United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31)
SO2 Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
SO2 Chang* (tons)
. <1,000
• 1,000 to 10,000
• 10,000 to 25,000
• Over 25,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30)
SO2 Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
SO2 Chang* (tons)
. <1,000
• 1,000 to 10,000
• 10,000 to 25,000
• Over 25,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already
have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions
data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30)
SO2 Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
SO2 Chang* (tons)
. <1,000
• 1,000 to 10,000
• 10,000 to 25,000
• Over 25,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31)
SO2 Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
SO, Rat* Chang* (%)
. <50%
• 50% to 85%
• Over 85%
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30)
SO2 Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
SO, Rat* Chang* (%)
. <50%
• 50% to 85%
• Over 85%
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already
have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions
data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30)
SO2 Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
SO, Rat* Chang* (%)
. <50%
• 50% to 85%
• Over 85%
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31)
NOX Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
\ "• • j
•\ -. r •
NOX Change (tons)
. < 1,000
• 1,000 to 10,000
• 10,000 to 25,000
• Over 25,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30)
NOX Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
NOX Change (tons)
. < 1,000
• 1,000 to 10,000
• 10,000 to 25,000
• Over 25,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already
have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions
data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30)
NOX Emissions Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
NOX Change (tons)
. < 1,000
• 1,000 to 10,000
• 10,000 to 25,000
• Over 25,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31)
NOX Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
\ "• • j
•\ -. r •
NOX Rate Change (%)
. <50%
• 50% to 85%
• Over 85%
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30)
NOX Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
NOX Rate Change (%)
. <50%
• 50% to 85%
• Over 85%
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already
have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions
data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30)
NOX Emissions Rate Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
NOX Rate Change (%)
. <50%
• 50% to 85%
• Over 85%
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data are final, 2010 are
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 1 (January 1- March 31)
Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
Heat Input Chang* (mmBtu)
. < 1,000,000
* 1,000,000 to 5,000,000
* 5,000,000 to 10,000,000
• Over 10,000,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the first quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported first quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 2 (April 1- June 30)
Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
Heat Input Chang* (mmBtu)
. < 1,000,000
* 1,000,000 to 5,000,000
* 5,000,000 to 10,000,000
• Over 10,000,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the second quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2010; many facilities already
have advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported second quarter 2010 emissions
data to EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
2008 vs 2010 Comparisons, Quarter 3 (July 1- September 30)
Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units Only)
Heat Input Chang* (mmBtu)
. < 1,000,000
* 1,000,000 to 5,000,000
* 5,000,000 to 10,000,000
• Over 10,000,000
Decrease
Increase
Not Large Change
Source: 2008 data ai
preliminary data submitted to EPA from
sources as of November 2, 2010. EPA will
update maps as it corrects data over time.
Note: This map displays changes occurring between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2010; many facilities already have
advanced controls and low emission rates and therefore show no change. If a unit has not yet reported third quarter 2010 emissions data to
EPA, it is not included in this map. Multiple facilities at a single location are dispersed to show all facilities at that location.
------- |