United States Solid Waste and EPA 500-F-99-289
Environmental Protection Emergency Response October 1999
Agency (5101) www.epa.gov/brownfields/
Washington, DC 20460
Brownfields Economic
Redevelopment Initiative
Proposal Guidelines
for Supplemental Assistance for
Brownfields Assessment Demonstration
Pilots
-------
EPA's Brownfields Program
Supplemental Assistance for Assessment
Demonstration Pilots - FY2000
Introduction
As a part of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative,
the Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots are designed to empower States, communities, tribes, and
other stakeholders in economic redevelopment to work together in a timely manner to prevent, assess, safely
cleanup, and promote the sustainable reuse of brownfields. EPA has awarded cooperative agreements to
States, cities, towns, counties, and Tribes for demonstration pilots that test brownfields assessment models,
direct special efforts toward removing regulatory barriers without sacrificing protectiveness, and facilitate
coordinated public and private efforts at the Federal, State, tribal and local levels. To date, the Agency has
funded 307 Brownfields Assessment Pilots.
The 227 assessment pilot communities that have received EPA funding on or before
September 30,1998, may apply for supplemental funding during FY 2000. Pilots funded after that
date will be eligible to apply for supplemental funding during FY2001, dependent upon
appropriation of those funds.
The deadline for proposals for the supplemental assessment pilot funding is December 22,1999.
Proposals must be post-marked or sent to EPA via registered or tracked mail by the stated deadline.
EPA's Brownfields Initiative
EPA defines brownfields as abandoned, idled, or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where
expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. EPA's
Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is an organized commitment to help communities revitalize
such properties both environmentally and economically, mitigate potential health risks, and restore economic
vitality to areas where brownfields exist. Experience gained from the brownfields assessment pilots, along
with partnerships and outreach activities, is providing a growing knowledge base to help direct EPA's
Brownfields Initiative. Successful brownfields redevelopment is proof that economic development and the
environment can, and indeed, must co-exist.
EPA's efforts under the Brownfields Initiative can be grouped into four broad and overlapping categories:
! Providing grants for brownfields pilot projects;
-------
! Clarifying liability and cleanup issues;
! Building partnerships and outreach among federal agencies, states, tribes, municipalities, communities, and
other entities; and
! Fostering local job development and training initiatives.
The brownfields assessment pilots are a key component of the program, bringing together community groups,
investors, lenders, developers, and other affected parties to address the issue of cleaning up sites
contaminated with hazardous substances and preparing them for appropriate, productive use. The pilots
serve as vehicles to explore a series of models for states and localities struggling with such efforts.
In fiscal year 2000 (FYOO), EPA has determined that assessment pilots awarded on or before September 30,
1998, may apply for up to $150,000 for continuance and expansion of their brownfields assessment efforts.
This supplemental funding will be awarded on a competitive basis.
An additional $50,000 may be awarded to an applicant to carry out assessment activities at a brownfields
site(s) that is or will be used for greenspace purposes. Greenspace purposes may include, but are not limited
to, parks, playgrounds, trails, gardens, habitat restoration, open space, and/or greenspace preservation. This
$50,000 is available in addition to the $150,000 that is available to continue and expand on existing pilot
efforts. Please refer to Part II of the Evaluation Criteria section. Note that use of the additional $50,000
must be in accordance with the authorities and guidelines described below.
These pilots focus on EPA's primary mission—protecting human health and the environment. However, it is
an essential piece of the nation's overall community revitalization efforts. EPA works closely with other
federal agencies through the Interagency Working Group on Brownfields and builds relationships with other
stakeholders on the national, tribal, and local levels to develop coordinated approaches for community
revitalization.
-------
Guidelines for the Preparation of
Proposals
Supplemental funding for the brownfields assessment pilots is authorized under Section 104(d)(l) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, (CERCLA
or Superfund), 42 U.S.C. 9604(d)(l). States (including U.S. Territories), political subdivisions (including
cities, towns, counties), and Federally recognized Indian Tribes which received a brownfields assessment pilot
grant on or before September 30, 1998, are eligible to apply.
