United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-01-013
November 2001
Air
JyEPA Quality Assurance Report
Calendar Year 2000
The SLAMS PM2 5
Ambient Air
Monitoring Program
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
EPA-454/R-01-013
November 2001
Qality Assurance Report
Calendar Year 2000
The SLAMS PM2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program
Monitoring and Quality Assurance Group
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
RTF, NC 27711
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
Foreword
This document is available on hardcopy as well as accessible as a PDF file on the Internet under the
Ambient Monitoring Technical Information Center (AMTIC) Homepage
(http://www.epa. gov/ttn/amtic/pmqa.html). The document can be read and printed using Adobe Acrobat
Reader software, which is freeware that is available from many Internet sites (including the EPA web
site). Hardcopy versions are available by writing or calling:
OAQPS Library
MD-16
RTP,NC27711
(919)541-5514
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
Abstract
This report documents the quality assurance activities that were undertaken for the SLAMS PM2.5
environmental data operations for the calendar year January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 (CYOO),
which was the second year of implementation of the PM2 5 monitoring program. The QA Report
evaluates the adherence to the quality assurance requirements described in 40 CFR 58 App. A and
evaluates the data quality indicators of precision, accuracy, bias, and completeness.
The criteria pollutant defined as particulate matter is a general term used to describe a broad class of
substances that exist as liquid or solid particles over a wide range of sizes. As part of the Ambient Air
Quality Monitoring Program, EPA measures two particle size fractions: those less than or equal to [a
nominal] 10 micrometers, and those less than or equal to [a nominal] 2.5 micrometers, hereafter referred
to as PM10 or PM2 5 respectively. In general, the measurement goal of the PM2 5 Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring Program is to estimate the concentration, in units of micrograms per cubic meter (|ig/m3), of
particulates less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers ([im) that have been collected on a 46.2mm
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter. For the State and Local Air Monitoring Network (SLAMS), the
primary goal is to compare the PM2 5 concentrations to the annual and 24-hour National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). The national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for
PM2.5 are 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ( |ig/m3) annual arithmetic mean concentration and 65
|ig/m3 24-hour average concentration measured in ambient air. A description of the NAAQS and its
calculation can be found in the July 18,1997 Federal Register Notice.
A quality system for the PM2.5 program was developed in order to achieve the data quality objectives
(DQOs) that were developed for this program. In order to meet these DQOs, measurement quality
objectives were developed for the data quality indicators of precision, bias, accuracy and
completeness. The report identifies the data quality indicators and how the estimates of these indicators
were derived, evaluates the results, and provides conclusions and recommendations for future
improvements.
The data evaluated in this report are based upon a data extraction in AIRS on 7/11/01. This date was
chosen because it was after the July 1 certification date, and in the interest to report data quality results
to the States and EPA in a timely manner.
In general, the results show a marked increase in completeness for routine and QA data from CY99
with CYOO completeness values averaging between 50 to 75%. Precision, accuracy and bias estimates
at national levels of aggregation appear to be meeting the data quality objectives of the program.
111
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Contents
Section Page
Foreword ii
Abstract iii
Figures v
Tables vi
List of Abbreviations vii
Executive Summary viii
1. Introduction
Organization of QA Report 1
Program Overview 1
Data Quality Objectives 2
Quality System Implementation 4
Implementation of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A Requirements 5
Technical Systems Audits 5
Data Quality Indicators 7
2. Assessment of Data Quality Indicators
Data Completeness 9
Routine Data 9
Collocated Precision 13
Flow Rate Audits 14
Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data Bias Pairs 15
Precision - Collocated Sampling 17
Accuracy - Flow Rate Audits 19
Bias-Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data 20
3. Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions 22
Recommendations 26
Attachments
1 Manipulation of Data for Estimation of Precision, Bias or Accuracy
2 PM2.5 Routine Data Completeness
2-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
2-2 Data Completeness by State and Site ID
3 Summary of PM2.5 Data Flags
4 PM2.5 Precision
4-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
4-2 Collocated Precision Data Completeness
4-3 Collocated Precision Data Aggregated by Region/State/Reporting Organizations
5 PM2.5 Accuracy (Flow Rate)
5-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
5-2 Flow Rate Audit Data Completeness
5-3 Flow Rate Data Summaries
6 PM2.5 Bias (Performance Evaluation Program)
6-1 Bias Completeness Estimates
6-2 National Bias Estimates & Bias Estimates by State/Reporting Organization (99 and 00)
IV
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
Figure
1 1
1.2
2 1
2.2
2 3
24
2 5
2 6
2 7
2.8
2 9
2.10
2 11
2 12
2 13
2 14
2 15
2 16
2.17
2 18
3.1
F/gwres
TiY/e
Power curve based on 200 1 assumptions
Power curve changes due to changes in sampling frequency
Routine PM2 5 mass data completeness (all sites)
SLAMS PM2.5 mass data completeness
Routine data completeness as of 7/1 1/01
CY2000 Rutine data completeness for New England as of 0/1 1/01
Sites reporting routine data
Breakdown of flagged unflagged and null data codes in AIRS
Completeness of collocated precision data
Breakdown of precision completeness
Completeness of flow rate audit accuracy data
Breakdown of flow rate audit data
Completeness of PEP
CY99 and CYOO collocated precision estimates
Example of a reporting organization precision graph
CY99 and CYOO bias estimates
CY99 and CYOO Andersen and R&P sequential bias estimates
Example of bias graphs (CY99 and CYOO) by reporting organization
PM2.5 ConiDleteness statistics for CY99 and CYOO
Section
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
Page
3
4
9
9
10
11
12
12
13
14
14
15
16
17
18
18
19
20
21
21
23
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
Table
1-1
1-2
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
2-7
3-1
3-2
Tables
Title
DQO Assumptions
Technical System Audits conducted in CYOO
Routine Data Completeness Statistics
Yearly and Quarterly Precision Completeness Summary
Total and Percentages of Precision Sites Located at Sites Around the Annual
NAAQS
2000 PEP Site Completeness
CYOO Paired PEP/Routine Data
CYOO Flow Rate Summary (as of 7/1 1/01)
National Completeness Summary for CYOO (as of 7/11/01)
National Estimates of Primary Data Oualitv Indicators for CYOO (as of 7/11/01)
Section
1
.... 1
2
.... 1
2
2
.... 2
2
2
3
3
Page
3
6
12
13
14
15
16
17
20
22
22
VI
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
List of Abbreviations
AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CV coefficient of variation
DQA data quality assessment
DQOs data quality objectives
EDO environmental data operation
EMAD Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESAT Environmental Services Assistance Team
FEM Federal Equivalent Method
FRM Federal Reference Method
FS field scientist- Performance Evaluation Program
MQAG Monitoring and Quality Assurance Group
MQOs measurement quality objectives
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAMS national air monitoring stations
NERL National Exposure Research Laboratory
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
ORD Office of Research and Development
PE performance evaluation
PEP Performance Evaluation Program
PM25 particulate matter < 2.5 microns
PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
QA quality assurance
QAPP quality assurance project plan
QA/QC quality assurance/quality control
QMP quality management plan
R&P Rupprecht and Patashnick
SLAMS state and local monitoring stations
SOP standard operating procedure
TSA technical systems audit
vu
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Executive Summary
This report documents the quality assurance activities that were undertaken for EPA's PM2 5
environmental data operations for the calendar year January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 (CYOO),
which was the second year of implementation of the PM2 5 monitoring program.
In general, the measurement goal of the PM2 5 SLAMS Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program is to
estimate the concentration, in units of micrograms per cubic meter (|ig/m3), of particulate matter less than
or equal to [a nominal] 2.5 micrometers (fim) that have been collected on a 46.2mm
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter. For the State and Local Air Monitoring Network (SLAMS), the
primary goal is to compare the PM2 5 concentrations to the annual and 24-hour National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). The national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for PM2 5
are 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ( |ig/m3) annual arithmetic mean concentration and 65 |ig/m3 98th
percentile 24-hour average concentration measured in ambient air. A description of the NAAQS and its
calculation can be found in the July 18, 1997 Federal Register Notice.
A quality system for the PM2 5 program was developed in order to achieve the data quality objectives
(DQOs). The resulting quality assurance requirements are described in 40 CFR 58 App. A. This QA
Report evaluates the adherence to these requirements and evaluates the data quality indicators of
completeness, precision, accuracy, and bias.
Table 1 summarizes data completeness and Table 2 summarizes estimates of the primary data quality
indicators of precision, accuracy, and bias at a national level. Summary comments about these tables
follow. In addition Table 3, at the end of this executive summary, provides QA summary information at the
EPA Region, State and reporting organization level.
Table 1. National Completeness Summary for CYOO (as of 7/11/01)
Sites
Data Type (base # sites)
Routine Data (1054)*
Collocation Precision (227)
Flow Rate Accuracy (906)
Performance Evaluations
(227)
Performance Evaluation
Pairs (227)
Sites Meeting overall
completeness
requirements for all 4
quarters
%
60%
51%
57%
119%
107%
Number
631
116
519
269
243
% Sites meeting 75% Completeness
for Each Quarter
1
74%
78%
68%
>100%
92%
2
80%
76%
74%
>100%
>100%
3
85%
85%
76%
>100%
>100%
4
83%
79%
72%
>100%
>100%
% States
with ave.
completeness
>75%
72%
62%
62%
81%
* 1054 sites operated FRMs to monitor PM2 5 in CYOO. The remainder of the table is related specifically to SLAMS sites.
972 SLAMS sites operated FRMS to monitor PM2 5 in CYOO, of which 906 operated in all 4 quarters.
VUl
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Table 2. National Estimates of Primary Data Quality Indicators for CYOO (as of 7/11/01)
Data Type
Precision -Collocation
Accuracy-Flow Rate
Bias - Performance
Evaluations
Acceptance
Criteria
<10%CV
< + 4% Std.
< + 5% Design
<+10%
% of
RO1* Meeting
Criteria
80%
83%
85%2
National
Estimate
6.7%
-0.13%
-2.3
Quarterly Estimate
1
7.3%
-0.30%
0.3%
2
6.9%
0.0%
-1.2%
3
6.2%
0.02%
-4.9%
4
6.2%
-0.24%
-2.9%
1 RO = reporting organizations
- bias statistic estimated at the State level
Routine Data
Completeness - The completeness evaluation is based upon the strictest interpretation of the
completeness requirement in 40 CFR 50, App TV that a site must collect 75% valid data in every quarter in
order for comparison to the NAAQS. There are other techniques, such as data substitution, that can be
used to allow more information to be used for the NAAQS comparison that are not evaluated in this
report. Therefore, the 60% overall completeness estimate is the most conservative estimate of
completeness for CYOO. Since the requirement is based on 4 quarters, the overall completeness estimate
cannot be higher than the lowest quarterly completeness percentage. For comparison, the CY99
completeness estimate was 24% so there has been substantial progress made in CYOO.
Quality Control Data (Precision, Accuracy, Bias)
Due to low completeness values for the CY99 report, OAQPS instituted quarterly interim QA reports for
CYOO. Interim reports included tables on completeness as well as the achievement of the quality control
criteria for each quality control sample. Graphics of precision and bias are also presented at the reporting
organization level. Due to their large number, the graphics will be presented on the internet site and not in
this report, which summarize this data in table format in appendices.
Precision - Collocation
Completeness- The percentage of sites that have met the 75% completeness goal for all 4 quarters is
51%, a considerable improvement over the 10% reported in CY99. As with routine data, the overall
completeness value cannot be higher than the lowest quarterly value since the requirement is based on 4
quarters.
Precision Results - It must be emphasized that the precision data quality objective (DQO) is based on
three years of precision data (75% complete). Therefore, any one year or any quarter may exceed the
criteria and still meet the precision data quality objectives. An early analysis of precision suggests that the
DQO can be achieved at a national level and in most cases, at a reporting organization level.
IX
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
The national precision estimate is 6.7% CV and is based on 12,177 collocated paired values where both
values are > 6 jig/m3. Outliers (percent differences greater than 50% and not involving either paired value
< 6 |ig/m3 ), can be shown to have an effect on precision. In CYOO 74 extreme pairs (0.6 % of the total
collocated pairs) changed the national precision estimate from 6.7 % CV to 5.1% CV. A list of these
extreme values is included in each quarterly interim report. States are encouraged to review them for
validity due to their influence on the precision estimates, especially at the reporting organization level.
OAQPS investigated whether there was any significant difference in precision for the various method
designations. Although this did not appear to be the case in 1999, with more data available there may be
some statistically significant differences between the precision of Andersen instruments (method codes
119 and 120) and R&P instruments (method codes 117 and 118). Simple averaging of the quarterly
precision estimates of the Andersen single and sequential instruments yields a precision estimate of 7.8 %
CV while the aggregate estimate of the R&P yields a 6.1% CV. Removing outliers provides precision
values of 6.0 % CV and 4.7% CV for Andersen and R&P respectively. Since there are operational
differences between the instruments (e.g., how filter cassettes are loaded) as well as differences in the
number of paired values going into these averages, it is difficult to discern exactly what might be leading to
these different precision estimates.
Based upon a re-evaluation of the PM2.5 data quality objectives, which demonstrated that precision had
less effect on decision errors than originally estimated, OAQPS will suggest reducing the collocated
precision requirement from 25% of routine sites to 15%. OAQPS feels that if completeness can be
maintained at this lower level of data collection it can still make precision estimates at the reporting
organization with an appropriate level of confidence.
Accuracy -Flow Rate
Completeness- Flow rate accuracy overall completeness was 57% in CYOO compared to 18% in
CY99. A positive or negative bias in flow rate can alter the cut point of the particulate matter collected on
the filter and also affects the 24 hour air volume estimate that is used to derive the PM2 5 concentration.
OAQPS will continue to make attempts to improve the capture rate of this data for future calendar years.
Accuracy Results - For the information available, the results of the accuracy audits are very good. The
national average accuracy estimate is -0.13% which is well within the acceptance criteria of ±4% of the
standard and ±5% of the design value (see Table 2). The percentage of audits meeting the criterion (all
method designations) of ±4% of the standard was 96% and the percentage meeting the criterion of + 5%
of the 16.67 L/min design flow rate was 97%. There was some difference between the audit failure rates of
the two major method designations. The Andersen sequential sampler (719 flow audits) failed the 4%
criteria 9.7 % of the time and the 5% design standard 6.5% of the time; whereas the R&P sequential
(2700 flow audits) failed the 4% standard 3% of the time and the 5% design standard 1.4% of the time.
Additionally, it appears that the rates at which the Andersen sequential sampler fails the two criteria are
increasing.
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
Bias - Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data
Completeness - Completeness of the performance evaluation data involves two data points that are
collected by different organizations. The bias estimate must rely on Performance Evaluation Program
(PEP) data collected by the EPA Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT) contract. The routine
PM2 5 data is collected by the State, local and Tribal Nations. The PEP achieved its completeness
requirement by collecting complete valid data at 269 sites, which was over the anticipated 227 sites (25%
of the 906 SLAMS sites operating in all 4 quarters). However, when the data for these 269 sites were
matched with their respective routine data in AIRS, 243 sites produced valid site/pairs that met the
completeness requirement. If one looks at actual valid samples that were taken, of the 1089 valid PEP
values, 941 have a routine sample match in AIRS, meaning that 148 valid PEP values (14% of PEP data)
are not matched with a routine sample. In 1999 there were 287 values without a match so there has been a
marked improvement in pairing PEP data with routine data.
Bias results
The bias data quality objective is based on three years of bias data (75% complete). At a national level,
the average bias is estimated at -2.2% and it appears that the bias data quality objective is being met. The
2000 national bias estimate is more than 3 percentage points lower than the 1999 bias estimate of 1.7%.
OAQPS will continue to watch for this over CY01.
Since the data sets for the bias estimates for any quarter and in some cases annual averages for some
method designations are fairly small, outliers can have an effect. An outlier for this report was defined as
any paired values that had a percent difference of > + 50% where both values were >6 |ig/m3. For the
Andersen sequential method designation, the removal of 4 outliers from the annual estimate (217 pairs to
213) changed the bias estimate from 2.17% to 0.65%. Removing 5 outliers (506 pairs to 501) from the
R&P sequential pairs changed the annual bias estimate from -4.1% to -4.73%.
As illustrated above there was some difference in the annual bias estimates for the Andersen sequential
(2.17%) and R & P sequential (-4.1%) yet both are well within the ±10% DQO. On a quarterly basis,
Andersen sequential bias estimates appear more variable than the R&P sequential bias estimates.
Data Summary
In general, improvements still need to be made in achieving data completeness for routine data and
precision and accuracy information. The percentage of States with average completeness of routine
precision, bias, and accuracy exceeding 75% are 72%, 62%, 81% and 66% respectively (see Table 1).
Incomplete data will affect the confidence one has in annual and other higher level aggregate concentration
estimates.
Precision, accuracy and bias quality control requirements are being met at a national level which is a
positive sign. However, uncertainty estimates at the reporting organization may require some attention.
There appears to be more uncertainty associated with the Andersen method designations than the R & P
method designation. The uncertainty may not be directly attributable with the instrument but might include
the sampling and analytical processes as well. In addition, due to smaller sample size, Andersen data may
be more affected by bias outliers. As more data become available the significance of these differences can
be determined. Currently, the percentage of reporting organizations with average precision < 10% is 80%,
and with average flow rate < 4% is 83%. States with average bias < 10% is 85%.
XI
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
Summary Table
Table 3 provides a summary of completeness, precision, bias and accuracy. This table is separated by
EPA Region, State and reporting organization. Details of how the estimates were generated are explained
in Attachment 1. Table 3 is based on the strictest interpretation of the CFR requirements. As an example,
the "average percent completeness" column (2nd column) for routine SLAMS data was developed around
the CFR criteria that requires 75% complete data for each quarter (for 3 years) for comparison to the
NAAQS. For this column, the average completeness for each full quarter that a SLAMS site operated
was tallied into a yearly average and this yearly average was tallied for all SLAMS sites in a State. Figure
1 provides an example of a state comprised of 11 SLAMS sites, 10 of which had their first data point
reported to AIRS prior to the start of CYOO. The site that had its 1st data point reported on 9/10/00 did
not have the 3rd quarter data used in its average for the year, nor the 1st or 2nd quarter. Therefore, the
average completeness for this example state is 81%. Since CFR requires that a site must be at least 75%
complete in all quarters in order to be able make an attainment decision, the information that would be
placed in the third column of Table 3 would be "2/11" meaning that out of the 11 sites that operated in
CYOO, 2 sites were at least 75% complete in all 4 quarters.
Site#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1st Data Point
01/01/99
09/10/00
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
07/02/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
(
Q1
52%
79%
59%
55%
38%
52%
52%
60%
45%
80%
auarterly Completeness for CY
Q2 Q3
87% 94%
93%
81%
80%
1 00%
93%
93%
80%
80%
80%
(13%)
97%
90%
94%
88%
97%
97%
1 00%
94%
94%
Statewide Ave CYOO
nn
Q4
90%
77%
80%
90%
83%
87%
87%
87%
87%
83%
83%
Completeness
Annual
Average
81%
77%
87%
80%
78%
78%
82%
82%
82%
76%
84%
81%
Figure 1 Example of routine data completeness information for a State (real information in Attachment 2-2)
As mentioned the 75% completeness criteria used is the "strictest" within CFR. Another requirement
includes having a minimum of 11 values in order to determine non-attainment, and there are other data
substitution methods.
The estimates for the other columns in Table 3 were developed in similar fashion and are explained in
Attachment 1.
The development of this table is to help focus on where improvements to the quality system can be made.
Lack of data or exceeding the acceptance criteria for a data quality indicator tend to decrease the certainty
one has in a mass estimate. One must also remember that the data quality indicator acceptance criteria are
based on 3 years of data so estimates for any one year can be improved. One should not construe
highlighted cells in Table 3 as implying that the data are invalid.. The acceptance criteria are simply goals
and are not limits by which one would consider the data unusable.
xii
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by State/Reporting Organizations - Region 1
State
CT
MA
ME
NH
RI
VT
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
80%
75%
92%
63%
91%
93%
1/10
4/21
5/5
0/9
6/6
3/3
Precision
88%
76%
77%
33%
77%
0%
3/2
2/5
1/1
0/2
0/2
0/1
Bias
69%
95%
92%
67%
88%
100%
3/2
5/5
3/1
2/2
2/2
2/1
Flow Rate
100%
82%
55%
0%
92%
100%
10/10
18/21
3/5
0/9
6/6
3/3
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
Free.
(%CV)
9.8
7.2
5.0
10.0
5.5
3.6
Bias
(%)
-12.0
11.1
1.5
-4.2
0.2
-3.2
Accuracy (Plow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
0.7
-0.1
-0.6
ND
0.1
0.9
%>
4%
2
2
7
ND
3
4
% > 5% of
Design Flow
2
1
4
ND
3
4
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 2
State
NJ
NY
PR
VI
Average % Completeness | Num compete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
83%
86%
79%
56%
7/19
20/50
1/10
0/3
Precision
78%
99%
52%
0%
0/5
8/11
0/3
0/1
Bias
100%
94%
75%
0%
5/5
9/11
2/3
0/1
Flow Rate
89%
77%
0%
0%
17/19
38/50
0/10
0/3
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
Prec.
(% CV)
6.7
6.5
4.9
ND
Bias
(%)
3.0
2.7
-15.4
ND
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
-0.2
0.8
ND
ND
%>
4%
4
5
ND
ND
% > 5% of
Design Flow
2
3
ND
ND
Xlll
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 3
State
DC
DE
MD
PA
VA
WV
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
78%
95%
73%
82%
88%
94%
1/3
111
3/18
12/37
12/20
10/12
Precision
49%
98%
78%
59%
100%
100%
0/1
2/2
0/5
2/9
3/5
2/3
Bias
88%
100%
75%
86%
85%
85%
2/1
2/2
4/5
9/9
4/5
5/3
Flow Rate
0%
100%
0%
77%
99%
51%
0/3
111
0/18
28/37
20/20
5/12
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
001
002
003
ALL
ALL
001
002
Prec.
(% CV)
10.2
7.2
3.6
5.6
6.1
3.0
3.8
4.3
4.0
3.8
4.2
Bias
(%)
-1.6
1.4
-4.2
-3.3
-4.2
-4.9
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
ND
0.8
ND
-1.0
-1.2
ND
-0.3
0.8
0.4
0.4
ND
%>
4%
ND
5
ND
1
0
ND
4
0
7
7
ND
%>5%of
Design Flow
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
XIV
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 4
State
AL
FL
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
65%
92%
4/16
23/29
Precision
67%
75%
1/4
6/7
Bias
71%
94%
3/4
8/7
Flow Rate
6%
91%
1/16
27/29
Rep
Org
ALL
Oil
012
014
ALL
001
002
003
004
005
006
Oil
012
013
014
015
016
017
018
020
039
062
Free.
(%CV)
7.6
9.1
8.2
1.7
7.6
9.3
14.0
7.6
3.1
3.3
3.9
3.7
9.9
6.5
ND
3.1
3.9
15.4
ND
3.6
3.1
ND
Bias
(%)
1.9
-5.3
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
0.6
ND
ND
0.6
0.5
1
1.1
0.4
0.4
2.3
-0.3
0.6
-0.1
1.0
0.8
1.0
-3.5
2.1
0.8
1.0
-3.4
-3.5
%>
4%
0
ND
ND
0
6
14
0
0
0
20
0
13
13
0
0
0
38
0
0
0
0
0
%>5%of
Design Flow
0
ND
ND
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
XV
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 4
State
GA
KY
MS
NC
sc
TN
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
85%
88%
95%
88%
93%
85%
14/23
12/19
14/16
23/31
11/14
12/21
Precision
62%
80%
63%
80%
91%
93%
0/6
3/5
0/4
6/7
2/3
5/5
Bias
95%
80%
94%
100%
100%
100%
5/6
4/5
4/4
9/7
4/3
4/5
Flow Rate
100%
80%
95%
86%
100%
66%
23/23
17/19
16/16
27/31
14/14
12/21
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
001
002
ALL
ALL
001
002
003
004
ALL
ALL
001
002
003
004
005
Free.
(%CV)
5.7
5.5
5.4
6.3
4.7
5.3
5.3
2.2
1.8
10.1
3.8
7.0
8.5
2.7
9.5
2.6
2.7
Bias
(%)
8.5
-0.9
-7.2
-0.5
-4.6
0.9
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
-0.3
-0.5
-0.7
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.5
-0.1
-0.5
-1.1
0.3
-0.1
0.4
1.8
%>
4%
7
16
21
0
2
5
7
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
7
0
0
%>5%of
Design Flow
4
12
16
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
7
0
0
XVI
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 5
State
IL
IN
MI
MN
OH
WI
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
91%
87%
88%
69%
83%
94%
30/35
24/40
15/24
0/16
19/45
21/21
Precision
72%
85%
91%
50%
63%
92%
1/9
6/10
5/6
0/4
5/9
3/5
Bias
84%
92%
88%
71%
80%
94%
8/9
9/10
6/6
4/4
11/9
8/5
Flow Rate
94%
96%
77%
42%
58%
98%
35/35
39/40
18/24
3/16
21/45
21/21
Rep
Org
ALL
001
003
ALL
001
008
ALL
ALL
ALL
001
002
004
006
007
008
009
010
012
013
015
016
ALL
Prec.
(%CV)
7.2
6.7
7.9
9.4
9.8
8.1
3.7
16.9
9.1
5.6
0.6
4.7
15.3
13.0
4.0
9.5
9.1
7.1
17.9
16.0
3.2
8.4
Bias
(%)
7.1
-1.1
-1.9
15.0
0.0
1.5
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
0.1
0.4
-0.5
-0.2
-0.2
-0.6
0.1
-0.8
0.2
1.3
1.8
ND
1.1
0.4
1.3
-0.3
-0.3
0.8
3.1
-4.6
-0.4
0.2
%>
4%
18
14
25
0
0
0
3
0
9
0
0
ND
13
0
4
7
9
0
25
67
0
2
%>5%of
Design Flow
11
9
15
0
0
0
2
0
7
0
0
ND
13
0
0
3
9
0
25
67
0
1
xvu
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 6
State
AR
IA
NM
OK
TX
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
86%
95%
90%
85%
75%
7/24
20/21
2/3
1/4
17/57
Precision
76%
93%
53%
82%
59%
1/4
4/5
1/1
0/1
3/13
Bias
85%
100%
90%
79%
68%
5/4
5/5
5/1
6/1
8/13
Flow Rate
70%
100%
33%
100%
0%
14/24
21/21
0/3
4/4
0/57
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
ALL
001
002
006
007
ALL
101
106
ALL
001
822
Prec.
(%CV)
5.9
8.0
4.2
3.5
4.1
3.5
5.6
6.5
4.3
9.9
6.5
6.5
ND
Bias
(%)
-10.9
-8.6
-7.0
-9.7
-12.2
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
-0.1
0.0
-0.4
0.1
-0.5
ND
ND
-0.2
-0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
%>
4%
1
1
0
0
0
ND
ND
1
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
%>5%of
Design Flow
0
0
0
0
0
ND
ND
0
0
ND
ND
ND
ND
XVU1
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 7
State
IA
KS
MO
NE
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
95%
96%
97%
79%
16/18
12/12
16/19
2/13
Precision
100%
93%
98%
60%
5/4
3/3
7/4
0/3
Bias
67%
92%
100%
100%
2/4
3/3
6/4
2/3
Flow Rate
96%
100%
92%
56%
17/18
12/12
18/19
8/13
Rep
Org
ALL
001
002
003
ALL
ALL
001
002
003
004
005
ALL
001
003
Prec.
(%CV)
3.5
4.4
4.0
3.1
4.8
4.7
3.0
6.0
6.0
2.1
4.1
11.3
5.9
15.1
Bias
(%)
-12.7
-6.5
-6.0
-14.3
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
0.4
0.1
0.7
0.4
-2.0
-0.0
-0.1
-0.2
1.0
-0.3
-0.6
-0.3
-0.2
-0.4
%>
4%
1
0
0
3
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
%>5%of
Design Flow
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
XIX
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3. Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 8
State
CO
MT
ND
SD
UT
WY
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
94%
89%
97%
77%
92%
97%
12/13
3/7
6/7
0/11
10/16
4/4
Precision
94%
48%
98%
71%
72%
100%
3/3
0/2
2/2
0/3
1/3
1/1
Bias
100%
83%
100%
58%
100%
50%
5/3
3/2
2/2
1/3
4/3
0/1
Flow Rate
98%
93%
100%
98%
78%
^
13/13
111
111
11/11
12/16
2/4
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
001
033
037
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
Prec.
(%CV)
7.2
10.0
2.8
12.4
13.0
4.3
12.1
8.5
5.2
Bias
(%)
-0.6
2.1
-6.9
0.7
-0.3
6.3
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
-0.6
-1.8
-1.5
-0.6
-6.9
-0.3
-0.2
-1.1
-0.8
%>
4%
0
10
9
0
50
4
0
4
7
%>5%of
Design Flow
1
8
6
0
50
0
0
1
3
XX
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3 Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 9
State
AZ
CA
ffl
NV
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
25%
83%
84%
97%
0/5
49/83
4/5
7/8
Precision
38%
71%
82%
100%
0/1
7/20
0/1
2/2
Bias
75%
83%
100%
75%
1/1
16/20
2/1
2/2
Flow Rate
10%
66%
85%
3%
0/5
52/83
5/5
0/8
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
001
004
014
019
036
061
ALL
ALL
200
300
310
Prec.
(%CV)
5.0
6.1
7.2
ND
ND
5.0
7.7
4.6
6.3
5.3
1.7
7.3
5.3
Bias
(%)
-8.8
-0.8
ND
-6.1
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
-0.3
-0.9
-1.4
-2.3
-0.6
-0.4
0.2
-0.4
-0.0
-7.0
ND
ND
-7.0
%>
4%
0
10
11
22
0
2
23
5
5
100
ND
ND
100
%>5%of
Design Flow
0
8
10
16
0
2
12
5
0
100
ND
ND
100
XXI
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 3 Summary of 2000 QC Results by Reporting Organizations - Region 10
State
AK
ID
OR
WA
Average % Completeness | Num complete sites/Num required sites
Routine
(SLAMS)
92%
97%
81%
90%
4/7
6/7
16/25
16/20
Precision
94%
96%
77%
92%
3/2
1/2
3/6
3/5
Bias
75%
100%
79%
95%
4/2
3/2
5/6
5/5
Flow Rate
85%
71%
95%
90%
6/7
5/7
23/25
19/20
Rep
Org
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
001
012
Prec.
(%CV)
7.2
3.1
4.7
3.6
3.6
ND
Bias
(%)
-8.1
-4.7
-10.3
-3.0
Accuracy (Flow Rate)
Avg %
Diff
1.6
1.5
-1.0
-0.2
-0.3
0.6
%>
4%
0
0
0
1
1
0
%>5%of
Design Flow
0
0
1
1
1
0
xxu
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
1. Introduction
This report documents the quality assurance activities that were undertaken for the SLAMS PM2 5
environmental data operations for the calendar year January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 (CYOO).
Data used in this report was extracted from AIRS on 7/11/01.
The QA Report evaluates the adherence to the quality assurance requirements described in 40 CFR 58
Appendix A and evaluates the data quality indicators of completeness, precision, accuracy, and bias.
The QA Report should be viewed as an annual snapshot to determine whether or not the quality system,
in general, is providing data of acceptable quality for its primary use. It follows a similar format to the
CY99 QA Report, with additions or modifications based on comments to the CY99 Report. The report
will provide evaluations at a national level, the reporting organization level and in some cases by sampler
method designation and the site. However, most discussions will be at the national level of aggregation.
In addition, some of the graphical representations of the data will be too large to include in the document
and will be displayed at the AMTIC Web Site (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmqa.html). Examples of
these graphics and the web site location will be included in appendices in this report.
Organization of QA Report
The report has been organized into 3 main sections:
»• Section 1: overview of the PM2 5 monitoring program, the CYOO implementation aspects of the
quality system in relation to the quality assurance requirements described in 40 CFR 58 App A.
»• Section 2: results of the data quality assessment.
*• Section 3: summary and conclusions of the data quality assessment results and recommendations
based upon experiences of CYOO implementation.
Program Overview
The criteria pollutant defined as "particulate matter" is a general term used to describe a broad class of
substances that exist as liquid or solid particles over a wide range of sizes. As part of the Ambient Air
Quality Monitoring Program, two particle size fractions are measured; those less than or equal to [a
nominal] 10 micrometers, and those less than or equal to [a nominal] 2.5 micrometers, hereafter referred
to as PM10 or PM2 5 respectively.
The background and rationale for the implementation of the PM2 5 ambient air monitoring network can be
found in the Federal Register 40 CFR 50 July 18, 1997 . In general, the measurement goal of the
PM2 5 network is to estimate the concentration, in units of micrograms per cubic meter (|ig/m3), of
particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers (fim) aerodynamic diameter collected over a 24
hour period.
A major objective for the collection of the data is to compare daily PM2 5 concentrations to the annual
(15.0 |ig/m3 annual arithmetic mean concentration) and 24-hour (65 |ig/m3 24-hour average
Page -1-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
concentration) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). A description of the NAAQS and its
calculation can be found in the July 18, 1997 Federal Register notice.
As described in the following section (DQOs), OAQPS designed a quality system based upon the
primary objective of the network, which was the comparison of data to the NAAQS. For this
comparison, State, local, and Tribal monitoring organizations are required to sample using a Federal
Reference Method (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Method (FEM). The description of the PM2 5 FRM
is included in 40 CFR 50, App. L, published as a final rule in the Federal Register on July 18, 1997.
There are a number of designated federal reference method samplers at this time whose descriptions
can be found on the AMTIC Website in (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmfrm.html )
The PM2 5 federal equivalent methods (FEM) vary from this basic FRM definition and are divided into
three categories, Class I, JJ, and IJJ. Definitions for each of these are provided in 40 CFR 53.1,
published as a final rule in foe. Federal Register on July 18, 1997. There are no designated equivalent
PM2 5 methods at this time, nor have any manufacturers formally pursued this type of designation.
It is important to emphasize that all PM2 5 sampling sites that provide data for comparison to either the
24-hour or the annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the purposes of addressing attainment and nonattainment
decisions must employ designated FRM/FEM sampling techniques.
Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)
DQOs are qualitative and quantitative statements derived from the DQO Process that clarify the
monitoring objectives, define the appropriate type of data, and specify the tolerable levels of potential
decision errors that will be used as the basis for establishing the quality and quantity of data needed to
support decisions. By applying the DQO Process to the development of a quality system for PM2 5
network, the EPA guards against committing resources to data collection efforts that do not support a
defensible decision. During the months from April to July of 1997, the DQO Process was implemented
for the PM2 5 program. The DQOs were based on the desire of the decision maker(s) to estimate the
annual concentration at a site within acceptable levels of error, especially when the annual concentration
is near 15.0 ug/m3. Based upon the acceptable decision error of 5%, the DQO for acceptable
precision (10% CV) and bias (+ 10%) were identified. See the CY99 QA Report for additional
information on the assumptions affecting the DQO.
In 2001, the PM2 5 DQOs were evaluated to ensure that the assumptions made in 1997 continue to be
appropriate. Table 1-1 provides a listing of these assumptions. As is indicated, most of the 1997
assumptions are still appropriate in 2001. An important fact is that the DQOs are generated using
conservative but realistic assumptions. For example, the DQO was generated on the 1 in 6 day
sampling frequency at 75% completeness since it is allowed in the Code of Federal Regulation. A 95%
confidence limit around the mean at this sampling frequency would be "wider" than the 95% confidence
limit for an every day sampling frequency at 90% completeness. That is, the assumptions are close to
the extremes of the realistic data. A draft report on the 1997 development and 2001 evaluation of the
PM2.5 DQO has been completed and will be available on the PM2.5 AMTIC Website [ WEB
ADDRESS] in October 2001.
Page -2-
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 1-1 DQO Assumptions
1997 Assumptions
Bias = ±10%
Precision = 10%
Annual NAAQS is controlling standard
No spatial uncertainty and each monitor stands on
its own (no spatial averaging)
1 in 6 sampling with 75% completeness (137 days)
3-year annual average is truth, (every day
sampling and 100% comp.) up to bias and
measurement variability
Normal distribution for population variability,
50% CV
Normal distribution for measurement uncertainty
Season ratio = 5.63
No auto correlation
Bias/meas. variability applies to entire 3 years
Decision errors 5%
2001 Assumptions
Bias =±10%
Precision = 10%
Annual NAAQS is controlling standard
No spatial uncertainty and each monitor stands on
its own (no spatial averaging)
1 in 6 sampling with 75% completeness (144 days)
3-year annual average is truth, (every day
sampling and 100% comp.) up to bias and
measu rement variability
Lognormal distribution for population variability,
80% CV
Normal distribution for measurement uncertainty
Season ratio = 5.3
No auto correlation
Bias/meas. variability applies to entire 3 years
Decision errors 5%
Using the 2001 assumptions, a power curve was generated. A power curve is used to display the
potential of decision errors based upon the choice of various assumptions that affect data uncertainty.
Figure 1.1 provides the
power curve based on
the 2001 assumptions.
The gray zone is the
range of concentrations
for which the decision
errors are larger than
the desired rate of 5%.
Power Curves and Gray Zone
Probability
that measured
3-year mean
cone. > 15
ug/m3 given a
positive 10%
-bias
Probability that
3-year mean
cone. > 15 ug/m3
given a negative
10% bias
30 -
20
10 -
True Three-Year Annual Mean
Based on the 2001
assumptions, the gray
zone is 12.2 to 18.8
ug/m3 assuming bias is
10% and measurement
imprecision is 10%.
This means that if all the
2001 assumptions hold
for a particular site, the
decision maker would
have a 5% chance of
Figure 1.1 Power curve based on 2001 assumptions
Page -3-
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
observing a 3-year mean concentration that is greater than 15 ug/m3 even though the true mean
concentration is 12.2 ug/m3. As has been mentioned, the 2001 assumptions are realistic but
conservative. Any particular site will not meet all these assumptions at these extreme levels and it will
be demonstrated later in this report that the precision and bias estimates at a national level are well
within the DQOs. Assumptions that are "better" than those listed in Table 1-1 will tend to decrease the
width of the gray zone. Figure 1.2 provides an example of the power curve/gray zone changes for a
simple change in sampling frequency from 1 in 6 day (green/solid) to 1 in 3 day (blue/dots) to every day
(red/dashed); all the other 2001 assumptions remain the same.
PM2.5 Mass Data Quality Objectives
Power Curves
1 in 6 day
1 in 3 day
every day
Because there is potential for the
assumptions to change on a site by
site basis, OAQPS commissioned
the development of a software tool
to help Headquarters and State,
local and Tribal organizations
determine their potential for
decision errors based on their
particular assumptions. Figure 1.2
is generated using this tool and
allows for multiple scenarios
(power curves) to be reviewed on
one table. This tool is being
finalized and should be available by
December, 2001
The DQO evaluation showed that
population uncertainty (sampling
frequency, distribution of
population variability), and
measurement bias play a significant
role in the width of the gray zone. Measurement precision did not have a significant effect on the gray
zone which suggests more imprecision could be tolerated with little effect on decision errors. Based on
this finding, OAQPS will suggest reducing the collocated sampling requirement from 25% to 15% as a
direct final rule.
12
13 14 15 16 17
True PM2.5 Mass Concentration
18
19
20
Figure 1.2. Power curve changes due to changes in sampling frequency
Quality System Implementation
CYOO represents the second full year of implementation of PM2.5 ambient air monitoring. The CY99
QA Report discussed issues related to the development and approval of QA project plans and
additional guidance that helped explain the requirements or provided additional information. In CYOO
there was not much additional guidance provided or needed for the PM2.5 ambient air monitoring
program. However, the following guidance was developed:
Page -4-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
DOW-704 WINS impactor Oil - A number of monitoring organizations reported a gelling or
crystallization of the DOW-705 WINS impactor oil, usually during cold sampling events. A joint
study was conducted by the EPA National Environmental Research Laboratory (NERL) and the
State of Connecticut to determine the effect of this crystallization. Although the crystallization did not
appear to have an effect on the "cut point" or concentrations, NERL did provide information on the
use of an oil substitute, dioctyl sebacate (DOS), that can be used in place of the DOW-704 oil.
Filter extension study - A number of State monitoring organizations volunteered to participate in a
study to determine if the filter cassette retrieval time could be extended from 4 days (96 hours) to 7
days (177 hours). Sampling is planned through fall 2001 and the results from the study are expected
in the December 2001 time frame.
Flagging - A memo, distributed 3/27/00 from OAQPS to the Regions, provided for the use of 6
data qualifiers for data submitted to AIRS. OAQPS is evaluating the use of flagged data to determine
if the flagged data have a significant effect on annual average concentrations.
Implementation of 40 CFR 58 Appendix A Requirements.
40 CFR 58 App. A provides the quality assurance requirements for the State and local air monitoring
station (SLAMS) network. The requirements for PM2 5 include:
•> Development, submission, approval and implementation of QA project plans For the PM2 5
Mass network, all State and local QAPPs have been reviewed and approved. This process is
somewhat dynamic since various Tribes are also participating in PM2 5 monitoring. Discussions
with the regions show that Tribal QAPPs are also being reviewed and approved in the appropriate
time frames.
> Implementation of technical systems audits - Technical systems audits (TSAs) are a thorough,
systematic, on-site, qualitative audit of facilities, equipment, personnel, training, procedures, record
keeping, data validation, data management, and reporting aspects of a system. Regions are to
perform TSAs on one third of their reporting organizations each year. Table 1-2 provides a
summary of the TSAs conducted during CYOO.
»• Implementation of quarterly flow rate audits- See Section 2
•> Implementation of collocated sampling- See Section 2
»• Implementation of a Performance Evaluation Program- See Section 2
Page -5-
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Table 1-2. Technical System Audits Conducted in CYOO
Reg.
1
2
3
4
5
6
State
CT
MA
ME
NH
RI
VT
NJ
NY
PR
VI
DE
DC
MD
PA - Philadelphia County
PA -Allegheny County
PA
VA
WV
ALDEM
FLDEP
GA
KYDEP
MSDEQ
NCDEM
SC DHEC
TN DAPC
AL -Birmingham- Jefferson County
AL- Huntsville
KY- Louisville- Jefferson County
TN- Nashville-Davidson County
TN- Chattanooga-Hamilton County
TN- Knoxville-Knox County
TN- Memphis-Shelby County
MN
WI
MI-MDEQ
OH - Toledo Agency
IL
IN
AR
LA
OK
NM
NM -Albuquerque
Texas
ITEC (Tribal)
AIPC (Tribal)
ISA
None in CYOO
None in CYOO
ISA
Date
9/28/00
6/00
6/00
7/00
5/00
9/00
2/00
4/00
8/00
3/22/00
5/14/00
12/7/00
2/11/00
8/14/00
10/27/00
10/26/00
5/5/00
9/20/00
Page-6-
-------
PM2.5CYOOQA Report
November 2001
Reg.
7
8
9
10
State
MO
KS
IA -Linn County
IA- Polk County
NE-
U of Iowa
CO
MT
ND
SD
UT
WY
AZ
CA -ARE
CA - Bay Area AQMD
CA - South Coast AQMD
San Diego APCD
HI
NV- Pima County
NV- Washoe County
NV- Clark County
AK
ID
OR
WA
ISA
ISA
Date
3/00
12/20/00
10/11/00
9/28/00
Data Quality Indicators
Once a DQO is established, the quality of the data must be measured and evaluated to ensure that it is
maintained within the established acceptance criteria. Measurement quality objectives are designed to
evaluate and control various phases (sampling, preparation, analysis) of the measurement process to
ensure that total measurement uncertainty is within the range prescribed by the DQOs. The quality of
data in a database can be summarized in terms of the following data quality indicators:
Completeness - a measure of the amount of valid data obtained from a measurement system
compared to the amount that was expected to be obtained under correct, normal conditions. Data
completeness requirements are included in the reference methods (40 CFR 50).
Precision - a measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same
property usually under prescribed similar conditions. This is the random component of error.
Bias - the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process which causes error in
one direction. Bias will be determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation from the
true value as a percentage of the true value.
Detectabilitv- The determination of the low range critical value of a characteristic that a method
specific procedure can reliably discern.
Comparability - a measure of confidence with which one data set can be compared to another.
Page-7-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report November 2001
Representativeness - a measure of the degree which data accurately and precisely represent a
characteristic of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, a process condition, or an
environmental condition. Representativeness, which deals mainly the population variability
indicators (spatial and temporal variability) will not be addressed in this document.
Accuracy has been a term frequently used to represent closeness to "truth" and includes a combination
of precision and bias error components. This term has been used throughout the CFR. In this report,
accuracy refers to errors in flow rate only.
Acceptance criteria have been developed for four of these data quality indicators: completeness,
precision, accuracy(flow rate) and bias. The results of the assessments of these data quality indicators
will be discussed in Section 2.
Page-8-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
1200
1000
Completeness - Routine FRM
y.S. Data Capture by Quarter, 2000
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
| B Operating D With DataD 75% Complete]
Section 2 Assessment of Data Quality Indicators
This section will provide an assessment of the data quality indicators of completeness, precision,
accuracy and bias. It must be noted that all assessments were implemented on data present in
AIRS on 7/11/01.
Data Completeness
This section will evaluate the completeness statistics for routine PM2.5 concentration data and the quality
assurance data for the collocated precision, the quarterly flow rate audits, and the Performance
Evaluation Program.
Completeness - Routine Data
Figure 2.1 represents CYOO routine data
completeness as of 7/11/01 based on all
sites; Figure 2.2 represents the routine
data completeness for the SLAMS Sites.
Figures 2.3 and 2.4 show a geographic
illustration of this information provided in
Figure 2.1. Attachment 1 provides an
explanation of the process to generate this
information which is based upon the
completeness requirements for
comparison to the NAAQS (40 CFR 50
App N, Sect 2). Attachment 2-2
provides a listing of completeness at the
EPA Regional level as well as for each
site in 2000. For calendar year 2000,
the AIRS data base identified 1143
PM2 5 sites in AIRS as active, with 1103
reporting concentration data to AIRS as
of 7/11/01. Of these sites, 1054
monitoring sites reported data in all 4
quarters and 631 sites (60%) reported 4
complete quarters of data, meaning they
had greater than or equal to 75% of the
anticipated data reported for each
quarter. This is a marked improvement
over the 26% of the sites that achieved
this completeness requirement in CY99.
Q1 '00 Q2 '00 Q3 '00
[1054 sites operated in all 4 quarters]
Q4'00
1631 sites (60% of 1054) have 4 complete quarters (>.75%).
Figure 2.1 Routine PM25mass data completeness (all sites)
SLAMS Completeness - Routine FRM
U.S. Data Capture by Quarter, 2000
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
Operating Dwith DataD 75% Complete|
Q1 '00 Q2 '00 Q3 '00 Q4 '00
[906 sites operated in all 4 quarters]
'544 sites (60% of 906) have 4 complete quarters £ 75%).
Figure 2.2 SLAMS PM25mass data completeness
Page-9-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Figure 2.3 Routine data completeness as of 7/11/01
Page -10-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
2000 PM2.5FRM Data Completeness - Region 1
Notes
•As of AIRS, 7/11/01
• Site basis; only primary monitors included
• Only sites that operated in 2000 included
• 79 Tr.tal .Qitoc
Map Legend
• 75% complete in all 4 quarters [30]
o Other sites with data [40]
* Sites with no 2000 data in AIRS [2]
Figure 2.4 CY 2000 Routine data completeness for New England as of 07/11/01
Figure 2.1 also indicates the number of sites reporting > 75% of the expected data for each quarter
(792, 874, 939 and 934 respectively). Using these values, one can compare how many sites met the
completeness criteria for any quarter using the sites operating in that quarter. Table 2-1 provides this
information. In addition, since all the statistics related to precision, accuracy and bias are related to
SLAMS sites only, Table 2-1 also presents the completeness statistics for the SLAMS sites illustrated
in Figure 2.2. As can be seen, the completeness statistics are almost identical.
Page-11-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Table 2-1 Routine Data Completeness Statistics
Sites
Data Type (base #
sites)
All Routine Sites
(1054)
SLAMS Sites (906)
Sites Meeting overall
completeness requirements for
all 4 quarters
%
60%
60%
Number
631
544
% Sites meeting 75% Completeness
for Each Quarter
1
74%
74%
2
80%
80%
3
85%
85%
4
83%
84%
Number of sites reporting routine data in...
281
29
I—I Zero quarters
D Only 1 quarter
D Any 2 quarters
I—I Any 3 quarters
D All 4 quarters
It must be mentioned that non attainment
decisions can be made with less information than
the 75% completeness requirement based on the
average concentration in the quarter, acceptable
data substitution for the missing data, and
Regional Administrator approval. In addition, for
non-attainment purposes, the Regional
Administrator may use sites that have as few as
11 values per quarter if the average quarterly
concentration is above the NAAQS (40 CFR 50
App N, Sect 2) and less under unusual
conditions. Information on completeness using
these exceptions are not generated for this
report. The pie chart, illustrated in Figure 2.5
indicates how many sites reported any concentration data (not necessarily meeting the completeness
statistic) in any combination of quarters.
Flagged data were included in the completeness count; null value data were not. Flagged data values
can be data qualifiers (provided in a March 27, 2000 OAQPS guidance memorandum), sampler
generated flags, or exceptional events. Figure 2.6 provides a breakdown of the routine concentration
data in AIRS relative to flagged, unflagged, and null value code data. Attachment 3 provides a listing of
flag use and flag type by State. OAQPS and the States will be determining the quality of the flagged
information over the next year.
;1143 sites operated in 2000; 1103 sites reported data]
Figure 2.5 Sites reporting routine data.
....... _ _ .
8 0% 7 _ Values w/ Flags
/"""^ I /^^. 7.0%
\ U-^^i
VX. -XV
^^•"•y -"^^
^•nC.^ _^f^f'r
\/alues w/out flags _/
85.0%
Total # AIRS Data Records
# of Null Codes
# of Values
# Values w/out flags
if V I / fl
ff VdlUcb W/ lldyb
Count
163,509
13,029
150,480
139,056
% of Total
8.0%
92.0%
85.0%
7 0%
% of Values
100%
92.4%
7 6%
Figure 2.6 Breakdown of flagged, unflagged and null data codes in AIRS
Page -12-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Completeness - Collocated Precision
Completeness - Precision
Data Capture by Quarter, 2000
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
Goal (25% of FRM SLAMS Sites) W/ Precision Data 73% or more Precision]
Twenty five percent of the monitoring
sites for a reporting organization are
required to provide collocated data at a
frequency of every 6 days (-15 values
per quarter). Figure 2.7 provides
completeness information for collocated
data in AIRS as of 7/11/01.
Attachment 4-2 provides completeness
statistics by EPA Region and by site.
Of the 906 SLAMS reporting in all 4
quarters, approximately 227 sites should
have reported collocated precision data
for CYOO. This is not an exact
calculation since the actual number of
required collocated sites are determined
on a reporting organization/method
designation basis. However, for this assessment, 227 collocated sites will be used as an estimate of
25% of the monitoring network. In CYOO, 51% or 116 sites met the completeness requirement in all
four quarters; a marked improvement over the CY99 value of 10%. For the quarterly estimates in
Figure 2.7, a benchmark value was generated as 25% of the sites that operated in that quarter (e.g.
230 for quarter 1). The second column (Fig 2.6) for each quarter provides information on sites
reporting any precision values. The last column for each quarter reports sites that have at least 73%
(11 or more collocated measurements per quarter) of the expected precision data. Table 2-2 provides
the completeness percentages for the year and on a quarterly basis.
Table 2-2 Yearly and Quarterly Precision Completeness Summary.
• 972 FRM SLAMS operated in 2000; 906 FRM SLAMS operated in all 4 quarters
• Precision required at 25% of sites; completeness goal = 227 sites
• 116 sites (51% of goal) have 4 complete quarters (> 73%).
Figure 2.7 Completeness of collocated precision data.
SLAMS Sites
Data Type (base value)
Collocation Precision (227)
Sites Meeting overall
completeness requirements for
all 4 quarters
%
51%
Number
116
% Sites meeting 75%
Completeness
for Each Quarter
1
78%
2
76%
3
85%
4
79%
Page -13-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Number of sites reporting precision data in...
Only 1 quarter
Any 2 quarters
Any 3 quarters
All 4 quarters
Figure 2.8 presents a breakdown of the number
of sites providing any precision data (not
necessarily meeting the completeness statistic)
in various combinations of quarters.
Another goal was to establish 80% of the
collocated monitors at the sites that the State,
local and tribal monitoring organization felt
would provide annual averages at
concentrations > 90% of the annual or 24-hour
NAAQS (if that is affecting the area). Table 2-
3 provides this information. 423 sites had
CYOO mean concentrations > 13.5 |ig/m3, but
only 53% of the collocated precision sites had CYOO mean concentrations > 13.5 |ig/m3. Since some
reporting organizations may not have any or only few sites reporting average annual concentrations
>13.5 |ig/m3 it was not expected that 80% percent of the collocated sites in the network would have
average annual concentrations >13.5 jig/m3. It appears that some reporting organizations can relocate
collocated monitors to sites near or exceeding the NAAQS. OAQPS will attempt to reduce the
collocated monitoring requirement from 25% to 15% in CY02. If this occurs, it is suggested that
monitoring organizations discontinue collocated sites with mean concentrations <13.5 |ig/m3, thereby
helping to achieve the 80% requirement.
Table 2-3 Total and Percentages of Precision Sites Located at Sites Around the Annual NAAQS
Figure 2.8 Breakdown of precision completeness
Of 972 routine sites
where...
CYOO mean> 13.5 Lig/m3
CYOO mean < 13.5 Lig/m3
Total
Count
423
549
% of
Total
44%
56%
Of 260 precision data
sites where..
CYOO mean> 13.5 ug/m3
CYOO mean < 13.5 ug/m3
Precision
Count
138
122
% of Total
53%
47%
Completeness - Flow Rate Accuracy
Data Capture by Quarter, 2000
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
I Goal (All FRM SLAMS Sites)
W/ Accuracy Data
• 972 FRM SLAMS operated in 2000; 906 FRM SLAMS operated in all 4 quarters
• Flow rate required at all sites; completeness goal = 906 sites
* 519 sites (57% of goal) have 4 quarters of flow rate accuracy data
Figure 2.9 Completeness of flow rate accuracy data.
Completeness - Flow Rate Audits
The States and local monitoring
organizations are required to perform and
submit flow rate accuracy audits on all their
routine samplers every quarter. Figure
2.9 presents the completeness of this
information. Attachment 5-2 provides
listings of flow rate audit completeness by
EPA Region as well as State and site.
Based on active SLAMS sites operating in
all 4 quarters of CYOO, 906 sites should
have reported flow rate audits in every
quarter. 519 sites or 51% of the network
Page -14-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
met this goal which is a substantial improvement over the 18% meeting the goal in CY99. Table 2-4
provides a summary of completeness for the annual and quarterly level. Since only one accuracy value
is required for each site in a quarter, the site for any one quarter is either complete or it is not. The
percentage of sites reporting flow rate audits is around 75% for each quarter
Table 2-4 Flow Rate Completeness Summary
SLAMS Sites
Data Type (base value)
Flow Rate Accuracy (906)
Sites Meeting overall
completeness requirements for
all 4 quarters
%
57%
Number
519
% Sites meeting 75%
Completeness
for Each Quarter
1
68%
2
74%
3
76%
4
72%
*•
Number of sites reporting accuracy data in...
Bzero quarters
Only 1 quarter
EH Any 2 quarters
D Any 3 quarters
D All 4 quarters
Figure 2.10 reports the number of sites reporting any
accuracy data (not necessarily meeting the
completeness statistic) in various combinations of
quarters.
Figure 2.10 Breakdown of flow rate audit data
Completeness - Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) and Routine Data Bias Pairs
Similar to the collocated precision completeness goal, the completeness goal of the PEP was to collect
data from 25% of each method designation in a reporting organization at a frequency of once per
quarter. Using the number of SLAMS sites reporting data in all 4 quarters in CYOO (906), -227 sites
would require a performance evaluation. This is not an exact calculation since the actual number of
performance evaluation sites must be determined on a reporting organization/method designation basis.
However, for this assessment, an initial goal of 227 performance evaluation sites is used. The
completeness for the PEP program is slightly different since completeness is based on two different
organizations collecting the data, the Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT) contractors who
collect the PEP data, and the monitoring organizations, who collect the routine data. Therefore,
completeness will be discussed based upon PEP data completeness and then the completeness of the
bias pairs.
PEP Data Completeness -
Figure 2.11 represents the PEP data completeness. The PEP completeness goal required that 75% of
the samples (3 out of the 4 expected samples) be valid for each site. In addition, it was a goal to visit
the sites in all four quarters. Table 2-5 presents the evaluation of these completeness goals. The goals
Page-15-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
300
CYOO Completeness
Performance Evaluation Program
7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
234
Quarters
Benchmark D 75% Goal D Valid PEP Values
Figure 2.11 Completeness of the PEP
are based on the overall goal of 227 sites
mentioned above. Table 2-5 indicates
that a total of 284 sites were visited in
2000, which is greater than the goal of
227. However, 15 sites had only one or
two PEP visits and therefore did not
meet the goal of at least 3 visits per year.
Also, 17 sites were visited in fewer than
3 quarters and therefore did not meet the
goal of having each quarter represented.
The shaded portion of the table indicates
the sites that meet the requirement of at
least 3 visits. Although 2 sites were
visited in just 2 quarters, a total of 269
were visited at least 3 times in CYOO.
Thus the PEP completeness is 119% .
Table 2-5 CYOO PEP Site Completeness
Frequency
1 or 2 PEP visits
3 PEP Visits
4 PEP Visits
> 4 PEP Visits
Total Sites
Total Samples
Number of Quarters Visits Were Made
1
Quarter
7
0
0
0
7
11
2
Quarters
8
0
2
0
10
24
3
Quarters
NA
35
26
1
62
214
4
Quarters
NA
NA
185
20
205
840
Total
Sites
15
35
213
21
284
Site with
>3 visits
269 |
Valid
Samples
27
105
852
105
. .
1 1089 II
PEP/Routine Sample Completeness -
For every PEP sample there must be a corresponding valid routine value to be able to calculate bias.
Figure 2.12 illustrates that completeness of valid pairs of PEP/routine data pairs. The third column in
each quarter of Figure 2.12 provides the number of paired PEP/routine sample pairs as of 7/11/01.
Table 2-6 provides a breakout of these paired values. Out of the 284 sites with valid PEP data (from
Table 2-5), 270 sites have data to pair with the PEP data, of which 243 sites have at least 3 pairs. This
243 sites with at least 3 pairs provides a completeness of 107% when compared to the 227 site goal
(25% of routine sites operating all 4 quarters). If one looks at the last column in each table, of the 1089
valid PEP values (Table 2-5), there are 941 (Table 2-6) that have a non-null routine sample match in
Page -16-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
300
w 200
'o
0)
S3
I 100
CYOO Completness
PEP/Routine Data Pairs
7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
Benchmark
232
102%
234
Quarters
75% Goal Q Valid PEP/Routine Pairs
AIRS, which leaves 148 PEP values
without a routine value. This is close to
100% better than in CY99 where there
were 287 values that did not have a
routine match. Possible reasons for
missing values could be due to PEP or
routine samples taken on different days
or data not yet entered into AIRS. The
missing 145 values account for 13% of
the performance evaluation information.
Figure 2.12 Completeness of PEP/routine pairs
Table 2-6 CYOO Paired PEP/Routine Data
Frequency
1 or 2 Pairs
3 Pairs
4 Pairs
> 4 Pairs
Total Sites
Total Samples
Number of Quarters Visits Were Made
1
Quarter
6
0
0
0
6
7
2
Quarters
21
1
2
0
24
53
3
Quarters
NA
83
26
1
110
358
4
Quarters
NA
NA
127
3
130
523
Total
Sites
27
84
155
4
270
Sites with
>3 pairs
Valid
Samples
49
252
620
| 20
243 l|
ml
Precision - Collocated Sampling
All precision data were aggregated to provide a national estimate. Figure 2.13 provides estimates of
precision for calendar years 1999 and 2000 for comparison. Figure 2.13 presents a national estimate
as described in 40 CFR 58 where pairs that have one or both concentration values less than or equal to
6 jig/m3 removed. For CYOO all quarters have met the DQO of 10% coefficient of variation.
OAQPS evaluated precision by manufacturer (e.g. Andersen, R&P, and BGI). Figure 2.14 presents
the precision estimates of the three manufacturers of the FRMs. Single and sequential sampler
estimates are combined (weighted by number of collocated pairs).
The BGI samplers are single channel samplers and precision data only average around 50 pairs per
quarter whereas the Andersens average around 3000 pairs and the R&P samplers average around
Page-17-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
CY99 and CYOO Collocated Precision Estimates
Pairs with any values < 6 removed
AIRS extraction 7/26/00 (99) 7/11/01 (00)
10-
§?
O
^
""X^ •
'
CY99
CYOO
1234 Annual
Quarters and Annual Estimates
Figure 2.13 CY99 and CYOO collocated precision extimate
4000 pairs per quarter. Although all
method designations are meeting the
DQOs, the Andersen samplers have
sightly greater imprecision.
At this point it can not be determined
whether this higher imprecision can be
attributed to the function of the sampler
or other phases of the measurement
process. For example the cassette
loading processes between the R&P
and the Andersens are different and one
method could potentially cause more
measurement uncertainty than the other.
OAQPS will continue to review the
precision information over the next year
to see if this trend continues.
In the CY99 QA Report precision
estimates were reported using three
different data bases, one excluding
pairs where one or both
concentrations were < 6 |ig/m3,
another where pairs with percent
difference >50% were removed, and
the third where pairs with large percent
difference or concentrations < 6 |ig/m3
were removed. It was seen that large
percent difference can have a large
impact on the precision estimate. At
times these outliers can be attributed to
data entry errors. Attachment 4-3
presents the quarterly and annual
precision estimates of all method types
with /without outliers removed. During
the CYOO and 01 monitoring years,
quarterly QA reports listed/will list
outliers for monitoring organization to review. Between the interim report based on an April 01 AIRS
extraction and the development of this final QA Report there were corrections made to the outliers in the
AIRS data base. OAQPS will continue to report outliers in the quarterly QA reports for monitoring
agency review.
Reporting Organization Precision
To this point, the discussion about precision has been at the national level. However, the DQO for
precision was established at the reporting organization level. Attachment 4-3 presents estimates of
precision for each reporting organization on a quarterly and annual basis.
CYOO Precision Estimates
by Sampler Type
7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
g '
O
fe*^ -
R&P
Andersen
BGI
1234 Annual
Quarters and Annual Estimate
Figure 2.14 CYOO precision by sampler type.
Page-18-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
Also included in the attachment is information about the precision for each of the collocated sites within
the reporting organization. The site-level precision is being provided to help focus resources on sites
where the data appear to be more variable, so that the cause of the increased variability can be
understood and hopefully reduced. Due to the lack of data in some cases, precision at a reporting
organization level, and even more so at the site level, may be based on very few values and hence the
aggregate precision may not accurately reflect the true, underlying precision.
The number of pairs behind each of the precision estimates is presented in Attachment 4.3. Also
included in the attachment are confidence intervals for each of the precision estimates. Preferably, the
interval should be small and be entirely below 10%. If the interval is not small, there may be several
reasons. These reasons include:
(a) There are few observations being used to estimate precision and its confidence interval
One or both of the instruments at the site are imprecise.
There is a consistent difference between the two samplers. For example, one of the samplers
may consistently be 10% above the other one. Such consistent differences elevate the precision
estimate. The final columns of Attachment 4-3 provide an estimate of this consistent difference.
For example, an estimated relative difference of-8.6% means that the concentration measured
by the collocated sampler is 8.6% lower than the concentration measured by the routine
sampler, on average. Confidence intervals for the relative differences are provided in the final
columns of the attachment. If a precision estimate is large, the relative difference should be
checked. If the relative difference is large, then one or both of the instruments likely is biased.
A combination of any of the above can be causing the large interval.
(b)
(c)
(d)
Plot of Routine vs. Collocated Concentrations
Based on AIRS Extraction dated 07/11/01
State = XX Reporting Organization YY
20 30 40
Routine Concentration
50
One of the suggestions in the CY99
QA Report was to provide a more
visual representation of precision.
Therefore the precision data generated
by reporting organization has been
graphed. Figure 2.15 provides an
example of the graphs. Since there are
a large number of graphs, they have
been placed in a file on the PM2 5
AMTIC bulletin board.
(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic)
Figure 2.15 Example of a reporting organization precision graph
Accuracy - Flow Rate Audits
There are two acceptance criteria for flow rate: 1) the flow rate measured by the FRM must be within
4% of the flow rate measured by an independent transfer standard, and 2) the flow rate measured by
the FRM instrument must be within 5% of the 16.67 L/min design flow rate. The accuracy data from the
Page-19-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO QA Report
November 2001
flow rate audits indicates that the Federal Reference Method samplers are operating within the
acceptance requirements. Table 2-7 provides a summary of the instruments providing flow rate data to
AIRS as of the 7/11/01 extraction date. At a national level, about 96% of the audits met the 4% and
98% met the 5% design flow rate criteria. Two method designations, the BGI single and the Andersen
sequential, had a higher frequency of non-acceptance than the other method designations. Due to the
low sample size for the BGI single method, this higher level of failure (4 and 3 audits by each
acceptance criteria) may not be significant. The Andersen sequential audit failures have been steadily
increasing since the 3rd quarter 2000 and OAQPS will be working with the monitoring organizations to
understand the potential causes of this increased failure rate. Attachment 5-3 provides a listing of the
sites/days where the 4% and 5% of the acceptance criteria failed. Note that failures seem to be
concentrated among a few reporting organizations.
Table 2-7 CYOO Flow Rate Summary (as of 7/11/01)
FRM
Instrument
BGI Single
R&P Single
R&P Sequential
Andersen Single
Andersen Sequential
National Estimate
Number of
Audits
47
327
2700
81
719
3874
Number
>+4%
4
11
80
3
70
168
%
>+4%
8.5
3.4
3.0
3.7
9.7
4.3
Number >
+5% 16.67
3
8
37
2
47
97
%
>+5%
6.4
2.4
1.4
2.5
6.5
2.5
Average
Accuracy
-1.52
-0.14
-0.06
-0.65
-0.22
-0.13
Bias- Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data
Bias Estimate
Ai
10
g
ro
0 °
D)
ro
0
-10
CY1 999 and CYOO
rs Extraction 7/26/00 (99) 7/11/01 (200f
rx^
4^^<^=! -
CY1999
CY2000
1234 Annual
Quarters and Annual Estimates
Figure 2.16 CY99 and CYOO bias estimates.
