United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-99-049
September 1999
Air
EMISSION TEST EVALUATION OF A
E PA CREMATORY AT WOODLAWN CEMETERY
IN THE BRONX, NY
VOLUME I OF III
-------
MRI
Emission Test Evaluation
of a Crematory
at Woodlawn Cemetery
in the Bronx, NY
Final Test Report
Volume I
For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standard
Emission Measurement Center
4930 Old Page Road
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Attn: Mr. Foston Curtis
EPA Contract No. 68-D-98-027
Work Assignment No. 2-08
MRI Project No. 4951-08
September 30,1999
Midwest Research Institute • 425 Volker Boulevard • Kansas City, Missouri 64110-2299
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report presents the results of a single test
program at a single cremation facility. It should
not be assumed that these results would
characterize emissions at other cremation
facilities without further study.
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Preface
This document was prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Crematory Association of North
American (CANA). This collaborative test was performed under EPA Contract No. 68-D-
98-027, Work Assignment No. 2-08 and under CANA Project No. 305587. Mr. Foston
Curtis was the EPA Work Assignment Manager and Mr. Paul Rahill was the CANA
representative.
In this draft test report, MRI presents a description of the source tested, the sampling and
analysis procedures, quality assurance and quality control activities, reporting and data
reduction activities, sample and data handling procedures, and schedule, for the test
program. This report is contained in three volumes consisting of 1300 pages.
The test program was conducted in MRFs Applied Engineering Division under the
leadership of Mr. James Surman, Work Assignment Leader. Mr. John Hosenfeld, Program
Manager, provided oversight to technical and administrative aspects of this work
assignment.
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
6r-i; John Hosenfeld
Program Manager
Approved:
Thomas J. Grant, Ph.D., P.E.
Director
Applied Engineering
September 30, 1999
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03Sl.wpd 111
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Contents
Preface iii
Figures vii
Tables vii
Section 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Scope 1
1.3 Project Personnel 2
1.4 Report Organization 2
Section 2. Source Description 1
2.1 Process Description 1
2.2 Control Equipment 1
Section 3. Test Project Description 1
3.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 1
3.2 Test Schedule 2
3.3 Field Test Changes and Problems 2
3.4 Summary of Test Results 4
Section 4. Sampling, Analytical, and Process Data Collection Procedures 1
4.1 Sampling Procedures 1
4.2 Analytical Procedures 7
4.3 Process Data 9
Section 5. Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC) Activities 1
5.1 Equipment Calibration 1
5.2 Emission Measurement and Data Quality Criteria 1
5.3 Data Audit 2
5.4 Data Assessment 2
MR]-AED\R4951-08-03 Sl.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Appendices
Appendix A—List of Samples Collected
Appendix B—Process Data
Appendix C—Field Sampling Data and Sample Traceability
Appendix D—Modified Method 5 Calculations
Appendix E—Galbraith Laboratory Analysis Results
Appendix F—Metals Analysis Results
Appendix G—PCDDs/PCDFs Analysis Results
Appendix H—Particulate Matter Emission Determinations
Appendix I—Calibration Data for Sampling Equipment
Appendix J—Continuous Emission Monitoring Data
MRI-AED\R495l-08-03Sl.wpd VI
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Figures
Figure 2-1. Cremation Incinerator Unit 2
Tables
Table 3-1. Test Matrix—Summary of Emission Sampling and Analytical
Parameters and Methods per Test Run 7
Table 3-2. List of Target Analytes 8
Table 3-3. Stack Sampling Run Times 9
Table 3-4. Summary Test Data 10
Table 3-5. Summary Modified Method 5 Sampling Data—Condition 1 11
Table 3-6. Summary Modified Method 5 Sampling Data—Condition 2 12
Table 3-7. Summary Modified Method 5 Sampling Data—Condition 3 13
Table 3-8. Particulate Matter Test Results 14
Table 3-9. Hydrogen Chloride Emission Results 15
Table 3-10. Metal Emission Results—Condition 1 16
Table 3-11. Metal Emission Results—Condition 2 17
Table 3-12. Metal Emission Results—Condition 3 18
Table 3-13. PCDD/PCDF Homologue Emissions—Condition 1 19
Table 3-14. 2,3,7,8-Substituted PCDD/PCDF Emissions—Condition 1 20
Table 3-15. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 1, Inlet 21
Table 3-16. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 1, Outlet 22
Table 3-17. PCDD/PCDF Homologue Emissions—Condition 2 23
Table 3-18. 2,3,7,8-Substituted PCDD/PCDF Emissions—Condition 2 24
Table 3-19. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 2, Inlet 25
Table 3-20. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 2, Outlet 26
Table 3-21. PCDD/PCDF Homologue Emissions—Condition 3 27
Table 3-22. 2,3,7,8-Substituted PCDD/PCDF Emissions—Condition 3 28
Table 3-23. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 3, Inlet 29
Table 3-24. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 3, Outlet 30
Table 3-25. Summary CEMS and Opacity of Results 31
Table 3-26. Process and Test Data 32
Table 3-27. Summary of Body and Container Characteristics 33
Table 5-1. Calibration Procedures and QC Criteria for Sampling Equipment 3
Table 5-2. Criteria for Emission Measurement and Data Quality 4
Table 5-3. Chloride Duplicate Analysis and Matrix Spike Results 7
Table 5-4. Metals Field and Reagent Blank Results 8
MRl-AED\R4951-08-03Sl.wpd Vll
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Table 5-5. Metals Spike and Check Standard Results 9
Table 5-6. Dioxin/Furan Blank Results (total pg) 10
Table 5-7. Dioxin/Furan Lab Control Spike Results 11
Table 5-8. Toluene Rinse Dioxin/Furan Results—Inlet 12
Table 5-9. Toluene Rinse Dioxin/Furan Results—Outlet 13
Table 5-10. Dioxin/Furan Surrogate Recoveries (%) 14
Table 5-11. Chloride Analysis Results for EPA Audit Samples 16
Table 5-12. Metals Analysis Results for EPA Audit Samples 17
Table 5-13. Dioxin/Furan Audit Sample Results (total pg) 18
MRI-AEDNR4951-08-03 Sl.wpd
Vlll
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 1
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 1 of 2
Section 1.
Introduction
1.1 Background
EPA is required to set emission standards for the "other solid waste incinerators"
(OSWI) category referenced under Section 129(a)(l)(E) of the amended Clean Air Act.
This category currently contains pathological waste incinerators and human crematories. A
representative human crematory, located at the Woodlawn Cemetery in the Bronx, New
York, was tested in support of setting these emission standards. Testing was conducted in
collaboration with the Cremation Association of North America (CANA).
Although emissions data are available from tests at another facility, the unit tested was
not controlled and the body containers (caskets) may not have been representative. Thus,
the Woodlawn facility, which involves a representative human crematory having emission
controls, was selected for baseline ("best controlled similar unit") emissions testing.
Additionally, this test project would help determine the effects of secondary chamber
temperature on emission levels.
1.2 Scope
This EPA work assignment was conducted in collaboration with the Cremation
Association of North America (CANA) and results of testing for both parties are combined
in this report. Emissions testing for polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins (PCDDs) and
polychlorinated dibenzo-furans (PCDFs) and process monitoring was conducted under the
EPA work assignment. In conjunction with EPA testing, emissions testing for total
particulate matter (PM), hydrogen chloride (HC1), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb),
sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and carbon monoxide (CO), and visual
observation of opacity was conducted for CANA.
Testing was conducted for three conditions, where secondary chamber temperature
was varied at 1,400°, 1,600°, and 1,800°F per test. Each test consisted of three sampling
runs at the scrubber inlet and outlet simultaneously with similar container materials, as
available, being used for all runs. Each sampling run covered an entire cycle of about
2 hours.
MRI-AEDNR4951-08-03 Sl.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 1
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 2 of 2
1.3 Project Personnel
The following individuals are the key personnel in the management and execution of
this test project:
The EPA Work Assignment Manager (WAM) was
Mr. Foston Curtis
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards;
Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division; Source Characterization Group A;
Source Measurement Technology Group, MD-19
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: (919) 541-1063
The primary contact assisting MRI, EPA, and Woodlawn Cemetery, as Facility Test Site
Coordinator, on this test project was
Mr. Paul Rahill (representing CANA)
P.O. Box 547796
Orlando, FL 32854-7796
Phone: (407) 886-5533
The MRI Work Assignment Leader (WAL) for this test project was
Mr. James Surman
Midwest Research Institute
425 Volker Blvd.
Kansas City, MO 64110-2299
Phone: (816) 753-7600, ext. 1441
1.4 Report Organization
The results of testing are presented in the following sections of this document.
Section 2 provides process information. Section 3 provides test results and Section 4
provides a description of sampling, analysis, and process data collection. Finally, Section 5
provides a summary of QA/QC results.
MRI-AEDVU951-08-03 Sl.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 2
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 1 of 2
Section 2.
Source Description
2.1 Process Description
The crematory at Woodlawn Cemetery is located in a lower level adjacent to the
basement of the Woolworth Chapel. Four cremation incinerator units of the same design
are operated and vented to the common chimney located on a side of the steeple. A
schematic of the unit tested is presented in Figure 2-1. A retort is preheated prior to
introducing the body container for cremation. Typical cremation takes approximately
2 hours. Following a cremation, the cooldown, removal of the remains, and preheating for
the next cremation takes approximately 1 hour.
The cremation incinerator unit retort consists of a primary combustion chamber where
cremation occurs and a secondary chamber where the products of combustion from the
primary chamber are incinerated further to reduce emissions. The external dimensions of
the retort are approximately 15 feet long by 5 feet wide by 6 feet high. The burner in the
primary chamber is rated at approximately 0.6 MMBTU/hr, and the burner in the secondary
chamber is rated at approximately 1.0 MMBTU/hr. A forced air blower (approximately
400-600 scfm) supplies air to both burners and chambers.
Combustion gases and products are vented through refractory-lined ductwork above
the retort to a wet scrubber with spray chambers using unmodified water (i.e., not caustic
or acidic). Gases from the scrubber pass through a short section of duct with a damper to
the chimney. Uncontrolled emissions were measured in the horizontal, circular section of
duct immediately upstream from the scrubber. Ports were installed for the tests.
Controlled emissions were measured in the short horizontal, circular section of duct
between the scrubber and chimney. A new section with ports and without the damper was
installed for the tests. The damper is used to isolate the unit from the chimney and the
other three units when it is not in use. This unit is considered to be typical for cremation
incinerators, and the scrubber, or a similar device, may be a candidate for maximum
achievable control technology.
2.2 Control Equipment
Combustion gas passes through a wet scrubber prior to entering the chimney.
Entrained paniculate matter and other pollutants exiting the secondary combustion
chamber are removed in the scrubber. The horizontal, cylindrical, stainless steel scrubber
unit is approximately 48 inches long with a 36-inch diameter and uses unmodified city
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S2.wpl
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 2
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 2 of 2
water (i.e., not a caustic or acidic solution). Water spray nozzles are located across the top
of the cylinder, and drains remove water from the bottom of the cylinder.
A temporary platform was erected which ran alongside the scrubber to allow for
sampling at the scrubber inlet and outlet. The scrubber inlet was sampled in the 72-inch
long horizontal circular duct leading into the scrubber. The scrubber outlet was sampled in
the 30-inch long horizontal circular duct connected directly to the scrubber. This was a
temporary duct installed to replace the original duct for the test. The number of traverse
points and sampling time at each point was identical for both inlet and outlet locations.
Chimney
Ceiling
CO
Charging
Door—,
q>
J"l2"
,18" fc 36" 0,18";,
ft
Hot Air Duct
o o
5''18" 6"
< * *>
Primary Chamber
Retort
Inlet/Outlet
Sampling Locations
Secondary
Chamber
Floor
Wall
15'-C
7'-0"
Figure 2-1. Cremation Incinerator Unit
MR1-AEDVR4951-08-03 S2.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 1 of 33
Section 3.
Test Project Description
3.1 Objectives and Test Matrix
The purpose of this collaborative test project was to obtain uncontrolled and controlled
emission data from a crematory at the Woodlawn Cemetery to assist EPA in developing
emission standards under Section 129 of the Clean Air Act. The specific objectives were
to:
• Measure polychlorinated dibenzodioxin (PCDD) and polychlorinated
dibenzofuran (PCDF), total particulate matter (PM), hydrogen chloride (HC1),
cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen
(NOX), and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions simultaneously at the inlet and
outlet of the wet scrubber along with observations of opacity at the chimney
during three operating conditions where the secondary combustion chamber
temperature would be varied
• Monitor and record primary and secondary chamber temperatures, presence of
outdoor ambient odors, charge weights, body container descriptions, batch cycle
times, fuel flow rates, outdoor ambient temperatures, outdoor relative humidity,
and outdoor barometric pressure during each test run.
Testing for the pollutants specified in the work assignment and also those contracted
by CANA was done during three operating or test conditions where the secondary chamber
was maintained at approximately 1,400°, 1,600°, and 1,800°F for each condition. The
retort was heated to operating temperature before testing. Testing for each run was started
when the retort door was closed following insertion of the body container. Testing for each
run was stopped when the operator determined that cremation was completed. Sampling
was not conducted during any portion of a warm-up or cool-down period.
The test matrix, which includes the number of samples or sample component sets
collected during each run for either uncontrolled or controlled emissions, is presented in
Table 3-1. The target pollutants are listed in Table 3-2. Measured emission parameters
were identical at the scrubber inlet and outlet locations. Opacity readings were taken
outside at the chimney during all three tests. All sample analysis for target pollutants,
except HC1, were performed at MRI's laboratories in Kansas City, Missouri. Samples to
be analyzed for HC1 were transferred to Galbraith Laboratories, Inc., in Knoxville,
Tennessee, for analysis. ETS, Inc. of Roanoke, Virginia, performed the EPA instrumental
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 2 of 33
analyzer methods for CO2, O2, SO2, NOX, and CO as well as opacity observations. Process
operating data were collected by CANA during each test run.
3.2 Test Schedule
Testing began June 11 and continued through June 17, 1999. Table 3-3 presents the
test run times. Testing was preceded by preliminary velocity measurements. Once
preliminary measurements were completed and final preparations were in progress, the site
coordinator and other personnel were notified of run start times.
3.3 Field Test Changes and Problems
3.3.1 Sampling
Problems encountered in the field fell into three main categories: probes,
thermocouples, and sample recovery. They are discussed below. Sampling data sheets and
computer generated MM5 data are found in Appendices C and D.
Probes
Even with water-cooled probes, the extreme temperatures at the scrubber inlet caused
some probes to heat and warp, thereby rendering them useless for any subsequent runs.
This did not affect results, but would have resulted in the unavailability of probes for
subsequent runs if no preventative measures were taken. This problem was solved by
conducting inlet sampling in the uppermost port so that probes were oriented on a
downward slope to maintain cooling water at the tip thereby preventing heat warpage. One
additional port had to be installed in order to perform all inlet sampling on a downward
slope. Problems with sample collection as a result of using water-cooled probes in the high
temperature environment are summarized below:
• The additional port was installed after the fourth run. Only two trains were
operated during Run 4 in the two available ports (metals and PCDD/PCDF trains).
The M26A train was not used for HCl, and particular matter sampling was
conducted with the metals train.
• During Run 4, sampling at the inlet continued during port changes at the outlet.
This resulted in longer sampling times at the inlet than at the outlet. For all
subsequent runs sampling at the inlet was halted until port changes at the outlet
were completed to obtain simultaneous inlet/outlet sample collection. The effect
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 3 of 33
of non-simultaneous testing is that results obtained from the inlet during Run 4
are somewhat larger than the outlet results.
• During the last two runs of regular testing (Runs 8 and 9), no M26A trains were
used for sample collection at the outlet in order to conserve usable water-cooled
probes. Particulate matter for these runs was collected on the metals train.
Paniculate matter results were not compromised by using a different train sample
collection, however, no HC1 samples could be collected as a result.
• Some trains at the scrubber inlet location (Run 1 M26A train, Run 2 M29 train,
Run 2 M23 train, Run 3 M26A train, and Run 5 M23 train) did not pass final leak
check from the nozzle, but did pass from the sample transfer line. This appeared
to be caused by extreme temperatures loosening the nozzle-to-probe liner
connection. Since O2, CO2, and moisture results were nearly identical for all
trains within a given run, results from these trains appear to be uncompromised
and representative of stack conditions.
The PCDD/PCDF outlet trains for Runs 5 and 10 did not pass final leak check. These
results are considered to be unusable and are therefore not reported.
Thermocouples
During Run 1, the probe thermocouple on the PCDD/PCDF train at the scrubber inlet
location shorted out. This was replaced after the end of the run with the result that no
probe temperature data was available for the second half of the run. However, based on
stack temperature and filter box temperature, this is not expected to have affected results.
