EPA Quarterly Management Report
                               October through December 2007
 Northeast  	1
 Great South  	2
 Midwest 	3
 Great American West  	4
 Islands	4
 Select Regional Priorities
    Tribes	5
    US-Mexico Border	5
 Select National Priorities
    Climate Change and Energy	6
    Air Quality	6
    Water Quality	7
    Enforcement and Compliance
    Assistance  	7
    Chemicals	7
    Best Available Science	8
    Homeland Security	8
    Land Revitalization	8
    Office of Inspector General Audits	8
                        THK WALL STREET JOURNAL.
         "We should do ihis more often. What if we
           broke the quarters down inlo eighths?"
                             Other Activities
                                Congressional Interaction	8
                                Regulatory Paperwork Burden	8
                                Office of Inspector General Operations	8
                                Electronic Data	8
                             Headquarters
                                Timeliness of Key Actions	 9
                                Energy Use at EPA Labs	9
                                President's Management Agenda	9
                             Administrative Services
                                Grants Management	10
                                Financial System Modernization Project	 10
                                Small Businesses	10
                                Workforce Recruitment	10
                                Diversity of Workforce	10
                              What is the Quarterly Management Report?
                              This report shows the US Environmental Protection
                              Agency's progress on selected priorities. It is
                              intended to elicit questions that lead to ideas about
                              how the Agency can better execute our
                              responsibilities under the law and do a better job of
                              protecting human health and the environment. In
                              many cases, measures may be affected by factors
                              outside the Agency's control. Success often relies on
                              working closely with our partners: states, territories
                              and tribes.

                              This report is only one of many budget, performance,
                              and financial tools used by the Agency for
                              management purposes.  It does not include all of the
                              Agency's priorities. The report is a balance of
                              national and regional information. Because it is
                              updated quarterly, most measures are outputs, not
                              outcomes. However, all the measures are linked to
                              objectives in the Agency's Strategic Plan. Performing
                              well on these measures  is assumed to lead to
                              improved public health and environmental protection.
Quarterly Management Report
Q1 2008
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
• Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.) • CY = Calendar Year
•T07 = 2007 FY Target           • FY = Fiscal Year
• T08 = 2008 FY Target           • N R = Not Reported
• TOY = Target Calendar Year        • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                         Select Regional Priorities
                                                                     NORTHEAST
                           Land Revitalization
                   Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)
o
OEPA cleanup efforts complement state and local activities to restore
contaminated properties to environmental and economic vitality.  Construction is
more active in spring and summer.

              # of Superfund Sites Completed in Northeast
     FY08 Target,!
                                                           - FY08 Target
                                                                 Date Source: CERCLIS
                            Air Quality: Ozone
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)
  ©
  ORedesignations generally show improvement in airquality. 8 of 33 areas
  remain eligible for redesignation in the Northeast Regions.
                 # of Eligible Ozone Non-Attainment Areas Redesignated
                                    ions 1, 2, and 3
                    • Eligible n Submitted • Q407 Approved n Q1 Approved
 Data is cumulative across fiscal years
                                                           Data Source; Regional Tracking
                                                                                                           Water Quality
               Advanced treatment and/or technology limits, addressed through the
               National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), will help reduce
               nutrients like nitrogen, a major cause of water impairment in the Northeast.
                                                                                                     # of NPDES Permits with Advanced Wastewater Treatment
                                                                                                    and/or Technology Forcing Limits for Nitrogen and Phosphorus
                                                                                                           Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
                                                                                                                                                       Data Source: PCS
                                                                                     0
               OThe Chesapeake Bay is a priority.  Though non-point sources are a major threat
               to the Bay, permitting significant nutrient dischargers helps restore and maintain
               water quality. Significant progress has been made in permits reviewed/reissued
               under the nutrient reduction strategy.

                          Chesapeake Bay Significant Discharge Permits
                           Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.3 (Ecosystems)
                                                                                                  Q207Q307Q407
                                                                                            Q107  ,„  160   165
                                                                                                                                            Q307
                                                                                                                                      Q207  240
                                                                                                                                       216
                                                                                                                                                 Q407
                                                                                                                                                  303
                                                                                             130
                                                                                                   150
                                                                                                  # perrrits reissued
                                                                                                                              # perrrits reviewed
                                                                                                                                                Date Source: R3 WPD/CBPO
 Quarterly Management Report
 Q1 2008        i
                              Unless otherwise specified:
                              • Data is cumulative thru current quarter
                              • Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept '08)
                              • Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)   • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)   • T07 = 2007 FY Target                 • FY = Fiscal Year
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)   • T08 = 2008 FY Target                 • NR = Not Reported
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)  'TCY = Tar9et Calendar Year	• N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                        Select Regional Priorities
                                                                   GREAT SOUTH
©
                                                               Water Quality

Setting Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) is one of the many tools used before taking further action to reduce nutrient pollution in the Mississippi River and the Gulf
of Mexico. Regions 3, 5, 7, and 8 joined the Great South in reporting this measure.


