United States       Prevention, Pesticides      EPA712-C-96-192
           Environmental Protection    and Toxic Substances      June 1996
           Agency         (7101)
&EPA    Health Effects Test
           Guidelines
           OPPTS 870.1200
           Acute Dermal Toxicity
                 "Public Draft'

-------
                           INTRODUCTION
     This guideline is one of a series of test guidelines that have been
developed by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
United States Environmental Protection Agency for use in the testing of
pesticides and toxic substances, and the development of test data that must
be submitted to the Agency for review under Federal regulations.

     The Office of Prevention,  Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS)
has  developed this guideline through  a  process of harmonization that
blended the testing  guidance and requirements that existed in the Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics  (OPPT) and appeared in Title 40,
Chapter I,  Subchapter R of the Code of Federal Regulations  (CFR), the
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) which appeared in publications of the
National Technical  Information Service (NTIS) and the guidelines pub-
lished by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD).

     The purpose of harmonizing these guidelines into a single set of
OPPTS  guidelines is to minimize variations among the testing procedures
that must be performed to meet the data requirements of the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency under the Toxic  Substances Control Act (15
U.S.C. 2601) and the Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide and Rodenticide Act
(7U.S.C. I36,etseq.).

     Public Draft Access Information: This draft guideline is part of a
series of related harmonized guidelines that  need to  be considered as a
unit. For copies: These guidelines are available electronically from the
EPA Public Access  Gopher (gopher.epa.gov) under the heading "Environ-
mental Test Methods and Guidelines" or in paper by contacting the OPP
Public    Docket    at    (703)    305-5805    or     by    e-mail:
guidelines@epamail.epa.gov.

     To Submit Comments: Interested persons are invited to submit com-
ments. By mail: Public Docket and Freedom of Information Section, Office
of Pesticide Programs, Field Operations Division (7506C), Environmental
Protection Agency,  401  M  St.  SW.,  Washington, DC 20460. In  person:
bring to: Rm. 1132, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Ar-
lington, VA. Comments may also be submitted  electronically by  sending
electronic mail (e-mail) to: guidelines@epamail.epa.gov.

     Final  Guideline Release: This guideline is available  from the U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 on The Federal Bul-
letin  Board.   By  modem   dial   202-512-1387,   telnet   and  ftp:
fedbbs.access.gpo.gov (IP 162.140.64.19),  or  call 202-512-0132 for disks
or paper copies.  This  guideline is also available electronically in ASCII
and PDF (portable document format) from the EPA Public Access  Gopher
(gopher.epa.gov) under the heading  "Environmental Test Methods and
Guidelines."

-------
OPPTS 870.1200  Acute dermal toxicity.
     (a) Scope—(1) Applicability. This guideline is intended to meet test-
ing  requirements  of  both  the  Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136, et seq.) and the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) (15 U.S.C. 2601).

     (2) Background.  The source material  used in developing this har-
monized OPPTS test guideline are 40 CFR 798.1100 Acute Dermal Tox-
icity; OPP 81-2 Acute  Dermal Toxicity (Pesticide Assessment Guidelines,
Subdivision F—Hazard Evaluation; Human  and  Domestic Animals) EPA
report 540/09-82-025,  1982; and OECD 402 Acute  Dermal Toxicity.

     (b) Purpose. In the assessment and evaluation of the toxic character-
istics of a substance, determination of acute dermal toxicity is useful where
exposure by the dermal route is likely. It provides  information on health
hazards likely to arise from short-term exposure by the  dermal route. Data
from an acute study may  serve as a basis for classification and labeling.
It  is an initial  step in establishing a dosage regimen  in subchronic and
other studies and may  provide information on dermal absorption  and the
mode of toxic action of a  substance by this  route. An evaluation of acute
toxicity data should include the relationship, if any, between the exposure
of animals to the test substance and the incidence and severity  of all abnor-
malities, including behavioral and clinical abnormalities, the  reversibility
of observed abnormalities, gross lesions,  body weight changes, effects on
mortality, and any other toxic effects.

     (c) Definitions. The definitions in section 3 of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA) and the definitions in 40 CFR Part 792—Good Lab-
oratory Practice Standards apply to this test guideline. The following defi-
nitions also apply to this test guideline.

     Acute  dermal toxicity is the adverse effects occurring  within a short
time of dermal  application of a  single dose of a  substance or multiple
doses given within a 24-h period.

     Dosage is  a general term comprising the dose, its frequency  and the
duration of dosing.

     Dose is the amount of test substance applied. Dose is expressed as
weight of test substance (grams, milligrams)  per unit weight of test animal
(e.g. milligrams per kilogram).

