&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
The Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation
Program
ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS
FY 2004
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE
TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION
-------
Notice
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and
Development, partially funded and collaborated in the research described here under our contract
No. 68-C-00-186 to Environmental Quality Management, Inc. It has been subjected to the
Agency's peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA
document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
11
-------
Foreword
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by Congress with
protecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national
environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a
compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural systems to support and
nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's research program is providing data and technical
support for solving environmental problems today and building a science knowledge base
necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our
health, and prevent or reduce environmental risks in the future.
The National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) is the Agency's center
for investigation of technological and management approaches for preventing and reducing risks
from pollution that threaten human health and the environment. The focus of the Laboratory's
research program is on methods and their cost-effectiveness for prevention and control of
pollution to air, land, water, and subsurface resources; protection of water quality in public water
systems; remediation of contaminated sites, sediments and ground water; prevention and control
of indoor air pollution; and restoration of ecosystems. NRMRL collaborates with both public
and private sector partners to foster technologies that reduce the cost of compliance and to
anticipate emerging problems. NRMRL's research provides solutions to environmental problems
by: developing and promoting technologies that protect and improve the environment; advancing
scientific and engineering information to support regulatory and policy decisions; and providing
the technical support and information transfer to ensure implementation of environmental
regulations and strategies at the national, state, and community levels.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-term
research plan. It is published and made available by EPA's Office of Research and Development
to assist the user community and to link researchers with their clients.
Sally Gutierrez, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
in
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
IV
-------
Contents
Section
Notice ii
Foreword iii
Figures and Tables vi
Acronyms vii
Executive Summary viii
SITE Program Description and FY04 Accomplishments 1
Background 1
Completed Demonstration in FY04 2
Active and Semi-Passive Lime Treatment 3
Compost-Free Biological Treatment of Acid Rock Drainage 3
Base Catalyzed Decomposition Process 4
Detailed Description of Monitoring & Measurement Technology Activities in F Y04 5
Ongoing Demonstration 5
Future Activity 5
Appendices
A - Detailed SITE Program Description and Process
B - SITE Projects (Alphabetically by Developer State)
C - SITE Technology Demonstration Sites (Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
D - Electronic Technical Information Resources
E - Glossary of Remediation Technologies
-------
Figures
Number Page
1 SITE Program Process Flow 1
Tables
Number Page
1 SITE Projects Completed in FY 04 2
2 SITE Ongoing Projects in FY 04 6
VI
-------
Acronyms
ANSI/ASQC
DNAPL
DOD
DOE
ECOS
EPA
ESTCP
ETV
FY
GPR
IDC
ITRC
MHI
MMT
NELP
NPL
NRC
ORD
PAHs
PCBs
REACHIT
RCI
SITE
TIP
TPH
VOC
American National Standard Institute, Assistance for Environmental Data
Collection and Environmental Technology Programs
Dense non-aqueous phase liquids
Department of Defense
Department of Energy
Environmental Council of States
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Security and Technology Certification Program
Environmental Technologies Verification
Fiscal year
Ground penetrating radar
Interagency DNAPL Consortium
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Monitoring and Measurement Technologies
Navy Environmental Leadership Program
National Priorities List
National Research Council
Office of Research and Development
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Remediation Characterization Innovative Technologies
White House Rapid Commercialization Initiative
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Innovation Program
Total petroleum hydrocarbon
Volatile Organic Compound
vn
-------
Executive Summary
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program has successfully
promoted the development, commercialization, and implementation of innovative hazardous
waste treatment technologies for 18 years. SITE offers a mechanism for conducting joint
technology demonstration and evaluation projects at hazardous waste sites involving the private
sector, EPA, and other federal and state agencies. The program provides environmental decision-
makers with relevant data on new, viable remediation technologies that may have performance or
cost advantages compared to conventional treatment technologies.
The SITE Program focuses on the remediation needs of the hazardous waste remediation
community through program planning; matching priority sites with innovative cleanup solutions;
technology field demonstrations; and information dissemination. The report summarizes the
progress and findings of the SITE Program in FY 2004. The report is prepared in accordance
with the statutory requirements of CERCLA (42 USC 9660).
Vlll
-------
SITE Program Description and FY04 Accomplishments
Background
The SITE Program is composed of a
Demonstration Program, a Monitoring and
Measurement Technology (MMT) Program,
and information transfer. SITE offers a
mechanism for conducting joint technology
demonstration and evaluation projects at
hazardous waste sites through the
involvement of the private sector, EPA, and
other federal and state agencies. Appendix
A presents a further description of program
principles, implementation, and historical
results.
SITE's Demonstration Program
evaluates and verifies innovative
technologies at selected hazardous waste
sites to provide reliable performance, costs,
and applicability information for site
cleanup decision-making. The MMT
Program evaluates technologies that detect,
monitor, and measure hazardous and toxic
substances to provide more cost-effective
and accurate methods for producing real-
time data during site characterization and
remediation.
The MMT Program has leveraged its
resources with EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification Program and other
Federal Agencies to meet the needs of the
Unproven, High-potential
Technology
SITE
PROGRAM
DEMONSTRATION
- Objectivity
- Proven Technical Expertise
- QA/QC
- Scientifically Designed
Evaluation
Program and reduce the backlog of
applications submitted by developers of
innovative technologies in a cost-effective
and timely manner.
To further advance the MMT
Program, a technical advisory group was
formed to assist demonstration design,
outreach activities, and the selection of
technologies. This group of technology
advocates includes representation from the
EPA Regional offices and acts to ensure that
the products of the demonstrations address
issues relevant to EPA. Recent focus has
been placed on the need for in-situ
remediation technologies to more cost-
effectively remediate sites.
The SITE Program's information
transfer activities disseminate technical
information, including engineering,
performance, and cost data, to assist in
removing barriers for use of innovative and
alternative technologies.
Figure 1 presents the basic elements
of the SITE Program process flow from
unproven technologies to commercial
success.
RESULTS
- Solid Cost Analysis
- Credible Performance data
Commercial Success
Redesigned/Configured
Technology - Additional
Evaluation or Abandonment
Figure 1. SITE Program Process Flow
1
-------
Completed Demonstrations in FY04
In FY 2004, the SITE Program
completed demonstrations of four treatment
technologies. Two demonstrations were
conducted at the same site. The Monitoring
and Measurement Technology Program
completed demonstrations of five
technologies. The completed demonstrations
are presented in Table 1 and a more detailed
description of the demonstrations follow.
Table 1. SITE Projects Completed in FY04
Developer
Location
CA
CA
OH
NV
Developer
ARCO
State of
California and
EPA Region 9
U.S. EPA
University of
Nevada, Reno
Demonstration Treatment Technology
Evaluation of a semi-passive alkaline lagoon, innovative
acid mine drainage (AMD) and acid rock drainage (ARD)
treatment technology.
Evaluation of an innovative active lime AMD and ARD
treatment system operated in biphasic and monophasic
modes.
Treatability study for the evaluation of the Base Catalyzed
Decomposition (BCD) process at the Warren County
Landfill Site, Warrenton, NC. This chemical
dechlorination process will determine the ability of the
BCD process to chemically dechlorinate the PCBs and
dioxin in the soils.
Evaluation of an innovative acid mine drainage (AMD)
treatment technology. Sulfate reducing bacteria in
bioreactors generate H2S gas which reacts with the water
column to precipitate metals and raise the pH of the AMD.
Site Location
Leviathan Mine
Site, CA
Leviathan Mine
Site, CA
Warrenton, NC
Leviathan Mine
Site, CA
Monitoring and Measurement Technology
Developer
Location
DE
ME
NC
NC
VA
Developer
Strategic
Diagnostics
Cape
Technologies
Xenobiotics
Hybrizyme
Wako Chemicals
Dioxin Testing in Soils and Sediments
Immunoassay and Colorimetry
DPI Immunoassay
Cell Based Immunoassay
Immunoassay and Colorimetry
Dioxin Elisa Kit
Site Location
Saginaw, Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan
-------
Active and Semi-Passive Lime Treatment
of Acid Mine Drainage at Leviathan
Mine, California (2 technologies)
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) National Risk Management
Research Laboratory (NRMRL), in
cooperation with EPA Region IX, the State
of California, and the Atlantic Richfield
Company (ARCO), evaluated lime treatment
of acid mine drainage (AMD) and acid rock
drainage (ARD) at the Leviathan Mine
Superfund site located in Alpine County,
California. Two lime treatment systems in
operation at the mine in 2002 and 2003 were
evaluated: an active lime treatment system
operated in biphasic and monophasic modes,
and a semi-passive alkaline lagoon treatment
system.
The initial fixed costs to construct
the lime treatment systems were (1)
$1,021,415 for the active lime treatment
operated in monophasic mode (2)
$1,261,076 for the active lime treatment
system operated in biphasic mode, and (3)
$297,482 for the semi-passive alkaline
lagoon treatment system.
Both treatment systems were shown
to be extremely effective at neutralizing
acidity and reducing the concentrations of
the 10 target metals in the AMD and ARD
flows at Leviathan Mine to below EPA
discharge standards. Although the influent
concentrations for the primary target metals
were up to 3,000 fold above the EPA
discharge standards, both lime treatment
systems were successful in reducing the
concentrations of the primary target metals
in the AMD and ARD to between 4 and 20
fold below EPA discharge standards. In
addition, the active lime treatment system
operated in biphasic mode was shown to be
very effective at separating arsenic from the
AMD prior to precipitation of other metals,
subsequently reducing the total volume of
hazardous solid waste produced by the
treatment system. Separating the arsenic
into a smaller solid waste stream
significantly reduces materials handling and
disposal costs.
Based on the success of lime
treatment at the Leviathan Mine site, the
state of California will continue to treat
AMD at the site using the active lime
treatment system in biphasic mode, and
ARCO will continue to treat ARD using the
semi-passive alkaline lagoon treatment
system.
There are 79 abandoned mine land
sites on the national priority list (NPL),
nearly all of which have significant
AMD/ARD problems similar to the
Leviathan site. These sites are located
primarily in the West, in EPA Regions 8, 9,
and 10. Accordingly, the successful
performance of the active- and semi-passive
lime treatment systems as demonstrated on
the AMD and ARD at the Leviathan site
indicates a high potential for applicability of
these technologies to these other AMD/ARD
sites.
Compost-Free Biological Treatment of
Acid Rock Drainage
Compost-free bioreactor technology
utilizes sulfate-reducing bacteria nurtured to
generate sulfides that scavenge dissolved
metals to form metal sulfide precipitates.
Unlike compost bioreactors, this technology
uses a liquid carbon source and a rock
matrix rather than a compost or wood chip
matrix that is consumed by bacteria and
collapses over time.
The SITE demonstration consisted of
monthly sampling events of the bioreactor
treatment system with periods of extended
inaccessibility due to winter snowfall.
Through the SITE demonstration, EPA
collected chemical data on the system's
influent and effluent streams, documented
-------
metals removal and reduction in acidity
within the system's unit operations, and
recorded operational information pertinent
to the evaluation of the treatment system.
EPA evaluated the treatment system based
on removal efficiencies for primary and
secondary target metals, comparison of
effluent concentrations to interim discharge
standards (pre-risk assessment and record of
decision) mandated by EPA in 2002, and on
the characteristics of resulting metals-
enriched solid wastes. Removal efficiencies
of individual unit operations were also
evaluated.
The compost-free bioreactor
treatment system was shown to be extremely
effective at neutralizing acidity and reducing
the concentrations of the five target and five
secondary metals in the ARD flows at
Leviathan Mine to below EPA-mandated
discharge standards. The solids generated
by this technology were not found to be
hazardous under state or federal standards or
to pose a threat to water quality.
The initial fixed costs to construct
bioreactor treatment system are $836,617 for
the treatment system operated in gravity
flow mode, and $864,119 for the treatment
system operated in recirculation mode.
There are 79 abandoned mine land
sites on the national priority list (NPL),
nearly all of which have significant
AMD/ARD problems similar to the
Leviathan site. These sites are located
primarily in the west, in EPA Regions 8, 9,
and 10. Accordingly, the successful
performance of the compost-free biological
treatment technology as demonstrated on the
AMD and ARD at the Leviathan site
indicates a high potential for applicability of
this technology to these other AMD/ARD
sites.
Base Catalyzed Decomposition Process
The objective of the study was to
evaluate the effectiveness of the BCD
process to chemically dechlorinate the PCB-
and dioxin-contaminated effluent oils
generated by the thermal desorption of PCB-
and dioxin-contaminated soils at the Warren
County Landfill in North Carolina. The
BCD process relies on catalytic
hydrogenation. In this type of process, a
hydrogen donor in the untreated material
supplies hydrogen ions that replace chlorine
atoms in the chlorinated contaminants. The
chlorinated contaminants are reduced to
less-toxic unchlorinated compounds and the
chlorine is displaced as a chloride ion.
Results of the pilot-scale treatability
tests performed on condensate oil indicate
that the BCD dechlorination process
effectively removes PCBs and dioxins
below detection levels of 5 ppm. Full-scale
BCD tests were not possible because there
was not enough condensate oil generated for
the full-scale BCD system to treat. An
economic analysis was not performed
because the technology was evaluated at less
than full-scale.
PCBs are ranked fifth on the
CERCLA priority list of hazardous
substances (prioritization of substances
based on a combination of their frequency,
toxicity, and potential for human exposure at
NPL sites). PCB-, dioxin-, and other
chlorinated compound-contaminated
CERCLA sites are located throughout the
U.S. Chlorinated organics are prevalent in
most Superfund sites, many of which have
significant environmental impact problems
similar to the Warren County landfill site.
Accordingly, the successful performance of
the Base Catalyzed Decomposition Process
as demonstrated on the Warren County site's
PCB/dioxin-contaminated soils and process
condensate oils indicates a high potential for
applicability of these technologies to this
and other similar sites.
-------
Detailed Description of Monitoring &
Measurement Technology Activities in
FY04
The MMT Program completed a
demonstration of technologies to determine
dioxin in soils and sediments. The X-ray
fluorescence (XRF) technology for
measuring inorganic contaminants in soil, or
water matrices, was first tested in 1997, and
was judged to be an ideal candidate for
retesting. The XRF developers made an
appeal to submit their state-of-the-art
technologies to a new evaluation.
Significant improvements in electronics,
design, and data analysis along with a
number of new companies (a total of five)
not in existence at the time of the original
study made this technology an ideal
candidate for the SITE MMT Program. This
project initiated in FY04 and is ongoing.
Ongoing Demonstrations
Table 2 identifies the projects that
are undergoing demonstration in FY04.
There are six on-going treatment technology
demonstrations.
Future Activity
The SITE Program will continue to
emphasize the need for technologies that
focus on types of contaminated sites rather
than single contaminants. Five technology
demonstrations are planned to be initiated in
FY05. These demonstration are listed in
Appendix A.
-------
Table 2. SITE Ongoing Projects in FY 04
Developer
Location
CT
DE
HI
IL
VA
WA
Developer
University of
Connecticut
Remediation
Technology
Development
Forum and
Hazardous
Substance
Research Center,
SW
University of
Hawaii
GTI
Biogenesis
Enterprises, Inc.
PortofRidgefield
Demonstration Treatment Technology
Evaluation of the DUOX (Dual Oxidation) technology for the
remediation of chlorinated organics. The DUOX technology
utilizes two different chemical oxidants (potassium permanganate
and sodium persulfate) injected into the subsurface for the
oxidation of the chlorinated solvent contaminants.
Evaluation of an innovative capping design (Aquablok™) to
reduce the exposure of contaminants in the sediments of the
Anacostia River.
Evaluation of the use of Intermittent Up-Flow Anaerobic
Bioreactor (IUFAB) technology for treatment of PCB-
contaminated oil.
Evaluation of the treatment of PCB-contaminated sediments
including an investigation for the beneficial reuse of the treated
sediments.
Evaluation of a sediment washing process. Dredged sediment is
treated in order to meet applicable criteria for beneficial use of the
sediment.
Evaluation of steam-enhanced remediation, which is an in situ
thermal treatment soil cleanup technology. The technology
involves installation of a steam injection system and an aggressive
vapor and liquid extraction system for the reduction of organic
contaminants.
Site Location
Vemon, CT
Washington, DC.
Pearl Harbor, HI
Bayonne, NJ
Venice, Italy and
New Jersey
Ridgefield, WA
Monitoring and Measurement Technology
Developer
Location
IL
MA
MA
MA
NY
TX
Developer
Oxford
Instruments
Analytical
Innov-X Systems,
Inc.
Niton Corp.
RONTEC USA,
Inc.
XcaliburXRF
Services, Inc.
Rigaku, Inc.
XRF Demonstration
XRF Analyzer Lab-X3500
XRF Analyzer, XT400
XRF Analyzer, XIT700 Series
XRF Analyzer PicoTAX
XRF Analyzer Elvax
XRF Analyzer 25X mini
Site Location
Kennedy Space
Center, FL
Kennedy Space
Center, FL
Kennedy Space
Center, FL
Kennedy Space
Center, FL
Kennedy Space
Center, FL
Kennedy Space
Center, FL
-------
Appendix A
DETAILED SITE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND PROGRESS
A-l
-------
Detailed SITE Program Description and Progress
The Demonstration Program is the
flagship of the SITE Program. Its objective
is to conduct field demonstrations and high-
quality performance verifications of viable
remediation technologies at sites that pose
high risks to human health and/or the
environment, are common throughout a
region or the nation, or where existing
remediation methods are inadequate, unsafe,
or too costly. The SITE Program solicits
applications annually from those responsible
for cleanup operations at hazardous waste
sites. A panel of SITE Program scientists,
engineers, and associated environmental
experts reviews the applications to identify
those technologies that best represent
solutions for the most pressing
environmental problems. The resulting data
and reports are intended for use by decision-
makers in selecting remediation options and
for increasing credibility in innovative
applications.
