Case Study
    14
  0)
 88
  O  ,M
   O.
  (0
       o
      0.
  March
   2005
            WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION
               POWER PLANT FOUNDATION EVALUATION
                        ROTHSCHILD, WISCONSIN

       Wisconsin Public Service Corporation - Weston #4 - New Plant Construction

The plans for the construction of the new Wisconsin Public Service Corporation power plant,
Weston #4, required stabilizing approximately 10 feet of granular material with Class 'C' fly
ash providing a foundation platform for footing construction with a minimum bearing
capacity of 400 psi.  This design concept had been under consideration as an alternative to
piling or caissons beneath the new footings.  Significant savings in both cost and construction
time were anticipated if the desired  strengths could be achieved by stabilizing the native
materials.

Mix designs were validated through a series of laboratory design tests. Maxim Technologies
of Wausau, WI working with the contractor, James Peterson Sons, Inc. prepared a number of
mix design samples for the project.  Moisture/density and strength/moisture curves were
plotted to determine optimum parameters at various ash and moisture contents. Design
strengths were achieved at 20-25%  fly ash and 6-8% total moisture. This application is one
of the first of its kind using class C  fly ash to stabilize granular soils in deep foundation
construction.

The Planned Approach

The design firm, Black & Veatch, Inc. along  with the WPSC engineering team, discussed the
notion of providing a native soil platform under the  footings for the new plant using WPS
produced class C fly ash as a stabilizing/strengthening agent over a year ago. Many issues
were evaluated regarding engineering properties, construction techniques, application and a
host of other elements.  Once the conclusion was reached that fly ash stabilized [FAS]
material could produce the desired strength and load distribution characteristics, the
construction methods became the focal point.

The concept for the project was to excavate 15-17 feet of material from the entire foundation
site, mix the sand, fly ash and water in a mixing machine [pug mill or other suitable
equipment] and deposit the mixture back into the excavation in layers for spreading to a
specified depth, compacting it in place and grading it in anticipation of subsequent layers.
The total depth of materials placed this way is 10 feet.  The approximate dimensions of the
excavation are 230' by 350'.

As this approach was discussed and evaluated, it appeared that slow production rates and
maintaining quality control would be significant challenges with this method.

An alternative construction concept surfaced  which  employs a highway pulverizer for
mixing, doing the mixing in place rather than outside the excavation, using conditioned ash
delivered by open dump trucks [conditioned ash is warm and contains 4-6 % moisture],
spread with dozers, graded and compacted immediately after placement and preparing for
subsequent layers. Some of the advantages of the approach are faster production rates,
fugitive dust control [ash is already  wet], warm material during potentially cold weather,
                                                                              Page 1 of 5

-------
Case Study
    14
better bonding between layers and fewer pieces of equipment moving in the relatively
confined area at the site.

Construction Operations

The stabilizing project was awarded to James Peterson Sons, Inc of Medford, WI. WK
Construction of Middleton, WI and River View Construction of Wausau, WI were selected
for pulverizing services and on-site grading/trucking assistance respectively.

Work began in October with the excavation of approximately 30,000 CY of granular material
from the foundation site, with walls sloped at 2:1 and grading 2 ramps into the site for
equipment access. The material was stockpiled close to the excavation for easy access as it
was transported back into the building pad area for stabilization. On Monday, 8 Nov 04
contractors constructed a trial  strip to predict production rate, moisture content, hydration
time, optimum blending depth, lag time for compaction and other logistical items.

