blazer
S-10
Mustang
!:ontinenta
Civic
Accord
Accord
Accord
Taurus
Malibu
Odyssey
Pathfinder
Lumina
Mustang
Tiburon
Seville
Year
2001
1979
1994
1999
2001
1995
1979
1999
2000
1990
2001
1996
1991
2001
1989
1999
1996
2002
1995
1988
1998
1990
1999
2001
1998
2002
1987
1996
1995
1998
1994
1995
1989
1989
2001
1997
1995
2003
1968
1990
1999
1997
1989
2000
2003
1998
2004
2003
1998
1999
2000
1991
Mileage
57,049
53,493
111,129
63,375
75,364
102,652
102,264
68,202
92,692
48,820.10
131,483
216,562.40
26,597
161,017
90,120
111,475
50,388
102,915
81,536
131,875
81,282
73,237
51,532
45,444
38,136
138,629
74,620
113,889.80
131,386
74,158
116,806
170,427
40,081
90,061
100,757
19,365
98,851.50
185,060
76,475
79,575
209,974
77,943
25,279
99,428
21,015
12,463
70,731
39,497.60
89,219
70,493
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
N/A
0
None
No
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
No
N/A
N/A
No
N/A
N/A
No
No
N/A
No
No
N/A
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Date of
Last
Rebuild
N/A
2001
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Not known
N/A
NonOEM
mods
N/A
No
None
Engine
N/A
N/A
No
No
N/A
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
No
Not aware
New water
N/A
New radial
Not sure
N/A
Engine rep
Not aware
Not aware
N/A
N/A
New radial
Not aware
No
New air co
None knov
Radiator, v
No
No knowle
Not aware
No
No
Water pun
No
No
Newaltem
No
No
No
Newtransr
No
Newintakf
Recall on s
New struts
No
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Mileage at
purchase?
32,000
125,000
60,000
40,000
29,000
95,000
20,000
18,000
60-85,000
150,000
60,000
33,000
70,000
118,000
120,000
48,000
8,000
14,000
Not sure
130,000
21,000
61,000
72,000
100,000
84,000
47,700
3,000
20,000
59,000
5,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N/A
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N/A
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
2 weeks
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
N/A
N/A
Sometimes
2 months
3 years
6 months
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
N/A
N/A
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
N/A
N/A
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Saturn
Ford
Isuzu
Toyota
Nissan
Ford
Mercury
Toyota
Honda
Toyota
Honda
Jeep
Dodge
Toyota
Nissan
Honda
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Pontiac
Ford
Chevrolet
Plymouth
Buick
Subaru
Ford
Ford
Volvo
Mazda
Dodge
Chrysler
Toyota
Jeep
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mercury
Buick
Ford
Ford
Chrysler
Ford
Chevrolet
Lincoln
Honda
Dodge
Jeep
Ford
Plymouth
Model
SL1
Explorer
Rodeo
RAV4
Sentra
Ranger
Sable
Camry
Civic
Avalon
Civic
Cherokee
Ram
Corolla
Maxima
Civic
F150
Contour
S10
Grand Prix
Explorer
Silverado
Voyager
LeSabre
Legacy OL
'hunderbir
Explorer
S80
Protege
Caravan
Town & Cc
Celica
Cherokee
Camry
Cavalier
Grand Mar
Century
Probe
Bronco
Concorde
Escort ZX;
Blazer
Town car
Accord
Dynasty
Cherokee
Escort
Voyager
Year
1999
1993
1999
2000
1997
1999
2002
1994
1984
1999
1991
1995
1991
1997
2000
1999
1995
1995
1996
1992
2000
2002
1998
1989
1996
1988
1995
2001
1991
1999
2000
1999
1993
2000
1997
1997
1998
1993
1995
2000
1999
2002
1987
1990
1988
1990
2002
1993
Mileage
53,419
120,271.40
114,929
62,759
119,192
91,037
24,580
169,031
87,562
114,750
214,123
171,693
90,008
146,463
74,265
149,656
184,842
102,066
112,247
172,169
86,262
40,718
163,230
108,545
124,047
178,211
160,608
55,515
185,565
104,197
85,423
72,222
172,400
48,457
128,162
74,489
71,187
129,123
198,044.90
93,660
66,812
35,068
129,019
170,424
91,307
261,821
26,740
170,009
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
No
No
No
No
No
None
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
0
N/A
No
No
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
2004
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
Oil pump c
NonOEM
mods
No
Odometer,
No
N
No
No
No
New radial
New fuel p
No
New brake
No
Newaltem
No
No
No
No
New belt o
No
No
No
No
Newtransr
Newaltem
No
New them
Newtransr
No
Head gask
New brake
N/A
No
No
Brakes
No
No
Replace g;
Not sure; r
Belt tensio
Entire eng
None
No
No
No
No
Water pun
No
Transmiss
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Mileage at
purchase?
100,000
75,000
49,000
125,000
10,000
136,000
73,000
63,000
80,000
170,000
75,000
60,000
26,000
150,000
19,000
Not sure
40,000
88,000
Not known
75,000
99,000
19,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Y
Y
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y (belt on
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
How long?
6 months
6 months
ngine)
1 year
2 months
5 months
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
100,000 -really 160, 000
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Honda
Honda
Ford
Ford
Honda
Nissan
Kia
Chrysler
Volvo
Mercury
Ford
Plymouth
Honda
Buick
Cadillac
Ford
Pontiac
Mercury
Mercury
Jeep
Ford
Toyota
Toyota
Honda
Toyota
Toyota
Ford
Subaru
Chevrolet
Hyundai
Mazda
Chevrolet
GMC
GMC
Saturn
Buick
GMC
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Lincoln
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Dodge
Ford
Mazda
Oldsmobile
Lincoln
Nissan
Pontiac
Ford
Model
Odyssey
Accord
F150
Ranger
Accord
Sentra
Sportage
Lebaron
850
Topaz
Focus
Voyager
Civic
Regal
Cimmeron
Ranger
Bonneville
Topaz
Sable
Cherokee
fhunderbir
Camry
Corolla
Civic
Camry
Corolla
F150
Outback
Monte Car
Santa Fe
Miata
Lumina
Safari
Sonoma
SL1
Regal
Astro Van
Caprice
S10
Econoline
Town car
F150
Windstar
C 1500
Stratus
Tempo
MX6
98
Town car
Maxima
Bonneville
F150
Year
2000
2000
2000
1987
2001
1994
2003
1983
1997
1994
2001
1999
1988
1996
1986
1999
1985
1994
1996
1998
1995
1997
1996
2000
2000
2000
1984
2000
1977
2001
2003
1999
1993
2001
1994
1990
1990
1986
1985
1983
1989
1998
1999
1994
1996
1986
1988
1985
1987
1992
1994
1990
Mileage
68,967
76,169
61,031
74,727
56,182
127,045
20,651
43,270
65,084
9,942
52,245
74,695
205,819
139,853
17,601
92,917
236,759
32,686
110,402
82,858
135,032
129,415
148,857
40,402
47,771
70,118
172,311
75,802
135,545
70,613
75,556
42,977
283,221
60,051
116,783
103,889
147,282
303,803
30,295
88,692
82,496
98,654
102,212
99,209
126,725
60,022
222,707
188,049
79,840
53,979
125,218
7,116
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
No
0
0
0
Yes
0
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
5 yrs ago
Previous o
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
Original o^
Not known
NonOEM
mods
12/3engin
No
No
No
Transmiss
No
No
Has only h
This week
Replaced \
New brake
New radial
Newmufflf
Newaltem
No
No
No
New brake
None
No
Transmisis
No
None
No
No
No
None
Radiator
Catalytic c
Check enc
No
No
Transmiss
Not known
No
No
None
Newcatali
None sincf
Transmiss
None
None
None
None
None
Newmufflf
Not known
Water pun
None
None
None
Not known
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Mileage at
purchase?
?
14,000
25,000
20,000
Not sure
98,000
10,000
Quest! onal
Not sure -
40,000
24,000
Not known
35,000
Exempt
24,000
119,000
45,010
Not sure
50,000
95,000
Not known
Not known
75,000
2,000
30,000
191,000
26,000
25,000
105,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Unsure
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
1 - one year ago
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
2 yrs
Forever
?
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Y
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Y
Customer
Paid
Y
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Ford
Chrysler
Oldsmobile
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Honda
Buick
Pontiac
Dodge
Toyota
Nissan
Oldsmobile
Volkswagen
Ford
Ford
Pontiac
Oldsmobile
Geo
Ford
Ford
Cadillac
Honda
Infinite
Plymouth
Eagle
Ford
Volvo
Chevy
Ford
Buick
Mercury
Ford
Plymouth
Oldsmobile
Dodge
Toyota
Buick
Kia
Chevrolet
Buick
Ford
Mercury
Buick
Ford
Model
Taurus
Concorde
88
C-10
Crown Vic
Escort Wa
Civic
Century
Grand Am
Caravan
Corolla
Sentra
Silhouette
Cabriolet
Taurus
F150
6000
Achieva
Prism
Escort
Contour
Deville
Accord
130
Grand Voy
Talon
Ranger
240 GL
S10
Escort
Regal
Sable
Taurus
Acclaim
88
Ram 50
Camry
Century
Sefia
Cavalier
LeSabre
F150
Marguie
ctraPark/
Aspire
Year
2002
1994
1994
1973
1985
1992
2000
1997
1992
2005
1989
1993
2000
1991
1987
1986
1988
1992
1990
1993
1998
1993
1987
1998
1997
1994
1987
1983
1989
1987
1992
1997
2001
1990
1991
1989
1989
1984
2000
1989
1979
1994
1986
1989
1995
Mileage
72,460
169,010
128,005
36,791
265
12,768
35,757
86,421
140,183
18,148
181,867
87,064
85,283
63,817
33,594
37,843
133,718
177,088
176,696
1 1 ,337
118,527
173,073
190,529
49,997
70,127
109,739
1,697
184,215
174,031
78,212
166,826
104,323
30,898
159,311
227,260.90
132,317
269,003
1,870
58,652
58,429
37,590
169,741
36,269
128,599
188,068
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
No
0
No
No
0
0
0
Mot known
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Yes
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
5,000 mile
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
ago
25,000 miles ago
NonOEM
mods
None
March - O>
Tire rods
None
None
Not known
None
Timing bel
None
None
None
None
Newexhai
None
None
None
None
None
Newengin
None
None
None
None
None
New valve
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
New brake
None
None
None
None
None
None
Newstarte
None
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ob
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Mileage at
purchase?
50,000
92,000
21,000
35,000
140,000
Not known
69,000
12,000
100,000
97,000
37,000
Not known
120,000
Not known
103,000
45,000
186,000
30,000
7,000
108,500
Not known
120,000
Not known
Not known
15,000
194,000
90,000
Not known
No
55,000
128,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
once abou
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
100,000m
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
How long?
1yr
Forever
les ago
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Y
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Y
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Honda
Jeep
GMC
MG
Oldsmobile
Honda
GMC
Dodge
Honda
Olds
Volvo
Chevrolet
Dodge
Ford
Pontiac
Buick
Dodge
Toyota
Dodge
Honda
Honda
Honda
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Oldsmobile
Mercedes
Chevrolet
Ford
Chevrolet
Plymouth
Dodge
Toyota
Nissan
Toyota
Nissan
Plymouth
Toyota
Ford
Toyota
Nissan
Toyota
Ford
Jeep
Kia
Chevrolet
Mercury
Model
Accord
Cherokee
Jimmy
MG
Silhouette
Civic
Sierra
Pickup
Civic
Custom Cr
GL
Caprice
Ram
F150
Grand Prix
LeSabre
Stratus
Camry
Durango
Civic
Civic
Accord
Grand Am
Malibu
Silhouette
280 SE
G20
F150
Venture
Voyager
Avenger
Corolla
Sentra
Camrv
Altima
Sundance
Camry
Winstar
Avalon
Maxima
Camry
Taurus
Wrangler
Rio
Caprice
Grand Mar
Year
2001
1995
1990
1978
1997
2000
1995
1968
1997
1984
1984
1987
1997
1993
1989
1990
1996
1997
1999
1998
2001
1992
1994
1999
2002
1973
1993
1997
2003
1991
1996
1989
1997
1990
2000
1989
1998
2001
1996
1997
1999
1998
1997
2004
1990
1988
Mileage
39,000
104,260
130,255
42,913
111,018
46,669
171,362
75,775
8,975
299,695
85,907
152,029
184,963
92,817
59,404
146,571
127,406
92,673
115,362
49,723
75,574
101,517
76,611
40,260
81,517
121,435
115,366
24,907
158,762
124,720
80,740
154,236
202,788
95,296
144,664
127,647
37,914
108,173
1 1 1 ,644
60,271
77,795
94,822
6,248
72,455
87,701
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
No
No
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
4 vrs. ago
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
NonOEM
mods
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Within last
None
None
None
None
None
Muffler rep
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Mileage at
purchase?
36,000
41-42,000
60,000
72,000
75,000
181,000
Not known
21,000
73,000
Not known
34,000
42,000
74,000
95,000
19,000
46,000
50,000
46,000
101,000
94,000
90,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N/A
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
1
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
May
4vrs
1vr.
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Y
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Toyota
Chevrolet
Pontiac
Saturn
Plymouth
Toyota
Ford
Kia
Toyota
Toyota
Oldsmobile
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Saturn
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Toyota
Dodge
Chevrolet
Toyota
Pontiac
Mercury
Chevrolet
Ford
Toyota
Nissan
Mercedes
Ford
Chevrolet
Volvo
Toyota
Saturn
Ford
Oldsmobile
Honda
Model
Pickup
Cavalier
Grand Am
Sedan
Voyager
Camry
Ranger
Sedona
Corolla
Sienna
Cutlass
Lumina
Contour
F150
Wagon
Tracker
Caprice Cl
Escort
Camry
Pickup
Suburban
Corolla
Grand Am
Tracer
Lumina
Taurus
Corolla
Maxima
SEL
Taurus
Astrovan
850 Turto
Camrv
SL1
Taurus
Cutlass
Odyssey
Year
1987
2004
1997
2001
1999
1994
2003
2004
1995
2000
1987
1997
1996
1989
1993
2003
1987
1999
2001
1986
1995
1992
1997
1995
2001
1998
1996
2002
1980
1993
1990
1996
1994
1997
1995
1989
2000
Mileage
225,160
8,412
57,229
63,143
75,474
128,219
11,661
6,336
106,184
131,762
178,755
133,428
98,554
61 ,498
220,816
22,356
29,804
74,087
61,399
47,558
73,823
84,898
120,904
146,952
57,812
91,846
288,774
80,341
185,871
69,356
235,459
81,768
88,207
170,219
70,386
118,171
117,932
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
Over 5,000 miles ago
Drop lifters
NonOEM
mods
Rebuilt Ca
None
Oxygen se
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
N/A
Air flow mf
N/A
5,000 plus
None
New water
None
None
Engine reb
None
None
Transmiss
Screw/bolt
None
None
None
None
None, Nev,
9 months ;
None
None
None
None
None
None
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Mileage at
purchase?
21,000
38,000
10,000
97,000
Not known
125,137
160,000
200,000
Not known
59,000
50,000
82,000
100,000
20,000
Not known
Not known
160,000
30,000
50,000
Not known
Not known
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Lincoln
Ford
Mercury
Pontiac
Toyota
Chevrolet
GEO
Ford
Honda
Nissan
Volkswagen
Ford
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Honda
Honda
Plymouth
Honda
Honda
Toyota
Dodge
Pontiac
Dodge
Mercury
Ford
Chevrolet
Honda
Saturn
Chevrolet
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Dodge
Honda
Jeep
Jeep
Honda
Ford
Saturn
Chevrolet
Dodge
Saturn
Mitsubishi
Mercury
Jeep
Toyota
Toyota
Chevrolet
Saturn
Model
!:ontinenta
F150
Grand Mar
Grand Am
Camry
Avalanche
Prism
Bronco
Accord
Maxima
Cabriolet
Escort
Silverado
300M
Odyssey
Accord
Voyager
Accord
Civic
Corolla
Caravan
Grand Am
Caravan
Sable
F250
Malibu
Civic
SC1
Lumina
Grand Am
Impala
Durango
Civic
Cherokee
Cherokee
Accord
Explorer
LS1
Malibu
Spirit
Sedan
Galant
Grand Mar
Wrangler
Camry
Camry
S-10
Sedan
Year
1995
1989
1994
1998
1996
2002
1996
1990
1997
1990
1999
1995
1976
1999
2000
1997
1998
2001
1991
1995
1997
1989
2000
2002
1979
1999
1996
1996
1998
1997
2003
1999
1998
1998
1995
2000
1995
2000
1998
1990
2001
2001
1991
1997
1994
1994
1995
1999
Mileage
100,945
24,712?
127,716
75,714
164,867
30,880
169,526
49,548
77,793
258,730
38,308
106,984
2,878
90,213
74,582
82,918
168,860
62,342
220,013
107,975
96,428
123,567
85,178
29,493
5,778
79,917
140,462
78,337
79,171
58,079
1 1 ,323
95,983
118,202
137,044
179,113
84,167
162,618
51,713
107,039
9,366
44,243
51 ,756
9,284
97,507
131,858
131,858
124,968
98,556
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
2002
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
Light camf
NonOEM
mods
None othe
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Not known
Valve seat
?, Regular
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
1991 engir
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Leak in thf
None
None
None
None
None
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Mileage at
purchase?
100,000
23,000
60,000
Not known
42,000
Not sure
31,000
Not known
95,000
Not known
68,000
118,000
Not known
?
20,000
66,000
14,510
38,000
38,000
19,000
42,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Rattling?
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y/N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
3 months
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Einck
Chevrolet
Buick
Ford
Geo
Pontiac
Toyota
Plymouth
Saturn
Chevrolet
Buick
Nissan
Ford
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Plymouth
Ford
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Mercedes
Chevrolet
Ford
Dodge
Honda
Jeep
Dodge
Buick
DOdge
Mazda
Cadillac
Ford
Buick
Toyota
Buick
Chevy
Ford
GMC
Ford
Toyota
Chevrolet
Toyota
Acura
Nissan
Chrysler
Ford
Chrysler
Model
Park Aven
Silverado
Century
F150
Prism
Bonneville
Sienna
Voyager
Sedan
Tracker
Regal
Maxima
Taurus
Grand Prix
Mustang
Aerostar
Voyager
Ranger
Crown Vic
Aerostar
Lumina
Contour
Intrepid
Caravan
1500 Pick
Tempo
280
^lonte Carl
Explorer
Ram Pick
Civic
Cherokee
Neon
LeSabre
Caravan
B-2200
Fleetwood
Ranger
Rainer
Pickup
LeSabre
10 Silverai
Ranger
Sonoma
Freestar
Runner SF
Suburban
Sienna
Integra
Frontier
Concorde
Taurus
Concorde
Year
1995
2002
2001
2001
1991
1995
2000
1999
2001
2003
1994
1995
1995
1994
1995
1993
1989
1988
1995
1992
1994
1995
1994
1989
1996
1996
1973
1977
1996
1989
1988
1998
1996
1979
1996
1992
1991
1990
2004
1987
1995
1984
1997
1996
2004
1995
1994
2001
1995
1998
1996
2002
2000
Mileage
144,926
48,135
33,740
93,614
132,317
168,126
137,485
79,222
67,283
29,510
92,169
181,369
139,293
177,915
146,273
147,310
145,299
77,513
179,723
164,552
124,169
104,023
145,942
162,870
124,539
70,388
86,123
36,991
109,585
133,974
207,257
103,057
79,812
40,349
118,345
101,082
97,116
73,983
4,522
232,090
126,028
82,250
118,462
51,855
14,705
85,889
139,565
59,726
80,569
112,513
111,485
26,398
65,322
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
9 months ;
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
?
NonOEM
mods
None
None
None
None
Bought w/r
None
None
None - Fac
?
None
None
None
None - spf
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Newtimint
None
No
None
None
None
Catalytic c
Transmiss
None
None
N/A
None
? - Old vel
Newtransr
None
None
None
None
Newcarto
None
None
None
Clutch ®
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Mileage at
purchase?
40,000
22,000
70,000
110,000
9,780
40,000
160,000
Not known
18,698
104,000
?
40,000
35,000
Not known
Not known
40,000
150,000
60,000
30,000
95,000
119,000
Not known
?
43,000
69,000
?
85,000
87,000
85,000
120,000
78,786
57,000
40,000
30,000
17,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Not Known
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N/A
Unsure
N
N
N
N
N
?
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
11/22/04-
N
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
70,000
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Rattling
Rattling
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Y
Y
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Dodge
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Honda
Chevrolet
Mitsubishi
Dodge
Chrysler
Einck
Chevrolet
Dodge
Dodge
Lincoln
Isuzu
Ford
Honda
Chevy
Mercury
Dodge
Geo
Plymouth
Honda
Chevrolet
Subaru
Pontiac
Ford
Chevrolet
Dodge
Jeep
Dodge
Toyota
Dodge
Lincoln
Isuzu
Oldsmobile
Ford
Dodge
Chrysler
Buick
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
Cadillac
Dodge
Honda
Dodge
Ford
Mercury
Model
Intrepid
F150
Astrovan
Suburban
F150
Civic
Caprice
Montero
Stratus
Concorde
Skylark
Astro Van
Caravan
Caravan
Town car
Pickup
Taurus
Accord
C1500
Marguis
Ram
Tracker
Sundance
CRV
Suburban
Legacy W;
Montanna
Ranger
Tahoe
Caravan
Cherokee
Dakota
Corolla
Intrepid
Town Car
Axiom
Silhouette
F150
Durango
Town & Cc
Park Aven
Dakota
S-10
Country Sc
Deville
Dakota
Odyssey
Caravan
Ranger
Topaz
Year
1993
1989
1992
1994
2001
1992
1982
2003
1999
2002
1994
1993
1992
1998
1991
1995
2001
1997
1996
1994
1995
1992
1992
1998
1999
1993
2003
1998
1996
1996
2000
1999
1995
1995
1988
2002
2002
1992
2002
2001
2000
1998
2001
1986
1992
2004
1995
1998
2002
1994
Mileage
210,281
160,598
217,149
187,394
107,196
124,688
88,587
19,453
108,830
34,223
200,807
205,876
213,485
80,570
188,025
87,207
47,470
101,877
46,702
130,513
93,417
48,696
84,644
76,197
88,892
114,219
49,320
48,200
69,002
161,262
88,505
64,146
103,059
113,898
131,660
46,354
61,160
134,776
28,700
75,537
67,091
49,767
106,227
154,302
155,888
8,619
109,036
122,222
18,741
141,466
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
1999
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
Last year about 30,00
NonOEM
mods
None
Transmiss
None
Rebuilt tra
None
1998Tran
None
None
None
None
Replaced t
None
Head gask
None
None
Cat replac
None
None
None
None
None
None
Door
None
None
None
None
None
New brake
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Newstarte
None
None
None
None
0
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Mileage at
purchase?
201,000
90,000
140,000
60,000
Not known
106,000
68,000
Not known
200,000
82,000
33,000
Not known
Not known
90,000
47,000
72,000
60,000
Not known
46,500
69,000
33,000
33,000
17,000
42,000
66,400
28,000
15,000
Not known
100,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Once
Rattling?
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
How long?
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Rattling
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Y
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chew
Ford
Einck
Chevrolet
Ford
Volvo
Ford
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Chevrolet
BMW
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Ford
Ford
Nissan
Plymouth
Dodge
Mercury
Buick
Saturn
Ford
Ford
Ford
Honda
Ford
Toyota
Pontiac
Ford
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Ford
Buick
Jeep
Mazda
Datsun
Buick
Jeep
Datsun
Honda
Toyota
Buick
Ford
Nissan
Oldsmobile
Ford
Ford
Ford
Oldsmobile
Model
Ranger
Taurus
S-10
Silverado
Taurus
Park Aven
Lumina
Wmdstar
960
Tempo
Blazer
Town & Cc
S10
528E
Corsica
Town & Cc
Ranger
Escort
Pickup XE
Voyager
Caravan
Villager
LeSabre
L-Series
Taurus
Escape
LTD
Accord
Econoline
4 Runner
Sunbird
Escort
Taurus
Winstar
Avalon
Explorer
Regal
Cherokee
Protege
MOWagor
Skylark
Cherokee
280Z
Civic
Camry
Regal
E150
Quest
88
F150
Ranger
F250
Delta 88
Year
1996
1995
1994
1994
1993
1993
1994
1998
1993
1993
1996
2002
1995
1988
1995
1996
1994
1993
1995
1993
1995
1997
1978
2001
1993
2002
1979
1998
2001
1993
1994
1998
1997
1998
1998
1993
1979
1988
1998
1979
1998
1993
1977
1999
1989
1978
1991
1996
1990
1987
2000
1989
1978
Mileage
126,843
203,058
63,894
104,721
119,452
74,419
126,807
146,235
195,994
124,583
93,877
30,315
74,703
287,798
78,735
212,969
122,875
199,926
86,697
166,354
131,298
166,799
81 ,364
56,662
192,185
44,042
65,818
75,052
41,183
178,447
145,852
133,068
97,585
99,271
29,580
47,971
58,560
163,807
85,890
47,098
65,043
116,429
94,772
100,072
168,083
64,563
65,710
125,664
185,678
103,949
33,672
70,610
73,721
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
38,000 mil
40,000 mil
15,000 mil
2002
1997
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
Rod went c
sago
Not sure
Drove car
Drove with
NonOEM
mods
None
None
None
None
Newtransr
None
None
Under war
Transmiss
None
None
None
None
None
Replaced (
Transmiss
Transmiss
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Valve job '
None
no oil.
None
Not that is
None
None
Newtransr
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Mileage at
purchase?
Not known
60,000
15,000
85,000
12,000
13,000
82,000
35,000
54,000
Not known
75,000
69,000
80,000
50,000
5,000
85,000
39,000
26,000
170,000
Not known
100,000
60,000
79,000
27,000
92,000
31,000
127,000
Not sure
133,000
149,000
99,000
Not known
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N/A
N
N
N
N/A
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N/A
N
N
N/A
N
N
N/A
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
1
Once
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Refer to gu
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y/N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Last month
estionare
?
1-2 weeks
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Rattling
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Y
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Chevrolet
Plymouth
Plymouth
Ford
Ford
Ford
Volkswagen
Plymouth
Dodge
Toyota
Chevrolet
Ford
Honda
Acura
Ford
Honda
Kia
Chrysler
Honda
Jeep
Plymouth
Toyota
Dodge
Dodge
Oldsmobile
Plymouth
Volvo
Oldsmobile
Chevrolet
Dodge
Ford
Ford
Nissan
Dodge
Honda
GMC
Nissan
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Buick
Chrysler
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Dodge
Ford
Buick
Ford
Toyota
Chevrolet
Mercury
Model
Suburban
Voyager
Voyager
Ranger
Ranger
Econoline
Beetle
Acclaim
lam Picku|
Camry
Trailblazer
Crown Vic
Accord
TL
Econoline
Odyssey
Sedona
Town & C(
Odyssey
Cherokee
Voyager
Sienna
Caravan
Caravan
Cutlass
Voyager
740
Cutlass
Cavalier
Spirit
Escort
Explorer
Pathfinder
Dakota
Accord
Sonoma
Pickup
Lumina
C20 Picku
Electra Pa
LeBaron
Eldorado
Lumina
Astrovan
Caravan
F250
Century
F150
Pickup
Corsica
Topaz
Year
1997
1999
1992
1992
1992
1996
1973
1989
1987
1999
2002
1989
1989
1996
1986
2002
2004
2002
2003
2001
2003
2001
2002
2003
1990
1988
1987
1980
1995
1989
1987
1994
2001
1987
1988
1995
1988
1990
1977
1990
1988
1990
1990
1989
1988
1982
1990
1988
1989
1989
1989
Mileage
145,130
113,364
154,223
197,429
135,705
203,336
18,484
164,184
23,190
64,126
77,750
62,838
139,955
117,634
87,042
55160
16,601
31,712
44,743
85,959
20,779
80,211
60,774
46,866
97,513
162,866
248,169
79,411
140,492
139,488
128,352
98,966
66,276
112,830
209,194
56,562
220,628
136,296
37,681
169,851
117,003
185,376
123,624
215,900
61,431
85,487
148,951
14,067
262,300
98,988
106,137
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
No
0
No
0
No
No
No
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
1
?
0
0
No
No
0
0
1
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
0
1
No
0
0
No
0
Date of
Last
Rebuild
er 3,000m
N/A
4 years ag
2 yrs ago
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
Needed it
N/A
80,000 miles
NonOEM
mods
None
None
None
Transmiss
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Questiona
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Fuel pump
None
None
None
Muffler rep
None
Head gask
None
See attach
None
None
None
None
None
Wheelchai
None
None
None
None
None
Newmuffe
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Mileage at
purchase?
66,000
98,000
Not known
86,000
110,000
Not known
115,000
29,000
Not known
42,000
90,000
150,000
14,000
78,000
Over 100,1
100,000 pi
90,000
94,000
180,000
16,000
57,000
20,000
97,000
?
45,000
59,000
140,000
129,245
Not known
170,000
Not known
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N/A
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N/A
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Once 3,00
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
+ miles ag
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
How long?
