EPA/540/R-93/521
SITE EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES:
BIOSCRUBBER FOR REMOVING HAZARDOUS ORGANIC EMISSIONS
FROM SOIL, WATER AND AIR DECONTAMINATION PROCESSES
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, OH 45268
-------
DISCLAIMER
The information in this document has been funded in part by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement No.
CR-816813010 to Aluminum Company of America. The document has been subjected
to the Agency's administrative and peer review and has been approved for
publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
11
-------
FOREWORD
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by Congress with
protecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources. As the enforcer of
national environmental laws, the EPA strives to balance human activities and
the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. A key part of the
EPA's effort is its research into our environmental problems to find new and
innovative solutions.
The Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory (RREL) is responsible for
planning, implementing, and managing research, development, and demonstration
programs to provide an authoritative, defensible engineering basis in support
of the policies, programs, and regulations of the EPA with respect to drinking
water, wastewater, pesticides, toxic substances, solid and hazardous wastes,
and Super fund-related activities. This publication is one of the products of
that research and provides a vital communication link between the researcher
and the user community.
Now in its eighth year, the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program is part of EPA's research into cleanup methods for hazardous
waste sites around the Nation. Through cooperative agreements with
developers, alternative or innovative technologies are refined at the
bench-and-pilot scale level and then demonstrated at actual sites. EPA
collects and evaluates extensive performance data on each technology to use in
remediation decision-making for hazardous waste sites.
This report documents the results of 11 months laboratory-scale testing of
an engineered biofilter using an active synthetic medium. Effective and
efficient removal for a low level organic contaminant, toluene, from air was
demonstrated. A pilot-scale stand-alone unit with a compressor, biomass
removal capabilities, and an inorganic nutrient supply/recycle system, capable
of handling 4 CFM of flow, was designed and constructed. The unit will be
used for field pilot testing under an unattended mode of operation.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
iii
-------
ABSTRACT
An engineered biofliter was developed to digest hazardous organic emissions
from soil, water, and air decontamination processes. A bench scale under the
SITE Emerging Technology Program was tested for > 11 months for the removal of
low level toluene in air.
The bioscrubber contains a selected activated carbon medium to support
microbial growth. The bioscrubber was designed for large volume air streams
containing trace volatile organics. Almost complete removal of hazardous
organics was demonstrated. Compared with other biofilters using compost or
other naturally occurred media, the use of activated carbon in the bioscrubber
enhanced the degradation efficiency substantially for the test performed.
The bioscrubber efficiency results from the adsorption affinity and ideal
environment for biogrowth offered by activated carbon. The adsorption
affinity provides a sink for contaminants to enhance the biodegradation
efficiency. It also cushions the feed fluctuations to achieve a consistent
and high level removal efficiency. In a bench scale-unit, >95% removal was
demonstrated for an air stream containing <5 to 40 ppm of toluene.
A pilot-scale test unit, capable of handling 4 CFM of flow, was designed and
constructed. It is a stand-alone unit with a compressor, backwashing
capabilities, and an inorganic nutrient supply/recycle system. The unit was
intended to be used in a field test under an unattended mode of operation.
This report was submitted in fulfillment of Cooperative Agreement Number Cr
816813010 by Aluminum Company of America, under the partial sponsorship of the
Environmental Protection Agency. This report covers a period from July 1990
to February 28, 1993 and work was completed as of February 28, 1993.
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Disclaimer ii
Foreword iii
Abstract iv
Table of Contents v
Figures vi
Tables vi
Acknowledgements vi i
I. Executive Summary 1
II. Introduction 2
III. Conclusions and Recommendations 3
IV. Discussion 3
A. Background 3
1. General Overview 3
2. Configuration 4
3. Key System and Operating Variables 4
4. Maintenance Requirement 5
5. Cost 6
6. Future Improvements 6
B. Bench-Scale Apparatus 6
1. General Description 6
2. Influent Air 8
3. FiIter Configuration 8
C. Inoculation 11
D. Results 13
1. Removal During Inoculation 13
2. Biodegradation Efficiency 13
3. Effect of Flow Rate 15
4. Feed Fluctuation 15
5. Pressure Drop and Bio-mass Build-up 21
V. Pilot Unit 25
VI. Qual ity Assurance 28
A. Calibration Curve 28
B. Sampling 30
C. Method Detection Limit 30
VII. References 34
VIII. Appendix A 35
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Number
1 Bench-Scale Representation 7
2 Schematic of Bench-top BioScrubber Unit 9
3 A Bench-Scale BioScrubber Unit with Gas Delivery System 10
4 Removal of Toluene During Inoculation -Column C . . . . 14
5 Removal of Toluene During Inoculation -Column B . . . 14
6 Removal of 10 ppm Toluene From Air with a Bioscrubber -
Column A 16
7 Removal of 10 ppm Toluene Air with a Bioscrubber . . .
Column B 17
8 Removal of 10 ppm Toluene using a Bioscrubber
Column C 18
9 Removal of 10 ppm of Toluene from Air using a Bioscrubber
Column D 19
10 Removal of 10 ppm Toluene Air using a Bioscrubber . . .
Column E 20
11 Pressure Drop of Column C During 3/23/92 to 2/7/93 . .
12 Pressure Drop of Column B During 6/4/92 to 2/7/93 ... 23
13 Pressure Drop of Column A During 3/23/92 to 2/7/93 . . 24
14 Pilot Scale BioScrubber Unit 26
15 BioScrubber Field Unit Flow Diagram 27
16 Plot for Determining Method of Detection Limit (MDL) 31
LIST OF TABLES
Number
1 Carbon Loadings in Each BioScrubber 11
2 Benzoic Acid Media for Inoculation 11
3 COD History During Inoculation 12
4 Inorganic Nutrient 12
5 Calibration of Standard Gas Mixtures of Toluene . 28
VI
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This document was prepared under Cooperative Agreement No. CR 816813 by
Aluminum Company of America, Pittsburgh, PA under sponsorship of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Naomi P. Barkley of the Risk Reduction
Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio was the Project Officer responsible
for the preparation of this document and deserves special thanks for her
helpful comments and advice. Special acknowledgement is given to Norma M.
Lewis, Chief, Emerging Technology Section, SITE Demonstration and Evaluation
Branch, Superfund Technology Demonstration Division for providing technical
guidance and input.
Participating in the development of this report for the Aluminum Company
of America were Dr. Paul K.T. Liu, R. L. Gregg and H. K. Sabol.
vn
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Biofiltration has been accepted recently for trace contaminant removal
from air. The existing technology uses naturally occurring materials, such as
compost, bark, peat, etc. Under the SITE Emerging Technology Program, an
engineered biofilter has been developed using an active synthetic medium,
activated carbon, which offers more effective, reliable and efficient
operation. Through advanced engineering design, this filter incorporates the
features of bio-mass removal, nutrient supplement, and moisture addition.
This advanced filter was developed based upon > 11 months of operating
experience using a bench-scale unit. The unit consistently demonstrated > 95%
of removal efficiency for an air stream contaminated with -10 ppm of toluene
with an empty bed contact time of ~1 second. Its degradation rate was 40-80
times higher than the rate of existing systems using naturally occurring
materials under the performed condition. This enhanced degradation efficiency
is probably due to the adsorption offered by the activated carbon to enhance
the substrate concentration.
In addition to the efficient degradation, the biofilter with activated
carbon media provides an effective sink to cushion the feed fluctuation. This
was evidenced by the consistent removal of the contaminant during the > 11
months of operation with a feed fluctuated from < 5 to 40 ppm. Pressure drop
of 0-20" of water was observed during the 11 months of operation. The
pressure drop was primarily attributed to the restriction and flow
distribution experienced with a small-scale bench-top unit. The actual
pressure drop for a bio-filter is anticipated to be minimal due to the use of
a shallow bed.
The biomass generated from the filter is believed to be similar to the
sludge generated from the biological water and wastewater treatment. If
non-biodegradable contaminants are present in the feed, they may be trapped in
the bio-mass due to the exposure of the biomass to the feed. Further study
may be necessary to determine the extent of the accumulation and, if
necessary, an appropriate disposal of the bio-mass.
The proposed technology will have a wide spectrum of applications to clean
up superfund sites. Potential areas include: (1) organic emission control for
groundwater decontamination using air strippers, (2) emission control for
biological treatment of ground and surface water, and (3) emission control for
soil decontamination. These primary treatment processes currently under
development or practice have not been designed to prevent VOC emission from
discharging into the atmosphere. However, the requirement of treating these
airborne pollutants may cause these treatment processes to become expensive or
prohibitive economically. The proposed technology is an ideal post-treatment
for these processes due to its effectiveness in handling trace organic
volatiles economically and effectively.
The bioscrubber developed here using activated carbon as a medium provides
several operational advantages over conventional activated carbon adsorbers
for the above applications. The bio-regeneration keeps the maximum adsorption
capacity available constantly; thus, the mass transfer zone remains stationary
and relatively short. No regeneration of the carbon is required and the bed
length required is greatly reduced. These features translate into a reduced
capital and operational cost. The bioscrubber's advantages would be fully
-------
utilized when off-gas contains weakly adsorbed contaminants, such as methylene
chloride, or adsorbates competing with moisture in the stream. Finally the
chromatographic effect (or premature desorption) commonly experienced in an
adsorber would not exist because the maximum capacity is available constantly.
The bioscrubber is anticipated to replace some existing applications currently
using activated carbon.
A pilot unit has been designed and constructed and will be field-tested at
selected Superfund sites in the near future. The unit includes a feed
delivery system with a compressor, an inorganic nutrient storage and delivery
system, and the bio-mass removal device. The unit is intended to be operated
under an "unattended" mode.
II. INTRODUCTION
Biofiltration, in its most general sense, is the removal and
decomposition of contaminants from gases into nonhazardous substances through
the use of micro-organisms. Bio-filters are believed to be the most
economical way to treat the low level contaminants (up to several thousand
ppm) in gas streams.
For efficient operation, the filter media must meet several requirements:
Provide optimum environmental conditions for the resident microbes
Consist of uniform pore size and particle structure (for low bed
pressure drop, minimizing gas channeling, high reactive surfaces)
Have minimal bed compaction (minimize maintenance, media replacement)
Composition of an existing commercially available biofilter, compost and
other naturally occurring media, generally satisfies the first requirement by
providing sufficient nutrients for the micro-organisms (typically bacteria),
except for particularly refractory contaminants (i.e., chlorinated
compounds) The problem with composting, however, is the huge space
requirement compounded by continual loss of effective surface area during
biomass build up (slothing).
An activated carbon-based biofiltration module, a bio-scrubber, has been
developed to improve the existing bio-filtration systems. These synthetically
produced filters address the current deficiencies of composting and other
naturally occurring media-based biofilters. Its advantages are:
Low pressure drops
Minimal pressure drop loss due to slothing
Much smaller bed requirements (allows the use of compact filters only)
Allows removal of biomass if necessary
High water retention in the microporosity (long shelf life while not in
use; during start up/shut down, minimal requirement for additional water
addition)
In addition, activated carbon media beds provide one more key separation
mechanism for biofilters, adsorption of gases onto the carbon. This provides
the following advantages:
-------
Increased surface concentration of contaminants
Removal of hydrophobic gases that would not typically be absorbed into
the aqueous phase
Allow the biofilter to be efficient at lower concentrations of
contaminants
The above attributes also could result in enhanced biodegradation of
substances that would not typically be efficiently degraded in a biofilter
providing additional applications for the technology.
This study focused on the development of an advanced biofilter using selected
activated carbon as media. The engineering consideration required included
(1) environment for biogrowth, (2) nutrient supplement device, and (3) biomass
removal mechanism The filter thus developed demonstrated an efficient and
effective removal of toluene removal from air for > 11 months of operation.
Ill CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A bench-scale bio-scrubber was operated for > 11 months, successfully
demonstrating an effective and efficient removal for a low level inorganic
contaminant, i.e., -10 ppm of toluene in air. The unit is packed with a
selected granular activated carbon, instead of compost-type media used in the
existing biofiltration technologies. This reusable active medium allows the
removal of the biomass, when necessary, to prevent the compaction of the
medium as experienced using existing technology. In addition, the unit
demonstrated 40-80 times higher biodegradation rate than the existing
technology's under the testing condition. The pressure drop experienced
during the 11 month period is minimal, i.e., 0 to 20 inches of water for most
of the time. The occasional removal of the biomass helps to control the
pressure drop at this desirable level. The unit offers a desirable
environment for biogrowth by maintaining a humid state and supplementing
inorganic nutrients. A pilot unit has been designed and constructed with
these features, and field-testing at selected superfund sites is recommended.
IV. DISCUSSION
A. BACKGROUND
After the award of this project by US EPA (CR-816813), several biofilter
systems developed in Europe were introduced into the U.S. Although these
biofilters are different from the bioscrubber developed here, they share the
similarity in terms of application and basic principle. In addition, a review
paper9 was published summarizing the state-of-the-art biofiltration
technology. The literature review here highlights the key elements involving
the existing commercially available technology outlined in Reference 9 as
baseline information for bench-marking purposes.
1. General Overview
Biofiltration is now a well-established air pollution control technology in
several European countries. As many as 500 biofilters are currently in use in
Germany and the Netherlands. Some development and installations have been
-------
made in the United States since ~1960's, although to a much lesser extent1'8.
Control efficiencies of >90% have been achieved from many common air
pollutants. Due to lower operating cost, bio-filtration if applied to
appropriate systems can provide significant economic advantages over other air
pollution control technologies. It is suitable for off-gases containing
readily biodegradable pollutants in low concentrations, typically less than
several thousand ppm as methane. Environmental benefits include low energy
requirements for operation and a complete degradation of the pollutants.
Biofiltration is a technology utilizing a fixed-biological film supported on
the solid phase to remove air contaminants from off-gas streams through
aerobic degradation. End products from the complete biodegradation of air
contaminants are C02, water, and microbial biomass. The oxidation of reduced
sulfur and chlorina ted organic compounds also generates inorganic acids, which
could change the pH of the system and possibly are toxic to the bacteria.
2 . Configuration
To date, most biofilters have been built as open single-bed systems. Open,
multiple story systems are also built if space constraints exist. Some
European firms have developed enclosed systems usually with stacked beds.
Media used include compost, mineral soil, peats and others. Microscopically,
a biofilter can be perceived as a biofilm established around the media; a
concentration profile exists from the bulk gas stream through the biofilm and
then to the solid surface. A first order degradation kinetics has been
suggested although the actual degradation kinetics is probably far more
complicated. Many of the existing biofilters are single systems installed on
livestock and food processing applications. Filter areas typically range from
100 to 22,000 ft (10 to 2,000 M ) with off-gas flow rates between 600 to
90,000 CFM (1,000 to 150,000 M3/hr).
3 . Key System and Operating Variables
• Acclimation
For common, easily biodegradable organic compounds, acclimation typically
requires about 10 days. If compounds, that are less biodegradable and for
which suitable microorganisms are less likely to be initially present in the
filter material, are to be treated, inoculation with an appropriate culture
can reduce the acclimation period, and such inoculation is practiced by
several firms.
• Temperature and Degradation Rate
For optimum results, it is recommended that the off-gas temperature be
maintained between 20 to 40'C (68 to 105"F). A decline in removal
efficiency could occur at lower temperatures, particularly <10'C.
Degradation rates of common air pollutants typically range from 10 to 100
g/M3/hr. The degradation rate for toluene was reported to be 20 to 30
g/M3/hr for the concentration > 200 ppm. A nearly linear relationship
between the degradation rate vs. concentration was reported for the
concentration < 200 ppm.
-------
• Flow Rates
Filter loads of up to 300 M3/hr of off-gas per M2 of filter (16 scfm ft2)
are usually feasible without resulting in excessively high back pressures.
Surface loads as high as 500 M3/m2/hr have been treated with good removal
efficiency. The pressure drop at 300M3/hr/M2 is about 6" and then
increases to -20" of water at > 500 MVMZ/hr. An improved medium mixed with
coarse bark reduces the pressure drop significantly.
• Surge and Intermittent Loading
The filter's huge buffer capacity prevents breakthroughs during peak
loadings, and allows sizing based on hourly average rather than
instantaneous peak loads. The buffer capacity of a filter for a particular
application will vary depending on water solubility of the target pollutants
and surface loading rates. Most industrial sources of air pollutants do not
operate continuously. It has therefore been of interest whether the
biological activity of a biofilter could survive during extended shut-down
periods. It is suggested that filter beds can survive at least two weeks
without any significant reduction in microbial activity. If sufficient
nutrients are provided by the filter material, survival periods of up to two
months can be expected.
• Media
Compost, usually produced from municipal waste, wood chips, bark or
leaves, has generally been the basis of filter material used in recent
applications in Europe. Peat and heather mixtures have also been used. The
bio-filters originally built in the US were mostly "soil-beds" for which
biologically active mineral soils were used as filter materials. Preferred
fresh material properties include a pH between 7 and 8, a pore volume of
greater than 80%, and a total organic matter content, measured as LOI, of
>55%. Activated carbon can be used to increase the filter's buffer capacity
for emissions from sources that operate only intermittently This can
reduce the filter volume significantly.
Typically, a compost-based filter material will provide sufficient
inorganic nutrients from microorganisms and the addition of nutrient will
not be required. In some cases, however, depending upon the target
pollutant and the source of the filter material, the availability of
specific nutrients might become a process limiting factor. The fresh media
are required to be tested for potentially hazardous constituents (e.g.,
heavy metals) before installation in the filter in order to avoid the
potential complication in disposal of spent material.
4 . Maintenance Requirement
The off-gas must be saturated with water since it would otherwise remove
moisture from the filter material resulting in drying of the bed, the death of
most organisms and a total loss of control efficiency. Spray nozzles usually
provide the required humidity in the humidification chamber. Additional
automatic irrigation of the filter beds from the top is also used in some
systems to maintain the required moisture content in the filter materials. A
useful life for filter materials of up to three to five years has been
-------
reported. Maintaining the porosity of the compost by turning it over, and/or
replacing it entirely, once spent, are the second major maintenance
requirements for biofilters with compost-bed filter materials.
