Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Aldicarb 2007


 United States        Prevention, Pesticides  EPA
 Environmental Protection   and Toxic Substances  September 2007
 Agency           (7508P)
Reregistration
Eligibility Decision for
Aldicarb

-------
        Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document
                          for Aldicarb

                             List A

                       Case Number 0140
Approved by: 	   Date:  	
               Steven Bradbury, Ph.D.
               Director
               Special Review and Reregistration Division
                           Page 2 of 191

-------
                                   Table of Contents

Aldicarb Reregi strati on Eligibility Decision Team	5
Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations	6
Abstract	8
I. Introduction	9
II. Chemical Overview	11
  A. Chemical Identity	11
  B. Regulatory History	12
  C. Use and Usage Profile	12
  D. Tolerances	13
III. Aldicarb Human Health and Environmental Fate and Effects Risk Assessments	14
  A. Human Health	14
  B. Environmental Fate and Effects	14
IV. Risk Management, Reregi strati on Decision, and Tolerance Reassessment Decisions	18
  A. Determination of Reregistration Eligibility	18
  B. Public Comments and Responses	18
  C. Regulatory Position	19
     1. Food Quality Protection Act Findings	19
       a. "Risk Cup" Determination	19
       b. Determination of Safety to U.S. Population (Including Infants and Children)	19
       c. Endocrine Disrupter Effects	19
       d. Cumulative Risks	20
     2. Tolerance Summary	20
  D. Regulatory Rationale	22
     1. Human Health Risk Management and Mitigation	22
       a. Dietary Risk Mitigation (Food and Drinking Water)	22
       b. Aggregate Risk Mitigation	23
       c. Occupational Risk Mitigation	23
     2. Ecological Risk Management and Mitigation	23
       a. Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms	23
     3. Mitigation Summary and Crop-Specific Analyses	24
       Citrus	25
       Cotton	27
       Dry Bean	30
       Peanut	31
       Potato	34
       Soybean	36
       Sugar Beet	37
       Sweet Potato	40
     4. Other Labeling Requirements	41
     5. Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations	41
V. What Registrants Need to Do	43
  A. Manufacturing-Use Products	43
     1. Additional Generic Data Requirements	43
     2. Labeling for Manufacturing-Use Products	43
                                     Page 3 of 191

-------
B. End-Use Products	44
   1. Additional Product-Specific Data Requirements	44
  2. Labeling for End-Use Products	44
Appendix A. Aldicarb Uses and Use-Patterns Eligible for Reregi strati on	58
Appendix B. Table of Generic Data Requirements and Studies Used to Make the
Reregi strati on Decision	68
Appendix C. Technical Support Documents	75
Appendix D. Citations Considered to be Part of the Database Supporting the Reregi strati on
Decision (Bibliography)	77
Appendix E. Generic Data Call-In (GDCI)	183
Appendix F. Product-Specific Data Call-In (PDCI)	184
Appendix G. EPA's Batching of Aldicarb Products for Meeting Data Requirements for
Reregi strati on	185
Appendix H. List of Available Related Documents and Electronically Available Forms	187
                                  Page 4 of 191

-------
Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision Team

EPA Office of Pesticide Programs

Special Review and Reregistration Division

Sherrie Kinard
Anne Overstreet
Robert McNally

Health Effects Division

Jeff Dawson
Felicia Fort
Michael Metzger
Linda Taylor

Environmental Fate and Effects Division

Jonathan Angier
Tom Bailey
Jeanette Martinez
Dana Spatz

Biological and Economic Analysis Division

Derek Berwald
Angel Chiri
Colwell Cook
Arnet Jones
Monisha Kaul
Timothy Kiely
Istanbul Yusuf
Nicole Zinn

Registration  Division

Joanne Edwards
John Hebert
                                     PageS of 191

-------
Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations
AGDCI
ai
aPAD
BCF
CFR
cPAD
CSF
CSFII
DCI
DEEM
DFR
DNT
EC
EDWC
EEC
EPA
EUP
FDA
FIFRA
FFDCA
FQPA
GLN
IR
LD5
'50
LOC
LOAEL
MATC
mg/kg/day
mg/L
MOE
MRID

MUP
NOAEL
OPP
Agricultural Data Call-In
Active Ingredient
Acute Population Adjusted Dose
Bioconcentration Factor
Code of Federal Regulations
Chronic Population Adjusted Dose
Confidential Statement of Formulation
USDA Continuing Surveys for Food Intake by Individuals
Data Call-In
Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model
Dislodgeable Foliar Residue
Developmental Neurotoxicity
Emulsifiable Concentrate Formulation
Estimated Drinking Water Concentration
Estimated Environmental Concentration
Environmental Protection Agency
End-Use Product
Food and Drug Administration
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Food Quality Protection Act
Guideline Number
Index Reservoir
Median Lethal Concentration. A statistically derived concentration of a
substance that can be expected to cause death in 50% of test animals. It is
usually expressed as the weight of a substance per weight or volume of
water, air, or feed, e.g., mg/1, mg/kg, or ppm.
Median Lethal Dose. A statistically derived single dose that can be
expected to cause death in 50% of the test animals when administered by
the route indicated (oral, dermal, inhalation). It is expressed as a weight
of substance per unit weight of animal, e.g., mg/kg.
Level of Concern
Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level
Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration
Micrograms Per Gram
Micrograms Per Liter
Milligram Per Kilogram Per Day
Milligram Per Liter
Margin of Exposure
Master Record Identification Number. EPA's system for recording and
tracking studies submitted.
Manufacturing-Use Product
No Observed Adverse Effect Level
EPA Office of Pesticide Programs
                                    Page 6 of 191

-------
OPPTS
PAD
PCA
PDF
PHED
PHI
ppb
PPE
ppm
PRZM/EXAMS

Q*

RAC
RED
REI
RfD
RQ
SCI-GROW2
SAP
SF
SLC
TGAI
USDA
USGS
UF
UV
WPS
EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances
Population Adjusted Dose
Percent Crop Area
USDA Pesticide Data Program
Pesticide Handler's Exposure Data
Pre-harvest Interval
Parts Per Billion
Personal Protective Equipment
Parts Per Million
Pesticide Root Zone Mode/Exposure Analysis Modeling System, Tier II
Surface Water Computer Model
The Carcinogenic Potential of a Compound, Quantified by the EPA's
Cancer Risk Model
Raw Agriculture Commodity
Reregi strati on Eligibility Decision
Restricted-Entry Interval
Reference Dose
Risk Quotient
Tier I Ground Water Computer Model
Science Advisory Panel
Safety Factor
Single Layer Clothing
Technical Grade Active Ingredient
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Geological Survey
Uncertainty Factor
Ultraviolet
Worker Protection Standard
                                    Page 7 of 191

-------
Abstract

       This document presents the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's or the Agency's)
decision regarding the reregi strati on eligibility of the registered uses of the active ingredient
aldicarb. The Agency has conducted human health and environmental fate and effects risk
assessments for aldicarb and has assessed whether the aldicarb tolerances are safe from an
individual-chemical standpoint (considering all issues other than cumulative exposures to other
n-methyl carbamate pesticides).  The Agency has determined that, with label amendments and
changes as specified in this document, aldicarb can be used without resulting in unreasonable
adverse effects on the environment, and that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general U.S. population,  infants, children, or other major identifiable population
subgroups, from the use of aldicarb (considering all issues other than cumulative exposures to
other n-methyl carbamate pesticides). The Agency has therefore determined that products
containing the active ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregi strati on provided that the risk
mitigation measures outlined in this document are adopted and label amendments are made to
reflect these measures.

       EPA has identified potential human health risks of concern associated with the current
registered uses of aldicarb from drinking water exposure, and potential environmental risks of
concern to birds, mammals and fish.  To reduce these potential exposures and to address current
risks of concern, the Agency, in agreement with the technical registrant of aldicarb, will
implement label restrictions (increase drinking water well set-backs when certain criteria are
triggered) for application to peanuts in the southeastern coastal plains for ground water
contamination concerns. Additionally, application rate reductions, state limitations, application
restrictions, label amendments, and termination of certain uses will also be implemented to
reduce environmental concerns.  The Agency is also requiring appropriate data to confirm the
decisions presented in this Reregi strati on Eligibility Decision.
                                      Page 8 of 191

-------
I. Introduction

The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) was amended in 1988
to accelerate the reregi strati on of products with active ingredients registered prior to November
1, 1984. The amended Act calls for the development and submission of data to support the
reregi strati on of an active ingredient, as well as a review of all data submitted to the
Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter referred to as EPA or the Agency). Reregi strati on
involves a thorough review of the scientific database underlying a pesticide's registration. The
purpose of the Agency's review is to reassess the potential hazards arising from the currently
registered uses of a pesticide, to determine the need for additional data on health and
environmental effects, and to determine whether or not the pesticide meets the "no unreasonable
adverse effects" standard of FIFRA.

On August 3, 1996, the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) was signed into law. This
Act amended FIFRA and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to require
reassessment of all existing tolerances for pesticides in food. EPA decided that, for those
chemicals that have tolerances and are undergoing reregi strati on, tolerance reassessment would
be accomplished through the reregi strati on process. Under FQPA, in reassessing these
tolerances, the Agency must consider, among other things, aggregate risks from non-
occupational sources of pesticide exposure, whether there is increased susceptibility among
infants and children, and the cumulative effects of pesticides that have a common mechanism of
toxicity. In determining whether aldicarb tolerances can be reassessed as safe, the Agency has
concluded that the risks from aggregate exposure to aldicarb are acceptable, and that the
tolerances can be reassessed as safe if they are acceptable when viewed in light of the cumulative
assessment of n-methyl carbamate pesticides.

The intentional dosing human toxicity study (the Inveresk study) used in the human
health risk assessment for aldicarb has been reviewed by EPA's Human Studies Review Board,
as required by EPA's Human Subjects Protections rule. The Agency presented the Inveresk
study to the HSRB at a meeting on April 2-4, 2006. The HSRB discussed the study extensively
and concluded that the cholinesterase data from the aldicarb human study were reliable for use in
the aldicarb single chemical, aggregate risk assessment from both a science and ethical
standpoint. The final report of the HSRB is available at
http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/files/april2006mtgfinalreport62606.pdf

Risks summarized in this document are for aldicarb only. FQPA requires EPA to
consider available information concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's
residues and "other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity" when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance. Potential cumulative effects of chemicals
with a common mechanism of toxicity are considered because low-level exposure to multiple
chemicals causing a common toxic effect by a common mechanism could lead to the same
adverse health effect as would a higher level of exposure to any one of these individual
chemicals. Aldicarb is a member of the N-methyl carbamate class of pesticides. The Agency
has classified the N-methyl carbamate pesticides and their common degradates as having a
common mechanism of toxicity.
Page 9 of 191

-------
A cumulative risk assessment, which evaluates exposures based on a common
mechanism of toxicity, was conducted to evaluate risk from food, drinking water, residential use,
and other non-occupational exposures resulting from registered uses of N-methyl carbamate
pesticides, including aldicarb. EPA has concluded that the cumulative risks associated with the
N-methyl carbamate pesticides are below the Agency's level of concern. With this
determination, the Agency has concluded the reassessment process for aldicarb tolerances
mandated by section 408(q) of the FFDCA. For additional information, refer to the document,
Revised N-methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment, which is available in the EPA
docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0935 and on the website,
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/.

This document presents EPA's revised human health and environmental fate and effects
risk assessments, its progress toward tolerance reassessment, and the reregi strati on eligibility
decision for aldicarb. The document consists of six sections. Section I contains the regulatory
framework for reregi strati on and tolerance reassessment. Section II provides a description of the
chemical and a profile of the use and usage of the chemical. Section III references the revised
human health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments attached as Appendices to this
document. Section IV presents the Agency's risk management, reregi strati on eligibility, and
tolerance reassessment decisions. Section V summarizes the data requirements necessary to
confirm the reregi strati on eligibility decision as well as specific label changes and language
necessary to implement the risk mitigation measures outlined in Section IV. Section VI, the
Appendices, provides related information and supporting documents. The preliminary and
revised risk assessments for aldicarb are available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163
located on-line in the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at
http://www.regulations.gov.
Page 10 of 191

-------
II. Chemical Overview
A. Chemical Identity
Chemical Structure:
H,C
3 \
H
O
CH,

CH,
Empirical Formula:

Common Name:
C7H14N2O2S

Aldicarb
CAS Name: 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O- (methylcarbamoyl)oxime

CAS Registry Number: 116-06-3

OPP Chemical Code: 098301
Case Number:
0140
Technical Registrant: Bayer CropSciences
Degradates:
Aldicarb sulfoxide: 2-Methyl-2-(methylsulfmyl)propionaldehyde O-
(methyl carbamoyl) oxime, and Aldicarb sulfone: 2-Methyl-2-
(methylsulfonyl)propionaldehyde O-(methyl carbamoyl) oxime
The regulated residues are the combined residues of aldicarb and its two cholinesterase-
inhibiting metabolites, aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone. Aldicarb sulfoxide is considered
to have similar potency to the parent in terms of toxicity, while aldicarb sulfone is less potent.
Aldicarb and the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites are the residues of concern in both the
tolerance expression and the reregi strati on decision.

Aldicarb is registered for use as a systemic insecticide and nematicide on agricultural
crops. Aldicarb is absorbed by the root system, and is subsequently translocated throughout the
plant. Aldicarb is a restricted use pesticide and there are no aldicarb products intended for sale to
homeowners or for use in residential settings. Aldicarb is currently sold in the United States by
Bayer CropScience, the basic producer, under the trade name of Temik®.
Page 11 of 191

-------
B. Regulatory History

Aldicarb was first registered in 1970. Marketing of aldicarb was stopped in Long Island
in 1980 due to high levels of aldicarb degradates found in ground water there. In 1981, aldicarb
was classified as a restricted use pesticide and in 1984 was placed under Special Review.
Aldicarb is currently under Special Review because of concerns regarding ground water
contamination. Position Documents (PD's) 1 and 2/3 were published on 7/11/84 (49 FR 28320)
and 6/29/88 (53 FR 24630), respectively. A Special Review Data Call-in-Notice (DCI) was
issued 6/3/89 requiring the registrant to submit additional ground water data. In addition,
because a National Food Survey identified discrepancies between anticipated residues in foods
and actual residues from food survey samples, the Special Review required a variety of studies
related to use on potatoes and citrus crops. In 1990, the sale of aldicarb on potatoes was
voluntarily suspended due to detection of tolerance-exceeding aldicarb residues on individual
potatoes. The registrant agreed to dietary risk reduction actions involving voluntary cancellation
of use on bananas and registration amendments for uses on potatoes, sweet potatoes, oranges and
grapefruit. The registrant subsequently submitted extensive field residue and commercial storage
and processing data showing that more controlled application techniques would ensure residues
below the established tolerance and would not pose any increased dietary risk. The use on
potatoes was re-instated in the states of FL, ID, WA and OR, after new application methods
demonstrated significantly lower residues in potatoes. Although dietary risk concerns relating to
use on potatoes have been resolved, aldicarb remains in EPA's Special Review process because
of concerns about risks of ground water contamination. In 1998, the Agency issued a proposal
as part of Special Review to manage risks due to ground water concerns through national
measures consisting of the prohibition of aldicarb use within 300 feet of a drinking water well,
and geographically specific measures consisting of the requirement for State Management Plans.
The Agency will begin the process to close out the Special Review of aldicarb in the near future.

C. Use and Usage Profile

The following is information on the currently registered uses of aldicarb. Sections IV
and V include information on those currently registered uses which are eligible for reregi strati on
and Appendix A provides a detailed table of those uses which are eligible for reregi strati on.

Type of Pesticide: Aldicarb is a systemic insecticide, acaricide and nematicide used to
control the following pests: a number of nematode species
(suppression); leaf phylloxera; bud moth;; aphids; mites; white flies;
thrips; fleahoppers, leafminers; leafhoppers; overwintering boll
weevil; lygus; cotton leaf perforator; seedcorn maggot; Mexican bean
beetle; flea beetles; Colorado potato beetle; greenbug; chinch bug;
three cornered alfalfa hopper (suppression); and sugar beet root
maggot.
Page 12 of 191

-------
Formulations: Aldicarb is formulated and marketed solely as a granular pesticide
under the trade name Temik®. The granulars (5, 10 and 15% a.i.)
consist of aldicarb adhered to a corn cob grit or gypsum substrate,
which are formulated to produce less dust than typical clay substrates
used for granular pesticides. The gypsum granular is available in
closed loading systems.

Methods of Application: End-use products containing aldicarb are restricted use and can only
be applied by a certified applicator. Typically, aldicarb is applied
early in the growing season, either pre-plant, at-planting, or early
post-emergent, using ground application equipment. Positive
displacement application equipment and immediate soil incorporation
are required. Aldicarb is also applied as a split-season use to peanuts.
It is applied as a broadcast (at-pegging) to the canopy of the peanut
plant for nematode control.
Use Sites:
Application Rates:

Estimated Usage:
No aldicarb products are intended for sale to homeowners or for use
by professional applicators in residential environments. Aldicarb is
currently registered for use on agricultural crops including citrus,
cotton, dry beans, peanuts, pecans, potatoes, sorghum, soybeans,
sugar beets, sugarcane, sweet potatoes, and seed alfalfa (CA). In
addition, aldicarb may be applied to field grown ornamentals (CA),
tobacco, and on coffee grown in Puerto Rico.

The maximum application rates range from 1.05 pounds (Ibs) active
ingredient (ai) per acre (A) for sorghum to 10.05 Ibs ai/A for pecans.

Approximately 4.5 million pounds of aldicarb are used annually.
Aldicarb is used mostly on cotton (approximately 64% of total
aldicarb use). Other high use crops include peanuts, potatoes, sugar
beets, and citrus.
D. Tolerances

Tolerances for aldicarb are expressed in terms of the combined residues of aldicarb and
its cholinesterase-inhibiting metabolites aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone in plant,
livestock, and processed food and feed commodities [40 CFR §180.269, §185.150 (a), and
§186.150]. Section IV includes a summary of the tolerance reassessment decision for aldicarb
and lists those tolerances the Agency will propose to revoke, decrease, increase, maintain,
reassign, and establish.
Page 13 of 191

-------
III. Aldicarb Human Health and Environmental Fate and Effects Risk Assessments

Human health effects and environmental fate and effects risk assessments have been
performed for aldicarb. These assessments demonstrate potential human health risks of concern
for ground water contamination in the southeastern coastal plains resulting from the use on
peanuts, and environmental risks of concern to both terrestrial and aquatic organisms resulting
from all uses of aldicarb. A summary of potential risk concerns are presented below. For
additional information and the risk assessments in their entirety, please refer to the revised
human health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments for aldicarb, dated February
26, 2007, and November 30, 2005, respectively. These documents are also available in the
public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 located on-line at http://www.regulations.gov.

A. Human Health

As discussed in Section 5.2 of the human health risk assessment (found at
http://www.regulations.gov./), there are risk estimates that exceed EPA's level of concern from
aggregate dietary exposure to residents living in the U.S. southeastern coastal plain who
consume water from rural ground water wells.

Four drinking water (from ground water sources) concentration scenarios were modeled
for aldicarb: three ground water scenarios for use on peanuts/cotton in Georgia with an
assumption of a 300 ft., 500 ft., and 1000 ft. setback, as well as an additional scenario in Florida
for aldicarb use on citrus with a 1000 ft. setback. The estimated risks at the 99.9th percentile are
below the Agency's level of concern for all four scenarios, and for all population subgroups
except for infants under the Georgia 300ft. scenario (139% - 147% of the acute population
adjusted dose (aPAD)). For all other scenarios, risk are not of concern to the Agency.

B. Environmental Fate and Effects

There are multiple lines of evidence, including studies in the open literature and registrant
submitted data, clearly demonstrating that aldicarb is very highly toxic to both aquatic and
terrestrial non-target organisms (e.g., a single granule of TEMIK® 15G can kill a small bird).
However, the degree to which there is exposure to aldicarb or its degradates in the terrestrial and
aquatic environments is much more uncertain. This is due in part to the physical properties (e.g.,
color, size, and solubility) of the aldicarb granule, the variety of application techniques, amounts
applied, number of applications, application intervals, and timing of applications. Typically, the
aldicarb granules are spread on the surface and incorporated into the soil by "shanking in",
"working into the soil", "covering with soil", and/or "wetting in". Applications directly "in-
furrow" are also performed for some crops (e.g., sweet potato), but may be followed by later
applications that are less effectively soil-incorporated. The ecological risk assessment was
conducted assuming that the aldicarb granules are incorporated into the soil with efficiencies
ranging from 85 to 99 percent, leaving just 1 to 15 percent of the applied granules on the soil
surface available to terrestrial organisms or to runoff to surface water (resulting in exposure to
aquatic organisms). Certain application techniques, specifically, in-furrow applications and
banded applications that utilize state-of-the-art methods (such as positive displacement and
immediate soil incorporation), may theoretically result in incorporation efficiencies of 99
Page 14 of 191

-------
percent. Other types of applications may result in incorporation efficiencies closer to 85 percent.
Because of this uncertainty, both scenarios were addressed in the ecological risk assessment. In
addition to this, risk quotients were calculated for both maximum labeled rates and typical
application rates, showing the range of expected outcomes.

There are two aldicarb degradates of concern, aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone,
that are also considered in the assessment. These degradates appear to form primarily in the
shallow subsurface (although some may also form within plant tissue) and are potentially more
mobile and persistent than the parent. As a conservative assumption, all three forms (parent
aldicarb, sulfoxide, and sulfone) are considered as a single constituent for aquatic exposure
estimates because of the longer degradate half-lives. Parent only is considered for terrestrial
exposure because of its higher toxicity to animals, the likelihood that most exposure would be to
whole granules, and because only small amounts of the degradates, relative to the parent, are
expected to be present directly on the surface.

Given the methods of application of the aldicarb granule (i.e., ground application and
incorporation into the soil), its high water solubility, low vapor pressure, and low
bioaccumulation potential, terrestrial exposure to aldicarb is primarily confined to the treated
field. Off-site terrestrial exposure to aldicarb would be limited to cases where, 1) a granule is re-
deposited to lower-lying areas affected by aldicarb runoff from nearby fields, or 2) a granule in
the gut or on a prey item such as a small bird or mammal is consumed by a predator. The series
of events that would need to transpire in order to result in off-site exposure are considered
unlikely.

Summarizing the risk to terrestrial organisms, the acute risk level of concern for birds and
mammals is exceeded for all target crops at both maximum allowed label rates and typical use
rates. The levels of concern are consistently exceeded by a factor of greater than 100X and are
frequently exceeded by more than 1000X. These results consider both 85 and 99 percent
incorporation efficiencies. The granules left exposed on the surface appear to be the main source
of exposure, but other sources such as residues taken up by plants and soil invertebrates (e.g.,
earthworms) may also serve as a means of exposure.

The following tables (Table 1 and Table 2) provide risk quotients that were calculated
based on maximum labeled application rates and the average or typical application rates taken
from the Biological and Economic Analysis Division's Quantitative Usage Analysis dated
August 9, 2004, as well as label-indicated band widths and row spacing. Granule incorporation
efficiency was set at 85 percent (Table 1) or 99 percent incorporation (Table 2). Based on this
information, it is evident that risk levels of concern are exceeded even at rates that are less than
the application rates allowed by the product labels and at granule incorporation efficiencies
approaching 100 percent.
Page 15 of 191

-------
Table 1. Ranges of acute risk quotients for small, medium, and large birds and mammals
exposed to maximum label rate and typical application rates at 85% incorporation efficiency.
Crop
(max. rate/typical rate in
Ibs ai/acre)
Citrus (4.95/3. 7)
Cotton (4.05/0.6)
Dry Beans (2. 1/1.0)
Peanuts (3.0/0.9)
Pecans (10. 05/3.1)
Potatoes (3. 0/2. 7)
Soybeans (3.0/0.7)
Sugar beets (4.95/1. 8)
Alfalfa (3. 0/NA)
Coffee (4.4/NA)1
Sugarcane (3. 0/NA)
Tobacco (3. 0/NA)
Ornamental (5. 0/NA)
Maximum Rate
Avian RQs
9-771
71 -6396
29 - 2620
31 -2807
17-1566
33-2963
26-2339
32-2831
5-451
246-22,110
50-4512
20-1805
0.6 - 52
Typical Rate
Avian RQs
6-577
11 -948
13 - 1248
9-842
5-483
30 - 2667
6-546
1 1 - 972
not available
not available
not available
not available
not available
Maximum Rate
Mammalian RQs
11-261
93-2161
38-885
41 -948
23 - 529
43-1001
34 - 790
41-956
7-158
332-7738
68-1579
27 - 632
0.8-18
Typical Rate
Mammalian RQs
8- 195
14-320
18-422
12-285
7- 163
39-901
8- 184
14-328
not available
not available
not available
not available
not available
 No incorporation assumed based on product label directions.
Table 2. Ranges of acute risk quotients for small, medium, and large birds and mammals
exposed to maximum label rate and typical application rates at 99% incorporation efficiency.
Crop
(max. rate/typical rate in
Ibs ai/acre)
Citrus (4.95/3.7)
Cotton (4.05/0.6)
Dry Beans (2. 1/1.0)
Sorghum (1.05/0.4)
Peanuts (3.0/0.9)
Pecans (10.05/3.1)
Potatoes (3. 0/2.7)
Soybeans (3. 0/0. 7)
Sugar beets (4.95/1. 8)
Sweet potatoes (3.0/1.4)
Ornamental (5. 0/NA)
Maximum Rate
Avian RQs
0.6-52
5-428
2-175
2- 193
2- 188
1- 105
2-198
2- 157
2-190
1-125
0.6 - 52
Typical Rate
Avian RQs
0.4-39
0.7-63
0.9-84
0.8-73
0.6-56
0.4-32
2-179
0.4-37
0.7-65
0.7-58
not available
Maximum Rate
Mammalian RQs
0.8- 17
6- 145
3-59
3-65
2.7 - 64
2-35
3-67
2-53
3-64
2-42
0.8-18
Typical Rate
Mammalian RQs
0.6- 13
0.9-21
1 -28
1 -25
0.8-19
0.5- 11
3-60
0.5 - 12
0.9 - 22
0.8-20
not available
                                          Page 16 of 191

-------
The potential for mortality to birds has been an area of initial focus, given aldicarb's
mode of action and very high acute toxicity. Chronic risk to birds has not yet been quantitatively
assessed. However, based on inference from mammalian data, which involved comparing
magnitudes of LD50s between the mallard duck (1.0 mg/kg-bw) and rat (0.9 mg/kg-bw) and then
using this information together with the chronic information available for the laboratory rat
(reproductive NOAEL = 0.7-0.9 mg/kg-bw), the Agency expects that birds (as well as
mammals) that survive acute exposure to aldicarb may suffer adverse reproductive (chronic)
effects. The Agency is requesting additional data to confirm this hypothesis.

While there are some exceedences of acute levels of concern for aquatic species, risk
from chronic exposure to aldicarb and its degradates appears to be more significant. The chronic
level of concern is exceeded for several uses at maximum application rates and 99 percent
incorporation efficiency for freshwater fish and invertebrates, as well as for estuarine/marine fish
and invertebrates. However, under typical application rates, these risks for the most part are
mitigated. In addition to risk based on exposure estimates from aquatic exposure modeling, there
were also exceedences of the Agency levels of concern based on EECs derived from monitoring
data.

There have been 29 incidents related to aldicarb reported in the Environmental Incident
Information System database (reported to the Agency from 1988 to 2005). Of these 29 incidents,
16 were from misuse, 11 were of undetermined use, and 2 were registered agricultural uses.
Approximately 17 of the 29 incidents reported included bird kills. Fourteen bird kill incidents
were from intentional misuse, and 3 were of undetermined use. Eight of these incidents also
resulted in mammal kills (all misuse or undetermined use).

When evaluating incident data, it is important to note that currently, no systematic or
reliable mechanism exists for the accurate monitoring and reporting of wildlife kill incidents to
the Agency. Moreover, before a pesticide incident can be reported or investigated, the dead
animals must first be found. In the absence of monitoring following pesticide applications, kills
are not likely to be noticed in agro-environments which are generally away form human activity.
It is likely that poisoned birds may fly from the use sites, succumbing outside of the area or
scavengers may remove carcasses before they can be observed, significantly reducing the chance
of detection.
Page 17 of 191

-------
IV. Risk Management, Reregistration, and Tolerance Reassessment Decisions

       A. Determination of Reregistration Eligibility

       Section 4(g)(2)(A) of FIFRA calls for the Agency to determine, after submission of
relevant data concerning an active ingredient, whether or not products containing the active
ingredient are eligible for reregi strati on. The Agency has previously identified and required the
submission of the generic (technical grade) data required to support reregi strati on of products
containing aldicarb as an active ingredient.  The Agency has completed its review of these
generic data, and has determined that the data are sufficient to support reregi strati on of all
products containing aldicarb provided the registrations are amended in a manner consistent with
this document.

       The Agency has completed its review of submitted data and its assessment of the dietary
(both food and drinking water), occupational, and ecological risks associated with the use of
pesticide products containing the active ingredient aldicarb. Based on these data and public
comments received on the Agency's assessments for the active ingredient aldicarb, the Agency
has sufficient information on the human health and ecological effects of aldicarb to make a
decision as part of the tolerance reassessment process under FFDCA and reregi strati on process
under FIFRA, as amended by FQPA.

       Based on its evaluation of aldicarb, the Agency has determined that products containing
the active ingredient aldicarb, unless labeled and used as specified in this document, would
present risks inconsistent with FIFRA and FFDCA.  Accordingly, should a registrant fail to
implement any of the risk mitigation measures identified in this document, the Agency may take
appropriate regulatory action to address the risk concerns from the use of aldicarb.  If all changes
outlined in this document are incorporated into the product labels, then all current risks for
aldicarb will be adequately addressed for the purposes of this determination under FIFRA. Once
a comprehensive endangered species assessment is completed, further changes to these
registrations may be necessary as explained in Section IV.D.4 of this document below.

       B. Public Comments and Responses

       Through the Agency's public participation process, EPA worked with stakeholders and
the public to reach these regulatory decisions for aldicarb.  The Phase 3 public comment period
on the risk assessments, opened on May 17, 2006, and the Phase 5 public comment period on the
risk assessments and solicitation for additional input to use/usage opened on November 14, 2006.
The Agency received comments from several stakeholders (including stakeholders from public
interest groups), and the technical registrant, Bayer CropScience.  A complete listing of these
comments can be found at http://www.regulations.gov./

       These comments were reviewed and taken into consideration in preparing the revised risk
assessments and their supporting documents, including this aldicarb RED. The comments are
available in their entirety in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 located on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov./.  The Agency's responses to substantive comments are available in
                                     Page 18 of 191

-------
memoranda in the public docket and the revised assessments available in the public docket
reflect these responses.

C. Regulatory Position

1. Food Quality Protection Act Findings

a. "Risk Cup" Determination

As part of the FQPA tolerance reassessment process, EPA assessed the risks associated
with aldicarb. The Agency has concluded that, with the risk mitigation measures outlined in this
document, the aggregate risk from food and drinking water exposures to aldicarb is within its
own "risk cup." The Agency has determined that the human health risks from these combined
exposures are within acceptable levels and that, considering every issue other than the
cumulative impacts of exposure to other n-methyl carbamate pesticides, the established
tolerances for aldicarb, with label amendments and changes as specified in this document, meet
the safety standards under the FQPA amendments to Section 408(b)(2)(C) and 408(b)(2)(D) of
the FFDCA. In reaching these determinations, EPA has considered the available information on
the special sensitivity of infants and children.

b. Determination of Safety to U.S. Population (Including Infants and
Children)

The Agency has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
the general U.S. population, infants, children, or other major identifiable subgroups of
consumers, from the use of aldicarb. The safety determination considers factors such as the
toxicity, use practices and exposure scenarios, and environmental behavior of aldicarb. In
determining whether or not infants and children are particularly susceptible to toxic effects from
exposure to residues of aldicarb, the Agency considered the completeness of the hazard database
for developmental and reproductive effects, the nature of the effects observed, and other
information.

The Agency determined it was necessary to retain a 2X FQPA database uncertainty factor
for aldicarb residues in the dietary human health risk assessment because magnitude of the brain
cholinesterase inhibition was approximately 2-fold greater in the young rat compared to the adult
rat at similar acute doses. For specific information relating to the Agency's decision on the
FQPA factor, refer to section 3.4 in the February 26, 2007 Human Health Revised Risk
Assessment found at http://www.regulations.gov./

c. Endocrine Disrupter Effects

EPA is required under the FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, to develop a screening
program to determine whether certain substances (including all pesticide active and other
ingredients) "may have an effect in humans that is similar to an effect produced by a naturally
occurring estrogen, or other such endocrine effects as the Administrator may designate. "
Following the recommendations of its Endocrine Disrupter Screening and Testing Advisory
Page 19 of 191

-------
Committee (EDSTAC), EPA determined that there were scientific bases for including, as part of
the program, androgen and thyroid hormone systems, in addition to the estrogen hormone
system. EPA also adopted EDSTAC's recommendation that the Program include evaluations of
potential effects in wildlife. When the appropriate screening and/or testing protocols being
considered under the Agency's Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program (EDSP) have been
developed and vetted, aldicarb may be subjected to additional screening and/or testing to better
characterize possible effects related to endocrine disruption.

d. Cumulative Risks

FFDCA Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) requires that the Agency consider "available
information" concerning cumulative effects of a particular pesticides residues and "other
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity" when considering whether to establish,
modify, or revoke a tolerance for pesticide residues in food. EPA considers cumulative effects
from pesticides and other substances because low-level exposures to multiple chemical
substances causing a common effect by a common mechanism could lead to the same adverse
health effect as would a higher level of exposure to each individual substance.

Aldicarb is a member of the N-methyl carbamate class of pesticides, which share a
common mechanism of toxicity by affecting the nervous system via cholinesterase inhibition. A
cumulative risk assessment, which evaluates exposures based on a common mechanism of
toxicity, was conducted to evaluate risk from food, drinking water, residential use, and other
non-occupational exposures resulting from registered uses of N-methyl carbamate pesticides,
including aldicarb. EPA has concluded that the cumulative risks associated with the N-methyl
carbamate pesticides are below the Agency's level of concern. For additional information, refer
to the document, Revised N-methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment, which is available
in the EPA docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0935 and on the website,
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/.

2. Tolerance Summary

The tolerance summary and tolerance reassessment decision is presented for aldicarb in
Table 3 below. Currently there are forty tolerances listed in 40 CFR §180.269, 40 CFR
§185.150, and 40 CFR §186.150 for residues of aldicarb on raw and agricultural commodities
and livestock commodities.

The available aldicarb residue chemistry data are considered adequate to reassess most
tolerances. The Agency will propose establishing a citrus fruit crop group tolerance of 0.3 ppm.

Some commodities with established tolerances must be revised to reflect the correct
commodity definition. Additional data are needed to determine appropriate tolerances for
residues in/on cottonseed and cotton gin by-products.

The established tolerance for residues in peanut hulls should be revoked since this raw
agricultural commodity is no longer considered to be significant livestock feed items (OPPTS
Series 860.1000, Table 1, 8/96). The Agency recommends classification of residues in livestock
Page 20 of 191

-------
commodities under 40 CFR §180.6(a)(3); therefore, tolerances for residues in livestock
commodities should be revoked.
Table 3. Tolerance Reassessment Summary for Aldicarb and Aldicarb Sulfone and
Aldicarb Sulfoxide.
Commodity
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Comment/
[Correct Commodity Definition]
Tolerances Listed Under 40 CFR 180.269:
Barley, hay
Barley, grain
Barley, straw
Beans (dry)
Beets, sugar
Beets, sugar, tops
Cattle, fat
Cattle, mbyp
Cattle, meat
Coffee beans
Cottonseed
Goats, fat
Goats, mbyp
Goats, meat
Grapefruits
Lemons
Limes
Oranges
Hogs, fat
Hogs, mbyp
Hogs, meat
Horses, fat
Horses, mbyp
Horses, meat
Milk
Peanut
Peanut, hulls
Pecan
Potato
Sheep, fat
Sheep, mbyp
Sheep, meat
-
-
-
0.1
0.05
1
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.05
0.5
0.5
1
0.01
0.01
0.01
3.0
0.02
0.1
0.1
0.05
1
Revoke
0.1
0.1
Revoke
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Revoke
0.05
Revoke
Revoke
0.2
Revoke
Rotational crop tolerances recommended by
HED.
[bean, dry, seed]
\beet, sugar, roots]
[beet, sugar, tops]
There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.
[coffee, green bean, import tolerance only]
[cotton, undelinted seed]
There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.
The registrant has proposed a crop group
tolerance of 0.3 ppm for fruit, citrus, group.
There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.

Peanut hulls are not considered to be a
significant livestock feed item.
Revoke
The available data reflecting the supported
use pattern indicate the established tolerance
should be reduced.
There is no reasonable expectation of finite
residues.
                                    Page 21 of 191

-------
Commodity
Sorghum, stover (fodder)
Sorghum, grain
Soybean
Sugarcane
Sugarcane, fodder
Sugarcane, forage
Sweet potatoes
Wheat, forage
Wheat, grain
Wheat, straw
Wheat, hay
Current
Tolerance
(ppm)
0.5
0.2
0.02
0.02
0.1
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
Tolerance
Reassessment
(ppm)
Revoke
Revoke
0.02
Revoke
Revoke
Revoke
0.1
1.0
0.02
0.1
3.0
Comment/
[Correct Commodity Definition]

soybean, seed
[import tolerance only]
These commodities are not considered to be
significant livestock feed items.
sweet potato, root
Rotational crop tolerances recommended by
HED.
Required Tolerances to be Listed Under 40 CFR §180.269
Cotton, gin byproducts
—
TBDa

Tolerances Listed Under 40 CFR §186.150:
Citrus pulp, dried
Cottonseed, hulls
0.6
0.3
Revoke
Revoke
Commodity covered by the raw agricultural
commodity tolerance.
Commodity covered by the raw agricultural
commodity tolerance.
a Data depicting the magnitude of aldicarb residues of concern in cotton gin byproducts are required in accordance
with Table 1 of OPPTS Series 860 Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines, 8/96.
D. Regulatory Rationale

1. Human Health Risk Management and Mitigation

a. Dietary Risk Mitigation (Drinking Water)

As discussed in Section 5.2 of the human health risk assessment (found at
http://www.regulations.gov.A), there are risk estimates that exceed EPA's level of concern from
aggregate dietary exposure to residents living in the U.S. southeastern coastal plain who
consume water from rural ground water wells in specific vulnerable areas.
Four ground water scenarios were modeled for aldicarb. The estimated risks at the 99.9
percentile are below the Agency's level of concern for all four scenarios, and for all population
,th
Page 22 of 191

-------
subgroups except for infants under the Georgia 300 feet peanut scenario. For all other scenarios,
risk are not of concern to the Agency.

Therefore, in order to mitigate potential drinking water concerns in the peanut growing
regions in the states of Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, and Florida, an increased well set-
back from 300 to 500 feet is required for wells not encased to a depth of 100 feet in vulnerable
soils, and a shallow depth to ground water (less than 25 feet).

The determination for this buffer was based upon both monitoring data and modeling.
The Agency utilized the Natural Resource Conservation Service's (NRCS) criteria for high
leaching potential soils for Florida and encourages the technical registrant, Bayer CropScience to
use the same criteria when determining vulnerable soils for other states. The Agency's review of
"A Retrospective Ground Water Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in the
Southeastern United States; Mississippi Delta; Texas; California; and Pacific Northwest", dated
July 24, 2007, and found at http://www.regulations.gov./ contains the reference to the NRCS
criteria.

b. Aggregate Risk Mitigation

As previously discussed, food and drinking water are below the Agency's level of
concern with the mitigation for ground water in the Southeastern states of Alabama, Georgia,
South Carolina, and Florida. There are no residential exposures, therefore, no additional
mitigation is needed to address aggregate risk. Label changes and language necessary for
reregi strati on are specified in Table 5 in Section V.

c. Occupational Risk Mitigation

As discussed in Section 10 of the human health risk assessment there are no risks of
concern to workers performing tasks such as mixing, loading, and applying, based on current
labeling. Moreover, since aldicarb is applied to soil when little foliage is present, there are no re-
entry risks, given the current Restricted-Entry Intervals (REIs). Therefore, no additional
mitigation is necessary.

2. Ecological Risk Management and Mitigation

As discussed in the environmental fate and effects risk assessment, ecological risks
(direct adverse acute effects) to non-target aquatic and terrestrial organisms are of concern from
the use of aldicarb. Additionally, there are chronic risks to aquatic invertebrates (freshwater and
estuarine/marine) and freshwater fish. Aldicarb is also a potential ground water, and possibly
surface water, contaminant. The ecological risk assessments exhibit RQ values which exceed the
various target levels of concern. Risks are much higher, as evidenced by higher RQ values, for
terrestrial organisms, especially to birds. In addition to the mitigation outlined below, the
Agency intends to require additional confirmatory data which are listed in Table 4 of Section V.

a. Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms
Page 23 of 191

-------
Terrestrial
The Agency's assessment suggests the potential for acute effects to terrestrial organisms
for all application scenarios. Aldicarb is highly toxic to birds, mammals, honeybees, and
earthworms; however, due to aldicarb's granular formulation and, in most cases, immediate
incorporation into the soil, risks from exposure (undissolved granules left on the surface) to birds
and mammals are lessened. In summary, the Agency is concerned with all use patterns for acute
effects to birds and mammals. As appropriate under FIFRA, the Agency has weighed the
potential risk with the expected benefits of continued use. These conclusions are presented
below.

Aquatic
The Agency's assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic
invertebrates and fish. Adverse effects include reduced survival and reduced reproduction when
exposed to aldicarb and/or its metabolites (aldicarb sulfoxide, aldicarb sulfone) as a result of
labeled use. Aquatic plants are also subject to adverse effects (reduced survival) when exposed
to aldicarb and/or its metabolites (aldicarb sulfoxide, aldicarb sulfone) as a result of labeled use.

For potential risk to aquatic species, the chronic level of concern is exceeded for several
uses at maximum application rates and 99 percent incorporation efficiency for freshwater fish
and invertebrates, as well as for estuarine/marine fish and invertebrates. However, under typical
application rates, these risks for the most part are mitigated. Direct application of aldicarb to
streams, lakes, and ponds is forbidden by product labels; however, following a rain event,
aldicarb may reach aquatic environments from areas of application in sheet and channel-flow
runoff, because aldicarb is moderately persistent in terrestrial environments and soluble in water.
It is unlikely that aquatic organisms will be directly exposed to granules, both because of the
highly soluble nature of the compound (whole granules will dissolve rather than be transported
intact) and because of the application methods (directly onto field). Aquatic organisms could
also be exposed to aldicarb residues and degradates from ground water that is subsequently
discharged into a surface water body.

3. Mitigation Summary and Crop-Specific Analyses

The Agency has worked with the technical registrant, Bayer CropScience, to reduce
potential exposure of aldicarb to wildlife and aquatic life. Subsequently, Bayer has agreed to
voluntarily cancel all current registrations on the following crops:

• Coffee
• Ornamentals
• Pecans
• Sugarcane
• Sorghum
• Tobacco
• Alfalfa grown for seed

These proposals for cancellation will be announced in the Federal Register (FR). A
subsequent FR Notice will finalize the cancellation absent significant comment to change the
Page 24 of 191

-------
Agency's position. As part of the Agency's mitigation plan, labels will be amended shortly to
remove these uses.

To further reduce ecological concerns, the Agency has determined that the label changes
(as specified in Table 5 in Section V), as agreed upon by the technical registrant Bayer
CropScience, and discussed with stakeholders for specific scenarios and crops, are appropriate
and required for reregi strati on eligibility. Listed below are the specific crop use sites/patterns for
aldicarb along with corresponding RQs of concern for birds and mammals, stakeholder input on
use, alternatives/benefits, mitigation, and EPA's decision regarding reregi strati on eligibility. As
a general matter, the Agency has determined that although there is potential for harm to wildlife
because of use of aldicarb, that harm will generally be limited in time and space. The Agency
also determined that these risks are often outweighed by the benefits expected from use of
aldicarb instead of existing alternatives. The Agency was also mindful in this analysis that
aldicarb does not pose risks of concerns to pesticide applicators or to farm workers generally.
Citrus
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb is used on citrus in Florida and Texas only. Application currently consists of a
side-dress application and is usually applied along the side of the tree row in furrow and
immediately covered with soil. The maximum application rate for use on citrus is currently 4.95
Ibs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to citrus (2 inches in depth), the Agency
has assumed that 85% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that 15% may remain on
the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Because of acute toxicity and ground water contamination concerns, anyone who applies
aldicarb in Florida is required to obtain a permit from the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services for each application to be made. This permitting process involves the
collaborative efforts of the registrant, state officials and growers to ensure that every application
of aldicarb is permitted and recorded. For additional information on the aldicarb permitting
system in Florida's State Division of Agricultural Environmental Services, please see
http://www.flaes.org/temik/.

Risks of Concern Assuming 85% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 9 to 771. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 6 to 577. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 11 to 261. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from
8 to 195. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the
potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input on Citrus
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to the written
comments received from respondents as listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency met with and
received comments from Bayer CropScience, the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (FDACS), Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association (FFVA), USD A, and
many other interested stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on citrus.
Page 25 of 191

-------
These stakeholders have provided additional information regarding aldicarb usage (application
methods and rates) and the use of aldicarb in citrus production. In particular, these stakeholders
noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth, resulting in increased yields when used on
citrus. Subsequent meetings, site visits and teleconference calls with Bayer, FDACS, and FFVA
have led to the Agency's understanding of the aldicarb permitting process in Florida.

Alternatives and Benefits
Aldicarb is a recommended insecticide for mites, the Asian Citrus Psyllid (AsCP), and
nematode control. Citrus greening is a severe vascular disease transmitted by the Asian citrus
psyllid. The psyllid is a relatively new pest that now ranges throughout all the citrus producing
areas in Florida and Texas. Greening is a disease that slowly weakens and kills all types of citrus
trees, and causes fruit to become lopsided and taste bitter. No cure exists for a tree that contracts
the disease. As of 2006, greening had been found in more than 440 different locations in at least
11 Florida counties. Although the AsCP has been found in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas,
citrus greening has not been found there at this time.

There are several alternatives to aldicarb for control of mites, but there appears to be no
feasible alternative to aldicarb for nematode control. Estimated yield losses in Florida without
aldicarb are 5 to 10 percent, which corresponds to an annual loss of about $4.6 to $9.3 million
for oranges and grapefruit combined. There are no alternatives for control of AsCP, the vector
for citrus greening.

For nematode control specifically, aldicarb is used to control the citrus and burrowing
nematodes although it does not effectively control the burrowing nematode as aldicarb only
remains in the shallow part of the root zone. Other nematodes with limited economic importance
in Florida are the sting nematode and lesion nematode.

EPA's analysis concludes that the absence of aldicarb for use on citrus acreage for
controlling both nematodes and other insects can result in yield losses of 5 to 10 percent.
Therefore, the cost to growers will be quite high. A 5 to 10 percent yield loss to the "average"
grower in Florida corresponds to a $97 to $193 in lost revenue per acre. For the grapefruit
grower, a 5 to 10 percent yield loss corresponds to a loss in revenue of $109 to $218 per acre. If
the loss to nematodes increased over time, as nematode populations increase, these losses may
get worse. The 2000/2001 - 2004/2005 value of orange production in Florida was about $1.1
billion and the value of grapefruit production was approximately $209 million. A 10 percent
reduction on the 7 percent of acreage treated with aldicarb would result in a loss of
approximately $3.9 to $7.8 million annually to Florida orange growers, and $0.7 to $1.5 million
to Florida grapefruit growers.

For additional information, refer to the Agency's complete alternative/quantitative impact
memo for citrus and the BEAD response to Phase 3 comments for citrus, cotton and pecans
which are available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov/.

Mitigation
Page 26 of 191

-------
To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency, in agreement with the technical
registrant of aldicarb, has developed several mitigation measures to help address the above
mentioned concerns. They include:

• Label clarifications to specify application of granules in 3 to 6 furrows beside individual
trees, that are 2 inches deep and spaced on approximately 12 inch centers, immediately
covering with soil.
• Label modifications to help reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the surface of the soil
making it less available for the wildlife potentially at risk. For specific label language,
please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision
Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species.
However, due to the physical properties of aldicarb's granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility)
and how aldicarb is soil incorporated, actual exposure of potentially affected populations to
aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overestimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals
would be limited primarily to the treated fields where wildlife, if present, could ingest granules
that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of
exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expected to be limited. The Agency recognizes,
however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

Additionally, the Agency also acknowledges that, although risks were calculated
assuming 85% soil incorporation, actual aldicarb granules available on or just under the soil's
surface for potential consumption by birds or mammals is unlikely, given the methods of
application including positive displacement (mechanized placement of granules beneath the soil)
and lock-and-load containers which minimize potential spillage of product.

