Dayl
               Proceedings of
     JAPAN - UNITED STATES JOINT
   CONFERENCE ON DRINKING WATER
      QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND
        WASTEWATER CONTROL
                March 2009
Sponsored by:
3-EPA
             WATE
              FOUNDATION	
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
             XWERF
             Water Environment Research Foundation
             Collaboration. Innovation. Results.
    WATER
    RESEARCH
    FOUNDATION"
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE: OF WATER*

-------
         Japan - United States Joint Conference on
Drinking Water Quality Management and Wastewater Control
                       Agenda
                     March 2-5, 2009
Monday, March 2
Presentations Moderator:
Ms. Sally Gutierrez, Director, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, ORD, U.S. EPA
8:00
Continental Breakfast
Welcome and Introductions
9:00
9:20
9:30
9:40
Welcome
Ms. Pat Mulroy, General Manager, Southern Nevada Water Authority
Welcome
Ms. Sally Gutierrez, Director, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, ORD, U.S.
EPA
Welcome
Mr. Akira Takimura, Director, Office of Drinking Water Quality Management, Water
Supply Division, Health Service Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
Welcome
Mr. Osamu Fujiki, Director, Wastewater and Sludge Management Division, Water Quality
Control Department, National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management,
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Energy Efficiency in Water Treatment (Energy /Water Nexus)
9:50
10:15
10:40
10:55
11:20
Applying Life Cycle Assessment to Drinking Water Treatment,
Mr. Wataru Takashima, Director, Water Treatment Engineering Department, Japan
Water Research Center
Energy Management Strategies at Metropolitan Water District, Dr. Roy Wolfe,
Manager, Corporate Resources, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Break
National Project Leading to the Recycling Society with Sewage Sludge in Japan - LOTUS
Project -, Mr. Yoshihiro Morishima, Deputy Director, Japan Institute of Wastewater
Engineering Technology
The Urban Water Resource Recovery Center - An Emerging Vision for Future Municipal
Sewage Treatment, Mr. Joseph Zuback, President, Global Water Advisors, Inc.
Climate Change - Mitigation and Adaptation
11:45
12:10
12:35
13:35
Impacts of Climate Change on Water Quality and Measures Against Future Issues, Dr.
Yukihisa Hosaka, Director in Charge of Water Quality, Purification Division, Bureau of
Waterworks, Tokyo Metropolitan Government
Climate Change and Energy, Mr. Robert Renner, Executive Director, Water Research
Foundation (formerly AwwaRF)
Lunch
Climate Change Mitigation in Sewerage - Biomass and Energy Technologies, Mr.
Hiromasa Yamashita, Senior Researcher, Recycling Research Team, Material and

-------

14:00
Geotechnical Engineering Research Group, Public Works Research Institute
The Plan for Mitigation of Global Warming by Tokyo Metropolitan Sewerage Bureau -
Earth Plan 2004, Mr. Kiyoshi Inoue, Director, Planning and Coordination Division, Bureau
of Sewerage, Tokyo Metropolitan Government
Emerging Contaminants
(Endocrine Disrupters, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, etc.)
14:25
14:50
15:15
15:30
15:55
Emerging Contaminants in Drinking Water and Future Directions,
Dr. Mari Asami, Chief, Division of Water Quality Management,
Department of Water Supply Engineering, National Institute of Public Health
Occurrence and Relevance of Trace Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water, Dr. Shane
Snyder, R&D Project Manager, Applied Research and Development Center, Southern
Nevada Water Authority
Break
Status of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in River Water and
Wastewater and Evaluation of their Effects on Aquatic Organisms, Dr. Yutaka Suzuki,
Team Leader, Water Quality Research Team, Water Environment Research Group, Public
Works Research Institute
Emerging Contaminants - State of the Science in the U.S.A., Dr. Rhodes Trussell,
President, Trussell Technologies Inc
Distribution System Water Quality/Integrity
16:20
16:45
18:00
Reduction of Residual Chlorine in the Drinking Water in Yokohama City, Mr. Shigeo
Hiramoto, Manager, Northern Area Construction Division, Yokohama Waterworks
Bureau
Overview of Distribution System Water Quality Issues and Research Activities, Mr.
Chris Rayburn, Director, Research Management, Water Research Foundation (formerly
AwwaRF)
Reception Hosted by U.S.
Tuesday, March 3
Presentations Moderators:
Prof. Yasumoto Magara, Professor, Environmental Nano and Bio-engineering Research Center,
Hokkaido University
Dr. Masahiro Takahashi, Professor, Division of Field Engineering for Environment, Hokkaido University
8:00
Continental Breakfast
Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
9:00
9:25
Performance Assessment of Aging Drinking Water Infrastructure,
Mr. Yasuhiro Suzuki, Counselor, Japan Water Research Center
Sustainability: The Las Vegas Approach, Mr. Richard Holmes, Director of Environmental
Resources, Southern Nevada Water Authority

-------
9:50
10:15
10:40
10:55
11:20
11:45
Sewer Management in Japan - an Overview, Mr. Takashi Sakakibara, Head, Wastewater
and Sludge Management System Division, Water Quality Control Department, National
Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Transport and Tourism
Sustainable Water Infrastructure for the 21st Century, Dr. James Goodrich, Senior
Environmental Scientist, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, ORD, U.S. EPA
Break
Outline of Strategic Planning of Asset Management for Municipal Wastewater
Treatment Plants in Japan, Mr. Hiroki Matsui, Assistant Manager, Project Promotion
Division, Project Management Department, Japan Sewage Works Agency
One Utility's Approach to Wastewater Sustainability, Ms. Karen Pallansch, General
Manager, Alexandria Sanitation Authority
Current State and New Technologies for CSO Control in Japan, Mr. Hideki Hayashi,
Senior Research Engineer, Japan Institute of Wastewater Engineering Technology
"Water Safety Plan" Approach
12:10
12:35


Recent Progress in WSP Application in Japan, Dr. Shoichi Kunikane, Professor, Institute
for Environmental Sciences, University of Shizuoka
Lunch
Afternoon Tours
Reception Hosted by Las Vegas Valley Water District
Wednesday, March 4
Presentations Moderators:
Dr. Audrey Levine, National Program Director for Drinking Water, ORD, US EPA
Dr. Daniel Weltering, Director of Research, Water Environment Research Foundation
8:00
Continental Breakfast
Water Reuse/ Indirect Potable Reuse
9:00
9:25
9:50
10:15
10:40
10:55
Water Reuse in Japan, Mr. Mizuhiko Minamiyama, Head, Wastewater and Sludge
Management Division, Water Quality Control Department, National Institute for Land
and Infrastructure Management, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Current Status, Trends, and Future Challenges of Water Reuse in the U.S., Mr. Wade
Miller, Executive Director, WateReuse Association and Foundation
Source Water Protection of Yodo River and Water Quality Management in Osaka
Municipal Waterworks, Mr. Masayuki Miwa, Manager in Charge of Research, Water
Examination Laboratory, Osaka Municipal Waterworks Bureau
Potable Reuse for Water Supply Sustainability: Critical Today - Essential Tomorrow,
Mr. Tom Richardson, Principal, RMC Water and Environment
Break
Reuse of Water and Biosolids in Sakai City, Ms. Kumi Koyama, Chief, Project Team,
Sewerage Management Division, Sewerage Department, Waterworks and Sewerage
Bureau, Sakai City
Membrane Bioreactors
11:20
State of the Art of MBR Technology and Its Perspective in Japan, Dr. Hiroki Itokawa,

-------

11:45

12:10
12:35
13:35


14:00
14:25
14:50
15:15
15:30

15:55
16:20
16:45
17:10
18:00
Researcher, Research and Technology Development Division, Japan Sewage Works
Agency
Investigation of Membrane Bioreactor Effluent Water Quality and Technology, Ms.
Joan Oppenheimer, Vice President, MWH Technical Strategy and Research
Desalination
Status and Challenges for Desalination in the U.S., Mr. Andrew Shea, USA Development
Director, Acciona Agua Corporation
Lunch
Desalination Plant with Unique Methods in FUKUOKA,
Mr. Akira Shimokawa, Director, Facilities Division, FUKUOKA District Waterworks Agency
Pathogens/Microbes
Detection Methods of Enteric Viruses in a Large Volume of Water, Dr. Hiroyuki
Katayama, Associate Professor, Department of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of
Engineering, the University of Tokyo
Future Directions for Monitoring Pathogen Indicators/Surrogates: Linkages to Water
Quality Management and Public Health Protection, Dr. Audrey Levine, National
Program Director for Drinking Water, ORD, US EPA
Research for Pathogens in Water Environment and the Countermeasures in Sewerage,
Mr. Seiichiro Okamoto, Team Leader, Recycling Research Team, Material and
Geotechnical Engineering Research Group, Public Works Research Institute
Break
Future Design Techniques for Chemical Disinfection, Dr. Charles Haas, LD Betz
Professor of Environmental Engineering and Head, Civil, Architectural & Environmental
Engineering Department, Drexel University
Watershed Management
Measure for the Water Quality Improvement in Dam Basin, Mr. Hiroyuki Nakajima,
Chief, Management Section, Kizugawa Dams Integrated Operation & Management
Office, Japan Water Agency
Management of the Impact of Earthquake on Sewerage Services, Mr. Osamu Fujiki,
Director, Wastewater and Sludge Management Division, Water Quality Control
Department, National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, Ministry of
Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Understanding of Pollutant Behavior in River Basin, Mr. Yuji Okayasu, Senior
Researcher, Water Quality Research Team, Water Environment Research Group, Public
Works Research Institute
Closing Remarks/Meeting Summation
Reception Hosted by Japanese

-------
          Welcome and Introductions
                Ms. Patricia Mulroy
                  General Manager
           Southern Nevada Water Authority
             (Presentation not available)

                Ms. Sally Gutierrez
                      Director
    National Risk Management Research Laboratory
          Office of Research and Development
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             (Presentation not available)

                Mr. Akira Takimura
                      Director
     Office of Drinking Water Quality Management
     Water Supply Division, Health Service Bureau
         Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare

                Mr. Osamu Fujiki
                      Director
     Wastewater and Sludge Management Division
          Water Quality Control Department
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

-------
Opening Remarks
 Current Challenges and
    Policy Directions of
  Water Supply in Japan
       March 2, 2009 Japan-U.S. Joint Conference
            Akira TAKIMURA
   Director, Office of Drinking Water Quality Management,
      Water Supply Division, Health Service Bureau,
    Ministry on Health, Labour & Welfare (MHLW), Japan

-------
Water Supply in  Japan
  Our Basic Concepts on Drinking Water

        Water as Public Goods
     Public bodies are responsible for securing clean and ample water supply

       "Supply of water is directly related to the daily life of the people and
       indispensable for the maintenance of their health"
                                         - The Water Works Law, Japan
           120 Years History of Modern Water Supply System
           Rapid Pervasion during the Past 50 Years

           POpUlatJOn Served! 97.3 % (Household connection) /1 00 % (Total improved access)
           Very Low Leakage Rate : 7%
           Safe Water : Drinkable without Boiling
           Promotion of Disaster Resistance
             Based on the Experiences of Severe Earthquakes
  I—y Now providing one of the World's Highest Water Supply Service,
      But can we continue to meet the people's expectation ?

-------
          The Waterworks Vision" 2004
                  (revised in 2008)
^Established in June 2004
     • As the National Vision of Policy Directions for future water supply in
  Japan
    •  Target period is IQyears,
      on long-term perspective of the middle of 21st century
4First review-process (2007-2008)
     • By the Expert Committee for follow-up  (Headed by Prof. Magara)
     • Invitation of public opinions
     Revised in July 2008
     •  Newly identified "Priority Items" of measures
     for 5 main policies
         1. Safety, 2. Stability, 3. Sustainability,
         4. Environment, 5. Globalization

-------
 Ideal water supply
      service
    Water supply
 system that strives
   to be a leading
 player in the world


Setting higher goals and
making steady progress

 Service that customers
are always satisfied with
    and are willing to
       support
 Providing a world-
  class service in
  various contexts
 < Stability >
  < Sustainability >
   < Environment >
   < Globalization >
                                  policy
   Policy objectives
1)  Safety
   Supply people with safe and
   good-tasting tap water

2)  Stability
   A stable supply of water for
   domestic use anytime,
   anywhere

3)  Sustainability
   • Strengthening the basis of
    the water supply system
    taking local characteristics
    into account
   • Preserving and developing
    practices and skills
    accumulated in the water
    supply service
   • Improving the water supply
    service based on customer
    needs

4)  Environment
   Contribute to environmental
   conservation

5)  Globalization
   Contribute to the world by
   transferring our experiences
   to other countries
Measures
                                    Promotion of
                                      measures
(1) Strengthening the
   basis of the water
   supply system

(2) Ensuring a safe and
   convenient water
   supply

(3) Improving disaster
   prevention

(4) Improving
   environmental and
   energy measures

(5) International
   contributions in the
   water supply service
   through international
   cooperation

-------
  (1) Sustainability :   Strengthening the

       basis of the Water Supply Systems


> Sustainable water supply system with optimum basis;

      Operational size & forms, human resource and facilities


   •  Integration to the wider-area operation of water supply systems
      (hardware and/or software)


   •  Optimum forms of management; public-private / public-public
      partnership, with transparent evaluation system for operational
      performance


   •  Action fpr inheritance of technological know-how to the next
      generations


   •  Systematic renewal of aged facilities with the Asset Management
      approach

-------
(2) Safety

   How about the Tap Water Quality ?

    •  Source water quality has been improved
    •  The overall situation is rather good
          (more than 99.9% satisfying DWQS)

                •*Recent Opinion poll indicates that people are

                  - Content for all use : 50%

                   - Content for other than drinking : 40%

                   - Drinking tap water directly : 37%
  S) Current state depends on continuous efforts
  © Further safety is expected
  ® Increasing awareness on comfort for drinking purpose
         Require more efforts for reliable tap water quality!
                (and also for effective "public relations"!)

-------
Drinking Water Quality Standards  in Japan
    Being kept up-to-date
    by a "rolling revision"
         ('
  Coir plementary Items
         (27 items)
 Items for Further Study
 •  Items that the Water Works Law
 (§20) requires water suppliers to
 monitor and meet standards
 •  Detected in purified water over
 10% of the health based value
 •  31 items for human health, 20 items for
 Deteriorate
•  MHLW requests to monitor and manage
(non-legally binding)
•  Risk assessments are provisional or
detected at few points
•  15 items for human health (incl. 101 pesticides
  12 items for Deteriorate
   Risk assessments are provisional
   Detected level and frequency in purified water is unclear
   Further study, information and knowledge are needed

-------
           Up-to-date of DWQSs

            by Rolling Revision

Discussion Points
1. Revision of Health based value
  •  According to the Latest Scientific Knowledge,
    Risk Assessment of Food Safety commission and WHO etc.
                                           DWQSs
_                      .......             (Slitems)
2. Detection Rate in purified Water          *    ^
  -  Feedback of Monitoring Results          Complementary items
                                          (27items)
                                     Items for Further Study
3. Candidate Substances                  (40items)
  • Buildup Database of Potential Items
  - Add to "Items for Further Study"
   (emerging pollutants: ex. Perchlorate, NDMA, PFOS/PFOA —)

-------
(2) Safety :   Ensuring of Safe and Convenient

    Water Supply

>  DWQSs and "output monitoring" is indispensable .

>  Keeping good operational process from source to tap

      with hazardous analysis and multiple-barrier

      approach is also important.

 •  Improvement of water quality management by integrated
    approach from source water to tap
     ("Water Safety Plan" approach is ongoing)
 •  Improvement of water quality management measures for
    unregulated and small-scale facilities


 •  Improvement of reliability of water service installation (in-building
    water supply pipes and equipment)


 •  Introduction of advanced technologies for water quality
    management

-------
(3) Stability :   Improving disaster prevention

 > Strengthen the anti-seismic measures
      at the hardware / software side, pre / post disaster etc.

(4) Environment:  Improving environmental
     and energy conservation measures

 > Win-Win approach to cost effectiveness and
      environmental conservation in long-term perspective
      (ex. mitigation and  adaptation for climate change)
(5) Globalization :  International contribution
     with regard to water supply service

 > Int. cooperation to support the MDG achievement
      under public-private partnership

-------
       Local Waterworks Vision
In order to attain the goals of National Waterworks Vision ;
   >Each Local Water suppliers are recommended to
         develop their own "Local Waterworks Vision"
         based on the assessment of current situation
         and future prospects

   >MHLW provided the Guideline for LWWV in 2005
       225 LWWVs were developed as of Dec. 2008
58% of pop. served
by Water Suppliers
72% of Max. daily
volume served by Bulk
Water Suppliers

-------

  for your attention and cooperation!
Wishing for fruitful discussions
     on this Japan-U.S. conference
    toward safety and sustainabilityi
               END

-------
Japan-U.S. Joint Conference
on Drinking Water Quality
Management and Wastewater
Control
Monday, March 2, 2009
Challenges
Works  in Ja
Sewag

-------
Beijing Olympic Games in 2008
Tokyo Olympic Games in 1964

-------
                            Sumida River, Now
Heavily Polluted
Sumida River (a.1960)

-------
           Progress  in Sewerage Development and
                  the International  Comparison
   1QO
   BQ
   40
   20
            Water supply
Ribilc Sewerage
                                             Coverage Rate or
                                             sewered Population
                                    Couerage Hale o( Sswerad Population
                                    with Acfcnced Traahneot
                                          100
                                         *
                                        CJ
                                          2C-
                                              13.2

                                                                         E7
                                                  Sweden  Holland Germany Canada America England
Change in Japan's coverage rates of population served  Worldwide ranking of countries by coverage rate of sew-
with water supply and public sewerage             ered population

-------
Symptom of Dying Tokyo Bay
       Source: Dr. Ando, Tokyo Metropolis

-------
Control of Combined
Sewer Overflows
The Project "Revive Osaka, the Water
Capital" involves the development of
"Kitahama-Osaka Reservoir" to stop
the combined sewer overflows in usual
rainfall event.
                                      IKitahama-Osaka Storage Pipeline
                                             T#
                                               *"
                                                  KiWvrairfp
                       5 m In dMrnttr K ebout 47 sm
                    (Stccage capacity. 140,000
Sov/or outkats
                                       5ewaq,e treatmwn plants 12
                                             ;:iErt#
                                            ttntkim    46
                                            >/Jfl>
                                       Overftow seww outlets  56
                                                       I Sewer Outfalte

                                                            -
                                            served by a
                                         sewer system fti#£
                                         Aroa served by a separate
                                        J sower system ^5&^l*i
                                                    Btonmyate-r Storage Pipelme

-------
  Ever-worsening
  Inundation  due to
  Torrential Rain
               ifS-l irnes,')f«a- Hi fiscal 2CC4 (Ihs mosl Iraquent in fri« paslf
 Frequency ol praoipilafcon
 ftxwaang 50 mm/notir
 HffiSOdnm h

 SCO
 100
      — *' S S *. w ® -j S H- S — ' 35" S «.' !5i S -i«
                         HO KJ ro ty f\> l^> fO Kij
   63 54 65 65 57 58 58 SO 61 S2a3 HI 2 3 I 5 6 7 8 5 JIO II 1213 1453 1516 1' 18 j
Recent increase in the frequency of precipitation exceeding
50 mm/hour
Underground shopping arcade
              Fukuoka, 1999
                                            Shinjuku, Tokyo, 2004

-------
         Emerging needs of the Asset Management
Deteriorated sewer pipe
Bus stuck in a cave
Cave-in on a sidewalk
                    Collapse of Road Surface

-------
    Impact of Climate Change on
 Annual Precipitation Projected by
       Multimodel Ensemble

Change in the annual mean precipitation (mm/day)
                            Greenhouse
                            Gas Emissions
                            from Sewage
                            Works
                                                 Older* (CH4|: 0.3%
                                                     Tow
                                                   $#IW[| nillia i tiais al
                                                    C0S(R*M JOMf
                                                   Power ccnsiirnplian by
                                                   pump slfllioiw (CO?)T 8%
          60E
120E
120W
60W -0.
                       J	\	1	L
     -1  -0.5 -0.2 -0.1 -O,03  0  0.05 0.1  0.2  0.5   I
   (Meteorological Research Institute, MLIT)

-------
           Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse
  Reclaimed Water for Water Shortage!
  jAgua reciclada para la escasez!
   Clean Water Back!
iVuelve el agua limpia!
 la
                         Tokyo Metropolis
                        Metropolis de Tokio
                       Reclaimed Water
                       Aqua reciclada
           Membrane filtration
          I'ituailo vo> membrana
                             Almost Drinkable!
   Advanced wastewater treatment
TratamtentD avanzado de ayuas residuate*
            Water cycle by technology
           Ciclo de agua por tecnologia
               Old waterway (Dried up)
                 Vie jo canal seco
                                                    Stream back I
                                                    jVuelve el rio!
                                                                            reclaimed water
                                                                        tutfitnJo en agua >
                                                  on Wastewater Treatment Plant
                                                en Planla de imtamienlo de aguas rcsiduales

-------
Expanding  Possibilities
of Biosolid  Utilization
                                                        Sludge Composting
                   Roadbed
                    material
                    SlflStf
Water permeable
   blocks
                                                         Soil quality
                                                         improvement
                                                          materials
                            Sludge Carbides
Lightweight
aggregate
                                            Gardening soil
                                                  Granulation
 Soil improvemwit
   material
                                                      Electricity   Heating
                                               True Chart, of Sludge Resources
       a«w5».^B w i«* s In Jspno iooi

-------
Quantitative Risk Assessment of Pathogens
  Reduction
  during treatment
  Environmental
  reduction
  Exposure
  frequency
  Mortality
  /Morbid itv/rate
                     Microbial cone, in sewage
Inactivation by
Disinfection, etc
                      Microbial cone.
                      in reclaimed water
 Ingested water
 amount
                      Ingested microbial #
                       Annual Infection Risk
 )ose-response of
 specific pathogen
                    Annual disease/death Risk

-------
             Chemical risk to
         human?/ecosystems?
1000001
10000.
 1000.
"X"
 T
 n 7T
_,-o Chemicals in reclaimed water after biological treatment
                                    \%
                                    Y^ 3? Q-  LLJ
    Detergents
          w ^ '
          o E
          1 o
          i- "S
          Y
                              ^.|s l< || g
                              >^^ ™ ™  S < c
                              C — P S  J^ Oi
                              QJ  m
    o _o _o _o
 LJ 'F 4— C O o O
 c E 2 =^ £c -o
E| - g-- §-- -
CD ^- C c
« 1-^
           Endocrine disrupters L
           Female hormones
                         Pharmaceuticals
                                 (Takada et al, 2004)
•High attention to nitrogen are needed for human health
•Further attention may be necessary for risk of remaining
unregulated chemicals

-------
   How to address the Global
   Issues of Urban Sanitation
PAKISTAN
                                                        Ghaziabad
                                                      Hindon river
                                                      Drain

                                                      Sewerane treatment nlant
                                    Aara nanal
                                             YAMUNA

-------
Thank you for your attention!

-------
Energy Efficiency in Water Treatment
       (Energy/Water Nexus)

-------
              Energy Efficiency in Water Treatment
                    (Energy/Water Nexus)
Applying Life Cycle Assessment to Drinking Water
                       Treatment
                   Mr. Wataru Takashima
        Director, Water Treatment Engineering Department
                 Japan Water Research Center

-------

-------

-------


-------
1 I

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------

-------
    [Treatment]
                            Chemicals
               Coagulant         Intermediate Cl
(Abstraction)
           Raw
           water
Flocculation
+ Sedimentation
Sand-filtration
               (Transmission)
          [Discharge]
                             Washing
                           waste water
    Thickening
                                 [Common]

                                                        Electric equip.
                             lent)

-------
Law water

Flocclation

Sand-filter

Chemicals

Discharge

Electricity
            0
20
    LC-E  (10MJ/58y)
40           60          80
100
120
                                                  Construction
                                                  Operation
                                                  Renewal
                                                  Disposal

-------
                                                                                          -
                                        LC-C02 (10Kg-C02/58y)
            0123456
Law water

Flocclation

Sand- filter

Chemicals

Discharge

Electricity
789
  Construction
  Operation
  Renewal
  Disposal

-------
                                  '58y)
20
              40
                           60
                                         80
                                                      100
                                                                    120
Raw water
Flocculation
Sediment atio
n
Sand
filtration

Chemicals
feeding
Sludge
treatment
Electric
Receiving well

Mixing basin
Buffle type flocculation
Horizontal- flow
sedimentation basin
with inclined plate settler

Sand filters
Feeding equipments
Drainage basin
Thickner
Receiving. .&-tr.aDs:i:Qx.mer
Monitoring & contorl
	 egipments 	

Receiving well
Pi pes. Valves
Floor pumps
\
Sub total ID
Mixing basin 1 	
Mixers
Flocculation basin
Weir
^
Sedimentation basin L 	
Inclined plate settlor IN
Scraper II
Discharge trough
Sludge equipments



1

II

Sub total f H
Sand filters
Discharge trough
Filter media 1
r

Collector 1 	
Inlet equipments L
Discharge equipments 1 1
w/ashing equipments | II
Pi pes, Valves III
E|ectri.c.....equipmeoLs. 	 H. 1 1
Sub total 1
Feeding chamber
Sodium hypochlorite
Coagul ant ( PAC1 1





1

I


1

i i n
i

1
Pipes.Valves L
Plectrfc. squipmQots, II n
Sub total
Dranage basin
Pumps
Pi pes Valves
Racks
Thickner
Sludge scraper
Pumps
Pi pes. Valves
Racks
Sub total
Receiving & transformer
Monitoring equipments

,,l
1

,1
I
II


_l 	
1 1,

Insrumentation 1
Generator
Sub total M
i i
i


n
T~

1


1 H

i i
• Coi
•Op(
1=1 Rer
•Dis
nst ruction
3rat ion
lewal
oosal

-------
                                                                                               LC

                                                                                                3
                                                                 (10bKg-C02/58y)
                                                                   4         5
 Raw water
Flocculation
Sediment atio
   Sand
 -filtration
 Chemicals
  feeding
  Sludge
 treatment
  Electric
                   Receiving well
                    Mixing basin
               Buffle type flocculation
                  Horizontal- flow
                sedimentation basin
             with inclined plate settler
                    Sand filters
                Feeding equipments
                   Drainage basin
                     Thickner
              Receiving & transformer
                Monitoring & contorl
               	eqipments	
                                        Receiving well
Pipes, Valves
                                        Oo.Q.r....p.umps.
                                          	Sub total
                                        Mixing basin
                                        Mixers
                                        Flocculation basin
                                        Weir
Sedimentation basin
Inclined plate settler
Scraper
Discharge trough
                                        Sludge equipments
                                        Sand filters
                                        Discharge trough
                                        Filter media
                                        Collector
                                        Inlet equipments
                                        Discharge equipments
                                        washing equipments
                                        Pi pes. Valves
                                        He.c..t.riG....e.q.uipme.nts.	
                                        	Sub total
                                        Feeding chamber
                                        Sodium hypochlorite
CoaqulanUPACh
                                        Pi pes. Valves
                                       	Sub total
                                        Dranaoe basin
                                        Pumps
                                        Pi pes, Valves
                                        Racks
                                        Thickner
Sludge scraper
                                        Pumps
                                        Pi pes, Valves
                                        Racks
                                        Eie.c..t.rj.c....e.qujprTie.nt.s.
                                        	Sub total
 Receiving & transformer
Monitoring equipments
                                        Insru mentation
                                       	Sub total
Construction

Operation

Renewal

Disposal
                                                                                                                      J

-------
[Treatment ]
 [Discharge]
                                 Membrane
                           Chemical
                           tank
                                     Chemical washing
                          Neutralization
                          Reducing
    Chemical
    Waste tank
                       Waste water tank
    Thickener
                         Washing
                        water tank
                                                                          Q
                                   (Transmission)
                       Sodium
                       hypochlorite
                                                                  (Sewer pipe)
                               r
                      Coagulant
                      Reducing agent
Conditioning
                                                                     Electric eqip.
                                Buildings

-------
           0
  LC-C02  (10Kg-C02/58y)
6      8       10      12      14      16      18
Mem brane
D ischarge
E lectricity
Building
                              Construction
                              Operation
                              Renewal
                              Disposal

-------
                                                                                     LC-C02 (10DKg-C02/58y)
                                                                          2345
Ozone
                        les
              Exhaust ozone
                                     Contact basin
                                  Ozon generator unit
                                       •compressor
                                    Heat exchanger
Cooling water pump
                                 Exahaust ventilation fan
                                    Instrumentation
                                    Monitoring panel
•Construction
D Operation
D Renewal

-------
LC-C02 (10Kg-C02/58y)
            8
10
12






Adsorption basin







Adsorptionbasin
Trough
Avtivated carbon
Filter media
Collecting equipments
Inlet equipments
Discharge equipments
Vteir
VMiinq equipments
Pipesyalves
Exhaust ozone facilities
Incidental Facilities
Boilding
Total
I







1



[
	













1 1












































Construction

u Operation
n n
u Renewal

\a ) QrVYQ?)
MOjJUOUl






-------
    [Treatment]
            Coagulant
           Chemicals
                                                                         Post Cl
                             Intermediate Cl

(Abstraction)
                   locculatioii
                   edimentati
m
   Others
(Intermediate
   pumps)
                                        Sand-filtration
                                                      (Transmil
                             Waste water tank
     [Discharge]
                             J.
                                                              [Common]
                             Thickener
                                    Electric eqip.
            (Sludge treatment)!

-------
                                             (10
0
20
                                             m
                        D

-------
                                          LC-C02
                    Construction    a Operation     D Renewal     D Disposal
Membrane HI.
    Sand HI.
            0
5
10
15
20
25
                                         106Kg-C02/58Years

-------

-------
Co

-------

-------
           Energy Efficiency in Water Treatment
                 (Energy/Water Nexus)
Energy Management Strategies at Metropolitan
                  Water District
                   Dr. Roy L. Wolfe
              Manager, Corporate Resources
      Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

-------
    Energy Management Strategies
                   at
      Metropolitan Water District

            Roy L Wolfe, Ph.D.

Japan - U.S. Joint Conference on Drinking Water
  Quality Management and Wastewater Control
               March 2, 2009

-------
            Topics
California Water & Energy
                    ^j j
Energy Management at Water Agencies
Metropolitan Water District
Energy Management Program
Next Steps

-------
              California
                 2006
Gross domestic product $1.6    (
trillion (11.5% of U.S. GDP)
                             \
Population exceeded 37.4 million

State added 462,000 residents
(1.2% growth rate)

Expected population in 2040:
more than 54 million

Largest growth in Central Valley

Population growth stresses energy
system

-------
      California Water &  Energy
Eight large water projects

Northern California has 2/3
of state's precipitation;
Southern California has 2/3
of the population
Energy demand grows with
water demand
Water use consumes
significant amounts of
electricity
State Water
Project
                   >s Angeles
                    educt

-------
     California Gross System Power
                    2007
      Nuclear
       14.8%
Natural Gas
  45.2%
  Renewable
    11.8%
Large Hydroelectric
     11.7%
  Coal
 16.6%
         California Total = 302,072 GWh

-------
California's Initiative to Reduce
  Greenhouse Gas Emissions
           AB32
      Reduce state-wide
  greenhouse gas emissions
    to 1990 levels by 2020

-------
     Energy Management
Importance to Water Agencies
Cost

Energy intensive water treatment
technologies
Greenhouse gas emissions related to
energy generation

-------
            Electric  Price Volatilit
                                     2006-2013
                                Projected AGR = 5 -20%
      California Historical Retail Electricity Rates
             1996-2005
          Historic AGR = 3%
           (Annual Growth Rate)             > -
•t 12
ra 11
              _l	l_
                                          	i	i	i_
     1996   1998   2000   2002
 2004
Year
2006   2008  2010   2012
                                    Source: Energy Information Administration

-------
   Energy Intensive Water
   Treatment Technologies

Conventional Treatment (CT)
Ultraviolet Disinfection
Ozone
Microfiltration/Ultrafiltration
Nanofiltration/Reverse Osmosis

-------
    Energy Intensive Water
    Treatment Technologies
   Est. Increase in Annual Energy Cost (100 MOD)
900%
800%
700%
600%
500%
400%
300%
200%
100%
              Source: AWWA Research Foundation

-------
Metropolitan Water District
  of Southern California
           6 counties; 5,200 Sq. Miles

           18+ million people

           Regional economy: $600+
           Billion

           Projected growth:
           -220,000 people / year

           Metropolitan provides about
           half of Southern California's
           supply

-------
                                LOS ANGELES
                                 QUEDUCTS
STATE WATE
  PROJECT
    METROPOLITAN
    WATER DISTRICT
    SERVICE AREA
                      LOCAL
                                  AQUED

-------
Banks Pumping Plant
                  '••
EdmonstonPumping Plant
     uiHiiiiimj -I
State Water Project

• Completed and Online 1972
• Owned and operated by Calif.
  Dept. of Water Resources
• 29 Water Contractors
  (including Metropolitan)
• Facilities include:
   - 17 pumping plants
   - 8 hydroelectric power plants
   - 29 dams and reservoirs
   - 675 miles of canals, tunnels, and
     pipelines
   - Highest lift: 1,900 ft (Edmonston)

-------
Intake Pumping Pla
Hinds Puffing Plant
        ",
         ^flAjyJ?.'...'
  Colorado River
     Aqueduct

Completed and Online 1941
Owned and operated by
Metropolitan
Facilities include:
 - 5 pumping plants
 - 2 reservoirs
 - 242 miles of canals, tunnels,
  and buried conduits
 - Highest lift: 1,600ft

-------
SWP West Branch
                     MWD  System
                                                   2.6 Billon Gal / Day
                                                   Treatment Capacity
                                       SWP East Branch
                                               SAN BERNARDINO
                                                          Colorado River
                                                              Aqueduct
         sen 1972
                   LOS ANGE
                            Weymouth (19,4
                               iemer(1963)
                                                         RIVERSIDE


                                                       Skinner (1976)
                                      SAN OIEGC
Major MWD Facilities:
242 mile aqueduct
775 miles of pipelines
7 major pumping stations
5 water treatment plants
16 hydroelectric plants

-------
Diemer Treatment Plant
Robert

-------
Water-Related Energy Use In California
          % of Total GWH (2006)
    Total California Electricity  Water-Related
      Use = 294,865 GWH         Use
                                   • Other Uses
                                    End Users
                            0.4%
                                   • State Water
                                    Project

                                   • MWD

-------
Metropolitan's Net Power Costs (2007)
                         CRA
                        $21.3 M
                       1.4 M MWh
                        713 TAP
  Other
  $8.6M
0.08 M MWh
            SWP
           $213.5 M
           4.4 M MWh
            52 MAP
             Total Power Cost = $243.4 M
           Total Net Energy Used = 5.9 M MWh

-------
 Energy Management Program
            Drivers
Climate change
Greenhouse gas emissions
Risk mitigation
Cost control

-------
Metropolitan's Energy Mgmt Program

•  Goal:

  -  Design, Construct and Operate facilities in an
     Energy Efficient, Cost-Effective and Sustainable
     Manner

•  Strategies:
  -  Reduce GHG emissions
     Improve energy efficiency and energy
     conservation
  -  Manage power resources in the most cost-
     effective manner

  -  Implement renewable energy projects

-------
    Reduce Greenhouse Gas
           Emissions
Increase number of hybrid vehicles in
sedan fleet
Improve boiler operations & efficiency
at administration buildings

-------
Improve Energy Efficiency &
   Promote Conservation
Retrofit lighting systems
Install Variable Frequency Drives
Promote energy and sustainability

-------
    Manage Power Resources
MWD Small Hydro Power
Plants
- Energy sold through power
  contracts
- Maximize power generation
CRA Energy Resources
- Hoover Dam (supplies ~ 50%
  CRA power)
- Parker Dam (supplies ~ 20%
  CRA power)

-------
    Renewable Energy
      Technologies
Hydroelectric
Solar
Wind

-------
      Hydroelectric Generation
16 HEPs located
throughout distribution
system

122-MW dependable
capacity

523,000 MWh generated
(2006)

Generated $26M revenue
(2006)

All energy contracted or
sold on wholesale market

HEP Expansion
Assessment completed
            Generator
Existing
Pressure
Control
Structure
        YORBA LINDA
     HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT

-------
  Consumption & Renewable Generation
600,000
500,000
400,000
            Treatment Plants, OC-88, and DVL
             MWD Small Hydro Generation
300,000
200,000
100,000
                       Calendar Year

-------
 Consumption & Renewable Generation
3,000,000
2,500,000
•-Treatment Plants, OC-88, and DVL
HVIWD Small Hydro Generation
 CRA Energy Used
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
 500,000
                       Calendar Year

-------
                Solar Power
First 1-MW project in construction
-  On-line April 2009
-  Capital Cost: $8-10 Million
-  Expect $5 Million rebate through California Solar Initiative
-  Will generate 2,400 MWh / year (approx. 22% of annual use)
Studies  underway for an additional 10-MW at various
facilities
   Assessing Capital acquisition vs. Power Purchase Agreements

-------
               Wind Power
Colorado River Aqueduct
 - Meteorological data collected
 - Analysis indicates average wind
  speed too low for economical plant
 - Further studies planned
Monitor wind turbine design
progress & efficiency
improvements

-------
Issues Impacting Development
     of Renewable Energy
 Cost
 Transmission capacity & reliability
 Intermittent/variable nature of solar
 PV and wind energy
 Technological advances

-------
  Renewable/Low Emission
           Power Costs
$9,000

$8,000

$7,000

$6,000

$5,000

$4,000

$3,000

$2,000

$1,000

  $0
     Solar PV   Solar  Clean Coal Nuclear
           Thermal
Wind  Natural Gas

-------
   Next Steps for Metropolitan

Continue energy efficiency &
conservation activities
Continue implementation of cost effective
Renewable Energy projects:
- Solar PV
- Hydroelectric Power Plant Expansions
-Wind Energy

-------
        Next Steps (cont'd.)
Develop Board policy to address
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
-Short-term: 25% carbon reduction at all retail
  energy facilities by 2013
-Intermediate: 100% carbon reduction at all
  retail energy facilities by 2020
- Long-term: 100% carbon reduction at all
  retail and wholesale energy facilities by 2020

-------

-------
    Roy L Wolfe, Ph.D.
Metropolitan Water District
  rwolfe@mwdh2o.com

-------
            MWD Carbon Footprint

      Colorado River Aqueduct & Water

              Treatment Facilities
  80o,oocEstmiated



  700,000
Q) 600.000


>
'5 500,000

cr
U4
^ 400,000

O

^ 300,000

O

J2 200,000

O

.O 100,000
         Total Emissions
1990  2006  2008  2010
2012
Year
                               2014   2016   2018   2020

-------
    Colorado River Apportionmen
                 (Million acre - feet)
               Upper Basin States

               Lower Basin States
 Wyoming

1.04
         California
                         Arizona
Apportionment
                                        New
                                   .84  Mexico
                     Mexico

-------
         MWD  Electricity Use/Cost
             Calendar Year 2007
   Other
   0.08M
SWP
4.4M
               1.52
Other
$8.6M
  SWP
$213.5M
.52 MAF
  MWh
713 TAP
    Total Electricity
       5.9M MWh
       $21.3...
      713 TAF
              Total Cost
               $243.4M
                                           Other includes:
                                          Treatment Plants
                                                •USHQ
                                              • OC-88 PP
                                           • Wadsworth PP
                                           •Misc Facilities

-------
Southern California's Water Supplies
          Water
          Project
          Imports
             Colorado
               River
             Aqueduct
              Imports

-------
           California Water Today


State Water
Project
          Local
                       west deliveries on record
                       eles
                   •jedu
                                     ear drought
   on record
Fishery conflicts
 cause cutbacks

-------
            Energy Efficiency in Water Treatment
                  (Energy/Water Nexus)
National Project Leading to the Recycling Society
           with Sewage Sludge in Japan
                 -LOTUS Project-

                 Mr. Yoshihiro Morishima
                    Deputy Director
   Japan Institute of Wastewater Engineering Technology (JIWET)

-------
National Project Leading to the Recycling
  Society with Sewage Sludge in Japan
            LOTUS Project
       Japan Institute of Wastewater
      Engineering Technology (JIWET)

             Yoshihiro
             Morishima

-------
Background of LOTUS Project.
    Biomass Nippon Strategy

    Kyoto Protocol

    Problem in the sewage
       - Lack of sludge dumping site
       - Increasing cost for sludge recycling
      MLIT started a new R&D Project in 2005
              LOTUS Project

       Chief purpose of technology development
      Cost reduction for various productions and
      energy utilizations from sewage sludge

-------
 Development target (cost)
1.Sludge Zero-Discharge technology
  enabling to recycle all sewage sludge at a
  lower cost than its disposal.
         Dewatered sludge  : 16,000 yen/t or less
         Incineration ash
2.Green Energy Source technoloi
  enabling to generate power from sewage
  sludge and other biomass such as garbage at
  a lower cost than commercial electric power
  cost in Japan.
                9.32 yen/kWh or less

-------
 The calculation  method of the cost
(existing equipment
(b) remodeling cost
(d) increment of the running
   cost
(e) decrease of the fuel cost
   by the energy recoveries
 new equipment
 (a) building cost
 (c) running cost
recycling product
(P*Q) value of produced
    energy
(f) sell income for products
  from sewage sludge and
  others
(g) recycling cost
 |disposal cost
 (Z) before introduction
 (z) after introduction
 others
|(h) income for the disposal of
   the other biomass
|(i) others

-------
 Development technology
     7 technologies in LOTUS Project

         3 technologies for  Zero-Discharge target
         3 technologies for  Energy Source target
         1 technology for both targets
All technologies have accomplished their development
targets, and this project finished in fiscal 2007.

-------
       1. Production of biosolid fuel from sewage sludge (Zero-Discharge)
          Verification test plant
Dewatered
sludge piping
          •>

 Dewatered
 sludge
 hopper
 chamber

Deodori-  «
zation
furnace
Treatment capacity
  1.7 t -cake/day
                                 i
 Dried sludge
 circulation
 elevator

Sludge mixer


 Sludge dryer
                                                               Heat
                                                               medium
                                                               heater

-------
     Equipment flow
      Heat transfer oil
      Gas
       Sludge
       Water
                                            Scraper
                                      Heat transfer oil
                                        Heat-transfer
                     •   (Digestion
                                        : Heat ransfer
Thickened
sludge
  Treat
  water
   Sending
   back
   water
                     j Dehydration
                     I sludge
                                 Fuel
                     •Exha'
                                       :gas
Exhaust

-------
    2. The technology for recovery of phosphorus from sewage
    sludge incineration ash (Zero-Discharge)
    Verification test plant
          Treatment capacity :        t^lP
          100 kg of incineration ash/day
Control
panel
                                                          Phosphat

                                                          washing
                                                          tank
                                                          Phosphat

                                                          atorage
                                                          tank

-------
Equipment flow
                                             alkaline solution
         NaOH
        Solution]
  o   o
recycling as a reactive liquid.

r  I   [ Case of recovery of
  I  calcium phosphate]
                      liquid fertilizer raw
                          material]
                                     O
Ca(OH)
   2
                          o
                  De-P ash
              Raw material for
               liquid fertilizer
                    Phosphate
                    extraction

                    Recovered
                    phosphate

-------
  3. Composition of activated carbon from sewage sludge and reduction
  of the cost for sludge treatment by effective utilization (Zero-Discharge)
     Verification test plant
Dryer unit
  Drying
  sludge
  hopper
            Treatment capacity :
             7.2 to 9.6 tons/day
                                                               Stack
 Heat recovery
1 device (heat
 exchanger)

Carbonization
furnace unit

-------
Equipment flow
                                                    Sludge
 	Gas
                   Dryer unit
                                                           Activated carbon
                                                              product
Carburization

 furnace unit
                               .ed slu'
             laust g
                              Heat recovery
                              device (heat
                              exchanger)
                                                  ombustio
             istga
"'
  *
  % *>••
  •* ' *
                                                                1< (9RV ftl.*K I5,

-------
    4. Energy recovery from sewage sludge and biomass with
    synchronous digestion (Energy Source)
         Verification test plant
            Treatment capacity : 50kg/day
Control digestion
tank (without
receiving biomass)
i

                         SU lJ  i
                         r- ±  \-

Digestion
tank

                Heat exchanger

-------
Eauioment flow
                  New
                  establishment
                  Supersonic wave
                    solubilization
                     equipment
Increase
                                     Jjesi
                                       Digestion
                                          gas
                                                   Digestion gas
          ower
 Gas
Holder
                                                               Electric
                                                                powert
       •[•i
    Collection
                                              heat
                    reprocessn
                                       Digested
                                        sludge
              Digestion gas power
                generating unit
              -*  Outside

-------
  5. The Development of the Anaerobic Co-digestion System for
  Power Generation with Low Running-cost (Energy Source)
    Verification test plant
             Bio desulfurization tower

    Treatment capacity : 50kg/day
 Weighting
measure
Mixing
tank
 Digestion tank (1
 m3)

                pH adjusting facility
                               Heat exchanger
Sludge circulation
pump
Treatment capacity
    20Nm3/hr
          Mixed digestion facility

-------
 Equipment flow
        nckem
                                                              Warm water
                              Digestion gas

                              Sludge
                                         geste
                          I    I
                                                          13  I
                                                           £  I
                                                                    (To  the  dehydration
                                                                    equipment.)
(receipt outside
   faction)
                Food
                Residue
     Warr
Digestion gas
                     Range of proposal
                        equipment
I    I
                                                 Warm water
                                                heatcoNection

                                                Electric power
                                                  collection
                                                                (To the existing
                                                               processing place.)
                                                                   m
                                                                   8"
                              . CD  'T3
                                  I™ I
               © Increase only of increase's worth
               © replace with biological desulfurizer
                 (the whole quantity)

-------
 6. Sludge reduction through accelerating digestion and
 electrical generating system using digestion gas (Energy
 Source'
  Verification test plant
                                     Treatment capacity : 30m3/day

 J.SUI
Ozone generator
(max. 2kg O3/hr)
Ozone reaction tank
                                   Anaerobic digestion tank
                                        ( 1,800 m3)
                                   Centrifugal thickener

-------
    Equipment flow
                                          Water

                                          Sludge
                                          Digestion gas
    icke
To the
wat
treatment
             Thickened sludge
              Ozonation sludgr
                      Atmospheric
                     A discharge
                     •
                     •
                     •Oxygen gas
                                         Digestion
                                           a
                                            gas
                                 Digestion
                      Ozone
                     Processor
                             Coagulant
                  Concentrated
                    machine
Recycle
                                      Digested
                                      (organic
                                      richness)
                                Concentrated
                                  machine
                                 Digested
                                 sludge
                                              richness)
                                                   IEEE
                                                VJH
Warm
water
discharge
                                                                                           tion
             Digestion gas
            Preprocessing
               device
                                                                    : Exhaust gas
                                                       Waste heat      Power
                                                        recovery     generating
                                                     Heat exchanger     unit
                 Supplying
                 Electric power

-------
7. Methane fermentation system of sewage sludge and raw garbage, and
carbonization-activation for utilization (Both Zero-Discharge and Energy
Source'
     Verification test plant
            Treatment capacity : 1.0ton/day
 Gas refmmi
 equipment
Current dryer

Activated     r
carbon furnace
Vertical
methane
fermentation
tank

  Horizontal
  methane
  fermentation
  tank
                                                         Crusher/separ
                                                         ator (raw
                                                         garbage, etc.)

-------
Equipment flow
Sludge and garbage

 Digestion gas
    r.ened slud
Garbage etc
                                               Digestion gas
                                         Fermentation
                                           Residue
                                                     Dehydration
                                                       sludge
                                 Digestion tank
                                                                  rbonization
                                                                  tivation uni
         Range of evaluation of Zero-Discharge technology

         Range of evaluation of Energy Source technology

-------
Private companies which developed  each technology
 1.  Hitachi Zosen Corporation
http://www.hitachizosen.co.jp/english/index-e.html
 2.  METAWATERCo., Ltd.
 3.  Kawasaki Plant Systems. Ltd.
 4.  Tsukishima  Kikai  Co.,LTD.
    JFE  Engineering Corporation
    Daiki Ataka Engineering  Co .
 5-  Ltd .
    Kajima Corporation
    DAINEN Co., Ltd.
    Hitachi Plant Technologies, Ltd.
http://www.metawater.co.jp/eng/index.html
http://www.khi.co.jp/kplant/english/index.html
http://www.tsk-g.co.jp/en/index.html
http://www.jfe-eng.co.jp/en/index.html
http://www.atk-dk.co.jp/english/index.html
http://www.kajima.co.jp/welcome.html
http://www.dainen.Jp/e/index.html
http ://www. h itach i-pt. com/
    KURITA Water Industries Ltd.
http://www.kurita.co.jp/english/index.html
 7.  Kawasaki Plant Systems. Ltd.
http://www.khi.co.jp/kplant/english/index.html

-------
Thank you for your kind attention.



        Japan Institute of Wastewater
     > >;

        Engineering Technology

-------
            Energy Efficiency in Water Treatment
                 (Energy/Water Nexus)
The Urban Water Resource Recovery Center - An
  Emerging Vision for Future Municipal Sewage
                    Treatment
                 Mr. Joseph E. Zuback
                      President
               Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
                                                    global
                                                     water
                                                    advisors™
   The Urban Water Resource Recovery Center
            - An Emerging Vision for Future
             Municipal Sewage Treatment
                 Japan - U.S. Joint Conference
            On Drinking Water Quality Management and
                      Wastewater Control
                        March 2, 2009
March 2, 2009
Las Vegas, Nevada
                                              Joe Zuback
                                               President
                                   Global Water Advisors, Inc.
 Page 1
March 2, 2009
       J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors All rights reserved.
Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
 Municipal wastewater treatment process R&D has
 focused on incremental efficiency improvements for
 individual unit operations
                                                    global
                                                     water
                                                    advisors™
The objective of conventional sewage treatment plant designs has historically
been compliance with environmental regulations for the lowest capital cost
   Municipal WWTP
   Unit Operations
   Primary treatment
   Secondary treatment
   Tertiary treatment
   Nutrient removal
   Disinfection
   Biosolids management
   Waste-to-energy
                        Technology Trajectories
                    High rate solids separation processes
                    Efficient aeration, N & P removal
                    Effluent quality and space (membranes)
                    Bio removal, PO4 precipitation
                    UV, membranes, onsite NaOCI gen.
                    Low yield bio processes
                    Methanization,  incineration, efficiency
  Page 2
March 2, 2009
         J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors All rights reserved.
Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
Continuous improvements will enable new objectives
necessary to conform with societal megatrends
                                        global
                                         water
                                        advisors™
  Megatrends
 Sustainability

    Energy

    Climate
    change
    Less tax
    revenue

   Resource
    scarcity
    Objectives
 From net energy user
to net energy producer
 Industrial and potable
   reuse of effluent
Small carbon footprint
  Recover inorganics
 New revenue streams
                       Public perception of
                       "sewage treatment"
 Development
    Areas
   Membranes
Nutrient recovery
Greenhouse gas
   mitigation
     Energy
  management
                                Treated water
                              reuse experience
  Page 3
March 2, 2009   J. Zuback
      Copyright © Global Water Advisors All rights reserved.
      Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
  Future membrane innovations will enable shift from
  net-energy-consumption to net-energy-production
                                                            global
                                                             water
                                                            advisors™
 Improved reverse osmosis and nanofiltration solutions will capture and
 concentrate organics for fuel value, while producing high quality treated
 effluent suitable for any water need
                                       -SR
BOD = X
TDS"^Y~1
  Today
BOD=_X
TDS = Y
  Future
                       Solids
                      Separation
               BOD = 0.4 X
                         Salt removal
                         (RO, NF, EDI
                                    TDS = Y
            EA!
               Waste-to-energy
               ESR :
          Combined solids
          and salt removal
                   BOD = X
                   IDS =Y
               Waste-to-energy
                                                 ESR + EA
                                   •SR
Key Development Trends
    and Challenges
- Improved membranes
  + Higher flux & rejection
  + Resistance to biological
   and organic fouling
  + Wear resistance

- Backwashable RO/NF
  + Optimize configuration
  + Boundary layer control
  + Prefiltration

- Other enhancements
  + Functional/zed surfaces
  + Cleaning techniques
    Page 4
March 2, 2009
          J. Zuback
                                 Copyright © Global Water Advisors  All rights reserved.
       Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
Innovative nitrogen and phosphorous removal will
reduce treatment costs and create new revenue sources
                                                                   global

                                                                    water
                                                                  advisors™
 P + N ^ High Value Fertilizer
                                           Low Energy Nitrogen Removal
The Ostara Fluidized Bed Reactor
                                                                Nitrogen Cycle



                                                          Denitrification
 Page 5
            March 2, 2009   J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors  All rights reserved.
Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
Future treatment plants will integrate  fuel,  energy,
and carbon footprint management strategies
                                                                       global
                                                                        water
                                                                      advisors™
 Emerging alternative energy solutions will enable multiple solutions
          Treatment Plant
           Anaerobic
            Digester
     Waste sludge
                          Electricity""-^.
                                     \
                          ~\Methane
             Electricity
            Generation
                                   Off-peak
                                    Power
                                   Storage
   Sludge Disintegration
      and recycle
                                  C02
    Algae Conversion
       to Biodiesel
                           Heat
       Incineration
                                          Biodiesel
                     L.
                   o1
  Sludge Disintegration Examples
  Wet air oxidation
  Sonification
  Cavitation
  Plasma arc

  Future Development
  Reduce energy
  Reduce capital cost
                              Off Peak Storage Examples
                              Flow battery
                              Pumped water storage
                              Compressed air storage
                              Hydrogen production

                              Future Development
                              Reduce storage losses
                              Reduce capital cost
Algae Conversion Examples
Decommissioned basins
Ponds
High rate algae contactors
Algae Wheel

Future Development
Light capture strategies
Reduce capital cost
Simplify process
  Page 6
March 2, 2009
                        J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors  All rights reserved.
            Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
Experience and confidence with RO-treated effluent
will increase demand as a water supply source
                                                               global
                                                                water
                                                               advisors™
  Industries especially benefit in terms of reduced costs, higher product
  yields, assured availability, and reduced industrial wastewater discharge
     RO units at Water Factory 21, Orange County (California) Water District
  High Value Uses for RO-treated effluent
  - potable water aquifer recharge
  - make-up water for industrial cooling and
   steam generation
  - make-up for for ultrapure water systems
   for semiconductor manufacturing
                                                           RO units B: i-:'3-_' l-ic/fate' P.'ac!
   Page 7
March 2, 2009
           J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors  All rights reserved.
Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
Combining R&D and experience factors into a single
holistic municipal wastewater management concept:
                                                              global
                                                               water
                                                              advisors™
  The Urban Water Resource Recovery Center
Sewage
Urban food waste
Septage
Misc. organics
                               Electricity
      Nutrient
    Removal and
      Recovery
         Optimized
         Anaerobic
         Digester
                            Methane \  Efficient
                                    Electricity
                                    Generation
                                Algae Conversion
                                   to Biodiesel
                                  Biodiesel
                                           Final
                                           Filter
                                                          Primary Revenue
                                                            Enhancements
                                                         Ultrapure water for
                                                         industry makeup and
                                                         aquifer recharge
                                     Peak electricity sales
                                     to grid or local use

                                     Other Revenue
                                   Urban waste disposal
                                   Carbon credits
                                   Sewage treatment fees
                                    Secondary Revenue
                                      Enhancements
                                   Brackish water for
                                   cooling, irrigation

                                   Fuel savings
                                    Inorganic Fertilizer
  Page 8
March 2, 2009
          J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors All rights reserved.
Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
Concluding remarks
                                                  global
                                                  water
                                                 advisors™
  Today's energy, climate change, and
 sustainability demands will influence the
 future of municipal wastewater plant design
 and operation


 • Anticipated technology advancements will
 soon allow WWTPs to improve efficiency,
 perhaps very significantly


 • The Urban Water Resource Recovery Center
 concept illuminates one potential path forward
 Page 9
March 2, 2009
        J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors All rights reserved.
Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
 Thank you!
 Phone:+1 805504-1347
 Email: jz@gwa4h2o.com
Contact
Joseph Zuback
President
Global Water Advisors, Inc.
Camarillo, CA
                                                  global
                                                  water
                                                 advisors™
Page 10
March 2, 2009  J. Zuback
Copyright © Global Water Advisors All rights reserved.
Global Water Advisors, Inc.