5. Cost
The operating cost is about $0.60 to $1.50 7100,000 ft3 off-gas in Europe
$0.30 to 0.60 is reported in the US.
6. Future Improvements
Reported failures in the operation of the existing biofilter include:
Insufficient treatment due to under size of the filter
Off-gas is toxic to microorganisms, e.g., S02
Insufficient humidification
Generation of acidic degradation end- and by-products can result in a
drop in pH and destruction of the microbial population.
Rapid compaction of inappropriate filter material can often, in
combination with inhomogeneous humidification, result in the formation of
cracks and breakthrough of untreated off-gas.
Compaction should be kept to a minimum, reducing the need for maintenance
and replacement of the filter materials. Mineralization of the organic matter
in bio-filters will eventually lead to compaction of the filter materials and
a corresponding increase in back pressure. Future improvement in the physical
properties and longevity of the filter material is needed because they will
result in reduced cost for energy and maintenance.
In summary, the use of biofiltration has demonstrated a viable and
economical way to remove trace contaminants from air. Elimination of the
compaction with an improved filter media and a biomass removal device offers
an opportunity to correct the deficiency of the existing bio-filter. In
addition, the use of the natural media requires a large surface area, which
may be a constraint in certain applications. The objective of this study was
to develop an engineered medium/filter with the following features: (1)
avoidance of the compaction of the medium, (2) reusable media, thus no
replacement and disposal requirement, (3) more effective, thus can offer a
space-efficient and more controlled filter. Use of a selected granular
activated carbon could satisfy the above need if a proper engineering design
is built in to provide a suitable environment for bio-growth. A benchscale
unit was designed and operated for >11 months successfully in the lab. The
result from this operation is discussed in the following.
B. APPARATUS
1. General Description
A bench-top bioscrubber testing unit including the biofilters and gas
supply, was assembled in the laboratory. The bench-scale apparatus (Figure 1)
-------
M
C
E
D
O
U
U
V>
O
CD
Humid Air'
Dry Air
f Y\
Mass
Flow
Controllers
Humidifiers
Mass
Flow
Controllers
House Air
Air Filter
Nutrient Resevolr
Toluene
Cyl Indcr
~500ppm
1. Bench Scale Representation (not to scale)
-------
consists of five parallel glass columns (2.5 x 61 cm), each of which is
connected to one of two humidified air streams (0.5 to 4 1/min). Each air
stream contains -10 ppm of toluene.
Three glass columns with 2.5 cm ID and -60 cm L were packed with selected
activated carbons ( US Mesh 10x14) as filters. Four sampling ports were
installed along the axial length of the column for gas sampling and pressure
drop measurement, as shown in Figure 2. Air containing 10 ppm of toluene was
prepared by diluting the custom-premixed gas containing 500 ppm of toluene in
air. Flow rates ranging from 0.5 to 4 liter/min were controlled with MRS mass
flow meters and controllers. Both feed and effluents were sampled with a
Precision gas tight 1 ml syringe, then analyzed by gas chromatography (GC).
The method of detection limit was determined to be 0.86 ppm. The analytical
method is detailed in Section V. Pressure drop was measured with a
Monagahelic pressure gauge (0 to 100" water). Excess biomass was removed as
required by manually removing, gently washing and replacing the affected
carbon in Zone A. Inorganic nutrient, required for biological growth, was fed
to the column down flow at a 0.1 ml/hr rate. A picture of the bench-top unit
and its delivery system is presented in Figure 3.
2. Influent Air
The humidified air stream is prepared by passing bottled breathing air
through a Balston cleaner/dryer (type A, BX, DX) and then through a sparging
bottle containing deionized water. The sparging bottle temperature is
maintained by placing the unit in a Blue M Magni-Whirl constant temperature
bath, The humid air stream is split and the flow rates of the two streams are
controlled by a mass flow controller (type 1259 MRS, Inc). The toluene
containing gas, 500 ppm, is mass controlled and mixed with an air stream to
produce a humidified air stream containing 10 ppm toluene (refer to Figure 1).
The humidity and temperature of the two influent streams is continuously
monitored by in-line Panametrics moisture probes (type M2LRT) connected to a
Panametrics System I hygrometer, interfaced to a two-channel strip chart
recorder. A septum port is connected at the outlet of each probe assembly to
facilitate syringe sampling of each toluene-laden stream at specified
intervals. Each air stream is separately connected to manifolded Cole/Parmer
rotameter/controllers and split into five isolated streams (refer to Figure
2). These streams are defined as the influent to each column.
3. Filter Configuration
The five columns are identical with respect to materials of construction.
Each is a 2.5 x 61 cm ACE Glass Inc air sampling manifold with two threaded
(nylon) sampling ports attached at 1/4 and 1/2 the length of the tube. The
threaded endcaps are PTFE with 1/4" NPT female outlets. A 304 SS screen (20 x
20 mesh) is placed on top of the bottom endcap to support the granular
activated carbon (GAC). The effective volume of each column is -295 ml.
The branched inlet to each column provides connections for influent, pumped
nutrient solution, and a pressure gauge to monitor back pressure in the
column. The outlet tubing is open to the atmosphere except when connected to
the effluent sampling chamber.
-------
1 inch ID.
Influent
Zone A ~ 5 inches
Zone B - 6 inches
Zone C
12 inches
Total column
length - 23
inches
Effluent
Figure 2. Schematic of Bench-top Bio-Scrubber Unit
-------
Figure 3. A Bench-Scale BioScrubber Unit with Gas Delivery System
The effluent sampling chamber consists of an in-line Panametrics moisture
probe assembly with a septum port connection on the outlet of the probe
assembly. This chamber provided effluent humidity and temperature data and a
convenient port at the specified sampling interval. There is only one
effluent sampling chamber for all effluent columns. The chamber is connected
to the column of interest and purged for 2 minutes prior to sampling.
All tubing is 1/4" TFE with 316 SS connections and PTFE ferrules. All
wetted parts in the sampling chamber and gauges are either 316 SS, nickel,
viton, or PTFE. Again, silicon rubber septa (Supelco Thermogreen™ LB-2) are
used in place of PTFE-backed septa in both the chamber and column sampling
ports. Columns A & C contained wood-based GAC from Westvaco, screened to a 10
x 14 standard mesh size. Coal-based GAC from Calgon Carbon with the same mesh
size was packed in Columns B, D & E. The carbon loading in each column is
listed in Table 1.
10
-------
TABLE 1 Carbon Load in:
Column
A
B
C
D
E
Westvaco
Calgon
Westvaco
Calgon
Calgon
* in Each Bio -Scrubber
Carbon Dosage (g)
87.3
167.0
89.5
165.0
150.9
C. INOCULATION
Prior to 1992, the bio-scrubbers were operated successfully and steadily for
a period of 3 months before the decay of the removal efficiency. Our
diagnosis concluded that channeling of the air flow, drying of the filter
media, and a poor inoculation procedure were the possible sources of the
activity decline. An improved inoculation and maintenance procedure was
developed, which led to a steady operation for > 11 months. This improved
inoculation is summarized as follows.
In the first quarter of 1992, five bio-scrubbers were re-inoculated. A new
inoculation procedure was developed to solve the problem of air channeling in
the carbon bed. A dilute benzoic acid solution, listed in Table 2, supported
the growth of the biomass and allowed for impregnation without clogging the
pore of the carbon. The inoculation procedure consisted of adding 100 ml of
activated sludge, collected from a local sewage plant, to the benzoic acid
media in batch mode and allowed to feed on its nutrients for 5 days before it
was poured into the carbon columns. Biological growth in the inoculum was
monitored visually insuring the success of the incubation. The biofilter was
fed an -10 ppm toluene/air mixture at the rate of 0.5 1/min during its five
day incubation period. Table 3 shows the concentration history during the
TABLE 2 Benzoic Acid Media for Inoculation
To 1L of Tap Water:
Benzoic Acid C6H5COOH
Ammonium Chloride (NII,(1)
Sodium Metaphosphate [(NaP03)13Na20]
Sodium Metaphosphate (NaHC03)
500 mg/1
139 mg/1
25 mg/1
3625
11
-------
TABLE 3 COO History Ourlnq Inoculation
Initial COO for Influent (3/5/92)
Column
A
B
C
D
E
COO fmoyi)
> 1500
> 1500
> 1500
> 1500
> 1500
COD Analysis for Effluent (3/6/92)
Column
B
D
COD (me/ 1)
30
25
COD Analysis for Effluent (3/9/92)
Column
A
B
D
E
con (mp/n
470
25
55
20
PH
6.2
8.24
8.3
7.7
incubation. The initial feed concentrations reached 550 mg/1; by the fifth
day, column B had a COD concentration range of 2050 mg/L. Column influents
remained in the range of 10 ppm with an occasional fluctuation approaching 30
ppm. All influent variation was corrected immediately without causing any
alteration in column performance.
No toluene breakthrough was reported in the effluent of Columns A and C for
the first 1.5 months of operation. The biomass supported on the GAC allowed
the feed to be completely consumed with its 5 cm length from the influent to
the first port. As shown in figure 4, operation of the bioscrubbers continued
with complete toluene removal by Port C for all columns.
In addition, an inorganic nutrient was supplemented to the column for the
inorganic requirement to sustain the bio-growth. The inorganic aqueous
solution provides additional humidification of the contaminated air within the
filter. The composition and flow rates were described in Table 4.
TABLE 4 Inorganic Nutrient
To 11 of water:
Ammonium Chloride (NH4C1)
Sodium Metaphospahte [ (NaPO^)i^Na^O]
Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCo^)
769 me/1
690 me/1
500 me/1
12
-------
D. RESULTS
The columns consistently degraded the contaminant for a period of >11
months. They have achieved a > 95% removal efficiency within the first 5 to
10 inches of the carbon bed. A stationary mass transfer zone was observed
with an empty bed contact time (EBCT) of 1 to 4 seconds depending on flow
rates. This performance indicates the effectiveness and efficiency of the
bioscrubbers developed in this program.
1. Removal During Inoculation
Since the columns were pre-saturated with -10 ppm of toluene in air prior
to inoculation, the removal of toluene immediately after inoculation on
3/23/92 was attributed to the biodegradation of the microorganism inoculated
on the carbon support. The roll-over of the pre-adsorbed toluene on the
carbon was observed in Column C on 3/23 (Figure 4). Approximately 0 ppm of
toluene was observed at Ports A & B; while about 6 ppm of toluene was observed
at Port C with a feed concentration around 10 ppm on the same day. Evidently,
the roll-over was resulted from desorption of the pre-adsorbed toluene along
the axial direction of the column. The bio-digestion was not capable of
degrading all toluene pre-adsorbed on the carbon, which then desorbed suddenly
due to the new adsorption equilibrium established by the inoculum. Since no
toluene was observed for Ports A & B, the removal of toluene by
bio-degradation rather than carbon adsorption was obvious. A similar
phenomenon was observed for Column B as shown in Figure 5. In this case, the
roll-over declined and disappeared for a slightly longer period, i.e., ~2
weeks for Ports A & B and ~5 weeks for Port C. In conclusion, the removal of
toluene by the bio-filter is evident based upon the roll-over phenomenon
observed during the initial inoculation. Infield start-up operation, no
roll-over will be observed since the contaminants need not be pre-adsorbed and
biodegradation will take place immediately.
2. Biodegradation Efficiency
Five columns have been operating since 3/23/92 until the present (February
1993). All columns were fed with 0.5 liters/minute of air containing -10 ppm
of toluene as a target concentration from 3/23 to 6/30/92 The actual feed
concentration fluctuated from 5 to 40 ppm as shown in Figure 6-10, while most
of the time it stayed between 10 to 20 ppm. During this period, no toluene
breakthrough was observed at Port A, indicating the effective mass transfer
zone was less than 5 inches, equivalent to > 19 g/M3/hr of biodegradation
efficiency. More importantly, the mass transfer zone remained stationary for
the entire period. Biodegradation of toluene evidently was effective and
complete, showing no signs of accumulation of contaminants or the metabolic
by-products. Bioregeneration of activated carbon has been discussed in the
literature as a means to prolong the GAC service life in water and waste water
treatment10'11- This study extends the similar concept to air pollution
control with the aid of a proper engineering design which offers a suitable
environment for biogrowth.
13
-------
30-
10
Mar-U Mar-27 Mar-30 Apr. 14 Apr- 15 Apr-20 Apr-23 Apr-29
•0- PORT A/Col C -B- PORT B T- PORT C ••• INFLUENT
Figure 4. Removal of Toluene During Inoculation- Column C
Mar-30
Apr-15
Apr-20
Apr-23
Apr-29
•O- PORT A/Col B -B PORT B ^T PORTC •*• INFLUENT
Figure 5. Removal of Toluene During Inoculation- Column B
14
-------
3 Effect of Flow Rate
After the successful demonstration of the concept, several additional
operating conditions were studied. The flow rates for Columns A and B were
increased to 1 liter/minute and then 2 liters/minute (Figures 6 & 7) while
Columns C, D & E remained at the original flow of 0.5 liter/minute (Figures 8,
9, & 10, respectively) to act as a control. The empty bed contact time (EBCT)
under the 2 liter/minute flow rate is about 2 seconds. During this period
(8/05 to 1/27/93 for Column A and 8/10/92 to 10/9/92 for Column B) , both show
some breakthrough ranging from 0 to 5 ppm at Port A (Figures 6 & 7).
Nevertheless, no toluene was detected at Port B in each column. The effective
mass transfer zone was estimated to be about 7.5 inches and remained
stationary for the entire period. This efficiency was equivalent to 51
g/M3/hr of biodegradation of toluene. Column B was further challenged by
increasing the flow rate to 4 liters/min, equivalent to 1 second of EBCT from
10/9/92 to 1/21/93. No contaminant breakthrough at Port B was observed for
the majority of the experimental period. In certain instances, i.e., on
December 30, 1992 and January 18, 1993, trace breakthroughs were observed, but
the column rapidly recovered to its typical efficiency. The breakthroughs
were possibly due to channeling of the flow. The mass transfer zone was
estimated to be approximately 10 inches at this flow rate, equivalent to 80
g/M3/hr of toluene. The flow rate of Column B was subsequently reduced to 0.5
liters/minute on 1/21/93 no toluene breakthrough was detected at Port B as
had been observed previously. The recovery of the column to the original mass
transfer zone indicates that the increase of the mass transfer zone from 5 to
10" is possibly due to the degradation kinetics vs. linear velocity of the
contaminant. Therefore, the mass transfer zone is concluded to be stationary
throughout the entire study.
According to the literature, the degradation rate for toluene by existing
biofilters is 20-30 g/M3/hr for concentrations £ 200 ppm. A nearly linear
relationship between degradation rate vs. concentration was reported for
concentrations <200 ppm. The performance observed in Columns A, B and C
indicates a 40 to 80 times higher degradation rate than existing filters with
naturally occurring media. This enhanced degradation is at least partially
attributed to the adsorption function performed by the activated carbon
medium.
Since no significant difference was observed between Columns A & C with a
wood-based carbon and Columns B, D & E with a coal-based carbon for the entire
operation period, it is believed that either carbon could deliver a similar
performance under the testing conditions studied thus far. A long term study
is required to assess the attrition loss of the carbon.
4. Feed Fluctuation
The biofilter adequately adsorbed fluctuations in the influent ranging
from 0 to 45 ppm for the majority of the study. The fluctuation observed in
the influent was not reflected in the analysis of Ports A and/or B, indicating
that activated carbon effectively acted as a sink to adsorb the temporary
concentration increases. This toluene "sink" was then, subsequently, digested
by the microorganisms during normal operation and/or concentration in
decreases.
15
-------
PORT A •» PORT B $ PORT C •* INFLUENT
Figure 6. Removal of 10 ppm Toluene From Air With A Bioscrubber- Column A
-------
iSSSSS
-e- POET A
•B- B
V PORTC
V INFLUENT
Figure 7. Removal of 10 ppm Toluene From Air With A HioSffiibber-Column B
-------
40
35
30
(PP
cn
TOL
20
15
10
5
0
-
-
Mtl_l
„
-
-
—
„„_
-
_
f
>
.
t
* *
II
f
t
t
*
/•
a.
>
:
J
\
|
j
/
i
5
«i
rFlow= y
O.SL/min
L J
t 1
; I •
: j •
• V • » •
X 1
.ftb
• • J I '
/
\ '.K'A'i
• : ^
* " f
1
i
..
'j
^
j
f
.
..
J
n
1 1 1
/
Jr
>-<
T,<
d
/
^
.
1
s
1
/
r
T
\
\
r
\
i
\
t
i
f-
H
S
s
V
>
/
I
<
V
X
i
^!
rr
r'«
\
V
^
"
it-tH
1 11
\
\
\
\
I
*
• •
t.
«*
t
t
i
i
v
i
*
Tl
^
H
\f-
*
S
r^
.j
ri
g
r
/,
''<
TTTTTl
'
1
^ •
voov«jjjr-^cjOoo'"r~'''r~"oS
-a-Port A
•& Port B •*• Effluent
Figure 8. Removal of 10 ppm Toluene Using A Bioscrubber-Column C
Influent
-------
90
80
70
la 60
a so
* 40
o>
30
20
10
0
-;
•
•
^
i
'I'
•ii
•4
•il
i
m
J?:' i
TD
Of .
I 1
V * '
V
i
1
•j.1
• •
• •
•
•
^•H
1
. ,
M
• • I •
Plows "|
3.5L/min 1
* 't '
Jf
: t
i Hi i in
^
n
x
M
n
H
N
•
k-ji
H
1
H«l
t
h
^
k>
H
\
/
1 1
^
**
**
^
1
H
H
H
H
N
n
K<
^
^
'H
n
-1
h r-
^
ue
*'*
••4
M
*4
M
M
H
M
H
M
^
M
M
^
t
"f
H
•^
**
/t
•4
;'
M
r'
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
r-<^<^}»-t»-i^-i^-»^-tf^o--»r^t^*oo «-*c^r4cji
^ttiii^^^r^"
i^H — c>iHrMC4O— •— •-- •
ea MOO MI
ss ss §s ss-e-g.-s
INFLUENT
-e- PORT A » PORTB ^ PORTC
Figure 9: Removal of 10 ppm Toluene From Air Using A Bioscrubber- Column D ^
-------
ro
O
S 40-
E
—
--
.
t
it
\
M
1
t
--
t
.i
1 \: : : \ : ;
J
|S
K*
TTow=
0.5L/min
b
•
•
•
:
^
)i!