During Run 3, the XAD thermocouple on the PCDD/PCDF train started to fail, giving
high temperature readings in spite of frequent applications of ice. It was replaced during
port change and readings thereafter were well within method requirements. Data were not
affected, since the high temperature readings were not a reflection of actual temperatures
thought to have been experienced at the XAD inlet.
Sample Recovery
The recovery and QA rinses of the Run 1 PCDD/PCDF inlet and outlet sampling
trains were not collected according to the test plan (see analysis memo in Appendix A).
The recovery rinses for the semivolatile front-half (PCDD/PCDF FH) outlet were
inadvertently placed into the SV FH inlet sample bottles. This was easily corrected by
analyzing the recovery rinses labeled for the inlet with the outlet train samples and
designating a new number for the inlet train rinses to prevent mix up during analysis. The
QA rinse from the PCDD/PCDF front-half outlet was inadvertently placed into the inlet
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 4 of 33
sample bottle which already contained the inlet back-half QA rinses. A new sample bottle
was used to collect the remaining PCDD/PCDF front-half rinses of the inlet train. This
resulted in partial collection of inlet and outlet train QA rinses and a third sample
containing some rinses from each train.
The final QA toluene soak (3rd of 3) from the Run 4, PCDD/PCDF outlet train was
inadvertently placed in the corresponding recovery rinse sample bottle instead. This would
not affect sample results, but would lengthen sample concentration time during analysis
and could potentially result in a lower QA rinse result.
3.3.2 Analytical
Samples were analyzed according to the Site Specific Test Plan and Quality Assurance
Project Plan with no problems or changes.
3.4 Summary of Test Results
Testing was performed to gather emissions data from a crematory to assist in
developing emissions standards under Section 129 of the Clean Air Act. Results of testing
at the Unit 4 crematory in the Woolworth Chapel at Woodlawn Cemetery are presented
here. Summary test data is presented in Table 3-4 with more detailed summaries in all the
following tables. The calculation of removal efficiencies are not appropriate to this test
since scrubber inlet amounts are so low.
3.4.1 Modified Method 5 and Paniculate Matter Results
Data obtained from sampling trains are summarized in Tables 3-5 through 3-7. Each
sampling train provided data on gas velocity, temperature, pressure, O2, CO2, and
volumetric flow rates. As flagged in the tables, some trains at the scrubber inlet location
did not pass final leak check from the nozzle, but did pass from the sample transfer line.
CO2 and O2 results indicate some inleakage was occurring between the inlet and outlet
sampling locations. This evidence of inleakage is supported by the higher dry standard
volumetric gas flow rates (averages of flow rates measured by all trains at a location)
measured at the outlet location.
The variability in dry standard volumetric gas flow rate results is not due to equipment
calibration or probe orientation with duct walls during sampling. Sampling locations were
not ideal for obtaining consistent flow data. The Method 23 inlet train was nearest to the
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 5 of 33
last duct bend after the secondary combustion chamber, and the Method 23 outlet train was
located nearest to the scrubber outlet. More turbulent flow expected at these locations may
explain the higher flow results obtained with the Method 23 trains. Because flow was
different at each traverse point at any given time across each sampling cross-section and
flow varied at each of those points during the course of a run, consistent flow results could
not be obtained among the trains used at the inlet or the outlet during any run.
Results of testing for total particulate matter are presented in Table 3-8. As indicated
from the data, inlet and outlet concentrations for each run were very similar, regardless of
condition thereby indicating that the scrubber had little, or no effect on particulate matter
removal. Data from particulate matter testing are found in Appendix H.
3.4.2 Hydrogen Chloride Analysis Results
Hydrogen chloride emission results are presented in Table 3-9 in units of both grams
per minute and pounds per hour. While, emissions appear to be lower at the scrubber
outlet than at the inlet for Condition 1, the HC1 concentrations are too low at the inlet
relative to the outlet locations for removal efficiencies to be meaningful. HC1 data are
included in Appendix E.
3.4.3 Metals Analysis Results
Metals results, blank corrected results and emission rates are shown in Tables 3-10
through 3-12. Cadmium and lead emissions tend to increase with secondary combustion
chamber temperature increase; mercury emissions were less affected by temperature than
the other two metals. The increase in metals emissions with increasing temperatures is not
uncommon, however, the amount of cadmium and lead charged during each run may also
have contributed. The metals narrative report with analysts' results are included in
Appendix F.
3.4.4 Dioxin and Furan Results
Dioxin and furan results are provided in Tables 3-13 through 3-24, grouped by
condition. Tables 3-13 through 3-16 provide results for Condition 1 testing, Tables 3-17
through 3-20 provide results for Condition 2 testing, and Tables 3-21 through 3-24 provide
results for Condition 3 testing. Results for each condition are presented first by total
amount found within a given homologue, next by the 2,3,7,8-substituted compounds, then
by the corresponding equivalent toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-dioxin for inlet and
outlet. The dioxin and furan narrative report is included in Appendix G. It should be noted
MRI-AEDVR4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 6 of 33
that Run 1 inlet results are low by a factor of 10 compared to Runs 2 and 3. As is
commonly observed, data show a trend for increased dioxin/furan amounts at the outlet
compared with the inlet. There is also a trend for increased dioxin/furan amounts as SCC
temperatures are increased.
3.4.5 Results of O2, CO2, SO2, NOX, and CO Analysis and Opacity
Observations
Continuous instrumental analyzers were used for the duration of a cremation to
measure scrubber inlet and outlet emissions of O2, CO2, SO2, NOX, and CO. A concurrent
visible emissions evaluation for opacity was also performed at the chimney outlet. Results
of continuous instrumental analyzers monitoring and opacity observations are presented in
Table 3-25.
The Run 5 cremation in Unit 4 started 30 minutes before the end of a cremation in
Unit 1. For the first 30 minutes of Run 5, therefore, visible emissions recorded may not
reflect the true visible emissions from Unit 4 only.
The SO2, NOX, and CO instrumental analyzers occasionally recorded gas concentration
spikes that exceeded their span. At the end of the test program, the linearity of the
analyzers at higher concentrations was demonstrated by using a calibration gas above the
highest one-minute average spike measured during the test program. Calibration gas was
introduced at the sampling probe, and linearity was demonstrated to meet the accuracy and
calibration error requirements of Methods 6C, 7E, and 10 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60.
Data from the post-test linearity checks are contained in Appendix J.
3.4.6 Process Data
Process test data and a summary of body/container characteristics are provided in
Tables 3-26 and 3-27, respectively. Process data collection forms are found in
Appendix B. As denoted in the process data Table 3-26, no ambient odors were noticeable
near the crematory. However, a slight foul odor could be observed by passersby near the
down draft of the stack during the first 2 to 3 minutes.
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 7 of 33
Table 3-1. Test Matrix — Summary of Emission Samplin
Sampling
location
Scrubber
inlet or
outlet duct
Scrubber
outlet
Sampling or
measurement
time
One full operating
cycle
(approximately
2 hours)
One full operating
cycle
(approximately
2 hours)
Test method and
sample size
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 23, *2.4 m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 29, *2m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 26A, 22m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 2
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Methods 3 and 3B,
220L
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 4, * 2-2.4 m3
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 3A
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 6C
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 7E
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 10
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 9
Emission
parameters
Dioxins and furans
Metals
(Cd, Hg, and Pb)
Paniculate matter
HCI
Velocity, pressure,
temperature,
volumetric flow rate
CO2 and O2
(Molecular weight;
and emission rate
correction factor for
dioxins and furans)
Moisture
CO2 and O2
(to normalize SO2,
NOX, and CO
results)
S02
NOX
CO
Opacity
g and Analytical Parameters and Methods per Test Run
Total number of
samples or sample
component sets per run
& location
1 set emission samples
and 1 set QA samples
1
1
1
NA
3
3
1 continuous
1 continuous
1 continuous
1 continuous
1 data set continued
every 15 seconds
Preparation method
Solvent extraction
Method 29 microwave
and hotplate digestion
Desiccation
NA
NA
NA
NA
Paniculate matter and
moisture removal
Paniculate matter and
moisture removal
Paniculate matter and
moisture removal
Paniculate matter and
moisture removal
NA
Analytical method
HRGC/HRMS
(SW-846, Method 8290)
GFAAS (SW-846, Methods
7000A, 7131 A, and 7421; and
CVAAS (SW-846, Method 7470A)
Gravimetric
1C (Method 26A)
Pilot tube,
thermocouple
Orsat
Gravimetric
NDIRforCOj
Micro-fuel cell for O2
UV spectrophotometry
Chemiluminescense
Gas filter correlation NDIR
Visual observation
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 8 of 33
Table 3-2. List of Target Analytes
Compound or Group
CAS No.
Dioxin/Furans:
2,3,7,8-TCDD 1746-01-6
Total TCDD 41903-57-5
2,3,7,8-TCDF 51207-31-9
Total TCDF 55722-27-5
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 40321-76-4
Total PeCDD 36088-22-9
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 57117-41-6
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 57117-31 -4
Total PeCDF 30402-15-4
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 39227-28-6
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 57653-85-7
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 19408-74-3
Total HxCDD 34465-46-8
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 70648-26-9
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 57117-44-9
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 72918-21-9
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 60851-34-5
Total HxCDF 55684-94-1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 35822-46-9
Total HpCDD 37871-00-4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 67562-39-4
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 55673-89-7
Total HpCDF 38998-75-3
OCDD 3268-87-9
OCDF 39001-02-0
Metals:
Cadmium 7440-43-9
Lead 7439-92-1
Mercury 7439-97-6
Other Pollutants:
Sulfur dioxide 7446-09-5
Oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
Carbon monoxide 630-08-0
Hydrogen chloride 7647-01 -0
Particulate matter (per Method 5)
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 9 of 33
Table 3-3. Stack Sampling Run Times
Run
Number
1
Inlet
Outlet
2
Inlet
Outlet
3
Inlet
Outlet
4
Inlet
Outlet
5
Inlet
Outlet
6
Inlet
Outlet
7
Inlet
Outlet
8
Inlet
Outlet
9
Inlet
Outlet
10
Inlet
Outlet
Stack Sampling Intervals (in minutes per 24-hour clock)
Date
6/11/99
6/12/99
6/13/99
6/13/99
6/14/99
6/15/99
6/15/99
6/16/99
6/17/99
6/17/99
(PM/HCI/CI2)
15:20-16:20
17:00-18:00
15:22-16:22
17:02-18:02
11:45-12:45
13:10-14:10
11:47-12:47
13:12-14:12
09:06-10:06
10:29-11:29
09:08-10:08
10:31 -11:31
16:07-17:07
17:27-18:27
15:50-16:50
17:20-18:20
15:52-16:52
17:22-18:22
10:45-11:45
12:11 -13:11
10:47-11:47
12:13-13:13
17:50-18:50
19:10-20:10
17:52-18:52
19:12-20:12
15:40-16:40
16:48-18:18
10:05-11:05
11:18-12:18
(Metals)
15:21 -16:21
17:01 -18:01
15:20-16:20
17:00-18:00
11:46-12:46
13:11 -14:11
11:45-12:45
13:10-14:10
09:07-10:07
10:30-11:30
09:06-10:06
10:29-11:29
16:05-18:35
16:05-17:05
17:25-18:25
15:51 -16:51
17:21 -18:21
15:50-16:50
17.20-18:20
10:46-11:46
12:12-13:12
10:45-11:45
12:11 -13:11
17:51 -18:51
19:11 -20:11
17:50-18:50
19:10-20:10
15:41 -16:41
16:49-18:19
15:40-16:40
16:48-18:18
10:06-11:06
11:19-12:19
10:05-11:05
11:18-12:18
(Semivolatiles)
15:20-16:20
17:00-18:00
15:21 -16:21
17:01 -1801
11:45-12.45
13:10-14:10
11:46-12:46
13:11 -14:11
09:06-10:06
10:29-11:29
09:07-10:07
10:30-11:30
16:05-18:35
16:06-17:06
17:26-18:26
15:50-16:50
17:20-18:20
15:51 -16:51
17:21 -18:21
10:45-11:45
12:11 -13:11
10:46-11:46
12:12-13:12
17:50-18:50
19:10-2010
17:51 -18:51
19:11 -20:11
15:40-16:40
16:48-18:18
15:41 -16:41
16:49-18:19
10:05-11:05
11:18-12:18
10:06-11:06
11:19-12:19
16:02-17:02
17:06-18:06
16:02-17:02
17:06-18:06
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Table 3-4. Summary Test Data
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 10 of 33
Body
Run No. Description
1 157 Ib, not embalmed,
white plastic sheet
2 163 Ib, not embalmed.
white plastic sheet
3 182 Ib, not embalmed,
white plastic pouch,
metal found in remains
Condition 1 Test Average
4 1 99 Ib, not embalmed,
light white plastic pouch
5 180 Ib, embalmed
6 1 88 Ib, not embalmed,
white plastic sheets
Condition 2 Test Average
7 140 Ib, embalmed, cloth
sheet
8 200 Ib, not embalmed,
white plastic pouch
9 1 05 Ib, not embalmed,
white plastic pouch
Condition 3 Test Average
Container
Description
15lb; white fiberboard,
chipboard bottom
85 Ib; white fiberboard &
chipboard, wooden
inserts
10 Ib; brown fiberboard,
no wood
10 Ib; brown fiberboard,
no wood
1 00 Ib; ptcl board
casket; fabric lining,
plastic fiber stuffing,
white plastic sheet
30 Ib; fiberboard with
pine base, chipboard
bottom
1 00 Ib; ptcl board
casket; fabric lining,
plastic fiber stuffing,
white plastic sheet
10 Ib; brown fiberboard,
no wood
10 Ib; brown fiberboard,
no wood
Average
sec
Temp
°F
1425
1475
1450
1450
1660
1656
1645
1654
1845
1838
1838
1840
Particulate Matter
Cone (corr to 7% O2)
(gr/dscf)
Inlet
0.016
0.013
0.015
0.015
0.032
0.029
0.038
0.033
0.112
0.051
0.040
0.068
Outlet
0.019
0.012
0.017
0.016
0.032
0.029
0.040
0.034
0.115
0.052
0.037
0.068
HCI
(Ib/hr)
Inlet
0.029
0.032
0.095
0.053
-
0.074
0.21
0.14
0.43
0.16
0.19
0.26
Outlet
0.012
0.011
0.076
0.033
0.11
0.097
0.23
0.15
0.39
-
.
0.39
Cd
0.004
0.002
0.014
0.006
0.032
0.032
0.091
0.052
0.13
0.17
0.03
0.11
Metals
(9/hr)
Inlet
Pb
0.06
0.02
0.21
0.10
0.39
0.21
0.37
0.32
0.99
0.47
0.32
0.59
Hg
0.30
0.003
0.51
0.27
0.82
0.14
0.02
0.33
0.240
0.014
0.005
0.086
Cd
0.003
0.003
0.013
0.006
0.029
0.025
0.059
0.038
0.08
0.11
0.03
0.07
Metals
(9/hr)
Outlet
Pb
0.05
0.03
0.20
0.09
0.49
0.17
0.21
0.29
0.82
0.33
0.16
0.44
PCDD/PCDF
Homologue
(ng/min)
Hg
0.20
0.006
0.23
0.15
0.71
0.07
0.01
0.26
0.160
0.012
0.007
0.060
Inlet
6.5
97
86
82'
76
146
194
139
221
187
167
192
Outlet
206
325
482
338
527
-
701
614
697
254
319
423
" Includes inlet Run 10 result of 140 ng/min.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 11 of 33
Table 3-5. Summary Modified Method 5 Sampling Data—Condition 1
Run 1
Inlet
Outlet
Run 2
Inlet
Outlet
Run 3
Inlet
Outlet
Run 10
Inlet
Outlet
M29
M26A"
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29"
M26A
M23"
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A"
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M23
M23D
Sampling
time
(min)
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
-
Gas
volume
(dscm)
1.269
1.652
1.884
0.684
0.879
1.316
1.628
.478
.739
.009
.109
.385
1.456
1.383
1.983
0.898
1.098
1.592
1.766
-
Orsat Analysis
Oxygen
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
11.4
11.4
1L4
11.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
11.4
11.4
11.5
11.4
9.3
9.3
M
9.3 .
10.0
10.0
101
10.0
10.5
-
CO2
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.1
6.1
5J.
6.1
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.1
6.1
6J2
6.1
7.5
7.5
L5
7.5
7.1
7.1
LQ.
7.1
6.9
-
Water
13.5
13.6
144
13.5
22.8
23.9
23J.
23.3
14.9
15.3
15/L
15.1
28.5
24.7
25/L
26.1
15.5
15.4
149
15.3
24.2
20.7
25.1
23.3
14.0
-
Avg. Stack
Temp.