                                    Mississippi River Watershed: # of TMDLs Completed in Nutrient Impaired Waters
                                                  Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
                                FY 08 Target 198
                                              Q1
                                                                    Q2
                                                                                          Q3
                                                                                                                Q4
                                                    -2007
                                                                           -2008
                                                                                                  • FY 08 Target
         There are 73 actions for the Gulf of Mexico to be accomplished by 2009 that will increase
         understanding of environmental risks, build institutional capacity, and improve regional
         coordination. All projects initiated to date (68 of 73)  have either been completed or are on
         schedule including the implementation of the Gulf States Governors'Alliance.
                                  Gulf of Mexico Near-Term Actions
                              Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.3 (Ecosystems)
                                                                                      ©
                                        Ftending for
                                          Initiation
                                                          Ftending for
                                                           Initiation
               Ftending for
                 Initiation
                  37
               On Schedule
                  29
                 mpiere
                   7
                                         Completed
                                           16
                                                                 On Schedule
                                                                    51
                                                          Completed
                                                             17
                                                                                                               Data Source: PCS, ICIS, Office of Water, Region 6 Internal Data System, NTTS
                                    Over the next three years, over 382 TMDLs or equivalent decisions
                                    must be completed in South Florida.  Through FY2007, 69
                                    cumulative decisions have been made.
                                              South Florida Water Management District:
                                               # of Decisions Made on Impaired Waters
                                          Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
Q407 1 Q1
69 | 0
T08
20
                                                                                                                                          Data Source: 303(d) 1st
                                          Q407
                                                                                Data Source: GMPO
                                                                           Air Quality
                                                               Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)

         Timely development and approval of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) will lead to earlier action to address ozone.

                                                      # of Months Ahead (Behind) Schedule on Selected Clean Air SIPs
                                           Q407
                                                         Q1
                                                                                    Accomplishments (/Upcoming Milestones
         Region 6
                       Houston SIP
                                       (on schedule)
                                             (on schedule)
                     Da//as Fort Worth         0
                           SIP         (on schedule)
                                             (on schedule)
December 2007:  The Region proposed approval of the state's request that the Houston/Galveston
area be reclassified from moderate to severe nonattainment. The State also submitted a plan to
demonstrate that reasonable further progress will be made in reducing emissions.
July 15, 2008:  EPA to propose action to approve or disapprove Reasonable Further Progress SIP.
December 15, 2008:  EPA to take final action to approve or disapprove final 8-hour Ozone SIP.
July 15, 2008:  EPA to propose approval or disapproval of final 8-hour Ozone SIP.
December 15, 2008:  EPA to take final action to approve or disapprove final 8-hour Ozone SIP.
                                                                                                                                              ata Source: TCEQ SIP Schedule
 Quarterly Management Report
 Q1 2008        2
                              Unless otherwise specified:
                              • Data is cumulative thru current quarter
                              • Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept '08)
                              • Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
           • Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
           • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
           • 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
           • 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
•T07 = 2007 FY Target                 • FY = Fiscal Year
• T08 = 2008 FY Target                 • N R = Not Reported
• TOY = Target Calendar Year            • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                           Select  Regional  Priorities
                                                                            MIDWEST
                                Water Quality

        Nutrients are a major environmental threat to the Mississippi watershed.
        Permitting is the Agency's most direct way to address major dischargers.
       Mississippi River Watershed: # of NPDES Permits issued for Major Municipal and
              Industrial Facilities with Nutrient Limits or Monitoring Requirements
                       Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
      PC 08 Target, 66
                                                      	PC 08 Target
                                                                    Data Source: PCS/ICIS

        Compliance assistance supports and complements permitting efforts aimed at
        reducing nutrient levels.

               Mississippi River Watershed: # of Nutrient Compliance Assistance
              Seminars, Trainings or Presentations given to CAFOs, Municipalities,
                        States or Tribes in the Mississippi Watershed
                    Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1 (Improved Compliance)
                                                                    Data Source: PCS/ICIS

          Working collaboratively with other federal, state and local partners, the Great
          Lakes Initiative is on schedule. 13 of 45 projects are now completed including
          the development of the standardized beach sanitary survey.  Three action items
          were moved from near-term to long-term during Q2FY07.

                            Great Lakes Near-Term Actions
                       Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.3 (Ecosystems)
                                                             Off Schedule
                                                                 0
               On Schedule
                  40
                                                             On Schedule
                                                                 32
                                                              Completed
                                                                 13
                 0406                    0407
 Data is cumulative across fiscal years
                                                                     Data Source: GLNPO
                                     Air Quality: Ozone
                              Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)

                Redesignations generally show improvement in air quality.
                                                                                                         # of Eligible Ozone Non-Attainment Areas Redesignated
                                                                                                                               Region 5
                                                                                                             • Eligible n Submitted • Q407 Approved n Q1 Approved
                                                                                         Data is cumulative across fiscal years
                                                                                                                                               Data Source: Regional Tracking, FREDS
                                      Lead Poisoning
                Removing or otherwise controlling lead in housing addresses the primary source
                of childhood lead poisoning. Supplemental Enforcement Projects (SEPs) and
                Judicial settlements have typically driven accomplishments in this area.

                              # of Housing Units Abated/Mitigated for Lead
                                    Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1
                                         (Improved Compliance)
                                                                                            FY 08 Target, 350
                                                                                                                                               	FY 08 Target
                                                                 Data Source: ICIS, Manual Tabulation


          14 )  In some communities the soil around homes poses a risk of causing lead
                poisoning.