)'•••'.••
.........
i j
•i I
.*. '
,4 '
:\*^
^*V"
4JL
^
,
S
M
M
H
M
1^
M
S
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
^
Ml
r<
^
^
M
^
M
S
Ml
r1
"i
f
^
V
*^-^
Ir^
M
M
M
Ml
k-<
Ml
H
M
^
M
M
M
•^
\
^
4f
MH
^
»-i
H
M
H
M
k-4
M
H
H
S
MJ
fc
\
H
j
: i
"M
*
:
4-
&&&&.&&$<
222<-?<22S22
-<•?-*-*-*^^
•«• PORT A
-a- PORT B * PORT C "* INFLUENT
Figure 10. Removal of 10 ppm Toluene From Air Using A Bioscrubber-Column E
-------
5. Pressure Drop and Bio-mass Build-up
The biomass generated and accumulated in the filter as a result of the
degradation of contaminants was expected. Biomass was visually detected
occupying the interparticle space. This build-up would essentially result in
a pressure drop increase. Occasional removal of the biomass manually was
practiced to maintain a minimal pressure drop throughout the operation period.
While the excess biomass was removed from the column, sufficient amounts of
biomass were retained on the carbon to maintain effective biodegradation when
the bed was replaced. The biofilter efficiency was not reduced as a result of
the biomass removal as indicated in Figures 6 to 10.
Pressure drop through the bio-scrubber is very minimal due to the shallow
bed requirement to contain the stationary mass transfer zone. However, if the
bio-mass build-up becomes significant, the pressure drop could increase
dramatically and become an operational problem. Pressure drop experienced
during the 11 months of operation is discussed in detail here.
Pressure drop experienced in Column C with a flow rate of 0.5 liter/min.
is presented in Figure 11. The pressure drop measured here is the difference
between the inlet and the outlet of the entire column, including the 25 inches
of the packed column, the fittings, and entrance and exit effects. Initially
the pressure drop throughout the entire column is « 10 inches of water until
the end of June. Then the pressure drop increased significantly to the level
of 60 and then 100 inches of water. After that, the pressure drop returned to
the 10 to 20 inch level or even to close to 0 inches in January and February
of 1993. It is believed that the turbulent pressure drop observed between
July and September of 1992 resulted from the bio-mass' build-up in the inlet
and channeling of the air flow in the presence of the aqueous nutrient
trickling down the column. Since the build-up may be sloughed-off and/or the
channeling may be rearranged, the pressure drop measured fluctuated
significantly and at an unsteady state. The carbon from inlet to Port A was
removed and washed to get rid of the bio-mass accumulation on October 21,
1992. The pressure drop since then has been maintained at < 20 inches of
water. It is concluded that the pressure drop in a bioscrubber is very
minimal, i.e., between 0 to 20 inches most of the time at the flow rate of 0.5
liters/min. The pressure drop could be reduced through the removal of the
biomass accumulation in the carbon. This is one of the advantages of the
engineered filter over the existing compost-type filter, where the compaction
of the bed eventually develops and the replacement of the bed is required.
The pressure drop in Column B is presented in Figure 12. It shows that
the pressure drop is between 5 to 15 inches for most of the time with the flow
rate at 1 liter/minute. The pressure drop observed seemed not correlated with
the flow rate increase from 1 to 2 and then 4 liters/min. In most of the
period the pressure drop was between 0 to 20 inches along with the occasional
washing of the carbon as indicated in the figure. The washing of the column
was performed as necessary to maintain the low pressure drop in the column.
Pressure drop in Column A showed a similar trend with the pressure drop
observed ranging from 0 to 25 inches of water for most of the time (Figure
13). Occasional washing of the carbon may help in curtailing the increase of
the pressure drop of the column.
21
-------
ro
ro
•* Influent
Figure 11. Pressure Drop of Column C During 3/25/92-2/7/93
* Date carbon was washed
-------
INJ
CO
* Influent
Figure 12. Pressure Drop of Column B During 6/4/92 to 2/7/93
* Date carbon was washed
-------
aj
f
I
I
I
I I I I I I I i I I 11 I I I I I I I I I
••• Influent
Figure 13. Pressure Drop of Column A During 3/23/92- 2/7/93
* Date carbon was washed
-------
In summary, the pressure drop experienced in the bench-scale bio-scrubber
ranged from 0 to 20 inches of water for most of the time for the flow rate
from 0.5 to 4 liter/min. The pressure drop experienced here approximates the
drop reported in the literature with a conventional media. The pressure drop
is believed to be primarily attributed to the bio-mass build-up, which can be
controlled via washing of the carbon. Occasional washing of the column as
necessary was practiced in this study. An automatic washing device was
designed for a field unit, which could deliver a much-reduced pressure drop..
V. PILOT UNIT
The pilot bioscrubber developed in this program is as simple as a carbon
adsorber system incorporated with a nutrient delivery system and a biomass
removal capability (Figures 14 & 15). Due to the simple configuration, it
can be integrated into existing production processes or added downstream from
existing remediation processes, such as air stripping towers, soil vacuum
vents, biological wastewater treatment, etc. The system consists of four
major components: (1) a gas delivery system, (2) the biofilter, (3) a nutrient
delivery system and (4) a bio-mass removal system. Through our extended
operating experience an advanced engineered and filtration technology has been
incorporated into the pilot testing unit to become a reliable and user
friendly biological treatment system. The gas delivery system sends the field
gas stream from the customer's site to the unit via a gas distribution plate
to ensure even distribution through the biofilter. Due to the short mass
transfer zone in the biofilter, the bed depth requirement is very shallow and
the need for a gas booster fan, if necessary at all, is minimal. Feed streams
must be cooled to 100*F or less prior to entering the biofilter because the
bacteria within the filter cannot be exposed to high temperatures. Other
pre-treatment, such as particulate removal, may be necessary if substantial
particulates are present in the feed. Due to the build-in bio-mass removal
capability, the system can tolerate a higher particulate concentration than
most existing filters.
The biofilter is a very shallow granular activated carbon adsorber. The
microbes are inoculated onto the carbon surface, which usually takes about 2
weeks during start-up in order to ensure a sufficient microbial population.
Bed-depth of ~2 feet and EBCT of 1 to 4 seconds are normally required to
ensure the confinement of the mass transfer zone of the contaminant within the
bed. The actual dimensions may vary depending upon the feed concentration and
its biodegradability.
An automatic nutrient delivery system is part of the advanced engineering
package of the pilot unit. The feed stream contaminants provide the primary
organic carbon source for biogrowth, however, inorganic nutrients are also
required for optimal growth. A unique nutrient delivery system with
recirculation has been implemented to provide proper inorganic nutrients with
no secondary pollution. Nitrogen and phosphate are mixed into a solution and
automatically delivered to the biofilter at preset intervals. The system is
flexible in supplementing additional organic nutrients to (1) maintain the
biofilter during an extended downtime, or (2) enhance degradation for
recalcitrant contaminants via co-metabolism.
25
-------
Figure 14. Pilot-Scale BioScrubber Unit
vAjuf^fsr.A''•/*'<••<^**^^?&
-------
Figure 15. Bio-Scrubber Field Unit Flow Diagram
Backwash Exit
and upflow
Gas Eat
Backwash Catch
Bucket
Gas Booster
Compressor
Backwash Inlet
or Dowuflow Gas
Exit
Hecirculation
FHimp
Castomer Field
Gaj Stream
27
-------
The bio-mass removal device is one of the unique features of the developed
biofilter, which differentiates ours from existing biofilters. The device
introduces aqueous backwashing via a high pressure nozzle to discharge the
excess bio-mass periodically out of the biofilter. The discharge is further
filtered before discharging into the local sewage treatment system. Due to
the extreme efficiency of the bio-degradation, no additional post-treatment of
the aqueous discharge is expected.
In summary, the developed pilot testing unit offers a unique engineering
design to make biological treatment a simple and reliable operation, which is
often perceived as an extensive "baby-sitting" operation in the waste
treatment community. In addition, the utilization of an activated medium as a
bio-filter media enhances the bio-degradation efficiency, which minimizes
filter dimensions and reduces capital and operating costs.
VI. QUALITY ASSURANCE
Toluene concentration was determined by gas chromatography. The
methodology, calibration curve and method of detection limit are detailed
below:
A . Calibration Curve
The following data were obtained by injecting fixed volumes of certified
standard gas mixtures (Matheson Gas Products) (see Appendix A) into an HP 5995
GC/MS equipped with an HP 18965A FID detector.
TABLE 5 Calibration of Standard Gas Mixtures of Toluene
Data
Sample
1 . 0 ppm
Peak Area
33107
35106
34774
Mean Area
34329
% RSO
3.1
10.0 ppm
413830
415940
419240
416337
0.6
20.0 ppm
739740
756670
748300
748236
1.1
Linear regression of these three points yields a correlation coefficient of 0.9974.
With an area rejection value of 0.0, the regression yields a correlation of 0.9982.
28
-------
Conditions Used
1. Column: 6' x 1/8" SS packed with 5% SP 1200, 1.75% Bentone 34 on
100/200 Supelcoport.
2. Oven Temperature Program: 75'C isothermal
3 . Injection Port Temperature: 200"C
4. FID Temperature: 200'C
5. Carrier Gas: Helium at 20 scc/min
6. Injection Volume: 500 /il
Calibration standards consisted of 1.0, 10.0 and 20.0 ppm toluene in
hydrocarbon free air. Calibration standards were purchased for purity and all
standards were verified by the USEPA audit standards when available. Accuracy
is certified by the supplier to ± 5% of the specific component. Concentration
tolerance is ± 20%. Calibration was verified on a daily basis through the
analysis of a 10 ppm standard. If the determined concentration differed from
the previous calibration value by more than 5%, the source of error was
detected, corrected and noted.
In April, 1992, the analysis was switched to a Varian (Model 3400) Gas
Chromatograph equipped with a signal integrator compatible with a flame
ionization detector (FID) output. The Varian oven is capable of maintaining
an isothermal 75"C +1.0 and an injection port temperature of 200'C. 500 /il
samples were extracted in a 1000 /il (application range 0.1-40 ppm) gas tight
syringe were injected onto 60/80 Carbopack B, 1% SP-1000 column with a
detection limit of 0.1 ppm. Compressed gases running through the system
consisted of zero grade air and ultra-high purity helium and hydrogen.
Column conditioning was conducted by heating the column for a minimum of 18
hours at 25-50"C below the maximum packing temperature with carrier flow and
vented to atmosphere. After cooling the column to ambient temperature, the
carrier flow was shut off. After 15 minutes, the column was connected to the
detector inlet with suitable fittings and checked for leaks.
After conditioning, the hydrogen and air flow were adjusted according to the
manufacturer's specifications for the column. Column temperature and carrier
flow were adjusted to the desired operating levels and the FID was ignited
according to the manufacturers instructions. The baseline output was
monitored with a recording device until the signal drift was equilibrated.
The toluene peak appears typically between 3.55 to 3.60 minutes.
Calibration curves can be generated from measured area or height of standard
peaks obtained from a strip chart recorder or direct integrator quantitation
In our case, response factors for calibration standards were entered into a
Varian (model 4270, Figure 4) integrator for direct quantitation of the
to1uene samp1es.
29
-------
The syringe was filled using a septum bag. Samples were injected and
analyzed according to the calibration curve. If duplicate sample data was
required, the sample was not taken directly from the septum port, but
collected in a Tedlar bag.
B Sampling
A 500/il gas-tight syringe was purged with air first and the microvalve at
the end of the syringe was then closed. The syringe was inserted through
the septum of the 1.0 ppm standard Tedlar bag. The valve on the syringe was
opened. The syringe was then filled and purged three times. The syringe was
filled with the sample a fourth time and the valve was closed. The needle was
inserted into the port of the GC. The microvalve was reopened and the sample
was injected. This process was repeated three times for the 1 ppm standard as
well as the 10 and 20 ppm standards.
C. Method Detection Limit
The method detection limit (MDL) is defined as the value obtained when the
standard deviation of the instrument noise is factored by three and divided by
the slope of the calibration curve. The slope of the calibration curve is
easily obtained. With "modern" integration equipment, this slope is usually
defined as the ratio of the peak area and the concentration. Unfortunately,
it is difficult to correlate an absolute noise level (/iv) with this calculated
slope. In addition, the document defines the instrument noise as being
"adjacent in retention time" to the analyte peak. In practice, this value is
difficult to obtain with the configured integration equipment. In an effort
to overcome these difficulties, the following procedures were employed to
obtain compatible instrument noise and calibration slope values.
Instrument Noise
The average instrument noise was plotted prior to injection at very low
attenuation (full scale = 32 /iv; see plot A of Figure 16).
The instrument noise "adjacent in retention time" was determined by
subtracting absolute detector output values obtained during calibration runs
from the stable detector output prior to the injections. Eighteen (18) /1V
values were averaged over three runs (see plots C, D, and E of Figure 15). B
is a plot without an injection at the same attenuation.
Calibration Slope
Three calibration runs were made in peak height mode using a 10 ppm
calibration standard (see plots C, D, and E) . The peak heights of the three
toluene peaks were averaged and converted to an absolute /iV value. The slope
of the line was calculated from this average /ZV value.
30
-------
Figure 16: Plots for Determining Method of Detection Limit (MDL)
* is.
USF ZERO ,
ZERO 591
LIST* LIST
PEAK
J96
orr 2-t
ST»
on a>
« «
LIST' LIST
CflPflCITY:
BJN » 13
MKKFILE I0< 8
WKKFILE («HE-.
«T HEIGHT TYPE AR/HT HEIGHT%
0.42 13246 0 P8 8.892 26.971
2.32 181 BV 1.823 ».3S9
3.53 35685 P8 8.194 72.SSI
TOT*.
IU. FACTOR l.MME+M
WH I 15
W8XFIU 10' 3
«T HEIGHT TYPE M/H7
•" 14|*?Df8 ».1M
283 f>V J.J9S
3.53
TOTAL HO(T» -51117
M.
9.132
15; ii
is. i.a.
iv i.»
IJ, I 5
3 K
SU« I 14
WXXFILE 10= 8
WQTILE
HEIGHT*
*T HEIGHT TYPt flB/HT HEIGHT
• .42 13827 O 88 ».185 27.}*
a.33 227 W «.a«8 ».<3
3.55 35423 n «.154 71.5?
ML FACTOR" 1
49477
M
31
-------
GC Conditions
1. Column: 6' x 1/8" SS packed with 5% SP 1200, 1.75% Bentone 34 on 100/200
Supelcoport.
2 .Oven Temperature Program: 75'C isothermal
3 . Injection Port Temperature: 200"C
4 . FID Temperature: 200'C
5 . Carrier Gas: Helium at 20 scc/min
6. Injection Volume: 500 /il
Data
1. Average instrument noise (from plot A) = 16 /iV
2. "Adjacent" instrument noise from plots C, D, and E)
Run Pre-injection fuv) During run
C 500
440
460
510
510
540
530
540
540
540
450
460
460
460
470
480
490
500
500
500
500
10
10
40
30
40
40
40
10
20
20
20
10
20
30
40
40
40
40
Average A = 28
6n-l = 13
3 x 6n-l = 39
32
-------
Calibration slope
Run
D
E
Average height
6n-l
Relative 6n-l
Average height (/iV) =
Slope (Mv/mg/1)
Method detection limit fMDL)
MDL
Peak heisht (counts)
36666
35685
35423
35925 counts
655 counts
0.018
-35925 counts x 0.129 /iV/COUnt*
4635 flV
4635 /iv/10 me/1
463.5
= 3 x 6n-l / slope
39 /w/463.5 /iv/mg/1
0.084 ig/1
-33
-------
VII. REFERENCES
1. H. L. Bohn, and R. K. Bohn, "Soil Bed Scrubbing of Fugitive Gas
Releases", I. Environ. Sci. Health. A21(6). 561-569 (1986).
2. I. H. Prokop, and K. L. Bohn, "Soil Bed System for Control of Rendering
Plant Odors", J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.. 35. 1332, (1985).
3. R. D. Pomeroy, "Controlling Sewage Plant Odors", Consulting Ensineer.
20, 101, (1963)
4 S. Anso, "Odor Control of Waste Water Treatment Plants", .T. Water
Pollut. Control Fed.. 52, 906, (1980).
5. D. A. Carlson, and C. P. Leiser, "Soil Beds for the Control of Sewage
Odors", J. Water Pollution Control Assoc.. 38, 829, (1966).
6. D. H. Kampbell, J. T. Wilson, and H. W. Read, "Removal of Volatile
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons in a Soil Bioreactor", .1. Air Pollut. Control
Assoc.. 37, 1236, (1987).
7 M. H. Ebinger, H. L. Bohn, and R. W. Puls, "Propane Removal from
Propane-Air Mixtures by Soil Beds", .T. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.. 37,
12, 1486-1489, (1987).
8. H. L. Bohn, "Soil and Compost Filters of Maloderant Gases". J. Air
Po11ut. Contro1 Assoc.. 25, 953, (1975).
9. G. Leson and A. M. Winer, "Biofiltration: An Innovative Air Pollution
Control Technology for VOC Emissions", Air and Waste Management Assoc.
41 (8): 1045-1054 (1991-L
10. G. E. Speitel, Jr., F. A. DiGiano, "The bioregeneration of GAC used to
Treat Micropollutants", T. Am. Water Works Assoc.. 79(1). 64-73, (1987)
11. J. G. Goeddertz, M. R. Matsumoto, A. S. Weber, "Offline Bioregeneration
of Granular Activated Carbon". 1. Environ. Enq.. 114(5). 1063-76.