Similar to the evaluation of collocated
precision, a number of estimates were used
to summarize bias using the performance
evaluation data and the routine data
extracted from AIRS on 7/11/01. Figure
2.16 presents the national bias estimates for
CY1999 and 2000 for all method
designations as described in 40 CFR 58
and guidance. The estimates in Figure 2.16
are based on all available pairs, excluding
pairs that had one or both sample
concentrations less than or equal to 6
|ig/m3. For the data available in AIRS, it
appears that the DQO, at a national level, is
being achieved with an overall bias estimate
of-2.26%
Page -20-
-------
PM2.5 CYOO DRAFT QA Report
October 2001
CY99 and CYOO Bias Estimates
Andersen and R & P Sequentials
7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
The 1999 QA Report provided an additional
bias estimate by removing paired bias values
greater than + 50%. Attachment 6-2 reports
the bias estimates based on the CYOO
databases excluding and including the large
percent differences, but in general, the large
percent differences increase the bias estimate by
1 to 4%. Figure 2.17 provides bias estimates
for the two major method designations, the
Andersen sequential and the R&P sequential for
CY1999 and 2000. With the exception of the
first quarter in 1999 the two major method
designations are within the bias DQOs at a
national level of estimation. Last years report
removed outliers that brought the Andersen bias estimate from ~ 25% to 12% bias. One might see a
seasonal trend in the Andersen instruments with the 1st and 2nd quarters having more positive bias
estimates than the 3rd or 4th quarters for both years. The R&P instruments seem to be trending toward a
lower bias. OAQPS will continue to watch this trend for CY01 data.
1234 123
CY1999 and 2000 Quarters
Figure 2.17 CY99 and CYOO Andersen and R&P sequential
bias estimates
As with the precision DQO, the
bias DQO is established at the
reporting organization level.
Attachment 6-2 provides this
information for both 1999 and
2000 data. Bias information is
provided graphically on the
AMTIC Website
(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic).
Figure 2.18 presents an example
of the graphic. Due to the number
of reporting organizations, some
reporting organizations have as
few as 1 paired value. For
reporting organizations with few
pairs, any extreme value(s) can
have a significant effect on the bias
average. It must be remembered that the bias DQO is etsblished at the reporting organization and based
on a 3-year bias estimate.
Plot of Routine vs. Pep Concentrations
Based on AIRS Extraction dated 07/11/01
State = XX Reporting Organization = YY
bu
m~
E en .
§>
c An .
o 4U
"ro
8 •
o 9n -
0 ^U
20% •
^
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
PEP Concentration (ug/m3)
Figure 2.18 Example of bias graphs (CY99 and CYOO) by reporting
organization
Page 21
-------
PM2.5 CYOO DRAFT QA Report
October 2001
Section 3 Conclusions and Recommendations
This section will summarize the evaluation of the data quality indicators and make recommendations in an
effort to improve the ambient air monitoring quality system and the resultant data quality.
Conclusions
Tables 3-1 and 3-2 provide a summary of data completeness and estimates of the primary data quality
indicators. Summary comments about these tables follow.
Table 3-1. National Completeness Summary for CYOO (as of 7/11/01)
Sites
Data Type (base # sites)
Routine Data (1054)*
Collocation Precision (227)
Flow Rate Accuracy (906)
Performance Evaluations
(227)
Performance Evaluation
Pairs (227)
Sites Meeting overall
completeness
requirements for all 4
quarters
%
60%
51%
57%
119%
107%
Number
631
116
519
269
243
% Sites meeting 75% Completeness
for Each Quarter
1
74%
78%
68%
>100%
92%
2
80%
76%
74%
>100%
>100%
3
85%
85%
76%
>100%
>100%
4
83%
79%
72%
>100%
>100%
% States
with ave.
completeness
>75%
72%
62%
62%
81%
* 1054 sites operated FRMs to monitor PM25 in CYOO. The remainder of the table is related specifically to SLAMS
sites. 972 SLAMS sites operated FRMS to monitor PM25 in CYOO, of which 906 operated in all 4 quarters.
Table 3.2. National Estimates of Primary Data Quality Indicators for CYOO (as of 7/11/01)
Data Type
Precision -
Collocation
Accuracy-Flow Rate
Bias - Performance
Evaluations
Acceptance
Criteria
<10%CV
< + 4% Std.
< + 5% Design
<+10%
% of
RO1
Meeting
Criteria
80%
83%
85%2
National
Estimate
6.7%
-0.13%
-2.3
Quarterly Estimate
1
7.3%
-0.30%
0.3%
2
6.9%
0.0%
-1.2%
3
6.2%
0.02%
-4.9%
4
6.2%
-0.24%
-2.9%
RO = reporting organizations
= bias estimated at a State level
Page 22
-------
PM2.5 CYOO DRAFT QA Report
October 2001
PM2.5 Data Completeness
|CY1999(803 sites) D CY2000 (1,054 sites)
Routine Data Completeness - The completeness evaluation is based upon the strictest interpretation
of the completeness requirement in 40 CFR 50, AppNihat a site must collect 75% valid data in every
quarter in order for comparison to the NAAQS. There are other techniques, such as data substitution,
that can be used to allow more information to be used for the NAAQS comparison that are not
evaluated in this report. Therefore, the
60% overall completeness estimate is the
most conservative estimate of
completeness for CYOO. Since the
requirement is based on 4 quarters, the
overall completeness estimate cannot be
higher than the lowest quarterly
completeness percentage. For
comparison, the CY99 completeness
estimate was 24% so there has been
substantial progress made in CYOO.
Figure 3.1 illustrates the change in
completeness statistics for routine data as
well as the data quality indicators from
Figure 3.1 PM2.5 Completeness statistics for CY99 and CYOO. CY99 to CYOO.
Concentration
Flow Rate
Precision
Data Types
"'Complete" = 75% or better data capture in each and every quarter.
PEP
Precision - Collocation
Completeness- The percentage of sites that have met the 75% completeness goal for all 4 quarters is
51 %, a considerable improvement over the 10% reported in CY99. However, ~ 50 % of the
collocated site are not meeting the completeness requirements.
Values around the NAAQS-- In order to focus quality assurance activities around the data most
crucial in decision making, 40 CFR 58 App A Sect 3.5 required that 80% of the collocated monitors be
placed at the sites that the State, local and tribal monitoring organization felt would provide annual
averages at concentrations > 90% of the annual or 24-hour NAAQS (if that is affecting the area).
Presently, only 53% (138 sites) of the collocated sites reporting data are located at sites with annual
means > 13.5 |ig/m3 and there are 423 routine sites with an annual mean > 13.5 ug/m3. Since some
reporting organizations may not have any or only few sites reporting average annual concentrations
>13.5 |ig/m3 it was not expected that 80% percent of the collocated sites in the network would have
average annual concentrations >13.5 |ig/m3. However, if reporting organizations review their routine and
collocated sites (Attachments 2-1 and 2-3) it appears that some reporting organizations can relocate
collocated monitors to sites where precision and bias estimates are most crucial. If OAQPS succeeds in
reducing the collocated requirement from 25% to 15% OAQPS will suggest discontinuing sites that have
means < 13.5 ug/m3.
Precision Results - It must be emphasized that the precision data quality objective (DQO) is based on
three years of precision data (75% complete). Therefore, any one year or any quarter may exceed the
Page 23
-------
PM2.5 CYOO DRAFT QA Report October 2001
criteria and still meet the precision data quality objectives. An early analysis of precision suggests that
the DQO can be achieved at a national level and in most cases, at a reporting organization level.
The national precision estimate is 6.7% CV and is based on 12,177 collocated paired values where both
values are > 6 jig/m3. Outliers (percent differences greater than 50% and not involving either paired
value < 6 jig/m3 ), can be shown to have an effect on precision. In CYOO 74 extreme pairs (0.6 % of
the total collocated pairs) changed the national precision estimate from 6.7 % CV to 5.1% CV.
OAQPS investigated whether there was any significant difference in precision for the various method
designations. Although this did not appear to be the case in 1999, with more data available there may
be some statistically significant differences between Andersen instruments (method codes 119 and 120)
and R&P instruments (method codes 117 and 118). Simple averaging of the quarterly precision
estimates of the Andersen single and sequential instruments yields a precision estimate of 7.8 % CV
while the aggregate estimate of the R&P yields a 6.1% CV. Removing outliers provides precision values
of 6.0 % CV and 4.7% CV for Andersen and R&P respectively. Since there are operational
differences between the instruments (e.g., how filter cassettes are loaded) as well as difference is the
number of paired values going into these averages, it is difficult to discern exactly what might be leading
to these different precision estimates.
Due to suggestions made on improving the CY99 Report, OAQPS has generated precision graphs for
each reporting organization. These graphs are presented on the AMTIC Website
(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmqa.html)
Based upon a re-evaluation of the PM2 5 data quality objectives which demonstrated that precision had
less effect on decision errors than originally estimated, OAQPS will suggest reducing the collocated
precision requirement from 25% of routine sites to 15%. OAQPS feels that if completeness can be
maintained at this lower level of data collection it can still make precision estimates at the reporting
organization with an appropriate level of confidence.
Fifteen of the 118 reporting organizations are not meeting the precision DQO of 10% and 9 are not
reporting data to evaluate precision. This means that 80% of the reporting organizations are meeting the
precision DQO.
Accuracy -Flow Rate
Completeness- Flow rate accuracy overall completeness was 57% in CYOO compared to 18% in
CY99. A positive or negative bias in flow rate can have a direct effect on the cut point of the particulate
matter collected on the filter and also affects the 24 hour air volume estimate that goes into the derivation
of the concentration. OAQPS will continue to make attempts to improve the capture rate of this data for
future calendar years.
Accuracy Results - For the information available, the results of the accuracy audits are very good. The
national average accuracy estimate is -0.13% which is well within the acceptance criteria of ±4% of the
Page 24
-------
PM2.5 CYOO DRAFT QA Report October 2001
standard and ±5% of the design (see Table 3-2). The percentage of audits meeting the criterion (all
method designations) of ±4% of the standard was 96% and the percentage meeting the criterion of +
5% of the 16.67 L/min design flow rate was 97%. There was some difference between the audit failure
rates of the two major method designations. The Andersen sequential sampler (719 flow audits) failed
the 4% criteria 9.7 % of the time and the 5% design standard 6.5% of the time; whereas the R&P
sequential (2700 flow audits) failed the 4% standard 3% of the time and the 5% design standard 1.4%
of the time. Additionally, it appears that the rates at which the Andersen sequential sampler fails the two
criteria are increasing.
Two of the 118 reporting organizations have an average flow rate that is not within 4% of the audit
device and 18 reporting organizations have no accuracy data reported. This 83% of the reporting
organizations are meeting the 4% standard criterion for flow rate audits.
Bias - Performance Evaluation Program and Routine Data
Completeness - Completeness of the performance evaluation data is a little more complicated because
it involves two data points that are collected by different organizations. The bias estimate must rely on
Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) data collected by technical support contractors provided
through the EPA Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT) contract. The routine PM2 5 data is
collected by the State, local and Tribal Nations. The PEP achieved its completeness requirement by
collecting complete valid data at 269 sites, which was over the anticipated 227 sites (25% of the 906
SLAMS sites operating in all 4 quarters). However, when the data for these 269 sites were matched
with their respective routine data in AIRS, 243 sites produced valid site/pairs that met the completeness
requirement. If one looks at actual valid samples that were taken, of the!089 valid PEP values, 941
have a routine sample match in AIRS, meaning that 148 valid PEP values (14% of PEP data) are not
matched with a routine sample. In 1999 there were 287 values without a match so there has been a
marked improvement in pairing PEP data with routine data.
Bias results
As with precision, the bias data quality objective is based on three years of bias data (75% complete).
At a national level, the average bias is estimated at -2.2% and it appears that the bias data quality
objective is being met. Since 2 years of data have been collected, OAQPS is gaining more confidence
in the bias estimates. One trend that is noticed is the 2000 national bias estimate is more than 3
percentage points lower than the 1999 bias estimate of 1.7%. OAQPS will continue to watch for this
over CY01. It appears that outliers and method designation are still influential.
Since the data sets for the bias estimates for any quarter and in some cases annual averages for some
method designations are fairly small, outliers can have an effect. An outlier for this report was defined as
any paired values that had a percent difference of > + 50%. For the Andersen sequential method
designation, the removal of 4 outliers from the annual estimate (217 pairs to 213) changed the bias
estimate from 2.17% to 0.65%. Removing 5 outliers (506 pairs to 501) from the R&P sequential pairs
changed the annual bias estimate from -4.1% to -4.73%.
As illustrated above there was some difference in the annual bias estimates for the Andersen sequential
(2.17%) and R&P sequential (-4.1%) yet both are well within the +10 DQO. On a quarterly basis,
Andersen sequential bias estimates appear more variable than the R&P sequential bias estimates.
Page 25
-------
PM2.5 CYOO DRAFT QA Report October 2001
Similar to collocated precision, bias graphs were developed for each reporting organization. These
graphs are placed on the AMTIC Website (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmqa.html)
Sixty-two percent of the reporting organizations have average biases within the DQO, that is, between -
10% and +10%. Fourteen percent of the reporting organizations have estimated biases for CYOO that
are not with the DQOs. In general, the reporting organizations with estimated CYOO biases larger than
10% are operating Andersen single or sequential samplers and reporting organizations with estimated
CYOO biases less than -10% are operating R&P sequential samplers.
Recommendations
The following recommendations are made in order to improve the capture rate of information and
improve the PM2 5 quality system over the next year.
Completeness improvement- This QA Reports represents the second full year of sampling.
Completeness statistics for routine sampling as well as precision and flow rate should be higher. OAQPS
recommends a concerted effort to meet the completeness requirements for CY01.
Quarterly Assessments- OAQPS will continue to develop interim quarterly QA summaries and place
these on AMTIC. Many of these assessments will be similar to those found in the attachments. OAQPS
will also identify outliers either through the new AIRS critical data review reports or through this
assessment in order to ensure the effect of outliers on data quality is minimized. In addition to reviewing
data completeness, OAQPS will use the quarterly assessments to continue monitoring three potential
trends in the estimates of data quality:
1. the higher imprecision values in Andersen samplers,
2. the increasing failure rate of the flow rate audits for Andersen sequential samplers, and
3. the downward trend in bias estimates, especially for R&P sequential samplers.
Reduction in collocated precision sampling requirement- Based upon a re-evaluation of the PM2 5
data quality objectives, OAQPS will recommend reducing the precision collocation requirement from
25% to 15%. OAQPS would like to institute this reduction prior to the start of CY02.
Relocation of collocated monitors - It is recommended that collocated monitors at low concentration
sites be moved to sites whose annual mean is > 13.5 |ig/m3. Each reporting organization should try to
locate 80% of their monitors within 90 to 110% of the NAAQS (13.5 to 16.5 |ig/m3).
Page 26
-------
Attachments
The following attachments are included:
Attachment Title
1 Manipulation of Data for Estimation of Completeness, Precision, Bias and Accuracy
2 PM2.5 Routine Data Completeness
2-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
2-2 Data Completeness by State and Site ID
3 PM2.5 Data Flags
1) Flag Definitions
2) Data Qualifiers by State
3) Null Data Flags by State
4 PM2.5 Precision
4-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
4-2 Collocated Precision Data Completeness
4-3 Collocated Precision Estimates
1) Quarterly National Precision Estimates by Method Designation
2) Number of Pairs in National Precision Estimate by Method Designation
3) Collocated Precision Estimates Aggregated by
Region/State/Reporting Organizations/Method Designation
5 PM2.5 Accuracy (Flow Rate)
5-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
5-2 Flow Rate Audit Data Completeness
5-3 Flow Rate Data Summaries
1) Annual Flow Rate Data Summary
2) Quarterly Flow Rate Summary
3) Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check
4) Site/Days with True or Measured Flow Rate >5% of 16.67 1/m
5) Site/Days with True or Measured Flow Rate >10% of 16.67 1/m
6 PM2.5 Bias (Performance Evaluation Program)
6-1 Bias Completeness Estimates
1) Bias Completeness Estimates for CY 99 and CY2000
2) Number of pairs by Region/ State/ Year/Site
6-2 Bias Estimates
1) National Bias Estimates
2) Bias Estimates by State/Reporting Organization
-------
Attachment 1
Manipulation of Data for Estimation of Completeness, Precision, Bias and
Accuracy
-------
Calculations for Summary Statistics in Columns of Table 3 of Executive
Summary
Table 3 in the QA Reports executive summary summarizes the completeness and data quality indicators
by EPA Region for CYOO data. The completeness statistics and the estimated bias are presented at the
state level only. The estimated precision and accuracy are provided at the reporting organization and
state levels. Data from both complete and incomplete sites are used to estimate the data quality
indicators. For states that are entirely one reporting organization, only the state level information is
applicable. If no data have been reported to AIRS, the completeness columns will have 0%
completeness and 0 for the number of complete sites and the data quality estimates will have ND (no
data) indicated.
For data completeness, highlighted boxes indicate that the state has an average data completeness that
is less than 75%. For the data quality estimates, highlighted boxes indicate that the state and/or
reporting organization has a precision estimate that is > 10%, a bias estimate that is > 10% or < -10%,
or an average % difference for accuracy that is > 4% or < -4%.
Following are detailed descriptions of how each of the fields of Table 3 are computed.
Average % Completeness for Routine: Determine the percent complete for each site for each quarter of
CYOO in which the site was operational. A site is considered to be operating in a quarter if the
monitoring record shows that the site started before the quarter and ended after the quarter. The
percent complete is estimated by using the data to infer the sampling frequency and then, using that
data-derived sampling frequency, dividing the number of samples taken on the national sampling
schedule by the number of samples that should have been taken. For each site, the annual average
completeness is estimated by averaging the quarterly completeness, but only those quarters for which
the site was reporting data to AIRS for the entire quarter. Finally, state-level percent completeness is
estimated by averaging the site-level, annual percent completeness. Data substitution, make-up days,
and unscheduled samples are included in the estimates of completeness, as described in the following
completness estimation section. SLAMS only are included in the counts. Also, if multiple samplers are
operating at a site, completeness for only the primary sampler (lowest POC) is included in the statistic.
Number complete sites/Number operating sites for Routine: The number of complete sites is the
number of sites that operated in all 4 quarters and have at least 75% completeness in each quarter. The
number of operating sites is the number of sites with monitoring records that indicate the site started
before or during CYOO and ended during or after CYOO.
Average % Completeness for Precision: Completeness is first calculated for each site/quarter. This is
computed as the number of pairs divided by 15, the approximate number of required pairs per quarter.
A pair is counted whether it occurred on the national sampling schedule or not. The site/quarter
precision completeness statistics are capped at 100%. Thus, if a site had 20 pairs in a quarter, its
completeness is capped to 100%. The state-level average % completeness is estimated by averaging
all the site/quarter completeness statistics.
-------
Number complete sites/Number operating sites for Precision: The first number in this column is the
number of sites in the state that have complete precision data (at least 11 pairs, whether on the correct
sampling date or not) in all 4 quarters. The second number is the number of sites required to have
collocated samplers and is estimated by taking 25% of the number of sites that operated in all 4
quarters. The number of required precision sites is underestimated since the 25% collocation
requirement is at the reporting organization / method designation level, not at the state level.
Average % Completeness for Bias: For each site, the number of PEP/routine pairs in CYOO is divided
by 4 to estimate the annual percent complete. If the percent complete is > 100%, it is capped at
100%. That is, a site with 5 PEP/routine pairs is said to be 100% complete, not 125% complete.
These site-specific, annual completeness statistics are averaged to estimate the state-level average
percent complete.
Number of complete sites/Number of operating sites for Bias: The first number in this column is the
number of sites in the state that have 3 or more pairs of PEP/routine data in the year, regardless of the
number of quarters represented. The second number is the same as the second number for precision.
Average % Completeness for Flow Rate: To calculate the annual percent complete for flow rate for
each site, the number of quarters with flow rate data is divided by the number of quarters the site
operated. Then, these site-level annual completeness estimates are averaged to get the state-level
average percent complete.
Number of complete sites/Number of operating sites for Flow Rate: The first number in this column is
the number of sites in the state that reported flow rate audits in at least 75% of the quarters in which the
site was operated. The second number is the same as the second number for routine.
Rep Org: Reporting organization number or "ALL" to represent the entire state. For states that are
entirely one reporting organization, there is only one row of information.
Prec (% CV): This is the precision estimate for the state or reporting organization and is calculated
according to 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A. Basically, to aggregate the data, a coefficient of variation is
calculated for each site/day and these are squared, then averaged, and then a square root is taken.
Pairs where one or both of the concentrations is <6 • g/m3 are not included in the precision estimate.
Bias (%): This is the bias estimate for the state and is calculated according to 40 CFR Part 58
Appendix A. Basically, to aggregate the data, a bias is calculated for each site/day and these are
averaged. Pairs where one or both of the concentrations is <6 • g/m3 are not included in the bias
estimate.
Accuracy (Flow Rate^ Average % Diff: This is the average percent difference in actual and indicated
flow rate for the state or reporting organization. This is calculated according to 40 CFR Part 58
Appendix A. Basically, to aggregate the data, a relative percent difference is calculated for each
site/day and these are averaged.
-------
Accuracy (Flow Rate) % > 4%: This is the percentage of the flow rate audits for which the relative
percent difference is > 4% or < -4%.
Accuracy (Flow Rate^ % > 5% of Design Flow: This is the percentage of actual or indicated flow rates
> 5% of 16.67 liters/min or < -5% of 16.67 liters/min.
Completeness Estimation - Routine and Quality Assurance Data
For this report, data completeness was computed for the routine 2000 Federal Reference Method
(FRM) data, for 2000 precision information, for 2000 accuracy transactions, and for 2000 bias data
extracted from AIRS on 7/11/01.
Routine Data Completeness Estimation Procedure
The following statement is made in 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix N Section 21:
" For the annual PM25 standard, a year meets data completeness requirements when 75
percent of the scheduled sampling days for each quarter have valid data. However,
years with high concentrations and more than a minimal amount of data (a least 11
samples in each quarter) shall not be ignored just because they are comprised of quarters
with less than complete data... "
Completeness was computed as prescribed for the NAAQS per the following references: 1) CFR, 2)
Guideline on Data Handling for the PM NAAQS, and 3) Use of Make-up PM Samples to Replace
Scheduled PM Samples. The specific computations, caveats, and rationale employed for this report
are described below. All utilized data were extracted from AIRS on 7/11/01. This date allowed
several State updates beyond the official July 1 'certification' deadline. The listing that is referred to in
the following information can be found as Attachment 2-1.
• Completeness was computed on an individual site basis. Only data for Primary POC's (the lowest
number POC ~ generally ' 1') were used.
• A sample frequency was derived for each site-quarter. The quarterly frequency was computed as:
mode (days between samples). If the mode was not equal to 1 (every day) or 3 (every 3rd day), a
default of 6 (every 6th day ~ the least stringent frequency) was used. Some of these data-derived
frequencies were 'corrected' with feedback received from Regions, States, and MQAG staff.
There was no attempt to reconcile the utilized frequencies with the CFR requirements (based on
MSA population).
• Null data codes were not counted as valid samples but were used to ascertain sampling frequency.
Flagged data were considered valid for the purpose of data completeness.
• Completeness percentages were based on the entire calender year 2000; that is, monitors were
assumed to have operated (or have been able to operate) the full year. There were no adjustments
made for later start-up or for monitor closings. MQAG recognizes that some monitors did begin or
end operating sometime during the year and thus, the calculated completeness percentages may not
-------
accurately portray actual 'performance'. The full-year approach was used (as opposed to the
partial-year method) so that the results would more closely coincide with NAAQS usage
requirements.
• The official EPA 2000 3-day and 6-day monitoring schedules were used to ascertain scheduled
sampling days
• 'Make-up' logic was incorporated as stipulated in reference 3: Missed samples on an 'every 3rd
day' schedule were counted as taken if an extra ('make-up') sample was reported 1, 2, or 7 days
later. Missed samples on an 'every 6th day' schedule were counted as taken if an extra sample was
reported 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 7 days later. The number of replacement samples permitted in any
quarter was limited to no more than 5. Some concessions to these 'guidelines' were granted on
request.
• Limited data substitution logic was incorporated in this iteration. States will be permitted to show
Annual NAAQS attainment (over a 3-year period) using quarters less than 75 % but at least 50%
complete by substituting maximum quarterly values or collocated PM2.5, PM10, or TSP for their
missing data. In this completeness iteration, collocated non-null FRM PM2.5 data was substituted
for missing data at the primary sampler wherever possible (even in cases where the un-substituted
capture percentage was less than 50%).
• Extra 'unscheduled' samples were included in the completeness computations by adding the
applicable number to the numerator and denominator of the equation. For actual NAAQS usage
this approach may be unacceptable, especially if the extra samples were purposely taken all near
the end of the quarter, on low concentration days, etc. By adding these samples to the numerator
and denominator, we are basically allowing the monitor to temporarily shift sampling frequencies to
'every day sampling'.
• The final formula used for computing completeness was:
(# of scheduled samples taken) + (# of make -up samples) + (# of substituted _samples) +(# of unscheduled samples taken)
Completenesssite- quarter =
(# of scheduled samples) + (# of substituted _samples) +(# of unsche duled samples taken)
• For quarters with 15 scheduled samples on an every 3rd day schedule, a capture of 11 samples was
counted as 'complete' even though the capture rate is slightly lower than 75% (11/15 = 73%).
• Since non-attainment of the Annual NAAQS can be determined with as few as 11 samples in a
quarter (which could be as little as 12% of the number of required samples), a metric using the 11
sample cutoff was included in the listings and charts.
Collocated Precision Completeness Estimation Procedure
Information used to compute PM2.5 precision and associated completeness were culled from 2 sources,
from the AIRS precision area (polled via an AMP250 - P/A Monitor Raw Data retrieval) and from the
AIRS raw data area (polled via an AMP350 - Raw Data Listing retrieval). Precision data are
supposed to be submitted to AIRS with transaction type 8 and, hence, be deposited in the former area.
However, since there has been some confusion with regards to this requirement, additional paired data
were retrieved from the latter area and results merged. Both AIRS data extractions were performed on
7/11/01. Below are some additional details of the precision completeness analysis. The listing that is
-------
referred to in the following information can be found as Attachment 2-3.
• Per CFR (40, Ch. 1, Pt. 58, App. A, Sec. 3.5.2), each PM2.5 Reporting Organization is required
to collocate 25% (but at least 1) of their FRM SLAMS monitors for the purpose of calculating
measurement precision. State summary lines in the precision completeness report show the total
number of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in 2000 [the number of sites where the primary FRM
sampler has a Monitor Type='2'], the number of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in all 4 quarters
of 2000, the number of SLAMS sites where collocation was required [25% of the total that
operated in all 4 quarters], the number of SLAMS sites reporting precision information, and the
number of SLAMS sites with 4 complete quarters of precision information. MQAG recognizes
that States and Reporting Organizations are not totally synonymous.
• In last year's precision completeness run, sites were given credit for all 'attempts' to run collocated
instruments on a particular day, even if one (or both) of the samples was invalidated. That is, null
codes did not reduce data completeness. This year, however, sites were only given credit if both
samples were valid.
• Completeness percentages were based on whole quarters of calender year 2001. On the listing,
sites were only held accountable for quarters starting with the first one in which routine information
were reported. If a site's first reported 2001 routine FRM data point occurred in the 2nd quarter,
the site was not expected to produce precision information until that quarter. Blanks on the site
listing are different from zeroes. Blanks indicate no precision data present but no FRM data
reported either in that quarter. Zeroes indicate no precision data reported but routine FRM data
are present that quarter. Completeness percentages for the 'initial' quarters were not prorated
according to when in the quarter that 1st FRM point occurred; the denominator for the ratio was the
whole quarter (number of every 6th days).
• CFR requires a 6-day sampling schedule for precision collocation. Some organizations / sites
collocated more frequently and some used schedules different from the official EPA 2001 6-day
monitoring schedule. Although adherence to that schedule (at a minimum) is preferred, this
completeness evaluation only looked at the total number of valid pairs reported in the quarter, no
matter what the schedule. In the attached site listing, a count is provided (by quarter) of the number
of total pairs reported. This was the numerator for the capture percentage. Although some
quarterly 6-day schedules yielded 16 possible precision pairs, a denominator of 15 was always
used. (In cases where 16 or more pairs were actually reported, the completeness statistic was
capped at 100%.)
• Totally complete sites (defined as ones that reported 73% or more [11/15=73%] in each quarter)
are flagged.
• A flag is also provided on the listing to indicate if the site's corresponding 2000 annual mean is
greater or equal to 13.5 ug/m3. CFR notes that during the initial deployment of the PM2.5
network, special emphasis for collocation should be placed on sites in areas likely to exceed the
NAAQS. Once areas are determined to be in violation of the NAAQS, 80% of the areas'
collocated monitors are to be deployed at sites with concentration > 90% of the NAAQS or 13.5
ug/m3. In general (Nationwide), it appears that we are falling short of the 80% goal. States may
need to consider moving some of their collocated monitors to higher concentration areas.
-------
Flow Rate Accuracy Completeness Estimation Procedure
Information used to compute PM2.5 accuracy and associated completeness was pulled from the AIRS
accuracy area with an AMP250 - P/A Monitor Raw Data retrieval on 7/11/01. Comments on the
completeness analysis are shown below. The listing that is referred to in the following information can
be found as Attachment 2-4.
• Per CFR (40, Ch. 1, Pt. 58, App. A, Sec. 3.5.7.2), each calender quarter every FRM SLAMS
sampler's flow rate is to be audited at least once with a certified standard. State summary lines in
the accuracy completeness report show the total number of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in
2000 [the number of sites where the primary FRM sampler has a Monitor Type='2'], the number
of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in all 4 quarters of 2000, the number of SLAMS sites where
flow rate checks were required [the number of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in all 4 quarters],
the number of sites reporting accuracy transactions, and the number of sites with 4 quarters of
accuracy data. Again, MQAG realizes that States and Reporting Organizations are not totally
synonymous
• Since only 1 audit was required per quarter and it was either present or not, no actual completeness
percentages were computed. An indicator is shown for each site that reported accuracy
information in all 4 quarters.
• Like precision, sites were only held accountable for quarters starting with the first one containing a
routine FRM data point. Blanks on the site listing are different from zeroes. Blanks indicate no
accuracy data present but no FRM data reported either in that quarter. Zeroes indicate no
accuracy reported but routine FRM data are present that quarter.
• Note that some sites reported more than 1 accuracy check per site-quarter. States are cautioned
that the flow rate standard used for auditing must not be the same flow rate standard to calibrate the
analyzer. Calibration results should not be submitted to AIRS as accuracy transactions.
Performance Evaluation Program Completeness Estimation Procedure
Information used to compute PM2.5 bias and associated completeness is predicated on the
completeness of the routine network in addition to the completeness of the Performance Evaluation
Program (PEP). The completeness of the routine network is described above. The completeness of
the PEP is described in this section.
As per 40 CFR Pt. 58, App. A, Sec. 3.5.3, approximately 25% of each method designation of the
routine sites within each reporting organization are supposed to be visited 4 times in a year by the PEP,
preferably once per quarter. Thus, the PEP is complete if approximately 25% of the PM2.5 monitoring
network is evaluated at least 3 times (75% of 4) in a year. To evaluate completeness of the PEP,
information was pulled from the data bases maintained by the two regional laboratories supporting the
PEP (Region 4 and 10) and from the data base maintained by the RTF laboratory, which supported the
PEP during the early phase. These three data bases were merged together and completeness statistics
were calculated according to the following procedure.
-------
• Any PEP data points with an invalid code (PEVALID=0) were deleted prior to completeness
calculations. That is, only valid PEP data were used to calculate completeness.
• Any PEP data points associated with "parking lot studies" were deleted prior to completeness
calculations, even if the study had a collocated FRM.
• For some site/day combinations, there are multiple observations in the PEP data base. This likely is
due to multiple PEP samplers being run. In such cases, only the first valid observation in the data
base was used.
• Since a site is supposed to be visited by the PEP 4 times within a year, if 3 (75% of 4) or more
visits were made and resulted in valid data, then the site was considered complete, regardless of
how the visits were spread among the quarters.
Bias Completeness Estimation Procedure
The preceding section describes the completeness of the PEP data base. To estimate completeness of
bias, AIRS routine data is merged with the PEP data base since both a PEP and a routine
concentration are needed to calculate bias. As per 40 CFR Pt. 58, App. A, Sec. 3.5.3, approximately
25% of each method designation of the routine sites within each reporting organization are supposed to
be visited 4 times in a year by the PEP, preferably once per quarter. Thus bias is complete if
approximately 25% of the PM2.5 monitoring network has 3 (75% of 4) pairs of valid PEP and routine
data.
The data used to estimate bias completeness originated from an AMP350 Raw Data Listing extraction
from AIRS on 7/11/01 and from the PEP data base described above. Completeness statistics are
calculated according to the following procedure.
• Only non-null routine data and valid PEP data were used in the calculation of completeness.
• Any PEP data points associated with "parking lot studies" were deleted prior to completeness
calculations, even if the study had a collocated FRM.
• For some site/day combinations, there are multiple observations in the PEP data base or in the
AIRS data base. For the PEP, only the first valid observation was used. For AIRS, the lowest
POC with a valid observation was used.
• If a site has at least 3 (75% of 4) valid pairs of PEP and routine data, then it is considered
complete, regardless of how the visits were spread among the quarters. The percent complete is
calculated as then number of valid pairs divided by 4. The percent is capped at 100%.
-------
Precision, Accuracy and Bias Estimation
Three quality control (QC) procedures, at the national level, will be used to evaluate uncertainty for the
PM2 5 network. All of the statistics can be found in 40 CFR Pt. 58, App. A, Section 5.5.1. The
equation numbers from CFR are included in the discussion for reference.
1. Flow rate checks - Since flow rate is checked against standards of known value, this check
provides estimates of accuracy and/or bias at the instrument level. Following is a description of the
statistics used to estimate accuracy based on the annual flow rate checks.
Accuracy is estimated by using pairs of true and measured values for flow rate. The pairs are for
the same site and same day. Specifically, for a given site and day, if Xt is the audit standard flow
rate and Yf is the measured flow rate, then accuracy (CFR Equation 13) is calculated as
~y. ~\T:
di = — x 100 (Equation 1)
In this report, estimates of accuracy are presented for various levels of aggregation, sometimes
aggregating over time (such as quarterly or annually), sometimes aggregating over samplers (such as
all samplers of a specific method designation), and sometimes aggregating over both time and
samplers (such as annually for a specific method designation). These various levels of aggregation
are achieved using the same basic statistic. This statistic averages the individual accuracy values
from Equation 1 to the desired level of aggregation. Specifically, if w, is the number of flow rate
checks and dhd2, ..., dnj are the resulting accuracy values, then the average accuracy estimate
(CFR Equations 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18) is
D = — x y di (Equation 2)
m
i=l
For this report, average accuracy values (Equation 2) are calculated for each method designation
by quarter and for the entire year. Additionally, the number of flow rate checks that are within 4%
of the audit standard and the number within 5% of the design flow rate of 16.67 L/min are also
calculated.
2. Collocated measurements - Since the true concentrations sampled from collocated samples are
unknown, these checks provide an estimate of precision of the measurement system. However,
the statistic developed to summarize the collocated measurements has one component attributable
to precision and another component attributable to bias. For now, this document describes only the
results for the combined effect for precision and bias. The individual components will be described
at a later date.
Following is a description of the statistics used to estimate precision based on the collocated
instruments. Precision is estimated by using pairs of collocated PM2.5 measurements. The pairs of
measurements are for the same site and same day. Specifically, for a given site and day, if Xi is the
concentration produced from the primary sampler (the routine monitor) and Yf is the concentration
produced from the duplicate sampler (the monitor used for quality control), then the percent
-------
difference (CFR Equation 19) is calculated as
Y'~X'
x 100 (Equation 3)
^
The percent difference from Equation 3 is used to calculate the coefficient of variation for a single
site and day (CFR Equation 20) as follows
Ml
CVi = —=• (Equation 4)
In this report, estimates of precision are presented for various levels of aggregation, sometimes
aggregating over time, sometimes aggregating over samplers, and sometimes aggregating over both time
and samplers. These various levels of aggregation are all achieved using the same basic statistic. This
statistic pools the individual coefficients of variation described above in Equation 4 to the desired level
of aggregation. Specifically, if «,- is the number of pairs and CVj, CV2, ..., CVnJ are the coefficients of
variation for each of the pairs to be pooled, then the precision estimate (approximately CFR Equation
21) is
CV = ]\-£ (Equation 5)
Confidence intervals can be constructed for these pooled estimates of precision in Equation 5 by
using the following equations, one for the lower limit (CFR Equation 22) and one for the upper limit
(CFR Equation 23).
Lower 90% Confidence Limit = CV
Upper 90% Confidence Limit = CV
%o.05,nj
In these equations, Xoo5dfan<^ Xo95dfare ^e ^-^ an<^ 0-95 quantiles of the chi-square
distribution with degrees of freedom (df) equal to «,-.
There are a couple of issues with calculating individual and pooled estimates of precision. (A) In
the equation for the pooled estimate of precision, individual coefficients of variation are squared
before being averaged. If there is a large individual coefficient of variation, it can have a very strong
influence on the resulting pooled estimate. Hence, pooled estimates of precision were calculated
both including all individual coefficients of variation and excluding large coefficients of variation.
The impact of these large values is discussed in Section 2. (B) Comparing one pooled estimate of
precision to another (such as comparing quarterly estimates or comparing one site to another)
requires some care because one estimate may be based on just a few values and hence be less
robust than an estimate based on more values. For comparisons of precision for different times or
-------
10
different places, it is important to look at the upper and lower confidence limits to get an
understanding of how robust the estimates are.
3. Federal Reference Method (FRM) Evaluation - This evaluation is performed by comparing a
monitoring instrument against an instrument that is considered "truth" and can provide an estimate of
measurement system bias. Following is a description of the statistics used to estimate bias.
Bias is estimated by using pairs of PM2.5 measurements, where one of the measurements is from a
routine, State-operated monitor and the second measurement is from a monitor operated as part of
the Performance Evaluation Program. The pairs of measurements are for the same site and same
day. Specifically, for a given site and day, if Xi is the concentration produced from the PEP
sampler and Yt is the concentration produced from the State-operated sampler, then accuracy
(CFR Equation 26) is calculated as
d = Y'~X' x 100 (Equation6)
xi
In this report, estimates of bias are presented for various levels of aggregation, sometimes
aggregating over time, sometimes aggregating over samplers, and sometimes aggregating over both
time and samplers. These various levels of aggregation are achieved using the same basic statistic.
This statistic averages the individual biases described in Equation 6 to the desired level of
aggregation. Specifically, if w, is the number of pairs and dh d2, ..., dnj are the biases for each of the
pairs to be averaged, then the aggregate bias estimate (CFR Equations 27, 31 and 35) is
i rn
X"1
D= — x > di (Equation 7)
Confidence intervals can be constructed for these average bias estimates in Equation 7. Such
intervals require an estimate of the variability of average bias. Since bias likely varies by site and
quarter, the estimate of the variability of the average bias should be based on a pooled estimate of
site/quarter variability. However, the PEP usually evaluates each site just once per quarter, which is
not sufficient for estimating the site/quarter variability. Since site/quarter variability is not estimable
with the current PEP design, the site variability (using all 4 bias estimates for the year) or the quarter
variability (using all sites for a quarter) can be used, with the understanding that these estimates of
variability are confounded with other sources of variability. Specifically, an estimate of the
variability of the average bias is
nj
- • - (Equation 8)
-------
11
The 95% confidence interval for the average bias is then calculated as
Lower95%ConfidenceLimit = D- t0 975 df x s//—
/^nj
Upper 95% Confidence Limit = D +t0 975 d^ x s/>—
where t0 (^75 df is the 0.975 quantile of Student's t distribution with degrees of freedom df = «,- -1
and s as defined in Equation 8.
-------
Attachment 2
PM2.5 Routine Data Completeness
This section covers the following attachments related to routine data completeness:
2-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
2-2 Data Completeness by State and Site ID
-------
Attachment 2-1
Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
-------
Completeness - Routine FRM
Regional Data Capture, 2000
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
Operating D With Data D 75% Complete
200
150
100
50
1 Q3
Quarter 1
CO
M—
O
104 102
69 68
75
70%
66
58
55%
173
152
79%
148
79%
129
123
84
35%
107
64 63
52
61%
72 6753
'4%
no 77
72% 77
72
66
86%
10
200
150
100
50
198
Quarter 2
CO
M—
O
106 106
71 69 53
75%
79
69
175%
71%
161
81%
185
152
81%
132 130
107
63
64 64 98%
65
72 70 90o/0
70
'4% 79
7T
74 90%
10
-------
Completeness - Routine FRM
Regional Data Capture, 2000
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
Operating U With Data U 75% Complete
200
150
100
50
198 1QCJ
Quarter 3
CO
M—
O
105 105
71 69 54
96
,91%
67%
86%
137
107
77%
106
64 64 95%
61 74 73
67
91%
•92-
85
79
70
74 89%
10
200
150
100
50
200-108181 198
Quarter 4
CO
M—
O
105 10590
ZL68 50
70%
79
7057
'2%
191%
168
85%
13^-130116
B5%
108
64 64 95%
61 76 74 64
64%
QA 7ft
72% 82
69
74 84%
# with 4
complete
Quarters:
10
30
28
50
127
114
70
50
43
61
58
-------
Attachment 2-2
Data Completeness by State and Site ID
Field Definitions
STATE:
SITE:
POC:
MT:
Data in AIRS ....
FRM:
Non-FRM Daily:
Non-FRM Hourly:
Date Sampling Began:
Date Sampling Ended:
Date of 1" FRM Data Pt.:
All PM2.5 sites located in the State are listed after the State name
Site Identification Code = State FIPS code (2 char.) + County FIPS code (3 char.) + AIRS Site ID (4
char.)
Parameter Occurrence Code
Monitor Type = '2' (SLAMS), '3' (Other), 'A' (Tribal), "F (Trends Speciation)
[Only data for parameter code 88101 (PM2.5 Local Conditions) was utilized in this listing]
T = Interval '7' (24-hour) data in AIRS (1999, 2000, or 2001) for Federal Reference Methods
(Method Codes 116, 117, 118, 119, and 120)
T = Interval '7' data in AIRS for non-Federal Reference Methods (Method Codes other than other
than 116-120)
'!' = Interval T (hourly) data in AIRS. [Note: All hourly 88101data are currently non-FRM]
AIRS Sampling Began Date
AIRS Sampling Ended Date
The date of the first
FRM data point in
AIRS ~ should
coincide with Date
Sampling Began
1999. 2000. and 2001 Information ....
Q1-Q4 Freq.
All 4 0 75% Complete:
The data-derived Sampling Frequency for each calender quarter = T (every day), '3' (every 3rd day), or
'6' (every 6th day)
The data capture percentage for each calender quarter
' 1' = All 4 quarters have data capture of at least 75% [Exception: Quarters with 'every 6* day'
schedule and 11 samples (73% capture) are considered complete]
All 4 0 w/ 11+ samples:
T = All 4 quarters have at least 11 samples
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
ALABAMA
010030010
010270001
010331002
010491003
010530002
010550010
010690002
010730023
010730023
010731005
010732003
010732006
010735002
010890014
010970002
010970002
010970003
010972005
011010007
011010007
011030010
011130001
011170006
011190002
011210002
011250003
011270002
ALASKA
020200018
020200044
020900010
021100004
021100026
021300008
021700004
021700008
022900003
ARIZONA
040031005
040051008
040070008
040070008
0401 3001 9
040139990
040139991
040139992
040139997
040139997
040139997
040139997
040190011
PQC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
5
6
7
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
31.
21.
21.
31.
31.
31.
21.
21.
T . 1
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
31.
3 . .
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
01.
01.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
3 . .
31.
31.
31.
31.
T . 1
T . 1
T . 1
21.
Date
Began
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
11/10/98
01/01/99
10/23/98
11/19/98
12/18/99
10/28/99
03/04/00
12/19/98
04/10/00
01/12/99
01/06/99
02/11/99
02/11/99
06/13/00
01/06/99
01/21/99
03/19/99
01/01/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt Q1 Fred
05/03/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
05/03/00
05/03/00
01/03/99
01/01/99 1
01/03/99 3
01/01/99 1
01/03/99 3
01/03/99 3
01/03/99 3
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99 3
04/06/99 3
02/18/99 3
04/10/99 3
12/18/99 3
10/28/99 3
03/04/00 3
01/03/99 3
04/12/00
01/12/99
01/06/99
02/11/99
02/11/99
01/06/99
06/09/00 01/21/99
03/19/99
01/06/99
01/06/99 3
Q1% Q2 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
99% 1
100% 3
99% 1
97% 3
100% 3
100% 3
3
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
71% 3
97% 3
87% 3
97% 3
100% 3
100%
32% 3
94% 3
3
97% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
63% 3 87% 3 90%
50% 3 97% 3 67%
67% 3 74% 3 100%
10% 3 87% 3 90%
67% 3 94% 3 97%
63% 3 74% 3 63%
33% 3 65% 3 97%
96% 1 93% 1 97% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
96% 1 98% 1 96% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
63% 3 94% 3 93%
67% 6 93% 6 93%
57% 3 97% 3 80%
63% 3 100% 3 97%
67% 6 100% 6 100%
63% 3 94% 3 63%
40% 3 94% 3 100%
67% 3 81% 3 93%
61% 3 97% 3 70%
57% 3 90% 3 73%
37% 3 94% 3 97%
60% 3 32% 3 0%
100% 3 97% 3 93% . 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
3 97%
93% 3 87% 3 90%
100% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
53% 3 58% 3 97%
77% 3 65% ...
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
040191028
040213002
040230004
040230004
ARKANSAS
050010001
050010001
050010010
050010010
050030003
050030004
050030005
050310001
050310001
050350004
050450002
050450002
050510002
050690005
050890001
050910001
050910004
050930007
051070001
051130002
051150003
051190003
051190007
051190007
051191004
051191008
051191008
051310008
051310008
051390004
051390005
051430003
051450001
CALIFORNIA
060010007
060011001
060011001
060070002
060090001
060111002
0601 30002
0601 30002
060170011
060170011
060170012
060190008
060190008
PQC
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
3 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
Date
Sedan
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
01/07/99
01/07/99
09/14/00
09/14/00
03/26/99
08/14/00
05/07/01
03/12/99
03/12/99
04/01/99
04/28/00
04/28/00
03/09/99
02/18/99
04/02/99
05/05/99
05/05/99
08/24/00
04/05/99
03/30/99
02/26/99
01/06/99
01/22/99
01/22/99
09/08/00
04/02/99
04/02/99
04/01/99
04/01/99
02/22/99
06/14/01
03/15/99
04/01/00
12/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/19/98
01/06/99
12/16/98
01/01/99
12/31/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/06/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
09/14/00 07/05/99
09/14/00 07/05/99
09/15/00
09/15/00
08/14/00 07/05/99
08/16/00
07/05/99
07/05/99
07/02/99
04/30/00
04/30/00
07/05/99
07/05/99
07/02/99
03/09/00
07/05/99
08/28/00
07/11/99
07/05/99
07/05/99
09/08/00 07/05/99
06/30/99
07/05/99
09/09/00
07/02/99
07/05/99
07/05/99
07/11/99
06/14/01 07/05/99
07/02/99
05/06/00
12/02/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/08/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/06/99
Q1 Fred
3
3
6
3
6
6
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
3
3
1
6
1
6
3
6
3
3
3
3
6
6
3
1
6
6
3
1
6
Q1% Q2 Fred
97% 3
88% 3
100% 6
94% 3
69% 6
75% 6
74% 3
6
6
68% 3
81% 6
81% 6
81% 6
94% 3
87% 3
94% 3
97% 3
84% 1
69% 6
74% 1
75% 6
84% 3
75% 6
65% 3
69% 3
6
87% 6
94% 6
100% 6
94% 6
81% 3
84% 6
100% 6
100% 6
89% 3
45% 1
72% 6
Q2% Q3 Fred
100% 3
90% 3
81% 6
3
6
83% 3
3
88% 6
69% 6
83% 3
73% 6
67% 6
93% 3
100% 6
80% 6
56% 6
6
93% 3
97% 3
87% 3
97% 3
98% 1
100% 6
3
100% 1
67% 6
100% 3
93% 6
80% 3
80% 3
33% 6
100% 6
100% 6
100% 6
100% 6
93% 3
100% 6
100% 6
100% 6
100% 3
63% 1
38% 6
Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
65% ...
74% ...
60% ...
16% 3 60%
20% 6 53%
26% ...
29% 3 60%
93% 6 100% . 1
93% 6 80% 1 1
87% 3 53% . 1
100% 6 93%
93% 6 93%
94% 3 93% . 1
100% 6 93% 1 1
81% 6 69% 1 1
53% 6 80%
40% 6 93%
84% 3 97% 1 1
97% 3 90% 1 1
94% 3 100% 1 1
71% ...
90% 1 97% 1 1
100% 6 80% . 1
26% 3 93%
87% 1 98% . 1
87% 6 93%
100% 3 93% 1 1
93% 6 80% 1 1
87% 3 87% . 1
94% 3 70% . 1
93% 6 100%
100% 3 97% 1 1
100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 1 1
94% 6 100% 1 1
94% 3 79% 1 1
100% 1 92% 1 1
100% 6 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 1 1
93% 1 86% . 1
100% 6 87%
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
060190008
060190008
060190008
060190008
060195001
060195025
060231002
060250003
060250005
060250005
060251003
060271001
060271003
060271003
060271003
060290010
060290011
060290012
060290014
060290014
060290014
060290014
060290014
060290014
060290016
060292004
060310004
060310004
060333001
060370002
060370002
060370002
060371002
060371002
060371103
060371103
060371103
060371201
060371201
060371 301
060371 301
060371601
060371601
060372005
060372005
060374002
060374002
060374002
060379002
060450006
060450006
060472510
PQC
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
7
1
2
7
1
1
1
1
2
5
6
7
8
1
7
1
7
1
1
2
7
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
7
1
1
2
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
T . 1
T . 1
2.1
2.1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2.1
21.
2.1
21.
21.
2.1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . .
T . .
2.1
2.1
21.
2.1
21.
2.1
21.
21.
2 . .
2.1
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
2.1
21.
21.
21.
21.
Date
Began
02/09/00
02/09/00
09/01/98
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
09/01/98
09/01/98
01/01/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/01
09/01/98
09/01/98
02/18/00
09/01/98
01/01/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt Q1 Fred Q1% Q2 Fred Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
01/03/99 3 77% 6 80% 6 100% 3 63% . 1
01/13/00 3 84% 6 87% 6 87% 3 83% 1 1
01/08/99 6 81% 6 88% 6 78% 6 94% 1 1
01/03/99 3 61% 3 47% 3 52% 3 90% . 1
01/03/99 3 97% 3 100% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
01G1/01 . ........
01/03/99 3 90% 3 67% 3 94% 3 30%
12G1/99 . ........
01/03/99 . . 3 53% 3 97% 3 90%
01/06/99 . . 6 53% 6 100% 6 87%
10/22/99 . ........
01/03/99 3 100% 6 100% 6 100% 3 100% 1 1
01/03/99 3 32% 3 67% 3 68% 3 77%
06/26/99 3 68% 3 87% 3 81% 3 63% . 1
01/03/99 1 84% 1 92% 1 97% 1 92% 1 1
01/07/99 6 81% 6 73% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
12G1/00 . ........
12G1/00 . ........
02/18/00 3 42% 3 97% 3 100% 3 97% . 1
02/12OO . ........
01/03/99 3 39% 6 87% 6 100% 3 90% . 1
03G1/00 . ........
01/06/99 6 100% .... 6 80%
01/03/99 1 95% 1 97% 1 92% 1 80% 1 1
02/29/00 . ........
01/03/99 3 10% 3 47% 3 84% 3 90%
01/03/99 1 88% 1 92% 1 90% 1 95% 1 1
01/03/99 3 94% 3 90% 3 81% 3 90% 1 1
01/03/99 3 97% 3 100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
01/03/99 3 97% 3 93% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
01/03/99 3 97% 3 93% 3 87% 3 83% 1 1
01/03/99 1 87% 1 91% 1 85% 1 70% . 1
02/29/00 . ........
01/03/99 3 90% 3 90% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
01/07/99 6 100% 6 100% 6 100% 6 73% 1 1
01/12/99 ........
04/12/99 3 97% 6 100% 6 100% 3 93% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
060490001
060510001
060531002
060531003
060531003
060570005
060571001
060571001
060590001
060590001
060590001
060592022
060592022
060610006
060631006
060631008
060631008
060631009
060651003
060651003
060652002
060652002
060652002
060655001
060655001
060658001
060658001
060658001
060658001
060658001
060670006
060670006
060670006
060670010
060670010
060674001
060710014
060710014
060710025
060710025
06071 0306
06071 0306
060712002
060712002
060712002
060718001
060718001
060719004
060719004
060730001
060730003
060730003
PQC
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
5
6
1
2
5
1
7
1
1
7
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
1
1
5
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
31.
3 . .
21.
21.
21.
2.1
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . .
T . .
T . .
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
2.1
21.
21.
2.1
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
2 . .
31.
3 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
T . .
Date
Began
01/12/99
10/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
12/30/98
03/31/99
05/12/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
06/15/99
06/15/99
12/31/98
03/26/99
03/25/99
09/01/98
03/21/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
10/10/99
10/10/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/01
01/03/99
02/17/99
02/09/00
12/13/98
09/01/98
02/02/99
01/01/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/08/99
02/08/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt Q1 Fred Q1% Q2 Fred Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
01/12/99 6 100% 6 93% 6 93% 6 93% 1 1
11/20/00 ...... 3 43%
01/15/99 ........
01/04/00 3 97% 6 80% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
01/03/99 6 75% 6 60% 6 94% 6 60%
03/31/99 3 97% 3 80% 3 94% 3 87% 1 1
05/12/99 6 94% 6 80% 6 88% 6 80% 1 1
01/03/99 1 85% 1 76% 1 53% 1 85% . 1
02/11/99 ........
06/17/99 3 94% 3 100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
01/06/99 6 94% 6 93% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
03/26/99 3 90% 3 88% 3 83% 3 63% . 1
02/09/00 03/25/99 3 0% ......
0206/00 . ........
03/21/00 1 0% 3 54% 3 88% 3 60%
01/03/99 3 90% 3 93% 3 84% 3 97% 1 1
01/03/99 3 97% 3 97% 3 87% 3 97% 1 1
01/01/00 3 100% 3 93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
01/03/99 1 77% 1 85% 1 95% 1 76% 1 1
01/08/99 ........
01/03/99 1 16% 3 50% 3 26% 1 0%
02/17/99 6 94% 6 100% 6 53% 6 0%
01/03/99 1 87% 1 96% 1 89% 1 90% 1 1
01/13/01 . ........
02/02/99 1 88% 3 100% 3 39% 1 0%
01/03/99 ........
01G1/00 . ........
01/03/99 3 87% 3 97% 3 81% 3 100% 1 1
01/01/00 3 87% 3 97% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
01/03/99 3 84% 3 90% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
02/08/99 3 61% 6 73% 6 100% 6 93% . 1
01/03/99 3 81% 3 87% 3 81% 3 53% . 1
01/03/99 3 84% 3 77% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
01/01/99 1 66% 1 88% 1 92% 1 73% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
060730006
060731002
060731007
060731009
060750005
060750005
060771002
060771002
060792002
060798001
060798001
060811001
060811001
060830010
060831007
060831007
060850004
060850004
060850004
060850004
060850004
060852003
060852003
060870007
060870007
060890004
060950004
060950004
060970003
060970003
060990005
060990005
060990005
061010003
061010003
061072002
061072002
061110007
061110007
061110009
061112002
061112002
061113001
061131003
COLORADO
080010001
080010001
080010006
080010006
080010006
080050005
080070002
PQC
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
7
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
3
5
7
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
7
8
1
2
1
7
1
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
2
1
2
5
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
2 . .
21.
2.1
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . .
2 . .
21.
2 . .
T . 1
2.1
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
2.1
3.1
21.
21.
21.
2.1
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . .
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
3 . .
T . 1
21.
31.
Date
Sedan
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/31/99
01/01/99
08/04/99
08/04/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/09/00
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/19/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
09/01/98
09/01/98
12/19/98
12/19/98
01/03/99
09/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
11/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/09/99
01/26/99
01/26/99
01/01/01
01/01/01
02/17/01
03/10/99
03/31/00
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
12G1/00
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
08/04/99
01/06/99
02/29/00
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
02/20/99
01/24/99
01/03/99
12G1/00
12G1/00
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
03/01/00
01/03/99
01/06/99
11/23/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/09/99
04/13/01 01/26/99
04/13/01 04/06/99
01/16/01
03/10/99
06/05/01 04/24/00
Q1 Fred
3
1
1
1
3
6
6
6
3
6
6
1
1
3
6
3
3
3
6
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
6
3
Q1% Q2 Fred
74% 3
66% 1
70% 1
93% 6
91% 3
94% 6
100% 6
100% 6
100% 6
94% 6
100% 6
84% 6
86% 6
90% 6
94% 6
97% 6
100% 6
100% 3
94% 6
94% 6
90% 3
87% 3
94% 6
97% 3
97% 3
97% 3
94% 3
94% 6
75% 3
6
Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
77% 3 87% 3 93% . 1
89% 1 91% 1 87% . 1
64% 1 79% 1 85% . 1
67% 6 100% 1 90%
100% 3 97% 3 86% 1 1
73% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
100% 6 80% 6 100% 1 1
100% 6 80% 6 73% 1 1
100% 6 75% 3 80% 1 1
80% 6 87% 6 27%
93% 6 80% 6 100% 1 1
94% 6 100% 1 80% 1 1
94% 6 73% 1 91% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
67% 6 100% 6 100%
100% 6 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 3 97% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 88% 1 1
94% 6 88% 6 94% 1 1
89% 6 81% 6 94% 1 1
93% 3 94% 3 94% 1 1
97% 3 87% 3 97% 1 1
93% 6 60% 6 80%
3 43%
83% 3 87% 3 67% . 1
83% 3 97% 3 70% . 1
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
75% 6 94% 6 87%
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
0801 MOOS
0801 M01 2
080290004
080310002
080310002
080310013
080310017
080350003
080390001
080410008
080410011
080410011
080510005
080670008
080690009
080770003
080770003
081010012
081070003
0811M004
0812M006
0812M008
PQC
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
31.
21.
3 . . 1
31.
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
31.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
Date
Began
01/22/99
01/M/99
03/31/00
01/01/99
08/25/00
11/15/99
11/15/99
03/31/00
05/28/99
07/02/99
01/19/99
01/19/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
07/10/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
02/20/99
06/23/99
01/01/00
02/13/99
08/04/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/22/99
01/30/99
04/06/00
01/01/99
11/20/99
04/01/00 11/20/99
04/24/00
05/28/99
07/02/99
01/19/99
04/12/99
01/25/00
01/13/00
07/10/99
01/06/99
06/05/99
02/20/99
06/23/99
06/17/00
02/13/99
08/04/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
sux.
100%
100%
79%
91%
88%
87%
91%
94%
88%
75%
81%
100%
100%
100%
97%
94%
100%
Q2 Frea
3
3
6
1
6
3
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
6
3
6
6
3
3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 94% 6 80%
90% 1 90% 1 90% 1 1
1 64%
75% 6 90% 6 100%
94% 3 74% 3 83% . 1
100% 3 91% 3 94% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
81% 6 94% 6 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 88% 1 1
87% 6 94% 6 73% 1 1
91% 3 97% 3 88% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
94% 3 97% 3 84% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 82%
20% 6 100% 6 75%
91% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
88% 3 88% 3 97% 1 1
CONNECTICUT
090010010
090010010
090010010
090010113
090011123
090012124
090013005
090019003
090019003
090031003
090031018
090090018
090090018
090090018
090091123
090091123
090091123
090092123
090092123
090092123
090099005
090113002
DELAWARE
100010002
100010003
100031003
100031007
100031011
100031011
1
2
9
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
9
1
2
9
1
2
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
21.
31.
3 . .
21.
21.
31.
31.
31.
3 . .
21.
21.
21.
31.
3 . .
21.
31.
3 . .
21.
31.
3 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/15/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/16/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
09/15/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
03/16/00
01/06/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
07/02/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
02/11/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
12/16/99 03/10/99
11/15/99 03/10/99
3
3
3
3
3
6
1
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
58%
45%
84%
74%
6%
63%
59%
55%
38%
42%
52%
42%
52%
39%
48%
45%
97%
100%
100%
97%
3
6
3
3
3
6
1
3
1
6
3
6
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
87% 3 94% 3 90% . 1
80% 6 100% 6 88% . 1
3 13% 3 77%
93% 3 97% 3 80% 1 1
83% 3 97% 3 70% . 1
77% 3 97% 3 70%
100% 6 93% 6 73%
81% 1 90% 1 79% . 1
80% 3 94% 3 83% . 1
84% 1 98% 1 87% . 1
73% 6 87% 6 100% . 1
93% 3 97% 3 87% . 1
100% 6 100% 6 93% . 1
93% 3 97% 3 87% . 1
67% 6 100% 6 93%
80% 3 100% 3 87% . 1
80% 3 94% 3 83% . 1
97% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 91% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
100031012
100031012
100032004
100032004
100032004
100051002
PQC
1
2
1
2
3
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
Date
Began
12/15/99
12/15/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
06/15/00
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
12/16/99
12/17/99
02/14/99
02/14/99
01/03/99
Q1 Frea
1
6
1
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
89% 1
94% 6
82% 1
74% 1
97% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
85% 1 96% 1 91% 1 1
82% 6 100% 1 61% . 1
93% 1 96% 1 88% 1 1
35% 1 28% 6 95% . 1
100% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
110010041
110010041
110010042
110010043
110010043
110010043
FLORIDA
120010023
120010024
120090007
120111002
120112004
120113002
120170005
120251016
120251016
120256001
120310098
120310099
120330004
120330004
120330004
120570030
120571075
120571075
120571075
120710005
120710005
120730012
120814012
120830003
120951004
120952002
120952002
120990009
120991004
120992003
121030018
121031008
121056006
121111002
121150013
121171002
121275002
GEORGIA
1
2
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
3
5
1
1
5
6
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
3 . .
21.
21.
T . 1
T . 1
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/00
01/06/99
09/05/99
03/01/00
01/01/99
04/01/99
04/03/99
02/05/99
02/04/99
10/01/00
01/27/99
06/01/99
06/01/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/01/99
01/21/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/07/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
05/01/00
12/04/99
05/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/27/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/07/99
01/04/99
02/21/99
03/01/99
03/20/99
01/15/99
02/06/99
01/09/99
09/12/99
03/29/00
01/01/99
04/02/99
04/03/99
02/05/99
02/04/99
01/27/99
06/30/99
06/30/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
01/20/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/30/99
01/21/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
12/04/99
01/05/99
01/01/99
01/27/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/09/99
01/06/99
1
3
6
1
6
3
3
6
1
1
3
3
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
74% 1
70% 6
81% 3
82% 1
47% 6
97% 3
100% 3
13% 3
98% 1
90% 1
100% 3
90% 3
92% 1
100% 3
93% 1
93% 1
100% 3
93% 1
92% 1
84% 3
74% 3
65% 3
97% 3
96% 1
99% 1
99% 1
91% 1
86% 1
84% 3
77% 3
97% 3
100% 3
90% 3
100% 3
80% 1 76% 1 70% . 1
94% 6 75% 6 94% . 1
60% 3 65% 3 84% . 1
90% 1 86% 1 89% 1 1
20% 6 13% 6 7%
97% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 93%
92% 1 100% 1 99% 1 1
92% 1 91% 1 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
87% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
92% 1 79% 1 98% 1 1
93% 3 68% 3 90% . 1
87% 1 65% 1 97% . 1
49% 1 74% 1 85% . 1
100% 3 94% 3 90% 1 1
92% 1 91% 1 97% 1 1
96% 1 96% 1 100% 1 1
83% 3 84% 3 100% 1 1
93% 3 84% 3 90% . 1
83% 3 97% 3 87% . 1
90% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
97% 1 95% 1 99% 1 1
90% 1 93% 1 95% 1 1
85% 1 96% 1 98% 1 1
82% 1 99% 1 93% 1 1
92% 1 91% 1 96% 1 1
87% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
87% 3 87% 3 87% 1 1
90% 3 87% 3 97% 1 1
83% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
130210007
130210007
130210012
130510017
130510017
130510091
130590001
130630091
130670003
130890002
130890002
130892001
130892001
130950007
131150005
131210032
131210032
131210039
131211001
131270004
131270006
131350002
131390003
131530001
131850003
132150001
132150001
132150011
132230003
132450005
132450005
132450091
132950002
133030001
133190001
HAWAII
150030010
150031001
150031001
150031004
150032004
150032004
150090006
IDAHO
160010011
160010011
160010011
160010017
160050006
160050015
160050015
160050015
PQC
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
2
3
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
3 . .