-------
     Climate Change
Mitigation and Adaptation

-------
          Climate Change - Mitigation and Adaptation
Impacts of Climate Change on Water Quality and
          Measures against Future Issues
                Dr. Yukihisa Hosaka, Ph.D.
    Director in Charge of Water Quality, Purification Division
     Bureau of Waterworks, Tokyo Metropolitan Government

-------
Impacts of Climate Change on
Water Quality and Measures
against Future Issues
     Yukihisa Hosaka, Ph.D.
 Director in charge of Water Quality
     Bureau of Waterworks,
 Tokyo Metropolitan Government

-------
Contents:
  Influence of climate change on water
  quality
  Measures in waterworks against climate
  change
  • Mitigation measures
  • Adaptation measures

-------
  Influence of Climate Change
  on Water Quality
i.  Increase in frequency of turbid water inflow
   due to increase in heavy rain
2.  Stagnation of circulation in reservoir due to
   global warming
3.  Increased risk of toxic chemicals in raw water
   due to increase in vermin
4.  Increase in production of trihalomethane due
   to water temperature rise
5.  Increased risk in pathogenic microorganisms
   in tap water due to water temperature rise

-------
    Heaviest Rain by Typhoon No.9
    in September 2007
Course of Typhoon No.9 in September 2007
                       Weather map at 9 a.m. on September 6th
                                   0759 mow
                                  965hPa
                   iieoRefenencse
from Japan Meteorological Agency

-------
  Water Resources for Water
  Supply in Tokyo
             w Sagami River
Ogochi Reservoir
                                Dam (completed)
                                D Dam (under construction])

-------
 Ogochi  Reservoir
 and Ozaku  Purification  Plant
                       Ozaku Purification Plant
                               1\
                  Okutama-machi
                                \ Ohme-shi
              Watershed Forests
Ogochi Reservoir
                                 Hinode-machi


                                kiruno-shi
    Fus
Hamura Intake
Weir

-------
Rainfall Status of Typhoon No.9

in September 2007
bO
F 50
E
<§> 40
-i— »
Q.
-g 30
~03
*£ 20
2
-^ 10
13
O
f\

Total amount of rainfall: 699 mm
in Ogochi Reservoir Maintenance
Office observation
•
J J. k

— i 	 i— —i
n rrr^rn\ |H~ £
















50
I















i










t





9







.


| 1 	 1 1 1 1 1
o
o
CN
   O
o
o
CN
      q

      CO
o
o
CN
         O
o
o
CN
         O
         o
            CD
o
o
CN
         O
            CD
o
o
CN
      O
      q

      CO


      CD
o
o
CN
                  O
                      CD
o
o
CN
               O
               o
o
o
CN
                      O
o
o
CN

-------
Contour Map of Turbidity in Ogochi
 Reservoir on September 18, 2007
                        525
      Example of
effluent  turbidity data in
      front of the Dam

-------
   in
  400
  300
I 200
ige in  Turbidity of Raw Water
 aku  Purification Plant after
 oon  No.9
           Highest value: 1900 deg.
      Lower supply capacity
      in Ozaku if turbidity is
      200 degrees or more.
         / Annual average of turbidity of Ozaku raw water
    9/1
   9/16
10/1
10/16   10/31   11/15

-------
     Stagnation of Circulation in
     Reservoir due to Global Warming
   Normal water circulation
If global warming advances
From spring to autumn
From spring to autumn
   Winter
                   lobal warming

-------
Stagnation of Circulation in
Reservoir due to Global Warming
           Winter
  Jlobal warming
  Nutrition salts eluting from sediments at
  the reservoir bottom may cause
  phenomena such as water-bloom even
  in winter.

-------
Increased Risk of Toxic Chemicals in
Raw Water due to Increase in Vermin
  Atmospheric temperature rise may have
  an impact on terrestrial ecosystem.
  The amount of agricultural chemicals is
  expected to rise due to an increase in
  the number of vermin.

-------
Increase in Production of
Trihalomethane due to Water
Temperature Rise
  The reaction rate of production of
  trihalomethane increases with water
  temperature.
  More consumption of residual chlorine
  due to water temperature rise requires
  more supply of chlorine in the water
  purification plant.
        Organic material
Chlorine
Trihalomethane

-------
Increased Risk of Pathogenic
Microorganisms in Tap Water due to
Water Temperature Rise

• Elevated water tanks affected by urban
  warming will increase the risk of
  pathogenic microorganisms in the tap
  water.

-------
Measures in  Waterworks
against Climate Change

•  Mitigation measures in waterworks
  i.  Promotion of renewable energy
  2.  Promotion of measures for water leakage
     prevention
•  Adaptation measures in waterworks
  i.  Measures to mitigate water-bloom in
     reservoir
  2.  Introduction of advanced purification
  3.  Proliferation/promotion of direct
     connection water supply

-------
   Promotion  of  Renewable Energy
   in Waterworks
 Solar power generation
(Asaka Purification Plant)
J 12,000
f 10,000
§ 8,000
                   2 6,000
                   O)
O)
Ol
a;
o
o_
4,000
2,000
                       0
                                     10,OOOkW
                          6,803kW
                       At the end of FY2006 At the end of FY2016
                          (Record)        (Target)
                         Target of power generation scale
                          of renewable energy in Tokyo
                               Waterworks

-------
     Promotion  of Measures for Water
     Leakage Prevention
100


90


80


70


60


50


40


30


20


10


 0
•Leakage rate ( % )
           Systematic detection
Emergency repair
      20% in 1955 J
  OiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOiOOOOOOOO
  i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I i—I C\l (7s! (7s! (7s! (7s! (7s! (7s! (7s!

-------
 Effect of Water Leakage
 Prevention
   Leakage rate
     20% in 1955
3.3% in 2007
Saving of approx. 340 million m3/year of
water (equivalent to water distribution in
a city with 2.5 million residents)
Saving of approx. 70 billion yen/year of
cost
Approx. 68 thousand tons/year reduction
of C02 emissions

-------
     Measures to mitigate water-bloom in

     reservoir againstxgJobal warming
                 »•/      >••/               *•/
      Fences stop the flpw of algae toward the direction of
      the dam in Ogochi Reservoir.
Influent
Fence
Fence
                                       Water flow

                                       Algae

-------
Measures to mitigate water-bloom in
reservoir against global warming
  Algae between the fences is transferred to the
  reservoir bottom with the pump system.
 I

-------
Effect of measures to mitigate
water-bloom in Ogochi Reservoir
        ro 300
        Jj 250
Blue-green algae •others
                     Fences
                     Pumps
                 Installation of
                  equipment

-------
Introduction of Advanced Water
Purification Treatment to Reduce
Odors and Chlorine Supply

                   .Ozone generator
       Ozone treating basin
Biological activated
carbon absorbing basin
Raw
water
-
Coagulation and
sedimentation
•>•
V
Ozone
treatment
cr

-
N
Biological activated
carbon absorbing
£^

•
advanced water purification
Rapid sand
filtering
-
Purified
water

-------
   Proliferation/promotion  of Direct
   Connection Water  Supply
Water supply system
with receiving tank
         —i
           — Elevated tank
                               Pressure water
                              service system
Water pressure
 in distribution
pipe released at
 receiving tank
                 ^Effective use crP
                    the water
                   pressure in
                  distribution pipe
                            Booster pump unit
            Pump
        Receiving tank

-------
    Waterworks in  the Future:  Preparing
    for Risks  Caused by Climate Change
Waterworks: Operations based on
past climate conditions
(patterns of rainfall and snowfall)
                                          ~4,8
  .—Unprecedented
^J   changes in the
      environment
     due to climate
   r~"W  change
                             Temperature rise after 100 years
 f Analysis/research of risks associated with climate
 V change and provision of appropriate information

   Studies of approaches that are not bound to
 V conventional ideas or frameworks

-------
Climate Change - Mitigation and Adaptation
  Climate Change and Energy
         Mr. Robert C. Renner
          Executive Director
       Water Research Foundation
          (formerly AwwaRF)

-------
    Climate Change
             and
           Energy
           Robert C. Renner
           Executive Director

Japan-U.S. Joint Conference on Drinking Water Quality
     Management and Wastewater Control
            March 2, 2009
          Las Vegas, Nevada
                               WATER
                               RESEARCH

-------
            About the
   Water Research Foundation

  The Water Research Foundation
 (formerly known as AwwaRF) is the
world's largest nonprofit organization
dedicated to providing critical drinking
          water research.
                               WATER
                               RESEARCH
           © 2009 Waler Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
      Clarifying Our Mission
From "Awwa Research Foundation
(AwwaRF)"
      Awwa
      Research
      Foundation
   Advancing the Science of Water"!
To the "Water Research Foundation
(Foundation)"
WATER RESEARCH
FOUNDATION
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE or WATER'
                                 WATER
                                 RESEARCH
            © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
  New Name, Same Mission:
Advancing the science of water to
    improve the quality of life
                             WATER
                             RESEARCH
         © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
     What the Foundation Does
Gathers input on and sponsors research to
understand, manage and solve water utilities'
most pressing problems

Serves as the global hub of water research
information

Provides data to help regulators establish
drinking water standards

Collaborates with global universities and water
organizations
                                       WATER
                                       RESEARCH
              © 2009 Waler Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation's Contribution to the
         Water Community

Practical applications to help utilities optimize
operations and ensure customer satisfaction
Early alert and proactive solutions on future
issues
Direct, immediate benefits to utility subscribers
                                     WATER
                                     RESEARCH
                                     F n . j i. n ,•>
             © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
          Climate Change
Climate change has evolved from a science
community issue to a global, public concern.
Water is the fundamental issue in climate
change.
Water utilities have mobilized to create strong
pressure for investment in research and
infrastructure.
                                     WATER
                                     RESEARCH
             © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
        Chief contributors
        to the Greenhouse
        Effect;  \
          -C02  \
          * Metiraite
I Suddenly. Bob realizes that he's 'part of the problem
                                                                         ITWASNT
                                                                            HE...
                                                                                               WATER
                                                                                               RESEARCH
                                                                                               F n .j  i. n ,•> T i o w
                                       © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
          Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change
               Warming intensifies the hydrologic cycle
 urface temperature increase
Increased water holding capacity
                                        CQNDtNSATWN
                                        ILATENIHEATING I
                                        OF ATMOSPHERE I
Increased atmospheric moisture

                                                            BOUNDARY LAVE*
                                                            (AND EXCHANGE
                                                           W17XFREI ATMOSPHERE)
Changing
Frequency
Increased
Intensity
Droughts
 Floods
                      © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
                                                        WATER
                                                        RESEARCH
                                                        F n .j ». n ,•> r i o w

-------
Issues of Concern to Water Utilities
      Water Availability
      Water Quality
      Rising Sea Levels
      More Frequent Extreme Events
                                      WATER
                                      RESEARCH
                                      F n .j ». n ,•> r i o w
              © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Issues of Concern to Water Utilities
                (cont'd)

    Operational Reliability
    Energy & GHG Emissions
    Financial and Institutional Impacts
                                      WATER
                                      RESEARCH
                                      F n . j i. n ,•>
               © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
           Climate Change
          Strategic Initiative
Water Research Foundation has undertaken the
Climate Change Strategic Initiative to establish a
research program focused on impacts of climate
change on water supplies.


 i/ater Research Foundation will commit up to $1
million  in funding per year for the initiative.
The target timeframe for the initiative is 5-7 years.
                                      WATER
                                      RESEARCH
              © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
            Climate Change

           Strategic Initiative

Objectives:
•  Enhance and improve water industry awareness
  of climate change issues and impacts
•  Provide water utilities with a set of tools to
  identify and assess their vulnerabilities, and
  develop effective adaptation strategies
•  Provide water utilities with a set of tools to
  assess and minimize their carbon footprint
•  Communicate information to internal/external
  stakeholders
                                         WATER
                                         RESEARCH
                © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
           Climate Change
          Strategic  Initiative
Research Needs Workshop
   • Denver, January 8-9, 2008
   • 57 participants from the US, UK, Canada and
    Australia
   • 50 project ideas with cumulative estimated
    budget of $17.5M
Additional workshops
   • Edinburgh, Scotland 2007
    London, England 2008
WATER
RESEARCH
                                       F n . i i. n ,•>
               © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Climate Change Planning Workshop
              Outcomes
Focus areas:
    Water resources
    Water quality and treatment
    Infrastructure
    Energy and environment
    Communications and management
                                   WATER
                                   RESEARCH
                                   F n .j ». n ,•> r i o w
              © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
   Energy and Water are
     Inextricably Linked
It takes water to produce energy
             and
    energy to produce water
                             WATER
                             RESEARCH
                             F n . j i. n ,•>
         © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
      ENERGY AND WATER RELATIONSHIPS
              WATER FOR ENERGY
        Extraction & Refining
Hydropower
Fuel Production
(Ethanol, hydrogen)
        Thermo electric
        Cooling
  Waste Water
  Treatment
         Extraction and
         Transmission
        Energy Associated
        with Uses of Water
    Drinking Water
    Treatment
              ENERGY FOR WATER
                 © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
                    WATER
                    RESEARCH
                                                F n . j i. n ,•> r

-------
        Water for Energy
Thermoelectric power requires 136 billion
gallons (515 million m3) of water per day in
the U.S.
 - 39 % of freshwater withdrawals
 - 3.3 billion gallons (12.5 million cubic meters)
  per day consumptive use
Petroleum refining consumes 2 billion
gallons/day (7.6 million cubic meters/day)
of water
                                    WATER
                                    RESEARCH
          © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
       Energy for Water
Water/wastewater sector consumes
about 3% of US energy
10 % - 35 % of utility's total operating
costs is for energy
50% increase in energy use for water
in next 50 yrs
                               WATER
                               RESEARCH
                               F n .j ». n ,•> r i o w
         © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
   Percent Increase in Ener
Technology            3.8  37.8 •
3.8  37.8  189 378
km3  km3  km3 km3
Conventional
Conventional + UV
Conventional + O3.5 log
Conventional + O3 2 log
Conventional + MF/UF
N/A  N/A  N/A N/A
     100  110  120
     160  170  190
     170  190  190
Conventional + NF/RO   210  700  780  830
                                    WATER
                                    RESEARCH
                                    F O
              © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------

        Existing Research


Climate Change and Water Resources:
A Primer for Municipal Water Providers
Effects of climate change on water utility planning
and design standards
Utility greenhouse gas emissions
Decision tool to incorporate climate change
information in water utility planning
Energy efficiency in the water industry: a
compendium of tools, case studies and best
practices
Toolbox of process models, performance
evaluation and impact assessment
                                         WATER
                                         RESEARCH
             © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
             Current RFP
Identifying And Developing Climate Change
Resources For Water Utilities: Content For A
Central Knowledge Repository Website (RFP
4208)
 • The objective is to identify and develop
  content for a central knowledge repository
  website, or clearinghouse, to assist water
  utilities in assessing and managing the
  impacts of climate change.
                                      WATER
                                      RESEARCH
              © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
        Planned  Research

Climate change impacts on the regulatory
landscape:  evaluating opportunities for
regulatory change
Vulnerability assessment and risk management
tools for climate change:  assessing  potential
impacts and identifying adaptation options
Analysis of changes in water use under regional
climate change scenarios
Changing mindsets to promote design of
"sustainable infrastructure" under climate change
Carbon sequestration
                                     WATER
                                     RESEARCH
             © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
            Conclusions
Drinking water utilities are keenly aware of
climate change issues and are seeking
answers
Foundation climate change research has laid
the foundation but much work remains to be
done
The Foundation has a track record of
successful partnering with utility coalitions,
global research institutes, and federal and state
agencies on climate change research
                                      WATER
                                      RESEARCH
             © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
                      Questions?
   For more information on

 Water Research Foundation's
    Climate Change Program,
              visit


www.waterresearchfoundation.org


         Thanks!
 THIS is THE: SOLUTION
WE'VE DEVISED FOR DEALING
WITH THE FLOODING CAUSED
  Bf CLIMATE CHANGE.
                                                     WATER
                                                     RESEARCH

                      © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
           Climate Change - Mitigation and Adaptation
Climate Change Mitigation in Sewerage - Biomass
              and Energy Technologies
                  Mr. Hiromasa Yamashita
          Senior Researcher, Recycling Research Team
      Material and Geotechnical Engineering Research Group
               Public Works Research Institute

-------
Japan - U.S. Joint Conference On Drinking Water Quality Management and Wastewater Control

                    March 2-5, 2009
             Climate change mitigation  in
             sewerage
             -biomass and energy technologies
                  Hiromasa YAMASHITA
                  Kensuke SAKURAI, Toyohisa MIYAMOTO, and
                  Seiichiro OKAMOTO
                  Recycling Research Team, Material and
                  Geotechnical Engineering Research Group,
                  Public Works Research Institute

-------
Climate change mitigation in sewerage
Outline


   Trends surrounding biomass use
     Wildly fluctuating price of crude oil
     Climate Change mitigation (trial of emission trading)
o  Potential of using biomass produced by public works
o  Development of various utilization technologies
   • Mixed methane fermentation, biogas utilization
     technologies
   • Energy conversion technologies (PFBI: Pressurized
     Fluidized Bed Incinerator)
   • Outlines of other technologies under development
o  Toward implementing the developed technologies in
   actual projects and policies

-------
        Trends surrounding biomass use
        Wildly fluctuating price of crude oil
   o  The price of crude oil is fluctuating more rapidly and broadly than
      ever before.
   o  We must carefully watch  medium to long term price trends.
   o  In conjunction with climate change mitigation, we are going to
      strengthen policies to promote energy conservation and to use
      alternative energies.
     WTI spot price (daily data)
                                  160
                                  140
                                _g 100


                                I  80
                                O

                                °  60


                                   40


                                   20


                                   0
WTI spot price (annual average)
                                         (Note) 2008 data is average of Jan. to Oct. data
                     Z
                                                  Year
Source) Prepared based on Cusffifig, OK. WTI Spot Price FOB (Dollars per Barrel) http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/rwtcD.htm

-------
              Trends surrounding biomass  use
              Soaring  price of phosphorus
  	JA Group : Japan Agricultural Cooperative Association
                                                      ~~>

  Prices of raw materials of fertilizers are rising rapidly around the world.
  Even in Japan, the prices of fertilizers are unavoidably rising.
      Nitrogen, phosphoric acid, potassium carbonate, and all raw materials
      which are part of fertilizers are at their highest prices in history, pushing
               up the price of fertilizers around the world.
(Index assuming
2005=100)

   600
2005 fertilization year
2007 fertilization year
                                            Tripled over previous year
                                         /^(Doubled over previous yearj
           Urea (nitrogen)
           Ammonium phosphate (phosphoric acid
           Alum chloride (potassium carbonate)
          oThe demand for bio-fuel on
          top of rising world-wide food
          demand, is rapidly pushing
          up demand for fertilizers.

          ©International prices of
          fertilizer raw materials are
          rising at an accelerating
          pace

          OJA started raw materials
previous year]  prices surcharge on fertilizer
          prices in 2008
                                                                      Attention is shifting
                                                                      to the recovery of
                                                                      phosphorus in
                                                                      biosolids.
                                            Survey by JA Zen-Noh
        Source: 2008 Fertilization Year: Results of Fertilizer Price Negotiations: Attachment (JA Zen-Noh)
               http://www.zennoh.or.jp/ZENNOH/TOPICS/release/20/06/200627.htm

-------
Trends surrounding  biomass use
Strengthening Climate change mitigation
                                                             •ft,
°To achieve the Kyoto protocol reduction commitment (6% below 1990 level),
emissions must be cut by 9.3% in 2008-2012

Opriority on the use of biomass and other new energies
  Emissions
  (100 billion
 13-
                                 1.371 million tons (+2.3% compared with previous year)
                                 (+8.7%)
 12 -
 11
 10 -
OI UU2)
k
/
/
1 9R1
billion tons















^^^m
Z.4*





|
',
*



^^^
Z.4%




'





^^^m
4.3%





:-'


-- ,



t !X-





• *.



- -9



'• -1%





•-*







'., !''•::•





i .0-^ DMiion ions 17
*<++ (+6.3%) jX*^
' 'A ^^



~ - ±

5.0%


-:.3**i
""['"




^---^^
r • --i
(+0.5%

8.3%



)
Case assuming that electric power emissions unit was 1 .267
o.34kg-co2/kWh bj||jon tons
(The electric power emissions unit under the goal „ / g go/
achievement plan of the Kyoto Protocol was assumed to be
about 0.34kg-C02/kWh ' compared
with







































previous
year)



V
\
\
\

1.254 "T?^
billion tons psx-
P
(-0.6%) t$$
1.186
billion tons I

(-6%)
    I  I  I	I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I
                     J	I	L
      J	L
                                                           Emissions must
                                                            be cut by 9.3%
                                                           Case where it is assumed1
                                                            to be 0.34kg-CO2/kWh
                                                            Must be cut 1.1%
                                                           3.8% by forest absorption source measures
                                                           1.6% by Kyoto mechanisms
Fiscal Year
  Base year

(in principle, 1990)
2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005
2006     2007    Kyoto Protocol commitment
    (Preliminary figures) period (2008 - 2012)
    (Source) From the web site of the Ministry of the Environment
    ( http://www.env.go.jp/earth/ondanka/ghg/2007sokuho_gaiyo.pdf)

-------
        Trends surrounding biomass use
        Strengthening Climate change mitigation

        o The Global Warming Prevention Headquarters (Oct.
          12, 2008) decided to begin Trial Implementation of
          the Integrated Domestic Market in Emissions Trading

1. Purpose of the scheme
   •  To construct rules which effectively encourage efforts to reduce
   emissions and develop technologies
   •  Use of market mechanisms to induce technology development
   and emissions reductions
 2  . Basic framework
   •  Each corporation voluntarily sets its emission reduction
   commitment, and takes emission reduction measures to achieve the
   commitment.
   •  To achieve its commitment it can trade emission credits.

-------
       Trends surrounding biomass use

       Japan's Voluntary Emissions

       Trading Scheme (JVETS)

o Two schemes of trial implementation

(1)Each corporation voluntarily sets its emission reduction commitment
  and seeks to achieve it by trading the quantity it achieves above its
  commitment (the emissions quota) or the credits in scheme (2).

(2) The corporation creates and trades credits which can be used in
  scheme (1).
   • Domestic credits (Based on  the Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement
     Plan, credits created as supplementary emission reductions by
     medium and small corporations and through emission reduction
     activities applying forest biomass etc.
   • Kyoto Credits
   Supplementary reduction of emissions can be traded in money
   (potential for new incentives)

-------
Climate change mitigation in sewerage
Outline
o  Trends surrounding biomass use
   •  Wildly fluctuating price of crude oil
   •  Climate change mitigation (trial of emissions trading)
   Potential of using biomass produced by public works
   Development of various utilization technologies
   •  Mixed methane fermentation, biogas utilization
      technologies
   •  Energy conversion technologies (PFBI: Pressurized
      Fluidized Bed Incinerator)
   •  Outlines of other technologies under development
o  Toward implementing the developed technologies in
   actual projects and policies


-------
Potential of using biomass
produced by public works
Nr ^^MWHM^^W
o What is biomass produced by public works?
   • Pruned wood, grass clippings, driftwood etc.
     collected along rivers and roads, in parks, at
     airports and at other public places

                               Pruned wood and
                               grass clippings yard

                               (City of Yokohama)
                                            9

-------
     Potential of using biomass
     produced by public works
o Biomass produced  by public works is an extremely
  valuable usable resource
   • Its energy reserves are high
       It is estimated to be almost equal to the quantity of biosolids
       produced in Japan
   • It exists in and around cities which consume large
     quantities of energy.
     Management systems are already in place.
      -+At this time, it is processed and disposed of during
     maintenance work.

-------
              Potential of using biomass produced by public works
              Establishment of a biomass inventory
                                     •ft,
      The quantity and quality of biomass produced, and available period
      are summarized to establish the inventory
          Average quantity produced: 0.2 to 0.4kg (dry weight)/m2
        • Yield can be increased by improving control method
Hokkaido j river a
     T river b
     T river c
     T riverd
     T river e
     T river f
     T riverg
chubu  S river a
     S river b
     S river c
     S river d
chugoku O river a
     O river b
shikoku  y river a
shikoku  Y river b
To Nat. highway a
To Nat. highway b
To Nat. highway c
Kyushu  T river a
     T river b
=1





iL,





n

=1






















i

i

i

i

i

i
]
D

i



]





i

[R<
Gic
Ve






|

3feren
nt knotv\
tch's bar




i

ce]
eed (Po
nboo (S


i

ygonum
3sa veitc

1
sachalir
hii (Carr

/
ense) c<
)) comm


*•"
>mmunit
unity: (1


/
f. 1 .34 (I
1 1 kg-D
••^

X
;g-DS/m
S/m2)
^
         0.0  0.2   0.4  0.6  0.8  1.0  1.2   1.4
                   Production yield: (kg-DS/m2)
                             A resource
                             management
                             system is needed
                             in order to
                             manage it as a
                             biomass
                             resource and to
                             use it stably.
                           Examples of biomass
                           produced by management
                           of public green belts
1.6
1.8
2.0
                                          11

-------
 Climate change mitigation in sewerage
 Outline
 o  Trends surrounding biomass use
     •  Wildly fluctuating price of crude oil
     •  Climate change mitigation (trial of emission trading)
 o  Potential of using biomass produced by public works
I o  Development of various utilization technologies
     •  Mixed methane fermentation, biogas utilization
       technologies
     •  Energy conversion technologies (PFBI: Pressurized
       Fluidized Bed Incinerator)
     •  Outlines of other technologies under development
 o  Toward implementing the developed technologies in
    actual projects and policies
                                                       12

-------
       Development of various utilization technologies
       Mixed methane fermentation with biosolids
       o  Steam explosion treatment
             The raw material is compressed with high pressure steam,
             maintained for between a few tens of seconds to more than ten
             minutes, then instantaneously released
       o  Products of the steam explosion treatment of grass
          clippings,  pruned wood, driftwood, and other waste
          plant biomass can be used for mixed methane
          fermentation with biosolids.
Recovery of methane by mixed fermentation with waste plant biomass and biosolids (image diagram).
Plant biomass
 Mowing and
 pulverizing
Pre-processing (steam explosion treatment)
  After pressurizing by high temperature and high
pressure water steam, it is instantaneously released and
 depressurized, causing explosive pulverization and
 reduction of molecular weight of the plant biomass.
  Anaerobic digestion (methane
       fermentation)
It is mixed with biosolids etc. then fermentation
decomposition occurs under anaerobic condition
     to recover methane gas.
 Energy use
It is used as fuel or
 to generate
  electricity.
        13

-------
       Development of various utilization technologies
       Mixed methane fermentation with biosolids
o  Transforming the state of woody chips by steam explosion
   treatment.
    Physical destruction         Chemical transformation
 The acetyl groups in the hemicellulose are separated by hydrolysis, forming
 large quantities of acetic acid

 Reduction of molecular weight of hemicelluloses and lignin
 Photo 1. Steam explosion test apparatus
Photo 2. Example of steam explosion material of broad-leaved trees
                                                                    14

-------
            Development of various utilization technologies
            Mixed methane fermentation with biosolids
           o  The quantity of gas produced increases approximately
              proportionally to the quantity mixing ratio
.Q q
"o ^
-o (D
o w
&-S
$£
O) ^

-------
Development of various utilization technologies
Mixed methane fermentation with biosolids
o By using steam explosion treatment,
  pruned wood, grass clippings, and
  other plant biomass can be mixed with
  biosolids and fermented in anaerobic
  digestion tanks at sewage treatment
  plants.
o Steam explosion  treatment can use
  waste heat from a biosolids incinerator.
o The challenge is to develop a high
  volume steam explosion process.
                                       16

-------
           Development of various utilization technologies
           Energy conversion technologies
           (PFBI: Pressurized Fluidized Bed Incinerator)
o  Next-generation technology to replace the fluidized bed incinerators now
   the most widely used type in the sewerage treatment field
o  Construction of energy saving and generating systems while taking
   advantage of the benefits of a conventional fluidized bed incinerators.
  Joint research by the PWRI,
  Tsukishima Kikai Co. Ltd.,
  Sanki Engineering Co. Ltd.,
  and Advanced Industrial
  Science and Technology
 Moisture content
 unsuited for incineration
 is converted to energy.
i Energy saving
! (Conventional
I fluidizing blower is
 unnecessary.)
    Figure: Basic structure and
    flow of the PFBI (pressurized
    fluidized bed incinerator)
                                             Surplus air
                                        Smokestack
                            Tail gas treatment tower
 T°
w
                                           ore-heater
       Pressurized fluid bed incinerator
    Fixed quantity feeder
          Dust Collector
             White smoke prevention fan
                                                                           17

-------
         Development of various utilization technologies
         Energy conversion technologies
         (PFBI: Pressurized  Fluidized Bed Incinerator)

o  Good results are obtained by experiment of mixed combustion
   with plant biomass
      Supplementary fuel use is cut from that consumed when incinerating biosolids only
      (self-sustaining combustion is possible)
   r- 1000
   ^  900
   "re
   o>
   Q-  800
   a>
      700
      600
      500
                   M
xture of biosolids and chips ins
                       0.5
         0  1  2 3 4 5 6  7  8 9 10 1112131415161718
                                  Elapsed time [hr]
           1 Sand layer temperature (1)	Sand layer temperature (2)

           FB temperature (1)   	FB temperature (2)

           Furnace outlet gas temperature ^^^_ Combustion air pressure
" Sand layer temperature (3)

. FB temperature (3)


Furnace outlet gas pressun
                                  Also effective  as
                                  a climate change
                                  mitigation

                            State  of  combustion  during
                            mixed combustion of biosolids
                            and       wood       chips
                            (biosolids :chips = 1:1 (DS))

                                                   18

-------
    Development of various utilization technologies
    Energy conversion technologies
    (PFBI:  Pressurized Fluidized Bed Incinerator)
o  Case of a 10Ot/day capacity system
o  Electric power consumption reduced about 40% and fuel costs between
   10 and 15%
o  CO2 emissions cut between 40 and 45% from conventional type
o  N2O emissions can also be cut by high temperature incineration
o  Installation space cut to about 3/4 and construction cost by about 10%
   below that for a conventional system
                                                  Combustion exhaust gas
                                     Compressed/
                                     fluidized bee
                                          I
                                     incinerator!
                                                             Superch
                                                              arger
                                                       Air intake
 Energy saving
(Conventional fluidizing
blower is unnecessary.
  Compressed air
          •*/,•.•;;,
(Used for aeration etc.)
                                                         !	New-Energy	
                                    Outline of PFBI (pressurized fluidized bed incinerator)
                                                                 19

-------
         Development of various utilization technologies
         Strong points  of PFBI
                             _.
Strong  point  1
•  Pressurized combustion improves
combustion efficiency. Volume of
incinerator is cut to about 1/3 of that
of a conventional type.
                                  *'••.
Strong point 2
•  Supercharger is powered by
exhaust gas energy, producing
compressed air
 PFBI: Pressurized Fluidized Bed Incinerator
       PFBI: Pressurized Fluidized Bed Indicator
Fixed quantity feeder
              Strong point 3
                •  A conventional
              fluidizing blower and
                inducing fan are
              unnecessary, saving
                 electric power
               CO2 emissions are
                cut by more than
                     40%.
                                                                     20

-------
      Development of various utilization technologies
      Biogas utilization technologies

           Gas refining methods, siloxane removal,
           storage technologies (adsorption storage)
         • Technology for more efficient methane
           fermentation
Nr ^^MWHM^^W
Kobe City biogas
station

(Supplied as fuel for city
busses etc.)
                                                     21

-------
     Development of various utilization technologies
     Biogas utilization technologies

    o  Use of biomass to fuel CNG vehicles
        • The high pressure water absorption method, which
          can achieve a high recovery rate and high density
          refining of methane gas is applied.

        • Treated wastewater is used for refinement.
•ft,
Joint research by City of Kobe, PWRI, and Kobelco Eco-Solutions Co. Ltd.
Refining method
Absorption water supply method
Rated treatment quantity
Maximum pressure during use
Absorption tower dimensions
Dehumidifying method
Type of absorption water
High pressure absorption method
Transient or cyclical mode (switching possible)
Digestion gas (not desulphurized) 80m3N/h
0.99MPa
Interior diameter: 400mm, full height: about 14m
Two-tower type PSA
Absorption agent and molecular sieve
Sand filtered water
                                                           22

-------
   Development of various utilization technologies
   Technologies now under development
   (Outline)
•ft,
o Stable storage of plant biomass
   • Development of technology to carbonize large
     quantities of grass clippings
      • Dry distillation gas constituent countermeasure -> study
        of extremely low temperature carbonization
o Biogas engine
     Development of systems
     which can be easily introduced to
     medium and small scale facilities
o Others (use as material)
   • Storage technologies for phosphorus contained in
     biomass incineration ash
                                                    23

-------
Climate change mitigation in sewerage
Outline
o  Trends surrounding biomass use
   •  Wildly fluctuating price of crude oil
   •  Climate change mitigation (trial of emissions trading)
o  Potential of using biomass produced by public works
o  Development of various utilization technologies
   •  Mixed methane fermentation, biogas utilization
      technologies
   •  Energy conversion technologies (PFBI: Pressurized
      Fluidized Bed Incinerator)
   •  Outlines of other technologies under development
   Toward implementing the developed technologies in
   actual projects and policies
                                                      24

-------
       Toward implementing the developed technologies in actual projects
       and policies
       Japan's Voluntary Emissions      ^™
       Trading Scheme (JVETS)
o Two schemes of trial implementation

(1)Each corporation voluntarily sets its emission reduction
  commitment and seeks to achieve it by trading the
  quantity it achieves above its commitment (the emissions
  quota) or the credits in (2).

(1) The corporation creates and trades credits which can
  be used in (1).
     Domestic credits (Based on the Kyoto Protocol Target
     Achievement Plan, credits created as supplementary
     emission reductions by medium and small corporations
     and through emission reduction activities applying
     forest biomass etc.
   • Kyoto Credits
                                                   25

-------
         Toward implementing the developed technologies in actual projects
         and policies
         Image of the creation of domestic credits using
         biomass produced by public works
                  Integrated Domestic Market in Emissions trading
      Certification/verification  body
                                                           Domestic emissions^V
                                                                trading     .^
©Application

project credits
                             rtification
                             edits
                                                      ale of credits
                                                                 Corporate enterprises
                                                                     emitting CO2
                                                      urchase price
                                                                Electric power generation
                                                            Sale of electric power or use on site
  Public green belt
     managers
(Grass clippings, pruning
  trees, and gathering
 driftwood on roads and
 rivers, at dams, in parks
and airports, at ports, and
   along railway lines)
                           Sewerage treatment
                             plant managers
                          (Use of biosolids for methane
                           fermentation, electric power
                          production, and conversion to
                                 fuel)
                          Factories etc. converting
                             biomass to fuel
Electric power
companies etc.
Biomass powered
electric power plants
Coal powered thermal
electric power plants
Others


     Delivery of grass
      clippings etc.
                         Delivery of bio-fuel
                                                                                              £1
                                                                                              $
                                         o
                                         u
                                         +J


                                         0)
                                         01
                                         re
                                         re
                                                                                       o
                                                                                              o
                                         o
                                         o
                                         (/)

                                         £1
                                         re
                                         u

                                         o
                                         re
                                         o
                                         +j
                                         o
                                         '•5
                                         .n
                                                                                              O
Prepared by the Public Works Research Institute with reference to
documents from the Ministry of the Environment and Forestry Agency
26

-------
       Toward implementing the developed technologies in actual projects
       and policies
       Technologies needed
With priority on the development and implementation of
technology for the efficient use of biomass energy;

•  Minimizing initial investment and maintenance costs (by using
existing facilities, etc.)

•  Minimizing emission of CO2 in converting biomass to energy
(Evaluation based on LCCO2)

     o  Methane fermentation (mixed fermentation with biosolids)
     o  Solid fuel production
     o  Gasification
     o  Use of heat and electric power production by direct combustion
     o  Technology to convert more unused biomass to energy
                                                              27

-------
 Toward implementing the developed technologies in actual projects
 and policies
 Technologies considered  necessary

o Social systems and infrastructure which can
  efficiently utilize biomass energy are needed.

   • Increasing efficiency by expansion and integration
     (large cities)
     Efficient use of local biomass (regional biomass
     utilization centers)
     (Regional cities, agricultural villages)

o Control systems for optimized use of biomass
  in terms of cost and energy (CO2 reduction) are
  needed.
                                                  28

-------
           Toward implementing the developed technologies in actual projects
           and policies
           (Example case) Recycling of resources
           centered on sewage treatment facilities
        o  Introducing other forms of biomass at an existing
           sewage treatment plant to produce resources and
           energy (Suzu City in Ishikawa Prefecture)
                               _.
Kitchen garbage etc. are recycled as new resources along with
biosolids!
•  The residue produced is fermented and
dried, then used as fertilizer.
•  The methane gas produced is recovered
as energy by boiler combustion.
•  The energy is used to heat the methane
fermentation tank and for drying during the
manufacture of the fertilizer.
                                           • Construction completed in July 2007
                                           • Total project cost: 1.39 billion yen (around 140
                                           billion U.S. dollar)
                                           • Subsidized by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure
                                           and Transport, and Ministry of the Environment
                                                    Source: Document from the Ministry of Land,
                                                    Infrastructure and Transport

-------
Climate change mitigation in

sewerage
-biomass and energy technologies
_.
 Thank you all very much for your
 kind attention.
                                       30

-------
        Climate Change - Mitigation and Adaptation
The Plan for Mitigation of Global Warming by
     Tokyo Metropolitan Sewerage Bureau
               -Earth Plan 2004-
                 Mr. Kiyoshi Inoue
       Director, Planning and Coordination Division
    Bureau of Sewerage, Tokyo Metropolitan Government

-------
The Plan for Mitigation of Global Warming
 by Tokyo Metropolitan Sewerage Bureau

        - Earth Plan 2004 -
Kiyoshi Inoue
Bureau of Sewerage
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
               *

-------
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
                                      Business & Industry
       CO2 emission
   Approx. 2.3 million tons
                                          Household
  ewerage
  Bureau
                                        Transport
                                       CO2 emission
                                   Approx. 60 million tons
              Tokyo Metropolita
FY2000
         Earth Plan 2004
      Target Reduction Rate
              6%
                                        10-Year Project
                                    for a Carbon-Minus Tokyo
                                     Target Reduction Rate
                                   25% with Emission Trading

-------
Tokyo Ward Area Sewerage
     • Projected area	57,839ha
 Tokyo  * Projected population-  •  •  9,093,000 people
     • Total length of sewers	15,700km
     • Number of pumping stations	82
     • Number of Water Reclamation Centers •  13
     • Volume treated	4,800,000 m3/day
     • Annual power consumption- 800 million kWh

-------
  Basic Policy of "Earth Plan 2004"
-Reference fiscal
     year-
   1990
1,018,000 t-
              Reduction level
               6% or above
 -Target fiscal
    year-

    2009
956,000 t-CO2

-------
    Estimation of greenhouse gas emission and
              target of Earth  Plan 2004
(10:OOOt-GO2)
   120


   110


   100
  95.6

    90


    80
     0
  101.8
,.
  •* -111 - -
           1990FY
        Reference Year
        Speculated volume without
     counter-measure implementation
                 110.1
                        Earth Plan 2004
                         6% reduction
                          target line
              Speculated
              volume with
            counter-measure
             implementation

   2004FY       2009FY
Plan drafted Year   Target Year

-------
  Outline of Measures for Mitigation of Global
         Warming in "Earth Plan 2004"
      Global warming mitigation
Reduction of
greenhouse
gas generated
in waste water
treatment
Switching to
energy source
with less
greenhouse
gas emission
Cooperation
with various
activities etc.

-------
       Measures for Mitigation of Global Warming in
                       "Earth Plan 2004"
r        .\
   Reduction of
  greenhouse gas
  emission due to
    wastewater
    treatment
V	J
• Reduction of power consumption in wastewater
treatment process
•Reduction of dinitrogen monoxide (N2O) generated in
sludge treatment process
•Well-managed maintenance
        .
   Switching to
  energy sources
     with less
  greenhouse gas
     emission
• Utilization of renewable energy
• Introduction of new power source
•Promotion of fuel switching

-------
 Reduction of power consumption in wastewater
              treatment process (1/2)
(a) Introduction of fine-bubble diffuser

    Illustration of reduction by improvement of air diffuser
      Blower
0
o
            0 00
           Reaction tank
       Conventional
         diffuser
               Power consumption

                20% reduction
                Oxygen transfer
                  efficiency
               Low=> High
                                       Blower
                                            -• I.WJ:
   Reaction tank
Fine-bubble air
   diffuser

-------
 Reduction of power consumption in wastewater
              treatment process (2/2)
(b) Development and introduction of energy-saving agitator
      Advanced treatment facilities A2/O process
                   Reaction tank
   Primary
 sedimentation
    tank
             Anaerobic
               tank
Anoxic
 tank
         Agitator
Aero
 Tan
          O
        0°o°
                             o'
                              0 0
                                 O
                              n_l
            Secondary
           sedimentation
              tank
                              Diffuser    Circulating pump
                                                        8

-------
(Ref.) Energy-saving agitator

-------
        Reduction of N2O generated in sludge
              treatment process (1/2)
 (a) High-temperature sludge incineration
          Incineration temperature and N2O emission
N2O emission
kg/DS-t
                                              70% reduction
                   810     820     830     840

                    Incineration temperature (deg C)
850 C  •••
86°
                                                      10

-------
         Reduction of N2O generated in sludge
                treatment process (2/2)
(b) Sludge carbonization
           Illustration of carbonization process
 Dewatered
   sludge
                    Dryer
                     Carbonization
                        furnace
             Incinerator
Supplemental
   fuel
  [city gas]
               Heat
\	.
t
                  Recovery of gases generated during
                          carbonization
                                      Carbonized
                                        material
 Facilities capacity:
100wt/dayx3 lines
                                                            11

-------
   Sludge carbonization project scheme
   Selection of enterprise : Public proposal
   Project term: 20 years
    Tokyo Sewerage Bureau
nDewatered
Carbonization
  process  j

Carbonized
 material
Sales
                                    Enterprise

              Batch consignment (Facility design,
           construction and operation plus carbonized
                     material sales)
 Thermal
power plant
                                                 Alternative
                                                 fuel to coal
                                                     12

-------
      Sludge carbonization facility
                                            Carbonized
                                             material
Capacity
   Sludge treatment capacity: 300 t/day [100 w t/day x 3 lines]
   Treated sludge volume : 99,000 t/year
   Carbonized material fuel generation volume: 8,700 t/year
13

-------
  Utilization of renewable energy (1/2)
(a) Micro-hydro power generation
     f                                         ~~\
      Illustration of micro-hydro power generation
     ost reduction
    Adoption of
    siphon system
    ~~
n
     Simplified
     construction
     Utilization of
   universal products
    Realization of
     cost down
                                      Siphon system
                                           Discharge
                                                     14

-------
 Utilization of renewable energy (2/2)
(b) Biomass power generation
                                             ~~"\
      Illustration of biomass power generation
   Biomass energy

    Methane gas
           ^

 Sludge treatment

   Digestion

 Wastewater
 treatment
 facilities
^—-^
   Gas engine generator
                                                    15

-------
    Coordination  with various activities
      Coordination for
       town building
                     Introduction of
                     private-sector
                       activities
   Reclaimed water
 and wastewater heat
V..
    Green electric
      jDOwer
Reduction of
greenhouse
gas emission
      Utilization of new
         system
                         PFI project
                        Joint research
                   introduction of new
                      technology

-------
Contribution to
the 10-Year Project for a
Carbon-Minus Tokyo
                       17

-------
        Outline of the 10-Year Project for a

               Carbon-Minus Tokyo

   What is the 10-Year Project for a Carbon-Minus Tokyo
>"The 10-Year Project for a Carbon-Minus Tokyo" is an approach
aiming at realization of a leading-edge environmental city with the least
environmental load in the world, looking toward an Olympic candidate
city and reformed society

 ~ Aiming at handing down a rich environment to the next generation
    through world top countermeasures against global warming ~

>lt is an approach to grade up the city model to a top class level in the
world, and to dispatch the information not only to Asia but also to the
whole world.

   Target of CO2 reduction

>Reducing the emission by 25% of the level of 2000 by the year 2020.

                                                        18

-------
  City-wide Countermeasures against Global Warming
                                  Introduction of "obligation of reduction of
                                 total emission" to large-scale corporations
         CO2 emission
         level in Tokyo
                               • Obligation of reducing the total emission of greenhouse
                       large-    § anc| introduction Of emissions trading system
                   scale
Business
and
industry :
44%
Household
24%

Transport:
30%
                                    upport to energy-saving measures t
                                   small-and-medium scale corporations
                                  Promotion of power-saving and energy-
                                           saving in household
corporations
(1300)
60% small-  * Large scale promotion of renewal of cooling/heating
and medium facilities in factories, buildings, etc.
scale
corporations
(700,000)
           • Thorough saving power
           • Promotion of installation of high-efficiency hot water
           supply units
           • Utilization of 1-million kW Solar Power
                                  Improvement in fuel consumption of
                                    automobiles and transportation
        Approximately
        60 million ton
        (As of FY2000)
                               • Promotion of eco-drive in corporations
                               • Promotion of bio-fuel utilization
                               To ensure 25% reduction of 2000 level
                                         by the year 2020
                                                    19

-------
Obligation for reduction and  means of execution

 • Gas requiring reduction in emission
   Emission of CO2 while using fuel, heat, electricity, etc.
   (ex.) Case of general
      corporations
          10,000 t-
          CO2/year
         Reference
         emission
         level
      For instance, when 10% reduction is obliged
  9,000 t-
  CO2/year
                                   1   (Basic) Self reduction
                                  o The introduction of the latest high-
                                  efficiency equipment, etc.
2   (Complementary)
Procurement of other party's
"reduced volume" (Emissions
trade)
Reduction
plan period
.o The volume beyond the emission
reduction level obliged to the party
o Purchase of green power certificate, etc.
                                                              20

-------
    Target Reduction Level in the 10-Year Project for a
                       Carbon-Minus Tokyo
      The 10-Year Project for a Carbon-
               Minus Tokyo
   The year 2000
   Overall Tokyo:
Approx. 61.8 million
                          Tokyo Sewerage
                              Bureau

                        Approx. 1 million ton-CO
                         (43% of the total emission for
                        administrative works and projects
                       of Tokyo Metropolitan Government)
                                                              2
               25% reduction of the 2000 level
                      by the year 2020

   The year 2020
 Target emission level

Arox463 ™'
                           Target emission level
                          Approx. 750,000 t-CO2
Realization of a city model with the least environmental load in the world
                                                              21

-------
  Contents of greenhouse gas emission in FY2006
       in Tokyo Metropolitan Sewerage Bureau
N,O etc. from
Others
wastewater treatment (100,000 t-CO;
(140,000 t-CO2)
        •"••M

        Power consumption
          iZQ.OOO t- CO2)
              N2O etc. from
              sludge incineration
              (300,000 t-CO2)
                        Total emission in FY2006 :
                              916,000 t-CO?
                                                22

-------
            Reduction of power consumption
  Power consumption
Approx. 370,000 t-CO:
(Emission level for FY2006)
Development and
 introduction of
 energy-saving
 system of the
entire sewerage
  facilities in
coordination with
 private sectors
i Development and introduction
i of energy-saving technology
j for aeration system
ithat consumes huge power

                                    : Development and introduction
                                    i of low-power sludge thickening
                                    i and dewatering facilities for
                                    j realization of drastic energy
                                    i saving
                                                              23

-------
          Reduction of N2O generated in sludge
                    incineration process
 N2O emission due to
  sludge incineration
Approx. 300,000 t-CO2
(Emission level for FY2006)  Switching to
         • *
         • *
               I Carbonizing furnace
               i Here, carbonized material is
               I produced from sludge for use as
               jan alternative fuel in coal-burned
               i thermal power plants.
                   incineration
            \  \ Gasification furnace
new technology   j Here, the organic content of sludge
  ™™™e^°nf iis gasified (CO • H2) to generate
               i electric power.
                                 i Woody biomass co-incineration
                                  facility
                                  Here, wooden chips are used as
                                 i auxiliary fuel for incinerator, etc.
                                                             24

-------
                  Gasification furnace
           Image of Gasification furnace
Dewatere
  sludge
               ^    '   Furnace of making Reforming
                       to sludge gas    furnace
 Gas
engine
Generator
                                      Electric power
                                                            25

-------
Greenhouse gas emission from
 sludge incineration processing
                Normal incineration of 800 deg C
                High temperature incineration of 850 deg C
                         Sludge carbonization
                               Sludge gasification
                                            26

-------
        Joint Research on New Solar-Photovoltaic
                       Generation System
                                             Experimental power
                                             generation scale: 1 kW
                         Interlocked with
                         solar orientation
 Experimental facility above
wastewater treatment facility
            Uniaxial tracking type               Fixed-mount type

    [Outline of the research]
   We conducted demonstration experiment of the "new photovoltaic generation
      system" by combining "uniaxial tracking" type with thin-film solar battery,
      aiming at improving the power generation efficiency.
                                                                 27

-------
     Effect of Global Warming Mitigation
         and Energy-saving measures

^ Improvement in  ^
    sewerage service
 •  Creation of more safe and comfortable urban
 space for the next generation through mitigation of
 global warming and energy saving

  High-efficiency of work
 •  Power and fuel cost reduction by switching to energy-
 saving system (aeration, dewatering, gasification furnace,
 etc.)
 •  Improvement in sludge recycling rate through
 installation of sludge carbonization facility          28

-------
           Thank  You
http://www.gesui.metro.tokyo.jp/
                        'Earth-kim" is the Mascot of
                         Tokyo Sewerage Bureau
29

-------
        Emerging Contaminants
(Endocrine Disrupters, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, etc)

-------
                  Emerging Contaminants
(Endocrine Disrupters, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, etc)
 Emerging Contaminants in Drinking Water and
                 Future Directions
                     Dr. MariAsami
         Chief, Division of Water Quality Management
           Department of Water Supply Engineering
              National Institute of Public Health

-------
Emerging Contaminants
  in  Drinking Water and
    Future Directions
                  Japan - U.S. Joint Conference
               On Drinking Water Quality Management
                    and Wastewater Control
                       March 2-5, 2009


                      Mari ASAMI
               National Institute of Public Health
   National Institute of Public Health

-------
       Japanese Water Quality Standard
                   and Related  Items
Water Quality Standard
    (Water Works Law)


  Management Items
   (Director Notice, 2003)
Items for Further Study
  (Advisory Council, 2003)
^Undefined toxicological evaluation

>No sufficient data in purified water

KO items listed for investigation
•Water works' responsibility for analysis

•Compulsory periodical investigation

•Heavy metals and chemicals detected above
10% of target values

•31 Health related items + 20 Deteriorates

• Director's request for analysis

•Subsidiary to the Water Quality Standard

•Items of provisional target values and low
level detection

•Important items for water quality
management

• 15 Health related items including total of
102 agricultural chemicals + 12 Deteriorates
              Subject to Rolling Revision

-------
Japanese Water Quality Standard -Health Related Items
No
Item
(mg/l)
No
Item
(mg/l)
 1  Standard Plate Count
 2  E Co//
 3  Cadmium
 4  Chromium (IV)
 5  Mercury
 6  Selenium
 7  Lead
 8  Arsenic
 9  Cyanide ion and Cyanogen Chloride
10 Nitrate and Nitrite
11 Fluoride
12 Boron
13 Carbon tetrachloride
14 1,4-dioxane
15 1,1-dichloroethylene
           100 colonies/ml
        Not to be detected
                      0.01
                      0.05
                     0.0005
                      0.01
                      0.01
                      0.01
                      0.01
                      10
                      0.8
                       1
                     0.002
                      0.05
                      0.02
          16  c/5-l,2-Dichloroethylene
          17  Dichloromethane
          18  Tetrachloroethylene
          19  Trichloroethylene
          20  Benzene
          21  Chlorate
          22  Bromate
          23  Chloroform
          24  Dibromochloromethane
          25  Bromodichloromethane
          26  Bromoform
          27  Total trihalomethanes
          28  Chloroacetic acid
          29  Dichloroacetic acid
          30  Trichloroacetis acid
          31  Formaldehyde
                                  0.04
                                  0.02
                                  0.01
                                  0.03
                                  0.01
                                  0.6
                                  0.01
                                  0.06
                                  0.1
                                  0.03
                                  0.09
                                  0.1
                                  0.02
                                  0.04
                                  0.2
                                  0.08

-------
Japanese Water Quality Standard -Deteriorates
No Item
32 Zinc
33 Aluminum
34 Chloride Ion
35 Hardness (Ca,Mg)
36 Iron
37 Copper
38 Sodium
39 Manganese
40 Anionic surfactants
41 Geosmin
(mg/l)
1
0.2
200
300
0.3
1
200
0.05
0.2
0.00001
Item
Nonionic surfactants
43 Phenols
2-Methylisobolneol
Organic substances (TOC)
46 Taste
47 Color
48 Odor
49 Total residue
50 Turbidity
51 pH
(mg/l)
0.02
0.005
0.00001
5
Not abnormal
5 unit
Not abnormal
500
2 unit
5.8-8.6
\ National Institute of Public Health

-------
     Chlorate  (  C  I  O3-  )

First thought as a DBFs in chlorine dioxide, but
found as a major DBP in hypochlorite.

Chlorate is introduced to a new standard in Apr.
2008. The target value is 0.6mg/L
 cf. WHO 0.7mg/L, CA 0.2mg/L

Standard for Water Supply Chemicals is
 0.5mg/L at the maximum dose expected,
 which would be lower to 0.4mg/L.
  National Institute of Public Health

-------
   Items exceeding 10, 50 and 100% of
            the Standard value
Cases
  /
 Year 100°
DO
00
00
00
00
00
»^/-v.
V-/-X.
20
15
10
5
0
S





id
~












	 i 	







i




:


!
