                          # of Lead-Contaminated Residential Properties Restored
                               Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)
                                                                                              FY 08 Target 700
                                                                                                                                              Data Source: ReqbnalSuperiund Reports
 Quarterly Management Report      Unless otherwise specified:
 (~)1  7OOR                            -Data is cumulative thru current quarter
 Li I  ZUUO         3                  •Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept'08)
	• Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)    • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)    • T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • FY = Fiscal Year
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)    • T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • NR = Not Reported
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)   'TCY = Tar9et Calendar Year	• N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                     Select Regional Priorities
                                                      GREAT AMERICAN WEST
                                                                     Agriculture
                                                       Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1 (Improved Compliance)
 15 )  Compliance assistance supports and complements permitting efforts aimed at
       reducing nutrient levels from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
       (CAFOs).
             # of CAFO Entities Reached Through Compliance Assistance
                                            16 )  Inspections remain an important tool to address poorly managed livestock
                                                 operations that can pollute rivers, lakes, estuaries and groundwater. The
                                                 number of inspections includes joint EPA/State inspections.

                                                                       # of CAFO Inspections
    FY 08 Target 8,305-
                                                                                     FY 08 Target 82
Target will be increased to 8,425 contingent upon finalization of the CAFO Rule by July 1.
                                                                Data Source: ICIS
                                                                                                                                     Data Source; ICIS, ICIS/OTIS/PCS
                                 Energy
            Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air) and 2.2 (Water Quality)

       Timely permitting of environmentally sound energy activities contributes to the
       nation's energy security and protects the environment. The number of permits
       includes Underground Injection Control and air-related permits. This measure
       only reports on Region 8 accomplishments.
             # of Oil and Gas Activities for Which EPA Issued a Permit
                                             Data Source; Staff iBcoris and Region 8 programs
                                                                            Mining
                                              Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land), 4.1 (Chemical, Organism & Pesticide Risks),
                                                                        and 5.2 (Restore Land)
                                                   Abandoned and poorly managed mining sites may threaten rivers, lakes,
                                                   estuaries and groundwater. In the  Great American West, EPA regions are
                                                   reclaiming land and protecting the environment through Superfund remedial
                                                   actions and removal actions, Brownfields actions, and voluntary cleanup
                                                   programs.

                                                 # of Acres Addressed (or Cleaned up) by Superfund Remedial, Removal and Non-
                                                                         Regulatory Programs
                                                                                                     Data Source: Staff Reports, Reg/on 8 A/EPA Program, CERCLIS, GPRA Forms
                                                     Select Regional Priorities
                                                                     ISLANDS
             % of Population with Access to Drinking Water Meeting EPA Standards

Region 2 (Puerto Rico)
Region 9 (Pacific Islands)
Q407
33.60%
60%
Q1
36%
NR
Region 9 data is from the previous quarter due to data reporting constraints.
Data for Puerto  Rico represent a 12-month rolling average through 9/30/07.
                                                            % of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Compliance with
                                                                   BOD/TSS/No Bypass Requirements

Region 2 (Virgin Islands)
Region 2 (Puerto Rico)
Region 9 (Pacific Islands)
Q407
70%
70%
75%
Q1
70%
70%
83%
Quarterly Management Report     Unless otherwise specified:
(~)1 7OOR                         -Data is cumulative thru current quarter
^i I ZUUO        4                -Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept
                                    • Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)    • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
                                    • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)    • T07 = 2007 FY Target                • FY = Fiscal Year
                                    • Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)    • T08 = 2008 FY Target                • NR = Not Reported
0406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)    . Q4Q7 = pct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos)  'TCY = Tar9et Calendar Year	• N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                           Select Regional  Priorities
                                                  TRIBES AND  US-MEXICO BORDER
                             Tribes: Air Quality
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)
' 21 ^  Improving the Title V Air Permit program offers great promise to addressing air
     1  quality on Tribal lands.
ttoflnlialPermls  l*sue,d
             Pending        0
# of Renewal     Issued         0       01
Permits        Pending        0       0

™"-*     £±g        I
No Federally Recognized Tubes in Region 3 No Title V permits in
                                # of Title V Air Permits
                               Region 2 Regions Region 6 Regions Regions Region 10
                                    olw      In      TI\       in     ii
                                                  0
                                                  0
                                                  1      13
                                                  04
                                                  1      30
                                              an Country lor Regans f,
     Data Source: Region 5, FREDS, Regbnal Tracking, Internal Reports, Pali 71 Program Implementation Tracking System
                          Tribes: Water Quality
       Addressing drinking water issues offers great promise for improving health on
 22 )  Tribal lands.
          # of Water System Sanitary Surveys Within the Past 3 Years (5 Years for
                               Outstanding Performers)
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.1 (Human Health)
                                Data Source: SDWIS, Regional Tracking, Region 6 and Region 10 Databases
 23  )  Current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits
       improve and maintain water quality.

                         # of NPDES Permits Issued and Current
                      Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
    FY08 Target 387

            3121
No Federally Recognized Tribes in Region 3.
                                               Data Source: PCS, ACS, NPDES, Bbsolids Staff, ICIS
                 US-Mexico Border: Land Revitalization
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.2 (Communities)
 24 )  Removing scrap tires reduces mosquito-borne diseases and fire risk.

