United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA712-C-96-237
Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances June 1996
Agency (7101)
&EPA Health Effects Test
Guidelines
OPPTS 870.6100
Delayed Neurotoxicity of
Organophosphorus
Substances Following
Acute and 28-Day
Exposure
'Public Draft"
-------
INTRODUCTION
This guideline is one of a series of test guidelines that have been
developed by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
United States Environmental Protection Agency for use in the testing of
pesticides and toxic substances, and the development of test data that must
be submitted to the Agency for review under Federal regulations.
The Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)
has developed this guideline through a process of harmonization that
blended the testing guidance and requirements that existed in the Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) and appeared in Title 40,
Chapter I, Subchapter R of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) which appeared in publications of the
National Technical Information Service (NTIS) and the guidelines pub-
lished by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD).
The purpose of harmonizing these guidelines into a single set of
OPPTS guidelines is to minimize variations among the testing procedures
that must be performed to meet the data requirements of the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency under the Toxic Substances Control Act (15
U.S.C. 2601) and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(7U.S.C. I36,etseq.).
Public Draft Access Information: This draft guideline is part of a
series of related harmonized guidelines that need to be considered as a
unit. For copies: These guidelines are available electronically from the
EPA Public Access Gopher (gopher.epa.gov) under the heading "Environ-
mental Test Methods and Guidelines" or in paper by contacting the OPP
Public Docket at (703) 305-5805 or by e-mail:
guidelines@epamail.epa.gov.
To Submit Comments: Interested persons are invited to submit com-
ments. By mail: Public Docket and Freedom of Information Section, Office
of Pesticide Programs, Field Operations Division (7506C), Environmental
Protection Agency, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person:
bring to: Rm. 1132, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Ar-
lington, VA. Comments may also be submitted electronically by sending
electronic mail (e-mail) to: guidelines@epamail.epa.gov.
Final Guideline Release: This guideline is available from the U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 on The Federal Bul-
letin Board. By modem dial 202-512-1387, telnet and ftp:
fedbbs.access.gpo.gov (IP 162.140.64.19), or call 202-512-0132 for disks
or paper copies. This guideline is also available electronically in ASCII
and PDF (portable document format) from the EPA Public Access Gopher
(gopher.epa.gov) under the heading "Environmental Test Methods and
Guidelines."
-------
OPPTS 810.6100 Delayed neurotoxicity of organophosphorus sub-
stances following acute and 28-day exposure.
(a) Scope—(1) Applicability. This guideline is intended to meet test-
ing requirements of both the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.) and the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601).
(2) Background. The source material used in developing this har-
monized OPPTS test guideline are 40 CFR 798.6450 NTE Neurotox
Assay, 40 CFR 798.6540 Acute Delayed Neurotoxicity of
Organophosphorus Compounds, 40 CFR 798.6560 Subchronic Delayed
Neurotoxicity of Organophosphorus Compounds; OPP 81-7 Delayed
Neurotoxicity (Acute)—Hen, OPP 82-5 Subchronic Neurotoxicity: 90-
Day Study, OPP 82-6 28-Day Delayed Neurotoxicity—Hen (Pesticide As-
sessment Guidelines, Subdivision F—Hazard Evaluation; Human and Do-
mestic Animals) EPA report 540/09-82-025, 1982; OECD 418 Acute De-
layed Neurotoxicity of Organophosphorus Substances and OECD 419
Subchronic Delayed Neurotoxicity of Organophosphorus Substances—90-
Day.
(b) Purpose. In the assessment of organophosphorus substances,
(OPs) studies of delayed neurotoxicity using the adult hen as the test ani-
mal and including behavioral observation of gait, histopathological assess-
ment of brain, peripheral nerve, and spinal cord, and neurochemical assess-
ment of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and neurotoxic esterase
(NTE) are needed to identify and characterize these potential effects.
(c) Definitions. The definitions in section 3 of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) and the definitions in 40 CFR Part 792—Good Lab-
oratory Practice Standards apply to this test guideline. The following defi-
nitions also apply to this test guideline.
ED is the effective dose.
LD50 is the median lethal dose.
