METHOD 556.1
DETERMINATION OF CARBONYL COMPOUNDS IN
DRINKING WATER BY FAST GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Revision 1.0
September 1999
J.W. Munch, US EPA Office of Research and Development, NERL
DJ. Munch, US EPA, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
S.D. Winslow, S.C. Wendelken, B.V. Pepich, ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
Method 556, Revision 1.0 (1998)
S.C. Wendelken and B.V. Pepich (IT Corporation)
DJ. Munch, US EPA, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
Method 556.1, Revision 1.0 (1999)
NATIONAL EXPOSURE RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268
-------
METHOD 556.1
DETERMINATION OF CARBONYL COMPOUNDS IN DRINKING WATER BY FAST
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
1. SCOPE AND APPLICATION
1.1 This is a fast gas chromatographic method optimized for the determination of
selected carbonyl compounds in finished drinking water and raw source water. The
analytes applicable to this method are derivatized to their corresponding
pentafluorobenzyl oximes. The oxime derivatives are then extracted from the water
with hexane. The hexane extracts are analyzed by fast gas chromatography with
electron capture detection (FGC-ECD). Fast GC uses a small diameter capillary
column (< 100 |j,m i.d.), hydrogen carrier gas and a fast oven ramp rate to
dramatically decrease analysis time. Accuracy, precision, and method detection
limit (MDL) data have been generated for the following compounds:
Chemical Abstract Services
Analyte Registry Number
Formaldehyde 50-00-0
Acetaldehyde 75-07-0
Propanal 123-38-6
Butanal 123-72-8
Pentanal 110-62-3
Hexanal 66-25-1
Heptanal 111-71-7
Octanal 124-13-0
Nonanal 124-19-6
Decanal 112-31-2
Cyclohexanone 108-94-1
Benzaldehyde 100-52-7
Glyoxal (ethanedial) 107-22-2
Methyl glyoxal (2-oxopropanal or pyruvic aldehyde) 78-98-8
1.2 This method applies to the determination of target analytes over the concentration
ranges typically found in drinking water. Analyte retention times are in Section 17,
Tables 1 and 2. Other method performance data are presented in Section 17, Tables
3-7. Experimentally determined method detection limits (MDLs) for the above
listed analytes are provided in Section 17, Table 4. The MDL is defined as the
statistically calculated minimum amount that can be measured with 99% confidence
that the reported value is greater than zero.(1'2) However, it should be noted that
background levels of some method analytes (usually formaldehyde and
acetaldehyde) are problematic. The minimum reporting level (MRL) for method
-------
analytes, for each analyst/laboratory that uses this method, will depend on their
ability to control background levels (Section 4).
1.3 This method is restricted to use by or under the supervision of analysts skilled in
liquid-liquid extractions, derivatization procedures and the use of GC and
interpretation of gas chromatograms. The analyst should be thoroughly familiar with
the practice of fast GC before significantly modifying the conditions in Table 1.
Each analyst must demonstrate the ability to generate acceptable results with this
method, using the procedures described in Section 9.
2. SUMMARY OF METHOD
2.1 A 20 mL volume of water sample is adjusted to pH 4 with potassium hydrogen
phthalate (KHP) and the analytes are derivatized at 35 °C for 2 hr with 15 mg of O-
(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)-hydroxylamine (PFBHA) reagent. The oxime
derivatives are extracted from the water with 4 mL hexane. The extract is processed
through an acidic wash step, and then analyzed by FGC-ECD. The target analytes
are identified and quantified by comparison to a procedural standard (Section 3.9).
Two chromatographic peaks will be observed for many of the target analytes. Both
(E) and (Z) isomers are formed for carbonyl compounds that are asymmetrical, and
that are not sterically hindered. The (E) and (Z) isomers may not be
chromatographically resolved in a few cases. Compounds with two carbonyl groups,
such as glyoxal and methyl glyoxal, can produce even more isomers. See Section
17, Table 1 and Figure 1 for the chromatographic peaks used for analyte
identification.
NOTE: The absolute identity of the (E) and (Z) isomers was not determined during
method development. Other researchers (3A5) have reported the first
eluting peak as (E), and the second peak as (Z). For convenience, this
method will follow this convention. Because more than 2 isomers are
formed for glyoxal and methyl glyoxal, the peaks used for identification
are referred to as "peak 1" and "peak 2."
2.2 All results should be confirmed on a second, dissimilar capillary GC column.
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1 LABORATORY REAGENT BLANK (LRB) -- An aliquot of reagent water or other
blank matrix that is treated exactly as a sample including exposure to all glassware,
equipment, solvents and reagents, sample preservatives, internal standards, and
surrogates that are used with other samples. The LRB is used to determine if
method analytes or other interferences are present in the laboratory environment, the
reagents, or the apparatus.
3.2 FIELD REAGENT BLANK (FRB) - An aliquot of reagent water or other blank
matrix that is placed in a sample container in the laboratory and treated as a sample
-------
in all respects, including shipment to the sampling site, storage, preservation, and all
analytical procedures. The purpose of the FRB is to determine if method analytes or
other interferences are introduced during sample shipping or storage. For this
analysis the FRB should not be opened at the sampling site.
3.3 LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK (LFB) -- An aliquot of reagent water or other
blank matrix to which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the
laboratory. The LFB is analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to
determine whether the methodology is in control, and whether the laboratory is
capable of making accurate and precise measurements.
3.4 LABORATORY FORTIFIED SAMPLE MATRIX (LFM) -- An aliquot of an envi-
ronmental sample to which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the
laboratory. The LFM is analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to
determine whether the sample matrix contributes bias to the analytical results. The
background concentrations of the analytes in the sample matrix must be determined
in a separate aliquot and the measured values in the LFM corrected for background
concentrations.
3.5 STOCK STANDARD SOLUTION (SSS) -- A concentrated solution containing one
or more method analytes prepared in the laboratory using assayed reference materials
or purchased from a reputable commercial source.
3.6 PRIMARY DILUTION STANDARD SOLUTION (PDS) -- A solution of several
analytes prepared in the laboratory from stock standard solutions and diluted as
needed to prepare calibration solutions and other needed analyte solutions.
3.7 CALIBRATION STANDARD (CAL) -- A solution prepared from the primary
dilution standard solution and stock standard solutions and the internal standards and
surrogate analytes. The CAL solutions are used to calibrate the instrument response
with respect to analyte concentration.
3.8 QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE (QCS) -- A solution of method analytes of known
concentrations which is used to fortify an aliquot of LRB or sample matrix. The
QCS is obtained from a source external to the laboratory and different from the
source of calibration standards. It is used to check laboratory performance with
externally prepared test materials.
3.9 PROCEDURAL STANDARD CALIBRATION - A calibration method where
aqueous calibration standards are prepared and processed (e.g. purged, extracted,
and/or derivatized) in exactly the same manner as a sample. All steps in the process
from addition of sampling preservatives through instrumental analyses are included
in the calibration. Using procedural standard calibration compensates for any
inefficiencies in the processing procedure.
-------
3.10 INTERNAL STANDARD (IS) - A pure analyte added to a sample, extract, or
standard solution in known amount(s) and used to measure the relative responses of
other method analytes and surrogates that are components of the same sample or
solution. The internal standard must be an analyte that is not a sample component.
3.11 SURROGATE ANALYTE (SUR) - A pure analyte, which is extremely unlikely to
be found in any sample, and which is added to a sample aliquot in known amount(s)
before extraction or other processing and is measured with the same procedures used
to measure other sample components. The purpose of the SUR is to monitor method
performance with each sample.
3.12 METHOD DETECTION LIMIT (MDL) -- The minimum concentration of an
analyte that can be identified, measured and reported with 99% confidence that the
analyte concentration is greater than zero.
3.13 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA (MSDS) -- Written information provided by vendors
concerning a chemical's toxicity, health hazards, physical properties, fire, and
reactivity data including storage, spill, and handling precautions.
3.14 CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK (CCC) - A calibration standard
containing one or more method analytes, which is analyzed periodically to verify the
accuracy of the existing calibration for those analytes.
3.15 MINIMUM REPORTING LEVEL (MRL) - The minimum concentration of an
analyte that should be reported. This concentration is determined by the background
level of the analyte in the LRBs and the sensitivity of the method to the analyte. The
MRL will be at or near the concentration of the lowest calibration standard.
4. INTERFERENCES
4.1 Method interferences may be caused by contaminants in laboratory air, solvents,
reagents (including reagent water), glassware, sample bottles and caps, and other
sample processing hardware that lead to discrete artifacts and/or elevated baselines
in the chromatograms. All items such as these must be routinely demonstrated to be
free from interferences (less than 1/2 the MRL) under the conditions of the analysis
by analyzing laboratory reagent blanks as described in Section 9.3. Subtracting
blank values from sample results is not permitted.
