2001  Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program
                        Muscatine, IA ,  Davenport, IA
                                                       Chester, NJ
                                                        lizabeth, NJ
                                                       New Brunswick, N J
                                                     Camden, NJ
    Phoenix, .97
             EIPifiO,TX
                                  Gulf Port, MS
                                   St. Petersburg, Fl
                                                 Tampa, HL
                                                         San Juan, PR

                                                      Barceloneta, PR

-------
                                                    EPA454/R-02-010
                                                         October 2002
2001 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP)
                        By:
               Eastern Research Group
              Morrisville, North Carolina
                    Prepared for:
        Sharon Nizich, Delivery Order Manager
       Monitoring and Quality Assurance Group
              Contract No. 68-D-99-007
             Delivery Order No. 14 and 18
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
       Monitoring and Quality Assurance Group
             Research Triangle Park, NC

-------
                                    DISCLAIMER
Through its Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency funded and managed the research described in this report under EPA Contract
No. 68-D-99-007 to Eastern Research Group, Inc.  This report has been subjected to the
Agency's peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA
document. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for their use.
                                          11

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                               Page

      List of Figures	  vii
      List of Tables  	x
      List of Abbreviations  	xiv
      Executive Summary  	  xvii

1.0   Introduction	1-1

2.0   The 2001UATMP                                                           2-1

      2.1     Monitoring Locations	2-1
      2.2     Compounds Selected for Monitoring	2-3
      2.3     Sampling Schedules	2-3
      2.4     Completeness	2-5
      2.5     Sampling and Analytical Methods	2-6

             2.5.1    VOC Sampling and Analytical Method 	2-7
             2.5.2    Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Method	2-8
             2.5.3    Semivolatile Sampling and Analytical Method  	2-10

3.0   Summary of the 2001 UATMP Data                                           3-1

      3.1     Data Summary Parameters	3-2

             3.1.1    Number of Sampling Detects 	3-2
             3.1.2    Concentration Range	3-3
             3.1.3    Geometric Means  	3-3
             3.1.4    Prevalence	3-3
             3.1.5    Pearson Correlations	3-6

      3.2     UATMP Compound Groups 	3-7

             3.2.1    Hydrocarbons  	3-7
             3.2.2    Halogenated Hydrocarbons	3-8
             3.2.3    Polar Compounds  	3-8
             3.2.4    Carbonyl Compounds	3-9

      3.3     Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters	3-9

             3.3.1    Maximum and Average Temperature	3-9
             3.3.2    Moisture Parameters	3-10
             3.3.3    Wind Information	3-10
                                         in

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
                                                                                    age
      3.4    The Impact of Motor Vehicle Emissions on Spatial Variations  	3-11
             3.4.1     Motor Vehicle Owner Data	3-12
             3.4.2     Motor Vehicle Emission Profiles  	3-13
             3.4.3     Estimated Traffic Data  	3-14

      3.5    Variability Analysis	3-14

4.0   Site in Arizona	4-1

      4.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at Arizona Site	4-1
      4.2    Spatial Analysis	4-3

5.0   Sites in Colorado	5-1

      5.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Colorado  Sites 	5-2
      5.2    Spatial Analysis	5-3

6.0   Sites in Florida                                                                 6-1

      6.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Florida Sites	6-2
      6.2    Spatial Analysis	6-3

7.0   Sites in Iowa	7-1

      7.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Iowa Sites	7-2
      7.2    Spatial Analysis	7-4

8.0   Sites in Michigan                                                               8-1

      8.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Michigan Sites 	8-2
      8.2    Spatial Analysis	8-3

9.0   Sites in Mississippi  	9-1

      9.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Mississippi Sites	9-2
      9.2    Spatial Analysis	9-3

10.0  Sites in Missouri                                                              10-1

      10.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Missouri Sites	10-1
      10.2   Spatial Analysis	10-2

11.0  Sites in New Jersey  	11-1
                                           IV

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
                                                                                  age
      11.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the New Jersey Sites  	11-2
      11.2    Spatial Analysis	11-3

12.0  Site in North Dakota                                                         12-1

      11.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the North Dakota Site	12-1
      11.2    Spatial Analysis	12-2

13.0  Sites in Puerto Rico                                                          13-1

      13.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Puerto Rico Sites  	13-1
      13.2    Spatial Analysis	13-3

14.0  Site in South Dakota                                                         14-1

      14.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the South Dakota Sites	14-1
      14.2    Spatial Analysis	14-2

15.0  Sites in Texas	15-1

      15.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Texas Site	15-2
      15.2    Spatial Analysis	15-3

16.0  Site in Utah  	16-1

      16.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Utah Site	16-1
      16.2    Spatial Analysis	16-2

17.0  Data Quality                                                                17-1

      17.1    Precision	17-1
             17.1.1   Analytical Precision  	17-2
             17.1.2  Sampling and Analytical Precision	17-5

      17.2    Accuracy  	17-8

18.0  Conclusions and Recommendations  	18-1

      18.1    Conclusions 	18-1
      18.2    Recommendations  	18-4

19.0  References  	19-1

-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
List of Appendices




Appendix A




Appendix B




Appendix C




Appendix D




Appendix E




Appendix F




Appendix G




Appendix H




Appendix I




Appendix J




Appendix K




Appendix L




Appendix M




Appendix N
                                                                             age
AIRS Site Descriptions for the 2001 UATMP Monitoring Stations  A-l




2001 Summary of Invalidated UATMP Samples by Site	B-l




2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring  	C-l




2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring  	 D-l




2001 Summary Tables of Carbonyl Monitoring	E-l




2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring 	F-l




2001 Summary Tables for Metals Monitoring	 G-l




2001 Summary Tables for Hexavalent Chromium Monitoring .... H-l




2001 VOC Raw Monitoring Data	 1-1




2001 SNMOC Raw Monitoring Data	J-l




2001 Carbonyl Raw Monitoring Data	 K-l




2001 SVOC Raw Monitoring Data	L-l




2001 Metal Raw Monitoring Data  	M-l




2001 Hexavalent Chromium Raw Monitoring Data	 N-l
                                       VI

-------
                                 LIST OF FIGURES
                                                                                 age
2-1   Monitoring Locations for the 2001 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program  	2-12
3-1   Comparison of the Geometric Means of the Compound Groups	3-16
3-2   Geometric Mean of Acetaldehyde by Monitoring Location	3-17
3-3   Geometric Mean of Acetone by Monitoring Location	3-18
3-4   Geometric Mean of Acetylene by Monitoring Location	3-19
3-5   Geometric Mean of Benzene  by Monitoring Location	3-20
3-6   Geometric Mean of Chloromethane by Monitoring Location  	3-21
3-7   Geometric Mean of Dichlorodifluoromethane by Monitoring Location 	3-22
3-8   Geometric Mean of Ethylbenzene by Monitoring Location	3-23
3-9   Geometric Mean of Formaldehyde by Monitoring Location 	3-24
3-10  Geometric Mean ofm-,p- Xylene by Monitoring Location 	3-25
3-11  Geometric Mean of Methyl Ethyl Metone by Monitoring Location  	3-26
3-12  Geometric Mean of Methylene Chloride by Monitoring Location	3-27
3-13  Geometric Mean of o-Xylene by Monitoring Location 	3-28
3-14  Geometric Mean of Propylene by Monitoring Location	3-29
3-15  Geometric Mean of Toluene by Monitoring Location 	3-30
3-16  Comparison of Concentration Ratios forBTEXvs. Roadside Study	3-31
3-17  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Acetaldehyde Across 36 Sites	3-36
3-18  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Acetone Across 36 Sites	3-37
3-19  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Acetylene Across 35 Sites  	3-38
3-20  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Benzene Across 35 Sites	3-39
3-21  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Chloromethane Across 35 Sites 	3-40
3-22  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Dichlorodifluoromethane Across 35 Sites  	3-41
3-23  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Ethybenzene Across 35 Sites 	3-42
3-24  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Formaldehyde Across 36 Sites	3-43
3-25  Coefficient of Variance Analysis ofm-,p- Xylene Across 35 Sites	3-44
3-26  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Methyl Ethyl Ketone Across 35 Sites	3-45
3-27  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Methylene Chloride Across 35 Sites	3-46
3-28  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of o-Xylene Across 35 Sites 	3-47
3-29  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Propylene Across 35 Sites  	3-48
3-30  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Toluene Across 35 Sites	3-49
3-3 la Average Acetaldehyde Concentration by Season (A2TX-EPTX)  	3-50
3-3 Ib Average Acetaldehyde Concentration by Season (G2CO-YFMI)	3-51
3-32a Average Acetone Concentration by Season (A2TX-EPTX)	3-52
3-32b Average Acetone Concentration by Season (G2CO-YFMI) 	3-53
3-33a Average Acetylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)	3-54
3-33b Average Acetylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)	3-55
3-34a Average Benzene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMSI)  	3-56
3-34b Average Benzene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI) 	3-57
3-35a Average Chloromethane Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)  	3-58
3-35b Average Chloromethane Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)	3-59
                                         vn

-------
                           LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
                                                                                age
3-36a Average Dichlorodifluoromethane Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)  	3-60
3-36b Average Dichlorodifluoromethane Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)	3-61
3-37a Average Ethylbenzene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)	3-62
3-37b Average Ethylbenzene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI) 	3-63
3-38a Average Formaldehyde Concentration by Season (A2TX-GSCO)  	3-64
3-38b Average Formaldehyde Concentration by Season (GPMS-YFMI)  	3-65
3-39a Average m-, p- Xylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)	3-66
3-39b Average m-, p- Xylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI) 	3-67
3-40a Average Methyl Ethyl Ketone Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)	3-68
3-40b Average Methyl Ethyl Ketone Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)  	3-69
3-4la Average Methylene Chloride Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)	3-70
3-41b Average Methylene Chloride Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)  	3-71
3-42a Average o-Xylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)  	3-72
3-42b Average o-Xylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)	3-73
3-43a Average Propylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)	3-74
3-43b Average Propylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)	3-75
3-44a Average Toluene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS) 	3-76
3-44b Average Toluene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)	3-77
4-1   Phoenix, AZ Site  1 (PSAZ) Monitoring Station	4-4
4-2   Phoenix, AZ Site 2 (QUAZ) Monitoring Station	4-5
4-3   Phoenix, AZ Site  1 (PSAZ) Monitoring Station	4-6
4-4   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SPAZ-PSAZ	4-7
4-5   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of QVAZ  	4-8
5-1   Denver, CO (DECO) Monitoring Station	5-4
5-2   Grand Junction, CO Site 1 (G2CO) Monitoring Station	5-5
5-3   Grand Junction, CO Site 2 (GJCO) Monitoring Station	5-6
5-4   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DECO	5-7
5-5   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of G2CO and GJCO	5-8
6-1   St. Petersburg, FL (AZFL) Monitoring Station 	6-4
6-2   St. Petersburg, FL Site 2 (DNFL) Monitoring Station	6-5
6-3   St. Petersburg, FL Site 3 (ELFL) Monitoring Station  	6-6
6-4   Tampa, FL Site 1 (GAFL) Monitoring Station	6-7
6-5   Tampa, FL Site 2 (GAFL) Monitoring Station	6-8
6-6   Tampa, FL Site 3 (GAFL) Monitoring Station	6-9
6-7   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of AZFL, DNFL, ELFL, GAFL,
      LEFL, and SIFL  	 6-10
7-1   Cedar Rapids, IA  Site 1 (C2IA) Monitoring Station  	7-6
7-2   Clinton, IA Site (CLIA) Monitoring Station	7-7
7-3   Cedar Rapids, IA  Site 2 (CRIA) Monitoring Station  	7-8
7-4   Davenport, IA (DAIA) Monitoring  Station 	7-9
7-5   Des Moines, IA (DMIA) Monitoring Station	7-10
7-6   Muscatine, IA (MUIA) Monitoring Station 	7-11
7-7   Facilities Located within 10 Miles of C2A and CRIA	7-12
                                        Vlll

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
                                                                                    age
7-8   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CLIA  	7-13
7-9   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DAIA	7-14
7-10  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DMIA	7-15
7-11  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of MUIA	7-16
8-1   Detroit, MI Site 1 (APMI) Monitoring Station	8-5
8-2   Detroit, MI Site 2 (DEMI) Monitoring Station	8-6
8-3   Detroit, MI Site 3 (ETMI) Monitoring Station	8-7
8-4   Detroit, MI Site 4 (LOMI) Monitoring Station	8-8
8-5   Detroit, MI Site 5 (RRMI) Monitoring Station	8-9
8-6   Detroit, MI Site 6 (SWMI) Monitoring Station  	8-10
8-7   Detroit, MI Site 7 (YFMI) Monitoring Station	8-11
8-8   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of APMI/DEMI/RRMI/SWMI/YFMI  	8-12
8-9   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of ETMI and LOMI 	8-13
9-1   Gulfport, MS GPMS Monitoring Station	9-4
9-2   Jackson, MS JAMS Monitoring Station	9-5
9-3   Pascagoula, MS PGMS Monitoring Station	9-6
9-4   Tupelo, MS TUMS Monitoring Station 	9-7
9-5   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of GPMS	9-8
9-6   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of JAMS	9-9
9-7   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of PGMS	9-10
9-8   Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of TUMS  	9-11
10-1  St. Louis, MO Monitoring Station  	10-4
10-2  St. Louis, MO (S2MO) Monitoring Station 	10-5
10-3  St. Louis, MO (S3MO) Monitoring Station 	10-6
10-4  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of S2MO/S3MO/SLMO	10-7
11-1  Camden, NJ (CANJ) Monitoring Station	11-5
11-2  Chester, NJ (CHNJ) Monitoring Station	11-6
11-3  Elizabeth, NJ (ELNJ) Monitoring Station	11-7
11-4  New Brunswick, NJ (NBNJ) Monitoring Station	11-8
11-5  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of ELNJ and NBNJ  	11-9
11-6  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CHNJ	11-10
11-7  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CANJ	11-11
12-1  Beulah, ND (BUND) Monitoring Station	12-4
12-2  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of BUND  	12-5
13-1  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of BAPR	13-4
13-2  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SJPR	13-5
14-1  Sioux Falls, SD (SFSD) Monitoring Station	14-4
15-1  Arlington, TX (A2TX) Monitoring Station  	15-4
15-2  El Paso, TX (EPTX) Monitoring Station  	15-5
15-3  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of A2TX	15-6
15-4  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of EPTX	15-7
16-1  Salt Lake City, UT (SLCU) Monitoring Station	16-4
16-2  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SLCU	16-5
                                           IX

-------
                                  LIST OF TABLES

                                                                                 Page

1-1   Organization of the 2001 UATMP Report	1-3

2-1   Monitoring Station Past Participation in the UATMP  	2-13
2-2   Text Descriptions of the 2001 UATMP Monitoring Locations 	2-14
2-3   Site Descriptions for the 2001 UATMP Monitoring Stations 	2-25
2-4   VOC Method Detection Limits	2-29
2-5   SNMOC Method Detection Limits	2-31
2-6   Carbonyl Method Detection Limits  	2-33
2-7   Semivolatile Organic Compound Method Detection Limits  	2-34
2-8   Sampling Schedules and Completeness  	2-36

3-1   Sampling Detect Summaries of the VOC Concentrations  	3-78
3-2   Sampling Detect Summaries of the Carbonyl Concentrations	3-81
3-3   Range of Detectable Values by Site	3-82
3-4   Geometric Means by Site  	3-83
3-5   Summary of Pearson Correlations  for Selected Meteorological Parameters and Prevalent
      Compounds	3-85
3-6   Summary of Mobile Information by Site  	3-86

4-1   Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for AZ Sites  	4-9
4-2a  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Supersite in Phoenix, Arizona (PSAZ)   	4-10
4-2b  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Queen Valley in Phoenix, Arizona (QVAZ)   	4-11
4-2c  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at South Phoenix, Arizona (SPAZ)  	4-12
4-3   Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for AZ Monitoring Sites  	4-13

5-1   Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Colorado  	5-9
5-2a  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Denver, Colorado (DECO)	5-10
5-2b  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Grand Junction, Colorado Site 2 (G2CO)  	5-11
5-2c  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Grand Junction, Colorado Site 1 (GJCO)  	5-12
5-3   TNMOC Measured by the Denver, CO (DECO) Monitoring Station  	5-13
5-4   Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Colorado Monitoring Sites  . 5-14

6-1   Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Florida	6-11
6-2a  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Azalea Park in St. Petersburg, Florida (AZFL)  	6-12

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
                                                                                  age
6-2b  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Dunedin in St. Petersburg, Floirda (DNFL) 	6-13
6-2c  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at East Lake in St. Petersburg, Florida (ELFL)	6-14
6-2d  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Gandy in Tampa, Florida (GAFL)  	6-15
6-2e  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Lewis in Tampa, Florida (LEFL)  	6-16
6-2f  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Simmons in Tampa, Florida  (SIFL)   	6-17
6-3   Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Florida Monitoring Sites  ... 6-18

7-1   Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Iowa	7-17
7-2a  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Cedar Rapids, Iowa (C2IA)  	7-18
7-2b  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Clinton, Iowa (CLIA)  	7-19
7-2c  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Cedar Rapids, Iowa Site 1 (CRIA) 	7-20
7-2d  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Davenport, Iowa (DAIA)  	7-21
7-2e  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Des Moines, Iowa (DMIA)  	7-22
7-2f  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Muscatine, Iowa Site 1 (MUIA)  	7-23
7-3   TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Iowa Monitoring Stations 	7-24
7-4   Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Iowa Monitoring Sites	7-25

8-1   Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Michigan  	8-14
8-2a  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Allen Park in Detroit, Michigan (APMI)  	8-15
8-2b  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Dearborn, Michigan (DEMI)  	8-16
8-2c  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Lodge in Detroit, Michigan (LOMI)   	8-17
8-2d  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at River Rouge in Detroit, Michigan (RRMI)  	8-18
8-2e  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Yellow Freight, Michigan (YFMI) 	8-19
8-3   SVOC and Ozone Measured by the Michigan Monitoring Stations	8-20
8-4   Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Michigan Monitoring Sites  . 8-21
                                          XI

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
                                                                                   age
9-1   Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Mississippi .... 9-12
9-2a  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Gulf Port, Mississippi (GPMS)   	9-13
9-2b  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Jackson, Mississippi (JAMS) 	9-14
9-2c  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Pascagoula, Mississippi (PGMS)  	9-15
9-2d  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Tupelo, Mississippi (TUMS) 	9-16
9-3   Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Mississippi Monitoring Sites 9-17

10-1  Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Missouri	10-8
10-2a Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at St. Louis, Missouri Site 2 (S2MO)	10-9
10-2b Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at St. Louis, Missouri Site 3 (S3MO)	10-10
10-2c Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at St. Louis, Missouri Site 1 (SLMO)  	10-11
10-3  SVOC and SNMOC Measured by the St. Louis, Missouri (SLMO) Monitoring
      Station	10-12
10-4  Motor Vehicle Information vs Daily Concentration for Missouri Monitoring Sites  . 10-13

11-1  Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in New Jersey ... 11-12
1 l-2a Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Camden, New Jersey (CANJ)  	11-13
1 l-2b Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Chester, New Jersey (CHNJ) 	11-14
1 l-2c Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Elizabeth, New Jersey (ELNJ) 	11-15
1 l-2d Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at New Brunswick, New Jersey (NBNJ)  	11-16
11-3  SVOC and Ozone Measured by the New Jersey Monitoring Stations	11-17
11-4  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for New Jersey Monitoring Sitesl 1-18

12-1  Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for the Site in North Dakota 12-6
12-2  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Beulah, North Dakota (BUND)  	12-7
12-3  TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Beulah, North Dakota Monitoring Station .... 12-8
12-4  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for the North Dakota
      Monitoring Site	12-9

13-1  Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Puerto Rico ... 13-6
                                          xn

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
                                                                                  age
13-2a Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (BAPR)  	13-7
13-2b Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at San Juan, Puerto Rico (SJPR)  	13-8
13-3  TNMOC Measured by the Puerto Rico Monitoring Station	13-9
13-4  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Puerto Rico Monitoring Sitesl3-10

14-1  Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for the Site in South Dakota  14-6
14-2  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Sioux Falls, South Dakota (SFSD)	14-7
14-3  TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Sioux Falls, SD (SFSD) Monitoring Station . .  14-8
14-4  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for the South Dakota
      Monitoring Site	14-9

15-1  Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Texas 	15-8
15-2a Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Arlington, Texas (A2TX) 	15-9
15-2b Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at El Paso, Texas (EPTX)   	15-10
15-3  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Texas Monitoring Sites ... 15-11

16-1  Average Concentrations and Meteorological Parameters for the Site in Utah	16-6
16-2  Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlation with Selected Meteorological Parameters
      at Salt Lake City, Utah (SLCU)  	16-7
16-3  TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Salt Lake City, UT (SLCU) Monitoring Station 16-8
16-4  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for the Utah Monitoring Site . . .  16-9

17-1  VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 372 Replicates on
      Duplicate Samples	17-10
17-2  VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 104 Replicates on
      Collocated Samples	17-12
17-3  SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 192 Replicates on
      Duplicate Samples	17-14
17-4  Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total  588 Replicates on
      Duplicate Samples	17-17
17-5  Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total  116 Replicates on
      Collocated Samples	17-18
17-6  Semivolatile Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 82 Replicates on
      Collocated Samples	17-19
17-7  Hexavalent Chromium Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 76
      Replicates on Collocated Samples 	17-20
17-8  VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 198 Duplicate Samples	17-21
                                         Xlll

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
                                                                               age
17-9  VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 38 Collocated Samples	17-23
17-10 VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Comparison of Duplicate and Collocated
      Samples - VOC	17-25
17-11 SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 104 Duplicate Samples	17-27
17-12 Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 290 Duplicate Samples  	17-30
17-13 Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 54 Collocated Samples	17-31
17-14 Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Comparison of Duplicate
      and Collocated Samples - Carbonyls 	17-32
17-15 Semivolatile Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 40 Collocated Samples .... 17-33
17-16 Hexavalent Chromium Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 44 Collocated
      Samples	17-34
17-17 Round Robin Analytical Comparisons for Carbonyl Samples	17-35
                                        xiv

-------
                         LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

AIRS        Aerometric Information and Retrieval System
AQS         Air Quality Subsystem (of the Aerometric Information and Retrieval System)
ATSDR      Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
BTEX       benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (o-, TO-, and/?-xylene)
CO          carbon monoxide
DNPH       2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine
EPA         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FC-43        perfluorotributylamine
FID          flame ionization detection
GC          gas chromatography
HPLC        high-performance liquid chromatography
MEK        methyl ethyl ketone
MDL        Method Detection Limit
MS          mass spectrometer
MTBE       methyl tert-butyl ether
NA          not applicable
ND          nondetect
NMOC       Nonmethane Organic Compounds
NOX          oxides of nitrogen
ppbC        parts per billion Carbon
ppbv         parts per billion (by volume)
PM          particulate matter
R^x          maximum radius  of concern
RPD         relative percent difference
SNMOC      Speciated Nonmethane Organic Compound
SVOC       Semivolatile Organic Compounds
TRI          Toxics Release Inventory
UATMP      Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program
VOC        Volatile Organic  Compound(s)
                                       xv

-------
                 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (Continued)
Monitoring Stations
A2TX       Arlington, Texas
APMI       Allen Park in Detroit, Michigan
AZFL       Azalea Park in St. Petersburg, Florida
BAPR       Barceloneta, Puerto Rico
BUND      Beulah, North Dakota
C2IA       Cedar Rapids, Iowa (Site #2)
CANJ       Camden, New Jersey
CHNJ       Chester, New Jersey
CLIA       Clinton, Iowa
CRIA       Cedar Rapids, Iowa (Site #1)
DAIA       Davenport, Iowa
DECO       Denver, Colorado
DEMI       Dearborn in Detroit, Michigan
DMIA       Des Moines, Iowa
DNFL       Dunedin in St. Petersburg, Florida
E7MI       E7 Mile in Detroit, Michigan
ELFL       East Lake in St. Petersburg, Florida
ELNJ       Elizabeth, New Jersey
EPTX       El Paso, Texas
G2CO       Grand Junction, Colorado (Site #2)
GAFL       Gandy in Tampa, Florida
GJCO       Grand Junction, Colorado (Site #1)
GPMS       Gulf Port, Mississippi
JAMS       Jackson, Mississippi
LEFL       Lewis in Tampa, Florida
LOMI       Lodge in Detroit, Michigan
MUIA       Muscatine, Iowa
NBNJ       New Brunswick, New Jersey
PGMS       Pascagoula, Mississippi
PSAZ       Supers!te in Phoenix, Arizona
QVAZ       Queen Valley in Phoenix, Arizona
RRMI       River Rouge in Detroit, Michigan
S2MO       St. Louis, Missouri (Site #2)
S3MO       St. Louis, Missouri (Site #3)
SFSD       Sioux Falls, South Dakota
                                      xvi

-------
                LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (Continued)

SIFL        Simmons in Tampa, Florida
SJPR        San Juan, Puerto Rico
SLCU       Salt Lake City, Utah
SLMO       St. Louis, Missouri (Site #1)
SPAZ       South Phoenix, Arizona
SWMI       South West High School in Detroit, Michigan
TUMS       Tupelo, Mississippi
YFMI       Yellow Freight in Detroit, Michigan
                                    xvn

-------
                                Executive Summary
      This report presents the results and conclusions from the ambient air monitoring conducted
as part of the 2001 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP)—a program designed to
characterize the magnitude and composition of potentially toxic air pollution in, or near, urban
locations. The 2001 UATMP included 43 monitoring stations that collected 24-hour air samples,
typically on a 6- or 12-day schedule. Twenty-nine sites analyzed ambient air samples for
concentrations of 59 volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 16 carbonyl compounds. Thirteen
sites also analyzed for 80 speciated nonmethane organic compounds (SNMOC).  Twelve sites
analyzed for the VOC, carbonyl compounds, and 92 semivolatile compounds (SVOC). Overall,
nearly 230,000 ambient air concentrations were measured during the 2001 UATMP.  The
summary presented in this report uses various graphical, numerical, and statistical analyses to put
the vast amount of ambient air monitoring data collected into perspective.

      Not surprisingly, the ambient air concentrations measured during the program varied
significantly from city to city and from season to season. This report describes and interprets
these spatial and temporal variations separately for halogenated hydrocarbons, hydrocarbons,
polar compounds, and carbonyls.

      The ambient air monitoring data collected during the 2001 UATMP serve a wide range of
purposes. Not only do these data characterize the nature and extent of urban air pollution close to
the 43 monitoring stations participating in this study, but they also indicate some trends and
patterns that may be common to all urban environments. Therefore, this report presents some
results that are specific to particular monitoring locations and presents other results that are
apparently common to urban environments. These results should ultimately provide additional
insight into the complex nature of urban air pollution.  The final data are also included in the
appendices to this report.
                                          xvin

-------
1.0    Introduction
       Air pollution in urban locations contains many components that originate from a wide
range of industrial, motor vehicle, and natural emissions sources. Because some of these
components include toxic compounds known or suspected to be carcinogenic, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to encourage state and local agencies to
understand and appreciate the nature and extent of potentially toxic air pollution in urban
locations.  To achieve this goal, EPA sponsors the Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program
(UATMP), a program designed to characterize the composition and magnitude of urban air
pollution through extensive ambient air monitoring.  Since the inception of the UATMP in 1987,
many environmental and health agencies have participated in the UATMP to assess the causes
and effects of air pollution within their jurisdictions. This report summarizes and interprets the
2001 UATMP monitoring effort, which included 12 months of six- and twelve-day
measurements of ambient air quality at 43 monitoring sites in or near 27 urban locations.  An
additional  site (E7MI) did not measure either VOCs or carbonyls but semivolatile compounds
which are  included in this report.  Much of the analysis and data interpretation in this report
focuses on compound-specific data trends.
 Note:  In previous years, the UATMP sampling typically began in September and ended in
        August of the following calendar year. Last year, the sampling began anywhere from
        August to December 1999 and ERG ended all sampling at the end of December 2000.
        That "program year" was therefore assigned as UATMP 1999/2000.  This program
        year consists of sampling for only the 2001 calendar year, and is referred to as
        UATMP 2001. The following years will be named in accordance with the year
        sampling was initiated (i.e., UATMP 2002, UATMP 2003, etc.).
       The contents of this report provide both a qualitative overview of air pollution at selected
urban locations and a quantitative analysis of the factors that appear to affect urban air quality
most significantly.  This report also focuses on data trends at each of the 43 different air sampling
locations, a site-specific approach that allows for much more detailed analyses of the factors
                                          1-1

-------
(e.g., motor vehicle emission sources, industrial sources, natural sources) that affect air quality
differently from one urban center to the next.

       Ultimately, the contents of this report should offer participating agencies useful insights
into important air quality issues. For example, participating agencies can use trends and patterns
in the UATMP monitoring data to determine whether levels of air pollution present public health
concerns, to identify which emissions sources contribute most strongly to air pollution, or to
forecast whether proposed pollution control initiatives might significantly improve air quality.
Recently, EPA has been actively participating in the National-scale Air Toxics Assessment
(NATA) which uses air toxic emissions to model ambient monitoring concentrations across the
nation. UATMP monitoring data may be used to compare the modeling results. Though they are
extensive, the analyses in this report should not be viewed as a comprehensive account of urban
air pollution at every UATMP monitoring station. State and local environmental agencies are
encouraged to perform additional analyses of the monitoring data so that the many factors that
affect ambient air quality can be appreciated fully.

       To facilitate examination of the 2001 UATMP monitoring data, the complete set of
measured concentrations is presented in appendices of this report. In addition, these data are
publicly available in electronic format from the Air Quality Subsystem (AQS) of EPA's
Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/.

       The remainder of this report is organized into nineteen text sections and sixteen
appendices. Table 1-1 highlights the contents of each section. As with previous UATMP annual
reports, all figures and tables in this report appear at the end of their respective sections (figures
first, followed by tables).
                                           1-2

-------
                                                        Table 1-1
                                        Organization of the 2001 UATMP Report
Report
Section
            Section Title
Overview of Contents
          The 2001 UATMP
                                      This section provides background information on the scope of the 2001 UATMP and
                                      includes information about the:
                                      •  Monitoring locations
                                      •  Compounds selected for monitoring
                                         Sampling and analytical methods
                                      •  Sampling schedules
                                         Completeness of the air monitoring program.
          Overview of Compounds
                                      These sections present and discuss significant trends and relationships in the UATMP
                                      data. These sections characterize how ambient air concentrations varied with
                                      monitoring location and with time, then interpret the significance of the observed
                                      spatial and temporal variations.
  10
          Monitoring results for Phoenix, AZ
          (PSAZ, QVAZ, and SPAZ)
          Monitoring results for Denver (DECO)
          and Grand Junction, CO (G2CO and
          GJCO)
          Monitoring results for St. Petersburg
          (AZFL, DNFL, and ELFL) and Tampa,
          FL (GAFL, LEFL, and SIFL)
          Monitoring results for Cedar Rapids
          (C2IA and CRIA), Clinton (CLIA),
          Davenport (DAIA), Des Moines (DMIA),
          and Muscatine, IA (MUIA)
                                      These sections summarize the 2001 UATMP monitoring data collected in the
                                      respective cities and analyze in detail ambient air concentrations of selected nitriles
                                      and oxygenated compounds.
          Monitoring results for Detroit, MI
          (APMI, DEMI, E7MI, LOMI, RRMI,
          SWMI, and YFMI)
          Monitoring results for St. Louis, MO
          (S2MO, S3MO, and SLMO)
Monitoring results for Gulfport (GPMS),
Jackson (JAMS), Pascagoula (PGMS),
and Tupelo, MS (TUMS)

-------
Table 1-1. (Continued)
Report
Section
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Section Title
Monitoring results for Beulah, ND
(BUND)
Monitoring results for Camden (CANJ),
Chester (CHNJ), Elizabeth (ELNJ), and
New Brunswick, NJ (NBNJ)
Monitoring results for Barceloneta
(BAPR) and San Juan, PR (SJPR)
Monitoring results for Sioux Falls, SD
(SFSD)
Monitoring results for Arlington (A2TX)
and El Paso, TX (EPTX)
Monitoring results for Salt Lake City, UT
(SLCU)
Data Quality
Conclusions and Recommendations
References
Overview of Contents
These sections summarize the 2001 UATMP monitoring dat
respective cities and analyze in detail ambient air concentrat
and oxygenated compounds.
This section defines and discusses the concepts of precision
quantitative and qualitative analyses, this section comments
accuracy of the 2001 UATMP ambient air monitoring data.
a collected in the
ions of selected nitriles
and accuracy. Based on
on the precision and
This section summarizes the most significant findings of the report and makes several
recommendations for future projects that will involve ambient air monitoring in urban
locations.
This section lists the references cited throughout the report.

-------
2.0    The 2001 UATMP
       The 2001 UATMP included 43 monitoring stations that collected 24-hour integrated
canister and cartridge samples of ambient air for up to 12 months at six and twelve day sampling
periods (some sites chose to sample on one- or three-day intervals). These samples were
analyzed in a central laboratory for concentrations of selected hydrocarbons, halogenated
hydrocarbons, and polar compounds from the canister samples, carbonyl compounds from the
cartridge samples, and semivolatiles from the XAD-2® thimbles. The following discussion
reviews the monitoring locations, the compounds selected for monitoring, the sampling
schedules, the completeness of the 2001 UATMP, and the sampling and analytical methods.

2.1    Monitoring Locations
       Although EPA sponsors the UATMP, EPA does not dictate where the UATMP
monitoring stations are located.  Rather, representatives from the state and local agencies that
voluntarily participate in the program and contribute to the overall  monitoring costs select the
monitoring locations.  Some monitors were placed near the centers of heavily populated cities
(e.g., Denver and Phoenix), while others were placed in moderately populated areas (e.g., Beulah
and Des Moines). The monitoring stations participating in the UATMP program are listed in
Table 2-1.

       Figure 2-1 shows the 27 cities participating in the 2001 program. The site descriptions in
Table 2-2 and in Appendix A provide detailed information on the surroundings at the 2001
UATMP monitoring locations. Sections 4 through 16 contain topographic maps for each of the
sites.  Industrial facilities within 10 miles of the monitoring sites were plotted in these sections,
as well. The locations and category descriptions of these industrial sites were report in the 1999
National Emission Inventory (NET) (EPA, 2001).

       As Figure 2-1 shows, the 2001 UATMP monitoring sites were distributed across the
country.  The monitoring data from these stations may indicate certain air quality trends that are
                                           2-1

-------
common to all urban environments. The analyses in this report differentiate those trends that
appear to be site-specific from those that appear to be common to urban environments.

       Chemical concentrations measured during the 2001 UATMP varied significantly from
monitoring location to monitoring location.  As discussed throughout this report, the proximity
of the monitoring locations to different emissions sources, especially industrial facilities and
heavily traveled roadways, often explains the observed spatial variations in ambient air quality.
To provide a first approximation of the respective contributions of motor vehicle emissions and
industrial emissions on ambient air quality at each site, Table 2-3 lists the number of people
living within 10 miles of each monitoring location, as well as the number of industrial facilities
in the 1999NEI.

       At every UATMP monitoring location, the air sampling equipment was installed in a
small temperature-controlled enclosure (usually a trailer or a shed) with the sampling inlet probe
protruding through the roof. With this common setup, every UATMP monitor sampled ambient
air at heights approximately 5 to 20 feet above local ground level.

       For record keeping and reporting purposes, each of these locations was assigned:
       A unique four-character UATMP site code - used to track samples from the monitoring
       locations to the laboratory; and
       A unique nine-digit AIRS site code - used to index monitoring results in the AIRS
       database.
This report often cites these codes when presenting selected monitoring results.
                                           2-2

-------
2.2    Compounds Selected for Monitoring
       Urban air pollution typically contains hundreds of components, including, but not limited
to, volatile organic compounds (VOC), metals, inorganic acids, and particulate matter.  Because
sampling and analysis to monitor for every component of air pollution has been prohibitively
expensive, the UATMP instead focuses on measuring ambient levels of 59 VOC
(13 hydrocarbons, 37 halogenated hydrocarbons, and 9 polar compounds), 15 carbonyl
compounds, 80 Speciated Nonmethane Organic Compounds (SNMOC),  and 91 Semivolatile
Compounds (SVOC). Tables 2-4, 2-5, 2-6, and 2-7 identify the specific  compounds of interest.

2.3    Sampling Schedules
       Table 2-8 presents the dates on which sampling began and ended for each monitoring
location.  With the following exceptions, the monitoring locations started the 2001 UATMP
sampling in January 2001 and stopped sampling in December 2001. The following sites did not
start at the beginning of the sampling period because the monitoring stations were not ready:

       Detroit, Michigan sites (Allen Park, Dearborn, River Rouge, Yellow Freight, Lodge)
       started in April 2001;
•      Grand Junction,  Colorado sites (1 and 2) started in May 2001;
•      Jackson, Mississippi site started in May 2001;
•      St. Louis, Missouri sites (1,2, and 3) started in May 2001;
•      Chester and New Brunswick, New Jersey sites started in May 2001;
•      Barceloneta and San Juan, Puerto Rico sites started in May 2001;
•      Phoenix, Arizona sites (supersite and Queen Valley) started in June 2001;
•      Tupelo and Pascagoula, Mississippi sites started sampling in July 2001;
•      South Phoenix, Arizona site started in August 2001; and
•      Gulf Port, Mississippi site started in August 2001.
                                          2-3

-------
       Four sites ended sampling before December 2001: Clinton and Muscatine, Iowa finished
in October; Des Moines, Iowa finished in November; and Arlington, Texas finished in July.
One site, South West High School in Detroit, Michigan had only one sample in May.

       According to the UATMP schedule, 24-hour integrated samples were to be collected at
every monitoring location once every 6 or 12 days and each sample collection began and ended at
midnight, local standard time. At each test site, VOC and carbonyl samples were collected
concurrently, except for: St. Petersburg, Florida (Azalea Park, Dunedin, and East Lake); Tampa,
Florida (Gandy, Lewis and Simmons); South West High School in Detroit, Michigan; Jackson
Mississippi; St. Louis sites 1 and 2; and the Phoenix sites  South Phoenix, Supersite, and Queen
Valley.  The following sites also collected SNMOC samples:

•      Barceloneta, Puerto Rico;
•      Beulah, North Dakota;
•      Cedar Rapids (1 and 2), Iowa;
•      Clinton, Iowa;
•      Davenport, Iowa;
•      Denver, Colorado;
•      Des Moines, Iowa;
•      Muscatine, Iowa;
•      Salt Lake City, Utah;
•      San Juan, Puerto Rico;
•      Sioux Falls, South Dakota; and
•      St. Louis (Site 1), Missouri.
                                          2-4

-------
Twelve sites collected SVOC samples:

•      All Detroit, Michigan sites (Azalea Park, Dearborn, E7 Mile, Lodge, River Rouge, South
       West High School, and Yellow Freight);
•      All New Jersey sites (Chester, Elizabeth, New Brunswick, and Camden); and
•      St. Louis (Site 1), Missouri.

       As part of the sampling schedule, site operators were instructed to collect duplicate
samples on roughly 10 percent of the sampling days. Sampling calendars were distributed to
help site operators schedule the collection of samples, duplicates, and field blanks. In cases
where monitors failed to collect valid samples on a scheduled sampling day, site operators
sometimes rescheduled samples for other days. This practice explains why some monitoring
locations periodically strayed from the 6- or 12-day sampling schedule.  The state of Michigan
prepared a schedule that allowed the Michigan's Department of Environmental Quality's
laboratory to share samples with ERG's laboratory.

       The 6- or 12-day sampling schedule permits cost-effective data collection for
characterization (annual-average concentrations) of toxic compounds in ambient air and ensures
that sampling days are evenly distributed among the 7 days of the week to allow comparison of
air quality on weekdays to air quality on weekends.

2.4    Completeness
       Completeness refers to the number of valid samples collected compared to the number of
samples expected from a 6-  or 12-day sampling cycle. Monitoring programs that consistently
generate valid results have higher completeness than programs that consistently invalidate
samples.  The completeness of an air monitoring program, therefore, is a qualitative measure of
the reliability of air sampling equipment and laboratory analytical equipment and a measure of
the efficiency with which the program was managed.
                                          2-5

-------
       Appendix B identifies samples that were invalidated and list the specific reasons why the
samples were invalidated.  Table 2-8 summarizes the completeness of the VOC and carbonyl
data sets collected during the 2001 UATMP:
       For VOC sampling, the completeness ranged from 82 to 100 percent, with an overall
       completeness of 99 percent.
       For carbonyl sampling, the completeness ranged from 80 to 100 percent with an overall
       completeness of 98 percent.
       For SNMOC sampling, the completeness was 100 percent for all sites.
       For SVOC sampling, the completeness ranged from 71 to 100 percent with an overall
       completeness of 90 percent.
       The UATMP data quality objectives are based on the 2001 Quality Assurance Plan,
85-100% completeness for a given monitoring station must be analyzed successfully to generate
a sufficiently complete data set for estimating annual average air concentrations. The data in
Table 2-8 show that 6 data sets (from a total of 96 data sets) from the 2001 UATMP monitoring
stations did not meet this data quality objective.  Twenty-four sites which measured carbonyls
(out of 36 sites), 30 VOC sites (out of 35), 13 SMOC sites (out of 13), and 3 SVOC sites (out of
12) achieved 100% completeness.

2.5    Sampling and Analytical Methods
       During the 2001 UATMP, three EPA-approved methods were used to characterize urban
air pollution:
       Compendium Method TO-15 was used to measure ambient air concentrations of 59 VOC
       and 80 SNMOC;
       Compendium Method TO-11A was used to measure ambient air concentrations of
       15 carbonyl compounds; and
                                         2-6

-------
•      Compendium Method TO-13A was used to collect ambient air concentrations of 91
       SVOC. Analysis was performed following SW846, Method 8270 protocols.
       The following discussion presents an overview of these sampling and analytical methods.
For detailed descriptions of the methods, readers should refer to EPA's original documentation of
the Compendium Methods (USEPA, 1999a).

       2.5.1  VOC Sampling and Analytical Method
       As specified in the EPA method, ambient air samples for VOC analysis were collected in
passivated stainless steel canisters. The central laboratory distributed the prepared (i.e., cleaned
and evacuated) canisters to the UATMP monitoring stations before each scheduled sampling
event, and site operators connected the canisters to air sampling equipment prior to each
sampling day. Before their use in the field, the passivated canisters had internal sea level
pressures much lower than atmospheric. Because of this sea level pressure differential, ambient
air naturally flowed into the canisters once they were opened, and pumps were not needed to
collect ambient air for VOC analysis. A flow controller on the sampling device ensured that
ambient air entered the canister at a constant rate across the collection period. At the end of the
24-hour sampling period, a solenoid valve automatically stopped  ambient air from flowing into
the canister, and site operators returned the canisters to the central laboratory for analysis.

       By analyzing each sample with gas chromatography incorporating mass selective
detection and flame ionization detection (GC/MS-FID), laboratory staff determined ambient air
concentrations of 59 VOC (13 hydrocarbons, 37 halogenated hydrocarbons, and 9 polar
compounds) and 80 SNMOC within the sample. Because isobutene and 1-butene as well asm-
xylene and/>-xylene elute from the GC column at the same time, the VOC analytical method
reports only the sum of the concentrations for these compounds, and not the separate
concentrations for each compound.

       Table 2-4 lists the method detection limits for the laboratory analysis of the VOC samples
and Table 2-6 lists the method detection limits for the SNMOC samples.  Although the
                                          2-7

-------
sensitivity of the analytical method varies from compound to compound, the detection limit for
VOC reported for every compound is lower than 0.25 parts per billion by volume (ppbv); most of
the detection limits were below 0.1 ppbv. For the SNMOC the detection limits reported for
every compound are lower than VOC detection limits, ranging from 0.03 to 0.16 ppbv.
Speciated Nonmethane Organic Compound (SNMOC) detection limits are expressed in parts per
billion Carbon (ppbC) as well as ppbv.

      Because nondetect results significantly limit the range of data interpretations for ambient
air monitoring programs, participating agencies should note that the approach for treating
nondetects may slightly affect the magnitude of the calculated central tendency concentrations,
especially for compounds with a low prevalence. Following the approach used to process the
1995 - 2000 UATMP monitoring data, data analysts replaced all nondetect observations with
concentrations equal to one-half of the compound's corresponding method detection limit. This
is the approach recommended for risk assessments involving environmental monitoring data
(USEPA, 1988).

      This year, the reportable SNMOC analysis option was combined with the  standard VOC
sampling. Data analysis has begun for the SNMOC sites where data were collected. These data
are presented in Appendix D, with the VOC data. Table 2-5 lists the method detection limits for
the laboratory analysis of the SNMOC samples.

      2.5.2  Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Method
      Following the specifications of EPA Compendium Method TO-11 A, ambient air samples
for carbonyl analysis were collected by passing ambient air over silica gel cartridges coated with
2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), a compound known  to react selectively and  reversibly with
many aldehydes and ketones. Carbonyl compounds in ambient air remain within  the sampling
cartridge, while other compounds pass through the cartridge without reacting with the DNPH-
coated matrix. As with the VOC sampling, the central laboratory distributed the silica gel
cartridges to the monitoring locations, and site operators connected the cartridges to the air
                                          2-8

-------
sampling equipment. After each 24-hour sampling period, site operators returned the cartridges

to the central laboratory for chemical analysis.


       To quantify concentrations of carbonyls in the sampled ambient air, laboratory analysts

eluted the exposed silica gel cartridges with acetonitrile. This solvent elution liberated a solution

of DNPH derivatives of the aldehydes and ketones collected from the ambient air. High-

performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis and ultraviolet detection of these solutions

determined the relative amounts of individual carbonyls present in the original air sample.

Because butyraldehyde and isobutyraldehyde elute from the HPLC column at the same time, the

carbonyl  analytical method can report only the sum of the concentrations for these compounds,

and not the separate concentrations for each compound. For the same reason, the analytical

method reports only the sum of the concentrations for the three tolualdehyde isomers, as opposed

to reporting separate concentrations for the three individual compounds.
 Appreciating Detection Limits

 The detection limit of an analytical method must be considered carefully when interpreting
 the corresponding ambient air monitoring data. By definition, detection limits represent the
 lowest concentrations at which laboratory equipment can reliably quantify concentrations of
 selected compounds to a specific confidence level. If a chemical concentration in ambient air
 does not exceed the method sensitivity (as gauged by the detection limit), the analytical
 method might not differentiate the compound from other compounds in the sample or from
 the random "noise" inherent in laboratory analyses. Therefore, when samples contain
 concentrations at levels below their respective detection limits, multiple analyses of the same
 sample may lead to a wide range of results, including highly variable concentrations or
 "nondetect" observations.  Because analytical methods do not quantify concentrations at
 levels below the detection limits accurately or precisely, data analysts must exercise caution
 when interpreting monitoring data with many reported concentrations at levels near or
 below the corresponding detection limits.
       Method detection limits are performed at the analytical laboratory by analyzing up to 9

replicate standards spiked on to the appropriate sample media (per analytical method).
                                           2-9

-------
Instrument detection limits are not determined (9 replicates of standards only) because it does not
take into account sample preparation.

       Table 2-6 lists the detection limits reported by the analytical laboratory for measuring
concentrations of 14 carbonyl compounds. Although the sensitivity of the analytical method
varies from compound to compound, the detection limit reported by the analytical laboratory for
every compound is less than or equal to 0.026 ppbv.  Carbonyl detection limits ranged from
0.003 to 0.026 ppbv.

       When reviewing these data, readers should keep in mind that data analysts replaced all
nondetect observations with concentrations equal to one-half of the compound's corresponding
detection limit.

       2.5.3   Semivolatile Sampling and Analytical Method
       Semivolatile sampling is performed completely by the sites in accordance with EPA
Compendium Method TO-13 A. ERG receives the samples from the sites for analysis only.
Sampling modules containing XAD-2® and petri dishes containing filters, together with Chain of
Custody forms and all associated documentation, are shipped to the ERG laboratory from the
field. Upon receipt at the laboratory, sample preparation and analysis procedures are based on
SW-846 Method 3542 and SW-846 Method 8270.

       The samples are extracted with methylene chloride using  a large Soxhlet extractor. After
extraction, the sample is  concentrated to 2 mL. The samples are  placed in storage at 4°C until
analysis.  Sample extracts will be  analyzed for Semivolatile organic compounds using the
analytical procedures of SW-846 Method 8270.  The mass spectrometer is tuned and masses
calibrated as required using perfluorotributylamine (FC-43), as per the manufacturer's
instructions.
                                          2-10

-------
       Method 8270 calibration procedures and criteria apply. Calibration check compounds
and system performance check compounds must meet the criteria outlined in Method 8270. A
solvent blank is analyzed prior to sample analysis to demonstrate that the analytical system is free
from contamination. Internal standard area counts for each sample analysis must be between 50
and 150% of the last daily calibration standard, in accordance with Method 8270 specifications.

       Criteria for identification of the mass spectra of the compounds of interest are positive
matching of the relative retention times and the mass spectra of the sample and the standard
components in accordance with the specifications of Method 8270. Quantitative analysis is
achieved by the use of automated procedures in the Hewlett-Packard data system.
                                          2-11

-------
                                 Figure 2-1.  Cities Participating in the 2001 Program
to


to
                                         Muscatine, IA x   Davenport, IA


                                Cedar Rapids, IA
                              Beulah,ND




                 Salt/Lake City, JUT
                                    SiouwFalls, SD
                                         es Moines, IA
                                                               St.ULouS, MO
            GrandXj unction, CO
                                       Denver, CO
upelo, M

  ^Y
  JacKson,


    Pasfcagoula! MS
                                       Arlington, TX
       Phoenix, AZ
                      EIPaso,TX
                            Chester, NJ


                             Elizabeth, NJ


                             New Brunswick, NJ


                          Camden, NJ
                                                          Gulf Port, MS


                                                           St. Petersburg, FL
                                                                                   Tampa, FL
                                                                                                 San Juan, PR
                                                                                            Barceloneta, PR

-------
               Table 2-1.  Monitoring Station Past Participation in the UATMP
Monitoring Station
Arlington, TX (A2TX)
Beulah, ND (BUND)
Camden, NJ (CANJ)
Cedar Rapids, IA (CRIA)
Clinton, IA (CLIA)
Davenport, IA (DAIA)
Denver, CO (DECO)
Des Moines, IA (DMIA)
Elizabeth, NJ (ELNJ)
El Paso, TX (EPTX)
Muscatine, IA (MUIA)
Salt Lake City, UT (SLCU)
Sioux Falls, SD (SFSD)
Program Years During Which Station Past Participated
in the UATMP
1994


/










1995


/






/



1996


/






/



1997


/






/



1998

/
/






/



1999/
2000
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Note:   Some of the stations shown in the table participated in UATMPs prior to the 1994 program. However, this
        report considers only ambient air monitoring data collected during the current and previous contract
        procurements (i.e., UATMP program years 1994 through 2001).
                                               2-13

-------
                              Table 2-2. Text Descriptions of the 2001 UATMP Monitoring Locations
UATMP
Code
A2TX
APMI
AZFL
BAPR
Monitoring
Location
Arlington, TX
Allen Park,
Detroit, MI
Azalea Park, St.
Petersburg, FL
Barceloneta, PR
Land Use
Residential
Commercial
Residential
Residential
Location
Setting
Urban
Suburban
Suburban
Rural
Estimated
Traffic
17,472
60,000
51,000
10
Traffic
Year
1998
Unknown
Unknown
1994
Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
Arlington, Texas is located in Tarrant County, approximately 20
miles west of Dallas. A roadway that averages more than 17,000
vehicles per day is 73 meters from the site. The monitoring site is
located in a residential and light commercial area of up to one and
a half miles. The monitor itself is located in the TNRCC building
with the probe through the top of the roof, approximately 15 feet
from the ground.
The Allen Park site is an intermediate site located in a residential
neighborhood 300 feet away from Interstate 75. Historically, this
site has been used to detect impacts from mobile sources. There
are no major industrial sources near the site. Of all the
population-oriented sites in the Detroit MSA, it has the highest
PM10 levels. Therefore, it has been selected as the PM25 trend
speciation site and the collocated site for the federal reference
method (FRM) monitors. Other criteria pollutant measurements
that are collected at Allen Park include CO, O3, SO2, and PM10
A neighborhood spatial scale of representativeness characterizes
this monitoring site selected for the Tampa Bay pilot project.
This monitor is sited in an area of high population density with
uniform, mixed land use, consisting of residential, commercial,
and industrial properties. Major point sources are located
approximately 8 to 15 kilometers from the monitoring site. In
addition, this site is at least 150 meters from major roadways.
However, given the proximity of motor vehicle traffic it is
expected that mobile sources will appreciably contribute to the
measured samples.
The Barceloneta site is a residential area surrounded by 5
pharmaceutical plants. The greater area outside the city is rural in
character, and the city itself is within 2 miles of the Atlantic
Ocean.
to

-------
                                                    Table 2-2.  (Continued)
UATMP
Code


BUND


C2IA
CANJ

CHNJ

CLIA

Monitoring
Location


Beulah, ND


Cedar Rapids,
IA (Site #2)
Camden, NJ

Chester, NJ

Clinton, IA

Land Use


Agricultural


Residential
Residential

Agricultural

Residential

Location
Setting


Rural


Urban
Suburban

Rural

Suburban

Estimated
Traffic


1,350


1,500
62,000

12,623

500

Traffic
Year


1998


1994
1986

1995

1997

Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
Beulah, North Dakota, located in Mercer County, is a rural,
agricultural area with primarily wheat, small grains, and cattle
farms. There are six lignite coal-fired power plants within thirty
miles of Beulah, one to the east-southeast; one to the northeast;
two to the east; one to the northwest; and one to the southwest.
There are a petroleum refinery and a lignite coal-fired power plant
fifty miles southeast of Beulah. There is a lignite coal mine
located north of the town, one to the south-southwest of town and
one to the southeast of town. The monitoring station is located in
the approximate area of two coal-fired power plants and a coal
gasification plant (the only functioning one in the nation). There
is one power plant seven miles to the southwest of the monitoring
station; another is six miles to the northwest; and the gasification
plant is five miles to the northwest.
This site is considered an EPA Urban Scale site within residential
population . It is a community wide exposure area where spatial
uniformity in comparison to the CRIA site is important. This site
is located at the Army Reserve Government buliding - on the roof
top with PM2 5 samplers. This site is on the northeast quadrant of
Cedar Rapids.
Although this monitoring site in Camden, NJ is in a residential
area, numerous industrial facilities and busy roadways are located
within a ten mile radius. The monitors are situated in a parking
lot of a business complex.
The Chester, NJ site is located in a rural-agricultural, residential
section of town and is topographically rolling. It is located near
Lucent Laboratory Building #1. There is potential population,
ozone, NO2, and SO2 exposure.
The Clinton, Iowa site, located in Clinton County, is in a
residential section of town. A large grain processing plant is
located two miles to the south. Normal small city traffic patterns
are observed around this site. The site is located only 200 yards
from the Mississippi River.
to

-------
                                                                Table 2-2.  (Continued)
        UATMP
          Code
 Monitoring
   Location
 Land Use
Location
 Setting
Estimated
 Traffic
 Traffic
  Year
                     Description of the
                   Immediate Surroundings
         CRIA
Cedar Rapids,
     IA
 Industrial
 Urban
  15,600
  1999
This site is considered an EPA Middle Scale site within an
industrial and traffic corridor setting, located on a city-owned area
in a southwest quadrant called Hawkeye Downs. The site was set
up for maximum concentration and source oriented.  This site was
set up to compare spatial concentrations and is considered an EPA
Urban toxics site which is more representative of typical
population exposure to levels detected. This site is located in the
southwest quadrant of Cedar Rapids.
         DAIA
Davenport, IA
Residential
 Urban
  1,000
Unknown
The Davenport, Iowa site, located in Scott County, in a
metropolitan area that is approximately 650 yards from the
Mississippi valley, is considered a major residential/general
commercial site. This is a core site for PM2 5 monitoring.  A meat
processing plant, as well as a military manufacturing arsenal, is
within five miles of the sampling site.  An aluminum roll
processing plant is located within 10 miles of the site.
to
         DECO
 Denver, CO
Commercial
 Urban
 44,200
  1995
The Denver site, called the Denver-CAMP site by the State of
Colorado, is on the northern edge of downtown Denver on a small
triangle of land bounded by Broadway, Champa St. and 21st St.
The site was originally established in 1965 as a maximum
concentration site for the Denver downtown area. The site
provides a measure of the air pollution levels to which a large
working population is exposed. Being next to a major road in the
downtown Denver area, the primary influences on the site are
from motor vehicles. There are some industrial facilities to the
north of the site, but no large facilities within a one or two mile
radius. Residential areas are located a quarter to a half mile to the
northeast and east.

-------
                                                   Table 2-2. (Continued)
UATMP
Code



DEMI





DMIA






DNFL




E7MI

Monitoring
Location



Dearborn in
Detroit, MI





Des Moines, IA





T~)iitipHiTi in St
J-x L111VU.111 111 O L.
Petersburg, FL




E7 Mile in
Detroit, MI

Land Use




Industrial





Commercial






Residential




Residential

Location
Setting



Suburban





Urban






Suburban




Suburban

Estimated
Traffic



12,791





12,400






16,281




6,999

Traffic
Year



1990





1996






1997




Unknown

Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
Dearborn, MI, is an addition to the State network. The site is
located in a residential neighborhood with industrial impacts. An
auto and steel manufacturing plant is located in close proximity to
the monitoring station. Previous violations of the PM10 standard
have also occurred at this site. The site lies between Interstate 75
and Interstate 94. This site is expected to show some of the
highest levels of air toxics in the Detroit Pilot program area. The
SO2 and PM10 measurements are also made there.
The Des Moines site is located in Polk County, Iowa, located
centrally to the downtown area and on top of a one-story building.
The elevation is slightly higher than the surrounding terrain. It is
approximately a half mile from an Interstate highway. No major
manufacturers are in the area, 2-3 miles away from a major
facility.
The neighborhood spatial scale of representativeness
characterizes this monitoring site for the Tampa Bay pilot project.
This monitor is in an area of high population density with less
commercial and industrial influences at the neighborhood scale.
Major point sources are located approximately 8 to 15 kilometers
from the monitoring site and at least 150 meters from major
roadways. Given the proximity of motor vehicle traffic it is
expected that mobile sources will contribute appreciably to the
measured samples.
The East 7 Mile site represents a location downwind from the
Detroit urban center city area and is located in a residential
neighborhood near Interstate 94. Criteria pollutants that include
NO2, O3, SO2 PM25, and PAMS are also measured at East 7 Mile.
to

-------
                                                    Table 2-2. (Continued)
UATMP
Code
ELFL
ELNJ
EPTX
G2CO
Monitoring
Location
East Lake in St.
Petersburg, FL
Elizabeth, NJ
El Paso, TX
Grand Junction,
CO (Site #2)
Land Use
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Industrial
Location
Setting
Rural
Suburban
Urban
Urban
Estimated
Traffic
14,000
170,000
3,790
2,200
Traffic
Year
1990
Unknown
1992
2001
Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
A neighborhood spatial scale of representativeness characterizes
this monitoring site selected for the Tampa Bay Region Air
Toxics Study Monitoring Stations (TBRATS) pilot project. East
Lake monitor is in an area of low population density and is
representative of urban background concentrations for the Tampa
Bay metropolitan area. Major point sources are located
approximately 8 to 15 kilometers from the monitoring site. Since
the emission points from these sources are elevated and not
proximate to the monitor, it is expected that concentrations
measured during this study will not be dominated by a single
source. In addition, this site is at least 150 meters from major
roadways.
Elizabeth is located in Union County, NJ, at an urban-industrial
site where the topography is relatively smooth. The monitoring
site is located 75 yards away from the Toll Plaza and about one
mile from Bayway Refinery. The neighborhood scale is at
maximum concentration. The location has a PM10 filter analyzer
for sulfates and nitrates as well as the UATMP site.
Located in western Texas, just across the border from Mexico and
near the border of New Mexico, the region surrounding the El
Paso monitoring station has the second highest population density
of the 1999/2000 UATMP monitoring location. The monitoring
site is located downtown, in a high-traffic area.
This site is located at the Mesa County Health Department north
of the Grand Junction downtown area, a residential area that is
exposed to major roadways. A hospital is located next door to the
facility and is the only significant point source in the surrounding
area. The site is also the primary neighborhood PM10 and PM2 5
monitoring stie for Grand Junction.
to
I


oo

-------
                                                    Table 2-2. (Continued)
UATMP
Code
GAFL
GJCO
GPMS
JAMS
Monitoring
Location
Gandy in
Tampa, FL
Grand Junction,
CO (Site #1)
Gulf Port, MS
Jackson, MS
Land Use
Commercial
Residential
Commercial
Commercial
Location
Setting
Suburban
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Estimated
Traffic
81,460
10,000
17,000
12,500
Traffic
Year
Unknown
Unknown
1995
Unknown
Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
A neighborhood spatial scale of representativeness characterizes
this monitoring site selected for the Tampa Bay Region Air
Toxics Study Monitoring Stations (TBRATS) pilot project. This
monitor is sited in an area of high population density with
uniform, mixed land use, consisting of residential, commercial,
and industrial properties. Major point sources are located
approximately 8 to 15 kilometers from the monitoring site. Since
the emission points from these sources are elevated and not
proximate to the monitor, it is expected that concentrations
measured during this study will not be dominated by a single
source. In addition, this site is at least 150 meters from major
roadways. However, given the proximity of motor vehicle traffic
it is expected that mobile sources will contribute appreciably to
the measured samples.
This site is southeast of the Grand Junction downtown area at the
Mesa County Traffic Services. It is located in a light industrial
area that contains pockets of residential areas. A variety of
industrial uses are in the area, including a cement plant, metal
fabricators, plating operations, a linen cleaner, a pump repair
facility, and oil and chemical distributors. This site represents a
maximum concentration neighborhood scale for Grand Junction.
The Gulf Port site is in a light commercial and residential area.
This site was selected because this area is believed to have high
ambient air toxic concentrations based upon information from the
NATA study and Mississippi's major source emission
inventories.
The Jackson site is in a light commercial and residential area.
This site was selected because this area is believed to have high
ambient air toxic concentrations based upon information from the
NATA study and Mississippi's major source emission
inventories.
to




VO

-------
                                                    Table 2-2. (Continued)
UATMP
Code
LEFL
LOMI
MUIA
NBNJ
PGMS
PSAZ
Monitoring
Location
Lewis in Tampa,
FL
Lodge in
Detroit, MI
Muscatine, IA
New Brunswick,
NJ
Pascagoula, MS
Supersite in
Phoenix, AZ
Land Use
Residential
Mobile
Industrial
Agricultural
Commercial
Residential
Location
Setting
Urban
Urban
Suburban
Rural
Urban
Urban
Estimated
Traffic
1,055
100,000
2,800
63,000
8,600
250
Traffic
Year
1999
1990
Unknown
Unknown
2,000
1993
Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
This monitor is in an area of moderate population density with
fewer commercial and industrial influences at the neighborhood
scale. Major point sources are located approximately 8 to 15
kilometers and at least 150 meters from major roadways. Given
the proximity of motor vehicle traffic it is expected that mobile
sources will contribute appreciably to the measured samples.
This is a mobile source oriented site that is established in
Southfield, in the southeast portion of Oakland County. The site
is located at the nexus of 696, Telegraph Road, and the Lodge
Freeway.
The Muscatine site is located in Muscatine County, IA, in a park
in a residential section of town. Two hundred yards north of the
site is a grain elevator that offloads to the Mississippi River to the
west. The large grain processing plant fed by the elevator is
located a quarter mile to the south of the site.
The New Brunswick site is located in a suburban-agricultural,
residential area and is topographically smooth. The actual site
location is in Rutgers University's Horticultural Farm.
The Pascagoula site is mostly in a commercial area and is in
proximity to perhaps the largest industrial area in Mississippi.
The industries near the Pascagoula site include chemical
processes, petroleum refining, and ship building.
Maricopa County established the South Phoenix site at its current
location in 1999 and operates carbon monoxide, ozone and PM10
monitors. The state of Arizona also operates PAMS and air toxics
monitors. The site is at the edge of a residential area, but also
borders on a mixture of commercial properties (retail stores,
restaurants and offices). There are industrial areas approximately
one mile north of the site.
to

to
o

-------
                                                    Table 2-2. (Continued)
UATMP
Code



QVAZ








RRMI






S2MO



S3MO

Monitoring
Location



Queen Valley in
Phoenix AZ








River Rouge in
Detroit, MI






St. Louis, MO
(Site #2)


St. Louis MO
(Site #3)

Land Use




Desert








Industrial






Residential



Residential

Location
Setting



Rural








Suburban






Urban



Urban

Estimated
Traffic



200








500






1,000



8,532

Traffic
Year



2001








Unknown






1999



1998

Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
The state of Arizona established the Queen Valley Water Tank
site in 2001, near the Superstition Wilderness Class I area, as a
state Class I visibility monitoring location and a PAMS Type 3
monitoring location. The Queen Valley site consists of an
IMPROVE aerosol sampler, a nephelometer and meteorological
monitoring equipment. The state also operates ozone, trace level
NO^y, PAMS and air toxics monitors. The area surrounding the
site is primarily undeveloped desert. The town of Queen Valley is
located approximately 0.5 miles north of the site.
River Rouge, in Detroit, MI has been part of the state of
Michigan's network since the end of 1993. It is located in a
residential neighborhood that is also impacted by industrial
sources, near Interstate 75 and Southwest High School.
Emissions from a steel plant, which occupies a few miles along
the riverfront, impact the site. There are drywall manufacturing
companies, the waste water treatment plant, a sewage incinerator,
an asphalt plant, an oil refinery, coke batteries, coke by-product
production facilities, various types of power generation plants,
coal and oil fired combustion sources, paint shops, and assembly
plants. The SO2 and PM10 are also monitored at this location.
The St. Louis, Grant Street site has residential influences to the
east and commercial influences to the north/northeast. Wind
speed, direction, temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation,
and barometric pressure are also measured at this site.
The site at Keokuk Street in St. Louis is a residential site.

Volatile organic compounds were the only compounds being
monitored in 2001.
to
to

-------
                                                                Table 2-2.  (Continued)
        UATMP
          Code
  Monitoring
   Location
 Land Use
Location
 Setting
Estimated
 Traffic
 Traffic
  Year
                     Description of the
                   Immediate Surroundings
          SIFL
  Simmons in
  Tampa, FL
    NA
  NA
  18,700
Unknown
Neighborhood spatial scale of representativeness characterizes
this monitoring site selected for the Tampa Bay pilot project.
East Lake monitor is in an area of low population density and is
representative of urban background concentrations for the Tampa
Bay metropolitan area. Major point sources are located
approximately 8 to 15 kilometers and at 150 meters from major
roadways.
          SJPR
 San Juan, PR
Commercial
Suburban
 51,000
Unknown
to
to
to
The Site at the Bayamon Regional Jail, in San Juan, conducts
monitoring for VOC and carbonyls.  The prevailing sources
within a 3 mile radius of the site include the San Juan power
plant, highways with a nearby toll gate, an asphalt plant, a sewage
authority facility, and industry.  Additionally, the San Juan area
has a large number of automobiles.
         SFSD
Sioux Falls, SD
Residential
 Urban
  4,320
  1999
The monitoring site is located in Sioux Falls, SD the largest city
in the state, near 2 grade schools north of the site and residential
areas on the west, east, and south. The area within 1 mile of the
site is mostly residential with a few retail businesses.  The main
industrial area of the city is about 3 miles northwest and 2 miles
to the west of the site.  The site was selected because it represents
population exposure to chemical and paniculate emissions from
the industrial parts of the city. The predominant wind direction is
northwest for most of the year with southeast winds during the
summer months.

-------
                                                    Table 2-2. (Continued)
UATMP
Code
SLCU
SLMO
SPAZ
Monitoring
Location
Salt Lake City,
UT
St. Louis, MO
(Site #1)
South Phoenix,
AZ
Land Use
Residential
Residential
Residential
Location
Setting
Suburban
Urban
Urban
Estimated
Traffic
20,485
15,016
50,000
Traffic
Year
1995
2,000
1995
Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
The West Valley site, where the UATMP sampler is located, is in
the southeast corner of the staff parking lot behind Hillsdale
Elementary School. The sampler is north of the school
playground and west of a large, open residential lot. The site is a
neighborhood scale SLAMS site for PM2 5, CO, and ozone
sampling, not near any point sources of air toxics, but
approximately 100 yards from the nearest street - 12,000 cars per
day on average. The site is several city blocks away from the
nearest major street or freeway. A variety of light industries and
trucking companies are also located in the area, but not within 2
or 3 blocks.
The site at Grant School in St. Louis is a residential site.
Commercial influences are approximately 200 yards east.
Volatile organic compounds, carbonyls, hydrocarbons, MET,
metals, and PM25 speciation were conducted in 2001 at this site.
The Supersite is intended to represent the central core of the
Phoenix metropolitan area in a high emissions area, and is a
PAMS Type 2 site. The site is used to house a variety of air
monitoring equipment including criteria pollutant samplers and
analyzers, PAMS and air toxics, total NMHC, meteorology,
visibility/urban haze, and has been selected for several state and
national air monitoring studies. The area surrounding the site is
primarily residential neighborhoods. There is an interstate
highway approximately one mile west of the site, as well as
commercial and industrial areas within five miles of the site.
to

-------
                                                     Table 2-2. (Continued)
UATMP
Code




SWMI






TUMS





YFMI



Monitoring
Location



South West
High School in
Detroit, MI






Tupelo, MS





Yellow Freight,
MI



Land Use





Commercial






Commercial





Industrial



Location
Setting




Urban






Suburban





Urban



Estimated
Traffic




18,437






4,900





500



Traffic
Year




Unknown






1997/1995





Unknown



Description of the
Immediate Surroundings
Southwest High School has been part of the Michigan network
since 1990 and serves as the long term trend location for the air
toxics network. It is located in a residential neighborhood that is
impacted by industrial sources, near Interstate 75. The major
sources include two steel mills, a used oil reclamation plant, and
various manufacturing companies. The recent empowerment
zone status achieved by the area will bring in new industries and
businesses. The Detroit Waste Water Treatment plant is also
close. Measurements for PM2 5, SO2 and PM10 are also collected at
the site.
The Tupelo site is in a light commercial and residential area. This
site was selected because this area is believed to have high
ambient air toxic concentrations based upon information from the
NATA study and Mississippi's major source emission
inventories.
The Yellow Freight site is currently being used to collect SO2
measurements and is located in the center of a highly
industrialized area. The primary influence is from a nearby tar
battery plant. The site is about 2.25 miles away from the
Dearborn and 0.75 miles away from the Southwest High School
sites. Its inclusion in the study provides information about the
degree of heterogeneity of toxic air contaminants across a small
scale.
to
to

-------
                                Table 2-3.  Site Descriptions for the 2001 UATMP Monitoring Stations
2001
UATMP
Code
A2TX
APMI
AZFL
BAPR
BUND
C2IA
CANJ
CHNJ
CLIA
CRIA
DAIA
DECO
AIRS Site Code
48-439-0057
26-163-0001
12-103-0018
72-017-0003
38-057-004
19-113-0037
34-007-0003
34-027-3001
19-045-0021
19-113-0039
19-163-0015
08-031-0002
Location
Arlington, TX
Allen Park in Detroit,
MI
Azalea Park in St.
Petersburg, FL
Barceloneta, PR
Beulah, ND
Cedar Rapids, IA
(Site #2)
Camden, NJ
Chester, NJ
Clinton, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
(Site#l)
Davenport, IA
Denver, CO
Population
Residing Within
10 Miles of the
Monitoring
Station a
721,819
1,033,740
596,939
26,644C
6,204
174,385
2,113,778
239,072
42,478
175,333
274,768
1,261,437
County-level Stationary
Source HAP Emissions in the
1999NEIb(tpy)
4,027
7,281
1,744
1,322
1,324
825
1,071
865
529
825
365
7,040
Closest National Weather
Service Station
Dallas Fort Worth
International Airport
Detroit/Metropolitan
Airport
St. Petersburg/Whitted
San Juan, PR
Bismarck Municipal
Airport
Cedar Rapids Municipal
Philadelphia, PA
Somerville, NJ
Davenport Municipal
Airport
Cedar Rapids Municipal
Airport
Davenport Nexrad
Denver International
Airport
to

-------
                                                    Table 2-3. (Continued)
2001
UATMP
Code
DEMI
DMIA
DNFL
E7MI
ELFL
ELNJ
EPTX
G2CO
GAFL
GJCO
GPMS
JAMS
LEFL
AIRS Site Code
26-163-0033
19-153-0030
12-103-1008
26-163-0019
12-103-5002
34-039-0004
48-141-0027
08-077-0016
12-057-1065
08-077-0003
28-047-0008
28-049-0010
12-057-1075
Location
Dearborn in Detroit,
MI
Des Moines, IA
Dunedin in St.
Petersburg, FL
E7 Mile in Detroit, MI
East Lake in St.
Petersburg, FL
Elizabeth, NJ
El Paso, TX d
Grand Junction, CO
(Site #2)
Gandy in Tampa, FL
Grand Junction, CO
(Site#l)
Gulf Port, MS
Jackson, MS
Lewis in Tampa, FL
Population
Residing Within
10 Miles of the
Monitoring
Station a
1,241,008
379,063
452,739
1,154,868
495,457
2,093,628
423,488
102,230
458,547
111,385
177,534
265,530
589,756
County-level Stationary
Source HAP Emissions in the
1999NEIb(tpy)
7,281
1,417
1,744
7,281
1,744
3,227
1,947
1,880
2,082
1,880
938
1,062
2,082
Closest National Weather
Service Station
Detroit City Airport
Des Moines International
Airport
New Port Ritchie, FL
Detroit City Airport
New Port Ritchie, FL
Newark International
El Paso International
Airport
Grand Junction, CO
Tampa, FL International
Grand Junction, CO
Gulf Port, MS
Jackson/Allen C.
Thompson Field
New Port Ritchie, FL
to
to

-------
                                                    Table 2-3. (Continued)
2001
UATMP
Code
LOMI
MUIA
NBNJ
PGMS
PSAZ
QVAZ
RRMI
S2MO
S3MO
SFSD
SIFL
SJPR
SLCU
AIRS Site Code
26-125-0010
19-139-0020
34-023-0006
28-059-0006
04-013-9997
04-021-8001
26-163-0005
29-510-0090
29-510-0091
46-099-0007
12-057-0081
72-127-0006
49-035-3007
Location
Lodge in Detroit, MI
Muscatine, IA
New Brunswick, NJ
Pascagoula, MS
Supersite in Phoenix,
AZ
Queen Valley in
Phoenix, AZ
River Rouge in
Detroit, MI
St. Louis, MO
(Site #2)
St. Louis, MO
(Site #3)
Sioux Falls, SD
Simmons in Tampa,
FL
San Juan, PR
Salt Lake City, UT
Population
Residing Within
10 Miles of the
Monitoring
Station a
1,115,500
33,956
841,801
59,236
1,313,315
87,354
905,107
807,997
725,662
148,462
672,150
436,334C
819,703
County-level Stationary
Source HAP Emissions in the
1999NEIb(tpy)
6,348
2,372
2,897
3,073
7,170
910
7,281
1,980
1,980
363
2,082
901
2,658
Closest National Weather
Service Station
Pontiac, MI
Iowa City, IA
Somerville, NJ
Pascagoula, MS
Phoenix/Deer Valley
Municipal Airport
Phoenix/Sky Harbor
Airport
Detroit City Airport
Cahokia/St. Louis
Cahokia/St. Louis
Joe Foss Field Airport
St. Petersburg/Whitfed
San Juan, PR
Salt Lake City
International Airport
to
to

-------
                                                                  Table 2-3.  (Continued)
2001
UATMP
Code
SLMO
SPAZ
SWMI
TUMS
YFMI
AIRS Site Code
29-510-0089
04-013-4003
26-163-0015
28-081-0005
26-163-0027
Location
St. Louis, MO
(Site # 1)
South Phoenix, AZ
South West High
School in Detroit, MI
Tupelo, MS
Yellow Freight in
Detroit, MI
Population
Residing Within
10 Miles of the
Monitoring
Station a
807,997
807,330
1,196,371
70,981
1,196,371
County-level Stationary
Source HAP Emissions in the
1999NEIb(tpy)
1,980
7,170
7,281
3,981
7,281
Closest National Weather
Service Station
Cahokia/St Louis
Phoenix - Deer Valley
Municipal Airport
Detroit City Airport
Tupelo, MS
Detroit City Airport
to
to
oo
       a Reference: http://link-usa.com/zipcode/pop.htm
       b Reference:  NEI, 2001.
       0 For the two Puerto Rico sites, population estimates were only available for 1997.  These data reflect county-level population.
       d The El Paso, Texas, monitoring station is located less than 10 miles from the United States-Mexico border.  Because only U.S. census and industry data were
       reviewed for this study, the listed site characteristics may understate the actual population and number of industrial sources near these monitoring stations.

-------
         Table 2-4.  VOC Method Detection Limits
           Compound
 Method Detection Limit
	(ppbv)	
Hydrocarbons
Acetylene
Benzene
1,3-Butadiene
Ethylbenzene
«-Octane
Propylene
Styrene
Toluene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
m-,p-Xylene
o-Xylene
         0.13
         0.04
         0.07
         0.04
         0.06
         0.05
         0.07
         0.06
         0.07
         0.07
         0.05
         0.05
Halogenated Hydrocarbons
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloromethylbenzene
Chloroprene
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
ra-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
/>-Dichlorobenzene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethene
c/5-l,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
ci s -1,3 -Dichloropropene
         0.12
         0.06
         0.08
         0.09
         0.08
         0.06
         0.08
         0.05
         0.05
         0.07
         0.10
         0.08
         0.08
         0.05
         0.06
         0.09
         0.08
         0.06
         0.10
         0.10
         0.06
         0.07
         0.10
                            2-29

-------
                         Table 2-4. (Continued)
Compound
Method Detection Limit
(ppbv)
Halogenated Hydrocarbons (Continued)
trans- 1 ,3 -Dichloropropene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Hexachloro- 1 , 3 -Butadiene
Methylene Chloride
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
0.11
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.04
0.07
0.06
Polar Compounds
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Ethyl Acrylate
Ethyl fert-Butyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
Methyl fert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
fert-Amyl Methyl Ether
0.25
0.21
0.16
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.18
0.18
0.12
Because w-xylene and/?-xylene elute from the GC column at the same time, the VOC
analytical method can only report the sum of m-xylene and/?-xylene concentrations and
not concentrations of the individual compounds.
                                 2-30

-------
Table 2-5. SNMOC Method Detection Limits
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
1,3 -Butadiene
w-Butane
c/s-2-Butene
/raws-2-Butene
Cyclohexane
Cyclopentane
Cyclopentene
w-Decane
1-Decene
m -Diethylbenzene
/>-Diethylbenzene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
w-Dodecane
1-Dodecene
Ethane
2-Ethyl-l-Butene
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene
Method Detection
Limit
ppbC
1.12
0.86
0.61
0.72
0.97
0.58
1.00
0.44
0.81
0.57
0.57
1.32
0.92
0.92
1.23
1.18
1.07
0.85
0.85
0.87
1.04
0.66
0.70
Compound
3 -Methyl- 1-Butene
Methylcyclohexane
Methylcyclopentane
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
2 -Methy Ihexane
3 -Methy Ihexane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-l-Pentene
4-Methyl-l-Pentene
w-Nonane
1-Nonene
n-Octane
1-Octene
w-Pentane
1-Pentene
c/s-2-Pentene
/ra«5-2-Pentene
a-Pinene
(3-Pinene
Propane
w-Propylbenzene
Method Detection
Limit
ppbC
0.73
0.80
0.64
0.66
0.65
0.58
0.62
0.50
1.04
1.04
0.93
0.69
0.69
0.86
0.65
0.55
0.53
0.81
0.54
0.57
0.57
0.77
1.08
                  2-31

-------
                             Table 2-5.  (Continued)
Compound
ffj-Ethyltoluene
o-Ethyltoluene
/>-Ethyltoluene
w-Heptane
1-Heptene
w-Hexane
1-Hexene
c/s-2-Hexene
/raws-2-Hexene
Isobutane
Isobutene/ 1 -Butene
Isopentane
Isoprene
Isopropylbenzene
2-Methyl-l-Butene
2-Methyl-2-Butene
Method Detection
Limit
ppbC
1.03
1.10
1.30
0.69
0.62
0.78
1.04
0.78
0.78
0.61
0.62
0.73
0.67
1.21
0.53
0.81
Compound
Propylene
Propyne
Styrene
Toluene
w-Tridecane
1-Tridecene
1,2,3 -Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
2,3 ,4-Trimethylpentane
w-Undecane
1-Undecene
m-,p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Method Detection
Limit
ppbC
0.80
0.76
0.82
1.02
0.85
0.85
1.0
1.85
1.14
0.69
0.74
0.69
0.85
0.85
1.03
0.71
Concentration in ppbC = concentration in ppbv x number of carbon atoms in compound.

Because Isobutene and 1-Butene elute from the GC column at the same time, the SNMOC analytical
method can only report the sum of concentrations for these two compounds and not concentrations of the
individual compounds. For the same reason, the w-xylene and^-xylene concentrations are reported
together as a sum.
                                       2-32

-------
                       Table 2-6. Carbonyl Method Detection Limits
                       Compound
             Acetaldehyde
             Acetone
             Benzaldehyde
             Butyr/Isobutyraldehyde
             Crotonaldehyde
             2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
             Formaldehyde
             Hexaldehyde
             Isovaleraldehyde
             Propionaldehyde
             Tolualdehydes
             Valeraldehyde
Method Detection Limit (ppbv)
           0.005
           0.002
           0.003
           0.011
           0.005
           0.004
           0.016
           0.003
           0.004
           0.005
           0.009
           0.005
Notes: The carbonyl detection limits are based on a sample volume of 500 liters of ambient air.

       Because butyraldehyde and isobutyraldehyde elute from the HPLC column at the same time, the
       carbonyl analytical method can only report the sum of concentrations for these two compounds
       and not concentrations of the individual compounds. For the same reason, the analytical method
       also reports only the sum of concentrations for the three tolualdehyde isomers, as opposed to
       reporting separate concentrations for the three individual compounds.
                                            2-33

-------
Table 2-7. Semivolatile Organic Compound Method Detection Limits
Compound
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Azobenzene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
fe(2-Chloroethyl)ether
/>/X2-Chloroethoxy)methane
/>/X2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
fe(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Carbazole
4-Chloroaniline
Chlorobenzilate
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
1 -Chloronaphthalene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
Method
Detection
Limit
Total ug/m3
0.03
0.04
0.07
0.24
0.05
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.24
0.04
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.24
0.08
0.15
0.09
0.05
Compound
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isodrin
Isophorone
Isosafrole
3 -Methylcholanthrene
Methyl methanesulfonate
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
1 -Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Method
Detection
Limit
Total ug/m3
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.12
0.14
0.07
0.05
0.07
0.06
0.10
0.03
0.24
0.07
0.24
0.11
0.24
0.24
0.08
0.05
0.07
0.24
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.12
0.50
0.04
                             2-34

-------
Table 2-7. (Continued)
Compound
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Chrysene
o-Cresol (2-Methylphenol)
o-Toludine
p-Cresol (3,4-Methylphenol)
Diallate
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Di-«-butyl phthalate
Di-«-octyl phthalate
Dinoseb
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 3 -Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
3 , 3 '-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Diethyl phthalate
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
7, 12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
3 . 3 '-Dimethylbenzidine
a,a-Dimethylphenethylamine
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl phthalate
1 ,3 -Dintrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Method
Detection
Limit
Total ug/m3
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.24
0.04
0.24
0.08
0.04
0.07
0.06
0.24
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.07
0.09
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.24
0.05
0.08
0.04
0.24
0.05
Compound
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
5 Nitro-o-Toluidine
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
1 ,4-Phenylenediamine
2-Picoline
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Method
Detection
Limit
Total ug/m3
0.11
0.24
0.24
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.24
0.24
0.05
0.24
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.05
0.11
0.14
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.24
0.24
0.05
0.05
0.07
0.03
0.03
        2-35

-------
                                      Table 2-8. Sampling Schedules and Completeness
Code
A2TX
APMI
AZFL
BAPR
BUND
C2IA
CANJ
CHNJ
CLIA
CRIA
DAIA
DECO
DEMI
DMIA
Monitoring
Location
Arlington, TX
Allen Park in
Detroit, MI
Azalea Park in St.
Petersburg, FL
Barceloneta, PR
Beulah, ND
Cedar Rapids, IA
(Site #2)
Camden, NJ
Chester, NJ
Clinton, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
Davenport, IA
Denver, CO
Dearborn in
Detroit, MI
Des Moines, IA
Sampling Period
Starting
Date
1/7/01
4/19/01
1/1/01
5/31/01
1/1/01
1/4/01
1/19/01
5/25/01
1/1/01
1/1/01
1/1/01
1/1/01
4/19/01
1/1/01
Ending
Date
7/6/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/30/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
10/16/01
12/2701
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/31/01
11/19/01
Carbonyl Data
A
15
22
66
22
64
119
49
36
27
61
33
62
223
30
B
14
22
66
22
61
119
44
36
25
57
31
60
223
24
C
93
100
100
100
95
100
90
100
93
93
94
97
100
80
VOC Data
A
14
24
—
19
61
114
45
32
25
58
31
59
213
25
B
14
24
—
19
61
114
45
32
25
58
31
59
213
25
C
100
100
—
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
SNMOC
A
—
—
—
19
60
110
—
—
24
57
30
58
—
24
B
—
—
—
19
60
110
—
—
24
57
30
58
—
24
C
—
—
—
100
100
100
—
—
100
100
100
100
—
100
svoc
A
—
22
—
—
—
—
33
30
—
—
—
—
43
—
B
—
19
—
—
—
—
33
30
—
—
—
—
34
—
C
—
86
—
—
—
—
100
100
—
—
—
—
79
—
to

-------
                                                   Table 2-8. (Continued)
Code
DNFL
E7MI
ELFL
ELNJ
EPTX
G2CO
GAFL
GJCO
GPMS
JAMS
LEFL
LOMI
MUIA
Monitoring
Location
Dunedin in St.
Petersburg, FL
E7 Mile in
Detroit, MI
East Lake in St.
Petersburg, FL
Elizabeth, NJ
El Paso, TX
Grand Junction,
CO (Site #2)
Gandy in Tampa,
FL
Grand Junction,
CO (Site #1)
Gulf Port, MS
Jackson, MS
Lewis in Tampa,
FL
Lodge in Detroit,
MI
Muscatine, IA
Sampling Period
Starting
Date
1/1/01
4/19/01
1/1/01
1/7/01
1/7/01
5/7/01
1/1/01
5/7/01
8/17/01
5/13/01
1/1/01
4/19/01
1/1/01
Ending
Date
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/21/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
10/28/01
Carbonyl Data
A
62
—
62
49
30
40
64
39
13
16
63
21
29
B
62
—
62
47
28
40
64
39
13
16
63
21
27
C
100
—
100
96
93
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
93
VOC Data
A
—
—
—
48
30
39
—
39
13
21
—
41
27
B
—
—
—
48
30
39
—
39
13
21
—
41
27
C
—
—
—
100
100
100
—
100
100
100
—
100
100
SNMOC
A
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
26
B
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
26
C
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
100
svoc
A
—
21
—
31
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
43
—
B
—
15
—
30
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
39
—
C
—
71
—
97
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
91
—
to

-------
                                                     Table 2-8. (Continued)
Code
NBNJ
PGMS
PSAZ
QVAZ
RRMI
S2MO
S3MO
SFSD
SIFL
SJPR
SLCU
SLMO
Monitoring
Location
New Brunswick,
NJ
Pascagoula, MS
Supersite in
Phoenix, AZ
Queen Valley in
Phoenix, AZ
River Rouge in
Detroit, MI
St. Louis, MO
(Site #2)
St. Louis, MO
(Site #3)
Sioux Falls, SD
Simmons in
Tampa, FL
San Juan, PR
Salt Lake City,
UT
St. Louis, MO
(Site #1)
Sampling Period
Starting
Date
5/25/01
7/24/01
6/6/01
6/6/01
4/19/01
5/13/01
5/13/01
1/1/01
1/1/01
5/31/01
1/7/01
5/13/01
Ending
Date
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/21/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
12/27/01
Carbonyl Data
A
39
17
—
—
1
—
—
—
66
22
59
38
B
39
17
—
—
1
—
—
—
66
22
53
38
C
100
100
—
—
100
—
—
—
100
100
90
100
VOC Data
A
36
15
35
32
21
37
35
61
—
17
54
28
B
36
15
32
27
21
37
35
60
—
17
54
28
C
100
100
91
89
100
100
100
98
—
100
100
100
SNMOC
A
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
60
—
17
53
—
B
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
60
—
17
53
—
C
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
100
—
100
100
—
svoc
A
33
—
—
—
22
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
B
32
—
—
—
20
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
C
97
—
—
—
91
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
to

OJ
oo

-------
                                                             Table 2-8. (Continued)

Code

SPAZ

SWMI


TUMS
YFMI

—

Monitoring
Location

South Phoenix,
AZ
South West High
School in Detroit,
MI
Tupelo, MS
Yellow Freight in
Detroit, MI
Overall
Sampling Period
Starting
Date
8/5/01

4/19/01


7/24/01
4/19/01

—
Ending
Date
12/27/01

12/27/01


12/27/01
12/27/01

—
Carbonyl Data
A

	

1


17
41

1,618
B

	

1


17
41

1,581
C

	

100


100
100

98
VOC Data
A

25

—


17
38

1,429
B

21

—


14
38

1,413
C

84

—


82
100

99
SNMOC
A

26

—


—
—

564
B

26

—


—
—

564
C

100

—


—
—

100
svoc
A

32

22


—
43

375
B

32

19


—
36

339
C

100

86


—
84

90
to
OJ
VO
     A = Days When Samples Were Collected
     B = Days With Valid Samples
     C = Completeness (%)
     Note:   The completeness data only indicate the number of days when samples were collected.

-------
3.0    Summary of the 2001 UATMP Data
       This section summarizes the data gathered during the 2001 UATMP reporting year.  A
total of 70 VOC and carbonyl compounds were sampled during this program reporting year.
(Unlike previous years, acrolein was not analyzed.) Within the VOCs, three distinct groups of
compounds were identified:  1) hydrocarbons; 2) halogenated hydrocarbons; and 3) polar
compounds.  All four of the these compound groups (including carbonyls) are discussed in
greater detail in Sections 3.2 through 3.5.

       This reporting year includes urban air toxic concentration data beginning on January 1,
2001 across thirteen sites and ending on December 31, 2001 at the Dearborn site in Detroit,
Michigan (DEMI).  A complete presentation of the data is found in Appendices C through N.
Specifically:

•      Appendix C: 2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring;
       Appendix D: 2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring;
•      Appendix E: 2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring;
•      Appendix F: 2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring;
•      Appendix G: 2001 Summary Tables for Metals Monitoring;
•      Appendix H: 2001 Summary Tables for Hexavalent Chromium Monitoring;
       Appendix I: 2001  VOC Raw Monitoring Data;
       Appendix J: 2001 SNMOC Raw Monitoring Data;
•      Appendix K: 2001 Carbonyl Raw Monitoring Data;
       Appendix L: 2001 SVOC Raw Monitoring Data;
•      Appendix M: 2001 Metal Raw Monitoring Data; and
•      Appendix N: 2001 Hexavalent Chromium Raw Monitoring Data.
                                          5-1

-------
Nearly 127,200 urban air toxics data concentrations (including duplicate and replicate samples)
were collected at the forty-two sites for the 2001 UATMP reporting year. Additionally, thirteen
sites chose to sample for speciated nonmethane organic compounds (SNMOC) accounting for
another 57,200 data concentrations. Finally, semivolatile data were collected at twelve sites
totaling nearly 48,500 data concentrations, and those data are listed in Appendix F.  These data
will be analyzed on a site-specific basis in sections four through eleven of this document.
Although there are forty-three stations listed in Section 2 of this document, two sites did not
sample for either VOCs or carbonyls (SFSD and E7MI).

3.1    Data Summary Parameters
       The summary tables in Appendices F through I were uploaded into a database for air
quality analysis.  This section will examine five different data summary parameters: 1) number of
sampling detects; 2) concentration range; 3) geometric means; 4) prevalence;  and 5) correlation.
The following paragraphs review the basic findings indicated by the summary tables.

       3.1.1    Number of Sampling Detects
       Tables 3-1 and 3-2 are sampling detect summaries of the seventy VOC and carbonyl
concentrations. Less than 55  % of the pollutants sampled were found to be above the method
detection limit (MDL).  Of those that were detected:

•      33.7% were hydrocarbons;
•      25.4% were halogenated hydrocarbons;
•      5.2% were polar compounds; and
•      35.7% were carbonyl compounds.

Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde had the greatest number of detectable values reported in
samples (2,012 and 1,978, respectively), while eight compounds had zero detects (see Tables 3-1
and 3-2).
                                          5-2

-------
       3.1.2    Concentration Range
       Nearly 83% of the detects had concentration values less than 1 ppbv. Less than 2% had
concentration values greater than 5 ppbv. Carbonyl compounds had the highest number of
samples greater than 5 ppbv (463); halogenated hydrocarbons had the lowest (76).  There was at
least one compound sampled at greater than 5 ppbv on 110 of 295 total sampling days. An
interesting note is that 22 of the seventy compounds never exceeded 1 ppbv.

       The range of detectable values for each site is listed in Table 3-3. The APMI, BAPR,
CLIA, GPMS, LOMI, and NBNJ sites had maximum values of over 100 ppbv, unusually high
when compared to the other sites.  DEMI, which sampled nearly every day from beginning in
April, had the greatest number of detects (8,996) and G2CO  had the greatest number of samples
greater than 5 ppbv (125).

       3.1.3    Geometric Means
       The geometric mean is the central tendency of lognormally distributed data, and can be
calculated by taking the "nth" root of the product of the "n" concentrations. The geometric mean
is a useful parameter for calculating a central tendency of a concentration data set, whose
arithmetic mean may be skewed by an usually high concentration value. Geometric means for
each site of the four different pollutant groups are presented  in Table 3-4 and shown graphically
in Figure 3-1. The BAPR site had the highest geometric mean for total polar compounds (9.19
ppbv); the GJCO had the highest geometric mean for total hydrocarbons (21.04 ppbv). The
highest total halogenated hydrocarbon geometric mean was at APMI (19.28 ppbv). The G2JO
site has the  highest total carbonyl geometric mean (12.42 ppbv). Although RRMI and SWMI
calculated geometric means greater than 26 ppbv each, that was based on one sample day.

       3.1.4    Prevalence
       In the context of the UATMP, prevalence refers to the frequency with which an air
pollutant is  found at levels detectable by the corresponding sampling and analytical method. By
indicating the frequency of detection, prevalence can help  participating agencies identify
compounds of concern in urban air pollution.  Because part of this report is organized to evaluate

                                          3-3

-------
trends in ambient air quality primarily on the basis of compound groups, the prevalent
compounds are identified on a program-wide, not site-specific, basis. More importantly, the
number of nondetects for a given compound (indicated by low prevalence) must be considered
when interpreting air monitoring results. Specifically, annual average concentrations cannot be
accurately estimated for compounds that are not detected in a majority of samples.

       When reviewing the data summary tables, readers should note that a prevalence of zero
does not necessarily indicate that a compound is not present in ambient air.  Rather, compounds
with a prevalence of zero may be present in the air, but at levels consistently below method
detection limits.

       For the purposes of this report, a group of program-wide prevalent compounds was
identified for each of the compound groups listed in Section 3.0. These groups of program-wide
prevalent compounds are discussed in detail in Sections 3.2 through 3.5, and throughout the
remaining chapters of this report.  Because the UATMP does not characterize every component
of air pollution, many compounds known to be prevalent in urban air (e.g., ozone and nitrous
oxides) are not considered in this report. Readers should be careful not to confuse the most
prevalent compounds program-wide identified by the 2001 UATMP with the most prevalent
compounds in urban air pollution.

       In previous UATMP reports, program-wide prevalent compounds were identified using
two statistical parameters: the count of the number of nondetects (ND); and the percent
contribution of their mass concentrations.  If a compound was detected in at least 75 percent of
all the samples, and if the compound contributed to at least 90 percent of the mass concentration
within a compound group, then that  compound was considered "program-wide prevalent".  Due
to the significant increase in the number of participating  sites from the previous year (from 15 to
41), this identification scheme needed to be re-evaluated to ensure capture of the prevalent
compounds.  The historical scheme worked well for the carbonyls, and identified the same three
prevalent compounds from the previous year. However, only twelve VOC compounds were
identified using the first criterion,  and only a handful of these satisfied the second criterion.  To

                                          3-4

-------
ensure that an acceptable number of VOC prevalent compounds are identified, both criterion

were revised: 1) to be considered prevalent, the compound must be in at least 60% of samples

collected by a site; 2) the compounds must satisfy the first criterion in 28 of the 34 sites sampling

for VOCs; 3) the compounds satisfying the first and second criterion must contribute to at least

90% of their compound group's mass concentration; and 4) the third criterion must satisfy 28 of

the 34 sites sampling for VOCs. Fourteen compounds met both of these criteria (3 halogenated

hydrocarbons, 7 hydrocarbons, 1 polar compound, and 3 carbonyl compounds).


      For the 2001 UATMP, the program-wide  prevalent VOC are:


               HYDROCARBONS

               -    Acetylene
               -    Benzene
               -    Ethylbenzene
               -    o-xylene
               -    Propylene
               -    Toluene

               HALOGENATED HYDROCARBONS

               -    Chloromethane
               -    Dichlorodifluoromethane
               -    Methylene Chloride

               POLAR COMPOUNDS

                    Methyl Ethyl Ketone

               CARBONYL COMPOUNDS

                    Acetaldehyde
                    Acetone
                    Formaldehyde


      Because these compounds were consistently present at detectable levels, the UATMP

monitoring data characterize ambient levels for these compounds much more accurately than

they characterize ambient levels for the VOCs and carbonyls with lower prevalence. Further, the
                                          5-5

-------
high prevalence allows for a meaningful statistical analysis of data correlations and a thorough
review of spatial variations and temporal variations in ambient air quality.

       Readers interested in closer examination of data trends for the less program-wide
prevalent compounds should refer to the summary tables in Appendices F through I, and the raw
monitoring data in Appendices J through M. However, the reader should note the limitations
posed by data sets with many nondetect observations.

       Figures 3-2 through 3-15 illustrate how geometric mean concentrations for the program-
wide prevalent VOCs and carbonyls varied from one monitoring location to the next.

       3.1.5    Pearson Correlations
       This report uses Pearson correlation coefficients to measure the degree of correlation
between two variables. By definition, Pearson correlation coefficients always lie between -1 and
+1.  Three qualification statements may be made:
       A correlation coefficient of-1 indicates a perfectly "negative" relationship, indicating that
       increases in the magnitude of one variable are associated with proportionate decreases in
       the magnitude of the other variable, and vice versa;
       A correlation coefficient of+1  indicates a perfectly "positive" relationship, indicating that
       the magnitudes of two variables both increase and both decrease proportionately.
       Data that are completely uncorrelated have Pearson correlation coefficients of zero.
Therefore, the sign (positive or negative) and magnitude of the Pearson correlation coefficient
indicate the direction and strength, respectively, of data correlations.

       When calculating correlations among the UATMP data, several measures were taken to
identify spurious correlations and to avoid introducing bias to the correlations:
       The statistical significance of the Pearson correlation coefficients was evaluated using a
       standard t-test—a test commonly used for this purpose (Harnett, 1982).  In this report,

-------
       Pearson correlation coefficients were tested for statistical significance using the 5 percent
       level of significance.  Whenever possible, a 95 percent confidence interval was calculated
       around the estimated correlation coefficient. If zero did not fall within the interval, the
       coefficient was considered statistically significantly different from zero.

       Data correlations were calculated only for the most program-wide prevalent compounds
       listed in this report. Because the UATMP monitoring data are least precise for
       compounds having many nondetect observations (see Section 17), eliminating the less
       program-wide prevalent compounds improves the correlation analysis.

       Correlations were calculated from the processed UATMP monitoring database in which
       each compound has just one numerical concentration for each successful sampling date.
       Nondetect observations, duplicate sampling events, and replicate laboratory analyses were
       all replaced with appropriate surrogate values. With these data quality measures, data
       analysts ensured that the calculated correlations characterize actual trends in the UATMP
       air monitoring data.
3.2    UATMP Compound Groups

       The seventy UATMP compounds listed in section 2 are grouped into four compound

groups: hydrocarbons; halogenated hydrocarbons; polar compounds; and carbonyls.  Each

member of the compound groups shares similar chemical makeup, as well as exhibits similar

tendencies.


3.2.1   Hydrocarbons

       Hydrocarbons are organic compounds that contain only carbon and hydrogen.

Hydrocarbons are derived mostly from crude petroleum and also from coal tar and plant sources

and are classified according to the arrangement of the atoms, as alicyclic, aliphatic, and aromatic.

Hydrocarbons are of prime economic importance because they encompass the constituents of the

major fossil fuels, petroleum and natural gas, as well as plastics, waxes, and oils. In urban air

pollution, these components—along with oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and sunlight—contribute to the

formation of tropospheric ozone.


       As stated above, hydrocarbons in the atmosphere originate from natural sources and from

various anthropogenic sources, such  as combustion of fuel and biomass, petroleum refining,

petrochemical manufacturing, solvent use, and gas and oil production and use.  Studies have


                                          3-7

-------
shown that emissions from different anthropogenic sources vary significantly from location to
location.  For example, on a nationwide basis, EPA estimates that 50 percent of anthropogenic
nonmethane volatile organic compound releases in 1996 came from industrial processes,
42 percent from transportation, 6 percent from fuel combustion, and the rest from other sources
(USEPA, 1997). In urban areas, however, the estimated contributions of different source
categories differ from these national averages. For instance, a 1987 study in the Los Angeles
area estimated that 49 percent of nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions come from vehicle exhaust,
11 percent from liquid gasoline, 10 percent from gasoline vapor, and 30 percent from sources
other than motor vehicles (Fujita et al., 1994). These figures suggest that motor vehicles may
play a greater role in hydrocarbon emissions in urban areas than national statistics indicate.

3.2.2   Halogenated Hydrocarbons
       Halogenated hydrocarbons are organic compounds that contain carbon, hydrogen, and
halogens - the chemical group that includes chlorine, bromine, and fluorine.  Most halogenated
hydrocarbons are used for industrial purposes and as solvents, though some are produced
naturally (Godish, 1997).  Once emitted to the air, many volatile halogenated hydrocarbons resist
photochemical breakdown and therefore persist in the atmosphere for relatively long periods of
time (Godish, 1997; Ramamoorthy and Ramamoorthy, 1997).  These compounds can cause
chronic health effects as well as contribute to the formation of tropospheric ozone. Like
hydrocarbons, only the halogenated hydrocarbons with lower molecular weights are volatile, and
the sampling and analytical methods used in the 1999-2000 UATMP measure a subset of 37 of
these volatile compounds.

3.2.3   Polar Compounds
       Polar compounds (i.e., oxygenated compounds such as methyl fert-butyl ether, methyl
ethyl ketone, etc.) were  added to the UATMP analyte list that included the volatile halogenated
hydrocarbons and selected hydrocarbons because of the nation-wide use of these types of
compounds as gasoline additives and the toxicity of these gasoline additives. Because of the
prevalence of compounds characteristic of motor vehicle emissions, any compounds used as
gasoline additives would be expected to be correspondingly prevalent.  Other polar compounds

-------
such as acetonitrile were added to the analyte list because the compounds were observed at high
concentrations at one or more monitoring sites.

3.2.4   Carbonyl Compounds
       Carbonyl compounds are organic compounds characterized by their composition of
carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, and by the presence of at least one carbon-oxygen double bond.
Several different factors are known to affect ambient air concentrations of carbonyl compounds,
but most notably:
       Combustion sources, motor vehicles, and various industrial processes that emit carbonyl
       compounds directly to the atmosphere;
       Photochemical reactions that form carbonyl compounds in the air, typically from airborne
       hydrocarbons; and
       Photochemical reactions that consume carbonyl compounds from the air, generally by
       photolysis or by reaction with hydroxyl radicals (Seinfeld, 1986).
3.3    Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters
       Ambient air concentration tendencies often correlate favorably with ambient
meteorological observations.  The following three sections summarize how each of the prevalent
compound concentrations correlated with seven meteorological parameters: maximum daily
temperature; average daily temperature; average daily dew point temperature; average daily wet
bulb temperature; average daily relative humidity; and average wind information.

3.3.1   Maximum and Average Temperature
       Temperature is often a component to high ambient air concentrations for some
compounds, such as ozone. The temperature will help speed up the kinetics as compounds react
with each other. According to Table 3-5, the program-wide prevalent compounds had very weak
correlations with maximum temperature and average temperature.  Toluene had the strongest
correlation with maximum temperature (0.18), while methyl ethyl ketone had the strongest
correlation with average temperature (0.19).
                                          5-9

-------
       The poor correlation across all sites is not surprising due to the complex and diverse local
meteorology associated with the states.  In the previous UATMP report, eleven of the fifteen sites
were in four states. For this report, 43 sites are spread across eleven states and one U.S. territory.
As seen in Sections 4 through 16, the temperature parameters correlate much better at the
individual sites.

3.3.2   Moisture Parameters
       Three moisture parameters were used in this study for correlation with  the prevalent
compounds. The dew point temperature is the temperature to which moist air  must be cooled for
it to reach saturation with respect to water.  The wet-bulb temperature is the temperature to
which moist air must be cooled by evaporating water into it at constant pressure until saturation
is reached.  The relative humidity is the  ratio of the mixing ratio to its saturation value at the
same temperature and pressure (Rogers  and Yau, 1989). All three of these parameters provide an
indication of how much moisture is presently in the air.

       As can be seen in Table 3-5, the three moisture parameters had very weak correlations
with the prevalent compounds across all 43 sites, consistent with the above temperature
observations. The sites used for sampling in this program year were located in different climatic
zones ranging from a desert climate (Arizona) to a very moist climate (Florida).  Acetone
concentrations had the strongest correlation with the three moisture parameters (-0.29 with dew
point temperature; -0.15 with wet-bulb temperature; and -0.32 with relative humidity).  As seen
in Sections 4 through 16, the moisture parameters correlate much better at the  individual sites.

3.3.3   Wind Information
       Surface wind observations include two primary components: wind speed and wind
direction.  Wind speed, by itself, is a scalar value and is usually measured in nautical miles or
knots.  Wind direction describes where the wind is coming from, and is measured in degrees
where 0° is from the north, 90° is from  the east,  180° is from the south, and 270° is from the
west.  Together, the wind speed and wind direction are described as a vector, and the hourly
values can now be averaged.

                                          3-10

-------
       The u-component of the wind speed is the vector value traveling toward the x-axis in a
Cartesian grid coordinate system. The u-component is calculated as follows:

       u-component = -1* (wind speed) * sin(wind direction, degrees)

Similarly, the v-component of the wind speed is the vector value traveling toward the y-axis in a
Cartesian grid coordinate system. The v-component is calculated as follows:

       v-component = -1* (wind speed) * cos(wind direction, degrees)

Using the u- and v- components of the wind speed enables averaging and correlation analyses
with the measured concentrations.

       As can be seen in Table 3-5, the u- and v- components of the wind speed have very weak
correlations with the prevalent compounds across all sites, consistent with the temperature and
moisture parameter observations. Geographical features such as mountains influence wind speed
and wind direction.  The sites used for sampling in this program year were located in different
geographic zones ranging from a mountainous region (Colorado) to a plains region (Iowa).
Additionally, sites located downwind may correlate better with the measured concentrations than
sites upwind. Acetaldehyde concentrations had the strongest negative correlation with the v-
component of the wind speed (0.12), while o-xylene had the strongest correlation with the v-
component of the wind speed (-0.12).  As seen  in Sections 4 through 16, the u- and v-
components correlate much better at the individual sites.

3.4    The Impact of Motor Vehicle Emissions on Spatial Variations
       Motor vehicles significantly contribute to  air pollution in urban environments.  Pollutants
found in motor vehicle exhaust generally result from incomplete combustion of vehicle fuels.
Although modern vehicles and, more recently, vehicle fuels have been engineered to minimize
air emissions, all motor vehicles with internal combustion engines emit a wide range of chemical
pollutants.  The magnitude of these emissions in urban areas primarily depends on the volume of

                                         3-11

-------
traffic, while the chemical profile of these emissions depends more on vehicle design and fuel
content. This report uses three parameters to evaluate the impact of motor vehicle emissions on
ambient air quality:

•      Motor Vehicle ownership data;
•      Motor vehicle emissions profiles; and,
•      Estimated daily traffic estimates.

       3.4.1    Motor Vehicle Ownership Data
       As an indicator of motor vehicle emissions near the UATMP monitoring locations,
Table 3-6 presents estimates of the number of cars owned by residents within 10 miles of each
monitoring location. The total number of motor vehicles owned within a 10-mile radius was
estimated based on a ratio of 0.74 cars per person (U.S. population of 275,000,000 and total
number of motor vehicles in U.S. of 203,500,000).

       For purposes of comparison, both motor vehicle ownership data and the geometric mean
of total program-wide  prevalent  hydrocarbons are presented in Table  3-6. The data in the table
indicate a positive linear correlation between motor vehicle ownership and ambient air
concentrations of hydrocarbons.  However, readers should keep in mind other factors that might
impact the reliability of motor vehicle ownership data as an indicator of ambient air monitoring
data results:
       Estimates of higher car ownership within a 10-mile radius do not necessarily imply
       increased motor vehicle use in the immediate vicinity of a monitoring location.
       Conversely, sparsely populated regions often contain heavily traveled roadways.
       Emissions sources in the area other than motor vehicles may significantly affect levels of
       hydrocarbons in the ambient air.
                                          3-12

-------
       3.4.2    Motor Vehicles Emissions Profiles
       The magnitude of emissions from motor vehicles generally depends on the volume of
traffic in urban areas, but the composition of these emissions depends more on vehicle design.
Because the distribution of vehicle design (i.e., the relative number of motor vehicles of different
styles) is probably quite similar from one urban area to the next, the composition of air pollution
resulting from motor vehicle emissions is not expected to exhibit significant spatial variations.
In support of this hypothesis, previous air monitoring studies have observed relatively constant
composition of ambient air samples collected along heavily traveled urban roadways (Conner
et al., 1995). Roadside studies have found particularly consistent proportions  of four
hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and the xylene isomers  - the "BTEX"
compounds) both in motor vehicle exhaust and in ambient air near roadways.

       To examine the impact of motor vehicle emissions on air quality at the 2001 UATMP
monitoring sites, Figure 3-16 compares concentration ratios for the BTEX compounds measured
during the 2001 UATMP to the ratios reported in a roadside study (Conner et al., 1995). This
comparison provides a qualitative depiction of how greatly motor vehicle emissions affect air
quality at the UATMP monitoring locations: the more similar the concentration ratios at a
particular monitoring location are to those of the roadside study, the more likely that motor
vehicle emissions impact ambient levels of hydrocarbons at that location.

       As Figure 3-16 shows, the concentration ratios for BTEX compounds measured at every
UATMP monitoring station bear some resemblance to the ratios reported in the roadside study.
The BTEX ratios at  the G2CO monitoring site appear to be the most similar to the roadside study
profile.  For all monitoring locations the toluene:ethylbenzene ratio is clearly the largest value of
the four ratios, with  the exceptions to this ratio at SLMO and YFMI; the xylene:ethylbenzene
ratio is clearly the smallest value of the ratios, with the exceptions of BAPR, CFDSTJ,  JAMS,
NBNJ, PGMS, SJPR, and SLMO . These observations  suggest, though certainly do not prove,
that emissions from  motor vehicles significantly affect levels of hydrocarbons in urban ambient
air.
                                          3-13

-------
       3.4.3    Estimated Traffic Data
       When a site is being characterized, a parameter often recorded is the number of vehicles
which daily pass the monitor. For 37 of the forty-three UATMP monitors, traffic data were
available; for the unknown traffic data count, local agencies were contacted to provide an
estimation. Table 3-6 contains the estimated daily traffic values, as well as county-level on-road
and non-road HAP emissions.

       Both ELNJ and LOMI experience high amounts of traffic, yet their hydrocarbon
geometric means rank 11th and 21st across the sites, respectively. The highest geometric means
were at GJCO, PGMS, and JAMS, yet the traffic count is ranked 22nd, 24th, and 25th, respectively.
Specific characterizations for these sites appears in the separate state sections. Estimated county
HAP emissions were highest in Maricopa County, AZ, which is the location of two monitoring
sites: PSAZ and SPAZ. Interestingly, the two sites have similar geometric hydrocarbon
concentrations (PSAZ, 7.49 ppbv; SPAZ, 8.02 ppbv), yet their exposure to passing traffic is very
different. Nearly 50,000 cars daily pass the SPAZ site (traffic ranking 9th), while only 250 motor
vehicle daily pass the PSAZ site (traffic ranking 41st). There does not appear to be any direct
correlation between traffic counts and geometric hydrocarbon concentrations.

3.5    Variability Analysis
       Two types of variability were analyzed for this report. The first type examines the
coefficient of variance analysis for each of the prevalence across the UATMP sites. Figures 3-17
to 3-30 are graphical  displays of site standard deviation versus average concentration. Most of
the prevalent compounds are either in a cluster (such as w-,/»-xylene), exhibit a positive linear
correlation (such as propylene), or are spread randomly (such as toluene).  The coefficient of
variance provides a relative measure of variability by expressing variations to the magnitude of
the arithmetic mean.  This analysis is better suited for comparing variability across data
distributions for different sites and compounds.

       Seasonal variability was the second type of variability analyzed in  this report. The
UATMP concentration data were divided into the four seasons: spring (March, April, May);

                                          3-14

-------
summer (June, July, August); fall (September, October, November); and winter (December,
January, and February). Figures 3-31 to 3-44 are a graphical display of the average concentrations
by season for the prevalent compounds. There appears to be no consistency across the sites as to
which season predominantly has higher concentrations. A quick review of the profiles reveals
most compounds experienced noticeable "spikes" across all sites, while few exhibited a uniform
profile (acetaldehyde and chloromethane, for example). This observation validates the
variabilities for each of the sites.
                                          3-15

-------
Figure 3-1: Comparison of the Geometric Means of the Compound Groups
37.50
35.00
32.50
30.00
27.50 -
^3
0.
centration (
•i !->• N) r-
n xi o r-
3 Ln o L
D O O C
0
0 12.50
10.00
7.50
2.50










1
"








i

I— 1













-













n H
BW
-
-

"




nUj
ll
F i-1 CC Q
1 §! < =

Si
o
1
-1
0








"
'

n
n
B


"
JUU
III
-1
0
0
















s * ° *
0 Q g Q
i-i
~


,
1
a



_
I.
ll


































































"








D
























-

-


-










-

-» « N N
§ i 5 >
E £ 0- E



















LL
LL
• Carbonyls n Halogenated Hydrocarbons n Hydrocarbons n Fblar Compounds


.

0









S3MO
-
-

Q
IL.








-
1
























-


-


-














i-i


B.


« « « « M ^ ^

-------
                     Figure 3-2: Geometric Mean of Acetaldehyde by Monitoring Location
-. 4

I
Q.
Q.
re
0)
o
0)
O
   3 -
                                                Monitoring Location

-------
                                Figure 3-3:  Geometric Mean of Acetone by Monitoring Location
           7
oo
        C
        TO
        (1)
0)


§  3
O
          2 --
                                                                               n
                                                        Monitoring Location

-------
                                Figure 3-4: Geometric Mean of Acetylene by Monitoring Location
VO
        £1
        Q.
        C
        re
        0)
0)


o
0)
                       n
fl
                                                                             n
                                                         Monitoring Location

-------
                               Figure 3-5: Geometric Mean of Benzene by Monitoring Location
to
o
                                                        Monitoring Location

-------
                              Figure 3-6: Geometric Mean of Chloromethane by Monitoring Location
to
           0.9




           0.8




           0.7




         a. 0.6
         C
         re
           0.5
0)


|  °'4
O


   0.3
           0.2
           0.1
             n
                                                           ft
                ^
             .x^,
 ro
/,O
                                                    c? cT
^,
                                                                                                     ^?-
                                             ^cd^
                                                           Monitoring Location

-------
                         Figure 3-7: Geometric Mean of Dichlorodifluoromethane by Monitoring Location
to
to
           o.<
           0.8
           0.7
        £
        & 0.6
         C
         re
         0)
         o
         
-------
                              Figure 3-8:  Geometric Mean of Ethylbenzene by Monitoring Location
OJ
K)
1 .O
1 R
1 4
1 ? -
2
Q.
Q.
I 1"
i
o
'^ n a
Geomet
D C
J) C
n 4 -
n o
n








nn





n

nnn Lnn
1-1




n


1-1



-











1-1













n














—










n




.-I


n

nL
"














PI
PI

                                                         Monitoring Location

-------
        25
                       Figure 3-9: Geometric Mean of Formaldehyde by Monitoring Location
        20
OJ
to
        15
       c
       re
       0)
0)
I
0)
O
        10
       n   Lnn
                                                 n
                                             Monitoring Location

-------
                          Figure 3-10: Geometric Mean of m-,p-Xylene by Monitoring Location
OJ
K)
6 -
5 _
si
Q.
Q.
~ 4 -
re
0)
o
"S 3 -1
E
o
0)
O
2
1
n






nn


„ n n
fl

x I ^ Q < 5 2
a a < 1 S < 5

n n n


< < < o
— i cc:  ^^ ^^ I*
^> fy1 f\J (V) LL
1

±
3.
^0





^
7)



p

1 1 M

-------
OJ


to
Q.

Q.
re
0)
o

1=  4
*-  **

-------
                 Figure 3-12:  Geometric Mean of Methylene Chloride by Monitoring Location
OJ

to
£1
Q.
Q.
re
!3
o
0)
     n
                                 n n  n  l~l  I inni-inni-inlli-illnn_nnni-innl I n n n
                                              Monitoring Location

-------
                            Figure 3-13: Geometric Mean of o-Xylene by Monitoring Location
          2.5
to
oo
£

1  1-'

c
re
o>


o
'C
4-1
0)


I   1
0)
O
           0.5
               nn
                                                           \\
n
                                                       Monitoring Location

-------
                               Figure 3-14:  Geometric Mean of Propylene by Monitoring Location
to
VO
           2.5
        £1
        Q.
         C
         re
0)


o

-------
                         Figure 3-15: Geometric Mean of Toluene by Monitoring Location
OJ


o
   4.5
   3.5
•Q
0.
C
re
   2.5
1   2
o
0)
O

   1.5
   0.5
                                                                   n
                                                                                       n
                                                   Monitoring Location

-------
               Figure 3-16: Comparison of Concentration Ratios for BTEX Compounds vs.

                                            Roadside Study
o

is
a:

o
0)
u
c
O
o
        ROADSIDE       A2TX
APMI
BAPR        BUND


 Monitoring Location
C2IA
CANJ
CHNJ
               OBenzene-Ethylbenzene uToluene-Ethylbenzene om-,p-Xylene-Ethylbenzene oo-Xylene-Ethylbenzene

-------
                                               Figure 3-16 (Continued)
OJ



to
o

'•re



o

'•re
o
c
o
o
ROADSIDE        CLIA
                                       CRIA
                                                               DAIA          DECO


                                                               Monitoring Location
DEMI
DMIA
ELNJ
                   ]Benzene-Ethylbenzene nToluene-Ethylbenzene am-,p-Xylene-Ethylbenzene ao-Xylene-Ethylbenzene

-------
                                    Figure 3-16 (Continued)
ROADSIDE       EPTX
G2CO
GJCO        GPMS
 Monitoring Location
JAMS
LOMI
MUIA
      \3Benzene-Ethylbenzene t\Toluene-Ethylbenzene \3rn-,p-Xylene-Ethylbenzene no-Xylene-Ethylbenzene

-------
                                    Figure 3-16 (Continued)
ROADSIDE       NBNJ
PGMS
PSAZ         QVAZ
 Monitoring Location
RRMI
S2MO
S3MO
      \3Benzene-Ethylbenzene t\Toluene-Ethylbenzene  \3rn-,p-Xylene-Ethylbenzene no-Xylene-Ethylbenzene

-------
                                    Figure 3-16 (Continued)
ROADSIDE
SFSD
SJPR
SLCU        SLMO
 Monitoring Location
SPAZ
TUMS
YFMI
      \3Benzene-Ethylbenzene ^Toluene-Ethylbenzene Dm-,p-Xylene-Ethylbenzene \3o-Xylene-Ethylbenzene

-------
                   Figure 3-17: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Acetaldehyde Across 36 Sites
   4.0
   3.5
   3.0
   2.5
c
o



12-°
Q

k.
CD



I15
V)
   1.0
   0.5
   0.0
0.0       0.5       1.0       1.5
                                         2.0       2.5       3.0       3.5


                                                Average Concentration (ppbv)
4.0       4.5       5.0       5.5
6.0

-------
                       Figure 3-18: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Acetone Across 36 Sites
   4.0
   3.5
   3.0
>
.Q  o c
Q.  ^.O
C
o

13
>  2.0
0)
Q
   1.5
   1.0
   0.5
(0
   0.0
     0.0     0.5     1.0     1.5     2.0    2.5     3.0     3.5     4.0     4.5    5.0     5.5     6.0     6.5     7.0    7.5     8.0

                                                   Average Concentration (ppbv)

-------
                              Figure 3-19:  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Acetylene Across 35 Sites
OJ


oo
            20.0
            18.0 -
            16.0
            14.0
         £1
            12.0 -
         c
         o


         I  10.0
         a>
         Q
         •§   8.0
         c
         re
         55
             6.0
             4.0
             2.0
             0.0
               0.0
2.0
4.0               6.0              8.0


          Average Concentration (ppbv)
10.0
12.0

-------
                      Figure 3-20:  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Benzene Across 35 Sites
OJ




VO
   11.0
   10.0
    9.0
    8.0
.a   7.0
a.
a.
£   6.0
CO

'
CD
    5.0
CO
•a



I   4.0
    3.0
    2.0
    1.0
    0.0
       0.0
                                1.0
2.0
   3.0              4.0


Average Concentration (ppbv)
5.0
6.0
7.0

-------
                           Figure 3-21: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Chloromethane Across 35 Sites
OJ



o
            1.2
            1.0
         -0.8

         £1
         Q.
c
o


1  0.6
a>
Q

E
re

c
re

w  0.4
            0.2
            0.0
              0.0
                0.1
0.2
                                                                                         •>	*	*-
0.3
0.4         0.5         0.6


Average Concentration (ppbv)
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0

-------
           Figure 3-22: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Dichlorodifluoromethane Across 35 Sites
   5.0
   4.5 -
   4.0 -
   3.5 -
3 3.0 -]

o
is
>  2.5 -
Q
•D
TO
I  2.0 -j

w

   1.5 -
   1.0 -
   0.5
   0.0
      0.0       0.5       1.0       1.5       2.0       2.5       3.0       3.5       4.0       4.5

                                                Average Concentration (ppbv)
5.0       5.5
6.0

-------
                   Figure 3-23: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Ethylbenzene Across 35 Sites
OJ



to
   2.5
   2.0
I 1.5

c
0

-------
                   Figure 3-24: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Formaldehyde Across 36 Sites
   14.0
   12.0
   10.0
£1
Q.
c   8.0
o

1
>

Q

"S.   6.0
re
•c
c
5
V)


    4.0
    2.0
    0.0
0.0      2.0      4.0      6.0      8.0
                                                10.0     12.0     14.0     16.0     18.0     20.0     22.0     24.0     26.0


                                                  Average Concentration (ppbv)

-------
                  Figure 3-25: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of /n-,p-Xylene Across 35 Sites
   8.0
   7.0
   6.0
I. 5.0
o
Q

•o

TO
T3
   3.0
   2.0
   1.0
   0.0
      0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0          4.0          5.0

      Average Concentration (ppbv)
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0

-------
                Figure 3-26:  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Methyl Ethyl Ketone Across 35 Sites
   9.0
   8.0
   7.0
£1

Q.
o  5.0
?
.5

0)


"

re
•c
c
re

w  3.0
   4.0
   2.0
   1.0
   0.0
0.0       1.0       2.0       3.0       4.0       5.0       6.0       7.0


                                            Average Concentration (ppbv)
8.0
9.0
                                                                                                   10.0      11.0
                                                                                                                     12.0

-------
                Figure 3-27:  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Methylene Chloride Across 35 Sites
   10.0 n
    9.0
    8.0 -
    7.0
    6.0
c
.0
?
.2   c
>   5.

Q
•c

I   4.
c

5
V)
    3.0
    2.0 -
    1.0
    0.0
JE.
      0.0
          1.0
2.0
3.0
 4.0        5.0        6.0


Average Concentration (ppbv)
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0

-------
   2.5
   2.0
                    Figure 3-28: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of o-Xylene Across 35 Sites
£1
Q.

S 1.5
c
o

1

0)
Q

E
re
   1.0
c
re

55
   0.5
                   .*   *  *
   0.0
      0.0
0.5
1.0
    1.5             2.0


Average Concentration (ppbv)
2.5
3.0
3.5

-------
                               Figure 3-29:  Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Propylene Across 35 Sites
OJ


oo
            5.0
            4.5
            4.0
            3.5
         £1
         Q.
            3.0
          c
          o
         '•5

         1 2.5
          0)
         Q
         •g 2.0
         c
         re
         55
            1.5
            1.0
            0.5
            0.0
               0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0         2.5          3.0

Average Concentration (ppbv)
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0

-------
                Figure 3-30: Coefficient of Variance Analysis of Toluene Across 35 Sites
6i7-e
Standard Deviation (ppbv)
R n
K K
K n
4 5
4 n
•2 C
o n
0 K
9 n
1 ^
1 n
n 5
n n -
•

*



*
•
«,
•
*
• * •
^
•• .
* ~
,*>* *
*
•
0.0       0.5       1.0       1.5      2.0      2.5      3.0       3.5
                                           Average Concentration (ppbv)
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0

-------
                        Figure 3-31a: Average Acetaldehyde Concentration by Season (A2TX-EPTX)
OJ


o
        £ 4
        Q.
        Q.
c  o
0)  o
O

O
O
0)
O)
                              <
-------
Figure 3-31 b: Average Acetaldehyde Concentration by Season (G2CO-YFMI)
<

      /
                              Site

-------
               Figure 3-32a:  Average Acetone Concentration by Season (A2TX-EPTX)
OJ

to
                                                                                            D Winter
                                                                                              Spring
                                                                                            D Summer
                                                                                            rjFall
A2TX APMI AZFL BAPR BUND C2IA  CANJ CHNJ CLIA  CRIA  DAIA DECO DEMI DMIA DNFL ELFL  ELNJ  EPTX
                                            Site

-------
                Figure 3-32b: Average Acetone Concentration by Season (G2CO-YFMI)
0

-------
                  Figure 3-33a: Average Acetylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
  25
  20
£1
O.
Q.
o 15
+J

2
o>
o

o
O
o -in
O)  IU
2


I
                                                                                      n
                                                                    D Winter

                                                                    • Spring

                                                                    D Summer

                                                                    DFall
      i
fkn
Ifl
                        &  cr
                                                       °
   0Y   C?
                                                      0°  ,0°
                                                Site

-------
25
20
                Figure 3-33b:  Average Acetylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
.a
a.
_a
?15-
^
0)
u
o
0
g, 10
2
1






D Winter
• Spring
D Summer
D Fall


   JAMS  LOMI  MUIA  NBNJ PGMS PSAZ QVAZ  RRMI  S2MO S3MO SFSD SJPR SLCU SLMO SPAZ TUMS YFMI
                                             Site
                                              3-55

-------
                 Figure 3-34a: Average Benzene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
  14
  12
  10
   8

0)
u
c
o
O


S,  6
                                                                               0°
                                              Site

-------
                   Figure 3-34b: Average Benzene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
£1
Q.
Q.
  14
  12
  10
2  8
o>
u
c
O
O
0)
O)
2
0)
6
   2 -
      JAMS LOMI MUIA NBNJ PGMS PSAZ QVAZ RRMI S2MO S3MO SFSD  SJPR  SLCU SLMO SPAZ TUMS  YFMI

                                                Site

-------
                      Figure 3-35a: Average Chloromethane Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
OJ

oo
           V

-------
                Figure 3-35b: Average Chloromethane Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
  2.5
£1
Q.
0)
u
  1.5
      JAMS  LOMI MUIA  NBNJ PGMS PSAZ QVAZ RRMI S2MO S3MO SFSD  SJPR SLCU SLMO SPAZ TUMS YFMI


                                                Site

-------
                   Figure 3-36a: Average Dichlorodifluoromethane Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
         3.5
OJ


o
£1
O.
£ 2.5
c
o
'^
Q
+«i
c   9
Q)   Z
o

o
O

o) 1.5
Q


I


    1



D Winter
• Spring
D Summer
DFall



                                                                 
-------
             Figure 3-36b: Average Dichlorodifluoromethane Concentration bySeason (JAMS-YFMI)
   3.5
I 2.5
c
o

'i
*J
§   2
u
o
O
0)
O)
2 1.5

I
   0.5
D Winter

• Spring

D Summer

DFall
       JAMS  LOMI MUIA NBNJ  PGMS PSAZ QVAZ  RRMI  S2MO S3MO SFSD  SJPR SLCU SLMO  SPAZ TUMS YFMI

                                                 Site

-------
OJ

to
£1
O.
Q.
° 4
+J
2
o>
o
O
O
0)
O)
2

I
               Figure 3-37a: Average Ethylbenzene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
        .nm
                                      Jo
Fhrfl ,r»-n
.fill
rwfl  ^m rvfl
DJ
H
flL
                                                                         o   ro
                                            Site

-------
Figure 3-37b: Average Ethylbenzene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
                                                                              D Winter
                                                                              • Spring
                                                                              D Summer
                                                                              DFall
                              Site

-------
                Figure 3-38a: Average Formaldehyde Concentration by Season (A2TX-GJCO)
Q.
Q.
  24




  22




  20




  18




  16




o 14
+J



1 12
o

o
O 10
o>
O)


Q)  8




   6




   4




   2




   0
                                                                                             D Winter

                                                                                             • Spring

                                                                                             D Summer

                                                                                             DFall
                                                                     t
                                            flu
t
<

                                                                                        ,O
                                                                                  o-
                                               Site

-------
               Figure 3-38b: Average Formaldehyde Concentration by Season (GPMS-YFMI)
  24




  22




  20




  18
t 16
I  14
+J
"5
                                                    Value = 24.59
o
O
o>
O)

s
0)
   12
   10
                                                                                   D Winter

                                                                                   • Spring

                                                                                   D Summer

                                                                                   nFall
      GPMS JAMS  LEFL  LOMI  MUIA  NBNJ PGMS RRMI  SIFL  SJPR SLCU  SLMO  SWMI TUMS  YFMI


                                               Site

-------
                         Figure 3-39a: Average m,p-Xylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
Oi
Oi



                                                                                    n90   t?  <&
                                                                                   &   o   <$
                                                      Site

-------
            Figure 3-39b: Average m,p-Xylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
14
12
.a
a m _
;ntration (
XI (
o
c
o
O
0)
0)
5° 6 -
1
4
2 -
n -








Value = 24.9


-












rf\] i-i^n

I






i-i



-


















i-i
r
"
	 nilfUirxir^n


D Winter
• Spring
D Summer
DFall

-i
1 1
IM! ttULk
JAMS LOMI MUIA NBNJ PGMS  PSAZ  QVAZ RRMI S2MO S3MO SFSD  SJPR  SLCU SLMO SPAZ TUMS YFMI
                                          Site

-------
                     Figure 3-40a:  Average Methyl Ethyl Ketone Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
       £1

       O.
OJ



oo
       .2 4


       2
o>
u

o
O

0)
O)

2



I
                                                       Site

-------
               Figure 3-40b: Average Methyl Ethyl Ketone Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
SI

Q.
C

.2  4
+J

2
+j
c
0)
o
c
O  o
o  6
0)
O)

2


I
<  2
                                                                                       Value =13.08
                           n
D Winter


• Spring

D Summer


DFall

                                                             >
                                                  Site

-------
                     Figure 3-41a: Average Methylene Chloride Concentration bySeason (A2TX-GPMS)
OJ



o
c;

c
o
f
2
•4-i
C 7
Q) J
O
O
o
0)
O)
2 o
Q) ^
-I _
n -





rf





































L





I


Values from left to right are 80.53, 536.04, 63.81 , 9.48, and
17.91.





*nLj*M
i-i


-




D Winter
• Snrinn
D Summer
nFall


1 III rJTn rtVi rL-h nil-,
                                                      Site

-------
               Figure 3-41b: Average Methylene Chloride Concentration bySeason (JAMS-YFMI)
c
o
0)
o

o
o

0)
O)

2
0)
                              Values from left to right are 51 .06 and 10.60
D Winter

• Spring

D Summer


DFall
                           n.
                                                  Site

-------
                           Figure 3-42a: Average o-Xylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
OJ


to
6

">~
Q.
0 A
oncentrati
A3 J
u «
Average
0


n









rl-, rm


















.




















.









™fi *, rwn ill r»Tl r¥Tl [¥fl Hill [







-





















1



n Winter
• Spring
D Summer
DFall



n
Li
                                                                                            o
                                                                                          &   s
                                                        Site

-------
            Figure 3-42b: Average o-Xylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
6

£1
Q.
o 4
~ 4
2
+-i
0)
o
c
0 o
O °
0)
O)
2
0)
3 0
1 _

n



























-i











rl~h i-L^n





I








1












-



















p.






























n
1









r








PI










Ftan PI n rta-Tl ^-,
_ _ I n M Lr-n n~i i i-ui













n Winter
• Spring
D Summer
DFall


1u n
1 n
n n L-.
li n M
\r

-------
                 Figure 3-43a: Average Propylene Concentration by Season (A2TX-GPMS)
£1
O.

3: 5
Q) ^
O

O
O


I3


I
    i
r¥H
[iffl rlfl Hf
       £  «r
   &  cr
                                                                        °
                                           Site

-------
                   Figure 3-43b: Average Propylene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
£1
15
Q)
O
O
O
0)
o>
2
I
D Winter
• Spring
D Summer
DFall
                                       ri-i
     JAMS  LOMI  MUIA  NBNJ PGMS  PSAZ QVAZ RRMI S2MO S3MO SFSD SJPR SLCU SLMO SPAZ TUMS  YFMI
                                                Site

-------
   14
   12
   10
si
Q.
.1   8
0)
o

o   fi
O   D

0)
O)

2
0)
                    Figure 3-44a: Average Toluene Concentration bySeason (A2TX-GPMS)
                                                                            Value is 14.41
                                    n
                     L
                                                                                 0°  ,0°
                                                                                                 D Winter

                                                                                                 • Spring

                                                                                                 D Summer

                                                                                                 DFall
                                                 Site

-------
                   Figure 3-44b: Average Toluene Concentration by Season (JAMS-YFMI)
   14
   12
   10
si
Q.
.1  8
0)
o

o
O
0)
O)

2
0)
               urn.
                         D Winter

                         • Spring

                         D Summer

                         DFall
I
I
                                              Site

-------
Table 3-1. Sampling Detect Summaries of the VOC Concentrations
Chemical1
#of
Detects
Min.
Value
(ppbv)
Max.
Value
(ppbv)
Average
Value
(ppbv)
Geometric
Mean
(ppbv)
Median
(ppbv)
1st
Quartile
(ppbv)
3rd
Quartile
(ppbv)
Standard
Deviation
(ppbv)
Coefficient
Of
Variation
Hydrocarbons
Acetylene
Benzene
1,3-Butadiene
Ethylbenzene
n-Octane
Propylene
Styrene
Toluene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5 -Trimethylbenzene
jw-,/7-Xylene
o-Xylene
1802
1806
1103
1775
1202
1797
1027
1806
1768
1604
30
1764
0.099
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.016
0.041
0.008
0.04
0.01
0.007
0.017
0.01
82.59
45.9
6.25
10.68
1.33
19.18
1.48
33.26
2.02
2.89
0.26
9.69
2.056
0.696
0.125
0.368
0.104
1.007
0.076
1.828
0.226
0.085
0.069
0.443
1.345
0.473
0.085
0.191
0.08
0.659
0.055
1.078
0.152
0.061
0.054
0.228
1.316
0.44
0.08
0.18
0.08
0.62
0.05
1.099
0.16
0.06
0.06
0.21
0.83
0.3
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.37
0.03
0.57
0.08
0.033
0.032
0.108
2.067
0.71
0.141
0.38
0.12
1.11
0.08
2.19
0.288
0.1
0.09
0.48
3.947
1.822
0.251
0.663
0.104
1.433
0.095
2.544
0.224
0.106
0.051
0.733
1.92
2.615
2.011
1.798
1.006
1.423
1.254
1.392
0.993
1.24
0.744
1.653
Halogenated Hydrocarbons
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
11
0.13
0.84
0.438
0.383
0.31
0.3
0.635
0.222
0.507
NA
3
63
1793
35
0.08
0.018
0.01
0.021
0.77
0.37
0.39
0.52
0.363
0.082
0.092
0.131
0.245
0.066
0.09
0.092
0.24
0.06
0.09
0.11
0.16
0.044
0.08
0.05
0.505
0.1
0.1
0.175
0.295
0.063
0.02
0.116
0.812
0.764
0.213
0.885

-------
Table 3-1. Sampling Detect Summaries of the VOC Concentrations (Continued)
Chemical1
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloromethylbenzene
Chloroprene
Dibromochloromethane
1, 2-Dibromoethane
/w-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
/>-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
1, 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Hexachloro- 1 , 3 -Butadiene
#of
Detects
83
281
1804
1
2
1
Min.
Value
(ppbv)
0.047
0.01
0.14
0.04
0.07
0.61
Max.
Value
(ppbv)
1.13
0.52
6.79
0.04
0.6
0.61
Average
Value
(ppbv)
0.237
0.057
0.642
0.04
0.335
0.61
Geometric
Mean
(ppbv)
0.186
0.045
0.627
0.04
0.205
0.61
Median
(ppbv)
0.187
0.04
0.615
0.04
0.335
0.61
1st
Quartile
(ppbv)
0.12
0.03
0.565
0.04
0.203
0.61
3rd
Quartile
(ppbv)
0.265
0.06
0.689
0.04
0.468
0.61
Standard
Deviation
(ppbv)
0.189
0.051
0.202
0
0.265
0
Coefficient
Of
Variation
0.795
0.901
0.315
0
0.791
0
NA
1792
8
533
8
0.01
0.02
0.008
0.1
33.98
0.07
1.69
1.65
1.185
0.038
0.084
0.683
0.516
0.034
0.049
0.482
0.488
0.035
0.047
0.575
0.23
0.02
0.022
0.335
1.14
0.045
0.09
0.94
2.368
0.018
0.128
0.495
1.999
0.476
1.527
0.725
NA
6
2
4
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.346
0.335
0.11
0.226
0.188
0.1
0.174
0.116
0.1
0.277
0.188
0.1
0.148
0.114
0.098
0.309
0.261
0.103
0.115
0.148
0.007
0.511
0.787
0.071
NA
NA
NA
1806
257
2
0.19
0.006
0.025
460.464
0.22
0.056
1.644
0.016
0.041
0.639
0.013
0.038
0.61
0.01
0.041
0.571
0.01
0.033
0.66
0.016
0.048
20.947
0.021
0.015
12.742
1.336
0.378

-------
                         Table 3-1. Sampling Detect Summaries of the VOC Concentrations (Continued)
Chemical1
Methylene Chloride
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
#of
Detects
1668
10
709
3
1571
Min.
Value
(ppbv)
0.016
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.01
Max.
Value
(ppbv)
3333.63
0.11
1.54
0.21
1.13
Average
Value
(ppbv)
4.63
0.061
0.085
0.133
0.043
Geometric
Mean
(ppbv)
0.218
0.052
0.063
0.121
0.038
Median
(ppbv)
0.16
0.05
0.06
0.12
0.04
1st
Quartile
(ppbv)
0.09
0.033
0.04
0.095
0.03
3rd
Quartile
(ppbv)
0.38
0.088
0.1
0.165
0.047
Standard
Deviation
(ppbv)
88.877
0.032
0.097
0.058
0.051
Coefficient
Of
Variation
19.196
0.531
1.142
0.434
1.203
NA
186
1802
1803
0.019
0.03
0.02
15.172
14.503
10.08
0.246
0.348
0.115
0.062
0.323
0.105
0.05
0.301
0.1
0.034
0.28
0.09
0.09
0.341
0.12
1.507
0.373
0.239
6.121
1.07
2.084
NA
Polar Compounds
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether
Ethyl Acrylate
Ethyl fer/-Butyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
Methyl fer/-Butyl Ether
256
108
63
3
1
1614
223
26
627
0.15
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.08
0.059
0.1
0.01
195.72
60.11
0.978
0.12
0.02
38.488
5.68
2.798
11.743
14.897
2.054
0.198
0.067
0.02
1.255
0.452
0.545
0.947
3.528
0.657
0.154
0.056
0.02
0.958
0.328
0.329
0.509
2.99
0.625
0.15
0.05
0.02
0.9
0.31
0.27
0.53
1.148
0.3
0.1
0.04
0.02
0.624
0.219
0.15
0.23
7.832
1.432
0.221
0.085
0.02
1.37
0.447
0.443
1.18
33.788
6.128
0.171
0.039
0
1.709
0.621
0.686
1.184
2.268
2.983
0.866
0.579
0
1.361
1.374
1.259
1.25
1 = BOLD indicates the compound is prevalent for 2001 Program Year;
  Italics indicates the chemical is an urban air toxics strategy HAP

-------
                                  Table 3-2.  Sampling Detect Summaries of the Carbonyl Concentrations
Chemical1
#of
Detects
Min.
Value
(ppbv)
Max.
Value
(ppbv)
Average
Value
(ppbv)
Geometric
Mean
(ppbv)
Median
(ppbv)
1st
Quartile
(ppbv)
3rd
Quartile
(ppbv)
Standard
Deviation
(ppbv)
Coefficient
Of
Variation
Carbonyl Compounds
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Benzaldehyde
Butyr/Isobutyraldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Hexaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Propionaldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Valeraldehyde
1979
1964
1966
1911
1408
622
2012
1889
469
1869
1864
1704
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.017
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
19.620
18.650
1.320
1.597
0.526
1.100
59.590
4.304
2.960
1.144
3.529
1.089
1.320
1.649
0.068
0.152
0.040
0.025
3.958
0.207
0.087
0.122
0.070
0.057
1.025
1.138
0.046
0.106
0.020
0.013
2.647
0.087
0.030
0.088
0.042
0.033
1.106
1.233
0.045
0.117
0.018
0.014
2.710
0.075
0.032
0.097
0.043
0.031
0.731
0.733
0.028
0.065
0.009
0.007
1.682
0.029
0.010
0.055
0.025
0.018
1.600
2.035
0.073
0.190
0.049
0.030
4.299
0.265
0.085
0.156
0.070
0.059
1.022
1.587
0.090
0.141
0.058
0.058
5.415
0.323
0.206
0.102
0.172
0.086
0.774
0.962
1.333
0.926
1.429
2.315
1.368
1.560
2.360
0.839
2.467
1.518
oo
      1 = BOLD indicates the compound
        Italics indicates the chemical is
is prevalent for 2001 Program Year;
an urban air toxics strategy HAP

-------
Table 3-3. Range of Detectable Values by Site
UATMP Site
(SITE CODE)
A2TX
APMI
AZFL
BAPR
BUND
C2IA
CANJ
CHNJ
CLIA
CPJA
DAIA
DECO
DEMI
DMIA
DNFL
ELFL
ELNJ
EPTX
G2CO
GAFL
GJCO
GPMS
JAMS
LEFL
LOMI
MUIA
NBNJ
PGMS
PSAZ
QVAZ
RRMI
S2MO
S3MO
SFSD
SIFL
SJPR
SLCU
SLMO
SPAZ
SWMI
TUMS
YFMT
Range of
Detectable Values
(ppbv)
0.002-41
0.001 -3333.63
0.001 - 13.07
0.001 - 124.57
0-13.23
0.01-14.15
0.001-13.86
0.002-22.19
0-195.72
0.001 - 17.34
0 - 7.02
0.001 - 15.454
0-61.71
0.001 -25.42
0-59.32
0.001 -6.134
0.002-19.18
0.003-22.69
0.001 - 18.65
0-7.808
0.005 - 84.04
0.002-134.06
0.004-41.16
0-4.626
0-331.69
0.01-30.05
0.005 - 183.61
0.004-22.46
0.01-8.811
0.007-60.11
0-12.58
0.01-9.24
0.01-6.43
0.006-460.46
0-42.94
0.001 - 10.65
0-59.59
0-50.627
0.013-38.488
0.062-11.911
0.003-24.681
0001 -45 9
Number of Sampling
Days
Carbonyl
14
22
59
17
61
109
44
31
25
57
31
60
207
24
61
58
47
28
40
58
38
13
13
61
21
27
36
15
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
61
14
53
27
N/A
1
14
37
voc
14
24
N/A
19
61
114
45
32
25
58
31
59
213
25
N/A
N/A
48
30
39
N/A
39
13
21
N/A
41
27
36
15
33
27
21
37
35
60
N/A
17
54
28
21
N/A
14
38
Number
of Detects
737
708
542
627
2023
3723
1953
1119
979
2051
1139
2415
8996
1005
1304
501
2096
1335
3182
736
1492
410
681
797
1065
997
1321
451
828
478
444
1018
906
1395
714
492
2234
1211
529
11
433
1155
Number of
Samples
> Sppbv
6
19
6
25
2
8
14
27
13
15
3
69
87
25
18
2
32
10
125
4
100
8
35
0
7
13
76
20
17
10
3
3
4
10
11
7
52
48
34
3
16
7?
                   3-82

-------
Table 3-4. Geometric Means by Site
UATMP Site
A2TX
APMI
AZFL
BAPR
BUND
C2IA
CANJ
CHNJ
CLIA
CRIA
DAIA
DECO
DEMI
DMIA
DNFL
ELFL
ELNJ
EPTX
G2CO
GAFL
GJCO
GPMS
JAMS
LEFL
LOMI
MUIA
NBNJ
PGMS
PSAZ
QVAZ
RRMI
S2MO
S3MO
SFSD
SIFL
SJPR
SLCU
SLMO
SPAZ
SWMI
Geometric Mean (ppbv)
Carbonyls
4.15
4.89
3.38
1.43
2.43
2.96
2.88
2.88
3.04
3.68
3.06
9.75
3.62
3.52
5.03
2.82
3.59
2.31
12.42
3.19
11.2
6.96
2.8
3.56
5.07
3.93
5.67
3.81
N/A
N/A
27.44
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.18
0.87
5.57
3.53
N/A
26.35
Halogenated
Hydrocarbons
3.33
19.28
N/A
6.38
2.91
3.11
3.28
6.38
3.08
3.1
3.57
3.12
4.02
3.6
N/A
N/A
3.5
3.3
3.04
N/A
3.03
3.24
3.31
N/A
5.18
3.53
5.71
4.16
3.49
2.78
3.14
3.33
3.3
3.51
N/A
3.3
3.22
3.83
3.34
N/A
Hydrocarbons
4.41
4.06
N/A
10.87
1.31
2.6
5.18
5.97
3.33
2.81
3.67
10.08
5.81
4.68
N/A
N/A
8.69
7.53
10.96
N/A
21.04
7.25
18.21
N/A
5.12
2.42
16.11
18.84
7.49
1.06
6.03
4.27
4.94
2.58
N/A
10.6
8.57
11.63
8.02
N/A
Polar
2.31
3.84
N/A
9.19
2.01
1.76
2.42
1.95
3.44
.24
.66
.91
.98
.87
N/A
N/A
3.29
2.72
1.7
N/A
1.93
6.16
4.05
N/A
1.67
2.02
3.23
1.81
5.71
3.81
1.5
2.38
2.31
1.45
N/A
3.06
2.16
2.53
7.93
N/A
              3-83

-------
Table 3-4. Geometric Means by Site (Continued)
UATMP Site
TUMS
YFMI
Geometric Mean (ppbv)
Carbonyls
3.21
3.34
Halogenated
Hydrocarbons
2.7
3.62
Hydrocarbons
4.26
10.87
Polar
3.69
1.43
                   3-84

-------
       Table 3-5. Summary of Pearson Correlation Coefficients for Selected Meteorological Parameters and Prevalent Compounds
Prevalent Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
EthylBenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.03
-0.08
0.07
0.01
0.07
-0.02
0.16
0.17
0.16
0.17
0.04
0.17
0.05
0 18
Average
Temperature
0.02
-0.04
0.06
0.04
0.06
-0.03
0.09
0.12
0.08
0.19
0.05
0.10
0.07
0 14
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.06
-0.29
-0.09
0.01
0.09
-0.02
0.07
0.05
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.07
0.05
006
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.02
-0.15
0.00
0.03
0.07
-0.03
0.09
0.08
0.09
0.12
0.06
0.09
0.07
0 11
Relative
Humidity
-0.10
-0.32
-0.20
-0.03
0.02
-0.01
-0.08
-0.13
-0.07
-0.23
0.02
-0.10
-0.02
-0 14
u-component
of wind speed
-0.01
-0.02
-0.09
0.03
-0.07
-0.01
-0.10
-0.04
-0.10
-0.03
0.06
-0.12
0.13
-0 11
v-component
of wind speed
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.09
0.02
-0.05
0.05
-0.05
0.00
0.00
-0.05
0.10
-001
OJ
oo

-------
Table 3-6. Summary of Mobile Information by Site
UATMP
Site
A2TX
APMI
AZFL
BAPR
BUND
C2IA
CANJ
CHNJ
CLIA
CPJA
DAIA
DECO
DEMI
DMIA
DNFL
E7MI
ELFL
ELNJ
EPTX
G2CO
GAFL
GJCO
GPMS
JAMS
LEFL
LOMI
MUIA
NBNJ
PGMS
PSAZ
QVAZ
RRMI
S2MO
S3MO
SFSD
SIFL
SJPR
SLCU
SLMO
SPAZ
Estimated No
of Motor
Vehicles
Owned
534,416
764,968
441,735
N/A
4,591
129,045
1,564,196
176,913
31,433
129,746
203,328
933,463
918,346
280,507
335,027
854,602
366,638
1,549,285
313,381
75,650
339,325
82,425
131,375
196,492
436,419
825,470
25,127
622,933
43,835
971,853
64,642
669,779
597,918
536,990
109,862
497,391
N/A
606,580
597,918
597,424
Estimated
Traffic
17,472
60,000
51,000
10
1,350
1,500
62,000
12,623
500
15,600
1,000
44,200
12,791
12,400
16,281
6,999
14,000
170,000
3,790
2,200
81,460
10,000
17,000
12,500
1,055
100,000
2,800
63,000
8,600
250
200
500
1,000
8,532
4,320
18,700
51,000
20,485
15,014
50,000
County-Level
On-Road
Emissions
8,707
10,742
4,469
174
78
1,129
2,680
2,680
183
1,129
988
2,943
11,162
2,526
4,469
10,742
4,469
2,097
2,730
785
4,537
785
1,550
1,881
4,537
11,162
148
3,708
1,030
11,725
740
10,742
2,609
2,609
859
4,537
3,084
5,530
2,609
11,725
County-Level
Non-Road
Emissions
1,662
1,884
1,241
88
57
213
445
962
69
213
201
891
4,537
653
1,241
1,884
1,241
513
505
178
1,455
178
605
229
1,455
4,537
48
962
366
5,925
267
1,884
288
288
178
1,455
1,671
1,651
288
5,925
Hydrocarbon
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
4.41
4.06
N/A
10.81
1.31
2.6
5.18
5.97
3.33
2.81
3.67
10.08
5.81
4.63
N/A
N/A
N/A
8.69
7.53
10.96
N/A
21.04
7.25
18.21
N/A
5.12
2.42
16.11
18.34
7.49
1.06
6.03
4.27
4.94
2.58
N/A
10.6
8.57
11.63
8.02
                     3-86

-------
Table 3-6. Summary of Mobile Information by Site (Continued)

UATMP
Site
SWMI
TUMS
YFMI
Estimated No
of Motor
Vehicles
Owned
885,315
52,526
885,315

Estimated
Traffic
18,437
4,900
500

County-Level
On-Road
Emissions
10,742
342
10,742

County-Level
Non-Road
Emissions
1,884
86
1,884

Hydrocarbon
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
N/A
4.26
10.87
                          3-87

-------
4.0    Sites in Arizona
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
three UATMP sites in Arizona (PSAZ, QVAZ, and SPAZ). All three of these sites reside in the
Phoenix metropolitan statistical area. Figures 4-1 through 4-3 are topographical maps showing
the monitoring stations in their urban locations. Figures 4-4 and 4-5 are maps identifying
facilities within ten miles of the sites and that reported to the 1999 NEI. The PSAZ and SPAZ
sites are close to each other and are surrounded by numerous industries, while the QVAZ site has
only two nearby industries. PSAZ and SPAZ are surrounded mostly by four types of industries:
electronic/computer equipment manufacturers, fabricated metal product manufacturers, and
utility companies.  QVAZ is nearest to an unknown industry and one stone/glass/clay or concrete
manufacturer.

       Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at two weather stations near
these sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements. The two weather stations are Phoenix-Sky Harbor and Phoenix-
Deer Valley (WBAN 23183 and 3184, respectively).

       Table 4-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of these sites, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days. Normally, the Phoenix  area is
extremely hot and dry, and the high average temperature and low average relative humidity
values in Table 4-1 also confirm this observation.  Wind speeds were also very light for each site,
as the city resides in a valley, but the wind generally flow from the south and east.  This
information can be found at the following web site:
http: //www. s sec. or g/i di s/gates/States/phy si cal/phoenix. htm.

4.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Arizona Sites
       Carbonyl  compounds  were not measured at any of the three sites, as indicated in Tables
3-3 and 3-4. PSAZ and SPAZ each had hydrocarbon compounds geometric means more than

                                          4-1

-------
double their halogenated hydrocarbon geometric means (7.49 ppbv vs. 3.49 ppbv and 8.02 ppbv
vs. 3.34 ppbv, respectively). QVAZ measured the lowest geometric mean for hydrocarbons at
1.06 ppbv.  The average total UATMP daily concentration at QVAZ was also lower compared to
the other two sites and was computed to be 11.05 ppbv (±4.46) at QVAZ; at PSAZ, the value
was nearly double (20.98 ppbv ±3.28) and at SPAZ, the value was nearly triple (30.99 ppbv
±7.98).  Table 4-1 also lists the averages for selected meteorological parameters from January
2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time period covered in this report.

       Tables 4-2a-c are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of
the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site. Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report.  At PSAZ, all of the correlations are
negative, with the exception of methyl ethyl ketone.  Maximum and average temperatures had
weak negative correlations, whereas the moisture parameters had relatively stronger negative
correlations. Acetylene, benzene, ethylbenzene, m-,p-xy\ene, o-xylene, propylene,  and toluene
all had at least one correlation which was considered strong (less than -0.50 or greater than 0.50).
The v-components of the wind speed were all negative for each of the fourteen compounds. The
prevalent compounds generally increase when the moisture and wind speeds are decreasing.

       At QVAZ, the correlations were not as strong (none were less than -0.50 or greater than
0.50). The  strongest correlation was for methyl ethyl ketone with wet bulb temperature and o-
xylene with average temperature (-0.33).  The weak correlations across the temperature,
moisture, and wind information make  it difficult to ascertain when UATMP concentrations will
increase.

       Similar to PSAZ, the SPAZ site had nearly all negative correlations.  The strongest
correlation was the v-component of the wind speed and toluene (-0.59). Acetylene,
dichlorodifluoromethane, ethylbenzene, m-,p-xy\ene, o-xylene, and toluene all had at least one
correlation which was considered strong (less than -0.50 or greater than 0.50). The prevalent
compounds generally increase when the moisture and wind speeds are decreasing.
                                          4-2

-------
4.2    Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
the this report is 0.74 motor vehicles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more
information on this ratio).  Hence, the population near the PSAZ site is 1,313,315 people, all of
whom are operating approximately 971,853 vehicles.  A population of 807,330 people is driving
597,424 motor vehicles near the SPAZ site, while a considerably lower population of 87,354
people are driving 64,642 vehicles near the QVAZ site. This information is compared to the
average daily concentration of the prevalent compounds at each Arizona site in Table 4-3.  Also
included in Table 4-3 is average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of
cars passing the monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites. The three Arizona sites all had higher toluene-ethylbenzene
ratios than the roadside study, with QVAZ having the more than double the toluene-ethylbenzene
ratio of the roadside study.  QVAZ also had a higher benzene-ethylbenzene ratio than the
roadside study, while SPAZ and PSAZ's were both lower than the roadside study. The m-,p-
xylene-ethylbenzene concentration ratios for all three sites were lower than the roadside study's
ratios, and the o-xylene-ethylbenzene ratios were all just slightly lower than the roadside study
ratios. With the exception of QVAZ's toluene-ethylbenzene concentration ratio, the BTEX ratios
of the Arizona sites resemble the ratios of the roadside study.
                                           4-3

-------
             Figure 4-1. Phoenix, Arizona Site 1 (PSAZ) Monitoring Station
                       *?<:.-

                           :-    -
                         ;   • ,-<:'• '-i
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        4-4

-------
            Figure 4-2. Phoenix, Arizona Site 2 (QVAZ) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        4-5

-------
             Figure 4-3. Phoenix, Arizona Site 3 (SPAZ) Monitoring Station
                   	      i
                   -^
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        4-6

-------
Figure 4-4. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of PSAZ and SPAZ
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of PSAZ
and SPAZ
* PSAZ Site
A. SPAZ Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Mining and Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals, Except Fuels (3)
B Food and Kindred Products (2)
D Furniture and Fixtures (6)
E Paper and Allied Products (2)
F Chemicals and Allied Products (13)
G Rubber and M i seel laneous P I astics P roducts (17)
H Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products (6)
I P rim ary M etal I ndustries (1 7)
J Fabricated M etal P rod ., E xcpt . M achi nery and T rans. E qui p . (23)
K E lectronic a Other E I ec. E quip . & C om ps, E xcpt . C om p . E quip . (27)
L Transportation Equipment (9)
M Mi seel laneous Manufacturing I ndustries (4)
N E I ectri c, Gas , and Sanitary S ervi ces (20)
O Wholesale Trade-durable Goods (2)
P Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (15)
O Hotels, Rooming Houses, Camps, and Other Lodging Places (1)
R Business S ervi ces (2)
S Mi seel laneous R epair Servi ces (2)
T Membership Organizations (4)
U Unknown Industrial Classification (3)






Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
displayed may not equal the num ber of facilities in parantheses above
J 	 1
r
f •
£L-^__^^^
Arizona




































/
}
i






I



y
[
\
\
\
M\
N \




\
\






/^
,s
/
/
7
i i
NA

^^--~
_-^1-
j^
/ 1 |
/



P
P1
I
' H
\ E
\
\L
^v

V
^^-




*^~^~ N








— ~~ ~~ ~


F
	 p 	 I 	 * 	

U
J

L
O
F
N G J
F R c ,
F NJ
P G
K *•

J
"*--- 	

-^___ 	 .




]r^^^-.
^^~







^--^^^
^^^x^^
T ^^x



J


U
J L K
L
G M
G

K N
^^

1





v
^v
\v
\
\
\
\
\
\
\


\ n
\
\ J /
\ f
\ !
U \ ,, /
\ 7

M K v
L **~AX\
Of
V? K
/
/
3 4 Miles
I






























I




-------
                                       Figure 4-5.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of QVAZ
oo
            Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of QVAZ
              •   QVAC Site
            Source Categories (Number of Facilities)
            A Stone, G lass , Cl ay and Concrete P roducts (1)
            B Unknown Industrial Classification (1)
                                                         Arizona
                                                                                                     01   234 Miles
                                                                                                      I	
                                                                        4-8

-------
                    Table 4-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for sites in Arizona
 Site
Name
Type
   Average
   UATMP
Concentration
   (ppbv)
                          Average
                          Maximum
                        Temperature
  Average
Temperature
  Average
  Dewpoint
Temperature
Average Wet
    Bulb
Temperature
 Average
 Relative
Humidity
Average u-
component
  of the
  Wind
   (kts)
Average v-
component
  of the
  Wind
   (kts)
PSAZ
 All
2001
                    87.03
                   (±1.75)
   74.10
   (±1.71)
41.93 (±1.09)
    56.18
   (±1.04)
  35.03
 (±1.70)
   -0.15
  (±0.27)
   0.84
  (±0.22)
         sample
          day
           20.98
           (±3.28)
                    96.22
                   (±3.59)
    82.50
   (±3.67)
    45.10
   (±4.00)
    61.07
   (±2.57)
  28.65
 (±3.93)
   0.25
  (±1.01)
    1.20
  (±0.63)
QVAZ
 All
2001
                    89.68
                   (±1.76)
   77.41
   (±1.71)
    43.49
   (±1.09)
    58.27
   (±1.00)
  34.61
 (±1.67)
   -0.34
  (±0.33)
   0.90
  (±0.13)
         sample
          day
            11.05
           (±4.46)
                    99.96
                   (±2.68)
    87.50
   (±2.52)
    50.15
   (±3.79)
    65.17
   (±2.07)
  30.66
 (±4.17)
   -0.20
  (±1.11)
   0.71
  (±0.43)
SPAZ
 All
2001
                    87.03
                   (±1.75)
   74.10
   (±1.71)
    41.93
   (±1.09)
    56.18
   (±1.04)
  35.03
 (±1.70)
   -0.15
  (±0.27)
   0.84
  (±0.22)
         sample
          day
            30.99
           (±7.98)
                    94.18
                   (±4.68)
    80.13
   (±4.51)
    42.40
   (±4.87)
   59.14
   (±3.22)
  27.74
 (±3.78)
   -0.47
  (±1.31)
   0.60
  (±0.67)

-------
Table 4-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Supersite in
                                         Phoenix, Arizona (PSAZ)
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.20
-0.19
-0.17
-0.12
-0.19
-0.19
0.14
-0.08
-0.18
-0.19
-0.22
Average
Temperature
-0.22
-0.21
-0.20
-0.16
-0.19
-0.19
0.06
-0.14
-0.19
-0.19
-0.21
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.57
-0.47
0.09
-0.20
-0.50
-0.50
0.31
-0.39
-0.50
-0.45
-0.46
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.45
-0.40
-0.03
-0.19
-0.40
-0.40
0.23
-0.32
-0.40
-0.37
-0.39
Relative
Humidity
-0.36
-0.28
0.26
-0.04
-0.33
-0.33
0.25
-0.26
-0.34
-0.27
-0.27
u-component of
wind speed
-0.39
-0.37
-0.16
-0.26
-0.36
-0.37
0.00
-0.15
-0.37
-0.34
-0.29
v-component of
wind speed
-0.53
-0.52
-0.20
-0.40
-0.55
-0.54
-0.01
-0.37
-0.54
-0.52
-0.57

-------
Table 4-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Queen Valley in
                                          Phoenix, Arizona (QVAZ)
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.12
0.06
0.02
0.19
-0.06
-0.02
0.05
-0.16
0.05
0.25
0.29
Average
Temperature
-0.35
-0.21
-0.11
0.20
-0.23
-0.24
-0.15
-0.13
-0.33
0.10
0.18
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.01
-0.08
-0.02
0.08
0.02
0.01
-0.32
0.19
-0.17
0.10
0.28
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.17
-0.18
-0.09
0.12
-0.10
-0.11
-0.33
0.09
-0.28
0.10
0.27
Relative
Humidity
0.10
-0.03
-0.07
-0.10
0.10
0.08
-0.28
0.26
0.00
-0.02
0.10
u-component of
wind speed
-0.23
0.07
-0.01
0.14
0.13
0.19
-0.04
0.14
0.02
0.19
0.29
v-component of
wind speed
-0.27
0.00
-0.09
-0.20
0.04
-0.05
0.20
0.01
-0.07
0.30
0.17

-------
               Table 4-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                South Phoenix, Arizona (SPAZ)
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.34
-0.28
-0.24
-0.12
-0.18
-0.22
-0.08
-0.19
-0.22
-0.26
-0.12
Average
Temperature
-0.32
-0.23
-0.17
-0.19
-0.15
-0.18
0.03
0.05
-0.20
-0.24
-0.05
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.57
-0.49
-0.41
-0.47
-0.49
-0.49
-0.21
-0.28
-0.47
-0.46
-0.51
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.50
-0.41
-0.33
-0.38
-0.37
-0.39
-0.09
-0.13
-0.38
-0.40
-0.32
Relative
Humidity
-0.33
-0.33
-0.26
-0.34
-0.39
-0.36
-0.16
-0.30
-0.33
-0.30
-0.48
u-component of
wind speed
-0.17
-0.18
-0.28
-0.21
-0.16
-0.17
-0.02
-0.19
-0.14
-0.12
-0.25
v-component of
wind speed
-0.35
-0.44
-0.42
-0.53
-0.56
-0.53
-0.19
-0.32
-0.52
-0.33
-0.59
to

-------
Table 4-3. Motor Vehicle Information vs Daily Concentration for Arizona
                           Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
PSAZ
QVAZ
SPAZ
Population
within Ten
Miles
1,313,315
87,354
807,330
Estimated
Number of
Vehicles Owned
971,853
64,642
597,424
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
250
200
50,000
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
20.98(±3.28)ppbv
11.05(±4.46)ppbv
30.99 (±7.98) ppbv
                                4-13

-------
5.0    Sites in Colorado
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
three UATMP sites in Colorado (DECO, G2CO, and GJCO). Two of the three sites reside in
Grand Junction;  the other is located in Denver. Figures 5-1 through 5-3 are topographical maps
showing the monitoring stations in their urban locations. Figures 5-4 and 5-5 are maps
identifying facilities within ten miles of the sites that reported to the 1999 NEI. The DECO site
is surrounded by numerous industries, with the majority of the facilities to the south and east. A
large number of facilities fall into three categories: automobile dealers and gas stations;
automobile repair;  and personal services. The G2CO site is to the south of GJCO and is
surrounded by fewer industrial sites, most of which are automobile dealerships or gas stations.

        Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at two weather stations near
these sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements.  The two weather stations are Denver-Centennial and Grand
Junction (WBAN 93067 and 23066, respectively).

       Table 5-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of the sites, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity),  and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the  wind) for the entire year and on sampling days.  Climatologically, the Denver
area is rather dry, as the relative humidity in Table 5-1 indicates, and the daily temperatures can
fluctuate drastically between the seasons, with rather cold winters and warm summers. Wind
speeds can vary for the site, but wind flows from the south-southwest on average. Grand
Junction is slightly warmer than Denver, as the average maximum and average temperature
indicate in Table 5-1. Grand Junction tends to be just as dry, but moderate winds blow from the
southeast on average. This information can be found at the following web site:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/denver.htm.
                                           5-1

-------
5.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Colorado Sites
       Carbonyl and hydrocarbon compounds consistently had the highest geometric means for
all three sites in Colorado. Polar compound geometric means ranged between 1.7 ppbv (G2CO)
and 1.93 ppbv (GJCO), halogenated hydrocarbon geometric means ranged from 3.03 ppbv
(GJCO) to 3.12 ppbv (DECO), and carbonyl geometric means ranged from 9.75 ppbv (DECO) to
12.42 ppbv (G2CO) among the sites.  The hydrocarbon geometric means varied the greatest,
between 10.08 ppbv (DECO) and 21.04 ppbv (GJCO).  The average total UATMP daily
concentration at the sites also varied greatly, between 35.16 ±7.65 (DECO) and 76.87 ±16.95
(G2CO).  Table 5-1 also lists the averages for selected meteorological parameters from January
2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time period covered in this report. The DECO
site also opted to have total and speciated nonmethane organic compounds (SNMOC) sampled
during its air toxic sampling. SNMOC/NMOC compounds are of particular interest because of
their role in ozone formation.  Readers are encouraged to review EPA's 2001 Nonmethane
Organic Compounds (NMOC) and Speciated Nonmethane Organic Compounds (SNMOC)
Monitoring Program, Final Report (EPA, 2002) for more information on SNMOC/NMOC
trends and concentrations. The average total NMOC value for DECO was 362 ppbC (±50.64), of
which nearly 72% could be identified through speciation.  Of the speciated compounds, ethane
measured the highest concentration at the DECO site (24.67 ppbC). Typical sources of ethane
include production of insulating materials and from cooking oils such as shortening. This
information is given in Table 5-3. Unfortunately, ozone concentrations were not sampled at any
of these sites.

       Tables 5-2a-c present the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each
of the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site. Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. At DECO, the majority of the
correlations are positive. While the majority of correlations are relatively weak, chloromethane
had the strongest (strong meaning a correlation between 0.50 and 0.75 or -0.50 and 0.75)
correlations with maximum and average temperatures (0.61 and 0.55, respectively), wet bulb
temperature (0.54), and relative humidity (-0.52). Dichlorodifluoromethane had similar yet
slightly weaker correlations.

                                         5-2

-------
       Prevalent compounds at the G2CO and GJCO sites also had mostly weak correlations that
tended to be more positive than negative. Formaldehyde had the strongest correlation at both
sites with average temperature (0.55 and 0.53 respectively), but also had strong positive
correlations with maximum temperature and wet bulb temperature at G2CO. Acetone returned a
high correlation with the u-component of the wind at the G2CO site (0.50), but failed to do so at
GJCO. Both maximum and average temperatures returned a fair number (5) of moderately
strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and -0.50) correlations at the G2CO  site, but varied
between positive and negative.

5.2    Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of cars
operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established.  The ratio used in this report
is 0.74 automobiles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information on this ratio).
Hence, the population near the DECO site is 1,261,437 people, all of whom are operating
approximately 933,463 vehicles. A population of 111,385 people is driving 82,425 automobiles
near the GJCO site, while a slightly lower population of 102,230 people is driving 75,650
vehicles near the G2CO site.  This information is compared to the average daily concentration of
the prevalent compounds at each Colorado site in Table 5-4. Also included in Table 5-4 are
average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars passing the
monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.)  Figure 3-16 depicts  the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites.  The DECO site had higher toluene-ethylbenzene ratios than the
roadside study, while the two Grand Junction sites' ratios were lower.  Overall, both G2CO and
GJCO's concentration ratios were very similar to the roadside  study. DECO's benzene-
ethylbenzene ratio is higher than its m-,/?-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio, which is different from that
of the roadside study.

                                           5-3

-------
               Figure 5-1. Denver, Colorado (DECO) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        5-4

-------
       Figure 5-2. Grand Junction, Colorado Site 1 (G2CO) Monitoring Station
                   . -     ;!..^.,
                         II   SP&F1^
                       . .^.V: •••
                        ^- !;,;--•   •>-
   ~
  AY"--'             ..::}:!
&$    .    •  ' •<-•- •=••-      •••"•-:-:

                   y.  xs     - :
                         \-   "
                         :
                                               S •
                                                ,
                                                •
    ,
  '•, -^-\;           '    ..;••;
          «r-   *V
                 i
;-::.::•,:
   ..., . ...-
  .  mm  •
.... c .-M-f  "f-

                i
                             -
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                    5-5

-------
        Figure 5-3. Grand Junction, Colorado Site 2 (GJCO) Monitoring Station
    ^""•"••'t^t
     _ ~r--
  ^^
 \ : •—-•'
         . ,
' S.. .  -v^^-"-   - .
                                 77—**•' *.":
                                           ••^^.  -'--,
                                                    i?«    .1;,  -c'  ;* -  -  ;
       r
        .
       ^>x^     ..   ,:r^lS
   fl    S-l^S<&b£A$&?J» -"-•:;::
                      .   :,;;::?i
                         :;:::.:.:'.' _y- -v    r
                                           * •.'"'«--•" ;;  ^-^ C'w.m^.c».^^.l.s7rr
            -.•• .. •   •.•™-**      .-:r'
          •--.: , -: -^ ,«   I  .   f
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                     5-6

-------
Figure 5-4.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DECO
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DECO
• DECO Site
So urce Cat ego ly (N umber of Facilities)
! Health Services (19)
# Alternative Dealers a Gasoline Srvc. Stas. (391)
$ Alternative Repair, Services, and Parking (115)
% Hotels, Rmng. Houses, Camps, & Othr. Ldgng. (1)
a Business Services (1 6)
0 National Security and International Affairs (2)
* Educational Services (2)
+ Eng., Accruing., Res., Mngmnt., a Rel. Srvcs. (B)
, Local a Suburban Trans, a Intrbn. Hghwy. Pass. Trans. (1 )
-Motor Freigrt Transportation and Warehousing (1)
/Amusement and Recreation Sen/ices (1)
1 P rim ary M etal I ndustries (8)
2 Mine and Quarry of Nonm etal Min., Excpt. FIs. (3)
s Public Finance, Taxation, and Monetary Policy (1)
= Executive, Legislative, and Gen. Gov., Excpl. Fin. (1 )
> Adm inistration of H um an R esource P rog . (2)
? U nknovrfi I ndustri al C lassification (11)
@ P ersonal Ser vi ces (1 89)
A Oil and Gas Extraction (5)
C Food and Kindred Products (10)
D Textile Mill Products (1)
E Limber and Wood Products, Except Furniture (11)
F Furniture and Fixtures (14)
G Paper and Allied Products (8)
H Printing, Publishing, and Allied Industries (64)
I Chemicals and Allied Predicts (20)
J Petroleum Refining and Related I ndustries (16)
K Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (25)
L Leather and Leather P roducts (1 )
N Fabricated Metal Prods., Excpt. Machinery a Trans. Equip. (41)
O Ind. a Comm. Machinery a Comp. Equip. (10)
P Elec. & Other Elect. Equip. & Comps., Excpt. Comp. Equip. (2)
Q Transportation Equipment (8)
R Miscellaneous Manufacturing I ndustries (6)
S Railroad Transportation (1)
T Corn muni cations (13)
U E I ectri c, Gas , and Sanitary S ervi ces (31 )
V Wholesale Trade-durable Goods (7)
X Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (1 6)
Y Building Materials, Hrdw., Gard. Supply, & Mob. Home Dlrs. (1)
Z Food Stores (71)
D Nondassifiable Establishments (9)
\Meas., Arlyz., a Contr.lnstr.; Photo., Med. a Opt. Gds.; Clks(S)
"• M i seel laneous R epair S ervi ces (8)
0 Adm in. of Env. Quality and Housing Programs (2)
- Justice, Public Order, and Safety (1)
Note: Dueto facilily density andcolocalion.lhelolal facililies
eisplaved mav not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above


*


I
H
\








/ *
/ # «
/ j
/
A* ft @®#*
p A NO** 11
" 0 5 S S # @
N ** V# *
## # #
*2N*A@*
\ @ * #
^






^^^-@srri
X $ @ y # # 2
Jf # © "
j * # Q e
'* * "-H$ J
*@ ### ZH JZ#
@ # @T
@ *$ if Z# t-
ffi> # # T f,
^Z> @ 7Q *J-
E!* @* * @ \
u A U # ^







itf (S|
N II U «=
i) u N u IE
# N ? U * #
J QQ| ,R K? A* $
Zjf* C $ I I-,
-jl j (ffl) t\l 1 /
#*$ $H* cV# #H ^
O? # | ! " *@
@*zzT!#l:i j# T *
j # #^ # # i (S
i * @ # @« *
p @@MZ #@
®® @@ ^^^

012;
i i i





-?N
z u
m
( S
H #KNK QN^Jj^
^?Z52 Z$ »
' Z * @a#H
o o $ #
Sa ^ @ ^@# ^
fy @©JI
'# # ## @@(£0
j,## # X

4 Miles
I






H#H\
*°X
# 'z
# od
# # f
?/




                         5-7

-------
                                          Figure 5-5.  Facilities  Located Within  10 Miles  of G2CO and GJCO
oo
Facilities Located Within  10 Miles of G2CO
and GJCO

  A  G2COSite
  *  GJCO Site

Source Categories (Number of Facilities)
A Oil and G as E xtraction (2)
B Mining and Quarrying of NonmetallicMinerals, Except Fuels(1)
C Construction Special Trade Contractors (1)
D Textile Mill Products (1)
E Lumber and Wood Products, Except Furniture (1)
F Chemicals and Allied Products (3)
G Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (4)
H Stone, C lay, G lass, and C oncrete P roducts (2)
I Fabricated Metal Prod., Excpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (5)
J Industrial and  Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (1)
K Transportation By Air (2)
LTransportation Services(1)
M Communications (1)
N Electric, Gas, snd Sanitary Services (1)
O Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods(7)
P Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations (47)
Q Personal Services (B)
R Business S ervi ess (2)
S Automotive Repair, Services, and Parking (5)
T Health Services (2)
U Engineering, Accounting, Research, Mngmnt., Rel. Servs. (1)
VNondassi liable Establishments (1)
WUnknown Industrial Classification (1)
               Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
               displayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above
                                                                                                                                      01234 Miles
                                                                                                                                      I    I    I    I

-------
Table 5-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Colorado
Site
Name

DECO


G2CO


GJCO


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



35.16
(±7.65)


76.87
(±16.95)


65.75
(±20.49)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

66.14
(±1.97)
67.85
(±4.56)
70.93
(±2.70)
83.42
(±3.87)
70.93
(±2.07)
84.91
(±3.86)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

48.17
(±1.74)
50.81
(±4.03)
54.64
(±1.95)
65.68
(±3.70)
54.64
(±1.95)
66.13
(±3.70)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

27.74 (±1.22)

28.24
(±2.80)
29.45
(±1.12)
33.74
(±3.01)
29.45
(±1.12)
33.98
(±3.06)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

38.18 (±1.26)

39.85
(±2.84)
42.08
(±1.28)
49.01
(±2.34)
42.08
(±1.28)
49.29
(±7.65)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

44.44
(±1.44)
43.75
(±3.70)
41.34
(±1.79)
34.23
(±4.93)
41.34
(±1.79)
34.06
(±5.06)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

0.28
(±0.26)
0.21
(±0.65)
-1.69
(±0.29)
-2.03
(±0.76)
-1.69
(±0.29)
-1.98
(±0.77)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

1.58
(±0.39)
1.90
(±0.87)
0.66
(±0.26)
1.23
(±0.60)
0.66
(±0.26)
1.19
(±0.61)

-------
Table 5-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                   Denver, Colorado (DECO)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.01
-0.20
-0.20
0.14
0.61
0.54
0.17
0.14
0.14
0.01
0.24
0.11
0.07
0.24
Average
Temperature
0.07
-0.13
-0.26
0.09
0.55
0.49
0.14
0.20
0.09
0.06
0.27
0.08
0.03
0.18
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.02
-0.31
-0.38
-0.11
0.38
0.30
-0.06
0.17
-0.15
0.04
0.06
-0.13
-0.16
-0.05
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.05
-0.19
-0.30
0.05
0.54
0.47
0.11
0.19
0.03
0.08
0.23
0.04
-0.01
0.13
Relative
Humidity
0.05
0.02
0.02
-0.20
-0.52
-0.43
-0.21
0.02
-0.25
0.07
-0.30
-0.19
-0.18
-0.27
u-component of
wind speed
-0.11
-0.11
0.17
0.14
0.10
0.05
0.15
-0.16
0.18
0.09
0.09
0.15
0.17
0.11
v-component of
wind speed
0.26
0.22
0.18
0.23
0.07
-0.01
0.22
0.19
0.25
-0.05
0.23
0.23
0.21
0.17

-------
Table 5-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                             Grand Junction, Colorado Site 2 (G2CO)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.22
-0.37
-0.33
-0.39
-0.02
-0.19
0.16
0.54
0.21
0.32
0.03
0.27
-0.35
0.02
Average
Temperature
0.24
-0.26
-0.30
-0.33
0.15
-0.12
0.24
0.55
0.28
0.27
0.20
0.35
-0.32
0.15
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.15
-0.20
0.09
-0.16
0.26
0.11
-0.01
0.35
0.01
0.16
0.30
0.15
-0.01
0.05
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.10
-0.27
-0.16
-0.31
0.24
-0.04
0.17
0.53
0.21
0.26
0.28
0.31
-0.23
0.15
Relative
Humidity
-0.38
0.18
0.35
0.19
-0.01
0.16
-0.26
-0.34
-0.30
-0.21
0.08
-0.26
0.27
-0.08
u-component of
wind speed
0.26
0.50
0.06
0.17
0.05
-0.01
0.22
-0.02
0.19
0.01
0.06
0.04
0.12
0.15
v-component of
wind speed
-0.20
-0.41
-0.20
-0.24
0.19
0.07
-0.02
0.20
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.19
-0.22
-0.13

-------
               Table 5-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                            Grand Junction, Colorado Site 1 (GJCO)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.21
0.08
0.45
-0.10
-0.07
-0.07
-0.18
0.36
-0.17
-0.02
0.06
-0.19
-0.42
-0.23
Average
Temperature
0.34
0.28
0.42
-0.03
-0.09
-0.01
-0.10
0.53
-0.09
-0.22
0.07
-0.11
-0.38
-0.17
Dew Point
Temperature
0.00
-0.01
0.27
0.03
-0.01
0.11
-0.07
0.20
-0.06
-0.05
0.09
-0.08
-0.17
-0.11
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.27
0.22
0.40
-0.01
-0.08
0.05
-0.08
0.49
-0.06
-0.17
0.11
-0.09
-0.35
-0.14
Relative
Humidity
-0.26
-0.22
-0.18
0.05
0.07
0.01
0.06
-0.30
0.05
0.18
0.02
0.06
0.23
0.11
u-component of
wind speed
0.15
0.12
-0.40
-0.07
-0.03
-0.36
0.27
0.03
0.27
0.15
-0.15
0.27
0.07
0.26
v-component of
wind speed
-0.01
-0.10
0.36
0.03
-0.17
0.26
-0.19
0.12
-0.19
-0.31
0.09
-0.20
-0.16
-0.20
to

-------
Table 5-3. TNMOC Measured by the Denver, CO (DECO) Monitoring Station
Average
TNMOC
(speciated)
261 ppbC
(±32.44)
Average
TNMOC
(w/unknowns)
362 ppbC
(±50.64)
TNMOC
Identified
72%
SNMOC Compound
with the Highest
Concentration
Ethane (24.67 ppbC)
Typical Emissions
Sources
Production of
insulating materials;
shortening and
cooking oils
                                  5-13

-------
Table 5-4. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Colorado
                           Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
DECO
G2CO
GJCO
Population
within Ten
Miles
1,261,437
102,230
111,385
Estimated
Number of
MotorVehicles
Owned
933,463
75,650
82,425
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
44,200
2,200
10,000
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
35.16(±7.65)ppbv
76.87 (±16.95) ppbv
65.75(±20.49)ppbv
                                 5-14

-------
6.0    Sites in Florida
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the six
UATMP sites in Florida (AZFL, DNFL, ELFL, GAFL, LEFL, and SIFL). Three of these sites
reside in St. Petersburg, while the other three reside to the east in Tampa. Figures 6-1 through 6-
6 are topographical maps showing the monitoring stations in their urban locations.  Figure 6-7 is
a map identifying facilities within ten miles of the sites and that reported to the 1999 NEI. The
St. Petersburg sites (ELFL, DNFL, and AZFL) are oriented somewhat north to south, as are the
Tampa sites (LEFL, GAFL, and SIFL), just shifted further east.  The majority of the industrial
facilities are located between DNFL, AZFL, and GAFL, and between GAFL and LEFL.  The
fewest facilities surround SIFL and ELFL. These facilities cover a wide range of industries
including, but not limited to power/utility companies, transportation equipment, and wholesale
trade-non-durable goods manufacturing.

       Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at three weather stations near
these sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with  ambient air
concentration measurements.  The three weather stations are Tampa-International,  St. Petersburg,
and New Port Ritchie (WBAN 12842, 92806, and 92802, respectively).

       Table 6-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of the sites, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days. The Tampa/St.  Petersburg
area resides on Florida's Gulf Coast and its climate is considered subtropical.  As Table 6-1
confirms, the area is warm and moist, with an annual average maximum temperature in the 80s
and relative humidity in the 60 to 70 percent range.  Light to moderate winds generally flow from
the north and east.  This information can be found at the following web sites:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/orlando.htm and
http://meetings.sixcontinentshotels.com/destinations/tampa/weather.html.
                                          6-1

-------
6.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Florida Sites
       Only carbonyl compounds were measured at the six sites, as indicated in Tables 3-3 and
3-4.  Geometric means of the carbonyl compounds ranged from 2.82 ppbv (ELFL) to 5.03 ppbv
(DNFL), while the average daily UATMP concentration had a greater range of 3.84 ±0.42 ppbv
(ELFL) to 18.34 ±7.32 ppbv (DNFL).  Table 6-1 also lists the averages for selected
meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time
period covered in this report.

