SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (5102G)
EPA 542-F-12-028
September 2012
Green  Remediation Best  Management Practices:
Mining  Sites
Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation
                                                                        Quick Reference Fact Sheet
  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Principles for
  Greener Cleanups outline the Agency's policy for evaluating
  and minimizing the environmental "footprint" of activities
  undertaken when  cleaning up a contaminated site.1 Use of
  the best management practices (BMPs) recommended in
  EPA's series of green remediation fact sheets can help project
  managers  and other stakeholders apply the principles on a
  routine basis while maintaining the cleanup objectives,
  ensuring protectiveness of a remedy, and improving its
  environmental outcome.
Federal agencies estimate that  approximately  500,000
abandoned mines and associated ore processing facilities
exist across the  United States.2 Of these, approximately
130 National Priorities  List  (NPL)  or  NPL-caliber sites
covering  more than a  million acres are contaminated
from  past  hard  rock mining activities  and  are now
undergoing cleanup  led by the lead federal agencies or
potentially  responsible parties.  Much  of  the  work  to
remediate and reclaim abandoned mine land  (AMI) at
other sites  is conducted  or  overseen  by  state  agencies,
often with voluntary assistance from non-profit groups.
Cleanup and restoration of sites with areas formerly used
to mine coal  or hard rock ore (containing metals such as
gold or copper or other resources such as phosphorous)
present unique challenges. Past activities typically included
onsite  extraction, crushing, and  separation  of  extracted
mineral ore  into  useable material  (beneficiation) and
onsite or offsite processes such as smelting. Environmental
contamination and degradation at mining sites commonly
resulted from:
•  Waste rock and beneficiation waste such as mill  tailing
  piles   often   scattered    in    numerous   surface
  impoundments
•  Mining influenced water (MIW), including contaminated
  surface water,  groundwater, and seepage  from former
  mine adits (openings)
•  Waste  in  the  form  of slurry  that was  injected into
  abandoned coal mines
•  Waste   sludge  (often  containing  surfactants  and
  flocculants) that was discharged into unlined  lagoons,
  or
•  Aerial   deposition   of  heavy   metals   and   other
  contaminants from ore processing activities.
Steps to remediate these conditions can  pose their own
environmental footprint,   which   can  be   reduced  by
adhering  to EPA's Principles for Greener Cleanups.
The core elements of a greener cleanup involve:
                                            Reducing   total   energy  use   and   increasing   the
                                            percentage of renewable energy
                                            Reducing  air pollutants and greenhouse  gas  (GHG)
                                            emissions
                                            Reducing water use and
                                            negative   impacts  on
                                            water resources
                                            Improving     materials
                                            management and waste
                                            reduction efforts, and
                                            Protecting   ecosystem
                                            services.
                                            Materials
                                            & Waste
   Energy
                                          Lai
                                        Ecosystems        Atmosphere
                                                  Water
                                          EPA's suite  of  green remediation BMPs describes
                                          specific techniques or tools to address the core elements.
                                          The  availability of  liquid  fuels and  electric  power, for
                                          example, poses a major challenge at many mining sites
                                          due  to  their remote  and  often high-altitude locations.
                                          Green  remediation  BMPs  focusing  on fuel and  energy
                                          conservation techniques or renewable sources of energy
                                          can  help   minimize   the  environmental  footprint  of
                                          particular    activities   (and   improve   the   project's
                                          environmental  outcome) while  addressing this challenge.
                                          Three documents  in   EPA's  "BMP  fact sheet"  series3
                                          provide  detail about BMPs  relating to fuel or energy use
                                          or optimization of energy-intensive  ex situ  technologies
                                          often deployed in MIW treatment plants:
                                          • Green Remediofion  Besf A/lonogemenf Practices: Clean
                                            Fuel & Emission Technologies for Cleanup30
                                          • Green  Remediation  Best   Management  Practices:
                                            Integrating Renewable Energy into Site Cleanup,3b and
                                          • Green Remediation  Best Management Practices: Pump
                                            & Treat Technologies.3^
                                          Other   significant    opportunities    to    reduce   the
                                          environmental   footprint   correspond  with   common
                                          components of mining site cleanup projects:

                                          > Characterizing  MIW in order to better  understand
                                            the nature and extent of contamination
                                          ^ Using passive  treatment systems for acid  mine
                                            drainage
                                          > Integrating onsite renewable  energy to power
                                            cleanup operations
                                          ^Installing soil covers to stabilize soil and waste piles
                                            and reduce their exposure
                                          > Reclaiming residual  natural resources  such as
                                            economically valuable metals from waste piles, and
                                          > Integrating  cleanup  with  restoration   and
                                            reuse of sites.