Ever
Within the
3
2 years
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
ast year
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Rattling
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Y
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Toyota
Dodge
Honda
Pontiac
Oldsmobile
GMC
Ford
Toyota
Cadillac
Buick
Chevrolet
GMC
Chevy
Ford
Ford
Ford
Toyota
Oldsmobile
Chevrolet
Ford
Buick
GMC
Chevrolet
Ford
Toyota
Oldsmobile
Chevrolet
Chevy
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Dodge
Ford
Chevrolet
Saturn
Ford
Volkswagen
Mazda
Mazda
Chevrolet
Oldsmobile
Jeep
Chevrolet
Oldsmobile
Ford
Ford
Subaru
Toyota
Ford
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Buick
Honda
Chevrolet
Model
Tercel
Spirit
Accord
Firebird
Delta 88
Vandura
Bronco
Pickup
Fleetwood
Park Aven
;yenne Pic
1500
El Camino
F150
Ranger
F-150
Camry
Cutlass
C-10
F150
Century
Jimmy
Carpice
F150
4x4
Cutlass
Nova
Impala
F150
Malibu
G20 Van
S-10Blazi
Caravan
Ranger
Monte Car
Wagon
Mustang
Thing
B2200
Protege
1500
Cutlass
CJ7
Cavalier
Cutlass
Granada
Aerostar
Forester
Camry
Escape
Grand Prix
Celebrity
LeSabre
Civic
Conversiot
Year
1983
1990
1988
1979
1991
1983
1990
1983
1989
1989
1973
1988
1976
1986
1990
1988
1990
1989
1983
1988
1988
1992
1985
1978
1987
1987
1976
1973
1990
1980
1989
1987
2003
1989
1984
1994
1979
1974
1988
1999
1989
1990
1979
1991
1990
1982
1990
2001
2001
2002
1976
1984
1990
1990
1986
Mileage
87,893
109,922
209,384
45,360
139,412
52,720
104,994
97,627
118,705
146,845
57,468
130,666
61,800
94,729
72,968
62,939
138,226
220,953
98,784
97,153
94,539
90,855
58,223
73,439
169,285
87,003
86,086
94,171
38,797
31 ,245
27,420
153,390
10,184
20,857
68,802
32,325
45,542
81 ,747
220,309
122,960
140,662
85,441
8,509
182,333
71 ,459
64,627
19,631
62,848
46,861
36,201
60,900
64,075
107,868
133,958
33,238
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
0
1
No
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
No
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
No
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
No
No
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
No
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
No
0
0
1
Date of
Last
Rebuild
ess than 2
30,000 mi
Many yrs a
3,000 plus
2 years ag
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
1,000 miles
sago
go
miles ago
30,000 m es ago
NonOEM
mods
None
Newmufflf
None
Carborator
None
Rebuilt tra
None
None
None
Not origina
Transmiss
None
None
New valve
None
None
None
None
Newtransr
None
None
Newtransr
None
None
Newcarto
None
Newtransr
No
No
Newmotot
None
None
None
None
None
None
Newexhai
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Transmiss
None
None
None
Transmiss
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Mileage at
purchase?
20,000
109,000
Not known
96,000
Not known
Not known
85,000
140,000
45,000
93,000
150,000
158,000
115,000
212,000
80,000
83,000
60,000
Not known
Not known
42,000
65,000
85,000
70,000
70,000
Not known
5,000
99,000
6,000
Not known
182,000
53,000
Not known
15,000
45,000
95,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Once
It is totally removed
N
N
N
N/A
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N/A
N/A
N
N/A
N/A
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N/A
N/A
N
N
N
N
N/A
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N/A
N
N
N
N
Once (a wt
Y
Rattling?
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
How long?
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Sunday of this week
Occasiona
Last few m
y
onths
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Y
Customer
Paid
Non-
dealer?
-------
Make
Ford
Ford
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
Ford
Ford
Dodge
Dodge
Ford
Chevy
Dodge
Chevy
Toyota
Nissan
Ford
Dodge
Chevy
Plymouth
Chevy
Chrysler
Jeep
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Ford
Model
100 Rang*
Escort
Impala
ieauville 1
Escape
Focus
G.C.
Caravan
F-150
Astro
Grand Car
Suburban
4 runner
Frontier
F-250
Caravan
Astro
Voyager
Blazer
Voyager
Cherokee
Club Wagi
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Taurus
Year
1978
1998
1985
1979
2005
2005
2003
1992
1995
1994
2000
1997
1998
1998
1995
1995
1992
1992
1993
2002
1996
1989
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
1988
Mileage
58,882
55,293
75,903
84,006
10,511
6,693
47,640
143,963
147,334
133,309
93,154
137,613
115,751
107,607
52,565
136,808
195,068
235,513
164,970
25,981
56,429
13,379
13139
13158
113170
113189
113208
13239
XXX
13266
13303
13323
13352
13370
84450
84461
84480
84507
84536
84544
84578
84606
84624
84651
84697
84741
VIN
Engine Rebuild Info (BKI)
#of
rebuilds
Yes
0
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Date of
Last
Rebuild
1997
Reasons
for Last
Rebuild
NonOEM
mods
Had 200,000 miles
None
Catalytic Converter (BKI)
1. Original
owner?
(Y/N)
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Mileage at
purchase?
130,000
38,000
95,000
80,000
30,000
27,000
100,000
45,000
30,000
42,000
155,000
130,000
35,000
2. Cat been
replaced?
(Y/N)
N
N
# of cat
replcmnts
Rattling?
N
N
How long?
Odo at 1 st
rplcmnt
Odo at
2nd
rplcmnt
Odo at 3rd
rplcmnt
4. Rattling reason
for cat rplcmnt?
Chkeng
light
reason
Fail smog
chk
reason
Collision
damage
reason
Was cat
under
warranty?
Customer
Paid
Non-
dealer?
-------
Comments
Mon OEM Mods - Engine replaced 4/7/04 59,008 miles factory replacement un
Rattling?- Rear
Reject all wheel drive
Rejected 4 wheel drive will not turn off
Had to fill $20 worth of gas to test vehicle
How long? - Squeak in brake
Reject wheel drive - no turn off/on button
Rattling? - Some jerking
Non OEM mods - New spark plugs
Rejected all wheel drive
Rattling? - Getting exhaust done; Mileage # - Different from ERG info
Rattling ? - Some squeaking
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Unknown
Quick Trip
BP
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Citgo
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Chevron
Unknown
Unknown
Quick Trip
Sam's Club
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Shell
Conoco
Sam's Club
Phillips 66
Shell
BP
Shell
Quick Trip
BP
Flying J
Conoco
Texaco
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Unknown
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Unknown
Caseys
Phillips 66
Citco
Conoco
Phillips 66
Conoco
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Date of Last
Oil Change
7/12/03
3 months
3000 mi
7/7/04
7/12/04
5/1/04
3 months,
2200 miles
3/20/04, 5000
miles
3000 miles
4/26/04
7/14/04
5/22/04
7/9/04
5/14/04
4 months
7/12/04
6/1 8/04
7/1/04
90 days
7/13/04
128172
1 year
12000 miles
90 days
14 weeks
Unknown
3400 miles
not since
March
7/16/2004
1 month
3 months
2500 miles
ago
6 months
One month
7/14/2004
7/20/2004
6 weeks ago
7/22/2004
5/1 1/2004
300 miles
3000 miles
2 weeks ago
2000 miles
ago
ago
2 months
7/25/2004
5/18/2004
about June
20th
2000
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Penzoil
Penzoil
Walmart Tech 2000
Penzoil
Penzoil
Penzoil
Quaker State
Valvoline
Walmart Tech 2000
Castrol
Penzoil
Unknown
Valvoline
Unknown
Quaker State high
mileage
MOPAR
Unknown
Castrol
General Motors
Unknown
Unknown
Blank
Unknown
Valvoline
Unknown
Quaker State
Castrol
Quaker State
GTX
Pennzoil
Valvoline
Valvoline
Quaker State
Castrol
Penzoil
Penzoil
Valvoline
Valvoline
Penzoil
Unknown
Super Tech
Castrol
Unknown
Mobil
Unknown
Valvoline
Unknown
SuperTech
Quaker State
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
10W-30
10W-40
10W-40
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-20
5W-30
10W-30
Unknown
10W-40
10W-30
Unknown
5W-20
10W-30
Unknown
10W-40
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
40W
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-40
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Restore
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
None
Replaced Radiator
Engine replaced 4/7/04 at 40,000 miles
None
Ground head and replaced 2 valve seats
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Catalyst converter replaced
None
None
None
None
Cracked head, replaced upper 1/2 of
engine
None
None
None
Replaced 5th gear in transmission
None
Transmission
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
transmission replaced in winter 03
None
Chaned intake manifold gaskets 3 months
ago
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Oil leaks, engine makes noise
None
None
None
None
None
None
exhaust was clogged - leakage of
coolant
None
None
None
No speedometer and no rear
view mirror
None
front driver's side tire is bad and
we're getitng ready to change it
Friday
None
Blank
Blank
When first started there is a
rattling noice possibly from the
catalytic converter
None
None
None
Blank
Blank
None
Blank
None
rough idle cold start then high idle
to throttle to idle down
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
Blank
None
-------
Comments
Rattling?- Muffler loose
Service light turned on
Rattling ? - Frond end - b/c 4 wheel drive has loose parts
Rattling? - Engine light comes on; Mileage - Different from ERG info
Rattling? -Shock
Rattling?- Muffler
Rattling? -When it idles
Rattling? - Fuel pump is rattling
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Phillips 66
Phillips 66
Murphys
Quick Trip
Conoco
Quick Trip
Conoco
Shell
Quick Trip
Conoco
Texaco
Unknown
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Texaco
Quick Trip
Shell
BP
Quick Trip
Conoco
Unknown
Conoco
Quick Trip
Citco
BP
Phillips 66
BP
Quick Trip
Conoco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Conoco
BP
BP
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Diamond
Shamrock
BP
Caseys
Unknown
Quick Trip
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
7/23/2004
5 months ago
7/25/2004
1000
6 months
5/7/2004
May-04
1 year
7/26/2004
3 months
May-04
3-4 months
3 months
5/20/2004
4 months
6/2/2004
7/30/2004
6 months
Unknown
5/25/2004
7/12/2004
2000 miles
ago
2 weeks ago
2 months
2 months
Jun-04
Mar-04
Blank
3200 miles
ago
2000 miles
ago
19-Apr
One month
3 months
5 days ago
71890
2/21/2004
Blank
Jun-04
2 weeks
7/22/2004
July
2 months
4,000 miles
2 months
257058
Jul-04
One month
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Blank
Unknown
Penzoil
Unknown
Wai Mart Brand
Unknown
Motorcraft
Valvoline
Penzoil
Castrol
Riley
Unknown
Firestone
Riley
Unknown
Riley
Quaker State
Quaker State
Unknown
Havoline
Unknown
Quaker State
Unknown
Firestone
Mobil One Synthetic
Penzoil
Penzoil
Blank
Quaker State
Mobil One Synthetic
Penzoil
Penzoil
Firestone
Valvoline Maxlife
Exxon
Firestone
Advanced Auto Parts
Troparctic
Valvoline Sun
Mobil
Unknown
Quaker State
Blank
Unknown
Super Tech
Havoline
Castrol
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-20
10W-40
Unknown
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
Unknown
5W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Blank
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
Unknown
10W-30
Blank
10W-30
10W-30
5W-20
10W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
Blank
None
Lucas
None
None
Unknown
Blank
None
None
None
None
"Sea Foam"
Major repairs within last year
None
Radiator replaced front wheels replaced
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Timing Belt
None
replace radiator; replace power steering
mechanism
brakes, califers,A/C
None
Front Bumper/hood
None
None
None
Unknown
None
Thermostat replaced
None
None
brakes
None
None
Transmission replaced
None
Replaced head gasket
None
None
None
Driver's door replaced, brakes
None
None
Blank
rebuilt transmission
Fuel Pump
New engine
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Replaced fuel pump
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
None
None
None
None
No engine problems. Noise in
drivers from wheel when turn
Ithinktheftiel injectors get
clogged. It doesn't seem to have
the get up & go that it used to.
None
Oil leaking from engine, need
front end alignment
Usually dies on first attempt to
start
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Cutting out a little
Blank
None
None but A/C doesn't work
None
None
drivers side headlight - won't
Blank
Blank
None
Blank
Sometimes gas pedal sticks
Blank
None
Blank
First start of day not as rapid as
when new
Alternator belt broke recently
Blank
Oil pump failure with resulting
seizing
Blank
No problems
None
None
1 motor mont needs to be put on
it
Have to pump accelerator peddle
to start car
idles rough at stop lights
Think we have a defective friel
pump that is new needs to be
taken off and replaced
-------
Comments
Non OEM mods - Past due for oil change by 2 or 3,000 miles
Rattling? - Squeak on driver side front
Rattling? - Some (possible shock)
Rattling? -cracked
PEMSonlv too wide dvne
Rattling?- Muffler
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
BP
Amoco
Diamond
Shamrock
Diamond
Shamrock
Quick Trip
Shamrock
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Blank
Quick Trip
Amoco
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Unknown
Amoco
Quick Trip
BP
Unknown
Phillips 66
Conoco
Quick Trip
Conoco
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Wood Oil
Phillips 66
Unknown
Other
Caseys
Caseys
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Quick Trip
Texaco
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
6/9/2004
8/8/2004
3 months
6 months
2/25/2004
8/4/2004
18 months
24-Apr-04
5 or 6 months
3 months
2-3 months
May-04
2.5 months
2 months
3000 miles
Blank
June 1st
May
Apr-04
May
6/1/2004
2,000 miles
8/7/2004
4 months
9/1 1/2004
while
8/7/2004
May-04
42,000
3 months
5/15/2004
60 days
2000 miles
A month ago
windshield
Unknown
1 month
300 miles ago
2,000 miles
ago
5,000 miles
ago
6/8/2004
1 week/30
miles
8/10/2004
8/21/2004
8/20/2004
3 months
3 months
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Penzoil
Penzoil
Dealer brand
Kendal
Penzoil
Quaker State
Havoline
Quaker State
Wai Mart
Castrol
Unknown
Valvoline
Penzoil
Valvoline
Quaker State
Penzoil
Havoline
Penzoil
Valvoline
Penzoil
Unknown
N/A
Unknown
Wai Mart
Penzoil
generic
Super Tech
Penzoil
Quaker State
Vavoline
Penzoil
Wai Mart
Quaker State
Penzoil
Penzoil
Penzoil
Vavoline
Penzoil
Vavoline
Penzoil
Penzoil
Penzoil
Quaker State
Wai Mart
Penzoil
Penzoil
Penzoil
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
5W-30
10W-30
Blank
10W-30
5W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
Blank
10W-30
20W-50
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
Unknown
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Blank
Refer to sticker
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
Blank
Blank
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
Blank
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
12/03 Engine light - Code P0401 -
Insufficient EGR flow clean intake - install
EGRkit
None
None
None
New transmission 4/23/04
new brakes
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Speedometer gear in transmission
None
Transmission overhaul
None
None
None
None
None
Radiator replaced
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Rebuilt alternator
Yes
Catalytic converter 1 yr 6 months
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
Blank
None
Blank
Blank
None
None
None
Blank
Harmonic Balancer is ratteling
Runs fine
None
Leaks oil and may run hot if idled
for too long
Blank
None
None
Small leak (oil)
High RPMs
None
Blank
None
No problem
None
None
needs adjusted
works well
carbprobs Soil leak
times since January. Problems
None
None
Unaware of any
None
None
None
Blank
Run on after turning off engine
Flat cam, trk will not pull hills or
run at highway speed long
Blank
None
None
None
None
CV Boots & Shafts tie rod ends
None
Blank
None
Blank
Blank
-------
Comments
Mileage at purchase? - Odometer does not work
Rattling ? Stepboard
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Shell
BP
7 Eleven
BP
Conoco
Texaco
Unknown
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Citgo
BP
BP
BP
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
BP
Shell
Quick Trip
Phillips/
Conoco
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Texaco
BP
Phillips/
Conoco
Quick Trip
Shell
Amoco
Conoco
Texaco
BP
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Shell
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
8/14/2004
8/25/2004
Jul-04
Jun-04
6/7/2004
4 months
6,000
2 months
80222 miles
Jun-03
10/16/2003
3,500 miles
4,000 miles
1 year
Unknown
2 months
3 weeks
3 months
8/28/2004
3 weeks
3 weeks
3/17/2004
6 months ?
One month
Mar-04
17-Jul-04
3 months
4 months
8/3/2004
17-Jul-04
2 months
18 months
9/8/2004
3,000 miles
35,252
Mid July
Mar-04
2 months
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Penzoil
Valvoline
Exxon Super HQ
Amoco
Valvoline
Quaker State
Valvoline
Econoline
GM Goodwrench
Penzoil
Penzoil
Valvoline
Valvoline
Texaco
Exxon
Penzoil
O'Reilly
Castrol
Firestone
Castrol
Unknown
Penzoil
Castrol
Valvoline
Penzoil
Penzoil
Penzoil
Quaker State
Penzoil
Penzoil
Quaker State
Quaker State
Penzoil
Motor oil
Valvoline
Valvoline
Jiffy Lube
Havoline
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
5W-20
5W-30
10W-40
1 0W-30
1 0W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
5W-30
Unknown
10W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Pro-Long
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
Leaking water pump replaced
Inner Tie rods
None
None
None
None
timing belt & water pump & clutch ring
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
replace moter & transmission
None
None
None
head gasket replaced
None
None
None
None
just bought the car in August 04
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
None
Engine died on slowing down.
Replaced EGR and oxygen
sensor - runs ok now - March
2004
Blank
None
None
Does not start in neutral
None
None known
None
vehicle generally driven around
town - not suitable for commuting
outside city limits. Vehicle may
run hot, has slow antifreeze leak
Spark plugs are founed - need to
be changed
None
Tune-up Fuel injector needs
cleaning
None known
Check engine light comes on but
goes off after 20 minutes
wiring & computer trouble
None
None
engine/transmission control has
problems with coming out of
torque converter lock up around
43-45 mph
None
Blank
None
Runs a little rough when first
started
None
None - new brake pads
None
some
drivers side window will fall into
door (pliers in quadrant) check
engine light stuck on - no problem
with car
None
None
Needs tune up
None
None
front brakes low, left blinker
broken - must hold down to
activate/operate
engine rod is knocking
Blank
Blank
-------
Comments
Rejected
Cat been replaced? 1-2 years ago
Rattling? -Shocks
Cat been replaced? - over 5,000 miles ago, Rattling reason for cat rplcmnt? - e
Cat been replaced? - over 5,000 miles ago
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Woods Mini
Mart
Conoco
Conoco
Blank
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Woods
Quick Trip
BP
Quick Trip
BP
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Shell
Conoco
Phillips 66
Shell
Conoco
BP
Quick Trip
Unknown
Kwik Stop
BP
Conoco
Quick Trip
Conoco/
Phillips
Phillips 66
BP
Quick Trip
BP
Conoco
BP
Quick Trip
Conoco
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Premium
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
Aug-04
Summer 2004
3 months
Blank
8 months ago
2 months ago
One week
3 months
Jun-04
9
6-Mar-04
1 month ago
7/19/2004
7/1/2004
2.5 months
about 2
months ago -
not sure
Blank
7/10/2004
7/5/2004
3 months
at 120,000
miles
7/27/2003
8/21/2004
5/1 2/2004
7 months?
about 1 ,600
miles ago
Jul-04
approx 3
months ago
2-3 weeks
ago
5-Aug-04
1 ,740 miles
2 months
5/17/2004
6 months
3 months
1 month
Jun-04
6 months
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Mobile
Jiffy Lube
Honda dealer brand
Havoline
Quaker State
Quaker State
Quaker State
Valvoline
Penzoil
Mobile 1
Penzoil
Valvoline
Shell
Shell
Shell
Valvoline
Penzoil
Mobil
Blank
Valvoline
Valvoline orCastrol
Penzoil
Quaker State
Havoline
Unknown
Unknown
Penzoil
Penzoil
Castrol
Valvoline
Penzoil
Quaker State
Blank
Quaker State
Castrol
Quaker State
Valvoline
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
10W-40
H eavy wt
synthetic for
high mileage
cars
Unknown
10W-30
10W-40
10W-40
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
20-50W
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
Unknown
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-20
5W-30
10W-40
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
Oil Additives
None
Bardahl no
smoke
None
None
STP Oil
Treatment
STP Oil
Treatment
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
STP
None
None
Noen
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Prolong
Prolong
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
replaced starter & fuel pump
None
None
None
None
Transmission muffler
None
None
None
None
tierod - right frontAivheel bearings - front
repair rear of car & muffler (car accident)
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
timing belt, wheel bearing, CV boot
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
None
doesnt like to drive > 50/55 mph
None
need to replace muffler & tail pipe
None
None
tend to shake when stopping
check engine light on because
sometimes won't fire on one
cylinder
drivers door latch inside broken
Blank
at an idle when A/C is on it
sputters and loses power -
popping sound when turning
None
None
None
None
Blank
Blank
None
Bad gas - Diamond Shamrock
caused it to miss
We think the oxygen sensor is
out
High temperature at low idle after
highway driving
Blank
None
the check engine light stays on
and so does the brake light
burns a slight amount of oil
None
sluggish very little power
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
-------
Comments
Rattling? - Rotors are warped make noise sometimes, radio works only someti
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Casey's
Unknown
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Conoco
Quick Trip
Cosco
Casey's
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
BP
Cosco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Casey's
Quick Trip
Sinclair
Texaco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Unknown
Texaco
Phillips 66
Texaco
Chevron
Conoco
Texaco
Texaco
Casey's
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
2 weeks
Jun-04
6/14/2004
12-Aug-04
-6,000
2 days
Unknown
1,500
9/9/2004
7/4/2004
5 months
2 months
two weeks
60 days
1,500 miles
previous week
31-May-04
1 month
4 months ago
18-Jul-04
Aug-04
4-5,000 miles
last
November
4/1/2004
2-3 thousand
1,000 miles
2 years ago -
drive only in
summer
18-Aug-04
1 week
167,471
645,819
Jun-03
14-Aug-04
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Penzoil
Valvoline
Kendal
Castrol
Mopar
Kendal
Unknown
Penzoil
Quaker State
Unknown
Unknown
Penzoil
Jiffy Lube
Havoline
Penzoil
Penzoil
O'Reillys Store brand
synthetic
Penzoil
Valvoline
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Penzoil
Trop Artie
Valvoline
Castrol
Kendall
Penzoil
Quaker State
Castrol
Quaker State
Shell
Quaker State
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
Unknown
10W-30
10W-30
we use pure
synthetic
10W-30
10W-30
Blank
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
1 0W-30
5W-30
5W-30
20W-50
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
1 0W-40
10W-30
5W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
fuel injector
additives
(cleaner)
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
None
None
Transmission fluid & filter change & oil
change
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
Head gasket
None
None
It has a new?? (illegible)
None
Fixed leaking water pump
None
None
Blank
None
rebuilt transmission 4/2004
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
Must give a little gas until warm -
watch temp gauge
None
Blank
Shocks need to be changed -
working on it.
None
None
None
None
None
None
muffler
Air flow meter sensor replaced
8/04
Blank
?? (illegible)
None
once in a while it will hesitate
when giving gas to start going
None
None
No emergency brake
Blank
Unknown
exhaust manifold mount
(connection to block) getting
loose
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None - Runs fine
None
None
None
Blank
None
Blank
-------
Comments
Rattling?-??
Different from ERG info; Rattling ? - Both boxes checked (Y/N).
Cat been replaced? - Needs to be
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Shell
Quick Trip
Shell
Unknown
Phillips 66
Casey's
Phillips 66
BP
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Conoco
Philips 66
Texaco
Quick Trip
Unknown
Unknown
Phillips 66
Phillips 66
Diamond
Shamrock
Conoco
Quick Trip
Texaco
Shell
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
Blank
Chevron
Texaco
Unknown
Blank
Casey
Quick Trip
Conoco
Shell
Conoco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Super
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
July
Aug-04
1.5 weeks
Aug-04
2-Jul-04
30,000
2 months
Sep-04
14-Aug-04
1.5 months
ago
Blank
10/26/2004
1,000 miles
Blank
9/28/2004
within 3,000
miles
9/9/2004
7/17/2004
Blank
3,000
800 miles
10/22/2004
1/13/2005
12/29/2004
2,000 miles
2 weeks
Nov-04
Blank
3 weeks
3 weeks
2,000 miles
2,000
10/2/2004
10-Jan-05
150 miles
3 weeks
a month ago
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Unknown
Quick Trip
Ford
Unknown
Texaco
Castrol - Sentech
Unknown
Unknown
Kendall
Penzoil
Blank
Penzoil
Unknown
Unknown
Penzoil
O'Reiley
Unknown
Penzoil
Valvoline
Motorcraft
Quaker State
Penzoil
Valvoline
Castrol
Valvoline
Shell
Shell
Unknown
Penzoil
Penzoil
Quaker State
Castrol
Valvoline
Unknown
Quaker State
Kendall
Unknown
Dealer brand
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
1 0W-30
10W-40
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Blank
10W-30
Blank
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-20
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-40
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
Unknown
None
Blank
Unknown
Blank
N/A
None
None
None
None
None
Penzoil
Synthetic #10
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
Prolong
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
rebuilding engine
None
None
None
None
None
timing ??? Replaced
None
None
Valve seat broke
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
Blank
None
None
None
One morning the engine
continued to idle after I turned off
the ignition - about 1 .45 weeks
ago
None
O2 sensor replaced - drove/run
poorly
Power steering whines
Check engine light comes on
occassionally- O2 sensor
problem 2.5 years ago
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
Had motor tune up (95350) new
platinum plugs - throttle body &
fuel injection cleaned - air & fuel
filter replaced
service engine light stays on
a little unstable in cross winds
Blank
None
None
Unknown
alternator is broke lights strobe
None
Blank
None
The universal belt started
squeeking about 3 days ago,
believe its from the extreme cold
None
Blank
None
Blank
Leaky valve cover gasket
None
None
runs rough when AC is on
Needs to warm up in cold
weather or problem shifting into
drive can occur
-------
Comments
Rattling- Rear shock
Rattling -Occasionally
Rattling- Electrical rattle
Rattling - Some rattling accelerating uphill
Rattling -Not sure
does not have a catalytic converter.
Rattling -Some
Check engine lighten.
Rattling- Some
Rattling- Rarely
Rattling- Some
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Quick Trip
Phillips 66
Quick Trip
BP
Quick Trip
Texaco
Casey's
BP
BP
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
BP
Differs
Texaco
Unknown
Philips 66
Seven-1 1
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Exxon
Unknown
Citgo
Conoco
Quick Trip
Unknown
Sam's
Citgo
Quick Trip
Blank
Phillips 66
Sinclair
Unknown
Conoco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
9/20/2004
11/17/2004
2 weeks
11/28/2004
11/6/2004
1 0/30/2005
3,000 miles
19-Nov-04
2 months
Blank
Oct-04
3 months
27- Dec
2,000 miles
1 2/1 8/2004
2 months
Nov-04
10/31/2004
4 months
June
1 week
2,000 miles
awhile
11/14/2004
1,500 miles
ago
2,200 miles
9/26/2004
1/14/2005
1/20/2005
5,000 miles
4,000
4-Aug-04
2 months
Oct-04
Nov-04
3,000 miles
Unknown
2/1/2005
2 weeks
7/22/2004
12/29/2004
Oil Brand at Last
Change
2804 BFS
Kendall
Penzoil
Quaker State
Valvoline Max Life
Penzoil
Penzoil
Penzoil
Valvoline
Quaker State
MaxLife
Quaker State
Unknown
Unknown
Advanced Auto
Unknown
MaxLife
Valvoline
Quaker State
Jiffy Lube
Penzoil
Blank
cheap stuff
Kendall
Penzoil
Valvoline
Penzoil
Penzoil
Quaker State
Penzoil
Penzoil
GMC
Quaker State
Quaker State
Unknown
Quaker State
GM
Unknown
Castrol GTX
Penzoil
Ford Motor Co.
Penzoil
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
1 0W-40
Unknown
10W-30
5W-30
1 0W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Blank
10W-30
1 0W-30
Unknown
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
20-50
10W-40
Unknown
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
1 0W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-40
Blank
Unknown
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Oil Additives
Sometimes
oil/gas addtive
from Wai Mart
None
None
None
None
Synthetic
None
Sometimes -
Wai Mart Brand
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
Slick 50
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
None
None
None
Transmission rebuilt in October 2004
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Catalyst converter 11/22/04
None
None
None
Fuel Injector
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Converter 7/20/04
None
None
Carburetor rebuilt
Replaced alternator
Replaced alternator
None
None
None
None
None
Transmission repair 10/8/04
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
transmission flush 1 1/22/04;
problems since but not before
Blank
None
None
Blank
None
None
Blank
Check engine lighe always
None
Blank
None
transmission may stick if cold
when shifting into reverse
None
None
Engine ok, no problems. Needs
front end work but sure what &
shocks
None
None
oil leak - needs to be realigned -
pulls to right
None
Sputters when cold
Some fuel injectors need
changing
oil leak and cart problems
Check engine light comes on
occasionally
None
Blank
Check engine light is on - all
fluids topped off, transmission will
slip and is going out
Good driving order
None
None
Transmission does not engage
overdrive
None
Engine knocks badly on specified
lowoctanefuel. Engine stalls at
wide open throttle. Engine runs
poorly when cold.
Blank
None
None
Blank
Blank
ABS system acting up - diagnosis
uncertain
None
None that we are aware of
None
-------
Comments
Rattling -Some
Rattling- Last 2 months
Vehicle has 2 plates
Rattling- Some
Cat been replaced - 3 years ago.
Rattling - Some not all the time
Non OEM Mods - Air bag light stays on.
Non OEM Mods - Transmission leak repaired last fell.