(F)
1294
1272
1310
1292
503
526
530
520
1234
1253
1238
1242
526
514
528
523
1261
1225
1238
1241
509
521
516
515
1199
-
Iso-
kinetic
102.3
102.7
96.4
100.3
100.8
104.6
103.6
100.4
98.6
105.5
101.4
101.8
100.8
100.7
101.0
101.1
97.5
102.1
99.0
-
Stack
velocity
(act. ft/min)
505
649
804
653
171
227
329
242
632
601
212
648
266
286
362
305
593
553
793
646
230
282
412
308
698
-
Stack
flow rate
(dscft/min)
326
424
515
422
331
423
616
457
414
388
465
422
464
531
660
552
379
362
518
420
431
547
Z58
579
469
-
(dscm/min)
9
12
15
12
9
12
17
13
12
11
13
12
13
15
19
16
11
10
15
12
12
15
21
16
13
-
M29 = Multiple metals sampling train. M26A = Particulate/HCI sampling train.
' Failed final leak check from nozzle, but passed from sample transfer line.
b Failed final leak check.
M23 = PCDD/PCDF sampling train.
MRI-AEDVR4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 12 of 33
Table 3-6. Summary Modified Method 5 Sampling Data—Condition 2
Run 4
Inlet
Outlet
Run 5
Inlet
Outlet
Run 6
Inlet
Outlet
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23"
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
Sampling
time
(min)
150
.
150
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
-
120
120
120
120
120
120
Gas
volume
(dscm)
1.844
-
2.730
1.049
1.123
1.476
1.813
1.448
2.263
1.025
1.261
.
1.822
1.451
2.126
0.970
1.101
1.786
Orsat Analysis
Oxygen
8.7
-
LZ
8.7
9.3
9.3
9.4
9.3
8.1
8.1
LI
8.1
9.7
9.7
.
9.7
9.0
9.0
Li
9.0
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.6
CO2
7.7
.
LZ
7.7
7.4
7.4
L±
7.4
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
7.9
7.9
-
7.9
8.1
8.1
Li
8.0
7.0
7.0
LQ
7.0
Water
17.3
-
11§
17.4
26.9
28.2
28.2
27.8
15.3
15.3
15.9
15.5
24.5
24.4
-
24.5
14.8
15.5
1^4
15.2
24.3
25.3
24.9
24.8
Avg. Stack
Temp.
(F)
1432
-
1509
1471
574
557
619
583
1409
1308
1480
1399
610
631
.
621
1443
1241
1498
1394
605
628
634
622
I so-
kinetic
102.6
-
103.5
104.3
105.6
105.8
100.2
100.5
101.8
101.2
101.4
-
99.4
99.8
100.2
100.9
101.9
99.4
Stack
velocity
(act. ft/min)
666
-
1.020
843
287
305
426
339
816
614
1.048
826
293
367
.
330
835
597
1.001
811
275
321
535
377
Stack
flow rate
(dscft/min)
379
.
556
468
487
516
679
561
477
380
586
481
492
603
-
548
483
383
559
475
465
524
8J5
621
(dscm/min)
11
.
16
14
14
15
19
16
14
11
1Z
14
14
17
-
16
14
11
16
14
13
15
25
18
M29 = Multiple metals sampling train. M26A = Particulate/HCI sampling train.
" Failed final leak check from nozzle, but passed from sample transfer line.
M23 = PCDD/PCDF sampling train.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 13 of 33
Table 3-7. Summary Modified Method 5 Sampling Data—Condition 3
Run 7
Inlet
Outlet
Run8
Inlet
Outlet
Run 9
Inlet
Outlet
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
M29
M26A
M23
Average =
Sampling
time
(min)
120
120
120
120
120
120
150
150
150
150
-
150
120
120
120
120
.
120
Gas
volume
(dscm)
1.626
1.458
1.926
0.782
0.982
1.473
2.104
1.681
2.386
1.311
-
1.826
1.831
1.407
1.943
0.994
-
1.402
Orsat Analysis
Oxygen
7.1
7.1
LI
7.1
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.4
7.6
7.6
ZJ5
7.6
8.9
-
8.9
8.9
7.8
7.8
L§
7.8
9.2
-
9.2
9.2
CO2
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
8.6
8.6
8J
8.6
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
7.4
-
L5
7.4
8.2
8.2
&2
8.2
7.3
-
L3
7.3
Water
15.2
15.3
16.6
15.7
27.2
27.5
28.1
27.6
16.2
17.2
16.8
16.7
27.3
-
2LQ
27.2
15.1
15.6
16.6
15.8
26.8
.
28.7
27.8
Avg. Stack
Temp.
(F)
1572
1496
1647
1572
621
657
677
652
1626
1542
1694
1621
675
-
703
689
1553
1462
1629
1548
671
-
667
669
Iso-
kinetic
100.0
100.0
102.1
101.0
99.0
103.4
100.0
101.0
101.4
97.0
-
101.4
99.0
100.0
101.0
100.0
-
108.8
Stack
velocity
(act. ft/min)
795
687
9Z3
818
234
312
460
335
848
653
988
830
344
-
46Z
406
889
653
980
841
311
-
414
363
Stack
flow rate
(dscft/min)
428
384
49Z
436
375
481
691
516
443
351
496
430
527
-
701
614
486
372
507
455
482
.
625
554
(dscm/min)
12
11
H
12
11
14
20
15
13
10
H
12
15
-
20
18
14
11
14
13
14
-
18
16
M29 = Multiple metals sampling train.
M26A = Particulate/HCI sampling train.
M23 = PCDD/PCDF sampling train.
MRI-AEDXR4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Table 3-8. Particulate Matter Test Results
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 14 of 33
Parameter
Amount found in probe rinse (g)
Amount found on filter (g)
Total participate weight (g)
Total participate weight (grains)
Gas sample volume (dscf)
Oxygen concentration (%)
Particulate concentration -
corrected to 7% O2 (gr/dsdf)
Condition Avg (gr/dscf, corr 7%O2)
Parameter
Amount found in probe rinse (g)
Amount found on filter (g)
Total participate weight (g)
Total particulate weight (grains)
Gas sample volume (dscf)
Oxygen concentration (%)
Particulate concentration -
corrected to 7% O2 (gr/dsdf)
Condition Avg (gr/dscf, corr 7%O2)
Parameter
Amount found in probe rinse (g)
Amount found on filter (g)
Total particulate weight (g)
Total particulate weight (grains)
Gas sample volume (dscf)
Oxygen concentration (%)
Particulate concentration -
corrected to 7% O2 (gr/dsdf)
Condition Avg (gr/dscf, corr 7%O2)
Run 1
0.0223
0.0246
0.0469
0.7238
58.330
10.0
0.016
0.015
Run 4
0.0596
0.0580
0.1176
1.8148
65.139
8.7
0.032
0.033
Run 7
0.2005
0.1713
0.3718
5.7378
51 .487
7.1
0.112
0.068
INLET
Run 2
0.0223
0.0121
0.0344
0.5309
52.208
10.4
0.013
INLET
Run 5
0.0389
0.0504
0.0893
1.3781
51.120
8.1
0.029
INLET
Run 8
0.1118
0.0777
0.1895
2.9244
59.368
7.6
0.051
Condition 1
Run 3
0.0186
0.0200
0.0386
0.5957
48.839
9.3
0.015
Condition 2
Run 6
0.0513
0.0560
0.1073
1.6559
51.243
9.0
0.038
Condition 3
Run 9
0.0744
0.0459
0.1203
1.8565
49.676
7.8
0.040
Run 1
0.0121
0.0143
0.0264
0.4074
31.039
11.4
0.019
0.016
Run 4
0.0172
0.0512
0.0684
1.0556
39.673
9.3
0.032
0.033
Run 7
0.0543
0.1793
0.2336
3.6050
34.696
8.4
0.115
0.067
OUTLET
Run 2
0.0112
0.0093
0.0205
0.3164
39.148
11.4
0.012
OUTLET
Run 5
0.0203
0.0478
0.0681
1.0509
44.517
9.7
0.029
OUTLET
Run 8
0.0423
0.0934
0.1357
2.0942
46.302
8.9
0.052
Run 3
0.0122
0.0206
0.0328
0.5062
38.785
10.0
0.017
Run 6
0.0215
0.0541
0.0756
1.1667
38.898
10.6
0.040
Run 9
0.0203
0.0502
0.0705
1.0880
35.088
9.2
0.037
MRI-AED\R495I-08-03 SJ.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 15 of 33
Table 3-9. Hydrogen Chloride Emission Results
Run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
No.
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Chloride
cone.
(mg/L)
53.5
10.0
60.9
9.4
189.9
66.2
90.6
138.6
83.2
389.1
199.2
786.1
325.9
349.4
345.5
Impinger
volume
(L)
0.5537
0.6185
0.5147
0.6390
0.5054
0.6154
0.6638
0.5191
0.6340
0.5192
0.6160
0.5273
0.6153
0.5720
0.5223
Quantity
found
(mg)
29.6
6.19
31.3
6.01
96.0
40.7
60.1
71.95
52.7
202.0
122.7
414.5
200.5
199.9
180.4
Stack gas
sample
volume
(dscm)
1.652
0.879
1.478
1.109
1.383
1.098
1.123
1.448
1.261
1.451
1.101
1.458
0.982
1.681
1.407
HCI
cone.
(mg/dscm)
17.9
7.04
21.2
5.42
69.4
37.1
53.5
49.69
41.8
139.2
111.5
284.3
204.2
118.9
128.2
(ppm)
11.9
4.65
14.0
3.58
45.9
24.5
35.4
32.9
27.7
92.1
73.7
188
135
78.6
84.8
Stack
flow
(dscm/min)
12
12
11
15
10
15
15
11
17
11
15
11
14
10
11
HCI
emission
(g/min)
0.22
0.087
0.24
0.084
0.71
0.57
0.83
0.56
0.73
1.6
1.7
3.2
2.9
1.2
1.5
(Ib/h)
0.029
0.012
0.032
0.011
0.095
0.076
0.11
0.074
0.097
0.21
0.23
0.43
0.39
0.16
0.19
MRI-AED\R495I-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 16 of 33
Table 3-10. Metal Emission Results—Condition 1
INLET
Metal Cd
t
Measured Blank Corred
Run 1
Rinse and filter, ug 8.4
HNO3 impinger, ug 0.348
Fourth impinger, ug NA
KMnO4 impinger, ug NA
HCI rinse, ug NA
Total, ug 8.7
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions,jj/hr
Run 2
Rinse and filter, ug 3.36
HN03 impinger, ug 1.13
Fourth impinger, ug NA
KMnO4 impinger, ug NA
HCI rinse, ug NA
Total, ug 4.49
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Run 3
Rinse and filter, ug 29.6
HN03 impinger, ug 0.649
Fourth impinger, ug NA
KMnO4 impinger, ug NA
HCI rinse, ug NA
Total, ug 30.2
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Blank
Rinse and filter, ug 0.360
HNO3 impinger, ug <0.067
Fourth impinger, ug N/A
KMn04 impinger, ug N/A
HCI rinse, ug N/A
t
8.0 I
0.348 !
NA i
NA !
NA I
8.4 ;
6.6 i
0.004 ,'
I
3.00 !
1.13 I
NA :
NA i
NA I
4.13 I
2.54 I
0.0018 I
29.2 I
0.649 I
NA I
NA I
NA I
29.9 I
20.5 I
0.014 ,'
i
f
t
Measured
150
1.63
NA
NA
NA
152
39.4
2.23
NA
NA
NA
41.6
458
2.21
NA
NA
NA
460
0.820
0.825
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pb
Blank Correct
149
0.81
NA
NA
NA
150
118
0.06
38.6
1.41
NA
NA
NA
40.0
24.6
0.018
457
1.39
NA
NA
NA
459
315
0.21
Hg
MeasuredJIank Correct
< 0.400
35.9
5.17
24.3
611
547
< 0.400
< 4.97
< 0.196
1.22
< 1.00
7.79
0.776
50.4
8.25
889
180
1128
<0.400
<3.00
<0.200
<0.800
<1.00
0.400
35.9
5.17
24.3
611
547
336
0.24
0.400
4.97
0.196
1.22
1.00
7.79
4.78
0.0034
0.776
50.4
8.25
889
180
1128
775
0.51
OUTLET
Cd
i
Pb
Hg
Measured Blank Corred Measured Blank Correct Measured
4.44
0.169
NA
NA
NA
4.61
3.76
0.211
NA
NA
NA
3.97
15.6
0.608
NA
NA
NA
16.2
4.08
0.169
NA
NA
NA
4.2
6.2
0.003
3.40
0.211
NA
NA
NA
3.61
3.58
0.0028
15.2
0.608
NA
NA
NA
15.8
17.6
0.013
I 61.6
! 1.56
i NA
! NA
I NA
I 63.2
I
i
i
1 ~~
! 37.2
1 1.66
I NA
I NA
; NA
I 38.9
1
t
1
i 236
1 10.40
i NA
i NA
I NA
I 246
I
!
60.8
0.74
NA
NA
NA
61.5
89.9
0.05
36.4
0.835
NA
NA
NA
37.2
36.9
0.029
235
9.60
NA
NA
NA
245
273
0.20
< 0.400
49.4
23.5
8.79
154
236
^——
< 0.400
< 5.14
< 0.195
< 1.00
< 1.00
7.74
0.440
28.4
8.47
176
74.0
287
Blank Correct
0.400
49.4
23.500
8.79
154
236
345
0.2
0.400
5.14
0.195
1.00
1.00
7.74
7.67
0.0060
0.440
28.4
8.47
176
74.0
287
320
0.23
i
I I
i i
t
MRI-AEDW4951-08-03 S3.wpJ
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 17 of 33
Table 3-11. Metal Emission Results—Condition 2
INLET
Metal
Measured
Run 4
Rinse and filter, ug 88.0
HNO3 impinger, ug 0.644
Fourth impinger, ug NA
KMnO4 impinger, ug NA
HCI rinse, ug NA
Total, ug 88.6
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Runs
Rinse and filter, ug 70.0
HNO3 impinger, ug 0.339
Fourth impinger, ug NA
KMnO4 impinger, ug NA
HCI rinse, ug NA
Total, ug 70.3
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Run 6
Rinse and filter, ug 198
HNO3 impinger, ug 0.366
Fourth impinger, ug NA
KMnO4 impinger, ug NA
HCI rinse, ug NA
Total, ug 198
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Blank
Rinse and filter, ug 0.360
HNO3 impinger, ug <0.067
Fourth impinger, ug N/A
KMnCM impinger, ug N/A
HCI rinse, ug N/A
Cd
Blank Correct
88.0
0.644
NA
NA
NA
88.6
48.1
0.032
69.6
0.339
NA
NA
NA
70.0
38.6
0.032
I
Measured
i
|
I 1080
! 2.39
I NA
: NA
I NA
i 1082
I
!
I
1
1 444
• 1.53
I NA
• NA
j NA
446
I
I
I
198
0.366
NA
NA
NA
198
109
0.091
(Run 4, inlet only)
<0.100
.
i 804
I 1'9
1 NA
; NA
i NA
1 806
1
i
I
10.820
10.825
IN/A
,'N/A
IN/A
i
Pb i
Blank Correct !
i
i
1079 I
1.57 :
NA !
NA !
NA I
1080 i
586 i
0.39 '•
i
443 l<
0.71 '
NA i
NA :
NA I
444 :
245 !
0.21 ;
i
'•
803 '<
11 ;
NA !
NA
NA \<
804 '
441 !
0.37
— i —
(Run 4, inlet only)
1.36 !
I
f
|
Hg
Measured
0.488
143
5.84
1770
376
2295
0.400
15.4
5.97
249
38.5
309
0.400
32.8
1.20
7.79
1.00
43.2
<0.400
<3.00
O.200
<0.800
<1.00
Blank Correct
0.488
143
5.84
1770
376
2295
1245
0.82
0.400
15.4
5.97
249
38.5
309
171
0.14
0.400
32.8
1.20
7.79
100
43
24
0.02
(Run 4, inlet only)
<0.400
OUTLET
Measured
36.4
0.748
NA
NA
NA
37.1
31.0
0.325
NA
NA
NA
31.3
73.0
0.644
NA
NA
NA
73.6
Cd
Blank Correct
36.0
0.748
NA
NA
NA
36.8
35.1
0.029
30.6
0.325
NA
NA
NA
31.0
30.2
0.025
72.6
0.644
NA
NA
NA
73.3
75.6
0.059
Pb
, Measured Blank Correct !
1
I 604
! 5.34
NA
: NA
NA
i 609
I
I
;
1 205
: 2.16
I NA
' NA
i NA
; 207
*
!
254
; 3.91
| NA
NA
NA
! 258
I
i
1
I
i
t
|
1
|
1
I
603
4.52 1
NA 1
NA 1
NA
608 I
579 1
0.49 !
204 l<
1.34 !<
NA
NA !
NA i
206 '
201 I
0.17
•
253 j<
3.09 '<
NA !