     Dose-effect is the relationship between the dose and the magnitude
of a defined biological effect either in an individual or in a population
sample.

     Dose-response is the relationship between the dose and the proportion
of a population  sample  showing a defined effect.

-------
    LD50 (median lethal dose), dermal, is a statistically derived estimate
of a single dose of a substance that can be expected to cause  death in
50 percent of treated animals when  applied to  the skin.  The LD50 value
is expressed in terms of weight of test substance per unit weight of test
animal (milligrams per kilogram).

    (d) Approaches to the determination of acute toxicity. (1) EPA
recommends the following means  to reduce the number of animals used
to evaluate acute effects of chemical exposure while preserving its ability
to make reasonable judgments about safety:

    (i) Using data  from substantially similar mixtures. In order to mini-
mize the need for animal testing, the  Agency encourages the review of
existing acute  toxicity information on mixtures  that are substantially simi-
lar to the mixture under investigation. In certain cases it may be possible
to glean enough information to make preliminary hazard evaluations that
may reduce the need for further animal testing.

    (ii) Limit test.  When data on  structurally related chemicals are  inad-
equate,  a limit test  may be  considered. If rodents are used,  a limit dose
of at least 2,000 mg/kg bodyweight may be administered  to a single group
of five males and five females using the procedures described under para-
graph (e) of this guideline. If no lethality is demonstrated, no further test-
ing  for acute dermal toxicity is needed (Under current policy for pesticide
products, precautionary statements may still be required unless there are
data to indicate the LD50 is  greater than 5,000 mg/kg.) If compound-relat-
ed mortality is produced, further study may need to be considered.

    (2) [Reserved]

    (e) Conventional acute toxicity test—(1) Principle of the test meth-
od.  The test substance is applied dermally  in graduated doses to several
groups of experimental animals, one  dose being used per group. The doses
chosen may be based on the results of a range  finding test. Subsequently,
observations of effects and deaths are made. Animals that die during the
test are necropsied,  and at the conclusion of the test the surviving animals
are  sacrificed and necropsied. This guideline is directed primarily to stud-
ies  in either rats, rabbits, or guinea  pigs but may be adapted for studies
in other species. Animals showing severe  and enduring  signs of distress
and pain may  need to  be humanely killed. Dosing test  substances in a
way known to cause marked pain and distress due to  corrosive or irritating
properties need not be carried out.

    (2) Substance  to be tested. The composition of each lot of the test
substance must be determined, including the name and quantities of known
contaminants and impurities, as far  as  is technically feasible. The deter-
minations should include quantities  of known materials, if  any,  so that
100 percent of the test sample is accounted for. Test, control, and reference
substances are discussed at 40 CFR 792.

-------
     (3) Test procedures—(i) Preparations. Healthy young adult animals
are acclimatized to the laboratory conditions for at least 5 days prior to
the test before the test animals  are randomized and assigned to the treat-
ment groups.

     (ii) Animal  selection—(A) Species and strain. The rat,  rabbit,  or
guinea pig may be used. The albino rabbit is preferred because of its size,
ease of handling, skin permeability,  and extensive data base. Commonly
used laboratory strains should be employed.  If a species other than rats,
rabbits, or guinea pigs is used,  the tester should provide justification and
reasoning for its selection.

     (B) Age. Young adult animals, rats 6-  to  10-weeks-old on receipt
and between 8 and 12 weeks old at  the beginning of dosing; rabbits and
guinea pigs  at least 12 weeks old at the beginning of  dosing  should be
used. The weight variation of animals used in a test should not  be greater
or less  than 20 percent of the mean weight for each sex.

     (C) Number and sex  of animals. (7) At  least five experimentally
naive animals with healthy intact skin are used  at each dose level. They
should all be of the same sex. After completion of the  study in one sex,
at least one  group of five  animals of the other  sex is  dosed to establish
that  animals of this sex are not markedly more  sensitive to  the test sub-
stance.  The use  of fewer  animals  may  be justified  in  individual cir-
cumstances.  Where adequate information is  available to demonstrate that
animals of the sex tested are markedly more sensitive, testing in animals
of the other sex may be dispensed with.

     (2) The females should be nulliparous and nonpregnant.

     (3) In acute  toxicity tests with animals of a higher order than those
mentioned above, the use of smaller numbers should be considered.

     (D) Assignment of animals. Each animal must be assigned a unique
identification number. A system to randomly assign animals to test groups
and control groups is required.

     (E) Housing. Animals should be housed in individual cages.

