EPA Quarterly  Management  Report
                                  January through March 2008
 Northeast  	1
 Great South 	2
 Midwest 	3
 Great American West 	4
 Islands	4
 Select Regional Priorities
    Tribes	5
    US-Mexico Border	5
 Select National Priorities
    Climate Change and Energy	6
    Air Quality	6
    Water Quality	7
    Enforcement and Compliance
    Assistance  	7
    Chemicals	7
    Best Available Science	8
    Homeland Security	8
    Land Revitalization	8
    Office of Inspector General Audits	8
                         THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.
              "For ine sake of comparison,
              here's a strong trird quarter."
                             Other Activities
                                Congressional Interaction	8
                                Regulatory Paperwork Burden	8
                                Office of Inspector General Operations	8
                                Electronic Data	8
                             Headquarters
                                Timeliness of Key Actions	 9
                                Energy Use at EPA Labs	9
                                President's Management Agenda	9
                             Administrative Services
                                Grants Management	10
                                Financial System Modernization Project	 10
                                Small Businesses	10
                                Workforce Recruitment	10
                                Diversity of Workforce	10
                              What is the Quarterly Management Report?
                              This report shows the US Environmental Protection
                              Agency's progress on selected priorities. It is
                              intended to elicit questions that lead to ideas about
                              how the Agency can better execute our
                              responsibilities under the law and do a better job of
                              protecting human health and the environment. In
                              many cases, measures may be affected by factors
                              outside the Agency's control. Success often relies on
                              working closely with our partners: states, territories
                              and tribes.

                              This report is only one of many budget, performance,
                              and financial tools used by the Agency for
                              management purposes.  It does not include all of the
                              Agency's priorities. The report is a balance of
                              national and regional information. Because it is
                              updated quarterly, most measures are outputs, not
                              outcomes. However, all the measures are linked to
                              objectives in the Agency's Strategic Plan. Performing
                              well on these measures  is assumed to  lead to
                              improved public health and environmental protection.
Quarterly Management Report
Q2 2008
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
• TOY = Target Calendar Year	
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)
• 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)
•T07 = 2007 FY Target
•T08 = 2008 FY Target
•CY= Calendar Year
• FY = Fiscal Year
•NR = Not Reported
•N/A = Not Applicable

-------
Select Regional Priorities
      NORTHEAST
Land Revitalization
Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)
QEPA cleanup efforts complement state and local activities to restore
contaminated properties to environmental and economic vitality. Construction is
more active in spring and summer.
# of Superfund Sites Completed in Northeast


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4


Date Source: CERCLIS

Air Quality: Ozone
Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1. 1 (Outdoor Air)
ฉRedesignations generally show improvement in air quality. 6 of 31 areas
remain eligible for redesignation in the Northeast Regions.
# of Eligible Ozone Non-Attainment Areas Redesignated
Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 TOTAL
Eligible 3 3 25 31
Submitted 2 0 26 28
Q407 Approved 2 0 18 20
Q1 Approved 2 0 22 24
Q2 Approved 2 0 23 25
Data are cumulative across fiscal years „ . „ „ . , T , .
Data Source: Regional Tracking


Water Quality
• Advanced treatment and/or technology limits, addressed through the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), will help reduce
nutrients like nitrogen, a major cause of water impairment in the Northeast.
# of NPDES Permits with Advanced Wastewater Treatment
and/or Technology Forcing Limits for Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2. 2 (Water Quality)
154_^
m 72
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
— ซ— 2007 — •— 2008
Data Source: PCS
ฉThe Chesapeake Bay is a priority. Though non-point sources are a major threat
to the Bay, permitting significant nutrient dischargers helps restore and maintain
water quality.
Chesapeake Bay Significant Discharge Permits
Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.3 (Ecosystems)
# Permits Issued
61
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
-*-2007 2008
# Permits Reviewed
	 __ 	 	 	 *15Q
^_^— — -~*"T26
*"86
10 _.17

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
-•-2007 2008
Date Source: R3 WPD/CBPO

Quarterly Management Report Unless otherwise specified: • Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.) • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.) • CY = Calendar Year
O? 7008 -Data is cumulative thru current quarter • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.) • Q2 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.) • FY = Fiscal Year
V/. /.uuo 1 •Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08) • Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.) • T07 = 2007 FY Target • NR = Not Reported
• TOY = Target Calendar Year . Q4Q7 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 1 2 mos.) ' T08 = 2008 FY Tar9et ' N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                      Select  Regional Priorities
                                                                 GREAT SOUTH
ฉ
                                                             Water Quality

Setting Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) is one of the many tools used before taking further action to reduce nutrient pollution in the Mississippi River and the Gulf
of Mexico.  Regions 3, 5, 7, and 8 joined the Great South in reporting this measure.


                                  Mississippi River Watershed: # of TMDLs Completed in Nutrient Impaired Waters
                                                 Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
                                       FY 08 Target 198
                                                                       Q2
                                                                                           Q3
                                                                                                               Q4
         The 73 actions in support of the Gulf of Mexico Governors' Action Plan will increase
         understanding of environmental risks and coastal resiliency, address cooperation at the
         local, state, and Federal levels, and improve regional coordination.  All projects initiated to
         date (70 of 73) have been completed or are on schedule to be accomplished by 2009.