Neuropathy target esterase (NTE) or neurotoxic esterase is a mem-
brane-bound protein that hydrolyzes phenyl valerate. The inhibition and
"aging" of the phosphorylated NTE, i.e. the covalent binding of the OP
to the enzyme, is highly correlated with the initiation of organophosphorus
induced delayed neurotoxicity (OPIDN). Not all OPs that inhibit NTE
cause OPIDN, but all OPs that cause OPIDN inhibit NTE.
NOEL is the no-observed-effect-level.
NTE activity is operationally defined as the phenyl valerate hydrolytic
activity resistant to paraoxon (diethyl 4-nitrophenyl phosphate) but sen-
sitive to mipafox (jV,jV-diisopropylphosphorodiamido fluoridate) or neuro-
pathic OP ester inhibition.
-------
Organophosphorus induced delayed neurotoxicity (OPIDN) is a neu-
rological syndrome in which limb weakness and upper motor neuron spas-
ticity are the predominant clinical signs; distal axonopathy of peripheral
nerve and spinal cord are the correlative pathological signs, and inhibition
and aging of neurotoxic esterase in neural tissues are the correlative bio-
chemical effects. Clinical signs and pathology first appear between 1 and
2 weeks following exposures that typically inhibit and subsequently age
neurotoxic esterase.
(d) Principle of the test method. The test sequence consists of acute
and 28-day exposure studies. Any significant effects on behavior (delayed
effects), histopathology, or inhibition of NTE in the acute study are suffi-
cient cause to conduct the 28-day study. The test substance is administered
orally to domestic hens that in some cases have been protected from acute
cholinergic effects. The animals are observed for at least 21 days after
the last dose for gait changes and other signs. Neurochemical examination
of selected neural tissues is undertaken on some animals at some times
after exposure. Histopathology of brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerve
are performed at the termination of 21-day observation periods. If the re-
sults of the acute study are completely negative, that is, there are no de-
layed behavioral or histopathological effects, and no significant NTE inhi-
bition, the 28-day study is not required. Otherwise, the 28-day study
should be conducted. In the 28-day study, three exposure levels are used
to describe the dose response curve sufficiently to estimate a reference
dose.
(e) Test procedures—(1) Animal selection. The adult domestic lay-
ing hen (Gallus gallus domesticus), aged 8 to 14 months, is recommended.
Standard size breeds and strains should be employed. Healthy young adult
hens free from interfering viral diseases and medication and without abnor-
malities of gait should be acclimatized to the laboratory conditions for
at least 5 days prior to randomization and assignment to treatment and
control groups.
(2) Housing and feeding conditions. Cages or enclosures which are
large enough to permit free mobility of the hens and easy observation
of gait should be used. Where the lighting is artificial, the sequence should
be 12 h light/12 h dark. Appropriate diets should be administered as well
as an unlimited supply of drinking water. The hens should be weighed
weekly. Any moribund hens should be removed and sacrificed.
(3) Route of administration. Dosage of test substance should nor-
mally be by the oral route, preferably by gavage. Liquids may be given
neat or dissolved in an appropriate vehicle such as corn oil; solids should
be dissolved if at all possible since large doses of solids in gelatin capsules
may significantly impair absorption. Dermal exposures may be the most
significant route of exposure for applicators and for nonfood uses and there
-------
may be important differences in toxicity by this route. Conduct of these
studies by this route may be appropriate and should be considered.
(4) Study design — (i) General. An important consideration for the
design of these studies is prediction of activity based on the structure of
the material and the published literature. Some materials, e.g.
phosphinates, are known to inhibit NTE, but not to be capable of aging
and thus are not expected to cause OPIDN. Many materials have structural
features that will permit inhibition and aging, i.e. ester linkages, and are
of potential concern. Published data are available for many materials and
may be very useful for many aspects of the design and interpretation of
these studies.
(ii) Dose levels and selection. For the acute study, a single exposure
group is required. The acute dose level should be chosen to maximize
the amount of material given to the hens, particularly in cases where some
activity is expected. For the 28-day study, at least three exposure groups
are required in addition to the vehicle control group. Ideally, the data
should be sufficient to produce a dose-effect curve. The use of equally
spaced doses and a rationale for dose selection that will maximally support
detection of dose-effect relations is strongly encouraged. The rationale for
dose selection chosen by the investigator should be explicitly stated. The
following guidance for dose selection is somewhat complex and is not
intended to be followed rigidly.