NA <
NA ;<
256
264
0.21 ;
I
'
,
|
i
;
Ha
Measured
0.664
52.9
10.2
589
239
892
0.400
5.32
2.12
77.1
2.79
87.7
0.400
5.13
0.537
1.00
1.00
8.07
Blank Correct
0.664
52.9
10.2
589.0
239
892
850
0.71
0.400
5.32
2.12
77.1
2.79
87.7
85.6
0.072
0.400
5.13
0.537
1.00
1.00
8.07
8.32
0.0065
MRI-AED\R495I-08-03 S3 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 18 of 33
Table 3-12. Metal Emission Results—Condition 3
Metal
Run 7
Rinse and filter, ug
HN03 impinger, ug
Fourth impinger, ug
KMn04 impinger, ug
HCI rinse, ug
Total, ug
Measured
286
0.130
NA
NA
NA
286
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Run 8
Rinse and filter, ug
HN03 impinger, ug
Fourth impinger, ug
KMn04 impinger, ug
HCI rinse, ug
Total, ug
448
1.55
NA
NA
NA
450
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Run 9
Rinse and filter, ug
HN03 impinger, ug
Fourth impinger, ug
KMn04 impinger, ug
HCI rinse, ug
Total, ug
73.0
0.232
NA
NA
NA
73.2
Concentration, ug/dscm
Emissions, g/hr
Blank
Rinse and filter, ug
Rinse and filter, ug
HN03 impinger, ug
Fourth impinger, ug
KMn04 impinger, ug
HCI rinse, ug
0.360
<0.067
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cd
Blank Correct
286
0.130
NA
NA j
NA
286
176
0.13
448
1.55
NA
NA !
NA
449
213
0.17
72.6
0.232 !
NA !
NA
NA |
72.9
39.8
0.033
Measured
2230
1.04
NA
NA
NA
2231
1270
6.16
NA
NA
NA
1276
696
1.44
NA
NA
NA
697
0.820
0.825
N/A
N/A
N/A
INLET
Pb
Blank Correct '
2229
0.22
NA
NA j
NA
2229
1371
0.99 j
,
1269
5.34
NA j
NA !
NA <
1275
606 j
0.47 !
_____ _,„.,.,„..„,,_,-— j-,— ,
695 <
0.62 j<
NA '<
NA <
NA <
696 j
380
0.32 I
1
j
,
j
Hg
Measured
1.78
288
5.12
157
94.8
547
1.14
27.7
1.77
7.15
1.00
38.8
0.400
5.33
2.10
1.00
1.00
9.83
<0.400
<3.00
<0.200
<0.800
<1.00
Blank Correct
1.78
288
5.12
157
94.8
547
336
0.24
1.14
27.7
1.77
7.15
1.00
38.8
18.4
0.014
0.400
5.33
2.10
1.00
1.00
9.83
5.37
0.0045
OUTLET
Cd
Measured Blank Correct
99.0
0.222
NA
NA
NA
99.2
166
0.667
NA
NA
NA
167
31.6
0.383
NA
NA
NA.
32.0
(Run 8, outlet only)
<0.100
(Run 9, outlet only)
<0.100
98.6
0.222
NA
NA
NA
98.9
126.4
0.083
166
0.667
NA
NA
NA
167
127
0.11
31.6
0.383
NA
NA
NA
32.0
32.2
0.027
Pb
l Hg
' Measured Blank Correct • Measured
976 975
2.06 1.24
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
978 976
1249
0.82
480 479
2.53 2.53
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
483 482
367
0.33
195 194
1.39 0.57
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
196 195
196
0.16
(Run 8, outlet only)
0.740
(Run 9, outlet only)
0.600
I
, 0.836
j 70.6
.< 2.06
j 108
, 2.83
| 184
•
I
!
j< 0.400
! 12.3
j 1.36
! 2.60
|< loo
! 17.7
i
I
!
i
;< o.4oo
j< 5.52
'< 0.192
j 1.02
,< 1.00
| 8.13
l
!
Blank Correct
0.836
70.6
2.06
108
2.83
184
236
0.16
0.400
12.3
1.36
2.60
102
17.7
13.5
0.0121
0.400
5.52
0.192
1.02
1.00
8.13
8.18
0.0069
(Run 8, outlet only)
| <0.400
(Run 9, outlet only)
j <0.400
,
I
l
MRI-AEDNR495I-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 19 of 33
Table 3-13. PCDD/PCDF Homologue Emissions—Condition 1
INLET
Analyte
Sample volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate {dscm/min}
Total Dioxins (DQ)
TCDD
PeCDD
HxCDD
HpCDD
OCDD
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total Furans (DO)
TCDF
PeCDF
HxCDF
HpCDF
OCDF
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total Dioxin/Furans
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run 1
. 1.884
15
29.6
13.4
67.4
73.4
156
339.8
0.3398
0.1804
2.7
200
119
108
30.7
14.7
472
0.472
0.251
3.8
0.431
6.5
Run 2
1.739
13
550
877
1380
907
540
4254
4.254
2.446
32
1850
1430
2860
2150
485
8775
8.775
5.046
66
7.492
97
Run 3
1983
15
207
898
2330
2290
883
6608
6.608
3.332
50
1030
1040
1530
911
221
4732
4.732
2.386
36
5.719
86
Run 10
f.766
13
223
574
1620
2370
2400
7187
7.187
4.070
53
2546
2150
3330
2990
875
11891
11.891
6.733
88
10.803
140
Run 1
1.316
17
1150
1450
1610
1480
1010
6700
6.700
5.091
87
2710
1310
2120
2450
674
9264
9.264
7.040
120
12.131
206
OUTLET
Run 2
1.385
19
6670
7490
3850
954
530
19494
19.494
14.08
267
2190
788
694
317
237
4226
4.226
3.051
58
17.13
325
Run 3
1.592
21
6970
12300
8470
2460
526
30726
30.726
19.30
405
2550
1150
1120
846
178
5844
5.844
3.671
77
22.97
482
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Table 3-14. 2,3,7,8-Substituted PCDD/PCDF Emissions - Condition 1
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 20 of 33
INLET
Analyte
Sample volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate (dscm/min)
2.3.7.8-SubstitutedDioxins (pa)
2,3,7,8-TCDD <
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD <
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD <
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
2.3.7. 8-Substituted Furans (DC)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF <
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF <
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total 2.3.7.8-substituted dioxin/furan
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run 1
1.884
15
2.6
5.18
4.46
6.19
5.22
39
156
219
0.219
0.116
1.7
9.77
7.24
13.5 b
10.9
11.4
16
6.47
29.2
4.85
HZ
124
0.124
0.0658
1.0
0.182
2.7
Run 2
1739
13
9.17
< 43
55.6
99.2
71.9
465
540
1284
1.284
0.738
10
85.2
67.6
190
306
262
483
211
1380
193
4S5
3663
3.663
2.106
27
2.845
37
Run 3
1.983
15
< 7.75
45.2
59.5
124
85.5
800
883
2005
2.005
1.011
15
40
55.2
131 b
126
144
250
100
414
108
221
1589
1.589
0.8014
12
1.812
27
Run 10
1766
13
< 13.6
< 58.5
81.8
118
83.8
1080
2400
3836
3.836
2.172
28
98.6
117
271 b
280
312
549
162
1570
266
875
4501
4.501
2.548
33
4.720
61
Run 1
1.316
17
< 9.75
44.2
55.7
117
88.4
737
1010
2062
2.062
1.567
27
74.3
51.2
146
224
191
397
144
1500
227
674
3629
3.629
2.757
47
4.324
74
OUTLET
Run 2
1.385
19
< 26.7
222
147
322
321
557
530
2126
2.126
1.535
29
112
51.9
99 b
89.2
80.9
117
96.1
169
99.7
23Z
1152
1.152
0.8316
16
2.366
45
Run 3
1592
21
12.7
240
176
565
682
1350
526
3552
3.552
2.231
47
53.4
41.2
119 b
108
99.7
188
64.6
516
74.5
US
1442
1.442
0.9060
19
3.137
66
Note: a "<" symbol indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
b Field Surrogate recovery low.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 21 of 33
Table 3-15. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 1, Inlet
Toxicity
Equivalence
Analyte Factor *
Sample volume, (dscm).
Stack How rate, (dscm/min)
Dioxins
2,3,7,8-TCDD 1 <
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5 <
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 <
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDI 0.001
Total
Furans
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 <
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 <
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF 0.001
Total
Total Dioxin/Furan Equivalent
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.0026
0.00259
0.000446
0.00062
0.000522
0.00039
0.000156
0.0073
0.000977
0.000362
0.00675"
0.00109
0.00114
0.0016
0.000647
0.000292
0.0000485
0.0000147
0.0129
1 Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1.664
15
< 0.0014
< 0.00137
< 0.000237
0.00033
0.000277
0.00021
0.0000828
0.0039
0.000519
0.000192
0.00358
< 0.000579
0.000605
0.00085
0.000343
< 0.000155
0.0000257
0.00000780
0.00686
0.16
Run
Amount
(nq)
0.00917
< 0.022
0.00556
0.00992
0.00719
0.00465
0.000540
0.059
0.00852
0.00338
0.0950
0.0306
0.0262
0.0483
< 0.021 1
0.01380
0.00193
0.000485
0.2493
2 Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
173$
13
0.00527
< 0.012
0.00320
0.00570
0.00413
0.00267
0.000311
0.034
0.00490
0.00194
0.0546
0.0176
0.0151
0.0278
< 0.0121
0.007936
0.00111
0.000279
0.14337
2.3
Run 3
Amount
(ng)
< 0.00775 <
0.0226
0.00595
0.0124
0.00855
0.00800
0.000883
0.0661
0.0040
0.00276
0.0655"
0.0126
0.0144
0.0250
0.0100
0.00414
0.00108
0.000221
0.1397
Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1.983
15
0.00391
0.0114
0.00300
0.00625
0.00431
0.00403
0.000445
0.0333
0.0020
0.00139
0.0330
0.00635
0.00726
0.0126
0.00504
0.00209
0.000545
0.000111
0.0704
1.6
Run
Amount
(ng)
< 0.0136
< 0.0293
0.00818
0.0118
0.00838
0.01080
0.002400
0.0844
0.00986
0.00585
0.136"
0.0280
0.0312
0.0549
0.0162
0.01570
0.00266
0.000875
0.30
10 Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
i.m
13
< 0.00770
< 0.0166
0.00463
0.00668
0.00475
0.006116
0.001359
0.0478
0.00558
0.00331
0.0767
0.0159
0.0177
0.0311
0.00917
0.008890
0.00151
0.000495
0.17
2.8
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
a 1989 EPA Factors.
" Field Surrogate recovery low.
MRI-AEDXR4951 -08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 22 of 33
Table 3-16. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 1, Outlet
Toxicity
Equivalence
Analyte Factor a
Sample volume {dscm)
. Stack flow fate (dscift/mlft)
Dioxins
2,3,7,8-TCDD 1 <
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD 0.001
Total
Furans
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF 0.001
Total
Total Dioxin/Furan Eauivalent
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.00975
0.0221
0.00557
0.0117
0.00884
0.00737
0.001010
0.0663
0.00743
0.00256
0.0730
0.0224
0.0191
0.0397
0.0144
0.01500
0.00227
0.000674
0.1965
1 Outlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1.316
^7
< 0.00741
0.0168
0.00423
0.00889
0.00672
0.00560
0.0007675
0.0504
0.00565
0.00195
0.0555
0.0170
0.0145
0.0302
0.0109
0.01140
0.00172
0.000512
0.1493
3.4
Run
Amount
(ng)
< 0.0267
0.111
0.0147
0.0322
0.0321
0.00557
0.000530
0.2228
0.0112
0.00260
0.050b
0.00892
0.00809
0.0117
0.00961
0.00169
0.000997
0.000237
0.105
2 Outlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1.385
19
< 0.0193
0.0801
0.0106
0.0232
0.0232
0.00402
0.000383
0.1609
0.00809
0.00187
0.036
0.00644
0.00584
0.00845
0.00694
0.00122
0.000720
0.000171
0.075
4.5
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.0127
0.120
0.0176
0.0565
0.0682
0.01350
0.000526
0.289
0.00534
0.00206
0.0595b
0.0108
0.00997
0.0188
0.00646
0.00516
0.000745
0.000178
0.1190
3 Outlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1592
21
0.00798
0.0754
0.0111
0.0355
0.0428
0.008480
0.000330
0.1815
0.00335
0.00129
0.0374
0.00678
0.00626
0.0118
0.00406
0.00324
0.000468
0.000112
0.0748
5.4
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
a 1989 EPA Factors.
MR|.AED\R495I-08-03 SJ.wpd
b Field Surrogate recovery low.
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 23 of 33
Table 3-17. PCDD/PCDF Homologue Emissions—Condition 2
Analyte
3ample volume (dscm)
Stack flow? rate (d$cm/min)
Total Dioxins (oq)
TCDD
PeCDD
HxCDD
HpCDD
OCDD
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total Furans (oq)
TCDF
PeCDF
HxCDF
HpCDF
OCDF
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total Dioxin/Furans
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run 4
2.73
16
316
713
1660
1400
672
4761
4.761
1.744
28
2030
1570
2540
1660
384
8184
8.184
2.998
48
4.742
76
INLET
Run 5
2.263
17
625
983
1580
1130
617
4935
4.935
2.181
37
5880
3790
3241
1320
215
14446
14.446
6.384
109
8.564
146
Run 6
2.2*6
16
560
1240
2120
1760
1060
6740
6.740
3.042
49
5540
5710
5780
2630
487
20147
20.147
9.092
145
12.133
194
OUTLET
Run 4 Run 5
1.476
19
10900
11700
6510
1600
613
31323
31.323
21.22
403
5940
2000
1120
355
198
9613
9.613
6.513
124
27.734
527 .
Run 6
1.786
25
7710
12400
9580
3250
968
33908
33.908
18.99
475
8960
4170
2025
821
190
16166
16.166
9.052
226
28.04
701
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Table 3-18. 2,3,7,8-Substituted PCDD/PCDF Emissions - Condition 2
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 24 of 33
Analyte
Sample volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate (dscm/min)
2.3.7.8-SubstitutedDioxins (pa)
2,3,7,8-TCDD <
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD <
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
2.3.7.8-Substituted Furans (pg)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total 2.3.7.8-substituted dioxin/furan
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run 4
2.73
16
6.48
46.1
68.8
112
78.9
605
672
1589
1.589
0.5822
9.3
73
66
211 b
253
224
428
162
966
168
384
2935
2.935
1.075
17
1.657
27
INLET
Run 5
2.263
17
25.3
< 102
98.6
138
103
575
en
1659
1.659
0.7331
12
214
215
450
312
339
459
146
707
121
215
3178
3.178
1.404
24
2.137
36
Run 6
2.276
16
39.5
123
122
161
136
826
1060
2468
2.468
1.113
18
302
343
680
553
603
784
284
1410
287
4fiZ
5733
5.733
2.587
41
3.701
59
Run 4
1.476
19
38.2
300
204
468
447
867
613
2937
2.937
1.990
38
165
84.2
222 b
110
114
175
86.9
240
83.5
198
1479
1.479
1.002
19
2.992
57
OUTLET
5 Run 6
1.786
25
47
330
261
606
504
1440
968
4156
4.156
2.327
58
242
163
490
214
235
408
118
522
93.2
190
2675
2.675
1.498
37
3.825
96
Note: a "<" symbol indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
1 Field Surrogate recovery low.
MRI-AED\R495I-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 25 of 33
Table 3-19. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results—Condition 2, Inlet
Toxicity
Equivalence
Analyte Factor a
Samp/e volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate (dscm/min)
Dioxins
2,3,7,8-TCDD 1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDC 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDl 0.001
Total
Furans
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF 0.001
Total
Total Dioxin/Furan Equivalent
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.00648
0.0231
0.00688
0.0112
0.00789
0.00605
0.000672
0.0622
0.0073
0.0033
0.1 06b
0.0253
0.0224
0.0428
0.0162
0.00966
0.00168
0.000384
0.235
4 Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
2.73
16
0.00237
0.00844
0.00252
0.00410
0.00289
0.00222
0.000246
0.02279
0.0027
0.0012
0.0386
0.00927
0.00821
0.0157
0.00593
0.00354
0.000615
0.000141
0.0859
1.7
Run 5
Amount
(ng)
0.0253
0.0510
0.00986
0.0138
0.0103
0.00575
0.000617
0.1166
0.0214
0.0108
0.225
0.0312
0.0339
0.0459
0.0146
0.00707
0.00121
0.000215
0.391
Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
2.2^3
17
0.0112
0.0225
0.00436
0.00610
0.00455
0.00254
0.000273
0.0515
0.00946
0.00475
0.0994
0.0138
0.0150
0.0203
0.00645
0.00312
0.000535
0.0000950
0.1729
3.8
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.0395
0.0615
0.0122
0.0161
0.0136
0.00826
0.001060
0.1522
0.0302
0.0172
0.340
0.0553
0.0603
0.0784
0.0284
0.01410
0.00287
0.000487
0.627
6 Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
ZZ1Q
16
0.0178
0.0278
0.00551
0.00727
0.00614
0.00373
0.0004783
0.0687
0.0136
0.00774
0.153
0.0250
0.0272
0.0354
0.0128
0.006363
0.00130
0.000220
0.283
5.6
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
a 1989 EPA Factors.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
' Field Surrogate recovery low.