                      US-Mexico Border- Tires Removed from Piles
                                                   Data Source: BECC, SEMERNAT, EPA Grantees
                                                                          Tribes: Land  Preservation
                                                  ^25^  EPA regions support Tribal solid waste management programs including
                                                   ^^  actions to address risks associated with open dumps. Region 6 and Region 9
                                                         significantly exceeded their annual targets in FY07.
                                                            # of Open Dumps Closed, Cleaned Up, or Upgraded in Indian Country
                                                             Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.1 (Preserve Land), 3.2 (Restore Land), and
                                                                    5.3 (Tribal Capacity to Implement Environmental Programs)
                                                      0407
                                                      707
                      Region 1 Region 2 Region 4 Regions Region 6 Region 7  Regions  Regions  Region 10
                        0	0	0	3    I  15^   0	4       82       3
                        0002302       20       2
                                                     Indian Health Service is assessing the sites on reservations and universe is not known. No Federally Recognized Tribes
                                                     in Region 3.
                                                                                     Data Source: IHS Database, Manual Report, Grantee Progress Reports

                                                         Region 10 is supporting Alaskan recycling and safe solid waste disposal practices
                                                         to address health and environmental risks. Over four times more Ibs of
                                                         recyclables were diverted in Q108 relative to Q107.

                                                                                 Alaska Village Solid Waste
                                                                       Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.1 (Preserve Land) and
                                                                       5.3 (Tribal Capacity to Implement Environmental Programs)

                                                                      Lbs. of Recyclables Diverted from Village Dumps
                                                                                                                  Lbs. of Trash Collected for Proper Disposal
                                                                                           Data Source: RurAL CAP Grants, /GAP Proposals Master Log
                                                                                                            US-Mexico Border: Water Quality
                                                                                                             Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.2 (Communities)

                                                                                                One goal of the U. S. -Mexico Border Program is to provide protection of people
                                                                                                in the U.S.-Mexico border area from health risks by increasing the number of
                                                                                                homes connected to potable water supply and wastewater collection and
                                                                                                treatment systems. EPA is addressing this through financial assistance for new
                                                                                                infrastructure and technical assistance. Data is typically reported later in fiscal
                                                                                                year.
                                                                                                       Additional Homes Served by Improvements in Water Services
                                                                                                                     Drinking Water (Regions 6 & 9)
                                                      FY08 Target 2,500- -
                                                                                                                  -» 1,276
                                                                                                                   04
                                                                                                                                          - FY08 Target
                                                                                                                      Sewer Systems (Regions 6 S 9)
                                                                                                FY 08 Tar get 15,000
                                                                                                                                -2008	FY08 Target
                                                                                                                                                      Data Source: NADB Reporting
Quarterly Management Report
Q1  2008         5
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept '08)
• Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)    • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)    • T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • FY = Fiscal Year
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)    • T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • NR = Not Reported
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)  'TCY = Tar9et Calendar Year	• N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                              Select National  Priorities
                                                                    Climate Change and Energy
   ENERGY STAR: Additional Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoided and Cost Savings
              Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5 (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)

       ENERGY STAR helps individuals and organizations reduce energy use, save
       money, and prevent greenhouse gas emissions.  The numbers below represent
       incremental savings attributable to the program as a result of activities occurring
       in Fiscal Year 2008.  They are in addition to savings from actions taken prior to




$0.2
0*6
^


$0.6

1.0
H


$1.0

1.3
^


$1.4


1.7


$0.40

0.4
                                                                              ENERGY STAR: Square Footage of Buildings Rated (in Millions)
                                                                                  Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5 (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)

                                                                       Benchmarking building energy use allows building owners and operators to
                                                                       monitor energy use and target efficiency improvements.  This quarter the QMR
                                                                       has converted to reporting this measure in terms of square footage rather than
                                                                       the number of buildings. Regions differ in their prioritization and, therefore,
                                                                       accomplishments related to this specific voluntary program.
                                                                                          Region 1 Region 2 Regions Region 4  Regions Regions 6 Region 7 Regions Regions 9  Region 10
                                                                                            187  |   278     370      562      524      363      103      112      495      141


                                                                                                                                                            Data Source: Energy Star
               Q107
                                           Q307
                                                         Q407
                   3 Estimated GHG Emissions Avoided from New Actions Taken (in MMTCE)
                   -Estimated Net Savings from New Actions Taken (in billions)
                                                             Data Source: OAR Analysis
       EPA is the lead agency for three important studies being conducted under the
       government-wide Climate Change Science Program. Two of the three reports
       have been completed and disseminated.

                   # of Months Ahead (Behind) on Select Climate Change Activities
                         Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4. 4 (Science & Research)
                                                                                Alaskan people and habitat will likely be more sensitive to changes due
                                                                                to a warming climate than other parts of the U.S.
                                                                                      # of Collaborative Alaska Climate Change Events/Projects
                                                                                         Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.6 (Science & Research)
                  liminary Review of Adaptation Options
                   for Ecosystems and Resources
                        0 (on schedule)
                                                                       n Human Health and Welfar
                                                                            Systems
                                                                           0 (on schedule)
Upcoming
Milestones
              PA com pleted the expert review of SAP   This study was com pleted and
                on coastal elevation and sensitivity to   disseminated.
                level rise.
               draft for public review will be published in
              Y08 Q2.
                                                                 This study was completed and disseminated.