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on citrus and, as
quantified above, losing its use would involve additional costs to growers. Aldicarb has
advantages to citrus growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of
management, confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost
effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control.

Aldicarb provides control against insects, including nematodes, in portions of citrus
production areas. Because of its long residual activity, in many cases growers can apply one
treatment of aldicarb, rather than multiple treatments of other chemicals for equivalent insect
control. Also, potential worker risks from multiple foliar applications of these alternative
products are not insignificant. Therefore, the use on citrus is eligible for reregi strati on.
Cotton
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb is used on cotton primarily for control of thrips, although it controls other insect
pests. In addition, there is also evidence of aldicarb use to control nematodes on cotton.
Aldicarb is applied at-plant or as a side-dress application. The at planting application is
administered in the furrow with the cotton seed and immediately covered with soil. Greater than
Page 27 of 191

-------
97% of the use on cotton is this at-plant application. The side-dress application is usually
administered after the cotton has emerged from the soil and is applied along the side of the plant
row (8 inches from the plants, two or three inches deep) in furrow and immediately covered with
soil. The maximum application rate for use on cotton is currently 4.05 Ibs ai/A. Due to the
nature of how aldicarb is applied to cotton (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has
estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the
surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 5 to 428. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 63. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 6 to 145. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from
0.9 to 21. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the
potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement /Input on Cotton
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to the written
comments received from respondents as listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency met with and
received comments from Bayer, the National Cotton Council of America, Cotton Growers
Association, Georgia Cotton Commission, USD A, as well as many other interested stakeholders
with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on cotton. In particular, these stakeholders
noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth, resulting in increased yields when used on
cotton.

Alternatives and Benefits
The Agency acknowledges that the use of aldicarb has benefits to cotton growers.
Although thrips and other insects are targeted, aldicarb is applied to cotton in Texas and the
Southeast to control nematodes as well. Based on EPA proprietary data, an annual average of
about 1.4 million acre treatments (about 38% of total applications) of aldicarb have targeted
nematodes between 2002 and 2006. The state with the most acre treatments against nematodes is
Georgia, with an annual average of about 360,000 acres, followed by Texas (about 270,000 acres
annually) and North Carolina (about 200,000 acres annually).

For thrip control, no one chemical could replace aldicarb, but a combination of chemicals
could be used effectively. This combination for insect control was more expensive than aldicarb:
the Agency estimates that chemical costs alone would be about $2 per acre higher in Mississippi
and $22 per acre higher in California. These chemicals also do not share the advantages of
aldicarb which are a longer period of effectiveness and control over multiple pests, including
nematodes. If nematodes are considered a target pest, as they are in Texas and the Southeast,
growers have fewer alternatives to aldicarb. The best control for nematodes would be 1,3-
dichloropropene (1,3-D). The additional cost for replacing aldicarb with 1,3-D, along with the
combination of chemicals to provide control of thrips is about $38 per acre. Of that figure, $36
per acre is based on the chemical cost of 1,3-D. If it were assumed that these acres were treated
with 1,3-D instead, the additional costs are over $50 million annually.
Page 28 of 191

-------
For additional information, refer to the Agency's complete alternative/quantitative impact
memo for cotton which is available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located
on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/.

• At-plant application rate will be reduced to a maximum of 1.5 Ibs ai/A. This equates to a
63% reduction in rate as compared to the current label.
• Side-dress application rate will be reduced to 2.1 Ibs ai/A. This equates to a 30%
reduction as compared to the current label.
• Per-season application rate is limited to 3.6 Ibs ai/A. This equates to a 63% reduction as
compared to the current label.
• Label specifications to clarify the depth at which aldicarb is applied. Additionally,
modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the surface
of the soil, making it less available for wildlife potentially at risk. For specific label
language, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on cotton and, as
specified above, losing its use would involve additional costs to growers, some of which can be
quantified directly. Aldicarb has advantages to cotton growers for which EPA cannot estimate
dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of control in the face of
unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and
duration of control.

Aldicarb provides control of insects, including nematodes, in portions of cotton
production areas. Alternative pesticides, which can be used to control insect pests (e.g., thrips),
are not effective in controlling multiple pests. Aldicarb also provides protection for a longer
period of time than any of the alternatives. As stated above, because of its long residual activity,
in many cases growers can apply one treatment of aldicarb, rather than multiple treatments of
other chemicals for equivalent insect control. Also, potential worker risks from multiple foliar
applications of these alternative products are not insignificant. Therefore, the use on cotton is
eligible for reregi strati on.
Page 29 of 191

-------
Dry Bean
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb application to dry beans currently consist of an at-plant application. The at-
planting application is administered in the furrow with the dry bean seed and immediately
covered with soil at a depth greater than 2 inches. The maximum application rate for use on dry
bean is currently 2.1 Ibs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to dry bean, the
Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil and that only 1%
remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 175. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.9 to 84. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 3 to 59. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 1
to 28. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the potential
for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Dry Bean
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to the written
comments from respondents as listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and
received comments from Bayer CropScience, USD A, as well as many other interested
stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on dry bean.

Alternatives and Benefits
The Agency understands that aldicarb use on dry bean is of benefit to dry bean growers in
the states of Idaho, Michigan, Oregon and Washington. Aldicarb use in dry bean production is a
valuable tool for controlling aphids, leafhoppers, the Mexican bean beetle, and several species of
nematodes. There are both foliar and seed treatment alternatives, such as thiamethoxam, but
only aldicarb provides season long control at planting, and growers do not have to spray multiple
times. In Michigan, aldicarb is also used to control the root-lesion nematode, which can cause
10% yield reduction and is present in 50% of the dry bean acreage if left uncontrolled. On the
acreage with nematodes that is not treated, growers expect lower yields.

As with other crops, the main value of aldicarb as an insecticide is that a single at-plant
treatment will protect the seedling and young plant for several weeks from attack by nematodes
and several insect pests, some of which are vectors of plant viruses. Although alternatives (such
as esfenvalerate, dimethoate, propargite, and others) exist for use against all insect pests
controlled by aldicarb, it would likely take at least two applications of foliar insecticides to
provide the same level of protection afforded by an at-plant aldicarb treatment. Where
nematodes are also a problem, it would also take a pre-plant application with a soil fumigant,
such as 1,3-D. While aldicarb alternatives exist, the Agency believes that the economic impact
on dry bean growers of shifting to such alternatives for nematode control are likely to be cost
prohibitive, in which case the likely result of loss of aldicarb would be that growers would face a
financial penalty from reduced yield because of nematodes.
Page 30 of 191

-------
Mitigation
To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the registrant has
agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns.
They include:

• Geographically restricting the use to Idaho, Michigan, Oregon, and Washington.
• Modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the surface
of the soil, thereby making it less available for wildlife potentially at risk. For the label
language modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on dry bean and that
losing its use would involve additional costs to growers. Aldicarb has advantages to dry bean
growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management,
confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness
when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the use on dry bean
is eligible for reregi strati on.
Peanut
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb is applied when peanuts are planted, or can be used as a split treatment, where
aldicarb is applied at-plant and also applied later in the season when the plants are forming pegs,
which develop into peanuts. This application is referred to as "at-pegging". Aldicarb is
generally used to control nematodes and thrips on peanuts, primarily in the southern States, as
well for the suppression of leafhoppers and spider mites. To better understand the potential risk
and resulting mitigation, these two use patterns are discussed in more detail below.

At Planting
Aldicarb is applied to peanuts at planting for protection against thrips and several species
of nematodes (e.g. root-knot, lesion, stubby root, sting). For thrips control the granules are
applied in the seed furrow and then covered with soil. The peanut seed is then planted into the
treated zone. When used for nematode control, aldicarb granules are applied in a 6 to 12 inch
band over an open furrow and covered with soil to a depth of 2 to 4 inches. Due to the nature of
Page 31 of 191

-------
how aldicarb is applied to peanuts at planting (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has
estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil and that only 1% remains on the
surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern for the At-Plant Application Method Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 188. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.6 to 56. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 2.7 to 64. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from
0.8 to 19. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the
potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

At Pegging
Aldicarb can also be applied later in the season when the plants are forming pegs (at-
pegging), which develop into peanuts. In this case, aldicarb is typically applied at the initiation
of pegging, in a 12 to 18 inch band over the peanut row. Unlike other aldicarb application
practices, soil incorporation does not occur because the plant has already formed pegs (which
develop into peanuts) just under the surface of the soil. Attempts to incorporate the granules
would damage the roots of the plants and any pegs that have formed. Due to the nature of how
aldicarb is applied to peanuts at pegging (without any mechanical means of soil incorporation),
the Agency has assumed that 100% of the aldicarb applied remains on the surface for potential
terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern for the At-Pegging Application Method
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 31 to 2,807. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 9 to 842. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 41 to 948. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from
12 to 285. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the
potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Peanuts
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to the written
comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received
comments from Bayer, the National Peanut Board, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association,
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, USD A, and other interested
stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on peanuts.

Alternatives and Benefits
For the at-plant use of aldicarb, early season control of nematodes may be achieved with
a pre-plant soil fumigation with 1,3-D; however, it would require one or more other insecticides
(primarily ethoprop) to address other pests. Therefore, for the at-plant use of aldicarb, there are
no chemical or non-chemical alternatives that can provide both insect and nematode control on
peanuts during the first month after plant emergence.

For the at-pegging use of aldicarb, multiple treatments of the alternatives may be
required, and none of those alternatives also control nematodes. Because of aldicarb's ability to
control both nematodes and insect pests, alternatives to aldicarb will consist of at least one
Page 32 of 191

-------
insecticide application for thrips control and one nematicide application in areas where both
pests exist.

Based upon data reviewed by the Agency, withholding the at-pegging aldicarb treatment
caused a yield decrease of 56%. Applying this loss to dollars per acre, it is estimated that
without the aldicarb at-pegging use, revenues would fall from $290 to $227 per acre.

Another important factor considered by the Agency was that nematode damage to peanut
plants does not stop with yield damage, but also causes damage to the peanuts that are harvested.
The Agency is aware that, potentially, this damage could correspond to a discount of about 10
cents per pound. Therefore, revenue loss from reduced quality could be as high as losses from
reduced yields.

In conclusion, without aldicarb, costs to growers from the yield losses due to nematode
damage alone are estimated to exceed $15 million a year in Georgia, and up to $22 million a year
nationwide. It is clear to the Agency that without the use of aldicarb there would be substantial
costs to growers who are currently using aldicarb approximately 30-45 days after plant (at-
pegging); up to $300 per acre based upon data from field trials performed in Georgia.

For additional information, refer to the Agency's complete alternative/quantitative impact
memo for peanuts which is available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located
on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/.

Mitigation
To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the registrant has
agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns.
They include:
• For the split-season, at-pegging use of aldicarb, application must be made late in the
afternoon or early evening and immediately followed by irrigation, and completed within
24 hours which will help dissolve granules thereby making them unavailable for wildlife.
• Label clarifications for post-emergent use: apply granules in a band 12 to 18 inches wide
on the row and into the plant canopy. Ensure that plant foliage is dry prior to application.
Dislodge granules from foliage by suitable means that will not damage the plant.
• Label clarifications to ensure that at-planting applications are done over an open furrow
which is 4 to 6 inches in width, known as "T-band" applications.
• For the specific label language for the application modifications, please refer to Table 5
in Section V.

-------
exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expected to be limited. The Agency recognizes,
however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on peanut (both the at-
planting and at-pegging use) and that losing its use would involve additional costs to growers, as
quantified above. Aldicarb also has advantages to peanut growers for which EPA cannot
estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of control in
the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of
pests and duration of control. Therefore, the use on peanut is eligible for reregi strati on.
Potato
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb is currently registered for use on potatoes only in Oregon, Idaho, Washington,
Montana, northern Florida, and parts of Utah and Nevada. Aldicarb is used primarily to control
green peach aphid, Colorado potato beetle, and also provides some protection against several
species of nematodes. Other pests controlled include leafhoppers and flea beetles.

Aldicarb application to potatoes typically consists of an at-plant or pre-plant application
using positive displacement equipment. Aldicarb granules are applied within the row furrow and
buried along with the seed potato at planting to a depth of four to eight inches. The potato plant
absorbs aldicarb through its roots, and once in the plant, the residual activity of aldicarb protects
the treated plant against pest nematodes and insects for six to eight weeks. The maximum
application rate for use on potato is currently 3.0 Ibs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is
applied to potatoes (at a depth of 4 to 8 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the
aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential
terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 198. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 2 to 179. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 3 to 67. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from 3
to 60. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the potential
for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Potatoes
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to the written
comments received from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and
received comments from Bayer, the National Potato Council, USDA and other interested
stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on potatoes. These stakeholders
have provided additional information regarding aldicarb usage (application methods and rates)
and the need for aldicarb use to remain in potato production. In particular, these stakeholders
noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth, resulting in increased yields when used on
potatoes.

Alternatives and Benefits
Page 34 of 191

-------
The Agency has determined that the benefits to growers of aldicarb use on potatoes are
very high in certain states (Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Florida) and that losing its use would
involve substantial costs to growers. There are also concerns with the potential for resistance if
aldicarb were not available. Several nematodes, including the root-knot nematode, the root
lesion nematode, and the stubby root nematode are major pests of potatoes and have wide host
ranges, making management with crop rotation difficult and relatively ineffective, although they
can be controlled by fumigants. Aldicarb may also be used to reduce root-knot nematode
populations that remain high after soil fumigation.

There are several alternatives for the use of aldicarb on potatoes, but none of these will be
an adequate substitute. Even if aldicarb is applied specifically to target nematodes, it is
inappropriate to ignore the beneficial effect of controlling insect pests, as well. For this reason,
an analysis of alternatives to aldicarb considered multiple chemicals so that both nematodes and
insects can be targeted.

Because of aldicarb's ability to control both nematodes and insect pests, alternatives to
aldicarb will consist of multiple chemicals used to target multiple pests. The estimates of
additional costs for using alternatives to aldicarb range from $77 - 257 per acre in the Pacific
Northwest, and $77 - 218 in Florida. It is clear that alternatives will involve significant costs to
growers who are currently using aldicarb.

For nematode control, the Agency believes that the most likely alternative to aldicarb is
the use of a fumigant, such as 1,3-D, although additional chemicals would be required to control
insect pests. While synthetic insecticides remain the most effective means for its control,
resistance by the Colorado potato beetle to all classes of insecticides has been documented in
many U.S. potato-producing regions. Widespread and locally diverse esfenvalerate and
phosmet resistance was detected in all counties in southern and eastern Idaho.

For additional information, refer to the Agency's complete alternative/quantitative impact
memo for potatoes which is available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located
on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/.

Mitigation
To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the registrant has
agreed, to develop the mitigation below to help address the above mentioned concerns:

• Modifications in label language to clarify the manner in which aldicarb is applied to
potatoes, and immediately covering with soil. For the label language modifications,
please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

-------
that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of
exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expected to be limited. The Agency recognizes,
however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on
potatoes and that losing its use would involve substantial costs to growers. Aldicarb also has
advantages to potato growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of
management, confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost
effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the
Agency finds the use on potatoes eligible for reregi strati on.
Soybean
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb is applied to soybean at planting. Aldicarb granules are applied within the row
furrow and buried along with the soybean seed at planting. The maximum application rate for
use on soybean is currently 3.0 Ibs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to soybean
(at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is
covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism
exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 157. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.4 to 37. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 2 to 53. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from
0.5 to 12. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the
potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Soybean
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to the written
comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received
comments from Bayer, USDA and soybean growers in Georgia, Minnesota and South Carolina
with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on soybeans.

Alternatives and Benefits
Aldicarb is used as a nematicide in late maturity soybean varieties grown in Georgia,
North Carolina, and South Carolina. Because there are few late maturity soybean varieties that
are resistant to nematodes (root-knot, reniform, and Columbian lance), growers of such varieties
depend more on aldicarb than growers of early maturity soybean varieties, for which nematode
resistant varieties exist. In South Carolina, approximately 60% of the soybean acreage has
nematode problems. The only available aldicarb alternative for nematode control, 1,3-D, is too
expensive for soybean production. Without aldicarb, soybean growers in the affected states
would stop growing soybeans or shift to very long rotations with other crops. Aldicarb,
therefore, is a critical tool for soybean growers.

Mitigation
Page 36 of 191

-------
To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency has directed, and the registrant has
agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns.
They include:

• Limiting the use to the following states: Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
• Reducing the application rate from 3.0 Ibs ai/A to 1.5 Ibs ai/A. This equates to a 50%
reduction when compared to the current label.
• Modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb in use and left on
the surface of the soil (i.e., clarifications in the use of positive displacement technology),
making it less available for the wildlife potentially at risk. For the label language
modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on soybeans in
Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and that losing its use would involve additional
costs to growers. Aldicarb also has advantages to soybean growers for which EPA cannot
estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of control in
the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of
pests and duration of control. Therefore, the Agency finds the use on soybeans eligible for
reregi strati on.
Sugar Beet
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb application to sugar beets currently consists of an at-plant and a side-dress
application. The at planting application is administered with the sugar beet seed and
immediately covered with soil. The side-dress application is usually administered after the sugar
beet has emerged from the soil and is applied along the side of the plant row in furrow and
immediately covered with soil.

Aldicarb is used to manage sugar beet root maggot, nematode, particularly sugar beet
cyst nematode, beet leafminer, beet leafhopper, aphids, flea beetles, wireworms, and cutworms,
primarily in Idaho.

The maximum application rate for use on sugar beet is currently 4.95 Ibs ai/A. Due to the
nature of how aldicarb is applied to sugar beet (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has
Page 37 of 191

-------
estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the
surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.
Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 190. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 65. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 3 to 64. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from
0.9 to 22. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the
potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Sugar Beet
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to the written
comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and
received comments from Bayer, American Sugarbeet Growers Association, Western Sugar
Cooperative, NYSSA-NAMPA Beet Growers Association, USD A, and other interested
stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to sugar beet production. These stakeholders have
provided additional information regarding aldicarb usage (application techniques and application
rates) and the need for aldicarb use to remain in sugar beet production. In particular, these
stakeholders also noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth, resulting in increased yields
when used on sugar beet.

Alternatives and Benefits
The Agency understands that aldicarb use on sugar beet is of great benefit to the sugar
beet industry, particularly in Western states, and that losing its use would involve substantial
costs to growers in those states. The available usage data indicate 75 percent of the sugar beet
acreage in Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington was treated with aldicarb in 2005. Aldicarb
is used primarily to manage sugar beet root maggot and nematodes on sugar beets, which are
major pests of sugar beets. If left uncontrolled, yield losses from sugar beet root maggot can be
as much as 80%. Yield losses from nematodes can be equally as devastating to a sugar beet
crop.

For insect control, sugar beet root maggot is a major pest of sugar beets and aldicarb
effectively controls both adults and larvae. If aldicarb were not available for the control of sugar
beet maggot, growers would likely use terbufos which is not as effective on both the adult fly
and larvae. Additionally, EPA has required, and the terbufos registrant has agreed, to a phased
approach that will ultimately reduce sales of terbufos by 55% by 2008. Other pesticides
available and used to a lesser extent than aldicarb and terbufos include phorate, chlorpyrifos, and
carbofuran. Phorate controls larvae but is mostly used in areas with low pest pressure.
Carbofuran was available in Idaho and Oregon under 24c labels to control larvae but does not
have a long residual value. Further, the Agency expects to initiate action in the near future to
cancel all uses of carbofuran. Esfenavalerate and zeta-cypermethrin control adult flies but
another insecticide would need to be used to control larvae. For nematodes, only fumigants are
available for control besides aldicarb but are significantly more expensive than aldicarb.
Page 38 of 191

-------
For nematode control specifically, only fumigants are available as alternatives, such as
1,3-D. A major disadvantage to using 1,3-D is the chemical cost relative to aldicarb (see below).
Another disadvantage of using 1,3-D is that growers must wait for the soil to warm before
fumigating, and then wait for the gas to dissipate before planting, shortening the growing season.
Growers would also need to consider the added costs due to different application equipment
using 1,3-D.

The estimates of costs for using aldicarb alternatives are more than $20 per treatment per
acre to control the sugar beet root maggot and approximately $88 to control nematodes. For
comparison, the cost of aldicarb is about $40 per acre. This assumes that the alternatives are
equally efficacious. Although the alternatives for control of the sugar beet root maggot appear to
be less expensive, other considerations may preclude their use. If the alternatives are less
effective than aldicarb, yield or quality impacts could also occur. In addition, if multiple pests
targeted by aldicarb are present, multiple chemicals/applications may be needed to achieve a
similar level of control.

For additional information, refer to the Agency's response to Phase 5 comments found
EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/.

• Limit use to the following states: California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska,
Oregon, Washington and Wyoming.
• Modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the surface
of the soil (i.e., clarifications in the use of positive displacement technology) and making
it less available for the wildlife potentially at risk. For the label language modifications,
please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on
sugar beets in certain states (California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon,
Washington and Wyoming) and that losing its use would involve substantial costs to growers.
Aldicarb also has advantages to sugar beet growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values,
such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected
Page 39 of 191

-------
infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of
control. Therefore, the Agency finds the use on sugar beet eligible for reregi strati on.
Sweet Potato
Current Use Pattern
Aldicarb application to sweet potato typically consists of an at-plant application using
positive displacement equipment. Aldicarb granules are applied within the row furrow and
buried along with the seed piece at planting to a depth of four to eight inches. The sweet potato
plant absorbs aldicarb through its roots and once in the plant, the residual activity of aldicarb
protects the treated plant against pest nematodes and insects for six to eight weeks. The
maximum application rate for use on sweet potato is currently 3.0 Ibs ai/A. Due to the nature of
how aldicarb is applied to sweet potatoes (at a depth of 4 to 8 inches), the Agency has estimated
that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for
potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation
RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 1 to 125. RQs modeled for
birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 58. RQs modeled for mammals using
maximum rates range from 2 to 42. RQs modeled for mammals using typical rates range from
0.8 to 20. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency's assessment also suggests the
potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Sweet Potato
During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participation Process, in addition to receiving written
comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received
comments from Bayer, USD A, and other interested stakeholders relating to aldicarb use on sweet
potato. These stakeholders have provided additional information regarding aldicarb usage
(application and application rates) and the need for aldicarb use to remain in sweet potato
production.

Alternatives and Benefits
The Agency understands that aldicarb use on sweet potatoes is of benefit in the states of
Louisiana and Mississippi and that losing aldicarb's use would involve substantial cost to
growers. It is a very important tool for sweet potato growers where nematode pressure is
present. Alternatives include 1,3-D, oxamyl and ethoprop, but they do not, however, control a
particular pest, the reniform nematode, as well as aldicarb. This nematode causes smaller,
misshapen sweet potatoes that cannot be marketed and aldicarb is the only tool which completely
controls this pest species. Not controlling nematodes may result in 100% yield loss, and partial
control can yield poor quality sweet potatoes, which if sold on the processing market, will only
bring 10% of the prices of marketable sweet potatoes.

-------
• Limit application of aldicarb to: Louisiana and Mississippi only.
• Addition of label language specifying granules be applied in a 12-inch band within an
open furrow and covered immediately during bed forming by mechanically hilling 8 to
10 inches.
• Slight modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the
surface of the soil (i.e., clarifications in the use of positive displacement technology) and
making it less available for the wildlife potentially at risk. For the label language
modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on
sweet potatoes in certain states (Louisiana and Mississippi) and that losing its use would involve
substantial costs to growers. Aldicarb also has advantages to sweet potato growers for which
EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of
control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full
range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the Agency finds the use on sweet potatoes
eligible for reregi strati on.

4. Other Labeling Requirements

In order to be eligible for reregi strati on, additional aldicarb information needs to be
included in the labeling of all end-use products containing aldicarb. Uses and use patterns need
to be clarified as indicated in Table 5 below to reflect and better describe actual use patterns for
aldicarb. For the specific label statements and a list of additional data requirements necessary to
confirm this decision, refer to Section V of this IRED document.

5. Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations

The Agency's screening level risk assessment for endangered and threatened species
concluded that use of aldicarb has direct adverse effects on listed species in the following
taxonomic groups: terrestrial invertebrates, birds, terrestrial phase amphibians, reptiles,
mammals, freshwater fish, freshwater invertebrates, estuarine/marine invertebrates, and
estuarine/marine fish. There is also the potential for indirect adverse effects for listed species in
multiple taxonomic groups that are dependent upon species that do experience direct adverse
effects. These findings are based solely on EPA's screening level assessment and do not
constitute "may affect" findings under the Endangered Species Act.
Page 41 of 191

-------
       The Agency has developed the Endangered Species Protection Program to identify
pesticides whose use may cause adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species and to
implement mitigation measures that address these impacts. The Endangered Species Act
requires Federal agencies to ensure that their actions are not likely to jeopardize listed  species or
adversely modify designated critical habitat.  To analyze the potential of registered pesticide uses
that may affect any particular species, EPA uses basic toxicity and exposure data developed for
REDs and considers it in relation to individual species by evaluating important ecological
parameters, pesticide use information, the geographic relationship between specific pesticide
uses and species locations, and biological requirements and behavioral aspects of the particular
species.  When conducted, this species-specific analysis will take into consideration any  risk
mitigation measures that are being implemented at the time as a result of this RED.

       Following this future species-specific analysis, a determination that there is a likelihood
of potential effects to a listed  species or its critical habitat may result in further limitations on use
of aldicarb, other measures to mitigate any potential  effects, or consultations with the Fish and
Wildlife  Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries as appropriate.  If the Agency determines
use of aldicarb "may affect" listed species or their designated critical habitat, EPA will employ
the provisions in the Services regulations  (50 CFR Part 402).  Until  a species-specific analysis is
completed, the risk mitigation measures being implemented through this RED (e.g., rate
reductions and geographic restrictions) will reduce the likelihood that endangered and  threatened
species may be exposed to aldicarb at levels of concern. EPA is not requiring specific aldicarb
label language at the present time relative to threatened and endangered species.  If, in the future,
specific measures are necessary for the protection of listed species, the Agency will implement
them through the Endangered Species Protection Program.

       EPA is currently engaging in informal consultations with the Fish and Wildlife Service
and the National Marine Fisheries Service, which is a part of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.  This means that the Agencies are working together to conduct a
full endangered species assessment for aldicarb, which is separate from this RED.  The
likelihood of potential impacts to endangered species will need to be assessed for all counties in
which: 1) crops registered for aldicarb use are grown; and 2) contain habitat for at least one listed
species.
                                      Page 42 of 191

-------
V. What Registrants Need to Do

The Agency has determined that products containing the active ingredient aldicarb are
eligible for reregi strati on provided that the risk mitigation measures outlined in this document
are adopted and label amendments are made to reflect these measures. The Agency intends to
issue DCIs for generic (technical grade) data and product-specific data. Generally, registrants
will have 90 days from receipt of a generic DCI to complete and submit response forms or
request time extension and/or waiver requests with a full written justification. The DCIs will
include specific requirements and instructions on how to respond. Table 4 below presents the
additional generic data the Agency intends to require for aldicarb to confirm the decision that
products containing the active ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregi strati on. For product-
specific DCIs, registrants will have eight months from receipt of the DCI to submit data and to
submit amended labels. In order for products containing the active ingredient aldicarb to be
eligible for reregi strati on, all product labels must be amended to incorporate the specific changes
and language presented in Table 5 below. Table 5 also describes how the required language
should be incorporated.

A. Manufacturing-Use Products

1. Additional Generic Data Requirements
The generic database supporting the reregi strati on of aldicarb has been reviewed and
determined to be substantially complete. However, EPA is requiring the following additional
data to confirm the decisions presented in this RED. The Agency intends to issue a generic DCI
for this data.

Table 4. Data requirements for the reregistration of aldicarb.
Data Requirement
Magnitude of the Residue in Plant Studies
Data depicting the magnitude of aldicarb residues of concern in cotton gin
byproducts are required in accordance with Table 1 of OPPTS Series 860
Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines, 8/96.
Terrestrial Plant Toxicity - Tier 1 (seedling emergence)
Terrestrial Plant Toxicity - Tier 1 (vegetative Vigor)
Aquatic Plant toxicity Test - using Lemna spp. - Tiers I and II
Avian Reproduction Study in Quail
Avian Reproduction Study in Duck
UV/Visible Aborption
Comparative Cholinesterase Assay
New OPPTS Guideline Number
(GLN)
860.1500
850.4100
850.4150
850.4400
850.2300
830.7050
Special Study
2. Labeling for Manufacturing-Use Products

To ensure compliance with FIFRA, labeling for all manufacturing-use products (MUPs)
should be revised to comply with all current EPA regulations, PR Notices, and applicable
policies. The MUP labeling should bear the specific language presented in Table 5 below.
Page 43 of 191

-------
       B. End-Use Products

              1. Additional Product-Specific Data Requirements

       Section 4(g)(2)(B) of FIFRA calls for the Agency to obtain any needed product-specific
data regarding the pesticide after a determination of eligibility has been made. The registrant
must review previous data submissions to ensure they meet current EPA acceptance criteria and
if not, commit to conduct new studies.  If a registrant believes that previously submitted data
meet current testing standards, then the study MRID numbers can be cited according to the
instructions in the Requirement Status and Registrations Response Form provided for each
product.  The Agency intends to issue a separate product-specific DCI outlining specific data
requirements.

              2. Labeling for End-Use Products

       To be eligible for reregi strati on, labeling changes are necessary to implement measures
outlined in Section IV above.  The specific changes and language are presented in Table 5 below.
Generally, conditions for the distribution and sale of products bearing old labels/labeling will be
established when the label changes are approved. However, specific existing stocks time frames
will be established case-by-case, depending on the number of products involved, the number of
label changes, and other factors.
                                     Page 44 of 191

-------
Table 5. Summary of Required Labeling Changes for Aldicarb Products.
 Description
Amended Labeling Language for Manufacturing Use Products
Placement on Label
 For all
 Manufacturing Use
 Products
 "Only for formulation into an insecticide/nematicide for the following uses:  citrus,
cotton, dry bean, peanuts, potatoes, soybean, sugar beets, sweet potatoes."

"Only formulation into low dust granular products such as products that use a vinyl binder
coating to adhere the aldicarb to either a corn cob grit or a gypsum substrate.  Binding
aldicarb to clay substrate is prohibited."
Directions for Use
 Note to Registrant
This product may not be used to formulate products for use on alfalfa grown for seed,
coffee, ornamentals, pecans, sorghum, sugarcane, and tobacco.
 One of these
 statements may be
 added to a label to
 allow reformulation
 of the product for a
 specific use or all
 additional uses
 supported by a
 formulator or user
 group
 "This product may be used to formulate products for specific uses not listed on the MP
label if the formulator, user group, or grower has complied with U.S. EPA submission
requirements regarding support of such uses."

"This product may be used to formulate products for any additional uses not listed on the
MP label if the formulator, user group, or grower has complied with U.S. EPA submission
requirements regarding support of such uses."
Directions for Use
 Environmental
 Hazards Statements
 "This pesticide is extremely toxic to birds and mammals. This pesticide is toxic to fish and
aquatic invertebrates. Do not discharge effluent containing this product into lakes,
streams, ponds, estuaries, oceans, or other waters unless in accordance with the
requirements of a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and
the permitting authority has been notified in writing prior to discharge. Do not discharge
effluent containing this product to sewer systems without previously notifying the local
sewage treatment plant authority. For guidance contact your State Water Board or
Regional Office of the EPA."
Precautionary Statements
                                                          Page 45 of 191

-------
                                         End Use Products Intended for Occupational Use
Restricted Use
Pesticide
 "Restricted Use Pesticide"

"Due to acute oral toxicity and to ground water contamination. For retail sale to and use
only by Certified Applicators or persons under the direct supervision of a Certified
Applicator, and only for those uses covered by the Certified Applicator's certification."
This statement must
appear at the very top of
the label's front panel
[see 40 CFR
156.10(j)(2)(i) for more
information]. No other
wording or symbols
should appear above the
RUP statement.
PPE Requirements
Established by the
RED1 for low- dust
granular formulations
that are packaged in
closed loading and
application systems
(e.g., Lock 'nLoad,
Smartbox)
 "Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)"

"Some materials that are chemical-resistant to this product are" (registrant inserts correct
chemical-resistant material).  "If you want more options, follow the instructions for
category" [registrant inserts A,B,C,D,E,F,G,orH] "on an EPA chemical-resistance
category selection chart."

"All loaders, applicators, and other handlers must wear;
> long-sleeved shirts and long pants,
> shoes plus socks.

In addition, loaders and handlers cleaning equipment or spills must wear:
> chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material, and
> chemical-resistant apron.

See engineering controls section for additional requirements."
Immediately
following/below
Precautionary
Statements: Hazards to
Humans and Domestic
Animals.
PPE Requirements
Established by the
RED1 for granular
 "Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)"

"Some materials that are chemical-resistant to this product are" (registrant inserts correct
Immediately
following/below
Precautionary
                                                         Page 46 of 191

-------
low- dust
formulations that are
not packaged in a
closed loading and
application system.
chemical-resistant material).  "If you want more options, follow the instructions for
category" [registrant inserts A,B,C,D,E,F,G,or H] "on an EPA chemical-resistance
category selection chart."

"All loaders, applications and other handlers must wear at a minimum:
> coveralls over long-sleeved shirts and long pants,
> chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material,
> chemical-resistant footwear plus  socks, and
> protective eyewear.

In addition, loaders and handlers cleaning equipment or spills must wear:
> chemical-resistant apron, and
> a NIOSH-approved respirator with a dust/mist filter with MSHA/ NIOSH approval
number prefix TC-21C or any N, R, P, or HE filter."

"See engineering controls for additional options."	
Statements: Hazards to
Humans and Domestic
Animals.
User Safety
Requirements
 "Follow manufacturer's instructions for cleaning/maintaining PPE. If no such instructions
for washables exist, use detergent and hot water. Keep and wash PPE separately from
other laundry."
Precautionary
Statements: Hazards to
Humans and Domestic
Animals immediately
following the PPE
requirements.	
Engineering Controls
for granular low-
dust formulations
that are packaged in
closed loading and
application systems
(e.g., Lock 'n Load,
Smartbox)
"Engineering Controls"

"This product is formulated into a (registrant inserts the trade name of the closed system in
which the product is marketed, such as Lock 'NLoad or SmartBox) system that meets the
definition of a closed loading and application system in the Worker Protection Standard for
Agricultural Pesticides [40 CFR 170.240(d)(4)]. Loaders and applicators using the closed-
system packaging must:
~  wear the personal protective equipment required in the PPE section of this labeling for
loaders during loading, and
—  wear the personal protective equipment required in the PPE section of this labeling for
Precautionary
Statements: Hazards to
Humans and Domestic
Animals  (Immediately
following PPE and User
Safety Requirements.)
                                                         Page 47 of 191

-------
                      applicators during applying, and
                      ~ be provided, have immediately available, and use in an emergency, such as a broken
                      package, spill, or equipment breakdown: chemical-resistant gloves, chemical-resistant
                      apron, chemical-resistant footwear, protective eyewear, and aNIOSH-approved respirator
                      with a dust/mist filter with MSHA/NIOSH approval number prefix TC-21C or any N R, P,
                      or HE filter."
Engineering
Controls: Enclosed
Cabs for Ground
Applicators
 "Engineering Control Options for Enclosed Cabs:

Applicators using an enclosed cab that meets the definition in the Worker Protection
Standard for Agricultural Pesticides [40 CFR 170.240(d)(5)] may wear reduced personal
protective equipment, provided they:
 ~ wear a long-sleeve shirt, long pants, shoes, and socks
~ are provided, have immediately available, and use in an emergency, such as a broken
package, spill,  or equipment breakdown: chemical-resistant gloves, chemical-resistant
apron, chemical-resistant footwear, protective eyewear, and aNIOSH-approved respirator
with a dust/mist filter with MSHA/NIOSH approval number prefix TC-21C or any N R, P,
or HE filter.
~ take off any  PPE that was worn in the treated area before  reentering the cab, and
~ store all such PPE in a chemical-resistant container, such  as a plastic bag, to prevent
contamination  of the inside of the cab."
Precautionary
Statements: Hazards to
Humans and Domestic
Animals  (Immediately
following PPE and User
Safety Requirements.)
User Safety
Recommendations
"User Safety Recommendations"

"Users should wash hands before eating, drinking, chewing gum, using tobacco, or using
the toilet.

Users should remove clothing/PPE immediately if pesticide gets inside.  Then wash
thoroughly and put on clean clothing.

Users should remove PPE immediately after handling this product. Wash the outside of
gloves before removing.  As soon as possible, wash thoroughly and change into clean
clothing."
Precautionary Statements
under:  Hazards to
Humans and Domestic
Animals immediately
following Engineering
Controls

(Must be placed in a
box.)
Environmental
                      "This pesticide is extremely toxic to birds and wildlife.  Birds feeding on exposed granules
                                                                                   Precautionary Statements
                                                         Page 48 of 191

-------
Hazards
may be killed. Cover or immediately soil incorporate granules spilled during loading."

"This pesticide is toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Run-off from treated areas may
be hazardous to fish in neighboring areas. Do not apply directly to water, to areas where
surface water is present or to inter-tidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not
contaminate water when disposing of equipment wash waters."

"This product is toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment. Do not apply this product while
bees are actively visiting the treatment area."

"Aldicarb is known to leach through soil into ground water under certain conditions as a
result of labeled use. Use of this chemical in areas where soils are permeable, particularly
where the water table is shallow, may result in ground-water contamination."

"See use directions for individual crops for additional ground water restrictions. See soil
tables."
immediately following
the User Safety
Recommendations
Environmental
Hazards Statements
Required by the
RED and Agency
Label Policies
"Under the Endangered Species Act, it is a Federal Offense to use any pesticide in a
manner that results in the death of a member of an endangered species.

This Act protects Attwater's Greater Prairie Chicken in the Texas counties of Aransas,
Austin, Brazoria, Colorado, Galveston, Goliad, Harris, Refugio, and Victoria.

Prior to making applications in these counties, the user must determine that this species is
not located in or immediately adjacent to the area to be treated. If the user is in doubt
whether or not the above named endangered species may be affected, he should contact
either the regional U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service office (Endangered Species Specialist) or
personnel of the State Fish and Game office."
Precautionary Statements
Page 49 of 191

-------
Restricted-Entry
Interval for products
with directions for
use within scope of
the Worker
Protection Standard
for Agricultural
Pesticides (WPS)
 "Do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted entry interval
(REI) of 48 hours."

"Exception: If the product is soil-incorporated or soil-injected, the Worker Protection
Standard, under certain circumstances, allows workers to enter the treated area if there will
be no contact with anything that has been treated."
Agricultural Use
Requirements Box
Early Entry Personal
Protective Equipment
for products with
directions for use
within the scope of
the WPS
 "PPE required for early entry to treated areas that is permitted under the Worker
Protection Standard and that involves contact with anything that has been treated, such as
plants, soil, or water, is:
* coveralls worn over long-sleeve shirt and long pants,
* chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material,
* chemical-resistant footwear plus socks, and
* protective eyewear."
Direction for Use
Agricultural Use
Requirements box
Double notification
requirement
 "Notify workers of the application by warning them orally and by posting warning signs
at entrances to treated areas."
Agricultural Use
Requirements Box
General Application
Restrictions
"Do not apply this product in a way that will contact workers or other persons, either
directly or through drift. Only protected handlers may be in the area during application."
Place in the Direction for
Use directly above the
Agricultural Use Box.
Other Application
Restrictions for all
products	
 "Application must be made using a motorized ground spreader.  Application using
aircraft, handheld, backpack spreaders, or push-type spreaders is prohibited."
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
Other Application
Restrictions for
products with
directions for use on
Citrus
CITRUS
The maximum single application rate is 4.95 Ibs ai/A.
Do not make more than one application per tree per use season.
Do not allow livestock to graze in treated area.
The Preharvest Interval is 30 days.
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
                                                          Page 50 of 191

-------
(Note: The maximum
allowable application
rate and maximum
allowable seasonal
rate must be listed as
pounds or gallons of
formulated product
per acre, not just as
pounds active
ingredient per acre.)
All application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement
Metering Units.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure
the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
Granules must be place into bottom of the seed furrow and immediately covered with at
least 2 inches of soil by mechanical means.

For Mature Citrus Trees: "apply in a band along the drip line on both sides of tree row.
Apply granules in 3 to 6 furrows that are 2 to 3 inches deep and spaced on approximately
12 inch centers. Immediately cover with soil by mechanical means. The width of each
band should equal 1/4 the tree row spacing."
OR
For furrow irrigation applications to mature citrus, "apply granules 2 to 3 inches deep in
the irrigation furrow using 2 shanks per furrow."

For Immature Citrus Trees (1-2 years old): "0.3 oz ai/tree (do not exceed 4.95 Ibs ai/acre).
Apply granules in a furrow beside individual trees and cover with at least 2 inches of soil."
Other Application
Restrictions for
products with
directions for use on
Cotton

(Note: The maximum
allowable application
rate and maximum
allowable seasonal
rate must be listed as
pounds or gallons of
formulated product
per acre, not just as
pounds active
ingredient per acre.)
COTTON
The maximum single at-plant application rate is 1.5 Ibs ai/A.
The maximum single side-dress (post-emergence) application rate is 2.1 Ibs ai/A.
Do not exceed a total of 3.6 Ibs ai/A per year.
Do not make more than one at-plant application and one post-emergence application per
crop.
Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.
Do not feed cotton forage to livestock or allow livestock to graze in treated area.
If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground surface,
assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure
the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.

At Planting: "Apply granules in the seed furrow and immediately cover with soil by
mechanical means.
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
Page 51 of 191

-------
OR
If rate exceeds 1.05 Ibs ai/A on 40 inch rows, "apply granules in a 4 to 6 inch band (T-
band) over open seed furrow and immediately cover by mechanical means."

At First Squaring: "Apply side dress granules in a furrow that is 6 to 10 inches to one or
both sides of the plant row to a depth of 2 to 3 inches."
Other Application
Restrictions for
products with
directions for use on
Dry Bean

(Note: The maximum
allowable application
rate and maximum
allowable seasonal
rate must be listed as
pounds or gallons of
formulated product
per acre, not just as
pounds active
ingredient per acre.)
DRY BEANS (other than soybeans)
For use in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Michigan only.
Do not exceed a total of 2.1 Ibs ai/A/season.
Do not make more than one application per crop.
Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.
Do not feed green forage, hay, or straw to livestock.
Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.
Do not use green pods as food for humans.
If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground surface,
assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.
Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is
completely covered with a layer of soil.

For all applications, except for where furrow irrigation is used: "Apply granules in seed
furrow and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means.
OR
Apply in a furrow that is 2 to 3 inches to the side of seed row and 2 to 3 inches deep in
seed furrow and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means.
OR
Apply granules on a 4 to 6 inch band over open furrow and immediately cover with soil by
mechanical means. Plant into treated zone."

When furrow irrigation is used: "apply granules 3 to 4 inches deep and 3 inches from the
seed row on the water furrow side and immediate cover with soil by mechanical means."
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
Other Application
Restrictions for
PEANUT
Do not exceed a total of 3.0 Ibs ai/A/season
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Page 52 of 191

-------
products with
directions for use on
Peanut

(Note: The maximum
allowable application
rate and maximum
allowable seasonal
rate must be listed as
pounds or gallons of
formulated product
per acre, not just as
pounds active
ingredient per acre.)
Do not harvest within 90 days of application.
Do not hog-off treated fields.
Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.
Do not feed hay or vines to livestock.
Post-emergence applications can only be used in fields where overhead irrigation is
available.
Do not make more than one application per crop in states other than Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia.
Do not make the split application to Spanish peanuts or other short season varieties (a
minimum of 90 days is required between pegging applications and harvest).
If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in AL, GA and SC and a vulnerable soil is present and the
water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a
drinking water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground level or a
minimum of 30 feet below the water table. If it is not known whether the water table is
greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet
below ground surface.
If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in Florida and a vulnerable soil is present (see soils listed
below), and the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface, do not apply within
500 feet of a drinking water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground
level or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. In Florida, it is the responsibility of
the applicator to document the construction of wells claimed not to be shallow. This must
consist of: (a) a copy of the well completion report issued by the appropriate water
management district; or (b) a statement certified as to accuracy by a licensed well
contractor. The U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service which serves your
county can tell you if the soils on your farm fall within the following types of vulnerable
soils. If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 feet below ground
surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure
the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.

Thrips At Planting: "Apply granules in seed furrow and immediately cover with soil by
mechanical means to a depth of 2 to 4 inches."

Nematodes At Planting: "Apply granules in a 4-6 inch band over open seed furrow (T-
Specific Use Pattern
Page 53 of 191

-------
band) and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means to a depth of 2 to 4 inches.
OR
Apply granules in a 6 to 12 inch band and immediately cover with soil by mechanical
means to a depth of 2 to 4 inches. Plant seed into treated zone."

At Pegging: "Apply granules in a band 12 to 18 inches wide on the row and into the plant
canopy. Ensure that plant foliage is dry prior to application. Dislodge granules from
foliage by suitable means that will not damage the plant. Application must be made late in
the afternoon or early evening, immediately followed by irrigation, and completed within
24 hours unless rainfall is received."
Other Application
Restrictions for
products with
directions for use on
Potato

(Note: The maximum
allowable application
rate and maximum
allowable seasonal
rate must be listed as
pounds or gallons of
formulated product
per acre, not just as
pounds active
ingredient per acre.)
POTATOES
For use only in the states of Florida, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington; in Utah in
the counties of Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon, Davis, Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute,
Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Ulntah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber; and in
Nevada in the counties of Humboldt and Pershing.
Do not exceed 3.0 Ibs ai/A/season.
All applications must be made with Positive Displacement Applicators such as Horstine
Microband® or Gandy PDM® or with other Positive Displacement Applicators approved
under the Bayer CropScience Equipment Certification Program. The applicator must be
certified through the Bayer CropScience Stewardship program.
Do not harvest within 100 days of application for potatoes grown in Florida and within 150
days of application for potatoes grown in the Pacific Northwest (Idaho, Montana, Oregon,
Washington, and certain counties in Nevada and Utah).
Do not apply after planting.
Do not make more than one application per crop. If replanting is necessary, do not retreat
the second crop with (registrant insert brand name).
Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.
In state other than Florida, do not use furrow irrigation on aldicarb-treated potatoes.
Do not use this product on potatoes in any state other than those immediately listed above.
If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground surface,
assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.
Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is
completely covered with a layer of soil.
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
Page 54 of 191

-------
At Planting: "Apply granules in a 6 inch band and immediately cover with 4 to 8 inches of
soil by mechanical means. Plant seed pieces into treated zone.
OR
Apply granules in furrow with seed piece. Immediately cover with 4 to 8 inches of soil by
mechanical means."
Other Application
Restrictions for
products with
directions for use on
Soybean

(Note: The maximum
allowable application
rate and maximum
allowable seasonal
rate must be listed as
pounds or gallons of
formulated product
per acre, not just as
pounds active
ingredient per acre.)
SOYBEAN
For use on soybeans grown only in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
Do not exceed a total of 1.5 Ibs ai/A/season.
Do not make more than one application per crop.
Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.
Do not allow livestock to graze in treated areas before harvest.
Do not feed green forage, hay or straw to livestock.
If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground surface,
assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.
Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is
completely covered with a layer of soil.

At Planting: "Apply granules in seed furrow and immediately cover with soil by
mechanical means.
OR
If rate exceeds 0.9 Ibs ai/A on 30 inch rows, "Apply a 4 to 6 inch band over open seed
furrow and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means."
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
Other Application
Restrictions for
products with
directions for use on
Sugar Beet

(Note: The maximum
allowable application
SUGAR BEETS
For use only in California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington, and
Wyoming.
The total maximum rate per crop cycle is 4.95 Ibs ai/A.
Do not make more than one at-planting application and two post-emergence applications
per crop.
Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.
If tops are to be fed to livestock, do not apply within 120 days of harvest."
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
Page 55 of 191

-------
rate and maximum
allowable seasonal
rate must be listed as
pounds or gallons of
formulated product
per acre, not just as
pounds active
ingredient per acre.)
Do not use tops as food to humans.
If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground surface,
assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure
the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.

Nematodes At Planting: "Apply granules in a 4 to 6 inch band and immediately cover with
soil by mechanical means. Plant seed into or above treated zone.
OR
where furrow irrigation is employed for seed germination, drill granules 3 to 4 inches deep
and 3 inches from seed row on water furrow side."

Aphids. Leafminers and Leafhoppers At Planting: "Drill granules 1 to 3 inches below
seedline."