-------
Table 3-20. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results - Condition 2, Outlet
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 26 of 33
Toxicity
Equivalence
Analyte Factor a
Sample volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate (dscm/min)
Dioxins
2,3,7,8-TCDD 1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD 0.001
Total
Furans
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF 0.001
Total
Total Dioxin/Furan Equivalent
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run 4 Outlet Run 5 Outlet
Amount
(ng)
0.0382
0.150
0.0204
0.0468
0.0447
0.00867
O.QOQ613
0.309
0.0165
0.00421
0.111 b
0.0110
0.0114
0.0175
0.00869
0.00240
0.000835
0.000198
0.184
Cone. Amount Cone.
(ng/dscm) (ng) (ng/dscm)
1476
19
0.0259
0.102
0.0138
0.0317
0.0303
0.00587
0.000415
0.210
0.0112
0.00285
0.0752
0.00745
0.00772
0.0119
0.00589
0.00163
0.000566
Q.000134
0.1245
6.3
Run 6 Outlet
Amount
(ng)
0.047
0.165
0.0261
0.0606
0.0504
0.01440
0.000968
0.364
0.0242
0.00815
0.245
0.0214
0.0235
0.0408
0.0118
0.00522
0.000932
0.000190
0.381
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1786
25
0.026
0.0924
0.0146
0.0339
0.0282
0.008063
0.000542
0.204
0.0135
0.00456
0.137
0.0120
0.0132
0.0228
0.00661
0.00292
0.000522
O.QOQ1Q6
0.213
10.4
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
'1989 EPA Factors.
b Field Surrogate recovery low.
MRI-AEDXR4951 08-OJ S3.*pd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 27 of 33
Table 3-21. PCDD/PCDF Homologue Emissions—Condition 3
Analyte
Sample volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate (d$cm/min)
Total Dioxins (DO)
TCDD
PeCDD
HxCDD
HpCDD
OCDD
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total Furans (DQ}
TCDF
PeCDF
HxCDF
HpCDF
OCDF
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total Dioxin/Furans
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run?
7.S26
14
407
914
2270
3300
3370
10261
10.261
5.328
75
5070
4235
5450
3930
1390
20075
20.075
10.42
145.9
15.75
221
INLET
Run8
2.W4
13
921
1960
3860
3430
2150
12321
12.321
5.856
76
5110
4120
4980
2980
706
17896
17.896
8.506
111
14.362
187
Run9
i.631
14
690
1570
2490
2210
1240
8200
8.200
4.478
63
4180
3130
3810
2170
343
13633
13.633
7.446
104
1 1 .924
167
Run 7
1.473
20
7750
8440
6130
2290
920
25530
25.530
17.33
347
14500
6400
3590
1160
126
25776
25.776
17.50
350
34.83
697
OUTLET
Run8
£386
14
6630
8390
6580
2330
898
24828
24.828
10.41
146
10200
4270
2740
1130
165
18505
18.505
7.756
109
18.16
254
Run 9
1.402
18
3300
4670
3790
1440
649
13849
13.849
9.878
178
5830
2550
1790
729
112
11011
11.011
7.854
141
17.732
319
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
MR]-ABD\R495I-08-03 SJ.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 28 of 33
Table 3-22. 2,3,7,8-Substituted PCDD/PCDF Emissions—Condition 3
Analyte
Sample volume (ctscm)
Stack flow rate (dscm/min)
2.3.7,8-SubstitutedDioxins (DO)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD <
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
2.3.7,8-Substituted Furans (DO)
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF
Total amount (pg)
Total amount (ng)
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Total 2,3.7.8-substituted dioxin/furan
Concentration (ng/dscm)
Emission rate (ng/min)
Note: a "<" symbol indicates analyte
b Field Surrogate recovery low.
Run 7
1926
14
23.4
92.5
121
171
124
1500
3370
5402
5.402
2.805
39
155
188
464°
495
527
930
240
2140
333
1390
6862
6.862
3.563
50
6.368
89
not observed
INLET
Run 8
2.104
13
12.4
105
160
266
178
1680
2150
4551
4.551
2.163
28
116
143
544
440
459
845
217
1610
290
706
5370
5.370
2.552
33
4.715
61
above the detection
Run 9
1.831
14
17.6
92
110
174
125
1050
1240
2809
2.809
1.534
21
136
150
411
342
383
757
195
1150
180
343
4047
4.047
2.210
31
3.744
52
limit.
Run 7
1.473
20
64
310
198
399
303
1090
920
3284
3.284
2.229
45
384
233
629
326
332
494
98
835
64
126
3521
3.521
2.390
48
4.620
92
OUTLET
Run 8
2,386
14
58.1
324
220
439
336
1160
898
3435
3.435
1.440
20
326
192
517
260
286
465
107
796
78.9
165
3193
3.193
1.338
19
2.778
39
Run 9
1.402
1B
< 27.8
171
111
256
200
708
649
2123
2.123
1.514
27
161
109
290°
171
182
305
67.9
474
50.9
112
1923
1.923
1.371
25
2.886
52
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpcl
-------
Table 3-23. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results - Condition 3, Inlet
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 29 of 33
Toxicity
Equivalence
Analyte Factor a
Sample volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate (dscm/min)
Dioxins
2,3,7,8-TCDD 1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCD 0.001
Total
Furans
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCD 0.001
Total
Total Dioxin/Furan Equivalent
Emission rate (ng/min)
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.0234
0.0463
0.0121
0.0171
0.0124
0.01500
0.003370
0.1296
0.0155
0.00940
0.232 b
0.0495
0.0527
0.0930
0.0240
0.02140
0.00333
0.001390
0.502
7 Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
7.926
14
0.0121
0.0240
0.00628
0.00888
0.006438
0.007788
0.001750
0.0673
0.00805
0.00488
0.120
0.0257
0.0274
0.0483
0.0125
0.01111
0.00173
0.0007217
0.261
4.6
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.0124
0.0525
0.0160
0.0266
0.0178
0.01680
0.002150
0.1443
0.0116
0.00715
0.272
0.0440
0.0459
0.0845
0.0217
0.01610
0.00290
0.000706
0.507
8 Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
2.704
13
0.00589
0.0250
0.00760
0.0126
0.00846
0.007985
Q.QQ1Q22
0.0686
0.00551
0.00340
0.129
0.0209
0.0218
0.0402
0.0103
0.007652
0.00138
0.000336
0.241
4.0
Run 9
Amount
(ng)
0.0176
0.0460
0.0110
0.0174
0.0125
0.01050
0.001240
0.1162
0.0136
0.00750
0.206
0.0342
0.0383
0.0757
0.0195
0.01150
0.00180
0.000343
0.408
Inlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
7,837
14
0.00961
0.0251
0.00601
0.00950
0.00683
0.005735
0.0006772
0.0635
0.00743
0.00410
0.112
0.0187
0.0209
0.0413
0.0106
0.006281
0.000983
0.000187
0.223
4.0
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
a 1989 EPA Factors.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S3 w[xi
-------
Table 3-24. 2,3,7,8-TCDD Equivalent Results - Condition 3, Outlet
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 30 of 33
Analyte
Toxicity
Equivalence
Factor3
Run
Amount
(ng)
Sample volume (dscm)
Stack flow rate
Dioxins
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
Total
Furans
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7, 8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF
Total
(dscm/min)
1
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.001
0.1
0.05
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.064
0.155
0.0198
0.0399
0.0303
0.01090
0.000920
0.321
0.0384
0.0117
0.315
0.0326
0.0332
0.0494
0.0098
0.00835
0.00064
O.QQQ126
0.499
7 Outlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1.473
20
0.043
0.105
0.0134
0.0271
0.0206
0.007400
0.000625
0.218
0.0261
0.00791
0.214
0.0221
0.0225
0.0335
0.0067
0.00567
0.00043
0.0000855
0.339
Run
Amount
(ng)
0.0581
0.162
0.0220
0.0439
0.0336
0.01160
0.000898
0.332
0.0326
0.00960
0.259
0.0260
0.0286
0.0465
0.0107
0.00796
0.000789
0.000165
0.421
8 Outlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
2.386
14
0.0244
0.0679
0.00922
0.0184
0.0141
0.004862
0.000376
0.1392
0.0137
0.00402
0.108
0.0109
0.0120
0.0195
0.00448
0.00334
0.000331
0.0000692
0.177
Run 9
Amount
(ng)
0.0278
0.0855
0.0111
0.0256
0.0200
0.00708
O.Q00649
0.1777
0.0161
0.00545
0.145 b
0.0171
0.0182
0.0305
0.00679
0.00474
0.000509
0.000112
0.245
Outlet
Cone.
(ng/dscm)
1,402
18
0.0198
0.0610
0.00792
0.0183
0.0143
0.00505
0.000463
0.1268
0.0115
0.00389
0.103
0.0122
0.0130
0.0218
0.00484
0.00338
0.000363
0.0000799
0.174
Total Dioxin/Furan Equivalent
Emission rate (ng/min)
11
4.4
5.4
Note: a "<" sign indicates analyte not observed above the detection limit.
" 1989 EPA Factors.
b Field Surrogate recovery low.
MRI-AEDNR495I OS 03 S3.wpJ
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 31 of 33
Table 3-25. Summary CEMS and Opacity of Results
Analyte
Oxygen (%dv)
Carbon dioxide (%dv)
Sulfur dioxide (ppmdv)
Nitrogen oxides (ppmdv)
Carbon monoxide (ppmdv)
Visible emissions (% opacity)
max. 6-min. value
run average
Oxygen (%dv)
Carbon dioxide (%dv)
Sulfur dioxide (ppmdv)
Nitrogen oxides (ppmdv)
Carbon monoxide (ppmdv)
Visible emissions (% opacity)
max. 6-min. value
run average
Oxygen (%dv)
Carbon dioxide (%dv)
Sulfur dioxide (ppmdv)
Nitrogen oxides (ppmdv)
Carbon monoxide (ppmdv)
Visible emissions (% opacity)
max. 6-min. value
run average
Run 1
inlet outlet
9.78 11.36
6.92 6.13
9.17 8.54
132.35 119.59
1.91 1.42
0.00
0.00
Run 4
inlet outlet
8.56 9.31
7.76 7.29
17.62 16.19
113.18 102.92
0.16 0.19
0.00
0.00
Run 7
inlet outlet
7.24 8.78
9.55 8.37
48.46 38.96
128.09 113.18
15.73 10.50
6.04
0.78
Secondary Chamber
Run 2
inlet outlet
10.43 11.85
6.50 5.81
1.45 0.00
110.62 97.42
2.99 2.41
0.00
0.00
Secondary Chamber
Run 5
inlet outlet
8.25 9.79
8.76 7.68
20.03 16.79
176.69 140.46
0.15 0.04
7.71
0.99
Secondary Chamber
Run 8
inlet outlet
7.53 8.94
8.21 7.34
33.71 26.84
79.62 70.97
1.49 1.48
13.96
0.92
Temperature: 1400 F
Run 3
inlet outlet
9.22 10.37
7.56 6.88
16.66 14.60
96.31 84.87
1.78 1.38
3.75
0.33
Temperature: 1600 F
Run 6
inlet outlet
8.90 10.50
7.80 6.88
15.18 12.48
88.23 75.09
0.68 0.58
0.00
0.00
Temperature: 1800 F
Run 9
inlet outlet
7.71 9.48
8.16 7.07
17.68 16.12
85.29 73.86
0.00 0.46
12.50
0.72
Average
inlet outlet
9.81 11.19
6.99 6.27
9.09 7.71
113.09 100.63
2.23 1.74
1.25
0.11
Average
inlet outlet
8.57 9.87
8.11 7.28
17.61 15.15
126.03 106.16
0.33 0.27
2.57
0.33
Average
inlet outlet
7.49 9.07
8.64 7.59
33.28 27.31
97.67 86.00
5.74 4.15
10.83
0.81
MR]-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 32 of 33
Table 3-26. Process and Test Data
Run No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Outdoor
Average Gas Volume Barometric Outdoor Air Relative
SCC Temp. Burned during Pressure Temperature Humidity
Date °F Test (Ft3) (in. Hg) (°F) (%)
6/11/99
6/12/99
6/13/99
6/13/99
6/14/99
6/15/99
6/15/99
6/16/99
6/17/99
6/17/99
1425
1475
1450
1660
1656
1645
1845
1838
1838
1470
2885
3030
3435
2820
ND
ND
2680
3810
ND
1845
30.20
30.23
30.09
30.02
29.78
29.91
29.90
29.95
29.95
29.97
75
78
70
77
77
81
79
71
65
65
39.6
54.8
85.6
73.4
69.3
40.0
40.1
44.1
72.0
69.6
Presence
of Odors
None
None
None
None
None
None
ND
None
ND
None
ND indicates that no data was available.
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 S3.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 3
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 33 of 33
Table 3-27. Summary of Body and Container Characteristics
Run
No.
Date
Body Container Body
Weight Weight Embalmed?
(Ib) (Ib) (Y/N) Body Description
Container Type
Body Wrappings, Container
Contents
1 6/11/99 157 15
2 6/12/99 163 85
3 6/13/99 182 10
4 6/13/99 199 10
5 6/14/99 180 100
6 6/15/99 188 30
7 6/15/99 140 100
no
8 6/16/99 200
10
9 6/17/99 105 10
10 6/17/99 132 10
No clothes, white plastic sheet
No clothes, cloth sheet, white plastic
sheets
Light white plastic pouch, note on
box "no jewelry", shoulder joint,
eyeglass rims, partials, and
unknown metal found in remains
no 55 year old male Brown fiberboard, no wood Light white plastic pouch
no
no
yes
no
yes
78 year old male, White fiberboard, chipboard
lean build . bottom
70 year old female White fiberboard, wooden
inserts, chipboard on sides,
bottom, and top
91 year old male Brown fiberboard, no wood
74 year old male,
lean build
76 year old male
65 year old male
Cloth covered casket, particle
board sides, bottom and top,
fabric lining, plastic fiber
stuffing, white plastic sheet
Fiberboard with pine base,
chipboard bottom
Cloth covered casket, particle
board sides, bottom and top,
fabric lining, plastic fiber
stuffing, white plastic sheet
no 88 year old female Brown fiberboard, no wood
no 88 year old male Brown fiberboard, no wood
no 58 year old female Brown fiberboard, no wood
Body dressed in a suit, leather
shoes
White plastic sheets
Body dressed in hospital gown,
cloth sheet
Light white plastic pouch, surgical
gloves
Light white plastic pouch
Light white plastic pouch
MRI-AED\R495I-08-03 SJ.wpd
-------
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 1 of 9
Section 4.
Sampling, Analytical, and Process Data Collection
Procedures
The sampling, analysis, and process data collection procedures used for this test
project are described in this section. The published methods and MRI Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) used are cited. Details providing clarification and any modifications to
or deviations from the published methods are presented in this section. Otherwise, the
cited methods were followed.
4.1 Sampling Procedures
The samples collected required the use of four (4) sampling systems at both sampling
locations:
• EPA Method 23 isokinetic sampling train for PCDDs and PCDFs, along with an
EPA Method 3B integrated gas sampling train for carbon dioxide (CO2) and
oxygen (O2).
• EPA Method 29 isokinetic sampling train for metals (Cd, Hg, and Pb), along with
an EPA Method 3B integrated gas sampling train.
• EPA Method 26A isokinetic sampling train for PM and HC1, along with an EPA
Method 3B integrated gas sampling train.
• EPA Instrumental Analyzer Methods 6C, 7E, and 10 sampling and analytical
system for SO2, NOX, and CO. Method 3A instrumentation was also added for
CO2 and O2 data collection for normalizing the SO2, NOX, and CO results if
needed.
The following methods were employed in the use and operation of these sampling
trains and systems.
4.1.1 Sample and Velocity Traverses
Method 1 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 (basis for MRI SOP MRI-8401) was used to
establish traverse (sampling) points at the test locations for the traversing sampling trains.
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 2 of 9
However, the use of a total of 12 traverse points (6 on a diameter) instead of the 24
specified in Method 1 for the known proximity of flow disturbances at the test locations
was performed as planned.
A check for absence of cyclonic flow was not conducted at the test locations prior to
the start of sampling or during the test project. If any cyclonic flow conditions were found
at the test locations during process operation, it would likely change in intensity throughout
a cycle as velocity and temperature fluctuated and would have to be checked throughout a
complete cycle. Also, the unit was not designed to provide emission measurement test
locations and could not be modified without significant changes in design if cyclonic flow
problems were found.