The Demonstration Program has
participated with 154 remediation
technology vendors. Eight applications for
participation in the Demonstration Program
were received in response to the 2004
solicitation. The program typically receives
10 to 20 applications annually.
The Demonstration Program has
successfully demonstrated 153 technologies,
including 4 during FY 04. SITE'S
Monitoring and Measuring Technologies
(MMT) Program has completed 47 projects
to date, with 1 more ongoing.
Program Principles
The SITE Program is defined by the
following four operating principles:
(1) program planning, (2) matching priority
sites with innovative cleanup solutions,
(3) technology field demonstrations, and
(4) information dissemination.
Program Planning
SITE Program direction and
strategies are evaluated each year based on
input from the user community and other
private- and public-sector stakeholders to
ensure that the program continues to focus
on validating the most sought-after
remediation technologies. As part of the
overall program planning process, the SITE
Program has developed and is implementing
a quality management plan based on
American National Standard Institute
Specifications and Guidelines for Quality
Assistance for Environmental Data
Collection and Environmental Technology
Programs (ANSI/ASQC). The Site Quality
Management Plan will document the EPA
SITE Program quality system and will
encompass the management and technical
activities necessary to plan, implement, and
assess the quality assurance, and quality
control operations applied to all SITE
Projects. The Quality Management Plan will
document the requirement for Quality
Assurance Project Plans for all SITE
Evaluation Projects. SITE Quality
Assurance Project Plans are currently
developed at a level that supports the
development of environmental regulations
and standards (Category II). It is important
that the SITE Program quality requirements
are met during planning, implementation and
reporting of SITE demonstrations, and
evaluations.
A-2
-------
Program Implementation
The SITE Program was established
under section 209(b) of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) (Section 311(b) of CERCLA, as
amended) to evaluate technologies for the
treatment of hazardous waste. Support for
the SITE program is part of the Agency's
base Superfund Research Program budget.
Resources to support SITE are provided by
Congress via the Agency's Superfund
appropriation.
The SITE Program is a partnership
between the public and private sectors,
where the costs and responsibilities are
shared by EPA, hazardous waste site
owners, and technology developers. EPA
enters into cooperative arrangements with
site owners and technology developers,
under which innovative technologies are
demonstrated at selected hazardous waste
sites. EPA evaluates the new technologies
based on the demonstration results, and
compiles and publishes rigorous
engineering, performance, and cost data
intended to aid in decisions regarding the
use of the technologies at other hazardous
waste sites. The program generates credible
and unbiased technology cost and
performance data needed by remedial
project managers, consultants, and other
environmental decision makers. EPA
promotes easy and rapid access to this
information, allowing project managers to
make timely decisions in selecting cleanup
remedies.
Matching Priority Sites with Innovative
Cleanup Solutions
The SITE Program solicits and
prioritizes hazardous waste sites, and then
seeks appropriate technologies for
demonstration at these sites. Priority sites
are selected based on feedback from the user
community, including federal and state
agencies. Matching a site with a technology
is a flexible process, and a site owner has the
option of evaluating multiple technologies.
If no specific technology or vendor is
identified by a site, technologies and
vendors are matched by the SITE Program
and other interested parties, which may
include state and federal regulators and other
public representatives.
An important aspect of technology
selection is that more than one technology
may be introduced for review and
demonstration. This aspect allows for
matching the most appropriate and feasible
technology to a particular site. General
technology needs of the user community are
identified by soliciting input from working
groups, forums, personal communication,
and hazardous waste publications. With this
continuous input, the SITE Program will
continue to focus on the needs of the
remediation community and the more
pressing problems at contaminated sites.
The selection of sites for the program is
based on the research needs of EPA, as well
as other federal and state agencies.
Technology Field Demonstrations
SITE Program technology demonstra-
tions are increasingly conducted in
partnership with other EPA offices, other
federal agencies, states, private industry, and
universities. These partnerships reduce the
overall costs of demonstrations to EPA,
accelerate remediation of some of the most
problematic sites at federal and state
facilities, and significantly subsidize the
technology vendors via site/logistical costs.
One example of interagency partnerships is
with DoD, Navy and the DoD
Environmental Security Technologies
Certification Program (ESTCP) in the field
demonstration and evaluation of an
innovative treatment technology for
sediments contaminated with heavy metals.
A-3
-------
Innovative remediation and
monitoring/ measurement technology/
demonstration projects are presented by
developer state and by demonstration site
state in Appendices A and B, respectively.
Information Dissemination
Electronic documents are accessible
through the internet at the SITE Program
web page (http://www. epa.gov/ORD/SITE),
Environmental Technologies Verification
(ETV) web site (http://www.epa.gov/etv),
and a site supported by the EPA Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Technology Innovation Program (TIP)
(http://clu-in. org). Several technology
databases and publications summarize
information about innovative treatment
technologies and associated vendors, and
are useful tools in identifying potential
technology demonstration candidates or
serving as directories for technology
vendors. SITE Program and other federal
demonstrations are also documented in
Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field
Scale Demonstration Projects in North
America, 2nd Edition Year 2000 Report
(http://cluin.or/products/nairt). Descriptions
of selected databases and publication
ordering information are provided in
Appendix C.
The following mechanisms are used
by the SITE Program to disseminate
information and increase interaction with the
user community:
*• Program-specific brochures and exhibits
> Conferences, workshops, and technical
working groups
> Publications and videotapes (via the
Internet:
http://www.epa.gov/ord/SITE/reports.html
> Hard copies available from EPA's
National Center for Environmental
Publications, 513-569-8190 or 1-800-
490-9192
*• Electronic media, including the Internet
> Technical assistance to regions, states,
and remediation contractors
> Technology seminars
Promotion of Innovative Technologies
SITE's mission is to promote the
development and application of innovative
technologies that reduce or eliminate risks to
human health and the environment due to
contamination. The goal of the program is
to interact with the technology user
community, understand its needs, integrate
those needs with EPA's research mission,
and expeditiously address those needs.
Identifying and responding to the
technology needs of the remediation
community is the driving force behind
today's SITE Program.
Responding to technology needs is the
driving force behind the SITE Program.
The need for credible and reliable
data for innovative technologies is
significant. Often, Records of Decision
(RODs—official records documenting
selection of Superfund site cleanup
methods) indicate that innovative
technologies were not chosen due to a lack
of verified performance and
implementability. The SITE Program serves
to fill this need for credible evaluations so
that more effective, cost-efficient methods
can be used on remediation problems.
The types and numbers of innovative
technologies selected for remediation at
Superfund sites increased significantly after
the passage of the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act (SARA). Since
then, the number has continued to rise,
A-4
-------
indicating increased credibility and
confidence in a number of innovative
treatment technologies.
During the first 12 years of the SITE
Program, an emphasis was placed on
innovative technologies for permanent
treatment that usually required the removal
(ex situ) of soil or groundwater. Most field
demonstrations during this period in the
program's history involved ex situ
physical/chemical and thermal technologies
that could be field tested in a matter of days
or weeks. In the last several years, the very
nature of ex situ technologies, which
typically involve the excavation of
contaminated soil or removal by pumping of
groundwater, and subsequent treatment
and/or transport/ disposal have become
increasingly limited in their applicability.
These cost/technical/ political related
limitations include:
. Complex contamination and subsurface
matrices which are not amenable to
removal
. Mega sites whose shear expanse and
volume of contaminated media preclude
ex situ technologies from consideration
. Lack of approved landfills in close
proximity for excavation/transportation/
disposal to be cost-effective
As a result, in situ technologies are
increasingly the only alternative. The need
for innovative, in situ technologies that are
more cost-effective, result in less secondary
waste, and are less intrusive will continue to
increase. The SITE Program has recognized
this need and has emphasized the
development of in situ technologies.
Figure A-l presents the number of in
situ technologies as a percentage of all
treatment technologies for source control by
fiscal year. Over time, use of in situ
technologies has been increasing, as the
trendline in Figure A-l shows. A 5-year
moving average of the percentage of in situ
treatment technologies shows a generally
steady increase from 28 percent (FY1985-
1988) to 65 percent (FY1999-2004).
90%
80% -
t3
Q)
•Q-
£
I
•6
70%
60%
50%
o
^ 40%
I
20%
10%
- Percentage of Source Treatment Technologies that are In Situ
•Linear Trendline (In Situ Source Treatment Projects)
*63% I---' \''
> 54%
« 47%
*48%
¥ 49%
43.%..-;
<(38%
/ .---xy
.-/-- V:
41%
36%
• 37%
28%
<>44%
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fiscal Year
Figure A-l: Superfund Remedial Actions: In Situ Technologies for Source Media for Source Control (FY1985 - FY2004)
SOURCE: U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report Draft, 12th Edition.
A-5
-------
Several factors may play a role in
this upward trend in the use of in situ
treatment technologies. Because in situ
technologies require no excavation, risk
from exposure to contaminated media is
reduced, compared with levels of risk
associated with technologies that do require
excavation. Also, in situ technologies
typically are much less harsh on the natural
habitat/environment than ex situ
technologies. Further, for large sites where
excavation and materials handling for ex situ
technologies can be expensive, in situ
technologies are often more cost-effective.
As selected innovative technologies
discussed in SITE Program Annual Reports
to Congress prior to 2002 have become
more accepted, increasingly used, and
considered the baseline for remediation, they
are now viewed as conventional
technologies for comparison to newer
technologies. These former innovative
technologies, which often performed very
successfully, have thus advanced from the
SITE Program. They include, but are not
limited to:
. Air Sparging
Soil Vapor Extraction
. Ex Situ Thermal Desorption
. Filtration
. Soil Washing
. Most ex situ remediation
The SITE Program plans to continue
to periodically evaluate whether
technologies that are no longer considered
innovative should be added to the baseline
of conventional technologies. The Program
conducted this review in FY 2002.
Historical Vendor Benefits
Technology vendors are a central
part of the SITE Program, providing
remediation services for sites requiring
cleanup solutions. As part of the SITE
Program, vendors provide historical
information on jobs they have performed for
the technologies they have demonstrated.
Vendors experience various benefits by
participating in the SITE Program, namely
increased exposure market share, technical
acceptance, and recognition. Increased
acceptance of innovative technologies is
demonstrated by the level of commercial
activity experienced by SITE Program
vendors. For example, cumulative
information reported in 2002 indicates that
since completing SITE demonstration
projects, vendors have received contracts for
2,119 cleanups and 1,388 treatability studies
(Figure A-2). Vendor surveys were not
conducted in 2004.
As part of an ongoing SITE Program
evaluation initiated in 1989, 87 vendors
have provided information regarding sales
of their technologies. Following
participation in the SITE Program, 63
percent of the responding vendors were
awarded remediation contracts using
technologies demonstrated in the SITE
Program. Thirty-four percent of the
reporting vendors have been awarded ten or
more contracts each. Over 35 percent
reported one or more international contracts,
identifying 40 countries where jobs were
contracted. Figure A-3 provides a historical
perspective of growth in the number of
contracts awarded to SITE vendors from
1990 to 2002.
The 2002 Demonstration Program
vendor information has been broken down
by technology type to ascertain which
technologies demonstrated the greatest
commercial success. Figure A-4 shows the
share by technology type of the 3,507
remediation and treatability contracts
awarded to vendors. It is clear from this
chart that soil vapor extraction and
bioremediation technologies have had the
most commercial success; in particular, soil
vapor extraction can no longer be considered
an innovative technology, as discussed
earlier in this section.
A-6
-------
3000
2500
1
| 2000
&
Q 1500
1
N
1000
500
Q _
1729
• Superfund
• Commercial
3189
1210
178
250
|
Treatability Studies Remediation Jobs International Contracts
318
Total Jobs
Figure A-2. Categorization of contracts awarded to SITE vendors following program participation.
(Source: 2002 vendor information)
4000-
3000-
•d
£ 2500-
te
*
| 2000-
B
o
O
« 1500-
1
1000-
500 -
n -
3507
3229
2874
1895
n
533
410
150 225
r-L__Cl__LJ I
1990 1991 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
Figure A-3. Total Number of contracts awarded to SITE vendors after program participation
(Source: 1990-2002 vendor information)
A-7
-------
Soil Washing Other
2%
1%
Stabilization/
Solidification-
18%
Solvent Extraction
2%
Vitrification
2%
Thermal Desorption
3%
Soil Vapor
Extraction
25%
Oxidation
2%
Electro-chemical
1%
Phytoextraction
1%
Hydraulic]
Pneumati'
Fracturing
8% I Chemical Treatment
8%
Bioremediation
21%
Figure A-4. Share of 3,507 total contracts awarded to SITE demonstration
vendors by technology type
(Source: 1990-2002 vendor information)
As shown in Figure A-5, 82
completed SITE projects have been ex situ
and 71 in- situ, with a marked increase in
ongoing in-situ technology demonstrations
as compared with ex situ since 1997.
In addition to the 87 Demonstration
Program vendors, information was obtained
from 1999 to 2002 from 18 vendors that
participated in the MMT Program. This
information clearly demonstrated the
benefits that vendors receive from the
program, indicating that 73 percent of the
vendors sold more than 25 units since their
demonstration in the SITE Program. Over
60 percent of the vendors indicated that their
technologies were used on international
remediation projects. In total, the MMT
vendors reported selling over 4,200 units on
1,043 jobs, including 56 international jobs.
Overall, vendor information shows
that SITE technology developers in the
Demonstration and MMT Programs are
achieving commercial success for
demonstrated technologies. The impact of
the SITE Program continues to be
significant, as illustrated by the volume of
vendor contracts from 1990-2002 (Figure
A-3).
A-8
-------
ococococo
o c o
O=ongoing
C= complete 97 gg ^^^^^_^^^@^^^^@4^_^^@^^_^^3^^^^^
Figure A-5. History of Ex Situ vs. In Situ Distribution of SITE Demonstration Projects
Innovative Technology Highlights ~ SITE
Program Case Studies
This section presents case studies of
innovative remediation technologies for
vendors that have participated in the SITE
Program. The case studies provide brief
descriptions on the use and status of
representative technologies. It is typical of
the SITE Program and represents the SITE
Program's approach to promoting innovative
technologies by identifying user needs. In
response to user needs, the SITE Program
assessed the performance of a chemical
oxidation technology and steam enhanced
remediation projects.
Case Study 1: Steam Enhanced
Remediation at Loring Air Force Base
The U.S. EPA SITE Program
evaluated the Steam Enhanced Remediation
(SER) technology for the recovery of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
fracture limestone. The evaluation was
conducted at an abandoned quarry at the
former Loring Air Force Base (AFB) in
Limestone, Maine. The project was carried
out by United States Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Office of
Research and Development (ORD) National
Risk Management Research Laboratory
(NRMRL), U.S. EPA's SITE Program, U.S.
EPA Region I, Maine Department of
Environmental Protection (MEDEP),
SteamTech Environmental Services, Inc, the
United States Air Force (USAF), and
experts from academia on characterization
of fractured rock and steam injection
remediation.
Technology Description
SER is an in situ thermal cleanup
technology for the reduction of organic
contaminants. Steam is injected into the
contaminated area and vapor, water, and
contaminants are extracted via extraction
wells. Specific objectives for the research
project included determining if SER could:
1) heat the target area for remediation, 2)
enhance contaminant recovery, and 3)
reduce contaminant concentrations in the
rock and groundwater.
A-9
-------
Construction of the system was
initiated in August 2002, and the extraction
system started operating on August 30 of
that year. Steam injection was initiated on
September 1, 2002 and continued until
November 19, 2002. Throughout
operations, EPA's SITE program collected
effluent vapor and water samples to
document the recovery rate and amount of
contaminants recovered. SteamTech
collected temperature data using 22
thermocouple strings, and documented
changes in subsurface resistivity caused by
temperature increases or by steam replacing
water in the fractures using electrical
resistance tomography (ERT).
Status
Effluent vapor and water samples
collected at the site showed that after
approximately three weeks of operations, the
extraction rates started to increase, and they
continued to increase for the duration of the
project. The highest extraction rates were
achieved at the end of the project, after
steam injection had ceased and air injection
was increased. This is believed to be due to
air stripping of VOCs at the higher
subsurface temperatures, which carried the
vaporized contaminants to extraction wells.
Effluent samples showed that more than 7.4
kg (16.2 Ibs) of contaminants were
recovered during the project, of which 5.0
kg (11.12 Ibs) were chlorinated VOCs, 0.55
kg (1.22 Ibs) were gasoline range organics
(GRO), and 1.77 kg (3.9 Ibs) were diesel
range organics (DRO). Results of the
evaluation indicated that for large, simple-
to-moderately complex fractured rock sites,
SER may be an effective and cost-effective
remediation technology for VOCs.
Case Study 2: In-Situ Duox™ Chemical
Oxidation Technology Demonstration
The U.S. EPA SITE Program is
evaluating the feasibility of applying the
Duox™ chemical oxidation technology to
chlorinated solvent contaminated media at
the Roosevelt Mills site in Vernon,
Connecticut. The demonstration began in
2001. The Roosevelt Mills site is a former
woolen mill that included dry cleaning and
metal plating operations. Operations at the
site have led to the contamination of soil and
ground water. The parties involved in the
technology demonstration include the U.S.
EPA SITE Program, the Environmental
Research Institute at the University of
Connecticut (the developer) and the Town of
Vernon, Connecticut.
Technology Description
The Duox™ technology destroys
unsaturated chlorinated solvents by utilizing
a combination of two oxidants. The most
economical oxidants typically used are
sodium persulfate and potassium
permanganate. The in-situ chemical
oxidation process involves the injection of a
solution containing one or more oxidants
into the subsurface to mineralize the target
contaminants.