                                 Gulf of Mexico Near-Term Actions
                             Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.3 (Ecosystems)
                                                                                   ฉ
                I tending f o
                  Initiation
                    37
                    29
                   mpieiec
                    7
Ending for Pending for Fending for
Initiation Initiation Initiation
6
n Schedu
51
I&mplete
16

e C

5
n Schedu
51
I&mpletec
17
B C

3
n Schedu
52
jDmpletec
18
e
                                                                                                            Data Source: PCS, ICIS, Office of Water, Region 6 Internal Data System, NTTS
Over the next three years, 382 TMDLs or equivalent decisions must
be completed in South Florida. Through FY2007, 69 cumulative
decisions have been made.
                                                                                                            South Florida Water Management District:
                                                                                                             # of Decisions Made on Impaired Waters
                                                                                                        Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
Q407 I
69 |
Q1
o
Q2
0
T08
20
                                                                                                                                             Data Source: 303(d) 1st
                                     Q407
                                                        Q1
                                                                             Data Source: GMPO
Air Quality
Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1. 1 (Outdoor Air)
( g ) Timely development and approval of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) will lead to earlier action to address ozone.
# of Months Ahead (Behind) Schedule on Selected Clean Air SIPs

Houston SIP (onscฐedu|e)
Regbn 6
Dallas Fort Worth 0
SIP (on schedule)
Q1 02
0 0
(on schedule) (on schedule)

July 15, 2008: EPA to propose action to approve or disapprove Reasonable Further Progress SIP.
December 15, 2008: EPA to take final action to approve or disapprove Reasonable Further Progress
SIP.
Feb 21, 2008: Meeting with the TCEQ, EPA's OAR, OAQPS and R6 to discuss progress by the State,
0 0 EPA, local governments and partners to strengthen the SIP
(on schedule) (on schedule) July 15, 2008: EPA to propose approval or disapproval of final 8-hour Ozone SIP.
December 1 5, 2008: EPA to take final action to approve or disapprove final 8-hour Ozone SIP.
Data Source: TCEQ SIP Schedule

Quarterly Management Report Unless otherwise specified:
("17 7OOR -Data is cumulative thru current quarter
("i/ ZUUO 2 -Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
• TOY = Target Calendar Year
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.) • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.) • CY = Calendar Year
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.) • Q2 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.) • FY = Fiscal Year
• 0307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.) • T07 = 2007 FY Target • NR = Not Reported
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 1 2 mos.) 8 FY Tar9et ' N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                          Select  Regional Priorities
                                                                           MIDWEST
                               Water Quality

       Nutrients are a major environmental threat to the Mississippi watershed.
       Permitting is the Agency's most direct way to address major dischargers.
      Mississippi River Watershed: # of NPDES Permits issued for Major Municipal and
             Industrial Facilities with Nutrient Limits or Monitoring Requirements
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
   FY 08 Target, 66
                                                    	FY 08 Target
                                                                   Data Source: PCS/ICIS

       Compliance assistance supports and complements permitting efforts aimed at
       reducing nutrient levels.

              Mississippi River Watershed: # of Nutrient Compliance Assistance
            Seminars, Trainings or Presentations given to CAFOs, Municipalities,
                      States or Tribes in the Mississippi Watershed
                   Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1 (Improved Compliance)
                                                                   Data Source: PCS/ICIS

         Working collaboratively with other federal, state and local partners, the Great
         Lakes Initiative is on schedule. 34 of 45 projects are now completed including
         the development of the standardized beach sanitary survey.
                           Great Lakes Near-Term Actions
                      Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.3 (Ecosystems)
             Schedul
              40
                            Off Schedule
                                0
                             n
       Off Schedule
          0
Off Schedule
    0
                             Completed
                               12
                                              in Schedul ;
                                                 32
        Completed
          13
                         n Schedul !
                           11
                                                               Completed
                                                                  34
             0406              0407

Data is cumulative across fiscal years
                                                                    Data Source: GLNPO
                                                                              Air Quality: Ozone
                                                                       Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)

                                                         Redesignations generally show improvement in air quality.
                                                                                                        # of Eligible Ozone Non-Attainment Areas Redesignated

Eligible
Submitted
Q407 Approved
Q1 Approved
Q2 Approved
Region 5
34
33
27
28
28
                                                                                        Data are cumulative across fiscal years
                                                                                                                                              Data Source: Regional Tracking, FREDS
                                                                               Lead Poisoning
                                                         Removing or otherwise controlling lead in housing addresses the primary source
                                                         of childhood lead poisoning. Supplemental Enforcement Projects (SEPs) and
                                                         Judicial settlements have typically driven accomplishments in this area.

                                                                    # of Housing Units Abated/Mitigated for Lead as a
                                                                         Result of Federal Enforcement Actions
                                                                           Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1
                                                                                (Improved Compliance)
                                                                                       FY 08 Target, 350
                                                                                                                                                • FY OS Target
                                                                                                                                                Data Source: ICIS, Manual Tabutetion
                                                   14 )  In some communities the soil around homes poses a risk of causing lead
                                                         poisoning.

                                                            # of Lead-Contaminated Residential Properties Cleaned Up by Superfund
                                                                        Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)
                                                                                                                                                         1,381 i
                           FY 08 Target 700
                                                                                                                                             Data Source: ReqbnalSuperiund Recoris
Quarterly Management Report
Q2 2008        3
Unless otherwise specified:                 '0107 =
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter         . Q207 =
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)    . Q3Q7 =
• TOY = Target Calendar Year	. Q4Q7 =
                       Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
                       Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
                       Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
                       Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)  • FY = Fiscal Year
• T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • N R = Not Reported
• T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                   Select  Regional Priorities
                                                    GREAT AMERICAN  WEST
                                                                   Agriculture
                                                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1 (Improved Compliance)
 15 )  Compliance assistance supports and complements permitting efforts aimed at
      reducing nutrient levels from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
      (CAFOs).


