www. e pa.gov/o u st
                         FY  2010  Annual  Report On The
                         Underground Storage Tank Program
 For more than 25 years, EPA, states, territories, tribes, and other partners have made
 significant progress in preventing, detecting, and cleaning up leaks from underground
 storage tanks (USTs).

 This report provides a snapshot of LIST program activities in fiscal year (FY) 2010
 (October 1, 2009 - September 30, 2010). The report presents advances made in
 preventing releases, conducting cleanups, and implementing the leaking LIST (LUST)
 provision of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act. These advances ultimately
 result in  preventing environmental contamination, protecting groundwater, and further
 protecting human health and the environment from LIST releases. The LIST program is
 comprised of a meaningful partnership among states, territories, tribes, and EPA.
                  Contents

           Preventing Releases     2-3
           Cleaning Up Releases    4-5
           LUST Recovery Act      6
           Looking Ahead          7
           Letter To Stakeholders   8
  FY 2010 UST Program Highlights
  At the end of FY 2010, there were approximately 597,000 federally-regulated,
  active USTs at approximately 215,000 sites across the country. EPA
  provides money directly to tribes and states to develop and implement their
  prevention and cleanup programs. Collectively, the UST program has
  accomplished a great deal.

  Prevention
     More than two-thirds of active USTs are complying with requirements to
     prevent and detect leaks (exceeding EPA's goal of 65.5 percent
     compliance)
     The compliance rate in Indian country was 67 percent, a significant
     improvement over FY 2009
     UST partners increased inspection efforts and almost all states met the
     first three-year inspection mandate of August 2010, which was required
     by the Energy Policy Act of 2005
     The number of new UST releases identified each year continues to
     decline, with just over 6,300 new leaks reported in FY 2010 (meeting
     EPA's goal to reduce annual  releases to fewer than 9,000); this 11
     percent drop in new releases reported is a dramatic decrease from FY
     2009
     EPA continued regulation development to incorporate Energy Policy Act
     of 2005 requirements and update existing regulations


  Cleanup
     EPA further implemented the LUST Recovery Act, providing support to
     states, territories, and tribes
     Of the 495,000 releases reported since the beginning of the program,
     UST partners completed more than 401,000 cleanups or about 80
     percent, leaving a backlog of just over 93,000 releases remaining to be
     cleaned up
     UST partners cleaned up 11,591 sites, meeting approximately 95 percent
     of EPA's FY 2010 goal to clean  up 12,250 LUST sites
     EPA continued to promote cleaning up and reusing petroleum brownfields
     EPA continued studying and characterizing the LUST cleanup backlog to
     improve the pace of cleanups
Old gas stations may indicate underground
storage tanks are nearby
   FY 2010 GPRA* National UST Program
       Goals And Accomplishments
  Significant Operational
  Compliance Rate

  New Reported Releases

  Cleanups-Total

  Cleanups-Indian Country
65.5%  68.6%


0,000  6,328

12,250  11,591

 30     62
   *Government Performance Results Act of 1993
     I U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     I Office of Underground Storage Tanks

-------
Advances  In  Preventing  Releases
    Since the beginning of the LIST program, preventing petroleum releases into the environment has been one of our primary goals.
    EPA and our partners made major progress in reducing the number of new releases, yet thousands of new releases are discovered
    each year.  The lack of proper operation and maintenance of LIST systems is a main cause of these new releases.  EPA is working
    with states, territories, tribes, and other partners to advance prevention efforts and quickly detect leaks when they occur.

    Our efforts have been enhanced by the release prevention requirements mandated in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. To address
    these mandates, EPA produced several grant guidelines to help states carry out the requirements. Most states already have
    regulations in place that meet the requirements; other states are working to implement the provisions in upcoming years.  EPA
    continues to work with states and tribes to prevent LIST releases and meet the mandates initiated with the Energy Policy Act.
      UST Universe - End  Of FY 2010
States
Indian Country

Active Tanks:
Closed Tanks:
Active Tanks:
Closed Tanks:
594,665
1,742,499
2,668
5,705
    Reducing Confirmed Releases
    In FY 2010, EPA, states, territories, and tribes focused on bringing
    UST systems into compliance and keeping them in compliance
    with leak detection and release prevention requirements. One
    way the program assesses the relative success of these
    prevention efforts is to measure the number of confirmed releases
    each year.