—
elenium Nitrate Bon
Arsenic Fluoride





















>n Brc
Chlorate









































-




n n 1 n%
1-1 U~ 1 U /O
n >50%
_ v.1 nn%
n -•* i uu /o







mate BDCM
THM Aluminum
    National Institute of Public Health

-------
      Chlorate in  Bottled  Water

Water supply
Natural*
Bottled
Tea
Soft drink
Detec
tion
5/5
34/49
9/10
23/25
14/17
Max
120
100
110
700
310
Chlorate (uq/L
<10

46
8
23

<100
4
2
1
1
1
<600
1
1
1
0
7
.)
600<
0
0
0
1
0
"Natural water" includes 3 supplied water containing >10 mg/L of
chlorate, which should have labeled "water supply" water
  i National Institute of Public Health
                                                  1

-------
Chlorate in soft drinks according to their
          production company
     400
     300
  ro
  _o

  6
     200
100
      0
         AAAAAABBBCDDDEMNO
              Production company
                                         8
  : National Institute of Public Health

-------
     Management of Agricultural Chemicals
 Water Quality Standard(O)
 Management Items (102)
Second candidate group(27)
 Third candidate group(79)
                                •Chemicals detected above 10% of target
                                values

•None of agricultural chemicals categorized
as water quality standard
•Available analytical methods
•Domestic shipping over 50 tons/year or
detection history
•Management as
"Total Agricultural Chemicals"
-total sum of detected values        £)y
 divided by target values    ^=: / A
 •No available analytical methods for water
 •Estimated domestic shipping over 50 tons/year

 •Estimated domestic shipping below 50 tons/year
       i National Institute of Public Health
        MHLW Advisory Council, 2003

-------
      Agricultural chemicals (Dl: total sum of
   detected values divided  by each target value)
  1.0
  U.B
O 0,6
"co
O
0)
•5
0)
-i—•
0)
Q
  0.4
  0.2
  0.0
          River
          Raw water
          Finished Water
                                     Isoproturon
                                     Fenthione and oxides

                                     Mefenacet
                                Phenthoate

                                Cafenstrole
     2004                2005
I National Institute of Public Health
                                                2006
                                                        10

-------
       Perchlorate  in  dairy milk
           12,1-14.0
           14.1-15.4
Dyke, J. V., Ito, K., Obitsu, T., Hisamatsu, Y., Dasgupta, P. K., Blount,
B. C.: Perchlorate in dairy milk. Comparison of Japan versus the
United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol.41, No.1, pp.88-92 (2007)

-------
Perchlorate concentration in raw and
       finished water in Japan
CD
"03
_o
o
CD
Q_
   20
   15
10
                            Raw
                            Finished
    0
    \°
 National Institute oj Public Health
                                        12

-------
    Perchlorate in the Tone River
                               Perchlorate (|ng/L )
                  Tone River
    Ara
   River
  1-10
  10-20
 20-100
100-1,000
  1,000<
                                           13
• ; National Institute of Public Health

-------
  NDMA,  dimethylnitrosoamine in  Raw
                Water in Winter
                             N;N-Dimethylnitr o s o amine
                                    CH3
South
Kyushu
Okinawa -
Other Islands
NDMA
USEPA : 7ng/L
  ( 10~5 cancer risk
WHOGL  : 100ng/L
                                                   O North
                                                   • East
                                                    Cent rail
                                                   x Central2
                                                   •West
                                                   °CS
                                                   + South'!
                                                    South2
   i National Institute of Public Health
                               01234
                                TN concentration in RawV\feter (mg/ L)  14

-------
   Detection of NDMA in raw and
             finished water
c
g
IS
c
CD
o
o
 10.0
  8.0
6.0
  4.0
  2.0
  0.0
      Summer
                     10.0
                     8.0
6-0
                    CD
                    O
                    § 4.0
                    o
                     2.0
                     0.0
                         Writer
                  AWTPin
                  the West
                  using
                  Ozonation
        Raw   Finished
                           Raw
            Finished
 National Institute of Public Health
                                              15

-------
   Fate of NDMA during ozonation in WTPs
   25

   20

   15

-------
NDMA and NDMAFP in Ozonation in the Yodo River Basin in the West
                 Cone.  Load
                 (ng/L) (g/day)
           Upper: NDMA
         Lower: NDMA-OFP
Cone. Load
(ng/L) (g/day)
1.2 1.2
*\ • x- ..
JK1
2.4 2.3
Katsura
River
I
11 16 c
JK9 -
I\Z
| 36 54






Uji
River
I


Yodo
River
I
Y1<
Cone. Load
(ng/L) (g/day)
                                                        20
                                                        37
                                                        24
                                                        30
                       1.8   23

                       16   200
                                                                         17
       i National Institute of Public Health

-------
NDMA and NDMAFP in Ozonation in a Sewage Treatment Plant
Cone. Load
(ng/L) (g/day)
42 2.2
100 5.4

71 2.1
460 13



83 2.4
470 14
• Sampling point
Upper: NDMA
Lower: NDMA-OFP
Influent 1
r
I
Primary
sedimentation 1
I
Biological
treatment 1

Second
sedimentation 1
1

Cl7r

Influent 2
T 1
1
Primary
sedimentation 2
I
Biological
treatment 2

Second
sedimentation 2
I

nation |
Effluent


Cone. Load
(ng/L) (g/day)
^* 710 3.8
k 10,000 54
N 	 	
130 4.0
1,800 55
130 3.8
450 14
450 26
— ""
                                                       18
      National Institute of Public Health

-------
Formation of NDMA during ozonation
        of the Yodo River water
"c
c
.g
 CD
 O
 c
 O
 O
   20
15
10
    0
      0
                   NDMA
                   Residual Ozone
                           0.6
                           0.4
                           0
          5    10    15
           Ozonation (min)

National Institute of Public Health
                         20
 CD

 I
 CO
                           0.2  1
Ozonation Condition
-Water Volume 1 litter
-Water Temp. 20 °C
-Ozone Gas 5mg/L
-Ozone Gas Flow 0.5L/min
            19

-------
Identification of Anti-Yellow Agents as a
     precursor of NDMA in ozonation
tu
35
^
§30
c
§ 25
+=
2
c 20

-------
 Chemicals found in aquatic environment,
6 chemicals detected
  among 33 chemicals in
  the Broadrange Survey

• 17p-estradiol
• Estron
• 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
• Polyoxyethylene
  alkylether
• Polyoxyethylene
  nonylphenylether
• 2-Methoxy-5-methyl
  aniline
8 chemicals detected
  among 13 chemicals in
  the Detailed Survey

• Bisphenol A
• EDTA
• p-Octylphenol
• p-Dichlorobenzene
• N,N-Dimethylformamide
• Nonylphenol
• PFOA
• PFOS
    i National Institute of Public Health
                            Ministry of Environment 2006
                      21

-------
PFOA and PFOS in Japan, 2007
                                                     -10-20-30-70(ng/l)
       South
       Kyushu
       Okinawa -
       Other Islands
               North
               Hokkaido
               Tohoku
  entral
Chubu
                                   East
                                   Kanto
                                                  Summer/Winter
                                                          /
                               Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2007

-------
Distribution of the PPCPs in 37 major Japanese
rivers and population density  of the catchments
»- «N
ririV
                               -0- Population density
                               n Cretfiinitan
                               • Ibup-'olen
                               Q Nsproxen
                               Fl Fsnoprofeo
                               t_J Mefenamic ackt
                               U Ketc proton
                               D Prapyphenazone
                                Ethenazamide
                                Tridosan
                                Thymol
                                Dtethyliotuamide
                                Cfjrl:-;-:ri:i,'i2f..iiic
                                             10,000
       fl.OOO ,---
       e,ooo g a)
           S
           75
       4,000 b
           a
                                             2,000
  Nakada et al., Environ. Sci. Techno!.,
  42(17), 6347-6353, 2008
     National Institute of Public Health
CVI « Td- Lf> «O N-
m ft «• n- fO c*»
o: a a f> o: QC

-------
  Examples of the
  at drinking water
Pharmaceuticals detected
treatment plants  in Japan
Pharmaceuticals
Aspirin
Ibuprofen
Acetaminophen
Ketoprofen
Indometacin
lopamidol
lopromide
Sulfisozole Sodium
Sulfamethoxazole
Sulfadimethoxine
LoD
(ng/L)
2
0.4
4
0.8
0.4
8
8
1
0.6
2
LoQ
(ng/L)
6
2
20
3
2
30
30
3
2
6
Concentration in raw water
at drinking water treatment plants
(ng/L)
A B C D E F G
784825 N.D.
1.7 2 N.D. N.D. 0.7 2.8 N.D.
8 N.D. 7 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
N.D. N.D. 5.7 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
4.9 4.4 33 0.9 1.1 8.3 N.D.
32 9 25 N.D. N.D. 15 N.D.
N.D. 9 12 N.D. N.D. 14 N.D.
N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. 4 7 N.D.
3 3.4 10 0.8 N.D. 5 9
N.D. N.D. 45 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
27 out of 60 Pharmaceuticals were detected from raw water.
Most of the Pharmaceuticals were removed by advanced drinking water treatments.
                                                    24
     National Institute of Public Health

-------
Pharmaceuticals detected* in
finished water (2005-2007)



Fenofibrate
Diclofenac
Carbamazepine

Detection
Limit
(ng/L)
0.2
2.5
0.2

Max
Cone
C(ng/
31
16
25
Minimum
Daily
Dose
D(mg)
100
25
200
Max
Relative
Intake**
(C/D)
1.6X10-7
3.2X1 0-7
6.2X10-8
These are only Pharmaceuticals detected out of 60 Pharmaceuticals investigated in
finished water of 6 WTPs during 2005-2007. **Max relative intake was calculated using
the maximum concentration among the data obtained 2005-2007, that was divided by the
Minimum Daily Dose in the literature, assuming 2 litter of daily water consumption.

   ii National Institute of Public Health
                                                 25

-------
Priority setting for Pharmaceuticals



=detected in
environment
Haloperidol
Tetracycline
Hydralazine
Ephedrine
Dichlofenac
Valproic acid
Caffeine
Pantethine
Production
1
1
2
1
2
4
3
3
Urinary
excretion
1
1
4
5
1
4
1

Solubility
2
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
Biodegradation
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
Reduction

1


1

5

O)
c
8
12
14
14
12
16
16
12
?!
CD 3'
§1
o
03
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
3
73
9*
o'
"55
8.0
6.0
4.7
4.7
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
                                       26
   National Institute of Public Health

-------



=detected in
environment
Furosemide
Chlorpheniramine
Maleate
Acetaminophen
Ketoprofen
Sulpiride
Sulpyrine
Sotalol
Bezafibrate
Levofloxacin
Production
1

4
3
3
3



Urinary
excretion
5

1
1
5
4
4
4
5
Solubility
3
5
4
3
4
5
4
2
5
Biodegradation
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
Reduction


3
5



5

0)
c
3
&
12
8
15
15
15
15
11
14
14
of
C/) ^.
CD 3
si
D
Q)
*<"
3
2
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
73
^
o"
'o?
5
4.0
4.0
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.5
3.5
                                                                                 27
National Institute of Public Health

-------
   Priority Setting for Chemical Management
                  for Water Supply
        Area Specific
Exposure/
Standard
(Reference
  Value)
Perchlorate
  NDMA
PFOA PFOS
Nitrate Nitrite
  Arsenic
  Fluoride
                    Relative to Water
Supply Chemicals
   Chlorate
  THMs HAAs
   Bromate
  Aluminum
    Lead


Physiologically
    Active
Agri Chem, PPCPs
                                       Hydrophobia, Highly Toxic
                                   BisA, POPs, Dioxins, PAHs
                                                      28
       National Institute of Public Health

-------
  Priority Setting for Chemical Management
                   in Water Source
         Area Specific
Existence/
Standard
 (Target
 Value)
Perchlorate

  NDMA

PFOA PFOS

Nitrate Nitrite

  Arsenic  Physiologically Active

  Fluoride    Agri Chem, PPCPs
                                    Hydrophobia, Highly Toxic
                                   BisA, POPs, Dioxins, PAHs
         Hydrophilic
         = Must be Controlled in Water Source
      i National Institute of Public Health
                             Hydrophobic
                              = Rather Reductive
                                                       29

-------
Emerging Contaminants in Drinking Water
           and Future Directions
  • Few chemicals of large quantity
           -»•   Many chemicals of small quantity
  • Hydrophobic chemicals ( Dioxin, Halogenated
    Organics) -»• Hydrophilic, polar chemicals
                (Chlorate, Perchlorate, NDMA)
  • Intensive evaluation of exposure and reference
    value is needed !!
Strategic Approach is needed for management of
Industrial Chemicals, Water Supply Chemicals including
By-products, Natural Substances and PPCPs.
                                             30
   i National Institute of Public Health

-------
                   Emerging Contaminants
  (Endocrine Disrupters, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, etc)
Occurrence and Relevance of Trace Pharmaceuticals
                   in Drinking Water
                      Dr. Shane Snyder
                   R&D Project Manager
            Applied Research and Development Center
                Southern Nevada Water Authority

-------
  Occurrence and Relevance of Trace
   Pharmaceuticals in Drinking Water
          Shane Snyder, Ph.D.
        Applied R&D Center - SNWA
LAS VEGAS VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT
Southern Nevada
Water Authority
  PEOPIE
  LEADING
                                   COMMUNITY SERVICE ENVIRONMLKT

-------
    R&D Manager
     David Rexing
Administrative Support
     Linda Parker
  Research Chemists
Doug Mawhinney, Ph.D.
    Oscar Quinones
   Rebecca Trenholm
    Brett Vanderford
     Janie Zeigler
      Analysts
    Jasmin Koster
   Shannon Ferguson

-------
 Post-Doctoral Researchers
  Mark Benotti, Ph.D. (SUNY)
  Daniel Gerrity, Ph.D. (ASU)
  Ben Stanford, Ph.D. (UNC)
Yongrui Tan, Ph.D. (Rensselear)

 Research Student Interns
  Susanna Blunt (UNLV-DRI)
  Deborah Dryer (U of Wash)
      Elaine Go (UNLV)
     Christy Meza (UNLV)
 Aleks Pisarenko (Miami U OH)
     Sarper Sarp (GIST)
 Richard Stein (Colorado State)

        Engineering
          Julia Lew
 Samantha Stoughtenberg, P.E.
       EricWert, P.E.

-------
 Former Team Members
Post-Doctoral Researchers
 Hongxia Lei (Golden State W)
Fernando Rosario (UC Boulder)
 Research Student Interns
   Tony Baik(U. of Buffalo)
 Spencer Porter (Oregon SU)
  Fernando Rosario (UCLA)
     Yixin Wei (UNLV)
       Mei Xin (UNR)
      Partnerships
    Applied Biosystems
        AquaPure
     General Electric
       Hydranautics
         SeaAIR
    Trojan Technologies
    SeaHERO - Korea
 SE Queensland - Australia

-------
I   .   i.i
1     •
                         •••••».  *.—•

                                                                 -
                                                                                                                                             -•- ••


-------
I

-------

-------
     Las Vegas -  1985
      Return Flow Credit Established:
 Water returned to the Colorado earns credit to
withdraw an equivalent amount of drinking water
                40%

-------




-------

-------
   U.S. Department of the Interior—U.S. Geological Survey

                     SYNTHETIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND
                     CARP  ENDOCRINOLOGY AND  HISTOLOGY
                     IN  LAS VEGAS WASH AND LAS VEGAS  AND
                                             _  OF LAKE  MEAD,  NEVADA.
                             AND            ^
                                                                                   Nevada Basin and Range Study Unii
      ter-Reaourees investigations Meport 96-4266                        National Water-Quality Assessment Program
By Hugh E. Bevans1. Steven L. Goodbre-rF. John F. Miesner3, Sharon A. Watkins1, Timothy S. Gross4. Nancy D. Denslow4.
   and Trenton Schoeb"
 ABSTRACT

     The Nevada Basin and Range study unit of the National
 Waler-QuaKly Assessment Program. LT.S. Geological Survey,
 in cooperation wilh the National Park Service. National
 Biological Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.,
 investigated the occurrence of organocrhlorin ilian in Callville Bay (the reference site) for the
 three media lluii were sampled. Results of n carp-li&sue bio-
 assay indicated  the presence of dioxins or  funtns with low
 loxic-equivalent factors relative 10 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorod3henzo-
 fi-dio.\in in Las  Vegas Wash and Las Vegas and Callville Bays.
 Patterns of necrosis observed in hcpailopanereas and kidney
 samples from earp are consistent with long-term suhchronic
 exposure to Toxicants. Polycyclic aromaiic hydrocarbons,
 phthaJatcs. and  phenols Lilso were delected ai higher concen-
 trations in bottom -sediment samples from  Las Vegas Bay than
 ill a comparable: sample front Cailvilte Bay. MntycycNc
 aromitlic hydnL»carbun> were delected in samples from seini-
 pcrmeable nvembranc devices from all sitcs.
     Endocrine disruption in carp from Las Vega^ %\'ash
Bay. H-S eompared to Callville Ba%. is evktenced by high con-
centration b. of 1 l-ketertestnsferotie levels in blood-plasma
sample* of female carp in l.;is Vfgas Wnsli. low
in malt- csirp from I.JL* Vegn% Bay. and  low l~[J-eMradiol
cenlralions in male cam from l^ss Vejias Bay. Tine most com-
pelling evidence of endocrine disruption is ihe prw.venve of
vitellogenin in hlood-plasma samples of male carp from I .as
Vegas Wash and Bay and elevated concentrations in fem;iK'
carp from 1 -ts Vegas Bay.
     Many of the omanoehlorincs and ^emivolatile induslrial
compound-Si detected in semipemieahle membrane devices,
bottom sediment, ami carp tissue from Las Vega* Wash anil
Bay have been linked to endocrine disruption in fish by pre-
vious investigations of olher areas. The endocrine disruption
nhi-erved in carp front 1-as Vegas Wash and Bay could he due
to the presence of (hese compounds.
F
Aerial view of lower Las Vegas Wash and Las Vegas Bay of
Lake Mead. View to the northwest. Oct. 12, 1995. Photograph
by A.S. VanD-enburgh.

-------
cnviflonnienTflLT
 S  A • JAN. 1, 1998 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / NEWS
I     Human  estrogens  linked to endocrine disruption
            For the first time in North
            America, high levels of natu-
            ral and synthetic hormones
         in municipal wastewater treat-
         ment plant effluent have been
         linked with endocrine disruption
         in fish. The study by researchers
         at Michigan State University's De-
         partment of Zoology indicates
         that human hormones, not indus-
         trial chemicals, in the effluent
         caused male fish to produce vitel-
         logenin, a well-accepted indicator
         of endocrine disruption.
           "This is a significant, if not a
         surprising, result," commented
         Gary Ankley, an EPA toxicologist
         who studies endocrine disrupters.
         The results were similar to find-
         ings published last year by U.K.
         researchers that identified hor-
         mones secreted in women's urine
         as the cause of vitellogenesis in
         caged fish exposed to sewage ef-
         fluent in U.K. waters.
High levels of a female protein in male fish found in Lake Mead, Nev., led to a search
for the cause in the effluent-dominated waters of the Las Vegas Wash. (Courtesy Shane
Snyder, Michigan State University)
the compounds that were likely
to act like estrogens in the fish.
They also used an innovative
method that involves solid-phase
extraction and in vitro cellular
bioassays to detect endocrine-
modulating compounds in com-
plex aqueous mixtures. Of the
the highest level of estrogen ic ac-
tivity in effluent downstream from
a small plant (55,000 gal/day) vvith
relatively few treatment processes.
  Results from a companion
Michigan State study, in which
caged fish were exposed to Mich-
igan wastewater effluent, suggest

-------
                        1999 Environ. Sci.  Tech. 33(16) 2814-2829
Analytical Methods  for Detection of

Selected Estrogenic  Compounds in

Aqueous  Mixtures

SHANE  A.  SNYDER.'-t
TIMOTHY L. KEITH.t
DAVID  A. VERB RUG GE.t
ERIN M.  SNYDER.t  TIMOTHY  S, GROSS,*
KURUNTH ACH ALAM KANNAN,* AND
JOHN P.  GIESY*
National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, Department of
Zoology, and Institute of Environmental Toxicology, Michigan
State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1311, and
                              can operate through a number of both direct and Indirect
                              mechanisms of action,  of particular concern are those
                              compounds that mimic  endogenous estrogens. The Safe
                              Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1995 (Bill No. 5,1316)
                              and the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (Bill No. P.L
                              104-170). which  mandate comprehensive screening for
                              estrogenic and anti-estrogenic chemicals, are examples of
                              the increasing public concern regarding endocrine disrup-
                              tion. While it Is known  that many natural and synthetic
                              chemicals are estrogenic, it is unclear whether the concen-
                              trations of estrogenic agents present in the environment are
                              sufficient to cause adverse physiological effects. One aspect
                              of conducting human or wildlife risk assessments is an
                              exposure assessment. This suggests the need for assays and
                              techniques to monitor the quantity and effects of endocrine
TABLE 3. Concentrations of Selected Kenoestrogens in Water Samples (Corrected for Recovery)
       location            date        NPIngJLl      OP(ng/L)       NPE{ng/L)
  LV Wash3
  LVBay

  LV Marina
  Saddle Island5
  CallvilleBay
4/30/97
4/30/97*
9/5/97
9/5/97
4/30/97
9/5/97
1140 ±28
750 ±34
160
nd
nd
nd
Lake Mead
  43±9
  27 ±7
  ndc
  nd
  nd
  nd
8990 ±230
4850 ±122
3180
nd
nd
nd
  E2(pg/L)


2670 ± 152
2210 ±175
188
270
nd
nd
 EE2(pg/L)


480 ±68
520±117
253
nd
nd
nd

-------
LAS^EGAS  SUN
   *,            MONDAY,  OCTOBER  IB
CONTAMINANTS
Toxicology studies of the Las
Vegas Wash and the las Vegas
Bay have revealed traces of;
• Pesticides such as DOT and
• Boat fuel compounds
• Oral contraceptives
• Seizure drugs such as
Dllantin
• Pain medication such as
hydrocodone and codeine
• Valium
• Robitussln
• Blood thinner such as
Trental
Traces of drugs found in LV Wash
Effects on area's water supply unknown
By Mary Manning
LAS VEGAS SUN

 Pill-popping, sun screen-smearing
people living in and visiting Southern
Nevada are leaving traces of drugs, de-
tergents and DDT in the Las Vegas
Wash.
 The good news is that the contami-
nant levels discovered in the wash and
the Las Vegas Bay are so low they
might not disrupt human health. But
scientists are still concerned over what
they don't know about the new discov-
ery — how it might affect the environ-
ment and water supplies.
 The Las Vegas Wash runs into Lake
Mead, where Southern Nevada draws
most of its drinking water.
 Scientists had found pestiddes and
detergents in the wash before, but this
is the first time the presence of pre-
scription and nonprescription drugs -
as well as one pesticide previously
only suspected, tindane - - has been
confirmed.
 'Ilie Southern Nevada Water Au-
thority first guessed drugs may be
finding their way into the Las Vegas
Valley's wastewater after German and
British studies found evidence of pre-
scription and over-the-counter drugs in
the water supplies of their countries.
 But now research by University of
Michigan lexicologist Shane Snyder,
hired by the water authority to test

          See Drugs, 4A

-------
              Wastewater Treatment
Cities
^Cincinnati
^Kansas City
^-New York City
^Boston
Cities
 *-Chicago
-^Salt Lake City
->• Dayton, OH
 ^Charlotte, NC
Cities
^Atlanta
->• Denver
^Washington, DC
>- Phoenix
Cities
'-Minneapolis
^Greenville, SC
^Hagerstown, MD
>-Escambia County, FL
                      z:
                              32%
                               25%
                         Better Treatment
                    Secondary, Carbonaceous only

                    Secondary, w/ nitrification

                    Advanced secondary w/ NO3 OR P rem

                    Advanced secondary w/ full BNR

                    Advanced trtmt targeting parameters in addn to N&P
                                  Only 2 Areas
                                  ->• Las Vegas
                                  >~Scottsdale, AZ

-------
Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents
Analyte
Hydrocodone
Trimethoprim
Acetaminophen
Caffeine
Erythromycin-H2O
Sulfamethoxazole
Fluoxetine
Meprobamate
Dilantin
TCEP
Carbamazepine
DEET
Atrazine
lopromide
Naproxen
Ibuprofen
Diclofenac
Triclosan
ppt
256
37
<5.0
51
144
878
19
351
167
388
221
193
<5.0
27
13
19
59
101
ppt
232
33
<5.0
50
128
831
18
333
153
376
205
191
<5.0
18
13
18
52
78
ppt
14
10
7.8
362
8.9
3.8
<1.0
<1.0
8.8
92
73
6.4
<1.0
1340
118
82
8.8
6.3
ppt
<10
44
19
776
33
<10
<10
<10
20
205
147
21
<10
4030
483
137
11
<10
ppt
83
1.0
<1.0
<10
39
24
52
444
685
213
433
39
601
4.9
<1.0
103
<1.0
<1.0

-------
    Awwa
    Research
    Foundation
Advancing the Science of Water*
Removal of EDCs
and Pharmaceuticals
in Drinking and Reuse
Treatment Processes
moval of EDCs
d  Pharmaceuticals
Drinking and Reuse
>atment Processes
                                          A. Snydar, Eric C. Weft and Hongxia (Dawn) Lei
                                          Xiality Researdh and Development Dvision
                                          n Nevada Water Authority. Henderson, NV 39015
                                          eelerhoff and Yeomin Yoon
                                            of Orvil and Environmental Englne«rirg
                                          I State Urilversity, Tempe, AZ 85287
Subject Area:
High-Quality VUater

                                          Sid by:
                                          Research Foundation
                                          lest Qulncy Avenue. Denver. CO 80235-3098
                                           I by:
                                           Awwa
                                           Research
                                          L. Foundation
             4\\
             American Water Works
             Association
Publishing

-------

-------
    Awwa
    Research
    . Foundation
Aavlnc-ng lh« ttluxx of VV«tsr»
                              California Urban
                              Water Agencies
Tailored Collaboration
Toxicological  Relevance
of EDCs and Pharmaceuticals
in  Drinking Water
Subject Area:
Environmental Leadership
                                               Toxicological Relevance
                                               of  EDCs and Pharmaceuticals
                                               in Drinking Water
                                               Prepared by:
                                               Shane A. Snyder and Rebecca A. Trenholm
                                               Southern Nevada Water Authority
                                               Applied Research and Development Center, Henderson, NV 89015
                                               Erin NL Snyder, Gretchen M. Bruce, and Richard C. Pleus
                                               Intertox, Inc , Seattle, WA 98121
                                               and
                                               Jocelyn D.C. Hemming
                                               Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene
                                               2601 Agnoltire Drive, Madison, Wl 63718

                                               Jointly sponsored by:
                                               Awwa Research Foundation
                                               6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, CO 80235-3098
                                               WaleReuse Foundation
                                               California Urban Water Agencies
                                               and
                                               Tailored Collaboration partners;
                                               Southern Nevada Water Authority and otneroo-fundlng utilities
                                                                      Distnbuted by:
                                                     Awwa
                                                     Research
                                                     Foundation
                                                                      Amtfluin Wiite-r Wena
                                                                                PubisNng

-------
                              Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7312-7320
Analysis of Pharmaceuticals in
Water by Isotope  Dilution Liquid
Chromatography/Tandem  Mass
Spectrometiy*
BRETT  J. VANDERFORD* AND
SHANE  A. SNYDER
Southern Nevada Water Authority, 1350 Richard Bunker
Avenue, Henderson, Nevada 89015
pensate for matrix effects by using different calibration
techniques, including standard addition (13,17,22), surrogate
monitoring (15,20), and various forms of internal calibration
(14—16,19,23). Still more have been developed to minimize
matrix effects using different extraction, cleanup and elution
techniques, including size-exclusion chromatography (18,
24), solid-phase extraction (22), LC chromatographic pro-
cedures (14,22), ultra performance liquid chromatography
(25), hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction (26), flow-
splitting and reduced eluent flow rates (24, 27). However,
most become problematic when applied to the simultaneous
analysis of a broad range of compounds that encompass
many different classes and structures in matrices having
varying degrees of suppression and enhancement.	
                                                                                           CHEMOSPHERE
              ELSEVIER
Chemosphcrc 65 (2006) I99O 1998
                 Broad range analysis of endocrine disrupters  and  pharmaceuticals
                   using gas chromatography and  liquid chromatography tandem
                                                mass  spectrometry

                            Rebecca A.  I renholtn *,  Brett J. Vanderford, Janie C. Holady,
                                           David J. Rexing,  Shane A. Snyder

-------
                ADI  =  Highest NOAEL or lowest LOAEL
                               Uncertainty factors
     t
Dose
NOAEL
         UFof 10 for animal to
                       UF of 3 for
                       "normal" to
                        sensitive
                         human
                           F of 10 for
                           database

-------
    Samples collected per time zone
AwwaRF #3085 "Tox. Relevance of EDCs and Pharms in Drinking Water"

-------
 US Drinking Water Project - Target Compound List
Pharmaceuticals (20)    Potential EDCs (26)   Steroid Hormones (5)  Phytoestrogens (11)
 Atenolol
 Atorvastatin
 o-Hydroxy atorvastatin
 p-Hydroxy atorvastatin
 Carbarn azepine
 Diazepam
 Diclofenac
 Dilantin
 Enalapril
 Fluoxetine
 Norfluoxetine
 Gemfibrozil
 Me pro bam ate
 Naproxen
 Risperidone
 Simvastatin
 Simvastatin hydroxy acid
 Sulfamethoxazole
 Triclosan
 Trimethoprim
Atrazine
Benzophenone
BHA
BHT
cc-BHC
P-BHC
y-BHC
8-BHC
Bisphenol A
Butylbenzyl phthalate
DEBT
Diazinon
Dioctyl phthalate
Galaxolide
Linuron
Methoxychlor
Metolachlor
Musk ketone
Nonylphenol
Octachlorostyrene
Octylphenol
TCEP
TCPP
Tonalide
Traseolide
Vinclozolin
Estradiol
Estrone
Ethinylestradiol
Progesterone
Testosterone
Apigenin
Biochanin A
Chrysin
Coumestrol
Daidzein
Equol
Formononetin
Genistein
Glycitein
Matairesinol
Naringenin

-------
                    Recent History
Meds lurk in drinking water
AP probe- found traces of i
            MM
10
A V.1
hOTT
tea:

Tot
bill:
    Mutated fish
    PharmaoEutic-als. in di
BY J«l' Ocinn,
The
    1M3 b n P- Hw
LAKE
Crithl
Few rules f
No notarial star
BY J*l' Bonn, Mirfch
The .i i>u'.id1«; J f
       n P- Ti*
         PHILADELPHIA • li
         these rls'tn: as put
         cholera and typhal
                       ^i i ng to n p o 5 ic om
                   AP Warei  Probe Prompts Senate
    By MAJOT-CA
    TfeLr
                 I ],
                                         :21 .
-- Two
-, q
J ."
                                             ro
           E ic. respciLie ^D o AisocLaied
                 Ji'G :h.€-p-es5ace of raze
                                                               s of
                                                            ie> c-f ?.r
                     it - L milkoi:
         Tracts at 5G human ard vcbErinarp- pharmaceuticals or thdr byproducts — like the actlyc Ingredients
         In mcdclnci tor pah, Intectlnn.. high crvDlcstcrol, arthma. cplcpsy, n~icntal Illness end heart problcrrc
              beer, detected In PhlladeJpNa?£ drlnMng natcr. Starting their Mrirdha -(ourncY In mcdsclnc

-------
                       Recent  History
                Major water sources positive for Pharmaceuticals
               A1 hfisf rnp ptarmKVirilicDl •««. d?Becl.wi rt
                  ol insert! dfrirtong wife* tt*p*es tar
               mfllrqpc4*Mi drams. dcc^-rditg to en
                       al

               Pharmaceutlcal-i In drinking water
... : •. •   -i - AH =i ..-••-. ., •  i- -I Iv I
bun n*9*lr** but (ha AP
                    Is^Std pcairr? m p-lunraceulEata  • V¥ala teakU r«geftifC l:r ph-mrtctulc-sl;
                ',•",',• ;• r-M !??Kil!:»'jhairrvk^titi.1:;^.     Tf A1

S.F.'s tap water best in tests, chemists say
Jura hJv, OrinicJfi Enrironrvini Wtuir
            11. 2DDE


             tested driDkiog v.-atei from 10 utilities natioan,idfi said the\r did not detect am^

             a: ill at San Fcandseo's tap. despite HBWE report :o the
' Wfe didn t de^&z: ioythk..z '^Jutsce'.-ei.' said SiLine Sorter, researcia nanag€i a: lie SouthEni
Xe%-a,da TA^tei Authcril^ who helped coordinate a study "br iae research, aro of the Da^Da s ^Ti
utilhies.

              * ki VI«nflMft.EfflnNHm
              ir.Gnuu-^dM'axiul niwi
              ••C-*-r-rvmwwv*irr tt-iM ^mxnrritovv,      HU .Maa^."**** RXMM fi** Uw«Eueh QJ';LaiJj^Ut
                              • -,...-.-•.     ItaiiJi:. T«rfi; IWii/O-dbVii. HPM hb* 2qy
                                     trf mi nh< Pina ifj«Klu« ffm*mm ef

-------
JOSEPH) .':REHV
THOMAS P CWEft
           '.'1RVAM1
      •.IflifPMOTT
WUi. :.i a''" W.W4SOTH
SwiLQOfJ W«l1Waj5E. PHCDE ISiAND
JGHM ft, 'AMMO Vl
GEORGE'iUaiMWiCM. CUB
JtWNWV SA'  ',  ' .nOiA
   . iTTT^- LOLiGLWJA
        .AY^'
                                                  United  States
                              ' ''.'IMl '' ' 1
                  R, sr/vf DWECTOH
        ANDRt W WHEELER. JWWWTY 5W F ftlKCrDfl
                         COMMIHEE ON ENyiRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
                                    WASHINGTON, DC 20510-6175
                                                  il, 2008
    Shane Snyder,
    R&D Project Manager
    Applied Research and Development Center
    Southern Nevada Water Authority
    1350 Richard Bunker Ave.
    Henderson. Nevada 8901:

    Dear Dr Snyder:

    On behalf of the Senale Committee on Environment and Public Works, we invite you lo testily before the
    Subcommittee on Transportation Safety, Infrastructure Security, and Water Quality at a hearing entitled,
    "Pharmaceuticals in the Nation's Water: Assessing Potential Risks and Actions to Address the Issue1' on
    Tuesday, April 15.2008, beginning at 3:00 p.m. in Room 406 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building,

    In order to maximize the opportunity to discuss this matter with you, we ask that your oral testimony be limited

-------
"Contrary to recent media reports that characterize
Pharmaceuticals in water as an entirely new issue,
Pharmaceuticals were first reported in US waters by the
EPA in 1975"
                                                CHAPTER 30

             CC/MS ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                              IN DOMESTIC WASTEWATERS
A. W. Garrison, J. D, Pope and F, R, Allen

     U,S. Environ mental Protection Agency
     Southeast Environmental Research Laboratory
     Athens, Georgia
INTRODUCTION

   \n 1971 this laboratory began a program lo identify extractable> vola-
tile organic compounds in domestic waste waters.  Objectives were to
develop analytical techniques for such analyses, to identify compounds
               intrv snrfflf!R waters after fieCondarv or advanced treat-

-------
                                     .1t Continued
                                      Concentration ijt Wasttwj'.er.
                                        (•*• = Prejffnt, not quantified)
                                                         Physicd-
                                                                         Liwe-
Compound by CJass
                                          Effluent
                         8/73  12/73     fl/72  12/73
                                                                     Raw
                      Btfore
                      Chiori-  Cbiori-
               li/73  nation  nation
lrl ,2,2 Tetrach lows tfiane
1 .1 , i,2Tet wch toroet Jiane

Steroid?
CholtUero-l
Coptosianof
Dru^s ajnj Drug Metabolites
Caffeine                 *
  ifitthyfpropionlc ackf9
  [Cloflbiite
Nicotine
Saficyik flcida
                               0,8
2,0
V
0.1

-------
"The fact that more
Pharmaceuticals are detected
today is not due to greater
contamination of our nation's

-------
"Decades ago, we could only detect contaminants at parts per
million levels. Years ago, we advanced to parts per billion. We
are now able to detect compounds at the parts-per-trillion level,
and are breaching the parts-per-quadrillion boundary..."
  300



  250

to
75 200
o
1
n
3
Q_
3
  15°
   50
           Pharmaceuticals in Water

           Estrogen and Water

           Endocrine Disrupting
           Compounds
f  f
t-«  cy
I  I

-------
    Awwa
    Research
   , Foundation
Advancing the Science of Water*
State of Knowledge
of Endocrine Disruptors
and Pharmaceuticals
in Drinking Water
State of Knowledge
of Endocrine  Disruptors
and Pharmaceuticals
in  Drinking Water
Prepared by:
Shane A, Snyder and Brett J. Vandarf ord
Southern Nevada WalerAuthority
Henderson. NV &9Q15
J6rg Drewes and Eric Dickensoo
Calorado School of Mines, ErfoiTQflmerrtal Science and Engineering Division
Gotten. CO SOW
and
Erin M, Snyder" Gretchen M. Bruce", *nrf Richard C Plena'
"Inlertox, Inc . Seattle, VW9S121
1 BlftCk £ Vealcti Coq}., Kans^ Qty, MO 64114
Subject Area:
High-Quality V\feter
Sponsored by:
        r Foundation
      Quncy Avanue Denver. CO SD235-3Q9S
                                        Published by:
                                                                  by:
                                              Awwa
                                              RHSBarth
                                              Fojndation
                    *\\.
                     Ararlun Wtier Wwti

-------
 "The fact is, the cities that participated in our study by
 submitting water samples for our analysis did so in the
 absence of any regulatory requirement, going well above
 and beyond the regulations in the interest of furthering
 understanding of this issue."
Cities rarely release water test results
           PTPH
      .?- providers flr-i ^-ismacs-xcals In zlrnKrg h\-='Mr1 Ihey •arty:?!
                                    u:-Jily

-------
"Our decision as humans to improve and extend our lives by
using Pharmaceuticals dictates that some infinitely small
amount of these products can and will make their way into
the environment."
Raw Intake for 19 Drinking Water Facilities (>50% Freq.)
Compound
Sulfamethoxazole
Meprobamate
Atrazine
Carbamazepine
Estrone
Dilantin
Atenolol
Gemfibrozil
Naproxen
Trimethoprim
TCEP
Max (ng/L)
110
73
870
51
0.94
29
36
24
32
11
530
Median (ng/L)
12
8.2
32
4.1
0.33
5.0
2.2
2.2
0.93
0.75
120
Frequency (%)
89
84
79
79
79
74
63
58
58
58
53

-------
   "A more central point about our studies is that the few
   Pharmaceuticals we did detect in US drinking waters
   occurred at unfathomably low concentrations."
Finished Water for 18 Drinking Water Treatment Facilities
Compound
Atrazine*
Meprobamate
Dilantin
Atenolol
Carbamazepine
Gemfibrozil
TCEP
DEBT
Metolachlor
TCPP (Fyrol PCF)
Sulfamethoxazole
Max (ng/L)
870
42
19
18
18
2.1
470
93
27
510
3.0
Median (ng/L)
49
5.7
6.2
1.2
6.0
0.48
120
63
16
210
0.39
Frequency (%)
83
78
56
44
44
39
39
33
33
28
22
"Atrazine regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act with an MCL of 3000 ng/L

-------
"If our study had been constrained by the ability to find
these compounds at parts-per-billion levels instead of
delving into the parts-per-trillion range, none of them—not
a single one—would have been found."

    Finished Water for 18 Drinking Water Treatment Facilities
       Compound
Max (ng/L)   Median (ng/L)    Frequency (%)
                       MRL> 1000 ng/L
                       MRL > 50 ng/L
                       MRL > 20 ng/L
                       MRL > 20 ng/L
                       MRL > 20 ng/L
                       MRL > 10 ng/L
                       MRL > 500 ng/L
                       MRL > 100 ng/L
                       MRL > 50 ng/L
                       MRL > 1000 ng/L
                       MRL > 10 ng/L

-------
"The truth is that the concentrations of Pharmaceuticals
found in water supplies are millions of times lower than a
medical dose. Consider that the highest concentration of
any pharmaceutical we detected in US drinking waters is
approximately 5,000,000 times lower than the therapeutic
dose."

-------
"This concentration is roughly equivalent
to 1/2 of an inch in the distance between the
earth and the moon..."

      ^\,-ȣ
      r^

-------
"...or in terms of time, this concentration would be
equivalent to approximately one second in approximately
750 years."

-------
"I can tell you that the bottom-line conclusion is that the
concentrations of Pharmaceuticals we studied are orders of
magnitude lower than would pose a public health threat."
Pharmaceutical DWELs with max. drinking water concentrations
Drug
Risperidone
Phenytoin
Carbamazepine
Fluoxetine
Norfluoxetine
Diazepam
Gemfibrozil
Atenolol
Meprobamate
Triclosan
Sulfamethoxazole
Class
Antipsychotic
Anticonvulsant
Anticonvulsant
SSRI
antidepressant
Metabolite
Benzodiazepine
tranquilizer
Antilipidemic
Beta-blocker
Antianxiety agent
Antibacterial
Anti-infective
DWEL
(ug/L)
0.49
6.8
12
34
34
35
45
70
260
2,600
18,000
Max.
cone.
(ug/L)
0.0029
0.032
0.018
0.00082
0.00077
0.00033
0.0021
0.026
0.043
0.0012
0.003
Margin of
safety
170
210
670
41,000
44,000
110,000
21,000
2,700
6,000
2,200,000
6,000,000
No. of 8-oz
glasses to
exceed DWEL
1,400
1,800
5,600
350,000
370,000
900,000
180,000
23,000
51,000
18,000,000
51,000,000

-------
"Based upon our four-year study of the health relevance
of trace Pharmaceuticals... one could safely consume
more than 50,000 eight-ounce glasses of this water per
day without any health effects."

-------
 "The fact that we can detect trace contaminants does not
 alone imply risk."

          WHO - Drinking Water Quality Guidelines
 8,2.9 Mixtures
 Chemical contaminants of drinking-water supplies are present with numerous other
 inorganic and/or organic constituents. The guideline values are calculated separately
 for individual substances, without specific consideration of the potential for interac-
 tion  of each substance with other compounds present. The large margin of uncer-
 tainty incorporated in the majority of the guideline values is considered to be
 sufficient to account tor potential interactions. In addition, the majority ot contami-
 nants will not be continuously present at concentrations at or near their guideline
 value,
           Schwab et al. 2005 - Reg. Tox. & Pharm.
   "Two  intrinsic  characteristics of most Pharmaceuticals
explain  why  exposures to  hLImtins are  below  the  pre-
dicted no effect  concentrations.  First, safe  exposure lev-
els for APIs  are normally directly related  to therapeutic
i.l ose.  SeconxU because many APIs or  their  metabolites
me  Lome  compounds. bio
-------
   "...the Safe Drinking Water Act already has established
   processes for identifying and regulating drinking water
   contaminants to protect human health."

Federal Register/ Vol. 73, No.  35 /Thursday, February 21, 2008 /Notices
                               A . Ph arm aceu ticals
                                 The Agency evaluated data sources to
                               identify phamiaceu ticals and personal
                               care products that have the potential to
                               occur in PWSs, The primary source of
                               health effects information on
                               phannaceu ticals in the universe was the
                               Food and Drug Administration Database
                               on Maximum Recommended Daily
                               Doses [MRDD), This database includes
                               the recommended adult doses for over
                               1,200 pharmaceutical agents.
STEP 1

Universe


STEP 2
Screening
to— D/"^r*i
a POUL


STEPS
Selecting the
CCL
[

1 1 fniverse »




1 PCCL h-



Evaluation ^_
Expert Review
i '
Proposed CCL


~ I
1
	 	 ., „. ,„,„»_„, ,„, , .,..,, ,,„,,,
I
r* 'it
bur/eillance
And
Nomination

1
1
•—""— 	 f-«--..-—
I




      occurrence parameters, Nitroglycerin is
      the only ph arm aceut leal that is Included
      on the draft CCL 3. EPA is aware of
      concerns regarding the  potential
      presence of pharmaceutical^ in water

-------
"I would caution against regulating Pharmaceuticals any
differently than the scores of contaminants currently
covered by the Safe  Drinking Water Act, because in reality
they are no different."
   Contaminant
     Toluene
  Chlorobenzene
       2,4-D
   Methoxychlor
    Glyphosate
     Benzene
     Simazine
     Atrazine
      Endrin
       PCBs
     Lindane
  Benzo(a)pyrene
 Ethylene Bromide
      Dioxin
MCL (ng/L)
  1000000
  100000
  70000
  40000
   7000
   5000
   4000
   3000
   2000
    500
    200
    200
    50
    0.03
Pharmaceutical   Max. (ng/L)
  Meprobamate
    Dilantin
    Atenolol
 Carbamazepine
Sulfamethoxazole
   Gemfibrozil
  Atorva statin
   Diazepam
   Diclofenac
    Enalapril
   Fluoxetine
   Simvastin
  Trimethoprim
 Ethynylestradiol
 42
 19
 18
 18
 3.0
 2.1
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
<0.50
<0.25
<0.25

-------
   "With regard to removing these compounds...  be certain,
   some technologies are more effective than others."
     Caffeine
    Fluoxetine
 Meprobamate
    Diazepam
      Dilantin
Carbamazepine
                     UV 40 m J     Chlorine 3.5 mg/L    Ozone 2.5 mg/L
                      20
40         60
 % Removal
80
100

-------
"In an age where we are concerned about greenhouse
gas emissions and minimizing our nation's energy
demands, is it wise to dictate energy-intensive water
treatment systems when there is no evidence of public
health benefits?"
  Wounded Waters
     The Hidden Side of
     Power Plant Pollution
                                  THE COMPLETE BRIEFING

-------
.
 anna

-------
                 Drought
  Effect on Pharmaceutical and EDC Concentrations
2> 100
Q.
M—
O

E

c/j
   80 -
   60 -
c
o

"ro

"c
CD
o
c
o
o
O
Q
LJJ

c
CD

75  40 H
o
§
CD
E
CD
   20 -
   o
                              source water concentration

                              Lake Mead Volume
                                              18
                                             - 17
                                             - 15
                                             h 14
                                             - 13
                                              12
                                                 Q)
                                                 ;*•
                                                 (D
                                              16  CD
                                                 0)
                                                 Q.


                                                 O.
                                                 C

                                                 3
                                                 CD
                                                 O
                                                  en
                                                 0)
                                                 q
                                                 CD

-------
"I can tell you with absolute certainty that, if we regulate
contaminants based upon detection rather than health
effects, we are embarking on a futile journey without end."

-------
"The critical question we must address is not 'Do they
exist?,' but rather, 'At what concentration are these
compounds harmful to human health?'"

-------
"...focus on research related to health effects... in order
to determine whether there is in fact a problem to solve. "
Method Reporting Limits based on 100x 
-------
October 20.2006
LAS VEGA
Chemicals cause changes in fish and raise
concerns for humans
Bv Launce Rake 
 *           	^=>—
LasVeeasSun
There's something wrong with the fish,
It's been confounding scientists for years: Male fish are developing female sexual characteristics in Lake
Mead and other freshwater sources around the country.
On Thursday, the U,S, Geological Survey released a four-page summary of more than a decade of
studies linking wastewater chemicals to those changes,

-------

-------
II
                  I
             iijiij
                                          ?


-------
Global Population Growth & Density

 1800: 2% of world lived in cities
 1900: 12% of world lived in cities
 2000: 47% of world lived in cities
 2007: >50% of world lives in cities


 2000: 19 cities >10,000,000 population
 - Only 4 of these were from developed
   nations
    • Tokyo, Osaka, New York, Los Angeles
 The population density per unit of arable
 land will be approximately 10 times
 greater in 2050 than it was in 2000

-------
"It is imperative that the nation do a better job of protecting
its waters, and especially sources of drinking water, from
contamination."

-------
ViP
11  111
it Ms

                      * * *..

" t. t-  w
 V-- - V
        Dr. Shane Snyder
       Applied R&D Center
        Las Vegas, Nevada
       shane.snyder@snwa.com
           (702) 856-3668
         SOUTHERN NEVADA
         WATER AUTHORITY

-------
                   Emerging Contaminants
   (Endocrine Disrupters, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, etc)
     Status of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care
  Products (PPCPs) in River Water and Wastewater
and Evaluation of their Effects on Aquatic Organisms
                     Dr. Yutaka Suzuki
            Team Leader, Water Quality Research Team
               Water Environment Research Group
                Public Works Research Institute

-------
Status of Pharmaceuticals and Personal
 Care Products (PPCPs) in River Water
and Wastewater and Evaluation of their
     Effects on Aquatic Organisms

  Yutaka SUZUKI, Koya KOMORI, Norihide NAKADA
              and Arata HARADA

          Water Quality Research Team
       Water Environment Research Group
         Public Works Research Institute
                          Public Works Research Institute

-------
1. Introduction

 - Growing public concern about the environment
  pollution of Pharmaceuticals and personal care
  products (PPCPs).

 -For assessing the risk of PPCPs on aquatic lives,
  information about environmental fates and
  ecotoxicological data of PPCPs is still limited.

 -In this study, we investigated
  - the occurrence and fate of PPCPs in rivers
  affected by different wastewater loads
  - the biological effects of PPCPs using
  bioassays.

-------
-Based on the results, the river water was
 evaluated from the viewpoint of the effects
 of PPCPs on aquatic lives.

-------
 2. Methods
 2.1 PPCPs in river water and wastewater
 -River with a large basin (16,840 km2)
     Mainstream ¥ Tributary  A Distributary D WWTPs

             V    V     V  V
Upstream
                               Downstream
                   Intake
Distributary
   0
                        Summer survey
                        Winter survey
   250
  190        130
Distance from the River mouth ;km)
       70
receiving a
variety of
wastewaters
from
households,
farmland,
stockbreeders
and
manufactures

-------
- Urban river with a small basin (37 km2)
  Lake Tega
                    Population
                    37,345 peoples
                    Sewage system is
                    well developed
    Ootsu River
0
                St.1
Population
11,841 peoples
On-site treatment
facilities are
mostly used
having some small
tributaries

In downstream
river basin, the
sewage system is
well developed

Upstream river
basin does not yet
have a developed
sewerage system

-------
Target PPCPs
Use
Non-steroadal anti-
inflammatory dmg
Antibiotic
Antiarrhythrnic
Bronchodi later
Vasodilator
Psychoneurot'c agent
Antihyperlipidernic
Anticonvulsant
Antichor^rck scii-nt
Other
Name
acetaminophen, antfpyrine, emenzamide, ibuprofen, indomethacin, mefenamtc
acid, naproxen, diclofenac, fenopiofen, isopropylantipynne, rnepirizole,
cnotamiton, ketopi'ofen
nalfdixic acid, trimethoprim, 2-qumoxafnecarboxyllc acid*', azithromycin,
benzylpenfdllin*, chloramphenlcd*, dailttiromycin, danofloxadn*, levofroxacin,
nojfloxacin*, oxytetracydine*, tetracydine*, thiamphenicol*r tilmicosin*,
suHadimethoxfne*, sutfadimfzfne*, aiffamethoxazole*, sutfamonomethoxine*
atenolol, disopyi'annjde, metop'ofo^, propranolotsotalol
clenbuterol.. salbutamolr terbutaline, theophyllre
diltiaziem, dipyrfdamole, Verapam'l
chlorpromazine, arnitriptyime, imipramfner halopeildol, sulpiride
bezafibrate.r dofibric acid*, gemfibrozil
carbamazepiner primidone
diphenidol, scopcrfamine, toJperfsone
caffeine (stimulants), cyclophosphamide (Imrnunosuppressant),
promethazine (antihistamines), carbazochiome (hemostatics),
dextromethoiphan (antitusslvedrug), ifenprodil (cerebral circulation imp'over),
metocJopramide (dopamine receptor antagonist), tdbutarnide (anti-diabetics),
pentxifVllJne (blood viscosity-deducing agent), prednisotone (cortcosteraid drug)j
N,N-dietiiyt-m-tolarmde (insect-repellent), gn'seofulvfn (antiflingal drug),
furosemide (diuretics), pSrenzepine (peptic ulcer agent)
  *.
  : veterinary dmg; #: rnetabotite

-------
2.2  Ecotoxicity evaluation of PPCPs
•  Bacteria (Microtox®) Bio-liminescent inhibition (EC50)
  Algae
  Algal Growth Inhibition Test
  (EC50, NOEC)
Crustaceans
Acute toxicity test: DaphToxkit
(EC50)
  Amphibians                  •  Protozoa
   Toxicity on development of embryo   Growth inhibition test
  (LC50)                        (EC50)

-------
     11 substances for bioassays
            Anti-inflammatoris
 hUC
     CH
           CQ,H
                      HOOC
                                CH,
     Ibuprofen

    COOH
                             N
                               CH.
 HiC
                         Mefenamic acid
                        COOH
     Fenoprofen
              H CHa
  CH3O
                 coo-
                          Ketoprofen
V
Naproxen
                                                Insect repellent

                                                       O   CHa
                                                  Diethyltoluamide
                                                     ( DEBT )
                                                  Antipruritic
                                                         CH,
                                                         CH,
                                                                  CH
                                                           0
                                                 Crotamiton

-------
               Antibacterial, Antibiotic
                     OH
  Cl
                      Triclosan
                       (TCS)
 CH
     H        *  ^^ ^0
     ,  OH!_O o  f-,,_
     Clarithromycin
V       (CAM )
Azithromycin
  (AZM)
                                 Anticonvulsant
                                  Carbamazepine
                                     (CBZ)
                              Maximum
                              concentration on
                              bioassay
                              = 10mg/L

-------
3,  Results
- PPCP concentration in river with a large basin
       -57 PPCPs were detected in one or more samples
       -Concentration : Effluent > Tributary > Mainstream
 10000
-^000
  100
 U
 C
 O
 U
  0.1
 Winter survey
     &
Summer survey
                            o Wastewater effluent
                            o Tributary
                            • Mainstream  en Under limits of quantification

-------
Source distribution of PPCPs
  -The tributaries were dominant as PPCPs source.
  -Large load of caffeine (easily biodegradable) suggests that
  sewerage systems in the tributaries are insufficient.
               WWTP
      	Surveyed area
      ...  [150 km in length)

           Downstream
           Hi••••••••!••••i•iiimf
    Water flow
               utaries
Mass load
            Sources      W[nter
              Upstream •[—Summer
             Tributaries
              WWTP
              15 1

            1  5"
             LT
               0 J
                 ffl
      S.O-i
                     4.0-
       o-
1.0


0.5H


 0
                         0.25-
0
                               ^  X

                               ? ^


-------
- PPCP concentration in urban small river
       10
   D)
  0.1


 0.01


0.001
                St.1
                 St.2
                         G*
       St.1: without a developed sewerage system
            ^20-1600ng/L
       St.2: the sewerage system is well developed
            =>n.d. - 50ng/L

-------
- Bioassays of PPCPs
               0.001
0.01      0.1       1
   Concentration (mg/L)
          10
                Bacteria
    -Algae
- - A - - Crustaceans
             —— Amphibians —o— Protozoa
 Concentration-response curve of each bioassay on triclosan

-------
Bioassay results

r
Anti-
inflammatory
Insect
repellent
Antipruritic
Anticonvulsant
[
Antibacterial
Antibiotic
^^
[
Ibuprofen
Fenoprofen
Naproxen
Mefenamic acid
Ketoprofen
Diethyltoluamide
Crotamiton
Carbamazepine
Triclosan
Clarithromycin
Bacteria
15min
EC50
% 11.3*
10.4*
18.5*
10.2*
I 20.4*
21.2*
19.6*
28.3*
0.52

N.E.
Algae
96H
EC50
i 	 1
2.3
5.7
3.7
5.4
2.0
4.1
3.5
48.9*
0.012
0.012
Azithromycin JJ N.E. 0.019
NOEC
0.52
2.1
0.52
2.1
1.0
0.52
2.1
0.52
0.0083
0.0052
0.0052
urusta
ceans
48H
EC50
N.E.
N.E.
N.E.
N.E.
2.3
N.E.
N.E.
N.E.
0.26
N.E.
N.E.
Amphibian
96H
_ LC50 _
N.E.
N.E.
N.E.
5.2
N.E.
N.E.
N.E.
N.E.
0.82
N.E.
N.E.
Protozoa
96H
EC50


-
2.4
N.E.
-
-
" I
0.21

^™
 [N.E.]: no effects for setting concentration, [*]: extrapolation value
 [-]: no data, [yellow letter]: additional data
(mg/L)

-------
- First approach for risk evaluation for PPCPs

  •  The predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was
    calculated from the values of NOEC examined by AGI
    test using an assessment factor of 100.
    [PNEC = NOEO100]

  •  The concentration of PPCPs actually measured at each
    observation station as
    Measured Environmental Concentration (MEC).

