»'
V
                                                                             OSWER Directive #9841.1 A

                                      Administrative  Penalty Procedures.
                                                      Vol. 54, N  93
                                                  Tuesday  May  6, 1989

                  AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
                  DOC TYPE: Rules and Regulations
                  CFR: 40 CFR Part 22
                  NUMBER: FRL-3464-2
                  ACTION: Interim final rale
                  SUMMARY:  EPA  is today promulgating an interim final rule establishing  procedures for the
                  administrative assessment of civil penalties under (1)  section 109 of the Comprehensive
                  Environmental Response, Compensation,   and  Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 etseq.,
                  as amended by the  Supedund  Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, Pub. L. No.
                  99-499, for violations of provisions specified in section 109 of CERCLA,  including failing to
                  report  releases-of hazardous substances, and (2) section 325 of the Emergency Planning and
                  Community Right-To-Know Act  (EPCRA), 42 U.S.C. 11001 et seq., for violations of provisions
                  specified  in  section 325  of EPCRA. The rule provides that me administrative  assessment of
                  CERCLA  section 109 penalties and EPCRA  section 325  penalties .will be  governed by
                  EPA's Consolidated Rules of Practice  Governing  the Administrative Assessment of Civil
                  Penalties and by supplemental rales relating specifically to penalty assessments under section 109 of
                  CERCLA and section 325 of EPCRA. EPA is taking mis action in response to amendments to
                  CERCLA made by SARA,  which authorize the   President to assess administrative penalties for
                  certain violations of  CERCLA  and which  authorize the Administrator  of EPA to assess
                  administrative  penalties for violations of EPCRA. The authority granted  to  assess administrative
                  penalties was  effective upon the  date of enactment of SARA, which was October 17, 1986.
                  DATES: Comments on this interim final rule must be submitted on or before  July  17,  1989. This
                  interim final rale is effective on May 16, 1989, and governs all proceedings for the administrative
                  assessment of a civil penalty under section  109 of CERCLA or section 325 of EPCRA for which an
                  administrative  complaint is filed after May 16, 1989. EPA will use this   rale as  guidance for
                  conducting these proceedings prior to die date it  becomes effective on an interim final basis.
                  ADDRESS: Persons  may  mail comments on mis interim final rale to Sandra  Connors, Office of
                  Enforcement and Compliance Moni-jnng, Hazardous Waste  Division (LE-134S),  Room 3219L,
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401  M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460. Persons may
                  inspect comments at that address.
                  POM FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra  Connors, Office of Enforcement and
                  Compliance Monitoring, Hazardous Waste Division (LE-134S), U.S. Environmental Protection
                  Agency,  401 M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460, 202-382-3110.
                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                  Statutory Background  ,                 .
                    On  October 17,  1986,  the Supedund Amendment:, wd Reauthorization Act (SARA),  jf  1986,
                  Pub. L. No. 99-499,  was enacted, title I of SARA amended the Comprehensive Environmental    •
                  Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA),  42 U.S.C. 9601  et^seq.,\>y

-------
 40 CFP ?»rt 22                                                        Admiriutrativt Penalty Procedures

 revising section 109, 42 U.S.C.  9609, which authorizes  the  President to  assess administrative
 penalties  for  violations  of specified provisions of CERCLA, Title HI of SARA is the Emergency
 Planning  and  Community RighMo-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA).  Section  32S(b) of EPCRA,  42
 U.S.C.  11045(b)» authorizes the Administrator  of EPA to assess administrative penalties for
 violations o!  mergen,/  notification under section 304 r   cFCRA. Section 325(c) of EPCRA
 authorizes the Administrator of EPA to assess admini?*7t,dve penalties for reporting violations under,
 sectioi;  311, 312, 313, 322 or 323 of EPCRA, Seetic   325(d) of EPCRA  authorizes  the
 Administrator of EPA to  assess administrative  penalties  for frivolous  trade secret claims  made
 in violation of section 322 of EPCRA.               .    .  ,