The process typically involves
injection of the sodium persulfate into the
subsurface. The sodium persulfate
mineralizes target contaminants and satisfies
the soil oxidant demand. The sodium
persulfate also reduces the quantity of
potassium permanganate needed to
mineralize the target compounds. The
sequential dual treatment process can be
repeated as many times as necessary to
reduce contaminant concentrations. The
costs to remediate chlorinated solvent sites
using the Duox™ Technology could be
significantly less than conventional
remediation methods.
Status
Results of the technology evaluation,
which consisted of conducting a lab-based
treatability study of the Duox™ Technology
for both dissolved chlorinated organics in
groundwater, as well as free-phase PCE in
the shallow fill material, have indicated that
A-10
-------
permanganate alone and in combination
with persulfate is feasible in remediating
chlorinated solvents in the site groundwater
as well as in soil samples. The remediation
project will reduce the risk to public health
from the chlorinated solvents. In addition,
the costs involved in the remediation using
the Duox™ Technology are significantly
lower than the original cost estimates
involving other remediation methods.
Following remediation of the site, a
developer has proposed to convert the
abandoned site into a mixed use
retail/housing complex.
Case Study 3: Steam-Enhanced
Remediation at Port ofRidgefield
The U.S. EPA SITE Program is
evaluating Steam-Enhanced Remediation
(SER) technology at the Lake River
Industrial Site (LRIS) at the Port of
Ridgefield (PoR) in Ridgefield, Washington.
SER is designed to remove non-aqueous
phase liquid (NAPL) contamination from
surface and subsurface soils as well as
groundwater, while preventing migration of
contamination from the site.
The former wood-treating company
on the LRIS site used a variety of wood-
treating chemicals, including creosote,
pentachloro-phenol (PCP) dissolved in a
carrier oil, chromated copper arsenate, and
copper naphthenate, for the purpose of
treating milled lumber, utility poles, and
pilings.
Technology Description
SER is an in situ thermal soil
cleanup technology that is being applied
through a steam injection system and an
aggressive vapor- and liquid-extraction
system for the reduction of organic
contaminants from the source zone. The
fundamental approach of SER is to sweep
the treatment volume with steam and to
extract vapor, water, and contaminants with
extraction wells. This removal action is
designed to maximize NAPL removal from
the area; to prevent migration of
contamination from the site by establishing
pneumatic and hydraulic control between
the source area and the Ridgefield National
Wildlife Refuge (RNWR), which abuts the
LRIS; and to collect data to refine design
parameters for the full-scale remedial
operation, which will immediately follow
the removal action.
Status
Steam was first applied at the site in
May 2004. Two SITE sampling events have
been conducted at the PoR. During SITE's
demonstration field work, samples of the
off-gas stream from the well field, the gas
stack to the atmosphere, the liquids and
solids collected in the SER receiving tanks,
and the treated water were collected to
determine the effectiveness of the treatment
and to evaluate any impacts to the RNWR.
Samples of groundwater from the EPA-
installed well clusters in the RNWR and in
three peripheral locations on site were also
collected. Analyses and the associated
"The SITE Program has helped start us
in 1991, and has provided
unimpeachable confirmation of the
capabilities of BioGenesis washing
technology. Thirteen years later,
BioGenesis is working with SITE in an
international cooperation project in
Venice and on New Jersey's effort to
clean up the Passaic River. Such
longevity in organizational relationships
speaks for itself in showing that SITE
efficiently serves the needs of both
government and commercial
stakeholders."
Charles L. Wilde,
Executive Vice President
Biogenesis Enterprises, Inc.
A-ll
-------
validation are currently being performed.
The SITE Program continues to
emphasize the need for technologies that
focus more on types of contaminated sites
rather than single contaminants (i.e., wood
preserving sites, manufactured gas plant
sites). Most sites are not contaminated with
a single contaminant, but with mixtures
including by-products formed from normal
degradation. Recent applications have led
the SITE Program to move in this direction.
Based on input from the multi-agency
review board, a list of new priority areas are:
. Sediments
. Mining Issues\Acid Mine Drainage
. Manufactured Gas Plants
. Wood TreatingVPreserving
. Pesticide ManufacturersVFormulators
Table A-l outlines the contaminant areas of
interest, and Table A-2 describes the
demonstrations that are planned for FY 05.
Table A-l. Future Contaminant Emphasis Areas
Groundwater/Surface Water
Sediments
Soils
DNAPL\Chlorinated Solvents
Arsenic, Mercury or other Heavy Metals
PCBs
PCBs
Arsenic, Mercury, or other Heavy Metals
PAHs
Pesticides
DNAPL
Arsenic, Mercury, or
other Heavy Metals
Chlorinated Solvents
PCBs
Table A-2. SITE Program Projects Planned for FY 05
Site Name/Location
Oscar 2 Pier Site
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
Venice, Italy and
Passaic River, New
Jersey
Former MFC Site
Hudson, New
Hampshire
Grand Plaza
Shopping Center
Dallas, Texas
Navy Dodge Pond Site
Niantic, Connecticut
Technology
Microbial cell
technology
BioGenesis™ Sediment
washing system
XDD In-situ chemical
oxidation
Triad Site
Characterization Vapor
Intrusion
Bauxite sediment
capping and treatment
Project Description
Evaluate anaerobic
biological removal of
PCBs in oil
Evaluate innovative
treatment for PCB-
contaminated sediment
In-situ chemical
oxidation of chlorinated
organics in groundwater
Remediation of
chlorinated solvents and
vapor intrusion
Evaluation of in-situ
capping and treatment
for metal-contaminated
sediment
Proposed Schedule
Demonstration FY05
Venice Demonstration FY05
New lersey Demonstration
FY05
Demonstration FY05
Demonstration FY05
Demonstration FY05
A-12
-------
Partnerships for Success
Federal to Federal Interface
The SITE Program continues to
recognize the importance of cooperation
between federal agencies to find common
areas of need and interest. Interfacing with
other federal agencies is an important aspect
of enhancing the benefits of technology
demonstrations. It allows for leveraging
resources, expedited performance, cost
information exchange, and cross-fertilization
of technical expertise between agencies. In
addition, this type of collaboration
encourages the implementation of
innovative approaches by federal end users
in a more expedited manner and, in many
cases, implementation at other non-federal
site locations.
Federal to State Interface
Where there are common
environmental areas of interest, it is equally
important to have federal to state
interactions, as it is to have federal-to-
federal cooperation. Cooperation with
organizations such as the Environmental
Council of States (ECOS) and Interstate
Technology Regulatory Council (ITRC)
promotes partnerships and builds confidence
within the environmental community that
proven innovative technology can provide
more effective and less-expensive
environmental protection.
The ITRC provides a mechanism to
interact with multiple state regulatory
agencies and state specific verification
programs. The ITRC is a state-led national
coalition dedicated to achieving better
environmental protection through the use of
innovative technologies.
An example of the federal-to-
state/local government interface is
demonstrated at the Anacostia River SITE
Demonstration. The city of Washington,
DC and the U.S. EPA's Hazardous
Substance Research Center are collaborating
on the development of innovative capping
technologies for contaminated sediment. A
visitor's day was held at the Anacostia River
site in April 2004 to discuss the technologies
with public interest groups and stakeholders.
Louisiana Senator Landrieu and Washington
D.C. Mayor Anthony Williams attended the
visitors' day.
Information Transfer
Information transfer is accomplished
through a number of mechanisms. While
the Internet information distribution is an
effective mechanism, meetings, published
documentation, and conferences remain an
essential part of technical information
dissemination.
Coordination with existing
remediation workgroups and programs is
also essential. The SITE Program continues
to work cooperatively with numerous
programs, such as DOD's ESTCP Program,
the Environmental Council of States
(ECOS) sponsored ITRC, and the DOE's
Science and Technology Program.
ITRC Team meetings and special
site tours have been conducted near SITE
Program field demonstrations in order to
capitalize on the participation of multiple
States.
A-13
-------
Appendix B
SITE PROJECTS
(Alphabetically by Developer State)
B-l
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Alabama
CMS Research
Corporation
Birmingham, AL
Portable Gas
Chromatograph
H. Ashley Page
205-773-6911
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed 1992
Arctic Foundations
Anchorage, AK
Brice Environmental
Service Corp.
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Freeze Barrier
Soil Washing Plant
Ed Yarmak
907-562-2741
Craig Jones
907-452-2512
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1998
Completed 1992
Arizona
Arizona State
University
Tempe, AZ
STC Omega (formerly
Silicate Technology
Corporation)
Scottsdale, AZ
Photocatalytic Oxidation
and Air Stripping
Solidification and
Stabilization Treatment
Gregory Raupp
606-965-2828
Elliot Berman
352-867-1320
Stephen Pelger
Scott Larsen
602-948-7100
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1999
Completed 1990
California
Analytical and
Remedial Technology,
Inc.,
Milpitas, CA
ARCO
CA
Berkeley
Environmental
Restoration Center
(formerly Udell
Technologies, Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Binax Corp., Antox
Division
Sunnyville, CA
COGNIS, Inc.
Santa Rosa, CA
Eco Mat, Inc.
Hayward, CA
Automated Sampling and
Analytical Platform
Lime Lagoons
In situ Enhanced Extraction
Imunoassay for PCB in Soil
Biological/ Chemical
Treatment
Biological Denitrification
Gary Hopkins
408-263-8931
Baffy Duff
406-563-5211
Kent Udell
510-642-2928
Steve Collins
510-643-1300
Richard
Lankow
408-752-1353
Steve Rock
U.S. EPA
513-569-7149
Kim Halley
510-783-5885
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1991
Completed 2004
Completed 1993
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 2000
B-2
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
California (continued)
Energy and
Environmental Research
Corporation
Irvine, CA
Energy and
Environmental Research
Corporation
Irvine, CA
Environmental
Biotechnologies
Montara, CA
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
General Atomics
(formerly Ogden
Environmental Services)
San Diego, CA
Geokinetics
Berkeley, CA
Geokinetics
Berkeley, CA
Geokinetics & Duke
Engineering
GIS\Solutions, Inc.
Concord, CA
Groundwater
Technology
Government Services,
Inc.
Concord, CA
Hughes Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Manhattan Beach, CA
Integrated Water
Resources, Inc.
Lockheed Martin
Missiles & Space Co.,
Inc.
Palo Alto, CA
Hybrid Fluidized Bed
System
Reactor Filter System
Microbial Composting
Precipitation,
Microfiltration, Sludge
Dewatering
Circulating Bed Combuster
Acoustic Barrier Separator
Electrokinetics
Closed Loop Lead Recovery
Electrokinetic Heating &
Surfactant Flushing
GISYKey
Environmental Data
Management Software
Biological Composting
Steam Enhanced Recovery
Process
Stripping of TCE
Electrokinetic
Remediation
Richard
Koppang
714-859-8851
Neil Widmer
714-859-8851
Douglas
Munnecke
415-596-1020
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
Anthony
Gattuso
619-455-2910
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
Ronald Hicks
510-671-2387
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
805-565-0996
Steven H.
Schwartzkopf
415-424-3176
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1999
Completed
Completed 1993
Completed 1989
Completed 1995
Completed 2000
Completed 2002
Completed 1999
Completed 1993
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Completed 2002
Completed
B-3
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
California (continued)
Magnum Water
Technology
El Segundo, CA
Membrane
Technology and
Research, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
North American
Technologies Aprotek
San Ramon, CA
NOVATERRA, Inc.
(formerly Toxic
Treatments USA, Inc.)
Los Angeles, CA
Praxis Environmental
Services
Burlingame, CA
Pulse Sciences,
San Leandro, CA
Radian Corporation
(formerly AWD
Technologies, Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
Regenesis
Retech, Inc.
Ukiah, CA
Rochem Separation
Systems, Inc.
Torrance, CA
Roy F. Weston
Sherman Oaks, CA
Simulprobe
Technologies, Inc.
SIVE Services
Dixon, CA
CAV-OX Process
VaporSep Membrane
Process
Oleofilter
In- situ and Air Stripping
In- situ Steam Enhanced
Extraction
X-Ray Treatment
(Aqueous)
X-Ray Treatment
(Soils)
Integrated Vapor Extraction
and Steam Vacuum
Stripping
Biological Treatment, HRC
of Organics
Plasma Arc Vitrification
Rochem Disc Tube Module
System
In well Air Stripping
Core Barrel Soil Sampler
Steam Injection and Vacuum
Extraction
Dale Cox
310-322-4143
Jack Simser
310-640-7000
Marc Jacobs
Doug
Gottschlich
415-328-2228
Cathryn
Wimberly
916-366-6185
Philip LaMori
310-328-9433
Lloyd Stewart
415-641-9044
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
Vernon Bailey
510-632-5100
ext. 227
David Bluestein
415-227-0822
Dr. Stephen
Koeningberg
949-366-8000
Ronald
Womack Leroy
B. Leland 707-
462-6522
David
LaMonica
310-370-3160
JeffBannon
818-971-4900
Eric Klingel
704-660-1673
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Douglas Dieter
916-678-8358
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Completed
Completed 1989
Completed 1997
Completed 1994
Completed
Completed 1990
Completed 2002
Completed 1991
Completed 1994
Completed 1994
Completed
Exited
B-4
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
California (continued)
SRI Instruments
Torrance, CA
State of California
Steam Tech
Environmental Services
Bakersfield, CA
Terra-Kleen Response
Group, Inc.
Del Mar, CA
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
Thermatrix, Inc.
(Formerly Purus, Inc.)
San Jose, CA
U.S. EPA Region IX
San Francisco, CA
U.S. Filter
(formerly Ultrox)
Santa Ana, CA
Weiss Associates
Emeryville, CA
Xon Tech, Inc.
VanNuys, CA
X-19 Biological
Products, Inc.
Portable Gas Chromatograph
Biphasic Lime Treatment
In-situ Thermal (Steam
Injection)
Solvent Extraction
Entrained-Bed Gasification
Photolytic Oxidation
Excavation and Foam
Suppression of Volatiles
Ultraviolet Radiation and
Oxidation
Electrochemcial
Geoxidation
Xon Tech Sector Sampler
Microbial Degradation of
PCBs
Douglas
Gavilanes
310-214-5092
Chris Stetler
530-542-5461
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478
Alan Cash
619-558-8762
John Winter
310-908-7387
Steve McAdams
408-453-0490
John Blevins
415-744-2400
John Lowry
412-722-1247
Joe Lovenitti
510-450-6141
Matt Young
818-787-7380
Paul E. Gill
408-970-9485
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed 2004
Completed 2003
Completed 1994
Completed 1997
Completed 1994
Completed 1992
Completed 1990
Completed 1989
Completed 2003
Completed 1991
Completed 2002
Colorado
CF Systems Corporation
Arvada, CO
Colorado Dept. of
Health
Denver, CO
Colorado School of
Mines, Golden, CO
and Colorado
Department of Health
Denver, CO
Solvent Extraction
Batch Organics Extraction
Unit
Wetland-Based Treatment
for Mineral Mine Drainage
Wetlands-Based
Treatment
L.V.
Benningfield
303-420-1550
L.V.
Benningfield
303-420-1550
Jim Lewis
303-692-3390
Thomas
Wildeman
303-273-3642
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Completed 1988
Completed
Completed 1999
Completed
B-5
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Colorado (continued)
General Environmental
Corporation
Englewood, CO
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Region 8 and State of
Colorado
Rocky Mountain
Remediation Services
Golden, CO
Smith Environmental
Technologies
Corporation (formerly
Canonie Environmental
Services Corp.)
Englewood, CO
Electrocoagulation
Biodegradation of Cyanide
Biostabilization of Lead
Biostabilization of Mercury
Mining Wastes
Biological Stabilization of
Arsenic in Soils
Multiple Innovative Passive
mine Drainage Technologies
Environmental Soil
Amendment (Stabilization)
Low Temperature Thermal
Aeration
Anaerobic Thermal
Processor
Carl Dalrymple
303-761-6960
Caren Caldwell
303-367-8443
Leslie
Thompson
303-367-8443
Leslie
Thompson
303-367-8443
Leslie
Thompson
303-367-8443
Victor
Kettellapper
303-312-6578
Jim Barthel
303-215-6620
Joseph Hutton
303-790-1747
Joseph Hutton
303-790-1747
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1995
Completed 1998
Completed 2000
Completed
Completed 2000
Completed 2001
Completed
Completed 1992
Completed 1991
Connecticut
Dexsil Corporation
Hamden, CT
4 demonstrations
University of
Connecticut
Milestone
Monroe, CT
E.I. DuPont de Nemours
and Co. and Oberlin
Filter Co.
Newark, DE and
Waukesha, WI
Environmental Test Kits
(PCB) Chlor-N-Soil
L2000 PCB/Chloride
Analyzer
Permanganate/Persulfate
Oxidation Treatment for
PCE
Thermal Decomposition,
Atomic Absorption
Membrane Micro filtration
Jack Mahon
203-288-3509
George Hoag
860-486-2781
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
Ernest Mayer
302-774-2277
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Ongoing
Completed 2003
Completed 1990
B-6
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Delaware
Hewlett-Packard
(formerly MTI
Analytical Instruments)
Wilmington, DE
Remediation
Technology
Development Forum,
HSRC
Strategic Diagnostics
Inc. (formerly Ensys,
Inc.)
Newark, DE
Portable Gas Chromatograph
Innovative Capping Design
Immunoassay for PCP
Immunoassay and
Colorimetry for Dioxin
Hewlett-
Packard
800-227-9770
Bob Belair
302-633-8487
Richard Jensen
302-695-4685
TimLawruk
800-544-8881
302-456-6782
Bob Ferguson
1-800-544-8881
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed 1992
Ongoing
Completed 1993
Completed 2004
Florida
Funderburk and
Associates
Apollo Beach, FL
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications,
Inc. /Florida
International University
and University of Miami
Miami, FL
High Voltage
Environmental
Applications, Inc.
