United States       Prevention, Pesticides     EPA712-C-96-234
          Environmental Protection    and Toxic Substances     June 1996
          Agency        (7101)
&EPA   Health Effects Test
          Guidelines
          OPPTS 870.5900
          In Vitro Sister Chromatid
          Exchange Assay
                'Public Draft"

-------
                           INTRODUCTION
     This guideline is one of a series of test guidelines that have been
developed by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
United States Environmental Protection Agency for use in the testing of
pesticides and toxic substances, and the development of test data that must
be submitted to the Agency for review under Federal regulations.

     The Office of Prevention,  Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)
has  developed this guideline through  a  process of harmonization that
blended the testing  guidance and requirements that existed in the Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics  (OPPT) and appeared in Title 40,
Chapter I,  Subchapter R of the Code of Federal Regulations  (CFR), the
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) which appeared in publications of the
National Technical  Information Service (NTIS) and the guidelines pub-
lished by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD).

     The purpose of harmonizing these guidelines into a single set of
OPPTS  guidelines is to minimize variations among the testing procedures
that must be performed to meet the data requirements of the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency under the Toxic  Substances Control Act (15
U.S.C. 2601) and the Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(7U.S.C. I36,etseq.).

     Public Draft Access Information: This draft guideline is part of a
series of related harmonized guidelines that  need to  be considered as a
unit. For copies: These guidelines are available electronically from the
EPA Public Access  Gopher (gopher.epa.gov) under the heading "Environ-
mental Test Methods and Guidelines" or in paper by contacting the OPP
Public    Docket    at    (703)    305-5805    or     by    e-mail:
guidelines@epamail.epa.gov.

     To Submit Comments: Interested persons are invited to submit com-
ments. By mail: Public Docket and Freedom of Information Section, Office
of Pesticide Programs, Field Operations Division (7506C), Environmental
Protection Agency,  401  M  St.  SW.,  Washington, DC 20460. In  person:
bring to: Rm. 1132, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Ar-
lington, VA. Comments may also be submitted  electronically by  sending
electronic mail (e-mail) to: guidelines@epamail.epa.gov.

     Final  Guideline Release: This guideline is available  from the U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 on The Federal Bul-
letin  Board.   By  modem   dial   202-512-1387,   telnet   and  ftp:
fedbbs.access.gpo.gov (IP 162.140.64.19),  or  call 202-512-0132 for disks
or paper copies.  This  guideline is also available electronically in ASCII
and PDF (portable document format) from the EPA Public Access  Gopher
(gopher.epa.gov) under the heading  "Environmental Test Methods and
Guidelines."

-------
OPPTS 870.5900  In vitro sister chromatid exchange assay.
    (a) Scope—(1) Applicability. This guideline is intended to meet test-
ing requirements  of both  the  Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.} and the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601).

    (2) Background. The source materials used in developing this har-
monized OPPTS test guideline are OPPT 40 CFR 798.5900 In Vitro Sister
Chromatid  Exchange Assay and OECD 479 Genetic Toxicology: In Vitro
Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay  in Mammalian Cells.

    (b) Purpose. The sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assay detects the
ability of a chemical to enhance the exchange of DNA between two sister
chromatids of a duplicating chromosome.  The test may be performed in
vitro,  using, for example, rodent  or human cells, or in vivo using mam-
mals,  for example, rodents such as mice, rats and hamsters.

    (c) Definitions.  The definitions in section 3 of TSCA and in 40  CFR
Part 792—Good Laboratory Practice  Standards (GLP) apply to this test
guideline. The following definition also applies to this test guideline.

    Sister  chromatid exchanges  are reciprocal interchanges of the two
chromatid arms within a single chromosome. These exchanges are visual-
ized during the metaphase portion  of the cell cycle and presumably require
enzymatic incision, translocation and ligation of at least two DNA helices.

    (d) Test method—(1) Principle.  Following exposure of cell cultures
to test chemicals,  they are  allowed to  replicate in the presence  of
bromodeoxyuridine  (BrdU), followed by treatment with  colchicine  or
colcemid to arrest cells in a metaphase-like stage of mitosis (ometaphase).
Cells  are then harvested and chromosome preparations made. Preparations
are stained  and metaphase cells analyzed for SCEs.

