TRANSITIONING TO  LOW-GWP ALTERNATIVES
                                        IN  NON-MEDICAL AEROSOLS
Background
This fact sheet provides current information on low-Global Warming Potential (GWP) alternatives for non-medical commercial aerosols
(i.e., excluding metered-dose inhalers (MDIs)) that have historically relied on ozone depleting substances controlled under the Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer} Aerosols use liquefied or compressed gas to propel active ingredients in liquid,
paste, or powder form in precise spray patterns with controlled droplet sizes and amounts. Typical aerosol products use a propellant that is
a gas at atmospheric pressure, but is a pressurized liquid in the can. Some aerosols also contain a solvent. In some cleaning applications,
the propellant disperses the solvent; in other applications, the solvent product and propellant solution are evenly mixed to improve shelf-life
and product performance, such as by preventing dripping and ensuring uniform film thickness for spray paints. Non-medical commercial
aerosols can be broken down  into the following two product categories:
Consumer Aerosols
» Tire inflators/sealants
• Safety signal horns
• Animal repellants
• Personal care products (e.g., cosmetic aerosols, hairspray,
  deodorants, wound care sprays,2 taping base3)
» Food  dispensing products
• Freeze sprays (e.g., food freezing, animal waste freezing, cold
  sprays4)
• Spray paint
• Novelty aerosols (e.g., artificial snow, plastic string, noise
  makers, cork poppers)
• Miscellaneous consumer aerosols (e.g., household cleaning
  products, brake cleaners,5 eyeglass and keyboard dusters,
  room fresheners, spray adhesives)
Technical Aerosols
• Dusters6 (e.g., for photographic negatives, semiconductor
  chip manufacture, specimens for observation under electron
  microscope)
« Cleaners (e.g., electronic contact cleaners,7 flux remover8)
• Pesticides (e.g., wasp and hornet sprays, aircraft insecticides)
• Miscellaneous technical aerosols (e.g., document preservation
  sprays, freeze sprays9)
Although a large portion of the aerosol market has avoided HFC
propellants and solvents by transitioning directly to low-GWP
options and "not-in-kind" (NIK) alternatives, in 2010, global HFC
consumption from aerosols was estimated at 54 million metric
tons of carbon  dioxide equivalent (MMTC02eq.).Twenty-four
percent of this  amount was from the non-medical commercial end-
uses described  above. Developed countries accounted for nearly all
of the global HFCs used in commercial aerosols.
                                            2010 HFC Consumption
                                          (Estimates Presented in MMTC02eq.)
                          Fire Extinguishing
                                     Solvents
                       Foams
                        11%
              Ref/AC
               79%
                                             Aerosols
                                               5%
               Non-Medical
                Aerosols
                  24%
                                    Medical
                                    Aerosols
                                      76%
                                      Global HFC Consumption Total: 1,087 MMTC02eq.
                                      Global HFC Consumption Aerosol: 54 MMTC02eq.

-------
HFC Alternatives and Market Trends
Historically, CFC-12 was used as a propellant and CFCs (e.g., CFC-
11 and -113) and methyl chloroform were often used as solvents
in aerosols. In response to the CFC phaseout, these were replaced
with a variety of alternatives, including HCFCs, hydrocarbons (HCs),
oxygenated organic compounds, and NIK alternatives. HCFCs
included primarily HCFC-22 for  propellants and both HCFC-141b
and HCFC-22Bca/cb for solvents.10 HCFC  propellants have in turn
been replaced with high-GWP HFCs—including HFC-134a—as
well as a variety of low-GWP substitutes,  such as HCs, compressed
gases, NIK alternatives, and HFC-1 B2a. Likewise, HCFC solvents have
been replaced by HFC-43-10mee, HFC-36Smfc, HFC-24Sfa, trans-
1,2-dichloroethylene, HCs, oxygenated organic compounds, and
hydrofluoroethers (HFEs). Other low-GWP fluorinated compounds
are also in use or under development, including HFOs.11 These
alternatives are described further below.

HCs
• Propane, butane, and isobutane blends used  for  propellants
• Hexane, heptane, and other HCs used as solvents
• Used in technical and some consumer aerosols
• Plant modifications needed to address flammability/
  safety concerns
• Local use restrictions may apply due to  concerns over
  volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, in particular in
  the United States

Oxygenated Organic  Compounds
• Dimethyl ether (DME) used for propellants
• Esters, ethers, alcohols, and ketones used  as solvents
• Used in technical and consumer aerosols
• Plant modifications needed to address flammability/
  safety concerns
• Local use restrictions may apply due to  concerns over
  VOC emissions, in particular in the United States

