MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
STATIONARY SOURCE TESTING OF A  COUNTRY GRAIN  ELEVATOR
                                 at
               The Great Bend Cooperative Association
                            Elevator B
                         Great Bend,  Kansas
                          FINAL REPORT
                          April 29, 1976


                   EPA  Contract No. 68-02-1403
                   MRI  Project No. 3927-C(i9)
                                For
                      National Air Data Branch
             Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
                   Environmental  Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711

                     Attn:  Mr. Thomas F.  Lahre
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE  425
                                             CIT.Y. MISSOURI 64110 •  816 561-0202

-------
             STATIONARY        TESTING OF A COUNTRY
                     The Great      Cooperative Association
                                   Elevator B
                               Great Bend, Kansas
                                       by

                               William H. Maxwell
                           Midwest Research Institute
                                  FINAL
                                 April 29,  1976
                            EPA Contract No. 68-02-1403
                            MRI Project Mo. 3927-0(19)
                                       For
                             national Air  Data Branch
                   Office of  Air Quality Planning and  Standards
                         Environmental protection Agency
                  Research Triangle ?ark»  North Carolina  27711

                           ACtn:  Mr* Thomas F. Lafare
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE  425 VOLnbH BOULLVAHO KANSAS Crr  MiSSOUHl 64110 • 816561-0202

-------
                                PREFACE
          The work reported herein was conducted  by Midwest Research In-
stitute (MRI) under Environmental Protection. Agency (EPA) Contract No.
68-02-1403, Task So* 19.

          The project was tinder the technical  supervision of Mr. Saul C«
Constant* Jr., Head, Environmental Measurements Section  of the Physical
Sciences Division* Mr« William H« Maxwell served  as crew chief and was
assisted by Mr» Thomas Merrifield. The analysis of the samples was done
by Ms® Carol Green® Mr# Thomas Merrifield     responsible for the data
reduction     computer analysis.
                                     iul  C«  Constant, Jr«
                                    Program  Manager
Approved!
L. J»f Shannon, Assistant Director
         Sciences Division

-------

1®        Introduction  • ••••*•*••••...«••*..•»       1

II •       Stannary and Discussion of Results* ••••«»•••••       I

               A«  Soybeans • ******«****»»**»«®.       1
               B*  Wheat * • * • • ».•««»**•••••»*•       4
               C®  Cora* • »•»*.•*••»•*•••*•...       8
               D.  Milo. ......*...«.......*,.       8

III*      Process Description and Operation* «**»««.«»»*      13

               A*  Process Description •»*«*.><>*. .***»      13
               B*  Process Operation .......**......      15

IV.       Location of Sample Points* ..«*...*•*••..•      21

V*        Sampling and Analytical Procedures ••••»*•••»•      21

Appendix A - Results of Analysis - Printout of Computer
  Computations »*•••* .6®^*«»»*»*»»».»s.«»      23

Appendix B - Sample Calculations *»•••••••.••••*•«      52
                                  TiMe

   1      Schematic of Process Operation— Great Bend, Kansas,
            Cooperative Association, Elevator B«*«.9«*.»<.»      14

   2      Schematic of Sampling Site— .Load-Out .*»»...•«*      16

   3      Schematic of Sampling Site— Tunnel Belt* <••**•*•      1?

   4      Schematic of Sampling Site— Bin Vent »««»•••••*      18
                                    iii

-------
                             Losto£Table
TabjLe                             SMS.

   1      Suonaary of Emission Factors and Approximate Catch
            Size Fractions • **•**»*•••»»».•••*«      2

   2      Summary of Particulate Results - Soybeans. •••»*••      3

   3      Approximate Particulate Catch «• Probe-Cyclone Versus
            Filter (Soybeans). .*•.•««»***•••«».•      5

   4      Summary of Particuiate Results - Wheat ••••«••••      6

   5      Approximate Particulate Catch - Probe-Cyclone Versus
            Filter (Wheat) ...........«.*.....*      7

   6      Summary of Particulate Results - Corn* <»*»»*®.»*      9

   7      Approximate Particulate Catch •» Probe-Cyclone Versus
            Filter (Corn). .»*««»*«>««««»«,*.»*„*     10

   8      Sunsaary of Particulate Results - Milo® ••••+•**.     11

   9      Approximate Particulate Catch - Probe-Cyclone Versus
            Filter (Milo). .......*.....**..*..     12

  10      Suntaary of Grain Data Versus Sampling Time »»»»»..     19

  11      Location of Sample Points« «•••••»*•••»••*     22

 A-l      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 1-LOS . • .     24

 A- 2      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 2-LOS ...     25

 A-3      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 3-LOW . * *     26

 A-4      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 4-TB¥ » * »     27

 A-5      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 5-BVW . * »     28

 A-6      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 6-LOW * • •     29

 A-7      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 7-BW « * *     30

 A- 8      Partieulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 8-TBC « * *     31

 A-9      Particulate Data and Calculated Values - Run 9-TBG . * *     32

-------
                                        (Concluded)
Table                              Title




A-10      Partiexilate  Data  and Calculated Values  - Sun  10-TBM •  •  •     33




A- 11      Particulate  Data  and Calculated Values  - Run  11-BVM ...     34




A- 12      Particulate  Data  and Calculated Values  - Sun  12-TBM *  «  *     35




A-13      Particulate  Baisslofi Data  »••*»••**»*»*••*     36




A- 14      Particulate  Emission Data  (Metric  Results)*  *•*.**»     40




A-15      Si^ncaary  of Results*  «»«.**«»»*»**»««*»»     44




A-16      Suamary  of Results—Metric Units «  **»»»*.«»««<>»     48

-------
          This report presents the results of source testing performed dur-
ing the period October 29 to 31, 1975, by Midwest Research Institute (MRI)
on three activities of the Great Bend Cooperative Association, Elevator B»
at Great Bend, Kansas* Testing for particulate emissions was conducted on
the ducts of the dust emission handling system during periods of grain
load-out, bin transfer, and bin loading (venting), all batch or semiconttn-
uous processes*

          All tests were conducted on the ducts prior to the cyclone con-
trol device* Tests were conducted in accordance with the
Vol. 36, Mo, 247, Part 11, December 23, 1971, except as nay be defined
later in this report*

          The following sections of this report present:

          I*  The summary and discussion of results,

          2»  The process description and operation;

          3»  The location of the sampling points; and

          4»  The sampling and analytical procedures*


                 II.          AND DISCUSSION OF
          Table I presents a summary o£ the emission factors and approxi-
mate catch size fractions for all of the tests.
          Table 2 presents a summary of the particulate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the dust-handling system during soy-
bean load-out. Data are given only for the "front half" of the sampling
train as specified in the referenced ^£de£al_^egiiisteir and in the task or-
der* These data are presented as grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/
dscf), milligrams per normal cubic meter (tag/ncra), pounds per hour (lb/hr)»
kilograms per hour (kg/hr)» pounds emissions per ton grain handled (Ib/ton),
aad kilograms missions per metric ton grain handled (kg/Mton)« Computer
printouts of the field data and reductions are found in Appendix A* Sample
calculations are found in Appendix B*

-------
                                                                               TABLE I
Grain
Soybeans
Wheat
Corn
Hllo
Soybeans
Uh«*t
Carn
Hit*
d/
1-U1S
a-ws
4-TBW
5-BTO
6-LOU
I-8W
8-TBC
9-TBC
10-fBM
tl-BVM
12-TBM
Asrewge
Average
A«r.8e
Average
load-Out ~
Approxiaate
___talss|QO_FK£Or_--_^ percent Catch
Jfc£tj»n|£""J I&iiii2=£ > 5 p
3,40 I, JO 96
2,05 1.03 97
O.I? Q.38 91
0,58 0.2* 97
-
-
2,72 1,36 %
0.66 0.34 9?
-
«
Tunnel Eclt'
a»is»ion Factor

; ;
o,3i o.ta
O.W 0,45
0,92 0.48
0,58 0.29
0.68 0.3*
«
0,}7 0.18
0.91 0.4S
11,63 0.3Z
!•/
Appfoieiiaate
F*«c*nt Cuech
__2;_Ui__
-
91
99
99
99
99
*»
97
99
99
Mm Vent
Approximte
___^|»$l^M|«ct2_i<_^ f«rc«nt Catch
J(tZiL£fiaSZ — __£_3_M___
: :
0,02 e»0i 85
0.02 0.01 It
»» TO «
0,0} 0,02 40
M «• »»
0,02 O.W 83
d* ** «8
0.03 0,02 tO
jl/   Includes tunnel belt drop point,  pullky h«od», lag cross b«te,  lag bootii wjd grain tc*t*>
^/   Includes £n?m^t h$lt Ur&p poia£^  putlsy !io@d^» 1^^ crotn b^l£«  *n*t lag hoot*
j^/   Bl?% went ®t^y; gr^ln ^calt  l>in far wMe«£& scasiElarsI hin  for »tl<&«
ji/  ^1,0*  ™ Lead-out
    __-TB_  = Tunnel belt (Bio transfer)
    ^~BV^  ^ Bin ¥«;nt
    _-__S  «= Soybuafts
    _-	U  = Sfceai
    „-	C  «* Corn
    _-__M  => Mllo
n = KHogrwu. «ii«
                              ions  per  tsetrfc Ion
                                                      in handled.

-------
                                                    TABLE  2

                                           OF PARTICULATE          -
P articulate Load 	 Eraission Factor
Run Date
b/
Load-Out
1-LOS October 29
2-LOS October 29
Average
QL^SSsiL


4.691 10,700 340 154 3,40
2,886 6,600 205 93 2.05
3.789 8»6?0 272 124 . 2,72
^^^^^^2,


1.70
1,03
1.36
a/  gr/dscf = Grains  per  dry  standard cubic foot
    «ig/ncm = Mtliigraras per normal  cybtc meter
    Ib/hr = Pounds  per hour
    kg/hr » Kilograms per hour
    ib/ton » Pounds emissions per ton grain handled
    kg/Me on »? Kilograms canissions per metric ton grain handled
Jb/  Includes tunnel belt  drop point,  pulley hoods,  leg cross belt, leg boots, and grain scale.

-------
          Sampling volumes were 31.42 dscf (0*89 tiem.) and 30,72 dscf (0,87
noa)« Values for the percent Isokinetie sampling rate were 98»5     98*6.

          As no combustion was involved, no Orsat analyses were performed
on the     stream* Ambient air values of 20.9X oxygen, 79.11 nitrogen,
and 0.0% carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide were used for the     stream
composition. Percent moisture determinations were obtained using a sling
psychrometer and a psychrometric chart. The value for the volume of water
collected needed for entry into the computer program was back-calculated
from this percent raoisty.re value using the standard equation. The moisture
percentage used was 0,61 for both runs.

          Table 3 presents an approximate breakdown of the weight of mate-
rial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for each run and the approx-
imate size fraction this weight represents* Information obtained from the
Research Appliance Company indicates that the cyclone will retain particles
greater than 5 y, diameter, irrespective of flow rate. From this information,
it appears that approximately 96% of the material collected during the load-
out tests is of size greater than 5 \j,»
B.  jfheat,

          Table 4 presents a suamary of the participate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the dust handling system during wheat
load-out, tunael belt, and bin venting operations* Data are presented as
for soybeans. Computer printouts of the field data and reductions are
found in Appendix A. Sample calculations are found in Appendix B*

          Sampling volumes ranged from 20.41 dscf (0.58 nan) to 47.96 dscf
(1*36 ncrn). Values for the percent isokinetic sampling rate varied from
97.7 to 99.5.