(A) Acute study. Selection of the dose level for the acute study may
be based on a limit dose or lethal doses and other available data, e.g.
on NTE inhibition.
(7) Levels of test substances greater than 2 g/kg need not be tested.
(2) Lethal doses. Either an LD50 or an approximate lethal dose
(ALD) in the hen may be used to determine the acute high dose. If, from
the preliminary data, cholinergic signs are seen very soon after dosing,
prophylaxis using atropine may be appropriate. Atropine (20 mg/kg, s.c.,
up to every 2 h) should be used to prevent death from acute cholinergic
effects.
(B) 28-day study. (7) Levels of test substances greater than 1 g/
kg need not be tested.
(2) High dose — the high dose selected should be estimated to be suffi-
cient to cause OPIDN or be a maximum tolerated dose based on the acute
data, but not result in an incidence of fatalities that would prevent a mean-
ingful evaluation of the data.
Low dose — the low dose should be estimated to be a minimum
effect level, e.g. an ED 10, or alternatively, a NOEL.
-------
(4) The intermediate dose level should be equally spaced between
the high and low doses.
(5) Intermediate responses in NTE i.e. greater than 15 percent and
less than 70 percent, can be crudely extrapolated as if the dose-response
were a simple first order relationship. That is, if a certain dose caused
50 percent inhibition, twice that dose might cause 75 percent inhibition.
Such extrapolation is very crude but can be useful in giving some guidance
for dose estimation.
(iii) Numbers of animals. Exposure groups should be large enough
to provide six survivors for both behavioral observations and
histopathology. At least three hens are required for determination of NTE
in each dose or control group and at each time point.
(iv) Control groups. A positive control group of at least six hens
treated with a known delayed neurotoxicant, such as tri-ort/zo-cresyl phos-
phate (TOCP), is required for both acute and 28-day studies. This group
may be a concurrent or historical control group. (This should also include
at least three hens assessed for biochemical measurements.) Periodic
redeterminations of the sensitivity of the assays is suggested, for historical
control data, i.e. when some essential element of the test conduct by the
performing laboratory has changed. A concurrent control group sufficient
to provide six survivors for histopathology and three hens for NTE meas-
urement are treated in a manner identical to the treated groups, except
that administration of the test substance is omitted. When protective agents
are used, all members of the dose groups and vehicle controls should re-
ceive the same treatment.
(5) Study conduct—(i) Biochemical measurements—(A) NTE
assay. The test method is a differential assay of the ability of neural tissue,
following OP exposure, to hydrolyze a phenyl valerate substrate selec-
tively. The principle of the assay is first to determine the amount of hy-
drolysis that occurs in the presence of a nonneurotoxic inhibitor, paraoxon,
(a), which is intended to occupy irrelevant sites, and second to determine
the activity in the presence of paraoxon and a known neuropathic inhibitor,
mipafox, (b). NTE activity is the difference between (a) and (b), that is,
the proportion of activity inhibited only by mipafox. Thus, the ' 'mipafox
site" is already occupied following exposure to a neuropathic OP ester
and the activity of (b) is therefore reduced.
(7) Three hens from each group should be sacrificed at 48 h after
the last dose. Depending on the duration of acute signs as an indication
of the disposition of the test material, the time for sacrifice for NTE and
AchE assessment may be chosen at a different time to optimize detection
of effects. Both the brain and spinal cord should be prepared for assay
of NTE. Perform duplicate assays of NTE in brain and spinal cord of
three birds from each group and control group.
-------
(2) Materials. This assay requires paraoxon, mipafox, and phenyl val-
erate, all of which can be obtained commercially.
The assay has four stages: Preparation of tissue, differential
preincubation, hydrolysis of substrate, and measurement of product. The
quotations that follow are from Johnson under paragraph (g)(7) of this
guideline as corrected or modified in paragraph (g)(9) of this guideline.
His is the best known method for conduct of this assay. Other acceptable
methods, which primarily involve minor technical modification, have been
used (see paragraphs (g)(13) and (g)(14) of this guideline).
* * * the whole brain (is) removed and cooled in ice-cold buffer (50 mM
Tris/0.2 mM EDTA adjusted to pH 8.0 at 25 °C with HC1). Meninges and blood
vessels are rapidly removed and the brain is blotted dry, weighed, and homog-
enized thoroughly in ice-cold buffer (at a volume of at least 1:30, W/V), using
a high-speed rotating perspex pestle with not more than 0.25 mm difference
in diameter between pestle and tube.