Rattling - Tail pipe loose
Rattling -Some
Rattling - Some when starting
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Quick Trip
Shell
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Total
Quick Trip
BP
Shell
Casey's
Texaco
Conoco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
BP
Shell
Fisca Oil
Shell
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Quick Trip
Walmart
Quick Trip
Casey's
Shell
Shell
Quick Trip
Conoco
Philips 66
Philips 66
Texaco
Costco
Unknown
BP
Shell
Philips 66
Unknown
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
Dec-04
One year
4,000 miles
3 months
1-Feb-05
11/31/04
5 months
Sep-04
Before I
purchased
2/3/2005
1,000 miles
6,000 miles
3 months
2/7/2005
12/11/2004
12/11/2004
Sep-04
11/17/2004
1,500 miles
Dec-04
Oct-04
1-Oct-04
Blank
2/10/2005
12/15/2004
2/8/2005
about 2, 700
miles
less than
1,000 miles
ago
4 months
Jan-05
Unknown
1/18/2005
2,400 miles
1/2/2005
9 months
1/15/2005
2/15/2005
1,000 miles
ago
Dec-04
Due Now
Feb-05
11, 9350 miles
1800
Nov-04
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Havoline
Penzoil
Penzoil
Castrol
Penzoil
Penzoil
Penzoil
Valvoline
Unknown
Chrysler brand
Quaker State
Penzoil
Quaker State
Castrol
Castrol
Castrol
Blank
Valvoline
Penn
Havoline
Havoline
Penzoil
Shell
Mobil
Ford Motor Co.
Penzoil
Quaker State
Valvoline
Penzoil
Havoline
Unknown
Kendall
Valvoline
Quaker State
Quaker State
Unknown
Philips
Penzoil
Havoline
Quaker State
Shell
Castrol GTX
Ford M/C
Unknown
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
5W-20
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
5W-20
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-50
10W-30
10W-30
Under the
hood
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
20W-50
Unknown
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
20W-50
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
5W-20
1 0W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
Lucas Oil
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Marvel Mystery
Oil
None
None
None
None
None
None
STP for Older
Eng
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
Transmission rebuilt
Water pump/muffler
transmission
None
None
None
None
None
None
#1 injector replaced
New water pump & thermostat
Head gasket replaced
None
None
None
None
None
I put a new clutch in
None
None
Transmission leak repaired -seals
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Transmission rebuild, starter, smog pump,
alternator, water pump, rings and seals
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
Blank
Check engine light comes on
after '10 minutes- no noticeable
performance issues
Hood hard to open
Blank
None
None, but needs CV joint
replacement
Needs tune-up, timing
adjustment, carbureator & engine
rebuild, manifold gaskets
Blank
None
None
IAC sluggish on start up after hot
soak
Possible worn valve
None
None
Needs front end alignment,
brakes, catalytic converter leaks
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
Engine will stall at highway speed
(60 mph) until warned up
None
None
Burns Oil
Blank
None
Blank
None
Unknown
None
None
Blank
funny sound when turning
None
Pinging when lower octane fuels
are used
None
Car runs fine
Blank
None
Blank
None
None
-------
Comments
Cat been replaced - over 20,000 miles aqo.
Exhaust system was worked on & repaired about one month aqo not sure wha
Mileage at purchase - 1 00,000 not sure
Non OEM Mods - brakes 3,000 + miles ago. Catalytic Converter- may have sc
Rattling?- Some
Mon OEM Mods - Mass airflow changed August 04, error code may still showC
Cat been replaced? - 3,000+ miles ago
Rattling? -Some
Rattling? - Some © 75 mph
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Quick Trip
Citgo
Sinclair
Philips 66
Philips 66
Quick Trip
Citgo
Quick Trip
Philips 66
Conoco
Philips 66
Quick Trip
was replace
Quick Trip
Wood Oil
Shell
Casey's
Blank
Unknown
Unknown
Philips 66
Shell
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Conoco
Pillions
Shell
Costco
Unknown
Quick Trip
Philips 66
Costco
Unknown
Texaco
Kwik Shop
Shell
Philips 66
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Philips 66
BP
Quick Trip
Sinclair
Philips 66
Conoco
Conoco
Fuel
Grade
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
d ($250).
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
1/22/2005
5 months
7/28/2004
12/12/2004
6 months
Nov-04
Late
December
Dec-04
ago
Nov-04
20-Jan-05
Dec-04
1,500 miles
20-Jan-05
One week
Oct-04
Nov-04
One Month
200 miles
128,198
3,000
2,400 miles
8,000 miles
Jan-05
2/19/2005
Nov-04
1,950 miles
4 months
11/26/2004
-1,400 miles
ago
1,080 miles
12/6/2004
2 months
1 0/20/2004
October
8-Jan-04
3 months
2 months
2,500 miles
6 months
Due now
26-Feb-05
2/14/2005
4/2/2004
9/9/2004
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Valvoline
Quaker State
Unknown
Valvoline
Unknown
Valvoline
Quaker State
Valvoline
Volvo One Synthetic
Mobile One Synthetic
Penzoil
Kendall
Penzoil
Unknown
Quaker State
Penzoil
Valvoline
Unknown
Valvoline
Penzoil
Quaker State
Unknown
Valvoline
Penzoil
Kendall
Quaker State
Quaker State
Havoline
Motorcraft
Penzoil
Quaker State
Quaker State
Penzoil
Valvoline
Havoline
Havoline
Valvoline
Conoco
Castrol
Oriley
Jiffy Lube
Penzoil
Havoline
Quaker State
Quaker State
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Unknown
1 0W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
Unknown
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
Blank
10W-30
1 0W-30
5W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Zero F - Metal
Conditioner
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
STP 2/27
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
replaced alternator
None
Replaced fuel in ector
None
Manifold & head gaskets replaced after
engine overtieated
None
Rebuilt Transmission in April 2004
None
None
Replaced half shaft
None
None
None
Head gaskets, idle air control valve
Ford recall on catalyst
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Muffler/tail pipe installed 2/28/05
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
None
None
Small external coolant leak (head
gasket)
Blank
Check engine light comes on if
drive over 65 mph/checked out
and don't know why
Bad brakes
None
starts rough, check engine light
exhaust leak
engine light always on
None - Although the check
engine soon light came on
Monday 3/21/05
None
None
None
in the last week, it has not shifted
to OD smoothly
Engine knocking
dash rattles when idling
None
None
None
None
Blank
leave transmission shift indicator
in (D) (Overdrive) or it will buck a
lot
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
Bad transmission
None
None. Gas gauge out- good till
300 miles on tripometer
None
None
None
severe backfiring will occur during
do not put down driver's window
None
Blank
None
Small oi leak in front (need to
check this)
None
Blank
Blank
Blank
-------
Comments
Cat been replaced? - Yes, 3,000 plus miles. Reason for cat rplcmnt - plugged.
Rnimri 9 f4/4/f15t and Rnunri 1 5 C19/9/(Ut
Round 2 (4/4/05), Round 1.5 Duplicate (12/17/04), and Round 1.5(12/14/04).
Round 1.5 (1/3/05) and Round 2 (4/2/05). Round 1.5 mileage 75,916.
Dyne test done only. No PEMS precon.
Odometer not working, broke about 7 or 8,000 miles ago.
Mileage at purchase? Put 3 or 4 thousand on
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Quick Trip
Texaco
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
HyVee Gas
Quick Trip
Sam's
Shell
Texaco
Shell
Quick Trip
Sinclair
Quick Trip
Mon OEM Me
Conoco
Costco
Seven-1 1
Shell
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Philips 66
Philips 66
Sinclair
Quick Trip
Conoco
Conoco
Sinclair
Quick Trip
Seven-1 1
Texaco
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Unknown
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Super
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
ds - Steeri
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
Blank
2.5 months
ago
12/18/2004
1/5/2005
Last fall
5 months
2 months
3 months
4 months
1,000 miles
6-8 months
2 months
5 months
9/3/2004
g does not loc
7/1 6/04
1 0/1 6/04
17-Sep-04
1,000 miles
3 months
end of
January
2 weeks
3,000 miles
3/9/2005
3,000 miles
10/10/2004
11/30/2004
9 months
2/26/2005
3 months
3 months
2 years ago
7/22/2003
2/16/2005
6 months
3,000 miles
3/10/2004
4 months
Feb-05
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Penzoil
Penzoil
Valvoline Maxlife
Penzoil
Penzoil
Havoline
Sam's Wholesale
Sam's Wholesale
Quaker State
Quaker State
Unknown
Kendall
Unknown
Castrol
up.
Castrol
Penzoil
Penzoil
Mobil One Synthetic
Unknown
Castrol
Valvoline
Penzoil
Penzoil
10W-40
Penzoil
Quaker State
Quaker State
Texaco
Shell
Shell
Unknown
Valvoline
Car Quest
Havolin Long Life
Motor Craft
Valvoline
Valvoline
Quaker State
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
1 0W-40
5W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
Unknown
"GT-1"
10W-40
5W-20
1 0W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
5W-30
10W-40
10W-30
1 0W-30
5W-30
10W-30
Blank
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
Marel Mystery
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
transmission fluid drain/replaced
None
None
None
None
carburetor rebuilt - tune up, partial motor
rebuild
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Alternator replaced
None
fuel injector
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Right front axel
None
None
Timing belt, knock sensor, gaskets, plugs,
etc.
None
Hose replacement, muffler, tail pipe
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
None
None
None
None- squeaky belt
None
N
Carb idles too hot right now
Leaks oil and trans fluid, runs
great except when very wet may
have trouble starting
None
If it sputters or lags give it a little
gas - open drivers side door from
inside
None - squeaky speedometer
cable
None
None
Slight hesitation occassionally
when shifting from 3 - 4th gear.
Dealer says there is nothing
wrong.
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
Brakes squeak
None
None
Blank
None
Choke/accelerator may stick and
engine race - just nees a quick
depression of accelerator pedal
to undo
None
None
of steering wheel toward driver
transmission. They cleaned out
attempted theft, requires starting
smokes a lot when first
brakes lock if emergency brake is
None
I add oil 1 qt./2-3 months use oil,
no leaking no smoke
None
needs tune up & alignment
-------
Comments
Rattling reason for cat rplcmnt? Engine would not run.
Engine Rebuilt Info - Sheet mising from packet
Gas gauge does not work but has gas in it.
Rattling? -Minor
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Conoco
Conoco
Texaco
BP
Philips 66
Quick Trip
Shell
Quick Trip
Costco
Philips 66
Seven-1 1
Philips 66
Philips 66
HyVee
Casey's
Sinclair
Texaco
Quick Trip
Conoco/
Phillips
Texaco
Costco
Unknown
Unknown
Quick Trip
Flying J
Conoco
BP
Citgo
Quick Trip
Cenex
BP
Wood's Oil
Quick Trip
Unknown
Quick Trip
Casey's
Casey's
Unknown
Quick Trip
Casey's /
Phillips 66
Other
Shell
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Super
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
12 months
5-Mar-05
2,800 miles
less than
1,000 miles
Aug-04
Unknown
3/16/2005
August
1,000 miles
4 months
Jan-05
69,000
9 months
10/26/2004
6/28/2004
89,990 miles
1 year
6 months
about 5,000
miles ago
8 months
Aug-04
3 months ago
10-Mar-05
September
1 month
22-Mar-05
one year
1 0 weeks
2 months
2/12/2005
2 months
-1,000 miles
2,000 miles
10 months
1 month
9 months
Feb-05
2,400 miles
2 months
2,000 miles
ago
@ 106,000
1 month
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Unknown
Mastercare Oil
O'Reilly
Quaker State
O'Reilly
Unknown
Blank
Castrol
Jiffy Lube
Valvoline
Quaker State
Wai Mart
Exxon Superflo
Motorcraft
Penzoil
Quaker State
Motorcraft
Valvoline
Kendall GT-1
O'Reilly
O'Reilly
Penzoil
Penzoil
Valvoline
Valvoline
Citco
Penzoil
Kendall
Penzoil
Advance Auto Parts
Brand
Penzoil
Penzoil
Valvoline
Ford
Castrol
Quaker State
Penzoil
Quaker State
Blank
Spectrum
Spectrum
Unknown
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
30HD
10W-40
10W-30
Blank
10W-40
1 0W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-40
10W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
1 0W-30
1 0W-30
5W-30
10W-30
10W-40
Dealer bulk
syn
SOW
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
10W-30
Blank
5W-30
5W-30
1 0W-30
Oil Additives
None
None
None
1 Pint STP
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
None
carb rebuilt
Rebuilt transmission
None
None
Rebuilt Transmission
None
None
None
None
Rebuilt transmission 3/04
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
replaced transmission
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Transmission
None
head gasket
None
None
None
None
None
None
Distributor
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
Clutch sometimes pops - engine
runs slightly rough
None
None
It needs some carburator work,
probably rebuilder kit
Blank
Bent a-arni right front vibration
while not in park and in motion
none
Bad valve seal on #2 cylinder
fouls spark plug #2 choke doesn't
work on carburetor
None
oil leak under engine
Timing is slightly advanced, runs
a bit rough until warm
Newjoint & valve cover gasket
7/04
Blank
Blank
Runs rough sometimes check
engine light is intermitent
When first start, blue smoke exits
exhaust- 1 short puff
Rough idle
None
Transmission slips a little
sometimes
Needs tune up
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
None
Blank
Sheered distributor pin
Idles fast until gas pedal is
pumped to slow it down. Gas
gauge doesnt work all the time
Excellent
Drips/used oil
Blank
The jeep is very seldom drove, it
may set for several months
transmission seems to slip at
times
Blank
Blank
None
None
None
None
None
-------
Comments
BKI Packet
Owner-provided Fuel and Oil Information, associated with dyne testing
Last Fuel
Purchased
Unknown
Quick Trip
Conoco
Fuel Outlet
Costco
Unknown
Conoco
Quick Trip
Shell
Quick Trip
Quick Trip
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Indolene
Fuel
Grade
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Premium
Regular
Regular
Regular
Date of Last
Oil Change
2 weeks
November
Aug-04
3/28/2005
1/18/2005
Nov-04
2 weeks
500 miles
27-Mar-05
13-Mar-05
6 months
Oil Brand at Last
Change
Penzoil
Quaker State
Firestone
Quaker State
Motorcraft Synthetic
Blend
Unknown
Penzoil
Mobile 1
Valvoline
Penzoil
Quaker State
Oil Viscosity at
Last Change
10W-30
10W-40
10W-40
5W-20
5W-20
5W-30
10W-30
5W-30
10W-40
1 0W-30
1 0W-30
Oil Additives
Blank
None
None
None
Unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
Major repairs within last year
None
Muffler/brakes
None
None
None
Fuel Pump
None
None
None
None
None
Description of Vehicle or Engine
Driveability problems
Blank
Have to get in on passenger side.
Car will "dence" on take off
doesn't die but feels like its not
getting gas
None
None
Blank
A/C doesn't work
None
None
Minor oil leak
None
Blank
-------
v>EPA
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix KK
NuStats Demographics
(For access to this information,
please contact U.S. EPA personnel)
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix LL
NuStats Demographics Data Dictionary
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Household File
SAMPN Household sample number
AREA Area type
1 Urban
2 Suburban
3 Remainder of Area
PHONE Household phone number
HHADDR HH Location Number (unique number for address in LOCATION file)
HCNTY Household County
HHSIZ Household size
HHWRK Employed HH Members age 16+
HHSTU Number of HH Students
HHVEH Household vehicles
UBLSM Bikes used last summer
Value Label
1 YES
2 NO
9 DK/RF
BPLSM1 Purpose of bike usage last summer
1 WORK
2 SCHOOL
7 SOME OTHER ACTIVITY
9 DK/RF
BPLSM2 Purpose of bike usage last summer
1 WORK
2 SCHOOL
7 SOME OTHER ACTIVITY
9 DK/RF
BPLSM3 Purpose of bike usage last summer
1 WORK
2 SCHOOL
7 SOME OTHER ACTIVITY
9 DK/RF
O_BPLSM If other, specify
UBTSM Plan to use Bikes this summer
Value Label
1 YES
2 NO
9 DK/RF
BPTSM1 Planned Purpose(s) for bike usage this summer
1 WORK
2 SCHOOL
7 SOME OTHER ACTIVITY
9 DK/RF
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 1
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
BPTSM2 Planned Purpose(s) for bike usage this summer
1 WORK
2 SCHOOL
7 SOME OTHER ACTIVITY
9 DK/RF
BPTSM3 Planned Purpose(s) for bike usage this summer
1 WORK
2 SCHOOL
7 SOME OTHER ACTIVITY
9 DK/RF
O_BPTSM If other, specify
RESTY Residence type
Value Label
1 One-family house detached from any other house
2 One-family house attached to one or more houses (DUPLEX, ROW
3 Mobile home
4 Building with 2 or more apartments (CONDO, APARTMENT, etc.)
7 Or something else? SPECIFY
9 RF
O_RESTY Residence type, other
HTYPE Household type
Value Label
1 House
2 Apt
3 Mobile Home
4 Other
OWN Home ownership
Value Label
1 Owned by you or someone in this household
2 Rented for cash rent or
3 Occupied without payment of cash rent,
7 Or something else?, SPECIFY
9 RF
O_OWN Home ownership, other
LIVED Lived in residence
Value Label
1 Less than 1 year
2 1-2 years
3 3-5 years
4 6-10 years
5 More than 10 years
9 RF
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 2
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
INCOM Income
Value Label
1 $0-$14,999
2 $15,000-$24,999
3 $25,000 - $34,999
4 $35,000 - $49,999
5 $50,000 - $74,999
6 $75,000 or more
9 DK/RF
ASSN Travel assignment number
533 Monday, February 2
534 Tuesday, February 3
535 Wednesday, February 4
536 Thursday, February 5
537 Friday, February 6
540 Monday, February 9
541 Tuesday, February 10
542 Wednesday, February 11
543 Thursday, February 12
544 Friday, February 13
548 Tuesday, February 17
549 Wednesday, February 18
550 Thursday, February 19
551 Friday, February 20
554 Monday, February 23
555 Tuesday, February 24
556 Wednesday, February 25
557 Thursday, February 26
558 Friday, February 27
561 Monday, March 1
562 Tuesday, March 2
563 Wednesday, March 3
564 Thursday, March 4
565 Friday, March 5
568 Monday, March 8
569 Tuesday, March 9
570 Wednesday, March 10
571 Thursday, March 11
572 Friday, March 12
575 Monday, March 15
576 Tuesday, March 16
577 Wednesday, March 17
578 Thursday, March 18
579 Friday, March 19
582 Monday, March 22
583 Tuesday, March 23
DAY Travel day
Value Label
1 Monday
2 Tuesday
3 Wednesday
4 Thursday
5 Friday
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 3
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
GPSINT GPS Study - indicated interest in participating
Value Label
1 YES
2 NO
9 NOT ELIGIBLE
GPSDATA GPS Data Available (code provided by GeoStats after GPS unit retrieved)
*Forthis interim delivery, just noting those hhlds that received gps units.
Value Label
1 Yes
HTRIPS Household trips
VP Valid Partial (if hhsize>4 and 1 person didn't complete travel log)
1 Yes
OUTLOOK1 Importance of Sidewalks in your neighborhood
Value Label
1 very unimportant
5 very important
OUTLOOK2 Importance of Neighborhood bike paths
Value Label
1 very unimportant
5 very important
OUTLOOKS Importance of conveniently located bus stops
Value Label
1 very unimportant
5 very important
OUTLOOK4 Importance of uncongested roadways
Value Label
1 very unimportant
5 very important
OUTLOOKS Importance of Timely updates about traffic tie-ups
Value Label
1 very unimportant
5 very important
OUTLOOK6 Importance of neighborhood input of road construction projects affecting neighborhood
Value Label
1 very unimportant
5 very important
OUTLOOK? Importance of bus information in English and Spanish (bilingual only)
Value Label
1 very unimportant
5 very important
GRADE1 Rating of Sidewalks in your neighborhood
Value Label
1 Excellent (A)
5 Failing (F)
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 4
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
GRADE2 Rating of Neighborhood bike paths
Value Label
1 Excellent (A)
5 Failing (F)
GRADES Rating of conveniently located bus stops
Value Label
1 Excellent (A)
5 Failing (F)
GRADE4 Rating of uncongested roadways
Value Label
1 Excellent (A)
5 Failing (F)
GRADES Rating of Timely updates about traffic tie-ups
Value Label
1 Excellent (A)
5 Failing (F)
GRADE6 Rating of neighborhood input of road construction projects a
Value Label
1 Excellent (A)
5 Failing (F)
GRADE? Rating of bus information in English and Spanish (bilingual
Value Label
1 Excellent (A)
5 Failing (F)
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 5
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
Person File
SAMPN Household sample number
PERNO Person Number
WADD Work address location number (if employed) - use to link to address info in location file
SADD School address location number (if student) - use to link to address info in location file
RELAT Relationship to main household respondent
Value Label
0 REFERENCE/RESPONDENT/SELF
1 SPOUSE/PARTNER
2 CHILD
3 PARENT
4 GRANDPARENT
5 GRANDCHILD
6 OTHER RELATIVE
7 NOT RELATED
9 RF
GEND Gender
Value Label
1 MALE
2 FEMALE
9 RF
AGE Age
Value Label
98 98 years old or older
99 M DK/RF
HISP Are you Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish? (asked only if RESP=0)
Value Label
1 YES
2 NO
9 RF
ETHN Ethnicity (asked only if RESP=0)
Value Label
1 White
2 African American, Black
3 Asian
4 American Indian, Alaskan Native
5 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander?
6 MULTIRACIAL
7 HISPANIC/ MEXICAN
97 OTHER, SPECIFY
99 RF
O_ETHN Ethnicity,other
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 6
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
ACTWK Status (age 16+)
Value Label
1 Working
2 Temporarily absent from a job or business
3 Looking for work
4 A homemaker
5 Going to school
6 Retired
7 Or doing something else?, SPECIFY
8 Don't Know
9 Refused
O_ACTWK Status (age 16+), other
VOLUN Volunteer Status (age 16+ and ACTWK>2)
1 Yes
2 No
9 DK/RF
EMPLY CALCULATED - Employed (ACTWK<3 OR VOLUN=1)
Value Label
1 Yes
2 No
FTPT Full time or part time status
Value Label
1 FULLTIME
2 PART TIME
3 NO, DIDN'T WORK AT ALL
9 RF
OCCUP Occupation
Value Label
1 Sales or service
2 Clerical or administrative support
3 Manufacturing, construction, maintenance, or farming
4 Professional, managerial, or technical
7 OTHER, SPECIFY
9 RF
OJDCCUP Occupation, other
WNAME Name of employer
WLOC Work location flag
Value Label
1 HOME
2 ADDRESS GIVEN
8 DK
9 RF
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 7
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
WTYPE Work land use classification
Value Label
1 Office Building
2 Retail
3 Industrial/Manufacturing Site
4 Medical
5 Educational
6 Residential
7 OTHER, SPECIFY
9 RF
O_WTYPE Work land use classification, other
PKST1 If needed to park at work, street 1
PKST2 If needed to partk at work, street 2
WMODE Mode typically used to get to work (if WLOO1)
Value Label
1 WALK
2 BIKE
3 AUTO / VAN/ TRUCK DRIVER
4 AUTO / VAN / TRUCK PASSENGER
5 TRANSIT
6 LOCAL PARATRANSIT OPERATORS
7 SCHOOL BUS
8 TAXI/ SHUTTLE
9 RF
WPARK Pay to park
Value Label
1 YES
2 NO
3 EMPLOYER PROVIDED
8 DK
9 RF
PAYPK Amount paid to park (if WPARK=1)
WPPER Pay method
Value Label
1 PER HOUR
2 PER DAY
3 PER WEEK
4 PER MONTH
5 PER YEAR
6 DK
7 RF
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 8
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
EDUCA Highest level of education attained
Value Label
1 Not a high school graduate, 12 grade or less
2 High school graduate (high school diploma or GED)
3 Some college credit but no degree
4 Associate or technical school degree
5 Bachelor's or undergraduate degree
6 Graduate degree (includes professional degree like MD, DDs,
7 OTHER, SPECIFY
9 DK/RF
O_EDUC Highest level of education attained, other
STUD Student status
Value Label
1 YES
2 NO
9 DK/RF
SCHOL Type of school attending
Value Label
1 DAYCARE
2 NURSERY SCHOOL, PRE-SCHOOL
3 KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
4 GRADE 9 TO 12
5 TECHNICAL/VOCATION SCHOOL
6 2 YEAR COLLEGE (COMMUNITY COLLEGE)
7 4-YEAR COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY
97 OTHER, SPECIFY
99 DK/RF
O_SCHOL Type of school attending, other
SNAME School name
TRAVL Reported travel on travel day
Value Label
1 Traveled
2 Did Not Travel
3 Out of Area
NOGO Reason for no travel (travel=2)
Value Label
1 personally sick
2 caretaking sick kids
3 caretaking sick other
4 homebound (elderly or disabled)
5 worked at home for pay
6 worked around home (not for pay)
7 other
O_NOGO Other reason for non-travel
PTRIPS Number of person trips reported on travel day
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 9
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
Vehicle File
SAMPN Household sample number
VEHNO Vehicle Number
YEAR Vehicle Year
Value Label
8888 M DK/RF
9999 M Refused
MAKE Vehicle Make
Value Label
1 Acura
2 Audi
3 Bmw
4 Buick
5 Cadillac
6 Chevrolet
7 Chrysler
8 Dodge
9 Ford
10 Geo
11 Gmc
12 Harley Davidson
13 Honda
14 Hyundai
15 Infiniti
16 Isuzu
17 Jaguar
18 Jeep
19 Kawasaki
20 Kia
21 Lexus
22 Lincoln
23 Mazda
24 Mercury
25 Mercedes
26 Mitsubishi
27 Nissan
28 Oldsmobile
29 Plymouth
30 Pontiac
31 Porsche
32 Range Rover
33 Saab
34 Saturn
35 Subaru
36 Suzuki
37 Toyota
38 Volkswagen
39 Volvo
40 Yamaha
41 Daewoo
97 Other, Specify
98 Dont Know
99 Refused
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 10
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
0_MAKE Vehicle Make, Other
MODEL Vehicle Model
BTYPE Vehicle Body Type
Value Label
1 Auto/Car/Station Wagon
2 Van(Minivan, Cargo, Passenger)
3 Sport Utility Vehicle/SUV
4 Pick Up Truck
5 Other truck
6 RV
7 Motorcycle
97 Other
O_BTYPE Vehicle Body Type, other
FUEL Vehicle fuel
Value Label
1 Gas
2 Diesel
7 Other (Specify)
9 Refused
O_FUEL Vehicle fuel, other
CIGAR Cigarette lighter/power outlet
Value Label
1 Yes
2 No
9 DK/RF
NHMD Non-HHId member drove vehicle on travel day
1 Yes
2 No
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 11
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
Trip File
SAMPN Household sample number
PERNO Person Number
PLANO Place number
LOCNO Location identifier (link to location file for address information)
PTYPE Place type
Value Label
1 Home
2 Work
3 School
4 Other Place within study area, specify name of the place
5 Out of Area, specify city and state
ARRJHR Arrival hour
ARR_MN Arrival minute
DEPJHR Departure hour
DEP_MN Departure minute
LTYPE Land Use type of place
Value Label
1 Office
2 Retail
3 Industrial Or Manufacturing
4 Medical
5 Education
6 Residential
7 Other (Specify)
9 DK/RF
O_LTYPE Land Use type of place, other
MODE Travel mode
Value Label
1 Walk
2 Bike
3 Driver-Auto/Van/Truck
4 Passenger-Auto/Van/Truck
5 Transit
6 Links Paratransit/Dial-A-Ride
7 School Bus
8 Taxi/Shuttle
97 Other, specify
99 Refused
VEHNO If auto-driver or auto-passenger, hh vehicle number used
(note: can link on sampn/vehno to see vehicle information for hh vehicle used)
Value Label
97 Non-Hh Veh Used
WITHP People in vehicle with you
Value Label
1 Yes
2 No
9 DK/RF
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 12
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
WAHHM HH Members with you?
Value Label
1 Yes
2 No
9 DK/RF
OTHTR Non-HH Members with you?
Value Label
1 Yes
2 No
9 DK/RF
NUMHH Number of HH members traveling with you
NONHH Number of non-hh members in travel party
TOTTR Total in travel party (computed as NUMHH + NONHH + 1)
PERTP Person #s for hh members on Trip
TOBUS If used transit, # blocks walked to get on bus
Value Label
99 Refused
FRBUS If used transit, # blocks walked once got off bus
Value Label
99 Refused
TRANS If used transit, # of transfer
Value Label
99 Refused
WHTTR If transferred, where? (corresponds to look-up list)
O_WHTTR If transferred, where? (if not on list, what was intersection?)