Accomplishments
Total # of
Events/Projects
8
Events/Projects
Completed
6
# of Events/Projects Underway
2
Alaska Forum and Business Roundtable schedule for February 2008.
                                                              Data Source: Gbbal Change Researc/? Program
       Methane to Markets is an international public-private partnership to advance the
       recovery and use of methane as a clean energy source.
                       Key Methane to Markets Quarterly Milestones Met
                    Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5 (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)
                                                                                                                                                 Data Source: R10 Climate Change Team
                                                                                SmartWay works with the transportation and freight sectors to reduce
                                                                                GHG emissions and reduce costs.
                                                                                 SmartWay: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
                                                                                       Avoided and Cost Savings
                                                                                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5
                                                                                        (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)
      #of Milestones
         (for FY08)
            34
#of Milestones Met or
      Exceeded
                      Methan to Markets (M2M) achieved four milestones in
                      FY08 Q1, which means that it achieved all its calendar
                      year 2007 milestones. In FY08 Q1,  EPA hosted the
                      first M2M Partnership Expo in Beijing, China with over
                      750 participants from over 40 countries.
                                                                                                                3 Estimated GHG Emissions Avoided -
                                                                                                                                              -Estimated Net Savings (in billions)
                                                         Data Source: ASG Schedule of Key Milestones
                                                                                                                                              Date Source: FLEET Model, SmartWay Database
                                                                                    Air Quality
                                                                       Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)

      Old diesel engines are a major source of soot and these projects are an extremely cost-effective way to improve air quality.  Results are reported jointly for Blue Skyways
      (Regions 6&7) and West Coast Collaborative (Regions 9 & 10).
                                                                                                                         # of Diesel Bigines Affected               34^
                             # of Emission Reduction Projects
                                                                                Data Source: NCDD
Quarterly Management Report
Q1  2008        6
                Unless otherwise specified:
                • Data is cumulative thru current quarter
                • Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept '08)
                • Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
•T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • FY = Fiscal Year
• T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • N R = Not Reported
• TOY = Target Calendar Year             • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                Select National Priorities (continued)
                                                                         Water Quality
                                                              Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
         EPA approval of revised standards establishes updated goals for water quality
         protection programs.
       % of State/Territorial Water Quality Standards Revisions Approved by EPA


                                                         76%

                                     R7%
    FY08 Target, 74%

                  4
                  • 54%
                                                 35 )  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting is one of the
                                                       most direct tools EPA has to address water quality issues. The priority permits
                                                       initiative was created to prioritize the issuance of the most environmentally
                                                       significant permits. Progress on this measure begins in January of each year.


                                                          % of High Priority NPDES Permits Scheduled to be Issued in FY that are Current

                                                                                                                  111%
                                                         FY 08 Target 95%
                  Q1
                                      Q2
                                                          Q3
                                                                             Q4
                                                                                                                                                            Q4
                                                                • FY08 Target
                                                                                                                                                     • FY 08 Target
                                                                   Data Source: WATA

                             Number of TMDLs that are Established or Approved by EPA [Total TMDLs] on a Schedule Consistent with National Policy
                                                                                                                                          Data Source: PCS, ICIS, and Internal Sources
                     Region 1     Region 2     Regions     Region 4    Regions     Regions 6
                       5,396         8          16          59          6           8
                                                       Region 7
                                                          4
Regions       Regions 9     Region 10
   0             25           123
       Note: A TMDL is a technical plan for reducing pollutants in order to attain water quality standards. The terms 'approved' and 'established'refer to the completion of the TMDL itself.
                                                         Enforcement and Compliance Assistance
                                                            Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1 (Improved Compliance)

         Vigorously enforcing environmental laws continues to be a critical component of EPA efforts. Compliance assistance continues to be an effective complement to enforcement.
         A large settlement resulted in surpassing annual targets during Q1 for 3 of 4 measures reported.

                                                                  Enforcement and Compliance Assistance

Number of Civil Referrals
Estimated Lbs of Pollution Reduced (Millions)
$ Invested in Pollution Control as Result of Enforcement (Billions)
% of Compliance Assistance recipients improving practices
Q407
278
890
10.6
91%
Q1
17
988
7.8
95%
T08
NR
890
4.3
50%
                                                                                                                                                            Data Source: ICIS
                                                                            Chemicals
                                                      Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.1 (Chemical, Organism & Pesticide Risks)
         Pesticide program is on target for phasing out old review process (complete
         remaining non-food use Reregistration Eligibility Decisions [REDs] by end of
         FY08).
                    Pipeline for Reviewing Registered Pesticides
                                                         The Pesticide Registration Improvement Act (PRIA) provides reduced
                                                         timeframes for completing registration decisions. Since Q1 FY06 OPPTS has
                                                         achieved a minimum 99.7% on time record.