Through a brownfields cooperative agreement, EPA authorizes an eligible state, political subdivision, or Indian
Tribe to undertake activities authorized under CERCLA section 104. Use of these supplemental assistance
pilot funds must be in accordance with CERCLA, and all CERCLA restrictions on use of funds also apply to
the assessment pilots. Brownfields demonstration pilot proposals for supplemental funding (including
greenspace funding) should conform to the following guidelines:
! Pilot activities must be directed toward environmental response activities preliminary to cleanup, such as
site assessment, site identification, site characterization, and site response or cleanup planning and design.
"Site identification" in this case means the identification of sites at which such contamination may be an
issue of concern. These activities can encompass administration, public/community involvement, or field
work associated with site assessment, site identification, site characterization, and site remediation planning
and design.
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may be used to assess, identify, characterize, and plan cleanup
activities at contaminated sites targeted for reuse, redevelopment, and greenspace use. These funds may
not be used to pay for development activities that are not CERCLA response activities (e.g.., construction
of a new facility, purchase of property).
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may be used for planning and/or studies regarding legal, fiscal,
economic and other issues, so long as such plans and studies are necessary and appropriate to planning
and directing an assessment or cleanup action.
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may only be used at sites where there is release, or substantial threat of
release, of a CERCLA hazardous substance, or there is a release, or substantial threat of release of a
pollutant or contaminant which may present an imminent and substantial danger to the public health or
welfare. In addition, funds may be used at sites where there is a reason to believe that a release has
occurred or is about to occur (e.g. based on past historical uses).
-------
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may not be used for activities at any sites listed or proposed to be
listed on CERCLA's National Priorities List, base realignment and closure (BRAC) sites, or any areas
undergoing cleanup under RCRA corrective action authorities. If there are any other federal or state
enforcement actions in place at a site proposed to be included in this pilot project, please describe (in the
Implementation Planning section) the enforcement action, its environmental response requirements, and
how the brownfields project will supplement the environmental work required.
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may not be used for actual cleanup or other response activities
associated with such cleanups (e.g., landscaping and ground-water extraction and treatment). Site
cleanups should be carried out through other means, such as state voluntary cleanup programs, state
government grants, state tax incentive programs, tribal funds, contributions from responsible parties,
developers, or a loan from a federally funded revolving loan fund.
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may be used for public/community involvement activities to explain site
selection, assessment, characterization, or cleanup planning activities at a site or set of sites. These
activities should be directed toward obtaining more effective public involvement in decisions regarding
environmental assessment and cleanup at such sites. These funds may not be used for general education
activities (e.g., grants to schools for development of curriculum).
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may not be used for job training of community members. Support for
job training activities may be available through the Hazardous Material Training and Research Institute,
EPA programs, other federal agency programs, and state, local, and tribal programs. However, specific
training related to tasks to be conducted by the applicant under the grant are allowable (e.g., database
training of grant personnel to create a site inventory would be allowable).
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may not be used to support "lobbying" efforts of the grantee (e.g.,
lobbying members of Congress, or lobbying for other federal grants, cooperative agreements, or
contracts). Federal grant funds may not be used for fund-raising purposes.
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may not be used for assessment, identification, characterization, or
cleanup planning at sites contaminated by petroleum products, unless they are believed to be co-mingled
with a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant (e.g., used oil).
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may not be used to address, identify, characterize, or plan for the
cleanup of products that are part of the structure of and result in exposure within residential buildings or
business or community structures (e.g., interior lead-based paint or asbestos which results in indoor
exposure).
! Brownfields assessment pilot funds may not be used to match any other federal funds without specific
statutory authority.
-------
Evaluation of the Proposals
The Brownfields Supplemental Assistance for Assessment Pilots are administered on a competitive basis. To
ensure a fair selection process, EPA Regional and Headquarters staff will evaluate the proposals. The
evaluators will assess how well the proposals meet the selection criteria outlined below.
Proposals must be clear and concise, strictly follow the criteria, and provide sufficient detail for the panels to
compare the merits of each and decide which proposal best supports the intent of the pilot program. Vague
descriptions and unnecessary redundancy may reduce the chance of a favorable rating. Proposals providing
the best evidence of a true need, a quality project, appropriate use of funds and demonstrated success under
the original brownfields pilot project will have the best chance of being recommended by the panels.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact and, if possible, meet with EPA Regional Brownfields
Coordinators prior to submission of the proposal (see contact list on page 15).