ACT1 Main Activity at this place
Value Label
1 Work At Home
2 Non-Work At Home Activities
3 Work
4 Work-Related
5 Pick-Up Or Drop-Off Passenger At Work
6 School
7 School Related
8 Pick-Up Or Drop-Off Passenger At School
9 Quick Stop
10 Shopping
11 Visit
12 Personal Business
13 Eat Meal
14 Entertainment
15 Recreation Or Fitness
16 Civic Or Religious
17 Pick-Up Or Drop-Off Passenger At Other Location
18 Change Mode Of Transportation
97 Other
99 Refused
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 13
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
TRPDU Calculated trip duration
ACTDU Calculated activity duration
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 14
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
Location File
LOCNO Location number (links to HHADD, WADD, SADD, or LOCNO)
LOCTY Location type
Value Label
1 Home
2 Work
3 School
5 Other place
6 Out of area
NAME Name of place
ADDR Place address
XSTRT Cross street nearest place
LAND Landmark
CITY City
CNTY County
STATE State
ZIP Zip code
AV_STA Geocoding status
Value Label
C On-Screen Matched
L Landmark File Match
M Matched
O Out of Area
U Unmatched
XCORD X coordinate
YCORD Y coordinate
FIPS County FIPS code
TRACT Census tract
TAZ Traffic analysis zone
AV_ADD Address corresponding to xcord and ycord
AV_ZONE Geocoding zone corresponding to xcord and ycord (typically zip)
Kansas City Travel Survey -Data Dictionary page 15
Revised 4/1/04, NuStats
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix MM
Gas Diesel Split Study
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
1 Variations in Speciated Emissions from Spark-Ignition and Compression-Ignition
2 Motor Vehicles in California's South Coast Air Basin
O
4 Eric M. Fujita*, Barbara Zielinska, David E. Campbell, W. Patrick Arnott, John C. Sagebiel,
5 Lynn Rinehart a and Judith C. Chow
6 Desert Research Institute Division of Atmospheric Sciences
7
8 Peter A. Gabele b, William Crews c and Richard Snowc
9 Source Apportionment and Characterization Branch, MD-46
10 National Exposure Research Laboratory
11 c Bevilacqua-Knight, Inc., MD-8
12 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
13 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
14
15 Nigel N. Clark and W. Scott Wayne
16 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
17 West Virginia University
18 123/125 Engineering Sciences Building
19 P.O. Box 6106
20 Morgantown, WV 26506
21
22 Douglas R. Lawson
23 National Renewable Energy Laboratory
24 1617 Cole Blvd.
25 Golden, CO 80401
26
27 * Corresponding author, phone: (775) 674-7084; fax: (775) 674-7060; e-mail:
28 Eric.Fujita@dri.edu.
29 a Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
30 b Retired
31
32
33 ABSTRACT
34
35 The DOE Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study examined the sources of uncertainties in using an
36 organic compound-based chemical mass balance (CMB) receptor model to quantify the
37 contributions of spark-ignition (SI) and compression-ignition (CI) engine exhaust to ambient fine
38 particulate matter (PM2.5). This paper presents the chemical composition profiles of SI and CI
39 engine exhaust from the vehicle testing portion of the study. Chemical analysis of source
40 samples consisted of gravimetric mass, elements, ions, organic and elemental carbon (OC and
41 EC) by both the IMPROVE and STN thermal/optical methods, poly cyclic aromatic
42 hydrocarbons, hopanes, steranes, alkanes, and polar organic compounds. Over half the mass of
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
43 carbonaceous particles emitted by heavy-duty diesel trucks was EC (IMPROVE) and emissions
44 from SI vehicles contained predominantly OC. While total carbon (TC) by the IMPROVE and
45 STN protocols agreed well for all samples, the STN/IMPROVE ratios for EC from SI exhaust
46 decreased with decreasing sample loading. SI vehicles, whether low or high emitters, emitted
47 greater amounts of high molecular-weight particulate PAHs (benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno(l,2,3-
48 cd)pyrene, and coronene) than CI vehicles. Diesel emissions contained higher abundances of 2-
49 to 4-ring semi-volatile PAHs. Diacids were emitted by CI vehicles, but are also prevalent in
50 secondary organic aerosols so they cannot be considered unique tracers. Hopanes and steranes
51 were present in lubricating oil with similar composition for both gasoline and diesel vehicles and
52 were negligible in gasoline or diesel fuels. CI vehicles emitted greater total amounts of hopanes
53 and steranes on a mass per mile basis, but abundances were comparable to SI exhaust normalized
54 to TC emissions within measurement uncertainty. The combustion-produced high-molecular
55 weight PAHs were found in used gasoline motor oil but not in fresh oil and are negligible in used
56 diesel engine oil. The contributions of lubrication oils to abundances of these PAHs in the
57 exhaust were large in some cases and were variable with the age and consumption rate of the oil.
58 These factors contributed to the observed variations in their abundances to total carbon or PM2.5
59 among the SI composition profiles.
60
61 IMPLICATIONS
62 We examined several factors that contribute to variations in chemical composition of PM2.5
63 emissions from in-use diesel and gasoline vehicles in California's South Coast Air Basin. These
64 factors included model year, mileage accumulation, vehicle test cycles, composition of
65 lubrication oils and variations in sampling and analytical methods. Distinctive differences were
66 found in the abundances of specific chemical species in diesel and gasoline exhaust, but the
67 variations among individual exhaust profiles were large. These variations should be considered
68 when applying specific profiles in receptor modeling or emission inventory development and in
69 estimating the uncertainties associated with the results.
70 ABOUT THE AUTHORS
71 Eric Fujita and Barbara Zielinska are Research Professors, David Campbell is an Assistant
72 Research Scientist, John C. Sagebiel is an Assistant Research Professor, and Judith Chow is a
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
73 Research Professor in the Division of Atmospheric Sciences at the Desert Research Institute
74 (Nevada System of Higher Education). William "Pat" Arnott is an Associate Professor in the
75 Department of Physics at the University of Nevada, Reno. Lynn Rinehart is a post-doctoral
76 fellow in the Atmospheric Science Department/Cooperative Institute for Research in the
77 Atmosphere at Colorado State University. Douglas R. Lawson is a Principle Scientist at the
78 National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Nigel N. Clark is a Professor and W. Scott Wayne is a
79 Research Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at West Virginia
80 University. Peter A. Gabele is retired from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. William
81 Crews and Richard Snow are with Bevilacqua Knight, Inc. Address correspondence to: Eric M.
82 Fujita, Division of Atmospheric Sciences at the Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway,
83 Reno, NV, 89512; phone: (775) 674-7084; fax: (775) 674-7060; e-mail: Eric.Fuiita@dri.edu.
84 INTRODUCTION
85 Motor vehicle emissions are important sources of ambient air pollution and have been
86 statistically associated with cancer and non-cancer health effects.1"2 Vehicle exhaust is a
87 complex mixtures of particulate matter (PM), gaseous pollutants and semi-volatile organic
88 compounds (SVOC) that are in equilibrium with the particle phase. Several studies have been
89 conducted recently to characterize the emission rates and organic speciation of PM from gasoline
90 (or spark-ignition, SI) and diesel (or compression-ignition CI) vehicles.3"12 The rate and
91 chemical composition of gaseous and paniculate emissions from diesel and gasoline vehicles
92 depend upon many factors, which include vehicle age and mileage, fuel, emission control
93 technology, state of vehicle maintenance, type and condition of lubricating oil, vehicle operating
94 mode (e.g., cold start, hot stabilized), engine load, and ambient temperature.Data from
95 dynamometer exhaust emission tests of properly functioning light-duty gasoline vehicles show
96 that modern, low-mileage vehicles have low carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon, and particulate
97 matter emission rates during hot stabilized operation and during relatively non-aggressive
98 driving conditions.13'14 Emission rates are higher for properly functioning vehicles during cold
99 starts, during intermittent high engine load conditions induced by hard acceleration and grade
100 and at low ambient temperatures.10'13'14 The distribution of emission rates among in-use vehicles
101 is highly skewed with a relatively small fraction of high emitters accounting for a
102 disproportionate fraction of total emissions.4'15'16
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
103 Receptor models have been widely used to estimate the contributions of various sources
104 to measured airborne particulate matter concentrations.3'5. Current understanding of the
105 uncertainties associated with receptor modeling calculations is limited by data to sufficiently
106 characterize the variations and representativeness of source composition profiles, especially for
107 motor vehicles. The Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study was conducted during the summer of 2001
108 to assess the sources of uncertainties in using organic-compound-based chemical mass balance
109 (BMV) receptor model to quantify the relative contributions of emissions from SI and CI engines
110 to the ambient concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The impetus for the study was
111 the disparate conclusions obtained from studies in the Los Angeles area and the Northern Front
112 Range of Colorado regarding the relative contributions of SI and CI vehicles to ambient
113 concentrations of fine particles.3'5'6 Studies conducted in Denver indicated that gasoline
114 combustion from mobile sources contributed more to ambient PM than diesel combustion.
115 However, studies conducted in Los Angeles indicate that diesel combustion contributed more
116 than gasoline combustion to ambient PM.
117 Key components of the design for the Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study included
118 characterization of the variations in exhaust composition within vehicle categories, the
119 differences in determination of elemental carbon by two alternative methods, and comparability
120 between multiple laboratories in the analysis of organic species. The study called for researchers
121 from the Desert Research Institute (DRI) and the University of Wisconsin Madison (UWM) to
122 work cooperatively on sample collection and quality assurance aspects of the study, but work
123 independently, at least initially, on chemical analysis and data analysis. This current study did
124 not necessarily seek to reconcile the results of the prior studies, but was intended to examine the
125 range of uncertainties that may be associated with the methods and procedures for sample
126 collection, chemical analysis, and source apportionment. This paper presents the source
127 composition profiles derived by the DRI. It examines variations in the relative abundances of
128 OC, EC, and potential molecular markers in SI and CI exhaust relative to the factors that may be
129 associated with the observed variations. The ambient source apportionment results obtained by
130 DRI and associated uncertainties are described elsewhere.17'18
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
131 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
132 As part of this collaborative study, Bevilacqua-Knight, Inc. (BKI) with the U.S. Environmental
133 Protection Agency (EPA) and West Virginia University (WVU) conducted dynamometer tests of
134 light-duty gasoline-powered vehicles and heavy-duty diesel-powered vehicles, respectively. The
135 vehicle emission tests were conducted at the Ralphs Grocery distribution center in Riverside, CA
136 during summer of 2001 from June 2 to June 23 for light-duty vehicles, and from July 20 to
137 September 19 for heavy-duty diesel vehicles. The vehicle selection and test protocols, vehicle
138 characteristics, and dynamometer systems are described by EPA and BKI and WVU.19'20 Details
139 of the testing program that are pertinent to the development of exhaust composition profiles are
140 summarized here.
141 Light-Duty Vehicle Testing
142 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and BKI conducted dynamometer tests on
143 their transportable Clayton Model CTE-50-0 chassis dynamometer for 57 light-duty gasoline
144 vehicles and two light-duty diesel vehicles in the eleven combined model-year and mileage
145 categories shown in Table 1. Table SI, located in the supplemental information section, gives the
146 make, model, model year, mileage, and PM2.5 emission rates for each vehicle.
147 Regulated emissions were determined with a constant volume sampling system (CVS)
148 and continuous monitors for carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), total hydrocarbons
149 (THC), and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). BKI tested each vehicle using a modified Unified Driving
150 Cycle (UDC) that consisted of a phase 1 plus phase 2 from a cold start, a ten minute soak,
151 followed immediately by a repeat of the phase 1 (i.e., phase 3) plus phase 2 from a warm start. A
152 pair of time-integrated samples was collected for each vehicle, one during phases 1 and 2 of the
153 test cycle ("cold start" sample) and a second during the repeat of phases 1 and 2 after the ten-
154 minute soak ("warm start" sample). The warm start test was repeated for eight vehicles to
155 investigate the reproducibility of the emissions. In two of the replicate tests a set of parallel
156 samples was collected from a smaller residence chamber with a volume equal to 20 percent of
157 the main chamber (60 liters) to investigate the extent of particle coagulation and condensation.
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
158 One composite sample was collected for each model year and mileage group in
159 categories 1 through 4 by sampling all vehicles within each category through the same sampling
160 media ("media composite"). Samples were collected on separate media for vehicles in all
161 remaining vehicle categories and combined in the laboratory according to the scheme shown in
162 Table SI. Selection of samples within the composites were based on a target minimum combined
163 mass loading of 1 mg of OC, which was estimated by subtracting the photoacoustic black carbon
164 (BC) from gravimetric mass. The analytical composites also combined samples with similar
165 BC/PM2.5 ratios. Other relevant chemical characterizations included lubricating oils from each
166 vehicle and representative fuel samples from nearby service stations. The lubrication oil samples
167 were analyzed by DRI for organic constituents and by Gregory Poole Laboratories in Raleigh,
168 NC for elements by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis.
169 Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Testing
170 West Virginia University (WVU) tested heavy-duty diesel trucks and diesel buses on their
171 transportable heavy-duty vehicle emissions testing laboratories. Thirty trucks were selected for
172 testing in the twelve combined vehicle weight (light-heavy, medium-heavy and heavy-heavy)
173 and model year categories shown in Table 2. Fifteen trucks were newer model year, well-
174 maintained fleet vehicles. The remaining fifteen trucks were a mix of vehicles in typical service.
175 Two transit buses were also tested with one transit bus representing older engine technology and
176 one representing newer engine technology. All 30 trucks were operated over three duty cycles
177 for purposes of developing composition profiles, the City-Suburban Heavy Vehicle Route
178 (CSHVR), the highway cycle (HW), and idle operation. The two buses were operated through
179 the CSHVR, an idle period, and the Manhattan test cycle. WVU recorded continuous emissions
180 levels of NOx, THC, CO, and CO2. PM mass emissions were measured using two parallel filter-
181 sampling trains. PM emissions were also continuously measured by WVU using a Tapered
182 Element Oscillating Microbalance. An oil sample was withdrawn from each engine tested, and
183 analyzed by DRI for organic constituents.
184 A set of time-integrated samples was collected in parallel by DRI and UWM for each test
185 cycle run on each vehicle. When possible, the secondary dilution ratio was adjusted to
186 compensate for variations in the emission rate of the vehicles. Table S2, in the supplemental
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
187 information section, gives the make, model, model year, mileage, and PM2.5 emission rates for
188 each vehicle, and shows which samples were combined into composite samples. Analytical
189 results for the idle tests are not shown because mass loadings were too low to yield useable data.
190 Sample Collection and Continuous Measurements
191 DRI provided a secondary dilution sampler that was capable of collecting diluted exhaust
192 samples from the primary dilution tunnels of the EPA and WVU transportable dynamometers.
193 The DRI dilution sampler was tested by Chang et al.21 and is based on a similar sampler
194 originally designed by Hildemann et al.22 Emissions were withdrawn from the primary exhaust
195 dilution tunnel through a heated Teflon line to the dilution sampler. In the sampler the exhaust
196 mixed with dilution air under turbulent flow conditions, to cool and dilute the exhaust to near-
197 ambient conditions. Ambient air filtered through a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter
198 and an activated carbon bed was used for dilution. The secondary dilution was adjusted to ratios
199 between 20 and 50 for diesel testing. Several diesel trucks were also retested without secondary
200 dilution as part of another project. Due to the large range of emission rates for different test
201 cycles and vehicles, the optimal sampling rate could not always be achieved for all sampling
202 media. For example, sample loading was excessive in some samples for TOR carbon analysis but
203 was optimal for organic speciation. In general, the range of PM emissions for diesel trucks were
204 lower than expected resulting in many diluted exhaust samples with near or below detection
205 quantities for most organic species. For SI vehicles, the secondary dilution sampler was used
206 without dilution (i.e., as a residence time chamber only) due to the low PM emission rates
207 expected for most SI vehicles.
208 Sample air from the secondary dilution sampler was distributed to the various samplers
209 from a conical aluminum plenum with 12 exit ports distributed radially around its base. From the
210 residence chamber the samples were drawn through cyclone separators with a cut-off diameter of
211 2.5 um, operating at 113 1pm, and collected using a DRI sequential filter sampler for inorganic
212 species, and the DRI sequential fine particulate/semi-volatile organic compound (PSVOC)
213 sampler for organic species (10). Samples were also collected by UWM in parallel with DRI
214 from the same sampling plenum. Aerosol samples were collected by DRI on the following
215 media: Gelman (Ann Arbor, MI) polymethylpentane ringed, 2.0 um pore size, 47 mm diameter
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
216 PTFE Teflon-membrane filters (#RPJ047) for particle mass, elements and water soluble chloride,
217 nitrate, sulfate, ammonium; Pallflex (Putnam, CT) 47 mm diameter pre-fired quartz-fiber filters
218 (#2500 QAT-UP) for organic and elemental carbon; and Pallflex (Putnam, CT) T60A20 102 mm
219 diameter Teflon-impregnated glass fiber TIGF) filters followed by a cartridge of 20-60 mesh
220 Amberlite XAD-4 (Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.) sandwiched between two polyurethane
221 foam (PUF) plugs for organic speciation. A 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) cartridge (Sep-
222 Pak) sampler for carbonyl compounds, a Tenax sampler for hydrocarbons in the range of Cg to
223 C2o, and a canister sampler for C2-Ci2 volatile organic compound speciation were added to the
224 sample train during light-duty passenger vehicle testing as part of the California Regional
225 PMio/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) source characterization project.23
226 PM2 5 mass was monitored during the dynamometer tests for all SI and CI vehicles using
227 a tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM), particle light scattering with a DustTrak
228 nephelometer, and particle absorption using a photoacoustic instrument 24'25 to examine changes
229 in emission rates and ratios of black carbon to PM2.5 with varying operating conditions.17 The
230 continuous monitors also sampled from the same secondary dilution plenum connected to the
231 primary dilution tunnel, both for gasoline and diesel vehicles. Continuous measurements of
232 DustTrak light scattering provided immediate feedback about the nature of the emissions from
233 vehicles and identified portions of the driving cycles where particulate emissions are greatest and
234 least. They were also useful in determining whether the dilution tunnel had been adequately
235 flushed between measurements. The continuous data were time-averaged and accumulated (in
236 real-time) to provide total black carbon emissions and total particle emissions for use in
237 comparison to the elemental carbon data from Thermal/Optical carbon analysis of the quartz
238 filter and gravimetric mass analysis of the Teflon filters.
239 Periodic dynamic blank samples were collected during both phases of the vehicle testing
240 program to characterize the dilution air used in BKFs constant volume dilution system (PDP-
241 CVS) and in the combined WVU primary dilution system and DRI secondary dilution sampler.
242 The blanks also characterize any sampling artifacts that may have been introduced by
243 components of the sampling system. The methods used to collect these blanks were identical to
244 that used for the vehicle exhaust samples except that no vehicle dynamometer test was run. The
245 use of dynamic blanks for subtracting background contributions is not straightforward with
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
246 regard to development of source composition profiles that include organic carbon and speciated
247 organic compounds. Examination of the continuous light scattering and adsorption data for three
248 of the SI dynamic blanks indicates that residual levels drop off rapidly and do not strongly
249 influence the average concentration of the hour-long blank samples. Similar results were
250 obtained for the CI dynamic blanks. We note that the primary dilution air was HEPA filtered to
251 remove atmospheric background. Some of the organic carbon in the blanks may be an artifact of
252 SVOCs desorbing off the walls of the sampling system and adsorbing on the quartz filter.
253 Desorption of SVOCs is favored in the equilibrium process of passing clean dilution air through
254 the sampling system. Furthermore, subtracting the dynamic blank concentrations of PAHs
255 essentially eliminates the heavier PAHs from the speciation profile for many of the low-
256 emitting, late model low mileage SI vehicles and lower emitting CI vehicles. Additionally, many
257 of the PAHs with positive values have large relative uncertainties. Based upon these
258 considerations, the profiles developed by DRI for study for subsequent receptor model
259 calculations are reported here without dilution tunnel blank corrections. However, all samples
260 were corrected for field/transport blanks. Results for the dilution tunnel blanks are provided in
261 the supplemental information section.
262 Analytical Methods
263 Prior to use, sampling media were pre-cleaned as follows: quartz fiber filters were baked for
264 several hours in a muffle furnace at 900°C, and TIGF filters were cleaned by sonication for 10
265 minutes in dichloromethane (CH2C12) twice, with the solvent replaced and drained, and sonicated
266 for 10 minutes in methanol twice with the solvent replaced. New XAD-4 was washed with
267 liquinox soap and rinsed with hot water, followed with DI water and technical grade methanol
268 (3-4 times). The XAD-4 was then extracted using a Dionex Accelerated Solvent Extractor
269 (ASE) with dichloromethane (CH2C12) at 1500 psi and 80°C, followed by acetone. It was then
270 dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C, and stored in clean 1L glass jars that were placed in aluminum
271 cans with activated charcoal. PUF plugs were cleaned by first washing with distilled water,
272 followed by Dionex ASE extraction for 15min/cell with acetone at 1500 psi and 80°C, followed
273 by 10% diethyl ether in hexane under the same conditions. The extracted PUF plugs were dried
274 in a vacuum oven at 50°C for approximately 3 days or until no solvent odor was detected, and
275 stored in clean 1L glass jars with Teflon-lined lids wrapped in aluminum foil. Each batch of
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
276 precleaned XAD-4 resin and -10% of precleaned TIGF filters and PUF plugs were checked for
277 purity by solvent extraction and GC/MS analysis of the extracts. The PUF plugs and XAD-4
278 resins were assembled into glass cartridges (10 g of XAD between two PUF plugs) and stored at
279 room temperature prior to shipment to the field. All samples were shipped back to DRI in
280 coolers at approximately 4°C and stored in a freezer prior to extraction.
281 Weighing was performed on a Cahn 31 electro microbalance with ±0.001 mg sensitivity.
282 Unexposed and exposed Teflon-membrane filters were equilibrated at a temperature of 20 ±5 °C
283 and a relative humidity of 30±5% for a minimum of 24 hours prior to weighing. The charge on
284 each filter is neutralized by exposure to a polonium source for 30 seconds prior to the filter being
285 placed on the balance pan. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was performed on Teflon-
286 membrane filters for elemental analysis using a Kevex Corporation Model 700/8000 energy
287 dispersive x-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analyzer.26 Chloride (Cl"), nitrate (NCV), and sulfate
288 (SO4~) ions were measured with the Dionex 2020i (Sunnyvale, CA) ion chromatograph (1C).
289 The Dionex system contains a guard column (AG4a column, Cat. No. #37042) and an anion
290 separator column (AS4a column, Cat. No. #37041) with a strong basic anion exchange resin, and
291 an anion micro membrane suppressor column (250' 6 mm ID) with a strong acid ion exchange
292 resin. The anion eluent consists of sodium carbonate (Na2COs) and sodium bicarbonate
293 (NaHCO3) prepared in distilled, deionized water. A Technicon (Tarrytown, NY) TRAACS 800
294 Automated Colorimetric System (AC) was used to measure ammonium concentrations by the
295 indolphenol method.
296 Elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) were measured by thermal optical
297 reflectance (TOR) method using the IMPROVE (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual
298 Environments) temperature/oxygen cycle (IMPROVE TOR).27'28 Samples were also analyzed
299 according to the Speciation Trends Network (STN) Protocol using a thermal/optical
300 transmittance (TOT) instrument (29). In both methods, samples are collected on quartz filters. A
301 section of the filter sample is placed in the carbon analyzer oven such that the optical reflectance
302 or transmittance of He-Ne laser light (632.8 nm) can be monitored during the analysis process.
303 The filter is first heated under oxygen-free helium purge gas. The volatilized or pyrolyzed
304 carbonaceous gases are carried by the purge gas to the oxidizer catalyst where all carbon
305 compounds are converted to carbon dioxide. The CO2 is then reduced to methane, which is
10
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
306 quantified by a flame ionization detector (FID). The carbon evolved during the oxygen-free
307 heating stage is defined as "organic carbon". The sample is then heated in the presence of helium
308 gas containing 2 percent of oxygen and the carbon evolved during this stage is defined as
309 "elemental carbon". Some organic compounds pyrolyze when heated during the oxygen-free
310 stage of the analysis and produce additional EC, which is defined as pyrolyzed carbon (PC). The
311 formation of PC is monitored during the analysis by the sample reflectance or transmittance. EC
312 and OC are thus distinguished based upon the refractory properties of EC using a thermal
313 evolution carbon analyzer with optical (reflectance or transmittance) correction to compensate
314 for the pyrolysis (charring) of OC. Carbon fractions in the IMPROVE method correspond to
315 temperature steps of 120°C (OC1), 250°C (OC2), 450°C (OC3), and 550°C (OC4) in a
316 nonoxidizing helium atmosphere, and at 550°C (EC1), 700°C (EC2), and 850°C (EC3) in an
317 oxidizing atmosphere. The temperature steps in the STN thermal evolution protocol are 310°C,
318 480°C, 615°C, and 900°C in a nonoxidizing helium atmosphere and 600°C, 675°C and 825°C, in
319 an oxidizing atmosphere. The STN method uses fixed hold times of 45 to 120 seconds at each
320 heating stage and IMPROVE method uses variable hold times of 150-580 seconds so that carbon
321 responses return to baseline values.
322 Thermal optical analysis of ambient samples by IMPROVE and STN protocols generally
323 yield equivalent total carbon but STN EC is often less than IMPROVE EC.30'31 Because EC and
324 OC are operationally defined by the method, the specific instrument used, details of its operation,
325 and choice of thermal evolution protocol can influence the split between EC and OC.32'33 Visual
326 examination of filter darkening at different temperature stages have shown that substantial
327 charring takes place within the filter, possibly due to adsorbed organic gases or diffusion of
328 vaporized particles. The filter transmittance is more influenced by within-filter charring, whereas
329 the filter reflectance is dominated by charring of the near-surface deposit. TOR and TOT
330 corrections converge in the case of only a shallow surface deposit of EC or only a uniformly
331 distributed pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC) through the filter and diverge when EC and POC
332 exist concurrently at the surface and are distributed throughout the filter, respectively, especially
333 when the surface EC evolves prior to the POC. The difference between TOR and TOT partly
334 depends on the POC/EC ratio in the sample.30 Thus, highly loaded source samples would yield
335 similar EC values for TOR and TOT corrections, while lightly loaded source and ambient
336 samples would typically yield different EC values. While EC values for TOR may tend toward
11
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
337 higher EC due to underestimation of the POC correction, higher absorption efficiency of POC
338 within the filter may tend toward lower EC values for TOT.
339 For organic compound speciation, PUF/XAD/PUF cartridges and TIGF filters were
340 extracted and analyzed together, except for CI blanks, idle cycle tests and selected samples with
341 low PM loadings, which were extracted and analyzed separately. Prior to extraction, the
342 following deuterated internal standards were added to each filter and cartridge pair:
343 naphthalene-dg, acenaphthylene-dg, phenanthrene-dio, anthracene-dio, chrysene-d^, pyrene-dio,
344 benz[a]anthracene-di2, benzo[a]pyrene-di2, benzo[e]pyrene-di2, benzo[k]fluoranthene-d-i2,
345 benzo[g,h,i]perylene-di2, coronene-di2, cholestane-dso, and tetrocosane-dso. Filters and XAD-4
346 were extracted with dichloromethane, followed by acetone, using the Dionex ASE. Since PUF
347 media degrade when extracted with dichloromethane, the PUF were extracted twice with acetone
348 using the Dionex ASE. The extracts were then combined and concentrated by rotary evaporation
349 at 20 °C under gentle vacuum to ~1 ml and filtered through 0.45 mm Acrodiscs (Gelman
350 Scientific). The extract was concentrated to 1 ml and split into two fractions: (1) the first fraction
351 was precleaned by the solid-phase extraction technique using Superclean LC-SI SPE cartridges
352 (Supelco) with sequential elution with hexane, and hexane^enzene (1:1).34'35 The hexane
353 fraction contained the non-polar aliphatic hydrocarbons, and hopanes and steranes, and the
354 hexane/benzene fraction contained the PAH. These two fractions were combined and
355 concentrated to -100 jiL and analyzed by GC/MS technique for hydrocarbons, hopanes, steranes,
356 PAH and oxy-PAH. The second fraction was utilized for the polar compound analysis without
357 precleaning. It was derivatized using a mixture of bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and
358 pyridine to convert the polar compounds into their trimethylsilyl derivatives. The second fraction
359 was evaporated to 100 (jl under moisture filtered ultra high purity nitrogen and transferred to 300
360 (jl silanized glass inserts (National Scientific Company, Inc.). Samples were further evaporated
361 to 50 (jl, and 25 (jl of pyridine (Pierce), 25 (jl of internal standard mixture (succinic acid d-4,
362 myristic acid -627, and 1,2,4-butanetriol), and 150 |il of BSTFA with 1 % TMCS [N, O-bis
363 (trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide with 1% trimethylchlorosilane (Pierce)] were added. The
364 glass insert containing the sample was put into a 2 ml vial and sealed. The sample was then
365 placed into a thermal plate (custom made) containing individual vial wells at 70 °C for 3 hours.
366 The calibration solutions were freshly prepared and derivatized just prior to the analysis of each
12
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
367 sample set, and then all samples were analyzed by GC/MS within 18 hours to avoid degradation.
368 Analysis of the polar organic compounds and the internal standards added are described
369 elsewhere.36'37
370 Samples were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), using
371 Varian CP-3800 GC equipped with a CP8400 autosampler and interfaced to a Varian Saturn
372 2000 Ion Trap operating in electron impact (El) ionization mode (for PAH, oxy-PAH,
373 hopanes/steranes and alkanes) or chemical ionization (CI) mode, using isobutene as an ionization
374 gas (for polar compounds). Concentrations were quantified by comparing the response of the
375 deuterated internal standards to the analyte of interest.10 It should be also noted that due to the
376 lack of authentic standards, most of the hopanes/steranes are identified tentatively (with
377 exception of hop!9, hop23 and ster45, for which standards were available), based on the
378 available literature data.34'35'38"40 Diesel fuel and gasoline and diesel lubrication oil samples were
379 obtained from the vehicles immediately after emissions sampling and were analyzed for PAH
380 and hopanes/steranes. The fuel and oils were cleaned and fractionated prior to analysis using the
381 method described by Wang, et al.34'35 and detailed elsewhere.10
382 RESULTS
383 The 30 SI and 8 CI individual or analytical composite samples were further combined into six
384 composite SI and four composite CI exhaust profiles as shown in Table 3. The SI composite
385 profiles consist of low and high emitters for both "cold" (SI_LC and SI_HC, respectively) and
386 "warm" (SI_LW and SI_HW) emission tests. Incremental cold start profiles were obtained by
387 subtracting the warm samples from the corresponding cold samples, but the analytical
388 uncertainties are too high for them to be useful in receptor modeling. A separate pair of
389 composite profiles was also derived for vehicles with higher proportions of elemental carbon
390 (SI_BC and SI_BW). MDD is the composite of all available speciation data for light-heavy and
391 medium-heavy trucks. HCS and HW are composites exhaust profiles for heavy-heavy trucks on
392 the City Suburban Heavy Vehicle Route and Highway Driving Cycles, respectively. HDD is the
393 composite of the HCS and HW profiles. In several tests, secondary dilution of diesel exhaust
394 resulted in insufficient amounts of sample for quantitative analysis of many organic species.