34
-------
APPENDIX A
DATA COLLECTED
-35
-------
Code
10PPMSTD
10PPMSTD
10PPMSTD
BLANK
1 PPMSTD
1 PPMSTD
10PPMSTD
lOPPMSTD
10PPMSTD
1 PPMSTD
1 PPMSTD
1 PPMSTD
BLANK
A(CPORT)
C(CPORT)
INFA4/14
INFC4/14
10PPM
10PPM
10PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
INFA4/15
INFB4/15
INFC4/15
INFD4/15
INFE4/15
A(APOR"n
C(APORT)
B(APORD
B(BPORT)
DfAPORT)
D(BPOFm
BLANK
E/INF
B{CPORT)
D(CPORT)
1 PPMSTD
1 PPMSTD
1 PPMSTD
'lOPPMSTD
10PPMSTD
10PPMSTD
B/INF
C/1NF
D/INF
E/INF
A/INF
A(APORT)
C(APORT)
B(APORT)
B(BPORT)
D(APORT^
D(BPORT)
Description
i
Standard
Standard
Standard
Blank
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Blank
Col A. C Port
Col C. C Port
nfluent. Col A
nfluent, Col C
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
nfluent, Col A
nfluent, Col B
Influent, Col C
Influent. Col D
Influent. Col E
Col A, A Port
Col C. A Port
Col B. A Port
Col B, B Port
Col DLA Port
Col D, B Port
Blank
Col Ejjnfluent
Col B, C Port
Col D, C Port
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col B. Influent
Col C, Influent
Col D, Influent
Col Et Influent
Col A. Influent
Col A. A Port
Col C. A Port
Col B, A Port
Col B. B Port
Col D. A Port
Col D, B Port
Date
13-Apr-92
13-Apr-92
13-Apr-92
13-Apr-92
13-Aor-92
13-Apr-92
J4-Aor-92
14-Apr-92
14-Apr-92
14-Apr-92
14-Aor-92
14-AJ3T-92
14-Aor-92
14-Apr-92
14-Aor-92
14-Apr-92
14-Apr-92
15-Aor-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-j\pr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Aor-92
15-Aor-92
15-Aor-92
15-Aor-92
15-Aor-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Apr-92
15-Aor-92
15-Aor-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
i 20-Apr-92
20-Aor-92
20-Apr-92
20-Aor-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
20-Apr-92
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
9.2405
9.1889
9.0212
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
10.0000
9.1149
9.5990
0.8549'
0.7795
0.8294
0.0000
0.0856
0.0000
14.9470
19.9480
9.9174
9.9057
9.4514
0.8555
0.8191
0.7995
10.2860
26.8990
36.0050
33.2100
0.7040
0.1407
0.0000
4.5640
7.0751
40.132d
146.6800
0.3861
0.7129
71.5290
381.96001
0.8159
0.7775
0.7599
9.4093
9.6124
9.4784
18.5710
8.9199
9.7241
8.8132
20.3290
0.0000
0.0000
6.2683
6.1374
14.4520
38.6860
-------
Code
llAfORTL_|
ilBPclniT
E(CPORT)
DfCPQRT)
8£CPORJL_
TOPPMSTDJ
1^P£MSTD4
ll)P?MSTJrT
20PPMSTD
20PPMSTD
20PPMSTD
BLANK
A/INF
8/1 NF
C/1NF
fi/'NF
E/1NF
ACAPQflpi^
CiAPORH_
SCAPQRT)
B(BPORT)
D(APORT)
D(BPORT)
E(APGRT)
E(BPORT)
E(CPQRl)
DCCPGFCI)
8{CPQF01
Blank
10PPMSTD
10PPMSTO
IQPPMSTD
A/iNF
B/INF
C/SNF
10PPMSTD
1GPPMSTD
10PPMSTO
BLANK
BLANK
BLANK
ioppy
10PPM
AINF
CINF
AjAPGRT)
A(BPQRT)
CIAPGRT)
CUPORIL.,
AiNF
AINF
AiNF
CINF
CiNF
CiNF
Description
ol E, A Port
j°yLJL£Pft
ol E, C Port
^oi 0, C Port
*Q\ B, C Port
tandard
tandard
standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Blank
Coi A. Infhiflnt
Col B, innuent
Coi_£jjn||34enj__^^
Col D, Influent
Col E, Influent
CjtA^A Port
Col C, A Port
Coi B, A Port
Coi B, A Port
CoJUJjuAJ^ft; ;
Coi D, B Port
Col E, A Port
Coi E, 8 Port
Coi E, C Port
Coi E, C Port
Coi B, C Port
Blank
^Standard
Standard
Standard
Col A^ influent
Col B, influent
Col C, Influent
Standard
Standard
Standard
iiffljL__
Blank
8ianfc_
Standard
Standard
Col Aj Influent
Cot C, Influent
Col A, A Port
Coi A, B Port
Col C, A Port
!MJLJLE°JL_
Coi A, Influent
JMJLJEfiMSS^^
Coi A, Influent
Coi CJJjTfluenj__^^
Coi JS^JnjIujflt
Got C, influent
Date
2Q-A£_f-92
--~^llAPr"9"ll
_J£1ApjjL9||
20^£f-92
__2ilAJ3f-92
-^-M^BUl
— 23^AilJl
™_JllMJLl2
__JLllApr-92
23-A_£r2fir
23-AjgMr_19_2
—ii!^^^
23-Apr-92
23iMllii
__23_1A£jj:92
23-ADJTJ2
^J-JLM?-®2
23-Apr-92
^—-E^^^rJJ
23-_ApjrIf2
23-Apr-92
23-Apr-92
23-A_pr-9'a
"" 23-Apr-92
23-Apr-92
23-Apr-92
23-Apr-92
23-Apr-92
. 29-Apr-92
29-Apr-92
29^pj^£2
__HlML-92
__£9^A£r-92
29-Apx-92
29-Apr-92
30-Apjj:92
30-Apr-92
30-Apr-92
30-Apr-92
4-May-92
S-May-92
___-UlStl2
5-May-92
5-Mav-92
S-May-92
5-May-92
5-May-92
__UdUt£_
5-Mai-9
5-MM-9
5-May-9
SiMMJL
™__JiMM-9
5-Ma^9_
5-May-9
Analysis
(Toluene, pptn)
2.9836
18.8160
138.2400
356.5300
58.8510
9.3798
9.7551
9.7785
18.2110
18,2080
17.3140
0.0000
27.3450
28.5090
15.8540
30.0700
12.7070
0.0000
0.0000
8.6619
7.4386
16,0100
76,3080
2,4400
10.8140
1 18.0100
348.2600
46.3540
0,0000
9.5510
9,1458
8.9574
0.1748
0.1407
0.0000
9.9145
9.5583
9,6836
0.0000
0.0000
o.oooq,
10.2240
9.9114
16,4980
18.5270
0.6684
0.0000
0.3242
0 0000
14.8460
14,8740
14.0330
11.4070
I 11 6410
1 ' 1 2"*SQ
-------
Code
10PPM
1QPPM
10PPM
20PPM
20PPM
AiNF
"AWF
CiNF
C1NF
DiNF
OINF
HNF
E1NF
BINF
81NF
A|APOR1Q_
CfAPGRT)
BfAPORT)
B£BlPgRT)
01APORTI
DiBPGFfTl
ECAPQOTI
E{BPORT)
E{CPORT)
D(CPORT)
B(CPGRT|
BLANK
10PPM
1QPPM
toppy
BLANK
CINF
CINF
BINF
BiNF
DINF
DINF
BNF
BNF
AINF
AINF
SUWK
10PPM
10PPM
10PPM
AINF
AINF
CINF
CINF
DINF
OINF
HNF
BNF
BINF
BINF
Description
Standard
Standard
§li!l^J^______ . ;
Standard ':-
Standard _
Col__A^nfl£eni^
Col A, .Influent
Col C, influent
Col C, Influent 1
Col 0, influent :
ColjDj Influent
Col E, Influent
Co£J1JnJuent___
Col B, • .influent
Coi B, .influent
!MJkJLEM_
Col C, A Port
Col 8, A Port
CoLJLB Port
SMMjJtJPQrt^. — —
Col D, 8 Port
Col EjjC Port
Col E, B Port
Col Ej_C Port
Col D, C Port
C^JJLJlJjQrt
Blank ___
Standard
Standard ~~^
Standard ;mm_r __ ,
Blank
Col C Influent
Col C Influent
Col B Influent
Col 8 Influent
Col D Influent
Col 0 Influent
Col E Influent
Col E Influent
CoS A Influent
Col A Influent
Blank
Standard
Standard
Col A lnflu$nt
Col A Influent
Col C Influent
Col C Influent
Col 0 Influent
Col 0 influent
Col E Influent
Cot E influent
Jcol B influent
Col 8 Influent
Date
—JJJdltiM
1 1J^aiJJ:
^iMlXiiff
1LMllJJ
n-May-92!
11-Mayj92'
l1-May-92'
11-May-92!
11'MliJ2|
1 1-Mayj92
11-Ma^92:
H-May-92'
—LkMMii?'
__J±MilJl
11-_MaxL92-
_J_144a^i2
__!±iday-92
__JLLMS3L2S
—liiMlMl
11'May-92
li-May-92
tl-May-92
11-Ma^9_2
H-May-92
11-May-92
-JiMatll
HiMMJil
l3-Mayj92
l3-May-92
13-May-92
13i4aill
13-May-92
13-Mayj.92
l3-Mayj92
13-May-92
1^MaxJi2
13-yay-92
13-Mai-92
13-May-92
13-May-92
13-Mayj^(2
14-_May-92
14-May-92
14-May-92
14-May-92
14-yav,-92
14-Mai-92
14-May-92
___Jj4^MaY^9_2
___U^MHif2
1-±Mllli2
14-M^y^92
14-May-92
14-May-92
- i4-May-92
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
9.3028
8,9092
8.9012
16.0450
17,0650
13.9870
14.3040
4,8154 -
4.9299
5.0239
5.0492
4.9287
4.7102
*. 13.1490
13.2380
0.0000
0.0000
1,4138
1.8042
2.0983
8.2579
0.2375
0.4896
79.5880
216.5400
4.8168
0.0000
9.3149
8,9068
9.2705
0.0000
i.0279
8.9544
12.3670
12.8970
9.3203
9.2198
9,1023
9.2019
13,0560
13,0200
0,0000
9.3310
8.9369
8.8609
10.8820
11,3940
Ufsl
9.0491
I 9,7807
9.1013
8.9273'
9.287?
13.7610
12,9850
38
-------
Code
A(APOR~Q_ <
Cj[AjfQRT}___J
BLANK
10PPM7Z3
10PPM
10PPM
CINF |
DINF
E1NF
BINF
BLANK
10PPM
•* f\ Q CSIljl
10PPM
BINF
CINF
DINF
EINF
AINF
CjAPQRTl_
A|APOF£Q__
B(APORT)
O / D D/"^C3"T"\
CH C?* •«/»* « /
_D(APC^T}__
QiBPORTl
E|APORT|__
E|BPORT)'
i^^Sn_
D(CPORT1_
BiCPGRT)
qcpofin
A(CPORT)
•4 OOmJj
1PPM
ippy
10PPM
20PPM
AIN/PIO
AIN/PID
10PPMSTD
BLANK
1PPMSTD
1PPMSTD
1PPMSTD
1PPMSTD
Aj!NF)___
SM£L___
C|INF)~~
D|lNF}
EHMEL-_—
_E|APORT}__
Ej8PQPf[L_
D|APORT}_
S^TORT}__
C(APORT)
Description
Sol A, A Port
Dot C, A Port
Blank
Standard <
Standard
Standard
Col C Influent ________i
Col D Influent
Col E Influent
Col B Influent ~ ZHI
Blank
Standard " ^J
Standard
Standard ~ ~~ """"IZI
Col B Influent
Col C Influent
Col D Influent
Col E Influent
Col A Influent
Col C, A Port
CoJA-APort^
Col B, A Port
Q2L§^^9!l~~«^^—-~~—-^~-
Col 0, A Port
CoUJIjJort
Col E, A Port
Coi E, B^Port
Col E, C Port
Col D, C Port
Col 8, C Port
Coic,cpQni___
Col A, C Port
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Blank
Standard ,
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col AT Influent
Col B.,... Influent
Col ^Q^JnfluejTt,
Col Dj Influent
Col E, Influent
Col E, A Port
Col Ej B Port
Col Dt A Port
Ssl^A-S-ESfl--— — -— —
Coi C, A Port
Date
14-May_-92j
^Jj444aj^92j
18-Ma^iS
___j_^ya^<-92'
1 8-May-92_
1 8-M_a^-92
IS^M^^Sg
18-Msy-92;
___Jj|^Ma£jJ2
___^8-MaY--92
19"MltM
1 9^a^92_
^9-MayjJ2
™_lSiMM^2
__J^MMliI
194.^3^92
jj_.yay-92
19-May_^92
19-_Maj^-92
19-May-92
19-May-92
__lEiMMiEi
19-May-92
l9-May-92
19-May_-92
19-M_ay-92
19-May-92
lliM^tM
19-May-92
_lliM§!St£i
_LiiMMi£i
19j-M^-92
28-May-92
28
-------
Code
CiBPORJL.
IIAfWT)
BfBPORJL^
SAPO^™J
AJBPgRT}
1PPMSTD
1PPMSTD
IPPMSTOn
1 PPMSTD
BUNK
BUNK
A^CPORTl
A(BPORT)
ACAPORTL.
B(GPQRT3
BUNK
BiBPORT}
B{APORT)
C|cpgmi_
CJBPGFfQ
CiAPO_RT}_
DCCPGFm
DiBPO§31_
D(APORT)
E-EFF
lilPQffQ
E(APQRT)
BNF
BNF
DINF
DINF
CINF
CINF
BINF
BINF
BINF
___ _,
AtNF
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
BLANK
SlNF
BINF
"BINF
AINF
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
IUNK
8(CPOFtn
8JBPORT}_
HAfQBIL^
BINF
A(CPQRT)
Description
Col C, B Port
Col 8, A Port, , ' 1
Col 8, B Port.. ___i
QglAAf2!L-_.
Col A, 8 Port
Standard
Sfind'ird ]
Standard
Standard
Blank
Blank
Col A^C Port J
Col A, B Port
CqLAj A Port
Col 8, C Port j
Blank
Col Br B Port
Col 8, A Port
Col C, C Port
Col C, B Port
Col C, A Port
Col D, C Port
Col D, 8 Port
Col D, A Port
C_pl E Effluent
£§LJLJLfP.rt
Col E, A Port
Col E Influent
Col E Influent
CJ3JJ3 Influent
Col 0 Influent
Col C Influent
Col C influent
Col B influent
Col B Influent
Coi B influent
Col A Influent
"Co! A Influent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Hank
tCol B Influent
Col 8 Influent
Col B Influent
Col A Influent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Blank
:C2LIL£LE2.rt
CjOJLEsit
Col 8fc
-------
Code
AIBPGRTL_
A|APOWD~|
AINF ~j
AiNF__^Zj
AiNf^ZZZj
A1NF
AINF
AiNF "1
1PPM
1PPM 1
1 PPM
BLANK
BUNK 1
1PfM__j
1PPMZIZJ
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPW[___J
AINF
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
ippy
1PPM
1PPM
AINF
A(APORT1_
AiBPOffQ^
A|CFC)RT}
A(APGRT)
BINF
f(ARDRT}_
B(BPORT)
BfiCPORT)
B{CPORT1__
A(APQRT)
AiBPORT}
MPGRD
A(CPO«T)
CSNF
CIAPQRT)
S^5H
C{CPOFH)
DINF
tppy
DINF
D|AfOOT}__
BLANK
iiCPORTL
iSEQSEL.
EfAPQRT)
felNF
D(Cro«T)
Description
Coi A, B Port I
Col A, AJPort^^^^^^ m¥>- _
Col A Influent "t
Col A Influent
Coi A Influent
Col A influent
Col A Influent ]
Col A influent _J
Standard
Standard
Standard
Blank ;
Blank '
Standard '•
Standard I
Standard i
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col A influent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard • |
Col A influent
Co( A. A Port
Col A, 8 Port
Col A, C Port
Col A, A Port
Coi B Influent
CoJ 8, A Port
Col 8, 8 Port
Col B± C Port
Col B, C Port
Col A, A Port
Coi A, 8 Port
Col A, 8 Port
Coi A, C Port
Coi C influent
Col A, A Port
Coi C, 8 Port
Col C, C Port
Col D Influent
Standard
Col D Influent
Col D, A Port
Blank
Coi E» C Port
Col_^_J_f§rt___
Cot E, A Port
•Coi E Influent
Coi D, C Port
Date
2-JuI-92!
2-JuI-92l
2-Jul-92
2-Jul-§2[
2-Jui-92[
2-Jui-92
2-Jul-92
2-Jul-92:
2-Jul-92
2-Jui-92
2-Jul-92
2-JUI-92
— ig- -j^—^i
S-Jul-92'
8-Jui-92
8-Jul-92
8-Ju!-92
8-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
8-Jul-92.
8-Jui-92
8-Jyii|2i
[ 8-Jut-92
^_™__ldJiJ2|
S-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
S-Jul^tlj
S-Jul"1!!