The evaluators will review the proposal for Brownfields Supplemental Assistance and for the additional
greenspace funding. The evaluators will make recommendations to EPA Senior Management for final
selection. Note that an applicant may be selected to receive Brownfields Supplemental Assistance of up to
$150,000 even if the applicant is not selected to receive the additional $50,000 for greenspace.
If a proposal is selected, applicants will receive a confirmation letter, and the appropriate EPA Regional
Brownfields Coordinator and Regional Grants Specialist will be informed. The applicant will then be asked to
submit a formal cooperative agreement amendment or application package. This package will include a
formal work plan that describes the work to be performed, a final budget, deliverables (i.e., quarterly
progress reports, etc.), and the required certification forms. If work done under this cooperative agreement
includes environmental sampling, a Quality Assurance Project Plan must be submitted and approved by EPA
prior to performing the sampling work. The work plan submitted as part of the proposal will be the basis for
the formal work plan submittal and should substantially reflect the work to be performed. The EPA Regional
Brownfields Coordinator and Regional Grants Specialist will work closely with the successful applicant to
process and finalize the cooperative agreement amendment or cooperative agreement package.
Applicants with proposals that are not selected will be informed in writing. These applicants may choose to
revise the proposal for submittal by a future deadline announced by EPA at a later date.
-------
Structure of the Proposal
Proposals for brownfields pilot projects should consist of the following sections:
! Cover page /project summary
! Responses to Evaluation Criteria
Parti, #1-3 (required)
Part I, #4 (required)
Part H (optional)
! Attachments
[1 page]
[up to 3 pages]
[3-5 pages suggested]
[2 pages]
[provide a list;
see below for acceptable items]
Attachments should be kept to a minimum. Attachments that will be considered during proposal evaluation are
commitment, support, or partnership from other government or private entities and maps of the project area.
Examples of attachments that will not be considered during proposal evaluation include reports, strategies or
plans developed for other programs, advertising brochures, newspaper articles, statutes, and videotapes.
Information in these types of attachments should be distilled and incorporated into the responses to criteria.
To ensure fair and equitable evaluation of the proposals, please do not exceed the above, single-sided page
limitations. There is no guarantee that pages submitted beyond the limitations will be reviewed by the
evaluation panels and doing so could reduce your chances of a favorable rating. In addition, all materials
included in the proposal (including attachments) must be printed on letter-sized paper (S1/^" by 11") and font
sizes may be no smaller than 11 points. Please submit two copies of your proposal materials, including
attachments, to EPA headquarters. In addition, please submit one copy of your proposal including
attachments, to your EPA Regional Brownfields Coordinator (see list on page 15).
Cover Page/Project Summary
The cover page is intended to identify the brownfields pilot applicant and a point of contact for communication
with EPA. This should be on a single page and include basic information such as:
S Project title
S Project contact, phone, email address and fax.
S Date submitted (when the proposal is postmarked or sent to EPA via registered or tracked mail).
S Project period (the project period must not exceed two years).
S Project summary.
-------
Evaluation Criteria - Part I (Required)
Your response to each of the following criteria will be the primary basis on which EPA selects or rejects your
proposal for supplemental assistance. The proposal evaluation panels will review the proposals carefully and
assess each response based on how well it addresses each criterion. If a particular criteria is not relevant to
your proposal, please acknowledge and explain why it does not apply.
1. Established Brownfields Program
(4 points out of 20 )
The purpose of this section is to show commitment and accomplishments from the city, county, and/or
state to the cooperative agreement recipient's Brownfields Program. This section should describe how
the overall governing body where the Brownfields program is housed has committed to the overall
success of the program.
\ Describe the Brownfields program in your community (e.g. State, city, Council of Government,
County, etc.) including overall program strategy, local Brownfields policy development, lead office for
brownfields work, other offices that are involved in the Brownfields process, designated staff, roles of
the various governmental departments, and funding sources.
! Provide examples of commitments that the local governing agency has made to continuing a successful
brownfields program. This may include a description of staff or offices dedicated specifically to the
Brownfields program and/or additional funding to supplement original EPA grant funds. Describe
what your Brownfields program has done to streamline governmental processes to promote
redevelopment of brownfields sites.
! Discuss any success and accomplishments that were funded outside of the Brownfields Demonstration
Pilot funding. For instance, has your community funded community involvement and/or environmental
justice activities, Phase I/ Phase D7 Phase HI site assessment work, environmental cleanup, or
redevelopment with its own money or sought assistance from other sources (i.e. the state, other
Federal agencies, private entities, or non-profit organizations?)