  •  MEC/PNEC<0.1      ; Acceptable
    0.1<=MEC/PNEC <1    ; Needs further survey
    1<=MEC/PNEC       ; Needs detailed evaluation

-------
Results of First approach for risk evaluation
for PPCPs


^
Ibuprofen
Fenoprofen
Naproxen
Mefenamic acid
Ketoprofen
Diethyltoluamide
Crotamiton
Carbamazepine
Triclosan
Clarithromycin
Azithromycin
PNEC
[NOEC/100]
(H9/L)
5.21
20.83
5.21
20.83
10.41
5.21
20.83
5.21
0.08
0.05
0.05
	
I
MEC
(ng/L)
0.22
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.13
0.03
1.60
0.03
0.36
0.28
0.09
	 1













St.1
vlEC/PNEC
0.042
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.012
0.007
0.077
0.005
4.322
5.378
1.671

Assessment!
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Needs
detailec
evaluatior
Needs
detailec
evaluatior
Needs
detailec
evaluatior

I












MEC
(ng/L)
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
^_













St. 2
MEC/PNEC
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.372
0.653
0.000

Assessment
-(
Acceptable ^
Acceptable I
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable [
Needs
further
survey
Needs
further
survey
Acceptable

-------
4.  Conclusion

  In a river with a large basin, PPCP concentrations were in
  the order of effluents > tributaries > mainstream. Major
  load of PPCPs was estimated to come from the tributaries.
  In the urban small river, concentrations of PPCPs were
  different according to the watershed conditions, higher
  concentration in the watershed with lower sewerage ratio..
  The antibiotics "Clarithromycin and Azithromycin" affected
  the algae but did not affect the other lives.
  Triclosan had affected all lives. The sensitivity of these
  lives to Triclosan was in the order of algae > protozoa >
  crustaceans > bacteria > amphibians.
  Thus the effects of PPCPs varied according to species of
  lives.

-------
Three PPCPs (Triclosan, Clarithromycin and Azithromycin)
posed an eco-toxiclogical risk in this observed rivers.
The eco-toxicological risk in the water basin that does not
yet have a developed sewerage system is higher than that
well developed the sewerage system.

-------
                  Emerging Contaminants
(Endocrine Disrupters, Pharmaceuticals, Personal Care Products, etc)
Emerging Contaminants - State of Science in the
                    United States
                   Dr. Rhodes Truss ell
                       President
                 Trussell Technologies, Inc.

-------
Emerging Contaminants - State of the
          Science in The U.S.A.
              R.  Rhodes Trussell, Ph.D.
                 Trussell Technologies, Inc.
                      Pasadena, CA


                Japan - U.S. Joint Conference
      On Drinking Water Quality Management and Wastewater Control
                   March 2-5, 2009
                                 Trussell
                                 TECHNOLOGIES INC

-------
                 Outline
Historical Perspective
Constituents Currently Emerging
Future Perspective
What Should be Done to Manage Our Risk

-------
Our concern about the unintended
 consequences of chemicals has
          deep roots

-------
• In 1798 Thomas Malthus predicted we were running
out of food (The world population at the time was ~ 950
million)
• In 1969, Paul Erlich predicted we were running out of
resources, including food, and that, by 1985 the world
population would be reduced to a sustainable level of
1.5 billion people (The world population was then 3.6
billion. Today it is 6.7 billion)

-------
We have overcome these predictions
through the application of technology

•  Yet many worry about the unintended
  consequences of that technology
•  The more powerful the technology, the
  greater are the unintended consequences
  implied
•  Chemistry has been at the heart of our
  technological advance
•  So it is probably appropriate that the focus
  has been on the unintended consequences of
  those chemicals

-------
Our chemical revolution began, in
earnest, between 1920 and 1950

-------
    Modern living through chemistry
Alkylbenzene Sulfonate
    Polystyrene
    Penicillin
       1920      1930
Erythromycin
       DDT
   1940
                                       1
                                    950
            I
TNT
Bakelite  pCBs
        Nylon
                           I
                    Toxaphene
                        Tetracycline
                         Chlordane
                         Polyurethane

-------
 Truly, these chemicals have
changed our standard of living

-------
     Concerns about unintended
consequences, to public health, and to
 the environment, began in the 1950s

-------
          Early work

In the late 1950s, the USPHS did
extensive work trying to find a way to
assess the level  of hydrocarbon
pesticides in drinking water sources
They developed  a gravimetric method
the Carbon chloroform extract (CCE)
Gordon Robeck, Keith Carswell & Jim
Symons

-------
 1962 was a big year
1970    1980    1990     2000

-------
 1962  was a big year
1970
1980
1990
2000
   The USPHS issued 1962 drinking water
   standards which recommended
   the carbon chloroform extract (CCE) at ^ 0.2
   mg/L

-------
1962 was a big year
1970
Bf!9 ^B^^l
1980
I
1990
I
2000
I

-------
 1962 was a big year
1970
1980
1990
2000
    Ms. Carson wrote about the dangers
    of pesticides like dieldrin, toxaphene,
    heptachlor and DDT

-------
 1962 was a big year
1970
1980
1990
2000
    The book was very controversial

    President Kennedy had a Science
    Advisory Committee review the issue
   The Committee supported Carson

-------
 1962 was a big  year
1970
1980
1990
2000
            I
            I
             I
     "Sometimes, technological progress is so
     fundamentally at odds with natural processes that it
     must be curtailed" - R Carson

-------
1962  was a  big year
1970
^^^^B '
1980
I
1990
I
2000
I
    And so began the struggle between:


    -people concerned about the unintended consequences of
    new technologies ... and

    -people seeking a higher standard of living through
    technical innovation


    That struggle now begins its 47th year

-------
So emerging constitutents is not a
           new issue

-------
 Emerging constituents is not a
              new issue
  47 year history:
 	1970	1980	1990	2000
        1  1974  '         '         '
National Organics Reconnaissance Survey (NORS) -
continuing to look for organics in drinking water - but with
GC/MS

-------
 Emerging constituents is not a
             new issue
  47 year history:
 	1970	1980	1990	2000
       '  1974  '        '        '
NORS
SDWA - protect our drinking water from man-
made chemicals

-------
  Emerging  constituents is not a
              new issue
   47 year history:
  	1970	1980	1990	2000

         1 1974   '
NORS

SDWA

Discovery of THMs - (U.S. & Holland)
  SOC's created during chlorination of drinking water

-------
 Emerging constituents is not a
             new issue
    • 47 year history:
    • The Disinfection By-Products Story
      1970
      1980
        1990
 2000
1974
Discover
THMs
1982
THM
Rule
 1998   2001
DBP Rule  NDMA
 Stage I
 2006
DBP Rule
 Stage II

-------
   Emerging constituents is not a
                 new  issue
       •  47 year history:
       •  1977 - Manufactured chemicals: start
         showing up where they aren't supposed to be
         1970     1980      1990      2000
                   1980
                   CERCLA
   1976
NRDC Consen
   Decree
65 "class.
1977
DBCP
Amendments 129
Priority Pollutants
   NPDES
                  «f^
                 Lai€
                   VOC's
                 Everywhere
                                    2001
                                   Stockholm
                                   Convention
                                   Dirty dozen
            1997
          Perchlorate
Superfund

-------
    Emerging  constituents is not a
                 new issue
       • 47 year history:
       • Manufactured chemicals: new implications?
1995
_ "
2000
1
2005
I
           Colburn et al., Endocrine Distrupters
1996          new moc'e' f°r *ne ecologic impact of
           chemicals
:

••••

FOTILin,

-------
Emerging constituents is not a
             new issue
   • 47 year history:
   • Manufactured chemicals: new implications?
   1995	2000	2005
    I             I               I

       Research has shown Pharmaceuticals
       -In the environment
       -In our water supplies
       -In our drinking water

-------
Emerging constituents is not a
             new issue
   • 47 year history:
   • Manufactured chemicals: new implications?
   1995	2000	2005
     I             I                I

        As in Rachel Carson's day, this seems to be
        less an issue for our drinking water supplies
        and more an issue for the ecological
        environment that supports us

-------
Emerging constituents is not a
             new issue
   • 47 year history:
   • Manufactured chemicals: new implications?
   1995	2000	2005
     I             I                I

        As in Rachel Carson's day, this seems to be
        less an issue for our drinking water supplies
        and  more an issue for the ecological
        environment that supports us

        But the public is not sanguine

-------
A quick look at today's list

-------
Some Classes of Today's Emerging
      Constituents of Concern
           Herbicides (Atrazine, Metolachlor)

           Person care products (DEBT,
           Triclosan)

           Household chemicals (Caffiene,
           detergents)

           Industrial chemicals (EDTA,
           Bisphenol a)

-------
Some Classes of Today's Emerging
  Constituents of Concern (cont'd)
            Pharmacueticals
             - Metabolic regulators (Diclofenac, Gemfibrozil)
             - Hormone substitutes (EE2)
             — Antibiotics (Sulfamethoxychlor, Erythromycin)
             — Others (Carbazmazepine, lopromide)
            Microbes (parasites, adenovirus, norovirus)DD
            Nanoparticles

-------
 List  of 100  Compounds  Often  Found
   in  U.S.   Effluents  &  Surface  Waters
1,4-dichlorobenzene, 1,7-dimethylxanthine,
    17a-ethinylestradiol, 17p-estradiol, 2,6-di-
    f-butyl 1.4-benzoquinone, 2,6-di-f-butyl
    phenol, 3-f-butyl-4-hydroxy anisole, 4-
    methyl phenol, 5-methyl-1 H-benzotriazole
Acetominophen, Amoxicillin,
    Androstenedione, Atenolol, Atrazine,
    Azithromycin, Benzo(a)pyrene,
    Bezafibrate, Bisphenol-A, Brominated
    Diphenyl Ether (BDPE), Butylated
    hydroxyanisole (BHA), Butylated
    hydroxytoluene (BHT), Caffiene,
    Carbamazepine, Chloropyrifos,
    Chlorotetracycline, cholesterol,
    Ciprofloxacin, Clarithromycin, Clofobric
    acid, Coprostanol, Cotinine,
DDT, Dehydronifedipine, diatrozate,
    Diazenon, Diazepam, Di-N-
    butylphthalate, Diclofenac, Dilantin,
    Diphenhydrmine, Enroflaxicin,
    erythromycin, Estriol, Estrone, Ethanol, 2-
    butoxy-phosphate, Ethinyl Estradiol
Ethylenediamine tetra acetic aid (EDTA),
   Fluoranthene, Fluoxetine, Galaxolide,
   Gemfibrozil, Hydrocone, Ibuprofen,
   Indometacine, lopromide, Ketrprofen,
   Lincomycin, Lipitor, Meprobamate,
   Metolachlor,Methadone, Metro pro lol,
   Monesin, Morphine, Musk Ketone,
Naphthalene,  Naproxen, N-N-
   diethyltoluamide (DEET), Nitrilotriacetate
   (NTA), Nonylphenol, Nonylphenol poly
   ethoxylate, Norfloxacin, NDMA,
   Octylphenol, Octylphenol Poly ethoxylate,
   Ofloxacin, Oxybenzene,
Pentoxifyline, Phenytoin, Phthalic anhydride,
   Phenacetine, Polybrominated diphenyl
   ethers (PBDE), Predisone, Primadone,
   Progesterone, Propranolol, Pyrene
Roxithromycin, Salicycllic acid,
   Sulfadimethoxine, Sulfamethazine,
   Sulfathomethoxazole, Sulfathiozole,
   TCEP, TCPP, Testosterone, Tonalide,
   Triclosan, Trimethoprim & Virginiamycin

-------
Of the 100, there are 31 compounds we see or expect
   to see with some regularity in raw drinking water
   Acetominophen, Atenolol,
     Atrazine, Azithromycin,
     Bisphenol-A, Caffiene,
     Carbamazepine,
     Ciprofloxacin,
     Erythromycin, Estrone
     Ethylenediamine tetra
     acetic aid (EDTA),
     Galaxolide, Gemfibrozil,
     Ibuprofen, lopromide,
     Meprobamate,
     Naproxen
N-N-diethyltoluamide
  (DEET), nonylphenol,
  nonylphenol
  polyethoxylate,
  Phenytoin, Octylphenol,
  Octylphenol
  polyethoxylate,
  Primidone,
  Sulfamethoxazole,
  TCEP, Triclosan, &
  Trimethoprim

-------
  Of these 31, the 11 highlighted in blue were
     those most frequently found in recent
    WRF/SNWA surveys of U.S.tap waters
Acetominophen, Atenolol,
  Atrazine, Azithromycin,
  Bisphenol-A, Caffiene,
  Carbamazepine,
  Ciprofloxacin,
  Erythromycin, Estrone
  Ethylenediamine tetra
  acetic aid (EDTA),
  Galaxolide, Gemfibrozil,
  Ibuprofen, lopromide,
  Meprobamate,
  Naproxen
N-N-diethyltoluamide
  (DEET), nonylphenol,
  nonylphenol
  polyethoxylate,
  Phenytoin, Octylphenol,
  Octylphenol
  polyethoxylate,
  Primidone,
  Sulfamethoxazole,
  TCEP, Triclosan, &
  Trimethoprim

-------
 Of the 31, there are also 13 compounds that are
particularly persistent (candidates in groundwater)
  Acetominophen, Atenolol,
    Atrazine, Azithromycin,
    Bisphenol-A, Caffiene,
    Carbamazepine,
    Ciprofloxacin,
    Erythromycin, Estrone
    Ethylenediamine tetra
    acetic aid (EDTA),
    Galaxolide, Gemfibrozil,
    Ibuprofen, lopromide,
    Meprobamate,
    Naproxen
N-N-diethyltoluamide
  (DEET), nonylphenol,
  nonylphenol
  polyethoxylate,
  Phenytoin,  Octylphenol,
  Octylphenol
  polyethoxylate,
  Primidone,
  Sulfamethoxazole,
  TCEP, Triclosan, &
  Trimethoprim

-------
So how do we manage this issue?

-------
The Current U.S. Model Follows the
  Advice of the NRC in the 1980s
                Hazard
               Identification
            Dose-
           Response
    Risk
 Management
   (action)
   Risk
Characterization
 Exposure
Assessment

-------
The Current U.S. Model Follows the
  Advice of the NRC in the 1980s
Hazard

Identification



Dose-
Response
AQQpQQmpnt



    Risk
 Management
   (action)
   Risk
Characterization
 Exposure
Assessment
 To use this process we have to get data:
  * Dose-response
  * Occurrence

-------
The Current U.S. Model Follows the
  Advice of the NRC in the 1980s
Hazard

Identification



Dose-
Response
AQQpQQmpnt



    Risk
 Management
   (action)
   Risk
Characterization
 Exposure
Assessment
 Note: Risk management is the last step

-------
But problems have developed  in the

   NRC  Risk Management Process

'  Hard, scientific data are not available (and won't be)
   -  We chose not to directly measure health-effects in humans
      • So we test outcomes in other animals
   -  We cannot observe effects at low doses
      • So we give the animals high doses
   -  And we use cross-species safety factors and multi-stage
     models to understand what the results mean
      • both are logical, neither can be verified
   -  We suspect that impacts resulting from exposure to one
     chemical may be affected by exposure to another
      • but we don't understand these complexities well enough to include
       them in our risk assessments

-------
But problems have developed  in the
   NRC Risk Management Process
             Most of the analytical methods we use to assess
             occurrence are target-specific
              x i.e. we only find what we look for
              H Hence, we don't know what we don't know
             The analytical methods we do have are becoming
             increasingly sensitive
              x Increasingly we know something is present without
               knowing if its presence, at that level, is significant

-------
But problems have developed  in the

  NRC Risk Management Process

       • It is not surprising that disagreements exist
         among members of the scientific community
         about how the data we do have should be
         interpreted
       • Nor is it surprising that people don't agree
         about the significance of the risks identified
       • The problem is even more complex when we
         expand our horizon to consider impacts on the
         entire eco-sysytem

-------
But problems have developed  in the
  NRC Risk Management Process
        Change is coming at an increasingly
        rapid pace
         - Driven by population growth
         - Driven by economic growth
        Potential new problems are out-stripping
        the resources we have to address them

-------
A Plot of the World's Population
  llustrates the Pace of Change
  Source: Wikipedia
         500
1000

Year
1500
2000

-------
But the increase during my lifetime
  has been particularly profound
   Source: Wikipedia
          500
1000

Year
1500
2000

-------
But the increase during my lifetime
  has been particularly profound
   Source: Wikipedia
          500
1000

Year
1500
2000

-------
  But the increase during my lifetime

    has been particularly profound
     Source: Wikipedia
                                   Today
.2 5
-4—'
.03


E. 4
O
I 2



  1
                            194i5-RTborn
            500
                     1000

                     Year
1500
2000

-------
 But the increase during my lifetime

    has been particularly profound
     Source: Wikipedia
                                   Today
.2 5
-4—'
.03


E. 4
O
                             194i5-RTborn
            500
1000
1500
2000
Driven by technological innovation the world

economy has grown faster yet

-------
 As the Scale of Man's Activities Have Increased, The
      Scale of their Impact Has Increased as well
   7


   6
      Source: Wikipedia
Hole in
03 layer
                     Global
                     warming
                            Acid rain
                            LA Smog
 .
O
12
   1
     Oxygen depletion
     in major rivers
            i
Waterborne disease
                 500
           1000
           Year
           1500
2000

-------
  We need a  new  scheme
It is time we (the U.S.) re-examined our
approach
A dialogue about the proper design of
preventative action may be the right place to
start (early moves in risk management)
Possible guidelines for precaution
 - Substance is known to be toxic
 - Evidence of adverse effects is accumulating
 - Substance is not removed by secondary treatment
 - Substance is persistent in the environment
 - Substance accumulates in the food chain

-------
How might this work?

-------
   Elements  of an Appropriate

                Response

1.   Essential tenant: On-going investment is required
    (no illusion that the "problem" will soon be "solved")
2.   Monitor Monitor, Monitor
   -    Develop & maintain lists of compounds
   -    Develop & maintain standard methods of analysis
   -    Conduct regular national surveys
   -    On-going requirements for monitoring by water and wastewater
       utilities and industry (effluents, influents, groundwater, biota)

-------
   Elements of an  Appropriate

                 Response

3.   Cradle to grave management
   -    National program on habits of disposal
   -    On-going research on removal in water and wastewater
       treatment
   -    Upgrade treatment when affordable (both water & wastewater)
4.   Find the Bad Actors and Fix them
   -    Identify compounds that: persist in the environment, accumulate
       in the biota, are resistant to treatment, show evidence of toxicity,
       etc.
   -    Study their toxicity
   -    Find replacements for problem compounds

-------
finis

-------
Distribution System Water
    Quality/Integrity

-------
         Distribution System Water Quality/Integrity
Reduction of Residual Chlorine in the Drinking
            Water in Yokohama City
                 Mr. Shigeo Himmoto
       Manager, Northern Area Construction Division
              Yokohama Waterworks Bureau
                 The City of Yokohama

-------
   YOKOHAMA
   H I N O f N f K C V
Reduction of Residual Chlorine in the

 Drinking Water in Yokohama City
           Shigeo Hiramoto
               &
 Manager, Northern Area Construction Division,

   Waterworks Bureau, The city of Yokohama

-------
Map of Japan
                 TOKYO
                 YOKOHAMA
                          2

-------
View of Central Yokohama
             MtFuji
                Landmark Tower
            Port of Yokohama

-------
Minato Mirai 21  Area

-------
Chinatown
Kaikoukinenkaikan

-------
Topography of YOKOHAMA CITY
   Hill

-------
Overview of The Waterworks Facility

•  Area          435 km2
•  Population   3.65 million
•  Water filtration plant   4
•  Pipelines     9,000km
•  Amount of water supply
             1.2 million m3/ day.

-------
    Schematic Chart of Improvements
                 Required to Obtain
Supply of safe, high-quality
   drinking water
                   Incorporation of advanced filtration
                   technologies (i.e. membrane filtration and
                   advanced water treatment)
                   Removal of chlorine odour by
                   reducing level of chlorine
Direct feed from the the city'sdistribution system instead of
storage tank system
                   Regular inspection of water storage tanks
                   by waterworks personnel
                   Replacement of exisiting lead pipes
                   Instruction on the maintenance of water
                   supply equipment.
                                           8

-------
50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

 5

 n
   Residual Chlorine Concentration
 Average of 6400   Points in Yokohama City
                                    2007
                                    2003
                                    2001
                                    1999
                                    1997
                                    1995
- 0.2- 0.3- 0.4- 0.5- 0.6- 0.7- 0.8- 0.9-
                                           Residual chlorine
                                       1.0-  Concentration
                                             (mg/1)

-------
Efforts for Eliminating The Chlorine Odour
    1)  Improvement of chlorination facilities


    2)  Replacement of aged pipes


    3)  Installation of automatic water quality
       analyzers at consumers' taps
                                          10

-------
Outline  of Residual Chlorine Reduction
    Water Quality Monitoring
    System
Analyzers are installed at water taps for
monitoring residual chlorine levels
                                       Automatic water quality analyzer
                 amtenance section for wa
                           Monthly & daily crata
                           rends graph
FOMA Network
                         Water intake opening
                   auction of residual chlorine
                 at distribution reservoirs
                  Water filtration plant
                                                         Automatic water quality analyzer
                              Distribution reservoir

-------
Installation of Water Quality Analyzers
               Water HiQtrihntinn hlnr.k.Q nf Ynknhama
                  area with water
                  Tsurugamine blo<
                   area for future installation
12

-------
      Water Quality Analyzer
     exterior
interior
Fig. 4 Water quality analyzer
                                     13

-------
  The Locations of Automatic Water

Quality Analyzers were determined by

   Locations allowing the units to homogeneously cover
   the whole testing area.
   Existence of pipe types with a high possibility of
   reducing residual chlorine levels
   The results of the residual chlorine survey conducted
   in summer months.
   The results of residual chlorine simulation using  a
   distribution network analysis
   Areas with low residual chlorine levels confirmed by
   local water supply  maintenance sections
                                             14

-------
Area Selection for Unit Installation
              P res s ure
              distribution
               istributi
G ravity flow
distribution
  Unit No37
reser
           ^   ^   Prnnr>c;p>rl i

-------
Specifications of Pipes Connected
         to Unit No.37
Water service pipes
Pipe type
VLGP
Diameter
20mm
Year installed
1983
Distribution pipes
Pipe type
DP
Diameter
150mm
Yeat installed
1977
                               16

-------
     Residual Chlorine Value Chart
Residual chlorine
concentration
(mg/l)
1.4
Residual chlorine at reservoir
' Residual chlorine measured
by unit No 37
      Unit No. 37
Data for 017 017 08 - 297 027 08
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
                 214 Reduce chlorine
                   residual level

-------
Decrease in Residual Chlorine Concentration
No32 ~ No40

Average value of
9 units
0 66
\j .\j\j
(mg/l)
Reduction of residual chlorine
concentration
[February 4, 2008]

U 0.08mg/l)
No32 ~ No40

Average value of
9 units
0 S8
\J .~J O
Cms/0
                                     18

-------
    Monitoring  Display for Unit No.37
          2008/08/05 07:52:00-2008/09/05 13:52:00
                                      Period of 1 Month: 057 087 08 ~ 057 09
 100
  70
  60
  50
  40
  20
  10
     wat pr t pmpprat i irp
                                                                 (iu/1)
                                                                 2.00
low temperatures in

late August	
                                      .--.._.'-	-.-'•--	-    ' -
                                                                 i.eo




                                                                 1.40




                                                                 1.20
                                                                 o.eo




                                                                 0.40




                                                                 0.20
        08/08 10:62 08/11 13:52 08/14 16:52 08/17 13:52 08/20 22:52 08/24 01:52 08/27 04:52 08/30 07:52  09/02 10:52

    2008/08/05   |4|                                             Ml 2008/09/05

    07:62:00  _I_U	LU	I_1J  13:52:00
ro
:, '"lit:    M1A2006

                                            <•
                                            ••
                                TIWOGB

-------
          Challenges Lying Ahead

The issues and tasks to be undertaken in furtherance
  to the project:

• Improved and reliable performance of water
  quality analyzers
• Surveys on the water in storage tanks atop or
  inside buildings  as well as the provision of
  guidance on their proper maintenance.
                                           20

-------
  Thank You for Your Attention
                     Character of
                Yokohama water works Bureau
                       Hamapyon
21                        .-SSL      21

-------
         Distribution System Water Quality/Integrity
Overview of Distribution System Water Quality
         Issues and Research Activities
                  Mr. Chris Rayburn
             Director, Research Management
               Water Research Foundation
                  (formerly AwwaRF)

-------
Overview of Distribution System
      Vater Quality Issues and
        Research Activities
   Japan-U.S. Joint Conference on Drinking Water
    Quality Management and Wastewater Control
               March 2, 2009
             Las Vegas, Nevada
                                         E R
                                  RESEARCH
                                   -
  © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied, reproduced or otherwise utilized without permission.

-------
  Presentation Overview
Why is DSWQ important?
What are DSWQ issues?
Water Research Foundation:
Results and Ongoing Activities
Closing Thoughts
                            WATER
                            RESEARCH
                             F n . j i. n ,•>
         © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Why is DSWQ Important?
Public health implications
Key benchmark of customer
satisfaction
Regulatory attention
Aging infrastructure
Aging population—increasingly
immunocompromised
                             WATER
                             RESEARCH
                             F n . j i. n ,•>
         © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
M
elOO
 £= 80
 £ f 70
 gX 60
 2 5 50
 DO 40
 oi tj 30
l-ga 20
 t Q
    0
                                       Number of outbreaks in CWS
                                        % due to distribution system
                                   Years
     Waterborne disease outbreaks in community water systems
          associated with distribution system deficiencies

SOURCE: National Research Council, "Public Water Supply Distribution
Systems: Assessing and Reducing Risks" (2005)                  —-
                                                               WATER
                                                               RESEARCH
                     © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
DSWQ  Issues and Vulnerabilities
  Hiah Priorit
   Cross connection and backflow
   Contamination during main installation, repair
   or rehabilitation
   Storage facility operation and maintenance
   Premise plumbing water quality
   Distribution system operation / operator
   training
   Source: National Research Council, "Public Water Supply Distribution
   Systems: Assessing and Reducing Risks" (2005)
                                            WATER
                                            RESEARCH
                                            F n . j ». n .1
                © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
DSWQ  Issues and Vulnerabilities
  Medium Priorit
    Biofilm and microbial regrowth
    Loss of disinfectant residual
    Pressure transients and pathogen intrusion
    Source: National Research Council, "Public Water Supply Distribution
    Systems: Assessing and Reducing Risks" (2005)
                                            WATER
                                            RESEARCH
                                             F n . j i. n ,•>
                © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
DSWQ  Issues and Vulnerabilities
  Lower Priorit
    Effects of water age (e.g. DBF formation,
    increased corrosion)
    Nitrification
    Permeation
    Leaching
    Post-sedimentation
    Source: National Research Council, "Public Water Supply Distribution
    Systems: Assessing and Reducing Risks" (2005)
                                            WATER
                                            RESEARCH
                                            F n .j ». n ,•> r i o w
                © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
  Water Research Foundation
     Involvement in DSWQ

• Pioneer in U.S. DSWQ research

• >130 related projects dating to
 mid-1980s

• Completed research in all risk /
 vulnerability areas identified in
 2005 NRC study
                               WATER
                               RESEARCH
                               F n .j ». n ,•> r i o w
          © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Pressure Transients and Pathogen Intrusion

  • Contaminant intrusion into mains due to sudden,
    temporary drop in water pressure

  • Issue little recognized prior to Foundation
    research

  • Key projects illustrate typical research response
    to new issue
      - Proof of concept (is problem real, and what causes it?)
      - Assess magnitude (how big is the problem?)
      - Develop control and management techniques (how do
       we address the problem?)
                                               WATER
                                               RESEARCH
                 © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------



                   A bad  day at the  office.
Source:  AWWA, "Opflow" (1999)
WATER
RESEARCH
                                                                        F n . j i. n ,•>
                     © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Pressure Transients and Pathogen Intrusion

Project 2686: Verification and Control of Pressure
Transients and Intrusion in Distribution Systems (2004)

   • Pressure monitoring of seven full-scale
    distribution systems

   • Pilot testing to measure intrusion volume
I    under various conditions

   • Evaluation of full-scale hydraulic surge
    models
                                             WATER
                                             RESEARCH
                                             F n . j i. n ,•>
                © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation  Research Highlights:
Pressure Transients and Pathogen Intrusion

Project 2686: Verification and Control of Pressure
Transients and Intrusion in Distribution Systems (2004)

   • Verified that pressure transients (including negative
    pressure events) occur in full-scale systems during
    surge events

   • Showed that surge events are most commonly
    associated with sudden shutdown of pumps

   • Successfully measured intrusion volumes at pilot
    scale

   > Verified surge models as useful tools for evaluating
    effectiveness of surge control devices (e.g. surge
    tanks, vacuum valves)
                                                 WATER
                                                 RESEARCH
                  © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
                 Negative for ~24 sec.

                 As low as -4.4 psi


  n "x ,••
                n
                  • .••'•
                                -mr m
                                                             i  •
           Distribution system pressure following a pump
                         station power outage
Source: Water Research Foundation 91101F, "Verification and Control of
Pressure Transients and Intrusion in Distribution Systems" (2004)
                                                                          WATER
                                                                          RESEARCH
                       © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
                                                                          F n .1 ». n ••

-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Pressure Transients and Pathogen Intrusion
Project 3008: Susceptibility of Distribution Systems to
Negative Pressure Transients (2006)
   • Developed surge models for sixteen full-scale
    distribution systems
   • Three key simulations for each model:
      - Complete loss of pumping (e.g. power outage)
      - Main break in a key trunk line
      - Opening a hydrant to fire flow
                                             WATER
                                             RESEARCH
                                              F n . j i. n ,•>
                 © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Pressure Transients and Pathogen Intrusion

Project 3008: Susceptibility of Distribution Systems to
Negative Pressure Transients (2006)

  • Identified and evaluated characteristics that
I    make distribution systems more susceptible
    to  pressure transients

  I* Showed that floating storage facilities help
    reduce pressure transient magnitude and
    severity

    Developed utility guidance on conducting
    pressure monitoring and developing surge
    models
                                            WATER
                                            RESEARCH
                © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Pressure Transients and Pathogen Intrusion

Project 4152:  Managing Distribution System Pressures to
Protect Water Quality (Ongoing)

   • Began early 2008

   • Objectives

      - Further assess distribution system pathogen
       intrusion risk factors

      - Quantify the relationship between pressure
       transients and DSWQ (e.g. pathogen
       concentration, disinfectant residual)

      - Develop best practices for protecting DSWQ
       through pressure management
                                                WATER
                                                RESEARCH
                 © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Online Monitoring and Early Warning Systems
    • Primary challenges
       - Low contaminant concentrations
       - False positives
      Research focus areas
       - Optimizing existing sensors (pH, Cl, particle counting,
         etc.)—reliability, placement, O&M
       - Developing new sensor technologies
       - Data capture, processing, analysis
      Surge of interest after 9/11 although applications
      go well beyond security
                                                  WATER
                                                  RESEARCH
                   © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Online Monitoring and Early Warning Systems

 Project 3035: Data Processing and Analysis for Online
 Distribution System Monitoring (2008 - partnership with CSIRO)

    • Rigorous, systematic approach for identifying
     and distinguishing DSWQ anomalies from
     background noise—establishing background
     conditions and variability is key

    • Developed unique method for fingerprinting
     and tracking movement of water "parcels"

     Demonstrated in three full-scale systems
                                             WATER
                                             RESEARCH
                 © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
                                        "
 /  ' f f
/>'/••'-
'-'-'.-' • -'
              Is*
              I K
              I!
                ;-
                                   M
        Diurnal variation in pH, ORP and T at City West Water

                         Melbourne, Victoria AU
Source: Water Research Foundation 91226, "Data Processing and Analysis

for On-Line Distribution System Monitoring" (2008)
                       © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
                                                                         WATER
                                                                         RESEARCH


-------
Foundation Research Highlights:
Online Monitoring and Early Warning Systems

Project 3086: Distribution System Security and Water Quality
Improvement Through Data Mining (2008 - TC with Charleston SC)

  I* Innovative computer algorithms for defining background
    and measuring anomalies from conventional sensor data
    (pH, conductivity, Cl, TOC)—again, knowing baseline is
    key

    Detected onset of nitrification event in full-scale system

  • Valuable lessons-learned on sensor placement (readings
    affected by pressure transients)

    Follow-on project 4182 will further develop algorithms and
    data processing/analysis methodology
                                                  WATER
                                                  RESEARCH
                   © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
 Ongoing Foundation Activities

DSWQ Strategic Initiative
 Began in 2007
• Three key objectives
   - Premise plumbing water quality
   - Multiple barrier approach to DSWQ
   - Chloramine knowledge gaps
• Multiple year, multiple project commitment
• Eight ongoing projects
                                        WATER
                                        RESEARCH
                                        F n . j i. n ,•>
             © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
 Ongoing Foundation Activities

Research and Information Collection
Partnership

• Collaboration between Foundation and EPA

• Underway early 2009

• Seven key focus areas aligned with NRC
 Report priority issues

• Developing analytical frameworks for each
 focus area—consistent approach for
 identifying and prioritizing research needs
                                      WATER
                                      RESEARCH
                                      F n . j i. n ,•>
            © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------

        Closing Thoughts

DSWQ is not an emerging issue; it's an old
issue receiving fresh attention for a variety of
reasons

Need for greater infrastructure RRR in
coming years presents an opportunity to "do
it right" and help optimize DSWQ

Connection between DSWQ and public health
is still poorly understood
                                       WATER
                                       RESEARCH
                                       F n . j i. n ,•>
            © 2009 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

-------
           Thank You!
Chris Rayburn
Director, Research Management
Water Research Foundation
(303) 347-618f
crayburn@wata|^^^^^^ndation,org

-------
                   Day 2
               Proceedings of
     JAPAN - UNITED STATES JOINT
   CONFERENCE ON DRINKING WATER
      QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND
        WASTEWATER CONTROL
                March 2009
Sponsored by:
3-EPA
             WATE
              FOUNDATION	
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
             XWERF
             Water Environment Research Foundation
             Collaboration. Innovation. Results.
    WATER
    RESEARCH
    FOUNDATION"
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE: OF WATER*

-------
Sustainability of Water Supply Systems,
      Wastewater Systems, and
Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments

-------
Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
           Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
      Performance Assessment of Aging
         Drinking Water Infrastructure
                 Mr. Yasuhiro Suzuki
                     Counselor
             Japan Water Research Center

-------
5th Japan-U.S. Governmental Conference on Drinking Water Quality Management

             and Wastewater Control
   Performance Assessment
    of Aging Drinking Water
          Infrastructure
      Yasuhiro Suzuki, Counselor
    Japan Water Research Center

          March 2-5, 2009, Las Vegas, NV

-------
       Today's Topics

Rapidly aging drinking water
infrastructure in Japan

Stagnation of infrastructure renewal
and future needs

Performance assessment and
improvement strategies

Brief outline of performance
assessment methods

-------
Much of the Drinking Water Infrastructure
   was Implemented in the 1960s & '70s
    1 ,800,000


    1 ,600,000


  f 1,400,000
  >*

  g 1,200,000


  [§, 1 ,000,000
  (/>
  c 800,000
  TZ  600,000
  
-------
  Many Purification Plants were
   Constructed in the Same Era
   20
cE
£ §10
«J =
i= E
" ~ 5
    0
      Total capacity:  59.5 million m3/day

-------
  160,000
-§140,000
~120,000
!>100,000
0 80,000
"I 60,000
^ 40,000
  20,000
      0
         Aging Pipelines were
           Partially Replaced
        -1940 41-50 51-60 61-7071-80 81-90 1991-
               Year of pipeline installation

-------
The risk of breakdown and
dysfunction in the drinking water
infrastructure increases with time.
A well-planned improvement
program must be implemented to
sustain a high level of trust in the
drinking water supply.

-------
Investments for Construction are Declining
and Renewal of the Aging Infrastructure
has Stagnated
       2,000

       1,500
       1,000
     £  500
     0) O
     £ <°  ^
     £00
     co ^
           1996  1998  2000  2002  2004  2006
                        Year

-------
  By 2025, the Cost of Renewal
    Will Exceed Investments
(Assuming that Investments decrease by 1% each year)
0
c
o
0
0
c
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
(Investments
           1
                               Stock
                         Cost of Renewal
      65 70
         80 85 90 95
           05 10 15 20
30 35 40 45
                                        0
                                      50
                             40 c
                               O
                                      30
                             2
                             0
                             10
            O
            <
            o
            o
                                        
-------
Performance assessment of the aging
    infrastructure is indispensable

 The renewal of the drinking water infrastructure
 has stagnated due to:
 -A severe financial strain caused by declining
   water demand/income and a weak economy
 Considering these factors, we have to:
 - Implement a we 11-structured program to
   improve the infrastructure
 - Invest capital efficiently to improve the
   infrastructure
 - Understand clearly the current infrastructure
   performance levels

-------
            The Japan Water Research
            Center (JWRC) has
,tsMsa         developed methods to:
             • Assess the performance
             of the drinking water
             infrastructure
             •Determine the framework
             for improvements

            The guidance manual was
            published in 2005, and
            distributed to the water
            utilities by the Ministry of
            Health, Labour and Welfare.
                                    10

-------
               Required Functions
 Required functions
      Main scope of function(s)
Basic functions
Water quality, pressure, quantity, etc.
Structural functions
Construction, material quality, performance

efficiency methods
Operative functions
Control, operation
Maintenance functions
Maintenance activities
Safety functions
Safety policies
Environmental
functions
Environmental protection, conservation
                                                        11

-------
 05
 E

 I
 0
 0.
         Declining Performance
            and Improvements
    Performance levels
       at installation
Perrowjiance
 decline
                         Required performance
                         desirable levels
                          y Improved
                           performance levels
o

«
      Performance
      assessment and
      improvements
      E
                          t 2
                          m o.
                            E
Installation
            Present
Future
                                             12

-------
  Procedure to Assess Performance
           and Improvements
   Overall Plant Performance
        Assessment
            Individual Facility
          Performance Assessment
                Results of performance
                    assessment
Judge improvement
     needs
      Are
required performance
 Jevels being

    No
              Select optimal measure(s) to
                 improve performance
                Implement improvement
                     measures
Yes
                                             13

-------
Overall Plant Performance Assessment
         Prepare
        data sheet
   Calculate
   assessment indices
   Calculate
   assessment scores
 Obtain data from daily
 operation and management
Judge earthquake resistance
using check sheets
    Convert to scores
    based on indices
  Identify weak functions and
  areas of poor performance
                           Benchmark scores
                                            14

-------
     Detail of the Overall Plant
     Performance Assessment

Enter the necessary data in the data-sheet.
 e.g. Average amount of purified water per day (A)
       = 138,000m3/d
     Maximum amount of purified water per day  (B)
       = 180,000 m3/d
Calculate various evaluation indices based
on the data
 e.g. Loading rate of Purification Plant
       = (A)/(B)X100%
       = 138,000/180,000X100 = 76.7

-------
 Apply these indices to the standard tables
 below to obtain a score for each item.
  Evaluation index
                          coring criteria
                               1
                            0
 Loading rate (%
80 - 100
        60-69
       Outside these ranges
 Effective Operating

 Rate %
70-89
90 - 100
60-69
Outside these ranges
 Available Operating

 Rate %
120 - 129
110- 119
100-109

130-149
Outside these ranges
•Lower scores indicate poor performance.
•The sum of all scores provides an overall
score for a particular purification plant.
•These scores allow different plants to be
compared.                                 1

-------
Example of Overall Plant Performance

         Assessment Results
                  Score
                        1
                                        CO
                                        CM
                   if if
           if if
           V  V
              if if
                 Indices
                         | | |

                              TV
I » i
Miia -fe< Mh
                                       M"

                       46
                            m
Loading rate of the purification plant

         Score = 2
     17

-------
     Individual Facility

Performance Assessment

 Answer several prepared questions
   about performance for each of
   the facilities and/or equipment
           Calculate
        evaluative scores
    Identify facilities/equipment

      with poor performance
                                    18

-------
       Example  of Facilities to be Assessed
Cate-
gory
 Facility/equipment
Cate-
gory
Facility/equipment
Cate-
gory
Facility/equipment
  (0
  o
  ts
  o
      Intake weir,
      intake tower ,
      intake gate,
      intake culvert, crib
      Submerged
      catchment pipes,
      shallow well,
      deep well
      Grit chamber
      Receiving well
      Chemical feeder
Coagulation basin
Sedimentation basin
      Rapid sand filter
      Slow sand filter
      Membrane filtration
      facility
                      CD
                      o
                          Clear water reservoir

                                Sludge drying bed
                          Disinfecting facility
                                Dehydration facility
                          Aeration facility
                          Powdered activated
                          carbon facility
      Granular activated
      carbon facility
                          Ozonation facility
      Biological treatment
      facility
      Iron and manganese
      removal facility
                          Drained water basin,
                          sludge basin
                          Thickener
                           « i o
                           CO « *-
                           •- <*"» 3
                           I- Q -0
                                Regulating reservoir
                        Distribution
                        reservoir
                                               CO
                                               •*-•
                                               c
                                               CD
                                                      CO
                                Pump
                        Voltage transforming
                        equipment
                        Emergency power
                        generator
                     CD

                     Q.
                     "3
                     CJ
                     LU
  o
  "l_
  +•«
  o
  ED
      Power control
      equipment
                        Instrumentation
                        equipment
                                Monitoring & control
                                equipment

-------
    Detail of the Individual Facility
       Performance Assessment

  There are predetermined questions (about
  20 questions for each facility), which cover
  four areas of performance. The score for
  each question depends on the answer.
      Questions
         Answers
                         Scores
Is the amount of chlorine injection
adjusted appropriately for the
amount and quality of water?
Noproblem
         __ _^  (100)
    be sufficient, but generajT£goSr3> (50)
Sometimes causes problems.    _ (0)
                           5 0
Are there any problems in injection,
such as leaks and scale buildup?
Noproblem               (100)
Maynot be sufficient, but generally good (50)
Sometimes causes problems.   " ^>   (0)
                           0
                                             20

-------
The scores for the questions in each
performance area are summed, and used
as the overall score for the performance
area. The score of the lowest performance
area provides a representative value for
the performance evaluation score of the
facility. Facilities with lower scores mean
that the performance of the facility has
deteriorated.
This method allows different types of
facilities to be directly compared.
                                    21

-------
    Example of Individual Facility
Performance Assessment Results (1)
    100
    80
   CD 60
   o
   O40
   CO
    20
        Average score
       m
    >H
         Fff
         SB
0*
 Jfi
         Disinfection
           facility
 Equipment
and/or facility
 II SB  SB
               SB
PAC adsorption
   facility

-------
     Example of Individual Facility
Performance Assessment Results (2)
    Disinfection facility
          PAC adsorption facility
         Overall score
                 Overall score
                 100
                 Basic
                 performance
         Technical
         level
              Basic
              performance
   Aging
Management
conditions
Aging
Management
conditions
                                             23

-------
Determining the Improvement Needs
            and Framework
 Identify the reasons for declining performance
   \7
Impact of functional breakdown =
   (Affected peoplexperiodxfrequency)
 Judge improvement needs
 Select optimal
 improvement strategies
 Formulate a framework
 for improvements
                Efficiency, rationality,
                and financial impact of
                proposed strategies
                                          24

-------
           Conclusions
The current performance assessment method
is not adaptable to assess pipeline
performance.
A comparable method to assess pipeline
performance is greatly needed.
Since 2008 JWRC has been developing a
performance assessment method specifically
for the pipeline, as part of research
subsidized by the Ministry of Health, Labour
and Welfare.
JWRC is also improving the current
performance assessment method using
several case-study analyses.             25

-------
 Thank you very much
    for your attention
Japan Water Research Center
   http://www.jwrc-net. or.jp/
                             26

-------
Additional Slides
                       27

-------
      How did two peaks
in the investment chart occur?
The first peak was due to facility
construction in response to combining
and integrating the existing water
supply areas. This was triggered by the
national subsidy program.
The second peak was due to active
facility construction funded by the
national subsidy program again for
Advanced Treatment Facilities.
                                 28

-------
      Serviceable lifetime of
 purification plants and pipelines

Local Public Enterprise Law specifies:
   40 years for pipelines
   60 years for reinforced concrete
              structures
   20 years for electrical facilities
   15 years for pumping facilities and
              chemical injection facilities
   10 years for disinfection facilities
                                     29

-------
The major improvements in the existing
   performance assessment manual

   • Clear definitions of the terminology
    used in the manual
   • Detailed explanations on the
    implementation of assessment
   • Examples of data entries and
    calculations in the forms
                                   30

-------
 Required number of data and
  evaluation items to evaluate
   different types of facilities
 Type of facility
  Required data
(number of data to be
entered in data sheet)
  Number of
evaluation items
Intake station
          65
       17
Water conveyance
pumping station
          16
       10
Water purification
plant	
          79
       22
Water transmission
station
          16
       10
Water distribution
pumping station
          47
       26
                                         31

-------
Determining the improvement
     needs and framework
First, possible causes for performance
degradation are considered.
  e.g. Broken or deteriorated components,
     out- of-date technology, etc.
The magnitude of the impact is estimated in
the case of breakdown.
    - Number of affected people
    - Duration of the event
    - Frequency of the event
                                   32

-------
•  Improvement strategies and methods are
  proposed.
   e.g. Updating facilities, replacement of
      component parts, consolidating with
      similar facilities, etc.
•  Then to determine the final improvement
  measure, the following is evaluated for each
  strategy/method:
     - Efficiency
     - Rationality
     - Financial impact
•  It is also necessary to determine beforehand
  which evaluation criteria is the most important.
                                           33

-------
Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
           Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
    Sustainability: The Las Vegas Approach
                 Mr. Richard B. Holmes
           Director of Environmental Resources
             Southern Nevada Water Authority

-------
SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY
           Sustainability:
         The Las Vegas Approach

             Richard B. Holmes,
        Director of Environmental Resources

               March, 2009

-------
             Mission, Vision and Values
Mission
 - Partner to provide reliable, quality water, ensuring the sustainability
   of our desert community and serving our customers responsibly.

Vision: "People Leading the Way"
 - Partnering with our diverse community in sustaining water resources
 - Partnering to provide quality service that exceeds expectations
 - Partnering to be stewards of resources for future generations

Values
 - Respect for People
 - Integrity
 - Service
 - Excellence
 - Sustainability

-------
Sustainability Strategic Plan
     Water
     Energy
     Public education, outreach and
     partnerships
     Organizational and individual behavior

-------
Southern Nevada
                 Desert Environment
                1 Average rainfall of 4.5"
                •  Peak temps of 110+
                1  13 rain events annually
                1  250 new residents daily
                1  40 million visitors yearly

-------
                Metered Water Consumption
2006 SNWA Service Area Municipal Metered Water Consumption
                       2006 Municipal Metered Water Consumption
                             Use By Customer Type
                      Common Areas
                         4.9%
Other
4.1%
                  Schools/Govt/Rarks
                     4.8%
                   Golf Courses
                     7.4%
                     Resorts
                     6.8%
                Commercial / Industrial
                    13.5%
                              Residential (MF)
                                14.7%
                                             Residential (SF)
                                               43.8%

-------
    Single Family Household Water Use
80.0%




70.0%




60.0%




50.0%




40.0%




30.0%




20.0%




10.0%




 0.0%
69.2%

Cons







>umptive Us 6




Non- Consumptive Uses

8-2% 6.7% 51% 4 oo/ .y.
*^. l /O t.O/0 *l.fc/0
i 	 1 n 7% n 5% 0 4%
i i ii


-------
             Water Conservation
The SNWA's aggressive mix of incentives, regulations,
  education and pricing has created one of the most
   recognized conservation programs in the nation.
                 Conservation Toolbox

-------
Water Conservation
      Key Policies



      • Seasonally-restricted watering schedules
       Turf conversion & restrictions
        Golf course water budgets



        Incentive programs
       Water waste enforcement
        Rates to encourage conservation

-------
             Water Conservation
The Water Smart Landscape Program provides a cash
  incentive to commercial and residential customers to
      convert grass to water efficient landscaping.

-------
                 Water Conservation
From inception of SNWA Water Smart Landscape program in 1999:
• More than 11 million square meters of turf has been removed
• More than 25 billion litres of water saved annually

-------
       Water Conservation
  The SNWA's conservation programs
    have demonstrated real results.
   There has been a cultural change
in the way Southern Nevadans use water.

-------
           Conservation Achievements
  400,000
 300,000
2
o
  200,000 -
co
  100,000 -
       0
/
_
325,000
1
_
_
270,000 265,000 265.000 265,000







/•
>79,000
1
           2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
 Southern Nevada's consumptive water use declined approximately
15 percent between 2002 and 2007, despite the fact that there were
 nearly 400,000 new residents and nearly 40 million annual visitors.

-------
          Conservation Achievements
     1990 - 2008 Gallons Per Capita Per Day (GPCD)
                     Water Usage
400]
   347 344  339 337
             329 327 329
                    322 317 315 315  318 314
                    GOAL 250 GPCD BY 2010
                  ]  GOAL 199 GPCD BY 2035
                                    294
                                      274 269 264
——|r-—-|   255
Tflnn
249
  1990   1992   1994   1996   1998   2000   2002   2004   2006  2008 Est.
                        Calendar Year

-------
    WaterSmart Innovations Conference

First-of-its-kind event held annually
World's largest conference on urban water management
and efficiency
More than 1,300 participants
Attendees from  17 different nations
More than 160 professional sessions
More than 140 exhibits

   * 4
 watersmartOS
         I N N O VAT IONS

-------
                      Energy - Fleet
Goal: 100 percent alternative-fueled vehicle fleet by 2015
• Currently, 79 percent alternative-fueled fleet
   - Biodiesel
   - Compressed natural gas
   - Hybrid
  2008 Alternative Fuel Vehicle Institute
  (AFVI) Green Ribbon Award
  Named the seventh best "green" fleet in
  North America by Government Fleet
  Magazine
  In 2007, completed construction of a solar-
  driven hydrogen refueling station

-------
Energy - Power Supply
    Silverhawk Power Generation Facility
    SNWA holds 25 percent interest
    570-megawatt power plant
    "Dry cooled" power plant that produces
    electricity using one-tenth of the water
    consumed by traditional "wet-cooled"
    power plants

-------
              Energy - Power Supply
LVVWD Distributed Solar Array project
  - Solar panels at six LVVWD storage and
    distribution sites
  - 3.1 megawatt sites will collectively produce
    about 5.3 million kWh (kilowatt hours) per
    year
SNWA designing 450 kW of solar photovoltaic
systems to power two water treatment facilities
  - Combined, will generate approximately
    920,000 kWh (kilowatt hours) per year
  - Equivalent energy usage of more than 60
    Las Vegas households

-------
Energy - Power Supply
    Approximately 10 percent of SNWA's annual
    power supply comes from Hoover Dam
    hydro power

    SNWA has developed hydropower projects at
    three Rate of Flow Control Stations (ROFCS)

      -  Generate more than 2 megawatts combined

    Ground water Project

      -  Potential for half of power requirements to be
        generated by in-line turbines (more than 30
        megawatts)

      -  Remainder of power requirements to be
        provided from renewable energy sources
        (solar, wind, geothermal)

-------
       Environmental Stewardship
Development of new resources can not come at the
    expense of the surrounding environment.
     The SNWA is proactively engaged in a
     number of efforts to safeguard Nevada
         and protect the environment.

Examples:
   - Las Vegas Wash
   - Development of in-state groundwater resources

-------
                   Las Vegas Wash
Primary discharge point for treated wastewater flows
Critical in protecting the region's primary water supply
$165 million effort among local, state and federal
agencies
Revegetated nearly 80 hectares of wetlands habitat
Constructed 11 erosion control structures
Stabilized more than 8.8 km of embankment
Removed more than 225,000 Kg of trash
50 percent decrease in total suspended solids
Significant reductions in other contaminants
Increased habitat for bird, fish, mammal and reptilian
species

-------
Groundwater Development Project
                   NT->
                   MARK
                                Spring Valley
                                Snake Valley
                                Cave Valley
                                Dry Lake Valley
                                Delamar Valley

                                Coyote Spring Valley

-------
     Groundwater Development Project
When granting applications, the State Engineer
considers:


 - Is there water available from the proposed source
   (perennial yield of groundwater basin)?

 - Will the application conflict with existing rights?

 - Will granting the applications be in the public interest?

 - Will it interfere with domestic wells?

-------
Groundwater Development Project
                         Hydrological Monitoring

                       Developing highly
                       sophisticated ground and
                       surface water monitoring
                       network

                       Installed real-time data
                       collection at various sites

                       Installed evapotranspiration
                       stations

-------
Groundwater Development Project
                      Hydrological Monitoring

                  Partnered with USGS and Desert
                  Research Institute

                  Developing comprehensive
                  groundwater model characterizing
                  aquifer
                SNWA will have more than 180 groundwater
                and surface water monitoring locations,
                providing an early warning system to avoid
                adverse impacts.

-------
       Groundwater Development Project
     Biological Monitoring

Conducted pedestrian surveys of
400 miles of proposed alignment
and alternatives

Logged each sensitive plant species
within the proposed alignment
(GPS)

Documented all flora and fauna
within the proposed alignment

Conducted regional studies of areas
outside the alignment to better
understand the characteristics of
the basins

-------
        Groundwater Development Project
       Biological Monitoring

 Conducted extensive bird, reptile and
 small mammal surveys

 Conducted a comprehensive invasive
 weed survey of 23,000 acres

 Partnered with the Smithsonian
 Institute to study spring snails

 Characterized ecological conditions of
 over 100 springs in project area
The SNWA hired expert botanists in the
region to assist with the gathering of
sensitive plant species information

-------
Sustainability - The Las Vegas Approach
           Water
            - Conservation
           Energy
            - Fleet
            - Power Supply


           Environmental Stewardship
            "Las Vegas Wash
            - Ground water Development Project

-------
SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY

-------
 Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
            Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
  Sewer Management in Japan - an Overview
                 Mr. Takashi Sakakibara
   Head, Wastewater and Sludge Management System Division
             Water Quality Control Department
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM)
         Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Tourism

-------
     Sewer Management in Japan
             -an overview
I L I
Takashi SAKAKIBARA, Yosuke MATSUMIYA,
            Yasuo FUKUDA
    Wastewater System Division, NILIM, MLIT

-------
  Introduction of NILIM - Wastewater System Div.
 H I L I
I
 Wastewater Planning
  Asset Management, Quick-construction project
  Technical strategy for wastewater engineering

 Sewer System Maintenance
  Road cave-in problem v  storage pit problem
 Stormwater Control
  CSO control, rainfall infiltration enhancement
  Communication method in heavy rainfall
| Watershed Management
  Northwest Pacific Sea Marine Env. Protection
        National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
             Presentation Outline
I L I
1. Sewers in Japan
   - statistical overview

2. Sewers Asset Management
   -current status in Japan

3. Research Topics
   - for better Sewer
Asset Management Plan
1 180,000
! 160,000
: _ 140,000
! -6,120,000
| | 100,000
I | 80,000
I g 60,000
! 40,000
!
• 20,000
0
i
!
Annual c ave-in case




P




• .•i.i.n.n.n.n. .,v
1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 197


rfl ''

i El =

t:;;: !
0 1990

— HI Annual Cave-in case _•_ Total sewer


M\\\\IMC\\
nil j'j)'
(Inn,
— Ji

& <#• # <#> ^ ^ ^ ^
year
length T 420 :
J "0 '
XL li
n li
1|
|i
fe •
u :
ift :
3 :
^ ^
  March 3,2009
           National Institute for Land and Infrastraure Management

-------
              Presentation Outline
N I L I M
 1. Sewers in Japan
   - statistical overview

 2.  Sewers Asset Management
   -current status in Japan

 3. Research Topics
   "for better Sewer Asset Management Plan
  March 3,2009
            National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
          Closing Gap on SPR, JP-US
so
0s-

^
&
C
0
« i-H
^— >
J3
3
dn
O
PLH
-G

00
100
80
60
40
20
0

J
-£©
^ Tar\ar| T 7
JdLJClll
• us • • o*
^

•

                                                   84% of
                                                   sanitary
                                                   treatment
                                                   ;rat(
1960
1970    1980
1990    2000
                                              2010
       Source; US data: Needs Survey, JP data: Budget Request Outline 2008
March 3,2009
            National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
A
  I L I  M
    14,000

    12,000

    10,000
c 8,000
o
 6,000

 4,000

 2,000

    0
Declining Capital Expenditure, JP
                  Sewerage Capital Expenditure

                                               60,000


                                               50,000


                                               40,000


                                               30,000


                                               20,000


                                               10,000


                                               0
                                                                   .