NIK
• Finger/trigger pumps, powder formulations, sticks,  rollers, brushes,
  bag-in-can/piston-can systems, wipes, sand-blasting, brushing,
  and abrasion used in place of propellants and solvents in technical
  and consumer aerosols
• Mixing balls and dip tubes also used in place of high-GWP
  solvents in technical aerosols; propellants still required
Europe's Experience
Europe is the world's largest producer of aerosols, with 5.5
billion units produced in 2011 representing nearly 46% of global
production. Of these, 5.1 billion were produced in the European
Union (EU). Shortly after the signing of the Montreal Protocol,
the EU aerosol industry transitioned from CFCs to HCFCs for the
majority of non-medical aerosols in 1989, and then transitioned
away from HCFC propellants to  HFCs (primarily HFC-134a), HCs,
and NIK devices by 1995. In 2002, the European  industry voluntarily
began the transition away from  HFCs through the Code of Practice
on HFC Use in Aerosols of the European Aerosol Federation, which
specified that HFC propellants only be used when no other safe,
practical, economic, or environmentally acceptable alternatives exist.
This transition was later boosted by EU regulation (Regulation (EC)
No. 842/2006), which banned HFC use in novelty aerosol products
as of July 2009.
Chemical
GWP
ODPa
Propellant
CFC-1 2
HCFC-22
HFC-1 34a
N2O
HFC-1 52a
HFO-1234ze(E)
Butane
Propane
Isobutane
CO2
DME
10,900
1,810
1,430
298
124
6
4
3.3
3
1
1
1
0.055
0
0.017
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Solvent
CFC-1 13
CFC-1 1
HFC-43-10mee
HFC-245fa
HFC-365mfc
HCFC-141b
HCFC-225cb
HFE-449s1 (HFE-7100)
Methyl chloroform
HCFC-225ca
HFE-569sf2 (HFE-7200)
Oxygenated Organic Compounds
-1233zd(E)(HBA-2)
Hexane
Heptane
6,130
4,750
1,640
1,030
794
725
595
297
146
122
59
<20
4.7-7
3
3
0.8
1
0
0
0
0.11
0.033
0
0.1
0.025
0
0
~0
0
0
                                                                  aODP = ozone depletion potential

-------
Compressed Gases
• Includes C02, air, nitrous oxide (N20), and nitrogen
• Used as propellants in some technical and consumer
  applications (e.g., dusters)
» N20 commonly used in food dispensing aerosols
HFEs
• Used as solvents in technical aerosols
• No flammability
• May be mixed with other, more flammable compounds with
  higher solvency, such  as fra/?s-dichloroethylene
HFC-152a
• Although an HFC, the GWP is 91 % lower than HFC-134a
• Used as a propellant in technical and consumer aerosols,
  particularly where VOCs are of concern, such as in the
  United States
• Moderate flammability
                     Propellant Transition in Consumer
                      and Technical Aerosol End-Uses
Low-GWP Fluorinated Compounds
• HFO-1234ze(E) used as a propellant in technical and
  consumer aerosols
• Other low-GWP fluorinated compounds are becoming available
  as propellants and solvents (e.g., -1233zd(E)12 used as solvent)
• Depending on solvency of the fluorinated compound, it
  may be mixed with other, more flammable compounds with
  higher solvency
* Some exhibit low flammability, others non-flammable
• Few facility modifications required to transition from HCFCs
  or MFCs
                                                                                          Low-GWP Fluorinated
                                                                                              Compounds
                       Solvent Transition in Technical
                              Aerosol End-Uses
                                      HCFCs
                                  141b,225ca/cb)
HFCs(43-10mee
 365mfc, 245fa]
                                                                                           Dxygenated Organic
                                                                                              Compounds
                                                                                          Low-GWP Fluorinated
                                                                                              Compounds
                                             3ted