       Tables 6-2a-f are the summary of calculated Pearson  Correlation coefficients for each of
the prevalent carbonyl compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site. Identification
of the prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. Formaldehyde is consistently
moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and -0.50) to strongly (between 0.50 and 0.75
or -0.50 and -0.75) and positively correlated with maximum temperature across all of the sites,
with the exception of ELFL (0.19 correlation).  Formaldehyde concentrations generally increased
with increasing maximum temperature. Acetone had moderately strong to strong negative
correlations with average maximum temperature at all sites, and with the v-component of the
wind at all but one site (DNFL).  The majority of all correlations with acetone were negative,
regardless of the strength of the correlation. Concentrations  of acetone generally decreased as
temperature, moisture content, and winds increased. Acetaldehyde's greatest correlation across
all sites except LEFL and DNFL was a moderately strong negative correlation with both wind
components.  Other correlations were generally weak (between 0 and 0.25 or 0 and -0.25) and
varied between  positive and negative at the St. Petersburg sites (AZFL, DNFL, and ELFL).
However, the Tampa sites of LEFL and SIFL had moderately strong negative correlations with
the moisture variables. Relative humidity at LEFL and SIFL (-0.28 at both sites), and both dew
point and wet bulb temperatures at SIFL (-0.27 and -0.24) demonstrated this correlation with
acetaldehyde. Acetaldehyde concentrations generally decreased as moisture content and wind
speed increased.
                                          6-2

-------
6.2    Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 automobiles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information on
this ratio).  The population is the highest near the SIFL site, with 672,150 people operating
approximately 497,391 vehicles. The lowest population of the Florida sites is near DNFL, where
452,739 people are driving 335,027 automobiles. This information is compared to the average
daily concentration of the prevalent compounds at each Florida site in Table 6-3. Also included
in Table 6-3 is average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars passing
the monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites.  As the Florida sites only measured carbonyl compounds, these
six sites are not included in
Figure 3-16.
                                           6-3

-------
             Figure 6-1 St. Petersburg, Florida (AZFL) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        6-4

-------
          Figure 6-2 St. Petersburg, Florida Site 2 (DNFL) Monitoring Station
             •HL/   - -   ">  ' I ^ I I      r *'l
                         VW rl^V^Pl '
               •   -  .  •  i      iMiEaLiL

                     i:^*1-
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                      6-5

-------
           Figure 6-3 St. Petersburg, Florida Site 3 (ELFL) Monitoring Station
              -JC,
           \
     '   •
   •'.  ,
   i -:        i , -,



                  •  '"^^^•k'>:iv V*1   «  f^ ,X>  i  "









''tla.1                    /
r"«*        ^
 •   -     .     "'^-r-'^  X
                     "   HI


Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        6-6

-------
              Figure 6-4 Tampa, Florida Site 1 (GAFL) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        6-7

-------
              Figure 6-5 Tampa, Florida Site 2 (LEFL) Monitoring Station
                                           :-
                               HOT;
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        6-8

-------
               Figure 6-6 Tampa, Florida Site 3 (SIFL) Monitoring Station
                               .X
                            v
                                                              -           '•
                                                              •i-..1. ftiJii- Ijfi^fer1:^

Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                         6-9

-------
     Figure 6-7.  Facilities  Located Within  10 Miles of AZFL,  DNFL, ELFL, GAFL, LEFL, and SIFL
Facilities Located Within 10
Miles of AZFL, DNFL, ELFL,
GAFL, LEFL, and SIFL
  A  AZFL Site
  •  DNFL Site
  •  ELFL Site
  +  GAFL Site
  +  LEFL Site
  *  SIFL Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
#Eng., Accntng., Res., Mngmnt., and Rel. Srvcs. (4)
% National Security and International Affairs (4)
& Pipelines, Except Natural Gas(1)
@ Unknown Industrial Classification (44)
A Building Construction Gen.Cntrctrs. £ Operative Bldrs. (4)
B Food and Kindred Products (2)
C Lumber and Wood Products, E»;ept Furniture (3)
D Paper and Allied P roducts (2)
E Printing, Publishing, and Allied Industries (33)
F Chemicals and Allied Products (48)
G Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (12)
H Rubber and Miscellaneous P lastics Products (51 )
I Leather and Leather P roducts (2)
J Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products (6)
K Primary Metal Industries (4)
L Fab. Metal Prods., Eiocpt. Machinery & Trans. Equip. (55)
M Industrial and Commercial Machinery's Com p. Equip. (6)
N ElecS Othr Elect Equip & Comps, Excpt Comp Equip (15)
O Transportation Equipment (76)
P Meas, Anlyz, Cntr Instr; Photo, Med a Opt Gds;  Clks (18)
Q Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (22)
R Motor Freight Transportation Warehousing (4)
S Transportation By Air (3)
T E lectri c, Gas, and Sanitary Servi ces (1 1 0)
U Wholesale  Trade-durable Goods (6)
VWholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (66)
W Automotive Repair, Services, and Parking (2)
X Miscellaneous Repair Services (4)
Y Health Services (9)
Z Educational Services (2)
Note: Dueto facility density and colocati on, the total
fecilities displayed may not equal the number of facilities
in parentheses above.

-------
Table 6-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Florida
Site
Name

AZFL


DNFL


ELFL


r; APT



LEFL



SIFL


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day

All
9001

sample
day

All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



5.58
(±0.70)


18.34
(±7.32)


3.84
(±0.42)

	
6.91
(±1.51)



5.84
(±1.33)



8.17
(±4.07)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

80.53
(±0.94)
79.48
(±2.34)
80.53
(±0.94)
79.65
(±2.37)
80.53
(±0.94)
79.65
(±2.37)
SI A^
(±0.95)
80.88
(±2.21)

81.43
f-\-f) O^'v

81.29
(±2.20)

81.43
(±0.95)
81.07
(±2.17)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

64.72
(±1.37)
62.25
(±3.48)
64.72
(±1.37)
63.13
(±3.34)
64.72
(±1.37)
63.13
(±3.34)
AS OQ
(±1.12)
68.68
(±2.59)

68.29
("-Li lr)\
(±1.12.)
68.63
(±2.62)

68.29
(±1.12)
68.65
(±2.54)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

55.52
(±1.36)
52.71
(±3.68)
55.52
(±1.36)
53.22
(±3.69)
55.52
(±1.36)
53.22
(±3.69)
^Q f,1
(±1.11)
60.07
(±2.66)

59.67
(-\- 1 11s!
(±L.LL)
60.13
(±2.67)

59.67
(±1.11)
60.24 (±2.59)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

58.78
(±1.37)
55.73
(±3.76)
58.78
(±1.37)
56.41
(±3.71)
58.78
(±1.37)
56.41
(±3.71)
AO cn
(±1.02)
63.32
(±2.41)

62.93
("-Li l)r>\
(±1.UZ;
63.31
(±2.44)

62.93
(±1.02)
63.39
(±2.36)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

63.84
(±1.49)
61.52
(±3.88)
63.84
(±1.49)
61.77
(±3.92)
63.84
(±1.49)
61.77
(±3.92)
^Q ««
(±0.96)
71.04
(±2.02)

69.88
/_i_n Qf.\

70.88
(±1.90)

69.88
(±0.96)
71.29
(±1.95)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-1.77
(±0.51)
-1.70
(±1.14)
-1.77
(±0.51)
-1.71
(±1.16)
-1.77
(±0.51)
-1.71
(±1.16)
n n^
(±0.41)
-0.04
(±0.95)

-0.05
t+(\ A^\

0.12
(±0.96)

-0.05
(±0.41)
0.06
(±0.93)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-1.00
(±0.55)
-0.98
(±1.40)
-1.00
(±0.55)
-0.70
(±1.30)
-1.00
(±0.55)
-0.70
(±1.30)
n si
(±0.38)
-0.65
(±0.94)

-0.81
f-lf\ *IQ\

-0.54
(±0.91)

-0.81
(±0.38)
-0.61
(±0.89)

-------
       Table 6-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Azalea Park in St.
                                                  Petersburg, Florida (AZFL)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Formaldehyde
Maximum
Temperature
-0.10
-0.62
0.25
Average
Temperature
-0.05
-0.18
-0.05
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.05
-0.21
-0.06
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.00
-0.11
-0.08
Relative
Humidity
-0.10
-0.01
-0.24
u-component of
wind speed
-0.23
-0.03
-0.06
v-component of
wind speed
-0.37
-0.57
0.13
to

-------
Table 6-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Dunedin in
                                       St. Petersburg, Florida (DNFL)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Formaldehyde
Maximum
Temperature
0.12
-0.27
0.33
Average
Temperature
0.08
-0.13
0.17
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.04
-0.12
0.01
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.03
-0.05
-0.01
Relative
Humidity
-0.12
-0.03
-0.18
u-component of
wind speed
-0.07
-0.08
0.17
v-component of
wind speed
-0.02
-0.21
0.32

-------
Table 6-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at East Lake in St.
                                          Petersburg, Florida (ELFL)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Formaldehyde
Maximum
Temperature
-0.31
-0.75
0.19
Average
Temperature
-0.08
-0.19
0.10
Dew Point
Temperature
0.01
-0.22
0.17
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.05
-0.11
0.15
Relative
Humidity
0.17
0.10
0.06
u-component of
wind speed
-0.40
-0.08
-0.29
v-component of
wind speed
-0.43
-0.56
-0.07

-------
Table 6-2d - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Gandy in
                                        Tampa, Florida (GAFL)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Formaldehyde
Maximum
Temperature
-0.08
-0.58
0.32
Average
Temperature
-0.14
-0.54
0.13
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.17
-0.65
0.10
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.16
-0.61
0.12
Relative
Humidity
-0.12
-0.24
-0.16
u-component of
wind speed
-0.35
-0.15
-0.22
v-component of
wind speed
-0.27
-0.32
0.05

-------
           Table 6-2e - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Lewis in
                                                    Tampa, Florida (LEFL)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Formaldehyde
Maximum
Temperature
0.17
-0.55
0.59
Average
Temperature
0.11
-0.40
0.50
Dew Point
Temperature
0.01
-0.60
0.44
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.06
-0.51
0.47
Relative
Humidity
-0.28
-0.41
-0.14
u-component of
wind speed
0.01
0.16
0.14
v-component of
wind speed
0.02
-0.45
0.14
Oi

Oi

-------
Table 6-2f - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Simmons in Tampa,
                                                 Florida (SIFL)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Formaldehyde
Maximum
Temperature
-0.13
-0.26
0.25
Average
Temperature
-0.19
-0.15
0.24
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.27
-0.27
0.20
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.24
-0.21
0.22
Relative
Humidity
-0.28
-0.17
-0.07
u-component of
wind speed
-0.30
0.08
0.05
v-component of
wind speed
-0.40
-0.28
-0.10

-------
Table 6-3. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Florida
                           Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
AZFL
DNFL
ELFL
GAFL
LEFL
SIFL
Population
within Ten
Miles
596,939
452,739
495,457
458,547
589,756
672,150
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
441,735
335,027
366,638
339,325
436,419
497,391
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
51,000
16,281
14,000
81,460
1,055
18,700
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
5.58(±0.70)ppbv
18.34 (±7.32) ppbv
3.84(±0.42)ppbv
6.91 (±1.51) ppbv
5. 84 (±1.33) ppbv
8. 17 (±4.07) ppbv
                                 6-18

-------
7.0    Sites in Iowa
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the six
UATMP sites in Iowa (C2IA, CLIA, CRIA, DAIA, DMIA, and MUIA).  Five of these sites
reside in eastern Iowa (C2IA, CLIA, CRIA, DAIA, and MUIA), while one is located in central
Iowa (DMIA). Several Iowa cities are involved in the 2001 UATMP report including Cedar
Rapids (C2IA and CRIA), Clinton (CLIA), Davenport (DAIA), Des Moines (DMIA), and
Muscatine (MUIA). Figures 7-1 through 7-6 are topographical maps showing the monitoring
stations in their urban locations.  Figures 7-7 through 7-11 are  maps identifying facilities within
ten miles of the sites and that reported to the 1999 NEI.  The C2IA and CRIA sites are within a
few miles of each other, oriented north to south.  The bulk of the industrial facilities are located
between the two sites and are mostly food product industries. CLIA has  a few facilities mainly to
the southwest and west of its locations; DAIA has the largest number of industrial facilities
nearby, generally located to the east and southeast; DMIA has a number of facilities to its
northeast and east, and just three to its west and west-southwest; and MUIA's nearby facilities, of
which most are chemical producing sites, are oriented mainly to the north and south of the
monitoring site.

       Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at four  weather stations near
these sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements. The four weather stations are Cedar Rapids Municipal Airport,
Clinton Municipal Airport, Des Moines International, and Muscatine (WBAN 14990, 94982,
14933, and 14937, respectively).

       Table 7-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of these sites, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days.  Typically, Iowa experiences
cold, rather dry winters and warm, moist summers, thanks to its continental climate. The seasons
show marked contrast, producing variable weather. Table 7-1  shows that the majority of the
weather parameters vary little among the stations, with the exception of the wind components.

                                           7-1

-------
However, even the average annual wind components show only a directional variation between
southwest and west among Iowa's participating monitoring stations. This information can be
found at the following web site: http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/desmoin.htm.

7.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Iowa Sites
       Carbonyl compounds and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at all of the
sites, as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4. Halogenated hydrocarbon compounds' geometric
means varied the least among the sites, with CLIA reporting 3.08 ppbv and DMIA reporting 3.60
ppbv. Carbonyl compounds geometric means came in a close second, with C2IA measuring 2.96
ppbv and MUIA measuring 3.93 ppbv. Hydrocarbons and  polar compounds geometric means
had more variation. The highest geometric mean for hydrocarbons was 4.68 ppbv at DMIA and
the lowest was 2.42 at MUIA. The polar compounds' highest geometric mean was 3.44 ppbv at
CLIA and the lowest was 1.24 at CRIA. CLIA reported the highest daily average UATMP
concentration of the six sites (59.20 ±62.27 ppbv), which was at least twice the averages of the
other sites. The other five sites ranged from the mid-teen to the upper 20s, as indicated in
Table 7-1. Table 7-1 also lists the averages for selected meteorological parameters from January
2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time period covered in this report. These sites
also opted to have total and speciated nonmethane organic  compounds (SNMOC) sampled
during air toxic sampling. SNMOC/NMOC compounds are of particular interest because of their
role in ozone formation. Readers are encouraged to review EPA's 2001 Nonmethane Organic
Compounds (NMOC) and Speciated Nonmethane  Organic  Compounds  (SNMOC) Monitoring
Program, Final Report (EPA, 2002) for more information on SNMOC/NMOC trends and
concentrations.

       The average total NMOC  value for C2IA was 137 (±7.76) ppbC, of which nearly 51%
could be identified through speciation; the average total NMOC for CLIA was 142 (±25.03)
ppbC, of which nearly 59% could be identified; the average total NMOC for CRIA was 168
(±36.68) ppbC, of which nearly 71% could be identified; the average total NMOC for DAIA was
176 (±18.08) ppbC, of which nearly 54% could be identified; the average total NMOC for
DMIA was 196 (±23.23) ppbC, of which nearly 53% could be identified; and the average total

                                         7-2

-------
NMOC for MUIA was 197 (±61.38) ppbC, of which nearly 72% could be identified. Of the
speciated compounds, ethane, isopentane, and propane measured the highest concentrations at
the Iowa sites. These values, as well as typical sources of these compounds, are included in
Table 7-3. Ozone concentrations were also sampled at CLIA on 123 sample days, and were
retrieved from the U.S. EPA's AIRS database. The average ozone concentration for each sample
day was 57.36 ppbv.  Unfortunately, ozone concentrations were not sampled at the other sites.
This information is also available in Table 7-3.

       Tables 7-2a-f are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of
the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological  parameters by site. Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. Several strong correlations were
calculated at most of the sites; only DMIA failed to have any correlations fall into the "strong"
category (0.50 to 0.75 or -0.50 to -0.75). C2IA indicated strong positive correlations between
several weather parameters (maximum and average temperature, and dew point and wet bulb
temperature) and four compounds (chloromethane, formaldehyde, methyl ethyl ketone, and
propylene). A similar moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and -0.50) to strong
positive correlation was found with C2IA's sister site, CRIA, among these same variables, but
only with formaldehyde, similar to the DAIA site.  CLIA indicated the same moderately strong to
strong positive correlation with these weather parameters and two compounds,  formaldehyde and
chloromethane.

       MUIA was the only site that indicated a moderately strong to strong negative correlation
of the four previously mentioned weather parameters to any of the compounds. These
compounds include acetone, acetylene, benzene, and propylene.  However, DAIA showed a
moderately strong negative correlation between acetylene, chloromethane, and  dichlorodifluoro-
methane and the four temperature parameters, and DMIA demonstrated this correlation with
acetylene and the temperature parameters. Maximum  and average temperature and dew point
and wet bulb temperature seem to have a strong correlation to several of the compounds, some
positive, some negative.
                                          7-3

-------
       With regard to the wind components, some interesting correlations were noted at several
of the sites. Two sites, DMIA and MUIA, had a majority of the compounds return moderately
strong negative correlations to the v-component of the wind.  At the DAIA site, half of the
fourteen compounds returned moderately strong to strong negative correlations to the u-
component of the wind, while the other half had only weak (in this case, between 0.15 and -0.04)
correlations.  Lastly, the C2IA site reported all but one compound (methylene chloride)  had a
weak (between 0 and 0.25 or 0 and -0.25) negative correlation with the u-component of the wind,
while all but one compound (again, methylene chloride) had a weak positive correlation with the
v-component of the wind.

7.2    Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established.  The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 automobiles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information
on this ratio).  The  population near the  DMIA site is the highest with 379,063 people operating
approximately 280,507 vehicles.  The lowest population of the Iowa sites is near CLIA, with
42,478 people driving 31,433 automobiles. This information is compared to the average daily
concentration of the prevalent compounds at each Iowa site in Table 7-4. Also included in Table
4-6 is average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars passing the
monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site  on a daily basis.

       A roadside  study conducted to measure emissions from  motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban  area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites.  The six Iowa sites all concentration ratios that resembled those of
the roadside study,  although the actual  values varied. CLIA had a toluene-ethylbenzene ratio that
nearly doubled that of the roadside study.  In fact,  all of the toluene-ethylbenzene ratios at the
Iowa monitoring sites were larger than  that of the roadside study.  This trend also held with the
concentration ratios of benzene-ethylbenzene.  Conversely, both w-,/?-xylene-ethylbenzene and

                                           7-4

-------
o-xylene-ethylbenzene concentration ratios were slightly less at the monitoring locations than the
roadside study ratios.
                                            7-5

-------
           Figure 7-1. Cedar Rapids, Iowa Site 1 (C2IA) Monitoring Station
                                        -

                    k   -       •"'
                  r  .x--v>'^    '-,   *  .vk- ^
                      *'  •        ^  !- -^

                                  :>-'
                      iSl^v  •)
                       ~-
             5l:,^K£i3& v'"  ?sr\^
              fe-4t^P-,   }M\C'
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                     7-6

-------
                 Figure 7-2.  Clinton, Iowa (CLIA) Monitoring Station
                               -^•wi* ,

                       T^   -
                                                          r  /  /  '   <•.''
                                              v'.i : . ."
         w
                                                               ttt/rr' '"•'  '    i w^^H
                                                               1'',' -         ' \
                                                            l»  ;• •:--,        ,  '  ",>
                                                                    ,-
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                         7-7

-------
          Figure 7-3. Cedar Rapids, Iowa Site 2 (CRIA) Monitoring Station
                                 tJSZIfi-Ai
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                  7-8

-------
               Figure 7-4. Davenport, Iowa (DAIA) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        7-9

-------
               Figure 7-5. Des Moines, Iowa (DMIA) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        7-10

-------
               Figure 7-6. Muscatine, Iowa (MUIA) Monitoring Station
                                                   •\       ^
                                                         H- -t	F~J	J *•	  —IK J	






                                                         Si       •'/
                                          «    -
                                      C7   h"  -} N
                                            e —&  *
               :>
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                      7-11

-------
                         Figure 7-7. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of C2IA and CRIA
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of C2IA
and CRIA
A C2IASite
• CRIA Site

Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Food and Kindred Products (1 6)
B Chemicals and AJIied Products (2)
C Rubber and Miscellaneous P lastics Products (4)
D Primary Metal Industries (2)
E Fabricated Metal Prod., E xopt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (4)
F Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (4)
G Electronic & Other E lee. Equip. & Comps., EMCpt. Com p. Equip. (3)
H E I ectri c, Gas , and Sanitary S ervi ces (7)
I Unknown Industrial Classification (1 2)










Not D t fa Tt d sit d I cat' th tot I fa It'
ci splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above

Iowa
/
















/
/
/
/
/
/

y
X
/ ^
\
V
\
V



^^
s^

/
/




j*^
j^
/s
/
/







^•-
^\^


^^-







	 	 ^
^__--— ~





A
Hh
AA
F F
E E
C G
C G



—- -—___

-— -.
^"-»,





	 A_A.
F.G
~~ — — — ___^^
"^--^^



E
E
A A
A HA
H

'IH
'l'
^^
F

__— — -~~|-i -l
1 1



^^

N.
H \
\
\
\
\

•^
^v
A C\
A C X
\
\




/
^/
/
234 Mile
1 1 1














\
\
\







/
I


to

-------
                                 Figure 7-8.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CLIA
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CLIA
  •  CLIA Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Food and Kindred Products (2)
B Paper and Allied Products (1)
C Chemicals and Allied Products (4)
D P rim ary M etal I ndustri es (1)
E Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (2)
F Unknown Industrial Classification^)
G Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products (1)
H Fabricated Metal Prod., Excpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (2)
I Transportation Services(1)

-------
                                       Figure 7-9.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DAIA
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DAIA
   •   DAIA Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
! Amusement and Recrealion Services(1)
# E ducational Services (15)
% Membership Organizations (4)
&. Nondassifiatale Establishments (10)
* Mining and Quarrying of NonmetallicMinerals, Except Fuels(1)
@ Health Services (5)
A Food and Kindred Products (4)
B Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products(8)
C P rim ary M etal I ndustries (S)
D Fabricated Metal Prods., Excpt. Machinery & Trans. Equip. (17)
E Ind. & Comm. Machinery & Comp. Equip. (15)
F Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (2)
G Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (3)
H Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (7)
I Business Services (2)
J Unknowi Industrial Classitcation (7)
K Agricultural Services (3)
L Lumber and Wood Products, Except Furniture (2)
M Paper and Allied Products (1)
N Chemicals and Allied Products (2)
O Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (3)
P Rubber and M i seel laneous P lastics P roducts (3)
Q Elec.& Other Elect. Equip. & Comps., E>ccpt. Comp. Equip. (1)
R Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing (1)
S Wholesale Trade-durable Goods (1)
T General Merchandise Stores (1)
U Eating and Drinking Places(1)
V Miscellaneous Retail (2)
W Depository Institutions (4)
X Real E state (2)
Y Hotels, Room ing Houses.Cam ps, and Other Lodgi ng P laces (1)
Z Personal Services(3)
AJustice, Public Order, and Safety (2)
•Jote: Dueto facility density and colocation.the total facilities
:isplayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above
                                                                                                                 D    1    2    3    A  Miles
                                                                                                                      I     I     I    I

-------
Figure 7-10. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DMIA
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of DMIA
• DMIA Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Food and Kindred Products (4)
B Furniture and Figures (1 )
C Printing, Publishing, and A lied lndustries(1)
D C hem ical s and All ied P roducts (2)
E Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (2)
F Primary Metal Industries (13
G Fabricated Metal Prod., EMCpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (3)
H Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (2)
I Business Services (1)
J Unknown Industrial C I assii cation (1)










Note: Dueto facility density and coloration the total facilities
d splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above.

2 t^
^ • f>
Iowa





















j>*
/f
/
y
/
/
/
	 /
/
/






\
X



___ — — •
^^
S*
















F C
\^_




_ 	 — ______^
~-










E

B
D
D
A



0 ~~T~~~2
i i





^\
\,
\
x
\


J

A
H
I
A


G
E
A

3 4 Miles
i i















\
\
\
1





\


-------
                                 Figure 7-11.  Facilities Located  Within 10 Miles of MUIA
 Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of MUIA
  •  MUIA Site
 Source Category (Number of Facilities)
 A Food and Kindred Products (2)
 B Furniture and Figures (5)
 C C hem ical s and All led P roducts flS)
 D Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (4)
 E Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (6)
 F Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (2)
 G Unknowi Industrial CI assrfi cation (10)
Note: Dueto facility density and colocation, the total facilities
displayed may not equal the num ber of facilities in parantheses above

-------
Table 7-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Iowa
Site
Name

C2IA


CLIA


CRIA


r> AT A



DMIA



MUIA


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day

All
9001

sample
day

All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



15.16
(±2.18)


59.20
(±62.27)


17.94
(±6.97)

	
16.59
(±4.08)



28.09
(±8.61)



23.52
(±15.00)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

60.43
(±2.22)
60.35
(±3.83)
61.52
(±2.16)
59.85
(±8.47)
60.43
(±2.22)
60.78
(±5.17)
A1 ^0
(±2.16)
60.23
(±7.37)

62.51
1-V-"! 7A\
(±2. 24;
63.50
(±7.33)

62.21
(±2.21)
64.79
(±8.48)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

43.98
(±2.04)
44.24
(±3.51)
44.19
(±2.08)
45.24
(±8.33)
43.98
(±2.04)
45.29
(±5.01)
AA 1 Q
(±2.08)
44.63
(±7.28)

47.01
I'-l-T Tfl'l
(±z.zu;
47.75
(±7.36)

43.23
(±1.98)
47.00
(±7.75)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

36.51
(±1.83)
36.57
(±3.14)
36.26
(±1.83)
36.98
(±7.09)
36.51
(±1.83)
37.22
(±4.45)
1& OA
(±1.83)
36.12
(±6.21)

38.18
/-Li O'J'l
(±i.yj;
38.69
(±6.39)

35.78
(±1.75)
39.11
(±6.92)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

40.05
(±1.83)
40.08
(±3.10)
40.16
(±1.86)
40.90
(±7.31)
40.05
(±1.83)
40.61
(±4.36)
AH i^
(±1.86)
40.27
(±6.37)

42.41
/-LI o/n
(±1.71)
42.97
(±6.47)

39.42
(±1.77)
42.76
(±6.92)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

64.48
(±1.24)
64.63
(±2.08)
61.75
(±1.30)
63.68
(±4.46)
64.48
(±1.24)
64.53
(±2.96)
^1 "7^
(±1.30)
62.59
(±4.10)

62.30
l'-^-^ ^^\
(±1.13)
61.29
(±4.10)

61.58
(±1.29)
63.25
(±4.38)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

1.07
(±0.58)
0.68
(±1.00)
1.60
(±0.61)
1.90
(±2.10)
1.07
(±0.58)
0.68
(±1.30)
1 AH
(±0.61)
2.42
(±1.65)

0.73
('J-fl 5TNl
(±u.:u;
0.84
(±1.86)

1.01
(±0.41)
1.28
(±1.30)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

0.51
(±0.55)
1.05
(±0.99)
1.10
(±0.56)
2.53
(±2.18)
0.51
(±0.55)
1.65
(±1.41)
i in
(±0.56)
3.15
(±2.01)

1.04 (±0.60)

3.35
(±2.25)

-0.08
(±0.48)
2.08
(±1.71)

-------
               Table 7-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                               Cedar Rapids, Iowa Site 2 (C2IA)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.23
0.11
-0.36
0.02
0.59
0.17
0.30
0.52
0.36
0.50
0.08
0.32
0.68
0.28
Average
Temperature
0.33
0.21
-0.33
0.00
0.50
0.13
0.27
0.61
0.32
0.53
0.00
0.30
0.68
0.25
Dew Point
Temperature
0.31
0.18
-0.34
0.01
0.53
0.13
0.30
0.62
0.36
0.56
0.01
0.32
0.74
0.25
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.32
0.21
-0.32
0.01
0.52
0.14
0.29
0.62
0.35
0.56
0.00
0.32
0.72
0.26
Relative
Humidity
0.16
0.22
0.17
0.05
-0.07
-0.06
0.15
0.18
0.13
0.17
-0.11
0.13
0.21
0.00
u-component of
wind speed
-0.07
-0.08
-0.16
-0.11
-0.15
-0.04
-0.15
-0.21
-0.22
-0.12
0.07
-0.19
-0.16
-0.12
v-component of
wind speed
0.26
0.07
0.14
0.07
0.15
0.05
0.14
0.27
0.18
0.18
-0.07
0.21
0.15
0.05
oo

-------
               Table 7-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                     Clinton, Iowa (CLIA)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.29
-0.10
-0.48
0.02
0.61
0.19
0.03
0.64
0.27
0.13
0.21
0.16
0.12
0.05
Average
Temperature
0.31
-0.06
-0.38
-0.04
0.49
0.24
-0.03
0.58
0.21
0.06
0.23
0.09
0.10
-0.04
Dew Point
Temperature
0.29
-0.08
-0.37
0.05
0.45
0.26
0.04
0.57
0.27
0.10
0.25
0.16
0.11
0.03
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.29
-0.08
-0.37
0.00
0.48
0.26
-0.01
0.57
0.24
0.07
0.23
0.12
0.11
-0.01
Relative
Humidity
-0.14
0.01
0.40
0.30
-0.14
0.36
-0.06
-0.24
0.10
-0.13
0.05
0.04
0.24
-0.10
u-component of
wind speed
0.16
0.14
0.07
-0.02
0.26
0.08
-0.22
0.10
-0.17
-0.04
-0.06
-0.18
0.12
-0.24
v-component of
wind speed
0.38
0.08
0.07
0.02
0.29
-0.11
-0.02
0.32
0.11
0.06
-0.04
0.10
0.11
-0.20
VO

-------
               Table 7-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at

                                               Cedar Rapids, Iowa Site 1 (CRIA)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.10
-0.06
0.06
0.17
0.36
-0.23
0.20
0.43
0.21
-0.01
-0.01
0.20
0.31
0.19
Average
Temperature
0.11
-0.01
0.06
0.16
0.34
-0.22
0.20
0.51
0.22
0.03
-0.08
0.21
0.30
0.21
Dew Point
Temperature
0.07
-0.03
0.00
0.10
0.34
-0.21
0.15
0.42
0.18
0.02
-0.04
0.16
0.28
0.14
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.13
0.02
0.06
0.16
0.34
-0.22
0.18
0.46
0.21
0.02
-0.06
0.19
0.33
0.19
Relative
Humidity
0.11
0.18
-0.08
-0.06
0.00
-0.06
-0.13
-0.11
-0.13
0.08
-0.07
-0.12
0.03
-0.14
u-component of
wind speed
0.18
-0.06
-0.06
-0.13
-0.17
0.31
-0.22
-0.16
-0.23
-0.09
-0.12
-0.20
-0.20
-0.13
v-component of
wind speed
0.24
0.08
-0.09
-0.05
0.17
-0.30
-0.11
0.30
-0.09
0.20
0.01
-0.10
-0.08
-0.10
to
o

-------
               Table 7-2d - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                   Davenport, Iowa (DAIA)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.17
-0.03
-0.44
-0.06
-0.33
-0.39
0.18
0.54
0.24
0.03
0.33
0.15
-0.23
0.33
Average
Temperature
0.19
0.08
-0.49
-0.23
-0.27
-0.37
-0.03
0.59
0.05
0.02
0.31
-0.06
-0.25
0.27
Dew Point
Temperature
0.18
0.06
-0.45
-0.13
-0.27
-0.35
0.07
0.56
0.13
-0.04
0.32
0.04
-0.22
0.27
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.18
0.07
-0.48
-0.19
-0.27
-0.37
0.01
0.57
0.08
-0.01
0.31
-0.02
-0.24
0.27
Relative
Humidity
-0.18
0.14
0.05
-0.04
0.07
-0.12
-0.11
-0.13
-0.07
-0.19
0.02
-0.11
0.07
-0.10
u-component of
wind speed
0.04
0.08
-0.39
-0.54
-0.25
0.15
-0.39
0.04
-0.41
0.06
-0.04
-0.47
-0.34
0.02
v-component of
wind speed
0.20
0.07
-0.21
-0.20
0.23
-0.26
-0.19
0.25
-0.15
0.02
0.03
-0.21
0.15
0.17
to

-------
                Table 7-2e- Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at

                                                   Des Moines, Iowa (DMIA)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.14
0.10
-0.37
-0.07
0.02
0.23
0.18
0.14
0.15
0.08
-0.25
0.12
0.03
0.29
Average
Temperature
0.15
0.14
-0.39
-0.22
0.13
0.31
0.03
0.11
0.01
0.17
-0.18
-0.02
-0.02
0.17
Dew Point
Temperature
0.19
0.15
-0.38
-0.11
0.13
0.23
0.16
0.17
0.14
0.04
-0.17
0.11
0.06
0.27
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.17
0.15
-0.38
-0.17
0.11
0.29
0.09
0.14
0.06
0.12
-0.17
0.03
0.02
0.22
Relative
Humidity
0.12
0.12
0.27
0.13
0.11
0.26
0.13
0.10
0.15
-0.08
0.22
0.12
0.26
0.13
u-component of
wind speed
-0.14
-0.08
-0.23
-0.23
0.16
-0.11
-0.31
-0.09
-0.27
0.17
0.19
-0.28
0.02
-0.16
v-component of
wind speed
-0.28
-0.24
-0.17
-0.35
-0.17
0.29
-0.29
-0.32
-0.35
0.13
-0.47
-0.39
-0.38
-0.14
to
to

-------
                Table 7-2f - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                 Muscatine, Iowa Site 1 (MUIA)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.01
-0.54
-0.68
-0.65
-0.01
-0.03
-0.20
0.41
-0.17
-0.40
0.24
-0.26
-0.66
-0.13
Average
Temperature
0.06
-0.47
-0.63
-0.63
-0.02
0.03
-0.33
0.19
-0.27
-0.40
0.13
-0.35
-0.61
-0.31
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.08
-0.52
-0.60
-0.61
0.04
-0.09
-0.26
0.23
-0.21
-0.41
0.20
-0.29
-0.61
-0.24
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.01
-0.49
-0.62
-0.63
0.00
-0.01
-0.31
0.20
-0.25
-0.41
0.16
-0.34
-0.61
-0.29
Relative
Humidity
-0.24
0.12
0.25
0.17
0.00
-0.14
-0.06
-0.43
-0.02
-0.07
-0.09
0.01
0.15
-0.16
u-component of
wind speed
0.06
0.12
0.11
0.15
-0.02
-0.01
0.03
-0.14
0.04
0.00
-0.30
0.03
0.10
0.00
v-component of
wind speed
0.46
-0.36
-0.36
-0.35
0.08
0.36
-0.35
-0.03
-0.30
-0.03
0.07
-0.32
-0.23
-0.28

-------
Table 7-3. TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Iowa Monitoring Stations
Monitoring
Location
C2IA
CLIA
CRIA
DAIA
DMIA
MUIA
Average Ozone
Concentrations
from May-Aug
N/A
57.36 ppbv
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Number
of Ozone
Sampling Days
N/A
123
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Average
TNMOC
(speciated)
70 (±4.45)
ppbC
83 (±8.09)
ppbC
120
(±31.79)
ppbC
95
(±11.42)
ppbC
103
(±18.78)
ppbC
83
(±12.82)
ppbC
Average
TNMOC
(w/
unknowns)
137 (±7.76)
ppbC
142
(±25.03)
ppbC
168
(±36.68)
ppbC
176
(±18.08)
ppbC
196
(±23.23)
ppbC
197
(±61.38)
ppbC
%
TNMOC
Identified
51%
59%
71 %
54%
53%
42%
SNMOC
Compound
with the
Highest
Concentration
Ethane (6.87
ppbC)
Isopentane
(7.18ppbC)
Isopentane
(14.40 ppbC)
Ethane (8.25
ppbC)
Isopentane
(17.73 ppbC)
Propane (8.96
ppbC)
Typical
Emission
Sources
Production of
insulating
materials;
cooking oils such
as shortening
Non-wood
upholstered office
side and arm
chairs
See above entry
for Isopentane
See above entry
for Ethane
See above entry
for Isopentane
Vehicle fuel;
residential and
industrial fuel,
refrigerant

-------
Table 7-4. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Iowa Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
C2IA
CLIA
CRIA
DAIA
DMIA
MUIA
Population
within Ten
Miles
174,385
42,478
175,333
274,768
379,063
33,956
Estimated
Number of
MotorVehicles
Owned
129,045
31,433
129,746
203,328
280,507
25,127
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
1,500
500
15,600
1,000
12,400
2,800
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
15.16 (±2.18) ppbv
59.20 (±62.27) ppbv
17.94 (±6.97) ppbv
16.59 (±4.08) ppbv
28. 09 (±8. 61) ppbv
23. 52 (±15.00) ppbv
                                       7-25

-------
8.0    Sites in Michigan
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
seven UATMP sites in Michigan (AMPI, DEMI, E7MI, LOMI, RRMI, SWMI, and YFMI).  All
seven of these sites reside in the Detroit metropolitan statistical area. Figures 8-1 through 8-7 are
topographical maps showing the monitoring stations in their urban locations. Figures 8-8 and
8-9 are maps identifying facilities within ten miles of the sites that reported to the 1999 NEI. The
E7MI and LOMI sites are further to the north of the city than the other five monitoring locations,
and the majority of the industrial sites are fabricated metal producers, transportation equipment
manufacturers, and chemical companies.  The bulk of the industrial facilities is to the south of
E7MI and LOMI.  The DEMI, RRMI, SWMI, and YFMI sites are close to each other, and are
surrounded by numerous industries, most of which are fabricated metal producers, transportation
equipment manufacturers, utility companies, and chemical producers.  APMI is just to the
southwest of the cluster of other sites.

       Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at three weather stations near
the sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements.  The three weather stations are Pontiac, Detroit-Metropolitan, and
Detroit City Airport (WBAN 94817, 94847, and 14822, respectively).

       Table 8-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of the sites, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information  (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days.  The Detroit area is located in
the Great Lakes region, a place for active weather, as several storm tracks run right across the
region. Hence, winters can be cold and wet, while summers are generally mild. The urbanization
of the area along with Lake St. Clair to the east are two major influences on the city's weather.
The lake tends to keep Detroit warmer in the winter and cooler in the summer than more inland
areas. The urban heat island tends to keep the city warmer than outlying areas. Winds are often
breezy and generally flow from the  southwest and west on average, as can be confirmed by Table
8-1. This  information can be found at the following web sites:

                                          8-1

-------
http://www. ssec. org/idi s/gates/States/physical/detroit. htm and
http://tneetings.sixcontinentshotels.com/destinations/detroit/weather.httnl.

8.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Michigan Sites
       Carbonyl compounds and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at all of the
sites with the exception of SWMI, which only measured carbonyls, and E7MI, which only
measured SVOC.  Tables 3-3 and 3-4 provide information on sites that measured carbonyls and
VOC only. RRMI and SWMI had the two highest carbonyl geometric means, 27.44 ppbv and
26.35 ppbv, respectively, while the remaining four sites had geometric means less than one-fifth
of these two. A similar situation occurred with halogenated hydrocarbons, with APMI far
surpassing the other sites with a geometric mean of 19.28 ppbv. The other sites measured
between 3.14 ppbv (RRMI) and 5.18 ppbv (LOMI). The hydrocarbon geometric means were
closer together, with the lowest geometric mean reported by APMI (4.06 ppbv) and the highest
reported by YFMI (10.87 ppbv).  The polar compounds had the smallest variation, ranging from
1.43 ppbv (YFMI) and 3.84 ppbv (APMI). The average total UATMP daily concentration at
APMI was by far the highest reported by any of the stations,  145.23 (±161.92) ppbv, while the
remaining sites ranged between  12.84 ±2.41ppbv (RRMI) and 32.14 ±9.21 ppbv (LOMI). Table
8-1 also lists the averages for selected meteorological parameters from January 2001 to
December 2001, which is similar to the time period covered in this report.

       SVOC concentrations were sampled at all seven of the sites. Average SVOC
concentrations ranged from 5.64 (±0.15) //g at APMI to 28.35 (±8.68) //g at YFMI.  Ozone
concentrations were also sampled at APMI and E7MI on 123 sample days, and were retrieved
from the U.S. EPA's AIRS database.  The average ozone concentration for each sample day was
54.63 ppbv and 60.74 ppbv, respectively. Unfortunately, ozone concentrations were not sampled
at the other sites.  Information on SVOC and ozone concentrations is given in Table 8-3.

       Tables 8-2a-f are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of
the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site.  Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. At APMI, strong (between 0.50

                                         8-2

-------
and 0.75 or -0.50 and -0.75) to moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and -0.50)
positive correlations were noted between acetaldehyde, formaldehyde (where all correlations
were strong), and methylene chloride and maximum temperature, average temperature, dew
point, and wet bulb temperature. A similar correlation was seen at LOMI with the same weather
parameters and formaldehyde. A strong positive correlation between methylene chloride and
relative humidity was noted at the APMI site as well. At the YFMI site, the BETX compounds
(benzene,  ethylbenzene, w-,/»-xylene, o-xylene, and toluene) had a strong positive correlation
with the v-component of the wind. Strong to moderately strong positive correlations between
chloromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, and methyl ethyl ketone with several of the
temperature and moisture variables were seen at RRMI. At the majority of the sites in Michigan,
most of the correlations, regardless of the strength of the correlation, were positive, with the
exception  of the u-component of the wind, which was generally weakly negative.

8.2    Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 motor vehicles to every one person (refer to  section 3.4.1 for more information
on this ratio). The Michigan site with the highest population is the DEMI site, where 1,241,008
people  are operating approximately 918,346 vehicles. The RRMI has the lowest population of
the seven Michigan sites, with 905,107 people driving 669,779 automobiles. This information is
compared  to the average daily concentration of the prevalent compounds  at each Michigan site in
Table 8-4. Also included in Table 8-4 are average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the
average number of cars passing the monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a
daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area.  (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study  and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites. Two of the Michigan sites are  not located on this table, SWMI

                                          8-3

-------
and E7MI. (Refer to section 8.1 for an explanation).  Four of the sites' concentration ratios,
APMI, DEMI, LOMI, and RRMI, look very similar to those of the roadside study, with the
exception that the m-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio is lower than the benzene-ethylbenzene ratio.
In the roadside study, the w-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene concentration ratio is higher.  The YFMI
site's concentration ratios appears different from the roadside study's ratios. More specifically,
the benzene-ethylbenzene ratio is by far the highest of the four ratios, and is more than triple the
roadside study's benzene-ethylbenzene ratio.  The w-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio is significantly
lower than the benzene-ethylbenzene ratio at the YFMI site, as the benzene-ethylbenzene ratio is
so high at this site.
                                            8-4

-------
            Figure 8-1.  Detroit, Michigan Site 1 (APMI) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                         3-5

-------
          Figure 8-2. Detroit, Michigan Site 2 (DEMI) Monitoring Station
                                         ic ww
                                    T>t \
                                    VA< ^:
                                      '     '
      >xv  ' v"r .  .-     '  / 't-
        •/>U> J    '-.:v.jf>^
        •"- *•-- v  »  ',  ' '/; --^

              - ..>^.'    X:. £
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.

-------
          Figure 8-3. Detroit, Michigan Site 3 (E7MI) Monitoring Station
           "r«'~  " ^fL-'^s- * ?
   •i-—           .;:<   , ,."?** >
           .:  „   r> *:••-••:;
          • Lj*,: '     • V*£|B ;


   BEii^Fi   £'
   -              Jl' •".;«•
          H^V«WW0P<«BK^B-n^P^BAK     1 Ik i    Jb

   tfe^^^^l"     •   -^
        *^ -ffiiillfciV^i    „  " r"' •
  *ut«
      \-
    - u

   »:.'/•-
   ->l LV
                         •-  \f*
            II      'a^J.-Ljfer' !ft*»f

-|^:#-'-- -^.H> -•-^!j\---'••>

            "v          \  'A
 ~ »»*••»        .  \'
 J - ^MjHS,—.     >  X           \
   *•*     ' •   i             \ -,
     • hl^  •   V   V; »> • .       V^3
 . ' f*a*:   .,.•*-_  '-i..  ,..V         \ ,
   •  •>»—;^ja^'  •.  f*
             , ft.-^    A
   1 B  lUw»  ayy*   •  .  '-;..
          T "UFff'.TJ

                    '
           tS£>>^>*V\>


              •

                        •   V-
                            \
-------
            Figure 8-4.  Detroit, Michigan Site 4 (LOMI) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.

-------
           Figure 8-5. Detroit, Michigan Site 5 (RRMI) Monitoring Station
      ?x
          •%e*0Prrt&-;<•&
          '-'/i*ji*.  •     •     •- -*»
           '-S**^     .,"'  • 'HIV^R^if ,,r
                  .:-        ,

Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                   8-9

-------
            Figure 8-6. Detroit, Michigan Site 6 (SWMI) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        8-10

-------
            Figure 8-7. Detroit, Michigan Site 7 (YFMI) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        8-11

-------
                        Figure 8-8. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of APMI, DEMI, RRMI, SWMI, and YFMI
oo

to
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of APMI,
DEMI, RRMI, SWMI, and  YFMI
   •   APMI Site
   A   DEMI Site
   *   RRMI Site
   +   SWMI Site
   +   YFMI Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
# Unknown Industrial Classification (298)
@ N ond assi 1 able E stabl ishm ents (4)
A Mining and Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals, Except Fuels (6)
B Food and Kindred Products(20)
C Paper and A lied Products (20)
D Chemical sand Allied Products (20B)
E Petroleum Refining and Related Industries(101)
F Rutater and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (18)
G Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products (45)
H Primary Metal Industries (123)
I Fabricated Metal Prod., Excpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip.(165)
J Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer E quipment (33)
L Transportation Equipment (150)
M Meas., .^nlyz., & Cntrlg. Instrnts.; Photo., Med. a Opt. Gcte; Clcks (2)
N Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (5)
P Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (511)
Q Wholesale Trade-durable Goods (2)
R Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (161)
T Real Estate (8)
U Personal Services(4)
W Mi seel laneous R epair S ervioes (6)
X Health Services (51)
Y Educational Services (42)
ZEngineering, Accointing, Research, Mngmnt., and Rel. Srvcs. (58)
              Note: Dueto facility density and colocation,the total facilities
              cisplayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above.

-------
                            Figure 8-9. Facilities Within 10 Miles of E7MI and LOMI
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of E7MI
and LOMI
A E7MI Site
• LOMI Site
So urce Cat ego iy (N umber of Facilities)
# Unknown Industrial Classification (20)
% Paper and Allied Products (1 )
a Administration of Environmental Quality and Housing Program s(1)
D Chemicals and Allied Products (27)
E Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (2)
F Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (3)
G Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products (1 0
H Primary Metal Industries (19)
I Fabricated Metal Prod., Excpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (42)
J Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (10)
K Electronic & Other Elec. Equip. & Comps., Excp;. Com p. Equip. (1)
L Transportation Equipment (33)
M Meas., Anlyz., a Cntrl. Instrnts.; Photo. ,Med. a Opt. Gds.; Clcks (2)
N Miscellaneous Manufacturing lndustries(1)
O Transportation By Air (1 )
P Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (24)
S General Merchandise Stores (1)
T Real Estate (1)
U Personal Services (1 )
V Automotive Repair, Services, and Parking (1)
W Mi seel laneous R epair S ervi ces (1 )
X Health Services (10)
Y Educational Services (2)
Z Engineering, Accounting, Research, Mngmnt., and Rel. Srvics. (9)
'•Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing (1 )
Note: Dueto facility density and colocation, the total facilities
ci splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parentheses above.
^n

i
(
\



^

i
JV
#
D X L#
# Q
xi-




"~ DL Lj
L Z

£ #
D
J
J
P J




~^-
\
X
X

I
^^
' M
D
X
V




/Is
IIH
DD L 1
P X
^v
^



L.
LLL
zz
i
L
ILD Jf
J HPp
Z |PLW
x u*LP ,
H Y *
#
P P
^-^__



H
'l
I I
F
HI
I
#
U Y
D
L
P'P
HP p
_^-^
1234
l l l



x!
#

y\
Miles



\
/



-------
                        Table 8-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Michigan
Site
Name

APMI


DEMI


LOMI


TJOA/TT



SWMI



YFMI


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day

All
9001

sample
day

All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



145.23
(±161.92)


25.66
(±2.88)


32.14
(±19.21)

	
12.84
(±2.41)



26.35



23.02
(±5.04)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

61.32
(±2.01)
69.88
(±3.97)
61.00
(±2.00)
71.36
(±1.64)
59.98
(±2.06)
70.41
(±3.80)
^i nn
(±2.00)
69.38
(±4.82)

61.00
I'-I-T DCt\

63.00

61.00
(±2.00)
69.46
(±3.83)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

47.14
(±1.88)
55.31
(±4.23)
46.05
(±1.98)
54.91
(±2.11)
44.97
(±1.95)
54.65
(±4.23)
AA n^
(±1.98)
55.12
(±5.88)

46.05
(+] QQ\
(±i.yt>)
53.00

46.05
(±1.98)
55.08
(±4.54)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

37.36
(±1.63)
44.87
(±3.54)
36.00
(±1.63)
43.40
(±1.68)
35.54
(±1.63)
44.04
(±3.35)
7A nn
(±21.63)
43.15
(±4.82)

36.00
l'-^-^ f>1\
(±1.05)
36.25

36.00
(±1.63)
43.50
(±3.69)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

42.23
(±1.63)
49.59
(±3.57)
40.97
(±1.69)
48.60
(±1.76)
40.26
(±1.68)
48.81
(±3.48)
Afl Q"7
(±1.69)
48.71
(±4.99)

40.97
("-Li f.Q\

45.00

40.97
(±1.69)
48.76
(±3.81)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

60.69
(±0.90)
61.37
(±2.46)
57.55
(±1.16)
55.94
(±1.30)
60.04
(±0.94)
60.86
(±2.51)
^7 ^
(±1.16)
56.92
(±3.53)

57.55
/_i_ i i f.\
(±1.10)
55.33

57.55
(±1.16)
57.55
(±2.87)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

2.63
(±0.50)
1.66
(±1.12)
2.08
(±0.49)
1.79
(±0.55)
2.55
(±0.51)
2.17
(±1.18)
o ns
(±0.49)
-0.07
(±1.42)

2.08
f-l-fl AQ\

-0.41

2.08
(±0.49)
1.48
(±1.21)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

1.03
(±0.51)
1.00
(±1.30)
0.41
(±0.42)
0.82
(±0.53)
0.45
(±0.45)
0.71
(±1.23)
n A^
(±0.42)
0.81
(±1.64)

0.41
f-l-O A7\

1.69

0.41
(±0.42)
0.91
(±1.06)
oo

-------
          Table 8-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Allen Park in
                                                   Detroit, Michigan (APMI)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.51
-0.19
-0.15
0.21
0.22
0.24
0.29
0.68
0.28
0.14
0.48
0.33
0.17
0.32
Average
Temperature
0.42
-0.13
-0.01
0.32
0.27
0.35
0.40
0.61
0.39
0.14
0.47
0.43
0.28
0.36
Dew Point
Temperature
0.42
-0.34
-0.01
0.30
0.23
0.33
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.33
0.52
0.43
0.26
0.37
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.42
-0.22
-0.01
0.31
0.25
0.34
0.40
0.61
0.40
0.22
0.50
0.43
0.27
0.36
Relative
Humidity
0.05
-0.36
0.36
0.19
-0.11
0.18
0.26
0.04
0.28
0.53
0.10
0.22
0.21
0.11
u-component of
wind speed
-0.24
-0.26
-0.17
-0.12
0.17
-0.07
-0.15
-0.14
-0.13
0.15
0.32
-0.13
-0.18
-0.05
v-component of
wind speed
0.13
0.15
0.23
0.16
-0.17
-0.04
0.17
0.19
0.15
0.04
-0.04
0.18
0.12
0.23
oo

-------
          Table 8-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Dearborn in
                                                   Detroit, Michigan (DEMI)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.28
0.07
-0.08
0.10
0.06
0.18
0.03
0.21
0.03
0.38
0.06
0.03
-0.07
0.09
Average
Temperature
0.12
0.07
0.02
0.12
0.00
0.23
0.08
0.07
0.09
0.35
0.11
0.10
-0.04
0.16
Dew Point
Temperature
0.16
0.04
-0.01
0.15
0.04
0.24
0.08
0.10
0.09
0.39
0.08
0.10
-0.04
0.16
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.13
0.06
0.02
0.14
0.01
0.24
0.09
0.08
0.09
0.37
0.10
0.11
-0.03
0.17
Relative
Humidity
-0.03
0.00
0.15
0.20
0.01
0.15
0.11
-0.05
0.11
0.14
-0.01
0.16
0.06
0.17
u-component of
wind speed
-0.19
-0.09
-0.24
-0.38
-0.07
-0.15
-0.15
-0.09
-0.15
-0.25
-0.09
-0.22
0.15
-0.29
v-component of
wind speed
0.06
-0.01
0.04
0.13
0.14
0.03
-0.05
0.06
-0.06
0.15
-0.09
-0.05
0.44
-0.03
oo

-------
           Table 8-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at Lodge in
                                                   Detroit, Michigan (LOMI)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.45
-0.44
0.10
0.13
0.37
0.25
0.20
0.60
0.21
0.07
0.31
0.23
0.07
0.31
Average
Temperature
0.23
-0.06
-0.08
-0.09
0.46
0.30
-0.06
0.49
-0.06
-0.13
0.08
0.01
-0.10
0.14
Dew Point
Temperature
0.26
-0.36
-0.04
0.02
0.45
0.35
0.07
0.45
0.08
-0.04
0.19
0.14
-0.02
0.24
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.24
-0.17
-0.06
-0.05
0.47
0.33
-0.01
0.48
0.00
-0.11
0.12
0.06
-0.07
0.19
Relative
Humidity
-0.17
-0.03
-0.10
-0.04
0.08
0.23
-0.06
-0.15
-0.07
-0.19
-0.10
-0.04
0.00
-0.01
u-component of
wind speed
0.06
0.11
-0.23
-0.16
-0.29
-0.09
-0.09
0.00
-0.09
0.07
-0.10
-0.11
-0.24
-0.13
v-component of
wind speed
0.33
0.16
0.23
0.20
-0.11
-0.18
0.10
0.25
0.12
0.19
-0.08
0.16
0.10
0.15
oo

-------
oo
oo
         Table 8-2d - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at River Rouge in
                                                   Detroit, Michigan (RRMI)
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.18
0.10
0.29
0.13
0.04
0.01
0.53
0.45
0.02
-0.30
0.19
Average
Temperature
-0.11
0.04
0.52
0.53
-0.03
-0.04
0.09
0.20
-0.01
-0.09
0.01
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.16
0.03
0.44
0.43
0.00
-0.02
0.27
0.31
0.01
-0.12
0.08
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.13
0.04
0.51
0.51
-0.02
-0.03
0.16
0.24
0.01
-0.09
0.04
Relative
Humidity
0.03
0.07
0.46
0.65
0.12
0.13
-0.04
0.02
0.16
0.29
0.08
u-component of
wind speed
0.15
-0.13
-0.18
-0.13
-0.14
-0.12
-0.22
-0.48
-0.12
-0.06
-0.25
v-component of
wind speed
-0.07
-0.22
0.24
0.18
-0.29
-0.29
0.18
0.01
-0.30
-0.23
-0.29

-------
                Table 8-2e - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                Yellow Freight, Michigan (YFMI)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.35
-0.41
-0.02
0.10
0.24
0.24
0.06
0.45
0.10
0.26
-0.29
0.12
0.03
0.11
Average
Temperature
0.32
-0.28
-0.02
0.24
0.27
0.16
0.23
0.31
0.27
0.15
-0.16
0.29
0.00
0.27
Dew Point
Temperature
0.27
-0.38
-0.07
0.16
0.23
0.25
0.18
0.30
0.20
0.18
-0.22
0.22
-0.07
0.20
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.30
-0.31
-0.04
0.22
0.26
0.20
0.22
0.30
0.25
0.16
-0.18
0.27
-0.04
0.25
Relative
Humidity
-0.05
0.00
-0.05
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.15
-0.17
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.14
-0.19
0.12
u-component of
wind speed
-0.08
-0.23
0.03
0.14
-0.18
-0.22
0.13
-0.05
0.09
-0.32
0.22
0.04
0.30
0.08
v-component of
wind speed
0.22
0.23
-0.12
0.71
-0.14
-0.05
0.64
0.12
0.63
0.32
0.02
0.59
-0.19
0.70
oo

VO

-------
Table 8-3. SVOC and Ozone Measured by the Michigan Monitoring Stations
Monitoring
Station
APMI
DEMI
E7MI
LOMI
RRMI
SWMI
YFMI
Average SVOC
Concentration
5. 64 (±0.1 5) //g
6.76 (±0.70) //g
7. 15 (±0.98) //g
5. 69 (±0.26) //g
6.43 (±0.75) //g
7.43(±1.94)//g
28.35 (±8.68) //g
Average Ozone
Concentrations
from May-Aug
54.63 ppbv
N/A
60.74 ppbv
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Number of
Ozone Sampling
Days
123
N/A
123
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                8-20

-------
Table 8-4. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Michigan
                            Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
APMI
DEMI
E7MI
LOMI
RRMI
SWMI
YFMI
Population
within Ten
Miles
1,033,740
1,241,008
1,154,868
1,115,500
905,107
1,196,371
1,196,371
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
764,968
918,346
854,602
825,470
669,779
885,315
885,315
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
60,000
12,791
6,999
100,000
500
18,437
500
Average Daily UATMP
Concentration
145.23 (±161.92)ppbv
25.66 (±2.88) ppbv
N/A
32. 14 (±19.21) ppbv
12.84 (±2.41) ppbv
26.35 ppbv
23. 02 (±5. 04) ppbv
                                  8-21

-------
9.0    Sites in Mississippi
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
four UATMP sites in Mississippi (GPMS, JAMS, PGMS, and TUMS).  All four of these sites
reside in different cities in Mississippi: Gulf Port; Jackson; Pascagoula; and Tupelo. Figures 9-
1 through 9-4 are topographical maps showing the monitoring stations in their urban locations.
Figures 9-5 through 9-8 are maps identifying facilities within ten miles of the sites and that
reported to the 1999 NEI.  The GPMS and PGMS sites are the furthest south, with both locations
along the Gulf Coast.  Further east is PGMS, where the majority of the industrial sites are located
within a four mile radius of the monitoring station and are mostly chemical facilities. GPMS is
further west along the Mississippi shoreline, and the few nearby industrial facilities, which are
mainly comprised of utility companies, are mainly to the north. JAMS, somewhat centrally
located, also has few sites nearby and these  are located to the southwest of the site.  The
industrial facilities within  a ten mile radius of TUMS, which is located in northeast Mississippi,
are mainly to the east of the site. A large number of the facilities near the TUMS site are
involved in rubber and plastic producing.

       Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at four weather stations near
these sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements.  The weather observations were reported from  each of the four
cities' reporting stations (WBAN 93874, 3940, 53858, and 93862, respectively).

       Table 9-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each site,  along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days. Climatologically, all four of
the Mississippi cities can be considered warm and humid.  High temperatures and humidities,
with relatively light winds can make the region very oppressive. Annual average wind direction
for all of the sites tends to be  from the east and east-southeast.  This information can be found at
the following web sites: http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/jackson.htm and
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/mobile.htm.
                                           9-1

-------
9.1    Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Mississippi Sites
       Carbonyl compounds and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at all of the
sites, as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4.  JAMS and PGMS each sampled hydrocarbon
compounds' geometric means was more than double that of the other sites (18.21 ppbv and 18.84
ppbv, respectively).  Each of these two site hydrocarbon geometric mean was also more than
triple their other compound type geometric means. GPMS had the highest geometric means for
carbonyl and polar compounds. However, the ranges on these two compound types had the
smallest variation among all of the sites. The average total UATMP daily concentration at TUMS
was the lowest in comparison to the other three sites and was computed to be 24.17 (±8.19) ppbv.
JAMS had the highest value of 40.99 (±13.66) ppbv, while the other sites' average daily
concentration fell into the thirties.  Table 9-1 also lists the averages for selected meteorological
parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time period covered in
this report.

       Tables 9-2a-d are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of
the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological  parameters by site. Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. Acetone generally had strong
(between 0.50 and 0.75 or -0.50 and -0.75) to moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25
and -0.50) negative correlations with the majority of the weather parameters, especially the
temperature and moisture variables, at each site. One of the strongest correlations indicated
across all of the sites in the entire UATMP was acetone's very strong (between 0.75 and 1 or -
0.75 and -1) negative correlation with maximum temperature at the PGMS site (-0.81). Acetone
concentrations generally increase with decreasing maximum temperature. Several different
compounds had strong to moderately strong positive correlations with average maximum
temperature at three sites, with the exception of the TUMS site, whose compounds tended to
have an opposite correlation with maximum temperature. Also at the TUMS site, all of the
compounds had a positive correlation with relative humidity. At GPMS, JAMS, and PGMS, a
few compounds at each site had strong correlations with the temperature and moisture variables.
Nearly half of the compounds at the GPMS site had at least a moderately strong positive
correlation with at least one component of the wind, if not two.

                                          9-2

-------
9.2    Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 motor vehicles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information
on this ratio).  The population near the JAMS site is 265,530 people,  all of whom are operating
approximately 196,492 vehicles.  This site had the largest population (and most motor vehicles)
of the four Mississippi sites. The site with the lowest population was PGMS, with a population
of 59,236 people driving 43,835 motor vehicles. This information is  compared to the average
daily concentration of the prevalent compounds at each Mississippi site in Table 9-3.  Also
included in Table 9-3 are average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of
cars passing the monitoring sites  on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to  section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites. The TUMS and GPMS sites's concentration ratios resembled
that of the roadside study, although GPMS's toluene-ethylbenzene ratio was considerably higher.
At the JAMS site, the concentration ratio that was the highest was w-,/?-xylene-ethylbenzene, as
opposed to the toluene-ethylbenzene ratio of the roadside study.  The benzene-ethylbenzene
concentration ratio was higher than the w-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio at the LOMI site, which
also differed from that of the roadside study.
                                           9-3

-------
             Figure 9-1.  Gulf Port, Mississippi (GPMS) Monitoring Station
                                                   ;
                                               m  -   " .  . •          •,
                                                  • .    ;       \*\ ":
                                              ^^-^ --             -\ f.',
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                         9-4

-------
              Figure 9-2. Jackson, Mississippi (JAMS) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                         9-5

-------
          Figure 9-3. Pascagoula, Mississippi (PGMS) Monitoring Station
        •a^'"
          ""
                     .?    -r-
                                                              _.
                                             , •* i— .  . . '     i !,•»  a* *

                                             •  .    • -  .  ' l   ftli-ll-
                                    )l ;^-t
                                 "n   ^^',-.^,.-j!M;
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                9-6

-------
               Figure 9-4. Tupelo, Mississippi (TUMS) Monitoring Station
                                                                      •
                                                       •   •    '  .

                                                       -   I.
                                                                               '  X
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                         9-7

-------
                              Figure 9-5. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of GPMS
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of GPMS
• GPMS Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Limber and Wood Products, Except Furniture (2)
B Furniture and Fixtures (1)
C Chemical sand Allied Products (1)
D Stone , C lay, G lass , and C oner ete P roducts (1 )
E Primary Metal Industries (1)
F Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (1)
G Transportation Equipment (2)
H Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (5)
I Health ServicesOl)
J National Security and International Affairs (1)
K Unknown Industrial Classification (6)
Note: D ue to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
d splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above
Q
Mississippi

/
I


^
/ K
C
K E
I
^
"~~ 	 --.



AHH
GO FR
B H
J
•

__ — — "~
0
L

^
D

y
1234 Mile:
i i i i


\
/
\

VO
oo

-------
                               Figure 9-6. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of JAMS
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of JAMS
• JAMS Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Mi ning and Quarryi ng of N onm etalli c M inerals, E xcept Fuel s (1 )
B Food and Kindred Products (1)
C Furniture and Fixtures (2)
D Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (1)
E Rubber snd Miscellaneous Plastics Products (6)
F Fabricated Metal Prod., Excpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (4)
G Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (3)
H Transportation Equipment (1 ')
I E lectric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (3)
J Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (1 )
K Business Services (1 )
L Unknown Industrial Classification (1 )
M Lumber and Wood Products, Except Furniture (1)
N Printing, Publishing, and Allied Industries (1 )
O Chem i cals and Al li ed P roducts (1 )
P Primary Metal Industries (2)
Q Electronic a OtherElec. Equip, a Comps., Excpt. Comp. Equip. (1)
R National Security and International Affairs (1 )













/ 1
} • /
Mississippi

/
,/
/
/
/
/
I
j
j

S
\



\ K
\
\
\
\
\

\
\
V-





^^^
,s
/










M



1
L
J E C

C
fc 0

F
C
B
^\ A
X.^ D
^^^ c
^^^



~-^









N




F





PP
E E
I


F
Q
____---''
0 1
I I



•\
\


















R
E



/
/
^s*"^
234 Miles
I I I





















/
/






i



VO

-------
                              Figure 9-7. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of PGMS
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of PGMS
• PGMS Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A P aper and All led P raducts (2)
B Chemicals and Allied Products (S)
C Rubber and Miscellaneous P lastics Products (1 )
D Primary Metal Industries (1)
E Fabricated Metal Prod., E >rpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (2)
F Transportation Equipment (4)
G Water Transportation (1 )
H E I ectri c, Gas , and Sanitary S ervi ces (1 )
I Unknown Industrial Classification (1 )
Note: D ue to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
d splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses abovie
Q \
Mississippi ^^
/
\
V

X/

r
"\.


B
F
B
C F
G •
B E

_______

~^^
AA
B
I
B
/
0123
I I I I


\
I
A
4 Miles
j

VO



o

-------
Figure 9-8. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of TUMS
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of TUMS
• TUMS Site
Source Categoiy (Number of Facilities)
A Furniture and Figures (5)
B Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (15)
C Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products!;!)
D P rim ary M etal 1 ndustries (1 )
E Fabricated Metal Prod., E xcpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (2)
F Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (2)
G Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (1 )
H Health Services (1)
I Unknown Industrial Classification (1 )
J Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (1 )






Note: D ue to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
ci splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above
/"•]
i

^J
Mississippi





/
/
[

I
\
y
\


/
X
/
/ B
/








\




^^~






B
B










~^\^


F
F


G
B H
A
B B B
I E
B ^ C
E E

BA B B
BD
0123
I I I I








\
\


I
/
i /
A /
/
7 \
A Miles
I


-------
                        Table 9-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Mississippi
Site
Name

GPMS


JAMS


PGMS


TTTN/TQ


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



34.98
(±20.21)


40.99
(±13.66)


31.33
(±8.26)

	
24.17
(±8.19)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

76.72
(±1.17)
80.64
(±5.99)
76.27
(±1.42)
82.60
(±4.13)
78.93
(±1.17)
83.53
(±4.63)
11 T(
(±1.64)
79.87
(±5.70)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

57.20
(±1.47)
63.98
(±6.59)
54.33
(±1.63)
60.76
(±5.96)
49.45
(±1.50)
55.28
(±7.23)
^7 ni
(±1.68)
59.14
(±6.05)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

49.66 (±1.38)

55.43
(±7.30)
46.31
(±1.49)
51.89
(±5.42)
43.41
(±1.37)
48.64
(±6.83)
A7 CK
(±1.53)
50.31
(±5.69)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

52.58
(±1.34)
58.59
(±6.76)
49.76
(±1.47)
55.44
(±5.35)
45.56
(±1.40)
50.65
(±6.99)
AS fK
(±1.50)
53.93
(±5.47)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

64.32
(±1.21)
70.27
(±4.58)
62.62
(±1.29)
62.38
(±7.65)
58.18
(±1.52)
62.38
(±7.65)
AH CK
(±1.27)
65.11
(±5.11)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-1.05
(±0.31)
-0.67
(±0.80)
-0.61
(±0.22)
-0.82
(±0.66)
-0.93
(±0.25)
-0.59
(±0.99)
n o^
(±0.24)
-0.51
(±0.90)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

0.18
(±0.43)
-2.10
(±1.60)
0.12
(±0.38)
-0.37
(±1.49)
-0.19
(±0.32)
-1.15
(±0.97)
n 1 1
(±0.47)
-1.03
(±2.00)
VO



to

-------
                Table 9-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                  Gulf Port, Mississippi (GPMS)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.01
-0.47
-0.25
-0.14
0.10
-0.22
0.62
0.62
0.61
-0.13
0.25
0.36
-0.24
0.61
Average
Temperature
0.03
-0.53
-0.45
-0.37
-0.10
-0.26
0.16
0.57
0.10
-0.28
-0.12
-0.18
-0.47
0.39
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.09
-0.64
-0.45
-0.32
0.06
-0.29
0.29
0.58
0.25
-0.22
-0.04
-0.03
-0.42
0.44
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.02
-0.58
-0.43
-0.32
-0.03
-0.28
0.25
0.58
0.20
-0.23
-0.06
-0.09
-0.42
0.43
Relative
Humidity
-0.22
-0.34
-0.25
-0.22
0.04
-0.38
0.16
0.18
0.10
-0.07
0.01
-0.12
-0.25
0.18
u-component of
wind speed
-0.05
-0.14
0.05
0.13
0.28
0.03
0.61
0.22
0.66
0.00
0.33
0.66
0.07
0.42
v-component of
wind speed
0.13
0.00
0.29
0.38
0.03
-0.38
0.44
0.01
0.38
0.15
0.47
0.32
0.24
0.42
VO

-------
                Table 9-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                  Jackson, Mississippi (JAMS)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.07
-0.48
-0.28
-0.15
0.29
0.08
0.43
0.32
0.46
0.36
-0.05
0.44
-0.16
0.31
Average
Temperature
0.02
-0.44
-0.16
0.05
0.03
0.18
0.03
0.53
0.05
0.54
0.15
-0.11
0.03
-0.04
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.12
-0.59
-0.22
-0.02
0.14
0.15
0.09
0.43
0.12
0.63
0.18
0.02
-0.06
0.03
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.05
-0.51
-0.19
0.03
0.08
0.16
0.04
0.48
0.06
0.59
0.18
-0.07
0.00
-0.02
Relative
Humidity
-0.08
-0.20
0.32
0.51
0.01
0.15
-0.47
0.16
-0.46
0.54
0.44
-0.41
0.49
-0.42
u-component of
wind speed
-0.03
-0.02
0.11
0.15
-0.55
-0.40
-0.18
-0.01
-0.18
-0.07
0.15
-0.46
0.09
-0.15
v-component of
wind speed
0.12
0.09
-0.04
0.04
0.11
-0.05
0.25
0.13
0.24
-0.08
-0.22
0.19
-0.02
0.27
VO

-------
                Table 9-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                 Pascagoula, Mississippi (PGMS)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.30
-0.81
-0.07
0.05
0.40
0.08
0.40
-0.04
0.37
0.62
0.24
0.35
-0.01
0.42
Average
Temperature
-0.28
-0.35
-0.14
-0.03
0.49
0.63
0.38
-0.13
0.38
0.01
0.12
0.40
-0.02
0.30
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.31
-0.50
-0.23
-0.09
0.58
0.55
0.50
-0.10
0.49
0.13
0.09
0.51
-0.09
0.41
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.31
-0.36
-0.18
-0.07
0.51
0.58
0.39
-0.17
0.39
0.04
0.13
0.42
-0.03
0.30
Relative
Humidity
-0.11
0.10
0.01
0.08
0.31
0.47
0.13
-0.15
0.14
-0.19
0.15
0.18
0.17
0.08
u-component of
wind speed
0.23
0.18
0.16
0.11
0.13
-0.03
0.11
0.23
0.11
-0.05
0.11
0.10
0.12
0.13
v-component of
wind speed
-0.17
-0.34
0.21
0.33
0.15
-0.34
0.28
-0.16
0.26
0.22
0.06
0.26
0.23
0.37
VO

-------
               Table 9-2d - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                  Tupelo, Mississippi (TUMS)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.28
-0.44
-0.23
-0.26
-0.22
-0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.26
-0.06
0.01
-0.31
-0.01
Average
Temperature
0.03
-0.36
-0.22
-0.24
0.21
0.11
0.35
0.42
0.35
-0.02
0.20
0.36
-0.33
0.35
Dew Point
Temperature
0.05
-0.32
-0.13
-0.16
0.21
0.08
0.29
0.37
0.29
0.00
0.23
0.30
-0.24
0.29
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.05
-0.34
-0.18
-0.20
0.23
0.11
0.33
0.42
0.34
0.00
0.23
0.34
-0.29
0.33
Relative
Humidity
0.30
0.18
0.24
0.20
0.32
0.41
0.22
0.17
0.22
0.26
0.45
0.21
0.21
0.24
u-component of
wind speed
0.16
0.02
0.13
0.14
0.19
0.21
-0.13
0.37
-0.12
0.01
0.23
-0.12
0.06
-0.11
v-component of
wind speed
0.13
0.17
0.50
0.45
-0.07
-0.16
-0.15
-0.03
-0.15
-0.04
0.28
-0.14
0.40
-0.12
VO

-------
Table 9-3. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Mississippi
                             Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
GPMS
JAMS
PGMS
TUMS
Population
within Ten
Miles
177,534
265,530
59,236
70,981
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
131,375
196,492
43,835
52,526
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
17,000
12,500
8,600
4,900
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
34.98 (±20.21) ppbv
40.99(±13.66)ppbv
31.33 (±8.26) ppbv
24. 17 (±8. 19) ppbv
                                   9-17

-------
10.0   Sites in Missouri
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
three UATMP sites in Missouri (S2MO, S3MO, and SLMO).  All three of these sites reside in
the St. Louis metropolitan statistical area.  Figures 10-1 through 10-3 are topographical maps
showing the monitoring stations in their urban locations. Figure 10-4 is a map identifying
facilities within ten miles of the sites that reported to the 1999 NEI. Many of these facilities are
classified as unknown industries.  A large number of chemical producing industries are also
located near the sites.

       Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at a weather station near these
sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements.  The weather station is Cahokia-St. Louis (WBAN 3960).

       Table 10-1  highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of these sites, along
with temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature,
average wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u-
and v- components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days. St. Louis has a climate
that is continental in nature, with cold, rather dry winters, warm, somewhat wetter summers, and
a significant seasonal variability.  Wind speeds are generally light and wind flows from the
southwest on average. This information can be found at the following web site:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/stlouis.htm.

10.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Missouri Sites
       Carbonyl compounds were not measured at two of the sites, but were measured at SLMO,
as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4. All three sites' geometric means for halogenated
hydrocarbons and polar compounds were relatively close to each other, reporting values of 3.33
ppbv and 2.38 ppbv (S2MO), 3.30 ppbv and 2.31 ppbv (S2MO), and 3.83 ppbv and 2.53 ppbv
(SLMO).  Hydrocarbon compounds had more variability, due to SLMO's geometric mean of
11.63 ppbv, more than twice the other two sites' geometric means. The average total UATMP
daily concentration at SLMO was over triple the concentration of the other two sites (47.14

                                          10-1

-------
±19.41 ppbv vs. 13.43 ±2.87 and 13.41 ±3.00 ppbv). Table 10-1 also lists the averages for
selected meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the
time period covered in this report.

       SLMO also opted to have total and SNMOC and SVOC sampled during its air toxic
sampling. SNMOC/NMOC compounds are of particular interest because of their role in ozone
formation. Readers are encouraged to review EPA's 2001 Nonmethane Organic Compounds
(NMOC) and Speciated Nonmethane Organic Compounds (SNMOC) Monitoring Program, Final
Report (EPA, 2002) for more information on SNMOC/NMOC trends and concentrations.  The
average total NMOC value for SLMO was 313 (±37.91) ppbC, of which nearly 56% could be
identified through speciation. Of the speciated compounds, m-,p-xy\ene measured the highest
concentration at the SLMO site (18.33 ppbC). Typical sources ofw-,/»-xylene include
evaporative losses, spills, and leaks from petroleum refining, coal tar production, solvents, and
losses of during gasoling transport and storage. SVOC concentrations at the SLMO site averaged
5.90 (±0.25) ppbv. This information is given in Table 10-3.

        Tables 10-2a-c are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each
of the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site. Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. At SLMO, where carbonyls  were
measured as well as the hydrocarbons, both acetaldehyde and acetone showed strong (between
0.50 and 0.75 or -0.50 and -0.75) negative correlations with average maximum temperature, and
moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and -0.50) negative  correlations with average
temperature, dew point and wet bulb temperature.  As temperature and  moisture content increase,
carbonyl concentrations at SLMO decrease. A large number of the VOC showed a negative
correlation with the four previously mentioned weather parameters, with strengths ranging from
weak (between 0 and 0.25 or 0 and -0.25) to strong at the S2MO and S3MO sites, but this  trend
wasn't consistent at the SLMO site.  In fact, very few correlations reached the moderately  strong
category (greater than 0.25 or less than -0.25) at the SLMO  site.

10.2   Spatial Analysis

                                          10-2

-------
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 motor vehicles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information
on this ratio). The population near the S2MO and SLMO sites is 807,997 people, all of whom
are operating approximately 597,918 motor vehicles. The S3MO site is populated with 725,662
people driving 536,990 motor vehicles. This information is compared to the average daily
concentration of the prevalent compounds at each Missouri site in Table 10-3. Also included in
Table 10-3 are average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars passing
the monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites. S2MO and S3MO's concentration ratios looked relatively similar
to the roadside study, with the exception of the w-,/»-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio being lower than
the benzene-ethylbenzene ratio at the two sites. The toluene-ethylbenzene ratio and the m-,p-
xylene-ethylbenzene ratio are almost the same value at the SLMO site, which is different than the
roadside study as well.
                                           10-2

-------
              Figure 10-1. St. Louis, Missouri (SLMO) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        10-4

-------
              Figure 10-2. St. Louis, Missouri (S2MO) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        10-5

-------
               Figure 10-3. St. Louis, Missouri (S3MO) Monitoring Station
                                           .'P^p^sSt^v-i^JJ.-. 1 . f. {" '         '" • •• *" ^
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                          10-6

-------
                   Figure  10-4.  Facilities Located Within  10 Miles of S2MO, S3MO, and SLMO
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of S2MO,
S3MO, and SLMO

   •  S2MO Site

   ^  S3MO Site

   *  SLMO Site
 Source Category (Number of Facilities)
 ! Business Services (3)
 # National Security and International Affairs (2)
 % N ondassifi stol e E stabli shm ents (11)
 @ Educational Services (13)
 A Food and Kindred Products (17)
 B Furniture and F Mures (1)
 C Printing, Publishing, and Allied Industries(8)
 D Chemicals and Allied Products (78)
 E Petroleum Refining and  Related Industries(7)
 F Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (1)
 G Primary Metal Industries (31)
 H Fata. Metal Prods., Excpt. Mchny. & Trans. E quip. (20)
 I ElecS Elect. Equip. & Comps., Excpt.Comp. Equip. (3)
 J Meas, Anlyz, & Cortr Instr; Photo, Med & Opt Gds; Clks (2)
 K Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (17)
 L Whol esale T rade-non-durabl e G oods (26)
 M Personal Services(5)
 N Health Services(7)
 O Unknown Industrial CI assrfi cation (87)
 P MineS Quarry of Nonmetsl Win., Excpt. FIs. (4)
 Q Lumber and Wood Products, Except Furniture (2)
 R Stone, C lay, G lass, and  C oncrete P roducts (18)
 S Ind. & Comm. Machinery £ Comp. Equip. (4)
 T Transportation Equipment (4)
 U Railroad Transportation  (4)
 V Transportation by Air (2)
 W Pipelines, Except Natural Gas (2)
 X Wholesale Trade-durable Goods  (4)
 Y Food Stores (2)
 ZMiscellaneous Retail (2)
 A Agricultural Services (1)
Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
displayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above.

-------
                        Table 10-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Missouri
Site
Name

S2MO


S3MO


SLMO


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



13.43
(±2.87)


13.41
(±3.00)


47.14
(±19.41)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

69.47
(±1.98)
78.00
(±3.65)
69.47
(±1.98)
79.35
(±3.88)
69.47
(±1.98)
78.09
(±3.69)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

49.42
(±1.84)
55.75
(±5.10)
49.42
(±1.84)
55.86
(±5.65)
49.42
(±1.84)
54.58
(±5.04)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

41.26
(±1.65)
48.24
(±4.28)
41.26
(±1.65)
48.58
(±4.65)
41.26
(±1.65)
47.18
(±4.17)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

45.03
(±1.64)
51.26
(±4.44)
45.03
(±1.64)
51.40
(±4.90)
45.03
(±1.64)
50.16
(±4.36)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

62.02
(±1.23)
63.37
(±3.20)
62.02
(±1.23)
61.42
(±3.80)
62.02
(±1.23)
61.97
(±3.53)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

0.39
(±0.37)
-0.43
(±0.83)
0.39
(±0.37)
-0.57
(±0.88)
0.39
(±0.37)
-0.47
(±0.84)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

0.58
(±0.42)
1.07
(±0.99)
0.58
(±0.42)
1.29
(±0.90)
0.58
(±0.42)
1.15
(±0.99)
o
oo

-------
Table 10-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                 St. Louis, Missouri Site 2 (S2MO)
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.41
-0.17
0.32
0.18
-0.12
-0.17
-0.19
0.16
-0.17
-0.21
0.05
Average
Temperature
-0.46
-0.13
0.24
0.04
-0.27
-0.29
-0.27
0.19
-0.23
-0.25
-0.10
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.49
-0.15
0.27
0.05
-0.28
-0.31
-0.26
0.17
-0.25
-0.29
-0.09
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.48
-0.14
0.26
0.04
-0.28
-0.30
-0.27
0.18
-0.25
-0.27
-0.10
Relative
Humidity
-0.27
0.19
0.11
0.00
-0.07
-0.07
-0.10
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.00
u-component of
wind speed
0.43
-0.08
-0.03
-0.05
0.09
0.11
0.44
-0.28
0.09
0.09
-0.04
v-component of
wind speed
-0.22
-0.12
-0.13
-0.17
-0.14
-0.13
-0.17
0.08
-0.12
-0.06
-0.21

-------
o
o
               Table 10-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                St. Louis, Missouri Site 3 (S3MO)
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.40
-0.23
0.44
0.03
-0.21
-0.25
0.23
0.00
-0.26
-0.24
-0.15
Average
Temperature
-0.44
-0.35
0.04
-0.05
-0.39
-0.42
-0.01
-0.24
-0.41
-0.36
-0.40
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.47
-0.35
0.09
-0.04
-0.40
-0.43
-0.01
-0.26
-0.42
-0.38
-0.41
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.46
-0.35
0.05
-0.05
-0.40
-0.43
-0.02
-0.26
-0.42
-0.38
-0.42
Relative
Humidity
-0.16
-0.13
-0.24
0.04
-0.24
-0.25
-0.21
-0.30
-0.23
-0.17
-0.34
u-component of
wind speed
0.14
0.06
-0.04
0.12
0.17
0.19
-0.05
0.08
0.18
0.13
0.11
v-component of
wind speed
-0.13
-0.30
0.03
-0.24
-0.24
-0.21
-0.04
-0.02
-0.21
-0.27
-0.14

-------
Table 10-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                 St. Louis, Missouri Site 1 (SLMO)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.65
-0.74
-0.24
-0.15
0.23
0.11
0.13
-0.38
0.17
0.24
-0.24
0.06
-0.10
0.16
Average
Temperature
-0.29
-0.27
-0.16
-0.16
0.22
-0.08
0.06
-0.17
0.11
0.29
-0.16
0.01
-0.16
0.06
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.38
-0.35
-0.20
-0.18
0.18
-0.06
0.07
-0.21
0.13
0.33
-0.14
0.00
-0.20
0.09
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.32
-0.30
-0.18
-0.17
0.20
-0.08
0.06
-0.19
0.11
0.31
-0.15
-0.01
-0.18
0.06
Relative
Humidity
0.18
0.23
0.09
0.10
-0.15
-0.13
-0.33
0.08
-0.30
0.12
-0.13
-0.28
0.00
-0.33
u-component of
wind speed
0.25
0.24
-0.04
-0.15
0.13
-0.01
-0.13
0.19
-0.15
-0.19
0.29
-0.17
-0.09
-0.11
v-component of
wind speed
0.05
0.08
0.11
0.04
0.02
-0.14
0.08
-0.06
0.07
-0.05
0.18
0.13
0.09
0.14

-------
                     Table 10-3. SVOC and SNMOC Measured by the St. Louis, MO (SLMO) Monitoring Station
Average
SVOC
Concentration
5. 90 (±0.25) //g
TNMOC
(speciated)
174 (±26.78)
ppbC
TNMOC (with
unknowns)
313 (±37.91)
ppbC
% of TNMOC
Identified
56%
SNMOC
Compound with
the Highest
Concentration
m-,p-xy\ene (18.33
ppbC)
Typical Emission Sources
Evaporative losses, spills and leaks
from petroleum refining, coal tar
production, solvents, losses during
gasoline transport and storage
o
to

-------
Table 10-4. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Missouri
                            Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
S2MO
S3MO
SLMO
Population
within Ten
Miles
807,997
725,662
807,997
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
597,918
536,990
597,918
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
1,000
8,532
15,016
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
13.43 (±2.87) ppbv
13.41 (±3. 00) ppbv
47. 14 (±19.41) ppbv
                                  10-13

-------
11.0   Sites in New Jersey
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
four UATMP sites in New Jersey (CANJ, CHNJ, ELNJ, and NBNJ). Each of the four sites is
located in different cities (Camden, Chester, Elizabeth, and New Brunswick, respectively).
Figures 11-1 through 11-4 are topographical maps showing the monitoring stations in their urban
locations. Figures 11-5 through 11-7 are maps identifying facilities within ten miles of the sites
that reported to the 1999 NEI. CANJ is located on the southeast side of the state, near the PA/NJ
border and has a number of facilities located mainly to its north and west.  CHNJ is located in the
north-central part  of New Jersey and has only ten industrial sites nearby, most of which lie just
within the ten mile radius from the site.  ELNJ and NBNJ are somewhat closer to each other,
with the outer portions of their ten mile radius intersecting.  These two sites are near the New
Jersey/New York  border, just west of Staten Island, and have a number of industrial facilities in
the vicinity, most  of which are chemical producers.

       Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at three weather stations near
these sites with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements.  The weather stations are Philadelphia, Newark International
Airport, and Somerville, NJ (WBAN 94732, 14734, and 54785, respectively).

       Table 11-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of these sites, along
with temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature,
average wet-bulb  temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u-
and v- components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days. New Jersey is located
in a region where  most storm systems track across, allowing its weather to be somewhat variable.
However, its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean has a moderating effect. Hence, summers along the
coast tend to be cooler than areas  farther inland, while winters tend to be warmer.  Its location
also tends to allow for ample annual precipitation and often high humidity.  To demonstrate this
point, Elizabeth, the Jersey city closest to the ocean, claims the highest average temperature,
highest average dew point and wet bulb  temperature, and highest average relative humidity out of
the four New Jersey sites.  This information is presented in Table 11-1. Annual average wind

                                          11-1

-------
direction is from the northwest for all of the sites located in New Jersey.  However, wind speeds
tend to vary. This information can be found at the following web sites:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/newyork.htm and
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/philly.htm.

11.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the New Jersey Sites
       Carbonyl compound and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at all four of
the sites, as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4. NBNJ had the highest reported geometric means for
both carbonyls (5.67 ppbv) and hydrocarbons (16.11 ppbv), and this hydrocarbon value was the
highest of all of the geometric means at all sites for all compound types.  Hydrocarbons had the
highest geometric mean reported for CANJ, ELNJ, and NBNJ, while halogenated hydrocarbons
had the highest geometric mean at CHNJ. CANJ consistently had the lowest reported geometric
means, with the exception of the polar compounds, where it came in second lowest to CHNJ
(2.42 ppbv at CANJ vs. 1.95 ppbv at CHNJ).  The average total UATMP daily concentration  at
NBNJ was also the highest at 48.16 (±12.86) ppbv, while CANJ was again the lowest average
value at 22.11 (±5.24) ppbv. NBNJ's value is more than double that of CANJ, and surpasses the
other two sites by nearly 40 percent.  Table 11-1 also lists the averages for selected
meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time
period  covered in this report.

       SVOC concentrations were sampled at all four of the sites. Average SVOC
concentrations ranged from 5.48 (±0.09) //g at NBNJ to 181.42 (±21.87) //g at CANJ. Ozone
concentrations were also  sampled at  CANJ and CHNJ on 61 sample days, and were retrieved
from the U.S. EPA's AIRS database. The average ozone concentration for each sample day was
65.95 ppbv and 64.16 ppbv, respectively. Unfortunately, ozone concentrations were not sampled
at the other sites. Information on SVOC and ozone concentrations is given in Table 11-3.

       Tables  1 l-2a-d are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of
the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site. Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report.  At ELNJ, the majority of the

                                         11-2

-------
correlations between each compound and temperature and moisture parameters were weak
(between 0 and 0.25 or 0 and -0.25) to moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and -
0.50) and positive. (The few that didn't tended to be acetone, acetylene, and benzene, of which
almost all correlations were negative.)  Also, the correlation between the compounds and the
wind components tended to be moderately strong and positive (acetone, acetylene, and benzene
included). Concentrations at ELNJ tended to increase as the majority of the weather variables
increase. CANJ didn't have any correlations that fall into the strong category (between 0.50 and
0.75 or -0.50 and -0.75). However, acetone, acetylene, and benzene seem to follow the same
tendency that they did at ELNJ for the various weather parameters. As a matter of fact, these
three compounds had similar correlations at all four sites. The moisture variables and the
average temperature had nearly all negative correlations of various strengths at the CHNJ sites,
while the v-component of the wind had mostly weak to moderately strong positive correlations to
the majority of the compounds. At the NBNJ site, over half of the compounds demonstrated
moderately strong to strong positive correlations with the maximum temperature.

11.2   Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 motor vehicles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information
on this ratio).  The population near the CANJ site is 2,113,778 people, all of whom are operating
approximately 1,564,196 motor vehicles.  This site had the largest population (and vehicles) of
the four New Jersey sites.  The site with the lowest population was CFINJ, with a population of
239,072 people driving 176,913 motor vehicles. This information is compared to the average
daily concentration of the prevalent compounds at each New Jersey site in Table 11-4. Also
included in Table 11-4 are average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of
cars  passing the monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the

                                          11-3

-------
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites.  The CANJ site has a benzene-ethylbenzene concentration ratio
that is higher than its m-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio, which is different than those of the
roadside study. The ELNJ site also has a higher benzene-ethylbenzene concentration ratio than
its m-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio. The CHNJ site has a very low concentration ratio for
benzene-ethylbenzene, as does NBNJ. The NBNJ site's ratios look very different from the
roadside study's ratios. The highest ratio is m-,/»-xylene-ethylbenzene, as opposed to toluene-
ethylbenzene at not only the roadside study, but also the other three New Jersey sites. Also at
NBNJ, the o-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio is higher than the benzene-ethylbenzene ratio, which also
occurs at CHNJ. Generally, the New Jersey sites didn't remain consistent with the roadside
study.
                                           11-4

-------
             Figure 11-1. Camden, New Jersey (CANJ) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                       11-5

-------
             Figure 11-2.  Chester, New Jersey (CHNJ) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        11-6

-------
             Figure 11-3. Elizabeth, New Jersey (ELNJ) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                        11-7

-------
         Figure 11-4. New Brunswick, New Jersey (NBNJ) Monitoring Station
                              ••-—  j •.    .'*JF,''
                        f    f Eft  y//;
                         "FILH&**:  \^f  /
                                                  k  «         J-V.V"' "  •

                                                            • r'      ''
        r,1;?
                          -/'

Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                   11-8

-------
Figure 11-5. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of ELNJ and NBNJ
C~i s* i 1 it i A e* 1 ss <"• n+a s-J XA/i+ltin -in Mil AC* f\f C\ hi 1
Facilities Located vvitnin lu miles or CLNJ
and NBNJ
• ELNJ Site
A NBNJ Site
So urce Cat ego ry (Number of Facilties)
A Food and Kindred Products (7)
B Paper and Allied Products (15)
C Printing, Publishing, and Allied Industries (6)
D Chemicals and Allied Products (147)
E Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (30)
F Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (22)
G Leather and Leather Products (3)
H Primary Metal Industries (24)
I Fab. Metal Prods., Esicpt. Machinery a Trans. Equip. (39)
J Ind. & Comm. Machinery a Comp. Equip. (2)
K Elec. a Other Elect. Equip, a Comps., Excpt. Comp. Equip. (5)
L T ransportation E qui pm ent (7)
M Meas., Anlyz., a Cntr.lnstr.; Photo., Med. a Opt. Gds.; Clks. (B)
N Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (2)
O Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (SO)
P Wholesale Trade-durable Goods (6)
Q Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (40)
R Real Estate (2)
S Business Services (2)
T l-)''---ilrh ^aKwir^ft* i'1 T^
i neann oervices ij j^i
U Eng., Accruing., Res., Mngmnt., & Rel. Srvcs. (2)
V Unknown Industrial Classification (64)



Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
displayed may not equal the number of facilities in parentheses above
/-^
(^
> ?
C /
S/



















/
I
\

















/^
/'
S D
D
B
B


C
D
\ V
^y
\^


















^-— 	
3 	 F
F
DM I h
D QH
D

V

— F^—
,KK D
1 IK BDA
D

y
D
F^ 0








/
/
/*t


1
!