          Again;, no Orsat values were obtained, ambient air composition
values being used as before. Percent moisture values, as obtained for soy-
beans, ranged from 0,8 to 1.3%.

          Table 5 presents an approximate breakdown of the weight of mate-
rial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for eacb run and the approx-
imate size fraction chis weight represents* It appears that approximately
97% of the material collected during the load-out tests* 97% of the material
collected during the bin transfer test, and 837, of the material collected
during the bin vent tests is of size greater than 5 (j,»

-------
                                                  TABLE 3


Run Date
b/
Load-Out
I -LOS October 29
2-LOS October 29
Average

Probe-Cyclone Filter (og)
5 v&l jLil^{


9,149 422
5,584 173
7,366 29?
Probe-Cyclone
Versus Total
(1)


96
97
96
ji/  Size fraction  Information  obtained  from Research Appliance Company,
Jb/  Includes tunnel  belt  drop  point,  pulley hoods,  leg cross belt, leg boots, and
      grain scale.

-------
                                                      c: 4
                                          OF PARTICULATE          -
Run

3 -LOW
S-LQW


Date
b/
Load-Out """
October 29 1,040
October 31 0,849
Average 0*944
Particulate Load
mg£ncn^^ .iizZliSiiu. }$&D;£tii.

2,380 76,6 34*7
1,940 58.3 26*7
2,160 67.7 30.7
Emission Factor


0,766 0.383
0,583 0.292
0.677 0,338
c/
Tunnel Belt "~
4-TBW


5-BVW
7-BVW

October 29 G«S87
Average 0,587
Bin ¥ent ~
October 30 0*469
October 31 0.674
Average 0.572
1,340 43*9 19.9
1,340 43,9 19*9

1,070 1.5 G*7
1,540 2.1 0,9
1,300 1.8 0*8
0*366 0,183
0,366 0.183

0,015 0.008
0.02L 0.011
0.018 0.009
_a/  gr/dscf = Grains per  dry  standard cubic  foot.
    tng/ncm = Milligrams per normal  cubic meter
    Ib/hr = Pounds per hour
    kg/hr = Kilograms per hour
    Lb/ton = Pounds tanissions per ton grain  handled
    kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton  grain handled.
b/  Includes tunnel belt  drop point, pulley  hoods,  leg cross belt,  leg boots,  and grain scale,
c/  Includes tunnel belt  drop point, pulley  hoods,  leg cross belt»  and leg boot.
d/  Bin vent  only (grain scale bin).

-------
                                                 TABLE 5

 Run
Date
                                         Probe-Cyclone
  Filter (mg)
< 5 p.  > 0.3
Probe-Cyclone
Versus Total
     ill
b/
Load-Out
3-LQtf October 29 2,080 74
6-LOW October 31 1,59? " 43
Average i»838 58
, , £/
Tunnel Beit
4-TBW October 29 1,192 39
Average 1,192 39
d/
Bin Vent "~
5-BVW October 30 1,239 222
7-BVH Octobec 31 706 186
Average 972 205
9?
9?
9?
97
97
85
79
83
jaj  Size fraction  information obtained  from  Research  Appliance  Company.
jj/  Includes tunnel belt drop point*  pulley  hoods,  leg  cross  belt*  teg  boots*  and  grain scale.
_e/  Includes tunnel belt drop point,  pulley  hoods,  leg  cross  belt,  and  leg  boot
_d/  Bin vent only  (grain  scale  bin).

-------
C»  Com

          fable  6 presents a summary of the participate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the duct-handling system during com
bin transfer. Data are presented as for soybeans. Computer printouts of
the field data and reductions are found in Appendix A» Sample calculations
aye found in Appendix B*

          Sampling volumes were 28.09 dscf (0*30 ncm) and 29.51 dscf (0.84
ncm}* Values for the percent isokinetic sampling rate were 97*9 and 97*8.

          Ambient air composition -values were again used, and the percent
moisture values  were 1*5 and l»3> for the first and second runs, respec-
tively.

          Table  7 presents the approximate breakdown of the weight of ma-
terial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for each run and the ap-
proximate size fraction this weight represents. It appears that approxi-
mately 99Z of the material collected during the bin transfer tests is of
size greater than 5 p,»
D»  Milo

          Table 3 presents a summary of the particuiate load results and
the calculated emission factors for the dust-handling systes during mile
(grain sorghum) tunnel belt     bin venting operations* Data are presented
as for soybeans• Computer printouts of the field data and reductions are
found in Appendix A« Sample calculations are found in Appendix B*

          Sampling volumes ranged from 17*18 dscf (0»49 nan) to 28*93 dscf
(0.82 ncai). Values for the percent isokinetie sampling rate ranged frota
98*0 to 99.0.

          Ambient air composition values were again used and the percent
moisture values ranged from 1*2 to 1.7%.

          Table 9 presents an approximate breakdown of the weight of ma-
terial collected in the probe-cyclone and filter for each run and the ap-
proximate size fraction this weight represents. It appears that approxi-
mately 99 and 907. of the material collected during the tunnel belt and
bin vent tests, respectively, is of size greater than 5 y,»

-------
                                                        6

                                           OF PARTICULATE         -
Particulate Load Emission Factor
Run fijlES £E/£2£^^
b/
Tunnel Belt
8-TBG October 31 1.644 3,760
9-TBC October 31 1*602 3,660
Average 1,623 3,710
^Ib/hri/ lb/ton£f^


10? 48,7 0,892
110 49.9 0.917
109 49,3 0.908



0.446
0,459
0,454
aj  gr/dse£ — Grains per dry standard cubic foot
    mg/ncm = Milligrams per normal cubic meter
    Ib/hr = Pounds per hour
    kg/hr = Kilograms per hour
    Ib/ton = Pounds emissions per ton grain handled
    kg/Mton = Kilograms emissions per metric ton grain handled
bl  Includes tunnel belt drop point, pulley hoods, leg cross belt, and leg boot.

-------
                                                        ?



                                                                                             Probe-Cyclone
                                          Probe-Cyclone             Filter (rag)              Versus total
 Run                 Date                 l2ii_>5Pr'             <5pj>0,3 v&.'
a/  Size fraction  information  obtained from Research Appliance Company*
jb/  Includes  tunnel  belt  drop  point,  pulley hoods,  leg cross belt* and leg boot.
Tunnel Belt-*
8-TBC October 31 2,982 1?
9-TBG October 31 3,051 " 19
Average 3,016 18

99
99
99

-------
                                                 TABLE 8

                                          OF PAKTICULATE         -
P articulate Load Emission Factor
Run
Date gr/ttsc£2/ raR/ncnfi/ ib/hrj?/ kg/hra/ Ib/tonjy
HtonF"
Tunnel Belt"2
10-TBM
12 -IBM


il-BVM

October 31 1,043 2,390 70,1 31 .8 0,584
October 31 1,244 2,850 81.9 37.1 0.683
Average 1.144 2,620 76.0 34.5 0,633
Bin Vent^
October 31 0,72? 1,660 4.0 1.8 0.033
Average 0.721 1,660 4,0 1*8 0*033
0.292
0,341
0.317

0,01?
0,017
of  gr/dsc£ = Grains per dry standard cubic foot
    mg/ncm = Milligrams per notnmai cubic meter
    Ib/hr — Pounds per hour
    kg/hr = Kilograms per hour
    Ib/ton = Pounds emissions per ton grain handled
    kg/Mton =s Kilograms emissions per metric ton grain handled
js/  Includes tunnel belt drop point* pulley hoods>  leg cross belt,  and  leg  boot*
c/  Bin  vent oaiy  (standard  bin).

-------
                                                  TABLE 9

                               ^^

                                                                                             Probe-Cyclone
                                          Probe-Cycloae             Filter (mg)               ¥ersus Total
                                          (mg)  > 5 P^/            < 5 p..
b/
Tunnel Belt—
10-TBM October 31 1,946 14
12-TBM October 31 2 ,270 20
Average 2S108 17
c/
Bin Vent""
11-BVM October 31 733 78
Average . 733 78


99
99
99


90
90
a/  Size  fraction  information obtained from Research Appliance Company*
jj/  Includes tunnel  belt  drop point,  pulley hoods,  leg cross  belt,  and leg boot.
cj  Bin vent only  (standard  bin).

-------
                                          AND
          The Great Bend Cooperative Association's Elevator B operates  as
a typical country grain elevator* It has a storage capacity of 570,000
bushels of grain® The agricultural area chat the elevator serves primarily
grows four grain crops:  wheat, tailo (grain sorghum), soybeans, and com.
A
          The elevator receives grain direct from the farmer aad immediately
transfers it into fains* The grain may be held in storage for the farmer or
processed for sale and shipment to a feed mill, grain mill, or terminal ele-
vator* The grain may be dried at the elevator If wet, or handled as received*
It also may be treated chemically if wet or to control insects.

          A schematic diagram of the operation of Elevator B is shown in
Figure I. The grain is transported by the farmer to the elevator and dumped
into the truck dump hopper. The elevator legs transport the 'grain to the
headhouse where it is distributed Into one of the several bins* Grain may
also be circulated from bin to bin during treatment or cooling operations
utilizing the tunnel belts and elevator legs*

          Most grain handling activities are connected to the dust emission
control system, thought by elevator personnel to have been constructed in
the mid-19401 s» All dust collection points are ducted to a contaon duct run-
ning from the basement area to the cyclone on the roof*

          The ducting begins at the far eads of the tunnel belts with, small
hoods serving the belt pulleys. The ducts run the length of the tunnel belts
to the center of the elevator building* Along this length, ducts serving the
small dust hoods at each bin tunnel belt drop point join the comaon duct at
intervals* At the center of the elevator building, ducts serving the eleva-
tor leg boots, leg cross belt, belt pulleys, and grain scale join, the conroon
duct. The dust duct then runs up the building wall to the fan at the elevator
leg head level* Just below, at the gallery belt level, further ductiag joins
the system. Two ducts begin at the far end of the gallery belts at the pulley
hoods* Running the length of the gallery* they are joined by the bin vent
ducts at intervals* The bin vents are ducts Inserted into the bin near the
grain entry hole, flush with the bin roof. Other ducts serving the elevator
leg transfer points (gallery belt hoods) also meet the common duct ac this
point» Just before the fan, the duct serving the one controlled elevator
leg head joins the system* From the fait, the dust control ducting is di-
rected to two cyclones in parallel* However* as one cyclone Is almost com-
pletely filled with dust, essentially oaly one cyclone is in operation.
The collected dust is trucked to landfill but is not weighed or estimated
as to amount*

                                   13

-------
Atmosphere
  Load-Out
  to Raft Cars
              Figure 1 - Schematic of Process Operation--Great  Bend,  Kansas,
                            Cooperative Association, Elevator  B
                                            14

-------
          The dust control fan Is run at all times that grain handling Is
taking place. Eadh separate duct is equipped with a slide valve  so  that
those ducts  serving inactive operations may be closed off, providing ade-
quate air flow  for active operations.
B
          The purpose of the tests was to measure uncontrolled emission
levels duriag normal elevator operation and use these data to compute un-
controlled emission factors* Standard operation of the elevator is  to give
priority to grain load-out operations over grain turning or creating. Load-
out  operations Involve the tunnel belt, leg cross belt,, two of the three
elevator legs, and the grain scale* The third elevator leg may be used to
handle grain received by the elevator from farmers , if necessary. After
load-out, the tunnel belt, leg cross belt, one elevator teg» and gallery
belt way be used for grain turning (bin transfer) used to treat, aerate,
or cool scored grain.