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
Date
Began
02/02/99
02/02/99
02/11/99
01/21/99
01/01/99
01/21/99
01/21/99
01/09/99
02/07/99
01/22/99
10/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/02/99
01/18/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/21/99
01/01/99
01/21/99
08/31/99
01/01/00
02/14/99
07/05/00
01/01/00
03/04/99
01/01/99
01/21/99
01/24/99
01/21/99
01/01/99
02/08/99
01/01/00
01/30/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/28/99
11/01/98
07/20/99
12/20/00
12/13/98
11/01/98
11/01/98
07/17/99
01/01/01
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
02/02/99
02/11/99
01/21/99
01/21/99
01/30/99
01/09/99
02/07/99
01/22/99
01/01/99
07/24/99
02/02/99
01/18/99
01/01/99
08/17/99
01/21/99
01/01/99
OS/30/99 01/21/99
08/31/99
01/01/00
02/14/99
07/05/00
01/01/00
03/04/99
03/25/00
01/21/99
01/24/99
01/21/99
03/13/00
02/08/99
01/01/00
01/30/99
04/12/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
12/02/99
10/03/99
01/01/99
10/27/99
01/30/99
06/28/01 01/03/99
07/21/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
06/28/01 01/03/99
07/18/99
01/01/01
Q1 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
6
3
3
1
3
3
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
3
3
6
3
6
6
3
3
1
6
1
3
3
3
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
94% 3
97% 3
97% 3
90% 3
94% 3
87% 3
90% 3
77% 1
85% 1
6%
100% 3
84% 3
87% 1
90% 3
94% 3
87% 3
69% 6
81% 3
88% 6
94% 3
0%
97% 3
97% 3
74% 3
0%
68% 3
94% 6
94% 6
90% 3
35% 1
97% 1
6
81% 6
85% 1
6
81% 3
100% 3
97% 3
97% 3
94% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
90% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
87% 3 74% 3 80% . 1
90% 3 77% 3 70% . 1
97% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
53% 3 77% 3 77% . 1
80% 3 78% 3 77% 1 1
97% 3 84% 3 83% 1 1
80% 1 84% 1 78% 1 1
76% 1 79% 1 82% 1 1
87% 3 66% 3 94% . 1
87% 3 71% 3 80% . 1
75% 1 83% 1 78% . 1
80% 3 77% 3 83% 1 1
63% 3 87% 3 87% . 1
87% 3 90% 3 83% 1 1
87% 6 88% 6 100% . 1
87% 3 87% 3 80% 1 1
6 87% 6 53%
87% 6 93% 6 87% 1 1
87% 3 100% 3 83% 1 1
90% 3 94% 3 87% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 90% 1 1
83% 3 71% 3 90% . 1
67%..
93% 3 84% 3 93% . 1
67% 6 69% 6 67%
87% 6 94% 6 80% 1 1
87% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
35% 3 94% 3 97% . 1
93% 1 95% 1 85% 1 1
13% . . 6 13%
93% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
90% 1 80% 1 76% 1 1
7% . . 6 27%
93% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 92% 1 1
93% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
94% 3 91% 3 87% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
160150001
160170001
160170001
160190006
160190010
160190011
160190012
160210001
160270004
160270004
160270005
160490002
160550006
160550006
160550006
160590004
160690009
160690009
160690012
160790017
160830006
160830010
160830010
160850001
ILLINOIS
170010006
170190004
170191001
170310014
170310022
170310050
170310050
170310050
170310052
170310057
170310076
170311016
170311701
170312001
170313301
170314006
170314007
170314201
170316005
170434002
170890003
170971007
170990007
171110001
171132002
171150013
171170002
PQC
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
3 . . 1
31.
3 . .
3.1
31.
31.
3 . . 1
2 . .
31.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
3 . . 1
31.
31.
3 . . 1
31.
31.
31.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
Date
Sedan
12/13/00
11/01/98
07/17/99
12/01/98
08/10/99
02/03/01
01/31/01
05/01/99
11/01/98
07/01/00
12/07/98
10/01/00
11/01/98
07/23/99
07/01/00
09/01/00
10/04/99
07/01/00
03/16/01
09/03/99
12/13/98
12/08/99
07/01/00
10/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/01/98
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/98
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
06/28/01 01/03/99
07/18/99
08/01/99
08/31/99
02/03/01
01/03/99
08/28/00
01/06/99
07/23/99
08/28/00
10/04/99
09/21/00
09/03/99
01/06/99
12/08/99
01/01/01 08/28/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/28/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/13/00
01/01/00
01/06/99
12G1/99 01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
12G1/00 01/18/99
01/01/01
01/08/99
01/01/00
01/24/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/07/00
01/08/99
12G1/99 01/06/99
Q1 Fred
3
6
3
3
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
Q1% Q2 Fred
94% 3
88% 6
100% 3
100% 3
97% 3
100% 6
94% 6
88% 6
94% 6
82% 6
94% 6
100% 6
65% 3
97% 3
90% 1
91% 1
88% 3
87% 3
94% 3
87% 3
94% 3
75% 3
88% 1
74% 3
90% 3
87% 3
97% 3
88% 3
94% 1
81% 6
100% 3
Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
90% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
93% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
6 40% 6 100%
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
6 40% 6 93%
87% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
6 13% 6 100%
100% 6 87% 3 53% . 1
93% 6 81% 6 93% 1 1
100% 6 93% 6 93% 1 1
6 33% 6 93%
88% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
100% 6 93% 6 88% 1 1
100% 6 87% 6 100% 1 1
100% 3 84% 3 93% . 1
87% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
95% 1 98% 1 17% . 1
93% 1 98% 1 96% 1 1
77% 3 100% 3 90% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 83% 1 1
87% 3 84% 3 90% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 87% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 87% 1 1
80% 3 87% 3 87% 1 1
87% 1 93% 1 89% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 93% . 1
100% 3 97% 3 87% 1 1
84% 3 79% 3 70% . 1
97% 3 97% 3 84% 1 1
93% 3 84% 3 77% 1 1
27% 3 100% 3 84% . 1
87% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
10
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
171190023
171191007
171192009
171193007
171430037
171570001
171610003
171613002
171630010
171634001
171670012
171971002
171971011
172010010
INDIANA
180030004
180030004
180030014
180030015
180190005
180350006
180372001
180390003
180431004
180431004
180650003
180670003
180830004
180890006
180890022
180890026
180890027
180891003
180891016
180891016
180892004
180892010
180910011
180910012
180950009
180950009
180970042
180970043
180970066
180970078
180970078
180970078
180970079
180970081
180970081
180970083
180970083
PQC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
5
1
1
2
1
2
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
Date
Began
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/12/00
02/12/00
01/01/99
10/15/99
01/01/00
05/12/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/26/00
06/11/99
01/01/00
01/27/99
03/04/99
02/12/00
02/18/00
01/27/99
01/01/99
03/07/99
02/11/99
01/27/99
12/17/99
02/27/00
03/19/99
03/19/99
09/18/99
01/24/99
01/24/99
03/07/99
07/01/00
12/13/00
09/18/99
01/22/99
02/11/99
01/22/99
01/24/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/01/00
01/06/99
01/18/99
01/21/99
12G1/00 01/06/99
01/01/01
01/09/99
01/01/00
01/07/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
02/13/99
01/21/99
01/01/00
02/12/00
01/18/99
10/15/99
01/07/00
05/15/99
01/18/99
01/30/99
11/17/00
06/11/99
01/16/00
01/30/99
03/05/99
05/06/00
02/18/00
02/02/99
01/01/99
03/07/99
02/11/99
01/27/99
12/17/99
03/01/00
03/19/99
03/19/99
09/18/99
01/24/99
01/24/99
03/07/99
09/18/99
01/22/99
02/11/99
01/22/99
01/24/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
6
6
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
6
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
1
6
1
6
Q1% Q2 Frea
94% 3
100% 3
97% 3
90% 3
94% 3
100% 6
94% 6
87% 3
77% 3
91% 3
84% 3
100% 6
94% 3
90% 3
100% 6
48% 3
94% 3
97% 3
84% 3
77% 3
77% 3
88% 6
94% 3
52% 3
87% 1
97% 1
3
48% 3
84% 3
96% 1
100% 6
87% 3
16% 3
90% 3
35% 3
94% 3
81% 6
97% 3
91% 3
32% 3
97% 3
87% 3
90% 1
81% 6
93% 1
94% 6
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
97% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
94% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
93% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
100% 6 75% 6 93% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
90% 3 77% 3 94% 1 1
90% 3 94% 3 87% 1 1
93% 3 91% 3 82% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 87% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 77% 1 1
77% 3 100% 3 91% 1 1
87% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
87% 3 87% 3 91% . 1
100% 3 94% 3 60% . 1
83% 3 97% 3 84% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
67% 3 100% 3 97% . 1
90% 3 81% 3 90% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 60%
3 43%
87% 3 87% 3 100% 1 1
67% 3 90% 3 83% . 1
85% 1 84% 1 80% 1 1
87% 1 91% 1 74% . 1
57% 3 94% 3 50%
63% 3 81% 3 90% . 1
77% 3 84% 3 97% 1 1
95% 1 87% 1 78% 1 1
87% 6 80% 6 40%
73% 3 77% 3 90% . 1
83% 3 16% 3 57%
100% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
83% 3 90% 3 97% . 1
83% 3 87% 3 87% 1 1
93% 6 93% 6 93% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
90% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
87% 3 94% 3 77%
100% 3 100% 3 87% 1 1
90% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
95% 1 92% 1 93% 1 1
93% 6 87% 6 87% 1 1
98% 1 97% 1 90% 1 1
93% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
11
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
181270020
181270024
181410014
181411008
181411008
181412004
181470009
181570007
181570007
181630006
181630006
181630012
181630016
181670018
181670023
181670023
IOWA
1901 MOOS
1903M018
1903M019
190450019
190450021
1906M003
191032001
1911M029
1911M036
1911M037
1911M037
1911M037
191390015
191390016
191390020
191471002
1915M059
1915M059
191532510
191532520
191532520
191532520
191550009
1916M013
1916M015
1916M015
1916M015
1916M017
1916M018
1916M019
191692530
191770005
191770005
1919M017
KANSAS
PQC
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
2 . .
21.
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
2 . .
21.
3 . . 1
2 . . 1
21.
2.1
3 . . 1
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
Date
Began
03/04/99
01/27/99
11/20/99
04/01/99
04/01/99
04/01/99
02/01/00
04/01/99
06/05/99
04/15/99
04/15/99
04/15/99
06/05/99
03/19/99
12/06/99
12/06/99
01/15/99
06/01/98
07/01/99
08/01/98
01/27/99
01/01/00
01/27/99
10/01/98
01/15/99
01/15/99
11/01/99
01/01/01
04/01/00
01/27/99
02/01/99
08/01/98
01/01/98
11/01/99
02/01/99
02/01/99
02/01/00
01/01/01
07/01/99
06/01/98
02/01/99
01/27/99
01/01/01
06/01/98
07/01/99
07/01/01
02/01/99
01/01/00
04/01/00
01/M/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
03/04/99
01/27/99
11/20/99
04/15/99
04/18/99
04/15/99
02/06/00
05/15/99
01/01/00
04/15/99
04/18/99
04/15/99
06/11/99
03/19/99
12/08/99
01/01/00
02/06/99
07/02/99
01/27/99
01/01/00
01/27/99
08/06/99
01/30/99
01/30/99
1201/00
04/03/00
03G1/00 01/27/99
03G1/00
10/01/99
11/08/99
02/05/99
02/05/99
07/02/99
06/19/01
01/27/99
07/02/99
02/05/99
01/01/00
01/30/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
3
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
94% 3
87% 3
90% 3
65% 3
81% 6
94% 3
50% 6
87% 3
94% 6
100% 3
75% 6
90% 3
77% 3
97% 3
94% 3
88% 6
100% 3
97% 3
97% 3
94% 3
100% 3
97% 3
91% 1
3
100%
84% 3
100% 3
92% 1
87% 3
99% 1
100% 3
84% 3
87% 3
94% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
83% 3 87% 3 93% 1 1
67% 3 90% 3 80% . 1
97% 3 90% 3 83% 1 1
90% 3 100% 3 90% . 1
M% 6 93% 6 93% 1 1
83% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
93% 6 87% 6 100%
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
93% 6 93% 6 80% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 93% 1 1
M% 6 93% 6 87% 1 1
100% 3 87% 3 60% . 1
100% 3 81% 3 83% 1 1
87% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
87% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
93% 6 73% 6 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
M% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
92% 1 92% 1 82% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 100%
87% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
M% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
98% 1 100% 1 95% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
100% 1 100% 1 96% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
87% 3 84% 3 93% 1 1
91% 3 100% 3 83% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
12
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
200910007
200910007
200910008
200910009
201070002
201070002
201070002
201730008
201730009
201730010
201730010
201770010
201770011
201770012
201770012
201910002
201950001
202090021
202090021
202090021
202090022
KENTUCKY
210130002
210190017
210190017
210290006
210370003
210430500
210470006
210590014
210590014
210670012
210670012
210670014
210730006
210930005
210930006
211010006
211110043
211110043
211110044
211110048
211110048
211110051
211111041
211170007
211451004
211510003
211930003
211950002
211950002
212270007
PQC
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . .
21.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
2 . .
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
Date
Began
01/21/99
01/15/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/21/99
01/24/99
12/10/98
01/27/99
01/27/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/27/99
01/27/99
06/14/99
03/24/99
11/17/99
02/08/01
04/27/99
04/30/99
04/17/00
04/30/99
07/15/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/21/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
06/15/98
01/01/99
06/15/98
01/01/99
01/01/01
06/15/98
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/99
06/15/98
05/12/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/21/99
01/15/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/21/99
01/24/99
12G1/00
01/27/99
01/27/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
01/27/99
01/27/99
03/29/01 06/20/99
12G1/00
11/17/99
04/27/99
04/30/99
12G1/00
04/30/99
08/16/99
02/02/99
04GO/99 02/05/99
01/21/99
01/27/99
02/02/99
01/30/99
02/01/99
04GO/99 01/29/99
01/21/99
04GO/99 01/21/99
01/30/99
01/30/99
10/18/99 01/27/99
02/24/00
02/02/99
03/29/01 01/02/99
12G1/99 01/06/99
01/01/99
01/06/99
01/02/99
01/01/01
01/27/99
01/30/99
01/30/99
05/12/00
02/02/99
04GO/99 02/05/99
01/30/99
Q1 Frea
3
6
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
100% 3
100% 6
97% 3
100% 3
94% 3
100% 6
84% 3
97% 3
97% 3
81% 6
94% 3
94% 3
97% 3
90% 3
100% 3
100% 6
100% 3
63% 6
97% 3
87% 3
97% 3
90% 3
100% 3
0% 3
100% 3
100% 3
84% 3
42% 3
84% 3
95% 1
89% 1
22% 3
11% 6
100% 3
100% 3
97% 3
6
84% 3
100% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
93% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
100% 6 80% 6 100% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
93% 3 84% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 87% 6 100% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
90% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 90% 1 1
100% 3 90% 3 90% 1 1
87% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 93%
87% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
77% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 74% 3 93% . 1
93% 3 68% 3 83% . 1
65% 3 97% 3 100%
87% 3 90% 3 93% 1 1
93% 3 71% 3 90% . 1
100% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
93% 3 71% 3 78% . 1
87% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
96% 1 90% 1 93% 1 1
98% 1 88% 1 89% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 100% . 1
94% 6 100% 6 93%
90% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
53% 3 68% 3 83% . 1
100% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
53% 6 93% 6 100%
93% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
93% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
13
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
212270007
LOUISIANA
220150008
220171002
220190008
220190009
220190010
220290002
220330002
220330009
220330009
220330013
220331001
220470005
220470009
220511001
220512001
220550005
220550006
220570004
220630002
220710010
220710012
220730004
220790001
220870004
221050001
221090001
221210001
MAINE
230010011
230010011
230030013
230031011
230031011
230050015
230050026
230050027
230050027
230050028
230052003
230090103
230110016
230112002
230132001
230172011
230190002
230190002
230190002
230194003
230310008
MARYLAND
PQC
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
31.
2 . . 1
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . .
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . .
31.
3 . .
21.
2 . . 1
31.
31.
21.
31.
31.
31.
31.
21.
3 . .
2 . . 1
31.
31.
Date
Sedan
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
10/01/97
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
03/07/00
12/01/98
01/01/99
12/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/12/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
04/30/99 01/30/99
01/03/99
01/12/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/15/99
01/01/99
01/06/99
01/12/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/13/00
01/06/99
01/13/00
01/01/99
01/24/99
01/21/99
01/21/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/06/99
01/24/99
02/05/99
01/01/00
03/13/00
01/24/99
01/27/99
01/24/99
01/18/99
Q1 Fred
3
3
3
6
3
1
6
6
6
1
6
3
6
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
6
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
6
6
Q1% Q2 Fred
100% 3
81% 3
94% 3
100% 6
87% 3
97% 1
100% 6
100% 6
94% 6
99% 1
88% 6
94% 3
94% 6
94% 3
82% 1
100% 3
90% 3
84% 3
94% 3
81% 3
89% 1
90% 3
97% 3
88% 3
100% 6
81% 3
75% 6
82% 3
88% 3
88% 6
100% 6
19% 6
100% 6
94% 3
94% 6
100% 6
Q2% Q3 Fred Q3%
97% 3 97%
83% 3 100%
93% 3 100%
100% 6 87%
93% 3 84%
97% 1 99%
100% 6 100%
93% 6 93%
94% 6 93%
98% 1 96%
100% 6 100%
100% 3 90%
93% 3 81%
100% 3 94%
93% 1 95%
97% 3 100%
93% 3 97%
100% 3 100%
100% 3 94%
100% 3 100%
93% 1 98%
87% 3 94%
97% 3 97%
100% 3 100%
87% 6 93%
83% 3 90%
93% 6 100%
83% 3 94%
87% 3 91%
93% 6 100%
73% 6 93%
93% 6 73%
100% 6 67%
81% 3 97%
80% 6 93%
93% 6 93%
Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
3 100% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
6 94% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
1 99% 1 1
6 100% 1 1
6 100% 1 1
6 100% 1 1
1 91% 1 1
6 100% 1 1
3 97% 1 1
3 74% . 1
3 97% 1 1
1 89% 1 1
3 94% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
3 90% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
1 99% 1 1
3 80% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 90% 1 1
6 93% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
6 80% 1 1
6 100% 1 1
6 80% 1 1
6 100% 1 1
6 93% 1 1
6 93%
6 73%
3 93% 1 1
6 100% 1 1
6 93% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
14
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
240030014
240030019
240031003
240032002
240032002
240051007
240053001
240053001
240150003
240251001
240313001
240330001
240330001
240338001
240430009
245100006
245100007
245100007
245100035
245100035
245100035
245100040
245100049
245100052
245100052
PQC
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
5
1
2
5
1
1
1
5
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
Date
Began
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/00
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
08/07/99
08/13/99
01/13/00
09/03/99
05/03/00
01/13/00
08/04/99
12/11/99
08/04/99
07/26/99
08/01/99
12/29/99
08/07/99
12/17/99
07/26/99
07/29/99
10/21/99
11/14/99
06/17/99
08/01/99
05/12/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
6
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
1
Q1%
26%
81%
12%
68%
23%
87%
42%
90%
42%
45%
94%
48%
48%
18%
68%
46%
10%
22%
Q2 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3%
77% 3 90%
33% 3 97%
70% 3 97%
73% 3 94%
63% 3 97%
73% 3 94%
58% 1 83%
M% 3 100%
67% 3 97%
77% 3 100%
90% 3 100%
67% 3 77%
87% 3 97%
87% 3 94%
77% 3 84%
83% 3 94%
24% 1 86%
42% 3 97%
62% 1 86%
43% 3 77%
27% 3 94%
Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
3 97%
3 90%
3 97% . 1
3 93%
3 57%
3 97% . 1
1 86% . 1
3 100% 1 1
3 100% . 1
3 80% 1 1
3 83% . 1
3 93%
3 73% . 1
3 97% 1 1
3 43% . 1
3 97% . 1
1 85% . 1
3 97% . 1
1 83% . 1
3 83%
3 83%
MASSACHUSETTS
250010003
250035001
250052004
250053001
250092006
250095005
250096001
2501 MOOS
2501 MOOS
2501 M01 6
2501 M01 6
250132007
250154002
250170008
250171102
250210007
250210007
2502M004
2502M004
2502M004
250250002
250250027
250250027
250250042
250250042
250250042
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
3
4
4 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
06/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
04/03/99
01/01/99
10/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
05/15/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
04/06/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
03/20/99
04/01/99
05/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
04/03/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
1208/00 01/03/99
01/03/99
05/15/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
04/06/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
03/20/99
03/28/01
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
87%
48%
81%
77%
81%
16%
85%
90%
68%
97%
97%
84%
100%
90%
19%
13%
100%
58%
19%
65%
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
97% 3 97%
97% 3 100%
90% 3 94%
93% 3 87%
100% 3 71%
53% 3 87%
38% 1 60%
100% 3 97%
100% 3 87%
97% 1 90%
93% 3 97%
13% 3 45%
73% 3 42%
93% 3 13%
50% 3 0%
100% 3 97%
97% 3 77%
57% 3 77%
90% 3 90%
63% 1 55%
47% 3 35%
71% 1 91%
3 67% . 1
3 33%
3 97% 1 1
3 47% . 1
3 83% . 1
3 80%
1 52% . 1
3 97% 1 1
3 47% . 1
1 64% . 1
3 80% 1 1
3 53%
3 40% . 1
3 0%
3 0%
3 100%
3 93%
3 80%
3 23%
1 16% . 1
3 0%
1 76% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
15
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
250250042
250250042
250250042
250250043
250270016
250270020
250270020
250272004
MICHIGAN
260050003
260050003
260070005
260170014
260210014
260210014
260330901
260330901
260330902
260490021
260490021
260550003
260650012
260650012
260650012
260770008
260770008
260770008
260810020
260810020
260810020
260990009
260990009
261150005
261210040
261210040
261250001
261250001
261390005
261390005
261450018
261450018
261450018
261470005
261470005
261610005
261610005
261610008
261610008
261610008
261630001
261630001
261630001
PQC
5
6
7
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
5
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
5
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
T . 1
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
A 1 .
21.
A 1 .
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . . 1
31.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
T . 1
Date
Sedan
02/09/00
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/01/00
01/22/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
10/31/98
10/31/98
03/23/00
08/24/00
11/07/98
11/07/98
01/31/01
01/31/01
01/31/01
12/16/98
12/16/98
12/14/99
11/07/98
11/07/98
12/01/99
11/19/98
11/19/98
08/17/00
10/23/98
10/23/98
11/04/99
12/22/98
12/22/98
12/17/99
12/18/98
12/18/98
12/25/98
12/25/98
11/07/98
11/07/98
02/23/99
02/23/99
12/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
03/28/99
03/28/99
08/04/99
08/04/99
02/24/00
05/12/99
05/12/99
12/01/00
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/01/00
01/22/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
03/25/00
08/25/00
01/03/99
01/31/01
01/31/01
01/31/01
01/03/99
12/14/99
02/06/99
01/15/99
01/03/99
01/27/99
01/02/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
12/17/99
01/08/99
02/14/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
03/04/99
02/23/99
01/03/99
01/13/01
06/26/99
08/07/99
01/07/01
05/12/99
05/12/99
Q1 Fred
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
6
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
6
Q1% Q2 Fred
100% 3
68% 3
87% 3
61% 3
87% 3
100% 1
10% 3
100% 3
94% 3
77% 3
94% 3
97% 3
81% 3
90% 3
97% 1
100% 6
94% 3
97% 3
97% 3
100% 6
77% 3
97% 3
71% 3
35% 3
68% 3
84% 3
42% 3
89% 1
81% 6
Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
90% 3 55% 3 43% . 1
97% 3 87% 3 90% . 1
100% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
80% 3 71% 3 67% . 1
70% 3 55% 3 77% . 1
95% 1 95% 1 91% 1 1
77% 3 84% 3 87%
3 42% 3 87%
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
77% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
84% 3 77% 3 30%
83% 3 84% 3 83% 1 1
80% 3 94% 6 100% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
97% 1 97% 1 96% 1 1
100% 6 87% 6 87% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 83% 1 1
97% 3 91% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
93% 3 58% 3 67% . 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
73% 3 94% 3 73% . 1
70% 3 97% 6 93% . 1
87% 3 94% 3 87% . 1
50% 3 84% 3 97% . 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% . 1
95% 1 95% 1 92% 1 1
80% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
16
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
261630015
261630015
261630016
261630016
261630019
261630019
261630025
261630033
261630033
261630033
261630036
261630036
MINNESOTA
270353202
270370470
270376018
270412110
270475401
270530960
270530960
270530961
270530963
270530963
270531007
270532006
270611105
270674110
270757608
270854301
270854301
270953051
271035109
271095008
271112012
271230021
271230866
271230866
271230868
271230868
271230871
271230872
271230873
271377001
271377550
271377550
271377551
271390505
271453052
271630301
271713201
MISSISSIPPI
280010004
PQC
1
2
1
2
1
5
1
1
2
5
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
2 . .
21.
2 . .
21.
2.1
21.
21.
2 . .
2 . .
21.
2 . .
31.
31.
21.
31.
31.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
21.
31.
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
21.
Date
Sedan
02/26/99
02/26/99
05/12/99
05/12/99
04/30/00
12/01/00
08/22/99
02/05/99
02/05/99
12/01/00
02/20/99
02/20/99
10/03/00
10/03/00
04/24/99
10/03/00
10/01/99
04/21/99
01/01/01
04/12/99
01/07/01
01/01/01
04/24/99
04/24/99
10/03/00
10/03/00
10/01/99
10/01/99
03/01/00
12/06/99
10/03/00
01/07/00
11/14/99
04/21/99
04/01/99
07/12/99
03/31/99
06/18/99
04/24/99
04/12/99
04/21/99
05/30/99
05/06/99
06/05/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
12/20/99
10/01/99
10/01/99
03/10/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
02/26/99
05/12/99
04/30/00
08/22/99
02/05/99
02/20/99
10/17/00
10/06/00
04/24/99
10/03/00
11/08/99
01/0201 04/21/99
04/12/99
01/10/01
04/24/99
04/24/99
10/27/00
11/08/00
09/28/00 11/08/99
09/28/00 11/08/99
03/01/00
12/08/99
10/09/00
01/07/00
09/28/00 11/14/99
04/21/99
04/03/99
07/17/99
03/31/99
07/17/99
04/24/99
04/12/99
04/21/99
05/30/99
05/06/99
06/05/99
01/19/00
01/07/00
12/20/99
09/28/00 11/26/99
09/28/00 11/26/99
03/10/99
Q1 Fred
3
1
3
3
3
3
6
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
6
3
6
3
6
1
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
6
6
3
Q1% Q2 Fred
97% 3
91% 1
3
94% 3
94% 3
52% 3
71% 3
94% 6
48% 1
77% 3
29% 3
84% 3
69% 6
44% 6
25% 6
84% 3
77% 3
94% 6
100% 3
88% 6
90% 3
94% 6
46% 1
90% 3
61% 3
81% 3
100% 6
61% 3
81% 3
97% 3
100% 6
100% 6
100% 3
Q2% Q3 Fred Q3%
93% 3 100%
81% 1 85%
57% 3 75%
90% 3 97%
77% 3 87%
93% 3 94%
80% 3 77%
73% 6 33%
57% 1 57%
60% 3 87%
50% 3 74%
43% 3 74%
20% 6 40%
67% 6 87%
53% 6 87%
47% 3 97%
67% 3 97%
73% 6 53%
70% 3 52%
67% 6 87%
60% 3 61%
47% 6 93%
38% 1 60%
50% 3 74%
57% 3 58%
53% 3 97%
73% 6 93%
57% 3 87%
63% 3 71%
33% 3 65%
60% 6 80%
73% 6 73%
97% 3 94%
Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
3 100% 1 1
1 98% 1 1
3 97%
3 83% 1 1
3 97% 1 1
3 100% . 1
6 40%
3 67%
3 80% . 1
6 73%
6 40%
1 50% . 1
3 90% . 1
3 77%
3 93% . 1
6 67%
6 47%
3 80% . 1
6 80%
3 55% . 1
3 87% . 1
6 80%
3 30%
3 57%
1 63% . 1
3 83% . 1
3 60% . 1
3 87% . 1
6 73% 1 1
3 80% . 1
3 63% . 1
3 80%
3 97% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
17
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE POC
280110001 1
280330002 1
280350004 1
280450001 1
280470008 1
280470008 3
280470008 5
280490010 1
280490018 1
280590006 1
280670002 1
280750003 1
280810005 1
280870001 1
281090001 1
281210001 1
281230001 1
281490004 1
MISSOURI
290210010 1
290370003 1
290390001 1
290470005 1
290470026 1
290470041 1
290770032 1
290910003 1
290950036 1
290950037 1
290952002 1
290970003 1
290990012 1
290990012 5
291370001 1
291831002 1
291860006 1
291892003 1
291895001 1
295100007 1
295100085 1
295100085 5
295100085 6
295100086 1
295100087 1
MONTANA
300131026 1
300290039 1
300290043 1
300290047 1
300310008 1
300470013 1
300470028 1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
2 . . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
2.1
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
T . 1
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
A 1 .
A 1 .
Date
Began
05/21/99
02/14/99
03/07/99
02/14/99
04/03/99
10/01/99
10/01/00
02/14/99
02/14/99
02/14/99
03/07/99
04/03/99
02/14/99
03/07/99
04/06/00
03/07/99
08/22/99
03/07/99
12/15/98
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
04/01/00
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/30/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/01/99
11/06/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
06/26/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
05/21/99
02/14/99
03/07/99
02/14/99
04/03/99
02/14/99
02/14/99
02/14/99
03/07/99
04/03/99
02/14/99
03/07/99
04/06/00
03/07/99
08/22/99
03/07/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/02/99
01/03/99
02/16/01 01/03/99
03/1200 01/03/99
04/03/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
02/05/99
01/06/99
01/08/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
03/24/00
04/01/99
01/01/99
11/06/99
01/01/00
04/01/01 01/03/99
06/24/99 01/03/99
06/26/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
Q1 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
Q1%
100%
94%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
97%
100%
94%
100%
100%
94%
100%
87%
100%
81%
97%
97%
99%
96%
100%
97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
97%
100%
97%
94%
7%
98%
89%
86%
94%
100%
97%
97%
100%
90%
Q2 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
Q2% Q3 Frea
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
97% 3
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
97% 3
90% 3
80% 3
73% 3
97% 3
83% 3
100% 3
93% 3
93% 3
90% 3
98% 1
93% 1
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
100% 3
97% 3
100% 3
100% 3
97% 3
100% 3
100% 3
91% 1
99% 1
93% 1
100% 1
97% 3
97% 3
90% 3
100% 3
97% 3
97% 3
Q3%
100%
100%
97%
94%
97%
97%
97%
100%
97%
87%
100%
100%
97%
74%
97%
94%
100%
97%
97%
100%
100%
90%
100%
100%
97%
97%
94%
97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
97%
100%
100%
89%
100%
94%
97%
65%
97%
94%
97%
Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
3 97% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
3 83% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
3 87% 1 1
3 90% 1 1
3 90% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
3 80%
3 97% . 1
3 97% 1 1
3 80% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 97% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
1 98% 1 1
1 93% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 100%
3 97% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
3 87% 1 1
3 97% 1 1
3 97% 1 1
3 93% 1 1
3 100% 1 1
1 96%
1 97% 1 1
1 97% 1 1
1 95% 1 1
3 80% 1 1
3 70% . 1
3 100% . 1
3 73% . 1
3 93% 1 1
3 97% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
18
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
300470028
300490018
300530018
300630024
300630024
300630031
300810001
300870307
300890007
300930005
301111065
NEBRASKA
310250002
310270001
310310001
310490001
310550019
310550019
310550051
310550052
310550052
310790003
311090022
311090022
311111002
311530007
311530007
311570003
311770002
NEVADA
320030022
320030298
320030560
320030560
320031019
320032002
320050008
320310016
320310016
320310016
320312002
PQC
2
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
5
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
A 1 .
31.
21.
21.
T . 1
31.
21.
A 1 .
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . .
21.
Date
Began
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
02/11/99
01/01/99
03/01/99
09/21/99
08/04/99
08/04/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/01/99
03/01/99
03/01/99
03/01/99
04/06/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/23/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/01
06/05/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
03/13/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
02/11/99
01/03/99
03/04/99
09/21/99
08/04/99
08/04/99
02/06/99
08/28/99
02/02/99
06/10/99
02/04/99
03/07/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
03/01/99
03/04/99
03/01/99
03/13/99
04/06/99
01/03/99
10/03/00
01/14/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
12/23/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
06/05/99
Q1 Frea
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
6
3
1
6
3
3
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
1
6
3
3
3
3
6
3
Q1%
13%
100%
97%
97%
100%
65%
81%
100%
84%
97%
68%
68%
65%
55%
88%
44%
74%
78%
88%
74%
97%
75%
61%
32%
25%
71%
61%
90%
93%
100%
97%
100%
97%
100%
100%
94%
Q2 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
6
3
1
6
3
3
6
3
3
6
3
3
6
1
6
3
3
3
3
6
3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
97% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
80% 3 84% 3 73% . 1
93% 3 97% 3 80% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 50% . 1
97% 3 90% 3 83% . 1
83% 3 97% 3 60% . 1
93% 3 90% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 75% 3 47% . 1
100% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
80% 3 84% 3 80% . 1
90% 3 94% 3 90% . 1
77% 3 90% 3 93% . 1
73% 3 74% 3 73% . 1
84% 1 87% 1 79% 1 1
67% 6 93% 6 73%
87% 3 77% 3 93% . 1
78% 1 62% 1 64% . 1
40% 6 47% 6 40%
97% 3 90% 3 93% . 1
97% 3 77% 3 83% 1 1
67% 6 87% 6 73%
97% 3 87% 3 100% . 1
81% 3 71% 3 80%
69% 6 53% 6 100%
83% 3 84% 3 77% . 1
81% 3 81% 3 73% . 1
93% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
3 100%
97% 1 96% 1 98% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 93% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
94% 3 97% 3 94% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
95% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
NEW HAMPSHIRE
330012003
330012003
330012004
330050007
330070014
330070014
330110019
330110019
330111007
3301 MOOS
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
21.
2 . .
2 . .
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
07/15/99
07/15/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
04GO/00 01/06/99
04GO/00
01/01/00
01/06/99
01/01/00
08/04/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
6
6
3
6
3
6
3
3
94%
100%
32%
50%
81%
75%
84%
87%
6
6
3
6
3
6
3
3
0% ....
67% 6 33% 6 40%
53% 3 77% 3 67%
40% 6 60% 6 73%
53% 3 81% ...
53% 6 40% ...
53% 3 55% 3 50% . 1
43% 3 42% 3 83% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
19
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
330135001
330150009
330190003
NEW JERSEY
340030003
340030004
340030004
340070003
340070003
340070003
340070003
340071007
3401 30011
3401 30011
3401 3001 5
340155001
340171003
340171003
340172002
340210008
340218001
340230006
340230006
340230006
340230006
340230006
340270004
340273001
340292002
340310005
340390004
340390004
340390004
340390004
340390006
340392003
340410006
NEW MEXICO
350010023
350010023
350010024
350010027
350010027
350011013
350019004
350050005
3501 3001 6
3501 3001 7
3501 30021
3501 30022
3501 30025
350131006
PQC
1
1
1
1
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
4
5
6
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
3 . . 1
T . 1
T . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
A 1 .
31.
3 . . 1
31.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
31.
31.
Date
Sedan
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
06/12/98
01/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
05/30/97
01/01/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
05/30/97
04/21/99
09/03/99
01/01/99
12/08/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
11/25/97
01/01/98
10/01/00
10/01/00
05/30/99
01/01/99
02/11/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
05/30/97
01/01/98
01/01/99
12/11/99
08/10/99
03/03/99
01/05/00
02/03/99
06/01/00
06/02/00
06/02/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
04/29/99
01/01/99
10/01/98
10/01/98
01/01/01
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
11/05/99
04/21/99
09/03/99
01/03/99
12/08/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
05/30/99
01/03/99
02/14/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
12/17/99
08/19/99
03/03/99
01/05/00
02/03/99
01/01/00
01/15/99
01/09/99
01/01/01
12G1/00 01/15/99
Q1 Fred
6
3
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
1
1
1
6
3
3
3
Q1% Q2 Fred
75% 6
71% 3
81% 6
94% 3
94% 3
100% 6
94% 3
100% 3
81% 3
74% 3
75% 6
90% 3
97% 3
97% 3
97% 3
94% 3
100% 3
71% 3
55% 3
82% 1
100% 6
90% 3
97% 3
87% 3
88% 1
84% 1
87% 1
100% 6
85% 3
100% 3
97% 3
Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
33% 6 73% 6 60%
40% 3 58% 3 43% . 1
33% 6 53% 6 80%
100% 3 100% 3 83% 1 1
93% 3 94% 3 71% . 1
87% 6 93% 6 67%
87% 3 84% 3 73% . 1
87% 3 74% 3 93% . 1
93% 3 97% 3 83% 1 1
87% 3 90% 3 83% . 1
80% 6 81% 6 73% 1 1
83% 3 87% 3 70% . 1
97% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
93% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
97% 3 84% 3 73% . 1
83% 3 97% 3 87% 1 1
90% 3 100% 3 73% . 1
70% 3 90% 3 90% . 1
87% 3 97% 3 83% . 1
82% 1 99% 1 61% . 1
100% 6 87% 6 75% 1 1
93% 3 68% 3 97% . 1
100% 3 100% 3 80% 1 1
87% 3 87% 3 80% 1 1
99% 1 89% 1 96% 1 1
90% 1 80% 1 83% 1 1
96% 1 80% 1 89% 1 1
100% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
83% 3 92% 3 90% 1 1
97% 3 89% 3 97% 1 1
94% 3 95% 3 87% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
20
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
350151005
350171002
350250007
350431003
350439001
350439001
350439003
350439003
350439004
350439004
350450006
350490020
350499002
350550005
NEW YORK
360010005
360010005
360010012
360050013
360050073
360050073
360050080
360050080
360050083
360050083
360050083
360050083
360050110
360050110
360050110
360050110
360050112
360050113
360070009
3601 30011
360271004
360290002
360290005
360290005
360291007
360310003
360310003
360310003
360470011
360470011
360470052
360470076
360470118
360470118
360470121
360470122
360551004
PQC
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
5
1
5
6
7
1
2
3
5
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
5
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
3 . . 1
31.
31.
31.
A 1 .
A . .
A 1 .
A 1 .
A 1 .
A 1 .
31.
31.
A 1 .
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
2.1
21.
T . 1
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
2.1
2 . . 1
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
2 . . 1
2 . .
21.
2 . .
Date
Began
01/27/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
09/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/17/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/04/00
01/01/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
02/09/00
09/15/99
09/15/99
09/07/99
12/04/00
02/25/00
03/17/00
02/01/00
01/01/99
07/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/20/00
12/15/99
07/01/99
11/25/99
12/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/15/99
01/01/99
12/31/99
02/15/00
10/01/00
01/01/01
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt Q1 Fred Q1% Q2 Fred Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
01/06/99 3 90% 3 100% 3 100% 3 84% . 1
01/21/99 3 91% 3 82% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
01/06/99 3 95% 3 92% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
01/01/00 6 100% 6 100% 6 100% 6 80% 1 1
01/01/00 6 81% 6 100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
01/01/00 6 94% 6 100% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
01/01/00 3 100% 3 90% 3 84% 3 93% 1 1
01/01/00 6 100% 6 13% 3 16% ...
01/15/99 3 97% 3 97% 3 94% 3 90% 1 1
01/06/99 3 100% 3 98% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
01/01/00 6 94% 6 93% 6 87% 6 100% 1 1
07/02/99 3 90% 3 100% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
07/02/99 3 65% 3 80% 3 94% 3 93% . 1
07/02/99 3 61% 3 90% 3 84% 3 93% . 1
03/18/00 . ........
07/15/99 07/01/99 ........
07/15/99 07/02/99 ........
07/02/99 3 81% 3 90% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
07/02/99 3 68% 3 97% 3 94% 3 97% . 1
09/15/99 1 77% 1 96% 1 99% 1 98% 1 1
09/15/99 3 81% 3 90% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
02/09/00 3 55% 3 97% 3 94% 3 87% . 1
07/02/99 3 77% 3 73% 3 87% 3 70% . 1
07/02/99 3 90% 3 93% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
07/02/99 3 81% 3 83% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
07/02/99 3 74% 3 83% 3 94% 3 67% . 1
12/17/99 3 94% 3 87% 3 90% 3 77% 1 1
07/02/99 1 88% 1 73% 1 97% 1 93% . 1
07/02/99 3 55% 3 83% 3 94% 3 90% . 1
07G1/99 07/02/99 ........
04/15/00 . . 3 80% 3 97% 3 97%
07/02/99 3 84% 3 90% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
01/01/01 ........
02/28/99 . ........
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
21
STATE /SITE
360552002
360556001
360556001
360556001
360556001
360590005
360590005
360590008
360590011
360590012
360590013
360610010
360610010
360610010
360610056
360610056
360610062
360610062
360610079
360610115
360610115
360610117
360610117
360610119
360610119
360632008
360632008
360632008
360652001
360670019
360670020
360671015
360671015
360679999
360710002
360810094
360810094
360810096
360810097
360810097
360810116
360810116
360810120
360810124
360810124
360810124
360850055
360850067
360850111
360850114
360893001
360930003
PQC
1
1
2
3
5
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
5
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
3
3
1
3
6
1
1
3
3
1
1
Data in AIRS?
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
T . 1
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
2 . . 1
2 . .
2 . . 1
2 . .
2 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
2 . .
2 . . 1
2 . . 1
21.
2 . . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
2 . . 1
21.
21.
Date
Samplind
Sedan
12/15/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
05/10/00
10/01/00
01/01/99
03/15/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
07/01/00
12/31/99
01/01/99
02/21/98
12/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
08/13/99
01/01/00
12/31/99
04/09/00
12/31/99
02/23/00
10/01/00
11/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/19/00
01/01/99
08/01/99
05/02/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
05/01/00
12/31/99
07/01/99
08/28/99
04/18/00
01/01/99
12/01/00
12/31/99
04/12/00
05/20/00
01/01/01
03/15/01
03/24/01
09/01/99
01/01/99
08/01/99
01/01/01
10/01/99
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt Q1 Fred Q1% Q2 Fred
01/01/00 3
08/31/99 3
08/31/99 3
07/02/99
07/02/99
07/20/00
02/21/00
07/01/99
07/02/99
07/02/99
07/02/99
08/13/99
01/13/00
07/02/99
07/02/99
07/02/99
08/01/99
05/18/00
07/02/99
07/02/99
02/09/00
07/02/99
08/28/99
04/18/00
07/02/99
12/11/99
07/02/99
10/12/99
07/02/99
77%
32%
74%
71%
3 87% 3
3 61% 3
3
3 77% 3
3 61% 3
3 52% 3
3 90% 3
3 81% 3
3
3 81% 3
77%
2000 Information
Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4%
3 77% 3 90%
3 87% 3 80%
3 87% 3 70%
73%
3 100% 3 100%
3 93% 3 94%
3 100% 3 100%
3 97% 3 100%
3 97% 3 100%
3 100%
3 97%
3 97%
3 81%
3 94%
3 97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
22
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
361010003
361010003
361030001
361030005
361030009
361191002
361192004
PQC
1
5
1
1
1
1
3
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
2.1
21.
2 . .
3 . . 1
21.
2 . . 1
Date
Began
08/01/99
12/01/00
01/01/99
12/31/99
01/01/00
02/01/00
04/10/01
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
08/02/99
07/02/99
04/01/00
02/15/00
Q1 Frea
1
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
70% 1
68% 3
48% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
78% 1 93% 1 91% . 1
90% 3 100% 3 100% . 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% . 1
NORTH CAROLINA
370010002
370210034
370210034
370250004
370330001
370350004
370350005
370370004
370510009
370510009
370510009
370570002
370610002
370630001
370650003
370670022
370670022
370670022
370670024
370710016
370710016
370810009
370810009
370811005
370870010
370990006
370990006
371070004
371110004
371190010
371190034
371190040
371190041
371190041
371190041
371190042
371210001
371210001
371230001
371290009
371290009
371330005
371350007
371390002
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
5
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
A 1 .
A 1 .
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
05/26/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/01/99
01/01/99
06/16/99
06/16/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/01/00
04/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
07/30/99
11/01/99
10/01/00
09/12/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
07/16/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/28/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
06/02/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
10/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
03/01/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
10/03/99
01/01/99
10/03/99
05G1/01 01/03/99
01/03/99
04/03/00
04/06/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
07/30/99
09/21/00
01/03/99
10/03/99
07/17/99
01/03/99
10/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
04/30/99
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
6
1
6
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
84% 3
84% 3
100% 3
74% 3
97% 3
87% 3
3
94% 3
84% 3
94% 6
87% 3
90% 3
93% 1
87% 3
96% 1
94% 3
94% 3
81% 6
85% 1
69% 6
84% 3
94% 3
3
6
97% 3
87% 3
95% 1
97% 3
99% 1
84% 3
94% 6
65% 3
94% 3
69% 6
87% 3
97% 3
74% 3
87% 3 81% 3 90% 1 1
60% 3 87% 3 100% . 1
50% 6 88% 6 87% . 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% . 1
93% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
90% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
33% 3 100% 3 97%
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
87% 6 100% 6 87% 1 1
93% 3 77% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
98% 1 95% 1 98% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
97% 1 96% 1 99% 1 1
80% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 87% 6 93% 1 1
95% 1 78% 1 98% 1 1
73% 6 87% 6 80% . 1
93% 3 71% 3 97% . 1
93% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 80%
80% 6 80% 6 53%
87% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
98% 1 93% 1 98% 1 1
93% 3 74% ...
95% 1 96% 1 95% 1 1
3 13% 3 97%
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
93% 3 87% 3 87% . 1
97% 3 94% 3 90% 1 1
75% 6 93% 6 93% . 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
80% 3 94% 3 93% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
23
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
371470005
371470005
371550004
371550005
3717M002
3718M014
3718M014
3718M014
3718M015
371910005
PQC
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
31.
21.
21.
Date
Sedan
03/01/99
03/01/99
03/10/99
11/23/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
11/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
03/01/99
10/03/99
04/20/00 03/10/99
11/23/00
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
Q1 Fred
3
6
3
3
1
6
3
3
Q1% Q2 Fred
97% 3
94% 6
84% 3
77% 3
95% 1
81% 6
77% 3
94% 3
Q2% Q3 Fred Q3% Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
97% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 80% 1 1
10% .....
3 40%
87% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
99% 1 95% 1 93% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
93% 3 77% 3 100% 1 1
87% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
NORTH DAKOTA
380070002
3801 M002
3801 M002
3801 MOOS
3801 MOOS
380150003
380150003
380150003
380171004
380171004
380171004
380171004
380350004
380570004
380570004
380570004
380890002
380910001
OHIO
390090003
390170003
390170016
390170017
3902M005
390350013
390350027
390350034
390350038
390350045
390350060
390350060
390350065
390350066
390351002
390490024
390490024
390490025
390490025
390490028
390490029
390490081
1
1
3
1
2
1
5
6
1
2
3
5
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
21.
31.
3 . . 1
31.
31.
21.
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
2 . . 1
T . .
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . .
2 . . 1
21.
07/01/00
04/01/99
08/23/00
09/03/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/01/99
01/01/00
06/08/00
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/11/00
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
10/03/00
10/03/00
07/26/00
01/29/99
01/08/99
07/11/00
01/08/99
12/14/99
01/08/99
12/13/00
01/29/99
01/08/99
01/08/99
01/01/99
08/10/00
01/01/99
08/01/00
09/01/00
09/01/00
01/01/99
07/12/00
04/06/99
09/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/05/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
10/03/00
10/03/00
07/26/00
01/29/99
01/08/99
07/11/00
01/08/99
12/14/99
01/08/99
01/29/99
01/08/99
01/08/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
08/10/00
01/03/99
6
6
6
3
3
3
3
6
6
6
6
3
1
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
94% 6
94% 6
82% 6
100% 3
100% 3
94% 3
90% 3
100% 6
100% 6
100% 6
88% 6
55% 3
79% 1
94% 3
77% 1
65% 1
100% 3
100% 3
88% 3
81% 3
94% 3
54% 1
88% 1
84% 3
6 80% 6 100%
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
94% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
100% 6 93% 6 93% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 87% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
100% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
93% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
M% 3 90% 3 97%
95% 1 85% 1 83% 1 1
3 100%
3 100%
3 74% 3 100%
97% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
97% 1 14% 1 80% . 1
3 90% 3 90%
86% 1 91% 1 91% . 1
100% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
M% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 83% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 80% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 87% 1 1
84% 1 95% 1 82% . 1
81% 1 92% 1 78% 1 1
6 7% 6 20%
90% 3 94% 3 70% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
24
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
390610014
390610014
390610040
390610041
390610041
390610042
390610043
390617001
390618001
390810016
390811001
390851001
390870010
390930016
390932003
390950024
390950025
390950026
390990005
390990005
391130014
391130031
391130031
391330002
391351001
391450013
391510017
391510020
391530017
391530017
391530023
391550007
OKLAHOMA
400159008
400179001
400190294
400190295
400219002
400219002
400270049
400310647
400310648
400310648
400390852
400470554
400470554
400710602
400719003
400719003
400819005
400970186
401010169
PQC
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
A 1 .
A 1 .
31.
21.
A 1 .
A 1 .
5 . .
5 . .
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
A 1 .
A 1 .
A 1 .
31.
31.
Date
Began
01/01/99
01/01/01
04/01/99
03/25/99
02/06/00
10/03/00
10/03/00
01/30/99
03/25/99
01/21/99
02/11/99
01/03/99
01/24/99
09/03/00
01/01/99
02/11/99
03/01/99
05/29/99
01/01/99
02/01/01
01/15/99
01/14/99
11/11/00
01/30/99
01/21/99
01/15/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
03/13/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
11/01/99
07/01/99
02/04/99
12/13/99
07/01/99
07/01/99
05/01/01
05/01/01
02/04/99
04/06/99
01/01/99
01/26/99
04/06/99
03/01/99
11/01/99
11/01/99
11/01/99
02/28/99
01/25/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/01/99
01/01/01
04/03/99
03/25/99
02/06/00
10/03/00
10/03/00
01/30/99
03/25/99
01/21/99
02/11/99
01/03/99
01/24/99
09/03/00
01/03/99
02/11/99
03/01/99
05/29/99
01/01/99
02/01/01
01/15/99
01/14/99
01/30/99
01/21/99
01/15/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
03/13/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/24/00
08/16/99
11/05/99 04/24/99
12/20/99
08/22/99
10/15/99
04/06/99
04/06/99
04/06/99
04/06/99
04/06/99
05/06/99
02/18/00
03/01/00
02/18/00
04/12/99
04/06/99
Q1 Frea
1
3
3
6
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
6
3
6
6
3
6
6
3
6
3
6
6
6
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
81% 1
94% 3
45% 3
25%
22% 1
84% 3
84% 3
57% 1
94% 3
81% 3
94% 3
1% 1
97% 3
8% 1
88% 1
90% 1
75% 1
90% 3
6% 3
74% 3
94% 3
90% 3
66% 1
16% 1
80% 1
91% 1
6
88% 6
84% 3
63% 6
38% 6
97% 3
94% 6
94% 6
84% 3
69% 6
87% 3
38% 6
6%
44% 6
94% 3
61% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
96% 1 90% 1 86% 1 1
90% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
80% 3 77% 3 33%
6 67%
3 83%
3 100%
95% 1 83% 1 92% . 1
83% 3 74% 3 97% . 1
97% 3 94% 3 87% 1 1
81% 1 85% 1 78% . 1
87% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
83% 3 68% 3 87% . 1
3 32% 3 47%
100% 3 48% 3 63% . 1
54% 1 91% 1 92%
97% 3 84% 3 93% 1 1
62% 1 82% 1 79%
96% 1 92% 1 87% 1 1
88% 1 95% 1 79% 1 1
92% 1 87% 1 95% . 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 100%
80% 3 65% 3 80% . 1
93% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
100% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
79% 1 93% 1 80% . 1
7% ....
96% 1 92% 1 84% 1 1
75% 1 93% 1 91% . 1
73% 6 100% 6 93%
80% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
100% 3 84% 3 97% 1 1
53% 6 40% 6 87%
47% 6 53% 6 13%
100% 3 84% 3 93% 1 1
100% 6 80% 6 87% 1 1
100% 6 87% 6 100% 1 1
100% 3 84% 3 93% 1 1
93% 6 80% 6 87% . 1
97% 3 81% 3 97% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 87%
93% 6 100% 6 93%
97% 3 84% 3 87% 1 1
87% 3 90% 3 57% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
25
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE POC
401090035 1
401090035 2
401090038 1
401091037 1
401159004 1
401179007 1
401190614 1
401210415 1
401250054 1
401339006 1
401430110 1
401430110 2
401430131 1
401431127 1
401431127 3
401431127 5
OREGON
410030013 1
410090004 1
410170113 1
410170120 1
410250002 1
410290133 1
410291001 1
410292129 1
410330107 1
410350004 1
410370001 1
410370003 1
410390060 1
410391007 1
410391061 1
410392013 1
410430009 1
410470040 1
410470109 1
410470110 1
410510080 1
410510080 5
410510080 6
410510244 1
410510246 1
410590121 1
410610006 1
410610117 1
410619103 1
410650007 1
410670111 1
410671003 1
PENNSYLVANIA
420010001 1
420010001 3
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
31.
31.
31.
31.
A 1 .
A 1 .
31.
21.
31.
A 1 .
21.
31.
21.
21.
5 . .
T . 1
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
Date
Began
01/01/99
04/06/99
01/20/99
01/01/99
07/01/99
11/01/99
01/29/99
04/01/99
01/23/99
11/01/99
01/01/99
04/12/99
01/01/99
01/13/01
05/01/01
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
03/01/01
10/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/15/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/09/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
11/19/99
01/01/99
10/27/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
06/17/99
01/01/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
12/17/98
08/27/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
07/01/99
07/01/99
08/06/99
01/01/99
08/20/99
01/01/99
10/13/00
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
04/01/99
04/06/99
04/06/99
04/06/99
08/16/99
04/06/00
04/06/99
04/06/99
12/09/00 04/06/99
02/18/00
04/02/99
04/12/99
04/03/99
01/13/01
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/06/99
03/02/01
01/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
09/15/99
08/31/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
09/09/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
04/01/00
01/01/99
10/27/99
01/09/99
01/01/99
07/29/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
08/27/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
09/15/99
09/15/99
12/14/99
01/01/99
09/15/99
01/01/99
Q1 Frea
1
6
1
3
6
6
3
6
6
1
6
1
3
3
1
6
1
3
1
3
1
1
6
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
3
3
1
Q1% Q2 Frea
90% 1
94% 6
86% 1
81% 3
100% 6
6
88% 6
74% 3
75% 6
44% 6
90% 1
100% 6
75% 1
94% 3
97% 3
100% 1
81% 6
95% 1
97% 3
89% 1
97% 3
100% 1
88% 1
100% 6
93% 1
100% 3
1
1
100% 3
97% 3
97% 3
96% 1
88% 1
95% 1
91% 1
95% 1
94% 6
94% 6
100% 3
97% 3
86% 1
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
91% 1 89% 1 80% 1 1
94% 6 87% 6 93% 1 1
92% 1 93% 1 84% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
73% 6 87% 6 100% 1 1
80% 6 87% 6 100%
100% 6 60% 6 100%
91% 3 79% 3 80% . 1
93% 6 87% 6 80% 1 1
87% 6 100% 6 93%
69% 1 92% 1 88% . 1
93% 6 87% 6 100% 1 1
86% 1 80% 1 93% . 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
97% 1 89% 1 98% 1 1
87% 6 53% 6 67%
100% 1 96% 1 93% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
86% 1 91% 1 96% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
95% 1 92% 1 91% 1 1
86% 1 85% 1 96% 1 1
100% 6 73% 6 93% 1 1
97% 1 92% ...
97% 3 81%
99% 1 91% ...
99% 1 99% ...
100% 3 97% 3 80% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
98% 1 95% 1 97% 1 1
91% 1 90% 1 98% 1 1
100% 1 93% 1 98% 1 1
86% 1 90% 1 90% 1 1
99% 1 71% 1 93% . 1
47% 6 73% 6 93%
93% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
97% 3 87% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 83% 1 1
88% 1 74% 1 98% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
26
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
420030008
420030008
420030008
420030021
420030064
420030064
420030064
420030067
420030093
420030095
420030097
420030116
420030131
420031008
420031 301
420031 301
420033007
420039002
420050001
420050001
420070014
420070014
420110009
420170012
420210011
420270100
420410100
420430401
420450002
420450002
420490003
420692006
420692006
420710007
420710007
420770004
420791101
420850100
420910013
420950025
420958000
420958000
420990301
421010004
421010004
421010004
421010004
421010004
421010020
421010024
421010027
421010047
PQC
1
2
5
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
5
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
5
1
1
2
5
6
7
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
31.
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
3 . .
31.
2 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
2 . .
T . 1
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
Date
Began
02/23/99
09/02/99
05/24/00
02/14/99
01/23/99
01/24/99
11/19/99
04/12/99
03/25/99
01/30/99
01/31/99
01/30/99
02/05/99
02/13/99
01/30/99
04/18/99
01/01/01
01/24/99
01/01/00
11/09/99
12/01/99
12/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/01/00
02/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/00
10/20/99
12/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/01/00
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
02/23/99
09/02/99
02/14/99
01/23/99
01/24/99
04/12/99
03/25/99
01/30/99
12G1/00 01/31/99
01/31/99
02/05/99
02/13/99
01/30/99
04/18/99
01/24/99
01/01/00
01/19/00
01/30/99
02/11/99
02/14/99
02/18/00
02/15/00
01/01/99
01/06/99
03/19/00
01/30/99
01/30/99
05/18/00
01/09/99
01/07/00
01/30/99
01/05/99
04/09/00
02/14/99
01/05/99
01/01/00
02/04/99
02/11/99
02/17/99
10/1200 04/03/00
02/20/99
Q1 Frea
1
6
3
1
6
3
6
6
6
3
6
3
3
6
6
3
6
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
6
3
1
3
6
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
3
3
^%
57%
83%
79%
97%
89%
58%
75%
56%
75%
81%
94%
78%
78%
81%
75%
77%
19%
90%
68%
55%
45%
46%
90%
87%
6%
52%
95%
87%
13%
86%
96%
71%
69%
77%
70%
87%
87%
87%
Q2 Frea
1
3
1
3
6
6
6
3
6
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
6
1
1
6
3
6
1
1
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
3
3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
24% 1 91% 1 84% . 1
75% 3 88% 3 66% . 1
78% 1 93% 1 90% 1 1
72% 3 85% 3 43% . 1
67% 6 87% 6 53%
75% 6 53% 6 47%
67% 6 53% 6 53%
75% 6 83% 3 77% 1 1
67% 6 93% 6 60%
68% 3 91% 3 76% . 1
48% 3 84% 3 68% . 1
81% 6 93% 6 80% 1 1
97% 3 52% 3 97% . 1
6 20%
90% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 79% 3 87% . 1
90% 3 100% 3 87% . 1
90% 3 31% 3 63%
98% 1 97% 1 85% . 1
62% 1 79% 1 100% . 1
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
13% 6 7% 6 13%
13% 3 35% 3 72% . 1
90% 1 96% 1 100% 1 1
20% 6 7% 6 33%
77% 3 90% 3 77% 1 1
20% 6 7% 6 27%
82% 1 97% 1 96% 1 1
93% 1 93% 1 99% 1 1
43% 6 85% 3 82%
90% 3 90% 3 100% . 1
81% 1 95% 1 87% . 1
97% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
53% 1 95% 1 93% . 1
33% 3 94% 3 83%
40% 3 100% 3 83% . 1
50% 3 100% 3 3%
23% 3 97% 3 90%
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
27
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
421010136
421250005
421250005
421250200
421255001
421290008
421330008
421330008
PUERTO RICO
720170003
720210009
720330007
720530003
720570008
720590016
720610005
720610005
720690001
720810001
720970003
721130004
721270003
PQC
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
2 . . 1
21.
2 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
Date
Began
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/10/00
02/02/99
11/29/00
04/20/99
01/15/99
01/15/99
01/15/99
10/01/00
02/12/00
01/15/99
01/24/99
01/15/99
03/21/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
02/04/99
01/15/99
01/19/00
01/18/99
01/08/99
02/11/99
01/09/99
01/19/00
02/02/99
04/21/99
01/24/99
01/24/99
01/23/99
02/12/00
01/21/99
01/24/99
01/24/99
03/21/99
Q1 Frea
1
3
6
3
1
3
3
6
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
Q1% Q2 Frea
66% 1
71% 3
13%
77% 3
97% 1
81% 3
94% 3
6% 6
84% 3
69% 1
77% 3
90% 3
86% 1
45% 3
42% 3
94% 3
74% 3
78% 1
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
56% 1 93% 1 92% . 1
100% 3 94% 3 100% . 1
67%..
100% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
95% 1 97% 1 91% 1 1
93% 3 74% 3 77% . 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
7% ....
87% 3 94% 3 80% 1 1
77% 1 83% 1 89% . 1
70% 3 74% 3 50% . 1
80% 3 61% 3 83% . 1
81% 1 70% 1 72% . 1
70% 3 87% 3 70% . 1
93% 3 78% 3 87% . 1
73% 3 74% 3 83% . 1
93% 3 84% 3 97% . 1
80% 1 73% 1 88% . 1
RHODE ISLAND
440030002
440070020
440070022
440070022
440070022
440070023
440071005
440071010
440071010
440071010
440090007
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
1
2
5
1
21.
31.
21.
31.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
31.
T . .
21.
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/01/00
12/01/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
12/01/00
01/01/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
12/11/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/06/99
3
6
1
6
3
3
1
6
3
87% 3
94% 6
85% 1
81% 6
94% 3
90% 3
85% 1
88% 6
90% 3
97% 3 100% 3 87% 1 1
100% 6 87% 6 87% 1 1
91% 1 92% 1 87% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 87% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 77% 1 1
91% 1 96% 1 83% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
SOUTH CAROLINA
450070003
4501 30007
450190046
450190048
450190048
450190049
450190049
450250001
450290002
450290002
450370001
450370001
450410002
450430009
450430009
450450009
450450009
1
1
1
1
2
1
5
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
T . 1
31.
31.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
21.
31.
31.
21.
31.
07/19/00
03/25/99
01/15/99
04/15/99
04/24/99
11/26/98
01/01/01
01/07/00
04/15/99
06/24/99
04/30/99
06/03/99
02/23/99
01/15/99
01/21/99
05/30/99
05/30/99
03/25/99
01/15/99
04/15/99
04/24/99
01/01/99
01/07/00
04/15/99
04/30/99
02/23/99
01/15/99
01/21/99
05/30/99
05/30/99
3
3
1
6
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
6
90% 3
74% 3
98% 1
88% 6
99% 1
58% 3
48%
87% 3
97% 3
90% 3
90% 3
95% 1
100% 6
100% 3 87% 3 93% 1 1
73% 3 87% 3 93% . 1
99% 1 100% 1 96% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
99% 1 99% 1 100% 1 1
97% 3 84% 3 100% . 1
97% 3 97% 3 83% 1 1
100% 3 87% 3 90% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 90% 1 1
93% 3 87% 3 67% . 1
98% 1 89% 1 89% 1 1
100% 6 73% 6 67%
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
28
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
450470003
450510002
450510002
450630005
450630008
450630009
450730001
450790007
450790018
450790019
450790019
450830008
450830009
450830010
450910006
PQC
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
31.
31.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
31.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
31.
Date
Began
12/04/98
11/01/00
11/01/00
11/19/98
12/01/98
06/25/97
12/31/98
11/01/98
08/17/99
11/26/98
11/26/98
11/16/99
04/22/97
11/13/98
12/10/98
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/03/99
12/20/00
12/17/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
08/17/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
06/20/00
06/05/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
90% 3
97% 3
94% 3
97% 3
94% 3
97% 3
90% 3
100% 1
100% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
100% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
3 13%
3 17%
100% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
87% 3 71% 3 90% . 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
93% 3 84% 3 83% 1 1
93% 1 90% 1 83% 1 1
93% 3 81% 3 87% 1 1
SOUTH DAKOTA
460110002
4601 MOOS
460710001
4609M001
460990006
460990007
4610M013
4610M014
4610M015
4610M016
4610M016
4610M017
4610M019
461031001
TENNESSEE
470090005
470090011
470370023
470370023
470370025
470370036
470450004
470650031
470650032
470654002
470654002
4709M028
470931017
470931017
470931020
470990002
471071002
4711M004
4711M004
471192007
471251009
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
3 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
31.
21.
01/01/99
12/20/99
12/31/99
11/29/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
06/01/00
12/31/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/01/01
01/01/99
01/01/00
01/01/99
10/01/98
05/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
08/22/99
05/06/99
06/05/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/98
02/03/00
10/01/98
01/01/99
12/25/98
10/01/98
04/03/99
01/01/00
01/01/00
01/01/01
04/03/99
01/03/99
06/11/00
12G1/99 01/03/99
10/01/00 01/03/99
01/03/99
04/03/99
01/01/00
04/03/99
05/05/00 01/03/99
05/06/00
01/01/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
08/25/99
05/06/99
06/05/99
01/01/99
12/08/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
02/03/00
01/03/99
08/25/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
6
3
1
3
6
6
3
6
3
1
6
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
58% 3
32% 3
50% 6
55% 3
55% 3
6
29% 3
45% 3
39% 3
39% 3
52% 3
85% 3
3
90% 1
56% 6
97% 3
74% 1
90% 3
100% 6
0% 6
91% 3
12% 6
81% 3
76% 1
88% 6
88% 1
97% 3
65% 3
81% 3
58% 3
90% 3
100% 3
97% 3 94% 3 100% . 1
90% 3 97% 3 97%
93% 6 100% 6 100%
100% 3 100% 3 100% . 1
93% 3 68% 3 90% . 1
27% 6 93% 6 93%
73% 3 87%
70% 3 90% 3 93% . 1
M% 3 58% 3 100% . 1
93% 3 87% 3 57% . 1
57% 3 100% 3 97% . 1
33% ....
57% 3 94% 3 97%
88% 1 89% 1 95% 1 1
100% 6 73% 6 100%
93% 3 97% 3 87% 1 1
84% 1 86% 1 96% . 1
77% 3 84% 3 97% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 89% 1 1
60% 6 100% 6 100%
90% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
13% ..67%.
100% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
76% 1 91% 1 74% . 1
93% 6 87% 6 100% 1 1
87% 1 78% 1 76% 1 1
93% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
90% 3 87% 3 77% . 1
93% 3 87% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 74% 3 97% . 1
93% 3 84% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 81% 3 67% . 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
29
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
471410001
471450004
471570014
471570038
471570047
471570047
471570047
471571004
471631007
471631007
471650007
471650007
TEXAS
480290034
480290034
480290052
480290053
480290053
480290059
480290060
480290060
480370004
480391003
480550062
480610006
480612002
480850005
481130020
481130035
481130050
481130050
481130057
481130069
481130069
481130069
481130069
481130087
481133003
481210034
481350003
481350003
481350004
481390015
481390017
481410002
481410010
481410010
481410037
481410037
481410038
481410043
481410044
PQC
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
5
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . .
T . .
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
T . 1
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
Date
Began
12/25/98
10/01/98
12/01/98
12/01/98
12/01/98
01/01/99
10/01/00
12/01/98
10/01/98
01/01/99
10/01/98
10/01/98
01/01/99
03/31/99
01/01/99
10/06/99
02/15/00
02/01/00
06/03/00
06/05/00
01/06/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
02/01/00
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
03/25/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
03/31/99
07/28/00
10/01/00
01/03/99
11/16/00
02/01/00
01/03/99
02/01/00
08/16/00
02/01/00
08/25/00
01/01/99
01/06/99
12/02/99
01/01/99
02/01/00
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
09/15/99
01/03/99
01/18/99
01/16/99
01/16/99
08/31/00
01/03/99
12/23/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
10/07/99 04/01/99
03/31/99
03/31/99
10/06/99
06/05/00
06/05/00
02/17/99
11/26/99
03/31/99
01/07/00
03/13/99
03/11/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
03/25/99
01/06/99
03/11/99
03/31/99
01/03/99
03/28/99
04/02/99
12/02/99
12/02/99
01/30/99
12/14/99
12/14/99 01/30/99
01/30/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
6
3
1
6
3
3
1
3
6
1
3
1
Q1%
77%
90%
84%
75%
99%
84%
72%
100%
94%
47%
52%
97%
58%
55%
77%
87%
88%
84%
29%
31%
71%
92%
94%
67%
16%
38%
52%
44%
53%
26%
98%
Q2 Frea
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
6
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
6
3
1
6
3
3
1
3
6
1
3
1
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
90% 3 87% 3 83% 1 1
97% 3 87% 3 87% 1 1
83% 3 77% 3 67% . 1
97% 1 15% 1 80% . 1
87% 1 86% 1 89% 1 1
3 13% 3 40%
87% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
83% 3 90% 3 97% . 1
100% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
65% 1 62% 1 63% . 1
80% 3 81% 3 63% . 1
26% 1 82% 1 66%
13% 6 60% 1 8%
100% 3 94% 3 97% 1 1
60% 3 45% 3 75% . 1
87% 3 81% 3 63% . 1
73% 3 87% 3 100% . 1
84% 3 94% 3 94% 1 1
85% 1 91% 1 96% 1 1
63% 3 100% 3 97% . 1
86% 1 98% 1 97% . 1
73% 6 93% 6 87%
74% 3 74% 3 97% . 1
96% 1 98% 1 96% 1 1
93% 6 100% 6 93% 1 1
71% 3 71% 3 97% . 1
57% 3 45% 3 61%
32% 1 76% 1 93% . 1
63% 3 65% 3 43% . 1
80% 6 20% 6 69%
62% 1 83% 1 97% . 1
77% 3 81% 3 67%
96% 1 99% 1 95% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
30
STATE /SITE
481410044
481410044
481410045
481410053
481410053
481410057
481670014
481670014
481670053
481671005
481671005
481830001
482010024
482010024
482010024
482010026
482010026
482010026
482010051
482010055
482010058
482010062
482010803
482011034
482011035
482011035
482011037
482011039
482011039
482011039
482011039
482011039
482150042
482150043
482150043
482450020
482450021
482450021
482450022
482450022
482450022
482570005
483030001
483030001
483091002
483150050
483390089
483390089
483390089
483550020
483550025
483550032
PQC
2
5
1
3
5
1
3
5
1
1
2
1
1
2
5
1
3
5
1
5
1
1
5
3
1
2
1
1
3
5
6
7
1
1
3
3
1
2
1
3
5
3
1
3
1
1
1
3
5
1
3
1
Data in AIRS?
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
T . 1
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
T 1 1
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
3 . .
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
2000 Information
Date
Sedan
02/17/99
10/01/00
01/06/99
02/01/00
10/01/00
01/13/00
03/03/00
08/14/00
01/06/99
01/03/99
10/15/99
01/13/00
01/01/99
08/16/99
08/14/00
01/01/99
02/05/00
08/14/00
01/06/99
08/14/00
01/06/99
01/06/99
08/14/00
02/05/00
01/01/99
04/06/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
03/01/00
36565
02/09/00
10/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
04/26/01
01/11/01
03/06/00
03/13/00
02/24/00
02/24/00
08/14/00
10/04/00
01/03/99
03/16/01
01/04/00
01/03/99
11/05/99
02/16/00
08/14/00
01/03/99
02/01/00
01/06/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt Q1 Fred Q1% Q2 Fred Q2% Q3 Fred Q3%
02/17/99 6 50% 6 93% 6 100%
02/05/99 3 90% 3 100% 3 100%
12/14/00 ......
01/16/00 3 84% 3 97% 3 97%
08/15/00 . . . 1 37%
06/05/99 3 71% 3 67% 3 84%
10/15/99 3 68% 3 67% 3 90%
10/15/99 . . . 6 27%
01/13/00 3 84% 3 97% 3 94%
05/15/00 . . 1 31% 1 29%
08/16/99 6 38% 6 47% 6 20%
08/15/00 .... 1 45%
10/26/99 1 74% 1 70% 1 39%
08/15/00 . . . 1 49%
08/16/99 3 84% 3 73% 3 81%
08/15/00 .... 1 48%
08/16/99 3 55% 3 63% 3 71%
04/06/99 3 84% 3 70% 3 84%
08/15/00 .... 1 48%
04/01/99 1 77% 1 63% 1 92%
04/06/99 6 56% 6 47% 6 73%
08/28/99 3 82% 3 77% 3 91%
36750 07/05/99 3 68% 3 93% 3 42%
36753 .... 1 48%
01/07/00 3 77% 3 83% 3 90%
01/13/00 3 42% 3 70% 3 94%
36596 1 22% 1 15% 1 72%
03/13/00 6 13% 6 40% 6 80%
03/13/00 3 16% 3 33% 3 16%
08/15/00 . . . 1 26%
01/09/99 3 90% 3 80% 3 100%
01/13/00 6 47% 6 68% 3 70%
02/14/99 3 97% 3 100% 3 97%
11/26/99 3 45% 3 60% 3 42%
08/15/00 .... 1 48%
01/07/00 3 39% 3 63% 3 97%
01/07/00 6 50% 3 53% 3 69%
Q4 Fred Q4% complete + samples
6 100%
3 100% 1 1
6 20%
3 100% 1 1
3 88%
3 94% . 1
3 97% . 1
6 73%
3 97% 1 1
3 87%
3 90%
3 81% . 1
3 87%
3 77% . 1
3 82% . 1
3 80%
1 91% . 1
6 80%
3 79% 1 1
3 80% 1 1
3 100% . 1
1 86% . 1
6 53%
3 94%
3 97% 1 1
3 76%
3 97% 1 1
3 77%
3 87% . 1
3 90%
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
31
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
483550032
483550034
483611001
483750005
483750005
484390063
484391002
484391002
484391003
484391006
484393006
484393006
484393008
484393009
484530020
484530020
484530021
484790016
484790017
UTAH
490030003
490050004
490110001
490350003
490350012
490353003
490353006
490353006
490353006
490353007
490450002
490490002
490494001
490495008
490495010
490570001
490570007
490571003
VERMONT
500030005
500070007
500070012
500070012
500070012
500210002
500230005
500230005
PQC
2
5
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
2
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
T 1 .
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . .
21.
21.
3 . . 1
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
T . 1
21.
31.
31.
Date
Began
01/19/00
01/31/01
03/13/00
01/03/99
03/02/01
01/03/99
01/01/99
12/08/99
01/01/99
04/11/01
01/01/99
01/06/99
03/14/01
09/01/00
01/01/99
03/13/99
09/29/99
01/06/99
02/04/00
08/19/00
02/18/00
01/01/99
01/01/98
01/01/99
09/09/00
01/01/98
02/09/00
02/09/00
01/21/99
01/01/99
01/01/98
01/01/98
03/22/00
01/01/99
01/01/98
01/01/99
11/05/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
07/29/99
01/07/00
12/13/00
01/03/99
01/12/99
01/12/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/19/00
01/31/01
03/13/00
05/12/00
01/30/99
03/11/99
12/08/99
08/14/99
02/03/99
01/06/99
03/12/99
03/13/99
10/30/99
08/10/99
08/19/00
02/18/00
01/04/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
09/09/00
01/01/99
01/24/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
03/22/00
01/03/99
36572 01/03/99
01/03/99
11/05/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
07/29/99
01/07/00
01/03/99
01/12/99
36525 01/12/99
Q1 Frea
6
3
3
1
6
1
1
6
1
6
1
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
19% 6
23% 3
3
68% 3
91% 1
88% 6
92% 1
95% 1
94% 6
97% 1
69% 6
87% 1
81% 3
45% 3
97% 3
87% 3
94% 3
97% 1
94% 3
97% 3
87% 3
91% 1
13% 3
94% 3
48%
81% 3
100% 3
81% 3
90% 3
84% 3
94% 3
91% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
56% 6 93% 6 87%
30% 3 26% 3 77%
20% 3 84% 3 83%
97% 3 97% 3 97% . 1
98% 1 95% 1 85% 1 1
80% 6 80% 6 100% 1 1
73% 1 82% 1 93% . 1
84% 1 92% 1 100% 1 1
100% 6 100% 6 100% 1 1
87% 1 96% 1 91% 1 1
80% 6 100% 6 93% . 1
93% 1 96% 1 99% 1 1
83% 3 90% 3 93% 1 1
3 48% 3 93%
97% 3 87% 3 83% . 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 93% 1 1
90% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
3 23% 3 73%
89% 1 78% 1 96% 1 1
87% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
87% 3 84% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 90% 3 93% 1 1
100% 1 90% 1 99% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 90%
100% 3 84% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
3 57%
100% 3 94% 3 90% 1 1
87% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 68% 3 73% . 1
100% 3 84% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 87% 3 93% 1 1
VIRGIN ISLANDS
780010012
780050008
780050009
VIRGINIA
1
1
1
21.
2 . .
21.
01/12/99
01/01/00
04/06/00
01/12/99
36706
04/06/00
6
88% 6
6
67% 6 67% 6 67%
53% 6 73% 6 7%
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
32
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
510130020
510360002
510410003
510590030
510591004
510591004
510595001
510870014
510870014
510870015
511071005
511390004
515200006
515500012
516500004
516500004
516800014
517000013
517100024
517600020
517600020
517700014
517750010
518100008
WASHINGTON
530010003
530050002
530050002
530090009
530110013
530110013
530310003
530330004
530330017
530330017
530330021
530330024
530330024
530330027
530330032
530330033
530330033
530330037
530330057
530330057
530330080
530330080
530330080
530332004
530332004
530410006
530530029
PQC
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
5
1
3
1
1
3
1
5
6
1
3
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
2 . .
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
3 . .
31.
21.
3 . . 1
31.
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
T . 1
31.
3 . . 1
21.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
T . 1
T . 1
21.
3 . . 1
31.
21.
Date
Began
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
11/02/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/17/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
04/12/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/01/00
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
10/21/00
12/16/98
01/01/00
10/03/99
11/19/98
08/14/00
01/13/00
12/07/98
12/28/98
03/07/00
12/23/98
03/10/99
01/01/00
08/04/99
04/30/00
02/09/00
02/07/00
11/02/00
10/17/98
01/01/00
11/01/98
02/09/00
02/09/00
10/28/98
01/01/00
01/07/00
10/03/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/29/99
01/30/99
02/02/99
01/29/99
01/30/99
01/30/99
01/28/99
01/28/99
02/05/99
11/23/99
01/30/99
01/31/99
01/30/99
01/28/99
02/08/99
01/30/99
01/27/99
02/02/99
01/30/99
02/02/99
10/21/00
02/28/99
36979 10/03/99
01/09/99
36977 01/13/00
36436 01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
03/10/99
08/04/99
36929 02/09/00
36929
11/02/00
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/07/00
10/03/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
6
3
6
3
1
3
3
3
1
1
3
6
1
Q1% Q2 Frea
100% 3
74% 3
87% 3
82% 1
58% 3
90% 3
84% 3
71% 3
97% 3
78% 3
84% 3
74% 1
94% 3
13% 3
94% 3
90% 3
66% 1
94% 3
90% 3
94% 3
74% 3
100% 6
97% 3
82% 6
87% 3
90% 1
94% 3
90% 3
63% 3
100% 1
98% 1
29%
69% 6
96% 1
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
97% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
77% 3 94% 3 97% . 1
97% 3 81% 3 97% 1 1
85% 1 93% 1 87% 1 1
87% 3 81% 3 73% . 1
93% 3 71% 3 87% . 1
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 90% 3 87% . 1
93% 3 100% 3 87% 1 1
83% 3 90% 3 88% 1 1
93% 3 84% 3 97% 1 1
63% 1 89% 1 85% . 1
100% 3 77% 3 70% . 1
47% 3 100% 3 93%
97% 3 97% 3 83% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
98% 1 97% 1 97% . 1
87% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
100% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
6 73%
87% 3 74% 3 97% . 1
94% 6 93% 6 88% 1 1
90% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
88% 6 93% 6 94% 1 1
90% 3 97% 3 80% 1 1
100% 1 96% 1 98% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 83% 1 1
93% 3 91% 3 97% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 94% . 1
3 53%
100% 1 88% 1 100% 1 1
91% 1 88% 1 95% 1 1
88% 6 83% 6 81% . 1
99% 1 93% 1 93% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
33
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE
530530029
530530031
530530031
530531018
530570014
530610005
530610005
530611007
530611007
530630001
530630016
530630016
530630047
530630047
530639000
530650004
530670013
530670013
530710005
530730015
530750003
530750004
530770009
530770012
PQC
3
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
3
1
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
21.
31.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
31.
21.
3 . . 1
21.
3 . . 1
31.
3 . .
21.
3 . . 1
3 . .
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
Date
Began
11/02/00
10/28/98
08/25/00
10/28/98
12/03/99
10/03/99
07/03/00
10/28/98
01/01/00
10/03/00
12/19/98
01/01/00
12/04/98
01/01/01
11/07/98
04/01/01
10/31/98
08/29/00
01/13/01
02/05/99
01/19/00
01/07/00
05/06/00
01/09/99
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/14/99
10/03/99
01/03/99
36863 10/03/00
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
02/05/99
01/19/00
36922 01/07/00
05/06/00
36403 01/09/99
Q1 Frea
1
3
6
3
3
1
3
6
3
3
6
6
Q1% Q2 Frea
100% 1
97% 3
88% 6
100% 3
97% 3
98% 1
97% 3
94% 6
100% 3
90% 3
75% 6
94% 6
3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
100% 1 98% 1 98% 1 1
87% 3 94% 3 83% 1 1
100% 6 87% 6 93% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 90% 1 1
100% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
6 67%
88% 1 97% 1 90% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
100% 6 100% 3 50% . 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
87% 3 87% 3 94% 1 1
94% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
93% 6 93% 6 93% 1 1
63% 3 100% 3 100%
WEST VIRGINIA
540030003
540090005
540110006
540290011
540290011
540291004
540330003
540390009
540390010
540391005
540391005
540490006
540511002
540550002
540610003
540690008
540810002
540890001
541071002
WISCONSIN
550090005
550090025
550090026
550090028
550250025
550250047
550270007
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
21.
31.
21.
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
31.
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
02/14/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
05/12/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
02/12/01
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
02/14/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
36655 01/03/99
05/12/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/21/99
36799 01/03/99
01/03/99
03/02/01
01/03/99
01/16/99
01/06/99
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
97% 3
97% 3
94% 3
100% 3
94% 3
94% 3
97% 3
90% 3
3
100% 3
97% 3
71% 3
90% 3
97% 3
97% 3
94% 3
97% 3
97% 3
90% 3
78% 3
94% 3
91% 3
94% 3
100% 3
90% 3
100% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
93% 3 90% 3 87% 1 1
100% 3 87% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
80% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 87% 3 93% 1 1
43% .....
37% 3 97% 3 87%
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 80% 1 1
97% 3 81% 3 97% . 1
87% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
100% 3 94% 3 77% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 90% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 90% 1 1
90% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 93% 1 1
80% 3 94% ...
97% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 97% 1 1
94% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
93% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
-------
PM2.5 (88101) Data Completeness (as of 7/11/01)
34
Data in AIRS?
2000 Information
STATE /SITE POC
550290004 1
550310025 1
550430009 1
550550008 1
550590019 3
550710007 1
550790010 2
550790026 1
550790026 5
550790043 1
550790050 1
550790051 1
550790059 2
550790099 1
550870009 1
550890008 1
551050002 1
551091002 1
551250001 1
551330027 2
551330034 1
551390011 1
551410016 1
WYOMING
560131004 1
560210001 1
560330001 1
560330002 1
Non-
FRM Non-FRM
ML FRM Daily Hourly
21.
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
T . 1
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
31.
31.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
Date
Began
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/06/99
01/01/99
12/25/98
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
12/13/00
01/12/99
03/13/99
02/05/99
12/25/98
02/05/99
01/01/99
03/19/99
01/03/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/01/99
01/21/99
01/01/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
10/15/98
10/01/98
10/01/98
Date Date of 1st
Ended Pt
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/05/99
01/01/99
01/21/99
03/13/99
02/05/99
01/03/99
02/05/99
01/03/99
03/25/99
01/03/99
01/09/99
01/06/99
01/03/99
01/21/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/01/00
01/03/99
01/03/99
01/03/99
Q1 Frea
3
3
6
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
6
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Q1% Q2 Frea
100% 3
87% 3
75% 6
94% 3
100% 3
97% 3
96% 1
90% 1
90% 3
94% 3
87% 3
90% 3
100% 3
94% 3
81% 3
97% 3
75% 6
94% 6
96% 1
100% 3
94% 3
97% 3
94% 3
90% 3
100% 3
100% 3
Q2% Q3 Frea Q3% Q4 Frea Q4% complete + samples
93% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
87% 6 75% 6 83% 1 1
94% 3 97% 3 97% 1 1
87% 3 94% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 100% 3 93% 1 1
95% 1 100% 1 92% 1 1
98% 1 97% 1 85% 1 1
91% 3 75% 3 91% 1 1
97% 3 97% 3 83% 1 1
90% 3 84% 3 93% 1 1
91% 3 90% 3 80% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 90% 3 100% 1 1
88% 3 97% 3 90% 1 1
91% 3 91% 3 94% 1 1
47% 6 80% 6 100%
100% 6 93% 6 100% 1 1
98% 1 98% 1 95% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
93% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
97% 3 94% 3 79% 1 1
90% 3 100% 3 100% 1 1
90% 3 94% 3 93% 1 1
100% 3 97% 3 100% 1 1
100% 3 100% 3 97% 1 1
-------
Attachment 3
PM2.5 Data Flags
1) Flag Definitions
2) Data Qualifiers by State
3) Null Data Flags by State
-------
The following attachments list the four types of data qualifiers used in the PM2 5 Program. Definitions of
the data qualifiers are provided below.
Null value codes- Code that replaces the actual routine value
Code
9967
9968
9969
9970
9971
9972
9973
9974
9975
9976
9977
9978
9979
9980
9981
Explanation
Sample Pressure Out of Limits
Technician Unavailable
Construction/Repairs in Area
Shelter Storm Damage
Shelter Temperature Outside Limits
Scheduled But Not Collected
Sample Time Out of Limits
Sample Flow Rate Out of Limits
Insufficient Data (Can't Calculate)
Filter Damage
Filter Leak
Voided by Operator
Miscellaneous Void
Machine Malfunction
Bad Weather
Code
9982
9983
9984
9985
9986
9987
9988
9989
9991
9992
9993
9994
9995
9997
9998
Explanation
Vandalism
Collection Error
Lab Error
Poor Quality Assurance Results
Calibration
Monitoring Waived
Power Failure (POWR)
Wildlife Damage
Quality Control (QC) Control Points (zero/span)
QC Audit
Maintenance/Routine Repairs
Unable to Reach Site
Multi-point Calibration
Building/Site Repair
Precision/Zero/Span
Exceptional Events
A
E
J
I
High Winds
Forest Fire
Construction/Demolition
Unusual Traffic Congestion
L
P
Q
U
Highway Construction
Roofing Operation
Prescribed Burning
Sahara Dust
Sampler Generated flags
T
W
Multiple PM2.5 Validity Flags (W or X flag)
Flow rate average out of spec.
X
Y
Filter Temperature difference out of spec
Elapsed sample time out of Spec.
Data Qualifiers
1
2
3
Deviation from a CFR method requirement-
Operational Deviations- Out of some pre-defined
threshold value.
Field Issue- possible field contamination
4
5
6
Lab Issue- possible lab contamination
Outlier -outside the normal/expected range of
concentrations or fails various statistical or
comparison tests
QAPP - Data collection prior to QAPP approval
-------
Summary of AIRS PM2.5 Data Flags by State
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
Data
25
9
2
30
92
25
17
9
5
29
30
7
17
35
50
18
17
22
21
15
21
27
31
32
17
21
16
17
10
11
21
18
49
47
12
47
29
27
50
10
9
24
11
31
74
16
6
2
20
30
19
28
4
1262
Values
2401
929
153
2403
10192
2458
1698
1408
778
5919
3096
914
1326
4152
5596
2669
1743
2645
3044
1164
2324
2750
3941
2028
1942
3773
1639
1784
1184
529
2227
2401
5805
5737
903
7164
2909
5366
6290
1529
1251
3190
897
3951
8676
1880
665
64
2771
3988
2037
3725
472
150480
Flagged
1974
808
153
2402
9027
2458
1395
1297
772
5919
2729
789
1292
4152
5032
2623
1641
1650
3044
1164
2324
2551
3941
1770
1242
3579
1576
1684
1061
2
2227
2387
5739
5647
886
6754
2848
5366
5834
1230
1251
3114
223
1694
8350
1871
665
58
2732
3980
1983
3722
444
139056
Flags
427
121
0
1
1165
0
303
111
6
0
367
125
34
0
564
46
102
995
0
0
0
199
0
258
700
194
63
100
123
527
0
14
66
90
17
410
61
0
456
299
0
76
674
2257
326
9
0
6
39
8
54
3
28
11424
% of Flaqqe
% of Total '
Values
17.8%
13.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.4%
0.0%
17.8%
7.9%
0.8%
0.0%
11.9%
13.7%
2.6%
0.0%
10.1%
1.7%
5.9%
37.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.2%
0.0%
12.7%
36.0%
5.1%
3.8%
5.6%
10.4%
99.6%
0.0%
0.6%
1.1%
1.6%
1.9%
5.7%
2.1%
0.0%
7.2%
19.6%
0.0%
2.4%
75.1%
57.1%
3.8%
0.5%
0.0%
9.4%
1.4%
0.2%
2.7%
0.1%
5.9%
7.6%
d Values
'alues
a
7
7
0.1%
0.5%
e
4
15
19
53
33
13
39
176
1.5%
0.1%
f
1
1
0.0%
0.0%
i
3
1
6
10
0.1%
0.0%
I
4
292
296
2.6%
0.2%
n
2
2
0.0%
0.0%
d
1
1
0.0%
0.0%
t
21
26
2
16
14
19
1
19
2
10
15
42
8
23
50
112
301
12
1?
705
6.2%
0.5%
u
1
6
7
0.1%
0.0%
w
6
1
6
1
1
1
2
1
19
0.2%
0.0%
X
43
6
1082
44
60
3
108
22
11
95
51
196
249
9
9
107
13
11
31
17
341
5
67
9
85
150
235
8
38
3
27
3135
27.4%
2.1%
V
1
6
22
16
1
1
7
1
8
1
3
2
1
1
6
25
48
66
2
9
3
1
231
2.0%
0.2%
1
169
60
7
125
36
31
433
14
890
700
115
98
497
20
248
459
1759
5661
49.6%
3.8%
2
214
35
58
1
350
2
3
82
7
3
55
35
18
44
47
954
8.4%
0.6%
3
7
18
13
1
1
5
8
4
57
0.5%
0.0%
4
3
4
3
1
54
2
67
0.6%
0.0%
5
1
11
1
1
7
2
2
2
7
1
30
65
0.6%
0.0%
6
30
30
0.3%
0.0%
Page 1
-------
Summary of AIRS PM2.5 Null Value Reason Codes By State
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEWYORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
Total #
Mon. with
Data
25
9
2
30
92
25
17
9
5
29
30
7
17
35
50
18
17
22
21
15
21
27
31
32
17
21
16
17
10
11
21
18
49
47
12
47
29
27
50
10
9
24
11
31
74
16
6
2
20
30
19
28
4
1262
Total # of
AIRS Data
Rcrds.
2694
92£
15;
240;
11761
265E
211C
159£
792
606C
369£
100C
135£
4152
642E
282C
1832
298£
3044
129£
2324
390£
3941
246£
204C
3862
183E
2084
122£
752
2227
251;
660£
625;
941
872E
290£
536E
657;
152£
139;
3434
116;
464E
891;
2011
71£
10;
2771
399E
21 9E
3801
487
16350£
# of Null
Data Pts.
293
0
0
0
1569
198
412
191
14
141
603
86
33
0
830
151
89
344
0
135
0
1159
0
440
98
89
197
300
44
223
0
112
804
518
38
1562
0
0
285
0
144
244
266
695
237
131
53
41
0
10
159
76
15
13029
% of Flaggei
% of Total V
Null % of
Rcrds.
10.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.3%
7.5%
19.5V,
11.9%
1.8%
2.3%
16.3%
8.6%
2.4%
Q.Q°A
12.9V,
5.4%
4.9V,
11.5%
0.0V,
10.4%
0.0V,
29.6V,
0.0V,
17.8%
4.8%
2.3V,
10.7%
14.4%
3.6%
29.7V,
0.0V,
4.5%
12.2%
8.3%
4.0V,
17.9V,
0.0V,
0.0%
4.3V,
0.0V,
10.3V,
7.1V,
22.9V,
15.0%
2.7%
6.5V,
7.4V,
39.0V,
0.0%
0.3%
7.2%
2.0V,
3.1V,
6.0V,
Values
jlues
9964
^
2
0.0V,
0.0%
996;
1'
1'
0.1%
0.0%
9968
5
7
1
9
8
30
0.2%
0.0%
9969
2
1
;
0.0%
0.0%
9970
41
41
0.3%
0.0%
9971
1
1
0.0%
0.0%
9972
48
248
86
10
45
3
8
120
4
4
4
20
38
1
1
2
4
7
15
5
40
3
39
2
757
5.8%
0.5%
9973
16
123
35
21
41
1
2
51
9
31
9
29
53
2
3
34
1
4
7
44
49
9
14
7
49
1
11
7
156
1
4
35
6
7
872
6.7%
0.5%
9974
7'
t
;
;
10;
i
;
;
2'
4;
1
;
:
27E
2.1%
0.2%
9975
4
1
4
4
1C
£
1
1
1£
4£
1£
3
11
2
1
131
1.0%
0.1%
9976
:
1£
:
16£
;
3:
1
1
11
11
;
1
;
2'
;
31
;
2'
187
1£
1
11
'
;
c
c
i
;
:
1C
eo;
4.6%
0.4%
9977
27
12
2
41
0.3%
0.0%
9978
£
1C
14
1
17
1
;
2
11
22
1C
1
12
1
23
2
1C
61
£
22
c
11
2;
4
28£
2.2%
0.2%
9979
1;
51
;
£
1;
141
10'
;
1
;
1C
s;
1£
18£
1£
;
2;
4;
2£
6C
;
10'
5£
1
/
27
27
i
13£
1C
3£
1
11
;
125C
9.6%
0.8%
9980
116
413
72
72
115
4
151
74
13
249
100
35
68
62
737
3
50
29
21
75
8
78
1
100
197
11
1153
41
57
97
113
363
38
29
16
10
57
2
4830
37.1%
3.0%
9981
272
5
2
12
1
1
11
12
1
3
320
2.5%
0.2%
9982
1
;
£
7
1£
0.1%
0.0%
9983
1£
17;
4
;
4C
1
is;
2;
£
24
17
12£
27
2
1£
5£
i
1
4£
132
41
1
3;
4£
57
1
1£
17
1£
1
1£
1;
117E
9.0%
0.7%
9984
£
1;
11
1
;
1'
;
3/
1
e:
15£
2C
21
1C
14:
5'
14;
3:
13;
3'
:
1£
92'
7.1%
0.6%
9985
1
363
2
14
1
1
6
70
1
3
14
476
3.7%
0.3%
9986
4
^
3
4
1
1C
£
3C
3.2%
0.0%
9987
1
1
;
0.0%
0.0%
9988
3£
£
7
;
c
1C
14
1
104
£
2
1C
£
27
1
1
3
1
4
31
6C
4£
£
7
2£
67
;
1C
£
1;
;
54;
4.2%
0.3%
9989
1
2
3
0.0%
0.0%
9990
1
1
2
0.0%
0.0%
9992
1C
1
1
1
1;
0.1%
0.0%
9993
27
1£
c
11
1
;
;
1
1
4
;
£
1£
;
;
1;
1
1
12£
1.0%
0.1%
9994
'
;
7
'
3'
1
1
1C
;
1:
;
8C
0.6%
0.0%
9995
1
2
2
5
7
3
20
0.2%
0.0%
9996
1
1
0.0%
0.0%
9997
1
17
;
2;
c
;
;
;
;
8C
15C
1.2%
0.1%
9998
1
1
0.0%
0.0%
Page 2
-------
Attachment 4
PM2.5 Precision
This section covers the following attachments related to precision
4-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
4-2 Collocated Precision Data Completeness
4-3 Collocated Precision Estimates
1) Quarterly National Precision Estimates by Method Designation
2) Number of Pairs in National Precision Estimate by Method Designation
3) Collocated Precision Estimates Aggregated by Region/State/Reporting
Organizations/Method Designation
-------
Attachment 4-1
Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
-------
Completeness - Precision
Data Capture by Region, 2000 Qtr1-Qtr4
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
60
50
2 30
.0
I
i 20
10
60
50
Quarter 1
51
41
19
16
13p~~i
10
77%
11
10
53%
24
.2115
53%
t
H
00%
43
44
36
B4%
24
21
19
20127%
11
46%
15
13
14
9
39%
25
1915 14
50% 14 15100%
10
Quarter 2
_a
E
30
20
10
12
92%
12
60%
13
52%
12
80%
10
Goal (25% of FRM SLAMS Sites) W/ Precision Data 73% or more Precision
-------
Completeness - Precision
Data Capture by Region, 2000 Qtr1-Qtr4
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
60
50
o> 40
Quarter 3
54
41
30
20
10
60
50
(/) ,,«
-------
Attachment 4-2
Collocated Precision Data Completeness National and by State/Site
Field Definitions
STATE:
SITE:
POC:
# of Accuracy Records. O1-O4:
U.S. and State total rows show the total number of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in 2000 [the
number of sites where the primary FRM sampler has a Monitor Type='2'], the number of FRM SLAMS
sites that operated in all 4 quarters of 2000, the number of SLAMS sites where flow rate checks were
required [the number of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in all 4 quarters], the number of sites
reporting accuracy transactions, and the number of sites with 4 quarters of accuracy data. After each
State name, all FRM SLAMS sites located in that State are listed.
Site Identification Code = State FIPS code (2 char.) + County FIPS code (3 char.) + AIRS Site ID (4
char.)
Parameter Occurrence Code. POC is left blank for Sites that didn't report flow rate information in
year 2000.
The number of flow
rate audits reported in
each calender quarter
of 2000
Number of Q w/ Accuracy: The number of quarters where 'accuracy' information are reported
Accuracy in All 4 Q's: ' 1' = Flow rate audits reported in each quarter of 2000
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Precision (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
SITE
POC
1st Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
2nd Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
3rd Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
4th Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
Number of
Qw/Pdata
AII4Q's
Complete
U.S.
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
# SLAMS operated in 2000=972; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=906; # where Prec. required (25%)=227; #w/ Prec. Data =260; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data =116
n SLAMS operated in 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=16; # where Prec. required (25%)= 4; #w/ Prec. Data = 6; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 1
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GEORGIA
010730023
010732003
010735002
010890014
010970002
011010007
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
12
5
16
0
0
60%
80%
33%
100%
0%
0%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 6;
020200018
020900010
021100004
1
2
2
11
11
19
73%
73%
1 00%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 5; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 5;
040191028
1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=24;
050010001
050010010
050310001
050450002
051190007
051191008
051310008
1
1 .
1
1 .
1
1
1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=83;
060170011
060190008
060250005
060271003
060290014
060370002
060371103
060571001
060652002
060658001
060670006
060710014
060712002
060730006
060798001
061010003
061110007
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=13;
080010001
080410011
080770003
1
1
1
n SLAMS operated in 2000=10;
090010010
090090018
090091123
090092123
1
1
1
1
3
20%
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 4;
16
10
8
10
13
100%
67%
53%
67%
87%
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=80;
16
11
11
0
12
0
14
15
0
10
13
7
13
11
16
15
10
1 00%
73%
73%
0%
80%
0%
93%
1 00%
0%
67%
87%
47%
87%
73%
100%
1 00%
67%
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 3;
16
13
16
1 00%
87%
100%
n SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 9;
22
24
24
22
100%
100%
100%
1 00%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 7;
100031012
100032004
1
1
15
17
1 00%
1 00%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 3; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 3;
110010041
110010043
1
1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=29;
120010023
120111002
120170005
120310099
120330004
120570030
120710005
120952002
120992003
121030018
121056006
121111002
121150013
121171002
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=23;
130210007
130510017
130892001
131210032
132150001
132450005
1
1
1
1
1
1
18
8
100%
53%
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=29;
15
14
0
12
14
14
11
16
13
13
11
10
16
14
100%
93%
0%
80%
93%
93%
73%
100%
87%
87%
73%
67%
1 00%
93%
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=23;
13
14
11
10
12
4
87%
93%
73%
67%
80%
27%
11
13
3
13
9
9
#where Prec.
15
14
17
#where Prec.
11
73%
87%
20%
87%
60%
60%
required (25%)= 2;
100%
93%
100%
required (25% )=1;
73%
13
10
5
14
13
15
#w/ Prec
15
14
14
#w/ Prec
9
87%
67%
33%
93%
87%
100%
. Data = 3;
100%
93%
93%
. Data = 1;
60%
# where Prec. required (25%)= 4; #w/ Prec. Data = 7;
13
10
10
15
10
14
#where Prec
13
13
14
8
10
0
14
12
9
7
14
11
12
10
15
15
13
87%
67%
67%
100%
67%
93%
10
3
14
14
14
13
14
67%
20%
93%
93%
93%
87%
93%
12
14
4
15
14
14
80%
93%
27%
100%
93%
93%
4 .
4 .
4 .
4
3 .
3 .
# w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 3
15
15
15
100%
100%
100%
4
4
4
# w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 0
0
#w/4 Comp.
0
8
12
14
12
14
12
. required (25%)=20; #w/ Prec. Data =17; #w/4Comp
87%
87%
93%
53%
67%
0%
93%
80%
60%
47%
93%
73%
80%
67%
100%
100%
87%
15
17
11
15
14
0
14
14
14
15
7
0
11
10
12
13
6
100%
100%
73%
100%
93%
0%
93%
93%
93%
100%
47%
0%
73%
67%
80%
87%
40%
# where Prec. required (25%)= 3; #w/ Prec. Data = 3;
13
11
15
87%
73%
100%
# where Prec. required (25%)= 2;
13
9
12
12
#where Prec.
16
33
#where Prec.
10
3
#where Prec
13
14
0
6
13
13
18
14
0
13
11
13
10
14
87%
60%
80%
80%
required (25%)= 2;
100%
100%
required (25% )=1;
67%
20%
16
16
14
100%
100%
93%
#w/ Prec. Data = 4;
13
13
15
15
#w/ Prec
15
13
#w/ Prec
9
2
87%
87%
100%
100%
. Data = 2;
100%
87%
. Data = 2;
60%
13%
15
10
11
12
12
1
15
12
14
10
0
0
15
13
11
16
12
#w/4 Comp.
14
15
15
0%
Q Prec. Data = 1
0%
53%
80%
93%
80%
93%
80%
. Q Prec. Data = 7
100%
67%
73%
80%
80%
7%
100%
80%
93%
67%
0%
0%
100%
87%
73%
100%
80%
Q Prec. Data = 3
93%
100%
100%
3 .
3 .
2 .
4.
3 .
4.
4 .
4
4
4 .
4
3 .
4.
1 .
4
4
3 .
4 .
3 .
2 .
4
4.
4
4
4.
4
4
4
#w/ 4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
13
13
12
11
87%
87%
80%
73%
4
4.
4
4
# w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 2
30
15
100%
100%
4
4
# w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 0
11
1
.required (25%)= 7; #w/ Prec. Data =14; #w/4Comp.
87%
93%
0%
40%
87%
87%
100%
93%
0%
87%
73%
87%
67%
93%
15
15
0
0
0
14
20
15
11
14
10
11
12
15
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
93%
100%
100%
73%
93%
67%
73%
80%
100%
# where Prec. required (25%)= 6; #w/ Prec. Data = 6;
10
8
13
9
10
8
67%
53%
87%
60%
67%
53%
8
6
4
7
13
7
53%
40%
27%
47%
87%
47%
0
14
24
12
0
14
28
14
15
13
13
11
15
15
#w/4Comp.
8
9
11
9
9
9
73%
7%
Q Prec. Data = 6
0%
93%
100%
80%
0%
93%
100%
93%
100%
87%
87%
73%
100%
100%
Q Prec. Data = 0
53%
60%
73%
60%
60%
60%
4.
4.
3 .
4
1 .
3 .
2 .
4
4
4
3 .
4
4 .
4.
4 .
4
4.
4 .
4.
4.
4 .
4 .
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Precision (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
SITE
POC
1st Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
2nd Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
3rd Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
4th Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
Number of
Qw/Pdata
AII4Q's
Complete
HAWAII
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
LOUISIANA
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 5; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 5; #where Prec. required (25%)= 1 ; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
150031001 1 13 87% 10 67% 15 100% 12 80%
150032004 1 14 93% 11 73% 13 87% 10 67%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 7; #where Prec. required (25%)= 2; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 1
160270004 2. ... 6 40% 15 100%
160550006 2 13 87% 14 93% 14 93% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=35; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=35; # where Prec. required (25%)= 9; #w/ Prec. Data = 9; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 1
170310050 1 11 73% 13 87% 13 87% 2 13%
170310052 1 11 73% 12 80% 13 87% 11 73%
170313301 1 11 73% 9 60% 12 80% 12 80%
170314201 1 11 73% 9 60% 11 73% 11 73%
171150013 1 13 87% 13 87% 9 60% 12 80%
171191007 1 11 73% 14 93% 9 60% 12 80%
171193007 1 14 93% 14 93% 12 80% 10 67%
171430037 1 13 87% 1 7% 6 40% 11 73%
171610003 1 10 67% 11 73% 14 93% 7 47%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=40; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=39; #where Prec. required (25%)=10; #w/ Prec. Data =10; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 6
180030004 1 14 93% 12 80% 15 100% 13 87%
180431004 1 10 67% 11 73% 10 67% 14 93%
180891016 1 16 100% 13 87% 12 80% 10 67%
180950009 1 13 87% 12 80% 14 93% 13 87%
180970081 1 12 80% 14 93% 13 87% 10 67%
180970083 1 14 93% 13 87% 12 80% 16 100%
181411008 1 7 47% 13 87% 13 87% 14 93%
181570007 1 14 93% 13 87% 14 93% 11 73%
181630006 1 13 87% 14 93% 12 80% 12 80%
181670023 1 13 87% 14 93% 15 100% 15 100%
n SLAMS operated in 2000=18; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=16; # where Prec. required (25%)= 4; #w/ Prec. Data = 5; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 5
190450021 1 25 100% 30 100% 27 100% 30 100%
191130037 1 15 100% 16 100% 22 100% 16 100%
191532520 1 21 100% 21 100% 20 100% 20 100%
191550009 1 22 100% 29 100% 26 100% 23 100%
191630015 2 22 100% 21 100% 23 100% 19 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=12; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=12; # where Prec. required (25%)= 3; #w/ Prec. Data = 4; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
200910007 1 16 100% 14 93% 12 80% 15 100%
201070002 1 15 100% 12 80% 10 67% 15 100%
201730010 1 13 87% 14 93% 15 100% 14 93%
202090021 1 16 100% 15 100% 15 100% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=19; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=19; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 6; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
210190017 1 12 80% 8 53% 14 93% 14 93%
210590014 1 0 0% 10 67% 14 93% 14 93%
210670012 1 14 93% 12 80% 13 87% 14 93%
211110043 1 11 73% 14 93% 12 80% 11 73%
211950002 1 9 60% 12 80% 15 100% 12 80%
212270007 1 15 100% 13 87% 12 80% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=21 ;# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=21 ; # where Prec. required (25% )= 5; # w/ Prec. Data = 4; # w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 4
220171002 1 16 100% 14 93% 11 73% 15 100%
220330009 1 16 100% 15 100% 13 87% 15 100%
220550005 1 15 100% 11 73% 14 93% 15 100%
220710012 1 14 93% 15 100% 12 80% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 5; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 5; #where Prec. required (25%)= 1 ; #w/ Prec. Data = 3; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 1
230030013 1 14 93% 13 87% 14 93% 0 0%
230050027 1 14 93% 14 93% 14 93% 11 73%
230190002 1 15 100% 9 60% 9 60% 12 80%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=18; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=18; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 3; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
240032002 1 0 0% 18 100% 28 100% 22 100%
240330001 1 2 13% 18 100% 24 100% 23 100%
245100035 1 7 47% 11 73% 36 100% 30 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=21 ;# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=20; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 5; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 2
250130016 1 22 100% 30 100% 26 100% 14 93%
250210007 1 28 100% 15 100% 0 0% 0 0%
250230004 1 4 27% 29 100% 28 100% 28 100%
250250027 1 6 40% 14 93% 11 73% 0 0%
250270020 1 17 100% 24 100% 22 100% 19 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=24; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=22; # where Prec. required (25%)= 6; #w/ Prec. Data = 6; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 5
260650012 1 29 100% 22 100% 25 100% 15 100%
260770008 1 24 100% 27 100% 30 100% 28 100%
260810020 1 15 100% 14 93% 12 80% 13 87%
261210040 1 16 100% 14 93% 13 87% 14 93%
261450018 1 7 47% 18 100% 28 100% 11 73%
261630001 1 12 80% 11 73% 14 93% 14 93%
n SLAMS operated in 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=16; # where Prec. required (25%)= 4; #w/ Prec. Data = 4; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
270530960 1 1 7% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
271230866 1 15 100% 8 53% 6 40% 10 67%
271230868 1 15 100% 6 40% 9 60% 0 0%
271377550 1 14 93% 10 67% 14 93% 11 73%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=15; # where Prec. required (25%)= 4; #w/ Prec. Data = 4; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
4.
4 .
2 .
4
4.
4
4.
4 .
4 .
4 .
4 .
4 .
4.
4
4.
4.
4
4 .
4
4 .
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.
4
4
4.
3 .
4
4
4.
4
4
4
4
4
3 .
4
4.
3 .
4.
4.
4
2 .
4 .
3 .
4
4
4
4
4
4 .
4
1 .
4.
3 .
4 .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Precision (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Numt
SITE POC n Precision* | Percent # Precision*] Percent # Precision*] Percent # Precision* | Percent Qw/
280330002 1 12 80% 13 87% 15 100% 5 33%
280350004 1 14 93% 15 100% 14 93% 4 27%
280670002 1 0 0% 7 47% 15 100% 4 27%
281210001 1 9 60% 8 53% 11 73% 5 33%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=19; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=17; # where Prec. required (25%)= 4; #w/ Prec. Data = 7; #w/4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 7
290210010 1 30 100% 28 100% 30 100% 29 100%
290470026 1 15 100% 15 100% 14 93% 14 93%
290770032 1 14 93% 14 93% 15 100% 15 100%
290952002 1 16 100% 15 100% 15 100% 15 100%
291831002 1 26 100% 27 100% 31 100% 29 100%
291892003 1 15 100% 12 80% 15 100% 13 87%
295100085 1 88 100% 84 100% 91 100% 74 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 7; #where Prec. required (25%)= 2; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
300530018 1 12 80% 0 0% 11 73% 7 47%
300630024 1 12 80% 0 0% 14 93% 2 13%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=13; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=13; # where Prec. required (25%)= 3; #w/ Prec. Data = 4; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
310550019 1 11 73% 9 60% 13 87% 9 60%
310550052 1 11 73% 5 33% 7 47% 2 13%
311090022 1 11 73% 9 60% 11 73% 11 73%
311530007 1 6 40% 10 67% 7 47% 13 87%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 8; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 8; #where Prec. required (25%)= 2; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 2
320030560 1 16 100% 15 100% 15 100% 15 100%
320310016 1 18 100% 18 100% 19 100% 18 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 9; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 8; #where Prec. required (25%)= 2; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
330070014 1 1 7% 5 33% 8 53% 4 27%
330110019 1 10 67% 7 47% 5 33% 0 0%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=19; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=19; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 3; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
340070003 1 14 93% 11 73% 13 87% 7 47%
340171003 1 9 60% 11 73% 13 87% 11 73%
340390004 1 13 87% 15 100% 13 87% 10 67%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 3; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 2; #where Prec. required (25%)= 1 ; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 1
350010023 1 74 100% 66 100% 72 100% 65 100%
350010024 1 0 0% 1 7% 0 0% 2 13%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=50; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=43; # where Prec. required (25% )=1 1 ; # w/ Prec. Data = 8; # w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = £
360010005 1 18 100% 23 100% 28 100% 26 100%
360050110 1 21 100% 21 100% 30 100% 27 100%
360556001 1 18 100% 23 100% 24 100% 21 100%
360610056 1 27 100% 28 100% 28 100% 27 100%
360610062 1 23 100% 27 100% 30 100% 30 100%
360632008 1 12 80% 20 100% 30 100% 26 100%
360671015 1 14 93% 21 100% 24 100% 26 100%
360810094 1 23 100% 24 100% 27 100% 29 100%
erof AII4Q's
3 data Complete
4.
4.
3 .
4 .
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
3 .
3 .
4.
4.
4.
4.
4 1
4 1
4 .
3 .
4.
4.
4.
4 1
2 .
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=31 ; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=28; # where Prec. required (25% )= 7; # w/ Prec. Data =11; # w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 6
370210034 1 10 67% 4 27% 14 93% 12 80%
370510009 1 14 93% 13 87% 15 100% 13 87%
370670024 1 14 93% 10 67% 12 80% 10 67%
370710016 1 13 87% 15 100% 13 87% 14 93%
370810009 1 10 67% 10 67% 11 73% 12 80%
371190040 1 13 87% 12 80% 12 80% 0 0%
371190042 1 . . . . 2 13% 14 93%
371210001 1 12 80% 14 93% 15 100% 15 100%
371290009 1 11 73% 11 73% 13 87% 13 87%
371470005 1 14 93% 14 93% 14 93% 11 73%
371830014 1 12 80% 14 93% 15 100% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; #SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 6; #where Prec. required (25%)= 2; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 2
380171004 1 28 100% 29 100% 31 100% 27 100%
380570004 1 14 93% 15 100% 14 93% 15 100%
4.
4 1
4.
4 1
4.
3 .
2 .
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
n SLAMS operated in 2000=45; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=37; # where Prec. required (25%)= 9; #w/ Prec. Data =15; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 5
390170003 1 16 100% 15 100% 15 100% 15 100%
390350038 1 0 0% 0 0% 11 73% 12 80%
390350060 1 14 93% 11 73% 14 93% 11 73%
390490025 1 10 67% 12 80% 14 93% 11 73%
390610014 1 16 100% 14 93% 15 100% 15 100%
390610041 1 16 100% 15 100% 15 100% 0 0%
390811001 1 5 33% 11 73% 8 53% 9 60%
390851001 1 0 0% 0 0% 7 47% 14 93%
390932003 1 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 20%
390950024 1 0 0% 0 0% 10 67% 5 33%
390990005 1 12 80% 14 93% 15 100% 11 73%
391130014 1 0 0% 15 100% 13 87% 12 80%
391450013 1 0 0% 0 0% 4 27% 10 67%
391510017 1 14 93% 14 93% 14 93% 15 100%
391530017 1 9 60% 10 67% 14 93% 11 73%
#SLAMS operated in 2000=4; #SLAMS operated all 4 Q=4; #where Prec. required (25%)= 1; #w/ Prec. Data = 1; # w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 0
401430110 1 14 93% 8 53% 13 87% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=25; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=25; # where Prec. required (25%)= 6; #w/ Prec. Data = 7; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
410290133 1 12 80% 12 80% 14 93% 11 73%
4 1
2 .
4 1
4 .
4 1
3 .
4.
2 .
1 .
2 .
4 1
3 .
2 .
4 1
4 .
4.
4 1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Precision (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
PENNSYLVANIA
PUERTO RICO
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Numt
SITE POC n Precision* | Percent # Precision*] Percent # Precision*] Percent # Precision* | Percent Qw/
410330107 1 12 80% 10 67% 14 93% 12 80%
410370001 1 12 80% 14 93% 12 80% 14 93%
410390060 1 27 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
410510080 1 15 100% 15 100% 14 93% 15 100%
410650007 1 14 93% 10 67% 13 87% 14 93%
410671003 1 14 93% 11 73% 14 93% 10 67%
erof AII4Q's
3 data Complete
4.
4 1
1 .
4 1
4 .
4.
# SLAMS operated in 2000=37; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=36; # where Prec. required (25%)= 9; #w/ Prec. Data =10; #w/4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 2
420030008 1 8 53% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
420030064 1 13 87% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
420031301 1 12 80% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
420070014 1 12 80% 13 87% 6 40% 8 53%
420450002 1 15 100% 11 73% 10 67% 12 80%
420692006 1 15 100% 12 80% 14 93% 12 80%
420710007 1 14 93% 9 60% 12 80% 11 73%
421010004 1 10 67% 4 27% 11 73% 11 73%
421250005 1 10 67% 14 93% 14 93% 10 67%
421330008 1 14 93% 12 80% 15 100% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=10; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=10; # where Prec. required (25%)= 3; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
720610005 1 0 0% 6 40% 11 73% 10 67%
721270003 1 0 0% 12 80% 11 73% 12 80%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 6; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 6; #where Prec. required (25%)= 2; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
440070022 1 8 53% 12 80% 14 93% 9 60%
440071010 1 10 67% 14 93% 14 93% 12 80%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=14; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=13; # where Prec. required (25%)= 3; #w/ Prec. Data = 4; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 2
450190048 1 13 87% 14 93% 15 100% 14 93%
450450009 1 14 93% 14 93% 10 67% 9 60%
450510002 1 ...... 4 27%
450790019 1 28 100% 26 100% 25 100% 24 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=1 1 ;# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 0; # where Prec. required (25% )= 3; # w/ Prec. Data = 3; # w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data = 0
460130003 1 3 20% 7 47% 14 93% 14 93%
460990006 1 9 60% 9 60% 14 93% 12 80%
461031001 1 5 33% 5 33% 14 93% 13 87%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=21 ;# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=19; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 7; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 5
470370023 1 9 60% 13 87% 9 60% 15 100%
470654002 1 29 100% 24 100% 30 100% 28 100%
470931017 1 12 80% 11 73% 10 67% 10 67%
471130004 1 15 100% 27 100% 24 100% 26 100%
471570047 1 15 100% 15 100% 23 100% 16 100%
471631007 1 19 100% 23 100% 27 100% 28 100%
471650007 1 30 100% 29 100% 24 100% 27 100%
1 .
1 .
1 .
4 .
4 .
4 1
4 .
4 .
4.
4 1
3 .
3 .
4 .
4 .
4 1
4.
1 .
4 1
4.
4 .
4 .
4.
4 1
4.
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=57; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=51; #where Prec. required (25%)=13; #w/ Prec. Data =13; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
480290060 1 . . 2 13% 8 53% 5 33%
481130050 1 5 33% 11 73% 14 93% 12 80%
481130069 1 14 93% 12 80% 15 100% 14 93%
481410010 1 6 40% 7 47% 2 13% 6 40%
481410044 1 8 53% 14 93% 14 93% 15 100%
481671005 1 0 0% 0 0% 4 27% 10 67%
482010024 1 . . 1 7% 2 13% 0 0%
482011035 1 7 47% 5 33% 11 73% 10 67%
482450021 1 2 13% 3 20% 11 73% 7 47%
483550032 1 1 7% 5 33% 7 47% 11 73%
484391002 1 13 87% 12 80% 12 80% 14 93%
484393006 1 14 93% 13 87% 14 93% 15 100%
484530020 1 10 67% 10 67% 15 100% 12 80%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=12; # where Prec. required (25%)= 3; #w/ Prec. Data = 4; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 1
490110001 1 0 0% 10 67% 14 93% 14 93%
490353007 1 2 13% 9 60% 12 80% 15 100%
490494001 1 14 93% 14 93% 11 73% 15 100%
490570007 1 4 27% 12 80% 12 80% 14 93%
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 3; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 3; #where Prec. required (25%)= 1 ; #w/ Prec. Data = 0; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 3; #SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 1 ; #where Prec. required (25%)= 1 ; #w/ Prec. Data = 0; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 0
# SLAMS operated in 2000=20; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=20; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 3; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
510130020 1 29 100% 29 100% 30 100% 28 100%
517100024 1 25 100% 30 100% 28 100% 26 100%
517600020 1 41 100% 28 100% 31 100% 25 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=20; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=18; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 5; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
530330057 1 16 100% 15 100% 14 93% 15 100%
530530031 1 15 100% 14 93% 15 100% 13 87%
530630016 1 16 100% 12 80% 18 100% 15 100%
530730015 1 10 67% 12 80% 13 87% 8 53%
530770009 1 . . 8 53% 15 100% 16 100%
# SLAMS operated in 2000=12; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=10; # where Prec. required (25%)= 3; #w/ Prec. Data = 2; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 2
540290011 1 29 100% 22 100% 30 100% 27 100%
540391005 1 27 100% 29 100% 28 100% 24 100%
n SLAMS operated in 2000=21 ;# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=21; # where Prec. required (25%)= 5; #w/ Prec. Data = 6; #w/4 Comp. Q Prec. Data = 3
550090005 1 20 100% 29 100% 29 100% 11 73%
550250025 1 12 80% 26 100% 25 100% 21 100%
3 .
4 .
4 1
4.
4.
2 .
2 .
4 .
4 .
4 .
4 1
4 1
4.
3 .
4.
4 1
4 .
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 .
3 .
4 1
4 1
4 1
4 1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Precision (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE SITE
550310025
550790026
550790059
551330027
1st Quarter
POC n Precision* | Percent
1 27 100%
1 15 100%
2 15 100%
2 16 100%
2nd Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
26 100%
15 100%
14 93%
15 100%
3rd Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
31 100%
15 100%
1 3 87%
1 3 87%
4th Quarter
n Precision* | Percent
10 67%
9 60%
10 67%
13 87%
Number of
Qw/Pdata
4
4
4
4
AII4Q'S
Complete
1
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 4; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 4; #where Prec. required (25%)= 1; #w/ Prec. Data =
560330002 1 16 100% 15 100% 15 100%
1; # w/ 4 Com p. Q Prec. Data =
15 100%
-------
Attachment 4-3
1) Quarterly National Precision Estimates by Method Designation
2) Number of Pairs in National Precision Estimate by Method Designation
3) Collocated Precision Estimates Aggregated by Region/State/Reporting
Organizations/Method Designation
-------
Field Definitions for Collocated Precision Estimates Aggregated by
Region/State/Reporting Organizations/Method Designation
This attachment provides precision estimates for each reporting organization and for each site that comprises the
reporting organization. Estimates are provided at quarterly levels for individual sites and at quarterly and annual
levels for reporting organizations. The attachment is sorted by EPA Region, State, Reporting Organization, Method
Designation, Quarter, and Site. Only pairs for which both values were greater than 6 • g/m3 are included in the
estimates.
The columns of the table are:
AIRS ID: 9-digit AIRS ID for the sites or "A" to indicate a reporting organization-wide summary.
Quarter: Indicates the quarter for CYOO. "A" means annual.
Est. Rel. RMSE: This is the estimate of precision, in %. Following the estimate are two numbers within parentheses.
These numbers are the lower and upper 90% confidence limits for the precision estimate. If an asterisk follows the
interval, it indicates that the upper bound of the confidence limit exceeds 10%, the DQO for precision. Some
conficence intervals can be very wide because they are based on few observations.
No. of Observations: The number of pairs greater than 6 • g/m3 used to estimate precision. Sites/Reporting
Organizations with precision confidence intervals exceeding 10% and for which there are several observations (say 7
or more) should be investigated for potential causes of the large imprecision.
No. of Sampler Quarters: The number of site/quarters in precision estimate.
Est. Rel. Bias: Collocated samplers can give an estimate of bias relative to each other. For example, it is possible to
determine if one of the collocated samplers is consistently reading higher than the other. The estimated relative bias
column is such an estimate. The numbers within the parentheses provide a 90% confidence limit for the relative bias
estimate. The interval should straddle 0%. If it does not, then one of the samplers is consistently reading higher
than the other.
An Example: The first line in the attachment is for the Connecticut Reporting Organization 001 running R&P
sequential samplers. Site 090010010 had 22 paired collocated values greater than 6 • g/m3 in the first quarter of CYOO.
These 22 pairs produced a precision estimate of 24.0% CV. The associated 90% confidence interval is 19.4 to 32.1,
which is both wide and entirely greater than 10%, the DQO for precision. The 22 pairs also produced a relative bias
estimate of 9.8% and a 90% confidence interval that does not include 0%. This indicates that the collocated sampler
is reading consistently higher than the primary sampler, by about 10%. This consitent relative bias is contributing to
the large precision estimate.
-------
Precision Results for CY 2000 Data
Quarterly National Precision Estimates for CY 2000
(based on AIRS Extraction 071101)
Method
116
117
118
118 and 120
119
120
All Methods
Quarter
/ Annua 1
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
Includes
All
7
7
6
7
7
14
14
12
9
13
10
8
8
8
8
11
9
9
10
10
17
16
15
22
17
12
13
13
15
14
11
10
10
10
10
Pairs
.7823
.7199
.3747
.8335
.3848
.9137
.4367
.3688
.7811
.0085
.6178
.0645
.1901
.2741
.8455
.1279
.6821
.8382
.4541
.2819
.2536
.1858
.0197
.3169
.4462
.8033
.6883
.9901
.6115
.0813
.5135
.3120
.1763
.7297
.6828
Excludes Pairs
< 6
7
7
6
7
7
6
5
5
3
5
7
6
5
5
6
7
6
6
5
6
11
6
11
18
12
8
8
6
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
ug/m3
.6082
.7199
.4209
.6514
.3138
. 1430
.6073
. 1405
.9468
.2160
.0534
.3995
.8546
.4432
.2171
.3274
.9083
.0272
.9014
.5582
. 1824
.0555
.2796
.6876
.0525
.2281
.2716
.5540
.1674
.5621
.3362
.8573
.1988
.2344
.6648
Excludes Pairs
w/ % Diff
Excludes Pairs
< 6 ug/m3 OR
>50% w/ % Diff > 50%
7
7
6
7
7
6
7
6
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
10
9
9
10
9
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
.7823
.7199
.3747
.8335
.3848
.7833
.5770
.8332
.6038
.7306
.7513
.8241
.1573
.1229
.4682
.9809
.2475
.3860
.4121
.7613
.5375
.4317
.2131
.3704
.7316
.7479
.4804
.0973
.2802
.6642
.1622
.4695
.6552
.5867
.9729
7
7
6
7
7
5
5
5
3
4
5
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
5
8
6
7
10
7
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
5
.6082
.7199
.4209
.6514
.3138
.2425
.6073
. 1405
.9468
.9198
. 1671
.8229
.4355
.4174
.7188
.4325
.2316
.6027
.7708
.0125
. 1920
.0555
. 1743
.8470
.9186
.2880
.3207
.1064
.7532
.8680
.5145
.3053
.7552
.9261
.1258
-------
Method
116
117
118
118 and 120
119
120
All Methods
Number of Pairs in National Precision Estimates for CY 2000
(based on AIRS Extraction 071101)
Quarter
/ Annua 1
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
1
2
3
4
Ann
Includes
All Pairs
58
35
61
47
201
265
269
281
273
1088
2577
2534
2737
2542
10390
3290
3311
3559
3314
13474
55
102
115
71
343
713
111
822
772
3084
3668
3717
4016
3705
15106
Excludes Pairs
< 6 ug/m3
52
35
55
46
188
190
101
161
198
650
2186
1959
2230
2107
8482
2801
2600
2920
2769
11090
45
67
89
48
249
615
641
690
662
2608
3088
2803
3225
3061
12177
Excludes Pairs
w/ % Diff
>50%
58
35
61
47
201
260
263
275
270
1068
2537
2513
2713
2515
10278
3237
3272
3514
3270
13293
51
96
111
63
321
700
759
801
755
3015
3606
3666
3961
3650
14883
Excludes Pairs
< 6 ug/m3 OR
w/ % Diff > 50%
52
35
55
46
188
189
101
161
198
649
2167
1947
2221
2098
8433
2775
2583
2907
2757
11022
44
67
87
46
244
608
636
686
659
2589
3060
2786
3210
3047
12103
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
090010010
090013005
090019003
090090018
090091123
090092123
090010010
090013005
090019003
090090018
090091123
090092123
090010010
090090018
090091123
090092123
090010010
090090018
090091123
090092123
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
24.0 (
0.4 (
0.4 (
3.2 (
9.7 (
6.0 (
14.1 (
0.8 (
1.7 (
5.5 (
3.3 (
3.2 (
3.8 (
4.5 (
4.2 (
5.6 (
5.5 (
3.2 (
13.2 (
4.0 (
13.1 (
7.9 (
4.6 (
7.3 (
9.8 (
. REL.
CONF
19.
0.
0.
2.
7.
4.
10.
0.
0.
4.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
2.
9.
2.
11.
6.
4.
6.
9.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
4,
2,
2,
6,
9,
8,
7,
5,
9,
0,
5,
4,
9,
5,
2,
3,
0,
5,
6,
9,
7,
8,
0,
2,
1,
32
6
6
4
12
8
21
3
27
9
5
5
5
6
6
8
8
4
21
6
15
9
5
9
10
REGION-1 STATE-MA
AIRS ID
250130016
250210007
250230004
250250027
250270020
250130016
250210007
250230004
250250027
250270020
250130016
250230004
250250027
250270020
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
EST
(90%
4.3 (
4.0 (
19.8 (
5.7 (
6.8 (
5.9 (
9.9 (
8.4 (
8.7 (
6.9 (
4.8 (
7.6 (
9.0 (
9.2 (
. REL.
CONF
3.
3.
12.
3.
5.
4.
7.
6.
6.
5.
3.
5.
6.
7.
.1)*
•7)
.8)
•2)
.9)*
.1)
.4)*
•7)
.3)*
.1)
•1)
.0)
.8)
•7)
•1)
.0)
.7)
.8)
.8)*
.8)
.0)*
.6)
.5)
.0)
.6)*
REPORTING
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
5,
2,
9,
9,
2,
8,
4,
6,
6,
6,
8,
9,
5,
3,
5
5
47
10
9
7
15
11
13
9
6
10
14
12
.9)
.3)
.0)*
.9)*
.9)
.7)
.4)*
.6)*
.2)*
•2)
.4)
.9)*
.8)*
.7)*
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
22
1
1
24
23
21
12
2
1
9
11
11
12
13
14
15
10
13
9
8
92
46
54
40
232
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
4
4
20
EST
(90%
9.8
-0.4
0.4
-1.0
-1.6
-1.1
-4.8
0.0
1.7
2.8
2.0
-0.7
1.1
3.3
3. 1
-0.3
3.9
1.3
7.9
1.3
. REL.
CONF.
( 1.6
( -2.1
( -5.1
( -3.4
(-12.0
( -5.3
( -0.3
( 0.5
( -2.5
( -0.8
( 1.7
( 1.7
( -3.0
( 1.6
( -0.2
( 0.9
( -1.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 18.0)
0.0)
1.9)
, 1.2)
2.3)
5.4)
5.9)
3.5)
, 1.0)
, 3.1)
4.9)
4.5)
2.3)
6.2)
2.8)
, 14.9)
4.0)
ORGAN IZATION-001 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
20
22
4
6
14
25
11
18
12
22
21
15
9
18
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-0.6
-2.0
-9.0
-2.1
-1.7
-0.7
-1.2
-3.7
1. 1
1.0
0.7
-3.6
1.5
1.6
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.3
( -3.3
(-32.9
( -6.8
( -4.9
( -2.7
( -6.9
( -6.8
( -3.5
( -1.6
( -LI
( -6.7
( -4.3
( -2.2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 1.1)
, -0.7)
, 15.0)
, 2.7)
1.5)
, 1.3)
4.4)
, -0.5)
5.8)
3.6)
, 2.5)
, -0.5)
7.4)
, 5.4)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
250130016
250230004
250270020
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
7
4
6
6
7
7
6
7
REGION 1
AIRS ID
230110016
A
QUARTER
1
1
EST
)0%
.7 (
.4 (
.5 (
.9 (
.7 (
.5 (
.2 (
.2 (
. REL.
CONF.
5.8,
3.5,
5.1,
6.0,
6.8,
6.6,
5.3,
6.7,
RMSE
(contl
INTERVAL)
12.
6.
9.
8.
8.
8.
7.
7.
0)*
2)
2)
0)
7)
8)
5)
8)
STATE=ME REPORTING
EST
(90%
1
1
REGION-1
AIRS ID
230030013
230050027
230190002
230030013
230050027
230190002
230030013
230050027
230190002
230050027
230190002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
.9 (
.9 (
. REL.
CONF.
1.4,
1 .4,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
3.
1)
1)
STATE=ME REPORTING
EST
(90%
4
3
7
7
6
7
4
3
4
2
2
5
6
3
2
5
.7 (
.8 (
.5 (
.7 (
.0 (
.5 (
.3 (
.1 (
.4 (
.9 (
.8 (
.6 (
.9 (
.8 (
.8 (
.2 (
. REL.
CONF.
3.6,
2.9,
5.7,
5.3,
4.4,
4.9,
3.0,
2.3,
3.0,
2.1,
2.1,
4.8,
5.5,
3.1,
2.2,
4.6,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7.
