&EPA
www.epa.gov/research
science in ACTION
INNOVATIVE RESEARCH FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
Estimation of Toxicity Using the Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (TEST)
Problem
Tens of thousands of chemicals are
currently in commerce, and
hundreds more are introduced every
year. Since experimental
measurements of toxicity are
extremely time consuming and
expensive, it is imperative that
alternative methods to estimate
toxicity are developed.
Solution
Quantitative Structure-
Activity/Property Relationship
(QSAR) models can be used to
estimate toxicity from molecular
structure (the atoms from which a
molecule is built and the particular
way the atoms are linked together).
To make use of these models, EPA
scientists developed the Toxicity
Estimation Software Tool (TEST).
TEST is a freely available program
that allows users to easily estimate
toxicity from molecular structure.
Endpoints
TEST estimates toxicity values for a
variety of toxicity endpoints
including:
• Acute aquatic toxicity
• Acute mammalian toxicity
• Bioaccumulation factor
• Developmental toxicity
• Mutagenicity
TEST can estimate physical
properties including:
• Boiling point
• Density
• Water solubility
• Thermal conductivity
Q T.E.S.T (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool)
Help
-1
CH
H,C
Molecule ID: |333-41-5 | Endpoint: | Fathead minnow LC50 (96 hr) | T | Method: [consensus
Q Relax fragment constraint Calci
(Above) Structure entry with TEST
TEST can provide toxicity values for
the WAste Reduction Algorithm
(WAR). WAR is used to evaluate
the environmental friendliess of
chemical process designs.1 TEST
can provide toxicity and physical
property values for the PARIS II
(Program for Assisting the
Replacement of Industrial Solvents)
methodology.2 PARIS II is used to
find more environmentally friendly
replacements for industrial solvents.
QSAR Methodology
QSARs are mathematical models
used to predict measures of toxicity
from physical characteristics of the
structure of chemicals (known as
molecular descriptors). Examples of
molecular descriptors include
connectivity indices and molecular
fragment counts (such as the number
of hydroxyl groups attached to
aromatic rings).
TEST utilizes a consensus approach
to make toxicity predictions. In the
consensus approach, predictions are
made using the average of the
predictions from several different
QSAR methods including
hierarchical clustering and group
contribution based methods.3 The
QSAR models were developed using
a pool of more than 800 descriptors.
Predictions from each QSAR
methodology are subject to a series
of constraints that ensure each
predicted value represents an
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
EPA600-F11019
July 2011
-------
interpolation rather than an
extrapolation.
Model Validation
The QSAR models were validated
by randomly dividing the data sets
into training and prediction sets. The
results from the validation exercises
(along with the data sets) are
provided with the software. The
prediction statistics typically exceed
those from other QSAR software
packages for the same endpoints.
TEST Results
TEST provides the prediction results
using a series of web pages so the
calculation details are completely
transparent.
References
1. Comp. Chem. Eng., 1999, 23
1477-1491.
I.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2002, 41,
5867-5877.
3. Toxicol. Mech. Method, 2008,18,
251-266.
Contacts
Todd Martin, Ph.D., Office of Research
& Development, 513-569-7682,
martin.toddfgiepa.gov
Douglas Young, Ph.D., Office of
Research & Development, 513-569-
7624, young.douglasfatepa. gov
(Below) Results from TEST
Toxicity prediction results for 333-41-5 for Consensus method
Prediction results
Endpoint
Fathead minnow LC^o (96 hr) -Log(mol/L)
Fathead minnow LC^o (96 hr) mg/L
Experimental value
CAS: 333-41-5
Source: ECOTOX
4.81
4.70
Predicted value*
5.20
1.91
4Note: the test chemical was present in the external test set.
Individual Predictions
Method
Hierarchical clustering
Single model
Group contribution
FDA
Nearest neighbor
Predicted value
-Log(mol/L)
5.39
4.92
4.84
4.S9
5.96
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Recycled/ recyclable
Printed with vegetable-based ink on
paper that consists of a minimum of
50% post-consumer fiber content
processed chlorine free
EPA600-F11019
July 2011
------- |