United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31) SO2 Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) SO2 Chang* (tons) . <1,000 • 1,000 to 10,000 • 10,000 to 25,000 • Over 25,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30) SO2 Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) SO2 Chang* (tons) . <1,000 • 1,000 to 10,000 • 10,000 to 25,000 • Over 25,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30) SO2 Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) SO2 Chang* (tons) . <1,000 • 1,000 to 10,000 • 10,000 to 25,000 • Over 25,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31) SO2 Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) SO, Rat* Chang* (%) . <50% • 50% to 85% • Over 85% Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30) SO2 Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) SO, Rat* Chang* (%) . <50% • 50% to 85% • Over 85% Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30) SO2 Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) SO, Rat* Chang* (%) . <50% • 50% to 85% • Over 85% Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31) NOX Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) \ "• • j •\ -. r • NOX Change (tons) . < 1,000 • 1,000 to 10,000 • 10,000 to 25,000 • Over 25,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30) NOX Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) NOX Change (tons) . < 1,000 • 1,000 to 10,000 • 10,000 to 25,000 • Over 25,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30) NOX Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) NOX Change (tons) . < 1,000 • 1,000 to 10,000 • 10,000 to 25,000 • Over 25,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31) NOX Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) \ "• • j •\ -. r • NOX Rate Change (%) . <50% • 50% to 85% • Over 85% Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30) NOX Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) NOX Rate Change (%) . <50% • 50% to 85% • Over 85% Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30) NOX Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) NOX Rate Change (%) . <50% • 50% to 85% • Over 85% Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31) Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) Heat Input Chang* (mmBtu) . < 1,000,000 * 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 * 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 • Over 10,000,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30) Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) Heat Input Chang* (mmBtu) . < 1,000,000 * 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 * 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 • Over 10,000,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- United States Environmental Protection Agency 2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30) Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only) Heat Input Chang* (mmBtu) . < 1,000,000 * 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 * 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 • Over 10,000,000 Decrease Increase Not Large Change Source: 2008 data ai preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will update maps as it corrects data over time. Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location. ------- |