395 These samples were excluded from the composite profiles. Samples collected for idle tests were
13
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
396 all below detection. The composite profiles combine samples with similar PM2.5 emission rates,
397 EC/TC ratios, and abundances of hopanes, steranes and three of the high-molecular weight
398 PAHs, benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene and coronene, that are potential markers for
399 SI exhaust. The speciated emission rates are listed for the composite profiles in Table S3, located
400 in the supplemental information section. These profiles were subsequently used in CMB receptor
401 modeling to estimate the relative contributions of SI and CI exhaust to ambient carbonaceous
402 particles in California's South Coast Air Basin.18
403 Fine Particle Mass, Ions and Metals
404 The average PM2.5 emission rates for SI vehicles on the UDC were 27.2 mg/mile (251.9
405 maximum) for cold start tests and 16.9 mg/mile (207.9 maximum) for warm start tests. The
406 distribution of PM2 5 emissions for the 57 test SI vehicles is highly skewed with 10 percent that
407 were the highest emitters accounting for 62 and 69 percent of the cumulative emissions for cold
408 and warm tests, respectively. Average PM2.5 emission rates for heavy-duty trucks were 404
409 mg/mile (1125 maximum) on the hot city-suburban route cycle and 187 mg/mile (520 maximum)
410 on the highway cycle. The distribution of PM2 5 emissions for heavy-duty trucks is less skewed
411 than light-duty SI vehicles with 12 percent of the trucks accounting for 30 percent of the
412 cumulative emissions for the hot CSHVR cycle.
413 The fractions of non-carbonaceous species to the total PM2.5 in the composite profiles
414 were negligible for both spark-ignition and diesel vehicles. Silicon and ammonium sulfate were
415 dominant in the samples for light-duty vehicles in groups 1-4. Since these are major constituents
416 of the ambient atmospheric PM, they are likely entrained through the vehicle's air filter. Zinc,
417 calcium, and phosphorus, which are the dominant elements in lubricating oil, were present in all
418 samples. The emission rates of these elements for SI vehicles, shown in Figure la, are highly
419 variable with a range spanning nearly three orders of magnitude (maximum of 11.8 and
420 minimum of 0.015 mg/mi). However, the relative proportions were constant, indicating that
421 lubrication oil is likely the common source of these elements. The emissions distribution was
422 highly skewed with most 1990 and newer SI vehicles emitting less than 0.1 mg/mile of the three
423 elements and most pre-1990 SI vehicles showing higher emissions. The range of emission rates
424 of these elements was not as large for CI exhaust (Figure Ib). The lower range was comparable
14
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
425 to pre-1990 SI vehicles and the upper end was comparable to the highest emitting SI vehicles.
426 The relative emissions of the three elements were more variable in CI exhaust with lower
427 proportional amounts of phosphorus with increasing emissions. While there is a general tendency
428 toward higher PM2.5 emissions with greater emissions of zinc, calcium and phosphorus, the
429 correlations were weak.
430 Carbon Composition
431 Over half the mass of carbonaceous particles emitted by heavy-duty diesel trucks is
432 elemental carbon, as illustrated in Figure 2. The EC/TC ratios for the combined light and
433 medium heavy-duty diesel trucks (MDD) and the heavy heavy-duty diesel trucks (HDD) were
434 both 0.62 (IMPROVE TOR method) with about two-thirds of the EC in the EC2 fraction. By
435 comparison, the EC/TC ratios among the SI composite profiles were lower and more variable.
436 PM2.5 emissions from SI vehicles with higher emission levels contain predominantly OC with
437 EC/TC ratios of 0.17 and 0.12 for cold and warm start tests, respectively. The EC/TC ratios for
438 lower emitters were 0.31 for both cold and warm start tests. SI vehicles emitted a larger fraction
439 of EC as EC1 than CI vehicles. Table 3 shows that there were a few moderate to high-emitting SI
440 vehicles with EC/TC ratios that were comparable to heavy-duty diesel trucks (0.56 for cold start
441 test and 0.53 for warm start test) with higher fractions of EC in the EC2 fraction.
442 EC and OC are operationally defined parameters and may vary with the specific
443 instrument and protocol used. The scatterplots in Figure 3 for TC and EC show that
444 measurements by the IMPROVE TOR and STN TOT protocols agree well for highly loaded
445 samples. However, the STN TOT/IMPROVE TOR ratios for EC decrease with decreasing
446 sample loadings. The divergence between the two methods occurs for lightly loaded SI samples.
447 Figure 4 shows scatterplots of STN versus IMPROVE EC measurements for all CI (top left) and
448 for SI (top right) samples. The same two plots are shown for lower exhaust concentrations in the
449 bottom panels. While the two methods agree for CI samples for the entire range of exhaust
450 concentrations, IMPROVE TOR EC is higher relatively to STN TOT EC in SI samples at lower
451 exhaust concentrations. The effect of variations in EC measurements by the two methods on the
452 CMB source apportionments is discussed elsewhere.18
15
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
453 The continuous photoacoustic light absorption measurements showed that all vehicles
454 tested, including late model spark ignition vehicles, had black carbon emissions.17 For SI
455 vehicles, black carbon and PM2.5 emission rates can be two to eight times larger during the cold
456 start phase than during hot stabilized operation. Relatively clean spark ignition vehicles have
457 black carbon emissions that occur during the more aggressive portions of the driving cycle, with
458 maximum emissions typical during cold start and a secondary peak during aggressive
459 acceleration, which are both associated with fuel/air ratio enrichment. Figure 5 shows examples
460 of the variations in light absorption during the test cycle for very clean, normal, and visibly
461 smoking SI vehicles, and a light-duty diesel vehicle. The 'clean' and 'normal' vehicles had
462 greatest emission concentrations in the first 5 minutes of phase 1 (cold start), and the similar
463 driving cycle after 35 minutes in the phase 3 warm start produced much lower emissions.
464 Virtually all of the PM emissions from "normal emitters" come from the first few minutes during
465 a cold start and from hard accelerations with relatively higher amounts of black carbon produced
466 during both cold starts and hard accelerations.
467 Distribution of Organic Compounds in Exhaust and Lubricating Oil
468 Figure 6 presents the emission rates (ug/mile) of higher molecular-weight poly cyclic aromatic
469 hydrocarbons (PAH) that are mostly particle-associated in the composite diesel and gasoline
470 exhaust. Gasoline vehicle exhaust contains higher proportions of the 6-and 7-ring PAH,
471 indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene, benzo[ghi]perylene and coronene in comparison with diesel exhaust.
472 This is consistent with the comparative composition of PAH emissions that have been reported in
473 previous studies.10'41 In contrast, diesel emissions are enriched in 2- to 4-ring semi-volatile
474 PAHs, including primarily particle-associated chrysene and benz(a)anthracene.
475 Benz(a)anthracene is relatively reactive PAH, thus it is not a suitable tracer for diesel emissions.
476 However, chrysene is a stable PAH and is mostly particle associated at ambient conditions.
477 Chrysene correlates well with IMPROVE TOR EC for the four composite diesel profiles (r2=
478 0.97).
479 While several 6 and 7-ring PAH are potential markers for gasoline exhaust, their relative
480 abundances to total carbon emissions were variable. PAHs in lubricating oils may be one
481 possible explanation of this variability. In a previous study, we reported that these PAHs are
16
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
482 found in used gasoline motor oil but not in fresh oil and are negligible in used diesel engine oil.10
483 Combustion-produced PAH can escape from the combustion chamber past the piston rings with
484 the blow-by gases that can absorb into the crankcase oil. We postulate that the concentration of
485 PAH in the lubrication oil increases with mileage accumulation until the next oil change.
486 Consequently, emissions of PAH may also depend on the rate of consumption and age of the
487 lubrication oil as well as the vehicle operating conditions that directly produce PAHs during
488 combustion. Figure 7 shows the concentrations of the same eight higher molecular weight PAHs
489 in diesel fuel and diesel and gasoline vehicle lubrication oils (in |ig/g). Gasoline lubrication oils
490 contain higher concentrations of these PAH in comparison with diesel fuels or oils. This is
491 consistent with previous results.10 Note that while the absolute concentrations of PAHs vary in
492 the gasoline vehicle lubricating oil, their proportions to each other are consistent.
493 Hopanes and steranes are compounds present in crude oil as a result of the decomposition
39
494 of sterols and other biomass. These compounds are present in lubricating oils, but not in the
10
495 fuels. They have been used as molecular markers for vehicle emissions and are higher in
496 vehicles that emit oil.10'38"40 Figure 8 shows the emission rates of individual hopanes and
497 steranes for the composite diesel and gasoline vehicle profiles. Table S3 explains the
498 mnemonics. CI composite exhaust profiles contain higher amounts of lower molecular weight
499 hopanes and steranes, while the SI exhaust profiles have a more even distribution by molecular
500 weight. This result is inconsistent with previous studies that have shown similar composition of
501 hopanes and steranes in SI and CI exhaust.10 As noted earlier, the results for most CI vehicle
502 samples have higher uncertainty due to the higher dilution ratios used in sample collection. Some
503 CI samples have the expected patterns of hopanes and steranes, but were not included in the
504 composite profile due to invalid analytical results for other species (e.g., invalid carbon data due
505 to overloaded quartz filter).
506 Figure 9 shows the comparison of hopanes and steranes profiles in the lubricating oils
507 and in the CI and SI vehicle exhaust. The composition of steranes and hopanes are similar in SI
508 vehicle exhaust to that in lubrication oil, especially for steranes. Thus, we estimate lubricating oil
509 emission rates for SI vehicles by assuming that all steranes present in emissions are from the
510 lubrication oil and are not destroyed during the combustion process. The lubrication oil emission
511 rates (Oil Em) were calculated from the following equation:
17
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
512 Oil Em (g/mile) = Sem (|ig/mile)/S01i (|ig/g) (1)
513 where Sem is total steranes emission rate from the SI vehicles and S0ii is the total concentration
514 of steranes in the lubrication oil of the corresponding vehicle. The emissions of PAHs that
515 originate from the lubrication oil can be estimated from equation (2):
516 PAH emitted with oil (|ig/mile) = PAHoii (|ig/g) * Oil Em (g/mile) (2)
517 The ratio of PAHs originating from the oil to total PAHs in the exhaust gives the fraction
518 of PAH in the emissions that are associated with oil. Table 4 shows the results calculated for the
519 same eight and three (indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene, benzo[ghi]perylene and coronene) higher mw
520 PAH, for SI vehicles. The contribution of lubrication oil to emissions of PAHs ranges from 0.2%
521 to 79% and from 0.1% to 55% for eight and three PAHs, respectively. This contribution depends
522 upon two key factors: (1) the vehicle's oil consumption rate; and (2) time and mileage since the
523 oil was last changed. For example, two SI vehicles from category 7 (SI_7C2 and SI_7C3) are
524 not the highest lubrication oil emitters (67 and 96 mg/mile, respectively, as compared to over
525 300 mg/mile for vehicle SI_10C3), but the PAH contributions from the lubrication oil are the
526 highest among the SI group. This suggests that these two vehicles are excessive oil emitters.
527 Indeed, the OC/TC ratio is also the highest for these two vehicles (91 and 93%, IMPROVE
528 method). The highest lubrication oil emitter, vehicle SI_10C3 (358 mg/mile) has only moderate
529 contribution of heavy PAH from the lubrication oil (5% for three PAH) but its lubrication oil was
530 only 8 days old and the concentrations of these PAH in the oil were relatively low (See Figure
531 7). Vehicles from category 10 are high PM emitters, but the PAHs in the exhaust are formed
532 mostly during the combustion process with a relatively minor contribution from the lubrication
533 oil. It should be noted that the lubrication oil emissions calculated according to the equation (1)
534 are often higher than the PM2.5 emissions. However, not all components of burned oil are in
535 particulate matter as some may be too volatile to condense on the particles or may be destroyed
536 during the combustion process.
537 Aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons were measured in vehicle emissions only. We
538 quantified 15 n-alkanes (from C14 to C28), 5 branched alkanes: norfarnesane (2,6,10-
539 trimethylundecane), farnesane (2,6,10-trimethyldodecane), norpristane (2,6,10-
540 trimethylpentadecane), pristane (2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane), phytane (2,6,10,14-
18
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
541 tetramethylhexadecane), and 14 n-alkylcyclohexanes (from C7- to C20-cyclohexane). Table S-3
542 lists the emission rates of these alkanes and, in addition, a sum of n-alkylcyclohexanes for
543 composite CI and SI vehicles. It is clear from this table that the emission rates of these
544 compounds are much higher for CI than SI vehicles. In fact, only high-emitting SI vehicles,
545 especially in hot start mode, emit any significant amounts of branched and cyclic hydrocarbons.
546 This is true for n-alkanes as well. For CI vehicle exhaust, n-alkanes, branched alkanes and n-
547 alkylcyclohexanes constitute approximately 60-80%, 6-20% and 6-30%, respectively, of total
548 aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbons. For SI vehicles, these percentages are more spread out, but for
549 the higher emitting vehicles, they are in the same range. All five branched alkanes are present in
550 the spark ignition high-emtting cold and warm (SI_HC and SI_HW) profiles as well; thus they
551 are not unique tracers for diesel vehicle exhaust.
552 Polar compounds were measured in the vehicle emissions only. Table S-3 lists the
553 emission rates of several polar compounds: tridecanoic acid (alkanoic acid), succinic and glutaric
554 acid (alkanedioic acids), maleic acid (alkenedioic acid), phthalic and isophthalic acid (aromatic
555 diacid). The emission rates of these compounds are much higher for CI than SI vehicles. It is
556 interesting to note that diacids that are often considered as atmospheric transformation products
557 are emitted by CI vehicles.43"48 Thus, these compounds are not unique tracers for either vehicle
558 exhaust or secondary organic aerosols.
559 DISCUSSION
560 The results of this study are generally consistent with other recent vehicle exhaust emission
561 characterization studies.4"7' 10'n PM emissions of most SI vehicles were relatively low compared
562 to CI vehicles, especially in hot-stabilized mode. The PM2.5 emissions of some SI high emitters
563 were comparable to the emissions of most CI vehicles on the Highway Test Cycle. Organic
564 carbon and elemental carbon are the most abundant species in motor vehicle exhaust, accounting
565 for over 95% of the total PM2.5 mass. Elemental carbon is dominant in diesel exhaust and its
566 proportion to total carbon is generally less at lower engine load. Over half the mass of
567 carbonaceous particles emitted by heavy-duty diesel trucks is EC measured by IMPROVE TOR
568 with about two-thirds in the EC2 fraction. PM2.5 emissions from SI high-emitters contain
569 predominantly OC. However, black carbon and PM emission rates for SI vehicles can be two to
19
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
570 eight times larger during the cold start phase than during hot stabilized operation, which confirm
571 previous results from NKFAQS.5'6 Relatively clean SI vehicles can also produce black carbon
572 emissions during the more aggressive portions of the driving cycle. Therefore, the emission
573 profiles for clean SI vehicles from dynamometer tests may contain higher fractions of EC than
574 would be produced in congested urban driving conditions. There are a few moderate to high-
575 emitting SI vehicles with EC/TC ratios that are comparable to heavy-duty diesel trucks with
576 higher fractions of elemental carbon in the EC2 fraction.
577 Total carbon measurements by the IMPROVE-TOR and STN-TOT protocols agree well
578 for diesel exhaust samples. EC emission rates measured by IMPROVE were also in good
579 agreement with STN for CI exhaust. While EC measurements for SI vehicles agreed between the
580 two protocols at higher PM emission rates, the divergence increased with decreasing PM
581 emissions. Using IMPROVE EC rather than STN EC in the Chemical Mass Balance fit for the
582 Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study resulted in about 40 percent higher CI contributions to ambient
583 particulate carbon, but was not statistically significant within two overlapping standard errors.18
584 However, these results were attributed to greater differences between the two carbon analysis
585 protocols for ambient samples.18
586 SI vehicles, whether low or high emitters, have higher emission rates than CI vehicles
587 (per travel distance basis) of the high molecular-weight particulate PAHs, benzo(ghi)perylene,
588 indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, and coronene. Diesel vehicles have higher emissions of 2 to 4-ring semi-
589 volatile PAHs. Hopanes and steranes are present in lubricating oil with similar composition for
590 both gasoline and diesel vehicles and are negligible in gasoline or diesel fuels. CI vehicles
591 emitted greater total amounts on a mass per mile basis, but abundances were comparable to SI
592 exhaust normalized to total carbon emissions within margin of error. Emission rates of hopanes
593 and steranes are the highest for both gasoline and diesel "high emitting" vehicles. Diacids were
594 emitted by CI vehicles, and cannot be considered unique tracers for either vehicle exhaust or
595 secondary organic aerosols.
596 We also confirmed that the high molecular-weight particulate PAHs,
597 benzo(ghi)perylene, ideno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, and coronene, are found in used gasoline motor oil,
598 but not in fresh oil, and are negligible in used diesel engine oil.10 The contributions of
20
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
599 lubrication oils to abundances of these PAHs in the exhaust were large in some cases and were
600 variable with the age and consumption rate of the oil. These factors contributed to the observed
601 variations in their abundances to total carbon or PM2.5 among the SI composition profiles
602 obtained in this study. As in the NFRAQS, we found in this study that the CMB apportionments
603 of SI exhaust were sensitive to the abundance of high-molecular weight PAHs in the profile and
604 to a lesser extent to hopanes and steranes.18 Variations in abundances of these species in SI and
605 CI exhaust profiles and differences in IMPROVE and STN EC measurements were two of the
606 more important sources of uncertainty in the CMB analysis for this study.18
607
608 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
609 This study was funded by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory through the U. S.
610 Department of Energy's Office of FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies. We acknowledge the
611 vehicle emissions tests performed by Bevilacqua Knight Incorporated and West Virginia
612 University. We also acknowledge the following DRI personnel for their assistance: Kelly Fitch
613 for field sampling, Mark McDaniel and Anna Cunningham for the organic speciation analysis,
614 and Steven Kohl, Barbara Hinsvark and Dale Crow for analysis of inorganic species. We are
615 grateful to Ralphs Grocery for providing a test site and test vehicles. We also thank John Watson
616 for his comments on the manuscript and valuable scientific discussions.
617 SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE
618 Table SI displays the make, model, year, mileage and PM2.s emission rate of each SI vehicle as
619 well as the analytical compositing scheme for composition profiles. Table S2 displays similar
620 information for the CI vehicles. Table S3 lists the speciated emission rates for the composite SI
621 and CI exhaust profiles. A discussion of data quality is presented along with analysis of the
622 dilution tunnel samples. Figure SI compares PM25 emission rates determined by EPA/BKI and
623 UWV from their primary dilution tunnel versus the corresponding values obtained by DRI from
624 the secondary dilution tunnel sampler. Figure S2 show correlation plots of gravimetric mass vs.
625 sum of elements by XRF, ions by 1C and AA, and carbon by TOR for SI and CI vehicles. Table
626 S4 displays the mass loadings in the tunnel blanks relative to the composite SI and CI exhaust
21
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
627 samples. Data and project reports from the study are available online at the following web site:
628 http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/nfti/feat split study.html
629
630 REFERENCES
631 1. Janssen, N.A.; Swartz, J.; Zanobetti, A.; Suh, H.H. Air Conditioning and Source-Specific
632 Particles as Modifiers of the Effect of PM(10) on Hospital Admissions for Heart and
633 Lung Disease. Environ. Health Per sped, 2002, 110, 43-49.
634 2. Laden, F.; Neas, L.M.; Dockery, D.W.; Schwartz, J. Association of Fine Particulate
635 Matter from Different Sources with Daily Mortality in Six U.S. Cities. Environ. Health
636 Perspect., 2000, 108, 941-947.
637 3. Schauer J.J.; Rogge W.F.; Mazurek M.A.; Hildemann L.M.; Cass G.R.; Simoneit B.R.T.
638 Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers.
639 Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 3837-3855.
640 4. Sagebiel, J.C.; Zielinska, B.; Walsh, P.A.; Chow, J.C.; Cadle, S.H.; Mulawa, P.; Knapp,
641 K.T.; Zweidinger R.B; Snow, R. PM-10 Exhaust Samples Collected During IM-240
642 Dynamometer Tests of In-Service Vehicles in Nevada. Environ. Sci. TechnoL, 1997,
643 31:75-83.
644 5. Watson, J.; Fujita, E.; Chow, J.C.; Zielinska, B.; Richards, L.; Neff, W.; Dietrich, D.
645 Northern Front Range Air Quality Study. Final report prepared for Colorado State
646 University, Fort Collins, CO, July 1998.
647 6. Fujita, E.; Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Robinson, N.; Richards, L.; Kumar, N. Northern
648 Front Range Air Quality Study. Volume C: Source Apportionment and Simulation
649 Methods and Evaluation. Final report prepared for Colorado State University, Fort
650 Collins, CO, July 1998.
651 7. Zielinska, B.; McDonald, J.; Hayes, T.; Chow, J.C.; Fujita, E.M.; Watson J.G. Northern
652 Front Range Air Quality Study, Volume B: Source Measurements. Final report prepared
653 for Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, and Electric Power Research Institute,
654 Palo Alto, CA, by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, July 1998.
655 8. Schauer, J.J.; Kleeman, M.J.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit B.R.T. Measurement of Emission
656 from Air Pollution Sources. 3. Cl-through C-30 Organic Compounds from Medium Duty
657 Diesel Trucks. Environ Sci Techno!., 1999, 33: 1578-1587.
658 9. Schauer, J.J.; Kleeman, M.J.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit B.R.T. Measurement of Emission
659 from Air Pollution Sources. 5. Cl-through C-30 Organic Compounds from Gasoline-
660 Powered Motor Vehicles. Environ Sci Technol. 2002, 36: 1169-1180.
22
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
661 10. Zielinska, B.; Sagebiel, J.; McDonald, J.D.; Whitney K.; Lawson D.R. Emission Rates
662 and Comparative Chemical Composition from Selected In-Use Diesel and Gasoline-
663 Fueled Vehicles. J. Air & WasteManage. Assoc. 2004, 54:1138-1150.
664 11. Zielinska, B.; Sagebiel, JC.; Arnott, W.P.; Rogers, C.F.; Kelly, K.E.; Wagner, D.A.;
665 Lightly, J.S.; Sarofim, A.F.; Palmer, G. Phase and Size Distribution of Polycyclic
666 Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Diesel and Gasoline Vehicle Emissions. Environ. Sci.
667 Technol. 2004, 38, 2557-2567.
668 12. Lev-On, M.; LeTavec, C.; Uihlein, J.; Kimura, K.; Alleman, T. L.; Lawson, D. R.;
669 Vertin,K;. Thompson, G. J.; Clark, N.; Gautam, M.; Wayne, S.; Okamoto, R.; Rieger, P.;
670 Yee, G.; Zielinska, B.; Sagebiel, J.; Chatterjeee, S.; Hallstrom K. Chemical Speciation of
671 Exhaust Emissions from Trucks and Buses Fueled on Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel and CNG.
672 SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0432.
673 13. Maricq, M.M.; Podsiadlik, D.H.; Chase, R.E. Examination of the Size-Resolved and
674 Transient Nature of Motor Vehicle Particle Emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33,
675 1618-1628.
676 14. Cadle, S.H.; Mulawa, P.; Groblicki, P.; Laroo, C.; Ragazzi, R.; Nelson, K.; Gallagher G.;
677 Zielinska, B. In-Use Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicle Particulate Matter Emissions on Three
678 Driving Cycles. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2001, 35, 26-32.
679 15. Cadle, S.H.; Mulawa, P.; Ball, J.; Donase, C.; Weibel, A.; Sagebiel, J.C.; Knapp, K.T.;
680 and Snow, R. (1997) Particulate emission rates from in-use high-emitting vehicles
681 recruited in Orange County, California. Environ. Sci. Technol., 31:3405-3412.
682 16. Mazzoleni, C.; Moosmuller, H.; Kuhns, H.D.; Keislar, R.E.; Barber, P.W.; Nikolic, D.;
683 Nussbaum, N.J.; Watson, J.G. Correlation Between Automotive CO, HC, NO, and PM
684 Emission Factors from On-road Remote Sensing: Implications for linspection and
685 Maintenance Programs. Transport. Res. 2004, D9, 477-496.
686 17. Fujita, E.M.; Zielinska, B.; Arnott, W.P.; Campbell, D.E.; Rinehart, L.; Sagebiel, J.C.;
687 Chow J.C. Gasoline/Diesel PM Split Study: Source and Ambient Sampling, Chemical
688 Analysis, and Apportionment Phase. Final report submitted to the U.S. Department of
689 Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, January 19, 2006.
690 18. Fujita, E.M.; Campbell D.E.; Arnott W.P.; Chow, J.C; Zielinska B. Evaluations of source
691 apportionment methods for determining contributions of gasoline and diesel exhaust to
692 ambient carbonaceous aerosols. J Air Waste Manage Assoc, in press.
693 19. Gabele, P. Support of the Gasoline/Diesel Particulate Matter Split Study. Final report
694 submitted by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to Department of Energy through
695 Interagency Agreement (IAG) No. DE-AI04-2001AL67138, March 17, 2003.
23
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
696 20. Clark N.N.; Wayne, W.S.;, Nine, R.D.; Buffamonte, T.; Hall, T.; Rapp, B.L.; Ehompson,
697 G.; and Lyons D.W. Emissions from Diesel-Fueled, Heavy-Duty Vehicles in Southern
698 California, 2003 SAE Transaction Journal of Fuels & Lubricants, pp. 1688-1699.
699 21. Chang, M.C.; Yi, S.M.; Hopke, P.K.; England, G.C.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.
700 Measurement of Ultrafme Particle Size Distributions from Coal-, Oil-, and Gas-Fired
701 Stationary Combustion Sources. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 2004, 54(12), 1494-1505.
702 22. Hildemann, L.M.; Cass, G.R.; and Markowski, G.R. A dilution stack sampler for
703 collection of organic aerosol emissions: design, characterization and field tests. Aerosol
704 Sci. Techno!., 1989, 10:193-204.
705 23. Fitz, D.R.; Chow, J.M.; Zielinska, B. Development of a Gas and Particulate Matter
706 Organic Speciation Profile Data Base. Final report prepared for San Joaquin Valleywide
707 Air Pollution Study Agency, 2003.
708 24. Arnott, W. P.; Moosmuller, H.; Rogers, C.F.; Jin, T.; Bruch, R. Photoacoustic
709 Spectrometer for Measuring Light Absorption by Aerosols: Instrument Description.
710 Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33: 2845-2852.
711 25. Arnott, W. P.; Moosmuller, H.; Walker, J.W. Nitrogen dioxide and kerosene-flame soot
712 calibration of photoacoustic instruments for measurement of light absorption by aerosols.
713 Review of Scientific Instruments, 2000, 71(7): 4545-4552.
714 26. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Frazier, C.A. 1999: X-ray fluorescence analysis of ambient air
715 samples. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles, Vol. 1, Landsberger, S. and M.
716 Creatchman, Eds., Gordon and Breach Science, 67-96.
717 27. Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G; Pritchett, L.C.; Pierson, W.R.; Frazier, C.A.; Purcell, R.G:
718 The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance Carbon Analysis System: Description, Evaluation
719 and Applications in U.S. Air quality Studies. Atmos.Environ., 1993, 27A, 1185-1201.
720 28. Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Crow, D.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Merrifield, T. Comparison of
721 IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol, 2001, 34, 23-34.
722 29. Peterson, M.R.; Richards, M.H. Thermal-optical-transmittance analysis for organic,
723 elemental, carbonate, total carbon, and OCX2 in PM2.5 by the EPA/NIOSH method, in
724 Proceedings, Symposium on Air Quality Measurement Methods and Technology-2002,
725 Winegar, E.D., Tropp, R.J., Eds.; Air & Waste Management Association: Pittsburgh, PA,
726 2002, pp. 83-1-83-19.
727 30. Chow J.C.; Watson, J.G; Chen, L.W.A.; Arnott, W.P.; Moosmuller, H.; Fung, K.
728 Equivalence of Elemental Carbon by Thermal/optical Reflectance and Transmittance
729 with Different Ttemperature Protocol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 4414-4422.
24
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
730 31. Chen, L.-W.A.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Moosmuller, H.; Arnott, W.P. Modeling
731 Reflectance and Transmittance of Quartz-Fiber Filter Samples Containing Elemental
732 Carbon Particles: Implications for Thermal/Optical Analysis. J. Aerosol Sci. 2004, 35(6),
733 765-780.