            # of CAFO Entities Reached Through Compliance Assistance
     FY 08 Target 8,305	
16 )  Inspections remain an important tool to address poorly managed livestock
     operations that can pollute rivers, lakes, estuaries and groundwater. The
     number of inspections includes joint EPA/State inspections.
                          # of CAFO Inspections
                                                                           FY 08 Target 82
Target will be increased to 8,425 contingent upon finalization of the CAFO Rule by July 1.

                                                              Data Source: ICIS
                                                                                                                                Data Source; ICIS, ICIS/OTIS/PCS
                                Energy
           Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air) and 2.2 (Water Quality)

      Timely permitting of environmentally sound energy activities contributes to the
      nation's energy security and protects the environment. The number of permits
      includes Underground Injection Control and air-related permits. This measure
      only reports on Region 8 accomplishments.
             # of Oil and Gas Activities for Which EPA Issued a Permit
                                           Data Source; Staff iBcoris and Region 8 programs
                               Mining
  Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land), 4.1 (Chemical, Organism & Pesticide Risks),
                           and 5.2 (Restore Land)
      Abandoned and poorly managed mining sites may threaten rivers, lakes,
      estuaries and groundwater. In the Great American West, EPA regions are
      reclaiming land and protecting the environment through Superfund remedial
      actions and removal actions, Brownfields actions, and voluntary cleanup
      programs.

     # of Acres Addressed (or Cleaned up) by Superfund Remedial, Removal and Non-
                            Regulatory Programs
                                                                                                 Data Source: Staff Reports, Reg/on 8 A/EPA Program, CERCLIS, GPRA Forms
                                                   Select  Regional Priorities
                                                                  ISLANDS
M9 J % of Population with Access to Drinking Water Meeting EPA Standards
D
fc

Region 2 (Puerto Rico)
Region 9 (Pacific Islands)
Q407
36%
59%
Q1
32%
66%
Q2
N/A
N/A
FY08 Target
36%
69%

ata are from the previous quarter due to data reporting constraints. Data
r Puerto Rico represent a 12-month rolling average through 12/31/07.

( 20 J % of Wastewater Treatment Plants in Compliance with
— BOD/TSS/No Bypass Requirements
Region 2 (Virgin Islands)
Region 2 (Puerto Rico)
Region 9 (Pacific Islands)

Q407
70%
70%
79%
Q1
70%
70%
75%
Q2
70%
70%
58%

FY 08 Target
80%
75%
75%


Quarterly Management Report Unless otherwise specified: • Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
O2 2008 -Data is cumulative thru current quarter • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
^ 4 -Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08) • Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• TOY = Target Calendar Year . Q4Q7 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 1 2 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)
• 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.j
•T07 = 2007 FY Target
•T08 = 2008 FY Target
•CY= Calendar Year
• FY = Fiscal Year
•NR = Not Reported
• N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                          Select Regional Priorities
                                                  TRIBES  AND US-MEXICO  BORDER
                            Tribes: Air Quality
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)
       Improving the Title V Air Permit program offers great promise to addressing air
       quality on Tribal lands.

                               # of Title V Air Permits
                             Region 2 Regions  Region 6  Regions Regions Region 10
                      >sued
                      Pending
         No Federally Recognized Tribes in Region 3 No Title V p<
                  or
                 18      2|
                  41      0
                 15      2
                  4      1
                 33      4
     Data Source; Region 5, FREDS, Regbnal Tracking, Internal Reports, Part 71 Program Implementatbn Tracking System
                          Tribes: Water Quality
       Addressing drinking water issues offers great promise for improving health on
       Tribal lands.
          # of Water System Sanitary Surveys Within the Past 3 Years (5 Years for
                               Outstanding Performers)
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.1 (Human Health)
                                                    	FY08 Target
                                Data Source: SDWIS, Regional Tracking, Region 6 and Region 10 Databases

' 23 ^  Current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits
       improve and maintain water quality.

                         # of NPDES Permits Issued and Current
                      Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
                                               Data Source: PCS, ACS, NPDES, BbsoHs Staff, ICIS

            # of LUST Cleanups that Exceed Risk-Based Standards for Human
                 Exposure and Groundwater Migration in Indian Country
                      Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)


           	Data Source:  Regional Reports
                 US-Mexico Border: Land Revitalization
                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.2 (Communities)
 25 )  Removing scrap tires reduces mosquito-borne diseases and fire risk.

                      US-Mexico Border- Tires Removed from Piles
                                                  Data Source; BECC, SEMERNAT, EPA Grantees
                                                                         Tribes: Land Preservation
                                                   2g }  EPA regions support Tribal solid waste management programs including
                                                         actions to address risks associated with open dumps.

                                                            # of Open Dumps Closed, Cleaned Up, or Upgraded in Indian Country
                                                            Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.1 (Preserve Land), 3.2 (Restore Land), and
                                                                   5.3 (Tribal Capacity to Implement Environmental Programs)
                                                                                             0407
                                                                                             707
                  Region 1 Region 2 Region 4 Regions Regions Region 7 Regions  Regions Region 10
                    0003     15      04       82       3
                    0002302       20       2
                                                                  0
                                                                         0
                                                                                0
                                                                                                   NR
                                                                                                                  15
                                                                                                                           1
                                                                                                                                                         19
                                                      lot
                                                      \Q2
                                                      \Tos         o __ g __ g __ 2 __ 2 __ g __ 5 __ 20       1
                                                       Indian Health Service is assessing the sites on reservations and universe is not known. No Federally Recognized Tribes
                                                       in Region 3.
                                                                                    Data Source: IHS Database, Manual Report, Grantee Progress Reports

                                                         Region 10 is supporting Alaskan recycling and safe solid waste disposal practices
                                                         to address health and environmental risks. During Q2, over 116,000 pounds of
                                                         recyclables were diverted from village dumps in  Region 10.