4.1.1 Before attempting analyses by this method, the analyst must obtain a
source of sufficiently pure reagent water. This water must not contain
target carbonyl compounds or interferences at a concentration greater than
1/2 of the MRL. The most likely interferents are formaldehyde and
acetaldehyde in the reagent water. The most successful techniques for
generating aldehyde free water are exposure to UV light, or distillation
from permanganate.
-------
4.1.2 Commercially available systems for generating reagent grade water have
proved adequate, if a step involving exposure to UV light is included. For
the data presented in this method, a Millipore Elix 3 reverse osmosis
system followed by a Milli-Q TOC Plus polishing unit provided reagent
water with background levels of 1 |ig/L or less for each method analyte.
Other researchers have reported typical blank values of 1-3 |ig/L.(4'5)
4.1.3 Distillation of reagent water from acidified potassium permanganate has
been reported as an effective method of eliminating background levels of
aldehydes.(3) Distill 500 mL of reagent water to which 64 mg potassium
permanganate and 1 mL concentrated sulfuric acid have been added. In
our laboratory, this procedure reduced formaldehyde levels to
approximately 3 |ig/L.
4.1.4 It may be necessary to purchase reagent grade water. If acceptably clean
reagent grade water is purchased, care must also be taken to protect it from
contamination caused by contact with laboratory air.
4.2 Formaldehyde is typically present in laboratory air and smaller amounts of other
aldehydes may also be found. Care should be taken to minimize exposure of
reagents and sample water with laboratory air. Because latex is a potential aldehyde
contaminant source, protective gloves should not contain latex. Nitrile gloves, such
as N-Dex Plus, are acceptable. Bottle caps should be made of polypropylene.
Commonly used phenolic resin caps must be avoided because they can introduce
formaldehyde contamination into samples.
4.3 Reagents must also be free from contamination. Many brands of solvents may
contain trace amounts of carbonyl compounds.
4.4 Glassware must be scrupulously cleaned by detergent washing with hot water, and
rinses with tap water and distilled water. Glassware should then be drained, dried,
and heated in a laboratory oven at 130 °C for several hours before use. Solvent
rinses with methanol or acetonitrile, followed by air drying, may be substituted for
the oven heating. After cleaning, glassware should be stored in a clean environment
to prevent any accumulation of dust or other contaminants.
4.5 Matrix interferences may be caused by contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The extent of matrix interferences will vary considerably from source to
source, depending upon the nature and diversity of the matrix being sampled.
4.6 An interferant that elutes just prior to the acetaldehyde (E) isomer peak on the
primary column is typically observed in chlorinated or chloraminated waters. If this
peak interferes with the integration of the acetaldehyde (E) isomer peak, then
acetaldehyde should be quantified using only the acetaldehyde (Z) isomer, or from
the confirmation column data.
-------
5. SAFETY
5.1 The toxicity or carcinogen!city of each reagent used in this method has not been
precisely defined; however, each chemical compound should be treated as a potential
health hazard. From this viewpoint, exposure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means available. The laboratory is responsible
for maintaining a current awareness file of OSHA regulations regarding the safe
handling of the chemicals specified in this method. A reference file of material
safety data sheets should also be made available to all personnel involved in the
chemical analysis. Additional references to laboratory safety are available.(6"9)
5.2 Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde have been tentatively classified as known or
suspected human or mammalian carcinogens. Glyoxal and methyl glyoxal have been
shown to be mutagenic in in-vitro tests.(3)
5.3 Although hydrogen can be used as a carrier gas safely, the potential for fire or
explosion does exist if the gas system is mishandled. If you are unsure of the safety
guidelines for using hydrogen as a carrier gas, seek advice from your instrument
manufacturer regarding its use.
6. EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES (All specifications are suggested. Brand names and/or
catalog numbers are included for illustration only.)
6.1 SAMPLE CONTAINERS -- Grab Sample Bottle (aqueous samples) -- 30 mL amber
glass, screw cap bottles and caps equipped with PTFE-faced silicon septa. Screw
caps should be polypropylene Typical phenolic resin caps should be avoided due
to the possibility of sample contamination from formaldehyde Prior to use,
wash bottles and septa according to Section 4.4.
6.2 VIALS -- 8 mL or 12 mL vials for the acid wash step (Section 11.1.10), and GC
autosampler vials, both types must be glass with PTFE-faced silicon-lined
polypropylene caps.
6.3 VOLUMETRIC FLASKS — various sizes used for preparation of standards.
6.4 BALANCE — Analytical, capable of accurately weighing to the nearest 0.0001 g.
6.5 WATER BATH or HEATING BLOCK - Capable of maintaining 3 5 ± 2 °C
6.6 GAS CHROMATOGRAPH - Capillary Gas Chromatograph (Hewlett Packard 6890
or equivalent), equipped for fast gas chromatography. Modifications will include a
high pressure (>50 psi) split/splitless injector, fast temperature ramp (30 °C/minute)
oven and a low volume (150 (jL) micro ECD detector. Additionally, a data system
capable of fast sampling (20 points/peak) is required.
6.6.1 Primary Column - 10 m x 0.10 mm J&W DB-5, 0.10 |im film thickness (or
equivalent).
-------
6.6.2 Confirmation Column -- 10 m x 0.10 mm Alltech AT- 1701, 0.10 |im film
thickness (or equivalent)
6.6.3 Straight injection port liners (< 2 mm i.d.) packed with a central 2 cm plug
of silanized glass wool. Hewlett Packard PN 5181-3317 or equivalent.
7. REAGENTS AND STANDARDS
7.1 Reagent grade or better chemicals should be used in all tests. Unless otherwise
indicated, it is intended that all reagents shall conform to the specifications of the
Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society, where such
specifications are available. Other grades may be used, provided it is first
ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently high purity to permit its use without
lessening the accuracy of the determination.
7.2 REAGENT WATER — Reagent water as free as possible from interferences and
contamination is critical to the success of this method. See Section 4.1.
7.3 ACETONITRILE - High purity, demonstrated to be free of analytes and
interferences.
7.4 HEXANE — High purity, demonstrated to be free of analytes and interferences:
B&J Brand, GC2 grade or equivalent.
7.5 POTASSIUM HYDROGEN PHTHALATE (KHP) - ACS Grade or better.
7.6 0-(2,3,5,6-PENTAFLUOROBENZYL)-HYDROXYLAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE
(PFBHA) - 98+%, Aldrich cat. # 19,448-4. (Store in a desiccator - Do not
refrigerate).
7.7 SULFURIC ACID - ACS Grade or better.
7.8 COPPER SULFATE PENTAHYDRATE - ACS Grade or better.
7.9 AMMONIUM CHLORIDE, NH4C1 or AMMONIUM SULF ATE, (NH4)2SO4 - ACS
grade or better.
7.10 SOLUTIONS
7.10.1 PFBHA REAGENT — Prepare a fresh 15 mg/mL solution in reagent water
daily. Prepare an amount appropriate to the number of samples to be
derivatized. One mL of solution is added per sample. For example, if 14
sample vials are being extracted, prepare 15 mL of solution. For a 15 mL
volume of solution, weigh 0.225 grams of PFBHA into a dry 40 mL vial,
add 15 mL water and shake to dissolve.
-------
7.10.2 0.2 N SULFURIC ACID - Add 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid to 900
mL of reagent water.
7.11 STOCK STANDARD SOLUTIONS - When a compound purity is assayed to be
96% or greater, the weight can be used without correction to calculate the
concentration of the stock standard.
7.11.1 INTERNAL STANDARD (IS) - 1,2-DIBROMOPROPANE, 98+%
purity. An alternate compound may be used as the IS at the discretion of
the analyst. If an alternate is selected, an appropriate concentration will
need to be determined.
7.11.1.1 INTERNAL STANDARD STOCK SOLUTION, (10,000 |ig/mL)
— Accurately weigh approximately 0.1 gram to the nearest
O.OOOlg, into a tared 10 mL volumetric flask containing hexane
up to the neck. After determining weight difference, fill to mark
with hexane. Stock solutions can be used for up to 6 months
when stored at -10 °C.