                                                                   §
Source; US data: A retrospective Assessment of the Costs of the Clean Water Act 1972 to 1997,
JP data: Sewerage Budget Request Outline 2008 MLIT
    March 3,2009                                                          6
                  National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
I L I
  180,000

  160,000

_ 140,000

^120,000

I 100,000

°  80,000
tb
g  60,000

   40,000

   20,000

        0
           1870
                   Sewer of JP is younger
            n  ,n  ,n  ,n
                   1890
1910
1930
1950
1970
1990
        Histogram of Sewer Installation Length per decade
          Source; US data: Gap Analysis, JP data: New Info by Our Research
  March 3,2009
                National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
              Presentation Outline
M 1 L I M
 1. Sewers in Japan
    - statistical overview

 2. Sewers Asset Management
    -current status in Japan

 3. Research Topics
    "for better Sewer Asset Management Plan
   March 3,2009
8
            National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
A
Current Sewer O&M
    Experience based approach by big cities
    Baby boomers retirement & downsizing
    Neglected O&M by Small/Medium Cities, due
    to insufficient resource; human & finance
    Need for AM approach for all cities
   March 3,2009
            National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
I I  I M
      7000
      6000
GO 5000

eg
S 4000

u
^ 3000
      2000
      1000
        0
  March 3,2009
             Increasing Road Cave-Ins,
             as Consequence of Failure
              Annual Cave-in case
         \
                        Total sewer length
420


360^
   E
   _^
300 ^
   cd

240 o
                                                            180
                                                               W)
                                                         120 ft
                                                           £
                                                           

                                                         60 13
                                                           -(—>
                                                           o
                                                           -<—>

                                                         0
                year
           Source: Sewerage Budget Request Outline 2008
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
                                                             10

-------
Source: Sewerage Budget Request
Outline 2008 (left) & Tokyo
Metropolitan Gov website (right)
    March 3,2009
                                                                                   •  I L I M
11
                     National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
                 Where do  thev ha
  public sewer g.]  =  [©public sewer] + [©joint between PS. & M.] + [©Joint between^
PS.&Lat]
 [lateral g.]  =  [©lateral] +  [©Joint between PS. & Lat] +  [©joint between Lat. &
M.]
            + [©joint between Lat. & CO.]
 [manhole g.]    = [©manhole] + [© joint between PS. & M.] +  [©joint between Lat.
 [clean out g.]
ioint between T jtf. &
               si
   March 3,2009
                                    12
                  National Ing£itut^for/.and and Infrastructure Management

-------

   25
0)
w
E  20
             Laterals Blamed Most,
              Exponential Increase
Source: Proceedings of Research
Conference 2008, JSWA
* Public Sewer related
• Lateral related
A Manhole related
x Cleanout related
                                       y = 0.0497e
                                       .___R?__=_QjB6Q3.
                                                0.09C3x
                                      y = 0.0751e
                                          =0.8671
                                               0.0607>
                                                0.078
                                        y = 0.0144e
                                         -^-=0.8275
                                                0.051
                                         = 0.0334e
                                          R2 = 0.7121
                                            3x
     0   10
March 3,2009
       20   30   40   50   60   70   80   90  100
                    age
      National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
                 13

-------
A
Flat or Downward O&M Expenditure
  2,000
  1600
 CD
 >^

 a
 o
 o
 o
 C/3
 o
 u
  1,200
   800
   400
     0
             Sewer Length  -A- Expenditure on Sewer O&M
         Sour
      Pr
>ceeding
sofR
search Con fen nc
e2
ILIM
                                          500
                                          400
                                             o
                                             o
                                             o
                                          300
                                             60


                                          200^


                                             o5

                                             CD

                                          100^
                                          0
               National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
                                                         14

-------
A
^^•^
N I L  I I
 mno
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
      ^7
      &>
          What are Major Cities doing for AM?
  March 3,2009
                        v


                                           4?
                                                               D Not Planed

                                                               D Considering

                                                               • Underway

                                                               D Completed
                                       Source: New Info by Our Research
                                                                    15
                National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
A
Presentation Outline
 1. Sewers in Japan
    - statistical overview

 2. Sewers Asset Management
    -current status in Japan

 3. Research Topics
    "for better Sewer Asset Management Plan
   March 3,2009
            National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
                                 16

-------
     Our research goal for Sewer AM
 Average Survival Curve (ASC)
 =>Long term budget planning for financial sustainability
 •  How many kilometers of failed sewers that need rehabilitation
    exist now?
 •  How fast do those sewers increase in future?
 •  How many kilometers of sewers need survey every year?

 Risk Evaluation Tool on Failed Sewers for Prioritization of
 Necessary Actions
 =>Long term work program for sewer service sustainability
 •   Which sewers should be surveyed & rehabilitated first?
 •   Which sewers are likely to be failing ?
 •   How big are the consequences of failed sewers? How much is
    a sewer collapse damage?
March 3,2009
17
            National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
             How to draw ASC ?
I L t
 3) ASC by integration of SCS&SCR
   =>Shows ASC with no rehab
   Survival Curve using Survey data (SCS) ^^^^^^^
   ^Collect CCTV & Eye Inspection data from 2,700 km
   Sewers. Death defined by deterioration level.  ||||||||
   Survival Curve using Rehab incl. Repair &
   Replacement
   => Use rehab length data for 400,000km of entire  |1||1
   nationwide sewers in 2006. Death defined by Rehab &
      Replacement
                                                 18
            National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
            Grading Criteria  for Sewer Span
 I L t
    Emergency category   Criteria of Assessment
                          Timing of Necessary Action
             critical  A doimnant
              bad   few A & B dominant
                       immediate
                      Wthin 5 years after makeshift repair
             not well No A, few B & C dominant [njafrears or later after makBshift
    Definition of 'Dead' sewers for SCS
    Dead: Emergency 1+2, most municipalities rehabilitate EM
    1 +2 sewers
    Alive: Emergency 3 & No Problem
    Underestimate for physical decay
   March 3,2009
2008/10/7
                                              19
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
                  CCTV Survey    of Sewer  Span
• I  L
M

                                        Criteria of Sewer Condition Assessment,
                                                           Example
 Mode by Span Basis
                                              B
 corrosion

 sag
            exposed metal bar

            Diameter or over
exposed gravel

Half Diameter or over
rough wall

below half diameter
 Mode by Pipe Basis
 fracture

 crack circumferential

 joint

 leak

 lateral projection
 root intrusion
 grease slime
 Mortar.
     Marr.h 3 ?OOQ
                   partially missing or
            longitudal crack of 5mm or
            5mm or over            2mm or over
                                longitudal crack of 2mm or over
            displaced

            splashing

            Half Diameter or over
            Half Diameter or over
            blocked
            30% diameter or over
            blocked
70mm open or over

runnig

1/10 Diameter or over

below Half Diameter blocked

10% diameter or over blocked
longitudal crack of below 2mm

below 2mm

below 70mm open

surface stain

below 1/10 Diameter

na

below 10% diameter blocked
                                                  20
                       National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
         Survival Curve bv Survev data: SCS
I L t
    100
     90
  «  80
  (S  70
  £  60
  =  50
     40
  S  30
  X  20
  «  10
Source: Proceedings of Research Conference 2008, JS WA
                           Age
  March 3,2009
             National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
                      • •     *••--
                      .V,       fV
                          ^^^     HH IJ
        0    10   20    30   40   50   60    70   80
                                         21

-------
      Survival Curve bv Rehab:  SCR
        0
March 3,2009
10
20    30
                  40
                 Age
   Source: Proceedings of Research Conference 2008, JSWA

National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
                                                    • I L I M
50    60    70    80
                 22

-------
             Actual Survival Curve
              13 yrs
                                                         • I L I M
                                                    82 yrs
March 3,2009
Source: Proceedings of Research Conference 2008, JSWA




National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
23

-------
          Conclusion & Necessary Research
• i L i
  3) Average Survival Curve for the estimate of work
     volume of Survey & Rehabilitation was gained.

     1.44 % of sewers over age 13 added each year to the
     work volume.

     Necessary to draw ASC by sewer material type as it is
     influential
   March 3,2009
24
              National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
        Risk evaluation based on sewer cave-in events
L I
   Sewer cave-ins are increasing, especially in major cities, totaling
   more than 4000 cases each year. Prevention of the cave-ins is
   requested socially.

   MLIT HQs & NILIM conduct national survey on sewer cave-ins
   every year. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

   Using the data, cave-in frequency prediction formula was
   developed as part of risk evaluation tool, gill 11111

© Currently, working on prediction model of damage magnitude by
   failed sewers to develop prioritization method for survey &  |1111
   rehabilitation
 March 3,2009
25
              National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
                Future necessary research
  [Valuated Risk ] =  [Cave-in damage cost] x [frequecy]  x [sewer
 lengthl	
             1.56(WlOOkm
     0
2008/10/7
                               ^   Risk Valuation    N\

                                  By span or Area

                                   Prioritization of
                                  action; survey &
                               V	mhah	J

                                    Damage cost
                                     prediction

                                Possible parameters;
                                time & cost for repair
                                 work, traffic density,
                                  depth of sewers
                                                   Under Research
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
26

-------
 Thank you for your attention
March 3,2009
        National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
                Image of Budget Annuity
• I L I H
   March 3,200
28
               National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management

-------
   Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
               Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
                                                 st
Sustainable Water Infrastructure for the 21  Century
                     Dr. James A. Goodrich
                  Senior Environmental Scientist
          National Risk Management Research Laboratory
               Office of Research and Development
               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
Sustainable Water
Infrastructure for the
21st Century (Total
Water Management)
James A. Goodrich, Ph.D.
Nicholas J. Ashbolt, Ph.D.
  Office of Research and Development
  National Risk Management Research Laboratory
                           March 3, 2009

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
     Developed Countries with Decaying
    Infrastructure and Developing Regions
  Appear to be on Unsustainable Pathways
  •Systems are aging
  •Populations are increasing and shifting
   geographically
  •Current treatment may not be sufficient
  •Research investment has declined
  •Central vs. decentralized approaches
  •Climate change

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
      Water Infrastructure Sustainability and
    Adaptation in the 21st Century Requires a
              Paradigm Shift towards:

      Integration of water, energy and transport services
      Technological and institutional changes to orient the
      systems towards more sustainable water services
      Flexible and feasible tools that are able to
      holistically consider water quality, water quantity,
      management and reuse of separated 'waste'
      including wastewater streams, and the energy
      utilization efficiencies

-------
vvEPA
            Likely trends / Implications
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
   •Aging Infrastructure/Climate Change/Population
    Shifts:
     -Flood, drought, more intense storms, sewer overflows, power
      outages
     -Aging population, more prone to respiratory diseases
      (Legionellosis etc.)
   • Need to reduce greenhouse gases:
     -Move less water over shorter distances/recycle, particularly reuse
      of grey water with in homes
     -Water footprint vs. Carbon footprint
   • Renewable energy/recovery:
     -Utilize energy within 'wastes' / energy recovery
     -Urban agriculture / recycle of local nutrients

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
    Urban Water Cycle is no longer
              Sustainable

  1. Big-Pipe-In/Big-Pipe-Out approach of
    the last 150 years not adequate to
    address future needs
  2. Need for nutrient recycling to
    agriculture
  3. Water-energy nexus

-------
vvEPA
                The Formidable Challenges
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
         Do we know enough to adapt?

         What is the uncertainty in predictions? And how

         to deal with it?

         What methods and techniques are available?

         What science and engineering can do?


             Success of our efforts in meeting the challenge
             hinges on two essential elements:

              - Our ability to identify the natural variation
                components for adaptation;

              - Our ability to determine the anthropogenic
                causes of climate change for mitigation

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
vvEPA
                 Research Questions
                     and Topics

     1.  Downscaling, and how to use it in local
        applications
     2.  Predictions of impacts on hydrology and
        water quality in watershed scales
     3.  Engineering information and tools
     4.  Planning and engineering of water
        infrastructure for sustainability

-------
Cone of Relative Uncertainty
                               Potential
                               Scenarios
                     Future Horizon
     Increasing Uncertainty

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
           The nation's demographic pattern
                 35
            _ro

            5^
            o> f.
            (/).=

            CD

            o
                  0
                  f  _ s  _ ^  _ /  ^x  ^>  ^y  ^y  ^>  ^>  ^y

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
          Water Use Trends  in  the  U.S.
300
       U  Public supply
       I  RuraI domestic and livestock
       Q  Irrigation
       Q  Thermoelectric power
       •  Other industrial use
       — Total withdrawals
                                                      400
                                                         O
    1950 1955  1960  1965  1970  1975 1980  1985 1990  1995  2000
                                       Source: USGS Circular 1268

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
           Population shifts
                        Mean Center of Population for the United States  1790 to 2000

-------
&EPA
    United States
    Environmental Protection
    Agency
                                » 9SO        1 9&O



                            People per square mile of land



                                             ipolna
                                                                              ••••'

                                         '- ' • ••" •  ; ' ' : •
                                                       -
                                                                   .
•SO        I9&O


            dvcennial
                                                        ~O


                                                        of c«-p
                                                                  MO
                                                                             • •


-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
     Changing patterns in land use density
        Average
       opulation p<
       square mile
10,000
* P-Q n HA
8nnn -
7r\fin
6rtrtrt

4nnn

2nnn
Ir'irt A
n -
fhe average density of the urban population
started a dramatic decline after 1 950
(The 1 OO largest cities)
— ~~ 	 ' 	 v
\

_i^^^r
—




                   191Q  192O  193O 194O 195O 19SO
                                 Years
197O 198O  1990

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
      A particular situation is a reflection of the

      demographic patterns of the specific region

                Seven Metropolitan Regions That Currently Have Similar Service
                                Populations
         O
         O
         01
         a
         Q_
         O
         a.

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
            2.0%
                     T       I    I    I        I    I    I    I
               1870    1890    1910    1930    1950    1970    1990

                                    Year Installed
              10: A}


-------
&EPA
   United Slates
   Environmental Protection
   Agency

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
        More pipe in lower condition levels
        will impact costs and performance
                       Excellent
                       Good
                       Fair
             1980
2000
           Poor
       |   | Very Poor
           Life Elapsed
2020
                            Approximately 2 - 2.5 Million Miles Woter /
                               Wastewater: Public / Private

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
    Water / wastewater systems are capital intensive
       Net Plant /
        Revenue
                       Water   Divers.    Local    Gas     Gas
                                Tel,   Exch. Tel, Pipelines  Distrib.
Electric
     Purvenas, T.J., "Infrastructure Replacement -Credit Quality Concerns" Water, Spring 1998,
       •ional Association of Water Companies, Washington, D»C.	

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
                Water, sewerage and  drainage (30 to 35%)
                of All Capital Investment in an urban lot
                                  Education
                                             Rec
              Health
                            Transport
                    T el ecomtriuni ca tio

                      re and Postal
                      Electricity and Gas
              An Austraian study on the relative capital
              costs of all forms of infrastructure investment
              to serve a typical lot rn Melbourne.
Roads
                                                          Water Supply
                                                             Drainage
               Sewerage
         Water Resource

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
       The projected growth alone, could produce
       BODj loadings similar to the mid-1970s
               25000
               20000
               15000
               10000
                5000
      Source: USE PA, Progress in Water
      Quality: An Evaluation of the
      Notional Investment in Municipal
      Wastewater Treatment, June 20CXX
1968  1972   1978   1996  2016

   BODu (Metric Tons Per Day)
                                                    2O25

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
                   Water Resource Integrity


       Source Water Quality Integrity
        • Treatment and maintenance of finished water quality


       Hydraulic Integrity
        • Refers to the maintenance of a desirable water flow, water
         pressure  and water age while providing potable drinking water
         and fire flow


       Physical Integrity
        • Maintenance of physical barrier between the distribution,
         collection, and wastewater treatment system and the external
         environment

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
   Water resources are vulnerable to
   contamination through:
   • Contaminated source water
   • Backflow
   • Intrusion
   • Tanks,
   • Cross-connections
   • Deliberate injection
   • Treatment by-pass

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
   Climate Change DBF Precursor Impacts
   NOM
   Algae
   Bromide
   PH
   Temperature
THMs Increased
DHANs Increased
Brominated
Increased/TTHM shift
Variable by DBP class
and pH
Increase most in high
temperature sources

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
         Unregulated (Emerging) DBFs
     More than 600 DBFs have been identified
     Little known about occurrence and toxicity of
   unregulated DBFs
     Mostly in vitrocyto-and genotoxicitytests in current
   thrust of health effects research
     Still considerable need to link these tests to
   carcinogenicity and human health effects

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
     Health Effects Data for Emerging DBFs

    Brominated DBFs are more cytotoxic and genotoxic than the
    chlorinated analogues
    Indication that the iodo-substituted DBFs (iodoacids) are of
    health concern (cytotoxic and genotoxic) (in-vitro studies)

    Nitrogenous DBFs (N-DBPs) may be of greater health concern
    than the carbonaceous DBFs
    Iodo-substituted DBFs and N-DBPs occur at significantly lower
    concentrations ,but some toxicity indices suggest orders of
    magnitude greater potency

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
^EPANET 2 - Net3.inp
 File   E.dit  View  Project  .Report  Window  H
              IZ1
                    ] Network Map
                                                      LEI

                                    RIVER
                                      Day 1, 12:00 AM
                  LAKE
                      TRACE LAKE
                      20.00
                      40.00
                      60.00
                      80.00
                      percent
                  Flow Units: GPM
                     Zoom: 1 00
Run Status:

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency

-------
       The Distribution System as Reactor
                      PIPE SURFACE
                                              Red ox
                                             Reactions
         Detachment
                              Heterotcophs  Conforms
    ¥77777777
    L / / / / / / /
    Biofilm/regrowth
(g) 1996 CENTER FOR BIOFILM ENGINEERING, MSU-BOZEMAN
                                                        14/B96CS

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Need for water / nutrient
   recycling
    Urban waters: resource or risk?

-------
  I States
Environmental Protection
Agency
            We need a paradigm shift
Current: use water once & disposal
     http://www.ecosanservices.org
                           Resource recycle instead of disposal

-------
   Fnuirnnmental
Drinking water
Household wat
Rain water
Options for households
         Water fit-for-purpose
         Source separation
                                      Irrigation
                             Yellow water
                             treatment
                                    Energy
                                    recovery
           www.urbanwater.org

       Ashbolt et a/. (2006) In: 2nd IWA Leading-Edge on Sustainability in
       Water-Limited Environments. WEMS vol 10, IWA Publishing, London,

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
Aspect
Human waste
Stormwater / used
water
Demand & Supply
Quality
Cycle
Treatment
infrastructure
Scale
Diversity
Integration (physical)
Integration
(institutional)
Old Paradigm
Nuisance (odorous, pathogens)
Nuisance (flooding, should be removed quickly)
Build supply capacity to meet growing demand
Treat all to drinking quality
Once through
'Grey' - i.e., unnatural, engineered systems
Centralized: bigger is better (economies of scale)
Standardize: limit complexity
Water, stormwater, sewage separated physically
Water, stormwater and sewage managed by
different authorities / departments, under
different budgets
New Paradigm
Resource (nutrients back to agriculture)
Resource (alternate water source, should be
retained, reused or allowed to infiltrate where
possible)
Manage demand in line with resource (supply)
limits.
Supply water Tit-for-purpose'
Reuse, reclaim, recycle
Mimic or include use of natural ecosystem
services to purify water
Decentralized is an option (diseconomies of
scale); avoidance of inter-basin transfers
Allow diverse solutions, determined by local
needs and situations
Separation of water cycle is reduced because
'waste' water is reused not discharged
All phases of urban water cycle managed in
coordination, allowing physical integration
and reuse

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
Aging Water Infrastructure Research
                Program
                National Infrastructure Assessments
Economics and Life Cycle Cost    Condition

                          Assessment
                         Technology Demonstration and
                                 Verification
                             Outreach
               Advanced
               Concepts
                      Rehabilitation
             Innovative Wastewater Treatment Technologies
                  Integrated Management and Decision
                         Support Systems

-------
       Major Accomplishments

State of the Technology reviews and Technology
forums for CA-DW, CA-WW, Rehab
State of the Technology review report for nutrient
control technologies
Cooperative agreement RFA and eleven proposals
STAR Grant RFP for $6M leveraged with $1.5M
National infrastructure assess and adaptation report
and national experts/stakeholder workshop with OW
(Jan. 09)
Asset management workshop with OW

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
           National and Regional Infrastructure Assessment

      •Multi-scale infrastructure assessment
       -  Focus on future infrastructure planning and management
          considering future climates, land use and socioeconomic
          developments
       -  National and Regional assessment and adaptation reports
          (FY09-12)
       -  Water availability forecasting platform, methods and
          technologies in water reuse, water conservation and
          sustainable energy productions
       -  Climate prediction uncertainty management in infrastructure
          and water resources management
       -  Five tool boxes for end users:  engineering analysis, water
          availability forecasting, water reuse, water conservation, and
          sustainable energy

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
               CONCLUSIONS
   Asset Management Key to Sustainability
    -Must consider:
      •Aging infrastructure
      •Climate Change
      •Population Change
      •Institutional Impacts
      •Water and Energy Footprints

-------
                      ^m



                      I
thoug
111

                I!
                         T.T1T
                            a k:
   7fte sewer is the conscience of the city
  Victor Hugo, Les Miserables


-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
                          THANK YOU
                          Jim Goodrich
                          (513)569-7605
              Goodrich.iames@epa.gov

-------
   Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
             Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
Outline of Strategic Planning of Asset Management
  for Public Wastewater Treatment Plants in Japan
                     Mr. Hiroki Matsui
          Assistant Manager, Project Promotion Division
               Project Management Department
               Japan Sewage Works Agency (JS)

-------
Outline of Strategic Planning of
 Asset Management for Public
Wastewater Treatment Plants in
             Japan
          Hiroki MATSUI
      Project Promotion Division,
    Project Management Department
    Japan Sewage Works Agency (JS)
             Mar.2009

-------
      Outline of Contents
Needs of Sewage Systems in Japan
JS's Contribution to development of the
standard method of AM for WWTPs
Advantages of AM for WWTPs
Future plans of AM for WWTP

-------
           Water Pollution of Tokyo
                      in 1960's
Tokyo Bay in 1960's
A river of Tokyo
   in 1960's
A river of Tokyo
    in 1960's
   *Rapid urbanization and economic growth occurred in 1960's.

   * Wastewater was discharged into rivers and sea without
    Optimal treatment.
                           Photo CreditEnvironmental Bureau of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government

-------
Needs of Sewage Systems in Japan

 Needs of Sewage systems in urban area in
 Japan
 But, lack of engineers in local governments
       (especially, middle and small cities)
  Establishment of Japan Sewage
   Works Agency (JS) based on a
   special law in 1972, sponsored by
   central & local governments
   (a kind of public company)

-------
 Increase of the number of Wastewater
   Treatment Plants Supported by JS
2500
2000
1500
1000
 500
  0
     Number of WWTP Supported by JS
    • Total Number of WWTP in Japan
Over 60% of All public WWTPs in
  Japan were constructed by JS.
Replacement / improvement of old
facilities are needed for ensuring their
reliability and safety
            oo
                  oo
                     oo
                        oo
                                         (N
                                         (N

-------
Contribution to a Method of AM for
      Public WWTPs by JS (1)

JS has a lot of experience and essential
knowledge about sewage planning, design,
construction management, and maintenance.
JS has developed a method of AM for Public
WWTPs in Japan, including a practical manual
for checking and predicting facilities' condition
at WWTPs.

-------
Contribution to a Method of AM for
       Public WWTPs by JS (2)
 Developement this AM method for WWTPs
 (2005-2007)
 Actually used for 9 WWTPs. (2007-2008)
 the 1st edition of technical recommendation for
 AM (2008)

* At the moment, target facilities are WWTPs and
 Pumping stations.

-------
           PDCA Cycle in the AM
   Predict future
  condition of the
     facilities
            ACT
PLAN
  Make/Revise a plan for
replacement/ improvement of
     target facilities.

 DB
    DO
 Check present condition
    of all facilities
                       CHECK
               Perform the plan
               replacing / improving
               target facilities
"Repeated PDCA cycle"  is useful and important

-------
        How we check facilities.
(Example of parts of sludge collector(l))
      Main shaft (in water)
                   Checkpoints
                Factor of evaluation
                 ' rust, damage, vibration, etc.
         Class of Condition is Class 3.5
               Class of condition
5 (good)

-------
        How we check facilities.
(Example of parts of sludge collector(2))
1 (bad)
           Reduction gear
                                 Class of
                                 Condition
                                 is Class 4.2
Class of condition
5 (good)

-------
       Importance of PDCA Cycle (1)
  start
U
A deterioration curve
                                 Actually evaluated data
             Legal
             durable period
   0    5    10    15   20
         Operating duration

     1) Current situation
                 25
0
                                  change a deterioration
5    10   15   20   25
  Operating duration

2) Syears passed

-------
       Importance of PDCA Cycle (2)
u
   0
           Actually evaluated data
5   10   15   20
 Operating duration
25
      3) 10 and 15 years passed
                            U  2
0
                               A deterioration curve
5   10   15   20
  Operating duration
25
                        3) 20 and 23 years passed
       As the number of the plots increase, we can
       make more reliable curve.

-------
 Importance of "Micro" and "Macro"
        Management of WWTP

Both Micro and Macro management are very important to
  make a strategic future plan with AM.
   Micro Management
Macro Management

-------
     Advantages of AM for WWTPs
 Reduce asset ownership costs.

 Decision making tool for O&M chief officers
  Ex. Possible to know easily when to replace or
     improve old facilities.

• Enhancing accountability.

-------
   Future Plans of AM for WWTPs
  Collection and Analysis of effective Data
  for improving the deterioration curves
  for all facilities in typical WWTPs.
• Make the 2nd edition of technical
 recommendation

-------
            Conclusions
  Advantages of AM for WWTPs :
1. Reduce asset ownership costs.
2. Decision making tool for O&M chief officers.
S.Enh
  „
    ancing accountability.
Repeated PDCA cycle is important
and efficient

-------
Thank you for your attention
    for more information
 Hiroki-Matsui@j swa.go. j

-------
   Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
              Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
One Utility's Approach to Wastewater Sustainability
                     Ms. Karen Pallansch
                      General Manager
                 Alexandria Sanitation Authority

-------
One Utility's Approach to

Wastewater Sustainability
     Karen Pallansch, General Manager, Alexandria Sanitation Authority
   Japan-US Joint Conference on Drinking Water Quality Management and
                          Wastewater Control
                             March 3, 2009

-------
   Today s Presentation
         Who We Are at ASA...
         What does Sustainability Mean?
         Our Approach to the Triple Bottom Line
         What About the Future?
asa

-------
    54 MGD Advance
    Wastewater Treatment
    Facility
    Located on 30 acres in
    Alexandria, Virginia
    Five Member Citizen
    Board
    Staff of 128
    Discharge to
    Chesapeake Bay
    Facing stricter nutrient
    discharge limits
V '

as a"
JH.ilMUm <*H««H1H *WOM»y?

-------
                    p
Global warm!
              EMS
It can be many different
things -

A Motto
An Ideal
A Way to do Business
A Way to Live Your Life
A Call to Action

-------
   Sustainability - Wh
  The term "SUSTAINABILITY" is often misunderstood and
  misused...

  Not everyone agrees on a definition -

  In 1 997, there were an estimated 350 plus definitions of
  'sustainability' and 'sustainable development'

  The most popular recent definition is traced from the
    Brundtland Commission, 1987:

   "meeting the needs of the present generation without
      compromising the ability of future generations to
                  meet their own needs."
asa

-------
Sustainability
does it Mea


-------
  Sustainability
does it Mea


   For ASA...
          Living and working like we plan to
              stay here for generations!
asa

-------
5 Our Purpose:
  To produce
  clean, safe
  waiter &   Our 9°a'
  exceptional
  quality
  ..    ...
  biosohds
To provide
sanitation
services to a
growing
population  Sustainability
decreasing
natural
resources.
asa

-------

-------
Our Approach to the
      People
                        Product
                       or Service
aterials^W Business
         \ Process
                                      $
      Energy
                        Waste
                        Products
           Inputs = Outputs
                   Sustainable?

-------
Our Approach to th
  ASA Board anc
  Leadership Team [
                    Environment & People
                      The best of both!
asa

-------
Our Approach

  Tech Services
                           •sen Fields
                               trategic Resource
                               (location
Four Integrated Functional Divisions
who...
   Implement Strategic Plan
     Set Objectives
     Monitor Performance Metrics

-------

Define Business Elements
        o

Engineering
Operations
Maintenance
Environmental
Compliance
Management
Legal
Administration
Real Property
Audit
Human Resources
Public Outreach
Finance
IT
Purchasing
Board

-------
Our Approach to the
                                       SKI
Examples of Sust
        Hybrid vehicles
        Low flush toilets
        Energy efficient lighting
        Teleconference instead of travel
        Workforce succession planning
        Meet & exceed regulatory
        requirements
       > Asset management
       > Strategic Planning

-------
Our Approach to the
Why:

• Speak the same language
• Consistent understanding
• Have some fun - neuroscien
proves that you retain more..
• Motivates & involves everyor
• Everyone has an idea - who
knows what successful idea is
out there?

-------
Our Approach t
   What should
      ASA
    KEEP doing
    to be more
   sustainable?"
"What should
   ASA
START doing
 to be more
sustainable?
"What should
    ASA
 STOP doing
 to be more
sustainable?"
                 Carousel  Brainstor

-------
Green
Fields
Economic (PROFIT) Concepts:
      lie
     mrce
   location
  o Financial Advisor
  o New Revenue Sources
   > Asset Management
  o Green Fleet
  o Green Purchasing
     O environmentally preferable products
  o Reduce & Reuse First
  o Life Cycle Costing

-------
 Green
 Fields
Social (PEOPLE) concepts:
•: , ' •
      lie
      ce
    location
  o Succession Planning
   > Learning Culture
   3 Wellness Programs
  o Strategic Planning
  o Engagement Programs
  o Community Programs
  o Regional Training
  o"100 Year Leadership"
  o "Green Team" started

-------
Our Approach to t
 Cleai
  Services
Green
Fields
             isource
             location
Environmental (PLANET) Concepts:
       o Environmental Management Systems
       o Net Zero Energy Use
         Net Zero Chemical Use
        ; No Impact Construction
       o Water Reuse
       o Methane Capture and Reuse
       o Deammonification Research
       o Design for the Environment

-------
 Our Approach to the

         ASA Criteria for Project &  'rogram  Planning
 Weigh
asa
            People
             Ease of
            Operation
              Staff
           Engagement
            Weight:
Environmental
 Leadership
    Current
    Permit
  Compliance
   Flexibility to
    Adapt to
    Changing
   Regulations
                          Manage
                        Environment
                        al Footprint
 Efficiency
Community     Fiscal
Awareness   Responsibility
Reliability of
 System
Neighborhood/

City Relations
Capital Cost
Management
                        Weight: 5          t: 3     Weight:  10     Weight: 11
 Weight: 4
             Partnering
             Weight: 6
                Site Open
                 Space
                 Embed
               Sustainable
                practices
                                     Weight: 3
                         Weight: 11

-------
Our Approach to the
   Use Your Performance Metric System to Track
                   Progress:
  • Waste Reduction
  • Renewable Energy
  • Carbon Emissions
  • Water Usage and Reuse
  • Energy Use
  • Percent of Recycled Materials in products
  • Safety
  • Training, Development & Volunteer Hours
  • Hiring Practices/Employee Support
asa

-------
 Our Approach to

  Has Led to Success:

     • No net increase in O&M budget for last 3 years
     • 28% reduction in natural gas usage
     • 33% reduction in use of process chemicals in 3 years
     • 5 years of being accident free
     • Joint venture with City of Alexandria for Water
     Reclamation Program
     • 100% Preventive Maintenance completion record
asa

-------
What About tbs FLJ
tur

-------
At ASA, 'green  is j
                  urrbe FLJ
e begi
Developing a long term commitment to
sustainability that focuses on a 'systems'
based perspective
Every employee impacts our environmental
footprint and every employee contributes to
minimizing that same footprint

-------
  not just a plan or a project...
         Guides Executive
         Leadership Decisions
          Affects Maintenance &
          Repair/Replace
          Activities
      Influences Our Relationships
      with Our Board & Customers  »
                                       Guides Every Employee's
                                       Day to Day Decisions
        Touches Operations
        and Compliance
  Influences Our Relationships
:^ with Our Vendors, Suppliers
  & Consultants
asa

-------
The Journey Forward...for ASA:

• Hire a Sustainability Coordinator

•Continue to build sustainable
thinking into day to day through
the small sustainability steps take
to date

•Develop and monitor sound
performance metrics

•Be a sustainable utility leader
\-

-------
              at A
Future?
The Journey fo
because we can't dt

Revamp how we train our engineering
students; focus on systems approaches
rather than current silos of thinking

Vendors & consultants must rethink how
they do business and focus on
environmentally preferable products ani
projects

Fund research, not bail outs

The US must be advocates, not
adversaries, in sustaining our planet

-------
Thank You
        Karen Pallansch
        General Manager
        Alexandria Sanitation Authority
        karen.pallansch@alexsan.com

-------
Sustainability of Water Supply Systems, Wastewater Systems, and
           Wastewater / Storm Water Treatments
Current State and New Technologies for CSO
                 Control in Japan
                  Mr. Hideki Hay as hi
               Senior Research Engineer
 Japan Institute of Wastewater Engineering Technology (JIWET)

-------
 Current state and new technologies
       for CSO control in Japan
Japan Institute of Wastewater Engineering Technology
                 (JIWET)
              Hideki Hayashi

-------
 1. Introduction

191 cities all over Japan"
the combined sewer syst*
About 20% of the area covered
by the sewer system        0<
About 30% of the population
served by the sewer system
                                                    -Before 1944
                                                    -Byl944
                                                    -Byl954
                                                    -Byl964
                                                    -Byl974
                                                    -Byl984

-------
        Many oil balls washed ashore at Odaiba marine park
        in September 2000.
        Sunny day
Rainy day
Oil ball
• The incident made the headlines and became a public issue.
-> The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism set up
the Combined Sewer System Improvement Measures Review
Committee composed of experts, local governments and related
organizations.

-------
2. Current Status of CSO

700
600
- 500
"3
° 400
a
o
M 300
200
100
670
-
-

-


-
-
-















260















143











51
1 1
< 1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4
Intercepted rainfall sewage (mm/hr)









213












or more
    •BOD
    (maximum):
    1,310 mg/1

    • Coliform count
    (maximum):
    1,600,000/ml
                            • Natural outfalls: 2,420
                            • Pumping stations: 544
                            • Locations with less than 1 mm/hr
                            intercepted rainfall sewage: 670
Type of
facility
Sewage
plant
Pump
station
Storm
outfall
Water quality range
Primary
effluent
Untreated
sewage
Untreated
sewage
BOD 10 . 251 mg/1
SS 12 . 348 mg/1
COD 4.1 . 165 mg/1
BOD 3 . 330 mg/1
SS 3 . 160 mg/1
COD 11 . 8 10 mg/1
Coliform count 160 _ 500,000 /ml
BOD 5 . 1,3 10 mg/1
SS 7 . 445 mg/1
COD 11 . 1,440 mg/1
Coliform count 900 _ 1,600,000 /ml
Remark
Interception
rate:3times
ilntercepted
rainfall
sewage :0.7to4. 8
mm/hr
ilntercepted
rainfall
sewage:1.0to4.2
mm/hr

-------
3. Goals of the Combined Sewer System

Improvement

(1) Reduction in pollution loads
    The pollution load of the combined sewer system should be
  reduced to the same level as or lower than the pollution load
  expected to occur if the combined sewer system was replaced
  by the separate sewer system.
(2) Safety assurance of public sanitation
    The number of releases of untreated sewage should be at
  least halved for all outfalls.
(3) Removal of grit
    Outflow of grit should be minimized for all outfalls.

-------
  4. Tasks for Improvement
(1) Treatment of a large and varying amount of sewage is necessary.
(2) A large area is necessary for a stormwater reservoir for pollution
    control.
(3) Existing treatment plants cannot handle sewage even if additional
    intercepting sewers are installed.
• New techniques should be developed to address those tasks.
• Private corporations are commercializing new techniques.
• A framework for comprehensively evaluating techniques is necessary.

-> A new technological development project of experts, local
    governments and relevant organizations was launched: SPIRIT 21.

-------
5 .Framework to  new technological development
              SPIRIT Committee
Private companies
       Selection of technological development
        Public solicitation for participating
                 researchers
        Selection of participating researchers
                                            Private companies replying to the
                                                      offer
                                Joint research
     Examination of and advice on research
       Examination and technical evaluation of
                research results
             Reflection in measures
                                             Formulation of research plans
                                                Execution of research

-------
  6. Techniques Solicited from the Public and
  Development Targets
(1) Removal of grit
    The new technique should improve removal of grit by over 30%.
(2) Removal of pollutants
    The new technique should remove >30% of pollution in terms of
  BOD and SS.
(3) Disinfection
  • Coliform count <3,000 per ml
  • Reaction time and genetic toxicity equivalent to the existing
  technique
  • Affordable running cost
(4) Measurement and control
  • The new technique should be able to accurately and continuously
  measure water quality.

-------
T.List of CSO control technologies
Technology category
Debris Removal
(Screen)
High Rate Filtration
Coagulation /
Separation
Disinfection
Measurement /
Control
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Technology
Hydroclean Brush Screen
Rotamat RMK1 Screen
CSO Screen
Disc Screen
Storm Screen
Ultra Fine Screen using perforated panel with tapered holes
The Copa Raked Bar Screen
Rotary Screen
Wet-weather high-speed wastewater filtration system
High-Rate Filtration with a Synthetic Media
CDS Screen and the high-rate filtration method using specially-processed fibers of a material.
Super-High-Speed Fiber Filtration for Untreated Combined Sewage Water Overflow
on Rainy Days
High Rate Filtration Process
ACTIFLO PROCESS
High Rate Coagulation System using CDS Screen(FSS System)
Effective disinfection system with chlorine dioxide
CSO DISINFECTION SYSTEM BY MEDIUM-PRESSURE UV LAMPS
Rapid Disinfection of Combined Sewer Overflow using Chlorine Dioxide
Rapid Disinfection Technique Using High Concentration Ozone for Combined Sewer
Overflow
BCDMH Disinfection
The economical ozone disinfection system by using ozone adsorbing technology
Ultraviolet disinfection system
Organic pollutant monitor(UV meter)
Automatic coliform counter

-------
  (1) Removal of impurities
) Pry
weather
 HWL
 LWL
            Overflow
              weir
   Inflow Pipe and
   Interceptor side
                        M
                         Baffle Plate
                      Discharge Pipe side
                                      Inflow Pipe and
                                      Interceptor side
                                                       Discharge Pipe side
                          Rotamat RMK1 Screen

-------
100
^ 90
80
.« 70
£60
1 50
1 4°
^H
^ 30
13
g 20
1 10
0
(
Results of exreiment
^








i
) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0
amount of overflow m3/sec
4

-------
(2) Removal of pollutants
    :High-speed filtering technique
          Existing public works structure
                                   Special filter media
            Wet-weather high-speed waste water
                    filtration system

-------


1

•
ft

1



QA
50
sP'TA
o\70
Q
O/-A
60
PQ
i
•>_ CA
& 50
c
 o A i
,— , -30
<3
l^ on
§ ^0
s

-------
(3) Removal of pollutants
     :Coagulation and separation technique
         Polymer
                  Micro-sand  collect
                  device
 Raw water
                                           Sludge
                                           discharge
                                           pump
                                                        Effluent
                                                        water
         coagulant
pH adjusting
ckmicnl
         Screening
         chamber
                Rapid   Injection
                mixin   chamber
                chamber
                     Maturation
                     chamber
lamellar
settler
          Raw water conveying pump
                      ACTIFLO PROCESS
                                           Recirculation
                                           pump

-------
oval efficiency
e
 100
 90
I 80
 70
 60
 50
 40
 30
 20
 10
  0
0
      Results of exreiment
+  SS
A  COD
X  T-P
                                • BOD
                                X T-N
                                  Targe(SS,BOD)
           A
                        X
                                 A
           X
                      X X
  10
                       20
                       rainfall
    30
(mm)
40
50

-------
(4) Disinfection technique
        C1O2 generator
                                   Chemical storage facility
                                       Special NaClO2
                                           tank  HC1 tank
                                                         Scrubber
Dilution water supply system
                                              O
                                                    Strainer
                                 Grit chamber
         Effective disinfection system with chlorine dioxide

-------

RUN
Rainfall(mm)
Reaction time(min)
Coliform
group
Influent
after
disinfection
1
96.5
5
1,300-
310,000
25-
2,600
2
15
5
160,000-
370,000
460-
3,000
3
15
5
96,000-
260,000
75-
2,150
4
19.5
5
110,000-
240,000
185-
2,420

-------
(5) Measurement and control technique
         air pump
            converter
recorder
                                              detector
Visible light signal
amplifier


i
L i
L

uv-s£
detector '
VIS-S
detector
nl N

UV signal amplif



[correction filte:
•\

Built-in cleaning
mechanism
/

s~
±
t
X.
J
-\

k
^VIS-R
1 detector
,|h
UV-R detectc
c
                                              \
measurement sidey \ /^\jeference
              .7 ^
             air outlet
        parallel cell windows
                                                  exterior
                                                  cleaning
                                                 mechanisn
               Organic pollutant monitor (UV meter)

-------
200
^ 150
J3 100
03
^ 50
0
(
COD
y=0.95x
R2 = 0.94
^
* tfK»
S
\


) 50 100 150 200
analysis value(mg/l)
500
400
^
bC
^,300
 200
C/5
H H
>
100
0
(
ss
y=1.06x /
R2 = 0.9 !/ *
*x"^
** ^x*
• >*
* >*
**x^
• v4* *
J^*
*«
X
* * *
ii

) 100 200 300 400 500
analysis value(mg/l)

-------
 8. Conclusion
New techniques for combined sewage systems have been
 developed.
Improvement measurement programs are being reviewed
 at many cities to incorporate the new techniques in
 practice.
For details of each technique, please visit:
               http ://www.j iwet. or .j p/

-------
"Water Safety Plan" Approach

-------
              "Water Safety Plan" Approach
Recent Progress in WSP Application in Japan
                 Dr. Shoichi Kunikane
       Professor, Institute for Environmental Sciences
                 University ofShizuoka

-------
     Recent progress in
 WSP application in  Japan
US-Japan Governmental Conference
    2-5 March 2009, Las Vegas
         Shoichi Kunikane
  Institute for Environmental Sciences
       University of Shizuoka
             Japan

-------
 WSP application in the world

IWA website: WSPortal
"Bonn Charter" (IWA, 2004)
Incorporation in the regulatory framework
in New Zealand
 >As Public Health Risk Management Plan
Under discussions in EL)
WSP development in UK companies
Application in many developing countries

-------
          "Guidelines for
       WSP development"

Issued by MHLW in May 2008
 >Not as a regulation but as a recommendation
Drafted by a JWWA committee
Small/Medium water suppliers as main target
audience
Reference to New Zealand's approach
Hazard identification utilizing water quality
monitoring data

-------
              Annexes of
"Guidelines for WSP development"

> Computer software with pull-down menus and
 templates (in Japanese)
  > A WSP format (Word file)
  > A file for hazard analysis (Excel file)
» Examples of WSP development case studies for
 small water supplies (in Japanese)
  > Rapid sand filtration system
  > Slow sand filtration system
  > Disinfection only (two cases)

-------
Procedure of hazard  analysis
Start
Prepare a risk level matrix
                   1
 Select potential hazardous events along with
 each step of water supply from source to tap
       Prepare a hazard control sheet
 A table on control measures, a monitoring method and
       a control limit for each hazardous event
 relating it with its risk level and water quality parameters
    Rearrange the above table according to
        each water quality parameter
                                 End

-------
          WSP application
in Tokyo Metropolitan Water Supply

In FY2006
  • Development of a WSP for one water
    treatment plant (Misato WTP)
In FY2007
  • Practical application of a WSP to Misato WTP
  • Development of WSPs for the whole system,
    including 71 WTPs
In FY2008
  • Practical application of WSPs to the whole
    system

-------
       "Tokyo High Quality

  Water Management Program"

WSPs for the whole system
 >incl. 71 water treatment plants/stations and
  distribution network
ISO 9001
 >for quality management at water treatment
  plants
ISO/IEC 17025
 >for analytical quality control at a water quality
  examination laboratory

-------
        Water Sources of
Tokyo Metropolitan Water Supply
                          Dam (completed)
                         t> Dam (under construction)

-------
Purification plants and stations of
Tokyo Metropolitan Water Supply
                               Misato P.P.
                                 D
                                     P.P.
ashimurayama P

      Ozaku
    71 purification
    plants/stations

-------
Purification plants and stations of
Tokyo Metropolitan Water Supply
Source type
Surface water
Groundwater
with direct
influence of
surface water
Groundwater
Total
Treatment method
Rapid
sand
filtration
8
3
1
12
Slow
sand
filtration
1
3
-
4
Membrane
filtration
2
5
1
8
Disinfection
only
-
-
47
47

-------
     Reference chart of risk levels
              (Tokyo MWS1
Frequency of occurrence
Once a week or more
                           Degree of impact
f  Control criteria   Quality standard
                          Below
         Above Below i Above
Not more than once a week
but once a month or more
   1
Not more than once a month
but once a year or more
   1
Not more than once a year
   1

-------
  Control measures according to
       risk levels (Tokyo MWS)
Risk             ~  ,  ,
.   .             Control response measures
level                      r
       Water intake, transmission/distribution or supply
       shall be suspended, in principle.
       Control shall be stepped up. In addition, permanent
       measures such as facilities improvements shall be
       considered.
       Control shall be stepped up.
       Normal control shall be continued. In addition,
       permanent measures such as facilities
       improvements shall be considered.
 1
Normal control shall be continued.

-------
 A comprehensive water safety
 management program in Osaka
        City Water Supply

WSP
ISO 9001
 >for quality management in water treatment
  plants (already obtained) and water
  distribution network (to be obtained)
ISO 22000
 >for water safety management (to be obtained)

-------
               WSP  application
       in Osaka City Water Supply
Documentation
Hazards


Control
measures
Management
plan


Supporting
programs


Verification
              Source
        Treatment   Distribution
Emergency response manual, etc.
     Water quality testing
                                                   	i
















c
Q)

^•~
^<
O
o
3
(/)
0
3
03
^^
^
Q)
«— i-
0
— \
(/)
O
c
o
0
«— i-
o'
3
Hazarc













i identification
1



7n
O
CD
0
O
-^



H
— \
0
Q)
«— i-
0
3
«— i-
o
Q)
3
«—i-
(/)

















?75
O
CD
0
O
-^ '






c7)
«— i-
^^
a1
c
<— t-
^^
__>
CO
<
CD
\/»
«— i-
0
3
)













                              Public
                             relations
                            customers
                                           Accountability

-------
       WSP application in
     Kobe City Water Supply

A WSP for the whole system
 >Under development
A WSP for Sengari Water Treatment Plant
 > Already developed, but being revised and
  incorporated in the above

-------
          Conclusions

WSP is essential for ensuring drinking
water safety.
Hazard identification is a key of WSP.
It is expected that WSP will be widely
applied in water supplies, especially small
ones.

-------
        Acknowledgement

The author thanks Tokyo, Osaka and Kobe
Water Supplies for their kind offer of
information on their WSP application.

-------
                  Day 3
               Proceedings of
     JAPAN - UNITED STATES JOINT
   CONFERENCE ON DRINKING WATER
      QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND
        WASTEWATER CONTROL
                March 2009
Sponsored by:
3-EPA
             WATE
              FOUNDATION	
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency
             XWERF
             Water Environment Research Foundation
             Collaboration. Innovation. Results.
    WATER
    RESEARCH
    FOUNDATION"
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE: OF WATER*

-------
Water Reuse/ Indirect Potable Reuse

-------
          Water Reuse/ Indirect Potable Reuse
            Water Reuse in Japan
             Mr. Mizuhiko Minamiyama
   Head, Wastewater and Sludge Management Division
          Water Quality Control Department
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

-------
ater Reuse in Japan
National Institute for Land and Ir
          '™  Hokkaido University
             Infrastructure Management
            \
             I M

-------
                    Outline
     Current status / future trend of water reuse
     in Japan
f
   • New roles of reclaimed water
     - Stable water supply in disaster by dual pipe
       system (tap & reclaimed water)
     - Heat island mitigation: Road sprinkling with
       water-retentive pavement.
     - Enhancement of environment:
       Restoring urban streams ("seseragi")

-------
     Current Status of Water Reuse in
                          ^    '
     ow recycle ratio of municipal wastewater:
      0.7 % of Municipal & Industrial Water
     >1.4 % of treated municipal wastewater
            f^Sr^         (2°°6)
           s*
    High recycle ratio of industrial water:
     >79
f
(2006)

-------
      Trend of Number of Treatment
  Plants Reusing  Treated Wastewater
500
450
| 400
| 350
"co
e soo
CD
| 250
o
1 200
° 150
CD
E 100
 50
 0
     2000
             2001
2003     2004
   year
2005
2006
                                           • Industrial Water supply
                                           • Industrial Water Works
                                           D Aggricultural Irrigation
                                           • Construction site cleaning
                                           D Roadside trees Irrigation
                                           • Snow Melting
                                           D River flow sustaining
                                           D Recreational Impoumdment
                                           • Landscape Irrigation
                                           D Toilet Flushing

-------
             Usage of Reclaimed Water
                   Industrial
                  Water Works
                    1.4%
            Aggricultural
              Irrigation
               6%
                                Toilet Flushing
                                   3.5%
f
 Industrial
Water supply
   8.8%
                                Quantity of
                                Recycled
                                Municipal
                              Wastewater in
                               Japan (2006)
      River flow
      sustaining
       32.5%
 :ecreational
Impoumdment
  2.7%

-------
Water Quality and Facility Standards for
   Treated Wastewater Reuse (2005)

E. Coli
Turbidity
PH
Appearance
Chromaticity
Odor
Residual
Chlorine
Treatment
Level
Where are
Standards
Applied?
Exit of
treatment
facility
for reuse
Responsibility
demarcation
point

Flushing Water
ND(in 100ml)
(Control target)
2
5.8-8.6
Shall not be
unpleasant
-
Shall not be
unpleasant
(Control target)
free 0.1mg/l
combined 0.4mg/l
Sand Filtration
Sprinkling Water
ND(in 100ml)
(Control target)
2
5.8-8.6
Shall not be
unpleasant
-
Shall not be
unpleasant
(Control target)
free 0.1mg/l
combined 0.4mg/l
Sand Filtration
Water for
Landscape Use
Refer to remarks1'
(Control target)
2
5.8-8.6
Shall not be
unpleasant
40 degree
Shall not be
unpleasant
Refer to remarks 2)
Sand Filtration
Water for
Recreational Use
ND(in 100ml)
2
5.8-8.6
Shall not be
unpleasant
10 degree
Shall not be
unpleasant
(Control target)
free 0.1mg/l
combined 0.4mg/l
Coagulation &
Sand Filtration
1)The present standard (coliform groupes count: 1000 CPU /100ml) is adopted pro tempore.
2)This value shall not be stipulated as treatment other than chlorine disinfection is carried out case by case
from ecological correctness and as the water may be used according to the prerequisite that humans shall not
touch it.

-------
                                 ,
       Future Trend of Water Reuse
    Quantity for reclaimed water could be
    lower due to the population decrease.
f
Roles of reclaimed water are expanding
       -; wl mw
- Stable water supply in disaster

  (e.g., earthquake)

- Heat island mitigation
       •
- Needs for creating / restoring streams to

< enhance environment

-------
           New Roles
         Reclaimed Water

Stable water supply in disaster:
Dual water supply system (tap & reclaimed
water) Jf
    JJJ^F*^* M
Heat island mitigation: Road sprinkling
with water-retentive pavement.
Enhancement of environment:
Restoring urban streams ("seseragi")

-------
                         A
      Stable Water Supply in Disaster

        by Dual Water Supply System

              W^     ffr
   Reclaimed water is supplied for nonpotable

   use (e.g., toilet flushing) through dual water

    ipes in urban areas.*.
  • Even if tap water system was down in
   \          71
   disaster (e.g., earthquake),

   r-Toilet could work using reclaimed water.

   - Drinking water could be supplied by setting

• ~  temporary reverse osmosis (RO) treatment

W '  'System.

-------
       Onsite recycling system
POTW
POTW
         Toilet
                              Tap water
                   Onsite treatment
                   system	
           Toilet
                                 water
                   Onsite treatment
                   system	
If tap water system was down,
drinking and toilet-flushing water
could not be supplied.
                                           K
                                        Municipal reclaimed water supply system
                                                Toilet
                                        POTW
                                                  Toilet
                                         POTW
                                                               -x
 Tap water is used
 for toilet flushing
 if reclaimed water
l^was down.
                                                                       Tap water
    Reclaimed
    water
                                                                       Tap water

                                                                       Reclaimed
                                                                       water
                                       Even if either drinking or reclaimed water
                                       supply system was down, another water
                                       system could work.

-------
       Heat Island Mitigation:
Road Sprinkling with Water Retentive
               Pavement
"Heat island": Urban airlL
and surface temperatures
are higher than nearby rural
areas|P   ^-JlP
       > '<_,,
Reclaimed wastewater is
used for sprinkling roads
to mitigate heat island in
urban areas.

                             Water retentive pavement
                                     Not sprinkled
                                      Sprinklingwitf|i
                                      reclaim
                             Water retentive pavement
                                     Sprinkled

-------
. „, Photo 1.  View of a Road Surface Sprinkled with
    Treated Wastewater ("Shio Site", Tokyo)

-------
    Effect of Road Sprinkling with

            Reclaimed Water
Sprinkling reclaimed wastewater decreased the road
surface temperature by 8 degrees during the daytime and
by 3 degrees at night: temperatures equal to those on
planting zones.
!C, 1 & 1 QD SC HOTM 03WiS3f
lis&ca

ooao


-------
      Enhancement of Environment:
                        V|
     Restoring Urban Streams (Seseragi)
  Need for creating /
  restoring streams
  to enhance
  environment in
  urban areas
r

f
  Increase of creating
  artificial streams
  using reclaimed
  water     /

-------
       Benefit and Cost
to Create Artificial Streams
  Using Reclaimed Water
Benefits
  Ecological
habitats (firefly)
                       Cost factor
                  •Advanced treatment
                    •De-chlorination
Hygienic safety
                   Disinfection to allow
                     body contact
   andscape
                  Maintenance of green
                      and stream
 Environmental
  Education
           A	( 'Providing opportunity
           N—1  to
learn environment

-------
f
                           ^^k
     Evaluation of Multiple Benefits of
              Artificial Streams

      To evaluate multiple benefits of artificial
 I
i
         streams ("seseragi") irrigated with
                 reclaimed water.
    Conjoint analysis was used to evaluate
      willingness-to-pay (WTP) for each
      attribute of the benefits (ecological
   habitats, hygienic safety, landscape and
    environmental education) of artificial
            streams ("seseragi").