-------
  Characterizing MIW
Green remediation  BMPs for MIW characterization prior
to remedial system design and construction include:

• Use field test kits for screening whenever possible,  to
  reduce   the  number  of  samples  requiring   offsite
  laboratory analysis
• Deploy   low-flow  sampling   equipment   whenever
  possible, to minimize purge  volumes  and  energy use
  while producing little investigation-derived waste
• Deploy  remote  sensing techniques for identifying  and
  surgically  removing any subsurface   obstructions   or
  potentially   dangerous  materials  (such  as  residual
  explosives), to avoid excavating excess soil or material
• Use  noninvasive,   less  energy-intensive  investigative
  techniques  such  as borehole  and surface geophysical
  methods for identifying fracture zones and  groundwater
  flow/direction,  to  optimize contaminant mapping,  well
  placement,  and treatment system design
• Maximize reuse of existing boreholes for capturing  and
  hydraulically controlling seeps, to avoid additional land
  and subsurface disruption caused  by  creation  of  new
  boreholes
• Choose  sonic instead of conventional  rotary drilling  or
  hammer techniques whenever  possible,  to  minimize
  discharged  waste, avoid the need for drilling fluid,  and
  reduce noise
• Use  phosphate-free  detergents  instead  of  organic
  solvents   or   acids   to   decontaminate   sampling
  equipment,  and dispose of used washwater in contained
  vessels or designated onsite areas, and
• Use environmentally friendly drilling fluid or water  in a
  closed-loop system when  rotary drilling  is needed.4

Additional  BMPs are described in  Green Remediation  Besf
A/I an ag em en f  Practices: Site Investigation .3d
  Voluntary cleanup by a non-profit environmental group at the
  DeSa/e Restoration Area in western Pennsylvania involves
  a passive  treatment system for acid  mine  drainage
  exiting abandoned surface and underground coal mines. The
  system contains agricultural waste (spent mushroom compost)
  and limestone from a nearby quarry. It effectively neutralizes
  about 180 pounds of acidity per day.  Over  eight years of
  operation, the system recovered about two tons of manganese
  oxide; proceeds from sale of the recovered material were used
  to  maintain  the treatment system and construct  additional
  systems in other portions of the Slippery Rock Watershed.5
  Using Passive Treatment Systems
Highly acidic water rich in  metals (acid mine drainage
[AMD]) can be produced indefinitely after mining activities
cease and continue to pose significant risks to aquatic life
and  to humans  through  fish or  water consumption  or
direct contact. AMD and other MIW could be remediated
by a  passive treatment system comprising  one  or  more
ground-surface  "cells" that take  advantage  of a  site's
naturally  occurring  chemical  and  biological  processes.
For example,  a  passive treatment system could consist of
an  oxidation  pond, a  biochemical  reactor to transform
contaminants  into immobile forms and  increase pH, and
remediation   polishing  technologies  such  as  aerobic
wetlands  or limestone  beds.  The site's natural  hydraulic
gradients or a pumping system can  be used to transport
the MIW to these treatment cells from  adits or seeps. A
passive treatment system also can  be used as a polishing
step following ex situ treatment of MIW in an onsite water
treatment plant.
  Through EPA funding, the University of Oklahoma constructed
  a  passive treatment  system  for seepage  from  abandoned
  underground  lead  and zinc  mines  at  the  Tar  Creek
  Superfund Site in Oklahoma.  The system encompassed
  oxidation/re-aeration  ponds,  surface  flow wetlands, vertical-
  flow/sulfate-reducing  biochemical  reactors,  and horizontal
  flow limestone beds. Approximately 90% of each  biochemical
  reactor  consisted of agricultural and  forestry  waste
  products.