Sugar Beet Root Maggot At Planting: "Apply granules in a 2 to 3 inch band over seed row
and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means.
OR
where furrow irrigation is employed for seed germination, drill granules
2 inches deep and 2 inches from seed row on water furrow side.
For the 7 Ib. rate, apply granules in a 1 to 2 inch band in front of the press wheel as the
furrow is closing."

Post-emergence: "Apply granules to both sides of plant row and immediately cover with
soil by mechanical means.
OR
for furrow irrigation side-dress granules 4 to 8 inches to water furrow side of plant
row at furrow depth. Irrigate soon after application. Apply within 60 days after
planting."
Other Application
Restrictions for
products with
SWEET POTATOES
For use in Louisiana and Mississippi only.
Maximum application rate is 3 pounds ai/A/crop.
Directions for Use
Associated with the
Specific Use Pattern
Page 56 of 191

-------
 directions for use on
 Sweet Potato

 (Note: The maximum
 allowable application
 rate and maximum
 allowable seasonal
 rate must be listed as
 pounds or gallons of
 formulated product
 per acre, not just as
 pounds active
 ingredient per acre.)
Do not make more than one application per crop.
Do not harvest within 120 days of application.
Do not feed sweet potato vines to livestock.
Application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement
Metering Units. Apply granules in a 12-inch band open furrow.  Immediately cover
granules by mechanical hilling soil at least 8 to 10 inches.
If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground
surface, assume that the water table is less than 25  feet below ground surface.
Immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is
completely covered with a layer of soil.

Pre-plant or At Planting:  "Apply granules in a 12-inch band open furrow or soil surface
and cover immediately during bed forming by mechanically hilling up 8 to 10 inches.
Place transplant in center of treated zone."	
 PPE that is established on the basis of Acute Toxicity of the end-use product must be compared to the active ingredient PPE in this document. The more protective PPE must be placed in the product
labeling. For guidance on which PPE is considered more protective, see PR Notice 93-7.
                                                            Page 57 of 191

-------
Appendix A. Aldicarb Uses and Use-Patterns Eligible for Reregistration
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate

Form
Code(s)

Max.
Seasonal
Rate

Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr

MRI

REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
CITRUS
(Oranges,
Grapefruit,
Lemons, and
Limes only)
30 day(s) preharvest interval.
All application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement
Metering Units.
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze livestock in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Endangered species restriction.
For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present or
to inter-tidal areas below the mean high water mark.
Ground water restriction.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
Geographic disallowable: CA, CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Curry
County, OR.
Foliar
Soil in-furrow
treatment /Soil
shanking
treatment /Soil
treatment.
Granule
applicator.
4.95
Ibai/A

4.95
Ibai/A

4.95
Ib ai/cc

1/1 cc

48 h

COTTON
(UNSPECIFIED)
90 day(s) preharvest interval.
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Page 58 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate


Form
Code(s)




Max.
Seasonal
Rate



Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr



MRI





REI






PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not feed forage to livestock
or allow livestock to graze in treated areas.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Endangered species restriction.
For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present or
to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.
Ground water restriction.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic  to birds,  fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or
Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry  County, OR.
At planting
Band treatment
/Soil band
treatment /Soil
drill treatment
/Soil in-furrow
treatment.
Granule
applicator.
At first squaring
Soil sidedress
treatment. Granule
applicator.
Squaring
through early
bloom
Soil in-furrow
treatment /Soil
sidedress
treatment.
1.5
Ibai/A







2.1
Ibai/A


2.1
Ibai/A




G







G


G




3.6
Ibai/A

3.6
Ib ai/cc




3.7
Ibai/A

3.6
Ib ai/cc
3.8
Ibai/A
3.6
Ib ai/cc


2/cc







2/cc


2/cc




NS







NS


NS




48 h







48 h


48 h




















                         Page 59 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
Granule
applicator.
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate

Form
Code(s)

Max.
Seasonal
Rate

Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr

MRI

REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)

BEANS, DRIED-
TYPE
90 day(s) preharvest interval.
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.
Do not feed green forage, hay, or straw to livestock.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze livestock in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Do not use green pods as food for humans.
Endangered species restriction.
For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present or
to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.
Ground water restriction.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to
ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
Geographic allowable: ID, MI, OR, WA only.
Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or
Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.
At planting
Soil band
treatment /Soil in-
furrow treatment.
Granule
applicator.
2.1
Ibai/A

2.1
Ibai/A

2.1
Ib ai/cc

1/1 cc

48 h

PEANUTS
(UNSPECIFIED)
90 day(s) preharvest interval.
Do not make more than one application per crop in states other than AL, FL, GA, NC, OK,
TX, and VA.
Do not make split application to Spanish peanuts or other short season varieties.
Page 60 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate

Form
Code(s)

Max.
Seasonal
Rate

Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr

MRI

REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.
Do not feed hay or vines to livestock.
Do not feed treated hay or vines to livestock.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze livestock in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not hog down treated fields.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Drift and runoff may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
Endangered species restriction.
For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present or
to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.
Ground water restrictions: If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in AL, GA and SC and a
vulnerable soil is present and the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface, do not
apply within 500 feet of a drinking water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below
ground level or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. If it is not known whether the
water table is greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that the water table is less
than 25 feet below ground surface. If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in Florida and a vulnerable
soil is present (see soils listed below), and the water table is less than 25 feet below ground
surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a drinking water well unless wells are either cased to
100 feet below ground level or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. In Florida, it is the
responsibility of the applicator to document the construction of wells claimed not to be
shallow. This must consist of: (a) a copy of the well completion report issued by the
appropriate water management district; or (b) a statement certified as to accuracy by a licensed
well contractor. The U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service which serves your
county can tell you if the soils on your farm fall within the following types of vulnerable soils.
If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume
that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Keep out of lakes, streams, and ponds.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
Page 61 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)

At planting
Soil band
treatment /Soil in-
furrow treatment.
Granule
applicator
At pegging
Soil band


















LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate
Form
Code(s)
plant corn, cucurbits, or fi
Geographic disallowable'
Humbolt counties in CA c
o
3
lbai/A




1.5
lbai/A


















G




G


















Max.
Seasonal
Rate
Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr
MRI
REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
uiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or
)r in Curry County, OR.
o
3
lbai/A

o
J
Ib ai/cc

3
lbai/A

3
Ib ai/cc















2/cc




2/cc


















NS




NS


















48 h




48 h
























Geographic
allowable:
AL, FL, GA,
NC, OK, TX,
and VA only.
Do not make
split
application
to Spanish
peanuts or
other short
season
varieties.
Ensure that
plant foliage
is dry prior
to
application.
Dislodge
granules
from foliage
by suitable
means that
will not
damage the
plant.
Irrigate
immediately
after
application
and complete
within 24
hours unless
rainfall is
received
Page 62 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate

Form
Code(s)

Max.
Seasonal
Rate

Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr

MRI

REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
POTATO
100 day(s) preharvest interval for potatoes grown in FL.
150 day(s) preharvest interval for potatoes grown in ID, MT, OR, WA, and certain counties in
NV (Humbolt and Pershing) and UT (Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon, Davis, Duchesne,
Iron, Millard, Plute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and
Weber).
All application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement
Metering Units.
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze livestock in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Endangered species restriction.
For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present or
to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.
Ground water restriction.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
Geographic allowable: FL, ID, MT, OR, WA, and certain counties in NV (Humbolt and
Pershing) and UT (Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon, Davis, Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute,
Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber).
Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or
Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.
At planting
Soil band
treatment /Soil
drill treatment
/Soil in-furrow
treatment.
Granule
applicator.
3
Ibai/A

3
Ibai/A

3
Ib ai/cc

1/cc

48 h

Page 63 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate

Form
Code(s)

Max.
Seasonal
Rate

Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr

MRI

REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
SOYBEANS
(UNSPECIFIED)
90 day(s) preharvest interval.
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Do not apply to any body of water.
Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.
Do not feed green forage, hay, or straw to livestock.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze livestock in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Endangered species restriction.
For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present or
to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.
Ground water restriction.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
Geographic allowable: GA, NC, and SC only.
Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or
Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.
At planting
Soil band
treatment /Soil
drill treatment
/Soil in-furrow
treatment.
Granule
applicator /Not on
label.
1.5
Ibai/A

1.5
Ibai/A

1.5
Ib ai/cc

1/cc

48 h

SUGAR BEET
120 day(s) preharvest interval if the tops are to be fed to livestock.
90 day(s) preharvest interval.
Page 64 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate

Form
Code(s)

Max.
Seasonal
Rate

Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr

MRI

REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze livestock in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Do not use tops as food for humans.
Endangered species restriction.
Ground water restriction.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
Geographic allowable: CA, CO, ID, MT, ME, OR, WA, and WY only.
Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or
Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.
Preplant
Soil band
treatment /Soil
drill treatment.
Granule
applicator.
At planting
Soil band
treatment /Soil
drill treatment
/Soil in-furrow
treatment /Soil
incorporated
treatment by
irrigation /Soil
sidedress
4.95
Ibai/A

4.95
Ibai/A

4.95
Ib ai/cc

4.95
Ibai/A

4.95
Ib ai/cc

3/cc

48 h

Page 65 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)
treatment.
Granule
applicator.
Postemergence
Soil in-furrow
treatment /Soil
incorporated
treatment by
irrigation /Soil
sidedress
treatment /Soil
treatment.
Granule
applicator.
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate

4.05
Ibai/A

Form
Code(s)

Max.
Seasonal
Rate

4.95
Ibai/A

4.95
Ib ai/cc

Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr

3/cc

MRI

REI

48 h

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)

SWEET
POTATO
120 day(s) preharvest interval.
All application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement
Metering Units.
Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves.
Do not allow the feeding of vines or grazing of foliage by livestock.
Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas
below the mean high water mark.
Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More
restrictive setbacks may apply.
Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.
Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste.
Do not contaminate water, food or feed.
Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.
Do not feed treated vines to livestock.
Do not graze dairy animals in treated areas.
Do not graze livestock in treated areas.
Do not graze meat animals in treated areas.
Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden.
Endangered species restriction.
For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas where surface water is present or
to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.
Ground water restriction.
Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches.
Proper ventilation required.
Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas.
This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.
This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife.
For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the
granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.
10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant
wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not
Page 66 of 191

-------
SITE NAME
Application
Equipment,
Timing, and
Type (for any
Reg.# at any
rate)

At planting
Soil band
treatment.
Granule
applicator.
LIMITATIONS
Max.
Single
Appl.
Rate
plant corn, c
Geographic
Geographic
Humbolt coi
3 Ib ai/A
Form
Code(s)
Max.
Seasonal
Rate
Max. #
Apps/
cc &yr
MRI
REI

PHI/PGI/PSI
Use
Limitations
(May not
apply to all
Reg. #s)
ucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes within 8 months after the last application.
allowable: LA and MS only.
disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or
unties in CA or in Curry County, OR.
G
3 Ib ai/A
3 Ib ai/cc
1/cc
NS
48 h


Page 67 of 191

-------
Appendix B. Table of Generic Data Requirements and Studies Used to Make the
Reregistration Decision

Guide to Appendix B

Appendix B contains listing of data requirements which support the reregi strati on for active
ingredients within case #0140 (aldicarb) covered by this RED. It contains generic data
requirements that apply to aldicarb in all products, including data requirements for which a
"typical formulation" is the test substance.

The data table is organized in the following formats:

1. Data Requirement (Column 1). The data requirements are listed in the order in which
they appear in 40 CFR part 158. The reference numbers accompanying each test refer to
the test protocols set in the Pesticide Assessment Guidance, which are available from the
National technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161
(703) 487-4650.

2. Use Pattern (Column 2). This column indicates the use patterns for which the data
requirements apply. The following letter designations are used for the given use patterns.

A. Terrestrial food
B. Terrestrial feed
C. Terrestrial non-food
D. Aquatic food
E. Aquatic non-food outdoor
F. Aquatic non-food industrial
G. Aquatic non-food residential
H. Greenhouse food
I. Greenhouse non-food
J. Forestry
K. Residential
L. Indoor food
M. Indoor non-food
N. Indoor medical
O. Indoor residential

3. Bibliographic Citation (Column 3). If the Agency has acceptable data in its files, this
column list the identify number of each study. This normally is the Master Record
Identification (MIRD) number, but may be a "GS" number if no MRID number has been
assigned. Refer to the Bibliography appendix (Appendix D) for a complete citation of
the study.
Page 68 of 191

-------
New Guideline
Number
Old Guideline
Number
Requirement
Use Pattern
Bibliographic Citation(s)
Product Chemistry
830.1550
830.1600
830.1620
830.1670
830.1700
830.1750
830.1800
830.6302
830.6303
830.6304
830.6313
830.6314
830.6315
830.6316
830.6317
830.6319
830.6320
830.7000
830.7050
830.7100
830.7200
830.7220
830.7300
830.7370
830.7550
830.7840
830.7950
61-1
61-2a
61-2b
61-2b
62-1
62-2
62-3
63-2
63-3
63-4
63-13
63-14
63-15
63-16
63.17
63-19
63-20
63-12
N/A
63-18
63-5
63-6
63-7
63-10
63-11
63-8
63-9
Product Identity and Composition
Start. Mat. & Mfg. Process
Description of Production Process
Discussion of Impurities
Preliminary Analysis
Certification of limits
Analytical Method
Color
Physical State
Odor
Stability temp and ions
Oxidation and Reduction
Flammability
Explodability
Storage stability
Miscibility
Corrosion Characteristics
PH
UV/Visible absorption
Viscosity
Melting point/melting range
Boiling point/range
Density
Dissociation Constants in Water
Partial Coefficient, shake flask
method
Water Solubility
Vapor Pressure
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
00152095 letter dated 8/12/86
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095 letter dated 8/12/86
00152095 letter dated 8/12/86
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095 Data Gap
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
00152095
Environmental Fate
835.2120
835.2240
161-1
161-2
Hydrolysis
Photodegradation Water
A,B,C
A,B,C
aldicarb: 00053377 00096547 00102011 00102048 00102057 00102072
00102065
sulfoxide: 00102066
aldicarb: 00102067 00102068 42498201
Page 69 of 191

-------
835.2410
835.4100
835.4400
835.4300
835.1240
835.6100
835.6200
161-3
162-1
162-3
162-4
163-1
164-1
164-2
Photodegradation Soil and Air
Aerobic Soil Metabolism
Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism
Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism
Leaching/ Adsorption/Desorption
Terrestrial Field Dissipation
Aquatic Field Dissipation
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
aldicarb: Waived
sulfoxide: Waived
sulfone: Waived
aldicarb: 00029989 00093641 00096968 00102050 00101915
00102051 00102054 00035365 00101934 00102071 00053366
00080820 00093640 00093642 43805702 44005001
sulfone: 00053370
aldicarb: 43805701
sulfoxide: 45592110
sulfone: 45592111
aldicarb: N/A
sulfoxide: 45592108
sulfone: 45592109
aldicarb: 00053380 00053381 00053385 00101915 00101939
00102079 42498202
sulfoxide: 43560301
sulfone: 43560302
aldicarb: 00036313 00053364 00068252 00080815 00101910
00101923 00101935 00101937 00102064 00101936 00101968
00102061 00102078
aldicarb: 00094799 00101940
Environmental Fate - Drinking Water Monitoring Data
835.7100
166-1
Prospective Ground water
Monitoring Study
A,B,C
46793702 46793703 46793704 46793705 46793706
Ecological Effects
850.2100
850.2200
850.2200
850.2300
850.2300
850.1075
850.1075
850.1010
71-la
71-2a
71-2b
71-4a
71-4b
72-la
72-lc
72-2a
Avian Oral LD50 Quail/Duck
Avian Dietary LC50 Quail
Avian Dietary LC50 Quail
Avian Reproduction Quail
Avian Reproduction Duck
Freshwater Fish LC50 Bluegill
(warm water)
Freshwater Fish LC50 Rainbow
trout (cold water)
Freshwater Invertebrate LC50
Daphnia magna
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
BOWOAL02io7398 (Beavers/1979)
00102132 1096727 (Beavers/1979)
096397 0022923 (Hill/1975)
Data Gap
Data Gap
40098001 3503 (Mayer and Ellersieck 1986)
40098001 (Mayer and Ellersieck 1986)
Ace #096683 (Vilkas/1977) Foranetal. 1985
Page 70 of 191

-------
850.1045
850.1025
850.1035
850.1400
850.1400
850.1300
850.1350

850.4100
850.4150
850.4400
850.3020
N/A
72-3a
72-3b
72-3c
72-4a
72-4a
72-4b
72-4b
123-2
N/A
N/A
122-2
141-1
N/A
Estuarine/Marine Fish LC50
Estuarine/Marine Mollusk EC50
Estuarine/Marine Shrimp EC50
Fish Early Life-Stage (freshwater)
Fish Early Life-Stage
(estuarine/marine)
Aquatic Invertebrate Life-Cycle
(freshwater)
Aquatic Invertebrate Life-Cycle
(estuarine/marine)
Aquatic Plant Growth
Terrestrial Plant Toxicity
(seedling emergence)
Terrestrial Plant Toxicity
(vegetative vigor)
Aquatic Plant Growth (Tier 2)
Honey Bee Acute Contact LD50
OECD, Section 2 #207
Earthworm Acute Toxicity Test
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
40228401 (USEPA/1986)
40228401 (USEPA/1986) 00066341 (USEPA/1981)
40228401 (USEPA/1986)
44598601 (Pickering and Gilliam 1982) 66341 (USEPA/1981)
44598601 (Pickering and Gilliam 1982) 66341 (USEPA/1981)
00066341 (USEPA/1981)
00066341 (USEPA/1981)
40228401 (USEPA/1986)
Data Gap
Data Gap
Data Gap
00036935 (Atkins/1975)
Mosleh (2003)
Residue Chemistry
860.1300
860.1300
860.1340
860.1340
860.1340
860.1360
171-4a
171-4b
171-4c
171-4d
171-4d
171-4m
Nature of Residue in Plants
Nature of Residue in Livestock
Residue Analytical Method plant
Residue Analytical Method
livestock
Residue Analytical Method
water/fish
Multiple Residue Methods
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
00053358 00053364 00053366 00053368 00085455 00101929
00101930 00101931 00101977 00101996 00102009 00102178
42436602-42436606 43902401
00053371 00053373 00080697 00080813 00101933 00101967
00159570 43084101
00025167 00036315 00069739 00069740 00101973 00101978
00101992 00101993 00101997 00101998 00101999 00102004
00102005 00102007 00104553 00135031 00140487 42436501
00101924 00101990 00101991
N/A
PAM Volume I Section 302 and 401
Page 71 of 191

-------
860.1380
860.1400
860.1460
860.1480
860.1480
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
171-4e
171-4h
171-41
171-4J
171-4J
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
Storage Stability Data
Nature and Magnitude of the
Residue in Water, Fish and
Irrigated Crops
Magnitude of the Residue in Food
Handling Establishments
Milk and the Fat, Meat, and Meat
Byproducts of Cattle, Goats,
Hogs, Horses, and Sheep
Eggs and the Fat, Meat, and Meat
Byproducts of Poultry
Magnitude of Residue (potato)
Magnitude of Residue (sugar
beet, roots)
Magnitude of Residue (sweet
potato)
Magnitude of Residue (sugar
beet, tops)
Magnitude of Residue (beans,
dry)
Magnitude of Residue (soybean,
seed and aspirated grain fractions)
Magnitude of Residue (soybean,
forage and soybean, hay)
Magnitude of Residue
(grapefruit)
Magnitude of Residue (lemon)
Magnitude of Residue (lime)
Magnitude of Residue (orange)
Magnitude of Residue (pecan)
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
PP#OF1008 PP#9F0798 PP#3F1414 pp#7E1996 PP#6F1953
PP#7F1995 PP#8F2107 PP#8F0637 PP#9F2201 PP#6E1792
PP#8F2096 FAP#6H5108 00159571 42467301 42467302
43844701 4384240143299005 43299006
N/A
N/A
00053372 00101967 PP#3F1414
00053373
00080815 00102012 00102014 00102172 00164424 42827802-
42827804 43299002 43385001
00035368 00035369 00101966
PP#7F1995 42722301
00035368 00035369 00101966
00135031
00135031
N/A
00102129 00148971
00102129
00102129
00036313 00102075 00102115 00102174 42004401 42016901
43110601
00140487
Page 72 of 191

-------
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1500
860.1520
860.1520
860.1520
860.1520
860.1520
860.1520
860.1520
860.1520
860.1520
860.1850
860.1900
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-4k
171-41
171-41
171-41
171-41
171-41
171-41
171-41
171-41
171-41
165-1
165-2
Magnitude of Residue (sorghum,
grain and aspirated grain
fractions)
Magnitude of Residue (sorghum,
forage and sorghum, stover
(fodder))
Magnitude of Residue (coffee,
bean)
Magnitude of Residue (cotton,
seed and cotton gin by-products)
Magnitude of Residue (peanut,
nutmeat and peanut, hulls)
Magnitude of Residue
(sugarcane)
Magnitude of Residue (tobacco)
Processed Food/Feed (citrus)
Processed Food/Feed (coffee,
bean)
Processed Food/Feed (cottonseed)
Processed Food/Feed (peanut)
Processed Food/Feed (potato)
Processed Food/Feed (sorghum)
Processed Food/Feed (soybean)
Processed Food/Feed (sugar beet)
Processed Food/Feed (sugarcane)
Confined rotational crops
Field rotational crops
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
PP#8F2107
PP#8F2107
00102024 PP#7F1953
00101977 00102061 PP#7F1995 PP#9F0798 Data Gap
00102013 PP#3F1414
00101923 PP#2F1188
00102179 00102180
00102114 00102130 00140001
PP#7F1953 00162562
00101977 00102061
00102123 PP#3F1414
00080815 00102012 00102014 00102172 00164424 00159572
42305801 42827801 43299004
PP#8F2107
00135031 00159573 40884601
00035368 00035369 00101966
00101923 PP#2F1188
42226201
42226201
Toxicology
870.1100
870.1200
870.1300
870.2400
870.2500
870.2600
870.3150
81-1
81-2
81-3
81-4
81-5
81-6
82- Ib
Acute Oral Toxicity Rat
Acute Dermal Toxicity Rabbit/Rat
Acute Inhalation Toxicity Rat
Primary Eye Irritation Rabbit
Primary Skin Irritation
Dermal Sensitization
13-Day Dietary Dog
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
00057333
00091241 00069916
00069916 00057333
00069916
00069916
N/A
41919901
Page 73 of 191

-------
870.3700a
870.3700b
870.3800
870.4100a
870.4 lOOb
870.4200
870.4300
870-5300
870.5385
870.5550
870.6200a
870.6200b
870.6300
870.7485
N/A
N/A
N/A
Special Study
83-3a
83 -3b
83-4
83-1
83-1
83-2
83-5

84-2
84-2




N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Developmental Toxicity
(Teratogenicity) Rat
Developmental Toxicity
(Teratogenicity) Rabbit
2-Generation Reproduction Rat
Chronic Toxicity Rat
Chronic Toxicity Dog
Carcinogenicity Rat
Chronic Toxicity /Carcinogenicity
Mouse and Rat
Gene Mutation
Mammalian Cytogenetics: Bone
Marrow Chromosome Aberration
Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in
Mammalian Cells
Acute Neurotoxicity Screening
Battery
Subchronic Neurotoxicity
Screening Battery
Developmental Neurotoxicity
Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
Rat Dominant Lethal Study
Special Neurotoxicity Studies:
Moser VC
Acute Oral Study (Human)
Inveresk
Comparative Cholinesterase
Assay
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
A,B,C
41004501
0132668
42148401
43045401
40695401 42191501
43045401
00044732 00044733 00044734
00148168
41661301 41663102
00141673
43442301
43829602
43829601
00102022 00102023
43575101
45068601 (1999) TAP 157 94-106
42373001 (1992)
46131001 (supplementary report)
Data Gap
Occupational/Residue Exposure
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Aldicarb Specific Study
Terbufos Study
A,B,C
A,B,C
43852501
44793301
Page 74 of 191

-------
Appendix C. Technical Support Documents

Additional documentation in support of this RED is maintained in the OPP docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-
0253.  This docket may be accessed in the OPP docket room located at Room S-4900, One Potomac Yard,
2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. It is open Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays, from
8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.  All documents may be viewed in the OPP docket room or downloaded or viewed
via the Internet at the following site: http://www.regulations.gov.

The docket initially contained preliminary risk assessments, supporting documents, and technical (or
manufacturing-use) registrant error comments for aldicarb as of November 14, 2006. After a sixty-day
public comment period, EPA considered the public comments that were submitted to the docket and
revised the risk assessments as necessary. The revised risk assessments, any supporting documents that
needed to be revised, impact assessments, and memos describing the the Biological and Economic
Assessment Division (BEAD), Environmental Fate and Effects  Division (EFED), and Health Effects
Division (HED) response to public comments will be added to the docket on September 26, 2006.

The Agency documents in the docket include:

    1.  Federal Register Notice: Aldicarb Interim Reregi strati on Eligibility Decision;
       Notice of Availability.

   2.  Reader's Guide to the Aldicarb E-Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163.

   3.  Reregi strati on Eligibility Decision (RED) Document for Aldicarb.

   4.  BEAD Response to Comments Submitted to Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163.

   5.  Quantitative Impact Analysis for At-peg Application of Aldicarb to Peanuts (DP
       337549).

   6.  Significance of Aldicarb Use in the Production of Dry Beans, Soybeans, Pecans,
       Sweet Potatoes, Cotton and Citrus.

   7.  EFED Response to Public Comments for Aldicarb RED: Docket ID# Opp-2005-
       0163-0176.

   8.  Aldicarb - Ecological risk results for alternative application rate and incorporation
       efficiencies.

   9.  Use of Aldicarb for Lygus Bug Suppression, Aphids, and Mites on Alfalfa Grown
       for Seed Production.

    10. Use of Aldicarb for Leaf Minors on Coffee, forNematodes on Coffee and
       Sugarcane, and for Aphids and Flea Beatles on Tobacco.
                                   Page 75 of 191

-------
11. Review of "A Retrospective Ground Water Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and Its
   Metabolites in the Southeastern United States (MRID 467937-06); Mississippi
   Delta (MRID 467937-05); Texas (MRID 467937-04); California (MRID 467937-
   03); and Pacific Northwest (MRID 467937-02).

12. ADDENDUM to: Aldicarb - Ecological risk results for alternative application
   rate and incorporation efficiencies

13. Aldicarb (List A Case 0140, Chemical ID No. 098301).  HED Response to
   Comments Received During the Public Comment Period.

14. HED Revised Human Health Risk Assessment for the Reregi strati on Eligibility
   Decision Document (RED).
                             Page 76 of 191

-------
Appendix D. Citations Considered to be Part of the Database Supporting the
Reregistration Decision (Bibliography)

Guide to Appendix D

1. Contents of Bibliography. This bibliography contains citations of all studies
considered relevant by EPA in arriving at the positions and conclusions stated
elsewhere in the Reregistration Eligibility Document. Primary sources for studies
in this bibliography have been the body of data submitted to EPA and its
predecessor agencies in support of past regulatory decisions. Selections from
other sources including the published literature, in those instances where they
have been considered, are included.

2. Units of Entry. The unit of entry in this bibliography is called a "study." In the
case of published materials, this corresponds closely to an article. In the case of
unpublished materials submitted to the Agency, the Agency has sought to identify
documents at a level parallel to the published article from within the typically
larger volumes in which they were submitted. The resulting "studies" generally
have a distinct title (or at least a single subject), can stand alone for purposes of
review and can be described with a conventional bibliographic citation. The
Agency has also attempted to unite basic documents and commentaries upon
them, treating them as a single study.

3. Identification of Entry. The entries in this bibliography are sorted numerically by
Master Record Identifier, or "MRID" number. This number is unique to the
citation, and should be used whenever a specific reference is required. It is not
related to the six-digit "Accession Number" which has been used to identify
volumes of submitted studies (see paragraph 4(d)(4) below for further
explanation). In a few cases, entries added to the bibliography late in the review
may be preceded by a nine character temporary identifier. These entries are listed
after all MRID entries. This temporary identifying number is also to be used
whenever specific reference is needed.

4. Form of Entry. In addition to the Master Record Identifier (MRID), each entry
consists of a citation containing standard elements followed, in the case of
material submitted to EPA, by a description of the earliest known submission.
Bibliographic conventions used reflect the standard of the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI), expanded to provide for certain special needs.

a. Author. Whenever the author could confidently be identified, the Agency
has chosen to show a personal author. When no individual was identified,
the Agency has shown an identifiable laboratory or testing facility as the
author. When no author or laboratory could be identified, the Agency has
shown the first submitter as the author.

b. Document date. The date of the study is taken directly from the
document. When the date is followed by a question mark, the
bibliographer has deduced the date from the evidence contained in the
Page 77 of 191

-------
   document.  When the date appears as (1999), the Agency was unable to
   determine or estimate the date of the document.

c.  Title. In some cases, it has been necessary for the Agency bibliographers
   to create or enhance a document title.  Any such editorial insertions are
   contained between square brackets.

d.  Trailing parentheses. For studies submitted to the Agency in the past, the
   trailing parentheses include (in addition to any self-explanatory text) the
   following elements describing the earliest known submission:

       (1) Submission date. The date of the earliest known submission
          appears immediately following the word "received."

       (2) Administrative number. The next element immediately following
          the word "under" is the registration number, experimental use
          permit number, petition number, or other administrative number
          associated with the earliest known submission.

       (3) Submitter.  The third element is the submitter. When authorship is
          defaulted to the submitter, this element is omitted.

       (4) Volume Identification (Accession Numbers). The final element in
          the trailing parentheses identifies the EPA accession number of the
          volume in which the original submission of the study appears.   The
          six-digit accession number follows the symbol "CDL," which
          stands for "Company Data Library."  This accession number is  in
          turn followed by  an alphabetic suffix which shows the relative
          position of the study within the volume.
                       Page 78 of 191

-------
                                       Bibliography

6300        Hiddleson, L.; Bishop, J.P. (1966) Report No. 074566-045. (Unpublished study received Mar
            24, 1976 under 359-620; submitted by Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Monmouth Junction, N.J.;
            CDL:095197-I)

6606        Butts, R.F.; Simpson, G.W. (1969) Zolone EC-Potatoes: Final Report No. BB 69-60.
            (Unpublished study received Dec 7, 1972 under 3F1337; prepared in cooperation with Univ.
            of Maine, Entomology Dept, submitted by Rhodia, Inc., New Brunswick, N.J.; CDL:
            094849-AD)

6618        Wang, D.; Bacon, O.G. (1971) Zolone EC-Potatoes: Final Report No. FW 71-52.
            (Unpublished study received Dec 7, 1972 under 3F1337; prepared in cooperation with Univ.
            of California-Davis, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Rhodia, Inc., New Brunswick, N.J.;
            CDL:094849-AR)

6848        Stafford, E. (1966) Report No. PA 66-46. (Unpublished study received Jul 5, 1968 under
            8F0668; submitted by Chipman Chemical Co., Inc., Burlingame, Calif.; CDL:092027-BG)

6962        Pollet, O.K.; Aitken, J.B. (1977) Pest control for kernal pecans. Pecan South (Apr): 138-140.
            (Alsolnunpublished submission received Jun 9, 1977 under 359-620; submitted by Rhone-
            Poulenc, Inc., Monmouth Junction, N.J.; CDL:230375-T)

7727        Jenkins, L.E. (1974) Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of Insects on Dry Beans, 1974.
            (Unpublished study received Mar 31, 1975 under 201-347; prepared by Colorado State Univ.,
            Bay Farm Experiment Station, Dept. of Zoology-Entomology, submitted by Shell Chemical
            Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:223468-AK)

7741        Reynolds, H.T. (1971) Biological Effects of Lannate and Fundal/ Galecron Applied to Cotton
            for Residue Analysis. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by
            Univ. of California-Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station,
            Dept. of Entomology; submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232404-P)

7750        Pfrimmer, T.R. (1974) Results of Insecticide Tests with Materials Furnished by the Shell
            Chemical Company. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by
            U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Delta States Agricultural Research Center,
            Bioenvironmental Insect Control Laboratory, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington,
            D.C.; CDL:232404-AI)

7808        Reed, J.A. (1969) Potato Plots-1969. (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1972 under 352-
            342; prepared by Rutgers Univ., submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington,
            Del.; CDL: 003033-L)

7816        Watson, T.F.; Barnes, K.K.; Fullerton, D.G.; et al. (1970) Field and Laboratory Investigations
            on Cotton Insects in Arizona: 1970. (Summary report prepared for Cotton Insects Research
            and Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, Jan 12 and 13,  1971. Unpublished study received
            Apr 18, 1972 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station,
            submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003040-I)

7828        Evans, A.W.; Pate, T. (1966) Thrips Infestations, Average Plant Heights, Average Stand
            Counts, Rates of Technical Materials in Ounces, Type of Treatments and Insecticides Used in
            Thrips Test at Clarksdale, Mississippi during 1966: Table  1. (Unpublished study received Oct
            15, 1968 under 352-342; prepared in cooperation with Mississippi State Univ., submitted by
            E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003003-D)
                                       Page 79 of 191

-------
8096        Brodie, B.B. (1968) The Effects of Nematicidesic Treatments on Yield of Flue-Cured
            Tobacco, Tifton, Georgia 1968. (Unpublished study received Apr 22, 1969 under 352-342;
            prepared by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, submitted
            by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003007-F)

8129        Watson, T.F. (1972) Field and Laboratory Investigations on Cotton Insects in Arizona.
            (Summary report prepared for Cotton Insect Research and Control Conference, Phoenix,
            Arizona, Jan 9 and 10, 1973; unpublished study received May 24, 1976 under 352-342;
            submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:225098-K)

8256        Todd, J. (1970) Protection of Seedling Soybeans from Damage by Lesser Cornstalk Borer
            and/or Three-Cornered Alfalfa Hopper with Granular Insecticides. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 29,  1976 under 201-347; prepared by Georgia Experiment Station, submitted by
            Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232405-AL)

8298        Bacon, O.G.; McCalley, N. (1966) Control of the Potato Tuberworm. (Unpublished study
            received Jan 21,  1970 under OF0886; prepared by Univ. of California-Davis, submitted by
            E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-R)

8317        Reed, J.P. (1969) Potato Insect Control Test. (Unpublished study received Jan 21, 1970 under
            OF0886; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Entomology and Zoology, submitted by E.I. du
            Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-AH)

8606        Radcliffe, E.B. (1973) 1973 Potato Insecticide Trials, Rosemount, Minnesota. (Unpublished
            study received Sep 21, 1977 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of
            Entomology, Fisheries, and Wildlife, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.,
            Wilmington, Del.; CDL:231911-E)

8639        Bacon, O.G.; McCalley, N. (1966) Green Peach Aphid Populations Occurring on Potato
            Foliage in Plots Treated for Control of the Potato Tuberworm. (Unpublished study received
            Nov 16, 1971 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of California-Davis, submitted by E.I. du
            Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL: 00303 l-O)

8924        Polles, S.G. (1973) Results of Efficacy Studies Using Lannate and Various Insecticides on
            Pecan Trees. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 352-342; submitted by E.I. du
            Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:095289-H)

9073        Stier, E.F. (1969) Flavor Evaluation Report on Potatoes. (Unpublished study received Jan 21,
            1970  under OF0886; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science, submitted by E.I. du
            Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-H)

9103        Thurston, R. (1968) Effect of Granular and Foliar Insecticides on Leaf Damage by Tobacco
            Hornworms: Table 4. (Unpublished study received Feb 12, 1970 under 352-342; prepared by
            Univ. of Kentucky, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.;
            CDL:003013-E)

9247        Morishita, P. (1973) Thrips Control with Systemics. (Unpublished study received Aug 25,
            1976  under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of California-Riverside, Citrus Research Center and
            Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours
            & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:227322-M)

10163       Wells, J.C. (1970) Peanut Nematocide Test-1970. (Unpublished study including letter dated
            Oct 22, 1970 from J.C. Wells to Bill Wilner, received Oct 5, 1973 under 3G1359; prepared by
            North Carolina State Univ., Agricultural Extension Service, Dept. of Plant Pathology,
            submitted by PPG Industries, Inc., Chemical Div., Pittsburgh, Pa.; CDL:093629-I)
                                       Page 80 of 191

-------
11390       Schulz, J.T.; Kamali, K.; Ehart, R. (1971) Biology, Ecology and Control of Sunflower Insects.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 4, 1974 under 100-501; prepared by North Dakota State
            Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
            CDL:094016-G)

11418       Pollet, O.K. (1975) Pecan Demonstration Orchard Treatments, 1975. (Unpublished study
            including letter dated Dec 17, 1976 from O.K. Pollet and J.B. Aitken to Steve Dumford,
            received Dec 22, 1977 under 100-501; prepared by Clemson Univ., Cooperative Extension
            Service, Dept.  of Entomology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
            CDL:232600-G)

11419       Pollet, O.K. (1976) Control of pecan weevil shuckworm and aphid in South Carolina. Pecan
            South (Jun):408-411. (Alsolnunpublished submission received Dec 22, 1977 under 100-501;
            submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232600-H)

11873       Mistric, W.J. (1966) Report of R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Regarding Cigarette Smoke Tests
            Made on Samples of Cured Tobacco from Field Experiments in 1965: Table 2. (Unpublished
            study including letters dated Dec 3, 1965 from R. Wenger to Walter J. Mistric and Sep 20,
            1965 from to Thomas D. Lowman, received Dec 28,  1971 under 100-501; prepared by North
            Carolina State  Univ. in cooperation with R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., submitted by Ciba-
            Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:000539-L)

11893       Armbrust, E.J.; Cothran, W.R.; Wood, T.K.; et al. (1966) Early Spring Insecticide
            Applications for Alfalfa Weevil Control. (Unpublished study received Oct 22, 1972  under
            100-501; prepared by Cornell Univ., Dept. of Entomology and Limnology, Div. of Forage and
            Cereal Insect Investigations, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
            CDL:000536-G)

12428       Gerhardt, P.O. (1965) Insect Control Investigations on Potatoes: Project 418. (Unpublished
            study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; prepared by Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of
            Entomology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-D)

12435       Wells, A.; Wagner, D. (1967) Insecticide Evaluation on Potatoes-1967. (Unpublished study
            received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,  N.C.;
            CDL:093552-O)

12438       Radcliffe, E.B. (1965) 1965 Potato Data. (Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under
            3F1323; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Entomology, Fisheries,  and Wildlife,
            submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-R)

12440       Radcliffe, E.B. (1968) Control of Insect Pests of Potato with Various Rates and Formulations
            of Several Insecticides: Table 1. (Unpublished study  received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323;
            submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-T)

12444       Reed, J.P.;  Stier, E.F. (1965) Potato Insect Control Tests-1965. (Unpublished study received
            Nov 10, 1972 under  3F1323; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Entomology and Economic
            Zoology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-X)

12539       Bacon, O.G. (1965) Ecology, Biology and Control of Insects and Mites Affecting the Seed
            Production of Alflafasic, Clovers and Other Small Seeded Legumes in California: Project No.
            H1735. (Unpublished study received May 8, 1970 under OF0892; prepared by Univ. of
            California-Davis, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology,  submitted by Geigy
            Chemical Corp., Ardsley, N.Y.; CDL:091543-J)
                                       Page 81 of 191

-------
12561      Lawatsch, D.J.; Buchholz, C. (1968) Alfalfa Weevil Test. (Unpublished study including letter
           dated Jun 26, 1968 from D. J. Lawatsch to A. A. Di Edwardo, received May 8, 1970 under
           OF0892; submitted by Geigy Chemical Corp., Ardsley, N.Y.; CDL:091543-AQ)

12933      Heald, C.M.; Thames, W.H. (1969) Effect of Nematicides on Yield of Cotton Infected
           withRotylenchulus reniformis. (Unpublished study including letters dated Nov 17, 1969 from
           C.M. Heald to Clyde W. McBeth and Dec 2, 1969 from J.M. McBride to R.B. Boren, received
           Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops Research
           Div., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-E)

12948      Jorgenson, E.G. (1968) Yield of Treated Sugarbeets. (Unpublished study including letters
           dated Dec 6, 1968 from E.G. Jorgenson to Stanley T. Ichikawa and Jan 20, 1969 from J.L.
           Reed to Supervisor, New York Agricultural Chemicals Div., Pesticide Development Dept,
           Agronomics Herbicides, Nematocides and Fungicides, received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119;
           prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops Research Div., Crops  Research
           Laboratory, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-X)

12950      Ruppel, R.F.; Fogg, R.; Gomulinski, M.S.; et al. (1968) Sugar Beet Nematode, Granules,
           1968. (Unpublished study received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; submitted by  Shell Chemical
           Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-Z)

12959      Thomas, W.O.; Green, H.B. (1967) Insecticidal Control of Insects Attacking Southern Peas:
           Project No. SZ-10. (Unpublished study including letter dated Feb 10, 1969 from R. Boren to
           Supervisor, New York, Agricultural Chemicals Div., Pesticide Development, Agronomic
           Insecticides, received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by Mississippi State Univ., Truck
           Crops Branch Experiment Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
           CDL: 000777-AI)

12960      Thomas, W.O.; Green, H.B. (1967) Control of Soil Insects Attacking Sweet Potatoes: Project
           No. SZ-11. (Unpublished study received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by Mississippi
           State Univ., Truck Crops Branch Experiment Station,  submitted by Shell Chemical Co.,
           Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-AJ)

12978      Brodie, B.B. (1966) Evaluation of Potential Properitary sic Chemicals for Root-Knot Control
           of Tobacco~1966. (Unpublished study received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by U.S.
           Agricultural Research Service, Crops Research Div., Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment
           Station, Nematology Investigations, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
           CDL:000777-BC)

13020      Miller, P.M. (1963) Tobacco Cyst Nematode Control. (Unpublished study received on
           unknown date under 2139-76; prepared by Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station,
           submitted by Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc., Woodstock, 111.; CDL:025254-G)

13076      Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968) Meloidogyne incognitaGroup. (Unpublished study
           received Oct 6, 1969 under 464-379; submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.;
           CDL:003591-E)

13077      Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968) Rotylenchulus reniformis: Efficacy of Nematocides on
           Sweet Potatoes: #8714. Unpublished study. 27 p.