                                                                                 Alaska Village Solid Waste
                                                                       Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3. 1 (Preserve Land) and
                                                                      5.3 (Tribal Capacity to Implement Environmental Programs)
                                                                                                             Lbs. of Recyclables Dverted from Village Dumps

                                                                                                                                      164,811
                                                                        Lbs. of Trash Collected for Proper Disposal
                                                                                                                                Data Source: RurAL CAP Grants, /GAP Proposals Master Log
                                                                     US-Mexico Border: Water Quality
                                                                      Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.2 (Communities)

                                                         One goal of the U. S. -Mexico Border Program is to provide protection of people
                                                         in the U.S.-Mexico border area from health risks by increasing the number of
                                                         homes connected to potable water supply and wastewater collection and
                                                         treatment systems. EPA is addressing this through financial assistance for new
                                                         infrastructure and technical assistance. Data is typically reported later in fiscal
                                                         year.
                                                                Additional Homes Served by Improvements in Water Services
                                                                              Drinking Water (Regions 6 & 9)
                                                  FY08 Target 2,500-
                                                                                                                       .2008	•	2007	FYOSTarg
                                                                                                                    Sewer Systems (Regions 6 S 9]
                                                                                              FY08 Target 15,000
                                                                                                                              -2007	FYOSTar
                                                                                                                                                     Data Source: NADB Reporting
Quarterly Management Report
Q2 2008        5
Unless otherwise specified:                 '0107 =
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter         . Q207 =
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)    . Q3Q7 =
• TOY = Target Calendar Year	. Q4Q7 =
Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)  • FY = Fiscal Year
• T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • N R = Not Reported
• T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                               Select  National  Priorities
                                                                     Climate Change and Energy
       ENERGY STAR helps individuals and organizations reduce energy use, save
       money, and prevent greenhouse gas emissions. The numbers below represent
       estimated incremental savings attributable to the program as a result of activities
       occurring in Fiscal Year 2008. They are in addition to savings from actions
       taken prior to October 1, 2007.
       ENERGY STAR: Additional Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoided and Cost Savings
                  Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5 (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)
                                                                                             Benchmarking building energy use allows building owners and operators to monitor
                                                                                             energy use and target efficiency improvements. This measure is reported in terms of
                                                                                             square footage rather than the number of buildings. Regions differ in their prioritization
                                                                                             and, therefore, accomplishments related to this specific voluntary program.

                                                                                                             ENERGY STAR: Square Footage of Buildings Rated (in Millions)
                                                                                                             Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5 (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)
                 $0.2

                 „<
Q1
Q2
Region
187
282
1 Region
278
440
2 Region 3
370
~| 534
Regior
562
679
4 Regior
524
808
5 Region
363
| 498
5 Regior
103
1 143"
7 Region
112
~| 143
Region 9
495
"I 664
Regi
14
                                                                                                                                                              Data Source: Energy Star
                                                                      $0.80
                                                                       #-
                                                                                             EPA continues to lead work to complete a government-wide Climate Change
                                                                                             Science Program (CCSP) report on coastal elevation and sea level rise.

                                                                                                         # of Months Ahead (Behind) on Select Climate Change Activities
                                                                                                               Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.4 (Science & Research)
                                                                                                                         Coastal Elevation and Sensitivity to Sea Level Rise
                     3 Estimated GHG Emissions A \-oided from New Actions Taken (in MMTCE)

                     - Estimated Net Savings from New Actions Taken (in billions)
                                                                                                      Upcoming
                                                                                                      Milestones
                                                                                                                  SAP 4.1 went out for public comment on Feb 25th. The public comment
                                                                                                                  period ends April 10th.
                                                                                                                Q3 activities include assimilating public comments and submitting revisions
                                                                                                                to the Federal Advisory Committee.
                                                              Data Source: OAR Analysis

         SmartWay works with the transportation and freight sectors to reduce
         GHG emissions and reduce costs.
     SmartWay: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
           Avoided and Cost Savings
        Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5
            (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)
                                             $1.3
                                                                       $0.9
                                                             Data Source: Gbbal Change Research Program
             Alaskan people and habitat will likely be more sensitive to changes due to a
             warming climate than other parts of the U.S. This measure has been met and
             all scheduled projects have been completed.

                     # of Collaborative Alaska Climate Change Events/Projects
                        Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.6 (Science & Research)
           Q107
                       Q207
                                   Q307
                                               Q407
                                                                       Q2
        ] Estimated GHG Emissions Avoided (in MMTCE)
                                                     Estimated Net Savings (in billions)
                                                                                                                                                    Data Source: R10 Climate Change Team

                                                                                                 Methane to Markets is an international public-private partnership to advance the
                                                                                                 recovery and use of methane as a clean energy source.
                                                                                                             Key Methane to Markets Quarterly Milestones Met
                                                                                                          Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.5 (Greenhouse Gas Intensity)
                                                                                                                Methane to Markets (M2M) achieved ten milestones in FY08 Q2, bringing the total number o1
                                                                                                                milestones achieved up to 14 of the 34 identified for FY08. A key accomplishment for Q2 was
                                                                                                                a successful EPA sponsored M2M outreach event at the Washington International
                                                                                                                Renewable EnergyConference (WIREC) Meeting in Washington, DC. The meeting was
                                                                                                                highlighted by the European Union Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs signing the
                                                                                                                Partnership Terms of Reference, making official the Commission's status as Partner.
                                              ata Source: FLEET Model, SmartWay Database
                                                                                                                                                  Data Source: ASG Schedule of Key Milestones
                                                                          Best Available Science
                                                                  Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.4 (Science & Research)
       EPA is working to finalize and begin implementing the new Integrated Risk
       Information System (IRIS) process. The final version of the revised process
       will be released and a public workshop will be held to discuss the revised
       process.
                                                                                                 Research labs continue to achieve good results related to meeting their key
                                                                                                 management objectives.
                                                                                                            % of Key Research Management Objectives On Schedule
                                                                                                                       EPA Labs and Research Centers
# of Months Ahead
(Behind) Schedule