8-juT¥f
S-Jul-92
S-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
8-Jul-S2
S-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
S-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
S-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
S-Jul-92
S-Jul-92
8-Juf-92
8-Juf-92
8-Jul-92
S-Jul-92
8-Jul-92
IO-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-SS
L_Li^lJihll
14-Jut-9<
I l4-Jui-9-
Analysis
(Toluene, ppni)
0,4433
1.0765
1 2 0390
17,3890'
23,5010
29.6770
0.0000
Q.QGG01
1,1446
0.0000
1.1201
0.0000
0,0000
0,0.000
1,0539
1,0656
0,0000
1 .0602
1,0440
0,0000
0,0000
0.0000
, 0.0000
0,0000
o.booo
[ZZZZZZE^z
p-.....^
L^_ 10.4090
p— 0.0000
0,7654
0,56.08
0.4804
L__ 8.8946
0.5461
0.0000
0.0000
0,0000
L 0.3854
0.0000
LZZZI-Jiiiii
0.3633
15.4340
1.0119
0.2917
0.0000
0.0000
1 ,2444
15.4720
EZZZZZIJIP
0.0000
0,0000
0.0000'
0.0000
15,9810
1 0.0000
-------
1
Code
D|BTORTL_
DIAPQRTL_
OiNF
AiCPORT|__
A£BPOR1Q_
AIAPORTL
AiNF
C(CPORT}_
CiBPOiRT}_
CiAPORTl_
CiNF
^iCPORT]
iHPOEQ
B{APGR7)
8INF
1PPM
8INF
BiNF
BiNF
BINF
BINF
BiNF
1PPM
JfSSHZJ
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
BUNK
HNF
EJAPORT)
ISFJQFO
E-EFF
D1NF
D(APQRT)
DCBPOFCD
oe=F
1PPM
CINF
CfAPORH
CIBPORT)
CEFF
BiNF
B(BPGRT)
B-EFF
AINF
AjAPOR^.
AiBPpRT}
A-EFF .
1PPM
B'LANK
ippy
i ..
1PPM '
Description
Col 0, B Port
Col D, A Port
Col 0 Influent
Col A, C Port
Col A, B Port
Col A, A Port
Col A Influent
Col C, C Port
Col C, B Port
QsLSiAfort
CjjjJLJnjIuent
Col B, C Port
OoJ_li_8_Pojt__
Col 8, A Port
Col B Influent
Standard
Col B Influent
Col 8 Influent
Col B Influent
Col B Influent
Col B influent
Col I influent
Standard
Standard
Standard l
Standard
Standard
Blank
Col E Influent
Col EjJLEort
Col E, 8 Port
Col E Effluent
Col 0 Influent
Col Oj_A Port
Col D, B Port
Col 0 Effluent
StanciarJ
Col C Influent
Col Cj A Port
kMiLJJ?M__
Csi jC_ Effluent
Col B Influent
Col BJ_A_Port
Col B, 8 Port
Col B Effluent
Col A Influent
Col A, A Port
Col A, B Port
Col A Effluent
Standard
Blank
Standard
Standard
Standard
Date
14-Jul-92
14-^Jihi2|
14-7uT5!j
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-3ui-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-JUI-92
i 14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-JUI-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
14-Jul-92
21-JiujjJl
ai-TuTiz
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul":92
21-Jul-92
21-Jui-92
21-Jul-92
21-JUJ-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-JUJ-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-Jul-92
21-JU1-92
29-Jui-9£
_HiJui-92
29-Jul-9S
f 29-Jul-92
Analysts
(Toluene, ppm)
0.0000
0.2362
15,3890
0,0000
0.0000
0,0000
3.3762
Q.oolfd
- 0,0000
0,2149
15.05401
0.0000
0.0000
0,0000
3,1551
1.1605
3,1732
3,2495
3.0927
7.2615
6,2898
0,0000
1.1828
1.1565
0,0000
0.0000
0.0000
, 0,0000
0,0000
1 7.565$
0,3061
0,0000
0,0000
17.3990
0,3801
0,0000
0.0000
1.1420
17.8290.
0,0000
0,0000
0.0000
3.6831
0,0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.8084
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0814
0,0000
G,QG015
0,0000
I 1,0643
43-
-------
Code
A/1NF
A/ApWf
A/BPORT
A/CPORT
8/INF
8/APORT~l
B/8PORT
8/CPORT
C/INF
C/APORT
C/BPORT
C/CPORT
D/1NF
O/APORT"!
d/fePORT
D/CPORT
E/INF
E/APORT :
E/BPQRT
E/CPORT
ippy
1PPM
ippy
1PPM
E/iNF
E/APORT
S/BPORT
&€£F
O/INF
D/APORT
0/BPORT
D/EFF
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1Ppy
E/INF
E/APORT
EXPORT
&1FF
O/INF
D/APORT
D/BPORT
0/EFF
C/iNF
C/APORT
C/BPORT
C/EFF
B/INF
1/APORT
fi'/APbRT
Description
Col A influent f
Col A, A Port
Col A, 8 Port ~l
Coi A, C Port
Col 8 influent
Coi 8, A Port Jj
Col B, 8 Port
Coi B,C Port
Col C influent
Col C, A Port
Coi C, B Port
Col C, C Port
Coi 0 influent
Coi 0, A Port
Col D, 8 Port
Col 0, C Port
Col E influent
Coi E, A Port
Coi E, B Port
Col £s C Port
Standard
Standard
Standard , _
Standard
Col Ilhfluent
Col E, A Port ,
Col EJ3 Port
Coi E Effluent
Col D Influent
Col D, A Port
CoJ 0, B Port
Col 'D Effluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard /,
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col E Influent
Coi E, X Port
Col £, 8 Port
Col E Effluent
Col 0 influent
CoLJLAJ^SlL- ___>___-_-__.
Col 0, B Port
Col D Effluent
Col C Influent
Col CLA Port
Col C, B Port
Col C Effluent
Col B Influent
coiJLJ PQ&-~.
ICoTB. A Port
Date
Zi-Jui^
29-Jul-92i
29-JUI-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-JUI-92
_J9-Jul-92
29-Jul-9|f
. 29-Ju!-92
29-Jui-92
29-Jui-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
29-Jul-92
L^__JlAjiS*92:
4-Aug-92
4-Aug-92
f____±lA_uS-92
__±MSll2
4-Aus-92
4-Aug-92
__£1Au£L92
L_J^Auj-92
4-Aug-92
4-Aug-92
4-Aug-92
5-Ay^^
5-Aug-92
5-Aujj^g
5-Aug-92
S-Aug-92
5-AUJL-92
5-Aug-92
5-Aug-92
5-Aug-92
5-Aug-92
5-Aufl:92
5-Aug-92
5-Aug-i2
5-Ayc-92
5-Aug-92
5-Aut^
S-Au^fl
5-Aug-92
5iAug-92
5-Au£-92
__J_:Ajj-92
5-Aug-92
i • 5"-Aug-i2
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
7.9088
0,0000
0,0000
0,0000
7,9286
0,0000
0.0000
0.0000
18,4070
0,0000
0.0000
0.0000
16.0290
0,0000
0,0000
0,0000
16.0900
0.0000
_^___y
0,0000
1.1010
1.1650
1,1540
1,1700
15,9120
0.2270
0.0000
0,0000
15.8390
0,1810
H™™™^ 0.0000
0.0000
I 0.7656'
0.5310
0,9900
0.5800
0.4720
1.0780
1,0880
1 .069,0
17.1310
0.4650
0,1020
O.OOOu
16.1690
0.4430
0,0000
0.0000
17.7510
0,6050
0.0000
0.0000
8.3150
0.9800
r~~~~~Q,Q6i0
-------
Code
B/APORT
B/BPORT
B/EFF
A^EZZII
A/APORT
A/BPORT
A/EFF
1PPM __J
1PPM
1PPM
A/TNF
A/APORT
A/SPORT
A/EFF
B/INF
B/APORT
8/BPORT
B/iFF
1PPM
1PPM
JPPM__i
1PPM
B/INF
8/APORT
8/APORT
B/BPORT
8/EFF
A/INF
A/APORT
A/BPORT
A/EFF
fPPM
1PPM
E/iNF
S/APQRT
E/BPORT
E/EEF
D/1NF
D/APORT
DEPORT
D/EFF
G/tNF
C/APORT •
'C/BPORT
C/EFF
1PPM
1PPM
.1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
B/INF
B/APORT
B/BPGRT
8/EFF
A/INF
Description
Col B^A Port ;
Col BjJIJ^QrL _____4
Col 8 Effluent
Col A Influent . 33
Col A. A Port
Coi Aj, B Port
Coi A Effluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Coi A influent
Col A, A Port
Col A, B Port
Col A Effluent
Coi 8 influent __J
CfiLifcAJEprt
Coi B, B Port
Col 8 Effluent
'standaFd
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col B Influent
Col 8, A Port I
Co! 8, A Port
Col B, B Port
Coi B Effluent
Col A influent
Col A, A Port
Col A, B Port
Col A Effluent
Standard
Standard
CoLJ-Jnffuent
CjiJLA Port
Col £„ ft.Pqrt .
Col E Effluent
CoLfi. influent
CoJJL-A Pot
Col D. B Port
Col D Effluent
Coi C Influent
Coi C, A Port
Col C, B Port
Col C Effluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col B Influent
Coniijy^ort
Coj B, 9 Port
Col B Effluent
Col A Influent
Date
_Jh6jiSJl2!
5-Auj.-92:
5"AjJ£i|2
""s-AjSmi
-JbAufiJH-
5*AM§ii2
s^Ajjaji
J^A_ua-92
2^ufl-S2
_-JLAugJ)2
7-Aug-92
: 7-Aug-92
7-Aug*92
7'AS4Sti2
7-AUQ-92
7'jM3^2
^A^q-92
7-Aug-92
10-Aug-92
10-Ayg-92
10-Aug-92
10-Au£:|2
10-Aug-92
10-Aua-92
io-Aua-i2
10-Aufl-92
10-Aufl-92
10-Aua-92
10-Ayq-92
10-Ayg-92
10-Aufli92
ll-Aufl-92
H-Aufl-92
11-Aufl-92
11-Aufl-92
11-Aua-92
11-Aua-92
11-Aug-i^
11-Aua-92
11-AUO-92
11-AUCJ-92
1 1 -Ajj§_-02
11-Aug-92
1 1 -Aujt.92
11-AUQ-92
11-Aug-92
1 1 -Ay^-92
11-Aufl-92
11-Augji92
11-Aua-92
11-Aug-92
11-Aufl-92
1 1-Ayg-92
11-Aufl-92
11-Aug*92
Analysis
(Toluene, ppra)
O.OS30
0,0000
0.0000
7.3990
0.2180
0.0000
0.0000
0.9930
1.0790
0,9850
7.9490
0.7050
0.8840
0.3690
7.7740
0.4450
0.1510
0.0000
1.1920
1.1030
. _J»sOOM
1.1750
9,8480
0.0000
0.1150
0.0000
0.0000
9.3380
0.6490'
0.2100
0.0000
0.9620
1 .0270
11JL125
0.2140
0.0720
0.0000
18.5600
0.1860
0.0000
0,0000
19.3620
0,1770
0.0000
0.0000.
1.2550
0.5420
1,2070,
1,1880.
1,2440
10,5570
0.0000
0.0000
_____JJI£fi
| 10.61 50
44
-------
Code
A/APORJ 1
A/8PORT
A/EFF
1PPM ~T
1PPM T
1PPM
E/INF
A/INF
A^pjQRT^
A/B.PORT
A/EFF
ippy
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
1PPM
E/iNF
E/APORT
EVBPQRT
eEFF
ippy
'1PPM
ippy
E/INF _,
i/APORT
E/BPOFfL_
£££L~_~i
D/INF
0/APGRT
D/8PORT
D/EFF
C/INF
1PPM
ippy
1PPM
A/APGRT
1PPM
1PPM
ippy
E/INF
E/APORT
BBPORT
&€FF
D/iNF
D/APORT
0/BPORT
D/EF.F,
C/INF
MffifflL.
C/BPG-RT
C/EFF
B/1NF
8/APORT
B/8PGRT
B/EFF
Description
Sol A, A Port 1
MAJLPG'rt _ I
Zol A Effluent ~T
Standard
Standard
StandjjrcJ
3ol E influent
3ol A Influent :
^iAA^£L_-- — :
CoykA£2E-»-___ ;
Col A Effluent i
Standard 1
Standard ^_______™_J
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col E influent ~|
Col E. A Port
CoLI^PorL—-—
Col E Effluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col E influent
Col E, A Port
QsLJLILESil^--^^
Col E Effluent _4
Col 0 influent
Col 0, A Port
c<40Aj^ojt_________^
Coi. D Effluent
Col C Influsnt
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col A, A Port
Standard
Standard
sStandard
Col E Influent
iCof ET A Port
:Coi E, 8" Port
ICol E Effluent
Col 0 Influent
Col D, A Port
jCol D»J Port
Coi 0 Effluent
Col C Influent
Col 6, A Port
£oiiLIJ!orl_______^^
'Col C Effluent
'Cj3lJ8_JW!^
MJiAfJ!!—
nCb"l B. B Port
Coi 8 Effluent
1
Date
1
1 1-A_U5_-92|
1 1-AU3-92
1 1-Ajiai92:
r7-_Ajj£-92f
17-Aus-92
17-AU2J2
U-Aug^sa
17-Aua^ilf
—JliMaiii.
1IlAJJS-92'
17-Aufl^a
19*AM£iii
19-Au£l|2
IS-AjJflJig
19-Aug^SJ
la-Ajjs^z
19-Auaii2
t9-Aun-92
_j_9^AuM^2
19-A(iiiii
20-AU&92
ZOjvAjjg-ga
_JJ_IAu£1|2
L_— JJLAtffitl?
sFAuiZll
-—IJjAiiSLlI
siiMa^S
,. 21-Aua^l
21~AusH|2
__il^JiStl2
__^,,—_|
___JJj£ujgtl2
24-AUJL2S
2JbMstl2
24-AUS-92
24-Aug-92
25-4UQ-92
M^MSLli
25-AutJ:2
--JSlMSli?
25-Aujgt92
25-Aug-92
25-Auai|2
25-Aug-92
25-Atffl-92
25-Aufii92
l__15,-AJiSil2
25-Aujt92
25-Aug-92
' 25-Au£^|
-—JJlMl^
__M^MS^
__2jI-AH!ltJ
25-Aug-i5
26-Aug-iI
Analysis
(Toluene, pprn]
0.1910
0,0890
0,0000
1.2500
1,2480
1.1 84Q.
12.5820
1£,6040
0.3490
•' 0.0880,
0.0000
1,2140
1.2260
1.2750
1.1760
1,2110
12,8370
0,0000
0,0000
0,0000
1,2820
1,1840
1,1130
13.0650
0.1480
0,0000
0.0000
12.4420
l____ o.oooo
i$ 0.0000
0.0000
14,8220
1,2550
1,0810
1.2540
0,4060,
1.196ft
nz . ™j-disfl
1.1980
ET 12.4430
0.2810
0,0000
, 0.0000
, 11.3140
r*~*" 0.1840
:^— ____M§50.
t : 0.0000
I ,f 12,3780
t- . • 0,2210
!; 0.0000
- ,^^^^^$^1
^_,_^ 4^0930'
>: 1 .3940
»: 0,0000
| ' 0.0000
-------
Code
A/INF :
IMPORT ;
A/8 PORT
1PPM
1PPM
'1PPM
E/tNF
E/APQRT ;
E/APORT
EXPORT
E/EFF
D/INF
0/APORT
D/EFF
C/INF
C/APORT
C/BPORT 1
C/|FF__J
B/INF ,
B/APORT
BfflUEQBT_,
BVEFF
A/iNF
A/APORT
A/BPORT
1 PPM
1 PPM
A/INF
§7fNF
CXiNF
DMNF
E\INf
A\INF
1PPM
1 PPM
A\iNF
A\ A PORT
A\8 PORT
A\EFF
BMNF
B\A PORT
BVB PORT
9\EFF
1 PPM
1 PPM
"1 PPM
A\iNF
A\PORT A
A\PORT 8
A\Eff
B\INF
BNPORT A
8\PORT 8
8\EFF
C\iNF
Description
CpJ A influent
Col A, A Port
Col A, 8 Port 1
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col £ Influent
Col E, A Port
QfiULAfart
QsL^^±^!l^^——^^~—
Coi E Effluent
Col D influent
Col D, A Port
^SlD^B^enl_________
Coi C Influent
Col C, A Port
Col C, 8 Port
Col C EffluenF
Col B Influent
Col B, A Port
Col B, B Port
Col 8 Effluent
Col A Inflyent
Col A, A Port
ColAj[PGrt
Standard
Standard
COI A Influent
Col. B Influant
Col, C Influent
Col. D Influent
Col E influent
Col A influent
Standard
Standard
Cot A Influent
Col A Port A
Col A, Port B"
Cfii A^EJfluent
Col 8, Influent
Col B, Port a
Col B, Port B
Col B, Effluent
Sllndard
Standard
Standard
Col. A, Influent
Col. A, Port A
Col. AJ^ort 8
Cof, A, Effluent
CjiL_JJJnflu£nt_
CjLlLfojt A
Col, B, Port B
Col, 8, Effluent
Col. C, Influent
Date
26-Aufl192
26-Aug-92
26-Ajj£-92
27-Au£;M
27-Aus-92
__27^jjQ^M
2LAuaH,
JIiMaJl
27-Ayaiil,
^-JjUm-iMr
27jAjj3-92
27-Aus^
27-Au£j2l
—IZlMSL:92
27-Auq-92
27-AMJ32
UiMsiii
27'AM^I
__-lIiMSLl2
ZT-Auj^SI
2IiAujl|2
27-Aua^2
27-Augh91
27-Auiti.2
27-AUJL-92
___JhSaojj|2
a-Sieja
9-Ssp-92
L—liSegja
9-Ssp-92
|__9-S§£:92
_llSefiJ2
"^Sefiill
h IO-Ssp-92
10it§M2
L_J±lii^2
j__ 10-S«p-92
10-Sep-92
10-Sep-92
ijiSefiiti
10-Sepj^2
10-Sep-92
10-Sep-92
22-Sep-92
Ig^Sfjgja
22^30^9 2
__22_^§fiJ2
__22IS§£^2
22-Sep-92
22-Sip-i2
22-Sep-92
22-SegJ^
221S§£^2
_JliS§p-92
22-Sep-9S
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
10,1210
0,0730
0,0000
1 ,2470
1.2190
1.1830'
12.0830
0.0000
0,0000
0,0000
0.0000
10.2600
0.2940
0.0000
6.8670
0.1170
O.Q840
0,0000
9.5670
-_^_i^MS,
0.0000
0.0000
9.7820
0.0000
0.0530
0.82
1.0230
9.5130
47.4200
1 .4220
48.5800
47.5800
13.3200,
1.0830
1.0440
15.0100
0.6190
0.0680
0.0000
29.3600
0.7890
0.0690
0.0000
0.7970
Q'.SOGQ
0.8000
3.8350
0.0000
0.0000
0,0000
12.2650
0.2880
0.0000
0.0000
* 4.54 9 1
"4k
-------
Code
C\PORT A
C\PORT B
1 PPM
i PPf£__I
1PPM™
CXEff
D\INP
D\PORT A
0\PORT 8
0\EFf
E\iNF
EXPORT A
EXPORTS"!