_J
~V— ^
M \
*b \
D \
-)P \
C C D\
D D | \
G c L
v LF B

V
V
o y
o
B
B


^






^^^
/^

1

JD
H D 0
O
V
1

DDLD

BVhl S\
vvl
Q \^
1.
D\ E
V||S
^&E T
3 D\ijo
H 0
( H
Q /
/
/
-^









1
D
D
HD R
D v
	 |_JL_ 	
F '
D DO
A V*0E
O
QQ°Q


"E D
o

3
A
\ 	 ~~
j

0123
I I I I







~~^-^
JNj
















s*
^^



Miles










N^^
\.
\
\
\
\




/
/
/'






\







-------
                              Figure 11-6.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CHNJ
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CHNJ
      •  CHNJ Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Furniture and F Mures (1)
B Chemicals and Allied Products (2)
C EI ectri c, Gas, and Sanitary S ervi ces (2)
D Health Services(2)
E Unknown Industrial Classification (2)
F Real Estate (1)
                                                                                          0123
                                                                                          I    I    I   I
4 Miles
j

-------
Figure 11-7. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CANJ
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of CANJ
• CANJ Site
So urce Cat ego iy (N umber of Facilities)
! M i seel laneous R epa r Servi ces (1 )
# Executive, Legislative, and General Government, Excpt. Finance (1;
% Justice i P ubli c Order, and Safety (1 )
@ Educational Services (5)
A Food and Kindred Products (2)
B Chemicals and Allied Products( 39)
C Rubber and Miscellaneous P lastics Products (3)
D P rim ary M etal I ndustries (8)
E Fabricated Metal Prod., E xcpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (4)
F Railroad Transportation (1)
G Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (1 8)
H Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (1 3)
I Health Services (16)

J Unknown Industrial C I assh cation (13)
K Oil and Gas Extraction (1 )
L Textile Mill Products (3)
M Furniture and Fixtures (1)
N P aper and Al II ed P roducts (N )
O Printing, Publishing, and AJIied Industries (2)
P Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (7)
Q Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete P roducts (1)
R Elec. a Othr. Elect. Equip, a Comps., Excpt. Camp. Equip. (1)
S Transportation Equipment (2)
T Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (2)
U Local and Suburban Transit & Interurban Hi^iwy. Pass. Trans. (1)
V Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing (1)
W Water Transportation (1 )
X Transportation by Air (1 )
Y Real E state (2)
Z Personal Services (2)
A National Security and International Affairs (2)


Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
ci splayed may not equal the num ber of facilities in parantheses above
y~\
r 2
-^ j
s* J
"^/





/
/
/
1
1

j
I
\

B


\ B
V




















/^
/^
/^
//B N
/ B A

3 @

Z Y


1 1 @
B GG
z H 0 0
B P ,
HH
H H
H
G D"
X T
W


'"' BB
3 G B Q
P F
\ B B

\_ D
^X H









,^-— — 	
£
J'l '[
1
N i
L
I'i'Y1 '
J
-------
Table 11-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in New Jersey
Site
Name

CANJ


CHNJ


ELNJ


XTRXTT


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



22.11
(±5.24)


27.52
(±8.71)


30.37
(±6.72)

	
48.16
(±12.86)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

66.63
(±1.91)
70.71
(±4.48)
64.64
(±1.97)
74.13
(±3.64)
65.74
(±1.88)
68.09
(±4.78)
f,i f,i
(±1.97)
73.86
(±3.63)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

50.75
(±1.80)
53.41
(±4.45)
43.49
(±1.63)
48.40
(±3.74)
52.97
(±1.76)
55.40
(±4.58)
A^ AQ
(±1.63)
47.82
(±3.48)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

38.97
(±1.58)
41.48
(±4.06)
34.43
(±1.44)
40.71
(±3.10)
40.41
(±1.64)
43.59
(±4.33)
1A A1
(±1.44)
40.18
(±2.97)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

44.70
(±1.54)
47.02
(±3.90)
39.11
(±1.43)
44.17
(±3.25)
46.75
(±1.52)
49.33
(±4.04)
1Q 1 1
(±1.43)
43.67
(±3.03)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

57.48
(±1.27)
56.72
(±3.78)
57.50
(±1.52)
59.25
(±4.58)
58.55
(±1.23)
60.17
(±2.70)
^"7 ^n
(±1.52)
58.64
(±4.25)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

1.91
(±0.46)
1.29
(±1.22)
0.23
(±0.20)
0.12
(±0.45)
2.44
(±0.52)
2.07
(±1.28)
n T?
(±0.20)
0.07
(±0.42)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-1.11
(±0.39)
-1.11
(±0.87)
-1.12
(±0.30)
-0.76
(±0.74)
-1.28
(±0.53)
-1.08
(±1.23)
110
(±0.30)
-0.87
(±0.73)

-------
Table ll-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                  Camden, New Jersey (CANJ)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Ylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.09
-0.35
-0.37
-0.01
0.41
0.22
-0.01
0.15
-0.03
0.14
0.03
-0.06
0.02
-0.07
Average
Temperature
-0.03
-0.25
-0.38
-0.10
0.08
0.01
-0.08
-0.01
-0.08
0.16
0.00
-0.10
-0.11
-0.10
Dew Point
Temperature
0.01
-0.25
-0.27
-0.01
0.25
0.09
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.10
0.01
-0.04
-0.01
-0.05
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.03
-0.25
-0.34
-0.08
0.15
0.04
-0.05
0.00
-0.05
0.12
0.00
-0.08
-0.08
-0.09
Relative
Humidity
0.05
0.19
0.23
0.19
-0.08
0.00
0.17
-0.05
0.15
-0.12
0.06
0.13
0.18
0.12
u-component of
wind speed
-0.01
0.00
0.14
0.22
-0.12
-0.01
0.24
-0.18
0.26
-0.02
0.28
0.25
0.24
0.31
v-component of
wind speed
-0.01
-0.06
0.03
0.05
0.20
0.18
-0.03
-0.12
-0.03
0.27
-0.20
-0.06
0.15
-0.10

-------
Table ll-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                   Chester, New Jersey (CHNJ)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.27
-0.47
-0.43
-0.31
0.07
0.29
0.19
0.19
0.16
-0.03
-0.59
0.06
-0.29
0.15
Average
Temperature
-0.19
-0.04
-0.43
-0.19
-0.39
0.11
-0.31
-0.14
-0.29
-0.24
-0.20
-0.31
-0.53
-0.22
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.17
-0.04
-0.41
-0.22
-0.26
0.20
-0.17
-0.04
-0.14
-0.25
-0.25
-0.15
-0.45
-0.11
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.17
-0.03
-0.41
-0.19
-0.34
0.14
-0.27
-0.11
-0.24
-0.24
-0.20
-0.25
-0.49
-0.18
Relative
Humidity
0.24
0.44
0.22
0.20
-0.03
0.11
-0.37
-0.10
-0.35
-0.19
0.41
-0.25
0.00
-0.12
u-component of
wind speed
0.08
-0.01
-0.05
0.05
0.01
0.05
-0.25
0.10
-0.31
-0.16
0.11
-0.31
-0.16
-0.13
v-component of
wind speed
0.13
-0.11
0.16
0.14
0.57
0.40
0.36
0.19
0.35
-0.18
0.17
0.38
0.22
0.35

-------
Table ll-2c - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                  Elizabeth, New Jersey (ELNJ)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.01
-0.39
-0.31
-0.05
0.22
0.38
0.15
0.28
0.10
0.30
0.26
0.05
0.27
0.17
Average
Temperature
0.05
-0.32
-0.44
-0.15
0.05
0.36
0.00
0.23
-0.04
0.33
0.23
-0.10
0.22
004
Dew Point
Temperature
0.00
-0.45
-0.31
-0.01
0.19
0.46
0.16
0.22
0.11
0.36
0.34
0.06
0.28
0.19
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.02
-0.38
-0.39
-0.09
0.10
0.42
0.06
0.22
0.02
0.35
0.28
-0.04
0.26
0.10
Relative
Humidity
0.07
-0.22
0.22
0.39
0.10
0.36
0.38
-0.01
0.37
0.25
0.45
0.35
0.30
0.35
u-component of
wind speed
-0.03
0.10
0.09
0.28
-0.09
-0.14
0.24
-0.04
0.25
0.35
0.30
0.22
0.42
0.28
v-component of
wind speed
0.09
-0.12
0.23
0.45
0.19
0.17
0.42
0.08
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.37
0.51
0.41

-------
Table ll-2d - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                               New Brunswick, New Jersey (NBNJ)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.40
-0.42
-0.41
-0.29
0.42
0.46
0.28
0.46
0.30
0.57
0.31
0.32
-0.32
0.21
Average
Temperature
0.17
0.07
-0.15
-0.14
0.03
0.23
0.13
0.20
0.15
-0.11
0.27
0.13
-0.20
0.14
Dew Point
Temperature
0.31
-0.04
-0.19
-0.14
0.19
0.36
0.16
0.36
0.18
0.11
0.30
0.18
-0.18
0.16
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.20
0.03
-0.17
-0.14
0.07
0.26
0.13
0.25
0.14
-0.04
0.28
0.13
-0.19
0.13
Relative
Humidity
-0.09
0.47
0.42
0.33
-0.09
0.00
-0.31
-0.08
-0.32
-0.37
-0.10
-0.33
0.39
-0.24
u-component of
wind speed
0.10
0.25
0.00
-0.10
-0.08
-0.05
-0.31
0.23
-0.31
0.04
0.23
-0.32
-0.14
-0.33
v-component of
wind speed
0.39
-0.06
0.11
0.08
0.55
0.52
-0.06
0.50
-0.06
0.38
0.00
-0.02
0.26
-0.05

-------
Table 11-3. SVOC and Ozone Measured by the New Jersey Monitoring Stations
Monitoring
Station
CANJ
CHNJ
ELNJ
NBNJ
Average SVOC
Concentration
1 8 1.42 (±21. 87) //g
46.71 (±9.75) //g
6.01 (±0.20) //g
5. 48 (±0.09) //g
Average Ozone
Concentrations
from May-Aug
65.95 ppbv
64.16 ppbv
N/A
N/A
Total Number of
Ozone Sampling
Days
61
61
N/A
N/A
                                11-17

-------
Table 11-4. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for New Jersey
                             Monitoring Sites
Monitoring
Station
CANJ
CHNJ
ELNJ
NBNJ
Population
within Ten
Miles
2,113,778
239,072
2,093628
841,801
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
1,564,196
176,913
1,549,285
622,933
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
62,000
12,623
170,000
63,000
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
22.11(±5.24)ppbv
27.52(±8.71)ppbv
30.37 (±6.72) ppbv
48.16(±12.86)ppbv
                                  11-18

-------
12.0   Site in North Dakota
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
UATMP site in North Dakota (BUND).  This site is located in Beulah, and Figure 12-1 is a
topographical map showing the monitoring station in its urban location. Figure 12-2 is a map
identifying facilities within ten miles of the site and that reported to the 1999 NEI.  The BUND
site has very few industrial facilities nearby, mainly in the utility industries.  Hourly
meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at the Bismarck Municipal Airport (WBAN
24011) with the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air
concentration measurements.

       Table  12-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at the site, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days. Beulah is located to the
northwest of Bismarck, and Beulah's climate is continental in nature. This means that cold, dry
winters and generally mild summers are  normally expected. Moderate northerly winds are
expected, climatologically. This information can be found at the following web site:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/fargo.htm.

12.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the North Dakota Site
       Carbonyl compounds and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at the site,
as indicated in Tables 3-3 and  3-4. BUND's  lowest geometric mean was 1.31 ppbv for the
hydrocarbons, and the highest geometric mean was 2.91 ppbv for the halogenated hydrocarbons.
Polar and carbonyl compound values fell between these values.  The average total UATMP daily
concentration at BUND was 13.10 (±2.70) ppbv.  Table 12-1 also lists the averages for selected
meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time
period covered in this report.

       This site also opted to have total  and speciated nonmethane organic compounds
(SNMOC) measured during its air toxic  sampling.  SNMOC/NMOC compounds are of particular

                                          12-1

-------
interest because of their role in ozone formation. Readers are encouraged to review EPA's 2001
Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) and SpeciatedNonmethane Organic Compounds
(SNMOC) Monitoring Program, Final Report (EPA, 2002) for more information on
SNMOC/NMOC trends and concentrations. The average total NMOC value for BUND was 81
(±17.90) ppbC, of which nearly 76% could be identified through speciation. Of the speciated
compounds, ethane measured the highest concentration at the BUND site (6.69 ppbC). Typical
sources of ethane include production of insulating materials and cooking oils such as shortening.
Ozone concentrations were also sampled at BUND on 123 sample days, and were retrieved from
the U.S. EPA's AIRS database.  The average ozone concentration for each sample day was 46.00
ppbv. This information is available in Table 12-3.

       Tables 12-2 is the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of the
prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters. Identification of the prevalent
compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report.  The strongest (strong meaning a correlation
between 0.50 and 0.75 or -0.50 and -0.75) negative correlation at BUND was between acetylene
and maximum temperature, but acetylene also had moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -
0.25 and -0.50) negative correlations between average, dew point, and wet bulb temperatures as
well.  Benzene, ethylbenzene, w-,/>-xylene, o-xylene, and toluene demonstrated similar
moderately strong negative correlations with the four previously mentioned weather parameters.
The strongest positive correlation exists between formaldehyde and the same four weather
parameters. A similar positive, but not as strong, correlation exists with acetaldehyde, acetone,
chloromethane, and methylene chloride and the same temperature and moisture variables. The
compounds measured at BUND also tended to have a weak to moderately strong correlations
with the v-component of the wind, as all but one compound's correlation was positive (methyl
ethyl ketone).

12.2   Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 motor vehicles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information

                                         12-2

-------
on this ratio). The population near the BUND site is 6,204 people, all of whom are operating
approximately 4,591 motor vehicles.  This information is compared to the average daily
concentration of the prevalent compounds at the North Dakota site in Table 12-4. Also included
in Table 12-4 are average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars
passing the monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at the monitoring site. The BUND site's concentration ratios look somewhat different than those
of the roadside study.  The benzene-ethylbenzene and toluene-ethylbenzene ratios are
significantly higher than the roadside study's ratios for the same compounds, especially the
benzene-ethylbenzene ratio.  The benzene-ethylbenzene ratio is also significantly higher than the
w-,/»-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio, which is different than the roadside study's ratios.
                                           12-2

-------
             Figure 12-1. Beulah, North Dakota (BUND) Monitoring Station





                  -<
        ,

                                         V
                        ---,.1

                        ..

                             «
        I
              .  u
     ,   -
     >
              -    *
                  BUND
                      	' x

                      P     \
                                 X
              "•'
                               '
                                 r
         '
    %
                    k:
                   i
       R         I           :        1
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                         12-4

-------
                                       Figure 12-2. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of BUND
            Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of BUND
             • BUND Site
            Source Category (Number of Facilities)
            A Oil and Gas Extraction (3)
            B Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (6)
            C Unknown Industrial Classification (3)
to

-------
                      Table 12-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Site in North Dakota



Site
Name

BUND







Type

All
2001
sample
day

Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



13.10
(±2.70)

Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

59.31
(±2.49)
60.57
(±5.79)


Average
Temperature
(°F)

43.03
(±2.25)
43.27
(±5.36)

Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

33.77
(±1.94)
33.73
(±4.63)

Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

38.36
(±1.98)
38.48
(±4.74)

Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

64.28
(±1.25)
63.08
(±2.77)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-0.03
(±0.50)
-0.39
(±1.11)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-1.00
(±0.54)
-1.35
(±1.23)
to

-------
               Table 12-2. Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                Beulah, North Dakota (BUND)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.32
0.27
-0.52
-0.48
0.26
-0.24
-0.31
0.55
-0.30
-0.03
0.25
-0.29
-0.02
-0.31
Average
Temperature
0.35
0.27
-0.49
-0.43
0.30
-0.22
-0.31
0.56
-0.29
0.05
0.32
-0.28
0.03
-0.29
Dew Point
Temperature
0.33
0.21
-0.49
-0.44
0.28
-0.24
-0.31
0.55
-0.29
0.04
0.32
-0.28
0.01
-0.29
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.33
0.24
-0.50
-0.45
0.30
-0.23
-0.32
0.55
-0.29
0.05
0.31
-0.29
0.01
-0.30
Relative
Humidity
0.08
-0.02
0.05
0.12
0.09
-0.02
-0.06
-0.02
-0.05
0.17
-0.06
-0.05
-0.02
-0.04
u-component of
wind speed
-0.27
-0.12
-0.01
0.13
-0.12
-0.01
0.01
-0.28
0.00
0.14
-0.19
0.00
-0.08
0.00
v-component of
wind speed
0.34
0.23
0.06
0.04
0.17
0.09
0.07
0.41
0.09
-0.12
0.05
0.09
0.13
0.08
to

-------
                       Table 12-3. TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Beulah, ND (BUND) Monitoring Station

Average Ozone
Concentrations
from May-Aug
46.00 ppbv
Total
Number of
Ozone
Sampling
Days
123

Average
TNMOC
(speciated)
61 (±17.63)
ppbC

Average
TNMOC (w/
unknowns)
81 (±17.90)
ppbC

% TNMOC
Identified
76%
SNMOC
Compound
with the
Highest
Concentration
Ethane (6.69
ppbC)

Typical Emission
Sources
Production of insulating
materials; cooking oils
such as shortening
to
oo

-------
Table 12-4.  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for the North Dakota
                                Monitoring Site


Monitoring
Station
BUND

Population
within Ten
Miles
6,204
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
4,591


Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
1,350

Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
13.10(±2.70)ppbv
                                      12-9

-------
13.0   Sites in Puerto Rico
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
two UATMP sites in Puerto Rico (BAPR and SJPR). These sites reside along Puerto Rico's
northern coastline, with SJPR in San Juan and BAPR further west in Barceloneta. No
topographical maps are available for these sites, but Figures 13-1 through 13-2 are maps
identifying facilities within ten miles of the sites that reported to the 1999 NEI. There are a
number of chemical industrial facilities just to the east of BAPR. SJPR has nearly as many
facilities nearby but they are more scattered around the monitoring site.  Hourly meteorological
data were retrieved for all of 2001 at the San Juan weather station (WBAN 11641) with the
purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air concentration
measurements.

       Table 13-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each of these sites, along
with temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature,
average wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u-
and v- components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days. Puerto Rico is located
in the northern Caribbean and experiences a tropical climate, where the air is warm and humid
year-round (as Table 13-1 confirms). Breezy winds flow from the northeast to the east on
average with the aid of the sub-tropical high pressure that resides over the tropical Atlantic.

13.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Puerto Rico Sites
       Carbonyl compounds  and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at the two
Puerto Rican sites, as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4. There was a considerable difference in the
geometric means of the two sites for all compound types, with the exception of hydrocarbons,
where the values were closer together, as Table 3-4 demonstrates.  The largest difference was
between the polar compounds, where BAPR's geometric mean was 9.19 ppbv vs. SJPR's mean
of 3.06 ppbv. The average total UATMP daily concentration at the two sites also demonstrated
this large difference in the sampled compounds. BAPR's average concentration was 50.30
(±18.17) ppbv while SJPR's was less than half of that (18.59 ±4.82 ppbv). Table 13-1 also lists
                                          13-1

-------
the averages for selected meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which
is similar to the time period covered in this report.

       These sites also opted to have total and SNMOC sampled during its air toxic sampling.
SNMOC/NMOC compounds are of particular interest because of their role in ozone formation.
Readers are encouraged to review EPA's 2001 Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) and
Speciated Nonmethane Organic Compounds (SNMOC) Monitoring Program, Final Report
(EPA, 2002) for more information on SNMOC/NMOC trends and concentrations.  The average
total NMOC value for BAPR was 436 (±81.85) ppbC, of which nearly 38% could be identified
through speciation, and the average total NMOC value for SJPR was 371 (±77.84) ppbC, of
which nearly 60% could be identified through speciation. Of the speciated compounds, toluene
and isopentane measured the highest concentrations at the BAPR and SJPR sites (20.52 ppbC
and 24.78 ppbC, respectively). Typical sources of toluene  include motor vehicle exhaust,
volatilization of toluene-based solvents and thinners, production of benzene and urethane.
Sources of isopentane include non-wood upolstered office side and arm chairs. This information
is given in Table 13-3. Unfortunately, ozone concentrations were not sampled at these sites.

       Tables 13-2a-b are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of
the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site.  Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report.  A number of the compounds had
moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and -0.50) to strong (between 0.50 and 0.75 or
-0.50 and -0.75) positive correlations with a majority of the weather parameters at the BAPR site.
However, the strongest positive correlations were between acetylene, benzene, and propylene
with the v-component of the wind.  This wind component trend was also evident at the SJPR site.
However, a moderately strong to strong correlation was computed between almost all of the
compounds and both wind components. But the carbonyls demonstrated a positive correlation
while the VOC demonstrated a negative correlation. The computed correlations for the
remaining weather parameters and the compounds at SJPR were generally weak. Wind speed
and direction obviously have some effect on the concentration of the prevalent compounds
at the Puerto Rican monitoring locations.

                                         13-2

-------
13.2   Spatial Analysis
       Data used to estimate of the number of motor vehicles operating in proximity to the
monitoring stations were not available for the Puerto Rico sites.  However, the average daily
traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of motor vehicles passing the monitoring
sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis was available.  This information is
compared to the average daily concentration of the prevalent compounds at the Puerto Rico  sites
in Table 13-4. As evident in Table 13-4, the San Juan site has significantly more nearby traffic
than the Barceloneta site.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and  compares them to the concentration ratios
at the monitoring site. Overall, the two Puerto Rico sites' concentration ratios resemble those of
the roadside study.  However, the benzene-ethylbenzene concentration ratio is significantly lower
at both BAPR and SJPR than at the roadside study.  Also, the toluene-ethylbenzene ratio is lower
at these two sites than the roadside study, but less so than the benzene-ethylbenzene
concentration ratio.
                                          1O "
                                          13-j

-------
                             Figure 13-1.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of BAPR
Facilties Located Within 10 Miles of BAPR

• BAPR Site

Source Category (Number of Facilities)

A Chemicals and Allied Products (13)
Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
d splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parentheses above
                                             Puerto Rico
                                                                                                      3  4 Miles
                                                                                                      j	i

-------
                              Figure 13-2.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SJPR
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SJPR
 •  SJPR Site
Source Category (Number of Facilties)
A Chemicals and A lied Products (3)
B Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (2)
C P rim ary M etal I ndustries (1)
D Electric, Gas, aid Sanitary Services (2)
E Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (2)
Puerto Rico
                                                                              BD
                                                                               D
                                                                                      C
                                                                                       A

-------
Table 13-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Puerto Rico
Site
Name

BAPR


SJPR


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



50.30
(±18.17)


18.59
(±4.82)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

86.60
(±0.33)
88.05
(±0.92)
86.60
(±0.33)
88.05
(±0.92)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

70.72
(±1.16)
68.00
(±4.11)
70.72
(±1.16)
68.00
(±4.11)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

63.60
(±1.00)
61.61
(±3.45)
63.60
(±1.00)
61.61
(±3.45)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

65.84
(±1.05)
63.57
(±3.63)
65.84
(±1.05)
63.57
(±3.63)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

68.06
(±1.02)
65.51
(±3.53)
68.06
(±1.02)
65.51
(±3.53)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-5.56
(±0.29)
-4.55
(±1.34)
-5.56
(±0.29)
-4.55
(±1.34)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-0.80
(±0.25)
-0.47
(±0.65)
-0.80
(±0.25)
-0.47
(±0.65)

-------
Table 13-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                 Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (BAPR)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.32
0.31
0.10
-0.09
-0.40
-0.18
0.28
0.28
0.23
-0.17
-0.14
0.26
0.03
0.46
Average
Temperature
0.13
0.13
0.34
0.15
-0.25
-0.07
0.47
0.26
0.45
-0.17
-0.01
0.42
0.36
0.48
Dew Point
Temperature
0.07
0.08
0.38
0.17
-0.19
-0.05
0.45
0.20
0.43
-0.14
0.05
0.40
0.41
0.41
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.09
0.10
0.37
0.16
-0.22
-0.06
0.46
0.23
0.44
-0.16
0.03
0.41
0.39
0.44
Relative
Humidity
-0.02
0.02
0.48
0.24
-0.03
-0.04
0.34
0.07
0.33
-0.08
0.11
0.31
0.48
0.24
u-component of
wind speed
0.40
0.27
0.47
0.41
0.19
-0.50
-0.05
-0.13
-0.13
-0.24
-0.16
0.07
0.28
0.22
v-component of
wind speed
0.48
0.25
0.74
0.52
0.07
-0.24
0.21
0.12
0.15
-0.16
0.03
0.26
0.59
0.46

-------
               Table 13-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                 San Juan, Puerto Rico (SJPR)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.15
0.29
0.29
-0.13
-0.15
-0.51
0.02
-0.01
0.00
-0.08
0.20
0.01
-0.08
0.01
Average
Temperature
0.16
0.22
0.11
-0.06
-0.02
-0.01
0.25
-0.05
0.23
0.00
0.43
0.24
-0.11
0.21
Dew Point
Temperature
0.15
0.18
0.07
-0.01
-0.04
0.07
0.24
-0.04
0.22
-0.03
0.39
0.24
-0.05
0.20
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.16
0.20
0.08
-0.04
-0.03
0.03
0.24
-0.04
0.22
-0.02
0.41
0.24
-0.08
0.20
Relative
Humidity
0.18
0.16
-0.05
0.02
-0.08
0.22
0.15
0.04
0.13
-0.10
0.25
0.15
0.01
0.12
u-component of
wind speed
0.55
0.43
-0.23
-0.30
-0.60
-0.51
-0.66
0.47
-0.67
-0.74
-0.11
-0.65
-0.03
-0.60
v-component of
wind speed
0.55
0.45
-0.01
-0.22
-0.44
-0.30
-0.31
0.28
-0.33
-0.49
0.30
-0.31
-0.02
-0.25
oo

-------
Table 13-3. TNMOC Measured by the Puerto Rico Monitoring Stations
Monitoring
Station
BAPR
SJPR
Average TNMOC
(speciated)
167 (±29.90) ppbC
222 (±30.94) ppbC
Average TNMOC
(w/ unknowns)
436 (±81. 85)
ppbC
371 (±77.84)
ppbC
% TNMOC
Identified
38%
60%
SNMOC
Compound with
the Highest
Concentration
Toluene (20.52
ppbC)
Isopentane (24.78
ppbC)
Typical Emission Sources
Motor vehicle exhaust;
volatilization of toluene-based
solvents and thinners; used to
make benzene and urethane
Non-wood upholstered office side
and arm chairs

-------
     Table 13-4.  Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Puerto Rico
                                    Monitoring Sites

Monitoring
Station
BAPR
SJPR

County
Population"
26,644
436,334
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
N/A
N/A

Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
10
51,000

Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
50.30(±18.17)ppbv
18.59(±4.82)ppbv
County population data available for 1997 at the Census Bureau web site http://blue.census.gov/
                                          13-10

-------
14.0   Site in South Dakota
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
UATMP site in South Dakota (SFSD).  This site resides in Sioux Falls, situated in southeastern
South Dakota. Figure 14-1 is a topographical map showing the monitoring station is its urban
location. Figure 14-2 is a map identifying facilities within ten miles of the site that reported to
the 1999 NEI.  The map shows that there are very few industrial facilities near the monitoring
site, mostly to the northwest. Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of 2001 at the
Sioux Falls weather station (WBAN 14944) near the site with the purpose of calculating
correlations of meteorological data with ambient air concentration measurements.

       Table 14-1 highlights the UATMP average concentration at each site, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and on sampling days.  The Sioux Falls area has  a
continental climate, with cold winters, warm summers, with often drastic day to day variations.
Precipitation varies throughout the year, but is typically sufficient for the springtime growing
season.  On average, winds come from the south-southeast and are relatively light. This
information can be found at the following web  site:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/sioux.htm.

14.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the South Dakota Site
       Carbonyl compounds were not measured at this site, as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4.
The highest computed geometric mean belonged to the halogenated hydrocarbons (3.51 ppbv).
The polar compounds had the lowest geometric mean, with a value of 1.45 ppbv, and the
hydrocarbons' geometric mean fell in between with a value of 2.58 ppbv. The average total
UATMP daily concentration at SFSD was 41.61 (±62.70) ppbv.  Table 14-1 also lists the
averages for selected meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is
similar to the time period covered in this report. This site also opted to have total and speciated
nonmethane organic compounds (SNMOC) sampled during its air toxic sampling.
SNMOC/NMOC compounds are of particular interest because  of their role in ozone formation.

                                          14-1

-------
Readers are encouraged to review EPA's 2001 Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) and
Speciated Nonmethane Organic Compounds (SNMOC) Monitoring Program, Final Report
(EPA, 2002) for more information on SNMOC/NMOC trends and concentrations. The average
total NMOC value for SFSD was  153 (±28.37) ppbC, of which nearly 61% could be identified
through speciation. Of the speciated compounds, isopentane measured the highest concentration
at the SFSD site (9.01 ppbC). Typical sources of isopentane are non-wood upholstered office
side and arm chairs.  This information is given in Table 14-3. Ozone concentrations were also
sampled at this site on 31 sample days, and were retrieved from the U.S. EPA's AIRS database.
The average ozone concentration for each sample day was 50.84 ppbv.

       Table 14-2 is the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of the
prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters.  Identification of the prevalent
compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. The strongest (strong meaning a correlation
between 0.50 and 0.75 or -0.50 and -0.75) correlations at the SFSD site were between acetylene
and maximum and average temperature and dew point and wet bulb temperature, and they were
all negative.  As these parameters increased, concentrations  tended to decrease. On the other
hand, moderately strong positive correlations were computed between chloromethane and the
same four weather parameters. Thus, for chloromethane, as temperature and moisture increased,
concentrations tended to increase as well.  The remainder of the correlations were weak (between
0 and 0.25 or 0 and -0.25) and fluctuated between negative and positive.

14.2   Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of cars
operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in this report
is 0.74 automobiles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information on this ratio).
The population near the SFSD site is 148,462 people, all of whom are operating approximately
109,862 vehicles. This information  is  compared to the average daily concentration of the
prevalent compounds at the South Dakota site in Table 14-3. Also included in  Table 14-3 are
average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars passing the
monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

                                         14-2

-------
       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites. Both the benzene-ethylbenzene and toluene-ethylbenzene
concentration ratios were higher than those of the roadside study, while both m-,p-xy\ene-
ethylbenzene and o-xylene-ethylbenzene were slightly lower at the site vs the roadside study.
Another difference between the site and the study is that the site's benzene-ethylbenzene ratio is
higher than the w-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio, whereas the roadside study's m-,p-xy\ene-
ethylbenzene ratio is higher.
                                           14-2

-------
            Figure 14-1. Sioux Falls, South Dakota (SFSD) Monitoring Station
                 <};"^^B
          11"

                             .
                   '•;5V   I   .
                  "*'••• '.  •- -ii   ,-.ii-i' '* ^— "^ay
                                         L-; ->f BU..I ..• ••  • •      : _.y
                                         tr=r_^J"              i -Jr.
                                              T'-^Ar'        - ;
                                _,
                                 KT  ."   •
                                •.. '• r    "SSSS-Xs
'  .       ^  :


'
                                                      i^^   -   .	-rr.-!'"
                                                     S   it--,  .      :;  i
                                                               .;.  .:;  :



Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series.  Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                           14-4

-------
                              Figure 14-2.  Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SFSD
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SFSD

SFSD Site   •
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Lum toer and Wood P roducts, E xcept F umiture (1)
B Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (2)
C Fabricated Metal Prod., Excpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (1)
D Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (3)

-------
Table 14-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for the Site in South Dakota



Site
Name

SFSD







Type

All
2001
sample
day

Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



41.61
(±62.70)

Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

59.34
(±2.45)
60.95
(±6.11)


Average
Temperature
(°F)

43.44
(±2.33)
44.12
(±5.68)

Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

35.04
(±2.00)
35.55
(±4.92)

Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

39.11
(±2.06)
39.67
(±5.04)

Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

63.50
(±1.26)
63.66
(±2.63)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-0.08
(±0.55)
-0.28
(±1.23)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

0.19
(±0.68)
1.60
(±1.43)

-------
Table 14-2 - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                Sioux Falls, South Dakota (SFSD)
Compound
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
-0.48
-0.03
0.40
0.01
-0.03
0.00
-0.03
0.16
0.01
0.07
-0.02
Average
Temperature
-0.57
-0.13
0.35
-0.08
-0.13
-0.11
-0.04
0.09
-0.10
-0.11
-0.11
Dew Point
Temperature
-0.56
-0.09
0.37
-0.04
-0.10
-0.08
-0.02
0.04
-0.07
-0.13
-0.07
Wet Bulb
Temperature
-0.57
-0.11
0.37
-0.06
-0.12
-0.10
-0.04
0.07
-0.09
-0.12
-0.09
Relative
Humidity
0.05
-0.14
-0.01
-0.18
-0.20
-0.19
0.00
-0.30
-0.21
-0.31
-0.17
u-component of
wind speed
0.18
0.00
-0.21
-0.03
0.04
0.04
-0.06
0.11
0.03
0.07
-0.01
v-component of
wind speed
-0.27
-0.01
0.15
0.04
-0.03
-0.04
-0.08
0.02
-0.03
-0.10
0.04

-------
                      Table 14-3. TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Sioux Falls, SD (SFSD) Monitoring Station

Average Ozone
Concentrations
from May-Aug
50.84ppbv
Total
Number of
Ozone
Sampling
Days
31

Average
TNMOC
(speciated)
93 (±20.38)
ppbC

Average
TNMOC (w/
unknowns)
153 (±28.37)
ppbC

% TNMOC
Identified
61 %
SNMOC
Compound
with the
Highest
Concentration
Isopentane (9.01
ppbC)

Typical Emission
Sources
Non-wood upholstered
office side and arms
chairs
oo

-------
Table 14-4. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for the South Dakota
                                Monitoring Site
Monitoring
Station
SFSD
Population
within Ten
Miles
148,462
Estimated
Number of
Vehicles Owned
109,862
Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
4,320
Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
41.61 (±62.70) ppbv
                                     14-9

-------
15.0   Sites in Texas
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
two UATMP sites in Texas (A2TX and EPTX). A2TX is located in Arlington, just outside of
Dallas, and EPTX is located in El Paso, at the westernmost point of the Texas panhandle.
Figures 15-1 through 15-2 are topographical maps showing the monitoring stations in their urban
locations. Figures  15-3 and 15-4  are maps identifying facilities  within ten miles of the sites that
reported to the 1999 NEI. Numerous industrial facilities of a variety of types surround the A2TX
station, with the majority to the north of the station.  The industry with the largest number of
facilities near the A2TX site is transportation equipment.  EPTX has considerably fewer
industrial sites, but again the majority of them are to the north of the monitoring site.  However,
this scenerio may be explained because to the south of the site is Mexico, which the NEI does not
cover.  Petroleum refining has the largest number of facilities in  the area. Hourly meteorological
data were retrieved for all of 2001 at two weather stations near these sites with the purpose of
calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air concentration measurements.
The two weather stations are Dallas-Ft. Worth and El Paso International Airport (WBAN 3927
and 23044, respectively).

       Table 15-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each site, along with
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire  year and on sampling days.  The Dallas climate is
classified as humid subtropical and temperatures can be extremely hot in the summer and mild in
the winter.  The area is humid, but usually less than its neighbors closer to the Gulf of Mexico.
Winds can be breezy and tend to flow from the southeast on average. El Paso, on the other hand,
is warm and very dry, as its location is  on the edge of the Franklin Mountains in the Chihuahuan
Desert and tends to dry out any moist air masses as they move from west to east. Winds in El
Paso flow out of the southwest on average, only adding to the dry tendency. This information
can be found at the following web sites:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/dallas.htm.
http://www.desertusa.com/Cities/tx/tx  elpaso.html and  http://www.ci.el-paso.tx.us.
                                          15-1

-------
15.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Texas Sites
       Carbonyl compounds and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at the two
sites, as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4.  A2TX reported higher geometric means for carbonyl
and halogenated hydrocarbons than EPTX (4.15 ppbv and 3.33 ppbv vs. 2.31 ppbv and 3.30
ppbv, respectively), but EPTX had higher hydrocarbon and polar compound geometric means
than A2TX (7.53 ppbv and 2.72 ppbv vs. 4.41 ppbv and 2.31 ppbv, respectively). The average
total UATMP daily concentrations at the two sites were very similar (29.43 ±13.35 ppbv at
A2TX and 29.25 ±11.52 ppbv at EPTX). Table 15-1 also lists the averages for selected
meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time
period covered in this report.

       Tables 15-2a-b are the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients  for each of
the prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters by site.  Identification of the
prevalent compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report.  A2TX had the highest correlations
computed across all of the UATMP sites.  Chloromethane had very strong (between  0.75 and 1
or -0.75 and -1) positive correlations with maximum and average temperature and dew point and
wet bulb temperature (0.84, 0.81, 0.89, and 0.85).  Formaldehyde had strong (between  0.50 and
0.75 or -0.50 and -0.75) positive correlations with the same four weather parameters (0.61, 0.64,
0.63, and 0.62). Other compounds had similar positive correlations, but were not nearly as
strong. These compounds are acetylene, dichlorodifluoromethane, methyl ethyl ketone, and
methylene chloride.  All but two compounds (acetone and acetylene) had weak to strong negative
correlations with the u-component of the wind.

       At EPTX, acetone demonstrated a moderately strong (between 0.25 and 0.50 or -0.25 and
-0.50) to strong negative correlation with maximum and average temperature and dew  point and
wet bulb temperature, and acetylene showed a similar correlation to the same four parameters.
On the other hand, chloromethane demonstrated a moderately strong to strong positive
correlation with the previously mentioned parameters.  All compounds showed a weak to
moderately strong negative correlation with the u-component of the wind, while all but one
(methyl ethyl ketone) showed a weak (between 0 and 0.25 or 0 and -0.25) to moderately strong

                                         15-2

-------
positive correlation with the v-component of the wind. The temperature, moisture, and wind
parameters tend to factor into the average concentrations of the compounds, but in varying ways
and degrees.

15.2   Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity to the monitoring station can be established.  The ratio used in
this report is 0.74  motor vehicles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information
on this ratio). The population near the A2TX site is 721,819 people, all of whom are operating
approximately 534,416 motor vehicles. EPTX has a population of 423,488 people driving
313,381 automobiles.  This information is compared to the average daily concentration of the
prevalent compounds at each Texas site in Table 15-3. Also included in Table 15-3 are average
daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars passing the monitoring sites on
the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites. The EPTX site's concentration ratios look very similar to the
roadside study's, with one exception: the benzene-ethylbenzene ratio is slightly higher than the
m-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio, whereas the roadside study had a higher ratio for the m-,p-
xylene-ethylbenzene. The A2TX site also had a higher benzene-ethylbenzene ratio than m-,p-
xylene-ethylbenzene. The ratios were also higher at the A2TX site for benzene-ethylbenzene and
toluene-ethylbenzene than for the same compounds for the roadside study.
                                          15-2

-------
          Figure 15-1. Arlington, Texas (A2TX) Monitoring Station
             ^^5      .«
                          V
                           BJ  J  t
/J,C   CA&iJ—, -
             '"     ^vT
                     rfi^
  I—--.    -_     ^


  F   '\    I'
  «• JJL._L—i""

   liBWW*1- -"«



  ..A ££-r
  >«-J
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                            15-4

-------
                Figure 15-2.  El Paso, Texas (EPTX) Monitoring Station
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                       15-5

-------
Figure 15-3. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of A2TX
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of A2TX
• A2TX Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Furniture and Fixtures (9)
B Paper and AN led Products (1)
C Printing, Publishing, and A1 lied Industries (25)
D Chemicals and Allied Products (21 )
= Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Products (20)
F Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products (6)
G Primary Metal Industries (2)
H Fabricated Metal Prod., Excpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (21 )
I Industrial andCommercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (2)
J Electronic a Other Elec. Equip, a Comps., Excpt. Comp. Equip. (7)
< Transportation Equipment (76)
L Meas., Anlyzg., a Cntrllg. Instrs.; Photo., Med. a Opt. Gds.; Clcks (1 )
M Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (2)
N Pipelines, Except Natu-al Gas (1 2)
P Wholesale Trade-durable Goods (7)
Q Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (40)
R RealE state (1)
S Business Services (2)
T Autom otive R epair , Services , and P arki ng (1 )
U Miscellaneous Repair Services (1)
V Unknown Industrial Classification (2)











Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
displayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above.
PL_
• 1
v. 3
\s
Texas










/
'








\











/^
,/
/ R H
/£ H

/ E D D
/
/



On
^'ij
O °




F
F
	 H 	
G
\ F F




1~ ^\








^ — BT"
^^""^ J
KK
CCD n Q
K C NQ Q
w c F n
K E c NN Qu
K
E
Q


V

cc
c c

S


H
C H
E J „
M
M
F
D DHH
H
U
\_ D








~~---___^^
^_^ 	 H[-j ^"^^
H H "\


L
D
P I D
K D
E ED
H HD
Ulf KH H D
K .f ~G H
K K c
K K
K I
AC
A A

K K
K







__^-^
0123
I I I I








v
N.
\^
NV
\
\
\
T \
p \

\
K \
\
I





	 L

1
/
/
/ \
/ *

Miles








































-------
Figure 15-4. Facilities Located Within 10 Mile of EPTX
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of EPTX
EPTX Site •
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Metal Mining (2)
B Furniture and Fixtures (1 )
C Chemical sand Allied Products (5)
D Petroleum Refining and Related Industries (79)
E Rubber end Miscellaneous Plastics Products (1)
F Leather and Leather Products (9)
G Primary Metal Industries (29)
H F abricated Metal P rod ., E xcpt . Machinery and Trans . E quip . (1 7)
I E lectronic & Other Elec. Equip. £ C omps . , E xcpt . C om p . E quip . (3)
J Meas., AnlyTg., & Cntrllg. Instrs.; P hoto., Med. & Opt. Gds., Clcks (1
K Pipelines, Except Natural Gas (4)
L E lectric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (4)
M Wholesale Trade-durable Goods (1 )
N Wholesale Trade-non-durable Goods (42)
O Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations (1 )
P National Security and International Affairs (5)
Q Unknown Industrial Classification (4)
Note: Due to facility density and colocati on, the total facilities
displayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above
_T~n

-------
                         Table 15-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for Sites in Texas
Site
Name

A2TX


EPTX


Type

All
2001
sample
day
All
2001
sample
day
Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



29.43
(±13.35)


29.25
(±11.52)
Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

76.84
(±1.64)
68.33
(±8.22)
80.01
(±1.54)
79.72
(±5.76)
Average
Temperature
(°F)

61.31
(±1.84)
54.99
(±9.07)
65.97
(±1.53)
65.33
(±5.31)
Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

51.00
(±1.53)
45.85
(±8.12)
36.19
(±1.42)
35.90
(±5.06)
Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

55.10
(±1.55)
49.92
(±8.11)
50.39
(±1.12)
50.01
(±3.95)
Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

63.36
(±1.10)
66.66
(±6.07)
36.48
(±1.49)
36.13
(±4.78)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-1.15
(±0.32)
0.21
(±2.18)
0.89
(±0.57)
0.93
(±1.70)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

3.01
(±0.71)
0.61
(±3.68)
0.49
(±0.34)
0.76
(±1.11)
oo

-------
Table 15-2a - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                    Arlington, Texas (A2TX)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.08
-0.16
-0.42
-0.08
0.84
0.36
0.03
0.61
0.03
0.21
0.54
0.02
-0.14
0.08
Average
Temperature
0.09
-0.12
-0.33
-0.10
0.81
0.34
0.02
0.64
0.05
0.34
0.51
0.03
-0.18
-0.07
Dew Point
Temperature
0.02
-0.30
-0.38
-0.06
0.89
0.23
-0.07
0.62
-0.06
0.28
0.46
-0.07
-0.19
-0.23
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.08
-0.19
-0.35
-0.08
0.85
0.30
-0.02
0.62
0.00
0.33
0.48
-0.01
-0.19
-0.15
Relative
Humidity
0.15
-0.23
0.12
0.25
0.25
-0.09
-0.05
0.02
-0.05
0.28
-0.05
-0.06
0.01
-0.55
u-component of
wind speed
-0.06
0.37
0.15
-0.29
-0.60
-0.10
-0.05
-0.10
-0.01
-0.08
-0.32
-0.01
-0.15
0.41
v-component of
wind speed
-0.22
-0.37
-0.42
0.00
0.54
0.06
-0.12
0.28
-0.17
-0.12
0.31
-0.16
0.03
0.14

-------
Table 15-2b - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                     El Paso, Texas (EPTX)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.04
-0.23
-0.38
-0.02
0.45
0.00
0.10
0.02
0.09
-0.17
0.04
0.10
-0.11
0.17
Average
Temperature
0.03
-0.26
-0.34
0.05
0.49
0.04
0.17
0.01
0.16
-0.12
0.13
0.17
-0.06
0.24
Dew Point
Temperature
0.06
-0.59
-0.39
-0.14
0.41
-0.09
0.04
-0.08
0.02
-0.10
0.16
0.02
-0.25
0.15
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.07
-0.42
-0.40
-0.03
0.51
-0.01
0.12
-0.03
0.11
-0.12
0.16
0.12
-0.15
0.21
Relative
Humidity
0.07
-0.39
-0.03
-0.21
-0.16
-0.19
-0.14
-0.16
-0.17
0.05
0.09
-0.17
-0.21
-0.09
u-component of
wind speed
-0.13
-0.21
-0.18
-0.25
-0.14
-0.14
-0.22
-0.35
-0.22
-0.06
-0.12
-0.22
-0.23
-0.14
v-component of
wind speed
0.04
0.01
0.18
0.27
0.13
0.10
0.27
0.23
0.29
-0.14
0.12
0.30
0.20
0.22

-------
Table 15-3. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for Texas Monitoring Sites


Monitoring
Station
A2TX
EPTX

Population
within Ten
Miles
721,819
423,488
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
534,416
313,381


Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
17,472
3,790

Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
29.43 (±13.35)ppbv
29.25(±11.52)ppbv
                                        15-11

-------
16.0   Site in Utah
       This section focuses on a few specific meteorological and concentration trends for the
UATMP site in Utah (SLCU), which resides in Salt Lake City, in north central Utah. Figure 16-1
is a topographical map showing the monitoring station in its urban location. Figure 16-2 is a map
identifying facilities within ten miles of the site that reported to the 1999 NEI. The map shows
that there are numerous industrial facilities, of a variety of types, near the monitoring site, and
most of them are to the northeast and east. Hourly meteorological data were retrieved for all of
2001 at Salt Lake City International Airport's weather station (WBAN 24124) near the site with
the purpose of calculating correlations of meteorological data with ambient air concentration
measurements.

       Table  16-1 highlights the average UATMP concentration at each site, along with the
temperature (average maximum and average), moisture (average dew point temperature, average
wet-bulb temperature, and average relative humidity), and wind information (average u- and v-
components of the wind) for the entire year and  on sampling days.  The Salt Lake City area has a
semi-arid continental climate, with large seasonal variations. The area is dry, located on the west
side of the Wasatch Mountains, and the Great Salt Lake tends to have a moderating influence on
the city's temperature. Moderate winds flow out of the southeast on average.  This information
can be found at the following web site:
http://www.ssec.org/idis/gates/States/physical/saltlak.htm.

16.1   Meteorological and Concentration Averages at the Utah Site
       Carbonyl compounds and VOC (volatile organic compounds) were measured at this site,
as indicated in Tables 3-3 and 3-4. The highest  computed geometric  mean belonged to the
hydrocarbons (8.57 ppbv). The polar compounds had the lowest geometric mean, with a value of
2.16 ppbv, and the carbonyls and halogenated hydrocarbons' geometric means fell in between
with values of 5.57 ppbv and 3.22 ppbv, respectively.  The average total UATMP daily
concentration at SLCU was 32.27 (±7.16) ppbv. Table 16-1 also lists the averages for selected
meteorological parameters from January 2001 to December 2001, which is similar to the time
period covered in this report.  This site also opted to have total and speciated nonmethane

                                          16-1

-------
organic compounds (SNMOC) sampled during its air toxic sampling.  SNMOC/NMOC
compounds are of particular interest because of their role in ozone formation.  Readers are
encouraged to review EPA's 2001 Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) and Speciated
Nonmethane Organic Compounds (SNMOC) Monitoring Program, Final Report (EPA, 2002) for
more information on SNMOC/NMOC trends and concentrations. The average total NMOC
value for SLCU was 306 (±104.05) ppbC, of which nearly 62% could be identified through
speciation.  Of the speciated compounds, isopentane measured the highest concentration at the
SLCU (16.20 ppbC).  Typical sources of isopentane are non-wood upholstered office side and
arm chairs. This information is given in Table 16-3.  Ozone concentrations were also sampled at
this site on 123 sample days, and were retrieved from the U.S. EPA's AIRS database.  The
average ozone concentration for each sample day was 68 ppbv.

       Table 16-2 is the summary of calculated Pearson Correlation coefficients for each of the
prevalent compounds and selected meteorological parameters. Identification of the prevalent
compounds is discussed in Section 3 of this report. Acetylene had strong (between 0.50 and  0.75
or -0.50 and -0.75) negative correlations with maximum and average temperature and dew point
and wet bulb temperature, and a strong positive correlation with relative humidity. Propylene
had similar correlations, but somewhat weaker. Chloromethane, on the other hand, had the exact
opposite correlations, having strong positive correlations with the maximum and average
temperature and dew point and wet bulb temperature, and a moderately strong (between 0.25 and
0.50 or -0.25 and -0.50) negative correlation with relative humidity. The carbonyl compounds
had moderately strong negative  correlations with the v-component of the wind. The remainder of
the computed correlations were generally weak (between 0 and 0.25 or 0 and -0.25).

16.2   Spatial Analysis
       Using the population within ten miles of each site, an estimate of the number of motor
vehicles operating in proximity  to the monitoring station can be established. The ratio used in
this report is 0.74 motor vehicles to every one person (refer to section 3.4.1 for more information
on this ratio). The population near the SLCU site is 819,703 people, all of whom are operating
approximately 606,580 motor vehicles. This information is compared to the average daily

                                          16-2

-------
concentration of the prevalent compounds at the Utah site in Table 16-4. Also included in Table
16-4 are average daily traffic data, or more specifically, the average number of cars passing the
monitoring sites on the nearest roadway to each site on a daily basis.

       A roadside study conducted to measure emissions from motor vehicles determined that
the concentration ratios of the BTEX compounds were relatively consistent from urban area to
urban area. (For more information on this study, refer to section 3.4.2.) Figure 3-16 depicts the
average concentration ratios of the roadside study and compares them to the concentration ratios
at each of the monitoring sites. The SLCU site's concentration ratio for benzene-ethylbenzene
ratio is higher than the m-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene ratio, whereas the roadside study had a higher
ratio for the m-,/>-xylene-ethylbenzene.  The toluene-ethylbenzene concentration ratio is
somewhat higher than that of the roadside study. The other two ratios, w-,/?-xylene-ethylbenzene
and o-xylene-ethylbenzene, look very similar to the roadside study's ratios for the same
compounds.
                                           16-2

-------
             Figure 16-1. Salt Lake City, Utah (SLCU) Monitoring Station
                                          =
                                                      --
                                                         WEST VALLEY CITY
                                                                 •••L  -1   f
                                                                 I
                                                                  -
                                                              ^
                                                          IfT  I
                                                          :-*> - -
^^••n-.T-rti
i    I   h
                                                              i      i   */
                                                         t     I  ^;
                                                         Tt        , ..
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Series. Map Scale: 1:24,000.
                                     16-4

-------
Figure 16-2. Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SLCU
Facilities Located Within 10 Miles of SLCU
• SLCU Site
Source Category (Number of Facilities)
A Bldng. Constrc., General Contractors and Operative Builders (1 )
B Food and Kindred Products (1 )
C Lumber and Wood Products, Escept Furniture (2)
D Furniture and Fixtures (1)
E Printing, Publishing, and Allied Industries (1)
F Chemicals and Allied Products (6)
G P etnol eum R efini ng and R elated I ndustries (9)
H Rubber and Miscellaneous P lastics Products (7)
I Stcne , C lay , G lass , and C oncrete P noducts (S)
J Primary Metal Industries (E)
K Fabricated Metal Prod, EMCpt. Machinery and Trans. Equip. (9)
L Industrial and Commercial Machinery and Computer Equipment (E)
M Electronics Other Elec. Equip. 3 Comps., Excpt. Comp. EqUp. (5)
N Transportation Equipment (5)
0 Meas., Anlyzg., 3 Cntrl. Instrs; Photo., Med. & Opt. Gds.; Clocks (41
P Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (1)
Q Transportation by Air (1)
R Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services (15)
S Wholesale T rade-durable G oods (1 )
T Health Services (1)
U Educational Services (1)
V Administration of Human Resource Programs (1 )
W National Security and International Affairs (1)
X Unknown Industrial Classification (2)









Note: Due to facility density and colocation, the total facilities
d splayed may not equal the number of facilities in parantheses above





*


utan



































/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
	 /
7
/
i


j



\
\
\
\
\
\,
\








^ — -~
^f —
^
,s



M
n
M




R




A
J


NF
N



1
L
BD
X. R







R-~-~
GK







i

K
E "II
S
J F °
J


Q
• X






X
JJ
M










G"~~~~-_
Xfs



G
G


R i . .
R LK
K
L
C
N

M
R

H H
HH
H K N
0 IR
W|R

C
R
G
M
/
0123
I I I I



















^r
\
\
\




i
j



.
N
IN
4 Miles
1



-------
                        Table 16-1. Average Concentration and Meteorological Parameters for the Site in Utah



Site
Name

SLCU







Type

All
2001
sample
day

Average
UATMP
Concentration
(ppbv)



32.27
(±7.16)

Average
Maximum
Temperature
(°F)

68.26
(±2.22)
69.46
(±5.56)


Average
Temperature
(°F)

54.03
(±2.14)
54.15
(±5.50)

Average
Dewpoint
Temperature
(°F)

32.14
(±1.09)
31.69
(±2.65)

Average Wet
Bulb
Temperature
(°F)

42.64
(±1.44)
42.46
(±3.67)

Average
Relative
Humidity
(%)

44.24
(±1.67)
42.15
(±3.68)
Average u-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

-0.24
(±0.23)
-0.11
(±0.54)
Average v-
component
of the
Wind
(kts)

1.39
(±0.49)
1.06
(±1.11)
Oi

-------
               Table 16-2 - Prevalent Compound Concentration Correlations with Selected Meteorological Parameters at
                                                  Salt Lake City, Utah (SLCU)
Compound
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetylene
Benzene
Chloromethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ethylbenzene
Formaldehyde
m-,p - Xylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
o - Xylene
Propylene
Toluene
Maximum
Temperature
0.13
0.22
-0.55
-0.15
0.58
0.19
-0.04
0.11
-0.06
0.05
0.08
-0.12
-0.24
0.06
Average
Temperature
0.08
0.17
-0.62
-0.20
0.55
0.20
-0.07
0.01
-0.09
0.07
0.05
-0.15
-0.30
0.02
Dew Point
Temperature
0.02
0.07
-0.53
-0.12
0.59
0.29
-0.01
0.00
-0.03
0.12
-0.03
-0.09
-0.22
0.06
Wet Bulb
Temperature
0.05
0.15
-0.62
-0.18
0.58
0.23
-0.05
0.00
-0.07
0.08
0.04
-0.13
-0.29
0.04
Relative
Humidity
-0.19
-0.14
0.51
0.32
-0.35
0.07
0.24
-0.16
0.25
0.06
-0.04
0.28
0.34
0.16
u-component of
wind speed
0.25
0.12
0.02
-0.21
-0.11
-0.12
-0.24
0.34
-0.24
-0.07
-0.26
-0.22
-0.20
-0.26
v-component of
wind speed
-0.50
-0.33
0.05
0.07
-0.06
-0.05
0.07
-0.49
0.06
0.13
0.10
0.07
0.14
0.08
a\

-------
                   Table 16-3. TNMOC and Ozone Measured by the Salt Lake City, UT (SLCU) Monitoring Station


Average Ozone
Concentrations
from May-Aug
68.00 ppbv


Total
Number of
Ozone
Sampling
Days
123




Average
TNMOC
(speciated)
189
(±22.51)
ppbC


Average
TNMOC (w/
unknowns)
306 (±104.05)
ppbC




% TNMOC
Identified
62%


SNMOC
Compound
with the
Highest
Concentration
Isopentane
(16.20 ppbC)




Typical Emission
Sources
Non-wood upholstered
office side and arms
chairs
oo

-------
Table 16-4. Motor Vehicle Information vs. Daily Concentration for the Utah
                            Monitoring Site


Monitoring
Station
SLCU

Population
within Ten
Miles
819,703
Estimated
Number of
Motor Vehicles
Owned
606,580


Traffic Data
(Daily Average)
20,485

Average Daily
UATMP
Concentration
32.27(±7.16)ppbv
                                 16-9

-------
17.0   Data Quality
       This section the precision and accuracy of ambient air concentration measurements
during the 2001 UATMP.  As indicators of the reliability of experimental measurements, both
precision and accuracy must be considered when interpreting ambient air monitoring results. In
general, this section shows that the 2001 UATMP monitoring data are of a known and high
quality, particularly for the most program-wide prevalent compounds in urban air. Collocated
duplicate samples were collected in the State of Michigan. The precision and accuracy of these
collocated samples are discussed further in Sections 17.1.1 and 17.2. All calculations were based
on sample concentrations detected above the method detection limits for each compound.

       Calculation of method precision for the UATMP is determined by repeated analysis of
duplicate samples. Ten percent of all sample collections were duplicate samples.  A duplicate
sample is a sample collected simultaneously with a primary sample (i.e., in two separate canisters
through the same sampling system at the same time). This simultaneous collection is typically
achieved by teeing the line from the sampler to each of the two canisters and doubling the flow
rate applied to achieve integration over the 24-hour collection period.

       The only exception to this approach was for the State of Michigan, Detroit's Pilot Project.
For this Pilot Project, collocated samples were collected and analyzed in replicate. The
difference between duplicate and collocated  samples is that the duplicate samples are collected
from two canisters using one collection system,  whereas collocated samples are collected at the
same time but using two completely separate collection systems.

       Both approaches provide valuable, but different, assessment of method precision as
follows:
              Replicate analysis of duplicate samples provides information on the potential for
              variability (or precision) expected from a single collection system, but does not
              provide information on the variability expected between different collection
              systems.
                                          17-1

-------
              Replicate analysis of collocated samples provide information on the potential for
              variability (or precision) expected between different collection systems, but does
              not provide information on the variability expected from single collection
              systems.
17.1   Precision
       Precision refers to the agreement between independent measurements performed

according to identical protocols and procedures.  To quantify "sampling and analytical precision"
(i.e., how precisely the sampling and analytical methods measure ambient air concentrations),

concentrations measured during analysis of duplicate samples are compared.
 Applied to ambient air monitoring data, precision is a measurement of random errors
 inherent to the process of sampling and analyzing ambient air.
       17.1.1  Analytical Precision
       Analytical precision is a measurement of random errors associated with laboratory

analysis of environmental samples. These errors may result from various factors, but typically
originate from random "noise" inherent to analytical instruments. Laboratories can easily

evaluate analytical precision by comparing concentrations measured during replicate analysis of
the same ambient air samples. This report uses two parameters to quantify random  errors

indicated by replicate analyses of 2001 UATMP samples:
             Average concentration difference simply quantifies how replicate analytical
             results differ, on average, for each compound. When interpreting central tendency
             estimates for specific compounds sampled during the 2001 UATMP, participating
             agencies are encouraged  to compare central tendencies to the average
             concentration differences. If a compound's average concentration difference
             exceeds or nearly equals  its central tendency, the analytical method may not be
             capable of precisely characterizing annual concentrations. Therefore, data
             interpretation for these compounds should be made with caution.

             Relative percent difference (RPD) expresses average concentration differences
             relative to the average concentrations detected during replicate analyses. The
             RPD is calculated as follows:

                                          17-2

-------
   IX,
= I  1
                                           -X
                              RPD  =     _     x  wo                             m
                                          X
Where:
      Xl is the ambient air concentration of a given compound measured in one sample;
      X2 is the concentration of the same compound measured during replicate analysis; and
      Xis the arithmetic mean of X1 andX2.
       As Equation 1 shows, replicate analyses with low variability have lower RPDs (and better
precision), and replicate analyses with high variability have higher RPDs (and poorer precision).

       The following approach was employed to estimate how precisely the central laboratory
analyzed 2001 UATMP samples:

             RPDs and concentration differences were calculated for every replicate analysis
             performed during the program. In cases where compounds were not detected
             during replicate analyses, these parameters were not calculated.
             Second, to make an overall estimate of method precision, program-average RPDs
             and concentration absolute differences were calculated for each compound by
             averaging the values from the individual  replicate analyses.
       Tables 17-1 and 17-2 use both absolute average concentration differences and RPDs to
characterize the analytical precision representing all sites for VOC, representing replicate
analysis of duplicate samples and replicate analysis of collocated samples, respectively.

       In Table 17-1, the replicate analytical data for duplicate samples show that laboratory
VOC analysis precision was within the control limits of 85 to 100 percent, with the exception of
acrylonitrile and methyl methacrylate at 32.4 and 33.5 percent, respectively.  The method was
most precise when measuring air concentrations for the program-wide prevalent compounds
(i.e., compounds consistently found at levels exceeding their detection limits). For the duplicate
VOC, samples exhibit RPDs ranging from 0.2 percent to 33.5 percent. The relatively high
variability for the methyl methacrylate resulted from poor agreement from replicate analysis of
one set of samples collected on September 29, 2001 in El Paso, Texas (EPTX). The poor

                                          17-3

-------
precision for acrylonitrile was due to poor agreement from replicate samples from Muscatine, IA
(MUIA) on February 18, 2001 and from Grand Junction, CO (G2CO) on September 22, 2001.
Both of these compounds were detected in less than 4% of all replicate samples analyzed (16
samples for acrylonitrile and 7 for methyl methacrylate out of 372 possible samples). In terms of
average concentration difference, the precision of the VOC analytical method was fairly uniform
across compounds, ranging from 0.01 ppbv for dichlorotetrafluoroethane,
trichlorotrifluoroethane, bromochloromethane, and chloroform to 1.78 ppbv for acetonitrile.

       Table 17-2 shows the RPD for the results from replicate analysis of collocated VOC
samples taken at the Dearborn site in Detroit, Michigan. The replicate results from collocated
samples vary little for the majority of the compounds, ranging from 0.2 percent to 23.2 percent.
The highest RPD (23.2%) was calculated for methyl ethyl ketone, with an average concentration
difference of 0.26 ppbv, showing a low precision and variability between compounds.

       Table 17-3 presents replicate analytical data for duplicate SNMOC samples. The RPD
was less than 30 percent for every SNMOC compound with the exception of 3-methyl-l-butene
which had an RPD of 32.5 percent.  The average concentration differences observed for replicate
analyses of SNMOC compounds ranged from  0.05 to 1.5 ppbC. The total speciated and total
hydrocarbons (speciated and unspeciated) showed the greater concentration differences ranging
from 7.26 to 22.5 ppbC, respectively.

       Table 17-4 shows precision for replicate laboratory analysis of duplicate carbonyl
samples during the 2001 UATMP. The RPD ranged from 4.3 percent for formaldehyde to 27.0
percent for 2,5-dimethylbenzaldehyde.  The average concentration differences observed for
replicate analyses of carbonyl compounds was less than or equal to 0.22 ppbv. Table 17-5 shows
the RPD for the replicate analysis of collocated samples for the Dearborn site.  The replicate
analyses for collocated samplers vary for the majority of the compounds ranging from
formaldehyde at 7.8 percent to tolualdehyde at 34.1 percent.
                                          17-4

-------
       Replicate analytical data for semivolatile analysis are presented in Table 17-6. The RPD
was calculated for the only site that sampled semivolatiles in 2001, which was a site with
collocated samplers at Allen Park in Michigan. All replicate analyses were less than 18.0 percent
for all detected compounds, with the exception of phenanthrene, which had a RPD at 56.38
percent. The poor precision for phenanthrene was due to poor agreement from replicate samples
obtained on June 18, 2001. The average concentration differences observed for all observed the
replicate analyses were less than 0.05 |ig/m3.

       Replicate analytical data for hexavalent chromium (Cr6+)analysis  are presented in Table
17-7.  The RPD was calculated for only one of the four sites that sampled for Cr6"1", in 2001.  This
site was at River Rouge in Michigan, with collocated samplers. All replicate analyses were less
than 14.4 percent for hexavalent chromium. The average concentration differences observed on
the replicate analyses were less than 0.008 |ig/m3.

       Overall, replicate analyses both duplicate and collocated of VOC, SNMOC, carbonyl
compounds, semivolatile, and hexavalent chromium samples suggest that the corresponding
analytical methods consistently measured each compound in air samples at a precision with an
average concentration difference less than 20 percent. This precision level is well within the
UATMP data quality objectives (USEPA, 2002) and guidelines in the Compendium Methods
(USEPA, 1999).

       17.1.2  Sampling and Analytical Precision
       As the name implies, sampling and analytical precision quantifies random errors
associated not only with analyzing ambient air samples in the laboratory  but also with collecting
the samples in the field. This form of precision is most easily evaluated by comparing
concentrations measured in duplicate samples collected off the same manifold. During the 2001
UATMP, duplicate samples were collected on approximately 10 percent of the scheduled
sampling days, and most of these samples were analyzed in replicate. Collocated samples were
collected on a schedule designed by the State of Michigan, the only State collecting collocated
samples.

                                          17-5

-------
       To calculate sampling and analytical precision, data analysts first averaged the results
from each replicate analysis performed, then compared these average concentrations between the
two samples in each duplicate.  Tables 17-8 through 17-9, 17-11 through 17-13, 17-15 through
17-16 present average concentration differences and RPDs as estimates of duplicate and
collocated sampling and analytical precision for VOC, SNMOC, carbonyls, semivolatiles, and
hexavalent chromium measurements, respectively.  It should be noted that the number of
observations from Tables 17-1 through 17-7, in comparison to the respective tables listed for
duplicate analyses in  Tables 17-8 through 17-16, is approximately twice as high.

       Table 17-8, presenting the sampling and analytical data for VOC, shows that the
duplicates samples collected during the 2001 UATMP were  in excellent agreement (i.e., below
30 percent average RPD). The  average concentration difference ranged from 0.01 for
trichloroethylene to 2.92 ppbv for acetonitrile.  The collocated VOC sampling and analytical data
are presented in Table 17-9, and the comparison between duplicate and collocated data is shown
in Table 17-10.  The greatest differences in average RPD for collocated samples were measured
for acetonitrile and methylene chloride, at 42.1 and 118.7  percent, respectively.  The collocated
samples consistently  show a greater average RPD with comparison to the duplicate samples for
the higher molecular  weight compounds (i.e., methyl isobutyl ketone and higher), as Table 17-10
presents. The samples that are represented as Not Applicable ("NA"), and have a RPD for the
corresponding duplicate or collocated sample, are also flagged with an "NA".

       The SNMOC  precision for duplicate samples is presented in Table 17-11. Relative
percent differences for replicate analyses for duplicate samples ranged from 3.1 for ethane to
121.4 percent for dodecane. This high variability is due to the low detections - less than 5 times
the detection limit. The VOC and  SNMOC sampling and analytical precision data presented in
Tables 17-8 and 17-11 do not differ significantly from the analytical precision data in Tables 17-
1 and 17-3, respectively. This similarity suggests that limitations associated with laboratory
analysis of the VOC and SNMOC  samples during the 2001 UATMP probably outweighed
random errors associated with sampling procedures.
                                          17-6

-------
       The duplicate sampling results presented in Table 17-12 show that the results for carbonyl
compounds were relatively precise. The high variability, RPD above 30 percent, is due to
detection at levels less than five times the detection limits.  Variability is higher at these low
concentrations. The high variability is also shown for the collocated samples presented in Table
17-13, but the variability is not caused by low concentrations in the samples. After removing all
of the compound results below five times the detection limit, the RPD values range from 26.1 to
78.2 percent, in comparison to 26.9 to 215 percent (as shown in Table 17-12) including low
detections. For most compounds, the duplicate sampling and analytical RPDs (see Table 17-12)
were notably higher than the analytical precision RPDs (see Table  17-4)—a trend that differs
from the trend observed for VOC or SNMOC.  This observation suggests that random errors
associated with collecting air samples and random errors associated with analyzing these samples
both contributed significantly to overall imprecision in the carbonyl compound sampling and
analytical method.  As the estimates of sampling and analytical precision show, however, such
sources of contamination did not have significant impacts on the carbonyl compound monitoring
results.  The comparisons between duplicate and collocated samples, presented in Table 17-14,
also show the variability between samplers  as previously encountered with the VOC samples.

       The sampling and analytical precision for collocated semivolatile samples are presented
in Table 17-15, and was less than 10 percent for all compounds detected.  The sampling and
analytical precision data presented in Table 17-6 do not differ significantly from the analytical
precision data in Table 17-15.  This similarity suggests that limitations associated with laboratory
analysis of the semivolatile samples during the 2001 UATMP probably outweighed random
errors associated with sampling procedures.

       Analytical data for hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) samples are presented in Table 17-16.
The RPD was calculated for only one of the four sites that sampled for Cr6"1", in 2001. The  RPD
is 40 percent for this collocated site but less than 20 percent for values higher than five times the
detection limit. All replicate analyses were less than 40.7 percent for all detected compounds.
The average concentration differences observed on the replicate analyses was less than 0.024
|ig/m3.

                                          17-7

-------
       To summarize, duplicate sampling results indicate that the 2001 UATMP air quality
measurements generally have sampling and analytical precision better than 25 percent—well
within the UATMP data quality objectives of 100 percent (USEPA, 1988). This excellent
measurement precision suggests that the 2001 UATMP monitoring data offer a precise account
of air quality at the selected monitoring locations, especially for the most program-wide prevalent
compounds. Although random errors had very small impacts  on measurement of the less
program-wide prevalent compounds, participating agencies should note that the central
tendencies for these compounds  have nearly the same magnitude as the average concentration
difference. Therefore, central tendency concentrations for these less program-wide prevalent
compounds should be interpreted with caution.

       Measurements  from collocated samplers have higher variations than the standard
duplicate sampling as performed by the National UATMP.  Because collocated sampling varies
the sampling media as well as the sampler (including sampling probes), higher RPD values
should be expected.  The variation, however, should not cause the validity of the data to be
questioned, but should allow the State Agencies extra information to qualify the data.

17.2   Accuracy
       Highly accurate air sampling and analytical methods can measure air concentrations in
very close agreement to actual ambient levels. Laboratories typically evaluate their accuracy by
analyzing external audit samples and comparing measured concentrations to the known
concentrations of the audit samples.
 Accuracy indicates the extent to which experimental measurements represent their
 corresponding "true" or "actual" values.
       Air Toxics Pilot Laboratory Intercomparison studies were performed in November 2001.
A Quality Assurance Report for all laboratories that participated in this study is available on
EPA's web site:  http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/airtox/atpilot.pdf. ERG also
                                          17-8

-------
prepares audits standards for different State laboratories.  Table 17-17 presents the analytical

comparisons for carbonyls between ERG and other State laboratories.


       The accuracy of the 2001 UATMP monitoring data can also be assessed qualitatively by

reviewing the accuracy of the monitoring methods and how they were implemented:
             The sampling and analytical methods used in the 2001 UATMP (i.e.,
             Compendium Methods TO-11A and TO-15) have been approved by EPA for
             accurately measuring ambient levels of VOC and carbonyl compounds,
             respectively—an approval that is based on many years of research into the
             development of ambient air monitoring methodologies.

             When collecting and analyzing ambient air samples, all field sampling staff and
             laboratory analysts strictly followed quality control and quality assurance
             guidelines detailed in the respective monitoring methods. This strict adherence to
             the well-documented sampling and analytical methods suggests, though certainly
             does not prove, that the 2001 UATMP monitoring data accurately represent
             ambient air quality.
                                          17-9

-------
Table 17-1. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 372 Replicates
                        on Duplicate Samples
Compound
Acetylene
Propylene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
1,3 -Butadiene
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Acetonitrile
Trichlorofluoromethane
Acrylonitrile
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
trans - 1,2 - Dichloroethylene
1,1 - Dichloroethane
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Chloroprene
cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloroethane
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloropropane
Ethyl Acrylate
Bromodichloromethane
Trichloroethylene
Methyl Methacrylate
cis -1,3 - Dichloropropene
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
trans - 1,3 - Dichloropropene
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
Number of
Observations
371
372
372
372
1
0
137
9
13
31
371
16
4
286
366
0
0
121
339
0
0
4
26
0
0
17
372
244
4
0
0
0
16
7
0
37
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
9.55
10.88
6.30
7.96
NA
NA
15.16
12.77
23.45
8.68
7.69
32.43
9.93
13.71
10.75
NA
NA
8.60
29.57
NA
NA
3.16
16.76
NA
NA
20.03
6.95
9.11
0.15
NA
NA
NA
20.57
33.52
NA
13.56
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.15
0.06
0.09
0.06
0.01
NA
0.03
0.04
0.07
1.78
0.03
0.43
0.03
0.06
0.01
NA
NA
0.07
0.24
NA
NA
0.01
0.01
NA
NA
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.18
NA
NA
NA
0.04
0.60
NA
0.20
NA
NA
                               17-10

-------
Table 17-1. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 372 Replicates
                  on Duplicate Samples (Continued)
Compound
Toluene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
n-Octane
Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p - Xylene
Bromoform
Styrene
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
o - Xylene
1 , 3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
m - Dichlorobenzene
Chloromethylbenzene
p - Dichlorobenzene
o - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachloro-1 3 -Butadiene
Number of
Observations
372
0
0
181
37
5
346
362
0
74
0
332
134
271
0
0
14
0
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
6.14
NA
NA
19.77
7.52
5.16
8.26
7.63
NA
14.29
NA
8.96
8.18
10.14
NA
NA
9.96
NA
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.13
NA
NA
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.07
NA
0.04
NA
0.04
0.03
0.03
NA
NA
0.03
NA
NA
NA
                               17-11

-------
Table 17-2. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 104 Replicates
                        of Collocated Samples
Compound
Acetylene
Propylene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
1,3 -Butadiene
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Acetonitrile
Trichlorofluoromethane
Acrylonitrile
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
trans - 1,2 - Dichloroethylene
1,1 - Dichloroethane
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Chloroprene
cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloroethane
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloropropane
Ethyl Acrylate
Bromodichloromethane
Trichloroethylene
Methyl Methacrylate
cis -1,3 - Dichloropropene
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
trans - 1,3 - Dichloropropene
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
Number of
Observations
104
104
104
104
0
0
41
0
2
38
104
0
0
100
104
0
0
7
86
0
1
0
3
0
0
2
104
99
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
12
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
7.09
5.71
5.16
6.45
NA
NA
19.29
NA
NA
16.78
6.19
NA
NA
7.33
8.53
NA
NA
7.37
23.17
NA
NA
NA
17.68
NA
NA
15.95
3.95
7.70
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.48
NA
NA
7.07
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.10
0.10
0.03
0.04
NA
NA
0.03
NA
0.07
0.58
0.02
NA
NA
0.07
0.01
NA
NA
0.06
0.26
NA
0.34
NA
0.03
NA
NA
0.01
0.03
0.01
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.14
NA
NA
0.13
NA
NA
                                17-12

-------
Table 17-2. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 104 Replicates
                  of Collocated Samples (Continued)
Compound
Toluene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
n-Octane
Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p - Xylene
Bromoform
Styrene
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
o - Xylene
1 , 3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
m - Dichlorobenzene
Chloromethylbenzene
p - Dichlorobenzene
o - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachloro-1 3 -Butadiene
Number of
Observations
104
0
0
52
47
0
100
104
1
7
0
102
44
99
0
0
4
0
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
5.56
NA
NA
21.12
14.11
NA
7.61
7.36
NA
14.24
NA
8.34
9.77
8.41
NA
NA
0.23
NA
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.07
NA
NA
0.04
0.02
NA
0.02
0.03
0.77
0.04
NA
0.02
0.04
0.02
NA
NA
0.08
NA
NA
NA
                               17-13

-------
Table 17-3. SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 192 Replicates
                         on Duplicate Samples
Compound
ithylene
Acetylene
ithane
'ropylene
'ropane
'ropyne
sobutane
sobutene/ 1 -Butene
,3 -Butadiene
i-Butane
rans-2-Butene
;is-2-Butene
3 -Methyl- 1-butene
sopentane
-Pentene
2 -Methyl- 1 -butene
i-Pentane
soprene
rans-2-Pentene
;is-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
t-Methyl- 1 -pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3 -Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3 -Methylpentane
2 -Methyl- 1 -pentene
-Hexene
2-Ethyl- 1-butene
i-Hexane
rans-2-Hexene
;is-2-Hexene
VIethylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
benzene
Number of
Observations
192
192
192
192
192
0
192
191
64
192
106
179
25
178
168
106
192
158
147
151
115
190
60
2
178
192
192
191
24
192
1
191
1
7
189
189
192
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
2.97
3.65
1.97
3.26
2.45
NA
3.30
5.31
6.51
3.37
5.42
8.98
32.45
12.56
12.11
14.18
3.33
5.04
4.51
6.39
6.40
11.49
14.30
NA
9.50
20.23
16.37
4.25
10.03
9.20
NA
6.40
NA
7.14
4.74
7.29
5.85
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.11
0.12
0.16
0.06
0.24
NA
0.10
0.16
0.06
0.25
0.06
0.05
0.70
1.45
0.16
0.14
0.16
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.07
0.17
0.27
0.06
0.14
0.44
0.08
0.27
0.05
0.92
0.15
0.31
0.12
0.06
0.06
0.18
                                 17-14

-------
Table 17-3. SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 192 Replicates
                   on Duplicate Samples (Continued)
Compound
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
i-Heptane
VIethylcyclohexane
2,2,3 -Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
i-Octane
ithylbenzene
n-Xylene/p-Xylene
ityrene
)-Xylene
.-Nonene
i-Nonane
sopropylbenzene
i-Pinene
i-Propylbenzene
n-Ethyltoluene
>-Ethyltoluene
, 3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
)-Ethyltoluene
)-Pinene
,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
i-Decane
,2,3 -Trimethylbenzene
n-Diethylbenzene
>-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
i-Undecane
Number of
Observations
191
179
192
167
58
186
182
178
77
157
192
90
116
54
155
168
186
181
176
49
133
54
74
105
158
143
115
106
94
183
0
161
107
104
109
30
183
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
5.92
7.91
9.03
18.04
9.16
7.18
7.66
9.96
9.16
6.93
8.21
16.84
14.42
7.46
20.19
17.31
19.65
13.79
10.39
12.90
14.28
6.78
12.70
8.64
9.53
11.58
11.43
13.31
11.65
8.14
NA
19.91
9.07
26.41
13.96
6.25
15.86
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.10
0.11
0.08
0.22
0.14
0.17
0.07
0.12
0.20
0.08
0.92
0.18
0.15
0.07
0.18
0.21
0.53
0.33
0.15
0.18
0.16
0.15
0.29
0.06
0.13
0.11
0.09
0.15
0.22
0.11
NA
0.25
0.09
0.26
0.14
0.06
0.24
                                 17-15

-------
Table 17-3. SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 192 Replicates
                   on Duplicate Samples (Continued)
Compound
1-Dodecene
i-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
i-Tridecane
FNMOC (speciated)
FNMOC (w/ unknowns)
Number of
Observations
25
139
0
29
192
192
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
16.31
12.37
NA
20.99
11.67
10.01
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.43
0.22
NA
0.36
7.26
22.54
                                 17-16

-------
Table 17-4. Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision:  Total 588 Replicates
                          on Duplicate Samples
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/Isobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Number of
Observations
589
576
567
529
308
548
576
99
441
542
512
213
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis (%)
4.24
5.20
4.55
12.23
14.57
16.21
15.37
25.78
24.13
23.18
10.37
27.04
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.22
0.05
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
                                  17-17

-------
Table 17-5. Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 116 Replicates
                          of Collocated Samples
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/Isobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2.5-Dimethvlbenzaldehvde
Number of
Observations
112
115
116
106
73
110
106
35
106
112
111
31
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis
(%)
7.8
24.4
21.0
20.2
27.0
17.1
22.8
22.0
15.5
27.6
15.6
28.0
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
0.26
0.13
0.17
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.02
                                 17-18

-------
Table 17-6. Semivolatile Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 82 Replicates
                           on Collocated Samples
Compound
Jhenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
A.cenaphthene
Jhenanthrene
"luoranthene
Number of
Observations
1
44
82
80
2
7
15
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis
(%)
ND
17.92
11.99
11.41
ND
56.38
13.53
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (//g/m3)
0.117
0.008
0.021
0.015
0.031
0.038
0.127
                                   17-19

-------
Table 17-7. Hexavalent Chromium Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 76
                     Replicates on Collocated Samples
Compound
iexavalent Chromium
Number of
Observations
68
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis
(%)
14.4
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (//g/m3)
0.008
                                  17-20

-------
Table 17-8. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision:  Total 198 Duplicate Samples
Compound
Acetylene
Propylene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
1,3 -Butadiene
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Acetonitrile
Trichlorofluoromethane
Acrylonitrile
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
trans - 1,2 - Dichloroethylene
1,1 - Dichloroethane
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Chloroprene
cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloroethane
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloropropane
Ethyl Acrylate
Bromodichloromethane
Trichloroethylene
Methyl Methacrylate
cis -1,3 - Dichloropropene
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
trans - 1,3 - Dichloropropene
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
Number of
Observations
197
198
198
198
0
0
63
5
7
17
197
8
2
137
193
0
0
66
182
0
0
4
11
0
0
7
198
127
2
0
0
0
8
1
0
18
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
5.64
11.40
6.01
8.69
NA
NA
15.50
9.57
17.67
13.49
8.57
14.78
17.86
28.41
12.05
NA
NA
9.52
29.68
NA
NA
14.76
27.58
NA
NA
11.81
6.75
11.03
NA
NA
NA
NA
13.52
NA
NA
23.90
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (ppbv)
0.11
0.08
0.26
0.06
NA
NA
0.04
0.05
0.15
2.92
0.03
0.70
0.05
0.15
0.02
NA
NA
0.08
0.40
NA
NA
0.09
0.05
NA
NA
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.16
NA
NA
NA
0.01
1.64
NA
0.33
NA
NA
                                   17-21

-------
Table 17-8. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 198
               Duplicate Samples (Continued)
Compound
Toluene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
n-Octane
Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p - Xylene
Bromoform
Styrene
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
o - Xylene
1 , 3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
m - Dichlorobenzene
Chloromethylbenzene
p - Dichlorobenzene
o - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachloro-1 3 -Butadiene
Number of
Observations
197
0
0
91
19
3
182
193
0
40
0
177
70
140
0
0
14
0
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
10.47
NA
NA
23.15
11.00
17.45
9.81
8.44
NA
18.49
NA
9.38
7.65
7.41
NA
NA
7.84
NA
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (ppbv)
0.22
NA
NA
0.07
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.08
NA
0.03
NA
0.04
0.03
0.02
NA
NA
0.02
NA
NA
NA
                          17-22

-------
Table 17-9. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 38 Collocated Samples
Compound
Acetylene
Propylene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
1,3 -Butadiene
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Acetonitrile
Trichlorofluoromethane
Acrylonitrile
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
trans - 1,2 - Dichloroethylene
1,1 - Dichloroethane
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Chloroprene
cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloroethane
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloropropane
Ethyl Acrylate
Bromodichloromethane
Trichloroethylene
Methyl Methacrylate
cis -1,3 - Dichloropropene
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
trans - 1,3 - Dichloropropene
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
Number of
Observations
38
38
38
38
0
0
12
0
0
14
38
0
0
37
38
0
0
2
32
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
38
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses at
Collocated Sites (%)
7.39
13.44
3.08
5.16
NA
NA
21.77
NA
NA
42.08
7.25
NA
NA
118.70
10.30
NA
NA
17.29
29.96
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.93
11.05
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
21.41
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses at Co-Located
Sites (ppbv)
0.12
0.19
0.02
0.03
NA
NA
0.05
NA
NA
4.91
0.02
NA
NA
1.26
0.01
NA
NA
0.10
0.19
NA
NA
NA
0.06
NA
NA
NA
0.05
0.01
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.07
NA
NA
                                   17-23

-------
Table 17-9. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 38
              Collocated Samples (Continued)
Compound
Toluene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
n-Octane
Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p - Xylene
Bromoform
Styrene
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
o - Xylene
1 , 3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
m - Dichlorobenzene
Chloromethylbenzene
p - Dichlorobenzene
o - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachloro-1 3 -Butadiene
Number of
Observations
38
0
0
21
15
0
37
38
0
4
0
37
19
37
0
0
1
0
0
0
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses at
Collocated Sites (%)
14.53
NA
NA
31.50
13.44
NA
17.77
26.00
NA
NA
NA
29.08
15.44
26.80
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses at Co-Located
Sites (ppbv)
0.15
NA
NA
0.07
0.03
NA
0.04
0.15
NA
0.07
NA
0.07
0.05
0.06
NA
NA
0.13
NA
NA
NA
                          17-24

-------
Table 17-10. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision:  Comparison of Duplicate
                      and Collocated Samples - VOCs
Compound
Acetylene
Propylene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
1,3 -Butadiene
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Acetonitrile
Trichlorofluoromethane
Acrylonitrile
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
trans - 1,2 - Dichloroethylene
1,1 - Dichloroethane
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Chloroprene
cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloroethane
1,1,1 - Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether
1,2 - Dichloropropane
Ethyl Acrylate
Bromodichloromethane
Trichloroethylene
Methyl Methacrylate
cis -1,3 - Dichloropropene
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
trans - 1,3 - Dichloropropene
Average RPD
in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
5.64
11.40
6.01
8.69
NA
NA
15.50
9.57
17.67
13.49
8.57
14.78
17.86
36.02
12.05
NA
NA
9.52
29.68
NA
NA
14.76
27.58
NA
NA
11.81
6.75
11.03
NA
NA
NA
NA
13.52
NA
NA
23.90
NA
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Collocated
Duplicates (%)
7.39
13.44
3.08
5.16
NA
NA
21.77
NA
NA
42.08
7.25
NA
NA
118.70
10.30
NA
NA
17.29
29.96
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.93
11.05
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
21.41
NA
Average Concentration
Difference (%)
30.9
18.0
48.7
40.6
NA
NA
40.5
NA
NA
211.9
15.4
NA
NA
229.5
14.6
NA
NA
81.6
1.0
NA
NA
NA
100.0
NA
NA
NA
2.6
0.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10.4
NA
                                  17-25

-------
Table 17-10. VOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Comparison of Duplicate
                and Collocated Samples - VOCs (Continued)
Compound
1,1,2 - Trichloroethane
Toluene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
n-Octane
Tetrachloroethylene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p - Xylene
Bromoform
Styrene
1,1,2,2 - Tetrachloroethane
o - Xylene
1 , 3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
m - Dichlorobenzene
Chloromethylbenzene
p - Dichlorobenzene
o - Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachloro-1 3 -Butadiene
Average RPD
in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
NA
10.47
NA
NA
23.15
11.00
17.45
9.81
8.44
NA
18.49
NA
9.38
7.65
7.41
NA
NA
7.84
NA
NA
NA
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Collocated
Duplicates (%)
NA
14.53
NA
NA
31.50
13.44
NA
17.77
26.00
NA
NA
NA
29.08
15.44
26.80
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Average Concentration
Difference (%)
NA
38.8
NA
NA
36.0
22.2
NA
81.2
208.1
NA
100.0
NA
210.0
101.9
261.5
NA
NA
100.0
NA
NA
NA
                                  17-26

-------
Table 17-11. SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 104 Duplicate Samples
Compound
ithylene
Acetylene
ithane
'ropylene
'ropane
'ropyne
sobutane
sobutene/ 1 -Butene
,3 -Butadiene
i-Butane
rans-2-Butene
;is-2-Butene
3 -Methyl- 1-butene
sopentane
-Pentene
2 -Methyl- 1 -butene
i-Pentane
soprene
rans-2-Pentene
;is-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
t-Methyl- 1 -pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3 -Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3 -Methylpentane
2 -Methyl- 1 -pentene
-Hexene
2-Ethyl- 1-butene
i-Hexane
rans-2-Hexene
;is-2-Hexene
VIethylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
benzene
Number of
Observations
104
104
104
104
104
0
104
103
32
104
57
95
14
99
90
62
104
84
79
78
60
103
29
2
95
104
104
103
12
104
1
103
0
5
103
102
104
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
7.06
4.68
3.12
10.22
6.12
NA
7.81
10.43
9.26
4.11
7.16
7.59
35.44
21.23
44.82
14.50
11.95
5.66
6.35
5.09
5.84
11.59
29.29
6.08
11.69
8.58
49.57
6.78
9.21
14.93
NA
10.16
NA
5.53
10.21
5.27
8.79
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (ppbv)
0.25
0.14
0.17
0.16
0.50
NA
0.15
0.18
0.05
0.22
0.07
0.06
0.12
1.30
0.25
0.13
0.41
0.05
0.07
0.05
0.12
0.07
0.36
0.02
0.08
0.08
0.56
0.13
0.17
0.09
0.92
0.45
NA
0.12
0.15
0.04
0.34
                                      17-27

-------
Table 17-11. SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 104
                 Duplicate Samples (Continued)
Compound
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
i-Heptane
VIethylcyclohexane
2,2,3 -Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
i-Octane
ithylbenzene
n-Xylene/p-Xylene
ityrene
)-Xylene
.-Nonene
i-Nonane
sopropylbenzene
i-Pinene
i-Propylbenzene
n-Ethyltoluene
)-Ethyltoluene
, 3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
)-Ethyltoluene
)-Pinene
,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
i-Decane
,2,3 -Trimethylbenzene
n-Diethylbenzene
>-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
Number of
Observations
103
97
104
93
27
101
98
96
40
85
104
46
61
26
82
90
101
97
94
23
68
27
39
57
87
79
58
55
48
97
0
87
56
54
58
15
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
13.57
21.27
4.54
18.26
14.97
9.19
7.27
13.33
4.86
9.66
9.93
17.44
11.10
10.96
7.24
12.29
11.17
76.67
11.19
9.36
8.35
7.09
15.59
11.57
12.08
10.26
13.78
13.36
51.21
11.61
NA
75.01
12.77
28.16
16.71
18.58
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (ppbv)
0.22
0.23
0.04
0.25
0.24
0.16
0.06
0.10
0.13
0.08
0.81
0.24
0.09
0.24
0.06
0.13
0.23
0.94
0.10
0.18
0.11
0.05
0.23
0.11
0.13
0.11
0.12
0.16
0.55
0.13
NA
0.44
0.16
0.40
0.18
0.15
                            17-28

-------
Table 17-11. SNMOC Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 104
                 Duplicate Samples (Continued)
Compound
i-Undecane
1-Dodecene
i-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
i-Tridecane
FNMOC (speciated)
FNMOC (w/ unknowns)
Number of
Observations
100
12
74
0
18
104
104
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
50.82
47.40
121.36
NA
18.64
7.87
17.33
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (ppbv)
1.13
1.08
0.93
NA
0.48
6.72
37.83
                            17-29

-------
Table 17-12. Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 290 Duplicate Samples
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/Isobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2.5-Dimethvlbenzaldehvde
Number of
Observations
290
285
280
261
158
272
285
51
222
272
252
104
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses
of Duplicates (%)
12.90
22.92
25.14
20.79
15.23
29.87
32.42
38.53
26.00
48.11
26.52
52.30
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (ppbv)
1.17
0.21
0.27
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.09
0.02
                                      17-30

-------
Table 17-13. Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 54 Collocated Samples
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/Isobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2.5-Dimethvlbenzaldehvde
Number of
Observations
48
49
50
47
32
48
48
16
48
46
48
15
Average RPD in
Replicate
Analysis (%)
37.86
151.11
215.15
60.45
26.90
50.97
37.37
117.02
66.54
38.53
73.16
131.71
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (ppbv)
1.23
0.94
1.54
0.12
0.04
0.15
0.03
0.10
0.06
0.02
0.14
0.03
                                     17-31

-------
Table 17-14. Carbonyl Sampling and Analytical Precision: Comparison of Duplicate and
                         Collocated Samples - Carbonyls
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/Isobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2.5-Dimethvlbenzaldehvde
Average RPD
in Replicate
Analyses of
Duplicates (%)
12.90
22.92
25.14
20.79
15.23
29.87
32.42
38.53
26.00
48.11
26.52
52.30
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses of
Collocated
Duplicates (%)
37.86
151.11
215.15
60.45
26.90
50.97
37.37
117.02
66.54
38.53
73.16
131.71
Average Concentration
Difference (%)
193.4
559.2
755.7
190.7
76.6
70.6
15.3
203.7
155.9
19.9
175.9
151.8
                                     17-32

-------
Table 17-15. Semivolatile Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 40 Collocated Samples
Compound
Jhenol
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
A.cenaphthene
Jhenanthrene
)i-n-butvl ohthalate
Number of
Observations
1
22
40
39
1
4
8
Average RPD in
Replicate Analyses
Collocated
Samples (%)
ND
6.98
6.66
7.56
ND
1.97
ND
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analyses of Collocated
Samples (//ug/m3)
0.117
0.008
0.021
0.015
0.031
0.038
0.127
                                       17-33

-------
Table 17-16. Hexavalent Chromium Sampling and Analytical Precision: Total 44
                            Collocated Samples
Compound
iexavalent Chromium
Number of
Observations
38
Average RPD in
Replicate Analysis
(%)
40.7
Average Concentration
Difference in Replicate
Analysis (//g/m3)
0.024
                                  17-34

-------
Table 17-17. Round Robin Analytical Comparisons for Carbonyl Samples
Audit
Date
2/27/01
3/12/01
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5 - Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde

Acetaldehyde

Acetone

Propionaldehyde

Crotonaldehyde

Butyraldehyde

Benzaldehyde

Isovaleraldehyde

Valeraldehyde

Tolualdehydes

Hexaldehyde

Sample ID
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
E VT Audit-3
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
19403
17839
Concentration (fj, g cartridge)
Reported
0.255
0.367
0.399
0.280
0.276
0.309
0.320
0.270
0.315
0.979
0.279
0.322
0.177
0.18
0.346
0.333
0.484
0.574
0.244
0.254
0
0
0.273
0.274
0.174
0.193
0.217
0.2
0.228
0.259
0.866
0.959
0.183
0.188
Theoretical
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
%
Difference
94
136
148
104
102
114
119
100
117
121
103
119
66
67
128
123
179
213
90
94
0
0
101
101
64
71
80
74
84
96
107
118
68
70
                              17-35

-------
Table 17-17. Round Robin Analytical Comparisons for Carbonyl Samples (Continued)
Audit
Date

3/19/01
Compound
2,5 - Dimethylbenzaldehyde

Formaldehyde

Acetaldehyde

Acetone

Propionaldehyde

Crotonaldehyde

Butyraldehyde

Benzaldehyde

Isovaleraldehyde

Valeraldehyde

Tolualdehydes

Hexaldehyde

2,5 -Dimethylbenzaldehyde

Sample ID
19403
17839
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
19401
19402
Concentration (p. g cartridge)
Reported
0.239
0.247
0.227
0.258
0.296
0.303
0.353
0.365
0.241
0.254
0.043
0
0.213
0.187
0.237
0.249
0.203
0.227
0.167
0.183
0.719
0.757
0.185
0.150
0.230
0.241
Theoretical
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
0.270
%
Difference
89
91
84
96
110
112
131
135
89
94
16
0
79
69
88
92
75
84
62
68
89
93
69
56
85
89
                                    17-36

-------
18.0   Conclusions and Recommendations
       As indicated throughout this report, UATMP monitoring data offer a wealth of

information for evaluating trends and patterns in air quality and should ultimately help a wide
range of audiences understand the complex nature of urban air pollution. The following

discussion summarizes the main conclusions of this report and presents recommendations for
ongoing urban air monitoring efforts.