13079      Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968)Meloidogyne incognitaGroup and Streptomyces ipomoea.
           (Unpublished study received Oct 6, 1969 under 464-379;  submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A.,
           Midland, Mich.; CDL:003591-H)
                                       Page 82 of 191

-------
13090      Graham, T.W. (1968) 1968 Field Nematocide Tests for Control of Tobacco Nematodes.
           (Unpublished study including letter dated Sep 12, 1968 from T.W. Graham to Cooperators,
           received Oct 6, 1969 under 464-379; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service,
           Tobacco Breeding and Disease Investigations, submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland,
           Mich.; CDL:003590-T)

13794      Thompson, H.E. (1966) Elm Leaf Beetle Control in Kansas: 1961-1966. (Unpublished study
           including letter dated Feb 2,  1967 from H.E. Thompson to J.J. Mauget Co., received Nov 21,
           1967 under 7946-1; prepared by Kansas State Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by J.J.
           Mauget Co., Burbank, Calif.; CDL:008103-AC)

13797      Arnett, W.H. (1965) Elm Leaf Beetle Control with Systemic Chemicals: Report No. 18098.
           (Unpublished study received Nov 21, 1967 under 7946-1; prepared by Univ. of Nevada for
           Chemagro Corp., submitted by J.J. Mauget Co., Burbank, Calif; CDL: 008103-AM)

13962      Walton, R.R.; Burton, R.L. (1963) The Use of Systemic Insecticides for the Control of the
           Nantucket Pine Moth, Rhyacionia frustrana(Comst), on Pines in Oklahoma, 1962-63.
           (Unpublished study received Jun 26, 1967 under 201-229; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ.,
           Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Shell  Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000938-W)

13987      Brooks, R.F. (1968) Spiral Aphid: Test No.: RF 58. (Unpublished study including letter dated
           Nov 25, 1968 from R.F. Brooks to Jack T. Reinhardt, received Feb 3, 1977 under 201-274;
           prepared by Univ. of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Citrus Experiment
           Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:095827-H)

14394      Stier, E.F. (1965) Flavor Evaluation Report on Potatoes. (Unpublished study received Nov 10,
           1972 under 3F1323; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-CF)

14455      Brodie, B.B.; Dukes, P.O.  (1966) Field Performance of Selected Nematocides and Soil
           Fumigants: Line Project No.: CR f2-16. (Unpublished study received Oct 5,  1971 under 201-
           119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops Research Div., Georgia Coastal
           Plain Experiment Station, Nematology Investigations, submitted by Shell Chemical Co.,
           Washington, D.C.; CDL: 000777-BB)

14458      North Carolina State University, Research on Wheels (1965) Tobacco Summary Report of
           1965 Data. Raleigh, N.C.: NCSU. (Plant pathology information note no. 133;
           alsolnunpublished submission received Nov 11,  1966 under 464-240; submitted by Dow
           Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.; CDL:003480-A)

14927      Schaefer, R.; Koehler, C.; Kirby, M. (1975) Control of Greenhouse Whiteflies with Multiple
           Applications. (Unpublished study received Jul 12,  1977 under 239-EX-67; prepared in
           cooperation with Univ. of California-Berkeley, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Chevron
           Chemical Co., Richmond,  Calif.; CDL:233115-E)

14949      Sleesman, J.P. (1972) Vegetable Insect Control Experiments. Wooster: Ohio Agricultural
           Research and Development Center, Dept. of Entomology. (Ent.  misc. publication 73-1; report
           no. 36258; pp. 1-6,11-17 only; also In unpublished submission received Jul 24, 1973 under
           4F1424; submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Agricultural  Div., Kansas City, Mo.;
           CDL:094861-I)

15140      Cooledge, C.Y.; Murphy, D. W.; Mau, R.F.L. (1978) Orthene Use on Various Plants.
           (Unpublished study received Dec 21, 1978 under 239-2427; prepared in cooperation with
           Univ. of Hawaii, Agricultural Experiment Station,  submitted by Chevron Chemical Co.,
           Richmond, Calif.; CDL:236631-M)
                                      Page 83 of 191

-------
15141      Murphy, D.W.; Getting, R. (1977) Mealybug, Greenhouse Foliage Plants, Compressed Air
           Spray, One Application. (Unpublished study received Dec 21, 1978 under 239-2427; prepared
           in cooperation with Univ. of California-Riverside, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by
           Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL: 236631-N)

15285      Goyer, R. (1972) Orthene 75 S: Artificial Diet. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1975
           under 239-2443; prepared in cooperation with Cornell Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted
           by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:222345-D)

15973      Bass, M.H.; Guthrie, C.D.; Cobb, P.P.; et al. (1972) Annual Report for Period Jan. 1 to Dec.
           31, 1972: Biology and Control of Insect Pests of Soybeans and Peanuts: Ala-274, RRF Ala-
           295, S-74. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by Auburn
           Univ., Zoology-Entomology Dept., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
           CDL:232408-N)

16013      Sorensen, K.A. (1973) Fruit and Vegetable Insects. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976
           under 201-347; prepared by North Carolina State Univ., submitted by Shell Chemical Co.,
           Washington, D.C.; CDL:232410-V)

20129      Riverside Chemical Company (1967) Effect of Combinations of Herbicides and Systemic
           Insecticides on Cotton Planted April 24,  1967. (Unpublished study received Sep 26, 1968
           under 9779-93; CDL:227188-P)

20600      Arnold, E.; Wells, A. (1967) Report No.  C 67-42. (Unpublished study received Dec 8, 1967
           under 8F0668; submitted by Chipman Chemical Co., Inc., Burlingame, Calif; CDL:092961-
           H)

22444      Waddill, V. (1977) Evaluation of insecticides for control of insect pests of tomatoes, 1977.
           Insecticide  and Avaricide Tests 3: 109. (Alsolnunpublished submission received Mar 26,
           1979 under 352-342; submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.;
           CDL:237888-I)

25162      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company  (1979) Magnitude of the Residue.
           (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330; CDL:099219-A)

25163      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company  (1976) Nature of the Residue. (Unpublished
           study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330; CDL:099219-B)

25164      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company  (1975) Safety to the Consumer. (Unpublished
           study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330; CDL:099219-C)

25165      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company  (1978) Description of the Analytical Methods.
           Summary of studies 099219-E and 099219F. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under
           264-330; CDL:099219-D)

25166      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company  (1978) A Method for the Determination of
           Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Grapes. Method Aldicarb-FPD-General dated Aug 1978.
           (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-E)

25167      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company  (1977) A Confirmatory Procedure for the
           Identification of Aldicarb Residues by Gas Chromatography Utilizing a Non-polar Column.
           Method AldicarbFPD-Confirmatory dated Feb 1977. (Unpublished study received Jan 23,
           1980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-F)
                                      Page 84 of 191

-------
25168       Cox, J.A.; Jubb, G.L., Jr.; Taschenberg, E.F.; et al. (1978) Efficacy Data. (Unpublished study
            received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330; prepared in cooperation with Pennsylvania State Univ.,
            Vineyard Experiment Station and others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
            Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:099220-A)

25487       Allen, W.W.; Johnson, R.; Morishita, F.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy and Phytotoxicity.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 23,  1980 under MN 80/1; prepared in cooperation with Univ.
            of California-Berkeley, Dept. of Entomology and others, submitted by state of Minnesota for
            Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL: 241667-A)

25511       Back, R.C. (1979) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The Long Island Water Situation. (Unpublished
            study received Jan 30, 1980 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
            Va.; CDL: 241702-A)

28644       Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1980) Aldicarb Pesticide Mechanism of
            Action and Therapy:  Part II. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330;
            CDL:241639-A)

28645       Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Peroral Dose of Aldicarb on Cholinesterase
            Inhibition and Recovery in the Rat: Project Report 43-2. (Unpublished study received Jan 22,
            1980 under 264-330; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted by
            Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:241639-B)

28646       Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Peroral Dose of Aldicarb on Cholinesterase
            Inhibition and Recovery in the Rabbit: Project Report 43-3. (Unpublished study received Jan
            22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted
            by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa; CDL:241639-C)

28647       Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Oral Dose of Aldicarb on Cholinesterase Inhibition
            and Recovery in the Dog: Project Report 43-4. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980
            under 264330; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted by  Union
            Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:241639-D)

28648       Panasevich, R.E.; Matthews, R. J. (1980) The Effects of Aldicarb #2 DEQ-85  upon
            Endogenous and Exogenous Acetylcholine When Administered at Threshold Doses: Study
            No. PH-234-OC-001-79. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared
            by Pharmakon Laboratories, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler,
            Pa.; CDL:241639-E)

28811       Landis, B.J.; Jemmett, D.; Onsager,; et al. (1971) Efficacy Data for Control of Wireworms in
            Potatoes. (Unpublished study including test nos. SI-25-P-72, SI-26-P-72, SI-96-P-71...,
            received Nov 20,  1972 under 476-1995; prepared  in cooperation with U.S. Agricultural
            Research Service, Entomology Research Div. and others, submitted by Stauffer Chemical
            Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:003842-K)

28813       Sullivan, P.; Wright,  J.; Gold, L.; et al. (1972) Soil Insecticide Field Test Data: Test No. I-
            336-JW-72. (Unpublished study including test nos. I-334-JW-72,1-333-JW-72,1-332-JW-
            72..., received Nov 20, 1972 under 476-1995; prepared in cooperation with United States
            Sugar Corp. and others, submitted by Stauffer Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:003842-
            M)

29290       Union Carbide Corporation (1967) Performance Data Temik 10G~Cotton. (Unpublished
            study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-A)
                                       Page 85 of 191

-------
29291       Union Carbide Corporation (19) The Name, Chemical, Identity, and Composition of the
            Pesticide Chemical: Temik. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69;
            CDL:005587-B)

29292       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Determination of Technical Temik 2-Methyl-2-
            (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime and Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide
            by Infrared Analysis. Method 64C-21V5-K46 dated Oct 25, 1968. (Unpublished study
            received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-C)

29293       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the
            Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under
            1016-69; CDL:005587-D)

29294       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolism and Toxicity of Metabolites. (Unpublished
            study received Feb 6,  1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-E)

29295       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Toxicity of the Formulated Product Temik 10G Aldicarb
            Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-F)

29296       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolism in Plants. (Unpublished study received Feb 6,
            1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-G)

29297       Beckham, C.M.; Brooks, O.; Cowan, C.B.; et al. (1968) Introduction. (Unpublished study
            received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of Georgia and
            others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:005587-H)

29298       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Cotton Foliage and Systemic Activity. (Unpublished study
            received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-I)

29299       Clarkson, V.A.; Fronek, F.; Bariola, L.A. (1968) Residue Data for Temik in Soil.
            (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; prepared in cooperation with
            Grower Services, Inc. and U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:005587-J)

29300       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Description of Analytical Methods. (Unpublished study
            received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL: 005587-K)

29301       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Practical Methods for Removing Residues That Exceed Any
            Proposed Tolerance: Temik. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69;
            CDL:005587-L)

29302       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Reasonable  Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik.
            (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-M)

29323       Bass, M.H.; Johnson,  S.J.; Chiu, P. (1974) Biology and Control of Insect Pests of Soybeans
            and Peanuts: Report No. 43781. (Unpublished study including submitter summary, received
            Jul 1, 1975 under 3125-163; prepared by Auburn Univ., submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp.,
            Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:115279-D)

29943       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb Sulfoxide
            (ASO), Aldicarb Sulfone (ASO2) and a 1:1 Mixture of ASO:ASO2 Two Year Feeding in the
            Diet of Rats: Special Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1980 under 1016-69;
            prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:241658-A)
                                      Page 86 of 191

-------
29986       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-C)

29987       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik Aldicarb Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-D)

29988       Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Assay and Analysis for
            Impurities. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-E)

29989       Smith, F.F.; Maitlen, J.C.; McDonough, L.M.; et al. (1978) Report of Residue Analysis: PCY-
            68-11. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; prepared in cooperation
            with U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., Pesticide Chemicals
            Research Branch and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:097162-G)

29990       Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Description of Analytical Methods. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-H)

29991       Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in
            Tomatoes by Gas Chromatography. Method dated Aug 1977. (Unpublished study received
            Jun 30, 1978 under 101678; CDL:097162-I)

29993       Union Carbide Corporation (1978) Practical Method for Removing Toxic Aldicarb Pesticide
            Residues from Tomatoes.  (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78;
            CDL:097162-J)

29994       Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Aldicarb.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-K)

29995       Lyons, R.; Lindquist,; Sorensen,; et al. (1977) Residues from Aldicarb on Tomatoes.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; prepared by Michigan State Univ.
            and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;  CDL:097162-L)

29996       Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Confirmatory Procedure for the Identification of Aldicarb
            Residues Utilizing a Non-polar GLC Column. Method dated Feb 1977. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-M)

30423       Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J.  (1979) Oral LDI50A in Rabbits: Study No. CDC-UC-007-79.
            (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by CDC Research, Inc.,
            submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.;  CDL:242164-A)

30424       Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J.  (1979) Acute Dermal Toxicity in Rats: Study No. CDC-UC-008-
            79. (Unpublished study received Feb 28,  1980 under 264-330; prepared by CDC Research,
            Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 242164-B)

30425       Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J.  (1979) Acute Dermal Toxicity in Rabbits: Study No. CDC-UC-
            009-79. (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by CDC
            Research, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa; CDL:
            242164-C)

31311       Nigh, E.L., Jr.; Thomason, I.J.; Caveness, F.E.; et al. (1968) Quick Summary Reference of
            Performance of Temik 10G on Insects, Mites, Nematodes Attacking Cotton (Includes Data
            1964 thru 1967). (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared in
            cooperation with Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Plant Pathology and others, submitted by Union
            Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:091942-A)
                                       Page 87 of 191

-------
31547       Allen, W.W.; Johnson, R.; Morishita, F.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy and Phytotoxicity.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 11, 1980 under IL 80/1; prepared in cooperation with Univ.
            of California, Div. of Entomology, submitted by Illinois, Dept. of Agriculture, Plant & Apiary
            Protection for Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL:241606-A)

31565       Wilson, W.L.; Todd, F.A.; Leake, P.H. (1976) Sensory Evaluation of Cigarettes Made from
            Tobacco Treated with Standak 75% Wettable Powder Sulfocarb Pesticide (1974-1976).
            (Unpublished study received Feb 28,  1978 under 1016-79; prepared in cooperation with
            Imperial Tobacco, Ltd. and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:232983-B)

31763       Blackmon, C.W.; Farrar, L.L.; Smith, F.H.; et al. (1973) Addition to Synopsis of Biological
            Performance and Phytotoxicity on Cotton and Soybeans. (Unpublished study received Jan 3,
            1974 under 3125-213; prepared in cooperation with Clemson Univ.; Edisto Experiment
            Station and others, submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:094066-A)

32245       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-B)

32246       Sleesman, J.P.; Hofmaster, R.N.; Waterfield, R.L.; et al. (1978) Discussion of Performance of
            Temik: Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78;
            prepared in cooperation with Ohio State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station and others,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:097163-A)

32505       Allen, W.W.; Morishita, F.S.; Koranski, D.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy and Phytotoxicity.
            (Unpublished study received Apr 24,  1980 under DE 80/5; prepared in cooperation with Univ.
            of California-Berkeley, Div. of Entomology and others, submitted by Delaware, Dept. of
            Agriculture, Div. of Production and Promotion for Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.;
            CDL:242353-A)

35363       Union Carbide Corporation (1971) Ingestion of Aldicarb by Human Volunteers: A Controlled
            Study of the Effects of Aldicarb on Man. Includes undated methods entitled: Blood
            cholinesterase determination by a radiometric method; Aldicarb: The determination of
            residues in human urine. (Unpublished study including letter dated Feb 5, 1971 from C.U.
            Dernehl to R.C. Back, received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; CDL:091747-A)

35364       Union Carbide Corporation (1970) Response to Comments on Pesticide Petition OF1008:
            Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; CDL:091747-B)

35365       Bull, D.L.; Stokes, R.A.; Coppedge, J.R.;  et al. (1970) Further studies of the fate of Aldicarb
            in soil. Journal of Economic Entomology 63(4): 1283-1289. (Alsolnunpublished submission
            received Jul 26, 1971 under  1F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
            CDL:091747-C)

35366       Coppedge, J.R.; Ridgway, R.L.; Bull, D.L. (1968) A Preliminary Report on the Movement
            and Persistence of Aldicarb in Soil. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology
            Research Div., unpublished study; CDL:091747-D)

35367       Thomason, I.J. (1970) Efficacy  Study Using Sugar Beets. (Unpublished study including letter
            dated Dec 29, 1970 from I.J. Thomason to Robert G.  Haines,  received Jul 26, 1971 under
            1F1008; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California-Riverside, Citrus Research Center
            and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Nematology, submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-E)
                                       Page 88 of 191

-------
35368       Lange, W.H.; Phillips, I.L. (1971) Residue Study Using Sugar Beets. (Unpublished study
            including letter dated Dec 9, 1970 from W.H. Lange to Robert Haines, received Jul 26, 1971
            under 1F1008; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California-Davis, Agricultural
            Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington,
            D.C.; CDL:091747-F)

35369       Yun, Y.M.; Ellis, K.C. (1970) Residue Study Using Sugar Beets. (Unpublished study received
            Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared in cooperation with Great Western Sugar Co., submitted
            by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-H)

35370       Union Carbide Corporation (1970) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the
            Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under
            1F1008; CDL:091747-J)

35371       Weil, C.S.; Condra, N.I.; White, C. (1969) Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone Single Rabbit
            Skin Penetration Studies: Special Report 32-78. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971
            under 1F1008; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington,
            D.C.; CDL:091747-K)

35372       Carpenter,  C.P.; Adams, J.T. (1969) Miscellaneous Toxicity  Studies: Special Report 32-84.
            (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by  Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
            Mellon  Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 091747-L)

35373       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1970) Temik: Result of Feeding in the Diets of
            Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-5. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under
            1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-M)

35374       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) 1:1 Temik: Temik  Sulfone-Results
            of Feeding in the Diets of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 33-6. (Unpublished study received
            Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted
            by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-N)

35375       Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.A. (1970) Temik and Other Materials-Miscellaneous
            Single Dose Peroral and Parenteral LDI50A Assays and Some Joint Action Studies: Special
            Report 33-7. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-
            Mellon  Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide  Corp., Washington, D.C.;
            CDL:091747-O)

35376       Weil, C.S.  (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 33-18.  (Unpublished study
            received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-P)

35377       Woodside,  M.D.; Chin, B.H.; Tallant, M.J. (1969) Temik 10GV 2Methyl-2-
            (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methyl carbamoyl)oxime: Peroral Dosing of a Hereford
            Heifer with Notes on Cholinesterase Inhibition: Special Report 32-82. (Unpublished study
            received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-Q)

35378       Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.L. (1970) Comparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of
            Temik 10GV and 15 Other Pesticide Formulations as Marketed: Special Report 33-15.
            (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by  Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
            Mellon  Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-R)
                                       Page 89 of 191

-------
35379       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1969) 2-Methyl-2(methylsulfinyl)propanol-l:
            Results of Feeding in the Diets of Rats for One Week: Special Report 32-73. (Unpublished
            study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 091747-S)

35380       Schlinke, J.C. (1969) Toxicologic effects of five soil nematocides in cattle and sheep. Journal
            of the American Veterinary Medical Association 155(8):1364-1366. (Alsolnunpublished
            submission received Jul 26,  1971 under 1F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-T)

36307       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the
            Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689;
            CDL:096440-B)
36308       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: UCC No. l-21V5-1.8a.
            Includes methods UCC no. lB-21V5-l.ld dated Apr 21, 1975. (Unpublished study received
            Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-C)

36309       Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Assay and Analysis for
            Impurities. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-D)

36310       Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Nature of the Residues. (Unpublished study received Oct
            10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-E)

36311       McDonough, L.M.; Maitlen, J.C. (1967) Report of Residue Analysis: Report No. PCY-67-5.
            (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., Pesticide Chemicals
            Research Branch, unpublished study; CDL:096440-F)

36312       Iley, J.R.; Baines,; Gunther,; et al. (19) Magnitude of the Residue. (Unpublished study
            received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; prepared in cooperation with Applied Ag. Research,
            Inc. and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:096440-G)

36313       Gunther, F.A.; Carman, G.E.; Baines, R.C.; et al. (1975) Aldicarb (TemikA(R)I) Residues in
            Oranges, Orange Leaves, and Soil after Soil Application in an Orange Grove. (Unpublished
            study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California-
            -Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology
            and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 096440-H)

36314       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Description of Analytical Methods: Aldicarb.
            (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-I)

36315       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Citrus
            Fruit. Method Aldicarb-FPD-General dated Jul 1975. (Unpublished study received Oct 10,
            1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-J)

36316       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Aldicarb.
            (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-K)

41448       Union Carbide Corporation (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the
            Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78;
            CDL:097162-A)
41449       Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Nature and Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under  1016-78; CDL:097162-F)
                                       Page 90 of 191

-------
42482       Godek, E.G.; Matthews, R.J.; Naismith, R.W.; et al. (1980) Ames Salmonella/Microsome
            Plate Test: (Aldicarb): PH 301-UC-004-80. (Unpublished study received Sep 2, 1980 under
            264-330; prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
            Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243142-A)

44731       Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Chronic Toxicity Studies (Carinogenic and Oncogenic
            Effects). Summary of studies 096503-B through 096503-D and096503-G. (Unpublished
            study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; CDL:096503-A)

44732       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb: 18 Month Feeding in Diet
            of Mice: Special Report 35-70. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792,
            prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,  submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-B)

44733       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldicarb: 18-Month Feeding in the
            Diet of Mice, Study II: Special Report 37-98. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976
            under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 096503-C)

44734       Weil, C.S. (1976) Reanalysis of Tumor Incidence Data of Aldicarb 18-Month Mouse Feeding
            Studies: Special Report 39-55. (Unpublished study received May  19, 1976 under 6E1792;
            prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research, submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-D)

44735       Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Studies Using Aldicarb. Summary of studies 096503-F.
            Summary of studies 096503-F through 096503-1. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976
            under 6E1792; CDL:096503-E)

44736       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldicarb: Inclusion in the Diet of
            Rats for Three Generations and a Dominant Lethal Mutagenesis Test: Special Report 37-90.
            (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
            Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute  of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
            Va.; CDL:096503-F)

44737       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldicarb: Inclusion in the Diets of
            Dogs for Three Months: Special Report 37-12. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976
            under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, submitted
            by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-G)

44739       Moorefield, H.H.; Myers, R.C.; Weil, C.S. (1975)  Temik 10G BC (Coal); 10G and 15G
            (Gypsum); 15G (Corn Cob): Comparative Toxicity Studies via Peroral, Dermal, and
            Inhalation Routes: Special Report 38-141. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under
            6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-I)

44740       Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik.
            (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; CDL:096503-J)
51212       Bussian, R.A. (1980) Letter sent to H.H. Moorefield dated Oct 3,  1980: Temik TSX sample
            analysis. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; submitted by Union
            Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-E)

51314       Back, R.C. (1980) Letter sent to Charles T. Mitchell dated Mar 5, 1980 Temik 10% granular
            Aldicarb pesticide: Report on Welton Parker death. (Unpublished study received Mar 14,
            1980 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide  Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.;
            CDL:243366-A)
                                       Page 91 of 191

-------
51315       Back, R.C. (1980) Letter sent to Charles T. Mitchell dated Mar 5, 1980: Report on Paul Keller
            Case. (Unpublished study received Mar 14, 1980 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
            Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243367-A)

53127       Union Carbide Corporation (1980) Aldicarb Residue Analytical Data: Suffolk County EUP.
            (Reports by various sources; unpublished study received Oct 3, 1980 under 264-EX-58;
            CDL:243417-A)

53341       Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik (2-Methyl-2-
            methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-methylcarbamoyloxime) and Related Carbamates: Special
            Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
            Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-D)

53342       Striegal, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Special Report: Comparison of the Acute
            Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished
            study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;  prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-E)

53343       Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.A. (1970) Temik and Other Materials: Miscellaneous
            Single Dose Peroral and Parenteral LDI50 Assays and Some Joint Action Studies: Special
            Report 33-7. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
            Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;  CDL:228976-F)

53345       Johnson, H.E.; Sullivan, L.J.; McGee, M.A. (1968) Studies on an Effective Therapy for
            Overdoses of Temik, Temik sulfoxide, and Temik sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute,
            Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228976-H)

53346       Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Toxicity of Carbamate to Rats. Pages l-14,InPesticide
            Subdivision Agriculture & Food Chemistry Division,  156th ACS National Meeting; Sep 9-13,
            1968, Atlantic City, New Jersey. N.P. (Paper #121; Alsolnunpublished submission received
            Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228976-I)
53348       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) Temik (T), Temik Sulfoxide (TSO),
            Temik Sulfone (TSOI2), 1:1 TSO:TSOI2: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days:
            Special Report 33-81. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared
            by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-K)

53350       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb Sulfoxide
            (ASO), Aldicarb Sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1 Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in
            the Diet of Rats: Special Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-
            EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-M)

53353       Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity of Temik, Temik
            sulfoxide and Temik sulfone to Bluegill Sunfish: Project No. 111B32. (Unpublished study
            received Jan 18,  1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228975-C)

53355       Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Metabolism and Toxicity of Metabolites. Summary of
            studies 228975-J through 228975-N and 228976-D. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977
            under 1016EX-37; CDL:228975-H)
                                       Page 92 of 191

-------
53356       Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on the Probable Non-
            Carbamate Plant Metabolites of Temik (2-Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-
            methylcarbamoyloxime): Special Report 31-30. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977
            under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted
            by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228975-J)

53358       Bartley, W.J.; Andrawes, N.R.; Chancey, E.L.; et al. (1970) Metabolism of Temik Aldicarb
            pesticide (2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime) in the cotton
            plant. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemicals 18(3):446-453. (Also In unpublished
            submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228975-L)

53362       Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Nature of the Residue: Metabolism in Animals. Summary
            of studies 229879-K through 228979-O. (Unpublished study received  Jan 18, 1977 under
            1016-EX-37; CDL: 228979-B)

53363       Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Nature of the Residue: Environmental Fate of Sulfocarb.
            Summary of studies 228979-J and 228979-P through 228979-AA. (Unpublished study
            received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; CDL:228979-C)

53364       Bull, D.L. (1968) Metabolism of UC-21149 (2-Methyl-2-(methythio)propionaldehyde o -
            (methylcarbamoyl)oxime) in cotton plants and soil in the field. Journal of Economic
            Entomology 61(6):15981602. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under
            1016-Ex-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-D)

53366       Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A.; Bull, D.L.; et al. (1967) Fate of 2-Methyl-2-
            (methylthio)propionaldehyde o (Methylcarbamoyl) oxirne (Temik) in  cotton plants and soil.
            Journal of Agricultural andFood Chemistry 15(5):902-910. (Also in unpublished submission
            received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228979-F)

53368       Metcalf, R.L.; Fukuto, T.R., Collins, C.; et al. (1966) Metabolism of 2-Methyl-2-
            (methylthio)-propionaldehyde o -(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime in plant and insect. Journal of
            Agricultural and Food Chemistry 14(6):579-584. (Also in unpublished submission received
            Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228979-H)

53369       Ridgway, R.L.; Jones, S.L.; Coppedge, J.R.; et al. (1968) Systemic activity of 2-Methyl-2-
            (methylthio)propionaldehydeo(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (UC-21149) in the cotton plant with
            special reference to the boll weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology 61 (6): 1705-1712.
            (Alsolnunpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1015-EX-37; submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-I)

53370       Hirsh, D.H.; Sheets, K.P.; Holsing, G.C. (1976) Sulfocarb: Fate in Aerobic and Anaerobic
            Soils. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Arlington,  Va.; CDL:228979-J)

53371       Borough, H.W.; Me, G.W. (1968) Temik-S metabolism in a lactating cow. Journal of
            Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16(3):460-464. (Also in unpublished submission received
            Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228979-K)
                                       Page 93 of 191

-------
53372       Dorough, H.W.; Davis, R.B.; Me, G.W. (1970) Fate of Temik-Carbonl4 in lactating cows
            during a 14-day feeding period. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 18(1): 135-142.
            (Also in unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37: submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-L)

53373       Hicks, B.W.; Dorough, H.W.; Mehendale, H.M. (1972) Metabolism of Aldicarb pesticide in
            laying hens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 20(1): 151-156. (Alsolnunpublished
            submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-M)

53374       Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; Kozbelt, S.J.; et al. (1968) The Excretion of CA14I Equivalents of
            2-Methyl-2-(methylsulfonyl)propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime by the Rat after a
            Single Peroral Dose: Special Report 31-130. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under
            1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-N)

53375       Sullivan, L.J.; Eldridge, J.M.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1968) Urinary Metabolic Profiles as
            Determined by Silica Gel Chromatography of Urines from Rats and Dogs Dosed with Temik
            sulfone: Special Report 3 l-138a. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-
            37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-O)

53377       Andrawes, N.R.; Holsing, G.C. (1976) Hydrolysis of UC-21865  Sulfocarb Pesticide in
            Aqueous Buffer Solutions: Project No. 111A14. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977
            under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Q)

53378       Borash, A.J.; Kramer, J.A., Jr.; Moorefield,  H.H. (1973) Experiments Designed To Trace
            Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: Project No. 11 IB 13. (Unpublished study received Jan 18,
            1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-R)

53379       Bromilow, R.H. (1973) Breakdown and fate of Oximecarbamate nematicides in crops and
            soils. Annals of Applied Biology 75(3):473479. (Alsolnunpublished submission received Jan
            18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228979-S)

53380       Richey, F.A., Jr.; Bartley, W.J. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Water Leaching of Aldicarb,
            Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four
            Soil Types: Project No.  111A12. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-
            37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-U)

53381       Richey, F.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1972) Temik-Aldicarb Pesticide: Upward Movement of
            Aldicarb through soil during Water Evaporation: Project No.  111A12. (Unpublished study
            received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,  Va.;
            CDL:228979-V)

53382       Romine, R.R.; Meeker, R.L. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Leaching of Aldicarb into
            Sandy Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated Sugar Beet Field: Project No. 111A13.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-W)

53383       Romine, R.R.; Meeker, R.L. (1973) Accumulation of Aldicarb Residues in Fish Tissue from
            Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb sulfoxide and Aldicarb sulfone in Aquaria Water:
            Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted
            by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-X)
                                       Page 94 of 191

-------
53384       Copeland, G.L.; Fink, R. (1973) Final Report: Acute and Chronic Exposure of Bluegill
            Sunfishto Aldicarb Carbamate Residues: Project No. 400-612. (Unpublished study received
            Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Environmental Sciences Corp., submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Y)

53385       Romine, R.R.; Halstead, C.B.; Gibson, C.E.; et al. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Leaching
            Characteristics of Temik lOGin Soils: Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished study received Jan
            18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:228979-Z)

53386       Spurr, H.W., Jr.; Sousa, A. A. (1974) Potential interactions of Aldicarb and its metabolites on
            nontarget organisms in the environment. Journal of Environmental Quality 3(2): 130-133.
            (Also Inunpublished submission received jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37; submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228979-AA)

54410       Weil, C.S. (1977) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special Report 33-18.
            (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
            Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:231509-S)

54413       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) 1:1 Temik: Temik Sulfone: Results
            of Feeding in the Diets of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 33-6. (Unpublished study received
            Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical
            Hygiene Fellowship,  submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231509-V)

54442       Weil, C.S.; Condra, N.I.; Geary, D.L.; Jr.; et al. (1974) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide 10G and
            15G: Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Special Report 37-39. (Unpublished study received
            Aug 31, 1977 under 1016-69; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored
            Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:231462-A)

55533       Myers, R.C.; Carpenter, C.P.; Calisti, L.J.; et al. (1977) Temik/ Terrazole/Terraclor Mixture
            (2:1:4) Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Project Report 40-126. (Unpublished study received
            Oct23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research,
            Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
            Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 243546-D)

55534       Wolfe, G.W; Bristol, K.L. (1980) Final Report: Primary Eye Irritation Study in Rabbits:
            Project No. 400-634.  (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by
            Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
            Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-F)
                                       Page 95 of 191

-------
55535       Wolfe, G.W.; Wentz, K.L. (1980) Final Report: Primary Dermal Irritation Study in Rabbits:
            Project No. 400-633. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by
            Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
            Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-G)

55536       Wolfe, G.W.; Bristol, K.L. (1980) Final Report: Acute Oral Toxicity Study in Rats: Project
            No. 400-631. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton
            Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
            Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-H)

55537       Dauvin, E.M.; Wolfe, G.W.; Voelker, R.W.; et al. (1980) Final Report: Acute Dermal
            Toxicity Study in Rabbits: Project No. 400632. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980
            under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union
            Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 243546-1)

57332       Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik (2-Methyl-2-
            methylthiopropionaldehyde-M-methylcarbamoyloxime) and Related Carbamates: Special
            Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
            Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-D)

57333       Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Special Report: Comparison of the Acute
            Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished
            study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
            Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-E)

57335       Johnson, H.E.; Sullivan, L.J.; McGee, M.A. (1968) Studies on an Effective Therapy for
            Overdoses of Temik, Temik sulfoxide, and Temik sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
            Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228152-H)

57336       Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Toxicity of Temik on the Rat, Dog and Rabbit.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-I)

57337       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1968) Temik sulfone: Results of Feeding in
            the Diet of Rats for Six Months and Dogs for Three Months: Special Report 31-142.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon
            Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228152-J)

57338       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) Temik (T), Temik sulfoxide (TSO),
            Temik sulfone (TSOI2), 1:1  TSO:TSOI2: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days:
            Special Report 33-81. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared
            by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-K)

57339       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1974) UC 21865: Results of Feeding in the Diet
            of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 37-89. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under
            1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene
            Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide  Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-L)
                                       Page 96 of 191

-------
57340       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb sulfoxide
            (ASO), Aldicarb sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1 Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in
            the Diet of Rats: Special Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-
            EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-M)

57341       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Peterson, L.G.; et al. (1975) Aldicarb sulfoxide and Aldicarb
            sulfone Cholinesterase Inhibition Results after Periods of One to Fifty-Six Days of Inclusion
            in the Diets of Rats: Special Report 38-115. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under
            1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene
            Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-N)

58625       Carpenter, C.P.; West, J.S.; McGee, M.A.; et al. (1966) Single Dose Toxicity Studies on
            Tranid: Report 29-41. (Unpublished study received Jun 13, 1966 under 1016-EX-19; prepared
            by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126464-A)

58631       Weil, C.S.; Bernard, J.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Teratogenic
            Potential in Rats: Report 29-81. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24;
            prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide  Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:126491-A)

58632       Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G (10.5% Granular
            Formulation of Compound 21149) 15-Day Dermal Applications to Rabbits:  Report 29-80.
            (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126491-B)

58633       Stansbury, H.A., Jr. (1967) Letter sent to Frank J. McFarland dated Jul  10, 1967 Information
            on feeding of Temik-treated potatoes to livestock. Summary of study 126491-D.
            (Unpublished study received Jul 13, 1967 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-C)

58634       Dorough, H.W.; Me, G.W. (1967) Metabolism and Elimination of Temik-SA35I by a
            Lactating Cow. (Unpublished study received Jul  13,  1967 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by
            Texas A & M Univ., Dept. of Entomology,  submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
            Va.; CDL: 126491-D)

58635       Stansbury, H.A., Jr. (1967) Letter sent to Frank J. McFarland dated Jun 28, 1967
            Decomposition of Temik in potatoes.  (Unpublished study received Jul 3, 1967 under 1016-
            EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-E)

58636       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Formula for Temik  10G Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished
            study received on unknown date under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126491-F)

59356       Moorefield, H.H. (1979) Annotated Bibliography of N-Nitrosoaldicarb  (Chronological
            Sequence). Summary of studies 241324-B through 241324-H. (Unpublished study received
            Nov 14, 1979 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,  Va.; CDL:
            241324-A)

59357       Hirsh, D.H.; Sheets, K.P.; Holsing, G.C. (1978) Temik aldicarb Pesticide Stability of N-
            Nitrosoaldicarb: Project No. 810C21.  Method dated Apr 28, 1978. (Unpublished study
            received Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-69; submitted by  Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:241324-F)

60193       Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the
            Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. Summary of studies 093778-B through 093778-E.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under  3F1414; CDL: 093778-A)
                                       Page 97 of 191

-------
60194       Weil, C.S. (1972) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 35-41. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 25,  1973 under 3F1414; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
            Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.;
            CDL:093778-B)

60195       Weil, C.S.; DeMary, L.J.; Soo, V. (1971) Comparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik
            10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations as Marketed: Special Report 34-76.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ.,
            Mellon Institute,  Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Washington, D.C.; CDL: 093778-C)
60196       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1973) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb sulfoxide
            (ASO), Aldicarb  sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1 Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in
            the Diet of Rats:  Special Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under
            3F1414; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093778-D)

60197       Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Chin, B.H.; et al. (1973) Aldicarb: 2-Methylthio-2-
            methyrpropionaldehyde N-methylcarbamoyloxime: Seven-Day Inclusion in Diet of Dogs:
            Special Report 36-33. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by
            Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093778-E)

60554       West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) Special Report: The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of
            Compounds 20299, 21149,  19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels: Special Report
            28-30. (Unpublished study received Jun 1, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by
            Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:128692-F)

60555       Borash, A. J. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural Products. (Unpublished study
            received Jun 1, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:128692-G)

60556       Cope, O.B. (1964) Letter sent to Robert G. Harris dated Oct 30, 1964 Toxicity of various
            pesticides to rainbow trout and bluegill sunfish. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish-
            Pesticide Research Laboratory; unpublished study; CDL:128692-H)

61078       Mulla, M.S. (1964) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Oct 20, 1964 Information on toxicity of
            some compounds against mosquito fish. (Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1964 under
            unknown admin,  no.; prepared by Univ. of California-Riverside, Div. of Agricultural
            Sciences, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131936-A)

61079       Union Carbide Corporation (1969) Toxicity of the Formulated Product Temik 10G Aldicarb
            Pesticide. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin, no.;
            CDL:131936-C)
61080       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Effect on Wildlife. Summary of studies 131936-A,
            131936-B and 131936-H. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown
            admin, no.; CDL:131936-E)
61081       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolism and Toxicity of Metabolites. (Unpublished
            study received on unknown date under unknown admin, no.; CDL: 131936-F)

61082       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Acute Toxicity Studies. (Unpublished study  received on
            unknown date under unknown admin, no.; CDL: 131936-G)
                                       Page 98 of 191

-------
61087       Carpenter, C.P.; Goldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1966) Special Report: Recapitulation
            of Acute Toxicity and Pharmacodynamic Studies on Dessin (Compound 19786): Report 29-
            47. (Unpublished study received Sep 1, 1966 under 1016-EX-18; prepared by Mellon
            Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:126458-D)

61089       Borash, A.J.; Bryant, H.M., Jr. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural Products.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 10, 1965 under 1016-EX-18; submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126458-K)

62512       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Human Exposure Experience. (Unpublished study received
            Oct20, 1964 under unknown admin, no.; CDL:131936-D)

63184       Union Carbide Corporation (1968) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the
            Pesticide Chemicals.  (Unpublished study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234-
            A)

63185       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Manufacturing Process. (Unpublished study received Jun 14,
            1978 under 1016-81;  CDL:234234-B)

63186       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Specification: Temik TSX Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished
            study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234-C)

63187       Union Carbide Corporation (19) Specification Methods: Temik TSX Granular Pesticide.
            (Unpublished study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234-D)

64115       Natoff, I.L. (1976) The effects of antidotes in experimental animals intoxicated by carbomate
            and organophosphorus cholinesterase inhibitors. Pages 53-64,InMed. Prot. Chem.-Warf.
            Agents, Pap. Symp.. By  Stockholm, Sweden: Almquist & Wiksell. (Alsolnunpublished
            submission received Jul 20, 1980 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL: 234481-A)

64811       Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Application for
            Registration of Standak 75 WP Sulfocarb Pesticide for Use on Tobacco and Cotton. (Reports
            by various sources; unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; CDL:231504-G)

65956       Johnson, H.E.; McGee, M.A.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Studies on an Effective Therapy for
            Overdoses of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute,
            Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,  Va.;
            CDL:229032-H)

66341       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory (1981)
            Acephate, Aldicarb, Carbophenothion, DBF, EPN, Ethoprop, Methyl Parathion, and Phorate:
            Their Acute and Chronic Toxicity, Bioconcentration Potential, and Persistence as Related to
            Marine Environments: EPA-600/4-81-023. (Unpublished study)

66588       Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) (Some Biomedical Considerations of Temik, Temik
            Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone). (Unpublished paper #121 presented at the 156th ACS National
            Meeting, Agr. & Food Chemistry Div., Pesticide Subdivision; Sept 9-13, 1968, Atlantic City,
            N.J.; unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:229032-I)

66769       Peoples, S.A.; Maddy, K.T.; Smith, C.R. (1977) Occupational Exposure to Temik (Aldicarb)
            As Reported by Physicians in California for the Years 1974 through 1976. (California, Dept.
            of Food and Agriculture, Worker Health and Safety Unit; unpublished study; CDL:232634-A)
                                       Page 99 of 191

-------
66770       Natoff, I.L.; Reiff, B. (1973) Effect of oximes on the acute toxicity of anticholinesterase
            carbamates. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 25:569-575. (Also In unpublished
            submission received Dec 23, 1977 under unknown admin, no.; submitted by California, Dept.
            of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, Calif.; CDL:232634-B)

67477       Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Efficacy of Various Chemicals on Potatoes and Various
            Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study, including published data, received Nov 13, 1973
            under 3F1414; CDL:093780-A)

68243       Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Nature of the Residue. Summary of studies 231503-B
            through 231503-Z. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; CDL:231503-
            A)

68248       Borash, A.J.; Kramer, J.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1973) Experiments Designed to Trace
            Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: UCC Project Report No. 17959. (Unpublished study received
            Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:231503-P)

68249       Coppedge, J.R.; Ridgway, R.L.; Bull, D.L. (1968) A Preliminary Report on the Movement
            and Persistence of Aldicarb in Soil. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology
            Research Div., unpublished study; CDL:231503-R)

68250       Richey, F.A., Jr.; Bartley, W.J. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Water Leaching of Aldicarb,
            Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four
            Soil Types: UCC Project Report No. 16669. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under
            1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;  CDL:231503-S)

68251       Richey, F.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1972) Temik-Aldicarb Pesticide: Upward Movement of
            Aldicarb through Soil during Water Evaporation: UCC Project Report No.  17526.
            (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-T)

68252       Romine, R.R.; Meeker, R.L. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Leaching of Aldicarb into
            Sandy Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated Sugar Beet Field: UCC Project Report No.
            17079. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-U)

69644       Union Carbide Corporation (1981) Reassessment of the Acceptable Daily Intake Values for
            TemikA(R)I (Aldicarb) and Metabolites in the Human. (Unpublished study  received on
            unknown date under 264-330; CDL:244421-A)

69736       Dernehl, C.U. (1974) Letter sent to Richard C. Back dated Jan 21, 1974 Human consumption
            of potatoes containing 1 ppmof aldicarb. (Unpublished study received on unknown date
            under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:098300-A)

69738       Quick, Q.; Lovell, C.M. (1966) Temik Sulfoxide and Sulfone Stability: File No. 6135.
            (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:098300-C)

69739       Union Carbide Corporation (1973) A Method for the Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb
            Residues in Potato Tubers by Gas Chromatography. Method designation ALDICARB-FPD-
            POT dated Feb 1973. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL:
            098300-D)
                                      Page 100 of 191

-------
69740      Union Carbide Corporation (1973) A Method for the Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb
           Residues in Peanuts by Gas Chromatography. Method designation ALDICARB-FPD-PNUT
           dated Feb 1973. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-
           E)

69741      Union Carbide Corporation (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the
           Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414;
           CDL:098300-F)
69742      Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study
           received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-G)

69743      Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Assay and Analysis for
           Impurities: File No. 300-21V5. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414;
           CDL: 098300-H)

69744      Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: (Temik
           10G). (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL:098300-J)

69745      Weil, C.S., ed. (1972) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 35-41. (Unpublished
           study received on unknown date under 3F1414; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
           Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington,
           D.C.; CDL:098300-K)

69914      Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Introduction: Temik. Summary of studies 131905-B,
           131905-F and 131905-G. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin.
           no.;CDL:131905-A)

69915      Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1965) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jun 4, 1965 Toxicity information on
           compound 21149.  Summary of studies 131905-C through 131905-G. (Unpublished study
           received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-B)

69916      Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C.; et al. (1962) Range Finding Tests on Compound
           21149: Report 25-53. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin,  no.;
           prepared by Mellon Institute of Industrial Research,  Industrial Fellowship, submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-C)

69917      Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, I; et al. (1963) Results of Three Months of Inclusion
           of Compound 21149 in the Diet of Rats: Report 26-47. (Unpublished study received Sep 8,
           1965 under unknown admin, no.;  prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131905-D)

69918      Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, I; et al. (1964) Results of a Three Generation
           Reproduction Study on Rats Fed Compound UC21149 in Their Diet: Report 27-158.
           (Unpublished study received Sep  8, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by Mellon
           Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union  Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
           CDL:131905-E)

69919      Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.; McGee, M.A. (1965) A 4-hour Test for Evaluation of
           Comparative Skin Penetration Hazard: Report 28-34. (Unpublished study received Sep  8,
           1965 under unknown admin, no.;  prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131905-F)
                                      Page 101 of 191

-------
69920       Pozzani, U.C.; Kinkead, E.R. (1965) The Mechanical Attrition of Some Granular Pesticide
            Formulations: Report 28-35. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin.
            no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-G)

69921       Heywood, D.L. (1965) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jul 28, 1965 Data on metabolism of
            UC 21149 in animals and opinion on metabolic fate of UC 21149 in plants and animals.
            (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-H)

69922       Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Comparison of the Acute Toxicity of
            Compound 21149 with  Several of Its Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received
            Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131905-1)

70515       Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1980) Pesticide Residues in Food--
            1979: Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food
            and the Environment and the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide Residues Held in Geneva,  3-12
            December 1979. By FAO and World Health Organization. Rome, Italy: FAO. (Pages iii-
            iv,vi, 17-20 only; FAO plant production and protection paper 20; available from: Distribution
            and Sales Section, FAO, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00100, Italy; published study;
            CDL:244431-A)

70984       Sontag, J.M. (1978) Minutes: Thirteenth Meeting of the Data Evaluation/Risk Assessment
            Subgroup of the Clearinghouse on Environmental Carcinogens. (U.S. National Institutes of
            Health, National Cancer Institute, Div. of Cancer Cause and  Prevention; unpublished study;
            CDL:237727-D)

73205       Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1980) Acute Toxicity of Temik
            TSX  Granular Formulation. Summary of studies 243546-B through 243546-1. (Unpublished
            study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; CDL:243546-A)

73207       Ercegovich, C.D.; Rashid, K.A. (1977) Mutagenesis Induced in Mutant Strains ofSalmonella
            typhimuriumby Pesticides. (Unpublished study, including letter dated Sep 22, 1977 from C.D.
            Ercegovich to Tom Evrard, received Aug 24,  1979 under 1258-812; prepared by Pennsylvania
            State Univ., Pesticide Research Laboratory, submitted by Olin Corp., Stamford, Conn.;
            CDL:240890-C)

73306       Quarles, J.M.; Schenley, C.K.; Tennant, R.W. (1975) Use of a transplacental host-mediated
            culture system for assay of transformation by  Nitroso compounds. IRCS Medical Science
            (Supplement) 3(10):22. (Alsolnunpublished submission received Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-
            69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-B)

73307       Lijinsky, W.; Elespuru, R.K. (1975) Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity of N-Nitroso
            Derivatives of Carbamate Insecticides. (Unpublished study, including published data,
            received Nov 14,  1979 under 1016-69; prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Univ.
            of Tennessee, Oak Ridge Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 241324-C)

73308       Blevins, R.D.; Lijinsky, W., Regan, J.D. (1977) Nitrosated Methylcarbamate insecticides:
            Effect on the DNA of human cells. Mutation Research 44:1-7. (Alsolnunpublished
            submission received Nov 14,  1979 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-D)
                                      Page 102 of 191

-------
73309      Lijinsky, W.; Schmahl, D. (1978) Carcinogenicity of N-Nitroso derivatives of N-
           Methylcarbamate insecticides in rats. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2:413-419.
           (Alsolnunpublished submission received Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-69; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-H)

73345      Kimmerle, (1971) Letter sent to PF-ATEA Product Development dated Jan 25, 1971:
           Disyston and Temik granular: Report No. 29378. (Unpublished study received Dec 15, 1976
           under 3125-58; prepared by Bayer, W. Germany, submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp.,
           Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:095640-E)

75794      West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of Compounds 20299,
           21149, 19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels: Report 28-30. (Unpublished study
           received Aug 8, 1966 under 7G0529; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., South Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090633-G)

75801      Carpenter, C.P.; Goldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1966) Recapitulation of Acute
           Toxicity and Pharmacodynamic Studies on Dessin (Compound  19786): Report 29-47.
           Summary of studies 09063 3-C through 090633-1. (Unpublished study received Aug 8, 1966
           under 7G0529; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., South Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090633-S)

76065      Knott, W.; Beliles, R.P. (1966) UC-21149: Acute Toxicity in Sunfish. (Unpublished study
           received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-69; prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-A)

76066      Woodard Research Corporation (1965) UC-21149: Safety Evaluation on Fish and Wildlife:
           (Bobwhite Quail and Rainbow Trout). (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-
           69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-B)

76067      Beliles, R.P.;  Knott, W.; Wright, L. (1966) UC-21149  10%: Summary of Safety Evaluation
           on Fish and Wildlife.  Summary of studies 231174-A and 231174-B.  (Unpublished study
           received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-69; prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-D)

76100      Dernehl, C.U. (1966) Letter sent to J.S. Leary, Jr. dated Jul 12, 1966 Acute poisoning report
           by UC 21149. (Unpublished study received Jul 26,  1966 under unknown admin, no.;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 102773-A)

79137      Enfield, C.G.; Carsel, R.F.; Cohen, S.Z.; et al. (1980) Methods of Approximating Transport of
           Organic Pollutants to  Groundwater. (Unpublished study received Jun 24, 1981 under 100-607;
           prepared by U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Hazard
           Evaluation Div. and Computer Science Corp., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
           N.C.;CDL:245315-B)

79162      Wacker Chemie GmbH (1979) Toxicology Data for Butocarboxime and Drawin 4E:
           Summary. Summary of studies 245338-D through 245338AB. (Unpublished study received
           Jun25, 1981 under 35902-EX-l; CDL:245338-C)

79566      Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H., Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik and Related
           Carbamates: Special Report 3148. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-
           37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:229032-D)

79604      Wacker Chemie GmbH (1974) The Metabolism of Butocarboxime. (Unpublished study
           received 1975 under 35902-1; CDL:227600-A)
                                      Page 103 of 191

-------
79867      Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Evaluation of lexicological Data for Registration of
           Temik, Brand of Pesticide (UC-21149) Submitted with Letter of Octobers, 1966.
           (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:106627-A)

80223      Abdalla, N. A. (1981) Letter sent to J. Steve Lovell dated Jul 23, 1981: Grain sorghum
           fractionation studies. (Unpublished study received Jul 31, 1981 under 8F2107; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:070212-A)

80696      Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1966) Letter sent to H.A.  Stansbury, Jr. dated Dec 1, 1966 Summary of
           toxicity information on compound 21149. Summary of studies 090072-C through 090072-E,
           090072-G, 090072-H, 090072-N, 090072-Q, 090072-R and 090072-T. (Unpublished study
           received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-A)

80697      Andrawes, N.R.; Dorough, H.W.; Lindquist, D.A. (1966) Degradation and Elimination of
           Temik 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime in Rats.
           (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Texas A & M Univ.,
           Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-
           B)

80698      West, J.S.; Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.; et al. (1966) Temik (Compound 21149, Technical, 2-
           Methylthio-2-methylpropionaldehyde N-Methylcarbamoyloxime) Joint Action with Selected
           Organic Phosphate and Carbamate Pesticides: Report 29-98. (Unpublished study received
           Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial
           Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-A)

80699      Johnson, H.E.; McGee, M.A.; King, J.M. (1966) Temik (Technical Grade Compound 21149)
           Demyelination Potential in Chickens: Report 29-90. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967
           under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-D)

80700      Johnson, H.E. (1966) Temik (Technical Grade Compound 21149): Comparative Behavioral
           Effect in Rats: Report 29-89. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573;
           prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090072-E)

80701      Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C; et al. (1966) Temik  10G (10.5% Granular
           Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-day Dermal Applications to Rabbits: Report 298-80.
           (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
           Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
           W.Va.; CDL:090072-G)

80702      Sexton,  R. J. (1966) Toxicity of TemikA(R)I. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under
           7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-J)

80703      Ketcham,  N.H. (1966) Agricultural Chemicals: Analyses of Urine Specimens for Metabolite
           of UC21149: Project No. 299A20. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-K)

80704      Peele, R.E. (1966) Industrial Hygiene-Air Pollution Evaluation of Hazards Associated with
           the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No.
           66-IH-158-I-1. Includes methods dated Apr 26, 1966 and Jun 17, 1964. (Unpublished study
           received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.V.;
           CDL:090072-L)
                                      Page 104 of 191

-------
80705       Williams, F. (1966) Letter sent to J.T. Adams, R.C. Back, D.F. Braun, et al. dated Jun 2,
            1966: Human exposure study in the field application of Temik 10G on cotton. (Unpublished
            study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
            W.Va.; CDL:090072-M)

80706       Beliles, R.P.; Knott, W.; Wright, L. (1966) UC-21149: Safety Evaluation on Fish and
            Wildlife: (Bobwhite Quail and Rainbow Trout). (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967
            under 7F0573; prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-O)

80707       Knott, W.; Beliles, R.P. (1966) UC-21149: Acute Toxicity in Sunfish. (Unpublished study
            received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-P)

80708       West, J.S.; Condra, N.I. (1966) Miscellaneous Acute Toxicity Data, Olefins Division: Report
            28-140. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-
            Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-S)

80709       Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al.  (1965) Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat:
            Report 28-138. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by
            CarnegieMellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
            Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-T)

80710       Carpenter, C.P.; Goldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1965) Recapitulation of
            Pharmacodynamic and Acute Toxicity Studies  on Temik (Compound 21149): Report 28-78.
            (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,
            Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston,
            W.Va.; CDL:090072-V)

80808       Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Introduction: Temik: Toxicity. Summary of study 090525-
            B. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090525-A)

80809       Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 25, 1966 Summary of toxicity
            reports on compound 21149. Summary of studies 090525-C through 090525-G, 090525-J
            through 090525-N and 090527-J. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473;
            prepared by  Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.;
            CDL:090525-B)

80810       Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C.; et al. (1963) Range Finding Tests on Compound
            21149 (2-Methylthio-2-methylpropionaldehyde N-Methylcarbamoyloxime): Report 25-53.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute of
            Industrial Research, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York,
            N.Y.; CDL:090525-C)

80811       Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.; McGee, M.A. (1965) A 4-hour Test for Evaluation of
            Comparative Skin Penetration Hazard: Report 28-34. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,
            1965 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-F)

80812       West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of Compounds 20299,
            21149, 19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels: Report 28-30. (Unpublished study
            received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473;  prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship,
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL: 090525-J)
                                      Page 105 of 191

-------
80813       Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965) Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat:
            Report 28-138. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon
            Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.;
            CDL:090525-L)

80814       Carpenter, C.P. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 25, 1966: 2 year feeding of UC
            21149 (409-RD-89 reference 14LK90) to dogs. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966
            under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-N)

80815       Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Residue Data: UC 21149. (Compilation; unpublished
            study received Jan 25,  1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090525-O)