Paired samples of homogenate (equivalent to about 6.0 mg tissue) are
preincubated in Tris/EDTA buffer pH 8 at 37 °C for exactly 20 min with
paraoxon (40 to 100 |iM) plus either (a) buffer or (b) mipafox (50 |iM) in a
final volume of 2 mL.
After preincubation, dispersion (2 mL) of phenyl valerate is added and the
incubation is continued for exactly 15 min. The dispersion is prepared by adding
a solution of Triton X-100 (0.03 percent in water) (30 vol) to a solution of
phenyl valerate (15 or 20 mg/mL) in redistilled dimethylformamide (1 vol) and
mixing thoroughly (by swirling): other solvents give less satisfactory dispersions.
Reaction is stopped by adding 2 mL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (1-2 percent
W/V) in buffer containing 4-aminoantipyrine (otherwise known as 4-amino-
phenazone) (0.25 percent).
This assay is based on the colorimetric determination of liberated phenol.
The coupling of phenol liberated in the assay with the aminoantipyrine may be
performed at any convenient time after quenching the enzyme: 1 mL of
KsFe(CN)6 (0.4 percent in water) is added and the stable red colour is read
at 490 nm.
A nontissue blank, kept to 10 percent of the paraoxon tube value by main-
taining the substrate phenol-free, should be included in each group of assay
tubes. Typical control absorbance values would be 0.8 for paraoxon, 0.35 for
paraoxon and mipafox and 0.07 for the blank. Colour development takes
1-2 min in solutions stopped with sodium dodecyl sulphate. The extinction coef-
ficient of phenol under these conditions is 15,600 at a wavelength of 490 nm.
NTE activity is represented by the difference in absorbance obtained from sam-
ples incubated under conditions (a) and (b) respectively.
Under standard conditions NTE hydrolyzes about 2,400 nmol substrate/
min/g of cortex, 550 for spinal cord, and 100 for sciatic nerve.
(B) AChE measures. Assay of acetylcholinesterase in the brains of
the same birds (according to paragraphs (g)(3) and (g)(4) of this guideline)
should also be performed. The level of AChE inhibition is a useful index
of lethal potency and the ratio of lethal potency to NTE inhibitory potency
can be useful for subsequent dose selection.
-------
(ii) 21-Day observation. All remaining hens should be carefully ob-
served at least once daily for a period of at least 21 days until 21 days
after the last dose and signs of toxicity recorded, including the time of
onset, degree, and duration. Observations should include, but not be lim-
ited to, behavioral abnormality, locomotor ataxia, and paralysis. At least
twice a week the hens should be taken outside the cages and subjected
to a period of forced motor activity, such as ladder climbing, in order
to enhance the observation of minimal responses. A rating scale of at least
four levels should be used to grade ataxia (see paragraph (g)(12) of this
guideline).
(iii) Necropsy and histopathology. (A) Gross necropsies are rec-
ommended for all survivors and should include observation of the appear-
ance of the brain and spinal cord. All animals should be prepared for mi-
croscopic examination. Tissues should be fixed by whole body perfusion,
with a fixative appropriate for the embedding media. Sections should in-
clude medulla oblongata, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves. The spinal
cord sections should be taken from the rostral cervical, the midthoracic,
and the lumbosacral regions. Section of the proximal regions of both of
the tibial nerves and their branches should be taken. Sections should be
stained with appropriate myelin- and axon-specific stains.
(B) For 28-day studies, a stepwise examination of tissue samples is
recommended. In such a stepwise examination, sections from the high dose
group are first compared with those of the control group. If no
neuropathological alterations are observed in samples from the high dose
group, subsequent analysis is not required. If neuropathological alterations
are observed in samples from the high dose group, samples from the inter-
mediate and low dose groups are examined sequentially.
(f) Data reporting and evaluation—(1) Test report. In addition to
any other applicable reporting requirements, the final test report must in-
clude the following information:
(i) Toxic response data by group with a description of clinical signs;
the criteria for the grading system for ataxia and any other scales should
be defined.
(ii) For each animal, time of death during the study or whether it
survived to termination.