-------
2. Accomplishments under Existing Brownfields Assessment Pilot
(4 points of out 20)
The purpose of this section is to show demonstrated performance under the existing brownfields
assessment pilot. This section should describe progress made toward meeting the original goals of the
brownfields pilot project and specific accomplishments. The focus of this section are activities that
were funded by EPA.
\ Describe brownfields activities that have been completed under the brownfields pilot project that were
funded by EPA. This may include progress made in site inventory, site assessment, cleanup design
and site reuse planning that was done to facilitate cleanup decisions. Describe progress made toward
community involvement and environmental justice commitments that were made under the original pilot
workplan. This may also include an update on state, federal, state, tribal, local government,
community and private partnerships.
! The applicant may also provide quantitative information on specific measures of success for work
funded by EPA. This may include items such as: number of sites identified, number of site assessments
completed, number of sites that have been redeveloped in the project area, and economic indicators
of success (e.g., jobs created, etc.)
3. Demonstrated Ability to Administer Existing Brownfields Assessment
Demonstration Pilot
(4 points out of 20)
Applicants must demonstrate that they have effectively administered their existing Brownfields
Assessment Demonstration Pilot to be selected for supplemental funding. Each applicant will be
evaluated on: 1) their adherence to the executed cooperative agreement and subsequent amendments,
including the timeliness and accuracy ofdeliverables and reporting requirements, 2) adherence with
the agreed upon schedule for project activities, and 3) the use of the previously provided assessment
pilot funds.
\ Describe your performance with respect to meeting the administrative requirements of your existing
brownfields assessment demonstration pilot cooperative agreement. At a minimum, please describe:
a) whether the required deliverables (including quarterly progress reports, quality assurance plans,
financial status reports, final project reports, or other applicable deliverables) have been submitted to
EPA.
-------
b) whether the assessment pilot proceeded as agreed upon in the cooperative agreement schedule. If
not, please provide an explanation for the delays and their impacts on the pilot project, and
c) the budget status including how much of the pilot funding as been spent, a summary of how the
money has been spent, and how the remaining funds will be spent.
4. Work to be Performed
(8 Points out of 20)
This section will describe the work to be performed using the Supplemental Assistance funds. If this
proposal is selected for funding, you will be asked to adapt andresubmit this section as a cooperative
workplan or amendment. Therefore, pilots should make every effort to utilize the structure in their
original cooperative agreement workplan.
\ Introduction - Provide a general discussion of the project and new site(s) in the project area and the
problems and needs associated with redevelopment. Explain the goals and objectives of the
supplemental project. Discuss flow of ownership of each identified site.
! Management and Coordination - Identify the management structure responsible for coordinating the
execution of the tasks that comprise the pilot program. Identify the project coordinator and all the
other specific position titles such as environmental consultants, interns, and others that will charge time
to the pilot. Identify project partners (e.g., state, other federal agencies.) Any anticipated changes to
the current management structure should be clearly identified.
In addition to the tasks identified, the pilot recipient will continue to be responsible for preparing
quarterly reports on the progress of the work plan and a final summary report.
! Tasks and Schedule - Describe tasks that will be performed, a schedule of planned activities and a list
of deliverables that will be submitted to EPA upon completion of each task. This could include tasks
such as: site identification and inventory, site assessment and planning, identification of cleanup
options, and community outreach/public involvement. Where several tasks are identified, a chart
showing activity, schedule, and deliverables should be included. In the box below is an example of a
suggested format for this chart. When environmental sampling is identified as a task, a site-specific
sampling plan must be developed, along with a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), and a site-
specific health and safety plan. NOTE: Tasks for which an applicant is seeking the additional $50,000
for greenspace should be included in the response to Part n.
EXAMPLE
-------
Task 3: Phase II Environmental Assessment at 3 Properties
Narrative
Activities Deliverables Submittal Date to EPA
ASTM Phase II Field Sampling Plan mm/dd/yy
Q A Proj ect PI an mm/dd/yy
Health & Safety Plan mm/dd/yy
3 Phase II reports mm/dd/yy
! Budget - Provide a detailed budget of anticipated expenditures of US EPA cooperative agreement
dollars according to task. The budget should show the distribution of the demonstration pilot funds,
including cost estimates for each of the proposed pilot activities. A clear and concise budget is a
critical element of the package. If you are applying for the additional $50,000 for greenspace, please
provide a separate budget for the $50,000 in your response to Part n.
