&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
     Reusing
 Superfund Sites
 A

-------
                                                                                    Reusing Superfund  Sites
                                         Table of Contents
Introduction-
A Little Background -
Are These Cleaned-up Sites Safe?

Tools for Redevelopment	
Additional Help for Communities
A Realistic Look at the Reuse Process
Reuse Types —
Reuse Impacts on Communities —
Contacts and Sources of Information on Superfund Reuse —
&EPA
Office of Sol id Waste and
Emergency Response
Washington, DC 20460
EPA-540-R-06-063
OSWER 9230.0-85
October 2006
www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/

-------
 Reusing  Superfund  Sites
                                                                                                                               Introduction
Construction at the Tinkham Garage site. Source: EPA
The Tinkham Garage site in reuse. Source: EPA
   Shoppers bustling up and down the aisles of the new Home Depot store in Londonderry, New Hampshire,
   may find it hard to imagine that the property was once part of the Tinkham Garage Superfund site. This
was not a transformation that was easy or occurred overnight. Even after the property was cleaned up and
made safe, much of it remained idle for many years. It took the creativity and dedication of many parties
to make this success a reality. As Byron Mah, the  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) remedial
project manager for the site says, "When EPA and the stakeholders work together in a spirit of partnership,
good things can happen." In  the end, the transformation of the Superfund site into a commercial center
was a joint effort involving the citizens of two neighboring towns, the New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services (NHDES), EPA, the project developers and many others. This cooperation has paid
off with increased tax revenue, locally based jobs, and new opportunities for the community.

Asuspicious-looking foam and an unusual smell coming from a burbling brook were the first hints neighbors
had that something was wrong at the Tinkham Garage site. The Londonderry Health Department soon
confirmed their fears: tanktruck waste dumped atTinkham Garage had polluted the brook, the land nearby
and their drinking water. After an investigation, EPA listed Tinkham Garage in 1983 as one of the first high
priority Superfund sites.  Three years after putting the site on that list of the country's most hazardous
sites—the National Priorities  List (NPL)—EPA reached an agreement with some 600 responsible parties
to clean up the site, but for about 15 years after that cleanup much of the site remained vacant. It wasn't
until community members, developers and responsible parties began working with  EPA to overcome
misperceptionsand other obstacles that the idea of redevelopment caught hold. Today, in addition to the
Home Depot store, the Tinkham Garage site hosts a Staples office supply store, a Dunkin' Donuts shop, a
restaurant and a newly built active senior community where, according to Mah,"people are gearing up to
move in."

The original developer at the site, Reggie Ronzello, Sr., says that the redevelopment atTinkham Garage
ultimately brought together the two towns, despite a history of disagreements, and has resulted in benefits
for all parties involved. The town of Londonderry now has substantially higher tax revenue and hundreds
of new jobs. Redevelopment atTinkham Garage  is also leading to improvements in  traffic patterns in
the neighboring town of Derry, and citizens living near the site continue to benefit from redevelopment
through restored property values. In addition, EPA  benefited from the transformation atTinkham Garage
because a former Superfund  site is now clean, safe and in responsible, private ownership. "It has been a
very positive thing  for everyone,"says Ronzello.

-------
                                                                                                                     Reusing  Superfund  Sites
Londonderry is just one community among hundreds
that have discovered ways to transform a public eyesore
into a source of civic pride.   Areas that were once
health hazards are now being cleaned up and turned
into office  parks, athletic fields, commercial  centers,
residential areas, tourist attractions and nature preserves.
Sites that were abandoned  have become valuable
community resources. Instead of being a drag on the
local economy, many are now generating tax revenues
and spurring broader economic revitalization.

Though each  community faces unique  challenges,
EPA is making success stories like the one atTinkham
Garage possible at Superfund sites from coast to coast.
In  Coalinga, California, citizens worked with EPA and
the state Department of Health Services to redevelop
former asbestos mines and storage facilities as a Kmart
and a 43-unit apartment complex. The City of Coalinga
intends  to  use  the  new revenue generated by the
redevelopment to help fund  a city-wide revitalization
plan that includes a 30-acre wildlife management area.
West Dallas,Texas, used to be polluted with high levels of
lead from a smelter that released  a cloud of toxic smog
into the surrounding neighborhoods. Now, after EPA
and the Dallas Public Housing Authority joined forces
to  clean the site, the  area is experiencing a renaissance.
People are moving back into the  neighborhoods and a
supermarketwasrecentlybuilt. ResidentsinLibertyville,
Illinois, have a success story as well.
With help from local, state and federal agencies, they reclaimed
an old gravel quarry and converted it into a vast forest preserve
that includes a 115-acre lake for fishing and boating. Hundreds
of other Superfund  sites are  now success stories waiting
to happen.  Indeed, every Superfund site—no matter how
isolated—has potential for reuse.
                                                                         _   -* ,
                                                                               /**    •'
                                                                         • L   • r     i
                                                                                      *•
                                                                                                                           V
                                                     Locations of Superfund sites that are in reuse. Source: EPA

-------
 Reusing  Superfund  Sites
                                                                                                               A Little  Background
A sports complex, including six baseball and soccer fields, was built over waste contain-
ment areas at the Lipari Landfill Superfund site in Mantua Township, New Jersey.
Source: EPA
    During the 1970s, the dangers of abandoned industrial waste came to light in a dramatic way. A site
    called Love Canal, in New York, became emblematic of the crisis. Love Canal made national headlines
when homeowners discovered, in their basements and playgrounds, pools of chemicals that can cause
birth defects, miscarriages and a range of other health problems. In 1978, President Jimmy Carter approved
emergency funding to relocate 239 Love Canal families, and the nation soon learned that Love Canal
was not an isolated incident. Pockets of dangerous industrial wastes were being uncovered across the
country. Once alerted to these dangers, lawmakers passed the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund) to protect Americans from health risks posed by
contamination. In the decades since that time, the Superfund program has taken thousands of cleanup
actions to reduce health threats to Americans and the environment.  Cleanups have been completed at
more than 900 NPL sites around the country. Even the infamous Love Canal site has now been deleted
from the NPL.