    EPA achieved its FY 2010 goal to reduce confirmed tank releases
    to fewer than 9,000. There's been a steady reduction in annual
    underground storage tank confirmed releases, from almost 67,000
    in FY 1990 to 6,328 in FY2010.
Increasing UST Facility Compliance
One of the key elements in preventing releases is to increase
a facility's operational compliance with UST regulations.
Significant operational compliance (SOC) means that a facility
has the necessary equipment required by current UST
regulations to prevent and detect releases and performs the
necessary UST system operation and maintenance. In FY
2010:

  The national SOC rate was 68.6 percent, which is 3
   percent above our target rate, yet still allows room for
   continued improvement
  The SOC rate in Indian country was 67 percent, which
   is a significant improvement over last year and rivals the
   national rate
      In FY 2010, EPA provided $32.4 million to states
       and territories for UST prevention activities.
          EPA also provided $2.1 million for the
        UST prevention program in Indian country.
    Preventing  Releases In  Indian Country
    Tribes and EPA worked to improve UST compliance in Indian
    country during FY 2010 by enhancing inspection efforts, developing
    additional compliance-focused assistance agreements with tribes,
    and providing training to tribal environmental professionals and
    facility owners and operators.

    Designating tribal inspectors as authorized representatives of EPA
    to inspect USTs can help increase the geographic coverage and
    frequency of inspections in Indian country. It also helps enhance
    relationships and increase the capabilities of tribal inspectors.
    Since EPA's commitment in 2006 to issue federal credentials for
    tribal inspectors, a total of six inspectors received  credentials;
    although currently four hold credentials as a result of changes in
    tribal staff responsibilities and turnover.  In FY 2010, these
    federally-credentialed tribal inspectors contributed significantly to
    meeting the inspection requirements of the Energy Policy Act by
    completing 63 inspections.  EPA anticipates at least two additional
    tribal staff will receive federal credentials in FY 2011.

    In October 2009, the Miccosukee Tribe of Florida hosted our third
    annual tribal-EPA underground storage tank meeting in Miami,
    Florida. Meeting participants worked together to identify tribal
    issues, build relationships, and continue partnerships and
    improvements in the UST program in Indian country.
 Addressing Alternative Fuels
 In FY 2010, EPA continued developing draft guidance
 clarifying how tank owners and operators can demonstrate
 compliance with the federal compatibility requirement if they
 choose to store increased levels of biofuels. EPA requested
 comments on the draft guidance, which was published in the
 November 17, 2010 Federal Register (75 FR 70241). After
 considering public comments, EPA will issue final guidance in
 2011.

 EPA is partnering with the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge
 National Laboratory to quantify the impact of mid-level
 ethanol blends stored in existing tank systems.  We are also
 working with Oak Ridge on a project supported  by the
 Department of Energy to evaluate the material compatibility of
 USTs  and dispenser materials with mid-level ethanol blends.
 We expect final reports for both projects in spring 2011.

 In addition, we are working with EPA's Office of Research
 and Development (ORD) on a number of issues associated
 with increased biofuels use. ORD's Environmental
 Technology Verification program  is conducting a test and
 quality assurance plan that evaluates automatic tank gauging
 systems in USTs storing ethanol-blended fuels. We are also
 working with ORD to understand the accelerated corrosion
 seen in UST sumps storing ethanol blends.

-------
August 2010 - Five Years Of Progress ImplementingThe Energy Policy Act
When Congress passed the Energy Policy Act in August 2005,
EPA, state, territorial, and tribal underground storage tank
programs were presented with a mandate that focused on
reducing LIST releases and required numerous changes to tank
programs. August 2010, the  Energy Policy Act's fifth
anniversary, was an important deadline: the first three year on-
site inspection requirement for all active USTs.  Almost all states
successfully completed the inspection requirement by the
deadline or soon thereafter.  EPA or our tribal partners
conducted inspections at nearly all LIST sites in Indian country.

Over the past five years, EPA, states, territories, and tribes have
shown tremendous dedication and made significant progress
toward meeting all of the Act's requirements and strengthening
LIST release prevention programs.