A significant portion of the budget should be for site-specific activities (e.g., site assessment
and cleanup planning), while administrative costs should be kept to a minimum. In cases where
site-specific activities are not planned, the applicant must clearly explain why this project does not
incorporate site-specific activities and provide a detailed project plan and budget for the other planned
tasks. Although these are estimated costs, the logic that was used to estimate these costs must be
included in the budget write-up.
10
-------
The following is a suggested format for your budget:
Budget
Categories
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Travel
Equipment
Supplies
Contractual
Other
Total
Project Tasks
Taskl
Task 2
Task3
Task 4
Total
Measures of Success - List specific benchmarks that will be used to measure progress and success
within the two year project period. Typical Measures of Success can include:
• Number of properties with brownfields assessments started;
• Number of properties with brownfields assessments completed with pilot funding;
• Number of properties with brownfields assessments completed with other funding;
• Number of properties with brownfields assessments that do not require cleanup;
• Number of properties with brownfields redevelopment activities underway;
• Number of cleanup/construction jobs leveraged;
• Number of cleanup dollars leveraged;
• Number of redevelopment jobs leveraged;
• Number of redevelopment/construction dollars leveraged;
• Number of properties with brownfields cleanup activities started;
• Number of properties with brownfields cleanup activities completed.
11
-------
Evaluation Criteria (Part II ~ Optional)
5. Greenspace
(8 points)
Those proposals selected to receive $150,000 may also be selected to receive $50,000. An additional
$50,000 may be awarded to an applicant to carry out assessment activities for a brownfields site(s)
that is or will be used for greenspace purposes. Greenspace purposes include, but are not limited to,
parks, playgrounds, trails, gardens, habitat restoration, open space, and/or greenspace preservation.
This $50,000 is available in addition to the $150,000 that is available to continue and expand on
existing pilot efforts.
As with all other Assessment Demonstration Pilot funds, the greenspace funding may be used for
assessment activities, such as site investigation, site characterization, planning for reuse, so as to
facilitate cleanup decisions, other cleanup planning activities, and community involvement related to
the site. Use of the greenspace funds must be in accordance with CERCLA, and all CERCLA
restrictions and assessment program guidelines also apply to greenspace funds.
This is an optional portion of the assessment pilot proposal. All proposals will be reviewed, scored,
and ranked based on a total of 20 points for Part I, Evaluation Criteria #1-4. The projects that are
selected that include a request for greenspace funding will be further evaluated based on the points
obtained in Part II, Evaluation Criteria #5. Based on this evaluation, some, but not all, greenspace
proposals are likely to be funded.
An applicant may still be selected to receive a Brownfields Supplemental Assistance Assessment
Demonstration pilot grant of up to $150,000 even if the applicant is not selected to receive the
additional $50,000 for greenspace.
Authority and Context (2 points out of 8)
! Describe the local agency(ies) responsible for greenspace and explain the partnership with the pilot
lead office. Attach letters of support documenting partnership.
! Describe existing open space/greenspace plans, activities, and resource needs with respect to
brownfields redevelopment in your community. Explain if this site is near, on, or adjacent to any
brownfields sites described in Part I of your proposal or to the sites in your initial brownfields pilot
project funded by EPA. Describe public and private commitment to this greenspace project.
Describe the potential impact on the surrounding community.
12
-------
Community Involvement (2 points out of 8)
! Describe community involvement efforts planned or underway near the site(s). Describe
environmental justice considerations, measures to involve environmental justice populations, and
anticipated benefits to low income and/or people of color communities disproportionately burdened by
environmental pollution. Describe how affected communities were involved in the selection of the
site(s), and how they will be involved in future land use decisions.
Site Identification, Site Assessment Plan, Flow of Ownership, and Reuse Planning
(4 points out of 8)
! Describe the site selection process. Identify the site(s) you plan to assess.
! Describe the site assessment activities that will be conducted on your site(s). If your project involves
more than one site, describe the activities for each site and the number of sites undergoing the various
phases of site assessment. Identify additional potential site assessment funding sources.
i
Describe site control, acquisition, and flow of ownership.