As the number of cleanup-up sites grew, EPA saw that although  these former Superfund sites were clean
and safe, they were often  left idle  and abandoned. In some cases, the sites became eyesores and targets
for vandalism. EPA recognized that  as part of its mission to protect human health and the environment
it should expand its efforts to make  its cleanup activities consistent with community goals to reuse these
sites. In 1999, EPA launched the Superfund  Redevelopment Initiative (SRI), a coordinated national effort
to facilitate the return of the country's most hazardous sites  to productive use. Since its inception, the
Superfund Redevelopment Initiative has helped communities reclaim and reuse  thousands of acres of
idle land. Through an array of tools and partnerships,  SRI helps to provide local communities with new
opportunities to grow and prosper. Towns and villages around the country are recovering idle properties
as vibrant parts of community life.

Although SRI is a discrete program,  it works in the context of a  larger EPA effort, the Land Revitalization
Agenda (LRA). The LRA established  reuse as an important part of all  of the Agency's cleanup programs,
including,  in addition to  Superfund, those  dealing with  Brownfields, Federal Facilities, and properties
contaminated by waste management and  handling facilities and leaking underground storage tanks.
SRI's efforts complement this Agency-wide mission to support reuse, but focus on  sites in the Superfund
program.

-------
                                                                                                               Reusing  Superfund  Sites
Case Study   	
Superfund Redevelopment: Return to Use Initiative

 A s EPA gained experience in supporting reuse, it realized that certain barriers were unnecessarily
/xdelaying or limiting reuse at sites cleaned up before EPA began its focus on site reuse. In 2004,
EPA launched the Return to Use (RTU) Initiative to help communities reclaim former Superfund
sites where such barriers exist. The main purpose of the RTU Initiative is to remove barriers that
are not necessary for the protection of human health, the environment, or the remedy, at those
sites where remedies are already in place. Under the RTU Initiative EPA works with communities
to identify steps they can take to return sites to use  while still protecting human health and the
environment. This might mean taking down barbed wire or restrictive signs that are no longer
needed or installing a gate into a fence so that pedestrians and bicyclists can access a site in areas
where only motorized traffic needs to be excluded.

One community's experience with a 212-acre site in Missouri provides an example of how the
RTU Initiative works.

In the 1960s and 70s the two landfills at the Fulbright Landfill Superfund site were contaminated
with industrial  and residential  wastes from the Springfield area. EPA remediated the heavy
metal and cyanide contamination in the ground water and completed the cleanup in  1992, but
developers and townspeople were reluctant  to redevelop the site despite its prime location
near the Little Sac and South Dry Sac rivers. Legal restrictions and the legacy of contamination
associated with Superfund sites hampered its reuse potential;  but where others saw  daunting
risks, the community saw an opportunity. Springfield  citizens formed a stakeholder group. This
group, known as the Sac River and Fulbright Landfill Stakeholders Committee, planned the site's
reuse with the goal of integrating the Fulbright Landfill and the adjacent Sac River Landfill into
their urban landscape in Springfield. In the course  of six months, the Stakeholders Committee
identified reuse preferences and priorities forboth landfills, as well as goalsand recommendations
for the overall character of the area. In addition, Springfield residents created a plan for a greenway
with a trail along the Little Sac River and trees have been planted along the Dry Sac River. Much
work remains, and EPA will continue to consult with the Stakeholders Committee and with the
City of Springfield as they revise and implement the reuse plan.
                         m
Students plant ward willows along the South Dry Sac near the Fulbright Landfill.
Source: Springfield News-Leader

-------
 Reusing  Superfund Site
The former Butterworth Landfill site in the City of Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Source: EPA
Planned bike path at the former Butterworth Landfill. Source: EPA
  "In five or ten years,  I suspect no one will remember
                this was a Superfund site."
   - Mayor George Heartwell, Grand Rapids, Michigan, where the former
        Butterworth Landfill will be used, in part, as a bike path.
                                                                                      Are These Cleaned-up Sites  Safe?
\/_ _  The  Environmental Protection Agency's highest priority at any Superfund site is to protect
 I tTO. human health and the environment.  EPA must ensure that a site protects human health and
the environment before it can be reused. EPA takes careful and thorough measures to make sure that each
site meets this standard before it is returned to use. However, not all sites are protective for all  uses.  An
individual strategy is developed for each site to make certain that the cleanup, when complete, protects
human health and the environment for the land uses that can be reasonably anticipated.

One of the actions EPA takes is a thorough investigation of the contamination at each site. The investigation
tells EPA whether the contamination is a threat to human health or the environment and, if it is, describes
the nature and  extent of the contamination. After the  investigation, EPA meets with the  site owner, the
community and other interested  parties to  identify the reasonably anticipated future uses of the site. ^
reuse assessment, which involves collecting and evaluating information pertinent to reuse, can be done to
develop assumptions about reasonably anticipated land uses at Superfund sites. It may involve a review of
available records; visual inspections of the site; and discussions about potential future land uses with local
government officials, property owners and community members. Based on its investigations, EPA selects
a cleanup strategy tailored to the individual site that takes into account these anticipated uses.  Before
proceeding, EPA asks the community to comment on this strategy. Then site cleanup begins, and cannot
be considered complete until all cleanup goals are attained and all limitations are observed. After cleanup,
EPA monitors the site to guard against any  problems that may arise.  EPA ensures that reuse in no way
compromises safety. In fact, anecdotal evidence suggests that reusing Superfund sites helps to keep them
safe over time.  Research suggests that sites  being reused  are less prone to vandalism and other activities
that could harm the remedy.