Miami, FL
PCP, Inc.
West Palm Beach, FL
Dechlorination and
Immobilization
High-Energy Electron
Irradiation
(Aqueous)
High Energy Electronic
Beam (Solids)
Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Ray Funderburk
800-723-8847
William Cooper
910-962-3450
William Cooper
305-593-5330
Martin Cohen
407-683-0507
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed 1997
Completed 1993
Completed 1994
Completed
Completed 1991
Georgia
American Combustion,
Inc.
Norcross, GA
ETC., Inc.
Norcross, GA
Sonotech, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Williams Environmental
Services, Inc. (Formerly
Harmon Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Stone Mountain, GA
PYRETRON
Thermal Destruction
Long-Path Fourier
Transform Infrared
Spectrometer
Frequency Tunable Pulse
Combustion System
Soil Washing
Gregory Gitman
404-564-4180
Orman Simpson
404-242-0977
Ben Zinn
404-894-3033
S. Jackson
Hubbard
(U.S. EPA)
513-569-7507
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Completed 1988
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Exited 1992
B-7
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Microbial Cell Technology
Dr. Ping-Yi
Yang
808-956-8459
Aquatic Research
Instruments
Aquatic Research
Instruments
Argonne National
Laboratory West
Idaho Fall, ID
Art's Manufacturing
and Supply
J.R. Simplot Co.
Pocatello, ID
Morrison Knudsen
Corp./STG
Technologies
Boise, ID
Process Technologies,
Inc.
Boise, ID
U.S. DOE/ Duke
Engineering
Lockheed, ID
Sediment Core Sampler
Russian Peat Borer
Phytoremediation of
Radionuclides
AMS™ Dual-Tube Liner
Soil Sampler
AMS™ Split Core Sampler
Anaerobic Biological
Process
Anaerobic Biological
Process
Grouting Technique
Photolytic Destruction of
SVE off-gases
Surfactant Enhanced
Acquifer Remediation
Will Young
208-768-2222
Will Young
208-768-2222
Scott Lee
208-533-7829
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Russell Kaake
208-235-5620
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Kathryn Levihn
Rick Raymondi
208-386-6115
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Michael Shook
208-526-6945
Monitoring and Measurement
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed
Completed
Ongoing
Completed
Completed 1999
Completed 1993
Completed 1994
Completed
Exited
Completed 1999
Illinois
Allied Signal
Corporation
Des Plains, IL
Argonne National
Laboratory East
GTI
Des Plaines, IL
Oxford Instruments
Submerged Aerobic Fixed
Film Reactor
Phyroremediation of
Radionuclides
Thermal Sediment Reuse
Technology
XRF Analyzer
Steve Lupton
708-391-3500
Christina Negri
Anil Goyal
847-768-0605
Ruhre Gehrien
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed
Completed 2003
Ongoing
Ongoing
B-8
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Illinois (continued)
Institute of Gas
Technology
Institute of Gas
Technology
OHM Environmental
(formerly RUST
Remedial Services, Inc.)
Lombard, IL
Recycling Sciences, Inc.
Chicago, IL
Wheelabrator Clean Air
Systems (formerly
Chemical Waste
Management)
Schaumburg, IL
Chemical and Biological
Treatment
Fluid Extraction-Biological
Degradation Process
Fluidized-Bed Cyclonic
Agglomerating Incinerator
Superficial
Extraction/Liquid Phase
Oxidation of Waste
X-TRAX Thermal
Desorption
Desorption and Vapor
Extraction System
Evaporation and Chemical
Oxidation
Robert Kelley
847-768-0722
Albert Paterek
847-768-0720
Mike Mensinger
847-768-0602
Amir Rehmat
847-768-0588
Mike Mensinger
847-768-0602
Dick Ay en
803-646-2413
William
Meenan
312-663-4269
Bob Hernquist
708-706-6900
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Completed 1992
Completed
Completed
Completed 1992
Completed
Completed
Indiana
Bio-Rem, Inc.
Butler, IN
Geoprobe
Salina, KS
Sevenson
Environmental Services,
Inc.
Munster, IN
Sevenson
Environmental Services,
Inc.
Munster, IN
Soil Tech, ATP Systems
Inc
Porter, IN
Augmented In-situ
Subsurface Bioremediation
Process
Soil, Water, Vapor
Sampling Cone
Penetrometer
Chemical Stabilization of
Mercury Mining Wastes
MAECTITE®
Treatment Process
Thermal Desorption
David Mann
219-868-5823
800-428-4626
Wes McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
Chuck
McPheeters
219-836-0116
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Demonstration
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Completed 1995
Exited
Completed 2000
Completed 1992
Clements Associates,
Inc.
JMC Environmentalist's Subsoil
Probe
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed
B-9
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Large Bore Soil Sampler
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed
Micro sensor System,
Inc.
Bowling Green, KY
Portable Gas Chromatograph
Monitoring and Measurement
Completed 1995
Advanced Remediation
Mixing, Inc. (Formerly
Chemfix Technologies,
Inc.)
Kenner, LA
Electrokinetics, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
SBP Technologies, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Solidification and
Stabilization
Electrokinetic Remediation
Electro-Klean
Electrokinetic
Soil Remediation
Membrane Separation and
Bioremediation
Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466
Elif Acar
504-388-3992
Elif Acar
504-753-8004
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1989
Completed 1989
Exited
Exited
Completed
1995
Cape Technologies
South Portland, ME
Quadrel Services, Inc.
DFI Immunoassay for
Dioxin
Emflux® Soil-Gas Survey
System
Bob Harrison
207-741-2995
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed 2004
Completed
W. L. Gore and
Associates, Inc.
Gore-Scrubber® Passive
Soil Gas Sampler
Ray
Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Monitoring and Measurement
Technologies
Completed
Massachusetts
ABB Environmental
Services, Inc.
Wakefield, MA
Harding Lawson
Associates (formally
ABB Environmental
Services, Inc.)
Wakefield, MA
Harding-Lawson
Engineers
Wakefield, MA
Anaerobic/
Aerobic Sequential
Bioremediation
Two-Zone Plume
Interception In-situ
Treatment Strategy
In-situ Anerobic-aerotic
Bioremediation
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
Jaret Johnson
Willard Murray
617-245-6606
William Murray
617-245-6606
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1998
Completed
Completed 2003
B-10
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Massachusetts (continued)
Braker Instruments
Billerica, MA
HNU Systems, Inc.
Newtown, MA
HNU Systems, Inc.
Newtown, MA
Innov-X Systems, Inc.
Woburn, MA
KSE, Inc.
Amherst, MA
Maxymillian
Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Clean
Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
Millipore Corporation
Bedford, MA
Niton Corporation
Bedford, MA
Niton Corp.
Billerica, MA
Ohmicron Corporation
Newton, MA
PSI Technology Co.
Andover, MA
Rontel USA, Inc.
Carlisle, MA
Terra-Therm LLC
Fitchburg, MA
UV Technologies, Inc.
(formerly Energy and
Environmental
Engineering, Inc.)
East Cambridge, MA
Bruker Mobile
Environmental Monitor
Portable Gas Chromatograph
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometer
XRF Analyzer
Air II Photocatalytic
Technology for Air Streams
High Temperature Thermal
Process
EnviroGard PCB
Immunoassay Test Kit
Immunoassay for PCP (Soil,
Water)
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometer
X-Ray Fluorescence
Analyzer
XRF Analyzer
Immunoassay for PCP in
Soil
Immobilize and
Decontaminate Metals in
Aggregate Solids
XRF Analyzer
In-Situ Thermal
Laser-Induced
Photochemical Oxidative
Destruction
Dr. Brian
Abraham
508-667-9580
Jack Driscoll
800-724-6690
617-964-6690
Jack Driscoll
800-724-6690
617-964-6690
Rose Koch
781-938-5005
James Kittrell
413-549-5506
Jim
Maxymillian
413-499-3050
Alan Weiss
617-275-9200
Alan Weiss
617-275-9200
Don Sackett
781-275-9275
Debbie Schatzlein
Debbie Schatzlein
Mary Hayes
215-860-5115
Joseph Morency
508-689-0003
Paul Smith
978-266-2900
Ralph Baker 978-
343-0300
John Roll
James Porter
617-666-5500
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Emerging Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Completed
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Ongoing
Completed 1999
Completed 1993
Completed 1992
Completed 1993
Completed 1995
Completed 2003
Ongoing
Completed 1993
Completed 1993
Ongoing
Completed 2002
Completed 1993
B-ll
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Michigan (and Mississippi)
Army Corps of
Engineers
Limnotech
Ann Arbor, MI
Phytoremediation
In-Situ Hydrogen-Enhanced
Remediation
Detroit, MI and
Vicksburg, MS
John Wolfe
734-332-1200
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 2003
Ongoing
Minnesota
BioTrol Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Membrane Corporation
Minneapolis, MN
Biotreatment of
Groundwater
Methanotropic Bioreactor
System
Biological Aqueous
Treatment System
Soil Washing System
Membrane Gas Transfer in
Waste Remediation
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Durell Dobbins
612-942-8032
Durell Dobbins
612-942-8032
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Charles Gantzer
612-378-2160
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Completed 1989
Completed 1992
Completed 1989
Completed 1989
Discontinued
Missouri
COGNIS TERRAMET
Gross, MO
Removal of Lead from Soils
Lou Magdits
573-626-3476
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Montana
Montana College of
Mineral Science and
Technology
Butte, MT
Air-Sparged Hydrocyclone
Campbell Centrifugal Jig
Theodore Jordan
406-496-4112
406-496-4193
Gordon Ziesing
406-496-1573
406-496-4193
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Completed 1994
Ongoing
Nebraska
University of Nebraska
Lincoln, NE
Spray Irrigation
Ray Spalding
402-483-3931
Demonstration
Completed 1996
Nevada
U.S. EPA
Las Vegas, NV
University of Nevada,
Reno
Reno, NV
Field Analytical Screening
Program
(FASP)
Passive Constructed
Wetlands
Howard Fribush
703-603-8831
Larry Jack
702-798-2373
Tim Tsukamoto
775-784-4413
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1996
Ongoing
New Hampshire
XDD, LLC
Stratham, NH
In-Situ Chemical Oxidation
Ken Sperry
484-224-3031
Demonstration
Ongoing
B-12
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
New Jersey
Accutech Inc
Keyport, NJ and
New Jersey Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ
ART International, Inc.
(formerly Enviro
Sciences, Inc.)
Denville, NJ
Dehydro-Tech.
Corporation
Somerville, NJ
Geotech Development
Corporation
Newark, NJ
Envirogen, Inc.
Lawrenceville, NJ
Metorex
Ewing, NJ
M.L. ENERGIA, Inc.
Princeton, NJ
M.L. ENERGIA, Inc.
Princeton, NJ
New Jersey Institute of
Technology, Hazardous
Substance Management
Research Center
Newark, NJ
New Jersey Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ and
GeoTech Development
Corporation
King of Prussia, PA
New Jersey Institute of
Technology
Newark, NJ
Phytotech, Inc.
Monmouth, NJ
Sentex Sensing
Technology, Inc.
Ridgefield, NJ
Solucorp
Saddle Back, NJ
Pneumatic Fracturing
Extraction and Hot Gas
Injection
Low-Energy Solvent
Extraction Process
Carver-Greenfield Process
for Extraction of Oily Waste
Cold Top Vitrification
Microbial Degradation/
Solvent Extraction
XRF
Reductive Photo-
Dechlorination Treatment
Reductive
Photo-Thermal Oxidation
Processes for Chlorocarbons
Pneumatic Fracturing/
Bioremediation
Cold Top Vitrification
GHEA Associates Process
Phytoextraction of metal
from soil
Portable Gas Chromatograph
Molecular Bonding System
John Liskowitz
908-739-6444
Werner Steiner
201-627-7601
Theodore
Trowbridge
908-904-1606
William Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Ronald Unterman
(609) 936-9300
John Patterson
609-406-9000
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
Moshe Lavid
609-799-7970
John Schuring
201-596-5849
David Kosson
908-445-4346
William Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
Itzhak Gottlieb
201-226-4642
Burt Ensley
908-438-0900
Amos Linenberg
201-945-3694
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed 1994
Completed 1991
Exited
Completed 2000
Completed 2003
Completed 1995
Completed
Completed 1992
Exited
Completed 1992
Completed 1998
Completed 1992
Completed
B-13
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
New Mexico
Billings and Associates,
Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Commodore Advanced
Sciences, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Resource Management
and Recovery (formerly
Bio-Recovery Systems,
Inc.)
Las Graces, NM
Sandia National
Laboratories
Albuquerque, NM
Thermo Nutech
(formerly TMA
Eberline)
Albuquerque, NM
Subsurface Volatilization
and Ventilation System
Set Process for PCBs in soil
AlgaSorb Biological
Sorption
Electrokinetic Extraction in
Unsaturated Soils
Segmented Gate System for
Radioactive Materials
Gale Billings
505-345-1116
Don Brenneman
713-676-5324
Mark Jones
505-872-6803
Mike Ho sea
505-382-9228
Eric Lindgren
505-844-3820
Earl Mattson
505-856-3311
Jeff Brown
423-481-0683
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Completed 1994
Completed 2000
Completed 1990
Completed 1999
Completed
New York
Pasacelsian
Ithaca, NY
Photovac International,
Inc.
Deer Park, NY
SBP Technologies, Inc.
White Plains, NY
RECRA Environmental,
Inc.
(formerly Electro-Pure
Systems, Inc.)
Amherst, NY
State University of New
York at Oswego
Oswego, NY
Texaco Syngas, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Xcalibur XRF Services,
Inc.
Islandia, NY
Xerox Corporation
Webster, NY
Cellular Receptor
Immunoassay for Dioxin
Portable Gas Chromatograph
Bioventing, Air Sparging,
Biological Treatment for
Ground Water (multi-
developer project with State
of New York)
Alternating Current
Electrocoagula-tion
Technology
Photocatalytic Treatment for
Sediments
Gasification Process
XRF Analyzers
Ground Water Extraction
Amy Hall
888-689-4224
Mark Collins
516-254-4199
Richard Desrosiers
914-694-2280
Nick Kolak
518-457-3372
Kenneth Kinecki
800-527-3272
Ronald Scrudato
Jeffrey
Shiarenzelli
315-341-3639
John Winter
316-251-4000 ext.
536
631-435-9749
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
Phil Mook
916-643-5443
Monitoring and
Measurement Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Completed 2004
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1994
Ongoing
Completed 1995
B-14
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
North Carolina
Hybrizyme
Raleigh, NC
MTI, Inc.
Wilmington, NC
Xenobiotics
Durham, NC
Immunoassay and
Colorimetry for Dioxin
Anodic Stripping
Voltametry
Cell Based Immunoassay for
Dioxin
Randy Allen
919-783-9595
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
JeffSturkey
919-688-4804
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Completed 2004
Completed 2003
Competed 2004
ASC/EMR
Wright Patterson AFB
Dayton, OH
Babock and Wilcox
Alliance Research
Center
Alliance, OH
Battelle Memorial
Institute
Columbus, OH
Commodore
Environmental
Columbus, Ohio
Ferro Corporation
Independence, OH
IT Corporation
Cincinnati, OH
IT Corporation (formerly
OHM Remediation
Services Corp.)
Findlay, OH
Monsanto/ Dupont
Cincinnati, OH
Ohio Lumex Co.
Twinsburg, OH
University of Dayton
Research Institute
Dayton, OH
US EPA Mobile Volume
Reduction Unit
Cincinnati, Ohio
U.S. EPA NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Phytoremediation of TCE in
Groundwater
Cyclone Vitrification
In-situ Electroacoustic Soil
Decontamination
Solvated Electron Treatment
of Chlorinated Organics
Waste Vitrification
Through Electric Melting
Chelation/
Electro-deposition of Toxic
Metals from Soil
Oxygen Microbubble
In-situ Bioremediation
In-situ Electroosmosis of
TCE in soil/ Groundwaters
"Lasagna Process"
Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy
Photothermal Detoxification
Unit (PDU)
Soil Washing
Bioventing
Greg Harvey
513-255-7716
Lawrence King
216-829-7576
Satya Chauhan
614-424-4812
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365
S.K. Muralidhar
216-641-8580
Radha Krishnan
513-782-4700
Douglas Jerger
423-690-3211
Thomas
Holdsworth
513-569-7675
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
Berry Dellinger
John Graham
513-229-2846
Richard Griffith
908-321-6629
Paul McCauley
513-569-7444
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1998
Completed 1991
Completed
Completed 1996
Completed
Completed
Completed 1998
Completed 1998
Completed 2003
Completed 1994
Completed 1992
Completed 1997
B-15
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Ohio (continued)
U.S. EPANRMRLand
ETG Environmental
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA Risk
Reduction Engineering
Laboratory and IT
Corporation
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA Risk
Reduction Engineering
Laboratory and FRX,
Inc.
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
U.S. EPA
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Base-Catalyzed
Dechlorination Process
Debris Washing System
Hydraulic Fracturing
Alternate Cover Assessment
Program (ACAP)
Base Catalyzed
Decomposition
George Huffman
513-569-7341
Yei-Shong Shieh
215-832-0700
Michael Taylor
513-782-4700
William Slack
513-469-6040
Steve Rock
513-569-7149
Terry Lyons
513-569-7589
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Completed 1990
Completed 1992
Completed 2001
Completed 2004
Oklahoma
Geo-Microbial
Technologies, Ochelata,
OK
Technology for Metals
Release and Removal from
Wastes
Donald Hitzman
918-535-2281
Emerging Technology
Completed 2001
Oregon
Metorex, Inc.