E\EFF
1 PPM
1 PPM
AXINF
A\PORT A
A\PORT B
AXEFF
BXINF
B\PORT A
B\PORT 8
B\EFF
C\iNF
CVPORT A
C\PORT B
C\S=F
DXINF
D\PORT A
D\PORT 8
1 PPM
1 PPM
D\EFF
EMNF
EXPORT A
EXPORTS
EXEFF
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 PPM
AXINF
AVPORT A
AXPORT 8
AXEFf
BXINF
B\ PORT A
EXPORT b
B\EFF
CMNF
CXPORT A
CYPGRT 8
QEFF
OMNF
D\ PORT \
Description
QsL££2£LA L
CoI.C, POrt 8 [
Standard t
Standard
Standard
Col. C, effluent
QfiJiJLJMyMi
Col_DL_Port A 311
Col D.ijPort 8
Col.D, Effluent
Coi. EJnfluent
Col. E, Port A
Col. E, Port B
C^J^^ffluern, ___i__J
Standard
Standard
ColJXjJnfluent
Col, A, Port A
Col. A, Port B
ColJ^ Effluent
Col, B, Influent
Col, B, Port A
CoU3Jf2!yL«— , _-__
&&JLJfflyen.t _
CkiiJSjJn^^
CoJ, C, Port A
Col. C, Port B
Col. C, effluent ; ,
Col._DJJnflj!ignt_
Col. DL Port A
Standard
Standard
Coi. 0, Effluent
Pot E, Influjnt^
Coi. E, Port A
fcol, E, Port b
jCoL E, Effluent
Standard
Standard
^tendird
ICol. A, Influent
Cot. A^PortJL^
iCol. A, Port B
Col, A, Effluent
Col. 8, influent
Col BijPort a
Col B, Port 8
ColJ^JEjflugjrt
Col C, Influent
Col, Cj. Port A
Col C, Port 8
Col. C, Effluent
.Col, D, influent
|Col C, Port A
Dale
22-Sep-92[
22-Sep-92l
23-Sefii.92
MZIejLlil
23-S^Hl
__2_31S§£192
2ii§iBi92
23-Se£j*2
__23^Se£-92
23-Se£^2
HiS6£i92
23-§l£li2
23ISe£192
_il^iS-iI[
__JllilfclI
__JiLi!P-92
JllSep-92
_-15lSiP-92
301S8£If2
__Ml§lfcJl
30-Sep-92
30-Sep-92
30-Sep-92
30-Sep-92
30-Sep-92
__JJH>§fi^2
30-Sep-92
_15^S§fili2
3QISe£:92
30-S§£i92
30-S8P-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
1-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-OCI-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-92
9-Oct-9S
9-Oct-9
9-Oct-9
9-Oct-i
9-Oct-S
i-Oct-i
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0,1650
0.0910
0,7680
0.6310
0,8350
0,0000
13.7360
0.2700'
0,0000
0.0000
14,9500
0,2160
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.9370
4.9400
0.1190
0.1090
0.0000
10.2700
0.1640
0.0000
0.0000
I 16.5500
0.2360
0.0000
0.0000
16.0500
0.4990
i , o~oooo"
0.9360
0.8540
0.0000
16.5500
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0100
0.9560
1.0280
14.4700
0.0000
0.0000
0.1160
10.0800
2.9200
0.0000
o.o oW
16.8300
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
17.0300
3 """*" ~~THFoGO
-------
Code
0\PORT 8 'A
D\EFF (
E\INF 1
BPGRT A Hi
EXPORT B i<
E\£FF (
1 PPM
1 PPm
1 PPM
X_NF"
^ORT_A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
8\iNF
B\PORT A
8\PORT B
B\EFF
CMNF
C\PORT A
C\PORT B
C\EFF
DXINF
0\PORT A
DEPORT 8
D\EFF
E\INF
^P^RJ^—1
E\PORT8
!\EFf
1 PPm
1 PPM
1 PPM
A\iNF .
A\PORT A
A\PORT B
A\EFF
BMNF
B\PQRT, A
B\ PORT.B
B\EFF ' ,
CMNF
CVPORTA
C\PORT8
C\EFF
DMNF
0\PORT A
DVPORT B
D\EFF ,
E\!NF
BPORT A
EXPORTS
E\EFF
A\lNF
A\PORT A
AVPORT B
Description
Sol. 0, Port B
Sol. D, Effluent
Sol. E^ Influent
Sol. E, Port A -"T
Sol; e. Port B 1
Sol. E, Effluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col. A, influent
ColJ^ Port A
Col. a. Port 8
CQjJL Effluent
Col. 8, influent
Col BJPonj\ _HZIJ
Coi. 8, Port 8
Col, B, Effluent '
Coj^jCjJnflj^ ___]
Coi. C, Port a
Col. C, PortS
Col C, Effluent
Co|.OT.D, influent
Coi. D^Port A
Coi. D, Port B „
C"ofTD, Effluent
^T^InlueinF ZZZH
CoOTPort A
Col E, Port 8
Col, E, Effluent
1tPPM Stsndard
1 PPM Standard
1 PPM Standaard
Col, A, Influent
Col. A, Port A
Col A, Port 8
Co< A, Effluent
Col 8, Influent
Coi 8, Port A
Col B, Port 8
Coi B, Effluent
Col Ct Influent
Col C, Port a
Col C, Port 8
Co» C, Effluent
Col D. Influent
CoU3J?Qrt A
jCol 0, Port B
CojJIJEffluent
Col E, Influent
SJO§^
£oLij^lJ-_j»__
JoL^jlluent
Cjj^A^_Jgj|y.ent
. CjJ^PojrtA-.--^^
^_..__...
Date
9-Oct-92i
___9-Oct-92i
9-Oct-92[
9-bct-92[
9-Oct-92f
9-Oct-92|
14-0ct-92i
14^0cFHr
U-Ocf-92!
14-bctJ2|
14-OCI-92!
14-Oct-92!
14-Oct-92!
14-0ct-92i
14-0ct-92i
14-OcTl2|
14-Oct-92i
14-Oct-92l
Uj-OctJJl
14-0ct-92j
14-Oct-92:
L 14-0ct-92j
14-Oct-92
14-Oct-92:
14-Oct-92
14-Oct-92
14-Oct-92
14-Oct-92
14-OCI-92
t5-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15*Oct-92
15-Oct-92
tS-Oct-92
1S-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15^0ct-92
15-.Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
15-Oct-92
f 15-Oct-92
I jJ-Gci-iS
: 15-Oct-9!
i . 15-Oct-9S
1S-Oct-9S
i 15-Oct-9!
i 19-Oct-9!
r^j^ojct^i
"i • 19-Oct-9!
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0.0000
0.0000
17.7700
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0200
1.0920
1 .0500
16.3000
2.6300
0.0000
0.0000
9.9100
0.2260
0.0000
0.0000
15.9500
G,QQQO
0.0000
0.0000
12.2200
J_____0.1600
0.0000
0.0000
, , 16.4500
L_— — — -PJS22fi
L 57t340
0.0000
1.0300
1.1200
1.1400
1 7.6200
2.5200
0,0000
i_ o.oooo
__J1____J 0,2400
3,3400
i . . ' 0.0000
I „ , 0,0000
! 14.9200
i i 0.0000
. , '0.0000
i • 0.0000
15.9500
! 0.0000
! " . 0.0000
: 0.0000
___^__Llillio.
,__ ^
0.0000
T~ Q.OOCSO
•• Ju__-™JJJSOJ,
|___»_^__lzi§0
j
-------
Code
A\EFF 1
B\INF jn
BNPORT A :
B\PORT 8 :
B\Eff
CMNF 1
C\PORT A
C\PQRT B
qEFF__J
DMEEZZZI
D\PORT A
0\PORT B
1 PPm
1 PPM
1 PPM
EMNF
BPQRT A
E\PORT8
BEFF _|
Description
3ol A, Effluent I
3ol 8^ Influent i
3oi 8,, Port A ™ "1
Col B^PortJ _,
ColB^ Effluent ~~T
Col C influent
coijO5iJ~A ' II
Coi C1_PortJ________^^
Col OEluent ~ ' *™~T
Co! 0, Influent i
G^^SsiLlL^—^-—— j
Col 0, Port B !
1 PPM Standard j«fi^§ak___l
1 PPM Standard _______ J
1 PPM Standard ;
CotE, Influent ,
Coi E. Port A !
C^EJ>fojlB______^^
Col EL Efflutnt ____I___J
1 PPWStaridarJpPrn " :
:U=fM_~__JlJ^^
1 PPM 11 PPM Standard ;
1 PPM
A\iNF
AXPORT A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
8\iNF
iL£P2Lj|§Qd3M_ ______ _ __
C_oi A, Influent
poi A,* Port A
Col j!kJP2!tJL__^^
Col A, Effluent __,
[Col 8, Influent
'MSMA^^^^MA^^————-—.
B\PORT 8 ICof 8, Port 8
B\£ff
CMNF
C\PORT A
C\PORT 8
C\EFF
D\ INF
D\PORT A
iCoi B, Effluent
Col C» Influent
CofJSJ^ortjL^^
^
Col C, Effluent
fCj3JJ2jLJDJ^^
coT^rpQ5jC^r~7~~~~"
D\PQRT B jCol 0, Port B
D\EFF feol DL Effluent
1 PPM Standard
1 PPM [standard
Date
19-OctjJ2j
19-0ct-92i
19-OCI-92F
19-Oct-92i
19-OctJJJ
19-Oct2M.
ig-octTaf
19-Oct-92!
___^>._g.
19-0ct-92i
19-0ct-92i
19-Oct-92:
19-0ct-92l
19-Oct-92!
19-0ct-92i
19-Oct-92!
19-OCI-92:
19-0ct-92l
19*Oct-92:
21-OCI-92!
21-Oct-92
21-0ct-92j
21-Oct-92!
,____21<5ct-t2'
.. 21-<5cF¥2l
21-OCI-92
21-Oct-92
L__21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
LHlI;PiE?2
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
21-Oct-92
i 23-Oct-92
|_23^CtJ2
1 PPM Standard l« 23-Oct-92
A\INF jCoi A, Influent
A\PORT A {Col A, Port A
A\FORT B
A\EFf
BMNF
B\PORT A
B\PORT 8
8\EFF
C\iNF
C\PORT A
C\PORT 8
D\INF
8 • •
ISuOfQHfiQ*
jCol^B^JnJuent
~poL8^ Port A
MJ*±2£L&_________
jCol..'B'. ...Effluent
£sLljJsiMM___-- -_—_—.
Eol^^ortJ__________
'ColCj^P^^,^^^^,^^^^,
23-Oct-92
23-Oct-92
I "2^0^1-92
23-Oct-92
j 23-Oct-iS
23-0
-------
Code
DVPORT A (
DVPORT 8
D\EFF__J^J
E\1NF
EXPORT A
BPORT 8
BEFF
1 PPM
1 PPM _^J
1 PPM
A\iNF
A\PORT A
AVPORTjl
'A\EFF
BM.NF
8\PORT A
B\PORT B
8\EFt___J
C\INf
C\PORT A
C\PORT 8
C\EFF
D\iNF
0\PORT A
DVPORT 8
D\EFF
1 PPM .. -
1 PPM
1 PPM I
AXINF
AVPORT A
A\PORTJ___J
A\EFF
BMNF
BNPORT A
B\PORf B
BVEFF
CMNF
C\PORT A
CAPGKTB
C\EFF
D\!NF
DVPORT A
D\PO«T 8
D\EFF
E\INF
BPORT A
EVPORTB
E\EFf
1 PPM
1 PPm
1 PPM
A\INF
AVPORT A
AIPQRT B
Description
Cot D, Port A
Col d, Port 8 1
SgijdLEffluent 2j
Col E, Influent :
Col E, Port A
ColJEjJIJprt 8 I
Col 6, Effluent __j
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col A, Influent
QMA_f£rt A
Col A, Port 8
Col a, Effluent
Col Bjjnfluent
Cof B, Port A
Col B, Port 8
SsLljL_illM§aL___- J
CoJ CjJiifluent,^,^^^
Coi C, Port A
Col C, Port 8
Col C, Effluent
£M_2iJl!flMiI!L___
CoLS*^Ti-A_>____
Col D. Port B
Col D, Effluent
Standard
Standard H
Standard
Col AiJnfluent
Col A, Port A
Col A, PortJL
Coi A, Effluent
Col B, Influent
Col B, Port A
Col Bj. Port 8
Col B, Effluent
Col C, Influent
Col C, Port A
{Col C, Port 8
Col C, Effluent
Coi 0, Influent
Col D, Port A
Col 0, Port 8
Col D, Effluent
Col E, Influent
Col E, Port A
Col E» Port B
Col E, Effluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col. At influent
Col A, Port A
Col A, Port 8
Date
23-Oct-92:
23-dcV92!
23-O"ct-92l
23-Gct-92
23-Oct-M
23-Oct~t2S
23-Oct-92
27-Oct-92:
2"*7-Oct-92"
27-Oct-92:
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92;
' 27-Oct-92:
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92-
r~T7^5cF~92
27-Oct-92
27-Oct-92
, 27-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-dct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-OCI-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Qct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
29-Oct-92
2-NO¥-92
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2"^Wo¥^H
1 ^~n^-^
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0,0000
• • o.oooo
0.0000
5.1900
0.0000
0,0000
0,0000
0,7900
0.8800
0,8600
12.7300
0.8900
0.0000
0,1100
9.8500
2.6500
0.1430
0.0000
14.5200
0.1780
0,0790
0.0000
_. 14,3*100
, 0.4900
0,0000
0.0000
0,9500
1.0190
0.9400
13.3700
0.2700
i 0,3500
,0.0000
9.6100
0,3700
0.2200
__JJfififi
10.6200
0.3800
0.0000
0.0000
14.6800
0.1200
0.2600
0.0000
14.2200
0.0870
0.3400
0.0000
0.8800
0.9200
1.0000
12.3100
5,6100'
{~~~*~~™~TolTo
-------
Code
A\EFF I
B\INF Jj
B\PORT A j
B\PQRJJLJ
BXEFF j
CXInf I
CNPORT A 1
C\PORT 8
C\EFF
DXINF
0\PORT A
D\PORT B
D\EFF
EXINF
EXPORT A
EXPORT B
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 PPM
AXINF
A\PORT A
A\PORf 8
A\EFF___j
BXINF
EXPORT A
If-p—fT"1
iXEFF
C\JNF
C\PORT A
CXPGRT 3
OMNF
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 PPM
DNPGRT A
D\PQF?TB
D\EFF
EXJNF
E\PORTA
BPORTB
B£FF
1 ppy
1 PPM
1 PPM
A\INF
A\PORT A
A\PORT B
A\EFF
BXINF
BXPORT A
EXPORT B
BXEFF
CAiNF
Description
Col Au Effluent \
Co! B, Influent :
OolJ^fort A J
Col Bjjfort B
Coi 8j,^ffluent_____
Col C, Influent
Coi C, Port A |
Coi C, Port 8
Col C, Effluent ]
COI 0, Influent
CoiD, Port A
Col D, Port 8 __
Coi D, Effluent
Col E, Influent
C£LliJMjL__ J
Coi E, Port 8
Siaandard
Standard
Standard
Standard ~~1
Coi A, Influent ___
Co! A.Port A
Col A, Port 8
Col A, Effluent '
£oLBjJnfluent , i
Coi 8, Port A
jJMJiJrMJ
Col 8, Effluent
Col C, Infuent
Col C, Port A
Col C, Port 8
Coi C, Effluent
Col D,lnfluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col 0, Port A
Col 0, Port B
Co< D, Effluent
Col E, Influent
Col E, Port A
Col E, Port 8
Coi E, Effluent
standard
standard
standard
Col A, Influent
|Cb'i A, Port A
Col A, Port 8
JCoJ A^ Effluent
Col b, Influent
Coi 8, Port A
Col B, Port B
JMJLJI^
tcol "C, Influent
Date
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2-NOV-92
_,__ 2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
a-Nov-gjT
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2-NOV-92
2-ISIOV-92
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
2-Nov-92
IO-Nov-92
tO-Nov-92
1Q-NOV-92
10-NOV-92
lO-Nbv-92
^_ 10-NOV-92
10-NOV-92
LO-Nov-92
10-Nov-92
10-NOV-92
10-Nov-92
IO-Hov-92
IO-Nov-92
______^
10-Nov-92
IO-Nov-92
1G-N0V-92
tO-Nov-92
IO-Nov-92
10-NOV-92
10-NOV-92
10-NOV-92
IO-Nov-92
IO-Nov-92
10-Nov-92
IO-Mov-92
1Q-NGV-92
12-Nov-92
12-NOV-92
12-NOV-92
12-NOV-92
12-N0V-92
12-N0V-92
12-NOV-92
12-NOV-92
12-NOV-92
12-N0V-92
12-Nov-9S
I 1 2-Mov-iS
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0.4130
9,6300
*, 0,8 500
0,0900
0,0000
15.7500
0.7600
0,0900
0,0800
15.0200
0.2000
0.0000
0,0000
15.8000
0.3400
0.0000
0.8600
' 0.7700
0.7800
1.1300
13.9800
6,4800
0.0000
0.0810
8.4000
1,3700
0.0000
0.0000
I. 16.6800
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
16.3700
0.9700
L_- 0.97C50
, 1.0200
0.0000
; ' . 0,0000
0.0000
,. 15.3800
0.2190
4. 0.0000
r , o.oooo
0.9200
', 0.9200
0.9200
13,7100
___x__§-5QG0
: ,. 0.0000.