   All states have grant agreements in place to implement
    Energy Policy Act provisions
   Most states met these major requirements - secondary
    containment, delivery prohibition, state LIST compliance
    report, initial two-year inspections,  public record posted, and
    three-year inspections
   Together, EPA and tribes are continuing to implement the
    2006 tribal strategy and further the goals of the LIST
    program in Indian country

Although our collective progress over the past five years is
impressive, state, territorial, and tribal LIST programs are faced
with a great deal of ongoing work to continue implementing the
prevention requirements. The inspection requirement is  a good
example of this. States and territories did much to  meet the
three-year cycle of inspecting all 215,000 active LIST facilities by
August 2010; yet the three-year inspection cycle is a rolling three
-year requirement continuing  into the future. The operator
training requirement is another example. By August 2012, states
need to ensure operators are trained according to the operator
training standards.
      EPA and tribes are continuing to implement the tribal strategy's
      objectives and work to further the goals of the LIST program in
      Indian country.  Over the coming years, EPA and tribes will
      continue our ongoing work to increase compliance and cleanup
      rates in Indian country.

      State, territorial, and tribal LIST programs, working with  EPA's
      regional LIST programs, are undertaking the remaining
      prevention implementation challenges.  We will  work together
      and continue making strides to keep our land and groundwater
      safe from underground  storage tank releases.
          Number Of States And Territories Indicating They Have Implemented
                     An Energy Policy Act UST Requirement
                         (Of 56 States And Territories)
                              Augusts, 2010

Protect Groundwater

_i Delivery Prohibition
(a/s/07)
01
Q
< Compliance Report

2-Year Inspections
(8/8/07)

I
r
< Public Record Posted
> (1/1/09 - updated annually)
1
Q.
CT Operator Training
01 Requirements Developed

3-Year Inspections
(3/3/10 or soon after")

f
(((0

(I 0

(u ((( Q

(IT e

((T if o



(If (ft
















                       0     10    20    30     40    50   56

                        Total Number Of States And Territories Implementing A Requirement
                                                            ' 50 states met the deadline, three more states met the requirement soon after it
   Inspecting beneath a dispenser
HelpingTHbes Improve  UST  Facility

Compliance
In 2009, EPA entered into a five-year assistance agreement with the
Inter Tribal Council of Arizona. Inc. (ITCA) for UST compliance
assistance training to tribal personnel and owners and operators in
Indian country. The goal of this effort is to improve UST facility
compliance throughout Indian country. In FY 2010, ITCA supported
this goal by:

   Training approximately 150 tribal representatives in UST issues,
    such as: compliance with prevention regulations,  overview of
    requirements, installations, and operation and maintenance
   Developing written resources about health and environmental
    hazards from USTs, operations and maintenance, and best
    management practices
   Fostering communication and opportunities for collaboration
    among tribes and EPA on UST issues

-------
Advances  In Cleaning Up  Releases
                                                                      National Cleanup Backlog
For more than 25 years, the UST program has made great progress in cleaning up leaking underground storage tanks.  EPA
works with states, territories, and tribes to clean up LUST sites and address the hurdles in reducing the backlog of cleanups.

In FY 2010, EPA and our state, territorial, and tribal partners continued to make progress in cleaning up petroleum releases by
completing 11,591 cleanups, of which 62 cleanups were in Indian country. The cleanup backlog, which  is the difference
between the cumulative number of confirmed releases and cleanups completed, also continued to decline from 161,997 sites a
decade ago to 93,123 sites as reported at the end of FY 2010.

Cleanup Backlog Study Update
EPA made significant progress in its analysis of the
backlog of leaking underground storage tank (LUST)
releases. Our analysis is based on data submitted
from 14 states, accounting for  67 percent of the 2006
national backlog. In the study, we look at several
attributes of the releases in the backlog (for example:
age,  media affected, prioritization); how the 14 state
cleanup programs function; challenges state
programs faced; and potential  opportunities to
reduce the backlog.  The goal  of the study is to
present a common basis for discussion about the
backlog and then to serve as a basis for joint
development of backlog reduction strategies
between EPA and all our state and tribal partners.

The study contains a national chapter and 14
individual state chapters. In September, EPA
provided a draft of the national chapter to states for
review and comment. We also distributed individual
draft state chapters to each state for review, with
comments due in December 2010. We intend to
release the final report in summer 2011. Concurrent
with completing the report, EPA will begin discussions
with states and tribes on backlog reduction
implementation strategies.
1
1
Q.
O
u
a
rP c
2 jB
IB S
15 -
h
J= 91
TO ro

T>
01
E

-------
Solutions For Petroleum Brownfield Sites
The UST program continued to provide support to
EPA's area-wide and community revitalization efforts.
In FY 2010, we made significant progress on targeted
geographic projects (corridors) and on investigating the
reuse of petroleum sites for renewable energy projects.