    Section  109  and  section 325(b) established  two  'classes*  of administrative penalties,
 which differ with respect  to allowable procedure and maximum assessment.  The provisions for
 Class I penalties allow for a maximum penalty of $25,000 per violation  and the  Respondent
 must be provided notice and an opportunity for hearing. The provisions for Class n penalties
 authorize  a  maximum penalty of $25,000 per day for each day during which the violation
 continues and ajnaximum penalty of $75,000 per day  for each day  during  which the violation
 continues for a second or  subsequent violation and are explicitly made subject'to the requirements  of
 the  Administrative  Procedure  Act (APA),  5 U.S.C.  554, 556. Class II proceedings are similar
 to administrative adjudicawry proceedings employed by the Agency  under other  environmental
 statutes, which are subject to section 554 of the APA.

   Sections  325  (c) and  (d)  of  EPCRA  are  silent as to the type of administrative  hearing
 procedures to  be  employed for the assessment of penalties under these sections.  Section
 325(c)(l)  authorizes a maximum penalty of  $25,000  per day  for each day during which the
 violation continues and section 325(c)(2) authorizes a maximum of $10,000 per day for each day
 during which the violation continues. The penalties under section 325(c) may be assessed on a daily
 basis. Section 325(d) of EPCRA authorizes a penalty of $25,000 per frivolous trade secret claim.

   Under  section 109(a) of CERCLA, a Class I penalty requires only notice and opportunity  for
 hearing,  A Class n penalty under section  109(b) of CERCLA may be  assessed by the President
 through an order issued after opportunity  for  a hearing on the record in accordance with section 554
 of the  Administrative  Procedure Act  (APA), 5 U.S.C. 554. The authority to assess penalties
 under > CERGLA section 109 has been delegated to EPA (see Executive Oder 12580 of January 23,
 1987, 52 PR  2923 (January 29, 1987).

   Class I and Class II civil penalties under section 109 may be assessed for  (1) a violation of the
emergency release notification requirements of section  103 (a) or (b); (2) a violation of section
 103(d)(2)  (relating to recordlteeping);  (3)  a violation of die requirements of section 108, the
 regulations issued under section 108, or with any denial or detention order under section  108
 (relating to financial responsibility); (4) a violation of  an  order under section 122(d)(3) (relating to '
 settlement agreements for  action under section 104(b)); or (5) any failure or refusal referred to in
 section  122(1)  (relating to violations of administrative orders, consent decrees, or agreements with
 federal facilLies under section 120).                                                  ;

-------
 40 CFR Put 22                         .                              Administrative Finally Procedures

    Under section  325(b)(2) of EPCRA, a Class H penalty is assessed and collected by the
 Administrator in the same manner, and subject to the same provisions,Has in the case of civil
 penalties assessed and collected under section 16 of the Toxic  Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C.
 2615. Those penalties are assessed by an order  issued after opportunity for a hearing on  the record
 in accc  lance with section 554 of the APA. A Oar  I penalty under section 325(b)(l) of E?™ *
 requites ot.7 notice and opportunity for a hearing.

    Under section  325(cX4)  of EPCRA,  the Administrator may assess by administrative order
 any civil penalty for which a person is liable under section 325(c). Under section 325(c)(l), a penalty
 of not more than $25,000 for each  violation may be assessed for violations of the right-to-know
 reporting requirements under sections 312  or 313 of EPCRA. Under section 325(c)(2), a penalty
 of not more than $10,000 for each violation may be assessed for violations of section 311  or
 323(b) requirements or for failure to  furnish information  under section  322(a)(2). For purposes of
 section 325(c),  each  day  a violation  continues constitutes a se^.,«D violation.  Under  section
 325(d) of EPCRA, the Administrator may assess by administrative order a penalty of $25,000 per
 frivolous trade secret claim made under section 322(dX4).
                           (             •                         "                    .
        Both sections 109 and 325 authorize EPA to issue supoenas to obtain the attendance and
 testimony of witnesses and the production of documents. A person subject to an order assessing a
 Class n penalty under section 109 may seek judicial review of the order with the appropriate
 United States Court of Appeals. A person subject to an order assessing a Class I penalty under
 section 109 or a penalty under section 325 may seek judicial review of the order with the appropriate
 United States District Court.