          This priority system was followed during the test series* Mo
grain was received during load-out tests* Every effort was made to  have
open only those ducts serving active operations. The dusc ducts used dur-
ing load-out tests were chose controlling the bin tinmel belt drop  point,
tunael belt pulleys* elevator     bootSj leg cross belt, and grata  scale.
Those used for the tunnel belt (bin transfer) tests were the same with
the exclusion of one elevator leg boot and the grain scale* The bin vent
tests involved only chat vent serving the bin being filled* Figures 2, 3,
and 4 show schematics of these operations* Note that neither the load-out
nor the bin transfer tests included either the leg transfer points  (gal-
lery belt hoods) or lone leg head duet thac are shown meeting the conraon
duct above the, sampling sites In Figure !•

          Grain handling rates were obtained from elevator personnel* These
were approximately 200,000 Ib/hr (90,720 kg/hr) for load-out operations and
240,000 Ib/hr (108,360 kg/hr) for bin transfer operations. Table 10 presents
a summary of the grain data versus the sampling periods*

          Cursory observation of the dust emission control system indicates
a fairly good capture efficiency. The hoods seem, to trap most of the dust
with liccle encrainment of grain. So observations could be made on  the
closed systems, such as the elevator leg, boots and heads*
                                    15

-------
  o.  Plan
               To Cyclone
                                                    b. Elevation
   Sampi ing
   Ports

23-3/4" ID
Building
Wall
North
                                                Tunnel  Belt Drop  Point
        'Cross Belt
         •Elevator  Leg
                     Figure  2  - Schematic of Sampling Slte--Load-Out

                                            16
                                                                                 Tunnel Belt
                                                                                 Pulley

-------
 a.  Plan
              To Cyclone
                                                   b. Elevation
   Sampling
   Ports

23-3/4" ID
                                                                                  Building
                                                                                  Wa!i
                                                                                 North
       Building Wall
is^e  Dust Control
      System Duct
     \
                                               Tunnel  Belt Drop  Point
       Cross Belt
         E ievator Leg
                                                                            Slide Valve
                                                                                    J
                                                                                Tunnel Belt
                                                                               'Pul
                                                                                   ey
                    Figure  3  -  Schematic of  Sampling Site--Tunnel  Belt
                                            17

-------
To Fan 4 Cyclone
                                         a. Standard 8in
                                                     ^•»''*^*> To Fan &
                                                    I   -*•••*  Cyclone
                                                           Sampling
                                                           Port
                                       Grain
                                                    Duit
                                              Bin
                                        b, Gfoin $«!« Sin
                    Figure 4  - Schematic of Sampling  Site—Bin Vent
                                               18

-------
                                         10
                                       VERSUS	














Soybeans:  Load-Out
I-LOS
2-LOS
3-LOW
6-LOff
4-TBW

         October 29
         October 29
Wheati  Load-Out
         October 29
         October 31
Wheat:  Tunnel Belt
         October 29
Wheat:  Bin Vent
         October 30
^^^-o-^SEli^H;

Ttoe
t
9 0929-0959
1004-1034


9 1054-1124
1127-115?


9 1535-1605
1609-1639


1 0903-0933
0937-100?


9 1653-1723
1727-1757


3
0937-100?


Duration
(min).
30
30
60

30
30
60

30
30
60

30
30
60

30
30
60

30
30
60

Grain
Ib
100,000

200,000
(100 tons)
100,000

200,000
(100 tons)
100,000

200,000
(100 tons)
100,000

200,000
(100 tons)
120,000

240^000
(120 tons)
100,000

200,000
(100 tons)
JMsiyL—-
M
45,360

90,720
(90,7 Mtons)
45,360

90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
45,360

90,720
(90.7 MCORS)
45,360

90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
54,430

108,860
(108. 9 Mtons)
45,360

90,720
(90.7 Mtons}
                                      19

-------
                             TABLE 10 (Concluded)
                              Sapling
7-BW    October 31
Corn;  Tunnel Bele

         October 31
9-IBC    October 31
Milo:  Tunnel Beic

10-TBM   October 31
12-TBM   October 31
Miloj  Bin Vent

11-BVM   October 31
1515-1545
1549-1619
1645-1715
1719-1749
1527-1557
1603-1633
                                    Duration
                                GrainWeight
Time
0902-0907
0918-0943
0949-1019

5
25
30
80
Ib
16,667
83,333
200,000
(100 tons)
M
7,560
37S800
90,720
(90.7 Mtons)
1200-1205
1235-1300
1305-1335


1349-1419
1422-1452


5
25
30
60

30
30
60

20,000
100,000

240,000
(120 tons)
120,000

240,000
(120 tons)
30
30
60
30
30
60
30
30
60
 120,000

 240,000
(120 tons)

 120fOOO

 240,000
(120 cons)
 120,000

 240,000
(120 tons)
                                            9,070
                                           45,360

                                          103,860
                                       (108,9 Mtons}

                                           54,430

                                          108,360
                                       (108.9 Mtons}
    54,430
    34,430
   108,860
(108,9  Mtons)

    54,430

   108,860
(108.9  Mtons)
    54,430

   108,860
(108,9 Mtons)
                                      20

-------
                    IV.           OF
          Figures 2 and 3 show a schematic of the load-out and tunnel belt
sampling sites, respectively. Figure 4 presents a similar layout for the
bin vent system. The location of the sampling sites     in accordance with
                 guidelines*
          Table 11 presents the sampling point locations for the ducts.
                V.           AND
          Fartictilate samples were taken with Research Appliance Company
Model 2243 "Stacksanplr" equipment, modified by MRI» Sampling traia speci-
fications were in compliance with the £ederal^tegis^tgri Vol. 36» Mo* 247,
Part II, December 23, 1971.

          A preliminary velocity traverse was made for each duct* A stain-
less steel probe liner was used for all tests* Since the gas stream, was
ambient air at near ambient temperature, no probe or filter lieaters were
used*

          Due to space limitations on the bin vent ducts, a right-angle,
stainless steel extension was made for use on one traverse. As the bin
vent ducts were of small diameter, velocity traverses were taken separately
prior to the sampling traverses for each traverse in order to lessen the
flow disturbances possible from the large pitob in. the small duct.

          Sampling times were chosen as 1 hr upon, the request and approval
o£ the project monitor* Five-minute sample times per point were used on
the load-out and tunnel belt tests while 7-1/2 rain sample tines per point
were used on the bin, vent tests»

          As has been mentioned previously in the report, percent moisture
values for the gas stream were obtained using a sling psychroaeter and a
psychroraetric chart. The     composition of the stream was taken to be that
of ambient air..

          Analysis of the samples was In compliance with the referenced
FederalReeister.
                                    21

-------
                       TABLE 11
"Loud-Out     funnel Belt
Duct ID = 23.75 its.
  1
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
Fraction of
  Duet ID


     4.4
    14,7
    29*5
    70.5
    85,3
    95.6
Duct ID = 4»G in.

  1
  2
  3
  4



Duct ID ~ 5.375 iru

  I
  2
  3
  4
     6,7
    25.0
    ?S»0
    93*3
     6,7
    25.0
    75.0
    93,3
                                      Distance From
                                       Inside Wall
 1-0
 3-1/2
 7-0
16-3/4
20-1/4
22-3/4
 1-0
 1-1/4
 2-3/4
 3-0
 1-0
 1-1/2
 4-3/8
 4-7/8
                          22

-------

OF         -          OF
                 23

-------
ta
*-
                                           TABLE A-l



                            PART1CULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
                                  RUN-
l-LOS  DATE- 10-Z9-7S
ATMOS
TEMP
06, F 1
50*0
PORT-
POINT

N 1
N 2
N 3
H 4
N 5
N 6
I" 1
E 2
E 3
E 4
fc 5
F 6
ATMOS
U.HG)
Z8.44
SAMP
TIME
(MINI
5.00
S-OG
5, SO
5®00
5*00
5.00
5.00
5,00
S»§0
5,00
5^00
5.00
STACK
VAC
U.H20)
-3*90
METER
VOt
IOCFJ f
324,59
326,75'
329, E7
332.2?
335*22
33?, 96
340.98
343.68
346,04
348,78
351,99
354,63
H>0
CON0
(ML)
4*6
DELTA
P
i.Haoi
.660
,560

1.100
1.000
-910
.980
• 700
.736
«*>7Q
1,000
.940
PART1C
WT-PTL
IMS)
95TQ*QO
OEiTA
H
(I.HPOi
^940
,,800
»9TQ
1.550
1»420
1.300
1,400
1.000
1,050
1,386
1 ®420
U3SO
PARTIC STACK
WT-TTL AHEA
IFT?)
9570
TEMP
IN
<0,F)
48*0
54.0
6�
66.0
76.0
76,0
76,0
76® 0
76*0
18,0
80*0
04.0
,00
TEMP
OUT
CD.F)
48*0
4.9®C
58,0
52^0
54,0
56.0
60.0
62*0
62,0
64,0
66*0
66 .0
3,68
TRAIN
V/^C

322,24
STACK
TEMP
' (O.F)
4§,0
46*0
46,0
46,0
46^0
46.0
46,0
46*0
46,0
46»0
46*0
46,0
PERC PITOT
Q'l C02 CO TUBE
OR¥
20. .9
S.6EL
TEMP
10, f)
§0*0
50.0
50*0
SO.Q
50»0
50^0
50,0
50,0
50.0
50,0
50,0
SQ«0
DRY DRY
§,0 0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
,188
.188
• 188
.188
• iaa
,188
ass
.186
.188
,188
.108
.188
*0 »T4ft

VEI.
(F-M)
2439,0
2239^6
246S»0
3t3fi,9
2992.8

2^62,8
2504,0
2557.1
294?, 6
2992,6
2901,7

-------
                                             TABLE A-2
                              PARTICULATE DATA  AND  CALCULATED VALUES
HUN-   2-LOS
                                                        lft-29-7t>
U»
TEMP
OG.F)
50*0
PORT-
POINT

E 1
IT 2
t: 3
F 4
f 5
F. 6
N I
N 2
N 3
N 4
N 5
N "6
A TWOS
PRES
CI.HG)
?8,48
SUMP
TIMK
(HIM)
5*00
5,00
5.06
5.00
5,00
5.00
5,00
5.00
S.OO
5,00
5*80
5*00
STACK H?0
VAC
(T.M20) IMll
-3*90

VOl,
<0-. F> <
351,31
3S9»?T
362.4?
365*47
368*38
371.11
313,87
375,69
378,24
381.20
384,56
387.41
3.9
DELTA
p
EI.H20) i

«640
*teo
1.000
.930
®84§
«56§
,510
^660
1.100
1.100
.900
PART1C PART1C STACK INIT
WT-PTL MT-TTL VOL
IFT«?I CDCFJ
5757.10 STST.IO
DELTA
H
(I.H?0)
.810
.930
1.400
I, 400
1.320
1,200
.810
,820
.940
1,580
1.580
JU280
TEMP
IN
•CO. Ft
61^0
72,0
??«,0

84,0
86.0
84,0
8&»8
flfe^O
88,0
92*0
94«i
TEMP
oyi
fD.fi
61,0
67.0
67,0
68,0
69.0
10*0
71.0
72,0
72.0
72,0
72,0
7ft,, 0
3,08
TRAIN
VsC
11. HG!
2. ft
2,0
2.5
2.5
2*5
a. 5
2*0
2*0
2*5
2.5
2,5
2«»S
STACK
TEMP
CO. Ft
49*0
51.0
80*0
49,0
50.0
sue
50.0
SQ.O
51.0
51,0
51.0
51.0
P1TOT
02 COB CO TUBE
DRV DRY DRY COEF
20,9