Addressing  Petroleum Sites Along
Corridors
The UST program continued to foster cleaning up and
reusing petroleum-contaminated sites along
transportation corridors. EPA staff provided technical
assistance and participated in workshops, meetings,
and discussions throughout the year in support of
petroleum brownfields corridor projects.  For example:

   Region 4 UST and Brownfields programs and
    several other federal programs continued to
    promote and support remediation and revitalization
    efforts along two corridors - Alabama's  Selma-to-
    Montgomery Civil Rights Trail and the Tamiami Trail
    in southern Florida
   Region 3 is providing technical assistance and
    working with state and county officials in Virginia to
    foster work at petroleum sites along Route 1  in
    Prince William County
   Region 9 hosted a kick-off meeting and  provided an
    area-wide map of petroleum sites along California's
    Interstate 710 Corridor in Los Angeles
Reusing Petroleum Brownfields For
Renewable Energy Projects
The UST program continued to explore with the U.S.
Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL) important characteristics of siting alternative fuel
stations at former gas stations. Converting these stations into
alternative fuel stations may present opportunities that support
our country's use of advanced vehicles, such as plug-in hybrid
electric and all-electric vehicles. NREL plans to release study
results in early 2011.

See EPA's petroleum brownfields website.
  Before - old gas station
  site; after - new firehouse
  in Trenton, New Jersey
EPA Recommends Investigating

And Cleaning Up Lead Scavengers

At LUST Sites
Although Congress banned lead in gasoline in the 1990s, lead levels and
their associated additives still persist in the environment.  Two additives,
ethylene dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), are
probable human carcinogens. While there are established maximum
contamination levels for EDB and 1,2-DCA, many state agencies that
implement EPA's UST program do not routinely sample for these
additives at legacy UST sites. A few states, however, demonstrated
leadership by exploring concentrations of these constituents at their sites
and worked with EPA on further technical evaluations. EPA scientists
surveyed concentrations of EDB and 1,2-DCA at leaking UST sites. The
study suggested that hazards from these additives remain at an unknown
number of legacy spills of leaded gasoline. Based on this assessment,
EPA in May 2010 recommended state agencies monitor for EDB and 1,2-
DCA at UST sites where leaded motor fuels were or are presently stored
and take appropriate action at those sites where these contaminants are
found.
              Conducting direct push soil sampling

-------
LUST  Recovery Act
   American Recovery And Reinvestment Act Provided  EPA
   With $200 Million To Clean Up Underground Storage Tank Releases
   February 2010 marked the first anniversary of the American
   Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which provided
   $200 million of LUST Trust Fund money to assess and clean
   up releases of contamination from federally-regulated USTs.
   This one time infusion of money is helping to increase the
   number of assessments and cleanups beyond those
   traditionally accomplished through annual appropriations.

   LUST Recovery Act money is being used to assess and clean
   up eligible tank releases in states, territories, and in Indian
   country.  In addition to providing environmental and economic
   benefits, these activities are also creating and retaining jobs.
   Through the end of FY 2010, states and territories spent
   approximately $66.9 million of their LUST cooperative
   agreement money.  Additionally EPA spent approximately
   $2.3 million to help clean up tank releases in Indian country.

   EPA gave states and territories discretion to spend LUST
   Recovery Act money on eligible projects, according to their
   needs.  For example, some states are investing the money in
   assessments, providing states with information on the degree
   and extent of contamination at many small sites. Some
   states are using the money to close many small sites.  Still
   other states are focusing efforts on a few difficult sites. EPA
   also provided states and territories with flexibility to use LUST
   Recovery Act money either directly at the site or indirectly by
   paying for state personnel to oversee activities.

   States and territories are making significant progress in
   assessing and cleaning up LUST releases with LUST
   Recovery Act money.  The chart below demonstrates the
   UST program's accomplishments and performance.
        LUST Recovery Act
       Performance Measures
    Site assessments initiated

    Site assessments completed

    Cleanups initiated

    Cleanups completed
Cumulative Results
 2/17/09-9/30/10
       780

       642

       709

       592
                    EPA's interactive map shows LUST
                   Recovery Act locations, performance
                        data,  and jobs information
                                                     LUST ARRA Funding And Spending
                                                       (as of September 30,2010)

                                                   95.3% To States (Green)
                                                    3.2% For Indian Country (Purple)


                                                       State Grants Spent By States 34.4%

                                                       State Grants Vet To Be Spent 56.3%

                                                       State Grant Returned By Florida 4.6%

                                                       Tribal Funds Spent 1.2%

                                                      I Tribal Funds Unspent 2.0%

                                                       F.PA Management And Oversight Spent .8%

                                                       EPA Management And Oversight Unspent .7%
As of September 2010, LUST Recovery Act money was spent
at 1,452 sites where one or more of the measures were
achieved. In addition, LUST Recovery Act money contributed
to other assessments and cleanups at an additional 2,222
sites which did not begin as Recovery Act projects and those
that are not yet completed.