5.
10.
14.
9.
17.
8.
4.
8.
4.
4.
7.
9.
5.
4.
5.
0)
8)
9)*
8)*
9)
8)*
3)
8)
4)
9)
7)
0)
5)
1)
0)
9)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
17
16
66
88
63
44
261
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
5
5
4
3
17
EST
(90%
1.6
-1.2
2.3
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.7
( -3.1
( -0.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
6.0)
, 0.7)
5.1)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
10
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
EST
(90%
-0.4
. REL.
CONF.
( -1.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.8)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
12
14
6
9
4
6
11
6
8
9
39
19
23
17
98
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
11
EST
(90%
-2.8
1. 1
3.9
-5.3
-3.3
6.7
-2.4
-0.4
3.4
1.2
-1.5
. REL.
CONF.
( -4.8
( -0.8
( 0.8
(-10.3
( -6.6
( 2.2
( -5.7
( -2.2
( 0.8
( -0.6
( -3.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -0.9)
3.1)
, 7.0)
, -0.2)
0.1)
, 11.3)
0.8)
1.4)
5.9)
, 3.1)
0.0)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
330070014
330110019
330070014
330110019
330070014
330110019
330070014
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
5.0 (
14.9 (
5.0 (
2.1 (
11 .9 (
6.8 (
3.1 (
14.2 (
3.5 (
9.9 (
3.1 (
10.0 (
. REL.
CONF.
2.6,
10.7,
3.1,
1 .4,
8.2,
4.6,
1.8,
10.3,
2.5,
7.4,
1 .8,
8.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
80.
25.
14.
4.
22.
14.
13.
23.
5.
15.
13.
12.
4)*
5)*
5)*
4)
8)*
3)*
7)*
3)*
9)
4)*
7)*
7)*
REGION-1 STATE-RI REPORTING
AIRS ID
440070022
440071010
440070022
440071010
440070022
440071010
440070022
440071010
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
4.7 (
5.0 (
3.7 (
5.8 (
4.6 (
9.1 (
1.3 (
4.1 (
4.9 (
4.8 (
7.3 (
3.1 (
5.5 (
. REL.
CONF.
3.3,
3.6,
2.8,
4.2,
3.5,
7.0,
0.9,
2.9,
3.8,
3.8,
6.0,
2.4,
4.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
8.
8.
5.
9.
7.
13.
2.
7.
7.
6.
9.
4.
6.
4)
6)
8)
5)
0)
6)*
4)
0)
0)
5)
6)
5)
4)
REGION 1 STATE VT REPORTING
AIRS ID
500070012
500070012
500070012
500070012
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
EST
(90%
4.2 (
3.1 (
3.6 (
3.4 (
4.2 (
3.1 (
. REL.
CONF.
3.3,
2.4,
2.6,
2.6,
3.3,
2.4,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.
4.
6.
5.
6.
4.
0)
6)
0)
1)
0)
6)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
1
8
3
5
6
5
2
9
8
11
2
30
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
7
EST
(90%
5.0
-3.0
4.4
0. 1
7.6
0.9
2.8
. REL.
CONF
(-13
( -0.
( -2.
( -0.
( -6.
( -5.
.4
.2
.1
.6
.3
.8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
7.5)
, 9.1)
2.3)
, 15.9)
, 8.1)
, 11.4)
ORGAN IZATION-001 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
7
8
11
9
12
13
7
8
15
20
25
15
75
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
0.7
-0.5
2.6
-4.9
3.7
-2.8
0.5
1.2
. REL.
CONF
( -2.
( -4.
( 1
( -6.
( 2.
( -7.
( -0.
( -1.
.9
.0
.1
.9
.3
.3
.4
.7
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.4)
3.1)
, 4.1)
, -2.8)
5.2)
1.7)
, 1.5)
4.0)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
16
13
9
12
16
13
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-1.9
-1.5
-1.5
-2.8
. REL.
CONF
( -3.
( -2.
( -3.
( -3.
.6
.9
.7
.8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -0.2)
, -0.1)
0.6)
, -1.8)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
A
(!
3
3
3
)0!
.6
.4
.6
REGION 2
6 CONF.
( 2.6,
( 2.6,
( 3.1,
(contl
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.0)
5.1)
4.4)
STATE=NJ REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
340070003
340171003
340390004
340070003
340171003
340390004
340070003
340171003
340390004
340070003
340171003
340390004
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90% CONF.
4
7
3
5
6
4
3
6
5
12
8
12
5
5
5
11
6
.9
.5
.1
.1
.8
.7
.1
.2
.5
.0
.9
.5
.1
.5
.1
.0
.7
REGION-2
( 3.7,
( 5.4,
( 2.3,
( 3.7,
( 5.0,
( 3.6,
( 2.4,
( 4.7,
( 4.2,
( 8.1,
( 6.6,
( 9.1,
( 4.3,
( 4.6,
( 4.3,
( 9.0,
( 6.1,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7.3)
12.9)*
4.6)
8.4)
10.9)*
6.9)
4.6)
9.3)
8.1)
25. 1)*
14.1)*
20.6)*
6.4)
7.0)
6.2)
14.5)*
7.5)
STATE=NY REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
360010005
360050110
360556001
360610056
360610062
360632008
360671015
360810094
360010005
360050110
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
(!
2
4
3
2
5
4
7
4
13
2
)0!
.8
.5
.1
.0
.5
.3
.2
.6
.8
.7
6 CONF.
( 2.2,
( 3.6,
( 2.4,
( 1.7,
( 4.4,
( 3.2,
( 5.5,
( 3.7,
( 10.8,
( 2.1,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
4.0)
6.1)
4.4)
2.6)
7.3)
6.8)
10.4)*
6.3)
19.3)*
3.7)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
12
50
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
4
EST
(90%
. REL.
CONF
BIAS
INTERVAL)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
8
13
9
10
14
13
12
13
5
10
9
34
33
38
24
129
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
12
EST
(90%
-2.1
2.2
1.3
-1.5
-2.9
-1.5
0.4
-0.1
-0.3
-5.6
4.3
6.9
. REL.
CONF
( -4.
( -2.
( -0.
( -4.
( -6.
( -3.
( -1.
( -3.
( -3.
(-17
( -0.
( -0.
.4
.9
.2
.7
.7
.7
.2
.5
.1
.0
.4
.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.2)
7.4)
2.7)
1.7)
0.9)
, 0.7)
2.0)
3.2)
, 2.5)
5.7)
9.0)
, 13.7)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
17
19
16
27
22
10
14
20
17
18
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
1.4
-0.6
-0.8
0.0
-1.6
-3.9
-4.1
2.6
-3.4
0.7
. REL.
CONF
( 0.
( -2.
( -2.
( -0.
( -3.
( -5.
( -7.
( 1
( -9.
( -0.
.3
.4
.1
.6
.5
.0
.0
.0
.3
.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.5)
, 1.2)
0.6)
, 0.7)
0.4)
, -2.8)
, -1.2)
, 4.1)
2.4)
, 1.8)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
360556001
360610056
360610062
360632008
360671015
360810094
360010005
360050110
360556001
360610056
360610062
360632008
360671015
360810094
360010005
360050110
360556001
360610056
360610062
360632008
360671015
360810094
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
2.8 (
3.1 (
12.3 (
3.2 (
3.3 (
2.4 (
2.4 (
2.8 (
2.7 (
1.6 (
1.7 (
10.1 (
3.6 (
23.5 (
2.2 (
4.0 (
2.5 (
1.8 (
1.8 (
2.3 (
1.8 (
2.5 (
4.4 (
7.2 (
9.1 (
2.5 (
6.5 (
. REL.
CONF
2.
2.
10.
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
2.
2.
1 .
1 .
8.
2.
18.
1 .
3.
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
4.
6.
8.
2.
6.
RMSE
(contl
. INTERVAL)
3,
5,
1,
5,
5,
9,
9,
3,
1,
3,
4,
3,
8,
9,
8,
2,
9,
5,
5,
9,
4,
0,
0,
6,
4,
3,
2,
3.
4.
16.
4.
5.
3.
3.
3.
3.
2.
2.
12.
5.
31.
3.
5.
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
3.
4.
7.
10.
2.
6.
9)
0)
1)*
5)
1)
2)
3)
6)
7)
0)
1)
9)*
0)
4)*
0)
2)
6)
3)
3)
2)
5)
3)
8)
9)
0)
7)
8)
REGION-2 STATE-PR REPORTING
AIRS ID
720610005
721270003
720610005
721270003
720610005
721270003
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
2
3
3
4
4
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
4.3 (
2.0 (
3.7 (
2.1 (
9.8 (
3.7 (
3.0 (
3.1 (
7.1 (
4.9 (
. REL.
CONF
3.
1 .
2.
1 .
7.
2.
2.
2.
5.
4.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
0,
5,
8,
6,
2,
7,
4,
5,
7,
2,
8.
3.
5.
3.
16.
5.
4.
4.
9.
5.
3)
1)
8)
4)
2)*
7)
2)
1)
7)
8)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
20
27
26
17
12
22
20
27
18
28
29
28
17
22
20
24
15
26
27
20
19
22
145
159
189
173
666
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
32
EST
(90%
0.9
-1.0
-2. 1
-1.5
2.2
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.1
0. 1
-0.3
-0.7
-0. 1
-1.9
0.7
-1.1
-1.3
0.2
0.4
0.0
-0.2
-0.5
. REL.
CONF.
( -0.2
( -1.9
( -6.3
( -2.8
( 0.9
( -0.5
( -0.7
( -0.3
( -1.0
( -0.4
( -0.8
( -3.9
( -1.6
(-10.7
( -0.2
( -2.4
( -2.3
( -0.5
( -0.2
( -0.9
( -1.0
( -1.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.0)
0.0)
2.0)
, -0.3)
3.6)
, 1.3)
1.2)
, 1.5)
, 1.2)
0.6)
0.3)
2.6)
1.5)
6.9)
1.5)
0.3)
, -0.3)
0.8)
, 1.0)
0.9)
0.5)
0.4)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
6
11
11
10
9
11
17
21
20
58
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
EST
(90%
2.0
0.9
-0.5
-0.4
2.5
-1.0
. REL.
CONF.
( -1.5
( -0.1
( -2.6
( -1.7
( -3.8
( -3.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
5.5)
1.9)
, 1.6)
0.8)
8.8)
1.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
110010041
110010043
110010041
110010043
110010041
110010043
110010041
110010043
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90% CONF.
1 .9
3.3
21.0
11 .9
3.1
2.4
10.6
2.0
2.4
19.8
3.0
10.2
10.2
REGION-3
( 1.5,
( 2.3,
( 15.5,
( 6.8,
( 2.3,
( 1.4,
( 7.9,
( 1.0,
( 2.0,
( 15.0,
( 2.2,
( 7.6,
( 8.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
2
6
33
52
5
10
16
32
3
30
4
15
12
STATE=DE
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
100031012
100032004
100031012
100032004
100031012
100032004
100031012
100032004
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
4.0
13.5
8.9
3.5
6.2
5.1
8.2
2.9
10.4
5.8
5.7
6.7
7.2
REGION 3
6 CONF.
( 3.1,
( 10.6,
( 6.8,
( 2.9,
( 4.8,
( 3.9,
( 6.7,
( 2.3,
( 8.6,
( 4.9,
( 4.7,
( 5.7,
( 6.6,
•7)
.0)
.5)*
.3)*
•1)
.7)*
.9)*
.5)*
.2)
.0)*
.6)
.8)*
.1)*
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5
18
13
4
8
7
10
4
13
7
7
8
8
STATE=MD
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
240330001
245100035
240032002
240330001
245100035
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
2
(90!
4.4
2.5
2.9
4.1
3.3
6 CONF.
( 2.6,
( 1.7,
( 2.2,
( 3.2,
( 2.4,
.8)
.9)*
.0)*
•4)
.9)
.6)
.7)*
•2)
.1)*
.0)
.3)
.3)
.0)
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
19
4
4
5
5
.5)*
.4)
.0)
•7)
.5)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
17
7
10
2
9
2
10
1
24
12
11
11
58
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
0.0
0.6
-8.4
-9.8
-2.8
-2.4
-2.7
-2.0
. REL.
CONF.
( -o.
( -2.
(-20.
(-51.
( -3.
( -4.
( -9.
8
0
2
8
7
4
0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.8)
3.2)
3.3)
, 32.2)
, -1.9)
, -0.4)
3.6)
ORGAN IZATION-001 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
17
14
30
15
13
25
15
31
44
28
40
143
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
1.2
2.7
-0.3
0.4
1.4
-0.7
0.2
-1.7
. REL.
CONF.
( -o.
( -3.
( -4.
( -o.
( -1.
( -3.
( -2.
( -2.
7
0
6
7
4
3
6
8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.0)
8.5)
, 4.1)
1.5)
4.3)
, 1.9)
3.1)
, -0.5)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
2
7
17
17
9
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
3. 1
-1.5
-0.1
3.2
1.9
. REL.
CONF.
(-16.
( -3.
( -1.
( 2.
( o.
6
1
3
0
2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 22.9)
, 0.1)
, 1.1)
4.3)
, 3.7)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
240032002
240330001
245100035
240032002
240330001
245100035
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
1.3 (
2.3 (
1.7 (
3.1 (
4.8 (
6.4 (
3.0 (
3.5 (
1.8 (
5.1 (
3.6 (
. REL.
CONF
1 .
1 .
1 .
2.
3.
5.
2.
3.
1 .
4.
3.
RMSE
(contl
. INTERVAL)
0,
9,
4,
4,
9,
3,
2,
0,
6,
5,
3,
1.
3.
2.
4.
6.
8.
5.
4.
2.
5.
3.
6)
1)
2)
2)
4)
3)
0)
2)
1)
9)
9)
REGION-3 STATE-PA REPORTING
AIRS ID
420070014
420450002
420692006
420710007
421250005
421330008
420070014
420450002
420692006
420710007
421250005
421330008
420070014
420450002
420692006
420710007
421250005
421330008
420070014
420450002
420692006
420710007
421250005
421330008
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
EST
(90%
8.6 (
9.4 (
10.8 (
6.4 (
7.1 (
6.7 (
5.4 (
4.0 (
3.1 (
12.4 (
1.6 (
5.5 (
3.2 (
1.9 (
5.2 (
9.0 (
2.9 (
2.7 (
1.2 (
3.7 (
7.1 (
1.5 (
0.7 (
2.4 (
8.4 (
5.7 (
4.9 (
. REL.
CONF
6.
7.
8.
4.
5.
5.
4.
3.
2.
8.
1 .
4.
2.
1 .
3.
6.
2.
2.
0.
2.
5.
1 .
0.
1 .
7.
5.
4.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
5,
3,
2,
9,
2,
1,
1,
0,
3,
8,
2,
0,
2,
4,
9,
8,
2,
1,
9,
7,
1,
1,
5,
8,
4,
0,
3,
13.
13.
16.
9.
11.
10.
8.
6.
5.
22.
2.
8.
6.
3.
7.
13.
4.
3.
2.
5.
12.
2.
1.
3.
9.
6.
5.
1)*
5)*
0)*
3)
3)*
0)
0)
2)
4)
4)*
4)
7)
1)
1)
9)
7)*
4)
8)
2)
8)
2)*
3)
2)
5)
7)
8)
7)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
27
23
33
20
22
27
9
43
83
69
204
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
11
EST
(90%
0.3
-0.3
0.5
-1.3
-0.5
-1.2
. REL.
CONF.
( -0.1
( -LI
( -0.0
( -2.4
( -2.3
( -3.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.7)
0.6)
1.0)
, -0.2)
, 1.3)
0.9)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
15
13
14
10
13
13
11
8
7
13
10
6
10
12
12
12
15
7
10
8
11
8
13
77
62
67
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
EST
(90%
0.4
0.7
2.8
-2.3
-0.7
-0.2
0.9
2.3
0.7
-4.4
0.6
2. 1
-1.2
0.3
2.7
-2.3
1.5
1. 1
-0.7
0.5
-0.9
-0.3
-0. 1
1.8
. REL.
CONF.
( -4.3
( -3.7
( -2.5
( -5.2
( -5.0
( -3.7
( -1.8
( 0.5
( -1.5
(-13.6
( -0.2
( -1.0
( -3.9
( -0.9
( 0.3
( -7.0
( 0.2
( -0.0
( -1.5
( -1.7
( -6.0
( -1.2
( -0.6
( 1.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 5.1)
5.1)
8.2)
0.6)
3.6)
3.2)
3.6)
4.2)
2.9)
, 4.8)
1.4)
5.2)
, 1.5)
, 1.4)
5.1)
, 2.4)
2.9)
2.3)
, 0.1)
, 2.7)
, 4.1)
0.5)
0.4)
2.6)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
A
A
QUARTER
4
A
Dtrrn
(!
3
6
(contl
EST. REL. RMSE
)0% CONF. INTERVAL)
.4 ( 2.9, 4.0)
.1 ( 5.7, 6.5)
CTATT7-DA DPDHDTTWr
EST. REL. RMSE
AIRS ID
420030008
420030064
420031301
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
A
(!
3
3
2
3
3
m
.2
.1
.6
.0
.0
REGION-3
6 CONF.
( 2.3,
( 2.4,
( 2.0,
( 2.5,
( 2.5,
INTERVAL)
5
4
4
3
3
STATE=PA
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
421010004
421010004
421010004
421010004
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
3
6
3
1
3
6
3
1
3
)0!
.8
.4
.9
.7
.8
.4
.9
.7
.8
REGION 3
6 CONF.
( 2.8,
( 4.0,
( 3.0,
( 1.2,
( 2.8,
( 4.0,
( 3.0,
( 1.2,
( 3.1,
.4)
.7)
.0)
•7)
•7)
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6
18
6
2
6
18
6
2
4
STATE=VA
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
510130020
517100024
517600020
510130020
517100024
517600020
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
(!
5
3
2
7
3
4
)0!
.8
.0
.4
.6
.1
.7
6 CONF.
( 4.8,
( 2.4,
( 2.0,
( 6.2,
( 2.5,
( 3.8,
.i)
.7)*
.1)
•7)
•1)
.7)*
•1)
•7)
.7)
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7
4
3
9
4
6
.5)
.0)
.0)
.8)
•1)
.1)
nued)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER EST
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS (90%
57 6
263 24
ORGANIZATION 002 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER EST
OBSERVATIONS
8
12
12
32
32
QUARTERS
1
1
1
3
3
(90%
2.4
0.1
0.6
. REL.
CONF.
. REL.
CONF.
( 1.0
( -1.6
( -0.8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.9)
, 1.8)
2.0)
ORGAN IZATION-003 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
3
11
9
10
3
11
9
33
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
0.2
4.0
-1.2
0. 1
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.2
( -6.3
( -3.3
( -1.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.5)
, 14.3)
, 1.0)
1.2)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
27
21
37
26
25
24
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-0.0
-0. 1
-0.2
1.1
-1.8
1.5
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.0
( -1.3
( -0.9
( -1.5
( -2.7
( -0.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.9)
1.0)
0.4)
3.6)
, -0.9)
, 3.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
510130020
517100024
517600020
510130020
517100024
517600020
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(contl
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
4.3 ( 3.5, 5.5)
5.5 ( 4.5, 7.2)
2.3 ( 1.9, 2.9)
4.2 ( 3.4, 5.5)
3.3 ( 2.7, 4.4)
2.8 ( 2.2, 3.6)
3.9 ( 3.5, 4.5)
5.5 ( 4.8, 6.3)
4.2 ( 3.7, 4.8)
3.5 ( 3.1, 4.0)
4.3 ( 4.1, 4.6)
REGION-3 STATE-WV REPORTING
AIRS ID
540391005
540391005
540391005
540391005
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
6.2 ( 5.0, 8.0)
2.3 ( 1.9, 3.0)
2.6 ( 2.1, 3.4)
2.7 ( 2.2, 3.6)
6.2 ( 5.0, 8.0)
2.3 ( 1.9, 3.0)
2.6 ( 2.1, 3.4)
2.7 ( 2.2, 3.6)
3.8 ( 3.4, 4.3)
REGION-3 STATE-WV REPORTING
AIRS ID
540290011
540290011
540290011
540290011
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
3.9 ( 3.2, 5.0)
3.5 ( 2.8, 4.7)
5.6 ( 4.6, 7.2)
3.3 ( 2.6, 4.3)
3.9 ( 3.2, 5.0)
3.5 ( 2.8, 4.7)
5.6 ( 4.6, 7.2)
3.3 ( 2.6, 4.3)
4.2 ( 3.8, 4.8)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
29
26
30
25
24
24
85
75
85
73
318
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -1.0 ( -2.3
1 -1.7 ( -3.5
1 -0.9 (-1.6
1 -0.7 ( -2.2
1 -0.4 ( -1.6
1 -0.9 ( -1.9
3
3
3
3
12
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.4)
, 0.1)
, -0.3)
0.7)
0.8)
, -0.0)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
27
27
26
23
27
27
26
23
103
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -1.5 ( -3.5
1 -1.2 ( -1 .8
1 -1.0 ( -1.8
1 -0.6 ( -1.6
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.5)
, -0.5)
, -0.2)
0.3)
ORGAN IZATI ON-002 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
28
20
27
23
28
20
27
23
98
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.7 ( -2.0
1 -0.4 ( -1.7
1 -1.5 ( -3.3
1 -1.6 ( -2.6
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.5)
, 1.0)
0.3)
, -0.6)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
010970002
011010007
010970002
011010007
010970002
011010007
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
2
3
3
4
4
2
3
4
A
(90% CONF.
21 .7
10.4
3.6
5.2
2.8
4.8
16.7
4.7
4.0
9.1
REGION 4
( 15.
( 7.
( 2.
( 4.
( 2.
( 3.
( 13.
( 3.
( 3.
( 8.
6,
6,
7,
1,
1,
7,
1,
8,
3,
0,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
37
17
5
7
4
7
23
6
5
10
STATE=AL
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
010730023
010731005
010732003
010732006
010735002
010730023
010731005
010732003
010732006
010735002
010730023
010731005
010732003
010732006
010735002
010730023
010731005
010732003
010732006
010735002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
10.7
6.0
8.6
12.1
7.8
9.4
9.3
6.1
5.3
7.5
6.8
8.5
7.2
10.8
6.7
8.2
13.1
6.2
8.9
9.0
9.1
7.7
7.7
8.4
8.2
6 CONF
( 7.
( 4.
( 6.
( 7.
( 5.
( 7.
( 6.
( 4.
( 3.
( 4.
( 5.
( 5.
( 5.
( 7.
( 4.
( 6.
( 8.
( 4.
( 5.
( 5.
( 7.
( 6.
( 6.
( 7.
( 7.
.1)*
.1)*
.7)
.5)
•2)
.0)
.4)*
•1)
.2)
.7)*
REPORTING
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
8,
0,
5,
5,
2,
0,
1,
6,
4,
7,
2,
7,
3,
0,
5,
1,
5,
8,
8,
9,
6,
5,
5,
1,
5,
17
12
13
35
16
14
22
9
12
22
10
17
11
25
14
12
31
9
21
21
11
9
9
10
9
.7)*
.5)*
.0)*
.4)*
.2)*
.6)*
.1)*
.0)
.6)*
.0)*
.1)*
.8)*
.5)*
.5)*
.1)*
.7)*
.0)*
.1)
.1)*
.4)*
.5)*
.6)
.5)
.4)*
•1)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
8 1
9 1
10 1
15 1
12 1
14 1
17 2
25 2
26 2
68 6
EST
(90%
-6.
3.
2.
-0.
0.
1.
6
0
2
9
7
3
. REL.
CONF.
(-21 .4
( -3.5
( 0.5
( -3.3
( -0.7
( -1.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
8.1)
9.5)
3.9)
1.6)
2.2)
3.6)
ORGANIZATION 012 METHOD 116
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
9 1
5 1
12 1
3 1
5 1
11 1
4 1
13 1
4 1
3 1
13 1
5 1
10 1
4 1
5 1
11 1
4 1
14 1
4 1
4 1
34 5
35 5
37 5
37 5
143 20
EST
(90%
-1.
-2.
0.
-3.
5.
-0.
8.
1.
-4.
4.
-1.
3.
-1.
-1.
3.
-1.
2.
-0.
-4.
5.
5
7
4
9
9
0
5
0
1
5
2
1
0
6
8
9
3
7
4
3
. REL.
CONF.
( -8.5
( -8.4
( -4.3
(-27.6
( 0.5
( -5.4
( 3.5
( -2.1
( -8.6
( -7.9
( -4.6
( -5.4
( -5.3
(-16.1
( -2.1
( -6.5
(-15.2
( -3.8
(-14.9
( -4.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
5.5)
2.9)
5.0)
, 19.9)
, 11.3)
5.3)
, 13.6)
4.1)
0.3)
, 17.0)
2.3)
, 11.6)
3.4)
, 12.8)
, 9.7)
, 2.7)
, 19.8)
2.3)
6.0)
, 15.2)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
010890014
010890014
010890014
010890014
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
REGION 4
AIRS ID
120330004
A
QUARTER
1
1
.4 (
.0 (
•1 (
.3 (
.4 (
.0 (
•1 (
.3 (
.7 (
. REL.
CONF.
1.1,
1 .5,
0.9,
1 .8,
1.1,
1.5,
0.9,
1 .8,
1.5,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
1.9)
3.0)
1.6)
3.3)
1.9)
3.0)
1.6)
3.3)
2.1)
STATE=FL REPORTING
EST
(90%
9
9
REGION-4
AIRS ID
120010023
120010023
120010023
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
1
2
3
A
.3 (
.3 (
. REL.
CONF.
7.2,
7.2,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
13.6)*
13.6)*
STATE=FL REPORTING
EST
(90%
7
21
12
7
21
12
14
REGION 4
AIRS ID
121171002
121171002
121171002
121171002
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
(!
13
3
6
2
13
.6 (
.1 (
•1 (
.6 (
.1 (
•1 (
.0 (
. REL.
CONF.
5.8,
15.6,
9.2,
5.8,
15.6,
9.2,
11.7,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
11.1)*
33.6)*
18.4)*
11.1)*
33.6)*
18.4)*
17.4)*
STATE=FL REPORTING
EST
)0%
.5 (
.3 (
•1 (
.0 (
.5 (
. REL.
CONF.
10.2,
2.5,
4.6,
1 .5,
10.2,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
20.5)*
4.9)
9.3)
2.9)
20.5)*
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
16
13
14
15
16
13
14
15
58
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 0.3 ( -0.3
1 1.4 ( 0.7
1 -0.0 ( -0.6
1 0. 1 ( -0.9
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.9)
2.2)
0.5)
1.2)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
14
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.7 ( -5.2
1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.9)
ORGAN IZATION-002 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
10
12
14
10
12
36
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.9 ( -4.6
1 -4.2 (-16.8
1 -1.7 ( -8.2
1
1
1
3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.8)
8.4)
, 4.8)
ORGANIZATION 003 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
12
12
13
12
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 0.3 ( -7.0
1 1.7 ( 0.2
1 2.7 ( -0.3
1 0. 1 ( -1 .0
1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
7.6)
3.2)
, 5.7)
1.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
4
A
(contl
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
3.3 ( 2.5, 4.9)
6.1 ( 4.6, 9.3)
2.0 ( 1.5, 2.9)
7.6 ( 6.5, 9.1)
REGION-4 STATE-FL REPORTING
AIRS ID
121056006
121056006
121056006
121056006
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
1.8 ( 1.3, 2.8)
3.7 ( 2.8, 5.8)
3.4 ( 2.5, 5.5)
3.1 ( 2.3, 4.7)
1.8 ( 1.3, 2.8)
3.7 ( 2.8, 5.8)
3.4 ( 2.5, 5.5)
3.1 ( 2.3, 4.7)
3.1 ( 2.6, 3.8)
REGION-4 STATE-FL REPORTING
AIRS ID
120710005
120710005
120710005
120710005
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
2.0 ( 1.4, 3.7)
2.3 ( 1.7, 3.2)
3.4 ( 2.7, 4.7)
4.1 ( 3.3, 5.3)
2.0 ( 1.4, 3.7)
2.3 ( 1.7, 3.2)
3.4 ( 2.7, 4.7)
4.1 ( 3.3, 5.3)
3.3 ( 2.9, 3.9)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
12
13
49
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
ORGAN IZATION-004 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
11
10
11
10
11
10
11
42
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 0. 1 ( -1 .0
1 -0.4 ( -2.6
1 1. 1 ( -0.8
1 0.4 ( -1.3
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.2)
1.7)
3.1)
2.2)
ORGAN IZATION-005 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
6
15
17
24
6
15
17
24
62
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 1. 1 ( -0.3
1 -0.0 (-1.1
1 1.5 ( 0.1
1 3.3 ( 2.5
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.6)
1.1)
2.8)
, 4.2)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
121111002
121111002
121111002
121111002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
3
4
5
2
3
4
5
2
3
REGION 4
AIRS ID
120310099
120310099
120310099
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
4
1
2
4
A
.4 (
.1 (
.5 (
.3 (
.4 (
.1 (
.5 (
.3 (
.9 (
. REL.
CONF
2.
3.
3.
1 .
2.
3.
3.
1 .
3.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
4,
1,
9,
7,
4,
1,
9,
7,
3,
6.
6.
9.
3.
6.
6.
9.
3.
4.
2)
4)
9)
8)
2)
4)
9)
8)
9)
STATE=FL REPORTING
EST
(90%
4
3
1
4
3
1
3
REGION 4
AIRS ID
120570030
120570030
120570030
120570030
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
.9 (
.7 (
.7 (
.9 (
.7 (
.7 (
.7 (
. REL.
CONF
3.
2.
1 .
3.
2.
1 .
3.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
6,
6,
3,
6,
6,
3,
0,
7.
7.
2.
7.
7.
2.
4.
5)
2)
6)
5)
2)
6)
7)
STATE=FL REPORTING
EST
(90%
2
14
4
12
2
14
4
12
9
.3 (
.3 (
.8 (
.9 (
.3 (
.3 (
.8 (
.9 (
.9 (
. REL.
CONF
1 .
10.
3.
9.
1 .
10.
3.
9.
8.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
8,
9,
7,
8,
8,
9,
7,
8,
6,
3.
21.
6.
19.
3.
21.
6.
19.
11.
5)
2)*
9)
2)*
5)
2)*
9)
2)*
8)*
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
7
11
7
9
7
11
7
9
34
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 2.2 ( 0.1
1 -0.6 ( -2.9
1 1.2 ( -3.0
1 -0. 1 ( -1 .7
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.3)
1.7)
5.5)
1.4)
ORGANIZATION Oil METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
6
11
11
6
11
28
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 3.3 ( 1.3
1 1.6 ( -1 .4
1 -0.2 ( -1.2
1
1
1
3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
5.3)
4.6)
, 0.7)
ORGANIZATION 012 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
13
14
13
13
13
14
13
53
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.4 ( -1.6
1 6.1 ( -0.6
1 0.4 ( -2.0
1 -1.7 ( -8.2
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 0.7)
, 12.7)
2.7)
4.9)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
121030018
121030018
121030018
121030018
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
11.4 ( 8.6, 17.2)*
2.8 ( 2.1, 4.1)
4.7 ( 3.6, 6.9)
3.9 ( 2.9, 6.1)
11.4 ( 8.6, 17.2)*
2.8 ( 2.1, 4.1)
4.7 ( 3.6, 6.9)
3.9 ( 2.9, 6.1)
6.5 ( 5.6, 7.8)
REGION 4 STATE FL REPORTING
AIRS ID
121150013
121150013
121150013
121150013
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
2.2 ( 1.7, 3.2)
3.4 ( 2.5, 5.6)
4.0 ( 3.0, 6.1)
2.9 ( 2.2, 4.5)
2.2 ( 1.7, 3.2)
3.4 ( 2.5, 5.6)
4.0 ( 3.0, 6.1)
2.9 ( 2.2, 4.5)
3.1 ( 2.7, 3.8)
REGION-4 STATE-FL REPORTING
AIRS ID
120992003
120992003
120992003
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
3
4
1
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
2.0 ( 1.4, 3.4)
5.5 ( 3.7, 11.5)*
4.0 ( 3.0, 6.0)
2.0 ( 1.4, 3.4)
5.5 ( 3.7, 11.5)*
4.0 ( 3.0, 6.0)
3.9 ( 3.1, 5.0)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
13
14
11
12
13
14
11
50
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 4. 1 ( -1 .7
1 0.8 ( -0.6
1 0.4 ( -1.9
1 1.0 ( -1 .2
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
9.8)
2.2)
, 2.7)
3.2)
ORGANIZATION 015 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
15
9
11
12
15
9
11
12
47
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 0.0 ( -1.0
1 -0.9 ( -3.1
1 0.1 ( -2.2
1 -1.5 ( -2.9
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 1.1)
1.3)
2.3)
, -0.1)
ORGAN IZATI ON-0 1 6 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
8
5
12
8
5
12
25
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 1.5 ( 0.7
1 0.1 ( -5.8
1 -1.0 ( -3.1
1
1
1
3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.4)
5.9)
, 1.0)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
120111002
120111002
120111002
120111002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
3.2 ( 2.4, 5.1)
27.7 ( 21 .0, 42.0)*
6.8 ( 5.1, 10.5)*
5.4 ( 4.0, 8.6)
3.2 ( 2.4, 5.1)
27.7 ( 21.0, 42.0)*
6.8 ( 5.1, 10.5)*
5.4 ( 4.0, 8.6)
15.4 ( 13.1, 18.7)*
REGION 4 STATE FL REPORTING
AIRS ID
120952002
120952002
120952002
120952002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
2.4 ( 1.8, 3.5)
3.5 ( 2.6, 5.1)
4.8 ( 3.6, 7.1)
3.3 ( 2.5, 5.0)
2.4 ( 1.8, 3.5)
3.5 ( 2.6, 5.1)
4.8 ( 3.6, 7.1)
3.3 ( 2.5, 5.0)
3.6 ( 3.1, 4.3)
REGION-4 STATE-FL REPORTING
AIRS ID
120170005
A
QUARTER
4
4
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
3.1 ( 2.5, 4.3)
3.1 ( 2.5, 4.3)
REGION 4 STATE GA REPORTING
AIRS ID
130210007
130510017
130892001
QUARTER
1
1
1
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
6.9 ( 5.3, 10.3)*
6.9 ( 5.3, 10.1)*
5.8 ( 4.3, 9.0)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
12
11
10
10
12
11
10
43
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 0.2 (-1.8
1 -6.9 (-21.4
1 -1.7 ( -5.5
1 -1.9 ( -5.0
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.1)
7.7)
2.0)
1.2)
ORGANIZATION 020 METHOD 1 18
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
52
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.7 ( -1.8
1 -1.8 ( -3.3
1 -1.1 ( -3.5
1 -0.2 ( -1.9
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.5)
, -0.2)
, 1.3)
, 1.5)
ORGAN IZATION-039 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
20
20
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.2 (-1.4
1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.1)
ORGANIZATION 010 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
14
11
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -4.1 ( -7.0
1 3.6 ( 0.8
1 2.0 ( -1.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.2)
6.5)
, 5.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
131210032
132150001
132450005
130210007
130510017
130892001
131210032
132150001
132450005
130210007
130510017
130892001
131210032
132150001
132450005
130210007
130510017
130892001
131210032
132150001
132450005
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
3.4
3.6
4.9
2.8
7.8
6.3
5.8
2.8
6.4
2.1
3.0
2.2
4.0
3.2
2.7
7.1
4.1
5.7
12.9
5.1
6.7
5.6
5.5
3.0
7.5
5.7
REGION 4
6 CONF
( 2.
( 2.
( 3.
( 2.
( 5.
( 4.
( 4.
( 2.
( 4.
( 1.
( 2.
( 1.
( 2.
( 2.
( 1.
( 5.
( 3.
( 4.
( 9.
( 3.
( 4.
( 4.
( 4.
( 2.
( 6.
( 5.
RMSE
(contl
. INTERVAL)
5,
8,
2,
1,
6,
8,
2,
1,
6,
5,
1,
5,
8,
4,
9,
1,
0,
3,
4,
7,
9,
9,
8,
5,
5,
3,
5.
5.
11.
4.
13.
9.
9.
4.
11.
3.
5.
5.
7.
4.
4.
12.
6.
8.
21.
8.
11.
6.
6.
3.
8.
6.
5)
5)
6)*
5)
3)*
3)
5)
4)
0)*
5)
8)
3)
1)
7)
9)
2)*
8)
9)
2)*
4)
0)*
6)
5)
6)
9)
2)
STATE=KY REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
210190017
210670012
211950002
212270007
210190017
210590014
210670012
211950002
212270007
210190017
210590014
210670012
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
(90!
3.3
5.0
7.0
1.7
2.8
11.7
3.0
2.1
6.3
3.8
5.4
7.3
6 CONF
( 2.
( 3.
( 5.
( 1.
( 2.
( 8.
( 2.
( 1.
( 4.
( 2.
( 4.
( 5.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
5,
8,
1,
3,
0,
7,
3,
6,
8,
9,
1,
5,
5.
7.
11.
2.
5.
18.
4.
3.
9.
5.
7.
10.
0)
3)
5)*
4)
0)
7)*
6)
2)
4)
6)
9)
8)*
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
12
4
10
8
13
9
10
8
8
6
4
7
13
7
8
9
11
9
9
9
64
58
45
55
222
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
24
EST
(90%
1.3
-0.6
1.7
0.5
4.9
1.1
1.0
-1.4
4.1
1.8
1.3
0.5
3.5
-1.4
-0.9
6.1
0.7
1.5
6.2
0.3
-3.7
. REL.
CONF.
( -0.6
( -2.5
( -4.6
( -1-1
( 0.5
( -2.1
( -2.8
( -2.8
( 0.7
( 1.0
( -LI
( -2.4
( 2.1
( -2.8
( -2.9
( 3.4
( -2.0
( -1-7
( -1.3
( -3.1
( -7.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.2)
, 1.3)
7.9)
2.2)
9.2)
, 4.3)
4.7)
, 0.1)
, 7.6)
2.5)
3.8)
3.5)
4.9)
0.1)
1.2)
8.8)
3.3)
4.7)
, 13.6)
3.6)
, -0.0)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
14
9
15
7
10
12
12
13
14
14
13
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-1.6
1.5
-1.0
-0.1
0.5
-1.4
2.4
0.5
-2.4
-0.5
-0.5
3.2
. REL.
CONF.
( -3.2
( -0.8
( -5.6
( -0.9
( -1.7
( -8.6
( 1.4
( -0.6
( -5.4
( -2.4
( -3.1
( -0.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -0.1)
3.9)
3.5)
, 0.7)
, 2.7)
, 5.7)
3.4)
1.6)
0.6)
, 1.4)
2.1)
6.6)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
211950002
212270007
210190017
210590014
210670012
211950002
212270007
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
5.0
4.6
4.8
5.0
8.3
3.0
2.7
4.4
6.3
5.3
5.3
5.4
REGION-4
6 CONF.
( 3.8,
( 3.5,
( 3.7,
( 3.8,
( 6.4,
( 2.2,
( 2.1,
( 3.8,
( 5.4,
( 4.7,
( 4.6,
( 5.0,
(contl
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7
6
7
7
12
4
4
5
7
6
6
5
STATE=KY
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
211110043
211110043
211110043
211110043
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
2.8
5.8
10.0
2.9
2.8
5.8
10.0
2.9
6.3
REGION 4
6 CONF.
( 2.1,
( 4.5,
( 7.6,
( 2.1,
( 2.1,
( 4.5,
( 7.6,
( 2.1,
( 5.4,
.3)
.9)
.3)
.5)
.1)*
.7)
•1)
.2)
.5)
•2)
.3)
.8)
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
4
8
15
4
4
8
15
4
7
STATE=MS
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
280330002
280350004
281210001
280330002
280350004
280670002
281210001
280330002
280350004
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
(90!
3.6
3.2
4.4
2.3
3.1
3.3
11.4
5.2
3.1
6 CONF.
( 2.8,
( 2.5,
( 3.2,
( 1.7,
( 2.4,
( 2.3,
( 8.2,
( 4.0,
( 2.4,
•4)
.5)
.2)*
.8)
•4)
.5)
.2)*
.8)
.7)
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5
4
7
3
4
5
19
7
4
.5)
.7)
.2)
•4)
.6)
.9)
.5)*
.5)
.6)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
12
12
13
14
10
13
50
54
67
62
233
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
5
5
5
19
EST
(90%
2.3
-1.0
-2.3
-1.8
2.3
-0.2
-0.8
. REL.
CONF
( o
( -3.
( -4.
( -4.
( -1.
( -2
( -2
.1
.4
.6
.2
.6
.0
.2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.4)
, 1.5)
0.1)
0.7)
6.2)
, 1.6)
0.5)
ORGAN IZATION-002 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
14
12
9
11
14
12
9
46
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
-1.2
2.3
4.2
1.2
. REL.
CONF
( -2
( -0.
( -0.
( -0.
.7
.4
.7
.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.3)
4.9)
, 9.1)
2.9)
ORGANIZATION 100 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
14
9
13
14
7
8
15
14
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
1.4
0.5
-1.2
1.9
0.5
-1.7
-3.0
1.7
-1.0
. REL.
CONF
( -0.
( -1.
( -4.
( 1
( -1.
( -3.
(-10
( -0.
( -2
.4
.0
.0
.2
.0
.9
.9
.6
.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.2)
, 2.1)
, 1.5)
2.5)
2.1)
0.6)
4.9)
4.0)
0.4)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
280670002
281210001
280330002
280350004
280670002
281210001
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
2.6 (
3.9 (
9.0 (
3.3 (
4.0 (
6.5 (
3.7 (
5.6 (
3.9 (
6.3 (
4.7 (
. REL.
CONF
2.
2.
6.
2.
2.
4.
3.
4.
3.
5.
4.
RMSE
(contl
. INTERVAL)
0,
9,
1,
2,
6,
4,
1,
8,
3,
0,
3,
3.
6.
18.
7.
9.
13.
4.
6.
4.
8.
5.
8)
1)
8)*
9)
4)
6)*
6)
9)
6)
8)
2)
REGION-4 STATE-NC REPORTING
AIRS ID
370510009
370710016
370810009
371210001
371290009
371470005
371830014
370510009
370710016
370810009
371210001
371290009
371470005
371830014
370510009
370710016
370810009
371210001
371290009
371470005
371830014
370510009
370710016
370810009
371210001
371290009
371470005
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
EST
(90%
11.2 (
6.6 (
1.9 (
3.0 (
1.6 (
3.4 (
13.7 (
1.9 (
2.4 (
5.7 (
2.6 (
2.7 (
5.2 (
3.9 (
4.5 (
1.8 (
3.4 (
3.2 (
2.7 (
4.1 (
4.3 (
1.3 (
2.4 (
2.6 (
1.7 (
2.5 (
1.7 (
. REL.
CONF
8.
5.
1 .
2.
1 .
2.
10.
1 .
1 .
4.
2.
1 .
4.
3.
3.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
1 .
1 .
2.
1 .
1 .
1 .
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
6,
0,
4,
3,
2,
6,
3,
4,
9,
2,
0,
9,
0,
0,
5,
4,
5,
5,
0,
1,
3,
0,
8,
0,
3,
9,
3,
16.
9.
3.
4.
2.
5.
20.
2.
3.
9.
3.
4.
7.
5.
6.
2.
5.
4.
4.
6.
6.
2.
3.
3.
2.
3.
2.
3)*
8)
0)
6)
6)
0)
7)*
9)
5)
4)
9)
8)
7)
8)
5)
7)
2)
6)
2)
0)
2)
0)
5)
9)
5)
8)
7)
nued)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
15 1
11 1
5 1
4 1
4 1
5 1
35 3
42 4
55 4
18 4
150 15
EST
(90%
-1
0
7
1
1
4
.9
.9
.5
.9
.6
.8
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.7
( -1.3
( 2.2
( -1.9
( -3.4
( 0.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.0)
, 3.1)
, 12.8)
5.6)
6.5)
9.5)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
14 1
13 1
10 1
12 1
9 1
13 1
12 1
12 1
15 1
9 1
13 1
7 1
13 1
13 1
15 1
12 1
11 1
15 1
11 1
13 1
15 1
12 1
13 1
12 1
14 1
12 1
11 1
EST
(90%
2
-0
0
1
0
-1
2
0
0
2
0
0
-1
-2
2
-0
-0
2
-0
2
-3
1
0
1
-0
-1
0
.1
.0
.0
.4
.4
.2
.4
.7
.2
.8
.4
.6
.0
.5
.0
.2
.2
.0
.1
.3
.5
. 1
.6
.7
.5
.3
.1
. REL.
CONF.
( -3.3
( -3.4
( -LI
( -0.0
( -0.7
( -2.8
( -4.8
( -0.2
( -0.9
( -0.4
( -0.9
( -1.5
( -3.6
( -4.0
( 0.1
( -1.2
( -2.1
( 0.8
( -1.6
( 0.6
( -4.7
( 0.7
( -0.6
( 0.6
( -1.3
( -2.5
( -0.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 7.5)
3.4)
, 1.2)
2.9)
1.4)
0.4)
, 9.7)
1.7)
1.4)
, 6.1)
1.7)
2.6)
, 1.6)
, -1.0)
3.9)
, 0.7)
, 1.8)
3.2)
, 1.5)
4.0)
, -2.4)
1.5)
1.8)
2.8)
0.4)
, -0.1)
, 1.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
371830014
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
4
1
2
3
4
A
(contl
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
12.2 ( 9.4, 17.8)*
7.7 ( 6.8, 8.8)
3.7 ( 3.3, 4.2)
3.6 ( 3.2, 4. 1)
5.2 ( 4.7, 6.0)
5.3 ( 5.0, 5.6)
REGION 4 STATE NC REPORTING
AIRS ID
370670024
370670024
370670024
370670024
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
1 .9 ( 1 .5, 2.8)
1.8 ( 1.3, 2.8)
3.1 ( 2.3, 4.7)
1 .4 ( 1.1, 2.3)
1.9 ( 1.5, 2.8)
1.8 ( 1.3, 2.8)
3.1 ( 2.3, 4.7)
1.4 ( 1.1, 2.3)
2.2 ( 1.9, 2.6)
REGION 4 STATE NC REPORTING
AIRS ID
371190040
371190040
371190040
371190042
371190042
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
1.5 ( 1.1, 2.2)
2.0 ( 1.5, 3.1)
2.1 ( 1.6, 3.1)
2.0 ( 1.1, 8.7)
1.8 ( 1.4, 2.6)
1 .5 ( 1.1, 2.2)
2.0 ( 1.5, 3.1)
2.0 ( 1.6, 3.0)
1.8 ( 1.4, 2.6)
1 .8 ( 1 .6, 2.2)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
83
82
92
88
345
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -3. 1 ( -8.9
7
7
7
7
28
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.7)
ORGANIZATION 002 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
10
12
10
14
10
12
10
46
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0. 1 ( -1 .0
1 1.3 ( 0.5
1 0.5 ( -1.2
1 -0. 1 ( -1 .0
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.8)
2.0)
, 2.1)
0.7)
ORGANIZATION 003 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
12
12
2
14
13
12
14
14
53
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.1 ( -0.9
1 0.5 ( -0.6
1 1.4 ( 0.5
1 0.8 (-10.7
1 1.2 ( 0.5
1
1
2
1
5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 0.7)
, 1.5)
2.2)
, 12.2)
, 1.8)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
370210034
370210034
370210034
370210034
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
19
5
2
2
19
5
2
2
10
REGION 4
AIRS ID
370990006
370990006
370990006
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
4
2
3
4
A
.0 ( 14. 1,
.4 ( 3.5,
.6 ( 2.0,
.5 ( 1.8,
.0 ( 14. 1,
.4 ( 3.5,
.6 ( 2.0,
.5 ( 1.8,
.1 ( 8.5,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
30.
12.
3.
4.
30.
12.
3.
4.
12.
3)*
9)*
8)
0)
3)*
9)*
8)
0)
5)*
STATE=NC REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
2
1
9
2
1
9
4
REGION 4
AIRS ID
450190048
450430009
450450009
450790019
450190048
450430009
450450009
450790019
450190048
450430009
450450009
450790019
450190048
450430009
450450009
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
.0 ( 1.5,
.7 ( 1 .2,
.2 ( 6.5,
.0 ( 1.5,
.7 ( 1 .2,
.2 ( 6.5,
.9 ( 4.0,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
2.
16.
3.
2.
16.
6.
3)
6)
6)*
3)
6)
6)*
3)
STATE=SC REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
2
7
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
4
3
2
2
2
2
.5 ( 1.9,
.3 ( 5.9,
.5 ( 2.7,
.5 ( 2.9,
.3 ( 2.5,
.2 ( 3.4,
.3 ( 3.3,
.0 ( 2.5,
.5 ( 2.7,
.8 ( 3.9,
.5 ( 2.6,
.7 ( 2.2,
.6 ( 2.0,
.5 ( 2.0,
.5 ( 1.8,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
9.
5.
4.
5.
5.
6.
3.
5.
6.
5.
3.
3.
3.
4.
7)
6)
1)
5)
2)
5)
3)
9)
1)
4)
6)
5)
8)
4)
3)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
4
14
10
10
4
14
10
38
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
-0.9
-3.8
-2.2
0.5
. REL.
CONF
(-12
( -9.
( -2.
( -0.
.5
.0
.9
.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 10.7)
1.4)
, -1.5)
2.0)
ORGANIZATION 030 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
11
7
10
11
7
28
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
EST
(90%
1.2
0.3
-2.4
. REL.
CONF
( 0.
( -0.
( -9
.1
.6
.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.2)
1.2)
4.6)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
24
14
28
11
25
14
25
14
23
10
25
14
20
8
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
0.8
-3.1
-2.8
-2.0
0.9
-1.3
1.8
0.7
2.1
-2.8
1.3
1.6
-0.4
-1.0
1.5
. REL.
CONF
( -0.
( -5.
( -3.
( -2.
( -1.
( -2.
( -0.
( -0.
( 0.
( -4.
( -0.
( 0.
( -1.
( -1.
( -0.
.4
.4
.8
.9
.0
.7
.1
.4
.8
.3
.7
.8
.7
.9
.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.0)
, -0.7)
, -1.9)
, -1.1)
, 2.7)
0.1)
3.8)
, 1.7)
3.5)
, -1.4)
3.3)
2.3)
0.8)
, -0.1)
2.9)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
450510002
450790019
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
3
1
4
3
3
2
3
)0!
.3
.5
.8
.7
.7
.3
.8
REGION-4
6 CONF.
( 2.1,
( 1.2,
( 4.3,
( 3.3,
( 3.3,
( 2.0,
( 3.6,
(contl
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7.9)
2.0)
5.6)
4.3)
4.3)
2.7)
4.1)
STATE=TN REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
471130004
471631007
471650007
471130004
471631007
471650007
471130004
471631007
471650007
471130004
471631007
471650007
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90% CONF.
3
3
3
10
2
6
1
12
1
2
8
19
3
7
7
12
8
.6
.7
.4
.0
.9
.0
.8
.8
.8
.7
.0
.9
.5
.1
.7
.3
.5
REGION 4
( 2.7,
( 2.9,
( 2.8,
( 8.2,
( 2.4,
( 4.9,
( 1.5,
( 10.4,
( 1.5,
( 2.2,
( 6.6,
( 16.2,
( 3.1,
( 6.3,
( 6.8,
( 10.9,
( 8.0,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5.3)
5.1)
4.4)
12.9)*
3.9)
7.8)
2.4)
16.7)*
2.4)
3.5)
10.3)*
26.0)*
4.2)
8.2)
9.0)
14.2)*
9.2)
STATE=TN REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
471570047
471570047
471570047
471570047
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
(!
4
2
1
2
4
2
)0!
.5
.0
.7
.2
.5
.0
6 CONF.
( 3.4,
( 1.5,
( 1.4,
( 1.7,
( 3.4,
( 1.5,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.5)
2.9)
2.3)
3.2)
6.5)
2.9)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
4
23
79
75
72
69
295
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
4
4
4
5
17
EST
(90%
0.9
-0.5
. REL.
CONF
( -3.
( -1.
.5
.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
5.2)
0.0)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
19
27
27
22
27
23
25
23
26
27
25
59
76
71
78
284
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
12
EST
(90%
-2.9
-0.3
0.5
-1.9
0.7
0.5
-1.3
-2.8
-0.4
-1.9
-0.6
-0.6
. REL.
CONF
( -4.
( -1.
( -0.
( -5.
( -0.
( -1.
( -1.
( -7.
( -1.
( -2.
( -3.
( -7.
.0
.8
.6
.2
.4
.5
.8
.2
.1
.6
.2
.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.8)
, 1.2)
1.6)
, 1.4)
, 1.7)
2.5)
, -0.9)
, 1.5)
0.2)
, -1.3)
, 2.1)
6.3)
ORGANIZATION 002 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
15
22
15
14
15
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-0. 1
1. 1
-0.1
0.7
. REL.
CONF
( -2.
( 0.
( -0.
( -0.
.3
.3
.7
.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.1)
1.9)
0.6)
, 1.7)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
A
(contl
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
1 .7 ( 1.4, 2.3)
2.2 ( 1.7, 3.2)
2.7 ( 2.4, 3. 1)
REGION 4 STATE TN REPORTING
AIRS ID
470370023
470370023
470370023
470370023
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
3.0 ( 2.2, 5.0)
6.5 ( 5.0, 9.7)
17.0 ( 12.4, 27.9)*
7.8 ( 6.1, 11.3)*
3.0 ( 2.2, 5.0)
6.5 ( 5.0, 9.7)
17.0 ( 12.4, 27.9)*
7.8 ( 6.1, 11.3)*
9.5 ( 8.1, 11.5)*
REGION 4 STATE TN REPORTING
AIRS ID
470931017
470931017
470931017
470931017
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
pFp.Tr
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
1.7 ( 1.3, 2.6)
4.2 ( 3.2, 6.5)
1 .6 ( 1.1, 2.5)
2.1 ( 1.6, 3.4)
1.7 ( 1.3, 2.6)
4.2 ( 3.2, 6.5)
1.6 ( 1.1, 2.5)
2.1 ( 1.6, 3.4)
2.6 ( 2.3, 3.2)
m-A <;TATF-TW pFpnpTTwr.
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
22
15
66
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
ORGANIZATION 003 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
13
9
15
9
13
9
15
46
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.0 ( -2.0
1 -4. 1 ( -6.7
1 -6.0 (-16.4
1 2.9 ( -0.6
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.0)
, -1.5)
4.4)
6.3)
ORGANIZATION 004 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
11
10
10
12
11
10
10
43
npr.AWT7ATTni>
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.1 ( -1.0
1 1. 1 ( -1 .3
1 0.6 ( -0.3
1 1.8 ( 1.0
1
1
1
1
4
j nn^ MFTunn i is
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.8)
3.4)
1.4)
, 2.5)
AIRS ID QUARTER
470654002 1
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
3.1 ( 2.6, 4.1)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
26
1
EST. REL. BIAS
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
470654002
470654002
470654002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
2
1
3
3
2
1
3
2
)0!
.7
.6
.0
.1
.7
.6
.0
.7
REGION 5
6 CONF.
( 2.2,
( 1.3,
( 2.5,
( 2.6,
( 2.2,
( 1.3,
( 2.5,
( 2.4,
(contl
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.6)
2.1)
3.9)
4.1)
3.6)
2.1)
3.9)
3.0)
STATE=IL REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
171610003
171610003
171610003
171610003
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90% CONF.
5
5
2
3
5
5
2
3
4
.5
.8
.6
.7
.5
.8
.6
.7
.6
REGION-5
( 4.0,
( 4.3,
( 2.0,
( 2.5,
( 4.0,
( 4.3,
( 2.0,
( 2.5,
( 3.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
9.1)
9.2)
4.0)
7.6)
9.1)
9.2)
4.0)
7.6)
5.7)
STATE=IL REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
170314201
171150013
171191007
171193007
171430037
170314201
171150013
171191007
171193007
171430037
170314201
171150013
171191007
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
(!
4
9
9
4
8
9
5
5
4
6
3
14
7
)0!
.4
.2
.8
.2
.1
.2
.2
.4
.8
.1
.0
.2
.8
6 CONF.
( 3.3,
( 7.0,
( 7.3,
( 3.2,
( 6.1,
( 6.7,
( 3.9,
( 4.1,
( 3.7,
( 3.1,
( 2.1,
( 10.0,
( 5.6,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.8)
14.0)*
15.1)*
6.1)
12.0)*
15.1)*
7.7)
7.8)
7.0)
98.1)*
5.1)
25.5)*
13.4)*
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
22
30
27
26
22
30
27
105
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
-1.1
-0.0
0. 1
. REL.
CONF
( -2
( -0.
( -0.
.0
.5
.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -0.2)
0.5)
1.1)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
10
12
5
9
10
12
5
36
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
1.3
0.8
-1.6
-2.4
. REL.
CONF
( -2.
( -2.
( -2.
( -5.
.2
.7
.7
.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 4.8)
4.3)
, -0.5)
0.6)
ORGAN IZATION-001 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
12
11
14
13
9
13
14
14
1
8
7
8
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-0.8
-0.9
7.2
1.7
3.3
-4.0
-1.5
3. 1
0.6
6.1
-0.4
5.2
-1.5
. REL.
CONF
( -3.
( -5.
( 3
( -0.
( -0.
( -9
( -4.
( 1
( -1.
( -2.
( -5.
( -7.
.3
.9
.4
.2
.4
.4
.0
.0
.7
.5
.3
.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.6)
4.0)
, 11.0)
3.6)
, 7.1)
, 1.5)
, 1.0)
5.3)
3.0)
, 1.7)
, 15.7)
4.0)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
171193007
171430037
170314201
171150013
171191007
171193007
171430037
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
2.2 (
10.9 (
3.4 (
7.0 (
7.8 (
6.1 (
8.1 (
7.4 (
6.1 (
8.1 (
6.7 (
7.1 (
. REL.
CONF.
1 .6,
7.1,
2.5,
5.2,
5.9,
4.4,
6.0,
6.5,
5.2,
6.8,
5.8,
6.5,
(contl
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.4)
25.9)*
5.4)
11.1)*
12.1)*
10.0)
13.0)*
8.7)
7.3)
10.0)*
8.1)
7.7)
REGION-5 STATE-IL REPORTING
AIRS ID
170310050
170310052
170313301
170310050
170310052
170313301
170310050
170310052
170313301
170310050
170310052
170313301
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
pFp.Tr
EST
(90%
14.0 (
5.5 (
12.8 (
6.8 (
7.1 (
3.1 (
3.8 (
6.5 (
4.1 (
2.5 (
8.4 (
6.8 (
11.4 (
6.1 (
5.0 (
7.3 (
7.9 (
iw-c; <;
. REL.
CONF.
10.5,
4.1,
9.6,
5.1,
5.3,
2.2,
2.8,
4.8,
3.1,
1 .4,
6.2,
5.1,
9.5,
5.1,
4.1,
5.9,
7.2,
TATF-l
RMSE
INTERVAL)
21.7)*
8.6)
19.9)*
10.3)*
11.0)*
5.0)
6.1)
10.0)*
6.4)
10.8)*
13.4)*
10.3)*
14.4)*
7.7)
6.3)
9.6)
8.8)
w pFpnpTTwr.
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
4
10
10
11
9
10
61
51
38
50
200
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
20
EST
(90%
0.9
-9.3
-1.8
-3.3
0.7
1.0
-1.3
. REL.
CONF.
( -0.2
(-17.1
( -3.5
( -7.1
( -3.8
( -3.0
( -6.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.1)
, -1.6)
, -0.1)
0.5)
, 5.1)
4.9)
3.6)
ORGAN IZATION-003 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
11
11
12
11
9
10
11
11
2
10
12
33
32
32
24
121
npr.AWT7ATTni>
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
12
j-nn i MFTHf
EST
(90%
-0.4
-1.5
-1.7
2.4
-1.1
-0.1
2. 1
0.7
-1.7
1.4
2.4
3.5
in iis
. REL.
CONF.
( -8.4
( -4.5
( -8.9
( -1-1
( -5.1
( -2.1
( 0.2
( -3.0
( -3.8
(-11 .6
( -2.6
( 0.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
7.7)
, 1.6)
5.6)
5.8)
2.9)
, 1.9)
4.1)
4.4)
0.5)
, 14.3)
7.3)
, 6.7)
AIRS ID QUARTER
180030004 1
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
2.6 ( 2.0, 3.8)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
14
1
EST. REL. BIAS
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
-0.6 ( -1.9, 0.6)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
180431004
180891016
180950009
181411008
181570007
181630006
180030004
180431004
180891016
180950009
181411008
181570007
181630006
180030004
180431004
180891016
180950009
181411008
181570007
181630006
180030004
180431004
180891016
180950009
181411008
181570007
181630006
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
5.1
2.9
17.4
3.7
8.4
1.8
2.8
3.1
6.6
4.7
4.4
7.6
12.2
1 .6
2.2
7.9
26.4
2.3
12.6
3.0
6.3
4.8
2.3
2.3
10.1
10.5
14.6
8.0
6.7
12.3
8.5
9.0
REGION 5
6 CONF
( 3.
( 2.
( 13.
( 2.
( 6.
( 1.
( 2.
( 2.
( 5.
( 3.
( 3.
( 5.
( 9.
( 1.
( 1.
( 5.
( 20.
( 1.
( 9.
( 2.
( 4.
( 3.
( 1.
( 1.
( 7.
( 7.
( 11.
( 7.
( 6.
( 10.
( 7.
( 8.
RMSE
(contl
. INTERVAL)
7,
2,
1,
6,
4,
3,
1,
4,
0,
5,
3,
7,
3,
2,
6,
7,
0,
7,
5,
2,
7,
6,
7,
7,
7,
8,
0,
1,
0,
8,
6,
4,
8.
4.
26.
7.
12.
2.
4.
4.
9.
7.
6.
11.
18.
2.
3.
13.
40.
3.
19.
4.
9.
7.
3.
3.
15.
16.
22.
9.
7.
14.
9.
9.
1)
1)
4)*
1)
2)*
8)
2)
9)
7)
1)
6)
5)*
0)*
4)
7)
5)*
1)*
8)
0)*
6)
7)
1)
7)
6)
0)*
7)*
1)*
1)
7)
2)*
8)
6)
STATE=IN REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
181670023
181670023
181670023
181670023
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
(90!
3.6
3.8
2.6
25.8
3.6
3.8
6 CONF
( 2.
( 2.
( 2.
( 19.
( 2.
( 2.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
7,
9,
0,
9,
7,
9,
5.
5.
3.
37.
5.
5.
3)
6)
9)
7)*
3)
6)
nued)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
10 1
15 1
12 1
6 1
14 1
11 1
12 1
11 1
13 1
12 1
12 1
12 1
13 1
13 1
8 1
8 1
12 1
9 1
12 1
11 1
11 1
13 1
10 1
11 1
13 1
10 1
12 1
82 7
85 7
73 7
80 7
320 28
EST
(90%
-3
1
8
2
-1
0
0
-2
-0
3
3
-1
3
-0
-1
-1
-5
1
-0
-0
-1
-0
0
0
-2
-3
5
.4
.9
.0
.6
.1
.7
.3
.6
.4
.2
.2
.9
.8
.4
.4
.2
.6
.6
.2
.7
.3
.2
.4
.6
.3
.5
.4
. REL.
CONF.
( -5.7
( 0.9
( -0.4
( 0.2
( -5.2
( -0.3
( -1.2
( -3.6
( -3.8
( 1.4
( 1.6
( -5.9
( -2.1
( -1.2
( -2.6
( -6.8
(-19.6
( 0.6
( -7.0
( -2.4
( -4.8
( -2.7
( -1.0
( -0.7
( -7.4
( -9.5
( -1.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.1)
2.9)
, 16.4)
5.0)
3.0)
, 1.6)
1.8)
, -1.7)
2.9)
5.1)
, 4.8)
, 2.1)
9.7)
0.4)
, -0.3)
4.4)
, 8.4)
2.7)
6.6)
0.9)
2.3)
2.2)
, 1.8)
1.8)
2.8)
2.6)
, 12.7)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 119
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
13 1
13 1
13 1
14 1
13 1
13 1
EST
(90%
0
1
0
8
.7
.7
.7
.6
. REL.
CONF.
( -1.1
( -0.0
( -0.6
( -3.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.5)
3.4)
2.0)
, 20.6)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
A
(!
2
25
13
REGION 5
AIRS ID
180970081
180970083
180970081
180970083
180970081
180970083
180970081
180970083
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
)0% CONF.
.6 ( 2.0,
.8 ( 19.9,
.6 ( 11.7,
RMSE
(contl
INTERVAL)
3.
37.
16.
9)
7)*
2)*
STATE=IN REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
17
4
4
4
7
3
3
9
12
4
6
7
8
REGION-5
AIRS ID
260650012
260770008
260810020
261210040
261450018
261630001
260650012
260770008
260810020
261210040
261450018
261630001
260650012
260770008
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
.2 ( 13.0,
.1 ( 3.1,
.0 ( 3.0,
.9 ( 3.7,
.7 ( 5.9,
.5 ( 2.6,
.9 ( 2.8,
.6 ( 7.4,
.0 ( 9.8,
.4 ( 3.6,
.1 ( 4.9,
.9 ( 6.4,
.1 ( 7.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
26.
6.
5.
7.
11.
5.
6.
13.
15.
5.
7.
10.
9.
0)*
0)
8)
3)
4)*
3)
4)
7)*
6)*
7)
9)
4)*
2)
STATE=MI REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
2
2
2
2
4
8
3
3
4
3
3
5
2
2
.3 ( 1.8,
.1 ( 1.7,
.6 ( 2.0,
.0 ( 1.5,
.5 ( 3.0,
.3 ( 6.3,
.8 ( 3.0,
.3 ( 2.7,
.6 ( 3.5,
.4 ( 2.5,
.2 ( 2.4,
.5 ( 4.1,
.3 ( 1 .8,
.4 ( 1.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
2.
3.
2.
9.
12.
5.
4.
6.
5.
4.
8.
3.
3.
0)
9)
8)
9)
3)
5)*
1)
4)
8)
6)
8)
5)
2)
1)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
14
53
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
4
EST
(90%
. REL.
