UNITED STATES EN V i cONi4c N < -•>.,
                            VV A 3 H! N G i O N C .'J  2046 "
         16,  1987

Honorable Lee M. Thomas                        SAB-BC-87-019
Administrator
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency                            ^    -•••• ^--
401 M Street, S. W.                                              '": *^''••'••--
Washington, D, C.  20460

Dear Mr. Thomas s

     The Science Advisory Board has conducted a series of scientific reviews
of Agency research programs that have proven to be a highly useful means of
assessing the quality and relevance of existing research, identifying
research needs and involving the scientific community in the research
planning process.  Such reviews have also aided internal corouni cation
within the Office of Research and Development (OBD) and between ORD and the
program offices.

     The specific research programs SAB has reviewed since January 1936
include the following;

     «  Dioxins

     •  B i ©technology

     *  Extrapolation Modeling

     •  Water Quality

     •  Ecological Risk Assessment

     •  Alternative Hazardous Waste Control Technologies

     *  Superfund Innovative Technologies Evaluation

     »  Indoor Air Research Plan

     *  Integrated Air Cancer Project

     »  Radon Mitigation Program

     »  FY '88 Budget Proposal for the Office of Research and  Development

-------
                                   - 2 -
In addition, the Science Advisory Board  is scheduled to conduct scientific
reviews for the following research programs later this fiscal year: advances
in neurotoxioology, health effects of disinfectants and disinfectant by-
products; acid deposition; radon and indoor air; biological control agents;
effectiveness of asbestos removal processes; control of water quality  in water
distribution systemsj land disposal; and waste minimization.

     The purpose of presenting this information is to inform you that  such
reviews have focused both the SAB'S and  the Agency's thinking on research
plans and needs to a degree never before achieved through preparation  and
review of the Five Year Research and Development Plan (Research Outlook).
As you know, Congress has required that  the Agency provide the SAB with the
opportunity to review the Plan.  The Board believes that its extensive
research progratti reviews fulfill the spirit and intent of Congress for SAB
oversight of the Agency's research program,  Cewtisnts on specific issues in
the five year plan have also been addressed in individual research program
reviews.

     The Board reiterates its long-standing support of research directed to
address problems beyond the immediate regulatory needs of the Agency.  It is
preparing a separate report on this and other issues as it reviews the proposed
research budget for Fiscal Year 1988.
                               Sincerely,
                               Norton Nelson
                               Chairman
                               Science Advisory Board
                                                        >\

-------
     The  attached  report  contains  more  detailed  responses  to
these issues.

     We are pleased to have had the  opportunity  to  be  of service
to the  Agency and  look  forward  to  a  written  response to  our
report,

                            Sincerely,
                            Norton Nelson, Chairman
                            Executive Committee
                            science Advisory Board
                            Raymond Loehr, Chairman
                            Environmental Engineering Committee
                                Kjca Advisory Board
                               / i       -
                            Paul Roberts, Chairman
                            Unsaturated Zone Code Subcommittee
                            Environ»ental Engineering committee
cc: W. Porter
    S, Lowrance
    J. Denit
    s. Weil
    M. Strauss
    Z. Saleem

-------
     The Subcommittee  believes that there are no serious problems
associated with treating  the fluid as incompressible,  isothermal,
and homogeneous.   The  acceptability  of  all  the  other  assumptions
hinges  on the application  of  the  model.    certain  classes of
phenomena ar« not well enough understood  to be  incorporated  into
a management model  of the kind reviewed here.   Because  of the
importance of these  phenomena  to site-specific  applications,
there is  an  urgent  need  for scientific research to  clarify the
scientific principles  underlying these  phenomena.   Such research
would have benefits beyond this  model.   The FECTUZ  model  package
is  also  subject to  limitations  imposed  by its  simplifying
assumptions  and  the  scarcity of  data  necessary for  parameter
estimation*   Both  versions  of. the  model  are incomplete  in the
sense that several potentially  important  governing  processes are
neglected  altogether.     The   Subcommittee   believes   these
limitations are not so debilitating as to preclude its employment
for generalized regulatory development applications, but believes
that  the inability to take into  account  several potentially
relevant  processes  casts serious  doubt  on the advisability of
site-specific applications,   it is  recommended that  the  Agency
mount  directed  and  continuing  efforts  (a)   to  improve the
knowledge  base  concerning  relevant  processes  which  have  been
neglected on grounds of inadequate understanding,and  (b)  to  seek
expert  consensus  in  these  areas,  especially biotransformation,
immiscible transport,  and fracture transport.

     The  Subcommittee  finds  that  for  the intended tasks in
regulatory development, the  composite model consisting of  FECTUZ-
A and EPA-SMOD  is  acceptable  from the standpoint  of simplicity
and computational  ease.   where Monte  Carlo replication  of the
model is planned, the  overall uncertainty of the transport model
should be  addressed because the Monte  Carlo methodology  is not
able to account for uncertainties  arising from incompleteness or
deficiencies in the underlying model.  However, for site-specific
decisions where the accuracy and  completeness  of  representation
of  transport  and transformation  processes  is  of paramount
importance,  the FECTUZ  model  seems bound to be inadequate,
especially  the  analytical version  owing  to   its implicit
simplifications and its  inability to take  into account  temporal
variations,  site-specific  conditions and heterogeneity.  The
Office of Solid waste  should take  special care  to  warn potential
users against site-specific applications of  the  composite model,
because there is a  substantial  danger  that such usage could  be
misleading and detrimental to the protection  of groundwater
quality.

     Additionally,  the  Subcommittee  has expressed concerns
and made  suggestions  relating to how the Agency establishes the
need for the development, of a new model,  how existing models are
evaluated, and  on the  existence  and  use  of  adequate  in-house
capability for evaluating issues  related  to transport  model
development and application.

-------