734 32. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Chen, L.-W.A. Summary of Organic and Elemental
735 Carbon/Black Carbon Analysis Methods and Intercomparisons; Aerosol and Air Quality
736 Research 2005, 5(1), 69-102.
737 33. Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Chen, L.W.A.; Paredes-Miranda, G.; Chang, M.C.; Trimble,
738 D.; Fung, K.K.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.Z. Refining Temperature Measures in Thermal/Optical
739 Carbon Analysis. Atmos. Chem. Physics Discussion 2005, 5, 4477-4505.
740 34. Wang, Z.; Fingas, M.; Li, K. Fractionation of a Light Crude Oil and Identification and
741 Quantification of Aliphatic, Aromatic, and Biomarker Compounds by GC-FID and GC-
742 MS, Part I. J. of Chromatograph. Sci., 1994, 32, 361-366.
743 35. Wang, Z.; Fingas, M.; Li, K. Fractionation of a Light Crude Oil and Identification and
744 Quantification of Aliphatic, Aromatic, and Biomarker Compounds by GC-FID and GC-
745 MS. Part II, J. of Chromatograph. Sci., 1994, 32, 367-382.
746 36. Rinehart, L.R.; Fujita, E.M.; Chow, J.C.; Magliano, K.; Zielinska, B. Spatial distribution
747 of PM2.5 associated organic compounds in central California; Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40,
748 290-303.
749 37. El-Zanan, H.S., et al., Measurement of the Aerosol Organic Mass to Organic Carbon
750 Ratio and Chemical Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosol in Support of Atlanta
751 Health Study: Particle and Multiphase Organics. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.,
752 submitted.
753 38. Simoneit, B.R.T. Application of Molecular Marker Analysis to Vehicular Exhaust for
754 Source Reconciliation. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry,
755 1985, 22, 203-233
756 39. Rogge, W.F.; Hildemann, L.M.; Mazurek, M.A.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Sources of
757 Fine Organic Aerosol 2. Noncatalyst and Catalyst-Equipped Automobiles and Heavy-
758 Duty Diesel Trucks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 636-651.
759 40. Fraser, M.P.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Organic
760 Compounds Emitted from Motor Vehicle Traffic in a Los Angeles Roadway Tunnel.
761 Environ. Sci.& Technol., 1998, 32, 2051 -2060.
762 41. Miguel, A.H.; Kirchstetter, T.W.; Harley, R.A.; Hering, S.V. On-Road Emissions of
763 Particulate Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Black Carbon Soot from Gasoline and
764 Diesel Vehicles. Environ.Sci.Technol., 1998, 32, 450-455.
25
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
765 42. Fraser, M.P.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Particle-Phase Organic Compounds Emitted
766 from Motor Vehicle Exhaust and in Urban Atmosphere. Atmos. Environ., 1999, 33, 2715-
767 2724.
768 43. Chebbi, A.; Carlier, P. Carboxylic Acids in the Troposphere, Occurrence, Sources, and
769 Sinks: A Review. Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 4233-4249.
770 44. Grosjean, D., Seinfeld, J.H., 1989. Parameterization of the formation potential of
771 secondary organic aerosols. Atmos. Environ., 23, 1733-1747.
772 45. Kawamura, K.; Gagosian, R.B. Implications of Omega-Oxocarboxylic Acids in the
773 Remote Marine Atmosphere for Photooxidation of Unsaturated Fatty-Acids. Nature,
774 1987, 325, 330-332.
775 46. Kawamura, K.; Kasukabe, H.; Barrie, L.A.. Source and Reaction Pathways of
776 Dicarboxylic Acids, Ketoacids and Dicarbonyls in Arctic Aerosols: One Year of
777 Observations. Atmos. Environ., 1996, 30, 1709-1722.
778 47. Keywood, M.D.; Kroll, J. H.; Varutbangkul, V.; Bahrein!, R.; Flagan, R. C.; Seinfeld,
779 J.H.. Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Cyclohexene Ozonolysis: Effect of OH
780 Scavenger and the Role of Radical Chemistry. Environ. Sci.& Technol. 2004, 38, 3343-
781 3350.
782 48. Keywood, M.D.; Varutbangkul, V.; Bahrein!, R.; Flagan, R.C.; Seinfeld, J.H. Secondary
783 Organic Aerosol Formation from the Ozonolysis of Cycloalkenes and Related
784 Compounds. Environ. Sci. & Technol., 2004, 38, 4157-4164.
26
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
Table 1. Numbers of vehicles and analytical composite samples in light-duty vehicle test
categories.
Category
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Model Year
1996 and newer
1993-95
1996 and newer
1990-92
1993-95
1990-92
1986-89
1981-85
1980 and earlier
Smoker
LD Diesel
Odometer (miles)
low mileage (< 50,000)
low mileage (< 75,000)
high mileage (> 100,000)
lower mileage (< 100,000)
higher mileage (> 125,000)
> 125,000
> 125,000
> 125,000
> 125,000
no model year or odometer criteria
no model year or odometer criteria
Number of
Vehicles
4
4
4
4
8
9
6
6
6
6
2
59
Number of
Composites 1|2
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
6
2
26
1. Media composites for Categories 1 through 4 and laboratory composites for all other categories.
2. Separate composite samples for Phase 1 plus 2 of the UDC from a cold and warm start (52 composites total).
27
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
792
793
794
795
796
797
Table 2. Numbers of vehicles and analytical composite samples in heavy-duty diesel truck test
categories.
Category
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1. Separate coi
Model Year
Pre-1990
1990-93
1994-97
1998 and newer
Pre-1990
1990-93
1994-97
1998 and newer
Pre-1990
1990-93
1994-97
1998 and newer
Bus
Gross Vehicle Weight (Ibs)
8,501 to 14,000
8,501 to 14,000
8,501 to 14,000
8,501 to 14,000
14,001 to 33,000
14,001 to 33,000
14,001 to 33,000
14,001 to 33,000
33,001 to 80,000
33,001 to 80,000
33,001 to 80,000
33,001 to 80,000
Number of
Vehicles
1
1
2
3
1
0
3
3
2
3
7
4
2
32
Number of
Composites 1
1
1
1
0
2
2
1
3
1
2
14
nposite samples for CSHVR and HW cycles (28 composites total).
28
-------
Resubmitted to J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. on October 12, 2006 AW-05-00197 Vers. 2
798 Table 3. Emission rates of OC, EC
799 and composite profile groupings.
800
and sums of organic compounds by analytical composites
IMPROVE
Profile Analytical
Composite ' Composite
Light-Duty Gasoline
SI_LC SIJC1
SI_2C1
SIJ5C2
SIJ7C1
SI_LW SIJW1
SI_2W1
SIJ5W2
SIJ7W1
SI_HC SIJOC2
SIJOC3
SIJC1
SIJ7C2
SIJ7C3
SI_8C1
SIJOC1
SI_HW SIJOW1
SIJOW2
SIJOW3
SIJW1
SIJ7W2
SIJ7W3
SI_8W1
SI_BC SI_4C1
SIJ5C3
SI_8C2
SI_9C2
SI_BW SI_4W1
SIJ5W3
SI_8W2
SI_9W2
Heavv-Dutv Diesel
MOD HW-5
MOD HW-II
MOD HCS-5
MOD HCS-IIb
HDD;HW HW-10
HDD;HW HW-lln
HDD;HCS HCS-10
HDD;HCS HCS-lln
STN
Sum High
PM2.5 OC EC OC EC MWPAH2
(mg/mile) (mg/mile) (mg/mile) EC/TC (mg/mile) (mg/mile) EC/TC (mg/mile)
8.0
4.4
7.5
4.6
3.7
1.9
3.9
2.1
52.8
59.1
13.1
32.2
31.9
12.9
13.3
17.8
40.2
10.1
6.7
15.8
39.3
6.7
6.2
16.1
26.4
17.6
3.4
5.9
10.4
6.4
1630.1
130.6
1827.3
445.7
411.0
208.4
1185.9
343.4
3.9
1.9
6.0
3.1
1.5
1.2
3.5
2.1
46.3
45.3
4.5
24.5
26.5
9.3
12.5
16.1
35.6
13.6
2.4
11.6
34.0
7.0
1.7
7.7
11.9
5.7
0.8
4.3
4.7
2.2
488.7
154.7
602.5
363.0
300.3
54.0
536.6
120.2
1.2
1.0
2.3
2.1
1.0
0.4
0.6
1.3
6.6
14.4
1.2
2.4
2.0
2.5
3.3
1.2
3.1
4.5
1.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.8
8.4
13.9
10.9
0.9
3.2
5.8
3.5
1332.4
100.8
1490.2
247.9
371.3
81.0
929.8
304.8
0.23
0.34
0.28
0.40
0.40
0.23
0.16
0.37
0.13
0.24
0.21
0.09
0.07
0.21
0.21
0.07
0.08
0.25
0.30
0.15
0.04
0.18
0.51
0.52
0.54
0.65
0.52
0.43
0.55
0.62
0.73
0.39
0.71
0.41
0.55
0.60
0.63
0.72
4.0
2.2
5.8
3.2
1.8
1.5
1.6
2.5
40.0
49.5
5.0
23.3
23.6
8.6
13.3
15.3
35.3
12.7
3.1
11.3
30.7
6.2
2.1
7.1
11.2
6.8
1.1
3.4
4.6
2.9
454.6
142.6
575.1
330.2
271.2
61.5
501.0
123.8
0.6
0.3
1.6
0.7
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.7
9.2
4.6
0.2
2.1
1.1
2.0
2.6
0.8
1.7
2.7
0.1
1.9
0.6
0.8
1.2
8.5
13.8
10.1
0.6
3.1
5.6
2.6
1310.9
82.3
1358.1
198.1
316.8
72.3
818.0
274.9
0.14
0.13
0.22
0.18
0.25
0.02
0.01
0.20
0.19
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.19
0.16
0.05
0.05
0.18
0.02
0.14
0.02
0.11
0.37
0.55
0.55
0.60
0.34
0.48
0.55
0.47
0.74
0.37
0.70
0.38
0.54
0.54
0.62
0.69
0.0401
0.0148
0.0064
0.0055
0.0164
0.0110
0.0017
0.0016
0.0681
0.0609
0.0133
0.0095
0.0034
0.0106
0.0422
0.0047
0.0138
0.0181
0.0046
0.0107
0.0008
0.0030
0.0132
0.0357
0.0364
0.0386
0.0058
0.0048
0.0166
0.0728
0.0000
0.0000
0.0025
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0000
0.0007
Sum of
Hopanes
(mg/mile)
0.0013
0.0004
0.0011
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0018
0.0000
0.0935
0.0401
0.0000
0.1369
0.0270
0.0202
0.0933
0.0953
0.0504
0.0038
0.0000
0.0800
0.0350
0.0311
0.0001
0.0130
0.0482
0.0000
0.0001
0.0021
0.0197
0.0260
0.1243
0.0000
0.2761
0.0000
0.1055
0.0063
0.3833
0.0149
Sum of
Steranes
(mg/mile)
0.0018
0.0029
0.0077
0.0067
0.0021
0.0014
0.0089
0.0161
0.0553
0.0874
0.0023
0.0422
0.0327
0.0112
0.0230
0.0429
0.0310
0.0099
0.0029
0.0167
0.0355
0.0387
0.0011
0.0068
0.0102
0.0071
0.0011
0.0069
0.0073
0.0044
0.2186
0.0000
0.2940
0.2583
0.2714
0.0148
0.2239
0.0322
1. Abbreviation for SI composites - H = High, L = Low, B = high black carbon; for CI composites - 1 = LHDT & MHDT, 2 = HHDT.
3Q \ 2. Sum of potential marker compounds for SI vehicle exhaust, benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene and coronene.
29
-------
Table 4. Contributions of heavy molecular weight PAHs from the lubrication oil to the vehicle exhaust.
Lube Oil (ug/g)
Analytical
Composite
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
SI
OJ
o SI
SI
si.
si.
SI
_1C1
_2C1
_4C1
_5C1
_6C2
_6C3
_7C1
_7C2
_7C3
_8C1
_8C2
_9C2
_10C1
_10C2
10C3
Sum
Hopanes
391.9
171.8
551.2
1377.4
169.2
474.5
224.9
224.9
317.8
381.0
100.4
2769.8
2192.9
779.9
111.3
Emissions
Emission (ug/mile) (g/mile) % PAH from
Sum
Steranes Sum 8 PAH Sum 3 PAH
519.2
296.2
767.5
1247.2
182.7
367.0
367.2
629.3
340.5
545.9
189.2
2496.1
1791.3
729.9
244.3
26.1
85.3
134.1
94.1
49.8
140.1
65.7
136.2
50.1
49.0
31.3
76.4
71.5
155.7
29.2
9.6
19.1
22.6
26.1
12.2
22.8
21.4
13.2
20.1
16.2
4.2
10.9
16.7
23.5
8.8
Sum 8
PAH
50.4
17.6
18.5
15.6
10.2
61.5
8.2
23.4
6.1
23.6
71
51.8
48.7
96.1
92.3
Sum 3
PAH
41.2
15.3
13.6
13.8
6.5
36.7
5.8
9.8
3.5
10.9
37.5
39.7
43.4
70.1
62.6
Lub Oil
Oil Sum 8 PAH Sum 3 PAH
0.003
0.010
0.001
0.002
0.042
0.019
0.018
0.067
0.096
0.021
0.054
0.003
0.013
0.076
0.358
0.2%
4.7%
1.0%
1.1%
20.6%
4.2%
14.6%
39.0%
78.8%
4.3%
2.4%
0.4%
1.9%
12.3%
11.3%
0.1%
1.2%
0.2%
0.3%
7.9%
1.2%
6.7%
9.0%
55.0%
3.1%
0.6%
0.1%
0.5%
2.5%
5.1%
OC/TC
%
77.1%
66.3%
49.0%
78.6%
72.5%
47.9%
60.3%
91.1%
92.9%
78.9%
46.1%
34.5%
79.0%
87.5%
75.8%
-------
Figure Captions
Figure 1. Emission rates (mg/mile) of zinc, calcium and phosphorus for (a) light-duty SI vehicles
and (b) heavy-duty CI vehicles.
Figure 2. Distributions of emission rates by carbon fractions measured by TOR-IMPROVE
method.
Figure 3. Ratios of elemental carbon measured by STN to IMPROVE as a function of EC
concentrations and scatterplots of STN versus IMPROVE EC measurements for SI and CI
exhaust samples.
Figure 4. Scatterplots of STN versus IMPROVE EC measurements for all CI and SI exhaust
samples (upper panel) and for lower sample loadings (lower panel).
Figure 5. Variations in black carbon emissions during the UDC test cycle for very clean, normal
and visibly smoking SI vehicle, and a light-duty diesel vehicle.
Figure 6. Emission rates of parti culate poly cyclic aromatic compounds. Species mnemonics are
explained in Table S3.
Figure 7. Concentrations of parti culate poly cyclic aromatic compounds in diesel fuels and CI
and SI vehicle lubrication oils.
Figure 8. Emission rates of hopanes and steranes. This result is inconsistent with previous studies
that have shown similar composition of hopanes and steranes in SI and CI exhaust. Some CI
samples were not included in the composite profile due to higher uncertainty caused by higher
dilution ratios used in sample collection or invalid analytical results for other species.
Figure 9. Concentrations of steranes (upper panel) and hopanes (lower panel) in CI and SI
vehicle lubrication oils.
31
-------
12
9 -
O)
3 -
...
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
o o
o o
o o
o o
o
CD
lO
oo
CO^
lOrvi
to
D phxc D caxc S znxc
to
UU70
80% -
60% -
40% -
20% -
^
-^
I
&
v:v
1
—
.^
s
—
&
•TV:
-ai-
—
?S
v!v
£
—
^
^
i
£/
:v
1
-
v:v
—
^?
_ ~-v
—
'&
|
I
^
g
I
—
-
m
1
—
S5
^
—
^
^
i-
—
sf
^
—
S5
':v:
—
-
-
$S
_-~y
*
s$
1
—
%£
^
/^^
—
^
-^
i
—
?s
v_v
i£
—
^
i
—
•&
-2£
^
^
^
%}
s_--J
1
—
:v
-
-
?s
v:v
^
—
^
&
^
M
£s
^
^:^
u^^
^5
':v
^
^
^?
^
—
^
^
—
^
':v:
/^^
y^'
-^~^
-
:v:
-
i
^o.
—
v^y
^
w ^
^
IV:
1
^
I
5^
'""
i
-
s*
|
I
-
oooooooooo
o
o
o o
o o
T- T- CM
o o o o o
o o o
m o t-
CM CO CO
o o
83 8
oooo
O O
§ 8
o o o
Figure la
-------
12
9
6
(((
000
((
0
00000
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
((((
0000000
"88888888888888
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
11111
IIIIIIIIIIII
100%
80%
60% H
40%
20%
0%
CO^ir)T-CNJT-T-T-CNJT-CNj^
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Figure Ib
-------
Cl Vehicles
SI Vehicles
1400
30
25
20
15
10
o
~"i
w
o
X
w
0
DQ
I
W
w
w
DQ
1
W
• EC3
0EC2
• EC1-op
D OC4-op
DOC2
S
Figure 2
-------
14000
TC (ug/m3)
CO CO
source samples
12000 -
9000
6000
3000 -
n <
X
0 %
X
OxX
x y = 0.99x
jg ° R2 = 0.99
x"
5000 10000
IMPROVE
15000
_ _ a _ _ a _ J
EC (ug/m3)
CO CO
source samples
IZUUU
9000
z
OT 6000
3000
n <
*>
X
s
X
X
O xX
xxX y = 1.07x
o ^" R2 = 0-98
-------
Heavy-Duty Diesel
zuuu -
2000 -
f 1500-
3
Z
OT 1000 -
0
m
500 -
n i
O
x
O .x
,x' O
,s*
x.-6'0
X
x6 y = 0.97x
.x'' R2 = 0.99
y
500
400 -
300 -
OT 200 -
a
100 -
.'*
.
xO
100 200 300 400
ECJMPROVE (ug/m3)
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
EC_IMPROVE (ug/m3)
Heavy-Duty Diesel
500
2500
2000 -
1500-
1 1000 -
500 -
250
200 -
150 -
50 -
Figure 4
Light-Duty Gasoline
0-
r
o
y = 0.96x
R2 = 0.88
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
ECJMPROVE (ug/m3)
Light-Duty Gasoline
.a
50 100 150 200 250
ECJMPROVE (ug/m3)
36
-------
100000
10000
1000
too
10
— - 'Common' Gasoline Vehicle, Run 6-27, Toyota Corolla Wagon
• i Smoker, gasoline vehicle, Run 10-53, Mazda B2200
— Diesel Automobile, Run 11-59, Mercedes 300D Turbo
"VERY CLEAN" CAMRY 3NCE667
V K v 'i :-
l\ v J\ W *'
l\ n.Li ,v v,
00:00 00:05 00:10 00:15 00:20 00:25 00:30 00:35 00:40 00:45 00:50 00:55
Elapsed Time (HH:MM)
Figure 5.
-------
Cl Vehicles
SI Vehicles
oo
0£n
.ou
£n AD
TO
,§
(A
0)
J3 n on
*3 0.30
a:
c
0
M OPO
£
LU
01 n
ODD
SRS
ESS
oo^
W
I
Q
Q
I
1
%,
%
%
f//j
%
'%,
O
^
n I
§ Q
I Q
0.04
0.03
E
^i
E
I 0.02
c
o
'55
w
0.01
0.00
m corone
sbghipe
n incdpy
ffl bapyrn
• bepyrn
H bbjkfl
n chrysn
a baanth
Figure 6
-------
160
VO
120
•5*
G>
C
O
0)
O
C
O
O
80
40
n corone
n bghipe
n incdpy
a bapyrn
• bepyrn
n bbjkfl
• chrysn
n baanth
-------
Cl Vehicles
SI Vehicles
0.40
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0 ster53
m ster52
oster51
D sterSO
& ster49
• ster48
D ster47
• ster45_40
n ster44
H ster43
• ster42
S ster39
• ster36
& ster35
Cl Vehicles
SI Vehicles
0.40
0.06 -,
n n^ -
n 04
n n^
n n9
n m
o
~"i
CO
^
^
•
«
sH
00
ss
ffj
o
I
w
o
m
w
1,
w
rmT
IB
jut
H
_•_•_
|
1
w
1,
w
S hop26
n hop25
• hop24
D hop22
Bhop21
• hop19
fflhopl?
Dhnnl ^
0hop13
Figure 8
40
-------
Cl Vehicles
SI Vehicles-Cold Start
50
40 --
30 --
20 --[
10 --
^cp^^c?H^tr^^t?*t^Cr^^i
-- 40
^F
I
--30 1
50
™_-- 20
-- 10
-4- o
CNCO'^'LOI^COCnOT-CNCO
CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)CL)
]CI HDD oil [
]CI MOD oil
CI_HDD ---a-- CI_MDD
150
120 --
o
o
LO LO LO LO
CUCUCUCUCUCUCUCUCL)
1/5 "55 "55 "55 wwwwwwwww
]SI Loil [
]SI_Hoil ---A--- SI_LC.
-SI HC
150
120 -
o
I
90 -
150
- 120
- 90
- 60
- 30
300
250 --
Figure 9
-------
Supporting Information
42
-------
Table SI. PM emission rates of light-duty vehicles and analytical compositing scheme for
composition profiles.
UPC P1+P2 Cold Start
Vehicle Model
ID Year
1-1 1995
1-2 1996
1-3 1995
1-4 1997
2-5 1995
2-6 1995
2-7 1995
2-8 1995
3-9 1999
3-10 1996
3-11 1995
3-12 1995
4-13 1991
4-14 1992
4-15 1992
4-16 1991
5-17 1995
5-18 1993
5-19 1984
5-20 1992
5-21 1993
5-22 1994
5-23 1995
5-24 1994
6-25 1992
6-26 1991
6-27 1990
6-28 1992
6-29 1992
6-30 1991
6-31 1991
6-32 1992
6-33 1995
7-34 1988
7-35 1987
7-36 1986
7-37 1989
7-38A 1987
7-39 1989
8-40 1985
8-41 1984
8-42 1982
8-43 1981
8-44 1984
8-45 1983
8-46 1979
8-47 1980
9-48 1977
9-49 1980
9-50 1979
10-52A 1969
10-53 1988
10-54 1989
10-55 1978
10-56 1989
10-57 1990
11-58 1982
11-59 1983
* Same sampling medii
Odometer
Make & Model
Toyota Camry
Dodge Dakota Sport
GMC Yukon
Jeep Cherokee Laredo
Ford Explorer
Toyota Camry
Ford Contour
Pontiac Trans Sport
Ford Ranger XLT
Geo Prizm
Toyota Camry
Nissan Maxima
Jeep Cherokee Laredo
BMW 3 Series
Toyota Previa
Mazda MX-6
Ford Windstar
Geo Prizm
VW Vanagon
Ford Explorer
Chevrolet Astro
Nissan Sentra
Dodge Caravan
Toyota Camry
Infiniti G20
Toyota Corolla
Toyota Corolla
Honda Accord
Dodge Caravan
Pontiac Trans Sport
BuickLeSabre
Honda Accord
Ford Explorer
Ford Ranger
Mazda Rx7
Chevrolet S-10
Plymouth Reliant
Olds Cutlass
Acura Legend
Toyota Tacoma
Toyota Corolla
Chevrolet Silverado 20
Chrysler Imperial
Toyota Pickup
Toyota Celica
Mercedes 450 SI
Honda Accord
Chevrolet Luv
Toyota Celica
Toyota Corolla
Chevrolet Chevelle Malibu
Mazda B2200 PU
Mitsubishi Mighty Max
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
Toyota Tacoma
Vw Jetta
Chevrolet 1500 High Sierra
Mercedes 300D
a used for test within vehicle category ('
(miles)
47502
23283
59493
45359
32610
45091
33958
83413
121093
125462
95350
97329
83210
52773
134133
70189
84744
145260
154225
128,987
140075
137702
103586
216776
137675
160012
149636
124080
160601
120102
140958
172246
120854
92387
162367
418371
147518
118459
174142
212037
248202
148210
151948
167579
197122
159085
182190
158928
98349
121813
147674
149811
273290
128913
421092
259488
162308
361112
'media composites").
Analytical
Composite
SI_1C1*
SIJ2C1*
SI 2C1
SI_3C1* (a)
SI_4C1*
SI 5C1
SI 5C2
SI 5C1
SI_5C2
SI 5C2
SI_5C2
SI 5C2(a)
SI 5C2(a)
SIJ5C1
SI 6C2
SI 6C2
SIJ5C1
SI 6C3
SI 6C1
SIJ5C1 (a)
SI 6C1 (a)
SI 6C1 (a)
SIJTC1
SI 7C2
SI 7C1
SIJTC1
SI 7C1
SI 7C3
SIJ8C2
SI_8C1
SI 8C3
SI 8C1
SIJ9C1
SI 9C1 (a)
SI 9C2
SIJ9C4
SI 9C3
SI 10C5(b)
SIJOC4 (b)
SI 10C3
SI_10C1
SI_10C2
CI 11C1
PMj,(mg/mile)
8.0
6.3
2.3
1.6
6.2
2.7
3.2
23.1
3.5
6.3
2.2
1.0
0.9
2.4
3.5
11.4
3.3
16.1
5.8
1.6
1.4
1.7
5.2
32.2
3.6
2.3
7.2
31.9
26.4
18.9
139.7
7.0
5.3
1.7
17.6
94.0
37.7
219.2
251.9
59.1
13.3
52.8
305.2
UPC P1+P2 Warm Start
Analytical
Composite
SI_1W1*
SIJ2W1*
SI 2W1
SI_3W1* (a)
SI_4W1*
SI 5W1
SI 5W2(a)
SI 5W1
SI_5W2 (a)
SI 5W2(a)
SI_5W2 (a)
SI 5W2(a)
SI 5W2(a)
SI_6W1 (a)
SI 6W2
SI 6W2
SI_6W1 (a)
SI 6W3
SI 6W1 (a)
SI_6W1 (a)
SI 6W1 (a)
SI 6W1 (a)
SIJTWl
SI 7W2
SI 7W1
SIJ7W1
SI 7W1
SI 7W3
SIJ8W2
SIJ8W1
SI 8W3
SI 8W1
SIJ9W1
SI 9W1 (a)
SI 9W2
SI_9W4
SI 9W3
SI 10W5
SIJOW4 (b)
SI 10W3
SIJlOWl
SI_10W2
CI_11W1
PMj, (mg/mile)
3.7
3.5
0.4
0.7
3.4
2.1
1.3
11.0
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.0
0.2
0.3
2.1
5.8
0.6
5.9
2.1
0.3
0.0
0.8
2.1
15.8
1.8
2.5
1.8
39.3
10.4
10.3
13.7
3.1
4.2
0.8
6.4
111.4
35.8
127.2
207.9
10.1
17.8
40.2
295.2
(a) Sample loading too low for valid organic speciation.
(b) Sample loading too high for reliable carbon analysis
43
-------
Table S2. PM emission rates of heavy-duty diesel vehicles and analytical compositing scheme
for composition profiles.
Vehicle
ID
1.1
2.1
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
5.1
5.2
7.1
7.2
7.3
8.1
8.2
8.3
9.1
9.2
10.1
10.2
10.3
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.6
11.7
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
13.1
13.2
Model
Year
1989
1990
1997
1997
2000
2000
2000
1988
1988
1995
1995
1996
1999
1999
1999
1985
1985
1992
1993
1992
1994
1994
1997
1997
1996
1994
1995
1999
2000
2001
1998
1992
1982
Manufacturer
Ford
Ford
Isuzu
GMC
Isuzu
Ford
Isuzu
Ford
International
GM
International
Freightliner
Isuzu
International
Freightliner
International
Freightliner
Ford
Freightliner
Volvo
Freightliner
Freightliner
Ford
Volvo
Volvo
Freightliner
Freightliner
Sterling
Sterling
Volvo
Sterling
TMC
GMC
Type
Box Truck
Tractor Truck
Box Truck
Box Truck
Box Truck
Van
Box Truck
Box Truck
Box Truck
Box Truck
Flat Bed
Box Truck
Box Truck
Box Truck
Box Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Tractor Truck
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
GVW
(Ibs)
11000
11000
12000
10000
12000
9500
14000
26500
18000
25950
25500
26000
19500
25500
26000
32000
80000
48000
52000
46000
52000
80000
46000
50000
50350
52000
50000
52000
52000
52000
52000
39500
36900
Odometer
(miles)
55973
114493
86944
45164
27965
361
170556
169008
92000
151601
162300
15840
56835
49251
501586
36252
769413
842140
109897
109897
602338
449600
437500
472927
241843
272307
255880
145749
327300
519395
103143
Hot GSR PM (mg/mi)
Analytical PM2.5
Composite (mg/mile)
HCS-Ia (a)
HCS-Ia (a)
HCS-Ib (a)
HCS-Ib (a)
HCS-Ib (a)
HCS-Ib (a)
HCS-Ib (a)
HCS-5
HCS-II (a)
HCS-IIb
HCS-II
HCS-II
HCS-II
HCS-II
HCS-9n
HCS-9e
HCS-10
HCS-10
HCS-10
HCS-11
HCS-11
HCS-11
HCS-11
HCS-11
HCS-lln
HCS-11 e
HCS-12
HCS-12
HCS-12
HCS-12
HCS-13.1 (a)
HCS-13.2(a)
358
122
159
231
153
176
148
99
445
70
153
340
862
680
539
392
505
1041
1125
343
493
523
412
313
417
865
Highway PM (mg/mi
Analytical PM2.5
Composite (mg/mile)
HW-Ia (a)
HW-Ia (a)
HW-Ib (a)
HW-Ib (a)
HW-Ib (a)
HW-Ib (a)
HW-Ib (a)
HW-5
HW-II
HW-Iib (a)
HW-II
HW-II
HW-II
HW-II
HW-9n
HW-9e
HW-10
HW-10
HW-10
HW-11
HW-11
HW-11
HW-11
HW-11
HW-lln
HW-lle(a)
HW-12
HW-12
HW-12
HW-12
106
66
65
74
87
86
90
205
155
67
59
207
119
440
414
369
206
239
166
420
520
208
8
225
143
185
128
(a) Sample loading too low for valid organic speciation.