In 2010, EPA continued its work to  clean up sites in Indian
country using LUST Recovery Act money, which EPA
allocated to existing cleanup contracts with Native Alaskan or
Native American firms. This one time addition of money
substantially increased EPA's ability to assess and clean up
leaking underground storage tank sites in Indian country.
The money is supporting work at approximately 50 sites in
Indian country benefiting over 20 tribal communities.

By this time next year, most LUST Recovery Act grants will
be completed, with just a few that are expected to need
longer timeframes to complete. We have already seen great
accomplishments from this infusion of money to the program
and expect even more accomplishments in FY 2011.
                                                                                         PROJECT FUNDED BY AMEI
                                                                                        RiCOVOTANDSEINVESTMl
                                                                       LUST Recovery Act money is helping
                                                                       clean up this site in Washington, D.C.

-------
Looking Ahead
 FY 2010 was a year of advancement and achievement.  UST partners achieved good progress toward meeting our goals and
 in advancing prevention and cleanup efforts. We also made meaningful strides assessing and cleaning up leaking UST sites
 using LUST Recovery Act money.

 Challenges remain, though, as there is still much to be done to prevent releases and to clean up contaminated sites. In 2011
 and upcoming years, EPA will focus on the traditional goals of the program  preventing and cleaning up releases  by:
    Continuing to work with states to meet the mandates and deadlines of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
    Implementing the LUST provision of the Recovery Act of 2009, providing support to states, territories, and tribes
    Working with tribes to continue implementing the tribal-EPA UST strategy
    Continuing the process to update our regulations
    Ensuring that each UST facility in the country is inspected once every three years
    Addressing technical and regulatory issues involved with alternative fuels
    Exploring better ways to identify compliance and cleanup solutions
    Developing strategies to help revitalize communities and clean up abandoned gas station sites
    Implementing strategies to reduce the cleanup backlog
    Bolstering the availability of adequate funding for cleanups
    Providing support on technical issues, such as identifying fuel constituents and evaluating exposure pathways
 EPA looks forward to increasing collaboration and working with state, territorial, tribal, and other UST partners to achieve
 further progress in the tanks program. Our ultimate goal remains the same - protecting human health and the environment
 from petroleum releases.
 Petroleum Vapor Intrusion
 One of the UST program's continuing technical
 challenges is how best to address petroleum vapor
 intrusion (PVI) at LUST sites. In September 2009, EPA
 initiated a workgroup, comprised of state, federal, and
 industry members, to assess the state of science
 associated with PVI and provide input to assist federal
 and state programs as they pursue efficient, protective
 cleanups.

 EPA is developing PVI guidance, which we expect will
 be available to states in November 2012. The objective
 of the PVI guidance is to provide site remedial
 managers with practical direction and information on
 assessing and investigating the vapor intrusion pathway
 from petroleum contamination at LUST sites. This
 guidance will include an overall decision framework to
 consider the iterative information produced through site
 assessments, site characteristics,  and information
 generated through recommended vapor-specific
 inquiries.
Developing Regulations
EPA is revising the 1988 federal underground storage tank
regulation to establish federal requirements similar to key
portions of the 2005 Energy Policy Act provisions. These
requirements will apply to USTs in Indian country and in states
that do not have state program  approval. We are also
considering revisions to the existing requirements to increase
protection of human health and the environment, as well as
prevent UST releases and detect them quickly, if they occur.
Potential changes include:
    Adding secondary containment requirements for new and
    replaced USTs and piping
    Adding operator training requirements for UST system
    owners and operators
    Adding periodic operation and maintenance requirements
    for UST systems
    Removing certain deferrals
    Adding new release prevention and detection technologies
    Updating codes of practice
    Making editorial and technical corrections
    Updating state program approval requirements to
    incorporate these new changes
                                                        In 2010, we worked closely with states, tribes, industry, and
                                                        other stakeholders in developing the proposed regulation. In
                                                        summer 2011, we intend to publish a proposed regulation in
                                                        the Federal Register, followed by a final regulation that will
                                                        carry the UST program into the future.
            Cleaning up an Indian country site in
            Santo Domingo Pueblo, New Mexico