Some sites are cleaned up for unrestricted access and use, meaning there are no use limitations based on
the environmental condition of the sites.  Other sites are cleaned up to be protective for specific types of
use.  For example, sites with long  histories of industrial use in  areas that are expected to remain industrial
are usually cleaned up to be protective for that use, but would not be suitable for other uses, such as
housing. In all cases, EPA specifies any use or activity limitations for its sites, for example"no residential use,"
"no use of ground water for drinking water,"or"no digging below a depth of four feet."

-------
                                                                                                                    Reusing Superfund  Sites
At a large number of Superfund sites, especially landfills, wastes are left
buried on site with protective covers of soil and other materials, often many
feet deep, to keep people from coming into contact with the wastes. As
long as users do not dig into the cover, there is no exposure to wastes. At
some  of these sites there may be gas vents or monitoring wells, which also
need  protection. Each site must be evaluated individually to determine
whether a particular use would interfere with its remedy components.

More  than 550 Superfund sites are already being safely reused and are
integrated into the fabric of their communities.  In towns across America,
the local supermarket or the high school soccer field may be located  on a
former Superfund site. These cleaned-up sites have a wide range of uses
including commercial, governmental, ecological and recreational.
New jobs as well as shopping opportunities are the result of reuse at Cabot Carbon/Koppers
Wood Treatment site in Gainsville, Florida. Source: EPA
                                                                     Remediation Strategies:
EPA considers anticipated future use when deciding on a site's remedy.  EPA then, to the
extent practicable, chooses cleanup techniques and technologies that are consistent with the
reasonable anticipated future use of the land. Below is a list of some cleanup techniques that
EPA uses to make sure that human health and the environment will be protected when sites are
appropriately used:

    1.   Off-Site Disposal: Moving contaminants away from the site to a facility that can safely
        handle them.
    2.   Recycling: Treating or converting toxic waste material to make it safe and reusing it for
        other purposes.
    3.   Containment:  Placing covers over toxic waste deposits or installing  barriers around
        them to prevent migration and to keep people from coming into contact with the
        waste.
    4.   Treatment: Processing the waste at the site to either remove the contaminants from
        soil, sediment or ground water or bind contaminants into soil or sediment.
          Thermal Treatment: Using heat to render contaminants harmless by increasing
        their volatility; immobilizing them; or destroying them through burning,
        decomposition or detonation.
        b.  Solidification: Physically binding or enclosing contaminants within a solid mass
        like concrete.
        c- Stabilization:   Inducing chemical reactions between a stabilizing agent (such
        as lime, Portland cement, fly ash or kiln dust) and the contaminants to reduce their
        mobility.
        d.  Bioremediation:  Breaking down toxic contaminants by using natural
        microorganisms.
        e.  Phytoremediation:  Using plants to help remediate sites. The plants draw up
        soil and water pollutants through their root systems and either immobilize the
        contamination or metabolize it.
        f. Chemical Transformation: Detoxifying contaminants by transforming their
        chemical structure.
        g.  Natural Attenuation: Using natural biotransformation processes such as dilution,
        dispersion, volatilization, biodegradation, adsorption and chemical reactions to
        reduce contaminant concentrations over time to acceptable levels.

-------
Reusing  Superfund  Sites
                                                                                                     Tools for  Redevelopment
      Aerial photograph of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo Rive
      area. Source: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
       Construction of soccer fields at the Avte
       Source: EPA
Fibers site in Front Royal, Virginia.
   EPA can help communities in a number of ways as they consider reuse of Superfund sites. Through SRI,
   EPA continues to provide new, more effective tools for redevelopment.  Communities can select the
tools that fit their needs and can tailor them to the characteristics of individual Superfund sites. Following
are examples of those tools and how communities have used them.

Enhanced Stakeholder  Process

Planning for the revitalization of environmentally impaired properties is ideally a community-based process,
relying on people and partnerships as well as information and analysis. EPA can support communities in
this process by supplying teams of experts to work with them to gain a better understanding of reasonably
anticipated  future land use  to incorporate into remedy selection decisions. Often communities find it
helpful to create community-based Land Use Committees, which guide the projects from the planning
stage through implementation of the redevelopment plan.  With this approach, it is important to provide
training and education for committee members to ensure that the community has the ability to pursue
land revitalization opportunities over the long-term. EPA's expert team includes people with experience in
facilitation, mediation and public outreach that can help communities devise effective land revitalization
strategies, and bring together diverse local interests.

Just such an expert team helped the citizens of Plainwell,  Michigan develop their reuse framework for
the Plainwell Paper Mill property, which  is part of the larger Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo
River Superfund site. This Superfund site includes five disposal areas, five paper mill properties, an 80-mile
stretch of the Kalamazoo River from Morrow Dam to  Lake Michigan, and a three-mile stretch of Portage
Creek.  The five disposal areas are situated on the riverbanks and contain millions of cubic yards of waste
contaminated with  polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). It has been estimated that the river sediments
contain more than 350,000 pounds of PCBs.

Through SRI, EPA supported local citizens in forming a stakeholders group.  The  Mill Committee was
created to represent the community's priorities and perspectives regarding potential future land uses at
the Plainwell Paper Mill portion of the Superfund site.  The City of Plainwell served as the project's sponsor
with support from SRI and EPA Region 5. For over seven months the Mill Committee managed the planning
process. The 31-member committee met three times and hosted a public meeting to share the project's
findings with the larger community.  EPA's expert team organized public outreach efforts; provided research,
analysis and design services; facilitated committee and public meetings; and developed and revised the
project's site reuse framework.  The committee created guidelines for future development proposals as the

-------
City of Plainwell worked with interested parties, such as developers, to return the property to use. EPA will
continue to consult with the committee and with the City of Plainwell as they move forward with the reuse
plan to ensure that the site remedy will remain protective for future users.
                                                                                                                   Reusing  Superfund  Sites
Partnerships
SRI can form partnerships with groups and organizations interested in Superfund site redevelopment,
which can help local communities realize reuse opportunities.