44
-------
Table S3. Speciated Emission Rates for Composite Diesel and Gasoline Exhaust Profiles.
Species Description
Nmemonic
PM mass and IMPROVE carbon (ma/milel
PM2.5 Mass MSGC
Total Carbon (TC) TC
Organic Carbon (OC) OCTC
Elemental Carbon (EC) ECTC
OC Fraction 1 O1TC
OC Fraction 2 O2TC
OC Fraction 3 O3TC
OC Fraction 4 + Pyrolyzed O( O4_OP
EC Fraction 1 - Pyrolyzed OC E1_OP
EC Fraction 2 E2TC
EC Fraction 3 E3TC
STN carbpm (ma/milel
NIOSH OC OC_STN
NIOSH EC EC_STN
Elements (mg/mile)
Chloride CLIC
Nitrate N3IC
Sulfate S4IC
Ammonium N4CC
Soluble Potassium KPAC
Sodium (gualitative only) NAXC
Magnesium (gualitative only) MGXC
Aluminum ALXC
Silicon SIXC
Phosphorous PHXC
Sulfur SUXC
Chlorine CLXC
Potassium KPXC
Calcium CAXC
Chromium CRXC
Manganese MNXC
Iron FEXC
Nickel NIXC
Copper CUXC
Zinc ZNXC
Bromine BRXC
Rubidium RBXC
Strontium SRXC
Molybdenum MOXC
Barium BAXC
Lead PBXC
HDD
667.8 ±11. 8
871 .8 ±17.9
335.6 ±14.1
536.1 ±11.0
127.1 ±9.9
62.6 ±4.6
101.9 ±8.6
44.0 ±2.1
172.0 ±27.5
363.0 ±13.5
1.1 ±0.3
312.7±11.9
469.0 ±13.7
2 1 1 + 0 53
0 12 + 049
11. 33 ±0.54
3.01 +0.50
1 04 + 0 06
0.97 + 0.46
0.49 + 0.27
099 + 0 12
8.24 ±0.13
1.05 + 0.03
5.11 +0.08
0 49 + 0 09
070 + 007
4.41 +0.08
0.03 + 0.06
001+003
5 73 + 0 10
0.01 +0.02
0.15 + 0.01
2 90 + 0 04
0 02 + 0 02
0.00 + 0.02
0.02 + 0.02
0 03 + 0 05
1 56 + 1 14
0.10 + 0.06
HCS
975.3 ± 22.2
1206.1 ±32.3
432.5 ±24.7
773.5 ± 20.9
169.3 ±17.6
81.5±8.1
127.1 ± 14.9
54.7 ±3.7
235.0 ± 50.3
538.1 ± 25.4
0.3 ±0.4
406.7 ±21. 5
682.2 ± 25.8
3 74 + 0 98
0 00 + 0 90
14.90 ±0.97
3.75 + 0.91
1 51 +0 12
0.68 + 0.88
0.83 + 0.50
1 57 + 0 19
1222 + 025
1.45 + 0.06
6.94 + 0.15
088 + 0 15
1 15 + 0 11
6.33 + 0.14
0.04 + 0.12
0 01 + 0 06
9 88 + 0 20
0.02 + 0.03
0.24 + 0.01
4 43 + 0 09
0 03 + 0 03
0.00 + 0.03
0.03 + 0.03
0 04 + 0 09
2 84 + 2 07
0.17 + 0.11
HW
360.4 ±8.2
537.4 ± 15.3
238.7 ±13.5
298.7 ±7.2
85.0 ±9.2
43.7 ±4.3
76.8 ± 8.6
33.3 ±2.0
108.9 ±22.4
187.9 ±9.3
1.9 ±0.3
218.7 ±10.0
255.7 ±9.3
0 48 + 0 40
0 25 + 0 39
7.77 ±0.46
2.27 + 0.41
0 56 + 0 05
1.26 + 0.23
0.14 + 0.20
0 41 +0 13
4 26 + 0 09
0.66 + 0.03
3.28 + 0.07
0 11 +0 10
0 25 + 0 08
2.49 + 0.06
0.01 +0.03
0 01 + 0 02
1 59 + 0 03
0.00 + 0.01
0.06 + 0.01
1 37 + 0 02
0 00 + 0 02
0.00 + 0.01
0.01 +0.02
0 01 + 0 04
0 29 + 0 93
0.03 + 0.05
MDD
569.5 ± 17.3
725.3 ± 26.8
278.5 ±19.1
446.8 ± 18.9
92.2 ± 13.6
60.3 ±6.7
82.6 ±11. 3
43.4 ±2.7
120.5 ±32.6
325.1 ±26.6
1.2 ±0.3
259.1 ± 12.7
409.8 ± 20.1
1 16 + 053
3 41 + 0 62
16.44 + 0.62
6.05 + 0.56
061+007
1.54 + 0.39
0.66 + 0.27
1 20 + 0 09
636 + 0 19
0.51 +0.09
7.12 + 0.13
051 +0 10
0 70 + 0 07
2.98 + 0.09
0.00 + 0.06
0 00 + 0 04
357 + 0 10
0.00 + 0.02
0.04 + 0.02
1 10 + 003
0 24 + 0 02
0.00 + 0.02
0.02 + 0.02
0 00 + 0 06
0 87 + 1 36
0.01 +0.07
SI BC
12.1 ±0.3
10.4 ±0.5
4.6 ±0.5
5.8 ±0.2
2.0 ±0.4
1.0±0.1
0.8 ±0.1
0.8 ±0.3
1.8 ±0.4
4.0 ±0.4
0.0 ±0.0
4.8 ±0.2
5.3 ±0.2
0 04 + 0 00
0 11 +001
0.59 + 0.02
0.25 + 0.01
0 00 + 0 00
0.01 +0.01
0.02 + 0.00
001+000
041+001
0.03 + 0.00
0.24 + 0.01
0 03 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.04 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 02 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 05 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
001+001
0.00 + 0.00
SI BW
5.2 ±0.1
4.4 ±0.2
2.1 ±0.2
2.3 ±0.1
0.5 ±0.1
0.5 ±0.1
0.6 ±0.1
0.4 ±0.0
1.1 ±0.1
1.2 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.0
2.2 ±0.1
2.0 ±0.1
0 02 + 0 00
0 08 + 0 01
0.20 + 0.01
0.10 + 0.01
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.01
0.01 +0.00
0 00 + 0 00
031+001
0.04 + 0.00
0.08 + 0.00
0 01 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.10 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 02 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 04 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
001+001
0.00 + 0.00
SI HC
26.8 ±0.5
24.3 ±2.1
20.3 ±2.0
4.0 ±0.1
12.7 ±2.0
3.8 ±0.4
2.1 ±0.2
1.7 ±0.2
2.4 ±0.3
1.5 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
19.7 ±0.5
2.6 ±0.2
007 + 001
0 08 + 0 01
0.54 + 0.02
0.20 + 0.01
0 01 + 0 00
0.01 + 0.01
0.04 + 0.00
0 01 + 0 00
0 56 + 0 01
0.08 + 0.00
0.23 + 0.01
0 03 + 0 00
0 01 + 0 00
0.15 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 06 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.02 + 0.00
0 10 + 000
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 01 + 0 02
0.01 + 0.00
SI HW
16.6 ±0.4
16.3 ± 1.5
14.4 ± 1.5
1.9 ±0.0
9.2 ±1.4
2.4 ±0.3
1.8 ±0.2
1.1 ±0.2
0.7 ±0.3
1.1 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
13.8 ±0.4
1.0 ±0.2
007 + 001
0 08 + 0 01
0.18 + 0.01
0.07 + 0.01
0 01 + 0 00
0.01 +0.01
0.04 + 0.00
0 01 + 0 00
0 42 + 0 01
0.05 + 0.00
0.10 + 0.00
0 01 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.13 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 03 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.02 + 0.00
0 07 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 03 + 0 02
0.01 +0.00
SI LC
5.9 ±0.1
4.9 ±0.1
3.4 ±0.1
1.5 ±0.0
1.0 ±0.1
1.0±0.1
0.9 ±0.1
0.5 ±0.0
0.9 ±0.0
0.6 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
3.5 ±0.1
0.7 ±0.0
0 04 + 0 00
0 10 + 000
0.54 + 0.01
0.25 + 0.01
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.01 + 0.00
0 01 + 0 00
021 +000
0.02 + 0.00
0.21 + 0.00
0 03 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.04 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 03 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 02 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 01 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
SI LW
2.8 ±0.0
2. 7 ±0.1
1.9±0.1
0.8 ±0.0
0.6 ±0.1
0.4 ±0.0
0.6 ±0.0
0.3 ±0.0
0.4 ±0.0
0.4 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
1.9 ±0.0
0.4 ±0.0
0 02 + 0 00
0 08 + 0 00
0.26 + 0.01
0.12 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0.01 +0.00
0.01 +0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 1 1 + 0 00
0.01 +0.00
0.10 + 0.00
0 01 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.02 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 02 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 01 + 0 00
0 00 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
0.00 + 0.00
0 00 + 0 00
0 01 + 0 00
0.00 + 0.00
-------
Table S3 (continued). Speciated emission rates for composite diesel and gasoline exhaust profiles.
Species Description
Nmemonic
HDD
HCS
HW
MDD
SI BC
SI BW
SI HC
SI HW
SI LC
SI LW
Polvcvclic aromatic hydrocarbons fug/milel
Naphthalene
Sum of methyl napthalenes
Biphenyl
\ +2ethylnaphthalene
Sum of dimethyl napthalenes
Sum of methylbiphenyls
Bibenzyl
Dibenzofuran
NAPHTH
MNAPH
BIPHEN
ENAP12
DMNAPH
MBPH
BIBENZ
DBZFUR
Sum oftrimethyl naphthalene TMNAPH
Sum of ethyl methyl napthalei EMNAPH
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Sum of methyl flourenes
9-fluorenone
Xanthone
Acenaphthenequinone
Perinaphthenone
Sum of methyl phenanthrene!
ACNAPY
ACNAPE
FLUORE
PHENAN
MFLUOR
FL9ONE
XANONE
ACQUONE
PNAPONE
MPHEN
Sum of di-methyl phenanthreiDMPHEN
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Retene
Sum of methylpyrenes
Benzo(c)phenanthrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b+j+k)fluoranthene
BeP
BaP
lndeno[123-cd]pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene
Coronene
Alkanes fug/milel
Norfarnesane
Farnesane
Norpristane
Pristane
Phytane
Sum of cyclohexanes
Polar Compounds (ug/mile)
tridecanoic acid (c13)
phthalic acid
glutaric acid (d-c5)
succinicacid (d-c4)
ANTHRA
FLUORA
PYRENE
RETENE
MFLPYR
BZCPHEN
BAANTH
CHRYSN
BBJKFL
BEPYRN
BAPYRN
INCDPY
BGHIPE
DBANTH
CORONE
NORFARN
FARNES
NORPRIS
PRIST
PHYTAN
NCYHEXS
TDECAC
PHTHAC
GLUAC
SUCAC
2 1226 ±678
2137 ±41
273 ±10
734 ± 25
1912 ±86
18743 ±446
0.0 ± 524.2
141.5 ±4.9
975.1 ±18.3
580.5 ± 25.0
320 6 + 23 2
95.3 ±31. 2
440.4 ±16.6
706.2 ±21.1
198.8 ±16.6
42376 ± 1353
3125 ±77
440 ± 20
1179 ±49
2569 ±149
35897 ± 878
0.0 ± 643.9
207.2 ± 9.2
1414.2 ±33.5
901.1 ±44.3
484 5 + 43 5
190.5 ±61 .4
532.5 ± 27.2
1054.3 ±40.0
273.7 ±30.4
2790.3 ±85.74002.3 ±159.3
35.0 ±3.5
29.9 ±3.2
532 .9 ±31. 5
291 .5 ±17.3
142.2 ± 10.0
36.0 ±8.1
1253.4 ±46.1
1404.2 ±49.5
3.1 ±5.2
264.1 ±38.4
0.2 ±4.3
151.6±11.2
132.1 ±13.4
28.2 ±6.1
2.0 ±2.7
4.8 ±8.5
0.1 ±7.1
0.0 ±9.2
0.0 ± 10.2
0.0 ±2.6
118.2 ±10.2
33.2 ±14.1
491 .9 ±35.2
179.1 ±18.0
306.3 ± 47.4
57.2 ± 6.5
59.7 ±6.1
762.7 ± 58.8
448.4 ± 30.7
244.3 ±18.6
60.2 ± 14.7
1826.0 ±86.2
2083.3 ± 93.1
6.1 ±9.7
429.0 ±65.7
0.2 ±7.8
302.7 ±21. 3
207.9 ±25.0
56.3 ±11. 8
2.2 ±4.9
7.2 ± 15.6
0.2 ±13.1
0.0 ± 17.0
0.0 ±18.9
0.0 ±4.9
141.8 ±16.4
34.2 ± 23.6
548.2 ± 54.9
358.2 ± 36.0
406.8 ± 85.4
77 ±73
1148 ±28
106 ±6
288 ±14
1255 ±88
1588 ±158
0.0 ±827.3
75.8 ±3.6
536.1 ± 14.9
259.9 ±23.4
1566 + 162
0.1 ± 11.4
348.3 ±18.9
358.1 ±13.7
123.8 ±13.6
1578.4 ±63.2
12.8 ±2.6
0.0 ±2.0
303.1 ±22.6
134.7 ±16.1
40.1 ± 7.2
11.7±6.6
680.9 ±32 .5
725.2 ± 33.4
0.0 ±3.6
99.1 ±39.6
0.3 ±3.6
0.4 ± 7.0
56.3 ±9.9
0.1 ±3.2
1.8 ±2.2
2.4 ±6.7
0.0 ±5.4
0.0 ±7.0
0.0 ±7.8
0.0 ±2.0
94.6 ±12.3
32.1 ±15.5
435.6 ±44.1
0.0 ±2.0
205.7 ±41 .3
8432 ±215
1232 ±38
58 ±7
654 ± 28
1177 ±104
821 ±321
0.0 ± 746.6
91.0 ±5.2
762.4 ±21.0
393.0 ± 22.7
232 4 + 30 5
136.1 ±20.6
238.9 ± 12.2
283.1 ± 10.3
253.7 ±15.8
961.0 ±38.3
13.6 ±4.5
0.0 ±4.2
223.6 ±18.7
91.4 ±10.7
93.5 ±11. 6
25.5 ±5.2
326.0 ±17.5
516.8 ±25.6
0.0 ±6.0
185.2 ±38.5
0.0 ±6.3
140.0 ± 14.0
78.9 ± 11.4
0.0 ±6.8
0.0 ±4.2
2.4 ± 13.6
0.0 ±11. 4
0.3 ± 14.8
0.0 ±16.5
0.0 ±4.2
362.1 ±29.5
640.1 ± 74.0
841 .8 ±75.3
30.4 ±7.1
703.9 ± 64.9
3808.7 ± 235.74458.7 ± 212.23158.7 ± 421 .C2538.7 ± 331 .3
8.1 ± 14.6
12.0 ±27.7
1357.3 ±175.82658.5 ±350.1
170.9 ±43.7
192.4 ±73.7
339.2 ± 87.0
372.6 ±146.3
4.1 ±9.0
56.1 ±33.2
2.6 ±7.5
12.2 ±18.0
0.0 ±7.3
381.1 ±94.8
27.4 ±17.2
270.6 ± 65.0
3000 ± 72
1560 ±32
56 ±1
79 ±2
309 ± 24
22 ± 15
105.1 ±15.2
18.9 ±0.5
105.9 ±1.4
29.9 ±1.1
342 7 + 142
38.8 ±6.0
65.2 ±2.5
94.2 ±2.5
19.9 ±0.9
39.3 ±1.1
2.9 ±0.2
0.3 ±0.0
2.0 ±0.1
17.4 ±0.5
5.5 ±0.2
18.2 ±1.2
12.5 ±0.4
11. 7 ±0.4
0.0 ±0.1
2.0 ±3.5
0.2 ±0.1
0.9 ±0.1
0.9 ±0.1
4.7 ±0.5
2.8 ±0.3
3.3 ±0.5
4.0 ±0.5
10.5 ±1.2
0.1 ±0.1
8.8 ±1.3
1.7 ±0.3
2.4 ±0.6
1.0 ±0.4
1.7 ±0.3
1.1 ±0.5
11. 5 ±3.9
0.3 ±0.1
0.0 ±1.0
0.0 ±0.2
0.0 ±0.5
515±14
301 ±8
12±0
17±1
66 ± 10
2 ±10
41 .2 ±8.5
6.0 ±0.2
19.3 ±0.4
15.4± 1.1
48 9 + 2 9
1.1 ±0.3
15.0 ±0.7
31 .8 ± 1.0
5.5 ±0.4
25.1 ±0.8
3.1 ±0.2
0.6 ±0.1
3.9 ±0.3
16.3 ±0.7
66.3 ±3.1
6.3 ±0.5
10.5 ±0.4
16.1 ±0.8
1.3 ±0.2
28.2 ±11. 3
0.1 ±0.1
0.6 ±0.1
0.7 ±0.1
2.3 ±0.3
1.2±0.1
1.3 ±0.3
2.1 ±0.4
7.5 ±1.2
0.1 ±0.1
7.2 ±1.7
0.0 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.3
0.0 ±0.2
0.5 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.3
39.5 ±3.9
0.3 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.5
0.0 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.4
2520 ± 71
1735 ±44
70 ±2
86 ±3
343 ± 20
28 ±13
33.2 ± 13.2
22.8 ±0.8
105.2 ±1.9
24.0 ±1.0
190.8 ±8.3
27.0 ±3.8
60.1 ±2.7
87.9 ±3.4
14.9 ±0.8
51 .7 ±2.0
3.6 ±0.3
0.5 ±0.1
5.2 ±0.3
22.4 ±0.8
7.7 ±0.3
19.4 ±1.8
28.1 ±1.5
30.1 ±1.5
0.0 ±0.1
4.7 ±4.3
0.4 ±0.1
0.3 ±0.1
0.6 ±0.1
4.2 ± 0.4
3.4 ±0.3
3.1 ±0.4
3.8 ±0.5
10.9 ±1.3
0.1 ±0.2
11.1 ±1.9
7.5 ±0.6
1.4 ±0.3
0.9 ±0.2
0.5 ±0.1
0.7 ±0.3
14.4 ±2.1
0.3 ±0.1
1.2 ±0.6
0.0 ±0.2
0.0 ±0.2
4732 ±119
2800 ± 66
140 ±4
138 ±5
576 ± 27
69 ±22
81 .2 ±18.6
36.9 ±1.2
148.4 ±2.6
43.0 ± 1.5
215.5 ±9. 7
5.3 ±1.0
100.7 ±4.6
158.1 ±4.8
32.5 ± 1.8
119.1 ±3.7
13.0 ±0.7
0.7 ±0.1
22.1 ± 1.2
74.2 ± 2.0
36.9 ± 1.0
39.5 ±3.1
73.8 ±3.1
80.2 ±3.1
0.1 ±0.1
10.6 ±6.1
0.4 ±0.1
1.3 ±0.2
0.7 ±0.1
2.3 ±0.3
1.7 ±0.2
1.4 ±0.3
1.3 ±0.3
3.0 ±0.5
0.0 ±0.2
2.8 ±0.5
18.1 ± 1.4
16.6 ±2.0
19.9 ±2.0
0.3 ±0.1
8.1 ±1.2
64.1 ±3.1
2.5 ±0.4
11. 5 ±3.8
1.5 ±0.6
0.0 ±1.4
1390 ±23
942 ± 14
30 ±1
42 ± 1
138 ±9
3±9
30.9 ± 6.5
10.7 ±0.3
36.0 ± 0.5
15.9 ±0.5
62.9 ±2.0
4.1 ±0.4
17.7 ±0.5
36.9 ± 0.8
6.0 ±0.3
33.8 ± 0.8
2.3 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.0
2.8 ±0.1
12.4 ±0.3
4.7 ±0.1
7.5 ±0.4
9.1 ±0.3
11.1 ±0.4
0.2 ± 0.0
1.3 ±2.3
0.1 ±0.0
0.5 ±0.0
0.2 ±0.0
1.7±0.1
1.3±0.1
0.8 ±0.1
3.2 ±0.3
8.5 ±0.8
0.1 ±0.1
6.4 ±0.7
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.5
0.0 ±0.2
0.0 ±0.3
763 ±17
377 ±7
15±0
13±0
47 ±6
1 ±9
17.1 ±6.8
4.7 ±0.1
9.7 ±0.1
6.9 ±0.3
15.1 ±0.5
0.0 ±0.1
6.7 ±0.2
18.3 ±0.4
1.5±0.1
22.5 ±0.6
2.2 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.0
2.6 ±0.1
6.9 ±0.2
3.5 ±0.1
3.4 ±0.2
7.7 ±0.2
9.0 ±0.3
0.1 ±0.0
1.2 ±1.7
0.0 ±0.0
0.3 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.6 ±0.1
0.5 ±0.0
0.2 ±0.1
1.5 ±0.1
3.8 ±0.3
0.0 ±0.0
3.2 ±0.4
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.6
0.0 ±0.2
0.0 ±0.5
-------
Table S3 (continued). Speciated emission rates for composite diesel and gasoline exhaust profiles.
Species Description
Steranes fug/mile)
C27-20S-13B(H),17a(H)-
diasterane
C27-20R-13B(H),17a(H)-
diasterane
C28-20S-13B(H),17a(H)-
diasterane
C27-20S5a(H),14a(H)-
cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14B(H)-
cholestane
C27-20S5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-
cholestane
C27-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-
cholestane&C29-
20S1 3S(H), 1 7a(H)-diasterane
C28-20R5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-
ergostane
C28-20S5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-
ergostane
C28-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-
ergostane
C29-20S5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-
stigmastane
C29-20R5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-
stigmastane
C29-20S5a(H),14B(H),17B(H)-
stigmastane
C29-20R5a(H),14a(H),17a(H)-
stigmastane
Hopanes fug/mile)
18a(H),21S(H)-22,29,30-
Trisnorhopane
17a(H),21S(H)-22,29,30-
Trisnorhopane
1 7a(H),21 S(H)-30-Norhopane
17a(H),21B(H)-Hopane
22S-17a(H),21S(H)-30-
Homohopane
22R-17a(H),21S(H)-30-
Homohopane
22S-17a(H),21S(H)-30,31-
Bishomohopane
22R-17a(H),21S(H)-30,31-
Bishomohopane
22S-17a(H),21S(H)-30,31,32-
Trisomohopane
Nmemonic
STER35
STER36
STER39
STER42
STER43
STER44
STER45_40
STER47
STER48
STER49
STER50
STER51
STER52
STER53
HOP13
HOP15
HOP17
HOP19
HOP21
HOP22
HOP24
HOP25
HOP26
HDD
44.8 ±3. 3
28.6 ±3.1
7.5 ±2.8
25. 8 ±3. 5
29.8 ±4.5
33.6 ±4.9
14.7 ±3.1
0.6 ±2. 6
0.0 ±2.6
0.2 ±2.6
0.1 ±2.6
0.3 ±2.6
0.4 ±2.6
0.2 ±2.6
41. 7 ±4.6
0.1 ±2.6
124.1 ±17.2
56. 4 ±6. 5
0.2 ±2. 6
0.0 ±2. 6
0.0 ±2.6
0.0 ±2.6
0.0 ±2. 6
HCS
59. 5 ±6.1
33.2 ±5.4
0.3 ±4.9
31.6±6.4
43.1 ±8.4
0.6 ±4.9
0.8 ±4.9
0.9 ±4.9
0.0 ±4.9
0.2 ±4.9
0.2 ±4.9
0.4 ±4.9
0.5 ±4.9
0.2 ±4.9
82.9 ±9.1
0.0 ±4.9
193.4 ±33.0
89.5 ±12. 4
0.0 ±4.9
0.0 ±4.9
0.0 ±4.9
0.0 ±4.9
0.0 ±4.9
HW
30.1 ±2.7
24.1 ±2.9
14.7 ±2.8
20.0 ±3.1
16.5 ±3.3
66.5 ±8.4
28. 7 ±3. 9
0.2 ±2.0
0.0 ±2.0
0.2 ±2.0
0.1 ±2.0
0.2 ±2.0
0.3 ±2.0
0.1 ±2.0
0.5 ±2.0
0.1 ±2.0
54.7 ±9.5
23.3 ±3. 7
0.4 ±2.0
0.1 ±2.0
0.0 ±2.0
0.0 ±2.0
0.0 ±2.0
MDD
34.1 ±11.2
25.3 ±11. 2
23.2 ±12.0
16.2±11.2
24.1 ±12.1
15.3±11.3
41.9±12.2
22.8 ±12.0
0.0±11.2
24.4 ±11. 6
8.5±11.2
14.0±11.2
0.0±11.2
1.4±11.2
6.2±11.3
0.0±11.2
34.6 ±17.6
82.4 ±12. 4
4.5±11.2
6.9±11.3
1.4±11.2
0.0±11.2
0.0±11.2
SI BC
0.4 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.0
0.2 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.5 ±0.1
0.4 ±0.1
0.5 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
0.2 ±0.0
0.7 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.0
0.3 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.0
0.3 ±0.1
0.0±0.1
0.3 ±0.3
0.7 ±0.2
4.6 ±0.9
0.0 ±0.1
2. 9 ±0.7
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
SI BW
0.3 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.1
0.3 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.1
0.4 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
0.7 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
0.4 ±0.0
0.2±0.1
0.7 ±0.2
0.4 ±0.3
0.5 ±0.1
3. 8 ±0.7
0.0 ±0.1
1.9±0.5
0.1 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
SI HC
1.7±0.2
1.3±0.1
1.3±0.2
1.1 ±0.2
3.9 ±0.6
1.9 ±0.3
5.0 ±0.7
1.2±0.2
1.7±0.2
1.9±0.3
1.4±0.2
3. 2 ±0.5
3.4 ±0.2
2.0 ±0.3
1.9±0.3
1.4±0.9
10.9 ±1.0
16. 5 ±2.0
3. 9 ±0.4
9.2±1.4
1.8±0.2
1.3±0.2
1.7 ±0.3
SI HW
1.3±0.1
1.0±0.1
0.9±0.1
0.0 ±0.0
2.6 ±0.3
1.6±0.2
4.2 ±0.5
1.2±0.2
0.9±0.1
3.8 ±0.5
0.8 ±0.1
2.0 ±0.4
3.4 ±0.2
1.2 ±0.2
0.8 ±0.2
2.4±1.3
6.6 ±0.9
16.1 ±1.7
2. 2 ±0.4
5.3±1.1
1.2±0.1
0.8 ±0.2
0.8 ±0.3
SI LC
0.3 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.5±0.1
0.2 ±0.0
0.6 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
1.6±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.5 ±0.0
0.2 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
0.2 ±0.1
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
SI LW
0.3 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.3 ±0.0
0.2 ±0.0
0.8 ±0.1
0.8 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
3. 7 ±0.3
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.1 ±0.1
0.1 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
0.0 ±0.0
-------
Data Quality and Analysis of Dilution Tunnel Blanks
Figure SI shows comparisons of PM emission rates determined by BKI and UWV from
their primary dilution tunnels versus the corresponding gravimetric mass data obtained by DRI
from the secondary dilution tunnel sampler. The generally good agreement between PM mass
measured prior to and after the secondary dilution sampler indicates that the additional residence
time and secondary dilution, in the case of the CI tests, had little effect on the measured
gravimetric mass. Reconstruction of the total mass concentration by summing the TOR, 1C, AC ,
and XRF species gives good agreement with gravimetric mass as shown in Figure S2. As
expected, the reconstructed mass is slightly less since elements have not been converted to their
common oxide forms and ammonium is the only cation included, and OC was not converted to
organic matter by applying a factor (31) to account for the missing hydrogen, oxygen and other
elements that may be present in organic compounds. Sulfate and potassium ions were subtracted
from the XRF sulfur and potassium values. There is a positive offset in the material balance for
diesel vehicles at lower concentrations, which is due to the semi-volatile carbon species that are
emitted by diesel engines (e.g., fuel-related alkanes). These species are collected on the quartz
filter and detected by TOR. They are not adsorbed by the Teflon filters that are weighed for mass
concentration.
Table S3 shows the mass loadings in the dynamic blanks relative to composite SI and CI
exhaust samples. Dynamic blanks were also composited for better analytical sensitivity. A total
of six 58-minute blanks were collected during the light-duty vehicle phase, but one (blank #4)
was invalidated due to a system malfunction. The first blank was collected prior to the initial
vehicle test. Subsequent blanks were collected after vehicle category 2, and during category 5, 8,
and 9. All blanks were collected prior to the start of the day's testing, except for the final blank
(#6), which was collected about one hour after the last test of the day. The first three SI blanks
are consistent in composition and were composited as SI_DB1. Blank 5 (SI_DB2) is similar to
the first three but contains slightly increased amounts of higher temperature organic carbon and
the elements Al, Ca, Si, and Fe. Ions, which are likely artifacts of ambient air infiltration, show
similar proportions among the blanks. In contrast to the others, blank 6 (SI_DB3) contains
substantial amounts of elemental carbon and higher concentrations of all organic carbon
components plus relatively large concentrations of Zn, Ca, Fe, and Si. In addition, this sample
48
-------
differs from the other dynamic blanks in that the gravimetric mass concentration is more
consistent with the total carbon measured suggesting that the compounds evolved in the TOR
analysis were primarily in the particle phase.