The stabilizing in the excavation began Tuesday, 9 Nov 04 with the first 8 inch layer.  After
the fly ash was deposited on the sand, it was spread with a GPS equipped dozer, mixed with
the pulverizer and compacted with a smooth drum vibratory roller. It is crucial to apply the
initial compaction immediately behind the pulverizer.  Two passes with the roller was usually
sufficient to achieve the required density.  Upon completion of this process and density was
confirmed,  each layer was covered with the subsequent sand layer, ready for stabilizing.  The
cover material offers  protection for the treated layer, retains moisture to assist in the
hydration process and can easily be treated with additional water to help achieve the proper
composite moisture content for the next layer.  Once the contractor perfected the operation,
the
production  rate increased to 1100 to 1300 square yards [SY] per hour. Equipment consisted
of 2 dozers [one to spread fly ash and one to spread sand], 1 pulverizer, 1 vibratory smooth
drum roller, 1 tractor/water trailer combination, 1 large bucket loader and a fleet of off-road
dump trucks to provide both conditioned fly ash and the subsequent sand layers.

The geotechnical firm providing compliance testing is STS Consultants from the local
Schofield office.  Monitoring the performance with the Black & Veatch team, STS  confirmed
that 95-105 % of Proctor density was typically achieved in 1 1A hours or less.  Initially, tests
for both moisture and density were performed every 15-20 minutes to assure that the
performance requirements were met. Moisture content of the mixture is critical.

It became clear that weather, moisture content, fly ash concentration, mixing rate / depth and
lag time to final compaction were all key, interrelated elements to performance.  Each
element needed to be watched carefully as the process went forward. Cool temperatures, rain
and wind needed to be monitored regularly. One  engineer noted that the light rain that fell
occasionally during the course of the work actually enhanced the operation.

As the project advanced, production continued to improve, specification compliance became
easier to achieve, and both engineers and contractors became more comfortable with the
process.  It was estimated that the entire stabilizing component of this project would be
complete in approximately 15 working days. It was also estimated that upwards of 15,000
tons of fly ash would be required, most provided by WPS  from both the Weston and Pulliam
                                                                                                   Page 2 of 5

-------
Case Study
    14
[Green Bay] plants, but some additional material was required from Alliant Energy from the
Columbia plant near Portage.

Interim Evaluation

At approximately 75% completion of the stabilizing, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources [DNR] evaluated the process, the interim results, the progress, specification
compliance, and the environmental efficacy of this unique application for FAS. The results
of the discussion and field observations were outstanding. Strengths of up  to 600 psi were
commonly achieved, and production rates were excellent. While observing the process in the
excavation, it was clear that the use of conditioned [pre-wetted] fly ash was significantly
better than other spreading methods commonly used. Even spreading the newly placed fly
ash with a dozer produced absolutely no fugitive dust.  Clearly the DNR representative found
the dust free procedure to be very attractive from an environmental point of view.

Post Construction Evaluation

The stabilizing of the new plant foundation was completed November 29, 2004.
Construction of the footings began later that week.  Equipment, forming materials, cover
blankets and other supplies were assembled on the site and the work began. During the
transition period, several key engineers, managers and  contractors were interviewed to assess
the efficacy of this technique.

Washington Group International, Inc is providing construction management of the Weston 4
project. W.T. 'Bill' Scarlata, the WGI civil construction  manager, who had not experienced
constructing a FAS foundation in the past seemed very pleased with the process and the
results. He indicated that there were very few problems with either the application or the
techniques.

Only a few small areas needed to be re-stabilized, but he  pointed out that in those areas
performance changed, likely due to a change in the fly  ash source.

Constructing a FAS sand foundation was a first experience for James Peterson Sons, Inc. as
well.  Unknown production rates, coordination of materials deliveries and sources, hydration
times, compliance testing and performance created some  apprehension for them prior to
commencing the work.  The apprehensions disappeared as the operations went into high gear.
During a post-completion discussion with David Funk, James Peterson Sons superintendent,
he eagerly shared his views of the process. He indicated  it was his first experience
stabilizing soils with fly ash. He found that using cement in a similar application did not
work, so he was pleasantly surprised with the performance of the fly ash. Funk said, "It was
easier than I thought it would be.  It went very smoothly,  but paying strict attention to details
such as water content, mixing times and zero lag time to initial compaction was crucial."
Funk quickly learned that the process did vary some with fly ash sources and attendant
quality, but close observation of materials and close coordination with the soil test engineers
assured contract compliance. He offered that another advantage of this technique is that the
conditioned fly ash comes to the site in the temperature range of 95 to 100  degrees F.  In
November in Wisconsin, that's a real plus.  Asked if he would undertake another large project
like this, he responded:  "You bet!"
                                                                                                  PageS of 5