Partnerships with site owners, local businesses, large corporations, state governments and local ofp. ,
are essential to the success of reuse projects. Owners of Superfund sites may have the financial resources
and legal obligation to clean up a site and can set it on the road to reuse.  Local developers may have the
knowledge and financial interest to make certain that a site is reused in a way that is economically viable.
And local officials have an interest in making sure that the  new use fits the needs and desires of their
communities.

Once EPA understands a community's concerns, it may be able to inform the community about potential
partners.  For example, the U.S. Soccer Foundation is interested in building soccer fields around the country
to help promote the sport.  Because many Superfund sites can safely support soccer fields (and plans for
building the fields can be easily incorporated into cleanups), EPA has entered into a partnership with the
U.S. Soccer Foundation. If a community is interested in  reusing all or a portion of a site for soccer fields, EPA
can assist in its contacts with the Foundation.

EPA has also formed a partnership with model airplane enthusiasts. On February 10, 2005, Joseph Beshar,
of the Academy of Model  Aeronautics (AMA),  signed  an  agreement with Michael Cook, the director of
EPA's Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.  The Academy's member clubs can
offer services such  as mowing and maintaining the landscaped surfaces and  fences on the parts of
Superfund sites that the Academy is using,  at no  cost to  EPA  or the local  community. The agreement
between  the Academy and  EPA can link Superfund communities interested in hosting model airplane
activities on their Superfund sites with the expertise and resources of the Academy. This partnership will
benefit communities interested in offering aeromodeling activities and will support the Academy's interest
in promotion, development, education and general advancement of aeromodeling activities. This alliance
between  EPA and the AMA is already creating  new opportunities. In 2005, Rae Fritz and the Northwest
Florida Modelers  Association (an AMA chapter) made  the Fritz Field model airplane park on the capped
northern  portion of the Beulah Landfill Superfund site in Pensacola, Florida, their home for flying  and
regular competitions.
Michael Cook (left), Director of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation,
EPA and Joseph Beshar (right), AMA. Source: EPA
   "You can appreciate that having a place to fly is the
 heartbeat of model aviation.  The Academy is on cloud
            nine that we have this potential."
 -Joseph Beshar, Flying Sites Coordinator, Academy of Model Aeronautics

-------
Reusing  Superfund  Sites
   Case Study	
   Smoothing the Way for Outdoor Fun:
   Arlington, Tennessee
       Arlington Blending &  Packaging was once home to a  pesticide formulation  and
       packaging plant where leaks and spills contaminated the soil, sediment and ground
   water. In 1996, EPA and contractors excavated and treated 41,000 tons of contaminated
   soil. They then backfilled the area with clean soil. Although it was safe, the site remained
   unused due to the disincentive associated with the previous contamination. EPA stepped
   in to help local stakeholders who were interested in finding a new use for the site. In July
   2004, EPA issued a letter to the town of Arlington, detailing the liability statutes that will
   protect the town's interests when they take ownership of the property because of unpaid
   taxes. To further reassure the residents of the site's safety, EPA issued an RfR Determination
   on October 16, 2004, declaring the site ready, the remedy protective, and clarifying what
   requirements had to be followed for the use to remain safe.  Now local stakeholders are
   moving forward with a park that includes a playground, field space, walking and biking
   trails, exercise stations and a basketball court.
        The Arlington Blending & Packaging site in Arlington, Tennessee and newly constructed
        playground. Source: EPA
Ready for Reuse  (RfR) Determinations
Another tool in SRI's  tool chest  is the RfR Determination.   This is an
environmental status report written in plain language that tells how a site can
be used so that it remains safe for people and the environment. EPA issues RfR
Determinations  to help the real estate market, local governments and local
residents understand how a site can be reused and for what purposes.  Often,
RfR Determinations help remove doubts that developers or site owners have
about reusing a former Superfund site, and give stakeholders confidence to
move ahead with reuse. The  2.3-acre Arlington Blending & Packaging site in
Arlington,Tennessee is a good example.
                                                                                    "Without the Ready for Reuse Determination there was no
                                                                                   way that we could have ever convinced ... people that here's
                                                                                    a property that was once a Superfund site, and we're going
                                                                                   to put it to use. It enhanced the aesthetics of the community,
                                                                                    upgraded the property value of surrounding properties and
                                                                                       makes a better experience for the people and children
                                                                                                           in the area."
                                                                                                - Ed Haley, Town of Arlington Superintendent

-------
                                                                                                                    Reusing  Superfund  Sites
Written  Guides
EPA has also developed a series of documents to serve as guides for communities grappling with the issues
involved in reusing Superfund sites. The following guides are available to the public through EPA's Web site
at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/pubs.htm.

Reusing Superfund Sites: Commercial Use Where Waste is Left on Site - This document provides technical
information on how sites with hazardous waste have been safely reused for commercial purposes while
ensuring that the protectiveness of the remedy is maintained.

Reusing Superfund Sites: Recreational Opportunities at Abandoned Mine Lands - This document provides
information about active  and passive recreational  redevelopment opportunities at abandoned mine
lands.

Reusing Superfund Sites: Recreational Use of Land Above Hazardous Waste Containment Areas - This
document provides technical information on how sites with hazardous waste have been safely reused for
recreational purposes while ensuring that the protectiveness of the remedy is maintained.