 Description of final Rule
   This  interim final rule applies formal APA hearing procedures at this time to ail EPA
 administrative penalty authorities under CERCLA section 109 and  EPCRA  section 325.  The
 Agency  is currently considering developing procedures for  assessing Class I penalties that would be
 less formal man the Part 22 procedures and  that would apply to penalties under section I09(b)(l)
of  CERCLA, section 325(bXI) of EPCRA, section 325(d) of EPCRA, and to certain civil penalties
under section 325(c) of EPCRA.

   EPA   promulgated   Consolidated  Rules  of Practice  Governing  the Administrative
Assessment  of Civil Penalties and Revocation or  Suspension of Permits at 40 CFR Part 22.
Those  rules govern the administrative assessment of penalties under other statutes administered by
EPA subject to the  adjudicatory  hearing requirements of  the APA or for which EPA has
determined such  procedures are appropriate. The Consolida&d Rules are designed  to provide a
common set of procedural rules for certain of EPA's administrative  penalty programs,  in   order
to  reduce paperwork, inconsistency,  and  the burden on the regulated community. See 45 FR
24360 (April 9, 1980).

   Under the Consolidated  Rules of Practice,  EVA will assess CERCLA section  109  penalties
and EPCRA section 325 penalties by an order issued after opportunity  for a hearing on the record.
EPA has concluded that the Consolidated Rules  should  be followed, on an interim final basis, as

-------
 40 CFR Part Z2                                                        Administrative Penalty Procedures

 the procedural  framework  to  assess penalties under section 109 of CERCLA and section  325 of
 EPCRA, Accordingly, this interim final rule provides that the  Consolidated  Rules  will  govern
 adjudicatory  proceedings for  the assessment of civil  administrative penalties under section  109 of
 CERCLA and section 325 of EPCRA.

   In addi*"on, as part of today's rulernaking, EPA  is   omuigating, on an interim  final  basis,
 supplement^ to the Consolidated Rules which  apply to * ERCLA  section , 109 and EPCRA
 section  325  penalty procedures.  The supplemental  rule  is  necessary  because of requirements
 specific to provisions of the  two statutes.  The supplemental rules codify subpoena requirements
 and   the  procedures  for  seeking judicial review of penalty assessments,  and describe certain
 procedures for payment and collection of penalties assessed.

   EPA requests comments on  any of the above matters.

 Interim final Rule
   EPA is issuing the rule on an interim final basis pursuant to 5 U.S.C.  553(b) (A) and (B), which
 allows the issuance of rules without prior notice and comment  where the rules concern agency
 practice or procedure or where the Agency finds for  good cause .that  prior notice  and
 comment is unnecessary. Both of these criteria are met by these rules. The statutes specifically
 identify the type of hearing to be accorded for assessment of Class D penalties, I.e. formal
 adjudications under section 554 of the APA. Although other sections are silent as to  the type
 of procedures or specifically  authorize a  less formal  set of procedures, the Agency has elected  to
 apply the formal adjudications requirements to all penalty actions  at  this  time.  EPA has long-
 established regulations implementing section  554 hearings  for civil penalty assessment under
 several other environmental  statutes. The regulations, codified at 40 CFR Part 22,  were promulgated
 after, notice  and opportunity to comment. Because the statute leaves  little discretion with respect
 to the  type of procedure to be afforded for Class II violations  and this rule makes well-established
 rules providing  full  adjudicatory  procedures  applicable to all  penalty proceedings under
 section 109  of CERCLA and section 32S of EPCRA, EPA believes that  notice  and  comment
 on this rule is "unnecessary* under section 553 of the APA.