(iii) The day of the first occurrence of each abnormal sign and its
subsequent course including its degree.
(iv) Body weight data.
(v) Necropsy findings for each animal, including a description of the
appearance of the brain and the spinal cord.
-------
(vi) Biochemical data for each animal assessed, including absorbance
values for each animal tested, and blank sample data.
(vii) A detailed description of all histopathological findings.
(viii) Statistical treatment of results, where appropriate.
(2) Treatment of results. Data may be summarized in tabular form,
showing for each test group the number of animals at the start of the test,
the number of animals showing lesions or effects, the types of lesions
or effects and the percentage of animals displaying each type of lesion
or effect.
(3) Evaluation of results. The findings of these delayed neurotoxicity
studies should be evaluated in terms of the incidence and severity of be-
havioral, neurochemical, and histopathological effects and of any other ob-
served effects in the treated and control groups, as well as any information
known or available to the authors, such as published studies. For a variety
of results seen, further studies may be necessary to characterize these ef-
fects.
(g) References. The following references should be consulted for ad-
ditional background information on this test guideline:
(1) Caroldi, S. and Lotti, M. Neurotoxic Esterase in Peripheral Nerve:
Assay Inhibition, and Rate of Resynthesis. Toxicology and Applied Phar-
macology 62: 498-501 (1982).
(2) Davis, C.S. and Richardson, R.J. Organophosphorus compounds.
In: Experimental and Clinical Neurotoxicology, P.S. Spencer and H.H.
Schaumberg, Eds., Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 527-544 (1980).
(3) Ellman G.L. et al. A new and rapid colorimetric determination
of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochemical Pharmacology 7:88-95
(1961).
(4) Johnson, C.D. and Russell, R.L. A rapid, simple, radiometric assay
for cholinesterase, suitable for multiple determinations. Analytical Bio-
chemistry 64:229-238 (1975).
(5) Johnson, M.K. Organophosphorus esters causing delayed neuro-
toxic effects: Mechanism of action and structure/activity studies. Archives
of Toxicology 34:259-288 (1975)
(6) Johnson, M.K. The delayed neuropathy caused by some
Organophosphorus esters: Mechanism and challenge. Critical Reviews in
Toxicology 3:289-316 (1975)
(7) Johnson, M.K. Improved Assay of Neurotoxic Esterase for
Screening Organophosphates for Delayed Neurotoxicity Potential. Archives
of 'Toxicology 37: 113-115(1977).
-------
(8) Johnson, M.K. Delayed neurotoxicity tests of organophosphorus
esters: a proposed protocol integrating neuropathy target esterase (NTE)
assays with behaviour and histopathology tests to obtain more information
more quickly from fewer animals, Proceedings of the International Con-
ference on Environmental Hazards of Agrochemicals in Developing Coun-
tries, Alexandria, Egypt, November 8-12, 1983; Volume I, pp. 474-493.
(9) Johnson, M.K. The target for initiation of delayed neurotoxicity
by organophosphorus esters: biochemical studies and toxicological applica-
tions, E. Hodgson, J.R. Bend, and R.M. Philpot, eds., Reviews in
Biochememical Toxicology 4, 141-212. Elsevier, NY (1982).
(10) Johnson, M.K. and Richardson, R.J. Biochemical Endpoints:
Neurotoxic Esterase Assay. Neurotoxicology 4:311-320 (1983).
(11) Kayyali, U.S. et al. Neurotoxic Esterase (NTE) Assay: Optimized
conditions based on detergent-induced shifts in the phenol/ 4-
aminoantipyrine chromophore spectrum. Journal of Analytical Toxicology
15:86-89.
(12) Roberts, N.L. et al. Screening acute delayed and subchronic
neurotoxicity studies in the hen: Measurements and evaluations of clinical
signs following administration of TOCP. Neurotoxicology 4:263-270.
(13) Soliman, S.A. et al. Species Susceptibility to Delayed Toxic Neu-
ropathy in relation to in vivo inhibition of Neurotoxic Esterase by Neuro-
toxic Organophosphorus Ester. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental
Health 9:189-197 (1982).
(14) Sprague, G.L. et al. Time course for neurotoxic esterase activity
in hens given multiple diisopropyl fluorophosphate injections.
Neurotoxicology 2:523-532 (1981).
8
------- |