-------
Case Study
    14
Environmental and Safety Evaluation

Early in the planning for this project, the alternative methods of delivering and spreading the
fly ash were explored and evaluated. Extracting warm, moist conditioned fly ash directly
from the plant silos, transporting it directly to the work site for spreading and mixing found
favor among the planners. It was perceived to be better than the more typical delivery
method, which employs spreading cool, dry fly ash with a controlled hopper truck and adding
moisture during the mixing process.  The preferred alternative proved itself throughout the
project. There was virtually no fugitive dust on the stabilization site.

This was of particular importance to Ron Demulling, safety engineer for James Peterson
Sons. Demulling is responsible for monitoring employee safety on project sites.  He was
very pleased with the absence of dust.  Other employee safety benefits of note are that other
than occasional soils test technicians, the only employees in the work area were equipment
operators. No manual material handling is required and with the GPS controlled dozers, no
staking to control grades is needed.  Fly ash and sand were spread to proper depth by the
dozers.

Conclusions

Constructing a strong, massive FAS foundation by mixing native soils [sand in this case],
conditioned class 'C' fly ash in a closely controlled work environment with appropriate
design requirements, equipment and performance monitoring is a very new, but extremely
effective technique.  Black and Veatch engineers have designed the foundation for another
component of the new plant using the same technique. That might require upwards of 1,000
tons of fly ash. Contractors indicated that they find the method so  smooth they would
definitely  use it again.

The technique is environmentally superior to others, considering employee safety, ambient
air quality, and impact on contiguous landmass. Furthermore, engineers anticipate that over
time, the FAS  material will continue to gain strength, significantly exceeding the 600 psi
recorded during compliance testing. It has clear advantages [inherent heat and moisture
content] for heavy construction during early winter in cold climates like northern Wisconsin;
it is not adversely affected by seasonal rains; in embankment construction, there are no
delays between construction of multiple layers and it is cost effective. On this project, FAS
versus pile construction saved approximately  35% of estimated cost and several weeks of
construction time.

As the engineering and contracting communities become more familiar with the advantages
of FAS foundation construction, it has  the potential to increase in popularity. And the use of
conditioned ash, delivered and spread with open dump trucks, especially on large, closely
controlled projects will gain in popularity.

For more information on this project, contact Mr. Gerard W. Skrzypchak at [715] 355-2010;
gskrzyp@wpsr.com or James R. Rosenmerkel, P.E. at [262]547-2585;
jbrosie@sbcglobal.net.
                                                                                                  Page 4 of 5

-------
Case Study
     14
Disclaimer

The engineering, concepts, reports by various project personnel and conclusions are those of the reporter,
James R. Rosenmerkel, P.E., consultant to Lafarge North America. They do not necessarily represent the views
or policies of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation or its project affiliates.

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of WPS Resources Corporation (NYSE:
WPS), is an investor-owned electric and natural gas utility headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin. It serves
approximately 415,000 electric customers and 300,000 retail natural gas customers in residential, agricultural,
industrial, and commercial markets, as well as wholesale customers.  The company's service area includes
northeastern and central Wisconsin, as well as an adjacent portion of Upper Michigan.
                     Submitted By:
                     James R. Rosenmerkel, P.E.
                   COAL COMBUSTION
                   PRODUCTS PARTNERSHIP
                       This coal ash utilization case study is a selection of the Coal Combustion Product Partner ship. For
                       more information, consult the C2P2 web site at http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/osw/conserve/c2p2/

                                                                                               Page 5 of 5

-------