TEMP
10, PI
54»§
S«t-»S
§4«§
54^0
54.0
54.0
54»0
54*0
S4®0
54.0
54,0
54.0
0*0 0.0 #7*6
PROBE
T OlA
(INI
,188
.188
«iaa
• isa
«188
.iaa
.188
* 188
.iaa
• iaa
,188
,188

¥E«
IFf^'J
2323,5
24-04**
2972,4
2999.6
2855.5
2134^6
22*6,9
2266^9
2441*1
3152,2
3152.2
2851.3

-------
                                             TABLE A-3
                              PARTICIPATE      AND CALCULATED
                                          3-LOW  DATE-  10-29-7S
to
ATMOS
TEMP

38?»4l
STACK
TEMP
i (O.F)
58tO
60*0
60»§
60,0
61.0
61,0
61.0
f»2n0
62^0
62,0
63^0
63.0
P!T«
O2 C02 CO TUl
DRY
?0,9
S.-EL
TEMF"
(O.F)
60^0
60^0
fcfisO
60^0
60,0
60,0
60tO
60*0
60.0
60.0
60,0
6§»0
DRY DRY HOI
0*0 0
PrtOBf
T DlA
I1N»
.198
.188
,186
.186
.188
ass
.188
.188
.168
.188.
.188
, IftS
,0 ,7-

VCI
IFP^j
293f,0
2252*4
??33<,S
3037,2
3024^9
2835,6
2T5E.9
3564*1
2902^9
3191.6
3336,7
3045,9

-------
                TABLE A-4
^ARTICULATE       AND CALCULATED ¥AtUES
             4--TBW  t)"T£>  10-2l><-75
ATMOS
f)6,Fi
61,0
PORT


E
E
K.
e
F
f"
N
N'
N
N
N
iij


f

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
S
6
ATMOS
il.HSI
28,35

TIME
(MINI
5*00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5*80
5.00
S.QQ
5,00
5,00
5.00
5,00
§,,§0
STACK
VftC
-3.90
METER
VOL
(DrF) **0
64.0
64.0
64*0
64i,0
63,0
6%»0
64^0
65.0
64,0
64*0
P1TOT
02 C02 CO
ORY DRY OW¥ ry£F
20. <
S.6EL
TEMP
(O.F)
53,8
53.0
53,0
53.0
53,0
53,0
53*6
53»0
53,0
53.0
53.0
53.0
0«0 0»§ ,746
PROBE
T 014
f IN!
.186
• IBB


.188
.188
.186
.168
.188
% 188
.186
.188

VEl
IFP«I
2813,4
2S71.3
2846,3

3?0fl%5
2^42^8
333^,6
2553.1
2926*9
3039*1
2989*9
£1113.4

-------
               TABLE A-5




PART1CULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VAIUES






            5-BVW  DATE-  10-30-fS
ATHOS
TEMP
DG.F)
§S»0
PORT-
POINT

E 1
£ 1
e 2
H 2
lr 3
F, 3
f 4
£ 4
N 1
N I
N 2
N 2
N 3
N 3
N 4
N 4
ATMOS
TOES
U«HG)
28.17
SAMP
TIME
{MINI
s.eo
2®50
2,50
5,00
5,00
2,50
?«50
S,00
5.00
2.50
i>*50
5,00
5,00
?«S0
?«S0
5. 00
STACK
(I.HPOl
-2.60
METER
VOI.
IDcfl <;
144.22
146*29
148,35
1SE.57
156*42
1511*40
160.60
164^02
Ib9»30
171.46
173,59
177.93
182.30
164.48
186*65
191,03
f«L»
9,2
DELTA
P
UH20)
1.600
1,600
1.600
1,600
1.500
1.500
1,500
1.500
1,700
1.700
1.6Q0
U&OO
1.600
1.600
1.600
1®60U
PARTIC PART1C STACK 1MT
WT-PTL KT-TTL AREA VOL
(MGt {FT?! COCFi
1460,80 1460^88
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
2^300
2*300
2.300
2.300
2*100
2.100
2, l§0
2.100
2,400
?»48§
2,300
2. 300
2*360
2,300
a, 300
2,300
TEMP
IN
10. F)
54*0
61,0
f»6.Q
70*0
78,0
82,0
ftf»,0
§7*0
Ui*#0
88*0
92*0
94, 0
98,0
100. 0
10?, 0
102.0
TEMP
OUT
tO.f!
S2»0
52^0
53,0
53.0
56,0
58*0
60»§
61.0
64»0
66.0
67^0
68,0
7Q»0
72^0
74«0
74.9
.09 140*10
TRAIN
V4C

-------
               TABLE A-6
PARTICUIATE      AMD CALCULATED  VALUES
            6-1OW  PftTE*  10-31-75
AT«OS
TEMP
06. FI
61,0
PORT-
POINT

N i
N 2
N 3
N 4
N 5
n 6
f 1
E a
e 3
f 4
F 5
F 6
ATHOS
Pft€S
(I, HOI
37,74
SAMF
TIME
CHIN)
5.00
5.QO
5,00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5»OQ
5,00
5*00
5,00
5*00
5,00
STACK
VAC
n.H?o)
-3.90
rtETER
VOi
(o«T) t;
459*99
461.42
464® GO
466*83
469,64
47?«Sl
474. 78
477,26
480*09
483, Of
4ft6.?S
488*98
M.>0
IML)
8.3
DELTA
P
f jLl J*"| f*| *
1 @ «f 4" W f
^610
»7iO
«**00
1.000
,930
.830
.580
.720
*B'(Q
U100
^950
»790
PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-PtL Wf-TTL ¥01.
IM6I IMGI (FT'') I0CFI
1639.90 1639*90
DELTA
H
(I.HPOI

I. 018
1.276
1.410
1.30C
1,200
0840
1.030
l»2SO
1.570
1.360
1 .120
TEMP
IN

60. 0
62,0
66*0
73.0
BO* 0
84*0
78*0
85.0
88.0
91.0
95,6
9t».0
TEMP
OUT
10. F)
60,11
60»§
62,0
63,0
65.0
6-fl^O
70*0
72»0
7.».0
75,9
76,0
78,0
3, OS 456*73
TRAIN
VAC
U,HG»
2,0
2,0
2.0
?*0
2,0
2*0
2.0
2,»0
2.0
2»0
2.0
2.0
STAC/
TEMP
l§*Fi
62.0
63%0
63*0
63*0
63, 0
63.0
63.0
63.0
63.0
63*0
63.0
63*0
PIT'
0? C02 CO "tlii
DRY DRY DRY roi
20,9
S.GEi
TEMP
fO^F)
51.0
bl.O
51,0
51. 0
51,0
51.0
51.0
">1 .0
51.6
51.0
51.0
51.0
§,0 8,0 ,7>
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.188
. i§8
.IB8
. IBS
.188
.188
'
.188
.188
.188
.188
,188

VEi
(FP---J
2406. 8
erS9%» 1
2^26,3
30ft4,6
?974,6
2810»?
2349,1
2^17.3
2877*1
3235.1
30§6«S
2741.6

-------
O
                                            TABLE A-7



                             ^ARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED  VALUES
7-BVW
                                                    - JO-31-7«»
ATHOS
TEMP
OG.F)
61.0
PORT-
POINT

N 1
N 1
N 2
N 2
N 3
N 3
N 4
n 4
W 1
W &
W 1
W 3
W 2
W 3
W 3
Lyf A
W 4
ATMOS
a, HO)
g7.74
SAMP
TIME
(HIM)
5,00
2, SO
2®50
5,00
5*00
2*50
2®SQ
§*§e
5*00
2*50
z.so
5.00
5.00
2,50
2*50
5.00
STACK H/'O
VAC
(l.H?0) CMLl
-2,60
MEIER
¥01.
torn
192.62
193.82
194.56
196,38
198.30
199*18
200.18

204.16
E04.88
£05®6Q
207.67
20 -'»4S
210.34
211,29
?13* 1 1
-..7
DELTA
P

U500
1,500
1*500
1*500
1.600
1.600
1*700
1.700
U500
1*500
1.500
1. 500
1 »500
1.500
1,500
1,500
PA«TIC PARTIC STACK iNlT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AMEA VOL

-------
u>
                                            TABLE A-8



                            PAkTlCULATE       AND            VALUES
8-TBC
                                                    - 10-31-76

06, Fl
65.0
PORT-
POINT

f: i
e 2
K 3
F 4
fc 5
F 6
M 1
N 2
N 3
N 4
N 5
N 6
ATMOS
PRES
U,HG)
27.71
SAMP
TIME

5.00
5,60
5.00
5®00
5,00
5.00
5*00
5,60
5.05
5^00
5. 00
S.,60
STACK
VAC
tl.HZO)
-3.90
METER
VOi
CChTJ I
490*93
493.18
495^84
498.41
501.16
503.7?
506.18
508,35
510.8?
513,8?
516, ftS
519. a**

fMLI
9*0
DELTA
P
I.H20)

.640
®?60
,790
,800
«740
.460
,,550
.660
,980
1*000
,950
PART ic
wet


}.«

,640
,810
1*100
1,130
1,150
1*070
.940
,790
.940
1,380
1.410
1.360
PARTIC 5
WT-TTL
•
IfT^J
299S
TEMP
IN
C0*Fi
68,0
70.0
72.0
78*0
04,0
89 .0
88,0
92.0
94*0
96*0
100,0
102«,Q
.90

OUT
CO^FI

69 . 8
70.0
71.0
72*0
74.0
76.0
18,0
79.0
80*0
B3.0
e.4,,0
3*0«
TRAIN
v&c
(I.HOJ
2.0
2,0
2,0
?»Q
2.0
2*0
2«0
H® §
2*0
2,0
2«0
2*0
IMIT
VOL
kCOCFJ
488. 98
STftCl^
TEMP
' «D»(r)
65*0
fcS.O
65«&
65,0
65.0
65*0
65,8
65»0
65,0
65*0
65*0
65,0
PITOT
02 C02 CO rOBE
DRY
30,9
S.CiEL
TEMP
(O.F)
52*0
52*0
52.0
5E.O
52*0
52,0
52®0
52,0
82. ,8
52*0
52,0
52*0
f)«Y DR¥ COEF
0. 0 §
PROBE
T DIA
f IN)
.188
• 168
.188
.188
^188
,188
* IS8
.188
,188
.188
.188
.188
,0 *74/,

¥ffi
IFPt-*}
2051.8
J4T4S6
2696,6
??49^3
2766,7
2660.9
2512*9
2294^0
2512»9
3062,1
3093. Z
3014*9

-------
               TABLE A-9




PARTICIPATE DATA  AND  CALCULATED VALUES






     »U'.i-   9-TBC DATE- ln-31-75
TEMP
£}6,F»
65.0
PORT-
POINT

N 1
N 2
M 3
N 4
N §
N 6
t 1
fJ 2
f 3
t 4
1- 5
*•' 6
STACK
VAC
IUH8J IUHPOI
27.11

TIME
(MINI
5»00
5,00
5*00
5,00
5,00
5,00
5,00
5.00
5»§f>
5.00
5«,8Q
5,00
-3*90
METER
VOL
(Dm (]
522*63
524*84
5Z7.26
530.24
S33.45
536*52
538*9?
541*58
544.42
5%7»4T
SSe.43
553,00
H?0
COM?'
(ML I
7.5
OELTA
p
t.H20) i
,850
t540
%620
1.000
1.100
• 970
.600
.750
®8feO
,960
»92Q
,710
PHRTIC PAKTIC STACK JNIT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL
(PTf) fOCfl
3069,30 3069,30
DELTA
H
I!*H?€»
1*200
®7iO
«,880
1.400
I. 550
1*300
,866
1.050
1,200
1,400
1*300
1,060
TEMP
IN
fD*F»
86 .0
91.0
94*8
96^,0
ioe.o
104.0
98*0
101,0
iO%*0
107,0
110,0
111*0
TEMP
OUT
CO.F)
83. §
84 .0
84,0
H4.0
BS»0
fl6®0
tt6«0
87,0