     IRIS-
   Update of
    Process
                               t of Months Ahead (Behind) Schedule
ead
dule
Of
s

0407
(10)

01
(13)

02
(16)

TO 8
0

EPฃ
proc
inte
                                                    Accomplishing:.;,_,. Upcoming Milestones
                                             EPA continues to work with OMB on enhancements to the
                                             process. When the revised process has completed Agency
                                             [internal review, a public workshop will be announced and held
                                               2008 to discuss the revised process.
                                                                        Date Source: ORD

National Exposure Research Lab (NERL)
National Health & Environmental Effects Research Lab (NHEERL)
National Risk Management Research Lab (NRMRL)
National Centerfor Computational Toxicology (NCCTj
National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
National Center for Environmental Research (NCER)
National Home/and Security Research Center (NHSRC)
Immediate Office of the Assistant Administrator (IOAA)
Q407
100%
100%
100%
50%
89%
92%
100%
NR
Q1 I
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
95%
100%
100% |
02 I
100%
98%
100%
100%
96%
89%
100%
67%
                                                                                                                                                         Data Source: ORD's IRMS database
                                                                                     Air Quality
                                                                        Links to Strategic Plan Objective 1.1 (Outdoor Air)

         Old diesel engines are a major source of soot and these projects are an extremely cost-effective way to improve air quality.
                             # of Emission Reduction Projects
                                                                                                                           # of Diesel Engines Affected
                                                                               Data Source: NCDD
— ซ— 2007
—•—2008
Quarterly Management Report
Q2 2008        6
                                       Unless otherwise specified:
                                       • Data is cumulative thru current quarter
                                       • Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
                                       • TOY = Target Calendar Year	
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)  • FY = Fiscal Year
• T07 = 2007 FY Target                   • N R = Not Reported
• T08 = 2008 FY Target                   • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                               Select National Priorities  (continued)
                                                                        Water Quality
                                                             Links to Strategic Plan Objective 2.2 (Water Quality)
         EPA approval of revised standards establishes updated goals for water quality
         protection programs.
       % of State/Territorial Water Quality Standards Revisions Approved by EPA
FY08 Target, 74%
                                                39 )  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting is one of the
                                                      most direct tools EPA has to address water quality issues. The priority permits
                                                      initiative was created to prioritize the issuance of the most environmentally
                                                      significant permits. Progress on this measure begins in January of each year.

                                                              % of High Priority State NPDES Permits that are Issued as Scheduled
                                                                                               FY 08 Target 95%
                                                      Q3
                                       -2008
                                                             • FY08 Target
                                                                                                                                                - FY 08 Target
                                                                  Data Source: WATA
                            Number of TMDLs that are Established or Approved by EPA [Total TMDLs] on a Schedule Consistent with National Policy
                                                                                                                                       Data Source: PCS, ICIS, and Internal Sources
                   Region 1     Region 2    Region 3    Region 4     Region 5     Regions 6     Region 7
                    5,396          8          16          59          6           8            4
            Q2      5,411         90          324          298          82          73            172
                                                                    Region 8       Regions 9     Region 10
                                                                        0              25           123
                                                                       12             48           221
       Note: A TMDL is a technical plan for reducing pollutants in order to attain water quality standards.  The terms 'approved' and 'established'refer to the completion of the TMDL itself.
                                                        Enforcement and  Compliance Assistance
                                                           Links to Strategic Plan Objective 5.1 (Improved Compliance)
         Vigorously enforcing environmental laws continues to be a critical component of EPA efforts. Compliance assistance continues to be an effective complement to enforcement.
                                                                 Enforcement and Compliance Assistance

Number of Civil Referrals
Estimated Lbs of Pollution Reduced (Millions)
$ Invested in Pollution Control as Result of Enforcement (Billions)
% of Compliance Assistance recipients improving practices
Q407
278
890
10.6
91%
Q1
17
988
7.8
95%
Q2
71
2,364
9.2
87%
T08
N/A
890
4.3
50%
                                                                                                                                                         Data Source: ICIS
  Pesticide program is
     on target for
    phasing out old
    review process
  (complete remaining
     non-food use
     Reregistration
  Eligibility Decisions
   [REDs] by end of
        FY08).
                                                                           Chemicals
                                                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 4.1 (Chemical, Organism & Pesticide Risks)
                                                    	Pipeline for Reviewing Registered Pesticides	
                                                                          2nd Quarter FY 2008 as of March 31, 2008
                                  SNon-food REDs remaning - projected
                                  Non-food REDs remaining - actual
                                n Dockets - Projected
                                  Dockets -Actual
          2ndQtr          3rd Qtr