7.11.1.2 INTERNAL STANDARD FORTIFIED EXTRACTION
SOLVENT, 400 |ig/L in hexane — This is the solvent used to
extract the derivatized samples. The internal standard is added to
the solvent prior to performing the extraction. The volume of this
solvent to be prepared should be determined by the sample
workload. The following example illustrates preparation of 1 L
of fortified solvent. If fewer samples are to be analyzed each
month, prepare smaller batches of working solvent. Add 40 jiL of
internal standard stock solution directly to 1 L of hexane in a
volumetric flask. Cap flask and invert three times to ensure
thorough mixing. Transfer to 1 L storage bottle with PTFE-faced
silicon lined cap. This solution can be used up to 4 weeks. As a
check, run a sample of this working solvent on the FGC before
the first extraction of aqueous samples. Have enough working
solvent available to extract all calibration and aqueous samples in
each extraction set. Never use two different batches of working
solvent for one set of extractions.
7.11.2 SURROGATE (SUR) -- 2',4',5' -TRIFLUOROACETOPHENONE
This compound was found to be an appropriate surrogate analyte for these
analyses. However, the chromatograms for this analysis are very crowded,
and all possible matrix interferences cannot be anticipated. An alternate
carbonyl compound may be selected as the surrogate analyte if matrix
interferences or chromatographic problems are encountered. Any
surrogate analyte selected must form an oxime derivative, because one of
its purposes is to monitor the derivatization process. If an alternate
surrogate is selected, its concentration may also be adjusted to meet the
needs of the laboratory.
-------
7.11.2.1 SURROGATE STOCK SOLUTION, 10,000 |ig/mL - Accurately
weigh approximately 0.1 gram SUR to the nearest O.OOOlg, into a
10 mL tared volumetric flask containing room temperature (25 °C)
acetonitrile up to the neck. After determining weight difference,
fill to mark with acetonitrile. Stock solutions can be used for up
to 6 months when stored at -10 °C or less.
7.11.2.2 SURROGATE ADDITIVE SOLUTION, 20 |ig/mL -- Dilute the
surrogate stock solution to 20 |ig/mL in acetonitrile. This
solution can be used up to 3 months when stored at 4 °C or less.
7.11.3 STOCK STANDARD SOLUTION (SSS)
Prepare stock standard solutions for each analyte of interest at a
concentration of 1 to 10 mg/mL. Acetonitrile should be used as the
solvent for all analytes except glyoxal. Glyoxal standards should be
prepared using a volumetric 90:10 acetonitrile:water mixture due to the
limited solubility of glyoxal in pure acetonitrile. Method analytes may be
obtained as neat materials or as ampulized solutions from commercial
suppliers. The stock standard solutions should be stored at -10 °C or less
and protected from light. Standards prepared in this manner were stable
for at least 60 days. Laboratories should use standard QC practices to
determine when their standards need to be replaced.
7.11.3.1 For analytes which are solids in their pure form, prepare stock
standard solutions by accurately weighing approximately 0.1
gram of pure material to the nearest O.OOOlg in a 10 mL
volumetric flask. Dilute to volume with solvent.
7.11.3.2 Stock standard solutions for analytes which are liquid in their
pure form at room temperature can be accurately prepared in the
following manner.
7.11.3.2.1 Place about 9.8 mL of solvent into a 10-mL
volumetric flask. Allow the flask to stand,
unstoppered, for about 10 min to allow solvent
film to evaporate from the inner walls of the
volumetric, and weigh to the nearest 0.0001
gram.
7.11.3.2.2 Use a 100-jiL syringe and immediately add
100 jiL of standard material to the flask by
keeping the syringe needle just above the
surface of the solvent. Be sure the standard
material falls dropwise directly into the
solvent without contacting the inner wall of
the volumetric.
10
-------
7.11.3.2.3 Reweigh, dilute to volume, stopper, then mix
by inverting several times. Calculate the
concentration in milligrams per milliliter from
the net gain in weight.
7.11.4 PRIMARY DILUTION STANDARD (PDS) - The PDS for this method
should include all method analytes of interest. The PDS is prepared by
combining and diluting stock standard solutions with acetonitrile to a
concentration of 100 |ig/mL. Store at -10 °C or less and protect from light.
Standards prepared in this manner were stable for at least 60 days.
Laboratories should use standard QC practices to determine when their
standards need to be replaced. This primary dilution standard is used to
prepare calibration spiking solutions, which are prepared at 5
concentration levels for each analyte, and are used to spike reagent water
to prepare the aqueous calibration standards.
7.11.5 CALIBRATION SPIKING SOLUTIONS -- Five calibration spiking
solutions are prepared, each at a different concentration, and are used to
spike reagent water to prepare the calibration standards. The calibration
spiking solutions are prepared from the PDS. Store the calibration spiking
solutions at -10 °C or less and protect from light. Solutions prepared in
this manner were stable for at least 60 days. Laboratories should use
standard QC practices to determine when solutions need to be replaced.
An example of how the calibration spiking solutions are prepared is given
in the following table. Modifications of this preparation scheme may be
made to meet the needs of the laboratory.
PREPARATION OF CALIBRATION SPIKING SOLUTIONS
Calibration
Level
1
2
3
4
5
PDS
Concentration,
(|ig/mL)
100
100
100
100
100
Volume PDS
Standard,
(jiL)
250
500
1000
1500
2000
Final Volume
Calibration
Spike
Solution, (mL)
5
5
5
5
5
Final
Concentration
Calibration
Spike Solution,
(|ig/mL)
5
10
20
30
40
7.11.6 PROCEDURAL CALIBRATION STANDARDS -- A designated amount
of each calibration spiking solution is spiked into five separate 20 mL
aliquots of reagent water in a 30 mL sample container, to produce
aqueous calibration standards. The reagent water used to make the
calibration standards should contain the preservation reagents described in
11
-------
Section 8.1.2 (ammonium chloride or ammonium sulfate at 500 mg/L and
copper sulfate pentahydrate at 500 mg/L). Aqueous calibration standards
are processed and analyzed according to the procedures in Section 11.
Resulting data are used to generate a calibration curve. An example of the
preparation of aqueous calibration standards is given below. The lowest
concentration calibration standard must be at or below the MRL.
Modifications of this preparation scheme may be made to meet the needs
of the laboratory. Preparing aqueous calibration standards using varying
volumes of one calibration spiking solution is an acceptable alternative to
the example below.
PREPARATION OF PROCEDURAL (AQUEOUS)
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Calibration
Level
1
2
3
4
5
Calibration Spike
Solution
Concentration,
(|ig/mL)
5
10
20
30
40
Volume
Calibration
Spike
Solution,
(ML)
20
20
20
20
20
Final Volume
Calibration
Standard
(mL)
20
20
20
20
20
Final
Concentration
Calibration
Standard
(W?/L)
5
10
20
30
40
8. SAMPLE COLLECTION. PRESERVATION. AND STORAGE
8.1 SAMPLE VIAL PREPARATION
8.1.1 Grab samples must be collected in accordance with conventional sampling
practices (7) using amber glass 30 mL containers with PTFE-lined screw-
caps, or caps with PTFE-faced silicon septa.
8.1.2 Prior to shipment to the field, 15 mg of copper sulfate pentahydrate must
be added to each bottle. This material acts as a biocide to inhibit
bacteriological decay of method analytes. If samples to be collected
contain free chlorine, then 15 mg of ammonium chloride or ammonium
sulfate must also be added to the bottle prior to sample collection. The
ammonium compound will react with the free chlorine to form
monochloramine, and retard the formation of additional carbonyl
compounds. Add these materials as dry solids to the sample bottle. The
stability of these materials in concentrated aqueous solution has not been
verified.
NOTE: Aldehydes have been demonstrated to be extremely susceptible to
microbiological decay. The use of other chlorine reducing agents
12
-------
such as sodium thiosulfate or ascorbic acid, has also been shown
to produce invalid data. Proper sample collection and
preservation is important to obtaining valid data. The data in
Section 17, Table 7 illustrates the importance of proper sample
preservation.
8.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION
8.2.1 Fill sample bottles to just overflowing but take care not to flush out the
sample preservation reagents. The capped sample should be head-space
free.
8.2.2 When sampling from a water tap, remove the aerator so that no air bubbles
will be trapped in the sample. Open the tap, and allow the system to flush
until the water temperature has stabilized (usually about 3-5 minutes).
Collect samples from the flowing system.
8.2.3 When sampling from an open body of water, fill a 1 quart wide-mouth
bottle or 1L beaker with sample from a representative area, and carefully
fill sample bottles from the container.
8.2.4 After collecting the sample, cap carefully to avoid spillage, and agitate by
hand for 1 minute.
8.3 SAMPLE STORAGE/HOLDING TIMES
8.3.1 Samples must be iced or refrigerated at 4 + 2 °C and maintained at these
conditions away from light until extraction. Samples must be extracted
within 7 days of sampling. However, since aldehydes are subject to decay
in stored samples, all samples should be derivatized and extracted as soon
as possible.