Reusing Cleaned Up Superfund Sites: Golf Facilities Where Waste is Left on Site - This document provides
information useful for planning, designing and implementing site cleanups that will safely support golf
facilities at a remediated Superfund site. The report describes how redevelopment and remediation efforts
can be coordinated to ensure successful golf facility projects at sites where some or all of the hazardous
wastes will be, or have been, left on site.  For  example, situated on a portion of the Anaconda Smelter
Superfund site is a unique, 21-hole golf course that combines beautiful landscaping with historic mining
artifacts. That's how golfing legend Jack Nicklaus designed the golf course.  Bunkers are made of slag and
golfers play beside old smelting ladles and chip in sight of flues and smelting ovens. This unusual course is
part of the dramatic transformation of the Anaconda Smelter Superfund site in Anaconda, Montana. What
was once a hazardous waste site is now the centerpiece of the town's plans to change itself from a former
mining town to a recreational hot spot.
The Old Works golf faci
Montana.  Source: EPA
the Anaconda Smelter Superfund site, Anaconda,

-------
How You Can Apply  for a  TAG:
EPA may award only one TAG per Superfund site. To make sure
that all eligible groups have an equal opportunity to apply for
the TAG, the application process follows these steps:

Step  1: Your group writes EPA a letter telling of its interest
in a TAG.  This "letter of intent" should include the name of the
Superfund site or sites covered bytheTAG. It should also include
the name, daytime telephone number, and address of your
group's contact person. EPA will send you the TAG Application
Package.

Step  2:  EPA informs the rest of the community that your
group is interested in a TAG. EPA usually notifies the community
by publishing an ad in a local newspaper. The notice also explains
that other groups interested in a TAG may contact your group
and join with you or may submit their own letter of intent.

Step  3: Other interested groups in your community then
have 30 days to get in touch with your group to talk about
working together to submit one  application to EPA. If your
group and other interested groups decide they don't want to
form a coalition, other groups that intend to apply for the TAG
must write EPA a letter of intent within this 30-day period.

Step  4: After the initial 30-day period, interested groups will
have another 30 days to submit  applications.  If EPA receives
more than one application, it will  rank each applicant based
on whether  the group represents the affected community,
the group's plans for using a technical adviser, and the group's
ability and plans to inform other community members about
site-related  information  provided  by  the technical adviser.
EPA is available to provide help  to all groups  preparing TAG
applications.
                     Additional  Help  for  Communities
Technical Assistance Grants - Many Superfund sites present communities with issues that require
expertise in chemistry, engineering, geology, toxicology, ecology, biology and law. Qnce communities
begin to consider issues of site reuse, they may also need expertise in architecture, financing, construction
and public planning. ThroughTechnical Assistance Grants (TAGs)EPA's Superfund program makes it possible
for communities to hire the experts they need to understand the complexities involved in site reuse. ATAG
provides money for activities that help communities participate in decision-making at eligible Superfund
sites. An initial grant of up to $50,000 is available to qualified community groups so they can contract with
independent technical advisors to interpret and help the community understand and interpret technical
information about its site.
                                                         Hudson River PCBs site in New York where the group Scenic Hudson, Inc. used TAG funds to keep the community in Ft. Edward
                                                         informed through newsletters and a Web site about the river cleanup. Source: EPA

-------
                                                                                                                   Reusing  Superfund  Sites
Technical Outreach  Services for Communities - In addition to Technical Assistance Grants,
EPA sponsors theTechnical Outreach Services for Communities (TOSC) program to help communities cope
with hazardous substance issues. TOSC is a no-cost, non-advocacy program run by EPA's five university-
based Hazardous Substance Research Centers.  Because of funding limitations, TOSC may not be available
to every community.
The citizens of Hagerstown, Maryland relied heavily on theTOSC program during the reuse planning process
for the Central Chemical Superfund site. TheTOSC program provided a public health expert who attended
reuse planning meetings and answered citizens'questions about site safety. The health expert helped find
information on site contamination and translated site data to address health and safety concerns.

There are important factors that shape the selection process in favor of a particular community.  These
include:
        •  hazardous or toxic pollution, in the early stages of recognition;
        •  site nomination for TOSC by EPA (most often through the site's Community Involvement
          Coordinator), the state, a  potentially responsible party (PRP), or another party;
        •  request for TOSC assistance by a citizens group;
        •  public interest issues, special circumstances or political  concerns (such as environmental
         justice issues, human health protection, or environmental research);
        •  multiple sources of request forTOSC assistance;
        •  degree of community organization; and
        •  presence of, or willingness to form, a community group to work on this issue.

Community Advisory Groups - One way EPA helps communities develop partnerships for reuse
is by supporting the formation of Community Advisory Groups (CAGs). CAGs are committees made  up
of citizens with diverse interests that provide a public forum for  discussing community concerns about
Superfund sites, including how the community wants to reuse a site.

Liability  Tools -  Sometimes real estate firms are afraid to develop a Superfund site because of the
possibility that the firm could be found liable for the costs of cleanup - even for conditions that existed
before anyone at the firm  became involved with the site. Prior to the passage of the Small Business Liability
Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act in  2002, EPA used comfort letters and prospective purchaser
agreements (PPAs) to clarify liability issues and assure purchasers of former Superfund sites that EPA would
not sue them for existing contamination. Liability provisions in the 2002 Brownfields law have supplanted
PPAs and comfort letters by providing an exemption for qualified"bona fide prospective purchasers."Under
the 2002 Brownfields law, bona fide prospective purchasers are those who purchase property knowing
that contamination is present, but who create significant benefits (such as jobs or removing blight). These
landowners will not be held responsible for pre-existing contamination.
Hagerstown, Maryland Reuse Planning Meeting. Source: EPA
   bona fide prospective purchasers:  those
   property knowing that contamination is
   create significant benefits
 who   purchase
present, but who

-------
 Reusing  Superfund  Sites
                                                                              A  Realistic  Look  at the  Reuse Process
Sharon Steel in the early 1900s. Source: U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service/Utah State Historical Society
Sharon Steel as it is today, ready for redevelopment. Source: EPA
 "Transforming a Superfund site from an eyesore to a point of community pride can be a complex and
 I  lengthy process.  It sometimes takes many years for revitalization efforts to be fully realized.  That
certainly has been the case for the Sharon Steel Superfund site in Midvale, Utah.