   Furthermore,  use of the Consolidated Rules on an interim basis will facilitate  EPA  beginning
prompt implementation of  the administrative penalty  authority, using uniform procedures while
 satisrying the procedural and  substantive requirements established by  CERCLA and EPCRA. EPA is,
however,  .naking this rule "interim final" in order to allow an opportunity for public comment  and  a
revision  of  the final rule as necessary in the future based on public comments.

   The  interim  final rule is effective upon publication in the Federal Register.  The Consolidated
Rules of Practice will govern proceedings for  the assessment of administrative penalties under  section
 109 of CERCLA and section  325 of  EPCRA for which a complaint is filed after that date. The
proposed  interim  final rule will be used by EPA as guidance prior to that date.

-------
40 CFR Ptn 22            "•       •                                    vWmJJiuwafw Ptnalfji
                             *••                            •
                                                           '-
 Regulatory Flexibility Act (
    Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 through 612, whenever  an agency  is
 required to publish a general notice of rulemaking for any  proposed or final  rule, it must prepare
 and make sellable for public  comment, a  regvlatory  ?exibillty analysis  which describes the
 impact of   e  rule  pi. small entities (i.e., small bt   Basses, small organizations, and:small
 governments jurisdictions). Toe Administrator may cer^fy, however, that the rule will not have a
 significant economic impact on a  substantial  number  of small  entities. In such circumstances, a
 regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.

   The expected  impact of the rule on small entities is negligible. The rule codifies already
 existing statutory provisions and is procedural. Thus,  it does not  impose additional  regulatory
 requirements on small entities.                                           '

   Accordingly,  I  hereby  certify that these regulations will not have a significant impact  on a
 substantial  number of small entities. These regulations, therefore, do not require a regulatory
 flexibility analysis.             '                    '      .                               .  .  •

 Executive Order No.  12291
   Under Executive Order  12291, the Agency must judge whether a regulation is "major1' and thus
 subject to the requirement to prepare a Regulatory Impact Analysis.  The notice published today is
 not major because die rule will  not result in an effect on the economy of $100  million or more, will
 not  result in increased costs or prices,;will not have significant adverse effects   on  competition,
 employment,  investment,  productivity,  and innovation, and will not significantly disrupt domestic
 or export markets. Therefore, the  Agency has not prepared a Regulatory Impact Analysis under the
 Executive'Order.   '         ,         . •           ••'.•.

   This regulation  was  submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review as
 required by Executive Order No. 12291.       ,

 Paperwork Reduction Act
   These  interim  final rules do not contain any information collection requirements  subject to
OMB  review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFM Fart 22
   Administrative  practice and procedures,  Environmental protection, Extremely hazardous
 substances, Hazardous chemicals, Hazardous substances, Hazardous wastes, Penalties,  Superfund,
Title III of SARA.
   Dated: May  8, 1989.                               -

 William K. Rally,
Administrator.                          .     '                           ••       .'    .    ,
                '   •               . '"'            .        •-._.•*..     "          •, . •
   For the reasons set out in the preamble, and under aut" ority of section 109 of the  Comprehensive
 Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9609,

-------
 40 CFR Put 22                                                      Administrative Penalty Procedwts

 and section 325 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA),
 42 U.S.C. 1 1045, and Executive Order 12580, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
 amended on an interim basis effective on May 16,  1989  is follows:

 PART 12 - [AMENDED]
 1 . The Authority citation for Part 22 is revised to read as follows:
 Authority: IS U.S.C. sec. 2615; 42 U.S.C. sees. 7545 and 7601; 7 U.S.C. sees.  136(1) and (m); 33
 U.S.C. sees. 1319,  1415 and 1418; 42 U.S.C. sees. 6912, 6928, and 6991(e); 42 U.S.C. sec. 9609;
 42 U.S.C. sec. 11045,

 2. Section 22.01 is amended by revising paragraph (»X6) and by adding paragraphs (a)(7) and (a)(8)
 to read as follows:,

 Sec. 22.01 Scope of these rules.
   (6) The assessment of any Class II penalty under section 309(g) of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1319(g));
                                                                      i
   (7) The assessment of any administrative penalty under section 109 of the  Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1920, as amended (42 U.S.C. 9609);

   (8) The assessment of any administrative penalty under section 325 of the  Emergency Planning
and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) (42 U.S.C. 1 1045).