                 2007
                                                                                                                  Data Source: OPPIN
       The Pesticide Registration Improvement Act (PRIA) provides
       reduced timeframes for completing registration decisions. Since
       Q1 FY06 OPPTS has achieved a minimum 99.7% on time record.
  Pesticide Registration Improvement Act: Applications Received, Completed,
     Pending, Percent Negotiated, and Percent On Time at End of Quarter
Received
Completed (includes withdrawn)
% of completed and withdrawn decisions with negotiated due dates
% on time (completed on or before PRIA or negotiated due da te)
Total Pending
Q407
1,722
1,756
14%
100.0%
1,207
Q1
380
507
17%
99.8%
1,087
Q2
779
998
17%
99.8%
1,023
                                     Cumulative number of HPV (High Production Volume) Hazard Characterizations (HCs) was revised
                                     downward because some chemicals assessed through the Organization for Economic Cooperation
                                     and Development (OECD) Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) process were determined to be
                                     outside the scope of the US HPV program.  Also, resources are being redirected toward production of
                                     Risk-Based Prioritization because more HPV HCs have been produced than are needed at this stage.
                                     FY'08 End Of Year (EOY) target for HPV HCs will not be met (revised expected EOY target is 205).
                                     HPV and MPV (Moderate Production Volume) Prioritization activities remain  on target.

                                                 Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) Commitments for High Production
                                                     Volume (HPV) and Moderate Production Volume (MPV) Chemicals

Cumulative number of High Production Volume (HPV)
chemicals with Risk Based Prlorltlzatlons completed.
Cumulative number of Moderate Production Volume
(MPV) chemicals with Hazard Based Prlorltlzatlons
completed.
Total HPV Chemicals with Screening Level Hazard
Characterization Reports Completed.
Q407
NR
NR
301
Q1
15
0
27
Q2
19
0
85
T08
150
55
329
                                                         Data Source: OPPIN
                                                                                                                              Data Source: HPV Program Screening Phase Tracking Files
Quarterly Management Report
Q2 2008        7
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
• TOY = Target Calendar Year	
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)  • FY = Fiscal Year
• T07 = 2007 FY Target                 • N R = Not Reported
• T08 = 2008 FY Target                 • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                               Select  National Priorities  (continued)
                                                               and  Other Activities
                                        Enabling and Support Programs in Strategic Plan (unless specified)
                                                                      Homeland Security
                                                              Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)

         EPA plays an important role in responding to natural disasters and emergencies.  To prepare for these events, EPA is actively training staff and conducting exercises.

                       Training Attendance                                                                           Exercises
                                                                                                                                               Date Source; Regional Reports
                                                                      Land Revitalization
       EPA cleanup efforts complement state and local activities to restore contaminated
       properties to environmental and economic vitality. Data collection typically lags for
       this measure.

          # of Brown fields Assessments and Superfund Constructions Completed
            Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land) and 4.2 (Communities)
    Brownfields Properties Assessed
    Superfund Constructions Completed
     Q407
     2,399
      24
Q1
NR
 1
Q2      T08
68     1,000
 1       30
                                                     Restoring contaminated properties reduces potential exposures to hazardous
                                                     wastes.
                                                                   Human Exposures Controlled at High Priority Sites
                                                                     Links to Strategic Plan Objective 3.2 (Restore Land)
Number of high priority RCRA facilities with human
exposures under control
Number of Superfund, including Federal facilities,
hazardous waste sites with human exposures under
control

jman 1
as,
under
Q407
84
13
Q1
2
26
Q2 T08
19 49
17
10
Final FY 2007 Brownfields results now available.  Due to grantee
reporting cycle, only one month ofFY 2008 data is currently available.
                                                                 Data Source; ACRES, CERCLIS
                                                     "Undercontrol" indicates that EPA or state officials have determined that there are no unacceptable human exposures to
                                                     contamination (present above appropriate risk-based levels) that can be reasonably expected under current land- and
                                                     water-use condiions.

                                                    	Data Source: CERCLIS, RCRAInfo
                                                           Office of Inspector General Audits
                                                                  Tracking of Audit Follow-up Actions
          EPA in

Total Number of Active Audits being tracked
# of Audits in which the NPM/Region Did Not Reach Agreements on
Corrective Actions within 180 days.
# of Audits in which the NPM/ Region Did not Complete Corrective
Actions or Collect All Costs in Full within 365 days.
OA
9
0

0

OAR
10
4

2

OARM*
116
40

4

OCFO
13
0

2

OECA
10
1

4

OEI
7
0

0

OIA
0
0

0

OPPTS
9
1

3

ORD
2
0

0

OSWER
17
1

11

ow
14
1

5

R1
5
2

3

R2
20
11

1

R3
9
0

1

R4
6
0

0

R5
15
0

1

R6
5
0

0

R7
2
0

0

R8
14
4

0

R9
21
0

1

R10
9
0

10

Total
313
65

48

     * includes OAM and GAD
                                                                                                                                                  Data Source: IGOR, MATS
                       Congressional Interaction

       Constructive interactions with Congress ensure appropriate tools and
       resources are available for protecting human health and the environment.

          Timeliness of Correspondence (average # of correspondence overdue)
I 1
Overdue Correspondence |
Q407 1
1 I
Q1
0.7
Q2
0.62
                                                                  Date Source: CMS
                                                                  Regulatory Paperwork Burden

                                                     EPA tracks the paperwork burden associated with its actions.