18.1   Conclusions
       Analyses of the 2001 UATMP monitoring data identified the following notable trends
and patterns in urban air pollution:
       Stationary emission sources of toxics.  The Denver, CO site had the greatest number o f
       stationary sources within a 10-mile radius reporting to the National Emissions Inventory
       (514 facilities). However, this site ranked tenth in average hydrocarbon concentration,
       twenty-fifth in polar compound concentration, twenty-seventh in halogenated
       hydrocarbon and carbonyl concentrations seem to correspond to the number of facilities
       emitting toxic compounds, while the halogenated hydrocarbon and polar compounds did
       not. The Queen Valley, AZ site had the fewest number of stationary sources (2 facilities)
       and this site ranked thirty-fifth (or last) in average hydrocarbon concentration, seventh in
       polar compound concentration, thirty-fourth in halogenated hydrocarbon concentration,
       and did not measure carbonyl compounds. The Queen Valley hydrocarbon and
       halogenated hydrocarbon concentrations seem to correspond to the number of facilities
       emitting toxic compounds, while the polar compounds did not.

       Mobile emission sources of toxics.  It was estimated that the Camden, NJ site had the
       highest number of cars within a  10-mile radius (1,564,196 cars), while the Beulah, ND
       site had the fewer (4,591 cars). However, the Camden site ranked fairly low for its
       compound concentrations, with the polar compounds ranking the highest at fifteenth. The
       Beulah site's concentration rankings corresponded well with its lack of automobiles, with
       the polar compounds again ranking highest (twenty-first) and hydrocarbon ranking the
       lowest (thirty-fourth). It is also estimated that the Elizabeth, New Jersey site had the most
       number of automobiles pass near the site (170,000), while the Barceloneta, Puerto Rico
       has the lowest number of vehicles (10) passing by the site. The Elizabeth site's different
       compounds all ranked in the middle of the pack, while the Barceloneta site's carbonyls
       ranked last and polar compounds ranked first. A comparison of the BTEX compounds
       (Benzene,  Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes) with a Roadside speciation profile
       suggests the high influence of motor vehicles as an emission source. The three Arizona
       site BETX profiles bor the closest resemblance to the Roadside speciation profile.
                                          18-1

-------
Ambient air concentrations of hydrocarbons. Levels of airborne hydrocarbons were
highest at the Grand Junction, CO monitoring location and were lowest at the Queen
Valley, AZ monitoring location (1.06 ppbv).  Correlations among the hydrocarbons and
the weather parameters at the GJCO an QVAZ sites tended to be weak. While a large
number of reporting sites had significant negative correlations with average maximum
and average temperature, and dew point and wet bulb temperature, this trend did not hold
true at all sites measuring hydrocarbon compounds. However, each prevalent
hydrocarbon compound, with the exception of toluene, had at least one site report a
negative correlation across the four previously mentioned weather parameters. At the
SPAZ site in Phoenix, Arizona, all of the hydrocarbon compounds had negative Pearson
correlations with the same temperature and moisture variables listed above.

Ambient air concentrations ofhalogenated hydrocarbons.  Levels of airborne
halogenated hydrocarbons were highest at the Allen Park, Detroit, MI monitoring location
(19.28ppbv) and were lowest at the Tupelo, MS monitoring location (2.7 ppbv).  These
two sites had the same distinction in the 2000 UATMP report. The APMI site's
concentration was more than three times the next highest site's concentration (BAPR with
6.38 ppbv). Little variation and demonstrated for halogenated hydrocarbon
concentrations across the majority of the sites participating in the 2001 UATMP.  Strong
to moderately strong positive correlations were noted between methylene chloride and the
weather parameters, with the exception of the wind components at the APMI site. All of
the sites where significant correlations with the halogenated hydrocarbon compounds
were calculated, with the exception of the DATA site, reported a positive correlation with
average maximum and average temperature, and dew point and wet bulb temperature.
Chloromethane had the highest (positive) correlation with the four previously mentioned
temperature and moisture variables at the Arlington, Texas site among all of the
halogenated hydrocarbon compounds, and among all of the compound in the UATMP.
Negative correlations with the wind components and halogenated hydrocarbon
compounds were also reported at several of the participating  sites.

Ambient air concentrations of polar compounds. Only one polar compound was
determined to be "prevalent: in this year's UATMP, and that compound is  methyl ethyl
ketone. Levels of airborne polar compounds were highest at  the Barceloneta , PR
monitoring location (9.19 ppbv) and were lowest at the Cedar Rapids, IA monitoring
location (1.24 ppbv). These two sites also had the same distinction in the 2000 UATMP
report. Although the BARP site had the least traffic flowing  on nearby roads, it had the
highest polar compound concentration, and also had high concentrations for hydrocarbons
and halogenated hydrocarbons.  Three sites reported significant positive correlations with
methyl ethyl ketone and the average maximum and average temperature, and dew point
and wet bulb temperature. The San Juan, PR site had a calculated significant negative
correlations between the wind components and methyl ethyl ketone.

Ambient air concentrations ofcarbonyl compounds.  Levels of airborne carbonyl
compounds were highest at the River Rouge, Detroit, MI monitoring location (27.44
ppbv) and were lowest at the San Juan, PR monitoring location (0.87 ppbv).  The RRMI

                                   18-2

-------
site had the highest concentration of carbonyl compounds in the 2000 UATMP report,
while the Barceloneta, PR station ranked lowest last year. However, BAPR was only
slightly higher than the SJPR site in 2001. For the carbonyl compound concentrations,
little variation was demonstrated, similar to the halogenated hydrocarbon compounds.
While a large number of sites reported significant negative correlations between acetone
and average maximum and average temperature, and dew point and wet bulb temperature,
a large number of sites reported a positive correlation with formaldehyde and the four
temperature and moisture variables. Significant correlations were also established with
acetaldehyde and the previously mentioned weather parameters, but that compound had
an equal number of positive and negative correlations.

Specific meteorological trends for participating states. UATMP concentrations were
correlated with the selected meteorological parameters.  For those sites sampling
SNMOC and  SVOC, similar analysis was performed. Also, on days in which the average
ozone concentrations were considered high (a day in which the concentration was higher
than the average concentration), a weather map analysis was performed.  The following
specific meteorological trends resulted from analysis of the 2001 UATMP monitoring
data:

1.     Arizona: All three sites exhibited an average annual relative humidity less than
       forty percent. All prevalent compound concentrations had a negative tendency
       with the selected meteorological parameters. High concentrations days for ozone
       corresponded with high temperatures and with an upper level ridge in place over
       the West.

2.     Florida: The Florida sites all exhibit a high annual average maximum (near 80°)
       and average (mid 60°s) temperature, as well as a high relative humidity (65-70%).
       The carbonyl compounds had the strongest correlations with the weather
       parameters. High ozone concentration days were related to the presence high
       pressure near the Panhandle, and light northwesterly winds.

3.     Michigan:  The Michigan sites had cool annual average temperature ranging from
       the low 40s to the upper 40s. Winds also tended to be breezy at the sites on
       annual average. However, generally light winds and ridging aloft were related to
       high ozone concentration days.  The majority of the significant correlations at the
       Michigan sites tended to be positive.

4.     New Jersey: Annual  average temperature and moisture amount varies across the
       New Jersey sites, depending on geographic location. The majority of the
       significant correlations at the New Jersey sites tended to be positive, with the
       exception of the Chester, NJ site. Ridging in the east and light winds seems
       related to high ozone concentration days.

5.     Texas: The two Texas sites tended to both have high average maximum and
       average temperatures, however, the Arlington site was  significantly more humid

                                   18-3

-------
             than the El Paso site, due to their locations. The Arlington's sites correlations
             tended to be positive between the compounds and the temperature and moisture
             variables. But the El Paso site's compounds didn't follow this trend as well.
             High ozone days are generally associated with ridging aloft over the Southwest
             and South central U.S. and light south to southeasterly winds.

       6.     Utah: While the Salt Lake City site had a fairly mild average annual temperature
             (mid 50°s), its relative humidity is rather low.  The calculated Pearson
             correlations make it difficult to determine the concentration of the prevalent
             compounds as no significant trend was identified with the exception of a negative
             correlation with the carbonyls and the v-component of the wind. High ozone days
             tend to accompany warm temperatures and a ridge aloft over the West.

18.2   Recommendations
       In light of the lessons learned from the 2001 UATMP, a number of recommendations for

future ambient air monitoring are warranted:
       Continue to identify and implement improvements to the sampling and analytical
       methods. The improvements made to the analytical methods prior to the 1999-2000
       UATMP allowed for measurement of ambient air concentrations of 11 compounds that
       were not measured during previous programs. This improvement provides sponsoring
       agencies and a variety of interested parties with important information about air quality
       within their urban areas. Further research is encouraged to identify other method
       improvements that would allow the UATMP to characterize an even wider range of
       components in urban air pollution.

       Continue to strive to develop standard conventions for interpreting air monitoring data.
       The lack of consistent approaches to present and summarize ambient air monitoring data
       complicates or invalidates comparisons between different studies. Additional research
       should be conducted on the feasibility of establishing standard approaches for analyzing
       and reporting air monitoring data.

       Prepare a report characterizing all years of the UATMP and then update it yearly to
       better assess Trends and better understand the nature of U.S. urban air pollution.

       Consider more rigorous study of the impact of automobile emissions on ambient air
       quality using the complete UATMP data set.  Because the UATMP has monitoring sites
       where years of continuous data are collected, a real opportunity exists to evaluate the
       importance and impact of automobile emissions on ambient air quality.  Suggested areas
       of study include:

       1.     Signature Compound Assessment.  Sample data from each site should be
             evaluated to look for signature compounds from mobile sources—that is, species

                                          18-4

-------
       typically associated with only diesel and/or gasoline combustion.  If the
       appropriate compounds are included in the UATMP speciation, sites lacking these
       compounds can be excluded from subsequent analyses.  Desert Research Institute
       can provide a listing of potential signature compounds for mobile sources.

2.     Micro-Climate Assessment.  An assessment is needed of the immediate
       micro-climate for a representative "urban" and "rural" site, to determine a
       reasonable geographic radius of influence. It is absolutely critical to determine a
       rough estimate of the maximum radius of concern (R^) in order to know what
       sources need to be included in the characterization. A value for R^ may be
       determined with relatively little effort using simple dispersion models, such as
       CALINZ4 for urban settings. In these  models R^ would be defined for non-
       reactive species such as CO or PM.  Since most/all of the toxic compounds of
       concern have some level of reactivity, R^ would actually be somewhat less.
       Therefore this method would provide  a conservative estimate for
3 .      Identify Roadways of Concern. All roadways within a distance of R^ should be
       identified for each site. Local area maps are best suited for this purpose.

4.      Parking Lot Characterizations. Several monitoring locations are situated in or
       near parking lots.  Evaporative emissions from parked gasoline vehicles could
       have a very significant impact on the monitors for these sites (depending upon the
       species of concern). Therefore we recommend determining the size of the lots in
       question in terms of number of spaces, as well as an average occupancy rate with
       total vehicles per day (to determine the number of start episodes). The occupancy
       rate should be a 24 hour annual average, and can be established either through
       observation or local "experts" (e.g., the lot operator).  Also, it should be
       determined if the parking is covered or open — covered lots can significantly
       decrease crankcase temperatures and therefore lower evaporative emissions rates.

5.      Site-Specific Information. Additional information could be collected as needed to
       improve the quality of discussions of air quality at specific sites.  For example, for
       the El Paso site the UATMP could obtain a vehicle  count split for US versus
       Mexican vehicles.  Mexican vehicles have dramatically higher pollution rates and
       should be considered separately.  This estimate could be obtained from the  EPA
       or Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Border Liaisons.

Encourage continued participation in the UATMP. Ongoing ambient air monitoring at
fixed locations can provide insight into long-term trends in urban air quality and the
potential for urban air pollution to cause adverse health effects among the general
population. Therefore,  state and local agencies should be strongly encouraged either to
develop and implement their own ambient air monitoring programs or to participate in
future UATMP monitoring efforts.
                                    18-5

-------
19.0   References

ATSDR, 1993. "lexicological Profile for Methylene Chloride." U.S. Department of Health &
       Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.  April,  1993.

ATSDR, 1994. "Toxicological Profile for Carbon Tetrachloride." U.S. Department of Health &
       Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.  September, 1997.

ATSDR, 1995. "Toxicological Profile for 1,1,1-Trichloroethane."  U.S. Department of Health &
       Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.  August,  1995.

ATSDR, 1997a. "Toxicological Profile for Chloromethane." U.S. Department of Health &
       Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.  September, 1997.

ATSDR, 1997b. "Toxicological Profile for Tetrachloroethylene." U.S. Department of Health &
       Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.  September, 1997.

Conner, et al., 1995. "Transportation-Related Volatile Hydrocarbon Source Profiles Measured in
       Atlanta."  Teri L. Conner, William A. Lonneman, Robert L. Seila.  Journal of the Air and
       Waste Management Association, 45: 383-394.  1995.

ERG, 1997.  "1995 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program - Final Report." Eastern Research
       Group.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
       Planning and Standards.  January, 1997.

Fujita, et al., 1994.  "Validation of the Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model Applied to
       Hydrocarbon Source Apportionment in the Southern California Air Quality Study." Eric
       M. Fujita, John G.  Watson, Judith C. Chow, and Zhiqiang Lu. Environmental Science
       and Technology, 28:1633-1649. 1994.

Gilbert, 1987. "Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring." Richard O.
       Gilbert. Van Nostrand Reinhold Publishers.  1987.

Godish, 1997. "Air Quality." Thad Godish. Lewis Publishers.  1997.

Graedel, 1978.  "Chemical Compounds in the Atmosphere." T.E. Graedel. Academic Press.
       1978.

Harnett, 1982.  "Statistical Methods." Donald L. Harnett, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,
       Third Edition.  1982.

Radian, 1990. "1989 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program - Final Report." Radian
       Corporation. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
       Planning and Standards.  September, 1990.
                                         19-1

-------
Radian, 1991. "1990 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program - Final Report." Radian
       Corporation. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
       Planning and Standards.  June, 1991.

Radian, 1996. "1994 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program - Final Report." Radian
       Corporation. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
       Planning and Standards.  June, 1996.

Ramamoorthy and Ramamoorthy, 1997. "Chlorinated Organic Compounds in the Environment:
       Regulatory and Monitoring Assessment."  Sub Ramamoorthy and Sita Ramamoorthy.
       Lewis Publishers. 1997.

Scheff, 1993. "Receptor Modelling of Volatile Organic Compounds. 1. Emission Inventory and
       Validation." Peter A. Scheff and Richard A. Wadden.  Environmental Science and
       Technology, 27: 617-625. 1993.

Seinfeld, 1986. "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution." John H. Seinfeld. John
       Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1986.

USDOC, 1993. "1990 Census of Population and Housing." U.S. Department of Commerce,
       Bureau of the Census.  July, 1993.

USEPA, 1986. "Guideline on Air Quality Models." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
       Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.  July, 1986.

USEPA, 1988. "Data Quality Objectives for the Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (Stages I
       and U)."  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of
       Air Quality Planning and Standards. June, 1988.

USEPA, 1995. "Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reporting Form R and Instructions."
       Revised 1994 Version. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution
       Prevention and Toxics.  March, 1995.

USEPA, 1997. "National Air Pollutant Emission  Trends, 1900 - 1996." U.S. Environmental
       Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and
       Standards.  December, 1997.

USEPA, 1999. "Compendium Method TO-11 A: Determination of Formaldehyde in Ambient
       Air Using Adsorbent Cartridge Followed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography
       (HPLC)." U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency, Center for Environmental Research
       and Information. EPA/625/R-96/010b.  January,  1999.
                                         19-2

-------
USEPA, 1999.  "Compendium Method TO-15: Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
      (VOC) in Ambient Air Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas
      Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
      Center for Environmental Research and Information. EPA/625/R-96/010b.
      January, 1999.

USEPA, 2001.  1999 National Emissions Inventory. United States Environmental Protection
      Agency, Emission Factors and Inventory Group. Downloaded from the internet at:
      ftp. epa. gov/Emi s Inventory/

USEPA, 2002.  "2001 Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) and Speciated Nonmethane
      Organic Compounds (SNMOC) Monitoring Program." July 2002.
                                       19-2

-------
2001  Urban  Air Toxics
Monitoring Program (UATMP)
Final Report
EPA Contract No. 68-D-99-007
Delivery Orders 06/08

Prepared for:
Vickie Presnell and Sharon Nizich
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                     Muscatine, IA ,  Davenport, IA

                Cedar Rapids, IA
               Beulah.ND


        Saltlake City, i)T
 Phoenix, AZ
          EIPaso,TX
  Chester, NJ

  Elizabeth, NJ
  New Brunswick, NJ

Camden, NJ
                               Gulf Port, MS

                                St. Petersburg, FL
                                              Tampa, FL
                                                      San Juan, PR

                                                   Barceloneta, PR
Appendices A-J
October 2002

-------
                       Appendix A




AIRS Site Descriptions for the 2001 UATMP Monitoring Stations

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID :
          04.013-4003
                                       Site Name : SOUTH PHOENIX (SP) - 33 W TAMARISK AVE, PHOENIX
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
Street Address :   33 W TAMARISK AVE, PHOENIX
State:              ARIZONA
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19991001
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: PHOENIX-MESA, AZ
Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
Urban Area:  PHOENIX, AZ
City Population :  789704
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   33.403333
UTM Zone:  12
Accuracy :  .3
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD : S
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -112.12
UTM Northing : 3696370
Datum:   UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
                          City:  PHOENIX
                          County:  MARICOPA
                          Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                          Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                          Last Updated :
AQCR:      PHOENIX-TUCSON
Direct Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : SAN FRANCISCO
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :        395848
Scale:   25000

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                             Met. Site ID :
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 33 WEST TAMARISK AVE
         Monitor Statistics
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 SLAMS                   5       SUPPORTING   MARICOPA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
                                                Agency
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            33 WEST TAMARISK AVE
                     Traffic
                     Count
              Traffic
              Year
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                                                              50000   1995
                                                                                       Road Type
                                                                                       LOCAL ST OR HY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                      Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    04.013.3997
Street Address :   4530 N 17TH AVENUE
State:              ARIZONA
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : INTERPOLATION-MAP
Date Established :  19930701
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: PHOENIX-MESA, AZ
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  PHOENIX, AZ
City Population :  789704
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   33.503667
UTM Zone: 12
Accuracy :  109305.56
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                                       Site Name:  JLG SUPERSITE
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -112.095139
UTM Northing : 3707463
Datum:   NAD27
Vert Accuracy :  1
                                                              Local ID: 16328
                          City:  PHOENIX
                          County:   MARICOPA
                          Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                          Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                          Last Updated:  20020916
AQCR:      PHOENIX-TUCSON
Direct Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : SAN FRANCISCO
Census Tract:
Class 1  Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :        398290
Scale:   24000

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                              Met. Site ID :
                                                              Point/Line/Area:   POINT
         Monitor Statistics                                                                 Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 OTHER                  164     SUPPORTING  ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
 SLAMS                   5
 TRENDS SPECIATIO       199
                                                                             Begin Date
                                                                                               End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            17 TH AVENUE
                     Traffic
                     Count
                                                                 250
              Traffic
              Year
              1993
                                                                              Traffic Volume Source
                                                                                       Road Type
                                                                                       LOCAL ST OR HY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                    Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    04.021.5001                   Site Name:  QUEEN VALLEY
Street Address :   10 S QUEEN ANN QUEEN VALLEY
State :              ARIZONA             Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  GPS CODE (PSEUDO RANGE) PRECISE POSITION
Date Established :  20010518
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA:  PHOENIX-MESA, AZ
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  PHOENIX, AZ
City Population :  1
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   33.293659
UTM Zone: 12
Accuracy : 2.28
Vertical Measure (m):    634.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD :
Block Group  :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -111.285724
UTM Northing :  3683682
Datum:  NAD27
Vert Accuracy :  1
                                                                                                                     Local ID : 16394
City:  NOT IN A CITY
County:  PINAL
Location Setting :   RURAL
Land Use :  DESERT
Last Updated:  20020916

AQCR:     PHOENIX-TUCSON
Direct  Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : SAN FRANCISCO
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :        473413
Scale:  24000

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                             Met. Site ID :
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 MEASURES MORNING DOWNWIND BACKGROUND-AFTERNOON FAR DOWNWIND LOTS OF GNATS - JUNE 2001
 SONORAN DESERT-HILLTOP 1.5 Ml S QUEEN VALLEY - PAMS TYPES 1 AND 4
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
 SLAMS                  64      SUPPORTING  ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            QUEEN ANN
                     Traffic
                     Count
              Traffic
              Year
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                         200   2001
                                                                                      Road Type
                                                                                      LOCAL ST OR HY
                                                           Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
                                                       Air Quality Subsystem
                                                             SITE DESCRIPTION
                                       Site Name :
                                       Zip Code :
                                       Date Terminated :
                                       HQEval. Date: 19830825
                                       CMSA : DENVER-BOULDER-GREELEY.CO
                                       Dist to Met. Site (m):
                                       Dir. to CBD : N
                                       Block Group :
                                          Dist. to City (km) :
Site ID:    08-031-0002
Street Address :  2105 BROADWAY - CAMP
State :             COLORADO
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19650101
Regional Eval. Date : 19810612
MSA :  DENVER, CO
Type Met Site:
Urban Area :   DENVER, CO
City Population : 492365
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude:   39.751111
UTMZone:  13
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    1,591.0
Vert Datum :  UNKNOWN

 HSite Comments
 —ACTIVE AS Of 4-?-73 STATION ACTIVE 1-1-7
           Monitor Statistics
  Monitor Type          ft oi Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
  HAMS                  5      SUPPORTING  COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIflONMENT
  SDTHER                 .MB.
  =SLAMS                  '9
                                       Site Longitude :  -104.987222
                                       UTM Northing :  4399952
                                       Datum :   UNKNOWN
                                       Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                      Local ID
                                                                   City:  DENVER
                                                                   County:   DENVER
                                                                   Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                                                                   Land Use : COMMERCIAL
                                                                   Last Updated :
            AQCR :     METROPOLITAN DENVER
            Direct Met Site :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : DENVER
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone : MOUNTAIN
            UTM Easting :        501084
            Scale:  0

            Vert Method :  UNKNOWN
                                                                                                      Met. Site ID :
                                                                                                      Point/Line/Area :  POINT
                                                                         Agency
                                                                                                    Begin Date
                                                                                                                                 End Dale
     Road
    Number
Road Name
BROADWAY
21 ST^STREET
CHAMPA
STOUT
CURTIS
                                                          Traffic
                                                          Count
Traffic
 Year
Traffic Volume Source
                                                              17200   1995
                                                               1000   1995
                                                              10000   1995
                                                               8000   1995
                                                               8000   1995
Road Type
MAJ ST OR HY
LOCAL ST OR HY
MAJ ST OR HY
MAJ ST OR HY
THRU ST OR HY
Compass
Sector
E
SW
NW
SE
NW

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
Site ID:    08.077 -.0003                   Site Name :
Street Address :   MESA CO HLTH DEPT BLDG 515 PATTERSON RD.
State :             COLORADO            Zip Code :
Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19640101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: GRAND JUNCTION, CO
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  GRAND JUNCTION, CO
City Population :  27956
Census Block  :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :    39.090833
UTM Zone: 12
Accuracy :  15.18
Vertical Measure (m):    1,420.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -108.563889
UTM Northing : 4329500
Datum:  NAD27
Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
City:  GRAND JUNCTION
County:  MESA
Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR:     GRAND MESA
Direct  Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : DENVER
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone:  MOUNTAIN
UTM Easting:        710700
Scale:  24000

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                             Met. Site ID :
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 UATMP PILOT PROJECT SITE BEGAN IM MAY 2001
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 OTHER                  11      SUPPORTING   COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
 SLAMS                  76
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date
    Road
   Number    Road Name
     1      PATTERSON RD
                     Traffic
                     Count
              Traffic
              Year   Traffic Volume Source
                                                              10000
                                                                                       Road Type
                                                                                       MAJ ST OR HY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                             Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    08. 077-.0016
Street Address :  924 FOURTH AVE.
State:             COLORADO
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  20010507
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: GRAND JUNCTION, CO
Type Met Site: OTHER AIRS SITE
Urban Area:  GRAND JUNCTION, CO
City Population :  27956
Census Block  :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :    39.058889
UTM Zone: 12
Accuracy :  15.18
Vertical Measure (m):    1,395.0
Vert Datum:  UNKNOWN
                           Site Name :  MESA COUNTY TRAFFIC SERVICES BUILDING
                                                                      City: GRAND JUNCTION
                                                                                                                     Local ID: STOCKER
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQ Eval. Date :
                           CMSA:
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :

                           Dir. toCBD : SE
                           Block Group :
  2100
Dist. to City (km):  1
                           Site Longitude :   -108.554444
                           UTM Northing :  4325950
                           Datum:  NAD27
                           Vert Accuracy :
                          County:  MESA
                          Location Setting :   URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                          Land Use : INDUSTRIAL
                          Last Updated :
            AQCR:      GRAND MESA
            Direct Met Site :  N
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : DENVER
            Census Tract:
            Class 1  Area :
            Time Zone:  MOUNTAIN
            UTM Easting:        711610
            Scale:   24000

            Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                             Met. Site ID: 1892
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 UATMP PILOT PROJECT SITE
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 OTHER                   2       SUPPORTING   COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
                                                                                                       Begin Date
                                                                                                       20010507
                                                                             End Date
                                                                             20020430
    Road
   Number
     1
     2
Road Name
4TH AVE.
9TH ST.
                                                Traffic
                                                Count
        200
       2000
Traffic
 Year
 2001
 2001
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
Road Type
LOCAL ST OR HY
THRUST OR HY
Compass
 Sector
   N
   W

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
Site ID:    12.057 -.0081                   Site Name :
Street Address :   E.G. SIMMONS COUNTY PARK
State :              FLORIDA             Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19730101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-
                                            Air  Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                    Oct. 26, 2002
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQ Eval. Date :
                           CMSA:
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :
      CLEARWATER, FL
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :   TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL
City Population :  271523                   Dir. to CBD :
Census Block :                           Block Group :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   27.739722                  Site Longitude
UTMZone: 17                           UTM Northing :  3069035
Accuracy : 0                             Datum :  UNKNOWN
Vertical Measure (m):    4.0                Vert Accuracy :
Vert Datum:  UNKNOWN
                                           Dist. to City (km):
                                         -82.465278
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
                   City:  TAMPA
                   County:   HILLSBOROUGH
                   Location Setting :  UNKNOWN
                   Land Use :  UNKNOWN
                   Last Updated :

                   AQCR :     WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA
                   Direct Met Site :
                   Local Region :
                   EPA Region : ATLANTA
                   Census Tract:
                   Class 1 Area :
                   Time Zone : EASTERN
                   UTM Easting :        355561
                   Scale:   0

                   Vert Method :  UNKNOWN
Met. Site ID :
                                                                                                        Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 NAMS CONTINUOUS OZONE SITE UP WIND OF TAMPA
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
 OTHER                   1       SUPPORTING  HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION
 SLAMS                   2
                                                                                                       Begin Date
                                                                                                                        End Date
    Road
   Number
     1
     2
Road Name
19THAVE
UNKNOWN
                                                Traffic
                                                Count
       Traffic
        Year
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
 1700
17000
                        Compass
        Road Type         Sector
        LOCAL ST OR HY    UNK
        MAJ ST OR HY      UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    12.057-1065
Street Address :   5121 GANDY BLVD
State:              FLORIDA
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19890901
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-
                                       Site Name :
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
      CLEARWATER, FL
Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
Urban Area :  TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL
City Population :  271523                   Dir. to CBD : SW
Census Block :                           Block Group :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   27.892222                 Site Longitude :   -82.538611
UTMZone:  17                           UTM Northing : 3086060
Accuracy :  0                             Datum :   UNKNOWN
Vertical Measure (m):    3.0                Vert Accuracy :
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                 Dist. to City (km):   4
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
City:  TAMPA
County:   HILLSBOROUGH
Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
Land Use : COMMERCIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA
Direct  Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : ATLANTA
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  EASTERN
UTM Easting :        348560
Scale:  0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
Met. Site ID :
                                                                              Point/Line/Area:  POINT
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   2       SUPPORTING   HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION
 OTHER                   1
 SLAMS                   2
                                                                            Begin Date
Road
Number
1
2
3
4
Road Name
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
                                                            Traffic
                                                            Count
                               Traffic
                               Year
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                                                              30400
                                                              15000
                                                              21000
                                                              15000
                                                                                              End Date
Road Type
THRU STOR HY
THRU STOR HY
MAJ ST OR HY
MAJ ST OR HY
Compass
Sector
UNK
UNK
UNK
UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                                         Air Quality Subsystem
                                                               SITE DESCRIPTION
Site ID:    12.057-1075                   Site Name : WHITEWAY DRIVE TAMPA
Street Address :   6700 WHITEWAY DRIVE TAMPA
State :              FLORIDA             Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  GPS CODE (PSEUDO RANGE) PRECISE POSITION
Date Established :  19990101                Date Terminated :
Regional Eval. Date :                       HQ Eval. Date :
MSA : TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-            CMSA :
                                       Dist to Met. Site (m) :
      CLEARWATER, FL
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :   TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL
City Population :  271523                   Dir. to CBD : SW
                                                        Dist. to City (km):   9
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   28.05
UTM Zone:  17
Accuracy : 128.74
Vertical Measure (m):    10.0
Vert Datum:  UNKNOWN
                                       Block Group :
                                       Site Longitude :   -82.378056
                                       UTM Northing :  3103340
                                       Datum:  UNKNOWN
                                       Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
                                                                                                                     Local ID: 4360075G01
                                                                                  City: TAMPA
                                                                                  County:  HILLSBOROUGH
                                                                                  Location Setting :   URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                                                                                  Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                                                                                  Last Updated :
                      AQCR :      WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA
                      Direct Met Site :
                      Local Region :
                      EPA Region : ATLANTA
                      Census Tract:
                      Class 1 Area :
                      Time Zone :  EASTERN
                      UTM Easting :       364560
                      Scale:  24000

                      Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                               Met. Site ID :
                                               Point/Line/Area:  POINT
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 SLAMS                  10      SUPPORTING   HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION
 TRENDS SPECIATIO       132
                                                                                                                   Begin Date
                                                                                                                                     End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            113TH AVE
Traffic
Count
                                                               1055
Traffic
 Year
 1999
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
Road Type
LOCAL ST OR HY
Compass
 Sector

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                    Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    12.103-0018
Street Address :   7200-22 AVENUE NORTH
State:              FLORIDA
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19750101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-
                                       Site Name :
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date : 19820616
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
      CLEARWATER, FL
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :   TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL
City Population :  238647                   Dir. to CBD : SE
Census Block :                           Block Group :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude  :   27.785556                  Site Longitude :
UTMZone:  17                           UTM Northing :  3074491
Accuracy : 0                             Datum :  UNKNOWN
Vertical Measure (m):    5.0                Vert Accuracy :
Vert Datum:  UNKNOWN
                 Dist. to City (km):   11
               -82.74
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
City:  ST PETERSBURG
County:  PINELLAS
Location  Setting :   SUBURBAN
Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA
Direct  Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : ATLANTA
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  EASTERN
UTM Easting :       328563
Scale:   0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
Met. Site ID :
                                                                              Point/Line/Area:   POINT
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
 NAMS                   3       SUPPORTING  PINELLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
 OTHER                  77
 SLAMS                  15
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                                                                            Begin Date
Road
Number
1
2
3
4
5
Road Name
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
Traffic
Count
2000
5000
10000
32000
2000
Traffic
Year
                                                                                              End Date
Road Type
MAJ ST OR HY
THRU STOR HY
THRU STOR HY
FREEWAY
LOCAL ST OR HY
Compass
Sector
UNK
UNK
UNK
UNK
UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                                         Air Quality Subsystem
                                                               SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    12.103-1008                   Site Name : DUNEDIN HIGHLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL
Street Address :   896 UNION STREET DUNEDIN
State :              FLORIDA             Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  GPS CODE (PSEUDO RANGE) PRECISE POSITION
Date Established :  19990127                Date Terminated :
Regional Eval. Date :                       HQ Eval. Date :
MSA : TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-            CMSA :
                                       Dist to Met. Site (m) :  12400
      CLEARWATER, FL
Type Met Site:  OTHER AIRS SITE
Urban Area :   TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL
City Population :  30203                    Dir. to CBD : SE
Census Block :                           Block Group :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude  :   28                       Site Longitude :
UTMZone:  17                           UTM Northing :  3098290
Accuracy: 128.74                         Datum:  UNKNOWN
Vertical Measure (m):    8.0                Vert Accuracy :
Vert Datum:  UNKNOWN
                                                        Dist. to City (km):  2
                                                      -82.776389
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
                      City: DUNEDIN
                      County:  PINELLAS
                      Location Setting :   SUBURBAN
                      Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                      Last Updated :

                      AQCR :      WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA
                      Direct Met Site :  NE
                      Local Region :
                      EPA Region : ATLANTA
                      Census Tract:
                      Class 1 Area :
                      Time Zone :  EASTERN
                      UTM Easting :       325320
                      Scale:  24000

                      Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                               Met. Site ID : 3051
                                                                                                                     Point/Line/Area:  POINT
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
 SLAMS                  10      SUPPORTING  PINELLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
                                                                                                                   Begin Date
                                                                                                                                     End Date
    Road
   Number
     1
     2
            Road Name
            PATRICIA
            UNION
Traffic
Count
  11515
   4766
Traffic
 Year
 1997
 1997
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
Road Type
THRUST OR HY
LOCAL ST OR HY
Compass
 Sector
   E
   S

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
Site ID :    12.103.5002                   Site Name :
Street Address :  COUNTY ROAD 77 BOOKER CK PARK
State :              FLORIDA             Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19770101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
      CLEARWATER, FL
Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
Urban Area :   TAMPA-ST. PETERSBURG-CLEARWATER, FL
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date : 19820617
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
City Population :  13251
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   28.09
UTM Zone:  17
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    2.0
Vert Datum:  UNKNOWN
Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -82.700833
UTM Northing :  3108174
Datum:  UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                                                    Oct. 26, 2002
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
City :  TARPON SPRINGS
County:  PINELLAS
Location Setting :   RURAL
Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA
Direct  Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : ATLANTA
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  EASTERN
UTM Easting :       332880
Scale:  0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                             Met. Site ID :
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 D URBAN SCALE-MAX NEIGHBORHOOD EXPOSURE
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
 NAMS                   1       SUPPORTING  PINELLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
 SLAMS                   4
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            EAST LAKE ROAD
                     Traffic
                     Count
              Traffic
              Year
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                                                              14000   1990
                                                                                      Road Type
                                                                                      THRUST OR HY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
v>EPA
  United States
  Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    19.045-0021                  Site Name : CLINTON RAINBOW PARK
 Street Address :   50 FT WEST OF ROOSEVELT STREET
 State:               IOWA
 Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
 Date Established :  19981210
 Regional Eval. Date :
 MSA : NOT IN AN MSA
 Type Met Site :
 Urban Area :  NOT IN AN URBAN AREA
 City Population :  32828
 Census Block :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :    41.874972
 UTMZone: 15
 Accuracy :  1
 Vertical Measure (m):   0.0
 Vert Datum : MEAN SEA-LEVEL
                         Zip Code:
                         Date Terminated :
                         HQ Eval. Date :
                         CMSA:
                         Dist to Met. Site (m):

                         Dir. to CBD :
                         Block Group  :
Dist. to City (km):
                         Site Longitude:   -90.177444
                         UTM Northing :  4639507
                         Datum :  NAD27
                         Vert Accuracy :  1
                                              Local ID:
           City:  CLINTON
           County :  CLINTON
           Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
           Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
           Last Updated :  20020813

           AQCR  :     METROPOLITAN QUAD CITIES
           Direct Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
           Local Region :
           EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
           Census Tract:
           Class 1 Area :
           Time Zone :
           UTM Easting :       734251
           Scale:  24000                       Point/Line/Area:  POINT

           Vert Method :   TOPOGRAPHIC MAP INTERPOLATION
       3i
-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    19.113-0037
Street Address :   1599 WENIG RD NE
State:               IOWA
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : GPS CODE (PSEUDO RANGE) PRECISE POSITION
Site Name : ARMY RESERVE CENTER ROOF- CORE MONITORING SITE
                                           City:  CEDAR RAPIDS
                                                                                                                      Local ID :
Zip Code :
Date Established :  19990101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA :  CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :  CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
City Population :  110243
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   42.008333
UTM Zone:  15
Accuracy :  1.09
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -91.678611
UTM Northing : 4651332
Datum:   UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
                          County:   LINN
                          Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                          Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                          Last Updated :
AQCR :      NORTHEAST IOWA
Direct Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
Census Tract:
Class 1  Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :       609424
Scale:   0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                              Met. Site ID :
                                                              Point/Line/Area:   POINT
         Monitor Statistics
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 OTHER                  306      SUPPORTING  LINN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
 SLAMS                  77
                                                Agency
                                                                             Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            WENIG ROAD NE
                     Traffic
                     Count
              Traffic
              Year
                                                                              Traffic Volume Source
                                                                1500    1994
                                                                                       Road Type
                                                                                       LOCAL ST OR HY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
vxEPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    19-113-0039
 Street Address :  4400 6TH ST SW
 State:                IOWA
 Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  GPS CODE (PSEUDO RANGE) PRECISE POSITION
                         Site Name :  HAWKEYE DOWNS SOUTHWEST CORNER
                                                                  City:  CEDAR RAPIDS
                                                            Local ID :
                         Zip Code :
 Date Established :  20000601
 Regional Eval. Date :
 MSA : CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
 Type Met Site :
 Urban Area :  CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
 City Population :  110243
 Census Block :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :   41.934167
 UTMZone: 15
 Accuracy : 1.09
 Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
 Vert Datum :  UNKNOWN
                         Date Terminated :
                         HQ Eval. Date :
                         CMSA :
                         Dist to Met. Site (m):

                         Dir. to CBD :
                         Block Group  :
Dist. to City (km):
                         Site Longitude :   -91.6825
                         UTM Northing :  4643086
                         Datum :  UNKNOWN
                         Vert Accuracy :
                         County :  LINN
                         Location Setting :   URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                         Land Use: INDUSTRIAL
                         Last Updated :
           AQCR :      NORTHEAST IOWA
           Direct Met Site :
           Local Region :
           EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
           Census Tract:
           Class 1 Area :
           Time Zone :
           UTM Easting :       609222
           Scale:  0

           Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                            Met. Site ID
                                                            Point/Line/Area :  POINT
            Monitor Statistics
  """"vtoniior Type          # of Monitors  Rote         Agency Desc
  OTHER                 306      SUPPORTING  LINN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
  SLAMS                  1
      ftoad
     Number
Road Name
6TH ST SW
     Traffic
     Count
                                                              1 5000
Traffic
 Year
 1999
                                                                         Agency
                                                                                                    Begin Dale
                                                                           End Dale
                                                                            Traffic Volume Source
Road Type
MfiJ ST OR HY
Compass
 Sector

-------
vxEPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID :    19.139- 0020                  Site Name :
 Street Address :  OREGON ST. AND EARL AVENUE
                                                                                                     Local ID
 State:              IOWA
 Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
 Date Established :   19891211
 Regional Eval. Date:
 MSA : NOT IN AN MSA
 Type  Met Site : ON-SITE MET EQUIP
 Urban Area :  NOT IN AN URBAN AREA
 City Population : 23467
 Census Block :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :   41.407778
 UTM Zone: 15
 Accuracy : 0
 Vertical Measure (m):    544.0
 Vert Datum : UNKNOWN
                          Zip Code :
                          Date Terminated :
                          HQ Eval. Date :
                          CMSA:
                          Dist to Met. Site (m):

                         is^pir. to CBD :
                          felock Group :
Dist. to City (km)
                          Site Longitude :   -91.0625
                          UTM Northing : 4585625
                          Datum :   UNKNOWN
                         TjVert Accuracy:
                         City:  MUSCATINE
                         County :  MUSCATINE
                         Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
                         Land Use: INDUSTRIAL
                         Last Updated :
                         AQCR :
                                    METROPOLITAN QUAD CITIES
          Direct Met Site :
          Local Region :
          EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
          Census Tract:
          Class 1 Area :
          Time Zone :  CENTRAL
          UTM Easting :       661947
          Scale:  0

          Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                           Met. Site ID :
                                                           Point/Line/Area:   POINT
       ~iln Comments
  MUSSER PARK

           Monitor Statistics
  •»loni"or Type          if ol Monitors  Role
  OTHER                 307     SUPPORTING
  SLAMS                  5
                                Agency Oesc
                               UNIVERSITY HYGENIC LABORATORY
                                                                         Agency
                                                          Begin Date
                                                                                                                     End Date
        ftoad
       Number
   flood Name
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
      Traffic
      Court
        800
       2000
Traffic
 Year
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                                                                                                                           Road Type
                                                                                                                          MAJ ST OR HY
                                                                                                                          ARTERIAL
Compass
 Sector
  UNK
  UNK

-------
vvEPA
               United States
               Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    19-153-0030                  Site Name :  AIR TOXICS SAMPLER ERG LOCATED ON TOP OF BUILDING IN
 Street Address :   1907 CARPENTER, DES MOINES IOWA    ENCLOSURE                               ,.„,.,„
                                                                                 City : ubo MUlNEo
                                       Zip Code :
                                                                                                                  Local ID
State :               IOWA
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  INTERPOLATION-MAP
Date Established :  20001001
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : DES MOINES, IA
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :   DES MOINES, IA
City Population :  191003
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   41.603056
UTMZone: 15
Accuracy : 109305.56
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum:  UNKNOWN
                                       Date Terminated :
                                       HQ Eval. Date :
                                       CMSA:
                                       Dist to Met. Site (m):

                                       Dir. to CBD :
                                       Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
                                       Site Longitude :  -93.643056
                                       UTM Northing :  4605700
                                       Datum :  NAD27
                                       Vert Accuracy :
                         County :  POLK
                         Location Setting :   URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                         Land Use : COMMERCIAL
                         Last Updated :
            AQCR :      SOUTH CENTRAL IOWA
            Direct Met Site :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone :
            UTM Easting :       446419
            Scale:  24000

            Vert Method •   UNKNOWN
                                                            Met. Site ID :
                                                            Point/Line/Area   POINT
           Monitor Statistics
  iWwiilor Type          -< of Monitors  Role         Agency Oesc
  -CITHER                 aoe      SUPPORTING  PGLK COUNTY PHYSICAI PLANNING
  -SLAMS                  10
                          69
                                                                                     Agency
                                                                                                                Begin Dale
                                                                           End Dale
     Road
    Number
            Road Name
            CARPENTER
    Traffic
    Count
Traffic
 Year
                                                                            Traffic Volume Source
                                                              12400   1996
                                                                    Road Type
                                                                    LOCAL ST OR HY
Compass
 Sector

-------
>>EPA
    United States
    Environmental Protection Agency
                                                       Air Quality Subsystem
                                                             SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    19.163-0015
 Street Address :   10TH ST. AND VINE
 State :                IOWA
 Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
 Date Established :  19820301
 Regional Eval. Date : 19900523
 MSA :  DAVENPORT-MOLINE-ROCK ISLAND,
       IA-IL
 Type Met Site :
 Urban Area :   DAVENPORT-ROCK ISLAND-MOLINE, IA-IL
                          Site Name: DAVENPORT 10TH&VINE
                          Zip Code :
                          Date Terminated :
                          HQ Eval. Date: 19900523
                          CMSA:
                          Dist to Met. Site (m):
City Population :   103264
Census Block :
Congressional District:      *,
Site Latitude :   41.53 	,.*
                        **
UTM Zone: 15
Accuracy : 1
Vertical Measure (m):    213.0
Vert Datum :  MEAN SEA-LEVEL
                                       Dir. to CBD : NW
                                       Block Group :
                                           Dist. to City (km):  1
                                       Site Longitude:  -90.58Z5
                                       UTM Northing : 4600192
                                       Datum :   NAD27
                                       Vert Accuracy  : 1
                                              Local ID :
            City :  DAVENPORT
            County :  SCOTT
            Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
            Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
            Last Updated : 20020813

            AQCR :      METROPOLITAN QUAD CITIES
            Direct Met Site :                      Met. Site ID
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :              s
            Time Zone:  CENTRAL 	..'C--«k- .•&.
            UTM Easting :       701274    *" *1; * ^
            Scale:  0                     •'-  'toint/Line/Area:  POINT

            Vert Method :  TOPOGRAPHIC MAP INTERPOLATION
 Site Comments
 DAVENPORT 10TH & VINE
 OPERATED BY UHL  MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION SITE STARTED
 OPERATION FEB. 28,1982

         Monitor Statistics
 Wniiridi Typo          (f ol Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
 'JAMS                   -       SUPPORTING  UNIVERSITY HV'GENIC LABORATORY
 DIMEH                 306
 SLAMS                 S2
                                                                                      Agency
                                                                                                                 Begin Dale
                                                                                                                      End Gale
    Road
   Number
Road Name
UNKNOWN
                                                          Traffic
                                                          Count
Traffic
 Year
                                                                            Traffic Volume Source
                                                               1000
                                                                                                                          Road Type
                                                                                                                          LOCAL ST OR HY
Compass
 Sector
  UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                      Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID :
          26.125-0010
                                       Site Name :  338 FEET NORTH TO I-696 FREEWAY
Street Address :   27542 NORTHWESTERN HWY
State:             MICHIGAN
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  20010301
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: DETROIT, Ml
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  DETROIT, Ml
City Population :  75568
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   42.490278
UTM Zone:  17
Accuracy :  15.18
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA : DETROIT-A. ARBOR-FLINT, Ml
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -83.28
UTM Northing : 4706518
Datum:   UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
                                    Local ID :
City:  SOUTHFIELD
County:   OAKLAND
Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
Land Use : MOBILE
Last Updated :

AQCR :     METROPOLITAN DETROIT-PORT HURON
Direct Met Site :                        Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : CHICAGO
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting:        312623
Scale:  0                           Point/Line/Area:   POINT

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
         Monitor Statistics                                                                 Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 OTHER                  68      SUPPORTING  MICHIGAN DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-AIR QUALITY DIVISION
 TRENDS SPECIATIO       64
                                                                             Begin Date
                                                                                               End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            NORTHWESTERN HWY
                     Traffic
                     Count
                       100000
              Traffic
               Year
               1990
                                                                              Traffic Volume Source
                                            Road Type
                                            FREEWAY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    26.163.D001
Street Address :   14700 GODDARD
State:             MICHIGAN
Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19710101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: DETROIT, Ml
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  DETROIT, Ml
City Population :  34196
Census Block  :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :    42.228333
UTM Zone: 17
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    181.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                                       Site Name :
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date : 19800515
CMSA :  DETROIT-A. ARBOR-FLINT, Ml
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
Dir. to CBD : SW
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):  18
Site Longitude :   -83.209167
UTM Northing : 4677265
Datum:   UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
City :  ALLEN PARK
County: WAYNE
Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
Land Use : COMMERCIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     METROPOLITAN DETROIT-PORT HURON
Direct  Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : CHICAGO
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  EASTERN
UTM Easting:        317699
Scale:  0                           Point/Line/Area:  POINT

Vert Method :  UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 ALLEN PARK NO2 DISCONTINUED 6-84
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   1       SUPPORTING   WAYNE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
 OTHER                  96
 SLAMS                   8
 TRENDS SPECIATIO       65
 UNKNOWN                1
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            UNKNOWN
                     Traffic
                     Count
              Traffic
              Year
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                                                              60000
                                                                                       Road Type
                                                                                       FREEWAY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector
                                                              UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                             Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    26.163.D005
Street Address :   315 GENESEE
State:             MICHIGAN
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19710101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: DETROIT, Ml
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  DETROIT, Ml
City Population :  12912
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   42.267222
UTM Zone: 17
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    177.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                                       Site Name :
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQ Eval. Date :
                           CMSA :  DETROIT-A. ARBOR-FLINT, Ml
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :
                           Dir. to CBD :
                           Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
                           Site Longitude :   -83.132222
                           UTM Northing :  4681450
                           Datum:  UNKNOWN
                           Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                                      Local ID :
            City:  RIVER ROUGE
            County: WAYNE
            Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
            Land Use :  INDUSTRIAL
            Last Updated :

            AQCR :     METROPOLITAN DETROIT-PORT HURON
            Direct Met Site :                        Met. Site ID :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : CHICAGO
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone : EASTERN
            UTM Easting :        324150
            Scale:  0                            Point/Line/Area:   POINT

            Vert Method :  UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 ACTIVE 10/70

         Monitor Statistics                                                                 Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   1       SUPPORTING  WAYNE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
 OTHER                 81
 SLAMS                  1
 UNKNOWN                1
                                                                                                        Begin Date
                                                                                                                         End Date
    Road
   Number
Road Name
UNKNOWN
    Traffic
    Count
Traffic
 Year
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
                                                                500
                Compass
Road Type         Sector
LOCAL ST OR HY    UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                             Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    26.163.D015
Street Address :   6921 WEST FORT
State:             MICHIGAN
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19710101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: DETROIT, Ml
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  DETROIT, Ml
City Population :  1203339
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   42.304167
UTM Zone: 17
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    180.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                                       Site Name :
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQ Eval. Date : 19800515
                           CMSA :  DETROIT-A. ARBOR-FLINT, Ml
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :
                           Dir. to CBD : SW
                           Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):  6
                           Site Longitude :   -83.107222
                           UTM Northing :  4685500
                           Datum:  UNKNOWN
                           Vert Accuracy :
                                                Local ID :
            City:  DETROIT
            County: WAYNE
            Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
            Land Use : COMMERCIAL
            Last Updated :

            AQCR :     METROPOLITAN DETROIT-PORT HURON
            Direct Met Site :                        Met. Site ID :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : CHICAGO
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone :  EASTERN
            UTM Easting :        326300
            Scale:  0                            Point/Line/Area:  POINT

            Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 NAMS/SLAMS/NFAN ACTIVE 10/70

         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   2      SUPPORTING  WAYNE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
 OTHER                  121
 SLAMS                   5
 UNKNOWN                7
                                                                                                       Begin Date
                                                                                                                         End Date
    Road
   Number
     1
     2
Road Name
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
    Traffic
    Count
Traffic
 Year
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
        1000
       17437
                Compass
Road Type         Sector
LOCAL ST OR HY    UNK
MAJ ST OR HY       UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                            Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID :    26.163-0019                   Site Name :
Street Address :  11600 EAST SEVEN MILE ROAD
State:             MICHIGAN
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19710101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: DETROIT, Ml
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  DETROIT, Ml
City Population :  1203339
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :    42.430833
UTM Zone: 17
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    192.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQEval. Date : 19810515
                           CMSA : DETROIT-A. ARBOR-FLINT, Ml
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :
                           Dir.toCBD:NE
                           Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):  12
                           Site Longitude :   -83.000833
                           UTM Northing :  4699350
                           Datum:   UNKNOWN
                           Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
            City:  DETROIT
            County: WAYNE
            Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
            Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
            Last Updated :

            AQCR :     METROPOLITAN DETROIT-PORT HURON
            Direct Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : CHICAGO
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone :  EASTERN
            UTM Easting :        335400
            Scale:  0                           Point/Line/Area:  POINT

            Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 OSBORN SCHOOL ACTIVE 10/70

         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   3       SUPPORTING   WAYNE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
 OTHER                 276
 SLAMS                  80
 UNKNOWN                1
                                                                                                       Begin Date
                                                                                                                         End Date
    Road
   Number
     1
     2
     3
Road Name
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
    Traffic
    Count
Traffic
 Year
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
        999
        1000
        5000
                Compass
Road Type         Sector
LOCAL ST OR HY    UNK
LOCAL ST OR HY    UNK
THRUST OR HY     UNK

-------
               United States
               Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                    Oct. 26, 2002
                                      Site Name :
                                      Zip Code :
                                      Date Terminated :
                                      HQ Eval. Date :
                                      CMSA : DETROIT-A. ARBOR-FLINT, Ml
                                      Dist to Met. Site (m) :
                                      Dir. to CBD :
                                      Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site ID:    26.163.D027
Street Address :   7701 W. JEFFERSON
State:             MICHIGAN
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19820401
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: DETROIT, Ml
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  DETROIT, Ml
City Population :  1203339
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   42.292222
UTM Zone: 17
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    178.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN

 Site Comments
 STARTED 4/82
        Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
OTHER                  81      SUPPORTING   WAYNE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
                                      Site Longitude :   -83.106944
                                      UTM Northing : 4684150
                                      Datum:   UNKNOWN
                                      Vert Accuracy :
                                   Local ID :
City:  DETROIT
County: WAYNE
Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
Land Use : INDUSTRIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     METROPOLITAN DETROIT-PORT HURON
Direct  Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : CHICAGO
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  EASTERN
UTM Easting :        326300
Scale:  0                           Point/Line/Area:  POINT

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                            Begin Date
                                                                             End Date

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                             Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    26.163.D033
Street Address :   2842 WYOMING
State:             MICHIGAN
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19900601
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: DETROIT, Ml
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  DETROIT, Ml
City Population :  90660
Census Block  :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :    42.3075
UTM Zone: 17
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                           Site Name : PROPERTY OWNED BY DEARBORN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
                                                                      City: DEARBORN
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQ Eval. Date :
                           CMSA :  DETROIT-A. ARBOR-FLINT, Ml
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :
                           Dir. to CBD :
                           Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
                           Site Longitude :   -83.15
                           UTM Northing :  4685950
                           Datum:  UNKNOWN
                           Vert Accuracy :
            County: WAYNE
            Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
            Land Use : INDUSTRIAL
            Last Updated :

            AQCR :      METROPOLITAN DETROIT-PORT HURON
            Direct Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : CHICAGO
            Census Tract:
            Class 1  Area :
            Time Zone :
            UTM Easting :        322800
            Scale:  0                           Point/Line/Area:  POINT

            Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 REPLACES SITE 32 AFTER RELOCATION
         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   1       SUPPORTING   WAYNE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
 OTHER                  162
 SLAMS                  71
                                                                                                       Begin Date
                                                                                                                         End Date
    Road
   Number
Road Name
WYOMING
    Traffic
    Count
                                                              12791
Traffic
 Year
 1990
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
Compass
 Sector
Road Type
LOCAL ST OR HY      W

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                      Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    28. 047-.0008
Street Address :  47 MAPLE STREET
State:            MISSISSIPPI
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  INTERPOLATION-MAP
Date Established :  19990401
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :   BILOXI-GULFPORT, MS
City Population :  39676
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   30.390139
UTM Zone: 16
Accuracy :  0
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN

 Site Comments
 PM 2.5 TREND/SPECIATION SITE
Site Name : BEHIND HARRISON COUNTY YOUTH COURT
                                           City:  GULFPORT
Zip Code :                                   County :   HARRISON
                                           Location Setting :  RURAL
                                           Land Use : COMMERCIAL
                                           Last Updated :
                                                                                                                      Local ID :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
                 Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -89.049722
UTM Northing : 3363603
Datum:   UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
AQCR :      MOBILE-PENSACOLA-PANAMA CITY-SOUTHERN
           MISSISSIPPI
Direct Met Site :                        Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : ATLANTA
Census Tract:
Class 1  Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :        303062
Scale:   24000

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                                               Point/Line/Area:   POINT
         Monitor Statistics
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 SLAMS                  12      SUPPORTING  MISSISSIPPI DEQ, OFFICE OF POLLUTION
 TRENDS SPECIATIO       65
                                                Agency
                                                                             Begin Date
                                                                                               End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            PASS ROAD
                     Traffic
                     Count
                               Traffic
                               Year
                                                                              Traffic Volume Source
                                                               17000    1995
                                                                                       Road Type
                                                                                       MAJ ST OR HY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                             Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    28.049.D010
Street Address :   5810 RIDGEWOOD RD
State:             MISSISSIPPI
Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19750401
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : JACKSON, MS
Type Met Site : ON-SITE MET EQUIP
Urban Area :  JACKSON, MS
City Population :  202895
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   32.385583
UTM Zone: 15
Accuracy :  0
Vertical Measure (m):    90.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                                       Site Name :
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQ Eval. Date :
                           CMSA:
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :

                           Dir. to CBD :
                           Block Group  :
Dist. to City (km):
                           Site Longitude :   -90.140917
                           UTM Northing :  3586580
                           Datum:  UNKNOWN
                           Vert Accuracy :
                                   Local ID :
City:  JACKSON
County:   HINDS
Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
Land Use : COMMERCIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     MOBILE-PENSACOLA-PANAMA CITY-SOUTHERN
           MISSISSIPPI
Direct Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : ATLANTA
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  CENTRAL
UTM Easting :        768981
Scale:  0
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
                                                                                  Vert Method :
                                                                                               UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 JACKSON MUNICIPAL FIRE STATION #19 NR THE INTERSECTION OF RIDGEWOOD RD & ADKINS BLVD

         Monitor Statistics
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   1       SUPPORTING  MISSISSIPPI DEQ, OFFICE OF POLLUTION
 SLAMS                  11
                                                                           Agency
                                                                                                       Begin Date
                                                                                                                         End Date
    Road
   Number
     1
     2
Road Name
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
                                                Traffic
                                                Count
              Traffic
              Year
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
       11000
        1500
                                                            Compass
                                            Road Type         Sector
                                            THRUST OR HY     UNK
                                            LOCAL ST OR HY     UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                    Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    28.059.D006                   Site Name:
Street Address :   HOSPITAL ROAD AT CO. HEALTH DEPT.
State:            MISSISSIPPI
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19920810
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS
Type  Met Site :
Urban Area :  PASCAGOULA, MS
City Population :  29318
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :    30.378194
UTM Zone: 16
Accuracy :  0
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD :
Block Group  :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -88.533944
UTM Northing :  3361495
Datum:  UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
                                   Local ID :
City:  PASCAGOULA
County:  JACKSON
Location Setting :   URBAN AND CENTER CITY
Land Use : COMMERCIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     MOBILE-PENSACOLA-PANAMA CITY-SOUTHERN
           MISSISSIPPI
Direct  Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : ATLANTA
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting:       352612
Scale:  0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 LOCATED BEHIND THE JACKSON CO. HEALTH DEPT.

         Monitor Statistics
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors Role         Agency Desc
 OTHER                   1      SUPPORTING  MISSISSIPPI DEQ, OFFICE OF POLLUTION
 SLAMS                  12
                                                Agency
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                             Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                      Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    28.081-0005
Street Address :   TUPELO AIRPORT
State:             MISSISSIPPI
Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : INTERPOLATION-MAP
Date Established :  19980101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA: NOT IN AN MSA
Type Met Site :
Urban Area:  NOT IN AN URBAN AREA
City Population :  23905
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   34.264917
UTM Zone: 16
Accuracy : 0
Vertical Measure (m):    107.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                           Site Name : TUPELO AIRPORT NEAR OLD NWS OFFICE
                                                                      City:  TUPELO
                                                                                                                      Local ID :
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQ Eval. Date :
                           CMSA:
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :

                           Dir. to CBD :
                           Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
                           Site Longitude :   -88.766222
                           UTM Northing : 3792724
                           Datum:   NAD83
                           Vert Accuracy :
            County:   LEE
            Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
            Land Use :  COMMERCIAL
            Last Updated :

            AQCR:      NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI
            Direct Met Site :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : ATLANTA
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone :
            UTM Easting :        337398
            Scale:   24000

            Vert Method :  UNKNOWN
                                                              Met. Site ID :
                                                              Point/Line/Area:  POINT
         Monitor Statistics
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 OTHER                   1       SUPPORTING  MISSISSIPPI DEQ, OFFICE OF POLLUTION
 SLAMS                   11
                                                                            Agency
                                                                                                        Begin Date
                                                                                                                          End Date
    Road
   Number
     1
     2
Road Name
LEMON
JACKSON
                                                Traffic
                                                Count
        100
       4800
Traffic
 Year
 1997
 1995
                                                                  Traffic Volume Source
Road Type
LOCAL ST OR HY
LOCAL ST OR HY
Compass
 Sector
   S
   E

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air  Quality  Subsystem
                         SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                       Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    29.510.D089
Street Address :  3026 MINNESOTA AVE
State:              MISSOURI
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  GPS - UNSPECIFIED
Date Established :  20010501
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : ST. LOUIS, MO-IL
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :   ST. LOUIS, MO-IL
City Population :  453085
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   38.601778
UTM Zone: 15
Accuracy :  3
Vertical Measure (m):    100.0
Vert Datum : MEAN SEA-LEVEL
                                        Site Name :
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -90.232778
UTM Northing : 4276012.22
Datum:   NAD27
Vert Accuracy :  3
                                                              Local ID :
                          City:  ST LOUIS
                          County :  ST LOUIS (CITY)
                          Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                          Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                          Last Updated :  20020509
AQCR :     METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS
Direct Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :        740983.02
Scale:   0

Vert Method :   OTHER
                                                              Met. Site ID :
                                                              Point/Line/Area:  POINT
         Monitor Statistics                                                                  Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 TRENDS SPECIATIO        64      SUPPORTING  ST LOUIS CITY DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
                                                                              Begin Date
                                                                              20010501
                                                                                                End Date

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air  Quality Subsystem
                         SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                       Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    29.510.D090                   Site Name:  CAP SITE
Street Address :  GRATTON CAP SITE
State :              MISSOURI             Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  GPS CARRIER PHASE STATIC RELATIVE POSITION
Date Established :  20010401
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA :  ST. LOUIS, MO-IL
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :  ST. LOUIS, MO-IL
City Population :  453085
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   38.616833
UTM Zone:  15
Accuracy :  303.63
Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA:
Dist to Met. Site (m) :

Dir. to CBD :
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
Site Longitude :   -90.208222
UTM Northing : 4277730
Datum:   NAD83
Vert Accuracy :
                                                              Local ID :
                          City:  ST LOUIS
                          County :  ST LOUIS (CITY)
                          Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                          Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                          Last Updated :
AQCR :     METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS
Direct Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :        743086
Scale:   24000

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                              Met. Site ID :
                                                              Point/Line/Area:  POINT
         Monitor Statistics                                                                  Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 OTHER                  6      SUPPORTING  ST LOUIS CITY DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
 TRENDS SPECIATIO        58
                                                                              Begin Date
                                                                                                End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            HICKORY
                     Traffic
                     Count
                                                                1000
              Traffic
               Year
               1999
                                                                              Traffic Volume Source
                                                                                        Road Type
                                                                                        LOCAL ST OR HY
                                                             Compass
                                                              Sector

-------
vvEPA
               United States
               Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality  Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
Site ID:    29-510-.0091
Street Address :  KEOKUK STREET SITE
State:              MISSOURI             Zip Code
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
                                                           Site Name :  KEOKUK
                                                                                 City: ST LOUIS
                                                                                 County :  ST LOUIS (CITY)
                                                                                 Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                                                                                 Land Use: RESIDENTIAL
 Regional Eval. Date :
 MSA:
 Type Met Site :
 Urban Area :   ST. LOUIS, MO-IL
 City Population :   453085
 Census Block :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :    38.585953
 UTMZone: 15
 Accuracy : 303.63
 Vertical Measure (m):     0.0
 Vert Datum :  UNKNOWN
                                      HQ Eval. Date :
                                           CMSA :
                                      Dist to Met. Site (m):

                                      Dir. to CBD :
                                      Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
                                      Site Longitude :  -90.238814
                                      UTM Northing :  4274239.90
                                      Datum :   NAD83
                                      Vert Accuracy:
AQCR :      METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS
Direct Met Site :                      Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : KANSAS CITY
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
                         UTM Easting :
                         Scale:   24000
                                                Time Zone
                                           740510.16
                                                            Point/Line/Area :  POINT
                                                                                 Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
           Monitor Statistics
  •Vtaniior Type          # of Monitors  Role
                                            Agency Dcsc
                                                                                     Agency
                                                               Date
                                                  End Date
     Road
    Number
             Rdad Mgme
                                                          Traffic
                                                          Conn!
              Trailrc
              Year
                                                                            TraHit Volume Source
                                                                                                                           Road Type
                                                          Compass
                                                           Sector

-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    34.007-0003
 Street Address :   COPEWOOD E. DAVIS STS;
 State :            NEW JERSEY
 Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
 Date Established :  19680101
 Regional Eval. Date : 19870507
 MSA : PHILADELPHIA, PA-NJ
 Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
 Urban Area :  PHILADELPHIA, PA-NJ
 City Population :  84910
 Census Block:
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :    39.922778
 UTM Zone: 18
 Accuracy :  0
 Vertical Measure (m):   6.0
 Vert Datum : UNKNOWN
                       Site Name :
                     TRAILER
                       Zip Code :
                       Date Terminated :
                       HQ Eval. Date: 19920310
                       CMSA : PHIL-WIL-AT.C, PA-NJ-DE-MD
                       Dist to Met. Site (m):
                                                            Local ID :
                       Dir. to CBD : SE
                       Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):  7
                       Site Longitude :  -75.097222
                       UTM Northing : 4419012
                       Datum :   UNKNOWN
                       Vert Accuracy  :
                         City:  CAMDEN
                         County :   CAMDEN
                         Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
                         Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                         Last Updated :
                         AQCR :
                                    METROPOLITAN PHILADELPHIA
Direct Met Site:
Local Region :
EPA Region : NEW YORK CITY
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  EASTERN
UTM Easting :       491692
Scale:  0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                            Met. Site ID :
                                                            Point/Line/Area :   POINT
       ^"° Commonls
  NJ #04081, START SO2,O3,1/1/68,NJ #058(TSP)START 9/3/83, SO4 10/83 START IP #2 10/83,SSI,SLAMS-TSP,CO 10/1/84;TSP DISC.12/31/86

          Monitor Statistics                                                               Agency
  Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc                '•  •"    '                   *
  NAMS                  3      SUPPORTING  NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
  OTHER                 499
  SLAMS                  94
  TRENDS SPECIATIO       64
  UNKNOWN              128
                                                                                                 Begin Date
                                                                           End Date
Road
Number
1
2
3
Road Name
ROUTE 130
HADDON AVENUE
UNKNOWN
                                                            Traffic
                                                            Count
                                                     Traffic
                                                     Year
                                                                             Traffic Volume Source
                                                              45000    1986
                                                              14000    1986
                                                               3000
                                                                                                           Road Type
                                                                                                           MAJ ST OR HY
                                                                                                           THRU ST OR HY
                                                                                                           LOCAL ST OR HY
                                                                                    Compass
                                                                                     Sector
                                                                                       E
                                                                                      NE
                                                                                      UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                                             Air Quality Subsystem
                                                   SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    34.023.D006                   Site Name:
Street Address :   RYDERS LANE & LOG CABIN ROAD
State:            NEW JERSEY
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method : UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19810101
Regional Eval. Date :  19801121
MSA :  MIDDLESEX-SOMERSET-HUNTERDON,
      NJ
Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
Urban Area :  TRENTON, NJ-PA
City Population :  1
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   40.473333
UTM Zone:  18
Accuracy :  0
Vertical Measure (m):    21.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
                           Zip Code :
                           Date Terminated :
                           HQEval. Date : 19810916
                           CMSA :  NY-N.NJ-L.IS, NY-NJ-CT-PA
                           Dist to Met. Site (m) :
                           Dir.toCBD:NE
                           Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):  41
                           Site Longitude :   -74.425556
                           UTM Northing :  4480242
                           Datum:  UNKNOWN
                           Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
            City:  NOT IN A CITY
            County:  MIDDLESEX
            Location Setting :  RURAL
            Land Use : AGRICULTURAL
            Last Updated :

            AQCR :     NEW JERSEY-NEW YORK-CONNECTICUT
            Direct Met Site :                        Met. Site ID :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : NEW YORK CITY
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone :  EASTERN
            UTM Easting :        548696
            Scale:  0                           Point/Line/Area:  POINT

            Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 NJ#12142, START 3/81 START 3/81, DISC. SO2 5/2/83, NO2 11/30/84

         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 NAMS                   1       SUPPORTING  NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
 OTHER                   1
 SLAMS                  13
 TRENDS SPECIATIO       130
                                                                                                       Begin Date
                                                                                                                         End Date
    Road
   Number
Road Name
UNKNOWN
    Traffic
    Count
Traffic
 Year
                                                                 Traffic Volume Source
                                                              63000
Road Type
EXPRESSWAY
Compass
 Sector
  UNK

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
Site ID:    34.027.3001                   Site Name:
Street Address :   BLDG.#1, BELL LABS, OFF ROUTE 513
State :            NEW JERSEY           Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19780101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : NEWARK, NJ
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :  ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM-EASTON, PA-NJ
City Population :  1                        Dir. to CBD :
Census Block  :                           Block Group :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude:    40.787222                 Site Longitude:   -74.6775
UTMZone: 18                           UTM Northing : 4515000
Accuracy :  0                             Datum :   UNKNOWN
Vertical Measure (m):    274.0              Vert Accuracy :
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Date Terminated :
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA :  NY-N.NJ-L.IS, NY-NJ-CT-PA
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
                 Dist. to City (km):
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
City:  NOT IN A CITY
County:  MORRIS
Location Setting :  RURAL
Land Use : AGRICULTURAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     NEW JERSEY-NEW YORK-CONNECTICUT
Direct  Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
Local Region :
EPA Region : NEW YORK CITY
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  EASTERN
UTM Easting :        527200
Scale:  0                           Point/Line/Area:  POINT

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
 Site Comments
 NJ #14061 .START O3 3/1/76;TSP NJ #550,7/74-7/16/82; 1980 NECRMP START SO2 9/82, NO2 11/82; DEPT.ENER.;SO2,NO2 AS SLAMS 10/01/84

         Monitor Statistics                                                                Agency
 Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 SLAMS                  13      SUPPORTING   NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
 TRENDS SPECIATIO       64
 UNKNOWN                5
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                              End Date

-------
&EPA
               United States
               Environmental Protection Agency
                                                     Air Quality  Subsystem
                                                           SITE DESCRIPTION
                                       Date Terminated :
                                       HQ Eval. Date : 19800922
                                       CMSA :  NY-N.NJ-L.IS, NY-NJ-CT-PA
                                       Dist to Met. Site (m):
Site ID :     34.039- 0004                  Site Name :
Street Address :  NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE INTERCHANGE 13
State :           NEW JERSEY           Zip Code :
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :   19720101
Regional Eval. Date : 19860603
MSA : NEWARK, NJ
Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
Urban Area :  NEW YORK, NY-NORTHEASTERN NEW JERSEY
City Population :  106201                  Dir. to CBD : SW
Census Block :                          Block Group :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :  40.641111                 Site Longitude :
UTMZone: 18                          UTM Northing :  4499009
Accuracy :  0                            Datum :  UNKNOWN
Vertical Measure (m):   15.0              Vert Accuracy :
Vert Datum : UNKNOWN
                                                        Dist. to City (km):  23
                                                      74.207778
                                                                                                                Local ID :
                                                                             City :  ELIZABETH
                                                                             County :   UNION
                                                                             Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
                                                                             Land Use: INDUSTRIAL
                                                                             Last Updated :

                                                                             AQCR :     NEW JERSEY-NEW YORK-CONNECTICUT
                                                                             Direct Met Site :                       Met. Site ID :
                                                                             Local Region :
                                                                             EPA Region : NEW YORK CITY
                                                                             Census Tract:
                                                                             Class 1 Area :
                                                                             Time Zone : EASTERN
                                                                             UTM Easting :        566989
                                                                             Scale:  0                          Point/Line/Area:  POINT

                                                                              Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
   Site Comments                                           '•'   ,'    .*/
   NJ #20042,START 4/72.NO2 AS SLAMS 10/1/84,PM10,DICHOT,3/15/86 SO2 METH.20 1/1/79.NO2 METH.14,3/9/79,CO 2/10/80.NO2-MIDDLESCALE
        Monitor StBlisfies
Monitor Typtt          « a* Monitors  Rote
MA.MS                   1
OTHER                309
SLAMS                26
TRENDS SPECIATIO       64
UNKNOWN              11

   Road
  Number    Road Ha me
     1      UNKNOWN
     2      UMKNQWN
                                                                                      Agoncy
                                                   Desc
                                                                                                                 Begin. Date
                                                                                                                                   Eno
                                         NCi  MrW JE HSEY STATE DEPARTMENT f,F ENVIHGNMENTAL PROTECTION'
Traillc      Traffic
Count      Year    Traffic Volume Source
                                                                                                                           Road T'ypR
                                                                                                                           EXPRESSWAY
                                                                                                                           EXPRESSWAY
                                                                                                                                           Compass
                                                                                                                                            Sector
                                                                                                                                             UNK
                                                                                                                                             UHK

-------
vxEPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID :    38-057.0004
 Street Address :  BEULAH NORTH
 State :          NORTH DAKOTA
 Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  GPS CARRIER PHASE STATIC
 Date Established :  19981213
 Regional Eval. Date :
 MSA : NOT IN AN MSA
 Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
 Urban Area :  NOT IN AN URBAN AREA
 City Population : 1
 Census Block:
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :   47.298611
 UTMZone: 14
 Accuracy :  .3
 Vertical Measure (m):    630.0
 Vert Datum : UNKNOWN
                       Site Name : LICATED IN A WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA
                                                                City :
                       Zip Code :
                                                                                                                  Local ID
                    RELATIVE POSITION
                       Date Terminated :
                       HQ Eval. Date :
                       CMSA:
                       Dist to Met. Site (m):

                       Dir. to CBD :
                       Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
                       Site Longitude :   -101.766944
                       HTM Northing : 5241843
                       Datum :   UNKNOWN
                       Vert Accuracy :
     NOT IN A CITY
County :  MERCER
Location Setting :  RURAL
Land Use: AGRICULTURAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :      NORTH DAKOTA
Direct Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : DENVER
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :       290816
Scale:  0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                           Met. Site ID :
                                                           Point/Line/Area   POINT
           Monitgr Statistics
  ""vlonilor lype          ft ol JvtaiitDrs  fidle         Agency Desc
  OTHER                149     SUPPORTING  NORTH DAKOTA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
  SLAMS                26
                                                                      Agency
Road
Number
-
2
3
Road Name
HIGHWAY 200
COUNTY ROAD
CITY STREET
                                                           Traffic
                                                           Count
                                                    Traffic
                                                     Year
                                                              1000   1998
                                                               100   1998
                                                               250   1998
                                                                                                 Begm Date
                                                                            Traffic Volume Source
                                                                                                                  End Dale-
Road Type
THRU ST OR HY
LOCAL ST OR HY
THRU ST OR HY
Compass
Sector
N
W
S

-------
svEPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
                                                       Air Quality Subsystem
                                                             SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    46-099-0007                  Site Name :  NEAR HILLTOP WATERTOWER
 Street Address :   BAHNSON AVE, HILLTOP SITE
                                       Zip Code
                                       Date Terminated :
                                       HQ Eval. Date :
                                       CMSA:
                                       Dist to Met. Site (m):

                                       Dir. to CBD :
                                       Block Group :
                                          Dist. to City (km):
                                       Site Longitude :   -96.68055
                                       UTM Northing :  4822810.79
                                       Datum :  NAD27
                                       Vert Accuracy :
                                                                                                     Local ID
                                                                   City: SIOUX FALLS
                                                                   County:  MINNEHAHA
                                                                   Location Setting :  URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                                                                   Land Use : RESIDENTIAL
                                                                   Last Updated : 20020926
                                                                   AQCR :
State :           SOUTH DAKOTA
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19990101
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : SIOUX FALLS, SD
Type Met Site :
Urban Area :   SIOUX FALLS, SD
City Population : 81343
Census  Block:
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :   43.53666
UTM Zone: 14
Accuracy : 1.82
Vertical  Measure (m):    0.0
Vert Datum :  UNKNOWN

 Site Comments
 SAMPLING SHI£LT£H  WEST OF WATERTOWEH

         Monitor Statistics
 •Monitor Type         # of Monitors  Role          Agency Desc
 SHHER                30R     SUPPORTING   SOUTH DAKOTA DFPT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AIR QUALITY PHOC
                                                                              METROPOLITAN SIOUX FALLS
Direct Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : DENVER
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :
Scale:  24000
                                                                                                     Met. Site ID :
                                                                                     687408.93
                                                                                                     Point/Line/Area   POINT
                                                                                 Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                                                      Agency
                                                                                                                      Date
                                                                                                                                   End Dale
      Read
     Number
Road Name
BAHNSONAVE
                                                           Traffic     Tialfe
                                                           Counl      Year   Traffic Volume Source
                                                              4320    1K39
                                                                                                                           Ftead Type
                                                                                                                           THRUST OR HY
                                                          Compass
                                                           Sector

-------
vvEPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    48-141-0055
 Street Address :   650 R.E. THOMASON LOOP
 State:              TEXAS
 Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  GPS CARRIER PHASE STATIC RELATIVE POSITION
                          Site Name :  SW OF TONI & BEN SWAIN INTERSECTION
                                                                    City: EL PASO
                                                                                                                   Local ID :
                          Zip Code :
 Date Established :  19990901
 Regional Eval. Date:
 MSA :  EL PASO, TX
 Type Met Site : ON-SITE MET EQUIP
 Urban Area :   EL PASO, TX-NM
 City Population : 425259
 Census Block  :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :    31.746667
 UTMZone: 13
 Accuracy : 3643.52
 Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
 Vert Datum:   UNKNOWN
                          Date Terminated :
                          HQ Eval. Date :
                          CMSA :
                          Dist to Met. Site (m):

                          Dir. to CBD :
                          Block Group  :
Dist. to City (km)
                          Site Longitude :   -106.402778
                          UTM Northing :  3513025
                          Datum :  NAD83
                          Vert Accuracy :
           County:  EL PASO
           Location Setting :   URBAN AND CENTER CITY
           Land Use : COMMERCIAL
           Last Updated :

           AQCR :     EL PASO-LAS CRUCES-ALAMOGORDO
           Direct Met Site :                       Met. Site ID
           Local Region :
           EPA Region : DALLAS
           Census Tract:
           Class 1 Area :
           Time Zone :
                             367128
                         UTM Easting :
                         Scale:   24000
                                                                                 Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                            Point/Line/Area :  POINT
           Monitor Statistics
  "*"\toiSor Type         " of Monitors  Rate          Agency Doss
  OTHER                144     SUPPORTING   Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
  SLAMS                 1
  UNKNOWN              1
  UNOFFICIAL PAMS       212
        float!
       Nurnoer
      1
      2
   Hoatf Norms
THOMASON LOOP
BEN SWAIN
      TralSic
      Counl
       2450
       1340
 Traffic
  Year
1992
1992
                                                                          Agency
                                                                                                     Begin Data
                                                                                                                      End Date
Trallic Volume Sgurce
Compass
 Sector
Road Type
LOCAL ST OR HY      E
LOCAL ST OR HY     NW

-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    48-439-0057
 Street Address :   1101 E. ARKANSAS LANE
 State:              TEXAS
 Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  INTERPOLATION-MAP
 Date Established : 19980219
 Regional Eval. Date :
 MSA : FORT WORTH-ARLINGTON, TX
 Type Met Site :  ON-SITE MET EQUIP
 Urban Area :  DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TX
 City Population :  160113
 Census Block :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :    32.706944
 UTMZone: 14
 Accuracy :  218611.12
 Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
 Vert Datum : UNKNOWN
                       Site Name :  NORTH OF LEXINGTON & EAST ARKANSAS INTERSECTION
                                                                City:  ARLINGTON
                       Zip Code :
                                                                                                                   Local ID
                       Date Terminated :
                       HQ Eval. Date :
                       CMSA : DALLAS-FORT WORTH, TX
                       Dist to Met. Site (m):
                       Dir. to CBD :
                       Block Group :
Dist. to City (km)
                       Site Longitude :   -97.093611
                       UTM Northing: 3620216
                       Datum :   NAD83
                       Vert Accuracy :
                         County :  TARRANT
                         Location Setting :   URBAN AND CENTER CITY
                         Land Use: RESIDENTIAL
                         Last Updated :
                         AQCR :
                                    METROPOLITAN DALLAS-FORT WORTH
Direct Met Site:
Local Region :
EPA Region : DALLAS
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :
UTM Easting :
Scale:  24000
                                                            Met. Site ID
                                           678691
                                                            Point/Line/Area :  POINT
                                                                Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
          Monitor Statistics
  Monitor Type          # of Monitors  Role         Agency Desc
  OTHER                 315     SUPPORTING  Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
  SLAMS
        Road
       Number
                Hoad Kamo
             EAST ARKANSAS
                                             Traffic     Traffic
                                             C-ouiU      Y'oar
                                             17472   1998
                                                                      Agency
                                                                                                 Begin Date
                      If arise Volume Source
                                                                                                                  End Date
                                                                    Road Type
                                                                    LOCAL ST OR HY
                                                                                   Compass
                                                                                     Sector

-------
vvEPA
    United States
    Environmental Protection Agency
 Air Quality Subsystem
       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID :
           49-035-3007
                                       Site Name : UTM COORDINATES = PROBE LOCATION
                                                                                                                    Local ID :  WV
 Street Address :   3275 W 3100 S, WEST VALLEY CITY, UTAH
 State :               UTAH              Zip Code :
 Location Description :  MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  GPS CODE (PSEUDO RANGE) PRECISE POSITION
 Date Established :  19990121
 Regional Eval. Date :
 MSA :  SALT LAKE CITY-OGDEN, UT
 Type Met Site :
 Urban Area :  SALT LAKE CITY, UT
 City Population :  72378
 Census Block :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :   40.704444
 UTM Zone: 12
 Accuracy :  24.29
 Vertical Measure (m):    1,295.0
 Vert Datum : UNKNOWN
                          Date Terminated :
                          HQ Eval. Date :
                          CMSA :
                          Dist to Met. Site (m):

                          Dir. to CBD :
                          Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):
                          Site Longitude :   -111.968611
                          UTM Northing : 4506194
                          Datum :   NAD83
                          Vert Accuracy :
            City: WEST VALLEY
            County :  SALT LAKE
            Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
            Land Use: RESIDENTIAL
            last Updated :

            AQCR :     WASATCH FRONT
            Direct Met Site :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : DENVER
            Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone : MOUNTAIN
            UTM Easting :        418164
            Scale:  24000

            Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                            Met. Site ID :
                                                            Point/Line/Area   POINT
          Monitor Statistics
  Vlonilor Type          » of Monitors  Rose          Agency Desc
  3JTHER                318     SUPPORTER   UTAH DEPARTMENT 0F ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
  3 LAMS                 3
                                                                         Agcrtey
                                                                                                     Begin Date
                                                                           End Dale
     Road
    Number
      1
      2
Road Name
3100 SOUTH
3200 WEST
    Traffic
    Count
      10160
      10385
Traffic
 Year
 1995
 1995
Traffic Volume Source
                                               Road Type
                                               THRUST OR HY
                                               THRU ST OR HY
Compass
 Sector
   N
   E

-------
vvEPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
                 Air Quality Subsystem
                       SITE DESCRIPTION
 Site ID:    72.017-0003
 Street Address :  CENTRO COMUNAL BARRIO TIBURONES
 State :           PUERTO RICO
 Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
 Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
 Date Established :   19940826
 Regional Eval. Date :
 MSA : SAN JUAN-BAYAMON, PR
 Type Met Site :
 Urban Area :  ARECIBO, PR
 City Population :  4502
 Census Block :
 Congressional District:
 Site Latitude :   18.436111
 UTMZone: 19
 Accuracy : 30.36
 Vertical Measure (m):    0.0
 Vert Datum : UNKNOWN
                          Site Name :  RURAL ZONE; NEAR AGRICULTURAL AND
                                    INDUSTRIAL/PHARMACEUTICAL AREA
                                                                   City :  BARCELONETA
                                                                   County:  BARCELONETA
                                                                   Location Setting :  RURAL
                                                                   Land Use: RESIDENTIAL
                                                                                                                  Local ID :
Zip Code:
                          Date Terminated :
                          HQ Eval. Date:
                          CMSA : SJ-CAGUAS-ARECIBO, PR
                          Dist to Met. Site (m):
                          Dir. to CBD :
                          Block Group :
                Dist. to City (km):
                          Site Longitude :   -66.580556
                          UTM Northing : 2040021
                          Datum :   UNKNOWN
                          Vert Accuracy:
          Monitor Slallsllcs
       f Type          " of Monitors  Role
  SLAMS                  2      SUPPORTING
            Last Updated :

            AQCR :     PUERTO RICO
            Direct Met Site :
            Local Region :
            EPA Region : NEW YORK CITY
           •/Census Tract:
            Class 1 Area :
            Time Zone :
            UTM Easting :       755557
            Scale:  20000

            Vert Method :  UNKNOWN
                                                                                                     Met. Site ID :
                                                                           Point/Line/Area :  POINT
                                                                        Agency
                               Agency Dose
                               PUERTO RICO ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD
                                                                         Begin Data
                                                                                          End Dale
     Road
    Number
Road Name
CALLE #1
                    Traffic
                    Count
                                                                10
Traffic
 Year
 1994
Traffic Volume Source
               Compass
Road Type        Sector
LOCAL ST OR HY     E

-------
                United States
                Environmental Protection Agency
                  Air Quality Subsystem
                        SITE DESCRIPTION
Site ID :    72.127-.0006                   Site Name :
Street Address :  HIGH SCHOOL TRINA PADILLA.HATO REY
State :            PUERTO RICO
Location Description :   MONITORING POINT
Coll. Method :  UNKNOWN
Date Established :  19841208
Regional Eval. Date :
MSA : SAN JUAN-BAYAMON, PR
Type  Met Site :
Urban Area:  SAN JUAN, PR
City Population :  1
Census Block :
Congressional District:
Site Latitude :    18.408056
UTM Zone: 19
Accuracy :  0
Vertical Measure (m):    5.0
Vert Datum: UNKNOWN
Zip Code :
Date Terminated :  19850514
HQ Eval. Date :
CMSA :  SJ-CAGUAS-ARECIBO, PR
Dist to Met. Site (m) :
Dir. to CBD : S
Block Group :
Dist. to City (km):  5
Site Longitude :   -66.073056
UTM Northing : 2037736
Datum:   UNKNOWN
Vert Accuracy :
City:  NOT IN A CITY
County :  SAN JUAN
Location Setting :  SUBURBAN
Land Use :  COMMERCIAL
Last Updated :

AQCR :     PUERTO RICO
Direct  Met Site :
Local Region :
EPA Region : NEW YORK CITY
Census Tract:
Class 1 Area :
Time Zone :  ATLANTIC
UTM Easting :        809246
Scale:  0

Vert Method :   UNKNOWN
                                                                                                                                     Oct. 26, 2002
                                                                                                                     Local ID :
                                                             Met. Site ID :
                                                             Point/Line/Area:  POINT
 Site Comments
 EQB #29, START 12/8/84.NAMS-PB RELOCATION FROM#402160005F01 NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE SITE,DOES NOT MEET SITING CRITERIA,DISC.5/14/85
                                                                                       Agency
                                Role          Agency Desc
                                SUPPORTING   PUERTO RICO ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD
                                                                            Begin Date
                                                                                                                                     End Date
    Road
   Number
            Road Name
            UNKNOWN
                     Traffic
                     Count
              Traffic
              Year   Traffic Volume Source
                                                              51000
                                                                                       Road Type
                                                                                       EXPRESSWAY
                                                            Compass
                                                             Sector
                                                              UNK

-------
                Appendix B




Summary of Invalidated UATMP Samples for Site

-------
  Invalid samples in Phoenix, AZ (Supersite)
ERG ID
20678
21299
25012
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
709
041
679
Date Sampled
6/6/01
6/18/01
12/21/01
Invalid Reason
Instrument problem
System ran for only 5 minutes
Canister leak
Analysis Method
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO- 15
 Invalid samples in Phoenix, AZ (Queen Valley)
ERG ID
20679
21456
22187
22193
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
859
043
074
031
Date Sampled
6/6/01
6/24/01
7/24/01
7/30/01
Invalid Reason
Instrument problem
Operator error
Lab void
Lab void
Analysis Method
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
Invalid samples in Phoenix, AZ (South Pheonix)
ERG ID
22371
23011
23615
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
037
044
845
Date Sampled
8/17/01
9/16/01
10/16/01
Invalid Reason
Instrument malfunction
Did not run instrument problems
Site requested: believed leak
Analysis Method
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC

-------
       Invalid samples in Denver, CO
ERG ID
20355
20356
21822
21823
19316
19318
20354
21821
22949
Comments
VOID - field blk
VOID
VOID - field blk
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
SNMOC VOID
Canister #
FB

FB

192 dupl
170 dup2
775
656
850
Date Sampled
5/25/02
5/25/02
7/24/01
7/24/01
2/12/01
2/12/01
5/25/01
7/24/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Sample void - Field blank void
No ozone scrubber in place
Sample void - Field blank void
System ran to long
Lab void
Lab void
Carbonyl void
System ran to long
Data lost
Analysis Method
TO- 11 A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC
Invalid samples in Grand Junction, CO (Site 1)
ERG ID
23815
22237
22238
Comments
VOID
VOID - FB
VOID
Canister #
Q1057186
FB

Date Sampled
9/22/01
8/11/01
8/11/01
Invalid Reason
Lab void
Lab void
Lab void
Analysis Method
IO-3
TO-11A
TO-11A

-------
Invalid samples in Grand Junction, CO (Site 2)
ERG ID
21827
Comments
VOID
Canister #
189
Date Sampled
7/18/01
Invalid Reason
Lab void
Analysis Method
TO- 15

-------
     Invalid samples in St. Petersburg, FL - Azalea Park
Method ERG
19051
19845
19846
20540
20628
22328
23348
24409
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #

Dl
D2





Date Sampled
1/7/01
4/13/01
4/13/01
6/6/01
6/12/01
8/17/01
10/10/01
12/4/01
Invalid Reason
No ran. Operator error
Tube invalid because of water in O3
Duplicate 1 void
Lab void
Lab void
Tube invalid because of water in O3
Sample ran for two days
Operator error
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
Invalid samples in St. Petersburg, FL - Dunedin Middle School
ERG ID
21125
21422
21848
21849
Comments
D2
Dl
VOID
VOID
Canister #
dup2
dupl
dup 1
dup2
Date Sampled
6/24/01
7/6/01
7/30/01
7/30/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A

-------
Invalid samples in St. Petersburg, FL - East Lake
ERG ID
21280
21424
22022
22114
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #




Date Sampled
6/30/01
7/6/01
8/5/01
8/11/01
Invalid Reason
Lab Void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
    Invalid samples in Tampa, FL - Gandy
ERG ID
19200
21046
21047
21480
21647
21648
22322
22323
23419
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
Canister #

Dupl
Dup2

FB




Date Sampled
1/31/01
6/24/01
6/24/01
7/12/01
7/18/01
7/18/01
8/17/01
8/17/01
10/17/01
Invalid Reason
Void, run 14 hours
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
System did not run long enough
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO11A
TO11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 11
TO-11A