-------
           Case Study

Artificial streams ("seseragi") irrigated with
reclaimed water in Tadotsu Town, Japan
                       Artificial stream
                 "Yawata-no-mori Hotaru-no-sato"

-------
      Multiple Benefits of Artificial
        Streams  in Tadotsu Town
              •Habitats for firefly was restored using tertiary-
              treated and dechlorinated wastewater.
              •Firefly is regarded as a symbol of "clean water"
  Hygienic
   safety
 Landscape
•Contact to w
disinfection.
                         ater is

allowed due to appropriate
  andscape was enhanced.
Environment
al Education

•Opportunity for environmental education
(firefly-watching, environment-learning seminar)
was provided.

-------
    Questionnaire Survey
             Zentsuji City |RailwayNf ''\

                        igh^ay
      Total households in study area:

      ,    13,588 households
      I
     •
  Distribution:     	^       Recovery :
1,000 households
                II
302 households

-------
         Result of Benefit Evaluation
                      Marginal Willingness To Pay : MWTP (yen/household/year)
0
1,000
2,000
3,
                                           000
                                                      4,000
5,000
   Restoring ecological
      habitats
Securing hygienic safet
                                                            4,419
     •nhancing landscape

  Providing opportunity for
  environmental education
                                1,375

                                                      4,094
                         918

   III
   p
           Benefit (Sum): 10,806 yen ($113) /household/year
r
               Numbers of surveyed households :  13,588 households
           Total benefit of "Yawata-no Mori Hotaru-no Sato":
                              About 150 million yen ($ 1.6 million )/year

-------
                 Conclus
Quantity of reclaimed wat
 > Low recycle ratio of municipal^astewater (1.4%)
 > Quantity for reclaimed water could be lower due to the
   population decrease in the future.
  xpanding usages of reclaimed water is needed to
promote water reuse.
           /   ^A          •
 - Landscape irrigation, river flow sustaining, snow melting,
   industrial, agricultural irrigation, nonpotable water use
   (toilet flushing), etc.
 - Roles  of reclaimed water are expanding.
    • Stable water supply in disaster (e.g., earthquake)
    • Heat island mitigation
 ^  * Needs for creating / restoring streams to enhance environment

-------
Thank you very much for your
           ention.

-------
            Water Reuse/ Indirect Potable Reuse
Current Status, Trends, and Future Challenges of
        Water Reuse in the United States
                   Mr. Wade Miller
                   Executive Director
           WateReuse Association and Foundation

-------
    Current Status, Trends, and Future
 Challenges of Water Reuse in the U.S.
                 Presented at:
Japan-U.S. Joint Conference on Drinking Water Quality
       Mar aaement and Wastewater Control
         •HI?1.
Las Vegas, NV
March 4, 2009
                 Presented by:
                  Wade Miller
               Executive Director
             WateReuse Association
                     and
             WateReuse Foundation

-------
              Topics
 ome Basic Facts
Overview of Water Reuse in the U.S.
   Current Extent of Use and Potential
   Trends and Driving Forces
 - Technology, Applications, Benefits, Costs,
   Regulations
Issues and Challenges
The Future
Conclusions

-------
upply & Demand
            Population &
              Demand

                   Available Water
              Time

-------
o
f
                                              Stress  \n  2-Q2.Q
             \AVik r ;Av, .l
                                                            IK
     Water Abundant

     W£er Concerns
         Scarce

     Wal;er Crisis


     Sparsely Populatec
artment of the Interior
tau of Rec tarn at ion
snce and Technology Program

                                                         UnitodSlates Fittor Corporsticn, l9@§

-------
U.S.  Drought  Monitor
     D1(A,H)

     D2(A,H)
    DO .Abnormally Dry
    D1 Drought—Moderate
    D2 Drought—Severe
    D3 Drought—Extreme
    D4 Drought—Exceptional
Drought Impact Types:
A= Agricultural (crops, pastures.
  grasslands)
H= Hydro logical (water)
Ho type = both impact
  Delineates dominant impacts
  The D roug ht Monitor focuses o n broad- scale con dition s.
  Local conditions may vary. See accompanying text summary
  for forecast state me nte.
           imp: //droug ht.u nl. ed u/d in
USDA ^m. f$:\
              x35*^
                    Released Thursday, August 7, 2003
                     Author: DottglasLeComte,NOAA/CPC

-------
U.S. Drought Monitor
                                                  November 11, 2008
                                                        Valid 8 am EST
	              Drought Impact Types;
   DO Abnormally Dry      r-' Delineates dorninaniim pacts
   D1 Drought - Moderate   A = Agricultural (crops, pastures,
                               grasslands)
                    H = Hydrological (water)
   D2 Drought -
   D3 Drought - Extreme
   D4 Drought • Exceptional
Tfte Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scats conditions.
Local conditions may vary. See accompanying text summary
for forecast s/ateiTWffte.
                                         USDA
                                                 :-.'< I
                                                ririnr.nT DtimjM MRi^iUen
   httD"//droLidht llnI edlU/dm
      Released Thursday, November 13, 2008
Author: Mark Svoboda. National Drought Mitigation

-------
      Some Basic Facts
     ater i
 There is Substantial Unplanned Reuse (e.g., the
Mississippi River, Thames, Rhine, Seine, etc.)
Water is a Manufactured Product
"Purity" of Water Should be Matched to its
Intended Use
History of Water is of Little Importance
In Planned Water Reuse, we Emulate "Mother
Nature" - With Technology, can do it better and
faster
Water reuse is "green" and "eco-friendly"

-------
Factors Driving Water Reuse
     (and Desalination)
 i HI?
-Population growth
-Increased municipal, industrial, and
 agricultural demand
-Dependence on single source of supply
-TMDLs/Nutrient load caps
       "Water scarcity"

-------
Significant Trends in Water Reuse
       .onwiae Droughts Lead to New Paradigm
    Water Scarcity
    Reuse is Gaining in Prominence Around the
    Globe (e.g., Australia, Singapore, South
    Africa, Israel, Spain, Belgium)
   • Potable Reuse Being Discussed as Possibility
   • Research Focus is Now Global
   • Climate Change ~ It's Mostly About Water
   • Public Acceptance Continues as Most Vexing
    Challenge: Brisbane is Latest Example

-------
 Relevant D
            niulus Legislation for Title XVI
Projects
Australia Launching Reuse Projects in Every
Major City
Singapore PUB's NEWater Facility a Showcase
Water Reuse is in Vogue: "Green" and "Eco-
Friendly
Thames Water, Antwerp Engaged in Indirect
Potable Reuse

-------
What is Possible with Water
              Reuse?
 	 	/ Anything Given
Current Technology
With MF/RO/UV/AOP, Can Produce
Water that is Virtually Pure Dihydrogen
Monoxide
Problem is that Technology has
Surpassed our Ability to Communicate
Effectively with Public

Need to Resolve Issues with
EDCs/PPCPs

-------
 Potential for Water Reuse
 ipproximately
5-6% of
municipal
waste water
effluent in the
U.S. is
reclaimed and
beneficially
reused
                   bout 34.9 bgd Municipal Effluent in the U.S.
5-6% Reclaimed

-------
    ion of Water Reuse
levels through 2015
                         2.70
    2.02
        2,12
           2.22
              2.33
                  2.45
                     2.57
 2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015

-------
                water  Reuse Occurs in  Four States
 Washington

—•*-^-


Oregon
                      Montana
             Idaho
                       Wyoming
      Nevada
                 Utah
                                 North Dakota
                                 South Dakota
                                   Nebraska
                                           , Minnesotaf
California
                         Colorado
             Arizona
                      New Mexico
.Wisconsin,
         .Michigan
                                               Iowa
                                          X
                                                      Illinois
                          Vermont
    New York
   ——A

Pennsylvania
                                                                                    Maine
                                                                                  New Hampshire
                                                                                 ^, Massachusetts
                                                                                 1 Rhode Island
                                                                                'Connecticut
                                                           Indiana!
                                                                 Ohio
                                                                              New Jersey

                                                                             Delaware
                                      Kansas
                                       Oklahoma
                 /West,
                 'Virgin/
                                                Missouri
                                                             Kentucky
                                                            _	•

                                                          Tennessee
                                             Arkansas
                                                      Mississippi
                                                [Louisiana*
                                                                     Virginia*
                      North
                     Carolina
                     V	N
                    South
                   .Carolina
                                                           Alabama) Georgia
                                                                       Florida

-------
      ...but  it  is  growing   in  other  states
    Washington




   Oregon
Montana
            Idaho
                     Wyoming
      Nevada
           North Dakota
                               South Dakota
                                 Nebraska
                    .Minnesota I
                                               .Wisconsin
                Utah
California
                        Colorado
            Arizona
                     New Mexico
                                   .Michigan
Vermont
                                                 New York
                                                          Maine
        New Hampshire

        k , Massachusetts

        Rhode Island
      'Connecticut
                                            Iowa
                                                                   Pennsylvania

                                                  Illinois
                                                       Indiana!
                                                             Ohio
                                    Kansas
                                     Oklahoma
                                           /West.
                                           * Virginij!
    , New Jersey

   Delaware
  t Maryland
                                             Missouri
                                                         Kentucky


                                                      Tennessee
                                               Virginia'
                                               North
                                               Carolina
                                             Arkansas
                                                  Mississippi
                                              [Louisiana,
                                              South
                                             Carolina
                                                       Alabama) Georgia

-------
Best Available Technology
 Membranes are the technology of choice
 around the world today as the "best available
 technology" for water purification.
       Singapore, Japan, China, Australia, Spain
      K Orange County, California
      K Tampa Bay, Florida
      K Trinidad & Tobago, Wl

-------
 Reverse Osmosis Costs
      15
$/l,OOOgal.
    5.50
           1950  1960 1970 1980 1990  2000
                      AWWARF Study, 2001

-------
                              (OCWD and OCSD)
                                  itment Flow Diagram
Enhanced
 Source
 Control
Secondary
Treatment
               86 mgd

             Microfiltration
  70 mgd
 Reverse
 Osmosis
   (RO)
 70 mgd

Ultraviolet
  Light
  (AOP)
                                                             Purified
                                                              Water
Secondary
 Effluent
              Backwash
             OCSD Plant 1
   Brine
OCSD Outfall
                                               with hydrogen
                                                 peroxide
                                 Natural soil
                                  filtration

-------
 asm  water  Recycling Plant
    Conventional Process
Flocculatioi
  Basin
                         Disinfection
 Membrane 1
To Distribution
  30 mgd
                                To Sea Water Barrier
                                   5.0 mgd


                                To Sea Water Barrier
                                   2.5 mgd
                              To Chevron
                               Boiler Feed
                                5.0 mgd

-------
                pplications
               ion
Agricultural Irrigation (Edible & Non-Edible Crops)
Industrial and Commercial
Environmental Uses
Non-Potable Urban Uses (Urinal Flushing in High
Rise Buildings)
Ground water Recharge
Potable Water Supply Augmentation

-------
Locally Controlled
Environmentally Friendly
Low or No Capital Costs
Augments Existing Supplies

-------
                       d Criteria
                  rtions
28 States Have Water Reuse Regulations

2004 U.S.  EPA Guidelines for Water Reuse:
 - Recommended treatment processes
 - Water quality limits
 - Monitoring frequencies
 - Setback distances
 - Other controls
www.eDa.aov/ORD/NRMRL/Dubs/625r04108/625r04108.htm

-------
          in  Water Reuse
   >lic Acceptance
 jnknowns about Chemical Risks
Poor Differentiation by Public and Politicians of
Planned vs. Unplanned Reuse
The Media
Lack of Political Support
More Cost-Effective Technologies
Funding
Better Understanding of Economics
Energy/Water Nexus
Climate Change

-------
Public Acceptance of Water Reuse
    Public generally strongly supports nonpotable uses
    Uses involving no or minimal contact with
    reclaimed water (e.g., irrigation) are favored
    Acceptance related to knowledge of reuse (e.g.,
    public education and participation programs)
    Acceptance of indirect potable reuse has been
    problematic in recent years
    Proposed projects in San Diego, East Valley, Dublin
    San Ramon, and Tampa have been unsuccessful

-------
Information Most Relevant to Help
     "   "3r Reuse Applications
   . "md a Way to Assure the Public that
   Reclaimed Water is Safe from Medical
   Wastes, etc.
  i Find a Way to Convince the Public that All
   Water is Reused and that an Environmental
   Barrier is Unnecessary Given Efficacy of
   Technologies
   Convince the Public that Water Technologies
   are as Safe as Those Used in Elevators, 747s,
   etc.

-------
          The  Future
	;ct Potable Reuse is Inevitable
Increased Desalination - both Brackish
Groundwater and Seawater - Also is Inevitable
Education & Outreach/Stakeholder Involvement
is Key to Acceptance of Water Reuse
Public Should Not Hold Water Reuse to Higher
Standard than Drinking Water
Efficacy of Technology is Not an Issue
Concerns About EDCs/PPCPs Must be Addressed
Research is Key Component

-------
Than
   Wade Miller
   Executive Director
   WateReuse Association & Foundation
   703-548-0880
   wmiller@watereuse.org

-------
            Water Reuse/ Indirect Potable Reuse
Source Water Protection of Yodo River and Water
    Quality Management in Osaka Municipal
                   Waterworks
                  Mr. Masayuki Miwa
              Manager in Charge of Research
              Water Examination Laboratory
            Osaka Municipal Waterworks Bureau

-------
Source Water Protection
      of Yodo River
        ^Quality Management
       Municipal Waterworks

         Masayuki MIWA

         Manager in Charge of Research
         Water Examination Laboratory
         Osaka Municipal Waterworks Bureau
         (OMWB)
               Japan-U.S. Joint Conference
        On Drinking Water Quality Management
                  and Wastewater Control

-------
Lake Biwa and
  Yodo River
    System
Kyoto City
                     Yodo River
      Japan
    (Kansai area)
                          Osaka

-------
Lake Biwa & Yodo
River System *•*
        •* ^

                    yoip rrei,
               tsura R.

               Yod

 rl
            »
            f
          isaka City
 Catchment area
 Km2

Nara Pi
     Air Port,

-------
                      Population living in
   9.0

   6.0

   3.0
 (Million
 parsons)

   3.0

   6.0

   9.0

   12.0
Yodo River basin
caicnmenis area
Osaka Arakawa River basin







s~




\*



\




J





Tokyo
3.5
7.2

Kiso River basin
Nagoya




Population
water supi
downstrea

1.8
6.1



i served by
Dly in
m area

     ~^^^^^^^m
  Population Distribution in River
Water Basin in Three Metropolitan
         Districts of Japan

-------
                                         Lake Biwa
rater flow rate
(172m3/sec)
                Katsura River
                                 }iver
                                         Seta River
                                 Kizu River
                  Toyorio
            Niwakubfo
Effluent amount of sewerage
and human waste treatment
     plants (18m3/sec)
                .ewerage treatment plant
                Monitoring point
                Intake point for water supply

-------
Transition in the Quality of Raw
    .&     Water Taken
at Kuniji
   f    *.  ^^^
                 Purification Plant
                 feter Pollution Control Law
KMnO4 consumption (mg/L)
      — KMnO4 consumption
        Bacteria count
                            Bacteria count (cfu/mL)

                                   200000
                                     150000
                                     100000
                                     50000
   1900  10
                                  Year
                         *..-*?

-------
National  Policy and Overall Coordination
 on Conservation of Water Environment
    Ministry of the Environment
    Conservation of Water Quality in Public
     Water Resources
     - Environmental Quality Standards
     - Factory Effluent Control
     - Household Waste Water Control
Ministry of Land,
 Infrastructure and Transport
Master Plans for River Environment
 Management
Diffusion of Sewerage System and
 Advanced Sewerage Treatment
               Measures for Conservation of Water Quality
    Ministry of Health, Labour and
     Welfare
    Execution of Preservation of Water
     Resource Quality for Water Supply
                              J
Ministry of Agriculture,
  Forestry and Fisheries
Conservation of Water Quality in Public
  Water Resources
  - Rural Community Sewerage
  - Conservation of Forest

-------
  Legislative System  on Conservation  of
Water Quality in Public Water Resources
    7958
   The Water Quality Control Law and the
   Factory Effluent Control Law j
               •j- 1970 The Environmental Quality Standards
                 1970 The Water Pollution Control Law
                   1971 The Effluent Standards
                               ncerning Special Measures for
                                  Preservation of Lake Water Qualit
      The Law Concerning Special Measures for The   I
      Prevention of Vj/ater Quality in Headwaters Areas fpr
      the Purpose of preventing Specific Trouble in the I
      Drinking WaterjSupply      j
                          1994
    1958
    Sewerage Law
  1970 Sewerage Law (Revision on Conservation of Water Quality)
          The Law!of Execution of Preservation Project
          of WateHResource for Water Supply     j
                           7994
    1960
! 1970
! 1980
! 1990
2000

-------
Diffusion of Sewerage Treatment
         in Kyoto City and
 BOD Change in Three Branches
        Kafsura
BOD(mg/L)
Kizu   • Sewerage

  Diffusion Rate of Sewerage
        - - • 100%


         • 80%
  i

      . .  - 60%
                              40%
    1965 1970  1975^-y 1980  1985 1990  1995

-------
  400 r
  300
  200
Q
§ 100
Original data series
Moving average
Trend
   0

    57  62  67  72  77  82  87  92  97  02  07
                   Year
    Change of BOD Load into
          the Yodo River

-------
05
05
O
  1000
   800
   600
•-  400
0
2
6
                Original data series
                Moving average
                Trend
-i  200
    0
     57  62 67 72  77  82  87 92 97  02  07
                   Year
 Change of Chloride Ion Load
       into the Yodo River

-------
 Measures for Conservation
        -A Case of OMW-

[1]  Lobbying Activity (Administrative
     Bodies)
  - To Promote Construction of P
     Water Treatment Plant
ublic Waste
         Including subsidizing for the source water
         conservation in Lake Biwa area
  - To Improve Effluent Water Qual
     Sewerage Treatment Plants
         Reduction of ammonia concentratio

-------
   easures for Conservation
      -A Case of OMWB-
[2]  Water Quality Monitoring in Water
    Sources
   Monthly Monitoring at Fixed Stations
    through the Yodo River
   Overall Parameters for Drinking Water
    Quality Control
   Report the Data to Public and the
    Administrative Bodies

-------
  1500 r
e 1000 -
Q

§  500
    0
     60
                Dyeing factory


                Brewery
                Year
  BOD Change of Industrial
           Effluents

-------
 Measures for Conservation
      -A Case of OMWB-

[3]  Regional Association on Water
    Quality Conservation
  - Participation in the Yodo River System
    Liaison Council for Prevention of Water
  - Participation in the Yodo River Water
    Quality Consultative Committee
    (YRWQCC)

-------
Water Utilities of YRWQCC
           Name
Osaka Municipal Waterworks
Osaka Prefectural Waterworks
Hanshin Water Supply Authority
Moriguchi City Waterworks
Hirakata City Waterworks
Neyagawa City Waterworks
Amagasaki City Waterworks
Suita City Waterworks
Nishinomiya City Waterworks
Itami City Waterworks
Water Supply Capacity (m ID)
        2,430,000
        2,330,000
        1,128,000
         103,500
         191,317
         129,000
         351,486
         208,000
         275,691
         94,600

-------
  30
05
  20
05
05
O 10
E
  0
Original data series
Moving avsrage
Trend
   57  62  67  72  77 82 87  92  97  02  07
                 Year
   Change of Ammonia Load
       into the Yodo River

-------
   Water Treatment Method in
    *           OMWB         "
KMnO4 consumption (mg/L,
                                 cteria count (cfu/mL)
       — KMnO4 consumption
         Bacteria count
                                           200000
                                           150000
                                           100000
                                           50000
1900 10
                                         Year
        Slow sand filtration

                        Rapid sand filtration

                      Advanced water treatment

-------
                     , Alum
           Coagulation Sedimentation
   Raw Water
                          aOH, Cl
  Mid
Ozonation
             Post
           Ozonation
G.A. C.
Finished
 Water
Advanced Water Treatment

-------
Measures for the Improvement
of Water Quality Management
             in OMWB
[2]  Risk assessment and management of
  the hazards
   Evaluating contaminant removal efficacy of
    AWT
   Hazard analysis in raw water
   Enhancement of raw water contaminant
    monitoring
        Bio-assay systems by monitoring fish activity and
                      .
                     •>rn
          nitrobacteria respiration

Introducing Water Safety Plan
      HACCP system and ISO 22000:2005

-------

Contaminant removal efficacy
           of AWT
Contaminant
Mutagenisity
i Pesticides (99 chemicals)
Endocrine disruptor
Pharmaceuticals
3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-
hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone (MX)
Removal
by AWT
Effective
#
Effective
Effective
Effective
Effective
Analytical method
Ames assay
(TA98, TA100)
GC/MS, LC/MS
Yeast two-hybrid assay,
LC/MS/MS, GC/MS
LC/MS/MS, GC/MS
LC/MS/MS
# also after disinfection

-------
Risk assessment procedure
  based on the PRTR* data
    Estimating the total daily volume of designated
         chemicals transferred in the basin
  As the components of waste in the upstream area of the Yodo River
   Estimating chemical concentration in downstream
       Total volume / daily downstream water flow rate (m3)
       Assessing the possibility of hazards to
              reach at intake point
        Based on the Drinking Water Quality Standards
            PRTR : Pollutant Release and Transfer Register

-------
  Outline of the WSP in  OMWB
  Hazard
  Control
 Measures
  Identification
 Monitoring and
    Operation
Management
    Pfan
 Supporting
 Programs
 Verification
               Water
               Source
             Treatment

                          Distribution
          Hazards Identification
-•-«
•(
• {
• f
»{
• !
• f
BS
• f
• f
• 4
• ?
• 5
• !
• f
• S
• «
   
   S O c

   <""o

                     HACCP
r	

          O-PRP
          	[
	
                                       |SO22000
      Walter Safety Management Plan
Public Relations,
  Complaints
                                        iCustomers
                 PRP
             »••«••
             ,**•	


Water Quality Management Plan (Examination)
                      _

 O-PRP: Operation Prerequisite Programs
 PRP: Prerequisite Programs (infrastructure, management, service, etc.)

-------
  Conservation of Drinking
         Water Sources
Water Quality Parameters
CD

E
CD
O

O
O
C/l
.ti
nS
'^
O

£
=3
^C
      •inistry of the Environment
nistry of Land, Infrastructure and Transp*
          1Z
                    Ministry of Health,

                    .abour and Welfare
       Desirable Drinking Water Quality

-------
pWat

    Safe
        pensive
      Whoever
 \

      Wherever
      Whenever
         \

-------
           Water Reuse/ Indirect Potable Reuse
Potable Reuse for Water Supply Sustainability:
     Critical Today - Essential Tomorrow
                Mr. Tom Richardson
                     Principal
             RMC Water and Environment

-------
Potable Reuse for Water Supply
           Sustainability
Critical Today, Essential Tomorrow!
                                    Presenter
                                   n, Principal
                          JC Water and Environment
                         .-


                                September 2008
   Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

-------
Topics
  What is Potable Reuse?
  Potable Reuse Drivers
  Potable Reuse Benefits
  Where is it Happening?
  What are the Lingering Barriers?
  How Do We Overcome These Barriers?

-------
                   -*^  *
    > • v1 7^919 • j
What is Potable Reuse?

-------
Introducing Recycled Water into the
Regional Groundwater Supply
   Tertiary Treatment Plant
        Advanced Treatment Plant
                                        Blend Water Supply
   Blend
   Water  I	S
  Recharge via
Spreading Basins
 Recharge via
Injection Wells

/- A
\
V
7
V
^

^Y
r
(6?
L

                                                Potable Uses
                 Groundwater

-------
Introducing Recycled Water into a Local
Surface Water
   Tertiary Treatment Plant
Advanced Treatment Plant
                  Lake / Reservoir
                  Augmentation
Local Runoff
                                                   Potable
                                                   Uses
                     Lake
             Potable Water
            Treatment Plant

-------
Advanced Treatment Helps to Secure
Regulatory and Public Support
  Recycled
   Water
Membrane
Filtration
Reverse
Osmosis
Replenishment
   Water
      Pathogens
      Pharmaceuticals
            WWTP
                                    Soil
                                   Aquifer
                                   Treatment

-------
                    -*^ *
    > • v1 7^919 • j
Potable Reuse Drivers

-------
  Global Water Challenges
                      Trend in global average surface temperature
                                                           urtHfi*KWHj
                       I	|	|	11111	11	|	111111111111111111111111111111111111 m 11  1

  1860  1870  1880   1890  1900  1910  1920  1930   1940  1950  1960  1970 1980  1990  2000
     PnsitivB deviation {in' C)     Negal.vs deviE-.cn (In "Cj


SCUTS; Stfool of enwlravnemij sd&nces, ctma'ic reaaBrc^ urtt Lfrvsral^ o3 East An^B, Nww«ti, uYilafl Wngdop, 1999,
                                                                IGIRHIDI

-------
     > ! V-
Local Water Supply Challenges
                                 Environment (Delta Smelt)
  2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
   Population Growth
                   Drought (Lake Mead)

-------
                     -*^ *
    > • v1 7^919 • j
Potable Reuse Benefits

-------
     > • v1 7^919 • j
Reliable Year-Round Supply Enables

Maximizing Beneficial Use of Effluent
  20
  15 -
O
o
  10 -
  5 -
Available Recycled Water
                 Typical RW (Irrigation) Demand
           i    i
   J    FMAMJ    JASOND

-------
Potable Reuse Uses Less Energy than Water
Importation
  6000
  50 DO
 O 4000
.o
 O
 ro
  3000
  2000 •-
  1000


    0
From The Role of Recycled Water in Energy
Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Reduction
(California Sustainability Alliance, 2008)

-------
 Advanced Treatment Provides Regional Salt
 Management Strategy
Water Importation Brings
  Additional Salt Load
 RO Removes Salt from
 Potable Reuse Systems
                              RO Provides Salt Export
                                    Pathway
                           Tons/Yr
                             Salt Load
                                       Salt Export
                           Urban Non-Potable Reuse
IPR

-------
 Potable Reuse Makes Economic Sense
           Comparison of Costs for Antelope Valley GWR
$14.0

$12.0

$10.0

 $8.0

 $6.0

 $4.0

 $2.0

 $0.0
WW Disposal
 Recycled
   Water
                         Imported
                          Water
                         Purchase
                        Contingency
Imported
 Water
           Incremental Cost
                       Avoided Cost

-------
                 -*^ *
> • v1 7^919 • j
   is it Happening

-------
Potable Reuse is  Global
 fc*=
  S33teds(e Water
Carraizk Atizcma USA
F Wtyno mil WaiiK
ResoLTte Cerflar Gwinneti
CcurV Gutrgia, USA
ffc
   , Englanu


Torretfe, Wulpen, Baltfum,

-------
         Groundwater

         Replenishment System
         A Pure Solution to Orange County's Water Needs
                         fv>^.
                         ^
A project jointly sponsored by:
     Orange County
  Water District (OCWD)
e^^
' v.
lit
                           -M< -J '
                           * . "•
         -and -
     Orange County
 Sanitation District (OCSD)
V

-------
 GWR System (OCWD and OCSD)
 Advanced Water Treatment Flow Diagram
Enhanced
 Source
 Control
  \
Secondary
Treatment
  1
 OCSD
Secondary
 Effluent
             86 mgd
            Backwash
           OCSD Plant 1
  70 mgd
  (HO)
70 mgd
 Llcjhi
 (AOP)
                          Purified
                           Water

                                        with hydrogen
                                         peroxide
                            Natural soil
                             filtration
  Brine
OCSD Outfall

-------
NEWater Production Process
                                       Reverse Osmosis


   Treated
  Used Water
            r
    NEWater
Microfiltration /
Ultrafiltration

       Ultra-Violet

-------
Western Corridor
Recycled Water
Project, Brisbane-
The "Multiple Barrier"
concept
AUD$2.4 Billion, due to be
completed October 2008.
                              Purified Recycled Water
                              Process Cycle
                                                         Blending of purified
                                                         recycled water into
                                                         Wiverthoe Dam
                                                             Barrier
                                                             Residential/industrial
                                                             source control
                                                        Barrier 2
                                                         istewater treatment plants -
                                                          ', GoodfB. Burvdambd.
                                                         :ol, Luspige Point and
                                                         ibson Island
                                  Luggage Point
                                  Gibson I stand

-------
AWA
                                                 'UATEK Pty. Ltd,
AUSTBALIAN
 WAtEB
ASSOCIATION
New Goreangab Water Reclamation Plant
             PAG (optional)
    Rojorvolr Water
   Q • 24,000 m»/d


   Secondary Effluent
            Pro OzonatJon
                            Coagulation    Flotation (DAF)
         Ultraflltratlon
                    GAG           BAG

                   Activated Carbon Filtration
    Dual Madia
    Filtration
Main Ozonation

                                                 AQUA SERVICES & ENGINEERING

-------
                  ^  ^tfTSL
     	     	    ^
    > v1 T^W^^T'^LV
                                  f
Lingering Challenges to Potable Reuse

-------
Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC)
Prompts Vigilance Among Regulators


 Pharmaceuticals lurking in U.S. drinking water
 AP probe found traces of meds in water supplies of 41 million Americans

-------
  Public Perception
                                              Sunday, April 16,2000
    San Fernando Valley
     CotwjoVflJffjy
   Antelope Viltey, Santa Oarlla
    Senda*. Burtomk

Humcn

|


Mostly sunny
Hiqhs: 69-73
lows; 5D-54
Baekol
Viewpoint
Online: www.clBllyiews.com
                     SUNDAY. APRIL 16. 2000
Tapping  toilet  water
  Wki
  you
* Would you IX!
ximtorteWe
Irlnking recycled
sewfif water?
  See below
Treated sewage to recharge underground aquifers
and Harrison Shcpprd
  i >am

  •• ,ige water Hushed by San I LT-
darido Vitl..
end up Itowiftg Irnm buccts
ihnmuhinn tin.-1 JIM Valley aiidmuch
"toilti       •• i,rl» IIA

 TliecoiiccfHScciTth rtpulsi^ cat first
glance — mid some Valley leaders
  I'Timkctlu11 •   I'ieagfi
— hui Mate licjlih ^fliaals must the
recocted walcf gna through a
OUi fivc-yc.tr piirificalii.^ .tin
iloringproctHthal
INSIDE >-Aslep-by-step(ool<


  (drinking. Ualso is mixed with
regular j^r.-
        i comitlgout
of tile lap lu low lhan 20 pcrccnl.
 Ths dinccpl -- embraced h>
at the recycling process. Page 17



mutiiucs iti St'uii-    :NJI —
w.i% ii      i LI-, '\imelc'.'

trc'in the Mono Lake watershed,
 City and Hniax
the vintics (if 
-------
    > • v1 r^9!9 • j
How to Address These Challenges

-------
Advancements in Treatment Technology
Expand Potable Reuse Opportunities
   Microfiltration: Tiny, straw-like plastic
   membranes filter out bacteria, particles
   and protozoa
   Reverse Osmosis: Water is forced
   through the molecular structure of the
   RO membranes where dissolved
   minerals, Pharmaceuticals, etc. are
   removed
   Ultraviolet Light + Hydrogen Peroxide:
   As a safety barrier, water is exposed to
   UV and H202 that destroys potential
   harmful constituents

-------
Informing the Public is Essential
                             432 on-line surveys
                                            y
                                lephone survey
                                .

                               icnthly e-newslett(


                             Educational video shown on

                             City TV

                             ^\ ^^ ^f "w*."  i   ^n_~ ^- ^ - • •.! >  v - "**
                             67-membar shareholder
                                            Wf&fi"
                             group-
                                                   s
        Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

-------
 ^^^^^^VUv V- ^» .JTJ -J- • v   ^^^^^^^•^^^^^^^^^^^•nB^^^^B^^^HHB^^^^^^^^^^^H^^^^^^^^^H^^^H
Potable Reuse Provides Water Supply

Sustainability: It's Time has Cornel
   Enhanced Supply Reliability
       Trend in global average surface temperature

 Smaller Environmental Footprint
Maximizes Local Resource
                                FMAM      ASON
                            $0.0
                                 Incremental Cost
              Avoided Cost
Cost Competitive with Desal &
     Imported Water

-------
Potable Reuse for Water Supply
           Sustainability
Critical Today, Essential Tomorrow!
                                    Presenter
                                   n, Principal
                          JC Water and Environment
                         .-
                                September 2008
   Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment

-------
          Water Reuse/ Indirect Potable Reuse
Reuse of Water and Biosolids in Sakai City
                 Ms. Kumi Koyama
                Chief, Project Team
  Sewerage Management Division, Sewerage Department
      Waterworks and Sewerage Bureau, Sakai City

-------
  Reuse of Water and Biosolids in Sakai City
Japan
      ,
     Sakai

 r

Kumi Koyama
Sewerage Management Division
Sewerage Department
Waterworks and Sewerage Bureau
Sakai City
              Nintoku-ryo Tumulus     Sen-no-Rikyu

-------
                      Sewage Works of Sakai  City
                     . "•' •.  . . '   • ' ; I ':
                 Sambo
                 Sewage
                 Treatment Plant
     
-------
   Water Environment Restoration Plan of Nintoku-ryo

                Tumulus and Uchikawa River
                              \
        Sayama Pond
                                       .
Irrigation ponds Cluster
        O
VI
                   Improvement of water environment
                                            Supply of seawater
              Nintoku-ryo ??
              Tumulus
\
 F
                                       \
              \
                                           Doigawa River IV
                                           r^     \       \
A network to
connect the history
                                          Old Port of Sakai
                                     	r
                                  Uchikawa River
Pir5t&
                                           Supply of Treated wastewater
  imm*
            Yamato River
                                                       Gulf of Osaka

-------
Basic Revival Plan of Channel between Sayama Pond
               And Nintoku-ryo Tumulus
 Old
Sakai
 Port
       •-
       —
              Uchikawa River
               Doigawa River
                           ^~~J
                                s
                          Nintoku-ryo
                           Tumulus
                           Sayama
                            pond
              *Tr- *•"


 The protection of the
cultural heritage
 The improvement of the
scene
 Maintenance of the
ecosystem
 The security of the
hydrophilic function
 The improvement of the
disaster prevention
function
 The improvement of the
river improvement
function
 Water purification

-------
            "Cool City  Sakai" ( conceptual image )
                                             ( Cool Spot)
                    Anti-heat island
                       measure     I   irrigation ponds
   Restraint of
  passage traffic   Transit

Bicycle
 road
•~i
«*
                                                         Mt. village
                                                        ( Cool Dam )

                                                     Solar power
                                                      generation
      Urban Channel!^ 1
    •c
        (Cool Line)
LRT(low carbon type
     mobility)
                                        nergy
                                     enaissan
                                        ar1
                                                      Low carbon type
                                                       sidential quarter
                                                              ulation of the
                                                     clean energy creation
                                                          institution
Environment
 advanced
lodel complex
                              of the
                         symbiosis
                        ( Cool Dam )
                                                Large-scale solar
                                                  power station
                                                  ( Mega solar) 5

-------
      Treatment plant where hydrangeas Blooms
                    prinkling Pipe
Ground plan of Sambo Sewage Treatment Plant

-------
  25,000
  20,000
b
> 15,000
  10,000
   5,000
       0
                                            ooooooooo
                                            ooooooooo
                                            CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
                                        Year
                                                                         7

-------
      Sakaihama Treated Wastewater Supply Project
Aria
Sakai Hama district (aboutSOOha)
Purpose
Returning to health of water circulation system by reusing
treated wastewater
Ensuring the sustainability by acquiring water resource
Facilities
A water supply pumping station
Two satellite treatment plant (Ozonation)
Pipe (About12km)
                                   Sakai Hai
                                  Sambo t / p
                                  '^     ' •«&»»C*
                                         «•]•••
                                      bi station
                      /
                                                       ity hall
                                                              8

-------
         Treated wastewater  supply
User
NIC
Disaster prevention foothold
Refuse disposal plant
Local industry business cluster
Large companies
Total
Quantity
(m3/d)
400
500
20
80
33,000
34,000
Use
Sprinklings
Sprinkling
Sprinklings
Restroom water, sprinkling
Coolants

NIC

 Satellite up
Wide a
    saster
Large
companies
                   al indus
                   iness cluster
                          lant
                                           Pipeline  network

-------
Quality of Supplied Water

E.coli
Hydrogen ion concentration
Oder
Residual chlorine
Appearance
Fiber filtration water
-
Less than 8.6
More than 5.8
Do not be unpleasant
-
Do not be unpleasant
Ozonation water
Do not be detected
Less than 8.6
More than 5.8
Do not be unpleasant
What is maintained
Do not be unpleasant
                                    10

-------
    Composting Process at Ishizu Plant
                  Ventilation Blois
Track scale
r~r~s
             A mixed   Fermentation
               tub       tub
                I
                                      Product
                                      stuffing
                                     equipment
            Product
            stuffing
           equipment
Super-high temperature aerobic fermentation flow
    1%
concentration
   sluge   I
     Concen
     tration
Fermentation
    and
  Cutback
 Product
processing

-------
     Manufacturing process at Ishizu compost
Pressurization
 dehydrator
Pressurization
 dehydrator
                       Fermentation
                         situation
Fermentation tub
                       Full ripeness
                         manure
                                                        12

-------
Fermentation temperature , outside temperature, and
            moisture change at Ishizu compost
Fermentation Temperature, Outside
Temperature, and Moisture Change
•the temperature of 50cm under the surface
-Outside temperature
-Moisture
                10    15    20    25    30    35    40   45
                  Fermentation days (day)

-------
    Volume and pH change of Ishizu compost
    Capacity Change and PH Change
                                        [^Capacity
                                      -a-
                                          PH
250.0
200.0
^ 150.0


£
u
(0 100.0
o.
CO
o
   50.0
 0.0
     231.00  223.70 218.
                        90
                         210.50 209.40  199i80
                                              190.20
12


11


10


9


8 ;
                                                   6



                                                   5
       0123456
          The number of times of a cutback (time)
                                                        14

-------
Contents of Ishizu compost
An examination item
Arsenic or the compound
cadmium
mercury
nickel
chromium
lead
copper
zinc
calcium
nitrogen
phosphoric acid gross
quantity
Potassium
The C / N ratio
PH
Water
A unit
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
%
%
%
%
-
-
%
A test
result
<1
<2
<0.5
53
50
16
300
460
18.7
1.5
3.01
0.08
6.3
7.8
28.5
The maximum of
the harmful
ingredient
50
5
2
300
500
100









                                       About the
                                       heavy metal
                                       such as arsenic,
                                       cadmium,
                                       mercurial nickel,
                                       chrome, the
                                       lead, there is it
                                 -•  /   within the
                                       standard value
                                       of the national
                                       law.
                                               15

-------
                           onclusi
The composting of sludge has already reached practical use.
The reuse of treated wastewater develops to the usage in the city,

We are going to push forward investigation.
We would like to build a sustainable recycling society system.
                                                            16

-------
Membrane Bioreactors

-------
               Membrane Bioreactors
State of the Art of MBR Technology and Its
             Perspective in Japan
                Dr. Hiroki Itokawa
                   Researcher
     Research and Technology Development Division
           Japan Sewage Works Agency (JS)

-------
5th US/Japan Joint Conference, March 2-5, 2009
State-of-the-art ofMBR
Technology and Its
Perspective in Japan
                                    1
            Hiroki ITOKAWA
               R&TD Division,
          Japan Sewage Works Agency (JS),
                 Japan
               Japan Sewage Works Agency

-------
IVlDrx!  A combination of biological WWT (e.g. activated sludge)
   and membrane filtration as a measure for solid-liquid separation.
> Advantages over CAS processes:
      - Complete rejection of suspended solids.
      - Higher MLSS (>10 g/L).
      - Smaller footprint (< 6hr for BNR).
      - Smaller sludge production.
      - Simple monitoring parameters (e.g. IMP).

> Installed worldwide, from small-scale on-site
  WWTPs to large-scale municipal WWTPs.
> Full-scale application to municipal WWTPs has
  just around ten years history.

-------
MBR  - Growing market
        Rodingen (GER)
          3,240 m3/d
           Brescia (ITA)
            42,000 m3/d
Porlock(UK)
 1,900m3/d
Swanage (UK)
 12,700 m3/d
                            -*.
                                 Nordkanal (GER)
                                   45,000 m3/d
                                        50,000

                                        40,000  I?

                                        30,000
                                        20,000
                                               o
                                10,000  *

                                0
98  99  00  01  02  03  04   05
             Year
                         - Mean  : 3,780 m3/d
      Development of municipal
      MBR installations in Europe
             - Median : 1,300m3/d
                                    Others

                                    France

                                    Spain

                                    Italy

                                    Germany

                                    UK

                                    Max.
                                    Capacity

-------
Large MBR projects worldwide
  WWTP name
  Jumeirah Golf Estates
  Palm Jebel AH
  Brightwater
  Jebel AH Free Zone
  International City
  Johns Creek
  Beixiaohe
  AI-Ansab
  Peoria
  Lusail
  Qinghe
  Syndial
Location  I Commissioning I Hydraulic capacity
 Dubai
 Dubai
  USA
 Dubai
 Dubai
  USA
 China
 Oman
  USA
 Qatar
 China
  Italy
2010
2010
2010
2007
2007
2007
2007
2006
2007
2007
200
2007
220,000 m3/d
220,000 m3/d
144,000 m3/d
140,000 m3/d
110,000 m3/d
 93,500 m3/d
 80,000 m3/d
 78,000 m3/d
 75,700 m3/d
 60,200 m3/d
 60,000 m3/d
 47,300 m3/d

-------
            Building-scale on-site WWTPs (1981-)
             On-site household WWTPs "johkaso" (1985-)
           ^  Night soil treatment plants (7988-)
                                   WWTPs for "rural sewerage project" (2001-)

                                   Municipal WWTPs  (2005-)
                                                        MBRfor"/o/?/caso"
      JS Pilot-scale
         studies
       (1st phase)
Feasibility
Design parameters
     - Operating cost
      reduction
  JS Pilot-scale
     studies
   (2nd phase)

     ^	^
      JSMBR
  Evaluation Report
            *
JS Design Recommendations
                     *
                     1st
                 installation
      JS Pilot-scale
         studies
       (3rd phase)
                                                                                    Night soil TP
- Larger-scale
 application
                 *
            9MBRs
          in operation

                                                           WWTP for rural
                                                         sewerage project

-------
JS pilot-scale studies (1st phase)
> Pilot-scale study with 4 private companies
   (1998-2001)	
  - Four membranes (Kubota, Zenon, Mitsubishi Rayon and
   Hitachi Plant).
  - Process evaluation.
  - Design and operating parameters.

-------
> Pilot-scale study with 6 private companies
  (2001-2004)
 - Five membranes (Kubota, Zenon, Mitsubishi Rayon, Hitachi
   Plant, and Asahi Kasei Chemicals).
 - Reduction of operating cost by 30%.

-------
Design guideline for municipal MBR
                            8
 > JS Design Recommendations for MBR (2003)

  - Fixed process configuration and design parameters.
  - Even plant layout is "standardized" regardless of
    membrane type used.
    * Capacity: 200 - 3,000 m3/d after flow equalization.
   Influent
           Fine
          screen
Coagulant
(P removal)
Cleaning
chemicals
         Equalization
           tank
            Mixer







1)










•
i
1 •-



Anoxic
^^tank
©

{ 	
..j


^
w
Oxic
tank
AA
_m
f D •
» r •
»«*•



L L
X
[£>
AA/
1







\
i


\/ '\"7:
v :
•^ •/%-:
•mmmmm'm
	 . np t-inlf


\ Membrane
units
(B)
                     Internal recycle
          Excess
          sludge
                                        Blower

-------
Design guideline for municipal MBR
 > JS Design Recommendations for MBR (2003)
  - Universal design parameters.
 Flow equalization
 Fine screen
 Bioreactor configuration
 Anoxic HRT
 Aerobic HRT
 MLSS
 Internal recycle
Prerequisite (4.6 hr, typically)
1 mm
Pre-denitrification (MLE)
3hr
3 hr (membrane submerged)
10g/L
200 % of influent

-------
Municipal MBR installations
                                                     10
         Name
   1
Fukusaki
Kobugahara
Yusuhara
Okutsu
      Daitocho
      Tohro
   7  Kaietsu
   8  Jousai
      Heda
              Commissioning   I Capacity [m3/d]* I   Supplier
Mar 2005
Apr 2005
Dec 2005
Apr 2006
 ep 2006
Mar 2007
                Apr 2007
                Mar 2008
                Mar 2008
4,200(12,600)
    240
  400 (800)
    600
 1,000(2,000)
    125
              2,140(3,200)
  Kubota
  Kubota
  Kubota
  Zenon
  Kubota
  Kubota
 Mitsubishi
Asahi-Kasei
   itachi
  A value in the parentheses indicates a full-capacity in future.

-------
                                                           11
Fukusaki WWTP  - 2,100 m3/d; to be expanded to 12,600 m3/d
                  - Kubota FS membrane

-------
Municipal MBRs installations
12
Okutsu WWTP
  - 600 m3/d
  - GE-Zenon HF membrane

-------
                                                         13
Kaietsu WWTP
  - 230 m3/d
  - Mitsubishi HF membrane

-------
Ongoing project
                                   14
> 3rd phase pilot-scale study with 4 private
   companies (2006-2009)
    Four membranes (Kubota, Hitachi Plant, Asahi Kasei
    Chemicals, and M eta water).
    Demonstrating systems for larger-scale installation.
  Asahi Kasei
 Chemicals (HF)
Metawater
(Ceramics)
Kubota (FS)
Hitachi Plant (FS)

-------
Toward larger-scale installations
                 15
Small-scale MBR

- Less than 3,000 m3/d
- New construction
_
- Standardized system
configuration
e

Influpnt i — *

H_
• — »
Flow
squalization





Anoxic







V
i_
4"
I

-------
                                                                    16
>  It is important to design the system fit to existing facilities.
>  A standardized approach is no longer efficient; a variety of
   system configurations is required.
Biological treatment
 - N removal (MLE)
     -  N&P removal (A2O, UCT)
Membrane filtration
 - Integrated
-  Separated
-  External
                                    -izr
Quality control/evaluation
  Design manual development
  Computer simulation
                                 Membranes
                  - Flat sheet
                                  - Hollow fibre
                                                - Ceramics

-------
                                                       17
> In the 3rd phase pilot-scale studies, the following points are
  particularly concerned.

 New membranes/modules (modules with hig
 packing density, ceramic membrane...).
 Membrane systems other than integrated on
 (separated or external system).
 Optimized internal recycle.
 Incorporation of EBPR.
 Gravity filtration for FS membranes.
 Use of primary sedimentation.
 Improved chemical cleaning
 (automated RC, optimized doze...).
 Post RO treatment for effluent reuse
                                            effluent  concentra

-------
>  What is necessary for the FUTURE of MBR in Japan

 -  Cost reduction (construction & operation)
 -  Acceptance of the technology
 -  Motivation for improving effluent quality/safety
 -  Innovation in urban water management

>  Current topics
                       ne for r
- Preparation of a guideline for membrane technology
  by MLIT (2008 -).
- Design of 60,000 m3/d MBR (2009 -).
- Evaluation of existing small-scale MBRs (2009 -).

                                                     18

-------



Thank you for
your kind attentionJ



-------
                   Membrane Bioreactors
Investigation of Membrane Bioreactor Effluent Water
               Quality and Technology
                   Ms. Joan Oppenheimer
                      Vice President
             MWH Technical Strategy and Research

-------
  Investigation of Membrane Bioreactor
 Effluent Water Quality and Technology
              (WRF- 06-007)

             Joan Oppenheimer
              James DeCarolis
                 Zakir Hirani
            Japan - U.S. Joint Conference
On Drinking Water Quality Management and Wastewater Control
                 March 2-5, 2009
MWH
                               FOUNDATION

-------
       ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

• WateReuse Foundation & Funding Partners
 (USBR & GWRC Members)

• Utility Advisory Panel


• Technical Advisory Panel


• Arizona State University

• Participating MBR Vendors, Kruger/Toray, Norit/X-
flow, Parkson Corporation, Huber Technologies, Koch/Puron,
GE/Zenon, Siemens/US Filter, Enviroquip/Kubota,  Asahi
Kaesi/Pall

-------
             Overview



Acknowledgments



Project Background & Objectives



Technical Approach



Project Status
Future Work Tasks

-------
   MUNICIPAL MBR
MARKET GROWTH (U.S.)

-------
 INCREASED MBR INSTALLATIONS
  0)
  n

  E
  3
    50
    40
30
  0)


  I  20

  3

  E


  «  10
     0
                  Municipal MBR Installations in the U.S.
                1 -5 MGD
                       5 - 10 MGD
             10 MGD
         From 2004 to 2007

           215% Increase
         2004
              2005
2006
2007
Upcoming
* Cumulative number for 1-MGD or greater installations only; revised March 2007.

 Data compiled from information obtained from MBR vendors

-------
      INCREASED MBR CAPACITY
Facility Name (Location)
Capacity
 (MGD)
   Supplier
Start Up
  Traverse City WWTP
   (Traverse City, Ml)
  7.1
GE Water / Zenon
 2004
    Tempe-Keyne
     (Tempe, AZ)
         GE Water/Zenon
                  2006
     Bright Water
   (King County, WA)
  31
GE Water/Zenon
 2007
Johns Creek Env. Campus
        (GA)
  10.9
GE Water/Zenon
 2007
      Tri Cities
 (Clackamas County, OR)
   10
     TBD
 2009
   Cape Coral North
   (Cape Coral, FL)
 10-20
     TBD
 2010
   Clear Spring Ranch
 (Colorado Springs, CO)
  8-32
     TBD
 2012

-------
    INCREASED MBR SUPPLIERS
     1

     10

      8

      6
   fl  2
      0
            2001
2004
2007
California Department of Public Health Services (CDPH), Treatment
Technology Report for Recycled Water, Jan. 2007.

-------
 Challenges Facing MBRs from a
   "Water Quality Perspective"
Dispersed Amount of Water Quality Performance Data
Increasing low nutrient requirements
Future requirements for EDC/PPCP removal
Energy Increasing Water Quality Requirements
 Impact of Peaking on Water Quality Performance

-------
       Project Objectives


To capture global water quality
performance data of municipal MBR
systems


Assess the impact of various key
operational and desiqn conditions to
achieve specific water quality criteria


Identify Knowledge Gaps related to MBR
technology

-------
   Technical Approach
        Phase I
Conduct Comprehensive Survey
             Phase II
      Data Analysis / Visualization
                    Phase III
            Project Workshop / Final Product

-------
               Phase I
Conduct Comprehensive Survey
              RELEVANCE:

  Rapid growth of global industry has led to
  dispersed amount of data on MBR effluent water
  quality performance
- Industry sectors: Research, Vendor/system
  suppliers, and full-scale implementation

-------
              Phase I
Conduct Comprehensive Survey
             APPROACH:
- Survey of Literature / Case Studies
- Survey of MBR Vendors
- Worldwide Survey of MBR Plant Owners and
 Operators

-------
 Survey of Literature / Case Studies

   • 11dentify Removal Mechanisms for Various
    Wastewater Contaminants
    Assess Global Trends with Regard to Water
    Quality Requirements and Drivers

    Review Recent Research (published / grey) to
    Capture MBR Performance Data
1 Includes Development of Predictive Model

-------
   MOD (-4000 m3/d)
                 MKOC
                 MEMBRANE SYSTEM!
Includes all Vendors offering
MBR Systems for municipal
wastewater treatment
in US & abroad

Requested Basic Information:
location, capacity, start-up year,
driver for selection, etc
PARKSON CORPORATION
 ... ihe environmental technology company
         X-Flow
 IEMIEI
                   KM boh
                   Enviroquip, Inc.