80816       Romine, R.R. (19) The Determination of Residues of 2-Methyl-2(methylthio)
            Propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl) Oxime, Systemic Insecticide UC 21149, in
            Agricultural Crops. Undated method. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,  1966 under
            6G0473; submitted by  Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-P)

80817       Crowder, R.A.; Johnson, H.E.; Romine, R.R. (1965) Letter sent to J.T. Adams; D.L.
            Heywood; R.C. Back; et al. dated Jul 14, 1965: The response of Temik metabolites and
            related materials to the method of analysis employed for Temik systemic insecticide.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-Q)

80818       Stansbury, H.A.;  Johnson, D.P. (1964) Agricultural Chemicals, Residue Analysis: Stability of
            3-Chloro-5(or 6)-endo-cyanobicyclo(2.2.1)heptan-2-one N-Methylcarbamoyloxime (20047)
            and 2Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde N-Methylcarbamoyloxime (21149) in Animal
            Diets: Project No. 143B15. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473;
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:09525-R)

80819       Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Metabolism of 21149 in Cotton and Potatoes.
            (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090525-S)

80820       Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A. (19) Preliminary Studies on the Fate of Radiolabeled Union
            Carbide 21149 in Soil and Cotton Plants. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology
            ResearchDiv.; unpublished study; CDL:09525-T)

80821       Romine,R.R. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 11, 1966 Interpretation of analytical
            results obtained by Temik residue method for agricultural crops. (Unpublished study received
            Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.;
            CDL:090525-U)

80822       U.S. Public Health Service (1966) Report of Illness Associated with Use of the Experimental
            Insecticide, Temik. (Communicable Disease Center, Western Pesticides Research Laboratory;
            unpublished study; CDL:090527-B)

80823       Herrett, R.A.; Borash, A.J. (1967) Temik Insecticide: Root Uptake, Distribution, and
            Disappearance of Temik in Spearmint and Bean: Project No. 11 IB 16. (Unpublished study,
            including letters dated Feb 7, 1967 from R.A. Herrett to H.A. Stansbury and May 20, 1967
            fromH.A. Stansbury, Jr. to Harry W. Hays, received Mar 11, 1968 under 6G0473; submitted
            by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090527-C)

80824       Durham, W.F. (1967) Letter sent to Chief, Office of Pesticides dated Jan 7, 1967: Quarterly
            memorandum of research progress, Western Pesticides Research Laboratory, for period
            October-December, 1966. (U.S. Public Health Service, Communicable Disease Center, Office
            of Pesticides, Western Pesticides Research Laboratory; unpublished study; CDL:090527-D)
                                      Page 106 of 191

-------
80825       Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G (10.5% Granular
            Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-day Dermal Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80.
            (Unpublished study received Mar 11, 1968 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute,
            Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp, New York, N.Y.; CDL:090527-I)

81182       Interregional Research Project Number 4(1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the
            Petition: (Temik). (Unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 under 7E1996; CDL:097784-A)

81413       Weil, C.S.; Mazzoni, M.; Condra, N.I.; et al. (1966) Results of Long-term Tests for Mouse
            Skin Carcinogenicity of Three Process Residues, One Epoxide and Three Compounds: Report
            29-34. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon
            Institute, Industrial Fellowship,  submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:126498-A)

81414       Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965) Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat:
            Report 28-138. (Unpublished study received Jan 14,  1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by
            Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
            CDL:126498-B)

81415       Pozzani, U.C.; Haun, C.C.; Kinkead, E. (1963) A Basis for Projecting the Probable Inhalation
            Hazards of UC 21149 to Humans under Field Use Conditions: Report 26-38. (Unpublished
            study received Jan 14,  1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial
            Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126498-C)

81550       Great Lakes Chemical  Corporation (1978) Ethylene Dibromide and Its Pesticidal Aternatives-
            -Toxicity, Persistence,  and Plant Residues. (Unpublished study received Jan 26,  1979 under
            5785-18; CDL:097779-Q)

81880       Stansbury, H.A.; Johnson, D.P.  (1964) Stability of... (20047) and ... (21149) in Animal Diets:
            File No. 2323. (Unpublished study received Jun 6, 1966 under 5G0452; submitted by Union
            Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090493-X)

81883       Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Toxicity to Fish and Wildlife. (Compilation; unpublished
            study received May  10, 1965 under 5G0452; CDL:090494-B)

85455       Herrett, R.A.; Bagley, W.P. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Metabolism and Distrubution in
            Potato: 855-31107-8020. (Unpublished study  received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted
            by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-F)

85456       Weil, C.S.; Bernard, J.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Teratogenic
            Potential in Rats: Report 29-81. (Unpublished study received Mar 2,  1967 under 7F0573;
            prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:  090072-H)

85457       Bartley, W.J.; Heywood, D.L. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Radiosynthesis of 2-Methyl-2-
            (methylthio) propionaldehyde o-(MethylCA14I-carbamoyl)oxime and Its Corresponding
            Sulfoxide: 85531106-8048. (Unpublished study  received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573;
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-I)

85458       Weil, C.S.; Woodside,  M.D.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1966) Two-year Feeding of Compound 21149
            in the Diet of Dogs: Report 29-5. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573;
            prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by
            Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-Q)
                                      Page 107 of 191

-------
85460      Weil, C.S.; King, J.M.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1965) Two-year Feeding of Compound 21149
           in the Diet of Rats: Report 28-123. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473;
           prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New
           York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-K)

85461      Pozzani, U.C.; McGee, M.A.; Kinkead, E.R.; et al. (1966) Response of Rats Living for 28
           Days on Topsoil Treated with UC21149 10G1: Report 29-2. (Unpublished study received Jan
           25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-M)

86606      Andrawes, N.A. (1981) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including
           a Description of the Analytical Method Used: Temik. (Unpublished study received Nov 2,
           1981 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler,
           Pa.; CDL:070447-A)

86607      Myers, W.R.; Harrison, S.L. (1981) Residues: TemikA(R)I/Grapes: Project No. 813C50.
           (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
           Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:070447-B)

86608      Union Carbide Corporation (1978) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Grapes
           by Gas Chromatography. Method Aldicarb-FPD-general dated Aug 1978. (Unpublished study
           received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; CDL:070447-C)

86609      Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Confirmatory Procedure for the Identification of Aldicarb
           Residues Utilizing a Non-polar GLC Column. Method Aldiccarb-FPD-confirmatory dated
           Feb 1977.  (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; CDL: 070447-D)

86610      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1981) Reasonable Grounds in
           Support of the Petition: Temik.  (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330;
           CDL: 070446-A)

90570      Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Temik(TM) 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide:
           (Active Ingredient~UC 21149): F-40977C. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under
           1016-EX-30; CDL:131932-A)

90572      Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Available Toxicity Data. (Unpublished study received Sep
           8, 1965 under unknown admin,  no.; CDL:131945-A)

90573      Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Results of Tests Conducted by and under the Supervision
           of Federal and State Agencies with UC 21149 Formulations on Ornamental Plant Pest
           Control-1962-1964. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown
           admin, no.; CDL:131945-B)

91233      Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Summary of Selected Performance of UC 21149 on
           Various Pests on Cotton and Potatoes 1964-1965. (Compilation; unpublished study received
           Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090526-C)

91234      Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Summary and Discussion: Temik. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090526-D)

91235      Stansbury, H.A.; Wright, M.P. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Standard Samples for Residue
           Analyses:  855-31106-7965. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473;
           submitted  by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-F)
                                      Page 108 of 191

-------
91236      Williams, F. (1966) Letter sent to J.T. Adams, N.H. Ketcham, R.C. Back and others dated Jun
           2, 1966: Human exposure study in the field application of Temik 10G on cotton.
           (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-J)

91237      Union Carbide Corporation (19) Cholinesterase. Undated method. (Unpublished study
           received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL: 090526-K)

91238      Peele, R.E. (1966) Industrial Hygiene-Air Pollution Evaluation of Hazards Associated with
           the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No.
           66-IH-158-I-1. Includes method 38C-21V5-R2.1 dated Apr 26, 1966 and method 38C-22M2-
           22 dated Jun 17, 1966. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-L)

91239      Ketcham, N.H. (1966) Agricultural Chemicals: Analyses of Urine Specimens for Metabolite
           of UC21149: File No. 5882. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-M)

91240      Sexton, R.J. (1966) Toxicity of TemikA(R)I. (Unpublished study, including letter dated Jul 11,
           1966  from R.J. Sexton to L.B. Weddell, received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-N)

91241      West, J.S.; Condra, N.I.  (1966) Miscellaneous Acute Toxicity Data: Report 28-140.
           (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute,
           Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-R)

91242      Dernehl, C.U. (1966) Letter sent to J.S. Leary, Jr. dated Jul 12, 1966 Human poisoning by UC
           21149, Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-W)

91958      Ridgway, R.L.; Cowan,  C.B. (1966) A Report on Laboratory and Field Studies on the Effect
           of Several Insecticides on Beneficial Arthropods in 1966: Mobay 20268. (U.S. Agricultural
           Research Service, Entomology Research Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals
           Investigations and Southwestern Cotton Insects Investigations; unpublished study;
           CDL: 120463-D)

92405      Borash, A. J. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide  Agricultural Products. (Unpublished study
           received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, Va.; CDL:131946-A)

92605      Abdellatif, M.A.; Hermanson, H.P.; Reynolds, H.T. (1967) Effect of soil clay and organic
           matter content upon systemic efficacy of two carbamate insecticides. Journal of Economic
           Entomology 60 (5): 1445-1450. (Also In unpublished submission received Sep 25, 1968 under
           8F0711; submitted by FMC Corp., Middleport, N.Y.; CDL:091231-C)

92769      Lin, S.C.; Funke, B.R.; Schulz, J.T. (1972) Effects  of some organophosphate and carbamate
           insecticides on nitrification and legume growth. Plant and Soil 37:489-496.  (Also in
           unpublished submission received Mar 30, 1977 under 279-2712; submitted by FMC Corp.,
           Philadelphia, Pa.; CDL:229241-E)

93021      Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide (Active
           Ingredient~UC 21149).  New York, N.Y.: Union Carbide. (F-40977C, Mar 1966; also in
           unpublished submission received Oct 20,  1967 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:131932-A)
                                      Page 109 of 191

-------
93628      Union Carbide (1967) Summary: Toxicological Studies on Temik. Summary of study
           090714-C. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637; CDL:090714-A)

93629      Union Carbide (1967) Summary and Discussion: Temik Residue Studies. Includes methods
           dated Aug 18, 1967. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under
           8F0637; CDL: 090714-D)

93630      Union Carbide (1966) Summary of Data on Metabolism of Temik in the Cotton Plant.
           Summary of study 090714-G. (Unpublished study received Dec 29, 1966 under 8F0637;
           CDL:090714-F)

93631      Union Carbide (1967) Performance Data: Temik 10G~Cotton. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received on unknown date under 8F0637; CDL:090714-H)

93632      Haines, R.G. (1967) TemikA(TM)110G Experimental Systemic Pesticide: F-40977D.
           (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637; submitted by Union Carbide,
           South Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090714-I)

93640      Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A.; Bull, D.L.; et al. (1966) A Report on 2-Methyl-2-
           (methylthio)propionaldehydeO(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik) in Cotton Plants and Soil.
           (Unpublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Texas A & M Univ.,
           Agricultural Experiment Station, Entomology Research Div., submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-B)

93641      Borash, A.J. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Relative Soil Persistence of Sulfide, Sulfoxide, and
           Sulfone: Status Report 855-311078157. (Unpublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under
           7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090741-C)

93642      Coppedge, J.R. (1967) Fate of 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehydeO-
           (methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik) in Plants and Soil. Master's thesis, Texas A & M Univ.
           (Unpublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-D)

93643      Stansbury, H.A.; Wright, M.P. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Standard Samples for Residue
           Analyses: Status Report 855-31106-7965. (Unpublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under
           7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-E)

93644      Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Summary and Discussion of Results of Tests with Temik
           10G on Potatoes 1965-1966. (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under
           7F0573; CDL: 090741-F)

93645      Bull, D.L.; Lindquist, D. A.; Coppedge, J.R. (1966) A Report on Metabolism of 2-Methyl-2-
           (methylthio)propionaldehydeO-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik) in Insects. (U.S.
           Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., Cotton Insects Systemic
           Chemicals Investigations; unpublished study; CDL:090741-G)

93913      Westlake, G.E.; Bunyan, P.J.; Martin, A.D.; et al. (1981) Carbamate poisoning: Effects of
           selected carbamate pesticides on plasma enzymes and brain esterases of Japanese quail
           (Coturnix cotornix japonica). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 29(4):779-784.
           (Alsolnunpublished submission received Jan 26, 1982 under 239-2471; submitted by Chevron
           Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:246657-J)

94799      Me, D.A. (1981) Letter sent to Donald Stubbs dated Oct 28,  1981 Concerning  the use of
           Aldicarb to control citrus nematodes in grapefruit orchards. (Texas, Dept. of Agriculture,
           Agricultural & Environmental Sciences Div., unpublished study, including undated letter
           fromE.L. Johnson to David A. Me; CDL: 246256-A)
                                      Page 110 of 191

-------
95927       Borough, H. W. (1970) Metabolism of insecticidal methylcarbamates in animals. Journal of
            Agricultural and Food Chemistry 18(6): 1015-1022. (Alsolnunpublished submission received
            Jan 18, 1971 under 9F0843; submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.;
            CDL:093138-AC)

96543       Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1982) Monitoring Aldicarb
            Residues in Soil and Water, 1981. (Compilation; unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982
            under 264-330; CDL:246960-A)

96544       Hansen, J.L.; Hendrix, C.D. (1982) Comments on Intera and Cornell Aldicarb Transport
            Simulation for Eastern Long Island: File No. 29840. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
            1982 under 264330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler,
            Pa.; CDL:246960-B)

96545       Andrawes, N.R. (1982) Response to EPA's Conclusions Relative to Aldicarb Environmental
            Fate: Project No. 813C51. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330;
            submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-C)

96546       Andrawes, N.R.; Heintzelman, R.W. (1982) Plant Uptake of TemikA(R)I Aldicarb Pesticide
            from Soil: File No. 29920. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330;
            submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-D)

96547       Spiegel, M.H.; Conway, R. A. (1982) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and
            Aldicarb Sulfone: Project III. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330;
            submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-E)

96548       Hansen, J.L. (1982) Letter sent to R.C. Back dated Feb 19,  1982: Hydrolysis interpolations:
            Project Ilia. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union
            Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-F)

96549       Technicon Industrial Systems (1981) Preliminary Method for the Determination of Aldicarb
            and Its Oxidative Methabolities (sic) in Potable Water as Total Aldicarb Sulfone Equivalence.
            (Unpublished study, including letters dated Nov 16, 1981 from T.M. Martin to K.A. Mede
            and Nov 18, 1981 from J.C. Daly to T.M. Martin, received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330;
            submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-G)

96550       Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1982) A Rating System for
            Predicting the Appearance of Aldicarb Residues in Potable  Water. (Unpublished study
            received Mar 9, 1981 under 264-330; CDL:246960-J)

96557       Myers, W.R.; Harrison, S.L. (1982) Residues: TemikA(R)I/Tomatoes: File No. 29948.
            Includes method dated Aug 1977. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,  1982 under 8F2096;
            submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:070711-A)

98468       Stauffer Chemical Company (1980) Comparison of Acute Oral Avian Toxicology between
            DyfonateA(R)I 20-G Insecticide and Other Corn Granular Insecticides.  (Unpublished study
            received Oct 24, 1980 under 476-2028; CDL:243582-A)

100230      Clarkson, V.A.; Haines, R.G.; Hennsley, W.H.; et al. (1969) Report on Additional Field Tests
            with Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on the Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished
            study received Oct 27, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
            Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-B)
                                      Page 111 of 191

-------
100231     Lund, R.C.; Haines, R.G. (1969) Field Evaluation of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Potential
           Hazard to White-tail Deer and Cottontail Rabbits from Simulated Spills. (Unpublished study
           received Oct 27, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; prepared in cooperation with New Jersey, Fish and
           Game Commission, Black River State Game Field Station, submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-C)

100232     Back, R.C.  (1969) Letter sent to Harold G. Alford dated Aug 22, 1969: Temik 10G aldicarb
           pesticide-First periodic report. (Unpublished study received Aug 25, 1969 under 1016-EX-
           30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-D)

100296     Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity of Temik, Temik
           Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone to Bluegill Sunfish: File No. 10493. (Unpublished study
           received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
           CDL:096727-B)

100381     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Feeding in the Diet of Rats for Three or Six Months: Report 31-
           142. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under  1016-79; CDL:096728-A)

100382     Striegel, J.; Condra, N.; Haun, C. (1963) Acute Toxicity of Compound (21865): Special
           Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,  1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon
           Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096728-B)

100383     Weil, C.; Condra, N.; White, C.  (1969) Temik Sulfone: Single Rabbit Skin Penetration
           Studies: Special Report 32-78. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
           prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-C)

100384     Nycum, J.;  Kinkead, E.; Lauffer, J.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik (Sulfone):
           Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by
           Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-D)

100385     Weil, C.; Condra, N.; Geary, D.; et al. (1973) UC 21865; Technical... Range Finding Toxicity
           Studies: Special Report 36-26. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
           prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene
           Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-E)

100386     Weil, C. (1974) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: UC 21865: Special Report 37-10.
           (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by  Carnegie-Mellon
           Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-F)

100387     Babish, J.; Salerno, A. (1977) Neurotoxicity Evaluation  of UC 21865 in White Leghorn Hens
           (Gallus domesticus): Laboratory No. 5233. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under
           1016-79; prepared by Food and Drug Research Laboratories, Inc., submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-M)

100388     Woodside, M.; Weil, C.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1977) Aldicarb Sulfone:  18-month Feeding in the
           Diet of Mice: Project Report 4038. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
           prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;  CDL:096728-O)
                                      Page 112 of 191

-------
100389     Weil, C. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special Report 33-18. (Unpublished
           study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
           Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096728-T)

100390     Weil, C.; McGee, M.; Baughman, J. (1970) Sulfocarb: Miscellaneous Single Dose Peroral and
           Parenteral LD50 Assays and Some Joint Action Studies: Special Report 33-7. (Unpublished
           study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
           Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096728-U)

100391     Weil, C. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special Report 33-92. (Unpublished
           study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
           Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096728-V)

100392     Weil, C.; Condra, N.; Geary, D.; et al. (1973) UC 21865 Formulation 22RZB-75-B; 50W:
           Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Special Report 36-24.  (Unpublished study received Jan 25,
           1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research,
           Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096728-X)

100393     Weil, C.; Burton, D.; Calisti, L. (1974) UC 21865 Technical, UC 21865-75% WP, Peroral
           Intubation of Rats with or without Subsequent Dose(s) of Atropine: Special Report 37-60.
           (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by CarnegieMellonUniv.,
           Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AA)

100394     Nycum, J.; Kinkead, E.; Lauffer, J.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on the Probable Non-
           carbamate Plant Metabolites of Temik: Special Report 31-30. (Unpublished study received
           Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AB)

100398     Frazier, H. (1977) Sulfocarb Formulation Study. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978
           under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AH)

100401     Stier, E. (1971) Summary on Sensory Evaluation of Potato Samples: Temik. (Unpublished
           study received Jan 25, 1978 under 101679; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-C)

100402     Stier, E. (1972) Sensory Evaluation Report on Peanuts.  (Unpublished study received Jan 25,
           1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Rutgers Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-D)

100403     Holland, R. (1976) Letter sent to A. Dawson dated Oct  5, 1976: Taste test: Effect of
           experimental pesticide on Valencia orange flavor. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978
           under 101679; prepared by Sunkist Growers, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-E)

100404     Foremost Foods Co. (1977) Difference Testing: Kidney Beans: Control Versus Temik
           Treated. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-F)
                                      Page 113 of 191

-------
100405     Foremost Research Center (1977) Difference Testing: Fresh Tomatoes—Control Versus
           Temik Treated: Tomato Juice-Control Versus Temik Treated: Tomato Paste-Control Versus
           Temik Treated. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-G)

100406     Vieira, M. (1977) Letter sent to P. Schroeder dated Jul 19, 1977 Efficacy of Temik in coffee
           beans. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Union Carbide
           de Brasil S.A., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-H)

100407     Ough, C. (1977) Letter sent to P. Darst dated Feb 1, 1977 Results of wine tasting: Temik
           treated grapes. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Univ.
           of California-Davis, Dept. of Viticulture and Enology, Agricultural Experiment Station,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,  VA; CDL:096734-I)

100408     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Animal Feeding Acceptance: Temik 10G. Summary of study
           096734-K. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; CDL:096734-J)

100409     Haines, R. (1970) Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to
           Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial Two. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,
           1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-K)

100694     Intera Environmental Consultants, Inc. (1982)  Effects of Varying Input Load and Degradation
           Rates on Simulated Regional Movement of Aldicarb in Ground Water in Long Island.  Rev.
           (Unpublished study received May 5, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide
           Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL: 247403-A)

101902     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) The Name, Chemical Identity and Composition of the Pesticide
           Chemical: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69;
           CDL:005151-A)

101903     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Efficacy of Temik on Various Crops. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Apr 12,  1971 under 1016-69; CDL:005151-B)

101904     Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide (Active Ingredient-
           -UC 21149): Technical Information for Testing Purposes: F-40977C. Summary of studies
           005593-A through 005593-C and 005594-B. (Unpublished study received Jul  19, 1966 under
           1016-69; CDL:005592-A)

101905     Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Transfer of Aldicarb from Temik 10G to Untreated Corn Cob
           Grits under Varied Temperature and Humidity Conditions. (Unpublished study received Nov
           24, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:024305-A)

101906     Union Carbide Corp. (19) Shelf Life of Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Oct 29,
           1969 under 1016-69; CDL:024310-C)

101907     Ridgway, R.;  Stokes, R.; Coppedge, J. (1969) Laboratory Evaluations of Release
           Characteristics of Various Carbon Based Granular Formulations of Aldicarb (Temik). (U.S.
           Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div.; unpublished study; CDL:024310-
           D)

101908     Back, R. (1969) Netherlands and Germany: Temik 10G Marketing: Summary  Report.
           (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:024310-E)
                                      Page 114 of 191

-------
101909     Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The Potential Hazard from Ingestion
           of Treated Plant Tissue. (Unpublished study received Nov 5, 1969 under 1016-69;
           CDL:024310-F)

101910     Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Residues: Temik 10G and Temik 15G. (Unpublished study
           received Jun21, 1974 under 1016-78; CDL: 026641-A)

101911     Haines,  R. (1971) Ingestion of Aldicarb by Human Volunteers: A Controlled Study of the
           Effects of Aldicarb on Man. (Unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-A)

101912     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) (Toxicity Studies of Temik 10G on Humans). (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; CDL:050847-B)

101913     Dernehl, C. (1971) Letter sent to R. Back dated Mar 30, 1971 Temik use on ornamentals.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-C)

101914     Weil, C.; McGee, M.; Baughman, J. (1970) Comparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik
           10GV and 15 Other Pesticide Formulations As Marketed: Special Report 33-15. (Unpublished
           study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon
           Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:050847-D)

101915     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Nature and Magnitude of
           Residues in Certain Ornamental Plants, Greenhouse Soils and Water. (Unpublished study
           received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; CDL:050847-E)

101916     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the Safety
           of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik 10G. Summary of studies 091000-B through 091000-F.
           (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-A)

101917     Weil, C. (1971) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 33-92. (Unpublished study
           received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; prepared by  Carnegie-Mellon Univ.,  Mellon Institute,
           Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,  submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
           CDL:091000-B)

101918     Weil, C.; Woodside, M.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1970)  Temik: Results of Feeding in the Diet of
           Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 33-59. (Unpublished study received May  3, 1972 under
           2F1188; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-C)

101919     Weil, C.; Woodside, M.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1970)  Temik (T), Temik Sulfoxide (TSO), Temik
           Sulfone (TSO2), 1:1 TSO:TSO2: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days: Special
           Report 33-81. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; prepared by
           Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-D)

101920     Dorough, H. (1970) Effect of Temik on Methyl Parathion Toxicity to Mice: PR-2771.
           (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; prepared by Texas A & M Univ.,
           Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-E)

101921     Schlinke, J. (1970) Toxicologic effects of five soil nematocides in chickens. American Journal
           of Veterinary Research 31(6): 1119-1121. (Also In unpublished submission received May 3,
           1972 under 2F1188; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-F)
                                      Page 115 of 191

-------
101922     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. Summary of study 091000-H.
           (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-G)

101923     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Magnitude of the Residues: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-I)

101924     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic  Temik Residues in Beef Liver by
           Gas Chromatograpny. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188;
           CDL:091000-J)

101925     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Summary of Performance Data-
           Sugarcane and Sweet Potatoes (Louisiana Only). (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972
           under 2F1188; CDL:091000-K)

101926     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Residue Studies of Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study
           received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:091371-A)

101928     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Residue Studies of Temik in Plants and Animals. Summary of
           studies 091372-B through 091372-Q. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
           9F0798; CDL: 091372-A)

101929     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Metabolism  of C14Temik in Cotton Plants
           under Field Conditions: File No. 10492. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
           9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-D)

101930     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Degradation of Temik ... in Potato Foliage: File
           No. 10495. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-F)

101931     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Metabolism  and Associated Residues of Temik
           in Spearment and Lettuce: File No. 10496. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
           9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091372-G)

101932     Dorough, H. (1968) Continual Feeding of Radio-labeled Temik to Lactating Dairy Cows.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by Texas A and M Univ.,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-H)

101933     Dorough, H. (1968) Continuous Feeding of Radiolabeled Temik to Laying Hens.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by Texas A and M Univ.,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-I)

101934     Bull, D.; Coppedge, I; Ridgway, R. (19) Fate of Temik in  Soil with Special Reference to
           Chemical Changes, Movement, and Volatilization. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service,
           Entomology Research Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals Investigations; unpublished
           study; CDL:091372-J)

101935     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Temik Metabolism: Fate of C14-Temik in
           Cultivated Soil: File No. 9218. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-K)

101936     Clarkson, V.; Weiden, M. (1968) Temik Insecticide: The Persistence of Temik in an
           Agricultural Soil As Indicated by Field and Laboratory Bioassay: File No. 10490.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           New York, NY; CDL:091372-L)
                                     Page 116 of 191

-------
101937     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Temik Metabolism: Degradation and Carry-
           over Properties of... (Temik) in Soil: File No. 10494. (Unpublished study received Apr 18,
           1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091372-M)

101938     Spurr, H.; Chancey, E. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Interactions between Temik and
           Microorganisms and Their Importance to Ecological Relationships in Soil: File No. 9208.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           New York, NY; CDL:091372-N)

101939     Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Field Evaluation of the
           Persistence and Movement of Temik and Its Carbamate Metabolites in Soil: File No. 10485.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           New York, NY; CDL:091372-O)

101940     Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Field Evaluation of the
           Persistence of Temik and Its Carbamate Metabolites in Pond Water and Their Effect on Pond
           Fauna: File No. 10491. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted
           by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-Q)

101941     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the Safety
           of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. Summary of studies 005593-C, 005594-B, 091373-B
           through 091373D, 091373-F through 091373-J, 091373-L, 091373-N through 091373-P,
           091373-R through 091373-U, 091373-W, 091373-Y, 091373-Z, 091373-AB, 091373-AC,
           126467-A, 126484-D, 126486-A, 126494-A, 131933-A. (Unpublished study received Apr 18,
           1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-A)

101942     Weil,  C.; Condra, N.; White, C.; et al. (1968) Temik 10 G-V (10.3% Granular Formulation of
           Compound 21149): Acute and 14-day Applications to Rabbits: Special Report 31-137.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by Mellon Institute,
           Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-D)

101943     Pozzani, U.; Kinkead, E.; Geary, D.; et al.  (1968) Temik 10G and Temik 10G-V: Response of
           Rats to Saturated Vapors Generated under Simulated Greenhouse Conditions: Special Report
           31-173. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by Mellon
           Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
           CDL:091373-F)

101944     Williams, F.  (1964) Agricultural Chemicals Compound 21149: Air Sampling While
           Formulating at Chemical Formulators, Inc. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
           9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-G)

101945     Williams, F.  (1964) Agricultural Chemicals Compound 21149: Air Sampling during Second
           Formulations at Chemical Formulators, Inc. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
           9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-H)

101946     Williams, F.  (1965) Air Sampling Report for Agricultural Chemical Compound 21149.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           New York, NY; CDL: 091373-1)

101947     Peele, R. (1966) Industrial Hygiene--Air Pollution Evaluation of Hazards Associated with the
           Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No. 66-
           IH-158-I-1. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-J)

101948     Union Carbide Corp. (1966) (Toxicity of Temik to Humans). (Unpublished study received
           Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:091373-L)
                                     Page 117 of 191

-------
101952     Weil, C.; Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1968) The Toxicity of Temik and Its Metabolites in
           Mint and Lettuce: Special Report 31-156. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under
           9F0798; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-R)

101953     Johnstone, V. (1967) Alleged Temik—Cherry Poisoning Incident, Wenatchee, Washington.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           New York, NY; CDL:091373-S)

101954     Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Waddell Case: Toxicity of Temik to Humans. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received  Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:091373-T)

101955     Dernehl, C. (1969) Letter sent to R. Haines dated Jan 9, 1969 Consideration of possible
           hazard to humans handling cotton plants treated with Temik. (Unpublished study received
           Apr 18,  1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY;
           CDL:091373-U)

101956     Back, R. (1968) Temik 10G Granular Pesticide: Field Evaluation of Potential Hazard to
           Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Apr 18,  1969 under 9F0798; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-AB)

101957     Lavoie, K. (1963) Bioassay  Record: UC-21149: Peromyscus: Test No. R-14. (U.S. Fish and
           Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Center; unpublished study, CDL:091373-AC)

101958     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Efficacy of Temik 10G on Cotton. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received on unknown date under 9F0798; CDL:092003-A)

101959     Lund, R.; Haines, R. (1969) Field Evaluation of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Potential
           Hazard to White-tail Deer and Cottontail Rabbits from Simulated Spills. (Unpublished study
           received Aug 20, 1970 under OF1008; prepared in cooperation with New Jersey, Fish and
           Game Commission, Black River State Game Field Station, submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-B)

101960     Clarkson, V.; Haines, R.; Hennsley, W.; et al. (1969) Report on Additional Field Tests with
           Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on the Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished
           study received Aug 20, 1970 under OF1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington,
           DC; CDL:091748-C)

101961     Haines, R. (1970) Field Evaluation of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to
           Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial I. (Unpublished study  received Aug 20, 1970
           under OF1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-D)

101962     Haines, R. (1970) Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to
           Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial II. (Unpublished study received Aug 20,  1970
           under OF1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-E)

101963     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Discussion of Performance: Temik lOG-Sugar Beets.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under OF1008; CDL:091748-F)

101964     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Metabolism in Plants: Temik.  Summary of studies 091748-H
           through 091748-J and 091748-L. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under OF1008;
           CDL:091748-G)
                                      Page 118 of 191

-------
101965     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1970) Metabolism of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide ... in
           Sugar Beets. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under OF1008; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-I)

101966     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Magnitude of the Residues: Aldicarb in Sugar Beets.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under OF1008; CDL:091748-K)

101967     Borough, H. (1970) Extraction of Radioactive Residues from Liver of Cow Fed 1.2 ppm
           Aldicarb-Aldicarb Sulfone-C14 in the Diet for 14 Days. (Unpublished study received Aug 20,
           1970 under OF1008; prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-L)

101968     Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Soil: Decline of Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Aug 20,
           1970 under OF1008; CDL:091748-M)

101969     Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Continual Feeding of Radio-labeled Temik to Lactating Dairy
           Cows. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 7F0573; CDL:092861-A)

101970     Maitlen, I; McDonough, L.; Beroza, M. (1966) Determination of 2-Methyl-2-
           (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime, Its Sulfoxide and Sulfone, by Gas
           Chromatography. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology  Research Div.;
           unpublished study; CDL:092861-B)

101971     Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Efficacy Studies of Temik on Potatoes. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Aug 22, 1967 under 7F0573; CDL:092861-E)

101972     Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Study of the Chemical Temik 10G. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573; CDL:092861-F)

101973     Romine, R. (1966) Determination of Temik Residues in Potatoes. (Unpublished study
           received Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, WV;
           CDL:092861-G)

101974     Romine, R. (1966) Determination of Temik Residues in Soil. (Unpublished study received
           Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, WV;
           CDL:092861-H)

101975     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Continual Feeding of Radiolabeled Temik  to Chickens.
           (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637; CDL:092931-A)

101976     Romine, R. (1967) Determination of Temik Residues in Cottonseed: (A Total Toxic Residues
           Method). (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., South Charleston, WV; CDL:092931-C)

101977     Andrawes, N.; Romine, R.; Bagley, W. (1973) Metabolism and residues of Temik aldicarb
           pesticide in cotton foliage and seed under field conditions. J. Agr. Food Chem. 21(3):379-386.
           (Also In unpublished submission received Jul 24, 1973 under 9F0798; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-A)

101978     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Determination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Cottonseed by
           Gas Chromatography: Basic Cottonseed Method: UC 21149-III-COTS.  (Unpublished study
           received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798;  CDL:093106-B)

101979     Back, R. (1970) Letter sent to G. Rohwer dated Jul 22, 1970: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide
           for use on cotton only. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-C)
                                     Page 119 of 191

-------
101980     Dernehl, C. (1970) Letter sent to R. Back dated Jul 13, 1970 Possible Temik poisoning of
           humans. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-D)

101981     Back, R. (1970) Letter sent to H. Hays dated May 12, 1970: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide for
           use on cotton only. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted
           by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-E)

101982     Romine, R. (1969) Letter sent to H. Alford dated Nov 12, 1969: Temik 10G, aldicarb
           pesticide for cotton pest control. (Unpublished study  received on unknown date under
           9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-G)

101983     Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The Potential Hazard from Ingestion
           of Treated Plant Tissue. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798;
           CDL:093106-H)

101984     Back, R. (1969) Letter sent to H. Alford dated Oct 29, 1969: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide.
           (Unpublished study received Oct 29, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide  Corp.,
           New York, NY; CDL:093106-1)

101985     Herrett, R. (1967) Letter sent to H. Stansbury dated Feb 7, 1967 Results of studies on the
           uptake of Temik by spearmint and tendergreen bean.  (Unpublished study received Jan 24,
           1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-L)

101986     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Dermal Toxicity of Formulated Products to Rats: (Four Hour
           Skin Penetration). (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798;
           CDL:093106-N)

101987     Union Carbide Corp. (19) Protocol for Evaluation of Exposure Hazard to Greenhouse
           Operators Using Temik 10G.  (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798;
           CDL:093106-O)

101988     Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Study of the Chemical Temik. (Compilation; unpublished  study
           received Jul 14, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:093106-R)

101989     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Reasonable Grounds in  Support of the Petition: Temik 10G.
           (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798;  CDL:093106-V)

101990     Union Carbide Technical Center (19) Determination  of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Milk
           by Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-III-Milk. (Unpublished study received Jun 29,  1970
           under OF1008; CDL: 093318-B)

101991     Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Determination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Beef Liver by
           Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-IIILiver. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under
           OF1008;CDL:093318-C)

101992     Union Carbide Technical Center (19) Determination  of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Sugar
           Beet Roots by Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-III-SBR.  (Unpublished study received  Jun
           29, 1970 under OF1008; CDL:093318-D)

101993     Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Determination of the Total Toxic Temik Residue in Sugar Beet
           Tops: UC 21149-III-SBT. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under OF1008;
           CDL:093318-E)
                                     Page 120 of 191

-------
101994     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik 10G.
           (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under OF1008; CDL:093318-F)

101995     Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Response to EPA Comments on Pesticide Petition 2F1188:
           Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-A)

101996     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Metabolism of... (Temik aldicarb pesticide) in
           potato plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19(4):731-737. (Also In unpublished submission received
           Aug 6, 1971  under 2F1188; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC;
           CDL:093511-B)

101997     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Sugarcane
           Stalk by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188;
           CDL:093511-F)

101998     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Sweet Potato
           Root by Gas  Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188;
           CDL:093511-G)

101999     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Residues in Sugarcane Leaves by
           Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-
           H)

102000     Weil,  C. (1974) Summary of Interpretation of Previously Presented Toxicity Data and Safety-
           factor Calculations for Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under
           3F1414; prepared in cooperation with Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical
           Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093775-A)

102001     Meeker, R. (1974) Response to EPA Letter of December 19, 1973 (Items 1,2 and 3)
           Regarding Pesticide Petition 3F1414 and Subsequent Discussion between EPA and UCC,
           January 11, 1974. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093775-D)

102002     Williams, C.  (1973) Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation. (Telephone conversation
           with R. Back; unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; prepared in
           cooperation with U.S. ABPR, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:
           093775-F)

102003     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Efficacy Study of Temik on Various Crops. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL:093775-G)

102004     Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Peanuts by Gas
           Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-H)

102005     Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Aldicarb Residues in Potato Tubers by Gas
           Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-I)

102006     Union Carbide Corp. (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide
           Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-
           J)

102007     Union Carbide Corp. (1973) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining,
           Including a Description of the Analytical Methods Used: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished
           study  received Jun 25, 1973  under 3F1414; CDL:093776-A)
                                     Page 121 of 191

-------
102008     Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. Summary of studies 093511-B,
           093776-D through 093776-F. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414;
           CDL:093776-B)

102009     Andrawes, N.; Moorefield, H. (1972) The Metabolism and Terminal Residues of Temik
           Aldicarb Pesticide in Peanut Plants under Field Conditions: Project No. 111A12; File No.
           17613. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093776-D)

102011     Lykins, H. (1969) Temik Insecticide: The Effect of Temperature and pH on the Stability  of
           Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in Water: Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished
           study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,  Washington,
           DC; CDL:093776-G)
102012     Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Residue Data for Aldicarb on Potatoes and Potato Chips.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093777-A)

102013     Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Residue Data for Aldicarb: Peanuts. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093777-B)

102014     Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Summary and Discussion of Results of Tests with Temik 10G
           Aldicarb Pesticide on Potatoes. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under
           3F1414; CDL:093779-A)

102015     Hodges, L. (1973) Letter sent to L. Terbush dated Nov 13, 1973: Aldicarb pesticide for use on
           potatoes and peanuts. (Unpublished study received Nov 13, 1973 under 3F1414; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093781-A)

102016     Reed, J.; Stier, E. (1969) Flavor Evaluation Report on Potatoes Treated with Aldicarb
           Pesticides. (Unpublished study received Nov 13, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by Rutgers
           Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093781-B)

102017     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide
           Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 1, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:095060-
           A)

102018     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Aldicarb: Residues in Meat, Milk, Soil and Various Crops.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 1, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:095060-B)

102019     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide
           Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096130-
           A)

102020     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Discussion of Temik Performance against Nematode and Insect
           Pests of Coffee. (Compilation; unpublished study received May 6,  1977 under 1016-69;
           CDL:096130-B)

102021     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik.
           (Unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69;  CDL:096130-C)

102022     Andrawes, N.; Dorough, H.; Lindquist, D. (1967) Degradation and elimination of Temik in
           rats. Journal of Economic Entomology 60(4):979-987. (Also In unpublished submission
           received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Co., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096131-O)
                                     Page 122 of 191

-------
102023     Knaak, I; Tallant, M.; Sullivan, L. (1966) The metabolism of 2-methyl-2-
           (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methyl-carbamoyl)oxime in the rat. J. Agr. Food Chem.
           14(6):573-578. (Also In unpublished submission received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096131-P)

102024     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Residue Studies of Aldicarb on Coffee. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096131-T)

102025     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Discussion of Performance: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 13, 1976 under 1016-69; CDL:096175-A)

102026     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received
           Aug 9, 1977 under 1016-78; CDL: 096302-B)

102027     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Aug 9, 1977 under 101678; CDL:096302-U)

102028     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik Aldicarb
           Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977 under 1016-78; CDL:096302-V)

102029     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Alleged Overexposure Cases Reported from Use of Temik
           Formulations. (Unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977 under 1016-78; CDL:096302-W)

102031     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Efficacy of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide on Pecan Aphids.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 under 1016-78; CDL:096319-A)

102035     Abdalla, N. (1977) Letter sent to F. Sanders dated Oct 19, 1977 Efficacy of Temik on various
           crops. (Unpublished  study received Oct 26,  1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096396-A)

102036     Heitmuller, T. (1972) Letter sent to S. Ichikawa dated Jan 7, 1972 Toxicity of Temik to grass
           shrimp.  (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze Laboratory; unpublished study;
           CDL:096397-B)

102037     Shell Chemical Co. (1971) Toxicity Testing: Temik. (Unpublished  study received Oct 26,
           1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096397-C)

102038     Hudson, R.; Tucker,  R.; Haegele, M. (1972) Effect of age on sensitivity: Acute oral toxicity of
           14 pesticides to mallard ducks of several ages. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
           (22):556561. (Also In unpublished submission received Oct 26, 1977 under 1016-69;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096397-E)

102047     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Aldicarb: Residues in Citrus. (Compilation; unpublished study
           received Jul 12, 1976 under 6F1829; CDL:096526-B)

102048     Lykins,  H.; Meeker,  R. (1971) Aldicarb Pesticide: Stability of Aldicarb in Water: Project No.
           111A13, File No. 16060. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted
           by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-C)

102049     Payne, L.; Stansbury, H.; Weiden, M. (1966) The synthesis and insecticidal properties of
           some cholinergic trisubstituted acetaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oximes. Journal of
           Agricultural and Food Chemistry 14(4):356-365. (Also In unpublished submission received
           Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096670-D)
                                      Page 123 of 191

-------
102050     Quraishi, M. (1972) Edaphic and water relationships of aldicarb and its metabolites. Canadian
           Entomologist 104(Aug): 1191-1196. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977
           under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-E)

102051     Richey, F.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Temik-Aldicarb Pesticide: Metabolism by Soils:
           Laboratory Studies: Project No. 111A12, File No. 17507. (Unpublished study received Dec 6,
           1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-H)

102052     Richey, F.; Hartley, W.; Sheets, K. (1977) Laboratory studies on the degradation of (the
           pesticide) aldicarb in soils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 25(1):47-51. (Also In
           unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-I)

102053     Romine, R.; Meeker, R. (1973) Accumulation of Aldicarb Residues in Fish Tissue from
           Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in Aquaria Water:
           Project No. 111A13, File No. 19009. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-
           69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-K)

102054     Sheets, K.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Metabolism of Aldicarb
           in Anaerobic Muskingum Silt Loam Soil: Project No. 111A13,  File No. 22196. (Unpublished
           study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
           VA; CDL:096670-M)

102055     Skrentny, R.; Ellis, J. (1970) Control of Aphis fabae on broad beans (Viciafaba) by the
           systemic action of gamma-BHC, thionazin and aldicarb. Pestic. Sci. l(Mar-Apr):45-48. (Also
           In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-N)

102056     Spengler, H.; Griffith, J.; Tamplin, W. (1968) Temik and Temik Metabolites: Vapor Pressure
           Data: Project No. 111A12, File No. 10819. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under
           101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-O)

102057     Stephen, J.; Durden, J. (1969) A Study of the Decomposition of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and
           Temik Sulfone in Water at 100 (degrees): Project No. 111A28,  File No. 11815. (Unpublished
           study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
           VA; CDL:096670-Q)

102058     Supak, J. (1972) The Volatilization, degradation, adsorption, and desorption characteristics of
           aldicarb ... in soils and clays. Taken from: Dissertation Abstracts 33(3):982. (Order no. 72-24,
           336; also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-R)

102059     Verstraete, W.; Voets, J. (19) Impact in sugarbeet crops  of some important pesticide treatment
           systems on the microbial and enzymatic constitution of the soil. Source unknown p. 1263-
           1277. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6,  1977 under 101669; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-S)

102060     Tobler,  E.; Johnson, H. (1970) Temik—Aldicarb Pesticide: Thermal Decomposition and
           Baseand Acid-hydrolysis of Temik: Project No. 116A16, File No.  14185.  (Unpublished study
           received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,  Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096670-T)

102061     Woodham, D.; Edwards, R.; Reeves, R.; et al. (1973) Total toxic aldicarb residues in soil,
           cottonseed, and cotton lint following a soil treatment with the insecticide on the Texas high
           plains. J. Agr. Food Chem. 21(2):303-307. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 9,
           1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-V)
                                      Page 124 of 191

-------
102062     Khasawinah, A. (1977) Environmental Chemistry of Aldicarb. Summary of studies 091000-
           H, 091372-C, 091372-E, 091372-O, 091372-Q, 091373-F, 096671-B through 096671-1,
           096671-M, 096671-P, 096671-R through 096671-Y. (Unpublished study received Dec 6,
           1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-A)

102064     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Fate and carryover properties of Temik aldicarb
           pesticide 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime in soil.
           Agricultural and Food Chemistry 19(4):727-730. (Also In unpublished submission received
           Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096671-C)

102065     Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer
           Solutions: Project No. 111A13, File No.  22263. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977
           under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096671-D)

102066     Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Aldicarb Sulfoxide in Aqueous Buffer
           Solutions: Project No. 111A13, File No.  223226. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977
           under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-E)

102067     Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Photochemical Transformation of Aldicarb: Project No.
           111A13, File No. 22335. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted
           by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-F)

102068     Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Photostability of Aldicarb Sulfoxide: Project No. 111A13,
           File No. 22325.  (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-G)

102069     Borash, A.; Kramer, V.; Moorefield, H. (1973) Experiments Designed To Trace Movements
           of Aldicarb in Soil: Project No. 111B13, File No. 17959. (Unpublished study received Dec 6,
           1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096671-H)

102070     Myers, R.; Weil, C; Condra, N.; et al. (1975) Temik 10G BC (Coal); 10G and 15G
           (Gypsum); 15G (Corn Cob): Comparative Toxicity Studies via Peroral, Dermal, and
           Inhalation Routes: Special Report 38-141. (Unpublished study received Dec 6,  1977 under
           1016-69; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene
           Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-M)

102071     Coppedge, I; Bull, D.; Ridgeway, R. (1977) Movement and persistence of aldicarb in certain
           soils. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 5(2):129-141. (Also In
           unpublished submission received Dec 6,  1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-P)

102072     Bartley, W.; Heywood, D. (1965) Metabolism Studies: Hydrolytic Stability of UC 21149:
           855-31101-7073. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-R)

102073     Hirsh, D.; Sheets, K.; Holsing, G. (1977) Aldicarb Subsequent Crop Residues: File No.
           23520. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-S)

102074     Hough, A.; Thomason, I; Farmer, W. (1975) Behavior of aldicarb in soil relative to control of
           Heterodera schachtii. Journal of Nematology 7(3):214-221. (Also In unpublished submission
           received Dec 6,  1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096671-T)
                                      Page 125 of 191

-------
102075     Iwata, Y.; Westlake, W.; Barkley, I; et al. (1977) Aldicarb residues in oranges, citrus by-
           products, orange leaves, and soil after an aldicarb soil-application in an orange grove. J.
           Agric. Food Chem. 25(4):933-937. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977
           under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-U)

102076     Jones, A. (1976) Metabolism of aldicarb by five soil fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24(1): 115-
           117. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-V)

102077     Kaufman, D. (1970) Pesticide metabolism. Pages 73-86, In Pesticides in the Soil: Ecology,
           Degradation and Movement: International Symposium on Pesticides in the Soil; Feb 25-27,
           1970, East Lansing, MI. S.I.: s.n.. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977
           under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-W)

102078     Kearby, W.; Ercegovich, C.; Bliss, M. (1970) Residue studies on aldicarb in soil and Scotch
           pine. Journal of Economic Entomology 63(4): 1317-1318. (Also In unpublished submission
           received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:096671-X)

102079     Leistra, M.; Smelt, J.; Lexmond, T. (1976) Conversion and leaching of aldicarb in soil
           columns. Pestic. Sci. 7:471-482. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under
           1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-Y)

102086     Stier, E. (1971) Summary on Sensory Evaluation of Potato Samples. (Unpublished study
           received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science,
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-A)

102087     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Sensory Evaluation of Cigarettes Made from Tobacco Treated
           with Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under
           1016-69; CDL:096682-C)

102088     Foremost Foods Co. (1977) Difference Testing-Kidney Beans: Control versus Temik
           Treated: Project No. 1387-RI(2). (Unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-E)

102089     Foremost Research Center (1977) Difference Testing: Fresh Tomatoes-Control versus Temik
           Treated; Tomato Juice-Control versus Temik Treated; Tomato Paste-Control Versus Temik
           Treated: Project No. 1387-RI(1). (Unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-F)

102090     Brasil, Secretaria da Agricultura (1977) Flavor Test in Coffee Treated with Temik 10G at the
           Rate of 60 Gr.  of Formulation per Mat. (Coordenacao de Assistencia Tecnica Integral,
           Departamento de Assistencia Supletiva; unpublished study; CDL:096682-G)

102091     Union Carbide Corp. (1978) Efficacy of Temik on oranges. (Unpublished study received Jan
           17, 1978 under 1016-69; CDL: 096715-A)