  To accelerate oxidation in the ponds, off-grid renewable
  energy systems were integrated into the system's design:
  *  A 20-foot windmill  provides mechanical energy to power a
    vertical displacement pump operating in one pond, and
  *  A photovoltaic array generates electricity to directly operate
    a compressor in an adjacent pond.
                              10%
                          manufactured
                          limestone sand
Green  remediation  BMPs  for  constructing   a   passive
treatment system include:

• Design  extensive  stormwater controls prior  to use  of
  heavy   machinery,  to  avoid   additional  runoff  and
  watershed  sedimentation  or  contamination;  controls
  may  involve  existing  rock-lined   channels   or  other
  topographic  features  as well as  engineered structures
  such as berms and grassy swales
• Maximize reuse  of remnant service  roads  or  cleared
  areas,  and  use  surgical  techniques to remove any
  vegetation  during  construction  of new transportation
  corridors or work areas

-------
• Explore the use of check dams  and other structures to
  capture any rainwater or snow  melt for application in
  onsite activities  such  as  controlling  excavation  dust,
  rinsing hand-held equipment after field use, or irrigating
  newly planted vegetation
• Preserve existing  corridors or create new ones if needed
  to assure safe passage of migratory animals, and
• Schedule   startup  of  major  land-disturbing  activities
  during  non-nesting  or non-birthing periods  of  local
  ground-dwelling  birds  or wildlife, and  install grates in
  mine adits to allow bat passage.
A  biochemical  reactor  is typically  lined and  contains
organic-rich  material  along  with buffering material such
as crushed limestone.  Lumber, agricultural, or greenhouse
byproducts   (such   as  hardwood   chips,  mulch,   hay,
livestock  manure,  or  spent  mushroom  compost)   or
municipal  biosolids  often provide  the organic  matter.
BMPs  for  constructing  and   monitoring  a   biochemical
reactor within a passive treatment system include:

• Choose a  geomembrane  (liner) manufactured through
  processes  involving a  low  environmental impact, such
  as  those  described  in ISO  14001   (Environmental
  Management Systems)
• Procure organic materials from producers closest to the
  site,  to  minimize  fuel  consumption  and  related  air
  emissions from heavy trucks
• Explore other industrial byproducts  that may be  more
  available on a local basis, such as chitin or cocoa  shells
• Consider  use of  novel protein-containing  food  waste
  such  as banana peels to  bind metals existing at trace
  concentrations in  water; research  has shown that such
  waste may improve metal detection during monitoring
  and potentially serve as a sorbent to remove metals at
  higher concentrations,6 and
• Install remote  monitoring  equipment  such as  sonde
  units  to  continuously collect water quality data  while
  significantly reducing frequency of site visits.
  Integrating Onsite Renewable Energy
As an  alternative to using and transporting liquid fuel or
attempting to extend connection to the  local utility grid,
onsite  renewable energy systems may  be installed during
remedy construction  or added as needed during system
operation to:
• Supplement  gradient-driven  transfer  of  MIW  to  or
  among treatment cells
• Improve treatment efficacy of certain cells such as  those
  used for aeration, and
• Generate electricity  or  mechanical  energy for routine
  field equipment or small devices.
Mobile units now available in the commercial market offer
significant potential for generating  renewable  energy at
remote  locations such  as mining sites.  Depending  on  a
site's  accessibility  and  terrain, mobile  systems   could
provide collapsible photovoltaic (PV) arrays or small wind
turbines  mounted on trailers  designed to supply over 20
kilowatts (kW) of electricity. Smaller arrays or mini turbines
(generating less than 1  kW) can  be packaged on  simple
frames or  skids to be  hauled by  a  pick-up truck  or  all-
terrain vehicle.
In addition, surface waters on or adjacent to many mining
sites offer the potential  of hydropower at various scales. A
2 kW micro-hydropower submersible turbine, for example,
can be deployed to operate with a hydraulic head as little
as 1.5 meters to  provide  mechanical energy or drive an
electricity generator. In  contrast, a 36 kW microturbine at
the  Summitville Mine in Del  Norte,  Colorado,  generates
hydropower  that offsets grid  electricity consumed  by an
onsite water treatment plant.
 Solar energy is used at the Leviathan Mine Superfund
 site  in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California for four
 remote monitoring stations at key seeps and creeks and for an
 onsite emergency shower unit.  Each monitoring station was
 custom built by EPA Region 9 staff to include  a  PV array for
 battery charging; multiprobe sonde to measure water quality
 parameters  of streams  impacted  by  AMD;  and satellite
 telemetry for hourly data  collection  and transmission to EPA
 offices.