For 65 years, the Sharon Steel site was home to smelting and  mining activities that ultimately left behind
10 million cubicyards of mining waste. Wind and rain spread dust from the mining waste over a 571-acre
area, contaminating homes and businesses throughout Midvale with lead, arsenic and cadmium. Runoff
from the waste heaps also polluted wetlands, ground water and the nearby Jordan River. The site was so
large that when EPA began considering cleanup, it divided the site into two distinct areas or "operable
units" (OUs). Cleanup of the site took 20 years and was fraught with difficulty and delay. Intergovernmental
disputes over cleanup decisions caused part of the delay. State and federal engineers designed a remedy
that called for capping the site with a plastic membrane and  one and a half feet of soil.  Although that
remedy made the site safe, it was not a good solution from Midvale's perspective because it severely limited
the City's reuse options.  Redevelopment of Sharon Steel was crucial to the City's future. Development
requires utilities such as sewer and water and in Utah, sewer and water lines must be buried approximately
6 feet deep to avoid freezing. The  proposed  one-and-a-half-foot cap was simply not deep enough to
accommodate the utilities.  EPA moved ahead with its proposed remedy despite the City's objections.
Because of this and other disagreements, relations among the regulatory agencies and the community
were complicated and sometimes strained. The City of Midvale is home to a second large Superfund site,
Midvale Slag, so citizens were already weary of dealing with complicated cleanup processes.

Finally, in 1999, the $31.5 million cleanup was complete,  and the Sharon Steel site was ready to start
anew.  Because Sharon Steel and Midvale Slag are on the only developable land left in the city, citizens
and public officials had a strong incentive to push forward with redevelopment on the Sharon  Steel
property. Nevertheless, the 260-acreOUI remained vacant year after year. In an effort to encourage reuse,
EPA issued "clean letters," saying that the cleanup was successful and the site was no longer hazardous.
Unfortunately, those letters were not enough to change attitudes about reuse. The skepticism and stigma
sometimes associated  with Superfund sites were real  obstacles to redevelopment  at Sharon Steel, as
were misunderstandings  about the  cleanup levels, a  lack of public outreach and public education, and
the physical limitations of the remedy.  In fact, misinformation  about the state of remediation among
bankers, lawyers and citizens led to declining property values at areas near  the site and reinforced the
stigma. After dealing with a series of interested developers, the City realized that in order to move any
development forward a solution to the problem of utilities and the cost of infrastructure was required. In

-------
                                                                                                                  Reusing  Superfund  Sites
2003 Midvale City began pursuing changes in Utah state law that would allow the investment of specialized
tax increment financing to improve the site so reuse would be possible. Eventually, working with a new
residential developer, the City recreated a Redevelopment Area on the Sharon Steel site to pay for the $34
million in additional soil required to allow installation of utilities. The $34 million reimbursement is part of
a $44 million incentive package Midvale City put together to make a new mixed use development on the
Sharon Steel site financially feasible. In 2004, EPA issued an RfR Determination that explained in detail why
the site was ready for reuse and determined that the site can support a mix of uses such as commercial and
residential.  In the same year, a Site Modification Plan for Redevelopment was issued, paving the way for a
positive future at Sharon Steel.  Now that redevelopment is becoming a reality, the relationship between
Midvale officials and EPA has improved. Jordan Bluffs, Inc. bought the Sharon Steel site in January 2004 and
is planning to redevelop it with  a mix of uses, including a 2,500-unit residential  development.

As the story of Sharon Steel illustrates, the process leading to reuse of a Superfund  site can sometimes
be arduous and contentious. Another example is the H.O.D. Landfill site  in Antioch, Illinois, where the
road toward reuse has also been long and rocky,  but where citizens are now successfully turning the
former landfill into a multi-use recreational and  educational area. Bill Ahlers, who was heavily involved in
developing  reuse plans for the site, described his experience this way: "You need to look at the big picture
- the long-term benefits - and be patient and recognize that it's going to be a slower process than you are
probably used to, but the benefits are there at the end."

Other communities have  highlighted  their sites'history by installing plaques that tell the stories of the
sites. Still other communities have  chosen to focus on remediation education and have  discovered ways
to keep the community informed about the site's remediation. This technique offers the community a
sense of ownership in the process and helps to remove any stigma associated with the site.  In Antioch,
Illinois, at the H.O.D. Landfill, the community even put the remediation infrastructure to good use; part of
the redevelopment plan is to place  benches atop wellheads.

