United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
National Risk Management
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Research and Development
EPA/600/SR-00/100    December 2000
Long-Term                                of  EPA-
                                    2
                               and


Lawrence H. Fisher, James E. Houck, Paul E. Tiegs, and James McGaughey
  Wood stoves have been identified as
a major source of particulate and poly-
cyclic organic matter (POM) emissions.
For this  reason, new source  perfor-
mance standards (NSPS) were promul-
gated for wood heaters. Wood heaters
sold after July 1, 1992, had to be certi-
fied for low emissions, meet the most
stringent requirements of NSPS, and
are referred to as phase 2 certified. Of
concern has been the fact that labora-
tory and field studies have shown that
certified wood heaters can physically
degrade with use and their air emis-
sions commensurately increase. The
objective of this study was to evaluate
the condition and air emissions from
old phase 2 certified  wood heaters  in-
stalled in homes and used regularly for
home heating since the 1992/1993 heat-
ing season or earlier. Sixteen stoves
were evaluated in the study, eight each
in Klamath Falls and Portland,  Oregon.
An extensive data base from 43 week-
long test runs was developed. The par-
ticulate emission factors of the certified
phase 2 stoves evaluated  in this study
appear to have increased with  use but,
on  average,  after about 7  years still
have lower emissions than uncertified
conventional stoves. In addition, it was
clear  from the  results that emission
rates for phase 2 stove models reported
as part of the NSPS  certification pro-
cess do not represent emission levels
of the same  stove models in  homes
after extended use.
  This Project Summary was developed
by the National Risk  Management Re-
search Laboratory's Air Pollution Pre-
vention and Control Division, Research
Triangle Park, NC, to announce key find-
ings of the research project that is fully
documented in a separate report of the
same title (see Project Report ordering
information at back).

Introduction
  Residential  wood combustion (RWC)
has been identified as a major source of
particulate matter (PM) and POM air emis-
sions.  During 1997, RWC contributed an
estimated 12% of the sum of the total PM
with aerodynamic diameters < 10 urn (PM10)
emissions  attributed to all  fuel combus-
tion,  industrial processes, and transporta-
tion  sources combined.  RWC was also
identified  as the largest single source of
POM during 1990. Approximately 72% of
the cordwood burned annually in the U.S.
in the category of residential wood com-
bustion was burned  in  wood stoves. (The
remaining 28% was  burned mostly in fire-
places.) An estimated 9.3 million  wood
stoves were used in  homes during the
1997-1998 heating  season.
  Due to the level of emissions attributed
to wood stoves, standards of performance
were  promulgated  for new residential
wood heaters. All wood heaters sold after
July 1, 1992, have to meet the most strin-
gent phase 2 particulate emission  limits
of the standards. These particulate  emis-
sion limits are 4.1  g/hr for catalytic stoves
and 7.5 g/hr for noncatalytic stoves. The
limits  for  catalytic stoves are lower than
for  noncatalytic stoves  since the pre-
sumed deterioration of the catalyst over
time was  estimated to  result in emissions
from catalytic wood heaters over their use-

-------
ful lifetimes, approximately equal to those
for noncatalytic wood heaters.
  Furthermore, there has been concern
about the overall physical deterioration of
wood stoves with use and the commen-
surate increase in air emissions. This con-
cern  has  been  confirmed  in  both
laboratory and in-home studies: physical
degradation coupled with higher PM emis-
sions has been documented  for some
stoves. Not only  are accurate airshed in-
ventories of PM and POM fundamentally
important for health  and environmental
assessments, state and local agencies in
areas of PM10 nonattainment  have  been
directed to consider performance degra-
dation in their State Implementation Plans
(SIPs) when calculating credits from re-
placing noncertified stoves with certified
stoves. The  replacement of  noncertified
stoves with phase  2  certified stoves re-
mains a viable option for reducing airshed
pollutant  levels and obtaining  PM10  SIP
credits because,  as of 1997,  more than
80% of the wood stoves in use were still
older non-certified units. In addition, be-
cause over 90% of the PM10 emissions
from residential wood combustion are also
PM with aerodynamic diameters < 2.5 jim
(PM25), emission credits may be very im-
portant  for  possible  future  PM25
nonattainment  areas.