                                                       Pesticide Registration Improvement Act: Applications Received, Completed, Pending,
                                                                  Percent Negotiated, and Percent On Time at End of Quarter
                                1 st Quarter FY 2008 As of December 31,2007
                                 DNon-food REDs remaining - proj
                                 • Non-food REDs remaining-actual
                                 DDockets- Projected
                                 • Dockets-Actual
                                 DFinalWP-Projected
                                 • Final WP-Actual
       I
Received
Completed (includes withdrawn)
% of completed and withdrawn decisions with negotiated due dates
% on time (completed on or before PR/A or negotiated due date)
Total Pending
Q407
1,722
1,756
14%
100.0%
1,207
Data So
Q1
380 I
507
17%
99.8%
1,087
urce: OPPIN
                                                                                              Beginning this quarter, EPA is reporting on 'risk-based decisions' in addition to
                                                                                              screening-level hazard characterizations for High Production Volume (HPV)
                                                                                              chemicals. EPA is also planning to begin reporting on risk-based decisions
                                                                                              related to Moderate Production Volume (MPV) chemicals beginning in Q308.

                                                                                                 Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) Commitments for High Production
                                                                                                     Volume (HPV) and Moderate Production Volume (MPV) Chemicals
                                                                      Data Source: OPPIN

Cumulative number of High Production Volume (HPV)
hemicals with Risk Based Decisions completed.
umulative number of Moderate Production Volume
MPV) chemicals with Hazard Based Decisions
completed.
otal HPV Chemicals with Screening Level Hazard
haracterization Reports Completed.
Q407
NR
NR
301
Q1
15
0
132
T08
150
55
329
                                                                                                                                Data Source: HPV Program Screening Phase Tracking Files
Quarterly Management Report
Q1  2008        7
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept '08)
• Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 1 2 mos.)
         • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
         • T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • FY = Fiscal Year
         • T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • NR = Not Reported
         ' TCY = Tar9et Calendar Year _ • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                               Select  National  Priorities  (continued)
                                                               and Other Activities
                                         Enabling and Support Programs in Strategic Plan (unless specified)
                                                                   Best Available Science
                                                           Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.4 (Science & Research)
       EPA is working to gain agreement with OMB on the content of the new
       process of its Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Federal Register
       notice. Future milestones are being revised to complete the updated IRIS
       process as quickly as possible.
                                                                         Research labs continue to achieve good results related to meeting their key
                                                                         management objectives.
                                                                                  % of Key Research Management Objectives On Schedule
                                                                                             EPA Labs and Research Centers
#of Months Ahead
(Behind) Schedule
     IRIS-
   Update of
    Process
Q407

(10)
                           * of Months Ahead (Behind) Schedule
(13)
       Accomplishment(s)/ Upcoming Milestones
Milestone for January 21, 2008: The program will present
and discuss this Assistant Administrator approved process
with the inter-agency working group.

National Exposure Research Lab (NERL)
National Health 8. Environmental Effects Research Lab (NHEERL)
National Risk Management Research Lab (NRMRL)
National Centerfor Computational Toxicology (NCCT)
National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
National Center for Environmental Research (NCER)
National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC)
Q407
100%
100%
100%
50%
89%
92%
100%
Q1
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
95%
100%
                                                                  Data Source: ORD
                                                                                                                                             Data Source; ORD's IRMS database
                                                                      Homeland Security
                                                              Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)
         EPA plays an important role in responding to natural disasters and emergencies.  To prepare for these events, EPA is actively training staff and conducting exercises.
                         People Trained
                                                                                                                       Exercises
                                                                                                                                                Date Source; Regional Reports
                                                                      Land Revitalization
       EPA cleanup efforts complement state and local activities to restore contaminated
       properties to environmental and economic vitality. Data collection typically lags for
       this measure so Q407 data are reported for the first time in this QMR.
                                                                         Restoring contaminated properties reduces potential exposures to hazardous
                                                                         wastes.
                                                                                      Human Exposures Controlled at High Priority Sites
                                                                                        Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)
          # of Brownfields Assessments and Superfund Constructions Completed
            Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land) and 4.2 (Communities)
                                           I  Q407  I  Q1     T08
           Brownfields Properties Assessed    \  1,225  |  NR   I  1,000
                                              24
           Superfund Constructions Completed
                                                       1
                                                               30
                                                «y

                                                '
                                                                                                                     Q407
                                                                        Number of high priority RCRA facilities with human
                                                                        exposures under control
                                                                                                                              Q1
                                                                                                                               2
                                                                                                                                T08
                                                                                                                                49
Brownfields results not complete forFYOT.
                                                          Data Source; CERCLIS, ACRES
                                                                        Number of Superfund, including Federal facilities,        13       26         10
                                                                        hazardous waste sites with human exposures under
                                                                        control
                                                                        "Under controF' indicates that EPA or state officials have determined that there are no unacceptable human
                                                                        exposures to contamination (present above appropriate risk-based levels) that can be reasonably expected
                                                                        under current land- and water-use conditions.
                                                                        	Data Source: CERCLIS, RCRAtnfo
                       Congressional  Interaction

        Timeliness of Correspondence (average # of correspondence overdue)
       Constructive interactions with Congress ensure appropriate tools and
       resources are available for protecting human health and the environment.
            Overdue Correspondence
                        IQ407  I    Q1
                           1     I    0-7~
                                                                  Date Source: CMS
                                                                                     Regulatory Paperwork Burden

                                                                                         Paperwork Burden (millions of hours)
                                                                         EPA tracks the paperwork burden associated with its actions.  Burden hours
                                                                         have increased by about 0.9% in FY07.