Sometimes  sites can be reused  in phases if one area is ready for reuse but others are not. At the 256-acre
Munisport Landfill  site  in  North Miami, Florida, an estimated 6 million cubic yards of solid  waste were
dumped in  an unsafe landfill. Rainfall percolating through the solid waste caused the release of elevated
levels of ammonia into the underlying ground water and adjacent surface water. EPA decided to segment
the  remedy's design and  construction process into four phases. As EPA completes  each phase of the
remedy, the community will begin implementing the reuse plan for that part of the site. Gradually, the
Munisport Landfill will be transformed into a mixed-use development with  approximately 100,000 square
feet of commercial office and retail space, 2,800 to 5,000 residential units, a park and recreation facilities,
and a hotel.
          Some Considerations for
          Weighing Reuse  Options

       1.  Size of the site
       2.  Populations close to the site
       3.  Community's needs and desires
       4.  Transportation corridors
       5.  Land uses and conditions around the site
       6.  Site contamination and cleanup status, based on
          EPA and state agency reports
       7.  Local regulatory frameworks, including zoning
          and comprehensive planning
       8.  Potential partnerships and resources
"Wellhead seat bench design at H.O.D. Landfill. Source: EPA

-------
Reusing  Superfund  Sites
   Case Study  	
   Honoring Heritage: California Gulch, Leadville, Colorado
A       little more than a century ago, Leadville, Colorado was the biggest city between San Francisco and St. Louis. With an elevation of 10,162 feet, it is still the highest
       incorporated town in the United States. After gold was discovered in 1859 along California Gulch, thousands of prospectors flocked to the Leadville mining district
   to seek their fortunes in gold, silver, copper and other metals. Leadville got its name from the rich silver-lead ores that had to be thrown out of mines by hand to get to
   the gold. With its rich, accessible deposits, the  Leadville mining district produced great wealth, including the famous Guggenheim fortune.

   Between 1859 and 1986, an estimated  26  million tons of ore were mined from the 16.5 square-mile Leadville
   district,  but  eventually the industry's fortunes began to fade.  Though the  community had weathered the
   capricious cycles of a mining economy for decades, by the mid-1980s it was clear that mining in the Leadville
   district was coming to an end. Leadville gradually lost half of its population and was faced with the reality that
   140 years of mining had taken a heavy toll on the surrounding environment.

   More than 2,000 mining waste piles dotted  the landscape of the Leadville mining district and covered about 627
   acres. The tailings, slag and dust from these dumps  leached metals into the Arkansas River and  its tributaries.
   Acid drainage in the mine tunnels and runoff from heavy rains caused an estimated 115,000 cubic yards of mine
   tailings to wash into the flood plain of the Arkansas River. The highly acidic mine drainage destroyed vegetation
   and wildlife habitat in the Arkansas River and threatened livestock, recreation, irrigation and public drinking water
   farther downstream. Lead in the soil and water became major health concerns, especially for young children.

   In September 1983, EPA added California Gulch to the National Priorities List of Superfund sites. In 1988, EPA began
   remediation to minimize the effects of this mine drainage and launched removal actions to consolidate, contain
   and control more than 350,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils, sediments and mine-processing wastes.

   A survey in the mid-1990s showed that community residents wanted to reuse part of the Superfund site as a
   multi-purpose trail that would highlight Leadville's history as a mining center. Through creative  planning and
   design, EPA was able to integrate the chosen  reuse strategy with the site remedy.  EPA used the trail as  a way
   to consolidate and cap the contamination along the old transportation corridor. The ultimate design left some
   contaminated soil in place, but capped  it to prevent any exposure, and shaped it into a platform with six inches
   of gravel and three inches of asphalt. Plaques that describe the  area's mining  history line the trail. The Mineral
   Belt Trail  was dedicated in 2000  and two years later the National Park Service recognized it officially as part of
   the National Recreational Trail system. Community residents can  now walk, bike and cross-country ski along the
   trail. Area school children take field trips to the  trail where they can read the plaques and learn about the region's
   mining heritage.
Trail at California Gulch. Source: EPA

-------
                                                                                                               Reusing  Superfund  Sites
                                                              	  Case Study
                                                               Recycling  at a Superfund Site: Trans Circuits, Lake Park, Florida
    At the one-acre Trans Circuits Superfund site in Lake Park, Florida, an innovative recycling business is transforming discarded post-consumer materials like plastic
    bottles into clothing. At the same time, the business's operations represent the recycling  of the site's acreage, which restored a former hazardous waste site to
successful use. Since September 2001, Direct Access International has been creating and marketing 100% recycled-content clothing, tote-sport bags, accessories and
safety products made from scraps of denim, newsprint, rubber, plastics and even  retired dollar bills. The company's clients include local, state and federal recycling
programs; government agencies; and corporations; including EPA, Ford Motor Company, General Motors and PepsiCo Inc. Located in a commercial and industrial area in
southern Florida about seven miles north of West Palm Beach, the Trans Circuits Superfund site is partially asphalt-paved and includes one building, the 21,000-square-
foot facility leased by Direct Access International. Between 1978 and 1988, theTrans Circuits Superfund site was the location of an electronic circuit board manufacturing
facility. The facility disposed of liquid waste on site that resulted in the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to the soil and ground water. Today, Direct Access
International's warehousing, fabric cutting, screen printing, sewing and shipping operations employ 35 people at the site.

-------
Reusing Superfund Sites
                                                                                                                              Reuse  Types
 Reuse Type
 Agricultural
 Commercial
 Ecological
 Public
 Service
 Recreational
 Residential
 Mixed use
Examples of Sites Returned to Reuse
Poer Farm in Indiana - 7.1 acres reused as hay crop for livestock
feed
Silver Mountain Mine in Washington - 5 acres for grazing land
Hellertown Manufacturing Co. in Pennsylvania - 9 acres for a small
manufacturer of prefabricated buildings
Cannon Engineering Corp. in Massachusetts - 6 acres for a propane
distribution business
Wheeling Disposal Service Co., Inc., Landfill in Missouri - 200 acres
fora wildlife reserve
Cherokee County in  Kansas - 110  square  miles for a  wildlife
enhancement area
Syosset Landfill in New York - part of 33 acres is now in municipal
use for parking, equipment storage and material storage
New Castle Spill in Delaware - 6 acres for new headquarters for the
New Castle Department of Public Works
Lexington County Landfill in South Carolina - Golf driving range
on 45 acres
French, Ltd. in Texas - 23 acres of restored marshland for walking,
bird-watching and fishing
Ralph Trucking Co. in California - 23 acres of residential homes
Toftdahl Drums in Washington - 15 acres of residential homes
East Helena in Montana - 3 acres for a neighborhood park; a baseball
field on a treated and capped area; 140 acres for agriculture; a school
on a 20-acre parcel; some wetlands redevelopment;  additional 30
acres will be used for mixed commercial and residential purposes
Petersen Sand and Gravel in Illinois - 115-acre lake; 19,000 square-
foot visitor center; recreation trails; a picnic/event pavilion; preserved
and restored habitat; and swimming, boating and fishing areas
   Superfund sites being reused often have multiple purposes and benefits for site
   owners, community members and others. At the time of publication, there were
more than 550 Superfund sites returned to, or planned for, productive  uses.  The
kinds of reuse that Superfund sites can support are as varied as the communities that
design them. There is no one-size-fits all formula for site redevelopment.  Generally,
however, reuse falls into one of seven broad categories: commercial, industrial,
ecological, recreational,  public service, residential or agricultural purposes. Often
more than one type of reuse occurs at a single site.
                                                                                     117