CONF
BIAS
INTERVAL)
ORGANIZATION 008 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
14
14
13
13
12
9
15
26
27
25
24
102
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
-0.8
1. 1
-0.3
0.3
5.7
0.3
1.6
2.7
. REL.
CONF
(-10
( -0.
( -2
( -2
( 3
( -1
( -0.
( -1.
.1
.8
.2
.2
.1
.6
.8
.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
8.5)
3.1)
1.7)
2.8)
, 8.4)
, 2.1)
3.9)
, 7.0)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
25
21
14
14
5
12
20
24
13
9
12
11
18
23
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
0.3
-0.3
0.4
-0.4
3.7
1.7
-0.9
-1.4
1.0
-0.3
-0.2
2.1
-1.4
-0.0
. REL.
CONF
( -0.
( -1.
( -0.
( -1.
( 1
( -2
( -2
( -2
( -1.
( -2
( -2
( -0.
( -2.
( -0.
.5
.1
.9
.4
.2
.7
.3
.5
.2
.5
.0
.8
.2
.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 1.1)
0.5)
, 1.6)
0.5)
6.3)
, 6.1)
0.6)
, -0.4)
3.3)
1.9)
, 1.5)
5.0)
, -0.7)
0.8)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
260810020
261210040
261450018
261630001
260650012
260770008
260810020
261210040
261450018
261630001
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
3.2 (
1.8 (
5.1 (
3.4 (
4.1 (
3.1 (
3.2 (
2.8 (
2.8 (
5.1 (
3.8 (
3.9 (
3.3 (
3.6 (
3.7 (
. REL.
CONF.
2.3,
1.3,
4.0,
2.5,
3.1,
2.5,
2.4,
2.0,
2.0,
3.9,
3.4,
3.5,
2.9,
3.2,
3.4,
RMSE
(contl
INTERVAL)
5.
3.
7.
5.
6.
4.
4.
4.
5.
7.
4.
4.
3.
4.
3.
6)
1)
1)
1)
0)
1)
8)
7)
1)
8)
3)
5)
7)
2)
9)
REGION-5 STATE-MN REPORTING
AIRS ID
270854301
270854301
270854301
271377550
271230866
271377550
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
1.7 (
1.1 (
15.7 (
9.1 (
20.2 (
10.0 (
1.7 (
1.1 (
13.1 (
14.2 (
11 .8 (
. REL.
CONF.
1 .0,
0.7,
10.8,
6. 1,
10.3,
5.8,
1 .0,
0.7,
9.8,
8.8,
9.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7.
5.
30.
19.
322.
44.
7.
5.
20.
41.
16.
4)
0)
0)*
1)*
2)*
2)*
4)
0)
3)*
6)*
3)*
REGION-5 STATE-MN REPORTING
AIRS ID
270530960
271230866
271230868
271377550
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
0.4 (
11.7 (
12.2 (
7.7 (
. REL.
CONF.
0.2,
8.8,
9.3,
5.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.
17.
18.
14.
7)
7)*
1)*
7)*
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
8
8
17
12
14
23
12
8
7
12
91
89
86
76
342
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
24
EST
(90%
0.7
1.1
2.0
1.2
2.5
1.9
-2.7
1.5
1.7
1.7
. REL.
CONF.
( -1.
( o.
( o.
( -o.
( 1.
( 1.
( -3.
( -o.
( -o.
( -o.
5
1
0
5
0
0
6
1
1
9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.0)
2.2)
4.1)
2.9)
, 4.1)
2.8)
, -1.8)
3.2)
3.5)
4.3)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 119
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
2
2
6
5
1
2
2
2
11
3
18
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
6
EST
(90%
-0.7
-1.1
0.8
-3.9
20.2
10.0
. REL.
CONF.
(-10.
( -2.
(-13.
(-12.
( 7.
2
3
3
7
8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
8.8)
0.0)
, 14.9)
4.8)
, 12.2)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
1
12
13
6
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-0.4
10.0
3.8
3.3
. REL.
CONF.
( 6.
( -2.
( -3.
7
1
0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 13.3)
9.8)
9.5)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
271230866
271230868
271377550
271230866
271230868
271377550
271230866
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
19
61
32
1
8
7
20
11
37
6
20
18
)0!
.7
.8
.8
.1
.1
.6
.8
.1
.1
.8
.8
.3
REGION-5
6 CONF
( 12.
( 35.
( 20.
( o.
( 5.
( 3.
( 12.
( 9.
( 27.
( 5.
( 12.
( 15.
(contl
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
8,
7,
3,
7,
6,
9,
0,
2,
1,
0,
0,
8,
46
272
95
3
15
120
92
14
61
10
92
21
STATE=OH
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
390490025
390490025
390490025
390490025
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
3
3
1
9
3
3
1
9
5
)0!
.9
.9
.9
.6
.9
.9
.9
.6
.6
REGION 5
6 CONF
( 2.
( 3.
( 1.
( 7.
( 2.
( 3.
( 1.
( 7.
( 4.
.7)*
.8)*
.7)*
•2)
.6)*
.5)*
.0)*
.0)*
.1)*
.8)*
.0)*
.8)*
REPORTING
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
9,
0,
4,
2,
9,
0,
4,
2,
8,
6
6
2
14
6
6
2
14
6
STATE=OH
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
390932003
A
QUARTER
4
4
(!
0
0
)0!
.6
.6
6 CONF
( o.
( o.
•2)
.0)
.9)
.9)*
•2)
.0)
.9)
.9)*
.8)
REPORTING
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
3,
3,
1
1
.6)
.6)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
4
2
3
3
6
1
2
32
9
10
2
53
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 8.8 (-15.2
1 43.7 ( -232
1 -14.0 (-75.2
1 -0. 1 ( -2.4
1 4.7 ( -1.3
1 7.6
1 -9. 1 ( -127
4
3
3
1
11
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 32 . 7)
, 319.6)
, 47.3)
2.2)
, 10.7)
, 109.2)
ORGAN IZATION-001 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
12
12
11
10
12
12
11
45
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 2.3 ( 0.4
1 1.5 ( -0.4
1 -0.3 ( -1.4
1 2.9 ( -2.4
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.2)
3.5)
, 0.7)
8.1)
ORGANIZATION 002 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
3
3
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.4 ( -1.2
1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.3)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
390811001
390811001
390811001
390811001
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
7.1 ( 4.8,
4.3 ( 3.2,
3.9 ( 2.8,
4.2 ( 3.0,
7.1 ( 4.8,
4.3 ( 3.2,
3.9 ( 2.8,
4.2 ( 3.0,
4.7 ( 3.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
14.9)*
6.7)
6.7)
6.8)
14.9)*
6.7)
6.7)
6.8)
5.9)
REGION 5 STATE OH REPORTING
AIRS ID
391530017
391530017
391530017
391530017
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
3.4 ( 2.5,
4.1 ( 3.0,
3.9 ( 2.9,
31.5 ( 23.0,
3.4 ( 2.5,
4.1 ( 3.0,
3.9 ( 2.9,
31 .5 ( 23.0,
15.3 ( 13.0,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5.6)
6.5)
5.9)
51.8)*
5.6)
6.5)
5.9)
51.8)*
18.8)*
REGION-5 STATE-OH REPORTING
AIRS ID
391510017
391510017
391510017
391510017
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
24.8 ( 19. 1,
2.5 ( 1.9,
3.7 ( 2.8,
1 .3 ( 1 .0,
24.8 ( 19.1,
2.5 ( 1.9,
3.7 ( 2.8,
1 .3 ( 1 .0,
13.0 ( 11 .2,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
36.2)*
3.6)
5.6)
2.0)
36.2)*
3.6)
5.6)
2.0)
15.4)*
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
5
11
8
9
5
11
8
9
33
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -6.4 ( -9.7
1 0. 1 ( -2.4
1 -0.2 ( -3.0
1 -2.7 ( -4.8
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -3.0)
2.5)
2.6)
, -0.6)
ORGANIZATION 006 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
10
12
9
9
10
12
9
40
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 1.9 ( 0.1
1 -0.3 ( -2.8
1 2.3 ( 0.5
1 5.0 (-15.4
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.8)
2.2)
4.0)
, 25.5)
ORGANIZATION-007 METHOD-120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
14
12
13
14
14
12
13
53
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -3.6 (-15.7
1 1.5 ( 0.6
1 1.4 ( -0.5
1 1.0 ( 0.5
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
8.4)
, 2.5)
3.3)
1.5)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
390170003
390610014
390610041
390170003
390610014
390610041
390170003
390610014
390610041
390170003
390610014
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
5
4
8
3
2
1
5
2
1
1
3
5
2
3
2
4
REGION-5
AIRS ID
390350060
390350060
390350038
390350060
390350038
390350060
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
5
2
3
20
5
2
5
2
15
3
9
REGION-5
AIRS ID
391130014
391130014
391130014
A
QUARTER
2
3
4
2
.8 ( 4.5,
.5 ( 3.5,
.0 ( 5.4,
.5 ( 2.7,
.5 ( 1.9,
.5 ( 1.1,
.0 ( 3.7,
.9 ( 2.2,
.7 ( 1.3,
.7 ( 1.2,
.3 ( 2.5,
.8 ( 4.8,
.8 ( 2.3,
.5 ( 2.9,
.8 ( 2.2,
.0 ( 3.6,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
8.
6.
16.
5.
3.
2.
7.
4.
2.
2.
4.
7.
3.
4.
3.
4.
7)
7)
8)*
1)
8)
4)
7)
4)
9)
9)
9)
3)
5)
4)
8)
4)
STATE=OH REPORTING
EST. REL.
)0% CONF.
.5 ( 4.3,
.2 ( 1.6,
.1 ( 2.3,
.0 ( 15.3,
.0 ( 3.7,
.0 ( 1.5,
.5 ( 4.3,
.2 ( 1.6,
.5 ( 12.5,
.8 ( 3.1,
.5 ( 8.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
8.
3.
5.
29.
8.
3.
8.
3.
20.
5.
11.
1)
4)
1)
7)*
0)
2)
1)
4)
7)*
2)
1)*
STATE=OH REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
14
1
3
14
.0 ( 10.9,
.5 ( 1.1,
.0 ( 2.2,
.0 ( 10.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
20.
2.
4.
20.
2)*
3)
7)
2)*
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
13
5
14
12
9
11
12
9
8
13
31
35
32
21
119
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
11
EST
(90%
-3.6
-1.3
-2.1
2.0
1.0
0.7
-0.9
0. 1
0.9
0.6
-0.8
. REL.
CONF
( -6.
( -3.
(-10
( 0.
( -0.
( -0.
( -3.
( -1.
( -0.
( -0.
( -2.
.0
.5
.4
.6
.2
.2
.7
.5
.0
.6
.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.3)
1.0)
, 6.1)
3.4)
2.2)
, 1.5)
, 1.8)
1.6)
, 1.9)
, 1.7)
0.9)
ORGAN IZATION-009 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
11
9
13
10
10
14
11
22
20
67
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
6
EST
(90%
3.0
-0.9
1.3
7.5
1.4
1.4
. REL.
CONF
( 0.
( -2.
( -0.
( -2.
( -1.
( 0.
.7
.0
.6
.0
.6
.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
5.3)
0.3)
, 3.1)
, 17.1)
4.3)
2.3)
ORGAN IZATION-0 10 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
15
12
10
15
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-2.8
-0.3
-1.6
. REL.
CONF
( -9
( -1.
( -3.
.3
.1
.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.6)
0.4)
, -0.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
A
(contl
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
1 .5 ( 1.1, 2.3)
3.0 ( 2.2, 4.7)
9.1 ( 7.7, 11.3)*
REGION 5 STATE OH REPORTING
AIRS ID
390851001
390851001
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
10.7 ( 7.2, 22.4)*
4.8 ( 3.7, 7.3)
10.7 ( 7.2, 22.4)*
4.8 ( 3.7, 7.3)
7.1 ( 5.6, 9.9)
REGION 5 STATE OH REPORTING
AIRS ID
391450013
391450013
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
10.4 ( 6.8, 24.7)*
20.3 ( 14.8, 33.4)*
10.4 ( 6.8, 24.7)*
20.3 ( 14.8, 33.4)*
17.9 ( 13.6, 26.6)*
REGION 5 STATE OH REPORTING
AIRS ID
390950024
390950024
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
19.7 ( 14.4, 32.4)*
4.5 ( 3.0, 9.5)
19.7 ( 14.4, 32.4)*
4.5 ( 3.0, 9.5)
16.0 ( 12.3, 23.4)*
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
10
37
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1
1
3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
ORGANIZATION 012 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
5
12
5
12
17
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 3.0 ( -8.0
1 0.7 ( -1 .9
1
1
2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 14.0)
3.3)
ORGANIZATION 013 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
4
9
4
9
13
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 4. 1 ( -8.9
1 -8.3 (-20.5
1
1
2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 17.1)
3.9)
ORGANIZATION 015 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
5
9
5
14
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 4.9 ( -7.7
1 -1.0 ( -5.7
1
1
2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 17.4)
, 3.7)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
390990005
390990005
390990005
390990005
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
2
3
2
4
2
3
2
4
3
REGION 5
AIRS ID
551091002
551091002
551091002
551091002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
.0 ( 1 .5,
.1 ( 2.4,
.7 ( 2.1,
.8 ( 3.6,
.0 ( 1 .5,
.1 ( 2.4,
.7 ( 2.1,
.8 ( 3.6,
.2 ( 2.8,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
4.
4.
7.
3.
4.
4.
7.
3.
0)
5)
0)
4)
0)
5)
0)
4)
9)
STATE=WI REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
4
6
7
9
4
6
7
9
7
REGION-5
AIRS ID
550090005
550250025
550310025
550790026
550790059
551330027
550090005
550250025
550310025
550790026
550790059
551330027
550090005
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
(!
6
14
6
18
7
3
18
11
5
9
8
4
2
.2 ( 3.0,
.2 ( 3.6,
.2 ( 5.1,
.4 ( 6.8,
.2 ( 3.0,
.2 ( 3.6,
.2 ( 5.1,
.4 ( 6.8,
.2 ( 5.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7.
27.
13.
16.
7.
27.
13.
16.
9.
1)
4)*
0)*
1)*
1)
4)*
0)*
1)*
4)
STATE=WI REPORTING
EST. REL.
)0% CONF.
.3 ( 4.8,
.5 ( 10.6,
.0 ( 4.8,
.3 ( 14.0,
.8 ( 6.0,
.6 ( 2.8,
.4 ( 14.0,
.1 ( 8.7,
.0 ( 3.5,
.4 ( 7.2,
.9 ( 6.8,
.4 ( 3.4,
.3 ( 1.8,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
9.
23.
8.
27.
11.
5.
27.
15.
9.
14.
13.
6.
3.
3)
9)*
0)
2)*
4)*
2)
4)*
8)*
0)
0)*
3)*
6)
2)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
14
13
11
12
14
13
11
50
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
0.4
0.3
1.6
2. 1
. REL.
CONF
( -0.
( -1.
( 0.
( -0.
.6
.2
.5
.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.4)
1.8)
2.8)
4.5)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
8
2
7
8
8
2
7
8
25
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
2.0
-3.7
-0.0
-1.1
. REL.
CONF
( -0.
(-35
( -5.
( -7.
.7
.1
.8
.8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.6)
, 27.7)
, 5.7)
5.6)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
9
22
13
14
15
13
16
7
13
13
13
17
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-2.5
4.7
-1.4
5.4
6.1
-1.0
-2.5
-4.4
0. 1
5.7
4.9
-0.4
0.4
. REL.
CONF
( -5.
( -4.
( -3.
( -3.
( 3
( -2
(-11
( -9.
( -3.
( 1
( 1
( -2.
( -0.
.4
.3
.6
.6
.6
.6
.9
.0
.9
.8
.0
.7
.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.5)
, 13.7)
0.8)
, 14.4)
8.5)
, 0.7)
6.9)
0.3)
4.1)
9.5)
, 8.7)
1.9)
, 1.4)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
550250025
550310025
550790026
550790059
551330027
550090005
550250025
550310025
550790026
550790059
551330027
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
4.2
3.7
4.3
2.3
3.4
13.8
5.0
7.2
5.1
5.3
5.4
10.0
11 .0
3.5
7.5
8.5
REGION 6
6 CONF
( 3.
( 2.
( 3.
( 1.
( 2.
( 10.
( 4.
( 5.
( 3.
( 3.
( 4.
( 8.
( 9.
( 3.
( 6.
( 8.
RMSE
(contl
. INTERVAL)
3,
9,
2,
7,
5,
3,
0,
2,
7,
9,
2,
9,
7,
1,
6,
0,
5.
5.
6.
3.
5.
21.
6.
11.
8.
8.
8.
11.
12.
4.
8.
9.
7)
1)
9)
8)
5)
4)*
8)
8)*
7)
7)
1)
5)*
7)*
0)
7)
1)
STATE=AR REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
050010001
050310001
050010001
050310001
050450002
050010001
050310001
050450002
050310001
050450002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
5.8
4.6
6.3
7.3
7.8
1 .8
1 .6
8.7
4.4
4.5
5.4
7.1
5.4
4.4
5.7
6 CONF
( 4.
( 3.
( 4.
( 5.
( 5.
( 1.
( 1.
( 6.
( 3.
( 3.
( 4.
( 5.
( 4.
( 3.
( 5.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
6,
4,
8,
3,
8,
3,
2,
7,
3,
4,
4,
9,
6,
6,
2,
8.
7.
9.
12.
12.
2.
2.
12.
6.
6.
7.
8.
6.
5.
6.
3)
3)
3)
0)*
4)*
9)
3)
7)*
7)
7)
0)
9)
7)
8)
4)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
20
18
10
9
9
11
19
9
8
9
13
86
75
83
69
313
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
24
EST
(90%
0.5
-0.4
0.7
-0.0
1.2
6.6
-0.8
2.2
4.0
2.3
0.5
. REL.
CONF.
( -1.1
( -1.9
( -1.9
( -1.6
( -0.9
( -0.3
( -2.8
( -2.3
( 1.7
( -0.8
( -2.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.1)
, 1.1)
3.3)
1.5)
3.3)
, 13.6)
1.2)
, 6.7)
6.3)
5.4)
3.3)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
16
10
13
9
10
10
14
14
12
12
26
32
38
24
120
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
2
10
EST
(90%
-2.2
-0.8
-1.4
0.6
-0.4
1.2
-0.8
3.0
1.9
-0.4
. REL.
CONF.
( -4.7
( -3.6
( -4.5
( -4.2
( -5.2
( 0.4
( -1.5
( -1.0
( -0.3
( -2.8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.2)
2.0)
1.7)
5.4)
4.4)
2.0)
, -0.2)
, 7.0)
4.0)
2.0)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
051190007
051191008
051310008
051190007
051191008
051310008
050010010
051190007
051191008
051310008
050010010
051190007
051191008
051310008
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
2.2 (
6.4 (
4.6 (
6.5 (
5.7 (
6.6 (
5.2 (
1.6 (
6.1 (
11.7 (
6.7 (
2.8 (
3.6 (
3.3 (
4.9 (
6.3 (
7.6 (
4.1 (
6.0 (
. REL.
CONF
1 .
4.
3.
5.
4.
5.
3.
1 .
4.
9.
4.
2.
2.
2.
4.
5.
6.
3.
5.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
5,
7,
5,
0,
2,
0,
2,
2,
7,
0,
7,
1,
7,
4,
0,
3,
5,
4,
5,
4
10
6
9
9
10
15
2
9
17
12
4
5
5
6
7
9
5
6
REGION-6 STATE-LA
AIRS ID
220171002
220330009
220550005
220710012
220171002
220330009
220550005
220710012
220171002
220330009
220550005
220710012
220171002
220330009
220550005
220710012
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
EST
(90%
3.5 (
14.0 (
5.4 (
4.9 (
13.4 (
2.6 (
3.1 (
19.2 (
3.2 (
5.3 (
3.6 (
4.2 (
3.7 (
1.9 (
3.5 (
4.4 (
8.4 (
12.5 (
4.2 (
3.5 (
. REL.
CONF
2.
10.
4.
3.
10.
2.
2.
14.
2.
4.
2.
3.
2.
1 .
2.
3.
7.
10.
3.
3.
.3)
.5)*
.8)
.3)
•2)
.0)
.2)*
.3)
.1)
.1)*
.0)*
.3)
.5)
•2)
.3)
.8)
.2)
.0)
.6)
REPORTING
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
7,
9,
1,
7,
3,
0,
2,
9,
4,
0,
7,
2,
9,
5,
7,
3,
2,
8,
6,
0,
5
20
8
7
20
3
5
27
5
8
5
6
5
2
5
6
10
14
5
4
.0)
.2)*
.0)
.6)
.0)*
.7)
.0)
.6)*
.0)
.0)
•4)
.3)
.5)
.8)
•1)
.5)
.0)
.9)*
.0)
.1)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
6 1
9 1
13 1
15 1
10 1
12 1
3 1
14 1
13 1
14 1
7 1
11 1
12 1
10 1
28 3
37 3
44 4
40 4
149 14
EST
(90%
-1
1
1
3
0
-2
4
0
-2
0
-2
-0
0
1
. 1
.0
.0
.8
.6
.4
.7
.2
.8
.0
. 1
.8
.2
.4
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.8
( -3.2
( -1.3
( 1.3
( -2.9
( -5.7
( -0.1
( -0.6
( -5.6
( -5.8
( -7.1
( -2.3
( -1.7
( -0.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.7)
5.1)
3.3)
6.3)
4.1)
0.9)
9.5)
0.9)
0.0)
5.8)
3.0)
0.8)
2.2)
3.2)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
15 1
15 1
13 1
11 1
13 1
15 1
9 1
15 1
11 1
12 1
12 1
12 1
14 1
15 1
14 1
13 1
54 4
52 4
47 4
56 4
EST
(90%
0
0
-1
3
-2
0
0
9
1
2
0
3
0
0
-1
2
.3
.5
.9
.6
.2
.7
.9
.5
.2
.6
. 1
.3
.2
.2
.3
.7
. REL.
CONF.
( -1.3
( -6.1
( -4.5
( 1.6
( -9.0
( -0.4
( -1.0
( 1.6
( -0.5
( 0.1
( -1.8
( 1.9
( -1.6
( -0.7
( -2.9
( 1.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.9)
7.1)
0.6)
5.5)
4.7)
, 1.9)
2.8)
, 17.4)
2.9)
, 5.1)
2.1)
, 4.7)
, 2.1)
, 1.1)
0.3)
4.5)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3 35
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
REGION=6 STATE=LA REPORTING ORGANIZATION=001 METHOD=118
(continued)
NO. OF
EST. REL. RMSE NO. OF SAMPLER EST. REL. BIAS
AIRS ID QUARTER (90% CONF. INTERVAL) OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS (90% CONF. INTERVAL)
i.O ( 7.4, 8.7)
209
16
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
350450006
350490020
350450006
350490020
350450006
350490020
350450006
350490020
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
2.8
3.8
3.2
0.4
2.6
3.6
4.5
3.4
3.0
2.8
3.4
4.0
3.5
REGION-6
6 CONF
( 2.
( 2.
( 2.
( o.
( 1.
( 2.
( 3.
( 2.
( 2.
( 2.
( 2.
( 3.
( 3.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
1,
3,
2,
2,
6,
6,
4,
5,
3,
0,
6,
2,
0,
4
11
5
1
7
5
6
5
4
4
5
5
4
STATE=NM
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
350010023
350010023
350010023
350010023
350010024
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
2.3
4.1
7.3
3.5
3.6
2.3
4.1
7.3
3.5
4.1
6 CONF
( 1.
( 3.
( 5.
( 3.
( 2.
( 1.
( 3.
( 5.
( 3.
( 3.
•2)
.0)*
.7)
.8)
.6)
.9)
.6)
.1)
.3)
.6)
.1)
•2)
.1)
REPORTING
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
9,
1,
6,
0,
1,
9,
1,
6,
0,
7,
3
6
10
4
15
3
6
10
4
4
.0)
.0)
.8)*
•4)
.7)*
.0)
.0)
.8)*
.4)
.7)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
13 1
3 1
7 1
2 1
3 1
9 1
13 1
12 1
16 2
9 2
12 2
25 2
62 8
EST
(90%
1
-3
-1
0
2
-0
-3
0
.4
.3
.2
.0
.3
.4
.0
.4
. REL.
CONF.
( 0.1
( -6.9
( -3.5
( -2.5
( -0.1
( -2.7
( -4.7
( -1.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.6)
0.2)
, 1.1)
2.6)
4.8)
2.0)
, -1.2)
2.2)
ORGAN IZATION-002 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
26 1
14 1
13 1
35 1
2 1
26 1
14 1
13 1
37 2
90 5
EST
(90%
1
-1
-2
0
-3
.2
.1
.0
.8
.6
. REL.
CONF.
( 0.5
( -3.0
( -5.6
( -0.2
( -4.8
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.8)
0.9)
, 1.6)
1.8)
, -2.3)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
350439003
350439003
350439003
350439003
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
5
0
2
2
5
0
2
2
3
REGION 6
AIRS ID
350439004
350439004
350439004
350439004
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
.4 ( 3.7,
.8 ( 0.5,
.0 ( 1.3,
.9 ( 2.2,
.4 ( 3.7,
.8 ( 0.5,
.0 ( 1.3,
.9 ( 2.2,
.5 ( 2.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
10.
3.
4.
4.
10.
3.
4.
4.
4.
3)*
5)
8)
7)
3)*
5)
8)
7)
7)
STATE=NM REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
4
6
6
5
4
6
6
5
5
REGION-6
AIRS ID
400310648
400470554
401090035
401430110
400310648
400470554
401090035
401430110
400310648
400470554
401090035
401430110
400310648
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
(!
4
1
4
1
2
4
3
5
3
4
3
6
2
.4 ( 3.4,
.5 ( 4.6,
.8 ( 4.7,
.8 ( 4.4,
.4 ( 3.4,
.5 ( 4.6,
.8 ( 4.7,
.8 ( 4.4,
.7 ( 4.8,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.
11.
13.
9.
6.
11.
13.
9.
7.
4)
7)*
0)*
1)
4)
7)*
0)*
1)
0)
STATE=OK REPORTING
EST. REL.
)0% CONF.
.7 ( 3.5,
.9 ( 1.4,
.2 ( 3.1,
.8 ( 1 .4,
.0 ( 1.5,
.9 ( 3.6,
.8 ( 2.8,
.3 ( 3.7,
.9 ( 2.9,
.8 ( 3.5,
.6 ( 2.7,
.0 ( 4.5,
.4 ( 1.7,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7.
3.
6.
2.
3.
7.
6.
10.
6.
7.
5.
9.
4.
3)
5)
3)
7)
1)
5)
3)
2)*
2)
8)
8)
4)
3)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
6
2
4
10
6
2
4
10
22
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
-3.7
0.6
0.9
-1.7
. REL.
CONF
( -7
( -3.
( -1.
( -3.
.2
.0
.6
.2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -0.1)
4.1)
3.3)
, -0.2)
ORGANIZATION 007 METHOD 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
7
6
11
14
7
6
11
38
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
0.2
2.8
2.4
0.8
. REL.
CONF
( -2.
( -1.
( -3.
( -2.
.0
.8
.4
.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.3)
7.5)
, 8.1)
, 4.1)
ORGAN IZATI ON- 1 0 1 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
7
12
13
11
11
9
6
10
9
10
11
7
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
2.2
1.1
0.0
1. 1
0.8
-0.3
2.1
-0.3
1.6
-0.8
2.2
-1.4
-0.2
. REL.
CONF
( -0.
( -0.
( -2.
( 0.
( -0.
( -3.
( 0.
( -5.
( -0.
( -3.
( 0.
( -4.
( -2.
.1
.1
.2
.4
.2
.1
.0
.1
.6
.8
.4
.8
.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.6)
, 2.4)
2.3)
1.9)
, 1.9)
, 2.4)
, 4.2)
4.5)
3.7)
2.3)
3.9)
1.9)
, 1.7)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
400470554
401090035
401430110
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
3
7
4
3
4
4
5
4
)0!
.9
.3
.5
.5
.1
.7
.0
.3
REGION 6
6 CONF.
( 2.8,
( 5.4,
( 3.4,
( 3.0,
( 3.4,
( 4.0,
( 4.2,
( 4.0,
(contl
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.4)
11.7)*
7.0)
4.2)
5.0)
5.8)
6.2)
4.8)
STATE=OK REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
400219002
400719003
400219002
400719003
400219002
400719003
400219002
400719003
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90% CONF.
3
31
2
3
1
2
1
4
20
3
2
3
9
.7
.5
.3
.9
.8
.5
.3
.8
.8
.5
.3
.1
.9
REGION 6
( 2.6,
( 21 .8,
( 1.6,
( 3.0,
( 1.2,
( 1.9,
( 1.0,
( 3.3,
( 16.0,
( 2.8,
( 1.8,
( 2.4,
( 8.7,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.3)
60.4)*
4.5)
6.0)
3.9)
3.6)
2.1)
9.2)
30.4)*
4.8)
3.2)
4.4)
11.5)*
STATE=TX REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
481130050
481130069
481410010
481410044
482011035
482450021
484391002
484393006
484530020
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(!
2
1
1
11
4
0
8
3
11
)0!
.3
.7
.1
.9
.6
.7
.3
.7
.7
6 CONF.
( 1.5,
( 1.3,
( 0.6,
( 8.4,
( 3.3,
( 0.3,
( 6.2,
( 2.8,
( 8.5,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5.5)
2.7)
18.3)*
21.5)*
8.3)
10.5)*
12.8)*
5.8)
19.3)*
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
10
11
43
37
40
37
157
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
16
EST
(90%
-0.4
2.5
-1.5
. REL.
CONF
( -3.
( -1.
( -3.
.0
.8
.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.1)
, 6.7)
0.9)
ORGANIZATION 106 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
8
6
6
12
5
14
10
6
14
18
19
16
67
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
0.3
-6.4
-0.0
-2.4
-1.2
-0.1
-1.0
-2.4
. REL.
CONF
( -2.
(-34
( -2.
( -4.
( -2.
( -1.
( -1.
( -6.
.3
.2
.1
.1
.7
.4
.5
.2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.0)
, 21.4)
, 2.1)
, -0.7)
0.3)
, 1.1)
, -0.5)
1.3)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
4
11
1
7
7
1
11
11
9
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-1.6
-0.0
1.1
-0. 1
2.7
-0.7
-0.6
1.9
2.8
. REL.
CONF
( -3.
( -1.
( -9.
( -0.
( -5.
( 0.
( -4.
.9
.0
.6
.3
.3
.1
.7
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 0.7)
, 1.0)
9.4)
5.7)
, 4.1)
3.7)
, 10.3)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
480290060
481130050
481130069
481410010
481410044
482010024
482011035
482450021
483550032
484391002
484393006
484530020
480290060
481130050
481130069
481410044
481671005
482010024
482011035
482450021
483550032
484391002
484393006
484530020
480290060
481130050
481130069
481410044
481671005
482011035
482450021
483550032
484391002
484393006
484530020
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(continued)
RMSE NO. OF
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
0.6
2.5
2.8
6.7
10.7
3.4
4.1
1.7
5.1
2.9
4.4
1.6
5.6
3.2
3.1
7.8
6.7
0.5
2.7
21.1
3.1
3.4
2.4
4.1
4.6
4.0
2.5
3.9
3.1
2.1
16.4
2.6
2.5
2.9
7.4
7.3
4.9
7.5
5.6
6.5
( o
( 1
( 2
( 3
( 7
( 1
( 2
( 1
( 3
( 2
( 3
( 1
( 3
( 2
( 2
( 5
( 4
( o
( 2
( 15
( 2
( 2
( 1
( 3
( 3
( 3
( 1
( 2
( 2
( 1
( 11
( 1
( 1
( 2
( 4
( 6
( 4
( 6
( 5
( 6
.4,
.9,
. 1,
.9,
.9,
.7,
.8,
. 1,
.5,
.2,
.3,
.2,
.9,
.4,
.4,
.7,
.2,
.3,
.0,
.8,
. 1,
.6,
.8,
.2,
.0,
.0,
.9,
.9,
.2,
.5,
.6,
.8,
.9,
.2,
.6,
.4,
.3,
.8,
.0,
. 1,
2
3
4
29
17
53
8
5
10
4
6
2
10
4
4
12
19
2
4
32
5
5
3
6
10
6
3
6
5
3
29
4
4
4
21
8
5
8
6
6
.9)
.9)
.2)
.5)*
.0)*
.4)*
.6)
.0)
.7)*
.4)
.5)
.7)
.0)
.6)
.4)
.4)*
.6)*
.3)
.2)
.7)*
.9)
.1)
.5)
.0)
.9)*
.4)
.8)
.0)
.6)
.4)
.5)*
.6)
.0)
.3)
.5)*
.6)
.6)
.5)
.3)
.9)
OBSERVATIONS
2
11
12
2
10
1
5
3
5
12
13
9
7
14
15
10
3
2
10
11
6
12
14
14
4
10
11
11
7
9
7
7
10
13
3
62
85
118
92
357
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL. BIAS
QUARTERS (90%
1 -0
1 1
1 0
1 5
1 -7
1 3
1 -1
1 0
1 -1
1 -0
1 -0
1 -0
1 -2
1 1
1 0
1 -0
1 6
1 -0
1 -1
1 12
1 2
1 1
1 1
1 -1
1 2
1 3
1 -0
1 2
1 1
1 -0
1 2
1 0
1 -1
1 -0
1 -5
9
12
12
11
44
.6
.7
.7
.8
.6
.4
.6
.4
.6
.5
.7
.9
.6
. 1
.7
.1
.6
.4
.0
.2
.5
.2
.3
.8
.9
.5
.4
. 1
.6
.4
.8
.4
.0
. 1
.3
CONF. INTERVAL)
( -1.6,
( 0.7,
( -0.8,
(-15.7,
(-12.2,
( -5.7,
( -3.1,
( -6.8,
( -2.0,
( -2.9,
( -1.8,
( -6.5,
( -0.3,
( -0.7,
( -4.9,
( 3.6,
( -2.7,
( -2.5,
( 2.3,
( 0.8,
( -0.5,
( 0.3,
( -3.6,
( -1.9,
( 2.3,
( -1.8,
( 0.2,
( -0.6,
( -1.7,
(-10.0,
( -1.6,
( -2.4,
( -1.6,
(-15.9,
0.3)
2.8)
2.1)
27.2)
-3.0)
2.4)
3.8)
3.6)
1.0)
1.5)
0.1)
1.2)
2.6)
2.1)
4.6)
9.5)
2.0)
0.5)
22.0)
4.1)
2.9)
2.3)
0.1)
7.8)
4.7)
1.1)
4.0)
3.7)
0.9)
15.7)
2.4)
0.5)
1.4)
5.3)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
191532520
191532520
191532520
191532520
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
2
2
3
7
2
2
3
7
4
REGION 7
AIRS ID
191130037
191130037
191130037
191130037
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
.6 ( 2.0,
.3 ( 1.7,
.6 ( 2.8,
.2 ( 5.6,
.6 ( 2.0,
.3 ( 1.7,
.6 ( 2.8,
.2 ( 5.6,
.4 ( 3.8,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
3.
5.
10.
3.
3.
5.
10.
5.
7)
4)
1)
4)*
7)
4)
1)
4)*
2)
STATE=IA REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
6
3
3
2
6
3
3
2
4
REGION-7
AIRS ID
190450021
191550009
191630015
190450021
191550009
191630015
190450021
191550009
191630015
190450021
191550009
191630015
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
(!
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
4
5
2
2
.5 ( 4.8,
.1 ( 2.3,
.1 ( 2.4,
.6 ( 2.0,
.5 ( 4.8,
.1 ( 2.3,
.1 ( 2.4,
.6 ( 2.0,
.0 ( 3.5,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
10.
5.
4.
3.
10.
5.
4.
3.
4.
1)*
0)
6)
9)
1)*
0)
6)
9)
9)
STATE=IA REPORTING
EST. REL.
)0% CONF.
.3 ( 1 .9,
.4 ( 1.9,
.7 ( 2.1,
.5 ( 1.9,
.8 ( 2.9,
.5 ( 1.9,
.8 ( 1.4,
.7 ( 2.2,
.2 ( 1.8,
.6 ( 3.7,
.8 ( 4.5,
.6 ( 2.0,
.5 ( 2.1,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
3.
3.
3.
5.
3.
2.
3.
3.
6.
8.
3.
2.
1)
3)
7)
4)
3)
6)
4)
6)
1)
3)
5)
7)
9)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
15
13
15
15
15
13
15
15
58
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
1.3
0.4
1.0
0.8
. REL.
CONF
( o
( -0.
( -0.
( -2.
.2
.7
.6
.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.4)
1.6)
2.6)
4.1)
ORGANIZATION 002 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
10
14
13
11
10
14
13
48
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
2.9
1.5
1.1
-0.2
. REL.
CONF
( -0.
( -0.
( -0.
( -1.
.4
.2
.4
.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
6.2)
3.2)
, 2.5)
, 1.1)
ORGAN IZATION-003 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
22
18
18
18
16
15
21
23
19
21
14
15
58
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
EST
(90%
1.0
-1.2
-0.2
1.0
2.8
-1.2
-0.5
-0.5
0.5
-2.4
0.8
-0.7
. REL.
CONF
( 0.
( -2.
( -1.
( 0.
( 1
( -2.
( -1.
( -1.
( -0.
( -4.
( -2.
( -1.
.3
.0
.3
.1
.6
.2
.1
.4
.4
.0
.1
.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.8)
, -0.3)
0.9)
2.0)
3.9)
, -0.2)
0.2)
0.5)
1.4)
, -0.9)
3.6)
0.4)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
(continued)
AIRS ID
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
3.0 (
2.3 (
4.5 (
3.1 (
. REL.
CONF.
2.5,
2.0,
3.9,
2.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.6)
2.7)
5.4)
3.4)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
49
63
50
220
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
3
3
3
12
EST. REL. BIAS
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
REGION=7 STATE=KS REPORTING ORGANIZATION=001 METHOD=118
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
EST. REL. BIAS
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
200910007
201070002
201730010
202090021
200910007
201070002
201730010
202090021
200910007
201070002
201730010
202090021
200910007
201070002
201730010
202090021
A
A
A
A
A
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
2.5
4.2
6.7
4.1
4.5
4.1
5.4
2.8
3.8
6.6
3.6
6.3
2.3
1.9
9.6
2.1
4.5
4.3
5.2
5.1
4.8
REGION 7
( 1.
( 3.
( 5.
( 3.
( 3.
( 3.
( 4.
( 2.
( 2.
( 4.
( 2.
( 4.
( 1.
( 1.
( 7.
( 1.
( 3.
( 3.
( 4.
( 4.
( 4.
9,
2,
1,
1,
4,
0,
1,
1,
8,
6,
8,
9,
8,
4,
2,
5,
9,
6,
4,
4,
4,
3.
6.
10.
5.
6.
6.
8.
4.
6.
11.
5.
9.
3.
3.
14.
3.
5.
5.
6.
6.
5.
6)
2)
2)*
9)
8)
5)
2)
1)
3)
8)*
2)
0)
5)
1)
9)*
2)
4)
1)
2)
2)
2)
STATE=MO REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
290210010
290470026
291831002
290210010
290470026
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
(90!
2.2
4.6
2.7
2.5
5.2
6 CONF
( 1.
( 3.
( 2.
( 2.
( 4.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
8,
5,
2,
0,
0,
2.
6.
3.
3.
7.
8)
8)
6)
4)
8)
14 1
13 1
12 1
14 1
12 1
10 1
12 1
13 1
9 1
7 1
15 1
15 1
12 1
10 1
11 1
11 1
53 4
47 4
46 4
44 4
190 16
2
1
4
-2
1
0
2
1
2
-0
0
-1
1
0
5
0
. 1
. 1
.5
.9
.3
.3
.2
.2
.8
.0
.0
.9
.0
.4
.9
.6
( 1.4
( -1.0
( 1.8
( -4.3
( -1.0
( -2.2
( -0.5
( -0.1
( 1.0
( -5.2
( -1.7
( -4.7
( -0.1
( -0.8
( 1.5
( -0.6
2.7)
3.2)
7.2)
, -1.4)
3.6)
2.8)
4.9)
, 2.4)
4.5)
, 5.2)
, 1.7)
0.9)
2.2)
, 1.5)
, 10.2)
1.7)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
27 1
13 1
22 1
20 1
13 1
EST
(90%
-0
1
0
-0
3
.2
.3
.8
.6
.2
. REL.
CONF.
( -0.9
( -0.9
( -0.2
( -1.6
( 1.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.5)
3.6)
, 1.7)
0.3)
5.3)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
291831002
290210010
290470026
291831002
290210010
290470026
291831002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(contl
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
2.6 ( 2.2, 3.4)
2.0 ( 1.6, 2.5)
3.6 ( 2.8, 5.5)
2.2 ( 1.8, 2.8)
2.8 ( 2.2, 3.6)
3.1 ( 2.3, 4.8)
3.5 ( 2.8, 4.5)
3.0 ( 2.6, 3.5)
3.3 ( 2.9, 3.9)
2.4 ( 2.1, 2.8)
3.1 ( 2.7, 3.7)
3.0 ( 2.8, 3.2)
REGION-7 STATE-MO REPORTING
AIRS ID
291892003
A
QUARTER
2
2
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
1 .9 ( 1.1, 8.2)
1.9 ( 1.1, 8.2)
REGION-7 STATE-MO REPORTING
AIRS ID
291892003
291892003
291892003
291892003
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
5.7 ( 4.2, 9. 1)
4.2 ( 3.0, 6.9)
8.6 ( 6.6, 12.8)*
2.8 ( 2.1, 4.5)
5.7 ( 4.2, 9.1)
4.2 ( 3.0, 6.9)
8.6 ( 6.6, 12.8)*
2.8 ( 2.1, 4.5)
6.0 ( 5.1, 7.4)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
26
27
12
29
24
11
25
62
59
68
60
249
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.4 (-1.3
1 0.4 ( -0.2
1 2.9 ( 1 .7
1 0.6 ( -0.0
1 -1.3 ( -2.1
1 0.3 ( -1.5
1 1.4 ( 0.3
3
3
3
3
12
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.5)
, 1.1)
4.1)
1.3)
, -0.4)
2.0)
2.5)
ORGAN IZATION-002 METHOD-117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
2
2
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 0.2 (-11.5
1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 11.9)
ORGAN IZATION-002 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
9
13
10
10
9
13
10
42
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 3.7(1.0
1 1.3 ( -1.3
1 -3.2 ( -7.3
1 1.6 ( 0.2
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
6.3)
3.9)
0.9)
3.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
295100085
295100085
295100085
295100085
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
10.1 ( 9.0, 11.6)*
2.9 ( 2.5, 3.3)
2.2 ( 1.9, 2.5)
5.2 ( 4.5, 6.0)
10.1 ( 9.0, 11.6)*
2.9 ( 2.5, 3.3)
2.2 ( 1.9, 2.5)
5.2 ( 4.5, 6.0)
6.0 ( 5.6, 6.4)
REGION 7 STATE MO REPORTING
AIRS ID
290952002
290952002
290952002
290952002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
2.3 ( 1.8, 3.3)
2.7 ( 2.0, 4.0)
1.6 ( 1.2, 2.3)
1.6 ( 1.2, 2.3)
2.3 ( 1.8, 3.3)
2.7 ( 2.0, 4.0)
1.6 ( 1.2, 2.3)
1 .6 ( 1 .2, 2.3)
2.1 ( 1.8, 2.5)
REGION-7 STATE-MO REPORTING
AIRS ID
290770032
290770032
290770032
290770032
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
6.3 ( 4.8, 9.3)
4.1 ( 3.1, 6.0)
2.2 ( 1.7, 3.3)
2.1 ( 1.6, 3.2)
6.3 ( 4.8, 9.3)
4.1 ( 3.1, 6.0)
2.2 ( 1.7, 3.3)
2.1 ( 1.6, 3.2)
4.1 ( 3.5, 4.9)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
83
75
89
68
83
75
89
68
315
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 1.2 ( -0.6
1 0.4 ( -0.2
1 -0.6 ( -1.0
1 -0.6 (-1.6
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.1)
0.9)
, -0.3)
0.4)
ORGANIZATION 004 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
16
13
14
14
16
13
14
14
57
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -1.7 ( -2.4
1 0.3 (-1.1
1 0.6 ( -0.1
1 -1.0 ( -1.6
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.0)
1.6)
, 1.4)
, -0.3)
ORGAN IZATION-005 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
13
13
12
13
13
13
12
51
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 1.0 ( -2.1
1 1.0 ( -1.0
1 1.2 ( 0.2
1 -1. 1 ( -2.1
1
1
1
1
4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.2)
3.0)
, 2.1)
, -0.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
311090022
311530007
311090022
311530007
311090022
311530007
311090022
311530007
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90% CONF.
3.4
17.2
4.3
4.4
3.5
2.1
1.9
4.7
9.9
4.3
3.1
3.6
5.9
REGION-7
( 2.5,
( 11 .2,
( 3.1,
( 2.9,
( 2.5,
( 1.4,
( 1.3,
( 3.3,
( 7.6,
( 3.3,
( 2.4,
( 2.8,
( 5.1,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5
40
7
10
5
5
3
8
14
6
4
5
7
STATE=NE
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
310550019
310550052
310550019
310550052
310550019
310550052
310550019
310550052
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90!
14.7
26.1
5.6
22.3
3.9
2.6
19.0
13.7
20.6
13.7
3.5
18.3
15.2
REGION 8
6 CONF.
( 10.9,
( 18.7,
( 3.9,
( 13.8,
( 2.9,
( 1.8,
( 12.8,
( 7.0,
( 16.2,
( 10.0,
( 2.7,
( 12.6,
( 13.0,
.6)
.8)*
.1)
.5)*
•7)
.1)
.4)
.0)
.8)*
.5)
.6)
.2)
.0)
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
23
44
10
65
6
4
39
218
28
22
4
35
18
STATE=CO
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
080010001
080410011
080770003
080010001
080410011
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
(90!
4.0
11.1
1.8
5.8
3.6
6 CONF.
( 3.1,
( 7.6,
( 1.3,
( 4.2,
( 2.4,
.4)*
.7)*
.8)*
.0)*
•1)
.9)
.8)*
.3)*
.5)*
.5)*
.9)
.0)*
.2)*
REPORTING
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5
21
3
9
7
.8)
.2)*
.2)
.5)
.6)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
4
9
4
9
4
7
8
13
13
13
15
54
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
2.0
-4.5
2.8
2.8
1.8
2.0
1.3
2. 1
. REL.
CONF
( o
(-27
( o
( -1.
( -o.
( 1
( 0.
( -o.
.1
.0
.7
.8
.1
.1
.1
.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.8)
, 18.1)
5.0)
7.4)
3.7)
3.0)
, 2.4)
5.1)
ORGAN IZATION-003 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
10
8
6
3
11
6
5
1
18
9
17
6
50
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
7.0
-7.7
3.7
4.0
-0. 1
1.4
-3.3
-13.7
. REL.
CONF
( -o.
(-25
( -o.
(-41
( -2.
( -o.
(-23
.9
.6
.1
.3
.3
.5
.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 14.9)
, 10.2)
, 7.5)
, 49.2)
2.2)
3.3)
, 16.7)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
15
6
8
9
5
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
1.2
-3.7
-0.9
-3.5
1.4
. REL.
CONF
( -o.
.6
(-13.1
( -2.
( -6.
( -2.
.0
.5
.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3.0)
, 5.7)
0.3)
, -0.5)
5.0)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
080770003
080010001
080410011
080770003
080010001
080410011
080770003
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
4
5
7
1
6
11
8
5
5
6
9
7
)0!
.2
.6
.9
.4
.4
.5
.6
.9
.1
.4
.2
.2
REGION-8
6 CONF.
( 2.1,
( 4.3,
( 5.9,
( 0.9,
( 4.8,
( 8.8,
( 6.4,
( 4.9,
( 3.9,
( 5.3,
( 7.7,
( 6.5,
RMSE
(contl
INTERVAL)
66.
8.
11.
4.
9.
17.
13.
7.
7.
8.
11.
8.
3)*
2)
9)*
0)
7)
1)*
4)*
5)
3)
2)
4)*
1)
STATE=MT REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
300530018
300630024
300530018
300630024
300530018
300630024
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
3
3
4
4
1
3
4
A
(!
2
3
2
2
2
5
3
2
3
2
)0!
.5
.8
.2
.2
.2
.3
.1
.2
.2
.8
REGION 8
6 CONF.
( 1.8,
( 2.7,
( 1.5,
( 1.6,
( 1.6,
( 3.0,
( 2.4,
( 1.7,
( 2.3,
( 2.4,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
6.
3.
3.
4.
23.
4.
3.
5.
3.
8)
9)
7)
6)
0)
2)*
2)
0)
2)
4)
STATE=MT REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
300470028
300470028
300470028
300470028
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
(90% CONF.
6
4
24
3
6
4
24
3
.8
.7
.4
.2
.8
.7
.4
.2
( 5.2,
( 3.4,
( 18. 1,
( 2.4,
( 5.2,
( 3.4,
( 18. 1,
( 2.4,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
9.
7.
38.
4.
9.
7.
38.
4.
9)
7)
9)*
8)
9)
7)
9)*
8)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
1
14
12
3
12
13
11
29
15
29
36
109
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
12
EST
(90%
-4.2
0.1
-3.4
0. 1
2.4
3.4
4.4
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.7
( -7.2
( -2.8
( -0.8
( -2.3
( 0.2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.9)
0.4)
2.9)
, 5.7)
, 9.1)
8.6)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 116
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
7
8
10
7
2
18
18
9
45
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
EST
(90%
-1.3
1.1
1.0
-0.6
1.7
1.0
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.5
( -1.8
( -0.4
( -1.9
( 0.5
(-31.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -0.1)
4.0)
2.3)
0.7)
2.8)
, 33 . 6)
ORGANIZATION 033 METHOD 119
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
9
10
12
14
9
10
12
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-1.2
2.4
-5.2
0.4
. REL.
CONF.
( -4.5
( -0.2
(-19.8
( -1.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 2.1)
5.0)
9.4)
2.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3 45
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
REGION=8 STATE=MT REPORTING ORGANIZATION=033 METHOD=119
(continued)
NO. OF
EST. REL. RMSE NO. OF SAMPLER EST. REL. BIAS
AIRS ID QUARTER (90% CONF. INTERVAL) OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS (90% CONF. INTERVAL)
12.4 ( 10.6, 15.0)*
45
AIRS ID
300870307
300870307
300870307
300870307
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
22.1 (
3.6 (
6.5 (
12.8 (
22.1 (
3.6 (
6.5 (
12.8 (
13.0 (
. REL.
CONF.
15.3,
2.2,
4.8,
8.6,
15.3,
2.2,
4.8,
8.6,
10.6,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
42.3)*
10.4)*
10.0)*
26.8)*
42.3)*
10.4)*
10.0)*
26.8)*
17.1)*
REGION-8 STATE-ND REPORTING
AIRS ID
380130003
380570004
380130003
380570004
380130003
380570004
380130003
380570004
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
6.1 (
3.4 (
2.1 (
7.9 (
2.8 (
4.8 (
6.6 (
3.7 (
4.8 (
6.9 (
4.2 (
5.2 (
5.1 (
. REL.
CONF.
4.4,
2.5,
1.1,
4.9,
1 .8,
3.3,
4.5,
2.6,
3.8,
4.5,
3. 1,
3.9,
4.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
10.0)*
5.3)
34.0)*
23.0)*
8.3)
9.2)
13.9)*
7.1)
6.6)
16.3)*
7.0)
8.1)
6.2)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
6
3
11
5
6
3
11
5
25
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
9.2 ( -8.9
2.6 ( -2.3
1.4 ( -2.2
-11.3 (-17.7
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 27.3)
, 7.6)
5.0)
, -5.0)
ORGAN IZATI ON-00 1 METHOD- 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
10
1
3
3
6
5
6
19
4
9
11
43
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
-4. 1 ( -7.1
0.9 (-1.1
-2.1
-4.1 (-17.9
-1.9 ( -6.3
1.6 ( -2.4
3.1 ( -3.2
-2.3 ( -4.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.1)
2.9)
9.6)
2.6)
, 5.7)
9.3)
0.3)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
380171004
380171004
380171004
380171004
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
5
2
3
1
5
2
3
1
3
REGION 8
AIRS ID
460130003
460990006
460130003
460990006
460130003
460990006
460130003
460990006
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
.2 (
.5 (
.6 (
.4 (
.2 (
.5 (
.6 (
.4 (
.7 (
. REL.
CONF.
4.1,
1 .8,
2.8,
1.1,
4.1,
1.8,
2.8,
1.1,
3.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
7.
4.
5.
2.
7.
4.
5.
2.
4.
0)
1)
0)
1)
0)
1)
0)
1)
4)
STATE=SD REPORTING
EST
(90%
16
13
4
14
3
6
23
15
13
11
5
20
13
REGION 8
AIRS ID
461031001
461031001
461031001
461031001
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
18
11
6
7
18
11
6
7
9
.1 (
.0 (
.5 (
.2 (
.2 (
.6 (
.4 (
.7 (
.7 (
.3 (
.2 (
.5 (
.1 (
. REL.
CONF.
9.3,
9.3,
2.6,
8.8,
2.4,
4.9,
16.8,
10.9,
10. 1,
7.6,
4.2,
15.8,
11.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
71.
22.
19.
41.
4.
9.
40.
30.
21.
23.
6.
29.
15.
2)*
2)*
8)*
4)*
8)
9)
1)*
1)*
8)*
7)*
8)
9)*
6)*
STATE=SD REPORTING
EST
)0%
.5 (
.9 (
.1 (
.8 (
.5 (
.9 (
.1 (
.8 (
.7 (
. REL.
CONF.
11.4,
7.4,
4.5,
5.5,
11 .4,
7.4,
4.5,
5.5,
7.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
54.
34.
9.
14.
54.
34.
9.
14.
12.
0)*
7)*
4)
0)*
0)*
7)*
4)
0)*
8)*
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
20
9
18
14
20
9
18
14
61
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
2.3
0.2
0.8
-0.3
. REL.
CONF.
( 0.5
( -1.4
( -0.6
( -1.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
4.2)
1.9)
2.3)
0.4)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 119
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
2
8
2
3
12
12
8
6
10
5
24
14
53
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
10.5
6.3
3.2
-8.3
1.2
2.4
-17.3
6.8
. REL.
CONF.
(-66.9
( -1.9
(-16.8
(-32.0
( -0.3
( -0.9
(-28.6
( -6.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 87.8)
, 14.4)
, 23.2)
, 15.4)
2.8)
, 5.7)
, -5.9)
, 19.6)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
3
3
11
7
3
3
11
7
24
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
-9.2
-11.4
-1.8
0.9
. REL.
CONF.
(-42.3
(-18.5
( -5.1
( -5.2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 23.8)
, -4.2)
, 1.6)
7.0)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
490110001
490570007
490110001
490570007
490110001
490570007
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
2
3
3
4
4
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
4
3
5
5
2
4
4
5
3
4
REGION 8
AIRS ID
490353007
490494001
490353007
490494001
490353007
490494001
490353007
490494001
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
3
14
10
6
20
3
2
2
14
7
15
2
10
REGION 8
AIRS ID
560330002
560330002
560330002
560330002
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
.6 (
.8 (
.9 (
.0 (
.5 (
.8 (
.2 (
.5 (
.8 (
.8 (
. REL.
CONF.
2.7,
2.2,
4.4,
3.7,
1 .8,
3.5,
2.8,
4.4,
3.0,
4.1,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
20.
16.
9.
7.
4.
7.
10.
7.
5.
5.
4)*
9)*
2)
7)
1)
8)
1)*
3)
3)
8)
STATE=UT REPORTING
EST
)0%
.7 (
.9 (
.3 (
.1 (
.3 (
.7 (
.2 (
.9 (
.2 (
.8 (
.0 (
.6 (
.4 (
. REL.
CONF.
1 .9,
10.9,
6.7,
4.4,
14.8,
2.6,
1 .7,
2.2,
10.5,
5.9,
11 .8,
2.1,
9. 1,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
58.
24.
24.
10.
33.
6.
3.
4.
22.
11.
21.
3.
12.
6)*
5)*
5)*
5)*
4)*
3)
3)
5)
6)*
8)*
0)*
4)
2)*
STATE=WY REPORTING
EST
(90%
4
4
8
2
4
4
8
2
.5 (
.1 (
.6 (
.3 (
.5 (
.1 (
.6 (
.3 (
. REL.
CONF.
3.5,
2.9,
6.4,
1 .7,
3.5,
2.9,
6.4,
1.7,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.
7.
13.
3.
6.
7.
13.
3.
6)
0)
8)*
4)
6)
0)
8)*
4)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
2
2
11
11
9
9
4
22
18
44
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
EST
(90%
-4.5
-2. 1
2.0
1.6
1.9
2.8
. REL.
CONF.
(-11.1
(-22.4
( -1.2
( -1-1
( 0.8
( 0.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.1)
, 18.1)
, 5.2)
4.3)
3.0)
5.3)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
1
9
4
8
9
8
12
11
10
12
17
23
62
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
EST
(90%
-3.7
-2.1
8.6
3.4
7.8
3.1
-1.1
2.2
. REL.
CONF.
(-11.8
( 0.8
( -0.3
( -4.5
( 1.8
( -2.1
( 1-1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 7.6)
, 16.3)
7.0)
, 20.2)
, 4.5)
, -0.1)
3.3)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
14
8
10
13
14
8
10
13
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
1.3
0.5
-0.7
1.7
. REL.
CONF.
( -0.8
( -2.4
( -5.9
( 1.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 3.4)
, 3.4)
4.6)
2.5)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3 48
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
REGION=8 STATE=WY REPORTING ORGANIZATION=001 METHOD=117
(continued)
NO. OF
EST. REL. RMSE NO. OF SAMPLER EST. REL. BIAS
AIRS ID QUARTER (90% CONF. INTERVAL) OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS (90% CONF. INTERVAL)
5.2 ( 4.5, 6.3)
45
AIRS ID
040191028
040191028
040191028
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
1
2
3
A
EST
(90%
6.7 (
4.3 (
4.8 (
6.7 (
4.3 (
4.8 (
5.0 (
. REL.
CONF.
4.1,
3.1,
3.0,
4.1,
3. 1,
3.0,
3.9,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
19.4)*
7.4)
14.0)*
19.4)*
7.4)
14.0)*
7.3)
REGION 9 STATE CA REPORTING
AIRS ID
060170011
061010003
060170011
061010003
060170011
061010003
060170011
061010003
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
pFr.rr
EST
(90%
2.0 (
10.2 (
6.9 (
3.3 (
4.2 (
6.1 (
4.7 (
2.0 (
7.4 (
5.0 (
5.5 (
3.4 (
5.4 (
iw-Q <;
. REL.
CONF.
1 .5,
7.4,
4.3,
2.2,
2.8,
4.5,
3.5,
1.5,
5.8,
3.6,
4.3,
2.8,
4.7,
TATF-f
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.4)
16.8)*
20.3)*
7.0)
8.8)
10. 1)*
7.5)
2.9)
10.2)*
8.5)
8.1)
4.5)
6.4)
'A pFpnpTTwr.
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
3
8
3
3
8
3
14
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
-6.3 (-10.9
-2.5 ( -5.1
2.8 ( -5.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -1.7)
, -0.0)
, 10.9)
ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 117
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
9
3
5
5
9
10
14
18
8
14
24
64
npr.AWT7ATTni>
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
8
j-nn i MFTHf
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
0.7 ( -0.6
5.2 ( -0.5
-5.6 (-14.0
-1.5 ( -4.7
-1.9 ( -5.9
2.0 (-1.8
2.8 ( 0.5
-0.7 ( -1.6
in i ?n
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.0)
, 11.0)
2.8)
1.7)
, 2.1)
5.9)
5.1)
0.3)
AIRS ID QUARTER
060190008 1
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
13.4 ( 9.5, 24.2)*
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
1
EST. REL. BIAS
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
060571001
060670006
060190008
060571001
060670006
060190008
060571001
060670006
060190008
060571001
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
8
10
5
17
9
7
7
10
5
3
10
7
8
4
8
)0!
.5
.5
.6
.7
.1
.2
.7
.4
.1
.7
.8
.9
.0
.6
.4
REGION-9
6 CONF.
( 6.2,
( 7.5,
( 4.2,
( 9.0,
( 6.1,
( 5.6,
( 5.4,
( 7.0,
( 3.8,
( 2.6,
( 8.8,
( 6.2,
( 6.6,
( 3.6,
( 7.4,
(contl
RMSE
INTERVAL)
13.9)*
18.0)*
8.7)
281.9)*
19.0)*
10.4)*
13.8)*
21.8)*
8.1)
6.7)
14.2)*
11.1)*
10.4)*
6.4)
9.6)
STATE=CA REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
060271003
060271003
060271003
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
4
2
3
4
A
(!
6
8
4
6
8
4
7
)0!
.7
.7
.4
.7
.7
.4
.6
REGION 9
6 CONF.
( 3.4,
( 5.8,
( 2.6,
( 3.4,
( 5.8,
( 2.6,
( 5.5,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
107.4)*
18. 1)*
19.5)*
107.4)*
18. 1)*
19.5)*
13.0)*
STATE=CA REPORTING
EST. REL.
AIRS ID
060290014
060798001
061110007
060290014
060798001
061110007
060290014
060798001
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
(90% CONF.
4
3
6
6
2
3
8
3
.3
.6
.2
.0
.9
.4
.3
.0
( 3.2,
( 2.7,
( 4.2,
( 4.4,
( 2.0,
( 2.6,
( 6.4,
( 2.2,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
6.7)
5.5)
13.1)*
9.9)
5.2)
5.1)
12.2)*
4.9)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
8
11
1
5
15
7
5
10
7
24
17
27
17
85
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
11
EST
(90%
7.3
-2.1
1.8
-17.7
-0.9
-2.4
-3.9
-8.8
-3.8
-1.9
. REL.
CONF
( 4
( -9.
( -1.
(-10
( -5.
( -9.
(-14
( -5.
( -4.
.4
.5
.2
.5
.6
.1
.8
.9
.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 10.1)
5.3)
4.9)
, 8.7)
0.8)
1.4)
, -2.8)
, -1.7)
0.6)
ORGAN IZATI ON-0 1 9 METHOD- 118
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
1
5
2
1
5
2
8
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
EST
(90%
-6.7
-1.0
-4.4
. REL.
CONF
(-10
( -5.
.2
.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
8.2)
, -3.6)
ORGANIZATION 019 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
11
5
9
7
12
14
9
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-2.6
-1.8
3. 1
-2.9
-1.8
0.4
-3.8
-2.2
. REL.
CONF
( -4.
( -3.
( -2.
( -6.
( -3.
( -1.
( -7.
( -3.
.6
.6
.8
.3
.6
.4
.4
.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, -0.6)
, -0.0)
8.9)
0.6)
, -0.0)
2.2)
, -0.2)
, -0.8)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
061110007
060290014
060798001
061110007
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
2
5
2
2
4
4
6
3
4
REGION 9
AIRS ID
060710014
060250005
060710014
060730006
060250005
060730006
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
2
2
3
3
1
2
3
A
(!
7
6
7
4
7
12
7
6
10
8
REGION-9
AIRS ID
060250005
060710014
060730006
060250005
060730006
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
4
4
1
4
A
EST
)0%
.3 (
.3 (
.5 (
.9 (
.5 (
.3 (
.1 (
.9 (
.8 (
. REL.
CONF
1 .
4.
1 .
2.
3.
3.
5.
3.
4.
RMSE
(contl
. INTERVAL)
6,
0,
9,
1,
7,
6,
0,
3,
3,
4.
8.
4.
4.
5.
5.
7.
5.
5.
4)
1)
0)
8)
8)
5)
8)
0)
4)
STATE=CA REPORTING
EST
)0%
.9 (
.0 (
8 (
.7 (
.9 (
.9 (
.9 (
.3 (
.7 (
.2 (
. REL.
CONF
4.
4.
5.
3.
5.
9.
4.
5.
8.
7.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
0,
6,
8,
5,
8,
5,
0,
3,
5,
1,
126.
8.
12.
7.
12.
20.
126.
7.
14.
9.
1)*
8)
1)*
5)
5)*
5)*
1)*
9)
5)*
7)
STATE=CA REPORTING
EST
(90%
11
7
7
3
4
8
4
7
.3 (
.0 (
.0 (
•1 (
.7 (
.9 (
.1 (
.2 (
. REL.
CONF
8.
4.
5.
2.
3.
7.
3.
6.
RMSE
. INTERVAL)
4,
8,
2,
3,
6,
3,
3,
2,
17.
13.
10.
4.
7.
11.
5.
8.
5)*
3)*
9)*
9)
0)
5)*
4)
6)
nued)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
6
12
10
9
27
28
29
31
115
NO. OF
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -0.6 ( -2.6
1 -2.9 ( -5.3
1 -0.9 ( -2.3
1 -1.8 ( -3.3
3
3
3
3
12
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1
, -0
0
, -0
•4)
.5)
.5)
•4)
ORGANIZATION 036 METHOD 119
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
1
14
11
10
10
10
1
35
20
56
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -7.9
1 1.0 ( -1.9
1 -1.5 ( -5.9
1 3.1 ( 0.9
1 -0.9 ( -5.7
1 5.9 ( -1.1
1
3
2
6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3
2
5
3
.9)
.9)
.3)
.8)
, 12.9)
ORGAN IZATION-036 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
6
11
10
13
28
23
51
SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 -2.6 ( -8.9
1 4.0 (-1.2
1 0.6 ( -3.4
1 -0.5 ( -2.4
1 1.8 ( -0.4
3
2
5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
3
9
4
1
4
.7)
•1)
.6)
.3)
.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
060371103
060658001
060712002
060371103
060652002
060658001
060712002
060371103
060652002
060658001
060712002
060370002
060371103
060652002
060658001
060712002
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
2
9
3
5
1
5
4
3
1
2
4
5
5
4
6
3
5
4
3
5
4
REGION 9
AIRS ID
150031001
150032004
150032004
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
2
1
2
A
.6 ( 2.0,
.6 ( 7.1,
.5 ( 2.6,
.5 ( 4.2,
.7 ( 1 .2,
.6 ( 3.9,
.0 ( 3.0,
.9 ( 3.0,
.2 ( 0.9,
.2 ( 1.7,
.6 ( 3.4,
.2 ( 2.6,
.5 ( 4.3,
.9 ( 3.6,
.4 ( 4.7,
.1 ( 2.4,
.7 ( 4.8,
.6 ( 3.9,
.2 ( 2.7,
.0 ( 4.3,
.6 ( 4.2,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
15.