102104     Atkins, E.; Kellum, D.; Atkins, K. (1977) Repellent Additives to Reduce Pesticide Hazards to
           Honey Bees: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Bees as Pollinators of Agricultural  Crops:
           Project No. 3565-RR (W-139). Final rept. (Unpublished study received Jan 27,  1978 under
           10182-17; prepared by Univ. of California-Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural
           Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by ICI Americas, Inc., Wilmington, DE;
           CDL:096765-N)
                                      Page 126 of 191

-------
102113     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Efficacy Studies of Aldicarb on Oranges. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34; CDL:097217-A)

102114     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Fate of Aldicarb Residues (ppm) in Oranges under Commercial
           Processing: Complete Data from 3 FractionationLots: Report No. 1. (Unpublished study
           received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34; CDL:097217-B)

102115     Johnson, D. (1976) Aldicarb Residues in Valencia Oranges: Report No. 2. (Unpublished study
           received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
           VA; CDL:097217-C)

102116     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Discussion of Performance: Temik. Summary of study 097272-
           B. (Unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097272-A)

102117     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Studies on the Efficacy of Sorghum Nematicides. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097272-B)

102118     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Residues of Aldicarb in Meat, Milk, and Other Subjects.
           (Unpublished study received Oct 19, 1978 under 1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-B)

102119     Union Carbide Corp. (1978) Magnitude of the Residue:  Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Oct 19, 1978 under 1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-C)

102120     Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Studies on the Efficacy of Temik on Grapes. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Oct 19, 1978 under 1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-D)

102121     Union Carbide Corp. (1978) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining,
           Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used and Environmental Chemistry:
           Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78;
           CDL:097271-C)

102122     Interregional Research Proj ect No. 4. (1976) Nature of the Residue: (Aldicarb). (Unpublished
           study received Aug 10, 1977 under 7E1996; CDL:097785-A)

102123     Interregional Research Project No. 4. (1977) (Residue Studies for Aldicarb in or on Pecans).
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 under 7E1996; CDL:097785-U)

102127     Romanko, R. (1979)  Aldicarb Insecticide for Control of Hop Pests. (Unpublished study
           received Feb 8, 1979 under 38338-EX-4; prepared by Southwest Research & Extension
           Center, submitted by Univ. of Idaho, Twin Falls, ID; CDL:098220-A)

102128     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,  Inc. (1977) Nature of the Residue:  Aldicarb.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 27, 1979 under 9F2201; CDL:098223-A)

102129     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,  Inc. (1978) Residue Data for Aldicarb in Lemons,
           Limes and Grapefruit. (Unpublished study received Apr 27, 1979 under 9F2201;
           CDL:098223-B)

102130     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,  Inc. (1978) Residue Data for Temik in Citrus
           Juices. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 27, 1979 under 9F2201; CDL:098223-
           C)

102131     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Case of Tony Huerta, Allegedly Poisoned with Temik.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 21, 1970 under 1016-69; CDL:100338-A)
                                     Page 127 of 191

-------
102132     Fink, R.; Beavers, I; Brown, R. (1979) Final Report: Eight-day Dietary LC50~Bobwhite
           Quail: Technical Grade Aldicarb: Project No. 142-118. (Unpublished study received Dec 12,
           1979 under 1016-78; prepared by Wildlife International Ltd., submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-B)

102133     Schneider, C. (1979) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to the Rainbow Trout (Salmo
           gairdneri Richardson): UCES Proj. No. 11504-14-03. (Unpublished study received Dec 12,
           1979 under 1016-78; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-C)

102134     Schneider, C. (1979) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to the Bluegill Sunfish
           (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque): UCES Proj. No. 11504-14-04. (Unpublished study
           received Dec 12,  1979 under 1016-78; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:099120-D)

102135     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Discussion on Residues of Aldicarb Remaining in Plants and
           Soil from Treatments of Temik 10G to Ornamental Plants. (Unpublished study received Jun 3,
           1969 under 1016-69; CDL:101541-A)

102136     Union Carbide Corp. (19) Mortality of Temik-dosed Mice. (Unpublished study received on
           unknown date under unknown admin, no.; CDL: 102776-A)

102137     Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Criteria Measured at 6-month Kill, or to Date, 5-26-71, on Two-
           year Rat Feeding Study. (Unpublished study received Jun 11, 1971 under unknown admin.
           no.; CDL: 102785-A)

102138     Bartley, W. (1965) Letter sent to R. Haines dated Nov 22, 1965 Summary of work in plant
           metabolism on Temik. (Unpublished study received Nov 26, 1965 under unknown admin, no.;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Tarrytown, NY; CDL:123009-A)

102139     Union Carbide Corp. (1964) Summary and Discussion of Results of Residue Analyses of Raw
           Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149, 1963-1964. (Compilation; unpublished study
           received Feb 1, 1966 under unknown admin, no.; CDL:123032-B)

102140     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Discussion of Performance Tests: UC 21149. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; CDL:126441-A)

102141     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary and Discussion of Results of Residue Analyses of Raw
           Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149, 1963-1964. (Compilation; unpublished study
           received Sep 9, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; CDL:126443-B)

102142     Stansbury, H.; Johnson, D. (1964) Stability of... (20047) and ... (21149) in Animal Diets:
           Status Report: Project No. 143B15. (Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under unknown
           admin, no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126443-C)

102143     Weil, C.; DeMary, L.; Soo, V (1971) Comparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik
           10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations As Marketed: Special Report 34-76.
           (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin, no.; prepared by
           Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126446-A)

102144     Dernehl, C. (1972) Letter sent to R. Back dated Apr 28, 1972 Toxicity of Temik 10G in
           humans. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin, no.; submitted
           by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126446-B)

102145     Borash, A.; Bryant, H. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural Products: (Toxicity
           to Goldfish). (Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126467-A)
                                     Page 128 of 191

-------
102146     Lovell, C.; Quick, Q. (1967) Temik Insecticide: Determination of Temik by Infrared
           Spectroscopy: Project No. 111A25, File No. 7135. (Unpublished study received May 8, 1967
           under 1016EX-22; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126474-A)

102147     McDermott, W.; Quick, Q. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Determination of Acetone in Temik
           10G and Ambush 2G: Project No. 299A20, File No. 6549. (Unpublished study received Feb
           6, 1967 under 1016EX-22; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126474-
           C)

102148     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Results of Tests Conducted by and under the Supervision of
           Federal and State Agencies with UC 21149 Formulations on Ornamental Plant Pest Control--
           1962-1964. (Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under 1016-EX-22; CDL: 126475-A)

102149     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary of Selected Performance of UC 21149 on Various
           Pests on Cotton and Potatoes~1964-1965.  (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under
           1016-EX-24; CDL: 126479-A)

102150     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Petition Proposing Temporary Tolerance for Residue of UC
           21149 on and in Cottonseed and Potatoes.  (Unpublished study received Feb 1, 1966 under
           1016-EX-24; CDL: 126480-A)

102151     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Efficacy Studies of Carbamate Insecticides on Cotton.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received  Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126481-B)

102152     Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Accidental Poisoning Report: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study
           received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126483-A)

102153     Stansbury, H. (1966) Letter sent to G. Downard dated Oct 3, 1966: Temik 10G. (Unpublished
           study  received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington,
           VA; CDL: 126483-B)

102154     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Efficacy Studies of Insecticides on Various Crops. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126484-B)

102155     Ketcham, N. (1966) Analyses of Urine Specimens for Metabolite of UC21149: Project No.
           299A20, File No. 5882. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126494-A)

102156     Stansbury, H.; Wright, M. (1966) Area Ill-Agricultural Products Insecticide Temik: Standard
           Samples for Residue Analyses: 855-31106-7965.  (Unpublished study received Jul 26,  1966
           under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126494-B)

102157     Romine, R. (1966) Summary and Discussion: Temik. (Unpublished study received Jul 26,
           1966 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126496-B)

102158     Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Determination of Temik Sulfoxide in Human Urine.
           (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126496-C)

102159     Anderson, H. (1969) Letter sent to J. Harry dated May 21, 1969: Livestock poisoning
           involving Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received May 28, 1969 under 1016-EX-30;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126507-A)
                                     Page 129 of 191

-------
102160     United States of America Standards Institute (1969) Common Name forthe Pest Control
           Chemical... Aldicarb. New York, NY: USASI. (USAS K62.77-168; also In unpublished
           submission received Jul 14, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, VA; CDL:126507-B)

102161     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Efficacy Study of Temik onPlants. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Mar 11, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:126507-C)

102162     Union Carbide Corp. (19) Metabolic Pathway of Temik in Animals and Acute Toxicity of
           Metabolites. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-EX-24; CDL: 127018-
           A)

102163     Haines, R. (1968) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide: F40977E. (Unpublished
           study received May 1, 1968 under unknown admin, no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, VA; CDL:130982-A)

102164     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary and Discussion of Results of Residue Analyses of Raw
           Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149, 1963-1964. (Unpublished study received Sep 8,
           1965 under unknown admin, no.; CDL:130984-A)

102165     Union Carbide Corp. (1964) UC 21149 Acaricide/Insecticide/Nematocide: F-40977A.
           (Unpublished  study received Mar 1,  1964 under unknown admin, no.; CDL: 131906-A)

102166     Union Carbide Corp. (1965) UC 21149~Experimental Nematocide/Acaricide/Insecticide: F-
           40977B. (Unpublished study received Feb 1, 1965 under unknown admin, no.; CDL: 131907-
           A)

102167     Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Temik 10G Insecticide: Field Evaluation of Potential Hazard to
           Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Dec 5, 1968 under 1016-EX-30; CDL: 131937-
           A)

102169     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Handling and Safety Guide for Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide.
           SI: UCC. (Also In unpublished submission received May 18, 1970 under 1016-69;
           CDL:220187-A)

102170     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Information for Physicians on Therapy of Poisoning by Temik
           10G Aldicarb  Pesticide. (Unpublished study received May 18, 1970 under 1016-69;
           CDL:220187-B)

102171     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Efficacy of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received on unknown date under 1016-78; CDL:223960-A)

102172     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Treated with Temik.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-78; CDL:223960-B)

102173     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Efficacy of Temik Compounds on Oranges, Cotton and Other
           Crops for Control of Various Pests. (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 15, 1977
           under 1016-69; CDL:228048-A)

102174     Iwata, Y. (19) Residue Study of Aldicarb in New Growth Orange Leaves. (Unpublished study
           received Feb 15, 1977 under 101669; prepared by Univ. of California-Riverside, Dept. of
           Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 228048-B)

102177     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received
           Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; CDL: 232221-A)
                                     Page 130 of 191

-------
102178     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1970) Metabolism and Associated Residues of Temik
           (2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl)-oxime) in Sugar Beet
           Plants: Project No. 111B19, File No. 12694. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under
           1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-K)

102179     Andrawes, N.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Metabolism and Terminal Residues of Temik Aldicarb
           Pesticide in Flue Cured Tobacco: Project No. 111A12, File No. 17805. (Unpublished study
           received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA;
           CDL:232221-M)

102180     Khasawinah, A.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide:  Metabolism of
           Aldicarb in Green and Cured Tobacco and Pyrolysis Products in Smoke: Project No.  111A13,
           File No. 21978. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-N)

102181     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb  Studies on Tobacco.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; CDL:232221-O)

102188     Supak, J. (1972) The Volatilization, Degradation, Adsorption, and Desorption Characteristics
           of Aldicarb 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio) Propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl) Oxime in Soils
           and Clays. (Dissertation; unpublished study received Oct 23, 1978 under 1016-78; submitted
           by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 235942-A)

102189     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Alleged Temik Human Over-exposure
           Cases Reported in the U.S. (November 1976-July 1979). Summary of studies 238958-C
           through 238958-F. (Unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264-322; CDL: 238958-
           A)

102190     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1977) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record-
           -Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under
           264322; CDL:238958-B)

102191     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record:
           Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under
           264322; CDL:238958-C)

102192     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record:
           Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under
           264322; CDL:238958-D)

102193     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record:
           Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under
           264322; CDL:238958-E)

102194     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record:
           Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under
           264322; CDL:238958-F)

102195     Moorefield, H. (1979) Aldicarb Pesticide: Mechanism of Action and Therapy: Studies on
           Cholinesterase Inhibition by Aldicarb Pesticide.  Summary of studies 050847-A, 096131-P,
           235615-C, 241454-B through 241454-F, 241454-H, 241454-J through 241454-N and 241454-
           P through 241454-S. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by
           Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA;  CDL:241454-A)
                                      Page 131 of 191

-------
102196      Weiden, M. (1968) Insecticidal carbamoyloximes. J. Sci. Fd Agric., Suppl. P19-31. (Also In
            unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide
            Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-B)

102197      Yu, C.; Kearns, C.; Metcalf, R. (1972) Acetylcholinesterase inhibition by substituted phenyl
            N-alkyl carbamates. J. Agr. Fd. Chem. 20(3):537-540. (Also In unpublished submission
            received Dec  11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
            Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-C)

102198      Hastings, F.; Main, A.; Iverson, F. (1970) Carbamylation and affinity constants of some
            carbamate inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and their relation to analogous substrate
            constants. J. Agr. Food Chem.  18(3):497-502. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec
            11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
            Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-D)

102199      Reiner, E. (1971) Spontaneous reactivation of phosphorylated and carbamylated
            cholinesterases. Bull WldHlthOrg. 44:109-112. (Published study; CDL:241454-E)

102200      Reiner, E.; Simeon-Rudolf, V.  (1966) The kinetics of inhibition of erythrocyte cholinesterase
            by monomethylcarbamates. Biochem. J. 98:501-505. (Also In unpublished submission
            received Dec  11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
            Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-F)

102201      Chin, B.; Sullivan, L. (19) (Temik: Toxicity to Dogs). (Unpublished study received Dec 11,
            1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
            Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-H)

102202      Weil, C. (19)  (Toxicity of Aldicarb Pesticides to Rats). (Unpublished study received Dec 11,
            1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
            Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-J)

102203      Johnson, H.; Sullivan, L.; McGee, M. (1968) Temik (UC 21149): Antidotal Therapy in Rats
            following Administration of Multiple Lethal Doses: Special Report 31-146. (Unpublished
            study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene
            Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA;
            CDL:241454-M)

102204      Gordon, J.; Leadbeater, L.; Maidment, M. (1978) The protection of animals against
            organophosphate poisoning by pretreatment with a carbamate. Toxicology and Applied
            Pharmacology 43:207-216. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under
            264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA;
            CDL:241454-P)

102206      Goldberg, M.; Johnson, H. (1962) Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cmpd. 21149. (Unpublished
            study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by
            Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler,  PA; CDL:241454-R)

102207      Striegel, J.; Condra, N.; Haun, C.; et al. (1962) Pharmacodynamic Effects: (Compound
            21149): Report 25-53. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by
            Mellon Institute, submitted by Union  Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA;
            CDL:241454-S)

104551      Abdalla, N. (1977) Letter sent to F. Sanders dated Dec 5, 1977 Environmental chemistry of
            Temik. Summary of study 096732-B. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-
            79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-A)
                                      Page 132 of 191

-------
104552     Khasawinah, A. (1977) Environmental Chemistry of Aldicarb. Summary of studies 096732-C
           through 096732-AW. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-B)

104553     Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Sugar Beet
           Fractions by Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-III-SBF. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,
           1978 under 1016-79; CDL:096732-C)

104555     Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Fate and carryover properties of Temik aldicarb
           pesticide ... in soil. Agricultural and Food Chemistry 19(4):727-730. (Also In unpublished
           submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-E)

104556     Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer
           Solutions: File No. 22263. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-F)

104557     Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Aldicarb Sulfoxide in Aqueous Buffer
           Solutions: File No. 22326. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-G)
104558     Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Field Evaluation of the Persistence and
           Movement of Temik and Its Carbamates in Soil: File No. 10485. (Unpublished study received
           Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
           CDL:096732-P)

104559     Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Field Evaluation of the Persistence of
           Temik and Its Carbamate Metabolites in Pond Water and Their Effect on Pond Fauna: File
           No.  10491. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-Q)

104560     Kaufman, D. (19) Pesticide metabolism. Pages 73-86, In Pesticides in the Soil: Ecology,
           Degradation and Movement. By S.I.: s.n.. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 25,
           1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
           CDL:096732-Y)

104561     Lin, S.; Funke, B.; Schulz, J. (1972) Effects of some organophosphate and carbamate
           insecticides on nitrification and legume growth. Plant and Soil 37(3):489-496. (Also In
           unpublished submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide
           Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AB)

104562     Lykins, H. (1969) The Effect of Temperature and pH on the Stability of Temik, Temik
           Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in Water. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under
           1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AC)

104563     Lykins, H.; Meeker, R. (1971)  Stability of Aldicarb in Water: File No. 16060. (Unpublished
           study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research
           Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AD)

104564     Quraishi, M. (1972) Edaphic and water relationships of aldicarb and its metabolites. Canadian
           Entomologist 104(3): 1191-1196. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 25, 1978
           under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
           CDL:096732-AF)
                                      Page 133 of 191

-------
104565     Richey, F.; Hartley, W.; Singh, R. (1972) Water Leaching of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide,
           Aldicarb Sulfone and Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four Soil Types: File No.
           16669. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AG)

104566     Richey, F.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Upward Movement of Aldicarb through Soil during Water
           Evaporation: File No. 17526. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AH)

104567     Romine, R.; Meeker, R.; Roever, K.; et al.  (1972) Leaching of Aldicarb into Sandy Soil with
           Irrigation of a Temik Treated Sugar Beet Field: File No. 17079. (Unpublished study received
           Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by  Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
           CDL:096732-AK)

104568     Romine, R.; Meeker, R.; Gibson, C.; etal.  (1973) Accumulation of Aldicarb Residues in Fish
           Tissue from Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in
           Aquaria Water: File No. 19009. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AL)

104569     Romine, R.; Halstead, C.; Gibson,  C.; et al. (1968) Leaching Characteristics of Temik 10G in
           Soils: File No. 10902. (Unpublished study  received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:  096732-AN)

104570     Sheets, K.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Metabolism of Aldicarb in Anaerobic Muskingum
           Silt Loam Soil: File No. 22196. (Unpublished study received Jan 25,  1978 under 1016-79;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AO)

104571     Skrentny, R.; Ellis, J. (1970) Control of Aphis fabae on broad beans ... by the systemic action
           of gamma-BHC, thionazinand aldicarb. Pestic. Sci. 1 (Mar/Apr):45-48. (Also In unpublished
           submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AP)

104572     Tobler, E.; Johnson,  H. (1970) Thermal Decomposition and Baseand Acid-hydrolysis of
           Temik: File No. 14185. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted
           by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AV)

105062     Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (1980) Hydrolysis  Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and
           Aldicarb Sulfone.  (Unpublished study received Jun 15, 1982 under 264-318; submitted by
           Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:247685-A)

107125     Flanagin, R. (1977) Third Quarterly Report on Temik  15G. (Unpublished study received on
           unknown date under 1016-EX-34;  submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle
           Park, NC; CDL:237152-A)

107395     Vilkas, A. (1977) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to the Water Flea ...: UCES Proj.
           #11504-14-01. (Unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by
           Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096683-A)

107397     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received
           Aug 14, 1978 under  1016-78;  CDL: 097271-B)

107398     Fink, R.; Beavers, J.; Brown, R. (1979) Final Report: Acute Oral LD50~Mallard Duck:
           Technical Grade Aldicarb: Project No. 142119. (Unpublished study received Dec 12,  1979
           under 1016-78; prepared by Wildlife International, Ltd., submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-A)
                                      Page 134 of 191

-------
107399     Hall, K.; Le-minh, N. (1976) Shelf-stability of 2 Lb/US Gal Permethrin EC: Report Series
           TMU0191/76A. (Unpublished study received Dec 2, 1976 under 10182-EX-3; submitted by
           ICI Americas, Inc., Wilmington, DE; CDL:229013-B)

110506     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1982) The Results of Tests on the Amount of
           Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received May 4, 1982 under 2F2679; CDL: 070835-A)

110512     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1981) (Temik Efficacy Support Data and Residue
           Documentation for Use in Soybean Protection from Nematodes). (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Apr 19, 1982 under IL 82/4; CDL:247347-A)

111923     Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received
           May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL: 096131-A)

114335     Coate, W.; Mense, M.; Hardy, R.; etal. (1982) Subacute Inhalation Toxicity Study of a
           Pesticide Residue in Dogs: T3,T6, and to Type Cigarettes: Project No. 400-636. Final rept.
           (Unpublished study received Sep 3, 1982 under 264-330; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories
           America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle
           Park, NC; CDL: 248307-A)

115237     Mayberry, R.; Savage, J. (1978) Mutagenic activity of several pesticides using the salmonella
           test and saccharomyces D3 system. Taken from: Am. Soc. Microbiol, Abstracts on the Annual
           Meeting. S.I.: s.n.. (Abstract H  126; p. 125; also In unpublished submission received Oct 1,
           1982 under 432-482; submitted by Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, NJ; CDL:248482-B)

115301     Hill, E.; Camardese, M.  (1981) Subacute toxicity testing with young birds: Response in
           relation to age and interest variability of LC50 estimates. Avian and Mammalian Wildlife
           Toxicology 2:41-65.  (Also In unpublished submission received Oct 7, 1982 under 201-142;
           submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, DC; CDL:248514-U)

115963     Hartley, W.; Heywood, D. (1965) Insecticide 21149: Metabolism Studies, Hydrolytic Stability
           of UC 21149: UCC Status Report 855-31101-7073. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978
           under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
           CDL:096732-T)

117840     Johansen, C.; Eves, J. (1967) Bee Research Investigations,  1967. (Unpublished study received
           Oct 13,  1969 under OF0897; prepared by Washington State Univ., submitted by Fisons Corp.,
           Wilmington, MA; CDL:091551-H)

122315     Fisons, Inc. (1977) Bendiocarb: Occupational Safety Information. (Unpublished study
           received Sep 9, 1977 under unknown admin, no.; CDL:231544-B)

124047     Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Effectiveness Data: Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study
           received Oct 1, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:095061-A)

126065     Wilkinson,  C.; Babish, J.; Lemley, A.; et al. (1983) A Toxicological Evaluation of Aldicarb
           and Its Metabolites in Relation to the Potential Human Health Impact of Aldicarb Residues in
           Long Island Ground Water. (Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1983 under 264-330;
           prepared in cooperation with FMC Corp. and others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
           Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:249416-A)

126500     Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Human Monitoring Study of Field Application of Temik 15G.
           (Unpublished study received Apr 9, 1974 under 1016-EX-31; CDL:249763-A)
                                      Page 135 of 191

-------
126688     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Effectivness Data: Temik.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 25, 1983 under 264-330; CDL:071499-A)

127874     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Environmental Data: Aldicarb
           Pesticide: Soil and Water. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 15, 1983 under 264-
           330; CDL:250012-A)

128132     Weil, C.; DeMary, L.; Soo, V. (1971) Comparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik
           10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations as Marketed: Special Report 34-76.
           (Unpublished study received Oct 27, 1971 under 1016-EX-31; prepared by CarnegieMellon
           Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:249766-A)

129300     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Results of Tests on the Amount of
           Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: (Aldoxycarb in
           or on Vegetable Crops). (Compilation; unpublished study received May 17, 1983 under 264-
           401; CDL:071609-E)

129660     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Environmental Effects of Temik and
           Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 2, 1983 under 264-330;
           CDL:250888-A)

129661     Oshima, R.; Torres, G.; Nelson, S.; et al. (1980) Monitoring Selected Ground Water Basins
           for the Presence of Aldicarb: A Cooperative California Interagency Study. (Unpublished
           study received Aug 2, 1983 under 264-330; prepared by California Dept. of Food and
           Agriculture and Others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.,
           Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:250888-B)

129662     Hansen, I; Spiegel, M. (1980) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and
           Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received Aug 2, 1983 under 264-330; submitted by
           Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:250888-C)

131661     Schardein, I; Leng, J. (1983) Teratology Study in Rabbits: Aldicarb: 369-107.  (Unpublished
           study received Oct 18, 1983 under 264-330; prepared by International Research and
           Development Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research
           Triangle  Park, NC; CDL:251510-A)

132500     Jones, R. (1982) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated Nov 16, 1982: Data on movement of aldicarb in
           soil-impact of irrigation. (Unpublished study received Nov 18,  1982 under 264-330;
           submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC;
           CDL:248850-A)

132501     Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (19) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb
           Sulfone.  (Unpublished study received Nov 18, 1982 under 264-330; submitted  by Union
           Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,  Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:248851-A)

132647     Weil, C.  (1971) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: (Sevin and Other Compounds on Rats):
           Special Report 34-71. (Unpublished study received Nov 3, 1983 under 264-324; prepared by
           Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
           Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,  Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251719-G)

132668     Schardein, J.; Leng, J.; Aldridge, D.; et al. (1983) Teratology Study in Rabbits: Aldicarb: 369-
           107. (Unpublished study received Oct 19, 1983 under 264-330; prepared by International
           Research and Development Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
           Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251731-A)
                                      Page 136 of 191

-------
132989     Ashton, A.; Jackson, W. (1983) Letter sent to Union Carbide dated Nov 18, 1983: Temik field
           trial (Michigan): Effects on wildlife. (Unpublished study received Dec 13,  1983 under 264-
           330; prepared by Bowling Green State Univ., submitted by Union Carbide  Agricultural
           Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251947-A)

133377     Enfield, C.; Carsel, R.; Cohen, S.; et al. (1980) Methods of Approximating Transport of
           Organic Pollutants to Groundwater. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1983 under 100-
           617; prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and
           Development, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
           Corp., Greensboro, NC; CDL: 072211-N)

133485     Hansen, I; Jones, R. (1983) Tile-drained Corn: 1983 Studies Conducted in Michigan and
           Indiana. (Unpublished study received Dec  13, 1983 under 264-330; submitted by Union
           Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251946-A)

133499     Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1983) Temik and Standak Tobacco Field Studies: 0352G. (Unpublished
           study received Dec 13, 1983 under 264318; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural
           Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251971-A)

134490     Hays, H.W.; Drill, V.A.; Friess, S.L.; et al. (1980) TemikA(R)I Aldicarb Pesticide Review of
           Toxicological Data and Determination of Acceptable Daily Intake. (Unpublished study
           received Sep 26, 1980 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by Drill, Friess, Hays, Loomis
           and Shaffer, Inc. and Johns Hopkins Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
           Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:243334-A)

135030     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1976) The Name, Chemical Identity and
           Composition of the Pesticide Chemical:  Aldicarb in Dry Beans and Soybeans. (Compilation;
           unpublished study received Aug 10,  1976 under 6F1849;  CDL:096405-A)

135031     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1976) The Results of Tests on the Amount of
           Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb in Dry
           Beans and Soybeans. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1976 under 6F1849;
           CDL:096405-B)

135437     Romine, R. (1979) Letter sent to J. Lovelli; P. Schroeder dated Jul 11, 1979 Methodology for
           determination of residues: Standak. (Unpublished study received Jul  18, 1979 under 1016-79;
           submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 098391-C)

135901     Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Efficacy of Temik 10G Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished
           study received Dec 16, 1970 under 1016-69; CDL:005150-A)

135902     Haines, R. (1972) Letter sent to J. Touhey dated Mar 4, 1972: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide:
           Amend to combine cotton and sugar beet directions for use. (Unpublished study received Mar
           3, 1972 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;
           CDL:005152-A)

136597     Carpenter, C.; Condra, N.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G (10.5% Granular Formulation
           of Compound 21149): 15-Day Dermal Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80. (Unpublished
           study received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-69; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC;  CDL:005580-A)

137875     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1980) Residue: Aldicarb in Water.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 13, 1984 under 264-330; CDL:252965-A)
                                      Page 137 of 191

-------
137876     Hansen, I; Romine, R.; Jones, R. (1984) Long-term Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb Sulfoxide
           and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received Apr 13, 1984 under 264-330; submitted
           by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:252966-
           A)

138037     Union Carbide Corporation (1964) UC 21149-Experimental Nematocide/
           Acaricide/Insecticide: F-40977B. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473;
           CDL:090526-A)

139863     Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity of Temik, Temik
           Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone Bluegill Sunfish. Project No. 111B32. (Unpublished study
           received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37;  submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.;
           CDL:238153-C)

139865     Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik: (2-Methyl-2-
           methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-methylcarbamoyloxime) and Related Carbamates: Special
           Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 18,  1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by
           Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union
           Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:238153-I)

140001     Romine, R.R. (1976) Letter sent to R.S. Flanagin dated Jan 16, 1976: Citurs fractionation.
           (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; submitted by Union Carbide Corp.,
           Washington, D.C.; CDL:096440-A)

140367     Back, R.C. (1970) Letter sent to Harold G. Afford dated Mar 2, 1970: Temik 10G aldicarb
           pesticide-Third and final periodic report. (Unpublished study received Mar 3, 1970 under
           1016-EX30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:  126506-A)

140487     Interregional Research Project No. 4 (1977) The Results of Tests  on the Amount of Residue
           Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb in Pecans.
           (Compilation; unpublished study received  Aug 10, 1977 under 7E1996; CDL: 097371-A)

142079     Cimino, M.; Galloway, S.; Ivett, J. (1984) Mutagenicity Evaluation of Aldicarb Technical
           93.47% in the Mouse bone marrow cytogentic Assay: Final Report: Project No. 22202.
           Unpublished study prepared by Litton Bionetics, Inc. 21 p.

142080     Sansebastian, J. (1984) CHO Metaphase Analysis In Vitro Chromosome Aberration Analysis
           in Chinese Hamster ovary cells: Aldoxycarb Technical: Study No. PH 320-UC-005-83.
           Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 33 p.

142081     Godek, E. (1984) Rat Hepatocyte Primary  Culture/DNA Repair Test: Aldicarb Technical:
           Study No. PH 31 l-UC-005-83. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Research
           International, Inc. 48 p.

142082     Dejonckheere, W. (19) Leaching in Soil and Uptake Bij Sugarbeets of Aldicarb and
           Thiofanox. Unpublished study prepared by state Uni. Of Gent (Belgium). 25 p.

142083     Hirsh,  D.; Sheets, K. (1977)  Aldicarb Subsequent Crop Residues: Project No. 812C20.
           Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 12 p.

142084     Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984)  Monitoring of Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb Residues on North
           Carolina and Virginia Tobacco Fields: VO352g. Unpublished study prepared by Union
           Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 23 p.
                                      Page 138 of 191

-------
142085     Hansen, I; Jones, R. (1984) Monitoring of Aldicarb Residues in Michigan and Indiana Tile-
           drained corn Fields: 0332g/015g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
           Products Co., Inc. 19 p.

142086     Hansen, I; Jones, R. (1984) Degradation and movement of Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb
           Residues in Arizona cotton: V4639. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
           Agricultural Products Co. 17 p.

142088     Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Oxidation Mechanism Studies: 0596g.
           Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,  Inc. 13 p.

142089     Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone
           Groundwater Degradation Mechanism Studies: V4654. Unpublished study prepared by Union
           Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. lip.

142090     Bussain, R. (1984) (Temik Residues in Soil). Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
           Agr. Prod. Co., Inc. 24 p.

142091     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) (Temik Residues in Water).
           Unpublished study. 41 p.

142092     Jones, R.; Rourke, R.; Hansen, J. (1984) Effect of Application Methods on Movement and
           Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in Maine Potato Fields: 0436g. Unpublished study. 28 p.

142093     Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Degradation And Transport of Aldoxycarb Residues in Southern
           Florida: V4637. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
           Inc. 14 p.

142094     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) (Temik Residues in Soil): 0400g.
           Unpublished compilation. 10 p.

142095     Poter, K.; Lemley, A.; Hughes, H.; et al. (1984) Developing Information. On Aldicarb Levels
           in Long Island Groundwater: 0483g. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell University and
           Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 40 p.

142096     Hughes, H.; Trautmann, N.; Porter, K.  (1984) Tracking Aldicarb Residues in Long Island
           Ground Water: Interim Results. Unpublished study prepared by  Cornell University. 32 p.

144970     Jackson, W. (1984) Letter sent to T. DeWitt dated June 21, 1984: [A Field study to evaluate
           the hazard to birds in Corn Fields treated with Temik. 6 p.

144971     Supak, J.; Swoboda, A.; Dixon, J. (1977) Volatilization and Degration Losses of Aldicarb
           From Soil. J. Environ. Qual. 6(4):413417.

145704     Union Carbide Corporation (1979)[Efficacy Data Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide].
           Unpublished compilation. 291 p.

147055     Eisler, M. (1966) Adaptation of the Liver to Heptachlor and Its Epoxide. Unpublished study
           prepared by Velsicol Chemical Corporation. 6 p.

148168     Stankowski, L. (1985) CHO/HGPRT Mammalian Cell Forward Mutation  Assay: Aldicarb:
           PH 314-UC-003-84. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Research International, Inc.
           35 p.
                                      Page 139 of 191

-------
148685      Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Eichler, A. (1977) Temik lOG-Gypsum Formulation (Blue): Wildlife
            Surveys following Application to Four Sugar Beet and Four Potato Fields: UNC 57/774581.
            Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 255 p.

148686      Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the Palatability to the Ring-
            necked Pheasant of Three Formulations of Temik 10 G with Other Granular Pesticides:
            UNC/69C/78938. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 23 p.

148687      Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the Palatability to the Zebra
            Finch of Two Formulations of Temik: UNC 69 G/78398. Unpublished study prepared by
            Huntingdon Research Centre. 16 p.

148688      Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the Palatability to the Ring-
            necked Pheasant of Two Formulations of Temik: UNC 69 G/78399. Unpublished study
            prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre.  14 p.

148689      Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1979) The Effect of Granule Size on the Toxic Hazard to
            Passeriformes of Temik 10G: UNC 69B/ 78721. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon
            Research Centre. 16 p.

148690      Stickel, W. (1979) Letter sent to R. Back dated May 29, 1979: [Comments on "Report on
            palatability studies and trials regarding the acute toxicity of the plant protection products
            Temik 10 G and Temik 10 GGF (gypsum) with Japanese quails, chickens and sparrows"].
            Prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. 3 p.

148691      Tait, F. (1972) Aldicarb: Wild Life Survey 1972. Unpublished study prepared by Duphar-
            Midox Ltd. 28 p.

148692      United Kingdom, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, Pest Infestation Control
            Laboratory (1974) A Study of the Effects of Aldicarb or Wildlife. Unpublished study. 65 p.

148693      Brown, P.; Bunyan, P.; Stanley, P.; et al. (1975) Field Surveillance of the Possible Wildlife
            Hazards Associated with the Use of the Nematicide, Aldicarb: Chemistry Department Report
            No. 17. Unpublished study prepared by U.K. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food,
            Pest Infestation Control Laboratory. 57 p.

148694      Spencer, D.  (1985) A Review of the Research Conducted on the Toxicity and Potential
            Hazard of Granular Formulations of Aldicarb (Temik) to Bird Life. Unpublished study. 32 p.

148695      Balcomb, R.; Stevens, R.; Bowen, C. (1984) Toxicity of 16 granular insecticides to wild-
            caught songbirds. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 33:302-307.

148696      Back, R. (1968) Temik 10G Granular Pesticide: Field Evaluation of Potential Hazard to
            Bobwhite Quail. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp.  15 p.

148697      Benjamini, L. (1981) The efficacy of seed treatment with aldicarb to establish conditioned
            aversion in birds to sprouting sugar beets. Phytoparasitica 9(l):3-9.

148698      Benjamini, L. (1981) Testing aldicarb as a bird repellent in a sprouting sugar beet field.
            Phytoparasitica 9(2):89-94.

148699      Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B. (1970) Temik Insecticide: Field Evaluations of the Toxic Hazard of
            Temik Formulations  10G, 10GV, 10GC and 10GVB4 to Bobwhite Quail: Project No.
            111B32: File No. 12676. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 15 p.
                                      Page 140 of 191

-------
148700      Haines, R. (1970) Temik 10G Granular Pesticide: Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of
            Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants in Sugar Beet
            Plantings: Trial III. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 8 p.

148701      Haines, R. (1971) Continued Field Evaluations on the Potential Hazard of Temik 10G
            Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ringnecked Pheasants in a Cotton Planting.
            Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide  Corp. 7 p.

148702      Haines, R. (1971) Continued Field Evaluations on the Potential Hazards of Temik 10G
            Aldicarb Pesticide to Bob White Quail in Cotton Plantings. Unpublished study prepared by
            Union Carbide Corp. 7 p.

148703      Hill, E.; Camardese, M. (1984) Toxicity of anticholinesterase insecticides to birds: Technical
            grade versus granular formulations. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 8:551-563.

148704      Hilbig, V.; Westphal, D.; Lucas, K.; et al. (1979) Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur
            Vogeltoxizitaet mit Zwei Granulatformulierungen des Nematizides Temik [Comparative
            Studies of the Toxicity to Birds of Two Granulated Formulations of Temik Nematocides]:
            Vetmed-Berichte 2/1979. Unpublished study prepared by Institute of Veterinary Medicine. 24
            P-

148705      Lund, R. (1970) Summary of Field Observations: Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb
            Pesticide to Ring-necked Pheasant... from Simulated Spills. Unpublished study prepared by
            State of New Jersey, Dept. of Conservation and Economic Development, Black River
            Wildlife Management Area. 2 p.

148706      Medd, R.; Roberts, N. (1972) Palatability and Acceptability of Temik (Corn Cob and Coal
            Formulations) to the Pheasant and the Pigeon:  5419/72/815. Unpublished study prepared by
            Huntingdon Research  Centre. 31 p.

148707      Medd, R.; Burrows, I.; Roberts, N.; et al. (1972) The Determination of the Single Dose Oral
            LD50 (24 Hour Value) and Residual Levels of Temik (Coal) in the Pheasant: Amended:
            5355/72/751. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 28 p.

148708      Relton, J. (1970) Wild Life Survey: Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on  Sugar Beets: Suffolk,
            England, 1970.  Unpublished study, lip.

148709      Ross, D.; Roberts, N.;  Cameron, D. (1977) A Comparison of the Acute Oral Toxicity (LD50)
            of Three Formulations of Temik to the Japanese Quail: UNC 68 W/771042. Unpublished
            study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 12 p.

148963      Jones, R.; Rourke, R.;  Hansen, J. (1985) Effect of Application Methods on Movement and
            Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in Maine Potato Fields:0830g. Unpublished study prepared
            by the University of Maine in cooperation with Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.
            30 p.

148964      Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; Romine, R. (1984) Unsaturated Zone Studies on the Degradation and
            Movement of Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb Residues: Preliminary Draft:0702g. Unpublished
            study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 69 p.

148965      Jones, R. (1985) Field, Laboratory, and Modeling Studies on the Degradation and Transport
            of Aldicarb Residue in Soil and Groundwater:0886g. Unpublished study prepared by Union
            Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. 19 p.
                                      Page 141 of 191

-------
148966 Hansen, I; Romine, R.; Jones, R. (1984) Long-term Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb Sulfoxide
and Aldicarb Sulfone:Draft: 0167g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 20 p.

148967 Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Oxidation Mechanism Studies:Preliminary
Draft:0596g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company,
Inc. 13 p.

148968 Jones, R.; Hansen, J. (1984) Central California Studies on the Degradation and Movement of
Aldicarb Residues:Preliminary Draft: 0729g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 29 p.

148969 Otten, R. (1985) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated April 18, 1985: [Two Week Dose Rangefmding
Study in Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb Technical]: Project NO. 400-705. Prepared by Union
Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. 9 p.

148970 Wisconsin Association of Manufacturers and Commerce (1985) A Review and Critique of
Proposed Groundwater Standards under NR140 as Submitted by the Wisconsin Department of
Health and Social Services. Unpublished study. 81 p.

148971 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. (1985) New Registration Data Submitted
for Aldicarb Special Review: Residue [Grapefruit]. Unpublished study. 5 p.

149696 Johansen, C.; Mayer, D.; Eves, J.; et al. (1983) Pesticides and bees. Environ. Entomology
12(5):1513-1518.

149699 Hays, H. (1980) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Review of Toxicological Data and Determination
of Acceptable Daily Intake. Unpublished study prepared by Drill, Friess, Hays, Loomis and
Shaffer, Inc. 31 p.

150006 Obrist, J. (1984) Comparison of Leaching Behavior of NEMACUR and Temik: Rept. No.
86288. Unpublished study prepared by Mobay Chemical Corp. 5 p.

150181 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1984) Aldicarb Residues in Forage, Fodder and
Grain from Field Corn Treated with Temik 15G. Unpublished study. 31 p.

151820 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1985) Aldicarb Residues in Grape Products
from Simulated Commercial Wine Processing. Unpublished compilation prepared in
cooperation with Morse Laboratories. 22 p.

152095 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1984) The Names, Chemical Identity and
Composition of the Pesticide Chemical [Aldicarb and Various Formulations). Unpublished
compilation. 79 p.

154893 Myers, W. (1985) The Determination of the Anticipated Residue Values of Aldicarb in
Potatoes and Citrus. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products,
Inc. 76 p.

156961 Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Laboratory Studies on the Degradation
Mechanisms of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone. Unpublished study
prepared by University of Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 73 p.

156962 Jones, R. (1986) Central California Studies on the Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb
Residues: Preliminary Draft. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
Products Co. 66 p.
Page 142 of 191

-------
156963      Dierberg, F.; Given, C. (1986) Aldicarb studies in ground waters from Florida citrus groves
            and their relation to ground-water protection. Ground Water 24(1): 16-22.

156964      Porter, K.; Wagenet, R.; Hughes, H.; et al. (1986) Field Research on Aldicarb Management
            Practices for Upstate New York:  [Degradadation of Aldicarb in Soils and Ground Waters--
            Field Studies]. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell University and Union Carbide
            Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 26 p.

156965      Jones, R.; Black, G.; Estes, T.; et al. (1986) Comparison of Computer Model Predictions with
            Unsaturated Zone Field Data for Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb. Unpublished study prepared by
            Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 20 p.

156966      Hegg, R.; Shelley, W.;  Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb
            Residues in South Carolina Loamy  Sand Soil. Unpublished study prepared by Clemson
            University and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 28 p.

156967      Carsel, R.; Parrish, R.;  Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Characterizing the Uncertainty of Pesticide
            Leaching in Agricultural Soils. Unpublished study prepared by US Environmental Protection
            Agency and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 49 p.

156968      Jones, R.; Anderson, M.; Hornsby, A.; et al. (1986) Saturated Zone Movement and
            Degradation of Aldicarb Residues on the Florida Ridge: Preliminary Draft. Unpublished study
            prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., University of Wisconsin, and
            University of Florida. 274 p.

157027      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1986)  Advisory: Temik Aldicarb Residues in
            Potable Water. Unpublished compilation. 94 p.

157987      Thomas, P. (1986) 34 Day Immunotoxicology Study of Aldicarb in Mice: Final Report: IITRI
            Project L08125.  Unpublished study prepared by IIT Research Institute. 339 p.

158262      Crisp, C. (19) The Molecular Design of Systemic Insecticides and Organic Functional Groups
            in Translocation. Unpublished study prepared by US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service,
            Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment  Station, Berkley, CA. 54 p.

158572      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. Inc. (1986) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide:
            [Residue Data and Associated Human Illness]. Unpublished compilation. 96 p.

159569      Lee, R.; Andrawes, N.  (1986) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide:  Aldicarb Anaerobic Aquatic
            Degradation: Project No. 803R10. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
            Products Co., Inc. 26 p.

159570      Andrawes, N.; Lee, R.  (1986) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide:  Aldicarb Metabolism in
            Lactating Goats: Project No.  803R10. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
            Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 52 p.

159571      Hudson, J.; Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Stability of Residues in Frozen
            Milk and Beef Liver: Project No. 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide
            Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 24 p.

159572      Hudson, J.; Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Potato Processing Study: Project
            No. 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,  Inc.
            23  p.

159573      Myers, W. (1986) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated Feb 28, 1986: Temik/soybean processing
            study. Prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 5 p.
                                       Page 143 of 191

-------
160086     Back, R. (1985) A Review of Tests for Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Residues in Drinking Water
           Samples by State, USA and Canada, 19791984. Unpublished study prepared by Union
           Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 9 p.

161701     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) Experimental Determination of the
           Degradation Rate of Aldicarb Residues in Long Island Groundwater. Unpublished study. 21
           P-

161702     Wyman, I; Jensen, I; Curwen, D.; et al.  (1983) Effects of Application Procedures and
           Irrigation on Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb Residues in Soil. Unpublished study
           prepared by University of Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. Inc. 49 p.

161703     Wyman, I; Curwen, D.; Hansen, J. (1984) Wisconsin Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb:
           Environmental Monitoring Study. Unpublished study prepared by University of Wisconsin
           and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 19 p.

161704     Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Studies on Temik and Standak
           Tobacco Fields. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 19
           P-

161705     Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Tile-drained corn 1983 Studies Conducted in Michigan and
           Indiana. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 16 p.

161706     Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study: Temik and Standak Treated
           Arizona Cotton. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.,
           Inc. 17 p.

161707     Waggonet, R.; Porter, K.; Hansen, J.; et al. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study on Temik
           Treated New York Potato Fields. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell University and
           Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 15 p.

161708     Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study on Temik Treated Washington
           Potato Fields. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc.
           13 p.

161709     Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) Fate of Aldicarb in Florida Citrus  Soils.
           Unpublished compilation. 102 p.

161733     Rourke, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study on Temik Treated
           Maine Potato Fields: Preliminary Draft. Unpublished study prepared by University of Maine
           and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 22 p.

161734     Myers, W. (1984) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, including a
           Description of the Analytical Method Used: [Aldicarb on Grapes]. Unpublished compilation.
           67 p.

162562     Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Residue in Instant Coffee: Laboratory Project
           Id.: 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. and
           General Foods Corp. 39 p.

162745     McCann, J.; Teeters, W.; Urban, D.; et al. (1981) A short-term dietary toxicity test on small
           mammals. P.  132-142 of the Second Conference of Avian and Mammalian Wildlife
           Toxicology; published in American Society for Testing and Materials; 1981.
                                      Page 144 of 191

-------
163274      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Rotational
            Crop Residues: [Summary]. Unpublished study. 39 p.

163275      Maitlen, J. (1982) Persistence of aldicarb in soil relative to the carry-over of residues into
            crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30(3): 589-592.

163276      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1986) Temik/Plant Back: Registration
            Analytical Chemistry Project Outline 1986: [Protocol To Determine Magnitude of Aldicarb
            Residue in Plantback Crops]: Project No. T86-000-R06. Unpublished compilation. 12 p.

164424      Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1967) Summary and Discussion [of Temik
            Residues in and on Potatoes and Soil]. Unpublished compilation. 107 p.

164934      Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Residue Data on UC 21149 Attached to and Constituting a Part
            of an Application for Temporary Permit To Ship Temik 10G. Unpublished compilation. 84 p.

165576      Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Summaries of Performance Data: Temik 10G Ornamental Plants.
            Unpublished compilation. 343 p.

5008199    Iverson, F. (1976) Binding constants for tetramethylammonium ion determined with
            irreversible inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry 54(10):918-
            920.

5008363    Hudson, R.H.; Haegele, M.A.; Tucker, R.K. (1979) Acute oral and percutaneous toxicity of
            pesticides to mallards: correlations with mammalian toxicity data. Toxicology and Applied
            Pharmacology 47(3):451-460.

5008444    Baron, R.L. (1978) Terminal residues of carbamate insecticides. Pure and  Applied Chemistry
            50(5):505-509.

5008717    Dorough, H.W. (1977) Metabolism of Carbamate Insecticides. Research Triangle Park, N.C.:
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Effects Research Laboratory.  (EPA report no.
            EPA-600/1-77-012; available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-266 223)

5008720    Rodell, S.; Funke, B.R.; Schulz, J.T. (1977) Effects of insecticides on acetylene reduction
            byAzotobacter vinelandiiand soybean nodules. Plant and Soil 47(2):375-381.

5010222    Worthing, C.R. (1969) Performance of some new insecticides againstMyzus persicae(Sulzer)
            andTetranychus urticae(Koch) on year-round chrysanthemums. Journal of Horticultural
            Science 44(3):235-246.

5010817    Coppage, D.L. (1977) Anticholinesterase action of pesticidal carbamates in the central
            nervous system of poisoned fishes. Pages 93-102,InPhysiological Responses of Marine Biota
            to Pollutants, Proceedings of a Symposium; Nov, 1975, Milford, Connecticut. Edited by F.J.
            Vernberg, A. Calabrese, P.P. Thurberg and W.B. Vernberg. New York: Academic Press.

5010818    Harvey, J., Jr. (1975) Metabolism of Aldicarb and methomyl. Pages 389-393,InPesticides:
            International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Third International Congress; Jul 3-9,
            1974, Helsinki, Finland. Edited by F. Coulston and F. Korte. Stuttgart,  West Germany:
            George Thieme. (Environmental quality and safety supplement, vol. Ill)

5016283    Lindquist, R.K.; Spadafora, R.R. (1974) Insecticides for greenhouse whitefly  control on
            poinsettias. Pages 5-6,InOhio Florists' Association Bulletin No.  536. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio
            Florists' Association.
                                       Page 145 of 191

-------
5017001     Gaikawad, S.T.; Samantaray, R.N.; Patnaik, S. (1973) Effect of soil application of biocides on
            N, P, K availability and C, N transformations in flooded rice soils. Journal of the Indian
            Society of Soil Science 21(3):263-269.