-------
 Invalid samples in Tampa, FL - Lewis
ERG ID
19039
20006
Comments
VOID
VOID
Canister #


Date Sampled
1/7/01
5/1/01
Invalid Reason
Program timer not set up correctly
Carbonyl tube not hooked up correctly
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
Invalid samples in Tampa, FL - Simmons
ERG ID
20381
20516
20609
21649
21650
21766
21767
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #



FB


FB
Date Sampled
5/25/01
6/6/01
6/12/01
7/18/01
7/18/01
7/24/01
7/24/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
No initial flow
Sample void - Field blank void
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A

-------
 Invalid samples in Clinton, IA
ERG ID
19372
19374
19607
19609
19371
19373
19606
19608
22992
Comments
Dl VOID
D2 VOID
Dl VOID
D2 VOID
Dl VOID
D2 VOID
Dl VOID
D2 VOID
SNMOC ONLY
Canister #
dupl
dup2
dupl
dup2
165-dupl
911-dup2
151-dupl
575-dup2
9121
Date Sampled
2/18/01
2/18/01
3/20/01
3/20/01
2/18/01
2/18/01
3/20/01
3/20/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Canister voided
Canister voided
Canister voided
Canister voided
Vacuum to high
Vacuum to high
Lab voided
Lab voided
Data lost
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC
Invalid samples in Davenport, IA
ERG ID
19356
19358
21797
21798
19355
Comments
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
Dl
Canister #
dupl
dup2
FB

150-dupl
Date Sampled
2/18/01
2/18/01
7/24/01
7/24/01
2/18/01
Invalid Reason
Canister voided
Canister voided
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Canister vacuum to high
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in Davenport, IA (continued)
ERG ID
19357
21796
22995
Comments
D2
VOID
SNMOC VOID
Canister #
072-dup2
559
559
Date Sampled
2/18/01
7/24/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Canister vacuum to high
Carbonyl voided
Data lost
Analysis Method
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC
     Invalid samples in Muscatine, IA
ERG ID
21895
21894
22260
22998
Comments
VOID
VOID
Dl
SNMOC ONLY
Canister #

714
2966-D1
823
Date Sampled
7/30/01
7/30/01
8/17/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Carbonyl void
Lab void
Data loss
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in Des Moines, IA
ERG ID
19101
19103
19516
19555
19819
21694
21695
24291
19100
19102
19515
19818
21693
22957
24290
Comments
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID - FLD BLK
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
VOID
SNMOC VOID
VOID
Canister #





FB


140
704
799
R-5
577
ER008
957
Date Sampled
1/13/01
1/13/01
3/2/01
3/14/01
4/13/01
7/24/01
7/24/01
8/5/01
1/13/01
1/13/01
3/2/01
4/13/01
7/24/01
9/22/01
8/5/01
Invalid Reason
Water in sample
Water in sampler line
Canister voided
Carbonyl only ran 13.1 hours
Sample duration 47.7 hrs
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Sample never ran
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Sample duration 0 hrs.
Sample duration 47.7 hrs
Carbonyl voided
Data lost
Sample never ran
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in Cedar Rapids, IA (CRIA)
ERG ID
20427
20620
21223
22232
22233
20618
21221
22230
22231
22952
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
SNMOC DATA
Canister #



Dl
D2
192
893
863-D1
077-D2
041
Date Sampled
5/31/01
6/12/01
6/30/01
8/17/01
8/17/01
6/12/01
6/30/01
8/17/01
8/17/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Canister voided
Canister voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Valve broken off
Canister voided - episode voided
Data lost
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC
Invalid samples in Cedar Rapids, IA (C2IA)
ERG ID
19063
19457
20235
20237
Comments
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
Canister #


Dupl
dup2
Date Sampled
1/13/01
3/2/01
5/19/01
5/19/01
Invalid Reason
Tube disconnected during run
Lab void
Lab void
Lab void
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A

-------
Invalid samples in Cedar Rapids, IA - C2IA (Continued)
ERG ID
20623
21220
21595
21596
21958
22426
22428
23622
23328
24204
19347
19349
20236
20621
21218
21594
22425
22427
22936
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID Field Blank
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
VOID Field Blank
Rl
R2
D2
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
SNMOC VOID
Canister #










179-dupl
183-dup2
038-dup2
179
766
838
870
ER035
607
Date Sampled
6/12/01
6/30/01
7/18/01
7/18/01
8/5/01
8/23/01
8/23/01
10/4/01
10/10/01
11/27/01
2/18/01
2/18/01
5/19/01
6/12/01
6/30/01
7/18/01
8/23/01
8/23/01
9/19/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Sample lost
Operator error
No carb in packet
Lab Void
Lab Void
Lab void
Lab void
Tube clogged - can void
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Data lost
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in Cedar Rapids, IA (C2IA) (Continued)
ERG ID
22955
23077
23327
Comments
SNMOC VOID
SNMOC VOID
VOID
Canister #
027
647
920
Date Sampled
9/22/01
9/25/01
10/10/01
Invalid Reason
Data lost
Data lost
Operator error
Analysis Method
SNMOC
SNMOC
TO- 15

-------
Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - Allen Park
ERG ID
24382
Comments
Dl
Canister #

Date Sampled
12/3/01
Invalid Reason
Sampler motor stopped during
Analysis Method
8270
Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - Dearborne
ERG ID
20033
20034
20186
20335
21059
21859
22781
19911
20013
20021
20023
20026
20173
Comments
FIELD BLK - void
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #







Dup2




Dup2
Date Sampled
5/1/01
5/1/01
5/13/01
5/19/01
6/24/01
7/30/01
9/10/01
4/21/01
4/23/01
4/27/01
4/30/01
5/1/01
5/8/01
Invalid Reason
Field Blank - Sample void
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Canister voided
Elapsed time not reset
Ran on wrong day
GRJ tripped prior to run
Tube clogged
Instrument failure
Instrument failure
Instrument failure
No carbonyl received
No carbonyl flow
Analysis Method
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A

-------
Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - Dearborne (Continued)
ERG ID
20161
20162
20639
20932
21056
21326
21658
21667
21852
22118
23162
23218
23557
23558
19973
20046
20220
20221
20302
Comments
VOID
VOID
Dl
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
MDEQ D2
D2
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl
VOID
Canister #


dupl











028
172
022
116
802
Date Sampled
5/12/01
5/13/01
6/9/01
6/13/01
6/24/01
6/25/01
7/17/01
7/23/01
7/26/01
8/12/01
9/26/01
10/2/01
10/19/01
10/22/01
4/23/01
4/27/01
5/12/01
5/13/01
5/19/01
Invalid Reason
No carbonyl flow
No carbonyl flow
Double run - valve did not advance
Lost power during run
Elapsed time not reset
Canister voided
Tube clogged
Power outage
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Instrument error
Operator error
Ran sample too long
Ran sample too long
Instrument failure
Instrument failure
No carbonyl flow
No carbonyl flow
Bad thread on canister
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO11A
TO11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15

-------
Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - Dearborne (Continued)
ERG ID
20793
21244
22040
22041
22044
22636
23390
23602
23606
24694
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
MDEQ - VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
400-dupl
101
679-dup 2
047
042
864
1911
134
ER012
2010
Date Sampled
6/9/01
6/25/01
8/2/01
8/3/01
8/4/01
8/26/01
10/9/01
10/19/01
10/22/01
12/14/01
Invalid Reason
Double run - valve did not advance
Threading destroyed on canister
Lab void
Lab void
Lab void
Can did not pressurize - field void
Operator error
Lab void
Lab void
Valve open on canister when received
Analysis Method
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
     Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - E7 Mile
ERG ID
21016
Comments
VOID
Canister #

Date Sampled
6/18/01
Invalid Reason
Circuit breaker tripped
Analysis Method
8270

-------
       Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - Lodge/696
ERG ID
19919
20027
22784
19906
19982
23609
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #



652
653
ER005
Date Sampled
4/19/01
4/25/01
9/4/01
4/19/01
4/25/01
10/22/01
Invalid Reason
Lost power/ lost sample
Blown circuit breaker
Motor dead-no final reading
Sample time 14 hours
Blown circuit breaker
Operator Error: Sample did not run
Analysis Method
8270
8270
8270
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
     Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - River Rouge
ERG ID
23472
Comments
VOID
Canister #
089
Date Sampled
10/16/01
Invalid Reason
Operator Error
Analysis Method
TO- 15
Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - South West High School
ERG ID
24169
Comments
VOID
Canister #

Date Sampled
11/21/01
Invalid Reason
Sample did not run
Analysis Method
8270

-------
Invalid samples in Detroit, MI - Yellow Freight
ERG ID
20636
21061
21323
21324
22394
20645
21058
24760
24948
20787
21075
21241
Comments
VOID
VOID
field blk - VOID
VOID

VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #









699
724
656
Date Sampled
6/12/01
6/24/01
6/30/01
6/30/01
8/23/01
6/12/01
6/24/01
12/21/01
12/27/01
6/12/01
6/24/02
6/30/01
Invalid Reason
Carbonyl void
Carbonyl void
Sample void - Field blank void
Lost power
Lab void
No flow for end reading
Elasped timer not reset.
Power reset during mercury unit
Power loss
No flow for end reading - carb
Carbonyl void
SVOC void
Analysis Method
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
TO-11A
TO11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO15
TO15
TO- 15

-------
Invalid samples in St. Louis, MO (Site 1)
ERG ID
21668
21716
21919
22053
22410
24584
20682
21128
21290
21291
21346
21674
21673
21714
21715
21921
22052
22408
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #








FB



FB
FB




Date Sampled
7/18/01
7/24/01
7/30/01
8/5/01
8/23/01
12/15/01
6/12/01
6/24/01
6/30/01
6/30/01
7/6/01
7/18/01
7/18/01
7/24/01
7/24/01
7/30/01
8/5/01
8/23/01
Invalid Reason
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Sampler broken
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Sample void - Field blank void
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Analysis Method
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A

-------
Invalid samples in St. Louis, MO (Site 1) (Continued)
ERG ID
22688
22689
22708
20680
21127
21289
21345
21672
21713
21920
22051
22409
22687
22987
23194
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
SNMOC void only
SNMOC void only
Canister #



844
ER009
700
039
192
070
587
406
793
ER015
079
1884
Date Sampled
9/4/01
9/4/01
9/10/01
6/12/01
6/24/01
6/30/01
7/6/01
7/18/01
7/24/01
7/30/01
8/5/01
8/23/01
9/4/01
9/22/01
9/28/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Data lost
Data lost
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC
SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in St. Louis, MO (Site 2)
ERG ID
21927
24900
Comments
VOID
VOID
Canister #
803
707
Date Sampled
7/30/01
12/27/01
Invalid Reason
Canister arrived with valve broken off
Power loss
Analysis Method
TO- 15
TO- 15
Invalid samples in St. Louis, MO (Site 3)
ERG ID
20274
20275
23719
23880
24253
Comments
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
030-dupl
113-dup2
185
044
103
Date Sampled
5/19/01
5/19/01
10/28/01
11/3/01
11/27/01
Invalid Reason
Duplicate 2 void
Sample ran for 40 hours
Sampler Malfuntion (MFC malfunction)
Sample not taken (sampler under repair)
Sample not run
Analysis Method
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15

-------
 Invalid samples in Jackson, MS
ERG ID
22007
22311
23955
22006
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #



821
Date Sampled
8/5/01
8/17/01
11/11/01
8/5/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Carbonyl tube not received in lab
Carbonyl voided
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
Invalid samples in Pascagoula, MS
ERG ID
21776
21777
21996
21775
21995
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
FB


893
ER039
Date Sampled
7/24/01
7/24/01
8/5/01
7/24/01
8/5/01
Invalid Reason
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
TO- 15

-------
Invalid samples in Tupelo, MS
ERG ID
21779
21780
22013
24105
21778
22012
24104
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
FB



116
886
030
Date Sampled
7/24/01
7/24/01
8/5/01
11/21/01
7/24/01
8/5/01
11/21/01
Invalid Reason
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Ozone scrubber received instead of DNPH
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15

-------
Invalid samples in Camden, New Jersey
ERG ID
21271
20390
21215
21354
22881
22883
23768
20389
21213
22880
22882
23767
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
Canister #







789
717
031 '
028
047
Date Sampled
6/30/01
5/25/01
6/30/01
7/6/01
9/16/01
9/16/01
10/28/01
5/25/01
6/30/01
9/16/01
9/16/01
10/28/01
Invalid Reason
Carbonyl voided
Did not connect to sample line
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Canister voided
Canister voided
Carbonyl tube used without O3 scrubber
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Canister leak
Canister leak
Carbonyl voided
Analysis Method
8270
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15

-------
Invalid samples in Chester, New Jersey
ERG ID
21915
22098
22099
23315
20453
21625
21626
21689
21840
23524
23525
20452
21624
21839
23523
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID - field blk
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID - field blk
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #





FB





2203
911
652
651
Date Sampled
7/30/01
8/5/01
8/11/01
10/4/01
5/31/01
7/18/01
7/18/01
7/24/01
7/30/01
10/22/01
10/22/01
5/31/01
7/18/01
7/30/01
10/22/01
Invalid Reason
Glass thimble broke during shipment
Canister & carbonyl samples not taken
Canister & carbonyl samples not taken
Lab void
Canister voided
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Thimble broken-carbonyl voided
Sample void - Field blank void
Sampler under repair
Canister returned to ERG at 29"HG
Tube clogged - canister voided
Thimble broken - canister voided
Sampler under repair
Analysis Method
8270
8270
8270
8270
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO-15
TO- 15

-------
   Invalid samples in Elizabeth, New Jersey
ERG ID
23753
21469
22088
21468
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #




Date Sampled
10/28/01
7/12/01
8/11/01
7/12/01
Invalid Reason
Thimble was broken in field
Canister void
Clogged tube
No vacuum in canister
Analysis Method
8270
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
Invalid samples in New Brunswick, New Jersey
ERG ID
22452
20611
20612
22432
22434
24057
20610
22431
22433
24056
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
VOID
Dl
D2
VOID
Canister #

FB




052
020
096
149
Date Sampled
8/23/01
6/12/01
6/12/01
8/23/01
8/23/01
11/15/01
6/12/01
8/23/01
8/23/01
11/15/01
Invalid Reason
Dl canister voided
Sample void - Field blank void
Canister voided
Canister voided
Canister voided
Operator Error (Sample did not run)
Threading on can destroyed
Nut on can stripped
Dl canister void - episode void
Operator Error (Sample did not run)
Analysis Method
8270
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15
TO- 15

-------
Invalid samples in Beulah, North Dakota
ERG ID
19052
20000
21082
19050
19999
21081
23072
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
SNMOC VOID
Canister #



038
794
ER008
704
Date Sampled
1/7/01
5/1/01
6/24/01
1/7/01
5/1/01
6/24/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Ozone scrubber sent instead of carb tube
Timer did not run
Pre and post rotometer setting different
Carb sample invalid
Carb sample invalid
Carb sample invalid
Data lost on computer
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico
ERG ID
21026
21645
21646
22075
22076
22834
22836
23546
23547
23764
24101
21644
22074
22833
22835
24100
Comments
VOID
VOID - FB
VOID
VOID - FB
VOID
Dl - VOID
D2 - VOID
VOID - FB
VOID
D2 -VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl -VOID
D2 -VOID
VOID
Canister #

FB

FB







165
ER009
927
866
196
Date Sampled
6/24/01
7/18/01
7/18/01
8/11/01
8/11/01
9/16/01
9/16/01
10/22/01
10/22/01
11/3/01
11/18/01
7/18/01
8/11/01
9/16/01
9/16/01
11/18/01
Invalid Reason
Post sampling flow at 0
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Tube clogged- can voided
Tube clogged
Operator error
Operator error
Carbonyl Tube Clogged
Carbonyl Tube Clogged
0 flow during sampling
Carbonyl tube was clogged
Tube clogged/ can voided
Tube clogged
Operator error
Operator error
Tube clogged
First Analysis
TO11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15SNMOC
TO-15SNMOC
TO-15SNMOC
TO-15SNMOC
TO-15SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in San Juan, Puerto Rico
ERG ID
20419
21024
21642
21643
21816
22078
22079
22383
22830
22832
24793
21641
21815
22077
22382
22829
22831
Comments
lab VOID
lab VOID
VOID- field blk
VOID
VOID
VOID -field blk
VOID
VOID
Dl - VOID
D2 - VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Dl-VOID
D2 - VOID
Canister #


FB


FB





113
171
ER001
102
ER010
906
Date Sampled
5/31/01
6/24/01
7/18/01
7/18/01
7/30/01
8/11/01
8/11/01
8/23/01
9/16/01
9/16/01
12/21/01
7/18/01
7/30/01
8/11/01
8/23/01
9/16/01
9/16/01
Invalid Reason
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Sample void - Field blank void
Tube clogged
Tube clogged
Operator error
Operator error
Sampled for only 10.6 hours
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Carbonyl voided
Operator error
Operator error
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in Sioux Falls, South Dakota
ERG ID
19331
19332
22343
22358
22969
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
Canister #
632-dupl
082-dup2
ER042
ER041
ER028
Date Sampled
2/12/01
2/12/01
8/17/01
8/17/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Lab void
Lab void
Lab void
Lab void
Data loss
Analysis Method
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC

-------
Invalid samples in Arlington, Texas
ERG ID
19305
19307
19304
19306
Comments
dup 1 - void
dup 2 - void
dup 1 - void
dup 2 - void
Canister #
dupl
dup2
645-dupl
685 dup2
Date Sampled
2/12/01
2/12/01
2/12/01
2/12/01
Invalid Reason
Operator forgot to double flow rate
Operator forgot to double flow rate
Operator forgot to double flow rate
Operator forgot to double flow rate
First Analysis
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO- 15
TO- 15
 Invalid samples in El Paso, Texas
ERG ID
19059
23612
Comments
VOID
VOID
Canister #


Date Sampled
1/7/01
10/22/01
Invalid Reason
Carbonyl tube not received in lab
Sample not run long enough
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A

-------
Invalid samples in Salt Lake City, UT
ERG
19759
19776
19777
19839
19840
24115
19837
19775
19838
23004
Comments
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
SNMOC VOID ONLY
Canister #


FB

FB

799
177
115
926
Date Sampled
4/1/01
4/7/01
4/7/01
4/13/01
4/13/01
11/18/01
4/4/01
4/7/01
4/13/01
9/22/01
Invalid Reason
Lab void
Tubes were not in pouches and unmarked
Sample void - Field blank void
Received no tubes
Sample void - Field blank void
Sample did not run
Bad vacuum, 15"Hg.
Tubes were not in pouches and unmarked
Carb samples not set correctly-received
Data loss
Analysis Method
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-11A
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
TO-15/SNMOC
SNMOC

-------
              Appendix C




2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
0
0
0
0
21
23
5
23
23
23
0
21
23
0
0
23
23
0
0
23
23
23
21
23
23
1
0
0
16
23
23
23
22
23
23
16
23
23
0
23
23
2
100%
100%
100%
100%
9%
0%
78%
0%
0%
0%
100%
9%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
96%
100%
100%
30%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
91%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.58
0.367
0.525
0.489
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.207
0.11
0.05
0.069
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.188
0.420
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.282
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.35
0.040
0.040
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
3.71
1.32
0.76
1.19
0.03
0.03
0.26
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.42
0.57
0.05
0.55
0.15
0.03
0.04
2.62
2.23
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.06
0.85
0.12
0.19
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.57
0.06
0.03
1.99
0.04
0.04
0.14
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
1.28
0.53
0.60
0.73
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.31
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.44
0.99
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.42
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.53
0.04
0.04
0.06
1.75
0.69
0.61
0.76
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.13
0.05
0.30
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.73
1.13
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.51
0.09
0.08
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.15
0.06
0.03
0.83
0.04
0.04
0.06
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1.50
0.62
0.61
0.73
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.12
0.05
0.26
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.55
1.03
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.48
0.08
0.07
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.11
0.06
0.03
0.71
0.04
0.04
0.06
Standard
Deviation
0.99
0.34
0.07
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.14
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.64
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.19
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.03
Coefficient of
Variation
1.77
2.06
9.23
3.76
0.00
NA
1.15
NA
NA
NA
5.92
1.30
NA
2.22
3.72
NA
NA
1.15
2.38
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
5.00
2.72
3.18
1.86
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
1.13
NA
NA
1.66
NA
NA
1.85
                     1 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI

Samples
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24

Compound
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
Number of
Nondetects
15
23
0
0
23
6
23
0
0
0
23
23
5
23
23
23
0
0
0
0
21
24
7
22
18
12
0
24
24
0
0
23
24
23
3
24
24
24
21
24
24
4
Frequency
of Detects
35%
0%
100%
100%
0%
74%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
78%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
13%
0%
71%
8%
25%
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4%
0%
4%
88%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
83%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.030
0.030
0.062
0.151
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.08
0.04
0.071
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.48
0.223
0.389
0.378
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.175
0.11
0.05
0.095
0.074
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.21
0.03
0.35
0.90
0.04
0.24
0.03
0.42
0.15
0.37
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.46
1.83
0.73
0.87
0.03
0.03
0.16
0.14
0.24
141.94
0.69
0.11
0.05
3333.63
0.16
0.10
0.04
0.09
1.25
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.03
0.06
Median
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.20
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.11
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.01
0.42
0.60
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.42
0.32
0.11
0.05
9.21
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.67
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.03
0.14
0.34
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.17
0.05
0.15
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.19
0.55
0.61
0.63
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.07
14.13
0.34
0.11
0.05
232.57
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.69
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.29
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.14
0.05
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.06
0.48
0.61
0.62
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.97
0.33
0.11
0.05
6.46
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.55
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.04
0.00
0.08
0.23
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.11
0.03
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.35
0.08
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.05
33.79
0.10
0.00
0.00
713.82
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
Coefficient of
Variation
1.03
NA
1.69
1.51
NA
1.23
NA
1.60
1.63
1.58
NA
NA
4.68
NA
NA
NA
1.93
1.57
7.83
6.24
0.00
NA
1.52
2.64
1.26
0.42
3.30
NA
NA
0.33
4.14
2.29
NA
0.00
2.01
NA
NA
NA
3.19
NA
NA
4.87
                     2 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
0
0
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
0
24
24
10
10
24
0
0
24
9
24
0
1
0
24
24
22
24
24
24
0
0
0
0
13
22
7
22
22
11
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
58%
58%
0%
100%
100%
0%
63%
0%
100%
96%
100%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
41%
0%
68%
0%
0%
50%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.228
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.36
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.060
0.154
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.08
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.69
0.245
0.488
0.657
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
Highest
(ppbv)
1.37
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.09
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
3.05
0.04
0.04
0.48
0.32
0.03
0.41
1.19
0.04
0.13
0.03
0.52
0.20
0.50
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.05
1.16
0.74
1.21
0.22
0.03
0.20
0.05
0.04
124.57
Median
(ppbv)
0.42
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.87
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.13
0.39
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.16
0.05
0.20
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.17
0.42
0.59
0.87
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.24
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.47
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.06
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.07
0.03
0.15
0.42
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.19
0.07
0.20
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.29
0.50
0.60
0.90
0.05
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
26.85
Geometric
Standard Coefficient of
Mean (ppbv) Deviation
0.42
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.90
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.14
0.37
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.16
0.06
0.16
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.21
0.46
0.60
0.89
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
1.91
0.25
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.07
0.00
0.08
0.24
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.10
0.04
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.23
0.06
0.17
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
40.17
Variation
1.86
3.66
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.37
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.53
NA
NA
0.80
0.99
NA
1.87
1.77
NA
2.01
NA
1.84
1.58
1.63
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
2.37
2.16
9.66
5.43
0.91
NA
1.37
NA
NA
0.67
                     3 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
0
22
22
0
0
22
22
7
4
22
22
22
20
22
22
3
0
0
22
22
22
22
19
22
22
20
22
22
0
22
22
7
22
22
0
0
22
4
22
0
1
0
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
68%
82%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
86%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
68%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
82%
0%
100%
95%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.241
0.11
0.05
0.468
0.077
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.219
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
1.83
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.352
1.237
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.44
0.04
0.111
Highest
(ppbv)
0.43
0.11
0.05
11.22
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.24
2.14
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.17
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.66
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.22
0.06
0.03
9.88
0.04
0.04
0.36
0.03
0.03
1.83
6.22
0.04
0.08
0.03
1.97
0.20
0.41
Median
(ppbv)
0.29
0.11
0.05
2.77
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.57
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.32
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.92
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.82
2.72
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.97
0.05
0.23
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.31
0.11
0.05
4.01
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.76
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.38
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
3.57
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.87
2.91
0.04
0.04
0.03
1.00
0.07
0.24
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.30
0.11
0.05
2.72
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.51
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.36
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
3.21
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.80
2.72
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.93
0.06
0.22
Standard
Deviation
0.05
0.00
0.00
3.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.12
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
1.88
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.36
1.15
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.42
0.05
0.09
Coefficient of
Variation
6.15
NA
NA
1.25
6.93
NA
NA
2.66
1.24
NA
NA
NA
1.03
NA
NA
3.85
3.28
6.93
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
2.71
NA
NA
1.89
NA
NA
0.75
NA
NA
2.40
2.53
NA
2.77
NA
2.41
1.59
2.76
                     4 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
22
22
22
22
22
22
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
81
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
22
22
3
22
21
22
0
2
0
0
71
82
81
82
81
81
0
79
82
2
1
82
82
82
9
82
82
82
82
82
82
20
0
3
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
80
0%
0%
86%
0%
5%
0%
100%
98%
100%
100%
13%
0%
1%
0%
1%
1%
100%
2%
0%
98%
99%
0%
0%
0%
89%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
76%
100%
96%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.07
0.025
0.430
0.403
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.220
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.106
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.04
1.69
0.03
0.21
0.03
4.31
1.10
1.30
0.82
0.03
0.03
0.21
0.05
0.25
0.54
1.17
0.80
0.05
0.35
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.09
10.59
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.96
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.55
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.35
0.20
0.57
0.55
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.28
0.11
0.05
0.11
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.31
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.19
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.17
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.47
0.22
0.58
0.55
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.12
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.44
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.22
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.37
0.19
0.58
0.55
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.11
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.02
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.20
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.48
0.13
0.10
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.12
0.08
0.00
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.45
NA
0.98
NA
0.96
1.70
6.09
7.88
0.00
NA
1.95
NA
1.87
2.85
2.54
1.46
NA
2.07
5.02
NA
NA
NA
1.17
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
1.56
2.60
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.52
                     5 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Site Samples Compound Nondetects
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
82
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
82
82
0
82
82
62
81
82
13
7
82
77
82
24
50
18
82
82
82
82
82
82
0
0
0
0
115
136
120
131
92
133
1
133
136
22
1
135
136
136
12
135
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
24%
1%
0%
84%
91%
0%
6%
0%
71%
39%
78%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
15%
0%
12%
4%
32%
2%
99%
2%
0%
84%
99%
1%
0%
0%
91%
1%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.055
0.03
0.03
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.025
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.03
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.22
0.120
0.510
0.482
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.020
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
Highest
(ppbv)
0.06
0.03
13.23
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.16
0.03
0.80
2.94
0.04
0.18
0.03
1.57
0.15
0.39
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.57
4.46
0.95
0.89
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.22
1.13
14.15
0.72
1.51
0.05
8.34
0.33
0.10
0.04
0.09
3.04
0.60
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.06
0.03
0.14
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.62
0.77
0.59
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.13
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.40
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.69
1.02
0.59
0.61
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.14
0.28
0.31
0.12
0.05
0.32
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.23
0.06
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.06
0.03
0.17
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.63
0.77
0.59
0.61
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.08
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.09
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.89
0.05
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
1.47
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.09
0.32
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.17
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.80
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.18
1.40
0.06
0.14
0.00
1.16
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.75
0.05
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.28
NA
NA
3.72
2.27
NA
0.42
0.29
NA
2.23
NA
0.29
2.88
1.01
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.31
1.27
11.01
8.43
0.00
NA
3.01
1.65
0.81
0.20
4.87
0.86
NA
0.27
3.46
4.42
NA
NA
1.64
1.02
                     6 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C



Number of
Site Samples Compound Nondetects
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
136
63
63
63
63
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
136
136
109
135
136
14
0
2
135
136
136
136
136
136
136
127
136
136
0
135
136
74
123
135
7
4
135
108
128
6
36
6
136
136
132
136
136
136
0
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
20%
1%
0%
90%
100%
99%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
100%
1%
0%
46%
10%
1%
95%
97%
1%
21%
6%
96%
74%
96%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.03
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.025
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.03
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.66
0.299
0.468
0.521
Highest
(ppbv)
0.05
0.06
0.52
0.08
0.03
0.07
1.31
0.39
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
1.06
0.06
0.03
3.81
0.61
0.04
0.41
0.10
0.03
0.28
0.57
0.24
0.12
0.08
0.25
0.07
0.22
0.03
0.04
0.18
0.03
0.03
0.03
10.36
4.79
0.92
1.11
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.26
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.38
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.17
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.48
0.80
0.60
0.69
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.30
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.53
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.19
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.93
1.02
0.62
0.70
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.27
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.40
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.16
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.56
0.83
0.62
0.69
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.15
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.06
0.00
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.11
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.73
0.81
0.08
0.12
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.75
0.00
NA
5.47
1.93
2.38
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.90
NA
NA
1.05
0.81
NA
0.94
4.24
0.00
1.64
1.67
2.09
3.96
6.60
1.65
9.53
1.47
NA
NA
3.42
NA
NA
NA
1.11
1.25
8.30
5.80
                     7 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
58
63
22
50
61
63
0
62
63
3
0
63
63
1
4
63
63
63
59
63
63
7
0
0
61
63
63
63
55
62
63
60
63
63
0
63
63
14
21
63
0
0
8%
0%
65%
21%
3%
0%
100%
2%
0%
95%
100%
0%
0%
98%
94%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
89%
100%
100%
3%
0%
0%
0%
13%
2%
0%
5%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
78%
67%
0%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.232
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.073
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.188
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.28
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.046
0.139
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.59
0.37
0.26
0.13
1.40
0.35
0.05
0.66
0.16
0.03
0.04
4.49
7.20
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.13
2.53
0.14
0.22
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.11
0.46
0.05
0.41
0.06
0.03
11.20
0.04
0.04
1.15
0.27
0.03
1.11
3.21
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.13
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.64
0.77
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.39
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.83
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.33
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.06
0.05
0.13
0.34
0.11
0.05
0.16
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.95
0.92
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.51
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.14
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.05
0.03
0.15
0.45
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.13
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.73
0.71
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.45
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.85
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.13
0.35
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.15
0.03
0.00
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.84
0.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.37
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
1.49
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.05
0.00
0.15
0.47
Coefficient of
Variation
0.00
NA
0.74
1.25
1.26
NA
2.24
3.53
NA
1.28
4.94
NA
NA
1.14
1.00
NA
NA
NA
5.80
NA
NA
2.16
1.39
4.12
3.10
NA
NA
NA
3.67
2.03
NA
1.88
NA
NA
0.77
NA
NA
0.68
1.07
NA
1.00
0.94
                     8 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
63
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
63
33
63
0
3
0
63
63
23
62
62
63
0
0
0
0
39
41
40
41
41
35
0
41
41
0
0
41
41
1
5
41
41
41
39
41
41
9
0
0
41
41
0%
48%
0%
100%
95%
100%
0%
0%
63%
2%
2%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
5%
0%
2%
0%
0%
15%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
98%
88%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
78%
100%
100%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.06
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.26
0.111
0.506
0.464
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.244
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.117
0.040
0.060
0.035
Highest
(ppbv)
0.04
0.45
0.03
1.33
0.46
1.23
0.03
0.04
0.32
0.03
0.12
0.03
2.44
0.86
0.76
0.76
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.04
16.78
0.99
0.11
0.05
22.19
0.16
0.03
0.04
0.57
1.51
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.63
0.12
0.06
0.04
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.16
0.04
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.61
0.28
0.59
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
2.47
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.30
0.62
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.20
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.20
0.06
0.17
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.69
0.29
0.61
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.86
0.33
0.11
0.05
5.73
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.29
0.64
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.23
0.09
0.06
0.04
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.16
0.05
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.63
0.27
0.61
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.20
0.32
0.11
0.05
1.91
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.26
0.50
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.21
0.08
0.06
0.04
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.21
0.07
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.37
0.13
0.06
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
2.75
0.12
0.00
0.00
6.96
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.79
NA
0.95
0.87
0.86
NA
NA
1.29
0.00
2.80
NA
1.89
2.25
10.46
8.43
0.00
NA
5.29
NA
NA
0.31
2.87
NA
NA
0.82
3.81
NA
NA
2.45
1.78
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
2.31
3.45
NA
NA
                     9 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA

Samples
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34

Compound
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
Number of
Nondetects
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
0
41
41
15
33
41
0
0
41
38
41
0
16
1
41
41
41
41
41
41
0
0
0
0
25
34
26
33
34
17
0
28
34
3
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
63%
20%
0%
100%
100%
0%
7%
0%
100%
61%
98%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
26%
0%
24%
3%
0%
50%
100%
18%
0%
91%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.55
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.176
0.605
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.22
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.33
0.210
0.528
0.433
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.237
0.11
0.05
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
17.07
0.04
0.04
0.31
0.07
0.03
1.09
3.86
0.04
0.19
0.03
1.42
0.15
0.28
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.85
1.35
0.94
0.72
0.03
0.03
0.17
0.05
0.04
195.72
0.83
0.87
0.05
0.52
Median
(ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.56
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.45
1.55
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.55
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.72
0.38
0.59
0.58
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.35
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.07
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.41
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.50
1.73
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.60
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.83
0.47
0.64
0.58
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
34.19
0.36
0.19
0.05
0.11
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.82
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.45
1.56
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.54
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.75
0.40
0.63
0.58
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
1.64
0.34
0.14
0.05
0.07
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.23
0.83
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.30
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.31
0.12
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
62.49
0.12
0.22
0.00
0.13
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.91
NA
NA
1.04
4.65
NA
2.12
2.09
NA
1.57
NA
2.02
2.14
1.35
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.12
1.50
5.43
9.31
0.00
NA
1.64
0.00
NA
0.55
2.89
0.90
NA
0.81
                     10 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
0
34
34
34
4
34
34
23
31
34
34
1
0
0
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
33
34
34
0
34
34
13
29
34
0
0
34
14
34
0
2
0
34
34
34
34
100%
0%
0%
0%
88%
0%
0%
32%
9%
0%
0%
97%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
62%
15%
0%
100%
100%
0%
59%
0%
100%
94%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.188
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.22
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.080
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.03
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.24
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.73
0.05
0.05
0.84
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.06
0.72
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.18
0.06
0.03
5.16
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.06
0.03
0.21
0.59
0.04
0.16
0.03
0.24
0.08
0.23
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.75
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.29
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.91
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.25
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.73
0.05
0.05
0.18
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.32
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.33
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.25
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.11
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.58
0.05
0.05
0.11
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.30
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.98
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.23
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.10
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.11
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.10
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
3.16
NA
NA
NA
1.91
NA
NA
0.83
0.00
NA
NA
6.00
2.99
3.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.28
NA
NA
1.20
NA
NA
1.68
5.35
NA
2.67
2.37
NA
1.67
NA
2.56
4.89
2.09
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     11 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
CLIA
CLIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
34
34
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
34
34
0
1
0
1
63
73
53
73
73
72
0
71
73
13
0
73
73
69
12
73
73
73
66
73
73
11
0
0
73
73
72
73
72
73
73
73
73
73
0
73
0%
0%
100%
99%
100%
99%
14%
0%
27%
0%
0%
1%
100%
3%
0%
82%
100%
0%
0%
5%
84%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
85%
100%
100%
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.030
0.030
0.31
0.025
0.520
0.030
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.020
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.155
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.15
0.040
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
7.65
2.32
1.92
1.02
0.20
0.03
0.31
0.05
0.04
0.27
1.30
1.09
0.05
2.96
0.18
0.03
0.04
0.41
3.20
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.09
0.08
0.03
0.03
2.00
0.13
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
17.34
0.04
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.87
0.34
0.61
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.28
0.11
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.51
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.28
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.45
0.04
0.03
0.03
1.32
0.49
0.65
0.62
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.12
0.05
0.17
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.11
0.64
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.43
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.47
0.04
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.96
0.36
0.64
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.28
0.11
0.05
0.08
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.45
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.34
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.54
0.04
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
1.51
0.47
0.21
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.13
0.12
0.00
0.40
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.76
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.87
1.02
3.14
4.88
1.32
NA
0.94
NA
NA
7.55
2.31
1.01
NA
0.42
4.26
NA
NA
1.60
1.13
NA
NA
NA
2.31
NA
NA
0.00
1.08
3.60
NA
NA
0.00
NA
6.22
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.39
NA
                     12 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
73
43
61
73
2
1
73
49
73
2
21
1
73
73
72
73
72
73
0
1
0
0
35
40
21
40
40
38
0
28
39
2
0
40
40
40
4
40
40
40
37
40
0%
41%
16%
0%
97%
99%
0%
33%
0%
97%
71%
99%
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
100%
98%
100%
100%
13%
0%
48%
0%
0%
5%
100%
30%
3%
95%
100%
0%
0%
0%
90%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.025
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.03
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.48
0.025
0.531
0.480
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.238
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.074
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
Highest
(ppbv)
0.04
0.39
0.08
0.03
1.01
2.74
0.04
0.13
0.03
1.32
0.67
1.92
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.07
0.03
3.07
2.64
3.06
6.79
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.05
0.04
7.02
0.67
1.74
0.05
1.29
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.47
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.15
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.99
0.57
0.67
0.64
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.09
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.81
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.13
0.32
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.15
0.07
0.16
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.23
0.62
0.84
0.90
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.30
0.35
0.28
0.05
0.14
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.75
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.18
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.08
0.51
0.77
0.74
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.14
0.34
0.18
0.05
0.09
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.62
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.21
0.58
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.28
0.14
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.71
0.43
0.45
1.04
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
1.09
0.09
0.34
0.00
0.21
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.83
2.76
NA
0.60
0.55
NA
2.82
NA
0.52
0.50
0.39
NA
NA
0.00
NA
5.89
NA
1.73
1.46
1.85
0.87
0.00
NA
1.71
NA
NA
0.27
3.69
0.82
0.00
0.68
6.52
NA
NA
NA
2.38
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                     13 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DMA
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
39
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
40
7
0
2
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
37
40
40
0
40
40
23
22
40
0
0
40
21
40
0
2
1
40
40
39
40
40
40
0
0
0
0
61
74
3
73
0%
83%
100%
95%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
43%
45%
0%
100%
100%
0%
48%
0%
100%
95%
98%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
18%
0%
96%
1%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.030
0.222
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.24
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.100
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.03
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
1.30
0.380
0.190
0.137
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.06
0.75
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.23
0.06
0.03
3.53
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.27
0.03
0.24
0.58
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.26
0.10
0.27
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
15.19
3.65
0.79
0.81
0.03
0.03
0.67
0.05
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.41
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.71
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.28
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.13
0.04
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.68
1.21
0.59
0.65
0.03
0.03
0.14
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.44
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.95
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.12
0.30
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.13
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.76
1.46
0.58
0.62
0.03
0.03
0.19
0.05
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.42
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.77
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.11
0.27
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.96
1.28
0.56
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.15
0.05
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.05
0.13
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.33
0.80
0.10
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
6.48
2.96
3.15
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.42
NA
NA
1.41
NA
NA
2.24
0.91
NA
2.35
2.28
NA
6.48
NA
2.40
2.67
1.79
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
1.13
1.84
6.01
5.05
0.00
NA
1.32
0.00
                     14 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
73
68
0
72
73
0
0
74
74
74
2
74
74
74
60
74
74
9
0
0
74
74
74
74
68
74
74
69
74
74
0
74
74
3
14
74
0
0
74
5
74
0
1%
8%
100%
3%
1%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
97%
0%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
88%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
96%
81%
0%
100%
100%
0%
93%
0%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.040
0.125
0.083
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.321
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.73
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.129
0.132
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.15
Highest
(ppbv)
0.04
1.00
1.13
0.27
0.11
1.85
0.15
0.03
0.04
0.09
3.99
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.13
0.08
0.03
0.06
2.86
0.13
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.12
0.09
0.05
0.72
0.06
0.03
6.91
0.04
0.04
0.35
0.25
0.03
1.07
3.05
0.04
0.29
0.03
1.35
Median
(ppbv)
0.04
0.13
0.33
0.11
0.05
0.21
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.89
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.11
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.03
0.28
0.78
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.36
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.18
0.35
0.11
0.05
0.27
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.22
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.06
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
2.38
0.04
0.04
0.13
0.06
0.03
0.35
0.98
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.45
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.14
0.33
0.11
0.05
0.21
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.04
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.94
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.09
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.05
0.03
0.31
0.86
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.40
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.19
0.13
0.02
0.01
0.25
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
1.29
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.05
0.00
0.19
0.54
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.23
Coefficient of
Variation
0.00
0.93
2.73
5.74
6.83
1.06
4.97
NA
NA
NA
1.85
NA
NA
NA
1.89
NA
NA
7.88
1.86
2.37
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.11
NA
NA
1.84
NA
NA
1.81
1.27
NA
1.84
1.80
NA
1.54
NA
1.94
                     15 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI

Samples
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
288
289
289
289
288
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289

Compound
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
74
74
37
74
74
74
0
0
0
0
249
289
60
279
278
193
1
287
289
5
0
288
289
223
40
289
288
289
246
289
289
37
0
0
289
289
289
289
263
289
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
14%
0%
79%
3%
4%
33%
100%
1%
0%
98%
100%
0%
0%
23%
86%
0%
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
87%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.07
0.208
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.560
0.139
0.460
0.408
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.02
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.070
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.230
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
Highest
(ppbv)
0.52
1.49
0.03
0.04
0.19
0.03
0.03
0.03
6.48
5.59
1.08
0.96
0.03
0.03
0.22
0.09
0.31
21.59
1.03
0.11
0.05
61.71
0.21
0.03
0.04
0.59
2.57
0.05
0.34
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.03
0.13
2.17
0.17
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
15.17
0.09
Median
(ppbv)
0.19
0.55
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.52
0.76
0.62
0.58
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.56
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.70
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.57
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.20
0.57
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.64
1.13
0.63
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
1.64
0.32
0.11
0.05
2.59
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.11
0.74
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.64
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.22
0.09
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.19
0.53
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.49
0.83
0.62
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.33
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.65
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.50
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.58
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
Standard
Deviation
0.08
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.72
1.68
0.07
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.04
2.12
0.08
0.00
0.00
7.80
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.46
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.35
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.61
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
2.38
2.31
NA
NA
2.69
NA
NA
NA
2.28
0.68
8.53
7.57
0.00
NA
1.17
12.86
1.02
0.77
3.97
0.00
NA
0.33
4.43
9.03
NA
1.25
1.58
NA
NA
NA
5.38
NA
NA
2.08
1.83
5.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.14
NA
                     16 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Site Samples Compound Nondetects
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
289
288
289
289
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
289
249
289
289
0
289
289
101
112
286
4
0
288
129
289
1
12
2
289
289
221
288
289
289
0
0
0
0
22
34
18
33
34
30
0
32
34
0
0
34
34
34
Frequency
of Detects
0%
14%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
65%
61%
1%
99%
100%
0%
55%
0%
100%
96%
99%
0%
0%
24%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
35%
0%
47%
3%
0%
12%
100%
6%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.200
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.100
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.03
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.574
0.274
0.535
0.526
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.25
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.080
0.030
0.040
0.090
Highest
(ppbv)
0.05
0.74
0.06
0.03
6.43
0.04
0.04
0.22
0.63
0.03
0.65
1.89
0.77
0.17
0.03
0.90
0.90
0.85
0.03
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.43
1.31
0.75
1.16
0.03
0.03
0.20
0.05
0.04
25.42
0.53
0.40
0.05
4.30
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.09
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.07
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.18
0.52
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.21
0.04
0.21
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.16
0.58
0.62
0.67
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.25
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.11
0.05
0.03
1.19
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.19
0.57
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.23
0.08
0.23
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.43
0.67
0.62
0.69
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
1.78
0.31
0.12
0.05
0.57
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
1.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.16
0.48
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.19
0.06
0.19
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.28
0.61
0.62
0.68
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.19
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.31
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
1.18
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.14
0.45
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.19
0.08
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.71
0.28
0.06
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
5.92
0.07
0.06
0.00
0.81
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.87
NA
NA
1.01
NA
NA
1.05
0.96
0.00
1.35
1.25
NA
2.22
NA
1.19
0.93
1.57
NA
NA
3.68
NA
NA
NA
2.01
2.35
11.06
5.83
0.00
NA
1.32
0.00
NA
0.30
4.68
2.03
NA
0.70
9.81
NA
NA
NA
                     17 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C



Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
ELNJ
ELNJ
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
66
66
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
2
34
34
34
32
34
34
1
0
0
34
34
34
34
33
34
34
33
34
34
0
34
34
12
13
34
0
0
34
9
33
0
0
0
34
34
34
34
34
34
0
0
94%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
97%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
65%
62%
0%
100%
100%
0%
74%
3%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.277
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.361
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.055
0.158
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.07
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.703
0.450
Highest
(ppbv)
2.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.08
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.27
0.06
0.03
2.49
0.04
0.04
0.21
0.75
0.03
0.39
1.02
0.04
1.19
0.03
0.47
0.44
0.63
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
7.89
19.18
Median
(ppbv)
0.68
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.44
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.90
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.12
0.31
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.15
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.94
2.31
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.76
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.50
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.98
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.17
0.03
0.15
0.38
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.17
0.07
0.17
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.28
4.24
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.62
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.47
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.83
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.13
0.33
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.15
0.05
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.98
2.67
Standard
Deviation
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.21
0.00
0.08
0.22
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.10
0.08
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.41
4.46
Coefficient of
Variation
1.68
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
2.74
2.87
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
2.40
NA
NA
1.73
NA
NA
1.33
0.81
NA
1.77
1.73
NA
0.46
0.00
1.78
0.81
1.25
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.62
0.95
                     18 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
65
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
0
0
59
66
8
62
63
66
1
66
66
0
0
66
66
2
2
66
66
66
55
66
66
4
0
0
55
66
66
66
48
66
66
61
66
66
0
66
66
7
25
66
100%
100%
11%
0%
88%
6%
5%
0%
98%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
97%
97%
0%
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
94%
100%
100%
17%
0%
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
89%
62%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.460
0.426
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.02
0.11
0.050
0.062
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.259
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.378
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
1.06
1.05
0.03
0.03
0.47
0.11
0.18
0.13
0.86
0.11
0.05
1.92
0.53
0.03
0.04
7.05
4.69
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.07
1.56
0.12
0.18
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.12
0.09
0.05
0.48
0.06
0.03
3.68
0.04
0.04
0.53
0.23
0.03
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.65
0.66
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.31
0.10
0.03
0.04
1.57
1.00
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.53
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.15
0.04
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.66
0.65
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.35
0.11
0.05
0.40
0.11
0.03
0.04
1.91
1.15
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.60
0.08
0.07
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
1.40
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.06
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.66
0.64
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.31
0.10
0.03
0.04
1.47
0.98
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.56
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.20
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.06
0.00
0.00
1.34
0.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.25
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.04
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
6.38
6.71
0.00
NA
1.33
4.63
2.21
NA
2.87
NA
NA
1.22
1.90
NA
NA
1.42
1.71
NA
NA
NA
3.23
NA
NA
4.11
2.45
2.98
2.64
NA
NA
NA
3.14
NA
NA
1.43
NA
NA
1.73
NA
NA
1.35
1.37
NA
                     19 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
0
0
66
33
66
1
1
1
66
66
33
66
66
66
0
0
0
0
35
42
3
42
41
42
0
39
42
10
0
42
42
19
1
42
42
42
40
42
42
5
0
0
100%
100%
0%
50%
0%
98%
98%
98%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
17%
0%
93%
0%
2%
0%
100%
7%
0%
76%
100%
0%
0%
55%
98%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
88%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.069
0.161
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.03
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.596
0.300
0.440
0.520
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.26
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.074
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.315
0.040
Highest
(ppbv)
0.48
1.39
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.62
0.21
0.57
0.03
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.03
11.85
2.46
0.85
0.94
0.03
0.03
0.49
0.05
0.20
0.13
1.63
1.45
0.05
0.91
0.17
0.03
0.04
0.53
4.37
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.11
2.69
0.14
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.18
0.51
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.24
0.04
0.19
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.81
1.07
0.62
0.68
0.03
0.03
0.13
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.39
0.11
0.05
0.05
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.52
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.80
0.09
0.20
0.57
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.26
0.07
0.21
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.75
1.18
0.64
0.68
0.03
0.03
0.19
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.44
0.15
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.21
1.61
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.01
0.08
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.18
0.50
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.23
0.06
0.18
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.83
1.02
0.63
0.68
0.03
0.03
0.14
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.40
0.12
0.05
0.06
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.16
1.36
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.86
0.07
Standard
Deviation
0.10
0.29
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.12
0.04
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.10
0.63
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.25
0.22
0.00
0.14
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.88
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.59
0.03
Coefficient of
Variation
2.12
1.98
NA
2.81
NA
2.07
1.50
1.86
NA
NA
4.54
NA
NA
NA
1.21
1.88
6.72
7.52
0.00
NA
1.33
NA
1.77
NA
1.73
0.70
NA
0.68
4.26
NA
NA
1.31
1.84
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
2.20
1.72
2.54
                     20 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO

Samples
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
101

Compound
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
Number of
Nondetects
42
42
42
42
32
39
42
25
42
42
0
42
42
6
32
42
0
0
42
7
42
0
0
0
42
42
6
42
42
42
0
0
0
0
83
102
15
102
100
95
0
88
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
24%
7%
0%
40%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
86%
24%
0%
100%
100%
0%
83%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
86%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
19%
0%
85%
0%
2%
7%
100%
13%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.395
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.067
0.179
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.08
0.035
0.075
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.898
0.215
0.469
0.437
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.21
0.11
Highest
(ppbv)
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.15
2.25
0.05
0.70
0.06
0.03
22.69
0.04
0.04
0.37
0.24
0.03
1.52
4.08
0.04
1.48
0.03
1.87
0.45
1.41
0.03
0.04
0.26
0.03
0.03
0.03
10.75
2.21
0.85
0.85
0.03
0.03
0.33
0.05
0.15
4.20
1.36
1.59
Median
(ppbv)
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.59
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.28
0.83
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.34
0.09
0.28
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.78
0.58
0.59
0.61
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.20
0.05
0.22
0.06
0.03
2.44
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.37
1.03
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.47
0.11
0.35
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.75
0.66
0.60
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.29
0.33
0.15
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.11
0.05
0.15
0.06
0.03
1.71
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.29
0.81
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.37
0.08
0.28
0.03
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.17
0.58
0.59
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.15
0.31
0.12
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.42
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
3.42
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.03
0.00
0.28
0.77
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.35
0.09
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.17
0.36
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.01
0.67
0.14
0.21
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.96
0.47
NA
1.16
NA
NA
0.71
NA
NA
1.21
1.10
NA
1.33
1.34
NA
0.43
NA
1.36
1.24
1.35
NA
NA
1.37
NA
NA
NA
1.27
1.85
8.95
8.49
0.00
NA
1.32
NA
3.64
0.43
2.36
0.68
                     21 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Site Samples Compound Nondetects
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
102
12
0
102
102
82
18
102
101
102
89
102
102
18
0
1
102
102
101
102
95
91
102
74
102
102
0
102
102
14
71
102
0
0
102
14
101
0
3
1
102
101
Frequency
of Detects
0%
88%
100%
0%
0%
20%
82%
0%
1%
0%
13%
0%
0%
82%
100%
99%
0%
0%
1%
0%
7%
11%
0%
27%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
86%
30%
0%
100%
100%
0%
86%
1%
100%
97%
99%
0%
1%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.050
0.030
0.076
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.215
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.700
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.143
0.311
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.12
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
Highest
(ppbv)
0.05
0.68
0.16
0.03
0.04
0.09
2.66
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.03
0.15
2.12
0.14
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.09
1.54
0.05
0.58
0.06
0.03
9.86
0.04
0.04
0.64
0.15
0.03
4.16
14.32
0.04
0.38
0.06
4.21
0.64
2.02
0.03
0.04
Median
(ppbv)
0.05
0.11
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.70
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.44
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.34
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.49
1.68
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.74
0.09
0.28
0.03
0.04
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.16
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.85
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.57
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.12
0.05
0.14
0.06
0.03
2.85
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.72
2.69
0.04
0.08
0.03
1.09
0.12
0.36
0.03
0.04
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.11
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.56
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.49
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.05
0.11
0.06
0.03
2.42
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.54
1.96
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.83
0.09
0.28
0.03
0.04
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.16
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.33
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.16
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
1.89
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.02
0.00
0.67
2.48
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.91
0.11
0.34
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
1.03
5.18
NA
NA
0.00
1.36
NA
0.00
NA
4.03
NA
NA
1.86
1.71
2.58
NA
NA
0.00
NA
3.65
0.77
NA
1.07
NA
NA
1.50
NA
NA
0.97
1.61
NA
1.08
1.08
NA
1.03
8.80
1.19
1.03
1.05
NA
0.00
                     22 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Site Samples Compound Nondetects
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
102
102
102
102
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
90
102
102
102
0
0
0
1
40
48
8
48
48
35
0
48
48
13
0
48
48
25
14
48
48
48
37
48
48
10
0
2
48
48
48
48
48
42
48
48
48
48
Frequency
of Detects
12%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
98%
17%
0%
83%
0%
0%
27%
100%
0%
0%
73%
100%
0%
0%
48%
71%
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
0%
79%
100%
96%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.827
0.234
0.476
0.030
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.23
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.077
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.274
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
Highest
(ppbv)
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
82.59
2.65
0.74
2.16
0.03
0.03
0.41
0.05
0.04
84.04
1.42
0.11
0.05
0.60
0.17
0.03
0.04
2.13
4.96
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.03
1.13
2.72
0.13
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.53
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
Median
(ppbv)
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
4.65
0.66
0.59
0.61
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.03
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.61
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.76
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
12.86
0.75
0.59
0.70
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.05
0.04
8.87
0.37
0.11
0.05
0.10
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.42
0.74
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.11
0.83
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.11
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
Geometric Standard
Mean (ppbv) Deviation
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
5.38
0.65
0.59
0.63
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.37
0.34
0.11
0.05
0.06
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.19
0.40
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.75
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.15
0.44
0.06
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
24.79
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.58
0.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.43
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
0.00
NA
NA
NA
0.67
1.71
10.39
2.06
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.36
1.85
NA
NA
0.83
4.51
NA
NA
0.72
0.81
NA
NA
NA
2.57
NA
NA
0.41
1.95
2.22
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.49
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     23 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS

Samples
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13

Compound
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
Number of
Nondetects
0
48
48
8
34
48
0
0
48
14
48
0
1
1
43
48
45
48
48
48
0
0
0
0
13
13
3
13
13
9
0
13
13
3
0
13
13
1
2
13
13
13
Frequency
of Detects
100%
0%
0%
83%
29%
0%
100%
100%
0%
71%
0%
100%
98%
98%
10%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
77%
0%
0%
31%
100%
0%
0%
77%
100%
0%
0%
92%
85%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.746
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.103
0.201
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.06
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.493
0.291
0.477
0.520
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.22
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.089
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
Highest
(ppbv)
33.26
0.04
0.04
1.02
0.08
0.03
10.68
33.98
0.04
0.17
0.03
9.69
0.28
0.84
0.10
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.56
1.60
0.69
1.03
0.03
0.03
0.21
0.05
0.04
134.06
0.60
0.11
0.05
0.23
0.16
0.03
0.04
4.70
2.06
0.05
0.05
0.06
Median
(ppbv)
2.85
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.03
0.63
2.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.69
0.07
0.22
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.39
0.53
0.62
0.85
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.03
0.12
0.03
0.04
2.88
0.62
0.05
0.05
0.06
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
4.07
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.03
0.98
3.24
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.98
0.08
0.25
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.60
0.63
0.59
0.79
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.05
0.04
12.66
0.33
0.11
0.05
0.09
0.12
0.03
0.04
2.73
0.72
0.05
0.05
0.06
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
2.86
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.58
1.93
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.65
0.07
0.22
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.43
0.55
0.59
0.78
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.51
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.06
0.12
0.03
0.04
2.13
0.52
0.05
0.05
0.06
Standard
Deviation
5.16
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.01
0.00
1.67
5.32
0.00
0.04
0.00
1.48
0.05
0.14
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.37
0.07
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
37.03
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.02
0.00
0.00
1.25
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
0.79
NA
NA
0.75
3.10
NA
0.59
0.61
NA
1.57
NA
0.66
1.55
1.74
2.25
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
2.01
1.71
8.20
5.84
NA
NA
1.20
NA
NA
0.34
3.56
NA
NA
1.15
5.91
NA
NA
2.19
1.37
NA
NA
NA
                     24 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS

Samples
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
24
24
24
24
24
24

Compound
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Number of
Nondetects
13
13
13
1
0
1
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
0
13
13
2
10
13
0
0
13
3
13
0
0
0
6
13
1
13
13
13
0
0
0
0
21
24
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
92%
100%
92%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
85%
23%
0%
100%
100%
0%
77%
0%
100%
100%
100%
54%
0%
92%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
13%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.178
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.670
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.100
0.306
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.12
0.035
0.113
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.56
0.252
0.481
0.460
0.025
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.12
1.08
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
6.75
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.66
2.06
0.04
0.28
0.03
0.72
0.20
0.74
0.13
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.03
0.03
5.31
2.34
0.78
0.89
0.03
0.03
Median
(ppbv)
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.49
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.79
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.36
1.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.31
0.07
0.27
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.51
0.54
0.66
0.65
0.03
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.05
0.53
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.88
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.35
1.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.36
0.09
0.32
0.05
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.01
0.77
0.65
0.67
0.03
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.48
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.34
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.31
0.92
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.32
0.07
0.26
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.76
0.66
0.65
0.66
0.03
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.24
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.85
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.49
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.17
0.06
0.21
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.18
0.50
0.08
0.10
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
1.44
2.25
3.51
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.56
NA
NA
1.68
0.00
NA
2.12
2.12
NA
1.04
NA
2.13
1.45
1.54
1.39
NA
1.76
NA
NA
NA
1.69
1.55
7.90
6.53
0.00
ND
                     25 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
2
24
24
20
0
23
24
3
0
24
24
0
1
24
24
24
14
24
24
3
0
0
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
0
24
24
2
11
24
0
0
24
1
92%
0%
0%
17%
100%
0%
0%
88%
100%
0%
0%
100%
96%
0%
0%
0%
42%
0%
0%
88%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
92%
54%
0%
100%
100%
0%
96%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.270
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.082
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.371
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
1.04
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.390
1.502
0.040
0.035
Highest
(ppbv)
0.37
0.05
0.04
41.16
1.17
0.11
0.05
0.36
0.27
0.03
0.04
3.45
1.86
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.11
0.08
0.03
0.10
1.25
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
11.36
0.04
0.04
0.15
0.24
0.03
4.35
15.51
0.04
0.13
Median
(ppbv)
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.38
0.11
0.05
0.08
0.11
0.03
0.04
1.49
0.64
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.52
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
4.30
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.52
5.74
0.04
0.05
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.10
0.05
0.04
5.31
0.43
0.11
0.05
0.11
0.12
0.03
0.04
1.32
0.69
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.62
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
5.30
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.07
0.03
2.16
8.17
0.04
0.06
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.31
0.40
0.11
0.05
0.07
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.63
0.58
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.58
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
4.49
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.05
0.03
1.71
6.43
0.04
0.05
Standard Coefficient of
Deviation Variation
0.09
0.00
0.00
12.69
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.04
0.00
0.00
1.16
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.25
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.00
1.38
5.12
0.00
0.03
1.10
ND
ND
0.42
2.24
ND
ND
1.06
3.03
ND
ND
1.14
1.73
ND
ND
ND
1.64
ND
ND
2.40
2.45
3.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00
ND
ND
1.76
ND
ND
2.20
0.99
ND
1.57
1.60
ND
2.18
                     26 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
41
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
41
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
24
1
0
0
16
24
2
23
24
24
1
0
0
0
37
42
3
42
42
38
0
41
42
0
0
42
42
37
5
42
42
42
37
42
42
4
0
0
42
42
42
42
0%
96%
100%
100%
33%
0%
92%
4%
0%
0%
98%
100%
100%
100%
12%
0%
93%
0%
0%
10%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
12%
88%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
90%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.030
0.03
0.04
0.080
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.07
0.478
0.490
0.430
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.230
0.11
0.05
0.075
0.085
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.390
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
5.18
2.89
0.62
0.26
0.04
0.20
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.60
1.11
0.65
0.63
0.03
0.03
0.15
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.68
0.15
0.03
0.04
0.09
3.86
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.80
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
Median
(ppbv)
0.03
1.71
0.08
0.25
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.59
0.80
0.57
0.58
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.28
0.11
0.05
0.11
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.10
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.62
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
2.36
0.21
0.30
0.05
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.60
0.78
0.56
0.56
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.27
0.11
0.05
0.19
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.17
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.62
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
1.71
0.10
0.27
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.19
0.75
0.56
0.56
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.27
0.11
0.05
0.15
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.53
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.60
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.00
1.53
0.57
0.13
0.06
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.79
0.22
0.04
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
ND
1.54
0.36
2.38
0.89
ND
1.71
0.00
ND
ND
2.03
3.58
12.68
9.37
0.00
NA
2.09
NA
NA
0.00
11.38
NA
NA
0.99
4.38
NA
NA
0.00
0.94
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
4.06
4.27
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     27 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA

Samples
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33

Compound
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
Number of
Nondetects
40
42
42
40
42
42
0
42
42
9
26
42
0
0
42
16
42
0
0
0
42
42
31
42
42
42
0
0
0
0
29
33
27
32
33
26
0
29
33
4
0
33
Frequency
of Detects
5%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
79%
38%
0%
100%
100%
0%
62%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
26%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
12%
0%
18%
3%
0%
21%
100%
12%
0%
88%
100%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.43
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.080
0.180
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.09
0.04
0.070
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.31
0.151
0.540
0.575
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.213
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.076
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.20
0.06
0.03
1.65
0.04
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.03
0.37
0.95
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.35
0.10
0.30
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.29
1.44
9.29
1.33
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.05
0.04
30.05
0.45
3.73
0.05
0.25
0.14
0.03
Median
(ppbv)
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.97
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.18
0.49
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.19
0.07
0.17
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.62
0.43
0.69
0.79
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.06
0.10
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.95
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.19
0.51
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.20
0.06
0.18
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.80
0.53
1.21
0.83
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
4.31
0.31
0.47
0.05
0.07
0.10
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.88
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.17
0.46
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.18
0.06
0.17
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.69
0.44
0.88
0.81
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.32
0.31
0.16
0.05
0.06
0.10
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.58
0.35
1.60
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
9.92
0.05
1.02
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
0.00
NA
NA
2.18
NA
NA
2.47
NA
NA
1.40
0.00
NA
2.07
2.14
NA
0.00
NA
2.53
2.35
2.51
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
1.38
1.50
0.75
4.24
0.00
NA
2.64
0.00
NA
0.43
6.57
0.46
NA
1.29
6.62
NA
                     28 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
33
33
3
33
33
33
27
33
33
5
0
0
33
33
33
33
32
33
33
24
33
33
0
33
33
19
31
33
0
0
33
13
33
1
8
1
33
33
33
33
33
33
0%
0%
91%
0%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
85%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
42%
6%
0%
100%
100%
0%
61%
0%
97%
76%
97%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.159
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.12
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.055
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.03
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.04
0.09
4.68
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.23
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.76
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
5.68
0.06
0.03
1.32
0.04
0.04
0.17
0.03
0.03
0.21
0.57
0.04
0.15
0.03
0.27
0.12
0.26
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.09
0.89
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.30
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.44
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.13
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.07
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.36
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.33
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.67
0.06
0.03
0.49
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.18
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.09
0.86
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.31
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.16
0.06
0.03
0.41
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.15
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
1.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.49
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.13
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.06
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
1.06
NA
NA
NA
0.83
NA
NA
0.00
2.46
3.30
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.45
NA
NA
1.59
NA
NA
1.16
0.00
NA
1.55
1.39
NA
1.74
NA
1.40
2.04
1.40
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     29 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
0
0
0
0
41
42
21
38
42
27
0
42
42
0
0
42
42
5
2
42
42
42
26
42
42
6
0
0
42
42
42
42
36
42
42
41
42
42
0
42
42
16
100%
100%
100%
100%
2%
0%
50%
10%
0%
36%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
88%
95%
0%
0%
0%
38%
0%
0%
86%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
62%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.463
0.192
0.410
0.390
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.22
0.11
0.050
0.093
0.077
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.136
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.747
0.040
0.040
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
3.71
1.74
0.84
0.83
0.03
0.03
0.23
0.23
0.04
183.61
0.69
0.11
0.05
41.18
10.08
0.03
0.04
1.92
3.20
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.03
0.20
0.67
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.13
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
19.37
0.04
0.04
0.94
Median
(ppbv)
1.17
0.60
0.60
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.33
0.11
0.05
0.81
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.52
1.08
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.32
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.75
0.04
0.04
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
1.22
0.72
0.61
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
6.35
0.34
0.11
0.05
4.29
0.35
0.03
0.04
0.63
1.07
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.33
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
4.43
0.04
0.04
0.10
Geometric Standard Coefficient of
Mean (ppbv) Deviation Variation
1.12
0.62
0.60
0.58
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.48
0.33
0.11
0.05
1.15
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.47
0.86
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.31
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
3.24
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.57
0.39
0.07
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.03
0.00
28.44
0.08
0.00
0.00
8.76
1.54
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.12
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.87
0.00
0.00
0.21
2.15
1.84
8.49
7.10
0.00
NA
1.17
1.71
NA
0.22
4.14
NA
NA
0.49
0.23
NA
NA
1.40
1.70
NA
NA
NA
1.95
NA
NA
1.34
2.82
2.99
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.20
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
1.14
NA
NA
0.50
                     30 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
42
42
42
42
42
42
41
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
15
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
19
42
0
0
42
16
41
0
3
0
42
42
32
42
42
42
0
0
0
0
13
13
1
12
13
11
1
11
13
4
0
13
13
7
0
13
13
13
13
13
5
4
55%
0%
100%
100%
0%
62%
0%
100%
93%
100%
0%
0%
24%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
92%
8%
0%
15%
92%
15%
0%
69%
100%
0%
0%
46%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
62%
69%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.030
0.030
0.318
1.098
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.46
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.790
0.425
0.419
0.482
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.02
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.090
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.17
0.03
8.34
29.55
0.04
0.11
0.03
8.10
0.09
0.30
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.18
1.83
0.77
1.17
0.03
0.03
6.25
0.05
0.04
8.85
2.10
1.13
0.05
4.46
0.17
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.25
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
1.65
0.09
Median
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
1.27
4.65
0.04
0.04
0.03
1.70
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.65
0.67
0.65
0.80
0.03
0.03
0.24
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.56
0.11
0.05
0.03
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.76
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.14
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.03
1.96
7.27
0.04
0.05
0.03
2.24
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.75
0.90
0.64
0.82
0.03
0.03
1.06
0.05
0.04
0.96
0.64
0.19
0.05
0.56
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.72
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.43
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.03
1.38
5.09
0.04
0.04
0.03
1.74
0.04
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.59
0.81
0.63
0.80
0.03
0.03
0.28
0.05
0.04
0.22
0.45
0.13
0.05
0.09
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.63
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.17
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.03
0.00
1.73
6.34
0.00
0.03
0.00
1.65
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.79
0.47
0.09
0.21
0.00
0.00
1.98
0.00
0.00
2.44
0.51
0.28
0.00
1.31
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.52
0.02
Coefficient of
Variation
1.35
NA
1.13
1.15
NA
1.93
NA
1.36
2.47
2.42
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
2.21
1.94
7.21
3.98
NA
NA
0.54
0.00
NA
0.39
1.24
0.68
NA
0.43
5.23
NA
NA
0.00
2.71
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.83
2.23
                     31 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ

Samples
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
33
33
33
33
32
33
33
33
33
33

Compound
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
13
13
13
13
12
13
13
13
13
13
0
13
13
1
11
13
0
0
13
2
13
0
0
0
13
13
11
13
13
13
0
0
0
0
29
33
5
32
31
26
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
92%
15%
0%
100%
100%
0%
85%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
9%
0%
85%
3%
6%
21%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.360
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
2.317
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.783
2.847
0.040
0.035
0.03
1.18
0.035
0.150
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.723
0.646
0.587
0.619
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
Highest
(ppbv)
1.13
0.13
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
17.18
0.04
0.04
1.33
0.37
0.03
5.90
22.46
0.04
0.49
0.03
7.52
0.28
0.76
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
8.34
4.93
1.16
0.95
0.03
0.03
0.66
0.20
0.18
4.89
Median
(ppbv)
0.58
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
4.39
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.03
1.76
5.99
0.04
0.04
0.03
2.03
0.12
0.36
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.15
1.25
0.71
0.73
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.05
0.04
0.13
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.68
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
5.64
0.04
0.04
0.18
0.07
0.03
2.08
7.79
0.04
0.08
0.03
2.73
0.12
0.40
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.87
1.73
0.76
0.75
0.03
0.03
0.19
0.05
0.05
0.38
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.64
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
4.80
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.03
1.78
6.62
0.04
0.06
0.03
2.39
0.10
0.36
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.21
1.46
0.75
0.74
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.05
0.04
0.18
Standard
Deviation
0.25
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.98
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.10
0.00
1.36
5.21
0.00
0.12
0.00
1.67
0.08
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.17
1.12
0.15
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.03
0.02
0.90
Coefficient of
Variation
2.66
3.54
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.01
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.42
NA
NA
0.53
0.68
NA
1.53
1.50
NA
0.69
NA
1.64
1.62
2.14
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
1.32
1.54
5.16
9.99
0.00
NA
1.02
1.79
1.84
0.43
                     32 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
0
32
33
0
0
33
33
3
0
33
33
33
7
33
33
0
0
0
14
33
33
33
24
31
33
14
33
33
0
33
33
2
6
33
0
0
33
2
33
0
0
0
100%
3%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
91%
100%
0%
0%
0%
79%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
58%
0%
0%
0%
27%
6%
0%
58%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
94%
82%
0%
100%
100%
0%
94%
0%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.28
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.092
0.030
0.040
0.090
2.125
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.336
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.947
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.111
0.277
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.13
0.035
0.130
Highest
(ppbv)
0.95
2.38
0.05
1.27
0.21
0.03
0.04
8.81
6.07
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.22
0.08
0.03
0.09
2.59
0.12
0.78
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.20
2.80
0.05
0.41
0.06
0.03
6.87
0.04
0.04
0.33
0.44
0.03
1.03
2.93
0.04
0.66
0.03
1.26
0.32
1.02
Median
(ppbv)
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.18
0.15
0.03
0.04
1.15
4.06
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.76
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.24
0.06
0.03
2.10
0.04
0.04
0.10
0.09
0.03
0.30
0.83
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.34
0.10
0.31
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.36
0.17
0.05
0.24
0.14
0.03
0.04
1.75
4.03
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.08
0.03
0.06
0.94
0.10
0.16
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.17
0.05
0.21
0.06
0.03
2.71
0.04
0.04
0.13
0.14
0.03
0.39
1.09
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.48
0.13
0.41
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.35
0.12
0.05
0.17
0.14
0.03
0.04
1.05
3.91
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.05
0.79
0.09
0.11
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.05
0.17
0.06
0.03
2.25
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.09
0.03
0.32
0.87
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.38
0.10
0.34
Standard
Deviation
0.12
0.40
0.00
0.23
0.03
0.00
0.00
1.92
0.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.61
0.02
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.47
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
1.71
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.12
0.00
0.27
0.74
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.32
0.09
0.26
Coefficient of
Variation
3.09
0.44
NA
1.05
5.48
NA
NA
0.91
4.28
NA
NA
NA
1.26
NA
NA
2.77
1.56
5.63
0.96
NA
NA
NA
1.39
0.37
NA
1.66
NA
NA
1.58
NA
NA
1.57
1.15
NA
1.49
1.47
NA
0.82
NA
1.48
1.38
1.56
                     33 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
33
33
33
33
33
33
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
33
33
2
33
33
33
0
5
0
0
25
27
26
27
25
24
0
6
27
11
1
27
27
24
5
27
27
27
26
27
27
2
0
0
27
27
27
27
16
27
27
24
0%
0%
94%
0%
0%
0%
100%
81%
100%
100%
7%
0%
4%
0%
7%
11%
100%
78%
0%
59%
96%
0%
0%
11%
81%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
93%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
41%
0%
0%
11%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.07
0.03
0.52
0.57
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.25
0.11
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.08
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.04
0.32
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.88
0.40
4.28
1.32
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.05
0.97
1.98
1.56
60.11
0.05
0.22
0.19
0.03
0.04
0.18
2.88
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.38
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
1.74
0.09
0.05
0.37
Median
(ppbv)
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.22
0.10
0.59
0.62
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.31
2.80
0.05
0.03
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.78
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.29
0.11
0.75
0.66
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.07
0.28
0.38
6.01
0.05
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.08
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.14
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.11
0.09
0.05
0.09
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.24
0.09
0.65
0.65
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.16
0.34
1.83
0.05
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.67
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.13
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.08
Standard Coefficient of
Deviation Variation
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.08
0.71
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.18
0.47
0.27
11.52
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.06
NA
NA
1.34
NA
NA
NA
1.60
1.41
1.05
4.60
0.00
NA
2.90
NA
0.42
0.60
1.41
0.52
NA
1.11
3.79
NA
NA
5.35
1.31
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
2.98
2.15
5.43
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.34
NA
NA
1.53
                     34 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI

Samples
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21

Compound
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
Number of
Nondetects
27
27
0
27
27
19
25
27
3
1
27
21
27
4
18
1
27
27
20
27
27
27
0
0
0
0
18
21
5
20
21
21
0
20
21
1
0
21
21
16
2
21
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
30%
7%
0%
89%
96%
0%
22%
0%
85%
33%
96%
0%
0%
26%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
14%
0%
76%
5%
0%
0%
100%
5%
0%
95%
100%
0%
0%
24%
90%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.06
0.03
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.480
0.211
0.386
0.363
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.19
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.079
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
Highest
(ppbv)
0.06
0.03
3.47
0.04
0.04
0.50
0.10
0.03
0.10
0.17
0.04
0.30
0.03
0.12
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.16
0.03
0.03
0.03
4.82
3.52
0.82
0.88
0.03
0.03
0.27
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.46
0.11
0.05
0.91
0.16
0.03
0.04
0.09
2.71
0.05
Median
(ppbv)
0.06
0.03
0.34
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.38
0.81
0.62
0.62
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.14
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.78
0.05
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.06
0.03
0.55
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.11
1.07
0.62
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.18
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.90
0.05
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.06
0.03
0.35
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.72
0.77
0.61
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.12
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.66
0.05
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.38
0.90
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.81
NA
NA
0.69
2.42
NA
1.58
1.79
NA
0.89
NA
1.45
0.00
4.36
NA
NA
2.28
NA
NA
NA
1.52
1.18
6.71
6.42
0.00
NA
1.15
0.00
NA
NA
4.72
0.00
NA
0.95
4.96
NA
NA
0.00
1.35
NA
                     35 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C



Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
45
41
41
41
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
21
21
20
21
21
1
0
0
21
21
21
21
17
21
21
19
21
21
0
21
21
7
10
21
0
0
21
4
21
0
1
0
21
21
15
21
21
21
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
95%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
67%
52%
0%
100%
100%
0%
81%
0%
100%
95%
100%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.248
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.372
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.059
0.136
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.07
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.617
0.190
0.530
0.463
Highest
(ppbv)
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.21
2.05
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.32
0.09
0.05
0.38
0.06
0.03
3.52
0.04
0.04
0.14
0.31
0.03
0.54
1.71
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.71
0.23
0.70
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
9.24
3.28
0.92
0.79
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.54
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.21
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.19
0.53
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.23
0.04
0.22
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.16
0.42
0.63
0.59
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.84
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.09
0.05
0.10
0.06
0.03
1.59
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.03
0.24
0.68
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.29
0.09
0.27
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.75
0.56
0.65
0.60
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.69
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
1.28
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.19
0.52
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.22
0.07
0.20
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.38
0.46
0.65
0.60
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.54
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.00
0.16
0.50
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.21
0.06
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.68
0.52
0.08
0.08
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.98
1.57
6.06
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.79
NA
NA
1.21
NA
NA
1.58
NA
NA
1.47
0.87
NA
1.46
1.37
NA
3.33
NA
1.40
1.33
1.37
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
1.04
1.09
8.41
7.23
                     36 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
33
41
15
36
40
41
0
39
41
1
0
41
41
5
1
41
41
41
25
41
41
2
0
0
41
41
41
41
23
40
41
33
41
41
0
41
41
24
27
25
0
0
20%
0%
63%
12%
2%
0%
100%
5%
0%
98%
100%
0%
0%
88%
98%
0%
0%
0%
39%
0%
0%
95%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
44%
2%
0%
20%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
41%
34%
39%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.25
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.071
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.170
0.080
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.360
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.100
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.47
0.11
0.25
0.13
0.92
0.62
0.05
1.31
0.18
0.03
0.04
2.48
3.92
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.28
0.08
0.03
0.07
2.18
0.14
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.20
0.25
0.05
1.12
0.06
0.03
3.70
0.04
0.04
0.17
0.11
0.52
0.61
1.69
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.18
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.50
0.98
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.34
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.71
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.26
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.13
0.33
0.12
0.05
0.22
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.58
1.29
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.42
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.15
0.06
0.03
0.94
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.15
0.38
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.17
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.44
1.02
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.37
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.10
0.06
0.03
0.80
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.12
0.31
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.21
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.31
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.10
0.11
0.30
Coefficient of
Variation
0.00
NA
0.80
4.40
1.36
NA
3.14
1.46
NA
1.05
3.67
NA
NA
1.22
1.43
NA
NA
NA
0.83
NA
NA
3.04
1.35
7.24
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.27
3.67
NA
0.66
NA
NA
1.35
NA
NA
1.40
1.83
0.76
1.36
1.28
                     37 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S2MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
40
19
41
0
4
0
40
41
9
38
41
41
0
0
0
0
35
41
7
39
40
40
0
38
41
2
0
41
41
5
1
41
41
41
30
41
41
5
0
0
37
41
2%
54%
0%
100%
90%
100%
2%
0%
78%
7%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
15%
0%
83%
5%
2%
2%
100%
7%
0%
95%
100%
0%
0%
88%
98%
0%
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
88%
100%
100%
10%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.03
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.757
0.308
0.568
0.482
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.25
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.071
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.242
0.083
0.060
0.035
Highest
(ppbv)
0.08
0.33
0.03
0.71
0.24
0.67
0.03
0.04
0.66
0.07
0.03
0.03
6.43
2.37
0.91
0.82
0.03
0.03
0.34
0.12
0.36
0.13
0.59
0.11
0.05
6.19
0.17
0.03
0.04
3.00
2.34
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.09
1.37
0.16
0.06
0.04
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.11
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.29
0.56
0.66
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.11
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.79
0.83
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.41
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.15
0.05
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.13
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.70
0.68
0.68
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.13
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.29
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.91
0.94
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.48
0.10
0.06
0.04
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.13
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.47
0.59
0.68
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.12
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.67
0.79
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.45
0.10
0.06
0.04
Standard
Deviation
0.01
0.06
0.00
0.12
0.04
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.01
0.00
0.00
1.25
0.47
0.09
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.95
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.64
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.22
0.01
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
6.56
0.97
NA
1.30
1.24
1.15
0.00
NA
0.80
4.96
NA
NA
1.36
1.45
7.29
8.55
0.00
NA
0.92
4.00
0.95
0.00
5.49
0.00
NA
0.30
3.90
NA
NA
1.42
1.81
NA
NA
NA
4.02
NA
NA
2.70
2.19
7.43
0.00
NA
                     38 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
S3MO
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD

Samples
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77

Compound
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
Number of
Nondetects
41
41
27
40
41
34
41
41
0
41
41
14
27
30
0
0
41
25
41
0
1
0
41
41
12
40
41
41
0
0
0
0
63
77
61
69
77
76
0
63
73
13
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
34%
2%
0%
17%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
66%
34%
27%
100%
100%
0%
39%
0%
100%
98%
100%
0%
0%
71%
2%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
18%
0%
21%
10%
0%
1%
100%
18%
5%
83%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.587
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.098
0.250
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.12
0.035
0.110
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.292
0.092
0.270
0.260
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.140
0.105
0.050
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.16
0.27
0.05
0.39
0.06
0.03
5.18
0.04
0.04
0.24
1.54
0.26
0.61
1.65
0.04
0.23
0.03
0.73
0.26
0.84
0.03
0.04
0.29
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.82
1.11
460.46
0.84
0.05
0.03
0.15
0.10
0.04
0.33
2.81
1.14
0.35
2.50
Median
(ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.89
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.15
0.39
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.18
0.04
0.21
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.83
0.29
0.58
0.62
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
1.22
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.09
0.05
0.20
0.53
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.23
0.08
0.27
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.94
0.36
24.08
0.61
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.39
0.21
0.06
0.15
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
1.03
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.17
0.46
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.20
0.06
0.23
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.81
0.31
0.93
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.33
0.15
0.05
0.06
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.97
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.24
0.05
0.13
0.34
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.15
0.06
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.22
99.46
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.37
0.26
0.06
0.34
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
1.85
3.28
NA
1.47
NA
NA
1.26
NA
NA
1.15
0.38
0.93
1.57
1.54
NA
1.26
NA
1.57
1.29
1.50
NA
NA
1.31
0.00
NA
NA
1.71
1.62
0.24
5.48
8.89
NA
1.66
7.93
NA
5.41
1.06
0.82
1.11
0.43
                     39 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
0
77
77
77
11
77
77
77
77
77
77
17
0
1
77
77
77
77
73
77
77
71
77
77
0
77
77
37
72
77
2
1
77
40
77
2
13
4
77
77
77
77
100%
0%
0%
0%
86%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
78%
100%
99%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
52%
6%
0%
97%
99%
0%
48%
0%
97%
83%
95%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.075
0.030
0.030
0.199
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.030
0.221
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.025
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.025
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
0.41
0.03
0.04
0.09
2.58
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.08
3.50
0.14
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
1.61
0.06
0.03
27.29
0.04
0.04
0.17
0.09
0.03
0.95
2.21
0.04
0.37
0.03
1.08
0.27
0.99
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.59
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.31
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
0.40
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.16
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.70
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.46
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.15
0.06
0.03
1.98
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.29
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.14
0.05
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.50
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.35
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.61
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.19
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.61
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.00
5.54
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.19
0.45
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.22
0.04
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
2.80
NA
NA
NA
1.32
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.62
0.75
2.68
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.50
NA
NA
0.36
NA
NA
1.30
4.37
NA
0.64
0.64
NA
0.88
NA
0.63
1.03
0.59
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     40 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SFSD
SFSD
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
77
77
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
77
76
0
0
0
0
16
17
1
17
17
7
0
16
17
0
0
17
17
5
7
17
17
17
12
17
17
3
0
0
15
17
17
17
17
17
17
8
17
17
0
17
0%
1%
100%
100%
100%
100%
6%
0%
94%
0%
0%
59%
100%
6%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
71%
59%
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
82%
100%
100%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
53%
0%
0%
100%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.030
0.030
1.066
0.435
0.507
0.739
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.237
0.105
0.050
0.085
0.080
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.075
0.030
0.030
0.372
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.030
1.096
0.040
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
3.61
1.62
0.65
1.06
0.03
0.03
0.30
0.05
0.04
4.62
0.35
0.11
0.05
0.32
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.39
1.40
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.90
0.11
0.12
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
1.75
0.06
0.03
8.35
0.04
Median
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
2.01
0.91
0.56
0.82
0.03
0.03
0.15
0.05
0.04
2.15
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.15
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.21
0.68
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.66
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.15
0.06
0.03
2.63
0.04
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
2.14
0.90
0.57
0.83
0.03
0.03
0.15
0.05
0.04
2.11
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.16
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.20
0.54
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.63
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.42
0.06
0.03
3.08
0.04
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
2.04
0.85
0.57
0.82
0.03
0.03
0.13
0.05
0.04
0.86
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.15
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.17
0.31
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.61
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.22
0.06
0.03
2.71
0.04
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.30
0.04
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
1.91
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.00
0.00
1.83
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.00
3.04
3.00
14.62
10.52
0.00
NA
2.32
NA
NA
1.11
11.05
0.00
NA
2.41
8.93
NA
NA
1.88
1.20
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
4.32
6.25
4.10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.84
NA
NA
1.69
NA
                     41 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
17
2
12
17
0
0
17
1
17
0
0
0
16
17
0
16
17
17
0
0
0
0
64
72
7
71
70
72
0
64
72
6
0
72
72
68
2
71
72
72
66
72
0%
88%
29%
0%
100%
100%
0%
94%
0%
100%
100%
100%
6%
0%
100%
6%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
11%
0%
90%
1%
3%
0%
100%
11%
0%
92%
100%
0%
0%
6%
97%
1%
0%
0%
8%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.238
0.789
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.324
0.071
0.200
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.38
0.250
0.521
0.463
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.225
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
Highest
(ppbv)
0.04
0.47
0.03
0.03
2.90
10.65
0.04
0.26
0.03
3.46
0.23
0.66
0.03
0.04
0.45
0.03
0.03
0.03
10.37
3.30
0.80
0.85
0.08
0.03
0.58
0.05
0.24
0.13
1.57
1.92
0.05
3.00
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.09
3.53
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
Median
(ppbv)
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.03
0.47
1.55
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.67
0.14
0.42
0.03
0.04
0.13
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.31
0.99
0.61
0.64
0.03
0.03
0.13
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.30
0.11
0.05
0.15
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.30
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.73
2.52
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.92
0.14
0.41
0.03
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.20
1.15
0.62
0.64
0.03
0.03
0.14
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.36
0.19
0.05
0.21
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.41
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.55
1.84
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.73
0.13
0.39
0.03
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.47
1.01
0.62
0.63
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.33
0.13
0.05
0.14
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.09
1.26
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.70
2.62
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.81
0.05
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.36
0.61
0.05
0.08
0.01
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.21
0.28
0.00
0.36
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
1.04
0.00
NA
1.04
0.96
NA
1.40
NA
1.13
3.02
3.07
0.00
NA
1.16
0.00
NA
NA
1.35
1.87
12.53
8.22
4.29
NA
1.36
0.00
1.58
NA
1.72
0.66
NA
0.57
5.87
NA
NA
0.00
2.36
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                     42 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO

Samples
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37

Compound
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
Number of
Nondetects
72
5
0
1
72
72
72
72
69
72
72
64
72
72
0
72
72
12
27
72
0
0
72
13
72
0
0
0
72
72
56
72
72
72
1
0
0
0
27
37
11
35
Frequency
of Detects
0%
93%
100%
99%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
83%
63%
0%
100%
100%
0%
82%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
97%
100%
100%
100%
27%
0%
70%
5%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.030
0.261
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.36
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.045
0.140
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.06
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.07
0.322
0.540
0.466
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
Highest
(ppbv)
0.03
0.07
2.81
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.09
0.05
0.35
0.06
0.03
6.75
0.04
0.04
1.28
0.21
0.03
0.86
2.87
0.04
0.37
0.03
1.19
0.25
0.76
0.03
0.04
1.14
0.03
0.03
0.03
6.82
2.90
0.80
0.83
0.03
0.03
0.49
0.05
Median
(ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.97
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.97
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.03
0.25
0.88
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.37
0.09
0.24
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.48
0.71
0.63
0.58
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
1.01
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
2.27
0.04
0.04
0.13
0.05
0.03
0.28
0.93
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.39
0.09
0.27
0.03
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.88
0.86
0.63
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.05
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.03
0.91
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
1.94
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.24
0.80
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.34
0.08
0.23
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.55
0.75
0.63
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.05
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.01
0.47
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
1.29
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.03
0.00
0.15
0.50
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.21
0.05
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.30
0.54
0.05
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
5.15
2.16
2.72
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.44
NA
NA
1.61
NA
NA
1.76
NA
NA
0.77
1.40
NA
1.88
1.85
NA
1.02
NA
1.89
1.79
1.92
NA
NA
0.49
NA
NA
NA
1.45
1.58
12.63
6.93
0.00
NA
0.91
0.00
                     43 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
35
31
0
36
37
0
0
36
37
0
6
37
37
37
30
37
37
3
0
0
33
37
36
37
23
36
37
31
37
37
0
37
37
7
20
34
0
0
37
7
37
0
5%
16%
100%
3%
0%
100%
100%
3%
0%
100%
84%
0%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
92%
100%
100%
11%
0%
3%
0%
38%
3%
0%
16%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
81%
46%
8%
100%
100%
0%
81%
0%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.040
0.125
0.249
0.11
0.05
0.071
0.035
0.030
0.040
0.279
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.314
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.93
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.384
1.306
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.49
Highest
(ppbv)
0.24
8.44
0.59
0.11
0.05
5.01
0.12
0.11
0.04
4.00
3.49
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.13
2.13
0.12
0.16
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.19
0.09
0.05
0.70
0.06
0.03
6.10
0.04
0.04
0.21
0.39
0.23
2.23
7.32
0.04
1.15
0.03
2.03
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.13
0.29
0.11
0.05
0.35
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.75
0.83
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.44
0.09
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.79
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.82
2.65
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.87
0.05
0.45
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.87
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.95
1.01
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.53
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.12
0.06
0.03
3.02
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.05
0.04
0.90
3.01
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.93
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.17
0.31
0.11
0.05
0.41
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.79
0.68
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.48
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.05
0.09
0.05
0.09
0.06
0.03
2.76
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.83
2.80
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.89
Standard
Deviation
0.04
1.39
0.07
0.00
0.00
1.36
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.70
0.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.33
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
1.24
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.37
1.27
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.31
Coefficient of
Variation
1.31
0.32
4.68
0.00
NA
0.64
6.79
2.37
NA
1.35
1.33
NA
NA
NA
3.36
NA
NA
2.07
1.60
4.40
3.71
NA
0.00
NA
1.49
0.00
NA
0.94
NA
NA
2.43
NA
NA
1.77
0.83
0.97
2.42
2.37
NA
0.42
NA
2.98
                     44 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of
Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
2
0
37
37
10
36
37
37
0
0
0
0
20
21
1
21
19
17
0
21
21
1
0
21
21
2
0
21
21
21
6
21
21
3
0
0
9
21
21
21
13
21
95%
100%
0%
0%
73%
3%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
5%
0%
95%
0%
10%
19%
100%
0%
0%
95%
100%
0%
0%
90%
100%
0%
0%
0%
71%
0%
0%
86%
100%
100%
57%
0%
0%
0%
38%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.04
0.090
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.890
0.875
0.510
0.502
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.25
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.100
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.370
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.482
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
Highest
(ppbv)
0.31
0.91
0.03
0.04
0.67
0.03
0.03
0.03
12.25
6.27
1.36
0.86
0.03
0.03
0.68
0.05
0.19
7.64
14.50
0.11
0.05
0.54
0.81
0.03
0.04
11.74
38.49
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.10
0.08
0.03
0.06
2.44
0.11
0.98
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.09
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.19
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.90
2.16
0.73
0.73
0.03
0.03
0.20
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.32
0.11
0.05
0.23
0.19
0.03
0.04
1.34
10.39
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.09
0.10
0.16
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.08
0.24
0.03
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.03
4.17
2.49
0.77
0.71
0.03
0.03
0.25
0.05
0.05
0.76
1.02
0.11
0.05
0.23
0.22
0.03
0.04
2.31
11.52
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.22
0.09
0.23
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.06
0.21
0.03
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.45
2.20
0.76
0.71
0.03
0.03
0.20
0.05
0.05
0.21
0.40
0.11
0.05
0.19
0.19
0.03
0.04
1.05
8.42
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.10
0.08
0.15
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
Standard
Deviation
0.06
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.67
1.40
0.17
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.03
1.81
3.09
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.15
0.00
0.00
2.82
8.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.57
0.02
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
1.23
1.43
NA
NA
0.75
0.00
NA
NA
1.56
1.77
4.50
8.46
0.00
NA
1.56
NA
1.46
0.42
0.33
NA
NA
1.87
1.45
NA
NA
0.82
1.37
NA
NA
NA
2.01
NA
NA
3.39
2.15
4.11
0.98
NA
NA
NA
3.58
NA
                     45 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS

Samples
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13

Compound
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
Number of
Nondetects
21
5
21
21
0
21
21
1
5
21
0
0
21
1
21
0
0
0
19
21
1
21
21
20
0
0
0
0
13
13
3
13
13
6
0
13
13
3
0
13
13
0
Frequency
of Detects
0%
76%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
95%
76%
0%
100%
100%
0%
95%
0%
100%
100%
100%
10%
0%
95%
0%
0%
5%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
77%
0%
0%
54%
100%
0%
0%
77%
100%
0%
0%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.640
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.100
0.270
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.14
0.035
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.23
0.025
0.407
0.418
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.191
0.11
0.05
0.030
0.087
0.030
0.040
1.570
Highest
(ppbv)
0.05
1.47
0.06
0.03
9.44
0.04
0.04
0.40
0.15
0.03
1.10
3.12
0.04
0.31
0.03
1.32
0.35
1.15
0.03
0.04
0.52
0.03
0.03
0.03
3.91
1.55
0.69
0.86
0.03
0.03
0.21
0.05
0.04
10.14
0.52
0.11
0.05
0.96
0.15
0.03
0.04
4.62
Median
(ppbv)
0.05
0.49
0.06
0.03
4.26
0.04
0.04
0.18
0.06
0.03
0.60
1.63
0.04
0.16
0.03
0.71
0.19
0.59
0.03
0.04
0.15
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.19
0.55
0.61
0.62
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.64
0.33
0.11
0.05
0.12
0.13
0.03
0.04
2.59
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.48
0.06
0.03
4.20
0.04
0.04
0.18
0.06
0.03
0.60
1.62
0.04
0.17
0.03
0.70
0.18
0.57
0.03
0.04
0.17
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.44
0.60
0.59
0.64
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.05
0.04
2.78
0.34
0.11
0.05
0.26
0.12
0.03
0.04
2.61
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.05
0.35
0.06
0.03
3.56
0.04
0.04
0.15
0.05
0.03
0.51
1.38
0.04
0.15
0.03
0.60
0.16
0.47
0.03
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.14
0.43
0.59
0.63
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.80
0.33
0.11
0.05
0.14
0.12
0.03
0.04
2.50
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.30
0.83
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.35
0.09
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.99
0.41
0.09
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
3.41
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.83
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
1.45
NA
NA
1.91
NA
NA
1.83
1.70
NA
1.99
1.95
NA
2.38
NA
1.99
2.06
1.93
0.00
NA
1.52
NA
NA
0.00
1.45
1.43
6.75
5.96
NA
NA
1.04
NA
NA
0.82
4.14
NA
NA
0.80
6.43
NA
NA
3.14
                     46 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C

Site
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
YFMI
YFMI

Samples
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
38
38

Compound
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
Number of
Nondetects
1
13
13
13
13
13
13
3
0
0
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
12
13
13
0
13
13
1
12
13
0
0
13
5
13
0
1
0
7
13
10
13
13
13
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
92%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
77%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
92%
8%
0%
100%
100%
0%
62%
0%
100%
92%
100%
46%
0%
23%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.025
0.08
0.03
0.030
0.119
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.03
0.76
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.164
0.574
0.040
0.035
0.030
0.12
0.04
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.747
0.335
Highest
(ppbv)
2.07
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.87
0.12
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
24.68
0.04
0.04
0.29
0.03
0.03
5.41
17.67
0.04
0.09
0.03
5.98
0.18
0.56
0.09
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
5.53
4.01
Median
(ppbv)
0.58
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.39
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.86
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.32
1.02
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.40
0.04
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.87
0.73
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.72
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.43
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
3.93
0.04
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.78
2.57
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.86
0.06
0.18
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
2.04
1.12
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.55
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.37
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.22
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.39
1.28
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.42
0.05
0.14
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
1.83
0.90
Standard
Deviation
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.48
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
1.45
4.73
0.00
0.02
0.00
1.59
0.04
0.15
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.86
Coefficient of
Variation
1.39
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
1.89
1.99
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.61
NA
NA
1.30
0.00
NA
0.54
0.54
NA
2.58
NA
0.54
1.26
1.22
1.66
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
1.95
1.30
                     47 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1 ,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1 - DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2 -DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1 ,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1 ,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
0
0
32
38
4
38
38
37
0
38
38
1
0
38
38
34
4
38
38
38
29
38
38
4
0
0
38
38
38
38
32
38
38
37
38
38
0
38
38
10
21
38
100%
100%
16%
0%
89%
0%
0%
3%
100%
0%
0%
97%
100%
0%
0%
11%
89%
0%
0%
0%
24%
0%
0%
89%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
16%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
74%
45%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.535
0.486
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.125
0.27
0.11
0.050
0.030
0.071
0.030
0.040
0.090
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.03
0.08
0.030
0.030
0.317
0.040
0.060
0.035
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.090
0.050
0.075
0.06
0.03
0.390
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
1.34
0.94
0.03
0.03
0.32
0.05
0.04
0.49
3.21
0.11
0.05
16.87
1.00
0.03
0.04
0.24
2.48
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.03
0.11
45.90
0.14
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.28
0.09
0.05
0.21
0.06
0.03
14.99
0.04
0.04
0.32
0.34
0.03
Median
(ppbv)
0.65
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.34
0.11
0.05
0.19
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.69
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
1.38
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
1.87
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
Arithmetic
Mean (ppbv)
0.69
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.45
0.11
0.05
0.75
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.78
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
6.79
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
3.11
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.05
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.67
0.60
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.38
0.11
0.05
0.25
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.60
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.03
2.26
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.03
2.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.03
Standard Coefficient of
Deviation Variation
0.15
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.47
0.00
0.00
2.70
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
10.70
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
3.17
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
4.63
6.89
0.00
NA
1.20
NA
NA
2.28
0.95
NA
NA
0.28
0.92
NA
NA
3.83
1.59
NA
NA
NA
4.81
NA
NA
2.54
0.63
5.92
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.93
NA
NA
3.60
NA
NA
0.98
NA
NA
1.06
0.83
NA
                     48 of 49

-------
2001 Summary Tables for VOC Monitoring - Appendix C
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1 ,1 ,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o - XYLENE
1 ,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m-DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p-DICHLOROBENZENE
o-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1 ,3-BUTADIENE
0
0
38
13
38
0
0
0
38
38
27
38
38
38
100%
100%
0%
66%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.070
0.190
0.040
0.035
0.03
0.08
0.035
0.080
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
Highest
(ppbv)
2.62
4.59
0.04
0.23
0.03
1.32
0.40
1.02
0.03
0.04
0.42
0.03
0.03
0.03
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.26
0.72
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.31
0.09
0.26
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.45
1.07
0.04
0.07
0.03
0.39
0.12
0.31
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.31
0.79
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.31
0.09
0.26
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.49
0.92
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
0.92
1.15
NA
1.24
NA
1.33
1.21
1.56
NA
NA
0.90
NA
NA
NA
                     49 of 49

-------
               Appendix D




2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Site
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
Samples
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Compound
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1 ,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
22
0
0
0
0
11
0
22
0
21
13
0
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
14%
1 00%
95%
95%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
36%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
50%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
5%
41%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
1.96
1.64
1.46
0.89
7.20
0.24
1.21
0.96
0.19
2.46
0.31
0.36
0.21
4.85
0.11
0.11
1.77
1.44
0.67
0.34
0.15
0.52
0.21
0.21
0.36
0.55
0.71
0.75
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.83
0.16
0.16
0.65
0.21
1.46
0.27
Highest
(ppbv)
7.60
6.49
3.65
3.34
36.60
0.24
22.46
3.57
0.76
10.14
0.96
0.95
0.21
77.08
0.58
0.98
38.03
18.77
6.84
0.77
1.42
2.15
0.43
0.21
1.35
1.85
5.93
3.40
0.33
0.77
0.24
6.20
0.16
0.67
2.27
1.74
4.53
69.77
Median
(ppbv)
2.98
2.34
2.43
1.37
13.24
0.24
2.11
1.43
0.19
4.06
0.45
0.46
0.21
7.43
0.35
0.49
2.71
2.99
1.36
0.44
0.54
1.06
0.21
0.21
0.49
0.85
2.75
1.32
0.16
0.52
0.24
1.58
0.16
0.16
0.92
0.55
2.75
0.84
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
3.48
2.91
2.40
1.58
16.17
0.24
3.38
1.67
0.30
4.89
0.53
0.53
0.21
12.05
0.35
0.49
4.72
4.35
2.20
0.49
0.61
1.12
0.22
0.21
0.54
0.98
3.10
1.65
0.17
0.46
0.24
1.96
0.16
0.19
1.11
0.62
2.66
6.48
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
3.29
2.69
2.34
1.50
14.56
0.24
2.55
1.59
0.26
4.49
0.50
0.52
0.21
9.02
0.34
0.43
3.24
3.58
1.71
0.48
0.50
1.06
0.22
0.21
0.51
0.92
2.77
1.52
0.17
0.42
0.24
1.71
0.16
0.17
1.03
0.53
2.53
1.57
Standard
Deviation
1.31
1.27
0.58
0.58
8.04
0.00
4.36
0.62
0.17
2.15
0.19
0.15
0.00
15.24
0.09
0.23
7.57
3.63
1.75
0.12
0.35
0.39
0.05
0.00
0.22
0.35
1.39
0.72
0.04
0.19
0.00
1.20
0.00
0.11
0.45
0.35
0.83
14.87
Coefficient
of Variation
2.65
2.29
4.15
2.75
2.01
NA
0.78
2.69
1.74
2.28
2.80
3.65
0.00
0.79
3.74
2.11
0.62
1.20
1.26
4.07
1.73
2.84
4.63
NA
2.47
2.78
2.23
2.31
4.76
2.45
NA
1.64
0.00
1.64
2.44
1.74
3.20
0.44
                      1 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
7
0
0
1
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
22
18
0
22
0
0
22
19
19
0
4
0
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
64%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
68%
1 00%
1 00%
95%
1 00%
36%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
27%
1 00%
1 00%
45%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
0%
18%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
0%
14%
14%
1 00%
82%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.67
0.26
0.60
0.20
0.51
0.57
0.39
0.18
0.19
10.20
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
2.75
8.61
0.98
2.59
0.21
0.48
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.71
0.19
0.30
0.21
0.20
1.31
0.20
2.10
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.87
0.23
0.22
Highest
(ppbv)
2.33
3.01
3.24
2.07
5.35
2.72
3.41
0.83
2.12
47.00
1.28
1.22
0.26
2.46
9.15
34.67
9.68
9.26
0.21
2.05
2.91
2.09
1.18
2.78
1.73
2.44
0.21
2.30
3.37
0.20
8.26
1.10
0.21
0.40
0.22
29.54
1.18
26.84
Median
(ppbv)
1.08
0.78
1.04
0.20
1.23
1.04
0.61
0.18
0.52
17.00
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
4.45
16.70
1.41
5.00
0.21
0.64
0.93
0.20
0.53
1.04
0.70
0.91
0.21
0.20
2.09
0.20
3.95
0.46
0.21
0.12
0.22
2.80
0.23
2.37
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.33
0.97
1.33
0.33
1.56
1.22
0.78
0.26
0.65
19.43
0.34
0.37
0.26
0.52
4.87
18.39
2.10
5.31
0.21
0.80
1.20
0.42
0.47
1.24
0.76
0.90
0.21
0.44
2.18
0.20
4.33
0.51
0.21
0.15
0.22
4.67
0.34
3.80
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1.24
0.81
1.20
0.25
1.25
1.11
0.68
0.22
0.57
17.56
0.30
0.32
0.26
0.41
4.58
17.45
1.69
4.97
0.21
0.73
1.04
0.30
0.40
1.16
0.70
0.79
0.21
0.28
2.10
0.20
3.98
0.47
0.21
0.14
0.22
2.84
0.30
2.11
Standard
Deviation
0.52
0.64
0.66
0.43
1.27
0.58
0.61
0.19
0.41
9.44
0.24
0.24
0.00
0.48
1.77
6.19
2.01
1.95
0.00
0.44
0.70
0.47
0.25
0.50
0.31
0.50
0.00
0.58
0.62
0.00
1.83
0.21
0.00
0.08
0.00
6.17
0.24
5.60
Coefficient
of Variation
2.56
1.51
2.02
0.78
1.23
2.11
1.27
1.37
1.59
2.06
1.42
1.53
0.00
1.08
2.75
2.97
1.04
2.72
0.00
1.82
1.72
0.90
1.86
2.46
2.44
1.81
NA
0.77
3.52
NA
2.37
2.46
NA
1.96
0.00
0.76
1.43
0.68
                      2 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Site
BAPR
BAPR
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
Samples
22
22
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Compound
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Number of
Nondetects
21
4
0
0
0
0
0
79
0
1
71
0
0
0
78
0
0
59
0
2
0
0
60
1
46
79
0
0
0
0
76
1
79
0
78
58
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
5%
82%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
99%
10%
100%
100%
100%
1%
100%
100%
25%
100%
97%
100%
100%
24%
99%
42%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
4%
99%
0%
100%
1%
27%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.23
0.23
0.57
0.28
2.46
0.47
2.34
0.24
0.19
0.16
0.19
0.86
0.15
0.18
0.21
0.74
0.11
0.11
0.48
0.10
0.11
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.08
0.20
0.35
0.16
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.15
0.16
0.16
0.12
0.21
Highest
(ppbv)
0.23
3.66
9.34
9.94
15.53
4.10
17.94
0.24
109.63
3.56
0.90
69.51
1.40
1.43
0.21
169.84
0.67
1.06
85.48
1.26
1.28
0.81
1.76
1.41
0.76
0.21
2.20
1.80
6.23
8.67
0.45
0.75
0.24
37.86
0.16
2.92
9.57
0.96
Median
(ppbv)
0.23
0.23
1.09
0.77
5.89
0.77
6.01
0.24
1.41
0.76
0.19
2.95
0.15
0.18
0.21
1.73
0.32
0.11
1.51
0.26
0.22
0.15
0.15
0.42
0.21
0.21
0.30
0.45
0.91
0.57
0.16
0.51
0.24
0.78
0.16
0.16
0.45
0.21
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.23
0.54
1.30
1.09
6.92
0.83
6.81
0.24
3.44
0.85
0.20
4.29
0.19
0.26
0.21
5.53
0.33
0.13
3.96
0.29
0.21
0.22
0.18
0.37
0.23
0.21
0.36
0.45
1.07
0.78
0.16
0.45
0.24
1.62
0.16
0.26
0.67
0.30
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.23
0.36
1.17
0.84
6.26
0.78
5.85
0.24
1.46
0.80
0.19
2.87
0.17
0.23
0.21
2.27
0.31
0.12
1.78
0.25
0.18
0.20
0.16
0.33
0.22
0.21
0.31
0.40
0.93
0.59
0.16
0.41
0.24
0.83
0.16
0.20
0.48
0.27
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.75
1.01
1.20
3.08
0.42
3.86
0.00
12.55
0.40
0.08
7.85
0.15
0.17
0.00
19.27
0.09
0.11
10.60
0.19
0.15
0.12
0.19
0.19
0.09
0.00
0.26
0.23
0.81
1.07
0.03
0.18
0.00
4.30
0.00
0.36
1.13
0.15
Coefficient
of Variation
0.00
0.72
1.29
0.91
2.25
1.98
1.76
NA
0.27
2.14
2.49
0.55
1.22
1.54
0.00
0.29
3.55
1.16
0.37
1.56
1.40
1.88
0.97
1.94
2.59
NA
1.39
1.99
1.32
0.72
5.03
2.54
NA
0.38
0.00
0.72
0.60
2.04
                      3 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
0
0
0
0
7
25
0
0
1
78
3
0
15
3
27
0
11
10
12
3
64
7
11
44
13
9
11
28
24
42
0
79
0
45
23
62
78
0
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
91%
68%
1 00%
1 00%
99%
1%
96%
1 00%
81%
96%
66%
1 00%
86%
87%
85%
96%
19%
91%
86%
44%
84%
89%
86%
65%
70%
47%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
43%
71%
22%
1%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.53
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.18
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.37
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.17
0.14
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
Highest
(ppbv)
6.17
4.84
2.14
1.35
2.18
0.20
3.15
2.07
1.35
0.45
1.01
80.91
0.59
1.16
0.70
1.02
5.48
22.64
4.92
9.10
0.75
0.78
0.26
5.11
0.58
2.11
1.11
1.33
1.09
1.88
2.98
0.20
16.05
0.63
0.66
0.25
0.22
54.98
Median
(ppbv)
1.11
0.27
0.37
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.39
0.25
0.37
0.18
0.19
0.88
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.45
0.64
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.53
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.32
0.54
0.42
0.44
0.40
0.20
0.43
0.39
0.36
0.18
0.20
2.41
0.25
0.30
0.29
0.28
0.30
0.79
0.73
0.34
0.22
0.22
0.26
0.30
0.19
0.21
0.21
0.17
0.22
0.41
0.32
0.20
0.82
0.15
0.22
0.12
0.22
2.33
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1.14
0.40
0.33
0.37
0.31
0.20
0.35
0.33
0.31
0.18
0.19
0.92
0.25
0.28
0.28
0.27
0.21
0.43
0.53
0.21
0.21
0.22
0.26
0.23
0.19
0.17
0.20
0.15
0.21
0.30
0.29
0.20
0.33
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.61
Standard
Deviation
0.91
0.71
0.34
0.27
0.34
0.00
0.38
0.29
0.22
0.03
0.10
9.13
0.04
0.16
0.11
0.09
0.61
2.52
0.66
1.01
0.06
0.07
0.00
0.57
0.04
0.24
0.11
0.16
0.10
0.41
0.32
0.00
2.11
0.06
0.05
0.01
0.00
7.30
Coefficient
of Variation
1.45
0.75
1.24
1.60
1.17
0.00
1.13
1.33
1.61
5.97
2.05
0.26
6.52
1.84
2.75
2.92
0.49
0.31
1.11
0.33
3.59
3.22
0.00
0.53
4.21
0.85
1.96
1.12
2.17
0.99
1.02
NA
0.39
2.52
4.36
8.45
0.00
0.32
                      4 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Site
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
Samples
79
79
79
79
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
132
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
Compound
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Number of
Nondetects
71
6
79
57
0
0
0
0
0
134
0
0
75
0
0
0
126
0
0
27
0
2
1
0
42
2
80
134
0
0
0
0
122
0
134
0
134
134
Frequency
of Detects
10%
92%
0%
28%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
44%
100%
100%
100%
6%
100%
100%
80%
100%
99%
99%
100%
69%
99%
40%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
9%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.92
0.46
3.07
0.55
1.93
0.24
0.42
0.58
0.19
0.97
0.15
0.18
0.21
0.80
0.11
0.11
0.55
0.10
0.11
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.08
0.20
0.48
0.16
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.44
0.16
0.16
Highest
(ppbv)
0.23
42.07
0.23
3.85
7.57
5.26
21.29
6.70
17.68
0.24
5.74
5.94
0.54
20.39
0.68
0.76
0.21
22.08
1.03
1.44
6.25
10.20
0.96
0.64
1.01
2.51
0.56
0.21
0.77
3.67
18.09
9.30
0.16
0.95
0.24
40.13
0.16
0.16
Median
(ppbv)
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
3.05
1.53
6.45
1.55
5.44
0.24
1.47
1.45
0.19
3.34
0.15
0.18
0.21
3.29
0.38
0.11
1.90
0.29
0.31
0.15
0.15
0.69
0.21
0.21
0.36
0.81
2.76
1.10
0.16
0.55
0.24
0.99
0.16
0.16
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.23
1.54
0.23
0.30
3.36
1.74
6.78
2.34
6.07
0.24
1.64
1.78
0.20
4.44
0.20
0.28
0.21
4.40
0.39
0.23
2.09
0.99
0.34
0.25
0.22
0.80
0.22
0.21
0.39
0.97
3.71
1.39
0.16
0.51
0.24
1.36
0.16
0.16
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.23
0.49
0.23
0.25
3.04
1.58
6.39
1.85
5.48
0.24
1.44
1.56
0.20
3.56
0.18
0.25
0.21
3.49
0.35
0.17
1.88
0.46
0.30
0.22
0.19
0.68
0.21
0.21
0.37
0.83
2.62
1.09
0.16
0.47
0.24
1.02
0.16
0.16
Standard
Deviation
0.00
5.10
0.00
0.43
1.44
0.77
2.54
1.62
2.88
0.00
0.90
0.97
0.05
3.62
0.12
0.14
0.00
3.66
0.16
0.25
1.06
1.58
0.17
0.13
0.18
0.47
0.04
0.00
0.12
0.59
3.24
1.20
0.00
0.18
0.00
3.40
0.00
0.00
Coefficient
of Variation
0.00
0.30
NA
0.71
2.34
2.26
2.67
1.44
2.11
NA
1.82
1.84
3.83
1.22
1.75
1.99
0.00
1.20
2.38
0.91
1.98
0.63
1.97
1.94
1.25
1.70
5.23
0.00
3.27
1.64
1.14
1.16
0.00
2.83
NA
0.40
NA
NA
                      5 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Site
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
Number of
Samples Compound Nondetects
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
37
0
0
0
92
0
0
12
1
74
0
5
0
10
1
130
1
13
113
20
0
1
38
19
53
0
134
0
5
15
10
Frequency
of Detects
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
72%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
31%
1 00%
1 00%
91%
99%
45%
1 00%
96%
1 00%
93%
99%
3%
99%
90%
16%
85%
1 00%
99%
72%
86%
60%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
96%
89%
93%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.12
0.21
0.71
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.18
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.37
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.44
0.14
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
Highest
(ppbv)
10.18
0.91
4.39
1.54
1.98
1.38
3.08
0.55
2.98
4.07
1.77
0.55
0.81
12.33
1.33
1.26
0.26
1.80
2.93
4.24
15.67
2.27
0.45
1.47
0.66
1.10
0.52
1.14
0.62
0.66
5.14
2.99
1.83
0.20
1.84
6.01
2.31
2.09
Median
(ppbv)
0.58
0.42
1.62
0.27
0.71
0.51
0.45
0.20
0.79
0.25
0.42
0.18
0.19
2.15
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.48
1.33
0.70
0.77
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.48
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.57
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.40
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.72
0.38
1.70
0.37
0.79
0.51
0.55
0.21
0.94
0.48
0.42
0.18
0.31
2.58
0.26
0.27
0.26
0.36
0.71
1.53
1.17
0.80
0.21
0.32
0.26
0.22
0.20
0.51
0.25
0.19
0.26
0.57
0.57
0.20
0.38
0.27
0.37
0.47
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.62
0.34
1.60
0.33
0.67
0.44
0.43
0.20
0.82
0.40
0.36
0.18
0.28
2.10
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.32
0.53
1.35
0.67
0.68
0.21
0.27
0.26
0.21
0.19
0.45
0.23
0.17
0.22
0.39
0.49
0.20
0.30
0.17
0.30
0.39
Standard
Deviation
0.86
0.19
0.62
0.24
0.42
0.30
0.43
0.06
0.52
0.42
0.24
0.03
0.16
1.82
0.10
0.09
0.00
0.26
0.58
0.82
2.24
0.44
0.02
0.24
0.03
0.12
0.07
0.23
0.12
0.12
0.43
0.54
0.34
0.00
0.32
0.74
0.33
0.32
Coefficient
of Variation
0.84
2.05
2.73
1.54
1.88
1.71
1.27
3.62
1.81
1.16
1.73
5.72
1.93
1.41
2.56
2.93
0.00
1.40
1.23
1.87
0.52
1.84
10.09
1.36
7.51
1.90
2.99
2.25
2.03
1.61
0.61
1.05
1.70
NA
1.19
0.37
1.11
1.49
                      6 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13

Samples
134
134
134
134
134
134
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74

Compound
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
Number of
Nondetects
66
0
94
6
131
106
0
0
0
0
0
74
0
0
1
0
8
1
42
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
47
73
0
0
0
0
34
0
74
0
Frequency
of Detects
51%
100%
30%
96%
2%
21%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
99%
100%
89%
99%
43%
100%
100%
99%
100%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
36%
1%
100%
100%
100%
100%
54%
100%
0%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.83
1.17
2.06
0.92
0.24
0.24
0.80
1.27
0.19
1.25
0.15
0.18
0.21
2.37
0.11
0.11
1.47
0.10
0.29
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.34
0.53
1.81
0.93
0.16
0.23
0.24
1.22
Highest
(ppbv)
0.51
6.52
1.25
4.25
0.23
0.62
16.34
16.24
93.31
25.99
74.17
0.24
19.21
8.40
1.61
38.21
2.33
1.75
1.29
57.21
2.74
2.88
30.31
4.34
4.16
2.10
4.80
2.14
2.21
0.21
3.49
23.21
13.98
8.72
0.59
0.89
0.24
8.95
Median
(ppbv)
0.22
0.98
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
5.09
4.22
12.52
2.19
11.35
0.24
2.93
2.57
0.39
5.05
0.15
0.36
0.21
9.15
0.55
0.63
5.16
0.91
0.70
0.45
0.77
0.75
0.21
0.21
0.67
3.65
4.43
2.48
0.16
0.47
0.24
3.22
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.22
1.17
0.25
0.53
0.23
0.23
5.95
4.92
14.43
2.95
12.41
0.24
3.30
3.00
0.46
6.15
0.36
0.42
0.28
13.45
0.76
0.81
7.37
0.99
1.02
0.58
1.08
0.91
0.26
0.21
0.85
5.13
5.37
3.09
0.20
0.43
0.24
3.62
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.22
0.92
0.24
0.35
0.23
0.23
5.26
4.18
11.60
2.40
9.74
0.24
2.70
2.71
0.36
4.88
0.26
0.33
0.24
10.37
0.62
0.66
5.59
0.85
0.83
0.47
0.84
0.81
0.23
0.21
0.73
3.15
4.80
2.66
0.18
0.38
0.24
3.15
Standard
Deviation
0.03
1.01
0.13
0.74
0.00
0.05
3.16
3.13
12.06
3.07
9.58
0.00
2.56
1.51
0.34
5.18
0.37
0.34
0.21
10.98
0.53
0.59
6.17
0.59
0.78
0.40
0.88
0.46
0.25
0.00
0.58
4.88
2.71
1.79
0.10
0.21
0.00
1.95
Coefficient
of Variation
8.41
1.15
1.94
0.71
0.00
4.50
1.89
1.57
1.20
0.96
1.29
NA
1.29
1.99
1.35
1.19
0.98
1.25
0.00
1.23
1.43
1.39
1.19
1.67
1.32
1.45
1.23
1.99
1.03
0.00
1.46
1.05
1.98
1.73
0.00
2.05
NA
1.86
                      7 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of
Site Samples Compound Nondetects
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
73
51
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
58
0
1
0
0
0
45
0
12
20
1
0
0
1
2
38
0
74
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
1%
31%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
32%
100%
100%
100%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
22%
100%
99%
100%
100%
100%
39%
100%
84%
73%
99%
100%
100%
99%
97%
49%
100%
0%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.16
0.16
0.76
0.21
1.85
0.27
0.59
0.26
0.56
0.20
1.27
0.51
0.18
0.18
0.37
2.62
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.99
0.35
0.36
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.37
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
Highest
(ppbv)
0.16
0.46
5.50
2.74
55.36
4.06
5.04
2.83
6.64
0.88
12.26
4.49
5.68
2.24
4.83
33.06
1.69
1.40
0.60
1.93
5.33
16.69
4.69
5.17
0.21
2.12
1.06
5.80
1.65
5.66
2.78
2.86
3.02
4.16
5.84
0.20
4.26
1.36
Median
(ppbv)
0.16
0.16
1.74
0.79
7.33
0.92
1.27
0.82
1.78
0.20
3.32
1.26
1.13
0.46
1.08
7.31
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.59
0.98
2.95
0.80
1.07
0.21
0.49
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.92
0.54
0.57
0.46
0.20
1.40
0.20
0.80
0.32
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.16
0.17
2.10
0.99
8.08
1.03
1.60
1.01
2.11
0.23
4.28
1.54
1.28
0.56
1.49
8.89
0.42
0.41
0.26
0.66
1.26
3.70
0.91
1.38
0.21
0.55
0.30
0.69
0.32
1.22
0.65
0.72
0.59
0.50
1.81
0.20
1.01
0.37
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.16
0.16
1.85
0.85
7.03
0.90
1.38
0.86
1.82
0.21
3.60
1.33
1.13
0.41
1.24
7.55
0.36
0.35
0.26
0.55
1.07
3.18
0.84
1.20
0.21
0.44
0.28
0.38
0.26
1.01
0.53
0.59
0.44
0.36
1.54
0.20
0.86
0.29
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.05
1.11
0.57
6.21
0.59
0.93
0.57
1.21
0.12
2.68
0.87
0.74
0.46
0.99
5.76
0.29
0.26
0.04
0.40
0.80
2.40
0.54
0.84
0.00
0.39
0.14
0.99
0.25
0.89
0.45
0.50
0.53
0.55
1.13
0.00
0.69
0.26
Coefficient
of Variation
NA
NA
1.90
1.73
1.30
1.73
1.72
1.76
1.74
1.94
1.60
1.77
1.72
1.21
1.51
1.54
1.46
1.55
0.00
1.66
1.58
1.54
1.70
1.64
NA
1.41
2.09
0.70
1.27
1.37
1.44
1.44
1.11
0.92
1.60
NA
1.47
1.39
                      8 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CAM 13
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA

Samples
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33

Compound
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
Number of
Nondetects
10
19
71
0
17
0
72
57
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
13
0
1
0
28
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
33
0
0
0
0
32
0
Frequency
of Detects
86%
74%
4%
100%
77%
100%
3%
23%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
61%
100%
97%
100%
15%
100%
88%
94%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
73%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
3%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.52
0.87
3.41
0.90
2.46
0.24
0.78
0.95
0.19
1.32
0.15
0.18
0.21
1.45
0.11
0.11
1.16
0.10
0.23
0.15
0.15
0.46
0.21
0.21
0.24
0.53
0.60
0.65
0.16
0.23
Highest
(ppbv)
1.06
0.54
0.22
7.38
1.01
2.79
0.23
0.51
21.32
3.87
10.23
5.79
12.34
0.24
9.64
1.97
0.19
10.83
0.55
0.72
0.21
18.07
3.23
0.89
15.90
3.08
0.98
0.67
1.03
0.92
1.83
0.21
0.70
1.35
4.90
2.35
0.16
0.87
Median
(ppbv)
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.48
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
2.13
1.44
4.97
1.12
4.47
0.24
1.25
1.24
0.19
3.38
0.15
0.39
0.21
5.86
0.43
0.33
3.08
0.67
0.42
0.33
0.37
0.64
0.21
0.21
0.43
0.76
2.03
1.51
0.16
0.60
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.26
0.16
0.22
0.63
0.25
0.40
0.23
0.23
3.57
1.76
5.56
1.62
5.38
0.24
2.07
1.31
0.19
3.84
0.21
0.34
0.21
6.99
0.58
0.35
3.61
1.05
0.45
0.32
0.38
0.65
0.32
0.21
0.44
0.80
2.37
1.40
0.16
0.61
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.24
0.15
0.22
0.44
0.24
0.31
0.23
0.23
2.72
1.60
5.29
1.39
4.84
0.24
1.55
1.29
0.19
3.34
0.19
0.31
0.21
6.24
0.43
0.28
3.20
0.70
0.41
0.28
0.31
0.64
0.25
0.21
0.43
0.77
2.17
1.34
0.16
0.58
Standard
Deviation
0.18
0.08
0.00
0.91
0.11
0.40
0.00
0.05
4.07
0.84
1.86
1.17
2.63
0.00
2.14
0.27
0.00
2.18
0.11
0.16
0.00
3.42
0.63
0.22
2.48
0.92
0.19
0.15
0.23
0.13
0.33
0.00
0.11
0.19
1.02
0.38
0.00
0.16
Coefficient
of Variation
1.49
1.88
NA
0.69
2.28
1.00
0.00
5.01
0.88
2.09
2.99
1.38
2.05
NA
0.96
4.89
0.00
1.76
1.85
2.12
0.00
2.05
0.92
1.60
1.46
1.13
2.40
2.12
1.63
4.89
0.95
NA
3.83
4.20
2.33
3.65
0.00
3.85
                      9 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
33
33
33
33
33
33
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
33
0
32
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
1
0
10
0
2
16
0
0
0
0
1
11
0
33
0%
1 00%
3%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
91%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
61%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
70%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
1 00%
70%
1 00%
94%
52%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
67%
1 00%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.24
0.70
0.16
0.16
0.38
0.21
0.96
0.27
0.42
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.50
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
1.16
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.17
0.14
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
Highest
(ppbv)
0.24
4.00
0.16
0.16
1.64
1.03
3.67
4.21
1.07
1.25
1.47
1.53
2.54
1.03
0.78
0.49
2.58
23.22
0.25
0.26
0.26
1.23
1.15
3.28
3.96
1.21
0.96
0.85
0.26
7.56
0.18
1.56
0.59
0.62
0.74
6.21
1.48
0.20
Median
(ppbv)
0.24
1.51
0.16
0.16
1.04
0.60
1.62
0.65
0.81
0.71
0.73
0.20
1.34
0.56
0.50
0.18
0.51
4.67
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.58
1.54
1.21
0.64
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.49
0.19
0.33
0.21
0.58
0.98
0.20
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.24
1.64
0.16
0.16
1.08
0.58
1.71
0.75
0.75
0.70
0.72
0.26
1.32
0.52
0.51
0.19
0.75
6.96
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.48
0.61
1.53
1.66
0.70
0.29
0.38
0.26
1.34
0.18
0.57
0.27
0.33
0.32
1.35
0.95
0.20
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.24
1.53
0.16
0.16
1.02
0.56
1.63
0.57
0.73
0.66
0.64
0.22
1.24
0.47
0.49
0.19
0.53
5.33
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.40
0.56
1.39
1.23
0.64
0.25
0.32
0.26
0.47
0.18
0.52
0.24
0.30
0.29
0.61
0.89
0.20
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.67
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.16
0.60
0.73
0.18
0.20
0.31
0.25
0.46
0.22
0.13
0.05
0.72
5.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.23
0.57
1.20
0.28
0.22
0.23
0.00
2.07
0.00
0.26
0.14
0.13
0.16
1.96
0.31
0.00
Coefficient
of Variation
NA
2.43
0.00
NA
2.97
3.64
2.86
1.03
4.12
3.49
2.32
1.05
2.86
2.37
3.95
3.52
1.05
1.32
NA
NA
0.00
1.60
2.61
2.67
1.39
2.50
1.31
1.66
0.00
0.65
0.00
2.21
1.92
2.58
2.02
0.69
3.06
NA
                      10 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA

Samples
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
67
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72

Compound
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
1
11
23
0
18
0
33
13
0
0
0
0
0
72
0
0
37
0
0
0
59
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
18
0
50
70
0
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
97%
67%
30%
100%
45%
100%
0%
61%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
49%
100%
100%
100%
18%
100%
100%
68%
100%
100%
100%
100%
75%
100%
31%
3%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.27
0.87
3.35
0.53
3.35
0.24
0.47
0.66
0.19
1.55
0.15
0.18
0.21
1.53
0.11
0.11
0.88
0.10
0.11
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.24
0.20
0.65
0.52
Highest
(ppbv)
6.17
0.75
0.90
1.49
0.22
13.57
0.23
6.00
0.23
2.07
15.06
14.18
20.19
7.60
20.09
0.24
11.37
6.60
1.07
35.86
1.33
1.50
26.24
77.56
4.30
2.82
50.42
3.19
3.09
1.79
4.33
5.09
1.07
0.21
3.97
16.63
21.26
12.87
Median
(ppbv)
0.51
0.29
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.64
0.23
0.63
0.23
0.23
2.70
1.99
7.01
1.15
6.78
0.24
1.75
1.11
0.19
5.82
0.15
0.18
0.21
9.21
0.31
0.11
5.14
0.29
0.31
0.15
0.15
0.71
0.21
0.21
0.49
0.73
2.69
1.33
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.25
0.31
0.27
0.23
0.22
2.34
0.23
1.35
0.23
0.69
3.93
2.90
7.12
1.65
7.45
0.24
2.06
1.43
0.27
7.59
0.28
0.36
0.60
16.42
0.48
0.38
9.07
0.69
0.55
0.35
0.49
1.00
0.26
0.21
0.79
1.71
3.96
2.09
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.59
0.26
0.24
0.17
0.22
0.85
0.23
0.68
0.23
0.44
3.11
2.17
6.61
1.32
6.81
0.24
1.66
1.20
0.23
5.52
0.21
0.27
0.24
9.54
0.36
0.21
5.72
0.40
0.38
0.25
0.24
0.76
0.23
0.21
0.60
0.91
2.70
1.45
Standard
Deviation
1.78
0.20
0.15
0.27
0.00
4.03
0.00
1.73
0.00
0.70
3.18
2.96
3.02
1.55
3.36
0.00
1.68
1.28
0.21
7.16
0.30
0.33
3.07
19.28
0.59
0.62
9.25
0.85
0.66
0.38
0.96
1.08
0.17
0.00
0.84
3.63
4.59
2.70
Coefficient
of Variation
0.70
1.55
1.83
0.87
0.00
0.58
0.00
0.78
NA
0.99
1.23
0.98
2.36
1.07
2.21
NA
1.22
1.11
1.27
1.06
0.94
1.08
0.20
0.85
0.82
0.62
0.98
0.81
0.83
0.91
0.51
0.93
1.54
0.00
0.94
0.47
0.86
0.77
                      11 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
61
0
71
0
69
66
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
33
0
0
0
53
1
0
1
0
52
0
1
0
7
0
55
1
10
52
3
0
0
6
9
29
15%
1 00%
1%
1 00%
4%
8%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
96%
54%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
26%
99%
1 00%
99%
1 00%
28%
1 00%
99%
1 00%
90%
1 00%
24%
99%
86%
28%
96%
1 00%
1 00%
92%
88%
60%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.48
0.16
0.16
0.38
0.21
0.87
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.37
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.81
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.17
0.14
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
Highest
(ppbv)
0.79
1.04
8.13
8.27
0.16
0.58
6.67
20.05
10.85
2.20
5.44
32.03
7.09
0.41
91.12
3.20
2.45
9.58
29.50
100.00
1.71
1.91
0.26
2.68
5.22
14.41
16.24
6.01
1.71
1.39
0.55
3.37
2.57
8.13
3.63
4.94
3.95
1.08
Median
(ppbv)
0.16
0.36
0.24
1.55
0.16
0.16
0.82
0.43
1.76
0.27
0.58
0.54
0.58
0.20
0.71
0.58
0.52
0.18
0.19
2.64
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.44
1.19
0.57
0.44
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.34
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.19
0.43
0.34
2.22
0.16
0.18
1.23
1.51
2.44
0.65
0.90
2.30
0.98
0.20
5.91
0.71
0.68
0.71
1.92
8.45
0.37
0.35
0.26
0.39
0.73
2.00
0.79
0.79
0.29
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.34
0.80
0.42
0.48
0.46
0.35
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.17
0.38
0.25
1.73
0.16
0.17
0.92
0.45
1.97
0.50
0.63
0.59
0.59
0.20
1.02
0.55
0.54
0.24
0.32
3.22
0.30
0.29
0.26
0.31
0.48
1.27
0.49
0.48
0.24
0.24
0.26
0.21
0.23
0.37
0.27
0.23
0.28
0.29
Standard
Deviation
0.13
0.22
0.93
1.86
0.00
0.09
1.38
4.46
2.19
0.54
1.01
7.10
1.48
0.03
20.34
0.66
0.52
2.11
6.61
21.73
0.37
0.35
0.00
0.39
1.05
3.09
1.87
1.30
0.34
0.18
0.03
0.39
0.55
1.72
0.72
1.09
0.85
0.25
Coefficient
of Variation
1.44
1.93
0.37
1.19
0.00
1.94
0.89
0.34
1.11
1.21
0.89
0.32
0.67
7.74
0.29
1.09
1.31
0.34
0.29
0.39
1.01
1.00
0.00
0.98
0.70
0.65
0.42
0.61
0.87
1.47
7.52
0.67
0.62
0.47
0.59
0.44
0.54
1.44
                      12 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA

Samples
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
72
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
38
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39

Compound
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
Number of
Nondetects
0
72
0
11
10
27
65
0
57
3
71
64
0
0
0
0
0
39
0
0
2
0
0
0
26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
39
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
100%
0%
100%
85%
86%
63%
10%
100%
21%
96%
1%
11%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
95%
100%
100%
100%
33%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
56%
0%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.63
1.14
3.60
0.71
3.17
0.24
0.87
0.88
0.19
2.38
0.15
0.18
0.21
2.21
0.11
0.11
1.56
0.10
0.23
0.15
0.15
0.48
0.21
0.21
0.30
0.53
Highest
(ppbv)
13.70
0.20
24.53
2.79
1.18
0.84
0.22
58.34
3.34
19.11
0.23
1.26
8.26
7.34
18.45
9.07
19.89
0.24
4.74
3.60
0.60
17.18
0.79
0.88
0.21
31.17
0.94
1.31
8.69
2.87
1.02
0.71
1.16
1.41
0.90
0.21
1.42
1.62
Median
(ppbv)
0.41
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.46
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
3.20
2.10
6.90
1.54
6.64
0.24
1.62
1.44
0.19
4.51
0.30
0.41
0.21
6.87
0.40
0.54
3.30
0.42
0.46
0.37
0.50
0.77
0.21
0.21
0.51
0.81
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.26
0.20
0.76
0.32
0.29
0.17
0.22
1.36
0.30
0.70
0.23
0.26
3.69
2.78
8.26
2.05
7.52
0.24
2.05
1.61
0.23
6.16
0.31
0.44
0.21
8.06
0.44
0.61
3.80
0.73
0.51
0.39
0.55
0.77
0.26
0.21
0.56
0.92
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.54
0.20
0.36
0.19
0.25
0.14
0.22
0.45
0.24
0.37
0.23
0.24
3.31
2.39
7.49
1.78
6.61
0.24
1.81
1.53
0.21
5.05
0.27
0.41
0.21
6.64
0.40
0.55
3.47
0.52
0.47
0.36
0.47
0.75
0.24
0.21
0.52
0.86
Standard
Deviation
3.03
0.00
2.86
0.60
0.21
0.18
0.00
6.83
0.46
2.23
0.00
0.18
1.89
1.77
3.80
1.44
3.96
0.00
1.08
0.55
0.11
4.14
0.19
0.19
0.00
5.69
0.18
0.27
1.73
0.66
0.22
0.16
0.29
0.22
0.15
0.00
0.25
0.34
Coefficient
of Variation
0.42
NA
0.27
0.53
1.34
0.99
0.00
0.20
0.66
0.31
0.00
1.46
1.95
1.57
2.17
1.42
1.90
NA
1.90
2.92
2.16
1.49
1.67
2.37
0.00
1.42
2.38
2.24
2.20
1.10
2.28
2.50
1.87
3.48
1.76
NA
2.22
2.69
                      13 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
0
0
33
0
39
0
34
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
0
1
0
19
0
2
34
1
0
0
5
1 00%
1 00%
15%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
13%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
59%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
67%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
38%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
1 00%
51%
1 00%
95%
13%
97%
1 00%
1 00%
87%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.86
0.70
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.85
0.16
0.16
0.49
0.21
1.27
0.27
0.38
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.18
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
1.46
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.59
0.14
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.44
0.19
0.14
Highest
(ppbv)
5.25
3.50
0.16
0.91
0.24
4.39
0.40
0.16
2.38
1.29
5.19
2.54
2.90
1.50
3.15
1.10
3.13
3.08
1.21
0.50
1.08
16.29
0.53
0.57
0.26
0.82
1.44
4.27
1.98
1.59
5.72
0.62
0.26
1.17
0.85
2.59
1.02
0.87
Median
(ppbv)
2.38
1.31
0.16
0.54
0.24
1.54
0.16
0.16
0.95
0.54
2.05
0.55
0.69
0.71
0.65
0.20
1.06
0.58
0.52
0.18
0.44
4.18
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.63
1.77
0.83
0.73
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.43
1.29
0.53
0.14
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
2.66
1.55
0.16
0.54
0.24
1.80
0.16
0.16
1.06
0.60
2.45
0.63
0.88
0.77
0.85
0.22
1.35
0.67
0.56
0.20
0.48
5.19
0.26
0.27
0.26
0.34
0.67
1.95
0.86
0.77
0.42
0.30
0.26
0.26
0.40
1.35
0.54
0.27
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
2.41
1.41
0.16
0.50
0.24
1.65
0.16
0.16
0.98
0.55
2.27
0.50
0.77
0.68
0.70
0.21
1.16
0.54
0.50
0.19
0.41
4.28
0.25
0.27
0.26
0.31
0.60
1.73
0.76
0.69
0.26
0.28
0.26
0.23
0.36
1.27
0.47
0.22
Standard
Deviation
1.20
0.71
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.83
0.04
0.00
0.45
0.26
1.04
0.48
0.51
0.37
0.60
0.15
0.76
0.53
0.25
0.07
0.26
3.52
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.16
0.32
0.94
0.38
0.34
0.91
0.15
0.00
0.21
0.18
0.44
0.24
0.18
Coefficient
of Variation
2.21
2.19
0.00
3.13
NA
2.18
4.11
NA
2.34
2.31
2.35
1.30
1.71
2.09
1.41
1.51
1.78
1.27
2.24
2.95
1.82
1.48
5.64
4.16
0.00
2.06
2.14
2.07
2.26
2.24
0.46
2.09
0.00
1.23
2.24
3.08
2.20
1.46
                      14 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO

Samples
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
70
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73

Compound
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Number of
Nondetects
0
13
0
39
1
0
0
0
2
0
25
0
39
29
0
0
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
38
71
Frequency
of Detects
100%
67%
100%
0%
97%
100%
100%
100%
95%
100%
36%
100%
0%
26%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
73%
100%
99%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
48%
3%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.27
0.22
1.19
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
3.85
2.84
8.82
1.85
5.72
0.24
2.19
1.10
0.19
5.68
0.35
0.46
0.21
7.92
0.11
0.11
5.18
0.34
0.44
0.38
0.32
0.59
0.21
0.21
Highest
(ppbv)
0.88
2.97
2.09
0.20
6.07
1.54
6.11
2.52
1.27
19.10
0.54
12.01
0.23
1.37
36.38
31.14
122.36
11.30
72.30
0.24
28.40
7.10
2.44
59.70
2.73
2.66
0.56
78.01
1.76
3.43
45.66
2.05
3.13
1.74
3.67
2.65
1.49
0.21
Median
(ppbv)
0.43
0.81
0.99
0.20
0.76
0.71
1.27
0.69
0.55
3.03
0.23
0.52
0.23
0.23
9.02
6.64
22.25
3.92
15.85
0.24
6.65
2.56
0.64
15.00
0.88
0.88
0.21
20.60
0.74
0.94
13.18
0.82
1.07
0.71
1.03
1.22
0.21
0.21
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.41
0.92
1.08
0.20
1.10
0.79
1.51
0.82
0.53
4.13
0.23
1.10
0.23
0.26
11.41
8.54
28.06
4.69
18.83
0.24
7.99
2.93
0.77
17.39
1.04
1.04
0.23
26.63
0.82
1.12
15.80
0.89
1.24
0.80
1.29
1.37
0.42
0.21
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.37
0.61
0.94
0.20
0.78
0.73
1.09
0.72
0.43
3.15
0.23
0.53
0.23
0.24
9.56
6.92
22.56
4.22
15.39
0.24
6.56
2.68
0.62
14.65
0.89
0.94
0.22
22.73
0.72
0.91
13.92
0.82
1.11
0.74
1.08
1.29
0.34
0.21
Standard
Deviation
0.20
0.75
0.51
0.00
1.29
0.28
1.22
0.46
0.32
4.24
0.05
2.07
0.00
0.19
8.02
6.81
25.40
2.37
15.52
0.00
6.08
1.36
0.52
12.41
0.61
0.53
0.07
16.05
0.37
0.70
8.89
0.35
0.62
0.33
0.79
0.49
0.34
0.00
Coefficient
of Variation
2.04
1.23
2.12
NA
0.85
2.79
1.23
1.77
1.64
0.97
4.64
0.53
NA
1.40
1.42
1.25
1.10
1.98
1.21
NA
1.31
2.15
1.48
1.40
1.70
1.95
3.31
1.66
2.20
1.59
1.78
2.51
2.00
2.41
1.62
2.78
1.26
0.00
                      15 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
0
0
0
0
27
0
73
0
67
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
63%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
8%
32%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
85%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
68%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
1 00%
99%
99%
1 00%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.57
0.87
2.51
1.68
0.16
0.23
0.24
2.50
0.16
0.16
1.28
0.56
2.13
0.65
1.08
0.75
0.61
0.20
0.98
1.02
0.18
0.18
0.43
5.13
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.80
2.06
0.14
1.09
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.47
1.22
Highest
(ppbv)
3.04
4.86
20.39
12.14
0.60
1.39
0.24
46.17
0.67
0.82
11.47
3.64
17.15
6.41
7.90
5.21
8.75
1.90
7.78
7.82
7.05
1.69
2.21
40.82
2.45
2.65
0.26
3.32
6.52
20.45
4.48
7.63
0.94
2.40
0.63
2.10
2.25
7.15
Median
(ppbv)
1.11
1.91
7.32
4.35
0.16
0.76
0.24
6.21
0.16
0.16
2.93
1.19
5.04
1.76
2.11
1.54
2.43
0.50
2.27
2.20
2.30
0.47
0.72
11.29
0.66
0.68
0.26
0.98
1.89
5.90
1.22
2.29
0.21
0.89
0.26
1.24
0.78
2.51
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.30
2.19
8.56
5.22
0.20
0.81
0.24
8.14
0.18
0.17
3.61
1.36
6.13
2.16
2.68
1.82
2.91
0.57
2.73
2.73
2.66
0.58
0.85
13.50
0.78
0.80
0.26
1.19
2.11
6.53
1.27
2.59
0.32
1.00
0.27
1.19
0.87
2.76
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1.19
2.00
7.65
4.63
0.19
0.78
0.24
6.96
0.17
0.16
3.16
1.25
5.46
1.91
2.36
1.66
2.51
0.47
2.46
2.40
2.38
0.48
0.79
11.77
0.64
0.65
0.26
1.06
1.89
5.73
1.14
2.32
0.29
0.91
0.26
1.08
0.81
2.55
Standard
Deviation
0.59
1.00
4.31
2.75
0.11
0.23
0.00
6.00
0.09
0.09
2.08
0.61
3.32
1.24
1.54
0.90
1.71
0.39
1.36
1.60
1.35
0.38
0.38
7.91
0.52
0.54
0.00
0.64
1.14
3.72
0.59
1.37
0.19
0.45
0.06
0.42
0.36
1.18
Coefficient
of Variation
2.18
2.20
1.99
1.90
1.93
3.60
NA
1.36
1.97
1.91
1.73
2.23
1.85
1.74
1.73
2.02
1.70
1.47
2.01
1.71
1.97
1.55
2.26
1.71
1.51
1.49
0.00
1.86
1.86
1.75
2.16
1.89
1.73
2.22
4.26
2.84
2.43
2.34
                      16 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA

Samples
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
29
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33

Compound
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
1
31
0
73
0
0
2
0
54
0
48
0
71
57
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
99%
58%
100%
0%
100%
100%
97%
100%
26%
100%
34%
100%
3%
22%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
48%
100%
100%
91%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.70
0.83
0.21
0.20
2.04
0.20
0.78
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.59
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
2.08
1.26
3.74
1.16
3.88
0.24
0.79
0.89
0.19
2.20
0.15
0.18
0.21
3.57
0.28
0.11
1.63
0.22
0.31
0.30
0.15
0.62
Highest
(ppbv)
3.63
4.28
3.71
1.17
11.20
0.20
3.62
2.24
1.09
0.68
1.26
4.58
2.64
4.18
2.94
3.60
8.41
6.78
12.50
4.04
15.24
0.24
77.38
2.61
0.70
17.76
0.72
0.83
0.21
119.46
0.99
1.43
9.05
2.97
1.25
0.81
1.43
1.74
Median
(ppbv)
1.24
1.65
1.42
0.20
4.08
0.20
1.67
0.85
0.21
0.29
0.22
1.56
0.23
0.63
0.23
0.23
3.52
2.52
7.41
1.93
6.89
0.24
1.82
1.39
0.19
4.69
0.38
0.46
0.21
12.30
0.46
0.49
3.43
0.41
0.52
0.39
0.42
0.82
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.43
1.79
1.52
0.37
4.48
0.20
1.79
1.00
0.37
0.28
0.23
1.74
0.27
0.78
0.26
0.29
4.05
3.30
7.35
2.16
7.10
0.24
4.35
1.51
0.25
6.57
0.39
0.49
0.21
16.34
0.50
0.55
3.88
0.87
0.61
0.47
0.55
0.92
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1.32
1.67
1.38
0.30
4.17
0.20
1.68
0.89
0.32
0.24
0.22
1.58
0.24
0.60
0.23
0.24
3.72
2.90
7.05
2.03
6.61
0.24
2.06
1.44
0.23
5.48
0.34
0.44
0.21
11.38
0.47
0.42
3.47
0.60
0.56
0.45
0.43
0.88
Standard
Deviation
0.60
0.70
0.66
0.28
1.77
0.00
0.68
0.46
0.22
0.14
0.12
0.83
0.29
0.65
0.32
0.40
1.86
1.72
2.17
0.80
2.84
0.00
13.15
0.48
0.15
4.34
0.18
0.19
0.00
21.25
0.19
0.37
1.93
0.83
0.28
0.16
0.37
0.32
Coefficient
of Variation
2.37
2.56
2.29
1.35
2.54
NA
2.64
2.18
1.68
2.05
1.88
2.11
0.91
1.21
0.83
0.72
2.18
1.92
3.39
2.69
2.50
NA
0.33
3.13
1.64
1.51
2.14
2.56
0.00
0.77
2.57
1.48
2.00
1.05
2.18
2.96
1.51
2.93
                      17 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
17
33
0
0
0
0
26
0
33
0
30
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
23
0
1
0
0
0
30
0
0
18
48%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
21%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
9%
3%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
82%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
85%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
30%
1 00%
97%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
9%
1 00%
1 00%
45%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.21
0.21
0.30
0.57
1.33
0.74
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.96
0.16
0.16
0.61
0.42
1.56
0.27
0.45
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.76
0.25
0.42
0.18
0.19
2.05
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.83
0.14
0.38
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
Highest
(ppbv)
0.78
0.21
1.16
2.24
8.35
11.05
0.16
1.00
0.24
46.95
0.16
0.16
12.03
1.49
5.91
6.37
3.00
2.58
4.02
0.55
3.87
1.91
2.20
0.63
1.24
11.82
0.59
0.69
0.56
1.28
3.25
8.35
7.13
3.29
0.45
0.86
0.91
6.73
Median
(ppbv)
0.21
0.21
0.56
1.07
3.66
2.08
0.16
0.58
0.24
2.26
0.16
0.16
1.29
0.60
2.52
0.72
0.90
0.75
0.92
0.20
1.19
0.68
0.63
0.18
0.52
4.94
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.79
2.22
1.01
1.18
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.26
0.21
0.58
1.11
3.65
3.00
0.16
0.60
0.24
7.38
0.16
0.16
2.52
0.71
2.85
1.11
1.04
0.89
1.11
0.24
1.45
0.77
0.79
0.23
0.56
5.31
0.30
0.32
0.26
0.42
1.02
2.81
1.46
1.39
0.22
0.31
0.29
0.86
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.24
0.21
0.54
1.05
3.25
2.27
0.16
0.57
0.24
3.18
0.16
0.16
1.63
0.66
2.68
0.70
0.94
0.78
0.87
0.22
1.32
0.66
0.70
0.21
0.50
4.65
0.28
0.30
0.26
0.36
0.83
2.31
1.11
1.26
0.21
0.28
0.27
0.33
Standard
Deviation
0.13
0.00
0.22
0.42
1.76
2.84
0.00
0.15
0.00
13.59
0.00
0.00
3.27
0.28
1.14
1.41
0.55
0.51
0.86
0.10
0.74
0.44
0.45
0.13
0.26
2.85
0.11
0.14
0.05
0.26
0.69
1.81
1.53
0.69
0.04
0.17
0.12
1.86
Coefficient
of Variation
1.96
NA
2.68
2.65
2.07
1.06
0.00
3.90
NA
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.77
2.49
2.51
0.79
1.89
1.74
1.29
2.30
1.97
1.77
1.76
1.78
2.16
1.86
2.58
2.26
4.95
1.63
1.48
1.55
0.95
2.03
5.14
1.84
2.30
0.46
                      18 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA

Samples
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
24
32
32
32
32
32
32

Compound
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
0
1
3
10
0
33
0
0
4
1
19
0
22
0
33
27
0
0
0
0
0
32
0
0
16
0
0
0
26
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
100%
97%
91%
70%
100%
0%
100%
100%
88%
97%
42%
100%
33%
100%
0%
18%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
50%
100%
100%
100%
19%
100%
100%
78%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.18
0.38
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.64
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.06
0.73
3.21
0.62
3.23
0.24
0.57
0.74
0.19
0.26
0.15
0.18
0.21
1.32
0.11
0.11
1.04
0.10
0.11
0.15
Highest
(ppbv)
2.37
7.35
3.46
2.94
2.17
2.48
5.50
0.20
3.83
2.18
1.23
1.86
0.45
11.69
0.56
4.43
0.23
0.23
8.38
7.85
14.25
4.48
23.35
0.24
22.14
23.27
0.91
17.85
0.48
0.54
0.21
14.68
1.24
0.65
7.01
2.69
0.93
0.62
Median
(ppbv)
0.18
0.90
0.42
0.36
0.21
0.60
1.01
0.20
0.47
0.14
0.21
0.64
0.22
1.14
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
2.65
1.57
7.30
1.35
8.97
0.24
1.61
1.25
0.19
4.16
0.32
0.41
0.21
4.02
0.45
0.24
1.98
0.38
0.35
0.34
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.36
1.28
0.60
0.52
0.49
0.67
1.45
0.20
0.56
0.31
0.30
0.68
0.22
1.58
0.24
0.62
0.23
0.23
3.02
1.88
7.20
1.82
9.44
0.24
2.41
3.96
0.22
4.88
0.27
0.37
0.21
5.68
0.48
0.24
2.49
0.69
0.40
0.30
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.27
1.01
0.45
0.37
0.36
0.46
1.22
0.20
0.41
0.22
0.26
0.61
0.22
1.23
0.23
0.40
0.23
0.23
2.64
1.61
6.74
1.53
8.29
0.24
1.65
1.78
0.21
3.82
0.24
0.33
0.21
4.61
0.41
0.20
2.25
0.46
0.37
0.27
Standard
Deviation
0.42
1.29
0.62
0.55
0.48
0.61
1.05
0.00
0.64
0.40
0.23
0.33
0.04
1.89
0.06
0.82
0.00
0.00
1.63
1.35
2.67
1.21
4.92
0.00
3.74
7.11
0.14
3.61
0.13
0.14
0.00
3.89
0.28
0.14
1.26
0.63
0.16
0.12
Coefficient
of Variation
0.87
0.99
0.97
0.95
1.01
1.11
1.38
NA
0.87
0.78
1.30
2.04
5.36
0.83
4.06
0.75
0.00
0.00
1.85
1.40
2.70
1.50
1.92
NA
0.64
0.56
1.61
1.35
2.17
2.67
0.00
1.46
1.73
1.64
1.97
1.10
2.52
2.40
                      19 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
3
0
8
32
0
0
0
0
29
0
32
0
32
32
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
18
0
0
4
1
12
0
2
0
2
0
15
2
91%
1 00%
75%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
9%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
0%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
94%
1 00%
1 00%
81%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
44%
1 00%
1 00%
88%
97%
63%
1 00%
94%
1 00%
94%
1 00%
53%
94%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.27
0.20
0.57
0.51
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.36
0.16
0.16
0.33
0.21
0.94
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.39
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.78
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.17
0.14
0.16
0.21
0.21
Highest
(ppbv)
0.88
3.62
1.41
0.21
0.66
6.64
17.73
9.46
0.16
2.14
0.24
2.85
0.16
0.16
1.57
1.07
11.37
4.10
2.53
1.27
1.31
2.01
2.42
1.78
0.88
0.47
0.91
8.25
0.65
0.26
1.16
1.70
1.53
4.41
2.63
2.01
2.93
0.89
Median
(ppbv)
0.15
0.64
0.21
0.21
0.43
0.63
1.70
0.85
0.16
0.57
0.24
1.12
0.16
0.16
0.73
0.53
1.62
0.63
0.48
0.57
0.49
0.20
0.74
0.25
0.44
0.18
0.19
2.41
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.41
1.10
1.18
0.55
0.21
0.21
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.26
0.73
0.41
0.21
0.43
0.95
2.50
1.22
0.16
0.71
0.24
1.27
0.16
0.16
0.77
0.47
2.65
1.09
0.62
0.54
0.48
0.45
0.86
0.55
0.44
0.20
0.33
2.87
0.29
0.26
0.38
0.50
0.43
1.21
1.16
0.63
0.54
0.31
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.21
0.64
0.31
0.21
0.42
0.69
1.89
0.95
0.16
0.56
0.24
1.14
0.16
0.16
0.72
0.42
2.00
0.68
0.47
0.47
0.42
0.29
0.79
0.43
0.38
0.19
0.29
2.44
0.28
0.26
0.32
0.37
0.35
0.99
0.98
0.50
0.30
0.27
Standard
Deviation
0.20
0.55
0.36
0.00
0.10
1.27
3.00
1.56
0.00
0.55
0.00
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.21
2.62
1.23
0.54
0.28
0.27
0.59
0.43
0.45
0.22
0.07
0.19
1.74
0.12
0.00
0.30
0.50
0.31
0.82
0.55
0.44
0.84
0.21
Coefficient
of Variation
1.27
1.31
1.12
NA
4.40
0.75
0.83
0.78
0.00
1.27
NA
2.15
NA
NA
2.57
2.21
1.01
0.89
1.14
1.93
1.82
0.77
2.02
1.23
1.98
2.79
1.72
1.65
2.49
0.00
1.29
0.99
1.40
1.48
2.12
1.42
0.64
1.48
                      20 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ

Samples
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21

Compound
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
Number of
Nondetects
3
25
0
0
0
4
3
11
0
32
0
0
5
11
24
0
20
1
31
25
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
91%
22%
100%
100%
100%
88%
91%
66%
100%
0%
100%
100%
84%
66%
25%
100%
38%
97%
3%
22%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
95%
100%
81%
100%
95%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.17
1.76
2.54
1.93
2.85
0.24
1.17
3.51
0.19
2.13
0.15
0.18
0.21
4.32
0.11
0.66
2.45
0.49
Highest
(ppbv)
2.92
1.22
0.84
1.49
0.79
0.81
1.47
1.91
1.87
0.20
2.74
0.62
1.19
0.99
0.89
10.18
1.38
7.25
0.23
0.87
20.91
14.32
19.34
10.64
42.19
0.24
12.38
12.22
1.89
27.27
1.43
1.49
0.63
67.76
1.66
3.92
102.80
3.95
Median
(ppbv)
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.50
0.19
0.31
0.21
0.58
0.82
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.59
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
4.59
3.03
4.22
3.20
5.73
0.24
2.21
4.99
0.19
3.97
0.35
0.39
0.21
9.42
0.46
1.29
5.16
2.10
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.57
0.32
0.28
0.57
0.37
0.34
0.34
0.63
0.80
0.20
0.54
0.25
0.29
0.24
0.28
1.16
0.26
0.72
0.23
0.27
7.07
4.74
6.87
4.02
9.49
0.24
3.62
5.76
0.55
6.86
0.48
0.50
0.26
19.26
0.56
1.55
12.31
2.19
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.34
0.25
0.25
0.44
0.31
0.27
0.29
0.47
0.66
0.20
0.38
0.20
0.25
0.17
0.25
0.60
0.24
0.40
0.23
0.25
5.63
3.72
5.54
3.49
7.14
0.24
2.72
5.41
0.37
5.16
0.33
0.38
0.24
13.57
0.47
1.37
6.88
1.93
Standard
Deviation
0.84
0.30
0.17
0.38
0.22
0.21
0.26
0.48
0.46
0.00
0.56
0.17
0.21
0.26
0.18
1.88
0.20
1.27
0.00
0.14
5.39
3.85
5.18
2.57
9.03
0.00
3.17
2.33
0.57
6.30
0.44
0.39
0.13
17.90
0.37
0.88
21.74
1.02
Coefficient
of Variation
0.68
1.06
1.68
1.50
1.68
1.58
1.30
1.31
1.74
NA
0.96
1.41
1.37
0.93
1.53
0.62
1.28
0.56
0.00
1.88
1.31
1.23
1.33
1.57
1.05
NA
1.14
2.47
0.98
1.09
1.09
1.29
2.00
1.08
1.52
1.75
0.57
2.14
                      21 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
0
2
0
0
15
19
0
0
0
0
1
1
21
0
20
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
1 00%
90%
1 00%
1 00%
29%
10%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
95%
95%
0%
1 00%
5%
62%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
38%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.28
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.45
0.77
1.95
1.13
0.16
0.23
0.24
1.24
0.16
0.16
1.38
0.93
1.59
0.75
0.57
1.72
0.46
0.20
0.18
0.25
0.75
0.18
0.84
5.05
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.72
1.90
0.42
0.98
Highest
(ppbv)
2.92
1.47
4.19
2.79
0.77
0.21
2.93
27.92
21.43
12.06
0.83
0.88
0.24
11.54
0.16
0.52
11.97
9.94
12.07
5.29
7.32
16.54
7.71
0.20
26.42
5.29
5.97
4.65
8.66
39.92
1.68
1.73
0.26
2.21
4.99
16.76
9.00
6.36
Median
(ppbv)
0.60
0.37
0.90
0.91
0.21
0.21
0.74
4.42
5.46
2.23
0.35
0.23
0.24
2.85
0.16
0.16
3.03
2.10
2.85
1.28
2.47
2.91
1.54
0.20
7.26
1.32
1.22
0.96
1.48
8.98
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.67
1.05
3.18
1.45
1.66
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.03
0.53
1.33
1.19
0.28
0.21
1.11
7.59
8.04
3.88
0.37
0.37
0.24
4.02
0.16
0.21
4.16
3.22
4.28
1.87
3.11
5.29
2.66
0.20
8.92
2.01
1.94
1.29
2.64
13.00
0.48
0.53
0.26
0.79
1.75
5.19
1.78
2.28
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.79
0.40
0.94
0.96
0.25
0.21
0.92
3.95
6.68
2.90
0.33
0.32
0.24
3.21
0.16
0.19
3.32
2.46
3.47
1.51
2.71
3.91
1.94
0.20
6.44
1.46
1.54
1.01
1.98
10.23
0.37
0.41
0.26
0.64
1.40
4.06
1.39
1.94
Standard
Deviation
0.82
0.41
1.15
0.78
0.17
0.00
0.76
8.11
5.47
3.33
0.19
0.21
0.00
3.02
0.00
0.11
3.15
2.69
3.22
1.36
1.69
4.65
2.26
0.00
6.62
1.63
1.52
1.05
2.29
10.69
0.41
0.43
0.00
0.54
1.37
4.24
1.78
1.49
Coefficient
of Variation
1.26
1.29
1.16
1.52
1.65
0.00
1.45
0.94
1.47
1.16
1.98
1.71
NA
1.33
0.00
1.87
1.32
1.20
1.33
1.37
1.84
1.14
1.18
NA
1.35
1.23
1.28
1.24
1.15
1.22
1.17
1.21
0.00
1.47
1.28
1.22
1.00
1.53
                      22 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
PSAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ

Samples
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16

Compound
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
Number of
Nondetects
11
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
11
15
0
21
0
0
20
2
3
0
1
0
20
13
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
15
0
9
4
16
1
3
13
Frequency
of Detects
48%
100%
100%
38%
100%
100%
100%
100%
48%
29%
100%
0%
100%
100%
5%
90%
86%
100%
95%
100%
5%
38%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
6%
100%
44%
75%
0%
94%
81%
19%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.65
0.44
0.14
0.21
0.20
1.12
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.49
0.13
1.20
0.13
0.57
0.24
0.19
1.78
0.19
0.26
0.15
0.18
0.21
0.21
0.11
0.11
Highest
(ppbv)
0.79
5.01
0.59
2.50
1.44
6.79
4.05
2.59
2.02
2.51
7.46
0.20
2.30
4.82
0.21
1.15
0.58
5.91
2.25
5.16
0.23
0.68
1.79
0.91
7.84
0.89
5.41
0.24
1.53
28.04
0.19
2.77
0.15
0.18
0.21
41.58
0.68
0.61
Median
(ppbv)
0.21
0.53
0.26
0.20
0.50
1.22
0.62
0.50
0.21
0.20
2.58
0.20
0.74
2.68
0.21
0.33
0.22
0.60
0.23
0.47
0.23
0.23
0.73
0.34
2.02
0.34
1.19
0.24
0.56
4.03
0.19
0.55
0.15
0.18
0.21
1.95
0.11
0.11
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.31
0.81
0.27
0.65
0.53
1.89
1.04
0.86
0.62
0.54
3.28
0.20
0.86
2.65
0.21
0.40
0.24
0.88
0.39
0.77
0.23
0.28
0.81
0.42
2.63
0.39
1.62
0.24
0.66
6.12
0.19
0.76
0.15
0.18
0.21
8.03
0.15
0.17
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.27
0.50
0.27
0.40
0.40
1.49
0.82
0.62
0.42
0.33
2.94
0.20
0.75
2.25
0.21
0.33
0.23
0.60
0.30
0.53
0.23
0.26
0.75
0.36
2.19
0.35
1.33
0.24
0.54
4.51
0.19
0.57
0.15
0.18
0.21
2.65
0.13
0.14
Standard
Deviation
0.20
1.06
0.07
0.70
0.40
1.55
0.89
0.73
0.59
0.66
1.69
0.00
0.47
1.09
0.00
0.27
0.09
1.20
0.45
1.05
0.00
0.14
0.37
0.22
1.97
0.21
1.26
0.00
0.41
6.64
0.00
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.51
0.14
0.15
Coefficient
of Variation
1.58
0.77
3.79
0.94
1.33
1.22
1.17
1.18
1.05
0.82
1.94
NA
1.81
2.44
0.00
1.52
2.67
0.73
0.87
0.74
0.00
1.97
2.19
1.88
1.33
1.91
1.29
NA
1.60
0.92
0.00
1.12
0.00
0.00
NA
0.59
1.05
1.18
                      23 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
8
0
4
2
5
1
12
16
2
0
0
0
15
1
16
0
16
16
0
0
0
1
1
1
10
13
0
0
0
12
1
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
50%
1 00%
75%
88%
69%
94%
25%
0%
88%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
6%
94%
0%
1 00%
0%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
94%
94%
94%
38%
19%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
25%
94%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
31%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.13
0.10
0.11
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.08
0.20
0.46
0.16
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.15
0.16
0.16
0.12
0.21
0.23
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.18
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.37
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.17
Highest
(ppbv)
82.41
1.00
0.31
0.15
0.78
0.71
1.04
0.21
0.79
0.56
6.73
1.15
0.16
1.38
0.24
0.80
0.16
0.16
0.78
0.48
1.84
0.81
1.11
0.87
0.83
0.20
2.26
0.25
1.18
0.18
0.74
14.64
0.61
0.72
0.26
2.91
0.46
1.49
Median
(ppbv)
0.88
0.68
0.11
0.15
0.23
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.20
1.27
0.16
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.15
0.16
0.16
0.37
0.21
0.74
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.60
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
2.76
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.41
0.17
0.40
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
7.11
0.65
0.15
0.15
0.37
0.24
0.29
0.21
0.25
0.25
1.69
0.34
0.16
0.32
0.24
0.31
0.16
0.16
0.36
0.24
0.73
0.30
0.38
0.34
0.25
0.20
0.75
0.25
0.34
0.18
0.22
3.86
0.29
0.32
0.26
0.70
0.21
0.49
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.83
0.59
0.14
0.15
0.29
0.22
0.25
0.21
0.20
0.23
1.30
0.27
0.16
0.27
0.24
0.26
0.16
0.16
0.30
0.23
0.64
0.29
0.29
0.31
0.23
0.20
0.63
0.25
0.27
0.18
0.20
2.78
0.28
0.30
0.26
0.50
0.19
0.39
Standard
Deviation
20.29
0.23
0.07
0.00
0.25
0.13
0.22
0.00
0.19
0.13
1.54
0.27
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.09
0.38
0.13
0.29
0.20
0.17
0.00
0.52
0.00
0.28
0.00
0.14
3.46
0.12
0.15
0.00
0.70
0.09
0.36
Coefficient
of Variation
0.35
2.86
2.19
0.00
1.49
1.91
1.28
NA
1.35
2.01
1.10
1.25
0.00
1.11
NA
1.50
NA
NA
1.71
2.56
1.95
2.26
1.28
1.76
1.51
0.00
1.44
0.00
1.19
0.00
1.60
1.12
2.47
2.16
0.00
1.00
2.32
1.34
                      24 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
QVAZ
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD

Samples
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75

Compound
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
15
1
3
13
6
1
1
12
11
12
0
16
3
2
11
9
8
0
5
0
15
11
0
0
0
0
0
75
0
0
42
0
0
0
60
1
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
6%
94%
81%
19%
63%
94%
94%
25%
31%
25%
100%
0%
81%
88%
31%
44%
50%
100%
69%
100%
6%
31%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
44%
100%
100%
100%
20%
99%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.31
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
1.23
0.67
1.93
0.64
3.83
0.24
0.61
0.69
0.19
1.64
0.15
0.18
0.21
0.21
Highest
(ppbv)
4.04
1.03
0.21
0.66
0.26
0.96
0.37
0.74
0.52
0.14
0.21
0.61
1.25
0.20
0.88
0.68
0.78
0.36
0.68
3.78
0.89
2.84
0.23
0.58
7.10
5.66
15.17
3.15
22.82
0.24
14.14
5.05
0.60
27.35
2.41
2.61
4.58
68.52
Median
(ppbv)
0.81
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.76
0.23
0.37
0.23
0.23
2.04
1.75
6.31
1.07
6.78
0.24
1.49
1.29
0.19
3.78
0.15
0.39
0.21
5.23
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.23
0.27
0.21
0.24
0.26
0.29
0.19
0.23
0.21
0.14
0.21
0.25
0.35
0.20
0.25
0.21
0.30
0.17
0.27
1.06
0.29
0.61
0.23
0.26
2.59
2.05
6.80
1.23
7.59
0.24
1.89
1.52
0.21
5.23
0.31
0.43
0.27
10.19
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.96
0.22
0.21
0.23
0.26
0.25
0.19
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.23
0.31
0.20
0.23
0.18
0.27
0.15
0.25
0.76
0.26
0.43
0.23
0.25
2.31
1.76
6.30
1.15
6.96
0.24
1.53
1.41
0.20
4.14
0.23
0.35
0.22
6.18
Standard
Deviation
1.10
0.23
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.23
0.05
0.16
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.26
0.00
0.18
0.17
0.18
0.08
0.14
1.05
0.18
0.67
0.00
0.11
1.47
1.23
2.77
0.54
3.64
0.00
1.80
0.71
0.08
4.81
0.38
0.38
0.51
14.02
Coefficient
of Variation
1.12
1.16
0.00
2.13
0.00
1.29
4.07
1.44
2.62
0.00
0.00
1.89
1.36
NA
1.45
1.25
1.70
2.04
1.87
1.01
1.58
0.92
0.00
2.49
1.76
1.67
2.46
2.28
2.08
NA
1.05
2.12
2.50
1.09
0.82
1.12
0.54
0.73
                      25 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
0
6
0
0
0
0
1
0
34
75
0
0
0
0
68
0
75
0
73
72
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
29
0
0
0
59
0
0
1
0
51
0
1 00%
92%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
99%
1 00%
55%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
9%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
3%
4%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
61%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
21%
1 00%
1 00%
99%
1 00%
32%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.11
0.11
1.47
0.10
0.22
0.15
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.20
0.44
0.72
0.48
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.15
0.16
0.16
0.36
0.21
0.23
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.20
0.18
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
1.28
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
Highest
(ppbv)
4.05
4.69
40.38
7.48
5.99
3.22
6.88
2.62
1.42
0.21
2.94
3.87
16.69
12.80
0.94
1.17
0.24
33.49
0.47
0.70
8.69
2.63
18.94
8.68
3.73
2.74
6.09
0.94
12.39
3.60
2.57
1.20
1.85
120.77
0.96
0.85
0.80
1.72
Median
(ppbv)
0.36
0.32
2.29
0.49
0.33
0.32
0.30
0.58
0.21
0.21
0.39
0.62
1.60
0.90
0.16
0.53
0.24
1.06
0.16
0.16
0.61
0.46
1.68
0.27
0.50
0.55
0.48
0.20
0.85
0.25
0.41
0.18
0.19
2.23
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.57
0.47
3.61
0.92
0.53
0.38
0.49
0.68
0.32
0.21
0.49
0.76
2.23
1.64
0.18
0.50
0.24
3.07
0.16
0.17
1.27
0.50
2.27
0.65
0.72
0.58
0.69
0.22
1.23
0.49
0.45
0.21
0.32
7.44
0.27
0.28
0.26
0.40
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.41
0.32
2.58
0.56
0.39
0.29
0.28
0.63
0.27
0.21
0.42
0.69
1.78
1.11
0.17
0.45
0.24
1.35
0.16
0.16
0.78
0.42
1.82
0.43
0.58
0.47
0.46
0.21
0.94
0.38
0.37
0.19
0.26
3.32
0.26
0.27
0.26
0.33
Standard
Deviation
0.71
0.73
6.16
1.21
0.91
0.48
1.07
0.36
0.26
0.00
0.44
0.54
2.50
2.39
0.12
0.22
0.00
7.20
0.04
0.08
2.06
0.38
2.80
1.16
0.62
0.44
0.95
0.12
1.75
0.55
0.37
0.17
0.29
18.59
0.11
0.10
0.06
0.33
Coefficient
of Variation
0.81
0.64
0.59
0.76
0.58
0.78
0.46
1.89
1.26
NA
1.11
1.41
0.89
0.69
1.49
2.29
NA
0.43
3.73
2.02
0.62
1.32
0.81
0.56
1.16
1.31
0.72
1.84
0.70
0.90
1.24
1.26
1.09
0.40
2.45
2.79
4.17
1.21
                      26 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SFSD
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR

Samples
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Compound
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
2
0
54
0
8
57
4
0
0
14
0
19
0
75
0
0
4
4
22
0
61
1
72
64
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
97%
100%
28%
100%
89%
24%
95%
100%
100%
81%
100%
75%
100%
0%
100%
100%
95%
95%
71%
100%
19%
99%
4%
15%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.17
0.36
0.14
0.16
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.34
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
3.14
2.55
2.11
1.42
8.20
0.24
2.38
1.46
0.19
4.24
0.61
0.57
Highest
(ppbv)
4.83
12.03
26.28
5.10
0.76
8.04
0.63
9.84
1.14
3.34
2.02
1.59
3.38
2.33
6.37
0.20
7.95
1.41
2.81
2.29
0.69
26.17
2.21
27.83
0.23
4.94
10.71
8.12
4.33
4.36
39.86
0.24
17.11
5.67
1.54
28.72
3.69
2.87
Median
(ppbv)
0.44
1.15
0.76
0.48
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.84
0.41
0.14
0.21
0.47
0.66
0.20
0.56
0.42
0.51
0.45
0.22
2.29
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
6.39
4.57
3.06
3.00
23.83
0.24
8.09
2.89
0.63
14.96
1.56
1.43
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.63
1.69
1.34
0.69
0.23
0.44
0.27
0.72
0.28
0.92
0.42
0.25
0.37
0.64
0.89
0.20
1.12
0.47
0.66
0.50
0.25
3.63
0.25
1.54
0.23
0.37
6.30
4.77
3.19
2.79
24.51
0.24
8.32
3.11
0.64
15.94
1.77
1.51
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.46
1.30
0.72
0.53
0.22
0.29
0.26
0.30
0.25
0.82
0.35
0.19
0.28
0.46
0.65
0.20
0.60
0.40
0.47
0.40
0.24
2.44
0.23
0.48
0.23
0.25
6.00
4.58
3.12
2.66
22.44
0.24
7.08
2.91
0.56
13.73
1.58
1.37
Standard
Deviation
0.73
1.88
3.12
0.77
0.08
0.92
0.06
1.65
0.20
0.53
0.33
0.28
0.45
0.52
1.03
0.00
1.71
0.27
0.59
0.36
0.11
4.95
0.23
4.64
0.00
0.73
1.96
1.41
0.67
0.83
9.56
0.00
4.57
1.15
0.33
7.98
0.84
0.65
Coefficient
of Variation
0.85
0.90
0.43
0.90
2.69
0.48
4.77
0.44
1.45
1.73
1.28
0.90
0.82
1.21
0.86
NA
0.65
1.79
1.11
1.39
2.29
0.73
1.10
0.33
0.00
0.51
3.21
3.39
4.74
3.37
2.56
NA
1.82
2.69
1.94
2.00
2.12
2.33
                      27 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
17
0
0
0
0
1
0
17
0
16
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
82%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
71%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
94%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
6%
47%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
53%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
94%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.21
7.17
0.32
0.27
2.11
1.56
0.85
0.47
0.15
1.40
0.21
0.21
0.47
0.88
2.09
1.32
0.16
0.23
0.24
0.44
0.16
0.16
0.89
0.58
2.07
0.71
0.88
0.54
0.86
0.20
1.17
0.53
0.57
0.18
0.54
6.99
0.25
0.26
Highest
(ppbv)
0.63
39.13
1.50
2.15
18.31
6.28
3.74
1.76
3.49
3.54
0.59
0.21
1.58
3.11
7.91
5.41
0.65
0.78
0.24
6.55
0.38
0.36
4.60
2.14
5.56
6.38
5.26
3.69
5.72
1.46
5.84
3.60
2.02
1.05
2.02
34.83
1.27
1.25
Median
(ppbv)
0.21
23.56
0.78
1.09
7.62
2.84
2.48
1.08
1.58
2.25
0.21
0.21
0.99
1.87
5.14
3.25
0.36
0.63
0.24
3.24
0.16
0.16
2.40
0.91
3.80
1.74
2.36
1.47
2.54
0.20
1.99
1.78
1.09
0.18
0.85
14.91
0.25
0.60
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.25
24.78
0.78
1.05
7.95
3.13
2.41
1.12
1.65
2.29
0.27
0.21
1.01
1.87
5.10
3.29
0.35
0.62
0.24
3.43
0.17
0.18
2.47
1.06
3.70
2.49
2.36
1.56
2.50
0.35
2.43
1.73
1.14
0.36
0.98
16.19
0.45
0.54
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.24
22.24
0.71
0.92
6.93
2.86
2.19
1.04
1.32
2.19
0.25
0.21
0.96
1.77
4.76
3.04
0.31
0.60
0.24
2.88
0.16
0.17
2.22
0.99
3.59
2.06
2.08
1.37
2.06
0.27
2.15
1.49
1.07
0.30
0.91
14.95
0.38
0.47
Standard
Deviation
0.12
10.13
0.33
0.50
4.24
1.41
0.96
0.39
0.95
0.70
0.13
0.00
0.31
0.60
1.77
1.25
0.15
0.13
0.00
1.77
0.05
0.07
1.10
0.42
0.92
1.62
1.22
0.88
1.54
0.34
1.39
0.91
0.42
0.25
0.43
7.00
0.29
0.28
Coefficient
of Variation
2.10
2.45
2.36
2.10
1.88
2.22
2.52
2.86
1.74
3.28
2.05
NA
3.26
3.12
2.88
2.64
2.26
4.60
NA
1.94
3.11
2.68
2.25
2.50
4.03
1.54
1.93
1.77
1.62
1.02
1.75
1.91
2.72
1.43
2.29
2.31
1.54
1.89
                      28 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU

Samples
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71

Compound
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
Number of
Nondetects
10
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
15
13
0
17
0
0
16
11
13
0
4
0
15
5
0
0
0
0
0
71
0
0
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
41%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
59%
100%
100%
71%
100%
100%
100%
100%
12%
24%
100%
0%
100%
100%
6%
35%
24%
100%
76%
100%
12%
71%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.26
0.26
1.54
5.08
0.96
1.76
0.21
0.21
0.57
0.20
0.18
0.96
0.58
0.35
0.21
0.20
1.69
0.20
1.28
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.81
0.23
0.48
0.23
0.23
1.64
1.08
2.12
0.92
2.44
0.24
0.90
1.47
0.19
2.57
Highest
(ppbv)
0.26
3.08
13.17
54.30
6.03
14.79
0.21
1.73
2.50
1.07
0.88
3.02
1.58
1.78
1.18
2.18
4.90
0.20
9.47
1.03
18.14
0.43
0.22
9.31
0.53
7.87
0.23
1.41
24.73
24.20
26.15
10.00
55.29
0.24
21.53
7.58
1.96
48.35
Median
(ppbv)
0.26
0.78
2.89
9.65
1.79
3.39
0.21
0.73
0.84
0.20
0.61
1.85
1.06
1.20
0.21
0.20
3.22
0.20
2.22
0.66
0.21
0.12
0.22
1.76
0.23
1.27
0.23
0.23
7.34
5.53
5.50
3.33
7.97
0.24
5.03
2.96
0.58
13.33
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.26
0.87
3.88
14.66
2.08
4.52
0.21
0.88
1.04
0.37
0.61
1.80
1.03
1.13
0.29
0.57
3.23
0.20
2.70
0.63
1.27
0.18
0.22
2.58
0.26
1.94
0.23
0.36
8.48
7.38
8.30
3.68
11.36
0.24
6.14
3.20
0.60
15.30
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.26
0.75
3.18
11.36
1.90
3.78
0.21
0.77
0.92
0.31
0.58
1.72
0.99
1.03
0.25
0.32
3.10
0.20
2.33
0.55
0.28
0.16
0.22
2.06
0.25
1.45
0.23
0.29
7.19
5.82
6.38
3.26
8.82
0.24
4.76
3.01
0.49
12.40
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.62
3.10
13.40
1.13
3.38
0.00
0.45
0.61
0.27
0.19
0.56
0.29
0.42
0.26
0.75
0.91
0.00
1.97
0.27
4.35
0.11
0.00
2.14
0.10
1.85
0.00
0.31
5.11
5.30
6.61
1.97
11.28
0.00
4.93
1.20
0.37
10.45
Coefficient
of Variation
0.00
1.41
1.25
1.09
1.84
1.34
0.00
1.96
1.71
1.40
3.30
3.19
3.59
2.66
1.12
0.76
3.53
NA
1.37
2.35
0.29
1.64
0.00
1.21
2.60
1.05
0.00
1.14
1.66
1.39
1.26
1.86
1.01
NA
1.25
2.66
1.63
1.46
                      29 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
71
71
71
68
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
68
0
0
0
0
23
0
71
0
71
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
53
0
0
0
2
0
0
1 00%
1 00%
94%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
49%
4%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
68%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
0%
48%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
25%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
97%
1 00%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.30
0.42
0.21
3.07
0.11
0.43
2.63
0.30
0.46
0.36
0.15
0.46
0.21
0.21
0.39
0.68
1.58
0.58
0.16
0.48
0.24
1.11
0.16
0.16
0.75
0.48
1.39
0.27
0.54
0.58
0.20
0.20
0.68
0.25
0.18
0.18
0.19
2.25
Highest
(ppbv)
2.66
2.62
0.79
44.39
3.64
3.90
28.26
3.79
3.36
1.91
4.64
2.54
0.93
0.21
3.28
5.64
15.96
10.12
0.59
1.19
0.24
13.99
0.16
0.64
7.15
4.87
16.45
4.00
6.36
9.19
7.07
0.62
14.24
6.33
4.19
2.59
4.79
41.44
Median
(ppbv)
0.71
0.87
0.21
14.13
0.79
1.14
8.26
0.75
1.12
0.70
1.28
0.98
0.21
0.21
0.94
1.89
5.12
3.10
0.16
0.70
0.24
4.34
0.16
0.16
2.33
1.65
5.42
1.43
1.74
2.73
1.96
0.20
4.53
1.79
1.31
0.53
1.53
11.93
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.79
0.90
0.24
16.91
0.86
1.22
9.50
0.93
1.20
0.75
1.29
1.01
0.30
0.21
1.01
2.03
5.35
3.28
0.19
0.72
0.24
4.80
0.16
0.19
2.49
1.72
5.62
1.42
1.96
2.78
2.07
0.22
4.70
1.99
1.54
0.64
1.57
13.11
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.70
0.83
0.23
14.64
0.75
1.09
8.32
0.80
1.10
0.70
1.10
0.95
0.26
0.21
0.90
1.83
4.78
2.88
0.18
0.71
0.24
4.27
0.16
0.18
2.23
1.55
5.02
1.26
1.72
2.41
1.72
0.21
4.05
1.73
1.34
0.51
1.37
11.29
Standard
Deviation
0.44
0.40
0.12
9.14
0.50
0.64
5.15
0.57
0.56
0.31
0.76
0.35
0.19
0.00
0.53
0.93
2.59
1.66
0.09
0.15
0.00
2.36
0.00
0.11
1.20
0.81
2.83
0.70
1.08
1.52
1.22
0.08
2.58
1.13
0.91
0.46
0.85
7.70
Coefficient
of Variation
1.80
2.23
2.09
1.85
1.72
1.91
1.84
1.64
2.16
2.44
1.69
2.90
1.60
0.00
1.90
2.17
2.07
1.97
2.05
4.71
NA
2.04
NA
1.69
2.08
2.12
1.99
2.04
1.81
1.82
1.70
2.64
1.82
1.75
1.70
1.40
1.84
1.70
                      30 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO

Samples
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73

Compound
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
Number of
Nondetects
1
0
30
0
1
0
1
0
14
0
5
42
0
0
0
1
1
22
0
71
0
0
6
0
6
0
57
0
70
48
0
0
0
0
0
73
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
99%
100%
58%
100%
99%
100%
99%
100%
80%
100%
93%
41%
100%
100%
100%
99%
99%
69%
100%
0%
100%
100%
92%
100%
92%
100%
20%
100%
1%
32%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.17
0.66
0.14
0.48
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.75
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.27
0.20
0.20
0.38
0.21
0.12
0.22
1.26
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
3.10
2.23
5.79
1.17
4.26
0.24
1.67
1.50
Highest
(ppbv)
2.28
2.37
0.26
6.67
5.21
20.84
5.25
6.89
0.57
3.43
0.75
1.72
1.22
4.59
2.25
2.75
2.32
2.48
5.78
0.20
19.38
1.55
2.75
0.95
0.72
28.10
0.23
6.42
0.46
0.60
30.55
22.70
47.15
11.30
25.14
0.24
18.15
8.79
Median
(ppbv)
0.25
0.57
0.26
0.75
1.51
5.46
0.98
2.01
0.21
0.69
0.26
0.20
0.48
1.69
0.84
0.67
0.66
0.49
1.88
0.20
1.04
0.70
0.58
0.48
0.22
2.51
0.23
0.46
0.23
0.23
6.49
4.73
14.15
2.88
10.52
0.24
4.31
2.42
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.58
0.66
0.26
1.05
1.64
5.91
1.21
2.18
0.24
0.77
0.27
0.33
0.51
1.73
0.89
0.79
0.74
0.58
2.08
0.20
1.65
0.78
0.71
0.49
0.33
3.27
0.23
0.79
0.23
0.24
8.81
6.25
17.11
3.67
11.54
0.24
5.49
2.91
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.44
0.53
0.26
0.79
1.43
5.09
0.99
1.91
0.23
0.63
0.26
0.26
0.46
1.63
0.83
0.64
0.63
0.43
1.85
0.20
1.11
0.73
0.55
0.46
0.29
2.69
0.23
0.49
0.23
0.23
7.37
5.21
14.59
3.17
10.15
0.24
4.46
2.67
Standard
Deviation
0.49
0.47
0.00
0.99
0.88
3.39
0.86
1.18
0.09
0.55
0.07
0.33
0.23
0.66
0.36
0.53
0.42
0.48
1.02
0.00
2.50
0.27
0.52
0.16
0.16
3.57
0.00
1.12
0.03
0.06
6.03
4.38
9.74
2.16
5.82
0.00
3.83
1.38
Coefficient
of Variation
1.17
1.41
0.00
1.05
1.87
1.75
1.41
1.85
2.69
1.41
3.93
1.01
2.23
2.61
2.46
1.50
1.76
1.21
2.03
NA
0.66
2.83
1.36
3.07
2.01
0.92
0.00
0.71
8.08
3.87
1.46
1.43
1.76
1.70
1.99
NA
1.43
2.11
                      31 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
1 ,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
0
0
0
0
14
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
71
0
0
0
0
22
0
73
0
68
42
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
4
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
81%
1 00%
99%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
52%
3%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
70%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
7%
42%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
58%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
95%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.19
2.65
0.15
0.18
0.21
4.21
0.11
0.27
2.11
0.30
0.41
0.31
0.15
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.37
0.60
1.65
1.12
0.16
0.23
0.24
1.45
0.16
0.16
0.87
0.52
1.73
0.27
0.80
0.66
0.57
0.20
1.06
0.64
0.18
0.18
Highest
(ppbv)
2.44
45.87
2.73
2.66
0.77
66.71
4.38
3.67
45.66
14.86
3.64
1.96
4.51
2.58
2.68
0.21
2.39
15.00
20.39
12.14
0.60
1.23
0.24
46.17
0.67
0.45
11.47
3.64
17.15
5.70
7.90
5.21
8.75
1.21
10.64
7.82
5.42
2.18
Median
(ppbv)
0.48
10.54
0.61
0.73
0.21
15.17
0.69
0.91
9.25
1.01
0.97
0.66
0.92
1.09
0.21
0.21
0.96
1.96
6.42
3.78
0.16
0.69
0.24
5.29
0.16
0.16
2.53
1.15
4.10
1.50
2.00
1.48
2.39
0.20
2.52
2.03
1.76
0.44
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
0.64
12.47
0.77
0.85
0.23
17.47
0.87
1.14
10.79
1.25
1.18
0.76
1.21
1.19
0.41
0.21
1.02
2.63
7.03
4.29
0.20
0.70
0.24
6.33
0.17
0.17
2.96
1.27
4.88
1.64
2.35
1.71
2.64
0.35
3.13
2.20
1.85
0.55
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.49
9.69
0.62
0.74
0.22
14.57
0.71
0.92
7.84
0.99
1.03
0.69
0.96
1.09
0.31
0.21
0.90
2.08
5.91
3.58
0.18
0.67
0.24
4.81
0.16
0.16
2.45
1.15
4.10
1.30
2.01
1.51
2.22
0.29
2.80
1.84
1.55
0.42
Standard
Deviation
0.50
9.01
0.54
0.49
0.08
11.40
0.65
0.79
8.53
1.69
0.67
0.35
0.86
0.49
0.41
0.00
0.52
2.22
4.23
2.67
0.09
0.20
0.00
6.03
0.09
0.06
2.00
0.64
3.15
1.13
1.50
0.96
1.66
0.23
1.68
1.46
1.10
0.42
Coefficient
of Variation
1.28
1.38
1.43
1.74
2.76
1.53
1.33
1.44
1.27
0.74
1.76
2.14
1.41
2.41
1.00
0.00
1.96
1.19
1.66
1.61
2.13
3.56
NA
1.05
1.99
2.83
1.48
2.00
1.55
1.45
1.57
1.79
1.59
1.53
1.86
1.51
1.68
1.31
                      32 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D

