j
\
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Inspector General
11-R-0519
August 24, 2011
, At a Glance
Why We Did This Review
We conducted this audit to
determine whether the U.S.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and selected
states are sufficiently
overseeing Clean Water State
Revolving Fund (CWSRF)
projects that were funded by
the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA), to ensure that project
goals and ARRA requirements
are met.
Background
The CWSRF Program
received $4 billion of ARRA
funding for states to finance
high-priority infrastructure
projects needed to ensure
clean water. EPA made
ARRA grants to states and
Puerto Rico to capitalize their
State Revolving Fund
programs to finance eligible
high-priority water
infrastructure projects.
For further information,
contact our Office of
Congressional, Public Affairs
and Management at
(202)566-2391.
The full report is at:
www.epa.qov/oiq/reports/2011/
20110824-11-R-0519.pdf
Catalyst for Improving the Environment
EPA and States Should Strengthen Oversight of Clean
Water State Revolving Fund Recovery Act Projects
What We Found
State oversight of CWSRF projects does not always ensure subrecipient
compliance with ARRA. We found that some states were not conducting adequate
oversight of subrecipient compliance with the Buy American provisions of ARRA,
and the frequency of inspections of ARRA-funded CWSRF projects varied among
states. EPA oversight guidance to the states is not detailed enough to ensure
compliance with ARRA requirements. EPA believes that it lacks statutory
authority to place requirements on states and gives states flexibility to implement
their programs. However, if states do not conduct proper oversight, projects are at
increased risk of fraud, waste, and abuse, and are also at risk for not complying
with ARRA requirements or achieving ARRA's economic recovery goals.
EPA's oversight of states does not ensure that ARRA requirements are met on
CWSRF projects. We found that the ARRA inspection checklist does not include
enough detailed questions to facilitate EPA oversight of state programs. Further,
the Office of Water is not conducting and documenting reviews of state programs
in a timely manner and does not use the resulting review reports to make national
program decisions. Office of Water management did not make completion of the
review reports a priority and did not use all of the ARRA funding Congress
allocated for oversight. As a result, the EPA oversight process cannot ensure that
states are complying with program requirements and identifying nationwide issues
to improve the CWSRF program.
What We Recommend
We recommend that EPA implement a plan to supplement state inspections and
require states to use an updated checklist during their inspections. We recommend
that EPA update the checklists regions use for semiannual reviews of state
programs and establish deadlines for completing the reviews. We also recommend
that EPA analyze the reviews of state programs for nationwide trends and use the
information to assist in making future program decisions. In responding to the
draft report, EPA did not agree with all of our recommendations and provided
alternative corrective actions for some. The Agency did not provide planned
completion dates for the recommendations. For this reason, the recommendations
are unresolved. In responding to the final report, the Agency will need to provide
a corrective action plan and milestone dates for completion.
------- |