NOTE: A white or blue precipitate is likely to occur. This is normal and
does not indicate any problem with sample collection or storage.
8.3.2 Extracts (Section 11.1.11) must be stored at 4 + 2 °C away from light in
glass vials with PTFE-faced silicon-lined caps. Extracts must be analyzed
within 14 days of extraction.
8.4 FIELD REAGENT BLANKS - Processing of a field reagent blank (FRB) is
required along with each sample set. A sample set is composed of the samples
collected from the same general sampling site at approximately the same time. Field
reagent blanks are prepared at the laboratory before sample vials are sent to the field.
At the laboratory, fill a sample container with reagent water (Section 7.2), add
sample preservatives as described in Section 8.1.2, seal and ship to the sampling site
along with the empty sample containers. FRBs should be confirmed to be free (less
than 1/2 the MRL) of all method analytes prior to shipping them to the field. Return
13
-------
the FRB to the laboratory with filled sample bottles. DO NOT OPEN THE FRB
AT THE SAMPLING SITE. If any of the analytes are detected at concentrations
equal to or greater than 1/2 the MRL , then all data for the problem analyte(s) should
be considered invalid for all samples in the shipping batch.
9. QUALITY CONTROL
9.1 Each laboratory that uses this method is required to operate a formal quality control
(QC) program. Minimum QC requirements are initial demonstration of laboratory
capability (which includes calculation of the MDL), analysis of laboratory reagent
blanks, laboratory fortified blanks, field reagent blanks, laboratory fortified sample
matrices, and QC samples. Additional QC practices are encouraged.
9.2 INITIAL DEMONSTRATION OF CAPABILITY (IDC) -- Requirements for the
initial demonstration of laboratory capability are described in the following sections
and summarized in Section 17, Table 8.
9.2.1 Initial demonstration of low system background. (Section 9. 3)
9.2.2 Initial demonstration of precision. Prepare, derivatize, extract, and analyze
4-7 replicate LFBs fortified at 20 ug/L, or other mid-range concentration,
over a period of at least 2 days. Generating the data over a longer period
of time, e.g., 4 or 5 days may produce a more realistic indication of day to
day laboratory performance. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the
results of the replicate analyses must be less than 20%.
9.2.3 Initial demonstration of accuracy. Using the same set of replicate data
generated for Section 9.2.2, calculate average recovery. The average
recovery of the replicate values must be within ± 20% of the true value.
9.2.4 MDL determination(1'2). Replicate analyses for this procedure should be
done over at least 3 days (both the sample derivatization/extraction and the
GC analyses should be done over at least 3 days). Prepare at least 7
replicate LFBs at a concentration estimated to be near the MDL. This
concentration may be estimated by selecting a concentration at 2-5X the
noise level. Analyze the seven replicates through all steps of Section 11.
Calculate the MDL
MDL=St(n.1 1. alpha = 0.99)
where:
Vu-aipha = 0.99)= Student's t value for the 99% confidence level
with n-1 degrees of freedom
n = number of replicates
S = standard deviation of replicate analyses.
14
-------
NOTE: Do not subtract blank values when performing MDL calculations.
9.2.5 Minimum Reporting Level (MRL) — Although an MDL can be calculated
for analytes that commonly occur as background contaminants, the
calculated MDLs should not be used as the MRL for each analyte. Method
analytes that are seen in the background (typically formaldehyde,
acetaldehyde) should be reported as present in field samples, only after
careful evaluation of the background levels. It is recommended that a
MRL be established at the mean LRB concentration + 3o, or three times
the mean LRB concentration, whichever is greater. This value should be
calculated over a period of time, to reflect variability in the blank
measurements. It is recommended that this value be used as a minimum
reporting level in order to avoid reporting false positive results.
9.3 LABORATORY REAGENTS BLANKS (LRB) -- Each time a set of samples is
extracted or reagents are changed, a LRB must be analyzed. If within the retention
time window of any analyte, the LRB produces a peak that would prevent the
determination of that analyte, determine the source of contamination and eliminate
the interference before processing samples. Because background contamination is a
significant problem for several method analytes, it is highly recommended that the
analyst maintain a historical record of LRB data. If target analytes are detected in
the LRB at concentrations equal to or greater than 1/2 the MRL (Section 9.2.5), then
all data for the problem analyte(s) should be considered invalid for all samples in the
extraction batch.
9.4 CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK/LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK --
Since this methodology is based on procedural standard calibration, a LFB and the
calibration check sample (CCC) are prepared and analyzed in the same manner.
Laboratory fortified blank QC requirements are therefore omitted. Calibration
procedure options and the QC acceptance criteria associated with them are fully
described in Section 10.3. Please refer to that section for these criteria.
9.5 INTERNAL STANDARD—The analyst must monitor the IS response peak area of
all injections during each analysis day. A mean IS response is determined from the
five point calibration curve. The IS response for any chromatographic run should not
deviate from this mean IS response by more than 30%. If a deviation greater than
30% occurs with an individual extract, inject a second aliquot of that extract.
9.5.1 If the reinjected aliquot produces an acceptable internal standard response,
report results for that aliquot.
9.5.2 If a deviation of greater than 30% is obtained for the reinjected extract, the
analyst should check the calibration by analyzing the most recently
acceptable calibration standard. If the calibration standard fails the criteria
of Section 10.3, recalibration is in order per Section 10. If the calibration
standard is acceptable, extraction of the sample should be repeated
15
-------
provided the sample is still within the holding time. Otherwise, report
results obtained from the reinjected extract, but annotate as suspect.
9.6 SURROGATE RECOVERY-The surrogate standard is fortified into the aqueous
portion of all calibration standards, samples, FRBs and LRBs. The surrogate is a
means of assessing method performance from derivatization to final
chromatographic measurement.
9.6.1 When surrogate recovery from a sample, blank, or CCC is <70% or
>130%, check (1) calculations to locate possible errors, (2) standard
solutions for degradation, (3) contamination, and (4) instrument
performance. If those steps do not reveal the cause of the problem,
reanalyze the extract.
9.6.2 If the extract reanalysis meets the surrogate recovery criterion, report only
data for the reanalyzed extract.
9.6.3 If the extract reanalysis fails the 70-130% recovery criterion, the analyst
should check the calibration by analyzing the most recently acceptable
calibration standard. If the calibration standard fails the criteria of Section
9.6.1, recalibration is in order per Section 10. If the calibration standard is
acceptable, it may be necessary to extract another aliquot of sample if
sample holding time has not been exceeded. If the sample re-extract also
fails the recovery criterion, report all data for that sample as suspect.
9.7 LABORATORY FORTIFIED SAMPLE MATRIX (LFM)
9.7.1 Within each analysis set, a minimum of one field sample is fortified as a
LFM for every 20 samples analyzed. The LFM is prepared by spiking a
sample with an appropriate amount of the calibration standard. The
concentrations 5, 10, and 20 |ig/L are suggested spiking concentrations.
Select the spiking concentration that is closest to, but greater than the
concentration in the unfortified sample. Use historical data or rotate
through the designated concentrations to select a fortifying concentration.
Selecting a duplicate vial of a sample that has already been analyzed, aids
in the selection of appropriate spiking levels.
9.7.2 Calculate the percent recovery (R) for each analyte, after correcting the
measured concentration, A, from the fortified sample for the background
concentration, B, measured in the unfortified sample, i.e.,
c
where C is the fortified concentration. Compare these values to control limits
appropriate for reagent water data collected in the same fashion.
16
-------
9.7.3 Recoveries may exhibit a matrix dependence. For samples fortified at or
above their native concentration, recoveries should range between 70 -
130%. If the accuracy of any analyte falls outside the designated range,
and the laboratory performance for that analyte is shown to be in control,
the accuracy problem encountered with the fortified sample is judged to be
matrix related, not system related. The result for that analyte in the
unfortified sample is labeled suspect/matrix to inform the data user that the
results are suspect due to matrix effects. Repeated failure to meet the
suggested recovery criteria indicates potential problems with the extraction
procedure and should be investigated.
9.8 FIELD DUPLICATES — Within each analysis batch, a minimum of one field sample
should be analyzed in duplicate. Duplicate sample analyses serve as a check on
sampling and laboratory precision.
9.8.1 Calculate the relative percent difference (RPD) for duplicate
measurements (Ldl and Ld2) as shown below.
RPD= d~d *10Q
9.8.2 Relative percent differences for laboratory duplicates should fall in the
range of ± 30 %. Greater variability may be observed for target analytes
with concentrations near their MRL.
9.9 QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE (QCS) -- At least quarterly, analyze a QCS from
an external source. If measured analyte concentrations are not of acceptable
accuracy (70-130% of the expected value), check the entire analytical procedure to
locate and correct the problem source.