     (7) The temperature of the experimental animal rooms  should be at
22 + 3 °C for rodents, 20 + 3 °C for rabbits.

     (2) The relative  humidity of the experimental animal rooms  should
be 30 to 70 percent.

     (3) Where lighting is artificial, the sequence should be 12-h light/
12-h dark.

     (4) For feeding,  conventional laboratory diets may be used with an
unlimited supply of drinking water.

-------
     (iii) Dose levels and dose selection. (A)  Three dose levels should
be used and  spaced appropriately to produce test groups with a range of
toxic effects  and mortality rates. The data should be  sufficient to produce
a dose-response curve and permit an acceptable  estimation of the median
lethal dose. Range  finding studies using single  animals may help to esti-
mate the positioning of the dose groups so that no more than three dose
levels will be necessary.

     (B) Limit test. This test is described under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this
guideline.

     (C) Vehicle. Solids should be pulverized when possible, the test sub-
stance  should be moistened sufficiently with water  or, where necessary,
a suitable vehicle to ensure good contact with skin. If a vehicle or diluent
is  needed,  it  should not  elicit toxic effects itself nor substantially alter
the chemical  or toxicological properties of the test substance. In addition,
the influence  of the vehicle on penetration of skin by the test substance
should be taken into account.  It is recommended that wherever possible
the use of  an aqueous solution be considered first, followed by consider-
ation of a solution in oil (e.g.  corn oil), and then by consideration of pos-
sible solution in other vehicles. For nonaqueous vehicles the toxic charac-
teristics of the vehicle should be known, and if not known should be deter-
mined before the test.

     (iv) Exposure and exposure duration. The test substance should be
administered  over a period of 24 h.

     (v) Preparation of animal skin. Fur should be clipped from the dor-
sal area of the trunk of the test animals. Shaving may be  employed, but
it  should be  carried out at least 24 h before  dosing.  Care  must be taken
to  avoid abrading the skin, which would alter its permeability.

     (vi) Application  of  test substance. (A) The test substance should
be applied uniformly over a shaved area which is approximately 10 percent
of the  body surface area.  The area starting  at the scapulae (shoulders) to
the wing of the ileum (hip bone) and half way down the flank  on each
side of the animal should be shaved. The volume of application should
be kept constant, e.g. less than 300 (iL for the rat; different concentrations
of the test solution should be prepared for different dose levels. With high-
ly  toxic substances, the  surface area  covered may be less, but as much
of the area as possible should be covered with as thin and uniform a film
as  practical. The test material is not removed after application. In the case
where less  than  10 percent of the surface area is  covered an approximation
of the exposed areas should be determined.

     (B) The test substance should be held in contact with the skin with
a  porous  gauze dressing  (<8  ply)  and  nonirritating tape throughout a
24-h exposure period.  The test site should be  further  covered in a suitable
manner to  retain the gauze dressing and test substance  and ensure  that

-------
the animals cannot ingest the test substance. Restrainers may be used to
prevent the ingestion of the  test substance, but complete immobilization
is not a recommended method. Although a semiocclusive dressing is pre-
ferred, an occlusive dressing will also be acceptable.

     (C) At the end of the exposure  period, residual test substance should
be removed where practicable using water or an appropriate solvent.

     (vii) Observation  period.  Although 14 days is recommended  as a
minimum observation period, the duration of  observation should not be
fixed rigidly. It should be determined by the toxic reactions, rate of onset,
and length  of recovery period, and may thus be extended when considered
necessary.  The time at which signs of toxicity  appear, their duration, and
the time to death are important, especially if there is a tendency for deaths
to be delayed.

     (viii)  Observation  of animals. (A) A  careful clinical examination
should be made at least once each day.

     (B) Additional observations should be made daily, especially  in the
early days  of the study. Appropriate actions should be taken to minimize
loss  of animals to the study (e.g. necropsy or refrigeration of those animals
found dead and isolation of weak or moribund animals).

     (C) Observations should be detailed and carefully recorded, preferably
using explicitly defined scales.  Observations should include, but not be
limited  to,  evaluation of skin and fur, eyes and mucous membranes, res-
piratory  and circulatory effects,  autonomic effects such  as  salivation,
central nervous system effects, including tremors and convulsions, changes
in  the level of motor activity, gait and posture, reactivity to handling or
sensory stimuli, grip strength, and stereotypies or bizarre behavior  (e.g.
self-mutilation, walking backwards).

     (D) Individual weights of animals should be determined shortly before
the test  substance is administered, weekly thereafter, and at death. Changes
in  weights  should be calculated and recorded when survival exceeds one
day.