Experimental Procedures
  The basis  of  the  experimental study
was the use of the Automated Woodstove
Emission Sampler (AWES),  which was
developed to quantify emissions of  par-
ticles for residential wood-burning appli-
ances while  they are in normal in-home
use.  The AWES is small  and  operates
unattended in home settings.  Due to the
temporal variability in emissions  from
wood-burning appliances, the  AWES is
also  designed to collect long-term inte-
grated samples necessary  to provide
mean values. Studies conducted with the
AWES have provided the majority of the
data base used  for particulate  emission
factor development by EPA for residential
wood combustion. The  AWES has  been
used  to  quantify emissions  from wood
stoves,  masonry heaters,  pellet stoves,
and fireplaces. Due to its extensive use,
the AWES has undergone EPA-supported
quality assurance evaluation.
  For sampling purposes,  the AWES is
placed adjacent to  the wood-burning ap-
pliance in study  homes. For wood-stove
applications,  a stainless steel  inlet probe
is typically attached to the chimney (stove
pipe)  30  cm above the flue collar of the
stove. The sample  is withdrawn at a rate
of approximately  1 L/min. The  flow rate is
maintained  by a calibrated orifice.  Par-
ticulate  samples,  including condensible
particles, are captured with a heated filter
followed by an XAD-2® resin cartridge. All
interconnecting tubing, holders, and hard-
ware exposed to the sample are made of
either stainless steel  or Teflon® to main-
tain sample integrity. After sample collec-
tion,  the chimney  gas is passed through
silica gel to protect downstream compo-
nents from  condensate. The oxygen con-
tent of the chimney gas is measured with
an electrochemical cell. The sample flow
is then returned to the wood-burning ap-
pliance chimney above the point where
the  sample was withdrawn. Room  tem-
perature  and chimney  gas temperature
are measured with Type K thermocouples.
The  chimney  gas temperature  is mea-
sured within  the  chimney at  the same
location  as  the sample  is withdrawn.
  The data logging system is a key com-
ponent of the AWES. The  data  logging
system records date, time,  oxygen  con-
tent,  room temperature, and chimney gas
temperature at regular intervals. The oxy-
gen  content of the chimney gas, along
with the mass of wood burned, allows for
the calculation of  total chimney gas flow
during sampling which is  needed for the
subsequent calculation of emission rates
and emission  factors.  The record of chim-
ney gas temperatures allows for the total
time  of appliance operation  over  the
course  of the sampling duration to  be
determined. In addition to data recording,
the system  is programmed to control the
sampling frequency,  sampling  duration,
and sampling period.  For this study, the
AWES was programmed to  sample for 2
minutes every  15 minutes  for  1 week.
The system is further  programmed to turn
on the sampling  pump  during the pro-
grammed 2-minute sampling time only if
the wood stove is in operation (as deter-
mined  by the chimney temperature), in
order to avoid  collection of sample mate-
rial when the appliance  is not  in opera-
tion.  A threshold chimney temperature of
100° F (38° C) was used as an  indicator
of wood stove operation.

Results and Discussion
  The primary objective of the study was to
select phase 2 stoves that were installed
in homes prior to the  fall of 1992 in order
to assess the level of long-term degrada-
tion  and  potential increase in  PM  and
POM air emissions of older phase 2 certi-
fied stoves  under  actual in-home usage.
Wood stoves in homes in both  Portland
and Klamath Falls, Oregon, were selected
for this study. The average heating de-
gree  day (HDD) value for Portland is 4109
and the average HDD for Klamath  Falls
is 6600.  Stoves in the  two climatologi-
cally dissimilar cities were selected to pro-
duce  results  more widely applicable to
wood-stove  usage in the  nation  as  a
whole than if homes in a single city were
selected. In addition, nine phase 2 stoves
installed in homes in  Klamath Falls were
previously studied during the 1989-1990
and  1991-1992  heating seasons. There-
fore, a secondary objective of the study
was to utilize as many of these homes as
possible in the current study to help docu-
ment phase 2 stove degradation and com-
mensurate emission increase.
  Sixteen  homes were targeted for study
during the 1998-1999  heating season.
Two of the study group were  homes in
Klamath  Falls that had phase 2 wood
stoves that were part of the  earlier stud-
ies. Emission samples were collected for
three 1-week periods from wood stoves
in each home using the AWES. The AWES
was  developed  specifically  for the  in-
home collection of  air emission samples
from residential wood  burning appliances,
and  data  developed  from its  use  have
previously been  used to calculate par-
ticulate emission  factors published in AP-
42. Samples collected with  the  AWES
were  analyzed for particulate matter and
organic compounds. The specific organic
compounds analyzed  included the seven
and sixteen POM compounds needed to
calculate the 7-Polycyclic  Aromatic Hy-
drocarbon (PAH) and  16-PAH values, re-
spectively, which are used as surrogate
indicators  for POM. The PM and  POM
surrogate emission  factors (mass of pol-
lutant emissions  per  unit mass of fuel)
were compared against the emission fac-
tors tabulated in  AP-42 for wood  stoves.
The PM emission rates (mass of pollutant
emissions per time of stove operation)
measured under actual in-home use for
each  wood-stove model were compared
against their certified  emission  values
listed by EPA.
  The PM emissions  from this  study and
from the previous studies were compared
for the stoves in the Klamath  Falls homes
that  were  part of  earlier  studies.
Cordwood tree species, cordwood mois-
ture,  the  amount of cordwood burned,
burn  rates, ambient  temperature during
testing, a description  of wood stove use
in  each home,  chimney  characteristics,
and the condition of the stoves were also
documented  as part of the study.