9.10 ASSESSING (Z/E) RATIOS -- In addition to monitoring analyte response from
CCC/LFB, the ratio of the peak areas of each isomer pair should be monitored.
When samples and standards are processed and analyzed by exactly the same
procedure, the ratio of the (Z/E) isomers produced by each method analyte will be
reproducible. This information can be used as a QC check to avoid biased results
caused by an interferant with one isomer of the pair. Calculate and record the ratio of
the peak area of the first eluting isomer (designated (E)) to the second eluting isomer
(designated (Z)). This ratio will be used in data evaluation Section 12.4.
10. CALIBRATION AND STANDARDIZATION
10.1 Demonstration and documentation of acceptable initial calibration is required before
any samples are analyzed, and is required intermittently throughout sample analysis.
After initial calibration is successful, the analyst may choose one of two options for
maintaining on-going calibration. The first option is to verify the initial calibration
17
-------
daily using a minimum of 2 calibration standards. The other option is daily
calibration of the method with all 5 calibration standards. These options are further
described in Section 10.3.
10.2 INITIAL CALIBRATION CURVE
10.2.1 Establish FGC operating parameters equivalent to the suggested
specifications in Section 17, Table 1. The GC system must be calibrated
using the internal standard (IS) technique. Other GC columns or GC
conditions may be used if equivalent or better performance can be
demonstrated (Section 1.3).
10.2.2 Five calibration standards are recommended to calibrate over the range of
approximately 5-40 |ig/L. The lowest level standard will depend upon the
level of blank contamination for each analyte (Section 7.11.6).
10.2.3 Prepare each calibration standard by the procedural standard calibration
method. Method analytes are fortified into reagent water and carried
through the entire extraction and derivatization procedure described in
Section 11.
10.2.4 Inject 1 (jL of each calibration standard extract into the FGC and tabulate
peak area response and concentration for each analyte and the internal
standard. NOTE: The formaldehyde peak will be much larger (for the
same concentration) than the other analyte peaks. The formaldehyde peak
may need to be attenuated on some instruments/data systems to avoid
signal saturation.
10.2.5 (Z/E) ISOMERS — Two isomers, referred to as (E) and (Z), are formed for
most asymmetrical carbonyl compounds derivatized with PFBHA.
Chromatographic resolution is usually obtained with the columns
suggested in Section 6.6 for acetaldehyde, propanal, butanal, pentanal,
hexanal, heptanal, and octanal, (see chromatograms in Section 17, Figure 1
and Figure 2). With dicarbonyl species such as glyoxal and methyl
glyoxal, (E) and (Z) isomerism occurs from oxime formation with both
carbonyl groups, increasing the number of isomers. The demonstration
data included in this method use two distinct isomer peaks each for
glyoxal and methyl glyoxal. Use one of the following methods for both
calibration and quantitation of each method analyte.
(a) Use the sum of the isomer peak areas for each constituent for both
calibration and quantitation.
(b) Use the peak area of each individual isomer to independently
calculate a concentration for each isomer. Then average the amount
of the two isomers to report one value for the analyte.
18
-------
10.2.6 Generate a calibration curve for each analyte by plotting the area ratios
(Aa/AjS) against the concentration ratios (Ca/Cis) of the five calibration
standards where:
Aa is the peak area of the analyte (or analyte isomer pair),
A;s is the peak area of the internal standard,
Ca is the concentration of the analyte, and
Cis is the concentration of the internal standard.
10.2.7 This curve must always be forced through zero and can be defined as
either first or second order. Forcing zero allows for a better estimate of the
background level of method analytes.
10.2.8 A data system is required to collect the chromatographic data, to calculate
relative response factors, and calculate either linear or second order
calibration curves.
10.2.9 VERIFICATION OF CALIBRATION STANDARD MATERIALS --
Analyze a LFB prepared from standard materials from a source other than
those used to prepare the initial calibration curve (Sections 3.8, and 9.9).
Calculate the concentration of this QCS from the calibration curve. The
calculated concentration of the QCS must agree within 70-130% of its true
value. This step verifies the validity of calibration standard materials and
the calibration curve prior to sample analyses.
10.3 OPTIONS FOR ON-GOING CALIBRATION
The time, temperature, pH, and PFBHA concentration will all affect the rate,
efficiency and reproducibility of the derivatization reaction. It is critical that those
parameters be controlled. Calibration frequency will depend upon the laboratory's
ability to control these parameters so that continuing calibration check standard
criteria can be met. Some laboratories may find it more productive to prepare and
analyze a calibration curve with each batch of samples. A batch of samples for this
methodology should not exceed 20 samples, including field samples, FRBs,
laboratory duplicates, and fortified sample matrices.
10.3.1 CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK (CCC) OPTION-The analyst
must periodically verify calibration during the analysis of samples in order
to ensure accuracy of analytical results. Prepare a minimum of one low-
level (suggested concentration 2-5 ug/L) and one mid-level (suggested
concentration 10-30 |ig/L) calibration standard with each batch of samples.
Verify calibration using these two standards, prior to analyzing any of the
sample extracts from the batch. In addition, reanalyze one of these two
standard extracts after every tenth sample extract, and after the last sample
in an analysis batch to ensure instrument stability throughout the analysis
batch. Recovery must be within 70-130% of the true value for the mid-
19
-------
level standard, and within 50-150% of the true value for the low-level
standard.
10.3.2 DAILY CALIBRATION OPTION - The analyst may choose to create a
new calibration curve for each batch of samples by preparing and
analyzing a standard at all five calibration concentrations, with each batch
of samples. If this option is selected, the calibration standard extracts
should be analyzed prior to the analysis of sample extracts. To ensure that
sensitivity and performance of the method has not changed significantly
between sample batches, or changed since the IDC, the following
performance check is required. The response (peak area) of the internal
standard, surrogate and each method analyte in the mid-level standard
(suggested concentration 10-30 |ig/L), must be within 50-150% of the
mean peak area for that analyte in the initial demonstration of precision
replicates (Section 9.2.2). One of the calibration standard extracts must be
reanalyzed after every tenth sample extract, and after the last sample in an
analysis batch to ensure instrument stability throughout the analysis batch.
Recovery must be within 70 to 130% of the true value for mid- and high-
level calibration standards, and within 50-150% of the true value for the
low-level standard (suggested concentration 2-5 |ig/L).
11 PROCEDURE
11.1 SAMPLE EXTRACTION — Once samples have been opened, process the samples
straight through to step 11.1.11. There is no known "safe" stopping point once
sample processing has begun. Samples are derivatized and extracted in the sample
bottle in which they were collected. Transferring the sample to another container
for derivatization and extraction has been shown to cause a loss of method analytes.
11.1.1 Remove the samples from storage and allow them to equilibrate to room
temperature.
11.1.2 Remove 10 mL of sample and discard. Mark the level of the remaining
sample volume on the outside of the bottle, for later sample volume
determination.
11.1.3 Add 200 mg KHP to adjust the sample pH to approximately 4.
11.1.4 Add 20 |iL surrogate solution (Sect 7.11.2.2).
11.1.5 Add 1 mL of freshly prepared PFBHA Reagent as per Section 7.10.1. Cap
and swirl gently to mix.
11.1.6 Place all samples in a constant-temperature water bath set at 35 ± 2 °C for
2 hours. Remove vials and cool to room temperature for 10 minutes.
20
-------
11.1.7 To each vial add approximately 0.05 mL (2 to 4 drops) of concentrated
sulfuric acid. This prevents the extraction of excess reagent, which will
cause chromatographic interferences.
11.1.8 Add 4 mL of hexane that contains the internal standard (Section 7.11.1.2).
11.1.9 Shake manually for 3 minutes. Let stand for approximately 5 minutes to
permit phases to separate.
11.1.10 Draw off hexane layer (top layer) using a clean disposable Pasteur pipette
for each sample into a smaller 8 mL vial containing 3 mL 0.2 N sulfuric
acid. Shake for 30 seconds and let stand for 5 minutes for phase
separation. NOTE: This acid wash step further reduces the reagent and
other interferants from the final extract.
11.1.11 Draw off top hexane layer using another clean, disposable pipette for each
sample and place in two 1.8 mL autosampler vials per sample. Store extra
autosampler vials as a backup extract. Extracts may be stored for up to 14
days at 4 °C.
11.1.12 Sample Volume Determination — Discard remaining water sample and
hexane in each sample bottle. Fill with water to the level indicated by the
mark made in Section 11.1.2. Pour the water into a 25 mL graduated
cylinder and measure the volume to the nearest mL. Record the sample
volume for each sample.