                                                                       Paperwork Burden (millions of hours)
                                                                                           FY'02    FY'03
                                                                                           140.7    144.9
                                                                                                            FV04     pros
                                                                                                                              FY'06
                                                                       r i vt     r i uu     r i vv
                                                                       142.3  I   143.9  I    145.5
                                                                                    FY'07
                                                                                    150.2
                                                                                    FY '08    Target
                                                                                    146.6     143.9
                                                                                                                                         Data Source; OMB Report of Active ICRs
                Office of Inspector General Operations
       EPA improves programs and addresses weaknesses by responding to and
       implementing recommendations arising from reports and investigations by the
       Office of Inspector General.
                                                                             Electronic Data
                                                     Taking advantage of the information age offers great opportunity for cost-savings
                                                     and increased transparency. All 50 states and 8 Tribes are now participating in the
                                                     Exchange Network.
            DIG Audit Operations
            Questioned Costs
            Recommended Efficiencies


          $56,300,0001 $1,020,000  $2,250,000
          $33,900,000|  $150,000   $22,800,000

Fines and recoveries
Indctments and convictions
Civil Judgments/Settlements/Filings
Administrative actons against EPA empbyees/firms
0407
$ 5,033,129
10
4
68
01
$ 1,360,000
17
3
17
02
$ 3,450,000
26
3
32
Exchange Network
# of States Flowing Data
* of Tribes Fixing Data
Central Data Exchange
Transactions Inbound
Transactions Outbound**
CDX Total
Q407
50
7
Q407
21,023
578,826
599,849
Q1 Q2
50 I 50 I
7 	 8
Q1 Q2
18,096 24,172
412,276 424,644

                                                             Data Source: IGOR, PMRS
                                                                                                                                                           Data Source:
                                                                                                                                                exchangeneiwork.net and CDX
                                                                                                                                                Archives 1 and 5, Node Archive
Quarterly Management Report
Q2 2008        8
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
• TOY = Target Calendar Year	
                       • Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
                       • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
                       • Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
                       • 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
                                                     • 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
                                                     • 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)  • FY = Fiscal Year
                                                     • T07 = 2007 FY Target                  • N R = Not Reported
                                                     • T08 = 2008 FY Target                  • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                                 HEADQUARTERS
                             Average Number of Days Ahead (Behind) for
                               DA Priority Actions (beginning 1/1/2007)
       On


     -10-


     -20-
                                                      Timeliness of Key Actions
Completing actions ahead of schedule means EPA keeps its commitments, improves the quality of decisions, and the public and environment benefit from EPA's key actions
sooner. EPA is working on getting the actions furthest behind back on track.
                                                                                          Of the 30 actions being tracked against internal
                                                                                            milestones, the following 16 actions accounted for the
                                                                                            days behind schedule as of 3/31/2008.

                                                                                          OAR
                                                                                          • Disposal in Yucca Mountain, NV
                                                                                          • National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Lead
                                                                                          • New Source Review - Emissions Test for Electric Generating Units
                                                                                          • Renewable Fuels Standard Program
                                                                                          • Revisions to the Definition of Potential to Emit

                                                                                          OPPTS
                                                                                          • Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions
                                                                                          • Certification of Pesticide Applicators (Revisions)
                                                                                          • Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program - Test Validation
                                                                                          • Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program - Draft List of Initial
                                                                                            Chemicals to be Screened
                                                                                          • Lead-Based Paint Activities - Renovation, Repair & Painting

                                                                                          OW
                                                                                          • Affordability Guidance
                                                                                          • Contaminate Candidate List 2  Regulatory Determinations
                                                                                          • Concentrated Animal Feeding  Operation Rule
                                                                                          • Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Airport Deicing
                                                                                            Operations
                                                                                          • Implementation Guidance for Methylmercury Water Quality Criterion
                                                                                          • Water Transfers Rule

                                                                                            *This chart reflects timeliness in relation to internal milestones only and is not
                                                                                             intended to indicate compliance with any mandatory duties or deadlines.

                                                                                                                                        Data Source: SCOUT Database
     -70-


     -80-


     -90-


     -100-
                                                                Energy Use at EPA Labs

       Saving energy at EPA facilities helps increase energy security, reduce pollution and cut greenhouse gas emissions. Region 5 has no EPA owned labs.

                                                       Increase (Decrease) in Amount of Energy Consumed in MMBTUs
          Oct 2006-Mar 2007
          Oct 2007-Mar 2008
                           Region 1  Region 2  Regions Region 4 Regions  Regions  Region 7 Regions  Regions Region 10 HQ-ORD  HQ-OAR  HQ-OARM
                           10,103    18,361     34,169    11,074      N/A     10,124    9,788    11,229    9,703     10,967   105,396   33,545    390,573
                           10,596    18,444   |  34,062    10,654      N/A     9,557     11,319    11,976    10,569     11,769   109,885   31,139    382,862
        FY 07 Increase (Decrease)
          compared with FY 06
                             493
                                       83
                                                (107)
(420)
                                                                    N/A
(567)
1,531
                                                                                                747
                                                                                                          866
                                                                                                                    802
4,489
(2,406)
(7,711)
HQ-ORD includes data from the following labs: Edison, Athens, Narragansett, Corvallis, Gulf Breeze, Ada, Gross lie, Duluth, Newport and Las Vegas
HQ-OAR includes data from the following labs: Ann Arbor, and Montgomery
HQ-OARM includes data from the following labs: RTF * New Main, RTF * NCC, RTF * Human Studies, RTF * NHEERL, RTF * Page Road, RTF * Burden/Jenkins, RTF * Childcare,
RTF * Incinerator/Waste Handling, Cincinnati * AWBERC, Cincinnati * Test & Eval, Cincinnati * Center Hill, Cincinnati * Pub Warehouse, Cincinnati * Child Dev. Ctr
                                                                                                                                                lource: Utitty Bills
                                                           President's Management Agenda