4.1.2 Determination of Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rates
Method 2 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 (basis for SOP MRI-8402) was used to
measure gas velocities and volumetric flow rates with Type S pilot tubes that are
components of the traversing sampling trains. Pilot tubes meeting the dimensional
specifications in the method were used. However, the pilot tube coefficients were adjusted
for blockage in ihe gas slream caused by ihe probe assemblies used during sampling. An
average adjusted coefficienl for each such pilol lube was calculated in a spreadsheel using
procedures cited in Melhod 2.
An aneroid barometer calibrated againsl a mercury barometer was used lo measure
almospheric pressure al ihe sampling localions.
4.1.3 Determination of Dry Gas Molecular Weight and Emission Rate
Correction Factors
Melhod 3B in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 (basis for SOP MRI-8406) was used lo
colled mulli-poinl, integrated gas bag samples simullaneously wilh Ihe Iraversing/
isokinelic sampling for delerminalion of dry gas molecular weight The integrated gas
sampling apparalus used lo collecl Ihe samples is a componenl of each Iraversing sampling
Irain. Integrated gas samples were exlracled al a conslanl rale from Ihe exhausl of a
Iraversing sampling Irain jusl upslream from Ihe oullel of ihe dry gas meter oullel orifice.
MRI has determined Ihrough investigation lhal Ihe impinger conlenls of all Irains used did
nol cause interferences (e.g., loss of carbon dioxide) during sample collection. Also, in
less lhan one minute after Ihe slart of Iraversing/isokinelic sampling, Ihe entire Iraversing
Irain is purged wilh sampled gas, and integrated gas sampling can begin. Sampling was
conducted al a conslanl rale Ihroughoul Ihe run while Ihe Iraversing/isokinelic sampling
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 3 of 9
was in progress. Each integrated gas sampling apparatus was leak checked before and after
each test run.
4.1.4 Determination of Moisture Content
Method 4 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60, incorporated as part of Methods 23, 26A, and
29, was used to determine the moisture (water vapor) content of the gas stream. Moisture
collected during sampling was determined gravimetrically from the difference between the
initial and final weights of all of the impingers in a train, including the resin cartridge,
where used.
4.1.5 Sampling for PCDDs and PCDFs
Method 23 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 (basis for SOP MRI-8404) was used to
collect samples for dioxin and furan analysis. Clarifications of and modifications to the
method are included in the following discussion.
Quartz glass nozzles and probe liners were used in water-cooled probes. The internal
surface of the compression fittings used for connecting nozzles to probe liners are
permanently coated with abrasion-resistant Teflon® to prevent sample gas contact with the
stainless steel, and the connections are positioned within the water-cooled section of each
probe.
Heat traced, l/2-inch O.D. with 1/a- inch wall Teflon® tubing was used as a sample
transfer line (STL) between the probe liner outlet and the filter holder inlet in all of the
trains because the proximity of adjacent test ports and other obstructions would not allow
sampling with trains assembled in the normal manner. A glass coupling was used to
connect the STL tubing to the probe liner outlet while the other end of the tube was
connected directly to the filter holder inlet. The STL was maintained at 248±25°F during
sampling. Samples were recovered from the STL in the same manner as for the probe, as
specified in Method 23.
No cyclone/flask assembly was necessary in front of the filter holder to prevent
overloading the filter. Filter supports in the filter holders were Teflon®-coated, stainless
steel screening. Quartz fiber filters having the same specifications described in the method
were used. Each cartridge (sorbent trap) was loaded with approximately 65 grams of
XAD-2 resin.
Two silica gel impingers were used in each train. This was done to minimize any need
to swap those components during a test run.
MR1-AEDVR4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 4 of 9
Sample recovery procedures followed those specified in the method, i.e., using acetone
and methylene chloride for rinsing train components. The toluene QA rinses were also
analyzed for dioxins and furans. The condensate collected in the impingers was not
recovered. All samples were stored and shipped cold at water ice temperature.
4.1.6 Sampling for Metals
Method 29 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 (basis for SOP MRI-8405) was used to
collect samples for metals analysis. Clarifications of and modifications to the method are
also included in the following discussion.
Quartz glass nozzles and probe liners were used in water-cooled probes. The internal
surface of the compression fittings used for connecting nozzles to probe liners are
permanently coated with abrasion-resistant Teflon® to prevent sample gas contact with the
stainless steel, and the connections are positioned within the water-cooled section of each
probe.
Heat traced, Vz-inch O.D. with Va- inch wall Teflon® tubing was used as a sample
transfer line (STL) between the probe liner outlet and the filter holder inlet in all of the
trains because the proximity of adjacent test ports and other obstructions would not allow
sampling with trains assembled in the normal manner. A glass coupling was used to
connect the STL tubing to the probe liner outlet while the other end of the tube was
connected directly to the filter holder inlet. The STL was maintained at 248±25°F during
sampling. Samples were recovered from the STL in the same manner as for the probe, as
specified in Method 29.
No cyclone/flask assembly was necessary in front of the filter holder to prevent
overloading the filter. Filter supports in the filter holders were 100% Teflon®. Quartz
fiber filters having the same specifications described in the method were used.
Two silica gel impingers were used in each train. This was done to minimize any need
to swap those components during a test run.
Sample recovery procedures followed those specified in the method. Adequate
quantities of recovery reagents used during recovery were saved for analysis for blank
correction purposes. All samples were stored cold at water ice temperature at the test site
(not required by the method), but were shipped and stored at the laboratory at room
temperature.
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 5 of 9
4.1.7 Sampling for Participate Matter and HCI
Method 26A in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 was used to collect samples for total
paniculate matter and HCI analysis. Clarifications of and modifications to the method are
included in the following discussion.
Quartz glass nozzles and probe liners were used in water-cooled probes. The internal
surface of the compression fittings used for connecting nozzles to probe liners are
permanently coated with abrasion-resistant Teflon® to prevent sample gas contact with the
stainless steel, and the connections are positioned within the water-cooled section of each
probe.
Heat traced, V2-inch O.D. with 1/e- inch wall Teflon® tubing was used as a sample
transfer line (STL) between the probe liner outlet and the filter holder inlet in all of the
trains because the proximity of adjacent test ports and other obstructions would not allow
sampling with trains assembled in the normal manner. A glass coupling was used to
connect the STL tubing to the probe liner outlet while the other end of the tube was
connected directly to the filter holder inlet. The STL was maintained at 248±25 °F during
sampling. Samples were recovered from the STL in the same manner as for the probe as
referred to in Method 26A and specified in Method 5 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60.
No cyclone/flask assembly was necessary in front of the filter holder to prevent
overloading the filter. Filter supports in the filter holders were 100% Teflon®. Quartz
fiber filters having the same specifications described in Method 5 were used.
Two silica gel impingers were used in each train. This was done to minimize any
need to swap those components during a test run. One additional empty impinger was
inserted between the last acidic impinger and the first caustic impinger. Material recovered
from that impinger was treated as if from a caustic impinger.
4.1.8 Sampling and Analysis for CO2, O2, CO, NOX, and SO2
Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, and 10 in Appendix A of 40 CFR 60 were used to sample and
analyze for CO2, O2, CO, NOX, and SO2. Clarifications of and modifications to the
methods are included in the following discussion.
All calibration gases were certified by EPA Protocol 1.
Gas was extracted through stainless steel probes (not water-cooled) fitted with
calibration valves at their outlets. The valve directs sampled gas through a heated glass-
fiber filter and a heated Teflon® sample transfer line to an ice-cooled condenser
MRI-AED«4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 6 of 9
conditioner for moisture removal. Conditioned sample passes through an unheated
Teflon® sample line to a gas sampling and distribution manifold system. The system
contains a pump for distributing sample to the analyzers.
The SO2 analyzer used was a Western Research Model 721AT photometric instrument
using a nondispersive ultraviolet analyzer operating on the principle of differential
absorption. The NOX analyzer systems used was a Thermo Electron Model 10AR
chemiluminescent NO/NOX analyzer with associated vacuum and bypass pumps. The CO
analyzer used was a Thermo Electron Model 48 gas filter correlation instrument using a
nondispersive infrared analyzer with gas filter correlation. The CO2 analyzer used was a
Horiba Model PIR-2000 NDIR instrument. The O2 analyzer used was a Teledyne Model
320A chemical cell instrument.
A Campbell Scientific Model CR10WP multi-channel system operating at a rate of
60 Hz was used for data acquisition with data storage at 1-minute average values.
All operating, calibration, and QC procedures and QC performance criteria specified
in the methods were used. CO analyzers were operated in accordance with applicable
procedures specified in Methods 6C and 10. Calibration of the CO analyzers was
conducted with the zero and the high level gases, and two mid-level gases were used
during the calibration error test.
At the beginning of each test day, the NOX, SO2, O2, and CO2 monitors on the sampling
system were zeroed using zero nitrogen, and spanned using a certified calibration gas with
a concentration of 80% to 100% of the instrument span. Following calibration, a mid-
range gas (40% to 60% of the instrument span) was introduced into each monitor. The
mid-range response did not exceed 2% of the instrument span, as required by EPA
reference Method 6C.
The CO monitor was zeroed using zero nitrogen and spanned using a known
concentration of CO in nitrogen. Following calibration, the CO monitor was challenged
with two additional gas concentrations corresponding to approximately 60% and 30% of
instrument span. All calibration gases were EPA Protocol 1 certified.
After calibrating the SO2, NOX, O2, and CO2 monitors, calibration gas was introduced
remotely through the probe to verify the absence of sampling system bias. The bias error
did not did not exceed 5% of the instrument span, as required by EPA Method 6C.
After each test run, zero nitrogen and either a mid- or high-range calibration gas were
introduced remotely through the sampling train system to each monitor to check for
calibration drift error. In accordance with Method 6C, the calibration drift did not exceed
3% of the instrument span for all valid test runs.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 7 of 9
4.1.9 Visible Emissions Determination
All visible emissions readings were performed using EPA Method 9 procedures
contained in USEPA 40 CFR 60, Appendix A. Appendix E of this report contains the raw
field data for the tests.
Evaluations of visible emissions from the crematorium stack were made by an
observer who was certified in accordance with Section 3.12.1, Subsection 1.3 of the
Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurements Systems: Volume III (EPA-
600/4-77-027b, August 1977). Appendix E contains the observer's certification.
The observer stood at a distance that provided a clear view of the emissions with the
sun oriented in the 140° sector to his back. In addition, the observer made observations
from a position at which the line of vision was approximately perpendicular to the plume
direction. For more detailed information on the observer position, see Appendix E.
Opacity observations were made at the point of greatest opacity in the portion of the
plume where condensed water vapor was not present. Opacity was read at 15-sec intervals,
and readings were made to the nearest 5% opacity with a minimum of 24 observations
being recorded. Readings were taken against a clearly visible background which gave the
highest degree of contrast. See Appendix E for more detailed information on the
observations.
4.2 Analytical Procedures
The analytical methodology and procedures used by MRI for this project were
standardized methods and EPA approved procedures. The analytical methods used on this
project are described below. The MRI SOPs pertaining to the methods are cited.
4.2.1 Analysis for PCDDs and PCDFs
The sample components recovered from the Method 23 trains (i.e., XAD-2 resin and
filter) were combined and extracted in the laboratory using Soxhlet extraction according to
MRI SOP CS154. The procedure for extraction involved placing the XAD-2 resin and
filter samples in the Soxhlet apparatus, spiking with 13C12 PCDD/PCDF internal
quantitation standards, and extracting with toluene for a minimum of 16 hours.
The train rinses were extracted with methylene chloride using a separatory funnel.
Following extraction, the methylene chloride was concentrated to a volume of 1 to 5 mL
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 8 of 9
and combined with the corresponding XAD-2/filter extract for each train. The combined
extract was split, with one-half analyzed for dioxins and furans, and one-half archived.
The sample split for dioxins and furans was taken through the remaining clean-up steps in
Method 23 modified per MRI SOP CS154, concentrated to 10 /iL with the addition of a
recovery standard, and provided for analysis by HRGC/HRMS.
Extracts were analyzed for dioxins and furans by SOP MRI-5405 based on the
procedures specified in Method 8290, "Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) by High-Resolution Gas Chromatography / High-
Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS)," in "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical (SW-846)." The target analyte amounts, surrogate and internal
standard recoveries were quantitated according to Method 23. No modifications of these
procedures were necessary.
4.2.2 Analysis for Metals
The sample components recovered from the Method 29 trains (i.e., rinses, filter, and
impinger contents) were digested, combined, and analyzed according to the procedures
specified in Method 29. Method 29 incorporates analytical methods published in "Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical (SW-846)." The SW-846
methods and MRI SOPs used for analysis are:
• Method 7000A and MRI SOP ASF-602 for graphite furnace atomic absorption
spectroscopy (GFAAS) with Method 7131A for cadmium and Method 7421 for
lead, and
• Method 7470A with MRI SOPs ASF-420 (preparation) and ASF-603 (analysis)
for cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CVAAS) for mercury.
No modifications of these procedures were necessary.
4.2.3 Analysis for Particulate Matter and HCI
The sample components recovered from the Method 26A train front half rinses and
filters were evaporated, desiccated, and weighed, as appropriate for particulate matter
determination, according to the procedures specified in Method 5 in Appendix A of 40
CFR 60. The same sample components recovered from the Method 29 trains for Run 4
inlet, and Runs 8 and 9 outlet were treated in the same manner. M29 train front half
acetone rinses preceded the nitric acid rinses. Following analysis for particulate matter,
acetone rinse residues and filters were submitted for metals analysis.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 4
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 9 of 9
The impinger contents recovered from the Method 26A trains were analyzed by ion
chromatography (1C) using the procedures specified in Method 26A. The contents of the
first three impingers were combined and analyzed for chloride to determine HC1 emissions.
Analysis of the fourth through sixth impingers (caustic solution) was not within the scope
of work for this project. No modifications of these procedures were required.
4.3 Process Data
Process operating parameters necessary to characterize process conditions were
monitored and recorded during each test run. Data were recorded manually about every
15 min to provide a record depicting process operations. Parameters logged were
secondary chamber temperatures, body container description and weight, body weight
(gross weight less container tare weight), batch cycle time, any noticeable changes or
fluctuations during each cycle, and fuel flow (consumption) rate. Additionally, presence or
lack of any ambient odors, outdoor ambient temperature and relative humidity were noted
and documented during each run.
MRI-AEDUW951-08-03 S4.wpd
-------
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 1 of 18
Section 5.
Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC)
Activities
The QA/QC requirements and emission measurement and data quality criteria for this
test project are summarized in this section. The QC procedures and acceptance criteria
specified in the EPA methods and MRI SOPs were used. The procedures included, but
were not limited to, (1) sampling equipment calibrations, (2) procedural elements of the
methods such as leak checks, proper traversing, placement of sampling probes, verification
of the integrity of metering systems prior to the start of sampling, etc., and (3) the use of
QC samples and analytical approaches such as reagent blank samples, method blanks,
matrix spike samples, duplicate analysis, and surrogate spiking. The performance and
results of all QC procedures were recorded on appropriate forms, data sheets, field logs,
and laboratory notebooks, as appropriate.
5.1 Equipment Calibration
QC procedures, acceptability limits for sampling equipment calibrations, and
calibration results are presented in Table 5-1. Calibration data sheets and equipment
condition checklists used during calibration are provided in Appendix I. Equipment used
for analysis of samples was calibrated according to the procedures in the approved standard
methods and manufacturers' manuals.
5.2 Emission Measurement and Data Quality Criteria
Specific QC procedures were followed to ensure the continuous production of useful
and valid data. Table 5-2 presents a summary of specific criteria for assessing overall
emission measurement and data quality along with the results of these determinations.
5.2.1 Blank, Spikes, and Toluene Rinse Results
The results for chloride matrix spikes and relative percent difference for duplicate
analysis are summarized in Table 5-3. The results for the metals laboratory reagent and
field blanks are summarized in Table 5-4. The metals matrix spikes, spiked laboratory
reagents, and reference material results are presented in Table 5-5. The chloride and metals
data quality objectives as specified in Table 5-2 were met.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 2 of 18
The PCDD/PCDF blank results are summarized in Table 5-6. The PCDD/PCDF Lab
Control Spike met the objective as presented in Table 5-7. The PCDD/PCDF toluene rinse
results are summarized in Table 5-8.
5.2.2 Surrogate PCDD/PCDF Recoveries
Surrogate recoveries are presented in Table 5-10. Lab surrogates were acceptable for
all train samples. Field surrogates were generally acceptable for all train samples with the
exception of 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, which showed recoveries below the 70% objective. For
the toluene rinse samples, the lab surrogates were generally acceptable. Low recoveries
were observed in Runs 6 to 9 for several compounds. Field surrogates were not spiked into
the toluene rinse samples.
5.2.3 Audit Sample Results
Results of the EPA audit samples are presented in Tables 5-11, 5-12, and 5-13 for
chloride, metals, and PCDD/PCDF, respectively.