-------
                                                              March 2011
A Letter To UST Stakeholders

From  Carolyn Hoskinson, Director

EPA's  Office of Underground Storage Tanks

I think the adage by Hal Borland, an American author and journalist, aptly
describes FY 2010 in the UST program - "Year's end is neither an end nor a
beginning but a going on, with all the wisdom that experience can instill in us."  In
FY 2010, we gained much experience implementing the LUST  Recovery Act; we
learned a great deal from our stakeholders as we continued revising the federal
UST regulations; and we used our wisdom and experience as we continued to
implement Energy Policy Act requirements.

FY 2010 was productive for the UST program. February 2010  marked the one
year anniversary of the American Reinvestment and Recovery  Act, which
provided authority and money to assess and clean up underground storage tank
leaks in states, territories, and Indian country. August 2010 marked the fifth
anniversary of the Energy Policy Act and the first three-year on-site inspection
requirement for all active USTs.  September 2010 found UST program
stakeholders gathering in Boston for our 22nd annual conference that boasted the
largest attendance ever. All of these milestones, along with our routine work,
showcase the positive relationships of our UST partners and how we work closely
and cooperatively to achieve so much.

I acknowledge that some state and territorial UST programs struggled during
2010. I understand full well that many of you dealt with budget reductions  and
staff layoffs. Yet despite these challenges,  UST programs persevered with
energy and achieved much.  As of September 2010, EPA and our UST partners
closed over 1.7 million tanks; cleaned up more than 401,000 petroleum leaks; and
reduced the number of new releases from a high of almost 67,000 in 1990 to
approximately 6,300 in 2010. Today, tank systems are much less likely to leak
and cause significant environmental problems.

Irrespective of these accomplishments, many challenges still remain for the
national UST program. The remaining 597,000 active, federally-regulated  tanks
must be inspected every three years. All tank operators must be trained
according to established standards.  The backlog of just over 93,000 releases
needs to be addressed. We must continue  to ensure, in an accountable and
transparent manner, that LUST Recovery Act money is used appropriately and
expeditiously to assess and clean up UST releases.

Thank you to all our UST partners for your efforts to protect our environment and
human health from underground storage tank releases.  Your work and dedication
made 2010 a momentous year.  I look forward to working with you over the next
year.
                                     Community

                               Engagement And The

                                    UST Program
                              In December 2009, EPA's Office of Solid
                              Waste and Emergency Response
                              (OSWER) launched its Community
                              Engagement Initiative (CEI). to
                              encourage stakeholders' meaningful
                              participation in government decisions
                              regarding land cleanup, emergency
                              preparedness and response, and
                              hazardous substances and wastes
                              management. In May 2010. OSWER
                              issued its implementation plan, which
                              outlined specific actions to achieve the
                              CEI's goals and objectives.  As part of
                              this plan, EPA's Office of Underground
                              Storage Tanks (OUST) is working with
                              state implementing agencies and EPA
                              regional programs to meet these
                              commitments:


                                Review and analyze a sample of
                                 states' community engagement
                                 policies or processes and EPA's
                                 community engagement processes
                                 in Indian country
                                Determine the extent to which those
                                 processes enhance transparency,
                                 produce outcomes that are
                                 responsive to community concerns,
                                 commensurate to the circumstances
                                 of a release, and align with
                                 community needs and long-term
                                 goals
                                Create and sustain an ongoing
                                 dialogue with regions, states,  and
                                 tribes to promote and support
                                 effective community engagement
                                 processes

                              You can track OUST'sCEl efforts.
                                            Ufa	
                             To keep the public informed, EPA posts
                               mid and end of year activity reports
                                  that provide information on
                               compliance, releases, and cleanups
                                     across the country.
                            See the FY 2010 end of vear activitv report
  EPA-510-R-11 -001, March 2011
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
  Office of Underground Storage Tanks
For further information please contact:
        U.S. EPA/OUST
   1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
       Mail Code: 5401 P
     Washington, DC 20460
      Phone: 703-603-9900
       www.epa.gov/oust
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency

-------