! Describe the proposed end use of the site(s) being assessed and the anticipated benefits to the
community. Provide a brief summary of any feasibility studies, if available.
! Describe potential funding sources and public/private partners that will be involved in the cleanup,
redevelopment, and maintenance of the site.
! Describe work to be performed, a schedule of planned activities and a list of deliverables that will be
submitted to EPA upon completion of each task. Where several tasks are identified, a chart showing
activity, schedule, and deliverables should be included. Please refer to page 10 for an example of a
suggested format for this chart. When environmental sampling is identified as a task, a site-specific
sampling plan must be developed, along with a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and a site
specific health and safety plan.
13
-------
Schedule for Selecting Supplemental
Assistance for Brownfields Assessment Pilots
The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response will accept proposals postmarked or sent to EPA via
registered or tracked mail by December 22, 1999. A detailed activity timeline corresponding to the proposal
deadline is outlined below. For assistance with your brownfields assessment pilot proposal, please call
your Regional Brownfields Coordinator (see list on page 15).
Activity Timeline for Supplemental Assistance Proposals
December 22, 1999 Deadline for proposals for EPA 2000 supplemental assessment awards.
January 2000 Evaluation of proposals.
March 2000 Announcement of EPA 2000 awards.
Two copies of each proposal must be post-marked or sent to EPA via registered or tracked mail by
December 22, 1999 to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OSWER Outreach and Special Projects Staff (5101)
401 M Street, SW
Room SE 385
Washington, DC 20460
An additional copy must be sent to the EPA Regional Coordinator listed on the next page.
14
-------
EPA Regional Brownfields Contacts
If you have questions regarding the proposal guidelines, you may call your Regional representative presented
below:
Regions and States
EPA Region 1
John Podgurski
podgurski.john@epa.gov
EPA Region 2
Larry D' Andrea
dandrea.larry@epa.gov
EPA Region 3
Tom Stolle
stolle.tom@epa.gov
EPA Region 4
Mickey Hartnett
hartnett.mickey@epa.gov
EPA Region 5
Brooke Furio
furio.brooke@epa.gov
EPA Region 6
Monica Smith
smith.monica@epa.gov
EPA Region 7
Susan Klein
klein.susan@epa.gov
EPA Region 8
Kathie Atencio
atencio.kathie@epa.gov
EPA Region 9
Jim Hanson
hanson.jim@epa.sov
EPA Region 10
Susan Morales
morales.susan@epa.gov
EPA Headquarters
Becky Brooks
brooks.becky@epa.gov
CT, ME, MA,
NH, HI, VT
N J, NY, PR, VI
DE, DC, MD,
PA, VA, WV
AL, FL, GA,
KY, MS, NC,
SC, TN
IL, IN, MI,
MN, OH, WI
AR, LA, NM,
OK, TX
IA, KS, MO,
NE
CO, MT, ND,
SD, UT, WY
AZ, CA, HI,
NV, AS, GU
AK, ID, OR,
WA
Address and Phone Number
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (Mailcode HIO)
Boston, MA 02114-2023
Phone (617) 918-1209 Fax (617) 918-1291
290 Broadway
18th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Phone (212) 637-4314 Fax (212) 637-4360
1650 Arch Street (3HS34)
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Phone (215) 814-3129 Fax (215) 814-5518
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
Phone (404) 562-8661 Fax (404) 562-8628
77 West Jackson Boulevard (SE-4J)
Chicago, IL 60604-3507
Phone (312) 353-2513 Fax (312) 886-7190
First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain PI.
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
Phone (214) 665-6736 Fax (214) 665-6660
901 N. 5th Street
Kansas City, KS 66101
Phone (913) 551-7786 Fax (913) 551-8688
999 18th Street, Suite 500 (EPR)
Denver, CO 80202-2466
Phone (303) 312-6803 Fax (303) 312-6067
75 Hawthorne Street, SFD 1-1
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone (415) 744-2237 Fax (415) 744- 1796
1200 Sixth Avenue (ECL-115)
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone (206) 553-7299 Fax (206) 553-0124
401 M Street, SW (5101)
Washington, D.C. 20460
Phone (202) 260-8474 Fax (202) 260-6606
15
-------
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(5101)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
EPA 500-F-99-289
October 1999
------- |