   3. Add a new Sec. 22.39, to read as follows:

Sec.  22.39 Supplemental rales of practice governing the administrative assessment  of
administrative  penalties  under section  109  of  the Comprehensive  Environmental
Response,  Compensation, ami Liability Act of 1980, as amended.

   (a) Scope of these Supplfmcnra!  rules. These Supplemental rules of practice shall govern, in
conjunction with the preceding Consolidated Rules of Practice (40 CFR Part 22), administrative
proceedings for the assessment of  any civil penalty under section 109 of the Comprehensive
Envirorjnental Response,  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (42 U.S.C. 9609).
Where inconsistencies exist between these Supplemental rules and die Consolidated  Rules  (Sees.
22.01 through 22.32), these Supplemental rules shall apply.

   (b) Subpoenas. (1) The attendance  and testimony of witnesses or the production of relevant
papers, books, and documents may be required by subpoena. The Presiding Officer may grant a
request for a subpoena upon a showing of (i) the grout.*** and necessity therefor, and (ii) (he
materiality and relevancy  of the evidence to be adduced.  Requests for the production of documents
shall   describe  the   evidence sought as  specifically  as practicable.

-------
4QimP*n22                                                        Administrativt ftnalty Proctdurts

   (2) Subpoenas shall  be served in accordance with Sec. 22.0S(b)(l) of the Consolidated Rules of
Practice.
                         ••-, »,'  •      '                    %$&  •                    •'    J
                                      .                       "V *"
   (3) Witnesses  summoned before the Presiding Officer snail be paid the same  fees  and mileage
that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States. Fees shall  be paid by the narty at     '
whose in;  ace the witness appeal?.   Where  a witne   appears pursuant to a request initiated by the
Pres ling Officer,  fees s*^(l be t 
-------
  40 CFR Pwt 22                                                        Administrative Penalty Procedures

     (2)  Subpoenas  shall be served in accordance with Sec. 22.05(b)(I) of the Consolidated Rules of
  Practice.
        1                                                                •
     (3)  Witnesses summoned before the Presiding  Ticer shiJI be paid the same fees and mileae-
  that are pa ' witnesses in the courts of the United State   Fees shall be  paid  by  the party at
  whose instance the witness appears.  Where a  witness  appears  pursuant to request initiated by the
  Presiding Officer, fees shall be paid by the Agency.
                                                             '     l                    '
    (c) Judicial  review.  Any person against  whom a  civil penalty is assessed may seek judicial
,  review in the appropriate district court of the United  States by filing a notice of appeal and by
 simultaneously sending a copy of such notice by certified mail to the Administrator. The notice must
 be  filed within  30 days of die date the order making such assessment was issued.  The
 Administrator shall  promptly file in such court a certified copy  c:  the record upon which such
 violation was found or such penalty imposed.                   ,                    ,     .

    (d) Procedures for collection of civil penalty. If any person fails to pay an  assessment  of a
 civil  penalty  after it has become a final and unappealable order or  after the  appropriate court
 has  entered final judgment in  favor of the United States, the Administrator may request the
 Attorney General of the United States to institute a civiJ action in an appropriate district court of
 the United States to collect the penalty, and such court shall have jurisdiction to hear and decide  any
 such action.  In hearing such action, the court shall have authority to review the violation and the
 assessment of the civil penalty on the record. Interest on overdue payments shall be collected
 pursuant to the Debt Collection Act, 37 U.S.C. 3717.       ,

 [INTERNAL DATA; PR  Doc,  89-11703; Filed 5-15-89;  8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-M  ,

-------