Bend, OR
Field Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence (FPXRF)
Jim Pasmore
800-229-9209
541-385-6748
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Completed 1995
Pennsylvania
Aluminum Company of
America (formerly Alcoa
Separations Technology,
Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Calgon Carbon
Oxidation Technologies
(formerly Peroxidation
Systems, Inc.)
Pittsburgh, PA
Center for Hazardous
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Center for Hazardous
Materials Research
Pittsburgh, PA
Bioscrubber
Perox-Pur Chemical
Oxidation
Acid Extraction Treatment
System
Organics Destruction and
Metals Stabilization
Paul Liu
412-826-3711
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
B Stephe Paff
412-826-5321
Brian Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Completed 1993
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
B-16
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Pennsylvania (continued)
Concurrent Technologies
(formerly Center for
Hazardous Materials
Research)
Pittsburgh, PA
MacTec-SPB
Technologies Company
Pittsburgh, PA
Geo-Con, Inc.
Monroeville, PA
2 Demonstrations
Horsehead Resource
Development Co. Inc.
Monaca, PA
Lewis Environmental
Services, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Strategic Diagnostics,
Inc.
Newtown, PA
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
Pitsburgh, PA
R.E. Wright
Middletown, PA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Vortec Corp
Collegeville, PA
Lead Smelting
In Well Vapor Stripping of
Ground Water
In-situ Solidification/
Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Soil Leaching Process
Immunoassay for PCP
Slurry Biodegradation
Bioventing, Air Sparging,
Biological Treatment for
Ground Water (multi-
developer project with state
of New York)
Thermal Desorption
Steam Regeneration
Adsorption System
(Ambersorb)
Oxidation and Vitrification
Process
Brian Bosilovich
412-826-5321
Mark McGlathery
800-444-6221
Linda Ward
Robert Hayden
412-856-7700
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810
Tom Lewis III
412-322-8100
Craig Kostyshyn
215-860-5115
ext. 634
David Nakles
412-826-3340
Richard Cronce
717-944-5501
Mike Cosmos
215-430-7423
John
Thoroughgood
610-701-3728
Deborah Plantz
215-537-4061
James Hnat
610-489-2255
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Completed 1999
Completed 1988
Completed
Exited
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Exited
South Carolina
E&C Williams
Summerville, SC
University of South
Carolina
Columbia, SC
Chemical Stabilization of
Mercury Mining Wastes
In-situ Mitigation of Acid
Water
Charlie Williams
843-821-4200
Frank Caruccio
803-777-4512
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Completed 2001
Completed 1995
B-17
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Tennessee
Bergmann USA
Gallatin, TN
Brown and Root
Environmental/
Illinois Institute of
Technology
Oak Ridge, TN
IT Corporation
Knoxville, TN
IT Corporation
Knoxville, TN
WASTECH, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Soil and Sediment Washing
Technology
Radio Frequency Heating
Batch Steam Distillation and
Metal Extraction
Eimco Biolift Slurry Reactor
as developed by Tekno
Associates
Mixed Waste Treatment
Process
Photocalytic and Biological
Soil Detoxificaiton
Solidification/ Stabilization
George Jones
615-230-2217
Clifton Blanchard
423-483-9900
Stuart Shealy
423-690-3211
Kandi Brown
423-690-3211
Ed Alperin
615-690-3211
Duane Graves
423-690-3211
Terrence Lyons
U.S. EPA
513-569-7859
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed 1994
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Geokinetics and Duke
Engineering
EET, Inc.
Bellaire, TX
ENSR Consulting
Engineering and Larson
Engineering
Houston, TX
Filter Flow Technology,
Inc.
League City, TX
Fugro Geosciences, Inc.
Houston, TX
Hanby Environmental
Laboratory Wimberly,
TX
Hrubetz Environmental
Services, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Rigaku, Inc.
Woodlands, TX
Electrokinetic Flushing &
Surfactant Flushing
PCB/Metals Extraction from
Porous Surfaces
Bioventing, Air Sparging,
Biological Treatment for
Ground Water (multi-
developer project with the
State of New York)
Colloid Polishing Method
Laser Fluorescence PAH,
BTEX Screening Cone
Penetrometer
PCP Test Kit
HRUBOUT Process
XRF Analyzer
Harry Linnemeyer
512-425-2000
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Tim Tarrillion
713-662-0727
David Ramsden
(ENSR)
713-520-6802
N. Sathi-yakumar
716-272-7310
Todd Johnson
713-334-6080
Andrew Taer
713-778-5580
John Hanby
512-847-1212
Barbara Hrubetz
Michael Hrubetz
214-363-7833
John Martin
281-363-1033
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Completed 1999
Completed 1997
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1996
Completed 1993
Completed 1993
Ongoing
B-18
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Texas (continued)
Solidtech, Inc.
Houston, TX
Star Organics
Dallas, TX
TN Spectrace
Round Rock, TX
Micro-Bac International,
Inc.
University of Houston
Houston, TX
Western Product
Recovery Group, Inc.
Houston, TX
^^^^B
^^^"
Phytokinetics, Inc.
North Logan, UT
Solidification and
Stabilization
Injection Soil Amendment
(Stabilization)
Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometer
Microbial Degradation of
PCBs
Concentrated Salt Extraction
of Lead
CCBA Physical and
Chemical Treatment
^^^^^m
^^^^^^H
Phytoremediation of Soils
Bill Stall-worth
713-497-8558
Phil Clarke
214-522-0742
Peter Barry
512-388-9100
Todd Kenney
512-310-9000
Dennis Clifford
713-743-4266
Donald Kelly
713-493-9321
Bert Elkins
619-749-8856
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
^^^^M
^^^^^^H
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1988
Completed 1999
Completed 1995
Completed 2002
Completed 1999
Completed 1994
^^H
Completed 1999
Completed 1999
Vermont
Green Mountain
Laboratories
Biodegradation of PCBs in
Soils
Adam Longee
802-223-1468
Demonstration
Completed 2000
Virginia
BioGenesis Enterprises,
Inc.
Fairfax Station, VA
BioGenesis Enterprises,
Inc.
Springfield, VA
BWX Tech., Inc.
(Affiliate of Babcock
andWilcoxCo.
Lynchburg, VA
Dynaphore, Inc.
Richmond, VA
ITT Industries
Roanoke, VA
Wako Chemicals
Richmond, VA
Soil Washing/
Biological Treatment
Sediment Washing System
Cyclone Furnace
Removal of Dissolved
Heavy Metals via
FORAGER Sponge
Enhanced In-Situ
Bioremediation of
Chlorinated Compounds
Dioxin Elisa Kit
Charles Wilde
703-913-9700
Charles Wilde
703-913-9700
Evan Reynolds
804-522-6000
Norman Rainer
804-288-7109
Rosann
Kryczkowski
540-362-7356
Emmy Leung
877-714-1920
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technology
Completed 1992
Ongoing
Completed 1992
Completed 1991
Completed 1994
Completed 1999
Completed 2004
Washington
ECOVA Corporation
Redmond, WA
Bioslurry Reactor
Alan Jones
206-883-1900
Demonstration
Completed 1991
B-19
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Washington (continued)
Geosafe Corporation
Richland, WA
Ionics/ Resources
Conservation Co.
Bellevue, WA
Keeco
PortofRidgefield
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
(ReTec) Seattle, WA
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
(ReTec) Seattle, WA
Scitec Corporation
Richland, WA
University of
Washington
Seattle, WA
Wilder Construction
In- situ Vitrification
BEST Solvent Extraction
Chemical Stabilization of
Mercury Mining Wastes
Steam Enhanced
Remediation
Methanotrophic Biofilm
Reactor
Liquid and Soils Biological
Treatment
Field Portable X-Ray
Fluorescence
Asdorptive Filtration
Matcon Modified Asphalt
Cap
James Hansen
Matthew Haass
509-375-0710
William Hines
206-828-2400
Amy Anderson
888-977-9156
Brent Grening
360-887-3873
Hans Stroo
206-624-9349
Merv Cooper
206-624-9349
Steve Santy
800-466-5323
509-783-9850
Mark Benjamin
206-543-7645
W. Randall Garrett
800-484-9404
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Completed 1992
Completed 2001
Ongoing
Completed 1995
Completed 1994
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 2001
Wisconsin
Minergy
Svedala Industries
(formerly Allis Mineral
Systems)
Oak Creek, WI
US EPA/ NRMRL US-
DA Forest Products Lab
Madison
University of Wisconsin,
Madison, WI
Thermal Sediment Reuse
Technology
Pyrokiln Thermal
Encapsulation Process
Fungus Treatment
Technology
Photoelectro-catalytic
Treatment of Metals and
Organics in Water
Terry Carroll 920-
727-1411
Jim Kidd
414-798-6341
Glenn Heian
414-762-1190
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Marc Anderson
608-262-2674
Charles Hill, Jr.
608-263-4593
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Completed 2001
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
Completed
Wyoming
Western Research
Institute
Laramie, WY
Contained Recovery of Oily
Wastes (CROW)
James Speight
307-721-2011
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Completed 1991
Completed 1997
B-20
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Canada
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited Chalk
River, Ontario
Atomic Energy of
Canada, Limited Chalk
River, Ontario
Cone Tech
Investigations
Vancouver, British
Colombia
ELI Ecologic
International, Inc.
Rockwood, Ontario
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
EnviroMetal
Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
2 Demonstrations
Geosyntec
Guelph, Ontario
Grace Dearborn, Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario
Matrix Photocatalytic
Limited (formerly
Nutech Environmental)
London, Ontario, Canada
Matrix Photocatalytic
Limited
Toronto Harbour
Comission
Toronto, Ontario
Wastewater Technology
Centre
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Zenon Environmental
Systems, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario
Ultrasonic-Acid Leachate
Treatment for Mixed Wastes
Chemical Treatment and
Ultrafiltration
Resistivity, pH, Seismic,
Temperature, Cone
Penetrometer
Thermal Gas Phase
Reduction Process and
Thermal Desorption
In Situ Reactive Barrier
Metal Enhanced Abiotic
Degradation
Emulsified Zero-valent Iron
for DNAPL Remediation
Daramend Process
TiO2 Photocatalytic
Treatment of Aqueous
Waste Streams
TiO2 Photocatalytic Air
Treatment
Soil Recycling
Cross-Flow Pervaporation
System
Bioreactor Integrated with
an Ultrafiltration Membrane
System
Cross-Flow Pervaporation
System
ZenoGem Process
Shiv Vijayan
613-583-3311
ext. 3220/6057
Leo Buckley
613-584-3311
Ward Phillips
604-327-4311
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
John Vogan
519-824-0432
William
Matulewicz
609-722-6700
Suzanne O'Hara
519-822-2230
Alan Seech
Paul Bucen
905-272-7480
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Bob Henderson
519-660-8669
Dennis Lang
416-863-2047
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Lisa Ashton
905-639-6320
ext. 244
Phil Canning
Tony Tonelli
905-639-6320
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Emerging Technology
Emerging Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ex- situ
In- situ
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Emerging Technology
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed
Completed 1993
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 2000
Completed 1995
Completed
Completed 2003
Completed 1994
Completed 1994
Completed 1995
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
Completed 1995
Completed 1995
B-21
-------
SITE PROJECTS - BY DEVELOPER STATE
Developer
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
England/United Kingdom
AEA Technology
(formerly Warren Spring
Laboratory)
Oxfordshire, England
Graseby Ionics, Limited
Waterford Herts,
England
^^^^H
^^^^^H
Gruppo Italimpresse
(developed by Shirco
Infrared Systems, Inc.)
(formerly ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
2 Demonstrations
Physical and Chemical
Treatment
Ion Mobility Spectrometry
^^^^^m
^^^^^^H
Infrared Thermal
Destruction
Steve Barber
011-44-1235-
463062
John Brokenshire
011-44-1923-
816166
Martin Cohen
561-683-0507
^^^^ren^^^^^^^^^^^H
^^^^^^^^^m
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
Emerging Technology
Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies
^^^^M
^^^^^^H
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Completed 1990
^^M
^^^H
Completed 1987
Puerto Rico
Terra Vac, Inc.
San Juan, PR
In- situ Vacuum Extraction
James Malot
787-725-8750
Demonstration
Completed
B-22
-------
Appendix C
SITE TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES
(Alphabetically by Demonstration Site State)
c-i
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Fairbanks, AK
ABE
Superfund Site
(Region 10)
Soil Washing
Brice Environmental Services
Corporation
(BESCORP)
Fairbanks, AK
Craig Jones
907-452-2515
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Arizona
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Pesticide Site
(Region 9)
Phoenix, AZ
Williams AFB
(Region 9)
Low Temperature
Thermal Aeration
Anaerobic Thermal
Processor
In-situ Subsurface
Bioremediation
Smith Environmental Services
(formerly Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Smith Environmental Services
(formerly Canonie)
Englewood, CO
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
Bio-Rem
Butler, IN
David O. Mann
219-868-5823
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed
Completed 1993
Arkansas
Jefferson, AR
Incineration Research
Facility (IRF)
(Region 6)
Tunable-Pulse
Combustion
Pyreton Burner
(Thermal
Destruction)
Sonotech, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
BenZinn
404-894-3033
American Combustion
Technologies
Norcross, GA
Gregory Gitman
404-564-4180
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1995
Completed 1988
California
Burbank, CA
Lockheed Site
(Region 9)
Clear Lake, CA
Clear Lake, CA
Integrated In-situ
Vapor Extraction
and Steam Vacuum
Stripping Process
Biostabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
Radian Corporation (formerly
AWD Technologies, Inc.)
Walnut Creek, CA
David Bluestein
415-227-0822
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
Sevenson, W.C.
Munster, IN
Steve Chisick
219-836-0116
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1990
Completed
Exited
C-2
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
California (continued)
Program
Status
Clear Lake, CA
Edwards AFB, CA
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fresno, CA
Selma Site
(Region 9)
Fullerton, CA
McColl Superfund Site
(Region 9)
Huntington Beach, CA
Rainbow Disposal
(Region 9)
Jackson, CA
Pintail Systems, Inc.
(Region 9)
Leviathan Mine Site
(Region 9)
Leviathan Mine Site
(Region 9)
Leviathan Mine Site
(Region 9)
Livermore, CA
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
(LLNL)
(Region 9)
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Wastes
CAV-OX Oxidation
Process
Entrained-Bed
Gasfication
Silicate Compounds
by Solidification/
Stabilization!
Excavation and
Foam Suppression
of Volatiles
Steam Injection/
Vacuum Extraction
(SIVE)
Biological
Stabilization of
Arsenic in Soils
Biphasic Lime
Treatment
Passive Constructed
Wetlands
Lime Lagoons
Chemical Oxidation
Perox-Pure
E&C Williams
Summerville, SC
Charlie Williams
84-821-4200
Magnum Water Technology
El Segundo, CA
Dale Cox
310-640-7000
Texaco, Inc.
S. El Monte, CA
John Winter
310-908-7387
STC Omega (formerly Silicate
Technology Corporation)
Scottsdale, AZ
Steve Pegler
602-948-7100
U.S. EPA
Region 9
San Francisco, CA
Jon Blevins
415-744-2400
Hughes Environmental
Manhattan Beach, CA
(No longer a vendor for SIVE)
Paul De Percin
U.S. EPA
513-569-7797
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
State of CA
Chris Stetler
530-542-5461
University of NV, Reno
Tim Tsukamoto
775-784-4413
ARCO
Barry Duff
406-563-5211
Calgon Carbon Oxidation
Technologies (formerly
Peroxidation Systems, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Bertrand Dussert
412-787-6681
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 2001
Completed 1993
Completed 1994
Completed 1990
Completed 1990
Completed 1993
Completed 2000
Completed 2004
Ongoing
Completed 2004
Completed 1995
C-3
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
California (continued)
Program
Status
Livermore, CA
LLNL
(Region 9)
March AFB, CA
(Region 9)
Port Hueneme, CA
Naval Facilities
Engineering Service
Center
(Region 9)
Redding, CA
Iron Mountain
Superfund Site
Sacramento, CA
McClellanAFB
(Region 9)
Sacramento, CA
McClellanAFB
(Region 9)
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Naval Air Station
North Island (NASNI)
(Region 9)
San Diego, CA
NASNI Site 9
(Region 9)
San Francisco, CA
Westin Hotel
(Region 9)
In-situ Enhanced
Extraction
In well Air
Stripping
Solvated Electron
Treatment of
Chlorinated
Organics
Precipitation,
Micro filtration,
Sludge Dewatering
Photolytic
Destruction for
SVE Off-gases
Groundwater
Extraction
Circulating Bed
Cumbuster
In Well Vapor
Stripping of Ground
Water
Cross-flow
Pervaporation
System for
Removal of VOCs
from Groundwater
GIS/KEY
Software for HW
Site
Data Management
Berkley Environmental
Restoration (formerly Udell
Technologies, Inc.)
Emeryville, CA
Kent Udell
510-653-9477
Roy Weston Woodland Hills, CA
JeffBannon
818-971-4900
Commodore Environmental
Columbus, OH
Neil Dronby
614-297-0365
EPOC Water, Inc.
Fresno, CA
Scott Jackson
209-291-8144
Process Technologies, Inc.
Boise, ID
Michael Swan
208-385-0900
Xerox Two Phase Extraction
Webster, NY
Ron Hess
716-422-3694
General Atomics (formerlt Ogden
Environmental Services)
San Diego, CA
Robert Goforth
619-455-2499
MACTEC Environmental, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA
Mark McGlathery
800-444-6221
Zenon Environmental, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Phil Canning
905-639-6320
GIS Solutions, Inc.