    (2) Description. In vitro SCE assays may employ monolayer or sus-
pension cultures of established cell lines, cell strains, or primary cell cul-
tures.  Cell  cultures are exposed to test chemical and are  allowed to rep-
licate  in the presence of BrdU. Prior  to harvest, cells are treated  with a
spindle inhibitor (e.g. Colchicine or Colcemid #) to  accumulate cells  in
ometaphase.  Chromosome preparations from  cells  are made, stained and
analyzed for SCEs.

    (3) Cells—(i) Type of cells  used in  the assay. There are a variety
of cell lines or primary cell cultures,  including human cells, which may
be used in  the assay. Established  cell lines and strains should be checked
for Mycoplasma  contamination  and  may be periodically checked for
karyotype stability.

-------
     (ii) Cell growth and maintenance. Appropriate culture  media and
incubation conditions (culture vessels, temperature,  humidity, and CCh
concentration) should be used.

     (4) Metabolic activation. Cells should be exposed to test chemical
both in the presence and absence of an appropriate  metabolic activation
system.

     (5) Control groups—Concurrent controls.  Positive and  negative
(untreated and/or vehicle) controls, with and without metabolic activation,
should be  included in each experiment.

     (6) Test chemicals—(i)  Vehicle.  Test substances may be prepared
in culture media or dissolved or suspended in appropriate vehicles prior
to treatment of the cells. Final concentration of the vehicle  should not
reduce cell viability or growth rate.

     (ii) Exposure concentrations. Multiple concentrations of the test sub-
stance over a range adequate to  define  the  response should be  tested.
Among the criteria to be taken into consideration for determining the upper
limits  of  test  chemical  concentration  are cytotoxicity  and  solubility.
Cytotoxicity of the  test  substance may be altered in the presence of meta-
bolic activation  systems. Cytotoxicity may be evidenced by a  large (e.g.,
75 percent) decrease in the number of cells that  have divided  twice  in
the presence of BrdU.  Relatively insoluble substances should be tested
up to the  limit  of  solubility.  For  freely soluble nontoxic chemicals, the
upper test chemical concentration should be determined on a case by case
basis. When appropriate, a positive response should be confirmed by using
a narrow range of test concentrations.

     (e) Test performance—(1) Established cell lines and strains,  (i)
Prior to use in the assay, cells  should  be  generated  from stock  cultures,
seeded in  culture  vessels at the  appropriate density and incubated  at
37 °C.

     (ii) Cell lines  and  strains should be treated with test chemical both
with and  without metabolic activation  when  they  are in the  exponential
stage of growth. At the end of the exposure period,  cells should be washed
and incubated for two replication cycles in medium  containing BrdU. After
BrdU is added, the cultures should be handled in darkness, under "safe"
(e.g., darkroom) lights,  or in dim  light  from incandescent lamps to mini-
mize photolysis  of BrdU containing DNA. At the end of the BrdU incuba-
tion  period, cells should be fixed and stained for SCE determination. Cul-
tures should be treated  with  a  spindle  inhibitor  (e.g.,  colchicine  or
Colcemid®) 2 h prior to harvesting.

     (2) Human lymphocyte cultures,  (i) For preparation of human lym-
phocyte cell cultures, heparinized or acid-citrate-dextrose  treated  whole
blood  should be added to  culture  medium containing a mitogen, e.g.,

-------
phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and incubated at 37 °C. White cells sedimented
by gravity (buffy  coat) or lymphocytes  which have been purified on a
density gradient such as Ficoll-Hypaque may also be utilized.

     (ii) Cells should be exposed to the  test chemical  during at last two
time intervals, e.g.  Go and S. Exposure  during the Go phase of the cell
cycle should be accomplished by adding the test substance prior to addition
of mitogen. Exposure  during  or after the  first S phase may be accom-
plished by exposing cells 24-30 h after mitosis, under  "safe" (e.g. dark-
room) lights,  or in dim light from incandescent lamps to minimize photoly-
sis of BrdU containing DNA. At the end of the BrdU incubation period,
cells should be fixed and  stained for SCE determination. Cultures  should
be treated with a spindle inhibitor (e.g. colchicine or Colcemid®) 2 h prior
to harvesting.