L .' 0,0000
|_____1MI21
! 3.2500
!:! '~~~~OTOOO?
ii 0,0000
5r~~~~~~~"^T300Q
51
-------
Code
C\PORT A :
C\PORT 8 :
CXEFF" ;
D\INF
DXPQRT A i
0\PORT 8 ;
D\EFF 23
E\INF :
EXPORT A =
EXPORT 8 ;
ilfL_Zj
MWf____^
A\PORT A :
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
8\iNF
B\PORT A
EXPORT 8
BXEFF
C\INF
C\PORT A
C\PORT S
M^EZIj
A\PORT A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
B\INF
BXPORT A 1
S£QSUL_
8\EFF
CUNF
CXPORT A
CXPORT B
CXEFF
0\iNF 1
OXPORXA^
DXPGRT3
0\EFF
E\iNF
EXPORT A
EXPORTS
E\EFF
AXINF
AXPORT A
AXPORT B
AXEFF
AXINF
AXPORT A
AXPORT 8
AXEFF
8X1 NF
8XPORT A
§\ PORT 8
BXEFF
C\INF
Description
Col C, Port A
Col C, Port 8
Col C, Effluent — j
Do! 0A Influent
Col 6, Port A" t
Col 0, Port 8
Col 0, Effluent
Col E, !nf!uent
Col E, Port A
Col E, Port B t
Col E, Effluent ~~ 11
Coj^A^Jnjfjuen t
Col A, Port A
Col AjJfWj^
Col A, Effluent
Col 8, Influent
Col 8, Port A
Col B, Port 8 ~1
CoJJIJIffiuent
Col C^Jnfluent
Col C, Port A
Col c. Port 8
CoLA_r«Tfluint 1
Col A, Port A
Col A, Port 8
Col A, Effluent
Col 8, influent
goi^fo^A^ '
CoLJLEPjt B
,Co!JL Effluent
Col C^Jnfluent
Col C, Port A
Col c. Port B
SoLCJ_Ejmjent_,
CjolD,_Jnfliient
jCpJLD^Poft A
Col D, Port 8
Coi D, Effluent
ColE, Influent
Col E, Port A
.Cot E, Port 8
!Coi E, Effluent
Col A^ Influent
Col A, Port A
ColA, Port B
^M-A4-SffiM§Dl__
Col A, influent
Co PGrt A
Col A, Port 3
Col A, Effluent
fejLJLJjM!^^
Col 8, Port A
CoJ_ii_fMJ___
Cd^lrifTOenr^
Col C, Influent}
Date
12-NOV-92:
12-"?Jov^92l
12-Nov-92!
"l2-Nov-92j
12-Nov-92:
12-Nov-92
12-Nov-92
12-Nov-92'
12-Nov-92'
U-Nov-92
12-Nov-92:
16-NOV-92J
_i_JJ-jMpw1|2|
16-Nov-92
16-Nov-92
16-NOV-92
18-Nov-92
__JJJ^ov:9_i
16-Nov-92
16-Nov-92
1S-Nov-i2
18-Nov-92
IS-Nov-92
__lilM5±l9?i
18-NOV-92
18-Nov-92
; 18-Nov-92
13-NOV-32
18-Nov-92
f 18-Nov-92
tS-Nov-92
18-Nov-92
18-Nov-92
18-Nov-92
19-NOV-92
19-Nov-92
19-Nov-92
19-Nov-92
1i-Nov-92
1§-Nov-92
; 1 S-Nov-92
19-NOV-92
30-Nov-92
30-Nov-92
SO-Nov-92
: 30-NOV-92
i l-Oec-92
! 1-09C-92
I l-Dec-92
! 1-D8C-9S
I 1 -Dec-iS
l-Oec-9<
1-Oec-iS
L___li£2£jJ
l i-Oec-9~!
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0.2070
0.0000
__^ 0.0000
16,3700
0,0000
0,0000
0,0000
16.0300
0.0000
, 0.0000
0.0000
13.6600
u 5.6100
0.2100
0.1430
10.2600
1.7700
0.0000
0.0000
_____i_lLJL200
0,1400
0.4200
11.5200
, 4,3800
, 0.0000
,_ s .O'.OOOO
8.7300
1_____:.__M1M
0.0000
0,0000
9.8400
____t_i_MtM
I _>_^__
/ 0,0000
13,2000
0.0880
0,0000
0,0000
13.7200
0.1340
Q.0900
0.0000
11.6600
I 4.1200
j 0.0990
,: 0.0000
12.0400
1 ' 3JOOO
:: o.oooo
t 0.0000
I : 8.2000
J: 4.8700
!: . 1 .3450
!: , 0.0000
f ^~ 12.7500
-------
Code
CNPORT A
C\ PORT B
C\£FT^J
0\INF
D\PORT A
D\PORT 8
D\EFF
E \INF
E\PORT A
EXPORT B
BEFF
J_£fifP
Lfi£DL_«
1_2E!H_
A\iNF
A\PORT A
A\PORT B
BNINF
B\PORT A
B\ PORT 8
B\EFF
C\INF
C\£Q;RT A
QlEMlJLj
C\EFF
0\INJL__I
p^^rj-1
0\PORT 8
D\EFF
E \INF
BPORT A
BPORT 8
HSL»— __
AVINF
BN1NF
CMNF
DVINF
E\!NF
1 ppm
1 ppm
1 ppm
AMNF
A\PORT A
A\PORT B
A\EFF
8\!NF
8\PORT A
B\ PORT 8
8\EFF
CMNF
CAPQRf A
Description
Col C, Port A
Coi C, Port B
Col C, Effluent
Col 0, Influent
Coi 0, Port A
Col 0, Port 8
Coi D, Effuent
CO! E, influent
Col E, Port A
Cof E, PojtJL
Coi E, Effluent
standard
standard
standard
Col A_J__lnfluent
Coi A, Port A
Coi A, Port 8
Col 8, Influent
Col B, Port A ~~ ~ 1
Coi 8, Port 8
Col 8\ Effluent
goJ_CjJnJuer^^
QoLC^orlJl___ 1
iCgi^Pprt 8
Col C, Effluent
C^L£^nJuen|_____
'CoToTPort A
Col D, Port 8
Coi_Dj_mmnt
(COLE^Jnfluent
Coi E, Port A
Coi Ef Port 8
EM-Ii-iliMSDL
Col A, Influent
Coi 8, Influent
Coi C, influent
Col D, Influent
Col E, Influent
standard
standard
standard
Col A, influent
Co! A, Port A
CofA, Port 8
Coi A, Effluent}
Coi 8, influent
Coi 8, Port A
Col B, Port B
SMJLJiJfiMM
C^LC^Jnfluinti
Col C, Port A
Date
1-Oec-92!
— ldSiai31i
-^JZEliEIl
_|__|2|
l-Oec-92:
1 -Dec-9"l
1-Oec-92;
___J^OijCjjM
1-0ec-92i
l-Dec-92-'
1-D9C-92
7-06C-92
7-Oec-92:
7-Oec-92
7-Dec-92
7-Dec-92
7-DiC-92
_____g
7-Oec-92
T-Oec-92
8-D«C-92
8-Oec-92
8-C3ec-S2
8-Oec-92
^__,___
8-Dec-92
S-Oec-92
S-Dec-92
S-Oec-92
8-OSC-92
8-00C-92
S-Oec-92
8-Oec-92j
10-0ec-9z
tO-Dec-92
10-0ec-e2
10-D0C-92
IQ-Dec-92
14-DQC-92
14-D0C-92
14-DiC-92
14-OQC-92
14-fj«C-92
14-D6C-92
14-06C-92
*
14-D6C-92
14-Dec-92
L_l±5t§ii2
14--Dec-92
14-OiC-92
• 14-OSC-92
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm}
0.2000
0.0000
0.0000
14.2200
0,5380
0,5020
0.0000
14.8900
0,2850
0,0000
0,0000
1.0180
0.9480
0,9390
14.7100
1,0550
0,3140
17,8000
0,7600
0.3470
0.3730'
15,0800
0,6190
0.2070
0.2440
16.0300
0.3620
0.0000
0,0000
1 8,5770
«____JJ9§£
. . 0.1360
0.0000
13.3700
^0<32§Q
, 8.5050
18.4500
15.2500
: 0,8600
L____ 1 -0370
1.0130
16,8960
3.8700
0.0000
0.0000
I 10,1800
i 4.1600
.. J,J14G
:___m_-_»_jilMi
1 "~~~" ~ojoio
-------
Code
C\ PORTS i
C\EFF
DXiNF
0\PORT A i
OSPORfTj
D\£FF J
E \INF
EXPORT A
E\PORT B
EXEFF
1 ppm
1 ppm
Jjsgrn
AXINF
A\PORT A
A\PORT B
a\EFF
BMNF
-EXPORT A
8\ PORT 8
BXEFF
CXINF
C\PORT A
C\ PORT 8
C\EFF
D\iNF
0\PORT A
DVPORT B
DXEFF
E \JNF
EXPORT A
EXPORT B
IXEFF '
1 ppm -
1 ppm
1 ppm
AXIHF
AXPORT A
A\PORT B
A\EFF
B\iNF
BXPORT A
BNPORT B
81EFF
1 ppm
1 ppm
1 ppm
AXINF'
AVPORT A
AXEQRTB
AXEFF
BMNF
B\PORT A
BXPORT B
8XEFF
Description
Col C^Port 8 i
Gol C, Effluent
Sol O^J^fluenL— I
Col 0, Port A
Col 0, Port B
Col 0^ Effuent
COI E, Influent
Col E, Port A
Col E, Port B
Col E, Effluent
standard
standard ;
standard
CoLAa-JSfijMl!—-
Col A, Port A t
Col A, Port 8 ,
Col A, Effluent
Col 8, Influent
Col 8, Port A
Col 8, Port 8 i
Col B, Effluent /
Col C, Influent!
Col C, Port A
Col C, Port B
Col C, Effluent
Col D, Influent t
Col D, Port A _
Col D, Port 8
C^jJLJEffuent
C^LJLlGfiM^^
Dol E, Port A
Sol E? Port B
Col E, Effluent
standard
standard
standard
Col AT Infuent
Col A, Port A
Coi A, Port B
CoJ a, Effluent
Col B, Influent
Col B, Port A
Col B, Port A
Col B, Effluent*
standard
standard
standard f
Col A, Influent
CoLAjPOjt A
Col A, Port 8
Col a, Effluent
Col B,i influent
Coi 8, Port A
Col B, Port^A____^^
Col B, Effluent
Date
14-Oec-92
14-06C-92
14-06C-92
14-D0C-92
14-D6C-92
14-D8C-92
14-Dec-92
14-Dec-92
14-Dec-92
14-Oec-92
17-Oec-92
17-D6C-92
17-Dec-92
17-Dec-92
17-Dec-92
17-06C-92,
17-00C-92
17-Oec-92
17-Oec-92
17-Oec-92
17-06C-92
17-D0C-92
17-OSC-92
17-06C-92
17-00C-92
17-Oec-92
17-D8C-92
17-Dec-92
17-060-92
17-Oec-92
17-D6C-92
17-DSC-9Z
17-Oec-92
18-Oec-92
18-OSC-92
18-D0C-92
18-D6C-92
18-06C-92
18-0«C*92
18-OQC-92
18-Dec-92
18-D0C-92
18-D0C-92
18-OSC-92
21-D6C-92
21-D0C-92
21-D0C-92
21-06C-92
21-"bec-92
v 21-D0C-92
21-00C-92
21-00C-92
21-00C-92
21-00C-92
I 2~vt5ec:9~S
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0,0000
0,0000
14,4370,
OJ£0£
0.0000
0.0000
^•4?M
0.1310
0,1830
0.0000
0.7700
1,0000
1,0400
10.0880
1.4300
0.1140
0,0000
8.1500
3.7800
0.1300
0.0000
15.4700
0.2020
0.2030
0.0000
14.2500
oToooU
0.1300
0,0000
15.8600
0.3290
0.5200
0.0000
0.9800
, 0.8170
0.9480
1 7.6700
0.3000
0,6130
0,0150
15.9660
0.2460
0.1300
0.0000
1.0100
0.6140
1.1490
l_____JLiJpo
3.8900'
I ' "oTTHo
0.0000
8.3500
T ~~~ 4~oioo
i" 0.0000
4™ 0.0050
-------
Code
C\iNJL-_l
C\PORfTl
C\ PORTS ;
O___J
DMNFj^J
D\PORfT~^
DVPORT B "I
D\EFF
flliNF
EXPORT A
EXPORT B
BEF? |
AAiNF
A\PORT A
AAPOflTTj
A\EFF 1
BMNF
8\PORT A
BNPORT B
B\EFF
CMNF
CSPORT A
C\ PORT 8
C\EFF
1 pprn
1 ppm
1 ppm
A\INF
ANPORT A
A\PORT B
A\EFF
BMNF
EXPORT A
8\PORT 8
B\EFF
CMNF
C\PORT A
C\ PORT B
C\EFF
DMNF
0\PORTA
DXPQRT B
D\EFF
EMNF
E\PORTA
BPORTB
BEFF
1 ppm
1 ppm
J_ggm__
A\INF
AlPORT A
AXPQRT 8
A\EFF
BMNF
Description
Ooi C, inj§uj3njL_^^
Coi C, Port A I
Col C, Port 8
Coi C, Effluent T
CoJJDJLnfiuent _J,
Coi 0, Port A _j
Coi 0, Port 8 I
Coi D, Effuent ;
CjSjJEjJnJIuent !
Coi E, Port A ~ 1
5MJLEMJ1
£M^^fflM§GL_. :
Col A, Influent _
Col AjPort A
Coi A, Port B
Coi a, Effluent ~~ "4
Col B, Influent
Coi B, Port A
Co! B, Port A 1
Coi B, Efflu.enf
Coi C, Influent}
Col C, Port A
boL£, Port 8__ ^_
Coi C, Effluent
standard •••
standard
stancfarei
Col A,Jnfluent__^^
Coi A, Port A
Coi A, Port 8
Col a. Effluent , *
Coi 8,' Influent
Coi 8, Port A ;
Col B, Port A . ;
Col 8, Effluent
fcoi C, influent
Col C, Port A
Coi C, Port 8 . ,
GojJ^ Effluent
Col D, Influent . tt
Col D, Port A
Col D, Port 8 . . .
Co! D.Effluent
COI E, Influent
Col E, Port A
Col EJPprt B
Col E, Effluent
Standard
Standard
Standard
Col A4 Influent
Col A,Port A
CjlAJMJ—-.-^---,
CoLl1_EI!HML-.. __«__
Col B, influent
Date
21-0ec-92|
2l-Oec-92:
TT^Oec^ll
2l-6ec-92?
21-Dec-92:
21-Dec-92;
21-00C-92!
2iiDec^||
21-Oec-92=
21-0ec-92i
21-0ec-92i
---lliSiSiill
2Fo¥c^2!
22-Dec-92;
_22^D^-JM
22-Oec-92;
22-Oec-92;
22-Dec-92i
22-OecJ^
22-D6C-921
22-Dec-92:
22-D6C-92
2llD«c-9g
22-Dec-92
28-Dec-92
28-Dec-92
28-Oec-9^
1 28-Oec-92
28-Oec-92
28-Oec-92
28-08C-92
28-Oec-92
28-Oec-92
____
28-Dec-92
28-D0C-92
28-Oec-92
28-06C-92
28-000-92
28-Dec-92
.. 28-Dec-.92
28-D0C-92
,28-Dec-9,2
28-Dec-92
28-D0C-92
28-00C-92
1 ' 28-D0C-92
f 30^Bec-F2
l__ 30-Dec-92
30-Oec-92
30-Dec-9S
30-OSC-9S
30-Oec-92
j"
i 30-Dec-92
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
• 17,4300
0.1910
0.2540
0 0000
16.5600
0 3540
0,0000
0.0000
7.9600
0.1640
0.3380
7.84SO
1.4300
0,0000
0.0000
15.8200
0,0000
0.1370
0.0000
15,0000
0.0000
0,5910
0.0000
1 .0000
0.7430
i , 0.8910^
• 's
0.0000
0,0006"
. , , o.oootf
5.0570
.' 1,9700
. * •• O.OO'OO
„ . o.oooo
'13.8400
0.293d
\ OtOOOO
0.0000
14.4390
0.3620
i ,0.0,000
13-440Q
1.1940
:' .O.OOOQ,
L 0.0000
T~ 1.0990
1 1.0930
A-^_i2ZiS
!! 9J190'
5 1 2790
!i 0,0000
M™ Q.OOOO
> 7 83SC
-------
Code
8\PORT A ^
B\Port B ;
B\EF? _ J
C\iNF :
c\PORTTj
C\ PORT B
5W__J
D\iNF
t)\PORTA
D\PORT B
DVEFF
E \INF
BPORT A
EXPORTS
B£FF
1 PPM
1 PPM
A\iNF
A\PORT A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
B\iNF
§\PORT A
B\Port 8*71
B\EFF
C\iNF
C\PGRT A
C\ PORTS ,
C\EFF ^
0\INF
D\PORT A
D\PGRT 8
SH£_j
E MNF
BPORT A
BPORT 8
i\EFF
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 PPM
ANINF
A\PORT A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
B\INF
8\PORT A
meoiTB
B\EFF
CAINF
CAPORT A
C\ PORT B
C\EFF
OMNF
D\PORT A
g^p-^_~
Description
Col 8, Port A 1
Col 8, PortB
Col B, Effluent _1
Coi C, influent 1
Col C, Port A
Coi C, Port B
Coi C, Effluent 1
Cjj_DJ(Jr!flyent
Coi 0, Port A
Col D, Port B
Coi D.Emuent
COI E, influent j
Col E, Port A
Cot E, Port 8
Q3L^,,,^^SL^^—-. _
STANDARD
STANDARD
QoLdt-MlMSSt
Col A.Port A
Col A, Port B
Col a, Effluent
Col ,8, Influent
Coi 8, Port A
Col B, PortB
Col B, Effluent
Col C, Influent
got C, Port A
jCoy^JJ:^^ ,
Col C, Effluent
Col D, Influent
Col 0, Port A
Col D, Port B
Col D, Effluent
CO! I, Influent
Col E, Port, A
Col E, Port B .