Site
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ

Samples
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
9
9
9
9
9
9

Compound
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
Ethylene
Acetylene
Ethane
Propylene
Propane
Propyne
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
1
0
28
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
7
1
0
0
2
29
46
0
73
0
3
36
19
48
0
41
0
72
45
0
0
0
0
0
9
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
99%
100%
62%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
82%
100%
100%
90%
99%
100%
100%
97%
60%
37%
100%
0%
100%
96%
51%
74%
34%
100%
44%
100%
1%
38%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.43
5.80
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.97
2.06
0.14
1.35
0.21
0.44
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.54
0.19
0.14
0.21
0.20
0.98
0.20
0.78
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.59
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
3.22
1.78
3.92
1.80
10.44
0.24
Highest
(ppbv)
3.64
40.82
2.45
2.65
0.94
2.76
11.18
42.21
8.42
9.83
1.52
2.40
1.33
2.10
2.25
7.15
3.63
4.28
9.60
6.06
11.20
0.20
6.05
2.24
0.97
1.40
3.09
46.61
1.36
10.58
0.23
0.79
29.46
14.41
13.38
20.84
69.88
0.24
Median
(ppbv)
0.84
14.15
0.56
0.60
0.26
0.82
3.02
10.68
1.31
3.56
0.21
0.94
0.26
0.67
0.63
1.83
0.95
1.15
0.86
0.20
2.93
0.20
2.21
0.64
0.21
0.26
0.22
1.75
0.23
0.88
0.23
0.23
8.12
6.20
8.41
4.67
25.01
0.24
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
1.03
15.56
0.66
0.68
0.27
0.95
3.44
12.09
1.78
3.69
0.29
1.01
0.48
0.76
0.68
2.07
1.14
1.27
1.09
0.64
3.32
0.20
2.49
0.71
0.30
0.28
0.39
4.71
0.30
1.19
0.23
0.27
9.81
6.63
8.76
6.14
32.14
0.24
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.93
14.20
0.53
0.52
0.26
0.80
2.96
9.93
1.36
3.30
0.26
0.94
0.41
0.53
0.56
1.70
0.97
0.99
0.66
0.33
2.81
0.20
2.21
0.57
0.27
0.23
0.27
2.23
0.26
0.80
0.23
0.25
7.91
5.64
8.08
4.71
26.29
0.24
Standard
Deviation
0.55
7.15
0.48
0.53
0.09
0.56
1.92
7.57
1.66
1.75
0.21
0.43
0.28
0.56
0.42
1.37
0.68
0.86
1.31
1.12
2.04
0.00
1.24
0.46
0.20
0.22
0.56
9.02
0.22
1.42
0.00
0.13
7.92
3.81
3.48
5.78
21.86
0.00
Coefficient
of Variation
1.88
2.17
1.36
1.27
2.97
1.69
1.79
1.60
1.07
2.10
1.39
2.36
1.69
1.34
1.63
1.51
1.68
1.48
0.84
0.57
1.63
NA
2.01
1.54
1.53
1.26
0.70
0.52
1.34
0.84
0.00
2.04
1.24
1.74
2.52
1.06
1.47
NA
                      33 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Site
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
Samples
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Compound
Isobutane
lsobutene/1-Butene
1 ,3-Butadiene
n-Butane
trans-2-Butene
cis-2-Butene
3-Methyl-1-butene
Isopentane
1-Pentene
2-Methyl-1-butene
n-Pentane
Isoprene
trans-2-Pentene
cis-2-Pentene
2-Methyl-2-butene
2,2-Dimethylbutane
Cyclopentene
4-Methyl-1-pentene
Cyclopentane
2,3-Dimethylbutane
2-Methylpentane
3-Methylpentane
2-Methyl-1-pentene
1-Hexene
2-Ethyl-1-butene
n-Hexane
trans-2-Hexene
cis-2-Hexene
Methylcyclopentane
2,4-Dimethylpentane
Benzene
Cyclohexane
2-Methylhexane
2,3-Dimethylpentane
3-Methylhexane
1-Heptene
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Heptane
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
89%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
22%
22%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
11%
67%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
1 00%
0%
1 00%
1 00%
Lowest
(ppbv)
1.18
2.42
0.19
2.37
0.30
0.36
0.21
5.49
0.47
0.71
3.07
0.44
0.51
0.36
0.30
0.52
0.21
0.21
0.56
0.90
4.03
1.16
0.16
0.48
0.24
1.95
0.16
0.16
0.61
1.20
1.92
0.80
2.35
1.75
1.29
0.20
0.80
0.92
Highest
(ppbv)
9.23
33.30
1.67
14.96
1.67
1.78
0.82
73.77
3.22
11.11
53.96
2.73
3.23
1.44
6.72
3.02
0.21
0.76
2.60
34.02
20.64
11.93
4.34
1.08
0.24
11.87
0.35
1.01
11.97
13.18
13.27
7.51
11.17
13.66
10.35
0.20
20.15
11.03
Median
(ppbv)
3.23
4.96
0.57
6.51
0.59
0.75
0.21
40.06
0.73
2.07
8.38
1.14
1.49
0.74
1.82
1.50
0.21
0.21
1.11
13.91
8.57
4.40
0.44
0.56
0.24
5.46
0.16
0.16
4.70
3.76
5.14
2.48
3.96
6.21
4.95
0.20
10.36
3.68
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
4.28
8.71
0.66
7.79
0.66
0.76
0.28
37.64
0.99
3.14
16.02
1.31
1.50
0.77
2.14
1.51
0.21
0.27
1.39
13.88
10.18
5.58
0.98
0.63
0.24
5.79
0.18
0.33
5.12
4.92
5.66
3.27
5.85
7.23
5.19
0.20
9.07
4.24
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
3.60
6.39
0.54
6.78
0.57
0.68
0.24
28.06
0.82
2.30
11.10
1.16
1.30
0.71
1.51
1.37
0.21
0.24
1.27
8.65
9.11
4.64
0.58
0.61
0.24
5.11
0.17
0.25
3.86
4.00
4.89
2.69
5.04
6.22
4.34
0.20
6.15
3.31
Standard
Deviation
2.54
9.47
0.45
4.10
0.41
0.43
0.20
23.96
0.85
3.17
16.05
0.69
0.82
0.32
1.91
0.70
0.00
0.18
0.64
10.09
5.09
3.26
1.30
0.18
0.00
2.97
0.07
0.30
3.49
3.53
3.34
2.11
3.44
3.76
3.01
0.00
6.57
3.15
Coefficient
of Variation
1.68
0.92
1.46
1.90
1.59
1.78
1.37
1.57
1.16
0.99
1.00
1.90
1.83
2.37
1.12
2.16
0.00
1.49
2.19
1.38
2.00
1.71
0.75
3.43
NA
1.95
2.69
1.10
1.46
1.39
1.69
1.55
1.70
1.92
1.72
NA
1.38
1.35
                      34 of 35

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SNMOC Monitoring - Appendix D
Number of Frequency
Site Samples Compound Nondetects of Detects
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
SPAZ
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Methylcyclohexane
2,2,3-Trimethylpentane
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane
Toluene
2-Methylheptane
3-Methylheptane
1-Octene
n-Octane
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene/p-Xylene
Styrene
o-Xylene
1-Nonene
n-Nonane
Isopropylbenzene
a-Pinene
n-Propylbenzene
m-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyltoluene
1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
o-Ethyltoluene
b-Pinene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1-Decene
n-Decane
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
m-Diethylbenzene
p-Diethylbenzene
1-Undecene
n-Undecane
1-Dodecene
n-Dodecane
1-Tridecene
n-Tridecane
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
4
8
0
9
0
0
9
2
1
0
4
0
8
2
100%
100%
100%
100%
89%
100%
33%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
56%
100%
100%
44%
100%
100%
100%
100%
56%
11%
100%
0%
100%
100%
0%
78%
89%
100%
56%
100%
11%
78%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.94
0.89
1.12
6.91
0.25
0.26
0.26
0.61
0.93
2.48
1.53
1.83
0.21
0.21
0.26
0.20
0.18
0.89
0.52
0.14
0.21
0.20
2.57
0.20
0.20
1.29
0.21
0.12
0.22
0.77
0.23
0.22
0.23
0.23
Highest
(ppbv)
9.73
8.64
8.01
49.52
2.53
1.89
1.83
3.28
5.79
15.11
2.78
9.17
0.48
2.71
1.67
2.63
1.64
4.48
2.17
2.84
1.32
3.38
21.99
0.20
3.94
37.60
0.21
3.13
1.12
11.28
0.23
5.43
0.98
1.21
Median
(ppbv)
3.63
1.83
3.30
23.23
0.86
0.81
0.26
1.29
2.31
6.64
2.05
3.38
0.21
0.92
0.26
0.20
0.65
1.95
0.99
1.03
0.64
0.20
5.02
0.20
1.58
5.68
0.21
0.27
0.22
1.66
0.23
1.19
0.23
0.23
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
3.96
3.10
3.88
22.98
0.92
0.87
0.43
1.50
2.84
8.22
2.14
4.00
0.27
1.24
0.53
0.70
0.79
2.27
1.19
1.10
0.60
0.55
6.95
0.20
1.55
9.25
0.21
0.69
0.36
2.90
0.23
1.81
0.31
0.42
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
3.22
2.32
3.36
19.42
0.69
0.68
0.32
1.33
2.49
7.18
2.09
3.51
0.25
0.92
0.42
0.42
0.67
2.04
1.09
0.76
0.46
0.27
5.54
0.20
1.17
5.58
0.21
0.37
0.29
1.95
0.23
1.21
0.26
0.32
Standard
Deviation
2.72
2.57
2.10
13.54
0.74
0.60
0.53
0.81
1.51
4.33
0.48
2.35
0.11
0.93
0.46
0.85
0.44
1.11
0.50
0.84
0.43
1.06
6.00
0.00
1.09
11.30
0.00
0.97
0.32
3.33
0.00
1.72
0.25
0.38
Coefficient
of Variation
1.45
1.21
1.85
1.70
1.24
1.45
0.82
1.85
1.87
1.90
4.45
1.70
2.39
1.34
1.15
0.82
1.78
2.05
2.37
1.31
1.39
0.52
1.16
NA
1.41
0.82
NA
0.72
1.14
0.87
0.00
1.05
1.23
1.08
                      35 of 35

-------
               Appendix E




2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E



Site Samples Compound
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
A2TX
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
AZFL
BAPR
BAPR
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
25
25
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
0
1
4
7
13
6
5
21
7
5
4
18
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
19
0
2
0
19
0
2
3
8
20
4
3
52
12
9
5
41
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
100%
96%
86%
75%
54%
79%
82%
25%
75%
82%
86%
36%
100%
100%
100%
100%
73%
100%
100%
14%
100%
91%
100%
14%
100%
97%
96%
88%
70%
94%
96%
22%
82%
87%
93%
39%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.95
0.54
0.469
0.061
0.002
0.057
0.024
0.002
0.013
0.001
0.017
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.01
0.01
Highest
(ppbv)
41.00
1.56
2.42
0.19
0.06
0.20
0.16
0.03
0.04
0.77
4.30
0.05
3.85
1.98
3.02
0.32
0.09
0.26
0.19
0.06
0.07
0.10
0.21
0.01
13.07
2.12
3.00
0.30
0.25
0.91
1.32
0.28
0.08
0.10
0.39
1.10
5.69
1.80
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
2.45
0.88
0.82
0.08
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.00
2.18
1.17
1.13
0.14
0.01
0.15
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.00
3.02
1.11
0.76
0.08
0.00
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.00
1.94
0.77
4.54
0.75
1.01
0.07
0.01
0.07
0.06
0.00
0.02
0.08
0.31
0.01
2.21
1.15
1.28
0.15
0.01
0.16
0.06
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.00
3.13
1.02
0.85
0.09
0.02
0.13
0.08
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.08
0.02
1.82
0.59
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1.93
0.33
0.29
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.00
2.06
1.07
1.14
0.13
0.01
0.15
0.06
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.00
1.60
0.51
0.34
0.04
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.39
0.15
Standard
Deviation
7.68
0.49
0.83
0.07
0.01
0.06
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.15
0.84
0.01
0.82
0.43
0.66
0.07
0.02
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.00
2.08
0.61
0.72
0.07
0.04
0.16
0.17
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.11
0.13
1.58
0.51
Coefficient of
Variation
0.59
1.53
1.23
1.07
0.73
1.03
1.35
0.59
1.29
0.52
0.37
0.61
2.69
2.66
1.93
2.07
0.61
2.67
1.78
0.43
2.35
1.34
1.25
1.13
1.50
1.67
1.18
1.19
0.49
0.82
0.46
0.26
1.08
1.35
0.71
0.17
1.15
1.16
                        1 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E

Site
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BAPR
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
BUND
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
C2IA
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ


Samples Compound
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
145
68
68
68
68
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
1
3
13
2
1
14
3
1
0
14
0
0
1
9
35
9
1
75
34
10
9
67
0
0
2
9
48
5
2
68
23
3
1
96
0
0
0
9
Frequency
of Detects
96%
88%
48%
92%
96%
44%
88%
96%
100%
44%
100%
100%
99%
89%
59%
89%
99%
12%
60%
88%
89%
21%
100%
100%
99%
94%
67%
97%
99%
53%
84%
98%
99%
34%
100%
100%
100%
87%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.01
0.00
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.00
0.003
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
2.44
0.14
0.06
0.53
0.07
0.02
0.04
0.07
0.16
0.05
3.18
1.70
2.94
0.09
0.19
0.21
0.07
0.10
0.04
0.21
1.91
0.04
8.49
12.10
5.40
0.76
0.16
1.00
0.24
1.04
0.29
0.19
1.27
0.08
13.86
3.62
4.81
0.18
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.59
0.05
0.00
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.87
0.46
1.36
0.03
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.00
1.36
1.07
1.17
0.04
0.00
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.00
1.87
0.73
1.17
0.06
0.64
0.04
0.00
0.09
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
1.15
0.54
1.39
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.14
0.01
1.69
1.27
1.38
0.05
0.01
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.19
0.01
2.40
0.99
1.28
0.06
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.12
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.86
0.44
1.02
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.93
0.63
0.69
0.03
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.00
1.19
0.52
0.69
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.71
0.04
0.01
0.12
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.72
0.28
0.67
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.24
0.01
1.35
1.31
0.98
0.08
0.03
0.13
0.03
0.11
0.04
0.03
0.27
0.01
2.36
0.88
0.89
0.04
Coefficient of
Variation
0.90
0.99
0.37
0.73
1.16
0.68
1.00
1.03
0.70
0.45
1.59
1.92
2.08
1.53
0.52
1.07
1.15
0.35
1.04
0.74
0.59
0.59
1.25
0.97
1.40
0.72
0.54
0.83
0.92
0.36
0.65
1.00
0.72
0.54
1.02
1.13
1.43
1.28
                        2 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E



Site Samples Compound
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CLIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
77
77
77
77
77
77
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
10
7
4
57
20
4
1
38
0
1
1
2
18
2
1
39
12
5
0
34
0
1
0
3
30
5
0
20
20
0
0
20
0
1
1
1
20
1
Frequency
of Detects
85%
90%
94%
16%
71%
94%
99%
44%
100%
98%
98%
96%
60%
96%
98%
13%
73%
89%
100%
24%
100%
97%
100%
92%
21%
87%
100%
47%
47%
100%
100%
47%
100%
99%
99%
99%
74%
99%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.00
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
0.20
0.81
0.64
0.18
0.09
0.20
0.95
0.10
8.23
2.54
2.58
0.17
0.50
0.20
0.07
0.00
0.17
0.07
0.69
0.04
7.45
2.79
1.90
0.12
0.06
0.45
0.14
0.16
0.04
0.15
1.64
0.09
6.80
10.80
2.68
0.62
0.34
1.60
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.00
3.36
0.98
1.19
0.06
0.00
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.00
1.59
0.67
1.07
0.03
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.19
0.00
1.53
1.23
1.25
0.11
0.01
0.11
0.03
0.07
0.07
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.16
0.01
3.39
1.08
1.14
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.11
0.00
1.84
0.75
1.04
0.04
0.00
0.06
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.25
0.01
1.88
1.83
1.27
0.13
0.03
0.15
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.00
1.72
0.56
0.57
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.96
0.40
0.59
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.10
0.00
1.21
0.96
0.80
0.09
0.01
0.09
Standard
Deviation
0.04
0.10
0.14
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.26
0.02
2.05
0.67
0.58
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.15
0.01
1.45
0.54
0.50
0.03
0.01
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.30
0.02
1.36
1.76
0.62
0.11
0.06
0.19
Coefficient of
Variation
0.69
0.70
0.51
0.26
0.86
0.98
0.62
0.50
1.66
1.61
1.95
1.39
0.37
1.27
1.51
ND
0.62
1.25
0.72
0.59
1.27
1.38
2.08
1.17
0.38
0.76
1.37
0.41
0.73
1.09
0.84
0.50
1.38
1.04
2.03
1.19
0.54
0.78
                        3 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E

Site
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
CRIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DAIA
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DECO
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI


Samples Compound
77
77
77
77
77
77
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
311
311
311
311
311
311
311
311
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
1
6
1
3
1
67
0
0
0
5
12
1
2
34
18
2
0
27
0
0
0
0
7
0
1
70
0
1
0
46
0
0
0
12
43
4
4
201
Frequency
of Detects
99%
92%
99%
96%
99%
13%
100%
100%
100%
88%
72%
98%
95%
21%
58%
95%
100%
37%
100%
100%
100%
100%
91%
100%
99%
13%
100%
99%
100%
43%
100%
100%
100%
96%
86%
99%
99%
35%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
0.20
0.84
0.22
0.17
0.31
0.02
5.10
1.86
1.91
0.29
0.13
0.29
0.34
0.07
0.08
0.25
1.60
0.06
15.45
4.75
9.24
0.44
0.17
0.42
0.23
0.31
0.45
0.27
1.30
0.06
10.49
4.41
5.77
0.66
0.31
0.80
0.42
0.41
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.00
1.51
0.77
1.07
0.04
0.01
0.06
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.00
5.75
2.03
2.94
0.17
0.05
0.16
0.09
0.00
0.08
0.09
0.31
0.00
2.49
1.11
1.18
0.12
0.01
0.17
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.00
1.68
0.73
1.02
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.20
0.01
5.79
2.20
3.10
0.19
0.06
0.15
0.10
0.01
0.08
0.10
0.36
0.01
2.58
1.29
1.52
0.15
0.03
0.21
0.05
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.91
0.48
0.64
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.00
4.82
1.85
2.53
0.16
0.03
0.13
0.08
0.00
0.07
0.08
0.26
0.00
1.40
0.68
0.73
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
Standard
Deviation
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.00
1.14
0.38
0.51
0.05
0.03
0.07
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.31
0.02
2.11
0.83
1.27
0.09
0.05
0.07
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.25
0.01
1.64
0.99
1.29
0.13
0.05
0.18
0.04
0.07
Coefficient of
Variation
0.92
0.53
1.30
0.96
1.21
1.21
1.47
1.91
2.02
0.87
0.67
1.04
0.91
0.38
0.79
1.03
0.65
0.59
2.75
2.64
2.43
2.04
1.23
2.32
2.28
0.20
1.59
1.82
1.46
0.69
1.57
1.30
1.17
1.19
0.54
1.20
1.32
0.38
                        4 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E

Site
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DMIA
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
DNFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL
ELFL


Samples Compound
311
311
311
311
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
151
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
62
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Number of
Nondetects
7
15
3
178
0
0
0
1
13
0
0
31
10
0
0
19
0
11
15
24
69
18
7
129
34
21
27
105
0
6
7
10
29
9
5
47
14
12
Frequency
of Detects
98%
95%
99%
43%
100%
100%
100%
98%
68%
100%
100%
23%
75%
100%
100%
53%
100%
93%
90%
84%
54%
88%
95%
15%
77%
86%
82%
30%
100%
90%
89%
84%
53%
85%
92%
24%
77%
81%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
0.38
0.59
0.72
0.77
24.84
4.79
6.68
0.63
0.14
0.76
0.35
0.01
0.54
0.51
1.77
0.05
59.32
5.30
3.56
0.46
0.53
0.65
1.02
0.07
0.86
3.09
3.20
0.06
6.13
1.52
2.13
0.26
0.11
0.61
0.10
0.11
0.06
0.23
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.03
0.06
0.00
2.80
0.46
1.10
0.05
0.00
0.07
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.18
0.00
2.45
0.91
0.54
0.05
0.00
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.00
2.10
0.78
0.52
0.06
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.14
0.01
6.84
1.43
1.93
0.11
0.02
0.20
0.09
0.00
0.12
0.09
0.41
0.01
5.32
0.99
0.66
0.07
0.02
0.11
0.07
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.15
0.01
2.17
0.73
0.65
0.06
0.01
0.08
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.03
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.43
0.58
0.04
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.00
2.42
0.55
0.31
0.04
0.00
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.00
1.47
0.36
0.26
0.03
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.01
Standard Coefficient of
Deviation
0.07
0.05
0.17
0.05
7.26
1.59
1.91
0.14
0.04
0.22
0.10
0.00
0.18
0.10
0.52
0.01
10.46
0.78
0.55
0.07
0.06
0.13
0.14
0.01
0.12
0.32
0.45
0.01
1.14
0.44
0.54
0.06
0.02
0.09
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.04
Variation
0.98
0.96
0.83
0.25
0.94
0.90
1.01
0.81
0.63
0.90
0.89
1.71
0.64
0.84
0.79
0.70
0.51
1.27
1.21
1.00
0.40
0.85
0.47
0.45
0.31
0.26
0.33
0.59
1.90
1.65
1.20
1.16
0.50
0.88
1.46
0.35
1.06
0.85
                        5 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E

Site
ELFL
ELFL
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
EPTX
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO


Samples Compound
62
62
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
67
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
6
50
0
1
1
2
18
0
0
58
11
1
5
45
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
37
1
0
4
17
0
0
0
4
13
0
0
79
0
3
4
62
Frequency
of Detects
90%
19%
100%
99%
99%
97%
73%
100%
100%
13%
84%
99%
93%
33%
100%
100%
100%
100%
86%
100%
100%
12%
98%
100%
90%
60%
100%
100%
100%
96%
87%
100%
100%
23%
100%
97%
96%
40%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.001
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
2.54
0.47
1.448
0.003
0.002
0.038
0.027
0.002
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
0.35
0.06
5.75
2.84
2.41
0.33
0.19
0.19
0.14
0.33
0.11
0.13
0.92
0.09
3.30
2.37
2.88
0.23
0.22
0.31
0.12
0.20
0.07
0.12
0.40
0.04
14.00
2.55
18.65
0.57
0.28
0.37
0.26
0.31
1.09
0.41
1.38
0.07
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.00
2.01
0.99
1.11
0.08
0.01
0.08
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.00
1.31
0.74
0.99
0.13
0.03
0.09
0.07
0.00
0.03
0.06
0.06
0.01
5.86
1.39
2.87
0.13
0.02
0.21
0.08
0.00
0.06
0.07
0.14
0.00
0.05
0.00
2.42
1.11
1.12
0.10
0.03
0.09
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.18
0.01
1.31
0.74
1.19
0.11
0.05
0.10
0.06
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.13
0.01
6.36
1.49
4.12
0.15
0.05
0.21
0.10
0.01
0.09
0.10
0.35
0.01
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.02
0.00
1.75
0.76
0.78
0.07
0.01
0.07
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.93
0.50
0.60
0.08
0.02
0.08
0.05
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.00
5.97
1.41
3.43
0.11
0.02
0.20
0.09
0.00
0.06
0.08
0.19
0.01
Standard
Deviation
0.07
0.01
1.45
0.68
0.59
0.08
0.04
0.05
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.25
0.02
0.69
0.47
0.95
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.13
0.01
2.37
0.50
3.37
0.10
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.11
0.08
0.33
0.02
Coefficient of
Variation
0.75
0.38
1.67
1.64
1.89
1.27
0.73
1.91
1.52
0.26
0.99
1.47
0.71
0.48
1.89
1.57
1.26
1.90
0.94
1.76
2.06
0.19
1.78
1.90
1.00
0.99
2.68
3.00
1.22
1.50
0.81
3.59
2.00
0.27
0.77
1.28
1.06
0.72
                        6 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E



Site Samples Compound
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GAFL
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
GPMS
JAMS
JAMS
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
16
16
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
0
3
3
8
34
8
1
73
25
15
15
63
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
41
0
0
1
30
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
13
0
0
0
12
0
0
Frequency
of Detects
100%
97%
97%
91%
62%
91%
99%
19%
72%
83%
83%
30%
100%
100%
100%
100%
86%
100%
100%
20%
100%
100%
98%
41%
100%
100%
100%
100%
69%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
8%
100%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
2.52
0.74
0.271
0.061
0.001
0.056
0.027
0.001
0.010
0.020
0.028
0.002
0.01
0.01
Highest
(ppbv)
7.81
2.57
2.85
0.44
0.06
0.43
0.61
0.15
0.06
0.27
0.39
0.05
13.12
3.68
10.10
0.96
0.27
0.49
0.40
0.39
0.30
0.22
1.42
0.16
6.49
1.68
1.97
0.16
0.26
0.20
0.08
0.00
0.07
0.08
0.36
0.00
9.74
1.79
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
2.90
0.94
0.69
0.07
0.00
0.06
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.00
6.08
1.52
4.96
0.14
0.03
0.21
0.16
0.00
0.09
0.08
0.33
0.00
4.11
1.15
1.04
0.09
0.00
0.11
0.06
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.00
3.64
1.37
2.88
0.95
0.74
0.09
0.01
0.09
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.01
6.43
1.64
5.01
0.17
0.06
0.23
0.18
0.02
0.11
0.10
0.47
0.02
4.41
1.23
0.99
0.10
0.03
0.12
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.10
0.00
3.73
1.11
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1.75
0.53
0.37
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
4.95
1.32
4.04
0.13
0.03
0.19
0.15
0.00
0.07
0.08
0.25
0.01
4.23
1.20
0.80
0.10
0.01
0.11
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.07
0.00
1.27
0.48
Standard
Deviation
1.51
0.54
0.53
0.09
0.01
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.08
0.01
3.47
0.87
2.23
0.14
0.06
0.12
0.09
0.07
0.09
0.06
0.41
0.03
1.34
0.26
0.61
0.03
0.07
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.11
0.00
2.58
0.58
Coefficient of
Variation
1.91
1.78
1.39
0.99
0.67
0.98
0.72
0.31
1.03
0.87
0.52
0.72
1.85
1.87
2.24
1.19
0.95
1.89
1.90
0.33
1.25
1.69
1.16
0.62
3.28
4.76
1.62
3.32
0.41
3.41
3.37
ND
1.99
2.14
0.97
ND
1.44
1.92
                        7 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E



Site Samples Compound
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
JAMS
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LEFL
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
84
84
84
84
84
84
84
84
84
84
84
84
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
38
38
38
38
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
2
0
0
12
0
1
0
13
0
0
0
1
35
1
0
68
11
8
10
53
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
15
1
1
0
13
0
0
0
2
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
88%
100%
100%
25%
100%
94%
100%
19%
100%
100%
100%
99%
58%
99%
100%
19%
87%
90%
88%
37%
100%
100%
100%
100%
62%
100%
100%
29%
95%
95%
100%
38%
100%
100%
100%
95%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.04
0.09
0.119
0.005
0.002
0.047
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.005
0.002
0.01
0.00
0.003
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
2.31
0.18
0.45
0.44
0.13
0.11
0.06
0.13
0.21
0.00
4.63
1.56
2.05
0.20
0.33
0.26
0.09
0.24
0.05
0.14
0.45
0.06
3.88
1.63
3.22
0.30
0.17
0.31
0.12
0.04
0.06
0.12
0.15
0.03
6.98
19.62
1.95
0.16
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
1.07
0.11
0.01
0.15
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.00
2.30
0.86
0.50
0.07
0.00
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.00
2.47
1.24
1.42
0.13
0.01
0.15
0.06
0.00
0.03
0.05
0.04
0.00
1.74
1.02
0.81
0.05
1.04
0.10
0.05
0.15
0.04
0.01
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.00
2.43
0.90
0.66
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.09
0.01
2.46
1.13
1.57
0.14
0.02
0.14
0.06
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.00
2.20
2.03
0.78
0.06
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.37
0.06
0.01
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.00
1.97
0.77
0.47
0.06
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
2.02
1.00
1.33
0.11
0.01
0.13
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.00
1.36
0.88
0.45
0.03
Standard
Deviation
0.76
0.06
0.13
0.11
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.06
0.00
1.00
0.32
0.48
0.05
0.07
0.06
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.12
0.01
0.95
0.40
0.79
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.01
1.69
3.26
0.44
0.04
Coefficient of
Variation
1.37
1.75
0.43
1.31
1.36
0.31
1.58
1.26
0.96
ND
2.43
2.85
1.37
1.74
0.42
1.40
2.21
0.27
1.52
1.52
0.74
0.66
2.60
2.79
2.00
1.97
0.45
2.50
2.19
0.62
1.97
1.81
1.33
0.63
1.30
0.62
1.76
1.33
                        8 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E



Site Samples Compound
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
MUIA
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
PGMS
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
87
87
87
87
87
87
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
7
2
0
13
9
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
9
0
1
28
0
1
0
33
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
13
0
1
0
14
0
4
4
14
42
11
Frequency
of Detects
82%
95%
100%
66%
76%
100%
100%
61%
100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
100%
98%
39%
100%
98%
100%
28%
100%
100%
100%
100%
76%
100%
100%
24%
100%
94%
100%
18%
100%
95%
95%
84%
52%
87%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.00
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
Highest
(ppbv)
0.21
1.29
0.20
2.96
0.60
0.55
1.83
0.04
16.46
4.31
4.01
0.43
0.24
0.38
0.18
0.15
0.19
0.32
1.17
0.09
6.95
2.16
2.82
0.23
0.09
0.21
0.08
0.08
0.20
0.11
0.53
0.03
42.94
2.44
6.50
0.24
0.15
0.59
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.01
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.16
0.00
3.84
1.71
1.38
0.23
0.01
0.19
0.04
0.00
0.09
0.04
0.07
0.00
3.68
1.26
0.81
0.11
0.01
0.13
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.00
2.83
0.85
0.54
0.06
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.18
0.05
0.29
0.07
0.06
0.25
0.01
5.08
1.75
1.58
0.19
0.03
0.19
0.05
0.01
0.09
0.05
0.23
0.01
3.82
1.20
0.95
0.11
0.02
0.12
0.05
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.11
0.00
3.99
0.93
0.84
0.06
0.02
0.09
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.10
0.00
2.52
1.04
0.92
0.13
0.01
0.13
0.03
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.00
1.92
0.68
0.42
0.07
0.01
0.08
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.00
2.14
0.55
0.37
0.03
0.00
0.04
Standard
Deviation
0.04
0.31
0.04
0.60
0.12
0.09
0.34
0.01
3.94
1.02
0.95
0.11
0.05
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.29
0.02
1.92
0.55
0.80
0.06
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.17
0.01
6.21
0.58
1.03
0.06
0.03
0.10
Coefficient of
Variation
0.66
0.57
1.25
0.49
0.55
0.65
0.73
0.90
1.29
1.72
1.66
1.80
0.63
2.06
1.22
0.49
1.61
0.90
0.78
0.47
1.99
2.17
1.18
1.84
0.65
2.25
2.02
0.40
0.87
1.36
0.68
0.55
0.64
1.60
0.82
1.16
0.50
0.90
                        9 of 11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E



Site Samples Compound
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
SIFL
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SJPR
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLCU
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
87
87
87
87
87
87
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
4
71
23
15
15
67
0
2
3
5
10
5
2
12
6
4
4
13
0
0
0
1
6
0
0
62
3
2
8
32
0
0
2
3
6
1
0
25
Frequency
of Detects
95%
18%
74%
83%
83%
23%
100%
91%
87%
78%
57%
78%
91%
48%
74%
83%
83%
43%
100%
100%
100%
99%
92%
100%
100%
21%
96%
97%
90%
59%
100%
100%
96%
94%
87%
98%
100%
47%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.006
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.004
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
1.10
0.09
0.14
2.02
1.47
0.06
10.55
3.02
2.30
0.36
0.05
0.62
0.20
0.06
0.06
0.32
0.32
0.00
59.59
5.79
6.27
0.51
0.15
0.56
0.47
0.11
0.44
0.73
1.63
0.07
50.63
5.02
12.30
0.50
0.45
0.56
0.91
0.08
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.00
2.07
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.37
1.29
2.36
0.12
0.03
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.14
0.00
17.90
1.73
1.16
0.14
0.00
0.23
0.13
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.08
0.09
0.01
2.30
0.82
0.43
0.07
0.00
0.10
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.00
5.28
1.54
2.57
0.15
0.04
0.12
0.09
0.01
0.05
0.08
0.29
0.01
18.60
1.71
1.45
0.13
0.02
0.26
0.19
0.01
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.35
0.10
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
2.56
0.92
1.42
0.08
0.02
0.07
0.06
0.00
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.01
3.22
0.47
0.27
0.05
0.00
0.09
0.06
0.00
Standard Coefficient of
Deviation
0.15
0.02
0.02
0.28
0.24
0.01
2.67
1.06
0.67
0.11
0.01
0.16
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.07
0.07
0.00
7.42
1.01
1.45
0.12
0.03
0.10
0.07
0.02
0.07
0.09
0.33
0.02
15.76
1.40
1.95
0.12
0.08
0.20
0.23
0.02
Variation
0.41
0.40
0.75
0.29
0.40
0.53
0.86
0.77
0.64
0.65
0.44
0.62
0.75
0.47
0.76
0.61
0.38

0.71
1.53
1.77
1.21
1.16
1.23
1.28
0.34
0.74
0.93
0.89
0.81
1.18
1.22
0.74
1.14
0.31
1.31
0.81
0.59
                        10of11

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Carbonyl Monitoring - Appendix E



Site Samples Compound
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
TUMS
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
47
47
47
47
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Butyr/lsobutyraldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehydes
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Number of
Nondetects
2
1
0
24
0
4
4
14
39
10
4
72
19
14
3
74
0
0
0
0
6
0
1
28
1
1
0
31
Frequency
of Detects
96%
98%
100%
49%
100%
95%
95%
84%
55%
89%
95%
17%
78%
84%
97%
15%
100%
100%
100%
100%
85%
100%
98%
32%
98%
98%
100%
24%
Lowest
(ppbv)
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.01
0.00
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
Highest
(ppbv)
0.81
3.53
2.67
0.15
42.94
2.13
6.50
0.30
0.32
0.59
1.10
0.09
0.20
2.02
1.47
0.13
4.99
2.22
3.19
0.30
0.22
0.59
0.22
0.05
0.19
0.41
0.25
0.10
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) Mean (ppbv)
0.12
0.09
0.37
0.00
3.08
0.89
0.56
0.06
0.00
0.08
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
2.79
0.95
0.87
0.10
0.01
0.14
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.18
0.29
0.65
0.01
4.37
0.89
0.87
0.06
0.02
0.10
0.06
0.00
0.02
0.08
0.11
0.00
2.62
1.01
1.02
0.12
0.03
0.14
0.06
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.01
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
0.04
0.04
0.13
0.00
1.95
0.46
0.32
0.03
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
1.50
0.62
0.54
0.08
0.01
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.00
Standard
Deviation
0.21
0.73
0.70
0.03
6.33
0.53
1.09
0.06
0.05
0.11
0.15
0.01
0.04
0.28
0.24
0.01
1.30
0.51
0.74
0.08
0.05
0.10
0.04
0.01
0.03
0.07
0.05
0.02
Coefficient of
Variation
0.89
0.39
0.93
0.46
0.69
1.69
0.80
1.12
0.35
0.93
0.40
0.35
0.62
0.28
0.48
0.31
2.02
1.97
1.38
1.58
0.58
1.46
1.31
0.55
1.06
0.75
1.07
0.41
                       11 of 11

-------
              Appendix F




2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
Number of
Nondetects
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
72
83
83
83
83
83
0
83
83
83
83
81
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
0
83
83
83
83
83
83
0
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Lowest
(ppbv)
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
7.73
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
Highest
(ppbv)
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
27.58
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
35.66
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
190.80
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
85.92
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
12.84
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
63.99
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
31.03
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.90
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
13.40
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
75.81
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
35.08
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.68
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
10.73
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
64.44
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
30.11
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
42.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.29
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.95
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.50
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.92
                      1 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Number of
Nondetects
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
64
83
83
10
83
83
5
83
83
80
83
83
83
2
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
3
83
81
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
0%
88%
0%
0%
94%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
98%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
96%
0%
2%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
Highest
(ppbv)
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
6.25
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
21.34
6.84
8.53
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.99
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
6.14
6.84
8.53
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.96
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.76
6.84
8.53
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.90
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
6.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.12
NA
0.00
                      2 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
APMI
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Number of
Nondetects
83
51
83
83
71
75
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
76
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
83
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
27
33
33
32
33
33
0
33
33
32
Frequency
of Detects
0%
39%
0%
0%
14%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3%
Lowest
(ppbv)
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
15.64
4.07
4.72
5.48
Highest
(ppbv)
6.27
39.83
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
29.47
8.53
5.83
32.80
4.99
6.02
154.45
4.07
4.72
33.25
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
52.85
4.07
4.72
5.48
6.27
10.49
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
12.54
8.53
5.83
8.85
4.99
6.02
59.71
4.07
4.72
6.32
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
6.27
8.84
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
12.10
8.53
5.83
8.45
4.99
6.02
52.84
4.07
4.72
5.79
Standard
Deviation
0.00
8.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.27
0.00
0.00
4.30
0.00
0.00
29.83
0.00
0.00
4.83
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
1.28
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.94
NA
NA
2.06
NA
NA
2.00
NA
NA
1.31
                      3 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Number of
Nondetects
33
32
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
0
33
33
33
33
33
33
1
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
21
33
33
33
26
33
33
1
33
Frequency
of Detects
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
97%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
36%
0%
0%
0%
21%
0%
0%
97%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
23.31
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
Highest
(ppbv)
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
27.53
118.06
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
38.03
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
25.27
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
47.91
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
18.50
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
7.44
50.09
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
17.62
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
7.79
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
7.11
46.14
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
15.18
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
6.26
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.61
21.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.06
2.30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.99
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.19
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                      4 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Number of
Nondetects
33
1
33
33
18
33
33
33
1
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
0
33
33
33
10
33
33
20
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
29
33
33
33
Frequency
of Detects
0%
97%
0%
0%
45%
0%
0%
0%
97%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
70%
0%
0%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
Highest
(ppbv)
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
69.73
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
10.72
6.84
8.53
6.27
37.19
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
14.61
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
13.04
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.31
6.84
8.53
6.27
15.40
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
7.65
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.26
6.84
8.53
6.27
12.93
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.80
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.47
NA
NA
NA
1.70
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
                      5 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CANJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Number of
Nondetects
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
28
30
30
30
30
30
3
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
90%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
93%
Lowest
(ppbv)
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
7.73
Highest
(ppbv)
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
31.07
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
36.23
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
7.73
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
8.00
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
10.83
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
6.75
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
9.43
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.59
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.27
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.43
                      6 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Number of
Nondetects
30
30
30
30
30
30
2
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
22
30
30
30
30
30
30
12
30
30
7
30
30
29
30
30
30
7
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
93%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
77%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
77%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
Highest
(ppbv)
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
16.77
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
23.68
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
11.98
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
6.27
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
6.25
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.88
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
6.04
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
5.50
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.75
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.71
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.43
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
2.54
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                      7 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
CHNJ
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Number of
Nondetects
30
30
30
30
15
30
30
30
16
30
30
28
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
29
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
26
40
40
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
47%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
35%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
Highest
(ppbv)
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
46.57
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
70.12
8.53
5.83
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
12.47
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
17.55
8.53
5.83
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
10.09
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
14.88
8.53
5.83
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.95
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
1.24
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.36
NA
NA
                      8 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
Samples
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Compound
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
Number of
Nondetects
40
40
40
4
40
39
40
40
37
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
3
40
40
40
40
40
40
3
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
90%
0%
3%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
93%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
93%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
7.73
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
Highest
(ppbv)
8.10
4.99
6.02
59.67
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
10.01
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
1989.79
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
98.14
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
Median
(ppbv)
8.10
4.99
6.02
13.48
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
66.97
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
38.62
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
8.10
4.99
6.02
17.10
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
4.00
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
129.62
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
44.00
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
8.10
4.99
6.02
12.27
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.94
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
70.20
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
36.87
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
306.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
1.11
NA
0.00
NA
NA
4.10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.42
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.91
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                      9 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Number of
Nondetects
40
40
24
40
40
3
40
40
3
40
40
33
40
40
40
5
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
3
40
34
40
9
40
40
20
28
40
40
40
40
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
93%
0%
0%
93%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
88%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
93%
0%
15%
0%
78%
0%
0%
50%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
Highest
(ppbv)
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
29.92
4.86
5.11
25.00
4.87
2.71
22.28
4.83
5.20
3.40
23.22
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
50.95
6.84
8.53
6.27
206.27
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
21.02
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
6.91
4.86
5.11
6.48
4.87
2.71
4.49
4.83
5.20
3.40
6.11
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
10.59
6.84
8.53
6.27
45.11
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
5.07
4.86
5.11
5.57
4.87
2.71
4.05
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.54
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
8.03
6.84
8.53
6.27
24.91
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.72
0.00
0.00
5.06
0.00
0.00
3.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
50.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
1.03
NA
NA
1.28
NA
NA
1.38
NA
NA
NA
1.50
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.99
NA
0.00
NA
0.90
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     10 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
DEMI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
Number of
Nondetects
40
40
40
31
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
16
20
20
20
20
20
0
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
Highest
(ppbv)
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
23.77
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
167.46
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
39.48
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.87
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
47.33
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.67
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
35.92
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
37.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.24
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     11 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
Number of
Nondetects
20
20
20
20
20
20
0
20
20
20
20
20
20
0
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
12
20
20
1
20
20
1
20
20
14
20
20
20
0
20
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
95%
0%
0%
95%
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
27.26
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
13.18
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
Highest
(ppbv)
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
263.94
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
133.17
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
24.78
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
80.76
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
37.36
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
91.14
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
43.35
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
6.69
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
78.77
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
36.92
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
5.00
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
54.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
28.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.66
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.54
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
1.01
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                     12 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
E7MI
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
30
30
30
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Number of
Nondetects
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
0
20
20
20
16
20
20
13
16
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
17
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
30
30
30
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
35%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
Highest
(ppbv)
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
11.87
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
310.51
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.48
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
21.05
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.37
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
7.09
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
68.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.65
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.31
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     13 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Number of
Nondetects
30
30
30
30
28
30
30
30
30
30
0
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
0
30
30
30
30
30
30
0
30
30
30
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
17.19
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
Highest
(ppbv)
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
153.97
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
160.71
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
72.65
5.27
4.18
10.87
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
30.45
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
49.48
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
25.92
5.27
4.18
10.87
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
36.57
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
56.07
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
30.28
5.27
4.18
10.87
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
28.78
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
50.27
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
25.87
5.27
4.18
10.87
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
28.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
28.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.28
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.96
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.79
NA
NA
NA
                     14 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Number of
Nondetects
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
20
30
30
0
30
30
0
30
30
5
30
30
30
1
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
1
30
30
30
29
30
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
83%
0%
0%
0%
97%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
97%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
Highest
(ppbv)
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
32.74
4.86
5.11
29.15
4.87
2.71
246.50
4.83
5.20
3.40
29.24
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
58.87
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
29.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
5.37
4.86
5.11
6.00
4.87
2.71
49.42
4.83
5.20
3.40
6.23
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
8.82
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
4.08
4.86
5.11
5.28
4.87
2.71
25.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.60
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
6.74
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.99
0.00
0.00
4.84
0.00
0.00
55.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.90
NA
NA
1.24
NA
NA
0.89
NA
NA
NA
1.35
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.84
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                     15 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
ELNJ
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
Number of
Nondetects
30
15
23
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
26
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
35
40
40
40
40
40
2
40
40
40
40
39
40
Frequency
of Detects
0%
50%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
95%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
Highest
(ppbv)
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
52.37
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
18.49
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
19.52
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
15.87
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.79
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.66
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                     16 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
Number of
Nondetects
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
0
40
40
40
40
40
40
0
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
26
40
40
0
40
40
1
40
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
35%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
98%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
34.12
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
16.23
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
Highest
(ppbv)
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
144.84
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
60.39
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
6.05
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
72.10
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
31.17
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
75.98
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
33.81
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.99
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
71.05
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
31.97
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.97
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.72
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.01
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
6.03
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                     17 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Number of
Nondetects
40
37
40
40
40
1
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
0
40
39
40
18
40
40
27
31
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
34
40
40
40
40
40
40
Frequency
of Detects
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
98%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3%
0%
55%
0%
0%
33%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
Highest
(ppbv)
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
19.61
6.84
8.53
6.27
72.84
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
86.83
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
7.31
6.84
8.53
6.27
17.10
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
7.84
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
6.61
6.84
8.53
6.27
12.58
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
6.22
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.92
NA
0.00
NA
1.11
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.61
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     18 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
LOMI
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
40
40
40
40
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Number of
Nondetects
40
40
40
40
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
25
32
32
32
32
32
3
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
0
32
32
32
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
91%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
7.73
9.05
7.83
6.61
Highest
(ppbv)
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
26.86
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
52.54
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
70.31
9.05
7.83
6.61
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
14.17
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
28.01
9.05
7.83
6.61
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.73
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
18.22
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
31.00
9.05
7.83
6.61
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.55
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
13.39
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
27.22
9.05
7.83
6.61
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.25
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.25
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.93
NA
NA
NA
                     19 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Number of
Nondetects
32
32
32
3
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
19
32
32
32
30
32
32
7
32
32
6
32
32
32
32
32
32
5
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
91%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
41%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
78%
0%
0%
81%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
84%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
Highest
(ppbv)
11.21
8.40
7.04
50.23
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
76.02
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
11.21
8.40
7.04
10.99
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
12.31
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
11.21
8.40
7.04
8.75
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
7.95
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
1.15
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.81
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     20 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
NBNJ
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Number of
Nondetects
32
7
32
32
32
4
32
32
27
31
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
29
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
19
22
22
22
22
22
Frequency
of Detects
0%
78%
0%
0%
0%
88%
0%
0%
16%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
Highest
(ppbv)
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
1 1 1 .66
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
62.10
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
29.26
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
38.40
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
15.63
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
27.95
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
13.43
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
28.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
1.35
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.26
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     21 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
Samples
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Compound
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
Number of
Nondetects
0
22
21
21
22
21
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
0
22
22
22
22
22
22
0
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
17
Frequency
of Detects
100%
0%
5%
5%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
23%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
26.60
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
13.43
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
Highest
(ppbv)
59.86
4.07
12.88
5.48
5.53
15.66
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
552.19
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
104.08
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
Median
(ppbv)
14.88
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
77.80
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
33.17
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
17.63
4.07
5.09
5.48
5.53
4.38
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
115.02
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
39.32
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
14.35
4.07
4.94
5.48
5.53
4.10
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
83.45
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
34.21
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
Standard
Deviation
12.41
0.00
1.74
0.00
0.00
2.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
119.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
1.42
NA
2.93
0.00
NA
1.74
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.96
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.65
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
                     22 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Number of
Nondetects
22
22
0
22
22
1
22
22
20
22
22
22
1
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
1
22
18
22
21
22
22
16
19
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
95%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
95%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
95%
0%
18%
0%
5%
0%
0%
27%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
Highest
(ppbv)
5.03
3.68
17.05
4.86
5.11
12.73
4.87
2.71
11.70
4.83
5.20
3.40
12.67
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
19.53
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.03
3.68
5.34
4.86
5.11
5.58
4.87
2.71
3.97
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.63
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
7.76
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.03
3.68
4.19
4.86
5.11
5.25
4.87
2.71
3.80
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.41
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
6.83
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
4.59
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
1.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
1.16
NA
NA
2.23
NA
NA
2.30
NA
NA
NA
2.75
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.69
NA
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     23 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
RRMI
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
Number of
Nondetects
19
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
31
32
32
32
32
32
32
26
32
32
32
32
32
2
32
32
31
32
32
32
31
32
32
32
32
31
31
32
32
32
Frequency
of Detects
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
94%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
Highest
(ppbv)
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
33.85
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
382.89
4.07
4.72
13.60
5.53
3.84
10.74
32.04
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
24.03
56.90
5.03
8.82
7.01
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
33.65
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
12.59
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
76.57
4.07
4.72
5.74
5.53
3.84
10.74
7.57
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
9.14
12.73
5.03
8.82
7.01
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
12.02
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
42.18
4.07
4.72
5.64
5.53
3.84
10.74
7.12
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.94
11.89
5.03
8.82
7.01
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
98.26
0.00
0.00
1.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.72
8.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.36
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.78
NA
NA
4.00
NA
NA
NA
1.70
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.36
1.58
NA
NA
NA
                     24 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Number of
Nondetects
32
32
32
0
32
32
32
32
32
32
1
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
25
32
32
4
32
32
3
32
32
28
32
32
32
7
32
32
32
32
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
97%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
88%
0%
0%
91%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
78%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
7.27
8.41
6.81
7.73
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
5.68
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
Highest
(ppbv)
7.27
8.41
6.81
307.76
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
129.00
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
7.44
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
7.27
8.41
6.81
64.11
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
23.51
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
7.27
8.41
6.81
86.91
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
31.23
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
3.05
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
7.27
8.41
6.81
71.05
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
23.98
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
3.00
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
61.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
1.42
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.14
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
3.82
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     25 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SLMO
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
21
21
21
21
21
21
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
Number of
Nondetects
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
3
32
30
32
28
32
32
22
24
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
26
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
21
21
21
21
21
21
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
91%
0%
6%
0%
13%
0%
0%
31%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
Highest
(ppbv)
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
12.38
6.84
8.53
6.27
15.64
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
6.11
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.27
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.82
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.18
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.65
NA
0.00
NA
4.76
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     26 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
Number of
Nondetects
21
13
21
21
20
21
21
1
21
19
21
21
19
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
0
21
21
21
21
21
21
0
21
21
21
21
21
21
Frequency
of Detects
0%
38%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
95%
0%
10%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
31.78
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
19.46
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
Highest
(ppbv)
9.74
103.89
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
57.65
4.07
12.08
5.48
5.53
37.15
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
2975.04
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
230.67
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
18.74
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
109.55
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
45.76
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.74
20.85
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
23.87
4.07
5.07
5.48
5.53
5.43
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
324.00
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
59.48
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
9.74
16.05
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
19.32
4.07
4.94
5.48
5.53
4.28
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
155.28
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
47.72
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
Standard
Deviation
0.00
21.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.12
0.00
1.61
0.00
0.00
7.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
631.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
50.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
0.97
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
1.48
NA
3.16
NA
NA
0.75
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.51
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.18
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     27 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Number of
Nondetects
21
21
21
21
21
21
11
21
21
0
21
21
0
21
21
20
21
21
21
0
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
0
21
16
21
20
21
21
10
12
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
48%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
24%
0%
5%
0%
0%
52%
43%
Lowest
(ppbv)
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
Highest
(ppbv)
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
61.28
4.86
5.11
65.54
4.87
2.71
12.32
4.83
5.20
3.40
59.27
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
72.93
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
16.95
10.93
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
10.41
4.86
5.11
10.24
4.87
2.71
4.02
4.83
5.20
3.40
9.89
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
14.21
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.71
5.54
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
5.96
4.86
5.11
7.02
4.87
2.71
3.82
4.83
5.20
3.40
7.20
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
9.43
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.55
5.46
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.42
0.00
0.00
13.72
0.00
0.00
1.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.12
1.23
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.72
NA
NA
0.75
NA
NA
2.11
NA
NA
NA
0.81
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.87
NA
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
NA
3.64
4.48
                     28 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F



Site Samples Compound
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
SWMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Pyridine
Ethyl methanesulfonate
2-Picoline
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl methanesulfonate
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenol
Pentachloroethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
Aniline
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Aniline
Benzyl alcohol
2-Methylphenol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
3&4-Methylphenol
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodipropylamine
o-Toluidine
Hexachloroethane
Number of
Nondetects
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
14
19
19
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
39
26
39
38
39
39
39
10
39
39
39
39
39
3
39
15
39
39
13
39
39
39
39
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
10%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
74%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
92%
0%
62%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
11.24
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
5.43
4.07
4.72
5.48
5.53
3.84
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
Highest
(ppbv)
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
18.56
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
107.04
14.79
12.11
6.91
8.25
9.74
753.47
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
75.74
4.07
180.67
5.48
5.53
418.05
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
Median
Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
13.93
14.79
5.58
6.91
8.25
9.74
101.16
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
18.00
4.07
12.73
5.48
5.53
38.98
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
7.01
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
20.53
14.79
5.74
6.91
8.25
9.74
201.45
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
22.68
4.07
30.45
5.48
5.53
78.54
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
6.48
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
7.52
13.07
16.70
14.79
5.69
6.91
8.25
9.74
74.54
8.53
5.83
8.10
4.99
6.02
16.86
4.07
14.66
5.48
5.53
25.73
10.74
6.78
6.78
2.83
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.79
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
20.63
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
232.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.09
0.00
39.15
0.00
0.00
100.79
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.85
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.00
NA
5.49
NA
NA
NA
0.86
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.25
NA
0.78
NA
NA
0.78
NA
NA
NA
NA
                     29 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site Samples Compound
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
Acetophenone
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
Hexachlorobutadiene
N-Nitrosodibutylamine
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Safrole
2-Methylnaphthalene
1 ,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,5-Trichlorphenol
2-Nitroaniline
Isosafrole
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phthalate
1,3-Dintrobenzene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthylene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Naphthylamine
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
1-Naphthylamine
Diethyl phthalate
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Number of
Nondetects
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
0
39
39
39
39
39
39
0
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
10
39
39
0
39
39
0
39
39
37
39
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
74%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
5%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
62.97
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
18.81
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
2.91
4.86
5.11
4.64
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
Highest
(ppbv)
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
18565.89
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
1289.31
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
24.67
5.03
3.68
516.67
4.86
5.11
514.38
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
1862.05
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
166.19
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
4.44
5.03
3.68
44.55
4.86
5.11
31.29
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
4027.39
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
339.11
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
7.87
5.03
3.68
133.27
4.86
5.11
107.77
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
6.94
12.43
8.66
11.30
5.03
8.82
7.01
7.27
8.41
6.81
1463.52
9.05
7.83
6.61
11.21
8.40
7.04
180.87
5.27
4.18
10.87
3.45
6.15
7.69
9.24
15.01
4.58
4.63
4.69
4.35
6.36
5.03
3.68
46.19
4.86
5.11
38.20
4.87
2.71
3.60
4.83
Standard Coefficient of
Deviation Variation
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4665.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
336.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.15
0.00
0.00
155.44
0.00
0.00
133.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.86
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.01
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.28
NA
NA
0.86
NA
NA
0.81
NA
NA
0.00
NA
                     30 of 32

-------
2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F
Site
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
YFMI
Samples
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
Compound
4-Nitroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
Fluorene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamine
Azobenzene
Phenacetin
Diallate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Aminobiphenyl
Hexachlorobenzene
Pronamide
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Dinoseb
Anthracene
Carbazole
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Benzidine
Isodrin
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Acetylaminofluorene
3-Methylcholanthrene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Number of
Nondetects
39
39
1
38
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
0
39
7
20
7
39
39
3
4
39
39
39
39
39
39
39
31
18
18
39
39
30
30
36
39
39
Frequency
of Detects
0%
0%
97%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
82%
49%
82%
0%
0%
92%
90%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
21%
54%
54%
0%
0%
23%
23%
8%
0%
0%
Lowest
(ppbv)
5.20
3.40
5.00
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
5.15
6.84
8.53
6.27
7.00
7.13
7.12
7.25
5.27
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
Highest
(ppbv)
5.20
3.40
493.50
34.37
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
789.00
6.84
130.55
64.12
103.39
7.13
7.12
272.03
157.65
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
18.09
22.78
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
Median
(ppbv)
5.20
3.40
32.93
5.33
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
44.98
6.84
8.53
6.27
17.92
7.13
7.12
15.24
10.67
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.17
5.28
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
Arithmetic
mean (ppbv)
5.20
3.40
104.29
6.08
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
139.54
6.84
24.60
10.64
25.19
7.13
7.12
37.08
24.31
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.63
5.87
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
Geometric
mean (ppbv)
5.20
3.40
36.47
5.59
5.66
12.69
8.69
8.19
6.92
5.65
4.80
7.06
6.29
7.37
5.19
56.67
6.84
15.72
8.32
18.03
7.13
7.12
19.17
13.57
6.71
6.27
6.27
5.83
5.15
5.15
4.47
5.81
4.41
5.59
6.59
9.52
8.67
11.81
9.08
7.28
7.92
Standard
Deviation
0.00
0.00
130.71
4.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
169.98
0.00
28.30
11.00
22.26
0.00
0.00
50.94
30.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.31
2.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Coefficient of
Variation
NA
NA
0.80
1.31
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.82
NA
0.87
0.97
1.13
NA
NA
0.73
0.80
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
2.00
2.01
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
                     31 of 32

-------
                                  2001 Summary Tables for SVOC Monitoring - Appendix F

                                          Number of  Frequency  Lowest  Highest  Median  Arithmetic   Geometric     Standard  Coefficient of
Site  Samples           Compound           Nondetects  of Detects  (ppbv)   (ppbv)   (ppbv)  mean (ppbv)  mean (ppbv)    Deviation    Variation
YFMI    39   Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                39        0%      7~52    7~527~52      7~527~52         o!oO         NA
                                                              32 of 32

-------
               Appendix G




2001 Summary Tables for Metals Monitoring

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Metal Monitoring - Appendix G
Site
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
GJCO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
G2CO
Samples Compound
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Cobalt
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Cobalt
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Number of
Nondetects
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
23
0
0
2
0
0
35
0
1
Frequency
of Detects
100%
100%
79%
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
36%
100%
100%
94%
100%
100%
3%
100%
97%
Lowest
(ppbv)
254
653
7.50
102
1085
25.0
3479
11681
0.15
922
411
75
781
7.5
94
710
25
3052
15935
0.15
1415
75
Highest
(ppbv)
2546
3429
38.5
310
2584
527
12714
41759
0.15
2261
2931
2231
4826
41.0
1969
126087
3375
756231
188694
1.81
12193
3574
Median Arithmetic
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
1108
1087
7.50
176
1800
267
6484
24827
0.15
1706
1181
752
2672
7.50
353
6154
936
9103
96209
0.15
5903
1366
1150
1240
13.1
192
1816
228
6446
23887
0.15
1603
1384
882
2580
9.60
473
9594
933
30146
88422
0.20
5764
1661
Geometric
Mean (ppbv)
1019
1157
11.2
184
1761
174
6105
22927
0.15
1558
1154
709
2363
8.45
350
4839
637
9784
73408
0.16
4950
1430
Standard Coefficient of
Deviation Variation
559
563
8.57
58
447
141
2332
6881
0.00
378
806
525
994
7.56
397
20500
694
124532
47247
0.28
2807
814
2.06
2.20
1.53
3.31
4.06
1.62
2.76
3.47
NA
4.24
1.72
1.68
2.60
1.27
1.19
0.47
1.34
0.24
1.87
0.71
2.05
2.04
                        Of1

-------
                     Appendix H




2001 Summary Tables for Hexavalent Chromium Monitoring

-------
2001 Summary Tables for Hexavalent Chromium Monitoring - Appendix H
                  Number of  Frequency  Lowest Highest Median  Arithmetic   Geometric  Standard  Coefficient of
Site
APMI
DEMI
LOMI
RRMI
Samples Compound
23
22
22
44
Hexavalent Chromium
Hexavalent Chromium
Hexavalent Chromium
Hexavalent Chromium
Nondetects of Detects
7
6
7
8
70%
73%
68%
82%
(ppbv)
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
(ppbv)
2.45
1.78
3.37
2.50
(ppbv) mean (ppbv)
1.14
0.78
0.43
0.95
0.90
0.76
0.71
0.81
Mean (ppbv)
0.24
0.23
0.16
0.34
Deviation
0.75
0.59
0.88
0.60
Variation
1.19
1.28
0.81
1.35
                                  1 of 1

-------
         Appendix I




2001 VOC Raw Monitoring Data

-------
        Detroit, Ml (Allen Park - APMI) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
APMI 20045
4/19/2001
5/9/2001
L1EH017
ppbv
0.83
0.43
0.58
0.65
0.02 U
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
141.94
0.29
ND
ND
0.17
0.09 U
ND
ND
ND
0.60
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.26
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.02 U
ND
0.08
0.17
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.09
0.03 U
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 20044
5/1/2001
5/9/2001
L1EH018
ppbv
2.04
0.58
0.71
0.60
0.02 U
ND
0.09
0.03 U
ND
63.14
0.32
ND
ND
0.16
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.56
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.62
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.06
ND
ND
0.09
0.07
ND
0.21
0.56
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.29
0.08
0.25
ND
ND
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
APMI 20195
5/13/2001
5/25/2001
L1EX023
ppbv
0.99
0.26
0.56
0.60
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
78.12 D
0.26
ND
ND
0.70
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.23
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.46
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.09
0.25
ND
ND
ND
0.11
0.03 U
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 20413
5/25/2001
6/12/2001
L1FK018
ppbv
0.71
0.23
0.54
0.54
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
24.90
0.26
ND
ND
4.22
0.08
ND
ND
ND
0.78
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.32
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.68
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.08
ND
0.10
0.25
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.13
0.04 U
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 20587
6/6/2001
6/19/2001
L1FR024
ppbv
1.15
0.33
0.55
0.56
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.27
0.10
ND
ND
ND
0.89
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.41
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.74
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.12
0.32
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.15
0.05 U
0.14
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 20976
6/18/2001
6/28/2001
L1F-019
ppbv
0.80
0.31
0.61
0.60
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.42
ND
ND
64.30
0.07
ND
ND
ND
0.98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.46
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.84
ND
ND
0.22
0.10
ND
0.20
0.54
ND
0.13
ND
0.25
0.08
0.26
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
E = Estimated Value
                                                                                                         Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
        Detroit, Ml (Allen Park - APMI) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
APMI 21424
6/30/2001
7/11/2001
L1GK012
ppbv
0.63
0.25
0.60
0.60
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.47
0.38
ND
ND
1,288 D
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.86
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.06 U
0.28
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.54
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.12
0.29
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.13
0.04 U
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 21587
7/12/2001
7/30/2001
L1 C$015
ppbv
0.52
0.22
0.59
0.55
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
6.57
0.32
ND
ND
32.86
0.10
ND
ND
ND
0.51
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.24
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.44
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.06
0.15
ND
ND
ND
0.08
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 21790
7/24/2001
8/10/2001
L1HI015
ppbv
0.48
0.46
0.60
0.80
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11.69
0.49
ND
ND
3333.63 E
0.10
0.10
ND
ND
1.25
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.44
0.08 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.10
ND
ND
ND
0.07
ND
0.13
0.41
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.20
0.09
0.21
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 22043
8/5/2001
8/16/2001
N1HP008
ppbv
2.46
1.83
0.73
0.73
ND
ND
0.16
ND
0.15
ND
0.32
ND
ND
1.00
0.10
ND
ND
ND
0.86
ND
ND
ND
0.07
ND
ND
0.05 U
1.37
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.05
ND
ND
0.11
0.04 U
ND
0.41
1.19
ND
0.07
ND
0.52
0.16
0.50
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
APMI 221 00
8/11/2001
8/16/2001
N1HP009
ppbv
1.04
0.78
0.63
0.69
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
0.10
ND
0.35
ND
ND
0.27
0.09
ND
ND
0.07 U
0.40
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.55
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.20
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.07
ND
0.19
0.54
ND
0.06 U
ND
0.23
0.07
0.22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 22363
8/17/2001
8/28/2001
N1H-014
ppbv
1.09
0.67
0.64
0.60
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
0.14
0.07
ND
ND
ND
0.42
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.43
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.81
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.10
0.27
ND
ND
ND
0.12
0.03 U
0.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
E = Estimated Value
                                                                                                         Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
        Detroit, Ml (Allen Park - APMI) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
APMI 22558
8/29/2001
9/13/2001
N1IL016
ppbv
0.67
0.59
0.72
0.72
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.10
0.72
0.69
ND
ND
103.69 D
0.15
ND
ND
ND
0.59
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.44
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.87
ND
ND
0.06 U
0.07
ND
0.16
0.43
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.18
0.05 U
0.18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 22753
9/10/2001
9/21/2001
N1IT023
ppbv
0.75
0.40
0.59
0.87
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.14
ND
0.43
ND
ND
25.66
0.16
ND
ND
ND
0.69
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.40
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.89
ND
ND
0.48
0.16
ND
0.13
0.37
ND
ND
ND
0.16
0.10
0.27
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 23062
9/22/2001
9/29/2001
N1M018
ppbv
2.06
1.02
0.70
0.61
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
ND
0.46
ND
ND
9.17
0.13
ND
ND
ND
1.24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.65
0.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
0.77
ND
ND
ND
0.31
0.08
0.27
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 23250
10/4/2001
10/25/2001
N1JX021
ppbv
0.74
0.30
0.66
0.58
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
0.39
ND
ND
14.75
0.14
ND
ND
ND
0.93
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.32
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.82
ND
ND
0.24
0.24
ND
0.16
0.50
ND
ND
ND
0.17
0.20
0.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 23476
10/16/2001
11/3/2001
N1KB019
ppbv
0.77
0.41
0.64
0.75
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.15
ND
0.33
ND
ND
0.95
0.14
ND
ND
ND
0.54
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.06
0.31
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.72
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
0.09
0.26
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.11
0.09
0.29
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 23608
10/22/2001
11/5/2001
N1KE009
ppbv
2.44
0.83
0.68
0.59
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.33
ND
ND
0.10
0.12
ND
ND
ND
1.03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.68
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.23
ND
ND
0.07
0.32
ND
0.24
0.67
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.29
0.10
0.29
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
E = Estimated Value
                                                                                                         Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
        Detroit, Ml (Allen Park - APMI) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
APMI 23694
10/28/2001
11/6/2001
N1KF007
ppbv
1.11
0.40
0.57
0.57
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
29.32
0.12
ND
ND
ND
0.44
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.79
ND
ND
0.14
ND
ND
0.08
0.23
ND
ND
ND
0.10
0.03 U
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 23979
11/9/2001
11/29/2001
L1KI021
ppbv
1.78
0.74
0.58
0.65
ND
ND
0.09
0.14
ND
2.75
0.29
ND
ND
14.32
0.08
ND
ND
ND
1.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.82
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.23
ND
ND
0.10
ND
ND
0.22
0.60
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.27
0.10
0.28
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 24191
11/21/2001
12/17/2001
N1LQ008
ppbv
1.05
0.36
0.39
0.38
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.17
ND
ND
416.20 D
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.36
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.06
0.18
ND
ND
ND
0.08
0.02 U
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 24390
12/3/2001
12/22/2001
N1LU011
ppbv
2.00
0.82
0.71
0.68
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
1.10
0.33
ND
ND
9.25
0.14
ND
ND
ND
0.66
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.59
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.33
ND
ND
ND
0.06
ND
0.17
0.52
ND
ND
ND
0.21
0.07
0.24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 24706
12/15/2001
1/9/2002
L2AH017
ppbv
1.70
0.63
0.57
0.62
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
1.85
0.28
ND
ND
0.30
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.49
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.86
ND
ND
ND
0.10
ND
0.19
0.53
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.19
0.06 U
0.17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
APMI 24891
12/27/2001
1/20/2002
N2AR004
ppbv
0.82
0.35
0.52
0.52
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
2.41
0.24
ND
ND
232.03 D
0.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.36
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.38
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.08
0.18
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.08
0.03 U
0.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
E = Estimated Value
                                                                                                         Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
Arlington, TX (A2TX) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
A2TX19026D1
1/7/2001
1/16/2001
L1AP012
ppbv
1.26
0.37
0.55
0.56
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.08
0.07 U
ND
ND
0.26
0.77
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.38
0.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.46
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
0.10
0.20
ND
ND
ND
0.09
0.03 U
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19026R1
1/7/2001
1/22/2001
L1AV005
ppbv
1.28
0.39
0.52
0.49
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
0.07
0.08
ND
ND
0.30
0.85
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.38
0.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.42
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
0.07
0.18
ND
ND
ND
0.11
0.03 U
0.09
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19028D1
1/7/2001
1/16/2001
L1AP013
ppbv
1.20
0.39
0.57
0.49
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.25
ND
ND
0.19
0.10
ND
ND
0.26
0.73
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.38
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.43
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
0.08
0.17
ND
ND
ND
0.09
0.04 U
0.07
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19028R1
1/7/2001
1/17/2001
L1AQ013
ppbv
1.27
0.39
0.55
0.57
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.17
0.10
ND
ND
0.26
0.91
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.35
0.11
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.43
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.06
0.15
ND
ND
ND
0.09
0.03 U
0.08
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 19067
1/13/2001
1/17/2001
L1AQ015
ppbv
1.38
0.87
0.53
0.67
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
0.24
ND
ND
0.27
0.11
ND
ND
0.19
0.42
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.56
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.44
ND
ND
0.06
ND
ND
0.09
0.16
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.09
0.02 U
0.08
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19137
1/19/2001
1/30/2001
L1A$012
ppbv
1.72
0.40
0.53
0.53
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
0.21
ND
ND
0.22
0.08
ND
ND
0.26
0.43
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.36
0.11
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.35
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.07
0.19
ND
ND
ND
0.10
0.03 U
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

-------
Arlington, TX (A2TX) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
A2TX 19209
1/31/2001
2/6/2001
L1BE018
ppbv
2.24
0.70
0.55
0.61
ND
ND
0.10
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
0.30
0.06 U
ND
ND
0.61
1.37
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.06
0.49
0.09
0.10 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
1.00
ND
ND
0.06
ND
ND
0.15
0.37
ND
0.08
ND
0.17
0.06 U
0.16
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19304D1
2/12/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































A2TX19306D2
2/12/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































A2TX19415
2/24/2001
3/20/2001
L1CS021
ppbv
0.80
0.40
0.60
0.69
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.27
0.13
ND
ND
0.27
0.52
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.32
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.89
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.08
0.18
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.09
0.03 U
0.09
ND
ND
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 19529
3/8/2001
3/23/2001
L1CV013
ppbv
2.62
0.88
0.61
0.74
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
0.41
0.08
ND
ND
0.70
1.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.78
0.09
0.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.90
ND
ND
0.07
0.04 U
ND
0.18
0.45
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.20
0.07 U
0.17
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19588D1
3/20/2001
3/29/2001
L1CI014
ppbv
3.71
1.26
0.62
0.68
ND
ND
0.16
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
0.44
0.09
ND
ND
1.39
1.68
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.77
0.07 U
0.18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.26
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
0.26
0.64
ND
0.07
ND
0.33
0.09
0.28
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND

-------
Arlington, TX (A2TX) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
A2TX19588R1
3/20/2001
4/13/2001
L1 DM006
ppbv
3.03
1.12
0.70
0.61
ND
ND
0.18
ND
ND
ND
0.40
ND
ND
0.37
0.09
ND
ND
1.48
1.77
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.74
0.08 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.45
ND
ND
0.14
0.05 U
ND
0.25
0.66
ND
0.08
ND
0.32
0.08
0.25
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19590D2
3/20/2001
4/13/2001
L1 DM007
ppbv
3.21
1.13
0.75
0.65
ND
ND
0.17
ND
ND
ND
0.41
ND
ND
0.38
0.10
ND
ND
1.61
1.92
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.77
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.41
ND
ND
0.09
0.05 U
ND
0.25
0.68
ND
0.11
ND
0.33
0.09
0.28
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX19590R2
3/20/2001
4/19/2001
L1DS013
ppbv
3.60
1.29
0.69
0.73
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
ND
0.42
ND
ND
0.48
0.11
ND
ND
1.85
2.23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.74
0.04 U
0.19
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.57
ND
ND
1.25
ND
ND
0.11
0.02 U
ND
0.24
0.69
ND
0.08
ND
0.33
0.10
0.29
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 19475
4/1/2001
4/20/2001
L1DT010
ppbv
1.51
0.77
0.61
0.77
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
0.31
0.10
ND
ND
0.72
1.46
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.59
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.72
ND
ND
0.07
ND
ND
0.14
0.33
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.16
0.06 U
0.17
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 19826
4/13/2001
4/24/2001
L1DX013
ppbv
1.98
0.92
0.59
0.91
ND
ND
0.10
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
0.45
0.11
ND
ND
0.98
0.99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.85
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.15
ND
ND
0.06
0.03
ND
0.21
0.53
ND
0.24
ND
0.27
0.10
0.35
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 19931
4/25/2001
5/8/2001
L1EH005
ppbv
3.09
1.32
0.76
0.73
0.02 U
ND
0.23
ND
ND
ND
0.33
ND
ND
0.40
0.15
ND
ND
2.62
1.29
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.74
0.10
0.17
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.34
ND
ND
1.99
ND
ND
0.14
0.21
ND
0.35
0.90
ND
0.08
ND
0.42
0.15
0.37
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
ND

-------
Arlington, TX (A2TX) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
A2TX 20067
5/7/2001
5/10/2001
L1EI020
ppbv
1.22
0.51
0.63
0.78
0.02 U
ND
0.07
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.31
0.08
ND
ND
0.62
0.88
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.41
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
0.71
ND
ND
0.07
0.07
ND
0.13
0.30
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.14
0.04 U
0.12
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 20250 D1
5/19/2001
6/7/2001
LIFF017
ppbv
1.01
0.50
0.64
1.19
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
0.33
0.10
ND
ND
0.34
1.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.28
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.43
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.08
0.17
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.09
0.03 U
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 20250 R1
5/19/2001
6/12/2001
L1KF020
ppbv
0.76
0.46
0.60
1.07
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
0.33
ND
ND
0.34
0.11
ND
ND
0.33
0.92
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.46
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.53
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.10
0.20
ND
ND
ND
0.11
0.05 U
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 20252 D2
5/19/2001
6/5/2001
L1FD019
ppbv
1.03
0.54
0.64
1.05
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
0.09
0.10
ND
ND
0.39
1.16
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.32
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.44
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
0.08
0.18
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.08
0.03 U
0.07
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 20252 R2
5/19/2001
6/7/2001
L1FF018
ppbv
0.97
0.53
0.64
1.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.11
0.11
ND
ND
0.44
1.62
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.32
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.42
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.02 U
ND
0.07
0.17
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.08
0.03 U
0.08
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX
5/31/2001
Not Sampled
Not Sampled
ppbv



























































-------
Arlington, TX (A2TX) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
A2TX
6/11/2001
Not Sampled
Not Sampled
ppbv


























































A2TX21069
6/24/2001
6/28/2001
L1F-023
ppbv
0.66
0.38
0.59
0.83
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
0.28
0.28
ND
0.42
0.12
ND
ND
0.39
0.99
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.39
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.15
ND
ND
0.50
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.09
0.22
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.11
0.03 U
0.09
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
A2TX 21445
7/6/2001
7/19/2001
L1GR019
ppbv
0.58
0.41
0.56
0.99
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
0.57
ND
0.55
0.09
ND
ND
0.60
0.96
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.42
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.49
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.07
0.18
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.09
0.02 U
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

-------
      Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (BAPR) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BAPR 2041 6
5/31/2001
6/13/2001
L1FL019
ppbv
0.93
0.34
0.68
0.87
0.13
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
9.48
0.11
ND
ND
0.19
0.64
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.32
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.65
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.83
6.22
ND
0.04 U
ND
1.97
0.07
0.23
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 20670
6/12/2001
6/21/2001
L1FT014
ppbv
0.84
0.37
0.65
0.89
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.43
ND
ND
1.57
0.08
ND
ND
0.14 U
1.31
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.32
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.64
ND
ND
0.07
ND
ND
0.90
3.08
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.98
0.07 U
0.23
ND
ND
0.08 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 21025
6/24/2001
6/27/2001
L1FZ014
ppbv
1.10
0.37
0.59
0.89
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
4.91
0.08
ND
ND
0.14 U
1.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.28
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.44
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.63
2.22
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.63
0.05 U
0.18
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 21407
7/6/2001
7/22/2001
L1GV009
ppbv
0.87
0.34
0.61
0.88
0.04 U
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
2.80
0.09
ND
ND
0.16 U
0.55
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.39
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.17
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.65
2.32
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.61
0.05 U
0.16
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 21 644
7/18/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































BAPR 21 81 3
7/30/2001
8/13/2001
L1HM007
ppbv
1.02
0.42
0.72
0.87
0.11
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
0.35
0.35
ND
ND
9.68
0.08
ND
ND
0.13 U
1.23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.22
ND
ND
2.29
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.57
2.18
ND
ND
ND
0.57
0.05 U
0.16
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
      Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (BAPR) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BAPR 22074
8/11/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































BAPR 22384
8/23/2001
9/14/2001
L1IN010
ppbv
1.44
0.87
0.68
0.90
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.34
ND
ND
6.56
0.09
ND
ND
0.13 U
0.56
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.36
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.42
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.67
2.26
ND
ND
ND
0.63
0.12
0.29
ND
ND
0.16
ND
0.21
ND
BAPR
9/4/2001
Not Sampled
Not Sampled
ppbv


























































BAPR 22833 D1
9/16/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































BAPR 22835 D2
9/16/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































BAPR 22985
9/24/2001
10/23/2001
L1JV017
ppbv
1.24
0.31
0.49
0.78
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
49.38
0.24
ND
ND
0.47
0.09
ND
ND
0.15 U
2.14
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.31
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.14 U
ND
ND
4.76
ND
ND
0.07
ND
ND
1.23
3.78
ND
0.06 U
ND
1.39
0.08
0.24
ND
ND
0.08 U
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
      Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (BAPR) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BAPR 231 42
9/28/2001
10/24/2001
L1JX013
ppbv
1.45
0.69
0.56
0.86
ND
ND
0.10
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
2.34
0.13
ND
ND
0.17 U
0.61
ND
ND
ND
0.17
ND
ND
0.07
0.51
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.88
ND
ND
0.36
ND
ND
1.49
4.55
ND
0.08
ND
1.71
0.20
0.41
ND
ND
1.69
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 2331 9
10/10/2001
11/8/2001
L1KG016
ppbv
0.91
0.42
0.59
0.75
0.03 U
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
77.73
0.25
ND
ND
2.25
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.66
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.31
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.05
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
1.21
3.92
ND
0.07
ND
1.41
0.07 U
0.20
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 23545
10/22/2001
11/13/2001
L1KL022
ppbv
0.69
0.25
0.55
0.72
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
91.90
0.26
ND
ND
2.09
0.09
ND
ND
0.07 U
0.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.22
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.61
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
1.18
3.95
ND
0.03 U
ND
1.43
0.04 U
0.13
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 23761 D1
11/3/2001
11/17/2001
L1KP020
ppbv
1.83
0.70
0.60
1.16
ND
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
0.33
ND
ND
5.33
0.10
ND
ND
0.15 U
0.55
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.53
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.08
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
0.56
1.88
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.70
0.11
0.34
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 23761 R1
11/3/2001
11/19/2001
L1KS007
ppbv
1.72
0.67
0.57
1.08
ND
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
4.99
0.09
ND
ND
0.14 U
0.58
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.51
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.88
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
0.51
1.80
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.63
0.10
0.32
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 23763 D2
11/3/2001
11/17/2001
L1KP021
ppbv
1.79
0.66
0.58
1.11
ND
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
0.35
ND
ND
5.11
0.10
ND
ND
0.18 U
0.48
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.54
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.91
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.49
1.75
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.65
0.11
0.33
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
      Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (BAPR) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BAPR 23763 R2
11/3/2001
11/19/2001
L1KS008
ppbv
1.98
0.78
0.65
1.21
ND
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
0.37
ND
ND
5.54
0.11
ND
ND
0.24
2.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.48
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.84
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.47
1.63
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.60
0.09
0.27
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 24001
11/15/2001
11/28/2001
L1KI008
ppbv
0.89
0.36
0.61
0.85
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
11.09
0.40
ND
ND
11.22
0.08
ND
ND
ND
0.35
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.28
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.76
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.87
2.93
ND
0.04 U
ND
1.04
0.06 U
0.17
ND
ND
0.14
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 24098
11/18/2001
11/29/2001
L1KI017
ppbv
1.31
0.49
0.59
1.21
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
2.74
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.45
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.83
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.35
1.24
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.44
0.08
0.22
ND
ND
0.09 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 241 00
11/18/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































BAPR 241 18
11/24/2001
12/4/2001
L1LC016
ppbv
0.92
0.35
0.59
0.78
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
19.17
0.28
ND
ND
0.48
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.33
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.01
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
0.97
3.21
ND
0.04 U
ND
1.15
0.05 U
0.18
ND
ND
0.60
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 24200
11/27/2001
12/4/2001
L1LC021
ppbv
0.75
0.42
0.57
0.66
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
26.94
0.30
ND
ND
0.80
0.08
ND
ND
ND
1.90
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.27
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.94
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
0.81
2.63
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.98
0.04 U
0.14
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
      Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (BAPR) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BAPR 24353
11/30/2001
12/10/2001
L1LJ008
ppbv
1.58
0.44
0.55
0.73
0.02 U
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
27.65
0.28
ND
ND
0.61
0.10
ND
ND
0.07 U
0.54
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.32
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.40
ND
ND
0.07
ND
ND
0.80
2.51
ND
0.06 U
ND
0.97
0.06 U
0.17
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 24451
12/9/2001
1/1/2002
L1L%019
ppbv
3.05
1.16
0.74
1.08
0.22
ND
0.20
ND
ND
115.14
0.27
ND
ND
6.70
0.09
ND
ND
0.13 U
0.78
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.66
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.41
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
1.04
3.55
ND
0.08
ND
1.35
0.14
0.37
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 24790
12/21/2001
1/15/2002
L2AN022
ppbv
1.24
0.30
0.56
0.78
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
45.37
0.26
ND
ND
1.82
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.40
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.64
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.05
3.68
ND
ND
ND
1.32
0.12
0.34
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BAPR 24782
12/27/2001
1/16/2002
L2AP007
ppbv
0.94
0.27
0.53
0.75
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
124.57
0.26
ND
ND
0.79
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.90
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.83
2.81
ND
ND
ND
0.97
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
             Beulah, ND (BUND) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BUND 19012 D1
1/1/2001
1/16/2001
L1AP006
ppbv
0.75
0.23
0.61
0.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.07
0.11
ND
ND
ND
0.78
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.25
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.64
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.07
0.14
ND
ND
ND
0.07
0.02 U
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19012 R1
1/1/2001
1/17/2001
L1AQ006
ppbv
0.84
0.21
0.61
0.43
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
0.09
0.08
ND
ND
ND
0.90
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.27
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.58
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.07
0.13
ND
ND
ND
0.07
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19014 D2
1/1/2001
1/16/2001
L1AP007
ppbv
0.91
0.26
0.65
0.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.15
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.76
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.26
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.72
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.09
0.21
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.08
0.03 U
0.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19014 R2
1/1/2001
1/17/2001
L1AQ007
ppbv
0.99
0.25
0.55
0.51
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
0.12
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.94
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.28
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.77
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.10
0.21
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.11
0.02 U
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19050
1/7/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































BUND 19096
1/13/2001
1/24/2001
L1AW012
ppbv
0.56
0.10
0.48
0.45
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.10
0.09
ND
ND
ND
1.35
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.22
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.16
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
             Beulah, ND (BUND) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BUND 191 59
1/19/2001
1/30/2001
L1A$015
ppbv
4.31
1.10
1.30
0.48
ND
ND
0.21
ND
ND
ND
0.79
ND
ND
0.35
0.09
ND
ND
ND
1.82
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.96
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.55
ND
ND
13.23
ND
ND
0.11
0.16
ND
0.80
2.94
ND
0.18
ND
1.57
0.15
0.39
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 191 62
1/25/2001
1/30/2001
L1A$016
ppbv
0.53
0.10
0.55
0.48
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.12
0.08
ND
ND
ND
1.30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.21
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.14
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.06
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19226
1/31/2001
2/24/2001
L1BW023
ppbv
0.63
0.10
0.56
0.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
0.10
0.09
ND
ND
ND
1.62
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.23
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
0.04
0.05
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.01 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19279
2/6/2001
3/1/2001
L1BI017
ppbv
0.58
0.16
0.52
0.59
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.10
0.09
ND
ND
ND
2.55
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.28
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.17
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.04
0.06
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.02 U
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19341 D1
2/12/2001
3/6/2001
L1CE015
ppbv
0.58
0.10
0.50
0.40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.25
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.08
ND
ND
ND
1.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.19
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.05
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19341 R1
2/12/2001
3/7/2001
L1CF016
ppbv
0.71
0.12
0.59
0.48
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
ND
0.69
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.31
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
             Beulah, ND (BUND) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BUND 1 9343 D2
2/12/2001
3/6/2001
L1CE016
ppbv
0.54
0.11
0.52
0.42
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
ND
ND
0.14
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
1.56
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.26
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.05
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 1 9343 R2
2/12/2001
3/7/2001
L1CF017
ppbv
0.72
0.17
0.49
0.51
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
0.06 U
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
1.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01 U
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 1 9392 D1
2/18/2001
3/17/2001
L1CP015
ppbv
0.51
0.17
0.61
0.58
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.08
0.09
ND
ND
ND
2.36
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.73
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.06
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 1 9392 R1
2/18/2001
3/17/2001
L1CQ006
ppbv
0.64
0.21
0.59
0.57
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
0.07
0.09
ND
ND
ND
2.48
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.78
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.04
0.07
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 1 9394 D2
2/18/2001
3/17/2001
L1CP016
ppbv
0.60
0.17
0.64
0.55
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.54
0.27
0.03 U
ND
0.04 U
0.08
ND
ND
ND
2.02
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.45
0.08 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.07
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 1 9394 R2
2/18/2001
3/17/2001
L1CQ007
ppbv
0.65
0.20
0.58
0.56
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.09
ND
ND
ND
1.98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.46
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.25
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.04
0.07
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.01 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
             Beulah, ND (BUND) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BUND 19440
2/24/2001
3/20/2001
L1CS019
ppbv
0.66
0.15
0.57
0.55
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.10
0.10
ND
ND
ND
2.21
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.23
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.12
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.01 U
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19458
3/2/2001
3/20/2001
L1CU020
ppbv
0.60
0.19
0.55
0.54
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.25
ND
ND
0.09
0.10
ND
ND
ND
2.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.19
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19533
3/8/2001
3/23/2001
L1CV015
ppbv
0.67
0.17
0.56
0.58
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.15
0.07
ND
ND
ND
2.17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.39
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.06
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19577
3/14/2001
3/28/2001
L1C-017
ppbv
0.66
0.18
0.60
0.58
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
0.12
0.10
ND
ND
ND
2.24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.20
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01 U
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01 U
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19604
3/20/2001
4/13/2001
L1DL018
ppbv
1.09
0.32
0.89
0.70
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.25
ND
0.53
ND
ND
0.21
0.08
ND
ND
ND
2.03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.39
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.18
ND
ND
ND
0.09
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19703
3/26/2001
4/20/2001
L1DS023
ppbv
0.51
0.19
0.60
0.65
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.32
ND
ND
0.09
0.12
ND
ND
ND
1.72
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.23
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
             Beulah, ND (BUND) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BUND 19746
4/1/2001
4/20/2001
L1DT009
ppbv
0.51
0.25
0.56
0.61
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.10
0.10
ND
ND
ND
1.73
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.19
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.06 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01 U
ND
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19795
4/7/2001
4/24/2001
L1DW021
ppbv
0.49
0.17
0.60
0.62
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.32
ND
ND
0.14
0.11
ND
ND
ND
1.47
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.20
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01 U
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19832
4/13/2001
4/25/2001
L1DX016
ppbv
0.48
0.15
0.59
0.57
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.18
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19884
4/19/2001
5/5/2001
L1ED017
ppbv
0.50
0.29
0.61
0.55
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.15
0.11
ND
ND
ND
2.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.17
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.12
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.06
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.01 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19954
4/25/2001
5/8/2001
L1EG016
ppbv
0.34
0.21
0.60
0.61
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.30
ND
ND
0.12
0.11
ND
ND
ND
2.21
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
0.25
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.07
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.02 U
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 19999
5/1/2001
VOID
VOID
ppbv


























































U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
             Beulah, ND (BUND) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BUND 20064
5/7/2001
5/10/2001
L1EI015
ppbv
0.38
0.20
0.57
0.55
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.10
0.10
ND
ND
ND
1.91
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.12
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.01 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 20148 D1
5/13/2001
5/23/2001
L1EV021
ppbv
0.30
0.13
0.59
0.55
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.13
0.08
ND
ND
ND
1.23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.11
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.07
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.01 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 20148 R1
5/13/2001
5/24/2001
L1EX007
ppbv
0.29
0.13
0.56
0.58
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28
ND
ND
0.14
0.09
ND
ND
ND
0.98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.11
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 201 50 D2
5/13/2001
5/23/2001
L1EV022
ppbv
0.27
0.16
0.54
0.59
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.27
ND
ND
0.09
0.13
ND
ND
ND
1.18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.12
0.09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.05 U
ND
ND
0.04 U
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.04 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.01 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 201 50 R2
5/13/2001
5/24/2001
L1EX008
ppbv
0.27
0.16
0.53
0.58
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.26
ND
ND
0.09
0.13
ND
ND
ND
0.94
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04 U
0.12
0.08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
ND
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BUND 20293 D1
5/19/2001
6/5/2001
L1FD016

0.33
0.18
0.55
0.57
0.01 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24
ND
ND
0.11
0.08
ND
ND
ND
0.92
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03 U
0.17
0.07 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.05 U
ND
ND
ND
0.02 U
0.01 U
0.02 U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
U = Under Detection Limit
ND = Not Detected
                                                                                                     Appendix i_all new-2.xls

-------
             Beulah, ND (BUND) 2001 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program) Final Data Report
SAMPLE SITE #
SAMPLE DATE
ANALYSIS DATE
FILE NAME
UNITS
ACETYLENE
PROPYLENE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
1,3-BUTADIENE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
ACETONITRILE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ACRYLONITRILE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRICHLOROTRIFLUOROETHANE
trans - 1,2 - DICHLOROETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROPRENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
ETHYL tert-BUTYL ETHER
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
tert-AMYL METHYL ETHER
1,2 - DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
cis -1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
trans - 1,3 - DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE
N-OCTANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
m,p-XYLENE
BROMOFORM
STYRENE
1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE
o-XYLENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
m - DICHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROMETHYLBENZENE
p - DICHLOROBENZENE
o - DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1.3-BUTADIENE
BUND 20293