-------
Survey of Plant Owner and  Operators
  Targeting Key Parameters related
to design, operation and water quality
performance

•  Survey web-based to provide         *
easy access and downloading of data  MBR Plant: 9 MGD AZ USA
•  Target Plant List based
on Key Selection Criteria
7
                            MBR Plant: 11.9 MGD Germany

-------
 Phase II - Data Analysis /
        Visualization
          RELEVANCE:

Goal of the Data translation is to demonstrate
the impact of operational / design choices on
MBR performance and product water quality

-------
     Phase II - Data Analysis /

            Visualization

            APPROACH:

- Review Survey Data (Team Consensus)

- Bin Data into appropriate performance
 classifications
- Team Consensus on Data Analysis / Presentation

-------
    Phase II - Data Analysis /
             Visualization
Assessment of Survey Data to ID Key issues
 • Define MBR Water quality capabilities
 • Define Operating Conditions Required to meet specific water
  quality objectives
 • Identify strengths/weaknesses of MBR for the removal of
  specific contaminants
  Assess nutrient removal limitations of MBR
  Define optimized operating conditions for EDC/PPCP
  removal
  Determine the theoretical operational limits of MBR

-------
Phase
- Project Workshop and
 Final Product
              RELEVANCE
-Validate Project Findings

- Confirm knowledge/technical gaps to identify
  future research needs
- Identify best way to present the final product of
  the project to maximize use by MBR industry

-------
Phase
- Project Workshop and
 Final Product
             APPROACH
- Conduct Project Workshop
- Review of Project Goals and Preliminary Data
- Work Groups to focus on Specific Topics
- Finalize Planned Format and Project Deliverable

-------
       Project Status
          (Phase I)
Prepared write-up on basic removal
mechanisms & MBR removal performance
related to targeted water quality
contaminants
Completed survey of eight MBR system
vendors
Developed and Launched Worldwide MBR
Survey to identified plants

-------
Summary of  MBR  Removal Mechanisms
                   Contaminant B
          Contaminant A
                 Contaminant B
                            Contaminant
                            C,D,E
Contaminant
A,B,C
                   Contaminant
                   A,B,C,D,E,F
Removal Mechanism

 D Biotransformation

 • Size exclusion

 D Sorption to solids

 D Complexation

 D Inertial impaction

 n Sorption to membrane
  biofilm
                             Contaminant Type
                            A = inorganic micro-constituent
                            B = microbial
                            C = organic micro-constituent
                            D = nutrients
                            E = aggregate organics
                            F = suspended solids

-------
Example of Vendor Survey Results
                Drivers / Process Selection Criterias
             11%
                  1%
             46%
D Footprint Limitation

D Pretreatment for RO

D Disinfection Credit

D Improved Water Quality &
 Reliability
• Low Nutrient Requirement

D Cost-effectiveness

• Others

-------
Example of MBR Predictive

       Model Output
  o
  o
   35
   30
   25
  c 20
  o



  1 15
  0)
  o
  c
  o
  o
10
  O
  O
   0
    0
      MBR Effluent Quality Depending On SRT
     10
20   30



  SRT (days)
40
50
60

-------
IV.
        Worldwide  MBR Web Survey
                                              Online Surveys | Zoomerane;
Background
Preliminary / Primary Treatment
Bioreactor Design & Operation
Membrane Design & Operation
Water Quality Goals &
Performance
                                                       Investigation of Membrane Bioreactor Effluent
                                                       Water Quality and Technology
                                               Welcome to the Online Survey "Investigation of Membrane Biore actor Effluent Walter Quality and
                                               Technology*. The overaM goal of this project is to investigate (he effluent water quality of municipal
                                               MBR facilities designed for product flows 2 1 million gallons per day (3,785 m3 I day). Information
                                               received from this survey will be analyzed collectively and presented anonymously in the final project
                                               report

                                               The survey contains 51 questions and is estimated to lake 15-30 minutes to complete. We know your
                                               time is valuable and appreciate your participation in this important project Upon completion of the
                                               survey all participants will receive a $20 Gift Certificate to Amazon.com

                                               ff you have any questions regarding this survey, please contact James DeCarolis @ +1 319 204 2537
                                               or by &mai ^ JBmgs.deearolislgimwtijlQbal MMTI
                                              Onim& Survey* | OuKtomwlatisructHm Surwya | SMS MMMle Surveys | Oitiln* Panels
                                              CQjjyrtgf![e{999-2DD3 HarfcafToc*me. A3RJ*rsReeswa PrtncyPoltey | TwimMuw | Help
VI.  Lesson Learned
                                                   g.com;Sim'ev/smvev-mtto.zn?p=WEB228HV'MP'N4JH

-------
Facility Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Country
USA
USA
Italy
UK
USA
Germany
UK
USA
Singapore
USA
Spain
USA
USA
USA
USA
UK
Dubai
China
Netherlands
Dubai
China
USA
Australia
Region
Americas
Americas
Europe
Europe
Americas
Europe
Europe
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Americas
Europe
Americas
Americas
Americas
Americas
Europe
Asia-Pacific
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Asia-Pacific
Asia-Pacific
Americas
Asia-Pacific
Design
Capacity
(MGD)
1.1
2.5
11.1
2.6
6.0
11.9
1.9
4.1
6.0
9.0
1.1
1.5
1.8
6.0
1.0
1.5
4.8
26.4
1.0
5.0
3.2
2.0
11.6
Plant Start
Up (Year)
2001
2002
2002
2004
2004
2004
2005
2006
2006
2006
2006
2005
2005
2006
2008
—
	
2007
2007
2007
2008
2006
2009
Manufacturer
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
GE/Zenon
Huber
Enivroquip/Kubota
Enivroquip/Kubota
Enivroquip/Kubota
Enivroquip/Kubota
Enivroquip/Kubota
Kubota
Microza
Norit
Norit
Puron
Siemens
Siemens
Drivers
C&D

A

D

E


D
D
A&F
A&F
A&F |
A&D&F |
C |
A&D

D |
A&D |

D |
A&G

-------
         Future Work Tasks
Complete MBR Plant Survey
Conduct Data Analysis and Visualization
Convene Project Workshop
Prepare Draft Final Product for submittal to
WateReuse Foundation Summer 2009

-------
Desalination

-------
                   Desalination
Status and Challenges for Desalination in the
                 United States
                Mr. Andrew L. Shea
              USA Development Director
              AccionaAgua Corporation

-------
 Status and  Challenges for Desalination
              in the United States
Andrew L. Shea
USA Development Director
March 4, 2008
Japan - U.S. Joint Conference On Drinking Water Quality
Management and Wastewater Control                       rf\
                                            (dacciona
                                                   Agua

-------
   Topics for Discussion
US Desalination Historical Perspective
Global and US Desal Capacity
A Tale of Two Countries- US and Spain
Representative Existing and New
Projects
Institutional Barriers to Development
Stakeholder Commitment to Research
Concluding Comments
                               acciona
                              ^-J     Ajua

-------
             ACCIONA Agua
Design and build water treatment plants
Desalination by reverse osmosis
Drinking water treatment plant
Wastewater treatment plant
Sludge treatment plant

Operation and maintenance

Integrated water supply & sanitation services

100 treatment plants operated + maintained by acciona agua
    30 cities/towns managed by acciona agua
    over 11 million people served
70 RO desalination plants
    1.6 million m3/d fresh water
230 wastewater treatment plants
100 potable water treatment plants
•i**g
                                                       /Jacciona
                                                                Agua

-------
       US Desalination  Historical Perspective
DEMONSTRATION PLANTS
 i llrpjrtmntl u/ tin luttriar Sullar Itv/rr < mn-rniua Dfmiwtlrjlioii Pl,tul.
                 Prruhtg a iprcial kallta OK ka
                 ,tnt I'M Ibt Wltftt llamr. PrniJcHI
                 Ktrmnis figHals tf>, i/-ir/-jrp aj ihr
                 Fretptrl, Tex. iftint u-*ltr conetf
                 lisa ilfaiaattrjtiaH plant.
Federal Office of Saline
Water Demonstrates
1  MGD Thermal Desal
in Freeport, TX-1960
Plant Operated at Dow
Chemical until Critical
Maintenance Issues
Occurred
Program Confirmed
Role of Public and
Private Sector using
MSF Thermal Desal
Technology
Source: Saline Water Conversion/DOl
                   acciona
                 ^J       Agua

-------
     US Desalination Historical Perspective
RO Membrane invented
at UCLA-1959
RO Membranes
Commercialized at
General Atomic Labs in
San Diego- 1960's
Early Use on Brackish
Waters in South Florida
Primary RO market was
DOD and Industry
  How Did the US Get So Far Behind?
                                         acciona
                                       v-)     Agua

-------
           Global Desalination Capacity
               More than Doubled in the Last 10 years!
                                                18:494
                 63.6 m3/d  -  16,800 mgd
         1990 1992 1994 1996  1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008



             Cumulative Contracted Desalination Capacity-
WDR vol. 44. no. 33 - Sept 08
                                                        acciona
                                                     ^J       Agua

-------
 Global Desalination Capacity  by Technology
                  4% ED
                2,220,133 m3/d
          9% MED  587MGD
         5.629,368 nrr/d
          1487MGD
1% Other
901,233m3/d
 238 MOD
        27% MSF
       17,300,196 m3/d
        4,571 MOD
          59% RO
         37,066,568 m3/d
          9,790 MOD
                      A majority of recent
                      capacity additions
                      have been RO
                      systems, including
                      hybrid RO/Thermal
                      systems
            Contracted Capacity' By Technology
WDR vol.44, no. 33 - Sept 08
                                                        acciona
                                                      ^J       Agua

-------
Worldwide Installed and Forecasted Capacity by Significant Country

                           >             ^  •


                           -'I       I
                                  5
                                   •  II
 2006 2010 2025
Spain

Algeria
                                   8,2
                                2,6
                              0,7

                             2006 2010 2025
                                       2006 2010 2025
              Middle

               East

                           (capacity in million m3/day)
                                 2006 2010 2025
                                     •|r
                                Australia
Source: GWI Desal Database 10/06

                                      acciona
                                    ^J        Agua

-------
Hydrologic Profile of Spain
Available water reserves overexploted in Spain and  in US
                Use of Water Reserves in Different Regions
                                                               Overexploited
                                                               Heavy exploited
                                                               Moderatly exploited
                                                               Slightly exploited
 Source: Global Water
 Intelligence 10/06
                                                              acciona
                                                            ^J        Agua

-------
A Tale of Two Countries - Hydrologic Profile of Spain

               Mar Cantttbrico
     Mar
  Mediterraneo
      OC£ANO

     ATLANTICO
     OCCANO ATLANTICO
Litres / m2
I	I  <300
 _  300-400
 D  400-600
I  I  600-800
^  >soo
                                           Spain is one
                                           of the driest
                                           European
                                           Countries
                                           Costal Zones
                                           Receive 11 -
                                           15  inches per
                                           year of Rain
                                 Source: INM Spain
                        acciona
                      ^J      Agua

-------
A Tale of Two Countries - Hydraulic Profile of the US
   U.S. Drought Monitor
                                         December 30, 2008
                                              Vaiil ft a.m. EST
         Q2A'

   tattnsif-i'-
    I DO Abrormally Dry     f* Dwtrwaw*
    1 D1 Drought - Moderate  A =• Agrcurtw rai itrops oasrturea
   H D2 Droughl - Smvmrm             grasslands)
   • P3 Drought - EKlraiiio   H Hydrologlc-al iwalefi
   • D4
Local
                  orj
         h-o.'K may vary See
                                     U5DA
     littp Jj'd naught, u n I .eduftlm
                                 Rcteas&d Wednesctay, December 31, 2008
                                    BiiHt) Fticfts, Hsirdttal DffiurQtll MilrgjlfCirt
                                                                acciona
                                                                         Agua

-------
Spanish Desalination  Market - General Overview
      Spain is one of the largest users of SWRO in the world
      First desalination plant commissioned more than 40 years ago in Canary Islands
      Demographic concentration in coastal areas and tourism have contributed to
      RO market growth with a large resistance to interbasin water transfers
      More than 50 projects in the planning or construction stage with 700 mgd ( 2.6
      billion m3/d) proposed
      Almost  740 projects online or presumed online producing 1020 mgd (3.8 billion
      m3/d) of desal capacity. (www.DesalData.com )
      Spain has become a pioneer  in the use of Reverse Osmosis and in the
      implementation of new energy recovery technologies in RO facilities
      Most contracts awarded through Design-Build-Operate procurement approach
      Central Government responsible for establishing country's water policy and
      financing major water infrastructure projects but local governments responsible
      for determining water tariffs
                                                                 (dacciona
                                                                           Agua

-------
Spanish Desalination Market-A Doubling of Capacity
1,600,000
1,400,000
;*
Q 1,200,000
l_
0
L 1,000,000
(ft
t_
800,000
s
.2 600,000
3
dnn nun
200,000
0.



/
/
> /*
•^ / >•

^*^*^^

T 1 1 1 1 1
1980 1986 1990 1996 2000 2006
• Total Production The productjon of desalinated water in Spain
I Urban Usage doubled from 2000 to 2004. The Spanish gov-
• Agricultural Usage ernment predicts that production will double
• again in another five years.
Industrial Usage
| Source: AEDYR
  MIT Technology Review 2006
                                                2008 Planning
                                                and construction
                                                stage - 700 mgd
                                                (2.6 billion m3/d)

                                                Online Capacity
                                                1019 mgd

                                                (3.8 billion m3/d)
                                                      acciona
                                                    ^J      Agua

-------
US  Desalination Market - General Overview
  •  Large Federal Government presence in water allocation and pricing

  •  Strong focus on low cost water withdrawals and imported water
     supply

  •  47 projects in the planning stage with 811 mgd ( 3.07 billion m3/d)
     proposed

  •  29 plants in construction with 205 mgd (779 million m3/d)

  •  1432 plants online or presumed online with 2132 mgd (8.07 billion)
     production

  •  Of the 2008 capacity, 11% is SWRO, 75% is brackish water, and 14%
     is industrial high purity water supply.

  •  SWRO has increased 10% per annum while Brackish RO increased  3-
     5% and Industrial/other has increased 4%

  •  Most contracts awarded through Design-Bid-Build procurement
     approach rather than DBO
  Source: www.DesalData.com/WDR
(dacciona
          Agua

-------
Cumulative U.S. Desalting Capacity Has Doubled in Last Decade

c nnn nnn _, ,_1 Rdfl
D,UlX),UUUl jffl.DUU


5,000,000 -

1
E 4,000,000-
i
'o
£3,000,000-
1

IB
V
Cumulative Installed Capacity /
____„____„. ,____*___
«
•
,*#
*#
«— __ UM. UUI. -«>- — — — •- — -"- 	 —"- ^ -..- ..-.. ._- . «M. -.™ ...— -"— "—
XX . t i. 1 1
	 	 •:*, T TTr. TTT i.ll Li Mi hi



•1,400
•1,200
Q
•1,000 i
0
Ml
-800 |
^n
iU
0
-600 S
1
-400 -
•200

•0
1952 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
2008 Data


"47 projects in the
planning stage with 81 1
mgd (3.07 billion m3/d)
proposed

"29 plants in
construction with 205
mgd (779 million m3/d)
under contract
- 1432 plants online
with 21 32 mgd (8.07
billion) production


Source: GWI 10/06 and DesalData 1/09
                                                           ^dacciona
                                                                     Agua

-------
Representative Existing and Proposed US Desal Projects
Proposing Entity
California
Marin Municipal WD
SF Bay Area Regional
Santa Cruz/Soquel Creek
California American
Sand City
City of Santa Barbara
Los Angeles DWP
West Basin MWD
Long Beach Water Dept
Poseidon
MWD Orange County
Poseidon
Location

SF Bay Area
SF Bay Area
Santa Cruz
Monterey
Monterey
Barbara County
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Haynes P. Plant
Huntington Beach
Dana Point
Carlsbad/ Encina
Water Type

SWRO
Brackish/SWRO
SWRO
SWRO
SWRO
SWRO
SWRO
SWRO
Nano/Nano
SWRO
SWRO
SWRO
Cap. mgd

5-15
71
2.5
10
0.3
5-10
25
20
9
50
15
50
                                               acciona
                                             ^-J      Ajua

-------
Representative Existing and Proposed US Desal Projects
Texas
El Paso Utilities/Fort Bliss
Brownsville PUB
San Antonio Water Siystem.
Brazos River Authority
Florida
Tampa Bay Water
City of Tarpon Springs
City of Hialeah/Miami
Coquina Coast
Other Areas
United Water of NY
Taunton Mass

El Paso
Brownsville
San Antonio
Lake Granbury

Big Bend/Tampa
Tarpon Springs
Miami Bade County.
Palm Coast

Rocklin County
Taunton River

Brackish RO
SWRO
Brackish RO
Surface BRO

SWRO
Brackish RO
Brackish RO
SWRO

Brackish RO
Brackish RO

27.4
2.5/25
20
15.5

25-28
6
17.5
50

4
5
                                            (dacciona
                                                    AjU»

-------
    Representative  BRO and  SWRO  Projects
U.S. Drought Monitor
                                           December 30, 2008
                                               Vaiil ft a.m. EST
     ^ DO Abrornnally Dry
     ] D1 DrougM - Moderate
    H CO1 Oroughl - S*wm
    • D3 Drought - Exlraiiia
    • D4 DrxujQHt - Exceptional
               f* O»lr*a»s
               A - Agrcuttufal itfops pastures
                        grasslands}
               H Hydrologies) r*ater'i
Local can&itio.is may vary See

  littp jVd rough! u n I .edui'dm
                                                               Proposed
                                                               Projects
                                 Released Wednesctay, December 31, 2008
                              Auittor- Brian Fhiefts, Hsifottal Dffiogtii Miirgjifort
Florida leads existing capacity over CA, AZ, and TX

California proposes 400 - 500 mgd from 20  Projects
                                                          acciona
                                                                  Agua

-------
Proposed Seawater Desalination Projects in CA
                   Proposed
                   Seawater
                   Desalination
                   Plants in
                   California
  Yamada/AMTA 3/08
Northern California
 *  Moss Landing
 "  San Francisco Bay Area
 ?  Cambria
 «*  Sand City
 9  Santa Cruz
 *  San Rafeal (Marin)
 *  LEAD Project
          *  Southern California
             *  Carlsbad
             3  Camp Pendleton
             *  Dana Point
             J  Long Beach
             "  ElSegundo
             «*  Scattergood
                                                              acciona
                                                           ^J        Agua

-------
    CA - Bay Area Regional Desalination Project
Joint effort among:
 - East Bay Municipal Utility
   District
 - San Francisco Public Utilities
 - Commission. Contra Costa
 - WD Santa Clara Valley WD
Pilot Study at Mallard Slough
 - 100gpm
 - Testing to have started July
   2008
Feasibility Study leading to
permitting of 71 mgd (270,000
m3/d BRO/SWRO facility
Expected construction in 2012
                                                      acciona
                                                    ^J       Agua

-------
CA - Moss Landing Seawater Desalination Project
Coastal Water Project need
based on groundwater
overdrafts off Carmel River
Cal-Am Water developing 12
mgd facility at Moss Landing
Power Plant site
Solves SWRCB 95-10 Order
to Reduce Carmel River
Withdrawals
Pilot study using existing
power plant cooling water
system
CPUC regulated permitting
process for water utility
Allows for River Restoration
of 11370AFY
                                                  acciona
                                                ^J      Agua

-------
       CA - MWDOC - Dana Point
State Sponsored
Study found 15 mgd
capacity is feasible
Slant well subsurface
intake
Supply-13% of
South Orange County
demands
CEQA/NEPAand
permitting expected to
begin this year
Project anticipated
online date of 2015
                                      acciona
                                           Agua

-------
 CA - Camp Pendleton/San Diego County
Northern San Diego
County U.S. Marine
Corps Base Camp
Pendleton
Possible Subsurface or
open intake options
Potential integration with
existing Camp Pendleton
utilities
Proposed capacity
between 50 and 150 mgd
(189-567,000 m3/d)
Study completion in 2009
                                            acciona
                                          ^J     Agua

-------
     CA - Carlsbad Seawater Desalination Project
50 mgd (189,000 m3/d) desalination
project being developed by Poseidon
Resources at the Encina Power
Station in Carlsbad
Water purchase agreements with
nine Water Authority member
agencies
Major Project Permits Completed
Project
 - EIR certified
 - NPDES Discharge permit with
   Regional Water Quality Control
   Board
 - Coastal development permit with
   Coastal Commission approved w/
   conditions and mitigation
 - Lease amendment application
   approved by State Lands
   Commission with mitigation
   measures
Lawsuits Pending  by Surfrider and
Planning & Conservation League
challenging the Coastal Development
Permit, NPDES Conditions
  acciona
^J       Agua

-------
       Brackish  Groundwater Projects in CA
   Santa Ana
   Arlington
   Chino
   Ferris
   Irvine Desalter
   Deep Aquifer
   Menifee Basin
   Alameda
   Beverly Hills
   Oxnard
   Port Hueneme
   Temescal
   West Basin
                 Monterey
                 Morro Bay
Reynolds
San Luis Rey
Yamada/AMTA 3/08
                                                             acciona
                                                                    Agua

-------
   CA - Chino Basin Brackish Desalter
JPA with seven agencies
manages Chino Basin
Total production of Chino
Basin -134 mgd (507,000
m3/d)
Chino I Desalter and Chino
II Desalter produce 22 mgd
(83,280 m3/d)
Treatment process RO and
ion exchange
Expand production 22 mgd
(83,280 m3/d) by 2015
Regional Brine line to
Ocean outfall in Orange
County
                                              acciona
                                            ^J      Agua

-------
            TX - San Antonio BRO
                                               B
20 mgd (75,700 m3/d)
proposed capacity
Brackish RO with well
field and disposal
Well testing from
Wilcox Aquifer
Feasibility Study 2008
RFQ/RFP in 2009
Supply to supplement
Edwards Aquifer and
conservation
                                    Atascoss
                                    /Well
Upper Wilcox —
Muddy .*i|n i.n.i
                Fresh Water
               Carriio Aquifer
  Lower Wilcox
   Brackish
   Aquitar

                  WILCOX
                • Tost sites In Bexar and
                Atascosa Counties
                • Sites 1 and 2 completed
                • Site 3 near completion
                                               acciona
                                                     Agua

-------
      TX - El Paso Water Utilities/Ft. Bliss
27.5 mgd output from
brackish Hueco Bolson
Joint Fort Bliss strategic
supply
Increased recovery
strategies to limit discharge
to disposal wells
15.5 mgd (58,670 m3/d)
permeate blended with 12
mgd (45,424 m3/d) new
groundwater wells
Complements water reuse
and conservation program
Integrated Community and
R&D Center
                                                 acciona
                                               ^J      Agua

-------
  TX - Brownsville Seawater Desalination
One of three sites selected
for feasibility studies
Funded by TWDB and
Brownsville PUB
One acre plant site in Port
of Brownsville -Ship
channel intake
Pilot plant Operated for 12
months with varied water
conditions
Current request for 2.5
mgd (9463 m3/d)
demonstration at $29
million public funds
Target 25 mgd (94,630
m3/d) full scale plant
                              Lower Rio Grande Regional
                                              dacciona
                                                      Agua

-------
 FL - Tampa Seawater Desalination Facility
25-28mgd(108
million m3/d) co-
located at power plant
10% of regional supply
Remediated process
with long-term
operations under DBO
contract
Total Environmental
compliance in sensitive
eco system
                                       acciona
                                             Agua

-------
         FL - City of Hialeah BRO
17.5 mgd brackish RO
in 3 phases
3 DBO consortia
selected for RFP
Phase in 2009
Groundwater wells,
RO plant, Disposal
wells in Miami-Dade
County
Pilot Testing by mid-
2009
Completion by end of
2011

                                        acciona
                                      ^J     Agua

-------
     MA - Taunton Brackish River Water Desal
Initial withdrawal from the
coastal basin to produce
5mgd(18,927m3/d),
expandable to 10 mgd
(37,854 m3/d)
Plant process: ultra-
filtration followed by
reserve osmosis
Tidal intake with 16 mile,
20 inch diameter
transmission pipeline
Entrainment and
impingement control
Discharge concentrate
during high tides
                                                 acciona
                                                       Agua

-------
Institutional Barriers to Desalination in the US
 Within California, the primary impediment is
 Permitting, Permitting, Permitting
 Project Development Phase Funding and
 Locating Developable Land are also
 Stumbling Blocks
 "New" Desal Water seen as Growth
 Inducing
 Large-scale Projects at Power Plant sites
 inherit Power Plant Baggage and CWA
 316b entrainment and impingement issues
                                    acciona
                                   ^-J     Ajua

-------
CA - Seawater Desalination Permitting Issues
 The 50 mgd Carlsbad Project has set a Precedent for most, if
 not all, California Coastal [Desalination
 Carbon Footprint - The State Lands Commission has required
 the net power consumed to be "Carbon Neutral"
 CA Coastal Commission also requiring mitigation for potential
 impact on marine environment due to power plant once-through
 cooling system - CWA 316b issues
 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
  - Lower energy consumption from better membranes and
    Improved energy recovery devices
  - High efficiency pumps
  - Renewable energy sources - wind energy, solar
  - Carbon credits
  - Reforestation
  - CO2 Sequestration in Product Water
  - LEED "Green Building" Design
 Commitment to 57 acres of wetlands as Marine Mitigation
                                                  acciona
                                                ^-J       Agua

-------
        Commitment to Research
Desalination stakeholder community has
proposed a substantive road map for
desalination research
National Research Council's report,
Desalination - A National Perspective,
delineates a summary research Agenda:
 - Intake and discharge evaluations
 - Concentrate management and disposal
 - Entrainment and impingement issues
 - Water Quality Constituent Impacts
 - Energy Efficiency/Energy Recovery
 - Methods for Cost Reduction
                                    (dacciona
                                           Agua

-------
            Concluding Remarks
As low cost alternatives to seawater and
brackish water desalination diminish in the US,
we will see desalination properly valued -
reflecting supply, delivery, and water quality.
We can anticipate a continued struggle to accept
desalination into the portfolio of supply options
until stakeholders realize that proper pricing of
treated and desalinated water complements
water conservation and water reuse strategies.
We can expect SWRO and Brackish RO to
become 10% to 20% of the Regional Supply as
desal starts to take hold in areas such as Tampa
and in  El Paso
                                      (dacciona
                                            Agua

-------
           Concluding Remarks
Similar to incrementally more expensive
"green power" supply options, we can expect
the marginally more expensive desalination
supply costs to be amortized across a larger
supply base using either direct subsidy from
regional suppliers and or directly reflected in
user rates.
We can anticipate nominal technical
improvements offset by continued increases in
materials, component, and energy costs
As good planners, we should strive to properly
integrate desalination to complement existing
water resources and conservation rather than
waiting for a crisis to make decisions
                                     (dacciona
                                            Agua

-------
    Where Can I Find More Desal Information?
Water Desalination Report www.waterdesalreport.com
Global Water Intelligence  www.qlobalwaterintel.com
AEDYR (Spanish Desalination and Water Reuse
Association) www.aedyr.com
IDA  http://www.idadesal.org/t-dwr.aspx
AMTA www.membranes-amta.org
California Coastal Commission
http://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports
California State Lands Commission,
http://archives.slc.ca.gov/
National Academies Press
 - http://www.nap.edu/catalog php?record  id = 12184
                                           (dacciona
                                                   Agua

-------
 acciona
            Agua
Pioneers in development and sustainability
                 acciona
                ^J   Agua

-------
                   Desalination
Desalination Plant with Unique Methods in
                 FUKUOKA
               Mr. Akira Shimokawa
             Director, Facilities Division
        FUKUOKA District Waterworks Agency

-------

-------

-------
             Drought   experience
*2 times big drought experience
 (1978year 287 days,  1994year 295days)
:Every 2year cut the intake amount from the
mam river
* prediction of water demand increase

*Save water rules

*Develop water resource
   dams
   reclamation water
   desalination plant
                                     Water supply by tank in 1978

-------
UMINONAKAMICHI NATA SEA WATER DESALINATION PLANT

   PRODUCT CAPACITY  50,OOOm3/DAY (MAX)
   INTAKE SEA WATER VOLUME 103,OOOm3/DAY
   SITE AREA 46,000m2
   BUIDING AREA 16,000m2
   ELECTRIC DEMAND 12,OOOKW

-------
                Schematic Flow Diagram
Infiltration
 Intake
                                                                Slaked Lime
          Intaked
          Seawater
           Tant
                                    Product
                                   Water Tank
                Discharge
       Pelton Wheel

Effluent from Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant

-------
Unique method 1
Natural sand filter

-------
  Unique method 2
  UF membrane Pretreatment
 Conventional  dual media filter
UF membrane Pretreatment
  SWtype by NITTO DENKO
                                     Perfect removal of  turbidit
                                     Consistent low SDI
                                     Easy operation
                                     Easy maintenance
Reducing cleaning frequency

-------
Unique method 3
High recovery  RO module
     High pressure
     hollow-fiber
     membrane
     by TOYOBO
                                  60% recovery
                                  (desalinated  pure water)


                                  Save plant area

                                  Save  amount of  intake sea water

                                  Decrease  plant largeness
Decrease cost

-------
Unique  method 4
Secondly  low pressure  RO
                            Standard of
                           water quality
                                                            Boron
                                                          =<1.0mg/l
 Pure water after first
 High pressure RO
 Boron  4mg/l
Secondly low
pressure RO

Boron
=<1.5mg/l
Mix with
purified
river water

Boron =<1.0mg/l

-------
Unique method 5
Discharge Brine water
   HAKATA BAY
    SALT 3.5%
        SEWAGE
       TREATMENT
         PLANT
                        CONSENTRATED SEA
                              WATER
                               SALT 7%
                        GENKAI OPEN SEA

                                                                       '
                                       Water intake system
                  	
                                                                 (FukuokaCity)
         i ^Uminonakamichj Nata
discharge tank if Sea Water Desalination
           Center
 Discharge facilities
                                                                           Shi
                                             HAKATA BAY

-------
      PRIVATE COMPANY
    KYOWAKIDEN INDUSTRY
                                      MANAGEMENT
FUKUOKA DISTRICT
  WATERWARKS
    AGENCY
DESINE AND CONSTRUCTION
          OPERATE AND MAINTENANCE
        GUALANTEE  15YEARS

-------
     WATER  QUALITY  in  2007FY
Total Dissolved Solids
Chloride Ion
Sodium and its
compounds
Sulfate Ion
Hardness
Electric conductivity
Boron an its
compounds
water
40,200
20,300
10,800

6,580
51,700
4.5
desalted water
108
42.1
26.1
2.5
19.1
178
1.4
mixed water standard
138 =<500mg/l
32.0 =<200mg/l
23.7 =<200mg/l

50.5 =<300mg/l
225
0.61 =<1.0mg/l

-------
BoronCmg/L)
         30,000  40,000

1.6     '
                             Product  water quality
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
                                                     Seawatertemp.
                                                         (C)
uuu
*


n n™
i ffi
D C
on
n
D
n



ss
\


* *

n
D :
D D
n ° i
n
i 01
P D CD
: D D D
D nn
nnn p
DP
n
n



A.
AA
A
*


* *


n
SP
n
n
n
p nn
n nn
n n
Ci
n
n
A A
w
%
**M
*****


*

n
nn
n nn
D rTmnn
n n n n npz
n ii 1 1 nn n i n 1 1 m n i
nn n n p
	 n 	 n n n n n
n n rm DET n n on n
nn MM ri n n
D D DD
P P n
n n
n n
n n
n
n n
g
]
At
A
A
A
AA
4 A * "^ ^
A
1^ ^^^
V**^

ou.uuurn / q
*
max. allowable boron Conc[1.5mg/L]
n
p P
n n
n P nn nn n n
n n n p_ nn p rrn n
mn D DD D D D D DD D
D n n n n _n n _QP _p D CD CD rm m p
DDDH n n DD D D rri n D irm n n n n n n n n
mi i in n n n i mi i n on nn n n n nn p i HIM p
p P n n n nn PH nn n n rnn CD p n p c
p n n n nn P n p nn E
nnn n n n i r n n D mn n
D nnn n n
p n n n n
n P [m
n
n
p
n Boron Cone, of product water
r* • ^r
Sea water Temp.
A EC of product water
\
/ *^^%
-'^WA.. ^ ._ ,^.->.*A> T
A A

                                                                                        55
                                                                                          EC
                                                                                         MS/cm
                                                                                         40
                                                                                         35
                                                                                           400
                                                                                           350


                                                                                         30 300


                                                                                         25 250


                                                                                         20 200


                                                                                         15 150


                                                                                         10 100
   12/1    12/31    1/30     2/29
 2007year     2008year
3/30     4/29
                                            5/29
9/26     10/26    11/25

-------
   COST  ANALYSIS
   Personnel.
   Expenses
    77MY
     2%
Maintenance
  579MY
   19%
Chemicals
 52MY
     Electricity
      770MY
       25%
Total 3,133million yen
Unit cost 213yen/m3

(2007 fiscal year)
                          Depreciation
                            1,547MY
                             49%

-------
EFFECTIVE  USE of CONCENTRATED SEA WATER
   DESALINATION PLANT
 UNDER SURVEY
 *use for food (tofu,miso,soy
 sauce,bread)
 *thalassa therapy
 *bring up fish
 *penetrate pressure power
  lant etc.
NATUNAL SEA SALT

-------
EFFECTIVE  USE of pure water and others
                                           Bottled pure
                                           water
                                           Free distribution
                           Under survey
                           *reuse membrane
                           *selling bottled pure water

-------

-------
Pathogens/Microbes

-------
                  Pathogens/ Microbes
Detection Methods of Enteric Viruses in a Large
                 Volume of Water
                 Dr. Hiroyuki Katayama
     Associate Professor, Department of Urban Engineering
              Graduate School of Engineering
                   University of Tokyo

-------
Japan-US Joint Conference in Las Vegas                Mar 3-6, 2009
    Detection methods of enteric
 viruses in a large volume of water
                      ©  Katayama Hiroyuki
                      Ohgaki Shinichiro
      Department of Urban Engineering, University of Tokyo, Japan
                           Email: katayama@env.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
                                 X   \

-------
           Today's Topic
1. Importance of viruses in water safety
2. Literature review of virus concentration
  method
3. Development of a virus concentration
  method
4. Detection of viruses in a large volume of
  water

-------
1. Importance of viruses in water
            safety

-------
        Increase in a warm-blooded animal body
                  Hands
                              Water supply
                               Immune
                          system
Feces
 Sewer system
Wastewater Treatment
Flies
Foods
                  Water
Mouth
                        Heat
                  Water treatment
                    Diffuse and Decrease in Environment
     10io
                        10°
      Life cycle of pathogens of Fecal-oral infection

-------
              Enteric Viruses
cp20 ~ 100nm in size, RNA or DMA coated with protein
Propagate in animal intestine, emitted as feaces
More than 100 types identified human as a host.
Symptoms:   Diarrhea, Vomit, fever, head ache, (Hepatitis, paralysis)
Route of Infection : Food
                             ng ,
                 Contact with infected individual
    Enterovirus
Adenovirus
Norovirus

-------
2. Literature review of virus
  concentration method

-------
History of Virus Concentration

      Method from Water

Pad method
 • Dipping a pad in water overnight, recover
  viruses adsorbed on the pad.
Negatively charged membrane method
Wallisetal., 1967
 • Viruses are adsorbed onto negatively charged
  membrane under 25-50mM Mg2+ condition,
  then eluted with beef extract solution pH 9.5
 • Volume of water increased, known amount.


-------
               Cont'd

Negatively charged membrane method
using acid in place of Mg2+ (Sobsey et al.,
1973).
Positively charged membrane method
(Sobsey etal., 1979)
 • Viruses adsorbed to positive charged
  membrane without addition of either Mg or
  acid.
 • Viruses are eluted with beef extract solution.


-------
  Adsorption to Elution from

Cellulose coagulation method (Yano et a/.,
1993)
Glass wool and glass powder are also used as
the adsorbent of viruses.
Membranes are also used as the adsorbent.

-------
          Elution of viruses

4> Beef extract solution ( 3% N 1 % ) pH 9 ~
  11
  • Sometimes glycine buffer
  Based on adsorption due to hydrophobia
  interaction.
  Extracting viruses by competition of site
  with viruses.
  Good for following cultivation with
  mammalian cell.


-------
  Mechanism of adsorption and

       desorption of viruses

Applied and Theoretical aspects of Virus
Adsorption to Surfaces (Gerba C.P. 1984)
 • Hydrophobic interaction for elution of viruses
   • Competitive extraction with beef extract
 • Electrostatic interaction for adsorption of viruses
   • Under neutral pH condition, viruses are negatively
    charged.
   • Viruses are positively charged under acid condition
   • Multivalent cation can change the surface charge of
    viruses

-------
Reconcentration and  purification
  Acid precipitation for beef extract eluate
  (Katzenelson et al., 1976)
  PEG precipitation
  Pro-Cipitate for selective precipitation of viruses.
  Ultrafiltration method usign centrifugation
  Fleon/chloroform purification
  Gel filtration  ( Sephadex, or Sephacryl)
  Antigen-antibody purification method


-------
      Needs of new virus
     concentration method
Inhibitory effect of beef extract eluate on
PCR detection of viruses.
Inorganic eluant for following detection of
PCR.
Electrostatic interaction should be
considered.
 • Resulted in good recovery from seawater


-------
 3, Development of a virus
    concentration  method
and Its Application to Detection of Enterovirus
 and Norwalk Virus from Coastal Seawater
 Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68: 1033-1039,
                2002.
                           X  \
                                      14

-------
     State of the art of virus

     concentration  methods

Adsorption is easy, elution is difficult
Lack of consideration of following virus
detection by PCR
 • More severe condition can be applicable
  because of no need of maintaining virus
  culturability.
 • Avoid use of beef extract due to inhibitory
  effect on PCR
 • New acid or alkali condition for elution from
  membrane?


-------
   New Virus Concentration Method
       Sample        Acid rinse,     Alkaline elution
       (+Mg2+, 25mM)  pH 3.0(H2SO4)  pH 10.5(NaOH)
                      200ml          5ml
Negatively-char
membrane
Millipore HA,
pore size 0.45mm,
diameter 47|um
o o
                                  Neutralization with
                                  Cone. TE buffer 0.05ml
                                  and H2SO4 0.025ml

Katayama et al., 2002, Appl. and Environ. Microbiol., 68: 1033-103.

-------
    How acid rinse works?
Adsorption
                         f   I 9 \ membrane
                     Virus   A  X
                         Cation
Acid rinse
                     Virus
Alkarine Elution
                    Virus

-------
Recovery ( % )



Pure
water
Sea
water
Virus
type

Qp
Polio
Qp
Polio
+ve
filter
(1MDS)
No
40
50
0
6
-ve filter
( Millipore HA, 0.45um )
Beef extract
Acid
9
83
4
94
no
0
79
7
42
NaOH
Acid
35
95

89
no
3.9
33

38


-------
   Improvement of the virus

     concentration method
Pretreatment of membrane with AICI3, for
the membrane positively charged.
 • Pre-sorption of A] enable viruses adsorb onto
  the membrane without addition of Mg.
 • Acid rinse works in a same manner as Mg
  method.
Modification for field survey.
 • Concentrate viruses outside of laboratory.
Increase the area of the membrane
 • Disk filter to cartridge filter.


-------
                     Pre-sorption of Al
1.AI3+   Sorption on Membrane   2. Virus Adsorption
                                       Sample

          :©,;-
                                                    Repulsive
                                                    interaction
       Al3
             ®
                     Millipore HA       Virus
                  L ( pore 0.45|jm ) Negatively charged
3.  Acid rinse to remove AI3+       4.  Elution of Virus in Alkali
\
  H2SO4 ( pH 3.0 )
NaOH ( pH 10.5 )
                   positively
                   charged to
                   attach directly
                   to membrane
        Repulsiv
        iteracti
     ©

                                            Concentrate

-------
  Other methods developed

Cultivate viruses without elution from
membrane
 • Coliphage detection (Sobsey et al., 1995)
   • on host bacteria E. coli.
 • Enteric virus detection (Papageorgiou et al.,
  2000)
   • on mammalian cell layer
Concentrate viruses, bacteria and
protozoa at once by UF (Hill et al., 2007)
 • PCR inhibition is problem


-------
   Research  work of Katayama's
   Development of virus concentration method from water
   (Katayama et al., Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68: 1033-1039, 2002)
+  Field survey
   •  Tap Water and river Water ( Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 2154-
      2160,2004. )
   •  River in Tokyo  ( Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71 (5):2403-2411,2005. )
   •  Tokyo bay area ( Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68: 1033-1039, 2002,
      Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, Vol 4, No 2 pp73-77, 2004. )
   •  Combined sewer overflow at storm rain ( CSO) ( water science &
      Technology Vo\ 50 No 1 pp 259-262, 2004. )
   •  Southeast Asian Water Environment  ( water science & Technology vo\ 54
      No 3 pp 203-210, 2006. )
   •  Wastewater treatment plants in Japan (  Water Research, 42:1441 -
      1448,2008 )
                                                             22

-------
4. Detection of viruses in a large

          volume of water



    Occurrence of Norovirus genomes in

           Tap water in Tokyo
    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 2154-2160,
                  2004
X  \
                                       23

-------
 Outline of Tap Water Survey

Sample Volume: 100-500 L
98 samples
from January 2002 to February 2003
All the concentrate was subjected for virus
detection (9 portion each).
Virus genome was detected by real time
PCR.
                                  24

-------
Noroviruses were found in  Tokyo
                 tap water
Season
Spring
(Mar-May)
Summer
(Jun-Aug)
Autumn
(Sep-Nov)
Winter
(Dec-Feb)
Total
Positive/tested
NV-G1
0/29
(0.0%)
1/18
(5.6%)
0/19
(0.0%)
3/32
(9.4%)
4/98
(4.1%)
NV-G2
3/29
(10.3%)
0/18
(0.0%)
3/19
(15.8%)
1/32
(3.1%)
7/98
(7.1%)
                          Norovirus genome was
                          detected from tap water in
                          Tokyo.

                          PCR tubes were never opened
                          to prevent carry-over
                          contamination.

                          Average concentration should
                          be 1 genome/2800L.

                          Infectious risk was calculated to
                          be 1 infection / 200 people-year
                          in the worst scenario, though
                          there are a lot of unknown
                          factors.


-------
    Norovirus concentration in Japan
                    E. co//
                  (CFU/ml)
             NV
          (PDU/
Tap water
 0
         10'6 5
Raw sewage
 105
         10s±i
Treated
wastewater
 103
Coastal seawater
101±
1
10
-2+2

-------
Virus concentration in wastewater
       in Asian countries


Japan
(sewage)
Beijing, China
(sewage)
Ho Chiminh,
Viet nam
(canal)
Jakarta,
Indonesia
(Flood
water)
(CFU/mL)
E. coli
105
104'5
103
104
(PDU/mL)
NVG1
1Q2-4
1Q2-3
101
io-1
NV
G2
1Q2-4
1Q2-4
10o-i
101
AdV
1Q3-4
1Q2-3
1Q1-2
102
EV
1Q2-3
102
1Q1-2
101
HAV
0
some
0
102
27

-------
       Transport of Pathogen via Water
   -Comprehensive Approach for Risk Management-
|Y  Monitoring
From Upstream
Risk from drinking water
    By human,
    from human
               WTP   —
Barrier agains
Pathogens
                 WWTP
                                      Recreational activity
                                Risks via fishery


-------
                  Pathogens/ Microbes
   Future Directions for Monitoring Pathogen
Indicators/Surrogates: Linkages to Water Quality
   Management and Public Health Protection
                  Dr. Audrey Levine
        National Program Director for Drinking Water
            Office of Research and Development
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
£EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
 Future Directions for Monitoring Pathogen
             Indicators/Surrogates:
 Linkages to water quality management and
    I      public health protection
             Dr. Audrey D.  Levine, P.E.
    National Program Director for Drinking Water Research
  Office of Research and Development
  National Program for Drinking Water Research
Treasure Island Hotel, Las Vegas, NV
       March 4, 2009

-------
xvEPA
         DRINKING WATER RESEARCH PROGRAM
Monitoring  pathogens and  indicators
  Goals
   • Public Health protection
   • Water quality management
   • Regulatory compliance/oversight
  Context
   • Drinking water
   • Discharge permits
   • Storm water
   • Recreational water
  Future directions to link monitoring and
  monitoring with public health protection and
  water quality management

-------
oEPA
DRINKING  WATER RESEARCH  PROGRAM
    Monitoring  goals and challenges
   1  Goals
      • Rapid, low-cost detection of potential health threats
      • Ability to develop timely response
          •  Identify source
          •  Develop and implement risk management strategy
   1  Challenges for monitoring pathogens
      • Wide array of potential pathogens
      • Detection limits
      • Costs, Turn-around time
     Challenges for monitoring indicators
      • Lack of direct correlation with pathogens
          •  Occurrence, concentration
          •  Viability, infectivity
          •  Health risks
      • Fate/transport mechanisms
                                    Campylobacterjejuni

-------
oEPA
DRINKING WATER RESEARCH PROGRAM
 Trends in waterborne disease outbreaks associated with
          United States drinking water 1971-2006
    o
     1971  1974 1977  1980 1983  1986 1989  1992 1995  1998 2001  2004
        Parasitic
        Unidentified
                  Year

         Bacterial     D Viral        D Chemical
         Legionella spp. ^ Mixed agents
     Yoder JS etal. 2008. MMWR 57(SS-9):39-69.

-------
 oEPA
DRINKING WATER RESEARCH PROGRAM
2 year period
65 outbreaks
2536 people sick
8 deaths
(Naegleria
fowleri)
Dominant agents:
Cryptosporidium,
toxigenie E. coli,
noroviruses
                       Recreational Water Outbreaks
                     20fiT
                          No. of   No. ol
                          oubreaks 8tates
    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/SS/SS5308.pdf

-------
   £EPA
     United States
     Environmental Protection
     Agency
  Pathogens associated
with waterborne disease
    Fewer than 1 % of enteric pathogens have been cultivated and studied
  Bacteria
 Strep, pyogenes
   cysts
 Fazio and Fishchetti
   ruses
                             n
                                      Free-living
                                      amoebae
  Polio virus
Williams, USEPA
Cryptospohdium parvum
     oocysts
  Lindquist, USEPA
Giardia lamblia
   cysts
Lindquist,USEPA
   Hi effects include acute AGI; urinary tract, eye, skin, ear, or respiratory infections
Norovirus—highly infectious, resistant to chlorine

-------
oEPA
DRINKING WATER RESEARCH PROGRAM
   Indicator Organisms
  Types and concentrations vary with
  source, hydrology, land-use, season,
  weather, etc.
  Sources          • •*, •      -*
                    N  $*•«*•*%•*
   •  Wastewater       •& ^
   •  Stormwater
   •  Stagnant water
   •  Soil
   •  Sediments
   •  Warm-blooded animals
x*'  ^--   -Ji
  1 %—-^'
   ^ : -• s^
^   ; jisfr. - \
                   *'

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency	
Bacterial  Indicators
Indicator
 Characteristics
 Growth
 conditions
 Size,
 jim
Application
Total coliform
Escherichia, Klebsiella.
Citrobacter, Enterobacter
Fecal coliform
Escherichia, Klebsiella
 Rod shaped;
 Gram negative;
 non-spore
 forming
 Facultative
 anaerobe
 0.5 to 2
Drinking
Water (TCR)
NPDES,
TMDLs,
Reclaimed
water,
Shellfish
Enterococci
E. faecalis,E.faecium
 Cocci,
 Gram positive,
 non-spore
 forming
Aerotolerant
anaerobe
 0.5 to 1
Recreational
water
Clostridium
perfringens
Opportunistic pathogen
 Rod shaped,
 Gram positive,
 spore forming
 Obligate
 anaerobe
0.6 to 1.3Potential
   by   surrogate for
2.4 to 19Protozoan
        pathogens

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection
   Agency	
 Viral Indicators
Indicator
 Characteristics
Host
Size,
 nm
Application
Enteroviruses
Genus within the family
Picornaviridae includes
poliovirus,
coxsackievirus,
echovirus, etc.
No cell wall;
Non-enveloped protein
Icosahedral capsid
Single strand (ss) RNA
genome
Human
 25-     Periodic
 30    monitoring
           for
        reclaimed
          water
Coliphages
 Somatic and male-
 specific viruses
 Icosahedral protein
 shell
E. co//.
and other
coliform
bacteria
 25       Virus
      surrogate for
        UV testing

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
Applications for
pathogen/indicator monitoring
 Source Water Protection  ,
  -Prevalence/persistence of
   pathogens
  -Effectiveness of
   management practices
  -Permitting
  -Source tracking
 Treatment
  -Treatment efficacy
  -Optimization of disinfection
  -Monitoring approaches to
   ensure safe drinking water
              Distribution systems
               -Role of biofilms, inorganic
                deposits, particles
               -Effectiveness of disinfectant
                residuals
               -Effect of hydraulics and
                water age on pathogen
                survival
               -Intrusion, pipeline integrity
               -Free-living amoebae

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
   Research focus for
pathogens and indicators
    Screenin
     Indicators
    Occurrence
    Prioritization
                  Sample
                 Collection
                    and
                 Processing
        I
                             Measurement
               Virulence, Infectivity,
                   Exposure,
                 Dose-Response,
                  Health Effects

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
&EPA       Research activities on
              pathogen detection
  Sample handling and processing
  Potential interferences
  -Microbial
  -Chemical: Salts, Metals, Organics
  -Particulate matter (organic, inorganic, nanoparticles)
  Analytical issues
  -Viability/I nfectivity
  -Detection  limits
  -Relationship to indicators (microbial, chemical)
  -Simultaneous detection of multiple pathogens
  -Rapid turn-around time

-------
&EPA   Molecular Detection  coupled
             with viability evaluation
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
  ^Molecular methods
     •PCR/qPCR: PCR-based amplification detection assays fora
     wide variety of organisms
     •Mic roar rays: Microarrays for typing and for multiple pathogen
     detection.
     •Proteomics: MALDI-TOF analysis for typing and
     characterization.
  'Viability
     •Bacterial culture methods.
     • Viable viruses and
     •Protozoan parasites.
  integrated Cell Culture/PCR and enrichments
     •Cell culture enrichments for viable organisms
     •Strategic use of pretreatments to limit PCR amplification by
     non-viable organisms.

-------
&EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
Integrated Cell Culture/RT-
PCR Method
       -;' ' :f\ ' /'  I Tl-t ; >-V"- C.-rT'i
       ,>,0^:. . V <.:%{&•
                               Sample Collection
                                  & Elution
                                  oncentrauon
                                 Tissue Culture

-------
   £EPA
      United States
      Environmental Protection
      Agency
   Proteomics for Better Pathogen Characterization_

 MAUD I-MS was used to create a mass spectral fingerprint (3000 m/z-30,000 mfz) for each
 strain/isolate studied.  The mass values observed were used to differentiate between the
 species of Aeromonas as well as other related genera (Vibrio and Piesiomonas). This
 comparison is possible because different species of bacteria express different proteins. Below
 is an example of the spectra observed for different microorganisms.

  Microorganisms
Spectra
             &
, .,!,.
1
A
                                                                      B
                       MALDI-MS
                                         5000   10OOO  1SOO€   2OOOO  25000
                                                      m/z
NERL Project-Dr. Maura Donohue

-------
xvEPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
Exposure analysis using
Micro bead immunoassay
1. Microscopic beads are coated with
one specific protein (Cryptosporidium,
norovirus or rotavirus)
                2. Saliva samples are incubated
                with beads in microplate wells;
                salivary antibodies react with the
                protein
                3. Samples are incubated
                with labeled anti-human
                detection antibody

-------
£EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection
  Agency
Oral fluid sampling
    Oracol™ oral fluid samplers
    Immunoglobin responses (IgA, IgG and IgM) to
    Cryptosporidum, norovirus and rotavirus
    Sharp increase in antibody (immunoconversion)
    indicates infection during a specific month

-------
  £EPA
Source tracking  approaches
     United States
     Environmental Protection
     Agency
                Phylogenetic Analysis: > 2500 clones
    Automated Sequencing
Confirm inserts using Ml3 primers
               Cloning
    Ligation of PCR products to vector and
  3 transformation of plasmid into £.
            competent cells
                                           Sample collection and filtration (5L) of
                                                      water samples
                                                         Extract total DNA
                                                      from polycarbonate filters
                                Universal Primers
                                (8F and 787R)

-------
            DRINKING  WATER RESEARCH PROGRAM
 Draft Contaminant Candidate List microbes
 BACTERIA
  • Campylobacter jejuni
  • Escherichia coli (0157)
  • Helicobacter pylori
  • Legionella pneumophila
  • Salmonella enterica
  • Shigella sonnei
  • Mycobacterium avium
VIRUSES
 •  Caliciviruses (includes
   norovirus,sapovirus)
 •  Hepatitis A virus
 •  Entero virus
PROTOZOA
 •  Entamoeba histolytica
 •  Naegleria fowleri
Regulatory Decision Criteria:
•Occurrence
•Health Effects
•Policy, Regulation, or Risk Management Opportunities
                                               http://www.epa.gov/nerlcwww/
                                               graphics/norwalk.jpg

-------
&EPA
Comparison of a qPCR and Culture Method
                for Enterococcus
                Real Time PCR vs. Culture Based Fecal
                  Indicator Bacteria Measurements
                           to Determine
                        Beach Water Quality
    Pathogens too diluted
    & varied to measure
    at beach. Indicator
    bacteria still measurable.
                      Filter
                      Water Sample
                     BE^B
                 Grow Indicators
                 on Filter Membranes
      Count indicator colonies on T
      filter to determine water quality.
                24 Hours
                               X"\
                                         Cti
                  *Q Filter
                    Water Sample
                        .) Extract DMA
                         from Filter
                                                  Pathogen (virus,
                                                  parasite,or bacteria)
                                                  Indicator
                                                  (fecal bacteria)
                               )Amplify& measure
                               indicator DMA by PCR
                               to determine water quality.
uiii v.ri
.vi'
• — ", ,— ~
.ii.ir
—7",
•a:a yiji

I

                                                                       11 '2 II « 1=3 a 22 2-1 26
                                                                            fajn
                                                           2 Hours

-------
xvEPA
         DRINKING WATER RESEARCH PROGRAM
Conclusions

• Tools and methods are evolving to
  better link monitoring approaches for
  pathogens and indicators to public
  health protection and water quality
  monitoring
• Future directions will build upon
  historical approaches and provide
  opportunities for more comprehensive
  characterization of sources of
  microbial contaminants, impacts of
  risk management

-------
                   Pathogens/ Microbes
Research for Pathogens in Water Environment and
         the Countermeasures in Sewerage
                  Mr. Seiichiro Okamoto
            Team Leader, Recycling Research Team
      Material and Geotechnical Engineering Research Group
               Public Works Research Institute

-------
 5th Japan - U.S. Joint Conference on Drinking Water Quality Management
 and Wastewater Control
             March 2-5, 2009

Research for Pathogens in

Water Environment and

the Countermeasures in Sewerage
             Seiichiro Okamoto

              Recycling Research Team

              Public Works Research Institute

-------
Research for Pathogens in Water Environment and the Countermeasures in Sewerage
Outline                                ~
  Background
  Study of cryptosporidium measures in
  sewage systems
  State of norovirus (NV) in wastewater, treated
  wastewater and river water
  Characteristics of removal of NV from
  wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)

-------
State of infectious diseases caused
by pathogens in Japan
  In Japan, cryptosporidium, norovirus, and
  other antibiotic resistant bacteria cause
  frequent infectious diseases
  a cryptosporidium outbreak in Ogose town (JPN)
    (1996)
    •  More than 9,000 people were infected
  a Spread of norovirus (NV) nationwide in recent
    years
      First in terms of food poisoning cases (2006)
    •  Second in number of cases (2006)

-------
Cryptosporidiosis outbreak in Ogose  £
town (1996)

• A large-scale outbreak caused 9,000 people
  to suffer from diarrhea and stomach pain.
• Cryptosporidium gets mixed with the tap
  water from the contaminated river water.
• There was a wastewater treatment facility
  upstream from water intake.
• Cryptosporidium propagated in the water
  cycle (wastewater - Intake ) .

-------
Study of cryptosporidium measures
for sewage systems

• In response to Ogose outbreak,
  cryptosporidium for sewage systems were
  also studied.
• The Study Committee on cryptosporidium in
  Sewage Systems completed and announced
  its final report (2000)

-------
Study of cryptosporidium measures
for sewage systems
cryptosporidm
 Adding flocculant
     (10mg/L)
   1/1000 of the
   concentration
(activated sludge treatment)
Outline of the final report
• State of cryptosporidium concentration/
  in wastewater and treated wastewater
• Evaluation of cryptosporidium removaT
  effectiveness of the wastewater and sludge treatment
  processes
• Methods of measures for cryptosporidium in sewage
  systems
   a Ensuring safety of water bodies receiving effluent of treated
     wastewater (normal times and during an outbreak)
   a Ensuring safety of sewage system employees

-------
State of norovirus (NV)
in river water, waste water and
treated wastewater

-------
  Food poisoning caused by NV
• In Japan, food poisoning caused by NV is the leading
cause: 27,616 patients out of total of 39,026 patients (71.0%)
• Of a total of 1,491 outbreaks, 449 outbreaks (33.5%),
second to campylobacterjejuni/campylobactercoli ( 645
outbreaks )

Occurrence during the past 6 years.

Total outbreaks
Total patients
Fatalities
2001
269
7,358
0
2002
268
7,961
0
2003
278
10,603
0
2004
277
12,537
0
2005
274
8,727
0
2006
499
27,616
0
(Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare Web Site: quoted from norovirus Questions and Answers )

-------
Characteristics of NV
  An extremely small round structured virus
  with diameter of about 38nm, discovered in
  victims of a 1968 gastroenteritis epidemic
  Heating at 60°C for 30 minutes does not
  destroy its infectiousness.
  Its genotypes are classified as G1 and G2,
  which are communicated to people.
  It cannot be detected by the cell culture
  method.  ^ difficult to judge the activity

-------
Characteristics of NV (cont'd)
  Symptoms continue for only 1 to 3 days, but
  include violent vomiting, and  later diarrhea
  and fever etc.
  It is known to be a virus which is a major
  cause of food poisoning and gastroenteritis
  through raw oysters (now rare) in the winter
  In recent years, a high percentage of cases
  have been caused by person to person
  infection.
                                         10

-------
NV measurement method:
 Why the real time PCR method?
 cell culture method
 a impossible to measure the infectious capacity of NV
 electronic microscope, antigen-antibody reaction
 a sensitivity is low and quantitative evaluation is impossible
 methods of rapidly and easily detecting and measuring
 it with high sensitivity should be developed.