 The  Atlantic  Richfield  Company  operates  a  PV-powered
 meteorological station and a solar  thermal unit at adjacent
 portions of the site.  The solar thermal unit maintains warmth
 throughout the year for an electrical system  used  to control
 propane-fueled generators powering a semi-passive treatment
 system. In cooperation with the  National Renewable Energy
 Laboratory,  EPA  Region  9 is investigating larger renewable
 energy applications to power the  treatment  system pumps,
 which  currently  rely on  summer-only  fuel delivery to this
 remote site.
 Installing Soil Covers
Waste rock  and  ore process  tailings  found  in  surface
impoundments at mining  sites typically  settle  over time.
Impoundment stabilization often involves constructing one
or more  soil covers  (caps)  for waste  left  in place  or
consolidated  in  one or  more  selected  areas.  Green
remediation BMPs for designing a cover include:
• Mimic  rather than  alter the  site's  natural  setting,  to
  improve the cover's long-term performance and protect
  local ecosystem services
• Account for potential effects of climate change, such  as
  increased vulnerability to  flooding  or sudden shifts  in
  temperature

-------
  Explore industrial  waste products as a partial substitute
  for  productive  soil  to  be  imported  for  a  cover's
  compacted clay layer or the liner of a new landfill for
  waste   consolidation,  if  product   testing   shows  no
  contaminant leaching, and
  Consider anticipated site reuse options during design of
  a  cover;  for example,  industrial  redevelopment of the
  site may reduce the volumes of materials to be imported
  for a vegetative cover.
  Biosolids, limestone, potash, and fly ash were blended to form
  a soil  amendment that was spread on ground  surfaces
  through a single pass at the Palmerton Zinc Pile Superfund
  site  in Carbon  County,  Pennsylvania. A seed  mix of native
  plants unlikely to accumulate metals  (such as big and little
  bluestem,  deerfongue,  Indiangrass,   and  switchgrass)  was
  applied with the ground amendment and aerially distributed.

  Onsite studies conducted 10 years later indicated significant
  re-growth of vegetation in formerly denuded areas across the
  estimated  2,500  acres  previously   amended   and  little
  accumulation of metals such as cadmium, lead,  and zinc in
  resident  mammals.7 Current efforts by EPA, the Pennsylvania
  Game Commission, and the National Park Service focus on
  developing  a remediation  and  reuse  plan for remaining
  denuded public land covering  about  1,200  acres along the
  Appalachian Trail.
• Consider onsite generation  of compost made of forest
  waste  resulting  from  logging  activities  or  disease-
  infested trees, to reduce import of soil amendments; for
  example, "beetle  kill" trees  could provide a significant
  source of biomass
• Explore  use  of  biochar  (a  charcoal-like  substance
  produced  by  heating  biomasss  in  the  absence  of
  oxygen) as a soil  amendment, to  better retain moisture
  and nutrients, and
• Blend  amendments into  a  single mixture that can  be
  applied  above  the cover through a  one-step process
  rather than  a  series  of  applications,  to   minimize
  operation of front loaders and other  heavy machinery.

Additional  BMPs  regarding  ET or other alternative designs
as well as  conventional  covers are described  in  Green
Remediation Best Management Practices: Landfill Cover
Systems & Energy Production.3"1
  Research is underway in test plots at the Hope Mine near
  Aspen,   Colorado,   to   evaluate   efficacy   of  biochar
  amendment in  restoring soil affected by mine waste rock
  piles. Along with biochar, the applied amendment contained a
  seed mix,   compost,  hydromulch,  and  naturally occurring
  mycorrhizal fungi to help plant roots take in nutrients. In each
  plot, biodegradable netting was placed  on ground surfaces to
  hold the amendment in place.  No irrigation was needed for
  plant re-establishment, which occurred within one year.
Soil covers at some mining sites involve use of an evapo-
transpiration (ET) system, which relies  on a thick layer of
soil with vegetative cover capable of storing water until it
is transpired or evaporated (and  consequently minimizing
percolation  into underlying waste). Soil in the upper layer
is often amended to restore quality of the soil  and provide
nutrition  to  the   vegetation.  Amendments  containing
organic-rich  material such  as  biosolids can also  bind
metal  in soil, thereby reducing the  metal bioavailability.
Green remediation BMPs for an ET cover include:

• Select drought-resistant plants  for the upper vegetative
  layer,  to  reduce  maintenance needs;  in  some cases,
  non-native species  may  offer  higher viability  potential
  and water storage capacity than native plants
• Preserve biodiversity and related ecosystem services by
  installing  a  suitable mix of non-invasive grasses, forbs,
  and shrubs
• Choose nonsynthetic  nutritional soil amendments such
  as compost instead of chemical fertilizers
                                                              Reclaiming Residual Natural Resources
Historic landfills, waste piles, and components of passive
treatment  systems  at   many   mining  sites  offer  the
opportunity to  reclaim  rather  than dispose  of  valuable
metals or other natural resources. The reclaimed material
often can  be sold to industrial businesses for recycling.
Depending on the type of materials formerly mined onsite,
green remediation BMPs include:

• Use water treatment systems that recover metals  from
  AMD; for  example, a  system at the  French Gulch site
  near Breckenridge, Colorado, produces zinc sludge that
  is  used directly by a  nearby zinc smelter
• Recover  metals such  as  copper or nickel from oxides
  settling in limestone beds
• Recover  gold or  copper from former mine tailings,  if
  control   of   associated  cyanide-   or  sulfuric  acid-
  containing solution or leachate is feasible
• Recover  metals  such as copper in slag remaining  from
  past smelting

-------
  Explore  options for excavating  and recycling landfill
  wastes  from  past  coal  mining  and  processing  into
  synthetic fuel  (synfuel) that can be converted to useable
  energy, rather than installing a new cover system, and
  Explore  potential to use methane  from  a co-located
  landfill,  ongoing  coal  extraction   processes,  or  an
  abandoned coal mine with methane recovery potential;8
  at  the  abandoned   Cambria  Slope  33   Mine   in
  Pennsylvania, for example,  recovered waste  methane
  powers  a  0.7  megawatt   (MW)   off-grid   electricity
  generation facility for onsite natural gas extraction.
 During cleanup at the 97-acre Fairmont Coke Works-
 Sharon Steel Site in West Virginia, reclamation of historic
 landfill material for use as synfuel feedstock resulted in:
 •  Reduced burdens on the hazardous waste-permitted facility
    otherwise receiving nearly 241,000 tons of waste
 • Avoided  CHC  emissions and heavy road use  associated
    with transport of waste to the permitted facility
 •  Substitution of raw coal otherwise mined  and processed to
    produce electricity for about 37,000 homes over one year
 • Averted use of water  otherwise needed to  produce an
    equivalent amount of fuel from raw coal  by an offsite coal
    processing plant.   .	
Re-establishment of
vegetative and  soil
conditions that ex-
isted  before  mining
activities   occurred
often  is  a  critical
cleanup  step  and   accelerates  site   restoration  and
productive reuse. Re-established vegetation can help:

• Stop  physical dispersal of the  waste through  erosion,
  wind, or human or animal direct contact
• Minimize  infiltration  to  and through  mass  below a
  landfill/waste cover and control  associated  leachate
  production and  release
• Provide  elements of  an ET  cover that  could  develop
  naturally over time
• Apply  phytotechnologies   to  treat  soil   or   water
  contaminated   by  non-heavy   metals   or  chemical
  compounds used in past processing activities
• Capture and sequester atmospheric carbon, and
• Restore ecological services to the community.
  Ecosystem  services  are  the  benefits  that  people,
  communities,  and economies receive from nature. At mining
  sites,   healthy  soil  and  vegetation  provide   significant
  ecosystem services such as:
    • Purifying shallow groundwater and surface waters
    •Retaining water otherwise lost  to runoff or evaporation,
     and
    • Controlling erosion and  minimizing associated  loss  of
     valuable topsail during flooding.
 EPA's  National  Risk  Management  Research   Laboratory
 recommends a three-step process to select plants most
 effective for a vegetative landfill cover and complementary to
 site reuse plans:
 1)  Obtain lists of suitable plants from:
     • The pertinent state highway department
     • Relevant and  concerned non-government organizations
      such as the Nature Conservancy
     • Researchers or contractors knowledgeable about the role
      of vegetation in remediation and the site's conditions
 2)  Cross-reference the lists to identify plants recommended by
     multiple organizations or experts
 3)  Consult with  the local U.S. Department of Agriculture or
     U.S. Forest  Service   office to  determine which of those
     plants are likely most  viable in the target microclimate.
 Integrating Cleanup with Restoration/Reuse
Green  remediation  BMPs  can  be implemented during
cleanup design or construction phases to ultimately  help
restore  mining-impacted ecological systems; for example:

• Install trees that complement forestry plans on  adjacent
  properties owned by government agencies such as the
  U.S.  Forest  Service,  if the  installation  area  excludes
  constructed soil covers and suggests tree survival under
  likely acidic conditions
• Promote surface water  corridors that replicate original
  riparian conditions and  complement regional watershed
  plans
• Incorporate re-use preferences of organizations wishing
  to   expand    local   recreational   or   environmental
  education services for the  community
• Design   cleanup   infrastructures   that   complement
  municipal  or   industrial  plans  to  use   the  land  for
  regional waste-to-energy  facilities; for  example, timber
  and agricultural businesses  could  supply biomass for
  electricity generation, or food  producers/retailers could
  provide waste  serving  as feedstock for  a  biodigester
  (which converts waste heat to useable energy), and
• Coordinate   with   prospective   renewable   energy
  developers to  combine cleanup efforts with site reuse
  for producing  energy from onsite renewable resources;
  EPA's RE-Powering America's Land initiative can provide
  assistance in pursuing renewable energy development.9
   At the Chevron Questa Mine site in Taos County, New
   Mexico, a  1 MW concentrated solar photovoltaic  (CPV)
   facility currently operates above 20 acres of covered mine
   tailings as  remediation work in  other areas begins;  since
   early 201 1  startup, the facility has sold generated electricity
   to a local utility under a power purchase agreement.
   At the New Rifle Mill site in Colorado, portions of the site
   were converted  to  an energy  innovation  center without
   disturbing continued cleanup efforts to address uranium and
   vanadium  contamination;  the  first  installation  of  clean
   energy technology on  this site is a 12-acre, 1.7 MW zero-
   emission  solar energy system  that  powers a  co-located
   regional wastewater reclamation facility.

-------
Remedy construction and operation as well as site restoration
at the Elizabeth Mine Superfund site  near South Stratford,
Vermont,  involves  a  range  of  BMPs  to:  reduce  air
contaminants   associated   with   onsite   or   offsite   fuel
consumption;   use   onsite  rather  than  imported  natural
resources wherever possible; establish processes for maximum
recycling  or  reuse  of waste  materials;  and  initiate  a
procurement process for environmentally preferred products.
The greener cleanup strategy includes  methods for preserving
the site's historic aspects and ecosystem services.10
                     Mining Sites:
              Recommended Checklist
Characterizing MIW
    Use field test kits, remote sensing techniques, and
    geophysical methods wherever possible
    Deploy low-flow sampling devices
    Choose sonic drilling techniques and environmentally
    friendly drilling fluids wherever possible
Using Passive Treatment Systems
    Choose quickly renewable agricultural products or
    industrial byproducts rather than raw natural
    resources as organic-rich materials wherever possible
    Integrate stormwater controls and capture rainwater
    and snowmelt for onsite  use
    Minimize site disturbance by reusing remnant roads
    and other infrastructure components
Integrating Onsite Renewable Energy
    Maximize use of renewable energy systems to power
    cleanup equipment
    Deploy mobile units to generate power from solar or
    wind resources as needed
Installing Soil Covers
    Design with the intent of maintaining natural settings
    and addressing potential effects of climate change
    Maximize control of soil erosion caused by rain, wind,
    or construction activities
    Explore use of industrial waste products rather than
    imported soil
Reclaiming Residual Natural Resources
    Reclaim valuable metals from tailings or leachate
    Explore production of useable energy from onsite
    waste left by coal extraction/processing
    Investigate potential to convert methane from a co-
    located landfill into useable energy
Integrating Cleanup with Restoration/Reuse
    Complement regional forestry and watershed plans
    Deign cleanup infrastructures that complement reuse
    options such as recreation
    Coordinate with prospective utility-scale renewable
    energy developers
 Since  2001,  a public-private partnership  among  the
 Pennsylvania  Department of Environmental Protection,  Trout
 Unlimited, other government agencies, local stakeholders, and
 private industry  has worked  to  address  coal AMD at  the
 abandoned Fran  Contracting, Inc.  Camp Run No. 2
 surface   mine   near  Renovo,   Pennsylvania.  Preliminary
 remediation work included constructing a  pilot-scale passive
 treatment system to treat AMD affecting three Susquehanna
 River  tributaries  with  high  or exceptional values  for water
 quality and cold-water fisheries.