5.3 Data Audit
The data audit was conducted to evaluate the analytical data generated during this
work assignment. The quality of the analytical data was evaluated against the quality
objectives for the measurement process, which were presented in the QAPP and the
specified test methods. The analytical data generated by MRI for this work assignment
were audited by the QAU. The MRI data met the data quality and measurement criteria for
this work assignment as noted in Tables 5-1 and 5-2.
5.4 Data Assessment
An assessment of the overall quality of the data generated for this work assignment
was conducted. The data assessment included a review of the sample collection data,
preparation and analysis data, including calibration, surrogate recoveries, laboratory control
spike sample, and precision measurements. The data generated by MRI for this report are
traceable and of known and acceptable quality.
MRI-AED\R4951-0»-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 3 of 18
Table 5-1. Calibration Procedures and QC Criteria for Sampling Eq
Parameter
1. Sampling nozzle
2. Metering
system-volume
3. Gas meter
temperature
4. Gas stream (stack)
temperature sensor
(thermocouple)
5. Final impinger outlet
temperature sensor
(thermocouple)
6. Filter temperature
sensor
(thermocouple)
7. Aneroid barometer
8. Type S pitot tube
Calibration technique
Measure 3 diameters to nearest
0.001 in. and average
measurements
Compare with calibrated critical
orifices, 40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 5, Section 7.2
Compare to mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Heated block monitored with
potentiometer thermocouple system
Compare to mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Compare to mercury-in-glass
thermometer
Compare to mercury barometer
Measure dimensions according to
40 CFR 60, Appendix A,
Method 2 for baseline coefficient of
0.84
Reference
standard
Micrometer
Calibrated critical
orifice
ASTM
thermometer
NIST traceable
potentiometer
thermocouple
system
ASTM
thermometer
ASTM
thermometer
Mercury column
barometer
Micrometer and
angle finder
Acceptance limit
Difference between high and low
measurements, <. 0.004 in.
Difference between individual
calibration factor values and
average value, & ±0.02
s ±5% of initial calibration factor
s ±5°F difference from reference
Difference of < ±1 .5% of minimum
absolute stack temperature from
absolute reference temperature
(unsaturated gas streams);
s ±1 °F difference from reference
(saturated gas streams)
<. ±2°F difference from reference
s ±5°F difference from reference
z ±0.1 in. Hg difference from
reference
Meets dimensional criteria
specified in Method 2, Section 4.1
and Figures 2-2 and 2-3.
uipment
Frequency
Prior to sampling
Prior to test series
After test series
Before and after
test series
Before and after
test series
Before and after
test series
Before and after
test series
Before and after
test series
Before and after
test series
Criteria met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes— Note 1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Note 1: XAD thermocouple #XAD-4 went bad during Run 3. It was replaced with TC #91 -11 during the run.
MRI-AEDVR4951-08-03 SS.wpii
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 4 of 18
Table 5-2. Criteria for Emission Measurement and Data Quality
Test
parameters
Dioxin/Furan
Matrix
Method 23
train samples
Method of
determination
Field surrogates
(spiked in lab during
preparation of XAD for
sampling trains)
Lab surrogates (internal
quantitation standards)
Laboratory reagent
blank
Laboratory control
sample (blank reagents
spiked with
independent standards
of native Dioxin/Furan)
Independent (second
source) check standard
(EPA or certified
Dioxin/Furan reference
standards)
Frequency
Each field sample
and blank
Each field sample
and blank
One XAD/filter
One spiked
XAD/filter
After initial
calibration
Accuracy objective
70% to 130% recovery
40% to 130% recovery
(for tetra-hexa)
25% to 130% recovery
(for hepta-octa)
Levels less than lowest
calibration standard
50% to 1 50% recovery
80% to 120% difference
Precision
objective
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Criteria met?
Yes— Note 1
Yes— Note 2
Yes— Note 3
Yes
Yes — Note 4
Note 1—As indicated in Table 5-10, sample surrogate recoveries were low for 13C 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF.
Note 2—As indicated in Table5-10, IQS toluene rinse surrogate recoveries were low for various 13C compounds for Runs 6, 8, 9,
and 10.
Note 3—Criteria met for all 2,3,7,8 isomers in both method blanks with the exception of OCDD.
Note 4—Criteria met for all 2,3,7,8 isomers except for 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF and 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF in both spike checks and OCDF in
the Batch 2 spike check.
MR]-AED\R4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Table 5-2 (Continued)
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 5 of 18
Test
parameters
Metals
Paniculate
matter
Chloride
Matrix
Method 29
train samples
Method 26A
filter & front
half rinses
Method 26A
impinger
contents
Method of
determination
Analysis of train sample
components prepared
from field reagent
blanks
QC check standard
(certified standard,
independent of working
calibration standards)
Spiked lab reagent
blanks simulating front-
half and back-half train
components
Balance calibration
check with ASTM Class
1 weights
Duplicate analysis
Spiked matrix samples
(0.1NH2SO<)
Frequency
Once to demon-
strate system
control (no gross
contamination)
and to determine
blank correction
values
After each initial
calibration
Two control spikes
for each
component (or
combined
components) at
least 1 0X the
estimated
detection limit
Prior to and after
all tare weighings
and gravimetric
determinations
Each sample
2 samples
(1 matrix)
Accuracy objective
NA
90% to 110% accuracy
(GFAAS);90%to110%
accuracy (CVAAS)
65% to 1 35% recovery
or analyzed by standard
addition
±0.2 mg of standard
weights approximating
object being weighed
NA
90% to 1 1 0% accuracy
Precision
objective
NA
NA
<40% RPD
Two
weighings,
6 hr apart
must agree
within
0.5 mg
<5% RPD,
otherwise
repeat
duplicate
analysis
NA
Criteria met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 S5.»pd
-------
Table 5-2 (Continued)
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 6 of 18
Test
parameters
Moisture
(water vapor)
Moisture
pressure
temperature
velocity
SO2, NOX,
and CO, plus
CO2 and O2,
by
instrumental
analyzer on
site
O2, CO2, and
CO by Orsat
Matrix
Impinger
contents
Gas stream
being
measured
Flue gas
Gasbag
samples
Method of
determination
Balance calibration
check with calibration
weight
Secondary technical
review of field test data
and equipment
calibration records
relative to EPA
Methods 1-5
Analyzer calibration
error check with zero,
mid-range, and high-
range calibration gases
Sampling system bias
check with zero and
either of the upscale
calibration gases
Response time
determination
Zero and calibration
drift tests
Analysis of ambient air
Triplicate analysis of
bag samples
Frequency
Prior to initial and
final gravimetric
determinations
and whenever
balance drift is
apparent
Ongoing during
testing
After system setup
each day and
more often when
needed
After the
calibration error
check, during
calibration drift
tests, and more
often when
needed
During the initial
bias check each
day; determines
when acceptable
data begins to be
recorded
Repeat the bias
check after each
run or more often
if needed
Once prior to bag
sample analysis
Each bag sample
Accuracy objective
±0.1g
Validated by meeting
posttest equipment
calibration tolerances
s±2% of span for the
difference between
system response and
calibration gas value for
any of the calibration
gases
s±5% of span for the
difference between
analyzer response for
the initial calibration
error check and system
response for the initial
bias check for either of
the calibration gases
NA
s±5% of span for the
difference between
analyzer response for
the initial calibration
error check and system
response for the final
bias check for either of
the calibration gases
±0.2 percent by volume
for ambient air oxygen
NA
Precision
objective
NA
NA, but
multiple test
runs may be
used as
indication of
overall
operation
variability
NA
NA
NA
s±3% of
span for the
difference
between
final and
initial
system
responses
for either of
the
calibration
gases
Method 3B
criteria
Method 3B
criteria
Criteria met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
MRI-AEDXR4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 7 of 18
Table 5-3. Chloride Duplicate Analysis and Matrix Spike Results
Run No.
1
2
3
5a
5
6a
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Blank
Audit 1071
Audit 1072
Result
(mg/mL)
53.9
61.0
185.1
130.1
152.4
410.8
421.5
789.8
349.7
350.1
10.0
9.4
65.2
89.8
83.4
193.4
324.0
<1.0
14.2
13.3
Duplicate
(mg/mL)
53.1
60.8
194.7
146.9
125.0
340.8
383.3
782.4
349.1
340.8
10.0
9.4
67.2
91.3
83.0
205.0
327.8
<1.0
14.1
13.3
RPD
(%)
INLET
1%
0.3%
5%
12%
20%
19%
9%
1%
0.2%
3%
OUTLET
0%
0%
3%
2%
0.5%
6%
1%
NA
1%
0%
Spike Spike Duplicate
(%) (%)
91% 94%
105% 106%
a Reanalyzed due to high relative percent difference.
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S5.wpJ
-------
Table 5-4. Metals Field and Reagent Blank Results
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 8 of 18
Description
Field Reagent Blank
Rinse and filter, pga
Rinse and filter, |jgb
Rinse and filter, |jgc
Rinse and filter, |jgd
HNO3 impingers, |jg
Fourth impinger, |jg
KMnO4 impingers, pg
HCI rinse, |jg
Method Blank, Front Half
Method Blank, Back Half
Cd
(U9)
0.360
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.067
NA
NA
NA
< 0.100
< 0.050
Pb
(U9)
0.820
1.36
0.740
0.600
0.825
NA
NA
NA
0.580
0.200
Hg
(ug)
<0.400
<0.400
<0.400
<0.400
<3.00
<0.200
<0.800
<1.00
< 0.400
<5.00
A "<" flag indicates a result less than the detection limit, corrected for any digestion, dilution and aliquot factors.
NA = Not applicable
8 Reagent blank for Runs 1-3 and 5-9 at Inlet plus Runs 1-7 at Outlet
b Reagent blank for Run 4 at Inlet (B23 = Beaker 23 containing field reagent blank samples 2049/1051)
c Reagent blank for Run 8 at Outlet (B24 = Beaker 24 containing field reagent blank samples 2049/2051)
d Reagent blank for Run 9 at Outlet (B25 = Beaker 25 containing field reagent blank sample 2049)
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 9 of 18
Table 5-5. Metals Spike and Check Standard Results
Reagent Blank Spike
Front Half
Back Half
Matrix Spike
Standard Reference Material
QC Filter
Cadmium Lead
Duplicate Duplicate
Recovery Recovery RPD Recovery Recovery RPD
125.0% 121.0% 3.3% 104.4% 107.4% 2.8%
92.0% 91.0% 1.1% 94.8% 93.4% 1.5%
-
.
_
106.0 - - 103.4
MS
101.0%
-
102.4%
103.2%
102.8%
103.6%
-
Mercury
MSD
101.0%
-
100.0%
104.2%
102.4%
100.6%
-
RPD
0.0%
-
2.4%
1.0%
0.4%
2.9%
-
RPD = Relative percent difference.
MS/MSD = Matrix spike/ matrix spike duplicate.
A"-" symbol indicates "not applicable".
MRI-AED\R4951-08-03 S5 wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 10 of 18
Table 5-6. Dioxin/Furan Blank Results (total pg)
Description
Isomer
2.3.7,8-Substituted Dioxins (DO)
2378TCDD
12378PECDD
123478HXCDD
123678HXCDD
123789HXCDD
1234678HPCDD
12346789OCDD
2,3,7,8-Substituted Furans (pa)
2378TCDF
12378PECDF
23478PECDF
123478HXCDF
123678HXCDF
234678HXCDF
123789HXCDF
1234678HPCDF
1234789HPCDF
12346789OCDF
Dioxin Homoloqs (DQ)
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
12346789OCDD
Furan Homoloas (DO)
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
12346789OCDF
Method Blank b1
U(1.66EMPC)
U( .746)
2.03
0.995
0.887
10.4
69.1
U( .483)
U( .394)
U( .416)
U( .741 EMPC)
U( .459)
U( .522)
0.651
3.21
U( .681 EMPC)
U( 5.69 EMPC)
1.3
U( .746)
5.22
18.4
69.1
U( .483)
U( .405)
1.36
8.25
U( 5.69 EMPC)
Method Blank b2
U( 1.44 EMPC)
U( .866)
U( .907)
U( .905)
U( .859)
7.28
71.3
3.31
U( .645 EMPC)
U( .466)
U( .587)
U( .562)
U( .64)
U( .727)
U( 1.55 EMPC)
U( .757)
1.79
20.9
1.08
U( .89)
13.9
71.3
6.0
U( .454)
U(.621)
U( .664)
1.79
EMPC - Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 S5.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 11 of 18
Table 5-7. Dioxin/Furan Lab Control Spike and Independent Check Standard Results
Spike Level
(Total pg)
2,3,7,8-Substituted Dioxins
2378TCDD 200
12378PECDD 1000
123478HXCDD 1000
123678HXCDD 1000
123789HXCDD 1000
1234678HPCDD 1000
12346789OCDD 2000
2.3.7.8-Substituted Furans
2378TCDF 200
12378PECDF 1000
23478PECDF 1000
123478HXCDF 1000
123678HXCDF 1000
234678HXCDF 1000
123789HXCDF 1000
1234678HPCDF 1000
1234789HPCDF 1000
12346789OCDF 2000
LCS b1 % Recovery
179 89.5
903 90.3
896 89.6
909 90.9
885 88.5
958 95.8
2100 105
176 88.0
720 72.0
787 78.7
860 86.0
911 91.1
896 89.6
869 86.9
1050 105
885 88.5
1600 80.0
LCS b2 % Recovery
166 83.0
828 82.8
847 84.7
861 86.1
845 84.5
888 88.8
1740 87.0
171 85.5
648 64.8
769 76.9
874 87.4
885 88.5
895 89.5
945 94.5
953 95.3
801 80.1
1430 71.5
Spike
Check b1 % Recovery
191 95.5
953 95.3
965 96.5
998 99.8
975 97.5
959 95.9
1900 95.0
189 94.5
740 74.0
785 78.5
940 94.0
957 95.7
951 95.1
1090 109.0
1050 105.0
949 94.9
1730 86.5
Spike
Check b2 % Recovery
172 86.0
873 87.3
890 89.0
912 91.2
892 89.2
895 89.5
1750 87.5
178 89.0
674 67.4
770 77.0
891 89.1
912 91.2
911 91.1
912 91.2
983 98.3
885 88.5
1470 73.5
MRI-AED\R495I-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 12 of 18
Table 5-8. Toluene Rinse Dioxin/Furan Results—Inlet
Field ID
Description
Extract ID
MS File
Isomer
1012
Run 1a
42838 (b1)
G09V34.RPT
1023
Run 1 b
42839 (b1)
G09V35.RPT
CONDITION
2012
Run 2
42841 (t>1)
G09V37.RPT
1
3012
Run 3
42843 (b1)
G09V39.RPT
10012
Run 10
42926 (b2)
G14V11.RPT
4012
Run 4
42845 (b1)
G09V314.RPT
CONDITION 2
4012
RunS
42847 (b1)
G09V316.RPT
6012
Run 6
4291 8 (b2)
G13V59.RPT
7012
Run 7
42920 (b2)
G13V511.RPT
CONDITION 3
8012
RunS
42922 (b2)
G13V513.RPT
9012
Run 9
42924 (b2)
G13V515.RPT
2.3.7.8-Substituted Dioxins (DO)
2378TCDD
12378PECDD
123478HXCDD
123678HXCDD
123789HXCDD
1234678HPCDD
12346789OCDD
U( .503)
U(1.21 EMPC)
U( .808 EMPC)
U( 1.47 EMPC)
U( 1.23 EMPC)
18.8
102
U( .496)
U( .498)
U( .421)
U( .335)
U( .318)
3.13
27.3
U( .702 EMPC)
U( 3.7 EMPC)
5.16
8.35
6.9
43.6
72.4
U( .45)
U( .724 EMPC)
U( .815 EMPC)
1.47
U( .728)
U(1.39)J
5.69 J
J( 8.63 EMPC) J
U( 1.51 EMPC) J( 14.1 EMPC) J
13.1
36.7
101
391
U( .407)
U( .507)
U( 5.23 EMPC) U( .513 EMPC)
4.91
8.24
6.65
46.2
82.4
0.558
0.651
0.809
3.65
5.42
U( 6.54 EMPC)
U( .935 EMPC) U( 11.9 EMPC)
5.42
15.9
34.8
86.3
U(.431)
1.56
U( 1.87 EMPC)
3
U( 3.97 EMPC)
U( 15.1 EMPC)
76.7
U( .384)
1.9
3.46
U( 5.89 EMPC)
8.56
84.5
350
U( 1.13)J
U( 1.4)J
2.24 (J)
U( 2.91 EMPC) J
3.63 J
23.5
61.6
2.3.7.8-Substituted Furans (M)
2378TCDF
12378PECDF
23478PECDF
123478HXCDF
123678HXCDF
234678HXCDF
123789HXCDF
1234678HPCDF
1234789HPCDF
12346789OCDF
U( 2.46 EMPC)
U( 1.63 EMPC)
U( 2.73 EMPC)
U( 3 EMPC)
3.2
3.57
U( 1.62 EMPC)
11.1
1.81
10
U( .62 EMPC)
0.37
U( .771 EMPC)
U( .585 EMPC)
U( .571 EMPC)
U( .808 EMPC)
U( .28)
2.33
U( .479 EMPC)
1.87
U( 6.06 EMPC)
4.82
14.2
22.5
19.8
40.9
20.2
97.6
21
60.6
0.842
U( .593 EMPC)
1.6
1.98
2.1
U( 3.47 EMPC)
1.45
U( 8.94 EMPC)
2.45
8.13
1.19
2.14
5.76
U(18.9EMPC)J
14.4(J)
232(J)
56.7(J)
195(J)
11.9(J)
34.6
6.93
4.61
14.2
22.6
19.8
36.2
19.4
87.7
20.9
58.4
1.07
U( .928 EMPC)
1.39
4.07
5.51
9.63
U( 1.67 EMPQIK 14.8 EMPC)J
U( 1.87 EMPC)
U( 2.32 EMPC)
0.954
4.44
0.985
1.9
14.7(J)
71.9(J)
35.4(J)
48.6(J)
12.3(J)
19.8
2.07
2.71
5.6
7.67
U( 8.31 EMPC)
29.1
U( 8.48 EMPC)
38.7
5.62
15.6
U( .997 EMPC)
1.28
4.14
U(13.4EMPC)J
13(J)
U(136EMPC)J
U(31.6EMPC)J
106(J)
7.27(J)
20.9
U( 1.76 EMPC) J
U( 2.65 EMPC)
U( 5.64 EMPC)
5.2(J)
U(6.16EMPC)J
42.7(J)
U( 9.38 EMPC)J
U( 27.4 EMPC)J
3.47(J)
7.27
Dioxin Homologs (DO)
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
123467890CDD
2.41
2.98
11.4
38.1
U( .496)
U( .498)
0.889
5.33
25.5
35.2
91.6
79.8
0.996
U( .472)
17.3
29.4
1.08
13.8
89.8
200
21.4
37.1
78.1
81.4
U( .507)
U( .482)
6.67
9.98
5.59
23.7
49.9
62.3
0.736
4.17
29.7
28.7
1.47
13.5
67.5
146
U( 1.13)
U(1.4)
5.96
44.1
Furan Homoloas (oa)
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
12346789OCDF
34.6
12.5
22.4
20.5
10
7.05
2.24
2.46
2.38
1.87
93.1
83.5
217
164
60.6
5.17
3.19
16.4
2.22
8.13
8.12
26.8
367
308
34.6
95.8
90.2
193
154
58.4
6.84
2.9
8.22
5.45
1.9
39.9
42.3
179
123
19.8
32.8
27
83.5
78.3
15.6
8.21
18.5
59.6
180
20.9
16.4
15.1
52.3
11
7.27
J-Value calculated from a 13C IQS with recovery outside.