The speciation of heavy (5-7 rings) PAHs for the blanks is consistent with the exhaust
samples, but the absolute concentrations measured were larger for the blanks than for many of
the low-emitting vehicle tests. Thus, the dynamic blanks cannot be considered representative of
'background' levels for these compounds. Hopanes and steranes did not display any consistency
in speciation for the dynamic blanks, due to the analytical uncertainty at such low concentrations.
Finally, a very different composition of heavy PAH compounds is present in blank SI_DB3. All
other dynamic blanks were collected at the start of the sampling day, whereas blank SI_DB3 was
collected at the end of the day following vehicle tests with high emission levels that
contaminated the exhaust dilution system.
A total of 11 blanks were collected during the CI phase and composited into 5 groups for
analysis. These blanks were collected for 30 minutes, except the first and last blanks (blanks 9
and 3), which were run for 60 minutes. Although most dynamic blanks were collected prior to
the start of the day's testing, several were also collected mid-day and one in the afternoon. The
composition of the CI blanks was quite consistent except for Blank Illn, which was collected
without secondary dilution. Blank 5 showed slightly increased amounts of the higher temperature
carbon compounds, Ca, Si, and Fe, plus sulfate and Zn. Several samples have significant
concentration of sulfate ion, which may be due, in large part, to ambient air infiltration. Total
carbon measured on the quartz filters generally far exceeds the gravimetric mass on the Teflon
filters similar to the SI blanks. The heavy PAHs in the blanks are not consistent in with the
speciation in the exhaust compounds and hopanes and steranes concentrations in the blanks were
not present in analytically significant levels.
49
-------
Table S4. Mass loadings in dynamic blanks relative to composite SI and CI exhaust samples *.
Vehicle
Group
SI DB1
SI_DB2
SI_DB3
SI- 1
SI- 2
SI- 3
SI- 4
SI- 5
SI- 6
SI- 7
SI- 8
SI- 9
SI-10
Blank-3
Blank-9
Blank-I
Blank-Ill
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD
HDD
Blank-IIIn
HDD
HDD
Weight
Class
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
LD
Dyn
Dyn
Dyn
Dyn
I
II
II
III
III
I
II
II
III
III
Dyn
III
III
Test
Cycle
Blank
Blank
Blank
UDC
UDC
UDC
UDC
UDC
UDC
UDC
UDC
UDC
UDC
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
HCS
HCS
HCS
HCS
HCS
HW
HW
HW
HW
HW
Blank
HCS
HW
Secondary
Dilution
Ratio
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
22
49
37
37
40
30
40
40
50
40
30
40
40
50
1
1
1
PM2.5 mass
(ug/m3)
2.2 +7- 2.7
6.1+7-2.7
107.8+7-2.8
169.3+7- 1.1
89.3+7-2.3
33.3+7- 1.1
140.6+7- 1.2
112.1 +7- 1.6
102.2+7- 1.5
346.2+7- 1.8
788.9 +7- 2.2
1055.2+7- 1.7
2693.4 +7- 5.0
25.5 +7- 5.9
22.3 +7- 2.7
1.0+7-3.0
4.4+7-3.0
40.8+7-2.2
249.1 +7-5.8
36.7+7-2.3
90.5+7- 1.9
111.5+7-3.4
43.4+7-2.3
556.5 +7- 6.3
56.5 +7- 2.5
82.9 +7- 2.0
114.6+7-3.0
187.9 +7- 9.0
4985.8 +7- 15.2
5799.9 +7- 13.2
Total Carbon
(ug7m3)
14.9+7- 1.6
24.2+7-1.8
113.3 +7-4.3
108.3+7-2.9
64.1+7-1.7
27.5 +7- 1.0
77.8+7-2.2
91.5+7-1.3
133.8+7-1.7
331.9+7-4.6
669.6 +7- 12.9
962.4+7-13.5
2428.2+7-31.4
94.0+7-6.1
33.7+7-2.5
40.2 +7- 2.2
34.9+7-2.1
85.2+7-2.1
285.2 +7- 16.2
83.1 +7-2.2
141.8+7-3.0
162.9+7-5.7
97.2+7-2.5
621.7+7-34.8
115.7+7-3.1
137.9 +7- 2.9
168.5 +7- 5.3
257.6+7- 11.0
5063.4+7-206.4
4837.7 +7- 240.8
OC
(ug7m3)
14.1 +7- 1.6
21.4+7- 1.8
51.1 +7-3.0
77.4 +7- 3.2
45.0+7- 1.7
19.4+7-0.9
37.8+7- 1.6
67.8+7- 1.4
90.8+7- 1.5
280.0 +7- 6.2
465.8 +7- 14.9
307.5 +7- 5.7
1881.7+7-35.4
83.6+7-6.0
28.1+7-2.3
39.7+7-2.1
34.2 +7- 2.0
55.4+7-1.7
82.1 +7-6.0
53.8+7- 1.7
62.3+7- 1.7
65.5+7-2.8
61.0+7- 1.9
166.8+7-11.0
69.7 +7- 2.2
68.7+7- 1.8
66.3+7-2.6
173.9 +7- 8.4
1355.5+7-58.2
1763.9+7-98.1
EC
(ug7m3)
0.8 +7- 0.3
2.8 +7- 0.3
62.2 +7- 2.6
31.0+7-0.9
19.1+7-0.5
8.2 +7- 0.3
40.0+7- 1.2
23.7+7-0.4
43.0+7-0.7
51.9+7-0.7
203.7+7-3.8
654.9+7- 11.8
546.5 +7- 10.4
10.5+7-6.8
5.5 +7- 0.5
0.4 +7- 0.4
0.7 +7- 0.6
29.9 +7- 0.7
203.1+7- 11.3
29.3 +7- 0.7
79.5+7-1.7
97.4+7-3.5
36.2 +7- 0.8
454.9+7-25.3
46.0+7- 1.2
69.2+7- 1.4
102.2 +7- 3.4
83.8+7-4.8
3707.9+7- 155.2
3073.8+7-153.2
particulate PAH
(ng7m3)
383.6 +7- 34.4
540.3 +7- 99.7
263.9 +7- 49.8
873.3 +7- 110.5
383.6 +7- 34.4
25.8+7-6.1
319.1 +7-38.6
93.4+7-8.1
155.6+7- 11.6
171.1 +7- 10.7
1618.9+7- 137.4
6515.6+7-801.8
3828.9 +7- 228.5
0.9+7-20.4
0.0 +7- 7.9
0.8 +7- 3.8
0.0+7-4.8
2.4+7-4.1
0.3 +7- 16.3
0.5 +7- 4.5
0.9+7-2.1
4.1 +7-4.9
1.2+7-2.9
0.0+7- 17.1
0.0+7-4.1
0.0+7- 1.3
0.0 +7- 4.9
3.0 +7- 6.6
89.9 +7- 18.9
40.0+7- 11.8
Hopanes
(ng7m3)
5.3 +7- 7.7
8.6 +7- 18.7
1197.0+7-345.6
18.3 +7- 6.0
5.3 +7- 7.7
13.1+7-7.5
3.7+7-2.9
1.4+7- 1.5
31.8+7-6.3
670.5 +7- 54.0
975.6 +7- 70.5
1640.2 +7- 105.6
2220.3 +7- 102.9
36.6 +7- 10.8
0.0 +7- 9.6
67.0 +7- 4.3
52.6 +7- 6.3
41.3+7- 13.2
56.9 +7- 4.6
46.6 +7- 5.7
46.3 +7- 9.5
78.9+7- 12.1
Steranes
(ng7m3)
58.0 +7- 3.7
107.3 +7- 24.7
345.7+7-42.8
53.1 +7-4.9
58.0 +7- 3.7
111.7+7- 11.4
30.4 +7- 3.7
165.0+7-6.2
261.4+7- 10.7
493.8 +7- 18.0
525.5+7-22.1
476.2 +7- 24.9
1958.5 +7- 64.2
39.0 +7- 12.5
42.2 +7- 12.4
144.7+7-4.6
63.8 +7- 5.6
72.6 +7- 13.9
87.1 +7-2.8
121.4+7-6.4
137.7 +7- 9.6
214.5+7- 12.5
* Particulate PAH values are sum sof benzo(bjk)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo(ah+ac)anthracene and coronene, and carbon data are based on IMPROVE TOR method.
-------
LDGV PM Emission Rate (mg/mi)
400
300
> 200
100
100
y= 1.18x + 0.62
R2 = 0.99
y=1.08x-0.18
R2 = 0.95
200
DRI
300
400
HDDV PM Emission Rate (mg/mi)
1500
1200 -
900 -
600 -
300 -
y = 0.98x + 47.53
R2 = 0.83
y = 0.95x +52.77
R2 = 0.84
0 300 600 900
DRI
1200 1500
Figure SI. Comparisons of PM emission rates determined by EPA/BKI and UWV from their
primary dilution tunnel versus the corresponding values obtained by DRI from the secondary
dilution tunnel sampler.
51
-------
I
I
4000
2000 3000 4000
gravimetric mass (ugffilter)
1000
1500 2000 2500
gravimetric mass (ugffilter)
3000 3500
4000
Figure S2. Correlation plot of gravimetric mass vs. sum of elements by XRF, ions by 1C and
AA, and carbon by TOR for light-duty vehicles (top panel) heavy-duty diesel vehicles (bottom
panel).
52
-------
Kansas City PM Characterization Study
Final Report
Appendix NN
Round 1 and 2 Average Emission Data
Assessment and Standards Division
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Sponsors:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
STAPPA-ALAPCO Emission Inventory Improvement Program
Coordinating Research Council Inc. (Project No. E-69)
Prepared for EPA by
Eastern Research Group, Incorporated
Austin, TX
Bevilacqua-Knight Incorporated
Oakland, CA
NuStats LLC
Austin, TX
Desert Research Institute
Reno,NV
EPA Contract No. GS10F-0036K
October 27,2006
Revised April 2008 by EPA staff
v>EPA
United States EPA420-R-08-009
Environmental Protection . ., „„„
Agency April 2008
-------
Round 1 and 2 Phase and Composite Average Emission Data
Calculated from Second-by-Second Data from the EPA's
Dynamometer Analyzers
(EPA modified this data file from the Contractor's submitted
Results after performing additional QA/QC procedures)
Legend:
avg: average emission rate for the number of vehicles tested
std: standard deviation on the emission rate for the number of vehicles tested
cv: coefficient of variance (standard deviation/average) on the emission rate for the
number of vehicles tested
min: minimum emission value record for the number of vehicles tested
max: maximum emission value record for the number of vehicles tested
-------
Round
Bin
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
#of
vehicles
2
16
19
41
7
58
44
53
Composite SBS Phase 1
THC
g/mile
17.04
10.89
63.92
9.34
24.74
8.69
8.34
96.08
2.96
33.60
4.30
1.15
26.63
2.39
5.93
2.05
1.08
52.48
0.54
6.00
17.66
6.34
35.91
9.51
24.19
5.70
4.10
72.01
1.91
25.00
3.37
1.19
35.22
1.76
6.98
2.00
1.05
52.27
0.40
5.88
CO
g/mile
203.52
69.82
34.31
154.15
252.90
80.01
80.61
100.74
14.47
308.17
34.66
19.59
56.53
15.68
83.91
14.10
8.95
63.47
2.20
43.28
250.41
164.95
65.87
51.84
460.48
43.34
44.91
103.62
9.97
271.53
25.78
17.89
69.41
7.34
84.06
12.76
7.92
62.04
1.22
50.93
CO2
g/mile
859.57
115.85
13.48
777.65
941 .49
664.90
139.01
20.91
415.31
936.07
770.23
127.26
16.52
558.69
1048.85
815.98
104.14
12.76
627.39
1120.21
676.00
158.79
23.49
384.51
811.22
647.44
124.91
19.29
356.28
913.64
634.01
128.26
20.23
407.06
866.92
634.13
112.56
17.75
382.65
855.73
NOX
g/mile
2.84
1.95
68.50
1.47
4.22
4.02
1.98
49.22
1.79
7.55
4.19
1.32
31.49
1.76
7.02
1.99
1.25
62.43
0.12
5.27
2.61
2.60
99.77
0.53
7.79
4.20
2.09
49.91
0.96
8.25
2.92
1.04
35.59
0.56
5.14
1.87
1.16
62.34
0.00
6.33
PM
m g/mile
87.80
107.12
122.01
12.05
163.54
93.80
166.21
177.20
3.75
662.78
14.48
24.60
169.90
1.45
105.95
9.58
0.99
10.37
0.13
4.22
160.77
108.00
67.18
56.76
326.53
35.02
76.00
217.04
2.38
461.18
11.43
10.23
89.52
1.65
38.47
7.40
10.50
141.86
0.17
61.94
-------
Round
Composite SBS
Bin
1
avg
std
cv
min
max
2
avg
std
cv
min
max
3
avg
std
cv
min
max
4
avg
std
cv
min
max
5
avg
std
cv
min
max
6
avg
std
cv
min
max
7
avg
std
cv
min
max
8
avg
std
cv
min
max
THC
g/mile
6.06
7.13
117.68
1.02
11.10
2.58
4.23
163.89
0.13
16.60
0.47
0.48
101.06
0.04
1.77
0.11
0.19
168.13
0.00
0.86
7.45
5.43
72.90
0.77
14.39
1.25
1.51
120.79
0.04
10.01
0.34
0.51
151.76
0.04
3.08
0.08
0.11
134.35
0.00
0.59
CO
g/mile
64.94
56.41
86.86
25.05
104.83
41.25
60.97
147.80
0.24
192.37
6.62
3.84
58.09
0.71
15.52
2.12
2.71
127.76
0.07
12.64
113.63
88.68
78.04
9.52
254.04
15.72
19.20
122.11
0.95
129.88
8.53
10.39
121.72
0.19
48.23
2.81
3.65
130.20
0.05
23.92
CO2
g/mile
594.34
57.93
9.75
553.38
635.31
408.36
85.89
21.03
264.00
583.04
476.13
68.35
14.36
350.33
621.69
480.59
60.92
12.68
393.11
665.09
407.01
102.90
25.28
257.18
482.49
388.74
69.28
17.82
152.96
521.13
377.44
65.39
17.32
277.17
529.87
366.91
52.77
14.38
240.12
487.13
Phase 2
NOX
g/mile
2.92
2.50
85.79
1.15
4.69
2.29
1.41
61.68
0.32
5.74
1.89
1.20
63.56
0.29
5.59
0.51
0.68
132.60
0.04
4.03
2.72
2.56
93.88
0.23
7.45
2.61
1.97
75.66
0.32
6.78
1.16
0.83
71.93
0.15
4.34
0.42
0.45
107.73
0.02
3.46
PM
m g/mile
45.05
50.21
111.47
9.54
80.55
37.65
65.56
174.15
1.06
261.52
11.13
16.73
150.35
0.50
56.14
4.01
5.11
127.40
0.36
30.22
73.09
99.22
135.76
2.83
266.15
18.94
34.58
182.54
0.19
181.80
7.54
9.23
122.41
0.24
41.35
2.48
5.62
226.18
0.12
51.12
-------
Round
Composite SBS
Bin
1
avg
std
cv
min
max
2
avg
std
cv
min
max
3
avg
std
cv
min
max
4
avg
std
cv
min
max
5
avg
std
cv
min
max
6
avg
std
cv
min
max
7
avg
std
cv
min
max
8
avg
std
cv
min
max
THC
g/mile
8.54
8.63
101.02
2.44
14.65
5.06
7.68
151.72
0.47
31.09
1.33
2.58
194.66
0.24
3.05
0.31
0.59
192.23
0.01
3.27
11.85
9.65
81.46
1.58
26.65
2.62
2.60
99.09
0.22
14.68
0.94
1.14
121.91
0.03
5.38
0.20
0.22
107.65
0.00
1.15
CO
g/mile
68.45
50.28
73.45
32.90
104.01
51.87
74.68
143.97
0.29
272.67
11.96
6.96
58.23
3.45
28.65
3.55
5.38
151.63
-0.01
24.85
137.86
98.89
71.73
10.48
282.77
21.62
22.80
105.48
1.82
118.87
10.01
13.77
137.50
0.50
83.61
2.78
2.47
88.71
0.01
12.43
CO2
g/mile
647.32
155.95
24.09
537.04
757.59
528.49
108.59
20.55
378.50
781.81
636.71
97.57
15.32
378.50
858.74
648.30
83.11
12.82
502.27
869.04
515.28
131.00
25.42
285.12
611.56
527.28
105.58
20.02
256.59
751.57
510.75
107.70
21.09
339.75
760.06
492.57
81.98
16.64
321.70
688.15
Phase 3
NOX
g/mile
2.90
0.73
25.32
2.38
3.42
2.65
1.57
59.22
0.26
6.01
2.54
1.47
58.11
0.40
6.19
0.79
1.24
157.40
0.00
6.71
2.87
2.82
98.37
0.31
8.19
3.33
2.43
72.93
0.45
8.39
1.61
1.12
69.90
0.09
4.86
0.60
0.70
116.27
0.01
5.76
PM
m g/mile
9.14
9.08
99.34
2.72
15.56
51.05
98.67
193.28
0.63
345.61
14.41
24.99
173.43
1.25
86.79
2.33
2.10
90.40
0.16
7.59
63.73
86.50
135.73
3.56
200.85
8.79
15.51
176.55
0.35
87.15
5.08
7.73
152.28
0.05
37.95
1.80
3.34
185.69
0.09
28.15
-------
Round
Composite SBS Total
Bin
1
avg
std
cv
min
max
2
avg
std
cv
min
max
3
avg
std
cv
min
max
4
avg
std
cv
min
max
5
avg
std
cv
min
max
6
avg
std
cv
min
max
7
avg
std
cv
min
max
8
avg
std
cv
min
max
THC
g/mile
1.89
1.76
92.82
0.65
3.14
0.94
1.22
130.78
0.18
5.02
0.31
0.13
42.11
0.14
0.58
0.12
0.09
75.04
0.03
0.51
2.20
1.34
61.12
0.59
3.93
0.53
0.45
85.54
0.12
2.97
0.24
0.15
62.25
0.10
0.90
0.11
0.06
56.61
0.02
0.35
CO
g/mile
19.81
12.24
61.76
11.16
28.47
10.70
12.67
118.37
0.66
44.88
2.88
1.23
42.57
1.16
5.54
1.04
0.84
81.57
0.20
3.54
30.18
20.84
69.05
3.84
60.56
4.76
4.83
101.51
0.99
28.97
2.58
2.29
88.93
0.57
11.28
1.00
0.64
63.63
0.09
3.30
CO2
g/mile
136.89
17.46
12.75
124.55
149.24
100.75
20.59
20.44
66.80
144.23
118.96
18.01
15.14
88.48
157.76
121.88
14.74
12.09
97.84
166.49
100.38
24.67
24.58
59.57
119.36
98.69
18.68
18.93
45.82
133.65
95.67
18.26
19.09
65.77
136.23
93.51
14.83
15.86
59.84
126.04
NOX
g/mile
0.60
0.40
66.46
0.32
0.88
0.56
0.30
53.50
0.16
1.22
0.52
0.24
46.72
0.13
1.23
0.18
0.18
99.12
0.00
0.90
0.56
0.54
96.53
0.06
1.58
0.64
0.42
66.02
0.12
1.54
0.34
0.18
52.92
0.10
0.95
0.16
0.12
78.51
0.00
0.96
PM
m g/mile
44.80
50.34
112.38
9.20
80.39
48.70
77.06
158.23
6,55
287.25
12.37
17.58
142.08
1.39
60.76
4.21
4.66
110.81
0.41
26.97
77.09
95.32
123.65
5.75
261.02
19.24
32.29
167.83
0.80
163.74
8.22
8.97
109.17
0.35
37.36
2.86
5.89
206.31
0.40
49.61
-------
Round
Bin
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
avg
std
cv
min
max
#of
vehicles
9
35
34
64
17
51
48
40
Composite SBS Phase 1
THC
g/mile
14.14
8.06
56.98
2.94
31.57
12.25
7.21
58.87
3.71
32.73
5.92
2.54
42.80
2.37
11.55
3.76
2.50
66.46
0.22
11.53
16.82
6.91
41.11
6.51
31.08
8.83
5.67
64.19
2.47
31.64
6.37
4.56
71.65
1.96
29.10
4.11
2.14
52.03
1.00
9.99
CO
g/mile
216.01
161.81
74.91
6.36
465.91
156.37
96.22
61.53
43.28
481.45
79.06
44.49
56.28
19.88
192.41
35.75
24.33
68.05
0.72
103.93
251.28
126.44
50.32
99.87
480.88
113.86
81.06
71.19
22.33
356.29
89.09
97.47
109.40
16.09
538.94
39.35
28.60
72.69
3.71
152.82
CO2
g/mile
800.09
267.11
33.38
382.11
1195.00
699.87
133.91
19.13
454.80
963.81
776.50
139.10
17.91
508.91
1032.15
834.76
115.20
13.80
559.08
1194.48
767.71
177.28
23.09
490.04
1242.99
652.62
135.14
20.71
392.39
1121.23
701.82
129.72
18.48
411.83
967.28
700.27
116.65
16.66
444.64
903.50
NOX
g/mile
2.80
1.84
65.95
0.34
5.36
3.37
1.63
48.51
0.47
7.74
3.56
1.61
45.09
0.80
7.22
2.30
1.40
60.93
0.09
7.01
2.39
1.66
69.56
0.69
5.86
3.49
1.78
50.92
0.55
6.90
2.77
1.17
42.33
0.54
5.99
1.79
0.82
45.63
0.32
4.23
PM
m g/mile
281.33
417.87
148.53
4.90
1198.94
210.94
297.39
140.98
11.50
1436.68
40.05
39.71
99.14
3.99
152.80
40.84
82.95
203.12
1.88
601 .42
361.73
436.66
120.71
32.31
1652.50
114.81
188.21
163.93
6.83
1038.48
55.06
74.73
135.73
4.65
419.36
46.88
97.71
208.40
0.69
599.46
-------
Round
Composite SBS
Bin
1
avg
std
cv
min
max
2
avg
std
cv
min
max
3
avg
std
cv
min
max
4
avg
std
cv
min
max
5
avg
std
cv
min
max
6
avg
std
cv
min
max
7
avg
std
cv
min
max
8
avg
std
cv
min
max
THC
g/mile
4.46
4.70
105.51
0.30
15.38
1.78
3.10
174.31
0.09
13.26
0.49
0.71
144.55
0.03
2.59
0.14
0.23
160.09
0.01
1.18
3.00
3.29
109.74
0.46
14.75
1.61
2.50
155.02
0.06
16.45
0.46
1.60
351.78
0.03
11.19
0.08
0.06
74.07
0.02
0.25
CO
g/mile
51.12
27.96
54.70
2.43
91.67
23.64
39.48
167.01
0.27
209.20
7.48
8.17
109.14
0.33
40.47
2.89
3.84
132.89
0.08
20.25
48.03
46.80
97.44
5.49
185.39
21.60
33.19
153.65
1.77
169.89
9.37
33.41
356.53
0.20
234.74
2.24
2.02
90.19
0.09
6.63
CO2
g/mile
530.98
143.42
27.01
235.50
675.24
456.72
84.56
18.52
331.07
644.21
465.33
77.29
16.61
289.13
620.15
468.84
58.94
12.57
340.74
672.35
492.37
83.30
16.92
293.65
637.23
386.61
56.67
14.66
256.26
496.80
399.91
63.41
15.86
261.51
545.62
379.66
60.06
15.82
265.67
503.37
Phase 2
NOX
g/mile
2.94
1.53
52.19
1.33
5.29
2.40
1.07
44.69
0.60
4.98
1.60
1.24
77.70
0.14
5.33
0.64
0.76
118.15
0.01
5.10
2.89
1.74
60.09
0.73
7.12
2.26
1.68
74.27
0.11
5.20
1.03
0.65
63.46
0.17
3.60
0.38
0.33
86.34
0.03
1.29
PM
m g/mile
101.70
129.89
127.72
6.78
397.78
31.43
48.98
155.85
1.30
242.55
19.13
36.41
190.32
0.58
213.10
6.02
6.79
112.90
0.56
30.16
42.34
73.47
173.53
3.19
315.45
23.86
40.46
169.60
0.82
177.64
16.25
27.44
168.90
0.00
143.30
6.20
12.89
207.91
0.58
81.41
-------
Round
Composite SBS
Bin
1
avg
std
cv
min
max
2
avg
std
cv
min
max
3
avg
std
cv
min
max
4
avg
std
cv
min
max
5
avg
std
cv
min
max
6
avg
std
cv
min
max
7
avg
std
cv
min
max
8
avg
std
cv
min
max
THC
g/mile
7.17
8.18
113.96
0.77
26.28
3.67
6.43
175.24
0.49
27.94
1.18
1.18
100.22
0.18
4.12
0.30
0.46
155.28
0.00
2.70
4.73
4.89
103.36
0.97
22.73
2.81
3.98
141.99
0.16
27.33
1.00
2.28
228.58
0.11
15.87
0.12
0.11
90.87
0.00
0.42
CO
g/mile
57.96
39.25
67.72
1.50
98.82
20.91
25.31
121.07
0.17
115.07
10.54
7.44
70.55
2.18
31.35
3.48
3.97
114.11
-0.01
18.98
57.55
76.10
132.23
3.06
319.06
26.61
39.54
148.58
2.02
184.04
10.32
24.94
241.62
0.26
174.57
2.00
1.94
97.07
0.02
6.63
CO2
g/mile
618.29
167.67
27.12
290.82
798.96
566.51
107.10
18.90
392.64
879.91
587.15
97.84
16.66
388.94
793.56
609.72
84.50
13.86
400.05
878.59
609.40
112.65
18.49
351.11
781.44
493.37
79.21
16.06
299.20
658.33
525.38
100.37
19.10
334.68
762.26
494.48
88.92
17.98
342.29
658.48
Phase 3
NOX
g/mile
2.93
1.30
44.36
1.22
5.17
2.93
1.41
48.06
1.07
7.96
2.03
1.50
74.13
0.31
5.87
0.75
0.88
117.66
0.00
5.80
3.12
1.96
62.78
0.70
8.04
2.79
2.12
75.78
0.23
7.21
1.41
0.83
59.13
0.24
4.57
0.45
0.37
83.42
0.05
1.23
PM
m g/mile
28.12
34.39
122.31
0.89
95.79
22.16
38.91
175.60
0.92
140.20
5.22
6.08
116.49
0.39
26.44
3.26
3.67
112.34
0.05
26.31
14.31
17.96
125.45
2.66
73.58
13.68
24.97
182.52
1.48
116.82
6.70
10.81
161.50
0.15
60.50
4.21
4.86
115.33
0.09
25.13
-------
Round
Composite SBS Total
Bin
1
avg
std
cv
min
max
2
avg
std
cv
min
max
3
avg
std
cv
min
max
4
avg
std
cv
min
max
5
avg
std
cv
min
max
6
avg
std
cv
min
max
7
avg
std
cv
min
max
8
avg
std
cv
min
max
THC
g/mile
1.47
1.26
85.69
0.20
4.39
0.92
0.94
102.37
0.25
4.31
0.37
0.22
58.72
0.14
0.91
0.19
0.13
65.90
0.02
0.54
1.30
0.83
63.79
0.58
4.11
0.71
0.67
94.61
0.13
4.50
0.38
0.46
121.77
0.10
3.31
0.19
0.10
50.62
0.06
0.44
CO
g/mile
17.82
10.22
57.33
0.61
34.72
10.39
8.53
82.12
2.22
47.11
4.78
2.67
55.84
1.37
12.31
2.04
1.34
65.33
0.16
6.20
18.90
12.65
66.92
6.34
57.43
8.68
7.77
89.50
1.72
41.07
5.41
8.35
154.44
0.91
57.12
2.06
1.29
62.85
0.28
6.81
CO2
g/mile
123.74
34.37
27.78
57.02
163.09
108.71
20.21
18.59
75.32
161.75
114.33
19.07
16.68
73.80
150.26
118.81
15.09
12.70
84.74
168.82
117.49
20.97
17.85
73.77
162.82
95.86
15.20
15.85
61.17
134.62
101.08
16.95
16.77
64.05
133.20
97.47
15.90
16.31
67.81
124.68
NOX
g/mile
0.59
0.25
42.65
0.32
0.93
0.55
0.21
38.56
0.17
1.28
0.43
0.26
61.24
0.13
1.18
0.21
0.18
85.16
0.01
1.15
0.57
0.33
58.09
0.20
1.38
0.54
0.35
64.42
0.12
1.19
0.31
0.14
47.42
0.10
0.82
0.14
0.08
55.18
0.02
0.28
PM
m g/mile
106.13
134.87
127.08
6.38
416.66
39.69
51.77
130.45
2.85
231.92
20.65
33.50
162.20
1.00
188.57
7.92
8.30
104.77
0.75
36.05
57.47
79.56
138.43
7.46
332.43
28.17
43.99
156.13
1.24
181.59
18.51
26.52
145.60
1.05
132.98
8.23
14.19
172.33
1.19
83.25
------- |