Alternately, if a laboratory has control over the brand and style of the 30
mL sample bottles being used, the exact volume of a number of bottles
from the same manufacturer and lot may be measured, and the average
bottle volume minus 10 mL may be used as the sample volume for all
samples using the same lot of sample bottles. A minimum of 10 % of the
sample bottles obtained from the same manufacturer, from the same lot
should be measured.
11.2 FAST GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY- This method uses fast gas chromatography
(FGC) for the analysis of the hexane extracts. Several important changes from
"conventional GC" must be made to allow for the rapid analysis of the analytes.
First the instrument must be capable of providing a fast temperature ramp
(30°C/minute) oven, a high pressure (>50 psi) split/splitless injector, and a low
volume (150 (jL ) micro BCD. Second, the column diameter, length and film
thickness must all be decreased. Third, the carrier gas must be changed to a highly
diffusive
or "fast" gas such as hydrogen. Although hydrogen can be used safely as a
carrier gas, the potential for fire or explosion does exist if the gas system is
mishandled. If you are unsure of the safety guidelines for using hydrogen as a
carrier gas, seek advice from your instrument manufacturer regarding its use.
Finally, strict attention must be paid to established column installation guidelines
21
-------
with regard to the proper cutting and placement of the capillary columns within the
instrument.
In addition to decreasing the column dimensions and changing the carrier gas,
successful FGC depends on the minimization of extracolumn variance.
Extracolumn variance refers to any source of bandbroadening other than those
which occur within the chromatographic column itself. The major source of
extracolumn variance in a properly designed FGC chromatographic system is the
injector/injection process. The best chromatographic results for the oxime
derivatives have been achieved using glass wool packed small i.d. liners (Section
6.6.3) combined with low split ratios. Although excellent precision and accuracy
have been demonstrated using the listed chromatographic conditions (Section 17,
Table 1.), it possible that the optimum conditions for a specific instrument will need
to be empirically determined by the user.
11.2.1 Analyze the extracts by FGC/ECD. Tables 1 and 2 (Section 17)
summarize recommended FGC operating conditions and retention times
observed using this method. Figure 1 illustrates the performance of the
recommended primary column with the method analytes. Figure 2
illustrates the performance of the recommended confirmation column with
the method analytes. Other GC columns or chromatographic conditions
may be used if the requirements of Section 9 are met.
11.2.2 The width of the retention time window used to make identifications
should be based on measurements of actual retention time variations of
standards over the course of time. Plus or minus three times the standard
deviation of the retention time for a compound can be used to calculate a
suggested window size; however the experience of the analyst should
weigh heavily in the interpretation of chromatograms.
11.2.3 If an analyte peak area exceeds the range of the calibration curve, the
extract may be diluted with the hexane extraction solvent (that contains the
internal standard) and reanalyzed. Incorporate the dilution factor into final
concentration calculations. The analyst must not extrapolate beyond the
calibration range established.
12. DATA ANALYSIS AND CALCULATIONS
12.1 Identify the method analytes in the sample chromatogram by comparing the
retention time of the suspect peak to the retention time of an analyte peak (or isomer
peaks) in a calibration standard or the laboratory fortified blank.
12.2 Calculate the analyte concentrations using the first or second order calibration
curves generated as described in Section 10.
12.3 For any analytes that are found, adjust the calculated concentration to reflect the true
sample volume determined in Section 11.1.12.
22
-------
12.4 Prior to reporting the data, the chromatogram should be reviewed for any incorrect
peak identification or poor integration. If a confirmation column has been used, all
identifications should be verified using the retention time data from that analysis. In
addition, the (Z/E) isomer ratio should be within 50% of the ratio observed in
standards. If the (Z/E) ratio does not meet these criteria, it is likely that an
interferent occurred at the retention time of one of the isomer peaks. In this case,
the amount indicated by the lower of the 2 isomer peaks should be reported. (This
may require that the analyst recalculate the analyte amount using individual isomer
peaks for quantitation.) If one peak of the isomeric pair is missing, the
identification is not confirmed and should not be reported.
12.5 Analyte concentrations are reported in |ig/L.
13. METHOD PERFORMANCE
13.1 Precision and accuracy data are presented in Section 17. Data are presented for
three water matrices: reagent water (Table 3), chlorinated "finished" surface water
(Table 5), chlorinated "finished" ground water (Table 6).
13.2 DERIVATIZATION PARAMETERS - This method is a procedural standard
method that will generate accurate and precise results when used as written. The
time, temperature, pH, and PFBHA concentration will all affect the rate, efficiency
and reproducibility of the derivatization reaction. It is critical that those parameters
be controlled. Calibration frequency will depend upon the laboratory's ability to
control these parameters. Some laboratories may need to prepare and analyze a
calibration curve with each batch of samples. Of all the method analytes, glyoxal,
methyl glyoxal, benzaldehyde, and cyclohexanone are the most difficult to
derivatize. Poor sensitivity for any of these compounds indicates that there may be
a problem with the reaction conditions. Measurements of nonanal, decanal, glyoxal
and methyl glyoxal appear to be less precise than the measurement of other analytes.
13.3 The importance of low background levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde cannot
be overemphasized. Some laboratories or reagent waters may also contain
background amounts of other method analytes. Care must be taken to avoid
reporting false positive results that result from background contamination.
13.4 The importance of proper sample collection and preservation also cannot be
overemphasized. Holding time studies in various matrices showed better than 70%
recovery of all method analytes when samples were collected, preserved, and stored
according to Section 8, and analyzed within 7 days. There were variations in the
recovery of analytes from fortified samples from different matrices. Therefore, it is
strongly recommended that samples be analyzed as soon as possible after collection.
The data in Section 17, Table 7 illustrate the dramatic difference between a
preserved and a non-preserved sample. Although this data was presented as Table 6
23
-------
of Method 556, revision 1.0, it is included to illustrate the importance of proper
sample preservation.
14. POLLUTION PREVENTION
14.1 This method uses a micro-extraction procedure which requires very small quantities
of organic solvents.
14.2 For information about pollution prevention that may be applicable to laboratory
operations, consult "Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste
Reduction" available from the American Chemical Society's Department of
Government Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16th Street N.W., Washington,
D.C., 20036.
15. WASTE MANAGEMENT
15.1 The analytical procedures described in this method generate relatively small
amounts of waste since only small amounts of reagents and solvents are used. The
matrices of concern are finished drinking water or source water. However, the
Agency requires that laboratory waste management practices be conducted
consistent with all applicable rules and regulations, and that laboratories protect the
air, water, and land by minimizing and controlling all releases from fume hoods and
bench operations. Also, compliance is required with any sewage discharge permits
and regulations, particularly the hazardous waste identification rules and land
disposal restrictions. For further information on waste management, consult "The
Waste Management Manual for Laboratory Personnel" also available from the
American Chemical Society at the address in Section 14.2.
16. REFERENCES
1. Glaser, J.A., D.L. Foerst, G.D. McKee, S.A. Quave, and W.L. Budde, "Trace
Analyses for Wastewaters," Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, 15, 1426-1435.
2. Definition and procedure for the determination of the method detection limit. 40
CFRPartl36, Appendix B.
3. Standard Method Number 6252B, "PFBHA Liquid-Liquid Extraction Gas
Chromatographic Method," Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater. pp. 6-77 to 6-83, American Public Health Assoc., Washington, D.C.,
1995.
4. Sclimenti, M.J., S.W. Krasner, W.H. Glaze, and H.S. Weinberg,"Ozone
Disinfection By-Products: Optimization of the PFBHA Derivatization Method for
the Analysis of Aldehydes," In Advances in Water Analysis and Treatment, Proc.
AWWA Water Quality Technology Conf. 1990, pp 477-501.
24
-------
5. Glaze, W.H. and H.S. Weinberg, Identification and Occurrence of Ozonation By-
Products in Drinking Water. American Water Works Assoc. Research Foundation,
Denver, CO., 1993, pp!9-22.
6. "OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General Industry," (29CRF1910).
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 2206, (Revised, Jan. 1976).
7. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part II, Volume 11.01, D3370-82, "Standard
Practice for Sampling Water," American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, PA, 1986.
8. "Carcinogens-Working with Carcinogens," Publication No. 77-206, Department of
Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control,
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta, Georgia, August
1977.
9. "Safety In Academic Chemistry Laboratories," 3rd Edition, American Chemical
Society Publication, Committee on Chemical Safety, Washington, D.C., 1979.