Conclusions
  Of the 16 stoves  inspected, all showed
the effects of use. However, only six stoves
were  degraded  to the  point that it was
speculated that their  condition would
significantly  affect air emissions.  Rou-
tine maintenance or minor repairs could

-------
have kept all units in good operating con-
dition if the  maintenance or repairs  had
been  done.
  An extensive data base was developed
from the 43 week-long test runs  on 16
homes in Klamath Falls and Portland. No
direct statistical correlation between emis-
sions and wood moisture,  burn rate, or
stove condition could be made due to the
number of variables associated with real-
world in-home use of wood  stoves.
  The particulate emissions for stoves in
Portland homes were, on average,  higher
than for stoves  in Klamath  Falls homes.
This result is consistent with the average
higher fuel moisture content  and burn rate
characteristics of the Portland portion of
the study as compared with the Klamath
Falls portion of the study.
  The particulate emission factors  for the
certified phase 2 stoves evaluated  in this
study appear to  have become higher with
use,  but after about 7 years, on average,
the certified  phase 2 stoves still  have
lower emissions than uncertified conven-
tional stoves (Table 1).
  The emission rates for phase 2 stove
models reported as part of the NSPS cer-
tification process do not represent emis-
sion  levels of the same  stove models in
homes after extended use.
  Particulate  emissions  cannot be  used
as a  surrogate measure of  POM emis-
sions for wood stoves. POM emission fac-
tors,  as based on the 7-PAH and 16-PAH
surrogates, determined from the in-home
use of wood stoves in this study,  were
lower than the POM emission factors tabu-
lated  in AP-42. This observation is signifi-
cant  because the AP-42  emission factors
are the basis for the national emission
inventory  of  POM for which  residential
wood combustion was  identified  as  the
single largest source.
Table 1. Comparison of average
particulate emission factors (5H
adjusted) to AP-42 values.
Stove Group
Catalytic Stoves
(5 Stoves, 1 3
Runs)
Noncatalytic
Stoves (1 1
Stoves, 30 Runs)
Catalytic
Noncatalytic
Conventional
Method 5H
Equivalent
Emission Factor
g/kg (Dry)
10.8
9.23
8.1
7.3
15.3
 L.  Fisher, J.  Houck, and  P.  Tiegs, are with OMNI Environmental Services,  Inc,
   Beaverton,  OR 97005,  and J. McGaughey is with  Eastern  Research  Group,
   Morrisville, NC 27560.
 Robert C. McCrillis, the EPA Project Officer, is no longer with the Agency, but for details
   contact John Kinsey (see below).
 The  complete  report,  entitled "Long-Term  Performance of EPA-Certified Phase 2
   Woodstoves, Klamath Falls and Portland, Oregon: 1998/1999," (Order No. PB2001-
   101921; Cost: $54.00, subject to change)  will be available only from:
         National Technical Information Service
         5285 Port Royal Road
         Springfield,  VA 22161
         Telephone:  (703)  605-6000
                    (800) 553-6847 (U.S. only)
 The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
         Air Pollution Prevention  and Control Division
         National Risk Management Research Laboratory
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Research Triangle Park,  NC 27711

-------
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
CenterforEnvironmental Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
EPA/600/SR-00/100
PRESORTED STANDARD
 POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35

-------