Concord, CA
Garry Reid
510-827-5400
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Completed 1994
Completed 1996
Completed 1993
Exited
Completed 1995
Completed 1989
Completed 1999
Completed 1995
Completed 1993
C-4
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
California (continued)
Program
Status
San Jose, CA
Lorentz Barrel and
Drum Site
(Region 9)
San Pedro, CA
Annex Terminal
(Region 9)
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Marie Health
Care Services (UST
Site)
(Region 9)
South El Monte, CA
(Region 9)
Ultraviolet Ozone
Treatment for
Liquids
In-situ Steam/
Air Stripping
Soil Washing/
Geological
Treatment
Gasification
Process
US Filter (formerly Ultrox
International, Inc)
Santa Ana, CA
John Lowry
412-772-1247
Novaterra, Inc.
(formerly Toxic Treatment, Inc.)
Torrance, CA
Phil La Mori
310-328-9433
BioGenesis Enterprises (formerly
BioVersal USA)
Fairfax Station, VA
Charles Wilde
703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiran
708-827-0024
Texaco Syngas, Inc.
White Plains, NY
John Winter
316-251-4000 ext. 536
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed
Completed 1989
Completed 1992
Completed 1994
Colorado
Clear Creek, CO
Burleigh Tunnel
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
Rocky Flats
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
DOE Rocky Flats
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Wetland-Based
Treatment for
Mineral Mine
Drainage
Colloid Polishing
Method
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Dual Tube Liner
Soil Sampler
Electrocoa-gulation
EMFLUX Soil Gas
Survey System
Colorado Department of Health
Denver, CO
Jim Lewis
303-692-3390
Filter Flow Technology League
City, TX
Tod Johnson
713-334-6080
Simulprobe Technologies, Inc.
CA
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Art's Manufacturing and Supply
American Falls, ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
General Environmental Inc.
(formerly Hydrologies, Inc.)
Englewood, CO
Carl Dalrymple
303-761-6960
Quadrel Services, Inc.
MD
Bruce Tucker
Paul Henning
301-874-5510
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Completed 1999
Completed 1992
Completed
Completed
Completed 1995
Completed
C-5
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Colorado (continued)
Program
Status
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Denver, CO
(Region 8)
Rocky Flats, CO
(Region 8)
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO
(Region 8)
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO
(Region 8)
Summitville, CO
(Region 8)
Gore-Scrubber
Passive Soil Gas
Sampler
JMC
Environmentalist's
Subsoil Probe
Large Bore Soil
Sampler
In-situ Reactive
Barrier
Biological
Treatment, HRC of
Organics
In-Situ Thermal
Multiple Innovative
Passive mine
Drainage
Technologies
W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc.
Elkton, MD
Ray Fenstermacher
410-392-7600
Clements Associates, Inc.
IA
Jim Clements
515-792-8285
Geoprobe Systems
Salina, KS
Wesley McCall
Tom Omli
800-436-7762
EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
John Vogan
519-824-0432
Regenesis CA Stephen
Koenigsberg
949-366-8000
Terra-Therm LLC Ralph Baker
978-343-0300
Region 8 and Sate of CO
Victor Kettellapper
303-312-6578
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed 2000
Completed 2002
Completed 2002
Completed 2001
Connecticut
Roosevelt Mills
Vernon, CT
Permanganate/
Persulfate
Oxidation
Treatment for PCE
Univ. of Connecticut
George Hoag
860-486-2781
Demonstration
Ongoing
Delaware
Dover, DE
(Region 3) &
Elgin, IL
(Region 5)
Matcon Modified
Asphalt Cap
Wilder Construction
Co., WA
W. Randall Garrett
800-484-9404
Demonstration
Completed 2001
District of Columbia
Anacosria River
Washington, D.C.
(Region 3)
Innovative Capping
Design
Remediation Technology
Development Forum, HSRL
Demonstration
Ongoing
C-6
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Brandon, FL
Peak Oil Superfund
Site
(Region 4)
Cape Canaveral, FL
(Region 4)
Cape Canaveral, FL
(Region 4)
Hialeah, FL
General Electric
Service Shop
Kennedy Space
Center, FL (Region 4)
Kennedy Space
Center, FL (Region 4)
Kennedy Space
Center, FL (Region 4)
Kennedy Space
Center, FL (Region 4)
Kennedy Space
Center, FL (Region 4)
Kennedy Space
Center, FL (Region 4)
Pensacola, FL
American Creosote
Works
(Region 4)
Infrared Incinerator
Dynamic
Underground
Stripping of TCE
Emulsified Zero-
valent Iron for
DNAPL
Remediation
In-situ
Solidification/
Stabilization
XRF Analyzer
XRF Analyzer
XRF Analyzer
XRF Analyzer
XRF Analyzer
XRF Analyzer
Filtration
Grupo Italimprese
(Ecova Europa)
(formerly ECOVA)
Rome, Italy
John Cioffi
206-883-1900
Integrated Water Resources, Inc.
805-565-0996
Geosyntec
Guelph, Ontario
Suzanne O'Hara
519-822-2230
Geo-Con, Inc.
Monroville, PA
Linda Ward
Robert Hay den
412-856-7700
Innov-X Systems, Inc.
Woburn, MA
Rose Koch
781-938-5005
Niton Corp.
Billerica, MA
Debbie Schatzlein
Oxford Instruments Analytical
Chicago, IL
Ruhre Gehrlein
Rigaku, Inc.
Woodlands, TX
John Martin
281-363-1033
Rontec USA, Inc.
Carlisle, MA
Paul Smith
978-266-2900
Xcalibur XRF Services, Inc.
Islandia, NY 631-435-9749
SBP Technologies, Inc.
Baton Rouge, LA
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Completed 1987
Completed 2002
Completed 2003
Completed 1988
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed 1992
C-7
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Florida (continued)
Pensacola, FL
Escanbia Wood
Preserving Site
(Region 4)
Petroleum Products
Corporation
Miami, FL
Soil Washing
Oleofilter
U.S. EPA Mobile Volume
Reduction Unit
Cincinnati, OH
Richard Griffith
908-321-6629
North American Technologies
Aprotek
San Ramon, CA
Cathryn Wmberly
916-366-6185
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed
Georgia
Chickamuga, GA and
Hopkinsville, GA
(Region 4)
Warner Robins, GA
Robins AFB
(Region 4)
Debris Washing
System
Stabilization of
Organics
U.S. EPANRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Mike Taylor
512-782-4700
WASTECH, Inc.
Oak Ridge, TN
Benjamin Peacock
615-483-6515
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1990
Completed 1991
Hawaii
Ford Island, HI
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)
Pearl Harbor, HI
Naval Facility
(Region 9)
In-Situ Hydrogen-
Enhanced
Remediation
PCB/Metals
Extraction from
Porous Surfaces
Electrokinetics
Electrokinetic
Flushing &
Surfactant Flushing
Set Process for
PCBs in Soil
Closed Loop Lead
Recovery
Limno-Tech, Inc.
Ann Arbor, MI
John Wolfe
734-332-1200
EET Inc.
Bellaire, TX
Tim Tarrillion
713-662-0727
Geokinetics
CA
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Geokinetics and Duke
Engineering
TX
Steven Clark
510-704-2940
Harry Linnemeyer
512-425-2000
Commodore Advanced Sciences,
Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Mark Jones
505-872-6803
Geokinetics CA Stephen Clark
510-704-2940
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ongoing
Completed 1997
Completed 2000
Completed 1999
Completed 2000
Completed 2002
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Pearl Harbor, HI
(Region 9)
Microbial Cell
Technology
Hawaii (continued)
University of Hawaii
Honolulu, HI
Dr. Ping-Yi Yang
S-956-8459
Demonstration
Ongoing
Aberjona River
INEEL Lab
Sediment Core
Sampler
Phytoremediation
Aquatic Research
ID
Will Young
(208) 768-2222
Argonne National Laboratory
West Idaho Fall, ID
Scott Lee
(208) 533-7829
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Completed
Completed 2003
Illinois
Chicago, IL
(Region 4)
Elgin, IL
(Region 5) &
Dover, DE
(Region 3)
Waukegan Harbor, IL
(Region 5)
Hydraulic
Fracturing
Matcon Modified
Asphalt Cap
Thermal Desorption
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
William Slack
513-469-6040
Wilder Construction Co., WA
W. Randall Garrett
800-484-9404
SoilTech, ATP Systems Inc.
Porter, IN
Joe Hutton 2 19-926-8651
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed 2001
Completed 1992
Indiana
Gary, IN
Indiana Harbour
(Region 5)
Solvent Extraction
Ionics/Resources Conservation,
Co.
Bellevue, WA
Bill Hines
206-828-2400
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Albert City, IA
(Region 7)
Core Barrel Soil
Sampler
Dual Tube Liner
Soil Sampler
Simulprobe Technologies, Inc.
CA
Richard Laton
415-883-8787
Art's Manufacturing and Supply
American Falls, ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Completed
Completed
C-9
-------
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Loring AFB
Caribou, ME
(Region I)
In-situ Thermal
(Steam Injection)
Steam Tech Environmental
Services
Bakersfield, CA
Hank Sowers
661-322-6478
Demonstration
Completed 2003
Massachusetts
Boston, MA
(Region 1)
Boston, MA
(Region 1)
Grafton, MA
(Region 1)
Groveland, MA
Groveland Wells
Superfund Site
New Bedford, MA
(Region 1 )
New Bedford, MA
(Region 1)
North Dartsmouth,
MA
Resolve Superfund
Site
(Region 1)
AMS Split Core
Sampler
Russian Peat Borer
Anerobic-aerotic
Bioremediation
In-situ Vacuum
Extraction
Batch Organics
Extraction Unit
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Art's Manufacturing and Supply
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Aquatic Research Instruments ID
Will Young
208-768-2222
Harding-Lawson Engineers, MA
Willard Murray
781-245-6606
Terra Vac, Inc.
San Juan, PR
James Malot
787-725-8750
CF Systems Corporation Arvada,
CO
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
CF Systems Corporation Arvada,
CO
L.V. Benningfield
303-420-1550
OHM Environmental (formerly
Chemical Waste Management
Inc.)
Lombarda, IL
Dick Ay en
803-846-2413
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1999
Completed
Completed 2003
Completed
Completed
Completed 1988
Completed 1992
Michigan
Adrian, MI
Anderson
Development
(Region 5)
Bay City, MI
Bay City Municipal
Landfill
(Region 5)
Thermal Desorption
(physical)
Thermal Gas Phase
Reduction Process
and Thermal
Desorption
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
West Chester, PA
Michael Cosmos
215-430-7423
ELI Eco Logic International, Inc.
Rockwood, Ontario,
Canada
Jim Nash
519-856-9591
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed 1992
C-ll
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Michigan (continued)
Program
Status
Buchanan, MI
Electro- Voice
(Region 5)
Detroit, MI
(Region 5)
Essexville, MI
Saginaw Bay
Confined Disposal
Facility
(Region 5)
Grand Ledge, MI
Parsons Chemical Site
(Region 5)
Rose Township, MI
(Region 5)
Saginaw, MI
(Region 5)
Saginaw, MI
(Region 5)
Saginaw, MI
(Region 5)
Saginaw, MI
(Region 5)
Saginaw, MI
(Region 5)
St. Joseph, MI
Subsurface
Volatilization and
Ventilation System
(SVVS)
Debris Washing
System
Sediment Soil
Washing
In-situ Vitrification
Infrared Incinerator
Immunoassay and
Colorimetry for
Dioxin
Cell Based
Immunoassay for
Dioxin
DFI Immunoassay
for Dioxin
Dioxin Elisa Kit
Immunoassay and
Colorimetry for
Dioxin
Submerged Aerobic
Fixed Film Reactor
Billings & Associates, Inc.
Albuquerque, NM
Gale Billings
505-345-1116
U.S. EPA/NRMRL
Cincinnati, Ohio
Donald Sanning
513-569-7444
Bergmann, USA
Gallatin, TN
George Jones
615-230-2217
Geosafe Corporation
Richland, WA
James Hansen
509-375-0710
Grupo Italimprese
(Ecova Europa)
(formerly ECOVA)
Jon Cioffi
206-883-1900
Strategic Diagnostics
Bob Ferguson
800-544-8881
Xenobiotics
Jeff Sturkey
919-688-4804
Cape Technologies
Bob Harrison
207-741-2995
Emmy Leung
877-714-1920
Hybrizyme
Randy Allen
919-783-9595
Allied Signal Corporation
Des Plains, IL
Steve Lupton
708-391-3500
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Completed 1990
Completed 1992
Completed 1994
Completed 1987
Completed 2004
Completed 2004
Completed 2004
Completed 2004
Completed 2004
Completed
Minnesota
McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)
Biotreatment of
Groundwater
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
Demonstration
Completed 1989
C-12
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Minnesota (continued)
Program
Status
McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)
McGillis & Gibbs
Superfund Site
New Bridge, MN
(Region 5)
Minneapolis, MN
Private Oil Refining
Company
(Region 5)
New Brighton, MN
Twin Cities Army
Ammunition Plant
(TCAAP)
(Region 5)
St. Louis Park, MN
(Region 5)
Soil Washing
Biological Aqueous
Treatment System
Soil Washing/
Biological
Treatment
Removal of Lead
from Soils
Bioventing
(air-injection)
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioTrol, Inc.
Eden Prairie, MN
Dennis Chilcote
612-942-8032
BioGenesis Enterprises, Inc.
(formerly BioVersal USA)
Fairfax Station, VA
Charles Wilde 703-250-3442
Mohsen Amiran
708-827-0024
COGNIS TARRAMET
Goss, MO
Lou Magdits
573-626-3476
U.S. EPA/NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
Paul McCauley
513-569-7444
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1989
Completed 1989
Completed 1992
Completed 1994
Completed 1997
Mississippi
Brookhaven, MS
Brookhaven Wood
Preserving
(Region 4)
Fungus Treatment
Technology
U.S. EPA/NRMRL
USDA-Forest Products Lab
Madison, WI
Richard Lamar
608-231-9469
Demonstration
Completed 1991
Montana
Butte, MT
Butte-Silverbow Site
(Region 8)
Butte, MT
(Region 8)
Mike Horse Mine, MT
(Region 8)
Plasma Heat
Chemical
Stabilization of
Mercury Mining
Waste
Grouting Technique
Retech, Inc.
Ukiah, CA
R.C. Eschenback
707-462-6522
E&C Williams, SC
Charlie Williams 843-821-4200
and
Keeco, WA
Amy Anderson
888-977-9156
Morrison Knudsen Corporation
Boise, ID
Kathryn Levihn
Rick Raymondi
208-386-6115
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1991
Completed 2001
Completed 1996
C-13
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Montana (continued)
St. Louis, MT
Welldon Spring
(Region 7)
Anaerobic
Biological
Destruction of TNT
in Soil
J.R. Simplot Company
Pocatello, ID
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Nebraska
Hastings, NE
(Region 7)
Spray Irrigation
University of Nebraska-
Lincoln Hasting, NE
Ray Spalding
402-783-3931
Demonstration
Completed 1996
Nevada
Battle Mountain, NV
(Region 9)
Biodegradation of
Cyanide
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Caren Caldwell
303-367-8443
Demonstration
Completed 1998
New Hampshire
Hudson, NH
(Region 1 )
Milford, NH
Savage Superfund Site
(Region 1 )
Plaistow, NH
(Region 1 )
In-Situ Chemical
Oxidation
Surfactant Enanced
Aquifer
Remediation
Biodegradation of
PCB' sin Soils
Ken Sperry
484-224-3031
U.S. DOE. Duke Engineering
G. Michael Shook
208-526-6945
Green Mountain Laboratories
Montpelier, VT
Adam Longee
802-223-1468
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ongoing
Completed 1999
Completed 2000
New Jersey
Bayonne, NJ
(Region 2)
Edison, NJ
EPA
(Region 2)
Hillsborough, NJ
(Region 2)
Millville, NJ
Nascoilte Site
(Region 2)
Thermal Sediment
Reuse Technology
Solvent Extraction
Carver-
Greenfield Process
Pneumatic
Fracturing,
Extraction and Hot
Gas Injection
Bioreactor
Integrated with an
Ultrafiltration
Membrane System
GTI
Des Plaines, IL
Anil Goyal
847-768-0605
Dehydro Tech Corporation
East Hanover, NJ
Theodore Trowbridge
908-904-1606
Accutech, Inc.
Keyport NJ & New Jersey
Institute of Technology, Newark,
NJ
John Liskowitz
908-739-6444
Zenon Environmental, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Lisa Ashton
905-639-6320 ext. 244
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Ongoing
Completed 1991
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
C-14
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
New Jersey (continued)
Millville, NJ
Nascoilte Site
(Region 2)
Morganville, NJ
Imperial Oil Co., Inc.
Site
(Region 3)
New Jersey (Region 2)
and Venice, Italy
Pedricktown, NJ
National Lead
Industries
(Region 2)
Trenton, NJ
(Region 2)
Wayne, NJ
(Region 2)
ZenoGem Process
Solidification
Sediment Washing
System
Removal of
Dissolved Metals
Phytoextraction of
Metal from Soil
Ex- situ Metal-
enhanced Abiotic
Degredation
Zenon Environmental, Inc.
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Chris Lipski
905-639-6320
Solidtech, Inc.
Houston, TX
Bill Stallworth
713-497-8558
Biogenesis Enterprises, Inc.
Charles Wilde
703-913-9700
Dynaphore/
Forager Sponge
Richmond, VA
Norman Rainer
804-288-7109
Phytotech, Inc.