25
-------
17. TABLES. DIAGRAMS. FLOWCHARTS. AND VALIDATION DATA
TABLE 1. CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND RETENTION
TIME DATA FOR THE PRIMARY COLUMN (N=8)
Peak Number
(Figure 1.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Analyte
1,2 dibromopropane (IS)
Formaldehyde
E-Acetaldehyde
Z-Acetaldehyde
E-Propanal
Z-Propanal
E-Butanal
Z-Butanal
E-Pentanal
Z-Pentanal
E-Hexanal
Z-Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
E-Heptanal
Z-Heptanal
2,4,5, trifluoroacetophenone (S)
E-Octanal
Z-Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal (peak 1)
Glyoxal (peak 2)
Methyl Glyoxal (peak 1)
Methyl Glyoxal (peak 2)
Average
Retention
Time (min)
0.673
1.08
1.46
1.50
1.85
1.88
2.28
2.31
2.73
2.76
3.19
3.21
3.54
3.64
3.65
3.97
4.07
4.08
4.19
4.50
4.91
5.23
5.27
5.29
5.41
Standard
Deviation
3.26E-03
1.67E-03
l.OOE-04
7.08E-04
4.51E-04
4.63E-04
5.07E-04
4.86E-04
3.36E-04
3.27E-04
3.18E-04
1.85E-04
4.33E-04
3.47E-04
1.59E-04
3.18E-04
3.25E-04
4.88E-04
2.13E-04
2.97E-04
2.76E-04
5.33E-04
4.91E-04
2.90E-04
2.85E-04
Relative
Standard
Deviation
0.49%
0.15%
0.01%
0.05%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
Primary Column:
DB-5, 10 m x 0.10 mm i.d., 0.10 |j,m film thickness, injector temp. 200 °C, liner 2
mm with a central 2 cm silanized glass wool plug, injection volume 1 |jL, split ratio
30:1, constant head pressure @ 32 psi, detector temp. 300 °C, detector make up flow
20 mL/minute. Temperature program: 70 °C initial, program at 27 °C/minute to 220
°C, ballistic heating to 280 °C for burnout and hold at 280 °C for 0.4 minutes. Data
collection via HP GC Chemstation at a rate of 50 Hz.
Carrier gas: Hydrogen (UHP)
Detector gas: 95:5 Argon:Methane
26
-------
TABLE 2. CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND RETENTION
TIME DATA FOR THE SECONDARY COLUMN (N=8)
Peak Number
(Figure 2.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Analyte
1,2 dibromopropane (IS)
Formaldehyde
E-Acetaldehyde
Z-Acetaldehyde
E-Propanal
Z-Propanal
E-Butanal
Z-Butanal
E-Pentanal
Z-Pentanal
E-Hexanal
Z-Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
E-Heptanal
Z-Heptanal
E-Octanal
Z-Octanal
2,4,5, trifluoroacetophenone (S)
Benzaldehyde
E-Nonanal
Z-Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Average
Retention
Time (min)
0.808
1.29
1.69
1.73
2.07
2.10
2.48
2.52
2.92
2.96
3.37
3.40
3.76
3.80
3.82
4.22
4.23
4.36
4.53
4.62
4.63
5.01
5.57
5.68
Standard
Deviation
1.48E-03
1.75E-03
1.87E-03
1.79E-03
1.79E-03
1.87E-03
1.76E-03
1.85E-03
1.56E-03
1.58E-03
1.59E-03
1.53E-03
1.43E-03
1.46E-03
1.48E-03
1.14E-03
7.25E-04
1.09E-03
1.29E-03
1.28E-03
1.31E-03
1.07E-03
9.91E-04
7.85E-04
Relative
Standard
Deviation
0.18%
0.14%
0.11%
0.10%
0.09%
0.09%
0.07%
0.07%
0.05%
0.05%
0.05%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.03%
0.03%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
Secondary Column:
AT-1701, 10 m x 0.10 mm i.d., 0.10 |j,m film thickness, injector temp. 200 °C, liner
2 mm with a central 2 cm silanized glass wool plug, injection volume 1 (jL, split
ratio 30:1, constant head pressure @ 32 psi, detector temp. 300 °C, detector make up
flow 20 mL/minute. Temperature program: 70 °C initial, program at 27 °C/minute to
220 °C, ballistic heating to 280 °C for burnout and hold at 280 °C for 0.4 minutes.
Data collection via HP GC Chemstation at a rate of 50 Hz.
Carrier gas: Hydrogen (UHP)
Detector gas: 95:5 Argon Methane
27
-------
TABLE 3. PRECISION AND ACCURACY IN REAGENT WATER (N=8)
5 |ug/L Fortification
Analyte
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Fortified
Concentration
(Hg/L)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Average
Concentration
(HR/L)
6.01
4.46
6.61
5.54
5.54
5.55
6.19
6.77
5.22
4.50
5.42
5.47
4.60
4.52
Unfortified
Sample
(HR/L)
0.303
ND
1.46
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.68
ND
ND
0.403
ND
ND
ND
Relative
Standard
Deviation
1.9%
2.5%
2.0%
2.4%
2.9%
4.0%
3.2%
5.0%
5.4%
4.1%
4.6%
5.1%
6.3%
5.7%
Average
Percent
RecoveryT
114%
89%
103%
111%
111%
111%
124%
102%
104%
90%
100%
109%
92%
90%
20 |ug/L Fortification
Analyte
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Fortified
Concentration
(Hg/L)
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Average
Concentration
(HR/L)
20.8
20.7
20.6
20.0
20.2
20.3
20.7
20.8
20.2
19.6
20.3
20.3
19.5
19.3
Unfortified
Sample
(HR/L)
0.303
ND
1.46
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.68
ND
ND
0.403
ND
ND
ND
Relative
Standard
Deviation
2.3%
6.3%
2.4%
2.6%
3.0%
3.2%
2.0%
3.1%
2.2%
2.7%
2.6%
3.2%
4.1%
4.0%
Average
Percent
RecoveryT
102%
104%
96%
100%
101%
101%
104%
95%
101%
98%
100%
101%
98%
97%
t These recovery values were calculated using the equation in Section 9.7.2.
28
-------
TABLE 4. METHOD DETECTION LIMITS IN REAGENT WATER (n = 7)
Analyte
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Fortified
Concentration
(Hg/L)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Primary
Column
MDL (ng/L)
0.09
0.18
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.10
0.19
0.40
0.22
0.19
0.62
0.46
0.39
0.26
Secondary
Column
MDL (ng/L)
0.08
0.12
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.09
0.24
0.84
0.04
0.64
0.35
0.13
0.12
29
-------
TABLE 5. PRECISION AND ACCURACY IN CHLORINATED SURFACE
WATER (N=7)
5 |ug/L Fortification
Analyte
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde*
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Fortified
Concentration
(Hg/L)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Average
Concentration
(WS/L)
8.45
6.53
5.68
5.73
5.43
5.48
6.02
5.64
4.84
4.92
5.25
5.78
7.92
6.42
Unfortified
Sample
(WS/L)
3.40
1.76
0.620
0.390
ND
ND
0.650
0.840
ND
ND
0.250
ND
1.40
0.380
Relative
Standard
Deviation
3.3%
2.7%
2.2%
2.4%
2.6%
2.8%
4.2%
4.1%
6.4%
3.1%
8.5%
8.9%
9.2%
9.2%
Average
Percent
RecoveryT
101%
96%
101%
107%
109%
110%
107%
96%
97%
98%
100%
116%
130%
121%
20 |ug/L Fortification
Analyte
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde*
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Fortified
Concentration
(Hg/L)
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Average
Concentration
(WS/L)
22.6
20.1
20.4
20.1
20.5
20.7
20.5
19.1
18.8
20.4
19.9
20.8
25.9
23.0
Unfortified
Sample
(WS/L)
3.40
1.76
0.620
0.390
ND
ND
0.650
0.840
ND
ND
0.250
ND
1.40
0.380
Relative
Standard
Deviation
1.1%
1.8%
1.3%
1.8%
1.9%
2.2%
2.1%
4.1%
7.7%
2.2%
11.2%
10.5%
6.5%
10.3%
Average
Percent
RecoveryT
96%
91%
99%
99%
103%
103%
99%
91%
94%
102%
98%
104%
122%
113%
*Data for acetaldehyde were taken from the secondary column due to an interference with E-
acetaldehyde.
t These recovery values were calculated using the equation in Section 9.7.2.