88^0
90*0
^0,0
PERC PIT
OE C02 CO TU
DRY DRY 0«Y C,d
519,84- ?Q*9
TRAI--
VAC
II^HGl
1.0
1.0
1.0
uo
1.0
uo
uo
uo
1*0
uo
1.0
uo
STACf*
TEHP
to, ft
65.0
65^0
66*0
66*0
66.0
66.0
66.0
66,0
68»6
68.0
68.0
68.0
S^GEL
TEMP
10, Fi
52*0
52.0
52,0
52^0
52.0
52«0
52.0
52® 0
52.0
52®0
52.0
52*0
0,0 9.0 ,7-
PH08E
T I") I ft
(IN)
,188
.188
,188
,188
.188
• 188
,180
*188
• 188
.188
»188
,188

VEL
{fp?,)
2850,2
2271.7
243fe€S
3094,4
3H4S.4
3047.6
3396^9
2679»8
2875.1
303?, 6
F973.7
2612.3

-------
               TABLE A-10




PARTICULATE       AND  CALCULATED VALUES






     RUN-  10-TB't  i>ATE- 10-31-7S
TEMP
DG.F1
69, 0
POST-
POINT

,: i
t" 2
F 3
fc 4
f 5
f 6
N 1
M 2
sy "i
N 4
h 5
N 6
n.Hoi
27^65
SAMP
TIME
CHIN!
5,00
5.00
*>*QQ
5,00
5,00
5*00
5,00
5,00
5.00
5,00
§»GQ
5*00
STAC- H?0
¥AC
fl*H?OJ CMl!
-3.90
METER
VOt

555*29
SSI® 73
S60.71
563.68
546 «,48
569, 1ft
571.45
573. 92
5T6»52
579,60
582,61
SEiS.59
7,4
DELTA
p
(J,H20> i
.570
*67fl
.680
.980
.816
®Q00
,540
,640
^76t
1,000
1,000
• ftSO
PART1C STACw IMIT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL
(FT?) IOf.F»
1959*7§ 1959»70 3.08 553,00

i I
U.H20)
,826
,950
1,250
1*380
1.170
1.150
®?8§
,910
1.090
1 *4<*Q
1.420
1.230
TEMP
IN
tD»F»
88*0
89.0
96,0
102*0
104,0
105.0
100.0
160.0
100,0
IQQdQ
102,0
105. §
TEMP
our
(O.FI
86.0
86,0
86^0
87,0
88,0
90.0
88^0
88^0
88,0
88*6
H9.0
89,0
TRAIN
V.e>C
(I.H6)
2.0
2,6
2»,6
2.0
2,0
2,0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2»fi
2.0
2,0
STACK
TEMP
tD*Fi
S8-0
68*0
68,0
68*0
68%0
68*0
68. 0
68,0
68,0
68®0
68^0
68.0
PERC PI TOT
02 CQ2 CO
DRY DRY DRY LOEF
20.9
S.6€L
TEMP
10. Fl
52.0
52*0
52*0
52,0
52.0
5?®Q
52.0
52.0
52*0
52«Q
52.0
S2.0
0,0 0,0 »T*6
FROBC
T OlA
UN!
• 188
.188
.188
.188
* 188
% 188
• 1 88
.188
,188
^188
.188
.188

VEi
M)
2343,2
?5*0®4
29H.&
3072*4
?793«3
?776.0
2280,1
?482®9
270^.7
3103.6
3103.6
2861,4

-------
               TABLE A-LI



fARTlCULATE DATA  AND CALCULATED VALUES






     RUN-  11-8VH  U'-Tfc- liS-3i-?H
ATHOS
TEMP
06. F I
70.0
PORT-
POINT

E i
t! 1
t 2
6 2
E 3
t 3
fc* %
F. 4
N I
N I
N 2
N 2
N J
N 3
N 4
H 4
ATHOS
PRES
27.65

TIME
WIN}
5,80
2.50
2*50
5,00
5,00
2*50
2*50
Ss§§
5*00
2*50
2*50
5® 00
5*00
£.50
2®50
5* 00
STACK
-1*60
METEK
¥0!
torn i
?1S»§&
215,12
216*59
210.35
220,01
2HO»TB
221,55
223^01
224,35
22*. 90
225*4-7
2?6,R?
2«?b«!i?
2H9, 42
230, ??
232.07
IMLi
4.4
DELTA
P
1.H20) I
1.300
1.300
l.SQO
1.500
1.200
1.200
,880

%• o ™^ CJF
a 0 *3f 0
,900
t900
1.300
U300
1.200
1.200
PARTI C PART1C STACK IMIT
MT-PTL WT-TTL AftEA VOL
fMG) (FT?) fOCF)
811.60 ail. 60 ,19 213.11
DELTA
H
Jjtj "2« rf% h
^ ff jT \J S
,360
. 356
,410
®4i 0
• 320
,,320
,240
»240
. 180
,180
o£4Q
,240
,366
.360
*320
,320
TEMP
IN

72,0
74.0
75.0
80,0
82,0
84*0
86S0
86, §
8%cO
86,0
86^0
88®0
92,0
94^8
9S*Q
96,0
TE«P
OUT
(O.F)
7Q*G
?0«0
70^0
T2.0
72.0
74,0
TS»0
?5»0
78^6
79® 0
B0®§
80.0
fl2®0
J*2.0
»4.0
64® 0
TRAIN
Vflf
CI.H6J
UO
UO
UO
1.0
uo
uo
uo
uo
uo
uo
uo
1.0
uo
uo
uo
uo
STACK
TEMP
CD.FI

65^0
65, §
65,0
65^0
65.0
65,0
65,0
65.0
6S«0
65^0
45^0
65,0
65,6
6S*0
65.0
P1TOT
02 CO? CO TUBE
ORY DRY ORY COEF
20,9 0,0 0^0 *S38
s.eet
TEMP
10. F)
52,0
52,6
§2,0
52*0
52.0
52..0
52.0

52,0
52*0
52*0
se.o
52,0
52.0
52,0
52.0

T 01 ft
'>
3975««
3975.8
4270,7
4270.7
3619*9
3819,9
3371,1
3271.1
2H11.3
2811. i
330^.1
330M.1
3975,8
3975, »
3H19,9
3*' 19,9

-------
UJ
tn
                                                A-12


                                              AND  CALCULATEO VALUES



                                 «U--   12-TBM  DATE- lft-31-/b
TFMP
06, PJ
PORT-

N
N
N
N
W
N
e
t:
E
€
F
t

i
2
3
4.
5
6
1
2
3
4
B
6
ATMOS
PfCS
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
§»§§
5.00
5*00
St»o§
5,00
s.oo
5,90
5*00
§,,00
5. 06
5.00
5.00
STACK
(IT i^i *5 f*% i
^ # l» ^ %* f
METfR
V0».
(0. F! I
881*66
589*9?
592..S5
595*61
£* j*\ jtj jt *ji
«3t rf O" 
-------
                                    A-13  '

                        PttRTICULATE  EMISSION DATA
NAME      DESCRIPTION             UNITS

       P&TE Of  RUM

ON            TIP  DIAMETER            IN
TT     NET TIME OF  RUN
P8     BAROMETRIC
PH     AVG ORIFICE
VH     VOL DRY  OfcS-HETER CGND       DCF
TM     AVS SAS  METEfi TEPP         DE0®F
       VOL OPY  6AS-STD             QSCF
VW     TOTAL  H20  COLLECTED           ML
VW¥    VOL H2G  W^PQR-STO            SCF
                MOISTUPE IJY  VOL
MO     MOLE FRACTION 0«?Y GAS
PC02   PERCE.MT  C02  «Y ¥OL *  DRY
P02             02 ,-»Y VOLt DRY
PCO    PERCENT  CO «Y VOL* DRY
PN2    PERCENT  N8 :»Y VOLt DRY
M\*0    HOLECULA"  -VT-ORY ST< GAS
MW     WOLECUlA^  'IT-STK 6AS
CP     PITOT  TU^E COEFFICIENT
OPS    AVB STK  VELOCITY HEAD     IN.H20
TS     4¥G STA-'r  TEMPERATURE      0€6*F
*JP     M€T SdWPi JMG POINTS
PST    STATIC PRKS  OF STftCK       !\.H6
PS     STACrf  PRESSURE, ABSOLUTE   IN.HG
VS     AV6 STACK  6AS VELOCITY       FPM
AS     STACK  A'"'£A                  IN?
QAM    ACTUAL STACs FLOWRATE     M3/M1M
QS     STK FLOwRAT^t ORYtSTO CN   OSCfH
ftA     ACTUAL STACK fLOteRATE       ACFM
                I^OKlNETlC
HF     PARTICULATE  «T-»ART1AL        MG
MT     PAPT1CULATS  WT-TOTAL          Mfi
1C     PERC I^PIMGER C^TCH
CAN    PART*  LOAO-PTL.STO CN   GR/DSCf
CAO    PART,  LOAO-TTL.STO CN   6R/DSCF
CAT    PART*  LOAO-PTL.ST^ CN     6R/ACF
CAU    PARTS  LOAD-TIL.STK CN     SR/ACf
CAW    PART1C EMIS-PARTIAL        L8/NR
CAM    PARTIC £H!S-TOTAL          L8/HR
1-LOS
10-29-75
,188
60-0
28,44-
1 . 2 1 c
3?^59
64.?
31,42
4. )
.19
0- fr
ft rt, A
o»§
20*9
0..0
79.1
28,84
2B&77
,746
*8C>2
45. «
R
®Z9
?8*73
?750
444
239*8
8467
04^9
98. r
^570,00
^570.00
0,00
4*69079
4.69079
4*68981
4.6898]
340*3?
340^37
2-LOS
10-29-75
*188
60»§
28,48
1*177
33. SH
?-*i«7
3: .72
.^ ss ^
.?-.
,99*
G ®0
20,9
0.0
79,1
28,84
28*7?
*?46
.^O
5- .1
12
.29
28.77
37 06
444
23fe» i
827 >
8333
98,6
5757.10
5757.10
08,00
2^88629
2*88629
2.86474
2*86474
204.5*
20^»S^
3-LOJ
10-Z9-75
*188
60. 0
28.4
1 »?98
33,99
77.8
31. -»1
5,4
*2T
.99 •"
0.0
?^»°
0.0
79,, 1
?8.ft%
£8,7''-
,74o
.9 -P
61.1
12
,^a
?8.~*5
2886
4-44
251.6
8597
888?
^ft t "-
2153.60
2153*6^
0,00
i ®&3Q5C
1.03950
1,9056*
1,90564
76.59
T6.59
                                  36

-------
                          TABLE A-13  (Continued)

                       PARTlCUtftTE           DATA
ON
TT
VM
TM
VMSTO
VW
MO
P02
PCO
PNZ
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
V5
AS
«AM
OS
OA

MF
HT
1C
CAM
CAO
CAT
CAU
   DESCRIPTION

0«TE Of W'

      TIP DIAMETER
NET TIME Of SUM
BAROMETRIC
dV6 ORIFICE PRES
VOL ORT G*S-M£TE«
AVS SA?
VOL DWY G»S-STD CONO
TOTiL H^O COLLECTED
VOL H?0 VAPO&-STD CQNQ*
        MOISTURE -Y VOL
MOLE FRACTrON DRV GAS
PERCENT cos RY VOL. DRY
        02 F-Y V0>,» DRY
        CO -Y VOL* DRY
PERCENT N2 f¥ VOL » O^Y
MOLECULAR «
6 .0
12
»?**
28.64
?949
444
257.2
8722
9 -a?
98. >
1230.40
1230,49
0.00
• SS?*^
,587.54
.56394
.56394
43. S9
4.1.89
,99'
Q*§
20.9
0.0
79. 1
28*34
28*74
.8-8
1,587
56.0
lo
. S9
23,36
4308
.'3
11. -
374
388
99. v
14&0*BO
I460sfl0
0,00
*46905
,46905
.45ZS7
^45257
us--
1.5',
* 9rt ••
0,0
?()„ Q
0.0
79. I
28,8*
28.69
.746
,832
6 3. -;
! 2
.29
28,, .1
?M3
444
2%4,5
8 "8**
8- 33
97,7
Ifi3<»,90
i*»39.90
0,00
,S485i>
.§486^'
. 7^5 ' 5
.795:5
S 8 . 8 "<
58. 8^
                                  3?