Monmouth, NJ
Burt Ensley
908-438-0900
EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
William Matulewicz
609-722-6700
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed
Completed 1988
Ongoing
Completed 1994
Completed 1998
Completed 1995
New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM
(Region 6)
Electrokenitic
Extraction in
Unsaturated Soils
Sandia National Laboratories,
Albuquerque, NM
Eric Lindgren
505-844-3820
Demonstration
Completed 1999
New York
Brant, NY
Wide Beach
(Region 2)
Brockport, NY
Sweden- 3 Chapman
Site
(Region 2)
Thermal Desorption
Dechlorination
Biovault,
Bioventing
and Groundwater
Circulation
Biological
Treatment Process
(multi-developer
project)
SoilTech, ATP Systems, Inc.
Porter, IN
Joe Hutton
219-926-8651
NY State Bioremediation and
SBP Technologies, Inc.
White Plains, NY
Clayton Page
504-755-7711
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Completed 1995
C-15
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
New York (continued)
Niagara Falls, NY
(Region 2)
Upstate NY
(Region 2)
Utica, NY
(Region 2)
Utica, NY
Town Gas Site
(Region 2)
Cold Top
Vitrification
In-situ Metal-
enhanced Abiotic
Degredation
High Temperature
Thermal Processor
Slurry
Biodegradation
New Jersey Institute of
Technology (NJIT)
Newark, NJ and Geo Tech
Development Corporation, King
of Prussia, PA
William Librizzi
201-596-5846
Thomas Tate
610-337-8515
EnviroMetal Technologies, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario
John Vogan
519-824-0432
Maxymillian Technologies, Inc.
(Formerly Clean Berkshires)
Lanesboro, MA
Jim Maxymillian
413-499-3050
Remediation Technologies Inc.
(ReTec) (formerly Mo Tec Inc.)
Pitsburgh, PA
David Nakles
412-826-3340
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Exited
Completed
Completed 1993
Completed 1991
North Carolina
Morrisville, NC
Koppers Site
(Region 4)
Warrenton, NC
(Region 4)
Base-Catalyzed
Destruction
(Dehalogenation)
Base Catalyzed
Decomposition
U.S. EPA/NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH George Huffman
513-569-7341
Environmental Inc.
Blue Bell, PA
Yei-Shong Shieh
215-832-0700
U.S. EPA
NRMRL, Cincinnati, OH
Terry Lyons
513-569-7589
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1993
Completed 2004
Aliance, OH
Babcock & Wilcox
Alliance Research
Center
(Region 5)
Cincinnati, OH
EPA T&E Facility
(Region 5)
Cyclone
Vitrification
Bioslurry Reactor
Babcock & Wilcox Alliance
Research Center
Alliance, OH
Lawrence King
216-829-7576
ECOVA Corporation
Redmond, WA
Alan Jones
206-883-1900
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1991
Completed 1991
C-16
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Crooksville, OH
Pintail Systems, Inc.
(Region 5)
Dayton, OH
(Region 5)
DOE Fernald Facility,
OH
(Region 5)
Roseville/ Crooksville,
OH
Roseville/ Crooksville,
OH
Bio stabilization of
Lead
Hydraulic
Fracturing
Solvent Extraction
Envirobond Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Injection Soil
Amendment
(Stabilization)
Pintail Systems, Inc.
Aurora, CO
Leslie Thompson
303-367-8443
U.S. EPA/
NRMRL
Cincinnati, OH
William Slack
513-469-6040
Terra Kleen Corporation (name
changed back from Sevenson
Extraction Technology, Inc.)
Del Mar, CA
Alan Cash
619-558-8762
Rocky Mountain Remedation
Services
Jim Barthel
303-215-6620
Star Organics
Phil Clarke
214-522-0742
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 2000
Completed 1992
Completed 1997
Completed
Completed
Oregon
Clackamas, OR
Portable Equipment
Co. Site
(Region 10)
Chemical Fixation/
Stabilization
Advanced Remediation Mixing,
Inc.
(formerly Chemfix Technologies,
Inc.)
Metarie, LA
Sam Pizzitola
504-461-0466
Demonstration
Completed 1989
Pennsylvania
Douglassville, PA
(Region 3)
Monaca, PA
Palmerton, PA
Palmerton Zinc Pile
(Region 3)
Solidification/
Stabilization
Flame Reactor
Membrane
Micro filtration
Hazcon and Funderburk &
Associates)
Apollo Beach, FL
Ray Funderburk
813-645-9620
Horsehead Resource
Development Co., Inc.
Regis Zagrocki
610-826-8810
E.I. DuPontDeNemours &
Company
Newark, DE
Oberlin Filter Company
Waukesha, WI
Ernest Mayer
302-774-2277
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1987
Completed
Completed 1990
C-17
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Pennsylvania (continued)
Stroudsburg, PA
(Region 3)
Contained
Recovery of Oil
Wastes
Western Research Institute
Laramie, WY
James Speight
307-721-2011
Demonstration
Completed 1997
Rhode Island
Central Landfill,
RI
(Region 1)
N. Smithfield, RI
(Region 1 )
Reverse Osmosis:
Disc-
Tube Module
Technology
AIR II
Photocatalytic
Technology for Air
Streams
ROCHEM Separations, Inc.
Torrence, CA David LaMonica
310-370-3160
KSE, Inc.
Amhurst, MA
James Kittrell
413-549-5506
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Completed 1999
South Carolina
Savannah River Site,
SC
(Region 4)
High Energy
Irradiation for
Destruction of
Organics in
Aqueous Solutions
and Sludge
High Voltage Environmental
Application, Inc.
Florida
and International University
Miami, FL
William Cooper
910-962-3450
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Tennessee
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
DOE Oak Ridge
Facility
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Photocatalytic
Aqueous Phase
Organics
Destruction
Matrix
Freeze Barrier
Thermal
Decomposition
Atomic Absorption
Anodic Stripping
Voltammetry
XRF
Matrix, Inc.
London, ON
Robert Henderson
519-660-8669
Arctic Foundations
Anchorage, AK
Ed Yarmak
907-562-2741
Milestone
Monroe, CT
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
MTI, Inc.
Wilmington, NC
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
Metorex
Ewing, NJ
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
Demonstration
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Completed 1995
Completed 1998
Completed 2003
Completed 2003
Completed 2003
C-18
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Demonstration
Location
Technology
Contact
Program
Status
Tennessee (continued)
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Oak Ridge, TN
(Region 4)
Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy
XRF
Ohio Lumex
Twinsburg, OH
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
Niton Corp.
Billerica, MA
Stephen Billets
U.S. EPA
702-798-2232
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Monitoring and
Measurement
Technologies
Completed 2003
Completed 2003
Fort Worth, TX
Carswell AFB
(Region 6)
Goldthwaite, TX
Lower Colorado River
Authority Electrical
Substation
Goldthwaite, TX
(Region 6)
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
San Antonio, TX
Kelly AFB
(Region 6)
Phytoremediation
ofTCEin
Groundwater
Microbial
Degradation/
Solvant Extraction
Microbial
Degradation of
PCBs
Hot Air Injection
Radio-Frequency
Heating
Radio-Frequency
Heating
ASC/EMR
Wright Patterson AFB
Dayton, Ohio
Greg Harvey
513-255-7716
Envirogen, Inc.
Lawrenceville, NJ
Ronald Unterman
609-936-9300
Micro-BAC Int., TX
512-310-9000
X-19 Biological Products, CA
408-970-9485
Hrubetz Environmental Services,
Inc.
Dallas, TX
Michael or Barbara Hrubetz
214-363-7833
IITRI/NUS
IITRI-Chicago, IL and
Haliburton/NUS
Oak Ridge, TN
Clifford Blanchard
615-483-9900
KAI/HNUS
Oak Ridge, TN
Cliff Blanchard
615-483-9900
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 1998
Completed 2000
Completed 2002
Completed 1993
Completed 1994
Completed 1994
Hill AFB, UT
(Region 8)
Steam Injection/
Vacuum Extraction
Praxis Environmental Services
San Francisco, CA
Dr. Lloyd Steward
415-641-9044
Demonstration
Completed 1997
C-19
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Midvale Slag, UT
Ogden, UT
Chevron Transfer
Facility
Molecular Bonding
System
Phytoremediation
of Petroleum in Soil
and Groundwater
Solucorp
Saddleback, NJ
Robert Kuhn
914-623-2333
Phytokinetics, Inc.
Logan, UT
Ari Ferro
801-750-0985
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed
Completed 1999
Virginia
Roanoke, VA
ITT Night Vision
Facility
(Region 3)
Enhanced In-situ
Bioremediation of
Chlorinated
Compounds
ITT Industries
Roanoke, VA
Rosann Kryczkowski
540-362-7356
Demonstration
Completed 1999
Washington
Ellensburg, WA
(Region 10)
Whatcom Waterway
Bellingham, WA
Ridgefield, WA
(Region 10)
Anaerobic
Biological
Destruction of
Dinoseb in Soil
Electrochemical
Geooxidation
Steam Enhanced
Remediation
J. R. Simplot Company
Pocatello, ID
Tom Yergovich
209-858-2511
Weiss Associates
Joe Lovenitti
Port of Ridgefield
Brent Grening
360-887-3873
Demonstration
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed
July 1993
Completed 2003
Ongoing
Wisconsin
Fox River, WI
(Region 5)
Green Bay, WI
(Region 5)
Green Bay, WI
(Region 5)
Sparta, WI
U.S. DOD
Fort McCoy
(Region 5)
Jones Island CDF
Milwaukee, WI
(Region 5)
Thermal Sediment
Reuse Technology
AMS Split Core
Sampler
Russian Peat Borer
MAECTITE®
Treatment Process
Phytoremediation
Minergy, WI
Terry Carroll
920-727-1411
Art's Manufacturing and Supply
ID
Brian Anderson
800-635-7330
Aquatic Research Instruments
ID
Will Young
208-768-2222
Sevenson Environmental
Services, Inc. Munster, IN
Chuck McPheeters
219-836-0116
Army Corps of Engineers
(Vicksburg, MS and Detroit MI)
Demonstration
Monitoring and
Measurement
Monitoring and
Measurement
Demonstration
Demonstration
Completed 2001
Completed 1999
Completed
Completed 2000
Completed 2003
C-20
-------
TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION SITES - BY SITE STATE
Alternate Cover
Assessment
Program (ACAP)
Toronto, Canada
Toronto Port Industrial
Division
Treatment Train for
Contaminated Soils
Toronto Harbor Commissioners
Toronto, Canada
Dennis Lang 416-863-2047
Demonstration
Completed 1992
Trenton, Ontario
Domtar Wood
Preserving Site
Bioremediation
GRACE Bioremediation
Technologies
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Alan Seech
905-272-7480
Demonstration
Completed 1994
Venice, Italy and
New Jersey
Sediment Washing
System
Biogenesis Enterprises, Inc.
Charles Wilde
703-913-9700
Demonstration
Ongoing
C-21
-------
Appendix D
ELECTRONIC TECHNICAL INFORMATION RESOURCES
D-l
-------
CONTENTS
Section Page
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES C-3
Electronic Information Sources C-3
Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field-Sectors Demonstration Projects in North America,
Second Edition and Database C-3
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN) Home Page C-3
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (Tenth Edition) EPA 542/R-01-004 C-3
EPA Technologies (EPA REACH IT) C-3
Site Remediation Technology Infobase C-3
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies C-4
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 3.0 C-4
TechDirect C-4
Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations C-4
EPA Library Network Program C-4
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR) C-4
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC) C-4
Office of Research and Development (ORD) C-4
Remediation Technologies Development Forum (RTDF) C-5
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program C-5
Interstate Technology Regulatory Cooperative (ITRC)
Technology Innovation Program (TIP) C-5
SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES C-5
Electronic Sources of Information C-5
EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory - Hazardous Waste
Site Characterization (on CD-ROM) (EPA 600-C-96-001) C-5
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix C-6
TechDirect C-6
Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations C-6
Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology (CSCT) C-6
Environmental Technology Verification Program C-6
EPA Library Network Program C-6
Office of Research and Development (ORD) C-6
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration Program C-6
Technology Innovation Program (TIP) C-7
D-2
-------
EPA Sources of Information on
Innovative Remediation and Site Characterization Technologies
Listed below are U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sources of information on Innovative Remediation
and Site Characterization Technologies. Sources of information include: electronic information sources in the form of
databases or Internet sites, as well as programs, partnerships and organizations accessible on the Internet.
REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Information Sources
Innovative Remediation Technologies: Field-Scale
Demonstration Projects in North America Second
Edition Database. The searchable database contains
information about 600 completed innovative technology
field demonstration projects in North America. The
purpose of the database is to consolidate key information
from innovative demonstration projects into a single source
and present that information in a format that enables the
user to easily identify innovative technologies that may be
appropriate to the user's particular site remediation needs.
The database, which is limited to completed demonstration
projects and a small number of full-scale cleanup efforts,
does not include emerging technologies or laboratory-scale
projects. A summary report, EPA 542-BOO/004 of the same
name is available from EPA's National Service Center for
Environmental Publications or accessed free of charge from
the CLU IN Internet site at .
Hazardous Waste Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN)
Home Page. CLU-IN is a streamlined source of
information about innovative remediation and site
characterization technologies for hazardous waste cleanup
professionals. It provides access to information about
programs, organizations, publications, and other tools for
EPA and other Federal and State personnel, consulting
engineers, technology developers and venders, remediation
contractors, researchers, community groups, and individual
citizens. Access to various pools of information is
presented in the form of downloadable publications and
databases. Sources of additional information on the
Internet also are presented through a series of links. CLU-
IN is sponsored by EPA's Technology Innovation Office
(TIO). For additional information about the CLU-IN home
page, call (301) 589-5318. CLU-IN can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status
Report (ASR) Eleventh Edition EPA/542/R-03/009 and
ASR Search System. This report contains information
about remedies selected at contaminated waste sites. The
sites include Superfund remedial and removal sites and
some non-Superfund sites being remediated by the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Department of
Defense (DoD), or under the RCRA corrective action
program. The ASR online site cleanup information system
includes Superfund site-specific data such as remedy
selected, contaminants and media treated, project status,
and site contact. The online database is available at
http://cfpub.epa.gov/asr. If you have questions or
comments about the system, please call EPA's TIP at (703)
603-9904. The report can be ordered or downloaded free of
charge from the CLU-IN Internet site at . To order a copy of the report by phone, call
EPA's National Service Center for Environmental
Publications at (800) 490-9198 or (513) 489-8190.
EPA Remediation and Characterization Innovative
Technologies (EPA REACH IT). EPA REACH IT,
sponsored by EPA's Technology Innovation Program
(TIP), is a system that lets environmental professionals use
the power of the Internet to search, view, download, and
print information about innovative remediation and
characterization technologies. EPA REACH IT provides
information about more than 750 service providers that
offer characterization technologies. EPA REACH IT
combines information from three established EPA
databases, the Vendor Information System fro Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT), the Vendor Field
Analytical and Characterization Technologies System
(Vendor FACTS), and the Innovative Treatment
Technologies (ITT), to give users access to comprehensive
information about treatment and characterization
technologies and their applications. It combines
information submitted by technology service providers
about remediation and characterization technologies with
information from EPA, the U.S. Department of Defense
(DoD), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and state
project managers about sites at which innovative
technologies are being deployed. EPA REACH IT can be
accessed through the Internet at http://www.epareachit.org.
It is best viewed using Netscape Navigator or Microsoft
Internet Explorer, version 4.0 or higher. In 2006 EPA will
replace the online system with simplified, downloadable
database or spreadsheet.
Site Remediation Technology Infobase. The Site
Remediation Technology Infobase was founded by EPA
and prepared for the federal agencies participating in the
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. It provides
information on federal cleanup programs; federal site
remediation technology development assistance programs,
and databases; federal electronic resources for site
remediation; other electronic resources for site remediation
D-3
-------
technology information; a bibliography of selected federal
publications on alternative and innovative site remediation
technologies; technology survey reports; and technology
program contacts for DOD, DOE, and EPA. It can be
accessed through the Internet at:
.
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies. The
Cost and Performance Catalog of Case Studies is a joint
effort of Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable
members to publish case study reports on full- and
demonstration-scale remediation projects. As of May 2001,
member agencies of the Roundtable have completed 274
cost and performance case study reports. The reports
(March 1995-May 2001) can be accessed by the Cost and
Performance Case Studies Search:
.
Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and
Reference Guide, Version 3.0. The Remediation
Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide,
Version 3.0, prepared for federal agencies participating on
the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FRTR),
provides a "yellow pages" of remediation technologies
information. The guide is intended to assist remedial
project managers (RPM) to screen and evaluate candidate
cleanup technologies and select the best remedial
alternative(s) for contaminated installations, facilities, or
waste sites. The guide also assists environmental
professionals in gathering essential descriptive information
on the respective technologies. The guide incorporates cost
and performance data to the maximum extent available and
focuses primarily on demonstrated technologies. However,
information on emerging technologies also is included in
the guide. The guide can be accessed through the Internet
at .
TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIP, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies is available through this Internet subscription
service. Once a month, the service distributes by electronic
mail a message describing the availability of publications
and announcements of events. For publications, the
message explains how to obtain a hard copy or how to
download an electronic version from the Internet. For
additional information about TechDirect, contact Jeff
Heimerman at (703) 603-7191 or by E-mail at
heimerman.jeff@epamail. epa.gov. TechDirect can be
accessed through the Internet at .
Programs, Partnerships, And Organizations
EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library's holdings. The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches
by author, title, or keyword. The EPA National Library
Network Program can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR).