5.
8.
2.
10.
6.
5.
1.
3.
7.
82.
8.
7.
10.
4.
7.
5.
3.
6.
5.
8)
2)*
2)
2)
9)
0)
1)
7)
7)
2)
1)
4)*
0)
8)
2)*
6)
1)
6)
8)
0)
1)
STATE=HI REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
7
4
10
5
10
6
REGION-9
AIRS ID
320310016
320310016
320310016
320310016
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
.0 ( 4.3,
.0 ( 2.6,
.6 ( 5.4,
.5 ( 3.9,
.6 ( 5.4,
.3 ( 4.6,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
20.
9.
168.
9.
168.
10.
3)*
5)
8)*
8)
8)*
8)*
STATE=NV REPORTING
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
1
1
1
1
.9 ( 1.4,
.1 ( 0.7,
.7 ( 1.3,
.8 ( 1.4,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
3.
2.
2.
2.
2)
3)
5)
6)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
13
10
12
13
8
7
11
14
13
15
11
1
15
10
10
14
35
39
53
50
177
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
4
5
16
EST
(90%
2.3
-0.8
1.6
0.0
0.3
-1.8
-2.3
3.2
0.3
-1.1
-2.8
-5.2
5.1
3. 1
-5.2
-2.2
. REL.
CONF
( 1
( -6.
( -0.
( -2.
( -0.
( -6.
( -4.
( 2
( -0.
( -2.
( -4.
( 4.
( 0.
( -7
( -3.
.7
.7
.0
.8
.9
.0
.1
.0
.3
.0
.9
.0
.8
.5
.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.9)
5.0)
3.3)
2.9)
1.5)
2.3)
, -0.4)
4.3)
0.9)
, -0.3)
, -0.8)
, 6.1)
5.4)
, -3.0)
, -1.2)
ORGANIZATION 120 METHOD 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
3
4
1
7
1
8
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
2
1
3
EST
(90%
5.3
3.9
-10.6
. REL.
CONF
( -3.
( 2
.9
.4
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 14.6)
5.3)
ORGAN IZATION-200 METHOD- 120
NO. OF
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
5
13
15
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-0.4
0.5
0.2
0.3
. REL.
CONF
( -1.
( -0.
( -0.
( -0.
.6
.6
.6
.5
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.9)
, 1.5)
1.1)
, 1.2)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
A
A
A
A
A
(continued)
NO. OF
EST. REL. RMSE NO. OF SAMPLER EST. REL.
QUARTER (90% CONF. INTERVAL) OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS (90% CONF.
1 1.9(1.4, 3.2) 9 1
2 1.1 ( 0.7, 2.3) 5 1
3 1.7 ( 1.3, 2.5) 13 1
4 1.8 ( 1.4, 2.6) 15 1
A 1.7(1.5, 2.1) 42 4
DmnW-O CTATT7-WV DPDHDTTWr HOT A W T7 ATT HW-Qnn MPTUnri- 1 9n
NO. OF
EST. REL. RMSE NO. OF SAMPLER EST. REL.
AIRS ID
320030560
320030560
320030560
320030560
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
(90%
3.5 (
12.7 (
3.9 (
6.3 (
3.5 (
12.7 (
3.9 (
6.3 (
7.3 (
REGION-10
AIRS ID
020200018
020900010
021100004
020900010
021100004
020200018
020900010
021100004
020200018
020900010
021100004
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
20.0 (
10.0 (
1.2 (
3.1 (
6.2 (
4.3 (
2.1 (
3.3 (
2.3 (
2.2 (
2.7 (
10.8 (
4.6 (
2.9 (
2.4 (
7.2 (
CONF.
2.5,
9.3,
2.9,
4.9,
2.5,
9.3,
2.9,
4.9,
6.2,
INTERVAL)
6.0)
20.9)*
5.9)
9.2)
6.0)
20.9)*
5.9)
9.2)
8.9)
OBSERVATIONS
8
9
12
14
8
9
12
14
43
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
(90% CONF.
-1.9 ( -4.0
0.9 ( -7.5
-1.4 ( -3.3
-0.1 ( -3.2
BIAS
INTERVAL)
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.3)
9.2)
0.6)
3.0)
STATE-AK REPORTING ORGANIZATION-020 METHOD-117
NO. OF
. REL.
CONF.
13.5,
7.5,
0.9,
1 .9,
3.6,
2.2,
1 .3,
1.7,
1.6,
1.7,
2.0,
8.8,
3.1,
2.0,
2.0,
6.3,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
41.9)*
15.5)*
1.9)
9.1)
27.2)*
68.3)*
6.1)
53.3)*
3.9)
3.2)
4.7)
13.9)*
9.6)
6.1)
3.0)
8.4)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
5
11
11
3
2
1
3
1
8
14
8
27
5
5
30
67
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
3
11
EST. REL.
(90% CONF.
8.4 (-10.9
-3.0 ( -8.5
-0.2 ( -0.9
0. 1 ( -6.3
1.5 (-36.2
4.3
0.3 ( -4.0
3.3
1.4 ( 0.1
-0.5 ( -1.6
0.3 (-1.6
BIAS
INTERVAL)
, 27.8)
, 2.5)
0.5)
6.5)
, 39.2)
4.6)
, 2.7)
0.5)
2.3)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
160270004
160690009
160830010
160270004
160690009
160830010
160270004
160690009
160830010
160270004
160690009
160830010
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
3.6 (
2.4 (
2.3 (
4.1 (
1.9 (
4.2 (
3.5 (
3.1 (
2.2 (
2.8 (
2.9 (
2.8 (
2.8 (
3.3 (
3.0 (
2.8 (
3.0 (
REGION 10
AIRS ID
160550006
160550006
160550006
160550006
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
A
EST
(90%
3.3 (
2.3 (
4.6 (
3.2 (
3.3 (
2.3 (
4.6 (
3.2 (
3.4 (
REGION 10
AIRS ID
410650007
410650007
410650007
410650007
A
QUARTER
1
2
3
4
1
EST
(90%
6.3 (
2.4 (
4.0 (
2.0 (
6.3 (
. REL.
CONF.
2.6,
1 .8,
1.6,
2.5,
1 .3,
2.7,
2.6,
2.3,
1.6,
2.1,
2.2,
2.0,
2.3,
2.5,
2.5,
2.4,
2.7,
RMSE
INTERVAL)
5.
3.
4.
12.
3.
9.
5.
4.
3.
4.
4.
4.
3.
4.
3.
3.
3.
STATE=ID
. REL.
CONF.
2.5,
1.5,
3.2,
2.4,
2.5,
1 .5,
3.2,
2.4,
2.9,
RMSE
9)
8)
1)
0)*
6)
9)
6)
8)
8)
5)
2)
8)
7)
9)
9)
6)
4)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
9
11
7
3
6
4
10
11
8
10
13
8
27
13
29
31
100
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
12
EST
(90%
-0.2
0.3
-0.8
0.0
0.6
0.9
2.4
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.2
-1.0
. REL.
CONF
( -2
( -1
( -2
( -8.
( -1.
( -4.
( 0.
( -1.
( -0.
( -1.
( -0.
( -2
.5
.0
.5
.4
.0
.6
.8
.1
.8
.0
.1
.9
BIAS
INTERVAL)
2.1)
1.7)
0.9)
8.5)
2.2)
6.5)
4.0)
2.4)
2.2)
, 2.4)
2.6)
0.9)
REPORTING ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 118
NO. OF
INTERVAL)
5.
5.
8.
4.
5.
5.
8.
4.
4.
STATE=OR
. REL.
CONF.
4.7,
1.6,
2.7,
1 .5,
4.7,
RMSE
1)
4)
2)
6)
1)
4)
2)
6)
3)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
11
4
7
14
11
4
7
14
36
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
EST
(90%
-1.0
0.8
-0.4
-1.9
. REL.
CONF
( -2.
( -2.
( -4.
( -3.
.8
.1
.0
.1
BIAS
INTERVAL)
0.8)
, 3.7)
3.2)
, -0.6)
REPORTING ORGANIZATION 001 METHOD 117
NO. OF
INTERVAL)
9.
5.
8.
3.
9.
5)
7)
4)
0)
5)
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
12
4
5
13
12
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
1
1
EST
(90%
-1.9
-1.1
-3.2
0.0
. REL.
CONF
( -5.
( -4.
( -5.
( -1.
.2
.0
.8
.0
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.3)
, 1.8)
, -0.5)
1.1)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
AIRS ID
A
A
A
A
AIRS ID
410290133
410330107
410370001
410390060
410510080
410671003
410290133
410330107
410370001
410510080
410671003
410290133
410330107
410370001
410510080
410671003
410290133
410330107
410370001
410510080
410671003
A
A
A
A
A
QUARTER
2
3
4
A
REGK
QUARTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
(!
2
4
2
4
(!
3
5
4
3
2
6
2
5
5
2
3
3
2
1
4
13
6
3
3
3
2
4
3
7
4
4
EST
)0%
.4 (
.0 (
.0 (
.3 (
)
EST
)0%
.5 (
.9 (
.2 (
.5 (
.5 (
.5 (
.0 (
.0 (
.1 (
.9 (
.7 (
.1 (
.7 (
.6 (
.7 (
.6 (
.2 (
.1 (
.5 (
.9 (
.2 (
.5 (
.3 (
.2 (
.1 (
.8 (
. REL.
CONF
1 .
2.
1 .
3.
RMSE
(c,
. INTERVAL)
6,
7,
5,
6,
. REL.
CONF
2.
4.
2.
2.
1 .
4.
1 .
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
1 .
0.
3.
9.
4.
2.
2.
3.
1 .
4.
2.
5.
3.
4.
5.
8.
3.
5.
RMSE
7)
4)
0)
4)
REPO]
. INTERVAL)
6,
4,
8,
6,
9,
9,
3,
9,
6,
1,
3,
1,
8,
9,
3,
4,
7,
2,
6,
0,
6,
0,
6,
9,
5,
4,
5.
9.
8.
5.
3.
9.
4.
22.
81.
4.
10.
5.
5.
7.
8.
26.
9.
5.
5.
5.
3.
5.
4.
9.
4.
5.
4)
4)
8)
4)
6)
9)
8)
1)*
5)*
8)
7)*
9)
6)
0)
0)
1)*
7)
3)
5)
5)
5)
3)
6)
3)
9)
3)
REPORTING ORGANIZATION=001
(continued)
METHOD=117
NO. OF
OBSERVATIONS
4
5
13
34
NO. OF
SAMPLER
QUARTERS
1
1
1
4
NG ORGANIZATION=001
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
11
10
5
11
14
12
4
2
1
9
3
6
5
2
8
6
11
8
10
15
10
63
19
27
54
163
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
5
5
5
21
EST. REL. BIAS
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
EST
(90%
-0.2
4.3
0.6
1.4
-0.6
0.7
1.6
-2.3
5. 1
2.2
0.9
-0.8
2.3
0.6
3.2
-3.5
3.5
2.6
1.2
3.2
0.0
. REL.
CONF.
( -2.1
( 1.9
( -3.8
( -0.5
( -1.7
( -2.8
( -0.0
(-30.4
( 1.0
( -6.5
( -3.5
( 0.9
( -8.8
( 0.7
(-15.4
( 0.6
( 1.3
( -0.8
( 2.1
( -1.3
BIAS
INTERVAL)
1.8)
6.8)
5.1)
3.2)
0.6)
4.2)
3.3)
, 25.8)
3.5)
8.2)
1.9)
3.8)
, 10.0)
5.6)
8.4)
6.5)
3.8)
3.2)
, 4.2)
, 1.4)
-------
ESTIMATES OF RELATIVE PRECISION (REL. RMSE) BASED ON CALCULATION OPTION 3
* INDICATES UPPER BOUND OF ESTIMATED 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVAL > 10%
REGION=10 STATE=WA REPORTING ORGANIZATION=001 METHOD=118
EST. REL. RMSE
(90% CONF. INTERVAL)
NO. OF
NO. OF SAMPLER
OBSERVATIONS QUARTERS
530330057
530530031
530630016
530730015
530330057
530530031
530630016
530730015
530770009
530330057
530530031
530630016
530730015
530770009
530330057
530530031
530630016
530730015
530770009
A
A
A
A
A
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
A
2
2
1
1
2
4
2
4
1
5
4
6
3
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
3
5
2
3
.0 (
.4 (
.4 (
.5 (
.8 (
.1 (
.8 (
.6 (
.0 (
.7 (
.1 (
.9 (
.6 (
.2 (
.6 (
.3 (
.5 (
.9 (
.7 (
.0 (
.5 (
.3 (
.9 (
.6 (
1 .6,
1 .9,
1.1,
1 .0,
2.1,
3.1,
1.9,
3. 1,
0.5,
4.3,
3. 1,
5.3,
2.5,
1 .5,
2.8,
1 .7,
2.7,
2.0,
1 .3,
1.7,
3.0,
4.5,
2.5,
3.4,
3
3
2
3
4
6
5
9
15
8
6
9
6
4
5
3
5
5
2
2
4
6
3
4
.0)
.6)
.2)
.6)
.2)
.2)
.3)
.7)
.3)*
.6)
.3)
.9)
.9)
.2)
.1)
.5)
.2)
.6)
.5)
.4)
.4)
.3)
.4)
.0)
14
13
12
4
12
12
6
5
1
12
12
15
6
6
15
12
14
6
15
43
36
51
62
192
1 0
1 1
1 0
1 -0
1 -0
1 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 4
1 0
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 -1
1 -2
1 1
4
5
5
5
19
.9 (
.4 (
.6 (
.5 (
.7 (
.3 (
.0 (
.8 (
.0
.8 (
.4 (
.3 (
.6 (
.2 (
.2 (
.0 (
.1 (
.1 (
.3 (
0.0,
0.4,
-0.1,
-2.4,
-2.2,
0.4,
-1.3,
-1 .0,
3.2,
-1 .8,
-3.0,
-1.4,
-0.4,
-0.4,
-0.1 ,
-2.7,
-3.9,
0.7,
1.8)
2.4)
1.3)
1.5)
0.7)
4.1)
3.3)
6.7)
6.4)
2.6)
3.5)
4.5)
2.9)
2.8)
2.1)
0.6)
-0.2)
1.8)
-------
-------
Attachment 5
PM2.5 Accuracy (Flow Rate)
This section covers the following attachments related to flow rate accuracy:
5-1 Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
5-2 Flow Rate Audit Data Completeness
5-3 Flow Rate Data Summaries
1) Annual Flow Rate Data Summary
2) Quarterly Flow Rate Summary
3) Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check
4) Site/Days with True or Measured Flow Rate >5% of 16.67 1/m
5)Site/Days with True or Measured Flow Rate >10% of 16.67 1/m
-------
Attachment 5-1
Quarterly Completeness Graphs by EPA Region
-------
Completeness - Accuracy
Data Capture by Region, 2000 Qtr1-Qtr4
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
200
150
Quarter 1
164
170
_a
E
100
75
50
52 39
0 LJ-
75%~
52
69%
-96-
59
62%
137
80%
95
c;c;o/,.
Q7
39
4U%
56
60 93%
56
48
86%
10
200
150
OT
M—
O
w 100
E
z
50
Quarter 2
166
Q7
79
53 40
75%
55
70%
61
63%
137
83%
171
•439-
75%
100
98
43
56
60 93%
51
52 98%
58
59%
58
52
89%
10
Goal (All FRM SLAMS Sites)
W/ Accuracy Data
-------
Completeness - Accuracy
Data Capture by Region, 2000 Qtr1-Qtr4
[7/11/01 AIRS Extraction]
200
150
100
_a
E
50
Quarter 3
165
177
77
53 39
74%
54
70%
62
64%
137
OJVo
155
88%
107
98
42
55
60 91%
52
55 95%
69
70%
52
58 89%
10
200
150
100
10
# of sites
w/ 4 Q's of
Accuracy
29
47
57
110
89
31
42
42
27
45
Goal (All FRM SLAMS Sites)
W/ Accuracy Data
-------
Attachment 5-2
Flow Rate Audit Data Completeness
Field Definitions
STATE:
SITE:
POC:
1" Quarter - 4"1 Quarter .
# Precision:
Percent:
Number of 0 w/ P Data:
All 4 O's Complete:
U.S. and State total rows show the total number of FRM SLAMS sites that operated in 2000 [the
number of sites where the primary FRM sampler has a Monitor Type='2'], the number of FRM SLAMS
sites that operated in all 4 quarters of 2000, the number of SLAMS sites where collocation was required
[25% of the total that operated in all 4 quarters], the number of SLAMS sites reporting precision
information, and the number of SLAMS sites with 4 complete quarters of precision information. After
each State name, all FRM SLAMS sites with 2000 collocation information in AIRS are listed.
Site Identification Code = State FIPS code (2 char.) + County FIPS code (3 char.) + AIRS Site ID (4
char.)
Parameter Occurrence Code.
The total number of collocated FRM sample pairs reported to AIRS for each quarter in 2000 for the
primary SLAMS monitor. [If culled from the raw data, at least on of the samples is from the primary
SLAMS monitor.]
The precision data
capture for each
quarter in 2000 for
the primary SLAMS
monitor. [Note:
Equals '# Precision' /
15, capped at 100%]
The number of quarters in 2000 where precision information (collocated pairs) are reported .
T = All 4 quarters are 'complete' [11+ pairs]
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
U.S.
AL
AK
AZ
AR
SITE
# SLAMS operated
# SLAMS operated
010270001
010331002
010690002
010730023
010732003
010735002
010890014
010970002
011010007
011030010
011130001
011170006
011190002
011210002
011250003
011270002
# SLAMS operated
020200018
020200044
020900010
021100004
021700004
021700008
022900003
# SLAMS operated
040031005
040051008
040190011
040191028
040230004
# SLAMS operated
050010001
050010010
050030003
050030004
050310001
050350004
050450002
050510002
050690005
050890001
050910001
050910004
050930007
051070001
051130002
051150003
POC
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
in 2000=972; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=906; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=906; #w/ Accuracy Data =792; #w/4QAcc.=5
n 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=16; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=16; # w/ Accuracy Data = 1 ; #w/4QAcc.= 1
1
n 2000=
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
n 2000=
1
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
111141
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 6; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 6; # w/ Accuracy Data = 7; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 3
111141
11013
111141
111141
01113
01113
0112.
5; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 5; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 5; # w/ Accuracy Data = 1 ; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
00000
00000
00000
01102
00000
n 2000=24; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=14; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=14; # w/ Accuracy Data =23; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11002
101.
11002
101.
10113
11103
1113.
111141
111141
111141
00000
11103
021.
11103
211141
11103
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE SITE PC
051190003 1
051190007 1
051191004 1
051191008 1
051310008 1
051390004 1
051430003 1
051450001 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
01001
10022
112.
111141
02113
111141
02012
0112.
CA # SLAMS operated in 2000=83; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=80; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=80; # w/ Accuracy Data =74; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=25
060010007 1
060011001 1
060070002 1
060090001 1
060111002 1
060130002 1
060170011 1
060170012 1
060190008 1
060195001 1
060195025
060231002 1
060250003 1
060250005 1
060251003 1
060271003 1
060290010 1
060290011 1
060290012 1
060290014 1
060290016 1
060310004 1
060333001 1
060370002 1
060371002 1
060371103 1
060371201 1
060371301 1
060371601 1
060372005 1
060374002 1
060379002 1
060450006
060472510 1
060490001 1
060510001
060531002
060531003 1
060570005 1
060571001 1
00112
00112
111141
111141
212241
00112
01001
01001
111141
111141
00000
10113
111141
111141
111141
01102
111141
111141
01113
111141
112141
111141
10113
11103
11103
11103
11103
11103
11103
11103
11103
111141
00000
211141
111141
00000
00000
10113
111141
01113
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE SITE PC
060590001 1
060610006 1
060631006 1
060631008
060631009 1
060651003 1
060652002 1
060655001 1
060658001 1
060670006 1
060670010 1
060674001 1
060710014 1
060710025 1
060710306 1
060712002 1
060719004 1
060730001
060730003 1
060730006
060731002 1
060731007
060750005 1
060771002 1
060792002 1
060798001 1
060811001 1
060830010 1
060831007 1
060850004 1
060852003 1
060870007 1
060890004 1
060950004 1
060970003 1
060990005 1
061010003 1
061072002 1
061110007 1
061110009
061112002 1
061113001 1
061131003 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
11103
11103
111141
00000
01001
11103
11103
11002
11103
11103
111141
111141
10001
11103
00112
11103
11103
00000
10001
00000
10001
00000
00212
11013
111141
10113
00112
10102
10113
00112
00112
00011
01001
00112
00112
121141
111141
111141
11013
00000
11103
111141
11103
CO # SLAMS operated in 2000=13; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 3; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 3; # w/ Accuracy Data =13; #w/4QAcc.=12
080010001 1
080050005 1
080130003 1
080130012 1
080310002 1
01213
111141
111141
111141
111141
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
SITE
POC
# of Accuracy Records
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
# Q's w/
Accuracy
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
CT
DEL
DC
FL
080390001
080410008
080410011
080690009
080770003
081010012
081230006
081230008
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
# SLAMS operated in 2000=10; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 9; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 9; # w/ Accuracy Data =10; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 9
090010010
090010113
090011123
090031003
090031018
090090018
090091123
090092123
090099005
090113002
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 7; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 7; # w/ Accuracy Data = 7;
100010002
100010003
100031003
100031007
100031012
100032004
100051002
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 3; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 3; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 3; # w/ Accuracy Data = 0; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
110010041 .00000
110010042 .00000
110010043 .00000
# SLAMS operated in 2000=29; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=29; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=29; # w/ Accuracy Data =29; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=22
120010023 1
120010024 1
120090007 1
120111002 1
120112004 1
120113002 1
120170005 1
120251016 1
120256001 1
120310098 1
120310099 1
120330004 1
120570030 1
120571075 1
120710005 1
120730012 1
120814012 1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 1
1 0
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
4
1
3
4
4
4
1
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE SITE PC
120830003 1
120951004 1
120952002 1
120990009 1
120992003 1
121030018 1
121031008 1
121056006 1
121111002 1
121150013 1
121171002 1
121275002 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
111141
11103
221141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
GA # SLAMS operated in 2000=23; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=23; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=23; # w/ Accuracy Data =23; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=23
130210007 1
130210012 1
130510017 1
130510091 1
130590001 1
130630091 1
130670003 1
130890002 1
130892001 1
130950007 1
131150005 1
131210032 1
131210039 1
131211001 1
131270006 1
131390003 1
132150001 1
132150011 1
132230003 1
132450005 1
132450091 1
133030001 1
133190001 1
111141
112141
111141
111141
222141
111141
111141
211141
111141
211141
121141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111341
111241
111141
111141
111141
211141
HI # SLAMS operated n 2000= 5; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 5; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 5; # w/ Accuracy Data = 5; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 2
150030010 1
150031001 1
150031004 1
150032004 1
150090006 1
10113
10113
111141
111141
10113
ID # SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 7; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 7; # w/ Accuracy Data = 6; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 4
160010011 1
160010017 1
160050006 1
160050015 1
160210001
160270005 1
00101
111141
211141
01113
00000
211141
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
SITE
POC
# of Accuracy Records
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
# Q's w/
Accuracy
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
IL
160550006 22 1 1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=35; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=35; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=35;
1 4 1
# w/ Accuracy Data =35; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=26
170010006 1
170190004 1
170191001 1
170310014 1
170310022 1
170310050 1
170310052 1
170310057 1
170310076 1
170311016 1
170312001 1
170313301 1
170314006 1
170314201 1
170316005 1
170434002 1
170890003 1
170971007 1
170990007 1
171110001 1
171132002 1
171150013 1
171190023 1
171191007 1
171192009 1
171193007 1
171430037 1
171570001 1
171610003 1
171630010 1
171634001 1
171670012 1
171971002 1
171971011 1
172010010 1
# SLAMS operated in 2000=40;
180030004 1
180030014 1
180030015
180190005 1
180350006 1
180372001 1
180390003 1
180431004 1
180650003 1
180670003 1
180830004 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
# SLAMS operated
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
all 4 Q=39;
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 3
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 3
1 1 4
1 1 3
1 1 3
1 1 3
1 1 4
1 1 3
1 1 3
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 3
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 3
# where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=39; # w/ Accuracy Data =39;
1 1 4
1 1 3
000
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
1 1 4
2 1 4
1 1
1 1 4
1 1 4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
# w/ 4 Q Acc.=35
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE
SITE
POC
# of Accuracy Records
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
# Q's w/
Accuracy
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
IA
180890006
180890022
180890026
180890027
180891003
180891016
180892004
180892010
180910011
180910012
180950009
180970042
180970043
180970066
180970078
180970079
180970081
180970083
181270020
181270024
181410014
181411008
181412004
181570007
181630006
181630012
181630016
181670018
181670023
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
# SLAMS operated in 2000=18; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=16; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=16; # w/ Accuracy Data =18; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=16
190130008
190330019
190450021
190630003
191032001
191130036
191130037
191390015
191390016
191530059
191532510
191532520
191550009
191630015
191630018
191692530
191770005
191930017
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
KS
# SLAMS operated in 2000=12; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=12; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=12; # w/ Accuracy Data =12; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=12
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
STATE SITE PC
200910007 1
200910008 1
200910009 1
201070002 1
201730008 1
201730009 1
201730010 1
201770010 1
201770011 1
201910002 1
202090021 1
202090022 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
211141
311141
211141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
KY # SLAMS operated n 2000=19; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=19; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=19; # w/ Accuracy Data =19; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 6
210190017 1
210290006 1
210370003 1
210430500 1
210470006 1
210590014 1
210670012 1
210670014 1
210730006 1
210930006 1
211010006 1
211110043 1
211110044 1
211110048 1
211170007 1
211451004 1
211510003 1
211950002 1
212270007 1
10113
11103
11023
00112
11013
01113
111141
11013
11103
01102
10113
111141
10113
111141
11023
10113
111141
111141
111141
LA # SLAMS operated in 2000=21 ; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=21 ; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=21 ; # w/ Accuracy Data =21 ; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=21
220171002 1
220190009 1
220190010 1
220290002 1
220330002 1
220330009 1
220331001 1
220470005 1
220470009 1
220511001 1
220512001 1
220550005 1
220550006 1
220710010 1
220710012 1
220730004 1
111141
111141
111141
111141
121141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
121141
111141
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
ME
MD
MA
220790001
220870004
221050001
221090001
221210001
# SLAMS operated
230030013
230031011
230050027
230090103
230190002
# SLAMS operated
240030014
240030019
240031003
240032002
240051007
240053001
240150003
240251001
240313001
240330001
240338001
240430009
245100006
245100007
245100035
245100040
245100049
245100052
# SLAMS operated
250035001
250052004
250053001
250092006
250095005
250096001
250130008
250130016
250132007
250154002
250170008
250171102
250210007
250230004
250250002
250250027
250250042
250250043
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
in 2000= 5; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 5;
0
0
1 2
1 1
1 2
in 2000=18; # SLAMS operated all
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in 2000=21 ; # SLAMS operated all
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
0
1 1
1 1
1 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 0
0
0
2
1
1
4Q=18;
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4 Q=20;
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
# where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 5;
0
0
2
1
2
# where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
# where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=20;
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
# w/ Accuracy Data =
0
0
0
1
1
; # w/ Accuracy Data
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
# w/ Accuracy Data
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
4
4
4
4
3; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=
0
0
3
4
4
= 0; # w/ 4 Q Ace.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
=20; # w/ 4 Q Ace
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
0
3
2
3
3
3
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
= 0
= 11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
10
STATE SITE PC
250270016 1
250270020 1
250272004 1
# of Accuracy Records
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
1111
1121
1101
# Q's w/
Accuracy
4
4
3
Ml # SLAMS operated in 2000=24; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=22; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=22; # w/ Accuracy Data =24; # w/ 4
260050003 1
260070005 1
260170014 1
260210014 1
260490021 1
260550003 1
260650012 1
260770008 1
260810020 1
260990009 1
261150005 1
261210040 1
261250001 1
261390005 1
261450018 1
261610005 1
261610008 1
261630001 1
261630015 1
261630016 1
261630019 1
261630025 1
261630033 1
261630036 1
0111
0001
0 1
0111
1111
0011
1011
0111
0011
0011
1111
0111
1011
0111
0111
0011
0111
1111
1111
1121
1 1 1
1111
1111
1111
3
1
1
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
MN # SLAMS operated in 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 6; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 6; # w/ Accuracy Data =16; # w/ 4
270376018 1
270530960 1
270530961 1
270531007 1
270532006 1
270953051 1
271095008 1
271230866 1
0011
0001
0011
0001
0001
0001
0010
0001
271230868 20 0 0 1
271230871 1
271230872 1
271377001 1
271377550 1
271377551 1
271390505 1
271453052 1
0010
0011
1101
1111
1110
0001
0011
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
3
1
2
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
1
1
Q Acc.= 8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Q Acc.= 1
1
MS # SLAMS operated in 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 5; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 5; # w/ Accuracy Data =16; #w/4QAcc.=12
280010004 1
280110001 1
280330002 1
1111
1110
1110
4
3
3
1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
11
STATE SITE PC
280350004 1
280470008 1
280490010 1
280490018 1
280590006 1
280670002 1
280750003 1
280810005 1
280870001 1
281090001 1
281210001 1
281230001 1
281490004 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
111141
11103
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
1113.
111141
111141
111141
MO # SLAMS operated in 2000=19; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 7; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 7; # w/ Accuracy Data =19; #w/4QAcc.=14
290210010 1
290370003 1
290390001 1
290470005 1
290470026 1
290470041 1
290770032 1
290910003 1
290950036 1
290950037 1
290952002 1
290990012 1
291831002 1
291860006 1
291892003 1
291895001 1
295100007 1
295100085 1
295100086 1
111141
01113
111141
111141
111141
10113
222241
121141
10001
1113.
111141
111141
111141
111141
222141
111141
01113
111141
111141
MT # SLAMS operated n 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 7; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 7; # w/ Accuracy Data = 7; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 5
300131026 1
300290039 1
300290047 1
300530018 1
300630024 1
300810001 1
301111065 1
111141
111141
111141
211141
111141
01113
11103
NE
# SLAMS operated in 2000=13; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=13; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=13;
310250002
310270001
310310001
310490001
310550019
310550051
310550052
2
3
1
2
1
0
1
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
# w/ Accuracy Data =12; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 3
0 1
0 1
0 1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
12
STATE SITE
310790003
311090022
311111002
311530007
311570003
311770002
NV # SLAMS operated
320030022
320030298
320030560
320031019
320032002
320050008
320310016
320312002
NH # SLAMS operated
330012003
330050007
330070014
330110019
330111007
330130003
330135001
330150009
330190003
NJ # SLAMS operated
340030003
340070003
340071007
340130011
340130015
340155001
340171003
340172002
340210008
340218001
340230006
340270004
340273001
340292002
340310005
340390004
340390006
340392003
340410006
NM # SLAMS operated
350010023
350010024
350010027
POC
1
1
1
1
1
n 2000=
1
n 2000=
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
24002
00000
23103
23203
22203
23203
8; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 8; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 8; # w/ Accuracy Data = 1 ; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
01001
00000
00000
9; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 8; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 8; # w/ Accuracy Data = 0; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
n 2000=19; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 9; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 9; # w/ Accuracy Data =18; #w/4QAcc.=15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
n 2000=
1
1
233341
232241
23023
00000
232241
132241
232141
222141
243241
02233
233341
232341
233441
212241
10202
122341
133341
212141
333241
3; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 2; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 2; # w/ Accuracy Data = 2; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
01012
01012
00000
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
13
STATE SITE PC
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
NY # SLAMS operated in 2000=50; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=43; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=43; # w/ Accuracy Data =41 ; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=32
360010005 1
360010012 1
360050080 1
360050083 1
360050110 1
360070009 1
360130011 1
360271004 1
360290002 1
360290005 1
360291007 1
360310003 1
360470011 1
360470052 1
360470076 1
360470118
360470121
360552002 1
360556001 1
360590005
360590008 1
360590011
360590012 1
360590013 1
360610010 1
360610056 1
360610062 1
360610079 1
360610115
360610117
360610119
360632008 1
360652001 1
360670019 1
360670020 1
360671015 1
360679999
360710002 1
360810094 1
360810096 1
360810097 1
360810116
360850055 1
360850067 1
360893001 1
360930003 1
361010003 1
361030001 1
121141
111141
111141
111141
211141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
1113.
111141
00000
00000
11013
111141
00000
10113
00000
011.
10012
311141
111141
111141
111141
00000
00000
00000
111141
111141
111141
1113.
111141
00000
121141
111141
1113.
111141
00000
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
14
STATE SITE PC
361030005 1
361191002 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
01001
02113
NC # SLAMS operated in 2000=31; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=28; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=28; # w/ Accuracy Data =29; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=23
370010002 1
370210034 1
370350004 1
370370004 1
370510009 1
370610002 1
370630001 1
370650003 1
370670022 1
370670024 1
370710016 1
370810009 1
370811005 1
370870010 1
371190010 1
371190034
371190040 1
371190041 1
371190042 1
371210001 1
371290009 1
371330005 1
371350007 1
371390002 1
371470005 1
371550004 1
371550005
371730002 1
371830014 1
371830015 1
371910005 1
111241
111141
111141
112141
311141
111141
111141
01113
111141
111141
111141
211141
111141
111141
111141
00000
11103
111141
011.
111141
111141
111141
111141
211141
01113
20001
00000
111141
111141
111141
01113
ND # SLAMS operated in 2000= 7; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 6; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 6; # w/ Accuracy Data = 7; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 6
380070002 1
380150003 1
380171004 1
380350004 1
380570004 1
380890002 1
380910001 1
112.
211141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
OH # SLAMS operated in 2000=45; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=37; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=37; # w/ Accuracy Data =40; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
390090003
390170003 1
390170016 1
390170017 1
390230005 1
390350013 1
00000
02223
1 1
1 1
112.
01113
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
15
STATE
SITE
POC
# of Accuracy Records
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
# Q's w/
Accuracy
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
OK
0
1
0
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
OR
390350027
390350034
390350038
390350045
390350060
390350065
390350066
390351002
390490024
390490025
390490028
390490081
390610014
390610040
390610041
390610042
390610043
390617001
390618001
390810016
390811001
390851001
390870010
390930016
390932003
390950024
390950025
390950026
390990005
391130014
391130031
391330002
391351001
391450013
391510017
391510020
391530017
391530023
391550007
# SLAMS operated in 2000= 4; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 4; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 4; # w/ Accuracy Data = 4; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 4
400190295 111 1141
401210415 111 1141
401430110 111 1141
401430131 111 1141
# SLAMS operated in 2000=25; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=25; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=25; # w/ Accuracy Data =23; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=21
410030013 111 1141
410170113 111 1141
410250002 111013
410290133 111 1141
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
0
0
2
3
2
1
1
2
2
0
0
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
2
3
3
2
2
3
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
16
STATE SITE PC
410330107 1
410350004 1
410370001 1
410390060 1
410391007 1
410391061 1
410392013 1
410430009 1
410470040 1
410470109
410470110 1
410510080 1
410510244 1
410510246 1
410590121 1
410610006
410610117 1
410619103 1
410650007 1
410670111 1
410671003 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
00000
111141
111141
11203
111141
111141
00000
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
PA
# SLAMS operated in 2000=37; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=36; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=36; # w/ Accuracy Data =29; # w/ 4 Q Acc.=26
420010001 1
420030008
420030021
420030064
420030067
420030116
420030131
420031008
420031301
420070014 1
420110009 1
420170012 1
420210011 1
420270100 1
420410100 1
420430401 1
420450002 1
420490003 1
420692006 1
420710007 1
420770004 1
420791101 1
420850100 1
420910013 1
420950025 1
420990301 1
421010004 1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
17
STATE SITE PC
421010020 1
421010024 1
421010027 1
421010047 1
421010136 1
421250005 1
421250200 1
421255001 1
421290008 1
421330008 1
# of Accuracy Records
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
2111
2111
1 1 0
2111
2111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
# Q's w/
Accuracy
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PR
Rl
SC
SD
# SLAMS operated
720210009
720530003
720570008
720590016
720610005
720690001
720810001
720970003
721130004
721270003
# SLAMS operated
440030002
440070022
440070023
440071005
440071010
440090007
# SLAMS operated
450130007
450190046
450190048
450190049
450370001
450410002
450450009
450470003
450510002
450630008
450730001
450790007
450790019
450830010
# SLAMS operated
460110002
460130003
460710001
460930001
460990006
in 2000=10; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=10; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=
in 2000= 6;
1
1
1
1
1
1
in 2000=14:
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
in 2000=11
1
1
1
1
1
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 6; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=13; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=
666
555
767
667
767
866
677
756
7
6
4
7
6
6
7
5
5
7
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=10; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)-
1 1 1
2 1 1
1 1 1
10; # w/ Accuracy Data = 0; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
6; # w/ Accuracy Data = 6; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 4
1 4 1
0 3
0 3
1 4 1
1 4 1
1 4 1
:13; #w/Accuracy Data =14; #w/4QAcc.=13
6 4 1
6 4 1
7 4 1
6 4 1
5 4 1
6 4 1
6 4 1
6 4 1
1 1
7 4 1
5 4 1
6 4 1
6 4 1
6 4 1
=10; #w/Accuracy Data =11; # w/4 Q Acc.= 9
1 4 1
1 4 1
1 4 1
1 1
1 4 1
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
18
STATE SITE PC
460990007 1
461030015 1
461030016 1
461030017 1
461030019 1
461031001 1
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
111141
11103
111141
111141
111141
111141
TN # SLAMS operated in 2000=21; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 9; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 9; # w/ Accuracy Data =19; #w/4QAcc.=10
470090005 1
470090011 1
470370023 1
470370025 1
470370036 1
470650031 1
470650032 1
470654002 1
470930028 1
470931017 1
470931020 1
470990002 1
471130004 1
471251009 1
471450004 1
471570014 1
471570038
471570047 1
471571004
471631007 1
471650007 1
10001
0112.
111141
11103
11103
01001
01001
111141
01102
111141
00101
111141
111141
111141
111141
01001
00000
111141
00000
111141
111141
TX # SLAMS operated in 2000=57; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=51; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=51; # w/ Accuracy Data = 0; #w/4QAcc.= 0
480290034
480290052
480290053
480290060
480370004
480391003
480550062
480612002
480850005
481130020
481130035
481130050
481130057
481130069
481130087
481350003
481410002
481410010
481410037
481410038
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
19
STATE SITE PC
481410044
481410045
481410053
481410057
481670014
481670053
481671005
481830001
482010024
482010026
482010051
482010055
482010058
482010062
482010803
482011035
482011037
482011039
482150042
482150043
482450021
482450022
483030001
483091002
483150050
483390089
483550020
483550032
483611001
483750005
484390063
484391002
484391003
484393006
484530020
484530021
484790016
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
)C Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
UT # SLAMS operated in 2000=16; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 2; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 2; # w/ Accuracy Data =14; #w/4QAcc.=10
490030003 1
490050004 1
490110001 1
490350003 1
490350012 1
490353003
490353006 1
490353007 1
490450002 1
490490002 1
490494001 1
031.
00031
111441
111341
111341
00000
21 1441
111341
21 1341
111341
111341
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
20
STATE SITE
490495008
490495010
490570001
490570007
490571003
VT # SLAMS operated
500030005
500070007
500210002
VI # SLAMS operated
780010012
780050008
780050009
VA # SLAMS operated
510130020
510360002
510410003
510590030
510591004
510595001
510870014
510870015
511071005
511390004
515200006
515500012
516500004
516800014
517000013
517100024
517600020
517700014
517750010
518100008
WA # SLAMS operated
530050002
530110013
530330017
530330021
530330024
530330027
530330037
530330057
530330080
530332004
530530029
530530031
530531018
530610005
POC
1
1
1
1
n 2000=
1
1
1
n 2000=
# of Accuracy Records # Q's w/ Accuracy in
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 Accuracy All 4 Q's
01133
111341
00000
111341
1 1
3; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 3; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 3; # w/ Accuracy Data = 3; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 3
111141
111141
111141
3; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q= 1 ; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 1 ; # w/ Accuracy Data = 0; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
00000
00000
00000
n 2000=20; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=20; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=20; # w/ Accuracy Data =20; #w/4QAcc.=19
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
111141
111241
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
111241
111141
01113
111141
111141
111141
n 2000=20; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=1 8; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=1 8; # w/ Accuracy Data =19; #w/4QAcc.=17
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
111141
111141
111141
111141
111141
112141
1 1
111141
111141
00000
111141
111141
111141
111141
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
21
STATE SITE
530611007
530630016
530630047
530670013
530730015
530770009
POC
1
1
1
1
1
1
# of Accuracy Records
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
1111
1111
1111
1111
1111
1 1 1
# Q's w/
Accuracy
4
4
4
4
4
3
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
1
1
1
1
1
wv
Wl
WY
# SLAMS operated in 2000=12; # SLAMS operated all 4 Q=10; # where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=10; # w/ Accuracy Data = 7; # w/ 4 Q Acc.= 5
540030003
540090005
540110006
540290011
540291004
540390009
540390010
540391005
540511002
540610003
540690008
541071002
# SLAMS operated
550090005
550090026
550250025
550290004
550310025
550590019
550710007
550790010
550790026
550790043
550790050
550790051
550790059
550790099
550870009
550890008
551050002
551330027
551330034
551390011
551410016
# SLAMS operated
560131004
560210001
560330001
560330002
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
in 2000=21;
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
in 2000= 4;
1
1
1
1
3
0
2
0
0
3
2
0
3
0
3
3
0
2
0
0
2
0
1
0
3
0
3
# SLAMS operated all 4 Q=21 ;
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
# SLAMS
0
0
4
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
operated all 4 Q= 4;
2
1
4
6
3
0
2
0
0
0
3
2
0
3
0
3
# where Accuracy Reqrd (All)=21
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
# where Accuracy Reqrd (All)= 4;
2
2
1
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
2
2
0
3
0
3
; # w/ Accuracy Data
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
# w/ Accuracy Data =
0
0
0
0
4
0
4
0
0
2
2
4
0
4
0
4
=21
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4;
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
; #w/4QAcc.=19
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
# w/ 4 Q Acc.= 0
-------
2000 PM2.5 Data Completeness, Accuracy (as of AIRS 7/11/01)
22
STATE
SITE
POC
# of Accuracy Records
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4
# Q's w/
Accuracy
Accuracy in
All 4 Q's
-------
Attachment 5-3
1) Annual Flow Rate Data Summary
2) Quarterly Flow Rate Summary
3) Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check
4) Site/Days with True or Measured Flow Rate >5% of 16.67 l/m
5) Site/Days with True or Measured Flow Rate >10% of 16.67 l/m
-------
Annual Flow Rate Summary for CY2000
based on 7/11/01 extraction from AIRS
Num Sites
Method
BGI Single
RP Single
RP Seq
And Single
And Seq
_National
in year
12
91
567
32
223
925
Avg Num
Flow
Checks
Num
per Site Flow Audits
3
3
4
2
3
4
.92
.59
.76
.53
.22
.19
47
327
2700
81
719
3874
Num F 1 ow
Audits Diff
> 4%
4
11
80
3
70
168
Num F 1 ow
% Rates > 5%
> 4% from 16.67
8
3
3
3
9
4
.5
.4
.0
.7
.7
.3
3
8
37
2
47
97
> *
6
2
1
2
6
2
Average
% Accuracy
)%
.4
.4
.4
.5
.5
.5
(%)
-1
-0
-0
-0
-0
-0
.52
. 14
.06
.65
.22
.13
-------
Quarterly Flow Rate Summary for CY2000
based on 7/11/01 extraction from AIRS
Method
And Seq
And Single
BGI Single
RP Seq
RP Single
_National
Qtr
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Num
Sites
143
170
190
168
14
14
23
29
11
12
12
11
489
516
524
518
66
72
78
73
723
784
827
799
Avg Num
Flow
Checks
per Site
1 .07
1 .04
1 .09
1 .08
1.07
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.09
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.36
1.32
1.30
1.30
1.24
1.13
1.03
1.15
1.28
1.23
1.21
1.22
Num Num Flow
Flow Audits Diff
Audits
153
177
207
182
15
14
23
29
12
12
12
11
666
683
679
672
82
81
80
84
928
967
1001
978
> 4%
13
13
24
20
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
2
23
18
20
19
3
2
2
4
41
34
46
47
Num Flow
% Rates > 5%
Average
% Accuracy
> 4% from 16.67 > 5% (%)
8
7.
11
11
6
0
0
6
8
8
0
18
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
4
4
3
4
4
.5
.3
.6
.0
.7
.0
.0
.9
.3
.3
.0
.2
.5
.6
.9
.8
.7
.5
.5
.8
.4
.5
.6
.8
9
9
17
12
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
8
6
10
13
2
3
1
2
21
18
28
30
5
5
8
6
6
0
0
3
8
0
0
18
1
0
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
2
3
.9
.1
.2
.6
.7
.0
.0
.4
.3
.0
.0
.2
.2
.9
.5
.9
.4
.7
.3
.4
.3
.9
.8
.1
-0.83
-0. 10
0. 15
-0.26
-2.09
-0.50
0.33
-0.76
-7.90
0.08
-0.43
2.53
-0.02
0.06
-0.05
-0.24
-0.16
-0.24
0.21
-0.38
-0.30
-0.00
0.02
-0.24
-------
Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
State
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
Rep
Org Date
001 07/13/2000
001 03/03/2000
05/23/2000
05/17/2000
06/01/2000
06/15/2000
04/26/2000
09/05/2000
10/31/2000
11/01/2000
004 08/16/2000
08/15/2000
09/12/2000
08/17/2000
08/17/2000
08/14/2000
Measured
AIRS ID
050910004
060670006
060570005
060631009
060670006
060890004
060990005
060670006
060674001
060771002
060011001
060750005
060750005
060850004
060852003
060950004
Method
117
120
117
120
120
117
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.00
.58
.60
.66
.67
.63
.66
.64
.63
.67
.64
.67
.67
.65
.65
.67
True %
Value
16
20
17
18
12
17
17
19
18
17
17
18
17
17
18
17
.70
.70
.98
.12
.70
.78
.96
.58
.32
.50
.48
.14
.87
.59
.14
.70
Diff
-4
-19
-7.
-8
31
-6.
-7.
-15.
-9.
-4.
-4.
-8.
-6.
-5.
-8.
-5.
.2
.9
.7
. 1
.3
.5
.2
.0
.2
.7
.8
. 1
.7
.3
.2
.8
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
019 02/17/2000
036 03/07/2000
05/02/2000
07/25/2000
07/25/2000
07/25/2000
08/15/2000
061 02/08/2000
05/22/2000
05/31/2000
001 06/09/2000
001 07/13/2000
001 08/29/2000
Oil 05/16/2000
012 12/06/2000
016 09/13/2000
11/28/2000
11/28/2000
060310004
060250003
060251003
060250003
060250005
060251003
060379002
060371002
060371002
060371103
090113002
100010003
120330004
120310099
120570030
120992003
120990009
120992003
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
118
120
118
118
118
118
118
118
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.68
.65
.66
.65
.66
.66
.65
.61
.65
.67
.71
.67
.68
.71
.73
.67
.70
.69
18
17
15
15
16
15
16
18
15
17
15
15
16
15
17
17
17
17
.40
.96
.90
.30
.00
.70
.00
.26
.75
.91
.51
.95
.00
.97
.54
.50
.84
.55
-9.
-7.
4
8
4
6
4
-9.
5
-6.
7
4
4
4
-4.
-4.
-6.
-4.
.3
.3
.8
.8
. 1
. 1
. 1
.0
.7
.9
.7
.5
.2
.6
.6
.7
.4
.9
-------
Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
Rep
State Org Date
GEORGIA 010 03/08/2000
03/09/2000
02/07/2000
03/27/2000
09/25/2000
09/13/2000
11/14/2000
11/19/2000
11/16/2000
HAWAII 120 03/09/2000
ILLINOIS 001 05/16/2000
07/25/2000
07/11/2000
07/25/2000
12/20/2000
12/27/2000
12/26/2000
12/28/2000
12/20/2000
10/17/2000
10/17/2000
10/04/2000
10/05/2000
ILLINOIS 003 01/26/2000
02/16/2000
01/27/2000
01/26/2000
05/25/2000
05/25/2000
06/03/2000
08/15/2000
07/26/2000
08/15/2000
Measured
AIRS ID
130590001
130890002
130950007
133190001
130210012
130590001
132150011
132150011
132230003
150090006
170010006
170990007
171193007
171971002
170311016
170314201
170890003
170971007
171110001
171190023
171191007
171570001
171670012
170310014
170310022
170310076
170313301
170310014
170310057
170310076
170310014
170310052
170313301
Method
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
119
117
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
15
16
16
16
16
16
18
17
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.63
.61
.67
.30
.66
.66
.67
.66
.64
.66
.93
.70
.61
.67
.67
.69
.40
.40
.50
.67
.71
.67
.67
.67
.70
.67
.67
.70
.70
.67
.67
.67
.67
True %
Value
19
19
17
17
18
15
17
16
17
15
16
18
15
18
18
18
16
16
16
17
15
15
15
15
17
15
17
17
17
17
15
15
15
.00
.59
.43
.02
.79
.72
.56
.00
.43
.93
.80
.21
.52
.20
.80
.40
.68
.67
.68
.45
.92
.85
.48
.47
.94
.71
.39
.65
.47
.67
.79
.94
.96
Diff
-12
-15
-4
-4
-11
6
-5
4
-4
4
-5
-8
7
-8
-11
-9
10
4
10
-4
5
5
7
7
-6
6
-4
-5
-4
-5
5
4
4
.5
.2
.4
.2
.3
.0
. 1
. 1
.5
.6
.2
.3
.0
.4
.3
.3
.3
.4
.9
.5
.0
.2
.7
.8
.9
. 1
. 1
.4
.4
.7
.6
.6
.4
IOWA
KANSAS
003
001
02/17/2000
191390016
118
17.40
16.70
4.2
03/09/2000
03/09/2000
03/09/2000
03/25/2000
04/28/2000
04/17/2000
11/16/2000
201730008
201730009
201730010
202090021
200910007
202090021
201910002
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.65
.68
.69
.65
.66
.65
.65
18
17
17
17
17
17
17
.07
.52
.66
.44
.41
.50
.39
-7
-4
-5
-4
-4
-4
-4
.9
.8
.5
.5
.3
.9
.3
-------
Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
State
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI
MONTANA
MONTANA
NEVADA
NEW JERSEY
Rep
Org Date
001 02/09/2000
03/02/2000
02/04/2000
06/12/2000
05/11/2000
06/21/2000
05/01/2000
08/08/2000
08/15/2000
08/23/2000
11/28/2000
10/13/2000
001 05/31/2000
001 03/16/2000
05/12/2000
09/15/2000
12/18/2000
001 05/26/2000
12/12/2000
001 02/22/2000
11/28/2000
11/28/2000
100 08/23/2000
001 03/16/2000
06/21/2000
12/12/2000
10/18/2000
037 03/30/2000
12/19/2000
310 06/14/2000
001 02/22/2000
06/12/2000
07/18/2000
12/15/2000
11/17/2000
12/21/2000
Measured
AIRS ID
210130002
210370003
210670012
210370003
210470006
210590014
210930006
210670012
211010006
211950002
210130002
210370003
220710012
230050015
230190002
230050027
230050028
250210007
250171102
261150005
261630019
261630033
280010004
301111065
300530018
300530018
300630024
300870307
300870307
320050008
340155001
340273001
340310005
340071007
340130015
340270004
Method
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
117
118
118
118
120
120
118
118
118
118
116
116
116
116
119
119
120
118
118
118
118
118
118
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.68
.69
.73
.70
.69
.68
.71
.68
.67
.69
.70
.67
.69
.60
.67
.71
.70
.48
.63
.68
.76
.65
.67
.50
.70
.70
.60
.50
.66
.70
.69
.66
.66
.72
.64
.69
True %
Value
17
15
15
15
18
17
17
17
18
17
13
17
15
17
15
17
17
16
16
17
17
15
15
116
17
15
16
21
17
17
17
15
17
18
17
17
.50
.66
.93
.47
.24
.79
.41
.98
.08
.84
.60
.67
.86
.48
.92
.47
.43
.67
.67
.38
.53
.29
.39
.70
.50
.60
.40
.12
.80
.96
.42
.50
.90
.30
.42
.51
Diff
-4
6
5
8
-8
-6
-4
-7.
-7.
-6.
22
-5.
5
-5.
4
-4.
-4.
4
-6.
-4.
-4.
8
8
-85.
-4.
7.
7.
-21
-6.
-7.
-4.
7.
-6.
-8.
-4.
-4.
.7
.6
.0
.0
.5
.2
.0
.2
.8
.4
.8
.7
.2
.0
.7
.4
.2
.9
.2
.0
.4
.9
.3
.9
.6
. 1
.3
.9
.4
.0
.2
.5
.9
.6
.5
.7
-------
Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
State
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
Rep
Org
001
001
001
006
008
009
010
013
015
101
003
001
001
Measured
Date
03/09/2000
03/31/2000
03/09/2000
03/20/2000
07/17/2000
12/19/2000
10/13/2000
02/15/2000
03/23/2000
05/04/2000
04/04/2000
05/02/2000
08/11/2000
08/14/2000
08/11/2000
11/28/2000
02/09/2000
10/04/2000
09/20/2000
09/06/2000
11/15/2000
11/16/2000
07/13/2000
07/31/2000
11/08/2000
11/08/2000
11/08/2000
11/16/2000
11/22/2000
10/19/2000
01/18/2000
01/20/2000
01/19/2000
04/27/2000
AIRS ID
360050080
360050083
360610010
360710002
360310003
360610010
360930003
370570002
371350007
370570002
370650003
370811005
370010002
370710016
370810009
370010002
380130003
380570004
391530023
390610041
390350013
391130014
391450013
390950024
390950024
390950025
390950026
400390852
421010136
440071010
450470003
450630008
450910006
450370001
Method
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
117
117
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
118
120
120
118
118
118
118
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
15
17
17
18
17
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.66
.66
.65
.67
.67
.65
.68
.50
.30
.60
.40
.90
.40
.37
.15
.50
.70
.60
.80
.65
.57
.78
.60
.80
.66
.67
.63
.70
.67
.67
.72
.70
.71
.69
True %
Value
15
15
15
17
13
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
18
17
17
18
15
18
18
15
19
17
17
15
15
17
17
17
.69
.83
.97
.48
.79
.31
.77
.70
.60
.70
.70
.70
.70
.63
.70
.70
.40
.30
.08
.49
.30
.66
.80
.90
.27
.77
.36
.50
.46
.83
.96
.53
.55
.39
Diff
6
5
4
-4
20
8
5
4
4
5
4
-4
4
4
8
4
-4
-4
-7.
-4.
-4.
-10.
5
-11
-8
5
-14.
-4
-4
5
4
-4
-4.
-4.
.2
.2
.3
.6
.9
.8
.8
.8
.2
.4
.2
.8
.2
.4
.7
.8
.0
.0
. 1
.8
.2
. 1
. 1
. 1
.8
.7
. 1
.6
.5
.3
.8
.7
.8
.0
-------
Site/Days exceeding 4% Flow Rate Check in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
TENNESSEE
UTAH
VERMONT
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
003
001
001
001
001
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
001
001
05/25/2000
04/25/2000
08/22/2000
06/22/2000
03/13/2000
10/13/2000
11/06/2000
12/27/2000
07/24/2000
02/01/2000
03/02/2000
01/20/2000
06/06/2000
09/28/2000
08/11/2000
07/18/2000
08/08/2000
09/28/2000
12/18/2000
09/26/2000
11/30/2000
03/29/2000
08/15/2000
450370001
450790007
450830010
470370023
490494001
490353006
490570007
500210002
530330027
540110006
540110006
541071002
540550002
540390010
540490006
540550002
540890001
540890001
540490006
550290004
550430009
560330002
560210001
118
118
118
120
118
118
117
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
117
117
117
Measured
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
16
17
17
17
17
15
17
15
16
16
15
.65
.70
.70
.64
.70
.70
.60
.68
.69
.44
.47
.40
.05
.50
.40
.48
.43
.88
.50
.80
.70
.70
.90
True %
Value
17
15
17
17
17
18
17
15
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
16
.48
.85
.45
.83
.40
.40
.40
.65
.06
.70
.71
.70
.73
.66
.66
.71
.69
.69
.70
.70
.40
.60
.70
Diff
-4
5
-4
-6
-4
-9
-4
6
-7.
4
4
4
-4
5
4
4
4
-4
4
-5
-4
-5
-4
.7
.4
.3
.7
.0
.2
.6
.6
.6
.4
.5
.2
. 1
.0
.4
.6
.4
.9
.8
.4
.0
. 1
.8
-------
Site/Days with True or Meas Flow Rate > 5% of 16.67 in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
State
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
FLORIDA
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
ILLINOIS
Rep
Org Date
001 03/03/2000
05/23/2000
05/17/2000
06/01/2000
06/15/2000
04/26/2000
09/05/2000
10/31/2000
004 08/15/2000
09/12/2000
08/17/2000
08/17/2000
08/14/2000
019 02/17/2000
036 03/07/2000
07/25/2000
07/25/2000
061 02/08/2000
05/22/2000
05/31/2000
001 10/16/2000
001 06/09/2000
012 12/06/2000
016 11/28/2000
11/28/2000
010 03/08/2000
03/09/2000
09/25/2000
09/13/2000
11/14/2000
001 07/25/2000
07/11/2000
07/25/2000
12/20/2000
12/27/2000
12/26/2000
Measured
AIRS ID
060670006
060570005
060631009
060670006
060890004
060990005
060670006
060674001
060750005
060750005
060850004
060852003
060950004
060310004
060250003
060250003
060251003
060371002
060371002
060371103
080070002
090113002
120570030
120990009
120992003
130590001
130890002
130210012
130590001
132150011
170990007
171193007
171971002
170311016
170314201
170890003
Method
120
117
120
120
117
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
117
118
118
118
118
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
18
.58
.60
.66
.67
.63
.66
.64
.63
.67
.67
.65
.65
.67
.68
.65
.65
.66
.61
.65
.67
.00
.71
.73
.70
.69
.63
.61
.66
.66
.67
.70
.61
.67
.67
.69
.40
True %
Value
20
17
18
12
17
17
19
18
18
17
17
18
17
18
17
15
15
18
15
17
17
15
17
17
17
19
19
18
15
17
18
15
18
18
18
16
.70
.98
.12
.70
.78
.96
.58
.32
.14
.87
.59
.14
.70
.40
.96
.30
.70
.26
.75
.91
.52
.51
.54
.84
.55
.00
.59
.79
.72
.56
.21
.52
.20
.80
.40
.68
Diff
-19
-7.
-8
31
-6
-7.
-15.
-9.
-8.
-6.
-5.
-8.
-5.
-9.
-7.
8
6
-9.
5
-6.
-3.
7
-4.
-6.
-4.
-12
-15.
-11
6
-5
-8
7.
-8
-11
-9
10
.9
.7
. 1
.3
.5
.2
.0
.2
. 1
.7
.3
.2
.8
.3
.3
.8
. 1
.0
.7
.9
.0
.7
.6
.4
.9
.5
.2
.3
.0
. 1
.3
.0
.4
.3
.3
.3
-------
Site/Days with True or Meas Flow Rate > 5% of 16.67 in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
State
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
MAINE
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MISSISSIPPI
MONTANA
MONTANA
NEVADA
NEW JERSEY
Rep
Org Date
001 12/20/2000
10/05/2000
003 01/26/2000
02/16/2000
01/27/2000
05/25/2000
06/03/2000
08/15/2000
001 03/09/2000
03/09/2000
03/09/2000
001 03/02/2000
06/12/2000
05/11/2000
06/21/2000
08/08/2000
08/15/2000
08/23/2000
11/28/2000
10/13/2000
001 03/30/2000
08/31/2000
001 12/12/2000
001 11/28/2000
11/28/2000
100 08/23/2000
001 03/16/2000
12/12/2000
10/18/2000
037 03/30/2000
12/19/2000
310 06/14/2000
001 06/12/2000
07/18/2000
12/15/2000
Measured
AIRS ID
171110001
171670012
170310014
170310022
170310076
170310014
170310076
170310014
201730008
201730009
201730010
210370003
210370003
210470006
210590014
210670012
211010006
211950002
210130002
210370003
230112002
230112002
250171102
261630019
261630033
280010004
301111065
300530018
300630024
300870307
300870307
320050008
340273001
340310005
340071007
Method
120
117
120
120
120
120
120
120
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
117
117
120
118
118
118
116
116
116
119
119
120
118
118
118
Value
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
16
15
16
16
16
16
16
17
16
16
16
16
16
16
.50
.67
.67
.70
.67
.70
.67
.67
.65
.68
.69
.69
.70
.69
.68
.68
.67
.69
.70
.67
.10
.40
.63
.76
.65
.67
.50
.70
.60
.50
.66
.70
.66
.66
.72
True %
Value
16
15
15
17
15
17
17
15
18
17
17
15
15
18
17
17
18
17
13
17
17
15
16
17
15
15
116
15
16
21
17
17
15
17
18
.68
.48
.47
.94
.71
.65
.67
.79
.07
.52
.66
.66
.47
.24
.79
.98
.08
.84
.60
.67
.75
.77
.67
.53
.29
.39
.70
.60
.40
.12
.80
.96
.50
.90
.30
Diff
10
7.
7.
-6
6
-5.
-5.
5
-7.
-4.
-5.
6
8
-8.
-6.
-7.
-7.
-6.
22
-5.
-3.
4
-6.
-4.
8
8
-85.
7.
7.
-21
-6.
-7.
7.
-6.
-8.
.9
.7
.8
.9
. 1
.4
.7
.6
.9
.8
.5
.6
.0
.5
.2
.2
.8
.4
.8
.7
.7
.0
.2
.4
.9
.3
.9
. 1
.3
.9
.4
.0
.5
.9
.6
-------
Site/Days with True or Meas Flow Rate > 5% of 16.67 in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
10
State
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OHIO
OREGON
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
TENNESSEE
UTAH
VERMONT
WASHINGTON
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
Rep
Org
001
001
001
006
010
013
015
001
001
001
003
001
001
001
001
001
Measured
Date
12/21/2000
03/09/2000
03/31/2000
07/17/2000
12/19/2000
10/13/2000
05/04/2000
08/11/2000
09/20/2000
11/16/2000
07/13/2000
07/31/2000
11/08/2000
11/08/2000
11/08/2000
05/23/2000
10/19/2000
01/20/2000
01/19/2000
07/05/2000
06/22/2000
10/13/2000
12/27/2000
07/24/2000
09/26/2000
03/29/2000
AIRS ID
340270004
360050080
360050083
360310003
360610010
360930003
370570002
370810009
391530023
391130014
391450013
390950024
390950024
390950025
390950026
410619103
440071010
450630008
450910006
450190049
470370023
490353006
500210002
530330027
550290004
560330002
Method
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
118
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
117
120
118
118
118
120
118
118
118
118
117
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
16
16
16
17
16
16
16
16
15
16
.69
.66
.66
.67
.65
.68
.60
.15
.80
.78
.60
.80
.66
.67
.63
.00
.67
.70
.71
.70
.64
.70
.68
.69
.80
.70
True %
Value
17
15
15
13
15
15
16
16
18
18
15
18
18
15
19
17
15
17
17
17
17
18
15
18
16
17
.51
.69
.83
.79
.31
.77
.70
.70
.08
.66
.80
.90
.27
.77
.36
.60
.83
.53
.55
.20
.83
.40
.65
.06
.70
.60
Diff
-4
6
5
20
8
5
5
8
-7.
-10.
5
-11
-8.
5
-14.
-3.
5
-4.
-4.
2
-6.
-9.
6
-7.
-5.
-5.