-------
Challenges to Market Entry and  Potential Solutions
Alternative
HCs, Oxygenated Organic
Compounds
(Propellant and Solvent)
NIK
(Propellant and Solvent)
Compressed Gases
(Propellant)
HFEs (Solvent)
HFC-152a (Propellant)
Low-GWP Fluorinated
Compounds
(Propellant and Solvent)
Challenges to Market Entry
• Highly Flammable
• VOC Regulation and Air Quality Impacts
• Lower Performance for Some Applications
• Fewer Blasts per Can Compared to MFCs
• Lower Performance for Some Applications
• Moderate Flammability
• Some Are Still Entering World Markets
Potential Solutions
• Engineering Controls
• Standards and Safety Regulations
• Training and Education
• Engineering Design
• Engineering Design
• Mixing with Other, More Aggressive Solvents
• Engineering Controls
• Standards and Safety Regulations
• Training and Education
• Field Testing
Future Outlook
Much of the aerosol sector has avoided the use of MFCs, transitioning from CFCs or HCFCs directly to low-GWP alternative chemicals and
NIK solutions. Together, the suite of known alternative chemicals and NIK options can significantly reduce the remaining  HFC consumption
in both the near and long terms, while simultaneously helping to complete the HCFC phaseout. Although more work remains to fully adopt
these alternatives, the industries currently  using HCFCs and  HFCs have proven through the ODS  phaseout that they can move quickly to
protect the environment.
1  Although MDIs are also transitioning away from CFC propellants to HFC propellants, critical use exemptions allow the limited use
  of CFCs for safety and technical reasons.
2  Wound care sprays include germicides and spray-on bandages.
3  Taping base is used on injuries to help secure tape, underwrap, and elastic wraps.
4  Topical coolants and freeze sprays are used by medical trainers and athletes. After application, the spray evaporates from the
  skin, lowering the surface temperature to alleviate pain.
5  Brake cleaners remove oil, dirt, and other debris from vehicle braking systems. Brake cleaners previously used methyl chloroform
  and successfully avoided use of high-GWP HFCs by transitioning directly to perchloroethylene or carbon dioxide as a solvent/
  propellant.
6  Duster sprays are com pressed gases used to blow off dust or dirt, particularly from computers and electronic equipment.
7  Electronic contact cleaners are used to dissolve and remove oil, grease, flux, condensation, and other contaminants quickly from
  delicate electronic circuitry and instrumentation.
8  Flux removers are used to clean excess flux and solder residue from circuit boards and electrical components.
9  Among other uses, freeze sprays are used to test electrical conductivity of components on circuit boards, and freeze and
  remove warts.
10 In the United States, the use of HCFC aerosols was banned for nonessential products in 1994. Only a few types of products
  were allowed.
11 HFOs (hydrofluoro-olefins) are unsaturated HFCs.
12 -1233zd(E), an unsaturated compound, is also referred toastrans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-eneand by trade names such
  asHBA-2.
             v>EPA
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA430-F-13-013  • www.epa.gov • April 2013
             •••r Printed on recycled paper

-------
References
American Chemical Council Solvents Industry Group. 2011. Benefits of Solvents: Aerosol Products. Available at: http://www.
americanchemistry.com/s_acc/sec_solvents_doc.asp?CID=1490&DID=5729. Accessed May 5, 2011.

Anderson, Stephen 0., K. Madhava Sarma, and Kristen N.Taddonio. Technology Transfer for the Ozone Layer: Lessons for Climate Change.
2007. Available online at: http://books.google.com/books?id=OvgA-hZrPOcC&pg=PA1 S6&lpg=PA156&dq=not-in-kind+alternatives+for+a
erosols+in+europe&source=bl&ots=BSsjjZ8seF&sig=zTmlEGSSJy8h8xnCCrGjxOnBz30&hl=en&ei=ZX2xTZ2WMZSftweZI7mKDA&sa=X&oi=
book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=OCBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed April 22,  2011.

Center for Sustainable Production and Consumption (C-SPAC). 2005. "Ecofridge: Make the Right Choice Now." Consumer Unity & Trust
Society (CUTS). Available online at: http://www.cuts-international.org/sc98-1.htm.Accessed February  18, 2013.

European Aerosol Federation. 2013. "Code of Practice on MFCs Use in Aerosols." Available at: http://www.eesc.europa.eu/self-and-
coregulation/documents/codes/private/021-private-act.pdf. Last update: 02 January 2013. Accessed February 18, 2013.

International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)/Technical and Economical Assessment Panel (TEAP). 2005. "Safeguarding the Ozone Layer
and the Global Climate System: Issues Related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons," Chapter 10: Non-Medical Aerosols, Solvents,
and HFC-23. Campbell, N., J. Hu, P. Lapin, A. McCulloch, A. Merchant, K. Mizuno, J. Owens, P.  Rollet. Available online at: http://www.ipcc.ch/
pdf/spedal-reports/sroc/srodO.pdf.  Accessed April 14, 2011.

International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Third Assessment Report - Climate Change 2001:  Mitigation. Aerosol Products,
Excerpt from Appendix III of the Report. Available online at: http://unfccc.int/files/methods_and_science/other_methodological_issues/
interactions_with_ozone_layer/application/pdf/ipacat3.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2011.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2010. Chemicals Technical Options Committee 2010 Assessment Report.
Available online at: http://ozone.unmfs.org/Assessment_Panels/TEAP/Reports/CTOC/CTOC-Assesssment-Report-2010.pdf. Accessed
February 20, 2012.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). October 2009. 2009 Marginal Abatement Cost Curve Analysis for Reduction of MFCs in
Traditional Ozone Depleting Substance End-Use Applications. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and
Radiation, by ICF  International. Draft Report.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). June 2006. "Global Mitigation of Non-C02 Greenhouse Gases." U.S. EPA #430-R-06-005.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). September 2004. The U.S. Solvent Cleaning Industry and  the Transition to  Non Ozone
Depleting Substances. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, by ICF International. Draft Report.

Wenzel, H. and Hauschild, M. 1998. "Environmental Assessment of Products: Volume 2: Scientific Background." London, UK:
Chapman & Hall.

-------