-------
                         A-13  (Continued)

                 PANICULATE          DATA
ON
TT
PB
PM
VH
TM
VMSTO
VW
VWV

MO
P02
PCO
MWO
OPS
TS
MP
PST
PS
VS
AS
GS
OA

HF
MT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAX
   DESCRIPTION             UNITS

DATE OF  RUN

       TIP  DIw-*ETEft            IN
NET TfME 0? RUN              M1M
BAROMETRIC                 IN.HG
AVG ORIFICE               IM.H2Q
VOL DRY  655-METER            OCP
AVG GAS       TEHP         PE6.F
VOI, DRY  S^S-STD
TOTAL  ^20  COLLECTED           ML
VOi H?0  ¥AP0«~;T
AVS STK  VELOCITY          IN.H20
AVS STA'  •*  TEMPERATURE      OE8,F
NET ?;.Mf»» INS POINTS
STATIC. PRUS OF STACK       IN. MS
STACK  PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE   IhUHG
AVG STACK SAS VELOCITY       FPH
STACK  A">t"A                   IN2
ACTUAL STACK FLOWft4TK     M3/MIN
STK FLOWR'.TE* DRYfSTD CN   OSCfM
ACTUAL -sTAC^. FLC^RATE       ACFM
PERCENT  I^QKlMfETlC
PARTICULATE wT-PARTIAL        MS
F-^RTICUtATE WT-TOTAL          MG
     I«fP!NGeft C* TCH
PART.  LOAO-PTL.STO CN   8^/OSCF*
PART,  LOaO-TTL.STO C«
PAf?T9  LOAD-PTL.STy CN     6R/ACF
PAffT«  LOAO-TTL.ST-' CN     SR/ACF
PARTIC EM1S-PARTIAL        L8/HR
PARTIC -MIS-TOTAL          LB/HR
7-ev»
i 0-3 1-75
.ia<
60«0
27. 74
«4i2
22.08
7E.3
20.41
= .7
*?7
1.3
.987
0*0
20 »9
0*0
79.1
28,
0.0
79,1
Z8.7
.74%
«i23
66,^
12
28,00
279^
44*
24 :i . •
863°
as .•--
97»?
30f9.3'>
30^-9^30
0^00
1.60158
1.60158
1,49-64
1 .49' 64
109. «»3
109^3
                            38

-------
   TABLE A-13  (Concluded)



PARTICULATE           DATA
NAME

ON
TT
PB
PM
VM
TM
VWSTD
v«
VW¥
PMOS
MO
peo2
PO2
PCO
PN2
MWO
MK
CP
OPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
VS
AS
QAM
as
C3A
PERI
NF
HT
1C
CAN
CAO
CAT
CAU
CAW
CAX
DESCRIPTION
DATE Of KU-N
TIP DIMETER
NET TIME OF RUN
BdROf'ETftlC PRESSURE
&VG ORIFI'E
VOt ORY 8*.S-M£TER
A ¥6 GAb METER TEWP
VOt, CRY 6/-S-STO
TOTAL «20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 V".POR-STO
PERCENT MOf^TUwE P-Y VOt,
MOLE FRACTION DRY SAS
C02 <-T92
68*0
12
»2^
2T,^4
2749
444-
239,7
7839
8465
9e«»0
1959.7(1
19-.9.7C
0^00
l.f-4335
1 ®t,4335
.96617
."6617
78.09
TO, 09
11-BVM
10-31-15
a2s.
60^0
2?®6S
,303
18.96
a. ,e
J7»18
4.4
.2
1.2
»988
8*0
20*9
8,0
79.1
28.84
28. tl
.8.18
U116
6^.0
16
» ! 2
27. T7
3658
??
1^.7
643
695
99, G
811,60
811.60
0«00
»72?32
•72732
.673E6
»fr?326
4,01
4.01
u-m*
10-31-75
.188
60.0
2?»6?
1.1M
31 .^fi
93.**
28*3^
1 '.
»4-
1,7
.98-
0,0
29,°
0«0
79,1
28.84
28, 6K-
«,746
^ ?oS
66,0
12
.2'^
^7 ,94
27, ,7
444
23^. '
7ft8 '
3336
9B.P
2289*6-1
2289.60
0,00
1.24368
1^24368
1.1459!
1.14591
81. 8*
Si, 8'-

-------
                             A-14

                PART1CULATE EMISSION DATA
                       (METRIC RESULTS)
NA"»*E
ON
TT
PS
PM
V«
TW
VMSTM
¥^
VWM

MO

P02
PCO
PN2
MWO
H^
CP
DPS
TSM
Hf
PST
PS
VSH
AS
QSM

HF
MT
ic
   DESCRIPTION

DATE OF RUN

      TIP D
NET T1HE OF
BAROMETRIC
&VG ORIFICE      DROP
VOL DRY G.iS-METER
4VG GAS
VOL DRY SftS-STD
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 V«P0«-5TD COND
PERCEMT NOISTUPE «ty VOL
MOLE FRACTION ORf GAS
        COS BY VOL « DRY
PERCENT 02 '••¥ VOL, DRY
PERCENT CO f-y VOL. DRY
PERCENT N2 --»r VOL» 0»Y
MOLECULAR irfT-DRY STK GAS
WOLECUL^S WT-STK GAS
PITOT TU^E: COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVS STAC*. TEMPERATURE
NET SAMPLING f»OJNTS
ST4T1C      Of STACK
STACK           ABSOLUTE
AVS STACK 6AS VELOCITY
STACK AS-EA
ACTUAL
STK FLOwRiTEt ORY»$TQ
PARTICULATE
PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
CAUM

CAXM
PART, LOAO-PTL.STO CM
      LOAO-TTL^STO CN
      LOAD-PTL.STK CN
PART. LOAD-TTUSTK CN
PART1C fMIS-PARTlAl.
PAfiTIC F.MIS-TOTAt
UNITS

IN
»IH
IN.H6
!N^H20
DCF

NCM
ML
NMJ









!N^H20
DEQ.C

IM.HS
!M*HG
M/MIN
IN>
M3/MIN
NM3/MIM

MO
M<3

M*i/NM3
M<>/NM3
MP/H3
M-VM3

-------
                        A-14 (Continued)

                PARTICUl ATE          DATA
                       {METRIC RESULTS)

          DESCRIPTION
04TE OF
ON           TIP  DIAMETER
IT     NET TIME OF  »UN
P8     B/-R01- ETR1C
?>M     AVG ORIFICE
VM     VOL DRY GAS-METER
TW     AVS GAS        TEMP
¥«STM  VOL DRY CUS-STD
VW     TOTAL H?0  COLLECTED
VWM    VOL «20 ¥ftPOR~STD CONP
       PERCENT MOISTURE «4y  VOL
MO          FRaCTlON  DRY C5AS
               COE  £Y VOL*  D»Y
P02            02 RY  VOL^ DRY
PCO    PERCENT CO !-Y  VOLt DRY
FN2    PERCENT N2 -f  VOL* ORY
MWO    MOLECULAR  i«T-ORY ST«, r,AS
MU     MOLECULAR  WT-ST", 6AS
CP     PITOT TUPE COEFFICIENT
OPS    AVQ STK VELOCITY HEAD
TSM    AV6 STACK  TEMPERATURE
MP     NFT S/'MPl INS POINTS
f»ST    STATIC PRF.S  OF STACK
PS     STACK PRESSURE* ABSOLUTE
VSW    A¥G STACf?  GAS  vetOClTY
AS     STACK A-'fA
OAH    ACTUAL STACK FLOrtRATE
OSM    STK FLO'^RnTE*  ORYiSTD CN
       PERCENT XSOKINETIC
MF     PA^TICULATE  KT-PARTIAL
MT     PARTICUl ATE  ^T-TOTAL
1C          1MPINGER  CATCH
CAN«   PART, L0AD-PTL.STD CN
CAOM   PART* LOAD-TTL«STD CN
CATM   PART* LOAD-PTLfSTK CH
CAUM   PA«T, LOAO-TTL'.STf CM
       PA»T1C SMIS-PARTIAL
CAXK   PARTIC EWIS-TOTAL
                          UNITS
                              IN
                           IN.HG
                          1N.H20
                            OCF
                           OE0.F
                            NCM
                              ML
                          M/MJN
                             IN2
                         W3/MIN
                         MM3/MIM
                         MO/NM3
                         MG/NM3
                          MG/M3
                          MQ/M3
                          K6/HR
   a ea
   60*0
  28,35
  1.338
  35.32
   91, A
    .91
    5,5
    .01

   ,992
    0.0

    0.0
   79.1
  28, 64
  2S.75
   17,8
     12

  28.64
  898.9
    4*4
  257*2
  247*0
   98 ^ y
1230.40
1230*4-0
   0^09
13*3»«1
1343*81
1290^48

iO-30-TS
.186
60.0
28.' 7
2.262
5'- .93
73, r
1,36
.01
.9
,99>
0,0
0*0
79.1
28.84
28,74
®§"?8
use?
13.3
28.36
1313.1
! 3
11 *
10,6
99.-^
1468. BO
1460,30
0® 00
1073,36
1*73.36
1035.62
1335,62:
,602
.682
6- OW
10-31-75
,188
€0*0
?7»74
1,187
32*25
74,2
.6
.'Hi
1 . ^
.98 •
0.0
0,0
79» 1
?8.tt^
B8.69
.746
®d3?
17,2
29,'' 3
654^4
444
244,5
22U® 1
97,7
1639^90
1639.90
0,00
19*1. rtT
1941,8?
1819^58
- 1819, SB
26^^^^
26.68'.
                             41

-------
                           TABLE A-14  (Continued)