Col E, Effluent
STANDARD
STANDARD
STANDARD •
bol A, Influent *
Col A.Port A '
[Col A, Port B
Col a. Effluent
Col B, Influent
Col B, Port A
:C^LJLJ3QrtB '
Col, 8, Effluent '
Col C, Influent
poTaPorTA
MsL£i^2!Li----^
Col C, Effluent
I^MM^^^——~-
MAf5£lA___— _
Coi 0', Port B
Dale
30-Dec-92;
30-Dec-92?
__^_j
30-Dec-92;
30-Dec-92!
30-D6C-92;
30-Dec-92i
30-D6C-92!
30-080-92
30-Dec-92:
_i_J_0-Oec-,92.
30-Oec-92
30-Oec-92
— 1§*1IEI1
30-Oec-92
4-Jan-92
4-Jan-92
4-3an-92
4-Jan-92
_— j- ,-«_j
u 4-Jtn-92
4-Jan-92
r_ _____
4-Jan-92
4-Jan-92
4-Jan-92
I 4-Jan-92
4-Jan-92
4-Jan-92
4-Jah-92
4-Jan-92
|~Tgar^II
4-Jan-92
4-Jan-92
4-Ja,n-92
1 4-Ja,n-92
i 4-Jan-92
i ' 6-Jan-93
1 6-Jan-93
! 6-Jan-93
i 6-Jan.-93
i S-Jan-93
6-Jan-93
8-Jan-93
: 6-Jan-93
; 6-Jan-93
i 6-Jan-i3
i " 6- Jan- 93
: 6-3ari-92
i 6-Jan-9a
8-Jan-9C
8-Jan-9:
6-Jah-9C
t~ 3-3an-9C
|" s^TarTf:
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
1.8390
0,6630
0,0000
15.1120
0,1920
0,1350
0,0000
14,8400
o.oooc?
0.0000
0,0000
15,0690
0.1790
,0,1180
0.0000
0,9350
0.9500
10,3260
0,3330
0.9350
0,0000
7,8080
4,8400
0.7880
0.0000
15.3200"
0,0000
0.0000;
o.oooo-
14.9300"
0.1480
0,0000
0,0000
14.3400
0.2050
'; 0,0000
0,0000
1,0200
0.9241
0.9990
9,0700
1,8100
0,0000
G.QMfl
8,9560
1,9680
• . 0.1710
0.0000
13.8200
0,4170
0.1480'
I ~~ 0.1740
14,5840
IZZZZ O.OOQO
jl '.COOC
-------
Code
D\EFF J
E \INF i<
BPORT A ;
E\PORT 8 :
E\EFF
TPPM |
If5M__l
Ml^£__l
MPORTTj
AIPQRT B 1
A\EFF I
BMNF
EXPORT A
B\PORT 8
8\EFF
C\!NF
CXPORT .A~J
C\ PORT B
C\EFF
fixjjjjF____ -
DNPORTAJ
0\PORT 8
D\EFF
EMNF
BPORT A
E\PORTB
SIFT"
iEfM—H
TPPM '
1 PPM
A\INF
A\PORT A
A\PORT B
A\EFF
B\JNF
8\PORT A
B\PORT B
B\EFF
C\INF
C\PORTA
C\ PORTS
C\EFF
D\(NF
D\PORT A
D\PORT 8
D\EFF
E MNF
E\PORT8
BEFF
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 ppy
A\INF
A\PORT A
Description
Zol D, Effluent ,
3OJJEL influent T
3ol Effort A J
Zo\ E, Port B I
CojJ;^ Effluent J
STANDARD J
STANDARD
Col A, influent ' ~T
Col A,Pojt_A___i_ J
Col A, Port B _
Col a, Effluent
Col B, influent __
Coi B, Port A
Col 8, PortB. ^ I
Col B, Effluent , I
Col C, Influent
Coi C, Port A ' ]
Col C, Port B .
Coi C, Effluenf
Col D, Influent
Col D, Port A ,
Col D, Port 8
Col D.Effluent
COI E, influent
Col E, Port A
Col E, Port B
Col E, Effluent
gTAWARD
STANDARD
STANDARD
Co! A, Influent
Coi A.Port A
Col A, Port' 8
Col a. Effluent
Col 8, Influent
Col B, Port A
Col B, PortB
Col 8, Effluent
ICoi C, Influent
Col C± Port A
Col C, Port B
Col C, Effluent
p3f D, Influent
Col D, Port A
Col D, POrt B
Col D, Effluent
COI I, influent
CjLEt_Port A
Col E, Port B
Col E, Effluent
STANDARD
STANDARD
:STANDARD
teol_^Jn§J§nt_^
JCoi A.Port A
I
Date
6-Jan-93
6-_J§jV?3,
6-lan^93[
6-JarH33[
6-Jan-93
Il-Jan^l^
1 l-Jan-93,
ll-Jan-93
l1-Jan-93
H-Jan-93
11-Jan-93l
ll-Jan-93
11-Jan-93
H-Jan-93
_-__^
n-Jan-Sf
ll-Jan-93
1l-Jan-93
—-JliiMilM
11-Jan-93
11-Jan-93
H-Jan-93'
11-Jan-93,
l1-Jan-93
. 11-Jan-93
L ll-Jan-93
H-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
u-Jan-93
l4-jan-93
" 14-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
l4-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
U-Jan-93
U-Jan-93
U-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
l4-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
l4-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
14-Jan-i3
14-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
14-Jan-93
l4-Jan-93
18-Jan-95
! 18-Jan-92
I 18-Jan-SC
I l8-Jan-95
1 . i8-Jan-9C
Analysis
(Toluene, pprn)
0.0000
14,4700
0,0000
0,0000
0,0000
0.9060
0,9090
7.7000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
7.2100
4.3100
0,4210
0.0000
13.1490
3.5600
1 ,5300'
0.0000
14.3700
0.8400
0.0000
0.0000
' 14.1400
• 0,1630
j_ 0.0000
0.0000
1.0480
1.0830
7.3200
1 ,2800
0.0000
0.0000
8,6700
5.8800
0.0000
0.0000
1 3.5700
0,8300
0.0000
I 0.0000
12,5600
| 0,9890
J 0,0000
0.0000
14.9400
0.0000
\ 0.1120
I 0.0000
J 1.1020
I 1.1100
1 1.1000
1 1 1 ,7900
! 2.8900
57
-------
Code
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
B\iNF
BXPORLATj
8\PORT 8
B\EFF
CAIN? I
CAPGRT A
5\*PORT¥™
CXEFF
0\INF
0\PORT A
D\PORf 8
D\EFF
E \INF
EXPORT _A|
EXPORT 8
EXEFF
A\iNF __,
A\PORT A
A\PQRT B
A\EFF
B\iNF
EXPORT A
BVPORT 8
BVEFF
C\iNF
C\PORT A
C\ PORT B
C\EFF
DMNF
D\PORT A
0\Pv B
D\EFF
E\JNF
l\Pv A
E\PORT8
EXEFF
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 PPM
A\INF
A\PORT A
AXPORT 8
A\EFF
B\iNF
B\PORT A
BVPORT 8
B\EFF
C\!NF
_____
C\ PORT 8
Description
Col A, Port 8 -
Col a, Effluent
ColJlj. Influent
Col 8, Port A ~ I
Coi 8, PoffB I
Coi 8, Effluent
Col C, Influent
Col C, Port A "1
Coi C, Port B
Coi C, Effluent
CsLJ-LJnflueni
Col D, Port A
Col 0, Port 8
Coi D, Effluent
COI I, influent
Coi E, Port A i
Col E, Port 8 i
Col E, Effluent
Col A, Influent
Col ATPort A
Col A, Port 8
Col a, Effluent
Col B, influent
Coi 8, Port A
Coi 8, Ports
Col 8, Effluent
Col C, Influent
Col C, Port A
B
Coi C, Effluent
Col 0, Influent
Col D, Port A
CoJj01_Pjrt_i__
Col D.Efflyent
CO! E, Influent
Col E, Port A
Col E^ Port B
iCoi E, Effluent
(STANDARD
'STANDARD
'STANDARD
Col At Influent
Col; A.Port A
Col A, Port B
Col ajJEffluent
Col B, Influent
JeoiJliJ!MJL^
JCpJJJPortB
|CoJ_^t_S|l^tw__
jCpj_^lnflU(Bjii^_
feoi-C, Port A ..
iCoi C, Port 8
Date
l8-Jan-93i
18-Jan-93i
18-Jan-93l
18-Jani93|
18-Jan-93=
__JJbJiQjJJlj
f87T|^93|
18-Jan^W
i8-ja;n-93=
__JJiliil^l!
18-Jan-93i
l8-Jan-93i
18-Jan-93i
l8-Jan-93^
18-Jan:93j
18-Jan-93]
__J|^Jin>M
is-Jan-gs^
4
^
21-Jan-93;
21-Jan-93^
21-Jan-93:
21-Jan-9g:
^_ 2l-Jan-93'
2l-Jan-93
2l-Jan-93
2l-Jan-93
2l-Jan-93
f 21-Jan-93
21-Jan-93
21-Jan-93
21-Jan-93
2l-Jan-93
2l-Jan-93
21-Jan-93
21-JatL:93
21-Jart-93
2l-Jan-93
21-Jan-i3
25-Jan-.93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
, 25-Jan-93
25-Jan:93
25-Jan-93
> 25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-92
j 25-Jan.:.9S
t 25-Jan-i2
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0.0890
0.0000
9,0900
5.5300
0,2980
0,0000
13.9300
0.1540
0.2180
0.0000
13.4800
0.1420
0,0000
JLM22,
12.3900
0.8630
d.odob
0,0000
6.2100
0.2390
0.2730
0.0000
13.6300
8.8000
__ 1 -2380
rI_I--~J!L£2aZJl
[_^__ 17.4400
0.2870
0.0000
0.2650
3.0560
0.0910
0.0000
0.0000
8.9800
0,0000
0.0000
-. - O.OOQO
0.9480
0,9190
OJ200
22.7900
3.9200
,0.1676
' 0.0000
10.1200
., ' '0.0000
0.0950
S , 0.1480
S 9.15SO
L______MfiM
1 ' " 0^0000
-------
Code
C\EFF
DMNF J
D\PORT A
D\PORT B
D\EFF
I \JNF
BPORT A
BPORT 8
BEFF
1 PPM
i£EM_
1 PPM
AVINF
AXPORT A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
8\iNF
B\PORT A
EXPORT 8
8\£FF
CMNF
C\PORTA
C\ PORT 8
C\EFF
D\!NF
OVPORT A
DXPORT 8
D\EFF
EMNF
BPORT A
E\PORTB
EXEFF
1 PPM
1 PPM
1 PPM
A\INF
A\PORT A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
8\iNF
B\PORT A
8\Port 8
B\£FF
C\fNF
CNPORT A
C\ PORT B
CAEFF
DMNF
D\PORT A
D\PORT B
0\EFF
E MNF
EXPORT A
ip2fiii_
BEFF
Description
Sol C, Effluent
Dot Djjnfluent :
Doi D^Port A . ;
3oi 0, Port B
;Mjy=fflM.n{
CGIJE, influent :
Got E, Port A
Col E, Port 8
CoF E!_E|fluent__
STANDARD
s^DAKo
STANDARD
Col A,Jnfluent
Col A.Port , A
QMA±2ll^____
Col a. Effluent
S2L§A_MllM§£!L
Col B, Port A
£^Ji-f2Ili-__
Coi 8, Effluent
Col C, Influent
Col C, Port A
Col C, Port 8
Col C, Effluent
Col Dt Influent
Col 0, Port A
Coi 0, Port 8
Col D, Effluent
COI E, Influent
CoLJLEsrt A
Col E, Port B
Col E, Effluent
STANDARD .
STANDARD
STANDARD
Col A^ Influent
Col A.Port A
Col A, Port 8
CoJjuJiffijent
Col BJtJnfluent
Col Bj. Port A
Col B, PortB
Col 8, Efflyent
Col C, Influent
Col C, Port A
Col C, Port B
Col C, Effluent
Col^jrjlluinl^^
Col D, Port A
Col D,, Port B
Col D, Effluent
CSLJfcliflMUl— _
Col Ef Port A
CMJ«J2j^-_-___
Col E, Effluent
Date
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-Jan-93
25-JanjJl
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
—JlSinZIa
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
L_lZbia.n-93
27 -Jan -93
27-Jan-93
««2f;lanill
27-Jan-93
27-Jan-93
27-Jan«93
27-Jan-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
1-Fab-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
i-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-93
1-Feb-S3
1-Fab-9J
1-Feb-93
i-Feb-9*
i-Feb-9
l-Feb-9
1-Feb-9
1-Feb-9
1-Feb-9
1-Feb-9
i-Feb-9
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
O.OQOO
9,9880
0,1080
0,2100
0.0000
0,9750
0.9890
0.9600
13.3800
4,6900
0.0760
0.3750
6,9450
0.3320
0.1360
0,0000
7,6500
0.1910
0.2570
0.0000
16.6900
0.2500
a.t!*Q
C-i AOA
. 1 V9U
10-2iM
0.1600
0.0680
0.0000
0.9430
0,9270
0,7490
12,0700
7.1100
2.4700
1.1470
13.7300
1,2020
0,5590
0,8270
10.4090
2,3340
Q,§$$0
0,1140
8,8270
0.8210
0.0000
0.0000
12.5400
___— ___SLZSZSL
0.1090
I 0,0650
59
-------
Code
1_ggm_____
1 PPM i
1 PPM
A\iNF
A\PORT A
A\PORT 8
AXEF-F
B\iNF
8NPORT A
8\PORT 8
§\E£F^Z]
C\iNF
CXPORTA
C\ PORT 8
C\EFF
D\INF
DNPORT A
D\PORT B
D\EFF
E \JNF ,
BPORT A
EAPQRT8
E\EFF
1 ECflL_^
1 PPM M
1 PPM
A\iNF
A\PORT A
A\PORT 8
A\EFF
1\INF
S\PORT A
B\PORT 8
1 ppm
1 PPM
fPPM ,
ANINF
ANPCftt A
A\PORT B
A\EFF
B\INF
B\PORTA
B\PORT 8
B\EFF
C\!NF
CVPORT A '
C\ PORT B
C\EFF
0\iNF
D\PORT A
0\PORT B
Q\EFF__^_
E \JNF ,
BPORT A
EXPORTS
Description
STANDARD
STANDARD
STANDARD
Col jVjJn fluent
Col Ajfort A
Coi A, Port 8
Col a. Effluent
Coi B, Influent
Coi B, Port A
Col 8, PortB
Cj3HLJI!lJl!!L^
Col C, Influent
Col><^£o|l£______^
Coi C, Port 8
Col C, Effluent
Col D, Influent
Coi 0, Port A
Coi D, Port B
Coi D, Effluent ,
COHEJInfluent
Coi E, Port A
CojjElJ5Grt 8
Col E, Effluent
^STANDARD
STANDARD
STANDARD
CojJVj influent
[Cot Aj^ort_A
Col A, Port B
Coi a, Effluent
CjlJIjJnlluji^^
po^ B, Port A
Coi B, PortB
STANDARD
STANDARD
STANDARD
Co! A, Influent
Col A.Port A
Pol A, Port 8
Coi a, Effluent
Col B, Influent
Col 8, Port A
Col 81 PortB
Col B, Effluent
Col C, Influent
Col C, Port A
JGpl C, Port B
Coi C, Effluent
QiJfifiMSM-^-™—----™-——
Col D, Port A
Col D, Port B
SfiL5*iS!Ment
fi^liJaflMisL——
CoJ_EL£ojtA__
iCol E, Port B
Date
2-Feb-93'
2-Feb-93'
2-Feb-93
2-Feb-93
2-Feb-93
2-Feb-93:
2-Feb-93:
2-Feb-93i
2-Feb-93:
2-Feb-93
2*F§kJ3|
2-Feb-93i
2-Fib-93^
2-Feb-93;
2-Feb-93^
2-Fsb-93:
2-Feb-93;
2-Feb-93^
2-Feb-93:
2-Fib-93.
2-Feb-93>
2-Feb-93
2-Feb-93
5-Feb-93
5-Fib-93
5-Fib-93
5-Feb-93
5-Feb-93
5-Feb-93
5-Feb-93
5-Fab-93
S-Fsb-93
5-Feb-93
8-Fib-93
8-Feb-93
8-Feb-93
8-Feb-93
| 8-Fsb-93
8-Feb-93
I 8-Fsb-93
1 8-Feb-93
! 8-Feb-93
1 S-Feb-93
I 8-Feb-93
8-F0b-93
8-Feb-93
8-Fib-93
8-Feb-93
1 8-Feb-93
h 8-Feb-93
w 8-Feb-93
8-F0b-93
8-Fib-93
8-Feb-93
8-Feb-93
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0,9400
0.9040
9.0800
5,3500
0.9680
0.0000
3,1200
0,0130
0.1030
0,0000
___^JL12iQ
0.0000
0,2160
0,0000
6,3100
0,0000
0,0000
0,0000
5.1000
0.0840
,
0,3240
0,9070
0,8900
14,6400
.--— ----J§J2M
0,2170
0.0530*
4,5100
0,182g
0,0000
1.1000
1 .0800
0,9910
: 8,8200
0.1200
0,0000
8,2250
0.0000
0.0000
0,0000
': 7.9600
0,0000
0.0000
; 0,0000
7,7400
0.00.00
0.1190
0.0000
^______JJfOO
! ' 0,0000
i" O.OOOC
60
-------
Code
E\£FF
Description
Col i, Effluent
Date
8-Feb-93
Analysis
(Toluene, ppm)
0,0000
'61
------- |