UNITED  STATES  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                                     WASHINGTON,   D.C.  20460
                                         DEC
                                      1998
MEMORANDUM
                                                   EPA 540-F-98-061
                                                   OSWER 9200.4-29P
SUBJECT:   Proposed TSCA §403 Soil Lead Hazard and OSWER's Lead-in-Soils
             Policy

FROM:      Lynn R. Goldman, M.D.  Assistant Administrator^j^^'^
             Office of Prevention, Pesticides and ToxiQ/JubsJances./   .  „
TO:
Timothy Fields, Jr.  Acting Assistant Administrator
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response

Regional Administrators, Regions I-X
       The purpose of this memorandum is to address some concerns that have been brought to our
attention following the June 3, 1998 publication of the proposed Toxic Substances Control  Act
(TSCA)§ 403 Rule.  In particular, questions have arisen about the relationship between the proposed
TSCA §403 rule and the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response's (OSWER's) Interim Soil
Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Facilities (OSWER Directive # 9200.4-27P,
August 27,1998). This memo draws upon existing information in the TSCA §403 proposal, the 1994
TSCA §403 guidance and the OSWER soil lead directive to address this issue.

Proposed TSCA §403 Rule

       The June 3,1998, proposal would identify lead-based paint hazards, which include hazardous
lead paint as well as residential dusts and  soils that have levels of lead considered to be hazards
(regardless of whether they were contaminated with paint or other lead sources). In addition, TSCA
§403 requires the Agency to identify lead-containing residential dusts and soils, some of which present
public health concerns but may be lower than the levels identified by the hazard standards. These dusts
and soils are referred in the statue as lead-contaminated dust and lead-contaminated soil. In the
preamble to the proposal and in accompanying draft guidance, EPA identified 400 parts per million
(ppm) of lead  in soil as a level of public health concern.  When environmental  levels exceed the
contamination level, EPA's baseline expectation is that children may be at risk of having elevated blood
lead levels. The occurrence and the magnitude of this risk will depend on the specific circumstances.

       EPA has proposed a 2,000 ppm hazard standard for lead in soil at which children's exposures
will be associated with a greater certainty of harm. When soil lead levels exceed the hazard level, the

-------
Agency has a strong expectation, even in the absence of further data on local circumstances, that
children will be at appreciable risk of elevated blood lead levels. The hazard standard was intended
as a "worst first" level that will aid in setting priorities to address the greatest lead risks promptly. The
proposed §403 regulations and the accompanying guidance are to be used by Federal, State, and Tribal
lead paint programs, as well as by the industry performing inspections and risk assessments.

       Already several weeks into the public comment period, EPA has received some comments that
indicate a lower standard may be a more appropriate standard for protecting children. At the same
time, others that have provided comments indicate that the proposed level of 2,000 ppm may tend to
refocus efforts away from addressing other lead hazards in housing. EPA has extended the public
comment period and is holding workshops with Federal agencies and affected groups to bring forward
as much information as possible to inform the final decision.

OSWER's Soil Lead Directive

       The OS WER soil lead directive that provides guidance for the cleanup of lead-contaminated
sites under the CERCLA and RCRA laws,  is unaffected by this proposal. CERCLA and  RCRA soil
lead cleanups should follow the approach in the  1998 directive.  In contrast with minimum national
standards that are designed to be used at millions of widely varying sites across the nation under
TSCA  §403, the studies that take place at CERCLA or RCRA sites allow levels to be developed that
consider site-specific information. The TSCA §403 proposed 2,000 ppm hazard level should not be
treated as an Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement (ARARs), "to be considered" or
TBC, or media cleanup standard (MCS). As recognized in the TSCA §403 rule, lead contamination
at levels below 2,000 ppm may pose a serious health risk based upon a site-specific evaluation and
may warrant timely response actions. Thus, the 2,000 ppm proposed hazard standard under TSCA
§403 should not be used to modify approaches to  addressing Brownfields, RCRA sites, National
Priorities List (NPL) sites, State Superfund sites, federal CERCLA removal actions and CERCLA
non-NPL facilities.

Program Similarities

       At lead-contaminated residential sites, both OPPTS and OSWER seek to protect the health of
the most susceptible population (children under seven years of age) and to promote a program that
assesses and addresses risk. The approaches taken by the two programs share many important aspects,
but also differ in some respects because of the purposes of each program.

       The OSWER soil lead directive and the TSCA §403 proposed  rule both rely upon  the
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model (IEUBK) for lead in children.  The OSWER soil lead
guidance recommends that the IEUBK Model be applied to utilize site-specific information that can
be very important in evaluating the risks at hazardous waste sites with residential exposure scenarios.
Similarly, the TSCA §403 proposal employs analyses that have relied upon the IEUBK Model to
assess risks to children.

-------
       In the absence of site-specific information, EPA believes that soil lead levels above 400 ppm
may pose a health risk to children through elevated blood lead levels. The 400 ppm screening level
identified in the OSWER soil lead guidance is consistent with the "level of concern" identified in the
preamble to the proposed TSCA §403 rule. Site-specific information would provide a basis to identify
a different soil lead level that would be protective of health. Although lead contamination at levels
below 2,000 ppm may not meet the TSCA 403 proposed hazard level, it may pose serious health risks
and may warrant timely response actions including abatement.

Conclusion

       In closing, we want to emphasize that the proposed 2,000 ppm hazard level for lead in soils
is not a final level and may change in response to public comments. The proposed level should not
be used to modify or select responses at RCRA, CERCLA, Brownfields, or State Superfund sites.

       We hope that the clarifications provided in this memorandum are helpful. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call Lynn Goldman at 202-260-2902 or Tim Fields at 202-260-4610.
Regional program managers should contact Larry Reed, Deputy Director of the Office of Emergency
and Remedial  Response (OERR)  in OSWER at 703-603-8960 or John Melone, Director of the
National Program Chemical Division (NPCD) in OPPTS at 202-260-1866.

cc:    RCRA/CERCLA National  Program Managers, Regions I - X
       Steve Luftig
       Larry Reed
       Jim Woolford
       Bill Sanders
       John Melone

-------