-------
   Real time PCR equipment
   Real time PCR —
     Technology which amplifies, monitors in real time, and
     analyzes (quantifies) a specified gene
   (Benefits)
     (1) Can accurately quantify a specified gene.
     (2) Can perform analysis quickly and easily.
  	 Example of a real time PCR System  	
Applied Biosystems 7500
LightCycler
Smart Cycler

-------
Procedure for quantification
        concentration
- negatively charged membrane

"polyethylene glycol (PEG)
     extract RNA, refine
 reverse transcriptase reaction
 convert the RNA to DMA
 real time PCR (quantification)
 amplifies and quantifies
 a specified gene
                                                  13

-------
State of NV in river water
 - Example of a survey  by the PWRI -
 The coverage ratio of sewage
 systems varied between the rivers
 a  At NT2, the coverage ratio of sewage
    systems is almost 100 %, and the
    river water is mainly spring water.
 a  At OT2 and OT5, the  coverage ratio is •
    low and domestic wastewater is
    treated in septic tanks then
    discharged  into the river
 Every six hours, water was sampled
 from 3 small rivers then analyzed
Teganuma Marsh
 (Chiba pref.)
  Flush toilet wastewater
  treatment tank
 D individual sewage treatment
  tank
 D Night soil treatment plant
                        Teganuma Marsh
                         (Chiba pref.)
                                                          14

-------
                                                   Ife
State of NV in river water
 - Example of a survey by the PWRI -

  During the non-epidemic period (July), both G1 and G2 were
  below the quantification limits (3.8 x 103 copies/L )
  During the epidemic period (Jan.) both G1 and G2 were
  detected at concentrations of 105 copies/L at OT2.
  The detected concentration varies greatly between the
  epidemic and non-epidemic periods
NV (copies/L)
                    cryptosporidium, giardia (numbers/L)
             E. coli (cfu/mL)
Name Date / time
norovirus
G1
OTZ 7/10 9:00 N. D.
_ Quantification limit '< ;-:nn:-;
OTZ 1 22
1/22
1/22
1/23
TJT^
NT2
1/22
1/22
1/23
1/23
1/22
1 /22
1/23
1/23
9:00
15:00
21:00
3:00
12:00
18:00
0:00
6:00
13:10
19:00
t:00
6:40
3. 1E+05
2. 3E+05
4. 2E+05
1 . QE+05
N. D
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
norovirus
G2
N. D.
3 BF+03
3. 1E+05
1.3E+Q5
3.3E+05
1 . 6E+05
^^^K
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
                   t Name Date / time crypto-
                   I         sporidium
                                   giardia
           Name  Date / time
                 E. coli
OTZ
OT5
I, 22
1/22
1/22
1/23
1/22
1/22
1/23
1/23
9:00
15:00
21:00
3:00
12:00
18:00
0:00
6:00
N.
N
N
N.
N,
N.
N.
N.
D.
D
D.
D.
D.
D.
D
D.
5. OE-02
N. D.
5. OE-02
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
                    NTZ
                       1/22  13:10
                       1/22  19:00
                       1/23  1:00
                       1/23  6:40
N. D
N. D.
N. D
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
N. D.
OTZ
OT5
NTZ
1 ,22
1/22
1/22
1/23
1 - 22
1/22
1/23
1/23
1/22
1/22
1/23
1 ; 23
9:00
15:00
21:00
3:00
12:00
18:00
0:00
6:00
13:10
19:00
1:00
6:40
8.0E+01
7. OE+01
8. OE+01
5.0E+01
9 OE+00
1.8E+01
1.0E+01
3 OE+OO
2. OE+01
8. OE+01
1.8E+02
4. OE+01

-------
 Relationship of NV with chemical 4j*


 markers


 •  A correlation of NV with caffeine and total sterol

   a  Correlation coefficients for G1 are 0.86 and 0.73 for caffeine and total sterol
     respectively , and for G2, 0.80 and 0.67 for caffeine and total sterol respectively

   The NV concentration can be estimated based on the

   concentrations of the chemical markers: caffeine and total

   sterol.    (h During the epidemic period
o

(U
-I— •
(/)


"CD
-I— •
o
il
CD

O
        10
  10°  1CT  10"


NV(G1)copies/L
10C
107
                     O)
                     c



                     "o

                     Q)

                     "oo
                     £
                     CD

                     O
10
 10°  10"  10°


NV (G2) copies/L
106  107

-------
NV Removal Tests
 at the Pilot Plant
  Continuous removal test of the activated
  sludge treatment method
  a A pilot plant consisting of an aeration tank
   (capacity 100 L) and primary and secondary
   sedimentation tanks (capacities 50 L) etc. was
   used for the tests.
                                        17

-------
 NV Removal  Tests
  at the Pilot Plant
Influent wastewater was
 supplied continuously
     primary
     clarifier
Chemical added (poly-aluminum
chloride (PAC)), at a rate of 5 and
10mg-AL/L (System 1)

              Secondary
         v   clarifier
                 Aeration tank
  Sampling
  point
  MLSS  2,000 mg/L
  HRT   8 hours
  - Activated sludge method with
  chemical addition (System 1)
  - Standard activated sludge
  method (System 2)
         filtration rate : 200m/day

         - Sand filtration (Run1)

         - Sand filtration with
         chemical addition (Run2)
Sampling
point
       Secondary
       effluent
                                       Sand
                                       filtration
                                       I
                    Sampling
                    point
      PAC added at a rate of
      3mg-AL/L (Run 2)
                     Schematic of the Pilot Plant

-------
 Results of testing
    Changes of NV concentration

    (measures of NV started in late December)

    Quantity of PAC added increased from 5 mg/L to 10

    mg/L (System I)
 _
o
o
o
o
 1.E+08
 1.E+07
 1.E+06
 (1.E+05
 1.E+04
> 1.E+03
 1.E+02
   Dec.20    Jan. 10   Jan. 31    Feb. 21   Mar. 13


       Changing NV (G1) concentration
                               1.E+08
                               1 .E+02
Dec.20    Jan. 10   Jan. 31    Feb. 21   Mar.


     Changing NV (G2) concentration
                                                         19

-------
Results Of testing  (removal rates)
   Standard activated sludge treatment
   — removal rate from 0.6 log to 2.1 log

   Chemical addition (10mg-AI/L)
   — removal rate rose to about 3 log
13

                            O
                            CM
                            C3

J] Chemical
addition
^Standard



-





\
•
•
•
•.
\
•.





1
AL 5mg/L * ' *
:|TT
:
.*
\

•:.
•-... Ul


i
•
\
\
*.


:
:
f
:
;
L111J'
=



i


•J
r-.

|
NV (G2)
AL
""""im


"• • 	 IU


10mg/L
\

/
/



m\


\



;
:
•
;
.*
:
:
;

/







  Dec.26   Jan. 17  J?n__29  Feb. 14   Feb. 28

   Effect of NV (G1) removal by chemical addition

                             0
                              Dec.26   Jan. 17   Jan. 29  Feb. 14  Feb. 28

                              Effect of NV (G2) removal by chemical addition
                                                   20

-------
Improving NV removal
effectiveness by sand filtration
  Sand filtration at filtration rate of 200 m/day achieved G2
  removal of 0.6 log (74%)
  Sand filtration with chemical addition (3 mg-AL/L)
  achieved removal rate from 1 .4 to 2.4 log or higher
  Addition of PAC achieved removal rate from 1 .4 log to
  2.4 log.

Sand filtration
(Run 1)
Sand filtration with
chemical addition
(Run 2)
removal rates ( log )
NV ( G1 )
0.05
1.4-2.7
NV ( G2 )
0.6
1.9 -2.4 or higher
Average removal rate (%)
Turbidity
90
98
SS
79
96
E. Coli
74
99
                                             21

-------
Conclusion
(Removal tests at the Pilot Plant)
 a The NV concentration in influent wastewater was 106
   to 107 copies/L

 The NV removal rates
 a Activated sludge method — 0.6 log to 2.1 log.
 a Activated sludge with chemical addition
                	0.6 log to 2.9 log (5 mg-AL/L)
                	2.1 log to 3.5 log (10 mg-AL/L)
 a Sand filtration — about 0.6 log (G2)
 a Sand filtration with chemical addition (3 mg-AL/L)
                	1.4 log to 2.4 log
                                               22

-------
Future challenges
  In Japan there are no final effluent standards for
  viruses in sewage systems.
  a Present detection methods cannot quantitatively
    detect the presence or absence of pollutants.
  a The state of viruses in wastewater and in treated
    wastewater are not fully understood.

  The MLIT* established the Study Committee on
  viruses in Sewage Systems (2008)
  a To perform studies focused on the preparation of
    guidelines concerning NV removal technologies etc.

        *MLIT : Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
                                                 23

-------
Future survey challenges
                  ft
  Clarifying the state of pathogens
  surveys of the removal of p
  wastewater treatment plants
  Evaluations of/cne safety pf \
  risk evaluation/method.
   Disinfection
   diactivates NV?
          and conduct
      hogens in

      iruses using the
 Combined Sewer
 Overflows (CSOs)

concentration of NV?
                                          24

-------
Research for Pathogens in Water Environment and
the Countermeasures in Sewerage
      Thank you
         for ygur kind attention

-------
                     Pathogens/ Microbes
Future Design Techniques for Chemical Disinfection
                      Dr. Charles N. Haas
        LD Betz Professor of Environmental Engineering, and
    Head, Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering Dept.
                       Drexel University

-------
              *

         Betz Professor of

   ^yironmental Engineering

Dept. of Civil. Architectural an
vZrffi     'i^??%
-------
Outline
  Continuing motivation for better
  methods for design
  Historical evolution of design methods
  Vision for future framework
  What we have and what we need

-------
         Motivation
DBP/Recalcitrant
pathogens (water
 ^Balancing for
  competing risks
 ^Rational design to
  meet multiple
  criteria
Wastewater
 ^Balancing for
  ecological effects
  (as well as DBFs)
                     microbial
      process
       cost
     byproduct
       risk
ismtection Level

-------
Disinfection 0  (1820's-
               1900)
 Miasmatic Theory
 Dose for deodorization
 fc Averill (1832) -"When it is
   desirable to destroy the
   effluvia from drains, &c, or
   to purify the water of a
   cistern—dissolve about eight
   ounces of the chloride of
   lime in a  pail full of water,
   and disperse it into them.
   Repeat the operation until
   the object is effected/'
  -  5  g/L

-------
     Disinfection   1   (1900
                        1930's)
 Dose to  give  inactivation  (some
 realization  of demand, timp^i
 1900-1930's
 fc Hooker(1913)
"The exact amounts of chloride of lime
required for water from different
sources, etc., vary considerably.  The
average quantity employed in most
cases lies between 5 and 12 Ibs.  per
million gallons of water... Even larger
quantities  up to 25 Ibs.  have been
employed."

Ca   0.5-3   mg/L
   AN INVESTIGATION OF THE LAWS
         OF DISINFECTION.

      BY HARRIETTE CHICK, D.So. LONDON.
  Jennff Research St'udent, Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.

           INTRODUCTION,

 THE work of Pasteur, showing the action of preservatives to be due
to their toxic effect upon micro-organisms, and the extension of the same
explanation, by the work of Lister, to cover the case of disinfectants and
disease germs, was followed by a considerable amount of successful work
dealing with the disinfectant action of vast numbers of substances upon
putrefying matter. (Buchholtz 1875 ; Jalan de la Croix 1881.)
 Robert Koch (1886), however, is responsible for the first systematic
experiments on disinfection, using pure cultures of bacteria. By
means of his " thread" method he investigated the effect on anthrax
spores of the then popular disinfectants, carbolic acid and sulphur dioxide,
and of many substances previously uninvestigated. He confirmed
previous work, demonstrating the powerful disinfectant, and even
greater antiseptic, properties of mercuric chloride, and the great
reputation of this salt may be said to date  from these experiments.
 Shortly afterwards much interest was excited by the appearance of
the first of many emulsified disinfectants, creolin, and thin substance
-was investigated by many contributors to the study of disinfection, e.g.t
Esmarch (1887) working with putrefying liquids, and Henle (1889), who
worked with cholera and typhoid. The latter also showed that creolin
contained higher homologues of phenol (crcsols, etc.) which, themselves
only slightly soluble in water, are conveniently emulsified by the
adfci&n of soap; these higher phenols are  at the same time more
powerful disinfectants and less poisonous than  carbolic acid. Fraenkel
(1889) showed that the extra disinfecting power of crude over pure
carbolic acid was due also to the admixture of higher phenols; he

-------
  Disinfection 2 (1930's-
               1970's)
 Application of  kinetic theories,
 dependency on demand, temperature
New England Water Works Association
          ORGANIZED 1882
IVoL. LXI
DECEMBER, 1947
| Mir Association, al a badi, ii no: rtlfomible for Me llatentnU it opinion! at «r "I "'




   THE DYNAMICS OF WATER CHLORINATION*


 BY GORDON M. FAIR.t J. CARRELL MORRIS^ AND SHIH LU CHANG**

          \.Ktad September 16, 1947.]
                                Time Killed Not Killed
                                15 min
                                SO nil
                                45 min
                                60 min
                                     pH«-l09[H*]
                            FIG, 3.—DESTRUCTION or SPORES or B. antkracis BV CHLORINE AKD HTH IN BUFFEIIED|
                                  DISTILLED AND TAP WATER AT 25° C.
                                    (950 to 2050 spores per ml)

-------
Recognition of a Problem



5 Full Scale Disinfection Contactors
 have non-ideal flow
                            .-•*

-------
Disinfection 2.5 (1980,
        SWTR)
and use c*t = fCoH  temperature
TABLE 1
CT Values for Disinfectants to Inactivate 99,99%of Giardia Lamblia Cysts
USEPA Guidance Manual to the SWIFT
Disinfectant
Free Chlorine at 2 mg/l3



Ozone
Chlorine Dioxide
Chloramine (performed4)
pH
6
7
8
9
6-9
6-9
6-9
<1 C
165
236
346
500
2.9
63
3800
5"C
116
165
243
353
1.9
26
2200
10 C
87
124
182
265
1.43
23
1 850
20 C
44
62
91
132
0,72
15
1100
25 €
29
41
61
88
0,48
11
750

-------
  Problems with 2.5
               All have mean=30 mm
                 andtlO=10min
o.oo
  o
20
40    60.
  time (mm)
80
100

-------
Disinfection 3 - Integrated
     Disinfection Design
Framework (1977-current)
Trussell & Chao
 & Application of
  chemical reaction
  engineering theory
 fc Assumption of
  complete segregated
  flow
Maior improvement
over 2/2.5
But there are still
 •roblems
                     batch C(t)
        continuous flow - f(t)
time
residence time
                       prediction of continuous
                         flow performance

-------
       Problems with  3
                 Q f(T)dr
  I  I  iii
Also, need RTD to
design - which may
not be available if
system is not built
                            Utility ID

-------
Disinfection 4 - Vision
Given
 4> Water quality information
 *> Design dose
 *> Contactor geometry and
   flow
Predict a priori
 4> Inactivation performance
 4> DBP production
Optimize aeometrv. dose.
                           We need
  That minimize cost &
  Satisfy the multiple (and
  increasing) regulatory
  concerns
Predictive model of
inactivation kinetics
Predictive model of
disinfectant demand
Predictive model of
DBP formation
kinetics
Predictive model of
continuous flow
reactor performance
(hydraulics and
concentrations)
                   Remainder of presentation

-------
  Inactivation Model Incorporating
              Water Quality
 Time,
 residual
 temperatur
 e,  pH,
 alkalinity
     Crypuosporildium
o.oi
               0.001
              0.0001
                 0.0001
        0.001
0.01
                         Predicted Survival
Calibrated System M
           Neural Network Mode
                in progress

-------
   Direct CFD Model -
        Chlorination
Direct CFD solution
 ^Eulerian-Eulerian disinfection model
 ^Simultaneous solution of continuity,
 momentum and mass transfer equations
   ^Accounting for reaction terms of disinfectant (1st
   order with immediate demand) and inactivation
   (Horn)
 ^Use of k-e model for turbulence closure
 (small Reynolds number option)
 ^Use of commercial package (CFX)

-------
  Pilot Chlorine Contactor
  ?Three-oass serpentine reactor
     3 gpm (11.4 liter/min)
     theoretical hydraulic detention
     time=3hr
     NaOCI was added to the contactor
     through an in-line static mixer
     8 intermediate taps
Funding - AWWARF, Collaborators - Montgomery-
Watson

-------
      RTD Prediction  (not fitting)
                       Predicted Tracer Curve
                       Experimental
                 \     r
Experimental and Predicted Tracer Curves for Pass 1
              Monitor Location

-------
       Residual  Prediction (not fitting)
Representative Chlorine Concentration
Plot for Reactor - Run Rl (a) Plan at
Mid-Depth; (b) Profile at Mid-Width.
        K4
        •L
x
             Experimental Value = 46 rng/L
                       6.00
                       5.00
                                  4.00
                       3.00
                                  2.00
                                  1.00
                                            Bull Run - MC
                                           • Willamette - MC
                                            Bull Run - FC
                                            Willamette - FC
                                  0.00
     Y
     •L*
      CHLORINE
       (m^L)
5.0OOOE+OO
4.9GG7E + OO
4.7783E+OO
4.65OOE-I.OO
4.5217E + QO
4.3933EH-OO
4.3OOOE-I-OO
                                     0.00      2.00       4.00
                                           Predicted Chlorine (mg/L)
                                                      6.00

-------
 Inactivation Prediction  (not fitting)
QuickTime™ and a Photo - JPEG decompressor are needed to see this picture
QuickTime™ and a Photo - JPEG decompressor are needed to see this picture
Representative Viable
Microorganism Density Plot for
Reactor - Run Rl, (a) Plan at
Mid-Depth; (b) Profile at Mid-
Width
                            100°/
                             80%
                             70%
                             60%

                             50%
                             40%
                             30%
                             20%
10%
          	IDDF
             CFD
         In (OBSERVED) - In (PREDICTED)

-------
Countercurrent
Pilot O3 Column
       CFD captures
       gradual
       consumption of
       indigo

       CFD images
       provide greater
       resolution of
       bubble plume than
       photographs
       (averaging)
    Bartrand,  2006
                                    (b) CFD, Color Contours

-------
    Full scale reactor - Alameda County Water
           DiStriCt (ACWD) ntng.tal.2006)
             gassing boundary at water surface
  Water inlet
  (specified normal
  velocity and
  Cryptospoiid'um
  pcffvum num.
  density)

  Q,,,= 9.5MGD
                             Symmetry plane
                          Water discharge
                          (specified
                          pressure)
Gas inlet (specified
normal velocrty and
O3 concentration)
                 = -| 80 SCmh
  O "Rough " grid (700,000
   elements)
  O First order ozone decay
               O First order Cryptosporidium
                parvum inactivation
               O First order bromate formation
52
  Demonstration of
           Full  Scale
          Feasibility
  (Bartrand,  2006)
                                                Dissolved ozone concentration
                                            Ozone decays rapidly;
                                            almost no residual
                                            when water reaches the
                                            third chamber
                1        m
Predicted inactivation
matches gross
measurements made in
full scale contactors
                                                                    Cryptoiporidurn pwum Nunber Density (org/U
                                                           Bromate formation rate
                                            Bromate formation hot
                                            spots coincide with
                                            regions of high ozone
                                            concentration
                                            Predicted bromate
                                            concentration matches
                                            gross measurements
                                            made in full scale
                                            contactors
                                                                   Bromate Concentration fug/L)

-------
 Needs for Future R&D
More extensive tests of NN kinetic
model fittin<
 ^Data gathering to fill in gaps (rich
  spectrum of water characteristics)
Exploration of NN for predictive
DBP and demand models
Validation of CFD a
full scale
roaches in

-------
Current state of art
     Obtain kinetic
     parameters,
     decay, in batch
Vision for future
state of art
                                  Kinetics from
                                  expert system data
                                  base
   Run pilot studies
   under different
   conditions
     Engineering
     evaluation of
     performance,
     reliability
                                 Simulation of many
                                 design alternatives
                             Role  of
                             Metamodeling
    Full scale design
    and construction

-------
   Oh and  by the way
If we can do this for disinfection ...
 ^ Why not for
   ^ Coagulation/flocculation
   -^Filter performance...
And we can build self-learnin<    "
treatment plants

-------
  Acknowledgements
           (partial)
Sponsors
  us EPA
  AWWARF
  IOA
  Phila. Water Dept.
  Montgomery-Watson
  LD Betz Endowment
Collaborators
 fcG. Finch (U Alberta)
 ^Former Students
    ^Dr. Dennis Greene
    (M&E/AECOM)
    ^Dr. Tim Bart rand
    (Clancy)
 ^R Trussell, J Jacangelo, J
 Oppenheimer
 (Montgomery)
 ^Dr. B Farouk (Mech. E.,
 Drexel)

-------
Watershed Management

-------
                Watershed Management
Measure for the Water Quality Improvement in
                   Dam Basin
                Mr. Hiroyuki Nakajima
               Chief, Management Section
  Kizugawa Dams Integrated Operation and Management Office
                 Japan Water Agency

-------
Measure for the water quality improvement in dam basin
            Hiroyuki NAKAJIMA
        Japan Water Agency (JWA)

-------
                        Contents
1. Introduction
2.The situation of eutrophication in JWA dams reservoirs
3.Water quality improvement facilities and their effects
4.Conclusions

-------
1.Introduction
      Target Areas of JWA

-------
1.Introduction
     Eutrophication phenomenon (Algal  blooms)
     Blue-green algae
Fresh water red tide

-------
 2.The situation of eutrophication in JWA dams reservoirs
 Total Phosphorus (T-P) and Chlorophyll-a and Classification of the

 Degree of Eutrophication





        Item          Oligotrophy    Mesotrophy     Eutrophy     Remarks


Annual average total
                       Af\    / 3   Ar\s  o^    / 3    o^   /  3  Vollenweider
phosphorus levels       < 10 mg/rrr   10 to 30 mg/rrr  > 30 mg/rrr
/   /  ?\
(mg/m3)
Annual average

chlorophyll a levels       < 2.5 mg/m3   2.5 to 8 mg/m3   > 8 mg/m3    OECD 1982

(mg/m3)   ^                                                   ^^

-------
 2.The situation of eutrophication in JWA dams reservoirs
          Number of facilities by eutrophication classification
        Annual average T- P in the surface layer of
             dam reservoirs (27 facilities)
CO
CD
O
CO
E
100%

 80%

 60%

 40%

 20%

  0%
         '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05
             ^ _>     Year
                                                     Annual average chlorophyll- a in the surface layer of
                                                            dam reservoirs (27 facilities)
                                                                                 25
                                                                                 20
                                                                                    00
                                                                                 15  I
                                                                                    CL
                                                                                    O
                                                                                 10  I
                                                                                    o
                                                                                    30mg/ m3
       <10mg/m3
                         10 ~ 30mg/ m3
                         'Average
                                                >8.0mg/ m3
                                                <2.5mg/ m3
2.5 ~ 8.0mg/ m3
'Average

-------
 2.The situation of eutrophication in JWA dams reservoirs
    Monthly and yearly changes in the number of facilities


              where had blue-green algae and fresh water red tide
 20
V)
CD
o
CO
CD
_Q

E
 10
CD ^
i- «J
  0
       Blue- green algae  m Freashwater red tide
                                   co
                                   CD
                                    6
                                   i5
o
TO
 0

Blue- areen alaae • Freashwater red tide
PI









"


















III










-


—




J— 1








-1
























i


1















j—




I!
PI


    '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05

                  Year
   1234567
                 Month
9 10  11

-------
S.Water quality improvement facilities and their effects
    N
              Algal bloom  Sunlight^
             Bypass
        The measure against eutrophication in dam reservoir;

-------
(1) Selective Intakes
          Discharge from low layer
                                               =^   Hotwater


                                                  Cold water
Lower a water level
         Cold water discharge (The decline of the water temperature)
         Inflow
         \
              Lower a water level
                    Hot water
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^m

                    Cold water
                                            Inflow
                                                        Algal bloom
                                              -Hot water
   Discharge low layer with lower a water level    Deep water depth    ^j

                                              (abiods Algal boom depth)

-------
 (2) Aerating circulation facilities
 Mechanism


(1) Effect of keeping blue-green algae in the darkness

(2)  Effect  of  nullifying the ability  of  blue-green  algae  to  regulate
  buoyancy through control of water temperature gradient and vertical
  mixing of the upper layer

(3) Effects of spreading nutrient salts throughout the shallow
(4) Effect of encouraging the growth of diatoms and other types of
  algae

-------
(2) Aerating circulation facilities

     Outline
                                                    Sunlight
     Inflow of nutrient
     salts
Aerating circulation
                                                    Eupnoticzone
                   Place of
                   darkness
                                                       Release
                                                       of water

-------
(2) Aerating circulation facilities
    l)Overview of the aeration circulation
     •    The purpose of the aeration circulation is to restrain the explosive-
          occurrence of the algae (phyto-plankton) such as blue-green alge
          by vertical-circulation on the dam lake with the air foam from the
          about 15-20 meter water depth.
            Figure
                           f
                       Water flow
           The depth of no sunlight
          6200
          The depth of sunlight reach
Air tube
1HH            Water flow
     vertical movement
                                     tf

-------
(2)  Aerating circulation  facilities
       2) Vertical distribution of water temperature
       •    Until 2002 when waterbloom was seen,water temperature of surface
            influence by outside temperature and thermocline is formed
       •    But since 2004, waterbloom was not seen with aeration circuration
            thermocline is not formed
                                                  is high

                                                  ,and
                 16.0
18.0
20.0
  Vteter Tenrrerature ( °C )
22.0   24.0   26.0   28.0
                                                         18-July-OO 10:23
                                                         12-July-01 10: 11
                                                         22-July-02 10:27
                                                         15-July-2003 10:36
                                                         20-j uly-2004 9:42
                                                         19-July-2005 10:44
                Vertical water temperature distribution ( July 2000 ~ 2005)
                          Notes:Aba(standard point) field survey

-------
(2)  Aerating circulation  facilities
     3)Relation between Water temperature of dam lake surface(O.Sm)
        and Microcystis number of cells
      •    When water temperature of surface becomes high,Microcystis number of
            cells become more than 10,000 cells
                        Microcystis number of cells and WateTemperature
                                        D<1,000(cells/ml)
                                        n<100,000(cells/ml)
                             <10,000(cells/ml)
                             >100,000(cells/ml)
                    100%
                     90%
                     80%
                     70%
                     60%
                     50%
                     40%
                     30%
                     20%
                     10%
                     0%
                    Times (time
- 15
75(times)
                          -20
                         38(times)    38(times)
                           Water temrerature (°C )
Water temperature and Microcystis number of cells
 Notes: result of regular water survey(per month) 1989-2004(standard point surface 0.
                                                    f
                                                                                9*

-------
(2)  Aerating  circulation facilities
       4)The installation site of the aeration

       •     Aeration installs about 1km interval from damsite to 3km of upper.

       •     And operating the aeration from about 20m depi
                                 Kizu river
                       Nol
                          Tkayama

                          bridge    .
                      Aeration     Tukigas

                       ~        bridge
                           Hachiman ^
                                Aeration

                             1km No4
        Dam site -> upper
                                         Aeration install site
           Takavama dam   ^riverbed level :measures in  2002
140
135
130
125
•§• 120
[j 115
- 110
CD 105
-1 100
95
90
85

Full water lebel (E.L.1 35.00m)

btj
'


nd
)







ard mint TakaVama brid9e



: D$pth
20m
5E
lisc
har

T3e
or


ptr
\

"IP
Je
^
v^






<
>

Ae rat io n No 1 Ae rat jfiaJ














>a
sjo:

^er
I-



LI

Depth
^ 15m 	 5
atin h
. 	 r 	


o3


A(
^^


mit water level in flood seas
r\n /P I 117 nHm\ h



lachiman bridge Tsu
kigase bridge


Depth
-I cimLow water levelCF 1 04

sra
••^


[tja


o-t



*?z



r^



••^*



^ ^


**— "


***'**'














^^ T i ^ ^
fWfn)










•• —





---





^— -















































*— —






__i»






. —






— — .






^






— I — ..»-
































^—







H
            o
            o
            •si"
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
CD
o
o
o
CM
o
o
•si"

CM
o
o
oo
c\r
o
o
                                CO
o
o
CD
oo"
o
o
o

•sf
o
o
•si"

•st
o
o
oo

•sf
o
o
                                               UO
o
o
CD

UO"
o
o
o
CD"
o
o
•si-

CD
o
o
oo
CD"
o
o
o
o
CD
o
o
o
oo"
o
o
•si"

oo
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
CD
o
o
O

-------
(2) Aerating  circulation  facilities
          5)The operation of Aeration circulation
           Four(4) aeration circulation were introduced from 2000 to 2003
           Operated one(l) aeration in 2002,two(2) aeration in 2003,and four(4) aeration
           continues since 2004
1 tern
1 nst al 1 at i on year
of aeration
Aer at on ISb 1
Aer at on ISb 2
Aer at on ISb 3
Aer at on N3 4
1 ni t i al cost ( one aer at i on)
» \ —• '• •/
r unni ng cost ( el ect lie f ee )
* ( i nspect i on )
Aerat i on dent h A r vol urne
cont ent s
2001
2002
2003
2003
About 65 000 000 ven
About 2 700 000 ven
About 600 000 ven
0- 20met er 5 6rrfi/ rri n

year
2002
2003
2004
Jan
F



M



L



Feb
F



M



L



Mar
F



M



L



Aip
F

^

^9

M





L





May
F





M
L

F
^
One(1)




Jun
M


L

F

Jul
M


L


F

Aug
M

L

aeration operates (No. 1 )
Sep
F


M



Two(2) aeration
operates (No.
1 No.2 f

Four(4) aeration operates (No.
1- No.4 )
L






Oct
F






M

w


K

L




Nov
F




M



L



Dec
F



M



L


_
               Mntoc- P -Pirct ton rla\/c  M • Mirlrllo ton rla\/c
I • I act ton rla\/«

-------
(2) Aerating  circulation  facilities
  6)Number of cells about Microcystis in Takayama Dam

      •    Before 2002, Microcystis number of cells was always 10,000cells/ml or
            more, but since 2003, Microcystis number of cells decrease
                       The cell number of Microcystis dam site (surface )
 ^100,000
 E 90,000
 ^ 80,000
 ® 70,000
 ;» 60,000
 a) 50,000
 " 40,000
 ° 30,000
 & 20,000
 I 10,000
       0
                  Aeration set up
                      _ j _ _    _ j _ _    j j
        '95   '96    '97   '98    '99   '00   '01    '02   '03    '04   '05   '06
                       The cell number of Phormidium in dam site (surface )
60,000
^ 55,000
E 50 000

1 45,000
o 40,000
w 35,000
0 30,000
o ^ ,- ^ ^ ^
^ 25,000
° 20,000
B 15,000
| 10,000
c 5,000
0
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
L L LI
:::::.::
1
• 1 II












11
























•








i



i
i
1,



r

i i
i i
" i "i ^_
i 1 1
i i~i
i 1 1
i i
i i
i i
APT
r^^±
i i
*
i i


1




















I 
"^



US*




'95   '96    '97   '98    '99   '00
'01
                                              '02   '03   '04    '05   '06    '07

-------
(2) Aerating  circulation facilities
 6)Number of cells about Microcystis in Takayama Dam

      •    A lot of number of cells about Microcystis was seen on surface at 2000-2002,
           but since 2003, is not seen from surface to deep bottom
               5,000
      Microcystis number of cells (cells/ ml)
10,000   15,000    20,000   25,000   30,000
                     16-Aug-OO
                     13-Aug-03
                16-Aug-OI
                30- Aug- 04
13-Aug-02
24- Aug- 05
              ^Displayed with overlap at 2003 - 2005
      Vertical distribution of number of Microcystis cells
         (August, 2000-2005)standard point 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 25m
                                                                        8,527,200cells/ml
                                                                        265,032cells/ml

-------
(2) Aerating  circulation facilities
  7) Annual occurrence fresh water red tide and blue-green algewater bloom

     •   Water bloom  was seen every year in summer (from July to September),
         but since 2003 which two aeration operates , water bloom isn't seen
                                        Fresh water red tide
Blue-green alg
1
¥3fc
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
?000
?001
?00?
2QQ3
?nn4
?005
?00fi
9007
Jar
F














M















|















F














Feb
M














I














Mar
F














M














|














Aor
F














M














|















F














May
M














|














Jun
F














M















|














Jul
F














M














|














Auc
F














M















|














Sen
F














M














|














Oct
F














M














|















F














Nov
M














|















F














Dec
M














|














                                              >x< Observation by watching

-------
(2) Aerating  circulation facilities
     8)Status of blue-green alge(Dam site point 2000-2005)
       •    Waterbloom was seen in 2000-2002 ,but was not seen in 2003-2005
        ^Photograph (Dam site point  August 2000 - 2005 )
          August 17 2000 waterbloom
Auqust 15 2001 v\at erbloom
          August 2003 No v\at er bloom  Aunust  18 ?004 No v\flt er bl oorr
                        August 24 2005 No v\at er bloom

-------
(3)Separative curtain
    1) Outline of separative curtain in Shourenji dam
                                              Funou river
              Separative  curtain
                                                             „     Funou river
                                                             Dam site -» upper
              Dam site
                                                 Separative curtain
                                                       Kaochi

                                                       1)
                                                               88888888888
                   Dam site -> upper
                  300
                                       Shourenji river Xwater bed level :measure in 2004
                                                       Full water level E.L277.0m
                                                  Sepflrative curtain
                       Limit water level in flood season E.L273.0m
                    r->OOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
                      oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
                                                                             "
Shourenji
   Kajika
   bridge

-------
(S)Separative curtain
     © The measure against
     eutrophication in dam reservoirs
                          inflow
@ The measure against turbidity
in dam reservoirs

-------
(3)Separative  curtain
  2)Function and effect of fractionation fences

  D Prevention of expansion of blue-green algae and freshwater red tide
  D Reduction of nutrient flowing into the surface layer on the lower stream side of
     the curtain
   Inflow of nutrient salts
             Reservoir fractionation fence
                 Depletion of nutrient salts in the
                 production layer of algae
         Bypassing of nutrient salts by selective intake
                                             Release
                                       ££££££# water

-------
(3)Separative curtain

  3) effects of curtain
                 Numbers of Peridinium cells
10000

 1000
   Is
  100

   10
               Peridinium

                    1
                 1


           '94     '95      '96     '97      '98      '99      '00      '01
              Changes over Time in the Numbers of Peridinium Cells
                     Upstream side of the fence
                     lowerstream side of the fence
   Q
                                                                  Installation of a reservoir
                                                                  fractionation fence
                                                                '02      '03
               2000    4000    6000     8000
                   Numbers of Peridinium cells
                      (Numberof cells/ml)
                                       10000
  Vertical Distribution of Numbers of Peridinium Cells (2002)

-------
                  4.Conclusions
l.Measures,such as selective intakes,aeration
circulation,separative curtain are effective for conservation
of water quality in reservoirs.

2.1t is necessary for dam management to effort for better
operation over monitoring of effects.
3.We have to progress the technical innovation to
people with good quality water.
sup

-------
Thank  you

-------
                 Watershed Management
  Management of the Impact of Earthquake on
                Sewerage Services
                   Mr. Osamu Fujiki
     Director, Wastewater and Sludge Management Division
             Water Quality Control Department
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM)
     Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

-------
        <"?>;
                Management of the Impact
                of Earthquake on Sewerage Services

                            i

                    Osamu FUJIKI
                    Director of Water Quality Control Department
                    National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management
                                "*"
                                   ~~~~~
                                                                   :
         :-".
        <£->•

' - -•   " :&
        ^l^^^BBK^MB^i^MMi^^^H^H-H^H^P^IM^
     Km^^^^t^^^^^^^^^^^^Umn^Kn^^^flA^f^^^fS^^Kn^^fui^^^^^^^^^^^^X^^^^KuJiT^^S^^^^K^^^I^^^m^^XU I '
U.S.-Japan Joint Conference on Drinking Water Quality Management and Wastewater Control
                                                               ••-

-------
Distribution  map  of earthquake's epicenter
         80*N
         40"N
                                       - h
                                   North Ann rican Plate
                South Amerrtan Plato
         40*S
         eo's

                10'E   SO'E   90"E   130'E   ITO'E
Earthquake's epicenter
    1991-2001
   magnitude: >5
   depth < 100km
                                 Source : the Japan Meteorological Agency

-------
 The Niigata-Ken Chuetsu Earthquake
                (2004.Oct.23) M6.8
Seismic Intensity Distribution
  j 37.3 degrees north latitude, 138.9 degrees of east longitude,
            depth 13km M6.8
                         Source: Japan Meteorological Agency

-------

-------


-------

-------

-------
 soil
accumulat
  3.4%

being
buried in
 water
 3.9%
 stagnant
  water
  31.1%
         Classification of damage  of
         Sewer pipes and  manholes
out break of crack
   2.6%
invasion
 water
  .8%
            breakdown
             of damage
            of sewer pipes
             others
             19.9°'
       road
      surface
      caving
       holes
       58.2%
                          float i
                          manhole
                          41.8%
                                         cover
                                          1.9%
                      breakdown
                      of damage
                      of manholes
                                    body
                                    17.4%
                                                       earth and
                                                       sand
                                                       5.0%
failure of
  pipe
connection
  3.9%
   8

-------
Process  of manhole    uplift
                              4) ground settlement
  2) Uplifted MH

  by buoyancy
                                soil liquefaction
\
i
i
                               High

                             groundwater

                               level
         3) Flow liquefied sand under MH

-------

-------

-------
*•>   *

-------

-------
    Concept of damage estimation method
                    for sewer pipes
Output: damage
estimation map
i Amount of damage ($)
: Length of
i   damage pipe (Km)
iPipe damage rate (%)
                   	
                Calculation
and estimation,
                   Input
Location ,type, diameter, and
length of a sewer pipe

 seismic intensity
 PL value
 Data from Central Disaster Prevention Council

 Data of digital
 topographical map
   14

-------
   Potential of Liquefaction  (PL)

  PL is the weighted sum of the strength against
  the sharing stress toward depth at the ground in
  question.
  PL is used as an indicator of liquefaction.
     value
potential of liquefaction
       0
     0
-------
    Concept of damage estimation method
         for WWTP &  Pumping Station
Output: damage
estimation map
Amount of damage ($)

Classification by
   degree of damage

Damage rate (%)
I--
i
M
•I
-.1
                Calculation
and estimation
Input
                                        Location and earthquake
                                        safety type of WWTP &
                                        Pumping st
                                         seismic intensity
                                         PL value
                                         Data from Central Disaster Prevention Council

                                         Data of digital
                                         topographical map
   16

-------
Target  :

   Expected North Tokyo Bay  Earthquake

             simulated by Central Disaster Prevention Council


 • Estimated earth quake center
    Northern Tokyo Bay (located immediately below
   Tokyo Metropolitan Area)
 • Target magnitude 7.3 based on earthquake record/
   ancient writing  in Japan since 1600

 • According to earthquake record/ ancient writing in Japan since 1600,
 -> Over Magnitude 8.0 : 2 earthquakes in 1703 and 1922
 -> Over Magnitude 8.0 : Low- frequency in next 100 years

 -> Magnitude 7.0-8.0 : 10++ earthquakes since 1600
 -> Magnitude 7.0-8.0 : a couple of earthquakes in last 200 years
 -> Magnitude 7.0-8.0 : Possibility in next 100 year
   17                            (Source: Central Disaster Prevention Council)

-------
 Seismic Intensity Distribution Map
of the North Tokyo Bay Earthquake
                                 Seismic Intensity

                                  0.5

                                 • 4,s-s:o
                                 • 5.0~S. S
                                  5.5-6.0
                                 • 6,0-S 5
                                 • >S 5
18
Source : the Central Disaster Prevention Council

-------
     PL value distribution map of the
       North Tokyo Bay Earthquake
19
           —^ -
                             S-ni


•' 1
w

V p
C^* T

PL Index

0
• D-50
fl 5.0-18.0




                      Source : the Central Disaster Prevention Council

-------
     Damage rate estimation map of
    sewer pipe under the North Tokyo
            Bay Earthquake

    .

                                 N



                               W   E


                                 S
                              Damage Rate
                              of Sewer (I)

                               o
                               i-il
                              • 2.5-5.0
                              • SO-IO 0
                               10 0~» 0
                              • ra 0-300
20

-------
 Classification Map of WWTP damage
under the North Tokyo Bay Earthquake


         ••
           •
     , a   i - ". .
                         7
                            •


                             Type
                                   W


 Capaeity(m3/d)
•,".' 0-5,000
& S.000-10.000
 10,000-25,000
,'V 25,000-50,000
 50.000-'100. QCQ
 > 100,000
21
Type-1
Damage by ground
lateral flow with
liquefaction
Type-2
Damage by
liquefaction
Type-3
Damage by seismic
force
Type-4
Slight damage

-------
  Estimation  of Damage of Pipe
                   Average
                 Max
  Km of damaged pipe
   Km of current pipe
   2.9%
   22.0%
    Amount of
     damage
   (million US $)
5,343 million
38,888 million
                                1 US$=100JPN
  Area: Saitama pref, Chiba pref .Tokyo metropolitan area .Kanagawa pref
22

-------
     Estimation of Damage of
    WWTP & Pumping station
                  Average
               Max
    Amount of
    damage
  (million US $)
1,590 million
4,056 million
                              1 US$= 100 JPN

Area: Saitama pref, Chiba pref .Tokyo metropolitan area .Kanagawa pref
   122 WWTPs and 537 Pumping stations
23

-------
   Estimation of the Number of people who
         can't access sewage system
                     Average
                Max
 Number of people
  As daytime population
961,000
6,431,000
Area: Saitama pref, Chiba pref ,Tokyo metropolitan area ,Kanagawa pref
    122 WWTPs and 537 Pumping stations
24

-------
    Answer to the Questionnaire on the Survival

                after a Huge Earthquake

225 (male:89, female: 136) out of 700 nominated office workers replied to the
questions on the supposition that they have to stay at office without water supply
for flush toilet for 3 days after a huge earthquake
How do you relieve yourself in case of no toiret service
for 3 days in your office after a huge earthquake ?
-29
30-39
OX)
40-49
50-
0°
50.0
-
46.2
-
48.4
-
35.0
1 I
/o 20% 40%
33.3 16.7

44.0 | 9.9

40.6 10.9

55.0 | 10.0
1 I
60% 80% 100%
D relieve myself outdoors D relieve myself indoors, wrapping D stand waiting for toiret service
e.g. in blind alleies it in paper or plastic bags for 3 days
  25
Survey field : Central Business District around Tokyo Station

-------
          Scenario Analysis
          for Biwako-Yodogawa River water system
•  Wastewater Treatment Plant

•  Damaged Wastewater Treatment Plant

•  Intake for Drinking Water
                      Kyoto
           Katsura River-v O
     Osaka   /~O  Osaka
     Bay
 26
                 Suppositions

      Large scale earthquake of
      maximum seismic intensity six-odd
      on the Japanese scale attacks
Biwa upriver area of Yodogawa River
      basin in winter when the river flow
      rate is relatively small.

      6 wastewater plants are damaged
      and cease to work. The influent
      raw sewage is discharges into
      Yodogawa River without treatment
      but simple clarifier and chlorination
      facility resume their functions on
      the 5 day after the earthquake.

      Water supply is cut  off just after
      the earthquake. But 25 % of the
      capacity is restored on the 5th day
      after the earthquake and total
      capacity is completely restored on
      the 46th day.

-------
Estimated Change in
the Concentrations of
Coliform Bacteria and
Cryptosporidium

at the water intake point
of 26 km upstream from
the river mouth
  3.0E+04
                                     -5
hJ
VI
-M
VI
VI
O
                                 4*
                                 u
                                 O
                                U
                                     -5
                                                 Coliform bacteria (Winter)
                                         No treatment

                                         Clarification and chlorination
                    10   15    20    25    30   35   40    45    5C
                     Pays after the earthquake
                                                   Cryptosporidium (Winter)
                                                                         No treatment

                                                                         Clarification and chlorination
                   10
 15    20   25   30    35
Days after the earthquake
40
45
50
  27

-------
    Estimated Variation
    in  the Concentration of Toxic Substances in  Drinking Water
          Limit for drinking water
  0.0
                   ^ ^ ^ ~- — M CM
                                      Removal Rate in the Process
                                      of Water Purification
                                                          I  8ft  I
                                       — — — — e^i CM
                                                             80V
U.UJ
0.02



y
*


*








X


:
















Targeted Toxic Substances
(1) Lead and its compounds (as the concentration of lead) (2) Arsenic and its compounds (as the
concentration of arsenic) (3) Hexavalent chromium and its compounds (as the concentration of
hexavalent chromium) (4) Phenols (as the concentration of phenol) (5) Cyanide ion and cyanogen
chloride (as the concentration of cyanogen) (6) Toluene
    Suppositions

Damaged area is caught in a
shower of 25mm in total for 6
hours.

The storm water washes toxic
substances out of the damaged
factories and other business
facilities and conveys them into
Yodogawa River.

The damage ratio is set at 0.23.

Half amount of every stored toxic
substance in damaged facilities
is assumed to be washed out
into the river.

The storage amount is set at
2weeks / 52 weeks (a year) of
the annual dealing amount which
is estimated from the data
registered in the PRTR
(Pollutant Release and Transfer
Register) System.
                     28

-------
Example of the Earthquake-proof Reinforcement
          in a Wastewater Treatment Plant
29
(Facility that needs quakeproof neasures)
D : Faci I i ty t hat ray st rongl y be
 daraged by eart hquake
El : Faci I i t y t hat ray be daraged by eart hquake
— : j oi nt
                              (D sast er prevent i on measures)
                             HI : Fjcpansi on j oi nt s
                             M : A new bypass pipe

-------
   Disasters occur because they
   come too late to remember
30

-------
                    Watershed Management
Understanding of Pollutant Behavior in a River Basin
                       Mr. Yuji Okayasu
          Senior Researcher, Water Quality Research Team
                Water Environment Research Group
              Public Works Research Institute (PWRI)

-------
                                  Title
Understanding of Pollutant Behavior
          in a River Basin
     Yuji Okavasu. Yutaka Suzuki
    Water quality research division,
    Public Works Research Institute
                                  00/20

-------
                                       Introduction
>The Water Pollution Control Law legislated in 1970
  defined Environmental Water Quality Standards (EWQS)
  as targets for water quality management, and effulent
  standards for industries were established.

> In order to effectively meet EWQSs, comprehensive
  watershed-wide sewerage master plans have been
  prepared and updated.

> River water quality parameters for living environments
  improved, however, there has been little improvement in
  lake, inner bay and estuary water quality.
                                               01 720

-------
                                              Introduction
Trend of share of types of
domestic wastewater treatment systems
  c
  i 100
c
o

I  50
Q.
O
Q_
      0
            No treatment
                                                Vault toilet
                                             (nightsoil collection
                                               and treatment)
                                               Sewage system
                                              Onsite treatment
                                                  system
          1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
                                                       02/20

-------
                                            Introduction
Trend of percentage of water quality monitoring station
where water quality standard is achieved

     100
  CD
  D)
  CD
  O

  CD
  CL
      80
60
40
20
       0
                              River
                              (BOD)


                              Lake
                              (COD)


                              I nner bay
                              and estuary
                              (COD)
O)
CO  CN  CD
l^-  CO  CO
O)  O)  O)
                O
                O)  O)
                O)  O)
                             CO
                             O)
                             O)
CN
O
O
CN
CD
O
O
CN
                                                     03/20

-------
                 Method 1 : Watershed Modeling
 >  Major contributors to water quality pollution
     in lake, inner bay and estuary
      1) Excessive algal production
      2) Release from sediment
I	1 3) Storm water runoff
^ Delivered loads from a river catchment were
   estimated and compared by two methods.
     >Method 1 : Watershed Modeling
       Commercially available watershed model
       (InfoWorks CS )	
     >Method 2 : Unit Load Approach
                                          04/20

-------
                      Method 1 : Watershed Modeling
> Location of study catchment
    Hiroshima
 Fukuoka
  a
  0
              Sapporo,
CowriehKC) 2007 TSUKUI International Inc. AH %hts Reserved
              Nagoya
              Kyoto
              Osaka
              Kobe
   Tokyo
Kawasaki
                    Pacific
                    Ocean
                      50km
                       i
                                                        05/20

-------
                   Method 1 : Watershed Modeling
> General information about the study catchment
                       > Name of catchment
                          Otsu River catchment
                          Otsu River runs into the lake Tega
                          Tone River sub-catchment
                       >Area
                          36.798km2
                       > Annual rainfall
                          Average 1,302 mm / year
                          2003    1,751 mm/year
                       > Population / Population density
                          216,459*   /  5,854/km2*
                       > Percentage of sewered population
                          58.5%'
f(2003)
                                                 06/20

-------
                 Method 1 : Watershed Modeling
                Geography
             Hydraulic conditions
             Base flow discharge
Flow rate
simulation
                Wastewater
               characteristics
                 Land use
 Monitored
precipitation
   data
                Monitored
                 flow rate
                  data
               > Model validation procedure
                        Water quality
                         simulation
                                                      Monitored
                                                     water quality
                                                        data
                                                     07/20

-------
                  Method 1 : Watershed Modeling
                          15
5/31 6/1
D 12 0
T
L

i^aic 6/2
12 0 12
6/3
0
_: ' u ' a ' ' ' ' i i i i
-


• Rainfall (mm/h)




                      CO
ou
40
n



Monitored
— Simulated




if^^-iM iii
                       D)
400
200
  0
Monitored
Simulated
                             Examples of validation results
rate and water quality monitoring
at 10 sites (3 times^§r site) during dry weather
at 3 sites (3 times per site) during rainfall events
                                                   08/20

-------
               Method 1 : Watershed Modeling
Model run results
>Annual average specific discharge
         2,627m3/d/km2 ( = 959 mm/year)

>Annual delivered loads
  from the Otsu  River catchment to the lake Tega
  estimated by the watershed model (InfoWorks
 CS)
                                ( Unit : t / year)
BOD
645
COD
791
T-N
293
T-P
32
                                        09/20

-------
                 Method 2 :  Unit Load Approach
 >  Major contributors to water quality pollution
     in lake, inner bay and estuary
      1) Excessive algal production
      2) Release from sediment
I - 1 3) Storm water runoff
^ Delivered loads from a river catchment were
   estimated and compared by two methods.
     >Method 1 : Watershed modeling
       Commercially available watershed model
       (InfoWorks CS
     I ^Method 2 : Unit load approach
                                          10/20

-------
                       Method 2 :  Unit Load Approach
            Channel,
            Stream
Sedimentation
Adsorption
Decomposition
Denitrification
etc
                          Pollution source
                             Treatment
                              facility
                                              Generated load
                      Discharged load
Pollutant delivery ratio =
 Delivered load
Discharged load
                                              Delivered load
         Receiving water
                                                        11/20

-------
                    Method 2 : Unit Load Approach
> Estimation of discharged loads
*On-site wastewater treatment facility
 On-site nightsoil treatment facility
Category
Domestic
Livestock
Industrial
Non-point
source
Total
Pollutant
source
Sewer
On-site WTF*
On-site NTF**
Vault toilet


Paddy field
Dry field
Forest
Urban

Number
126,627
23,453
43,585
22,794
162

229.0
1046.6
362.9
2059.3

Unit load Value
Unit
g
/capita
/day
g
/head
/day

g
/ha
/day

BOD
COD
T-N
T-P
Discharged load [ t / y ]
BOD
COD
T-N
T-P
(Diversion)
10.9
44.3
40
6.0

88
88
8.42
8.42

7.7
21.7
17
4.4

119
33.1
34.9
103

6.5
7.9
2
1.4

3.27
69.2
5.8
30.2

5
1.03
0.40
0.85

3.33
0.86
0.80
1.53

93
705
333
0.4
34
7.4
34
1.1
6.3
1214
66
344
141
0.3
34
9.9
13
4.6
77.4
691
56
126
17
0.1
40
2.7
26
0.8
22.7
288
6.4
16
3.3
0.1
6.6
0.3
0.3
0.1
1.2
35
                                                    12/20

-------
                        Method 2  : Unit Load Approach
 > Estimation of discharged loads
            *On-site wastewater treatment facility
            ** On-site nightsoil treatment facility
DC
Liv
Inc
Nd
so
To
    Relative pollutant source contribution
On-site WTF
On-site NTF
Vault toilet
Industrial
Livestock
Paddy field
Dry field
Forest
Urban
    Discharged Load (COD)
          :691 t/year
               -p
                                                  Discharged load [ t / y ]
    BOD
    COD
               Diversion)
                                              .03
                                             ).40
.85
5.33
                                              .86
                                              .80
.53
                                                   93
    705
    333
0.4
     34
7.4
     34
     1.1
6.3
                   1214
    T-N
          66
    344
     141
 0.3
     34
 9.9
     13
     4.6
77.4
         691
          56
     126
     17
 0.1
     40
 2.7
     26
     0.8
22.7
         288
    T-P
         6.4
      16
     3.3
0.1
     6.6
0.3
     0.3
     0.1
1.2
          35
                                                           13/20

-------
                   Method 2 : Unit Load Approach
> Pollutant delivery ratio
Specific
discharge
( m3/d/km2 )

< 2,000
2,000 - 3,000
3,000 - 4,000
4,000 - 5,000
5,000 - 6,000
> 6,000
BOD
annual
delivery
ratio
about 1 0%
15%
30%
45%
75%
1 00%
COD
annual
delivery
ratio
about 20%
30%
60%
90%
1 00%
1 00%
                                03
                                O
                                Q_
         246
             [103m3/d/km2]
Annual ave. specific discharge
                                                14/20

-------
                  Method 2 : Unit Load Approach
> Distribution of annual average
  specific discharge
                                        ( m3 /d /km2)
                                   O < 2,592
                                   O 2,592-4,320
                                   O 4,320-6,048
                                   O > 6,048
                                             15/20

-------
              Method 2 : Unit Load Approach
> Delivered load
   = Discharged load * Pollutant delivery ratio

> Annual delivered loads
  from the Otsu River catchment to the lake Tega
  estimated by the unit load approach
                                ( Unit : t / year)
BOD
138
COD
199
T-N
-
T-P
-
                                        16/20

-------
                                             Summary
> Results of discharged loads, delivered loads, pollution delivery ratios
Method
Watershed
Model
( Info Work
sCS)
Unit load
approach
Item
©Delivered
load
©Pollution
delivery ratio
©Delivered
load
©Pollution
delivery ratio
©Discharged
load
Unit
t- y1
%
t- y-1
%
t- y1
BOD
645
53
138
15
1214
COD
791
114
199
30
691
T-N
293
102
(86)
(30)
288
T-P
32
91
(11)
(30)
35


©/©
©x0


                                                    17/20

-------
                                             Summary
> Annual delivered loads from a catchment, where on-site treatment
  facilities are major contributors of water pollution, were estimated
  using the watershed model (InfoWorks CS) .

> Annual pollutant delivery ratios of BOD, COD, T-N, T-P, were
  calculated as 53%, 114%, 102%, 91%, respectively, by dividing the
  delivered loads by the discharged loads.

> Annual pollutant delivery ratios of BOD, COD were estimated to be
  15%, 30%, respectively according to the guideline.
  Thus, the result indicates that annual delivered load has been
  underestimated by the unit load approach (using unit load values
  and pollutant delivery ratios)
                                                    18/20

-------
                              Future Challenges
> While this study has dealt with the impact of on-
 site domestic wastewater treatment facilities on
 water pollution, impact of on-site livestock
 wastewater treatment facilities should also be
 dealt with by a future study.

>Monitoring programs must be designed with full
 consideration given to the updating of information
 and to the pollutant delivery ratio.
                                           19/20

-------
Thank you for your kind attention !
                                20/20

-------
  > Basic concept of components of flow in a river
Rainfall
Flow rate
                                     Stormwater
                                     Wastewater
Base flow discharge
                                                   Ex.01

-------
> Results of discharged loads, delivered loads, pollution delivery ratios
Method
Watershed
model
Watershed
model
( Vertical
dry
weather )
Unit load
approach
Item
(1) Delivered
load
(2) Pollution
delivery ratio
(3) Delivered
load
(4) Pollution
delivery ratio
(5) Discharged
load
Unit
t/y
%
t/y
%
t/y
BOD
645
53
142
12
1214
COD
791
114
123
18
691
T-N
293
102
154
53
288
T-P
32
91
27
9.4
35


(1)/(5)

(3)/(5)

                                                             Ex.02

-------