                       PART1CULATE           DATA
                              CMETRIC RESULTS!
CP
OPS
TSH
MP
PST
PS
VSM
AS
OAH
QS«

MF
MT
1C
          DESCRIPTION

       PATE OF RUN

ON           TIP DIVETEft
TT     NET TIME OF RtJW
PS     BAHQNETRIC
PM     AVG ORIFICE PRES  OPOP
VM     VOL DRY GAS-METER CONO
TM     AVS GAS METER TEMP
       VOL OPY SAS-STO
¥¥     TOTAL H30 COLLECTED
VW    VOL H2Q VtPOR-STD CONO
               MOISTURE  ?Y  VOL
m          FRACTION DRY QAS
               COS BY VOL»  DRY
P02    PERCENT 02 «Y VOLt DRY
'PCO    PERCENT CO ^Y VOLt DPY
PN2    PERCENT N2 '4Y VOL » DRY
       MOLECULAR wT-ORY  STK GAS
       MOLECULAR wT-SIX  6AS
       PITOT TU&E COEFFICIENT
       AVG STK VELOCITY  HEAD
       A¥G STACK TEMPERATURE
       NET SAMPLING POINTS
       STATIC      OF STACK
       STACK PRESSURE t ABSOLUTE
       AVS STACK GAS VELOCITY
       STACK Af^EA
       ACTUAL. STAC^ FLOWRAT*'
       STi FLOW^ATE* ORVtSTO CN
               !>ORIN£TIC
       PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
       PA«TICUIATE WT-TOTAL
       PERC IMPIN/SER CftTCH
             tOAD-PTuSTD CN
             LOAD-TfL*STD CM
             LOAO-PTL.STK CN
CAUM   PAST* LOAO-TTL.STK CM
CAWM   PARTIC EMIS-PARTlAL
CAXM   PASTIC CMIS-TOTA*.
       PART
       PAr
0.0
79,1
28,34
23.?^
. ?4*j
.823
19.?
12
.2*
28*00
8SU7
444
243, •'
22b»8
97.8
30f-9«3Q
30f 9,30
0*00
3664^96
3664,96
3411,00
3411.0°
49.86*
49,86*

-------
                    TABLE A-14  (Concluded)

                 ^ARTICULATE           OAT*
                               RESULTS)

ON
TT
PI
PF
VM
TH
VMSTW
MO
PC02
P02
PCO
PN2
OPS
TSW
NP
PST
PS
¥SM
AS
QAM
wr
MT
1C


CATM
   DESCRIPTION

   E OF
       TIP  01A-ETER
NET T!«£ Of  RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
.4V6 ORIFICE
VOL DRY GaS-METER
ftVG GAS
VOL DRY G^S-STD  CONO
TOTAL  H30  COLLECTED
¥OL *20 V'iPO^-STO
        MOISTUPE ?Y VOL
     FRACTION  DRY  GAS
PERCENT C02  RY VOL.
PCTCENT 02 ^Y  VOL»
PERCENT CO ^Y  ¥OL»
PERCENT M3 PY  VOL * DHY
MOLECULAR  WT-OftY STK. GAS
MOLECULA»  WT-STK GAS
PITOT  TU*-E coeFFicie.vT
AVG ST". VELOCITY HE&0
AV8 STACK  TEMOERATURC
-N€T SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC P'-ES  OF STACK
STACK  PRESSURE.  ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK  GAS  VELOClTf
UM1TS

IN
MIN
XN.HG
IN.HZG
OCF
HES.F
NCM
ML
MM3








IN.H20
0EG*C

1 --T8M
10-31-T5
,188
6S»0
27.65
1.131
32*59
93*S
• 8?
" *4
.01
1.2
.988
0.0
20.9
0,0
79,1
28,84
28.71
.792
20.0
12
11-8VM
10-31-75
»12S
80«,Q
2T»65
»3C3
1 .96
O ft O
-.49
4,4
.01
1*2
4.988
0,0
30,9
0,0
79.1
28*84
28,11
llliG
1^.3
16
12-THM
10-31-75
.188
60. 0
27 .^^
1 . 1 n 1
31.06
V'l.fl
®fti
1 .3
»al
1 „ r
.98
0.0
20 »**
0*0
79. 1
28.84
28. r.
.7^8
20*')
12
    M/HIN
                     D«YfSTD
CAXM
ACTUAL  STAC-C
STK FLO^R*T£
         ISOx
PARTICULATF:
^ARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
PERC  I^PINGER  C^TCH
      LOAO-PTL^STO CN
      LOAO-TTL*STD CM
PART. LGAP-PfLtST* CM
PA«T. LOAO~TTL»ST* CN
PARTIC  EM1S-PARTIAL
PftRTIC  PHIS-TOTAL
   M3/MIN
CN NM3/M1N

       MG
       HP

   M6/NM3
   H3/NM3
    KG/143
    fCB/HR
    K6/HP
  837*8
    444
  339*?
  222,3
   0*00
2387,54
                         Z7.77
   19^7
   18,2
   99.0
 811,60
 an.60
   o.os
 31.793
 31.793
1540*65
1540.65
  1,819
  1.819
  27.*4
  825. •
    44*

  21^1-
22H9.60
   0.00
2845^96
2622.23
2622.23
 37.131
 37.131
                            43

-------
                               TABLE A-15

                                 OF Rt SUITS
                                 UNITS
                                  OSCt-
                                 OSCFM
          DESCRIPTION

       DATE OF HUN

       VOL DRY GOS-STO
       PERCENT MOISTURE r>Y VOi
TS     AV6 STACK TEMPERATURE
US     STK FLOMR'TEt DRYtSTQ  CN
QA     ACTUAL STACK PlOWRATE
       PERCENT ISOKIMET1C
PART1CULATES — PARTIAL CATCH

MF     PARTlCULATl7 WT-PARTIAL       MG
CAN    PART* iOAO-PTLfSTD CN   r»R/OSCf
CAT    PART, LGAD-PTUSTK CM    6«/ACF
CAW    PARTIC EMIS~PARTIAL       LB/HR

PARTICOI.ATES — TOTAL CATCH

WT     PARTICULATf WT-TOTAL         Mr
CAO    PART, LOAD-TTL»STO CN   GR/OSCf
CAU    PART. LOAD-TTL,STK CM    6R/ACF
CAX    PAftTIC t-MIS-TOTAL         L8/HR
1C     PERC U:PIN<;ER CATCH
   1-LOS     2-LOS     3-LOW

10-29-75  10-Ef-TS  10-29-75
31.42
,6
45»'i
8%6?
8*69
98^5
9SIO.OO
4,69019
4*6StS!
340t3T
9510,00
4*69079
4»689il
30,7?
.6
5<" »°l
82 7 \
S333
98,6
5TST.10
2,88629
2*66474>
204.59
5?5?»10
2»flft629
2.&64T4
31.41
«.^
61,1
859?
88S7
98,-*
3153,60
1,03950
1.0056*
16.69
21S3.60
1.03950
1*00564
                                            340,31
                                              C.OO
              §,§0

-------
TABLE A-15  (Continued)




          OF  RfcSUITS
NAME



TS
as
Oft

DESCRIPTION
DATE OF wU'i
VOl DWV O^S-STP
PERCENT MOISTURE H¥ VOl
AV6 STACK
ST* FtOwRATEt 0RY»STO CN
ACTUAL '^TACn FL'^RATE
IsOKXMETlC
UMITS

OSCF





<,-TB*l
IO-29-7i>
32,2?
,»i
64,0
8722
9- 82
98-,:^
5-UVW
I0-30«?5
41^96
.9
56, 0
374
388
99*=,
6- OW
10-31-TS
?9.76
i ,3
6?,«»
ft. 89
'8^:33
97,?
PARTICULARS — PARTIAL CATCH
MF
CAN
CAT
CAM
PARTICULATt, WT-PART1AL"
PART. LOAO-PTL»STD CM
PAST. LOAO-PTLfSTK CM
PARTIC EM1S-PART1AL
H6
68/OSCF
SR/ACF
L8/HR
123§,%0
,58??4
«.56394
43.B9
1460. 80
.4-6905
,,4525?
1,50
1639^90
»S4860
»?95 (5
58.81
PARTfCyiATES • — TOTAL CATCH
MT
CA0
CM
CAX
1C
PARTICUIATC WT-TOTAL
PART, LOAD-TTl.»STD CM
PAKT, tOAO-TTL,STK CN
PAWriC EMIS-TOTAL
tHpINGER Cft 1CH
N6
6W/OSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR

1230.40
»58??4
,5639%
43, a9
0.00
1460.80
,46905
,4525?
KSfi
0,00
1639,90
.8486^
, 7*>5l 5
58*81
O^OC

-------
                         TABLE A-15  (Continued)

                          SUMMARY OF R
NAME      DESCHIPT10M
       GATE OF  RU-S-
UNITS       ?-BVW      8-TBC     9-T8C
        IO-31-T5   10-31-75  10-31-75
VMSTO ¥OL DttY 6ftS-STO CONG-
PMOS
IS
QS
OA
PERI
PART
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
PART
MT
CA0
CAU
CAK
1C
PERCENT MOISTURE l-'Y VOl.
AV6 STACK TEMPERATURE
STK fLO^RATCf DRY.STO CN
ACTUAL ^TACrt FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISOK1NETIC
ICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATK WT-PARTIAL
PART. LO*D-PTL«STD CN
FART^ LOAO-PTttSTK CN
PARTIC FMIS-PARTIAL
ICULATES ~ TOTAL CATCH
PA«TlCULATli WT-TOTAL
PART« LOAO-TTL»STO CN
FART^ LOAO-TTLiSTK CN
FA«T!C FMJS-TC'-TAL
PFRC IMPINGEH CATCH
OSCF

OEO.F




MO
CR/OSCf
6H/ACF
L.8/HR

m
GW/OSCF
GR/ACr
LB/HR

20»*l
1.3
67,0
H60
389
99*4

§93,10
,67403
«6?453
a, 08

893^-0
,67403
,62453
2.08
0*08
2--..U9
1.5
6*>« 0
TftiQ
818?
97,9

e99e^to
1,64391
1 ,52^6"?
107.32

3990,90
1. 64391
1.5296?
1 0? »32
0*00
2t,5l
1.2
66. H
8009
86 '<•"•
97tB

3069.30
1.60158
1 ,49 «' ft 4
109,^3

3Q^9t30
1,60158
1 ,49,i64
109,93
0«,§6

-------
                  TABLE A-15  (Concluded)

                  SUMMARY  OF       TS

   DESCRIPTION
UNITS
DATE OF
VOL DRY 8A5-ST0
PERCENT HOlSTURf :»Y VOl
TS A¥Q STACK TEMPERATURE
OS STf< FLOwRtTEt DRYtSTO CN
QA ACTUAL *-TACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT ISO«!NETIC
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
Mf PARTICULATE WT -PARTIAL
CAN PART. LOAD-PTL,STO CN
CAT PART« LOAO-PTL.STK CN
CM PARTIC F.W1S-PARTIAL
pARTicytAies — TOTAL CATCH
MT PARTICUI^ATt- WT-TOTAL
CAO PART. LOAD-TTL*STO CN
CM PftRT* LOAO-TTL.STK CN
CAK PARTIC twis-TOTAt
1C 1NP!N(JER C".TCH
OSCF

oce.r
OSCFM



MS
6R/OSCF
OH/ACF
LS/HR

M6
GR/DSCF
SP-/ACF
LP/MR


OSCF


OSCFM


10-31-75 •
20.93
1*2
60.0
7839
8465
9P.O
10-31-7S
IT, 18
1.2
6S. 0
643
695
99,0
11-BVM    12-TW
                                                          2S.3H
                                                             1,'f
                                                           6ft, 0
                                                           768
                                    1.04335
                                     .96617
                                      70*09
                                       0.00
                    811.60
                    •T273H
                    ,67326
                       4^01
                       0,00
MS
6R/OSCF
OH/ACF
LS/HR
191>9«TO
1.04335
,9661?
70»09
811.60
t72?32
,67 ;26
*.01
2289.60
U24366
U 1*591
81.8'-
         2289,60
         1,2436B
         1,14591