EMPC-Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration
MRI-AEDVR4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 13 of 18
Table 5-9. Toluene Rinse Dioxin/Furan Results—Outlet
Field ID
Description
Extract ID
MS File
Isomer
1036
Run 1
42840 (b1)
G09V36.RPT
CONDITION
2036
Run 2
42842 (b1)
G09V38.RPT
1
3036
Run 3
42844 (b1)
G09V310.RPT
CONDITION 2
4036
Run 4
42846 (b1)
G09V315.RPT
6036
Run 6
4291 9 (b2)
G13V510.RPT
7036
Run 7
42921 (b2)
G13V512.RPT
CONDITION 3
8036
Run 8
42923 (b2)
G13V514.RPT
9036
Run 9
42925 (b2)
G13V516.RPT
2.3.7.8-Substituted Dioxins (pg)
2378TCDD
12378PECDD
123478HXCDD
123678HXCDD
123789HXCDD
1234678HPCDD
12346789OCDD
U( .384)
1.71
U( 2.54 EMPC
U(4.21 EMPC
4.51'
39.6
72.5
U( .646 EMPC
U( 2.88 EMPC
3.84
4.6
U( 5.43 EMPC
18.3
68.3
U( .347)
U( .353)
U( .286)
U( .583 EMPC)
U( .74 EMPC)
3.73
14.3
U(.461)
U(1.91 EMPC)
U( 2.69 EMPC)
U( 3.14 EMPC)
3.62
12.3
62
U(.411)
U( .47)
U( .509)
0.727
U( .483)
4.02
18.2
U( .339)
U( .793 EMPC
U( .826 EMPC
1.68
1.62
11.7
41
U( .508)
U( 1.26 EMPC)
U( 1.79 EMPC)
U(3.11 EMPC)
U( 6.69 EMPC)
13
43.7
U( .378)
U( .605)
U(.713)
U(.712)
U( .676)
U( 3.2 EMPC)
16.7
2.3.7.8-Substituted Furans (pg)
2378TCDF
12378PECDF
23478PECDF
123478HXCDF
123678HXCDF
234678HXCDF
123789HXCDF
1234678HPCDF
1234789HPCDF
123467890CDF
Dioxin Homologs (DO)
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
12346789OCDD
Furan Homoloqs (pgl
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
12346789OCDF
U( .952 EMPC
1.57
3.67
7.46
7.16
17.0
9.09
60.4
16.4
57.7
U( .384)
3.32
24.1
73.0
12.8
22
71.5
109
57.7
U( 6.02 EMPC
2.05
3.38
4.88
4.02
5.73
6.29
10.8
9.74
28.7
2.77
9.44
24.5
28.1
16.2
9.85
26.6
20.7
28.7
U( .294)
U(.166)
U( .256)
0.296
U( .331 EMPC)
U( .495 EMPC)
U( .235)
U( 2.13 EMPC)
U(.261)
1.69
U( .347)
1.06
2.31
6.67
0.776
0.505
1.46
U( .247)
1.69
1.89
1.08
U(.213)
2.59
U( 2.2 EMPC)
U( 3.5 EMPC)
3.06
6.34
U( 5.45 EMPC)
17.5
3.24
8.33
16
17.8
6.63
5.48
5.69
8.12
17.5
U( .293)
U( .276 EMPC)
U( .458 EMPC)
U( .572)
U( .547)
U( 1.36 EMPC)
U( .708)
1.93
U( .389)
0.75
U(.411)
U( .47)
0.715
6.59
U( .293)
0.698
U( .605)
1.97
0.75
U( .499 EMPC
0.584
1.12
U( 1.85 EMPC
U( 1.87 EMPC
U( 5.81 EMPC
U(1.91 EMPC
8.33
1.53
4.88
U( .339)
0.559
4.57
22.6
U( .322)
6.23
4.23
11.1
4.88
U( .552 EMPC)
U( .572 EMPC)
U( 1.49 EMPC)
U(2.41)J
U(2.3)J
19.2(J)
U( 15EMPC)J
8.52(J)
U(1.82EMPC)J
2.22
U( .508)
2.27
10.9
22.8
3.46
0.814
18.6
16.8
2.22
U( .363)
U( .223)
U( .235)
U(1.15)J
U(1.1)J
U( 1.78 EMPC) J
U(1.42)J
U( 2.75 EMPC)
U( .466)
U( .551 EMPC)
U( .378)
U( .605)
U(.7)
U( .47)
U( .363)
0.392
U(1.21)
U(1.44)
U( .551 EMPC)
MRI-AED\R495I-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Table 5-10. Dioxin/Furan Surrogate Recoveries (%)
MR!-AED\R495I-08-03 SS.wpd
J- Recovery outside the method criteria
Field surrogates 70%-130%
IQS 40%-130% tetra-hexa, 25%-130% hepta-octa
NA- Not applicable
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 14 of 18
Description
Lab Surrogates (IQS)
13C2378TCDF
13C2378TCDD
13C12378PeCDF
13C12378PeCDD
13C123678HxCDF
13C123678HxCDD
13C1234678HpCDF
13C1234678HpCDD
13C120CDD
Field Surrogates
37CL2378TCDD
13C23478P6CDF
13C123478HxCDF
13C123478HxCDD
13C1234789HpCDF
Description
Lab Surrogates (IQS)
13C2378TCDF
13C2378TCDD
13C12378PeCDF
13C12378PeCDD
13C123678HxCDF
13C123678HxCDD
13C1234678HpCDF
13C1234678HpCDD
13C120CDD
Field Surrogates
37CL2378TCDD
13C23478PeCDF
13C123478HxCDF
13C123478HxCDD
13C1234789HpCDF
Method
Blank b1
88.4
88.6
123
93.3
112
113
123
120
121
97.6
66.8(J)
93.9
88.8
89.0
Method
Blank b1
88.4
88.6
123
93.3
112
113
123
120
121
97.6
66.8(J)
93.9
88.8
89.0
Method
Blank b2
78.4
85.4
98.1
81.6
99.5
107
99.5
102
110
93.8
65.6(J)
98.0
91.6
94.3
Method
Blank b2
78.4
85.4
98.1
81.6
99.5
107
99.5
102
110
93.8
65.6(J)
98.0
91.6
94.3
INLET TRAINS
Run 1
86.8
87.6
124
101
91.6
103
97.5
111
114
97.4
67.8(J)
96.7
90.5
95.0
Run 2
88.1
93.4
124
103
102
113
116
123
128
97.2
72.2
96.6
89.2
96.3
Run 3
82.9
87.0
118
97.6
88.9
103
99.8
111
113
96.1
68.0 (J)
96.4
92.4
90.6
Run 4
76.6
90.4
101
85.2
106
114
108
115
120
91.8
65.7(J)
96.0
89.9
94.4
Run 5
75.4
87.3
97.5
89.2
94.5
107
95.9
109
107
90.7
72.4
92.4
88.6
93.6
Run6
78.8
90.9
101
95.3
102
108
105
110
112
91.7
75.0
94.4
90.5
91.5
Run 7
73.8
82
99.1
82.1
86.9
98.8
82.2
99.6
106
93.8
66.3(J)
92.0
92.1
105
Run8
75.6
82.2
101
92.3
91.9
102
93.2
101
90.8
95.3
76.4
93.8
89.0
96.3
Run 9
83.1
91.9
107
92.6
78.7
110
71.6
103
93.9
92.2
71.5
88.9
86.0
124
Run 10
77.4
90.1
103
88.9
99.7
110
99.6
113
119
90.3
69.9 (J)
91.7
88.0
103
OUTLET TRAINS
Run 1
85.2
88.5
115
98.1
99.9
109
108
116
117
97.4
71.9
99.4
90.8
95.7
Run 2
89.9
92.1
121
100
94.6
108
112
119
123
95.4
68.9(J)
98.8
88.0
93.5
Run 3
84.1
86.5
115
94.2
91.1
103
97.8
111
115
95.1
66.6(J)
97.2
87.4
95.4
Run 4
78.9
91.8
103
93.6
102
111
105
110
114
91.3
68.2(J)
95.8
90.7
95.9
Run6
77.0
87.4
95.9
86.8
96.3
107
103
113
114
94.3
76.6
96.3
93.4
96.2
Run 7
77.8
88.4
104
97.2
101
110
102
108
102
92.6
71.4
97.2
91.3
90.7
RunS
75.8
85.7
99.9
97.9
84.9
103
76.7
96.7
79.1
89.9
70.1
91.6
86.2
111
Run 9
73.5
83.1
99.3
89.7
84.9
105
83.4
98.4
89.9
94.4
69.1(J)
96.8
85.3
110
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 15 of 18
Table 5-10 (Continued)
INLET TOLUENE RINSES
Description
Lab Surrogates (IQS)
13C2378TCDF
13C2378TCDD
13C12378PeCDF
13C12378PeCDD
13C123678HxCDF
13C123678HXCDD
13C1234678HpCDF
13C1234678HpCDD
13C120CDD
Field Surrogates
37CL2378TCDD
13C23478PeCDF
13C123478HxCDF
13C123478HxCDD
13C1234789HpCDF
Run 1
89.5
90.2
127
98.1
105
113
125
125
125
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 1
72.3
72.4
110
92.1
91.8
103
116
118
122
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 2
76.5
75.3
109
91.9
88.4
98.6
106
111
114
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 3
83.9
82.6
114
92.9
93
105
112
120
126
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 4
84.3
84.2
128
109
91.5
107
103
111
118
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 5
69.2
67.8
94.1
76.1
78.7
90.0
102
110
112
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
OUTLET TOLUENE
Description
Lab Surrogates (IQS)
13C2378TCDF
13C2378TCDD
13C12378PeCDF
13C12378PeCDD
13C123678HxCDF
13C123678HxCDD
13C1234678HpCDF
13C1234678HpCDD
13C120CDD
Field Surrogates
37CL2378TCDD
13C23478PeCDF
13C123478HxCDF
13C123478HxCDD
13C1234789HpCDF
Run 1
81.3
81
115
94.5
89
97.4
109
110
115
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 2
85.9
82.4
113
91.8
93.5
105
112
114
117
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run3
81.7
81.2
112
90.4
93.2
103
104
116
121
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 4
75.6
79.1
105
92.1
87.4
100
105
113
115
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 6
78.2
76.4
94.1
52.1
23.7(J)
52.4
24.3(J)
84.1
103
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
RINSES
Run 6
65.4
75.1
92.3
82.8
47.6
89.1
48.5
92.7
92.4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 7
84.1
93.5
107
86.7
42.4
87.9
42.8
106
114
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 7
83.6
91.9
107
88.9
55.7
103
55.7
111
113
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run8
85.9
80.5
94.9
50.5
10.7(J)
45.3
9.53(J)
77.5
97.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run8
89.1
88.8
104
52.5
12.3(J)
46.8
11.1(J)
87.3
107
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 9
37.1 (J)
39.1 (J)
48.2
33.5 (J)
11.8(J)
35.9 (J)
13.3(J)
49.5
53.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 9
92.7
99.4
117
76.9
26.8 (J)
71.6
28.0
101
117
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Run 10
75.3
51.6
66.0
28.1 (J)
ND(J)
25.6 (J)
6.81 (J)
48.1
68.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LCSbl
92.8
94.2
136 (J)
109
117
117
130
128
127
97.1
73.2
91.6
88.4
88.7
Audit
Sample
74.8
86.0
93.3
87.1
90.3
106
89.3
96.8
100
95.0
74.5
94.9
91.9
104
LCSb2
77.4
84.5
96.8
86.3
84.7
93.7
86.9
90.3
94.2
95.7
73.9
98.1
90.7
90.6
MRI-AED\R495l-08-03 SS.wpJ
J- Recovery outside the method criteria
Field surrogates 70%-130%
IQS 40%-130% tetra-hexa, 25%-130% hepta-octa
NA- Not applicable
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30, 1999
Page 16 of 18
Table 5-11. Chloride Analysis Results for EPA Audit Samples
Audit Sample ID
J2017-1071
J2572-1072
Chloride (ug/mL)
64.9
69.3
Pass/Fail
Pass
Pass
MR1-AED\R4951-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 17 of 18
Table 5-12. Metals Analysis Results for EPA Audit Samples
Audit sample ID Sample description
Cd Pb
cone. cone.
M29-019/Blank Blank filter (ug) <0.10 0.280
M29-019/FL-112 Spiked filter (Multi-metals low level, ug) 11.2 51.0
M29-01 9/MMA-1 24" Spiked solution (Multi-metals extra low level, ug/mL) 0.00980 0.0494
M29-01 9/Hg-1 17" Spike solution (Mercury low level, ng/mL)
Note: All sample results greater than the detection limit have been rounded to three significant figures.
A "<" flag indicates a result less than the detection limit, corrected for any digestion and dilution factors.
a This sample represents a 1,000-fold dilution of the original solution.
b This sample represents a 10,000-fold dilution of the original solution.
Hg
(ng/mL) Pass/Fail
- Pass
- Pass
- Pass
< 0.20 Pass
MRI-AED\R49SI-08-03 SS.wpd
-------
Emission Test Report
EMC WA-2-08
Section 5
Revision: 0
Date: September 30,1999
Page 18 of 18
Table 5-13. Dioxin/Furan Audit Sample Results (total pg)
Description
Isomer
2,3.7,8-Substituted Dioxins (DQ)
2378TCDD
12378PECDD
123478HXCDD
123678HXCDD
123789HXCDD
1234678HPCDD
12346789OCDD
2,3,7,8-Substituted Furans (pq)
2378TCDF
12378PECDF
23478PECDF
123478HXCDF
123678HXCDF
234678HXCDF
123789HXCDF
1234678HPCDF
1234789HPCDF
12346789OCDF
Dioxin Homoloas (oa)
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
12346789OCDD
Furan Homoloas toa)
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
12346789OCDF
Performance
Audit
Sample
M23-028 (XAD)
185
179
169
175
169
355
390
168
127
158
175
179
180
437
380
393
282
452
599
876
562
360
448
1020
755
282
Pass/Fail
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
pass
MR1-AEEAR4951-08-03 SS.wpd
------- |