 The system's sulfate-reducing  bioreactor  consisted of 50%
 wood  chips, 30% limestone, 10% manure,  and 10% hay in a
 lined cell three feet below ground surface and capped with
 soil.   Performance   monitoring  indicated  the   bioreactor
 achieved significant increases  in  pH and reductions in acidity
 and iron,  aluminum,  and sulfate concentrations within  one
 year of startup. Costs to  construct  the system, which treated
 about one gallon of AMD per minute, totaled $42,000.
  References [Web accessed: September 2012]
1  U.S. EPA; Principles for Greener Cleanups; August 27, 2009;
  http://www.epa.gov/oswer/greenercleanups
2  Abandoned Mine Lands Portal;
  http://www.abandonedmines.gov/ep.html
3  U.S. EPA; Green Remediation Best Management Practices:
  " Clean Fuel & Emission Technologies for Site Cleanup; EPA 542-F-
   10-008; August 2010
  b Integrating Renewable Energy into Site Cleanup; EPA 542-F-l 1 -006;
   April 201 1
  c Pump and Treat Technologies; EPA542-F-009-005; December
   2009
  dS/fe Investigation; EPA542-F-09-004; December 2009
  e Landfill Cover Systems & Energy Production; EPA 542-F-l 1-024;
   December 201 1
4  U.S. Department of Energy; Environmentally Friendly Drilling System
  Program: Balancing Environmental Tradeoffs; June 201 1
5  U.S. EPA; CLU-IN Green Remediation Focus; DeSale Restoration
  Area; http://www.cluin.org/greenremediation/subtab_d20.cfm
6  "Banana Peel Applied to the Solid Phase Extraction of Copper and
  Lead from River Water: Preconcentration of Metal Ions with a Fruit
  Waste;"  Renata S.D. Castro et al.; Industrial & Engineering Chemistry
  Research; 201 1, 50 (6), 3446-3451
7  U.S. EPA; Palmerton Zinc Pile, Superfund Case Study; February 201 1;
  EPA 542-F-l 1-005
8  U.S. EPA; U.S. Abandoned Coal Mine Methane Recovery Project
  Opportunities; EPA 430-R-08-002; July 2008;
  http://www.epa.gov/coa I bed/docs/cmm_recovery_opps.pdf
9  U.S. EPA; RE-Powering America's Land;
  http://www.epa.gov/oswercpa/index.htm
10 U.S. EPA; CLU-IN Green Remediation Focus; Elizabeth Mine;
  http://www.cl uin.org/greenremediation/subtab_d36.cfm

  EPA/OSWER appreciates the many contributions to this fact sheet, as
    provided by EPA's National Mining Team, regional offices, and
                laboratories or by private industry.

  The Agency is publishing this fact sheet as a means of disseminating
information regarding the BMPs of green  remediation; mention of specific
      products or vendors does not constitute EPA endorsement.
              Visit Green Remediation Focus online:
           http://www.cluin.org/greenremediation
                 For more information, contact:
      Carlos Pachon, OSWER/OSRTI (pachon.carlos@epa.gov)
              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------