5018266     Lijinsky, W.; Schmaehl, D. (1978) Carcinogenicity of N-nitroso derivatives of N-
            methylcarbamate insecticides in rats. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2(3/4):413-
            419.

5018267     Quarles, J.M.; Sega, M.W.; Schenley, C.K.; Lijinsky, W. (1979) Transformation of hamster
            fetal cells by nitrosated pesticides in a transplacental assay. Cancer Research 39(11):4525-
            4533.

40065500   Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1987) Toxicology Data Submitted in Support
            of Temik Brand 15 G Aldicarb Pesticide. Compilation of 2 studies.

40065501   Trutter, J. (1987) Aldicarb Foodborne Residue Toxicity Study in Monkeys-Watermelon:
            Laboratory Project Identification: HLA 400-720. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton
            Laboratories America, Inc. 95 p.

40065502   Trutter, J. (1987) Aldicarb Foodborne Residue Toxicity in Monkeys-Bananas: Laboratory
            Project Identification: HLA 400-720. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories
            America, Inc. 92 p.

40166600   Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1987) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support
            of Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

40166601   Hamada, N. (1987) Two-week Dose Range-finding Oral Toxicity Study in Beagle Dogs with
            Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project ID: 400-717. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton
            Laboratories America, Inc. 94 p.

40216900   Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1987) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in
            Support  of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 3 studies.

40216901   Pacenka, S.; Porter, K.; Jones, R.; et al. (1987) Changing Aldicarb Residue Levels in Soil and
            Groundwater, Eastern Long Island, New York: 866 ly. Unpublished  study prepared by
            Cornell Univ., Center for Environmental Research. 32 p.

40216902   Jones, R.; Marquardt, T. (1987) Monitoring of Aldicarb Residues in  Long Island, New York
            Potable Wells:  8660y; 1234g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural
            Products Co., Inc. 18 p.

40216903   Jones, R. (1987) The Aldicarb Experience: Results of Monitoring and Research Programs:
            1309g; 8662y. Unpublished compilation prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products
            Co., Inc. 48 p.

40232600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1987)  Submission of Residue Data for Aldicarb in/on Foods in
            Grocery Markets. Transmittal of 1 study.

40232601   Petersen, B.; Gregorio, C. (1987) Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis: Interim Report.
            Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc.  429 p.

40390700   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1987)  Submission of Data in Response to Aldicarb Special Review.
            Transmittal of 1 study.
                                       Page 146 of 191

-------
40390701   Anonymous (1987) Aldicarb National Food Survey (Supplemental Data for Aldicarb Acute
            Dietary Exposure Analysis Interim Report). Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 143 p.

40493300   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of Temik
            Aldicarb. Transmittal of 23 studies.

40493301   Jones, R.  (1988) Summary of Aldicarb Research and Monitoring Update. Unpublished study
            prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 8 p.

40493302   Jones, R.  (1987) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in a
            Massachusetts Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 34 p.

40493303   Jones, R.  (1987) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 34 p.

40493304   Jones, R.  (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for
            Winter Application to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 85 p.

40493305   Jones, R.  (1987) Volusia County Fernery Data Tables. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 7 p.

40493306   Jones, R.  (1987) Florida Shallow Monitoring Wells Data Tables. Unpublished study prepared
            by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 35 p.

40493307   Jones, R.; Hornsby, A.; Rao, P.; et al. (1987) Movement and degradation of aldicarb residues
            in the saturated zone  under citrus groves on the florida ridge. Journal of Contaminant
            Hydrology 1(1987): 265-285.

40493308   Jones, R.  (1987) Central California studies on the degradation and movement of aldicarb
            residues. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology l(1987):287-298.

40493309   Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.;  Jones, R.; et al. (1987) Laboratory studies on mechanisms for the
            degradation of aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone. Environmental Toxicology
            and Chemistry 6:377-394.

40493310   Jones, R.; Estes, T. (1987) Modeling unsaturated zone movement of aldicarb residues from
            applications to potatoes in eastern canada. Water Pollution Resource Journal of Canada
            22(1):99-106.

40493311   Jones, R.  (1987) Aldicarb environmental fate studies conducted in the western united states.
            P. 105-108 in Fate of Pesticides in Environment by J. Bigger and J.  Seiber, Publication 3320.

40493312   Jones, R.; Kirkland, S.; Chancey, E. (1987) Measurement of the environmental fate of
            aldicarb residues in a nebraska sand hills soil. Applied Agricultural Research 2(3): 177-182.

40493313   Jones, R.; Marquardt, T. (1987) Monitoring of aldicarb residues in long island,  new york
            potable wells. Archives of Environemental Contaminant and Toxicology 16:643-647.

40493314   Wyman, J.; Jones, R.; Medina, J.; et al. (1987) Environmental fate studies of aldicarb and
            aldoxycarb applications to Wisconsin potatoes. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2:61-72.

40493315   Pacenka,  S.; Porter, K.; Jones, R.; et al. (1987) Changing aldicarb residue levels in soil and
            groundwater, eastern Long Island, New York. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2:73-91.
                                       Page 147 of 191

-------
40493316   Carsel, R.;Parrish, R.; Jones, R.; etal. (19) Characterizing the Uncertainty of Pesticide
            Leaching in Agricultural Soils. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in
            cooperation with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 28 p.

40493317   Carsel, R.; Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; et al. (19) A Simulation Procedure for Groundwater Quality
            Assessments of Pesticides. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in
            cooperation with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and University of Wisconsin. 28 p.

40493319   Jones, R. (1987) The Aldicarb Experience: 1. Conduct and Impact of Monitoring and
            Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 24 p.

40493322   Jones, R.; Hornsby, A.; Rao, P. (1987) Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb Residues in
            Florida Citrus Soils. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation
            with University of Florida. 30 p.

40493323   Carsel, R.; Jones, R. (19) Use of Soil and Meterologic Data Bases for Application of
            Unsaturated Zone Models for Evaluating Pesticide Transport and Transformation.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with U.S.
            Environmental Protection Agency. 26 p.

40521600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Residue Summary Data to Support Data
            Regarding Aldicarb Import Tolerances. Transmittal of 1 study.

40521601   Gunderson, E. (1987) Summary of FY 87 Field Assignment "Pesticides in Imported Fresh
            Bananas". Unpublished study prepared by Food and Drug Administration. 9 p.

40542500   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support the Registration of Temik
            (Aldicarb Pesticide): Dissipation Studies. Transmittal of 1 study.

40542501   Bostian,  A.; Jones, R. (1988)  Temik Brand Aidicarb Pesticide: Limited Drinking Water Well
            Survey. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 54 p.

40551800   Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1988) Submission of Data in Support of Aldicarb Residue
            Tolerances. Transmittal of 1 study.

40551801   Petersen, B.; Gregorio, C. (1988) Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis: Final Report.
            Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 1972 p.

40607500   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Toxicological Data to Support the Continued
            Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Alidicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 studies.

40607501   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Executive Summary: Application of Temik Brand 15G
            Aldicarb to Three Major Crops: A Terrestrial Vertebrate Field Study and the Supplemental
            Report: Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Granule Incorporation Study. Unpublished
            study. 14 p.

40607502   Fletcher, D. (1988) Application of Temik Brand 15G  Aldicarb to Three Major Crops: A
            Terrestrial Verbebrate Field Study: BLAL Study No.  87 FV 3. Unpublished study prepared by
            Bio-Life Associates, Ltd. 536 p.

40607503   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Granule Incorporation
            Study. Unpublished study. 71 p.

40607504   Spencer, D. (1985) A Review of the Research Conducted on the Toxicity and Potential
            Hazard of Granular Formulations of Aldicarb (TEMIK) to Bird Life. Unpublished study. 34 p.
                                      Page 148 of 191

-------
40636500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Fate Data to Support the
            Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

40636501    Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for
            Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 89 p.

40636502    Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 36 p.

40645600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission Environmental Data in Support of Temik Brand
            15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

40645601    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues  Second Quarter Wisconsin
            Sampling. Unpublished study. 33 p.

40676700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Residue Data (Market Basket Survey) submitted To Support
            Aldicarb Registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

40676701    Peterson, B. (1988) Summary of the Review of the Aldicarb National Food Survey.
            Unpublished compilation prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 51 p.

40677300    US EPA (1981) EPA Compiled Documents Received from the PM for Addition to the
            Carbaryl Registration Standard. Transmittal of 2 studies.

40677302    Dorough, H. (1973) Metabolism of Carbamate Insecticides: Report No. EPA-650/1-74-002.
            Unpubllished study prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Entomology. Available from
            NTIS:PB-231596. 255 p.

40685700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support the Registration of Temik
            Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Data. Transmittal of 1  study.

40685701    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues  Second Quarter Wisconsin
            Sampling (Second Batch). Unpublished study. 12 p.

40695900    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Toxicity Data submitted To Support Aldicarb Registration.
            Transmittal of 1 study.

40695901    Hamada, N. (1988) One-year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study in Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb
            Technical: Project ID. 400-706. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories
            America, Inc. 617 p.

40815800    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Residue Data to Support the
            Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal  of 1 study.

40815801    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues: Third Quarter Wisconsin
            Sampling. Unpublished study. 44 p.

40816600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik
            (Granular Aldicarb): Environmental Fate and Residue Chemistry Data. Transmittal of 12
            studies.

40816601    Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 51 p.
                                      Page 149 of 191

-------
40816602    Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for
            Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 99 p.

40816603    Jones, R. (1988) Field Measurements of Water Samples in Volusia County Ferney: Aldicarb.
            Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 7 p.

40816604    Jones, R. (1988) Florida Shallow Monitoring Wells (Data Tables): Aldicarb. Unpublished
            study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 37 p.

40816605    Ou, L.; Rao, P.; Edvardsson, K.; et al. (1987) Aldicarb Degradation in Sandy Soils from
            Different Depths. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 14 p.

40816607    Carsel, R.; Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; et al. (1987) A Simulation Procedure for Groundwater
            Quality Assessments of Pesticides: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc
            Ag Co. 16 p.

40816608    Jones, R.; Rao, P.  (1988) Reflections on Validation and Applications of Unsaturated Zone
            Models: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. lip.

40816609    Jones, R.; Gibb, J.; Hank, R. (1988) Review of Unsaturated Zone Laeching Models from a
            User's Perspective: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 14 p.

40816610    Jones, R. (1988) The Aldicarb Experience: 1. Conduct and Impact of Monitoring and
            Research Programs.  Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 23 p.

40816611    Jones, R. (1988) The Aldicarb Experience: 2. Results of Monitoring and Research Programs.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag  Co. 50 p.

40816612    Jones, R. (1988) Pesticides in Groundwater: Conduct of Field Research Studies: Aldicarb.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag  Co. 35 p.

40884600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik:
            Residue Chemistry Data. Transmittal of 1 study.

40884601    Romine, R. (1988) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldicarb Residues in Soybean Products:
            Project ID; 803R10; File No. 40429. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.,
            and Texas A&M University. 74 p.

40925800    U.S. EPA (1984) Standardized Transmittal Document for PDMS Entry of OPP
            Administrative Records: Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 document.

40925801    U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency (1984) GS140:  Aldicarb: Registration Standard.
            Unpublished study. 1775 p.

40987300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Degradation and Movement Data to Support the
            Registration for Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 studies.

40987301    Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for
            Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 109 p.

40987302    Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 53 p.

40987303    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues: Summary of Potable Well
            Monitoring Data for 1988. Unpublished study. 4 p.
                                      Page 150 of 191

-------
40987304    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Fourth Quarter Wisconsin
            Second Sampling. Unpublished study, lip.

41004500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Toxicity Data to Support the Continued
            Registration of Temik Granular Pesticide Products. Transmittal of 1 study.

41004501    Neeper-Bradley, T.; Tyl, R. (1988) Developmental Toxicity Evaluation of Aldicarb
            Administered by Gavage to CD (Sprague-Dawley) Rats: Laboratory Project ID BRRC 51-
            551: RPAC 40293. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Bushy Run Research
            Center. 351 p.

41020300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Environmental Data to Support the Registration
            Standard for Temik Brand 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41020301    Jones, R. (1989) Rhone-Poulenc Potable Well Survey Program Conducted During 1987:
            Additional Site Specific Data. Unpublished compilation. 335 p.

41020302    Jones, R. (1989) Buffer Zone Criteria for United States Soils. Unpublished compilation
            prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 308 p.

41023000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Residue Data to Support the Temik Brand 15G
            Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41023001    Romine, R. (1988) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide...Residues in Rotational Crops: Project
            No. 803R10: 40455. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation
            with Analytical Development Corp. 278 p.

41054600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of Temik. Transmittal
            of 1 study.

41054601    IIT Research Institute (1989) Immunotoxicology Study of Aldicarb in Mice: Phase II: Final
            Report: IITRI Project No. L08181. Unpublished study. 254 p.

41075500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1989) Submission of Chemistry Data in Support of Temik
            Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 study.

41075501    Helfant, L. (1989) TEMIK brand Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry. Unpublished study
            prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 15 p.

41088600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Environmental Fate Data to Support the
            Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41088601    Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report:  Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for
            Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulence Ag Co. 27 p.

41088602    Jones, R. (1989) The Aldicarb Experience: 2. Results of Monitoring and Research Programs.
            Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 49 p.

41139500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Aldicarb Residue Data. Transmittal of 2
            studies.

41139501    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Second Quarter 1989
            Wisconsin First Sampling. Unpublished study. 41 p.

4113 9502    Jones, R. (1989) Progess Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study. 54 p.
                                      Page 151 of 191

-------
41189600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Residue Data in Support of Temik brand 15G
            Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal

41189601    Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
            Company. 55 p.

41216000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Fate Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G
            Aldicarb Pesticide EPA Reg No. 264-330 and 264426. Transmittal of 1 study.

41216001    Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 19 p.

41255500    U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Submission of Toxicity Data. Transmittal of 1 study.

41255501    U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Biological Opinion on Selected Pesticides.
            Unpublished study. 891 p.

41290700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Data on Residues from Potable Wells in
            Wisconsin. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41290701    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues: Third Quarter 1989 Wisconsin
            Second Sampling. 17 p.

41290702    Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an
            Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 59 p.

41363700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data in Support of Temik 15G and 10G
            Aldicarb Pesticides Data Call-in: Aldicarb National Food Survey Interim Report. Transmittal
            of 1 study.

41363701    Romine, R. (1990) First Interim Report for the Aldicarb Data Callin: Temik Residues in
            National Food Survey Samples. Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.
            29 p.

41377100    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Submission of Biological Opinion Data for Selected
            Pesticides. Transmittal of 1 study.

41377101    U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Biological Opinion Log on Selected Pesticides.
            Unpublished study. 677 p.

41378500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of Temik
            Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41378501    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Fourth Quarter 1989 Wisconsin
            First Sampling. Unpublished study. 16 p.

41378502    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Fourth Quarter 1989 Wisconsin
            Second Sampling. Unpublished study.  12 p.

41392900    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data in Response to the Aldicarb Data
            Call-in. Transmittal of 1 study.
                                      Page 152 of 191

-------
41392901    Romine, R. (1990) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Reanalysis of ANFS Samples: Lab
            Project Number: EC-89-062: 40720. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.
            52 p.

41482200    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Aldicarb
            Pesticide (Granular): Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

41482201    Jones, R. (1990) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for
            Winter Application to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Phone-Poulenc Ag Co.  129 p.

41509200    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data to Support the Continued
            Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41509201    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Aldicarb Residue Data from Potato Producing Companies.
            Unpublished study. 19 p.

41554200    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Summary Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G
            Granular Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41554201    Florida Department of Agriculture (1990) Aldicarb Citrus Monitoring Data. Unpublished
            study. 7 p.

41575800    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Registration of TEMIK Brand
            15G Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1  study.

41575801    Trama, T. (1990) Letter Sent to Letter sent to J. Craig dated July 19, 1990: Temik residue
            analyses by season and variety. 5 p.

41608700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G
            Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

41608701    Hazleton Laboratories. (1990) Aldicarb Interim Cholinesterase Data and Incidence Summary:
            5 Week Dog (2 Week Evaluation): Lab Project Number: HLA 656162. Unpublished study. 14
            P-

41611100    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G
            Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

41611101    Hazleton Laboratories. (1990) Aldicarb Interim Cholinesterase Data and Incidence Summary:
            5 Week Dog (2 Week Evaluation). Unpublished study. 14 p.

41656800    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data to  Support the Registration of
            Temik. Transmittal of  1 Study.

41656801    Charles, J. (1990) Interim Data for Aldicarb 5 Week Dog Cholinesterase Evaluations: Lab
            Project Number: HLA/656162. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories Inc. 15
            P-

41659700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support the Application for
            Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Groundwater Monitoring Studies.
            Transmittal of 3 studies.

41659701    Davis, W. (1990) Letter Sent to Letter sent to B. Kapner dated Oct 12, 1990: Ground water
            monitoring study: TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. 3 p.
                                      Page 153 of 191

-------
41659702   Rourke, R.; Jones, R. (1990) Potable Well Monitoring for Aldicarb: Unpublished study
            prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 18 p.

41659703   Jones, R. (1990) Rhone-Poulenc and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Well
            Monitoring for Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 27 p.

41661300   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data to Support the Registration of
            Temik. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

41661301   Ivett, J. (1990) Single Acute Exposure Dose Selection Study on Aldicarb: Lab Project
            Number: 12010/0/459/PO. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America,
            Inc. 15 p.

41661302   Ivett, J. (1990) Mutagenicity Test on Aldicarb Technical in the Mouse Bone Marrow
            Cytogenetic Assay: Lab Project Number: 12010/ 0/451.  Unpublished study prepared by
            Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 57 p.

41662500   Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data to Support the Registration of the
            Temik Brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41662501   Ayers, A.; Jones, R. (1990) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Limited Aldicarb Drinking
            Water Well Survey-II. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 335 p.

41668300   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik Brand
            Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

41668301   Craig, J.  (1990) Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services Sampling of Citrus for
            Residues of Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 7 p.

41708600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand Aldicarb
            Registration:  Avian Toxicology Response Studies. Transmittal of 4 studies.

41708601   Hobson,  J.  (1990) Aldicarb: Toxicity to Avian Species: A Position Statement. Unpublished
            study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 22 p.

41708602   Hobson,  J.; Fish, J. (1990) Aldicarb: Response to the Review by the Ecological Effects
            Branch of the 1987 Temik Brand Aldicarb Granular Incorporation Study Conducted by J.
            Fish. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 16 p.

41708603   Hobson, J.  (1990) Aldicarb: Response to the Review by  the Ecological Effects Branch of the
            1987 Temik Terrestrial Vertebrate Field Study. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 20 p.

41708604   Kendall,  R. (1990) Behavior, Survivability and Biochemical Response of Wild Mourning
            Doves (Zenaida macroura) Dosed with Aldicarb: Final Research Report Phase I: Lab Project
            Number: 08035. Unpublished study prepared by ClemsonUniv., Institute of Wildlife and
            Environ. Toxicology. 29 p.

41739900   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Exposure  Data In Support of Temik Brand
            Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41739901   Jones, P. (1990) Worker Exposure to Dichoromethane While Simulating The Loading of
            Temik Brand 15G for Application to Citrus: Lab Project Number: EF-89-27: 91C-4708.
            Unpublished  study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 206 p.
                                      Page 154 of 191

-------
41749400   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Study In Support of Temik Brand
            Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41749401   Chancey, E. (1990) Wisconsin Aldicarb Potable Well Sampling: Unpublished study prepared
            by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 27 p.

41844700   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Progress Report June 1989 in Response to Data
            Call-In for Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41844701   Harrison, S. (1991) Aldicarb Data Call-In Progress Report. Unpublished study prepared by
            Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 17 p.

41845700   Mycogen Corp. (1991) Submission of efficacy data to support the registration of M-One Plus
            Bioinsecticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41845701   Sorenson, K.; Boylan-Pett, W. (1990) Efficacy data on M-One Plus Bioinsecticide.
            Unpublished study prepared by North Carolina Ag. Extension, Michigan State Univ. and
            Univ. of Wisconsin. 104 p.

41865800   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik Brand
            Aldicarb: Metabolism Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

41865801   Tyl, R.; Marr, M.; Myers, C. (1991) Preliminary Evaluation of Aldicarb Excretion in the Milk
            of Lactating CD Rats Exposed to Aldicarb in the Diet: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
            60C/4752. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 130 p.

41919900   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1991) Submission of toxicity data in support of reregistration
            of aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

41919901   Hamada, N. (1991) Subchronic Toxicity Study in Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project
            Number: 656-162. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 320 p.

41956100   Rhone-Poulenc (1991) Submission of toxicity data in support of reregistration of Aldicarb
            technical. Transmittal of 1 study.

41956101   Hamada, N. (1991) Subchronic Toxicity Study in Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project
            Number: 656-162. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 320 p.

41971800   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of product benefits data in support of registration
            of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

41971801   Rhone-Poulenc Co. (1991) The Benefits to Agriculture of Pesticide Products Containing
            Aldicarb. Unpublished study. 282 p.

42002100   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Incident Report on Aldicarb for Section 6(a)(2)
            Requirements. Transmittal of 1 study.

42002101   Davis, W. (1991) Section 6(a)(2) Reporting on Aldicarb AOverexposure Incident.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 5 p.

42004300   FMC Corp. (1991) Submission of Toxicological data to support the registration of AMMO
            Insecticides (Cypermethrin). Transmittal of 1 study.

42004301   Palmieri, M. (1991) Aquatic Mesocosm Study of Pesticide Products Containing the Active
            Ingredient Cypermethrin: Progress Report 13: Lab Project Number A89-2847. Unpublished
            study prepared by Wildlife International, Ltd. and FMC Corp. 5 p.
                                       Page 155 of 191

-------
42004400   Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1991) Submission of residue data to support the registration of
            Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 studies.

42004401   Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: In-Orchard Variation of the Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb
            Residues in Oranges: Lab Project Number: EC-91-141. Unpublished study prepared by
            Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 54 p.

42004402   Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: Comparison of GLC and HPLC Methods for Determining Residues
            of Aldicarb and It's Metabolites in Potatoes: Lab Project Number: EC-90-094. Unpublished
            study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 55 p.

42004403   Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: Effects of Microwave Cooking on Residues of Aldicarb and It's
            Metabolites in Potatoes: Lab Project Number EC-90-094. Unpublished study prepared by
            Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 71 p.

42016900   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of residue data in support of registration of Temik
            brand aldicarb pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42016901   Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: In-Orchard Variartion of the Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb
            Residues in Oranges and Grapefruit and Stability of These Residues in Commercial Storage:
            Lab Project Number: EC-90-093. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 95
            P-

42017400   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of environmental fate data in support of
            registration of Temik. Transmittal of 1 study.

42017401   Stratton, G. (1986) Metabolism of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in
            Potato Plants and in Plant Callus Tissue Cultures of Potato Tuber and Citron Fruit.
            Unpublished study prepared by University of Florida. 280 p.

42040600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of residue data to support the registration standard
            for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42040601   Tew, E. (1991) Aldicarb: Magnitude of the Residues in Bananas Treated with Temik 15G:
            Lab Project Number: EC-90-123. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 62
            P-

42073400   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Section 6(a)(2) FIFRA
            Requirements: Chronic Toxicity Study of Aldicarb on Rat. Transmittal of 1 study.

42073401   Davis, W. (1991) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated October 29,  1991: Concerning a chronic rat
            study being conducted on Aldicarb. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 1 p.

42073600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1991) Submission of metabolism data to support the registration
            standard for Aldicarb in Temik 15G. Transmittal of 1 study.

42073601   Hunt, T. (1991) Determination of Rate of Degradation of Aldicarb Carbamate Residues in
            Potatoes Stored under Simulated Commercial Conditions: Lab Project Number: EC-89-085:
            40986. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Company. 39 p.

42121500   Rhone-Poulenc Ag. (1991) Submission of Section 6(a)(2) Data in Response to Request for
            Additional Factual Information Regarding Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Unreasonable
            Adverse Effects: Groundwater Monitoring Study. Transmittal of 1 study.
                                      Page 156 of 191

-------
42121501    Chancy, E. (1991) Rhone-Poulenc Analyses of Water Sample from Wisconsin Wells for the
            Period August to October 1991. Unpublished study prepared Rhone-Poulenc Ag. 21 p.

42148400    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand Aldicarb
            Pesticide Registration: Additional Factual Toxicology Information Regarding Unreasonable
            Adverse Effects Under Section 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42148401    Lemen, J. (1991) Two-Generation Reproduction Study in Rats with Aldicarb: Lab Project
            Number: 656-157. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc.  1946 p.

42154300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik Brand
            Aldicarb: Toxicology (Exposure) Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

42154301    Peterson, H.; McPheeters, B.; et al. (1991) Preliminary Results of Rhone-Poulenc's Review of
            Goldman et al. "Aldicarb Food Poisoning in California 1985-1988: Toxicity Estimates for
            Humans" 45 Archives of Environmental Health 141 (1990). Unpublished study prepared by
            Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 64 p.

42180600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Company (1991) Submission of information in pursuant of Section
            6(a)(2) of FIFRA reporting a potential overexposure of a 14 month old girl to a cookie treated
            with Temik and an unknown pelleted rodenticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42180601    Davis, W. (1991) Letter Sent to S. Haddad, December 10, 1991: (Letter concerning exposure
            of a child to Temik and an unknown rodenticide). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 1 p.

42191500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik
            (Aldicarb): Toxicology Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

42191501    Hamada, N.; Thakur, A. (1991) One-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study in Dogs with Aldicarb
            Technical:  Addendum to Final Report: Lab Project Number:  400-706. Unpublished study
            prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 13 p.

42226200    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand 15G (Aldicarb
            Pesticide) Registration for Label Amendments: Field Crop Accumulation Study. Transmittal
            of 1 study.

42226201    Hunt, T. (1992) Field Accumulation Study on Rotational Crops Temik/Plant-Back Residue
            Program: Lab Project Number: EC/R-89-002. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc
            Ag Co.; Stewart Agricultural Research, Inc.; Chemalysis Lab.; et al. 628 p.

42243300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of additional adverse effects data and incident
            reports concerning Temik (Aldicarb) under FIFRA 6(a)(2) status. Transmittal of 1 study.

42243301    W. Davis (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated February 19, 1992: Concerning deaths of an
            ocelot, two oppossums, and four raccoons at Atascosa Wildlife Refuge in Rio Hondo, Texas.
            Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 1 p.

42243400    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support FIFRA 6(A)(2) Requirements
            for Temik Brand Aldicarb Adverse Effects. Transmittal of 1 study.

42243401    Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated February 24, 1992: Concerning Florida
            drinking potable water monitoring aldicarb. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 3 p.

42247200    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand Aldicarb
            Registration: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.
                                      Page 157 of 191

-------
42247201    Tew,E. (1992) Determination of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Treated with Temik 15G
            Under Furrow and Under Overhead Irrigation Practices in the Pacific Northwest: Final
            Report: Lab Project Number: EC-90-115: 41095. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 132 p.

42275700    Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of toxicity data in support of registration of Temik
            (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

42275701    Lemen, J. (1992) Pilot Reproduction Study in Rats with Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 656-
            156. Unpublished study prepared by HazletonLabs., America, Inc. 425 p.

42293700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue data in support of the registration of
            Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42293701    Gustafson, D. (1992) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in Wisconsin: Results for
            all Wells Sampled in 1991: Final Summary Report: Lab Project Number: 41194. Unpublished
            study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 62 p.

42305800    Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1992) Submission of Data To  Support Aldicarb Registration
            Standard: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

42305801    Romine, R. (1989) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldicarb Residues in Dried Potato
            Products: Lab Project Number: 803R10: 40479. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag., Co. 72 p.

42307500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support FIFRA 6(a)(2) Requirements
            for Aldicarb: Residue in drinking water. Transmittal of 1 study.

42307501    Davis, W. (1992) Letter  Sent to S. Haddad dated April 28, 1992: (Concerning aldicarb,
            aldicarb sulfoxide and sulfone residues in a drinking water well). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc
            Ag Co. 2 p.

42316000    Univ. of Georgia (1992) Submission of an incident report involving Furadan 4-F: Data
            submitted under FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42316001    Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy report on three red-tailed hawks found near Edgefield,
            South Carolina. Prepared by Univ. of Ga., College of Veterinary Med. 2 p.

42316100    Univ. of Georgia (1992) Submission of an incident report involving Temik in the wildlife kill
            of a gray fox. Data submitted under FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42316101    Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy Report on a Gray Fox Found near Edgefield, South
            Carolina. Unpublished study prepared by Univ. of Georgia, College of Veterinary Med. 2 p.

42316200    Univ. of Georgia (1992) Submission of an incident report involving Temik in a wildlife kill of
            raccoons. Data submitted under FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42316201    Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy Record on a Raccoon Found near Edgefield, South
            Carolina. Unpublished study prepared by Univ. of Ga.,  College of Veterinary Med. 2 p.

42316500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1992) Submission of incident  reports under FIFRA 6(a)(2) Status
            (Adverse effects and incident report) to support the reregistration of Temik (Aldicarb)
            pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42316501    Davis, W. (1992) Letter  Sent to S. Haddad dated May 11, 1992: Death of dogs and cats in two
            separate incidents related to Temik (Aldicarb). 2 p.
                                       Page 158 of 191

-------
42372300   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. (1992) Submission of Literature Review in Support of Registration
            for Temik brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42372301   Cole, P.; Pastides, H.; Rothman, K. (1992) The Epidemiologh of Aldicarb Exposure in
            Humans: A Critique of the Literature with emphasis on its Application to Risk Assessment: .
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 26 p.

42373000   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of safety data in support of the registration
            standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42373001   Wyld, P.; Watson, C.; Nimmo, W.; et al. (1992) A Safety and Tolerability Study of Aldicarb
            at Various Dose Levels in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers: Lab Project Number:
            003237. Unpublished study prepared by Inveresk Clinical Research. 372 p.

42436500   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue analytical methods data in support of
            TEMIK brand Aldicarb pesticide registration.

42436501   VerHey, M. (1992) Testing of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfone and Aldicarb Sulfoxide through
            Protocol E: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 1181.  Unpublished study prepared by
            Colorado Analytical Research & Development Corp.  35 p.

42436600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Supplemental submission of residue data in support of the data
            call-in for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 6 studies.

42436601   Honeycutt, R.; Andrawes, N. (1992) Summary Report on the Nature of Residues of carbon
            14-Aldicarb in Plants: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 92-102. Unpublished study
            prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 70 p.

42436602   Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism and Associated Residues of Temik (2-methyl-
            2-(methylthio) propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK) in Sugar Beet Plants:
            Lab Project Number: 11 IB 19: 12694. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 52 p.

42436603   Andrawes, N. (1992) The Metabolism and Terminal Residues of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in
            Peanut Plants under Field Conditions: Lab Project Number: 111A12: 17613. Unpublished
            study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 47 p.

42436604   Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Degradation of 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde
            O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK) in Potato Foliage: Reformatted: Lab Project Number:
            111B19: 10495. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 44 p.

42436605   Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism of 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-
            (methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK Aldicarb Pesticide) in Potato Plants: Reformatted.
            Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 60 p.

42436606   Andrawes, N.; Romine, R.; Bagley, W.  (1992) Metabolism and Residues of TEMIK Aldicarb
            Pesticide in Cotton Foliage and Seed under Field Conditions: Reformatted. Unpublished study
            prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 82 p.

42446500   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of toxicity data to support the registration standard
            for Temik (aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

42446501   Kendall, R. (1992) Behavior, Survivability and Biochemical Response of Wild Northern
            Bobwhites (Colinus virginianus) Dosed with Temik: Lab Project Number: 08034.
            Unpublished study prepared by ClemsonUniv., Inst. of Wildlife and Environ. Tox. 34 p.
                                      Page 159 of 191

-------
42456000   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of fate data in support data in support of FIFRA
            6(a)(2) requirements of Temik brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42456001   Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Sepehr Haddad dated August 10, 1992 concerning residues of
            aldicarb sulfone and aldicarb sulfoxide in two Florida wells. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 2 p.

42456100   Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of fate data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for
            Temik Brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42456101   Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated August 28, 1992
            concerning Aldicarb in a well in Maine. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 1 p.

42456200   Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of fate data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for
            Temik brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42456201   Gustafson, D. (1992) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States:
            Results for Samples Analyzed 1Q, 1992 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): Lab Project
            Number: 41206: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 55 p.

42467300   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue chemistry data to support Aldicarb
            reregistration. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42467301   Tew, E. (1992) Aldicarb: Stability of Residue on Frozen Potato Processed Fractions: Final
            Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-201. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
            Co. 62 p.

42467302   Tew, E. (1992) Aldicarb: Stability of Residues on Frozen Soybean Processed Fractions: Final
            Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-200. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
            Co. 54 p.

42487600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue survey data to support registration of
            TEMIK products. Transmittal of 1 study.

42487601   Rogers, C. (1992) Aldicarb Survey 1991: Texas. Unpublished study prepared by Texas Water
            Commission. 9 p.

42498200   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submittal of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
            Aldicarb Data Call-in. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42498201   Das, Y. (1990) Photodegradation of (S-Methyl-carbon 14) Aldicarb in Aqueous Solution
            Buffered atpH  5 under Artificial Sunlight: Lab  Project Number:  90021. Unpublished study
            prepared by Innovative Scientific  Services, Inc. 91  p.

42498202   Dykes, J. (1990) Soil Adsorption/Desorption with Carbon 14Aldicarb: Lab Project Number:
            37352. Unpublished study prepared by Analytical Bio-Chemistry Laboratories, Inc. 326 p.

42509400   Rhone Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submittal of chronic oncogenicity data on Aldicarb in support
            of FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42509401   Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated September 29,  1992
            Regarding the Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Feeding Study in Rats. Prepared by Rhone
            Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p.

42515700   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of TEMIK residue chemistry data under FIFRA
            6(a)(2) to support TEMIK products registration. Transmittal of 1 study.
                                      Page 160 of 191

-------
42515701    Davis, W. (1992) Letter sent to S. Haddad dated Oct. 9, 1992: TEMIK brand Aldicard
            pesticide residues in Florida drinking water wells. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p.

42523400    Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1992) Submission of product chemistry data to support a
            formulation amendment for Temik (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

42523401    Crownover, R. (1992) Aldicarb Solution, Technical Product Identity and Composition...: Lab
            Project Number: AC-92-009: 41264. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. 13
            P-

42561200    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. (1992) Submission of residue survey in support of registration for
            Aldicarb (Temik). Transmittal of 4 studies.

42561201    Harrison, S.; Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1992) Aldicarb Orange Monitoring Survey Outline.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. and Technical Assessment Systems
            Inc. 25 p.

42561202    Brown, E. (1992) Procedures for Florida Orange  Processing. Unpublished study prepared by
            Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. 6 p.

42561203    Tomerlin, J.; Petersen, B. (1992) Summary of Aldicarb Monitoring in Florida as of October
            23, 1992. Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 17 p.

42561204    Benell, N. (1991) Monitoring Data for Aldicarb in Grapefruit and Oranges. Unpublished
            study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 48 p.

42643900    Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental data in support of the registration for
            Temik 15G Aldicarb pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42643901    Spare, W. (1993) Soil Photolysis of Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 1515. Unpublished study
            prepared by Agrisearch Inc. 175 p.

42659500    Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of residue chemistry data concerning Temik under
            FIFRA 6(A)2. Transmittal of 1 study.

42659501    Davis, W. (1993) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated  on Feb. 2, 1993: Preliminary results from
            residue trial studies concerning Temik. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 4 p.

42687100    Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental fate data in support of the registration of
            TEMIK 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticides. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42687101    Gustafson, D. (1993) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States:
            Results for Samples Analyzed 2Q, 1992 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): (Quarterly Phase
            Report): Lab Project Number: 41267: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 81 p.

42687102    Gustafson, D. (1993) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States:
            Results for Samples Analyzed 3Q, 1992 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): (Quarterly Phase
            Report): Lab Project Number: 41308: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 140 p.

42722300    Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of residue data in support of the registration of Temik
            Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42722301    Tew, E. (1993) Temik: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Sweet Potatoes: Lab Project
            Number: USA92T02: 41382. Unpublished study  prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag  Co. 164 p.
                                      Page 161  of 191

-------
42725800    Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of FIFRA
            6(a)(2) requirements for TEMIK brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

42725801    Davis, W. (1993) Letter sent to S. Haddad dated March 23, 1993 reporting results from
            sampling of Florida drinking water wells from the Dept. of Environmental Regulation.
            Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 5 p.

42749600    Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of residue data in support of registration for Aldicarb
            Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42749601    Petersen, B. (1993) Estimation of Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Sweet Potatoes.
            Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 9 p.

42796000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1993) Submission of product chemistry data in support of the
            registration for Temik brand aldicarb pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42796001    McDaniel,  R.; Weiler,  D.; Young, K. (1987) Aldicarb Vapor Pressure Evaluation: Lab Project
            Number: 803P15: 40052. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc  Ag Co. 8 p.

42796002    McDaniel,  R.; Weiler,  D.; Young, K. (1987) Aldicarb: Design and Validation of High Flow
            Apparatus for Vapor Pressure Determinations: Lab Project Number: 40182: 8710020.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 20 p.

42797900    Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental fate data in support of the FIFRA 6(a)(2)
            requirements for aldicarb.  Transmittal of 1 study.

42797901    Davis, W. (1993) Letter sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated May 26, 1993: Aldicarb
            drinking water detection in Florida, Maine and Wisconsin. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 4 p.

42827800    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1993) Submission of residue data in support of the registration for
            TEMIK. Transmittal of 4 studies.

42827801    Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Processed Potatoes: Potato
            Fractions: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-211: 44121. Unpublished study prepared
            by Rhone-Poulenc Ag  Co. 229 p.

42827802    Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Determination of Variation in Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb
            Residues in Potatoes from Temik-Treated Fields: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-90-
            092: EC-90-117: 41207. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 618 p.

42827803    Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Grown from Seed
            Pieces Injected with Aldicarb Sulfoxide at 1.0 PPM: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-
            92-208: 41354. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 90 p.

42827804    Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Grown with Available
            Overhead Irrigation in 1992: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-180: 41395.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 283 p.

42935000    Rohm and Haas Company (1993) Submission of Toxicity Data, Residue Chemistry Data,
            Environmental Fate Data and Product Chemistry Data for Triazamate in Support of an
            Experimental Use Permit and Petition for Temporary Tolerance on Apples. Transmittal of 71
            Studies.
                                      Page 162 of 191

-------
42935042   Parkin, D. (1991) Comparison of IC-50 and T 1/2 of Aldicarb and RH-7988 on Human
            Plasma Cholinesterase: Lab Project Number: 89P-141: 89R-141. Unpublished study prepared
            by Rohm and Haas Company, Toxicology Department. 40 p.

43045400   Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of toxicology data in support of registration for
            TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

43045401   Trutter, J. (1993) Combined Chronic Toxicity and Oncogenicity Study in Rats with Aldicarb
            Technical: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 656/151: HWA/656/151. Unpublished study
            prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 3532 p.

43084100   Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in Support of Registration Standard
            for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

43084101   Byrd, J. (1994) A Nature of the Residue Study with (carbon 14)-Aldicarb in Laying Hens:
            Lab Project Number: 9285C: 819: EC-91-221. Unpublished study prepared by Southwest
            Bio-Labs, Inc. 348 p.

43110600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in Support of Registration of
            TEMIK brand Aldicarb Pesticide for Citrus. Transmittal of 1 study.

43110601   Tew, E.; Peterson, B.; Barraj, L.; et al. (1994) Aldicarb Fresh-Market Orange Monitoring
            Study: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-216. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. and Morse Labs, Inc. 154 p.

43138500   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2)
            requirements for TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

43138501   Davis, W. (1994) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated Feb. 17, 1994 concerning
            monitoring of wells in Florida for possible aldicarb residues. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
            Co.  9 p.

43143800   Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submission of ground water monitoring data in support of
            FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

43143801   Jones, R. (1994) Site Specific Information Related to Aldicarb Well Monitoring Conducted
            by Rhone-Poulenc AG Company. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 26
            P-

43154400   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in Support of Registration of Temik
            Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

43154401   Dean, P. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for
            Samples Analyzed 4Q, 1992 and 1Q, 1993 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): Lab Project
            Number: 44124: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.  169 p.

43193600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in support of registration for
            TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

43193601   Chancey, E. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results
            for Samples Submitted for Analysis April 1 through December 31, 1993 (Exclusive of Long
            Island, NY): Lab Project Number: 44306: EC/92/182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 175 p.

43277100   Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2)
            requirements for aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.
                                      Page 163  of 191

-------
43277101    Davis, W. (1994) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated June 21, 1994:
            (Concerning Aldicarb residues above the 10 ppb MCL found in well samples in Florida and
            Wisconsin). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 15 p.

43299000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Conditional
            Registration of TEMIK 15G. Transmittal of 6 Studies.

43299001    Fish, J. (1994) Comparison of Application Characteristics of Positive Displacement Granular
            Applicators and Gravity Flow Granular Applicators: Lab Project Number: 44303:
            USAATG9301. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Clayton Research Station. 78
            P-

43299002    Tew, E. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Resulting from
            Application Using Gravity Flow and Positive Displacement Application Equipment: Final
            Study Report: Lab Project Number: USA93T70: 44412: 93-001. Unpublished study prepared
            by Phone-Poulenc Ag Co. 3255 p.

43299003    Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analysis: Lab Project
            Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study prepared by Techniacl Assessment Systems,
            Inc. 56 p.

43299004    Rao, K. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Processed Potato Fractions:
            Addendum: Chain of Custody Records for Processed Samples: Lab Project Number: EC-92-
            211. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 10 p.

43299005    Rao, K. (1994) Determination of Variation in Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb Residues
            in Potatoes from Temik-Treated Fields: Addendum: Summary of Sample Storage Intervals:
            Lab Project Number: EC-90-092: EC-90-117. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc
            Ag Co. 6 p.

43299006    Rao, K. (1994) Aldicarb-Stability of Residues on Frozen Potato Processed Fractions:
            Addendum: Quantitative Data Tables & Example Chromatograms: Lab Project Number: EC-
            92-201. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 70 p.

43325400    DuPont Agricultural Products (1994) Submission of environmental fate data in support of
            registration standard for methomyl. Transmittal of 3 studies.

43325402    Smelt, J.; Dekker, A.; Leistra, M.; et al. (1983) Conversion of four carbamoyloximes in soil
            samples from above and below the soil water table. Pesticide Science 14:173-181.

43325403    Bromilow, R.; Briggs, G.; Williams, M.  et al. (1986) The role of ferrous ions in the rapid
            degradation of oxamyl, methomyl, and aldicarb in anaerobic soils. Pesticide Science 17:535-
            547.

43346700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of
            TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Registrations. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43346701    Jones, R. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for
            Samples Submitted for Analysis April 1  Through June 30, 1994: (Quarterly Phase Report):
            Lab Project Number: EC-92-182: 44462. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
            Co.  103 p.

43385000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue and exposure data in support of
            registration for TEMIK. Transmittal of 2 studies.
                                      Page 164 of 191

-------
43385001    Tew, E. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude and Distribution of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes From
            the Mid-Row Areas of 1993 Florida Test Plots Established with Positive Displacement
            Application (PDA) Equipment: Final Report: Lab Project Number: US94T02R: 44514.
            Unpublished study prepared by Morse Lab., Inc.  157 p.

43385002    Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses: Revised
            Report: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB/94/01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 56 p.

43442300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.  (1994) Submission of toxicity data in support of Data Call-in for
            Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 5 studies.

43442301    Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Study of the Potential Effects of
            Orally Administered Aldicarb, Technical Grade, on Behavior and Neuromorphology in Rats:
            Lab Project Number:  97235. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 712 p.

43442302    Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) ATime of Peak Behavioral Effects Study of a
            Single Oral Administration of Aldicarb, Technical Grade, in Rats: Lab Project Number:
            97236. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 278 p.

43442303    Robinson, K.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Benchmark-Dose Toxicity Study of Orally
            Administered Aldicarb, Technical Grade, in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97277. Unpublished
            study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 65 p.

43442305    Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Study of the Time Course of Cholinesterase
            Inhibition by Aldicarb Technical, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in the Rat: Lab
            Project Number: 97352. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 358 p.

43453800    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.  (1994) Submission of Residue Data in Support of Aldicarb
            Registration Standard. Transmission of 1 Study.

43453801    Jones, R. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring  for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for
            Samples Submitted for Analysis July 1 Through September 30, 1994: Lab Project Numbers:
            EC-92-182: 44559. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 100 p.

43575100    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.  (1995) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Aldicarb
            Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43575101    Tyl, R.; Marr, M.; Myers, C. (1995) Modified Dominant Lethal Evaluation of Aldicarb
            Administered in the Feed to CD (Sprague-Dawley) Rats: Final Report: Lab Project Numbers:
            65C-5880.  Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 323 p.

43591700    E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (1995) Submission of Pesticide Fate & Residues in the
            Environment and Exposure/Risk to Non-Target Organisms Data in Support of the Atrazine,
            Simazine, and Cyanazine Registration Standards. Transmittal of 13 Studies.

43591710    Georgia Agribusiness Council. (1995) What's in a number EPA needs to return to the basics:
            Well sampling by county. The Predicate, p. 1.

43599300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.  (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of Aldicarb
            Registration Standard. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

43599301    Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses: Lab Project
            Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study  prepared by TAS, Inc. 56 p.
                                      Page 165 of 191

-------
43599302   Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses: Revised
            Report: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc.
            56 p.

43599303   Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1995) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses. Unpublished
            study prepared by TAS, Inc. 18 p.

43608800   Monsanto Co. (1995) Submission of Residue in the Environment Data in Support of FIFRA
            6(a)(2) for Alachlor and Atrazine. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43608801   Weppelman, R. (1995) Letter sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated April 6, 1995
            transmitting a report from the Tennessee Dept. of Agriculture describing the results of their
            ground water monitoring program for 1994. Prepared by Monsanto, The Agricultural Group.
            7 p.

43617800   Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1995) Submission of Residues in the Environment and Hazard to Aquatic
            Organisms Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Diazinon. Transmittal of 9 Studies.

43617801   Ross, L. (1991) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: March and April, 1991:
            (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study
            prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 17 p.

43617802   Ross, L. (1992) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Summer 1991:
            (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study
            prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 15 p.

43617803   Ross, L. (1992) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Winter 1991-2:
            (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study
            prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 17 p.

43617804   Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Spring 1992: (Diazinon,
            Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by
            State of California,  Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 14 p.

43617805   Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Summer 1992:
            (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study
            prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 15 p.

43617806   Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Winter 1992-3:
            (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study
            prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 16 p.

43617808   Nordmark, C. (1994) Four River Monitoring Protocol: Revised: (Includes "Preliminary
            Results of the Four River Study, Sacramento River, Winter/Spring  1993-1994"). Unpublished
            study prepared by California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 13 p.

43623700   Rhone-Poulenc Ag  Co. (1995) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of
            the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43623701   Denny, J.; Jones, R. (1995) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States:
            Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis October 1 Through December 31, 1994: Lab
            Project Number: EC-92-182: 44683. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.
            60 p.

43628100   Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1995) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of
            FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Various Pesticides Registered to Ciba. Transmittal of 1 Study.
                                       Page 166 of 191

-------
43628101    Shahane, A. (1994) Pesticide Detections in Surface Waters of Florida. Unpublished study
            prepared by Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 9 p.

43633400    E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (1995) Submission of Toxicology and Residue Data in
            Support of the Special Review for Atrazine, Simazine and Cyanazine. Transmittal of 5
            Studies.

43633401    Heindel, I; Chapin, R.; Gulati, D. et al. (1993) Assessment of the reproductive and
            developmental toxicity of pesticide/fertilizer mixtures based on confirmed pesticide
            contamination in California and Iowa groundwater. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology
            22:605-621.

43649200    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Pesticide Misuse and Toxicity Data in Support
            of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Temik (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 Study.

43649201    Davis, W. (1995) Letter Sent to D. Edwards dated May 13, 1995: TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb
            pesticide:  (three dog poisoning incidents and summary of 13 week oral neurotoxicity test in
            rats preliminary information). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.  2 p.

43681500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of risk/exposure data in support of reregistration
            for TEMIK 15G (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

43681501    Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1995) Estimation of the Potential Exposure To Aldicarb in Foods:
            Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 95-01. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 22 p.

43702800    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of Aldicarb
            Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43702801    Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1995) Estimation of the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb in Foods: Lab
            Project Number: ALDICARB 95-01. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 28 p.

43761500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of
            the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43761501    Denny, I; Jones, R. (1995) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States:
            Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis January 1 through June 30, 1995: (Exclusive of
            Long Island): Lab Project Number: EC-92-182: 44815: 92682. Unpublished study prepared
            by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 57 p.