     (3) Human lymphocyte cultures, (i) For preparation  of human lym-
phocyte cell  cultures,  heparinized or acid-citrate-dextrose treated whole
blood should be  added to culture medium  containing a  mitogen,  e.g.,
phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and incubated at 37 °C. White cells sedimented
by gravity (buffy  coat) or lymphocytes  which have been purified on a
density gradient such as Ficoll-Hypaque may also be utilized.

     (ii) Cells should be exposed to the test chemical during at least two
time intervals, e.g., Go and S. Exposure  during the Go phase of the cell
cycle should be accomplished by adding the test substance prior to addition
of mitogen. Exposure  during  or after the  first S phase may be accom-
plished by exposing cells  24-30 h after mitogen stimulation. After expo-
sure, cells should be washed and then cultured in the absence of the chemi-
cal.

     (4) Culture harvest  time. A single harvest time,  one that yields an
optimal percentage of second division metaphases,  is  recommended.  If
there is reason to  suspect that this is not a representative  sampling time
(which may occur for short-lived, cycle specific chemicals), then  additional
harvest times should be selected.

     (5) Staining method. Staining of slides to reveal SCEs can be per-
formed according to any of several protocols. However, the fluorescence
plus  Giemsa method is recommended.

     (6) Number of cultures. At least  two independent  cultures  should
be used for each experimental point.

     (7) Analysis.  Slides  should be coded before analysis. The number
of cells to be analyzed should be based upon the spontaneous control fre-
quency and defined sensitivity and the  power of the test chosen  before
analysis.  In human lymphocytes,  only  cells containing 46 centromeres
should be analyzed. In established cell lines and strains, only metaphases

-------
containing ±2 centromeres of the modal number should be analyzed. Uni-
form criteria for scoring SCEs should be used.

    (f) Data and report—(1) Treatment of results. Data should be pre-
sented in tabular form, providing scores for both the number of SCEs for
each metaphase and the number of SCEs  per chromosome for each meta-
phase.

    (2) Statistical evaluation. Data should be evaluated by appropriate
statistical methods.

    (3) Interpretation of results,  (i) There are several criteria for deter-
mining a  positive result,  one of which is a statistically significant dose-
related increase in the number of sister  chromatid exchanges. Another  cri-
terion  may be based upon detection of a reproducible and statistically sig-
nificant positive response for at least one of the test substance concentra-
tions.

    (ii) A test substance  which produces neither a statistically significant
dose-related increase in the number of sister chromatid exchanges nor a
statistically  significant and reproducible positive response at any  one of
the test points is considered  not to  induce rearrangements of segments of
DNA  in this system.

    (iii) Both biological  and statistical significance should be  considered
together in the evaluation.

    (4) Test  evaluation, (i) Positive  results in the in vitro SCE assay
indicate that under the test conditions the test substance induces reciprocal
chromatid interchanges in cultured mammalian somatic cells.

    (ii) Negative results indicate that  under the  test conditions the test
substance does  not induce reciprocal chromatid interchanges in cultured
mammalian somatic cells.

    (5) Test  report.  In addition  to the  reporting recommendations  as
specified under 40 CFR part 792, subpart J, the following specific informa-
tion should be reported:

    (i) Cells used, density at time of treatment, number of cell cultures.

    (ii) Methods used for maintenance  of cell cultures including medium,
temperature, and CO2 concentration.

    (iii) Test chemical vehicle, concentration and rationale for the selec-
tion of the concentrations of test chemical used in the assay, duration of
treatment.

    (iv) Details of both  the protocol used  preparation of the  metabolic
activation system and its use in the assay.

-------
     (v) Growth period in BrdU; identity of spindle inhibitor, its concentra-
tion and duration of treatment.
     (vi) Time of cell harvest.
     (vii) Positive and negative controls.
     (viii) Method used to prepare slides for SCE determination.
     (ix) Criteria for scoring SCEs.
     (x) Details of the protocol  used for growth and treatment  of human
cells if used in the assay.
     (xi) Dose-response relationship, if applicable.
     (g) References. The following references should be consulted for ad-
ditional background material on this test guideline.
     (1) Latt, S.A. et al.  Sister chromatid exchanges: a report of the U.S.
EPA's Gene-Tox Program. Mutation Research 87:17-62 (1981).
     (2) [Reserved]

-------