                                                                                            FY'02
                                                                                            140.7
                                                                           FY'03
                                                                           144.9
                                                                       FY'04
                                                                       142.3
FY'05
143.9
FY'06
145.5
FY'07
150.2
FY '08   Target
151.5     143.9
                                                                                                                                          Data Source; OMB Report of Active ICRs
                Office of Inspector General Operations
       EPA improves programs and addresses weaknesses by responding to and
       implementing recommendations arising from reports and investigations by the
       Office of Inspector General. OIG Investigative Operations up compared with Q1
       2007.
                                                                                                 Electronic Data
                                                                         Taking advantage of the information age offers great opportunity for cost-savings
                                                                         and increased transparency. All 50 states now participating in the Exchange
                                                                         Network.
OIG Audit Operations

Questioned Costs
Recommended Efficiencies
OIG Investigative Operations

fines and recoveries
Indictments and convictions
CivilJudgments/Settlements/Filings
Administrative actions against EPA employees/firms

Q407
$56,300,000
$33,900,000

Q407
$ 5,033,129
10
4
68

01
$1,020,000
$150,000

01
$ 1,360,000
17
3
17
Exchange Network
# of States Flowing Data
# of Tribes Flowing Data
Central Data Exchange
Transactions Inbound
Transactions Outbound**
\ CDX Total
Q407
50
7
Q407
21,023
578,826
599,849
Q1
50
7
Q1
18,096
412,276
430,372
                                                             Data Source; IGOR, PMRS
Quarterly Management Report
OJ  2008        8
                   Unless otherwise specified:
                   • Data is cumulative thru current quarter
                   • Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept '08)
                   • Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
                                                   • Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
                                                   • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
                                                   • 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
                                                   • 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
                                                                            • 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
                                                                            •T07 = 2007 FY Target                 • FY = Fiscal Year
                                                                            • T08 = 2008 FY Target                 • N R = Not Reported
                                                                            • TOY = Target Calendar Year            • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                               HEADQUARTERS
                                                            Timeliness of Key Actions
       Completing actions ahead of schedule means EPA keeps its commitments, improves the quality of decisions, and the public and environment benefit from EPA's key actions
       sooner. EPA is working on getting the actions furthest behind back on track.
                                                                                               Of the 30 actions being tracked against internal
                                                                                                 milestones*, the following eleven actions account for

Days ahead (behind) schedule
# of Key Actions being tracked
EPA Office
(756)
10

0
0

(103)
6
OSWER
0
5
ow
(1424)
9
TOTAL
(2283)
30
                             Average Number of Days Ahead (Behind) for
                               DA Priority Actions (beginning 1/1/2007)
  £  -40 -
  £
  i
  J!  -50-
                                                            the days behind schedule.

                                                           OAR
                                                           • New Source Review - Emissions Test for Electric
                                                            Generating Units
                                                           • Disposal in Yucca Mountain, NV
                                                           • Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
                                                            Review
                                                           • Revisions to the Definition of Potential to Emit
                                                           • Green House Gas Emissions from Motor Vehicles

                                                           OPPTS
                                                           • Lead Based Paint - Renovation, Repair and Painting

                                                           OW
                                                           •Affordability Guidance
                                                           •Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Rule
                                                           • Contaminant Candidate List 2
                                                           • Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Airport
                                                            Deicing Operations
                                                           •Contaminate Candidate List Selection
                                                           •Water Transfers Rule
                                                            "This chart reflects timeliness in relation to internal milestones only
                                                              and is not intended to indicate compliance with any mandatory duties
                                                              or deadlines.
                                                                                                       Data Source: SCOUT Database
                                                              Energy Use at EPA Labs
       Saving energy at EPA facilities helps increase energy security, reduce pollution and cut greenhouse gas emissions. Region 5 has no EPA owned labs.

                                                      Increase (Decrease) in Amount of Energy Consumed in MMBTUs
            Oct 2006 - Dec 2006
            Oct 2007 - Dec 2007
         FY 07 Increase (Decrease)
            compared with FY 06
                                    3,899
                                    4,544
645
 gion 2 Regions  Region 4 Regions  Regions Region 7  Regions Regions  Region 10 HQ-ORD HQ-O,
7,388    14,477    5,394      N/A     5,415     4,343    5,232    4,633     5,329     48,124    15,205
         11,794                     ~
7,941
         553
                  (2,683)
5,093

 (301)
                                       N/A

                                       N/A
4,919

 (496)
5,496

1,153
5,322

 90
                                    4,889
                                                                            256
                                                                                     5,790
                                                                                      461
46,525