FRTR is an interagency working group that provides a
forum for the exchange of information regarding the
development and demonstration of innovative technologies
for the remediation of hazardous waste sites. The forum
also synthesizes the technical knowledge that Federal
Agencies have compiled and provides a more
comprehensive record of performance and cost of the
technologies. Participating agencies include DoD, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air
Force, DOE, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and EPA.
FRTR can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis
Center (GWRTAC). GWRTAC was established through a
cooperative agreement between the National Environmental
Technology Applications Center (NETAC) of the Center
for Hazardous Materials Research (CHMR) and EPA. The
goal of GWRTAC is to compile, analyze, and disseminate
information about innovative ground-water remediation
technologies to industry, the research community,
contractors, government, investors, and the public. The
center currently is compiling information to be included in
databases of interactive case studies and vendor information
that will be available on the GWRTAC Internet site.
GWRTAC can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Office of Research and Development (ORD). ORD,
under the Assistant Administrator, Paul Gray, Ph. D., is the
scientific and technological arm of EPA. Comprised of
three headquarters offices, three national research
laboratories and two national centers, ORD is organized
around a basic strategy of risk assessment and risk
assessment management to remediate environmental and
human health problems. ORD focuses on the advancement
of basic peer-reviewed scientific research and the
implementation of cost-effective, common sense
technology. Fundamental to ORD's mission is a
partnership with the academic scientific community through
extramural research grants and fellowships to help develop
the sound environmental research necessary to ensure
effective policy and regulatory decisions. ORD also
implements such programs as the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program which focuses on
D-4
-------
treatment technologies and EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification Program (ETV) which focuses on
site characterization technologies. ORD can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Remediation Technologies Development Forum
(RTDF). RTDF was established by EPA to foster public-
private partnerships that would conduct laboratory and
applied research to develop, test, and evaluate innovative
remediation technologies. RTDF's home page provides
access to information about various remediation
technologies currently being designed, developed and
evaluated through seven action teams of RTDF including:
the Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Consortium,
the LASAGNA™ Partnership, the Permeable Reactive
Barriers Action Team, the Sediments Remediation Action
Team, the In-Place Inactivation and Natural Ecological
Restoration Technologies (IINERT) Soil-Metals Action
Team, the Phytoremediation of Organics Action Team, and
the In Situ Flushing Action Team. RTDF can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for the
remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring and
measurement. Through the program, technologies are field-
tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering and
cost data are gathered on the innovative technology so that
potential users can assess the technology's applicability to a
particular site. Data collected during the field
demonstrations are used to assess the performance of the
technology, the potential need for pre- and post-processing
of the waste, applicable types of wastes and waste matrices,
potential operating problems, and approximate capital and
operating costs. The collected information is then provided
in a Innovative Technology Evaluation Report, Technology
Capsule, and Demonstration Bulletin. These reports
evaluate all available information on the technology and
analyze its overall applicability to other site characteristics,
waste types, and waste matrices. Testing procedures,
performance and cost data, and quality assurance and
quality standards also are presented. The SITE
Demonstration program can be accessed through the
Internet at .
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC).
ITRC is a state-led coalition working together with industry
an stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance of
environmental technologies. ITRC consists fo more than
35 states, the District of Columbia, multiple federal
partners, industry participants, and other stakeholders,
cooperation to break down barriers and reduce compliance
costs, making it easier to use new technologies and helping
states maximize resources. Originating in 1995 from a
previous initiative by the Western Governors Association
(WGA). ITRC brings together a diverse mix of
environmental experts and stakeholders from both the
public and private sectors to broaden and deepen technical
knowledge and streamline the regulation of new
environmental technologies. ITRC accomplishes its
mission in two ways: it develops guidance documents and
training courses to meet the needs of both regulators and
environmental consultants, and it works with state
representatives to ensure that ITRC products and services
have maximum impact among state environmental agencies
and technology users. ITRC technical work teams develop
guidance documents and both classroom and Internet-based
training courses to meet the information needs of regulatory
staff, technology vendors, and environmental consultants.
These products help state environmental agencies gain
valuable technical knowledge and develop consistent
regulatory approaches for reviewing and approving specific
technologies. State regulators lead ITRC technical teams,
which rely on broad-based participation from federal
agencies, industry, academia, and other stakeholders in
building collective knowledge and collaborative products.
ITRC can be accessed through the Internet at .
Technology Innovation Program (TIP). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIP was created
in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies. TIP's
mission is to increase the application of innovative
treatment technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils,
and groundwater. To meet that mission, TIP has expanded
its focus from treatment technologies to include site
characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process. TIP has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish
many of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources
has led to numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the
state of both remediation and site characterization. For
additional information about TIP, contact Jeff Heimerman
of EPA's TIP at (703) 603-7191. TIP can be accessed
through the Internet at
.
SITE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNOLOGIES
Electronic Sources of Information
EPA, National Exposure Research Laboratory -
Hazardous Waste Site Characterization (on CD-ROM)
(EPA 600-C-96-001). The Hazardous Waste Site
Characterization CD-ROM, developed by NERL's ESD-
LV, compiles guidance documents and related software to
aid environmental professionals in the complex,
multidisciplinary, characterizing of hazardous waste sites.
D-5
-------
The CD-ROM is a compilation of computer programs
related to EPA's RCRA and Superfund programs that can
be printed, as well as searched by key words. Using the
CD-ROM requires a personal computer with DOS Version
3.0 or higher, 640K of Ram, and 3 MB of hard disk space.
A math co-processor is recommended but not required. The
CD-ROM can be ordered on-line through the NTIS Internet
site at .
Field Sampling and Analysis Technologies Matrix. The
Matrix, developed by participating agencies of the Federal
Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR), is a matrix
and reference guide that is intended to provide users with an
understanding of the site characterization technologies
available to them and the applicability of various
technologies to their particular problem(s). The Matrix
provides a general understanding of state-of-the-art
technologies for site characterization. The Matrix and
reference guide also enhances technology information
transfer and provides much needed comparison among
competing technologies. The Matrix can be accessed
through the Internet at .
TechDirect. TechDirect, hosted by EPA's TIP, is an
information service that highlights new publications and
events of interest to environmental professionals.
Information about site characterization and remediation
technologies are available through this Internet subscription
service. Approximately once a month, the service
distributes by electronic mail a message describing the
availability of publications and announcements of events.
For publications, the message explains how to obtain a hard
copy or how to download an electronic version from the
Internet. To subscribe to TechDirect and view archived
messages, go to .
Programs, Partnerships, and Organizations
Consortium for Site Characterization and Technology
(CSCT). CSCT was established as one of 12 pilot projects
currently implemented by EPA's Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) Program. The CSCT is a
partnership program among the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Defense
(DoD), and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that is
responsible for evaluating and verifying the performance of
innovative site characterization technologies. The CSCT
provides support to technology developers, evaluates and
verifies data generated during demonstrations, and develops
and disseminates information about the performance of site
characterization technologies. CSCT can be accessed
through the Internet at .
Environmental Technology Verification Program. The
ETV program seeks to provide credible performance data
on environmental technologies from independent third
parties under the auspices of EPA. It verifies the
performance of innovative technical solutions to problems
that threaten human health or the environment. Managed
by EPA's ORD, ETV was created to substantially
accelerate the entrance of new environmental technologies
into domestic and international marketplaces. It supplies
buyers of technologies, developers of those technologies,
consulting engineers, states, and EPA regions with high-
quality data on the performance of new technologies. ETV
expands on past verification efforts, such as those
conducted under the SITE program for remediation
technologies. ETV currently implements 10 pilot projects,
including the Consortium for Site Characterization
Technology (CSCT). The ETV program can be accessed
through the Internet at .
EPA Library Network Program. The EPA National
Library Network Program is a repository of information
from EPA's Headquarters, Regional and Field Offices,
Research Centers, and specialized laboratories throughout
the country. The Library Network provides access to its
collection through the On-line Library System (OLS), a
menu-driven database of the library's holdings. The OLS
provides users with the ability to perform online searches
by author, title, or keyword. The material on OLS is
updated every two weeks. The EPA National Library
Network Program can be accessed through the Internet at
.
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Demonstration Program. The SITE Demonstration
program was established by EPA's Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response and the Office of Research and
Development to encourage the development and
implementation of innovative treatment technologies for the
remediation of hazardous waste sites, and monitoring and
measurement. Through the program, technologies are field-
tested on hazardous waste materials and engineering and
cost data are gathered on the innovative technology so that
potential users can assess the technology's applicability to a
particular site. Data collected during the field
demonstrations are used to assess the performance of the
technology, the potential need for pre- and post-processing
of the waste, applicable types of wastes and waste matrices,
potential operating problems, and approximate capital and
operating costs. The collected information is then provided
in a Innovative Technology Evaluation Report, Technology
Capsule, and Demonstration Bulletin. These reports
evaluate all available information on the technology and
analyze its overall applicability to other site characteristics,
waste types, and waste matrices. Testing procedures,
performance and cost data, and quality assurance and
quality standards also are presented. The SITE
Demonstration program can be accessed through the
Internet at .
D-6
-------
Technology Innovation Program (TIP). The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) TIP was created
in 1990 to act as an advocate for new technologies. TIP's
mission is to increase the application of innovative
treatment technologies to contaminated waste sites, soils,
and groundwater. To Meet that mission, TIP has expanded
its focus from treatment technologies to include site
characterization technologies in order to improve the
remediation process. TIP has encouraged and relied on
cooperative ventures with other partners to accomplish
many of its goals. This effort to effectively use resources
has led to numerous joint efforts that have enhanced the
state of both remediation and site characterization. For
additional information about TIP, contact Jeff Heimerman
of EPA's TIP at (703) 603-7191. TIP can be accessed
through the Internet at
.
D-7
-------
Appendix E
GLOSSARY OF REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES
E-l
-------
This Appendix presents definitions and brief discussions of several innovative
remediation technologies. Established/conventional technologies (including pump and treat,
stabilization, vitrification, incineration, and excavation/disposal) are being replaced by these
state-of-the-art, typically more cost-effective technologies. These established/conventional
technologies are also discussed in this Appendix.
Innovative Remediation Technologies
BIOREMEDIATION uses microorganisms to degrade organic contaminants in either
excavated or in situ soil, sludge, and solids. The microorganisms break down contaminants by
using them as a food source or cometabolizing them with a food source. Land farming, biopiles,
composting, and slurry-phase bioremediation are examples of ex situ applications. Bioventing is
a common form of in situ bioremediation which uses extraction wells to circulate air through the
ground.
CHEMICAL TREATMENT, also known as chemical reduction/oxidation, typically
converts hazardous contaminants to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds that are more stable,
less mobile, or inert. The oxidizing agents most commonly used for treatment of hazardous
contaminants in soil are ozone, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorites, chlorine, chlorine dioxide,
potassium permanganate, and Fentons reagent (hydrogen peroxide and iron). Cyanide oxidation
and dechlorination are examples of chemical treatment. This method may be applied in situ or
ex situ, to soils, sludges, sediments, and other solids, and may also be applied for the in situ
treatment of groundwater.
ELECTROCHEMICAL REMEDIATION involves the passage of AC/DC current to
mineralize organic compounds and to mobilize and remove metal contaminants. The electrical
field created within the soil or sediment causes redox reactions that mineralize the organics and
increase mobilization of metals. The metals migrate to the electrodes where they are deposited
and removed.
IN SITU SOIL FLUSHING: large volumes of water, at times supplemented with
surfactants, cosolvents, or treatment compounds, are applied to the soil or injected into the
groundwater to raise the water table into the contaminated soil zone. Injected water and
E-2
-------
treatment agents are isolated within the underlying aquifer and recovered together with flushed
contaminants.
PHYTOREMEDIATION is a process that uses plants (roots, shoots, tissues, and leaves)
to remove, transfer, stabilize, or destroy contaminants in soil, sediment, and groundwater.
Phytoremediation applies to all biological, chemical, and physical processes that are influenced
by plants and that aid in cleanup of the contaminated substances. Plants can be used in site
remediation, both through the mineralization of toxic organic compounds and through the
accumulation and concentration of heavy metals and other inorganic compounds from soil into
aboveground shoots. Phytoremediation may be applied in situ or ex situ, to soils, sludges,
sediments, other solids, or groundwater.
DUAL-PHASE EXTRACTION, also known as multi-phase extraction, uses a vacuum
system to remove various combinations of contaminated groundwater, separate-phase petroleum
product, and vapors from the subsurface. The system lowers the water table around the well,
exposing more of the formation. Contaminants in the newly exposed unsaturated zone are then
accessible to soil vapor extraction. Once above ground, the extracted vapors or liquid-phase
organics and ground water are separated and treated.
NANOTECHNOLOGY is described as the ability to work at the molecular level to create
structures with new organizations and characteristics. Applications of this emerging technology
include advances in pollution prevention, detection, and waste treatment, and remediation.
Nanotechnology may allow for the removal of contaminants to levels currently unattainable and
in a cost-effective manner.
SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION (S/S) reduces the mobility of hazardous
substances and contaminants in the environment through both physical and chemical means. The
S/S process physically binds or encloses contaminants within a stabilized mass. S/S is performed
both ex situ and in situ. Ex situ S/S requires excavation of the material to be treated, and the
resultant material must be disposed. In situ S/S uses auger/caisson systems and injector head
systems to add binders to the contaminated soil or waste without excavation, and the resultant
material is left in place.
SOLVENT EXTRACTION uses an organic solvent as an extractant to separate organic
and metal contaminants from soil. The organic solvent is mixed with contaminated soil in an
extraction unit. The extracted solution is then passed through a separator, where the
E-3
-------
contaminants and extractant are separated from the soil. Organically bound metals may be
extracted along with the target organic contaminants.
IN SITU THERMAL DESORPTION: wastes are heated so that organic contaminants
and water volatilize. Typically, a carrier gas or vacuum system transports the volatilized water
and organics to a gas treatment system.
THERMALLY ENHANCED RECOVERY uses heat to increase the volatilization rate of
organics and facilitate extraction. Volatilized contaminants are typically removed from the
vadose zone using soil vapor extraction. Specific types of these thermally enhanced recovery
techniques include Contained Recovery of Oily Waste (CROW™), radio frequency heating,
conductive heating, steam heating, in situ steam stripping, hot air injection, dynamic
underground stripping, in situ thermal desorption, and electrical resistance heating. Thermally
enhanced recovery is usually applied to contaminated soil, but may also be applied to
groundwater.
VITRIFICATION uses an electric current to melt contaminated soil at elevated
temperatures (1,600 to 2,000°C or 2,900 to 3,650°F). Upon cooling, the vitrification product is a
chemically stable, leach-resistant, glass and crystalline material similar to obsidian or basalt
rock. The high temperature component of the process destroys or removes organic materials.
Radionuclides and heavy metals are retained within the vitrified product. Vitrification may be
conducted in situ or ex situ.
TREATMENT BARRIERS, also known as permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) or passive
treatment walls, are installed across the flow path of a contaminated groundwater plume,
allowing the water portion of the plume to flow through the wall. These barriers allow the
passage of water while prohibiting the movement of contaminants by employing agents within
the wall such as zero-valent metals, chelators, sorbents, and microbes. The contaminants are
either degraded or retained in a concentrated form by the barrier material, which may need to be
replaced periodically.
Conventional Remediation Technologies
AIR SPARGING involves the injection of air or oxygen through a contaminated aquifer.
Injected air traverses horizontally and vertically in channels through the soil column, creating an
E-4
-------
underground stripper that removes volatile and semivolatile organic contaminants by
volatilization. Soil Vapor Extraction is usually implemented in conjunction with air sparging to
remove the generated vapor-phase contamination from the unsaturated zone. Oxygen added to
the contaminated groundwater and vadose-zone soils also can enhance biodegradation of
contaminants below and above the water table.
EX SITU THERMAL DESORPTION: wastes are heated so that organic contaminants
and water volatilize. Typically, a carrier gas or vacuum system transports the volatilized water
and organics to a gas treatment system.
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (SVE) is used to remediate the zone of soil which is
unsaturated with contaminated groundwater. A vacuum is applied to the soil to control the flow
of air and remove volatile and some semivolatile organic contaminants from the soil.
For SOIL WASHING, contaminants are absorbed onto fine soil particle surfaces and are
separated from bulk soil in a water-based system on the basis of particle size. The wash water
may be augmented with a basic leaching agent, surfactant, or chelating agent or by adjustment of
pH to help remove organics and heavy metals. Soils and wash water are mixed ex situ in a tank
or other treatment unit. The wash water and various soil fractions are usually separated using
gravity settling.
VERTICAL ENGINEERED BARRIERS (VEBs) are subsurface barriers made of an
impermeable material designed to contain or divert groundwater. VEBs can be used to contain
contaminated groundwater, divert uncontaminated groundwater from a contaminated area, or
divert contaminated groundwater from a drinking water intake or other protected resource.
INCINERATION involves the ex situ destruction of contaminated soil, sludge, and
sediment in high temperature (1,800 - 2,200°F) combustion devices. A typical hazardous waste
incinerator consists of a rotary kiln (primary combustion chamber), an afterburner (secondary
combustion chamber), connected to an air pollution control system, all of which are controlled
and monitored.
PUMP-AND-TREAT involves removal of contaminated groundwater from the
subsurface. Treatment and discharge or reinjection is one of the most widely used ground-water
remediation technologies. The pump and treat remediation approach is used at about three-
quarters of the Superfund sites where ground water is contaminated and at most sites where
cleanup is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and state laws. It is often
E-5
-------
associated with treatment technologies such as Air Stripping and Liquid -phase Granular
Activated Charcoal. Although the effectiveness of pump and treat systems has been called into
question after two decades of use, this approach remains a necessary component of most ground-
water remediation efforts and can be appropriate for both restoration and plume containment.
E-6
------- |