                                                                                                                                                    e. Earning a
       "green" score in these five areas addresses significant government-wide deficiencies identified by the Government Accountability Office, Inspectors General, the Office of
       Management and Budget, and others. For Q2 FY 2008 EPA continues to achieve the highest score possible on the PMA: 5 "greens" on all 5 government-wide initiatives.
Environmental Protection Agency
PMA Initiative
Human Capital
Competitive Sourcing
Financial Performance
E-Government*
Performance Improvement
Initiative
Eliminating Improper Payments
(first reported Q1 2005)
2"ฐ Quarter Results -
March 31, 2007
Status
0
3
e
e
ฉt
e
Progress
O
e
e
e
o
o
2™ Quarter Results -
March 31, 2008
Status
o
e
o
o
o
e
Progress
Q
e
e
e
o
e
                                                                                                                                                      Data Source: OMB
Quarterly Management Report
Q2  2008        9
                              Unless otherwise specified:
                              • Data is cumulative thru current quarter
                              • Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
                              • TCY = Target Calendar Year	
           •0107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
           • Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
           • Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
           • Q407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
                              • Q1 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
                              • Q2 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)  • FY = Fiscal Year
                              • T07 = 2007 FY Target                 • N R = Not Reported
                              • T08 = 2008 FY Target                 • N/A = Not Applicable

-------
                                                         Administrative  Services
                                                  Enabling and Support Programs in Strategic Plan
                         Grants Management

' 56 ^  Grant closeouts have historically been noted as an agency weakness. In
       FY07, EPA met its targets for closeouts and has removed this as an agency
       weakness.
                      % of Eligible Grants Closed Out (EPA)
                -FY06 Grants   ซ   FY07 Grants	FY06 Target	FY07 Target
                                                          Data Source: Giants System
                                                           Financial System Modernization Project (FSMP)


                                                    ฎThe Q2 FY 2008 FSMP Earned Value information shows the Schedule
                                                    Performance Index (SPI) continuing to decline due to the continued delay in
                                                    awarding the FSMP contract. EPA resolved the FSMP contract issues in April
                                                    and plans to rebaseline the project in  Q3 FY 2008.

                                             1-30  "I        Financial System Modernization Project Earned Value Management

                                             1.20  -

                                             1.10  -

                                             1.00  -

                                             0.90  -

                                             0.80  -
                                                                                 0.70
                                                                                                 Cost Performance Index
                                                                                                                         - - - • Schedule Performance Index
                                                                                                                                                 Data Source: OCFO
                                                                  Small Businesses
 58 )  EPA is committed, and on track, to meet its contracting goals related to the
 ^^  small business community.

         Total Contract Dollars (Millions) Awarded to Small Businesses
                                                59  )  Eight of ten regions and two programs met or exceeded the 36% target of
                                                     contracting dollars awarded to small business in Q2.

                                                                 % of Contract Dollars Awarded to Small Businesses

                                                                                77%

4
Target
(39.8%)



6ฐ,-



0



2ฐ/







~




63%
14™






29%












~





36%



—


31%






-





43%
l~~| 37% 37%

2

n






30%
23%
n
II










                                                          Data Source: /CMS
                                                                                                                                                  Data Source: /CMS
                                                                Workforce Recruitment


k 60 J  Recruiting a talented staff is critical for maintaining the credibility and performance of the Agency.

                              SES Average # of Days

                0
         Target 70 |
                                                                            General Schedule Average #of Days
                                                            Target 45
         ** No new SES ft/res during Q1 '07
                                                                  Data Source: HR System, HR Records
       Diversity of
       experience
       leads to better
       decision
       making.
                                                                    Diversity of Workforce

US EPA
National
Civilian Labor
Force(2000

Mar-08
Mar-07
TOTAL
16,699
16,953

Mar-08|
Mar-0?|
White
Male

6,412
6,527

Female

5,170
5,242

38.40% 30.96%
38.50%
30.92%
Black
Male
Female

740
742

4.43%
4.38%
2,372
2,417

14.20%
14.26%
Hispanic
Male
Female

387
394
471
473

2.32%
2.32%
2.82%
2.79%
Asian
Male
Female
Native American
Hawaiian/Other Indian/Alaskan
Pacific Islander Native
Male Female | Male
Number of Employees
584
505
510
511
5
2
Percent of Employees
3.50%
3.05%
0.03%
2.98%| 3.01%| 0.01%
Female
Two or More
Races
Male

6
3

0.04%
0.02%
58
58
69
74
7
1

0.35%
0.34%
0.41%
0.44%
0.04%
0.01%
Female

8
4

0.05%
0.02%
Targeted
Diabilities


175
182

1 .05%
1 .07%
Percent of Employees
Dec-0o|
39.00%
33.70%
4.80%
5.70%
6.20%
4.50%
1 .90%
1 70%
0.10%
0.10%
0.30%
0.30%
0.80%
0.80%
2.27%
                                                                                                                                             Data Source: OHR, DOL
Quarterly Management Report
Q2 2008        10
Unless otherwise specified:
• Data is cumulative thru current quarter
• Target represents end of fiscal year (Sept 08)
• TOY = Target Calendar Year	
• Q107 = Oct '06 thru Dec '06 (data for 3 mos.)
• Q207 = Oct '06 thru Mar '07 (data for 6 mos.)
• Q307 = Oct '06 thru Jun '07 (data for 9 mos.)
• 0407 = Oct '06 thru Sept '07 (data for 12 mos.)
• 01 = Oct '07 thru Dec '07 (data for 3 mos.)  • CY = Calendar Year
• 02 = Oct '07 thru Mar '08 (data for 6 mos.)  • FY = Fiscal Year
• T07 = 2007 FY Target                 • N R = Not Reported
• T08 = 2008 FY Target                 • N/A = Not Applicable

-------