(1,599)
15,169
HQ-ORD includes data from the following labs: Edison, Athens, Narragansett, Corvallis, Gulf Breeze, Ada, Gross lie, Duluth, Newport and Las Vegas
HQ-OAR includes data from the following labs: Ann Arbor, and Montgomery
HQ-OARM includes data from the following labs: RTF * New Main, RTF * NCC, RTF * Human Studies, RTF * NHEERL, RTF * Page Road, RTF * Burden/Jenkins, RTF * Childcare,
RTF * Incinerator/Waste Handling, Cincinnati * AWBERC, Cincinnati * Test & Eval, Cincinnati * Center Hill, Cincinnati * Pub Warehouse, Cincinnati * Child Dev. Ctr
                                                                                                                lource: Utiity Bills
                                                          President's Management Agenda
                                                                                                                                                 e. Earning a
       "green" score in these five areas addresses significant government-wide deficiencies identified by the Government Accountability Office, Inspectors General, the Office of
       Management and Budget, and others. In Q1 FY 2008, EPA achieved the highest score possible on the PMA: five "greens" on all five government-wide initiatr
                                                          Executive Branch Management Scorecard
                                                   Environmental Protection Agency
                                                   PMA Initiative
                                                   Human Capital
                                                   Competitive Sourcing
                                                   Financial Performance
                                                   E-Government
                                                   Performance Improvement
                                                    nitiative
                                                   Eliminating Improper Payments
                                                   ;first reported Q1 2005)
                                                                             * All government agencies received a
                                                                             yellow progress score in E-Government
                                                                             for Q4 FY 2007. EPA's status score
                                                                             remains green but the progress score is
                                                                             downgraded to yellow because EPA has
                                                                             not complied with OMB Memorandum M-
                                                                             07-16 regarding the safeguarding of
                                                                             personally identifiable information.
                                                                                                                                                   Data Source: OMB
Quarterly Management Report
Q1  2008       9
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept '08)
• Q406 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• 0207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
                                                                   • 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
                                                                   •T07 = 2007 FY Target                 • FY = Fiscal Year
                                                                   • T08 = 2008 FY Target                 • N R = Not Reported
                                                                   • TCY = Target Calendar Year            • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                      Administrative Services
                                               Enabling and Support Programs in Strategic Plan
                    Grants Management

 Grant closeouts have historically been noted as an agency weakness. In
 FY07, EPA met its targets for closeouts and has removed this as an agency
 weakness.
FY06 Target
                  % of Eligible Grants Closed Out (EPA)
             -FY06 Grants   «  FYD7 Grants	FY06 Target	FY07 Target
                                                       Data Source: Giants System
                                                                                                    Financial System Modernization Project (FSMP)


                                                                                     ' 55 ^  The Q1 FY 2008 FSMP Earned Value information shows the Schedule
                                                                                            Performance Index (SPI) continuing to decline. The SPI decline is due to the
                                                                                            continued delay in awarding the FSMP contract.

                                                                                                  Financial System Modernization Project Earned Value Management
                                                                                                                                                   Data Source: OCFO
                                                                Small Businesses
 EPA is committed, and on track, to meet its contracting goals related to the
 small business community.

    Total Contract Dollars (Millions) Awarded to Small Businesses
                                                                                        57 )  Nine of ten regions and one program met or exceeded 36% target of
                                                                                             contracting dollars awarded to small business in Q1.


                                                                                                          % of Contract Dollars Awarded to Small Businesses

5
Target
(36%)



09I



£




99
"



6
b




7°f









~





4




l°i




b *




99!



6




59




b

4




09I





2




99(











6



20%
I
49




b


2




99




b 2




89




b a








35%


                                                       Data Source: /CMS
                                                                                                                                                    Data Source: /CMS
                                                             Workforce Recruitment


 Recruiting a talented staff is critical for maintaining the credibility and performance of the Agency.
                              SES Average # of Days
                                                                                                                   General Schedule Average #of Days
         ** No new SES hires duhng Q1 '07
                                                                Data Source: HR System, HR Records
 Maintaining a diverse
 workforce helps the
 Agency achieve its
 mission.
                                                                  Diversity of Workforce
                                                                                                   Hawaiian/Other  Indian/Alaskan    Two or More   Targeted
                                                                                                   Pacific Islander     Native        Races     Diabilities
                             US EPA
                             National
                            :ivilian Labot
                             Force(2000
                             Census)
                                      )ec-07  16,773   6,421  5,201    741   2,390    387    474    491    514

                                         ~5,30?!   74s|   2,44?|   403|    475
                                                 33.51% 30.9'
                                                            4.37% 14.23%   2.35%  2.77%   2.94%  2.97%  0.01
                                                                                        Male  | Female  Male

                                                                                         Number of Employees
                                                                                    Percent of Employees
                                                                                         Percent of Employees
                                                 39.00% 33.70%  4.30%  5.70%   6.20%  4.50%   1.90%  1.70%  0.10%  0.10%  0.30%   0.30%  0.30%   0.30%    2.27%
                                                                                                                                               Data Source: OHR, DOL
Quarterly Management Report      Unless otherwise specified:
0 1  7008                           ' Data is cumulative thm current quarter
L£ I  Z.UUO        i o                . Target ^presents end of fiscal year (Sept
                                                                        • Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)   - Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY - Calendar Year
                                                                        • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)   • T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • FY = Fiscal Year
                                                                        . Q3Q7 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)   f T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • NR = Not Reported
                                 Q4Q6 = Oct '05 thru Sept '06 (data for 12 mos.)    . Q4Q7 = pct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)  ' TCY = Tar9et Calendar Year _ * N/A = Not Applicable

-------