.7
.2
.2
.9
.8
.8
.4
.7
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
.8
.7
. 1
.4
.3
.7
.8
.9
.7
.2
.6
.6
.4
. 1
-------
Site/Days with True or Meas Flow Rate > 10% of 16.67 in CY2000
based on 7/11/01 AIRS Extraction
11
State
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA
GEORGIA
ILLINOIS
KENTUCKY
MONTANA
MONTANA
NEW YORK
OHIO
OHIO
Rep
Org Date
001 03/03/2000
06/01/2000
09/05/2000
019 02/17/2000
010 09/25/2000
03/08/2000
03/09/2000
001 12/20/2000
12/27/2000
12/26/2000
12/20/2000
001 11/28/2000
001 03/16/2000
037 03/30/2000
001 07/17/2000
010 11/16/2000
015 07/31/2000
11/08/2000
Measured
AIRS ID
060670006
060670006
060670006
060310004
130210012
130590001
130890002
170311016
170314201
170890003
171110001
210130002
301111065
300870307
360310003
391130014
390950024
390950026
Method
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
118
116
119
118
120
120
120
Value
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
18
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.58
.67
.64
.68
.66
.63
.61
.67
.69
.40
.50
.70
.50
.50
.67
.78
.80
.63
True
Value
20
12
19
18
18
19
19
18
18
16
16
13
116
21
13
18
18
19
.70
.70
.58
.40
.79
.00
.59
.80
.40
.68
.68
.60
.70
.12
.79
.66
.90
.36
UTAH
001 10/13/2000 490353006
118
16.70
18.40
-------
-------
Attachment 6
PM2.5 Bias (Performance Evaluation Program)
This section covers the following attachments related to bias
6-1 Completeness
1) Bias Completeness Estimates for CY 99 and CY2000
2) Number of pairs by Region/ State/ Year/Site
6-2 Bias Estimates
1) National Bias Estimates
2) Bias Estimates by State/Reporting Organization
-------
Attachment 6-1
1) Bias Completeness Estimates for CY 99 and CY2000
2) Number of Pairs by Region/ State/ Year/Site
-------
National PEP Completeness, for 071101 Extraction
Year=1999
Table of numind by compind
numind(Num PEP) compind(Num Qtrs PEP Occur)
Frequency
1 or 2 PEP
3 PEP
4 PEP
> 4 PEP
Total
1 Qtr 2 Qtrs |3 Qtrs 4 Qtrs | Total
18
18
0
18
0 I
25
Year=2000
65
33
3
101
125
13
138
Table of numind by compind
numind(Num PEP) compind(Num Qtrs PEP Occur)
Frequency
1 or 2 PEP
3 PEP
4 PEP
> 4 PEP
Total
35
26
185
20
36
72
158
16
282
1 Qtr 2 Qtrs |3 Qtrs 4 Qtrs | Total
15
35
213
21
10
62
205 284
-------
National Completeness of PEP/AIRS Pairs, for 071101 Extraction
Year=1999
Table of numind by compind
numind(Num Pairs for Bias) compind(Num Qtrs Pairs for Bias Occur)
Frequency
1 or 2 Pairs for
Bias
3 Pairs for Bias
4 Pairs for Bias
> 4 Pairs for Bi
as
Total
1 Qtr 2 Qtrs |3 Qtrs 4 Qtrs | Total
30
48
67
17
74
78
73
91
30
54
84
78
246
Year=2000
Table of numind by compind
numind(Num Pairs for Bias) compind(Num Qtrs Pairs for Bias Occur)
Frequency
1 or 2 Pairs for
Bias
3 Pairs for Bias
4 Pairs for Bias
> 4 Pairs for Bi
as
1 Qtr 2 Qtrs |3 Qtrs 4 Qtrs | Total
21
83
26
127
27
84
155
Total
24
110
130
270
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
All
1999
All
1999
All
1999
All
1999
All
1999 Ann
All
2000
All
2000
All
2000
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
128
105
119
99
198
148
189
142
206
166
199
164
197
160
191
156
729
579
698
561
209
177
201
172
243
193
238
190
251
209
249
209
4.187
4.255
1.656
1.494
-2.839
-1.652
-3.742
-2.612
-4.526
-2.837
-4.176
-3.320
-5.101
-4.481
-4.331
-3.738
-0.742
-0.573
-3.104
-2.401
-3.399
- 1 . 880
-3.246
-2.319
-6.248
-4.414
-6.915
-5.149
-6.791
-6.124
-7.216
-6.124
10.4574
9 . 0670
4.2195
4 . 1609
0 . 8449
1 . 4604
-1.5911
-0.4463
-2.0485
-0.8080
-2.4229
-1.5733
-0.9826
-1.4292
-2.6998
-2.1507
1.2212
1.3910
-1.1410
-0.4367
-1.0192
0.3337
-1.8151
-0.9966
-2.7354
-1.2128
-5.3453
-3.6253
-4.8671
-4.8743
-5.8359
-4.8743
16.728
13.879
6.783
6.828
4.529
4.573
0.559
1.719
0.429
1.221
-0.670
0.173
3.135
1.623
- 1 . 068
-0.563
3.184
3.355
0.822
1.528
1.361
2.547
-0.384
0.325
0.777
1.988
-3.775
-2.102
-2.944
-3.624
-4.456
-3.624
All
2000
allgtO_l
238
-6.383 -3.1813
0.020
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
All
2000
All
2000 Ann
And Seq 1999 1
And Seq 1999 2
And Seq 1999 3
And Seq 1999 4
And Seq 1999
Ann
And Seq 2000 1
And Seq 2000 2
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
194
233
192
941
773
921
763
41
36
34
30
65
52
65
52
63
55
60
53
54
42
51
41
223
185
210
176
61
54
57
51
68
50
-4.817
-5.615
-4.614
-4.998
-4.225
-6.363
-5.242
15.039
13.928
7.959
7.307
0.421
1.485
0.421
1.485
-1.556
- 1 . 663
-3.459
-2.844
-7.813
-4.058
-1.435
-1.001
6.153
5.627
2.184
2.635
-2.479
1.096
-1.701
-0.140
-6.046
-1.395
-2.8600
-4.1336
-3.2450
-3.0356
-2.2620
-4.4009
-3.2791
25.4442
25.4853
13.1950
12.5787
4 . 5095
5.5016
4 . 5095
5.5016
3 . 6470
3 . 0786
0.5251
0.8572
4 . 5483
0 . 7900
1.9512
2.4959
8.1242
7 . 6003
4.1560
4.6091
2.8212
5.6279
1 . 2024
2.2827
3.4918
5.0187
-0.903
-2.653
-1.876
-1.073
-0.299
-2.438
-1.316
35.849
37.043
18.431
17.851
8.599
9.518
8.599
9.518
8.850
7.820
4.509
4.558
16.909
5.638
5.338
5.993
10.095
9.573
6.128
6.583
8.121
10.160
4.106
4.705
13.029
11.433
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
And Seq 2000 2
And Seq 2000 3
And Seq 2000 4
And Seq 2000 Ann
And Single 1999 4
And Single 1999 Ann
And Single 2000 1
And Single 2000 2
And Single 2000 3
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
bias50gtO_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
65
49
72
60
71
60
60
53
58
53
261
217
251
213
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
8
2
8
2
-4.
-0.
-4.
-3.
-4.
-3.
-8.
-2.
-4.
-2.
0.
0.
-2.
-1.
-147.
-147.
-147.
-147.
-34.
-76.
-20.
-76.
-75.
-75.
-21.
-16.
-21.
-16.
216
663
052
983
048
983
589
704
111
704
182
204
603
323
443
443
443
443
223
202
104
202
877
877
084
278
084
278
-0.
2.
0.
-1.
-1.
-1.
2.
0.
-1.
0.
2.
2.
-0.
0.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
19.
7.
3.
7.
-2.
-2.
-8.
-0.
-8.
-0.
,9497
,1323
,2837
,6671
,4824
,6671
,1901
,3260
,0424
,3260
,1508
,1755
,6331
,6486
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,6559
,0289
,1635
,0289
,7096
,7096
,4861
,9898
,4861
,9898
2,
4,
4,
0,
1,
0,
12,
3,
2,
3,
4,
4,
1,
2,
161,
161,
161,
161,
73,
90,
26,
90,
70,
70,
4,
14,
4,
14,
,317
,928
,619
,649
,083
,649
,969
,356
,027
,356
,120
,147
,337
,620
,316
,316
,316
,316
,534
,259
,431
,259
,458
,458
,112
,298
,112
,298
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
And Single 2000 4
And Single 2000 Ann
BGI Single 1999 1
BGI Single 1999 2
BGI Single 1999 3
BGI Single 1999 4
BGI Single 1999 Ann
BGI Single 2000 1
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
8
5
6
4
23
9
20
8
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
1
2
1
9
7
9
7
2
2
2
2
-46.
-58.
-33.
-46.
-1.
9.
-8.
-4.
-7.
-29.
-7.
-29.
-17.
-17.
-17.
-17.
-234.
-234.
-0.
-5.
-0.
-5.
-186.
-186.
-186.
-186.
278
897
260
146
997
330
998
978
014
036
014
036
131
131
131
131
763
763
388
297
388
297
135
135
135
135
-0.
19.
-11.
-7.
0.
11.
-6.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-0.
-1.
-0.
-1.
-1.
-1.
-1.
-1.
13.
-5.
13.
-5.
2.
-2.
2.
-2.
18.
18.
18.
18.
,0493
,0059
,8383
,4224
,0962
,9009
,8778
,2014
,9635
,9635
,9635
,9635
,5983
,4025
,5983
,4025
,1088
,1088
,1088
,1088
,8631
,7043
,8631
,7043
,1824
,1142
,1824
,1142
,6244
,6244
,6244
,6244
46.
96.
9.
31.
2.
14.
-4.
0.
5.
26.
5.
26.
14.
14.
14.
14.
262.
262.
4.
1.
4.
1.
223.
223.
223.
223.
,180
,909
,583
,301
,189
,471
,758
,575
,817
,231
,817
,231
,914
,914
,914
,914
,489
,489
,753
,068
,753
,068
,384
,384
,384
,384
BGI Single 2000 2
allgtO_l
-115.140 1.1099 117.360
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
BGI Single 2000 2
BGI Single 2000 3
BGI Single 2000 4
BGI Single 2000 Ann
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999 Ann
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
7
7
7
7
74
60
72
60
117
89
108
83
130
102
126
102
131
109
128
106
452
360
-115.
-115.
-115.
-127.
-127.
-127.
-127.
-3.
-3.
-3.
-3.
-5.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-5.
-5.
-7.
-6.
-7.
-4.
-5.
-4.
-7.
-6.
-6.
-6.
-3.
-3.
140
140
140
358
358
358
358
837
837
837
837
459
812
793
812
970
459
098
695
659
882
756
882
119
709
760
093
898
775
1.
1.
1.
-30.
-30.
-30.
-30.
-6.
-6.
-6.
-6.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
-0.
-0.
-4.
-4.
-4.
-2.
-3.
-2.
-3.
-2.
-5.
-4.
-1.
-1.
,1099
,1099
,1099
,2109
,2109
,2109
,2109
,9200
,9200
,9200
,9200
,6546
,6546
,6546
,6546
,3025
,1640
,0352
,1640
,2142
,8910
,5655
,3232
,7589
,8797
,8140
,8797
,6201
,6418
,0799
,3770
,9327
,8087
117.
117.
117.
113.
113.
113.
113.
2.
2.
2.
2.
12.
3.
2.
3.
5.
3.
-2.
-1.
-1.
-0.
-1.
-0.
-0.
1.
-3.
-2.
0.
0.
,360
,360
,360
,518
,518
,518
,518
,528
,528
,528
,528
,064
,140
,863
,140
,542
,677
,033
,951
,859
,878
,872
,878
,121
,425
,399
,661
,033
,158
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
1999 Ann
2000 1
2000
2000
2000
2000 Ann
RP Single 1999 1
RP Single 1999 2
RP Single 1999 3
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
434
351
131
111
128
109
156
134
154
132
155
136
154
136
155
125
154
124
597
506
590
501
12
8
12
8
13
5
13
5
10
6
10
-5.701
-5.120
-6.058
-4.844
-5.044
-4.175
-8.147
-6.750
-8.492
-6.997
-7.847
-7.125
-8.026
-7.125
-7.194
-6.898
-6.746
-6.269
-6.855
-6.064
-7.484
-6.694
-3.560
-5.292
-3.560
-5.292
-15.572
-12.691
-15.572
-12.691
-10.826
-11.183
-10.826
-3.7358
-3.1529
-3.5052
-2.3264
-3.4242
-2.7635
-4.6755
-2.8705
-6.7381
-5.2496
-5.7254
-5.6422
-6.4496
-5.6422
-5.4441
-5.3130
-5.1124
-4.9000
-4.8908
-4.0995
-5.5195
-4.7288
4.4929
3.4610
4.4929
3.4610
-7.6132
2.4341
-7.6132
2.4341
-2.9774
- 1 . 0670
-2.9774
-1.770
-1.186
-0.952
0.191
- 1 . 804
-1.352
- 1 . 204
1.009
-4.985
-3.502
-3.604
-4.160
-4.873
-4.160
-3.694
-3.728
-3.479
-3.531
-2.927
-2.135
-3.556
-2.764
12.546
12.214
12.546
12.214
0.345
17.559
0.345
17.559
4.871
9.049
4.871
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
RP Single 1999 3
bias50gt6_l
-11.183 -1.0670
9.049
RP Single 1999 4
RP Single 1999 Ann
RP Single 2000 1
RP Single 2000 2
RP Single 2000 3
RP Single 2000 4
RP Single 2000 Ann
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
8
6
8
6
43
25
43
25
11
8
11
8
14
7
14
7
15
10
15
10
13
9
13
9
53
34
53
34
-15.650
-5.445
-15.650
-5.445
-3.915
-0.024
-3.915
-0.024
-10.748
-14.755
-10.748
-14.755
-19.017
-21.673
-19.017
-21.673
-22.936
-17.505
-22.936
-17.505
-12.340
-6.652
-12.340
-6.652
-11.362
-9.361
-11.362
-9.361
-0.8191
2.9911
-0.8191
2.9911
-1.8927
2.0561
-1.8927
2.0561
-3.8005
-4.7400
-3.8005
-4.7400
-11.9186
-14.6527
-11.9186
-14.6527
-17.1030
-11.9161
-17.1030
-11.9161
-2.3453
1.2015
-2.3453
1.2015
-9.3528
-7.3187
-9.3528
-7.3187
14.011
11.427
14.011
11.427
0.130
4.136
0.130
4.136
3.147
5.275
3.147
5.275
-4.820
-7.632
-4.820
-7.632
-11.270
-6.327
-11.270
-6.327
7.650
9.055
7.650
9.055
-7.343
-5.276
-7.343
-5.276
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
NAT'L
AK
AL
AL
AL
AR
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
020
Oil
012
014
001
100
300
001
004
014
019
036
061
020
020
Oil
Oil
012
012
014
001
001
100
300
300
001
001
004
004
014
019
019
036
036
061
061
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
729
941
7
12
3
9
3
4
4
8
17
10
4
3
24
14
11
11
2
11
15
9
10
10
14
-100
-100
-25
-39
13
2
-6
-30
-5
-11
-57
-22
-12
-25
-21
-16
-16
-31
9
-18
-17
-15
-21
-69
-17
-9
-10
-21
-21
13
3
-6
-23
-5
-3
-14
-3
9
-25
-9
-9
-2
-12
9
-12
-9
-5
-13
-8
-14
-2
-4
-7
-10
16
5
1
-3
-4
-2
-7
6
44
-15
2
-2
1
1
11
2
-2
-4
-7
1
-4
1
-3
-8
-10
17
11
-1
-0
-3
-1
-11
25
42
-9
1
-3
4
4
11
25
-3
3
-6
-0
-5
6
1
-0
-2
23
24
3
22
-2
-2
-3
41
75
13
11
3
11
26
12
4
2
2
3
7
-1
302
292
10
24
23
28
3
35
-0
17
2
151
94
13
19
6
44
52
12
301
8
40
8
65
9
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
CO
CT
DC
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
001
001
001
001
003
004
006
Oil
012
013
016
017
018
020
039
010
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
003
004
006
Oil
012
013
016
017
018
020
020
039
010
010
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
14
20
9
11
7
7
3
8
12
4
4
6
8
6
4
4
7
4
4
4
15
19
-95
-23
-13
-58
-8
-7
-6
-1
-8
-14
-8
-12
-12
-30
-16
-12
-10
-21
-9
-6
-21
-3
-12
-9
-10
-14
-7
-7
-6
-0
-6
-13
-7
-9
-10
-13
-15
-8
-9
-9
-8
-5
-1
2
-6
-4
-6
-9
5
1
-4
1
-3
-10
-4
-5
-8
-9
-13
-4
-3
4
-8
-1
6
6
-12
-3
-6
-11
17
1
-5
1
-3
-11
-1
-6
-6
-8
-8
-5
-3
-1
-7
-1
7
9
-1
-1
-2
0
41
4
-4
2
-2
-8
6
-3
-4
-3
-1
-3
-0
7
-5
3
16
12
14
36
1
22
81
14
-4
5
3
-8
13
0
9
13
10
-1
6
8
-2
5
37
52
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
HI 120 120 1999
120 2000
IA 001 001 1999
IA 002 002 1999
IA 003 003 1999
003 2000
ID 001 001 1999
001 2000
IL 001 001 1999
001 2000
IL 003 003 1999
003 2000
IN 001 001 1999
001 2000
IN 008 008 1999
008 2000
KS 001 001 1999
001 2000
KY 001 001 1999
001 2000
KY 002 002 1999
002 2000
LA 001 001 1999
001 2000
MA 001 001 1999 13 -15 -8 -4 5 13 74
4
8
3
4
3
8
19
12
7
17
5
10
22
25
7
8
13
11
16
12
3
4
17
20
-36
-50
-20
-14
-36
-17
-40
-25
-5
-12
-16
-10
-14
-64
-10
-13
-8
-15
-63
-7
-10
-12
-23
-45
-29
-40
-20
-12
-36
-15
-12
-20
9
-6
8
-4
-8
-7
-4
-1
-3
-13
-4
-6
-10
-7
-14
-13
-13
-28
-17
-4
-24
-13
-7
-7
20
-1
8
2
-3
-4
1
3
4
-8
-1
-4
-7
-3
-10
-9
-9
-28
-13
-2
-26
-13
-6
-9
19
2
14
15
14
-5
0
2
12
-7
-1
-1
-7
-3
-10
-10
11
-16
-2
8
-17
-11
4
0
31
9
33
9
2
2
8
7
24
-1
8
4
-4
1
-7
-5
27
-3
-2
14
-17
-10
33
7
44
19
39
146
302
18
10
9
54
1
26
16
-4
3
11
8
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
MA 001 001 2000 20 -20 -4 8 36 20 292
MD 001 001 1999
001 2000
ME 001 001 1999
001 2000
MI 001 001 1999
001 2000
MN 001 001 1999
001 2000
MO 001 001 1999
001 2000
MO 002 002 1999
002 2000
MO 003 003 1999
003 2000
MO 004 004 1999
004 2000
MS 100 100 1999
100 2000
MT 001 001 1999
001 2000
MT 033 033 2000
MT 037 037 2000
NC 001 001 1999
001 2000
1
12
11
11
22
22
8
17
3
12
4
4
4
4
8
4
13
15
3
3
4
3
14
28
9
-28
-2
-14
-31
-13
-49
-54
-78
-8
-14
-16
-8
-13
-31
-15
-45
-27
-9
-8
-7
-28
-12
-8
9
-11
-0
-5
-10
-7
-15
-8
-78
-7
-10
-13
-8
-12
-21
-13
-5
-12
-9
-8
-3
-28
-5
-4
9
-2
8
0
-5
-4
-4
-3
-35
-5
-6
-8
-6
-9
2
-9
-1
-7
-3
3
7
-2
-3
-2
9
-4
10
1
-5
-2
-3
8
-38
-3
-5
-9
-3
-9
-1
-8
4
-7
-4
-1
9
-5
-2
-1
9
2
12
8
4
1
13
5
-2
0
0
-5
2
-7
6
-4
1
-1
1
3
22
15
4
0
9
9
56
14
18
22
36
126
-2
6
6
-4
10
-7
53
-0
116
8
1
3
29
15
6
42
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
NC 002 002 2000 8 -4-20-0 14
NC 003 003 1999 11 -8-5-2-2 0 4
NC 004 004 1999 3 -1-1 1 1 3 3
ND 001 001 1999
001 2000
NE 001 001 1999
001 2000
NH 001 001 1999
001 2000
NJ 001 001 1999
001 2000
NM 001 001 1999
001 2000
NM 002 002 1999
002 2000
NM 006 006 2000
NM 007 007 2000
NV 200 200 1999
200 2000
NV 300 300 1999
300 2000
NY 001 001 1999
001 2000
OH 001 001 1999 8 -9-6-30 6 17
10
8
4
8
6
8
15
20
3
6
8
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
10
34
-21
-47
-43
-39
-23
-12
-12
-38
-9
-29
-22
-12
-17
-17
-23
-19
-16
-26
-23
-26
-7
-18
-34
-26
11
-10
-2
-3
-9
-2
-13
-10
-11
-12
-16
-17
-13
-13
-11
-13
10
-8
-16
-19
27
-0
1
-1
1
16
-12
-3
-1
-5
-6
-6
-8
-13
-7
-5
6
-11
-19
-18
19
5
6
3
3
10
-12
-3
-4
-7
-9
-7
-9
-12
15
2
21
-3
-5
-10
36
2
8
4
17
23
-9
4
3
-1
-2
2
-5
-5
13
-2
28
14
-2
0
37
69
58
101
17
36
-8
5
4
0
-0
2
-3
-1
156
204
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
OH 002 002 2000 2 -2 -2 10 10 22 22
OH 004 004 2000 2 -7 -7 2 2 12 12
OH 006 006 1999
006 2000
OH 007 007 2000
OH 008 008 1999
008 2000
OH 009 009 1999
009 2000
OH 010 010 1999
010 2000
OH 012 012 1999
012 2000
OH 013 013 1999
013 2000
OH 015 015 1999
015 2000
OH 016 016 1999
016 2000
OK 101 101 1999
101 2000
OK 106 106 2000
OR 001 001 1999
001 2000
6
3
4
5
9
6
11
5
2
3
4
3
4
4
3
8
4
10
12
7
16
19
-85
-5
-7
-7
-11
-5
-13
-37
-98
-16
-28
-7
-13
-1
-3
-4
-13
-22
-20
-11
-60
-43
-4
-5
-3
0
-2
5
-7
-2
-98
-16
-19
-7
-12
0
-3
-2
-8
-19
-15
-7
-13
-26
6
-4
1
7
-0
8
-4
-1
-48
-1
-7
-1
-3
5
-2
4
-1
-13
-13
-4
-7
-15
-4
-0
-0
4
-0
16
-2
-4
-48
-3
-10
-0
1
8
5
5
-3
-15
-13
-5
-11
-17
24
9
2
7
3
26
0
-0
1
8
-2
8
14
15
21
12
2
-11
-11
-2
-4
-8
27
9
4
15
7
54
23
19
1
8
1
8
22
22
21
18
3
-6
-3
-0
6
0
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
PA
PA
PA
PR
RI
SC
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
UT
001
002
003
001
001
001
001
001
002
003
004
005
001
822
001
001
001
002
002
003
003
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
003
004
005
001
001
822
001
001
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
11
15
4
10
4
6
6
9
8
7
15
16
10
7
3
7
8
4
8
12
39
3
12
16
-15
-21
-14
-13
-10
-12
-19
-28
-5
-84
-13
-16
-13
-100
-3
-33
-7
1
-8
-23
-45
-36
-100
-16
-7
-6
-12
-3
-9
-4
-13
-18
1
-6
-10
-6
-5
-27
-3
-18
-2
3
-4
-7
-20
-36
-21
-11
-5
-4
-6
-0
-7
-1
-10
-17
6
-3
-7
-5
10
-15
-2
-7
0
6
1
-4
-14
-8
4
-2
-4
-5
-7
-2
-1
-1
-12
-15
9
-8
-2
-5
17
-24
6
-8
1
20
1
-2
-14
-14
7
-2
3
-1
-2
1
7
1
-10
-10
18
8
-0
-4
25
0
23
-1
4
36
5
6
-5
2
11
7
13
1
-2
4
18
11
-7
-6
26
24
64
3
83
1
23
16
11
66
7
15
6
2
226
14
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
VA 001 001 1999
001 2000
VI 001 001 1999
VT 001 001 1999
001 2000
WA 001 001 1999
001 2000
WI 001 001 1999
001 2000
WV 001 001 1999
001 2000
WV 002 002 1999
002 2000
WY 001 001 1999
001 2000
15
18
3
3
8
14
19
20
30
9
10
2
7
3
2
-51
-22
-4
-13
-20
-40
-11
-38
-22
-12
-12
-9
-16
-8
-24
-11
-8
-4
-13
-11
-7
-7
-2
-8
-2
-7
-9
-12
-8
-24
-4
-4
3
-3
-7
-3
-4
2
-5
5
-2
11
-6
10
-9
-7
-4
11
-5
-8
-7
3
7
-1
4
-3
11
-8
6
-9
6
-1
33
2
-5
-1
3
8
-1
6
3
31
-5
17
6
17
9
33
2
3
0
106
98
104
28
6
31
-4
17
6
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
NAT'L
AK
AL
AL
AL
AR
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
020
Oil
012
014
001
100
300
001
004
014
019
036
061
020
020
Oil
Oil
012
012
014
001
001
100
300
300
001
001
004
004
014
019
019
036
036
061
061
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
579
773
2
3
3
7
3
4
4
8
17
8
4
3
16
11
10
9
2
9
12
9
8
10
13
-78
-58
-0
-12
13
2
-6
-30
-5
-11
-57
-22
-12
-25
-21
-16
-16
-31
9
-18
-17
-15
-21
-69
-17
-7
-8
-0
-12
13
2
-6
-23
-5
-3
-14
4
9
-25
-9
-4
-2
-12
9
-1
-8
-5
-12
-8
-10
-2
-3
5
-8
16
3
1
-3
-4
-2
-7
13
44
-15
6
1
0
2
11
2
-2
-4
-3
1
-3
1
-2
5
-8
17
6
-1
-0
-3
-1
-11
34
42
-9
3
-1
-0
8
11
-1
-3
3
-5
-0
-4
6
1
10
-5
23
5
3
22
-2
-2
-3
54
75
13
13
4
3
26
12
4
4
2
4
7
-1
156
204
10
-5
23
25
3
35
-0
17
2
151
94
13
19
6
12
52
12
6
8
40
8
65
9
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
CO
CT
DC
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
001
001
001
001
003
004
006
Oil
012
013
016
017
018
020
039
010
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
003
004
006
Oil
012
013
016
017
018
020
020
039
010
010
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
9
13
8
9
6
6
3
7
11
4
3
6
8
6
3
4
7
3
3
3
15
19
-15
-13
-13
-58
-8
-7
-6
-0
-8
-14
-8
-12
-12
-30
-16
-12
-10
-21
-9
-6
-21
-3
-10
-4
-9
-11
-7
-7
-6
-0
-7
-13
-8
-9
-10
-13
-16
-8
-9
-21
-9
-6
-1
2
-6
-3
-6
-9
6
-1
-4
1
-3
-10
-7
-5
-8
-9
-13
-4
-3
2
-8
-4
6
6
-6
-1
-6
-12
20
-2
-5
1
-3
-11
-5
-6
-6
-8
-6
-5
-3
-4
-8
-3
7
9
-1
3
-2
-1
41
1
-4
2
-2
-8
-0
-3
-4
-3
10
-3
-0
8
-8
1
16
12
6
36
1
0
81
4
-4
5
3
-8
-0
0
9
13
10
-1
6
8
-8
1
37
52
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
IA 001 001 1999 2 -17 -17 -9 -9 -2 -2
IA 002 002 1999 2 -10-10 2 2 14 14
IA 003 003 1999
003 2000
ID 001 001 1999
001 2000
IL 001 001 1999
001 2000
IL 003 003 1999
003 2000
IN 001 001 1999
001 2000
IN 008 008 1999
008 2000
KS 001 001 1999
001 2000
KY 001 001 1999
001 2000
KY 002 002 1999
002 2000
LA 001 001 1999
001 2000
MA 001 001 1999
001 2000
MD 001 001 1999
1
7
11
9
5
17
5
10
18
23
7
8
9
10
16
11
3
4
17
18
10
17
-17
-17
-14
-25
-5
-12
-16
-10
-14
-12
-10
-13
-8
-15
-63
-7
-10
-12
-23
-19
-13
-12
-17
-14
-7
-8
9
-6
8
-4
-8
-7
-4
-1
-3
-10
-4
-6
-10
-7
-14
-13
-8
-4
-17
-11
-2
-4
9
-1
8
2
-4
-4
1
3
-2
-6
-1
-3
-7
-3
-10
-9
-1
7
-17
-13
-2
-5
15
2
14
15
-3
-2
0
2
9
-6
-1
0
-7
-3
-10
-9
2
11
-17
-11
4
1
20
9
33
9
1
4
8
7
15
-1
8
6
-4
1
-7
-5
13
17
-17
-10
9
7
44
19
39
146
7
18
10
9
54
1
26
16
-4
3
11
4
26
83
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
MD 001 001 2000 12 -28-11 -2 -4 2 9
ME 001 001 1999
001 2000
MI 001 001 1999
001 2000
MN 001 001 2000
MO 001 001 1999
001 2000
MO 002 002 1999
002 2000
MO 003 003 1999
003 2000
MO 004 004 1999
004 2000
MS 100 100 1999
100 2000
MT 001 001 1999
001 2000
MT 033 033 2000
MT 037 037 2000
NC 001 001 1999
001 2000
NC 002 002 2000 8 -4-20 -0
NC 003 003 1999 9 -8 -5 -2 -2
9
9
16
22
5
3
12
4
4
4
4
8
4
13
15
2
3
3
2
14
28
-2
-14
-17
-13
-41
-78
-8
-14
-16
-8
-13
-31
-15
-45
-27
-9
-8
-7
-2
-12
-8
-0
-5
-7
-7
-4
-78
-7
-10
-13
-8
-12
-21
-13
-5
-12
-9
-8
-7
-2
-5
-4
3
3
-3
-4
-3
-35
-5
-6
-8
-6
-9
2
-9
-1
-7
-6
3
0
7
-3
-2
10
2
-2
-2
15
-38
-3
-5
-9
-3
-9
-1
-8
4
-7
-6
-1
2
7
-2
-1
11
8
4
1
-2
-2
0
0
-5
2
-7
6
-4
1
-1
-3
3
14
15
4
0
56
14
18
22
125
-2
6
6
-4
10
-7
53
-0
116
8
-3
3
14
15
6
42
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
NC 004 004 1999 3 -1-1 1 1 3 3
ND 001 001 1999
001 2000
NE 001 001 1999
001 2000
NH 001 001 1999
001 2000
NJ 001 001 1999
001 2000
NM 001 001 1999
NM 002 002 1999
002 2000
NM 006 006 2000
NM 007 007 2000
NV 200 200 1999
200 2000
NV 300 300 1999
300 2000
NY 001 001 1999
001 2000
OH 001 001 1999 8 -9-6-30 6 17
OH 002 002 2000 2 -2 -2 10 10 22 22
OH 004 004 2000 2 -7 -7 2 2 12 12
4
2
2
4
1
4
12
17
2
3
1
2
4
2
2
3
3
6
30
-21
-8
-24
-19
32
-11
-12
-38
1
-13
-9
-17
-17
-3
-14
-16
-13
-8
-26
-0
-8
-24
-19
32
-10
-3
-2
1
-13
-9
-17
-12
-3
-14
-16
-13
-7
-10
23
-7
-16
-14
32
-5
0
-1
9
-10
-9
-7
-5
-2
-6
-6
-5
9
-5
13
-7
-16
-14
32
-4
1
3
9
-10
-9
-7
-7
-2
-6
-8
-6
34
3
27
-6
-8
-10
32
2
7
1
17
-8
-9
4
-1
-0
2
-3
-1
47
-2
28
-6
-8
-9
32
3
19
101
17
-8
-9
4
0
-0
2
-3
-1
156
204
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
OH 006 006 1999
006 2000
OH 007 007 2000
OH 008 008 1999
008 2000
OH 009 009 1999
009 2000
OH 010 010 1999
010 2000
OH 012 012 1999
012 2000
OH 013 013 1999
013 2000
OH 015 015 1999
015 2000
OH 016 016 1999
016 2000
OK 101 101 1999
101 2000
OK 106 106 2000
OR 001 001 1999
001 2000
PA 001 001 1999
001 2000
PA 002 002 1999 4 -14 -12 -6 -7 -2 -2
5
3
4
5
9
5
8
5
1
3
3
3
4
4
3
8
4
6
12
6
10
9
11
14
-4
-5
-7
-7
-11
-5
-7
-37
1
-16
-28
-7
-13
-1
-3
-4
-13
-21
-20
-7
-13
-28
-15
-21
2
-5
-3
0
-2
5
-6
-2
1
-16
-28
-7
-12
0
-3
-2
-8
-13
-15
-6
-10
-13
-7
-6
11
-4
1
7
-0
6
-2
-1
1
-1
-5
-1
-3
5
-2
4
-1
-13
-13
-3
-6
-11
-5
-4
12
-0
-0
4
-0
8
0
-4
1
-3
-11
-0
1
8
5
5
-3
-14
-13
-4
-7
-10
-4
-5
24
9
2
7
3
10
2
-0
1
8
1
8
14
15
21
12
2
-11
-11
-2
-5
-5
3
-1
27
9
4
15
7
26
23
19
1
8
1
8
22
22
21
18
3
-11
-3
-0
-3
0
13
1
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
PA 002 002 2000 10 -13 -3 -0-2 14
PA
PR
RI
SC
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
UT
VA
003
001
001
001
001
001
002
003
004
005
001
822
001
001
003
003
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
001
002
003
004
005
001
001
822
001
001
001
001
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
4
5
5
4
6
5
12
15
10
2
3
7
8
4
8
10
32
3
5
10
9
18
-10
-12
-19
-18
-5
-6
-10
-13
-13
0
-3
-33
-7
1
-8
-23
-45
-36
1
-13
-47
-22
-9
-4
-13
-18
-0
-4
-9
-6
-5
0
-3
-18
-2
3
-4
-9
-19
-36
2
-11
-5
-8
-7
-3
-11
-18
12
-3
-5
-5
10
1
-2
-7
0
6
1
-5
-10
-8
7
1
-3
-4
-1
-1
-12
-15
10
0
1
-5
17
1
6
-8
1
20
1
-5
-12
-14
6
-0
-3
-4
7
1
-10
-13
18
5
0
-4
25
1
23
-1
4
36
5
0
-3
2
9
9
6
-1
18
11
-7
-8
26
8
64
3
83
1
23
16
11
66
7
8
6
2
13
14
17
9
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
VI 001 001 1999 2 -4 -4 -0-0 33
VT 001 001 1999
001 2000
WA 001 001 1999
001 2000
WI 001 001 1999
001 2000
WV 001 001 1999
001 2000
WV 002 002 1999
002 2000
WY 001 001 1999
001 2000
2
4
11
17
15
22
9
10
2
7
2
1
-3
-7
-13
-11
-38
-10
-12
-12
-9
-16
10
6
-3
-6
-7
-7
-3
-8
-2
-7
-9
-12
10
6
-0
-5
-3
-5
1
-4
5
-2
11
-6
14
6
-0
-3
-4
-3
5
2
4
-3
11
-8
14
6
2
-0
-1
-0
6
1
6
3
31
-5
17
6
2
3
-0
10
98
104
28
6
31
-4
17
6
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
State Year Site
CT 1999 090010010
090031003
090091123
090092123
CT 2000 090011123
090012124
090031018
090090018
MA 1999 250092006
250230004
250250002
250250027
250270020
MA 2000 250130008
250130016
250132007
250250042
250272004
ME 1999 230031011
230050027
230110016
230190002
ME 2000 230010011
230030013
230052003
NH 1999 330111007
330130003
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
1
2
3
4
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
3
2
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
1
2
3
4
1
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
3
3
3
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region
1
State Year
NH 2000
RI
RI
VT
VT
NJ
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
NJ
2000
NY
1999
Site
330070014
330150009
330190003
440070022
440071010
440070020
440071005
500210002
500070007
500230005
340030003
340070003
340130011
340390004
340171003
340172002
340218001
340270004
340273001
360050083
360290005
360470011
360556001
360590008
360671015
360810094
360850067
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
1
3
3
3
3
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
2
3
4
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
State Year Site
NY 2000 360010005
360290002
360310003
360556001
360590013
360610056
360610062
360893001
361010003
PR 1999 720570008
721270003
PR 2000 720210009
720530003
720590016
VI 1999 780010012
DC 1999 110010041
110010043
DC 2000 110010042
110010043
DE 1999 100031003
100031007
DE 2000 100010002
100010003
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
4
1
3
3
3
4
3
4
2
1
4
4
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
2
4
1
4
3
3
4
3
4
2
1
4
4
MD
1999 245100040
MD
2000 240032002
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region
3
3
3
3
3
State Year Site
MD 2000 240053001
240430009
245100035
PA 1999 420030064
420031301
420170012
420430401
420950025
421010004
421010136
421290008
421330008
PA 2000 420030008
420030021
420030116
420110009
420692006
420710007
420791101
421010020
421010047
VA 1999 510590030
511071005
517600020
517750010
518100008
VA 2000 510130020
510595001
510870014
516500004
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
3
4
3
3
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
4
4
3
5
4
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region State Year Site
VA
wv
2000
1999
WV
2000
AL
1999
AL
2000
FL
1999
517700014
540391005
540610003
540690008
540890001
540030003
540110006
540291004
540511002
541071002
010730023
011010007
011250003
011270002
010690002
010735002
010890014
011130001
011190002
011210002
120111002
120251016
120256001
120570030
120571075
120951004
120992003
121030018
121031008
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
4
4
3
2
2
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
4
4
3
2
2
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region State Year Site
FL
FL
1999
2000
GA
1999
GA
2000
KY
1999
KY
2000
121111002
120170005
120310098
120310099
120830003
120952002
121056006
121171002
121275002
130510017
130510091
131270004
132450005
132450091
130210007
130210012
130950007
132150001
132150011
210190017
210370003
211110043
211170007
211950002
210470006
210590014
211010006
211110044
211451004
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
2
4
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
2
4
3
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region
4
4
4
4
4
State Year Site
MS 1999 280010004
280490018
281210001
281490004
MS 2000 280110001
280490010
280750003
281230001
NC 1999 370210034
370350004
370710016
371190010
371190034
371190040
371190041
371210001
371730002
NC 2000 370010002
370330001
370370004
370630001
370670022
370670024
370810009
370811005
371350007
SC 1999 450630008
450790007
450790019
450830010
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
4
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
4
4
2
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
1
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region
4
4
4
5
5
5
State Year Site
SC 2000 450370001
450450009
450470003
450730001
TN 1999 470930028
471130004
471570014
471570047
TN 2000 470370023
470370036
470650031
470654002
IL 1999 170310014
170311016
170313301
170314201
171670012
IL 2000 170310022
170310050
170310052
170434002
170971007
170990007
171110001
171971002
IN 1999 180190005
180431004
180891003
180891016
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
2
2
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
Region
5
5
5
5
5
State Year Site
IN 1999 180892004
180970043
180970081
181270024
IN 2000 180890006
180890022
180950009
180970078
180970079
181410014
181412004
181630006
181630016
MI 1999 260050003
260210014
260810020
260990009
261390005
261470005
261630015
261630036
MI 2000 260050003
260210014
260490021
260650012
261250001
261630001
MN 1999 271230868
271377001
271377550
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
2
4
4
3
4
3
3
2
3
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
2
4
4
3
5
3
3
2
3
3
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
10
Region State Year Site
5 MN 2000 270376018
270530961
270531007
270532006
271230871
271390505
5 OH 1999 390350060
390350066
390490024
390490025
390610014
390617001
390851001
390950024
390990005
391130014
391130031
391450013
391530017
391530023
391550007
5 OH 2000 390170003
390350013
390350027
390350045
390610041
390618001
390811001
390851001
390870010
390932003
390950026
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
4
4
3
2
3
4
4
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
3
2
4
2
4
4
2
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
4
4
3
2
3
4
4
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
3
2
4
2
4
4
2
3
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
11
Region
5
5
5
6
6
6
State Year Site
OH 2000 391330002
391351001
391510017
391550007
WI 1999 550590019
550790010
550790043
550790050
550790051
550790059
WI 2000 550090005
550090026
550710007
550790026
550790099
550870009
550890008
551390011
AR 1999 050510002
051190003
051310008
051430003
AR 2000 050350004
050910004
051070001
051190007
051191008
LA 1999 220330009
220511001
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
2
4
4
4
4
1
4
3
3
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
2
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
4
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
12
Region
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
State Year Site
LA 1999 220710010
221210001
LA 2000 220171002
220190009
220470009
220550005
220710012
NM 1999 350010023
350010024
350130017
NM 2000 350010023
350131006
350439003
350439004
350450006
OK 1999 400310648
401090035
401210415
401430110
OK 2000 400219002
400710602
400719003
401010169
401091037
401430131
TX 1999 480290034
481130035
481130050
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
2
1
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
4
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
2
1
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
13
Region
6
6
7
7
7
State Year Site
TX 1999 481410037
481410044
481671005
482011035
484393006
484530020
TX 2000 480290052
480370004
480550062
481410010
481410038
481670053
481830001
482010058
482010062
482450022
483390089
483611001
484530021
IA 1999 191032001
191130036
191532510
IA 2000 191390015
191630015
191630018
KS 1999 200910007
201070002
201730010
202090022
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
4
3
2
2
2
4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
5
3
2
2
2
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
14
Region
7
7
7
State Year Site
KS 2000 201730009
201770011
202090021
MO 1999 290950036
290952002
291831002
291895001
295100086
MO 2000 290910003
290952002
290990012
291860006
291892003
295100085
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
NE
NE
1999
2000
311090022
310790003
311090022
CO
1999
080010001
080310002
080410011
080770003
081230006
CO
2000
080050005
080130012
080410011
080690009
081010012
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
15
Region State Year Site
MT
MT
ND
ND
SD
SD
UT
UT
1999 300630024
2000 300470028
300530018
300870307
1999 380150003
380171004
380570004
2000 380350004
380910001
1999 461030014
461030016
461030017
461031001
2000 460110002
460990006
460990007
1999 490353006
490494001
490570001
2000
490350003
490353007
490490002
490570007
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
2
1
3
2
3
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
2
1
3
2
3
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
WY
WY
1999
560330002
2000 560210001
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
16
Region
9
State Year
AZ 1999
AZ
CA
2000
1999
CA
2000
Site
040070008
040139991
040139992
040139997
040190011
040191028
060170011
060190008
060250005
060271003
060290012
060290014
060310004
060370002
060531002
060590001
060631008
060652002
060658001
060670006
060670010
060731007
060750005
060850004
061010003
061112002
060011001
060231002
060251003
060290010
060290012
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
3
1
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
2
4
2
3
4
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
4
3
4
4
4
4
2
4
1
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
3
1
3
4
3
4
4
5
4
2
4
2
3
4
2
2
2
3
2
5
2
4
3
4
4
4
4
2
4
1
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
17
Region
9
9
9
9
9
10
State Year Site
CA 2000 060371002
060371103
060571001
060674001
060710306
060712002
060718001
060730003
060731002
060771002
060798001
060831007
060852003
061110007
061131003
HI 1999 150031001
HI 2000 150031004
150032004
NV 1999 320030560
320310016
NV 2000 320030298
320032002
320310016
AK 1999 020200018
020900010
021100004
021700008
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
4
4
2
2
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
4
4
2
2
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
2
1
2
2
10
AK
2000
020200018
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread
by Region/State/Site
18
Region State Year Site
10 AK 2000 020200044
021100004
021100026
10 ID 1999 160010011
160050015
160170001
160270004
160830006
10 ID 2000 160550006
160690009
160790017
10 OR 1999 410170113
410390060
410510080
410590121
10 OR 2000 410030013
410391007
410392013
410430009
410610117
410650007
10 WA 1999 530330021
530330057
530530031
530670013
530770012
10 WA 2000 530050002
530610005
Total Number
of Qtrs with
Pairs for
Bias
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
4
3
3
4
2
4
3
1
3
4
Total Num
of Pairs
for Bias
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
4
4
3
4
2
4
3
1
3
4
-------
Number of Pair and Number of Quarters over which Pairs Spread 19
by Region/State/Site
Total Number
of Qtrs with Total Num
Pairs for of Pairs
Region State Year Site Bias for Bias
10 WA 2000 530611007 4 4
530630047 4 4
530730015 4 4
-------
Attachment 6-2
1) National Bias Estimates
2) Bias Estimates by State/Reporting Organization
-------
Field Definitions for National Bias Estimates
This attachment provides bias estimates at the National level for CY99 and CYOO, by method designation and for all
methods.
The columns of the table are:
Methname: Method designation.
Year: Year.
Otmame: Quarter. "Ann" means annual.
Filetvpe: Bias estimates are generated using 4 different data bases. The data bases differ by whether pairs with
concentrations < 6 • g/m3 are excluded and whether pairs with percent differences > 50% or < -50% are excluded.
allgtO_l: all pairs are included in the bias estimate
allgt6_l: pairs with concentrations < 6 • g/m3 are excluded
bias50gtO_l: pairs with percent differences > 50% or -50% are excluded
bias50gt6_l: pairs with concentrations < 6 • g/m3 or with percent differences > 50% or -50% are excluded
Numbias: The number of pairs in bias estimate.
Lowercl: Lower 90% confidence limit for the bias estimate.
Avgbias: Bias estimate.
Uppercl: Upper 90% confidence limit for the bias estimate.
-------
Field Definitions for Bias Estimates by State/Reporting Organization
This attachment provides bias estimates at the Reporting Organization level for CY99 and CYOO, based on pairs
where both concentrations are greater than 6 • g/m3.
The columns of the table are:
State: State.
Rep Org: Reporting Organization.
Year: Year.
Number of Bias Pairs: Total number of pairs of PEP and routine data in the reporting organization for the calendar
year. Only pairs where both concentrations are greater than 6 • g/m3 are included in the count.
Min Bias: The minimum observed bias.
25th Rile: The 25th percentile of the observed biases.
Median Bias: The median of the observed biases.
Average Bias: The average of the observed biases.
75th Rile: The 75th percentile of the observed biases.
Max Bias: The maximum observed bias.
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
All
1999
All
1999
All
1999
All
1999
All
1999 Ann
All
2000
All
2000
All
2000
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
128
105
119
99
198
148
189
142
206
166
199
164
197
160
191
156
729
579
698
561
209
177
201
172
243
193
238
190
251
209
249
209
4.187
4.255
1.656
1.494
-2.839
-1.652
-3.742
-2.612
-4.526
-2.837
-4.176
-3.320
-5.101
-4.481
-4.331
-3.738
-0.742
-0.573
-3.104
-2.401
-3.399
- 1 . 880
-3.246
-2.319
-6.248
-4.414
-6.915
-5.149
-6.791
-6.124
-7.216
-6.124
10.4574
9 . 0670
4.2195
4 . 1609
0 . 8449
1 . 4604
-1.5911
-0.4463
-2.0485
-0.8080
-2.4229
-1.5733
-0.9826
-1.4292
-2.6998
-2.1507
1.2212
1.3910
-1.1410
-0.4367
-1.0192
0.3337
-1.8151
-0.9966
-2.7354
-1.2128
-5.3453
-3.6253
-4.8671
-4.8743
-5.8359
-4.8743
16.728
13.879
6.783
6.828
4.529
4.573
0.559
1.719
0.429
1.221
-0.670
0.173
3.135
1.623
- 1 . 068
-0.563
3.184
3.355
0.822
1.528
1.361
2.547
-0.384
0.325
0.777
1.988
-3.775
-2.102
-2.944
-3.624
-4.456
-3.624
All
2000
allgtO_l
238
-6.383 -3.1813
0.020
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
All
2000
All
2000 Ann
And Seq 1999 1
And Seq 1999 2
And Seq 1999 3
And Seq 1999 4
And Seq 1999
Ann
And Seq 2000 1
And Seq 2000 2
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
194
233
192
941
773
921
763
41
36
34
30
65
52
65
52
63
55
60
53
54
42
51
41
223
185
210
176
61
54
57
51
68
50
-4.817
-5.615
-4.614
-4.998
-4.225
-6.363
-5.242
15.039
13.928
7.959
7.307
0.421
1.485
0.421
1.485
-1.556
- 1 . 663
-3.459
-2.844
-7.813
-4.058
-1.435
-1.001
6.153
5.627
2.184
2.635
-2.479
1.096
-1.701
-0.140
-6.046
-1.395
-2.8600
-4.1336
-3.2450
-3.0356
-2.2620
-4.4009
-3.2791
25.4442
25.4853
13.1950
12.5787
4 . 5095
5.5016
4 . 5095
5.5016
3 . 6470
3 . 0786
0.5251
0.8572
4 . 5483
0 . 7900
1.9512
2.4959
8.1242
7 . 6003
4.1560
4.6091
2.8212
5.6279
1 . 2024
2.2827
3.4918
5.0187
-0.903
-2.653
-1.876
-1.073
-0.299
-2.438
-1.316
35.849
37.043
18.431
17.851
8.599
9.518
8.599
9.518
8.850
7.820
4.509
4.558
16.909
5.638
5.338
5.993
10.095
9.573
6.128
6.583
8.121
10.160
4.106
4.705
13.029
11.433
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
And Seq 2000 2
And Seq 2000 3
And Seq 2000 4
And Seq 2000 Ann
And Single 1999 4
And Single 1999 Ann
And Single 2000 1
And Single 2000 2
And Single 2000 3
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
bias50gtO_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
65
49
72
60
71
60
60
53
58
53
261
217
251
213
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
8
2
8
2
-4.
-0.
-4.
-3.
-4.
-3.
-8.
-2.
-4.
-2.
0.
0.
-2.
-1.
-147.
-147.
-147.
-147.
-34.
-76.
-20.
-76.
-75.
-75.
-21.
-16.
-21.
-16.
216
663
052
983
048
983
589
704
111
704
182
204
603
323
443
443
443
443
223
202
104
202
877
877
084
278
084
278
-0.
2.
0.
-1.
-1.
-1.
2.
0.
-1.
0.
2.
2.
-0.
0.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
19.
7.
3.
7.
-2.
-2.
-8.
-0.
-8.
-0.
,9497
,1323
,2837
,6671
,4824
,6671
,1901
,3260
,0424
,3260
,1508
,1755
,6331
,6486
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,9367
,6559
,0289
,1635
,0289
,7096
,7096
,4861
,9898
,4861
,9898
2,
4,
4,
0,
1,
0,
12,
3,
2,
3,
4,
4,
1,
2,
161,
161,
161,
161,
73,
90,
26,
90,
70,
70,
4,
14,
4,
14,
,317
,928
,619
,649
,083
,649
,969
,356
,027
,356
,120
,147
,337
,620
,316
,316
,316
,316
,534
,259
,431
,259
,458
,458
,112
,298
,112
,298
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
And Single 2000 4
And Single 2000 Ann
BGI Single 1999 1
BGI Single 1999 2
BGI Single 1999 3
BGI Single 1999 4
BGI Single 1999 Ann
BGI Single 2000 1
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
8
5
6
4
23
9
20
8
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
1
2
1
9
7
9
7
2
2
2
2
-46.
-58.
-33.
-46.
-1.
9.
-8.
-4.
-7.
-29.
-7.
-29.
-17.
-17.
-17.
-17.
-234.
-234.
-0.
-5.
-0.
-5.
-186.
-186.
-186.
-186.
278
897
260
146
997
330
998
978
014
036
014
036
131
131
131
131
763
763
388
297
388
297
135
135
135
135
-0.
19.
-11.
-7.
0.
11.
-6.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-0.
-1.
-0.
-1.
-1.
-1.
-1.
-1.
13.
-5.
13.
-5.
2.
-2.
2.
-2.
18.
18.
18.
18.
,0493
,0059
,8383
,4224
,0962
,9009
,8778
,2014
,9635
,9635
,9635
,9635
,5983
,4025
,5983
,4025
,1088
,1088
,1088
,1088
,8631
,7043
,8631
,7043
,1824
,1142
,1824
,1142
,6244
,6244
,6244
,6244
46.
96.
9.
31.
2.
14.
-4.
0.
5.
26.
5.
26.
14.
14.
14.
14.
262.
262.
4.
1.
4.
1.
223.
223.
223.
223.
,180
,909
,583
,301
,189
,471
,758
,575
,817
,231
,817
,231
,914
,914
,914
,914
,489
,489
,753
,068
,753
,068
,384
,384
,384
,384
BGI Single 2000 2
allgtO_l
-115.140 1.1099 117.360
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
BGI Single 2000 2
BGI Single 2000 3
BGI Single 2000 4
BGI Single 2000 Ann
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999
RP Seq
1999 Ann
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
7
7
7
7
74
60
72
60
117
89
108
83
130
102
126
102
131
109
128
106
452
360
-115.
-115.
-115.
-127.
-127.
-127.
-127.
-3.
-3.
-3.
-3.
-5.
-2.
-2.
-2.
-5.
-5.
-7.
-6.
-7.
-4.
-5.
-4.
-7.
-6.
-6.
-6.
-3.
-3.
140
140
140
358
358
358
358
837
837
837
837
459
812
793
812
970
459
098
695
659
882
756
882
119
709
760
093
898
775
1.
1.
1.
-30.
-30.
-30.
-30.
-6.
-6.
-6.
-6.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
-0.
-0.
-4.
-4.
-4.
-2.
-3.
-2.
-3.
-2.
-5.
-4.
-1.
-1.
,1099
,1099
,1099
,2109
,2109
,2109
,2109
,9200
,9200
,9200
,9200
,6546
,6546
,6546
,6546
,3025
,1640
,0352
,1640
,2142
,8910
,5655
,3232
,7589
,8797
,8140
,8797
,6201
,6418
,0799
,3770
,9327
,8087
117.
117.
117.
113.
113.
113.
113.
2.
2.
2.
2.
12.
3.
2.
3.
5.
3.
-2.
-1.
-1.
-0.
-1.
-0.
-0.
1.
-3.
-2.
0.
0.
,360
,360
,360
,518
,518
,518
,518
,528
,528
,528
,528
,064
,140
,863
,140
,542
,677
,033
,951
,859
,878
,872
,878
,121
,425
,399
,661
,033
,158
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
RP Seq
1999 Ann
2000 1
2000
2000
2000
2000 Ann
RP Single 1999 1
RP Single 1999 2
RP Single 1999 3
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
434
351
131
111
128
109
156
134
154
132
155
136
154
136
155
125
154
124
597
506
590
501
12
8
12
8
13
5
13
5
10
6
10
-5.701
-5.120
-6.058
-4.844
-5.044
-4.175
-8.147
-6.750
-8.492
-6.997
-7.847
-7.125
-8.026
-7.125
-7.194
-6.898
-6.746
-6.269
-6.855
-6.064
-7.484
-6.694
-3.560
-5.292
-3.560
-5.292
-15.572
-12.691
-15.572
-12.691
-10.826
-11.183
-10.826
-3.7358
-3.1529
-3.5052
-2.3264
-3.4242
-2.7635
-4.6755
-2.8705
-6.7381
-5.2496
-5.7254
-5.6422
-6.4496
-5.6422
-5.4441
-5.3130
-5.1124
-4.9000
-4.8908
-4.0995
-5.5195
-4.7288
4.4929
3.4610
4.4929
3.4610
-7.6132
2.4341
-7.6132
2.4341
-2.9774
- 1 . 0670
-2.9774
-1.770
-1.186
-0.952
0.191
- 1 . 804
-1.352
- 1 . 204
1.009
-4.985
-3.502
-3.604
-4.160
-4.873
-4.160
-3.694
-3.728
-3.479
-3.531
-2.927
-2.135
-3.556
-2.764
12.546
12.214
12.546
12.214
0.345
17.559
0.345
17.559
4.871
9.049
4.871
-------
National Bias Estimates based on 071101 Extractions
methname year qtrname filetype
numbias lowercl avgbias uppercl
RP Single 1999 3
bias50gt6_l
-11.183 -1.0670
9.049
RP Single 1999 4
RP Single 1999 Ann
RP Single 2000 1
RP Single 2000 2
RP Single 2000 3
RP Single 2000 4
RP Single 2000 Ann
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
allgtO_l
allgt6_l
bias50gtO_l
bias50gt6_l
8
6
8
6
43
25
43
25
11
8
11
8
14
7
14
7
15
10
15
10
13
9
13
9
53
34
53
34
-15.650
-5.445
-15.650
-5.445
-3.915
-0.024
-3.915
-0.024
-10.748
-14.755
-10.748
-14.755
-19.017
-21.673
-19.017
-21.673
-22.936
-17.505
-22.936
-17.505
-12.340
-6.652
-12.340
-6.652
-11.362
-9.361
-11.362
-9.361
-0.8191
2.9911
-0.8191
2.9911
-1.8927
2.0561
-1.8927
2.0561
-3.8005
-4.7400
-3.8005
-4.7400
-11.9186
-14.6527
-11.9186
-14.6527
-17.1030
-11.9161
-17.1030
-11.9161
-2.3453
1.2015
-2.3453
1.2015
-9.3528
-7.3187
-9.3528
-7.3187
14.011
11.427
14.011
11.427
0.130
4.136
0.130
4.136
3.147
5.275
3.147
5.275
-4.820
-7.632
-4.820
-7.632
-11.270
-6.327
-11.270
-6.327
7.650
9.055
7.650
9.055
-7.343
-5.276
-7.343
-5.276
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
NAT'L 1999
2000 773
AK 020 1999
2000
AL Oil 1999
2000
AL 012 1999
2000
AL 014 2000
AR 001 1999
2000
AZ 100 1999
AZ 300 1999
2000
CA 001 1999
2000
CA 004 1999
2000
CA 014 2000
CA 019 1999
2000
CA 036 1999
2000
CA 061 1999
2000
79
73
2
3
3
7
3
4
4
8
17
8
4
3
16
11
10
9
2
9
12
9
8
10
13
-78
-58
-0
-12
13
2
-6
-30
-5
-11
-57
-22
-12
-25
-21
-16
-16
-31
9
-18
-17
-15
-21
-69
-17
-7
-8
-0
-12
13
2
-6
-23
-5
-3
-14
4
9
-25
-9
-4
-2
-12
9
-1
-8
-5
-12
-8
-10
-2
-3
5
-8
16
3
1
-3
-4
-2
-7
13
44
-15
6
1
0
2
11
2
-2
-4
-3
1
-3
1
-2
5
-8
17
6
-1
-0
-3
-1
-11
34
42
-9
3
-1
-0
8
11
-1
-3
3
-5
-0
-4
6
1
10
-5
23
5
3
22
-2
-2
-3
54
75
13
13
4
3
26
12
4
4
2
4
7
-1
156
204
10
-5
23
25
3
35
-0
17
2
151
94
13
19
6
12
52
12
6
8
40
8
65
9
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
CO
CT
DC
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
001
001
001
001
003
004
006
Oil
012
013
016
017
018
020
039
010
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
9
13
8
9
6
6
3
7
11
4
3
6
8
6
3
4
7
3
3
3
15
19
-15
-13
-13
-58
-8
-7
-6
-0
-8
-14
-8
-12
-12
-30
-16
-12
-10
-21
-9
-6
-21
-3
-10
-4
-9
-11
-7
-7
-6
-0
-7
-13
-8
-9
-10
-13
-16
-8
-9
-21
-9
-6
-1
2
-6
-3
-6
-9
6
-1
-4
1
-3
-10
-7
-5
-8
-9
-13
-4
-3
2
-8
-4
6
6
-6
-1
-6
-12
20
-2
-5
1
-3
-11
-5
-6
-6
-8
-6
-5
-3
-4
-8
-3
7
9
-1
3
-2
-1
41
1
-4
2
-2
-8
-0
-3
-4
-3
10
-3
-0
8
-8
1
16
12
6
36
1
0
81
4
-4
5
3
-8
-0
0
9
13
10
-1
6
8
-8
1
37
52
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
IA 001 1999 2 -17 -17 -9 -9 -2 -2
IA 002 1999 2 -10-10 2 2 14 14
IA 003 1999
2000
ID 001 1999
2000
IL 001 1999
2000
IL 003 1999
2000
IN 001 1999
2000
IN 008 1999
2000
KS 001 1999
2000
KY 001 1999
2000
KY 002 1999
2000
LA 001 1999
2000
MA 001 1999
2000
MD 001 1999
1
7
11
9
5
17
5
10
18
23
7
8
9
10
16
11
3
4
17
18
10
17
-17
-17
-14
-25
-5
-12
-16
-10
-14
-12
-10
-13
-8
-15
-63
-7
-10
-12
-23
-19
-13
-12
-17
-14
-7
-8
9
-6
8
-4
-8
-7
-4
-1
-3
-10
-4
-6
-10
-7
-14
-13
-8
-4
-17
-11
-2
-4
9
-1
8
2
-4
-4
1
3
-2
-6
-1
-3
-7
-3
-10
-9
-1
7
-17
-13
-2
-5
15
2
14
15
-3
-2
0
2
9
-6
-1
0
-7
-3
-10
-9
2
11
-17
-11
4
1
20
9
33
9
1
4
8
7
15
-1
8
6
-4
1
-7
-5
13
17
-17
-10
9
7
44
19
39
146
7
18
10
9
54
1
26
16
-4
3
11
4
26
83
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
MD 001 2000 12 -28 -11 -2-4 29
ME 001 1999
2000
MI 001 1999
2000
MN 001 2000
MO 001 1999
2000
MO 002 1999
2000
MO 003 1999
2000
MO 004 1999
2000
MS 100 1999
2000
MT 001 1999
2000
MT 033 2000
MT 037 2000
NC 001 1999
2000
NC 002 2000 8 -4-20 -0
NC 003 1999 9 -8 -5 -2 -2
9
9
16
22
5
3
12
4
4
4
4
8
4
13
15
2
3
3
2
14
28
-2
-14
-17
-13
-41
-78
-8
-14
-16
-8
-13
-31
-15
-45
-27
-9
-8
-7
-2
-12
-8
-0
-5
-7
-7
-4
-78
-7
-10
-13
-8
-12
-21
-13
-5
-12
-9
-8
-7
-2
-5
-4
3
3
-3
-4
-3
-35
-5
-6
-8
-6
-9
2
-9
-1
-7
-6
3
0
7
-3
-2
10
2
-2
-2
15
-38
-3
-5
-9
-3
-9
-1
-8
4
-7
-6
-1
2
7
-2
-1
11
8
4
1
-2
-2
0
0
-5
2
-7
6
-4
1
-1
-3
3
14
15
4
0
56
14
18
22
125
-2
6
6
-4
10
-7
53
-0
116
8
-3
3
14
15
6
42
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
NC 004 1999 3 -1-1 1 1 3 3
ND 001 1999
2000
NE 001 1999
2000
NH 001 1999
2000
NJ 001 1999
2000
NM 001 1999
NM 002 1999
2000
NM 006 2000
NM 007 2000
NV 200 1999
2000
NV 300 1999
2000
NY 001 1999
2000
OH 001 1999 8 -9-6-30 6 17
OH 002 2000 2 -2 -2 10 10 22 22
OH 004 2000 2 -7 -7 2 2 12 12
4
2
2
4
1
4
12
17
2
3
1
2
4
2
2
3
3
6
30
-21
-8
-24
-19
32
-11
-12
-38
1
-13
-9
-17
-17
-3
-14
-16
-13
-8
-26
-0
-8
-24
-19
32
-10
-3
-2
1
-13
-9
-17
-12
-3
-14
-16
-13
-7
-10
23
-7
-16
-14
32
-5
0
-1
9
-10
-9
-7
-5
-2
-6
-6
-5
9
-5
13
-7
-16
-14
32
-4
1
3
9
-10
-9
-7
-7
-2
-6
-8
-6
34
3
27
-6
-8
-10
32
2
7
1
17
-8
-9
4
-1
-0
2
-3
-1
47
-2
28
-6
-8
-9
32
3
19
101
17
-8
-9
4
0
-0
2
-3
-1
156
204
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
OH 006 1999
2000
OH 007 2000
OH 008 1999
2000
OH 009 1999
2000
OH 010 1999
2000
OH 012 1999
2000
OH 013 1999
2000
OH 015 1999
2000
OH 016 1999
2000
OK 101 1999
2000
OK 106 2000
OR 001 1999
2000
PA 001 1999
2000
PA 002 1999 4 -14 -12 -6 -7 -2 -2
5
3
4
5
9
5
8
5
1
3
3
3
4
4
3
8
4
6
12
6
10
9
11
14
-4
-5
-7
-7
-11
-5
-7
-37
1
-16
-28
-7
-13
-1
-3
-4
-13
-21
-20
-7
-13
-28
-15
-21
2
-5
-3
0
-2
5
-6
-2
1
-16
-28
-7
-12
0
-3
-2
-8
-13
-15
-6
-10
-13
-7
-6
11
-4
1
7
-0
6
-2
-1
1
-1
-5
-1
-3
5
-2
4
-1
-13
-13
-3
-6
-11
-5
-4
12
-0
-0
4
-0
8
0
-4
1
-3
-11
-0
1
8
5
5
-3
-14
-13
-4
-7
-10
-4
-5
24
9
2
7
3
10
2
-0
1
8
1
8
14
15
21
12
2
-11
-11
-2
-5
-5
3
-1
27
9
4
15
7
26
23
19
1
8
1
8
22
22
21
18
3
-11
-3
-0
-3
0
13
1
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
PA 002 2000 10 -13 -3 -0-2 14
PA
PR
RI
SC
SD
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
UT
VA
003
001
001
001
001
001
002
003
004
005
001
822
001
001
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
1999
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
1999
2000
4
5
5
4
6
5
12
15
10
2
3
7
8
4
8
10
32
3
5
10
9
18
-10
-12
-19
-18
-5
-6
-10
-13
-13
0
-3
-33
-7
1
-8
-23
-45
-36
1
-13
-47
-22
-9
-4
-13
-18
-0
-4
-9
-6
-5
0
-3
-18
-2
3
-4
-9
-19
-36
2
-11
-5
-8
-7
-3
-11
-18
12
-3
-5
-5
10
1
-2
-7
0
6
1
-5
-10
-8
7
1
-3
-4
-1
-1
-12
-15
10
0
1
-5
17
1
6
-8
1
20
1
-5
-12
-14
6
-0
-3
-4
7
1
-10
-13
18
5
0
-4
25
1
23
-1
4
36
5
0
-3
2
9
9
6
-1
18
11
-7
-8
26
8
64
3
83
1
23
16
11
66
7
8
6
2
13
14
17
9
-------
Bias by Reporting Organization
for all bias pairs > 6 ug/m3, based on 071101 extraction
Rep Number of Min 25th Median Average 75th Max
State Org Year Bias Pairs Bias Ptile Bias Bias Ptile Bias
VI 001 1999 2 -4 -4 -0-0 33
VT 001 1999
2000
WA 001 1999
2000
WI 001 1999
2000
WV 001 1999
2000
WV 002 1999
2000
WY 001 1999
2000
2
4
11
17
15
22
9
10
2
7
2
1
-3
-7
-13
-11
-38
-10
-12
-12
-9
-16
10
6
-3
-6
-7
-7
-3
-8
-2
-7
-9
-12
10
6
-0
-5
-3
-5
1
-4
5
-2
11
-6
14
6
-0
-3
-4
-3
5
2
4
-3
11
-8
14
6
2
-0
-1
-0
6
1
6
3
31
-5
17
6
2
3
-0
10
98
104
28
6
31
-4
17
6
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-454/R-01-013
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Quality Assurance Report- Calendar Year 2000
The SLAMS PM2.5 Ambient Airs Monitoring Program
5. REPORT DATE
11/01
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Michael Papp, Shelly Eberly, Mark Schmidt
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Monitoring and Quality Assurance Group C339-02
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Director
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Office of Air and Radiation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/200/04
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This report documents the quality assurance activities that were undertaken for the SLAMS PM2.5 environmental
data operations for the calendar year January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 (CYOO), which was the second year
of implementation of the PM2 5 monitoring program. The QA Report evaluates the adherence to the quality
assurance requirements described in 40 CFR 58 App. A and evaluates the data quality indicators of precision,
accuracy, bias, and completeness.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Quality Assurance
Air Pollution control
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
20. SECURITY CLASS (Page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
------- |