     (E) The time of death should be recorded as precisely as possible.

     (ix) Gross  pathology. (A)  At the end of  the test,  surviving animals
should be weighed and sacrificed.

     (B) A gross necropsy should be performed on all animals under test.
All gross pathology changes should be recorded.

     (C) If necropsy cannot be performed immediately after a dead animal
is  discovered, the animal should be  refrigerated (not frozen)  at tempera-
tures low enough to minimize autolysis. Necropsies shall  be performed
no later than 16 hours after death.

-------
     (x)  Additional  evaluations.  Microscopic  examination of  organs
showing evidence of gross pathology in animals surviving 24 h or more
should also be considered because it may yield useful information.

     (xi) Data and  reporting—(A) Treatment  of results.  Data should
be summarized in tabular form, showing for each test group the number
of animals at the start of the test, body weights, time of death  of individual
animals at different dose levels, number of animals displaying other signs
of toxicity, description of toxic effects and necropsy findings. Any meth-
ods used for calculation of the LD50 or any other parameters should be
specified and referenced. Methods for parameter  estimation are described
under paragraphs  (f)(2), (f)(3), and (f)(4) of this guideline.

     (B) Evaluation of results. An  evaluation should include the relation-
ship, if any,  between exposure of the animals to the  test substance  and
the incidence  and severity of all abnormalities,  including behavioral  and
clinical abnormalities, gross lesions, body weight  changes, effects on mor-
tality, and any other toxic effects. The LD50 value  should always be con-
sidered in conjunction with the observed toxic effects and any necropsy
findings. The LD50  value is  a relatively coarse measurement, useful only
as a reference value for classification and labelling purposes, and for an
expression  of the lethal potential of the test substance by the ingestion
route. Reference  should always be made to  the experimental animal spe-
cies in which the LD50 value was obtained.

     (C) Test report. In addition to  the reporting requirements as specified
under 40 CFR part  792, subpart J  and 40 CFR  part 160, subpart J, the
following specific information should be reported.  The test report should
include:

     (7) Species, strain,  sex,and source of test animals.

     (2) Method of randomization in assigning animals to  test and control
groups.

     (3) Rationale for selection of species, if other than that recommended.

     (4) Tabulation of individual and test group data by sex and dose level
(e.g. number of animals exposed,  number of animals showing signs of
toxicity and number of animals that died or were killed during the test).

     (/) Description of toxic effects,  including their time of onset, duration,
reversibility, and relationship  to dose.

     (//) Body weights.

     (///) Time of dosing and time of death after dosing.

     (iv) Dose-response curves for mortality and other toxic effects (when
permitted by the method of determination).

-------
     (v) Gross pathology findings.

     (vf) Histopathology  findings and  any additional clinical chemistry
evaluations, if performed.

     (5) Description of any pre-test conditioning, including diet, quarantine
and treatment for disease.

     (6) Description of caging conditions  including:  Number (or  change
in number) of animals per cage, bedding material, ambient temperature
and humidity, photoperiod, and identification of diet of test animals.

     (7) Manufacturer, source, purity, and lot number  of test substance.

     (8) Relevant properties of substance  tested including physical state
and pH (if applicable).
        A list of references cited in the body of the report. References
to any published literature used in developing the test protocol, performing
the testing, making and interpreting observations, and compiling and evalu-
ating the results.

    (f)  References. The following references should be consulted for ad-
ditional  background information on this test guideline:

    (1) American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Test Meth-
od for Estimating Acute Oral Toxicity in Rats, a standard issued under
the fixed designation E 1163-87, under the jurisdiction of ASTM Commit-
tee E-35  on Pesticides and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
E3526 on  Safety to Man, Philadelphia, PA (1987).

    (2) Chanter, D.O. and Heywood, R., The LD50 Test: Some Consider-
ations of Precision, Toxicology Letters 10:303-307  (1982).

    (3) Finney,  D.J. Chapter 3 — Estimation of the median effective dose
and Chapter  4-Maximum likelihood estimation, Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.
Cambridge, London (1971).

    (4) Finney, D.J. The Median Lethal Dose and  Its Estimation. Archives
of Toxicology 56:215-218 (1985).

    (5) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD
Guidelines for Testing  of  Chemicals.  Guideline  420:  Acute  Oral  Tox-
icity — Fixed Dose Method. Endorsed by the Joint Meeting of the Chemi-
cals  Group and Management Committee,  20th-22nd November,  1991,
ENV/EPOC(92)15.

    (6) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD
Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Guideline 402:  Acute Dermal  Tox-
icity. Adopted: February 24, 1987.

-------