43805700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
            Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

43805701    Skinner, W.; Jao, N. (1995) Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb: Lab
            Project Number: 468W-1: 468W: EC-94-275. Unpublished study prepared by PTRL West,
            Inc. 138 p.

43805702    Skinner, W. (1995) Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb: Lab Project
            Number: 467W-1: 467W: EC-94-274. Unpublished study prepared by PTRL West, Inc.  141
            P-

43829600    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Toxicology Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2)
            and the Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.
                                      Page 167 of 191

-------
43829601    Weiler, M. (1995) Developmental Neurotoxicity Study with Aldicarb in Rats: Final Report:
            Lab Project Number: HWI6224-213. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Wisconsin,
            Inc. 891 p.

43829602    Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1995) A 13-Week Study of the Potential Effects of
            Orally Administered Aldicarb Technical on Behavior, Neurochemistry and Neuromorphology
            in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97234. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Labs, Ltd.
            825 p.

43842000    FMC Corp. (1995) Submission of Residue and Exposure: Reentry Protection Data in Support
            of the Registration Standard for Carbofuran. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43842001    Carlson, D. (1995) Soil Residue Dissipation, Dermal Passive Dosimetry Exposure and
            Inhalation Passive Dosimetry Exposure-Potatoes: Justification for Waiver of Carbofuran
            Data Call-in. Unpublished study prepared by FMC Corp. 71 p.

43842400    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Aldicarb
            Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43 842401    Gillings, O. (1995) Storage Stability of Aldicarb Residues in Green Coffee Beans, Roasted
            Coffee Beans, and Instant Coffee: Lab Project Number: EC-94-293: 44916. Unpublished
            study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 226 p.

43844700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Aldicarb
            Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43844701    Andrawes, N.; Smitley, C. (1995) Aldicarb-Stability of Residues on Frozen Soybean
            Processed Fractions: Addendum: Quantitative Data Tables & Example Chromatograms: Lab
            Project Number: EC-92-200: SOP-90025. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
            Co. 55 p.

43852500    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of the Aldicarb
            Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43852501    Rosenheck, L.;  Schuster, L. (1995) Worker Loader and Applicator Exposure to Temik 15G:
            Lab Project Number: 94388. Unpublished study prepared by ABC Labs, Inc., Pan-Ag Div.
            344 p.

43902400    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Fate in Plants Data in Support of the
            Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43902401    Hathcock, T.; Kimmel, E.; Ruzo, L. (1996) A Metabolism Study with (Carbon  14)-Aldicarb
            in Citrus (Lemon Trees): Lab Project Number: 478W-1: 478W: EC-94-278. Unpublished
            study prepared by PTRL West, Inc. 234 p.

43961100    U.S. EPA (1996) Submission of Toxicity Data on 17 Pesticides. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43961101    McCann, I; Teeters, W.; Urban, D. et al. (1981) A short-term dietary toxicity test on small
            mammals, p.  132-142 of the Second Conference of Avian and Mammalian Wildlife
            Toxicology, Lamb, D.; Kenaga, E. Eds.; Published in American Society for Testing and
            Materials, ASTM STP 757; 1981.

43970000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Residue Chemistry Data in Support of TEMIK
            Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.
                                      Page 168 of 191

-------
43970001    Wells-Knecht, M; Andrawes, N. (1996) (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb Metabolism in Citrus (Lemon
            Trees): Supplemental Report to MRID No. 43902401: Lab Project Number: EC-95-320.
            Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 286 p.

43988300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Pesticide Fate in the Environment Data in
            Support of Reregistration of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43988301    Jones, R. (1996) Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter
            Applications to Grapes: Lab Project Number: 45049. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Co. 131 p.

43994400    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Pesticide Fate & Residues in the Environment
            Data in Support of Registration Standard for TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
            Transmittal of 1 Study.

43994401    Denny, I; Jones, R. (1996) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States:
            Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis July 1 through December 31,  1995: (Exclusive of
            Long Island, NY): Lab Project Number: 44991: EC-92-182: SOP 90009. Unpublished study
            prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 58 p.

44005000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
            Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44005001    Das, Y. (1990) Metabolism of (S-Methyl-(carbon 14))Aldicarb Under Aerobic Soil
            Conditions: Lab Project Number: EC-90-099: 90020. Unpublished study prepared by
            Innovative Scientific Services, Inc. 85 p.

44196700    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Amended
            Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44196701    Tew, E. (1996) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Pacific Northwest Potatoes
            Harvested 120 Days After an At-Planting, In-Furrow Application of TEMIK 15G at 3 Ib
            ai/Acre: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 96T10525: 45187: 10525-01.  Unpublished study
            prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag co. 414 p.

44204900    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in Support of the Amended
            Registrations of Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW
            Aldicarb Pesticide Lock 'n Load Closed Handling System. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

44204901    Barraj,L. (1996) Assessing the Impact of Reducing the PHI for Aldicarb on Potatoes to 120
            Days: Comparison of the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb Using Monitoring Data and Data
            from the 120 Day PHI Field Trial Study. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences,
            Inc. 14 p.

44204902    Barraj, L. (1996) Using the 1996 Florida and PNW Monitoring Data to Estimate the Potential
            Exposure to Aldicarb on Potatoes. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc.  15
            P-

44209000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Registration of
            Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44209001    Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Pacific Northwest Potato Farmgate Study: Amended Final Report:
            Lab Project Number: 96T11379: 45217. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
            Co. 194 p.
                                      Page 169 of 191

-------
44244700   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Amended
           Registration for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44244701   Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Magnitude of Residues in Potatoes from Regions V and IX Harvested
           120 Days After an At-Planting Application of Temik 15G at 3 Ib ai/acre: Lab Project Number:
           96T11218: 45257: 11218-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 447 p.

44287600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure and Risk Assessment Data in Support
           of the Reregistration of TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44287601   Barraj, L. (1997) Estimating the Potential Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Foods: Lab Project
           Number: ALDICARB 97-03. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 24 p.

44335700   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in Support of the Label
           Amendments and Crop Group Petition for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticides in/on Citrus.
           Transmittal of 1 Study.

44335701   Barraj, L. (1997) Estimating the Potential Aggregate Exposure to Aldicarb in Food and
           Water: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-04. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
           Poulenc Ag Co. 28 p.

44338600   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in Support of the Label
           Amendment for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44338601   Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1997) Assessing the Impact of the Temik Label Expansion on the
           Potential Exposure to Aldicarb in Potatoes: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-02.
           Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc.  18 p.

44341800   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Amended
           Registration for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide and Tolerance Petition for Aldicarb
           in/on Citrus. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44341801   Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Florida Potato Farmgate Study: Lab Project Number: 97T12422:
           45366. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 287 p. {OPPTS 860.1500}

44524600   Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1998) Submission of Exposure and Risk Assessment Data in
           Support of the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44524601   Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1998) Using the Elapsed Time Approach to Estimate the Potential
           Aggregate Exposure to Aldicarb in Food and Water: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 98-
           01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 30 p.

44580900   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the
           Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44580901   Jones, R.; Scarborough, T. (1998) Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company Response to April 9, 1998
           EFED Requests for Information on Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: AS-98-01: RTP-2162.
           Unpublished study prepared by Rhone Poulenc Ag Co.  111 p.

44585400   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Submission of Environmental Fate, Toxicity,
           and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Organophosphorus and Carbamate
           Compounds. Transmittal of 16 Studies.
                                      Page 170 of 191

-------
44585406   Bischoff, A.; Linn, I; Hagen, H. (1970) Evaluations of Pest Control Programs: Lab Project
            Number: FW-l-R-8:1-4. Unpublished study prepared by Shell Development Co., Union
            Carbide Company, State Department of Public Health and Mosquito Abatement Districts. 12
            P-

44598600   US EPA (1998) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb and
            Fonofos. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44598601   Pickering, Q.; Gilliam,  W. (1982) Toxicity of aldicarb and fonofos to the early-life-stage of
            the fathead minnow. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 11:699-702.

44598700   Hercules, Inc. (1998) Submission of Toxicity, Product Chemistry, Exposure and Risk
            Assessment Data in Support of the Petition for Tolerance of (inert ingredients). Transmittal of
            9 Studies.

44598701   van Straten, S. (1998) Volatile Compounds in Food (Naturally Occurring (inert ingredients)).
            Unpublished study prepared by TNO. 15 p.

44598702   The Committee of Flavour Experts of the Council of Europe. (1998) Monographs for (inert
            ingredients). Natural Flavouring Substances, Their Sources, and Added Artificial Flavouring
            Substances (5)4:2-3.

44598703   Opdyke, D.  (1978) Fragrance raw material monographs for (inert ingredients). Food and
            Cosmetics Toxicology (16):853-861.

44598704   Palazzolo, R. (1963) Acute Toxicity Studies on (inert ingredients): (Acute Oral Toxicity and
            Eye Irritation) (in Rats and Rabbits): Lab Project Number: 92-2F. Unpublished study prepared
            by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc. 12 p.

44598705   Nelson, L.; Kundzin, M. (1968) Three-Month Dietary Feeding in Albino Rats: (inert
            ingredients): Lab Project Number: 92-2A. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Labs.,
            Inc. 52 p.

44598706   Kohn, F. (1963) 90-Day Subacute Oral Toxicity of (inert ingredients) in Albino Rats: Lab
            Project Number: 92-2E. Unpublished study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs, Inc. 50 p.

44598707   Kohn, F. (1964) Two-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study of (inert ingredients) in Albino Rats:
            Lab Project Number: 92-2C.  Unpublished study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc.
            114 p.

44598708   Cervenka, H. (1964) Two-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity of (inert ingredients) in Beagle Dogs:
            Lab Project Number: 92-2D. Unpublished study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc.
            83 p.

44598709   Safe, S. (1994) Environmental and dietary (inert ingredients) and human health: is there a
            problem Environmental Health Perspectives 13(103):346-351.

44613200   Rhone-Poulenc (1998)  Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Registration
            of Temik 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44613201   Norris, F. (1998) Aldicarb: Mobility in Soil After Application to Florida Ridge Soils Under
            the Best Management Plan: Lab Project Number: 96T09666: 45613: 95-199-001.
            Unpublished study prepared by HydroScience, Inc. and Agvise Laboratories, Inc. 1586 p.

44636100   Rhone Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
            Registration of Temik 15 G. Transmittal of 1 Study.
                                       Page 171 of 191

-------
44636101    Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (1998) Assessment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats
            Following Topical Application of Temik 15G Grit for Three Weeks: Final Report: Lab
            Project Number: 65C-7202. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 160
            p. {870.3200}

44678000    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Environmental Fate and Residue
            Chemistry Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik
            15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44678001    Norris, F.; Pickrell, S. (1998) Aldicarb: Mobility in Soil After Application to Florida Ridge
            Soils Under the Best Management Plan: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 96T09666:
            45640: 95-119-001. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company, and
            HydroScience, Inc. 1917 p.

44699600    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Submission of Toxicity, and Risk Assessment
            and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

44699601    Goldman, L.; Beller, M.; Jackson, R. (1990) Aldicarb food poisonings in California, 1985-
            1988: toxicity estimates for humans. Archives of Environmental Health 45(3): 141-147.

44699602    Goldman, L.; Smith, D.; Neutra, R. et al. (1990) Pesticide food poisoning from contaminated
            watermelons in California, 1985 (Aldicarb). Archives of Environmental Health 45(4): 229-
            236.

44699603    Hirsch, G.; Mori, B.; Morgan, B. et al. (1987) Report of illnesses caused by aldicarb-
            contaminated cucumbers. Food Additives and Contaminants 5(2): 155-160.

44719300    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in
            Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G NW
            Aldicarb Pesticide, and Temik Brand 15G CP Aldicarb Pesticide.  Transmittal of 1 Study.

44719301    Barraj, L.; Walters, J. (1998) Assessment of the Potential Acute Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb
            in Food and Water: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 98-02. Unpublished study prepared by
            Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 99 p.

44734900    Rhone-Poulenc AG Company (1999) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
            Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik 15G Grit. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44734901    Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (1998) Assessment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats
            Following Topical Application of Temik 15G for Three Weeks: Amended Final Report: Lab
            Project Number: 65C-7202: RT98-GRIT: RTI-671. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
            Poulenc Ag Company. 164 p. {OPPTS 870.3200}

44845100    Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submission of Residue Chemistry Data
            in Support of the Registration of Carbamate. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44845101    Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket Survey: Interim Study Report: Lab
            Project Number: TCI-99-001: CARDC 1336: ML98-0768-CMB. Unpublished study prepared
            by Novigen Sciences, Inc. and Morse Laboratories, Inc. 471 p.

44847400    Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1999) Submission of Product Chemistry, Toxicity, Risk
            Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the Petition for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on
            Bananas. Transmittal of 5 Studies.
                                      Page 172 of 191

-------
44847401   Helfant, L. (1999) Product Chemistry: Banana In-Plant System: Lab Project Number:
           98005LJH. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 58 p. {OPPTS 830.1550,
           830.1620, 830.1670, 830.1800, 830.6302, 830.6304, 830.6315, 830.7300, 830.7000}

44847402   Carringer, S. (1998) Temik 15 GG: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC
           from Stem Injection Treatment (Central and South America): Final Study Report: Lab Project
           Number: 97T112971: 45655:  12971-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
           Co. and McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 417 p. {OPPTS 860.1500}

44847403   Carringer, S. (1998) Temik 15 GG: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana
           Processed Fractions from Stem Injection Treatment (Central and South America): Lab Project
           Number: 97TI13621: 45656: 13621-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag
           Co. and McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 268 p.

44847404   Szuter, S. (1998) Aldicarb: Storage Stability of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC Pulp
           and Peel and the Processed Fractions of Puree and Chips: Interim Study Report: Lab Project
           Number: MK12-97: 90021. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and
           McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 327 p. {OPPTS 860.1380}

44847405   Barraj, L. (1999) Assessment of the Potential Acute Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Water
           and Foods, Including Bananas: Lab Project Number: 99-01. Unpublished study prepared by
           Novigen Sciences, Inc. 118 p.

44860100   Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1999)  Submission of Reduced-Risk Pesticide Rationale for
           Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44860101   Aldridge, K.; Ortego, L.; Rieth, J. et al. (1999) Reduced Risk and Organophosphate (OP)
           Replacement Rationale for Aldicarb Use on Bananas-the Banana In-Plant System: Lab Project
           Number: AS-07-99. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 251 p.

44929700   Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submission of Residue Data in Support
           of the Registrations of the Aldicarb, Carbaryl, Methomyl, Oxamyl, and Thiodicarb Containing
           Products Temik 15G CP, Temik 15G Lock'n Load, Temik 15G Lock'n Load-CA, Temik 15G
           NW, Sevin 4F, Sevin 80WSP, Sevin XLR Plus, Lannate LV, Lannate SP, Vydate C-LV,
           Vydate L, and Larvin 3.2. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44929701   Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket Survey: Interim Study Report-
           No.2: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001: ML98-0768-CMB: TCI-99-001/CARDC 133.
           Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc.; Morse Laboratories, Inc.; Colorado
           Analytical Research and Development Corporation. 546 p.

44985600   Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submission of Residue Chemistry Data
           in Support of the Reregistration of Carbamate Containing Products Temik 15G, 15G Lock'n
           Load, 15G Lock'n Load and 15G NW, Sevin 4F, 80WSP and XLR Plus, Lannate LV and SP,
           Vydate C-LV and L and Larvin 3.2. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44985601   Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket Survey: Interim Report-No. 3: Lab
           Project Number: TCI-99-001. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc., and
           Morse Laboratories, Inc. 642 p.

45068600   U.S. EPA (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Aldicarb and
           Methamidophos. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45068601   Moser, V. (1999) Comparison of Aldicarb and Methamidophos Neurotoxicity at Different
           Ages in the Rat: Behavior and Biochemical Parameters. Toxicology and Applied
           Pharmacology  157:94-106.
                                      Page 173 of 191

-------
45068700 U.S. EPA (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Aldicarb and
Methamidophos. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45068701 U.S. EPA (1999) Letters to the Editor. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 161:302-305.

45079700 Aventis CropSciences (2000) Submission of Product Chemistry, and Toxicity Data in Support
of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, Temik 15G Aldicarb
Pesticide for Use on Potatoes Only, and Temik Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of
6 Studies.

45079701 Tobia, A. (2000) Aldicarb: Absence of Justification for Requiring a FQPA Factor for
Aldicarb: Toxicology. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 54 p.

45079702 Tobia, A. (2000) Aldicarb: Response to FIFRA SAP Report of February, 1999: Toxicology.
Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 31 p.

45079703 Lunchick, C.; Tobia, A. (2000) Rebuttal to the Aldicarb Data Evaluation Record for the 21 -
Day Dermal Toxicity Study Assessment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following
Topical Applications of Temik 15G Grit for Three Weeks MRID# 44636101. And Rebuttal to
EPA 10/01/99 Review of: Additional Aldicarb 5 Day Rat Dermal Toxicity Study Protocol
(D259834 Aldicarb (098301)): Lab Project Number: 01ALDOO/ADVENTIS: D259834
ALDICARB: 098301. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 24 p.

45079704 Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (2000) Assessment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats
Following Topical Applications of Temik 15G Grit for One Week: Final Report: Lab Project
Number: 65C-07594: RTI-749. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute.
128 p. {OPPTS 870.3200}

45079705 Tyl, R.; Anderson, S. (2000) The Toxicokinetics of Peripheral Cholinesterase Inhibition from
Orally Administered Aldicarb in Adult Male CD Rats: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
65C-07532-100: 65C-07532-200: RTI-726. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle
Institute. 108 p. {OPPTS 870.8500}

45079706 Linchick, C.; Powell, G. (2000) Temik Brand ISO-Quality Control Data on Dust Control of
Gypsum and Grit Formulations: Lab Project Number: 02ALDOO/AVENTIS. Unpublished
study prepared by Aventis Crop Science. 101 p.

45150700 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
Registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45150701 Moser, V. (1999) Aldicarb Replication Study. Unpublished study prepared by US EPA,
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Lab. 403 p.

45164701 Carringer, S. (2000) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket Survey: Final Report: Lab Project
Number: TCI-99-001: METH-118: 98-03. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences,
Inc. and Morse Laboratories. 3359 p.

45167200 Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support
of the Reregistration of Ethoprop. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45167201 Urtizberea, M. (1999) Worker Exposure Study During Application in Banana Plantation with
Temik 10G: Lab Project Number: SA 98337: RPS/ALD/98072. Unpublished study prepared
by ADME Bioanalyses. 156 p. {OPPTS 875.1000}
Page 174 of 191

-------
45178000    Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
            Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

45178001    Ramanarayanan, T. (2000) Kinetics Modeling of Degradation of Aldicarb and its Metabolites
            in Anaerobic Aquatic Condition: Lab Project Number: B002970. Unpublished study prepared
            by Aventis CropScience. 30 p.

45178002    Holmsen, J. (2000) Response to EPA Aldicarb Data Evaluation Record 2, Anaerobic Aquatic
            Metabolism of (carbon-14) Aldicarb (Agency/EFED Review dated May 18, 2000): Lab
            Project Number: B002980. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 21 p.

45181800    Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the Petition
            for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on Bananas. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

45181801    Szuter, S. (2000) Aldicarb: Storage Stability of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC Pulp
            and Peel and the Processed Fractions of Puree and Chips: Final Report: Lab Project Number:
            MK12-97. Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 415 p. {OPPTS
            860.1380}

45181802    Carringers, S. (2000) TEMIK 15GC: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC
            from Stump Implant Treatment, Year 2 (Central and South America): Final Report: Lab
            Project Number: 97T15173: B002854:  15173-01. Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie
            Laboratories, Inc. 312 p. {OPPTS 860.1500}

45181803    Gough, S. (2000) Aldicarb/Banana/ Residue Decline/1998-99: Final Study Report: Lab
            Project Number: 46028: 98T16299: 16299-01. Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie
            Laboratories, Inc. 223 p.

45185000    Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of
            Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45185001    Weiler,M. (2000) Addendum to Developmental Neurotoxicity Study with Aldicarb in Rats:
            Lab Project Number: 03 ALDOOO/AVENTIS. Unpublished study prepared by  Covance
            Laboratories, Inc. 413 p. {OPPTS 870.6300}

45205500    Aventis CropScience. (2000) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of the Petition for
            Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on Bananas. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45205501    Vergnon, J. (2000) Worker Exposure Study During Application in Banana Plantation with
            Aldicarb Banana In-Plant System Sachets: Lab Project Number: RPS/ALD/99051: 99011 HI.
            Unpublished study prepared by Aventis Cropscience. 176 p.

45433200    FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force (2001) Submission of Exposure
            Assessment Data in Support of the Validation of PRZM. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45433201    Jones, R.; Russell, M. (2001) FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force: Final
            Report. Unpublished study prepared by FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force.
            768 p.

45451400    Aventis CropSciecne (2001) Submission of Toxicity, Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in
            Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1  Study.

45451401    Tobia, A. (2001) Scientific Response to Issues Raised in the EPA's February 8, 2001 HED
            HI ARC Report on the Re-Evaluation of Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis
            CropScience. 289 p.
                                      Page 175 of 191

-------
45467500 Aventis CropScience (2001) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of
Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45467501 Tyl, R. (2000) Responses to: Health Effects Division Data Evaluation Records (DER No.
013268: Aldicarb, TEMIK 15G Grit 21-Day Dermal Toxicity Study and DER 014169:
Aldicarb, TEMIK 15G Grit 5-Day Dermal Toxicity Study): Lab Project Number:
01GSP2001. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 19 p.

45529100 Aventis CropScience (2001) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45529101 Hodges, L. (2001) Review of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Draft Chapter on
Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis
CropScience. 94 p.

45592100 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Pesticide Use, Environmental Fate, Toxicity and
Product Chemistry Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products
Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for
Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, and Temik Brand
15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potato. Transmittal of 17 Studies.

45592101 Scarborough, T. (2001) 1999-2000 TEMIK User Studies. Unpublished study prepared by
Aventis CropScience. 78 p.

45592102 McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D. (1987) Aldicarb Vapor Pressure: Lab Project Number: 40052:
803P15. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 9 p.

45592103 McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D. (1987) Design and Validation of High Flow Apparatus for Vapor
Pressure Determinations: Lab Project Number: 40182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-
Poulenc, Inc. 20 p.

45592106 Allan, J. (2001) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (s-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb in
Two Soils under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 (Degrees Celcius): Interim Report: Lab
Project Number: 601YT: B003572. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 120
P-

45592107 Jesudason, P. (2001) Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb Under
Laboratory Conditions at 25 Degrees Celcius: Lab Project Number: 602YT: B003556.
Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience and AGVISE Laboratories, Inc. 127 p.

45592200 US EPA (2002) Submission of Exposure, Risk, Pesticide Use, Toxicity, Safety, Residue, and
Environmental Fate Data. Transmittal of 50 Studies.

45592235 People, S.; Maddy, K.; Smith, C. (1978) Occupational Exposure to Temik (Aldicarb) as
Reported by California Physicians for 1974-1976. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 20:321-
324.

45602900 Aventis Cropscience (2002) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide,
Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide
for Use on Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW
Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potato. Transmittal of 4 of 21 Studies.

45602901 Lemley, A.; Zhong, W. (1983) Kinetics of Aqueous Base and Acid Hydrolysis of Aldicarb,
Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Journal of Environmental Science Health
B 18(2): 189-206.
Page 176 of 191

-------
45602902 Hansen, I; Spiegel, M. (1983) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and
Aldicarb Sulfone. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2:147-153.

45602903 Lemley, A.; Zhong, W. (1984) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and
Aldicarb Sulfone at Parts per billion Levels in Aqueous Mediums. Journal Agricultural Food
Chemistry 32:714-719.

45602904 Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R. et al. (1987) Laboratory Studies on Mechanisms for the
Degradation of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Environmental
Toxicology and Chemistry 6:377-394.

45632500 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the
Amended Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, TEMIK Brand 15G CP
Aldicarb Pesticide, TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Sale and Use in California Only
and TEMIK Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmitted of 4 Studies.

45632501 Helfant, L. (2002) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry: Lab Project
Number: 021802LJH: B003770. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 33 p.
{OPPTS 830.1550, 830.1650}

45649100 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the
Registration of TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide and TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb
Pesticide for Agricultural Use. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45649101 Helfant, L. (2002) TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry: Lab Project
Number: 040102LJH. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 21 p. {OPPTS
830.1550 and 830.1650}

45739800 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide,
Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide
for Use on Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW
Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoe. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

45739801 Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb in 2
Soils Under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 Degrees C: Final Report: Lab Project
Number: 601YT: B003965. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 167 p.

45739802 Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb
Sulfone in 2 Soils Under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 Degrees C: Lab Project
Number: 607YT: B003573. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 101 p.

45906800 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide,
Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agriculture Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide
for Use on Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Sale and Use in California
Only, Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoes. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45906801 Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (S-Methyl-Carbon 14)-Aldicarb
Sulfone in Two Soils Under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 (Degrees) C (Amended
Report to Study 607YT, Document Number B003573): Lab Project Number: B004162:
607YT: B003573. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 102 p.

46065200 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Product Chemistry, Risk and Exposure Data in
Support of the Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 3 Studies.
Page 177 of 191

-------
46065201 Helfant, L.; Ligon, R. (2003) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry.
Project Number: PC030417, B004379, CM/62. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
Cropscience LP. 82 p.

46065203 Fish, J. (2003) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Formulation Development Importance of
Formulation on Application Uniformity, Worker Safety and Customer Satisfaction. Project
Number: JDF2003/1. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 12 p.

46065204 Ligon, R. (2001) Three Year Storage Evaluation of Temik 15 G Gypsum. Project Number:
WOODBINE/061501. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 25 p.

46 100300 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the
Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46 10030 1 Lunchick, C. (2003) Bayer CropScience Comments Regarding Dust Content of Bayer Brand
Aldicarb Formulations and Its Relationship to Operator Exposure Potential. Project Number:
WOODBINE/08180, CL072003. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 68 p.

46 1 3 1000 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of
the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular
Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Citrus Use, Temik
Brand 15G Aldicarb for Sale and Use in California Only, and Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb
Pesticide for Use on Potatoe. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46131001 Cameron, A. (2003) Supplementary Report to: A Safety and Tolerability Study of Aldicarb at
Various Dose Levels in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers: Final Report. Project Number:
003237, SOP/REC/030. Unpublished study prepared by Inveresk Research International and
BCG (Europe) Ltd. 136 p.

Bayer CropScience LP (2004) Submission of Residue, Risk and Exposure Data in Support of
the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

Barraj, L.; Tomerlin, J.; Daniels, C. (2001) Assessment of the Potential Acute Dietary
Exposure to Aldicarb in Water and Foods, Including Bananas. Project Number:
ALDICARB/01/01, 12971/01, 12971/02. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences,
Inc. 168 p.

46427600 Bayer CropScience LP (2004) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the
Registration of Carbamate Products. Transmittal of 1 Study.

4642760 1 Pandian, M. (2004) USD A Pesticide Data Program (PDF) Monitoring Data for Carbamate
Cumulative Risk Assessment. Project Number: DAL 1 19/04. Unpublished study prepared by
Infoscientific.Com, Inc. 86 p.

46466400 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Reregistration of
the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46466401 Movassaghi, S.; Daussin, S.; Hanzas, J. (2005) Surface Water Monitoring for Residues of
Aldicarb in High Use Areas in the United States: Final Study Report. Project Number:
OOT30605, B004894. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer Corp. and
Agvise Inc. 1553 p.

46542800 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.
46340600
46340601
Page 178 of 191

-------
46542802 Hodges, L. (2005) Review of the Preliminary Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects
(EFED) Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Unpublished
study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 66 p.

46571300 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46571301 U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Cancer Institute (1979)
Bioassay of Aldicarb for Possible Carcinogenicity: NCI/CG/TR/136. Bethesda, MD: US
National Institutes of Health. 119 p. NIH Publication no. 79-1391.

46579100 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb and Isoproturon. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46579101 Urtizberea, M. (1999) Worker Loader and Applicator Exposure Study During Application in
Citrus Plantation with Temik 10G. Project Number: R009475, SA/98148. Unpublished study
prepared by Bayer Cropscience. 175 p.

46613000 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46613001 Tobia, A. (2005) Bayer Cropscience Response to EPA Request for Clarification Concerning
the 1992 Wyld et al. Aldicarb Study with Human Volunteers. Project Number:
BCS/003237/1, 003237. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 59 p.

46618000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46618001 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997) NHEERL/EPA Study with Aldicarb: Initial
Measurements of ChE Activity in Rat Brain (AE1). Unpublished study. 2 p.

46627800 Bayer CropScience (2005) Submission of Exposure, Risk and Safety Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

46627801 Hodges, L. (2005) Response to the Phase 3 Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects
(EFED) Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Unpublished
study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 70 p.

46627802 Hall, L.; Shaw, R.; Fish, I; et. al. (2005) Temik 15G Brand Aldicarb: Product Usage and
Methods of Application: Revised Version. Project Number: G201361. Unpublished study
prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 34 p.

46627803 Hovis, A. (2005) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Product Stewardship Review. Project
Number: AH81005. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 13 p.

46638100 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46638101 Barraj, L.; Daniels, C. (2004) Drinking Water Consumption Survey. Project Number: 04/01,
8/000/BOFO/0904/0001. Unpublished study prepared by Exponent. 40 p.

46655400 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the
Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.
Page 179 of 191

-------
46655401    Moore, D.; Thompson, R.; Purbrick, S. (2005) Problem Formulation for the Refined Aquatic
            Risk Assessment of Aldicarb. Project Number: 201373, 88380. Unpublished study prepared
            by Cantox Environmental Inc. 31 p.

46655402    Moore, D.; Purbrick, S.; Thompson, R. (2005) Problem Formulation for the Refined Wildlife
            Risk Assessment of Aldicarb. Project Number: 201374, 88380. Unpublished study prepared
            by Cantox Environmental Inc. 37 p.

46765100    Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1980) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of
            the Registration of Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46765101    Godek, E.; Dolak, M.; Matthews, R.; et. al. (1980) Ames Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test:
            Aldicarb Sulfoxide. Project Number: PH/301/UC/002/80. Unpublished study prepared by
            Pharmakon Laboratories.  14 p.

46765102    Godek, E.; Dolak, M.; Matthews, R.; et. al. (1980) Ames Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test:
            Aldicarb Sulfone. Project Number: PH/301/UC/003/80. Unpublished study prepared by
            Pharmakon Laboratories.  14 p.

46792600    Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Pesticide Use in Support of the Reregistration of
            the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik 15G. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46792601    Hall, L. (2006) Temik Brand 15G Aldicab Pesticide Crop and Geographical Usage
            Information (A Reference Provided for an Endangered Species Assessment of Aldicarb).
            Project Number: G201481. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 76 p.

46793700    Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
            Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
            Transmittal of 5 Studies.

46793701    Jones, R.; Ramanarayanan, T. (2006) Temik BrandlSG Aldicarb Pesticide: Summary of Five
            Retrospective Ground Water Monitoring Studies Conducted for Aldicarb and its Metabolites
            in the Pacific Northwest, California, Texas, Mississippi Delta and the  Southeast Regions fo
            the United States in 2005. Project Number: RAVY010. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
            Corp. 27 p.

46793702    Freeseman, P.; Jones, R.; Lee, R.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring
            Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Pacific Nothwest: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb).
            Project Number: RAAVY005, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
            Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 1033 p.

46793704    Mosier, D.; Jones, R.; Nandihalli, U.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring
            Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in Texas: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide).
            Project Number: RAAVY007, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer
            Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 749 p.

46793705    Wyatt, D.; Jones, R.; Nandihalli, U.; et.  al. (2006)  A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring
            Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Mississippi  Delta Region: (Temik Brand 15G
            Aldicarb Pesticide). Project Number: RAAVY008, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study
            prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 690 p.

46793706    Lee, R.; Jones, R.; Wyatt, D.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study
            for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Southeastern United States. Project Number:
            RAAVY009, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR
            Levine-Fricke, Inc. 2955 p.
                                      Page 180 of 191

-------
46796100   Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Toxicity, Exposure and Risk Data in Support of
            the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
            Transmittal of 3 Studies.

46796101   Ramanarayanan, T. (2006) Refined Aquatic Ecological Exposure Assessment for Total
            Carbamate Residues From Aldicarb. Project Number: MEAVY006. Unpublished study
            prepared by Bayer Corp. 75 p.

46796102   Moore, D.; Thompson, R.; Purbrick, S. (2006) Refined Aquatic Risk Assessment for
            Aldicarb. Project Number: 201482. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental
            Inc. 234 p.

46796103   Moore, D.; Purbrick, S.; Teed, R.; et. al. (2006) Refined Wildlife Risk Assessment for
            Aldicarb. Project Number: 201483, 88390. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox
            Environmental Inc. 493 p.

46796600   Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the
            Reregistration Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46796601   Young, B.; Mihlan, G.; Lantz, I; et. al. (2006) CARES-compatible Dietary Minute Module
            (DMM) Version 2.2 Build 7.8.9 (3/14/06). Project Number: G201503. Unpublished study
            prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. and Infoscientific.Com. 38 p.

46796602   Kelly, I.; Lantz, I; Mihlan, G.; et. al. (2006) CARES-compatible Dietary Minute Module
            (DMM) Version 2.2 Build 7.8.9 (3/14/2006): Technical Manual. Project Number: G201504.
            Unpublished study prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 27 p.

46819500   Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the
            Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
            Transmittal of 1 Study.

46819501   Lenz, M.; Jones, R.; Wyatt, D.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study
            for Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in California.  Project Number: RAAVY006, 004/11333/00,
            YT/01/01. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 767 p.

46834000   Interregional Research Project No. 4 (2006) Submission of Fate Data in Support of the
            Registration of Citrus Fruits Group 10. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46834001   Chen, H. (2006) Crop Grouping Petition Citrus Fruits Group 10, Technical Amendment to 40
            CFR 180.41 (c)(10) and 180.1 (h). Unpublished study prepared by Interregional Research
            Project No. 4 and U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 303  p.

46857900   Interregional Research Project No 4 (2006) Submission of Residue Data. Transmittal of 1
            Study.

46857901   Chen, H. (2006) Crop Grouping Petition Pome Fruit Group 11, Technical Amendment.
            Project Number: A/27200/16/06. Unpublished study prepared by Interregional Research
            Project No. 4.  390 p.

46873100   Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the
            Reregistration of Aldicarb Product Containing Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.
            Transmittal of 1 Study.

46873101   Best, L.; Brewer, L.; Klaine, S.; et. al. (2006) Refined Ecological Risk Assessment for
            Aldicarb Expert Peer Review Panel Process and Comments. Project Number: EPR/32306.
            Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 10 p.
                                      Page 181 of 191

-------
46891400   Bayer CropScience (2006) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the
            Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 5 studies.

46891401   Tobia, A.; Blacker, A. (2006) Bayer CropScience's Assessment and Rebuttal of the Reference
            Dose as Proposed by EPA in the Health Effects Division Revised Preliminary Human Helath
            Risk Assessment for Aldicarb Issued on May 12, 2006. Project Number: G201557.
            Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 16 p.

46891402   Lantz, I; Young, B.; Jones, R.; *et. al. (2006) Aldicarb Acute Dietary Risk Assessment
            Including Food and Drinking Water Volume  1. Project Number:  G201350. Unpublished study
            prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 219 p.

46891403   Kelly, I.; Lantz, I; Mihlan, G.; *et. al. (2006) Incorporating Rapid Reversibility into the
            Dietary Risk Assessment for Aldicarb. Project Number: G201550. Unpublished study
            prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 33 p.

46891405   Hall, L. (2006) The Benefits to Agriculture of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Project
            Number: G201529. 126 p.

46891406   Fischer, D.; Ramanarayanan, T.; Jones, R. (2006) Response to the EPA Environmental Risk
            Assessment for the Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Project Number: G201560.
            Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 23 p.

46898900   Bayer CropScience (2006) Submission of Efficacy Data in Support of the Reregistration of
            Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46898901   Blacker, A.; Jones, R.; Kelly, I.; et. al.; (2006) Aldicarb: Human Health Risk Assessment for
            Use on Currently Registered and Pending Registrations as of May 2006. Project Number:
            G201555. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 86 p.

47061700   Interregional Research Project NO.4. (2007) Submission of Residue  Data in Support of the
            Petition for Tolerance of Stone Fruits Group. Transmittal of 1 Study.

47061701   Chen, H. Crop Grouping Petition-Stone Fruit Group 12, Technical Amendment To 40 CFR
            180.41 (C) 12 And 180.1 (h). Project Number: 09896. Unpublished study prepared by
            Interregional Research Project No. 4. 304 p.

47124600   Bayer CropScience (2007) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the
            Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

47124601   Fisher, D.; Ramanarayanan, T.; Moore, D.; et. al.; (2007) Effects Determination for California
            Red-Legged Frog Potentially Exposed to Aldicarb. Project Number:  88380, 201692.
            Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental, Inc. 138 p.

47164600   Croplife America (2007) Submission of Environmental Fate and Exposure and Risk Data in
            Support of the Preservation of the California Red Legged Frog. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

47164601   Moore, D.; Breton, R.; Rodney, S.; et. al.; (2007) Generic Problem Formulation for California
            Red-Legged Frog. Project Number: 89320, 05232007.  Unpublished study  prepared by Cantox
            Environmental Inc. 87 p.

47164602   Holmes, C.; Vamshi, R. (2007) Data and Methodology Used for  Spatial Analysis of
            California Red Legged Frog Observations and Proximate Land Cover Characteristics. Project
            Number: 3152007, WEI/252/03. Unpublished study prepared by  Waterborne Environmental,
            Inc. (WEI). 19 p.
                                      Page 182 of 191

-------
Appendix E. Generic Data Call-In (GDCI)

Note that a complete generic DCI, with all pertinent instructions, will be sent to
registrants under separate cover.
                                 Page 183 of 191

-------
Appendix F. Product-Specific Data Call-In (PDCI)

Note that a complete product-specific DCI, with all pertinent instructions, will be sent to
registrants under separate cover.
                                 Page 184 of 191

-------
Appendix G. EPA's Batching of Aldicarb Products for Meeting Data Requirements
for Reregistration

       In an effort to reduce the time, resources and number of animals needed to fulfill
the acute toxicity data requirements for reregi strati on  of products containing ALDICARB
as the active ingredient, the Agency has batched products which can be considered
similar for purposes of acute toxicity. Factors considered in the sorting process include
each product's active and inert ingredients (identity, percent composition and biological
activity), type of formulation (e.g., emulsifiable concentrate, aerosol, wettable powder,
granular, etc.), and labeling (e.g., signal word, use classification, precautionary labeling,
etc.).  Note that the Agency is not describing batched  products as "substantially similar"
since some products within a batch may not be considered chemically similar or have
identical use patterns.

       Using available information, batching has been accomplished by the process
described in the preceding paragraph. Notwith-standing the batching process, the Agency
reserves the right to require, at any time, acute toxicity data for an individual product
should the need arise.

       Registrants of products within a batch may choose to cooperatively generate,
submit or cite a single battery of six acute toxicological studies to represent all the
products within that batch. It is the registrants' option  to participate in the process with all
other registrants, only some of the other registrants, or only their own products within a
batch, or to generate all the required acute toxicological studies for each of their own
products. If a registrant chooses to generate the data for a batch, he/she must use one of
the products within the batch as the test material. If a registrant chooses to rely upon
previously submitted acute toxicity data, he/she may do so provided that the data base is
complete and valid by today's standards (see acceptance criteria attached), the
formulation tested  is considered by EPA to be similar for acute toxicity, and the
formulation has not been significantly altered since submission and acceptance of the
acute toxicity data. Regardless of whether new data is generated or existing data is
referenced, registrants must clearly identify the test material by EPA Registration
Number. If more than one confidential statement of formula (CSF) exists for a product,
the registrant must indicate the formulation actually tested by identifying the
corresponding CSF.

       In deciding how to meet the product specific data requirements, registrants must
follow the directions given in the Data Call-In Notice  and its attachments appended to the
RED. The DCI Notice contains two response forms which are to be completed and
submitted to the Agency within 90 days of receipt.  The first form, "Data Call-In
Response," asks whether the registrant will meet the data requirements for each product.
The second form, "Requirements Status and Registrant's Response," lists the product
specific data required for each product,  including the  standard six acute toxicity tests. A
registrant who wishes to participate in a batch must decide whether he/she will provide
the data or depend on someone else to do so. If a registrant supplies the data to support a
batch of products, he/she must select one of the following options: Developing Data
                                  Page 185 of 191

-------
(Option 1), Submitting an Existing Study (Option 4), Upgrading an Existing Study
(Option 5) or Citing an Existing Study (Option 6). If a registrant depends on another's
data, he/she must choose among: Cost Sharing (Option 2), Offers to Cost Share (Option
3) or Citing an Existing Study (Option 6). If a registrant does not want to participate in a
batch, the choices are Options 1, 4, 5 or 6. However, a registrant should know that
choosing not to participate in a batch does not preclude other registrants in the batch from
citing his/her studies and offering to cost share (Option 3) those studies.

Six products were found which contain Aldicarb as the active ingredient.  These products
have been placed into two batches in accordance with the active and inert ingredients and
type of formulation.

Batching Instructions:

NOTE: The technical acute toxicity values included in this document are for
informational purposes only. The data supporting these values may or may not meet the
current acceptance criteria.
Batch 1

EPA Reg. No.
264-330
264-417
264-426
264-523
Percent Active Ingredient
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
Batch 2

EPA Reg. No.
264-322
264-331
Percent Active Ingredient
10.0
10.0
                                  Page 186 of 191

-------
Appendix H. List of Available Related Documents and Electronically Available
Forms

Pesticide Registration Forms are available at the following EPA internet site:
http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/fortns/.

Pesticide Registration Forms (These forms are in PDF format and require the Acrobat
reader)

Instructions:

    1.  Print out and complete the forms. (Note: Form numbers that are bolded can be
       filled out on your computer then printed.)

    2.  The completed form(s) should be submitted in hardcopy in accord with the
       existing policy.

    3.  Mail the forms, along with any additional documents necessary to comply with
       EPA regulations covering your request, to the following address for the Document
       Processing Desk:

             Document Processing Desk (distribution code)*
             Office of Pesticide Programs (7504P)
             Environmental Protection Agency
             1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
             Washington, DC 20460-0001

             * Distribution Codes are as follows:
             (APPL) Application for product registration
             (AMEND) Amendment to existing registration
             (CAN) Voluntary Cancellation
             (EUP) Experimental Use Permit
             (DIST) Supplemental Distributor Registration
             (SLN) Special Local Need
             (NEWCO) Request for new company number
             (NOTIF) Notification
             (PETN) Petition for Tolerance
             (XFER) Product Transfer

DO NOT fax or e-mail any form containing "Confidential Business Information" or
"Sensitive Information."

If you have any problems accessing these forms, please contact Nicole Williams at (703)
308-5551 or by e-mail at williams.mcole@epamail.epa.gov.  If you want these forms
mailed or faxed to you, please contact Lois White, white.lois@epa.gov or Floyd Gayles,
gayles.floyd@epa.gov.

If you have any questions concerning how to complete these forms, please  contact OPP's
ombudsperson for conventional pesticide products: Linda Arlington, (703) 305-5446
                                Page 187 of 191

-------
The following Agency Pesticide Registration Forms are currently available via the
Internet at the following locations:
8570-1
8570-4
8570-5
8570-17
8570-25
8570-27
8570-28
8570-30
8570-32
8570-34
8570-35
8570-36
8570-37
Application for Pesticide
Registration/ Amendment
Confidential Statement of Formula
Notice of Supplemental Registration of
Distribution of a Registered Pesticide
Product
Application for an Experimental Use
Permit
Application for/Notification of State
Registration of a Pesticide To Meet a
Special Local Need
Formulator's Exemption Statement
Certification of Compliance with Data
Gap Procedures
Pesticide Registration Maintenance
Fee Filing
Certification of Attempt to Enter into
an Agreement with other Registrants
for Development of Data
Certification with Respect to Citations
of Data (in PR Notice 98-5)
Data Matrix (in PR Notice 98-5)
Summary of the Physical/Chemical
Properties (in PR Notice 98-1)
Self-Certification Statement for the
Physical/Chemical Properties (in PR
Notice 98-1)
http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-l.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-4.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-5.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-17.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-25.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-27.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-28.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-30.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opprd001/forms/8570-32.pdf

http://www.epa.sov/opppmsdl/PR Notices/pr98-
5.pdf
http://www.epa.sov/opppmsdl/PR Notices/pr98-
5.pdf
http://www.epa.sov/opppmsdl/PR Notices/pr98-
l.pdf
http://www.epa.sov/opppmsdl/PR Notices/pr98-
l.pdf
                                  Page 188 of 191

-------
Pesticide Registration Kit http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/registrationkit/

Dear Registrant:

       For your convenience, we have assembled an on-line registration kit which
contains the following pertinent forms and information needed to register a pesticide
product with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP):
    1.  The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal
       Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) as Amended by the Food Quality
       Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996.

    2.  Pesticide Registration (PR) Notices

       a.  83-3 Label Improvement Program-Storage and Disposal Statements
       b.  84-1 Clarification of Label Improvement Program
       c.  86-5 Standard Format for Data Submitted under FIFRA
       d.  87-1 Label Improvement Program for Pesticides Applied through Irrigation
          Systems (Chemigation)
       e.  87-6 Inert Ingredients in Pesticide Products Policy Statement
       f.  90-1 Inert Ingredients in Pesticide Products; Revised Policy Statement
       g.  95-2 Notifications, Non-notifications, and Minor Formulation Amendments
       h.  98-1 Self Certification of Product Chemistry Data with Attachments  (This
          document is in PDF format and requires the Acrobat reader.)

    Other PR Notices can be found at http://www.epa.gov/opppmsdI/PR  Notices.

    3.  Pesticide Product Registration Application Forms (These forms are in PDF format
       and will require the Acrobat reader.)

       a.  EPA Form No. 8570-1, Application for Pesticide Registration/Amendment
       b.  EPA Form No. 8570-4, Confidential Statement of Formula
       c.  EPA Form No. 8570-27, Formulator's Exemption Statement
       d.  EPA Form No. 8570-34, Certification with Respect to Citations of Data
       e.  EPA Form No. 8570-35, Data Matrix

    4.  General Pesticide Information (Some of these forms are in PDF format and will
       require the Acrobat reader.)

          a.  Registration Division Personnel Contact List
          b.  Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) Contacts
          c.  Antimicrobials Division Organizational Structure/Contact List
          d.   53 F.R. 15952, Pesticide Registration Procedures; Pesticide Data
             Requirements (PDF format)
          e.  40 CFR Part 156, Labeling Requirements for Pesticides and Devices (PDF
             format)
          f.  40 CFR Part 158, Data Requirements for Registration (PDF format)
          g.   50 F.R. 48833, Disclosure of Reviews of Pesticide Data (November 27,
              1985)
                                Page 189 of 191

-------
       Before submitting your application for registration, you may wish to consult some
additional sources of information. These include:

   1.  The Office of Pesticide Programs' Web Site

   2.  The booklet "General Information on Applying for Registration of Pesticides in
       the United States", PB92-221811, available through the National Technical
       Information Service (NTIS) at the following address:

             National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield, VA 22161

       The telephone number for NTIS is (703) 605-6000. Please note that EPA is
       currently in the process of updating this booklet to reflect the changes in the
       registration program  resulting from the passage of the FQPA and the
       reorganization of the Office of Pesticide Programs. We anticipate that this
       publication will become available during the Fall of 1998.

   3.  The National Pesticide  Information Retrieval System (NPIRS) of Purdue
       University's Center for  Environmental and Regulatory  Information Systems. This
       service does charge a fee for subscriptions and custom searches. You can contact
       NPIRS by telephone  at (765) 494-6614 or through their website.

   4.  The National Pesticide  Telecommunications Network (NPTN) can provide
       information on active ingredients, uses, toxicology, and chemistry of pesticides.
       You can contact NPTN by telephone at (800) 858-7378 or through their website:
       http://npic.orst.edu

       The Agency will return a notice of receipt of an application for registration or
       amended registration, experimental use permit, or amendment to a petition if the
       applicant or petitioner encloses with his submission a  stamped, self-addressed
       postcard. The postcard must contain the following entries to be completed by
       OPP:

                 •   Date of receipt
                 •   EPA identifying number
                 •   Product Manager assignment

       Other identifying information may be included by the applicant to link the
       acknowledgment of receipt to the specific application submitted. EPA will stamp
       the date of receipt and provide the EPA identifying File Symbol or petition
       number for the new submission. The identifying number should be used whenever
       you contact the Agency concerning an application for registration, experimental
       use permit, or tolerance petition.
                                 Page 190 of 191

-------
To assist us in ensuring that all data you have submitted for the chemical are
properly coded and assigned to your company, please include a list of all
synonyms, common and trade names, company experimental codes, and other
names which identify the chemical (including "blind" codes used when a sample
was submitted for testing by commercial or academic facilities). Please provide a
CAS number if one has been assigned.
                         Page 191 of 191

-------