x — •




1



,



-
108









s
This graph shows the distribution of the Superfund sites returned
to use among the seven types of reuse.
68



/ 	 1

n 5e




s
50


> 	

-7
40
n *
LT1
H ^^ _L^
                                                                                Commercial    Industrial    Recreational    Ecological    Residential    Public Service   Agricultural

-------
  Reuse  Impacts on Communities
                                                                                                                Reusing  Superfund Sites
   EPA's primary objective in cleaning up hazardous waste sites is protecting people and the environment
   from harm, but cleaning up properties has also, in many cases, provided a catalystfor reuse. The productive
reuse of formerly contaminated properties can have significant, positive economic, environmental and
social impacts on local communities. More than  244,000 acres of land are in reuse or ready for reuse at
Superfund sites. This reuse has resulted in nearly 80,000 on-site jobs with $2.7 billion in annual income so
far.

For roughly fifteen  years, a majority of the developable commercial and industrial land outside Boston
at the 245-acre Industri-Plex Superfund site in Woburn, Massachusetts, stood idle due to soil and ground
water contamination. The remedy at the Industri-Plex site primarily consisted  of capping 110 acres of soils
and sediments, implementing a ground water treatment system, and establishing institutional controls to
protect the  remedy. Today, thanks to successful collaboration between U.S.  EPA, potentially responsible
parties, the  custodial trust (development advocate established under the remedy settlement), state and
local  governments, the local community, and private developers, this land  is being reused.  The site is
now home to the Anderson Regional Transportation Center, a new Interstate 93 interchange, and many
businesses, including a Target store and a Marriott luxury hotel. Seventy-five acres of the site are designated
as open space and wetlands. About 750 on-site jobs created more than $19 million in  income in 2003.
Property values increased by almost $82 million on the site and property values within a half-mile of the
site increased by $160 million from 1992 to 2003. The towns ofWoburn, Reading  and Wilmington have
collected  $4.4 million more in  tax revenue since  redevelopment of the site. Redevelopment improved
regional public transportation and increased the protectiveness of the capping  remedy. The redevelopment
at Industri-Plex has transformed the site from a blight on the community to a  symbol of reuse success.

Back at the Home Depot on the old Tinkham Garage site, store employees are helping local residents spruce
up their homes and improve their quality of life. Not only does the retail plaza on the former Superfund site
contribute jobs but, because of the new infrastructure, businesses are springing up on land adjacent to the
site and are  bringing even more jobs. Reggie Ronzello believes that redevelopment has had a tremendous
economic impact not only on the town of Londonderry, but on the surrounding  communities as well.
Jack Dowd,  the chairman of the town council in the neighboring town of Derry, agrees. "The project was
a tremendous success and had a regional impact," he says. The retail plaza has brought at least 700 jobs to
the area, but the benefits don't stop there. As Ronzello put it, Superfund reuse can  be a "win-win-win." All
parties involved can benefit when a Superfund site goes from abandonment to reuse. Not only does reuse
protect human  health and the environment, it also allows communities to increase their tax base, provide
Target at the Industri-Plex Superfund site. Source: EPA
 "The transformation of this 245-acre site has restored
     Woburn's pride, hope and economic future."
           - Robert Dever, Mayor of Woburn, Massachusetts

-------
Reusing Superfund  Sites
 Contacts and Sources of Information on Superfund Reuse

 Superfund Redevelopment Web site:
 http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/index.html
 Melissa Friedland, National Program Manager for Superfund Redevelopment, reuse.info@epa.gov

 Superfund Redevelopment Publications:
 http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/tools/reusehowto.html

 Abandoned Mine Lands Revitalization and Reuse:
 http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/aml/revital/index.htm

 Tools and Resources:
 http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/tools/index.html

 Superfund Community Involvement with Links to TOSC and TAG Information:
 http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/tools/communitypartnerships.html

 Regional Contacts:
 http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/contact/redevelopment.html

 Phone Numbers:
 National Response Center Hotline
 Receives reports of oil and hazardous chemical, biological and radiological releases. Phone: (800) 424-8802
 or (202) 267-2675,24 hours/day, 7 days/week.

 RCRA/UST, Superfund, and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know (EPCRA) Hotline
 Answers  your questions and provides useful documents about the Resource Conservation and Recovery
 Act (RCRA), Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), and the Superfund program. Phone: (703) 412-9810, (800)
 424-9346, TDD (800) 553-7672,9:00 am-6:00 pm Eastern, Monday-Friday, closed on federal holidays.

 Environmental Justice Hotline
 Provides  assistance and information about equal protection from environmental hazards for people of all
 races, cultures and incomes. Phone: (800) 962-6215,8:30 am-5:30 pm Eastern, Monday-Friday

-------