            §.§0

-------
             TABLE A-16
SUMMARY OF RESULTS—METRIC UNITS
NAME

TSW
§SM
0AM
PERI
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF HUM
VOt DRY fiAS-STfl
PERCENT MGISTURK wy V0|
AV6 STACK TEMPERATURE
STK FLOwRATE* oftY»sTO CM
ACTUAL STACK FLO««AfE
PERCENT ISOKXNETIC
UNITS

NCM
DEG.C
NM3/MIN
M3/MIN
I-LOS
1Q-29-T5
«6
7,7
?39«H
239,8
9ft, 5
2-LOS
10-Z9-75
,870
^6
l'H2
234*2
236. .1
98.6
3-1 Ok-
10-29-75
*9fTi
«H
1 ^ , 2
243,4
2SK6
98. «*•
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
HF
CAWM
PARTI
HT
GA0M
CAUM
CAXM
1C
PAftTICyLATE WT-PAHTIAL
PART. LOAO-PTLtSTD CM
PART« LOAO-PTL-tSTK CM
PA^TIC EMIS-PARTIAL
CULATES « TOTAL CATCH
PAPTICULATF WT-TOTAL
PART. LOAO-TTLtSTD CN
PART, tOAO-TTL»STK CN
PAfffIC t«!S-TOTAL
PERC I^PINGER C/.TCH
MS
M6/NM3
Mf»/M3
K6/HR

H6
M(VNM3
Md/M3
KH/Hft
9570,06
10734.13
10731*68
154.391

9STO.OO
IOT34.13
10T3i»S8
154,391
0,00
5757,10
6604*80
6555-* 49
93. 798

5I5T.IO
6604.80
65S5t49
92* 1-98
0*60
2153,60
2318,73
23»l,E5
34,739

aiS3»6o
23?«^73
23H1.25
34,739
0.00

-------
                   TABLE A-16  (Continued)

             SUMMARY Of RESULTS—METRIC  UNITS
NftME
VMSTM

TSM
QSM
0AM
PERI
   DESCRIPTION

DATE OF HUM
UNITS

VOL DRY C»fiS-STD
PERCENT MOISTURE *Y VOt.
AV6 STAC* TEMPERATURE     0E6*C
STK FLO*RAT£t ORYtSTD CM NM3/MIN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATC
PERCENT ISOKINFTIC
PARTICULATFS — PARTIAL  CATCH

MF     PARTICULAR  WT-PART1AL        M<5
       PART, lQAO-PTt_»STD  CN
CATM   PART^ LOAO-PTL^STi^  CN     HG/M3
CftWM   PART1C EHIS-PftRTlAL       K6/HR

PARTICyLATES — TOTAL  CATCH

MT     PARTICULATt  '-'iT-TOTAL          M6
CAOM   PART. LOAD-TTl. »STO  CN    M^/NM3
CAUM   PART, LOAD-TTL,»STh  CN     M6/M3
CAXM   PART1C EMIS-TOTAL          KG/HR
1C     PERC iMFlNttER CATCH
4-TflW
10-29-75
,914
#«
17,8
247.0
25?, 2
98 »?
1E30.40
1343^81
1290^48
19.910
1230.40
13*3,81
1290*40
19.910
OtOO
5-BVW
10-30-75
U358
,9
13^3
10.6
11.0
99. S
146CU8Q
10?3*36
1035*62
*6S2
1460.80
1073.36.
1035,62
*682
0^00
6-1 OW
10-31-T3
,843
i „"•»
17.2
22^.1
244.5
97,7
1639.10
1941.87
iS!9«5tt
26«6S4
1639.90
1941.87
1819.58
26S68«.
0,60

-------
                                  TABLE A-16  (Continued)

                                   OF  RESULTS—METRIC UNITS
o
              HAHE
              VMSTM
              PWOS
              TSH
              asw
              QAM
              PERI
          DESCRIPTION

       DATE OF
       VOL. OPV G/sS-STD  CONO
               MOISTURE  <;¥  VOi
       AV6 STACK  TEMPERATURE
       STK FUOtriRATE*  OR¥»$TE> f
       ACTUAL STACH FLOWKATE
       PERCENT I*iOKlNETi€
PARTICULATES — PARTIAL  CATCH

MF     PARTICULATF  WT-PAftTlAt
       PART, LOAO-PTLtSTO CN
CATM   PART. LOAD-PTL»STK C11!
CAWM   PARTIC t'MlS-PARTIAL

PARTICULATES — TOTAL  CATCH
MT

CAUM
CAXM
1C
                    «T*TOTAL
             LOAO-TTL.STD  CN
       PART. iOAO-TTL»ST^- CN
       PART 1C fc'MIS-TOTAL
       PE'RC iMPINCiER C.«TCH
                                  UNITS
                                    NCM

                                  DE6.C
                                 NM3/HIN
                                 M3/MIN
                                                   M6

                                                HC./M3
                                                K6/HR
                                                   M6
                                                MC--/M3
                                                KG/HR
r-BVw -
10-31-75
»S?8
1,3
19.4
1C, 2
1UU
99,4
893.10
15*2.40
1429.15
*^44
893,10
i542*4i)
1429.15
.944
G»0§
8-TBC
10-31-75
.196
US
111,3
215,7
231.8
97*9
3761*84
3506,40
4fl,6?9
3761,84
3500.40
48.679
U,0§
9-TMC
10-31-75
.6 -6
1,2
19,2
326, S
243.7
§7*8
30t>9»30
3664,96
341Uuf»
49.864
3069.30
36«i4»9&
3411.0"
49,864
0*00

-------
                    TABLE A-16  (Concluded)

                     OF  RESULTS—METRIC

TSM
OSW
QAM
PERI
          DESCRIPTION

       DATE OF
       VOL DRY GAS-STD  CONO
               MOISTURE H¥ VOl
       A¥6 STACn TEMPERATURE      DES.C
       STK FLO*ft'.T£t DRYtSTO  CM
       ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
       PERCENT ISOKINET1C
                                            I'-TBM    11-8VM    12-TBH

                                          10-31-75  10-31*75  10-31-7S
PARTICIPATES — PARTIAL CATCH

MF     PARTI CUt, ATff WT-PART1AL
       PART* tGAD-PTLtSTO  CN
       PART, LOAO-PTL»ST^  CN
CAWM   PART1C f MIS-PARTIAL

PARTICUI.ATES — TOTAL CATCH
MT
CAOH
CAUM
CAKM
1C
             LOAO-TTt«STD  CM
       PART^ LOAO-TTLtSTlt  CN
       PART1C EM1S-TOTAL
       PERC IwPlNC4£R CAICH
                                  MG/M3
                                  K(}/HR
                                 M«t/NM3
                                  Mfi/«3
                                  KG/HH
,819
1.2
20,0
222»-
239.7
6jL? fi
| Qii^, C| *T f|
a38T»§4
2210,42
31,793
19S9.70
?3RT,54
2210,^?
31.793
Q8 §0
,487
1,2
lf»3
18,2
19,7
SH.60
1684,3?
IS4§.§5
1,819
811.60
1 f»&«*-»37
1S4Q.6S
1,819
0,00
,8- 3
1,7
20,0
217,'
236,"

,2845,96
2622«?3
3T*13!
2289,60
28*5,96
2622,23
37.131
8,00

-------
     B

52

-------
                              PASTICULATE  CALCULATIONS




1.  VOLUME OF DRY SAS  SAMPLED AT           CONDITIONS      tt>



                             P*-, * PM/13«t>»
                  17.71* 32,59*128*44*  1*215/13*6)
              *»   •s^f^«^am,a^fm^^^mxmiS£&.  «tst* tara «-'      "S "  &'*3SriO1'J"*
              "*    ^-^w^w*^^^^^ «™ ^^M™^^™*™^^™^^^^.^™™^^^ —      ^ a 4 ^ iC U av r

                           64*2*46 •*


              3   V«STO*0, 028317-   31 •42«0*02B317*        .89 DNM3




^.   VOLUHE OF WATER        AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
        VWV   at  0^04?4«VM  a 0.04?4»    4,0      -        ,19 5CF


                               =    »190»6.0?93l?  =      ,0034 N<>3
3*  PERCENT WOISTURE  IN  STACK SAS
                                  100.«
                                  ««„«

                                  31,42
    MOLE  FRACTIOM OF  ORr  STACK GAS
                  { 0,0  »  44/100) *  I30.9 * 32/100)
                      *<79.1  * 28/1001
                      100,               100,
5,           HOLECULAR  w€ISHT Of DRY  STAC.X GAS


              *   <«»r.02  *  44/100) *  (PQ?  * 32/100)
                                -* 29/100)

-------
6,  MOLECULAR        OF  STACK  GAS


        MM    =         *  I8*tl-MD)

              *   28»8» ,994  *  18*U~ .9941       s      28»?7


7.  STACK  GAS VELOCITY AT STACK  CONDITIONS


        VS     a  51E9*CP»ftSQRT{0PS»fTS**6ft) )»
                        .7*6 «  2-
                    *SQRT»aw««i*^««»Mi9.«w*s,^
                  17*71 # PS *
                  17. 71*28. 7.S*  .994

                                        0. §38317  =        24« NM3/M1N
                                  54

-------
10,  PERCENT. ISOKIfCTlC



                  1032*{TS+4*jO)*V«STr-
       OCOT   -  ««,»•,«..,_«,•,«,...,«_.,,__.__.__.«,,
       "^ I » ™ 4   **  ™*r™™™"™"H"*<'""('e"'B>™t'*™'™'fca™*(*«°«iw*»»**««»'««»**»««»«
                  VS*TT*PS»»-»D*
                          60*0»a8*
                                            * ,188
11,  PARTICUtATE LOAD1M6 —         CYCLONE*
                       CAT STANOA«0 CONDITIONS)
       CAN-   =  0*0154 «  
-------
14.  PART1CULATE LOADING « TOTAL
                                 CONDITIONS!
                  I?»?1*CAO«PS*«0
       CAU   *  —«—.—. -,--«.
                  IT.n* 4.6908*28.73* .994
              —  >ii»i»«.«*«>lw.<>i.*l«>.>»«>«il«i>i>>_>w«.«.<>^>       —   /i

                          45„9*460


       CAUH  *  CAU«2288.34. «  4.68981*2280,34    »  In731.88
 IS.   PAftTICULATE  EMISSION RATE
                        —         CYCLONE« AND  FILLER
               =   G'.GQSST*  4.6908*    8467         s    340,3?  :


               =   CA^»0,      »   340.37*0.45359    =    154.3*9  K
       PART1CULATE  EMISSION
                        .. TO I it.
         CAX   s   0.008si7»CAO*QS


               =   0^0085?*  4.6908*     8467         a    340.37  L  /


         CAXM  s   CAX»0.4S359 »   340.3?«0,*5359    s    154.19  -"./




  17.  EMISSION FACTOR— TOTAL


        E =
              Tons Grain Handled


         =s 76»6  :=   0*?66  Ib

           100             ton


      EM = (E) X (0.5)


        = (0,766) x  (0,5) =  0.383
                                Mton
                                   56

-------
18.
      KG «= (lb grain) x
         «*          x
         *       kg
 III                           AT 7n  DE8 F  (31.1  OES r.j .        IM MS
          fTM MM H5I
                                    5?

-------