30
-------
TABLE 6 . PRECISION AND ACCURACY IN CHLORINATED GROUND
WATER (N=7)
5 |ug/L Fortification
Analyte
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde*
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Fortified
Concentration
(HR/L)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Mean
Concentration
(HR/L)
7.10
6.13
5.56
5.58
5.36
5.15
6.02
5.40
4.90
4.60
5.02
5.29
5.82
4.94
Unfortified
Sample
(HR/L)
2.21
1.13
0.657
0.437
ND
0.120
0.534
0.883
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.471
0.202
Relative
Standard
Deviation
1.3%
3.8%
3.1%
3.5%
3.5%
3.7%
4.7%
7.0%
7.9%
5.3%
8.7%
10.4%
10.9%
10.7%
Average
Percent
RecoveryT
97.8%
101%
98.0%
103%
107%
101%
110%
90.3%
98.0%
92.1%
100%
106%
107%
94.7%
20 |ug/L Fortification
Analyte
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde*
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl Glyoxal
Fortified
Concentration
(Hg/L)
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Mean
Concentration
(WS/L)
21.3
20.2
19.9
20.3
20.2
19.7
20.3
19.7
20.5
19.6
20.5
20.7
22.3
19.9
Unfortified
Sample
(WS/L)
2.21
1.13
0.657
0.437
ND
0.120
0.534
0.883
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.471
0.202
Relative
Standard
Deviation
2.8%
4.0%
3.3%
3.0%
3.7%
5.8%
4.8%
5.5%
6.2%
4.7%
6.6%
8.9%
10.3%
8.9%
Average
Percent
RecoveryT
95%
96%
96%
99%
101%
98%
99%
94%
102%
98%
103%
104%
109%
98%
* Data for acetaldehyde were taken from the secondary column due to an interference with E-
acetaldehyde.
t These recovery values were calculated using the equation in Section 9.7.2.
31
-------
TABLE 7. HOLDING TIME DATA FOR SAMPLES FROM AN
UNTREATED SURFACE WATER SOURCE, FORTIFIED WITH
METHOD ANALYTES AT 20 jug/L, WITH AND WITHOUT
COPPER SULFATE BIOCIDE*
ANALYTE
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Propanal
Butanal
Pentanal
Hexanal
Cyclohexanone
Heptanal
Octanal
Benzaldehyde
Nonanal
Decanal
Glyoxal
Methyl glyoxal
% Recovery without Copper
Sulfate
DayO
104
96
94
92
87
83
94
83
82
94
72
50
103
108
Day 6
144
23
21
20
19
21
99
20
18
83
15
<10
98
68
Day 14
569
21
19
18
16
17
84
16
<10
74
<10
<10
37
<10
Day 21
619
24
22
21
21
22
78
17
11
79
<10
<10
<10
<10
% Recovery with Copper Sulfate
DayO
105
98
98
99
96
93
96
96
99
98
104
107
106
111
Day 6
105
99
98
98
98
97
101
94
96
100
98
101
108
105
Day 14
109
103
103
102
100
100
98
97
96
104
92
93
106
94
Day 21
106
98
96
91
94
92
94
91
93
92
84
82
90
73
* These data were collected and presented as Table 6 of Method 556, revision 1.0.
- All samples were stored headspace free at 4 °C.
- Values at all time points are the mean of 5 replicate analyses. RSDs for replicate analyses of
samples containing copper sulfate were <10%. RSDs for unpreserved samples were higher due to
the degradation process.
32
-------
TABLE 8. INITIAL DEMONSTRATION OF CAPABILITY
REQUIREMENTS
Reference
Section
9.3
Section
9.2.2
Section
9.2.3
Section
9.2.4
Section
9.2.5
Requirement
Initial
Demonstration of
Low System
Background
Initial
Demonstration of
Precision (IDP)
Initial
Demonstration of
Accuracy
Method Detection
Limit (MDL)
Determination
Minimum
Reporting Levels
(MRLs)
Specification and Frequency
Analyze method blank and
determine that all target analytes
are below 1/2 the MRL
prior to performing IDC
Analyze 4-7 replicate LRBs
fortified at 20.0 g/L(ormid
cal.) on at least 2 different days
Calculate average recovery of
IDP replicates
a) select a fortifying level at 2 -
5 x the noise level
b) analyze 7 replicates in
reagent water taken thru all
steps
c) calculate MDL via equation -
do not subtract blank
d) replicate extractions and
analyses must be conducted
over at least 3 days
MRLs should be established for
all analytes during IDC, and be
updated as additional LRB data
is available.
Acceptance Criteria
The LRB concentration
must be < 1/2 of the
intended MRL
RSDmustbe < 20 %
Mean recovery ± 20% of
true value
Establish the MRL for
each analyte, as the LRB
concentration + 3 a or 3
times the mean LRB
concentration, whichever
is greater.
33
-------
TABLE 9. QUALITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS (SUMMARY)
Reference
Section
10.2
Section
9.3
Section
10.3.1
Section
10.3.2
Section
8.4
Section
9.5
Section
9.6
Section
9.7
Requirement
Initial
Calibration
Laboratory
Reagent Blank
(LRB)
Continuing
Calibration
Check (CCC)
Option
Daily
Calibration
Option
Field Reagent
Blanks (FRB)
Internal
Standard (IS)
Surrogate
Standard
(SUR)
Laboratory
Fortified
Sample Matrix
(LFM)
Specification and Frequency
Use internal standard technique to
generate curve with five standards
that span the approximate range
of 5-40 ng/L. First or second
order curves must be forced
through zero. Either sum E/Z
isomer areas or average the
amount of each isomer.
Calculate E/Z ratios for analytes.
Run QCS.
Include LRB with each extraction
batch (up to 20 samples).
Analyze prior to analyzing
samples and determine to be free
of interferences.
Verify initial calibration by
running CCCs prior to analyzing
samples, after 10 samples, and
after the last sample.
Calibrate daily, but verify that
sensitivity and performance have
not changed significantly since
IDC.
1 per shipping batch
1,2-Dibromopropane is added to
all samples, blanks and standards
2', 4', 5' -Trifluoroacetophenone is
added samples, blanks and
standards
Fortify at least one sample per
analysis batch (20 samples or
less) at a concentration close to
that in the native sample.
Acceptance Criteria
QCS must agree within
70-130%.
Lowest concentration
should be near MRL.
All analytes < 1/2 MRL
Recovery for mid-level
CCC must be 70- 130%
of the true value,
recovery for low level
must be 50-150% of the
true value.
Peak areas for IS, SUR,
and method analytes for
mid-level CAL std must
be +/- 50% of the peak
areas obtained for that
CAL std during IDC.
All analytes < 1/2 MRL
IS area counts must be 70
- 130% of the average
initial calibration area
counts
Surrogate recovery must
be 70- 130% of the true
value.
Recoveries not within 70-
130% may indicate
matrix effect
34
-------
Section
9.8
Field
Duplicates
Extract and analyze at least one
duplicate sample with every
analysis batch (20 samples or
less)
Suggested RPD < 30 %
Section
9.9
Quality
Control
Sample (QCS)
Analyze a QCS at least quarterly
from an external/second source.
QCS must agree within
70-130%.
Section
9.10,
Section
10.2.5
and
Section
12.4
E/Z Isomer
Ratio
Agreement
Calculate the E/Z isomer ratio for
target analytes and compare to
E/Z ratio in initial calibration
E/Z ratio in standards,
blanks, and samples must
be within ±50% of E/Z
ratio in initial calibration.
Do not report value if one
isomer is missing.
Section
8.3.1
Sample
Holding Time
Properly preserved samples may
be stored in the dark at 4 °C for 7
days.
Do not report data for
samples that have
exceeded their holding
time, or that have not
been properly preserved
or stored.
Section
8.3.2
Extract
Holding Time
Extracts may be stored in the dark
at 4 °C for 14 days.
Do not report data for
extracts that have
exceeded their holding
time.
35
-------
Hz
2000
1750
1500
1250
1000
750 -
500
250
0
*CN *
T
— — '
IjuJ
L — 1
FIGURE 1.
> Primary Column Chromatogram (DB-5) *«
CO
I
u
•>
t*
CO
OO
^~
1
u
c
L
D
0
^^ T
T
LA *_J
p
T
CN
LAJ
0
~ I
i
^
I
0
^
sf
VJl
CS.CO
o>
00
CD
i
L^
LJ
U
<
<
I — J
^ s
1 1
s
0.5 1 1.5 2
* Peaks have been attenuated
2.5
3.5
4.5
mm
36
-------
FIGURE 2.
Hz
3000
2500
2000 n
1500
1000
500
0
*
T
^ ^
S€
M
*
f
T
vj
;condary Column Chromatogram (AT- 1701)
*
IS
IL
5
1-
CD
••
CO
<
I
J>
0
T— T1
T1
[ |
oo
CM
IL,
^-A^J \__/LJ
in
CD
U
O
T
Wl
0
L^_
T
C
<
M
3 j
i
C
T
C
C
M
M
A.
5
o"
M
I
0
N
0.5 1 2
* Peaks have been attenuated
mm
37
-------
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
38
------- |